&3$-
          ^
                    ll^^Sa^^*
                    ^ i' fff X'. ' y' -^'V^. 'jM-V^f./ ' #  ''y i ^
                                         ?'ftf •'*/?'-*(?v^V^9
                                         h.''r^.£ntra&
                                         .K;^-V-.-V^^%
                                         ^-v??^^::^""
 t- &»i"}Zi',s''^? '^ ?y-



  Pevfy
  Vf.vc.-a*!
  ^%r:-JW:

 la^j
 1*",^"^',^*^
T>&'''*/^*4/'J

 .,'2 ,'^' "',J^, J'" :
 %-^-- ;-^,v^^



 ^i^yi
.1*-
                           "'f^f^'**-W>-'--
                         a ri>^<^/^':f "-<"^j:^:.. '-

                         Si-..-;-.?-.' .V-^--\./V^t"/^-;:,^;fe:-
                                                  '^as
                               ^ r^^;^ j;^>|;r ^C; ;•' v;;SiS5f^


                ^ffll^i^^^v^MI;:*^^^^^
                "'^*^v;?i^';^;^<,?<>'>'/;H'* r^'v,/^ '/>---^r-v  <^r,/,/  /-; *  ^ ,-,%-#*? *'%-%»&
                 ^•^,/-.^^ :^'->^

                                                    :->-i -, •&:•:• x$&r
                                                    •.•^•''.••••*;^\'W%&,
                                                    '  '	
  mm
  i^*t;>,;"",';,;';,;'','


  *"*- '•', s^>'
  •",>'?-'*7?'y"'',"-,-/', ?*; '.. ' /,  '  '''  ,' - -  -,'" *> "f> / ' " «>''» '',',' , ,>>">,  ' V" * ' --"' '"*/""/*},}
  fegK»'?:'-r^- O^y>:^ ^V?^'/"^1' -'/ \'>;^;--:;^'^'^^r^>;;^^


  ^^fe^^.^^^^;^'fefe:^:^S

Kr«t':;:^fffi.:"«'>f:',^^::-*!Wil«IM)<::iCt;:.,'-: •S-:aSii55)^p«*ft»-;;y::s:
                                                                            ^S^N

                                                                         3**^>^'^'^;^i
                                                                           -**, / - ; -; '," „ jv
                                                                           •^;%r; >r »',<;•"$

                                                                           r^^'-; ^'"s ' A^
                                                                           ,,^C/r,^' '
  <&&

-------
                              EPA FOREWORD
    This report has been prepared as one of the inputs to the
Environmental Protection Agency's Kepone Mitigation Feasibility Project.
The flanded participants included:  The Corps of Engineers, Norfolk
District; the Department of Energy; Battelle Pacific Northwest
Laboratories; EPA's Gulf Breeze Environmental Research Laboratory; and
the Virginia Institute of Marine Science.  The separate reports of the
participants appear as Appendices to the Kepone Mitigation Feasibility
Project Report.

    While conclusions and recorTrendations are included in each
participant's report, they are conditional within the scope of each
project participant's tasks.  Project conclusions and recommendations
are the responsibility of EPA and are included in the Kepone Mitigation
Feasibility Project Report.

    The Executive Summary addresses the concept of Kepone "indices"
development for water, for sediment, and for food consumed by organisms.
At this time no formal criteria have been approved by EPA for Kepone.
Thus, the "indices" discussed here should be considered only as
"guides" for use in the Kepone Mitigation Feasibility Project.
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Office of Water and Hazardous Materials
                    Criteria and Standards Division
                        Washington, D.C.  20460

-------
                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
    EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY

/   BIONOMICS - EG&G,  INC.  1976.
         Acute toxicity of  Kepone to embryos of the eastern oyster (Crassostrea
    virginica).  Toxicity Test Report submitted to U.S.  Environmental Protection
    Agency, Gulf Breeze Laboratory,  Sabine Island, Gulf  Breeze,  Florida.   March.

£,  HANSEN, DAVID J., ALFRED J. WILSON, JR., DEL WAYNE R. NIMMO, STEVEN C. SCHIM>
    AND LOWELL H. BAHNER. 1976.
        Kepon^:  Hazard to aquatic organisms.  Science 193  (4253): 528.

3.  NIMMO, DEL WAYNE R., LOWELL H. BAHNER, REBECCA A. RIGBY, JAMES M. SHEPPARD,
    AND ALFRED J. WILSON, JR. 1977.
        Mysidopsis bahia: An estuarine species suitable for life-cycle toxicity
    tests  to determine  the effects of a pollutant.  In: Aquatic Toxicology and
    Hazard Evaluation.  ASTM STP 634, F.L. Mayer and J.L. Hamelink, Eds. American
    Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 109-116.

H.  WALSH, GERALD E., KAREN AINSWORTH, AND-ALFRED  J. WILSON, JR. June 1977.
        Toxicity and uptake of Kepone in marine unicellular algae.   Chesapeake
    Science 18  (2)-.222-223.

JT.  SCHIMMEL,  STEVEN C. AND ALFRED J. WILSON,  JR.  June 1977.
        Acute  toxicity  of KeponeR to four estuarine animals.  Chesapeake  Science
    18  (2):224-227.

C,,  HANSEN, DAVID J., LARRY R. GOODMAN, AND  ALFRED J. WILSON, JR. June 1977.
        KeponeR chronic ef|.ects on embryo,  fry, juvenile,  and adult  sheepshead
    minnows  (Cyprinodon variegatus) . Chesapeake Science  18  (2) -.227-232.

7,  HANSEN, DAVID J., DEL WAYNE R. NIMMO, STEVEN  C. SCHIMMEL, GERALD E. WALSH,
    AND ALFRED J. WILSON, JR.  July 1977.
        Effects of Kepone on  estuarine organisms.  In: Recent Advances  in  Fish
    Toxicology: A Symposium.  EPA publication 600/3-77-085.  pp.  20-30.

%<  COUCH, JOHN A., JAMES T.  WINSTEAD, AND  LARRY  R. GOODMAN. August  1977.
        Kepone induced  scoliosis and its  histological consequences in fish.
    Science  197:585-587.

    BAHNER, LOWELL H.,  ALFRED J. WILSON,  JR.,  JAMES M. SHEPPARD,  LARRY R.  GOODMA1
    GERALD E.  WALSH, AND JAMES M. PATRICK,  JR.  September  1977.
        Kepone bioconcentration, accumulation, loss, and  transfer through estua]
    food  chains. Chesapeake  Science  18  (3):299-308.

/6, BOURQUIN,  AL. W., PARMELY H. PRITCHARD,  AND WILLIAM  R.  MAHAFFEY. 1977.
        Effects of Kepone on  estuarine microorganisms. Developments  in Industria.
    Microbiology Volume 19  (in press).

//,  BAHNER,  LOWELL H. AND JERRY  L.  OGLESBY.  October,  1977.
        Test  of model  for predicting Kepone accumulation in selected estuarine
    species.  In: Proceedings  of  the  ASTM Second Symposium  on Aquatic Toxicology.
    October  31-November 1,  1977.  Cleveland,  Ohio,  (in press).

/£, GARNAS,  RICHARD  L., AL  W.  BOURQUIN,  AND PARMELY H. PRITCHARD.  1978.
          The  fate of  14-C Kepone  in  Estuarine Microcosms.  Presented  at 175th
    National  Meeting  of the American Chemical Society, Anaheim,  California, Marc'
    Pesticide Chemistry, paper 59.

-------
/S".
J4.
 I 'I
 /'%.
 /?.
At.
     RUBINSTEIN, NORMAN  I. 3977.
         A benthic bioassay usinp time-lapse photography to measure the effect
     of toxicants on the feeding behavior of lugworms  (Polychaeta: Arenicolidae) .
     In:  Symposium on Pollution and Physiology of Marine Organisms"!   (Eds:
     W.S. and J.F. Vernberg) Academic Press (in press).

     SCHIMMEL, STEVEN C., JAMES M. PATRICK, JR., LINDA F. FAAS, JERRY  L. OGLESBY,
     AND ALFRED J. WILSON, JR.
         Kepone:  Toxicity to and bioaccumulation by blue crabs.  Estuaries
     (in press) .

     COSTLPV, JOHN D. ?977.
         Effects of insect growth renulatnry end .iuvenilp hormone mimics on
     crustacean develonment.  Quarterly Renort to the  Environmental Protection
     Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida.
     NICHOLS, MAYMARr/ M., Ar'!D RICHARD C.  TROTM/w.  1977.
         Kepone in Janes River Sediment.   Annual  Report to
     Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory,
                                                           the Environmental
                                                           Gulf Breeze, Florida
     HUGGETT, ROBERT J. 1977.
         The role of sediments in the storage, movement, and biological  uptake
     of Kepone in estuarine environments.   Annual  Report to the Environmental
     Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze,  Florida.

     HAVEN, DEXTER S.  AND REINALDO MORALES-ALAMO.  1977.
         Uptake of Kepone from suspended sediments by oysters, Rangia and Macoma.
     Annual Report to the Environmental  Protection Agency, Environmental
     Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida.

     O'CONNOR, DONALD J. AND KEVIN J. FARLEY.  1977.
         Preliminary analysis  of Kepone distribution in  the James River.
     Report to the Environmental Protection Agency,  Environmental Research
     Laboratory, Gulf Breeze,  Florida.

     PROVENZANO, ANTHONY J., KATHLEEN B. SCHMITZ,  AND MARK A.  BOSTON. 1977.
         Survival, duration of larval stapes,  and  size of postlarvae  of  grass
     shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio, reared from Keoone  contaminated and  uncon-
     tamin?ted populations in  Chesap°ake Bay.   Final Report to the Environmental
     Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze,  Florida.
     Accepted for publication  in Chesaneat'e Science.

     BOIWIN, AL
         Fate and
W.  PARMFLY H. ?D!TrH;"nO, Af1'^ HFDBFRT L. F^EH0TCKSO!1'. ]97,°..
effects of Kepone in artificial  estuarine ecosystems.
     Abstract for American Society
     Las Vegas, Nevada.
                                   of Microbiolopy National  Meptino,  May 197R,
     GARNAS, RICHARD L., AL W. BOURQUIN, AND PARMFLY H. PRITCHARD. 1978.
         The fate of 14C-Kepone in estuarine microcosms.  Abstract for
     American Chemical Society National Meetina, March 1978, Anaheim, California,

-------
          EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
             Prepared By
U.S. Env ronmental Protection Agency
  Envirc mental Research Laboratory
          .If Breeze, Florida
             May 9, 1978

-------
I.  Conclusions




     Laboratory studies indicate that Kepone does not degrade either bio-




logically or chemically in simulated estuarine systems and this informatic




suggests that degradation processes will not significantly alter the level




of Kepone now found in the water and sediments of the James River.




     Clean-up indices for water quality were devised for Kepone in estuari




waters following the "Guidelines for Developing Water Quality Criteria for




Aquatic Organisms for Consent Decree Chemicals."  The final index     for




24-hour average concentrations of Kepone in estuarine waters should never




exceed 0.008 ug Kepone/1 of water.




     Concentrations of Kepone in food organisms should be less than 0.015




Kepone/kg in tissue to minimize undesirable impacts on consumer species.




Examination of partition coefficients between sediment and water, bioconce




tion factors for benthic organisms, and food chain effects indicate that c




centrations should be less than 0.015 mg Kepone/kg in sediment.




     Conventional methods of analysis for Kepone in estuarine water, biota




and sediments have acceptable limits of detection of 0.020 ug Kepone/1 of




0.020 mg Kepone/kg in tissue and 0.020 mg Kepone/kg in sediment, respecti\




The pro2osed criteria are below acceptable limits of detection by conventi




methods of analysis and lead to the final conclusion that a hazard exists




Kepone can be detected in the James River Estuary by these methods of anal

-------
II.  Introduction




     The Gulf Breeze Laboratory was initially involved with the Kepone




problem in the James River Estuary late in 1975 with the initiation of




studies to determine the toxicity of Kepone to estuarine animals, bioaccumu-




lation of Kepone in estuarine aninals, and studies of Kepone residues in




animals living in the James River Estuary.  These studies were gradually




increased in scope during 1976 and some of the information on Kepone toxicity




was presented in the federal criminal action brought against Allied Chemical




Corporation and Life Science Products in October 197_6.




     During 1976 ongoing studies at ERL, Gulf Breeze, and research studies




supported by ERL, Gulf Breeze, provided information on the ecosystem effects




of Kepone and processes that xcere allowing crabs, oysters, and fish to




concentrate Kepone in their tissues to a level making them unsafe for human




consumption, i.e., reaching concentrations above the FDA designated action




levels.  This required a complete study of the effects of Kepone on repre-




sentative species amenable for study under laboratory conditions, and to




correlate "these studies with all the information that could be gathered from




monitoring and field experiments.  The results of this information were used




to develop saltwater indices1 for Kepone.  The index     for water was




developed using the methods outlined in the "Guidelines for Developing Water




Quality Criteria for Aquatic Organisms for Consent Decree Chemicals" prepared




by the Ecology Laboratories of the Office of Research and Development.  These




guidelines are still evolving and the procedures used were current in April 24




1977.  The criterion should include consideration of production, use, chemical,




and physical properties, occurrence, and human health implications.  However,




our indices  only considered protection of aquatic life and uses of aquatic life.




Also, the unique situation in the Janes River Estuary where production and use




have ceased and the major source of Kepone is recycled Kepone from the estuarine







                                      3

-------
sediments requires a modified approach, the development of separate  indie




for aquatic food organisms and for sediment.




     Significant concentrations of Kepone are present in various phases oJ




the estuarine system of the James River—in solution, Huggett (1977) in tl




sediment, Nichols and Trotman (1977) and in the food chain, Bender et al.




(1977), particularly in fishes.  The interrelationships, or more specific*




the transport, uptake, and release of Kepone, are thus affected by both pi




chemical mechanisms, Huggett (1977), Garnas et al. (1977), as well as bio-




gical phenomena, Bahner et al. (1977), Bahner and Oglesby  (1977).  The ph\




chemical mechanisms include the hydrodynamic transport through the estuari




system, adsorption to and desorption from the suspended and bed solids, an




settling and resuspension of these solids, Huggett (1977), Nichols and Tro




(1977).  The latter incorporates the assimilation and excretion routes thr




the various components of the food chain, Bahner and Oglesby (1977), Schim




et al. (in press). The potentially significant transport and kinetic proce




transfer to the atmosphere, photochemical oxidation, and biological degrad




are not significant for Kepone, Garnas et al. (1978).




     The basic information required as a major contribution to the mitigat




study was the development of a quantitative framework to evaluate the




dynamics of Kepone movement within the James River Estuary system.  This




could lead to an evaluation of the time required to reduce the Kepone con-




centrations to an acceptable level.  The major role was taken by Battelle




in providing this evaluation to the mitigation study and data from the




experimental program and the field studies mentioned above have been used




in the Battelle reports.  The progress made by O'Connor and Farley (1977) j




a parallel modeling effort is reported in this volume.  The GBERL program




has included a series of sponsored research projects at the Virginia Ins tit

-------
of Marine Science, principal investigator—Dr. Robert Huggett; Manhatten

College, principal investigator—Dr. Donald O'Connor; Duke University,

principal investigator—Dr. John Costlow; and Old Dominion University,

principal investigator—Dr. Anthony Provenzano.

III.  Water Quality Clean-up Index

      Table I.  Derivation of Saltwater Clean-up  Index for Kepone

     The reader is referred to the "Guidelines for Developing Water Quality


Criteria for Aquatic Organisms for Consent Decree Chemicals" prepared by th
                                                   \
Ecological Effects Laboratories of the Office of Research and Development i

order to better understand the following summary and recommendation.  The i;

of these "Guidelines" results in the following Tables and the calculations

contained in them.  These "Guidelines" were developed exclusively for the

"65-21 Consent Decree Chemicals."  Our use of the "Guidelines" for the

establishment of a Kepone  index     is tentative, and should not be con-

sidered final or precise.  Additionally, the Kepone  index     has been re-

viewed only at ERL, Gulf Breeze and has not received proper review by all

ORD Ecological Research Laboratories and the Office of Water and Hazardous

Materials as required for criterion generation.

     The. estuarine fish, spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) is particularly sensit

to Kepone; the Final Fish Acute Value calculated from this species is 6.6

ug Kepone/1 of water.  The Final Invertebrate Acute Value is 0.60 ug Kepone

of water.  Consequently the lower of the two, 0.60 ug Kepone/1 of water,

becomes the Final Acute Value.

     Chronic studies have been conducted on sheepshead minnows and marine

mysids.  The Final Fish Chronic Value is <0.01 ug Kepone/1 of water; the Fd

Invertebrate Chronic Value is 0.008 ug Kepone/1 of water.  Therefore, the

Final Chronic Value is _<0.008 ug Kepone/1 of water.

-------
     The marine alga, Chlorococcum sp., is the most sensitive plant species




to Kepone; the Final Plant Value is <350 ug Kepone/1 of water.




     The Residue Limited Toxicant Concentration (RLTC) is based on  (1) a




study in which blue crab survival or molting was adversely affected after




being fed a diet of oysters which contained 0.15 mg Kepone/kg in tissue, and




(2) an average bioconcentration factor of 7688.  This RLTC is <0.019 ug Kepone/1




of water.




CLEAN-UP INDEX:  The 24-hour average concentration should never exceed




                 0.008 ug of Kepone/liter of water.




     It is important to emphasize that the data on the chronic effects of




Kepone on fish, and the feeding studies on blue crabs provide "less than"




values.  Results of laboratory tests with crabs, shrimp, fish, and  shellfish




exposed only to Kepone in seawater underestimate the residues of Kepone




measured in similar animals exposed to similar measured concentrations in the




James River Estuary.  Therefore, we consider that the index     is  conservative.

-------
                                                                                                                  '. .I*'
                                                                                                                   .'i...
            Table  II. Fish Acute  Values  for Kepone
                                                               Corrected
Organism
Sheepshead minnow,
Cyprinocion variegatus
Longnose killifish,
Funaulus similis
Spot,
Leiostomus xanthuruti
White mullet,
Mugil curema

Bioaseay
Method >v
FT
FT
FT
FT
Test
Cone. **
M
U
M
U
Time
(hrs.)
96
48
96
48
LC50
(Uq/1)
69.5
84.
6.6
55.
LC50
(uq/1)
69.5
52.4
6.6
34.3
Deference
Schimmel
Butler,
Schimmel
Butler,
and Wilson,
1963
ana Wilson,
1963
1977
1977
 *S = static; FT = flow-through

**M = measured; U = unmeasured   ••,

  Geometric mean of corrected values = 30.1 pg/1
                                                       .  8  14
                                                   3.7
Lowest value from a flow-through test with measured  concentration = 6.6 pg/1

-------
              Table  III. Fish Chronic Values  for   Kepone
Organism

Shcepshead minnow,
Cyprinodon variegatus
Test
Limits
(uq/i)
Embryo/    <0.0«
larval
Chronic
Value
(uq/1)

<0.08
                                   Reference
                         Hansen,  et  al.,  1977
Lowest chronic value = <0.08  pg/1  <0-08 = <0.01 ng/1

-------
              Tdbie  IV.  Invertebrate Acute Values for  Kepone
Ot iiiinigni

Eastern oyster,
Crassostrea virginica

Eastern oyster,
Crassostrea virginica

Mysid shrimp,
Mysidopsis bahia    »*

Grass shrimp,
Palaemonctes pugio

Brown shrimp,
Penaeus aztecus
                        BiOcissay  Test
                        M c 1 1 ion _*_  Cone .

                          FT         U
                          FT
FT


FT


FT
M


M
Time
(HIS.)

  96


  96


  96


  96


.  48
                                                      LC50
 57.


 15.


 10.1


120.


 85.
                                                                Corrected
                                                                LCbO
                                                                 120.
                     Ketetence
                                         43.9     Butler, 1963
                                         11.6     Butler,  1963
                                                                  10.1    Niirano, et  al..  1977
Schimmel and Wilson,  1977
                                                                  28.1    Butler.  1963
 *S  = static;  FT = flow-through

'"'•'M  = measured;  U = unmeasured

  Geometric mean of corrected  value  = 29.6 |ig/l    "• °  = 0.60 pg/1
                                                   49
                                                                                                                    /l-i  <
                                                                                                                    >*-f'6
                                                                                                                 -  .-/V.V'
  Lowest value  from flow-through test based on measured concentrations = 10.1  pg/1

-------
O
                             Table v.  Invertebrate Chronic Values  tor  Kepone
Organism

Mysid shrimp,
Hysidopsis bahia
Test

 LC
 Limits
 (ug/l>

 .026 to-'
0.072
                                                                      Chronic
                                                                      Value
                                                                      (uq/1)
                                                                      0.043
Reference

Nimmo,  1978
                                                 Pg/1
                                                         '
                                                         5.1
                                            0.008 Mg/1

-------
              Table VI.   Plant Eifects tor  Kepone
organism

Alga.
Chlorococcum sp.
Ettect

Growth
inhibition
(EC50)
Alga,                   Growth
Dunaliella tertiolecta  inhibition
                        (EC50)
Alga,
Nitzschia sp.
Growth
inhibition
(EC50)
Alga,                   Growth
Thalassiosira pseudonena inhibition
                        (EC50)
Concentration
(uq/11	

    350
                   580
    600
                   600
Natural phytoplankton   94.77. decrease   1,000
communities             in productivity;
                        1,000 l"C in a
                        4-hr exposure
Reterfence

Walsh, et al., 1977



Walsh, et al., 1977



Walsh, et al., 1977



Walsh, et al., 1977



Butler, 1953
Lowest Plant Value = <350 pg/1.

-------
Table  VII. Residues tor Kepone

Or q.mism
EnsLern oyster.
Grasses trea virginica

Ec-istern oyster,
Crassostrea virginica
Marine mysid.
Mysidopsis bahia
Grass shrimp, ^
Palaemonetes pugio
Gi ass shrimp ,
Palaemonetes pugio
Sheepshead minnow,
Cyprinodon variegatus

Bioconcentration Factor
9,354

t"
9,278

5,962

5,127

11,425

7,200

TIME
(days)
19


21

21

28

28

36


weterence
Bahner, et al. , 1977


Bahner, et al. , 1977

Bahner, et al . , 1977

Bahner, et al. , 1977

Bahner, et al. , 1977

Hansen, et al . , 1977

Maximum Permissable Tissue Concentration
Organism

Man
Man
Blue crabs

Average bioconcentration factor =
Lowest residue concentration = <0.
Action Level or Effect

Shellfish
Fish
Food

7,688
,15 <0- 15 = 
-------
                                     Table VIII.other  Data  tor  Kepone
Oj
                  Organism

                  Alga.
                  Chlorococcum sp.

                  Alga,
                  Dunaliella tertiolecta

                  Alga,
                  Nitzschia sp.
                       Test
                       Duration
                        24 hrs


                        24 hrs


                        24 hrs


                        24 hrs
                  Alga,
                  Thalassiosira Pseudonena
Eastern oyster (larvae),48  hrs
Crassostrea virginica

Blue crab,              4 days
Gallinectes sapidus

Grass shrimp,            4 days
Palaemonetes pugio

Grass shrimp (larvae),   £21.7
Palaemonetes pugio      ~
                  Sheepshead minnow,      4 days
                  Cyprinodon variegatus

                  Spot,                   4 days
                  Leiostomus xanthurus

                  Blue crab,              96 hrs
                  Callinectes'sapidus

                  Blue crab,              96 hrs
                  Callinectes sapidus

                  Blue crab,              56 days
                  Callinectes sapidus
                          Result
                          luq/11
Ettect

Bioconcentration
factor - 800X

Bioconcentration
factor - 230X

Bioconcentration
factor = 410X

Bioconcentration
factor - 520X

EC50                      66.
 Bioconcentration
 factor  =8.1

 Bioconcentration
 factor  =  698

,No  effect on  survival,
 size  or duration of
 larval  stages for larval
 with  residues of <0.63
 mg/kg Kepone

 Bioconcentration
 factor  =  1548

 Bioconcentration
 factor  =  1221

 207. mortality          1,000.
                                  07. mortality'             210.
                                  Survival  or  molting
                                  was  reduced  in crabs
                                  fed  oysters  containing
                                  0.15 mg/kg Kepone
Reference

Walsh, et al., 1977


Walsh, et al., 1977


Walsh, et al.. 1977


Walsh, et al., 1977


Bionomics Report,  1976


Schlmmel and Wilson,  1977


Schimmel and Wilson,  1977


Provenzano, et al.,  1977
                                                                     Schimmel and Wilson, 1977
                                                                     Schimmel and Wilson, 1977
                                                                     Butler. 1963
                                    Schimmel and Wilson, 1977
                                    Schimmel, et al.,  In Press

-------
IV.  Food Clean-up  Index


     Acute exposure of blue crabs to Kepone in sea water in  the  laboratory


indicated relatively low toxicity and bioconcentration, Schimmel et  al.


(1977).  In contrast, monitoring data indicated that blue crabs  from the  James


River Estuary accumulated significant concentrations of Kepone,  Bender  et al.


(1977).  Schimmel et al. (in press) found that the major route of Kepone  entry


is through contaminated food and not water.  Therefore, estimates of an index


for contaminated food were developed as shown in Tables 1 and VII of the  water

                                                    \
index.      Guidelines have not been developed by OR&D laboratories  for these


types of data to estimate safe concentrations for untested species and  to provide


adequate protection when data do not support a no-effect concentration.   We


support a Kepone food index     of 0.015 mg Kepone/kg of tissue  obtained  in  the


following manner.


Toxic Effects of Kepone in Food


     Effects of Kepone on growth and survival of blue crabs  fed  oysters


contaminated with Kepone, Schimmel et al. (in press), are the only laboratory


data demonstrating adverse effects of. this''pesticide in food on  an aquatic organism.


Concentrations of 0.15 mg Kepone/kg of oyster meat fed to blue crabs diminished


survival, or molting.  However, because the data do not provide us with  a  no-effect


concentration, we applied a safety factor of 0.1 to this concentration  to provide,


in our judgement, an index    (0.015 mg Kepone/kg of tissue) that should  be


protective of consumer species.


Food_ciean-up Index Relative to Kepone in James River Food Organisms


     A criterion of 0.015 mg Kepone/kg in food organisms is  far  less than monitoring


data revealed in animals from the James River Estuary.  An analysis  of  the data


of Bender et al.  (1977)  indicated that the average concentration of  Kepone in


fishes and invertebrates from the James River which could be eaten ranged from

-------
0.090 to 2.0 mg Kepone/kg of tissue.  Our data on effects of Kepone in oysters




fed to blue crabs support the hypothesis that undesirable impacts on survival




and molting of blue crabs are occurring in the James River.




v.  Sediment Clean-up Index




     The monitoring studies by Huggett  (1977), the State of Virginia (1977), and




Battelle (1977) clearly demonstrate that most of the discharged Kepone is




now resident in the sediments of the James River Estuary.  The main sink is




in the bed sediment of the estuary, in  the zone of the turbidity maximum, where




suspended sediments'are trapped and deposited.  The hypothesis used to explain




this distribution, and the processes used in modeling Kepone transport (and  long-




term persistence and bioavailability in the estuary), is that Kepone is bound




to sediment and sediment transport processes control the distribution of Kepone,




Huggett (1977), O'Connor (1977).




     The concentrations of Kepone are orders of magnitude greater in the bed




sediments than dissolved in estuary water.  Garnas et al. (1978), Huggett  (1977),




and Battelle (1977) have shown that partition equilibria for Kepone between




sediment and water are directly affected by the sediment quality. Therefore,




mitigation must address Kepone in sediments.




     It _is important to use all the available information to estimate the sediment




concentration that must be achieved to  eliminate the hazard to aquatic life  and




its consumers.  Additionally, it is essential to consider: 1) the direct toxic




effects and the bioavailability of Kepone contained within the bed sediments,




Bahner (1977), Rubinstein (1977), and adsorbed to suspended sediment, Haven  and




Morales-Alamo (1977); 2) bioconcentration in the food chain directly from sediment;




and 3) the dissolved Kepone in the estuary water which is controlled by the




sediment/water equilibrium, Garnas et al. (1978).




    Indices   for acceptable concentrations of Kepone in sediments can be




derived by examining how Kepone partitions among water, sediments, and

-------
benthic biota.  Experiments have shown that benthic organisms  (lugworms,




Arenicola cristata, and fiddler crabs, Uca pugilator) that injested James River




sediments with 0.250 ng Kepone/kg of sediment attained whole-body residues of




0.250 to 0.300 mg Kepone/kg of tissue within 21 days, Banner et al. (in prepara-




tion).  Lugworms did not survive exposure to these sediments after 21 days.




Concentrations as low as 2.8 ug Kepone/1 seawater caused a reduction in the




normal substrate reworking activity of the lugworm and 29.5 ug Kepone/1 seawater




was acutely toxic within 144 hours to lugworms burrowing in sediments, Rubinstein




(1978).  Kepone did not depurate from lugworms and fiddler crabs over a period of




a few weeks in clean water, Banner et al. (in preparation).




C]ean-up Indices Formulation for Kepone in Sediments




     Three methods for determining indicies for Kepone-laden sediments are




feasible:




     1.  a safety factor can be applied to sediment concentrations shown to be




toxic to animals;




     2.  food quality index     f°r estuarine food chain based on accumulation




of Kepone by animals from sediments to concentrations that exceed the food




quality index;




     3.  index •    based on desorption of Kepone from James River sediment into




water at concentrations that exceed the water quality index;




Sediment Clean-up Index Based on Sediment Toxicity and Safety  Factors




     Insufficient data are available to determine if reducing Kepone concentra-




tions in sediment by any factor will be protective to benthic organisms.




Sediment Clean-up Index Obtained from the Food Quality Index




     Benthic organisms attained Kepone concentrations similar  to the amount




in sediments.   The food quality index     is 0.015 mg Kepone/kg of tissue.




Therefore,  Kepone concentrations in sediment should not exceed 0.015 mg Kepone/kg




of sediment to insure that Kepone concentrations are less than the food quality




index.

-------
Sediment Clean-up  Index Obtained  from  the  Water  Quality Index and Sediment/


Water Partition Coeffients


     Establishment of an acceptable concentration of Kepone  in  sediments


may be based upon the premise that an  equilibrium exists  for  Kepone between the


sediment and water [Kp == (ug/kg sediment)/(ug/1 water)].  An  examination  of


laboratory Kp-values indicates numbers ranging from 2.5 to 1700,  Garnas et  al.


(1978), Huggett (1977), Dawson (1977).  If pure reference clays and sand  are


ignored (Kp = 2.5-50), the range  is between 100 to 1700 and  is  related to the


quality and quantity of organic material in the sediment.  Using  these values


to derive acceptable sediment concentrations, a Kepone water  index     not


greater than 0.008 ug Kepone/1 of water at equilibrium  is related to a range


from 0.0008 to 0.014 mg Kepone/kg in sediment.  The average  concentration of


Kepone in James River sediments from December 1976 through July 1977 was  0.150


mg Kepone/kg of sediment, Huggett (1977), with the limit of Kepone analysis in


sediments at 0.020 mg Kepone/kg of sediment.


Derivation of a Final Kepone Sediment  Clean-up Index


     If a Kepone partition between water and James River sediment of Kp=lOOO is
                                     ,     ' if

utilized, concentrations of 0.008 mg Kepone/kg of sediment would  result in


equilibrium concentrations equal  to the Water Quality Index     of 0.008  ug


Kepone/1 of water.  Because the food quality index     is 0.015 mg Kepone/kg


of tissue,  the concentration of Kepone in sediment must not exceed 0.015  mg


Kepone/kg of sediment.  Since the lower limit of analytical detection of  Kepone


in sediments is usually 0.020 mg Kepone/kg of sediment, both  derived concen-


trations are below analytical detection.  Therefore if Kepone is present  in


measurable  quantities, it is hazardous to aquatic life.

-------
VI.  Degradation of Kepone




Test Results




     Studies by Garnas et al.  (1978) have employed static and flowing water-




sediment systems to assess both biological and non-biological degradation of




Kepone.  Sediments with and without Kepone contamination were taken from the




James River and used in these systems.  The fate of Kepone was monitored using




radiolabelled (^C) material and total budget chemical analysis.  Using a




variety of experimental conditions (oxygen concentration, nutrient additions,




Kepone levels, sediment sources, sunlight, temperature, and salinity), these




studies indicate that Kepone does not degrade (i.e., complete recovery of




Kepone after extended incubation periods) either biologically or chemically




in laboratory systems.  These data suggest that degradation processes will not




significantly alter the levels of Kepone now found in the water and sediment




of the James River, and place further emphasis on the indices derived for




water,  food, and sediment.

-------
                Acute toxicity of KEPONE to
                embryos of the eastern oyster
                (Crassostrea vi rgi ni ca)
        Toxicity Test Report
            Submitted to
U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
      ,£ulf Breeze  Laboratory
            Sabi ne  Island
        Gulf Breeze,  Florida
                          Bionomics - E G & G ,  Inc.
                          Marine Research Laboratory
                          Route 6,  Box 1002
                          Pensacola,  Florida  32507
                          March 1976

-------
     A marine toxicity test was conducted to determine the acute
effect of KEPONE on embryos of the eastern oyster (Crassostrea
v i r g i n i c a).   The criterion for effect was reduction in the num-
ber of normal embryos in test concentrations (those which developed
to the fully-shelled, straight-hinged veliger stage  within 48
hours) as compared to the number of normal control embryos.  Re-
sults  of the test are expressed as a 48-hour EC50 (the concen-
tration of KEPONE estimated to be effective in preventing normal
development of 50% of the embryos).

                      MATERIALS AND METHODS

Test material
     A 2.5  gram sample- of a  white  powder  was  received  in  a small glass
vial labeled "KEPONE,  88% pure,  2.5  g."   Accompanying  instruction
from U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency Research  Biologist Steven C.
Schimmel  directed us  to  assume  100%  purity  for testing  purposes.
Test concentrations  are  reported  here  as  micrograms  (yg)  of KEPONE
per liter (a} of sea  water or  parts  per billion  (ppb).
Test animals
     Oyster embryos were obtained by induced spawning of oysters
which had been conditioned in the laboratory for 6-8 v.'eeks in
flowing, unfiltered natural sea water at 25±2 degrees Celsius (°C).
T_est conditions
     Methods for the acute (48-hour) -oyster embryo test were based
on those of Woe Ike (1972) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(1975).  Individual, sexually mature female oysters held in glass
chambers containing 1 £ of filtered (5 micrometers, ym) sea water

-------
were induced  to spawn  by  increasing  the  water  temperature  in



the chamber from 25°C  to  33°C  over  a  30-minute  interval  in  the


presence of viable sperm  excised  from the  gonad  of  a  sexually



mature male oyster.   Fertilization  occurred  upon  release of the
           \

eggs into the spawning chambers.   Microscopic  examination  con-



firmed fertilization  success  to  be  >95%.   Density of  the embryos



was determined by averaging  three  1-nu Sedgewick-Rafter  counts of



1:99 dilutions (1 mi  embryo  suspension to  99 ml  sea water)  from



the spawning  chamber.



     Concentrations for  the definitive  48-hour  test  were  based



on a preliminary  assay and were  56,  65, 75, 87,  and  100 ppb.   All



test concentrations and  the control  were  triplicated.   Test  con-



tainers were  1-x.  glas,s_ jars,  each  containing  900 nu  of  filtered



(5 ym),  natural  sea water.  Test  concentrations  were prepared  by



pipetting  appropriate  amounts of  KEPONE,  dissolved in  reagent



grade acetone,  into each  test container.  Control  jars  received



900 mi  of  sea  water with  no KEPONE.   Salinity  was  21  parts per



thousand (°/oo)  and initial pH was  8±0.5  for  all test  concentra-



tions and  the  controls.


      For the  definitive  test, each test container was inoculated


with  an  estimated 26,000±1,000 embryos  and then maintained at


20±1°C  in  a  controlled environmental chamber.   After 48 hours


of  exposure,  the  embryos  from each test container were  collected



by  seive (37yrn)5  rinsed  into a 100-nn- graduated cylinder  from



which a  10-ma  aliquot  was transferred to  a small glass  bottle


and preserved  with 0.3 mi. of neutralized  formalin.   The number



of  normally  developed  48-hour embryo present in 1 m;, of each

-------
preserved sample was determined by Sedwich-Rafter counts.  The

percentage reduction of normal 48-hour embryos was determined

as fol 1 ovfs :

               '; umber of normal 43-hour control embryos
          •*     minus the number of normal 48-hour embryos
  Percentage _ in each test concentration
  reduction   ~                                             ^ 100
               Number of normal 48-hour control embryos


The number of normal embryos was based on the average of two counts

of 1  m2.  of preserved sample from triplicate test concentrations

and control..

Statistical  Analysis

     Based on results of the  test, a 48-hour EC50 for eastern

oyster embryos was  calculated.  The test concentrations  were con-

verted to 1ogarithms'and corresponding percentage reduction of

normally developed  48-hour embryos to probits.  The 48-hour EC50

was then calculated by linear  regression.


                       RESULTS AMD DISCUSSION


     A preliminary  test with oyster embryos showed the concentration

of KEPONE  effective  in preventing normal development to be >56<100

ppb (Table  1).   It  also' showed  the volume of acetone used as a  sol-

vent/carrier did  not affect  normal development of embryos (Table  2).

Further,  it  is  interesting  to  note the increased number of normal

embryos  in  the  lower test concentrations  (10, 32, and 56 ppb)  of the

preliminary  test.   We  have  observed this effect in tests with  several

different  compounds  and do  not  know whether it is caused by the  pre-

sence of the toxicant, a synergistic effect between toxicant and

carrier,or  is random error.

-------
     The  definitive test confirmed the results  of the  prelimi-


nary test.   After  48 hours exposure, percentage reduction  of


normally  developed exposed embryos as compared  to the  control was


from 0%  in  the  56  ppb  test concentration to 100% in  87  and  100
           \
ppb (Table  3).   The calculated 48-hour EC50 for eastern  oyster


embryos  exposed to KEPONE in static, unaerated  sea water was  66


ppb with  95%  confidence limits of 60-74 ppb.
               »

     The average  number of  normal  embryos counted  per  1  nil  of  a


1:99 dilution  of  the  embryo  population  collected from  each  test-


concentration  ranged  from 0  in  87  and  100 ppb  to 152  in  56  ppb


(Table 4).  The 48-hour embryos  from  56  ppb test concentrations


appeared to be  smaller and  not  as  well  formed  as the  control;


however, they  were fully shelled and  straight-hinged.  In 65


ppb, although  only an average of 44  normal embryos were  counted,


there were numerous abnormal embryos  present.   The severity of


abnormal development  increased  in  the higher  test  concentrations


of  75, 87, and  100 ppb.

-------
                        LITERATURE CITED





U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.   1975.   Methods for Acute



  Toxicity Tests with Fish, Macroinvertebrates,  end Amphibians.



  Ecological Research Series EPA-660/3-75-009:  61  pp.



Woelke, Charles E.  1972.   Development of a Receiving Water Quality



  Bioassay Criterion Based on the 48-Hour Pacific Oyster (Crassos-



  trea gigas) Embryo.  Technical  Report 9:   93 pp.

-------
TABLE 1.   The acute  toxicity  of  KEPONE to embryos of the
          eastern  oyster  (Grassestrea vi rg1n1ca) exposed
          for 48  hours  in  static,  unaerated sea water.
          Salinity was 21  °/oo  and  temperature, 20±1°C.
          The criterion for effect was the reduction in the
         ^number  of  normal embryos in test concentrations
          as  compared  to  the  number of normal control
          embryos.
       Hominal  concentratien   Percentage reduction of
             (yg/£;ppb)          normal  48-hour embryos3

         Sea  water control                  0

           Acetone  control                   0

                  10       '                 0

                  32            .            0

                  56                        0

                 TOO"           •           100

                 180                      100
               Number of normal -48-hour control embryos
               minus the number of normal  48-hour embryos
 Percentage _ in each test concentration	
  reduction    Number of normal 48-hour control embryos

-------
TABLE 2.   Number of normal  eastern  oyster  (Crassostrea  v1rg1ni ca'
          embryos per milliliter  counted  following  48 hours  of
          exposure to KEPONE  in  static,  unaerated sea water.
          If all  embryos  in  the  initial  inoculum had developed
          normally, the  expected  count would  have been  314±16
         ''embryos per milliliter.   Salinity was 21  °/oo  and
          temperature,  20±1°C.


       Nominal  concentration   Number of normal embryos
{yg/£ ;ppb)
*•
Sea water control A
Sea water control B
Acetone control
10
32
56__
• 100
180
Rep A
198
179
160
206'
285
264
0
0
Rep B
179
175
212
253
280
236
0
0
Avg.
188
177
186
229
283
250
0
0

-------
    TABLE  3.   The  acute  toxicity  of  KEPONE  to embryos of the
              eastern  oyster  ( Cra_ssos trea v 1 r g 1 n 1 c a ) exposed
              for  48  hours  in  static,  unaerated  sea water.
              Salinity was  21  °/oo and  temperature, 20±1°C.
              The  criterion for effect  was  the  reduction in
        x      the  number of normal embryos  in test  concen-
              trations a^s  compared to  the number  of normal
              control  embryosT"
       Nominal  concentration   Percentage reduction of
            (ug/£;ppb)          normal  48-hour embryosa

         Sea water control                  0

                 56                        0

                 65                       68

                 75                       97

                 87                      100

                100                      100



             Number of  normal  48-hour  control embryos
             minus the  number of normal  48-hour embryos
Percentage   in each test concentration	
reduction    ~;"7:~X 100
             Number of  norms!  48-hour  control embryos

-------
TABLE 4.   Number of normal  eastern oyster (Crassostrea v1rgi n1ca )
          embryos per mill-Miter counted following 43 hours of
          exposure to KEPONE in static,  unaerated sea water.
          If all embryos in the initial  inoculum had developed
          normally, the expected count would have been 247±12
          embryos per milliliter.   Salinity was  21  °/oo and
         ^temperature,  20±1°C.
Nominal concentration
( y g / 1 ; p p b )
»
Sea water control
56
65
75
87
100
Number
Rep A
128
151
42
2
0
0
of no
Rep B
138
147
43
8
0
0
rmal emb
Rep C
145
158
46
2
0
0
ryos
Avg
137
152
44
4
0
0

-------
                                                    10
SUBMITTED BY
Bionomics - EG&G, Inc.
Marine Research Laboratory
Route 6,  Box 1002
Pensacola, Florida  32507
March 1976
PREPARED BY:
Tom Heitmuller
                        Biologist
APPROVED BY:
Rod Parrish
                        Director,  Marine
                        Research  Laboratory

-------
               Table  III. Fish Chronic  Values  for  Kepone


                                                  Chronic
                                        Limits     Value
Organism                    Test       (uq/H     (ug/1)          Reterencfe

Shcepshead minnow,             Embryo/   <0.08     <0.08          Hansen, et al.,  1977
Cyprinodon variegatus         larval           ""



Lowest chronic value = <0.08 pg/1  <2^§§. «= 
-------
LETTERS

Kepone: Ha/ard to
Aquutic Organisms

  Rudolph J. Jaeger (Letters, 9 July, p.
94) reports the chronology of mammalian
toxicity tests with Kcpone (chlordecone)
and the exposures of workers at the Life
Science Products  Company  of Hope-
well, Virginia, Initial concern has proper-
ly been focused on the results of toxicity
and carcmogenicity  tests on  rats, rab-
bits, dogs, and  mice and on the disease
that Kcpone produced in exposed work-
ers. \Vc would like to document our con-
cern about  the ha/ard of Kepone  to
aquatic organisms in the James River and
the Chesapeake Bay.
  On-site  tests  of oiganisms taken  from
the  James River  showed  significantly
high   Kepone  concentrations.  These
tests, conducted at the Virginia Institute
of Marine Science and funded by the
Environmental     Protection    Agency
(EPA), revealed that concentrations in
edible tissues of most fresh and estuarine
fin- and shellfish commonly ranged  from
0.1  to more than 1 microgram per gram.
These concentrations exceeded allowable
health  limits  for commercial  and sport
fisheries and forced closure of the river to
some commercial and sport fishing. This
year  Kepone   concentrations  have  in-
creased m anadrofnous fishes as  they
spent more time in the river.
  Further, after laboraloiy  exposures at
the EPA laboratory in Gulf Bree/e, Flor-
ida, we found  that  Kepone,  like other
chlorinated  insecticides,   is  highly
bioaccumuiative and persists in estuar-
ine organisms. Ovsters, grass shnmp, and
n\hes   ha\e  bioconcentrated  Kepone
."ro." ^2:~  to 10.i .":0 t.mes the  :cr,cer'.ra-
tion in the surrounding water. Therefore,
action lc\els for edible  seafoods now in
force might be  reached by  as  little as  5
parts of Kepone per tnllion parts of ua-
ler (nanogranis  perlitei). In Kepone-free
\vatei.  oysteis can  depurate  about 90
percent of the accumulated Kcpone in  4
days,  but fish  may require moie than  3
weeks  to  lose  30  to  50 percent.  Five
weeks  after fertili/ation of sheepshead
minnow eggs containing Kepone, the ju-
venile lish tetained  as  much  as 46 per-
cent of the Kepone  piesent in  the  eggs.
Kepone can  be accumulated by fish to
concentrations  that exceed  those in their
food.
   Kepone is acutely toxic to  estuarine
oigamsms, but  long-term bioassays reveal
that the  ha/ard  to these  organisms is
greatly underestimated by the 96-hour
tests. The concentrations in miciograms
per liter,  estimated to be lethal to 50
percent of the  test animals m  96 hours
(LC-,n), were 6.6 for spot, 70 for sheeps-
head minnows, 10 for an estuarine mys-
)d, 121 for grass shrimp, and moie  than
210 for blue crabs. Kepone was lethal lo
adult  sheepshead minnows exposed to
O.X microgram per  liter foi 2X days. A
significant  number  of  embryos  fiom
adults  exposed  to  1.8  nucrogiams per
liter weie abnormal and died. When em-
bryos were exposed to O.OS microgram
of Kepone per  liter of watei, 36  days
l.ilei,  resulting jusenile  lish were  shorter
than control fish and some exhibited  sco-
liosis. Mysid shrimp exposed for 20.days
to about 0.2  microgram per liter  pro-
duced fewer progeny: with gieater con-
centrations,  their  growth  and survival
were reduced.  We are concerned because
all concenlrations tested thus far in  long-
term expostucs of sheepshead  minnows
and mysids ha\ e reduced sur\ ival. icpro-
duction. or growth.
   The threat of an even greater impact of
Kepone  to  aquatic organisms  in the
James River and expansion of this im-
pact into the Chesapeake Hay, therefore.
is real and  it  may  continue  for  some
years  to come.  It  is  essential   that
we use  knowledge now  available to
attempt to make decisions that may mini-
mi/e the  fuiuie impact of this insecticide
on the aquatic  enviionment.
   D/\\ H3 J. H  \NSI N. A: i KtD J. Wn SUN
                DLI.WWSC R. N'IMMO
                 Si r\ liN C. SCH I.MM EL
                   Low 1.1 t  II. BAHNLK
Ein'irvHint'HUil I'ratcciion Agency.
Environmental Research Lahonilury,
Gut] Breere, Florida 32561
                    ROHbKT Hu'C.eiETT
\'irt;ini(i Institute of Munne Science,
Gloucester Point 23062
        -**>.

-------
                        Authorized Reprint from
                     Special Technical Publication 634
                              Copyright
                American Society for Testing and Materials
                  1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103
                                1977
D.  R. Nimmo,' L. H. Bahner,' R. A. Rigby,'
/. M. Sheppard,' and A. J. Wilson, Jr.l
 Mysidopsis bahia: An  Estuarine
 Species Suitable for  Life-Cycle
 Toxicity Tests to Determine  the
 Effects  of a  Pollutant
    REFERENCE: Nimmo, D. R., Bahner, L. H., Rigby, R. A., Sheppard, J. M., and
    Wilson, A. J., Jr., "Mysidopsis bahia: An Estuarine Species Suitable for Life-Cycle
    Toxicity Tests to Determine the Effects of a Pollutant," Aquatic  Toxicology and
    Hazard Evaluation. ASTM STP 634, F. L. Mayer and J. L. Hamelink, Eds.. American
    Society for Testing and Materials, 1977, pp. 109-116.

    ABSTRACT: This study documents the successful use of a mysid, Mysidopsis bahia,
    for life-cycle toxiciiy tests. These tests were conducted to determine acute and chronic
    toxicities of metal (cadmium) and pesticide (Kepone). Delay in the lormauon of mysid
    brood pouches and release of young were noted in low concentrations <6.4 Mg cad-
    mium/litre. Fewer young produced per female and decreased growth were other indica-
    tors of effects of Kepone.

    KEY WORDS: water analysis,  toxicology, toxicity, cadmium, Kepone, life cycles,
    insecticides
  Many freshwater but a few estuarine or marine animals are available
to the biologist for life-cycle toxicity tests.  Few biologists have worked on
methods of culturing marine animals; therefore, less is known about their
nutritional, behavioral, or environmental requirements than those of fresh-
water species. Life cycles of marine species may be more complex, that is,
many require an estuarine existence as larvae or juveniles, followed by adult
migration to deeper waters offshore to reproduce. Culturing and maintaining
estuarine and marine species require elaborate and expensive facilities be-
cause equipment must  include temperature or salinity controls, anticorro-
sion surfaces, and often special filtration systems. Sufficient quantities  of
  1 Research aquatic biologists, biological  technician, biologist, and supervisory  research
chemist, respectively,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency. Environmental Research
Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Fla. 32561.

-------
 110   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY AND HAZARD EVALUATION


 good quality saltwater may not be as available as freshwater and may be
 more expensive to obtain.
   A water quality criteria  report by the Environmental Protection Agency
 (EPA) [I]2 indicated that only 12 percent of 332 experiments with estuarine
 animals were conducted in flow-through  tests with organic materials and
 that no tests were conducted on entire life cycles of any estuarine or marine
 species. Since this report, an entire life-cycle bioassay using the sheepshead
 minnow, Cyprinodon variegatus, has been accomplished [2].
   We  report progress  in  conducting  life-cycle toxicity  tests with  small
 crustaceans called mysids.  Commonly called an "opossum shrimp" because
 the  female carries  the  young in a brood  pouch  during development,
 Mysidopsis bahia Molenock [3] was first described from West Bay, Galves-
 ton, Texas, and also occurs  in southwest Florida [4]. Dr.  T.  E. Bowman3
 of the Smithsonian  Institution, Washington,  B.C., identified the species.
 We  have completed tests on the  effects of the metal, cadmium, and the
 pesticide, Kepone,  which has been detected in the water, sediments, and
 biota of the James River and Chesapeake Bay [5]. The only other reported
 use  of mysids  for flow-through toxicity tests  was to assay the  toxicity of
 Kraft mill effluent [6].

Life History

  Mysidopsis bahia  is an estuarine species, but it has not been found at
 salinities  below 9 parts  per  thousand salinity [4].  In our first  collection,
 most animais were found in snallow  ponds near the substratum,  oriented
 positively towards the current. However, they made vertical migrations in
 early morning hours co feed  at the surface. Scintiia de Almeida Prado [7]
 found that six species of mysids closely related to M. bahia were primarily
 coastal-water species: the young migrate to surface waters at night,  while
 adults remain  close to the bottom. The vertical  migration of  the young
 facilitates their dispersion towards the sea or into adjacent mangrove areas.
 We have found that  newly released M. bahia are planktonic for the first 24
h; thereafter, they orient to a current and actively pursue Anemia. Feeding
habits of M.  bahia have not been described.  However, a related estuarine
 species, M. almyra, is omnivorous: 31 percent of its digestive tract contents
is vascular plant detritus and 11 percent, copepods and diatoms [4].

Ecological Significance

  The various stages in  mysid life cycles are  important links in estuarine
and  marine food chains, and many studies-emphasize the importance  of
  2 The italic numbers in brackets refer to the  list of references appended to this  paper.
  3Bowman, T. E., Smithsonian Institution,  Washington, D.C., personal communication.
12 Jan. 1976.

-------
                            NIMMO ET AL ON MYSIDOPS1S BAHIA   111

mysids as  food for fishes [8-21].  Stomachs  of young-of-the-year striped
bass, Morone saxatilis, captured from  the York River,  Va., contained  as
much  as 12.7 percent mysids by  volume  [11]. The composition of the
stomach contents by volume of tidewater silversides, Menidia beryllina,  in-
cluded 65  percent mysids during  night  feeding  [4]. Stickney et al  [12]
found that three of four species of flounders captured mysids as a primary
staple in their diets. Percentage of total number of organisms in stomach
contents were: Etropus crossotus, 3.1 percent; Citharichthys spilopterus,  72
percent; Ancylopsetta quadrocellata, 81  percent; and Scopthalmus aquosus,
96.3 percent.  It is obvious that, in  some instances, the loss of  mysids as a
food source would have serious impact on the next trophic level.


Materials and Methods
   Mysids were collected from small  shallow ponds that received a constant
supply of  saltwater from Santa  Rosa Sound near Pensacola,  Florida.
Mysids were cultured  in  the laboratory in  40-litre glass aquaria supplied
with filtered (20 Mm) flowing water (10 to 27 parts per  thousand salinity)
at 18 to 28°C and were fed daily 48-h-old Anemia salina larvae. Overflow
from each  aquarium was through  a standpipe to  which ?. ring of screen
 «,:r..ji£-T.;=n: .-'.' .":! '-"._ :". oi-'.:urc ~.r.z ..:}:.,^ , :...:./,ujasiy lor la months
 without major fluctuations in population density.
   All tests were conducted in intermittent flows from a diluter [13] or con-
 tinuous flow with the  toxicant added by an infusion pump  [14]. As  each
 aquarium  achieved maximum  volume, a self-starting siphon  drained the
 water to a \olu:r.e 01 a^out one  litre in aquarium.  Fluctuating levels, oc-
 curring at  about 30 min each, ensured an  exchange of water within  each
 aquarium and the small chambers devised to retain the mysids. The cham-
 bers consisted of a standard glass petri dish to which a 15-cm-high cylinder
 of Nitex screen  (mesh Number  210) was  attached. To begin each  test,
 twenty to thirty two 48-h-old juveniles, 4 or 5 per chamber, were exposed to
 each concentration.  Acclimation was not necessary since  the  culture and
 test water  were identical. A small stream of compressed air was delivered
 into each chamber to  safeguard  against possible anoxic conditions and to
 create a current that apparently aids orientation of the animals. In record-
 ing daily changes in populations, each chamber was lifted gently from the
 aquaria, water was drained through the Nitex cylinder to the level of the
 petri dish, and  the  chamber  was then  placed on a lighted  counter top.
 Number of live animals by sex, number of females with and without brood
 pouches, and number of young were recorded.
  4Nitex is a registered trademark of Tobler, Ernst and Trabor, Inc., Murray St., New York.
N.Y. Reference to commercial products does not constitute endorsement by the Environmental
Protection Agency.

-------
 112   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY  AND  HAZARD EVALUATION


   We conducted 96-h, flow-through tests beginning with 48-h-old juvenile
 mysids, followed by life-cycle bioassays. The procedures were similar, ex-
 cept that test concentrations in the life-cycle tests  were lower than in the
 96-h tests.
   Water samples were analyzed for Kepone by extracting one litre of sea-
 water  twice with 100-ml volumes of methylene chloride in  a two-litre sep-
 aratory funnel. The combined extracts were concentrated to about 5 ml in
 a Kuderna-Danish Concentrator on a steam table.  Fifteen millilitres of
 benzene was added and the extract  reconcentrated to remove the methylene
 chloride.  Extracts  were  adjusted to appropriate volumes for analyses  by
 electron-capture gas chromatography. Determinations were performed  on
 Varian Aerograph  Model 2100, and 1400 gas chromatographs equipped
 with 182-cm by 2-mm inside diameter glass columns packed with 2 percent
 SP 2100 and 0.75 percent SP2250:  0.97 percent SP2401 on 100/120 mesh
 Supeloport.
   The operating modes were: oven temperature,  185°C; injector tempera-
 ture,  200°C; detector temperature, 210°C; nitrogen carrier-gas flow  rate,
 25 ml/min.  Average recovery of Kepone from saltwater was 85 percent;
 concentrations reported here were not corrected for efficiency of the  ana-
 lytical method. All samples were fortified with an internal standard (dichloro-
 benzophenone) prior to analysis to evaluate the integrity of results.
   Cadmium in water was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry,
 by using the procedure of Nimmo et al [15],
   The LC^s and 95 percent fiducial limits were calculated by linear re-
 gression analysis after probit  transformation.  We employed two-sample t
 tesi to mean brood size;  we used Dunnett's test comparing multiple treat-
 ments with control to mean adult length. Significant (a = 0.05) differences
 were attributed to Kepone.

 Results and Discussion

   Life-cycle toxicity tests, using survival as the criterion for effects,  were
 first conducted with cadmium; the procedures for quantifying effects or the
 reproduction and growth were developed while testing the pesticide, Kepone.
 Seventeen days was chosen as the test requirement  for a life cycle because
 animals in the control aquarium released their brood in this time.  In  sub-
 sequent experiments, we reduced the time required  to complete a life cycle
 by maintaining the temperature at 29 °C.
   For  cadmium, the 96-h  calculated LC50 was 15.5  ^g/litre (95  percent
 fiducial interval, 12.6 to  19.6) at 25 to 28°C and 10 to 17 parts per thou-
 sand salinity. In a 17-day life-cycle test, the LQo was 11.3 ^g/litre (95  per-
 cent fiducial interval, 4.2 to 12.9 at 20 to 28°C and 15  to 23 parts per
thousand salinity (Table  1)). In addition, we observed a 48-h delay in the
formation of brood pouches and a 24-h delay  in the release of brood  in

-------
                            NIMMO ET AL ON  MYS/DOPSIS BAHIA    113
TABLE 1—Survival (numbers) o/ Mysidopsis bahia in measured concentrations oj cadmium
chloride m seuwaier.  Temperature range, 20 to 28°C, salimt\, 15 to 23 pans per thousand.
Cadmium, Mg/litre
Days
0
11
13
17
18
20
23
Control
20
19"
19
19*
19
19
19
4.8
20
19"
19
19fc
19
19
19
6.4
21
16
16"
16
16*
16
16
10.6
20
16°
16
13
11
8*
2
28.0
20
1
0
0
0
0
0
  " Formation of brood pouches noted in the chambers.
  * Young released. Average number of young/female at 23 days was 7.0 in control, 8 in 4.8
Mg/litre, 3 in 6.4 Mg/litre, and 4 in 10.6 Mg/litre. This average was based on all females, not
producing females alone.
females exposed to 6.4 Mg/litre. Although we were unable to prove statisti-
cal significance of these observations, we believe that these delays,  and a
72-h delay in release of brood by females in the  1C.6 ug-'irre, could have
a deleterious effect ecologically since production of maximum brood is out
of phase with food or predator cycles. Also,  fewer young were produced by
females in the 6.4 and 10.6 Mg/litre aquaria than by females in the control
and 4.8 Mg/litre aquaria.
  The 96-h calculated LCSO for  Kepone toxicity to M.  bahia exposed to
Kepone was 10.1  _^. iicrt1 v:*5 percent f.Jjviai interval. 8.1 to 12.4; ^t LL ;o
28°C and 10 to 16 parts per thousand salinity. The 19-day (life-cycle) LC50
was 1.4 Mg/Htre 195 percent fiducial interval, 1.1 to 1.8) at 25 to 28 °C and
10  to 20  parts per thousand salinity (Table 2).  The duration of the test
allowed production of several broods. We discovered that a single female
could commence  brood production  as early  as Day 12 at higher tempera-
tures, and could  produce two additional broods by Day 20; some females
produced as many as 35 young. In the Kepone test, the average number of
young per female  at 20 days was 15.3 in the controls, and 8.9 in 0.39 Mg/
litre. Differences between controls (15.3  juveniles/female) and the 0.39Mg/
litre concentration (8.9 juveniles/female) were significant (a =  0.05, 2-
sample t test).
  In preliminary tests, growth of some mysid individuals  in higher con-
centrations of Kepone appeared to be less than control mysids. To  evaluate
this effect, we began  two separate, 14-day  tests that began by exposing
24-h-old juveniles to  Kepone and concluded by- measuring their  total
lengths (tip of carapace to end of uropod) (Table 3). We found that female
mysids exposed to 0.072 Mg/litre Kepone grew less than the control mysids.
This effect was consistent with apparent effects on  reproductive success

-------
                                           114   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY AND  HAZARD  EVALUATION.
                                           TABLE 2—Survival (numbers) of Mysidopsis bahia in measured concentrations of Kepone in
                                                  seawater. Temperature was 25 to 2S°C; salinity, 10 to 20 parts per thoutnnd.
Kepone, >ig/litre
Days
0
2
4
6
8
10
15
19
Control
32
32
32
32
32
31
30
29
0.39
32
32
32
29
29
29
27
27
1.55
32
26
22
21
21
19
17
16
4.4
32
19
9
6
2
2
1
1
8.7
32
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                           NOTE—Average number of young per producing female at 19 days was 15.3 in control, 8.9 in
                                           0.39 Mg/litre, and 0 in all higher concentrations tested. The difference between control (15,3)
                                           and 0.39 Mg/litre (8.9) was significant (2-sample t test).
                                           TABLE 3—Lengths of 14-day mysids, Mysidopsis bahia. maintained in suKlethal measured
                                           concentrations of Kepone. Measurements were from tip of carapace to end of uropod. Tem-
                                                        perature, .4 to 29°C: :almir\: IS to 27parts per thousand.

                                                                                  Kepone,
Average Length,
mm
Males

Control
7.96

0.026
7.88
S.34

0.072
7.70
3.11-

0.11
7.93
i.lcr

0.23
7.67
a.33

0.41
7.71
8 06J

^S;;f-:i-"r*rri?.gf5fe.-*^:;5i'r"C-S^v"''-''
                            4



                                             'Significant at 95% confidence level compared to control (Dunnett's test).
                                           (fewer juveniles/female). Tests with 13 species of malacostracans (including
                                           5 species of mysids) have established that the number of eggs produced was
                                           a direct function of body length  [16].
                                             Our toxicity data for mysids  exposed to cadmium were similar to those
                                           reported for other species.  For example,  after 96 h, the estimated LCX for
                                           sand  shrimp, Crangon  septemspinosa, and  hermit crab.s, Pagurus longi-
                                           carpus.  to  cadmium  was  320 Mg/litre  [17]. By  comparison, the  30-day
                                           LC50 value for pink shrimp, Penaeus duorarum, was 720 ng/litre, and a 29-
                                           day LC5()  for grass shrimp, Palaemonetes vulgaris,  was  120 ng/litre  U5].
                                           Thus, in either 96-h or life-cycle bioassays,  the sensitivity of M.  bahia to
                                           cadmium was an order  of  magnitude greater than that of the four  species
                                           of decapod  crustaceans  just reported.  In  addition, crustaceans were found

-------
                                                                    NIMMO ET AL  ON MYSIDOPSIS  BAHIA   115


                                        to be more sensitive to cadmium than were echinoderms, annelids,  mol-
                                        lusks, or fishes [17].
       gfc^-rc-r,s.-0;,w^<:.,.:fev4              Mysids were sensitive to Kepone in 96 h (10.1 jug/litre) [5]. The 96-hour
       '„."-.-?•*•_•• v~--.. : •:"'*----^l            LC50 for several  other estuarine organisms were:  6.6 ^g/Htre for  spot
                         _  >           (Leiostomus xanthurus),10 Mg/litre for sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon
                                        variegatus), 121 ^g/litre for grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio), and more
                                        than 210 pg/litre for blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus).
                                          Our data for  cadmium  and Kepone provide  bases for calculation of
                                        application factors. This factor is the numerical ratio of the "safe" concen-
                                        tration (conducted in a long-term toxicity  test) to the acutely  lethal  con-
                                        centration (usually a 96-h toxicity test) [18]. Although application factors
                                        have been used primarily for fishes, sufficient data are lacking to allow
                                        such estimates for invertebrates or for extrapolating between phylogenetic
                                        lines, especially for marine species for which few data exist. However, by
                                        using the procedure given by Eaton [18], the application factor for cadmium
                                        can be calculated by dividing the  concentration that  did not delay produc-
                                        tion  of young mysids  nor decrease  number of  young per female (4.8  pg/
                                        litre) by the 96-h LC50 (15.5 fig/litre). The resulting ratio  is  0.31.  The
                                        application factor for Kepone can be calculated by dividing the  concentra-
                                        tion that had no apparent effect on growth of female mysids (0.026 ^g/litre)
                                        by the 96-h LC^ (10.1  /ug/litre). This ratio  is O.C125. Since both cadmium
                                        and  Kepone are considered persistent and  cumulative, the water  quality
                                        criteria report [1]  has recommended that concentrations of these chemicals
                                        should not exceed 0.05 of the 96-h LQo at  any  time  or place. In addition,
:ti^h:i'7^r-<:-.^t.^-^j^--;^---^            the 24-h average  concentration should not exceed 0.01 -of the  96-h LC-^.
          '  .      .   .     • .i            Our  research with mysids suggests  that extreme  caution should be taken
                                        when estimating application factors (for example. 0.011 without data from
                                        laboratory studies,  because the  laboratory-derived  application factor is
                                        "overprotective"  for cadmium  (0.31)  and  "underprotective" for  Kepone
                                        (0.0025).
                                        General Conclusions

                                          Ease of culture  and maintenance in flow-through bioassays,  apparent
                                        sensitivity to toxicants, and shortness of life cycle are advantages for using
                                        the crustacean Mysidopsis bahia in life-cycle toxicity tests.  Some sublethal
                                        effects observed after prolonged exposure to cadmium and Kepone singly
                                        were: (a) delay in the formation of brood pouches, (b) delay in the release
                                        of young, (c) fewer young produced per female, and (d) reduced growth. In
                                        nature, the loss of mysids due to the direct toxic effects of pollutants or the
                                        indirect  effects on their growth or population size  could  affect the food
                                        supply of many fishes.

-------
                       116   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY AND HAZARD EVALUATION



                       References

                        [/] "Water Quality Criteria 1972," EPA-R-73-033, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S.
                           Government Printing Office, Washingtion. D.C., 1973.
       '                 [2] Hansen, D. J.. EPA-600-3-76-079, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government
   '-   "                    Printing Office. Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 63-76.
                        [.?] Molenock, J.. Tulane Studies in Zoology and Botanv, Vol. 15,  No.  3, 1969, pp. 113-
                           116.
                        [4] Odum, W. E. and Heald, E. J., Bulletin of Marine Science, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1972,
                           pp. 671-738.
                        [5] Hansen, D. J., Wilson. A. J., Nimmo,  D.  R., Schimmel, S.  C., and  Bahner, L.  H.,
                           Science, Vol.  193. 1976, p. 528.
                        \6] Jacobs. F. and Grant, G.  C.,  Water Research. Vol. 8, 1974, pp. 439-445.
                        [7] Scmtila de Almeida  Prado,  M.,  Boleiim de Zoologia e Biologia  Marinha, Brazil. Vol.
                           30, 1973, pp. 395-417.
                        \8} McLane.  W. M., unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of  Florida,  1955.
                        [9] Darnell, R.  M.,  Publications of the Institute of Marine Science.  Vol.  5,  1958,  pp.
                           353-416.
                      [10] Carr. W.  E. S. and Adams, C. A.. Transactions,  American Fisheries Society, Vol. 102.
                           No. 3, 1973. pp.  511-540.
                      U/l Markle, D. F. and Grant,  G. C., Chesapeake Science, Vol. 11, No. 1. 1970. pp. 50-54.
                      112} Stickney.  R. 'R., Taylor, G. L., and Heard,  R. W., Ill, U.S. Fish and  Wildlife Service
                           Fishery Bulletin.  Vol. 72, No.  2,  1974. pp. 515-525.
                      \13] Mount. D. 1.  and Brungs, W. A., Water Research. Vol. 1,  1967, pp. 21-29.
                     ,{14} Bahner. L. H., Craft. C. D., and  Nimmo, D. R., Progressive Fish-Culturist. Vol.  37,
                           No. 3, 1975. pp.  126-129.
                      [/5] Nimmo, D. R., Lightner, D. V., and Bahner, L. H., Physiological Responses of Marine
                           Biota  to Pollutants, F. J. Vernberg. A. Calabrese, F. P. Thurberg, and W. B. Vernberg,
                           Eds.,  Academic Press, 1977," pp. 131-183.
                      {10}  Jensen. J. P..  Mcddclelser Fra Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havundersogehtr.  Vol. 2,  No.  19,
                           1958.  pp.  1-25.
.«v~S                 \17]  Eisler. R., Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.  Vol. 28, No. 9  1971
 "^                      pp. 1225-1234.
                      [18}  Eaton. J.  G.. Bioassay Techniques and  Environmental Chemistry. C.  E. Glass. Ed.,
                           Ann Arbor Publishers. Inc., 1973,  pp. 107-115.

-------
 Short   Papers  and  Notes
 Toxicity and  Uptake  of  Kepone  in Marine
 Unicellular Algae1
 ABSTRACT:  Four species of marine unicellular al-
 gae were exposed to Kepone in laboratory  bioassays.
 EC50 values after  seven days'  growth, in mg/Iiter
 (ppm), were: Chlorococcum sp., 0.35; Dunaliella ler-
 tiolecta, 0.58; \it:schia sp., 0.60; Thalassiosirapseu-
 donana, 0.60. When exposed  to 100 jig/liter (ppb)
 Kepone for 24 hr. residues associated with the algae, in
 mg/kg (ppm) wet weight, were: Chlorococcum sp., 80;
 D. (erliolecta, Z3; i\itzschia sp., 41; T. pseudonana,
 52.

    Kepone® (decachlorooctahydro-1,3.4-metheno-2H-
 cycloSuta jcdj pemalene-2-one) is used for  control of
 banana  and  potato  pests and as an ant and roach
 killer. The insecticide has been reported in  water and
 biota of the  Appomatox and James  rivers. Virginia
 (Environmental  Protection Agency  1975). Kepone is
 structurally similar to the insecticide mirex (dodecach-
 lorooctahvdro-l.3,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta  [cd] pen-
 talene) and may be a product of its  photodegradation
 (Ivie etal. 1974).
   We exposed four species of marine unicellular algae
 to  Kepone to determine its effects on growth and its
 uptake  by phytoplankton. Since algae are  food for
 animals, oxygenate svater. and  regulate nutrients, an
 effect on them  could affect physical,  chemical,  and
              Materials and Methods
   Algae tested were Chlorococcum sp. (Milford "C").
 Dunaliella icrnolecta (chlorophues). Nnzscliia sp. (LB
 684). and Thalassiosira pseudonana (bacillanophytes)
 All were obtained from the Culture Collection ot Al-
 gae. Indiana University.
   in growth studies, algae were grown either in' (1) 25
 ml of medium m optically matched test tubes shaken at
 approximately 60 excursions  per minute  on  a  New
 Brunswick Model G shaker fitted with an  ErlAngle®
 (New Brunswick  Scientific Co.. New Brunswick.  Con-
 necticut) clamp,  or (2) 50  ml of medium in  125-ml
 Erienmeyer flasks shaken at approximately 60 excur-
 sions per minute. In the (ormer. optical density at 525
 nm on a Fisher electrophotometer was determined each
 day  for seven days alter  inoculation;  in  the latter.
 optical density was  determined  after  seven days  of
 growth.
   Growth medium was artificial  seawater of 30 parts
 per  thousand  salinity  with  full  and  half-nutrient

   ' Contribution No. 292 from the Environmental Re-
 search  Laboratory - Gulf Breeze
   ® Registered  trademark. Allied  Chemical  Corp.,
 New York. Mention of trade names in this publication
 does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Environ-
 mental Protection Agency.
 strengths (Hollister et al. 1975). Temperature was 20°
 ± 0.5°C under 5.000 lux illumination from cool, white
 fluorscent tubes  with alternate 12-hr periods of  light
 and darkness. Technical grade Kepone was  added in
 0.1 ml  acetone and 0.1  ml acetone was added to all
 control  cultures.  This concentration of acetone did not
 affect growth. During  seven growth tests,  each expo-
 sure was performed three  times  Concentrations  that
 reduced growth by 50 per cent  (EC50) after seven  days
 were calculated (American Public Health Association
 1971).
   In uptake studies.  12 cultures of each alga were
 grown in 100 ml of full nutrient medium for  six days.
 All that time, cell numbers were between 2 x 105and 3
 x 105 cells/ml, and Kepone,  in 0.1  ml acetone,  was
 then added  at the  nominal concentration of  100 /xg/
 liter. This was well below its solubility limit of 2-4 mg/
 liter in  seawater  (May. unpublished). On the seventh
 day.  the  algae  were  harvested  by  centnfugation,
 washed  four times with uncontaminated medium, and
 analyzed for kepone  by gas  chromatography. Each
 value in Table 1  is the average of  12 replications.
   For residue analysis, algae samples were weighed in
 125 mm x  15 mm (O D.) screw-top test tubes  and
 extracted with two 5-ml portions of acetomtrile for 30
 sec with a Model PT 10-ST \Villems Polvtron (Bnnk-
 — - '".^rurnents. '•V.-^:l:ury . Ne\v Yi -\   T; _•   • • • • -
 ;:..-- extract was transferred to a 250-ml  separators
 tunnel after centnfugation, and the  algae again ex-
 tracted, first with 5  ml and then with 10 ml ot  j;ctonc.
 After each  extraction,  the  tube was centrifuged.  and
 the extract placed in the separatory funnel. Then,  100
 ml of 2.0%  aqueous sodium sulfate and  10 ml of 1:1
 diethyl ether-petroleum ether was added, and  the mix-
 ture sliaken for  1  minute. Alter  the solvent  phases
 separated, the lower aqueous phase was drained into a
 250-ml beaker and the  upper layer collected in a 25-ml
 Kuderna-Damsh  concentrator  tube. The ether extrac-
 tion was repeated three times with 5 ml of  1:1 diethyl
 ether-petroleum  ether.  The combined extracts were
 concentrated to dryness by placing the tube in a water
 bath at 45°C and evaporating the solvent with a gentle
 stream of nitrogen. The  residue was  transferred  to a
 200mm x 9 mm (l.D.) Chromatlex® column (Kontes
 Glass Co.  Vmeland.  N.J.)  containing  3.0  gm of
 Flonsil® overlain by 2  0 gm of anhydrous sodium  sul-
 fate. The column  was first washed with 10 ml of hexane
 and the residue transferred with four 0.5-ml volumes of
 5% diethyl  ether in hexane to  remove PCB and pesti-
 cides. Kepone was removed by a second elution with 40
 ml of 1 % methanol in benzene  Extracts concentrated
or diluted to appropriate volume were  analyzed b\
electron-capture gas chromatography on  Vanan Aero-
graph Models 2100 and .1400 Gas  Chromatographs
equipped with  182  cm  x 2 mm (l.D.) glass  columns
packed with 2%  SP2100 and  0.75% SP2250:0.97%
                                                222
Chesapeake Science  Vol  18, No. 2,  June, 1977

-------
                                                                      Short Papers and Notes
                                                                                                 223
TABLE  1.  Depression  of  growth of marine unicellular alga by Kepone  and  concentrations of Kepone in
algae after exposure to 100 /ng/'l  for 24 hours.
Algae
Chlorococcum sp.
D. lernolecia
Nitzschia sp.
T. pseudonana
EC50° /xg/1
0.35 (0.27-0.40)
0.58 (0.51-0.64)
0.60 (0.53-0.66)
0.60 (0 50-0.70)
Cell Residue ^.g/g
80
23
41
52
Concentration Factor
800
230
410
520
" Range in parentheses.
SP2401 on  100/120 mesh Supelcoport®. The opera-
tion conditions were: oven temperature, 185°C: injec-
tor temperature, 200°C; detector temperature, 215°C;
nitrogen carrier gas flow rate, 25 ml/mm.  Al! samples
were fortified  with an internal standard (dichioroben-
zophenone) prior to analysis to evaluate the integrity of
results. The average  recovery rate  of  Kepone  from
fortified algae  was 85%. Residue concentrations were
calculated on  a  wet weight basis without correction
factor for percentage recovery.

                      Results
   Effects and  uptake of Kepone are given in Table 1.
Because results  from  bioassays  with full and  half-
strength nutrient media were identical, the data  were
combined. Seventh-day EC50 values are representative
of effect because the degree of growth inhibition was
constant from  day to  day. Chlorococcum  sp. was the
most sensitive species: its  EC50  values  never over-
lapped  those of  the others.  The  EC50  values of the
other species were nearly identical.
   Chlorococcum  sp.  also  accumulated  the  greatest
sure, and all differences, except between Niizschia sp.
and T. pseudonana, are highly significant statistically
(t-test for two means, Brownlee 1965).

                    Discussion
   Butler (1963) stated that  1 mg/liter of  Kepone re-
duced carbon fixation by estuanne phytoplankton by
^5 per cent aitcr exposure lor 4 hr. Our data show that
toxicity occurred at much lower concentrations and that
algae can accumulate the chemical from water. Since
EC50 concentrations were higher than those reported
from the Appomatox and  James rivers (Environmen-
tal Protection Agency 1975).  Kepone may have little
effect on phytoplankton in the field. However,  uptake
by algae could result in accumulation at higher trophic
levels.
                ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

   We thank Shelley Alexander, Sharon Edmisten. Ka-
 thy Nolan and Jerrold Forester for their technical as-
 sistance.

                    REFERENCES
 AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION.  1971. Stan-
   dard Methods  for the Examination  of  Water and
   Wastewater. Thirteenth ed. APHA, New York. 874
   P-
 BROWNLEE, K. A. 1965. Statistical Theory and Meth-
   odology in Science and Engineering. John Wiley and
   Sons, New York. 590 p.
 BUTLER, P. A. 1963. Pesticide-Wildlife Studies.  U.S.
   Department of the Interior, Circular  167, Washing-
   ton, D.C. pp.11-25.
 ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY.  1975.  Fact
   sheet on Kepone levels found in environmental sam-
   ples from the Hopewell,  Va. area. Health Effects
   Research Laboratory.  EPA,  Research  Triangle
   Park. NC, unpublished, 15 p.
 HOLLISTF.R.  T. A.. G. E. WALSH. AND J. FORESTER.
   1975. Aiuex jnu marine uniccilu.^r.. _..;:. J..VL.JT...HI-
   tion, population growth, and oxygen evolution. Bull.
   Environ. Comam.  Toxicol. 14:753-759.
 IVIE.  G  W.,  H  W. DOROUGH,  AND E.  G.  ALLEY.
   1974.  Photodecomposition of  mirex  on silica gel
   chromatoplates  exposed to  natural  and  artificial
   light. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22:933-936.
 MAY, J.  R. Pesticide  Reference  Standards  Manual
   Nat. Commun. Disease Cen.. U.S. Pub. Health Ser..
   Pest. Repository, Pest. Res. Lab..  Pernne. FL. un-
   published

 GERALD E.  WALSH,  KAREN  AINSWORTH AND ALFRED
 J. WILSON
 Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Research Laboratory —Gulf Breeze
Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561

-------
 224
               Short Papers and Notes
 Acute  Toxicity of  Kepone®  to
 Four Estuarine Animals1

 ABSTRACT:  Recent  contamination  of  the  James
 River estuan. Virginia, with Kepone prompted acute
 flow-through bioassays to determine the 96-hour toxic-
 it} of the insecticide to four estuarine species native to
 that  ecosystem.  The species and their 96-hour  LC50
 values were: grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio), 121
 fig/liter;  blue crab (Callinectes  sapidus}, >210 /xg/
 liter; sheepshead  minnow  (Cyprinodon  variegaius),
 69.5 fig/liter; and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) 6.6 p.g/
 liter. Surviving  animals  were anahzed  for  Kepone.
 Average bioconcentration factors (the concentration of
 Kepone in tissues divided by the concentration  of Ke-
 pone measured in  seawater) were:  grass shrimp, 698;
 blue  crab 8.1; sheepshead minnow, 1.548; and spot,
 1,221.

                   Introduction
   Few published data are available on Kepone toxicity
 to  estuarme  animals. Butler (1963) reported  EC50
 values (based on mortality or loss of equilibrium in 48
 hours for shrimp and on inhibition of shell deposition in
 96 hours  for oysters)  of 85 ^tg/liter for brown shrimp
 (Penaeus aziecus):  57  /^g/Iiter and 15 fig/liter for east-
 ern oysters (Crassostrea nrginica) exposed at  seawater
 temperatures of  14°C and 31°C. respectively. Twenty
 percent of the blue crabs (Calhnecies sapidus) exposed
 to  1,000  jug/liter Kepone died  in 48 hours. Butler's
 data  'vere derived  from  !n-«'.-t!-rr".^h b'oassnys ^nd
 based on nominal, not  measured, concentrations of
 Kepone in seawater
   Recent discharge of the insecticide. KeponeK. into
 the James Riser  estuary.  Virginia has resulted in con-
 tamination of that system's water, sediment, and biota.
 This  contamination raised questions about the acute
 and chronic effects  of Kepone on the aquatic life m the
 t:stuar\ and the potential  uunger tu humans tn  eating
 contaminated animals.
   In  Januap, l'17'i. we  initialed flow-thr"'1*:!'.  bioas-
 says to determine  bioconcentration and  acute  toxic
 effects of  Kepone on  representative species found in
 the James River estuary These were grass shrimp (Pa-
 laemoneles pugio),  blue  crab (Callmecles sapidus),
 sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus),  and spot
 (Leiosiomus xanthurus).

              Methods and  Materials
   Acute  toxicity was determined by exposing 20 ani-
 mals per  aquarium  to  different concentrations of Ke-
   ® Registered Trademark for decachlorooctahydro-
 1.3.3-metheno-2H-c\clobuta (cd) pentalen-2-one. Al-
 lied Chemical Company. 40 Rector Street, New York.
 New York 10006  Mention of commercial products
 does not constitute endorsement b\ the Environmental
 Protection Agency.
   1 Contribution No  293, Environmental  Research
 Laboratory, Gulf Breeze.
 pone for 96 hours in flow-through bioassays similar to
 those described by Lowe et al. (1972). All test animals
 were acclimated to laboratory conditions for at least ten
 days prior to testing. The temperature and salinity of
 seawater in which they were  held were allowed to vary
 with those of Santa Rosa Sound. Florida, during accli-
 mation and testing  Our acclimation and  testing proce-
 dures were compatible with those of Standard Methods
 (A.P.H.A. 1971). Ail Vest animals were captured in the
 vicinity of the Gulf Breeze Laboratory and samples
 contained no detectable Kepone (<0.02 Mg/g)- During
 acclimation, test animals were fed frozen brine shrimp
 daily. Animals were not fed during  the tests, but could
 obtain  food (plankton and  other paniculate  matter)
 from the  unfiltered seawater. Seawater was pumped
 from Santa Rosa  Sound into  a constant-head trough in
 the laboratory and delivered  to each 18 liter aquarium
 by a calibrated siphon that delivered approximately 68
 luer/hr. One  control and five  experimental  aquaria
 were used in each test. Stock solutions of Kepone
 (88% pure), in reagent-grade acetone, were metered
 into experimental aquaria at the rate of 60 ml/hr.
   The  96-hour LC50 values  were determined for both
 nominal and measured concentrations of Kepone  in
 seawater.  Nominal concentrations  were those calcu-
 lated to be in seawater. based on the concentration  of
 the stock solution, plus the stock solution and seawater
 flow rates  The LC50 values were based on measured
 Kepone concentrations de'crri!"ed  K  chemical analy-
 sis of the exposure water. Mortality  data were  sub-
 jected to probit anaUs;" to determine LC50 values and
 their 45*7 confidence limits (Finnev 19~M).
   At the  end of  each 96-mnir test, surviving animals
 from each  concentration were sacrificed, rinsed with
 acetone, and  pooled  as a single sample for  residue
 analysis.
   \\aier samples were aruhzed o;    - .
 of seawater twice with 100 ml of rrothvlene cnionJe.
 The combined extracts wore concer.ira'.eu to about 5 mi
 in a Kuderna-Danish  Concentrator on a steam table.
 Fifteen  milliliters  of benzene  were  added and  the ex-
 tract reconcentrated to remove the methylene chloride
 The extract was cleaned up  on a Flonsil Column as
 described below.
   Tissues of shrimp, crabs, or fish were weighed in 150
 mm  x  25  mm (O.D.) screw-top test tubes  and ex-
 tracted  twice with 5 ml volumes of  acetomtnle for 30
 seconds with a model PT 10-ST  Willems  Polytron
 (Bnnkman Instruments, \\estbury. New York). The
 mixture was centifuged and the acetomtrile transferred
 to a 250-ml separatory funnel. After the second extrac-
 tion, the tissue was extracted with one 5-ml and one 10-
 mi volume  of acetone. After each acetone  extraction
 the tube was centnfuged and  the acetone  added to the
 250-ml  separatory funnel.  To the combined extracts,
 100 ml of 2.0% aqueous sodium sulfate and 10 ml of
 1:1 diethyl ether-petroleum  ether  were  added. The
separatory funnel was shaken for one minute. After the
solvent phases had separated, the lower aqueous phase
Chesapeake Science  Vol 16, No  2,  June, 1977

-------
                                                                      Short Papers and Notes
                                                                                                  225
TABLE 1. Toxicity of Kepone to and uptake by four estuarine organisms after 96 hours exposure.
                                  Water Concentration (^g/liter)
                                                               Mortality
                                                                     '
             Species
                                    Nominal
                                                 Measured
                                     Whole-Body
                                     Residue (#ig/g
                                     wet weight)
                                    Bioconcentration
                                        Factor
Grass    shrimp   (Palaemoneles
  pugio)
Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus)
Sheepshead  minnow  (Cyprino-
  don variegatus)
Control

    13.5
    24.
    42.
    75.
   135.

Control
    42.
    75.
   135.
   187.
   240.

Control
 ND°

 12.
 15.
 39.
 69.
121

 ND
no.
164.
210.

 ND
 0
 0
 0
 5
50

 0
 0
10
 5
 0
 0
ND"

  5.1
 14.
 29.
 42.
 94.

ND
  0.85
  1.7
  1.3

ND
                                                                                              425
                                                                                              933
                                                                                              744
                                                                                              609
                                                                                              111
                                                                                          x = 698
                                                                                                 7.7
                                                                                                10.4
                                                                                                 6.2
                                                                                             x = 8.1
10.
18.
32.
56.
100.

Spot (Leioslomus xanthurus) Control
2.4
4.2
7.5
13.5
24,

7.1
14.
23.
51.5
78.5

ND
1.5
3.4
4.4
7.8
15.9

0
0
5
20
65

0
5
10
45
40
95

11.2
20.9
44.4
63.6
118.4

ND
1.7
3.2
7.0
10.8
16.8

1577
1493
1930
1235
1506
x = 1548
-
1133
941
1591
1385
1057
x = 1221
  ° ND —non detectable: <0 02 .us/liter in water. <0 02 ,uc/g in t'
TABLE 2  96-hour toxictty of Kepone to several estuarine animals in flowing seawater bioassays. The 95^7
confidence intervals are  in parentheses. Animal sizes are rostrum-telson length  for shrimps, carapace width
for crabs, and standard length for fishes.
Species
Grass shrimp (Palaemoneles
pugio )
Blue crab (Callinectes sapi-
dus)
Sheepshead minnow (Cypri-
nodon variegatus)
Spot (Leiosiomus xanthurus)
Size
(x. mm)
27.8
34.3
20.0
33.9
Nominal 96-hour Measured 96-hour
LC50 in ng/lner (,9fZLC50 in pig/hter (95 Tr
Confidence Limit) Confidence Limit)
134.8
(114.1-193.9)
>240
83.0
(67.9-115)
10.5
(8.3-14.0)
120.9
(103.0-171.6)
>210
69.5
(56.3-99.5)
6.6
(5.3-8.8)
Temperature
(x. °C)
20.0
19.0
18.0
25.0
Salinity
(x. "/„,')
16.0
20.0
15.0
18.0
 was drained into a 250-ml beaker and the upper ether
 layer was collected in a 25-ml Kuderna-Danish concen-
 trator tube. The ether extraction was repeated three
 times with  5 ml of 1:1 diethyl  ether petroleum ether
 The combined extracts were concentrated just to dry-
 ness b\ placing the concentrator tube in a water bath at
                45°C and blowing off the solvent with a gentle stream
                of nitrogen. The residue was transferred to a 200 mm x
                9 mm (l.D.)  Chromaflex column (Kontes Glass Co.)
                containing 2.3 gm of Flonsii topped with  2.0  gm of
                anhydrous sodium sulfate.  The column initially  was
                washed with  10 ml  of hexane and  the  residue trans-

-------
226
              Short Papers and Notes
ferred with four 0.5 ml volumes of 5% diethyl ether in
hexane  The column  was eluied  with 20 ml  of 5%
diethyl ether in hexane to remove PCB and pesticides.
Kepone was eiuted in a second elution of 40 ml of 1 %
methanol  in benzene. Extracts were  concentrated or
diluted to appropriate volumes for analyses by electron
capture  gas chromatography.
   Determinations were obtained by Vanan Aerograph
Model 2100 and 1400 Gas Chromatographs equipped
with 182 cm x 2 mm (I.D.). glass columns packed with
2% SP2100 and 9.75%  SP2250:  9.97% SP2401  on
100/120 mesh Supelcoport. The operating parameters
were: oven temperature  185°C, injector temperature
200°C. detector temperature 216°C, and  nitrogen car-
rier gas  flow rate 25 ml/min
   The average recovery rate of Kepone from fortified
tissue was  87%; from water. 85%. Residue concentra-
tions were calculated on a wet-weight basis without a
correction factor for percentage recovery. All samples
were fortified with an internal standard (dichloroben-
zophenone) prior to analysis to evaluate the integrity of
the results.

              Results and Discussion
   Kepone, at concentrations tested, was acutely toxic
to shrimp  and  fishes but not to blue crabs. The LC50
values varied wideh among species. Spot were the most
sensitive with  a  96-hour LC50 of 6.6  ^.g/liter; the
sheepshead minnow LC50 was over ten  times higher
(69.5 /xg/liter). The two crustaceans  were less sensi-
tive. Grass shrimp LC50 was  120.9  /^.g/liter,  and  no
significant  mortality was observed in blue crabs at mea-
sured concentrations as high as 210 /ig/liter (Tables 1
differed, the s\ mptoms of Kepone poisoning were simi-
lar. An early symptom was lethargic behavior followed
by loss of equilibrium. These symptoms occurred in
sheepshead minnows at 48 hours in 56 and 1 00 /j.g/liter
concentrations and  96 hours in 18  and 32 ^.g/liter
concentrations. Spot exhibited  the  symptoms  in  48
hours when  exposed to 7.5,  135 and 24  ^g/liter Ke-
pone. An advanced stage of poisoning was evident in
dark coloration of  portions  of  the fish's body. This
color change was striking  in that some fish had normal
coloration on one side ot  their bodies, while the other
side was nearly black with a sharp line of demarcation.
Some spot and sheepshead minnows were darkened in
only one quadrant of the body; for example, the lett
side posterior to the pectoral  fins. These color changes
were always more marked and appeared earlier in the
higher Kepone concentrations. Hansen et al.  (1977)
also  noted color  changes  in  sheepshead minnows ex-
posed to a lower Kepone concentration (0.8 ^.g/lner)
over a longer  duration (11  days). The  same authors
also  noted that growth, reproduction and survival of
sheepshead minnows were affected in 36 days by Ke-
pone concentrations as low as 0 08 /xg/liter, which is
0.001 of our sheepshead minnow LC50 (69.5 pig/liter).
If we assume  that the same ratio exists for spot as
Hansen et al. reported for sheepshead minnows, then
the no-effect level for spot would be less than 0.007 ^.g/
liter based on our spot LC50 (6.6
   No color changes were observed in the two crusta-
ceans although they also  were  lethargic in Kepone
concentrations greater than 75 /j.g/liter.
   Kepone was bioconcentrated by all test animals in
96 hours, although bioconcentration  factors (concen-
tration of Kepone in tissue divided by measured Ke-
pone in water) varied between species (Table 1). (The
bioconcentration  factors for  fish were similar, x  =
1200-1500). The two fishes bioconcentrated Kepone
an average of 1.7 to  2.2  times  the bioconcentration
factor for the grass shrimp and 150 to 190  times that
measured in the blue crab. This  difference in biocon-
centration  has been  noted in similar bioassays with
other organochlonne  insecticides. Schimmel  et  al.
(1976) reported that sheepshead minnows,  spot, and
pmfish (Lagodon riiomboides) bioconcentrated 4 to 70
times more heptachlor than  grass  shrimp or pink
shrimp (Penaeus duorarum). A similar relationship oc-
curred when some of the same species were exposed to
toxaphene (Schirnmel et al.. in press) and dieldrin (Par-
nsh et al. 1974) in 96-hour bioassays. The reason for
an extremely low bioconcentration factor in the blue
crab compared to grass shrimp is not  known.
   Further  studies over  a  longer period of time are
required to better understand the more subtle effects of
Kepone on estuanne animals. One reason for this as-
sessment is that most deaths occurred  after 48 hours in
our tests. These studies should include. (1)  long-term
bioconcentration studies; (2)  bioassays which include
the hatching and early development  of  an  estuanne
animal such as spot; and (3) studies to determine move-
ment of Kepone  through an estuanne food web.
                ACKNOWLEDG" t^*-?

   The aui.iors ^ ..•>;: c- .XvO^r...^ ne s.ipificant contri-
butions of Jerrold Forester and Johnnie Knight in the
chemical  analyses of water and tissue samples and of
James M Patrick. Jr., for help in the  bioassays.
                 LITERATURE CITED

AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION.  1971.  Stan-
  dard Methods for the  Examination of Water and
  Wastewater. American Public Health Association.
  14th ed. Washington, D.C. 1193 p.
BUTLER.  P.  A.  1963.  Pesticide-Wildlife  Studies-A
  Review of Fish and Wildlife  Service Investiaations
  During 1961 and  1962. U.S.  Fish and Wildhfe Cir-
  cular. 167 pp.  11-25.
FINNEV, D. J. 1971. Probit Analysis. Cambridge Uni-
  versity Press. Great Britain. 333 p.
LOWE, J. I,,  P. R. PARRISH, J. M. PATRICK. JR., AND J.
  FORESTER.  1972. Effects of the polychlonnated bi-
  phenyl  Aroclor®  1254 on  the  American  oyster,
  Crassosirea Mrgmica. Mar. Biol.  (Berlin)  17:209-
  214
HANSEN. D. J., L. R GOODMAN AND  A. J. WILSON.
  JR.  1977.  Kepone: Chronic effects on embryo. fr\,
  juvenile and aduks sheepshead minnows. Cypnno-
  don variegarus. Chesapeake Sci.  18 (2):227-232.
PARRISH,  P.  R., J  A. COUCH, J.  FORESTER, J,  M.

-------
                                                              Short Papers and Notes           227

  PATRICK.  JR.. AND G.  H.  COOK.  1974  Dieldnn.      and toxicity of Toxaphene in several estuarme orga-
  Etfects on several estuarme organisms. Proc. 27th      nisms. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (in press).
  Annu. Conf.  Southeastern  Assoc.  Game  Fish.
  Comm. 427-434.                                               STEVEN C  SCHIMMEL
SCHIMMEL, S. C.. J.  M.  PATRICK. JR.,  AND J.  FOR-                        AND
  ESTER. 1976. Heptachior: Toxicity to and uptake by                 ALFRED J. WILSON. JR.
  several estuarme organisms.  J.  Toxicol  Environ.                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Health. 1:955-965.                                             Environmental Research Laboratory
	.  J. M. PATRICK. JR., AND J. FORESTER Uptake                 Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561

-------
 Kepone®: Chronic  Effects  on Embryo,  Fry,
Juvenile, and Adult Sheepshead Minnows
(Cyprinodon  variegatus)l
ABSTRACT:  \Ve investigated the Joxicity of Kepone
to, and uptake by embryo, fry, juvenile, and adult
sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon variegatus) using
intermittent-flow toxicity tests. Concentrations of Ke-
pone and percentage of adult fish surviving in a 28-day
exposure were: Control,  95%;  0.05 fig/liter, 95%;
0.16 Mg/Hter. 100%; 0.80 /ig/liter, 78%; 1.9 Mg/"'»er,
20%; and 7.8 ftg/liter and 24 fig/liter, 0%. Concentra-
tion factors (concentrations in fish divided by concen-
trations measured in water) for adult  fish  averaged
5,200 (range 3,100 to 7,000). Symptoms of poisoning
included scoliosis. darkening of the posterior one-third
of the boch. hemorrhaging near the brain and on the
body, edema, fin-rot, uncoordinated swimming, and
cessation of feeding. Vdults surviMns the first exposure

in1;, jnti -:irvi.ai  and growth "i ir\ ; jnd died e\en  when incubated in Kepone-free
water. Kepone in water was not as lethal to progeny as
to adults: 36-da> LC50 for juveniles was 6.7 /ig/liter;
Ic5-dav I.t'50 for adult1..  1.3 /i'i'liicr. However, the
average standard lenglh  of juvenile fish  was signifi-
cant!) reduced b> exposure to 0.08 ^ig of Kepone/liter
of water; some fish developed scoliosis. Concentration
factors in juvenile sheepshead minnows averaged 7,200
and increased from 3.600 to 20,000 as exposure con-
centrations decreased.

                  introduction
   Kepone.  decachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-2H-
cyclobuta cd pentalene-2-one. has been found recently

   ® Registered trademark. Allied Chemical Corpora-
tion. 40""Rector Street. New York. New York 10006.
Kepone used was purchased from Chem Service. West
Chester. PA as 99% pure. Our analyses indicated 88%
purity Mention of trade names or commercial products
does not constitute endorsement by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
   1 Contribution No.  295, Environmental Research
Laboratory, Gulf Breeze.
 in estuarine organisms  in the James River, Virginia
 (Hansen et al. 1976). The acute toxicity of this insecti-
 cide to estuarine fishes and invertebrates  has  been
 investigated  (Butler 1963;  Schimmel  and  Wilson
 1977), but the chronic effects of Kepone on estuarine
 fish have not.
   Our study was conducted to determine:  1) the ef-
 fects of Kepone exposure on survival and reproduction
 of adult sheepshead minnows, 2) the effect on survival
 and growth of embryos, fry, and juvenile fish spawned
 from exposed adults, and 3) the extent of bioconcentra-
 tion in adults and progeny.

              Materials and Methods
                   TEST AVIMM.S

 Environmental  Research  Ljooniiur..  Ou.. _>r-^..v.
 Florida and acclimated in test aquaria in 30°C water tor
 15 days before exposure. Mortality during acclimation
 was less than 1 percent,  and the fish fed, spawned, and
 otherwise  boh^ed ^ortia'!-. Tcved fi-ih a\ erjced 40
 mm standard liij:, • and 2.3 g  Adult  tisn  and  tneir
 food. Biorell® and Irozen adult brine shrimp (Anemia
 so/mo).  COT.- • __ •• . Jotectav-'c (--  0 0:  ^ y- Kj-
 pone, other chlorinated  insecticides or PCB's.

                 ADULT EXPOSURE
   We exposed 32 female and 32 male fish in aquaria
 containing zero, 0.16, 0.80, 1.9. 7.8, and 24 /ig/liter of
 Kepone. and 108 fish to  0.05 /j.g/hter for four weeks in
 an intermittent-flow toxicity test.  Our apparatus was a
 modified model of that used by Schimmel et al. (1974).
 We delivered Kepone, 0.0088 ml of the solvent tnethy-
 lene gtycol, and 1.5 liter of filtered 30°C (±  1°C)
 seawater averaging 15"/(1(,  salimt  (range 8-26 "/,»,) to
 each 70 liter aquarium during each cycle of the appara-
 tus. Water and solvent without Kepone were delivered
 to the control aquarium  Number of cycles per day for
 the adult exposure averaged 440.

       EMBRYO. FRY, AND  JUVENILE EXPOSURE
  To determine the  effect of Kepone on sheepshead
minnow  embryo,  fry, and  juvenile  survival, we en-
Chesapeake Science  Vol. 18, No 2,  June, 1977

-------
228
              Short Papers and Notes
hanced  egg  production b\ injecting hormones in ex-
posed adult fish, fertilizing  the  eggs  artifically, and
monitoring their development in  Kepone for 36 days.
Twenty female sheepshead minnows exposed to none.
0.05. 6.16. or 0.80 fig/liter of Kepone and 8 females
exposed to 1.9 ^tg/hter were injected with 50 1.  U. of
human chonomc gonadotrophic hormone on exposure
days 25 and 27 (Hansen et al. 1974). On the 28th day
of exposure eggs were stripped manually from injected
fish and were fertilized in control water with sperm
from excised macerated testes from ten or more males
exposed to 0.8 /^g/liter or less of Kepone and from five
fish exposed to  1.9  ^.g/hter.  Some spawned adult fish
from each concentration were frozen for chemical anal-
yses ot Kepone content.
   Embryos were placed in appropriate aquaria previ-
ously  used for adult fish to  determine the effects of
Kepone 1) in water: 2) within the egg; and 3) in both
eggs and  water  on embryos,  fry.  and juvenile fish.
Twenty  embryos from control fish were placed in each
of four egg cups  (Petn dishes to which  a nine-cm high
collar of 450p. nylon mesh was attached) in the control
aquarium and in each aquarium receiving  Kepone.
Twenty  embryos from fish in each aquarium receiving
Kepone were placed in each of four egg cups in that
aquarium and into four egg cups  in the control aquar-
ium. Thus a total of 80 embryos w-as observed in each
of 15 separate treatments. Remaining eggs were frozen
for chemical analysis of Kepone  content. The dosing
apparatus cycled  about 350  times per day delivering
water to each aquarium containing egg cups. The action
of a self-starting siphon in each aquarium caused water
le\els to fluctuate approximately  5 cm  about 40  times
per day insuring  that water  in the egg cups was ex-
changed. Fry were  fed live brine shrimp  nauplii that
contained no detectable (<0.02 Mg/g)  Kepone, other
. ,:o--...t.. •^:.i.^:^ > : r'CB'-  At  ;hc  .iJ < :u,e
36-day emDryo-lr\-juveniie exposure,  juveniles  were
photographed for length measurements, weighed, and
some were frozen for chemical analyses.

               CHEMICAL ANALYSES
   Water samples  were analyzed by extracting one liter
of seawater twice with 100 ml  of methylene chloride.
The combined extracts were  concentrated to approxi-
mately 5 m) in a  Kuderna-Danish Concentrator on a
steam table, and  15 ml of benzene was added. The
extract was reconcentrated to  remove  the  methylene
chloride and was cleaned on a Flonsil Column (de-
scribed below).
   Tissues of fish  and fish eggs were weighed in 150
mm x  25 mm (O.D.) screw-top  test tubes and  were
extracted twice with 5-ml volumes of acetomtrile for 30
seconds  with a model PT  10-ST  Willems Polytron
(Bnnkman Instruments. Westbury, New York). The
test tube was centrifuged and the acetomtrile was trans-
ferred to a 250-ml separatory funnel. After the second
extraction, the tissue was  extracted with one 5-ml and
one 10-ml \olume ol acetone. After each acetone ex-
traction, the tube was centrifuged  and the acetone was
added to the  250-ml separatory tunnel. To the  com-
bined  extracts were added 100 m! of  2.0%  aqueous
sodium sulfate and  10 ml of 1:1  diethyl ether-petro-
leum ether The separatory tunnel was  shaken for one
 minute. After the solvent phases separated, the lower
 aqueous phase was  drained into a 250-ml beaker and
 the upper ether layer was collected m a 25-ml Kuderna-
 Danish concentrator tube. The ether extraction was
 repeated  three times with 5 ml of  1:1 diethyl  ether-
 petroleum ether. The combined extracts were concen-
 trated to just dryness by placing the concentrator tube
 in a water bath at 45°C and blowing off the solvent \Mth
 a  gentle stream of nitrogen. The  residue was  trans-
 ferred to a 200 mm  x 9 mm (l.D.) Chromaflex column
 (Kontes Glass Co.) containing 3.0 gm of Flonsil topped
 with 2.0 gm of anhydrous sodium sulfate, The column
 was  washed  initially with 10  ml  of hexane  and  the
 residue was transferred with tour 0.5 ml volumes of 5%
 diethyl ether  in hexane. PCB's and pesticides were
 eluted from the column with 20 ml of 5% diethyl ether
 in hexane. Then, Kepone was eluted in 40  mi of 1 %
 methanol in benzene. Individual extracts were concen-
 trated or diluted to appropriate volumes tor analyses by
 electron-capture gas chromatography.
   Determinations were  performed on Vanan Aero-
 graph  Model  2100  and 1400 Gas  Chromatographs
 equipped with  182  cm x 2 mm (l.D.) elass  columns
 packed with 2% SP2100 and 0.75% SP2250: 0.97%
 SP2401 on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport. The operating
 conditions were: oven temperature.  185°C;  injector
 temperature. 200°C: detector temperature, 210°C; ni-
 trogen carrier-gas flow rate. 25 ml/minute.
   The average recovery rate of Kepone from  fortified
 tissue was 87 % and from water. 85 %. Residue concen-
 trations were calculated on a wet-weight basis without a
 correction factor for percentage recovery. All  samples
 were fortified  with an internal standard (dichloroben-
 zophenone) prior to analysis to  evaluate the integrity  of
 the results.

               7-   PSTICAL ANALYSES
   Probit analyses of mortality data were used to deter-
 mine LC50's. Chi-square  tests (* =  0.05) were used  to
 determine statistical significance  of mortality  data.
 Analysis  of covariance and the N'ewman-Kuels (SNK1
 test was  used to test Uilierences in grow in ol ir\  in
 Kepone at a  - 0.01.

                     Results
                  ADULT EXPOSURE
   Kepone was toxic to and was accumulated by adult
sheepshead minnows exposed for four weeks (Table 1).
Mortality  increased  in relation  to the increase in con-
centration and duration of exposure (Figs. 1  & 2). All
fish exposed to 7.8 and 24 fie.  of Kepone/lner of salt-
water died by day  15 Twenty-two percent  of fish  in
0.8 Mg/'iter and 80% of  the  fish in 1.9 ^g/liter died;
most of the surviving fish exhibited symptoms of Ke-
pone poisoning.
   Symptoms  of  poisoning were related to concentra-
tion and duration of exposure,  but were not  typical  of
poisoning by other organochlorme pesticides (Hender-
son et  al. 1959). Symptoms of poisoning progressed
from scoliosis. darkening  of the posterior one-third  of
the body, hemorrhaging near  the  brain  and at the
anterior point ot darkening, to increased hemorrhaging
posteriorly, swelling of the darkened area, fin  rot. un-

-------
                                                                       Short Papers and Notes
                                                                                                   229
TABLE 1.  Toxiciu and  uptake  of Kepone  b\  adult sheepshead  minnows (Cyprmodon  variegatus) exposed
for 28 days  in an intermittent flow toxicny test. A total of 108 fish were exposed to 0.05 /us/liter Kepone and
32  males  and 32 females were exposed to other  concentrations. Samples  from 1.9 /ug/liter consisted of eight
females and  their eggs and five males; other samples consisted of a minimum of 16 females and  their eggs
and ten male fish.
    Exposure Concentration (^g/hler)
                                                             Concentration in Fish (/ug/g, Wet Weight)
Desired
Control
0.1
0.32
1.0
3.2
10.0
32.0
Measured
ND*
0.05
0.16
0 80
1.9
7.8
24.
Mortality %
5
5
0
22
80
100
100
Females
ND*
0.35
0 90
3.6
12.
_
-
Males
ND
0.25
0.65
2.5
11.
_
-
Eggs
ND
0.26
1.0
4.7
11.
_
-
    ND = Kepone not detected: <0 02  ^g/liter, <0.02 /ig/g.
                       12      16     20     24     28
                        TIME loo^i)
   FIG. 1. Mortality  of adult sheepshead minnows (Cv-
pnnodon vanegatus) exposed continuously to Kepone
for 28 days.
   20
    15
    10
                       I
                       P
                        I
                        i
                        \  EMBRYO, FRY AND
                             JUVENILE
          •
             ADULT
        3     \Z    16    20   24    28    32   36
                     EXPOSURE (doyt)
   Fig. 2.  Concentration of Kepone in water lethal to
50% (LC50) of embryo, try. and juvenile sheepshead
minnows continuously exposed for 36 days and adults
exposed for  28 days.
coordinated swimming, and cessation of feeding These
symptoms were observed on the first day in 24 /xg/liter,
the second in 7.8 /u.g/liter, the third in 1.9  p.g/liter, and
                                                     the eleventh day in 0.8 /xg Kepone/liter of water. These
                                                     symptoms increased in severity and frequency before
                                                     death from five to eight days later (Fig.  1).
                                                        Chemical analyses of adult sheepshead minnows ex-
                                                     posed to Kepone for four weeks showed that Kepone
                                                     was bioconcentrated in proportion to the  concentration
                                                     in the exposure water (Table 1). Concentration factors,
                                                     concentration in tissue divided by concentration in wa-
                                                     ter, averaged 5,200 (range  3.100 to  7,000). Concen-
                                                     trations of Kepone in females were greater than  in
                                                     males. Concentrations in eggs were generally similar to
                                                     amounts in females. The concentration  of Kepone in
                                                     dead fish was similar to that found in fish surviving the
                                                     exposure (Table 1). Dead fish in 7.8 /ug of Kepone/liter
                                                     of water contained 17 ^g/g,  in 1-9 jig/liter, 10 fig/g; in
                                                     0.8 Mg/Iiter- 3.4 /ig/g.
                                                            EMBRYO, FRY, AND JUVENILE EXPOSURE

                                                       Monalny. The effect of Kepone in water on mortal-
                                                     ity of embryos, fry, and juvenile sheepshead minnows,
                                                     tested by exposing progeny of adults from the control
                                                     aquarium to zero,"o.08rO.IS, 0  72, 2.0. 6.6, and 33 ptg
                                                     of Kepone/hter of water, was less than  that observed
                                                     with aduit tish exposed to similar concentrations (Table
                                                     2, Fig. 2). The 36-day LC50 to juveniles exposed to
                                                     Kepone in  water was 6.7  /ig/hter (95% confidence
                                                     interval: 4.7-13.4  ^ig/liter)  and the  28-day LC50 to
                                                     adults was 1.3 ne./\'ner (95% confidence interval: 1.1
                                                     to 1.5 ^tg/liter). Kepone in water affected mortality of
                                                     embryos prior to hatching.  Chi-square  tests revealed
                                                     that  mortality of embryos, in each  Kepone concentra-
                                                     tion did not differ from that of controls; however, com-
                                                     parisons between embryo mortality in control, 0.08.
                                                     and  0.18 ng/liter (average  9%) with concentrations
                                                     greater than 0.18 ng/liter (average  17%) indicate that
                                                     embryo  mortality  was  significantly  increased  by
                                                     Kepone. Fry from the embryos  exposed  to 6.6  and 33
                                                     /xg/liter were visibl\ affected within 24 hours of hatch-
                                                     ing.  Juvenile  fish  exposed  to  2.0 or  0.72  /xg/liter
                                                     beginning as embryos did not appear visibly affected
                                                     until  10  and 16 days after hatching,  respectively.
                                                    Symptoms of poisoning in fry less than one week old in-
                                                    cluded diminished activity .'loss of equilibrium, cessa-
                                                    tion of feeding, and emaciation  Symptoms in fry older
                                                    than  one week were identical to those observed in adult

-------
 230
               Short Papers and Notes
 TABLE 2.  Mortality of embryo, fry, and juvenile sheepshead minnows and bioconcentration of Kepone in 19
 to 63 juvenile fish (average 50)  in a 36-day exposure  In some instances parental fish were exposed to Kepone
 for 28 days thus their eggs contained Kepone
Exposure Concentration
Embrvo, Fry, & Juveniles
Control (ND)°
Control (ND)°
Control (ND)°
Control (ND)"
Control (ND)"
0.08
008
0.18
0.18
0.72
0.72
2.0
2.0
6.6
33.
(jig/liter, measured)
Parental Fish
Control (ND)
0.05
0.16
0.80
1.9
Control (ND)
0.05
Control (ND)
0.16
Control (ND)
0.80
Control (ND)
1.9
Control (ND)
Control (ND)

Embryos
6.2
8.8
5.0
11.5
25.0
11.1
8.8
8.8
6.2
21.5
13.9
15.8
26.2
17.5
13.8
Mortality (%)
Fry and Juve-
nile Fish
3.8
3.8
12.5
0
3.8
11.1
0
3.8
11.2
6.3
3.8
24.4
36.2
22.5
86.2

Total
10.0
12.6
17.5
11.5
28.8
22.2
8.8
12.5
17.5
27.8
17.7
40.2
62.5
40.0
100
— Concentration in Ju-
veniles (Mg/g. Wet
Weight)
ND"
ND
ND
ND
0.13
1.1
1.6
1.4
1.0
2.6
1.9
7.8
8.4
? *>
-
  " ND =  not detectable, <0.02 /ig/1. <0.02
 fish except for lack of hemorrhaging and the presence
 of edema in fry exposed to 0.72, 2.0 or 6.6 /ig/liter.
   Exposure of adult sheepshead minnows to Kepone
 affected mortality of their embryos in Kepone-free wa-
 ter (Table 2).  Sixteen percent of the embryos spawned
 by adult fish exposed to 1.9 /ng/liter failed to develop
 normally and  died,  embryos from adults exposed to
 lesser  concentrations developed normally  Fertiliza-
 tion, cleavage, gastrulation. and early differentiation of

 circulatory system,  appeared normal  for about 48
 hours. Thereafter, development ceased and although
 some embryos survived for nine days,  all  eventually
 died. Teratogenicity of Kepone might be related to us
 effect  on  the  gametes or to its presence within the
   In some instances, the presence oi Kepone in eggs
and water aitected tr. and juveniles to a greater extent
than in water or eggs alone, eftect on embryos was not
increased  (Table 21. Fourteen percent of the embryos
spawned by adults exposed to 1.9 /ig.-liter  developed
abnormally and died Mortality of embryos to hatching
averaged 7.1% in 0 18 /ig/liter or less ot Kepone and
20.1%  in concentrations greater than 0.18 pig/liter.
Fry from adults exposed to  1.9 ptg/hter showed symp-
toms ot poisoning one day after hatching in 2.0 /^g/liter
and as juveniles began to die  10  days later;  symptoms
were  more pronounced and deaths occurred ten  days
earlier than  those for juveniles of unexposed parents.
The combined effect ot Kepone in eggs and  water was
negligible  at lower concentrations
   Although juveniles that survived 36 days of expo-
sure  to 0.08 /ug/hter of Kepone showed  no  symptoms
of Kepone poisoning, three oi five  juvenile  fish re-
covered  at termination of the test had  scohosis and
blackened tails. These five fish, spawned naturally by
adult  fish  previously exposed to  0.05 /ig/liter. were
exposed to Kepone longer than were juv eniles from the
36-day duration embryo, frv. and  juvenile exposure. In
Kepone-iree water scoliosis persisted for more than 10
 days. We believe, therefore, that long-term effects of
 Kepone on juvenile fish were underestimated in the 36-
 day test.
   Growth.  Kepone  affected  growth  of sheepshead
 minnows (Fig. 3). The average standard length of juve-
 niles exposed to 0.08 to 6.6 jigof Kepone/hter of water
 was  less  than  that  of   unexposed  juveniles  (P
 <0.000000). Juvenile length decreased in direct  pro-
 portion to increased concentration of Kepone and was
 generally Limnilj.T.ced by a hSMry of previous expo-
 sure of their parents.  Lengths of juveniles in  Kepone-
 free water  did  not differ even when parents  were ex-
 posed to Kepor.e concentrations ot 0.05 to 0.8 fig/liter.
 However, juveniles from parents  exposed to  1.9  /ig/1
 were shorter than unexposed juveniles  (p <0.01).
   Bioconccntranon,   Chemical  analyses of  juvenile
 sheepshead  minnows  exposed  to  Kcro'-.o ••!  <.,>.:!.- ••<;
 embrvos and fr\ for 3f>  days showe^. :.;„; .Cv\ -c •, as
 bioconccntrated and  that prior exposure of  parental
 fish had little effect on quantities concentrated (Table
 2). Concentrations  of Kepone  in juvenile^ increased
 with  increased concentrations  of  Kepone  in water.
 Concentration factors increased from 3.600 to 20.000
 (average 7,200) as exposure concentration decreased
 (Fig. 4). This relationship was not observed with adult
 sheepshead  minnows  exposed  to Kepone.  Juvenile
 progeny of adult  fish  exposed to  1.9 ^.g of Kepone/
 liter —though hatched and grown  in Kepone-tree  wa-
 ter—contained 0.13 fjig Kepone/g or about 46% of the
 0.011 micrograms of  Kepone originally in an ege  re-
mained in the juveniles even after 36 days in Kepone-
free saltwater.

                    Discussion
   The hazard of  Kepone to fish is greatly  underesti-
mated by acute toxicity tests and is incompletely  re-
vealed by the results of our tests. Although the 96-hour
LC50 of Kepone to sheepshead minnows is 70 p.g/hter
(Schimmel and  Wilson 1977). adult fish in this study

-------
                                                                       Short Papers and Notes
                                                                                                  231

   14
 1.2
 §10
      OO5'
      016
      CONTROL
     '08

      19
 z
 1-
 l/>

 ^  O "
• PARENTS UNEXPOSED
• PARENTS EXPOSED
                                                      20
    0             01            10           10.0
    JUVENILE EXPOSURE  CONCENTRATION (jjg/l)
   Fig. 3.  Average standard length of juvenile sheeps-
head minnows exposed as embryos and fry for 36 days
to zero, 0.08, 0.18, 0.72, 2.0. or 6.6 /ig of  Kepone/
liter of water. Concentrations to which parent fish were
exposed were: zero, 0.05.  0.16, 0.80, or 1.9  /iig/hter.
* Concentration of Kepone in water, /^g/liter, for par-
ent fish exposed prior to placement of their embryos in
Kepone-free water.
 died when exposed to concentrations as low as 0.8 /ug/
 liter for 2S days  In exposures that began with embryos.
 juvenile fish exposed to 0.08 /ig/hter were smaller than
 unexposed control fish Other effects, such as scoliosis.
 were also observed in these tish. Growth, reproduc-
 tion, or survival was affected  by all concentrations
 tested. It  is  generally accepted that  0.01  oi the acute
 toxicity of a  persistent organic chemical to an organism
 should be protective of a species (NAS-NAE.1973).
 O'.T c:.;a. however, indicaic that a Kepone cen.vntra-
 tion of 0.001 of the 96-hour LC50 for sheepsh-.- l min-
 nows aliected this species uc;r.nicniaii\ in cnromc to.v
 icit\ test.
   Reproduction of adult sheepshead minnows was af-
 fected by exposure to Kepone in water, but the effect
 appears to be less pronounced than in birds and mam-
 mals  fed this  insecticide. Some  sheepshead minnow
 embryos from exposed parents developed abnormally.
 although the majority developed, hatched, and sur-
 vived as successfully as embryos  from unexposed par-
 ents.  Effects on quail, pheasants,  and pigeons have
 ranged from complete inhibition of reproduction to
 effects which include cellular, physiological, and endo-
 cnnological  alterations (De Witt et al.  1961; Elder
 1964. McFarland and Lacy  1969; and Eroschenko and
 Wilson 1 975) Kepone in food fed to cows was bioaccu-
 mulated with no apparent ill effect (Smith and Arant
 1967). whereas reproduction in mice was  reduced as
 ingested concentrations increased (Good et al.  1965).
 Our use of a hormone to enhance egg production and
artificial spawning procedures may have masked possi-
ble  additional  reproductive effects  of  Kepone  on
sheepshead minnows.
                                                       15
                            cc
                            o
                                                      1 10
                                                        005
                                                                 01      05        10     50
                                                             KEPONE CONCENTRATION IN WATER (ug/l)
                                                                                                   100
                              Fig. 4.  Concentration factor of Kepone in juvenile
                            sheepshead minnows after 36 days exposure that began
                            with embryos as a function of concentration of expo-
                            sure. (Concentration factor = concentration measured
                            in juvenile fish divided by concentration measured in
                            water). Dashed lines indicate 95% confidence limits.


                              Kepone is a highly bioconcentrated pesticide. Bio-
                           concentration factors from 3.600 to 20.000 observed in
                           juvenile sheepshead minnows exposed to Kepone were
                           similar to those observed in juveniles similar!) exposed
                           to the  •T>ecticide<; ep'Jr'i. 3.300-4.800  (Schimmel et
                           al.  i .-75): chloraane,  6.51/0-12.300  (Parrish et al.
                           1976);  toxaphene.  6,100-14.400 and  heptachlor.
                           2,400-4.600 (Goodman et  al.  In  press)  and  to  the
                           polychlorinated biphenyls. Aroclor  1016. 2.500-8.000
                           (Hansen et al.  1975)'  and Aroclor  1254, 16.000-
                           32,000 (Schimmel et al  1974). However, the concen-
                           tration factor tor Kepone in juveniles increased with
                           decreased Concentration:, in  water. \W  would  expect
                           that concentration factors would have been unaffected
                           by changing concentrations of exposure as obser\ed
                           with juvenile sheepshead minnows exposed to the four
                           insecticides and both PCB's. Concentration factors in
                           adult sheepshead minnows exposed  to Kepone. 3,100-
                           7,000: Aroclor  1016,  4.700-14.000 (Hansen et al.
                           1975). and Aroclor 1254. 15,000-30.000  (Hansen et
                           al. 1974) also were unaffected by change in concentra-
                           tion of exposure.
                             In these laboratory tests, Kepone was toxic to and
                           accumulated by adult  sheepshead minnows and their
                           progeny. This  data may be helpful in evaluating  the
                           impact of Kepone in estuaries.

                                           ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

                             The significant contributions of Jerrold Forester and
                           Johnnie Knight in chemical analyses of water and fish
                           samples and Walter Burgess. Jr. and Charles S. Man-
                           ning  for technical support during the  bioassay are
                           gratefully acknowledged.

-------
232
              Short Papers anc! Notes
                LITERATURE CITED
BUTLER.  P.  A. 1963. Pesticide-Wildlife Studies-A
  review of  Fish and  Wildlife Service investigations
  dunnc 1961  and  1962. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ore.
  167:f 1-25.
DEWITT,  J.  B.,  D.  G  CRABTREE.  R.  B. FINLEY,
  AND J. L. GEORGE.  1961. Effects on wildlife. In:
  Effects of pesticides on  fish and wildlife in  1960.
  U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Ore.  143:4-15.
ELDER, W. H.  1964 Chemical inhibitors of ovulation
  in the pigeon. J.  Wildl. Mgt. 28(3):556-575.
EROSCHENKO, V. P.. and W. O. WILSON. 1975.  Cellu-
  lar changes in the gonads. livers and adrenal  glands
  of Japanese  quail as affected by the insecticide Ke-
  pone. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 31: 491-504.
GOOD, E. E., G. W. WARE. AND D. F. MILLER. 1965.
  Effects of insecticides on  reproduction in the labora-
  tory-  mouse:  1. Kepone.  J.  Econ.   Eniomol.
  58(4):754-757.
GOODMAN, L. R., D. J. HANSEN, J  A. COUCH,  AND J.
  FORESTER.  1976  Effects of heptachlor and  toxa-
  phene on laboratory-reared  embryos and  fry  of the
  sheepshead minnow. Proc. 30th Annu. Conf. South-
  east. Assoc.  Game and Fish Comm., in press.
HANSEN, D, J., A. J. WILSON, D. R. NIMMO, S. C.
  SCHIMMEL. L. H. BAHNER, AND R. HUGGETT.  1976.
  Kepone:  Hazard to aquatic organisms. Science
  193:528.
	, S.  C. SCHIMMEL,  AND  J.  FORESTER  1975.
  Effects of Arodor® 1016 on embryos, fry, juveniles,
  and adults of sheepshead  minnows (Cyprinodon var-
  iegatus). Trans. Am. Fish. Soc 104(3):584-588.
     -, S.  C. SCHIMMEL,  AND J FORESTER.  1974.
  WELL.  1959. Relative  toxicn> of ten chlorinated
  hydrocarbon  insecticides  to four  species of fish.
  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 88(l):23-32.
McFARLAND, L  Z.. AND P. P.  LACY.  1969  Physio-
  logic and endocnnologic  effects of the insecticide
  Kepone in the Japanese quad. Toxicol. Appl. Phar-
  macol. 15:441-450.
NAS-NAE Committee on  Water  Quality  Criteria.
  1973. Water Quality Criteria. 1972. Ecof Res Ser.
  xx  +594  pp.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
  Agency,  EPA-R3-73-033-March 1973. U.S. Go\.
  Print. Office, Wash.. D.C. 20402.
PARRISH. P. R., S. C. SCHIMMEL. D. J. HANSEN. i.  M.
  PATRICK,  JR., AND  J. FORESTER. 1976. Chlordane:
  Effects on several estuanne organisms. J. Toxicol.
  Environ.  Health 1:485-494.
SCHIMMEL. S. C., AND A. J.  WILSON, JR. 1977. Acute
  toxicity of Kepone® to four estuarine animals Chesa-
  peake Sci. 18(2)-.224-227.
	,  D. J.  HANSEN, AND J. FORESTER. 1974. Ef-
  fects of Aroclor®  1254 on laboratory-reared em-
  bryos and frj of sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon
  variegaius). Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 103(3):582-5S6.
     -, P. R. PARRISH, D. J. HANSEN, J.  M.  PATRICK.
  Aroclor® 1254 in eggs of sheepshead minnows: Ef-
  fec'. '•>" fertilization success and survival of embryos
  :na :r.. Proc. 2"th Annu.  Conf  Southeast. Assoc.

 I;- jn;j^.s. C., Q. H. PICKERING, AND C. M. TARZ-
  JR.,  AND J. FORESTER. 1975. Endrm: Effects  on
  several estuarine organisms. Proc. 28th Annu. Conf.
  Southeast. Assoc. Game and Fish Comm.,  1974.
  p. 187-194.
SMITH, J. C., AND  F.  S. ARANT  1967. Residues of
  Kepone® in milk from cows receiving treated feed.
  J. Econ. Eniomol. 60(4):925-927.
             DAVID J  HANSEN. LARRY R. GOODMAN
             AND ALFRED j. WILSON,  JR.
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agencv
             Environmental Research  Laboratorv
             Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561

-------
                 EFFECTS OF KEPONE^ ON ESTUARINE ORGANISMS1

                  D.  J.  Hansen, D.  R. Nimmo,  S.  C. Schimmel,
                      G. E. Walsh,  and A.  J.  Wilson,  Jr.
                     U.  S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                       Environmental  Research Laboratory
                          Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
                                   ABSTRACT

                Laboratory toxicity tests  were conducted to deter-
           mine the effects and accumulations  of Kepone in estuarine
           algae, mollusks, crustaceans,  and fishes.   Nominal  Kepone
           concentrations  calculated to  decrease algal  growth  by 50%
           in static bioassays  lasting seven days were:  350 vg/a,
           Chlorococcum sp.;  580 pg/£, Dunaliella tertiolecta',  600
           yg/£, Nitsschia sp.; and 600  pg/£,  Thalassiosira
           pseudonana.   Measured Kepone  concentrations  calculated
           to cause 50% mortality in flowing-seawater toxicity
           tests lasting 96 hours were:   10 pg/£ for  the mysid
           shrimp (Mysicbpsis bahia);  120  ug/£ for the  grass shrimp
           (Palaemonetes pugio}',  >210  yg/£ for the blue crab
           (Callinectes sa.pid.us}; 70 yg/£  for  the sheepshead minnow
           (Cyprinoobn  variegatus)',  and  6.6 yg/£ for  the spot
           (Leiostomus  xanthurus).   Bioconcentration  factors (con-
           centration in whole  animals divided by concentration
           measured in  water) in  these tests were greatest for
           fishes (950  to  1,900)  and less  for  grass shrimp (420 to
           930).

                Survival,  growth, and  reproduction of mysids 2rd
           sheepshead minnows were  decreased in chronic bioassays
           lasting 14 to 64 days.   Growth  of mysids and sheepshead
           minnows  was  reduced  by exposure to  0.07 ug/ji and 0.08
           ug/£ respectively.   Bioconcentration factors for sheeps-
           head minnows  in  the  chronic bioassay averaged 5,200
 K)
^Registered  trademark, Allied Chemical Corp., 40 Rector St., New York,
   10006.   Kepone was purchased from Chem Service, West Chester, PA, as
   99%  pure.   Our analyses  indicated 88% purity.


   Contribution No.  311, Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze.

                                     20

-------
           (range,  3,100-7,000) for adults exposed for 28 days and
           7,200  (3,600-20,000) for juveniles exposed for 36 days.
           The  chronic  toxicity and bioconcentration potential of
           Kepone are more  important factors than its acute
           toxicity in  laboratory evaluations of environmental
           hazard.  Therefore, these factors should be considered
           when attempting  to assess present impacts and to limit
           future impacts of this insecticide on the aquatic
           environment.
                                INTRODUCTION

     Kepone  (decachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-2H-cylobuta [cd] pentalene
2-one) is an insecticide that was manufactured and formulated in the United
States to control ants, cockroaches, and insect pests of potatoes and
bananas.  Kepone is toxic to birds and mammals, including man (Jaeger 1976),
and acutely  toxic to some estuarine organisms (Butler 1963).   Recent contam-
ination of water, sediment, and biota in freshwater and estuarine portions of
the James River, Virginia, has stimulated concern about this  chemical's
hazard to aquatic biota (Hansen et al. 1976).  This concern was based on (1)
the continued occurrence of Kepone in many finfishes and shellfishes in
amounts that forced closure of fishing because of potential human health
hazard, and  (2) laboratory studies which showed that Kepone is highly bio-
accurnulati ve and toxic to estuarine organisms, particularly in chronic
exposures.  This paper describes the results of these laboratory toxicity
tests with estuarine algae, oysters, crustaceans, and fishes  and chronic
tests with a crustacean and a fish.

                           EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Acute Toxicity

     Algae:   The unicellular algae Chloroaocoum sp., Dunaliella tertioleeta,
nitzszkia. sp., and Tnalassiosira pseudonzr.a were exposed to Kepone for seven
days to determine its effect on growth (Walsh et al. 1977).  Algae were
cultured in 25 or 50 ml of growth media and artificial  seawater of 30 °/oo
salinity and a temperature of 20 C (Hollister et al. 1975).  Kepone, in 0.1
ml acetone,  was added to culture media, and 0.1  ml of acetone was added to
control cultures.   Photoperiod consisted of 12 hours dark and 12 hours of
5000 lux illumination.   Effect on growth was determined by electrophoto-
metrically measuring optical  density.   Also, algae grown for  6 days in media
and then exposed to 100 yg/.n Kepone for 24 hours were analyzed for Kepone
content.

     Oysters:  The acute toxicity of Kepone to embryos  of the eastern oyster
(Crzssostrsa virginica) was determined by measuring its effect on development
                                    21

-------
of fully-shelled, straight-hinged veligers in a 48-hour static exposure .
Methods used were those of Woelke (1972) and U. S. EPA (1975).  Test contain-
ers were l-£ glass jars that contained 900 mi of 20 C, 20 °/oo salinity sea-
water and 25,000 ± 1,000 oyster embryos.  All test concentrations were
triplicated.  The number of normal and abnormal embryos were counted micro-
scopically in a Sedgewick-Rafter cell at the end of 48 hours of exposure to
Kepone.

     Crustaceans and Fishes:  The acute toxicity of Kepone to grass shrimp
(Palaemonetes puaio], blue crabs (Callinsctss sapidus], sheepshea'd minnows
(Cyyrinodon variegatus), and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus]  was determined in
96-hour flow-through toxicity tests  (Schimmel and Wilson 1977).  Acclimation
and testing procedures were compatible with those of Standard Methods (APHA
1971).  Test animals were caught locally and 20 were placed in each 18£
aquarium.  Water flow to each aquarium was 68 £/hour.  Stock solutions of
Kepone in acetone were metered into  experimental aquaria at the rate of 60
me/hour.  Control aquaria received 60 m£ of acetone/hour.  At the end of the
experiment, surviving animals were chemically analyzed for Kepone content.

     The acute toxicity of Kepone to mysids. (Mysidopsis bahia} was determined
by using intermittent flows of water from a diluter (Mount and Brungs 1967)
or continuous flow of w'ater from a siphon and Kepone from an infusion pump
(Bahner et al. 1975).   Thirty-two 48-hour-old juvenile mysids were placed in
chambers (4 mysids per chamber) in each test aquarium.  Chambers consisted of
glass petri dishes to which a 15 cm  tall cylinder of 210p mesh nylon screen
was glued.  Water in the chambers was renewed by a self-starting siphon which
nearly emptied and then filled each  aquarium at about 25 min intervals.

Chronic Toxicity

     Mysidopsis bahia:  The chronic  toxicity of Kepone to this mysid was
determined 'in 19-day exposures that  began with 48-hour-old juveniles.  (Nimmo
et al., in press).  The time permitted production of several broods for
assessment of reproductive success and survival of progeny.  Exposure condi-
tions, apparatus, and number of mysids per concentration were identical  to
those of the acute toxicity tests.  Three tests were conducted:  One to
  ---- -"'	' •" -      _-      '  -. -. ; tv/c =t "-y.-.Qr i^r.centrations
to cetern-.Tne effects on growth.  Data from the two growth experiments were
pooled for statistical analysis.

     Cyorinodon variegatus:  The chronic toxicity of Kepone to sheepshead
minnows was determined in a 64-day flow-through bioassay—exposure of adults
for 28 days followed by a 36-day exposure of their progeny (Hansen et al.
1977).  We delivered Kepone, 0.0088  y£ of the solvent triethylene glycol,
and 1.5£ of filtered 30 C seawater (average salinity, 15 °/oo; range, 8-26
°/oo) to each 70£ aquarium during each of 440 daily cycles of the dosing
apparatus of Schimmel  et al.  (1974).  Seawater and solvent were delivered to
the control aquarium.   Thirty-two adult females and 32 adult males were
  This research was performed under an EPA contract by Tom Heitmuller,
  Bionomics-EG&G,  'nc. Marine Research Laboratory, Pensacola, Florida 32507.

                                     22

-------
 exposed  to  each  concentration of Kepone for 28 days.  Egg production was
 enhanced using injections of 50 I.U. of humar chorionic gonadotrophic hormone
 on  exposure day  25  and  27 (Schimmel et al. 1974).  Eggs were fertilized on
 day 28 and  placed in  chambers (glass petri dishes with 9-cm tall cylinders of
 450y nylon  mesh).   Twenty embryos were used in each chamber.  Embryos from
 control  fish were placed in four chambers in the control aquaria and in four
 chambers  in each of the six aquaria receiving Kepone.  Embryos from fish in
 each of  the six  aquaria receiving Kepone were placed in four chambers in that
 aquarium and in  four  chambers in the control aquarium.  Water in the chambers
 was  exchanged by the  action of a self-starting siphon in each aquarium that
 caused water levels to  fluctuate 5 cm about 40 times per day.  In the 36-day
 exposure to determine Kepone's effect on survival and growth of progeny,
 embryos  hatched  and fry grew until they were juvenile fish.   Kepone content
 of  adult fish, their  eggs, and juvenile fish was determined.

                            STATISTICAL ANALYSES

      Probit analyses of growth and mortality data were used to determine
 EC50's and  LC50's.  Growth data for /./.  bahia were subjected to analysis of
 variance  (a = 0.05) and for C.  variegatus, analysis of covariance and Newman-
 Kuels tests  (a = 0.01) was used.

                              CHEMICAL ANALYSES

     Water  from acute and chronic tests with crustaceans and fishes, and
 organisms surviving these tests, were analyzed by gas chromatography.
 Methods of  extraction concentration, cleanup,  and quantification were des-
 cribed by Schimmel  and Wilson (1977).

                           RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 Acute Toxicity

     Algae:  Growth of marine unicellular algae was reduced  by exposure to
 Kepone in static tests (Table 1).   CrdoTococcus was the most sensitive of
 the  four algae tested with a 7-day EC5Q cf 350 'jg/t.   The tnree  less sensi-
 tive species responded similarly to Kepone with overlapping  confidence limits
 for  EC50's.  Algae exposed to 100  yg Kepone/c  of media accumulated the
 chemical  with Chlorococs-iMv containing  0.80 yg/g;  D.  tertiolecta,  0.23 yg/g;
Uizzscnia,  0.41  yg/g;  and T.  pseudonanz,  0.52  yg/g.   Butler  (1963)  reported
 that when estuarine phytoplankton  were exposed to 1,000 yg/£ carbon fixation
was  reduced by 95;i.

     Oysters:  The  48-hr EC50 for  oyster  larvae in  static tests  was  less  than
 those of algae (TableJ).   The  EC50,  calculated using nominal  water concen-
 trations, was 66  yg/?/.   Embryos  from  56  uq/i  were  fully shelled  and straight-
 hinged but appeared  smaller  than  those  from controls.   The  percentage of nor-
rr.al  embryos in 65 ugA was  32 percent  and  in 87 MgA  it was  0:;.   The concen-
 tration of Kepone calculated to  reduce  shell  deposition of  juvenile eastern
oysters  by 50;^  in a  96-hour  flowing water bioassay  was  38 ygA  in water of
 14 C and  11  ygA  in  water of 31  C  (Butler 1963)!
                                     23

-------
•TABLE  1.  ACUTE TOXICITY  OF  KEPONE TO ESTUARINE ORGANISMS.  ALGAL AND MOLLUSK
          TOXICITY TESTS  WERE STATIC AND ESTIMATED NOMINAL CONCENTRATIONS
          REDUCING GROWTH OF ALGAE AND EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT OF OYSTERS BY
          50%  (EC50).  TOXICITY TESTS WITH CRUSTACEANS AND FISHES WERE FLOW-
          THROUGHS THAT ESTIMATED THE MEASURED CONCENTRATION IN WATER LETHAL
          TO 50%  (LC50).  NINETY-FIVE % CONFIDENCE LIMITS ARE IN PARENTHESES.

Organisms


Temperature,
C

Salinity,
%o
Exposure
Duration,
Days

EC50/LC50
ugA
Algae
 Chloroccecum sp.              20
 Dunaliella tertioleeta        20
 Nitzsch-ia sp.                 20
 Thalassiosira pseudonana      20
Mollusk
 Crassostrea virginiaa         20
Crustaceans
 Callinectss sapidus           19
 Mysidopsis bahia              26
 Palaemonetes pugio            20
Fishes
 Cyprinodon variegatus         18
 L±i :-3tomus xanthurus          25
30
30
30
30

21

20
13
16

15
18
7
7
7
7
4
4
4

4
4
 350
 580
 600
 600
(270-400)
(510-640)
(530-660)
(500-700)
         66   (60-74)
>210
  10
 120
(8.1-12)
(100-170)
  70   (56-99)
   6.6 (5.3-8.S)
     Crustaceans and Fishes:  Kepone, at the concentrations tested, was
acutely toxic to mysids (Nimmo et al. 1977), grass shrimp, sheepshead min-
nows, and spot, but not to blue crabs (Schim.r.el and Wilson 1977) (Table 1).
Spot and mysids were the more sensitive species with 96-hour LC50 values of
6.6 and 10 pg/£.  Crabs exposed to as much as 210 yg Kepone/x, suffered no
significant mortality.  Symptoms of acute Kepone poisoning in fishes included
lethargy, loss of equilibrium, and darkened coloration on the posterior
portion of the body, occasionally only in one quadrant.  Crustaceans became
lethargic before death but exhibited no color change.  Butler (1963) reported
48-hour LC50 or EC50 values (based on nominal concentrations) for other
estuarine organisms were:   brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus), 85 yg/£; and white
mullet (Mugil curema], 55 ug/£.
     Kepone was bioconcentrated from water by all four species we exposed for
96 hours.  Bioconcentration factors (concentration in tissue divided by
                                     24

-------
 measured Kepone in water) for fishes were similar (950 to 1,900).  Bioconcen-
 tration factors for grass shrimp ranged from 420 to 930 and for blue crabs,
 6 to 10.

                               CHRONIC TOXICITY

      Mysidopsis bahia:  Exposure of this mysid to Kepone for 19 days in the
 first experiment decreased its survival and reduced the number of. young pro-
 duced per female (Table 2) (Nimmo et al. 1977).  At the highest concentration
 (8.7 pg/£) all mysids were dead within the first two days.   At lesser concen-
 trations (1.6 and 4.4 pg/x)  mortality continued throughout the test.  Eighty-
 four % of the mysids survived exposure to 0.39 pg Kepone/£ water and 91%
 survived in control aquaria.   In addition, natural  reproduction was affected.
 Average number of young mysids produced per female was 15 in control, 9 in
 0.39 pg/£, and 0 in 1.6 ug/£.  Mysids that survived throughout the Kepone
 exposure appeared smaller than those in control aquaria,  therefore, two
 additional experiments were  conducted to measure Kepone's effect on growth.

 TABLE 2.  EFFECT OF KEPONE ON THE SURVIVAL OF MYSIDOPSIS BAHIA AND ON AVERAGE
           NUMBER OF YOUNG PER FEMALE IN A 19-DAY FLOW-THROUGH TOXICITY TEST.


   Average Measured               Percentage                   Number of Young
 Kepone Concentration              Survival                      per Female
Control
0.39
1.6
4.4
8.7
91
84
50
3
0
15.3
8.9*
0

—
 *Statistically significant at a =  0.05 using 2 sample t-test.


      In these experiments, the average length (tip of carapace to end of
 uropod) of mysids  exposed  to  Kepone was decreased  (Nimmo et al.  1977).
 Females exposed to 0.072,  0.11, 0.23,  or 0.41  pg/£ were significantly shorter
 than  were  control  mysids;  average  length was 8.2 mm for exposed  versus  8.6 mm
 for control  female mysids.  Unexposed  and exposed  males, however, were;of
 similar average lengths,  7.7  to 8.0 mm.

      C-jprinodon variegatus:   Kepone was toxic to adult sheepshead minnows
 exposed for  28 days  (Table 3).   Symptoms of poisoning included:   scoliosis,
 darkening  of  the body  posterior to  the dorsal  fin,  hemorrhaginq  near the
 brain,  edema,  fin-rot,  uncoordinated swimming,  and cessation of  feeding.
'Symptoms were  first  observed  on day 1  in 24 yg/£,  2 in 7.8 ug/£,  3 in 1.9
 pg/Z, and  day  11 in  0.8 pg/£.   Mortalities  began 5 to 8 days- after onset of
 symptoms.
                                     25

-------
 TABLE  3.   EFFECT  OF  KEPONE  ON AND ACCUMULATION OF KEPONE BY ADULT SHEEPSHEAD
           MINNOWS  EXPOSED FOR 28 DAYS.
Average Measured
Exposure Concentration, yg/£
ND*
0.05
0.16
0.80
1.9
7.8
24.
Percentage
Mortality
5
5
0
22
80
100
100
Whole Body
Concentration, pg/g
ND
0.30
0.78
3.0
12.


*ND = Kepone not detected in control water (<0.02 yg/£) nor in control fish
 (<0.02 yg/g).


     Kepone affected the progeny of 28 day exposed adults.  In Kepone-free
water, mortality of embryos from adults exposed to 0.05-0.8 vg/a was similar
to that of embryos from unexposed adults (range, 6-12 percent).  However, in
Kepone-free seawater, 25% of the embryos from fish exposed to 1.9 yg of
Kepone/£ died; abnormal development of 13 of these 20 embryos preceded
mortality.
     Kepone in water affected progeny of exposed parents to a greater extent
than progeny of unexposed parents (Table 4).   Some embryos exposed to 2.0
ug/z developed abnormally and fry had more pronounced symptoms ard *>?"
began to die 10 days earlier wrier, parental fish had been exposec co i.^ -ng/\
than was observed in progeny from unexposed parents.
or
     Kepone also affected growth of sheepshead minnows in the 36-day exposure
    ;rcteny ;rvrjre 1).  The average standard lenrth of iuveri'1 es excosed to
all Kepone concentrations was less than that of unexposed control  juveniles.
Lengths decreased in direct proportion to increasing Kepone concentrations in
water and were generally not influenced by parental exposure.   A similar
decrease was also noted in weights, but because juveniles exposed  to 0.72,
2.0, or 6.6 yg/£ were edematous, they weighed more than unexposed  juveniles
of similar lengths.

     Kepone was bioconcentrated by sheepshead minnow adults and their progeny
exposed to the insecticide in water.   Kepone was bioconcentrated in adult
fish in direct proportion to concentration in exposure water (Table 3).   Con-
centration factors averaged 5,200 (range, 3,100-7,000).  Kepone concentra-
tions in females and their eggs were  similar and were 1.3 times greater  chan
amounts in males.  Concentrations of  Kepone in juvenile fish,  at the end of
the 36-day progeny exposure, increased with increased concentration of Kepone
in water (Table 4).   Prior exposure of parental  fish apparently did not
                                    26

-------
 affect  final  Kepone  concentration  in  progeny.   Concentration factors for
 juvenile  fish  averaged  7,200  (range,  3,600-20,000)  and  increased with decrease
 in  concentration  of  exposure.

 TABLE 4.   MORTALITY  IN  PROGENY  OF  ADULT  SHEEPSHEAD  MINNOWS  THAT  WERE EXPOSED
           TO  KEPONE  AND IN  PROGENY OF UNEXPOSED,  CONTROL  FISH.   NOMINAL
           EXPOSURE FOR  THE  28-DAY  EXPOSURE  OF  ADULT FISH  AND THE 36-DAY
           EXPOSURE OF PROGENY WERE THE SAME.   PROGENY EXPOSURE  BEGAN WITH
           EMBRYOS AND ENDED WITH JUVENILE  FISH FROM THE EMBRYOS.   RESIDUES
           ARE  CONCENTRATIONS OF KEPONE (ug/g)  IN  WHOLE  JUVENILES,  WET WEIGHT.
Measured  Exposure
   Concentration
1
                    Parental  Fish History

Progeny of Unexposed Parents    Progeny of Exposed Parents
»g/.
Control (ND)
0.08
0.18
0.72
2.0
6.6
-33.
Mortal ity
10
22
12
28
40
40
100
Residue
yg/g
ND1
1.1
1.4
2.6
7.8
22.
--
Mortality
10
9
18
18
62
—
--
Residue
ND1
1.6
1.0
1.9
8.4
--
--
 ND = not detectable, <0.02 ug/>>, <0.02 yg/g.
     In our tests, Kepone was acutely toxic to, and accumulated by, estuarine
algae, mollusks, crustaceans, and fishes.  Chronic toxicity tests with ;•/.
"o-if-.ia. and C, va.rieg3.-cus revealed that Kepone affected survival, growth,  and
reproduction.  Effects on growth were observed at 0.001 of the 96-hour LC50.
.-"(-• .rnulation of Kepone was also greatest in chronic tests.  Therefore,
•-•,•, iic tests should be used to assess Kepone's environmental hazard and  to
•'<•  o decisions necessary to minimize its future impact on the aquatic envi-
•• ••  int.
                                     27

-------
*
T3 O
— ' O
cu 3
O 0
fD ro
3 rs
fD rt
rs -s
rt Cu
rt
O ->•
— h O

rr o
fD — h
— i.
~5 xx
ro
ro ~o
3 o
cr 3
-s ro

o -'•
-•• S
rs cu
rt
7^ ro
ro -5
-a •
o
rs -c
ro 

CO ' ^ w -t> ^ -s - ro ro -h o s: -s CU rt "O ro cu -s -s • ro •""S rt -t, 1/1 =*" fD X -a o C/1 fD a. -a o -s o CO c -s fD _, . o t3 o ro 3> O cu . X < rs -s o~a ro o ro oo o -s ro rs - oo cu n <-+ ro oo <-+ oo.ro ~S -h • CU -"• 1 CU 00 rt oo oo oo <-t- -•• rr-. cu o ro zs 3 -•• o 3 Q- oo 3 . cr cu ^•J -5 -s O OO IX)^ CX -h O » O 3 oo — ' 7^ ro r\3 « ro ro • rs ~n ->• o -hta 03- T rt 3 3 CD ro • ex c-j. »* OO CT) C C-J. < o cu -c c ro • — '<£) < 3 o oo ro -•• en O O 3 — • - ^ -h -•• ro CD ro 7^ ro oo • -5 ro oo 3- — ' ro ~o ro en o -h ro - ro 3 o "a x ro -s oo o ^> to ro oo oo cr> cu o ro o cx - ex -+, a_ cu 3 o rt s: << -•• -S O Cu oo 3 rt 3 — • 00 ro rt O -•• -s o S UD 3 • oo -•• O (O CU -^. -s ( c. O <^ m ^^ —--— | m m x "D C3 / /\ N^ « * — d **(J m 0 _ .«£.. o Ln ^^. H — 33 ^ *|--^ i O t^ __ x^—rf* _r O AVERAGE STANDARD LENGTH (mm) r> oo o F3 A | | m m 9 gri m r~ O MC> O O bo jjjf o : — o Jr z0' tn j^y ~H # ^w' 30 Km f^ Em ^"^ >0r *~ MM fW MM ft 00 • • ~* • • ' V D **• >lr /r ;/ 4J j<7 - • 4r f S / "0 ~n _>r^ ^ >ii ^w JT / ^ J> /m m ,^<^ _x^ H H CO CO ^~« m e ^X^ x ^ ^^ ~*> C x^ o x ^- w S • g s • 0 m o b


-------
                                 REFERENCES

American Public Health Association et al.  1976.  Standard methods  for  the
     examination of water and wastewater.  14th ed.  Am.  Public Health  Assoc.,
     Washington, D. C.  1193 p.

Bahner, L. H., C. D. Craft, and D. R. Nimmo.  1975.  A  saltwater  flow-through
     bioassay method with controlled temperature and salinity.  Prog. Fish-
     Cult.  37(3): 126-129.

Butler, P. A.  1963.  Commercial fisheries investigations.  Pp. 11-25 in  J.
     L. George (ed.), Pesticide-wildlife studies:  a review of Fish  and
     Wildlife Service investigations during 1961 and 1962.  Fish  and Wild],
     Serv. Circ. 167.  U. S. Dept. Int., Washington, D. C.  109 p.

Hansen, D. J., L. R. Goodman, and A. J. Wilson, Jr.  1977.  Kepone^-':
     Chronic effects on embryo, fry, juvenile, and adult  sheepshead  minnows,
     (Cyprinodon variegatus), Chesapeake Sci.  (In press),

Hansen, D. J., A. J. Wilson, D. R. Nimmo, S. C. Schimmel, L.  H. Bahner, and
     R. Huggett.  1976.  Kepone:  hazard to aquatic organisms.  Science 193
     (4253): 528.

Hollister, T. A., G. E. Walsh, and J. Forester.  1975.  Mirex and marine
     unicellular algae:  accumulation, population growth  and  oxygen  evolution.
     Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  14(6): 753-759.

Jaeger, R. J.  1976.  Kepone chronology.  Science 193(4248):  94.

Mount, D. I., and W. A. Brungs.  1967.  A simplified dosing apparatus for
     fish toxicology studies.  Water Res.  1(1): 21-29.

Nimmo, D. R., L. H. Bahner, R. A. Rigby, J. M. Sheppard,  and  A. J.  Wilson,
     Jr.  1977.  Mysidopsis bahia:  An estuarine species  suitable for life-
     - "•• - '-	" - •"-- J - J-~ •.—,•: ^o ~i,!O o-i-UsI Q-F-Pc^J-^ of  q  nn"P uf.lt.   IP
     Proceedings .symposium uii nquaoic lUAicoio^ ano r.^^arj Evaluation.
     (Held in Memphis, Tenn. Oct. 25-26, 1976.)  American Society of Testing
     Materials.  (In press).

--	^., „. ~., „. „. .,„.,.,...., -..- ~. 	......  ...  ..  _. ._		
     1254 on laboratory-reared embryos and fry of sheepshead  minnows
     (Cyprinodon vcriegatus}.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.  103(3): 582-586.

Schimmel, S. C., and A. J. Wilson, Jr.  1977.  Acute toxicity of  Kepone^  to
     four estuarine animals.  Chesapeake Sci.  (In press).

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Committee on Methods for Toxicity
     Tests with Aquatic Organisms.  1975.  Methods for  acute  toxicity tests
     with fish, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians.  Ecol. Res. Ser.  EPA-
     660/3-75-009.  Natl. Environ. Res. Cent., Off. of  Res. & Devel., U.  S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Ore.   v  + 61 p.


                                    29

-------
Walsh, G. E., K.  Ainsworth, and A.  J.  Wilson.   1977.   Toxicity and  uptake of
     Kepone in marine unicellular algae.   Chesapeake  Sci.   (In press).

Woelke, C. E.  1972.  Development of a receiving  water quality bioassay
     criterion based on the 48-hour Pacific oyster (Crasscstrea giaas] embryo
     Washington Dept. Fish. Tech. Rept.  9:  92  p.
                                    30

-------
Reprinted •from
5 August 1977, Volume 197, pp. 585-587
                    Kepone-Induced Scoliosis and Its
                   Histological Consequences in Fish

                  John A. Coucn, James T. Yv'in^teau and Larry li. Goodman
             Copyright £' 1977 by the American Association fnr the Advancement of Science

-------
f
1
 1
 I
Kepone-induced Scoliosis and Its

Histological Consequences in Fish

  Abstract. Scoliosis in fish i.\ caused by several diverse cgen!s r/u: ^n>-~;'"!-.- ,-;r' •>•:
the central nervous system, neuromuscular junctions, or ionic meiabonsm. The or-
ganochiorine pesticide Kepone induces scoliosis in the sheepshead minnow. Some
effects associated with Kepone-induced scoliosis in these fish are disruption ofmyo-
tomal patterns, inter- and intramuscular hemorrhage, fractured centra of vertebrae,
and death. The histological syndrome of Kepone poisoning in fish and the clinical
syndrome in humans suggest that the nervous system is a primary target for Kepone
and that scoliosis is a secondary effect of Kepone poisoning in fish.
1
  We  have  found  that  exposure of
sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon vari-
egatus)  to  a  relatively  low  concentra-
tion of the organochlorine Kepone (deca-
chlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-2//-cy-
clobuta(c.c/]pentalen-2-one) produces a
syndrome in the fish  in which scoliosis,
resulting in  severe spinal column injury,
is  one cardinal  sign. Scoliosis,  lateral
curvature of the spine, has been reported
to  occur in several species of fish as a
result of dietary deficiencies (/). organo-
phosphate and carbamate poisoning (2),
heavy metal exposure (3), and parasitic
infections (4).  This report is concerned
with the severe histological  effects  of
scoliosis in sheepshead  minnows ex-
posed to Kepone in the laboratory.
  Hansen and co-workers (5) first ob-
served scoliosis and blacktail (loss  of
neurologic control of melanocytes in the
caudal region)  as a syndrome of Kepone
exposure in sheepshead minnows. They
experimentally demonstrated that induc-
tion of scoliosis with Kepone was a dose-
dependent, time-related  phenomenon.

-------
Scoliosis occurred  in  sheepshead  min-
nows exposed 1 day to 24 jag of Kepone
per liter. 2 days to 7.8 /ng of Kepone per
liter. 3 days to 1.9 /ug of Kepone per liter.
and 11 days to 0.8 /u.g of Kepone per liter.
All  tests  were   laboratory-controlled
flowing  seawater exposures.
  We repeated exposures of sheepshead
minnows to  Kepone in the  laboratory to
obtain specimens exhibiting scoliosis for
histological study. Twenty juvenile and
ten adult sheepshead minnows were ex-
posed for 17  days  to  flowing seawater
containing 4 ju,g of Kepone per liter at 21°
to 30°C and  23.5 to 29  parts per thou-
                                         sand salinity. Triethylene glycol was the
                                         solvent earner  for  Kepone.  A  second
                                         equivalent group of control fish received
                                         only the solvent carrier chemical in flow-
                                         ing seawater.
                                           All exposed fish exhibited signs of Ke-
                                         pone poisoning  by day  10 of exposure.
                                         These fish demonstrated scoliosis, black-
                                         tail, loss of equilibrium,  sporadic hyper-
                                         kinesis, and tetanic  convulsions. Living
                                         specimens with  various  degrees of sco-
                                         liosis were  selected  from day 10 to day
                                         17 of exposure for standard histoiogicai
                                         fixation and processing.  Fish were fixed
                                         in  Davidson's  fixative,  embedded  in
                             I  •'  .<''>'4  i?-    ''>    "^y^o,,  •''"'•-• \.'i <.\"r
                             I   '   -:-\  fe     -v  ---^  .^:\VX



Fig. I. (a)  Longitudinal histological section from the horizontal plane of normal control fish:
section is at level of spinal column I x? 5). (b) Longitudinal horizontal plane section offish with
advanced scoliosis: the concave region in trunk (arrow) is location of flexure (x3.5).    Fig. 2.
Contorted muscle bundles (arrows) in myotome in concave region  shown  in Fig. Ib; the con-
torted musculature reflects  the tetanic paroxysms that lead to scoliotic flexure of the trunk.
Compare Figs. 1 and 4 ( x 160).    Fig  3. Xeroradiographs of normal sheepshead minnow (a)
and sheepshead minnow with  incipient scoliosis (b): the region of early spinal column flexure
(arrows) shows obvious loss of vertebral periodicity.     Fig. 4  Horizontal plane section from
normal fish showing normal alignment of vertebral centra and normal myotomes in the region of
trunk affected by Kepone-mduced scoliosis in exposed fish ( x |f>0).    Fig. 5. Fractured centra
of vertebra in severely scoiiotic fish exposed to 4 Mg of Kepone per liter for 17 days: distortion
of myotomes and foci of osteoblastic repair tissue at points of breaks in centrum walls is shown
(arrows) (x64).    Fig. 6. Horizontal section through the spinal cord of fish used in Fig. 5 with
fractured vertebra: intrusion of disonented bone (arrows) from neural arch of vertebra against
lateral funiculi of spu-.al cord is shown (x64).
paraffin, and serially sectioned at 7 /xrn—
some through a longitudinal, horizontal
plane (Fig. 1. a and b) and others through
a  sagittal-parasagittal   plane.  Normal
control  fish.-were  processed similarly.
Selected fish with scoliosis  and control
fish were xeroradiographed for  study of
spinal column form.
  Histolog'cal study revealed that fish
with  incipient  scoliosis  had precaudal
trunk flexures resulting from long-term
rigorous contractions of skeletal muscle
in myotomes on one of either  side of
their bodies (Figs, la and 2). Xeroradio-
graphs  show that the major spinal col-
umn flexure occurs in the vicinity of. and
involves, vertebrae  17 through  21  (ce-
phalic  to  caudal   count).   We  have
counted 26 to 27 nonfused vertebrae in
several normal specimens of the sheeps-
head  minnow (Fig.  3).  Normal  muscle
bundle patterns are broken and myotome
boundaries  (septa) are  obscured by the
abnormally contorted  muscle  bundles
(Fig. 2).
  In more advanced cases of scoliosis.
hemorrhagic foci often  occurred  in af-
fected myotomes, suggesting a rupture
of minor vessels or capillaries possibly
caused  by severe contortion of muscle.
The  most  striking  effect observed, al-
ways  in severely scoliotic fish,  was the
breaking of the centra of vertebrae at the
epicenter of flexure in the spinal column
(Figs. 4 and 5). This was accompanied by
apparent osteoblastic repair  tissue  (Fig.
5, arrows) suggesting that the fractures
occurred  --Berime  prior to fixation of
the rish ror Histology. Fish with fractured
vertebrae  also  had  the  greatest  dis-
placement  and  disorientation  of myo-
tomal musculature (Fig. 5). Obstruction
(pmchina) of the dorsal  aorta or caudal
                                                                                 bone  into the neural canal were further
                                                                                 concomitant  results of severe scoliosis
                                                                                 (Fig.  6). Fish thus affected  were para-
                                                                                 lyzed and probably would have died.
                                                                                   No histological  lesions in  the central
                                                                                 nervous system that could have initiated
                                                                                 tetany or paralysis were observed.  We
                                                                                 propose, however, that scoliosis is sec-
                                                                                 ondary  to tetany and paralysis of trunk
                                                                                 musculature  initiated  by  an  undeter-
                                                                                 mined molecular neurological or neuro-
                                                                                 muscular  dysfunction  (or  both), prob-
                                                                                 ably directly caused by Kepone. The ap-
                                                                                 pearance of blacktail (loss of neurologic
                                                                                 control  of  caudal  melanocyte  patterns)
                                                                                 preceding,  during, and  after  scoliosis
                                                                                 strengthens the  possibility that the  ini-
                                                                                 tiating lesion is neurologic (6). Another
                                                                                 possibility  is that systemic calcium me-
                                                                                 tabolism may have been affected by Ke-
                                                                                 pone. Evidence from living and fixed fish

-------
indicate that trunk muscles are unable to
regain normal  tonus and form (Fig. 2).
Tetanic convulsions or chronic muscular
rigor  (or both) are associated with sco-
liosis and probably produce the fractured
vertebrae of severely affected fish. The
possible effects that Kepone may have
on fish calcium metabolism, on the cor-
puscles of Stannius (because of their cal-
cium-mediating role in some fishes), and
on muscle contraction have not yet been
evaluated.
  The   mechanism   or   mechanisms
whereby different organochlorine com-
pounds affect organisms are  poorly un-
derstood. Human victims of Kepone poi-
soning have suffered  tremors, nervous-
ness (hyperkinesis),  loss of memory, and
slurred  speech, among other  effects (7).
The human response syndrome suggests
neurological lesions,  some  of  which
probably occur at higher nervous cen-
ters,  as  a  result of  Kepone  poisoning.
Tremors and other  neurological-depen-
dent responses in laboratory animals in-
creased in  severity  with increasing Ke-
pone  concentration  and duration of ex-
posure  (7).  Hansen, el al. (5) observed
the same correlation between concentra-
tion  of Kepone. duration of exposure.
and  severity  of  scoliosis and  related
signs in fish. Our observations  suggest
that the severity of scoliotic effects in the
tTgheepshead minnow is related to the du-
 ration of continuous exposure to a single
 low  Kepone concentration  (4  /j.g/liter).
 MBch higher concentrations  of Kepone
 ^ to 400 mg/kg per day) are  required to
 elicit  neuropathological,  reproductive,
 and tissue effects in birds or mammals
 (7).
                         JOHN A. COUCH
                    JAMES T. WINSTEAD
                   LARRY  R. GOODMAN
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
 Environmental Research Laboratory.
 Gulf Breeze. Florida 32561


            References and Notes
  I. D Horak, Colo. Dep.  Nat Kesour. Fish. Inf.
    Leafl. No. 29 (1975). J. E. Halver, Fish Nutri-
    tion (Academic Press, New York, 1972).
  2. F. P. Meyer. Prog. Fish Cult. 28. 33 (1966); D. I.
    Mount and C. E. Stephan, Trans. Am. Fish.
    Soc 96. 185(1967), J. A. McCann and R. L.Jas-
    per, ibid 101. 317 (1972); P. Weis and i. S.
    Weis.Environ Res. 12. 196(1976); F. L. Carter.
    thesis, Louisiana State University (1971).
  3. G. W. Holcombe, D. A. Benoil. E. N. Leonard.
    J. M. McKim;y. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33, 1731
    (1976).
  4. G. L. Hoffman. U.S.  Fish Wildl. Sen'. Fish.
    Leafl  No. 508 (1962).
  5. D. J. Hansen, L. R. Goodman. A. J. Wilson, Jr.,
    Chesapeake Sci.. 18. 226 (1977).
  6. K. Wolf and M E. Markiw,  J. Protozoa!. 23,
    425(1976).
  7. J. Raloff. Chemistry 49. 20 (1976); L. Z. McFar-
    land and P B. Lacy, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
    15, 441 (1969); N. Chemoff and E.  H. Rogers,
    ibid. 38, 189(1976)
  8. We thank H. S. Barrett for the radiograph of the
    fish.
 8 March 1977; revised 13 April 1977

-------
Chesapeake Science Vcl  18, No 3, p. 299-308  September 1977


Kepone®  Bioconcentration,

Accumulation,  Loss,  and  Transfer

through  Estuarine Food  Chains.1

                       LOWELL H. BAHNER. ALFRED J.  WILSON. JR..
                       JAMES M. SHEPPARD. JAMES M. PATRICK. JR..
                       LARRY  R.GOODMAN, AND GERALD E.  WALSH
                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                       Environmental Research Laboratory
                       Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
     ABSTRACT:  Accumulation, transfer, and loss of Kepone in estuarine organisms were studied in
     laboratory bioassavs. Kepone was bioconcentrated b\ oysters (Crassosirea virginica), mysids (Mvsi-
     dopsis bahia), grass shrimp (Palaemonetespugio), sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon variegatus),
     and spot (Leiostomusxanlhurus). from concentrations as low as 0.023 fj.g/\ seawater. Bioconcentra-
     tion factors ranged from 10 to 340 in static exposures and 900 to 13,500 in flow-through bioassavs.
     and were dependent on species and exposure duration.
        Depuration of Kepone from oysters in Kepone-free water was rapid (35** loss in 24 hours);
     however, depuration of Kepone was slow in crustaceans and fish, with tissue concentrations
     decreasing 30-50^ in 24-28 days.
        Oysters, fed Chlorococcum containing approximate!)  34 /tig Kepone/g wet weight, attained 0.21
     /*g Kepone/g (wet tissue) in 14 davs.  but  when fed Kepone-free plankton, depurated Kepone to
     below detectable concentrations (<.02 /ig/g) within 10 days.
        *:-;•• --'.Sj'p-.-d -"-.••v.':- u»*»' fH ':-.-.- —',-;!'s; «'-•>> '-~.-J ••'•••.??<* • -- V:-"«-,»;«.'.-!t!i brine shrimp.
     Kepone resiuue* (1.05 /J-K/S wet tissue) in these lish jpproacheu liie concentration of their food
     (1.23 MS/" "et ti^ue): at the lower concentration tested. Kepone concentrations below  detection
     limits (<.2 jjtg/g) in prey accumulated in  the predator to detectable concentrations (0.02 /*g/g>
     within 30 days. Bioaccumulation factors (concentration of Kepone in predator/concentration in
     prej) at 30 dajs were equal  (0.85 spot/mysid; 0.53 mysid/brine shrimp) in the high and low
     concentrations tested. The initial bioconcentration of Kepone from water by plankton was the
     dominant source of Kepone to each member of this food  chain, but significant (>859c) quantities of
     Kepone transferred from prej to predatory fish.
               Introduction
  Contamination of the James River water,
sediments,  and  biota  with  Kepone  has
prompted research to help define the routes
of transfer  ot  the  insecticide  from  water
through  selected estuarine  trophic  levels.
Biota of the James River estuary and Chesa-
peake Bay contain  Kepone (Hansen e't al.
1476). apparently due  to transport  of the
chemical downstream from the freshwater
portion  of the  river. Since no  convenient
   •& Registered trademark. Allied Chemical Corpora-
tion. 4(1 Rector Street. New York. New York 10006.
   1 Contribution No  294. Environmental Research
Laborator\. Gulf Breeze. FL.
method existed to assess the rate of Kepone
movement in the biota of the James River
and  Chesapeake Bay, laboratory biocon-
centration from water and bioaccumulation
from food experiments were designed to de-
termine the rates and magnitudes of Kepone
accumulated  from  water  and  food by se-
lected  estuarine organisms.  It  is  important
to determine the accumulation of Kepone
from water and food  by  various  estuarine
species, so that the  information can be used
in the  decision-making processes  that may
affect the water quality for the biota in the
Chesapeake Bay region, or limit transfer of
Kepone to seafoods consumed by man. The
alga, oyster, mysid. shrimp, and fish used in
                                         299

-------
 300
          L. H. Bahner, et al.
 our experiments are representative of many
 ecologically important species. The top con-
 sumers in our food chains  tested are en-
 demic to both the Chesapeake Bay area and
 northern  Gulf of Mexico and are commer-
 cially important human food items. Leiosto-
 mus xanihurus, the top carnivorous species
 of  one laboratory food-chain, provides  an
 estimated 21.5 million pounds annual recre-
 ational catch  for fishermen  of  the Middle
 Atlantic states (U.S. Department of  Com-
 merce 1975).
  This study  provides information about:
 (1) the rates  and magnitudes  of Kepone
 accumulation from water by estuarine biota;
 (2) rates of Kepone depuration by animals
 in Kepone-free water; and (3) rates of Ke-
 pone  transfer  through  laboratory   food
 chains.

                Methods

    BlOCONCEKTRATION OF KEPONE FROM
     WATER BY ESTUARINE ORGANISMS

                 Oysters
  Eastern  oysters (Crassostrea virginica)
 were  exposed  to Kepone (88% pure) in a
 56-day, flow-through bioassay to determine
 the rates of uptake and depuration of this
 insecticide.  Seawater  (mean temperature
 14.2 C. range  9-20 C; mean salinity 15 %o,
 range  4-22 %o)  was pumped from Santa
 Rosa Sound, Florida, into a-constant-head
 trough  in  the laboratory.  Approximately
 440 I/hour was delivered by siphons to each
 of three 166 1  aquaria. Oysters (100/aquar-
 ium) were not  fed but could obtain plankton
 from  the unfiltered seawater in  which  they
 were  held. Stock  solutions  of  Kepone  in
 triethylene glycol (TEG) were metered into
 the two experimental aquaria at the rate of
 10 ml/day. Measured concentrations of Ke-
 pone  in the two experimental aquaria were
 0.39  and  0.03 fj.g/1 seawater.  A  control
 aquarium  received 10 ml TEG/day.
  Oysters (56 mm to 92 mm. umbo to distal
valve  edge height; x = 71.8 mm) were col-
lected, acclimated to laboratory conditions
for  ten days,  exposed  to Kepone for 28
days,  and then held for 28 days in Kepone-
free  seawater. Five oysters  were  sampled
from each aquarium at  4 hours. 8  hours. 1
 day, 8 days, and twice weekly thereafter to
 day 28. During the 28-day depuration por-
 tion of the test,  oysters were  sampled at
 similar intervals. Analysis methods for  Ke-
 pone  in water and tissues (whole-body,  wet
 weicht) were those of Schimmel and Wilson
 (1977).

               Crustaceans
   Mysids  (Mysidopsis  bahia),  collected
 from  laboratory  cultures  (Nimmo et al.
 1977), were exposed to average measured
 concentrations of 0.026 or 0.41 ^g Kepone/
 1 seawater for 21 days (mean temperature
 27.2 C. range  26-29 C; mean salinity 18 %o,
 range  12-26 %«)  and in a second experi-
 ment, grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio),
 seined and acclimated to experimental con-
 ditions for 10 days, were exposed to average
 measured concentrations of 0.023 or 0.40
 (j.g Kepone/1  seawater in a  28-day,  flow-
 through bioassay (mean temperature 27 C,
 range 26-29 C; mean salinity 25 %o. range
 21-28 %o).  Experimental methods  used
 were  those of Bahner et al. (1975). The
 grass shrimp were held for an additional 28-
 day period in clean seawater to assess  de-
 puration of the insecticide. Filtered seawa-
 ter at a "rate  of  approximately 60 I/hour
 flowed through each  aquarium containing
 mysids or grass shrimp. Mysids and shrimp
 were fed 48-hour-old Anemia nauplii daily.
 Kepone content of mysids and  shrimp  was
 determined weekly during exposure and de-
 puration.  In  a  third experiment,  grass
 shrimp  were collected by  seine from  the
 Lafayette River estuary near Norfolk, Vir-
 ginia, and were held in flowing  seawater
 (mean temperature 25.5 C; mean salinity 15
 %o) in the laboratory to determine the extent
 of depuration of Kepone from field-exposed
 shrimp. These shrimp were analyzed for  Ke-
 pone concentrations on days 7,  11. 17,  and
 21 after being transferred to flowing  Ke-
 pone-free water in our laboratory.

                 Fishes
  Sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon varie-
gatus) adults, acclimated to laboratory  test
 conditions, were  exposed  to an  average
 measured concentration  of 0.05   fj.g   Ke-
 pone/1 of water (mean temperature 30 C;

-------
                                        Kepone Accumulation and Food Cham Transfer
                                                                              301
mean salinity 15 %o. range 8-26 %o) for 28
days, using  the methods of Hansen  et al.
(1977) and were held in Kepone-free  \\ater
for an additional week. Ten fish, generally
five  females and five males, were sampled
on days 0,1,3,7.14.21. and 28 of  expo-
sure to Kepone and on day 7 of depuration.
  Spot   (Leiostomus   xanthurus)   were
seined, acclimated for 10 days, exposed to
average measured  concentrations of 0.029
or 0.4 /j.g Kepone/1 of filtered flowing sea-
\sater (mean temperature 23  C. range 21-
24 C: mean salinity  18 %o.  range 9-24 "/<«,)
for 30 days and  allowed to  depurate the
chemical for 24 days. Composite samples of
three fish were sampled each week for resi-
due  analysis. Spot, exposed to 0.4 /xg Ke-
pone/1 seawater and allowed to depurate for
24 days, were dissected  into liver, brain,
gills, muscle, and offal (rest of body tissues)
and analyzed for Kepone.
  Fillets  (including  scaleless skin) and the
remaining portions of sheepshead minnows
and  spot (wet weight) were  analyzed for
Kepone content. The data were summed-to
calculate concentrations in whole fish.

  BlOACCUMULATION  OF KEPONE IN FOOD
     CHAINS CONSISTING OF  ESTUARINE
               ORGANISMS

        Algae-Ovster Food Chain
  The green alga, Chlorococcum sp., con-
taminated with Kepone was used as food for
oysters to determine if contaminated phyto-
plankton could be a significant source of the
pesticide to  oysters. Chlorococcum sp. was
grown for  6 days in one liter of culture
medium in 2800-ml Fernbach flasks accord-
ing to the method  of Hollister et al. (1975).
Random  cultures  were  dosed with 0.1 mg
Kepone in acetone, while others served as
controls after treatment with acetone alone.
After 24 hours of exposure, algal cultures
(mean wet weight  = 0.15 g) were harvested
by centrifugation and washed three times by
resuspension in clean growth  medium and
centrifugation. The cells were resuspended
in 5 1 of seawater and fed to oysters by using
the methods of Bahner and Nimmo (1976).
Samples of the algae were analyzed daily for
Kepone.
  Rate of Kepone accumulation was deter-
 mined by allowing oysters to feed on control
 or  Kepone contaminated  green algae in
 flowing  seawater.  Oysters  for  this study
 were collected and acclimated for 10 days to
 laboratory conditions in flowing seawater.
 Twenty-four oysters \\ere placed in  each of
 two aquaria (one control and one  experi-
 mental) that received 60 1 filtered seawater/
 hour (mean temperature 22 C. range 21-23
 C; mean salinity 19 %o, range 15-24 %o) and
 were fed approximately 50 ml of the appro-
 priate (control  or contaminated) algal  sus-
 pension at  15-minute intervals for 14 days.
 A 10-day  depuration period followed the
 feeding study during which  the oysters re-
 ceived raw, unfiltered, flowing seawater and
 no additional Chlorococcum. Oysters (n = 3
 per sample) were analyzed for Kepone con-
 tent on daysO.  7. 10/14. 17. and 24 of the
 experiment.


     Plankton-Mvsid-Fis/i Food Chain
  Transfer of Kepone from water to plank-
 ton  to mysids  to fish  was  investigated by
 feeding living brine shrimp nauplii that were
 contaminated with 2.33 ,ug Kepone/g tissue
 to mysids.  that were then fed to spot, the
 top predator of this laboratory food chain.
 Juvenile  spot were  seined  and acclimated
 according  to the methods  previously  de-
 scribed for sheepshead  minnows and spot.
 Mysids (Mysidopsis bahia).  the  intermedi-
 ate food  organism, were collected from  lab-
 oratory  cultures. Commercially available
 brine shrimp eggs were hatched during 48
 hours  in clean  seawater or  in seawater to
 which 0.005 or  0.1 mg Kepone/1 was added
 (Bahner  and  Nimmo   1976).  The brine
 shrimp were harvested daily and served as
 the "planktonic''  food  for the mysids. Ap-
 proximately 40  mysids were  distributed
 among each of six compartments of two 30-1
 aquaria. The compartments were separated
 by coarse nylon  screen that allowed for flow
 of water and  Anemia  throughout each
 aquarium while  confining the mysids to sep-
 arate compartments. Mysids that had fed on
Artcmia for 72  hours were  harvested from
 one  compartment of each  holding  aquar-
 ium, rinsed with  seawater.  and fed to  the
 spot.  Each compartment was refilled with
 mysids to provide for  subsequent  feeding

-------
302
          L. H Bahner, et al
periods. By this method, each of 12 juvenile
spot, (average  length 40 mm), in each of
three 30-1 glass aquaria, were  fed  3  to 5
control  or   contaminated   mysids   daily.
Aquaria containing spot received 60 1 of sea-
\vater/hour to prevent anoxia and to mini-
mize bioconcentration of Kepone depurated
from the  mysids.  Water averaged  19  C
(range  16-21) and 18 %o salinity (range 13-
23 %o). Brine shrimp. 30 to 45  mysids.  2 to
3 spot,  and water from each aquarium were
analyzed weekly for Kepone.

          Results and Discussion

    BIOCONCENTRATION FROM  SEAWATER
  Kepone was bioconcentrated  from water
by  oysters,  mysids.  grass shrimp, sheeps-
head minnows,  and  spot in  all concentra-
tions tested  (Figs. 1. 2. 3. 4, and 5; Table
1). and all  species  showed  nearly  equili-
brated  tissue concentrations  of Kepone
within  8 to  17 days  after exposure  to  Ke-
pone began  in water. Bioconcentration  fac-
tors for Kepone  in  these  species  ranged
from 2.300  to 13.500 in long-term (>96
hrs) flow-through  bioassays (Table 2).  Ke-
pone bioconcentrated in oysters to approxi-
mately  10.000 times the concentration in
the exposure water within 19 days. Mysids
bkvcncjr,;riac-i Kcpor.c up to 13.000 time".
the amount  measured in  the  exposure  wa-
                         039u»/l
                 OOJjJj/l
                          iND
          10     20
        -ACCUMULATION —
                   TW£ {40)1)
  Fig. 1. Bioconcentralion of Kepone from water con-
taining average measured concentrations ol 0.03 or
0.39 /ug/l by oysters (Crassostrea virgmica) exposed for
28 days,  and its depuration b> oysters placed in Ke-
pone-free  water  for  28 days  (mean temperature
14.2°C. mean salinity  15 "/i»). ND = not detectable.
<0.02 pig/g wet weight.
ter. Each mysid (mean live-weight = 2.5 mg
for 66  aduits), exposed  to  0.026  ^tg Ke-
pone/1 for 14 days contained approximately
5.9 ng  Kepone; therefore, this amount of
the chemical could enter food chains of estu-
arine predators that consumed  each mysid.
Stomachs  of flounders from  Chesapeake
Bay (standard length 25  to  174 mm) con-
* KT'
                           \
                           04liig/l
                     12    16
                     TIME (days)
                                    24
                                         2B
   Fig. 2. Bioconcentration of Kepone from water con-
taining average measured concentrations of 0.026 or
0 41 jig/1 by mysids (Mysidopsis bahw) exposed for 21
days (mean temperature 27.2°C; mean salinity 18 %o).
_  '°r
                                 • WHOLE BOOT
                                 * FIELD EXPOSED
  Fig. 3. Bioconcentration and depuration of Kepone
in crass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) during 56-day
study. Circles indicate concentrations of Kepone accu-
mulated from water containing average measured con-
centrations of 0.023 or 0.4 /ig/1 by grass shrimp ex-
posed in the laboratory for 28  days, and its depuration
by shrimp placed in Kepone-free water for 28  d.iys
(mean temperature 27°C. mean salinity 2? V). Trian-
gles indicate concentrations in shrimp collected from
Lafayette  River. Norfolk. Virginia and held in clean
flowing seawater at the ERL, Gulf Breeze, for 21  days
(mean temperature 25.5°C;  mean  salinity 15  %o).
Dashed line represents extrapolation to initial concen-
tration at beginning of depuration.

-------

                                          Kepone Accumulation and Food Chain Transfer
                                                                                   303

    ID''
  J3
  E
  to
  bj
  —i
                                                                        • WHOLE  BODY
                                                                        • FILLET
                                                       10     20
                                                     -ACCUMULATION —
                             40
                            -DCPUOATION
   Fig. 5. Bioconcentration of Kepone from water con-
 taining average  measured concentrations of 0.029,
 0.40,  1.5*. 3.4*, 44'. 12.0*, and 16.0* Mg/l by spot
 (Leioswmu<; xanthurus) exposed for 4 or 30 days, and
 its depuration by fish placed in Kepone-free water for
 24 days (mean temperature 23°C; mean salinity 18 %o).
 *Data from Schimme! and Wilson (1977).
fj.g Kepone  after 28  days of exposure  to
0.05  (tig Kepone/1 seawater. Kepone  con-
centrations  were  slightly higher  in female
sheepshead minnows (0.35  jug/a)  than male
fish (0.25 /ig/g).
   Spot, a commercially valuable  food  fish,
bioconcentrated  Kepone from 0.029  /xg/1
seawater; each fish (mean weight 1.4 g) con-
tained approximately 0.13 /u.g Kepone. The
bioconcentration factors for Kepone  in fish
were  similar to those of other chlorinated
hydrocarbon insecticides (Schimmel et al.
1975; Schimmel et al. 1976). Kepone accu-
mulated in edible fillets to  near the whole-
body  concentrations in fish (Figs. 4, 5,& 6);
therefore, one of the largest reserves (22 %)
of Kepone in absolute weight is in  the edible
portion of contaminated fish. Although the
greatest body burdens of Kepone  on  a  wet-
weight basis  are in the  brain, liver, and gill
tissues, the relatively  large  size of muscle
and offal tissues contributes large Kepone
reserves to higher trophic levels (Fig. 6).
   Depuration of Kepone was not consistent
among the species tested. Clearance  of the
chemical from  oysters was relatively  rapid.
with no Kepone detected within 7 to 20 days
after  exposure  ceased  (Fig. 1). Depuration
of Kepone from laboratory exposed grass
shrimp  (Fig. 3) and fish (Fig. 4  & 5) was
slower;  Kepone  concentrations  were  re-
duced 30-50% in 24  to 28  davs.  Grass

-------
                                          ..1
TAHl H
exposed
1 . Concentrations of Kepone (^
to 0.026 or 0.4 1 /ug/l for 2 1 d.iys.
:/£ wet tissue) measured in oysters (C. virginica) exposed to 0 03 or 0.39 /u.g/1 for 28 days, mysids (M. ba/iui)
fji.iss shrimp (/' piigii)) exposed to 0 023 or 0 40 yitg/l for 28 days, sheepshead minnows (C. viiru'Ktiliif) exposed
to 0 05 /jg/l for 28 days, and spot ( /, mntliiuitt ) exposed to 0 02V or 0.4 /j.g/1 for 30 days in flowing water experiments. Animals were allowed to depuiate
Kepone

Duia-
tion of
l.xpo-
sure
(Days)
1/6
1/3
1
2
3
4
7
8
9
1 1
12
14
15
19
21
25
28
30
Duration
of De-
puration
1/6
1/3
1
2
4
7
11
14
21
24
28
lot up to
Oysters
0 0.1
MP/I


Whole
Body
0012
0 031
0.036
_
—
0.11
—
0.18
—
—
0.21
—
0.20
0 29
0.23
0.19
0.21*
-



0.30
0 30
0.14
-
0.074
v.inj> seawater.
Mysids Shrimp
041 0 02.1
Mg/l Mg/l


Whole Whole
Body Body


- —
<0.02
_ _
2.0
3.3 0.038

0 072
6.3

4.7 0.088
_ _

4.8* 0.12

0.087*
-






0.1

0.1

0.084
0.055
_
0.035

Shrimp
040
Mg/1


Whole
Body


_
0.27
_

0.47

1.79


2.18
_

3.15

4.57*
-






2.62

2.5

1.78
1.5
—
0..84

Minnows Minnows Spot Spot Spot Spot
Dura- 0.05 005 0029 0.029 0.40 040
tion of /jig/i /ig/l Mg/' Mg/' Mg/' Mg/l


sure Whole Whole Whole
(Days) Muscle Body Muscle Body Muscle Body
1/6
1/3
1 <0.01 <().()!
2
3 0.019 0.031
4
7 0.086 0.14 <0.02 0.037 0.50 0.73
8
9
11
12
14 0.19 0.22
15 - 0.055 0.072 0.86 0.76
19
21 0.21 0.24
25
28 0.29* 0.37*
30 - - 0.048* 0.093* 0.99* 0 94*
Duration
of De-
puration
1/6
1/3
1
2
4
7 0.21 0.22 0.074 0.093 0.87 1.04
11
14 - - - 0.57 0.72
21
24 - 0.031 0.0469 0.38 0.52
28
                                                                                                                                              CO
                                                                                                                                              o
                                                                                                                                              I

                                                                                                                                              CD
1'inal day of exposure.

-------
                                         Kepone Accumulation and Food Cham Transfer
                                                                                  305
TABLE 2. Bioconcentration factors for selected species exposed to measured concentrations of Kepone in water
Species
CMorococcum sp.
Chlorococcum sp.
Crassostrea \ irgmica
Crassostrea virginica
Anemia sa/ina
Anemia sahna
Mysidopsis bahia
Mvsidopsis bahia
Paliiemoneies pugio
Palaemoneles pugio
Cypnnodon variegatus
Leiostomus xanlhurus
Leiostornus xanlhurus
Leiostomus xanthurus
Leiostomus xanlhurus
Leiostomus xanlhurus
Leiostomus \unthurus
Leioslomus xanthurus
Exposure
Concentration
(Mg/D
100. (static)
40. (injection)
0.03
0.39
5. (static)
100. (static)
0.026
0.41
0.023
0.4
0.05
0.029
0.4
1.5*
3.4*
4.4*
12.0*
16.0*
Duration of
Exposure
(days)
1
2
19
21
2
2
21
21
28
28
28
30
30
4
4
4
4
4
Mean
Bioconcentration
Factor
340
6.000
9,354
9,278
10
23
5.962
13,473
5,127
11.425
7,115
3.217
2,340
1,120
941
1.591
900
1.050
  * Data from Schimmel and Wilson (1977).

shrimp from  the Lafayette River depurated
Kepone at rates similar to those of labora-
tory exposed shrimp with  approximately
20% of the Kepone lost  during 21  days in
seawater containing no Kepone. Spot  that
were exposed to Kepone for 30  days  and
allowed to depurate for 24 days, contained
highest Kepone concentrations in brain, fol-
lowed bv  liver,  gills, and muscle (Fig.  6).
Many chlorinated chemicals are highly con-
centrated  in  liver  and other fattv tissues
(Parrish et al.  1974; Parrish et af. 1975).
but  the  unusual  distribution  of  Kepone
might be  explained by its water  solubility
relative to  other insecticides.
  BlOACCUMULATlON OF KEPONE IN FOOD
    CHAINS CONSISTING OF ESTUARINE
                ORGANISMS

         Algae-Oyster Food Chain
  Chlorococcum. grown in media enriched
to 0.1  mg Kepone/1, bioconcentrated the
chemical to a  mean  of 34 /ig/g  in  whole
cells:  the bioconcentration factor in these
static  exposures was  340X  (Table 2). In
preliminary tests, continuous infusion of 2.1
pig Kepone/hour into  static cultures of Chlo-
rococcum produced cells with bioconcentra-
tion factors near 6000 x within 48 hours;
adsorption  of Kepone by the cells and  ves-
sels limited the average measured concen-
     _.^ -  •_
   Fig. 6. Distribution of Kepone in selected tissues of
spot (Leioslomusxanlhurus). Spot were e\po>ea io U 4
/xg Kepone/1 tor 30 days and allowed to depurate and
equilibrate vr an additional 24 > prior to ^jmrim;
(mean temperature 23°C; mean salinity 18 %o).  Per-
centage oi whole-body Kepone burden in five tissues is
on left. Measured residues (wet weight) are on right

tration in the media to approximately 0.04
mg/1. Continuous exposure in this  test is
probably  more  representative of those  oc-
curring in an estuary, and places the impor-
tance of  bioconcentration of  Kepone  by
phytoplankton in proper perspective.
  Oysters  bioaccumulated Kepone to 0.21
pig/g when fed Chlorococcum sp. containing
an average of 34 ptg Kepone/g for 14 days
(Fig. 7; Table 3). Kepone in feces and pseu-
dofeces from these  oysters  averaged 1.78
/ug Kepone/g (dry weight). Kepone was not
detectable in  the unfiltered water samples;
shell growth  was evident;  and all  oysters
gained weight during the test. Weight gain

-------
306
          L H  Bahner, et al.
                  TIME (doyt)
   Fig. 7. Bioaccumulation  of  Kepone by oysters
 (Crassostrea virginica) that consumed algae (Chloro-
 coicum sp.) with  residues of 34 ^g  Kepone/g (wet
 weight) Oyster1; fed on contaminated algae for 14 days
 (mean water temperature 22°C; mean salinity 19 %o),
 and were then fed uncontammated plankton for  an
 additional 10 days to allow depuration of the chemical.
 ND = not detectable, <0.02  /ig/g wet weight

 in exposed oysters was not different  than
 control  oysters (analysis of covariance. a =
 0.05). Kepone concentrations in oysters fed
 the contaminated algae appeared to almost
 reach equilibrium in 14 days; but quantity of
 K.T;-T.;- trnn^fj-rco :rom rhoc aigac to oys-
 ters was limited, probably due to rapid de-
 ouratirn of tb; cr^rv.io'.1.! fr^-"' ''.•; •'• -t;-r-.
 •xepone was not actectable (<0.(J2 /u.g/g)  10
 days after the oysters received no contami-
 nated food.  Most  Kepone was depurated
 from oysters within 96  hours;  therefore, if
 •"•yster^.  in the n:::i:rai > ^  '•  •••'•.:•;  ^ •".',., ••
 measurable  Kepone residues,  a recent  or
 continuous source  of Kepone from water
 and/or food has been available.
   The maximum overall accumulation and
 transfer  of  Kepone or food-chain  factor
 from \\ater  to  algae and finally to oysters
 was 2.1  (Table 4). The food-chain factor
 was obtained by dividing the concentration
 of the contaminant in the final consumer by
 the concentration of the contaminant in the
 water of the priman producer.  The concen-
 tration measured in each consumer can be
 compared uith a lower  trophic level to de-
 termine  the bioaccumulation factor of the
 contaminant  for that  predator-prey  pair.
 Bioaccumulation factor is similar to biocon-
centration factor, but the contaminant  is  in
food and is consumed by the predator.  The
                                               TABLE 3. Concentrations ot kepone (^g-g whole
                                               body, wet tissue) measured in oysters (C  virgmica) fee
                                               algae (Chlorococcum sp.) containing 34 /xe/g for 14
                                               days and in spot (L. xanrhiirus) fed mysids (.V/. bahia
                                               containing 0.02 jig/g (estimated) or 1.03 /ug-g for 30
                                               days in flowing water experiments. Oysters were fed
                                               uncontaminated plankton for an additional 10 days tc
                                               allow depuration of the chemical.
Duration
of
Exposure
(Days)


0
5
7
10
14
20
30
Duration
of
Depur-
ation
3
10


Oysters
fed 34 p.g/g
Hg/'g
Whole Body
<0.02
—
0.10
0 18
0.21*
_
-




0.075
<0.02


Spot fed 0.02 M&'E
(Esumated)
^g/g
Whole Body
<0.02
<0.02
—
<0.02
—
<0.02
0.015.0.024*




_
-


Spot fed
1.03 ^ig/g
Mg/g
W hole Body
<0.02
0.095
_
0.15
—
0 59
1 0.1.1*




—
-
  * Final day of exposure.

TABLE 4. Kepone transfer in algae-oyster tood chain.
Algae (Chlorococcum sp.) grown in Kepone enriched
media for 24 hri was fed 'oo\sters(C. virj;i>!;rfl)for 14
days in flou-throush feeding experiment
                       Control
                      food chain
\ij  rvepone     Dingle
   dose) in algal media
   (mg/l)
(21  Kepone residues in
   algae after 24 hrs oi
   factor from  water
   lorn]
(4) Kepone  residues in
   oysters  after   14
   days of feeding
(5) Bioaccumulation
   factor from algae to
   oysters j(4)/(2)]
(6) Food  chain  factor
                       Control
                       Control
                       (ND)"
                       Control
                       (ND)*
                                  Evposed
                                  food chain
                                      0.1
                                       .007
                                      2.1
  * ND = non-detectable (<0.02 mg/kg).

bioaccumulation factor for oysters consum-
ing algae  under these test  conditions was
only IK007 (Table  4). These  data  indicate
that transfer of Kepone from  algae by oys-
ters was inefficient, or that  the uptake was
masked  by the oyster's ability to depurate
the chemical quickly.

-------
                                             Kepone Accumulation and Food Crta.n Transfer
                                                                                         307
     Plankton-Mysid-Fish Food Chain
  Spot accumulated Kepone  by consuming
live  mysids that  had  grazed on  Kepone-
laden  brine shrimp  (Fig. 8;  Tables  3,  5).
Brine  shrimp  exposed to 0.1 mg Kepone/1
seawater contained whole-body residues of
2.33  ju.g/g  after 48 hours. Mysids that  fed
for 72 hours  on  these  brine shrimp con-
tained  1.23 /j.g Kepone/g. Kepone concen-
trations in  spot that consumed the  mysids
           ACCUMULATE* TMHOUGM fOC» LEVEL fOOO CHA*
   Fig. 8.  Block  diagram of four-level tood chain.
Nominal concentrations of Kepone in water (left) were
control (bottom), 0.005  mg/1 (center),  and  .1 mg/1
(top). Anemia salina naupln. hatched in these concen-
trations ot  Kepone. were fed to mysids (Mysidopsis
biitud). and m\sids were fed to spot  (Leiostomus xan-
'.'':,':•  >        • - Average mea^v.-j concentrations
of Kepone.  . »JL.I .rop/nc specie^ is _.'•tv.itT ;crr": -*oiarc was 1S*~C
and mean salinity 18 %«.
TABLE 5. Kepone transfer in plankton-mysid-fish food chain. Brine shrimp (A. salina) were hatched during 48
hrs in Kepone enriched seawater and were fed to mysids (M. bahia) for 72 hrs. Mvsids were then fed to spot (L.

(1) Kepone (single dose) in hnne shrimp me-
dia (mg/l)
(2) Kepone residues in brine shrimp after 48
hrs of exposure (mg/kg)


(3) Bioconcentration factor from water [(2)/
(01
(4) Kepone residues in mvsids after 72 hrs of
feeding (mg/kg)


(5) Bioaccumulalion factor from brine shrimp
to m\sid- |(4)/(2)J
(6) Kepone residues in spot after 30 days of
teedins! (mg/kg)

(7) Bioaccumulation factor from mysids to
spot [<6)/(4)]
(8) Food chain factor |(6)/(1)]
food chain
Control

Control
(ND)*


-

Control
' (ND)'


—

Control
(ND)*

—

-
food chain
0.005

0.044
0.043
0.058
x = 0.050
10.

x = 0.023
(estimated)


0.5
(estimated)
0.015
0.024
x = 0.0195
>0.85
(estimated)
>3.9
food chain
0.!

1.3
2.4
3.3
x = 2.33
23.3

0.89
1.0
1.8
x = 1.23
0.53

1.0
1.1
\ = 1 .05
>0.85

>10.5
* ND = non-detectable (<0.02 mg/kg).

-------
 308
           L H. Bahner, et al
: ^•£'.-t&'f-~-f~£
   Mvsids. which  consumed  Anemia  with
 residues of 0.05 or 2.33 /u.g Kepone/g (wet
 weight), attained 0.023 (estimated) or 1.23
 /jig Kepone/g whole-body residues within 72
 hours. The estimated 0.023  ju.g Kepone/g
 whole-body  mvsids. obtained by assuming
 the bioaccumulation  factor of 0.85  (Table
 5) for Kepone transfer from  mysids to fish
 as observed in the food chain beginning with
 0.1  mg/1.  also occurred in the food chain
 that  began with 0.005 mg Kepone/1. The
 residue in mysids was then estimated to be
 0.023  yu.g  Kepone/g. which was consistent
 with  the estimated bioaccumulation factor
 of 0.5  for Kepone transfer from Anemia to
 mysids for 72 hours. The food-chain  factors
 were different for this food chain (3.9 com-
 pared to  10.5).  since the  bioconcentration
 factor for Kepone by  brine shrimp from the
 lower concentration in  water (0.005 mg/1)
 was less  than that from the higher concen-
 tration (0.1 mg/1). The initial  bioconcentra-
 tion of Kepone  from  water by planktonic
 food  organisms was the dominant source of
 Kepone to each member of this food chain.
 since bioaccumulation factors were less than
 unity.
   In  the field, lower  concentrations  of Ke-
 ^One if! ^e^'-V  '*  ~ '•"••'1'^ t->->^nl* -p •   -'•- -1- '^_
 tion or Kepone residues, tound in the fish of
 this food chain because the plankton could
 be expected to be chronical!) exposed to the
 contaminant.  Thus,  the food-chain  factor
 would be expected to increase  in the natural
 environment  since  bioconcentration factors
 .\>r  a  chionnatcu  iisarocaroon  pesticide
 (DDT) in feral plankton ha\e been  shown
 :.; exceed  4nnn\  /CoN  ;^~:).  H;y.\cwr.
 bioconcentration of Kepone could oversha-
 dow the  amount of the chemical received
 from food by  the  animals in this food chain.
 Approximately 3.000  times as much  Ke-
 pone  in  food as in water  was needed  to
produce similar concentrations in spot in 28
to 30 days. Therefore, bioconcentration  of
Kepone was  dominant in this food  chain.
but significant quantities  (>85%) of  Ke-
pone  transferred  from  prey to predatory
fish. Rapid uptake  from  water and food.
slow depuration,  and appreciable solubility
in water indicate  that  Kepone will  transfer
through food  \\ebs and pose threats to con-
sumers.
             LITERATURE CITED
 BAHNER. L. H.. AND D. R. NIMMO. 1976. A precision
   She-feeder for flow-through larval culture or food
   chain bioassays. Prog. Fish-Cult. 38:51-52.
 	. C. D 'CRAFT. AND  D.  R.  NIMMO 1975  A
   saltwater flow-through -bioassay  method with con-
   trolled temperature and salinity. Proq. Fish-Cult.
   37:126-129.
 Cox. J. L. 1971. DDT residues in seawater and panic-
   ulate matter in the California  current system. U.S.
   Natl. Mar. Fish Serv. Fish. Bull. 69:443-450.
 HANSEN. D. J.. A. J. WILSON.  D  R. NIMMO. S. C.
   SCHIMMEL. L. H. BAHNER. AND R. HUGGETT. 1976.
   Kepone: Hazard to aquatic organisms. Science. 193:
   528.
 	. L. R. GOODMAN. AND A  J. \\ILSON.JR  1977
   Kepone: Chronic effects on embryo, fry. juvenile.
   and adult sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon vane-
   gaius). Chesapeake  Sci. 18(2).227-232.
 HOLLISTER. T. A.. G. E.  WALSH. AND J. FORESTER.
   1975. Mirex and marine unicellular algae: accumula-
   tion, population growth and oxygen evolution. Bull.
   Environ. Cnmam. To.iicoi. 14-753-759.
 MARKEL. D. F.. AND G. C. GRANT 1970. The summer
   food habits of young-of-the-year striped bass in three
   Virginia  rivers. Chesapeake Sci. ll(l):50-54.
 NIMMO.  D. R.. L H. BAHNER.  R  A. RIGBV. J. M.
   SHEPPARD.  AND  A.  J. WILSON  1977. "Mysidopsis
   balna":  An  estuanne species suitable for life-cycle
   bioassays in determining sublethal effects of a pollu-
   tant. Presented at the Symposium on Aquatic Toxi-
   cology and Hazard Evaluation. American Society of
   Testmc  Materials.  Memphis.  Tennessee. October
   25-26'1976.
 "••    , ° R .  J. A CuLLh.  J.  FuKLMtk.  J  M.
   PATRICK. JR.. AND  G  H  COOK. 1974  Dieldnn
   Effects  on  Se\eral Estuanne Organisms.  Proc.
   27th Annu  Conf. Southeast  Assoc. Game  Fish
   Comm. 1973. p 427-434.
 PARRISH. P. R.. G. H COOK. AND J  M. PATRICK. JR.
   1975. Hexachlorobenzene: Effects on Several Estua-
   nne Animals. Proc. 2Sth  Annu  Conf  Southeast
   .-V-.K. O..mc F:sn v_\irnm.. i-J~4  p.  IT1—1,S~
 SCHIMMEL.  S. C , AND  A. J WILSON. JR. 1977. Acute
   toxicity of Kepone to t
-------
                  Effects of Kepone on Estuarine Microorganisms




                A.W.  Bourquin, P.H. Pritchard, and k.R. Mahaffey




                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency




                        Environmental Research Laboratory




                            Gulf Breeze, FL  32561
                    Developments in Industrial Microbiology




                      (Society for Industrial Microbiology)




                              (In press, Volume 19)
ERL-GB Contribution No.

-------
                                 INTRODUCTION




     Aquatic microorganisms undoubtedly play a critical role in the metabolic




transformation of organic and inorganic compounds which enter lakes,




estuaries, and oceans.  Some of these compounds,  particularly the chlorinated




hydrocarbon group, degrade very slowly in nature  and consequently their fate




and accumulation are of great importance in determining environmental  quality.




Since many chlorinated hydrocarbons accumulate in terrestial and aquatic




ecosystems, they could eventually alter basic microbial degradation processes




if the compounds were toxic to the microorganisms.  For example, interferences




in the competition among bacteria in a natural population,  due to the




elimination of an important member of that population,  could reduce trans-




formation efficiency and even effect the extent of transformation.   The




possibility that pesticide residues may have deleterious effects on




microorganisms and their activities has received  considerable attention




(Alexander 1968, Edwards 1972, Tu and Miles 1976, Ware  and  Roan 1970).   The




emphasis of these studies, however, has been on the effects of pesticide




residues on soil rather than aquatic microorganisms. Although the effects of




pesticides on phytoplankton and photosynthesis has been docu-




mented (Ware & Roan 1970), information is lacking on the effects of organo-




chlorines on aquatic microorganisms and the processes they  mediate. Several




important organochlorine compounds have been tested for their toxicity to




aquatic microorganisms.  Bourquin et al. (1975) and Bourquin and Cassidy




(1975) have shown polychlorinated biphenyls to be toxic to  a variety of




bacteria isolated from estuarine waters.  Using the agar-disc diffusion




method, the investigators found that 0.1 mg of Aroclor  12^42 per disc elicited




definite zones of inhibition.  They also showed that, by documenting




physiological characteristics relative to toxicant-sensitive and

-------
toxicant-insensitive groups,  certain characteristics correlated  with  one  group




more than another.  Richards  (1977)  has shown that pentachlorophenol  in




flowing sea water systems caused the selection of PCP-tolerant microorga-




nisms.  Brown et al. (1975b)  have shown that mirex was nontoxic  to aquatic




bacteria but Kepone, a contaminant of mirex, was toxic.   Kepone  may be  a




chemical breakdown product of mirex (Carlson et al. 1976).




     Kepone^ (decachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-roetheno-2fi-cyclobuta  (cd)  pentalene-




2-one), an insecticide, has been shown to be an extensive contaminant of  the




James River System in Virginia (U.S. EPA, 1975).  Its introduction into the




James River was due to industrial effluents.  Recent studies  have  shown that




Kepone is toxic to algae (Walsh et al.  1977) and several estuarine animals




(Schimmel and Wilson 1977).  This paper reports on the toxicity  of Kepone to




estuarine bacteria.




                             MTERIALS AND METHODS




Bacterial Cultures




     bacterial isolates obtained from Range Point salt marsh  (Pensacola Beach,




Florida), Escambia Bay surface water, and Sabine Island disposal pond were




used in disc-agar sensitivity assays.  These pure cultures  of bacteria  and




fungi were originally isolated from batch culture enrichments on various




carbon sources and maintained as part of our laboratory stock culture




collection.   Samples of water and sediment from these waters and  the Gulf  of




Mexico were used in all mixed-culture toxicity testing.   Isolates  from  these




environments were used to determine the effects of Kepone on  growth and the




oxidation of specific substrates.
Registered trademark,  Allied Chemical  Corp.,  hew 1'ork.   Mention  of trade



 names in this publication does not  constitute endorsement by  the U.S.




 Environmental Protection Agency.

-------
    Low concentrations of the insecticide Kepone,  approaching  those  found  in




contaminated James River sediment,  were shown to  be inhibitory to  the  growth




and oxygen uptake of microorganism  randomly  selected from estuarine




environments.  No significant correlations were noted between  growth



inhibition by Kepone and cell morphology, aliphatic hydrocarbon utilization,




pesticide tolerance, selected enzyme activities,  nitrate reduction,  and  urea




hydrolysis.  Oxygen uptake by pure  cultures  grown on glucose or hydrocarbons



at cell densities equivalent to  103 - 101* cells/ml was decreased by  60-100£ at



Kepone concentrations of 0.02 -2.0 mg/1. Total  viable counts from  estuarine




water or sediments grown aerobically on agar media containing  0.02 mg/1  Kepone



were reduced by 6 - 78 °/oo.  Ihe inhibitory effect was partially  eliminated



when sediment populations were grown anaerobically.

-------
Reagents and Chemicals




     Kepone (98$ pure) was obtained from Chem Services, Inc., West Chester,




PA.  N,N-dinethylforamide (DMF) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.,




Milwaukee, Viisc.  Microbiological media and substrates were obtained from




Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI.









     Zobell's 2216 marine medium Z-15 (Aaronson 1970) was prepared at a final




salinity of 15 °/oo using fiila Marine Mix (Rila Products, Teaneck, N.J.).




Solid medium was prepared with 2% Bacto-agar.  Minimal salts basal medium




(MSB) was prepared according to Stanier et al. (1966).  Glucose (0.2%) was




added to MSB as a growth substrate and $.01% yeast extract (Difco) was added




to compensate for any auxotrophic cultures.




     Kepone-harine agar medium was prepared by adding desired concentrations




of Kepone (in acetone carrier) to Zobell's medium after autoclaving.  Acetone




control plates (no Kepone) were used in all experiments.




Pure Culture Inhibition Studies; Disc Sensitivity Assays




     Pure.cultures, grown in Zobell's (Z-15) broth for two 18 hr growth cycles




were spread on Z-15 agar plates.  Three filter paper discs (Schleicher &




Schuell, 12.7 mm, No.  7^0-E, Keene, NH),  designed for antibac-




terial substrate testing, were saturated  with acetone or DMF solutions




containing 0.01,  0.1,  or 1.0 rag Kepone per milliliter, dried, and then placed




on the inoculated agar plate.  A fourth disc contained only DMF or acetone.




The actual volume of Kepone  solution per  disc was calculated to be 0.11 y£  by




determining the average increase in weight of a DMF or acetone saturated disc.




Mixed Culture Inhibition Studies




     Water and sediment samples collectd  from James River,  VA.,  and various




estuarine and marine areas near Pensacola Beach were serially diluted in water

-------
blanks of the appropriate salinity and plated on 2.-15 agar plates with and




without Kepone.  The plates were incubated aerobically at 28°C and colonies




were counted at 4- and 8-day intervals.  Sediment samples were similarly




plated and incubated anaerobically in BBL Disposal Anaerobic Systems (EBL,




Baltimore, hd.) at 28° for 8 days.  Dominant colony types from the aerobic




Kepone containing plates were picked with sterile toothpicks and spotted onto




Z-15 agar.  The resulting colonies were replicated onto various differential




and selective media for physiological characterization.




Oxygen Uptake Studies




     Selected pure cultures aerobic Kepone plates were grown in 100 ml of




either 2-15 broth or MSB broth with glucose or succinate (0.2%) for 18 hr




prior to harvesting by centrifugation (10Xg, 10 min.).  The cells were washed




once with 0.05 M ^HPOij buffer (pH 7.5) containing 1.5$ NaCl and finally




resuspended in 2 ml of saline buffer.  Suspensions were kept in an ice bath




until used.  Oxygen uptake was determined by a Gilson Oxygraph (Model K-ICT-C,




Gilson Electronics, hiddleton, Vvisc.) equipped with a Clark electrode.  The




reaction vessel contained 1.7 - 1.8 ml phosphate buffer, 10 - 50 y£  washed




cell suspension (100-300 yg protein), and 10 - 50 mg oxidizable substrate.




After a baseline level of oxygen uptake was established, 10 y£  of Kepone




solution (0.19 - 19.0 yg Repone/£  DKF) was added to the reaction vessel and




the oxygen uptake observed for any resulting effects.  A positive control, 10




y& of a pentachlorophenol solution (20 mM), was then put in the same reaction




vessel.




hethods




     Physiological characterization of isolates on differential and selective




media was carried out according to the methods of Colwell and Weibe (1970).




The ability of isolates to grow on hydrocarbons (hexadecane,  undecane,

-------
octadecane, benzene, naphthalene,  biphenyl,  xylene,  toluene)  was determined by




placing hydrocarbon-saturated filter paper discs in the lids  (for volitale




hydrocarbons) or on the agar (for  nonvolitale hydrocarbons) of MSB agar plates




streaked with the appropriate isolate.  The appearance of growth on the agar




whicn was greater than the control plates was taken to be hydrocarbon utili-




zation by the isolate since no other carbon source was supplied.  Pesticide




tolerance tests (using toxaphene,  Arochlor 1242, methoxychlor,  heptachlor,




DDT, raalathion, pentachlorophencl) were performed using the disc-aear




diffusion method and recording effects on growth of isolates  streaked on MSB




agar containing glucose or succinate and yeast extract.




     Protein determinations were performed according to the methods of Lowry




et al. (1951).




                                    RESULTS




Pure Culture Toxicitv Studies




     The toxicity of Kepone to a variety of pure cultures from our laboratory




collection was determined by the disc agar diffusion sensitivity method.




Table 1 shows the degree of toxicity as expressed by the size of the zone of




inhibition.  Only the sensitive cultures are shown.   Several  of the isolates




(MO.'S 1, 3, ^i 11, 1^, 15, 29) were particularly sensitive (as judged by the




size of the zone of inhibition) to Kepone.  Chemical analysis has shown Kepone




to be 99!» pure with no trace (less than 0.5 ng/ml) of other chlorinated




compounds.   Of the 26 isolates tested, 33% were inhibited at  the 3.65 yg/disc




concentration and 50? were inhibited at the 1M.6 yg/disc concentration.




Fifteen percent of the isolates were inhibited at the 1.U6 yg/disc




concentration.  Higher concentration of Kepone (20 yg/disc) inhibited 100? of




the isolates.

-------
     Of the six fungal cultures tested, one was poisoned at the 14.6 yg/disc




concentration.  Two yeasts, Candida maltosa and Candida lipolvtica.  were both




sensitive but at higher concentrations of Kepone than used with the  bacteria




tested.




     Kepone-sensitive cultures (i.e., showing zones of inhibition with disc




assay) showed no significant correlation (a = 0.05) with morphology, gram




stain, hydrocarbon utilization, pesticide tolerance, amylolytic,  lipolytic,




and proteolytic activity, nitrate reduction, sugar utilization and urea




hydrolysis.  These results are summarized in Table 2.




Nixed Culture_Toxicity Studies




     To determine the toxicity of Kepone to mixed populations of bacteria from




a variety of marine habitats, total viable counts were performed with Zobell's




seawater agar (2-15) containing dissolved Kepone.  Results of these  assays




(Table 3) are expressed as the percentage reduction in colony forming units




(CFU) normalized against control plates that contained no Kepone.  Ihe results




demonstrate that Kepone, in concentrations as low as 20 Vg/&, is inhibitory to




the development of colonies on an agar plate.  Different degrees of  inhibition




(concentrations of Kepone which would give the same reduction in CFU's) were




noted with samples taken from the same area at different times.   In  many




cases, concentrations below 20 ug/£ were inhibitory.  Within each population,




some microorganisms were quite resistant to Kepone (i.e., grew in its




presence).




     Twenty cultures, which grew in the presence of Kepone,  were  selected




(based on predominance) for further study.   The cell types and enzymatic ac-




tivities of these purified isolates showed  no significant correlation (a =




0.05)  with  Kepone sensitivity.

-------
     Because Kepone is known to be present in sediments and detritus in con-




centrations higher than that found in the water column (U.S.  Environ.




Protection Agency, 1975), we attempted to determine the toxicity of Kepone to




bacteria in sediments.  The results of viable plate counts on Zobell's marine




agar containing Kepone using samples taken from Range Point marsh sediment is




shown in Table 4.  Under aerobic conditions, CPU's decreased as a function of




increasing Kepone concentrations as expected from earlier results.   Under




anaerobic conditions, however, the inhibitory effect of Kepone was  reduced.




For example, at 0.2 mg Kepone/1, a slight reduction (0 - 12%) in CPU's




occurred under anaerobic conditions but a larger reduction (3^ - 80%) occurred




under anaerobic conditions.  Colonies originally grown aerobically, also




showed decreased Kepone sensitivity under anaerobic conditions.  Sediment




samples taken at different times generally showed different degrees of




inhibition at the various concentrations.




    The effect of Kepone on the anaerobic microbial populations in




contaminated James River sediment was different. These sediments contained 0.1




ppm Kepone (A.J. Ivilson, ERL-GB) when collected (8/29/77).  Results of viable




plate counts under aerobic and anaerobic conditions are presented in Table 4.




As opposed to Range Point sediment, the James River sediments contained




bacteria which did not show decreased sensitivity to Kepone under anaerobic




conditions.




Oxygen Uptake Studies




     To further assess the sensitivity of bacteria to Kepone, we conducted




oxygen uptake studies.  As seen in Table 5,  oxygen uptake was a sensitive




indicator of Kepone toxicity.   The isolates  showed varying degrees  of sen-




sitivity:  most cell suspensions (10^ - 10?  cells/ml) were inhibited at the  20




mg/1 concentration, whereas relatively little inhibition occurred at the 2

-------
mg/1 concentration.  Inhibition at 20 mg/1,  in many cases,  was substantially




greater than at the 200 mg/1 (see isolates 32, 43, and 56).  It should also be




noted that some isolates actually increased  oxygen uptake in the presence of




Kepone (isolate 49).




                                  DISCUSSION




     Our results indicate that Kepone is toxic to microorganisms.  Kepone




concentrations as low as 0.02 mg/1 reduced the number of colony forming units




on Zobell's marine agar by 23-92 °/oo.  This is ten to a hundred times more




toxic than the PCE's (bourquin 1975), chlordane (Trudgill et al. 1971) and




heptachlor (Shamiyeh and Johnson 1973).  Kepone levels in James River sediment




have been shov/n to be 0.05 - 0.5 mg/kg, particularly in areas of high organic




content (U.S. EPA, 1975).  Since Kepone is resistant to chemical and




biological degradation (Garnas et al. 1977)  and since Kepone appears to be




washing cut of the James River system at a very slow rate,  residual Kepone




could have an inhibitory effect on bacteria  in the river.




     However, this compound was not universally toxic to all cultures at the




concentrations tested.  Since only certain members of the bacterial




populations were inhibited by Kepone at concentration levels equal to those in




the James Hiver, it is important to know if  the tolerant species will replace




the sensitive species and thus maintain the  metabolic integrity of the




ecosystem.  In general,  this replacement process occurs in  both soil (Tu and




Miles 1976) and aquatic (ttare and Roan 1970) environments.   Unpublished




results from our laboratory, however,  have shown that Kepone,  at low




concentrations, decreases the rate at which  the pesticide methyl parathion is




degraded,  thus implicating a possible interference with the metabolic




integrity of an aquatic  system.

-------
     Of the three methods used to determine toxicity in this study (i.e.




sensitivity disc, plate counts and oxygen uptake),  each appear to yield




similar toxicity results.  Plate counts are the easiest method to assess  toxic




effects on a mixed population of bacteria, and the  minimum inhibitory




concentration (MIC = 0.02 mg/1) gives a good reflection of the effects




possibly occurring under natural conditions.  Little can be said about the MIC




from agar-disc diffusion experiments except that low concentrations of Kepone




are inhibitory.




     Much higher concentrations of Kepone would appear to be necessary to




inhibit oxygen uptake.  However, these studies employed high densities of




cells (1()6 - 10? cells/ml).  These levels are, in fact, proportional to an




enivornmental level.  Escambia Bay waters have a cell density of 103 - 10^




cells/ml.  Vie have determined, in plate assays, that the growth of this




population is inhibited at 20 vig/A Kepone.  By concentrating both factors




1000X, observe that 10^ - 10? cells will require 200 mg Kepone/1 to affect




inhibition, which are the same levels employed in oxygen uptake studies.




     The use of physiological characteristics (sugar fermentation, enzyme




activities, urea hydrolysis, hydrocarbon oxidation, etc.) as a possible tool




to determine the toxic effects on specific physiological processes has not




been used extensively (Brown et al 1975a).  Our study demonstrates no




significant correlation between these characteristics and Kepone toxicity.




Amylolytic activity was prevalent in some Kepone-sensitive organisms as was




the case for in PCB-sensitive bacteria (Bourquin and Cassidy 1975).   These




effects apparently cannot promote the enrichment of amylase-positive organisms




in a mixed population, because neither static nor flow-through systems exposed




to Kepone in our laboratory showed this type of enrichment.

-------
     The nontoxic effect of Kepone on bacteria grown anaerobically points to a




possible involvement with electron transport and respiration.   Widdus et al.




(1971) and Trudgill et al.  (1971)  have shown that the inhibition of KADK




oxidase activity in Bacillus subtilis by chlordane occurred indirectly through




the apparent disruption of  membrane-mediated electron transport.  Similar




mechanisms could account for the affect of Kepone in anaerobic versus aerobic




conditions.  Trudgill et al. (1971) did not study the effect of chlordane on




anaerobic growth, but he showed that a Streptococcus species (which would have




minimal cytochrome-mediated electron transport activity)  was unaffected by




chlordane.  Kepone, therefore,  could interfere with membrane-mediated




transport.




     A possible explanation for the increased oxygen consumption in the




presence of Kepone, is an oxygen uncoupling effect which  would generate




hydrogen peroxide.   Hydrogen peroxide would then be split by catalase,




releasing C>2 gas.  The mechanism accounting for the release of oxygen by cells




is still under investigation.

-------
Table 1.  Sensitivity of pure cultures  to  Kepone using the agar-disc diffusion method3

                                     Concentration Kepone (yg) per  disc
      GBERL	
     Isolate      Acetone
        #	Control	1.46	3.65	7.3	14.6

        1             0            0            4-4-4-       4- 4- 4- 4-          4-4-

        3             +            +            + 4-         + + +       -+ + H

        4             0            +            + + +       + + + +          + + H

        5             ±            ±            ±            ±                +

        8             ±            ±            ±            ±                +

       11             +            ++          + + +       + + +            + + 4

       14             0            0            +            ++              + + 4

       15             0            0            ++         + + +_.+ + 4

       29             0            +            ++         + + +            + +

       36             +            +            +            +                +

       42             +            +            +-++              + + 4

       47             0            0            +            +                +

       54            +         '   -^            4- +         4-4-              4- 4-


       aO = no zone; + =  0-1 mm;  4- = 1-2 mm; 4- 4- = 2-3 mm;  4- 4- 4- = 3-4 mm;
       4- 4- 4- 4- = > 4 mm.

-------
Table 2.  Physiological activities of cultures used in Kepone toxicity study_._
Culture
Number
I
3
4
5
11
Kepone ^4
^nsitive
29
42
47
54
8
36
15
10
18
20
23
40
(epone 45
nsensitive
46
56
59
2
7
27
44
Organism
Type
rod
rod
cocc-bac
cocc
cocc-bac
rod
rod
coccus
cocc
rod
yeast
yeast
fungus
rod
pleo
rod
rod
cocc-bac
rod
rod
cocc-bac
rod
yeast
yeast
fungus
fungus
Gram Alkanea Aromatic2 Physiological Function0
Stain Utilizer Utilizer Lipo Amylo Proteo
pos 4- + - + +
pos - - - 4 +
neg - -4-4-4-
neg - -4-4-4-
pos 4- 4-44--
pos - -44--
pos - - - - 4-
pos - - 4- - -
neg - -
pos - 4- - 4- 4-
4- + 4- -+
4- -4-4-4-
-4-4- N.D.C N.D. N.D.
neg - +
neg 4 - + - -
neg '4- - N.D.C N.D. N.D.
pos 4- 4- N.D. N.D. N.D.
pos 4- - 4- - 4-
neg - - 4- - 4-
neg - 4-
neg - - 4- 4- -
neg - -
1 4- 4-
4-4-4
- - 4- N.D. N.D. N.D.
- N.D. N.D. N.D.
Pesticide
Tolerance
+
-
-
-
+
•"•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
4-
+
-
-
-
+
+
  aHydrocarbons and pesticides listed in text
  bLipo = lipolytic activity;  Amylo = amylolytic activity; Proteo = proteolytic activi
  CN.D. = not determined

-------
Table 3.  Effects of Kepone on total viable counts of bacteria from estuarine wate
Sample
source Date3
Range
Point

Es cambia
Bay

Laboratory
Pond

Gulf of
Mexico


A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
D
Salinity
(°/oo)
15
15
20
11
15
18
20
15
20
33
33
33
Temp.
(C)
21
24
23
22
24
22
20
26
27
18
22
24

3-15
181
86
1
267
13
12
479
104
544
270
13
15
CPU's x 102
0.02b
108(41)
65(25)
12(28)
81(70)
7(50)
11(8)
448(7)
49(53)
501(8)
62(78)
10(21)
6(59)
ner ml water
0.20b
c 73(60)
35(60)
13(23)
233(13)
10(26)
9(23)
409(14)
437(20)
32(89)
10(25)
1(92)

2.00b
35(81)
33(61)
13(25)
130(52)
5(66)
9(23)
396(18)
19(82)
309(43)
46(83)
8(40)
1(95)
Sampling Dates.   A = 4/10/77;  B = 4/17/77;  C = 4/29/77;  D = 5/7/77.

 mg Kepone/c. used in Zobell's marine agar.

cNumbers in parentheses are percentage reduction in CPU's normalized against
 growth on control plates of Zobell's marine agar containing no Kepone.

-------
Table 4.  Typical Effects of Kepone on the production of colony forming units
          from Range Point narsh and James River sediments3
Sediment
Source
Range
Point

James
River

Incubation
conditions
anaerobic

aerobic
anaerobic

aerobic
Control
5-15
34

210
43

15200
CFU'
'0.02
41(0)C

200(5)
28(35)

16500(0)
2
s x 10 /gm sediment
Kepone (mg/£)
0.2
41(0)

140(34)
24(44)

14200(7)
2.0
37(0)

30(86)
9(79)

9400(36)
ajames River sediment contained 0.1 ppm Kepone

"CPU's are the mean of the results of triplicate platings.  Experimental error in
 these assays averaged + 8 CFU's

cNurabers in parentheses are percent reduction in CFU's relative to 2-15 control

-------
Table 5.  Effect of Kepone on oxygen uptake by resting cell suspensions of
          isolates from estuarine environments
Isolate
no.
49
51
61
56
32
35
43
Source0
EB
EB
EB
EB
RP
RP
RP
Kepone
Enrichment
Concentration
0.00
0.02
0.20
2.00
0.00
0.02
2.00
Percentage

2
+25
0
0
66
0
11
-
Reduction
Kepone (mg/
20
100
100
100
75
83
100
64
in 09 L'Dtake3
'£)°
200
100
100
100
66
31
100
33
  an>I 02/ml/min/yg protein or glucose

  "Kepone concentration required to show inhibition of concentrated cell suspension
   (10° - 10  cells/ml).   One thousandth of this concentration would inhibit 02
   uptake by bacterial populations in Escambia Bay (10  - 10  cells/ml)

  CEB = Escambia Bay, RP = Range Point

-------
                                LITERATURE CITED




Aaronson, S.  1970.  Experimental Microbial Ecology.   Academic Press.  New




     York.




Alexander, M.  1968.  Degradation of pesticides by soil bacteria.   In  Ecology




     of soil bacteria.  (Gray and Parkinson, eds.).  Univ.  of Toronto,




     Toronto.




Eourquin, A.W. and S. Cassidy.  1975.  Effect of polychlorinated biphenyl




     formations on the growth of estuarine bacteria.  Acpl.  Hicrobiol.   29:




     125-127.




Eourquin, A.W., L.A. Kiefer, N'.K. Eerner,  S. Crow, and D.G. Ahearn.   1975.




     Inhibition of estuarine microorganisms by polychlorinated biphenyls.




     Dev. Ind. Microbiol.  16:256-261.




Brown, L.R., E.G. Alley, and D.W. Cook, 1975a.  The effect  of mirex and carbo-




     furan on estuarine microorganisms.  Ecological Research Series, U.S.




     Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  Ohio.




Brown, L.R., G.W. Childers, and D.D. Vaishnav.  1975b.  Effect of Mirex and




     related compounds on estuarine microorganisms.  Dev. Ind.        \




     Microbiol.  16:267-266.




Carlson, D.A., K.D. Konyha, W.B. Wheeler,  G.P. Marshall,  and K.G.  Zaylskie,




     1976.  Mirex in the environment:  its degradation to Kepone and related




     compounds.  Science.  26:939-9^1.




Colwell, R.R. and W.J. Wiebe.  1970.  "Core" characteristics for use in




     classifying aerobic, heterotrophic bacteria by numerical taxonomy.




     Bull. Georgia Acad. Sci.  28:165-185.




Edwards, C.A., 1972.  Insecticides.   In Organic Chemicals In the Soil




     Environment (Goring and Kamake, eds.) Vol. 2, p.  513.   Marcel Dekker,




     New lork.

-------
Garnas, R.L., A.W. Eourquin and P.H. Pritchard.   1977.  The fate and degra-




     dation of 1^C-Kepone in estuarine microcosms.   In preparation.




Lowry, O.K., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L.  Farr,  and R.J. Randall.   1951.  Protein




     measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.   J.. Biol.  Chem.  J_9_3_: 265-275.




Richard, W.W.  1977.  Personal Communication.




Schimmel, S.C. and A.J. Wilson.  1977.  Acute toxicity of Kepone to four




     estuarine animals.  Chesapeake Sci.   16:224-226.




Stanier, R.Y., N.J. Palleroni, and M. Doudoroff.  1966.  The aerobic pseudo-




     monads - a taxonoinic study.  J.. Gen. Microbiol.  ^3: "159-271.




Trudgill, P.W., R. Widdus and J.S.  Rees.   1971.   Effects of organochlorine




     insecticides on bacterial growth,' respiration and viability.  J. Gen.




     Microbiol.  69:1.




Tu, C.M. and J.R.N. Miles, 1976.  Interaction between insecticides and soil




     microbes.  Residue Reviews.  64:17-66.




U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1975.  fact sheet on Kepone levels




     found in environmental samples from the Hopewell, Va.  area.  Health




     Effects Research Laboratory.   EPA.   Research Triangle Park, N.C.  Un-




     published, 15 p.




Walsh, G.E., K. Ainsworth, and A.J. Wilson.   1977.   Toxicity and uptake of




     Kepone in Marine Unicellular  Algae.   Chesapeake  Sci.   16:222-224.




bare, G.'w. and C.C. Roan, 1970. Interactions of pesticides with aquatic




     microorganisms.  Residue Reviews.  33:15.




hiddus, R., P.W.  Trudgill, and D.C. Turnell.  1971.  Effects of  technical




     chlordane on growth and energy metabolism of Streptococius  faecalis




     and Mvcobacterium phlei:  a comparison  with Bacillus  subtilis.  J.




     Gen, hicrobiol.  69:23-31.

-------
         Test  of Model  for Predicting Kepone Accumulation

                  in Selected Estuarine Species
                                1                     2
                Lowell H. Bahner  and Jerry L. Oglesby
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

                   Environmental Research Laboratory

                      Gulf Breeze, Florida  32561



                      2
                       University of West Florida


               Department of Mathematics and Statistics

                       Pensacola, Florida 32504
            In:  Proceedings of the ASTM Second Symposium on
            Aquatic Toxicology. October 31-November 1,
            Cleveland, Ohio. 1977.  (in press)
Gulf Breeze Contribution Number 356

-------
                              Abstract
    •\
   Extensive testing has shown that Kepone is rapidly accumulated by

estuarine animals when administered in water or food.  Flow-through

laboratory experiments with oysters, shrimp, crabs,  and fish indicate
         •
that food-chain transfer of Kepone is important in predicting Kepone

residues in estuarine organisms.  The rates of Kepone movement

through estuarine organisms were previously unknown;  rates of uptake

and depuration by these organisms were determined with a regression

model that describes mathematically the uptake and depuration of

Kepone by these organisms.  The model describes biological data as a

single equation, thus allowing variations due to many physical,

chemical, biological, and random error factors to be analyzed

simultaneously.

   The direct application of this model to cautious  extrapolation

will aid administrative decisions that affect water  quality.  The

rates calculated by this single-species model also can be used in

developing models that can predict the long-term fate of Kepone or

other pollutants in an estuarine environment.



Key Words:   Kepone, estuarine, food-chain, uptake (bioconcentration),

  model (mathematical).

-------
                            Introduction
    ^
  Kepone has been shown to accumulate and depurate from estuarine
animals at rates that vary with the species and the source of
contamination—water or food (Banner et al.  1977).  These
laboratory-derived results complement field surveys by  determining
whether water, food, or both contribute significant quantities of
Kepone to estuarine animals.  However,  variability in the  laboratory
and field survey data from the James River obscures trends and limits"
full utilization of these pesticide residue data.
   Several reports -are available that describe methods  of  analyzing
laboratory derived fish residue data using kinetic models  where
exposure concentrations in water are known and closely  regulated
(Blau and Meely 1975, Branson et al.  1975).   With minimal uptake
data, these kinetic models can accurately predict  equilibrium
residues in fish,  however, use of these models for invertebrate
residue data has yet to be demonstrated.
   In many instances, such as for field survey residue  data,  exposure
concentrations, length of exposure, temperature, pH, and salinity  are
not known accurately and often several  representative invertebrate
and vertebrate species are sampled or tested.   Field-exposed  animals

-------
 can depurate in a clean environment and time-series analyses of these
     \

 residues are valuable in determining how long biota will retain a



 chemical.  There is a need to analyze these field and laboratory



 uptake and depuration data, so that differences in exposure
          •


 concentration, differences due to species or size-,lass, or route of



 uptake can be statistically examined.  Therefore, a generalized



 mathematical equation was developed that:  1) describes the available



 data and delineates rates; 2) describes uptake from water data; 3)



 describes uptake from food data; 4) describes uptake singly; 5)



 describes depuration singly; 6) describes uptake and depuration



 simultaneously; 7) is expandable to multi-dimensions (describes



 uptake and depuration simultaneously by a species exposed to several



 concentrations, or describes uptake and depuration simultaneously by



 one or several species exposed to one or several pollutants);  and 8)



 is one equation.  This uptake/depuration equation can be incorporated



_J.nto a stochastic, dynamic estuarine ecosystem model to assess



 movement of Kepone in James River biota.

-------
                               Methods

   %



Model-Building Process


   Initial uptake of persistent chemicals by estuarine  animals  is

        »
normally rapid, but net accumulation diminishes until a constant


concentration is reached (Fig.  la).   On the other  hand, depuration  of


chemicals does not follow a consistent  pattern, and rate of loss is


dependent upon the nature of the chemical and the  test  species.


There is variability in most experimental data due to  fluctuation  in


physical, chemical, and biological factors such as temperature,


chemical concentration, animal size, molt cycle, and seasonal


spawning cycles.  Chemical concentrations in water and  food (the


variables most critical in determining uptake/depuration) are easily


controlled in the laboratory, however,  molting and spawning cycle


variations are difficult to control, and often are affected by a


pollutant's toxic properties. We developed a statistical model to


analyze mathematically the uptake of pollutant chemicals by estuarine


animals in laboratory or field exposures.  This method  of analysis


aids comparisons of laboratory with field data and permits use in


larger ecosystem models to predict movement of pollutants in


estuarine biota.

-------
   A nonlinear statistical model  was  designed  (Daniel  and Wood,  1971)
to describe the uptake and depuration of chemicals  because:   1)
transformations of the residue data failed  to  provide  an acceptable
model that was linear in the parameters,  and 2)  one equation  was
desired to describe simultaneously both uptake and  depuration since
these are not mutually exclusive  events.   Effects,  such as  sublethal
toxicity, should be distinguishable by statistically significant
changes in parameter values of this model.
     The linear equation, Y=a+bX, would describe uptake of  pollutants
if uptake were a linear relationship.  Y would be the  pollutant
residue at time = X, and a and b  would be the  intercept and slope
parameters to be calculated by the regression  analysis.  In a similar
manner, the pollutant residue, Y, and time,  DAY,  are used by  a
non-linear regression procedure to calculate parameters of  our
non-linear uptake/depuration equation.
__ The general form of our model  found to best fit residue  data  is:
(1)  Y = [ A + 1QC-C x DAY)j-1 _[F  + G x e(-D  x  (DAY - E))]-1f where
A, C, D, F, and G are parameters  estimated with  the natural logarithm
of pesticide residue, Y, found at time, DAY.   The effects of
parameters A and C are graphically illustrated (Fig. 1a).   Parameter
A has the value of the uptake curve.   The asymptotic residue

-------
concentration (in the animal  at  the  end of exposure), RESIDUE, is
determined by:
In(HESIDUE) = I/A   or     RESIDUE = e(1/A).
Parameter.D (Fig. 1b) determines the slope of depuration, where D^_0
indicates no depuration and CKLX.7 indicates  increasing rapidity of
depuration.  E is not estimated  from the  data but  is  fixed at DAY =
'beginning of depuration'.   In extreme cases,  parameters F and G are
required to modify the shape of the  curve so  the model will describe
the data with greater accuracy.   We  found that parameters F and G
usually can be replaced by  A and 10, respectively,  yielding the
model:
(2)  Y = [A + 10<-C * DAY)]-1 .  [A + 10 x e(-D x  (DAY - E))]'1.
Results of this equation are shown graphically to  indicate
applicability to depuration data of  different rates (Fig.  Ic, slow
depuration; Fig. Id, rapid  depuration).

-------
Figure 1.  (a)  Plot of generalized  uptake  equation.   Parameter A




(A=0.125) in this illustration denotes upper  asymptote;  parameter  A1




illustrates effect of increase in value of A  to  0.2.   Parameter C




determines initial uptake slope;  normally, C  varies  from 0.1  (slow)




to 2.0 (rapid).




   (b) Plot of  generalized depuration equation:  parameter D




determines loss slope and varies  from 0.1  (top),  0.5  (mid),  to 0.65




(lower);  parameter E denotes onset  of depuration.




   (c) Plot of  generalized equation,  indicating  slow  depuration.




   (d) Plot of  generalized equation,  indicating  rapid depuration.

-------
   lOOOOr
2
<
UJ
oc
                     •f " A— '•
                      Asymptote
                     -/— *—
0      14      28
 	UPTAKE—H
        42


TIME (days)
                                   56
   IOOOO
       0
       14      28    42      56

     UPTAKE—H	DEPURATION -
                  TIME (days)
IOOOO


 1000
                                                   -    100
                                                   a
                                                         10
            14      28     42     56
                   |—DEPURATION

                 TIME (days)
lOOOOr
                                                   I  1000
                                                   UJ

                                                   Q
                                                   05
                                                   UJ
                                                   o:
            14
                                                     28     42     56

                                                    -I — DEPURATION	^
                 TIME (days)

-------
   Both models (1) and (2), are nonlinear in the parameters and

require an iterative method to estimate those parameters.  The method

of numerical analysis developed by Marquardt (1953) was chosen

primarily because of its wicie acceptance and general use.  A typical

program dataset (exclusive of job control),  using the S.A.S. liLIiJ1

procedure, follows:
   DATA KEPOHE;  INPUT SPECIES $ COI.'C TISSUE $  RESIDUE DAY;
   IF RESIDUE EQ 0 THEN Y = 0;
   IF RESIDUE UE 0 THEN Y = LOG (1000*RESIDUE);
   CARDS;
                       0.00   0
                       0.50   7
                       0.86  15
                       0.99  30
                       0.87  37
                       0.57  44
                       0.38  54
                       0.000  0
                       0.038  7
                       0.072  9
                       O.OS8 14
                       0.120 21
                       0.037 28
                       0.100 30
                       0.100 35
                       0.084 42
                       0.035 49
                       0.023 56
   PROC SORT; BY SPECIES CONC TISSUE;
   PROC PHIirf;  BY SPECIES COUC TISSUE;
   PROC iJLIU BEST = 05 ITER = 200 METHOD = MARQUARDT; BY SPECIES CONC
   TISSUE;
   FARMS A  = 0.1 TO 0.3 by 0.1
        C  = 0.1 TO 0.7 by 0.2
        D  = -.1 TO 0.3 by 0.2;
   0 = (A+(10**(-C*DAY))); E = 28;
   R = (A+10**EXP(-D*(DAY-E)));
   MODEL Y  = Q**(-1) - K**(-1);
   DER.A =  -Q**(-2)) + R**(-1);
   DLH.C =  (Q**(-2))*(10**(-C*DAY))*DAY*LGG(10);
SPOT
SPOT
SPOT
SPOT
SPOT
SPOT
SPOT
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
SHRIMP
.4 FILLET
. 4 FILLET
.4 FILLET
.4 FILLET
. 4 FILLET
.4 FILLET
.4 FILLET
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE
.023 WHOLE

-------
   LO.D =  -10*(DAY-E)*EXP(-D*(DAY-E))*R**(-2);
    WEIGHT   = DAY;
^Statistical Analysis System,  SAS Institute Inc.,  Raleigh,  li.C.
 Mention of coriirnercial products does not necessarily constitute
 endorsement by the U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency.

-------
                        Results and Discussion
     %






   Our uptake/depuration statistical models (Equations 1  and 2)  were



validated using raw data from uptake and depuration of



di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate by fathead minnows (Pi::iphales pronielas)



(Dranson, Blau, and Mayer 1977).  Nine sample periods were



represented with four replicate single-fish samples for the seven



concentrations tested.  The parameter estimates for each



concentration tested were generated from the five-parameter (Equation



1) and three-parameter (Equation 2) model equations; standard linear



lack-of-fit tests were applied using the calculated parameters and no



lack-of-fit was evident (Table 1).  Dioconcentration factors (ECF),



the concentration in animal at chemical equilibrium * concentration



in exposure water, were calculated using our statistical models.  The



BCFs from our models and the Dow Chemical DIOFAC model (Elau et al.



1975) are listed for comparison.



   Dioconcentration factors and bioaccumulation factors (3AF,



concentration in animal at chemical equilibrium ^ concentration in



exposure food) are shown for six species of estuarine animals exposed



to Keporie in water, food, or both (Table 1).  Uptake-only and



depuration-only data were analyzed using the appropriate portions of

-------
Table 1.  Parameter estimates for five-parameter model3 or three-parameter model  that  describe  uptake and
          depuration of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate by fathead minnows and uptake and  depuration of  Kepone  for
          six species of estuarine animals exposed to Kepone in water, food, or both.
Exposure Route of
Species Concentration Uptake
(ug/£ or yg/kg)
fathead3
minnow
"
"
"
"
It
"b
oyster^
oyster3
mysidsc
n
grass shrimpb
n

1.9 fresh water
2.5
4.6
8.2
14.0
30.0
62.0
.03 sea water
.39
.026 sea water
.41
.023 sea water
.40
" Lafayette R. unknown
blue crab"
"
"
n
n
sheepshead
minnows
spot'3
M
.03 sea water
.3
250.0 food
250.03 food + water
250.30 "

.05 sea water
.029 sea water
.40
, A

0.141
0.133
0.124
0.125
0.120
0.114
0.110
0.184
0.122
0.197
0.118
0.212
0.124
0.155
no
"
0.211
0.217
0.202

0.177
0.216
0.144
C

1.392
1.455
1.416
1.763
1.741
1.699
- 1.680
1.099
5.136'
.293
.465
.183
.220
1.
detectable
n
.136
2.624
.123

.354
.168
.304
Parameters
D E

.702
.202
.261
.238
.688 t
.703 .
.074
.621
.303
-
—
.0980
.0994
.0827
up cake
"
-.0571
-.125
-.0324

-.0561
.0923
.0850

56
56
56
56
56
56
56
28
28
-
—
28
28
—


28
28
28

28
30
30
Model
F G BCFd
or
BAF

.751 76. 820 f 630
.504 6.153 ' 733
.564 11.911 680
.674 11.079 371
.773 165.856 304
.752 73.976 220
141
7641
.194 1.083 9305
6160
11686
4862
7949
— — —


.457
.401
.564

5684
3534
2593
Q
Biof ac
BCF

774
915
838
467
364
252
204
















aY = 1/((A-HO**(-C*DAY)) -  (F + G*EXP(-D*(DAY-E)))); five  parameter  model.
bY = 1/C(A+10**(<-C*DAY)) - t(A+10*EXP(-D* (DA.Y-E)))) J  three  parameter  mod.cl.
CY = 1  (A+10**(-C*DAY)); uptake only.
 ,                               (I/A)
dBCF=Moconcentration Factor = e
(cone,  in water); BAF = Bioaccumulation Factor =  e   ''I  (cone,  in food)
                    M-ii
                           1Q77

-------
the three-parameter model (Table 1).   The three-parameter model



(Equation 2) was also used to describe the laboratory depuration of



Kepone from grass shrimp collected in the Lafayette River,  near



Norfolk, Virginia.  Application of this model to depuration-only data



gave excellent results, indicating that data from field-exposed



animals can be used to derive all parameter estimates except C, the



uptake rate parameter; C was arbitrarily set to 1.0 for these data (C



should be chosen so that 10^~c*DAY)is 10.00001).



   Parameter estimates for uptake and depuration of Kepone in six



species of estuarine animals were calculated with our five-parameter



(Equation 1) and three-parameter (Equation 2) statistical models



(Table 1).  The three-parameter model (Equation 2) sufficiently



described (by graphical analysis) all uptake from water data except



that for oysters exposed to 0.39 yg Kepone/i.  In this instance, the



five-parameter (Equation 1) model was necessary for generation of



adequate parameter value estimates.  The three-parameter model was



also sufficient to describe the uptake and retention of Kepone in



blue crabs that were fed 0.25 yg Kepone/g, regardless of whether 0.03



or 0.3 yg Kepone/£ seawater were also administered to the crabs.



Graphs of the computed models and data for several of the species



tested are shown (Figs. 2-6).

-------
     Fig.  2.  Model representation of bioconcentration of Kepone from water containing average measured




concentrations of 0.03 or 0.39 ug/fc by oysters (Crassostrea virginica) exposed for 28 days, and its




depuration by oysters placed in Kepone-free water for 28 days.   Parameter estimates for oysters exposed




to 0.39 pg/JZ. were: A=0.122, C=5.136,  D=.303,  F=.194,  and G=1.083.  For oysters exposed to 0.03 Mg/%




A=0.184, C=1.099, and D=.621.   Lower limit of analytical detection was 10 yg/g.

-------
CP
c
C/)
cr
UJ
I-
co
>
o
UJ
z:
o
Q.
UJ
     lOOOOr
1000
 100
          0
                14

            -UPTAKE
28
   42          56

DEPURATION	
                            TIME (days)

-------
     Fig. 3.  Model representation of bioconcentration of Kepone from water containing average measured




concentrations of 0.026 or 0.41 yg/£by mysids (Mysidopsis bahia) exposed for 21 days.  Parameter estimates




for mysids exposed to 0.026 pg/£ were: A = 0.197 and C = .293.   For mysids exposed to 0.41 yg/JL, A = 0.118




and C = .465.  Lower limit of analytical detection was 20 ng/g.

-------
en
c


C/)
O
2


LJ


O
Q.
UJ
    10000
     1000
      100
       10
       0
                                14

                          UPTAKE-
                                            21
                                TIME (days)
28

-------
     Fig. 4.  Model representation of bioconcentration of Kepone from water containing average measured




concentrations of 0.023 or 0.40 ug/£ by grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) exposed for 28 days, and its




depuration by shrimp placed in Kepone-free water for 28 days.  Intermediate curve represents depuration




of Kepone from grass shrimp collected in the Lafayette River, Norfolk, Virginia, and held in Kepone-free




seawater at the ERL, Gulf Breeze,  for 21 days.   Parameter estimates for shrimp exposed to 0.023 ^Jg/2. were:




A=0.212, C=.183, and D=.098.  For  shrimp exposed to 0.40 yg/Jl, A=0.124, C=.22, and D=.099.  For Lafayette




River shrimp, A=0.155 and D=0.083.   Lower limit of analytical detection was 20 ng/g.

-------
O»
v.
o>
c
I
CO

en


o:
    10000
o
0.
UJ
     1000
       100
        10
        0
         0
   14

UPTAKE-
                                 o
                                   v
                                   \
                                       A— -
                                    Lafayette  River
                                        \
                                        0.023 pg/l
 28          42

H	DEPURATION
                           TIME (days)
                                                       56

-------
     Fig. 5.  Model representation of bioaccumulation of Kepone from food and water by blue crabs




(Callinectes sapidus) exposed for 28 days followed by 28 days of consuming food and water containing




no Kepone.  Parameter estimates for crabs exposed to 250 ng/g were:  A=0.211, C=.136, and D=-.057.  For




crabs exposed to 250 ng/g plus 0.3 ug/£>  A=0.202, C=.123,  and D=-.032.   Lower limit of analytical detection




was 10 nc/a.

-------
    lOOOOr
o>

en
c
(/)
CD
<
o:
o

UJ
ID

CO
UJ
2
o
Q.
UJ
1000-
 100-
0
   14

UPTAKE
                                          42
                                                 56
                           TIME (days)

-------
     Fig. 6.  llodel representation of bioconcentration of Kepone from water containing average measured




concentrations of 0.029 or 0.4 }ig/l by spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) exposed for 30 days, and its depuration




by fish placed in Kepone-free water for 24 days.  Parameter estimates for spot exposed to 0.029 yg/£ were:




A=0.216, C=.168, and D=0.092.  For spot exposed to 0.4 yg/£, A=0.144, C=.304, and D=.085.  Lower  limit




of analytical detection was 20 ng/g.

-------
"5 loooo
o>
c
1-
CL 1000

y
o
X
^ IOO
^* \ \J \J
z
LL)
1 10
LJ


_
(



•— • J
/
/
/
/
/ C
/ /^°
.//
f /
I /
* / i
'/ »
»
3 14 28
i ir>TA istr -*»


0.4 ^g/l
k _ ^P /

^"^•^.^^^



^ n

0.029 ^g/l 0<^^^




42 56
	 r\r"ni ir»A-ri/^M 	 w
TIME (days)

-------
Extrapolation from Model
    %
   Assuming the parameter values generated sufficiently  describe the

uata, extrapolations to the time required for grass shrimp or spot to

depurate 90* of their Kepone burden can be made.   3y applying the
         •
parameter values (Table 1) to the three-parameter model,  39 or 35

days are required for grass shrimp exposed to 0.023 or 0.4 vg/£,

respectively, to depurate 90* of their Kepone burden and 43 days for

grass shrimp collected from the Lafayette River.   Spot would require

41 or 42 days to depurate 90£ of their Kepone residues if previously

exposed to 0.029 or 0.4 pg Kepone/&, respectively.
                 «r •""
   Extrapolation was not necessary for the oyster data,  since

non-detectable concentrations were reached.  Insufficient data exist

to determine the time needed for sheepshead minnows to depurate to

nondetectable concentrations.  Data and the model demonstrate that

Kepone was not depurated from blue crabs.

-------
                             Conclusions
    ^






   The stochastic uptake/depuration model  sufficiently  described



uptake and depuration of Kepone by estuarine oysters, shrimp,  crabs,
          •


and fiiih, regardless of whether the pesticide was in water or  in



food.  In addition,  the model described depuration-only data,  so  that



field-exposed animals could be utilized to project depuration  rates



and to allow estimation of the time required for residues to reduce



to non-detectable concentrations.   The ultimate residue concentration



in exposed animals is predicted to depurate to zero concentration,  if
                  ** •*"


parameter D of the three-parameter model  is greater than zero  and



given that time is sufficient.  The exponential depuration portion  of



the model gives an accurate fit to data regardless of depuration



rate, and given sufficient data, extrapolations can be  made



cautiously.  All parameters in the model  have confidence intervals;



therefore statistical inferences (statistical significance) can be



judged with joint confidence region comparisons.  For example, the



model can be used to determine if pesticide residues from laboratory



exposures are statistically different than those from field



exposures.

-------
   If expanded,  the present single-species,  single-concentration
   \
model should produce multidimensional models that describe

cheraical-species-dose-time interactions.   Expansion of the number  of

parameters in the model will be limited by the number of replicated
        »
data points that are available.  Because  thorough, replicated

sampling schemes testing multiple concentrations are not, possible  for

all pollutants,  attempts should be made to categorize parameter

estimates for chemicals, species, and exposure concentrations.

Successful categorization of the model parameters would allow  use  of

generalized parameter estimates in dynamic ecosystem models.

-------
    ^                         References








[1]   Banner,  L.H.,  Wilson,  A.J.,  Jr., Sheppard,  J.M.,  Patrick,  J.H.,



        Jc.,  Goodman, L.R.,  and Walsh, G.E., Chesapeake Sci.,




        Vol.  18,  1977,  pp.  299-308.



[2]   Blau,  G.E.  and Neely,  W.B.,  Adv. Ecological Research,



        Vol.  9,  Academic  Press,  1975, pp.  133-163.



[3]   Branson,  D.R., Blau, G.E., Alexander, H.C.,  and  Neely, V.'.B.,



        Trans.  Arn.  Fish.  Soc.,  1975, pp. 785-792.



[4]   Daniel,  C.,  and Wood,  F.S.,  Fitting Equations  to Data,



        John  Wiley  and  Sons, New  York,  1971, pp.  5-115.



[5J   Marquardt,  D.W., J_.  Soc.  Indust. ApjxL. Math.,



        Vol.  11,  1963,  pp.  ^31-441.



[6]   Branson,  D.R., Blau, G.E., and Mayer, F.L.,  "Bioconcentration



        kinetics of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate  in fat  head minnows,"



—      Environmental Contamination by Industrial Organic Chemicals



        Symposium.   Assoc.  of Official Anal. Chemist  1977 national



        Meeting.  Washington,  D.C. Oct., 1977.



     Blau,  G.E.,  Neely, W.B.,  and Branson, D.R.,  AIChE Journal,



        Vol.  21,  1975,  pp.  854-861.

-------
  The Fate of  ^C-Kepone in Estuarine Microcosms



*R. L. Garnas, A. W. Bourquin and P. H. Pritchard




      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency




         Environmental Research Laboratory



           Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561






   Presented  at 175th National Meeting of the




  American Chemical Society, Anaheim, California




  March  16, 1976 - Pesticide Chemistry, paper 59-

-------
     Kepone was developed by the Allied Chemical Corporation in the early


1950's and was manufactured in Hopewell,  Virginia intermittently until 1974.


In 1973 Allied Chemical subcontracted the .production of Kepone to Life Science


Products Company, which operated from a building located adjacent to Allied


Chemical's plant on the James River,  which empties into Chesapeake Bay.


     Their plant on the James River operated 24 hours a day, seven days a


week, and manufactured 3,000 to 6,000 pounds of Kepone per day.  Over 90$ of
              »

the 1.7 million pounds of Kepone produced by Life Science during its 16 months


of active operation was exported to Latin America, Europe, and Africa for
                                                                           »

control of insect pests.  The effluents from the plant were hooked directly to


Hopewell's sewage treatment plant.  Kepone in the effluents disrupted the  .


normal biological treatment process and put the plant out of operation.  Later


investigations revealed that sediment from adjacent Bailey's Creek and waste


water from the sewage treatment and landfill areas contained Kepone at levels

                                                  /
between 0.1 and  10 ppm.  Sludge samples taken from the holding pond and from


the landfill near the Hopewell sewage treatment plant contained 200-600 ppm of


Kepone.


     In August 1975 the Life Science plant was closed.  EPA collected


monitoring data showing widespread dissemination of Kepone in the James River


system.  Kepone in the water was detected at levels between 0.1 and 4 ppb;


residues in fish and shellfish were between 0.1 and 20 ppm.  The Food and Drug


Administration set the allowable limit of Kepone in fish and shellfish


consumed as food at 0.1 ppm.  The James River was closed to fishing in


December 1975.


     In October  1976, Allied Chemical Corporation was fined $13.2 million for


its role in polluting the James River with Kepone.  Life Science Products


Company itself was fined $3-8 million.  It is now estimated by the scientists

-------
constituting the Kepone Task Force that approximately 200,000 pounds  of Kepone



have been disseminated into the James River system.



SLIDE ONE:  Conceptual Fate of Kepone



     Following the contamination of the James River  system with Kepone, the



Environmental Research Laboratory at Gulf Breeze responded with necessary data



about the toxicity of Kepone to estuarine organisms  and its potential for



bioaccumulation. and biomagnification.  Serious questions arose concerning the



fate of Kepone in the river.  The fate of a pollutant is closely related to



its toxicity; forces such as volatilization, sorption, metabolism,  and abiotic
                                                                          •


transformation (photolysis, hydrolysis, chelation) affect the availability and



toxicology of pollutants to aquatic species.  A knowledge of the sites of •



Kepone concentration and rates of exchange associated with these sites is



necessary for long term regulatory actions.  Sorption and transformation data



are needed to determine whether the ecosystem can remove the pollutant by



degradation or eventual washout, or whether physical assistance from  dredging



or damming is necessary.



     The conceptual fate of Kepone shown in this slide was developed  and



modeled by the Gulf Breeze Laboratory through a research project with



Manhattan College.  The projection of time required  to reduce the levels of



Kepone by various natural processes such as adsorption-desorption and trans-



formation are included as an important phase of the  project.  Unfortunately,



insufficient data are available for Kepone.



     A variety of laboratory microcosms have been developed to supply fate



information for this modeling effort.  The following presentation is  a brief



summary of the research effort we conducted with Kepone in these systems.

-------
SLIDE TWO:  Kepone

     Kepone is an extremely stable member of the cyclodiene insecticides,  with

a molecular structure similar to Mirex.  However, due to the presence of an

oxygen atom in the molecule, Kepone is more water-soluble through hydrogen

bonding than Mirex.  Within a pH range of 4-6, the solubility of Kepone ranges

from 1.5 to 2.0 ppm.  An increase of pH to 9-10 increases the solubility to

5-70 ppm.  Although Kepone has a molecular configuration similar to Mirex, it
              *
should not be assumed to behave like Mirex in the environment.

SLIDE THREE:  Static Fate System
                                                                           •
     This system consisted of a 125 ml Erlenmeyer flask fitted with a stopper.

A capillary glass inlet allowed introduction of air or nitrogen; the gas exit

was fitted to a disposable Pasteur pipette filled with XAD-4 resin (Rohm and

Haas, Philadelphia, Pa.) to trap volatile compounds.  The small size of the

system allowed maximum replication and examination of different environmental

substrates and processes.  Similar systems were sampled sequentially with time

to indicate rates of transport and transformation.  ^C-Kepone was used to

minimize  involved analysis and to facilitate simulation of environmental

levels.   The environmental parameters  tested in this study were sediment type,

salinity, aerobicity, pH, temperature, sunlight concentrations,

volatilization, and biological forces.

     Standard experimental conditions  included  10 gm (wet weight) of sediment;

100 ml of Santa Rosa Sound water  (18-24  ppth);  constant temperature of 25°C;

12/12 hr. diurnal lighting  (G.E. Vita  Gro); water saturated air  (Silent

Giant);  19.9 yg  1l
-------
SLIDE FOUR:  l4C-Kepone Distribution in Static Fate System


     In the standard analytical procedure, the system was fractionated into


water suspendable particulate, and unsuspendable sediment (i.e.,  sand) by


repeated rinsing of the system with equivalent salinity water; James River


sediments were all suspendable (very little sand).  Following centrifugation


(3000 RPM), an aliquot of the water was examined for radioactivity by


scintillation counting.  The sediment fractions were extracted repeatedly with
               *

acetonitrile (Pe), with aliquots taken for scintillation.  Following the


addition of 2% sodium sulfate water to the acetonitrile extracts  (^1:1
                                                                           •

water/solvent), the aqueous fractions were extracted with 1:1 petroleum


ether/diethyl ether and analyzed by thin layer chromatography (3:1 diethyl  .


ether/n-hexane; Quanta Gram LQGDF, Quanta Industries, Fairfield,  New Jersey)


and autoradiography (Birchover Radiochromatogram Spark Chamber,  Hitchin,


England).  Periodically, the extracts were cleaned on florisil columns (2 gm,


hexane washed; 20 ml rinse of 5% diethyl ether/hexa-^e; final elution with 50


ml of 1/t methanol/benzene) and analyzed for Kepone, octachloro-Kepone, and


nonachloro-Kepone (standards provided -by A. J. Wilson, EPA, Gulf  Breeze,


Florida) by electron capture gas chromatography (Hewlett-Packard  GC Model


5830A; Ni63detector; Model 1&850A GC terminal; 2 mm id x 2 m glass, 2% OV-101


on Gas Chrom Q, 100/120).  Extracted sediments (Pc) were dried and combusted


at 900° (Harvey Instrument OX-200 Combustion System, Hillsdale,  New Jersey) to


liberate and trap residual radioactivity as ^CC^.


     The experimental results revealed that within one to two days, approxi-


mately 75 to 80$ of the total radioactivity added to the system was found


associated with the sediment.  Most of this radioactivity (Pe) was adsorbed"to


the suspendable particulate material.  Kepone, which could not be extracted


from this material by organic solvent (Pc), constituted approximately 2 to 6%

-------
of the total radioactivity.  Very little Kepone was associated with the

heavier sand material in the sediment.  Virtually no Kepone volatilized out of

the flasks (R) (no radioactivity in resin traps).  The remainder of the

radioactivity, that is 15 to 20% of the Kepone initially added, remained in'

the water column (W).  In most experiments,  total recovery of the

radioactivity from the flask was between 90  and 95J.  No evidence for the

production of degradation products at any time was seen.  Long-term incu-
               •
bations did not change this basic distribution of Kepone in the flask.  When

similar systems were sterilized with 2% formaldehyde or forced to become
                                                                           •
anaerobic by bubbling with nitrogen gas, a similar distribution of Kepone was

apparent.  Similarly, changing salinities, exposure to sunlight, varying

concentrations of Kepone, and differing temperatures, all showed very little

effect on this basic Kepone distribution pattern.  Under all of these

conditions, no evidence (total recovery of radioactivity as Kepone) was

obtained for degradation of the pollutant.

     In further tests with these screening systems, a sediment washing step

was included to determine the desorption capability of Kepone from particulate

material.  This procedure consisted of washing Kepone-containing sediment
                                                                           •

three times with clean seawater.  The washed sediments were then placed in a

flask, covered with a column of fresh seawater, and incubated for three days.

At the end of this incubation, the amount of radioactive Kepone in the water

column was determined.  This procedure was followed on test systems for the

final three week sampling period.  Typically, 9 to  11? of the radioactivity in

the sediment desorbed into the water column in the  first week wash.  Another M

to 8? of the radioactivity in sediment leached into the water column during.

each of the second and third week periods.  Overall, 20 to 40? of the total

radioactivity in the sediment was desorbed.

-------
     From these experiments,  we  conclude  the  following:

     A.   Kepone has a propensity for adsorption  to  and  desorption  from

         sediment.   Most of the  Kepone  in the sediment  was associated with the

         lighter suspendable particular matter and  not  with  heavier  sand

         particulate.

     B.   Kepone does not volatilize out of an aquatic ecosystem  and  there was

         no transformation or degradation of  the Kepone.
              *
     C.   The distribution of the Kepone between  the water and  the  sediment


         (i.e., the Kp value), was not  altered by changing environmental
                                                                          •
         conditions such as aerobicity, temperature, Kepone  concentrations,

         sunlight,  and salinity.

SLIDE FIVE:  Adsorption Isotherms for Kepone  in  Sediments

     Adsorption isotherms are shown on  this graph for various  environmental

and reference substrates.  The adsorption data for  all  systems fitted linear

isotherms over a broad range of  water phase concentrations.  The Kp's of

Kepone show an increase with increasing organic  carbon  content from  quartz

sand (O.C. r 0.01$) to Range Point salt marsh detritus  (O.C. = 25%). Quality

of organic carbon,  as well as quantity, influenced  the  Kp of Kepone. Ground

seagrass (Thalassia), which was  aged for  several weeks  in raw  flowing

seawater, displayed an organic carbon content of 60?.   The Kp  for  Kepone with

this substrate was  lower than that for  sediment  from a  local salt  marsh with

lower organic carbon content (O.C. = 25%). The  presence of  animal detrital

matter in the saltmarsh sediment could  account for  this anomaly.

     Field samples  from the James River System (open and closed  symbols)

showed the same correlation with organic  content of the sediments.  With

sediments of lower  organic content, insufficient Kepone was  present  in  the

water to determine  Kp values.

-------
SLIDE SIX:  Schematic of Continuous Flow System

     Continuous-flow microcosm studies allow the dynamic nture of an ecosystem

to be investigated in the laboratory.  They provide information on the rate

and extent to which a pollutant will a) move into the various compartments-of

an aquatic ecosystem and b) be transformed by biological and nonbiological

forces.

     The system consists of a reactor vessel containing the substrates and .
              •
biota of interest.  Raw seawater can be fed continuously to the system.  The

aeration apparatus samples exiting air for volatile organics and ^CCt2~
                                                                           •
     To follow the fate of pollutants resulting from the biological activity

of aquatic macro biota, two continuous flow systems were structured with 9 em

of Range Point sediment and 24 liters of Santa Rosa Sound water.  The systems

were allowed to acclimate statically with aeration for 48 hrs.  Twelve

lugworms (Arenicoj.a cristata) were added to one of the tanks and flow was
                                                   /
started through both systems (D = 0.04 hr'"1); after four days, the water flow

was stopped and each system was spiked with 1 mg (1 x 10^ dpm) of ^C-Kepone

in 0.5 ml acetone.  After two days the water flow was again started.  Aliquots

of water (3 ml) were sampled directly for radioactivity until background

levels were obtained.  At that point larger sample volumes of water were

required for detection of radioactivity.  Thereafter, the radioactivity was

concentrated on two beds of XAD-4 resin (75 ml wet volume in 250 ml separatory

funnel).  Following removal from a system, the resin was extracted with

methanol in a Soxhlet extractor overnight and analyzed directly for

radioactivity.

-------
SLIDE SEVEN:  Desorption Kinetics for Continuous Flow Systems



     The resin was efficient in the removal of 1i4C-Kepone from raw seawater



(99/t); the Soxhlet extraction procedure removed all radioactivity from the



resin throughout these studies (95% recovery).



     The graph shows the washout of radioactivity,  plotted as a function of



the radioactivity remaining in the sediment at any time.  By Day 5 all of the



lugworms were dead, with fungal mats forming over the tissues.  One lugworm
              •


was removed from the system and found to contain high levels of radioactivity



in its tissues (3% of total spike to system); all of the radioactivity was

                                                                           •

Kepone.  At these levels of accumulation, the lugworms added to the system



contained a large fraction of the original fortification (3$ x 12 = 36%).  The



other dead lugworms were left in the system, where they eventually decayed and



completely decomposed.  Desorption followed simple first-order kinetics and.



gave a desorption rate of .002 hr~1 (that is, .002 of the original Kepone in


                                                  s

the sediment desorbed per hour).  This desorption rate was a reflection of the



diffusion of Kepone off the sediment material and was, therefore, independent



of flow rate.  Numerous water samples were checked for the presence of



particulate matter containing adsorbed radioactive Kepone.  In all instance^,



of the radioactivity in the water, only 5 to 7% was associated with this



particulate material and, therefore, washout was not a function sediment



scouring.  Thus, the radioactivity in the water was a true reflection of the



dissolved Kepone present.



     Since desorption of Kepone is probably a simple diffusion process, its



ultimate distribution within the James River system will depend on the



hydrodynamics of the river itself.  However, ingestion of Kepone by a bentMc



organism could decrease the rate of desorption due to an additional



sequestering compartment.  These experiments indicate that the presence of •

-------
polychaete worms in the sediments of the flow-through systems increased the


amount of Kepone adsorbed into the sediments relative to worm-free control


systems.  This was presumably due to a bioaccumulation.   In this particular


experiment, Kepone was toxic to the polychaete worms and their eventual death


and decomposition also resulted in a slower release of Kepone from the system.


The slower rate of desorption is presumedly not due to increased amounts of


organic material from the worm (not greater than 0.01^ of the natural organic
              *

matter present), but is more likely a different form of sequestered Kepone


that was desorbed slower.  These data indicate that desorption of Kepone from
                                                                           •

sediment was a function of the quality of organic matter present and not the


quantity.  For additional sorption studies ^C Kepone-containing water (0.1.


ppm) was continuously passed over a sediment bed at a dilution rate = 0.01


hr~1.


SLIDE EIGHT:  Conclusions for Kepone Transport.


     The adsorption capacity was large and would probably not reach saturation


levels within reasonable time limits.  The amount of Kepone adsorbed to the


sediments in these experiments was a function of the rate at which the water


passed over the sediment.  Kepone adsorbed to the top 2-3 cm of sediment in,


these studies and little diffusion down the sediment column was observed.  The


removal of Kepone from inflowing water (60% at 0.01 hr~1) was constant with


time over 600 hours of flow.  If the flow to the reactor vessel was stopped,


preventing additional Kepone from entering the system, the residual Kepone  .in


the water continued to be adsorbed rapidly into the sediment.


SLIDE NINE:  Schematic of Intact Core System


     The final system used to study the fate of Kepone in the James River  •


estuary was a series of microcosms referred to as Eco-cores.  These systems


consist of glass tubes (30 mm in diameter and 38 cm long) which can be

-------
inserted into the water and into the underlying sediment layer to extract an


intact core.  These cores are then stoppered into the glass column,  brought


back to the laboratory, and tested for their biodegradation capacity.   In the


case of the James River, direct coring was not possible and thus sediment and


water samples collected from the James River were mechanically placed  in the


glass columns to simulate a cored sample.  In addition to the James  River


sediment studies, simultaneous cores were taken from a local salt-marsh near
              •

Pensacola Beach and studied in a similar manner.  The advantage of these


Eco-cores, besides their potential for looking at processes in intact  core

                                                                          •
samples, is that they allow a large number of environmental parameters to be


tested on a particular degradation process taking place within the cores.


These degradation processes were monitored as follows:  Once the core  has been


taken and brought back to the laboratory, the glass column was outfitted with


an aeration device and the water in the core spiked with radioactive Kepone at

                                                  /
a concentration of 500 ppb.  The aeration of the water column disperses and


mixes the Kepone and ensures contact with the sediment.  These cores were then


incubated at 25°C.  Degradation was measured two ways:  (a) Exiting  gas from


the cores was bubbled through alkaline solutions to trap radioactive carbon


dioxide released from the radioactive Kepone; (b) Samples were taken from the


water column and analyzed (by the same basic procedures used in the  static


system) to obtain the amount of Kepone remaining at any time and the presence


and amount of any degradation products formed.  After sufficient periods of


incubation (i.e., diminished activity), the distribution of radioactivity in


the cores was analyzed.  Vilater and sediment were removed from the core and


each component extracted and analyzed for the presence of radioactivity and


the presence of any degradation products from the Kepone.

-------
SLIDE TEN:  Kepone Degradation .Studies

SLIDE ELEVEN:  Data from Coring  System

     A variety of conditions were varied in all of the systems described to

observe the effect on the degradation of Kepone.  Extremes in salinity,

temperature and light did not alter Kepone.  Analysis by GLC showed no

detectable dechlorinated products of Kepone in any of the systems examined.

     Since some chlorinated hydrocarbons are known to undergo dechlorination
               »
reactions under anaerobic conditions, cores were set up under a variety  of

environmental conditions.  For example, cores were made anaerobic by bubbling
                                                                            •
with nitrogen gas; cores were made anaerobic and supplemented with glucose and

other organic materials; and cores were maintained aerobically and

supplemented with organic substrates which might stimulate the microbial

degradation of Kepone.  In all cases no evidence for Kepone degradation  was

obtained.  In the analysis of several cores maintained under anaerobic

conditions, thin layer chromatography revealed extraneous radioactive products

which chromatographed separately from Kepone.

SLIDE TWELVE:  Kepone Analysis

     With anaerobic conditions in Eco-core experiments, thin layer auto-

radiography analysis revealed two radioactive spots, one of which was Kepone.

Radioactive profiles obtained with high pressure liquid chromatography also

showed similar radioactive distribution.  When rechromatographed on TLC  or

HPLC the unknown radioactive spot migrated with the same Rf.  In contrast,

extracts of exposed lugworms displayed two radioactive areas; however, when

rechromatographed, the unknown spot migrated at the Rf of Kepone.  An isolate

from estuarine sediments (corynebacteriurn-like) previously grown on minimal •

media and camphor as the sole carbon source, also displayed the unknown

product.  Mild acid treatment of the unknown would cause it to chromatograph-

-------
like Kepone.  The unknown spot failed to elicit a response on GLC-ECD at the


Rt of Kepone and did not chromatograph favorably under most conditions.   At


this time the material obtained from the anaerobic sediment/water systems and


the pure culture study are being examined in greater detail by GCMS and


selective detectors.


CONCLUSIONS


     At this time, we believe that Kepone does not degrade in our experi-
               •

mental systems.  The reversible quality of the unknown back to Kepone causes


us to suspect that a strong association is occurring from the presence of the
                                                                           •

oxygen atom in the molecule with other chemicals in the extracts and not


degradation.  Kepone did not volatilize from any of the systems described.


     Kepone displayed a dynamic movement potential in sediment/water systems.


The rate of this movement was related to the organic content of the sediment


and to the quality of the organic fraction.

                                                   /

     These systems were used to indicate the major environmental components


affecting the fate of Kepone.  Extrapolation of these data to the James  River


system is hampered by severe scaling problems.  However,  these studies do


validate current field monitoring practices and offer direction for future


field work to supplement the existing data base for mathematical modeling.

-------
      A BENTHIC BIOASSAY USING TIfC-LAPSE PHOTOGRAPHY

TO MEASURE THE EFFECT OF TOXICANTS ON THE FEEDING BEHAVIOR

           OF LUGWORMS (POLYCHAETA:ARENICOLIDAE)
                   Norman I. Rubinstein
                    Faculty of Biology
              The University of West Florida
                    Pensacola, Florida
IN:   Symposium on Pollution and Physiology of Marine Organisms
(Eds) W.S.  and J.F.  Vernberg.  Academic Press. 1977. (in press)

-------
                                   ABSTRACT

     A benthic bioassay was developed utilizing time-lapse photography to •
measure the feeding activity of a lugworm, Arem'cola cristata.   Automated 35 mm
cameras were used to record formation of feeding funnels at 12-hour intervals.
Substrate surface area reworked by lugworms held under identical conditions in
separate aquaria was plotted against time to" determine substrate reworking rates
for each group.  Rates were subjected to linear regression analysis and compared
to demonstrate that no significant difference between the slopes of the calculated
lines existed.  Therefore, a difference in slope when one group is. exposed to a
toxicant could provide a measure of effect on lugworm activity.  To demonstrate
the applicability of this approach, lugworms were exposed to the pesticide,
Kepone, and their rate of substrate reworking was compared with non-dosed lugworms.
Kepone was acutely toxic to lugworms at a concentration of 29.5 yg/£.   A
significant difference in substrate reworking rates was observed following exposure
to concentrations as low as 2.8 yg/£ Kepone in seawater.   It is suggested that a
behavioral response to toxicity testing provides a sensitive and realistic
approach for evaluation of ecological  impact of pollutants on the marine environ-
ment.

-------
                                INTRODUCTION

     Federal legislation (i.e. the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries
Act of 1972) requires that permits for the discharge of materials into coastal
waters be evaluated on the basis of their ecological impact on the marine
environment.  Under this legislative mandate the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has been delegated the responsibility to establish guidelines for
conducting bioassays used to define the types and amounts of materials that
may be released into the marine environment.  The bioassay, therefore, serves
as a regulatory tool used by federal agencies and private industry to assess
the ecological impact of pollutants on the marine environment.
     Bioassay procedures recommended by EPA (1976) for conducting-toxicity
evaluations utilize a variety of sensitive epibenthic and pelagic species but
do not include representative infaunal organisms.  This is due, in part, to the
relative lack of sensitivity displayed by many infatmal species and the difficulty
in observing biological effects while organisms are buried in sediment.  However,
many macrofaunal invertebrates are deposit feeders that have a great effect on
the benthic community as a result of their substrate reworking activity.  These
organisms have been shown to in/luence benthic community trophic structure and
sediment stability (Rhoads and Young 1971).   In addition, sediment processing
organisms provide a pathway for cycling organic material, nutrients and pollutants
between the sediment and the water column (Rhoads 1973, Meyers 1977).   Therefore,
meaningful  evaluations of the impact of a pollutant on the marine environment
must include information regarding effects on representative members of the
infaunal  community.  The objective of this study was to develop a sensitive and
practical method that could be used to assess biological effects of pollutants
on estuarine and marine infaunal  organisms.

-------
     Various benthic organisms including holothurians, crustaceans, pelecypods
and polychaetes, produce distinct, characteristic topographical  features on the
substrate surface as a result of their normal  activity (i.e.  feeding, burrowing
and excretion).  These features in some cases  may serve as in situ indicators of
the organisms'  activity (Rowe et_ aj_.  1974).   With the aid of time-lapse photography,
surface features can be monitored and analyzed statistically to  determine the
relative effects of xenobiotics on organisms selected for study.
     The benthic bioassay described here utilizes time-lapse photography to
measure the formation of feeding funnels produced by the lugworm, Arenicola
cristata Stimpson.  Comparisons of rates of feeding funnel formation between
exposed and control lugworms serve as the test criterion.

Ecological Significance
     Lugworms are sedentate polychaetes distributed throughout the world in
most littoral habitats.  Their activities, which are^omewhat analogous to
those of the earthworm, are responsible for bioturbations of the sediment to
depths as great as 50 cm.   Populations of the  european species,  Arenicola marina,
have been observed to turn over nearly 500 tons of sand (dry weight) per acre
per year (Blegvad 1914).
     Lugworms form u-shaped burrows in a variety of substrates ranging from
silt and mud to coarse gravel and mud.  Arenicola cristata normally builds its
burrows in muddy sand (partical size  200-700 ym) at depths of 20-25 cm and in
densities as great as 20 per square meter (D'Asaro 1976).  The burrow consists
of a tail shaft, a horizontal gallery and a  head shaft.  Periodically, the
lugworm moves forward in the gallery  and ingests sand along with associated
organic material (living and dead).  The resulting displacement  of the overlying
sediment produces a subsiding column  of sand marked by a funnel  shaped depression
on the substrate surface.   When the organic  content in the region of the head

-------
shaft is depleted, A_. cristata forms new feeding funnels in adjacent areas.
Figure 1 illustrates the progressive formation of feeding funnels produced by
one lugworm at 12 hour intervals.
     Feeding and the consequent formation of feeding funnels is an integral
part of an activity sequence which also incorporates excretion and peristaltic
pumping of water through the burrow for respiration and ventilation.  These
combined activities comprise the "Normal Cyclical Pattern" which is believed to
be controlled by internal pacemakers and is therefore independent of normal
environmental variables (Wells 1966).  A decrease in the formation of feeding
funnels would indicate an interruption in this activity cycle.
     As the lugworm feeds and pumps water through its burrow, it mixes organic
material and oxygenated water into the substrate (especially in the vicinity of
the head shaft).  This process is undoubtedly beneficial to other infaunal
organisms living in association with the lugworm, for it provides them additional
sources of food and oxygen.  However, during periods" of environmental perturba-
tion, contaminating agents are also transported into the substrate.  Garnas et al.
(1977) demonstrated that lugworm activity affected movement of the pesticide
methyl parathion from the water column into the sediment.  The fate of such
compounds as they interact with infaunal organisms raises questions of great
complexity.  The role of the lugworm in this regard is not yet fully understood.
However, the lugworm has been observed to suspend substrate modifying activity
when environmental  stress reaches a threshold level (Rubinstein 1976).  This
type of behavioral  response to environmental contaminants could serve as a
sensitive indicator for various polluting agents.
Feeding Activity of Unstressed Lugworms
     To insure that comparisons between exposed and non-exposed lugworms could
be made, I  conducted preliminary tests to determine if lugworms of similar size

-------
rework the substrate at equivalent rates when subjected to the same conditions.
Due to a limitation in available time-lapse photography equipment, only two
groups of lugworms could be compared at a given time.
Bioassay Procedure
     Two 125 £ aquaria were used as test habitats.  Both aquaria contained
0.25 m2 of sand (particle size 200-700 urn) to a depth of 25 cm and 72 i of 20 ytn
filtered seawater.  All tests were conducted at salinities between 20 and 23 °/oo
and temperatures between 22 and 25°C.  Water was aerated by airstones except
when automatically turned off prior to taking photographs.
     Lugworms were obtained from stocks cultured at the University of  West
Florida Marine Laboratory, Sabine Island, Pensacola, Florida by the method of
D'Asaro. (1976).  Six worms 8.5 to 9.5 cm long (measured fully contracted) were
placed in each aquarium and allowed 48 hours to establish burrows and acclimate
to test conditions.  Following acclimation, 50 grams^of ground seagrass (pre-
dominantly JJiaJj!_as_i_a_ tes_tud_i_num) was added to both aquaria.  The seagrass formed
a dark mat on the sediment surface and served as the detrital component of the
benthic system.  It was used as food by lugworms and also provided photographic
contrast against the white underlying sand when turned under by feeding animals.
     A 35-mm single lens reflex camera was positioned above each aquarium
(Figure 2).   The cameras were equipped with an automatic advance mechanism,
24-hour timers and an automatic lighting system consisting of four strobes and
two floodlights.  Photographs of the substrate surface were taken at 12-hour
intervals  for 72 hours and then analyzed to determine the surface area disturbed
by feeding lugworms.   Surface area was calculated by using a system of point
counting in  a coherent grid modified from Hyatt (1973).   The outline of feeding
funnels was  traced onto a 0.25 cm grid overlay, all  points on the 5 mm intersections

-------
                                                          2
were counted and then converted to actual surface area (cm ).  Total surface
area turned under by feeding lugworms was plotted against time to determine the
substrate reworking rate of lugworms in both aquaria.  Rates were subjected to
linear regression analysis and the slopes of the calculated lines were compared;
differences due to treatment were considered significant at » = 0.01.
     Six replicate tests were conducted with a different group of lugworms for
each test.  Results are shown in Figure 3.  Variability in the magnitude of
surface area disturbed between tests can be attributed to slight variations in
size, age and condition of lugworms.  For this reason comparisons of substrate
reworking rates were made within a test and not between separate tests.  Rates
of feeding funnel formation were not significantly different (t[97.5; 8]) between
aquaria within each of the six tests.  Therefore, the use of two aquaria, one
experimental and one control is valid because the rates of substrate reworking
between lugworms of similar size and condition are comparable.
                                                 •  /
Appl i cation _pf_ Feedijig^Acti vi ty To Toxicvty Testing                     -  " -
     Following preliminary tests using no toxicant the sensitivity of lugworm
feeding activity was tested with the insecticide Kepone (dodecachlorooctahydro-1,
3, 4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta [cd] pentalene).  Kepone was selected because of the
extreme hazard it poses to aquatic life in the James River Estuary and Chesapeake
Bay (Hansen e_t aj_.  1977), areas in which the lugworm is endemic.  Although the
acute toxicity of Kepone to several  estuarine fishes and invertebrates has been
investigated (Hansen e_^ a]_. 1977, Schimmel and Wilson 1977, Nimmo e_t aj_. 1977)
the sub-lethal  effects of this compound on infaunal  organisms have not been
evaluated.

-------
                                   METHODS

     A series of six tests using diminishing concentrations of Kepone was
conducted using the bioassay procedure previously described.   A stock solution
of Kepone (88% pure) in nanograde acetone was dispersed in the water of one
aquarium; the second aquarium received an equivalent amount of the acetone
carrier and served as the control.  Aquaria were dosed following lugworm
acclimation and approximately one hour after the ground seagrass was added.
From this point on photographs of the substrate surface were taken at 12-hour
intervals for 144 hours.  Measured concentrations of Kepone tested were 29.5,
7.4, 6.6, 4.5 and 2.8 vg/£.  A non-detectable level  (<0.02 yg/&) was also tested.
One liter water samples taken from aquaria one hour after introduction of the
test compound were analyzed by gas chromatography as in the method of Schimmel
and Wilson (1977).

                           RESULTS AND DISCUSSION   *

     Kepone was acutely toxic to lugworms at the highest concentration tested.
All lugworms exposed to 29.5 yg/£ died while no mortalities occurred at the
lower concentrations during the 144 hour period.  Significant inhibition of
lugworm feeding activity in both magnitude and rate was observed at all detectable
levels of Kepone tested (F >^ 91, d.f. 2, 10; » = 0.01).  Comparisons of substrate
reworking rates between exposed and control lugworms for selected tests are
shown in Figure 4.
     Lugworms were sensitive to Kepone at sub-lethal levels as low as 2.8 yg/£ .
During the first 48 hours of exposure to concentrations ranging from 7.4 to 2.8
yg/£ exposed and control lugworms displayed similar rates of feeding funnel
formation.  However, between 60 and 144 hours a significant reduction in the
amount of surface area disturbed by exposed lugworms was observed.  This latent
effect suggests that lugworms may gradually accumulate Kepone until a threshold

-------
level is reached which then interrupts the "Normal  Cyclical Pattern."



     The relative toxicity of Kepone to several  estuarine species has been



determined (Schimmel and Wilson 1977, Nimmo e_t al_.  1977).  The species examined,



and their 96-hour LC50 values were:  grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio), 121_ ug/r,



blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), 210 ug/&; mysid (Mysidopsis bahia), 10.1  yg/£;



sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus), 69.5 yg/£; and the spot (Leiostomas



xanthurus), 6.6 yg/£.  Although the 96-hour LC50 value for the lugworm was not



determined, complete mortality was observed within  48 hours at 29.5 ug/£.  Based



on these findings it is apparent that the lugworm is sensitive to Kepone when



compared with other estuarine species.





General Conclusions



     I have presented a bioassay system for quantifying the effects of a pollutant



on a marine infaunal polychaete.  The toxicity tests conducted with Kepone serve



to illustrate applicability of the bioassay technique".  At sublethal concentrations



(7.4 to 2.8 yg/£) the Normal Cyclical Pattern of the lugworm was interrupted,



resulting in a decrease in substrate reworking activity.  Although the consequences



of reduced lugworm activity are speculative at this time, it is possible that a



suspension of substrate reworking by the lugworm and other infaunal organisms



with similar deposit feeding habits could reduce the exchange of pollutants



between the sediment and water column thereby prolonging the residence time of



a pollutant in the water.   Long term effects of reduced lugworm feeding activity



could eventually result in the depaupuration of lugworm populations.  Such an



event would affect the overall transport of nutrients and pollutants through the



benthic system as well as  alter food chains of which the lugworm forms a part.



     Whatever the environmental significance of this deviation from normal



activity caused by pollutant stress, it is clear that this technique can



demonstrate a behavioral  effect on an important infaunal organism.  Such a

-------
test which demonstrates biologi-cal effects of low levels of pollutants on an
important ecological  process such as sediment reworking will be of value in
determining the potential impact of a contaminant on the marine environment.
                               ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
     This study was supported by an EPA grant (R804458) to the University of
West Florida.  I would like to thank Dr. C. N. D'Asaro (University of West
Florida) for giving me the opportunity to carry out his original suggestions,
Dr. N. R. Cooley and Mr.  D. J. Hansen (EPA) for editorial comments and Mr.
Lowell Banner (EPA) for help with the statistical analysis.  Facilities to
complete the research were made available by Dr. T. Duke of the Gulf Breeze
Environmental Research Laboratory.

-------
Figure 1.   Feeding funnels  produced by one  lugworm at  12-hour intervals,

-------

-------
Figure 2.   Photo-Bioassay  System  (A-24-hour  timer,  B-35 mm camera with automatic
           advance,  D,  E aquaria  with  25  cm  of  sand and 75 i of  seawater).
                                                   X

-------

-------
Figure 3.   Comparison  of the rates  of sediment  turned  under  by  groups  of  "lugworms
           of similar  size.   A different  group  of  lugworms was  used  for the  six
           replicate tests.                          S

-------
* » '%

-------
Figure 4.   Comparison  of the rates  of sediment  turned  under by  lugworms.   C:
           control;  E:   experimental  group  exposed  to  Kepone.   Each  group
           consisted of six  lugworms.            •   /

-------
           SURFACE  AREA  DISTURBED  (cm^)


o
ro
o
o
^
0
o
en
0
o
CD
o
0
                                 ro
                                 o
                                 o
          o
          o
-CD
o
o
CO
o
o
                      en
                      en

                      t
                      (O
                      CD
                      •o
                      o
                      3
                      CD
                            CD
ro
                            CD
                            en
                  CD
                  O

                  Q*
                  o;

                  CD
m
o
c
-T
CO

-------
                              LITERATURE CITED

Blegvad, H.  1914.   Food and conditions of nourishment among the communities  of
     invertebrate animals found on or in the sea bottom in Danish waters.   Rep.
     Danish Biol. Sta.   22:41-78.
D'Asaro, C.N.  1976.   Lugworm aquaculture Part I.   A preliminary plan for a
     commercial bait-worm hatchery to produce the lugworm Arenicola cristata
     Stimpson.   Report  16; State University System of Florida.   A Sea Grant
     College Progarm.
EPA.  1976.  Bioassay  Procedure for the ocean Disposal Permit Program.   U.S.
     Environmental  Research Laboratory Office 'of Research and Development,
     Gulf Breeze, Florida.
Garnas, R.L., C.N.  D'Asaro, N.I. Rubinstein and R.A. Dime.  1977.  The fate of
     methyl parathion  in a marine  benthic microcosm.  Paper #44 in Pesticide
     Chemistry  Division, 173rd ACS meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 20-25,
     1977.                                                             .   ~ .-
Hansen, D.J., A.J.  Wilson, D.R. Nimmo, S.C. Schimmel, L.H. Banner and R.  Huggett.
     1976.  Kepone: Hazard to aquatic organisms.   Science.  193:528.
Hyatt, M.H.  1973.   Principles and techniques of electron microscopy.  Vol. 3.
     van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., New York, pp 239-289.
Meyers, A.C.  1977. Sediment processing in a marine subtidal sandy bottom
     community:  I  Physical aspects; II Biological  consequences.  J.  Mar.  Res.
     35(3):609-647.
Nimmo, D.R., L.H. Banner, R.A. Rigby, J.M. Sheppard and A.J. Wilson.   1977.
     Mysidopsis bahia  - An estuarine species suitable for life-cycle toxicity
     tests to determine the effects of a pollutant.  Aquatic Toxicology and
     Hazard Evaluation, ASTM STP 634, F.L. Mayer and J.L. Hamelink Eds.  ppl09-116.

-------
Rhoads, D.C.  1973.  The influence of deposit-feeding benthos on water turbidi
     and nutrient recycling.   Am.  J.  of Sci.   273:1-22.
Rhoads, D.C. and O.K. Young.   1971.  Animal  sediment relations in Cape Cod Bay,
     Massachusettes.  II.   Reworking  by Molpadia oolitica (Holothuroidea).'
     Marine Biology 11:225-261.
Rowe, G.T., G. Keller, H.  Staresinic  and N.  Macllvaine.   1974.  Time lapse
     photography of the biological reworking  of sediments in Hudson Bay submarin
     canyon.  J. Sed. Patrol.   2:549-552.
Rubinstein, N.I.  1976.  Thermal  and  haline  optima and lethal limits affecting
     the culture of Arenicola  cristata (Polychaeta:   Arenicolidae).   Masters
     Thesis, University of West Florida.
Schimmel, S.C. and A.J. Wilson,  Jr.  1977.   Acute toxicity of Kepone to four
     estuarine animals.  Cheasp.  Sci.   18(2)224-227.
Wells,  G.P.  1966.   The lugworm (Arenicola)  a study  in adaptation.   Ne'th.  J.
     Sea Res.   3:294-313.

-------
          •n
    Kepone :   Toxicity and Bioaccumulation in Blue Crabs
       Steven C. Schimmel, James M. Patrick, Jr.,

Linda F. Faas, Jerry L. Oglesby, and Alfred J. Wilson, Jr.
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

              Environmental Research Laboratory

                 Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
                    Estuaries (In Press)

-------
^Registered Trademark for decachlorooctahydro-1,3, 3-metheno-



2H-Cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2 one.  Allied Chemical Company,
   %


JJO Rector Street, New York, New York.  Mention of commercial



products does not constitute endorsement by the Environmental



Protection Agency.



^Contribution No. 3^9, Environmental Research Laboratory,



Gulf Breeze.

-------
                           ABSTRACT






   Two long-term studies were conducted to determine toxicity,




uptake and depuration of Kepone in blue crabs (Callinoctes




sapidus). In the first, Kepone was administered to crabs in




seawater -(0.03  or 0.3 yg Kepone/£) or food (eastern oyster,




CrassQstrea virgjLnica, containing 0.25 ug/g Kopono).  Uptake  of




Kepone in 28 days was primarily through the contaminated




oysters.  When these crabs were held in Kepone-free seawater




and fed Kepone-free oysters for 28 days, no loss of the




insecticide was evident.  There were adverse effects on molting




and survival in cj?abs fed oysters that contained 0.25 ug/g




Kepone,




   A second study was conducted to determine•/(1) the




depuration of Kepone over a 90-day period in blue crabs fed




oysters from the James River, Virginia (containing 0.15 yg/g




Kepone); and (2) the effects of Kepone on molting and survival




of blue crabs fed James River oysters or laboratory-




contaminated oysters that contained 0.15 or 1.9 ug/g Kepone.




Crabs fed Kepone-contaminated oysters followed by a diet of




Kepone-free oysters for 90 days had detectable concentrations

-------
of the insecticide in tissues.   Also,  blue crabs  that  ate




oysters containing Kepone in concentrations similar to those




found in oysters from the James River, died or molted  less




frequently than crabs fed Kepone-free oyster meats.

-------
                         INTRODUCTION



  Contamination of Virginia's James River  estuary  by  Kepone  in




the late 1960's and early 1970's,  and  its  transport into




Chesapeake Bay, raised questions about the chemical's



persistence in and effects on the area's estuarine biota.




Kepone residues in James River biota,  in particular blue  crabs




(Callinectes sapidus Rathbun), bluefish (Pomatomus salatrix




Linnaeus)1 and eastern oysters (Crassostrea vireinica Gmelin).




were found by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration  (FDA)  to be




sufficiently high to limit the commercial  harvesting  of these




and other species -captured in the estuary.



   Kepone residues in James River blue crabs coincided with  a




decrease in commercial crab landings.   Residues in males  was




0.81 ug/g; in females, 0.19 yg/g (Bender  et al., 1977).  Total



blue crab catch from the James River indicated a 90£  decline




from 1972 through  1975 (U.S. Dept. Commerce, 1968-1975).



   Laboratory exposures of blue crabs in  seawater to  Kepone



indicated relatively low acute toxicity and bioconcentration



(Schimmel and Wilson, 1977).  This, in contrast to James River

-------
residue data, suggested that the major route of Kepone  entry in


crabs may be through contaminated food.
   >

   In this paper, wo report the results of two long-term


studies to determine: (1) uptake and depuration rates of Kepone


in blue crabs exposed to the insecticide in seawater and food
        •

(eastern oysters); and (2) effects of Kcpono in food on molting



and survival of blue crabs.


   The authors thank Mr. Steve Foss for the illustrations,  Kr.


Johnnie Knight for chemical analyses on water samples,  and Mr.


Monte Tredway for help in bioassays.  V*e also thank the staff


of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, particularly Mr.
                •*t "

Robert Huggett, for collecting James River oysters and Mr.


Chuck Taylor of the Environmental Protection Xgency's (EPA)


Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia for analyses


of heavy metals in oyster tissues..

-------
                        METHODS AND 'MATERIALS

     animals

   Blue crabs for both studies were collected from Santa Rosa Sound,

Florida; oysters, used as food for blue crabs, were collected either

from Santa Rosa Sound (local oysters)  or from Wreck Shoals in the

James River estuary, Virginia.  Eastern oysters were appropriate

food in these bioaccumulation studies because: (1) oysters

bioconcentrate Kepone under laboratory conditions (Banner et al.,

1977);  (2) oysters contaminated with Kepone have been reported from

the James River (Bender et al., 1977); and (3) oysters are a natural

food of blue crabs_ (Anonymous, 19*11;  Loosanoff, 19**8; Lunz, 19^7;

Menzel and Hopkins,  1956; and Menzel and Hichy, 1958).
                                             /
Approximately 95£ of the crabs collected were Callinectes sapidus:

the remaining, .C. simills (Williams).  No effort was made to

separate the latter species because of the limited numbers of

animals available and the need to avoid excessive handling.  Locally

collected oysters (Santa Rosa Sound) and blue crabs contained no

Kepone  detectable by gas chroraatographic analysis.  Blue crabs were

acclimated to laboratory conditions for at least  14 days prior to

testing.

-------
Study No. 1

   Approximately ^150 juvenile blue crabs (19-^9 ram carapace width,

= 36.7 mm) were collected from Santa Rosa Sound, in July 1976.

During acclimation, crabs were fed meats of eastern oysters from

Santa Rosa Sound ad, libitum.

   A 56-day bioconcentration (uptake directly from the exposure

water) and bioaccumulation  (uptake primarily from ingested food)

study was conducted, using  the diluter described by Schimmel et al.

(1977).  Seawater was pumped from Santa Rosa Sound through a sand

filter and into a reservoir in the laboratory.  It was then heated

to a mean temperat-ure of 22.1°C (range, 20.0 to 23.5°C); salinity

was allowed to vary with sound conditions (range 20.0 to 31.0 °/oo;
                                            S
x = 25.5 °/oo).  From the reservoir, seawater was pumped to the

diluter mixing box by LambdaR pumps.  The diluter provided two

Kepone concentrations in seawter  (0.03yg/£ and 0.3 u/?/£ » nominal
 ^Registered Trademark, Harvard Apparatus, Co., Inc.  150 Dover Road,

 Millis, Massachusetts 0205M.

-------
concentrations), each concentration duplicated, as well as seawater

fres of Kepone, also duplicated.  Six exposure aquaria measured ^6

cm x 71 cm x 26 cm (volume = 86&), and the diluter delivered one

liter  to each aquarium each cycle.  There was an average of 300

cycles each day (10 turnover volumes).  Fifty-six blue crabs were

placed simply in individual compartments (b.5 cm x ^.7 cm x 10.0 en)

in each aquarium.  At least 12 holes  (6 mm diameter) were drilled in

each compartment to provide adeuqate  circulation.

   The 5b-day study was divided into  a 2B-day uptake period and a

2o-day depuration period.  In the uptake period, Kepone was

administered to tfre crabs; (1) in the water delivered to the

experimental aquaria; and  (2) in contaminatedyeastern oysters as a

food source.  Adult oysters were contaminated by exposing them to

0,1 yg/il Kepone for 42 hours; afterwards oyster meats were removed

from their shells, pooled, and analyzed quantitatively for Kepone

content.  Approximately 0.5 g of the  oysters, contaminated with 0.25

vg/g Kepone, were fed to the crabs twice each week in a control

aquarium, and to crabs exposed either to the 0.03 y?/£ or 0.3 yg/£  .

Approximately 0.5 g of uncontaminated, Santa Rosa Sound oysters (<
                                                                    1
0.02 ug/g Kepone) were fed to crabs in the remaining control and

experimental aquaria (Table 1).  Two  crabs were sampled from each

-------
aquarium during the uptake portion of the test at 1  day,  2 days,

                                                                    <

and, after the second day, twice each week to the end of the 28-day  .
   >

exposure period.  Identical sampling intervals were  used for the



28-day depuration portion of the study.  When sampled, each crab  was



dissected into muscle and remaining tissues including exoskeleton.
        •


Muscle tissue was obtained from the thoracic region  and contained



small amounts of chitin.  Remaining tissues consisted of whole crab



not included in the muscle tissue sample.  Molting and mortality  of



crabs were monitored daily throughout the study.



Study No. 2



   Approximately 580 juvenile blue crabs (9 to ^2 mm carapace width,-



x = 28 mm) and approximately 1000 adult eastern oysters were



collected from Santa Rosa Sound in February and March^1977.        -



   Uncontaminated local oysters, the control food, were removed from



their shells, cut into 0.5 g portions, and frozen.



   Two hundred local, Uncontaminated oysters were placed in an



aquarium and exposed to 1.0 pg/£ Kepone for 20 hours to obtain an



average of 1.9 Vg/g Kepone in their tissues.  Another 200 oysters



were exposed to 0.1 yg/Jl  to obtain an average of 0.15 yg/g Kepone.



Oysters from each aquarium were then cut into 0.5 g pieces and      '



frozen.

-------
    Additional eastern oysters were collected in the James River

 (near  Wreck  Shoals) in March  1977 by the staff of the Virginia
    \
 Institute  of Marine Sciences and shipped by air freight to the Gulf

 Breeze Environmental Research Laboratory.  Gas chroraatographic

 analysis of  pooled oysters  showed a Kepone concentration of 0.15
         •
yg/g wet weight.   These oysters  wore also cut into 0.5 p piocos and

 frozen.
                                                                     4
    Study No. 2  with blue crabs  was conducted to determine:  (1) the

 effects of Kepone on molting  and survival; and  (2)  the rate of

 depuration of Kepone beyond the 28-day  period tested  in Study No.  1.

 The same exposure apparatus used in Study  No.  1 was used except  that

 no Kepone  was administered  in seawater.  Six aquaria  were  used,  each

 containing 68 blue crabs (held  in  individual'compartments  as in  the

 previous study).  Crabs  in  aquaria Nos.  1  and  4 were  used  to
 determine  uptake and  depuration of Kepone  administered through their

 food;  those in aquaria  Nos. 2,  3,  5,  and 6 were observed for effects^
 on molting or survival  (Table 2).  Crabs in  aquarium  No.  1  were  fed
 0.5 g of Kepone-free  oysters  twice each week.   Crabs  were  sampled
 twice each week for 28  days,  three per  sample,  for  Kepone  residue

 analyses;  thereafter,  crabs were  sampled less  frequently  for an     *
 additional 90 days.   Crabs  were dissected into muscle and remaining

  tissues,  as in  the first study.

-------
Chemical methods

  Methods of chemical analyses of Kepone were those of Schimmel and '

Wilson (1977).  The average recovery rate of Kepone from fortified

tissue was 87$;  from water, 85$.  Residue concentrations were

calculated on a  wet-weight basis without correction for percentage

recovery.  All samples were fortified with an internal standard

(dichlorobenzophenone) prior to analysis to evaluate the integrity

of the results.

Statistical methods

   Blue crab molting data were analyzed by one-way analysis of

variance followed._by the Student-Newman-Keuis post hoc tests to

determine significant differences (ct= 0.05); mortality data were
                                            /
analyzed by Student's t (a= 0.05).
                                10

-------
                               RESULTS
Stufiy No. 1
   Blue crabs fed oysters contaminated with 0.25 pg/g Kepone
accumulated the insecticide readily in their muscle and remaining
tissues in 28 days.  However,  after 28 days in a Kepone-free
environment, no depuration of the compound was evident (Fig. 1).
When fed 0.25 pg/g Kepone in oysters for four weeks, crabs
accumulated the insecticide to an average of approximately 0.1  pg/g
in both their muscle and remaining tissues.  Uptake of Kepone by
crabs fed contaminated oysters only (aquarium No.l) was nearly
identical to that"of crabs fed contaminated oysters and provided
Kepone in seawater (aquaria Nos. 3 and M), indicating that very
little of the insecticide was taken in directly from water.  No .  -
measurable concentrations of Kepone were detected in crabs from
aquaria supplied with 0.3 pg/£ (0.08 pg/£ measured) or 0.03 yg/£
(0.01^jjg/£ measured) Kepone (aquaria Nos. 5 and 2 respectively).
   Blue crabs in all aquaria were monitored for molting and
mortality throughout the 56-day test.  Although no statistical tests
could be applied to these data, we observed that crabs fed control
                                                                    t
oysters molted a total of 63 times, and 22 crabs died  (Table 3).
Crabs fed Kepone-contaminated oysters for 28 days, and control
                                 11

-------
oysters  for 28 additional days, had fewer molts (n=48) and more




deaths  (n=^9) than crabs fed only control oysters. The data



indicated  that Kepone in crab  food may reduce their ability to molt




or survive.  Therefore, we conducted Study No. 2 to investigate this



possibility and  to determine the depuration rate of Kepone in crabs •




over a  longer period than in the previous study.




Study No.  2



    Blue crabs in aquarium No.  4 that were fed James River oysters




 (containing 0.15 yg/g Kepone)  accumulated the insecticide in muscle




and whole-body tissues  (muscle and remaining tissues) to a maximum




 of 0.069 pg/g in.2-8  days  (Fig. 2).  After a Kepone-free diet for 90



 days, crabs showed  some loss of the insecticide.   However, 0.025




yg/g Kepone was detected in remaining tissues, and  approximately  -




 0.01^ pg/g remained  in  muscle  tissues.   Some of this  apparent loss



 of Kepone  must be attributed to growth of the blue crabs.  No length



 or weight  measurements  were made at the  end of the 28-day exposure



 period, and consequently  the exact growth could not be determined.



    Molting by crabs  fed James  River oysters  (aquarium No. 3, Kepone




 concentration  =  0.15pg/g), oysters containing Q.15ug/g Kepone



 (aquarium  No.  5), or 1.9  Mg/g  Kepone (aquarium No. 6) was



 significantly  reduced  (ct = 0.05) compared with those fed control
                                   12

-------
oysters (aquarium No. 1, Fig.  3).  The average molts per crab in 56


days were: control, 1.4; 1.9 yg/g Kepone,  0.56; 0.15 yg/p Kepone,
    ^
0.97; and James River oysters, 0.48.


   Percent mortality in crabs fed oysters  containing 1.9 yg/g Kepone


and those fed James River oysters was significantly greater (ct=
         »
0.05) than those fed control oysters (Fig. 4).  Blue crabs which ato


oysters containing 1.9 yg/g Kepone exhibited extreme excitation,


especially during feeding.  In the advanced stages of Kepone


poisoning, the crabs were generally lethargic for several days


before death.  No crabs in any other aquaria displayed these signs.


Percent mortality of crabs fed oysters containing 0.15 yg/g Kepone


was not significantly different from that of crabs fed control

oysters.
                                 13

-------
                             DISCUSSION

   The uptake and depuration of Kepone by  blue  crabs  in  both  studies

help explain why relatively high Kepone  residues are  found  in crabs

from the James River,  Virginia.  No discernible depuration  of Kepone

in crab nfuscle or remaining tissues was  evident in  28 days  but some

loss of Kepone was apparent beyond 28 days.   However, detectable

Kepone was present in tissues of crabs held  90  days in a Kepone-free

environment.  In the James River, Bender et  al. (1977) reported that

average Kepone concentrations in estuarine vertebrates and

invertebrates ranged from 0.09 to 2.0 yg/g.   Many,  if not all, of

the species listed" are included in the diet  of the  blue  crab.

Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude  from our  laboratory studies

and James River field data that Kepone residues will persist in blue

crab tissues as long as detectable concentrations remain in the

food.

   Blue crabs fed oysters containing 1.9 yg/g Kepone exhibited signs

of poisoning similar to crabs  fed fish contaminated with 1.0 yg/g of

mirex  (Lowe et al., 1971).  Mirex is an organochlorine insecticide

chemically similar to Kepone.   Lowe et al.  (1971)  also reported
                                                                   t>
that juvenile blue crabs exposed to  100 yg/£ mirex in flowing

seawater  for 96 hours showed no signs of poisoning.  Schimmel and
                                 14

-------
Wilson (1977) exposed blue crabs to Kepone  for  96  hours  at




concentrations as high as 210 ug/£  and reported no significant



mortality.




   Blue crabs fed oysters from the  James River  (containing  0.15  yg/g



Kepone) died in significantly greater numbers and  molted fewer  times




than those fed uncontarainated oysters; crabs fed oysters containing




0.15 yg/g Kepone (by laboratory exposure) moulted  fewer  times but



did not die in significantly different numbers  than those fed




uncontaminted oysters.  Reasons for the difference in mortality are




unclear.  However, it should be noted that a 0.15  yg/g Kepone



residue appears to' be the threshold level for effect: blue  crabs fed




local oysters contaminated with 1.9 yg/g Kepone suffered 80%




mortality, and those fed local oysters contaminated with 0.25 yg/g



Kepone died in greater numbers than those fed control oysters.   It




is possible that the difference in mortality in the crabs fed James




River oysters (0.15 yg/g) and those fed local,  contaminated oysters




(0.15 yg/g) may be due to a toxicant not detectable by our  methods



of chemical analysis or that our methods of exposure and duration



were different than those of oysters from the James River.   To




investigate the possibility of some metal in the oysters, samples of



local and James River oysters were sent to the  EPA Environmental
                                15

-------
Research Laboratory, Athens,  Georgia,  for analysis.   Results of




these analyses (multielement analysis  by plasma emission and spark




source mass specrometry)  indicated that oysters from the James




River contained approximately 5 x more aluminum (70  ug/g) ,  10 x more




copper (2-9 ^g/g), and 9 x more zinc (415 ug/g) than  local oysters.




Concentrations of other metals in oysters from both  areas were




similar.  We do not know the effects of these motals and Kepone on




the survival of blue crabs.                                    S




   Annual crab fishery statistics (U.S. Dept. Comm., 1968-197^) from




the James River show that from 1968 to 1972 the commercial catch




ranged from 691,000 kg to 1,211,000 kg ("x = 899,000  kg), but from




1972 through 1975 the catch decreased more than 9Q£  to 14,700 kg.




(A moratorium on harvesting of blue crabs in the James River was in




effect in 1976),  The blue crab catch in the adjacent Rappahannock




River estuary from  1968 through 1975 did not show a  significant




decline.  From these catch data it appears that some pertubation is




causing a particularly adverse affect on blue crab abundance in the




James River estuary.




   If the James River estuary had been affected by only one




pollutant, it would have been comparatively easy to determine a




cause and effect relationship with that pollutant and the decrease
                                  16

-------
in the crab fishery.   As in nearly all  instances  in  the  natural
                                                                    <

environment, this is  not the case in the heavily  industrialized
   ^
James River area.  However, based on our laboratory  data,  we  believe


that Kepone may be a  factor in the decline  of the James  River crab


fishery.
                                  17

-------
                          LITERATURE CITED


ANONYMOUS.  1941.  Atlantic Coast blue crab,  an  important  enemy  of


   oysters.  Oyster Institute of North America,  Trade  Rpt.


   No. 44, 2p.


BAHNER, .LOWELL H., ALFRED J. WILSON, JR.,  JAMES  M.  SHEPPARD,  JAKES   '


   M. PATRICK, JR., LARRY R. GOODMAN, AND  GERALD E. WALSH.   1977.


   Kepone bioconcentration, accumulation,  loss,  and transfer  through.


   estuarine food chains.  Chesapeake Sci. 18(3):299-30b .


BENDER, M.E., R.J. HUGGETT AND W.J. HARGIS.  1977.   Kepone* residues'


   in Chesapeake Bay biota, Kepone Seminar II,  September 20 and  21,


   Easton, Maryland.


LOGSANOFF, V.L.  1948.  Crabs as destroyers of oysters,  Notes from


   A.F. Chestnut.  Pastor Institute of N or t1? America,  Trade


   Rep. No. 9B, 2p.


LOWE, J.I., P.K. PARRISH, A.J. WILSON, JR., P.O. WILSON, AMD  T.W.

                                                                    4
   DUKE.   1971.  Effects of mirex on selected estuarine organisms.


   Trans. ^6th No. Amer. Wildl. Nat. _Res.  Conf.

   171-1S6.


LUNZ, G.R.  1947.  Callinectos versus Ostroa. J.. of the Elisha


   Mitchell Sci. Soc. 63:61.

MENZEL, R.W. AND S.H. HOPKINS.  1956.  Crabs as  predators  of  oysters
                                 18

-------
   in Louisiana.  Proc. Natl. Shellfish Assoc. 46:177-184.




MENZEL, R.W. AND F.E. NICHY.  1958.  Studies of the distribution and

  >


   feeding habits of some oyster predators in Alligator Harbor,




   Florida.  Bull. Mar. Sci. of the Gulf and Caribbean.  8:125-145.




SCHIMMEL, S.C., J.M. PATRICK, JR., AND A.J. WILSON, JR.  1977.
       *                                                            .



   Acute toxicity to and bioconcentration of ondosulfan by estuarino




   animals.  Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Evaluation.  ASTM STP




   634, F.L. Mayer and J.L. Haraelink, Eds., American Society for




   Testing and Materials.   1977.




	AND A.J. WILSON, JR.  1977.  Acute toxicity of




    Kepone to four estuarine animals,  Chesapeake JSci..




   18:224-227.




U.S. Department of Commerce,  1968-1975.  Virginia landings.  Cujrr.




   JFjjj3h. J3ta_t.
                                 19

-------
Table 1.  Concentrations of Kepone used in Study No. 1 for 28-day exposure


          of blue crabs (Callinectes spp.) to the insecticide in seawater
> or in food (eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica) .


AQUARIUM
»
1
2
3
4
5
6

1
KEPONE
WATER (yg/£)
ND2
0.03
0.03
0.3
0.3
ND



FOOD (yg/£)
0.25
ND
0.25
0.25
ND
ND
    Uptake period was followed by a 28-day depuration period in which no


    Kepone was administered in food or in seawater.

   2
    ND - non-detectable: < 0.02 yg/£ in water, <0.02 yg/g in oyster tissue.

-------
Tabel 2.  Experimental design for 56-day exposure of blue crabs (Callinectes _sp_p_.) to the insecticide,

          Kepone, in eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) (Study No. 2)
AQUARIUM
SOURCE OF
 OYSTERS
CONCENTRATION
  OF KEPONE
 i,N OYSTERS
    (ug/g)
                                                                                   OBSERVATION
  1

  2

  3

  4

  5

  6
                  Santa Rosa Sound,  Florida

                  Santa Rosa Sound,  Florida

                  James River,  Virginia

                  James River,  Virginia

                  Santa Rosa Sound,  Florida

                  Santa Rosa Sound,  Florida
                                          ND

                                          ND

                                          0.15

                                          0.15

                                          0.15
                      Molting and Survival

                      Uptake/Depuration

                      Molting and Survival

                      Uptake/Depuration

                      Molting and Survival

                      Molting and Survival
 ND = non-detectable;  <0.02 yg/g in tissues.

-------
Tabel 3.  Total molts and mortality of blue crabs (Callinectes spp.)  in Kepone Study No. 1.

          Fifty-six crabs were placed in each aquarium at the beginning of the test.        f

                     .                     I  :        - .•      -  •      — —    j

Aquarium No.                    Test Conditions                   Molts              Mortality


    1                     Control water ;               ',          18                    15
                          0.25 yg/g Kepone in oyster

    2                     0.03 yg/£ Kepone in water;
                          Control oysters                          20                     6

    3                     0.03 yg/g Kepone in water;              12                    20
                          0.25 yg/g Kepone in oysters

    4                     0.3 yg/£ Kepone  in water;                18                    14
                          0.25 yg/g Kepone in oysters

    5                     0.3 yg/2. Kepone  in water;                22                     9
                          Control oysters
                                                 \
    6                     Control water;
                          Control oysters                          21                     7


     Control water, <0.02 yg/£ Kepone; Control oysters, <0.02 yg/g Kepone.

-------
K^ps.™
'-: Sh«•'„•-/ • :•
;*£.;'*: -
0»

0>



UJ
_J
O
05



CD

a:
o




UJ

o
Q.
UJ
                    0.01-
                                                     V
                                                Detection Limit
                                                                 42

                                                             DEPURATION
                                                                56
                                              TIME (days)

-------
Figure 2.  The 28-day accumulation of Kepone by blue crabs (Calllnectes spp.) fed James River




       '   oysters that contained 0.15 yg/g Kepone.  In the depuration period, crabs were fed




           Kepone-free (<0.02 yg/g) oysters.  Kepone residue for muscle on day 118 is estimated




           to be 0.014 yg/g.              ."

-------
     0.100
0>
—
o»
JD
O

O

0>

CO



•E  0.020
CD
C
O
ex

-------
                                        l\
                                        »



Figure 1.  Bioaccumulation of Keponc in muscle tissues of blue crabs (Callincctcs spp.)



           fed oysters contaminated with 0.25 wg/g of the insecticide for 28 days



    f      followed by a 28-day period for depuration.  The uptake curve and the 95%



           confidence interval represented arc a composite of three homogeneous curves



           representing uptake in crabs fed: (1) 0.25 yg/g Kepone in oysters and control seawater,



           (2) 0.25 ug/g Kepone in oysters and 0.03 ug/t, in seawater, and (3) 0.25 ug/g in



           oysters and 0.3 ug/Jl in seawater.

-------

Total  Moults

-------
                                            >  \
                                            I
Figure 3.  Molting rate of blue crabs (Callinectes spp.) fed uncontaminated (<0.02 ug/g Kepone)




           or Kepone contaminated eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) for 56 days on a flow-




           through bioassay.   Molting rates are for crabs that survived the entire study in each




           test aquarium.   The test conditions and numbers of surviving crabs are: control, 57 crabs;

-------
ioor
                                                                  l.9|ig/g
                                                                (Laboratory)
                                                                0.15 pg/g
                                                              (Jamas River)
                                                                0.15 ng/g
                                                            ^(Laboratory)

                                                            ?  O.O^g/g
                                                               (Laboratory)
                                                                 60
70
                               Time (days)

-------
Figure 4.  Mortality of blue crabs (Calllnectes spp.) fed uncontaminated (<0.02 yg/g Kepone) or




           Kepone contaminated eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) for 56 days in a flow-through




           bioassay.

-------
                          John D. Costlow
                     QUARTERLY PROGRAM REPORT

                      June - September 1977
                  Environmental Protection Agency
                        Grant £R8Q3833-02-0

              Effects of Insect Growth Regulators and
                    Juvenile Hormone Mimics on
                      Crustacean Development
Effect of Juvenile Hormone Mimics and Insect Growth Regulators
on Larval Development of Brachyura	

     Four different experiments were undertaken as continuations
of earlier work on the effects of DimilinR  (TH-6040) on larval
development of several marine Brachyura.  The first experiment
was to determine the rate of deterioration of Dimilin in seawater
through bioassay and, subsequently, chemical analysis.  The
second experiment was designed to determine the degree of
sensitivity of individual larval stages to Dimilin. ' The third
experiment was designed to examine differential sensitivity to
Dimilin during particular times of the intermolt period of the
larvae.  The fourth experiment involved, preparation of larvae
exposed to Dimilin during specific stages of development for
electron microscopy studies of cuticle*  ?

     As indicated in the previous'quarterly report  (March-May,
1977) volumes of 10 ppb Dimilin were prepared in 20 ppt seawater,
stored in natural daylight at room temperatures, and used for a
period of approximately 70 days as the culture solution for
successive hatches of larvae of Rhithropanopeus harrisii.  As
indicated in Table I, there was a high mortality of larvae during
the first stage of development in all series cultured up to 69
days following preparation of the Dimilin solution.  All larvae
succumbed, in some cases after successfully completing zoeal
development, by varying times, ranging from eight days following
hatching to 17 days.   When the solution was 29 days old, 25%
survived to the second zoeal stage but these larvae died before
or during molting to the third zoeal stage.  Nearly all larvae
appeared normal in morphological and behavioral respects until
they began to noIt to the second zoeal stage.  At that time, the
majority died during molting, frequently without being able to
remove the old exoskcleton.   Those that did manage to complete
the molt were abnormal with deformed swimming setae and were
in capable of normal swimming.  There were other morphological
defects,  including rostral and antennal spines.  In all controls,
survival ranged from 39 to 99 percent with an extremely small
percentage (1-4)  of abnormalities throughout all of the zoeal
staces.

-------
                                                              -2-
      Earlier  experiments  in  this  laboratory  have  shown that 10 ppb
 Dimilin  is  lethal  to  R. harrisii  larvae when they are exposed at
 the  time of hatching  and  that  only  a  few  larvae will survive beyond
 the  first zoeal  stage.  As shown  in Table II,  10  ppb Dimilin is
 lethal to other  stages as well.   One  hundred percent mortality
 occurred during  molting when the  larvae were exposed to 10 ppb
 Dimilin  in  the second stage, the  third stage,  and the fourth zoeal
 stages,  whereas  97-99% survived in  the control series without
 Dimilin.  The megalopa, however,  did  not  appear to be as sensitive
 to this  compound as the zoeal  larvae.  When  megalopa are exposed
 to Dimilin, 44%  did survive  to the  crab stage;  within the control
 series,  91% survived.

      First  zoeal larvae of Rhithropanopeus harrisii larvae were
 exposed  to  10 ppb  Dimilin at various  times within one intermolt
 period.   At 25°C,  molting to the  second stage begins on day 4.
 Individual  larvae  were exposed to 10  ppb  Dimilin  on day 1, day 2,
 or day 3, on  days  1 and 2, on  days  2  and  3,  and on days 1 through
 3.   Results,  as  shown in Table III, indicate that  the larvae were
 more  sensitive to  the compound late in the intermolt period than
 at the beginning of the intermolt period.  The variations in
 survival  of replicates are probably due to the time exposure
 relative  to the  time  of hatching.   Exposure  to Dimilin was initiated
 in the mornings  whereas the  larvae  could  have hatched at any time
 between  the previous  evening and  the  early morning when exposure
 was  initiated.                            /

      A few  zoeal larvae exposed to  10 ppb Dimilin, as well- as"larvae
 from  the  control series, were  fixed for electron microscopy studies
 in glutaraldehyde  and OsO^.  Some exposed first stage zoeae were
 fixed during  molting  to the  second  zoeal  stage.   Sections of the
 dorsal spine  have  recently been prepared  and preliminary studies
 under the electron microscope  indicate that  the cuticle is
 considerably  altered  in those  larvae  that have been'exposed to
 Dimilin when  compared with larvae within  the control series.


 Effects of Juvenile Hormone Mimics and Insect Growth Regulators
 on Behavior of Bracnyuran Larvae	

     The manuscript entitled "Sublethal Effects of Insect Growth
 Regulators upon  Crab Larval  Behavior" was accepted for publication
 by Water, Air and  Soil Pollution.   This work clearly indicated
 that sublethal concentrations of Dimilin and hydroprene alter
 phototaxis and swimming by Rhithropanopeus harrisii larvae.   Thus
work this summer has focused on considering  the functional signi-
 ficance of responses to light and other environmental variables.

     The main study determined whether the change in phototactic
pattern upon light and dark adaptation could serve as the basis
 for a diurnal vertical migration pattern.   The accumulated evidence
 indicated that this probably does  not occur.   This work was  pre-
 sented at the 12th European Marine Biological Symposium (September,
 1977).

-------
                                                              -3-
     A second area of intensive investigation was a field study
of R. harrisii larval distributions in relation to environmental
factors^At a fixed station in the Newport River Estuary hourly
vertical samples were taken of larvae, light intensity, tempera-
ture, salinity and currents.  This was carried out twice with the
first session lasting four days.  The second was terminated after
two and a half days due to a mechanical breakdown.  The collected
samples are now being analyzed.  It is anticipated that this
information will indicate which environmental factors are important
in establishing crustacean larval distributions within an estuary.


Effects of Kepone on Development of Callinectes sapidus and
Rhithropanopeus harrisii	

Preparation for Experiments

     Disposal of Kepone Solutions.  In response to a telephone
conversation to CHEM-DYNE CORPORATION, Bruce A. Whitten, President,
sent me a letter July 15, 1977 stating that their disposal fee
in 55-gallon drum quantities would, be $50 per drum F..O.B./ Hamilton,
Ohio.  He suggested that we pour our Kepone contaminated brine from
finger bowls into one-gallon plastic jugs and cap the jugs.  The
filled jugs could then be packed into 55-gallon open-top steel
drums.  The spaces between and above jugs could be filled with
VERMICULITE.  The drums should be labeled/Waste Brine Solution"
and shipped to CHEM-DYNE CORP., Hamilton,'Ohio.  Our drums will
be consolidated with others to  form a full drum truckload which
will be disposed of in full compliance with all Federal, State,
and local environmental regulations by secured chemical landfill
at the same site used by the U.S. Government for radioactive
wastes.

     On July 18, 1977 Mr. William L. Blake, Safety Coordinator,
Duke University, and Dr. Conrad M. Knight,  Radiological Officer of
Duke University-Duke University Medical Center were informed by
phone of our plans to dispose of Kepone.   On July 20 the same
information was put in a letter and sent to Mr. Blake.  On July
18, 1977,  I also phoned the North Carolina Department of Agri-
culture,  Pest Control Division, and talked to Larry D. Perry,
Pesticide Specialist, EPA coordinator, about our experiments and
methods of disposing of brine contaminated Kepone.  On July 19,
1977 Mr.  Larry D.  Perry wrote me that his office approved of our
suggested method of disposing of waste Kepone.  Mr. Blake and
Dr. Knight also approved of CHEM-DYNE CORPORATION'S plan.  Mr.
Larry D.  Perry suggested as an alternative that we send our wastes
to Rollins Environmental Services, P.  0.  Box 221, Bridgeoort, NJ
08014.

     Supplies.   Orders for supplies of essential glassware, plastics
pipettors,  chemicals and a utility cart were placed and goods
received.   Chem Services were slow in filling our order for Kepone
and charged $120.00 for 10 grams rather than $34.58 as in order
placed by  EPA,  Gulf Breeze on December 15,  1975.

-------
                                                               -4-
      Open-top  55  gallon  steel  drums  and  vermiculite were  furnished
 by Dr.  Conrad  M.  Knight,  Radiological  Safety  Officer  of Duke Uni-
 versity-Duke University  Medical  Center and  one-gallon plastic  jugs
 were  contributed  by  DUML personnel.

      Preparation  of  Kepone  Stock Solutions.   Dr. Adam Zsolnay,
 chemist at  Duke University  Marine Laboratory  (DUML),  prepared  stock
 solutions by dissolving  a known  weight of Kepone in pesticide  grade
 acetone and different  concentrations were made up  from, this stock
 solution.   The potency of some of these  solutions  were checked by
 Dr. Zsolnay after a  month and  a  half.

      Source of Ovigerous  Crabs and Hatching of Eggs.  Ovigerous
 Callinectes sapidus  were  collected in  the Newport  River near Beaufor
 N.C.  Four  crabs  with  dark  eggs,  eyes, and visible heartbeats were
 selected as a  source of  larvae.   Isolated eggs were allowed to hatch
 in filtered seawater with a salinity of  30°/oo in  compartmented
 boxes and flasks  on  a  variable speed shaker according to  the method
 described by Costlow and  Bookhout, 1960, and  Bookhout and Costlow,
 1975.

      Ovigerous Rhithropanopeus harrisii  were  collected near Beaufort
 in August and  September  1977.  When they were returned to the
 laboratory  each crab was  placed  in a large glass finger bowl (19.4
 cm. d)  containing  filtered  seawater with a salinity of 20°/Oor
 the salinity to be used during rearing of/larvae for experiments
 with  Kepone.   The  ovigerous  crabs were maintained  in a constant
 temperature culture  cabinet  at 25°C and  with  a light regime of 12 h
 light and 12 h darkness until  hatching occurred.

      Rearing of Larvae in Range-finding  Experiments.  The methods of
 rearing larvae of  R. harrisii  and C. sapidus  in 1 'ppt acetone contro
 and five concentrations of  Kepone were essentially the same as out-
 lined in the July  14,  1977  proposal, p.  4-7.


 Direction of Work, Including Number and  Kind  of Experiments Conducte*
 and Latest  Results	  ._.	

     Range  finding experiments using Callinectes sapidus  larvae as
 bioassay organisms were designed to run  for 20 days.  Four replicate:
 were run with  50 freshly hatched C. sapidus larvae in each of the
 six media of four  series  (I-IV).   The percent survival for each
 series is given in Table IV.   There was differential survival with
 increase in concentration, but the survival in acetone control was
 far from satisfactory.   Apparently the eggs from each of  the four
mother crabs were poor.  In previous experiments on the effect of
mirex on blue crab larvae (Bookhout and Costlow, 1975),  the effects
 of methor.ychlor on larvae of Rhithropanopeus harrisii and C. sapidus,
 ana the effects of malathion on larvae of the same species (Bookhout
 and Monroe,  1977), the average survival of blue crab"larvae to the
 crab stage over a period beyond 40 days was over 50% in acetone con-
 trol.   The blue crab larvae were  reared earlier than those reported

-------
                                                              -5-
here.  As was mentioned in the proposal, July 14, 1977, blue crab
larvae in the latter part of August do not survive as well in the
laboratory as those hatched in the beginning of the breeding season
the later part of April and May.  Our current experiments were
conducted during the first two-thirds of August.  The high tempera-
tures throughout the summer may have been partly responsible.
Regardless of the cause, it is obvious that other range-finding
experiments will have to be conducted in May 1978 and definitive
experiments done afterwards.

     Range-finding experiments using Rhithropanopeus harrisii
larvae as bioassay organisms were initially designed to run from
the time of hatching to the first crab stage.  Each of the first
five series of R. harrisii larvae used came from the eggs of a
single female; the sixth series came from eggs hatched from two
females.

     Since running four series of C. sapidus larvae (1200) took
an exorbitant amount of time, two series of larvae (600) were run
concurrently in case of R. harrisii.  Based on the results of the
previous experiment with C. sapidus larvae, it was decided to use
the following concentrations of Kepone to test the viability of
R. harrisii larvae, Series I and II:  0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40 and
0.80 Ppb.  The results are given in Table V.  Since survival to
the crab stage in Series I ranged from -94 to 100% in the concen-
trations of Kepone used compared to 92% in acetone control, it
was concluded that concentrations of 0.-05 ppb to 0.80 ppb Kepone
were not toxic to R. harrisii developmental stages.

     In Series III and IV concentrations of Kepone used were 0.1,
2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 ppb.  The percent survival for 11 days in
these concentrations was from 96 to 100% in Series III and 92 to
100% in Series IV (Table VI).   Hence, these concentrations do not
affect the survival of R.  harrisii zoeae..

     In Series V and VI the range of concentrations of Kepone
used were:  10.0, 20.0, 40.0, 80.0 and 160.0 ppb.  Survival of
zoeae for 11 days in these concentrations is given in Table VII.
It appears from these experiments that survival of zoeae is not
affected by 10.0 and 20.0  ppb Kepone, whereas a concentration of
40.0 ppb is sublethal and  80.0 ppb and 160.0 ppb is acutely toxic.


Predictions and Plans for  the Next Reporting Period

     In the next range-finding experiments the following concen-
trations of Kepone will be used:  20.0, 35.0, 50.0, 65.0, and 80.0
ppb.   This experiment should be the last range-finding one for R.
harrisii larvae and should furnish reliable information concerning
the concentrations to use  in definitive experiments.   Florida
crabs will be used for the next range-finding experiments, because
local R.  harrisii femlaes  have reached the end of their breeding
season.   Arrangements will be made with a Florida supplier to ship

-------
                                                              -6-
ovigerous  crabs  to us in January for range-finding experiments
and two other  shipments for definitive experiments in February
and March.  Thereafter we will concentrate our efforts on range-
finding and definitive experiments with blue crab larvae.

     Because it  will not be possible to obtain ovigerous R. harrisi.
and C. sapidus in the best condition during the next quarterly
report we  will have little to report.


Problems Encountered

1.   Blue  crab eggs hatched from four females on July 27, 28 and
     29 proved to be less viable than those from 1972-76.

2.   Our constant temperature culture cabinet broke down in
     October and will not be fixed until the end of October.
Current Status of Publications

Latz, M.I. and R.B. Forward.  1977.  The effect of salinity upon
     phototaxis and geotaxis in a larval crustacean.  Biol. Bull.,
     153:163-179.                        /

Forward, R.B., Jr. and J.D. Costlow, Jr.  1977.  Sublethal 'effects
     of insect growth regulators upon crab larval behavior.
     Water, Air and Soil Poll.  In Press.

Forward, R.B., Jr. and T.W. Cronin.  1977.  Crustacean larval
     phototaxis:  possible functional significance..  In:   12th
     European Marine Biological Symposium.  In Press.
Publications in Preparation

Christiansen, M.E. and J.D. Costlow.  1973. - Effects of Dimilin
     on the Development of the Mud-Crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii.

Christiansen, M.E. and J.D. Costlow.  1978.  Bioassay studies on
     rate of deterioration of the compound Dimilin.

-------
Age of solution
when exposure
was started
     EXiys
   Number of
  Replicates
Control  10 ppb
 Initial Number
   of Larvae
Control  10 ppb
                                                      TABLE I
 Survival (%)
 to Megalopa
Control  10 ppb
Days after
hatching when
all larvae were
dead in 10 ppb
Mortality  (%) of develop-
mental stages in 10 ppb
   I     II     III     IV
0
1
3
5
7
9
12
1G
21
29
40
51
59
69
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
150
150
120
70
150
100
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
120
70
150
100
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
98.0
92.7
97.5
94.3
94.0
93.0
99.3
94.7
89.3
93.3
*
83.3
88.7
76.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
74.7
78.0
78.0
12
16
8
13
12
10
10
9
9
17
12
-
95.3
91.3
99.2
90.0
90.7
99.0
97.3
100
100
74.4


2.7
7.3
0.8
8.6
9.3
1.0
2.7


24.6

Days
2.0
0.7 0

1.4





0 0

40 - 69

.7







.7


- Data not analyzed
^

as
yet

  Controls Day 40 were terminated at Day 12 when all 10 ppb Larvae Died.

-------
                             Table II
Larvae    Number
Exposed   of
In        Replicates
      Control       Exposed in 10 ppb
Initial  Survival   Initial  Survival
Number       (%)      Number       (%)
1st stage
2nd stage
3rd stage
4th stage
Megalopa
3
3
3
4
4
120
146
144
167
109
97
98
99
98
91
.5
.6
.3
.8
.7
120
150
139
170
111
0
0
0
0
44.1

-------
                             TABLE III

Survival (%) to the megalopa stage v;hen larvae were exposed at
various days during the first zoeal stage.
                       Control              10 ppb Dimilin
Exposure of           Replicate               Replicate
10 ppb on           123            123
Day
Day
Day
Day
Day
Day
1
2
3
1 and 2
2 and 3
1 to 3
92
92
92
92
92
92
86
86
86
86
86

86
86
86



48
68
28
62
8
2
90
18
0
4
.0

88
46
10




-------
                              TABLE IV
Species:  Callinectes sapidus
Bowl Size:  8.9 cm diam
~ of Bowls:  5 per concentration
Larvae per bowl:  10
Total r Larvae:  50 per
                 concentration
Date Hatched:
               Series I 7/27/77
               Series II & III 7
               Series IV 7/29/77
Salinity:  30°/QO
Temperature:  25°C
Light:  12-12
Diet:  Artemia nauplii and
       Arbacia embryos
                              SERIES I

Percent survival to day 20, or day when there was no survival
Acetone
Control
Day 20
20,
*o
0.05 ppb
Kepone
Day 20
20%
0.5 ppb
Kepone
Day 16
0%
1 . 0 ppb
Kepone
Day 17
0%
5 . 0 ppb
Kepone
Day 10
0%
10.0 ppb
Kepone
Day 8
no.
U -o
                             SERIES II

Percent survival to dav 20, or day when inhere was no survival
Acetone
Control
Day 20
4%
0.05 ppb
Kepone
Day 20
205 •
0 . 5 ppb
Kepone
Day 20
0%
1 . 0 ppb
Kepone
Day 15
0%
5 . 0 ppb
Kepone
Dav 12
0%
10.0 ppb
Kepone ' "
Day 11
0%
                             SERIES III

Percent survival to day 20, or day when there was no survival
Acetone
Control
Day 2 0
18 °6
0.05 ppb
Kepone
Day 20
18 5
0 . 5 ppb
Kepone
Day 15
0%
1 . 0 ppb
Kepone
Day 14
0%
5 . 0 ppb
Kepone
Day 13
0%
10.0 ppb
Kepone
Day 10
0%
                             SERIES IV

Percent survival to day 20, or day when there was no survival
/'icetone
Control
Day 20
12%
0.05 ppb
Kepone
Day 20
143
0.5 ppb
Kepone
Day 17
0°o
1.0 ppb
Kepone
Day 17
0°,
5 . Q ppb
Keoone
Day 11
0?0
10.0 ppb
Kepone
Day 9
0%

-------
                              TABLE V
Species:  Rhithropanopeus harrisii  Date Hatched:   8/18/77
Bowl Size: 8.9 cm diam
= of Bowls: 5 per concentration
Larvae per bowl: 10
Total = Larvae: 50 per
concentration
Salinity: 20°/oo
Temperature: 25°C
Light 12-12
Diet: Artemia nauplii



SERIES I

% to Megalopa
% to Crab
% Megalopa to
Crab

Acetone 0.05 ppb
Control Kepone
92 100
92 100
100 100

0.10 ppb
Kepone
100
100
100
x
0.20 ppb 0.40 ppb
Kepone Kepone
96 100
94 100
98 100

0.8C
Kepc
1C
1C
1C

SERIES II - '" -

% to Megalopa
S to Crab
Acetone 0.05 ppb
Control Kepone
92 96
90 56
0.10 ppb
Kepone
98
92
0.20 ppb 0.40 ppb
Kepone Kepone
92 94
92 92
0.8C
Kepc
c
I
% Megalopa to
  Crab
                  98
60
94
100
98

-------
              TABLE VI
Species:  Rhithropancpeus harrisii
Bowl Size:  8.9 cm diam
£ of Bowls:  5 per concentration
Larvae per bowl:  0
Total = Larvae:  50 per
                 concentration
                      Date hatched:   9/16/77
                      Salinity:  20°/oo
                      Temperature:  25°C
                      Light:  12-12
                      Diet:  Artemia  nauplii
              SERIES III
Acetone  0.1 ppb  2.5 ppb  5.0 ppb  7.5 ppb  10.0 pp
Control  Kepone   Kepone   Kepone   Kepone   Kepone
% Survival
  for 11 days
100
100
96
100
                                                     100
                                                96
              SERIES IV
Acetone  0.1 ppb  2.5 ppb  5.0 ppb  7.5 ppb" ~ '10.0 pp
Control  Kepone   Kepone   Kepone   Kepone   Kepone
% Survival
  for 11 days
100
100
96
 98
                                                      92
                                                96

-------
                             TABLE VII
Species:  Rhithropanopeus harrisii
Bowl size:  small, 8.9 cm diam
% of Bowls:  5 per concentration
Larvae per box/1:  10
Total = Larvae:  50 per
                 concentration
                   Date Hatched:  9/27/77
                   Salinity:  20°/oo
                   Temperature:  25°C
                   Light:  12-12
                   Diet:  Artemia nauplii
                             SERIES V
               Acetone  10.0 ppb  20.0 ppb  40.0 ppb  80.0 ppb  160,
               Control  Kepone    Kepone    Kepone    Kepone    Kepc
  Survival
  for 11 days
82
 86
88
34
                             SERIES VI
               Acetone
               Control
      10.0 ppb
      Kepone
        20. 0' ppb
        Kepone
       40.0 ppb
       Kenone
       SO.O ppb
       Kepone"
160
Keo;
  Survival
  for 11 days
86
100
90
64'

-------
  The Role of Sediments in the Storage,
Movement and Biological Uptake of Kepone
        in Estuarine Environments
              Annual Report

                   to:

   The Environmental Protection Agency



                  From:

    Robert J. Huggett, Project Manager
 The Virginia Institute of Marine Science
             For the period
          10/20/76 to 10/20/77
       Grant Identification Number
               R804993010

-------
                       Preface





     Included in this document are three sections which



describe the efforts of the Virginia Institute of Marine



Science's staff on the Role of Sediments in the Storage,



Movement and Biological Uptake of Kepone in Estuarine



Environments.  The first section is entitled: "Kepone in



James River Sediment," by Maynard M. Nichols and Richard



C. Trotman.  The second, "Kepone Water-Sediment Elutriates,"



by Robert J. Huggett and the third, "Uptake of Kepone From



Suspended Sediments by Oysters, Rangia and Macoma,." is



by Dexter S. Haven and Reinaldo Morales-Alamo.



     Also attached is a progress report on the EPA funded



James River Hydrographical Survey Study which was conducted



in the late summer of 1977.

-------
               KEPONE IN JAMES RIVER SEDIMENTS



              An annual progress report to EPA



                             by



         Maynard M.  Nichols and Richard C. Trotman



                        October 1977







 1.  Purpose.



     This study aims to determine where kepone has accumulated in



the bottom sediments; that is, where are the sediment sinks for



kepone?  A second aim is to trace the routes and rates of trans-



port; that is, what  happens to kepone-bound sediment when released



from its source?  Finally, how long will i£ take to reduce levels



of kepone in the sediment by natural processes?



     Results emerging from the study are of use to advise state



and federal authorities how to clean-up kepone pollution through



natural processes.  They provide basic data on sedimentary pro-



cesses for benthic ecosystem models; they are of use for evalu-



ating the effects of dredging kepone-rich sediments.  As a



tracer of sediment,  kepone provides new information on sediment



dispersal and the circulation of fine-grained material in a



classic estuary.





 2.  Highlights of Activities.



     Efforts during  the period were highlighted by the following:



         •Review of  James River sediment data to predict fate of



          kepone for program formulation.
                            - 1 -

-------
•Presentation  of  paper  on results historical  review,



 First  Kepone  Seminar,  at VIMS,  October  1976.



•Preliminary field  sampling  of  surface sediments  along



 length of  James  in three periods,  September,  December



 1976,  and  March  1977;  37 to 52 stations  sampled  during



 each  period;  18  cores  obtained.



•Co-ordination conferences with EPA program manager,



 Dr. Tudor  Davies,  Gulf Breaze  and  Virginia State Water



 Control Board, October through December,  1976.



•Employment of project  personnel, Mr. Richard Trotman,



 completed  April  1977;  sedimentologic effort  in  full



 swing.                         j



•Liason with Battelle Northwest, Dr. Onishi,  on  field



 programs and  math  model formulation.



•Liason with Manhatten  College,  Dr. D. O1Conner  and



 R. Thomann, concerning formulation of a math model



 for sediment  and kepone transport.



•Development of structure for mathematical model  of



 sediment-kepone  transport with Dr. Kuo.



•Formulate  plans  for suspended  sediment-kepone field



 study, May 1977.



•Follow-up  sampling of  bottom sediments  and selected



 cores  of dredge  disposal sites, July  1977.  Continued



 lab analyses  of  these  samples  and  previous samples.





                   - 2  -

-------
         'Preparation for field study;  filters,  field equipment,

          and field labs for processing suspended sediment,  June

          through July 1977.

         •Field observations, sampling and measurement of kepone

          on suspended sediment, currents, and related parameters,

          August 1977.

         •Laboratory analyses of suspended sediment samples, total

          concentration, organic content, September through

          October 1977.

         •Participation in Second Kepone Seminar and'kepone

          Symposium at the 4th International Conference on

          Estuaries.
                                         /
         •Follow-up sampling of bed sediments in Hampton Roads

          and lower Chesapeake Bay in conjunction with closing

          of area to crabbing; 12 stations occupied.

         •Field sampling of bed sediments curtailed in October

          1977.  Data reduction largely complete.


 3.  Approach.

     Efforts during the period mainly consisted of field sampling,

laboratory analyses, and data reduction.  First, historical data

on kepone and James River sediments were reviewed to identify

probable kepone sediment sinks and relative rates of deposition.

Sampling stations were sited throughout the estuary in relation

to water depth, bathymetry, oyster grounds, deposition patterns,

dredge and disposal sites, and in relation to the kepone source.


                            - 3 -

-------
Field procedures were worked out to sample freshly deposited sedi-



ment on the bed as well as in cores at selected sites.  Laboratory



procedures were set up to process samples for particle size and



organic content.  The horizontal and vertical distributions of



kepone were delineated graphically and evaluated with time over



one year in relation to basic information concerning sedimentary



processes and transport of fine-grained sediment.  An attempt was



made to determine from field samples the distribution of kepone



in relation to particle size and organic content.





 4.  Methods and Procedures.



     Bed sediments were obtained by a Petersen grab with a 0.05 m£



bite area or a 7.6 cm (3-inch) diameter cocer.  The corer was



especially constructed for obtaining soft mud with minimal- dis-



turbance.  Approximately 30 ml of sediment was obtained from the



top sediment surface and returned to the laboratory for analyses.



Stations were closely positioned by ranging or sextant bearings



on buoys and landmarks.  Samples were frozen prior to laboratory



analyses.



     In the laboratory bulk sediment samples were processed for:



(1) kepone content,  (2) organic matter by loss on ignition, and



(3) particle size (percentage sand, silt and clay) by sieving



and pipette.  Additionally, the sieved fraction, less than 63u



of samples collected in September and December 1976, was analysed



for both kepone content and for particle size by a Coulter Counter.



Laboratory methods follow conventional procedures described in





                            - 4 -

-------
                     ORIGINAL
                      SAMPLE
                      FREEZER
                      STORAGE
                   PARTICLE SIZE
                     ANALYSES,
                 SIEVE AND PIPETTE
                           PARTICLE
                            SIZE
                           < 63U,
                          COULTER
                          COUNTER
              SAND
            FRACTION,
             STORED
SILT AND CLAY
  FRACTION,
 KEPONE ANAL.
    < 63u
Figure 1.  Scheme for laboratory processing of bed sediments.
                           - 5 -

-------
Moncure and Nichols (1968), Standard Methods (1973) and Folk

(1961).  Details are given in laboratory instructions on file at

VIMS sedimentological lab.  Figure 1 summarizes steps in labora-

tory processing.


 5.  Results and Their Significance.

Spatial Variability.  A special study of variations in kepone

concentrations in bulk bed sediment over a small spatial range

uas conducted at two selected stations:  (1) station 15 in lower

reaches near Wreck Shoal with 3 m water depth and (2) station

40a in middle reaches at buoy 62 with 6 m water depth.  At sta-

tion 15, four samples were taken at random from the top <: 2 cm

of sediment and of the top < 15 cm of sediment, all from the

same grab.  Table 1 lists the results.  Spatial variations within

the 0.05 m2 area of the grab are relatively small with standard

deviations less than + 7 percent.


Table 1.  Variation in kepone concentrations in the top < 2 cm
          and the top <- 15 cm of sediment from a single grab;
          station 15,  June 15, 1977.
Depth Interval     Kepone, ppm

    0-2 cm            0.026
                      0.025            Mean
                      0.029           Range
                      0.026        Std. Dev,

    0-6 cm    •        0.012            Mean
                      0.013           Ranse
0.027
0.025 - 0.029
+ .002 (+ 7%)

0.013
0.012 - 0.013
+ .001 (+ 8%)
                      0.013        Std. Dev.

     At station 40a one sample was taken of the top < 2 cm of sed-

iment from 10 successive grabs.  The grabs were obtained at random
                            - 6 -

-------
waile the vessel drifted over distances of 225 m downstream and

135 m upstream from the station.  Results of the sampling and

analyses (Table 2) indicate a very wide range of values within a

distance less than 230 m.  Despite the low bottom relief and small

textural differences of the sediment at the site, kepone concen-

trations ranged as much as 0.41 ppm.  When surface samples were

taken at random from 12 successive grabs at the same station,

number 40a, (Table 2) (an anchor station with an area of about

200 ms) the kepone concentrations ranged 0.47 ppm with a standard

deviation of 44 percent.
Table 2.
Spatial variation in kepone concentrations from the
top < 2 cm of sediment of successive grabs at station
40a, July 5, 1977 (drift station) and July 20, 1977
(anchor station).            .  /
            Drift Station
Downstream
225 m
0.062
0.074
0.081
0.067
0.096
0.110
0.130
0.340
0.360
0.470
Upstream
135 m
0.021
0.025
0.029
0.023
0.017
0.013
0.027
0.033
0.029
0.023
    Mean
   Range
Std. Dev.
             Mean
            Range
         Std. Dev.

 0.179
 0.062 - 0.470
 + 0.151 (+ 84%)
                              0.024
                              0.013 - 0.033
                              0.006 (25%)
    Mean
   Range
Std. Dev,
                Anchor
                Station

                 0.27
                 0.17
                 0.44
                 0.21
                 0.14
                 0.27
                 0.33
                 0.39
                 0.34
                 0.61
                 0.61
                 0.28
0.338
0.14 - 0.61
+ 0.153 (+ 44%)
                            -  7 -

-------
The narked variations are partly due to the sampling process

whereby some surface sediment is necessarily washed in the grab

or disturbed at depth.  However, most local variations are

inherent in the bed sediments which are affected by variations

in scour and fill, variations in texture and organic matter.

Such variations define rather broad limits which may be placed

on the kepone distribution as a function of location.  They

affect "seasonal" distributions inasmuch as the navigational

capability of relocating a station is no better than a circle

130 m in diameter.

Distribution of Kepone in Surface Sediments.  The sediments from

middle reaches are the most contaminated.  As shown in Figure 2,
                                          f
average kepone concentrations in bulk bed sediments from the

channel (:> 4 m depth) are higher between mile 38 and 52 than

near the source (mile 63) or farther seaward in the estuary.

This is the zone of the turbidity maximum which lies landward

of the inner limit of salt intrusion.  Suspended sediment con-

centrations in this zone are higher than elsewhere most of the

year.

     When longitudinal distributions of kepone are compared for

surveys in December 1976, March 1977, and July 1977, there are

no significant trends with time.  Instead the concentrations

are relatively stable within a range of about 0.10 ppm.  How-

ever,  the average levels of concentration from December 1976

through July 1977 in middle reaches (0.15 ppm) are generally



                            - 8 -

-------
 0.3
ex

LJ
S
O
o_
LU O.I
                TURBIDITY     !
                  MAXIMUM  ZONE
                                40            '20
                             DISTANCE LANDWARD,miles
MOUTHED
    Figure 2.  Longitudinal distribution of average kepone  concentrations
              in bed sediments from the channel of the James Estuary;
              mean of December 1976,  March and July 1977 values.
                                 - 9 -

-------
                                            O.I %o SALINITY
                                Jamestown  /  (average)
OURCE
                 TURBIDITY MAXIMUM
                 <	ZONE  	>
                                             Warwick
                                               River/>.20ppm
                                                           Newport
                                                             News
                                 0 .1 0 -.2 0
                                       ppm
KEPOIJE
              SEDIMENTS
                                 .06-.10
OTTOM
                                                          7 Hampton
                                                          '
                                              03-.06
       JAMES    ESTUARY
                                                     <.03
                                                         ppm
             Figure 3.  Horizontal distribution of average kt-ponc- conccntriit
                    J ., 1	1 „ ,.,1

-------
lower than those measured earlier by VIMS in September 1976 and



by the Corps of Engineers in January 1976 when concentrations



were 0.27 to 0.48 ppm.



     The zone of high sediment contamination covers both channels



and contiguous shoals.  As shown in plan view, Figure 3, aver-



age concentrations are higher in the reach between Jamestown and



Weyanoke than elsewhere.  The highest average concentration is



in sediment from a shoal off Dancing Point.  Elsewhere, concen-



trations are locally high off mouths of tributary creeks such as



Bailey's Creek near the kepone source, Chippokes Creek, The



Thorofare, Jamestown and the Warwick River.  Substantial con-



centrations, ranging 0.66 to 1.20 ppm, are found in Burwell Bay.



However, concentrations are relatively 'low in narrowed reaches



around Hog Point.  Kepone content generally diminishes seaward



from Burx^ell Bay to Hampton Roads where concentrations are less



than 0.010 ppm.  Twelve sediment samples from lower Chesapeake



Bay in September 1977 all had concentrations less than 0.010 ppm.



Distribution of Kepone at Depth in Sediments.  Contamination of



bed sediments in zones of natural fill (undredged) extends to



about 40 cm below the bed surface (Figure 4).  Greatest contam-



ination, often exceeding 0.50 ppm, occurs at depths of 10 to



20 cm below the surface.  However, in cores from shoals in the



shipping channel where sedimentation is locally fast (i.e., 30a),



concentrations increase downward to a depth of 60 to 80 cm.  This



trend reflects the diminished supply of kepone-rich sediment with







                            - 11 -

-------
  KEPONE  IN  SEDIMENT
         CORES
                             DEPTH  KEPONE-*
                               o	o i  ot  0-3 ppm
        ppm
    0  O.I 0.2 03
   30
   cm
   40

   60!
SPOIL
                                                   CHANNEL
                                                    FILL

                                                   UNDREDGED
                                       NATURAL
                                         FILL
Figure 4.  Depth distribution of kepone in cores from selected sites.
                            -  12 -

-------
time since the Summer of 1975.  Kepone content of old dredged



material decreases slightly with depth (i.e., cores 41a, 30b,



1.9-7.5).  The depth trend results from mixing of sediment dur-



ing dredging and disposal.  The contaminated sediment is most



likely mixed and "diluted" by uncontaminated sediment and thus



reduces the overall concentration.



     A few samples from the Jamestown-Daneing Point reach collected



in May 1967 showed dec table amounts of kepone (.038 and .018 ppm).



Although the content is low, the samples suggest that the life



span of kepone in the sediments is at least 10 years.



State of Xepone in Sediments.  The concentrations of kepone are



orders of magnitude greater in the bed sediments than dissolved in



estuary water.  An indication of the states of kepone storage in



the sediments is gained by examining its relation to percent^clay



content, mean particle size and organic content.



     Finer-grained sediments are generally the most contaminated.



A plot of mean grain size versus kepone concentrations throughout



the estuary (Figure 5a) shows a great deal of scatter.  Likewise



a plot of percent clay content versus kepone concentrations varies



widely (Figure 5b).   Part of the scatter results from the great



variation in textural types throughout the estuary whereas kepone



content partly varies in relation to its source.  When kepone



content of samples from a single reach of the estuary is considered,



however, there is a trend for higher kepone content in the fine-



grained sediment with high clay content.
                           - 13 -

-------
020
0 16
0.12
e
1 CL
CL
h-*
•F-
1 g 0 08
CL
0.04
0
*
• *
• *
•
t

*






•





-
A





-

*
.
•
•
•
* • •
	 	 y • • • - -
•
••

''
X
t
*





-
B
*
020
0.16
0.12
0.08
0.04
. 0
-
-
"


•
. « *
	 • "'"• 1 	 ' 	 T ' " 	 ,...—.... . . 1
. .
• ! 	 '•
t •
* * *
• j
	 1 	 j 	 i 	 	 — 	
               MEAN PARTICLE SIZE
                   80
             % CLAY
                                                                 100
         2       4        6
         % ORGANIC MATTER
igures 5a.  Kepone content versus
            mean particle size.
5b.  Kepone content versus
     percent clay content.
5c.  Kepone content versus
     organic matter indicated
     by loss on ignition.

-------
     There is a distinct trend of increasing kepone content with



increasing organic content.  As shown in Figure 5c, organic-rich



sediments have higher kepone content than sediments with low



organic content.  As expected, samples landward from the kepone



source or from zones of scour, display wide scatter.  The trend



indicates kepone prefers organic matter, either adsorbed on



detrital particles or ingested when the organic matter was pro-



duced.  As organic matter slowly decomposes in the sediment,



there is an opportunity for kepone to escape into interstitial



or overlying water.





 6.  Discussion.



Sedimentary Sinks for Kepone.  The James Estuary is an environ-



ment where much river-borne sediment accumulates.  Zones of



active deposition may be expected to be areas of. relatively high



sediment contamination.  On the other hand, zones where the bed



is scoured into older sediment or zones where river-borne sedi-



ments are by-passed, are zones of relatively low contamination.



Inasmuch as sedimentary processes are relatively slow, deposi-



tion sites are indicators of  long-term processes.  They are an



end product of short-term variations induced by local wave and



current transport.



     Kepone contamination is generally greatest in sites of active



sedimentation:  (1) the Jamestown-Daneing Point reach which is



also the site of the turbidity maximum, (2) Burwell Bay, and



(3) tributary creek mouths.   Zones of sedimentation have been







                            - 15 -

-------
cr.
i
                                                 JAMES  ESTUARY
                                                    V;ZH\\V^
SEDIMENTATI
RATE
            DEEPENING     SHOALING
                PER 70 YRS.      PER 70 YRS.
                   THAN IM.'   '
               -LESS THAN I M.

                    SPOIL
              -GREATER THAN 2

              CHANNEL
                                   40 DISTANCE UPSTREAM.Km.
  r
Figure 6.  Sedimentation rates in  the James Estuary based on water
         depth changes over 70 years, from Nichols (1972).

-------
delineated in a former study (Nichols, 1972)  (Figure 6)  from



differences in water depths over 35 and 70 years.   The rates of



sedimentation within the zones probably change with time but



the sites of deposition persist.



     Kepone concentrations are locally high off the mouth of



Bailey's Creek, the kepone source.  Hoxvever,  the main distribu-



tion does not display decreasing concentrations with distance



atfay from the source.  Instead, the main sink is in the middle



estuary, the zone of the turbidity maximum where suspended



sediments are trapped and deposited.  Sediments in this zone



are finer-grained than elsewhere, less than 8u mean size.  Clay



content in this zone is also higher than elsewhere in the



estuary.



Routes of Transport.  From the sedimentation patterns, kepone



distributions and existing hydraulic knowledge of the James, it



is possible to sketch the probable route of kepone-sediment



transport.  Both the source of kepone and the major source of



suspended sediment come from the same direction, landward or



upstream of the estuary.  Since the influx of sediment from



Bailey's Creek is very small in proportion to the influx of



sediment from the main river, it is probable the kepone was



mainly introduced in the dissolved form and bound to suspended



sediment from the main river.  Since the estuary is fresh above



Jamestown most of the year, net transport from Hopewell to



Jamestown is directed seaward.  When suspended sediment reaches






                            - 17 -

-------
the Jamestown area,  transport is slowed down because net velocity



approaches zero in the null zone at the salt intrusion head.   The



null zone acts as a dynamic barrier that restricts seaward trans-



pDrt of river-borne suspended sediment carried near the bottom.




Only sedLnent carried near the surface is transported farther seaward



through the upper layer.   If this sediment settles downward,  it



is carried back upstream to the null zone by landward density



currents through the lower estuarine layer.  However,  sediment



carried over the shoals may escape the estuary through the upper



layer especially during floods like Agnes.  Nonetheless, the  bulk



of the sediment load is trapped landward of the null zone.  As



a tracer of sediment,  kepone supports this^fact.  Most kepone



concentrations are located in or above the null zone and they.



persist with time, both over the short-term, 8 months of sampling,



and over the long-term as demonstrated from the distributions at



dspth in cores.  The data indicate that it will take a long time,



many years, to reduce levels of kepone in the sediment by natural



processes of decay and dispersal.  Part of the kepone will be



buried by "new" sediment but the most significant reduction will



come by "dilution" with uncontaminated  sediment introduced during



freshets and floods.  This trend has already started on the floor



of the shipping channel where sedimentation is locally fast.
                            - 13 -

-------
              KKPON1-: WATiCR-SKDIMKNT KLUTKLATHS





     Many pollutants have an affinity to sediments which is goverru d



by the surface charges on particles.  This is particularly true for



some of the trace metals - such as zinc - with the clay mineral



portion of the sediments.  The magnitudes of the surface charges are



affected by pH and salinity (Parks, 1967).  Therefore, it was necessa



to determine if Kepone behaved in a similar manner because, in the



James River, both the estuarine and the tidal fresh water portions



with their wide ranges of pH and salinity were contaminated by the



pesticide.  As well the distribution of Kepone in the bottom sediment;



of the James show a marked increase in that portion usually in the



vicinity of the freshwater - saltwater interface.  At this boundary



the waters change from fresh, (salinity <0.5^) to saline, (salinities



0.5'' to 20 - 25^).  Also in this region the pH of the water increases



from near 7 to 8 due to the buffering capacity of seawater.  With



these abrupt changes in pH and salinity coinciding with the change



in Kepone concentration, it appeared possible that fresh water



sediments, highly contaminated with the pesticide, were being "ex-



tracted" by estuarine waters as they traversed this boundary pro-



gressing seaward or that Kepone in solution was not adsorbed by



sediments in saline waters.  Therefore, experimsnts were conducted



in the laboratory to determine the extractibility of sediment-Kepone



by waters with varying ranges of salinity and pH.



     The experimental design included two phases.  The first phase



was to determine the accuracy and precision of the analysis of water



for dissolved Kepone and the second phase was to determine the amount



of Kepone removed from contaminated freshwater sediments by waters



with pH's ranging from 6 to 9 and salinities of <0.5^> and

-------
These  ranges of pH's and salinities bracket those found in the



James  River.



Phase  I, Water-Kepone Analysis



     The mechod utilized for the Kepone-water extraction was one



developed by The Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle



Park (1975) .  It involves liquid extraction using benzene as the



organic solvent.  The extractions are carried out in seperatory



funnels with 3 successive treatments of the same water with benzene



at a ratio of 1:10 benzene to water.  The extracts are combined and



then dried by passing them through anhydrous sodium sulfate.  The



combined extracts are then analyzed by electron capture gas chroma-



tography.



     To check the efficiency and accuracy of the procedure, Kepone



free water, (obtained either from Kepone noncontaminated estuaries



such as the York or from laboratory deion.ize'fl-double distilled



stocks), was spiked with known amounts of Kepone, extracted -and



analyzed (Table I).



Phase  II, Water Extraction of Kepone From Sediments.



     The experimental design for this phase involved subjecting



Kepone contaminated sediments from the James River, obtained from



the fresh water portion, near Hopewell, to waters with varying pH's



and salinities.  The salinities were either fresh, (0.06^), obtained



from the James River or saline, (19.57'), gotten from the mouth of



the York River at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science's facility.



The pH's of these waters were adjusted to the desired levels by



addition of either reagent grades of hydrochloric acid or sodium



hydroxide.



     After the desired pH and salinity were achieved, a portion of



wet sediment (100 g   ) was placed in a flask and the water (250 ml) w;

-------
added and the mixture was agitated with a Wrist-Action Shaker for
1 hr.  Following this the sediments were separated by centrifugation
and the supernatant water was extracted for dissolved Kepone by the
method previously described in the Phase I section of this report.
     In all, 36 separate extraction were analyzed and the resulting
water Kepone concentrations were compared to that in the exposed
sediments.  The comparisons are reported as the percent removed by
a water of a given pH and salinity in Table II.
Discussion:
     The data from Phase I clearly show that the Benzene method of
extracting Kepone from water yields approximately 85fv or better of
the amount of the pesticide from solutions spiked at 1 ppb to 10 ppb.
However, at concentrations below 1 ppb the efficiency drops greatly •
for instance, 64>? yield at 0.5 ppb.  These yields can be used to
judge the accuracy obtained for Kepone analyses of water by this
method.  The precision estimates can be seen from the standard" devia-
tions which show + 14^ or better for spiked solutions of 1 to 10 ppb,
The precision of the method for concentrations of 0.5 ppb are in the
same range which suggests that a portion of the "spike" may be
sorbed to the walls of the glassware or lost by some other means.
     Attempts were made to try solvents other than benzene, for
extraction, (ethyl acetate - toluene, methylene chloride) but with
the similar results - dissolved Kepone at concentrations less than
1 ppb may be 100" in error.
     Since only at the 10 ppb Kepone concentration were the effect
varying salinities on the analysis compared, it is risky to judge
salinity effects on the method.  Evenso, there is no obvious effect
using natural waters of 0.06 and 19.5^>.
                              -  3  -

-------
     The extraction experiments, the results of which are given

in  Table II and Figure I, show that there is no apparent affect

of either salinity or pH, within the ranges used which approximate

those found in the James River, on the extractibility of Kepone

from sediments by water.  It must be kept in mind,  however,  that

the amounts of Kepone extracted were in the tenths  of ppb range.

Since the analytical methodology is less than ideal at these con-

centrations some differences could go undetected.  Figure I shows

that all results are within 2 standard errors of each other which

implies no difference at the 95'.- confidence interval.

     The data indicate that, if the analyses are correct, the

partitioning coefficient of Kepone from sediment to wafer is approx-

imately 6 x 10" , irrespective of natural ranges of pH and salinity.

It follows then, that the relatively high concentrations of Kepone
                                            f
at the fresh water-salt water interface and upstream are likely due

to the turbidity maximum (mentioned in the sediment section) rather

than chemical factors such as partitioning.
                            - 4 -

-------
                          References


Environmental Protection Agency, 1975,  Preliminary Report on
     Kepone levels from Hopewell,  Va area.  Briefing at Research
     Triangle Park, North Carolina

Parks, G. A., 1967. Aqueous Surface Chemistry of Oxides and Complex
     Oxide Minerals:  Equilibrium Concepts  in Natural Water Systems,
     p. 121-160.  In Gould, F.  (Ed), Advances in Chemistry, Series
     67.  American Chemical Society Publications.

-------
                TABLE I

Extraction Efficiencies of Kepone from
      Water by the Benzene Method
Salinity
0%, Deionized H00
ii *•
it
1 1
it
it
u
it
11
M
It
II
II
II
It
It
It
It
It
II
II
11
II
It
II
II
II
0.067. James R. HoO
it
ti
u
M
it
u
Adjusted
PH
7.0
M
u
H
u
M
II
II
tl
II
It
II
II
M
It
It
II
It
II
It
II
11
11
It
II
It
M
7.0
u
ti
M
i ,
ii
it
Spiked
Keoone Concentration
lOppb
u
5ppb
it
it
u
ti
Ippb
ii
M
M
tt
II
It
" - /
II
II
It
O.Sppm
u
II
It
II
II
II
II
II
lOppb
u
it
u
u
M
ii
7o Recovery
967.
997.
877.
907.
787o
94%
957o
977.
• 727o
937.
697.
93%
56%
102%
85%
86%
- 967.
83%
72%
51%
67%
71%
67%
55%
80%
4S%
69%
86%
99%
92%
85%
83%
77%
76%

-------
["A.  J I (continued)
Adjusted
Salinity pH
19.5% Ycrk R. H90 8.0
n *• M
M ii
n ii
n n
ti ii
n n
Spiked
Kepone Concentration
lOppb
11
•'
"
"
n
% Recovery
7-4%
85%
73%
99%
74%
103%
9970

-------
TABLE I
Summary
Adjusted Spiked
Salinity pH Keoone Concentration
Deionized + Distilled 7.0 lOppb
5ppb
Ippb
O.Sppb
1.06% James River H20 7.0 lOppb
i.5% York River HO 8.0 lOppb


Average yield
And Standard dev
98 + 2%
89 + 7%
85 + 147,
64 + 11%
85 + 8%
87 + 13%

-------
                             Elutriate Results
S n H n 1 ty
  II

  II

  II

  I!

  II

  II

  II

  II

  II
(Sediment
 pH
             6.0
              n
7.0
 it
ppm Kepone)
 '/•_ Re-moved

  0.04J
  0,06/ji?
  0.11
  0.11
  0.09
  0.12
  '0.01
  0.07
  0.06
  0.06
  0.11

                               STD.  ERROR - 0.01
                               0.05  + 0.01;^ of total Kepone in
                               sediment recovered at a pH 6.0 H
                               0 . 06'/',
                               0.03  + 0.04"- of total Kepone ir.
                               sediment recovered at a oil 7.0
                               + 0.06,'

                               STANDARD ERROR 0.01
  II

  II
             8.0
              Tt

              II
9.0
              0.06
              0.09
              0.09
  0.05
  0.06
                               0.08 + .02,^ of total Kepone  in
                               sediment recovered at pH 8.0 +
                               0.06^

                               STANDARD ERROR 0.01
                                 .   X

                               0.06 + 0.01" of total-Kepone in
                               sediment recovered at pH 9.0 +
                               0.06,"

                               STANDARD ERROR 0.005
19.51.
5.0


6.0
              0.03
                            0.04
                            0.06
                            0.03
                   0.03  + ?  ,
                               0.04 + 0.02" of total Kepone  in
                               sediment recovered at pH 6 +
                               19. 5>

                               STANDARD ERROR 0.009
             7.0
              0.02
              0.07
              0.04
                   STANDARD ERROR 0.015
                   0.04  + 0.03".'  of total Kepone  in
                   sediment recovered at pH 7 &  19.'

-------
it
it
8.0
 it
           M

           II

           II

           It
               0.09
               0.06
               0.05
               0.06
              <0.01
               0.05
               0.04
               0.06
               0.02
               0.05
                               0.05 + 0.02;:-  of  total Kepone
                               in secTiment recovered at pH
                               8.0 + 19.5",

                               STANDARD ERROR 0.007
II

II

II
9.0
           M
              0.07
              0.05
              0.03
0.05 + 0.02,"  of  total Kepone
in secTiment  recovered at pH
9 + 19. 5>
                                         STANDARD ERROR 0.012

-------
o

£.10
o
UJ
  .02
JAMES RIVER  SEDIMENTS


  Extracted with water
              #


Av.±2 std errors
                           I
                             • 0 salinity

                             -- I9.5%o
                    7     8
                      PH

-------
        U1TAKK OF  KKPONK  i'KOM  SUSi'KNUKi)  SKIHMICNTS
              BY OYSTERS,  RANG IA  AND  MACQMA
                        Introduction


          Laboratory studies on the uptake of Kepone from

sediments in suspension by bottom-dwelling organisms were

undertaken by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at

Gloucester Point, Virginia on December 1, 1976.  The first

two months were spent in acquisition and preparation of

laboratory equipment and space for the experiments.

          In the period of time since then, three series of

laboratory experiments were conducted with three species of

bivalves.  Eight experiments were completed with the oyster

Crassostrea virginica, five with the clam Rangia cuneata and

one with the clam Macoma balthica.  Most of these experiments

involved exposure of the animals to contaminated sediments

in suspension.  In ;:wo of them, however, the animals were

placed in a bed of contaminated sediments with uncontaminated

river water flowing over them.

          This repo;:t presents the results of three series

of experiments followed by a discussion.



                    Materials and Methods


Apparatus

          A diagram of the basic arrangement of the apparatus

used to conduct the:>e experiments is shown on Figure 1.  The

units labelled A through D were used only during the first

series of experiments when ambient river water temperature

was below 10 C most of the time.  York River water was piped

-------
                             -2-
into a constantly-overflowing box (A)  from which it was




pumped through heat exchangers (C)  into a rectangular cas-




cading trough (D).   The latter served to allow bubbles



created by the escape of dissolved gases to dissipate before




reaching the animal trays.  This section of the system was




not used in the last two series of experiments when river




water temperatures were above 10 C.  Then, York River water




was piped directly Into a rectangular trough  (E) which was




suspended from the ceiling directly above the wet table



that held the experimental trays.  Water depth in the trough



was maintained at 20 cm by a drain standpipe of that height.



          Water to supply the experimental trays was siphoned




out of trough E with plastic tubing.  In the first series




of experiments wate;: flow rates were controlled by inserting



glass flounneters (F) in the tubing siphons ahead of the



mixing chambers (I),  In the last two series of experiments



the flowmeters were omitted.  Instead, flows were regulated



by the bore size of the plastic tubing used for siphons.



This eliminated constrictions in the tubing caused by adjust-



able clamps which enhanced flow interruptions due to clogging.



Siphons were cleaned daily and flow measurements made before




and after the siphons were cleaned.



          Water from the siphons entered a rectangular mixing




chamber made of acrylic plastic  (I), 25 cm in length, 16  cm




in width and 14 cm in height, through a smaller chamber  (2 cm




long, 3.5 cm wide and 14 cm high).  The smaller chamber was



connected to the larger one by a circular opening with a  2 cm

-------
                             -3-
diameter.  Contaminated sediment suspensions also entered



the mixing chamber through the same small chamber.  Stock



suspensions were kept well mixed in flasks  (H) by magnetic



stirrers (J).   They were metered into the mixing chamber at




a constant rate by peristaltic pumps  (G).



          River water and sediment suspensions were mixed




in the mixing chamber by magnetic stirrers.  Observation



showed that the mixing was complete before  the mixture  flowed



cut of the mixing c.namber.  Sedimentation in the chamber



was negligible.  The diluted sediment suspensions flowed into




the experimental trays  (K) through a  standpipe located  at  the




end opposite to the one through which water and sediments




entered  the chamber.  The system set  up  was the same  for



trays holding control animals except  for elimination  of




components G and H.



          In experiments with the clam  Rangia cuneata,  York




River water salinit/ was reduced to between 5 and 6/00  by



addition of fresh ground water pumped from  a  shallow  veil.



A  second rectangular trough  (P) was suspended below  the one



receiving York River water  (E).  York River water was siphoned




 (Q) from trough E into  trough P.  Fresh  water was also  piped



into a cascading trough similar to D  to  eliminate gas bubbles




generated, by the change in pressure the  ground water  was




subjected; to before it  flowed into trough P.  Water  of  the



resulting; lower salinity was  then siphoned  into the  trays




holding  I'angia clarr.s following the same  system setup  labelled




F  through K in Figure x.

-------
          Figure 2 shows a partial view of the apparatus




used in the series of experiments.



          A system of sediment traps was used -co insure




that no contaminated sediments from our experiments escaped



into the floor drain which emptied into the York River.  The




first component was the wet table on which the experimental




trays were set (L in Figure 1).  A standpipe about 2.5 cm




high inserted in the drain hole of the wet table converted




the table into a sediment trap.  A plastic circular tank (50



cm high and 30 cm in diameter) received water from the wet



table through a pipe reaching.close to the bottom.  The



tank overflowed near its top into a series of three rectangular




boxes (114 cm long and 25 cm wide), each with a 15 cm high



standpipe overflow.  The third box overflowed into the floor




drain.  The sediments and other excess solids obtained in




the experiments wero collected in carboys for disposal.








Experimental Trays



          Two types of trays were used to hold experimental




animals.  In most experiments, a  tray made of acrylic plastic




49 cm long, 26 cm wide, and 8 cm  high, were used.  The over-




flow end was 6 cm high and that also was the depth of the




water in the tray.  This tray was not compartmentalized and




the animals laid directly on  the  bottom  (Figure 3).




          A larger  acrylic plastic tray, 81 cm long, 54 cm




wide and 8 cri deep was used in the third series of experiments




to hold oysters whose biodeposits were collected.  A baffle

-------
                             -5-
at the overflow end of the tray maintained water level at



a depth of 6.5 cm.   These trays were divided into 25 compart-



ments by plastic strips 2.5 cm high.  Each compartment held




cne oyster.  The compartments facilitated separation and




collection of biodeposits.








Eiodeposits



          Biodeposits produced by oysters receiving contaminated




s.ediments in suspension in the large trays were collected



every day with a bulb pipette.  The aggregates collected at




the end of each weexly period were  then analyzed for Kepone.




Every tiir.e biodeposits were collected, sediments settling




out by gravity in the same tray were also collected and the



weekly accumulation also  analyzed for Kepone contents.  Each



day, after biodeposits and sediments had been collected,



every compartment was cleaned of any remaining sediments.








Animals Buried In Mad



          A modification  to the manner usually used to expose



ctnimals to contaminated sediments,  i.e., by  flowing sediment




suspensions over th2m, was introduced in the third  series




of experiments.  Oysters  and  Rangia were buried partially




and  fully, respectively,  in beds of contaminated sediments




held in the smaller of the trays described  above  (Figure  4).



The  sediment bed was  4 to 5 cm deep.  It was made up of




unsieved  sediments from the same batch used  in simultaneous




experiments with flowing  suspended  sediments.

-------
                             -6-
          Oysters were pressed into the sediments at about


a 30° ancle.   Up to one-third of their height was below the


sediment surface level.   The valve area over the gills pro-


truded above  the sediment surface.  Rangia were pressed into


the mud so that almost the whole animal was below the sedi-


ment surface  level.  Within several hours they had buried


themselves fully into the sediment so that only their siphons


showed.  Water flowing over the animals and the sediment


bed had no sediments added to it and was approximately two


to three cm deep.




Source of Experimental Animals


          The animals used were obtained from areas -to be

              p
free of Kepone".  Rangia and Macoma were collected from the


Fappahannock  River ,a.nd oysters came from the Piankatank


River.  All three species were acclimated to the experimental


temperatures  and salinities under flowing-water conditions


at least one  week prior to use.  Analysis before start of


each experiment showed them to be free of contamination


with KeponeR.





Preparation of Sediment Suspension


          Figure 5 presents a flow chart outline of the steps


taken in preparation of Kepone^ contaminated sediment suspensions


All contaminated sediments were collected with a sediment


grab sampler  at Jordan Point, in the James River at Hopewell


and represented the top 6 cm of the bottom.  They were trans-

-------
                             -7-
ported to the laboratory in 2 or 3 large plastic bags each



containing about 20 kg of material.  The contents of each




bag was mixed and transferred to smaller bags in fractions



of approximately SCO ml in volume.  The smaller bags were




stored in a freezer until needed.  Only sediments collected




on the Scime date were used in any one series of experiments.




          When needed, a bag of sediments was thawed, mixed




with well water and shaken mechanically in flasks for 12




hours or more.  The sediments were then wet-sieved through



a 63 u arid the resulting suspension diluted up to 70.GO ml



with well water.  This volume was labelled as stock suspension




cind giver, an identification number.  It was maintained in




suspension by continuous agitation with a magnetic stirrer




and bar.  Subsequently, to insure homogeneity in dosage,




it was divided into measured portions by alternately siphoning



a small volume into each of six containers and repeating the



cycle until each container had been filled to the desired



volume.




          The samples in two of the containers, with volumes



of approximately 403 and 200 ml, were used to determine the



concentration of Kepone in the suspension and the dry weight



per unit volume of the sediments in the suspension, respectively,




The suspension in the other four containers, usually with




volumes of 1200 and 1600 ml, was the material to be introduced




into the trays holding experimental animals.  The suspensions




in the four containers were diluted in a ratio of 1:4, and



pumped into the mixing chambers.

-------
                             -8-
Sampling of Animals_j.n Trays

          Samples of the animals were analyzed for Kepone

at the start of each experiment and at approximately weekly

intervals thereafter for the four-weeks duration of the

experiment.  Each sample consisted usually of three or four

animals and at times of up to eight individuals in the case

of oysters and Rangia..  In the case of Ma coma the number

ranged between seven and fifteen.  The shell of each animal

was carefully scrubbed after removal from the tray.



Kepone Analysis

          Analysis of all samples  from concentration of

Kepone were done by personnel of the Department of Ecology

and Pollution in their laboratories.  The method used was

soxhlet extraction, fluorosil cleanup and electron-capture

gas croir,,atography.



Determination of Kepone Concentration in  Sediments

           The concentration  of  Kepone in  the  diluted  sediment

suspension  flowing  over the  experimental  animals was  deter-

mined by  computation  of the  product  of  four  factors:


                    Kc =  (sc)  (kc)  (dl}  (d2}

where

           KC  =  computed Kepone  concentration  in  diluted
                suspension,  in  ppb

           SG  *  sediment dry  weight per  unit  volume  in
                stock  suspension,  in  Kg/1

           k  «=  Kepone concentration  determined analytically

-------
          d,  = factor by which stock suspension was diluted
               prior to being pumped into mixing chambers.

          d  = factor by which the suspension being pumped
               into mixing chambers was diluted; determined
               by the flow rate at which it was being pumped
               and the flow rate of York River water flowing
               simultaneously into the mixing chamber.

          The factor &2 was controlled in each experiment by

selection of  perist.altic pump settings that would deliver

a desired flow rate, of the sediment suspension into the mixing

chamber.  The flow of river water into the mixing chamber

was also adjusted t.o the desired rate.  Flow of river water

was maintained relatively constant while the flow rate of

contaminated  sediments was adjusted so that trays would

receive sediment suspensions at different rates.

          Some trays received what was labelled as low

concentrations of sediment (and, therefore, also of Kepone)

while others  received medium and high concentrations.

Throughout an experiment the ratio between low, medium and

high concentrations remained fairly constant even though

Kepone concentrations in stock suspensions were variable.

As a result,  the concentrations labelled as low were always

significantly lower than those labelled medium or high.  The

separation of low concentrations from medium and high ones

is the main distinction made between concentrations in this

report.



Preparation of Data for Analysis

          In the coarse of one series of experiments between

30 and 40 different stock suspensions  (500 ml bags) were used.

-------
                            -10-
Scdirr.ent concentration and Kepone concentration varied from




one stock suspension to another.  Consequently, the experi-



mental animals in any one tray were not being exposed to a



constant concentration of Kepone during the time they were



held in the trays.  However, throughout the duration of an




experiment, the ratio between low, medium and high concentrations




remained fairly constant.  As an aid in interpretation of




results, a weighted mean hourly concentration was computed



for each of the weekly periods as the sum of the products



of the concentration in each stock suspension and the length




of time (in hours) that particular suspension was used,




divided by the total number of hours in the weekly period.




Included in these computations, were short intervals during




which, for a variety of reasons, no sediments were being



added to the water flowing over the animals.  These intervals



were usually few and anywhere from 15 min to 2 hour in




duration.  Also involved was a  final interval of eight to



nine hours at the end of a weekly period when the animals



only received river water to allow them to eliminate material




held in their digestive tract.



          Despite the mixing done before the sediment sample




i-'as divided into 500 ml fractions, differences in sediment




and Kepone concentrations from  one stock to another were




sometimes large.  "hus, differences of significant magnitude




were encountered sometimes between the mean hourly concentrations



for the different weekly periods in one experiment.  Since



there was a high correlation between the concentration of

-------
                            -11-
Kepone in oyster meats and its concentration in the sediments,



and to eliminate the effect of the variations between stock



suspensions, the values for oyster meats were normalized



by re-computation based on the mean hourly concentration of



Kepone in the sediments over the approximately four-weeks



duration of experiment.  The new values represent the con-



centration of Kepor.,e expected in oyster meats if the con-



centration in sediments was constant.  The normalized values



were computed usinc a proportional equation.




                          Results



      Fourteen uptake  experiments were  completed  between



February  and Augus : 1977.   Eight with  the  oyster Crassostrea



virginica,  five wi':h  the  wedge  clam  Rangia cuneata  and one



with  the  clara Macoina  baltihlca.   In all but two of these,  the



animals were exposed  to  suspended contaminated sediments  in



flowing water.   In  the ot:her  two, oysters  and Rang la were



 exposed  to contaminated  .sediments by partial or  total  burial



 in an undisturbed bed in a tray.



      Exposure  periods consisted of approximately one to four



 weeks.  Kepone  concentrations in the sediment suspension were



 computed for each weekly period and  for each of the progressively



 longer periods  that represented the  total duration of  exposure.



      Kepone levels  in the sediment  suspensions were classified



 as low,  medium  and  high  as labels of convenience.  The mean



 hourly concentration  for each weekly period in experiments where



 levels were classified as low ranged between 0.020 and 0.058 ppb



 (Tables  1-3).   In experiments where  levels were classified as

-------
medium and high, mean hourly concentrations ranged between



0.040 and 0.153 ppm.



     Mean hourly concentrations for the total duration of



exposure (one, two, three or four weeks) in experiments where



levels vere classified as low ranged between 0.027 and 0.058 ppb



(Tables 4 and 5).  In experiments where levels were classified



as medium or high the range of mean hourly concentration was



between 0.057 and 0.153 ppb.



     Results are presented separately for each of the three



bivalve species.  No data are presented for the Kepone concen-



tration in animals; examined before the start of each experiment



or for control animals because in every case they were under the



level of detectabllity of the analytical procedure.





Crassostrea virginica



     Figures 6-8 show the concentration of Kepone in oysters



examined at weekly intervals after exposure to contaminated



sediments in suspension in three series of experiments.   The



values in parentheses give the mean hourly concentration of



Kepone in the sediments for the xoeekly period that immediately



preceded removal for analysis of that particular sample of oysters



     Results of the first series of experiments showed a uniform



progression in the: concentration of Kepone in oysters with time



(Figure 6).   There: x^as indication that an asymptotic level had



been reached after two weeks.   There also was a clear separation



between the three lines which represented high,  medium and low



concentrations in sediments.   A uniform progression was  also



evident in  the second series of experiments although the

-------
                          - 13 -

absolute concentrations attained in oyster  meats were lower
than in the first series and there was no indication that an
asymptotic level had been reached (Figure 7).  In the third
series there was neither a uniform progression nor suggestion
of an asymptotic level.
     The three sets of lines in Figures 6-8 did not appear
to share a common pattern.  However, they did show that the
higher concentrations in oyster meats were associated with the
higher concentrations in the sediments and vice versa.   When
the values for Kepone concentration in oyster meats in the three
series of experiments (Tables 1-3) were grouped into three classes
according to selected concentration ranges it was found that
the values for Kepone in sediments also separated into three
fairly distinguishable groups with different means.  Eleven
sediment values associated with concentrations in oyster meats
between 0 and 0.10 ppm had a mean of 0.038 ppb (range:  0.020 -
0.098 ppb).   Twelve values for concentration in sediment associ-
ated with concentrations in oyster meats between 0.101 and 0.199
had a mean of 0.058 ppb (range: 0.023 - 0.088 ppb).  Five values
for sediments associated with concentrations in oyster meats of
0.20 ppn or greater had a mean of 0.095 ppb (range:  0.070 - 0.113
ppb).
     A plot  of concentration of Kepone in oyster meats  as a
function of concentration in suspended sediments appears in
Figure 9.   Regression analysis showed a correlation between the
two sets of  data (correlation coefficient = 0.781).
     Having  obtained this correlation,  the values for concentration
in oyster meats were normalized on the basis of a constant,  hourly

-------
                          - 14 -






concentration of Kepone in the sediments.  The mean hourly



concentration of Kepone in sediments for the whole duration



of each experiment  (approximately four weeks) was chosen as



the normalization constant.  The computed means appear in Table 4.



     Plots of the normalized values for oyster meat concentrations



appear in Figure 10 and 11.  The marked dips in meat concentra-



tions after two and three weeks of exposure during the third



series of experiments have been eliminated in the normalized



curves.  The normalized curves suggest that an asymptotic level



is reached after the first week of exposure in that series.



     The curves for the first and second series were slightly



altered by the conversion but the original trends shown were not



appreciably changed.  The curves for the first series still



indicate an asymptotic plateau.  Curves for the second series,



on the ether hand,  still show a trend of increasing concentration



in oyster meats with time.  The high value seen for the third week



in the borken line  for the first period results from a relatively



high value in the meats in the original data while the correspond-



ing value in the suspended sediments was relatively low (medium



concentration,  Table 1).



     There were significant differences in the temperatures at



which the three series of experiments with oysters were conducted



(Table 6).   In  the first  series,  York  River water had to be



heated to raise it to desirable levels.  The minimum and maximum



daily temperatures recorded near the source of our river water



supply for each of the weekly periods included in the experiment



were:   1st week,  3.2-7.6°C;  2nd week,  6.4-10.4°C; 3rd week,




9.0-12.8°C;  and 4th week,  10.0-12.0°C.   Water temperatures in the

-------
                           -  15  -
 cxpe-rimontal  trays  ranged between  14.0  and  21.0°C  during  the
 four weeks  Included, with the average being between  17  and  18°C
 for each of the weekly periods.
     The second and  third series of experiments were conducted at
 ambient temperatures.  These ranged between 18.3 and 25. 7°C
 during the four weeks of the second series  with an average  for
 each week in  the range of 20.9  to  23.5°C  (Table 6).  During
 the third series the overall range was  25.0 to 34.0°C with  the
 weekly average ranging between  26.6 and 29.6°C.
     During the first series of experiments, daily salinities
 ranged between 17.5 and 22.1,^ for  the four  weeks, and the weekly
 average ranged from 18.4 to 20.4,'v  (Table  6).  During the  second
 series, the corresponding salinity ranges were 16.2  - 20.31 and
 17•1-19.4^.  Likewise, the ranges of the  corresponding  averages foi
 the third series were 20.2-23.61- and 20.6-23.1".-.
     One of the experiments in  the third  series involved weekly
 analysis of Kepone concentration in the meats of oysters  that had
 been held partially buried in an undisturbed bed of contaminated
 sediments.   York River water flowing over the sediment bed was
unconta.-ninated by Kepone.   The concentration of Kepone  in the
 sediments forming the bed averaged 1.77 ppm in two samples
analyzed before the oysters were introduced (Table 7).   A mixed
sample from the same tray analyzed after  the oysters were removed
showed a  concentration of 2.89 ppm.   A sample collected  from
the top one centimeter layer of the tray after the oysters were
removed had a  Kepone concentration of 2.24 ppm.
     After  one weak in the sediment bed the Kepone concentration
in two samples of oysters  averaged 0.037 ppm (Table 7).   The

-------
                          - 16 -



concentration in oyster meats decreased gradually during the



next three weeks below the detectability level of the analytical



techniques, i-e_., 0.02 ppm.



     Mean sizes of oysters used in the three experiments appear



in Table 9.  They ranged between 7 and 8 cm in height during the



first and third series of experiments and between 5 and 6 cm in



the second series.



Oyster Biodeposits



     Oysters concentrated Kepone in their biodeposits to levels



thousands of times higher than those found in the suspended



sediments (Table 8).  The concentration factors for.feces ranged



from 11,000 to 55,000.  In pseudofeces, the range was between



3,000 to 20,000.  The concentration in feces was always higher



than that in pseudofeces but the magnitude of the difference varied



considerably between the paired sampled compared.



     Concentration of Kepone in sediments that settled by gravity



in the tray compartments was usually slightly higher than those



in pseudofeces.   However, it was also significantly lower than



that in feces.



Rangia cuneata



     Five experiments were conducted with the wedge clam Rangia



cuneata during the second and third series of experiments.  In



four, animals were exposed to contaminated sediments in suspension



and in one th^y were buried in a bed of contaminated sediments.



     The results obtained for Rangia during the second series



of expeiriments  are almost identical to those obtained for oysters



during the same series (Table 2, Figures 12 and 7).  Most of the



actual values found at any one weekly interval were close and the




line trends are similar.

-------
                           - 17 -






     The data for Rangla in the thrid series of experiments



were sotiex^hat different from those for oysters (Table 3, Figures



13 and 8).  Distribution of the weekly values for Rangia meats



tended t;o remain at approximately the same level after the first



week with a slight dip in the third week samples.  The oyster



data showed a greater vertical displacement of the weekly values.



The data for both animals showed a fairly distinct separation



between the lines for low and high Kepone concentrations in the



sediments.



     Rangia buried in undisturbed contaminated sediments



accumulated Kepone to low levels (Table 7, Figure 13).  After the



first week high of 0.05 ppm there was a gradual decrease with



time to 0.03 ppm after four weeks.  Rangia receiving low concen-



tration:; of Kepone in suspension accumulated slightly more Kepone



than those buried in the sediments even though the latter had a



Kepone concentration several thousand times greater (2 ppm in the



bed sediments vs. 0.02 to 0.06 ppb in the water column).



     Water temperatures in the trays holding Rangia  during the



second series of experiments were slightly lower than during the



third series (Table 6).  The range during the second series was



between 18 and 20°C and during the third series it was between



20 and 22°C.  There was substantially no difference in water



salinities during the two series.



     Mean sizes and Rangia used in these experiments appear in



Table 10.  They ranged between 4 and 5 cm in height.



Macoma balthica



     A single experiment was conducted with the clam Macona



balthica during the second series.  Tna M-Tcoma were held in the

-------
                          - 18 -






same tray with oysters receiving sediments in suspension at a



high concentration of Kepone.  However, they were placed in the



tray one week later than the oysters and consequently, they



remained in the tray one week after all the oysters had been



removed.



     The Macoma laid directly on the bottom of the tray and,



being fairly small (average height was between 1.4 and 1.7 cm;



Table 11) were in close contact with the contaminated sediments



that settled on the tray bottom.  Sediments settling to the



bottom of the experimental trays were removed every two or three



days .



     The Macoma accumulated Kepone at the fastest rate of the



three species studied to date.  After three weeks the concentra-



tion was 0.33 ppm (Figure 14).  During the fourth week there



was a slight drop to 0.30 ppm.



     Mean water temperatures in the trays holding Macoma ranged



between 21 and 24°C during the four weekly periods (Table 6).



Mean water salinities ranged between 17 aid 2d/-o.



     Mean sizes of Maooma used in these experiments appear in



Table 11.  Thay ranged around 1.5 cm in height.



Condition index.   Measurements of the meat quality of samples of



the experimental animals showad no significant differences between



those analyzed at the start of the experiments and those analyzed



after approximately four x
-------
There was little difference in the results obtained for Crass-



ostrea and Rangia.  Macoma, however,  accumulated Kepone in greater



concentrations than the other two species.



     Crassostrca and Rangia showed similar trends in uptake of



Kepone from suspension.  This showed that the two species have



similar feeding habits.  As suspension feeders, they are reacting



in a similar manner to the presence of the sediments in suspension.



Such a similarity was reinforced by the experiments in which



individuals of the two species were buried partly or fully in a



bed of contaminated sediments.  Neither one of the two species



accumulated much Kepone under those circumstances.  Water flo-7



over the sediment beds was relatively slow and the water-sediment



interface was not disturbed.   Therefore, very little of the



sediment was re-suspended.  Concentrations in Rangia were slightly



higher than those for oysters and if there is any significance



to the difference it may be an indication that by being fully



buried with its siphon close to the sediment surface, Rang La



had access to sediments not available to oysters.



     The data for oysters showed a strong correlation between



the mean hourly concentration of Kepone in suspended sediments,



computed for weekly intervals, and the mean concentration in



oyster samples exposed to those sediments during the same weekly



period.  As illustrated in Figures 6-8, usually the Kepone in



oyster meats decreased or Increased from one week to the next



following a decrease or increase in Kepone in the sediments during



the intervening week.  The validity of such a correlation is furthe



reinforced by the similarity between the patterns of the curve



for low and high sediment concentrations in each of the three




series of exoerinents.

-------
                          - 20 -






     A weaker correlation (0.614) was also found in the data



for Rangia. Further collection of data for Macoma will be



necessary before it can be determined if the relationship holds



for that species.



     This correlation indicates that, at the temperatures included,



oysters and possibly other bivalves such as Rangia and Macoma



depurate themselves of Kepone continuously at the same time that



they ingest and accumulate it.  Therefore, in order for the Kepone



level to remain at a high level, the Kepone concentration in



suspension will also have to remain at a correspondingly high



level.



     Consequently, disturbance of river bottoms contaminated with



Kepone by natural processes or other processes initiated by man,



which would result in an increase in "the suspended sediment load,



appear to be capable of causing a  sharp increase in the levels



of Kepone in individuals of bivalve populations within reach of th



increased load.   On the other hand, it would appear that such an



increase in Kepone in the affected animals would also decrease



sharply once the disturbance is terminated.



     It is difficult to evaluate with the data obtained to date



the influence of temperature on the uptake and depuration of



Kepone by oysters and Rangia.   More data are required to establish



that.




     Further studies are planned to investigate this relationship



between Kepone in sediments and in bivalves.   The effect of con-



centrations in the sediments higher than those tested so far will



be considered.  The effect of higher water flows capable of

-------
                          - 21 -





causing suspension of surface sediments in a bed holding buried



animals will also be studied.  Experiments that include combina-



tions of contamination and depuration of bivalves will also be



conducted.



     The: levels of Kepone flowing over animals in experimental



trays have  been fairly low - never higher than 0.15 ppb in the



water column - in the experiments conducted so far.  This has



been dictated by restrictions in the capability of our system



and personnel to maintain larger quantities of sediments in stock



suspensions and flowing over the animals around the clock for



four weeks.  Changes required to achieve higher sediment concentra-



tions will  be implemented in the forthcoming series of experiments.



     The data indicate that a leveling in the concentration of



Kepone in oysters and Rangia occurs  after the first week of



exposure.  This was seen best in the curves obtained by normali-



zation of the data using as a constant the mean hourly concentra-



tion of Kepone in the sediments for the duration of each experiment



Since no animal samples were analyzed for a period shorter than



one week it is quite possible that the leveling may occur  sooner



than one week.  Either way, this is another indication of the



efficiency  of these bivalves to depurate themselves of Kepone



since it: is evidently a balance between uptake and depuration that



is responsible for the leveling off in the curves.



     Analysis of oyster biodeposits indicated that Kepone is



concentrated in feces to levels many thousand times higher than



it is present in the water column.  These observations re-emphasize



the importance of the effect biodsposition can have on the



physico-chemical characteristics of sediments.  At the same time

-------
                          - 22 -


oysters accumulate Kopone In their tissues to levels up to

3000 times that in the water column,  they are also re-depositing

high concentrations of the chemical on the bottom.  This re-

deposition is being done in the form of material less likely

to be resuspended because of its nature as an aggregate.

     Kepone concentration in oyster pseudofeces was not much

different than that found in sediments that settled by gravity

onto the tray bottom.  Therefore, there appears to be no indica-

tion that pseudofeces contribute to the deposition of Kepone-rich

sediments any more than natural sedimentation would.  However,

pseudofeces form an aggregate which like feces may also resist

re-suspension to a greater extent than naturally-settling

sediments.

     There is no way to establish to what extent sediments

settling by gravity in experimental trays are included in the

samples of feces and pseudofeces collected.  However, the concen-

trations recorded for feces are so much greater than in the

natural sediments and the bulk of the feces was so obviously

greater ~han the fine blanket of sediments on the bottom of the

tray, that it can be safely infered that their contribution to

che values recorded for feces are minimal.



                    Literature Cited

Haven, D. S. 1950. Seasonal cycle of condition index of oysters
     in che York and Rappahannock  Rivers.  Proc.  Nat'1 Shellfish
     Assoc. 54: 42-65.

-------
   Table 1.  Concentration of Kepone in sediments and in the
             meats of oysters during successive exposure per-
             iods in first series of Kepone uptake experiments
             24 February - 27 March, 1977
Exposure
 Period
 No.
days
Sediments
  Range
(ppb)    Meats
Hourly
 Mean
        Mean
Concentration
   Factor
Low Sediment Concentration
1
2
3
4
6.9
14.8
2L.8
29.2
0.014
0.014
0.003
0.015
- 0.039
- 0.066
- 0.045
- 0.046
                                     0.027
                                     0.037
                                     0.023
                                     0.033
                                  0.086
                                  0.125
                                  0.135
                                  0.113
                                   3185
                                   3289
                                   5625
                                   3228
Medium Sediment Concentration
1
2
3
4
6.9
14.8
2L.8
29.2
0.027
0.027
0.006
0.029
- 0.083
- 0.142
- 0.091
- 0.092
                                     0.057
                                     0.073
                                     0.045
                                     0.067
                                  0.130
                                  0.160
                                  0.185
                                  0.133
                                   2281
                                   2078
                                   3854
                                   1900
High Sediment Concentration
1
2
3
4
6.9
14.8
21.8
29.2
0.040
0.054
0.008
0.044
- 0.197
- 0.197
- 0.133
- 0.137
                                     0.082
                                     0.104
                                     0.070
                                     0.098
                                  0.185
                                  0.250
                                  0.210
                                  0.257
                                   2256
                                   2294
                                   2838
                                   2495
            IShort period of time when no contaminated sediments
             were being added to the water flox^ing over the animals
             (i.e., sediment concentration = 0) are not included
             in range.   However, they were used in computing the
             mean.  This includes the final 8-9 hours when animals
             were allowed to flush out sediments in their digestive
             tract prior to removal for analysis.

-------
 Table 2.  Concentration of Kcpone in sediments and in animal
           meats during successive exposure periods in second
           series of Kepone uptake experiments.  13 May - 19
           June, 1977.
Exposure   No.
 Period   Days
Range
Sediments (ppb)
         Hourly
          mean
Meats
Mean
(ppm)
Concentration
  Factor
 Low Concentration
Oysters :
1
2
3
4
Rangia:
1
2
3
4

7.3
14.8
22.0
29.0

7.3
14.8
22.0
29.0

0.024
0.024
0.017
0.028

0.024
0.024
0.016
0.028

- 0.07B1
- 0.058
- 0.040
- 0.055

- 0.077
- 0.057
- 0.039
- 0.054
High Concentration
Oysters :
1
2
3
4
Rangia:
1
2
3
4
Ma coma:
1
2
3
4

7.2
14.7
21.9
28.9

7.2
14.7
21.9
28.9

7.5
14.7
21.7
29.0

0.054
0.058
0.040
0.068

0.057
0.061
0.043
0.071

0.058
0.040
0.068
0.095

- 0.178
- 0.139
- 0.095
- 0.132

- 0.18S
- 0.147
- 0.100
- 0.140

- 0.139
- 0.095
- 0.132
- 0.131
                                    0.042
                                    0.035
                                    0.026
                                    0.038
                                    0.039
                                    0.034
                                    0.025
                                    0.037
                                    0.098
                                    0.086
                                    0.063
                                    0.093
                                    0.104
                                    0.091
                                    0.067
                                    0.098
                                    0.086
                                    0.063
                                    0.093
                                    0.098)
                        0.039
                        0.058
                        0.064
                        0.096
                        0.025
                        0.050
                        0.048
                        0.083
                        0.09
                        0.16
                        0.11
                        0.23
                        0.05
                        0.14
                        0.11
                        0.22
                        0.13
                        0.19
                        0.33
                        0.30
                                931
                               1667
                               2424
                               2526
                                641
                               1453
                               1912
                               2237
                                905
                               1860
                               1732
                               2484
                                521
                               1545
                               1644
                               2254
                               1512
                               2992
                               3564
                               3067
             •"•Short  periods  of  time  when  no  contaminated sediments
             were being  added  to  the  water  flowing  over the animals
              (i.e.,  sediment concentration  = 0 are  not included in
             range.   However,  they  were  used in computing the mean.
             This includes  the final  8-9 hours when arrivals were
             allowed to  flush  out sediments in their digestive tracts
             prior  to  removal  for analysis.

-------
    Table  3.  Concentration  of  Kepone  in  sediments  and  in  the  meats
             of  oysters  and Rangla  during  successive exposure periods
             in  third  series of  Kepone uptake  experiments.  8 July  -
             9 August,  1977.
 Exposure    No.
  Period    Days
                  Sediments (ppb)     Meats
               Range       Hourly     Mean
                            mean      (ppm)
Concentration
  Factor
 Low Sediment  Concentration
Oysters :
1
9
3
4
Rangia:
1
2
3
4

8.0
15.4
23.4
31.0

8.0
15.4 .
23.4
31.0

0.018
0.012
0.007
0.008

0.020
0.014
0.008
0.008

- 0.0871
- 0.058
- 0.041
- 0.085

- 0.097
- 0.066
- 0.044
- 0.082

0.047
0.020
0.020
0.035

0.058
0.026
0.024
0.041
 High Sediment  Concentration
 Oysters:

   1
   2
   3
   4

 Rangia:

   1
   2
   3
   4
 8.1
15.5
23.5
31.0
 8.1
15.5
23.5
31.0
                                                 0.113
                                                 0.067
                                                 0.049
                                                 0.067
                                                 0.058
                                                 0.063
                                                 0.041
                                                 0.068
                                                2404
                                                3350
                                                2450
                                                2030
                                                1000
                                                2423
                                                1708
                                                1658
0.046
0.031
0.019
0.019
- 0.223
- 0.096
- 0.078
- 0.195
0.113
0.043
0.040
0.088
0.21
0.10
0.069
0.16
1858
2325
1725
1818
0.058
0.039
0.021
0.023
- 0.284
- 0.121
- 0.086
- 0.230
0.153
0.065
0.053
0.126
0.12
0.12
0.085
0.125
784
1846
1604
992
-'Short  periods  of  time when  no  contaminated  sediments  were being  added tc
 the  water  flowing over  the  animals  (i.e.,  sediment  concentration = 0)
 are  not  included  in  range.   However,  they  were  used in  computing the met
 This includes  the final  8-9 hours when  animals  were allowed to flush
 out  sediments  in  their  digestive tract  prior to removal for analysis.

-------
        Table 4. Normalized values for Kepone concentration in
                 oysters exposed in laboratory trays to suspen-
                 sions of sediments contaminated with Kepone.
                 Presented as a function of the mean.hourly
                 concentration in sediments for the duration
                 of each experiment.
     Exposure
      Period
 Length
   of
Exposure
 (days)
  Mean
 hourly
  cone .
 Kepone
for each
 period
 (ppb)
Mean
hourly
cone .
Kepone
for
accumulated
time periods
(ppb)
Actual
cone .
Kepone
in
oyster
meats
(ppm)

Normal ized
cone .
Kepone
in
oyster
meats^
(ppm)

First series of experiments (24 Feb - 27 March 1977)

                                         0.027
                                         0.032
                                         0.029
                                         0.0303
1
2
3
4
6.9
14.8
21.8
29.2
0.027
0.037
0.023
0.033
         1
         2
         3
         4

         1
         2
         3
         4
   6.9
  14.8
  21.8
  29.2

   6.9
  14.8
  21.8
  29.2
  0.057
  0.073
  0.045
  0.067

  0.082
  0.104
  0.070
  0.098
0.057
0.066
0.059^
0.0613

0.082
0.094
0.085^
0.0903
0.087
0.125
0.136
0.113.-

0.130
0.160
0.188
0.133

0.185
0.250
0.209
0.257
0.097
0.101
0.177
0.103

0.139
0.134
0.255
0.121

0.203
0.215
0.269
0.236
Second series of experiments (13 May - 11 June 1977)
         1
         2
         3
         4

         1
         2
         3
         4
   7.3
  14.8
  22.0
  29.0

   7.2
  14.7
  21.9
  28.9
  0.042
  0.035
  0.026
  0.038

  0.098
  0.086
  0.063
  0.093
0.042
0.038
0.034Q
0.035-3

0.098
0.092
0.0830
0.0853
0.039
0.058
0.064
0.096

0.090
0.160
0.110
0.230
0.032
0.058
O.OS6
0.088

0.078
0.158
0.148
0.210

-------
                   Table 4, (con'td)
                         Normalized values in oyster meats
Exposure Length Mean
Period of hourly
Exposure cone .
(days) Kepone
for each

Third series
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4

of experiments
8.0
15.4
23.4
31.0
8.1
15.5
23.5
31.0
period
(ppb)
(8 July
0.047
0.020
0.020
0.035
0.113
0.043
0.040
0.088
                               Mean
                              hourly
                               cone.
                              Kepone
                               for
                            accumulated
                            time periods
                                (ppb)
                         - 9 Aug. 1977)

                               0.047
                               0.034
                               0.0290
                               0.0313

                               0.113
                               0.080
                               0.066,,
                               0.072-3
Actual
 cone .
Kepone
  in
 oyster
meats-"-
 (ppm)
Normalized
   cone.
  Kepone
    in
  oyste^
  meats"
   (ppm)
  0.110
  0.067
  0.049
  0.067

  0.210.
  0.100
  0.069
  0.160
     0.072
     0.104
     0.076
     0.059

     0.133
     0.167
     0.124
     0.131
1  Determined analytically
2  Normalized value computed proportionally
3  Mean value reference  used in computing normalized values in
   oysters

-------
Table 5.   Mean hourly concentration of Kepone in
          sediment suspensions flowing over Rangia
          and Macoma during the total duration of
          each period of exposure in experimental
          trays.
              Total
             duration
           of exposure
              (days)
 Mean hourly
concentration
   for  each
weekly period
    (ppb)
 Mean hourly
concentration
   for  full
period (ppb)
    Second series of experiments  (13 May - 11 June 1977)

    Low sediment concentration
               7.3
              14.8
              22.0
              29.0
    0.039
    0. (n 4
    0.025
    0.037
    0.039
    0.037
    0.033
    0.034
    High sediment concentration
               7.2
              14.7
              21.9
              28.9
    0.104
    0.091
    O.C67
    0.098
    0.104
    0.097
    0.087
    0.090
    Third series of experiments  (8 July - 9 August)

    Low sediment concentration
               8.0
              15.4
              23.4
              31. 0
    0.052
    0.026
    0.024
    0.041
    0.058
    0.043
    0.036
    0.037
    High sediment concentration

               8.1             0.153
              15.5             0.065
              23.5             0.053
              31.0             0.126
                      0.153
                      0.111
                      0.091
                      0.100

-------
  'able 5,  Continued
Scecies
 Kacona:
         Total
       duration
     of  exposure
         (days)
 Mean hourly
concentration
   for  each
weekly period
    (ppb)
 Mean hourly
concentration
   for  full
period  (ppb)
Second series of experiments (8 July - 9 August 1977)

High sediment concentration
                     7.5
                    14.7
                    21.7
                    29.0
                          0.086
                          0.063
                          0.093
                          0.093
                      0.036
                      0.075
                      0.081
                      0.085

-------
Table 6.  Range and mean of water temperature and
          salinity in trays holding animals during
          Kepone uptake experiments.
Weekly
Period
Temperature (C)
Range
1st Series
Oysters :




2nd Series
Oysters :




icoma:




Rangia:




3rd Series
Oysters :




Rangia:



Mean
(Feb. 24 - March 27, 1977)

1st
2nd
3rd
4th
(May 13

1st
2nd
3rd
4th

1st
2nd
3rd
4th

1st
2nd
3rd
4th
(July 8

1st
2nd
3rd
4th
1st
2nd
3rd
4th

14.0 -
15.0 -
16.1 -
14.8 -
- June 19, 1977)

18.3 -
21.3 -
22.3 -
20.5 -

21.3 -
22.3 -
20.5 -
20.7 -

16.6 -
13.7 -
19.0 -
18.0 -
- August 9, 1977;

26.9 -
26.8 -
25.0 -
26.5 -
20.5 -
20.4 -
19.0 -
20.0 -

20.8
21.0
20.8
19.6


25.0
25.0
25.7
25.0

25.0
25.7
25.0
25.9

21.2
20.8
22.3
21.3
)

34.0
32.0
30.0
30.9
24. 3
24.9
22.0
23.2

17.2
17.7
18.5
17.0


20.9
22.4
23.5
21.5

22.4
23.5
21.5
23.7

18.6
19.5
20.4
19.2


29.6
29.3
26.6
28.5
22 . 9
22^5
20.3
21.4
                                          Salinity (o/oo)
                                          Range
                                        19.3
                                        19.1
                                        19.1
                                        17.5
  22.1
  20.6
  20.1
  19.2
                                          0.5
                                          5.0
                                          1.3
                                          3.2
   7.3
   6.4
   7.9
   6.4
                                         20.2
                                         20.9
                                         21.9
22.9 -

 2.8 -
 3.9 -
 4.2 -
 2.3 -
- 20.8
- 22.1
- 22.9
  23.6
                                                 8.7
                                                 8.8
                                                 6.0
                                                 6.8
          Mean
                20.4
                20.2
                19.7
                18.4
17.5
16.2
17.5
18.9
- 19.2
- -17.9
- 19.5
- 20.3
18.3
17.1
18.3
19.4
16.2
17.5
18.9
19.9
- 17.9
- 19.5
- 20.3
- 20.0
17.1
18.3
19.4
19.9
                 5.5
                 5.4
                 5.1
                 5.0
                20.6
                21.6
22
23.
            5.9
            6.1
            5.4
            5.4

-------
    Table 7.  Concentration of Kepone in the meats of
              oysters and Rangia held in control trays
              receiving no contaminated sediments and
              in test trays partially or fully buried
              in unsieved sediments contaminated with"
              Kepone.  July 8 - August 9, 1977.  Means
              in parentheses.
    Exposure
     Period
Cumulative
    No.
   Davs
 Kepone  Cone
  in  Animals
  Buried in
  Sediments
	(ppm)
A.  Oysters (partially buried in test trays):
       2

       3
    8.5



   15.9

   23.9



   31.6
    0.034
    0. 040
   (0.037)

    0.024

    0".014
    O.Olo
   (0.016)

    0.014
   4.0.009
  «O.OC7)
Kepone Cone,
 in Control
   Animals
  ^0.007



  <0.009

  ^0.005



  <0.004
    Rangia (fully buried in mud)

       1             8.5



       2            15.9



       3            23.9



       4            31.6
                    0.067
                    0.035
                   (0.051)

                    0.053
                    0.039
                   (0.0*6)

                    0.029
                    0.033
                   (0.033)

                    0.034
                    0.031
                   (0.032)
                      0.011
                    <0.006
                    <0.003
                    <0.007

-------
Table 7 (Continued)


B.  Concentration of Kepone (in ppm) in unsieved sediments
    used in test trays in which animals were fully or partially
    buried.

       1.   Mixed samples at start of experiment:   0.71
           (Same sediments used in both travs)      2.83
                                                  (1.77)

       2.   Fractionated and mixed samples at end of experiment:

              a.  Mixed sample from oyster trays   2.89

              b.  Sample from top 1-cm layer in
                  oyster tray                      2.24

              c.  Mixed sample from Rangia tray    2.12

              d.  Sample from top 1-cm layer in
                  Rangia tray                      0.64

-------
.'f •()
I I'D
                (f Cf/f ! )
                (nuo'fjf j

                (8(10'r  )
                                    OfO
                                    rc '0
u-  '0
                                    ei-o

                                   RIO'U
                    j.M'jil <<1  J'"1 ;ilill11-1>>
                                                            )
                                    C8'l
                                    CH'I

                                    cr-T
                                    6i '0

                                    9.' '0
                                    OS - 0
                                    ff -0

                                    6t T
tccro

OVO'O
oriro

f ',n'0
                                                    I 1 1 • 0
                                                    / '. f I • O
                                                                                     p >|>n 'iKi-^ ur
                                                                                    ii.M n j |c:.^ u'.i )
•<[»r  if

-------
Table 9.  Moan height (in cm) of oysters in
         different samples analysed for Kepone
         during uptake experiments.  Number of
         animals in each sample appears in
         parentheses.
Exposure
Period
First series
1
2
3
4
Second series
1
2
3
4
Third Series
1
2
Low Medium
Kepone Kepone
cone. cone.
in in
sediments sediments
of experiments
(4)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(4)
of
(8)
(4)
(4)
(3)
(5)
(4)
(4)
(5)
of e
(3)
(2)
(3)
(3)
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
.7
.8
.7
.4
.2
.0
.1
.2
.8
(24 Feb -
(4) 7.2
(3) 7.1
(4) 7.6
(3) 7.5
(4) 7.3
(3) 7.1
(4) 6.1
(4) 7.3
(5) 7.3
experiments (13 May
5
6
5
6
5
5
5
5
.8
.0
.4
.9
.4
.7
.1
.6
xperiments
8
7
7
7
.1
.7
.9
.6




(8 July -

High Animals
Kepone Buried
cone . in
in mud
sediments
27 March 1977)
(4) 6.1
(3) 7.0
(4)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(4)
(4)
(4)
7
7
6
6
7
7
7
- 19 June
(8) 5
(4)
(4)
(3)
(5)
(6)
(5)
9 Aug.;
(3)
(2)
(3)
(3)
5
4
6
4
5
5
•
7
7
•7
7
.1
.0
.7
.6
.8
.8
.4
1977)
.7
.6
.3
.4
.8
.1
.5
1977)
.2 (3) 6.6
.9 (3) 7.2
.6 (3) 6.1
.6 (3) 7.4
Control
Animals
(4)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(4)
(4)
(3)

(2)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(3)
(5)
(4)
(4)
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
7

7
6
6
4
6
5
7
7
.8
.3
.1
.7
.6
.3
.8
.4
.5

.9
.0
.3
.9
.6
.4
.5
.7

-------
T.»!)]<•  ') ,  Con I'd)
.posure
Period


Low
Kepone
cone.
in
sediments
Medium
Kepone
cone .
in
sediments
High
Kepone
cone .
in
sediments
Animals
Buried
in
mud
Control
Animals


                (3')  7.6
                (3)  7.5

                (4)  7.1
                (4)  6.8
(3) 7.5
(3) 7.0
(3) 7.7
(4) 6.3
(3) 6.9
(3) 7.3
(4) 7.0
(3) 7.4
(4) 7.7
(3) 7.7
(3) 8.2

-------
Table 10. Mean height (in cm) of Rangia in different
samples analyzed for Kepone during uptake
experiments. Number of animals in each
sample appears in parentheses.
Exposure Low High Aniir.als Control
period Kepone Kepone buried Animals
cone . cone . in
in in mud
sediments sediments
Second series of experiments (13
1
2
3
4
Third
1
2
3
4
(8)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(8)
(8)
(8)
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
9
9
9
7
7
6
7
8
series of experiments
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(5)
5.
4.
4.
5.
5.
5.
4.
01
99
49
00
15
03
73
(8)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(8)
(8)
(8)
(8
(2)
(3)
(4)
(4)
(5)
(4)
(5)
(6)
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
May •
6
8
8
7
8
7
7
6
July -
5.31
4.90
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.
4.
88
92
02
89
83
79
- 19 June 1977)



9 Aug
(3)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(4)
(4)
(5)
(5)



. 1977)
4.85
5.04
'4.92
5.02
5.12
4.96
5.00
5.24
(8)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
'(8)
(7)
(5)
(6)
(6)
(5)
(5)
4.
5 .
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
8
0
8
7
8
5
7
20
74
98
88
75

-------
Table 11.   Mean  height  (in cm)  of Macoma in different
           samples  analyzed for Kepone  during uptake
           experiments.   Number of animals  in each sample
           appears  in parentheses.
  Exposure                  High                 Control
   Period                 Kepone                 Animals
                           cone.
                            in
                         sediments
  Second  series  of experiments  (13  May -  19  June  1977)

     1                     (15)  1.7               (10)  1.6

     2                     (12)  1.6               (10)  1.6

     3                     (12)  1.5               (11)  1.6

     4                     (10)  1.4               (  7). 1.6

-------
       7)
;rouiid •^>——-//	
   G
   Water
To Floor Drain
                                                    To Floor Drain
Fifjure  1.   Sot':> of apparatus used  in  uptake experiments with
            bi veil-A.: molluscs in three  series of  experiments.

-------
Ksy to identification of components in Figure 1

     A.   Constantly-overflowing box providing York River water
         supply to system.

     B.   Submersible pump.

     C.   Heat exchanger system.

     D.   Cascading trough used to allow escape of gases coming out
         oi: suspension  as  result of river water being heated up.

     E.   Constantly-overflowing overhead trough from which water
         for experimental trays was siphoned.

     F.   Flow meter.

     G.   Peristaltic pump used to meter out sediment suspension.

     H.   Flask holding sediment suspension.

     I.   Mixing chamber receiving simultaneously York River water
         and sediment suspension.

     J.   Magnetic stirrer.

     K.   Experimental tray  holding oysters.

     L.   Wet table holding  experimental trays.

     M.   Drain pipe maintained a water level of about one-inch
         on wet table.   This served as first component of a series
         o.t sediment trays.

     N.   W.ater from wet table overflowed into a series of three
         other sediment traps.

     0.   Siphon to mixing chamber of Rangia trays.

     P.   Constantly-flowing  overhead trough from which water of low
         salintiy for experimental trays was siphoned.

     Q.   Siphon used to add  river water from Trough E to fresh water
         in Tray P.

-------
Figure 2.  Arrangement of  trays,  mixing  chambers and peristaltic
       pumps in third series of  experiments  in which animals re-
       ceived contaminated sediments  in  suspension.  Oysters in
       large trays and Rangia  in  small ones.

-------

                                  "&"' ?•> %    5S2&1 -.*'•*•*»-» ".?-", V|.V  |£ * '  ,S
                                      •»WWB»,," "S^^^Sw ™ " *'^V* '  ? «S.^^4^r **«.*
Figure  3.   Control oysters  (A) and  Rangia  (B)  in small trays
        at  start  of third  series of  experiments.

-------
Figure 4.  Oysters  (A) and  Rangia  (B)  partially buried in bed
       of sediments contaminated with  Kepone  at start of third
       series of experiments.  Subsequently  Rangia buried them-
       selves fully.

-------
     e taken for determination
ol  Kopone concentration.
                                   Grab samples collected at
                                   Jordan  Point, James River.
                                   Mixed and divided into sub-
                                   samples approximately 500 ml
                                   in  volume.   Bagged and stored
                                   in  freezer.
                                   Bag  of  sediments thawed.
                                   Mixed with well water and shaken
                                   mechanically for 12 hours or
                                   more.
                                   Wet-sieved through 63 u sieve
                                   Diluted up to 7000 ml with
                                   well  water (stock suspension)
Divided into measured portions
Sample taken for determination
of sediment concentration
(dry weight per unit vol).
                                   Diluted with well water 1:4
                                   Metered into experimental trays
                                   and  mixed wi th inflowing river
                                   water at predetermined rates to
                                   approximate predetermined dilutions.
             Figure  5.   Flow  chart  showing  stops taken in preparation of sediments
                        COn t ill'.i llKi t eel With Ki  .>•>.. tm  i n t rrwliw- i i f •> ,..i.^ ......

-------
                  KEPONE CONCENTRATION (PPM)  IN OYSTER MEATS
  p-
  (C
  C

  o
O O
. Cj
~
—
^J"
O
10
p
in

d-1
.
,-
•3
•^
'J
_~

^7-
0
^
f— '

n
o
2
o
o
D
rr
^
rr
P-
O
'
0
i

s^
o
t-^.
o
D
f?

H-
3

COD
X O
~ ~ O
0 rr O
'"S &> D
f- 3 O
3 H- O
ODD
D p cc
P*. .-f. ^
'n ^ r
» cL rT
^-i.
•o cn O
— O D

•^ P1- o
^ 3 "-n
CT C
* *3 X\
1 rr O
NJ tn T!
-J O
3 D O
^
1 tn H-
0 C D
~ cn
h— 3
h- 0 0
M3 n CD
-J tn rr
• O
D O
• t-h
P- O
O *TJ >~<
C P- W
h i-t rr '
O tn (D :
LO rt H; ;
w i
P- en
D O O
*-! X 1
P-T3 l
0) 0 i
en en :
o
-j -


_

rn ~
X
^J ~
O
t tn
C
:c
m
"0 Z-
rn
33
O
D

O
>
-<
to


N>_

-

-

™
'

"
-
ro
05 "


^.








                                                 o
                                                          o

                                                          g
                                                          CD

-------
U 3D ~
CO
IU 030 -
or
LJ
£ 025 -
0
^ 020 -
CL
6
t-

-------
   0.35T
   0.30
(K
LJ
I-
o
z
  0.25-
  0 20-
                     (0.113)
                       •
2
a.
o_


2
O
o:
LJ
O
o
o
o
a.
UJ
                                                                    (0.088)
  0.15
  0.10 -
  0.05-
                                                                    (0.035)
                          EXPOSURE PERIOD (DAYS)
     Figure  8.   Mean concentration of Kepone in meats of oysters exposed

                 to  contaminated sediments  in suspension (broken  lines)

                 or  partially  buried in bed of contaminated sediments
                 (solid line).   Third series of experiments,  8  July-9 August
                 1977.   FiuurOS  in oa ren t-hR.qo.q a rp  mr-^n hniir-lv  /^nnc^nh rx t- i nn

-------
 O30 n
5025 -
CL
Q.
R-O.78I
Y=0033
                 I 669 x
                                                                     O
                                                                O
o:
U)
>O.I5
LJ

oo.lO
ui
 005-
              O
—	  ,	1	1	
   O.O6    0.07    0.08
 KEPONE IN SEDIMENTS (PPB)
    O.OI
 O.G2
0.09
O.iO
                                                                          0.11
                                                                       0.12
     Figure  9.   Regression  of concentration of  Kepone  in  oyster meats
                 on mean hourly concentration  of Kepone  in suspended
                 sediments  for v/oekly  periods  in three  series of experi-

-------
  O 35
£ °3°H

UJ
5


LU 025H
O

Z
   020-
o.
o_
O
  0.15 -
CC
Ul
o


8°

UJ
•z.
o
UJ
   005-
          NORMALIZED VALUES CRASSOSTREA VMGINICA


          • FIR<;r SERIES  24 FEB-27 MARCH 1977 (MEAN TEMP! 17.0 - 18.5 C)


          O SECOND SERIES 13 MAY-19 JUNE I977{MEAN TEMP! 20 9"23. 5 C)


          A THIRD SERIES  8 JULY-9AUG 1977 (MEAN TEMP. 26 6" 29 6 C)
                                                                                      CO
                                                                                      a.
                                                                                      Q.
                                                                                      t-
                                                                                      z
                                                                                      UJ
                                                                                      Q

                                                                                      UJ
                                                                                      z:
                                                                                      o
                                                                                      o

                                                                                      UJ

                                                                                      o
                                                                                      Q.
                                                                                      UJ
                                                                                     I

                                                                                    (0 030)
                                                                                    0(0.035)
                                                                                        '(0031)
           ~i	1	r
                                  -(	1	1	1	1	1	1	\	1	1—p

                                           14                 21

                                   EXPOSURE  PERIOD (DAYS)
                                                                    i—r
                                                                               28
      Figure  10.
                    Mean concentration of  Kepone in  meats  of  oysters

                    exposed  to contaminated sediments in  suspension.

-------
                                      KEPONE  CONCENTRATIM  (PPM)  IN  OYSTER MEATS
ro  o
CJ  ^
3  =!
   0)
i-ti  t—•
O  H-
l-(  N
   ro
rt  a,
3^
ro  rt
   o
rt,
O  CJ
 I
   o
   o
£  3
(D  M
C  rr
7? CJ
   3
TJ  rt
Q
n  D-
)-• O
O  C
a ^
D
   O
O  O
CU  D
O  O
D" O
        TJ
        M-
       iQ
        C
        I-S
        ro
ro  s
x  ro
t3  DJ
O  3

ro  o
a o
   3
rt  O
o  ro

n  rt
O  <-(
3  D
rt  rr
CJ  H-
     ft) 0
     rt i-h
     ro
     a x
       ro
     w n
     ro o
     a 3
     H- ro
     3
     ro H-
     D D
     rt
     M g
       ro
     p. £U
     D rt
ro
   3 tn
   rt C  O
   i-{ cn  t-h
cn  O
2 rt
ro D-
CD ro
ro  o
3 "<

H- rt
o  ro
3  n
•   cn
o
o
en
i
O
0
1
p
o!
	 1 	
o
M
O
	 1 	
o
rj
Ul
	 1 	
o
OJ
o
	 1 	
o
OJ
en
	 1
                  X
                  T)
                  o
                  CO
                  c
             o


             &

             CO
               ro—
                    ro.
                    a>
                                                                                       O
                                                                                      i ;/>
                                                                                          z
                                                                                          o
3)
o
co
m
33
m
CO

CD
c.
C
1
r>
c
o
5
^
o
0
0
C'
rn
(/>
OJ
i.
-c
	
c_
C
2
m
<£
H
Crt
3:
rn

r^j
—
m
CD
no
2
O
c^
H i~
co jq
? s
m
" ^
iv £
-^ m
m
03
ro
-s
^!
l>
'j:
r>
X
CO
2
i>
<^>
Oi
o
'-n
S
,^ i>
m
>

H
m
2
                                                                                          2 2
                                                                                          m m
AN
                                                                                       m
                                                                                    ro
5
1
B
     m  rn

     T3  .t)
cn  M '-'  '-
 i  O N  N
ro  ^ O  O

cn  ro CD  CD

-« i^o
   o	•
                                                                            /   !CEPONE CONC. IN

                                                                               SEDIMENTS (PPB)
                                                  o
                                                  o

-------
Ul
I
Q.
0.

-------
to
h-
<
UJ
o
z
ct
a.
a.
z
o
UJ
o
z
o
o
z
o
O-
LJ
  0.30-,
  025-
  020-
   0.15-1
   0.10-
   005-
                     (0.153)
(0065)
(0026)
           •  . .  (0053),
                                                    (0.024)
                                (0.126)
                                (0.041)
    o -H=V-
                          EXPOSURE  PERIOD  (DAYS)
     Figure 13.  Mean  concentration of  Kepone in  meats of Raj]_g_i_a cunoata_
                  exposed  to contaminated  sediments  in suspension (broken
                  lines) or buried in  bed  of contaminated sediments (solid
                  line).   Third series of  experiments, 8July-9  Auyust 1977
                  Figures  ir purer.t MOSCS are mean  hourly concentration

-------
CO

<
UJ
     0.35 -i
030 -
                                                     (OO93)
                                                                 (0 098)
I
     0.25 -
a.
2:
o
oc.
    0.20 -
     0.\5 -
                               (0.063)/
                     (0.086),
o
z
o
o

UJ
z
o
Q.
UJ
     0.10 -
0.05 -
                                      14
                                                     21
                                                               28
                             EXPOSURE  PERIOD (DAYS)
        Figure  14.   Mean concentration of  Kepone  in  meats  of Macorna balthica

                     exposed  to contaminated  sediments in suspension.   Second
                                                  M;
                                                     r_ 1 Q
                                                                1 Q"77

-------
  EPA Jair.es River Kcponc Hydrop.raphical Survey Study



             Progress Report (Nov. 1, 1977)








I,  Hydragraphical Survey (Aug., 1977)



          Four transects were occupied for the field study



with three stations included in each transect.  The rr.iddle



(primary) station or primary station, measured top, middle



and bottom depth, vhile the two side channel  stations



measured top and bottom depths.   (figures of  the  transect



positions are included within).



          The following is a compilation of information



concerning each station.

-------
J.ircs Riv?r Station, Rivc-r rile 46.51, sampled from 8/26/77

    at 1500 to 8/23/77 at 1SOO.

  Station 46.51A - total depth 17 feet

    Current meter depth off the bottom:
                  2 feet and 7.5 feet

    Current meter time in:
                  8/23/77 at 1015

    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77 at 1935
    Samples taken at mid depth, included all parameters
                  except kepone

  Station 46.51 B - total depth 19.5  feet

    Current meter depth off the bottom:
                  3 feet and 10.5 feet

    Current meter time in:
                  8/23/77 at 1050

    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77 at 1925
    Samples taken at  ton, mid  and bottom depths,  included
                  all parameters

  Stati rr. 46.51 C - total depth 23  feet

    Current meter depth off the bottom:
                  2 feet,  6.5  feet  and  12.5  feet
    Current meter time in:
                  8/23/77  at 0940
    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77  at  1915
     Samples taken at  mid  depth,  included all parameters,
                  except  kepone

-------
                                                 -'•  •- ^ .;-',.   .-;   \,   -v
                                                         •'       .     - »v

                                                           \  >-       •    r~
                                                       • t   N i      /  /   w^^v	
V0<-;I  ':     )'":
        .
     '"         ''
                \   :

-------

-------
             X
                           I   f
?
 I '

                        '\      ^

-------
y   .. /
/    • *
                                                                                           t     .'.   "^
                                                                                                 '»"» •*     .>'
                 \
                              .*••'/
*' -iT /?
f ^l-' /• ' "XJ
f*tt<-#
^ \
''<«' ^-:. ' "' .-•»••»
• ' •.-•'- '
- , V *"" ^"' ' > • ' *•••••
-^ -• ** * «
- ^ '•• \, ,
. ?| .<
^ • ' ^. , ' -- r '
X.
',-...
                                                                                         -.{

-------
Station 73.24 sampled from 0800 8/27/77 to 8/29/77 1100

  Station 73.24 A - total depth 15.5 feet

    Current ir.eter depth off the bottom:
                  6 feet
    Current meter time in:
                  8/23/77 at 1550
    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77 at 1523
    Samples taken at mid depth, included all parameters
                  except kepone
  Station 73.24 B - total depth 21.5 feet

    Current meter depth off the bottom:
                  2.0, 7.5 and 13.0 feet
    Current meter time in:
                  8/23/77 at 1512
    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77 at 1545
    Samples taken from top, mid, bottom, included
                  all parameters
  Station 73.24C - total depth 12.5 feet

    Current meter depth off the bottom:
                  5 feet
    Current meter time in:
                  8/23/77 at 1440
    Current meter time out:
                  8/27/77 at 1600
    Samples taken at mid depth, included all parameters,
                  except kepone

-------
Star ion 87 .67 sampled from 0900 S/24/77  to 1200 8/26/77
   Station 87.67 A - total depth 33 feet

     Current meter depth off the bottom:
                   4,'12.5 and 27 feet
     Current meter time in:
                   8/22/77 at 1620
     Current meter time out:
                   8/29/77 at 1423
     Samples taken at mid depth, included all parameters
                   except kepone
   Station S7.67 B - total depth 23.5 feet

     Current meter depth off the bottom:
                   4, 9.5, and 16 feet
     Current meter time in:
                   8/22/77 at 1705
     Current meter time out:
                   8/29/77 at 1410
     Samples taken at top, mid, bottom, included
                   all parameters
     S i a t:'. on S 7 . 6 7 C - total depth 13.5 feet

     Current meter depth off the bottom:
                   5 feet
     Current meter time in:
                   8/22/77 at 1730
     Current meter time out:
                   S/29/77 at 1404
     Samples taken at mid depth, included all parameters.
                   except kepone

-------
Station 111 - sampled from 8/24/77 at 0900 to 8/26/77 at 1200


  Station 111 A - total depth 18 feet

    Current meter depth off the bottom:
                  4 and 11 feet
    Current meter time in:
                  S/22/77 at 1350
    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77 at 1215
    Samples taken at mid depth, included all parameters
                  except kepone
  Station 111 B - total depth 20 feet

    Current meter depth off the bottom:
                  2/7.5 and 13 feet
    Current meter time in:
                  S/22/77 at 1140
    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77 at 1210
    Samples taken at top, mid,  and bottom depth,  ir.cluded
                  all parameters
  Station 111 C - total depth 13 feet
                   \
    Current meter depth off the. bottom:
                  5 feet
    Current meter time in:
                  S/22/77 at 1215
    Current meter time out:
                  8/29/77 at 1225
    Samples taken at mid depth,  included all parameters,
                  except kepone

-------
    Tide £aup,es were installed in the following three



locations.   They were installed one week before the field



intensive survey and pulled out one week after the



intensive survey.  Currently, all tide data are being sent



to Fisher and Porter for reduction.



    Tide gauge stations.^



    1)   Wooden Pier at Ft. Eustis



    2)   Pier Chickahominy Holiday Inn Campground



        (off Rt.  5, near mouth of Chickahominy)



    3)   Westover, Va. Pier (near Hopewell)








II.  Data Reduction



    All hydrographical and sediment intensive data are



currently being keypunched.  Parameters include dissolved



oxy;;<_n, ter/.perature, conductivity, salinity, suspended



rc'iic5 and kepone concentration.  It is anticipated to



finish keypunching and editing by the end of November, 1977



    Current rr.eter films have been developed and are being



pic pared to be read.  It is also planned  to hcive  the data



reduction work done by the end of November, 1977.

-------
 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF KEPONE  DISTRIBUTION


              IN THE  JAMES RIVER
              Donald  J.  O'Connor

               Kevin  J.  Farley
Environmental Engineering and  Science Program

               Manhattan College

             Bronx,  New York 10471
   Annual  Report to Environmental Protection Agency
   Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf  Breeze,
                 Florida, 1977

-------
Introduction




     The general purpose  of  this  research  project is to assess




the effect of synthetic materials,  such  as pesticides, on the




water quality and ecology  of  estuarine systems.   The present




phase of the project is being  specifically directed to the ana-




lysis of the Kepone distribution  in the  James  River estuary in




the vicinity of and downstream from,  Hopewell,  Virginia.   The




ultimate goal is to provide  a  quantitative framework for  evalua-




tion of the time required  to  reduce the  Kepone  concentrations to




acceptable levels.
     Significant concentrations  of  Kepone  are  present in various




phases of the estuarine system  of  the  James  River  — in solution,




in suspension, in the sediment  and  in  the  food chain, particu-




larly in various species of fish.   The  interrelationships, or




more specifically, the transport,  uptake and release of Kepone,




as shown in Figure II, are thus  affected by  both  physio-chemical




mechanisms, as well as bio-ecological  phenomena.   The former of




these includes the hydrodynamic  transport  through  the estuarine




system, adsorption to and desorption from  the  suspended and bed




solids, and the settling and resuspension  of these solids.  The




latter incorporates the assimilation and excretion routes




through the various components  of  the  food chain.   Although




less significant for Kepone, transfer  to the atmosphere, photo-




chemical oxidation and biological  degradation  are  potentially

-------
                                   JAMES RIVER STUDY AREA
-TO RICHMOND

                                                                          N
           I
           10
      KILOMETERS
                                                                   | NEWPORT NEWS CITY
                                                                                        HAMPTON
                                                                                        ROADS
                                                                                        BRIDGE-
                                                                                        TUNNEL
NORFOLK
                                         FIGURE  !_

                                 JAMES  RIVER STUDY

-------
                     TRANSPORT KINETIC ROUTES WITHIN THE WATER COLUMN
                                        I PHOTOCHEMICAL DECOMPOSITION

                                      •0-
                         EVAPORATION
   PHOTO OXIDATION
     HYDROLYSIS
AEROBIC
BIODEGRADATION
                                                                                AIR
                                                                   INTERFACE:
                                            DIRECT INGESTION
                                            IN VARIOUS LEVELS
                                            OF FOOD CHAIN
                                                                              WATER
                                                                       NEKTON 1C
                                                                      ACCUMULATION
                                                                      IN FOOD CHAIN
     DESORPTION ABSORPTION
             I *
  SUSPENDED
                                                                              SEDIMENT
                             ANAEROBIC BIODEGRADATION-
                                     FIGURE  II

       TRANSPORT  - KINETIC  ROUTES WITHIN  THE. WATER  COLUMN

-------
The Distribution  of  Kepone on Solids

     Natural  clays  of various types, and organic material,  pos-

sess an  adsorptive  capacity.   The rates of adsorptive  reactions

are being  investigated experimentally under controlled  labora-

tory conditions in  order to provide realistic kinetic  coeffi-

cients for  the Kepone analysis.   The desorptive characteristics

of both  the inorganic and  organic fractions of the suspended

solids are  also being reviewed.   This phenomena of adsorption-

desorption  is one  of  the important transfer routes in  the ulti-

mate transfer of Kepone from  the system.  Based on the  Langmuir

Isotherms,  equations  have  been developed to predict the  spatial

and temporal  distributions of Kepone in an advective-dispersive

estuarine system.  However, due  to the preliminary nature of

this work,  the less  complex,  advective, steady state model  was

used for analysis.   Equations governing the water column a,nd

estuarine bed for such a system  are as follows:


1.  Water

               3m
    Solids  Ux ^- =  -K^ +  «Kum2

                  3C
    Dissolved  U     - =  --rm    -f K      - K ( C    ) -K
                ;L
    Particulate
                                                -  r
2.   Bed

               3m      K
    Solids  U, 3—^- = + — m. -  K  m0
             2 3x      a    1    u 2

-------
Diss olved  U,
                       - -Ko(rc-r2)m2C2+Kdr2m2+Kb(Cl-C2)
     Particulate
                     3P.
                                r  _
where:




     the subscripts 1 and 2 denote  the water  column and estuarine



bed concentrations, respectfully,
and where:




     U  - horizontal velocity




     C  - dissolved Kepone concentration




     x  - longitudinal distance




     K  - adsorption coefficient




     r  - solids adsorptive capacity




     r  - Kepone concentration on the solids




     m  - solids concentration




     K, - desorption coefficient




     K,  - bed diffusion coefficient




     K  - aeration coefficient
      SL



     P  - solids Kepone concentration




     K  - solids settling coefficient
      s



     a  - the ratio of bed volume to water column




         volume
                                                   [m /sec ]
                                                   [meters ]



                                                   [l/(yg/£-day)]



                                                   [yg/g]



                                                   [yg/g]



                                                   [g/M



                                                   [I/day]



                                                   [I/day]



                                                   [I/day]



                                                   [yg/g]



                                                   [I/day]







                                                   [ dimensi onless
     K   -  solids  scour coefficient
                                                   [I/day]

-------
     As a first step,  this  preliminary analysis was simplified



by various assumptions  -  subject to verification by the ongoing



field and laboratory  studies.   The first of these assumptions -

                                  3m.      8m^

solids being in equilibrium i.e. -z	 and -r	 = 0, appears  to be



a safe assumption  for  the non-saline portion of the estuary.  In



addition, the bed  solids  concentration,  m«, was said to be much



greater than the suspended  solids concentration, m  • the aera-



tion term, K , was  taken  to be  negligible; and the  solids
            3.


adsorptive capacity,  r  ,  was  assumed to be much greater than



either of the Kepone  concentrations on the solids,  r  and  r_.



The kinetic coefficients  -  K  ,  K , , K , and K , were assigned
                             O    Q   5       U


from the limited data  available.  Finally, for this "first-cut"



model, the Kepone  concentrations on the bed solids, r^, were



assigned from data; these concentrations were in turn utilized



in predicting the  Kepone  water  column concentrations.



     Based on these assignments of coefficients, the longitudinal



distribution of total  and dissolved Kepone in the water column



is presented in Figure  III  along with the State Water Control



Board 1976 Kepone  data.   The  line of total Kepone concentration



fits the data quite well  and  although the dissolved fraction of



Kepone is high, this  concentration is merely a function of



Kepone kinetic coefficients,  K   and K, - values which were



obtained from a minimal amount  of sketchy data.  Further analysis



is presently being  performed  which will predict both the wat-r



column and the bed  concentrations of Kepone.



     The above analysis will  be further complicated as the

-------
BED CONCENTRATION
        ppm
WATER CONCENTRATION, ppb
o p .-


X
M
O

M

5
t"1
G
§
H
i

o
73

i-3
ffi
M
cn
73
M
<*
M
50
M
i-3
G
>
73

P
^O
cr!
—
















Tl
M
O
G
M















O
m
O





i






b
cn






r~







*¥-e
J
£3
I
1
1
I


1


••^l*
•
Ck 00 ISJ O
oo
1 1 1







TiffH B






i •• t
^
J
•i




In i
	 IT
ISJ 	
O [
i 1
L u
I

i
i
1
3 	 1

I
'





O







CD
O






r~
m ~.
3°
2
—1







ISJ
O






O







B
-B-


H
b



.
_








i
—
.
ff















-\

n
B-





r



«^



o o p p o
'_ . NJ to J^ tn

1 1 1 1







r" i
»» i

l^/X3





1


i
r-


E*" 1


^D 1 1
r- m
flO "
fy\ 1 I I
*• — — o °°
1 r- -£•

& H
IP J rn
M








~n
Tl
I"
O
g
II
en
o
8
n
t/>




C-
>
<:
m
CO
33
<
m
JO
CO
H
>
H
m
5
>
H
m
R CONTROL
00
0
j>
33
O
CO
O)
•*
m
-o
O
2
m
O

H
•^



-------
saline portion of the estuary is approached.  As the lighter




clay particles which are maintained in suspension in the non-




saline area encounter the saline region of the estuary, floccu-




lation and agglomeration may occur, increasing the size and




possibly the density of the particles.  These factors result in




further deposition, which is enhanced by virtue of their occur-




rence in the null zone of the estuary.  There are, therefore,




a variety of significant factors which may account for the accu-




mulation of solids and Kepone in the estuarine bed at the fresh




water-saline interface.  These factors, along with the inability




to assume solids equilibrium in the saline region, have lead to




a detailed investigation of solid material in the estuary.









Hydrodynamic Transport




     Since the concentration of suspended solids is an important




factor as an accumulation site for Kepone, the temporal and




spatial distribution of the solids within the estuarine system




is a necessary element in the analysis.  The distribution is




determined by the hydraulic transport through the estuarine




system.  A two-dimensional  (longitudinal-vertical) analysis has




been developed, based on the fundamental principles of momentum,




continuity and state.

-------
     In this analysis, under  steady  state,  tidally averaged




conditions, the longitudinal  momentum  equation for a later-




ally homogeneous estuary  is:
where p = density; p = pressure;  N  =  vertical  eddy viscosity;




and u = horizontal velocity.   The coordinates  for Eq.  1 are




shown in Fig. IV in which  the  longitudinal  x-axis is positive




toward the ocean and the vertical z-axis  is positive toward the




bed of the estuary channel.  Boundary conditions  compatible




with Eq.  1 are,










          ~ = 0               at  z  =  -n•                    (2)
          -N    - Cd/Ub/Ub     at  z  -  h                      (3)
in which -n = surface elevation and h  =  average  depth;  C, =




dimensionless friction coefficient; and  u,  =  velocity at the




bed.  The vertical component of the momentum  equation is




simply the hydrostatic pressure equation:

-------
                                                                               V
RIVER
    FRESH WATER
                                                                      PLANE OF
                                                                      NO NET MOTION
                                                                                     OCEAN
                                      FIGURE  IV

             SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL ESTUARINE CIRCULATION

-------
     In order to solve Eq. 1, the hydrostatic pressure,  Eq.  4,




is expressed in terms of the horizontal and vertical  distribu-




tion of salinity.  The equation of state which  specifies  the




density as a function of salinity is given by:
              pf (1 + otC)                                    (5)
in which pf = the density at zero salt content  and  a  =  0.000757




(parts per thousand)  .  The components  of  the  pressure force




are then evaluated in terms of the  observed  vertical  and longi-




tudinal salinity gradients and freshwater  flow, which are




assumed known from measurement.




     The solution of the above equations indicates  that local




rather than boundary conditions control  the  magnitude and




gradient of horizontal velocity at  a particular location.  Be-




cause of local control, the velocity at  one  location  is rela-




tively independent of those at other locations.   This condition




occurs as a result of decoupling the equations  of motion and




salt transp ort.




     Results of this analysis are presented  for Pritchard's June




1950 survey and Nichols1 March 1965 survey  of  the James River in




Figure V and VII respectfully.  In  addition,  the  solution also




indicates the depth at which the net horizontal velocity is




zero.  Defining this depth at a number of  stations  and  interpo-




lating for others delineates the plane of  no net  motion for the




saline intrusion zone of the estuary, Figures  VI  and  VIII.   At




the tail of the salinity intrusion, this plane  meets  the bed of

-------
                    VELOCITY CALCULATION FOR JAMES RIVER ESTUARY (JUNE, 1950)
25

O
^ 20
>
t-
1 15
-j
<
to
oi 10
u
<
u.
"
_ •
X^
H^

^^
.x^
.x^
^x^
1 _U- 	 *
B
I I I I I














40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
DISTANCE FROM MOUTH, miles
VELOCITY, fps VELOCITY, fps VELOCITY, fps
-0.4 0 0.4 0.8 -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 -0.4 0 0.4 O.I
0

r 10
T
)-
Q_
LU
O
20

i\ '
*\
h *} •/
'A •/
»A a
VA 0
- \ i
I I I
/• "
/
f



MP 26.1

u

10



20

\
K
i*
.
/
O
- A \ p
A e
\A f
\A O
^A O
A. \9
I I I I 1*



M.P. 17.4

w

10



20

& I L*
A _,•'
^A «f
\^ f
\ A J*
\A *
\A |^>
^ ^ M.P. 11.9
V
I I I
|
46 11 13 15 15 17 19
SALINITY, °/oo SALINITY, °/00 SALINITY, °/00
NOTE. SALINITY AND VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS BY THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INSTITUTE
                                        FIGURE  V

-------
f
H
2
H
o
G
H
O
o
C-l  H
>  CD
w

G

K



M
                     c A i  iMi-rvx n /
                     SALINITY, o/

                           _.
                     U1     O
          VERTICAL
       VELOCITY X 10s,
00

 _.
 Ul
                                                          HORIZONTAL
                                                           VELOCITY,
                                                               fps
   VERTICAL EDDY
VISCOSITY/DISPERSION
  COEFFICIENT, cm^/s
                                                                                                     DEPTH, ft.
                                                                     o
                                                                                            05
                                                                                                  O
                                                                                                        O
                                 r
                                                        »
                                                 B

                                                  I
                                                  I
                                                  I
                                                  I
                                                                             B •
                                                                                           0 1.

                                                                  O
                                                                  II
                                                                  en
                                   I
                                  •


                                   \


                                   \
                                                                                                                  _
                                                                                                                         o
                                                                                         o
                                                                                         c.
                                                                                                                       li
                                                                                                                       II
                                                                                         rn
                                                                                         -a
                                                                                         m
                                                                                         oo
                                                                                         C
                                                                                         >
                                                                                         31
Ul
O

-------
                      VELOCITY CALCULATION FOR JAMES RIVER ESTUARY (MARCH, 1965)
                          SALINITY MEASUREMENT
                            11-20 MARCH 1965
                             FLOW. 8.SOO CFS
                                     30      25      20      15      10
                                       DISTANCE  FROM MOUTH, miles
r  10
i"
O-
LU
Q
  20
                   VELOCITY, fps
                  0.4   0   0.4  0.8
                   I
I
                         M.P. 27.1
                                   10
        20
                         VELOCITY, fps
                      -0.4  0   0.4   0.8
                                              A
                                              \
                                         I  I   I
                              M.P. 21.6
                                         10
20
       1     3
      SALINITY, o/00
             4     6
           SALINITY,
                                                                                      VELOCITY, fps
                                                                                   -0.4  0   0.4   0.8
                                                                                              I
                      M.P. 16 1
                                                                          9     11
                                                                        SALINITY,
  NOTE: SALINITY AND VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS BY THE VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE
                                            FIGURE VII
          VELOCITY CALCULATION FOR  JAMES  RIVER  ESTUARY  (MARCH,  1965)

-------
in
t1
H
H
O
f
0
>
1-3
H
g
VT)
OR JAMES RIVER
W
CO
G

^_^
, -^
*^
f
n
c



CO
g w
CO
H
-< m
"> -n
33
° 2M
^ 0
H C
H H
I
ro"
01





O
VFm'CAL HORIZONTAL VELOCITY, VERTICAL EDDY
SALINITY, o/00 x 1 0* f PS , , fPs VISCOSITY/DISPERSION DEPTH_ ft
1 _ ' fps i i 0 COEFFICIENT, cm2/s
m o'-'^^JONjoNj-i^cocx) oooc
1 1
CO  Cl
O w ^i
^( -0 5
— 3 $ ?
r- .^
t H
\
o
^V
t\






1





\
•1
-1
o
1
p
/ B






1 I





/
L
>'






i '
h
i
o
o
1
1
©
\.
o
\
«\
°\
o






1 1 1 1
1
1 H ® f^
T O ii G}
O rn O rs O
£ o £ ^ '
1 ^ CD
1 Co
• jk
• ^
y o
L
•
£3 O
»
'0 0
C; O






1 ;
O ^
II /

00 x
00 ''
0 /
o /
_. /
T ^
K) ',
° /
2 /
I /
_, ^
CD X
cn x
1 _



—

\
\
V 1--U-L-.
\
V
\ O
\
* ~o 	
Q ^
|
|) 0
| 5
n"i
: o —
^i
c5
^

en x.
—
U1

-------
the estuary.  Upstream  of  this  area,  the horizontal velocity in

the whole water column  is  in  the  seaward direction.

     The estuary  is  then  segmented  horizontally and the hori-

zontal flow in the surface  layer  at each vertical cross section

is first calculated.  Horizontal  flow difference between two

adjacent vertical planes  gives  the  vertical flow between the

surface and bottom layer,  from  which  the vertical velocity is

obtained by dividing by the average width of the segment.   This

procedure is obviously  a  solution of  the hydraulic continuity.

     The vertical flux  of  salt  due  to dispersion between the

surface and bottom layers  is  described by the dispersion coeffi-

cient, e, obtained from the vertical  eddy viscosity through

an empirical relationship,
                                                             (6)
where Ri (Richardson number)  is  defined  as:
          Ri =     —                                        (7)
               Dfl^2
               P(9z}

Equation 6 indicates the relationship  between  the two coeffi-

cients, whose general validity  has  been  shown  by field data,

as presented by Officer.

     The tidal diffusion and velocity  shear  contributions, which

can be envisioned collectively  as  a longitudinal dispersion across

a vertical section following the classical  one-dimensional estu-

arine analysis, did not exhibit themselves  in  the portion of the

-------
 estuary  that  our  models  were concerned.




      The  distribution of salinity was used to test the validity




 of  the hydrodynamic  model - bottom panels of Figures VI and




 VIII.  Based  on  these validations of the hydrodynamic model,  an




 analysis  of  suspended solids followed by incorporating the set-




 tling and  scour  rates with the hydrodynamic transport to deter-




 mine  the  distribution of solids.   Settling rates, for the




 present,  were  assumed constant down the length of the estuary




 and this  rate  was  obtained from the average particle size, using




 a modification of  Stokes'  Law.  Since little work has yet been




 performed  on  scouring rates in estuaries, these rates were




 assigned  merely  to show  that a good fit can be obtained.  Results




 of  this solids modeling, with and without the assigned scouring




 rates, are presented  in  Figure IX.




 ASSIMILATION AND DEPURATION OF KEPONE IN THE FOOD CHAIN




     The  transfer  of  Kepone from  its initial discharge at Hope-




 well to its accumulation in the fishery stock may occur in a




 number of ways.  It may  be ingested directly from that which  is




 dissolved or suspended in  the water; it may be assimilated by the




 phytoplankton-zooplankton;  and it may be taken in by bottom




 feeders from the material  which has settled in the channel bed.




 The predominant sites  for  settling  appear to be downstream from




Hopewell, in the region  of  the fresh water-saline interface,  and




 in various dead zones  in the  fresh  and  saline regions.   Experi-




ments  involving assimilation  and  depuration of Kepone by various




species are being conducted.   The rates of  accumulation and

-------
                  SUSPENDED SOLIDS CALCULATION FOR JAMES RIVER ESTUARY (MARCH. 1965)
   15

O
o

°.  10

h-

~,   5
        LEGEND

        O SURFACE LAYER


        A BOTTOM LAYER
                    Q = 8.800 cfs
              35
                  25
                                      20
15
120
                            LEGEND

                              SURFACE LAYER
     40
  35      30       25      20

DISTANCE FROM MOUTH, miles
                                         D
                                         O
                                                             10
                                           CC X p
                                           O X £  5
                                                      cc
                                                                 I
                                                              I
                                                                 NET SCOUR
                                                                  FROM BED
                                                                            NET SETTLING
                                                                               INTO BED
                                                120
                                                            100
                                              en
                                              E
                                              to"
                                              g

                                              O
                                              to
                                              o
                                              UJ
                                              Q
                                              Z
                                              LU
                                              CL
                                              CO

                                              to
                                                            80
                                                            60
                                                            40
                                                            20
                                                          = 6 fpd
                                                                                         LEGEND
                                                                                          SURFACE LAYER
                                                                                       A BOTTOM LAYER
                                                                                 JL
                                                                              I
                                                                                                   I
                                                                  40       35     30       25      20
                                                                         DISTANCE FROM MOUTH, miles
  NOTE  SUSPENDED SOLIDS MEASUREMENTS BY THE VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE
                                                        TY

-------
excretion, equilibrium conditions  and  concentrations, lethal




and chronic - are being  analyzed  in  order  to  incorporate these




kinetic factors in a food  chain analysis.




     Preliminary analysis  has  been made  in evaluating the assi-




milation and depuration  kinetics  on  various species of fish.




Data from experimental studies performed  at EPA's Gulf Breeze




Laboratory are used to evaluate the  relevant  coefficients.   The




equation utilized in this  analysis - similar  to the Langmuir




kinetic equation for the adsorption  to and desorption from sus-




pended solids, is as follows:
           = Ko(rc-r)m(t)C -
where




     r  - Kepone concentration  in  the  biomass             [yg/g]




     m  - biomass concentration                          [g/&]




     t  - time                                            [days]




     K  - assimilation coefficient                        [I/day]




     r  - biomass assimilation  capacity                   [yg/g]




     C  - dissolved Kepone  concentration                  [yg/£]




     K  - depuration coefficient                          [I/day]









The only assumption made in  this analysis  was  that the biomass




assimilation capacity, r , was  taken  to be much greater than the




Kepone concentration in the  biomass,  r.   Results of this analysis




for oysters (Crassostrea, virginica)  are  presented in Figure X.

-------
                         0 9
                   .0—0-
          s
             9
 CD
 3.


 2
 cc
 K~
 CO
 O
 co
 co
 ^
 Qc
 CJ
 CO
 LU
 D
 g

 CO
 LU
 cr

 LLJ
 z
 O
 Q_
 LLI
          \
            ••"*-        *  \
      .  «•
                      0.03 /ig/l
1C-2
10
-1
34 //g/g
         0
              5         10

            ACCUMULATION
     0      10      20      30      40       50     60

     -«—ACCUMULATION—£»--*	DEPURATION	>-

                        TIME, days
                               15        20        25

                               -^—DEPURATION—>-
                             TIME, days
                              FIGURE X

CALCULATION  FOR  THE ASSIMILATION AND DEPURATION  OF KEPONE IN OYSTI

-------
From these results, it can be shown  that  the  bio-ecological




phenomena of assimilation and depuration  can  be  modeled  utili-




zing Langmuir kinetics if data for  the  evaluation  of  the relevant




coefficients is available.









CONCLUSION




     The equations presented in  this  report  appear to be suffi-




ciently realistic as a first approximation  in representing the




various phenomena under consideration.  At  the present time,  the




analysis is being extended to treat  the ecological system as  a




continuum using trophic length as  a  metric.   Given the inputs




from the sources in the vicinity  of  Bailey's  Bay,  the transport




in the non-saline and saline regions  of the  James  estuary and




the distribution of suspended solids  and  Kepone, the  food chain




model is being enlarged to include  the  uptake and  excretion of




Kepone in the various trophic levels  and  the  predation and




feeding associated with these levels.   At this time,  the saline




and non-saline regions of the estuary are being combined into




one continuous solution.  Steady  state  conditions, which repre-




sent average conditions during various  seasons of  the year, are




being assumed for these preliminary  steps of  the analysis.









ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS




     The research work described  in  this  report is sponsored




by Gulf Breeze Research Laboratory,  Sabine  Island, Gulf Breeze




Florida, Grant Number R804563.   The  participation  of  Gerald L.

-------
Schnoor is acknowledged.  Various phases of the computations




were performed by Cherng-Ju Kim and George A.  Leahy, research




assistants in the Environmental Engineering and Science Program




at Manhattan College.

-------
INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY
OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
Technical Report No. 35
SURVIVAL, DURATION OF LARVAL STAGES, AND SIZE OF
POSTLARVAE OF GRASS SHRIMP, PALAEMONETES PUGIO,

REARED FROM KEPONE®  CONTAMI1

POPULATIONS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY
REARED FROM KEPONE^  CONTAMINATED AND UNCONTAM I NATED
By

Anthony J. Provenzano, Principal Investigator

Kathleen B. Schmitz

and
Mark A. Boston
Final Report
Prepared for the
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Research Laboratory
Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561
Under
Contract No. CF-6991106J
S'uc>mi,t'z&3. Dy tns
Old Dominion University Research Foundation
Norfolk, Virginia 23503
April 1977

-------
                          ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     Tom Leggett assisted in the field collection and laboratory
rearings.  We are indebted to Mark Grussendorf, Carl Kinsman,
and especially to Karen Kinsman and Kim Blake for their valuable
assistance in the computer analysis of the data.  We thank
Drs.  Michael Bender,  Robert Huggett,  and especially Mr. M. Keith
Ward of Virginia Institute of Marine  Science for providing the
analyses for Kepone.
                                  11

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                            Page

  I.   INTRODUCTION  	     1

 11 .   METHODS	     2

      Analytical Methods  	     5
      Statistical Analyses   	     6

III.   RESULTS	     8

 IV.   DISCUSSION    	    15

  V.   CONCLUSIONS	    19

 VI.   RECOMMENDATIONS	    20

      REFERENCES    	    21




                          List of Figures


Figure

  1       Location of collection sites   	     3

  2       Hatching unit	     4
                           List of Tables
Table
          Concentration of Kepone (ppm) in samples of ?.
           p-ugio arranged by collection site   ....

          Survival of reared larvae of Pa.la.enone-es pugio
           from IS females collected from six sites

          Anova table for survival with arcsine transfor-
           mation   	

          Mean time to metamorphosis in days for larvae
           o f ?.  " "j. a -i o    	
10
11
                                                        (cont'd.)
                                 ill

-------
                    List of Tables - Concluded


Table                                                       Page

  5       Anova table for time to metamorphosis  ...      12

  6       Length (in mm) of postlarvae of P.  pugio
           reared from six sites	      13

  7       Anova table for postlarval length   ....      14

  8       Extraction and analysis dates,  sample weights,
           and volumes of frozen samples  analyzed for
           Kepone	      16
                                 IV

-------
   SURVIVAL, DURATION OF LARVAL STAGES, AND SIZE OF POSTLARVAE
                                                            1?)
    OF GRASS SHRIMP, PALAEMONETES PUG1C,  REARED FROM KEPONE
           CONTAMINATED AND UNCONTAMINATED POPULATIONS
                        IN CHESAPEAKE BAY
                         I.   INTRODUCTION

     	0_ „.. ._^	    (chlordecone) into the James River at
Hopewell, Virginia has created far reaching environmental, economic,
and potential health problems for the people of Virginia and
neighboring areas.  Kepone,  like other chlorinated insecticides,
is highly cumulative and persists in estuarine organisms.  Oysters,
grass shrimp, and fishes have concentrated Kepone from 425 to
20,000 times the concentration in surrounding water (Ha'nsen, et.
al., 1976).
     Palasmonetes pugio is one of the key components in Atlantic
coast estuaries.  A major fraction of the total energy flow through
the food web of these estuarine communities passes through its
populations (Welsh, 1975).   In 1975, broods of larvae of P. pugio
obtained from stocks in the  Lafayette River, Norfolk, Virginia,
were reared in the laboratory of the Institute of Oceanography,
Old Dominion University,  in  an attempt to define the environmental
requirements for the larvae  and to establish conditions necessary
for consistent success.  Erratic results under apparently constant
laboratory conditions were obtained.  Samples of P.  pugio from the
same locality sent to the Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf
Breeze,  Florida for experimentation, were found to contain sig-
nificant amounts of Kepone,  suggesting the possibility that Kepone
may affect larval survival.
     The present study was undertaken to determine whether, under
standard laboratory conditions,  broods of larvae of this species
obtained from Kepone contaminated and uncontaminated sites in the
Chesapeake Bay might vary in larval survival,  time required for  .
larval development, and size of post larvae.   Inasmuch as variability

-------
among females had not been established, an attempt was made to
evaluate the contribution of this source of variation as well.

                           II.   METHODS

     Ovigerous grass shrimp were collected with a pushnet from six
Virginia localities in the Chesapeake Bay region (fig. 1):  (1) the
Lafayette River in urban Norfolk, (2) bridge pilings at Gloucester
Point, at the mouth of the York River, (3) Lynnhaven Inlet, Vir-
ginia Beach, at the Chesapeake Bay mouth, (4) small inlet at
Fleeton, Virginia, near the mouth of the Potomac River, (5) the
James River Bridge, Portsmouth, Virginia, and (6) the western end
of the Route 301 bridge across the Potomac River.  These localities
were selected in an attempt to include Kepone contaminated and
uncontaminated sites, but the results of analyses establishing
Kepone levels in the populations from these sites were not avail-
able until well after the rearing experiments were completed.
     Females with embryos in advanced state of development were
sorted from the general catch and placed 'into individual hatching
units.  Each unit was maintained in a separate one-gallon (3.8-
liter) aerated aquarium containing filtered natural seawater
(25 °/oo S) at ambient temperature (22° to 26° C).   Water was
changed daily, and hatching usually occurred within 48 hours
after collection.  Hatching units were constructed of 10-cm lengths
of 7-cm diameter clear plastic tubing (fig.  2).   A layer of plas-
tic mesh (onion bag netting) was stretched across the bottom of
each tube and attached with aquarium sealant;  a second layer
(several centimeters above the bottom) supported the female.
The double mesh prevented the female from capturing and eating
her newly hatched larvae which escaped through the bottom of the
unit.
     Replicate groups of 33 larvae were obtained from each of the
three isolated females from each site; each group was placed into
a 20-cm-diameter glass culture dish containing one liter of arti-
ficial seawater (Instant Ocean, Aquarium Systems, Inc. Eastlake,

-------
       WASHINGTON
                        1   Lafayette River

                        2  Gloucester Point

                        3  Lynnhaven Inlet

                        4  Fleeton (near  Reedsville)

                        5  James River Bridge  (west side)

                        6  Potomac River  (west bank at Rt.  301)
SCALE:  IN MILES
0            25
                                                          37°_
         	VIRGINIA	
         NORTH CAROLINA  76C,20'
 Figure 1.   Location of collection sites.

-------
10 era
                                                S cm  CULTURE DISH
                                                     COVER
                                                SHRIMP
                                                DOUBLE BOTTOM
                                                  ONION NET
                                                SUPPORT LEG
           Figure 2.   Hatching unit.

-------
 Ohio)  at  25  ppt prepared with  tap water.   Larvae  from  each  female
 were reared  separately  in  order  to  estimate  variation  due to  par-
 entage.   Thus, six  dishes,  each  with  33  larvae, represented each
 site.
     Larvae  were  reared in  an  incubator  at 25° C  in  the  dark.   Food
 consisted of freshly hatched San Francisco Bay Brand Arterr.ia  nauplii
 at an  initial daily concentration of  10  nauplii/ml of  medium.   Lar-
 vae were  observed,  counted, and  changed  to freshly prepared bowls
 each day.
     Newly metamorphosed post  larvae  were removed daily, measured
 from tip  of  nostrum to tip  of  telson  (using  a dissecting microscope
 and a  millimeter  rule, estimated error = ± 0.2 mm), and  frozen  for
 Kepone analysis.
     From each collection site the  following samples were frozen
 and transported to the Virginia  Institute of Marine Science,
 Gloucester Point,  for Kepone analysis:
     a.   Ovigerous females
     b.   Eggs removed from  the pleopods of additional  females
     c.   Non-ovigerous females which  had recently hatched larvae
     d.   Larvae newly hatched  in the  laboratory
     e.   Laboratory reared post larvae.

                        Analytical Methods
              (Adapted from report by M.  Keith Ward)
     Frozen samples were delivered to the Virginia Institute of
Marine Science during the period through August 1976 for Kepone
analysis.   One third of the samples were analyzed during the
period July through September 1976 and the remainder in February
1977.
     Each total  sample was  extracted with three successive 20-ml
portions of toluene in ethylacetate (1:4) using a Polytron.   The
Polytron generator head was rinsed with a few milliliters of
extracting solvent to  minimize  Kepone loss.   The  sample tube was
centrifuged after  each extraction and the supernatant solution

-------
was passed through anhydrous granular sodium sulfate into a 50-ml
screwcap culture tube.  The extract was concentrated to less than
1 ml using a gentle stream of nitrogen and a warm water bath.
     A Florisil column consisting of 1.6 gram Florisil covered by
1.6 gram anhydrous granular sodium sulfate in a glass column
(dimensions 100 mm * 30 mm, Corning ^412160) was used in an attempt
to remove components that might interfere with Kepone.  The Florisil
column was wet with Solvent I (2 percent methanol, 4 percent ben-
zene, in hexane).  The sample was transferred to the column and
the sample tube rinsed five times with 0.5 ml Solvent I.  Seven
milliliters of Solvent I was collected as Fraction I and discarded.
This was followed by 30 ml Solvent II (Fraction II) consisting of
1 percent methanol, 2 percent acetonitrile,  4 percent benzene in
hexane.   Fraction II (which contains Kepone) was analyzed for
Kepone by electron capture gas chromatography.
     The P.  pugio samples were quantitated for Kepone on either of
two gas chromatographs:   a Varian Model 2700 equipped with two
3H(tritium) electron capture detectors operated at 220° C, and a
column temperature of 210° C;  or a Tracor Model 222 equipped with
two linearized high-temperature 53Ni detectors operated at 350° C
and a column temperature of 210° C.  The samples were analyzed on
at least two of the following columns:   3 percent OV-1; 1.5 per-
cent OV-17 + 1.95 percent OV-210,  or 4 percent SE-30 + 6 percent
OV-210,  on 80 to 100 mesh Gas Chrom Q or Variaport 30.  The column
dimensions were 6 mm * 2 mm *  183 mm.   Values for Kepone con-
centrations presented in table 1 represent the mean of two readings.

                       Statistical Analyses
     Three parameters were analyzed statistically in order to
evaluate intrasite variation due to parentage and intersite varia-
tion of  the laboratory-reared larvae.   These were (1) survival
of laboratory-reared larvae, (2) time to metamorphosis (larval
duration),  and (3) length of postlarvae (rostrum-telson) at
metamorohosis.

-------
  Table 1.  Concentration of Kepone (ppm) in samples of P. pugio arranged by
            collection site (courtesy of Virginia Institute of Marino Science).
Site
1
Lafayette
River
°y^rous 0.039
1 eina les
Kggs 0.36
Females having n 1Q
i . i i U . JLo
hatched eggs
Newly hatched o 11
zoo at;
Post larvae 0.011
2 3
Gloucester
Point Lynnhaven
0.030 0.031
0.044 *
<0.008 0.029
<0.007 0.021
<0.007 <0.001
45 6
James Potomac
Fleeton Rivei" River

-------
     Survival data were treated with a two-way nested analysis of
variance (anova) (Sokal and Rohlf, 1969) following arcsine trans-
formation of percent survival.  Data for development time were
analyzed with two-way nested analysis of variance and covariance
including repeated measures (Dixon, 1975) on a DEC system 10 com-
puter.   Data for post larval length were analyzed in the same
manner as developmental time.
     A Pearson correlation coefficient (Nie et al.,  1970) was cal-
culated in order to determine the degree of relationship between
postlarval length and developmental time.

                          III.  RESULTS

     Survival data for the 36 groups of larvae are presented in
table 2.   Analysis of variance of the survival data (table 3)
indicates that there is no evidence for significant difference
in survival of larvae among broods of different females from the
same collection site; nor is there significant difference in sur-
vival of reared larvae from the different sites (p > 0.05).
     Data for time required for the larvae to reach metamorphosis
are given in table 4.  Analysis of variance (table 5) indicates a
highly significant variance component (p « 0.001)  for larval
duration among broods reared from different females representing
the same site.   The variation in larval duration among broods
reared from the six different collection sites is not significant
(p > 0.05).
     Length data for postlarvae obtained from the experimental
rearings are presented in table 6, and the analysis of variance
of these data in table 7.   The intrasite (parental)  variation
again is seen to be highly significant (p « 0.001),  and the
intersite variation is not significant (p > 0.05).
     Larvae which metamorphosed earliest were generally smaller
than those of longer larval duration.   Therefore a Pearson
correlation coefficient was calculated in order to evaluate  the •
possible relationship between larval duration and length of

-------
   Table;  2.   Survival  oC reaied larvae  of  Palaemonetes pug-to from 18 females collected from six
              sites  (F   = identification number of individual female).
i\e;>l i c;itcs
Bow 1 A
No. ff survivors
1'ercc-nt survival
Arcs i nc /p
ikv,;l 3
No. of survivors
I'j rcfin l survival
A re SHU; Wp"
Site i
Lafayette- River
«:1 ":2 l:3
31 31 50
93.9 93.9 (»0.9
75.7 7S.7 72.4
30 33 31
90.9 100.0 
-------
Table 3.  Anova table for survival with  arcsine  transformation.
          Estimates of variance components  are expressed  as
          percentages (n = 2 bowls; a =  6 sites;  b  =  3  females)
   Source of Variation
                            df
SS
MS
Groups (among sites)
                             5   956.66    191.33    2.36  n.s
Subgroups (among females)   12   974.34     81.20    2.32  n.s
Error (within females)
                            18   631.09     35.06
                                           F>05[5,12J  =  3.11

                                           F 05[12,18] =2.34
Variance components:

Error; between measurements   o2   0- r^
  on each female            = S    3o'06
Among females within sites = Sir.A
                              oL/ri
                                    MS  ,        - MS  . ,  .
                                      subgroups	within
                                              n
                                    81.20 - 35.06
                                          o
                                  = 23.07 (30. 16f0)
                   MS       - MS
Among sites = S| =   groups nb '
                   191.33 - 81.20
                 = 18.36 (24^c
S2
            S| = 35.06 + 23.07 + 18.36 = 76.49
                                                             10

-------
Table 4.   Mean time to metamorphosis in days for larvae of ?. pugio
Site No.
I
Lafayette
River
II
Gloucester
Point
III
Lynnhaven
' - iv"
Fleeton
V
James
River
VI
Potomac
River
Female No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No . Larvae
Metamorphosed
61
64
61
62
58
44
57
57
49
63
63
58
60
59
60
57
53
48
Mean
(days)
13.1
13.5
14.2
12.9
18.1
18.0
17.5
15.4
17.8
16.0
15.1
21.7
15.6
15.6
15.1
17.1
14.2
16.8
Standard
Deviation
0.8
1.2
2.1
1.1
3.0
1.8
1.9
1.3
1.6
1.7
1.0
3.2
1.3
0.9
0.6
2.4
1.2
2.1
                                                              11

-------
                          Table 5.   Anova table  for time to metamorphosis.
   Source

    Sites

   Females
(w i th i n si tes

    Error
                          Sum of  Squares    Degrees of Freedom   Mean Square
                                                      F
                           ],756.84201
     1.84500
3,187.98019
                                                   12
                                                  1016
                                      351.36840    1.3825  n.s
254.15375   80.99806 ***
  3.13778
         n.s.   Not  significant  (p  >  0.05)

         ***    Highly  significant  (p <  0.001)
                                          F 05[5,12] = 3.11

                                          F_001[12,«] = 2.74
10

-------
Table 6.   Length (in mm) of postlarvae of ?.  pugio reared from
          six sites.

Site No.

Lafayette
River
II
Gloucester
Point
III
Lynhaven
IV
Fleeton
V
James
River
VI
Potomac
River

Female No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

No. of Larvae
61
64
61
62
58
43
56
57
49
63
63
58
60
59
60
57
53
48
Mean Length
(mm)
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.5
7.8
7.6
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.1
7.0
8.2
7.4
7.1
7.3
7.4
7.0
7.3
Standard
Deviation
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
                                                             13

-------
                  Table 7.   Anova table for postlarval length.
Source
S
Fe
(with
K
i tes
rna
in
rr
les
sites)
or
Sum
4

1
67
16
4
of Squares
.74599
.07723
.22859
Degrees of Freedom
5
12
1014
Mean
8.
5.
0.
Square F
34920 1.49366 n.s.
58977 34.51303 ***
16196
n.s.   Not significant (p > 0.05)




***   Highly significant (p <  0.001)
F
[5,12]  =  3.11

-------
postlarvae.  The correlation coefficient was 0.51 at the 0.00001
significance level indicating a weak, but significant relation-
ship between time to metamorphosis and size at metamorphosis.
     Sample size and extraction and analysis dates for frozen
samples analyzed for Kepone are presented in table 8, and the
Kepone values for these samples, arranged by size, are given in
table 1.  These results could not be analyzed statistically because
of lack of replication due to small sample size.  [Although recov-
ery and reproducibility data could not be obtained for these
samples, oyster samples fortified at 0.3 ppm and fish (bream)
samples fortified at 0.1 ppm extracted with a Polytron gave
recoveries of 84 percent and 80 to 94 percent respectively
(M.K. Ward, personal communication).]  Nevertheless,  table 1
illustrates that samples from sites 1 and 5 (the Lafayette River
and James Ri.ver respectively) exhibited high Kepone levels rela-
tive to the other sites.  Laboratory reared postlarvae from all
sites showed very low (or undetectable) Kepone concentrations.

                          IV.  DISCUSSION

     ?.  pug-Lo is known to be more Kepone-tolerant than several
other estuarine organisms.   Acute 96-hour toxicity bioassays
showed the LCsg (expressed in micrograms per liter)  to be 6.6
for spot,  70 for sheepshead minnows,  10 for a mysid crustacean,
121 for P.  pug-Co,  and 210 for the blue crab,  Callinectes  sapidus
(Hansen, et al., 1976).   At least one other species  of Palxenone-es
has been shown to have populations resistant  to a variety of
organochlorine,  organophosphorous,  and carbamate insecticides
(Naqvi and Ferguson,  1970).
     Chemical analyses of samples revealed Kepone concentrations
from the six sites ranging from undetectable  to moderately high
levels.   Intersite ranges were as follows:   <_ 0.005  to 0.63 ppm
for ovigerous females;  <_ 0.003 to 0.47 ppm for eggs;  <_ 0.008 to
0.57 ppm for females  which had recently hatched larvae;  <_ 0.007
to 0.11 ppm for newly hatched zoeae;  and <  0.001 to  < 0.015 ppm
                                                               15

-------
Table 8.  Extraction and analysis dates, sample weights, and volumes of frozen
          samples analyzed for Kepone (data courtesy of Virginia Institute of
          Marine Science).

Site Sample
1 Newly hatched zooea
Ovigerous females
Females having hatched eggs
Eggs
Post 1 arvae
2 Newly hatched zooea
Ovigerous females
Females having hatched eggs
UtfLJS
Pos 1 1 arvae
3 Newly hatched zooea
Ovigerous females
Females having hatched eggs
li' ir f ro
''iyh,-^
Post 1 arvae
4 Newly hatched zooea
Ovigerous females
Females having hatched eggs
Eggs
Post larvae
Extraction
Date
02-08-77
09-15-76
08-04-76
07-2G-76
02-08-77
02-03-77
10-20-76
10-20-76
02-10-77
02-09-77
02-07-77
02-01-77
09-15-76
02-10-77
02-09-77
02-03-77
02-01-77
09-08-76
02-30-77
02-07-77
Gas Chrorn
Analysis Date
02-11-77
09-21-76
08-04-76
07-26-76
02-11-77
02-11-77
02-11-77
02-11-77
02-15-77
.02-15-77
02-15-77
02-15-77
09-21-76
02-15-77
02-14-77
02-16-77
02-16-77
09-09-76
02-16-77
02-17-77
Sample
Weight
(gm)
0.
3.
2.
1.
0.
1.
3.
2.
1.
0.
1.
2.
2.
2.
0.
0.
2.
2.
0.
0.
65
11
70
75
20
37
51
28
03
37
77
88
62
07
34
85
00
89
20
24
Sample
Vol ume
(ml)
17
29
30
29
21
19
29
29
21
24
21
19
29
25
22
18
15
29
22
20
.5
.5
.0
.5
.5
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
. 0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
                                                                   (co'nt 'd. )

-------
    Table 8.  Extraction and analysis dates,  sample weights,  and volumes of frozen
              samples analyzed for Kepone (data courtesy of Virginia Institute of
              Marine Science) - concluded.
Si to
 G


S amp 1 e
Newly hatched isooea
Ovlgerous females
Females having hatched eggs
J.'.'ggS
Post 1 arvae
Newly hatched zooea
Qvigerous females
Females having hatched eggs
Eggs
Post 1 arvae

Extraction
Date
02-02-77
09-06-76
09-06-76
09-06-76
02-09-77
02-02-77
09-07-76
09-07-76
02-10-77
02-09-77

Gas Chrom
Analysis Date
02-16-77
09-09-76
09-09-76
09-09-76
02-17-77
02-16-77
09-09-76
09-09-76
02-16-77
02-17-77
Sample
Weight
( gm )
2.09
2.08
1.90
1.85
0.22
1.08
2.85
3.82
1.24
0.05
S amp 1 e
Volume
(ml )
12.5
30.0
29.5
29.5
22.0
20.0
29.5
29.5
25.5
17.0

-------
for laboratory-reared postlarvae.  Not surprisingly, the highest
levels were found in samples from the heavily contaminated James
River and the second highest levels from the Lafayette River,
located near the mouth of the James.  While detectable amounts
of Kepone were found in at least some samples from the other sites,
the levels were generally low,  and the populations remote from the
James may be considered relatively uncontaminated.  In spite of
these wide ranges in concentrations we were able to detect no
difference in larval response (lethal or sublethal) attributable
to the geographic origin of the larvae.  However, due to the
limitations of the Kepone analytical technique (minimum sample
size = 1 gram),  individual females from which larvae were reared
could not be analyzed for Kepone concentration.  The analyzed
samples were a composite of several animals collected from the
same population, and the determined concentrations were average
values.  There is, therefore, no way to trace each laboratory-
reared brood to a specific parental Kepone concentration.  Thus
it is possible that the reared larvae from a given collection site
may have arisen from females in which the Kepone levels were not
representative of the general population.

     As mentioned earlier, this study was occasioned by the occur-
rence of erratic results in larval rearings from an area known to
be contaminated.  The erratic results were not obtained,  and
therefore were not explained, by this study.   The purpose of our
field sampling was simply to determine whether the areas from
which the reared animals were collected were subject to Kepone
contamination.  A statistical sampling plan was not attempted,
but clearly should be in order  to ascertain representative contam-
ination levels and individual variability in contamination of ani-
mals obtained from a given area.   We cannot eliminate the possibility
that larvae reared for this study came from relatively "clean"
individuals,  and hence exhibited no immediately observable effects.
     The temperature and salinity combination used for the larval
rearings in this study has been determined near optimum for this,
species, at least for stocks from lower Chesapeake Bay (Floyd,
                                                                18

-------
personal communication), and the larvae always received sufficient
uncontaminated food.  Hence the laboratory-reared larvae were
relatively unstressed.  Field hatched larvae from eggs, or females
with Kepone residues near the highest reported here, might be sub-
jected to environmental stresses, such as temperature and/or sal-
inity extremes, contaminated food,  etc.   Thus synergistic effects,
unexamined here,  may be operating under field conditions.  In
addition, although the Kepone concentrations detected in this
study may not have had direct observable effects on larval devel-
opment of P.  pug-Co reared in the laboratory, there may well be
biomagnification effects upon predators of this species, a topic
outside the scope of this study.
     Although this experiment was not designed specifically to
study parental variation, highly significant differences in larval
development time and post larval length were found among broods
from single sites.  If we had not accounted for variation due to
parentage (by rearing broods separately) we might have falsely
concluded that that variation was due to site of origin.

                          V.  CONCLUSIONS

     Larvae of Palaemonetes pugio obtained from three adults
collected at  each of six sites within Chesapeake Bay,  when reared
under controlled laboratory conditions,  showed no significant
differences in larval survival,  larval duration,  or length of
postlarvae attributable to site of  origin.
     Egg-bearing adults of P.  pugio,  females which had recently
hatched larvae,  eggs,  newly hatched larvae,  and laboratory-reared
postlarvae,  when analyzed for Kepone, showed variation in con-
centration ranging from undetectable  to  levels of 0.6 ppm.   Pop-
ulations from the James River and nearby Lafayette River showed
the highest concentrations of Kepone; distant populations showed
lower levels.   Laboratory-reared postlarvae  representing all six
populations had very low or nondetectable Kepone concentrations.
     Survival rates-among broods from individual  females ranged
from 61 to 100 percent,  but did not differ significantly among

                                                                 19

-------
 females from any one site; nor did the mean survival among  larvae
 differ from site to site.
     Mean time to metamorphosis ranged among broods from 12.9 to
 21.7 days.  Parental variation in this parameter was highly sig-
 nificant,  whereas site variation was not.
     Mean postlarval length which ranged from 7.0 to 8.2 mm
 exhibited significant intrasite variation, but intersite varia-
 tion was insignificant.
     There was a weak,  but significant relationship between time
 to metamorphosis and postlarval length at metamorphosis.

                       VI.  RECOMMENDATIONS

     1.  For successful continuation of analysis of Kepone in ?.
pugio ,  the previously described Polytron extraction method should
be evaluated for this substrate,  including recovery and repro-
ducibility studies.   Larger sample size would probably enhance
extraction efficiency.   Other methods, e.g., extraction utilizing
a micro-Soxhlet assembly, should be examined.   Finally, additional
modified means of sample cleanup may be necessary for future
routine analysis (M.K.  Ward,  personal communication),
     2.  Acute toxicity tests and long-term toxicity tests should
be determined on larvae in order to determine at which concentra-
tions Kepone has adverse effects on young stages of P.  pug-lo .
     3.  The present study showed significant  variation in responses
of larvae  from different females.   Obviously such effects should
not be  ignored in bioassay design.   A study of effects of parentage
on variation in larval  responses for P.  pug-Lo  should be conducted
in order to establish the minimum number of females which would
allow the  most reliable representation of populational  response.
     4.  A statistically designed sampling plan should be carried
out in  order to determine representative contamination levels  and
individual variability  in contamination of animals  living in a
given area.
                                                                 20

-------
                            REFERENCES

Dixon, W.J., ed.  1975.  Biomedical computer programs.  University
     of California Press, Los Angeles.  792 pp.
Hansen, D.J., Wilson, A.J., Nimno,  D.R., Schimmel,  S.C., and
     Bahner, L.H.  1976.  Kepone:  Hazard to aquatic organisms.
     Science, 193:528.
Naqvi, S.M. and Ferguson, D.E.  1970.   Levels of insecticide
     resistance in fresh-water shrimp, Palaemonetes kadiakensis.
     Trans. Amer. Fish Soc., 99:696-699.
Nie, N.H., Hull, C.H., Jenkins, J.G.,  Steinbrenner, K.,  and Bent,
     D.H.   1970.  Statistical package for the social sciences.
     McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.  675 pp.
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J.  1969.   Biometry.  W.H. Freeman and
     Company, San Francisco.  776 pp.
Welsh, B'.L.  1975.  The role of grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio  ,
     in a tidal marsh ecosystem.   Ecology,  56(3):513-530.
                                                               21

-------
Americal Society of Microbiology National Meeting
May 1978, Las Vegas, Nevada
         Fate and Effects of Kepone^ in Artificial
         Estuarine Ecosystems.  A. W. BOURQUIN,* P. H.
         PRITCHARD and H. L. FREDRICKSON.  U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, ERL, Gulf Breeze, Fl. 32561.
     Fate and effects of the pesticide Kepone were studied
in artificial ecosystems, containing water and sediment
from either Range Point salt marsh, FL or the James River,
VA.  Approximately 75-80% of ^C Kepone added (6.5 ppm) to
jthe systems accumulated in the detrital fraction.  Using
high pressure liquid chromatography and GC-mass spectral
analysis, we detected no transformation products with a
variety of experimental regimes including anaerobic or
aerobic conditions.  Neither the addition of glucose  (0.1%)
nor naphthalene (0.1%) stimulated the transformation of the
pesticide in analogous systems.  No ^CO^ was produced in
any experiment.  James River sediment with a history of
depone exposure was likewise ineffective.
     Effects of Kepone on microbial communities in these
artificial ecosystems were monitored by determining the
rate of C02 evolution and metabolite accumulation from
Mc-methyl parathion (MPS).   James River sediment systems
were more active than Range Point sediment system in the
metabolism of MPS to C02-  The presence of Kepone at con-
centrations of 0.6 mg/kg of sediment in either sediment
system reduced the degradation rate of MPS by 59% and 54%,
Respectively.  These studies indicate that Kepone, although
resistant to microbial attack, can be inhibitory to the
microbial community responsible for the degradation of oth-
jer pollutants in an artificial ecosystem.	

-------
                American Chemical Society National Meeting
                March 1978, Anaheim, California
    THE FATE OF 14C-KEPONE IN ESTUARINE MICROCOSMS.  R.L. Garnas,  A.W. Bourquin, and
    P.H. Pritchard.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research
Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561.

     Following the contamination of the James River with Kepone, laboratory data concern-
ing its fate in the estuary were necessary for corrective actions and mathematical model-
ing efforts.  The movement and transformation potentials of 14C-Kepone were studied in
static and continuous flow estuarine microcosms.  Biotic and abiotic transformation and
volatilization of the chemical were not apparent in these studies.  Following its adsorp-
tion from water in these model systems, Kepone desorbed from salt marsh sediments and
James River sediments.  While this desorption was independent of environmental water tem-
peratures and salinities in sediment-water systems, the Kepone concentration in the water
column was proportional to its concentration in sediment.  Some James River sediments re-
tained high levels of radiolabeled chemical following conventional solvent extraction.

     Burrowing polychaetes (Arenicola cristata) were added to salt marsh sediment in larg
er continuous flow systems to define the effect of macrobenthic biota on the fate of Ke-
pone.  These polychaetes accumulated high residues of Kepone and died; although the tis-
sues were allowed to decompose in the system, the accumulated Kepone was not as available
for desorption and washout from the system as compared to Kepone adsorbed to sediment.

-------