OCLC24225633
United States Office of December 1989
Environmental Protection The Administrator
Agency Washington DC 20460
£EPA Strategic Targeted Activities for Results System
FY 1990 Goals, Objectives,
Commitments, and Measures
-------
INTRODUCTION
This document identifies the measures and commitments (targets) contained in
the Strategic Targeted Activities for Results System (STARS). These measures
define the type of activity and identify targets that have been established
for these measures. The Headquarters Program Offices and the respective
Regional.Offices have negotiated to established targets for those measures
with targets. In a few instances (noted by asterisks) the target has not been
resolved between the Headquarters Program Office and the respective Regional
Office. In many cases, definitions have been provided which clarify measures.
The Accountability Systems Branch of the Office of Management Systems and
Evaluation compiles a quarterly report of actual accomplishments.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
GLNPO Library Collection (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
STRATEGIC TARGETED ACTIVITIES FOR RESULTS SYSTEM
FY 1990 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, COMMITMENTS, AND MEASURES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OFFICE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
PAGE
MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS OAR - 1
TARGETS OAR - 23
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM OAR - 67
OFFICE OF WATER
MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS OW - 1
TARGETS OW - 47
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM OW - 91
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS OSWER - 1
TARGETS OSWER - 32
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM OSWER - 58
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS OPTS - 1
TARGETS OPTS - 10
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM OPTS - 20
-------
OFFICE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS
PAGE
OECM
OECM
OGC -
1
13
-------
Office of Air and Radiation
FY 1990 GOCMs
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Maintain continued progress
toward attainment of NAAQS.
Implement the ozone/CD
policy toward attainment of
the NAAQS.
Report nonattainment areas on a pollutant-by-pollutant
basis and identify classification changes.
Report on status of SIP revisions for those areas that
received SIP calls in June, 1988. (This measure
includes the activities that the States were to complete
within 12 months from the receipt of the workplan but
did not complete in FY 1989.)
For each area, report:
u. number of remaining deficient regulations, missing
regulations, other identified SIP deficiencies
a. number of final State submittals received by Region
for:
- corrected deficient regulations against target
- missing regulations against target
- other corrected SIP deficiencies against target
b. status report on updating emissions inventory to
1987 or 1988 base year.
A-l
A-2
04
By Region
Ql Only
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-1
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards/Office of Mobile Sources
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Implement the ozone/CO
policy toward attainment of
NAAQS (continued).
Report on status of adequate SIPs for each ozone and CO
SIP call area.
OZONE/CO SPREADSHEET ITEMS*
a. Governor's commitment received to submit a SIP,
against targets.
b. Draft of emission control requirements submitted
(% reduction).
c. Draft measures submitted.
d. Draft demonstration plan submitted to Regional
office.
e. Public hearings scheduled, against targets.
f. Final plan adopted by State Board or Legislature.
g. Final plan submitted to Regional office against
targets.
h. SIP enters HQ review.
i. Final SIP published in Federal Register.
*QAR will not report on these spreadsheet items until
the post-87 ozone policy is final.
Report on implementation of State/Local Vehicle
Inspection Programs:
ul. Number of programs as of 10/1/89.
u2. Number of programs implemented since 10/1/89,
against targets.
Report on audits of State/Local Vehicle Inspection
Programs. Report number of programs:
a. Audited since 10/1/89, against targets.
b. Operating at an acceptable level.
c. With problems identified but not being adequately
addressed.
d. With corrections underway.
e. Programs never evaluated.
A-2
A-3
A-4
01,2,3,4
By SIP
call area
Q2, Q4
By Region
Q2,Q4
By Region
OAR-2
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SIMS CODE FREQUENCY
Implement the ozone/CD
policy toward attainment of
NAAQS (continued) .
Report for all areas with ozone measurements greater
than the level of the NAAQS the design value for the
most recent 3-year period for ozone and 2-year period
for GO for which data are available.
Report for VOC sources in nonattainment areas:
u. Number of Class A VOC SIP sources and VOC NSPS
sources.
a. Number of sources in violation, meeting schedules,
unknown, at end of quarter.
b. Number of inspections of flagged VOC sources,
against quarterly targets. (Data are lagged one
quarter.)
c. Status of VOC significant violators. (Status of
Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure A/E-24) :
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 120 days.
- Number addressed within 270 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
- Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.
A-5
A/E-7
04
By Area
Ql,2,3,4
Ql,2,3,4
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-3
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SEMS CODE FREQUENCY
Continue progress toward
completion and
implementation of SIPs for
Group I areas and for Group
II and III areas that have
measured violations of the
PM10 NAAQS. Continue
progress toward completion
and implementation of an
adequate PM^g ambient
network.
Report on the submission of adequate SIPs for Group I
areas:
GROUP I PM1(? SIP SPREADSHEET ITEMS
u. Number of Group I areas at 10/1/89.
a. Control strategy demonstration completed, against
targets.
b. Public hearings held.
c. SIP enters HQ review against targets.
d. Final SIP published in Federal Register.
Report on demonstration of SIP adequacy for Group II
areas:
a. Sufficient PM10 data collected for 40 CFR Part 50
Appendix K analysis.
b. Attainment status of area demonstrated.
Report on the development of SIPs for Group II and III
areas with violations:
GROUP II and III PM10 SIP SPREADSHEET
u. Number of Group II and III areas with violations at
10/1/89.
a. SIP development plan submitted, against targets.
b. Control strategy demonstration completed, against
targets.
c. Public hearings held.
d. SIP enters HQ review, against targets.
e. Final SIP published in Federal Register.
Report number of Group II and III areas with violations
newly discovered after 10/1/89.
A-8
A-9
A-9
A-10
01,2,3,4
By Group
I Area
Q4 Only
By Group
II Area
Ql,2,3,4
By Group
II Area
Q2,Q4
By Region
OAR-4
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SIMS CODE FREQUENCY
Continue progress toward
completion and
implementation of SIPs for
Group I areas and for Group
II areas that have measured
violations of the PM^Q
NAAQS. Implement SIP
revisions in rural fugitive
dust areas in accordance
with the rural fugitive
dust policy. Continue
progress toward completion
and implementation of an
adequate PM1o ambient
network (continued).
Report on data reporting from PM10 networks:
u. Universe: number of PM10 sites in the approved NAMS
PM^Q network.
a. Number of NAMS sites in the network which reported
data to National Air Data Branch by 120 days after
the end of the calendar quarter against targets.
b. Of NAMS sites reported in a., number of sites having
at least 75%' data capture based on the approved
sampling frequency against targets.
A-12
Ql Only
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-5
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Continue progress toward
completion and
implementation of SIPs for
Group I areas and for Group
II areas that have measured
violations of the PM10
NAAQS. Continue progress
toward completion and
implementation of an
adequate PM^o ambient
network (continued).
Report on Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) sources
with existing SIP and NSPS regulations in Group I and II
areas:
u. Number of Class A TSP SIP sources and TSP NSPS
sources.
a. Number of sources in violation, meeting schedules,
unknown at end of quarter.
b. Number of inspections of flagged TSP sources in
Group I and II areas, against quarterly targets.
(Data are lagged one quarter.)
c. Status of TSP significant violators. (Status of
Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure A/E-24):
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 120 days.
- Number addressed within 270 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
- Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.
A/E-13
Ql,2,3,4
Ql,2,3,4
01,2,3,4
By Region
01,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-6
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Oualitv Plannina and Standards
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Fully approved and
implemented sulfur dioxide
(SO2) SIP control strategy
in every State.
Report on progress of sulfur dioxide (SC^) rulemaking
actions. For each type of action, report the number of
spreadsheet items completed .
TYPES OF ACTIONS
- Source emission limits for stacks not in compliance
with Section 123.
- SIP revisions:
— those in existing and newly designated
nonattainment areas (Part D) , and
— those in response to SIP call or State-initiated
in attainment or unclassified areas (Section 110) .
ITEMS
b.
c.
d.
e.
f .
Air quality, meteorology, and emissions database
submitted.
Modeling demonstration submitted.
Public hearings held, against targets.
Final plan submitted to Regional office.
SIP enters HQ review, against targets.
Final SIP published in Federal Register.
A-14
Ql Only
Q2,Q4
By Region
OAR-7
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Fully approved and
implemented sulfur dioxide
(SO2) SIP control strategy
in every State (continued) .
Report for SO2 sources in SO2 nonattainment areas:
u. Number of Class A SO2 SIP sources and SO2 NSPS
sources.
a. Number of sources in violation, meeting schedules,
unknown at end of quarter.
b. Number of inspections of flagged S02 sources,
against quarterly targets. (Data are lagged one
quarter.)
c. Status of SO2 significant violators. (Status of
Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure A/E-24) :
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 120 days.
- Number addressed within 270 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
- Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.
Report on the status of SO2 sources with continuous
emission monitoring (CEM) requirements:
a. Number of units requiring CEMs.
b. Number of units with CEM installed, operating and
reporting, and for which EPA is processing Excess
Emission Reports.
A/E-15
A/E-16
Ql,2,3,4
Ql,2,3,4
01,2,3,4
By Region
01,2,3,4
By Region
01,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-8
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
All State and major
independent local agencies
have identifiable programs
adequate to implement air
toxics regulations and to
carry out activities as
described in the multi-year
development plans (MYDP)
consistent with the
National Air Toxics
Strategy and OAR guidance.
Report the universe of agencies actively working on
MYDPs.
Report status of overall adequacy of MYDPs:
a. Number of adequate MYDPs, against targets.
b. Number of MYDPs which are not adequate.
Report status of overall implementation for all MYDPs:
a. Number of MYDPs with adequate implementation,
against targets.
b. Number of MYDPs for which implementation is not
adequate.
Of agencies actively working on MYDPs, report:
a. Number of agencies developing comprehensive
regulations pertaining to existing sources of air
toxics.
b. Number of agencies implementing cornprehensive
regulations pertaining to existing sources of air
toxics.
c. Number of agencies with no definite plans for
rulemaking.
Report work under the high risk point source initiatives
program:
u. Number of sources identified and funded under the
program.
a. Number of sources currently being evaluated.
b. Number of sources for which final evaluation reports
have been submitted.
c. Number of sources for which emission reductions have
been required.
Report status of urban air toxics assessment mitigation
activity accomplished.
A-17
A-18
A-19a
A-19b
A-19C
A-19d
Ql Only
By Region
01,2,3,4
By Region
Q4 Only
By Region
Q2, Q4
By Region
Q2,Q4
By Region
Q2,Q4
By Region
OAR-9
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SEWS CODE FREQUENCY
All States and major
independent local agencies
have identifiable programs
adequate to implement air
toxics regulations and to
carry out activities as
described in the Multi-Year
Development Plans (MYDPs)
consistent with the
National Air Toxics
Strategy and OAR Guidance
(continued) .
Report for nontransitory NESHAP sources:
u. Number of nontransitory NESHAP sources.
a. Number of NESHAP sources in violation, meeting
shedules, unknown, at end of quarter.
b. Number of inspections of flagged NESHAP sources,
against quarterly targets. (Data are lagged one
quarter.)
c. Status of NESHAP significant violators. (Status of
Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure A/E-24) :
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 60 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 90 days.
Report on status of asbestos demolitions and renovation
program, for States and EPA:
a. Number of notifications of demolition received.
b. Number of inspections completed.
c. Number of AOs taken.
d. Number of NOVs or NODs.
e. Number of civil referrals.
f . Number of violators with civil penalties addressed.
g. Number of contractors inspected.
h. Number of notification violations identified.
i. Number of substantative violations identified.
(Data are lagged one quarter. )
A/E-20
A/E-21
Ql,2,3,4
Ql,2,3,4
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-10
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Plannincf and Standards
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Maintain an appropriate
level of enf oroement by EPA
and State and local
agencies.
Report on the status of enforcement actions:
a. Number of State and EPA administrative orders
issued.
b. Number of State civil and criminal actions taken.
c. Number of EPA civil and criminal actions taken (to
be reported by OECM).
Report on the status of "remaining" significant
violators, that is, those other than VOC, TSP, SC>2, and
nontransitory NESHAP violators:
Status of remaining significant violators. (Status
of Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure VE-24):
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 120 days.
- Number addressed within 270 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
- Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.
A/E-22
A/E-23
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-11
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
MEASURE
SEMS CODE FREQUENCY
Maintain an appropriate
level of enforcement by EPA
and State and local
agencies (continued).
Review all major source
permits during the public
comment period, or, when
EPA is processing the
permit, to process the
permit within the required
time period.
Report on the status of Federal facility significant
violators.
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 120 days.
- Number addressed within 270 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
- Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.
Report EPA reviews of major sources permit packages, by
State or territory:
a. Number of major source permit packages for which
reviews (or permits, if Regional Office is
processing) are due by end of quarter.
b. Number of packages in a. reviewed on time.
A/E-24
A-25
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
01,2,3,4
by Region
OAR-12
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
FOR SPREADSHEET ITEMS RELATING TO OZONE/CO, FM10, AND SC>2
OAR will provide guidance and input data screens for use in reporting the spreadsheet items as derived from the Regional
Priorities Tracking System. Targets will be established for spreadsheet items during August 1989 and after consultation
between the Regions and Headquarters.
A-2 OZONE/CD SPREADSHEET
Universe: The total number of (a) deficient regulations, (b) missing regulations, and (c) other SIP deficiencies that
were listed in the letters to the State Air Directors in spring 1988 and were not corrected in FY 1989. The
remaining deficiencies in the universe, with some exceptions (for example, capture efficiency test methods
or delays caused by lengthy State legislative or administrative requirements), will become the targets.
Status Report on Updating Emissions Inventory: In Ql, confirm counties included in inventory update, including the
counties which have major sources within 25 miles of the MSA/CMSA. Set target dates for completion of point
source, area source and mobile source inventories. In Q2, Q3, Q4, update status on completion of the point,
area and mobile source portions of the inventory.
Draft Emission Control Requirements; State has submitted a draft determination of the percent reduction needed in the
base year inventory (for VOC, NC^, 00 as appropriate) for the area to demonstrate attainment.
Draft Measures Submitted: State has submitted draft measures (expected to be included in its control strategy) to
demonstrate attainment, including prescribed measures and state selected measures.
Draft Demonstration Plan Submitted: State has submitted the draft control strategy expected, to be adequate to provide
for attainment and maintenance. Plan must include the expected benefits (reductions) from the control
measures, projected growth in the nonattainment area, and demonstration that the strategy provides the
needed reductions.
OAR-13
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
A-3, A-4 STATUS OF VEHICLE DEFECTION PROGRAMS
Classifications of State/local Vehicle Inspection programs and which ones will be targeted for audits will be negotiated
at the beginning of the fiscal year. Reports in Quarters 2 and 4 will address the status of each State/Local Vehicle
Inspection program that is classified as anything except "Operating At An Acceptable Level." Reclassifications of
programs will be recommended in the reports as needed.
A/E-7, 13, 15, 20, 23, 24
Definition of Significant Violator
One of the objectives of the Office of Air and Radiation for FY 1990 is that resources be used to address significant
air violators and return them to compliance. This definition is designed to ensure that resources are used in the most
environmentally-beneficial manner. A violator is deemed a significant violator if it meets any one or more of the
following criteria:
*
o A source in violation of a NESHAP, other than a source violating asbestos demolition and renovation requirements.
(Because of the transitory nature of asbestos demolition/renovation activities, they are not easily susceptible to
tracking under the significant violator program. However, because of their environmental significance, they are
being tracked in a separate SPMS reporting requirement.) ;
o A source in violation of new source requirements, including NSPS, PSD, and Part D nonattainment permitting
requirements;
o A Class A source in violation of a SIP if the source is located so as to impact a nonattainment area and is in
violation for the pollutant for which the area is nonattainment;
o A source in violation of Federal consent decree or administrative order; or
o A Class A Federal facility violator.
The significant violator program is intended to identify the highest priority sources for the air compliance
program and to provide a special tracking system for resolving violations by these sources. The criteria listed above
are in no way intended to preclude EPA enforcement activity against violating sources which do not meet the criteria
(e.g., violating Class Al SIP sources in attainment areas) if the State has not taken, or is not taking appropriate
action, and if such actions will not detract from the significant violator program.
OAR-14
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SEM5 DEFINITIONS
A/E-7, 13, 15, 20, 21
Definition of a Minimally Acceptable Inspection (Level II Inspection)
A minimally-acceptable State or local compliance inspection is an on-site visit to the operating source to assess
compliance with at least applicable Federal air pollution control requirements. At a minimum, a compliance inspection
must be performed for all Federally-regulated air pollutants emitted by the source. Also, a source that is regulated
for visible emissions must be evaluated using an acceptable reference method. Where a source is Federally-regulated for
more than opacity, a compliance inspection involving only a visible emissions observation is not generally considered to
be a minimally-acceptable compliance inspection.
As part of the source compliance inspection, an inspector must record the process operating conditions and, if
appropriate, the control device conditions to determine if any significant change has occurred since the last
inspection, or any process or control operation outside normal or permitted conditions has occurred. It is expected
that minimally-acceptable compliance inspections would also include at least an operations log check of process and
control equipment including continuous emission monitoring systems logs. It should be noted that these requirements for
a minimally acceptable inspection do not require the direct measure of operating conditions by the inspector.
OAR-15
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
A-8, A-9 PM10 SPREADSHEET
Attainment Status of Area Determined: PM^g a^r quality data has been evaluated using Part 50, Appendix K to determine
whether the area is attaining the NAAQS.
SIP Development Plan Submitted; Areas that have been determined to be in violation of NAAQS have submitted SIP
development plans.
Emission Inventory Submitted (PM10): The inventory of emissions from sources jjrpacting Group I areas is sufficient
to develop a control strategy.
Control Strategy Demonstration Completed: Adequate control measures have been documented for areas to demonstrate
attainment and maintenance of the standard.
A-14 SULFUR OXIDES SIP REVISIONS
Report on Status of SO2 SIP Revisions to Address Regulatory Deficiencies: The regulatory deficiencies are limited to
the following types of SIP actions: (a) unfinished Part D SIPs, (b) emission limits responding to outstanding SIP
calls, (c) unfinished or revisions to Section 110 SIPs, and (d) outstanding revisions to stack height regulations,
negative declarations, and emission limits for individual sources to comply with stack height regulations as
revised July 8, 1985.
Draft Rules, Plan, or Declarations Submitted; A draft of the regulatory language or declarations and modeled
attainment demonstration has been received by the Regional office.
OAR-16
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SIMS DEFINITIONS
A-18 MYDP ADEQUACY
An adequate MYDP means milestones are included which provide for appropriate activities in all the six MYDP presumptive
component areas and activities are consistent with OAR guidance for FY 1990. MYDPs can, voider certain circumstances,
still be judged as being adequate even though they do not contain all presumptive components. Where variation from the
"presumptive" components would occur, MYDP adequacy (except as noted below) will be based on having acceptable
substitute activities as determined by a case-by-case understanding between the Regional Office and Headquarters. This
understanding regarding replacement activities can take into account several factors, including: consistency with the
six MYDP components, current status of the S/L program, existing commitments established within previously submitted
milestones, available funding and resources, potential for S/L activity to have an equivalent effect, anticipated air
toxics payoff of substitute activities, and the severity of the remaining problems. Note that this variation from
presumptive components may not relieve a S/L agency from the obligation to include milestones in their MYDP reflecting a
State or promoted initiative. Milestones obligating a S/L agency to complete such projects (including the submittal of
any required reports) must be included in the MYDP for it to be considered adequate.
A-18 MYDP COMPONENTS - these are the six components that are presumptively included in an adequate MYDP.
High Risk Urban Areas; Adequate urban workplans, where applicable, have been submitted and are being
implemented on an acceptable timetable and in coordination with ongoing SIP activities.
High Risk Point Sources; A reasonable number of new candidates are being identified to the Regional Office and
evaluated, and appropriate follow-up action is being taken for previously identified high risk point sources
(including promoted and State/local initiatives).
S/L Capabilities; An adequacy review of technical, legal, and resource capabilities relative to the air toxics problem
has been completed and needed improvements are being made. Adequate support to the national program is being
provided. '
NESHAP Delegation: Responsibility for implementation of any applicable NESHAP has been delegated and necessary
improvements in enforcement of current NESHAPs are being accomplished.
Program Effectiveness; An initial evaluation of current program effectiveness in accomplishing air toxics
objectives (including programs implementing current MYDP milestones) and a workplan for needed enhancement of the
present program has been completed.
SIP Integration; An indication appears in the MYDP of the significant activities to integrate air toxics concerns
into SIP planning procedures and control strategy development.
OAR-17
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SFMS DEFINITIONS
A-19 M¥DP IMPLEMENTATION
Adequate MYDP implementation means at least 90% of the milestones of an MYDP targeted for adequate implementation in FY
1990 are being or have been substantially implemented and iirplementation occurs in at least five of the six component
areas. Also, for an MYDP to be considered adequately implemented, any nationally funded high risk point source activity
(promoted and State/local initiatives) or national demonstration project must be implemented in accordance with the
applicable agreements and schedules, including the submittal of any reports. Finally, where a formal commitment to S/L
rule development exists, significant progress must have been accomplished.
A-19 URBftN AIR TOXICS ACTIVITY
Urban air toxics assessment or mitigation activity includes study area identification, inventorying/modeling or
monitoring assessment activity for multiple sources, mitigation plan development, activity to reduce air toxics
emissions from multiple sources, and mitigation results achieved.
A-19 AIR TOXICS REGULATIONS
Comprehensive air toxics regulations apply to either all or most air toxics source categories for multiple pollutants.
A/E-22 STATE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
State Administrative Actions should contain provisions that, at a minimum:
o Explicitly require recipient to take some corrective/remedial action, or refrain from certain behavior, to achieve
or maintain compliance;
o Explicitly are based on the issuing Agency's determination that a violation has occurred;
o Require specific corrective actions, or specify a desired result that may be accomplished however the recipient
chooses, and specify a timetable for completion;
o May impose requirements in addition to ones related directly to correction (e.g., specific monitoring, planning
or reporting requirements); and
o Contain requirements that are independently enforceable without having to prove original violation and subject
the person to adverse legal consequence for noncompliance.
OAR-18
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
A-25 NEW SOURCE REVIEW
EPA major source permits: PSD or Part D permits defined as major by the EPA rules. For PSD, this includes sources
equal to or greater than (1) 100 tons per year (tpy) if listed and (2) 250 tpy if not listed in definition of major
source. For Part D, this includes all sources equal to or greater than 100 TPY. For both PSD and Part D, this also
means modifications to existing major sources which have a significant net emissions increase.
Due By Date; For reviews of State or local processed permits, the end of the public comment period. Other due dates,
if agreed to by the Agency and EPA, can be used instead. When EPA is processing the permit, the due date is the date by
which the permit should be issued, as decided between OAQPS and the Regional Office; this time period should be within 1
year of receipt of the complete application unless some other time period has been agreed to.
OAR-19
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Radiation Programs
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Facilitate development of
comprehensive State radon
programs. Assess
activities, existing
capabilities, and needs for
technical assistance and
training for State
programs.
Implement and support
policy and program
development of the national
radon program.
Report for each State:
a. Number of State/EPA radon surveys completed, against
targets.
b. Number of State initiated surveys (including
schools) , against targets, and summaries of results.
c. Number of private sector surveys and summaries of
results.
d. Number of schools participating in the EPA National
School Survey.
e. Number of mitigation/diagnosis training courses
conducted by EPA, the State, or private sector,
against targets.
f . Number of House Evaluation Program (HEP) and State-
sponsored mitigation efforts, against targets.
Report for each Region:
a. Number of State grants, against targets, for which
Region serves as project officer and evaluates
State's use of Federal funds, including the amount
of such funds.
b. Number of States that applied to the State/EPA
survey program, against targets.
c. Number of Federal facilities to which technical
assistance has been provided in conjunction with the
Federal buildings study.
R-l
R-2
Ql,2,3,4
By State
Q1,Q3
By Region
OAR-20
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
Office of Radiation Programs
MEASURE
SEMS CODE FREQUENCY
Implement national
radionuclides NESHAPs.
Assist States in
implementing Low-Level
Radioactive Waste Policy
Act and Low-Level
Radioactive Waste
Standards.
Assure Federal, State and
local preparedness for
radiological emergencies.
Report for each State the number of sources regulated by
radionuclides NESHAPs.
Report for each Region:
a. Number of sources notified, against targets (total
number cited in State profile).
b. Number of site inspections conducted, against
targets.
c. Number of industrial facility requests reviewed:
— waiver requests,
— construction requests, and
— modification requests.
Report for each State:
a. Number of facilities subject to LLRWPA and LLRW
standards.
b. Whether the State has entered into a State compact.
Report the number of emergency response plans reviewed,
against targets.
R-3
R-4
R-5
R-6
Ql Only
By State
Q2,Q4
By Region
Q2,Q4
By State
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
OAR-21
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
R-4 RADIONUCUDE NESHAP5
Sources recfulated by Radionuclide NESHAPs; Regulations are in place for five source categories: Department of Energy
Facilities, Licensees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Non-DOE Federal Facilities, Elemental Phosphorous Plants,
Underground Uranium Mines, and Operating Uranium Mill Tailings Piles. Seven other sources categories are being
considered and may or may not be covered by regulations to be issued by August 31, 1989. They are: Uranium Fuel Cycle
Facilities, Coal Fired Boilers, High-level Nuclear Waste Facilities, Radon Emissions from DOE Facilities, Phosphogypsum
Stacks, Surface Uranium Mines, and Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings Piles.
R-5 RADIONUCUDE NESHAPs
Industry facility waiver requests: Pursuant to 40 CFR 61.11.
OAR-22
19/RQ
-------
OAR
RADON; # OF STATE/EPA SURVEYS COMPLETED
(TARGETS) (cum) (R-ll
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
6
2
5
8
6
5
4
6
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
0
National
50
0
OAR - 23
12/89
-------
OAR
RADON: # STATE INITIATED SURVEYS (INCL.
SCHOOLS) WITH SUMMARIES(TARGETS)cum(R-l)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
2
4
2
2
4
3
3
1
1
1
2
National
23
OAR - 24
12/89
-------
OAR
RADON: # MITIG/DIAGNOSE TRAINING COURSES
(EPA/STATE/OR PRIVATE)(TARGETS)cum (R-l)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
4
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
2
3
National
21
OAR - 25
12/89
-------
OAR
RADON: # OF HEP AND STATE-SPONSORED
MITIGATION EFFORTS (TARGETS) cum. (R-l)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
National
0
11
OAR - 26
12/89
-------
OAR
RADON: # STATE GRANTS FOR WHICH REG. IS
P.O. & EVALUATES AMT.& USE (TARG)(R-2)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
v
VI
VII
VIII
IX
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
6
7
5
5
4
5
3
National
0
46
OAR - 27
12/89
-------
OAR
_7 RADON; # OF STATES APPLYING FOR STATE/
EPA SURVEY PROGRAM (TARGET) (R-
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
National
0
OAR - 28
12/89
-------
OAR 12 RAD. NESHAPS: # SOURCES NOTIFIED (TOT. #
IN STATE PROFILE) BY REG.(TARGETS) fR-41
Region
Universe
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
HO
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6000
National
0
6000
OAR - 29
12/89
-------
OAR
13 RAD. NESHAPS; # SITE INSPECTIONS
CONDUCTED (TARGETS) cum
JR-4)
Region
Universe
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
National
OAR - 30
12/89
-------
OAR
25
REPORT # OF RAD. EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PLANS REVIEWED (TARGETS) CUItl. (R-6)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
3
3
2
2
0
0
1
3
2
1
4
6
2
4
1
1
2
National
14
26
OAR - 31
12/89
-------
OAR
45
OZONE/CO SIPs; # FINAL STATE SUBMITTALS
RECEIVED (sum of next #) (A-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
54
127
227
206
318
162
12
21
171
36
0
3
13
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
10
8
13
0
0
40
11
0
32
0
46
27
56
0
163
61
11
0
64
0
54
92
170
155
234
123
12
21
96
27/6*
National
1334
59
27
114
984/963
* There is a target discrepancy for this measure.
The 00/00 shows the headquarters and region target respectively.
OAR - 32
12/89
-------
OAR
46
OZONE/CO SIPs;
DEFICIENT REGS
FINAL SUBMITTALS FOR
(A-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
49
86
108
158
151
115
9
20
145
36
0
0
9
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
10
0
9
0
0
20
9
0
28
0
42
0
40
0
101
39
9
0
56
0
49
59
100
119
125
86
9
20
84
27/6*
National
877
18
76
287
678/657
* There is a target discrepancy for this measure.
The 00/00 shows the headquarters and region target respectively.
OAR - 33
12/89
-------
OAR
47
OZONE/CO SIPs: # FINAL SUBMITTALS FOR
MISSING REGS (A-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
4
41
13
0
28
7
0
0
14
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
4
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
27
4
0
12
0
0
0
4
0
4
33
10
0
14
0
0
0
6
0
National
107
14
51
67
OAR - 34
12/89
-------
OAR
48
OZONE/CO SIPs: # FINAL SUBMITTALS FOR
OTHER DEFICIENCIES (A-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
0
106
48
139
40
3
1
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
2
0
2
0
0
0
12
0
50
22
2
0
4
0
1
0
60
36
95
37
3
1
6
0
National
350
_2J_
90
239
OAR - 35
12/89
-------
OAR
67
# STATE/LOCAL VEHICLE INSPECT. PROGRAMS
IMPLEMENTED SINCE 10/1/89 CTARG) (A-3)
Region
Universe
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
3
2
5
7
6
4
1
4
3
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
National
40
OAR - 36
12/89
-------
OAR
68
# STATE/LOCAL VEHICLE INSPECT. PROGs.
AUDITED SINCE 10/1/89 (TARGETS) (A-4)
Region
Universe
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
3
2
5
7
6
4
1
4
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
5
6
5
4
1
4
3
5
National
0
38
OAR - 37
12/89
-------
OAR
81
GP I PM10 SIPs; CONTROL STRATEGY DEMO
COMPLETED (TARGETS) (A-81
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
2
0
1
0
7
1
0
14
16
17
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
4
3
0
National
58
12
OAR - 38
12/89
-------
OAR 83 GP I PM10 SIPs: ENTERS HOP REVIEW
(TARGETS!
(A-8)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
2
0
1
0
7
1
0
14
16
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
3
0
National
58
0
10
OAR - 39
12/89
-------
OAR
90
GP II & III PM10 AREAS WITH VIOLATIONS:
SIP DEVELOPMENT PLANS SUBMITTED (A-9)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
o
o
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
3
0
National
11
OAR - 40
12/89
-------
OAR
91
GP II & III PM10 SIPS: CONTROL STRATEGY
DEMO COMPLETED (A-9)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
• o
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
National
11
OAR - 41
12/89
-------
OAR
93
GP II & III PM10 SIPs;
REVIEW
SIPs ENTER HDO
rA-9)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
National
0
OAR - 42
12/89
-------
OAR 102 PM10 NETWORKS: # OF SITES REPORTING TO
NADB 120 DAYS AFTER OTR ENDS fA-12)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
23
25
25
24
59
36
16
16
40
20
20
17
20
18
44
30
16
12
35
15
20
17
20
18
44
31
16
12
35
15
20
17
20
18
44
32
16
12
35
15
20
17
20
18
44
33
16
12
35
15
National
284
227
228
229
230
OAR -
12/89
43
-------
OAR 103 PM10 NETWORKS: # OF REPORTING SITES
WITH AT LEAST 75% DATA CAPTURE (A-12)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
23
25
25
24
59
36
16
16
40
20
15
15
20
18
41
22
14
12
35
15
16
15
20
18
41
23
14
12
35
15
17
15
20
18
41
24
14
12
35
15
17
15
20
18
41
25
14
12
35
15
National
284
207
209
211
_212_
OAR - 44
12/89
-------
OAR 111
SO2: PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD
(against combined universe)
(A-14)
Region
Universe
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
5
5
20
5
58
7
6
4
9
36
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
0
1
1
0
0
0
National
155
OAR - 45
12/89
-------
OAR 113
S02: SIP ENTERS HDO REVIEW
(A-14)
Region
Universe
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
5
5
20
5
58
7
6
4
9
36
0
2
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
4
4
0
1
1
0
0
National
155
13
OAR - 46
12/89
-------
OAR 122
NUMBER OF ADEQUATE MYDPs
(A-181
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
6
3
8
16
8
5
4
6
14
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
3
1
6
1
2
0
3
7
3
0
4
3
10
2
5
3
7
11
5
3
4
5
12
3
National
75
15
34
58
OAR - 47
12/89
-------
OAR 124
# OF MYDPs WITH ADEQUATE
IMPLEMENTATION
(A-19a)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
6
3
8
16
8
5
4
6
14
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
2
2
5
2
2
1
3
1
6
2
National
75
0
26
OAR - 48
12/89
-------
OAR 143 # INSPECTS OF FLAGGED VOC SOURCES IN O3
N/A AREAS Q4 - 89 (cum) (lag 101 fA/E-7)
Region
Quarter 1*
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
135
311
291
552
972
289
79
29
430
14
National
3102
*Fourth Quarter FY 1989 data is reported in STARS in the First Quarter of 1990,
OAR - 49
12/89
-------
OAR 144 # INSPECTS OF FLAGGED VOC SOURCES IN O3
N/A AREAS 01 - FY90 (cum) flag 10)(A/E-7)
Region
Quarter 2*
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
8
60
60
74
203
29
16
2
94
0
40
130
120
148
338
79
32
10
186
3
90
190
180
297
541
152
66
15
280
8
National
546
1086
1819
*STARS data for first, second, and third quarters of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
OAR - 50
12/89
-------
OAR 145 # INSPECTS OF FLAGGED VOC SOURCES IN 03
N/A AREAS 04-90 (cum) flag 10) (A/E-7)
Region
Quarter 1*
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
164
264
314
495
1.150
289
110
48
593
15
National
3442
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported in STARS in the first quarter of FY 1991.
OAR - 51
12/89
-------
OAR 147 VOC SVs ADDRESSED; IN COMPLIANCE. ON
SCHEDULE OR ACTION TAKEN (cum)
(A/E-7)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
6
4
2
8
1
3
0
2
0
2
12
10
5
21
8
6
1
4
1
7
19
13
11
36
11
7
2
6
1
12
27
17
14
60
16
9
3
8
2
National
26
70
113
168
OAR - 52
12/89
-------
OAR 163 # INSP.OF FLAGGED TSP SOURCES IN GP. I &
II AREAS Q4 - 89 fcuml flag 10) (A/E-13)
Region
Quarter 1*
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
20
16
100
76
1.575
111
55
117
408
112
National
2590
*Fourth Quarter FY 1989 data is reported in STARS in the First Quarter of 1990,
OAR - 53
12/89
-------
OAR 164 # INSP.OF FLAGGED TSP SOURCES IN GP. I &
II AREAS 01 - FY90 (cum) (lag) (A/E-13)
Region
Quarter 2*
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
3
5
20
8
303
11
8
4
66
10
12
10
40
16
505
29
16
18
132
25
28
15
60
32
808
59
34
27
198
70
National
438
803
1331
*STARS data for the first, second, and third quarters of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
OAR - 54
12/89
-------
OAR 165 # INSP.OF FLAGGED TSP SOURCES IN GP. I &
II AREAS Q4 -90 (cum) flag 10) fA/E-13)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
51
20
99
56
1.717
111
57
81
419
105
National
2716
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported in STARS in the first quarter of FY 1991,
OAR - 55
12/89
-------
OAR 167 TSP SVs ADDRESSED; IN COMPLIANCE. ON
SCHEDULE OR ACTION TAKEN (cum) (A/E-13)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
1
3
13
0
1
1
0
10
2
1
3
3
22
0
1
2
1
16
3
1
5
4
31
0
2
3
2
22
National
11
30
51
73
OAR - 56
12/89
-------
OAR 183 # INSP. OF FLAGGED S02 SOURCES IN SO2
N/A AREAS Q4 -89 (cum)flag KM fA/E-151
Region
Quarter 1*
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
3
21
35
141
2
0
16
16
0
National
235
*Fourth quarter FY 1989 data is reported in STARS in the first quarter of FY 1990,
OAR - 57
12/89
-------
OAR 184 # INSP. OF FLAGGED SO2 SOURCES IN SO2
N/A AREAS FY -90 (cum) flag 1O) CA/E-15)
Region
Quarter 2*
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
4
3
38
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
8
6
64
0
0
4
3
0
0
1
12
12
103
0
0
6
7
0
National
48
86
141
*STARS data for the first, second, and third quarters of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
OAR - 58
12/89
-------
OAR 185 # INSP. OF FLAGGED SO2 SOURCES IN SO2
N/A AREAS Q4 -90 (cum) flag 1O1 fA/E-15)
Region
Quarter 1*
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
2
21
22
219
1
0
18
10
0
National
294
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported in STARS in the first quarter of FY 1991,
OAR - 59
12/89
-------
OAR 187 SO2 SVs ADDRESSED: IN COMPLIANCE. ON
SCHEDULE OR ACTION TAKEN (cum) fA/E-15)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
6
0
0
2
0
0
National
12
OAR - 60
12/89
-------
OAR 208 # INSP. OF FLAGGED NESHAP SOURCES
04 - 89 (cum) (lag
(A/E-20)
Region
Quarter 1*
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
40
103
72
125
231
120
13
4
107
16
National
831
*Fourth quarter FY 1989 data is reported in STARS in the first quarter of 1990,
OAR - 61
12/89
-------
OAR 209
# INSP. OF FLAGGED NESHAP SOURCES
FY - 90 (cum) (lag 1Q)
(A/E-20)
Region
Quarter 2*
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
20
15
19
57
12
3
0
14
0
5
40
30
38
82
31
6
0
28
3
20
60
45
76
131
63
12
0
42
7
National
140
263
456
*STARS data for the first, second and third quarter of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
OAR - 62
12/89
-------
OAR 210 # INSP. OF FLAGGED NESHAP SOURCES
04 - 90 (euro) flag 1O)
fA/E-20)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
40
81
93
125
280
120
17
4
89
16
National
865
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported in STARS in first quarter FY 1991.
OAR - 63
12/89
-------
OAR 212 NESHAP SVs ADDRESSED; IN COMPLIANCE. ON
SCHEDULE OR ACTION TAKEN (cum) fA/E-20)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
3
14
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
7
19
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
5
12
23
2
0
0
0
National
22
33
45
OAR - 64
12/89
-------
OAR 222 REMAINING SVs ADDRESSED: IN COMP. . ON
SCHEDULE OR ACTION TAKEN fcuitt^ fA/E-23)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
1
2
12
7
2
4
0
0
1
1
2
6
22
18
9
8
5
0
2
2
4
11
34
29
15
10
10
1
3
3
7
16
48
40
17
13
18
1
4
National
29
73
119
.167.
OAR - 65
12/89
-------
OAR 232 FED. FACILITIES SVs ADDRESSED: IN COMP..
ON SCHED. OR ACT. TAKEN (cum) (A/E-24)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
National
10
OAR - 66
12/89
-------
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM
As of January 1990, the following OAR projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE;
DUE DATE
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
3
5
8
20
26
28
32
73
83
84
87
88
90
97
102
103
105
107
108
109
110
111
112
114
NSPS: SOCMI DISTILLATION 2/28/86
NSPS: POLYMERS AND RESINS 5/25/90
NSPS: SOCMI AIR OXIDATION 2/28/86
NAAQS: SULFUR DIOXIDE 12/ 3/90
NESHAP: COKE OVENS 7/11/88
NESHAP: BENZENE 9/14/89
DISPOSAL OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE 1/31/92
NESHAP: ASBESTOS 9/ 6/88
FUEL VOLATILITY: PHASE II FRM 7/ 1/90
LIGHT DUTY TRUCK HYDROCARBON STANDARDS 11/15/91
NAAQS: LEAD 10/24/90
FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVE TESTING PROTOCOLS 8/15/89
EMISSIONS FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE (HW) FACILITIES 4/ 3/91
NESHAP: HAZARDOUS ORGANICS 8/21/88
NAAQS: OZONE 3/15/90
GROUND WATER PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR RADIATION 4/12/89
PSD INCREMENTS FOR PM10 11/23/90
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS: NSPS&S111D GUIDELINES 12/ 6/90
DIESEL FUEL QUALITY STANDARDS 7/31/90
NESHAP: RADIONUCLIDES 11/15/89
HD NOx AND PARTICULATES BANKING AND TRADING 7/31/90
NSPS: SMALL BOILERS 9/ 6/90
NSPS: SOCMI REACTOR PROCESSES I/ 1/99
RULEMAKING: CHROMIUM (COMFORT COOLING TOWERS) 10/30/89
OAR - 67
12/89
-------
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM
As of January 1990, the following OAR projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE;
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
HIGH-LEVEL AND TRANSURANIC RADIOACTIVE WASTE STDS.
NESHAP: ASBESTOS ACCELERATED RULE
OAR ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS
STRATO. OZONE PROTECT.: MONTREAL PROTOCOL & DOMEST
BENZENE LITIGATION
MUNICIPAL LANDFILLS
VISIBILITY REGULATIONS FOR THE GRAND CANYON
COLD TEMPERATURE CO STANDARDS REGULATIONS (NPRM)
IMPROVED EVAPORATIVE AND RUNNING LOSSES CONTROL:
EMISSION CONTROL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM REGULATIONS
NSPS: MEDICAL WASTE INCINERATORS
DUE DATE
1/30/92
8/13/90
3/30/90
8/15/91
3/ 9/90
10/28/91
ll/ 1/90
4/10/90
8/ 1/91
10/30/90
3/31/92
OAR - 68
12/89
-------
Office of Water
FY 1990 GOCMs
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Public Water System Supervision
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Ensure compliance with
existing drinking water
standards.
IDENFTTYING SNCS & PRIORITY VIOLATORS
a)
b)
c)
d)
Report the nunber of SNCs and priority violators occurring
during the specified time frames, for each of the following
groups. In additions, for each of group (a) and (c) [the
micro/turbidity/TIHHJ establish an annual target for the
number of violators and the net percent change in the number
of violators occurring from the fourth quarter of FY 1989 to
the fourth quarter of FY 1990.
micro/turbidity/rnil CHS SNCs
chem/rad CMS SNCs
nicro/turbiditv/rnn HTHCWS priority violators
chem/rad NTNCMS priority violators
(Note: date are lagged on quarter.)
DW/E-1
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1
OW-1
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF HATER
FY 1990
Public Water System Supervision
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
RESPITING NEW SNCS/PRIORTTY VIOLATORS & IDENTIFYING NEW
EXCEPTIONS
1. Report against the "new" microbiological, turbidity, and
THflf (monitoring) SNCs fc priority violators from 2 quarters
ago, the number which: returned to compliance; had a formal
enforcement action taken against them; or became exceptions
this quarter. Report separately for each of the following
two groups. (Note: Data are lagged one quarter.)
a) CMS SNCS
b) KTNCWS priority violators.
Report against the "hew1* chemical and radiological SNCs &
priority violators identified in the 2nd quarter of FY %89,
the number which: returned to oapliance; had a formal
enforcement action taken against them; or became exceptions
this quarter. Report separately for each of the following
two groups. (Note: Data are lagged one quarter.)
c) CHS SNCs
d) NIHCW5 priority violators.
DW/E-2
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1
OW-2
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Public Water System Supervision
MEASURE
SFMS CODE IHEQUENCY
Ensure compliance with
existing drinking water
standards.
RESOLVING EXCEPTIONS
1. Report the number and percent of exceptions identified
through the prior quarter which have since returned to
compliance, had a formal enforcement action taken against
then, or remain exceptions as of this quarterr. Report
separately for each of the following four groups;
a) miCTo/turbidity/TM! CHS exceptions
b) micro/turbiditv/TItM NTOCHS exceptions
c) chemical/radiological CMS exceptions
d) chemical/radiological NTNCH5 exceptions
(Note: Data are lagged one quarter.)
1. Report the total number of EPA administrative orders, the
total number of State administrative orders issued, the
total number of EPA 1431 emergency orders and the total
number of EPA ocnplaints with penalties. (Note: Data are
lagged one quarter.)
2. Report the number of civil actions referred to State
Attorneys General, the number of civil cases filed by the
Attorneys General, the number of criminal charges filed by
the Attorneys General, the number of civil cases concluded
by the Attorneys General, and the number of criminal cases
concluded by the Attorneys General. (OECM will report the
same data for EPA referrals.) (Note: Data are lagged one
quarter.)
DW/E-3
DW/E-4
DW/E-5
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OW-3
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WMER
FY 1990
Public Mater
ion Definitions
EM/E-1 IDEMTIFYTMr
fc HtlCR
This measure will report the runber of CWSs which meet the definition of SNC, and the number of NINCU5 which meet the
definition of priority violator for either a microbiological, a turbidity, an inorganic, an organic, or 3 radiological
requirement. Regions are to report four numbers: 1) micro/turbidity/Tnft CMS SNCS, 2) chemical/radiological CUB SNCs.
3) micro/turbidity/TMt MPTWS priority violators and 4) chemical/radiological MIMCHS priority violators. TOe
groups of micro/turbidlty/TDff violators will be compiled four times in support of the FY '90 SEMS — on 1/1/90,
4/1/90, 7/1/90, and 10/1/90. Die two groups of chemical/radiological violators will be compiled once, in the first
quarter of FY »90 (on 1/1/90).
Each State shall set a target for the percent change in the. number of microbiological/turbiditv/Tnn SNCs from the last
SFMS report of FY »89 (10/I/B9) to the last SFMS report of FY '90 f 10/1/90). The national ooal is for a JQ%
in the number of SNCs over the above 12 month period. The performance expectations may vary from State to State based
on
circumstances.
Regions are to negotiate each State's SNC target based upon the State's current
conpliance statistics and capabilities for violation reduction. While some States will negotiate targets which are
less than 10%, we also expect some States to be able to achieve more than a 10% reduction. The national goal should
not be interpreted as being the maximum reduction that a State should strive for if it is capable of a greater
reduction.
Karh stat-a shall also set a target for the percent change in the number of microbiQlogical/turbiditv/Tnti Priority
violators occurring from the last SRG report of FY »89 (10/1/89) to the last SttB report of JTY '9Q (10/1/90). T
currently is no national goal for this target. Regions should negotiate this target on a case bv case basis.
An at: is a conmunity water system which meets any of the following criteria:
violates the microbiological NCL for 4 or more months during any 12 consecutive month period; or
violates the turbidity MCL for 4 or more months during any 12 consecutive month period, or
is a "major" violator of the microbiological monitoring or reporting requirements for 12 consecutive months, or
OW-4
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WKTfX
FY 1990
Public Mater System Supervision Definitions
is a "major" violator of the turbidity monitoring or reporting requirements for 12 consecutive months, or
is a "major" violator Of the TOW monitoring or reporting requirements for 12 consecutive months, or
violates the microbiological MX, or is a "major" violator of the microbiological monitoring requirements for a
combined total of 12 consecutive months, or
violates the turbidity MX or is a "major" violator of the microbiological monitoring requirements for a combined
total of 12 consecutive months, or
exceeds the level for any regulated inorganic, organic (excluding TTHM) , or radiological contaminant, prescribed in
guidance above which exemptions may not be issued, or
exceeds the levels for TOW, prescribed in guidance above which exemptions may not be issued, for 2 or more annual
averages during the year, or
fails to monitor for, or report the results of, any of the currently regulated inorganic, organic (other than
Tim), or radiological contaminants since the Federal requirements for that contaminant became effective (June 24,
1977)
violates a requirement of a written, and bilaterally negotiated compliance schedule.
A Priority Violator is a nontransient noncommunitv water system (MPJCWS) which meets anv of the same eleven SMC
tha l ^Q CWSs.
Major Violator of a Monitoring or Reporting Requirement — monitoring or reporting violations where a system fails take
any samples for a particular contaminant during a compliance period, or where the system has failed to report the
results of the analyses to the primacy agent for a compliance period. (If the agent receives no monitoring report or
receives a report indicating that no monitoring was conducted, the M/R violation shall be classified as "major".
Level Above i*iich Exemptions Mav Mrfr P*i T**"^ ~ Analytical levels for all of the currently regulated chemical and
radiological contaminants (except TOW), above which exemptions may not be issued are contained in WSG-61 published in
1979. Inese levels will be effective until the levels are revised (revision is currently in process). Since no
exemption level currently exists for TOW we will use the MX until such a level is developed for TOW.
OW-5
12/89
-------
FICE OF
FY 1990
This measure will report the systems which met the definition of "new" SNC or priority violator for microbiological,
turbidity, and TOfi requirements two carters ago, which returned to compliance, had an appropriate enforcement action
taken against them, or became an exception for the first time this quarter, for chemical and radiological SNZs or
SMCs or priority violators identified in the
the following categories:
micro/turbidity/
1> OB micro/turbiditv/TOW SNCs. 2) CMS chemical/radiological SNCs. 3) mMCMS
and 4) MMCMS c.hjHpical/rf^ioflogic;;^i priority violators.
"Returned to Compliance" for SNCs or priority violators of a microbiological MX and/or H/R requirement, a turbidity
MCL and/or M/R requirement, or a TOW H/R requirement, is having no months of violation (either MZL or M/R), of the
same contaminant which caused the system to become a SNC or priority violator, during the six month period after the
system was identified as a SMC or priority violator.
"Returned to Compliance*1 for SNCs of priority violators of a chemical or radiological analytical level is conducting
analyses that demonstrates that the system no longer exceeds the level prescribed in guidance above which exemptions
may not be issued.
"Returned to Compliance*1 for SNCs or priority violators of a chemical tother than TOW) or radiological monitoring
requirement is conducting the required monitoring and determining that the system does not exceed the level prescribed
in guidance above which exemptions may not be issued.
An "appropriate enforcement action" for SNCs Qf priority Violators is any of the following:
(a) the issuance of a bilateral, written compliance agreement signed by both parties, which includes a compliance
schedule, (only appropriate States)
OW-6
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Public Mater System Supervision Definitions
(b) the issuance of a State or final Federal Administrative Order, Compliance Order.
(c) the referral of a civil judicial case to the State Attorney General, or DOJ.
(d) the filing of a criminal case in an appropriate State or U.S. District court.
A "first time exception* is a new SNC or priority violator which was not addressed timely and/or appropriately.
A "new SMC" is a system which has been identified for the first time as an SNC.
A "new priority violator" is a system which has been identified for the first time as a priority violator.
Tine I i ness for SNCs antj priority violators of microbiological MIL and/or M/R, turbidity MCL and/or M/R, or TIHM
requirements is eight months after the system became an SNC or priority violators. (T\ro months for the State to
determine, and become aware of, the system's SNC or priority violator status and six months in which to complete the
follow-up/enforcement action).
Timeliness for SNCs and priority violators of chemical (other than TOW monitoring) or radiological requirements is
fourteen months after the system became a SNC or priority violator. (Two months for the State to determine, and become
aware of, the system's SNC or priority violator status and twelve months in which to complete the follow-up/enforcement
action).
-
An exception is a system which was an SNJC or priority violator and was not addressed timely and/or appropriately.
This measure will track state and Regional follow-up actions on exceptions. We will tally the number of exceptions
remaining *f the close of the previous quarterly report and •nasure follow-UP activity Which occurred during tfte
current, quarterly report.
OW-7
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF warn
FY 1990
Public Mater System Supervision Definition?
DM/E-4 MMPHsn»nvE
This measure is intended to identify the level of effort of administrative enforcement activity occurring at the State
and Federal levels, me measure is to include actions taken against any system (regardless of whether it 'is classified
33 an-ac. priority violator, non-ac, or non-priority violator. Qriiv those state actions that are against violators
State ooerator certification rcmiramnt-.q)
Actions against violators of non-SOtt requirements
mr iv»
The information should include all the actions occurring during the quarter — it is cumulative. This measure will be
compiled all four quarters during FY »90. WO actions "in the works" should not be counted. These will likely be
completed in the subsequent three months and States and Regions will get "credit" for them in the following reporting
period.
•nie performance expectations for individual Regions for the number of proposed and final fQs should be roughly
equivalent to the actions predicted as being achievable in the FY '90 Enforcement Resources Model.
DM/E-5 JUDICIAL
Till s mfwaire is intendnrl to identify the level of effort of judicial enforcement activity occurring in the State.
(Federal Judicial activity will be retorted separately bv the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring), The
JS Eft infill ftrt1nns taken against any system regardless of whether it is classified as an SMC. priority
Violator.
Or nQfl-priQritY Violator. _ Qnlv those State actions that are against violators of
ed. Actions against violators of non-SCHA requirements (e.g. . violations of State
ocerator certification reoui rmnaiLs I should not be counted.
The informatii
be completed in the, subsequent three months and States and Regions will get "credit" for them in the g
reporting period.
Criminal charges filed by the fCs include criminal indictments and criminal informations. Civil cases are concluded
when a signed consent decree is filed with the State Court; a judge issues a decision; a case is dismissed by the State
Court; a case is withdrawn by the State Attorney General after it is filed in a State Court; or the State Attorney
declines to file the case.
OW-8
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Ground-Water Protection
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Promote risk reduction
efforts and prevent the
contamination of current or
potential drinking water
resources through wellhead
protection activities.
Track, against targets established by each Region, the number
of States which have submitted a wellhead protection (W»P)
program to EPA for review and determination if the program
meets the full or partial requirements mandated by statute, and
subsequent approval/disapproval.
GW-1
Q 1,2,3,4
OW-9
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Ground-Water Protection Definitions
This measure is designed to build on the initiatives* undertaken by the Regions in 1988 and 1989 with interested States
to promote States' development of either a wellhead protection (WHP) program or wellhead protection activities which
are significant components of a WHP program.
Expectation;
It is expected that each Region will increase the number of States with approved Wellhead Protection programs in 1990.
*Initiatives were activities resulting in movement toward development of a State or sub-State WHP program or wellhead
protection activities.
OW-10
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WAITER
FY 1990
Underground Injection Control
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Issue Underground Injection
Control (UIC) Permits
expeditiously.
Assure that injection wells
are inspected and maintain
mechanical integrity
Ensure that any potential
endangerment to USDWs is
identified.
Determine what portion of
the regulated universe has
been specifically reviewed
in any given year and found
to be in compliance with
the regulations.
Maintain a high level of
compliance through
enforcement activities.
Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of UIC Class I, II, III, and V well permit
determinations made by EPA and the number made by State and
Indian Tribe primacy programs. Provide the number of wells
affected by these determinations.
a. Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of wells that have mechanical integrity tests perfromed
by operators and verified by the EPA, State and Indian Tribe
primacy program Directors.
b. Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of wells inspected by EPA and by State and Indian Tribe
primacy programs.
Track, by Region, for State and Indian Tribe primacy programs
and for EPA, the number of Class I, II, III, IV and V wells
found in SNC.
Track, by Region, against quarterly targets for the number of
UIC Class I, II and III and permitted Class V wells or
facilities checked for compliance by EPA and by primacy States
and Indian Tribe primacy programs. (Report by well class.)
Track, by Region, State and Indian Tribe primacy programs and
for EPA, all wells that appear on the Exceptions List from the
date the violation becomes an exception through the date of
return to compliance, noting the date the formal enforcement
action was taken, if any.
DW-1
DW-2
DW/E-6
DW/E-7
DW/E-8
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OW-11
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FV 1990
Underground Injection Control
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Track the total number of EPA administrative orders, the total
number of State and Indian Tribe primacy programs equivalent
actions issued and the total number of §1431 emergency orders
issued by well class.
Track the number of civil actions referred to State Attorneys
General, the number of civil cases filed by the Attorneys
General the number of criminal charges filed by the Attorneys
General, the number of civil cases concluded by the Attorneys
General, and the number of criminal cases concluded by the
Attorney General. (OECM will report the same data for EPA
referrals).
DW/E-9
DW/E-10
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
CW-12
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF
FY 1990
Underground Injection Control Def initins
DW-1 PEfMLT DETEBKINATICMS
This measure provides an indication of how well Regions, States and Indian Tribes with primacy are addressing permit
requests so that all operations will meet the minimum technical and regulatory standards and USDWs will be protected
from contamination. Identify, for each Region, State and Indian Tribe with primacy, the total number of permit
determinations which include the approval or denial of UIC permit requests/actions such as: applications for permits,
major modifications to issued permits, revocation and reissuance of permits, or termination of permits for cause. A
complete permit determination includes a thorough technical evaluation of the request, public notification or review
before issuance, and a final decision document signed by the regulatory authority. States and Regions are to place
special emphasis on permitting Class V wells that pose a high contamination risk to USDWs or where environmental
controls would be beneficial.
Based on the FY 1990 budget proposal and prior performance by Regions and States it is expected that Regions, States
airi Indian Tribes with primacy will make 6,900 permit determinations in FY 1990.
EM- 2 INSPEmCMS AND MECHANICAL
Definition of Inspection - A complete inspection should include an assessment of: the well head, pressure and flow
meters, pipeline connections, and any other equipment associated with the injection system; an inspection is complete
only when a report has been filed with the regulatory authority. Based on the FY 1990 budget proposal and prior
performance by Regions and States it is expected that EPA, States and Indian Tribes with primacy will inspect 61,600
wells.
Definition of Mechanical Integrity Test
A complete KIT is composed of a test for significant leaks in the casing, tubing or packer and a test for significant
fluid migration into a USDW through vertical channels adjacent to the well bore. An MIT consists of a field test on a
well or an evaluation of a well's monitoring records (i.e. , annulus pressure, etc.) or cement records. At a minimm,
the mechanical integrity of a Class I, II, or III (solution mining of salt) well should be demonstrated at least once
every five years during the life of the well.
Based on the FY 1990 budget proposal and prior performance by Regions and States, it is expected that EPA, States and
Indian Tribes with primacy will verify that 21,900 wells have been tested for mechanical integrity.
CW-13
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Underround Inection Control Definitions
DW/E-6 DISCOVERY OF
PfTTflJT[Af.
Definition of gfty; — TJi^ terw "significant noncompliance" means: (a) any violations by the owner/operator of a Class I
or. a Class IV well, (b) the following violations by the owner or operator at a Class II, ill, or V well:' (1) any
unauthorized emplacement of fluids (where formal authorization is required); (2) well operation without mechanical
integrity which causes the movement of fluid outside authorized zone of injection if such movement may have the
potential for endangering a USDW; (3) well operation at an injection pressure that exceeds the permitted or authorized
injection pressure and causes the movement of fluid outside the authorized zone of injection if such movement may have
the potential for endangering an USCW; (4) the plugging and abandonment of an injection well in an unauthorized manner;
(5) any violation of a formal enforcement action, including an administrative or judicial order, consent agreement,
judgement or equivalent State action; (6) the knowing submission or use of false information in a permit application,
periodic report or special request for information about a well. NOTE: in the absence of information to the contrary
MIT failures and pressure exceedence are presumed to be SNCs.
This measure provides an indication of how many wells with SNC violations have been identified this year to date,
whether or not the wells have been returned to compliance.
DW/E-6 ENFORCEMENT AGA
Definition of an Enforcement action against anv Noncompliance; Any number of appropriate responses to violations:
Warning letter that specifies nature of violation, required responses and possible criminal/civil liabilities; Field
inspection; "show cause" meeting between violator and primacy agency; Request for new/additional information; Request
for permit application; Initiate permit modification, alternation or termination or impose or modify a compliance
schedule; Issue Administrative Order; Commence bond forfeiture or utilize other financial mechanisms to plug the well;
or Referral to State Aq/Department of Justice (DOJ) (Civil or Criminal). An enforcement action can be formal (See
DW/E-8) or informal, e.g., Telephone call (appropriately documented).
Definition of Timelv and Appropriate Enforcement Response to Significant NpncomPliance; The State or Region should
take one of the following actions within 90 days after a SNC is identified: (1) verify that the owner/operator has
returned to compliance; (2) place a owner/operator on an enforceable conpliance schedule and track to ensure future
conpliance; or (3) initiate a formal enforcement action against the owner/operator.
OW-14
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF
FY 1990
Underground Injection Control Definitions
EW/E-7 COMPLIANCE REVIEWS
this measure provides an indication of now many Class I, II and III wells and permitted Class V wells each Region,
State and Indian Tribe with primacy specifically reviews (including an inspection) in any given year for compliance
with UIC regulations. A compliance review strategy may differ from Class to Class but should include the examination
of: monitoring reports, completion reports of well workovers, mechanical integrity test reports, a well's ownership and
financial responsibility demonstration and all temporarily abandoned wells. The compliance review will replace the
file review reporting element for FY 1990. Note: the Indian Tribes with primacy programs will still conduct an
initial file review to assure that all existing Class II injection wells are sited, designed, constructed and operated
in a way that will assure prevention of endangerment to USDWs.
8 EXCEPTICMS LIST
This measure provides an indication of how well States are resolving incidents of significant noncompliance. This is
the name specific Exceptions List report which identifies those well owners and/or operators reported in significant
noncompliance (SNC) on EPA Form 7520-2B for two or more consecutive quarters without being addressed with a formal
enforcement action or returned to compliance. Any SNC reported on Form 7520-4 shall be reported until the SMC is
resolved. Once a SNC is reported as resolved, it need not appear in subsequent reports.
Definition of a Formal Enforcement Action; is any action which: (i) requires sane action to achieve compliance (ii)
specifies a time by time action is to be taken; (iii) contains consequences for noncompliance that are independently
enforceable without having to prove the underlying violation, and (iv) subjects the person to adverse legal
consequences for noncompliance until corrective action is taken or a well properly plugged. (Note: pipeline severance
meets this definition but a notice of violation tJiat does not include ...1 of the four elements does not. A State
ordered well shut-in is a formal enforcement action. A shut-in well, however, cannot be construed as in compliance
until it is corrected or properly abandoned. )
OW-15
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FT 1990
Underground Injection Control Definitions
DW/E-9 ADMINISTRATIVE
This measure provides an indication of how many and what . types of enforcement actions a Region or a State is taking
when violations are discovered. Report the number of proposed EPA AQs, equivalent state and Indian Tribe primacy
program actions, and the total number of $1431 emergency orders issued by well class (list EPA separately from State
and Indian Tribe primacy programs). Since many Class V wells present high contamination risks to USDWs, all primacy
agencies should place an increased emphasis on issuing AOs for this Class. When counting proposed AOs, only those
proposed orders that have been issued by the Regibn should be included. Draft information type orders are not included
in this measure. Individual Regional performance for the number of AOs expected to be roughly equivalent to the
benchmark targets derived in the FY 1989 Enforcement Workload Model.
DW/E-1Q REFERRAT-S
Federal referrals will be reported by the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring; state UIC referrals will be
reported by the Regions.
Definitions of Case Conclusions; A case is concluded when a signed consent decree is filed with the State court, the
case is dismissed by the State court; the case is withdrawn by the State Attorney General after it is filed in a State
court; or the State Attorney General declines to file the case.
OW-16
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF HATER
FY 1990
Marine and Estuarine Protection
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Prepare environmental
impact statements and rule
making packages for ocean
dumping site designation.
Achieve the 29 commitments
made in the 1987 Agreement
by 1991.
Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for:
- number of final environmental impact statements, and
- Number of sites designated.
1987
Track against targets the cumulative number of commitments
in the 1987 agreement that were completed.
WQ-1
CB-1
0,1,2,3,4
Q,2,4
OW-17
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Marine And Estuarine Protection Definitions
WO-1 OCEAN DISPOSAL PERMITS
If a) number of final environmental inoact statements (EISs) - It is expected that the Regions will prepare EISs for
dredged material disposal sites based on the priorities set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the
Region and the Corps of Engineers District Office, and will prepare EISs for municipal and industrial disposal sites
based on national priorities. The preparation of final EISs includes incorporating response to all comments received,
and making necessary changes to finalize the EIS, which may include updating any of the surveys or special interagency
activities, such as endangered species considerations.
Kbl number of ocean disposal si*"*>g designated — It is expected that the Regions will designate dredged material
disposal sites as set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) between the Region and the Corps of Engineers
District Office, and designate municipal and industrial sites based on national priorities. In the preparation of a
site designation document, if the EIS Record of Decision selects ocean dumping as preferred alternative, the site
designation activity includes promulgation of proposed rules and final rules. Also, it includes consultation with other
Federal and State agencies, preparation of Federal Register notices, hearings, and response to public comments.
OW-18
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Wetlands Protection
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Protect the most important
wetlands and other special
aquatic sites.
Manage an effective section
404 oonplianoe/enforcement
program.
Track progress against targets for the number of strategic
initiatives started.
Number of strategic initiatives completed.
Nunber of administrative compliance orders issued during the
quarter.
Number of administrative penalty complaints issued during the
quarter.
Number of civil cases referred to DOJ during the quarter.
Number of criminal cases referred to DQJ during the quarter.
Number of cases resolved during the quarter.
WQ-2
WQ/E-1
0,1,2,3,4
0,1,2,3,4
OW-19
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Wetlands Protection Definitions
WQ-2 PROTECTION OF IMPORTANT WETLANDS AND OTHER SPECIAL SITES
The "Strategic Initiatives" (SI) encompasses a fairly wide range of strategic activities undertaken
by a Region to improve protection of wetlands and/or other critical aquatic habitats on a,broad
(temporal/spatial) scale. An SI may be extensive involving increased EPA action on a broad
geographic scale in a major program activity area (e.g., increasing public outreach throughout a
State). Alternatively, it nay be intensive in being targeted to a more limited geographical area
(e.g., enforcement in that area). At a minimum, an SI must include problem analysis, identification
of goals for the target wetlands, evaluation"of options to achieve the goals, an action plan,
implementation, and an evaluation of results. As a guide, an SI should constitute a program
component that represents one-tenth or more of the Region's wetlands program attention. To
"initiate" a strategic initiative, the Regional Division Director should approve the action;
"complete" an initiative means to have implemented all components of the action plan, with only the
evaluation of results remaining to be done. Examples of strategic initiatives include: advance
identification, special area management planning, other comprehensive or multi-objective planning,
enforcement activity, jurisdiction delineation, public outreach, significant active participation in
a resource planning activity of another agency, joint activity with State, tribal or local
government, and wetland restoration and/or enhancement.
The performance expectation is that each Region will track existing strategic initiatives and will
initiate one new initiative during FY 1990. A more detailed four-page guideline on wetlands
"strategic initiatives" is available from the Office of Wetlands Protection.
OW-20
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATKK
FY 1990
Wetlands Protection Definitions
WQ/E-1 MANAGE AN EFFECTIVE SECTION 404 COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Section 309(a) administrative compliance orders issued by EPA. As a general rule, such orders
should require the violator not only to stop the illegal discharge, but also where feasible to take
affirmative action to remove the fill/or restore the site.
Section 309(g) administrative penalty complaints issued by EPA.
Civil section 404 cases that a Region refers, either independently or jointly with the Corps, to DOJ
for judicial action.
Criminal section 404 cases that a Region refers to DOJ for prosecution.
Number of cases resolved during the quarter under each of the following categories:
Number of cases resolved through voluntary compliance, which occurs where the Region has not
initiated any formal enforcement action against an illegal discharger, but instead achieves
compliance through informal processes.
Number of section 309(a) compliance orders where the violator has complied with the terms of the
order.
Number of section 309(g) administrative penalty actions in which the respondent has pain the penalty
to the Region or, in those situations where payment is due and not forthcoming, where a federal
district court has issued a final order requiring payment of the assess penalty.
Number of civil judicial referrals which have resulted in a federal district court entering a final
order in the case.
Number of criminal judicial referrals which have resulted in a federal district court entering a
final order in the case.
OW-21
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
F¥ 1990
Water Regulations and Standards
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Effectively implement the
WQS Program through
adoption of numeric
criteria in State water
quality standards.
Identify, against targets, the States that formally adopt (and
obtain an EPA approval action for) numeric criteria (both
aquatic life and human health criteria) for 307 (a) priority
pollutants to protect designated uses for all waters that need
such criteria. Report the cumulative number of aquatic life
criteria and human health criteria adopted in a water quality
standard in each State.
WQ-3
Second/
fourth
OW-22
12/89
-------
FY 1990
Water Regulations and Standards
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Identify waters where water
quality is known or is
suspected of being impaired
due to toxic pollutants or
toxicity.
Conduct water quality
assessments to identify
problems and determine
effectiveness of water
pollution control programs.
Identify by State, against quarterly targets, the number of
Regional approvals/dispprovals (following public notice) of
304(l)/303(d) lists and the number of Regional final
promulgations of 304(l)/303(d) lists.
Identify by Region, the number of waterbodies and the number of
stream miles, lake acres, estuary segments, coastal miles, and
Great lakes shore miles that States assess through (1)
monitoring or (2) evaluation, according to EPA guidance for
305(b) reporting. Identify the number that support, partially
support, or do not support designated uses. Identify the
number of waters that do not fully support designated uses due
to nonpoint sources of pollution and the numbers of those water
affected by each category of nonpoint source pollution.
WQ-4
Quarterly
Fourth
OW-23
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Regulation and Standards
MEASURE
SHIS CODE FREQUENCY
Ensure tijnely
implementation of approved
NFS Management Program
elemen
Assist Indian Tribes
treated as States to obtain
program grants under the
CWA.
Identify by State, against targets, the number of Statewide
programs and watershed programs and projects identified in
approved and initiated NFS Management Programs or portion of
those programs that (1) are completed in FY 90 and (2) have
been initiated but will not be completed until FY 91 or later.
Identify by Region and State, the number of Indian Tribes
qualified to be treated as a State and the number that submit
grant applicatinos. List Tribes that receive grants (by name)
and for what purposes (major activities and funding sources).
WQ-6
WQ-7
Second and
Fourth
Fourth
OW-24
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WQ-3 Implement WOS Program
This measure implements EPA's "Guidance for State Implementation of Water Quality Standards for CWA
Section 303(c)(2)(B)" issued December 12, 1988. It tracks the number of States that adopt numeric
criteria for 307(a) priority pollutants in a water quality standard.
By February 4, 1990, all States are expected to meet the requirement to adopt numeric criteria in
a water quality standard for section 307(a) priority pollutants for which EPA has developed section
304(a) criteria, as necessary to protect designated uses. Water quality standards should be adopted
for all such pollutants by stream segment based on information from candidate, preliminary, and final
304(1) lists; State Toxics Program Reviews; and other sources available at the time of the triennial
review. This requirement is met for a specific pollutant if a State documents that adoption of a
criterion for that pollutant is not necessary because the pollutant is not reasonably expected to
interfere with designated uses.
An exception to the requirement to adopt numeric criteria by February 4, 1990, is for those few
States who were so close to completing a triennial review at the time the Water Quality Act of 1987
was passed that it was unreasonable to expect the State to meet the requirement during that review.
In that case, the State has until the end of FY 1990 to meet the requirement. As indicated in the
guidance on implementing section 303(c)(2)(B), EPA will not accept a delay to the next triennial
review to comply with this requirement.
As data become available from updated 304(1) lists, water quality assessments, and other sources,
States are expected to revise State water quality standards accordingly. if a State fails to
complete a water quality standards review during the scheduled triennial review cycle, the universe
of waters and 307(a) priority pollutants for which numeric criteria should be adopted should be
reflected in the following year's SPMS commitment. This should occur only if the Region determines
that the State is at a point in the water quality standards review process where adoption of numeric
criteria for 307(a) priority pollutants will delay the current review process.
OW-25
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WQ-3 Implement WOS program fcont.)
The adoption of either numeric criteria for 307(a) priority pollutants (Statewide or site-specific)
or a narrative criterion with an approved procedure to translate the narrative into derived numeric
criteria in a water quality standard will meet this measure. The EPA approval action for the adopted
water quality standard (resulting in approval, partial approval, or disapproval) must also be
completed for this measure to be satisfied. Targets for the number of States that meet this measure
must be developed for the second and fourth quarters of FY 1990 and performance data for this measure
must be submitted for those quarters.
Numeric criteria must be adopted for the 307 (a) priority pollutants needed to protect designated uses
for all waterbodies identified in Monitoring OWAS measure (l)(a). If a State adopts all section
304(a) criteria for the 307(a) priority pollutants for all waters, this measure is satisfied.
The 307(a) priority pollutants for which numeric criteria are needed are identified from information
used to develop section 304(1) lists, including monitoring data, permit applications, 305(b) reports,
and data in the 16 categories of data that had to be reviewed when developing 304(1) lists. The
number of 307(a) priority pollutants for which EPA has developed section 304(a) criteria is
increasing each year, but now stands at 23 for aquatic life protection and 109 for protection of
human health.
The measure also requires that States report the cumulative number of aquatic life criteria and human
health criteria adopted for 307(a) priority pollutants in a water quality standard.
OW-26
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WO-4 304m/303fdl Lists and Promulgations
In FY 1989, this measure tracked the progress of States in preparing and submitting 304(1) lists and
Regional approvals/disapprovals of those lists. Statutory deadlines required that final 304(1) lists
be submitted in FY 1989. However, because of public participation requirements for disapprovals and
for approvals where States public participation is inadequate, some Regional approvals/disapprovals
may not be completed in FY 1989. Further, because EPA promulgations may occur up to one year
following disapproval of a 304(1) list, final promulgations may not be completed in FY 1989. This
measures tracks the number of Regional approvals/disapprovals and promulgations of 304(1) lists and
sources/amounts of pollutants that occur in FY 1990.
Quarterly targets should be established for both approvals/disapprovals and for the final
promulgations of 304(1) lists and sources/amount of pollutants. Performance data for this measure
must be submitted quarterly. In cases where a Region disapproves a 304(1) list; begins the
promulgation process; and the State then revises/updates the 304(1) so that it can be approved by
EPA, that 304(1) list is counted in the target for the Regional promulgations.
WQ-5 Water Quality Assessments
This measure tracks the number of waterbodies and the number of stream miles, lake acres,
estuary/segments, coastal miles and Great Lakes shore miles assessed by each State or Indian Tribe
treated as a State; the water quality status of those waters; and the impact of each category of
nonpoint sources of pollution on the waters. Water quality assessments are discussed in EPA's
"Guidance for the Preparation of the 1990 State Water Quality Assessment — 305(b) Reports."
OW-27
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WQ-5 Water Quality Assessments (cont.)
The assessment guidance established two categories of assessed waters (1) monitored - waters for
which current site-specific monitoring data exist and (2) evaluated - waters for which other types
of data, such as land use information from predictive models and ambient data older than five years,
exist. Use of these two categories establishes a level of confidence for water quality data.
A waterbody is defined as either a free flowing stream reach identified in EPA's River Reach File
or an entire or identifiable portion of an open water such as a large lake, estuary, or embayment.
When a River Reach number is not available, a water should be identified by name and
latitude/longitude from 7 1/2 minutes USGS topo maps. Geographically separated areas on large open
waters (e.g., two different cities on the Chesapeake Bay) should be counted as separate waters.
The number of waters assessed, the water quality status of those waters, and the impact of the
different categories of nonpoint pollution on those waters should be reported by Region in the fourth
quarter. The Office of Water compiles data from the Waterbody System, State 305(b) reports, and
205(j)(2)(C) updates in the fourth quarter.
WO-6 Nonpoint Sources
This measure tracks, by State, the number of statewide programs and watershed programs and projects
in approved NFS Management Programs or portions of those programs that: (1) are initiated and
completed in FY 1990 and (2) have been initiated but will not be completed until FY 1991 or later.
For the purpose of this measure, statewide programs include educational programs, sediment and
erosion control programs, and forest protection and preservation programs. Statewide programs also
include the enactment or adoption of legislation or regulations as well as the achievement of full
funding and staffing levels necessary for carrying out key nonpoint source control activities.
OW-28
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WQ-6 Nonpoint Sources (cont.)
This measure begins the process of shifting the nonpoint source management and control program from
the development stage in FY 1989 to implementation. Because the long-term focus of the nonpoint
source program is on watershed and site-specific clean-up projects, this measure will be modified
in FY 1991 to place highest priority on identifying and tracking major watershed and site-specific
nonpoint source pollution control programs and projects.
WO-7 Indian Tribe Program Grants
This measure assesses Agency progress in awarding CWA program grants to gualified Indian Tribes as
required by the WQA of 1987. Specifically, it tracks (by Region) the number of Indian Tribes
qualified to be treated as a State, the number of Tribes that submit grant applications, and the list
of Tribes that receive CWA program grants (include major activities and funding sources). Describe
Regional procedures for reviewing and ranking Indian Tribe grant proposals and for evaluating
performance.
OW-29
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Assess toxicity control
needs and reissue major
permits in a timely manner.
Assure NPOES permits are
fully in effect and
enforceable.
Effectively implement
approved local pretreatment
programs.
Reissuanoe of priority
municipal permits which
contain interim sludge
conditions.
Encourage permitting
efforts in near coastal
waters.
Track, against targets, the number of permits reissued to major
facilities during FY 90 (report NPDES States and non-NPDES
States separately).
Identify the number of final permits reissued and the number
modified during FY 90 that include water quality based limits
for toxics. Of these, report number that are Individual
Control Strategies (NPDES States, non-NPDES States; report
major and minors separately.)
Identify, by Region, the number of pending evidentiary hearing
requests and track, by Region, progress against quarterly
targets for the evidentiary hearing requests for major permits
pending at the beginning of FY 90 resolved by EPA and for the
number resolved by NPDES States.
Track, by Region, against quarterly targets, for approved local
pretreatment programs: 1) the number audited by EPA and the
number audited by approved pretreatment States; and 2) the
number inspected by EPA and the number inspected by States.
Track, against targets, total number of permits issued to
priority sludge facilities containing sludge conditions
necessary to meet the requirements of CHA section 405(d) (4).
Identify the number of permits reissued in near coastal waters
(report separately: NPDES States and non-NPDES States).
WQ-11
WQ-12
WQ-13
WQ-14
WQ-15
WQ-16
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1/2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OW-30
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Achieve and maintain high
levels of compliance in the
NPDES program.
Track, by Region, the number of major permittees that area: on
final effluent limits and not on final effluent limits (list
separately: municipal, industrial, Federal facilities; NPDES
States, non-NPDES States).
Track, by Region, the number and percentage of major permittees
in significant nonoompliance with: final effluent limits;
construction schedules; interim effluent limits; reporting
violations; pretreatment implementation reguirements (list
separtely; municipal, industrial, Federal facilities; NPDES
States, non-NPDES State).
Identify, by Region, the number of major permittees in
significant noncompliance on two or more consecutive QNCRs
without returning to compliance or being addressed by a formal
enforcement action (persistent violators). Of these numbers,
identify how many are in significant noncompliance for three
quarters and how many for four or more quarters. (Report
separately: municipal, industrial, Federal).
Report, by Region, the number of major permittees that are on
the previous exception list which have returned to copliance
during the quarter, the number not yet in compliance but
addressed by a formal enforcement action by the QNCR completion
data, and the number that were unresolved (not returned to
compliance during the quarter or addressed by a formal
enforcement action by the QNCR completion date). (Report
separately: municipal, industrial, Federal facilities).
WQ/E-4
Q 1,2,3,4
WQ/E-5
Q 1,2,3,4
WQ/E-6
Q 1,2,3,4
WD/E-7
Q 1,2,3,4
CW-31
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Achieve and maintain high
levels of compliance in the
NPDES program, (continued)
Effectively enforce the
pretreatment program.
Report, by Region, the total number of (a) EPA Administrative
Oonplianoe Orders and the total number of State equivalent
actions issued; of these report the number issued to POTVte for
not implementing pretreatement; (b) Class I and Class II
proposed administrative penalty orders issued by EPA for NPDES
violations and pretreatment violations; and (c) Administrative
penalty orders issued by States for NPDES violations and
pretreatment violations.
Report, by Region, the active State civil case docket, the
number of civil referrals sent to the State Attorneys General,
the number of civil cases filed, the number of civil cases
concluded, and the number of criminal referrals filed in State
courts
Identify, by State, the number of PGttWs that meet the criteria
for reportable noncompliance (RNC) and tract by State the
number of POIWs in that universe where action taken either
resolved or established an enforceable schedule to resolve RNC.
report separately by State for each action taken: technical
assistance, permit/program modification, or formal enforcement.
Report, by State, the compliance status (RNC, resolved pending,
resolved) of each POTW in the universe as of the end of the
year.
WQ/E-8
WD/E-9
WD/E-10
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OW-32
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Identify compliance
problems and guide
corrective action through
inspections.
Track, by Region, against targets, the number of major
permittees inspected and least once (combine EPA and State
inspections and report as one number).
WQ/E-12
Q 1,2,3,4
OW-33
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
WQ 11/12 Permit Reissuance; Toxic Permits
•Hie universe for measure WQ-11 is the total number of major permits with expiration dates before October 1, 1990,
according to PCS data on October 10, 1989 (i.e., the number of major permits that have or will expire by the end of FY
90). Measure NQ-11 is the total number of major permits issued with issuance dates (i.e., date signed by permit
authority) during FY 90. Status as of the close of each quarter will be taken from PCS on the 10th of the month
following the end of the quarter.
Measure WQ-12 is all permits (major and minor) that include water quality based limits on specific chemicals or whole
effluent toxicity and with issuance (modification) dates (i.e., date signed by EPA or State permit authority) during FY
90. Of those permits, the number that are ICSs is to be identified. This measure deals only with final permits;
however, because ICSs may also be draft permits with a schedule for final issuance, this number of ICSs will not include
all ICSs. WQ-12 is specifically designed to count water quality-based permits issued in FY 1990. ICSs are a subset of
this universe. Since "limit" is specifically designed to exclude permits which only include monitoring requirements,
such permits would not be counted as ICSs.
A water quality-based permit limit is a limit that has been developed to ensure a discharge does not violate State water
quality standards. Such limits are expressed as maximum daily and average monthly values in Part I of the NPDES permit.
They can be expressed as concentration values for individual chemicals and/or pollutant parameters such as effluent
toxicity. Effluent toxicity can also be expressed in toxic limits. Limits should be reflective of data available
through water quality-based assessments and should protect against impacts to aquatic life and human health.
As a matter of policy, EPA regards the new statutory requirements to control point sources as a component of the ongoing
national program for toxics control. In the national toxics control program, all known problems due to any pollutant
are to be controlled (using both new and existing statutory authorities) as soon as possible, giving the same priority
to these controls as for controls where only 307(a) pollutants are involved. Known toxicity problems include violations
of any applicable State numeric criteria or violations of any applicable State narrative water quality standard due to
any pollutant (including chlorine, anmonia, and whole effluent toxicity), based upon ambient or effluent analysis.
States and Regions will continue to issue all remaining permits, including those requiring the collection of new water
quality data where existing data are inadequate to assess WQ conditions.
OW-34
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
Performance Expectation: The goal of the State and EPA NPDES program is to have reissued major and minor permits in
effect on the date the prior permit expires. Permit applications are due and should be acted upon during the last six
months of a permit's term. Host States and Regions, should be able to reissue loot of their expiring major permits
except where unusual, complex and difficult issues prevent timely permit reissuanoe.
Regional quarterly reports for these measures will be reported to the Director of the Office of Water Enforcement and
Permits.
VO 13 Evidentiary Hearings
The term "evidentiary hearing" is meant to encompass not only EPA issued permit appeals pursuant to 40CFR 124 but also
any NPEES State issued permit appeals (whether adjudicatory or non-adjudicatory in nature). The meaning includes any
and all administrative appeals to permit conditions for major facilities, whether the appeals stay or do not stay permit
conditions. Evidentiary hearings for EPA issued permits are not considered to be pending if they are on appeal to the
Administrator as of the beginning of FY 1990.
An evidentiary hearing should be regarded as resolved once a final decision has been issued, a negotiated settlement has
been reached, or the appeal of an initial decision has been denied.
Performance Expectation: Evidentiary hearings should be resolved as expeditiously as possible. The target should
reflect resolution of all pending hearings. Although the measure is intended to reduce the backlog of pending hearings,
consideration should be given to new hearings requests made during FY90 that have priority over pending requests. Such
requests may be counted against commitments where they are priority cases (based on Regional/State evaluation).
WD 14 Pretreatment Audits and Inspections
A local pretreatment program audit is a detailed on-site review of an approved program to determine its adequacy. The
audit report identifies needed modifications to the approved local program and/or the POIW's NPDES permit to address any
problems. The audit includes a review of the substantive requirements of the program, including local limits, to
ensure protection against pass through and interference with treatment works and the methods of sludge disposal. The
OW-35
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement sand Permits Definitions
auditor reviews the procedures used by the POW to ensure effective implementation and reviews the quality of local
permits and determinations (such as implementation of the combined wastestream formula). In addition, the audit
includes, as one conponent, all the elements of a pretreatment compliance inspection (PCI).
In certain cases, non-pretreatment States will be allowed to conduct audits for EPA. If a non-pretreatroent State has
the experience, training, resources and capabilities to effectively conduct audits, these audits could be counted. A
determination of whether a non-pretreatment State could conduct the audit for EPA will be worked out between EPA HQ and
the Region during the commitment negotiation process on a case-by-case basis.
The pretreatment compliance inspection (PCI) assesses POIW compliance with its approved pretreatment program and its
NPDES permit requirements for implementation of that program. The checklist to be used in conducting a PCI assesses the
POIW's compliance monitoring and enforcement program, as well as the status of issuance of control mechanisms and
program modifications. A PCI must include a file review of a sample of industrial user files. Note that this measures
tracks "coverage" of approved pretreatment programs, not the number of audits or inspections conducted, which may be
greater than the number of programs since some programs may be inspected/audited more than once a year.
Performance Expectation: At a minimum, audits should be performed at least once during the term of the POIW's permit.
Although an audit includes all the elements of a Pd, as one component, the activity should not be counted as both an
audit and a PCI; it should be counted as an audit. In any given year, all POTWs that are not audited should have a PCI
as part of the routine NPDES inspection at that facility, i.e. audits plus inspections should equal 100 percent of
approved POTVte, except where mitigating circumstances prevent this (mitigating circumstances will be approved during
negotiation process). For purposes of reporting, both audits and pretreatment compliance inspections should be lagged
by one quarter, i.e. same as NPDES inspections. Also, where both an audit and an inspection are conducted for a POTW,
for purposes of coverage, only that audit will be counted.
WO-15: Sludoe Permitting
Priority sludge facilities are: 1) pretreatment POIWs; 2) POIWS that incinerate their sludge; and 3) any other POIWs
with known or suspected problems with their sludge quality or disposal practices. Pretreatment POflVte and POIWs that
incinerate sludge may be considered to be non-priority if such decision is supported by information showing no cause for
concern. The sludge conditions are to be included in permitr as the NPDES pern, -xpires and is reissued. The sludge
OW-36
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
conditions may be incorporated in another permit (such as a permit issued under the Clean Air Act, or a State permit
pursuant to an agreement between EPA and the State) and referenced to the NPDES permit.
WO-16; Near Coastal Waters Permitting
In accordance with EPA's near coastal waters initiative and the Marine Policy, Regions with coastal dischargers will
accelerate actions for reissuing permits to these facilities. A near coastal water is one with measurable salinity and
tidal influences. Permits should contain water quality based limits based on available wasteload allocations and should
be analyzed for persistent, bioconcentratable toxicants. EPA's Permit Writers Guide for Marine and Estuarine Waters
should be followed. This measure includes all expired or expiring permits (major and minors) reissued in FY 90 (not
modifications).
WO E-4/5 NPDES Ocppliance
A facility is considered to be on final effluent limits when the permittee has completed all necessary construction
(including all start-up or shakedown period specified in the permit or enforcement action) to achieve the ultimate
effluent limitation in the permit reflecting secondary treatment, BPT, BAT, or more stringent limitations, such as
State required limitations or water quality based limitations, or limitations established by a variance or a waiver. A
facility on a "short-term" schedule (one year or less) for corrections such as composite correction plans, where
compliance can be achieved through improved operation and maintenance (rather than construction) is considered to be on
final effluent limits. A facility is reported to be in significant nonccnplianoe with its final effluent limits when it
exceeds the criteria for unresolved significant noncompliance found in the combinations of violations:
— final effluent limit
— compliance schedule (short ternv'non-construction)
— final effluent limit and compliance schedule
— final effluent limit and reporting requirements
— final effluent limit, compliance schedule and reporting requirements
— compliance schedule and reporting requirements
A facility is reporter i to be in significant noncompliance with its reporting requirements when it exceeds the criteria
for unresolved significant noncompliance for reporting violations only.
OW-37
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FVT 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
A facility is reported to be in significant ronocnpliance for failure to comply with pretreatment implementation
requirements when it meets the criteria identified in the guidance defining significant nonoonpliance for pretreatment
implementation.
A facility is considered to be "not on final effluent limits" if the permittee does not meet the definition of a
"facility on final effluent limits" or when a permit, court order/consent order or an Administrative Order require
construction such as for a new plant, an addition to an existing plant or a tie-in to another facility. A facility is
reported to be in significant nonccraplianoe with its construction schedule when it exceeds the criteria for unresolved
significant noncompliance violations of:
— construction schedule
— construction schedule and interim effluent limits
— construction schedule and reporting requirements
— construction schedule, interim effluent limits and reporting requirements.
A facility is reported to be in SNC with its interim effluent limits when it exceeds the criteria for unresolved SNC
violations of:
— interim effluent limits
— interim effluent limits and reporting requirements
A facility is reported to be in SNC with its reporting requirements when it exceeds the criteria for unresolved SNC
violations of reporting requirements only,
Major P. L.92-500 permittees are tracked as part of the major municipals.
OW-38
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
\^Q E—6/7 Exception**
NOTE: For SIMS report the lumber only. As part of OWAS, report both the number and the name and the number of quarters
the facility has been in SNC.
Also, the name list must be submitted with the numbers; only the fact sheet, with justification, will be reported by the
15th day of the beginning of the next quarter. In regard to all major permittees listed in significant noncompliance on
the Quarterly Honcompliance Report (QNCR) for any quarter, Regions/NFDES States are expected to ensure that these
facilities have returned to compliance or have been addressed with a formal enforcement action by the permit authority
within the following quarter (generally within 60 days of the end of that quarter). In the rare circumstances where
formal enforcement action is not taken, the administering Agency is expected to have a written record that clearly
justifies why the alternative action (e.g.,enforcement action, permit modification in process, etc.) was more
appropriate. Where it is apparent that the State will not take appropriate formal enforcement action before the end of
the following quarter, the States should expect the Regions to do so. This translates for Exceptions List reporting as
follows:
Exception y«t? reporting involves tracking the compliance status of major permittees listed in significant
noncomplianoa on two or more consecutive QNCRs without being addressed with a formal enforcement action. Reporting
begins on January 1, 1990 based on permittees in SNC for the quarters ending June 30, and September 30, that have not
been addressed with a formal enforcement iction by November 30. Regions are also expected to complete and submit with
their Exception List a fact sheet which provides adequate justification for a facility on the Exception List. The fact
sheet should be submitted by the 15th day of the beginning of the next quarter. After a permittee has been reported as
returned to compliance or addressed by a formal enforcement action, it should be dropped from subsequent lists.
Reporting is to be based on the quarter reported in the QNCR (one quarter lag).
Returned to compliance (refer to the QNCR Guidance for a more detailed discussion of SNC and SNC resolution) for
Exception List facilities refers to compliance with the permit, order, or decree requirement for which the permittee was
placed on the Exception List (e.g., same outfall, same parameter). Compliance with the conditions of a formal
enforcement action taken in response to an Exception List violation counts as an enforcement action (rather than return
to compliance) unless the requirements of the action are completely fulfilled and the permittee achieves absolute
compliance with permit limitations. OW-39
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
Formal enforcement actions against non-federal permittees include any statutory remedy such as Federal Administrative
Order or State equivalent action, a judicial referral (sent to HQ/DOJ/SAG), or a court approved consent decree. A
section 309 (g) penalty administrative Order (AO) will not, by itself, count as a formal enforcement action since it only
assesses penalties for past violations and does not establish remedies for continuing nonconplianoe. Unless the
facility has returned to compliance, a 309 (a) compliance order should accompany the 309 (g) penalty order. Formal
enforcement actions against federal permittees include Federal Facility Compliance Agreements, documenting the dispute
and forwarding it to Headquarters for resolution, or granting them Presidential exemption.
WQ E-8 Administrative Orders
Headquarters will report EPA Administrative Ocnplianoe Orders (AQs) and State equivalent actions from PCS. All AOs must
be entered into PCS by the 2nd update of the new quarter to be counted in the report. (Include: POIW implementation
type pretreatnent AOs; IU AOs under pretreatnient section 2(a)). The number of proposed EPA administrative penalty
orders should be tracked by Class I and Class II. For State-issued orders, proposed or initial orders should be counted
where there is a two step process (i.e., proposed and final).
HP E-9 Referrals
The active case docket consists of all referrals currently at the State Attorney General and the number of referrals
filed in State Court. A case is concluded when a signed consent decree is filed with the State Court; the case is
dismissed by the State Court; the case is withdrawn by the State Attorney General after it is filed in a State Court; or
the State Attorney General declines to file the case. OBCM will report the same data for Federal referrals; State
referrals will be reported to the Regions.
OW-40
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
HP E-10 Reoortabl
Regions anchor States should apply reportable nonocnpliance (RNC) criteria to all approved POIW pretreatment programs at
least twice between July 1989 and June 1990. All reporting should be a sunmary of information that is listed and
updated on the QNCR on a quarterly basis.
Report PGnVte in RNC by EPA State (non-pretreattnent State) or pretreatment State. Refer to the Guidance for Reporting
and Evaluating POTW Nonocnplianoe with Pretreatment Requirements (Reportable Nonocnpliance Guidance) for a definition of
reportable nonocnpliance by pretreatment POTWs. One second quarter report should include the number of FOIVfe that met
RNC between July and DPOPB*W 1989. If a POTW was identified as RNC before July, 1989 and still meets the criteria, it
should be counted on the second quarter report. For the fourth quarter report include POlVte in RNC between January and
June 1990 and POTWs reported for the second quarter that were not resolved or resolved pending. Credit is given for any
of the three actions, listed in the measure, that resolves RNC (i.e. , results in resolved pending or resolved status) .
However, if technical assistance is the chosen approach, a schedule for compliance should be established. If the
schedule is 90 days or longer, it should be incorporated into an enforceable document. End of year compliance status
should be reported for all POnWs that were identified as RNC between July 1989 and June 1990. Report the total number
of POIWs that are considered reportable noncompliance (RNC) , resolved pending (RP) , or resolved (RE) as of the final
rt. PGOHs that are in compliance with enforceable administrative or judicial schedules to resolve RNC as of the
final report date should be counted as RP.
WQ E-ll Pretreatment Referrals
Hie active case docket consists of all referrals currently with the State Attorney General and the number of referrals
filed in State Courts. OECM will report the same data for Federal referrals; State referrals will be reported to the
Regions.
WD E-12 Inspections
As the inspections strategy states, all major facilities should receive the appropriate type of inspection each year by
either EPA or the State. As part of the NPDES inspection, verification of sludge management practices should be
conducted as appropriate. EPA and States collectively comnit to the number of major permittees inspected each year with
j
OW-41
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI), Compliance Sampling Inspection (CSI), Toxic Inspection (TOX), Biomonitoring
Inspection (BIO), Performance Audit Inspection (PAI), Diagnostic Inspection (DIAG), or Reconnaissance Inspection (RI).
Reconnaissance Inspections will only count toward the commitment when they are done on facilities that meet the
following criteria:
(1) The facility has not been in SNC for any of the four quarters prior to the inspection.
(2) The facility is not a primary industry as defined by 40 CTR, Part 122, Appendix A.
(3) Ihe facility is not a municipal facility with a pretreatment program.
Oanaitments for major permittee inspections should be quarterly targets and are to reflect the number of major
permittees inspected at least once. One universe of major permittees to be inspected is defined as those listed as
majors in PCS. Multiple inspections of one major permittee will count as only one major permittee inspected (however,
all multiple NPDES inspections will be included in the count for the measure that tracks the total number of all
inspections, see next paragraph).
Ihe measure for tracking total inspection activity will not have a commitment. CEE, CSI, TOX, BIO, PAI, RI, and DIAG of
major and minor permittees will be counted. Pretreatment inspections for lUs and POIWs will be counted only toward
pretreatment inspection commitments. Multiple inspections of one permittee will be counted as separate inspections;
Reconnaissance Inspections will be counted. It is expected that up to 10% of EPA resources will be set aside for
neutral inspections of minor facilities.
Hhen conducting inspections of POIWs with approved pretreatment programs, a pretreatment inspection component (PCX)
should be added, using the established Pd checklist. An NPDES inspection with a pretreatment component will be
counted toward the commitments for majors, and the Pd will count toward the cxnmitment for PDTW pretreatment
inspections. (This will be automatically calculated by 'PCS.) Regions are encouraged to continue CSI inspections of
POIWs where appropriate. Industrial user inspections done in conjunction with audits or PCIs or those done independent
of POIW inspections will be counted as IU inspections. Tracking of inspections will be done at Headquarters based on
retrievals from the Permit Compliance System (PCS) according to the following schedule:
OW-42
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
INSPECTIONS
July 1, 1989 through Sep. 30, 1989
July 1, 1989 through Dec. 31, 1989
July 1, 1989 through March 31, 1990
July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990
REIRIEVAL DATE
The First working day
after the second update in:
Jan. 1990
April 1990
July 1990
Oct. 1990
Inspections may not be entered into PCS until the inspection report with all necessary lab results has been conpleted
and the inspector's reviewer or supervisor has signed the conpleted 3560-3 form.
Note; SFMS only tracks the number of major permittees inspected. OWAS tracks the number of inspections.
OW-43
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Municipal Pollution Control
MEASURE
SFMS COM: FREQUENCY
State Revolving Fund
Management
Management of On-going
Construction Grants Program
Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for (1)
net outlays for combined construction grants and SRF, (2) net
outlays for construction grants, and (3) net outlays for State
Revolving Fund (SRF) program.
Track, by Region, progress, against quarterly Regional
Headquarters targets for the number of States, by name, which
have been awarded an SRF capitalization grants (cumulative by
quarter).
Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of Step 3, Step 2+3, Step 7, Marine CSO and PL 87-660
projects administratively completed.
WQ-8
WQ-9
WC>-10
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OW-44
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Municipal Pollution Control Definitions
Percents of cumulative net outlays for construction grants and State Revolving Fund SRF to program ocnroitment - The net
sum of payment made and recovered from PL 84-660 projects PL 92-500 206(a) reimbursable projects, PL 92-500 contract
authority projects, as well as projects funded with Talmadge/Nunn, FY 1977 supplemental, FY 1978 through FY 1990 budget
authority, Section 205(g) funds, Section 205(j) funds, Section 205(m) funds and all Title VI funds appropriated
expressly for SRF.
Performance Expectation - The cumulative Regional commitment will consist of a construction grants, a SRF, and an
overall component. The perfonnanoe expectation for the overall cumulative commitment will be + 5%; however, this
performance expectation range can be widened as long as construction grants outlays remain within ± 5% of ocmnitment and
SRF outlays are within a ± 10% range.
•f
WO-9 STATE REVOLVING FUND MAKflGEMBfT
Number of SRF Capitalization Grants Awarded (cumulative bv fiafiw) - This is a joint comdtanent by the Regions and
Headquarters. All the States are expected to be awarded an SRF capitalization grant by the end of FY 1990. Regions are
expected to base the proposed ooHmitraent on discussions with the States relative to the anticipated complexity of the
State's program and the need for review by Headquarters. Headquarters will review and concur in the awards involving
aqqressive leveraging or use of the fund to derive the State match. Where Headquarters review is needed. Headquarters
will negotiate final commitments jointly with the Regions. Headquarters will ocranit to a forty-five day review of an
application submitted by the Region.
OW-45
12/89
-------
OFTICE OF WATER
FY 1990
Municipal Pollution Control Definitions
WQ-10 MANAGEMENT OF Tig CM-OPING OONSTKUCTION GRANTS PROGRAM
Number of Step 3. Step 2+3. Step 7. Marine CSO. and PL 84 84-660 projects administratively completed - A project is
considered administratively complete when a final audit is requested, or for projects that cannot be sent to OIG because
of related on-going projects, when all of the administrative completion requirements have been satisfied.
Performance Expectation!
The goal will be to begin FY 1991 with no backlogged projects.
An acceptable commitment would be the number of projects that must be completed in FY 1990 in order to enter FY 1991
with no backlogged projects minus those projects that the Region and Headquarters mutually agree are not able to be
completed during FY 1990.
A "backlogged project" is defined as:
o A Step 3, Step 2+3, or PL 84-660 project awarded before 12/29/81 which has been physically cxmplete for more than 12
months, but has not yet been administratively completed.
o A Step 3 or Step 2+3, Step 7, Marine CSO project awarded after 12/29/81 which has initiated operations for more than
18 months, but has not yet been administratively completed.
CW-46
12/89
-------
ow
#COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS (CWSl
INVENTORY
(DW/E-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.882
4,757
5.595
10.935
8.378
8.838
4, 111
3.048
5,173
4.942
58,659
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OW-47
12/89
-------
ow
#NONTRANSIENT NONCOMMUNITY WATER
SYSTEMS (NTNCWS): INVENTORY
row/E-i)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.809
2.468
3.370
4.338
7.723
1.552
1,252
745
1.513
1.166
25,936
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OW-48
12/89
-------
ow
NET % CHANGE IN CWS IN SNC FOR CHEM/RAD
(FROM 04.89) (DW/E-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
10
5
10
10
10
8
5
10
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OW-49
12/89
-------
ow
8
NET % CHANGE IN CWS IN SNC FOR M/T/TTHM
(LAG lOl rPW/E-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
10
10
10
10
10
8
16
10
14
111
OW-50
12/89
-------
ow
62
EPA D.I. UIC CLASS I. II. III. V WELL
PERMITS DETERMIN. -NEW AND EXISTING (DW
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I 1
II
III
IV
y
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
0
0
12
1
30
46
20
1
9
0
0
119
0
26
2
60
93
40
1
15
3
0
240
0
39
6
90
140
60
1
39
7
0
382
0
52
8
125
187
81
1
50
10
1
515
OW-51
12/89
-------
ow
63
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.Ill & V WELL
PERMIT DETERMIN. -NEW&EXIS. (LAG 10WDW-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
70
41
27
167
592
4.114
410
189
858
71
6539
27
13
3
61
55
698
123
37
240
12
1269
54
26
6
133
113
1.374
244
73
479
24
2526
81
41
11
231
174
2.061
363
114
718
45
3839
OW-52
12/89
-------
ow
64
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.III.V WELL PERMIT
DETERMIN.-NEW&EXIS.;Q4 90 (LAG 1Q)(DW-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
110
54
16
351
240
2.780
487
153
962
75
5228
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OW-53
12/89
-------
ow
65
EPA D.I. UIC WELLS TESTED FOR MECHANICAL
INTEGRITY (DW-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
95147
0
80
175
150
120
45
0
260
0
0
830
0
130
250
264
180
90
0
260
0
0
1174
0
230
350
566
365
135
0
350
1
0
1997
0
320
480
755
590
180
0
494
4
3
2826
OW-54
12/89
-------
ow
67
PRIMACY UIC WELLS TESTED FOR MECHANICAL
INTEGRITY: Q4 90 (LAG 1Q) (DW-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
0
0
40
233
926
15.997
3.125
1.167
4.504
40
26.032
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OW-55
12/89
-------
ow
68
EPA D. I. UIC WELLS INSPECTED
(DW-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
95147
0
320
525
420
235
533
25
320
0
0
2378
0
544
850
735
445
1.066
50
320
150
0
4160
0
876
1,550
1,575
910
1.599
75
625
700
25
7935
0
1.208
2.200
2.100
1,370
2,123
100
1.000
865
30
10.996
OW-56
12/89
-------
ow
69
PRIMACY QIC WELLS INSPECTED
(LAG 1O)
(DW-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
375
52
371
1.265
5.181
35,348
5.160
6.175
6,192
263
60,382
112
13
103
415
1,696
8.756
1,220
1,407
1.308
65
26.875
224
26
174
661
3.036
17.112
2.400
2,798
2.616
121
29.168
337
39
282
917
4.284
26,564
3.822
4.741
3,924
200
45.110
CV/-57
12/89
-------
ow
70
PRIMACY UIC WELLS INSPECTED; Q4 90
(LAG 10)
(DW-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
450
52
400
1.213
5.631
35.828
5.300
6.235
5.607
322
61,038
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OW-58
12/89
-------
ow
74
EPA D. I. UIC CLASS I.II.III.IV & V WELL
COMPLIANCE REVIEW (DW/E-7)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
95147
0
100
400
150
133
225
0
35
0
0
1043
0
364
800
264
267
450
0
70
0
0
2215
0
515
1,400
566
401
675
0
110
0
0
3667
0
750
2,000
755
535
900
0
150
0
3
5093
OW-59
12/89
-------
r
ow
75
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.III.IV & V WELL
COMPLIANCE REVIEW (LAG 1O1 (DW/E-7)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
30
132
1.554
791
900
330
201
0
3950
24
0
90
278
3.002
1,610
1.900
639
726
0
8269
36
0
120
409
3.951
2,619
2,900
966
1,251
0
12.252
OW-60
12/89
-------
ow
76
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.Ill,IV & V WELL
COMPLIANCE REVIEW: Q4 90(LAG 1Q)(DW/E-7)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203.139
47
0
150
551
5.029
3,702
3.900
1.314
1,772
0
16,465
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OW-61
12/89
-------
ow
90
STATES W/ WELLHEAD PROTECT. PROGRAM SUB-
MITTALS IN FY 89; APPROVED IN FY90TGW-11
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
6
4
1
1
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
12
OW-62
12/89
-------
ow
91
STATES WITH WHP PROGRAM SUBMITTALS IN
FY89: REVISED/RESUBMITTED IN FY90(GW-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
5
2
2
1
2
2
0
2
1
1
0
13
OW-63
12/89
-------
ow
92
STATES WITH WHP PROGRAM SUBMITTALS
IN FY 90 fGW-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
4
CW-64
12/89
-------
ow
98
OCEAN DUMPING SITE DESIGNATION:
FINAL EIS
(WQ-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
4
2
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
8
2
2
1
1
0
3
0
0
0
3
12
OW-65
12/89
-------
ow
99
OCEAN DUMPING SITE DESIGNATION:
FINAL ACTIONS
(WO-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
4
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
6
0
2
1
1
0
3
0
0
1
4
12
OW-66
12/89
-------
ow
101
CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM: COMMITMENTS IN
1987 AGREEMENT COMPLETED (R3-CUM.)fCB-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
OW-67
12/89
-------
ow
103
WETLANDS STRATEGIC INITIATIVES STARTED
(FY 90) fWQ-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
v
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
8
0
2
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
9
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
13
OW-68
12/89
-------
ow
112
#STATES ADOPTING APPROVED AQUATIC LIFE
NUM.CRIT. (STATE NM & # IN COMMS.)(WQ-3)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
3
2
2
4
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
5
7
6
2
3
5
4
2
40
OW-69
12/89
-------
ow
113
#STATES ADOPTING APPROVED HUMAN HEALTH
NUM.GRIT. (STATE NM & # IN COMMS.)(WO-3)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
4
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
5
7
5
2
4
6
4
2
43
CW-70
12/89
-------
ow
116
#STATES W/FINAL REGIONAL ACTION ON
3.304(1) LISTfST NM & # IN COMMS.HWQ-4)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I 1
II
III
IV
\7
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X i
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
5
6
3
6
8
6
5
4
6
0
2
46
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
OW-71
12/89
-------
ow
118
#STATEWIDE NFS PROGRAMS INIT'D & CMPLT'D
IN FY90 (STATE NM & # IN COMMS.) (WQ-61
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
)u _
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
13
CW-72
12/89
-------
ow
121
^WATERSHED NFS PROGRAMS INIT'D BUT NOT
CMPLT'D FY90 (ST NM & # IN COMMS.HWO-6)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
4
5
2
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
4
6
3
8
20
2
3
50
OW-75
12/89
-------
ow
128
CUM. NET OUTLAYS FOR CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
AND STATE REVOLVING FUNDS (SRF) fWO-8)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
555
740
732
643
1.045
301
305
161
649
136
5,267
1.033
1.995
1,389
1.344
2,099
622
585
276
1,148
308
10,799
1,494
3,271
2.175
2.209
3,177
1,016
899
448
1,642
470
16,801
2.035
4,595
2,933
3.089
4.351
1.427
1,280
683
2,202
677
23,272
OW-76
12/89
-------
ow
129
CUMULATIVE NET OUTLAYS FOR CONSTRUCTION
GRANTS (WQ-8)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
543
661
663
499
988
169
289
138
627
136
4713
921
1.441
1.237
1,007
1.929
328
547
216
1.035
295
8956
1.270
2.267
1.856
1,530
2.772
514
810
347
1,391
415
13.172
1.700
3,143
2.389
2.060
3,651
733
1,055
540
1,780
575
17.626
CW-77
12/89
-------
ow
130
CUMULATIVE NET OUTLAYS FOR SRF PROGRAM
(WQ-8)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
79
69
144
57
132
16
23
22
0
554
112
554
152
337
170
294
38
60
113
13
1843
224
1.004
319
679
405
501
89
101
251
55
3628
335
1,452
544
1.029
700
694
225
143
422
102
5646
OW-78
12/89
-------
ow
131
CUMULATIVE# OF STATES AWARDED SRF GRANTS
(STATE ABBREVIATIONS IN COMMENTS) (WO-9)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
5
5
1
0
3
3
2
3
3
1
0
21
5
2
3
7
5
4
4
5
1
0
36
6
3
6
8
6
5
4
5
4
4
51
CW-79
12/89
-------
ow
132
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS PROJECTS ADM. COMPL.
(STEPS 3.2+3.7.MAR.CSO.PL87-660) (WQ-10)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
80
109
165
153
226
108
85
70
72
24
1092
10
22
24
25
47
18
14
12
5
3
180
29
49
42
52
80
32
30
26
16
4
360
50
75
88
84
117
50
46
38
29
10
587
71
107
113
123
157
70
68
56
49/40 *
18
832
* HEADQUARTERS AND REGION HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
OW-80
12/89
-------
ow
133
NPDES PERMITS REISSUED TO MAJOR FACILS.-
EPA (NON-NPDES STATES) (WQ-11)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
127
23
0
97
0
232
0
13
17
60
569
4
0
0
15
0
10
0
1
0
5
35
15
0
0
30
0
35
0
3
0
17
100
27
5
0
40
0
98
0
5
4
41
220
81
15
0
73
0
232/151*
0
9
11
52
473
* HEADQUARTERS AND THE REGION HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
OW-81
12/89
-------
ow
134 NPDES PERMITS REISSUED TO MAJOR
NPDES STATES
FACILS.-
fWO-11)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
87
237
330
409
462
35
101
61
135
75
1932
1
18
22
35
53
6
20
10
5
19
199
7
36
65
69
139
9
34
20
15
32
433
23
80
130
128
266
13
59
30
40
45
810
1 69
158
252
409/237*
455
33
95
55
115
75/54*
1716
* HEADQUARTERS AND THE REGION HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
OW-82
12/89
-------
ow
145
PENDING EVIDENTIARY HEARING REQUESTS FOR
MAJOR PERMITS RESOLVED BY EPA (WQ-13)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
7
2
0
9
0
10
1
3
13
6
51
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
1
7
2
2
0
2
0
5
1
3
7
1
23
OW-83
12/89
-------
ow
146
PENDING EVIDENTIARY HEARING REQUESTS FOR
MAJOR PERMITS RESOLVED BY STATES (WQ-13)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
7
46
44
27
20
1
1
5
0
0
151
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
6
0
1
6
1
0
0
0
0
17
3
9
0
3
15
1
0
2
0
0
33
10
12
10
10
20
1
3
5
0
0
71
OW-84
12/89
-------
ow
147
AUDITS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
BY EPA (WQ-14)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
64
57
88
33
90
96
16
39
0
15
498
2
3
2
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
12
4
8
7
2
5
7
2
3
0
2
40
7
13
10
5
8
10
4
6
1
2
66
13
20
17
11
14
20
8
9
6
3
121
OW-85
12/89
-------
ow
148
AUDITS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
BY PRETREATMENT STATES (WQ-14)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
13
22
45
361
237
28
63
13
0
28
810
0
6
5
12
7
1
1
0
1
0
33
1
10
9
34
15
2
5
1
3
2
82
1
16
14
50
20
4
14
3
6
9
137
3
22
21
101
50
6
23
5
17
16
264
CW-86
12/89
-------
ow
149
INSPECTIONS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT
PROGRAMS BY EPA (WO-14)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
9
3
2
11
0
0
4
0
37
18
10
22
9
4
22
2
6
4
4
101
32
15
36
15
8
44
4
15
4
7
180
54
22
70
22
12
77/73*
6
32
23
12
336
* HEADQUARTERS AND THE REGION HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
CW-87
12/89
-------
ow
150
INSPECTIONS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT
PROGRAMS BY PRETREATMENT STATES (WQ-14)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
28
50
3
3
1
14
1
106
5
7
6
84
90
6
10
3
34
3
248
8
12
12
132
150
12
20
5
56
7
414
11
16
18
260
251
21
42
8
75
10
712
OW-88
12/89
-------
ow
151
PERMITS ISSUED TO PRIORITY SLUDGE FACILS
W/CONDITIONS MEETING S.405(d)(4) (WO-15)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
36
120
30
85
47
59
243
16
0
25
661
6
0
3
16
11
1
8
0
0
9
54
15
0
8
33
23
6
13
5
0
16
119
25
1
16
45
35
10
18
10
0
16
176
36
27
27
71
47
53
36
16
0
25
338
OW-89
12/89
-------
ow
156
#NPDES PERMITEES INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE
(WQ/E-12)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
592
793
774
1523
1164
1013
357
291
358
300
7165
115
120
148
280
250
126
70
. 55
75
70
1309
270
290
296
640
500
252
110
110
150
108
2726
420
500
444
1.020
750
505
200
165
250
191
4445
592
793
739
1.523
1,100
1.013/903*
339
291
358
300
7048
* HEADQUARTERS AND THE REGION HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
OW-90
12/89
-------
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM
As of January 1990, the following OW projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE;
DUE DATE
OW 9 38 MCLS IN 24 MONTHS 1/15/91
OW 42 EFFLUENT GUIDELINES: OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS 3/26/90
OW 59 GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 12/ 9/88
OW 65 REVISIONS TO NPDES REGULATIONS: STORM WATER DISCHARGES8/ 3/90
OW 73 REVISIONS TO OCEAN DUMPING DREDGED MATERIAL REG 9/30/91
OW 74 NPDWR: RADIONUCLIDES (REVISION) 6/30/92
OW 92 GENERAL PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS (DSS FOLLOW-UP) 1/19/90
OW 95 PLANS TO REVIEW AND REVISE EFFLUENT GUIDELINES: 12/ 8/89
OW 99 EFFLUENT GUIDELINES - PESTICIDE MANUFACTURING 4/30/92
OW 101 CONGRESS REPORT: 403(C) OCEAN DISCHARGE CRITERIA 1/18/90
OW 102 REVISION TO NPDES REGS: S301(H) MARINE WAIVERS 9/14/90
OW 103 LEAD AND COPPER IN DRINKING WATER 11/30/90
OW 104 SEWAGE SLUDGE USE AND DISPOSAL 10/ 8/91
OW-91
12/89
-------
Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
FY 1990GOCMs
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Superfund
MEASURE
SFM5 OODE FREQUENCY
Identify and assess uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites in a
timely manner.
Commence action at hazardous
waste sites to remove toxics or
investigate cleanup strategies.
Implement an integrated
Superfund effort that focuses
both programs toward selection
of remedy following the
completion of the RI/FS stage.
Implement a cost-effective
remedial construction program.
Number of sites with Completed Site Inspections
(SI)._/ Year to Date.
SI Candidates Requiring Further Action.
Reporting measure only.^/ Program to Date.
Number of NPL sites where a Removal action or RI/FS has
started. Report against combined target.J Year to Date.
Percent of NPL Sites Addressed. Reporting measure
only._/ Program to Date.
Number of Remedies selected at NPL sites. Report against
combined target._/ Year to Date.
Number of NPL sites where Remedial Design activity
has been Started. Report against a combined target.^/
Year to Date.
Number of Remedial Action activities Started.
Report against combined target. _/ Year to Date.
Number of sites where all Remedial/Removal Implementation
has been completed. Report against combined target._/
Year to Date.
* 'Hi is tTKMsure requires Regional targets.
/ IX? I i nit ion at crxi of program measures
S/F-1*
S/F-la
S/C-2*
S/C-2a
S/C-3*
S/C-4*
S/C-5*
S/C-6*
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 1
12/89
-------
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
FY 1990
Superfund Definitions
S/C-1 Number of Sites with Completed Site Inspection (SI) - Tnis measure includes only .Screening Si's . A SI
is ccupleted when: 1) a Screening Inspection Report has been received by the Region from a FIT, or the
State; 2) the report has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate Regional official; 3) a decision
has been made en whether to proceed with further site evaluation work; and 4) the SI report has been
recorded in CERCLIS.
S/F-la SI Candidate Ooppleted to Date (Report quarterly percent of universe completed to date)
The number of SI candidates is determined by the number of sites in CERCLIS that have had a PA completion
and, based on the PA completions, have not been classified as "no further action." Tne number of Sis
completed to date is divided into the number of candidates to determine the percent of SI candidates
completed to date.
S/C-2 Number of Sites Where Activity has Started - Number of NPL sites (Final and Proposed) where on site
has begun. On-site activity is characterized by a removal action under the direction of EPA or
through an: Administrative Order, Consent Decree, or judgement; or where a first RI/FS has been
implemented at the site.
Fund-Financed;
PRP-Financed;
A Fund Removal counts toward this target when:
1) Ihe Action Memorandum has been approved by the On Site Coordinator
(OSC), Regional Administrator (RA), or Assistant Administrator (AA); and,
2) a contract has been signed for an EPA or U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
on-site removal; and 3) an obligation for the removal has either been
recorded in the Financial Management System (FMS), or has been reported
and documented in CERCLIS or when the OSC activates $50,000; and 4) there is
no current or previous on-site Fund-financed or PRP Removal activity;
and 5) on-site removal work has begun. Ine date the on-site work began is the start
date for the removal action.
A Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) Removal counts toward this measure when:
1) there is no current or prior on-site Fund-financed or PRP removal
activity; and 2) there is on-site removal activity financed by the
PRP in compliance with an Administrative Order (Unilateral or On Consent)
or Consent Decree, or judgment. Tne date the on-site work began
as entered in CKRCLJS will be considered the start date for the PRP Removal.
It the PKP does not comply with a Unilateral Order, credit is not given.
Where a PRP is in substantial non-compliance, credit will be withdrawn.
OSWER - 2
12/89
-------
Offioe of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
FY 1990
Superfund Definitions
Site status (NPL or Non-NPL) will be determined by the status indicated in CERCLI3 when aoconplishment
reports are pulled. A First KL/FS means that there has been no prior RI/FS activity at that site.
Fund-Financed: A Fund Program RI/FS start is counted when: 1) Either a contract has been signed
by the Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PCMD), or a Cooperative
Agreement has been signed by the Regional Administrator to conduct a RI/FS, and
2) obligations have been recorded or documented in CERCLIS as of the end of the
reporting period and 3) there is no prior settlement with a PRP for a RI/FS.
The Fund-financed Start is defined as the date of first obligation for a: RI, FS, or RI/FS at site.
Obligations for forward planning activities, comnunity relations planning and/or similar
support activities do not constitute an RI/FS start. Fund-financed RI/FS include: Federal (F),
State (S), State Enforcement (SE) and in-house (EP) lead projects as these leads are used in the FY 1990
SCAP Manual. The appropriate dates must be recorded in CERCLIS.
PRP-Financed; A PRP lead RI/FS Start occurs when an Administrative Order on Consent is
issued or a Consent Decree is referred to Headquarters or the Department of
Justice (DOJ) for a RI/FS, and there has been no Fund obligation and no previous
settlements for: RI, FS, or RI/FS (see above). The start date is defined as the
last signature date by the appropriate official or party (e.g., the RA, DOJ, or
private party on the Administrative Order on Consent), or the date of referral to
Headguarters of a Consent Decree for the PRP to conduct the RI/FS. If the PRPs
are performing the RI/FS under a State Order or comparable Enforcement document
and the site is covered by a: State Enforcement Cooperative Agreement, Superfund
Memorandum of Agreement (SMOA), or other EPA/State agreement; credit will be given based
on the date the State order is signed by the last appropriate official or party. (If
there is a Settlement for Multiple Operable Units, the start date for the first RI/FS
would be the last signature date by the appropriate Federal agency or party.) The
appropriate dates must be recorded in CERCLIS.
PRP-financed RI/FS's include: Responsible Party (RP), Mixed Funding (MR), and Responsible Party
under State order with Federally funded oversight (PS).
OSWER - 3
12/89
-------
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
FY 1990
Superfund Definitions
A shift between a Fund, or PRP RI/FS, can occur when there has been a Fund obligation, and work
has not proceeded beyond the RI/FS Work Plan approval stage. If a PRP takes over a RI/FS before or
at this juncture, the RI/FS lead at this site should be changed from the Fund to PRP. If the PRP
begins the RI/FS and it is subsequently taken over by the Fund the same criteria apply.
Site status (NPL or Non-NPL) will be determined by the status indicated in CERCUS when
acocnplishment reports are pulled..
S/C-2a NPL Sites Addressed to Date (Report quarterly as percent of universe)
The number of proposed or final NPL sites where a removal action, RI/FS, enforcement
action (Section 106 referral or Unilateral order) or RCRA corrective action has taken place.
RI/FS starts includes Federal Facility, State Enforcement (with or without EPA involvement), and
State financed projects.
S/C-3 Number of Remedies Selected at NPL Sites
A Record of Decision (ROD) has been signed by either the Regional Administrator or Assistant
Administrator for OSWER, and the appropriate date has been recorded in CERCLIS. Ine signature date by
the RA or AA represents the ROD completion date. Remedies selected include: Federal (F), Federal
Enforcement (FE), and Federal Facility (FF).
S/C-4 Number of NPL sites where Remedial Design (RD) activity has been Started
Funding or PRP Contract Award for Remedial Designs at NPL Sites
Fund Financed:
PRP-Financed:
Sites where an obligation has been made under contract, Inter-Agency Agreement (IAG),
or Cooperative Agreement, to conduct a Design on site. Obligations for design assistance
or technical assistance do not constitute a Remedial Design Start. The obligation must
be recorded and documented in CERCLIS at the end of the reporting period. Fund financed
design include: Federal (F), State (S) , State Enforcement (SE) and in-house (EP) lead
projects as these leads are used in FY 1990 SCAP Manual.
Credit for any RD start is given when one of the following (as recorded in CERCLIS)
occurs; Pursuant to a Enforcement settlement document, the date on which the PRP(s) award
a contract to conduct Design at the site: 2) Pursuant to an Enforcement settlement
-------
Office of Solid Waste and
Response
FY 1990
Superfund Definitions
of the RD notice to proceed; or 3) Where the PRP(s) have performed a KL/FS under State
Order or comparable Enforcement document and the site is covered by State Enforcement
Cooperative Agreement and EPA has approved the select remedy, credit will be given based
on the issuance of a State Order for RD (or RD/RA) or, if the RD is covered by a pre-
existing State Order, the RD Notice to Proceed date.
PRP-financed designs include Responsible Party (RP)
order with Federally funded oversight (PS).
Mixed Funding (MR) and Responsible Party under State
S/C-5 Number of NPL sites where Remedial Action (RAj activity has been Started
Funding for Remedial Actions at NPL Sites
Sites where an obligation has been made under a contract, IAG or Cooperative agreement to conduct
a construction activity at the site. The obligation must be recorded and documented in
CERCLIS as of the end of the reporting period. Only Federal and State lead projects are included
in this category.
RemedialActions by FRPs at NPL Sites
Credit for an RA Start is given when one of the following occurs, and has been recorded in
CERCLIS. 1) The RD is completed under terms of the RD/RA settlement decision
(Administrative Order or Consent Decree). The date on which EPA approves the RP design package
determines the quarter in which the RA start is counted. 2) The RD is completed under
terms of a Section 106 Judgment or Order which includes RA work. The date on which
EPA approves the PRP's design package and enters the date in CERCLIS determines the guarter in
which the RA start is counted. 3) When the RD is completed under a State order or comparable
Enforcement document, and the site is covered by a State Enforcement Cooperative Agreement or
Superfund Memorandum of Agreement (SMQA), and EPA has approved the Remedial Design package,
credit will be given for a Remedial Action start based on the date the design package
was approved by EPA. 4) Where the Fund has completed the RD and the PRPs are either in compliance
with a Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) or have reached settlement for the RA. The date of
conpliance with the UAO, or the date the Consent Decree is referred to HQ or DOJ (as recorded in
CERCLJS) will be the basis for credit. Where a PRP is in significant non-compliance with the UAO,
credit will be withdrawn.
OSWER - 5
12/89
-------
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Waste
FY 1990
Superfund Definitions
** Combined (FUnd and PRP) quarterly and annual targets will remain constant throughout the fiscal
year. However, in the case of a FRP takeover at a targeted site, a corresponding PRP SCAP target
increase, Fund SCAP target decrease will occur automatically.
S/C-6 Number of NPL Sites where All Remedial/Removal Implementation has been Completed
Number of sites where all construction or removal actions for operable units have been completed and the
site meets on of the following criteria: 1) a no further action Ruu nas been signed by the Assistant
Administrator or the Regional Administrator; or 2) a final construction inspection have
been completed, and the Regional Administrator signs an interim or final Superfund Close-out Report which
summarizes the site condition and construction activities and demonstrates that the NCP criteria for
deletion have been met or that the only remaining activity is Long Term Response or performance
monitoring, and the appropriate data has been recorded in CERCUS. Ine date the interim or final
Superfund Close-out Report is signed is the date of the Final Completion; or 3) the final cleanup at a
site is based upon a Removal Action:
Fund-Financed:
PRP-Financed:
A site is completed through a removal action when: 1) The OSC demobilizes the cleanup
contractor, and; 2) conditions specified in the Action Memorandum have been met and a
completion date has been entered into CERCUS.
A site is completed through a removal action when: 1) A PRP has completed the removal
action under the terms of an Administrative Order (Unilateral or On Consent), Consent
Decree or judgement, and the Region has certified that date through entering a completion
date in CERCLLS.
OSWER - 6
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
Achieve and maintain
maximum levels of clean-up
through removal enforcement
Achieve
levels of
reimbursement of Trust Fund
monies expended in site
clean-up.
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Superfund Enforcement
MEASURE
COUE FREQUENCY
Administrative Orders for Removal Action
Report Administrative Orders (Unilateral or On Consent)
for Removal Action signed and issued by EPA within the
quarter.
(a) NPL
(b) Non-NPL
Cost Recovery Actions Greater Than $200,000
Target and report sites for civil referrals, with or "
without settlement, for greater than or equal to
$200,000.
(a) Section 107 Site Referrals for Pre-Remedial
Actions.
(b) Section 107 Site Referrals for Remedial Actions.
(c) Section 106/107 Site Referrals Pre-Remedial
Actions.
(d) Section 106/107 Site Referrals Remedial Actions.
Cost Recovery Achieved
Report the total amount of dollars resulting from cost
recovery achieved through: litigation, settlements,
administrative orders, and oversight costs. _/
/ Definition at end of program measures.
* 'In is measure requires Regional targets.
S/E-1
(a)
(b)
S/E-2
(a)*
(b)*
(c)
(d)
S/E-3
Q 1,2,3,4
By Regior
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 7
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Superfund Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Section 106 or 106/107 Referrals or Unilateral Orders
for RD/RA J
(a) Sites with Section 106 Referrals Without
Settlement
(b) Sites with Section 106 Referrals with Settlement
(c) Sites issued, RD/RA Unilateral Administrative
Orders
For Federal Facilities on the NPL or Proposed for tlie
NFL
Target and Report Inter-Agency Agreements (lAGs)
Credit is given for lAGs signed at NPL or proposed NPL
sites for a RI, FS, RD, RA or RD/RA only. Credit is
given for any of the following: A signed IAG for a RI,
FS, RD, RA or RD/RA only;_/
- Issuance of a RCRA Section 3008 (h) Corrective
Action Order
- Referral of a CERCLA Section 106 Administrative
Order to the Department of Justice (DOT) for
concurrence;
- Issuance of a RCRA Permit addressing all releases
and all CERCLA requirements; or
- A formal referral has been made to the Assistant
Administrator, OSWER, for dispute resolution.
A site can only receive credit once under this measure
/ Definition at end of program measures.
* TTus measure requires Regional targets.
S/E-4
(a)*
(b)*
(c)*
S/E-5*
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 8
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Superfund Enforcement Definitions
S/E-1 Administrative Orders for Removal Actions
Credit is provided where a Section 106 administrative order (Unilateral or On Consent) has been signed by the
Regional Administrator and the date has been recorded in CERCLIS. Credit is given for each order issued at the
site. Excluded from this measure are administrative orders for site access. This is a reporting measure for
(a) NPL and (b) Non-NFL sites.
S/E-2* Cost Recovery Actions Greater than $200.000
Targets will be established for sites, with or without settlement, for past expenditures greater than or equal
to $200,000 under: (a) Section 107 (only) for "Pre-Remedial Action (RA)11 events (Removal, IRM, ERA, RI/FS, RD),
(b) Section 107 (only) for Remedial Action, and other Pre-RA site response. Targets are based en the number of
sites addressed in the referral and must include at a iriinimum all responses greater than $200,000 where there
is a potential statute of limitation (SOL) problem and there are viable PRPs. If a Region fails to resolve a
SOL site, it will be considered to have missed the target even if it refers cases in excess of its target.
Regions are responsible for meeting the respective targets for both (a) Pre-RA and (b) Remedial Action
referrals.
Regions must report sites with or without settlement greater than or equal to $200,000 for (c) Section 106/107
Pre-RA actions (Removals, et. al.) and (d) Section 106/107 Remedial Actions (RA et. al.) and other Pre-RA
events.
Credit for any of the above categories is based on the Regional Administrator's signature date on the referral
transmittal letter (as reflected in CERCLIS) to the Office of Enforcement Compliance .Monitoring (OECM) or the
Department of Justice (DOJ). In addition, credit will be withdrawn if a case addressing a site is returned by
OECM or DOJ for additional work. Credit will be reinstated upon re-referral and will be based on the quarter
of re-referral. In the event that a case is referred in one fiscal year and returned to the Region in the
following fiscal year and credit is not withdrawn, no credit will be provided for re-referral.
The Following are Targeted Measures:
(a) Credit is given when a Region has referred to OECM or DOJ, with or without settlement, a civil action
addressing a site under Section 107 (only) of CERCLA for any combination of the following: Removal, ERA,
IRM, Rl/FS, RD (Pre-RA site work).
(b) Credit is given when a Region has referred to OECM or DOJ, with or without settlement, a civil action
OSWER - 9
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Superfund Enforcement Definitions
addressing a site under Section 107 (only) of CERCLA for a
previous Fund financed site work (i.e. Removal, RI/FS, RD).
Tne Followincr are Reoortina Measures onlv:
Remedial Action (RA) response, plus any other
(c) Credit is given when a Region has referred to OECM or DOT, with or without settlement, a civil action
addressing a site under Section 106/107 of CERCLA for any combination of the following: Removal, ERA, IRM,
RI/FS, or RD.
(d) Credit is given when a Region has referred to OECM or DOJ, with or without settlement, a civil action
addressing a site under Sections 106/107 of CERCLA for Remedial Action (RA) response plus any other
previous Fund financed site work (i.e. Removal, RI/FS, RD).
S/E-3 Cost Recovery Achieved
Tnis is the sum of all cost recovery achieved. This includes: 1) litigation (upon entry of a judgement), 2)
settlement (upon referral of a Consent Decree by the Region to HQ or DOJ), 3) Administrative Orders (upon
execution of last signature by EPA or the PRP), 4) Administrative Settlements, 5) bankruptcy settlements (upon
payment), 6) recovery of oversight costs (upon billing), credit is given for the amount shown in CERCLIS. TTiis
is a reporting measure only.
S/E-4* Section 106 or 106/107 Referrals or Unilateral Orders for RD/RA
Credit for site referrals in categories (a) and (b) is based on the Regional Administrator's signature date on
the referral transmittal letter to the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring (OECM) of the Department
of Justice (DOJ) as recorded in CERCLIS. If a Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) issued at a site under
category (c) is in compliance (as recorded in CERCLIS) credit will also be provided in category (b). Credit
for the issuance of a UAO at a site is based on the Regional Administrator's signature date on the order (not
the effective date), as recorded in CERCLIS. In addition, credit will be withdrawn if a case addressing a site
is returned by OECM or DOJ for additional work. Credit will be reinstated upon re-referral and will be based
on the quarter of re-referral. In the event that a case is referred in one fiscal year and returned to the
Region in the following fiscal year and credit is not withdrawn, no credit will be provided for re-referral.
OSWER - 10
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Superfund Enforcement Definitions
The Following are Targeted Measures:
Target sites in all three categories. Should a targeted site in category (a) reach a settlement (Consent
Decree) prior to referral without settlement, the target for category (a) will automatically be decreased by
one, while the target for category (b) will automatically be increased by one. Should a targeted site in
category (b) fail to reach a settlement (Consent Decree), and the Region refers the site (without settlement)
per category (a), then the target for" category (a) will automatically increase by one, while the target for
category (b) will automatically decrease by one.
(a) Sites with: Section 106 or Section 106/107 Referrals without settlement for RD and/or RA, transmitted to
Headquarters or to DOT. These referrals must seek injunctive relief for FRP response at a site. Sites
addressed for preliminary relief or penalties do not count toward this target.
(b) Sites with: Section 106 or Section 106/107 Referrals, with settlement (Consent Decree) for RD and/or RA
transmitted to HQ or DQJ for judicial cx>ncurrence. In addition, credit will be given for those Unilateral
Administrative Orders (UAO) at sites where the PRP is in compliance, and will be based on the order date.
Should the PRP become substantially out of compliance with the UAO, credit will be withdrawn from this
category and will be reinstated only when the FRP returns to compliance or will be counted in category (a)
only upon a referral to DOJ or OEOM.
(c) Sites where Unilateral Administrative Orders are issued for RD and/or RA. The orders must compel the PRPs
to initiate site work (i.e. not just for site access). This category counts all orders issued at sites,
not just those in compliance.
For All Facilities listed on the Federal Facilities Docket
S/E-5* Interagencv Agreements Signed, at NPL or Proposed NPL Facilities for RI. FS. RD. RA or RD/RA(s) Only
A site can only receive credit once under this measure. Credit is given for the following when recorded and
documented in CERCIIS:
- A signed Interagency Agreement for a RI/FS/RD/RA or RD/RA,
- Issuance of JJection 3008(h) Corrective Action Order, **
- Referral of a Section 106 Administrative Order to DOJ for concurrence,
- Issuaiwv (it a KCRA i>ernut atidrossinq all releases and all CERCLA requirements ** or
- A lot mil tfl«'tt.il IMS been iuui<> to AA-GS"WKK for dispute resolution. **
** Not currently tracked in CERCLJS
OSWER - 11
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
Make final RCRA permit
determination by the
statutory deadlines.
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
FY 1990
RCRA Permitting
MEASURE
Permitting Measures (Report the following for a) land
disposal, b) incineration, c) storage and treatment.)
Public notice of draft RCRA permit issued._/
Notice of intent to deny RCRA permit issued._/
Notice of availability of closure plan issued._/
RCRA operating permit issued. +_/
RCRA operating permit denied. +_/
Closure plan approved. *_/
RCRA post-closure permit issued._/
+ This measure requires Regional target for
incinerator; and storage and treatment facilities.
* This measure requires Regional target for incinerator
and land disposal facilities.
/ (Definitions at end of program measures.
OOCE FREQUOTV
R/c-i(a)
R/C-l(b)
R/C-l(c)
R/C-l(e)
R/C-l(f)
R/C-l(g)
R/C-l(h)
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 12
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Permitting
MEASURE
SFMS OOCE FREQUENCY
Modify permits to
expanded capacity and
protection of ground water
and other environmental
media.
Make decisions on requests
for waivers from
regulations.
permit Modification Measures _/ (Report following
information for all facilities.)
Number of- significant permit modifications issued year
to date.
Number of significant permit modifications denied year
to date.
Waiver Requests
Number of waiver requests granted year to date.
Number of waiver requests denied year to date.
Definitions at end of program measures
R/C-2(a)
R/C-2 (b)
R/C-3(a)
R/C-3(b)
OSWER - 13
12/89
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA PERMITTING DEFINITIONS
Public notice of draft RCRA permit issued: The date the public notice of draft permit is issued.
Notice of intent to dav RCRA permit issued; 1t*e date the public notice of intent to deny a RCRA permit is issued.
Notice of availability of closure plan issued; The date the public notice is issued.
RCRA operating permit issued; The figf** the RCRA permit is jggu
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Improved compliance of hazardous
waste handling with RCRA
requirements.
Ensure that timely and appro-
priate Enforcement action is
taken against SNC's.
Inspections
Target and report, year-to-date, the number of Land Disposal
facilities that have received an inspection in FY90.
(Combined- EPA/State target). J
Target and report, year-to-date, the number of
treatment or storage facilities, other than land disposal
facilities, that have received an inspection in FY90.
(Combined EPA/State target). J
Target and report, year-to-date, the number of Federal,
State, and local government TSDs (including Land Disposal)
that received an inspection in FY90. (Combined EPA/State
target) J
Significant Noncompliance - Snapshot
Report the number of TSD facilities (including Federal
facilities) in SNC at this point in time. J
Of the TSD facilities in R/E-2 (a), report the number of TSD
facilities that have been addressed by a formal enforcement
action, but have not returned to physical compliance. J
Of the TSD facilities in R/E-2 (a), report the number of TSD
facilities in SNC that have not had a formal enforcement
action (to resolve all violations causing the facility to
be in SNC) within 135 days of the inspection. J
/ Detmition at end of program measures.
* 'Hiis measure requires Regional targets.
R/E-l(a)*
R/E-l(b)*
R/E-l(c)*
R/E-2(a)
R/E-2(b)
R/E-2(c)
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER
12/89
15
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS OOCE FREQUENCY
Ensure compliance by Federal
Facilities.
Ensure that violators of the
Land Disposal Restrictions are
returned to compliance.
Federal Facilities - Snapshot
Report the number of Federally owned or operated TSD
facilities that are in SNC, at this point-in-time. _/
Report the number of Federal TSD facilities in SNC which
have been addressed with one or more appropriate initial
enforcement action(s) for all SNC violations, but have not
returned to compliance. _/
Report the number of Federal TSD facilities in SNC which have
not had an initial formal enforcement action (to resolve all
violations causing the facility to be in SNC) within 135 days
of the inspection. _/
For those Federal facilities where EPA has the enforcement
lead, report the number of facilities where the final EPA
regional action has been completed within 120 days of the
initial action addressing all violations causing the
facility to be in SNC. _/
Land Disposal Restrictions Noncoroplianoe - Snapshot
Report the number of generators generating over 1000kg of
waste that receive a Land Ban inspection in FY90. J
Report the number of generators that are classified as
HPVs due to Land Ban violations. _/
[*.-{ imlions at end of program measures.
R/E-3(a)
R/E-3(b)
R/E-3(c)
R/E-3(d)
R/E-4(a)
R/E-4(b)
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 16
12/RQ
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Enforcement
OBJECTIVE MEASURE SWS OOCE FRBCUD«a
'l*a provide a measure of
enforcement activity across
all media.
Enforcement Actions
Report the number of formal administrative actions
issued, year-to-date, not including Sections 3008 (h),
3013, and 7003. (Report EPA and State separately.)
Report the number of formal administrative
enforcement actions issued, year-to-date, not
including Sections 3008 (h), 3013, and 7003.
(Report EPA and State combined.)
Report the number of State civil and criminal cases
filed against Subtitle C handlers.
Note: EPA civil referals will be taken from the
OECM docket system. EPA criminal actions
will be tracked by NEIC.
R/E-5(a)
R/E-5(b)
R/E-5(C)
Q 1/2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 17
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Enforcement Definitions
R/E-l(a) Inspections: All operating and 50% of the closed Land Disposal Facilities (except Class I LTIC wells, clean
closed and delisted facilities) must be inspected in FY 1990. Once inspected in FY 1990, a facility
should not be recounted in this category. This measure is intended to evaluate whether these facilities
have been addressed with a full compliance inspection under RCRA Sections 3007 (c), (d) and (e).
(Includes Federal, State and local facilities.)
Inspections to be counted are Compliance Evaluation Inspections (CEIs).
R/E-l(b) Inspections: All Treatment and Storage Facilities (TSFs) owned/operated by Federal/State/local entities,
and all incinerators (in FY90, we expect all incinerators to be permitted), must be inspected in FY 1990.
In addition, inspections mist be conducted at TSFs not inspected in FY89.
Inspections to be counted are Compliance Evaluation Inspections.
R/E-l(c) Federal, State and local TSDs: These numbers are a subset of the numbers targeted and reported
in (a) and (b). Thus, Federal, State and local facilities are counted both in (c) and in (a) or (b).
State inspections of State and Local facilities will not be counted toward this target.
R/E-2(a) SNCs identified during FY90 will be those TSD facilities (including Federal Facilities) that are classified
High Priority Violators (HPVs) according to the revised Enforcement Response Policy (ERP). These facilities
are indicated on the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Log. Note: Included are those TSD facilities
that are designated HPVs because of Land Disposal restriction violations.
* For the definition of formal enforcement at Federal Facilities, see measure R/E-3.
R/E-2(b) Formal enforcement actions include Section 3008(a) complaints, or equivalent State orders, as well as
referrals for judicial action (including criminal) made to the Department of Justice (DOJ), State
Attorney General (AG), or other appropriate official. Both administrative orders and judicial referrals will
count as a formal enforcement action addressing a SNC.
OSWER - 18
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Enforcement Definitions
R/E-3(a) SNCs identified during FY90 will be those Federal Facilities that are classified HWs according
to the revised ERP.
R/E-3(b) Appropriate Enforcement action for a State is a formal Enforcement response as defined under
R/E-2(a). Appropriate Enforcement response for EPA is a Notice of Noncompliance to the Federal
agency or a 3008(a) complaint to the contract operator of a government owned facility.
R/E-3(d) Final regional action is a Federal Facility Compliance Agreement (FFCA); or a referral of the
oustanding compliance issues to the AA, OSWER for resolution in accordance with the March 24, 1988
Elevation Policy; or a final order with the contract operator of a government owned facility; or a
formal regional determination that the facility returned to compliance within 90 days of issuance of
the Notice of Noncompliance, and therefore, the FFCA or elevation of unresolved compliance issues is
not required.,
R/E-4(a) Applies only to generators generating over 1000KG of waste. The types of inspections that are to be
reported under this measure are: Compliance Evaluation Inspections (CEI), sampling inspections, and
other inspections that include a land ban check list.
R/E-4(b) Refer to the ERP guidelines and Land Disposal restrictions guidance for designating generators as HPVs.
OSWER - 19
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Corrective Action
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Ensure that TSD facilities
with releases take appropriate
corrective action under either
the permitting or enforcement
programs.
RCRA Facility Assessment - Report the number of facilities
where the RCRA Facility Assessment or CERCLA Site
Investigation has been completed. _/
RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Inposed - Target
environmentally significant facilities for issuance of
formal enforcement,orders, or permits, requiring RCRA
Facility Investigations (RFIs). _J
(Targets are subject to negotiation between
Regions and HQ.)
RFI Workplan Approved or Notice of Deficiency. _/
Interim Measures - Report when interim measures are
required of a owner/operator. __/
RCRA Corrective Action Remedy Selected - Report the number
of facilities where a corrective action remedy has been
selected or determination made. _/
Corrective Action Design Approved - Report the number of
facilities where a corrective action design has been
approved by EPA or an authorized state. _/
Establish the number of facilities which have an ongoing
RFI, CMS or CMI at the beginning of FY 90. Report the
Corrective Action oversight inspections at these
during FY90.
/ Definition at end ot program measures.
* '111is measure requires Regional targets
R/J-1
R/J-2*
R/J-3
R/J-4
R/J-5
R/J-6
R/J-7
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 20
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
RCRA Corrective Action Definitions
R/J-1 Report the number of RCRA Facility Assessments (RFAs) completed or the Site Investigation is done. Date the,
Director approves the result of the RFA. This can be the date the Director signs a letter notifying the
facility whether a RFI will or will not be necessary.
R/J-2* RFI Imposed. Formal enforcement orders include 3008(h) orders, State equivalent orders, Section 3013
orders, Section 7003 orders, CERCLA Sections 104 and 106, or judicial decrees or court orders that require
RCRA Facility Investigations (RFIs) at RCRA facilities. Permits include operating and post-closure permits.
In seme cases permit modifications of earlier State issued permits will count if the modification requires
a RFI. Targets will be set through negotiations between Headquarters (HQ) and the Regions.
R/J-3 Report the number of RFI workplans approved or Notices of Deficiencies issued. Letter from the State or EPA
approving or rejecting the RFI plan prepared by a facility in response to an order, permit or permit
modification with a schedule of compliance imposing an RFI obligation upon the facility.
R/J-4 These are remedial activities required of an O/O to: abate, minimize, stabilize, mitigate, or eliminate
a release(s) or threat of a release that is initiated prior to selection of a final remedy, and is
specified in a permit or enforcement order.
R/J-5 Permit, permit modification, or enforcement order specifying the corrective measures remedy for a facility or
a letter from the Director to the facility O/O approving the corrective measures remedy selected by the
facility in response to a permit, permit modification, or enforcement order requiring the facility to select
a remedy or a decision based on the results of an RFI that further corrective measures are not necessary.
R/J-6 The action by which the State or EPA approves the corrective measures design.
R/J-7 During FY 1990, each TSD facility with an on-going corrective action (i.e. RFI Workplan Approved)
should receive at least one site visit. This visit will be aimed at overseeing at least one of
the following activities: well drilling, sampling, treatment, and/or removal activities. The inspection
types that count are: CEI, CME, Sampling Inspections, and follow-up evaluations with Corrective Action
compliance schedule reviews.
OSWER - 21
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Enforcement
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Develop the enforce-
ment program for
Sections 302, 303,
304, 311, and 312
Report the number of:
a) Investigations of possible violations
of Section 304.
b) Investigations of possible Sections 302,
303, 311, or 312 violations (do not
include "if in (a)) .
Report the number of:
a) Section 304 violations identified
b) Facilities determined by the Region or
State (and reported to the Region) to
be in violation of Sections 302, 303,
311, or 312 (do not include if in (a)).
Report the number of
a) Administrative Orders
b) Judicial referrals and
c) State orders regarding violations of
Sections 302, 303, 304, 311, and 312
Report the number of violators where:
a) informal or
b) formal enforcement actions by EPA or
State have resulted in non-compliers
returning to compliance.
C/E-1
C/E-2
C/E-3
C/E-4
OSWER -22
12/89
Ql,2,3,4
By State
Ql,2,3,4
By State
Ql,2,3,4
By State
Ql,2,3,4
By State
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Enforcement Definitions
Investigations include in-house review of documents, including CERCLA Section 104
information requests and Accidental Release Information Program Surveys and field
evaluations.
State includes formal actions taken by SERC, administering State Agency or local
committees to bring violator into compliance.
OSWER - 23
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY1990
Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Program
MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
To improve State/
local chemical
emergency
preparedness and
enhance their
response
capabilities.
To obtain infor-
mation about the
causes of chemical
accidents, safety,
and prevention
measures taken by
facilities as a
result of accidents
Report on the status of Title III
implementation in each of your States
through completion of the Title III
State Status Report.
Report and describe technical assistance
activities in which EPA conducted, sponsored,
assisted in developing, or participated.
Report on number of exercises in which EPA
provided assistance to or participated in to
test a Federal, State, or local plan.
Report number of Accidental Release
Information Program (ARIP) questionnaires
sent to facilities having releases.
Report on number of chemical safety audits
conducted.
*This measure requires Regional targets.
CEP-1*
CEP-2*
CEP-3*
CEP-4
CEP-5*
Q2,4
By Region
01,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 24
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
CEPP DEFINITIONS
SIMULATION EXERCISES are table-top or full-field exercises conducted to test or
evaluate contingency plan. Regions are expected to provide technical or
programmatic assistance to other federal agencies, States or communities to develop
the exercise and/or to actively participate in the exercise (e.g., exercise leader,
evaluator, facilitator). Exercise development should include EPA involvement
throughout the planning process for the exercise. Providing a copy of guidance
material does not constitute fulfillment of this requirement. The Region must write
a post-exercise report describing the assistance provided and/or participation in the
exercise and the outcome of the exercise. This report should be held in the Regional
office and made available for Regional Reviews. Regional assistance or participation
in testing an internal EPA plan will not count towards meeting this measure.
TITLE T_II^_STATE STATUS REPORT is the questionnaire developed to answer a range of
questions on the status of Title III in each State, including Local Emergency Planning
Committee plan submissions, reporting compliance under Title III, Title III State
legislation, State Emergency Response Commission funding and staffing, etc. The format
for this report was originally distributed to each Region in October 1988 and will
continue to be supplied by Headquarters. If a State in a Region does not provide
the information in the Title III State Status Report, a Region can meet this measure
by reporting on the State information available to the Region and providing a summary
of State status and progress in Title III implementation. The word "State" in this
measure refers to each State and territory in the Region.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE is the provision of expertise to improve preparedness and prevention
capabilities and programs. It includes both programmatic and scientific assistance. This
assistance might be delivered through direct consultation (in the field with the recipient)
OSWER - 25
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
CEPP DEFINITIONS
It does not include formal training courses or the provision of equipment.
This assistance includes, but is not limited to:
assistance in organizing, developing, and implementing preparedness,
prevention, or community right-to-know programs and activities;
assistance in organizing and conducting CEPP-related workshops;
assistance in development and review of emergency plans (including hazards analysis);
assistance in information management or risk communication;
assistance in development of haz-mat teams;
assistance in dispersion modeling and air monitoring;
assistance in evaluation or installation of alarm/alerting systems
ACCIDENTAL RELEASE INFORMATION PROGRAM is designed to accomplish two basic objectives:
a) To focus high-level management attention on facilities having repeated or
•serious' releases, which may stimulate them to undertake prevention initiatives
on their own; and
b) To provide EPA with accurate information on the causes of releases and the
activities currently underway in the private sector to prevent them from
occurring.
TRIGGERED RELEASES
ARIP is focusing on releases which are 'serious.' Currently, the criteria or triggers
being utilized to identify 'serious1 releases are:
o Starting with the fourth release and ending with the tenth release in a twelve-month
period.
o A release greater than 1,000 Ibs. for hazardous substances having RQs = 1, 10, or
100 Ibs. or a release of 10,000 Ibs. for hazardous substances having RQs = 1,000 or
5,000 Ibs.
o Any release resulting in death, injury, or severe environmental damage.
o A release of an extremely hazardous substance above the RQ.
OSWER - 26
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
CEPP DEFINITIONS
LETTERS/QUESTIONNAIRES
Once a facility has Met a trigger, the Region is required to draft a letter combining the
authorities of CERCLA, SARA, CAA, CWA, & RCRA, send it to the plant manager, along with the
questionnaire EPA has developed. A copy of the response must be sent to Headquarters.
ON-SITE CHEMICAL AUDIT is an on-site inspection of the entire process/handling operations at
a site from a safety standpoint. It is an audit of safety procedures, facility equipment, training
and contingency planning, as well as management commitment.
OSWER - 27
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Underground Storage Tanks
MEASURE
SFMS CODE FREQUENCY
Support development of, and
review and decide on, UST
state program applications,
in order to both encourage
state-run programs and
ensure adequate national
consistency.
Promote the cleanup of
pollution resulting from
leaking underground storage
tanks.
State Program Approval (UST-1)
Report on the following by Region:
Number of states submitting ocmplete applications for
state program approval.
Number of states with authorized programs.
Cleanup Leaking USTs (UST-2)
Report on the following by Region:
Number of sites cleanups for petroleum releases
initiated, by either responsible parties or states
(Report separately for responsible party lead, state
lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust
Fund money).
Number of petroleum releases under control, by either
responsible parties or states (Report separately for
responsible party lead, state lead with Trust Fund
money, and state lead with no Trust Fund money).
Numbt ' of site cleanups for petroleum releases
oompl ited, by either responsible parties or states
(Report separately for responsible party lead, state
lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust
Fund money) .
* This measure requires regional targets.
UST-
l(a)*
UST-1(b)
UST-2(a)
UST-2(b)
UST-2(c)
OSWER - 28
12/89
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
Underground Storage Tanks
MEASURE
Encourage compliance with
the UST regulations during
the transition period.
SIMS CODE FREQUENCY
Prevention Program (UST-3)
Report on the following by Region:
Number of states with formal agreements to implement the
federal UST program during the transition period.
UST-3
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
OSWER - 29
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
UST PROGRAM DEFINITIONS
(2) (b) Number of petroleum releases under control, by either responsible parties or states (Report separately for
responsible party lead, state lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust Fund money): means total
number of petroleum releases from an UST at which the state or responsible party under state supervision has
performed Ali of the following tasks: 1) stopping the flow of free product into the environment; 2) mitigating
any fire and safety hazards (e.g., abating dangerous levels of fumes in basements of homes and other effected
buildings); 3) managing contaminated soils as directed by the state; 4) determining the presence of free
product floating on the water table and beginning removal of it according to a plan submitted to the state; and
5) determining whether drinking water supplies are contaminated and assuring that alternative supplies of
potable water are available when the state determines that the water supplies should not be used. Report
responsible party lead, state lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust Fund money cleanups
separately. This measure includes all releases under control by a state, whether involving federal funds under
a LUST Trust Fund cooperative agreement or involving only state funds. (This is a cumulative measure. The
number in the first guarter of FY 1990 should include those sites with action completed in FY 1987, FY 1988,
and FY 1989.)
(2) (c) Number of site cleanups for petroleum releases completed, by either responsible parties or states {Report
separately for responsible party lead, state lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust Fund
money): means the total number of specific sites of a petroleum release from an UST at which the state has
determined that no further cleanup actions are necessary at the site. Report responsible party lead, state
lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust Fund money cleanups separately. This measure includes
all cleanups completed by a state, whether involving federal funds under a LUST Trust Fund cooperative
agreement or involving only state funds. (This is a cumulative measure. The number in the first quarter of FY
1990 should include those site with cleanups completed prior to FY 1990.)
UST-3: IMPLEMENTATION OF FEDERAL UST PREVENTION PROGRAM
(3) Number of states with formal agreements to implement the federal UST program during the transition period:
means that the state has entered into a formal agreement with the Regional Administrator to implement part or
all the federal UST program during the transition period. These "formal agreements may be included in (1) LUST
Trust Fund cooperative agreement and/or state program grant workplans, (2) separate MOAs, or (3) a combination
of the above. The "transition period" is the time between the date the federal UST regulations are effective
and the dates state programs are approved to operate in lieu of the federal program. The length of the
transition period will vary by state. (Quarters 2, 3, & 4 are reported cumulatively.)
OSWER - 30
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FY 1990
UST PROGRAM DEFINITIONS
UST-1: STATE PROGRAM APFHQVAL
(1) (a) Number of states submitting complete applications for state program approval; means that the state has
submitted an application for program approval and that the Region has determined that the application is
"complete" in accordance with the application components required by the regulations. Information reported
should indicate whether the state application is for a partial program (either petroleum or chemical USTs) or a
complete program (both petroleum and chemicals USTs). This measure requires regional targets. (Quarters 2, 3,
& 4 are reported cumulatively.)
(1) (b) Number of states with authorized programs: means that the state program has been approved by the Regional
Administrator according to the regulations to operate in lieu of the federal program. This measure includes
interim authorizations. Information reported should indicate whether the state program authorization is for a
partial program (either petroleum or chemical USTs) or a ocnplete program (both petroleum and chemical USTs).
(Quarters 2, 3, & 4 are reported cumulatively.)
UST-2: CLEANUP LEAKING USTs
(2) (a) Number of site cleanups for petroleum releases initiated, by either responsible parties or states (Report
separately for responsible partvlead^ state lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust Fund
money): means the total number of specific sites at which the state or responsible party under its supervision
has initiated management of petroleum-contaminated soil, Ojl removal of free petroleum product, OR management or
treatment of dissolved petroleum contamiration caused by a release from an UST. Site investigations and
emergency responses do not quality as cleanup actions. Report responsible-party lead, state lead with Trust
Fund money, and state lead with no Trust Fund money cleanups separately. This measure includes all cleanups
initiated by a state, whether involving federal funds under a LUST Trust Fund cooperative agreement or
involving only state funds. (This is a cumulative measure. The number in the first quarter of FY 1990 should
include those sites with actions initiated in FY 1987, FY 1988, and FY 1989.)
OSWER - 31
12/89
-------
OSWER
SUPERFUND SITE INSPECTIONS COMPLETED
(S/F-1)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
26
0
35
88
57
22
15
9
20
10
282
52
50
70
187
135
44
30
18
40
20
646
91
80
110
286
252
77
52
31
79
35
1093
130
220
150
390
370
110
75
45
120
50
1660
OSWER -
12/89
32
-------
OSWER
NUMBER OF NPL SITES WITH A REMOVAL
ACTION OR RI/FS START(PRP & FUND)(S/C-2)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
1
0
4
1
1
0
0
2
2
12
3
7
3
10
8
3
2
1
2
4
43
9
13
9
16
14
8
5
3
10
7
94
16
19
16
23
20
13
9
5
18
10
149
OSWER - 33
12/89
-------
OSWER 11 NUMBER OF REMEDIES SELECTED AT NPL SITES
CPRP AND FUND) rS/C-3)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
2
3
3
5
3
0
0
4
1
1
22
5
18
9
14
13
0
0
4
1
1
65
10
27
15
19
28
1
2
5
7
3
117
12
29
29
22
39
7
9
8
18
4
177
OSWER -
12/89
34
-------
OSWER 15 NPL SITES WHERE REMEDIAL DESIGN
ACTIVITY STARTED (PRP AND FUND) (S/C-4)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
3
6
3
1
6
0
1
0
0
1
21
3
16
8
5
18
2
3
1
3
2
61
9
25
16
8
28
2
6
1
7
4
106
12
31
19
20
35
5
7
4
15
6
154
OSWER -
12/89
35
-------
OSWER 19 REMEDIAL ACTION ACTIVITIES STARTED
(PRP AND FUND) (S/C-5)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
5
1
2
1
1
0
0
2
2
15
3
8
1
2
5
2
0
0
2
3
26
5
12
1
9
8
2
1
2
2
3
45
6
16
3
9
10
2
3
4
2
4
59
OSWER -
12/89
36
-------
OSWER 22 COMPLETION OF ALL REMEDIAL/REMOVAL
IMPLMTAT'N-NPL SITES(PRP & FUND) fS/C-6)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
5
3
4
0
0
0
0
12
OSWER -
12/89
37
-------
OSWER 27 107 SITE REFERRALS FOR PRE-REMEDIAL
ACTIONS >= 200.000 fS/E-2A)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
1
0
1
6
0
1
0
0
1
10
0
3
2
1
9
0
2
2
0
1
20
3
5
2
3
11
1
2
3
0
2
32
4
6
4
3
13
2
2
4
2
2
42
OSWER -
12/89
38
-------
OSWER 28
107 SITE REFERRALS FOR REMEDIAL
ACTIONS >= 200.000
(S/E-2B)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
1
7
4
1
0
5
5
2
0
2
1
2
22
4
1
4
5
5
3
0
2
1
2
27
OSWER -
12/89
39
-------
OSWER 32 106 CIVIL REFERRALS FOR RD/RA WITHOUT
SETTLEMENT (S/E-4A)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
OSWER -
12/89
40
-------
OSWER 33 106 CIVIL REFERRALS FOR RD/RA WITH
SETTLEMENT (S/E-4B)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
6
2
7
5
1
5
3
1
0
1
1
26
5
12
8
6
7
6
2
0
4
4
54
6
13
11
12
12
6
4
4
8
5
81
OSWER -
12/89
41
-------
OSWER 34 SITES ISSUED RD/RA UNILATERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS
(S/E-4C)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
2
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
4
4
4
7
0
0
0
1
0
21
3
6
5
6
8
1
1
1
5
1
37
OSWER - 42
12/89
-------
OSWER 37 AGREEMENTS SIGNED AT NPL FEDERAL FACIL.
FOR RI/FS/RD/RA OR RD/RA (S/E-5)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
l
0
• o
2
2
0
0
1
0
2
8
3
3
0
5
3
0
1
2
2
5
24
5
4
1
6
3
2
3
3
8
7
42
7
5
1
6
5
2
5
3
12
8
54
OSWER - 43
12/89
-------
OSWER 69 TOTAL NUMBER OF FINAL RCRA PERMIT
DETERMINATIONS
(R/C-lE&n
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
12
15
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
11
24
0
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
0
16
35
0
0
0
0
0
51
OSWER - 44
12/89
-------
OSWER 73 INCINERATOR FINAL PERMIT DETERMINATIONS
(R/C-1E&F)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
6
3
1
2
3
3
0
0
1
19
0
6
3
1
2
4
3
0
1
1
21
0
6
3
1
2
6
3
0
2
1
24
1
6
3
1
2
6
3
0
2
1
25
OSWER - 45
12/89
-------
OSWER 76 STORAGE AND TREATMENT FINAL RCRA PERMIT
DETERMINATIONS (R/C-1E&F)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
3
1
11
13
1
0
1
3
0
33
0
5
2
21
22
4
3
4
3
1
65
0
10
5
42
33
10
8
7
5
5
125
OSWER - 46
12/89
-------
OSWER 82
LDF CLOSURE PLANS APPROVED
(R/C-1G)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
5
5
1
1
1
0
17
1
2
3
4
9
10
2
3
1
2
37
3
5
7
6
11
15
3
5
1
4
60
OSWER - 47
12/89
-------
OSWER 83 INCINERATOR CLOSURE PLANS APPROVED
(R/C-IG)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
5
0
2
0
2
0
1
1
2
1
1
10
0
3
0
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
14
OSWER - 48
12/89
-------
OSWER 93
RFI IMPOSED
(R/J-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
3
0
0
2
1
5
0
0
0
11
1
6
2
2
10
3
7
1
0
3
35
2
13
4
5
16
5
13
2
2
4
66
3
19
10
10
25
9
19
4
4
5
108
OSWER - 49
12/89
-------
OSWER102 NUMBER OF LDF INSPECTIONS YEAR-TO-DATE
(EPA AND STATE) (R/E-1A)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
8
8
18
31
28
20
13
9
14
1
150
20
26
48
79
85
60
26
16
27
6
393
45
46
78
131
171
120
43
34
44
18
730
90
79
120
274
285
219
67
55
61
43
1293
OSWER - 50
12/89
-------
OSWER103 NUMBER OF TSDF INSPECTIONS (OTHER THAN
LDFs) YEAR-TO-DATE (R/E-1B)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
10
21
26
35
39
25
30
4
20
0
210
25
67
73
85
118
50
57
11
51
7
544
52
120
120
135
237
100
90
20
85
16
975
100
213
187
265
395
145
129
30
131
34
1629
OSWER - 51
12/89
-------
OSWER104 INSPECTIONS OF FED. STATE. & LOCAL TSDs
(INCLUDING LDFs) (EPA & STATE) (R/E-1C)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
8
7
5
6
4
5
4
4
0
43
2
17
14
20
18
10
13
8
9
3
114
10
25
22
35
37
28
22
14
25
7
225
22
34
36
80
62
56
30
20
56
36
432
OSWER - 52
12/89
-------
OSWER137 STATES SUBMITTING COMPLETE APPLICATIONS
FOR STATE PROGRAM APPROVAL (UST-1A)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
5
0
1
0
6
1
1
0
3
0
1
13
OSWER - 53
12/89
-------
OSWER 40 # OF TITLE III STATE STATUS REPORTS
COMPLETED (CEP-ll
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
OSWER - 54
12/89
-------
OSWER 41 # OF TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES - EPA ASSISTED
OR PARTICIPATED (CEP-2)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
12
6
12
16
8
5
4
5
6
8
82
24
12
24
32
23
10
12
18
16
16
187
36
18
36
48
38
25
20
33
30
24
308
48
24
48
64
48
40
32
48
40
32
424
OSWER - 55
12/89
-------
OSWER 42 # OF EXERCISES TO TEST A PLAN - EPA
ASSISTED OR PARTICIPATED
(CEP-3)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
0
2
2
I
I
0
1
2
1
11
2
1
4
4
3
2
1
2
5
2
26
4
2
5
6
5
3
2
4
8
3
42
6
3
6
8
6
5
4
6
10
4
58
OSWER - 56
12/89
-------
OSWER 44 # OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AUDITS CONDUCTED
(CEP-5)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
19
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
29
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
40
OSWER - 57
12/89
-------
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM
As of January 1990, the following OSWER projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE;
DUE DATE
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
3
7
37
40
47
54
56
58
62
63
69
74
76
77
79
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
LOCATION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES 7/ 6/92
BURNING HAZ WASTE IN BOILERS/INDUSTRIAL FURNACES 2/28/91
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC 3/10/90
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY CRITERIA 2/27/90
8002 LARGE VOLUME STUDIES - UTILITIES 1/31/89
LISTINGS/PETROLEUM WASTES (WWT) 5/31/90
LISTINGS/WOOD PRESERVING MFG. WASTES 5/30/90
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT SWMU'S 3/30/90
NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN (NCP) REVISION 1/31/90
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM REVISION 3/ 5/90
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 2/28/90
OIL POLLUTION PREVENTION MODIFICATIONS 1/23/91
PROCESSING WASTE REPORT TO CONGRESS 1/31/91
BEVILL PROCESSING WASTES 1/22/90
THIRD THIRD 5/ 8/90
UST - SELF INSURANCE TEST FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 9/ 3/90
FEDERALLY PERMITTED RELEASES OF HAZ. SUBSTANCES 12/14/90
REPORTING CONTINUOUS RELEASES OF HAZ. SUBSTANCES 4/ 6/90
CERCLA COST RECOVERY 7/31/91
STATE COMPLIANCE MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT REGS. 1/14/91
CHEMICAL ACCIDENT PREVENTION COMMITTEE 9/30/90
MINING WASTE MANAGEMENT UNDER RCRA SUBTITLE D 8/31/92
EMISSION CONTROLS FOR HAZ. WASTE INCINERATORS 2/28/91
NO MIGRATION VARIANCE FOR THE WIPP 4/18/90
NCP SUBPART K - ROADMAP FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES 12/ 7/90
OSWER
12/89
- 58
-------
Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
FY 1990 GOCMs
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
FY 1990
Program; Pesticides
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SIMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Protect health and the environment
from any unreasonable effects from
pesticides currently in use.
Restrict or ban the use of
pesticides posing unreasonable
effects to human health and the
environment.
Establishment of 106 comprehensive data requirements in
data call ins.
Publication of 11 reregistration eligibility documents or
"other appropriate regulatory actions".
Product specific reregistration (A determination that a
pesticide meets the requirements of section 3(c)(5).)
[This step doesn't take place until up to 17 months after
the determination of eligibility for reregistration
therefore a target has not been established for FY90.]
Complete L2 Special Review Decisions.
P-l
P-2
P-3
P-4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OPTS - I
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
FY 1990~
Program: Pesticides
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Prevent unreasonable risks from
pesticide active ingredients and
products and encourage use of
safer products.
Complete final decisions on new active ingredients and
applications for registration in a timely manner and
report on the overdue active ingredients and applications.
- New Active Ingredients (New Chemicals/New Biochemicals/
Microbiological Reviews): 1Q
- Old Chemical Applications 1425
- Amended Registration Applications 2625
- New Uses Applications £0
Complete final decision on 325 emergency
exemptions*.
Process £Q final decisions on tolerance petitions
within quarterly targets and report on the backlog of
overdue petitions*.
Regional and Headquarters Measures
- Worker Protection (P-8A)
- Groundwater (P-8B)
- Endangered Species (P-8C)
* These numbers may vary based on the number of petitions
and exemptions received by EPA. OHSE will compare the
number of petitions and exemptions actually processed
each quarter with the number administratively targeted
to be processed.
P-5
P-5A
P-5B
P-5C
P-5D
P-6
P-7
P-8
0 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OPTS - 2
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
FY 1990
Program; Toxic Substances (Headquarter Measures)
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Review all new
chemicals, imposing
controls as
necessary to reduce
risk
Identify potential
risk of suspect
chemicals
Initiate and
promulgate actions
to reduce the risks
from hazardous
existing chemicals
Make the TRI data
base accessible to
facilitate public
access and use
Evaluate quality
of release estimates
provided by indus-
try and identify
areas where
additional guidance
or procedures are
needed
Report on the number of valid new
chemical notices received and actions
taken to reduce risk. Annual estimate
i-s 2790 PMNs received (including
biotech and exemptions) and 170
control actions anticipated.
Report quarterly
under Section 4,
and 8(e).
on reports
5(e), 8(a),
received
8(d),
Complete 8 existing chemicals risk
management actions (includes Section 6
rules, options selection, SNURs, and
Section 9(a) and 9(d) referrals)
Measure cumulative public use of the
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
database (i.e., hours of use). Report
quarterly on number of TRI projects sold
by NTIS/GPO; and number of assistance
at the Title III Reporting Center.
Perform detailed, on-site audits of
randomly selected reporting
facilities to validate reported
figures.
T-l
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-5
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 3,4
OPTS - 3
/on
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
FY 1990
Program: Toxic Substances (Regional Measures)
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Protect public
health and the
environment by pro-
viding assistance
in abating
hazardous asbestos
materials in schools
Identify potential
risks from emissions
by conducting
technical outreach
activities
Encourage State and
local environmental
programs and
increase public
awareness through
outreach
Conduct close-out site evaluations of
all outstanding ASHAA award projects,
particularly any remaining FY1986 and
FY1987 projects, to confirm that abate-
ment assistance was extended on
designated school projects and that
abatement was properly accomplished.
Provide current status reports on
projects where delays are expected
and where abatement has not occurred
as required by the award agreement.
Number of technical assistance or
outreach assistance workshops conducted
Number of outreach assistance workshops
or presentations conducted for or made
to government agencies and the general
public.
T-6
T-7
T-i
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
(cumulative)
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
OPTS - 4
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TO)
FY 1990
Program: Toxic Substances (Regional Measures)
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Protect public health
and the environment
by ensuring, through
the States, that
properly trained and
accredited profes-
sionals are available
to counsel school
officials and other
building managers how
to best control or
eliminate asbestos
hazards in buildings
Protect public health
and the environment
by ensuring the
quality of asbestos
accreditation course,
which train asbestos
management and abate-
ment professionals
for the nation's
schools and other
buildings
Assess State PCB
Program enhancement
progress and
activities
Report on the number of approved State
or Territory Asbestos Accreditation
Programs per discipline. Provide
progress reports on States or Territories
that have established programs in any
of the disciplines.
T-9
Report on the number of audits performed
for full approval of asbestos training
courses previously granted contingent
approval. Provide fourth quarter
exception reports explaining why courses
in the universe were not audited for
full approval. Report on the number of
Refresher courses audited.
Provide report on each State in the
Region describing current State PCB
programs.
T-10
T-ll
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
(cumulative)
Q 2
by Regions
OPTS - 5
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Program Area: Pesticide Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain
high level of
compliance.
Inspections for Significant Activities and Compliance Rate P/E - 1
Specify the cumulative number of State inspections
in the following categories identified on EPA form
5700-33H and the number of EPA inspections (Regions 7 and 8
only) in comparable categories:**
o agricultural use and follow up
o nonagricultural use and follow up
o restricted use pesticide dealers
o specify the cumulative number of State and EPA enforce-
ment actions and/or proceedings in the same categories
(above)
EPA Enforcement Actions
Specify on a cumulative basis:
o numbers of administrative complaints issued
o numbers of warning letters, SSUROs, recalls,
and import detentions
o civil and criminal referrals (retrieved from
OECM Docket)
*A11 Federal data will be reported quarterly in real time.
All State data will be reported quarterly, one quarter out
of phase.
**Requires quarterly targets for inspections.
P/E - 2
Q 1,2,3,4*
Q 1,2,3,4
OPTS - 6
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Program Area: Pesticide Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS CODE .FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Significant Violator - State Primacy (Dynamic Base)*
For referrals under Section 27 designated as significant in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 40 CFR 173 (pro-
cedures governing .referrals), specify on a cumulative basis:
o total number of referrals
o number of referrals pending (timeframe not elapsed)
o number of referrals addressed within timeframe
o number of referrals addressed beyond timeframe.
Significant Violator - EPA (Dynamic Base)*
For significant use cases and suspension/cancellation
actions referred from States to Regions or based on EPA
inspections, report on a cumulative basis:
o total number of cases referred/identified
o number of cases addressed
o number of cases closed
*See "Definitions."
P/E - 3
Q 1,2,3,4
OPTS - 7
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Program Area: Toxic Substances Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS CODF FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Inspections and Compliance Rates
o Specify the cumulative number of EPA and State
inspections conducted*
o Specify the number of inspections for which case
review is completed
o Specify the number of inspections found-in violation
Enforcement Actions
Specify on a cumulative basis:
o number of administrative complaints issued
o number of notices of noncompliance issued
o number of civil and criminal referrals (retrieved
from OECM Docket)
Significant Noncompliance Fixed Base** (Pre-FY 1990
open cases)
Identify the number of significant noncomplier cases
pending** issuance of enforcement action and the
number issued and still open** at the beginning of
FY 1990. Each quarter, report on the status of
this BOY inventory:
o number of pending cases issued
o number of cases closed
* This measure requires quarterly targets.
** See "Definitions."
T/E - 1
T/E - 2
T/E - 3
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OPTS-8
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Program Area: Toxic Substances Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
in Federal
Facilities
Significant Noncompliance - Dynamic Base* (new cases
For FY 1990 SNC cases, resulting from reviews of
FY 1990 inspections, specify on a cumulative basis:
*
o number of SNC cases identified
o number of SNC cases opened:**
in 0 to 180 days of inspection date
in 181 or more days of inspection date
o number of SNC cases closed
Federal Facilities
Specify separate data on Federal Facilities for T/E-1,
T/E-3 and T/E-4, as a subset of totals.
* See "Definitions."
** Regional targets will be required for certain cases under
See "Definitions."
T/E - 4
Q 1,2,3,4
T/E - 5
Q 1,2,3,4
this measure,
OPTS - 9
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Program Area: Toxic Substances Enforcement
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
for PCB
disposal and
storage
Permitted PCB Disposal Facilities and Brokers/Storage
Facilities*
Specify the number of PCB permitted disposal facilities
and PCB broker/storage facilities in the Region
Each quarter report:
o number of inspections (initial and follow-up) conducted
at these facilities**
o number of inspection reviews completed
o number of inspections found in violation
o number of administrative complaints issued
o number of permit suspensions and revocations issued
* See "Definitions."
** Regional targets will be required for this measure
(subset of T/E-1 targets)
T/E - 6
Q 1,2,3,4
OPTS - 10
12/89
-------
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Program Area: Emergency Planning/Community Right-to-Know
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Inspections and Compliance Rates
o Specify the cumulative number of EPA inspections
conducted*
o Specify the number of inspections for which case
review is completed
o Specify the number of inspections found in violation
Enforcement Actions
Specify on a cumulative basis:
o number of administrative complaints issued
o number of civil and criminal referrals (retrieved
from OECM Docket)
Significant Noncompliance Fixed Base** (Pre-FY 1990
open cases)
Identify the number of significant noncomplier cases
pending** issuance of enforcement action and the
number issued and still open** at the beginning of
FY 1990. Each quarter, report on the status of
this BOY inventory:
o number of pending cases issued
o number of cases closed
* This measure requires quarterly targets.
** See "Definitions."
E/E - 1
E/E - 2
E/E - 3
0 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
OPTS - 11
12/89
-------
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Program Area: Emergency Planning/Community Right-to-Know
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Significant Noncompl i ance - Dynamic Base* (new cases)
For FY 1990 SNC cases, resulting from reviews of
FY 1990 inspections, specify on a cumulative basis:
o number of SNC cases identified
o number of SNC cases opened:**
in 0 to 180 days of inspection date
in 181 or more days of inspection date
o number of SNC cases closed
* See "Definitions."
** Regional targets will be required for this measure.
E/E - 4 Q 1,2,3,
OPTS - 12
1 7/HQ
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
Definitions of key terms and detailed quarterly commitments for the Pesticide and Toxic
Substances Programs follow.
P-l Establishment of comprehensive data requirements in data call ins.
t
Comprehensive data requirements will be developed for chemicals:
List A consists of pesticide active ingredients for which Registration Standards have been
issued as of December 24, 1988; and the other three lists (Lists B, C, and D) are to include
all other active ingredients contained in a product first registered before November 1, 1984,
for which Registration Standards have not been issued.
Reregistration of these chemicals will be accomplished in the following phases:
Phase 1: EPA is required to publish lists of pesticide active ingredients subject to
reregistration and to ask registrants of pesticide products containing those active
ingredients whether they intend to seek reregistration.
Phase 2: Registrants inform EPA of intent to seek reregistration, comply with data
requirements and pay first portions of reregistration fee.
Phase 3: Registrants submit required existing studies and pay final reregistration fee.
Phase 4: Independent EPA review of registrant submissions and identification and call in of
any additional data requirements.
Phase 5: EPA conducts reregistration review of each active ingredient and takes appropriate
regulatory action.
OPTS - 13
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
Definition; For List A chemicals, this would be the mail out of a Data Call In (DCI) as a
result of the inventory. For Lists B, C and D, this would be the Phase 4 DCI mailout.
Indicate number of data call ins by quarter:
FY 90
Ql
3
Q2
17
Q3
20
Q4
66
Total
106
P-2
Publication of reregistration eligibility document or "other appropriate regulatory
action".
Definition: For all lists this would be the Phase 5 determination required by Section
4(g)(2)(A) as to whether pesticides containing a given active ingredient are eligible for
reregistration. For chemicals deemed eligible for reregistration, the document would be the
equivalent of a registration standard and would also call in product specific data. For those
B/C/D chemicals, and List A chemicals following the inventory based DCI, which are deemed
ineligible there may be a range of actions from another DCI, to a referral to special review.
Whatever the "non-eligibility" determination is it would be announced in the FR and would be a
completion under this measure.
FY 90 Target
Ql
0
Q2
0
Q3
5
Q4
6
Total
11
OPTS - 14
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
P-3 Product specific reregistration.
Definition: A determination that a pesticide meets the requirements of section 3(c)(5).
FY 90 Target: This step doesn't take place until up to 17 months after the determination of
eligibility for reregistration so a target should not be established for FY90. (Included here
for completeness of understanding of process. This will be a measure in FY 91.)
P-4
Special Review Decisions
Indicate the number of Special Review Decisions to be made by quarter:
FY 90 Target
Ql
2
Q2
4
Q3
3
Q4
4
Total
13
Definition; The nature of Special Review accomplishments keeps expanding due to the types of
problems encountered and the Agency's resolution of them. Major tolerance actions based on
ADI exceedences are the equivalent of Position Documents in terms of the amount of work it
takes to complete them, the nature of the hazard posed and the degree of public health
protection afforded (item #5). Major Federal Register status reports, similar to what is
being prepared for 2,4-D, are also resource intensive and serve much the same purpose as
Position Documents in keeping the public informed of our findings (items #6). Thus, the
definition of Special Review has been expanded to include the above as part of final
resolution decisions.
OPTS - 15
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
Pesticide Special Review Decisions - Special Review decisions include the issuance of the
position documents listed below or the following final resolutions:
1. returning the chemical to the pesticide registration process
a) after deciding not to initiate a Special Review before a Grassley-Allen letter is
issued
b) after deciding not to initiate a Special Review subsequent to the issuance of a
Grassley-Allen letter.
2. voluntary cancellation by the applicant,
3. cancellation or suspension of the Special Review by EPA, or
4. a negotiated settlement on modifications to the terms and conditions of the
registration with the registrant whether the chemical:
a) is in Special Review, or
b) being considered for Special Review
5. A revocation or revision of a tolerance based on public health criteria.
6. A major status report, published in the Federal Register, explaining the Agency's
position on a chemical which is either in Special Review or which is being
considered for Special Review.
OPTS - 16
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
The position documents are:
PD-1: reviews the available scientific data and addresses whether a chemical has met or
exceeded Special Review risk criteria (if a chemical does not exceed the criteria,
it is typically returned to the registration process). A PD-1 is considered
completed when the Federal Register notice has been signed by the AA.
PD-2: promulgates the decision to cancel or suspend the Special Review process after a
PD-1 has been issued.
PD-2/3: analyzes the risks and benefits of the Special Review chemicals and any alternatives
to the various uses of the chemical, identifies feasible regulatory options, and
proposes a decision. A PD-2/3 is considered completed when the Federal Register
notice has been signed by the AA.
PD-4: reflects the Agency's final decision. The PD-4 incorporates comments received on
the PD-2/3 from the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel, the Department of Agriculture
and other public responses, along with appropriate analysis of the comments. The
PD-4 typically calls for continued registration with certain terms and conditions or
'cancellations for some or all uses of the pesticide or pesticides. A PD-4 is A PD-4
is considered completed when the Federal Register notice has been signed by the AA.
OPTS - 17
12/89
-------
PD-5
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
Complete Final Decision on New Active Ingredients and Applications for Registration
and Tolerances. OPP defines the following as "final decisions" for purposes of
measuring performance in the pesticide registration program:
a) withdrawal by applicant
b) denial of registration
c) unconditional registration
d) conditional registration
Provide number of final registration decisions by quarter:
Ql
Q2
Q3
Q4
Total
P-5A New Chemical/New Biochemical/
Microbiological
P-5B Old Chemicals
P-5C Amended Registrations
P-5D New Uses
P-5A Report on the number of final decisions on New Active Ingredients (New Chemical/New
Biochemical/Microbiological) administratively targeted to be completed within the
quarter.
2
340
550
60
3
385
690
20
2
325
660
10
3
375
725
20
10
1425
2625
110
OPTS - 18
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
New Chemicals - Applications for registration of a pesticide active ingredient that is not
currently registered under FIFRA. Final decisions may result in denial, unconditional
registration, conditional registration, or administrative withdrawal.
NOTE: Registration of a food-use chemical, i.e. of a chemical that might leave a residue
on a food or feed item, requires the establishment of a tolerance or exemption from
tolerance.
New Biochemical/Microbiological - Application for registration of new biochemical or microbial
products not currently registered with the Agency, whether for food use or non-food use.
Included under these activities are:
Biochemical (pheromone, insect or plant growth regulators and hormones used as
pesticides).
Microbial (viruses, bacteria, protozoa and fungi — any living organism introduced into
the environment to control the population or biological activities of another life form
that is considered a pest under FIFRA).
Biotechnical products (genetically engineered microbial pesticides, or GEMP). Each
biotechnical product will undergo a risk assessment and risk/benefit analysis.
NOTE: As with other new pesticides, registration of a new food-use biochemical requires
the establishment of a tolerance level or an exemption.
OPTS - 19
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
P-5B Provide number of final decisions on Old Chemical Applications administratively targeted
to be completed within the quarter, and the number actually completed.
Old Chemicals - Applies to applications for registration of new products containing pesticide
active ingredient chemicals and biologicals which have previously been registered. Old
chemical "change" applies to applications in which there is a significant change in formula
or use pattern. "Me too" applications deal with chemicals and biologicals whose formulation
and use patterns are identical or substantially similar to those previously registered.
P-5C Provide number of final decisions on Amended Registration
Applications administratively targeted to be completed within the quarter and the number
actually completed.
Amended Registrations - Changes to an existing registration not including notifications or
significant new uses.
P-5D Provide number of final decisions on New Use Applications administratively targeted to be
completed within the quarter, and the number actually completed.
New Uses - Any major changes involving new uses of old products.
OPTS - 20
12/89
-------
P-6
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
Provide number of final decisions on Emergency Exemptions to be completed by quarter:
x 1st quarter
x 2nd quarter
x 3rd quarter
x 4th quarter
TOTAL
40 Final Decisions
80' Final Decisions
140 Final Decisions
65 Final Decisions
325
Emergency Exemption - An exemption from the normal registration requirements of FIFRA which is
granted by a Federal or State agency if EPA determines that emergency conditions exist, (e.g., a
pest outbreak is identified and no effective pesticide is registered for the particular use).
P-7 Provide number of final decisions on Tolerance Petitions targeted to be processed during
the quarter:
x 1st quarter
x 2nd quarter
x 3rd quarter
x • 4th quarter
TOTAL
10 Final Decisions
15 Final Decisions
15 Final Decisions
20 Final Decisions
60
OPTS - 21
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
FFDCA Tolerance Petition Decision - applies to all requests for tolerance levels and exemptions
from requirement of a tolerance for pesticide residues in or on raw agricultural commodities,
processed foods and minor uses. EPA is required by law to process tolerance petitions in 180
days; however, OPP has set an administrative deadline of 240 days to better reflect increases in
the complexity of submissions.
P-8A WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD
REGIONAL OFFICES
1) Upon publication of the final worker protection rule in Ql, the regional offices will
discuss and explain the rule with state lead agencies and other units holding enforcement
cooperative agreements with State agency.
Goal: All of the states and territories will be informed about the rule within 60 days of
publication (Q2); within 6 months of publication, the cooperative agreements will
have worker protection activities incorporated (Q4).
2) For each cooperative enforcement agreement, the Region will identify the state/organization
roles and responsibilities for implementing the worker protection program. The
agencies/organizations that are responsible for the following activities should be worker
protection activities for all (100%) of their states/territories with cooperative agreements.
OPTS - 22
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD (cont'd)
3) The regions should review the progress/problems associated with the implementing the worker
protection rule and prepare a status report for each cooperative agreement.
Goal: Reports will be due the 3rd and 4th quarters.
HEADQUARTERS
1) Publish the final worker protection rule.
Goal: Publish the final worker protection rule in the 1st quarter FY 1990.
2) Provide regions/state and local officials with training materials on the following
schedule:
Goal: 3rd qtr...l5 brochures
4th qtr... 5 videos and 5 slide shows
P-8B GROUND WATER INITIATIVE
REGIONAL OFFICES
1) Upon publication by Headquarters of the Ground Water State Management Plan Guidance
Document (Q3), the regional office will discuss the advantages of the "state" approach and urge
each state to develop management plans.
OPTS - 23
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
GROUND WATER INITIATIVE (cont'd)
Goals: Discuss the advantages of state management plans with all states/territories within
60 days of publication of the guidance document (Q4), and;
Determine the states/tribes commitment to develop state management plans and a time
frame for doing so;
Goal: Report all (100%) of states/tribes status (Q4).
2) For each affected state/territory/tribe in the region, identify the state agencies' roles
and responsibilities for managing pesticide contamination in ground water. The agencies and
supervisors responsible for the following activities under the state management plan concept
should be identified:
water monitoring activities,
mapping vulnerable areas,
responding to positive findings,
overall state agency coordination, and
- organization/individual that will serve as the primary contact.
Goal:
Have the information for all (100%) of the committed states/territories/tribes (Q4).
3) After the criteria for evaluating state management plans becomes available, the region will
review submitted state plans within 60 days of receipt. SPMS quarterly reports will include the
state, date received and the review completion date and whether the plan was approved.
NOTE: Due to the Headquarters completion date and the complexity of compiling a state
management plan, it is questionable that many states will have a plan ready to submit in FY
'90.
OPTS - 24
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
GROUND WATER INITIATIVE (cont'd)
Goal: Review submitted plans within 60 days from date received.
HEADQUARTERS
1) Publish the final Agriculture Chemicals in Ground Water Strategy document.
Goal: Publish the document by .
2) Publish the final State Ground Water Management Plan Guidance Document.
Goal: Publish the management plan guidance document by the end of Q3.
3) Publish the four criteria documents needed for the state ground water management plans.
Criteria documents will address the following areas:
- approval criteria for pesticide management plans,
monitoring criteria,
response criteria for contaminated water, and
evaluation criteria for Pesticide Management Plans
(PMP's).
Goal: Publish the draft criteria documents for comment by the end of Q2. Publish the
final criteria documents by the end of Q3.
OPTS - 25
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
P-8C ENDANGERED SPECIES
REGIONAL OFFICES
1) For each state that accepts the base funding for endangered species activities, the
regional office will identify:
A) the organization of the states' information response system that has the capability
of:
responding to user requests for county bulletins, and
- provide nationally printed materials on the endangered species program to the
public.
B) the organization and steps the states will take to address any issues (associated
with federally listed endangered species) which arise including:
- habitat conformation or identification,
- review maps of endangered species habitats, and
disseminate information regarding newly identified/listed species.
Goal: 100% of the states accept base funding and have a program in place by the end of Q3.
OPTS - 26
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
ENDANGERED SPECIES (cont'd)
2) For states/territories that are eligible for additional funding, the regional office will
provide assistance to states/territories/tribes to develop a proposed work plan and accompanying
schedule which develops their own state protection plan or outlines plans to participate in the
federal program as a pilot. If applicable, plans should include provisions for the following:
- recommended roles and responsibilities of EPA and the different state departments in
carrying out the Program,
disseminate EPA-developed educational materials for pesticide users as well as public
outreach information,
- review habitat maps to ensure that they provide accurate descriptions of where endangered
species must be protected,
outline the criteria they will use to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the
pilot/program or other funded activities, and
for those states evaluating the economic and/or environmental impacts of their programs,
develop/contribute information on the economics and/or environmental impact of
pilot/proposed programs.
Goals: Provide assistance to all (100%) of the states that wish to participate in state or
federal pilot programs by the end of 2nd quarter.
Provide a status report on the completion of the 5 items listed above for all states
participating in pilot/special program in the 3rd and 4th Quarters.
OPTS - 27
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
continued
ENDANGERED SPECIES (cont'd)
3) For each state/tribal plan or federal pilot that has been finalized, submit a quarterly
report on the progress of the program.
4) Review and comment on all state submitted plans.
Goal: Complete the regional review of state submitted plans within 60 days of receipt in
the Regional Office; report date received and date review was given to the state.
HEADQUARTERS
1) Publish the final Endangered Species Protection Program in the Federal Register.
Goal: Publish in Q3.
2) Produce and disseminate to the regional offices educational materials to include:
Goals: Publish information brochures explaining the Endangered Species program (Q3);
Generic video tape will be used by state Certification and training programs (Q4);
Provide the regions with county specific bulletins necessary for use in the Pilot
programs (Q3).
OPTS - 28
12/89
-------
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)
T-l Review and take action on new chemicals.
This measure reports on the number of new chemical notices received (PMNs, Biotechnology
Notices and Exemptions) and control actions taken on new chemicals which pose a threat to
public health or the environment. If EPA fails to take regulatory action on a new chemical, a
submitter is free to commence manufacture or import; a manufacturer or importer must file an
NOC within 30 days which certifies that manufacture or import has occurred. [There is no
correlation between new chemical submissions, control actions, and NOCs within a fiscal year.]
Action: A.
B.
C.
Report new chemical notices received for Premanufacture Notices (PMNs),
Biotechnology Notices, Low Volume Exemptions, Test Market Exemption
Applications, and Polymer Exemptions (annual target is 2790).
Report control actions taken which include consent or unilateral 5(e)
orders, 5(f) orders and withdrawals in face of §5(e) or 5(f) action
(170 control actions anticipated).
Report the number of NOCs received during FY90.
T-2 Data received under TSCA information gathering provisions
The information gathering capabilities of TSCA sections
used to fill data gaps on chemicals for other agencies,
4, 5(e), 8(a), 8(d) and 8(e)
other EPA offices, and OTS.
are
Action: A.I
B.I
B.2
Count number of reports received under §8(a), 8(d) and 4 by primary user
Count number of reports received under §8(e)
Count number of test studies received under §5(e)
Summary to date of §8(a), 8(d), 8(e) and 5(e)
Summary to date of studies received under §4
No targets are established for this measure
OPTS - 29
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)
T-3 Report on Activities Related to Regulatory Investigations and Risk Management Actions.
This measure will provide reports of actions taken on existing chemicals that are in the
Agency's formal options selection process, are planned for TSCA §6 regulation, are subject
to regulation under §5(a)(2), or are subject to referral to other agencies via §9(a) or 9(d).
Options selection is the formal process that determines the appropriate regulatory mechanism on
chemicals under investigation. TSCA §6 provides EPA with the authority to control a chemical
as a hazardous substance if the Agency finds that there is a reasonable basis for concluding
that the chemical presents or will present an unreasonable risk. Section 5(a)(2) defines
significant new uses for an existing chemical that would be regulation of chemical risks to
other agencies which have adequate statutory authority to regulate the risks; §9(d) requires
EPA to consult and coordinate with other Federal agencies to achieve maximum enforcement of
TSCA.
T-4 Public Access to Section 313 Toxic Release Inventory Data
This measure provides reports of actions taken to meet the statutory mandate to make the
TRI data through both online and "other means." EPA has selected the National Library of
Medicine's Toxnet system as the method to disseminate the data online. In addition, EPA has
decided to produce and market the TRI data via computer tapes, compact disks (CD-ROM),
microfiche, and computer diskettes. The data is also provided to the public via the Title
III Reporting Center. This measure will provide quarterly reports on the status of each
of these efforts. No target is established for this measure.
T-5 Section 313 Toxic Release Inventory Facility Audits
This measure provides a report on audits of facilities that filed Section 313 forms. The
report (which provides summary statistics since individual facility identities are confi-
dential) will cover: accuracy with which facilities applied release estimation methods;
common errors in release reporting; rate of errors in determining whether a chemical must
be reported. "Accuracy" will be projected to national reporting totals. The report will
identify specific areas where the form, instructions, training, or technical guidance can
be improved to reduce future errors. No target is established for this measure.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)
T-6 ASHAA Close-Outs/Status Reports
The universe will consist of all projects awarded ASHAA loan and grant money during
FY1986, 1987, 1988 and 1989 (including BIA projects) that have not been closed-out.
.Close-Out Site Evaluations—Consist of on-site abatement inspections, interviews with LEA
and school officials, and final inspection reports by AARPs. Close-out site evaluations
entered into the official tracking system count against the target. (Note: the fact that
some special condition may not have been met for a given project does not disqualify the
close-out evaluation from counting against the target, as long as the on-site evaluation
is complete and registered properly in Headquarter*s ASHAA tracking system).
.Fourth Quarter Status Reports will contain information on the projects that received
formal extensions (such extensions generally apply only to 1988 and 1989 projects)
through the fourth quarter and are not expected to be completed in 1989. Status reports
will also provide detail on all projects (i.e., 1986-1989) that did not receive extensions
and were not completed during FY1990. Status reports will not count against the target.
However, they will provide justification for the Region not meeting the target.
.Action: Regions will submit close-out inspection reports as soon as completed so that
Headquarters can review and enter the information into the ASHAA tracking system
(quarterly, Headquarters will provide Regions with draft figures for comment).
Regions will provide status reports for fourth quarter as defined above.
T-7 EPCRA-Section 313 Technical Outreach Activities to Industry
.Technical Assistance—Reaching out to the regulated community to inform them of the
EPCRA Section 313 regulations and how to comply with these regulation.
.Outreach Assistance—Reaching out to the general public and the government agencies
(Federal, State, local) to inform them about the EPCRA Section 313 Program, avail-
ability of the TRI data, how to access the data, uses of the data.
.Workshop—A program designed by the Section 313 staff (or contractor) consisting of a
minimum of four hours. Typically this program would receive widespread publicity (via
mailings to potential attendees, announcements in newsletters, trade journals, etc.).
A workshop can be a sub-part of an industry sponsored event.
OPTS - 31
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)
T-8 EPCRA-Section 313 General Outreach Activities
.Presentation—A speech or discussion by EPCRA Section 313 staff to inform the audience
of any aspect of the Section 313 Program. Typically it would be no more than two hours.
It could be to a small group of people (e.g., State staff people, SERC, LEPC, environ-
mental group), or could be a part of a larger program (conference, meeting, etc.). The
logistical effort is minimal compared to a workshop.
T-9 Asbestos Accreditation Programs (Status of State Programs)
The universe will consist of Accreditation Programs for each of five disciplines to be
developed by every State/Territory (100%).
.Fully Approved State/Territory Accreditation Program will refer to the establishment by
the State/Territory of an Accreditation Program for each of five disciplines (inspector/
management planner, contractor, worker, project designer, and refresher). The
establishment of a program for each one of these disciplines counts against the target.
If State A, for example, establishes all five programs, the Region would report five.
If State B, on the other hand, establishes just contractor and worker course, two counts
would be reported.
.Progress Reports for each quarter will be submitted for States/Territories that do not
have programs in any or all of the disciplines. They will include information on what
the Region is doing to assist the State in establishing the accreditation programs.
.Action: Regions will report quarterly on a per-discipline basis, all State/Territory
Accreditation Programs developed. Regions will submit progress reports as
defined above.
OPTS - 32
-------
•» *• .».-»-* V t^f JL f±±\U
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)
T-10 Asbestos Accreditation Programs (Course Audits)
The universe will consist of all courses contingently approved by EPA on the date which
Agency discontinues course reviews. Targets will be set at between 50% and 80% of all
contingently approved courses by the end of the fiscal year.
.Course Audits (for full approval): an on-site audit of a course conducted by a Regional
representative to determine if the course meets the criteria set forth in the EPA Model
Accreditation Plan, and uses instructional materials and personnel indicated in the
course submission. (This definition.applies to Refresher Courses, as well.)
.Development by State or Territory of Asbestos Accreditation Program in a Particular
Discipline will permit Regions to delegate to the State or Territory the responsibility
of auditing asbestos courses, contingently approved by EPA, for full approval within that
discipline. Thus, whenever a State or Territory establishes its accreditation program in
a particular discipline, the Region may count all courses associated with that discipline
in that State toward the target.
.Fourth Quarter Exception Reports will be provided to Headquarters explaining why courses
in the universe were not audited for full approval.
.Action: The Regions will report on the number of audits of courses in the universe, based
upon targets. The Regions will also submit fourth quarter reports, as defined
above.
T-ll PCBs Enhancement Activities
The PCB report describing each State in the Regions current PCB State enhancement program
should include the following:
.Provide a list and supporting documentation for States which currently regulate PCBs under
RCRA.
.Provide a list of States that have PCB regulations in place and copies of the regulations.
.Provide any written State PCB policy.
.Provide any agreements that the Regions may have with your States (i.e., Region V has an
agreement with Ohio concerning inspections).
.List any activities in the States (i.e., any inspections, clean-up, etc.).
OPTS - 33
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(PESTICIDES ENFORCEMENT)
PESTICIDES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS
A "Significant Violator" is
in 40 CFR 173 (interpretive
areas will consist of those
health or the environment.
priority areas agreed to by
"significant" violations to
any violation which meets the criteria for significant cases set forth
rule governing FIFRA Section 26 and 27 referrals). In general, priority
state pesticide activities which present greatest potential for harm to
EPA will determine, on a case-by-case basis, which allegations in the
EPA and the State in the cooperative agreement involve sufficiently
be formally referred to the State and tracked.
"Addressed," with reference to State action, is defined in accordance with the Final Interpretive
Rule and includes "referral of the case to a pesticide control board or State's
attorney for action."
"Timeframe," with reference to State action, is the timeframe negotiated between the Region and each
State for completion of investigation plus the timeframe agreed upon by the Region and each State
for initiation of prosecution.
An "appropriate State Enforcement action" is an action which meets the criteria in 40 CFR 173. In
general, the severity of the proposed enforcement action must correlate with the gravity of the
violation. Specifically, each state cooperative agreement will identify "appropriate" action
relative to the remedies available to the state.
An "appropriate Federal Enforcement action" for a "Significant violator" is one of the following:
o Administrative Complaint
o Civil Judicial Action for penalty collection
o Criminal Action
o Compliance Agreement in the case of a Federal facility
OPTS - 34
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT)
TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS
Formal Enforcement Action - Noncompliance is addressed by an administrative complaint or by a civil
or criminal judicial action. All SNCs must be addressed by a formal enforcement action—at minimum
an administrative complaint.
Minor Enforcement Action - Noncompliance is addressed by a Notice of Noncompliance.
Significant Noncompliance (SNC) - TSCA Significant Noncompliance (SNC) is a violation of one of the
following regulations under TSCA:
o PCB regulations
o Title II (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act)
o Asbestos Worker Protection
o Section 4 testing requirements
o Section 5 premanufacture notice requirements
o Section 8 reporting/recordkeeping requirements
o Section 13 import certifications
o All Federal Facility cases
for which the level of enforcement action is, at minimum, an administrative complaint in accordance
with the appropriate Enforcement Response Policy (ERP), and for which the penalty is, at minimum,
$25,000.
The SNC determination is made prior to calculating penalty adjustment factors such as voluntary
disclosure, culpability, etc. In matters involving multiple violations, the case will be considered
SNC if the total penalty is $25,000 or more.
Note: For Federal facilities, SNC is a facility where the violation(s), as defined above, would
normally result in a formal enforcement action. These actions, however, are handled in accordance
with the EPA Federal Facility Compliance Strategy.
Note: Target for issuing cases under T/E-4 applies only to PCB violations, AHERA violations based
on inspections, and Worker Protection violations.
OPTS - 35
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT)
TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS (continued)
An administrative civil complaint is issued for SNC violations where a violation: presents a real
(but not an extreme or imminent) risk to human health or environment; is likely to be an isolated
occurrence; and is apparently the result of ordinary negligence, inadvertence, or mistake. In those
cases involving extreme or imminent risk to human health or the environment, the Regions may
initiate judicial action (e.g., injunctions, seizures, civil and criminal actions). In these
instances, the case is referred to OECM and monitored using the OECM Docket System.
SNC Fixed J3as_e _ (jpre-FJT _199Q).. - Refers to reducing the number of pre-FY 1990 SNC cases on the
Beginning-of-Year (BOY) inventory. Each quarter, Regions report the status on the number of pending
cases for which enforcement actions are issued (opened), and the number qf open cases closed.
BOY _lnv.entpry - Consists of all SNC cases, including Federal Facility actions, as follows:
"pending" - violations detected in inspections conducted prior to FY 1990 for which enforcement
actions were notissued as of 10-01-89, and "open" - cases issued prior to FY 1990 and not closed as
of 10-01-89. The BOY inventory should not change in FY 1990.
SNC Dynamic Base (FY 1990 Cases) - Refers to taking action against newly identified FY 1990 SNC
cases based on FY 1990 inspections. Regions report each quarter on the number of cases issued and
closed.
Target for Dynamic Base - Target is to issue 75% of enforcement actions within 180 days of
inspection for PCB, AHERA and Worker Protection violations. Excluded from the target are: AHERA
violations for failure to submit plans not based on inspections, violations of TSCA Sections 4, 5, 8
and 13.
Pending - Violations for which enforcement action has not been issued.
Open - Cases for which an administrative complaint has been issued, but the case has not been
closed.
Closed - The case is either withdrawn or a consent agreement and order has been issued.
Note: For a Federal facility, the case will be considered closed when EPA receives a letter from the
facility verifying compliance or when a compliance agreement with an acceptable schedule for
returning facility to compliance is signed.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT)
TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS (continued)
Federal Facilities Compliance Agreements - are equivalent to "formal enforcement actions." The term
compliance agreement refers to the mechanism under Executive Order 12088 for solving compliance
problems between EPA and other Federal agencies. A Compliance Agreement must specify the corrective
action to be taken, the schedule for achieving compliance, and the requirements for reporting
progress.
Permitted PCS Disposal Facilities Agreements - are landfills, incinerators, high efficiency boilers,
R&D, alternative methods including mobile uni^ts , and natural gas pipelines with alternative
technology permits. Includes all Headquarter's and regional permitted facilities.
Brokers/storers - refers to PCB brokers, commercial storage facilities and intermediate handling
facilities.
Initial inspection - is the first inspection of a facility in the current fiscal year.
Follow-up inspection - any and all inspections of a facility after the initial inspection, in a
single fiscal year.
See May 1988 PCB Compliance Strategy for inspection requirements.
OPTS - 37
12/89
-------
DEFINITIONS
FY 1990 STARS
OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(EPCRA ENFORCEMENT)
EMERGENCY PLANNING/COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW (EPCRA) ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS
Formal Enforcement Action - Noncompliance is addressed by an administrative complaint or by a civil
or criminal judicial action. All SNCs must be addressed by a formal enforcement action—at minimum
an administrative complaint.
Significant Noncompliance (SNC) - EPCRA Significant Noncompliance (SNC) is a violation of the EPCRA
regulationsfor non reporting/failure to report a chemical, or falsified report, for which the level
of enforcement action is, at minimum, an administrative complaint, in accordance with the EPCRA
Enforcement Response Policy (ERP).
SNC Fixed Base (Pre-FY 1990) - Refers to reducing the number of pre-FY 1990 SNC cases on the
Beginning-of-Year (BOY) inventory. Each quarter, Regions report the status on the number of pending
cases for which enforcement actions are issued, and the number of open cases closed.
BOY Inventory - Consists of all SNC cases, as follows: "pending" - violations detected in
inspections conducted prior to FY 1990 for which enforcement actions were not issued as of 10-01-89,
and "open" - cases issued prior to FY 1990 and not closed as of 10-01-89. The BOY inventory should
not change in FY 1990.
SNC Dynamic Base (FY 1990 Cases) - Refers to taking action against newly identified FY 1990 SNC
cases based on FY 1990 inspections. Regions report each quarter on the number of cases issued and
closed. Target is to issue 75% of enforcement actions within 180 days of inspection.
Pending - Violations for which enforcement action has not been issued.
Open - Cases for which an administrative complaint has been issued, but the case has not been
closed.
C1osed - The case is either withdrawn or a consent agreement and order have been issued.
-------
OPTS
ASHAA CLOSEOUT SITE EVAL—PROJ RECVNG
FUNDING IN FY 86.87.88.89 (T-6a)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target*
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
178
19
24
82
123
82
43
52
26
27
656
*NOTE: At time of publication of GOCMS,, there were target discrepancies remaining. OPTS is
working with the Regions and expects that all targets for this measure may change. OPTS
is currently working with the Regions to be sure target change requests are completed
before the April 30, 1990, deadline.
OPTS - 39
12/89
-------
OPTS 11
ASBESTOS REFRESHER COURSE
(T-9f)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
28
27*
18
17
17
5
9
18
1
144
*NOTE: At time of publication of GOCMs, a target discrepancy remained in Region III.
working with Region III to resolve.
OPTS is
OPTS - 40
12/89
-------
OPTS 13 COURSE AUDITS' COMPLETED FOR FULL
APPRVL/GRANTED CONTING APPRVL T-lOa
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target *
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
44
63
44
32
30
2
17
25
2
276
*NOTE: At time of publication of GOCMS,, there were target discrepancies remaining. OPTS is
working with the Regions and expects that all targets for this measure may change. OPTS
is currently working with the Regions to be sure target change requests are completed
before the April 30, 1990, deadline.
OPTS - 41
12/89
-------
OPTS 17 FIFRA INSPECTIONS SA"S/COMPL RATES
—STATE ENF INSPECT'S — ALL USES
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
111
215
198
730
678
468
142
292
350
61
3245
274
425
396
1,460
1,356
947
296
475
750
133
6512
525
700
648
2.190
2,034
1,683
533
876
1,150
299
10.638
730
1,050
890
2,930
2.710
2,377
867
1.379
1,550
500
14,983
OPTS - 42
12/89
-------
OPTS 18 FIFRA INSPECT'S SA"S/COMPL RATES
—EPA ENF INSPECTIONS—ALL USES REG 7/8
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
25
0
0
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
63
50
0
0
113
0
0
0
0
0
0
141
100
0
0
241
0
0
0
0
0
0
187
155
0
0
342
NOTE:
Only Regions VII and VIII have targets for this measure.
OPTS - 43
12/89
-------
OPTS 42 TSCA (EPA) insp's conducted
(T/E-la)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
HOs
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
58
23
29
81
21
15
19
27
20
13
323
39
107
60
78
166
76
49
38
64
42
33
752
61
167
115
136
281
133
83
57
106
73
56
1268
83
227
149
167
378
183
117
79
140
113
70
1706
OPTS - 44
12/89
-------
PAGE 12
OPTS 45 TSCA (State) inspections
conducted
(T/E-ld)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target -
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
20
50
15
105
36
70
23
40
18
451
153
40
100
30
233
94
141
51
95
38
975
232
60
150
45
399
187
218
79
155
55
1580
314
85
220
60
565
282
295
117
196
90
2224
OPTS -45
12/89
-------
OPTS 66 PCB Permitted Facilities—No.
Insp's—initial
(T/E-6a)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
3
3
8
0
1
0
20
0
6
0
2
3
6
10
0
2
1
30
1
10
0
4
6
9
10
1
3
1
45
1
20
2
5
10
13
10
2
3
2
68
OPTS - 46
12/89
-------
OPTS 72 Broker/Storage Facilities —
Inspections
(T/E-6g)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
8
1
2
0
17
3
0
7
8
0
2
16
2
4
2
44
4
0
11
13
10
4
28
3
6
4
83
7
0
15
15
10
6
40
5
6
9
113
OPTS - 47
12/89
-------
OPTS 77
EPCRA—Number of EPA
Inspections Conducted
fE/E-la)
Region
Universe
Quarter
Target
Quarter 2
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 3
Cumulative
Target
Quarter 4
Cumulative
Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
32
15
10
26
12
10
9
20
8
152
15
57
35
30
50
26
23
18
40
18
312
35
72
60
55
85
40
38
28
60
30
503
50
87
76
65
119
50
51
42
82
47
669
OPTS - 48
12/89
-------
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM
As of January 1990, the following OPTS projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE:
DUE DATE
OPTS 23 WORKER PROTECTION STANDARDS 4/ 3/90
OPTS 77 RESTRICTED USE CLASS./GW CONTAMINATING PESTICIDES 4/23/91
OPTS 80 RULEMAKING CONCERNING CERTAIN MICROBIAL PRODUCTS 9/22/89
OPTS 92 STORAGE, DISPOSAL, TRANSPORT. & RECALL OF PEST. 12/ 1/91
OPTS 95 REVISE PESTICIDE APPLICATORS CERTIFICATION REGS 4/28/91
OPTS 100 SARA SECTION 313 PEAK RELEASE RULE 3/13/91
OPTS 101 DIOXINS/FURANS IN PAPER PRODUCTS 5/18/92
OPTS 102 AHERA EVALUATION 2/28/91
OPTS 103 CFCs SUBSTITUTE STRATEGY 4/30/90
OPTS 104 EUP AMENDMENT FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY 4/30/90
OPTS - 49
12/89
-------
Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring
FY 1990GOCMS
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Report on status of consent
decree compliance to ensure
follow through on EPA
enforcement actions.
Complete HQ review of
proposed Consent Decrees
within an average timeframe.
CONSENT DECREE TRACKING
Report on the compliance status of EPA consent
decrees by Region and statute each quarter.
Regional reports include the names and numbers of:
a. Active consent decrees
b. Active consent decrees in compliance
c. Active consent decrees in violation where
formal enforcement action has commenced
d. Active consent decrees in violation where
formal enforcement action is planned but has
not commenced
e. Active consent decrees in violation with no
formal enforcement action planned or necessary
at this time
PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE REVIEW TIME
Report quarterly on the average review time by HQ
for proposed consent decrees (by Statute) (target
= 35 days). OECM reports on the:
Number of consent decrees reviewed by OECM and
forwarded to DOJ
Number of consent decrees reviewed by OECM and
declined or returned to the Regions
Average review time in days
Range of time needed to review consent decrees
(minimum and maximum)
E/C-1
E/C-2
Q
1,2,3,4
Q
1,2,3,4
OECM - 1
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide support to program
offices and Regions in
developing new referrals of
high quality-
Provide support to program
offices, Regions, and the
Department of Justice in
bringing high quality cases
to a timely conclusion.
CIVIL
REFERRAL ACTIVITY AND STRATEGIC VALUE OF CASES
Report quarterly on the cumulative number of EPA
civil actions. Report the total of all programs
for the following:
New referrals to HQ from Regions (cumulative)
New direct referrals to DOJ from Regions
(including re-referred PRN's) (cumulative)
New pre-referral negotiations cases initiated
(cumulative)
Consent decree enforcement cases (cumulative)
FOLLOW-THROUGH ON ACTIVE CASE DOCKET
Pre-FY 1990 Universe
Specify the number of civil cases pending at the
Department of Justice or filed in the Courts at
the beginning of the fiscal year (including direct
referrals). Each quarter, report current status
of cases by statute:
Cases concluded after filing
Cases concluded before filing
Cases filed in court
Cases pending at the Department of Justice or
at the U.S. Attorney
Cases returned to Regions
Cases on-going for more than two years since
filing
E/C-3
E/C-4
Q
1,2,3,4
0-
1,2,3,4
OECM - 2
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide support to program
offices, Regions, and the
Department of Justice in
bringing high quality cases
to a timely conclusion.
Provide support to program
offices, NEIC/Office of
Criminal Investigations, and
the Regions in developing
new referrals of high
quality.
New FY 1990 Referrals
Specify the number of new civil cases referred to
the Department of Justice since the beginning of
the fiscal year (including direct referrals and
re-referred PRNs). Each quarter, report cumula-
tively by statute:
Cases concluded after filing
Cases concluded before filing
Cases filed in court
Cases pending at the Department of Justice or
at the U.S. Attorney
Cases returned to Regions
CRIMINAL
REFERRAL ACTIVITY AND STRATEGIC VALUE OF CASES
Report cumulatively by principal statute on the
status of EPA criminal actions. Report will
include the following (see definitions):
Number of new investigations opened
Number of open investigations as of end of
quarter
Number of investigations closed prior to
referral to OCE
Cumulative number of new referrals to OCE
Cumulative number of new referrals to DOJ from
OECM-
Cumulative number of cases returned withdrawn,
declined, or recommended for civil or adminis-
trative action, by HQ
Date the SAIC signs the referral
"Date the AA for OECM signs the referral
E/C-5
E/C-6
Q
1,2,3,4
Q
1,2,3,4
OECM - 3
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide support to program
offices, Regions,
NEIC/Office of Criminal
Investigations, and the
Department of Justice in
bringing high quality cases
to a timely and successful
conclusion.
FOLLOW-THROUGH ON ACTIVE CASE DOCKET
Fixed Universe
Specify the number of criminal referrals in
progress at DOJ at the beginning of the fiscal
year. Each quarter, report the current status of
cases by principal statute.
Number of referrals to DOJ by OECM
Number of referrals under review at DOJ
Number of referrals under a grand jury
investigation
Number of referrals in which charges have been
filed
Cumulative number of referrals closed
following prosecution
Cumulative number of
without prosecution
referrals closed by DOJ
Dynamic Universe
Specify the number of new criminal referrals at
DOJ since the beginning of the fiscal year.
Report cumulatively by principal statute:
Cumulative number of referrals to DOJ by OECM
Number of referrals under review at DOJ
Number of referrals under a grand jury
investigation
Number of referrals in which charges have been
filed
of referrals closed
Cumulative number
following prosecution
Cumulative number of
without prosecution
referrals closed by DOJ
E/C-7
E/C-8
Q
1,2,3,4
Q
1,2,3,4
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide information on the
timely disposition of cases.
Provide support to Program
Offices, Regions, and the
Department of Justice in
getting quality settlements
with deterrant impact.
AVERAGE TIME
CIVIL
Report the average time from initiation to
disposition of cases concluded (with a consent
decree or litigation) in FY 1990.
CRIMINAL
Report the total number of referrals during the
fiscal year:
Average time from opening of criminal investi-
gation to referral to OCE
Average time from referral to DOJ (the date
first defendant's indictment or information)
until charges filed
CONCLUSION OF CASES
SUPERFUND
Of the Superfund cases concluded since the
beginning of the year, report the total number of
106 and 107 case conclusions and joint 106 and 107
case conclusions.
E/C-9
E/C-10
E/C-11
Q4
Q4
Q4
OECM - 5
12/89
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide support to Program
Offices, Regions, and the
Department of Justice in
getting quality settlements
with deterrant impact.
CIVIL
Of the number of non-superfund cases concluded
after referral to the Department of Justice since
the beginning of the year (fixed and dynamic
universe) report cumulative total:
Number of cases concluded without penalty
Number of cases concluded with penalty
Total penalties assessed
CRIMINAL
Of the number of criminal dispositions since the
beginning of the year (fixed and dynamic
universe), report the cumulative total by princi-
pal statute:
Number of referrals resulting in a conviction
(plea and verdict)
Number of referrals in which all charges were
dismissed or all defendants were acquitted
Number of defendants charged
Number of defendants convicted
Number of defendants acquitted or dismissed
Number of defendants sentenced
Amount of fines assessed (before suspension)
Months of incarceration ordered
E/C-12
E/C-13
Q4
Q4
OECM - 6
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
E/C-1 Report on the compliance status of EPA consent decrees each quarter.* Include name and number of:
a. Active consent decrees
b. Active consent decrees in compliance
c. Active consent decrees in violation where formal enforcement action has commenced
d. Active consent decrees in violation where formal enforcement action is planned but has not yet
commenced
e. Active consent decrees in violation with no action planned at this time
DEFINITIONS:
Reportable Violation
A decree will be reported as in violation if any term or condition of the decree is not complied
with. De Minimis violations are factored out by the timing of the reporting, since violations should
be addressed within a quarter.
Appropriate Enforcement Action
Formal enforcement actions include motions for contempt, motions to enforce the order, motions for
specific performance, collection of penalties, decree modifications and contractor listing. These
actions will be counted in the enforcement action commenced category when they are referred by the
Regions to Headquarters or directly to the Department of Justice, in accordance with OECM referral
procedures. Less formal actions such as demand letters, formal warning letters, etc., are not
included in the list of appropriate action. A pending violation means no action had been taken or
that the violation is in the first stages of being addressed (e.g., the source was sent a demand
letter).
* Show number of consecutive quarters consent decrees have been listed in each category.
OECM - 7
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
Final Compliance Determinations
In cases where the final compliance date in the decree has been reached and the source is not meeting
the final compliance limits or conditions of the decree, the decree shall be reported in category (c),
(d) or (e) of E/C-1, depending on the circumstances. If the Regional Office has determined that the
source will be unable to meet the final terms of the decree, and enforcement action is planned, the Region
will continue to report the decree in category (d) until one of the acceptable enforcement actions
previously defined has been commenced. At that time, the decree will be reported as in violation with
enforcement action commenced until it is returned to compliance with the decree. If the Region has
determined that the final terms of the decree will be met, the Region will report the violation in
category (e) as in violation with no action planned at this time. When the final terms of the decree
are met, the decree will be reported in the compliance category.
Multiple Facilities
Action taken to address violations at more than one facility covered by the same decree will only be
reported and counted as one decree. The Regional actions against multiple facilities covered by the same
decree will be accounted for in the significant noncomplier lists and the enforcement actions tracked
in the FY 1988 SPMS.
E/C-2 Pre-Referral Negotiation (PRN) Cases - Pre-referral negotiation cases are ones in which settlement
negotiations are begun prior to the referral of a formal litigation report to DOJ and the filing
of a complaint.
1. A PRN case is counted as "initiated" when a pre-referral/mini litigation report is submitted
to DOJ.
2. A PRN case is counted as a new "civil referral" when either a final draft consent decree or a
full litigation report is referred to DOJ.
3. A new PRN case, "initiated" during the fiscal year, may later be counted as a civil referral
per #2 above. It will not count, however, in both.
OECM - 8
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
E/C-6 Report on criminal referral activity and the strategic value of cases:
Open Investigations
The agent determines that evidence may exist that shows the violation of an environmental statute
or regulation. A preliminary investigation results in the opening of a case. A project number is
requested from OCI and all investigatory activities are charged to that number. An OCI docket number
is assigned and a case form is submitted for entering the investigation in the EPA Criminal Docket.
Subsequent activities are charged against the project number and described in the EPA Criminal
Docket.
Investigations Closed Prior to Referral to EPA-OCE
Investigation has shown: that the allegations were unfounded, the case should be referred for
administrative civil action, the case should be referred to another agency or law enforcement office,
or there is lack of prosecutorial merit. Includes cases in which the investigation is suspended
and the information in the closed is retained for intellegence purposes.
E/C-7 Report on follow-through on active criminal case docket
C— Q
O
Fixed Universe
All criminal cases at DOJ/USA or filed in court at the beginning of the fiscal year (1990) are
included in fixed universe. Cases do not enter or exit the fixed universe after October l, 1989.
The purpose is to measure the federal government's progress in moving cases through DOJ and the court
system to conclusion (i.e. , closed following prosecution and closed without prosecution) by taking
a snapshot of the fixed universe at the beginning of year and at the end of each quarter. Progress
in getting this years' number of BOY fixed based cases through DOJ and the courts this year will
be compared to the same information collected in FY 1989 to identify bottlenecks in the DOJ/judicial
process.
OECM - 9
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
SPMS DEFINITIONS
Dynamic Universe
All cases referred to DOJ after the beginning of the fiscal year (October 1, 1989) are included in
the dynamic universe. The measure reports at the end of each quarter the cumulative number of new
cases referred to DOJ (i.e., the dynamic universe to date) and the status of these cases in the
DOJ/judicial process. Progress in moving new cases through DOJ and the court system will be compared
to the same information collected in FY 1989.
The Fixed and Dynamic Universe measures (E/C-7 and C-8) tracks the movement of the cases through
the key stages of the criminal enforcement system by placing fixed points of measurement on a
continuously revolving system, i.e., on any given day new cases are opened and other cases are
closed. The E/C-13 measure reports the end results of our FY 1990 enforcement efforts by indicating
the total number of cases closed, defendants charged, convicted, acquitted or dismissed during the
year (a combined total of fixed and dynamic).
OECM - 10
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FY 1990
Program; Federal Activities
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Federal Facilities
Compliance Program
Achieve and maintain high
rates of compliance at
Federal facilities through
the A-106 pollution
abatement planning process.
Achieve and maintain a high
rate of compliance of
Federal facilities through a
comprehensive inspection and
enforcement program.
Report total number of inadequate and additional
needed A-106 projects for each media program by
compliance class category (i.e., class I, II, or
III) .
Report the total number of valid inadequate and
additional needed projects (by compliance status
category) which have been satisfactorily addressed
by affected Federal agencies through adequate
A-106 projects in their final A-106 plan
submissions or other acceptable means.
Report the names of those facilities which either
failed to respond or provide an unacceptable
response to projects identified as inadequate or
needed by EPA.
For each media program, report:
a. the number and names of Federal facilities
inspected during the quarter, with dates of
inspections;
b. violation status of each inspected facility;
and
c. date and type of enforcement action (with
quarterly updates).
(There are no targets for the Office of Federal
Activities in FY 1990.)
OFA/E-1
OFA/E-2
OFA/E-3
OFA/E-4
01,2,3,4
B y
Region
Ql,2,3,4
By
Region
Q4
By
Region
Ql,2,3,4
By
Region
by media
OECM - 11
12/89
-------
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIAN.CE MONITORING
FY 1990
Program: Federal Activities
SPMS DEFINITIONS
Satisfactorily address:
Problem may be addressed through the A-106 process, thus:
the facility has proposed an A-106 project which is adequate to correct the identified problem; or
Potential ocmpliance problem may be addressed through other means, thus:
problem has been corrected and facility already returned to physical compliance; or
the facility is correcting the identified problem through the use of existing funds of some means
other than the A-106 process.
If the potential compliance problem identified during the first quarter is not actually present in the
facility at this time, the reported SPMS number for first quarter will be adjusted to show that the problem
does not exist.
Adequate A-106 projects; Federal agency pollution abatement project which has been submitted to EPA
Regional Office for review and determined by EPA to be adequate in terms of engineering, cost and timeliness
to prevent or correct compliance problems.
Violation rate: Report the names of those Federal facilities which have been inspected by EPA or States
or have self-reported violations, and whether they have subsequently received a written EPA or State formal
enforcement action (e.g., a consent order or compliance agreement) or an informal enforcement response
(e.g., a warning letter or notice of violation (NOV)).
OECM-12
12/89
-------
ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM
As of January 1990, the following OECM projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE:
DUE DATE
OECM 50 ANNUAL ENFORCEMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS REPORT 2/19/90
OECM 51 REVISED RCRA CIVIL PENALTY POLICY 2/23/90
OECM 52 MANUAL ON MONITORING ENFORMEMENT DECREES AND ORDERS 1/15/90
OECM 53 CONSOLIDATED NON-APA ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY RULES 9/ 4/90
OECM-13
-------
Office of General Counsel
FY 1990GOCMS
-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
FY 1990
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Identify unresolved legal
barriers associated with
State authorization
applications and propose
options for their
resolution.
Assist program offices in
developing regulations by
ensuring final Red Border
review is accomplished in a
timely manner.
State Delegation Agreement Review
Within 15 days of receipt of a memo from the
Regional Administrator recommending a final Agency
decision on a RCRA State authorization
application, OGC is to:
Notify the submitting Agency office of OGC
concurrence/non-concurrence, or
Negotiate an extention for review with
submitting Agency office if evaluation of
deficiencies in the package require
corrections.
- Report progress in meeting extended deadline.
Red Border Review
OGC will complete its response to Red Border
Review documents within three weeks for at least
80% of the reviews and within a maximum of four
weeks for all reviews.
- Indicate total number of Red Border Review
documents received for concurrence by OGC.
By media, indicate number and percent of Red
Border Review documents reviewed in three
weeks and reviewed in four weeks.
Indicate number of Red Border Review documents
not reviewed in four weeks with explanation.
Indicate total number of Red Border Review
documents not receiving OGC concurrence with
explanation.
GC-1
GC-2
Q
1,2,3,4
Q
1,2,3,4
OGC - 1
12/89
*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1990—719-978/06270
------- |