OCLC24225633
               United States            Office of             December 1989
               Environmental Protection        The Administrator
               Agency              Washington DC 20460



£EPA          Strategic Targeted Activities for Results System
               FY  1990 Goals, Objectives,
               Commitments, and Measures

-------
                                  INTRODUCTION


This document  identifies the measures and commitments (targets)  contained in
the Strategic  Targeted Activities for Results System (STARS).   These measures
define the type  of activity and identify targets that have been established
for these measures.   The Headquarters Program Offices and the  respective
Regional.Offices have negotiated to established  targets  for those measures
with targets.  In a few instances (noted by asterisks) the target has not been
resolved between the Headquarters Program Office and the respective Regional
Office.  In many cases,  definitions have been provided which clarify measures.
The Accountability Systems Branch of the Office  of Management  Systems and
Evaluation compiles a quarterly report of actual accomplishments.
                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                       GLNPO Library Collection (PL-12J)
                       77 West Jackson Boulevard,
                       Chicago, IL 60604-3590

-------
                       UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                     STRATEGIC  TARGETED ACTIVITIES  FOR RESULTS  SYSTEM

                   FY  1990 GOALS,  OBJECTIVES,  COMMITMENTS,  AND  MEASURES



                                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
OFFICE

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
PAGE
     MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS	   OAR  -   1
     TARGETS                   	   OAR  -  23
     ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM    	   OAR  -  67

OFFICE OF WATER

     MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS	   OW -  1
     TARGETS                   	   OW - 47
     ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM    	   OW - 91

OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

     MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS  	   OSWER  -   1
     TARGETS                   	   OSWER  - 32
     ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM    	   OSWER  - 58

OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

     MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS	   OPTS - 1
     TARGETS                   	   OPTS - 10
     ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM    	   OPTS - 20

-------
OFFICE

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
     MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS
     ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

     MEASURES AND DEFINITIONS
PAGE
OECM
OECM
OGC -
 1
13

-------
Office of Air and Radiation
FY 1990 GOCMs

-------
          OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                       MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Maintain continued progress
toward attainment of NAAQS.

Implement   the   ozone/CD
policy toward attainment of
the NAAQS.
Report  nonattainment areas on  a pollutant-by-pollutant
basis and identify classification changes.

Report  on  status of SIP revisions  for those areas that
received  SIP  calls  in  June,  1988.    (This  measure
includes the activities that the States were to complete
within  12  months from the receipt of  the  workplan but
did not complete in FY 1989.)
For each area, report:

u.  number of remaining  deficient regulations,  missing
    regulations, other identified SIP deficiencies
a.  number of final  State submittals received by Region
    for:
    - corrected deficient regulations against target
    - missing regulations against target
    - other corrected SIP deficiencies against target
b.  status  report on updating emissions inventory to
    1987 or 1988 base year.
 A-l
 A-2
04
By Region
                                                                                                             Ql Only

                                                                                                             Ql,2,3,4
                                                                                                             By Region
                                                                                                             Ql,2,3,4
                                                                                                             By Region
                                                                                                            OAR-1
                                                                                                            12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
                     OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                               FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards/Office of Mobile Sources

                                   MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Implement   the   ozone/CO
policy toward attainment of
NAAQS (continued).
            Report on status of  adequate SIPs for each ozone and CO
            SIP call area.

                          OZONE/CO SPREADSHEET ITEMS*
            a.  Governor's  commitment  received  to submit  a  SIP,
                against targets.
            b.  Draft of  emission control requirements submitted
                (% reduction).
            c.  Draft measures submitted.
            d.  Draft  demonstration  plan  submitted   to  Regional
                office.
            e.  Public hearings scheduled, against targets.
            f.  Final plan adopted by State Board or Legislature.
            g.  Final  plan  submitted  to Regional  office  against
                targets.
            h.  SIP enters HQ review.
            i.  Final SIP published in Federal Register.
            *QAR will  not report  on these  spreadsheet items until
            the post-87 ozone policy is final.

            Report   on   implementation   of  State/Local   Vehicle
            Inspection Programs:
            ul. Number of programs as of 10/1/89.
            u2. Number  of   programs  implemented   since  10/1/89,
                against targets.

            Report  on  audits  of  State/Local  Vehicle  Inspection
            Programs.  Report number of programs:
            a.  Audited since 10/1/89, against targets.
            b.  Operating at an acceptable level.
            c.  With problems  identified  but not being  adequately
                addressed.
            d.  With corrections underway.
            e.  Programs never evaluated.
 A-2
                                                                                                 A-3
                                                                                                 A-4
01,2,3,4
By SIP
call area
             Q2,  Q4
             By Region
             Q2,Q4
             By Region
                                                                                                             OAR-2
                                                                                                             12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
            FY 1990
of Air Quality Planning and Standards

               MEASURE
SIMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Implement the ozone/CD
policy toward attainment of
NAAQS (continued) .






















Report for all areas with ozone measurements greater
than the level of the NAAQS the design value for the
most recent 3-year period for ozone and 2-year period
for GO for which data are available.
Report for VOC sources in nonattainment areas:
u. Number of Class A VOC SIP sources and VOC NSPS
sources.
a. Number of sources in violation, meeting schedules,
unknown, at end of quarter.
b. Number of inspections of flagged VOC sources,
against quarterly targets. (Data are lagged one
quarter.)
c. Status of VOC significant violators. (Status of
Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure A/E-24) :
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 120 days.
- Number addressed within 270 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
- Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.
A-5



A/E-7




















04
By Area



Ql,2,3,4

Ql,2,3,4

Ql,2,3,4
By Region

Ql,2,3,4
By Region











                                                                                                  OAR-3
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                  FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                      MEASURE
SEMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Continue   progress  toward
completion     and
implementation  of SIPs for
Group I areas and for Group
II and  III areas that have
measured violations of the
PM10   NAAQS.      Continue
progress toward completion
and  implementation  of  an
adequate   PM^g   ambient
network.
                         Report  on the submission of  adequate SIPs for Group  I
                         areas:
                                    GROUP  I  PM1(? SIP SPREADSHEET ITEMS
                         u.  Number of Group I areas at 10/1/89.
                         a.  Control  strategy demonstration completed, against
                             targets.
                         b.  Public hearings held.
                         c.  SIP enters HQ review against targets.
                         d.  Final SIP published in Federal Register.

                         Report  on demonstration of  SIP adequacy  for Group II
                         areas:
                         a.  Sufficient PM10  data collected for 40 CFR Part 50
                             Appendix K analysis.
                         b.  Attainment status of area demonstrated.
                         Report on the development  of SIPs for Group II and III
                         areas with violations:

                                  GROUP II and III PM10 SIP SPREADSHEET
                         u.   Number of Group II and III areas with violations at
                             10/1/89.
                         a.   SIP development plan submitted,  against targets.
                         b.   Control  strategy demonstration  completed,  against
                             targets.
                         c.   Public hearings held.
                         d.   SIP enters HQ review,  against targets.
                         e.   Final SIP published  in Federal Register.
                         Report number of Group II and III areas with violations
                         newly discovered after 10/1/89.
                                                             A-8
                                                             A-9
                                                             A-9
                                                             A-10
             01,2,3,4
             By Group
             I Area
             Q4 Only
             By Group
             II Area
             Ql,2,3,4
             By  Group
             II Area
             Q2,Q4
             By Region
                                                                                                  OAR-4
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                       MEASURE
SIMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Continue  progress   toward
completion    and
implementation of SIPs  for
Group I areas and for Group
II areas that have measured
violations   of  the   PM^Q
NAAQS.      Implement   SIP
revisions in rural fugitive
dust  areas  in  accordance
with  the   rural  fugitive
dust   policy.      Continue
progress toward  completion
and  implementation  of  an
adequate   PM1o  ambient
network (continued).
Report on data reporting from PM10 networks:
u.  Universe:  number of PM10 sites in the approved NAMS
    PM^Q network.
a.  Number of  NAMS sites in the  network which reported
    data to  National Air Data Branch by 120 days  after
    the end of the calendar quarter against targets.
b.  Of NAMS sites reported in a.,  number of sites having
    at  least  75%' data  capture based  on the  approved
    sampling frequency against targets.
 A-12
Ql Only
             Ql,2,3,4
             By Region
                                                                                                            OAR-5
                                                                                                            12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                       MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Continue  progress   toward
completion    and
implementation of SIPs  for
Group I areas and for Group
II areas that have measured
violations   of  the   PM10
NAAQS.   Continue  progress
toward   completion   and
implementation   of   an
adequate   PM^o   ambient
network (continued).
Report  on Total  Suspended  Particulates  (TSP)  sources
with existing SIP and NSPS regulations in  Group I and II
areas:
u.  Number  of Class  A  TSP SIP  sources and  TSP NSPS
    sources.
a.  Number of  sources in violation, meeting schedules,
    unknown at end of quarter.
b.  Number  of inspections  of  flagged TSP  sources  in
    Group  I  and  II areas,  against quarterly  targets.
    (Data are lagged one quarter.)
c.  Status  of TSP significant  violators.   (Status  of
    Federal  facility  significant  violators  will  be
    counted here and counted again for measure  A/E-24):
    -  Number unaddressed at beginning of  quarter.
    -  Cumulative number addressed,  against targets.
    -  Number returned to compliance.
    -  Number placed on enforceable schedule.
    -  Number with action taken.
    -  Number added each quarter.
    -  Number addressed within 120 days.
    -  Number addressed within 270 days.
    -  Number unaddressed for more than 1  year.
    -  Number unaddressed for more than 2  years.
 A/E-13
             Ql,2,3,4

             Ql,2,3,4

             01,2,3,4
             By Region

             01,2,3,4
             By Region
                                                                                                            OAR-6
                                                                                                            12/89

-------
                                            OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                      FY 1990
                                   Office of Air Oualitv Plannina and Standards
          OBJECTIVE
                       MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Fully   approved   and
implemented sulfur  dioxide
(SO2) SIP  control  strategy
in every State.
Report  on progress of sulfur dioxide  (SC^)  rulemaking
actions.  For each type of action, report  the number of
spreadsheet items completed .

                   TYPES OF ACTIONS

  - Source emission limits for stacks not  in compliance
    with Section 123.
  - SIP revisions:
    — those  in  existing  and   newly  designated
    nonattainment areas (Part D) ,  and
    — those in response to SIP call or State-initiated
    in attainment or unclassified  areas  (Section 110) .
                                                                 ITEMS
b.
c.
d.
e.
f .
                                        Air quality,  meteorology,  and  emissions  database
                                       submitted.
                                       Modeling demonstration submitted.
                                       Public hearings held, against targets.
                                       Final plan submitted to Regional office.
                                       SIP  enters HQ review, against targets.
                                       Final SIP published in Federal Register.
 A-14
             Ql Only
             Q2,Q4
             By Region
                                                                                                           OAR-7
                                                                                                           12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                       MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Fully approved and
implemented sulfur dioxide
(SO2) SIP control strategy
in every State (continued) .
























Report for SO2 sources in SO2 nonattainment areas:
u. Number of Class A SO2 SIP sources and SO2 NSPS
sources.
a. Number of sources in violation, meeting schedules,
unknown at end of quarter.
b. Number of inspections of flagged S02 sources,
against quarterly targets. (Data are lagged one
quarter.)
c. Status of SO2 significant violators. (Status of
Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure A/E-24) :
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 120 days.
- Number addressed within 270 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
- Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.

Report on the status of SO2 sources with continuous
emission monitoring (CEM) requirements:
a. Number of units requiring CEMs.
b. Number of units with CEM installed, operating and
reporting, and for which EPA is processing Excess
Emission Reports.
A/E-15




















A/E-16







Ql,2,3,4

Ql,2,3,4

01,2,3,4
By Region

01,2,3,4
By Region












01,2,3,4
By Region




                                                                                                  OAR-8
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                       MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
All   State   and  major
independent  local agencies
have  identifiable programs
adequate  to  implement  air
toxics  regulations and  to
carry   out  activities   as
described in the multi-year
development   plans  (MYDP)
consistent   with   the
National   Air   Toxics
Strategy and OAR guidance.
Report  the  universe  of  agencies actively  working on
MYDPs.

Report status of overall adequacy of MYDPs:
a.  Number of adequate MYDPs,  against targets.
b.  Number of MYDPs which are not adequate.

Report status of overall implementation for all MYDPs:
a.  Number   of   MYDPs  with  adequate   implementation,
    against targets.
b.  Number  of MYDPs  for  which  implementation  is not
    adequate.

Of agencies actively working on MYDPs,  report:
a.  Number   of   agencies  developing  comprehensive
    regulations pertaining to existing  sources  of air
    toxics.
b.  Number   of   agencies  implementing  cornprehensive
    regulations pertaining to existing  sources  of air
    toxics.
c.  Number  of  agencies  with  no  definite  plans  for
    rulemaking.

Report work under the high risk point source  initiatives
program:
u.  Number  of  sources identified and  funded under the
    program.
a.  Number of sources currently being evaluated.
b.  Number of sources for which final evaluation reports
    have been submitted.
c.  Number of sources for which emission reductions have
    been required.
Report status of  urban air toxics assessment mitigation
activity accomplished.
 A-17
 A-18
 A-19a
                                                                                                A-19b
                                                                                                A-19C
                                                                                               A-19d
Ql Only
By Region

01,2,3,4
By Region
Q4 Only
By Region
             Q2,  Q4
             By Region
             Q2,Q4
             By Region
            Q2,Q4
            By Region
                                                                                                           OAR-9
                                                                                                           12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                  FY 1990
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                      MEASURE
SEWS CODE   FREQUENCY
All States and major
independent local agencies
have identifiable programs
adequate to implement air
toxics regulations and to
carry out activities as
described in the Multi-Year
Development Plans (MYDPs)
consistent with the
National Air Toxics
Strategy and OAR Guidance
(continued) .


















Report for nontransitory NESHAP sources:
u. Number of nontransitory NESHAP sources.
a. Number of NESHAP sources in violation, meeting
shedules, unknown, at end of quarter.
b. Number of inspections of flagged NESHAP sources,
against quarterly targets. (Data are lagged one
quarter.)
c. Status of NESHAP significant violators. (Status of
Federal facility significant violators will be
counted here and counted again for measure A/E-24) :
- Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
- Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
- Number returned to compliance.
- Number placed on enforceable schedule.
- Number with action taken.
- Number added each quarter.
- Number addressed within 60 days.
- Number unaddressed for more than 90 days.
Report on status of asbestos demolitions and renovation
program, for States and EPA:
a. Number of notifications of demolition received.
b. Number of inspections completed.
c. Number of AOs taken.
d. Number of NOVs or NODs.
e. Number of civil referrals.
f . Number of violators with civil penalties addressed.
g. Number of contractors inspected.
h. Number of notification violations identified.
i. Number of substantative violations identified.
(Data are lagged one quarter. )
A/E-20

















A/E-21












Ql,2,3,4
Ql,2,3,4

Ql,2,3,4
By Region

Ql,2,3,4
By Region









Ql,2,3,4
By Region










                                                                                                  OAR-10
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
 Office of Air Quality Plannincf and Standards

                       MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Maintain  an  appropriate
level of enf oroement by EPA
and   State   and  local
agencies.
Report on the status of enforcement actions:
a.  Number  of  State   and  EPA  administrative  orders
    issued.
b.  Number of State civil and criminal actions taken.
c.  Number of EPA civil and criminal  actions taken (to
    be reported by OECM).

Report   on  the   status  of   "remaining"   significant
violators, that is, those  other than VOC,  TSP, SC>2, and
nontransitory NESHAP violators:
    Status of  remaining significant violators.  (Status
    of  Federal  facility significant violators will  be
    counted here and counted again for measure VE-24):
    -  Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
    -  Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
    -  Number returned to compliance.
    -  Number placed on enforceable schedule.
    -  Number with action taken.
    -  Number added each quarter.
    -  Number addressed within 120 days.
    -  Number addressed within 270 days.
    -  Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
    -  Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.
 A/E-22
                                                                                                A/E-23
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
             Ql,2,3,4
             By Region
                                                                                                            OAR-11
                                                                                                            12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

                       MEASURE
SEMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Maintain   an  appropriate
level of enforcement by EPA
and  State   and  local
agencies (continued).
Review  all   major  source
permits during the  public
comment  period,  or,  when
EPA   is   processing   the
permit,   to  process   the
permit within the required
time period.
Report  on the status  of Federal  facility  significant
violators.
    -  Number unaddressed at beginning of quarter.
    -  Cumulative number addressed, against targets.
    -  Number returned to compliance.
    -  Number placed on schedule.
    -  Number with action taken.
    -  Number added each quarter.
    -  Number addressed within 120 days.
    -  Number addressed within 270 days.
    -  Number unaddressed for more than 1 year.
    -  Number unaddressed for more than 2 years.

Report EPA reviews of major sources permit packages, by
State or territory:
a.   Number  of major source  permit packages for which
    reviews    (or  permits,   if   Regional  Office  is
    processing) are due by end of quarter.
b.  Number of packages in a. reviewed on time.
 A/E-24
 A-25
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
01,2,3,4
by Region
                                                                                                            OAR-12
                                                                                                            12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY  1990
                                                    SPMS DEFINITIONS

FOR SPREADSHEET ITEMS RELATING TO OZONE/CO, FM10, AND SC>2

OAR will provide guidance and input data screens for use in reporting the spreadsheet items as derived from the Regional
Priorities Tracking System.  Targets will be established for spreadsheet items during August 1989 and after consultation
between the Regions and Headquarters.

A-2  OZONE/CD SPREADSHEET

Universe:   The total number of  (a)  deficient regulations,  (b) missing regulations, and (c) other SIP deficiencies that
            were listed in the letters to the State Air Directors in spring 1988 and were not corrected in FY 1989.  The
            remaining deficiencies  in the universe, with some exceptions  (for example,  capture efficiency test methods
            or delays caused by lengthy State legislative or administrative requirements), will become the targets.

Status Report on Updating Emissions Inventory:  In Ql, confirm counties included in inventory update, including the
            counties which have major sources within 25 miles  of the MSA/CMSA.  Set target dates for completion of point
            source, area source and mobile source inventories.  In Q2, Q3, Q4, update status on completion of the point,
            area and mobile  source portions of the inventory.

Draft Emission Control  Requirements;   State has submitted  a draft determination of the  percent reduction needed in the
            base year inventory (for VOC, NC^, 00 as appropriate) for the area to demonstrate attainment.

Draft Measures  Submitted:    State has submitted draft measures  (expected to be  included in its control  strategy)  to
            demonstrate attainment, including prescribed measures and state selected measures.

Draft Demonstration Plan Submitted:   State has submitted the  draft control strategy expected, to be  adequate to provide
            for attainment  and maintenance.    Plan must include  the expected benefits  (reductions)  from  the control
            measures, projected  growth  in the  nonattainment  area,  and demonstration that  the strategy  provides  the
            needed reductions.
                                                                                                               OAR-13
                                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY 1990
                                                    SPMS  DEFINITIONS

A-3, A-4  STATUS OF VEHICLE DEFECTION PROGRAMS

Classifications of State/local Vehicle Inspection programs and which ones will be targeted for audits will be negotiated
at the beginning  of the fiscal year.   Reports in Quarters 2 and 4 will address the status of each  State/Local Vehicle
Inspection program that is  classified as  anything except "Operating  At  An Acceptable  Level."   Reclassifications  of
programs will be recommended in the reports as needed.

A/E-7, 13, 15, 20, 23, 24

Definition of Significant Violator

One of the objectives of the Office of Air and Radiation for FY 1990  is that resources be used to  address  significant
air violators and return them to  compliance.   This definition is designed to ensure that resources are used  in the most
environmentally-beneficial manner.   A  violator is deemed  a significant violator  if  it meets any  one or  more of the
following criteria:
                                            *
o     A source in violation  of a  NESHAP,  other than a source violating asbestos demolition and renovation requirements.
      (Because of the transitory nature of asbestos demolition/renovation activities, they are not  easily susceptible  to
      tracking under  the significant violator program.  However, because of  their  environmental significance, they are
      being tracked in a separate SPMS reporting requirement.) ;

o     A source  in violation of new source  requirements,  including NSPS, PSD, and  Part  D nonattainment permitting
      requirements;

o     A Class A source in violation of a SIP if the source  is  located so as to impact a nonattainment area  and  is  in
      violation for the pollutant for which the area is nonattainment;

o     A source in violation of Federal consent decree or administrative order; or

o     A Class A Federal facility violator.

The significant violator program is intended to identify the highest priority sources for the air compliance
program and to provide a special  tracking system for resolving violations by these sources.   The  criteria listed  above
are in no way intended to preclude  EPA enforcement activity against violating  sources  which do not meet the criteria
(e.g., violating  Class Al  SIP sources  in attainment areas)  if  the  State has not  taken,  or  is not taking  appropriate
action,  and if such actions will not detract from the significant violator program.


                                                                                                               OAR-14
                                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY 1990
                                                    SEM5  DEFINITIONS

A/E-7, 13, 15, 20, 21

Definition of a Minimally Acceptable Inspection  (Level II Inspection)

A minimally-acceptable State  or local  compliance inspection is an on-site  visit to the  operating source to  assess
compliance with at least applicable Federal air pollution control  requirements.  At a minimum,  a compliance inspection
must be performed for all Federally-regulated air pollutants emitted by the  source.  Also, a source that is regulated
for visible emissions must be evaluated using an acceptable reference method.  Where a source is Federally-regulated for
more than opacity, a compliance inspection involving only a visible emissions observation is not generally considered to
be a minimally-acceptable compliance inspection.

As  part of  the  source compliance inspection,  an inspector must  record the  process  operating  conditions  and,  if
appropriate,  the control device conditions to determine if any significant change has occurred since the last
inspection, or any process or  control operation outside normal  or permitted conditions  has occurred.  It  is  expected
that minimally-acceptable  compliance  inspections  would  also include at least an  operations log check of process  and
control equipment including continuous emission monitoring systems logs.  It should be noted that these requirements for
a minimally acceptable inspection do not require the direct measure of operating conditions by the inspector.
                                                                                                              OAR-15
                                                                                                              12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY 1990
                                                    SPMS DEFINITIONS

A-8, A-9 PM10 SPREADSHEET

Attainment Status of Area  Determined:   PM^g a^r quality data has been evaluated using Part  50, Appendix K to determine
      whether the area is attaining the NAAQS.

SIP  Development Plan  Submitted;   Areas that  have been  determined to  be in violation  of NAAQS  have  submitted  SIP
      development plans.

Emission Inventory Submitted  (PM10):  The inventory of emissions from sources jjrpacting Group I areas is sufficient
      to develop a control strategy.

Control Strategy Demonstration Completed:    Adequate control measures have been documented  for areas  to demonstrate
      attainment and maintenance of the standard.

A-14 SULFUR OXIDES SIP REVISIONS

Report on Status of SO2 SIP Revisions to Address Regulatory Deficiencies:  The regulatory  deficiencies are limited to
      the following types of  SIP  actions:  (a) unfinished Part D SIPs,  (b) emission limits responding to outstanding SIP
      calls, (c) unfinished or revisions to Section 110 SIPs, and (d) outstanding revisions to stack height regulations,
      negative  declarations,  and  emission limits  for individual  sources  to  comply with stack  height  regulations as
      revised July 8, 1985.

Draft  Rules,  Plan,  or  Declarations Submitted;    A  draft of  the  regulatory language  or  declarations and  modeled
      attainment demonstration has been received by the Regional office.
                                                                                                               OAR-16
                                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY  1990
                                                    SIMS DEFINITIONS
A-18 MYDP ADEQUACY
An adequate MYDP means milestones are included which provide for appropriate activities in all the six MYDP presumptive
component  areas and activities are consistent with OAR guidance for FY  1990.   MYDPs can,  voider certain circumstances,
still be judged as being adequate even though they do not contain all presumptive components.  Where variation from the
"presumptive"  components  would  occur,  MYDP  adequacy  (except as  noted below)  will be  based  on having  acceptable
substitute activities as determined by a case-by-case understanding between the Regional Office and Headquarters.   This
understanding  regarding replacement activities  can take into account several  factors, including: consistency with the
six MYDP  components, current  status of the S/L program, existing commitments established within previously submitted
milestones,  available funding and resources,  potential  for  S/L activity to have an  equivalent  effect,  anticipated air
toxics  payoff of  substitute activities, and  the severity  of  the remaining problems.   Note that this variation  from
presumptive components may not relieve a S/L agency from the obligation to include milestones in their MYDP reflecting a
State or promoted initiative.   Milestones obligating a S/L  agency to complete  such projects (including the submittal of
any required reports) must be  included in the  MYDP for it to be considered adequate.

A-18 MYDP  COMPONENTS - these are  the six components that are presumptively included in an adequate MYDP.

High Risk  Urban Areas;  Adequate  urban workplans,  where  applicable, have been submitted and are being
      implemented on an acceptable timetable and in coordination with ongoing SIP activities.

High Risk  Point  Sources;   A reasonable  number  of  new candidates  are being identified  to the Regional Office  and
      evaluated,  and appropriate follow-up action  is being taken  for previously identified high  risk point sources
      (including promoted and  State/local initiatives).

S/L Capabilities;   An adequacy review of technical, legal,  and resource capabilities relative to the air toxics problem
      has  been completed  and  needed improvements are being made.   Adequate support to  the national program is being
      provided. '

NESHAP  Delegation:   Responsibility  for  implementation of any  applicable NESHAP  has  been delegated and  necessary
      improvements in enforcement of current NESHAPs are being accomplished.

Program Effectiveness;   An  initial  evaluation of current program effectiveness  in accomplishing  air  toxics
      objectives  (including  programs implementing current MYDP milestones)  and a workplan for needed enhancement of the
      present program has been completed.

SIP Integration;   An indication appears  in the MYDP of the significant activities to integrate air toxics concerns
      into SIP planning procedures and control strategy  development.

                                                                                                               OAR-17
                                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY 1990
                                                    SFMS DEFINITIONS
A-19 M¥DP IMPLEMENTATION
Adequate MYDP  implementation means at least 90% of the milestones of an MYDP targeted for adequate implementation in FY
1990 are being or have been substantially implemented and iirplementation occurs in at least  five of  the six component
areas.  Also,  for an MYDP to be considered adequately  implemented, any nationally funded high risk point source activity
(promoted  and State/local  initiatives)  or national demonstration project must be  implemented in accordance with  the
applicable agreements and schedules,  including the submittal of any reports.  Finally, where a formal  commitment to  S/L
rule development exists, significant progress must have been accomplished.

A-19 URBftN AIR TOXICS ACTIVITY

Urban  air  toxics  assessment  or mitigation  activity  includes  study  area  identification,  inventorying/modeling  or
monitoring  assessment  activity   for  multiple  sources,  mitigation  plan  development,  activity  to reduce  air  toxics
emissions from multiple sources,  and mitigation results achieved.

A-19 AIR TOXICS REGULATIONS

Comprehensive  air toxics regulations apply to either all or most air toxics source categories for multiple pollutants.

A/E-22  STATE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

State Administrative Actions should contain provisions that, at a minimum:

o     Explicitly require recipient to take some corrective/remedial action, or refrain from certain behavior,  to achieve
      or maintain compliance;

o     Explicitly are based on the issuing  Agency's determination that a violation has occurred;

o     Require  specific  corrective actions, or specify a desired result that may be accomplished  however the recipient
      chooses, and specify a timetable for completion;

o     May impose requirements in  addition  to ones related directly to correction (e.g.,  specific monitoring,  planning
      or reporting requirements); and

o     Contain  requirements that are independently enforceable without having to prove original violation and  subject
      the person to adverse  legal consequence for noncompliance.


                                                                                                               OAR-18
                                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY 1990
                                                    SPMS  DEFINITIONS
A-25 NEW SOURCE REVIEW
EPA major source permits:   PSD or Part D permits defined as major by the  EPA rules.   For PSD, this includes sources
equal to or greater than  (1)  100 tons per year  (tpy)  if listed and  (2) 250 tpy  if not listed in definition of major
source.   For Part D, this includes all  sources equal to or greater than 100 TPY.  For both PSD and Part D, this also
means modifications to existing major sources which have a significant net emissions increase.

Due By Date;   For reviews  of State or local processed permits, the end of the  public comment period.  Other due dates,
if agreed to by the Agency and EPA, can be used instead.  When EPA is processing the permit,  the due date is  the date by
which the permit should be issued, as decided between OAQPS and the Regional Office; this time period should  be within 1
year of receipt of the complete application unless some other time period has been agreed to.
                                                                                                              OAR-19
                                                                                                              12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
          FY 1990
Office of Radiation Programs

              MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Facilitate development of
comprehensive State radon
programs. Assess
activities, existing
capabilities, and needs for
technical assistance and
training for State
programs.






Implement and support
policy and program
development of the national
radon program.






Report for each State:
a. Number of State/EPA radon surveys completed, against
targets.
b. Number of State initiated surveys (including
schools) , against targets, and summaries of results.
c. Number of private sector surveys and summaries of
results.
d. Number of schools participating in the EPA National
School Survey.
e. Number of mitigation/diagnosis training courses
conducted by EPA, the State, or private sector,
against targets.
f . Number of House Evaluation Program (HEP) and State-
sponsored mitigation efforts, against targets.
Report for each Region:
a. Number of State grants, against targets, for which
Region serves as project officer and evaluates
State's use of Federal funds, including the amount
of such funds.
b. Number of States that applied to the State/EPA
survey program, against targets.
c. Number of Federal facilities to which technical
assistance has been provided in conjunction with the
Federal buildings study.
R-l













R-2









Ql,2,3,4
By State












Q1,Q3
By Region








                                                                                                   OAR-20
                                                                                                   12/89

-------
        OBJECTIVE
         OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                   FY 1990
        Office of Radiation Programs

                      MEASURE
SEMS CODE  FREQUENCY
Implement   national
radionuclides NESHAPs.
Assist   States   in
implementing   Low-Level
Radioactive  Waste   Policy
Act   and    Low-Level
Radioactive    Waste
Standards.
Assure  Federal,  State  and
local   preparedness   for
radiological emergencies.
Report for each State the number of sources regulated by
radionuclides NESHAPs.

Report for each Region:
a.  Number of  sources notified, against targets (total
    number cited in State profile).
b.  Number  of   site  inspections  conducted,   against
    targets.
c.  Number of industrial facility requests reviewed:
    — waiver requests,
    — construction requests,  and
    — modification requests.
Report for each State:
a.  Number  of  facilities  subject to  LLRWPA and  LLRW
    standards.
b.  Whether the State has entered into a State compact.
Report the number of emergency response plans reviewed,
against targets.
 R-3
                                                                                               R-4
 R-5
 R-6
Ql Only
By State

Q2,Q4
By Region
Q2,Q4
By State
Ql,2,3,4
By Region
                                                                                                           OAR-21
                                                                                                           12/89

-------
                                              OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
                                                        FY 1990
                                                    SPMS DEFINITIONS
R-4 RADIONUCUDE NESHAP5
Sources recfulated by Radionuclide NESHAPs;    Regulations are in place for five source categories:  Department of Energy
Facilities, Licensees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Non-DOE Federal Facilities, Elemental Phosphorous Plants,
Underground  Uranium Mines,  and  Operating Uranium  Mill Tailings Piles.   Seven  other sources  categories are  being
considered and may or may not be covered by regulations to be  issued by August 31,  1989.  They are: Uranium Fuel Cycle
Facilities, Coal Fired Boilers,  High-level Nuclear Waste Facilities, Radon Emissions from DOE Facilities, Phosphogypsum
Stacks, Surface Uranium Mines, and Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings  Piles.

R-5 RADIONUCUDE NESHAPs

Industry facility waiver requests:  Pursuant to 40 CFR 61.11.
                                                                                                               OAR-22
                                                                                                               19/RQ

-------
                       OAR
               RADON; # OF STATE/EPA SURVEYS COMPLETED
               (TARGETS)   (cum)	(R-ll
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
6
2
5
8
6
5
4
6
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
0
National
   50
    0
                                                                                 OAR - 23
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                            OAR
                  RADON:  # STATE INITIATED SURVEYS (INCL.
                  SCHOOLS) WITH SUMMARIES(TARGETS)cum(R-l)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
2
4
2
2
4
3
3
1
1
1
2
National
                                                                          23
                                                                        OAR - 24
                                                                        12/89

-------
                            OAR
                  RADON:  # MITIG/DIAGNOSE TRAINING COURSES
                  (EPA/STATE/OR PRIVATE)(TARGETS)cum (R-l)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
4
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
2
3
National
                                                     21
                                                                        OAR - 25
                                                                        12/89

-------
                       OAR
               RADON: # OF HEP AND STATE-SPONSORED	
               MITIGATION EFFORTS (TARGETS) cum.  (R-l)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
National
                     0
                                      11
                                                                                  OAR  -  26
                                                                                  12/89

-------
            OAR
   RADON:  #  STATE  GRANTS FOR WHICH REG.  IS
    P.O. & EVALUATES  AMT.& USE (TARG)(R-2)
Region
Quarter 1
Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
 Target
I
II
III
IV
v
VI
VII
VIII
IX
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
6
7
5
5
4
5
3
  National
     0
     46
                                                         OAR - 27
                                                         12/89

-------
                            OAR
             _7   RADON;  # OF STATES APPLYING FOR STATE/
                  EPA SURVEY PROGRAM (TARGET)	(R-
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
National
  0
                                                                        OAR - 28
                                                                        12/89

-------
      OAR   12   RAD. NESHAPS:  # SOURCES NOTIFIED   (TOT.  #
                  IN STATE PROFILE)   BY REG.(TARGETS) fR-41
  Region
Universe
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
HO
t










0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6000
National
                   0
                  6000
                                                                OAR  -  29
                                                                12/89

-------
                   OAR
   13    RAD.  NESHAPS;  #  SITE  INSPECTIONS
                              CONDUCTED  (TARGETS)  cum
                                          JR-4)
   Region
Universe
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X










0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
National
                                                               OAR - 30
                                                               12/89

-------
                            OAR
             25
 REPORT #  OF RAD.  EMERGENCY RESPONSE	
 PLANS  REVIEWED (TARGETS)  CUItl.	(R-6)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
3
3
2
2
0
0
1
3
2
1
4
6
2
4
1
1
2
National
                                    14
                                     26
                                                                        OAR - 31
                                                                        12/89

-------
                        OAR
           45
 OZONE/CO SIPs; # FINAL STATE SUBMITTALS
RECEIVED (sum of next #)	(A-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
54
127
227
206
318
162
12
21
171
36
0
3
13
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
10
8
13
0
0
40
11
0
32
0
46
27
56
0
163
61
11
0
64
0
54
92
170
155
234
123
12
21
96
27/6*
National
 1334
     59
    27
   114
 984/963
* There is a target discrepancy for this measure.
  The 00/00 shows the headquarters and region target  respectively.
                                                                                 OAR -  32
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       OAR
          46
OZONE/CO SIPs;
DEFICIENT REGS
 FINAL SUBMITTALS  FOR
	(A-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
  Quarter  2
 Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
49
86
108
158
151
115
9
20
145
36
0
0
9
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
10
0
9
0
0
20
9
0
28
0
42
0
40
0
101
39
9
0
56
0
49
59
100
119
125
86
9
20
84
27/6*
National
  877
     18
     76
   287
 678/657
* There is a target discrepancy  for this measure.
  The 00/00 shows the headquarters and  region target  respectively.
                                                                                 OAR - 33
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                          OAR
            47
OZONE/CO SIPs: # FINAL SUBMITTALS FOR
MISSING REGS	(A-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
4
41
13
0
28
7
0
0
14
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
4
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
27
4
0
12
0
0
0
4
0
4
33
10
0
14
0
0
0
6
0
National
  107
                    14
                     51
                     67
                                                                                  OAR - 34
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                       OAR
          48
OZONE/CO SIPs: # FINAL SUBMITTALS FOR
OTHER DEFICIENCIES	 	(A-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
0
106
48
139
40
3
1
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
2
0
2
0
0
0
12
0
50
22
2
0
4
0
1
0
60
36
95
37
3
1
6
0
National
  350
                      _2J_
                     90
                    239
                                                                                 OAR  -  35
                                                                                 12/89

-------
      OAR
67
 # STATE/LOCAL VEHICLE INSPECT. PROGRAMS
IMPLEMENTED SINCE 10/1/89 CTARG)    (A-3)
   Region
          Universe
                      Quarter 2
                     Cumulative
                        Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
3
2
5
7
6
4
1
4
3
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
National
          40
                                                               OAR  -  36
                                                               12/89

-------
       OAR
68
# STATE/LOCAL VEHICLE INSPECT. PROGs.
AUDITED SINCE 10/1/89   (TARGETS)    (A-4)
   Region
         Universe
                    Quarter 2
                   Cumulative
                      Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
3
2
5
7
6
4
1
4
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
5
6
5
4
1
4
3
5
National
                            0
                                       38
                                                                OAR -  37
                                                                12/89

-------
                       OAR
          81
GP I PM10 SIPs;  CONTROL STRATEGY DEMO
COMPLETED (TARGETS)	(A-81
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
2
0
1
0
7
1
0
14
16
17
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
4
3
0
National
   58
                                                                                          12
                                                                                 OAR - 38
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                        OAR   83    GP I  PM10 SIPs:   ENTERS HOP REVIEW
                                   (TARGETS!
                                                  (A-8)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
2
0
1
0
7
1
0
14
16
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
3
0
National
   58
    0
                                                                                          10
                                                                                 OAR - 39
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       OAR
          90
GP II & III PM10 AREAS WITH VIOLATIONS:
SIP DEVELOPMENT PLANS SUBMITTED   (A-9)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
o
o
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
3
0
National
   11
                                                                                 OAR - 40
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                        OAR
           91
GP II & III PM10 SIPS: CONTROL STRATEGY
DEMO COMPLETED	(A-9)
Region
Universe
 Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
• o
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
National
   11
                                                                                 OAR - 41
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       OAR
          93
GP II & III PM10 SIPs;
                                  REVIEW
      SIPs ENTER HDO
     	rA-9)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X










0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
National
                     0
                                                                                 OAR - 42
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       OAR   102    PM10  NETWORKS:  #  OF SITES REPORTING TO
                                   NADB  120  DAYS AFTER OTR ENDS	fA-12)
Region
Universe
Quarter
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
23
25
25
24
59
36
16
16
40
20
20
17
20
18
44
30
16
12
35
15
20
17
20
18
44
31
16
12
35
15
20
17
20
18
44
32
16
12
35
15
20
17
20
18
44
33
16
12
35
15
National
  284
  227
   228
   229
                                                                                          230
                                                                                 OAR -
                                                                                 12/89
                                                                    43

-------
                        OAR  103    PM10 NETWORKS:  # OF REPORTING SITES
                                   WITH AT LEAST 75% DATA CAPTURE   (A-12)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
23
25
25
24
59
36
16
16
40
20
15
15
20
18
41
22
14
12
35
15
16
15
20
18
41
23
14
12
35
15
17
15
20
18
41
24
14
12
35
15
17
15
20
18
41
25
14
12
35
15
National
  284
  207
   209
   211
  _212_
                                                                                  OAR - 44
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                   OAR  111
        SO2: PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD
                              (against combined universe)
                                           (A-14)
   Region
Universe
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
5
5
20
5
58
7
6
4
9
36
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
0
1
1
0
0
0
National
155
                                                               OAR - 45
                                                               12/89

-------
                   OAR   113
         S02: SIP ENTERS HDO REVIEW
                                                                 (A-14)
   Region
Universe
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
5
5
20
5
58
7
6
4
9
36
0
2
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
4
4
0
1
1
0
0
National
155
                   13
                                                               OAR - 46
                                                               12/89

-------
                       OAR  122
               NUMBER OF ADEQUATE MYDPs
                                                                    (A-181
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
6
3
8
16
8
5
4
6
14
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
3
1
6
1
2
0
3
7
3
0
4
3
10
2
5
3
7
11
5
3
4
5
12
3
National
   75
                    15
                     34
                     58
                                                                                 OAR - 47
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       OAR  124
               # OF MYDPs WITH ADEQUATE
                                  IMPLEMENTATION
                                                (A-19a)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
6
3
8
16
8
5
4
6
14
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
2
2
5
2
2
1
3
1
6
2
National
   75
                     0
                                      26
                                                                                 OAR  -  48
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                         OAR  143   # INSPECTS OF FLAGGED VOC SOURCES IN O3
                                    N/A AREAS Q4 - 89  (cum)  (lag 101  fA/E-7)
                        Region
Quarter 1*
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
135
311
291
552
972
289
79
29
430
14
                        National
  3102
*Fourth Quarter FY 1989 data is reported  in STARS  in the  First Quarter  of  1990,
                                                                      OAR - 49
                                                                      12/89

-------
                           OAR  144    # INSPECTS OF FLAGGED VOC SOURCES IN O3
                                       N/A AREAS 01 - FY90  (cum) flag 10)(A/E-7)
           Region
 Quarter 2*
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
8
60
60
74
203
29
16
2
94
0
40
130
120
148
338
79
32
10
186
3
90
190
180
297
541
152
66
15
280
8
         National
 546
 1086
 1819
*STARS data for first, second, and third quarters of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
                                                                        OAR - 50
                                                                        12/89

-------
                             OAR  145   # INSPECTS OF FLAGGED VOC SOURCES IN 03
                                        N/A AREAS 04-90  (cum)  flag 10)    (A/E-7)
                             Region
Quarter 1*
 Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
164
264
314
495
1.150
289
110
48
593
15
                            National
 3442
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported in STARS  in the  first quarter of FY  1991.
                                                                          OAR - 51
                                                                          12/89

-------
                            OAR  147    VOC SVs ADDRESSED;   IN  COMPLIANCE. ON
                                       SCHEDULE OR ACTION  TAKEN  (cum)
                                                   (A/E-7)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
6
4
2
8
1
3
0
2
0
2
12
10
5
21
8
6
1
4
1
7
19
13
11
36
11
7
2
6
1
12
27
17
14
60
16
9
3
8
2
National
 26
                                       70
                  113
                                                   168
                                                                        OAR - 52
                                                                        12/89

-------
                         OAR  163    #  INSP.OF  FLAGGED TSP SOURCES  IN  GP.  I  &
                                     II AREAS Q4  -  89  fcuml  flag  10)  (A/E-13)
                        Region
Quarter 1*
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
20
16
100
76
1.575
111
55
117
408
112
                        National
  2590
*Fourth Quarter FY 1989 data is reported  in  STARS  in  the  First  Quarter  of  1990,
                                                                      OAR - 53
                                                                      12/89

-------
                              OAR   164    #  INSP.OF  FLAGGED TSP SOURCES  IN GP.  I  &
                                          II AREAS 01  -  FY90  (cum)  (lag)   (A/E-13)
              Region
Quarter  2*
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter  3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter  4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
3
5
20
8
303
11
8
4
66
10
12
10
40
16
505
29
16
18
132
25
28
15
60
32
808
59
34
27
198
70
            National
 438
 803
1331
*STARS data for the first, second, and third quarters of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
                                                                           OAR - 54
                                                                           12/89

-------
                             OAR  165   # INSP.OF FLAGGED TSP SOURCES IN GP. I  &
                                        II AREAS Q4 -90  (cum)  flag 10)   fA/E-13)
                              Region
Quarter  1
 Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
51
20
99
56
1.717
111
57
81
419
105
                            National
2716
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported  in STARS  in the  first quarter of  FY  1991,
                                                                          OAR - 55
                                                                          12/89

-------
                            OAR   167    TSP SVs  ADDRESSED;   IN  COMPLIANCE.  ON
                                       SCHEDULE OR ACTION  TAKEN  (cum)   (A/E-13)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
1
3
13
0
1
1
0
10
2
1
3
3
22
0
1
2
1
16
3
1
5
4
31
0
2
3
2
22
National
  11
  30
  51
   73
                                                                        OAR - 56
                                                                        12/89

-------
                           OAR  183   # INSP. OF FLAGGED S02 SOURCES IN SO2
                                      N/A AREAS Q4 -89 (cum)flag KM  fA/E-151
                          Region
Quarter 1*
 Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
3
21
35
141
2
0
16
16
0
                          National
   235
*Fourth quarter FY 1989 data is reported  in STARS  in  the  first  quarter of  FY  1990,
                                                                       OAR  -  57
                                                                       12/89

-------
                             OAR   184    #  INSP.  OF  FLAGGED SO2 SOURCES IN SO2
                                         N/A AREAS FY  -90  (cum) flag 1O)  CA/E-15)
             Region
 Quarter 2*
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
4
3
38
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
8
6
64
0
0
4
3
0
0
1
12
12
103
0
0
6
7
0
          National
  48
  86
  141
*STARS data for the first, second, and third quarters of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
                                                                          OAR - 58
                                                                          12/89

-------
                             OAR  185   # INSP. OF FLAGGED  SO2 SOURCES IN SO2
                                        N/A AREAS Q4 -90  (cum)  flag  1O1  fA/E-15)
                            Region
Quarter 1*
 Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
1
2
21
22
219
1
0
18
10
0
                            National
   294
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported  in STARS  in  the  first quarter of FY  1991,
                                                                          OAR - 59
                                                                          12/89

-------
                            OAR   187    SO2  SVs ADDRESSED:   IN  COMPLIANCE.  ON
                                       SCHEDULE OR ACTION  TAKEN  (cum)   fA/E-15)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
6
0
0
2
0
0
National
                                                     12
                                                                        OAR - 60
                                                                        12/89

-------
                         OAR  208   # INSP. OF FLAGGED NESHAP SOURCES
                                    04 - 89  (cum)  (lag
                          (A/E-20)
                        Region
Quarter 1*
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
40
103
72
125
231
120
13
4
107
16
                        National
   831
*Fourth quarter FY 1989 data is reported in STARS in the  first quarter of  1990,
                                                                      OAR - 61
                                                                      12/89

-------
                             OAR  209
          # INSP. OF FLAGGED NESHAP SOURCES
                                        FY - 90  (cum)  (lag 1Q)
                                          (A/E-20)
             Region
 Quarter 2*
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
20
15
19
57
12
3
0
14
0
5
40
30
38
82
31
6
0
28
3
20
60
45
76
131
63
12
0
42
7
          National
  140
  263
  456
*STARS data for the first, second and third quarter of FY 1990 is lagged one quarter.
                                                                          OAR - 62
                                                                          12/89

-------
                          OAR  210   # INSP. OF FLAGGED NESHAP SOURCES
                                     04 - 90 (euro)  flag 1O)
                         fA/E-20)
                         Region
Quarter 1
 Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
40
81
93
125
280
120
17
4
89
16
                         National
  865
*Fourth quarter FY 1990 data will be reported in STARS in  first quarter FY 1991.
                                                                      OAR - 63
                                                                      12/89

-------
                            OAR  212    NESHAP SVs ADDRESSED;   IN COMPLIANCE.  ON
                                       SCHEDULE OR ACTION TAKEN  (cum)   fA/E-20)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
3
14
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
7
19
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
5
12
23
2
0
0
0
National
                   22
                                                         33
                                     45
                                                                        OAR - 64
                                                                        12/89

-------
                            OAR  222    REMAINING SVs ADDRESSED:  IN COMP. .  ON
                                       SCHEDULE OR ACTION TAKEN fcuitt^  fA/E-23)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
1
2
12
7
2
4
0
0
1
1
2
6
22
18
9
8
5
0
2
2
4
11
34
29
15
10
10
1
3
3
7
16
48
40
17
13
18
1
4
National
  29
   73
  119
 .167.
                                                                         OAR - 65
                                                                         12/89

-------
                            OAR  232   FED.  FACILITIES SVs ADDRESSED:  IN COMP..
                                       ON SCHED. OR ACT.  TAKEN (cum)    (A/E-24)
   Region
Quarter 1
  Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
   Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
   Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
National
                                                                          10
                                                                        OAR - 66
                                                                        12/89

-------
                            ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM

As of January  1990,  the following OAR projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE;
DUE DATE
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
3
5
8
20
26
28
32
73
83
84
87
88
90
97
102
103
105
107
108
109
110
111
112
114
             NSPS:   SOCMI  DISTILLATION                             2/28/86
             NSPS:   POLYMERS AND RESINS                            5/25/90
             NSPS:   SOCMI  AIR OXIDATION                            2/28/86
             NAAQS:   SULFUR DIOXIDE                               12/ 3/90
             NESHAP:   COKE OVENS                                   7/11/88
             NESHAP:   BENZENE                                      9/14/89
             DISPOSAL OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE               1/31/92
             NESHAP:   ASBESTOS                                     9/ 6/88
             FUEL VOLATILITY:  PHASE II FRM                         7/ 1/90
             LIGHT DUTY TRUCK HYDROCARBON STANDARDS               11/15/91
             NAAQS:   LEAD                                          10/24/90
             FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVE TESTING PROTOCOLS              8/15/89
             EMISSIONS FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE (HW)  FACILITIES        4/ 3/91
             NESHAP:   HAZARDOUS ORGANICS                           8/21/88
             NAAQS:   OZONE                                         3/15/90
             GROUND  WATER  PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR RADIATION       4/12/89
             PSD INCREMENTS FOR PM10                              11/23/90
             MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS: NSPS&S111D GUIDELINES    12/ 6/90
             DIESEL  FUEL QUALITY STANDARDS                         7/31/90
             NESHAP:   RADIONUCLIDES                               11/15/89
             HD NOx  AND PARTICULATES BANKING AND TRADING           7/31/90
             NSPS:   SMALL  BOILERS                                  9/ 6/90
             NSPS:   SOCMI  REACTOR PROCESSES                        I/ 1/99
             RULEMAKING:   CHROMIUM (COMFORT COOLING TOWERS)        10/30/89
                                                          OAR - 67
                                                          12/89

-------
                            ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM

As of January  1990,  the following OAR projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking  System.
ACTIVE;
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
OAR
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
HIGH-LEVEL AND  TRANSURANIC RADIOACTIVE WASTE STDS.
NESHAP:  ASBESTOS  ACCELERATED RULE
OAR ENVIRONMENTAL  INDICATORS
STRATO. OZONE PROTECT.:  MONTREAL PROTOCOL &  DOMEST
BENZENE LITIGATION
MUNICIPAL LANDFILLS
VISIBILITY REGULATIONS  FOR THE GRAND CANYON
COLD TEMPERATURE CO  STANDARDS REGULATIONS (NPRM)
IMPROVED EVAPORATIVE AND RUNNING LOSSES CONTROL:
EMISSION CONTROL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM REGULATIONS
NSPS: MEDICAL WASTE  INCINERATORS
DUE DATE

 1/30/92
 8/13/90
 3/30/90
 8/15/91
 3/ 9/90
10/28/91
ll/ 1/90
 4/10/90
 8/ 1/91
10/30/90
 3/31/92
                                                        OAR - 68
                                                        12/89

-------
Office of Water
FY 1990 GOCMs

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                   OFFICE OF WATER
                       FY 1990
           Public Water System Supervision

                        MEASURE
                                                                                               SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Ensure compliance with
existing drinking water
standards.
                              IDENFTTYING SNCS  &  PRIORITY VIOLATORS
                              a)
                              b)
                              c)
                              d)
Report the nunber of SNCs and priority violators occurring
during the specified time frames, for each of the following
groups.  In additions, for each of group (a)  and (c)  [the
micro/turbidity/TIHHJ establish an annual target for the
number of violators and the net percent change in the number
of violators occurring from the fourth quarter of FY 1989 to
the fourth quarter of FY 1990.

micro/turbidity/rnil CHS SNCs
chem/rad CMS SNCs
nicro/turbiditv/rnn HTHCWS priority violators
chem/rad NTNCMS priority violators
(Note: date are lagged on quarter.)
                                                             DW/E-1
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1
                                                                                                OW-1
                                                                                                12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
        OFFICE OF HATER
            FY 1990
Public Water System Supervision

             MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
                    RESPITING NEW SNCS/PRIORTTY VIOLATORS  & IDENTIFYING NEW
                    EXCEPTIONS

                    1.  Report against the "new" microbiological, turbidity, and
                        THflf (monitoring)  SNCs fc priority  violators from 2 quarters
                        ago,  the number which:  returned to compliance; had a formal
                        enforcement action taken against them; or became exceptions
                        this quarter.   Report separately for each of the following
                        two groups.   (Note:   Data are lagged one quarter.)
                    a)  CMS SNCS
                    b)  KTNCWS priority violators.

                        Report against the "hew1* chemical  and radiological SNCs &
                        priority violators identified in the 2nd quarter of FY %89,
                        the number  which:  returned to oapliance; had a formal
                        enforcement action taken against them; or became exceptions
                        this quarter.   Report separately for each of the following
                        two groups.   (Note:   Data are lagged one quarter.)
                    c)  CHS SNCs
                    d)  NIHCW5 priority violators.
                                                  DW/E-2
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                              Q 1
                                                                                        OW-2
                                                                                        12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                       OFFICE OF WATER
                           FY 1990
               Public Water System Supervision

                            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   IHEQUENCY
Ensure compliance with
existing drinking water
standards.
                              RESOLVING EXCEPTIONS
1.  Report the number and percent of exceptions identified
    through the prior quarter which have since returned to
    compliance, had a formal enforcement action taken against
    then, or remain exceptions as of this quarterr.  Report
    separately for each of the following four groups;
a)  miCTo/turbidity/TM! CHS exceptions
b)  micro/turbiditv/TItM NTOCHS exceptions
c)  chemical/radiological CMS exceptions
d)  chemical/radiological NTNCH5 exceptions
    (Note:  Data are lagged one quarter.)
                              1.  Report the total number of EPA administrative orders, the
                                  total number of State administrative orders issued,  the
                                  total number of EPA 1431 emergency orders and the total
                                  number of EPA ocnplaints with penalties.  (Note:   Data are
                                  lagged one quarter.)

                              2.  Report the number of civil actions referred to State
                                  Attorneys General, the number of civil cases filed by the
                                  Attorneys General, the number of criminal charges filed by
                                  the Attorneys General, the number of civil cases concluded
                                  by the Attorneys General, and the number of criminal cases
                                  concluded by the Attorneys General.  (OECM will report the
                                  same data for EPA referrals.)  (Note:  Data are lagged one
                                  quarter.)
DW/E-3
                                                                                               DW/E-4
                                                                  DW/E-5
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                             Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                  OW-3
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                                     OFFICE OF WMER
                                                         FY 1990
                                       Public Mater
                                                                    ion Definitions
EM/E-1  IDEMTIFYTMr
                         fc HtlCR
This measure will report the runber of CWSs which meet the definition of SNC, and the number of NINCU5 which meet the
definition of priority violator  for either a microbiological, a turbidity, an inorganic,  an organic, or  3 radiological
requirement.  Regions are to report four numbers: 1) micro/turbidity/Tnft CMS SNCS, 2) chemical/radiological CUB SNCs.
3) micro/turbidity/TMt MPTWS priority violators and 4) chemical/radiological MIMCHS priority violators.  TOe
groups of micro/turbidlty/TDff violators will be compiled four times in support of the FY '90  SEMS  — on 1/1/90,
4/1/90, 7/1/90, and 10/1/90.   Die two groups of chemical/radiological violators will be compiled once,  in the first
quarter of FY  »90  (on 1/1/90).

Each State shall set a target  for the percent change in the. number of microbiological/turbiditv/Tnn SNCs from the last
SFMS report of FY  »89 (10/I/B9) to the last SFMS report of FY  '90 f 10/1/90).  The national ooal  is  for  a JQ%
in the number of SNCs over the above  12 month period.  The performance expectations may vary from State to State based
on
              circumstances.
                              Regions are to negotiate each State's SNC target based upon  the State's current
conpliance statistics and capabilities for violation reduction.  While some States will negotiate targets which are
less than 10%, we also expect some States to be able to achieve more than a 10% reduction.  The national goal should
not be interpreted as being the maximum reduction that a State should strive for if it is  capable of a greater
reduction.

Karh stat-a shall also set a target for the percent change in the number of microbiQlogical/turbiditv/Tnti Priority
violators occurring from the last SRG report of FY »89 (10/1/89) to the last SttB report  of JTY  '9Q (10/1/90).  T
currently is no national goal for this target.  Regions should negotiate this target on a  case bv case basis.

An at: is a conmunity water system which meets any of the following criteria:

    violates the microbiological NCL for 4 or more months during any 12 consecutive month  period; or
    violates the turbidity MCL for 4 or more months during any 12 consecutive month period, or
    is a "major" violator of the microbiological monitoring or reporting requirements for  12 consecutive months,  or
                                                                                                  OW-4
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                                     OFFICE OF WKTfX
                                                         FY 1990
                                       Public Mater System Supervision Definitions


    is a "major" violator of the turbidity monitoring or reporting requirements for 12 consecutive months, or
    is a "major" violator Of the TOW monitoring or reporting requirements for 12 consecutive months, or
    violates the microbiological MX, or  is a "major" violator of the microbiological monitoring requirements for a
    combined total of 12 consecutive months, or
    violates the turbidity MX or is a "major" violator of the microbiological monitoring requirements for a combined
    total of 12 consecutive months, or
    exceeds the level for any regulated inorganic, organic (excluding TTHM) , or radiological contaminant,  prescribed in
    guidance above which exemptions may not be issued, or
    exceeds the levels for TOW, prescribed in guidance above which exemptions may not be issued, for 2 or more annual
    averages during the year, or
    fails to monitor for, or report the results of, any of the currently regulated inorganic, organic (other than
    Tim), or radiological contaminants since the Federal  requirements for that contaminant became effective (June 24,
    1977)
    violates a requirement of a written,  and bilaterally negotiated compliance schedule.

A Priority Violator is a nontransient noncommunitv water system (MPJCWS) which meets anv of the same eleven SMC
         tha     l  ^Q CWSs.
Major Violator of a Monitoring or Reporting Requirement — monitoring or reporting violations where a system fails take
any samples for a particular contaminant during a compliance period, or where the system has failed to report the
results of the analyses to the primacy agent for a compliance period.  (If the agent receives no monitoring  report or
receives a report indicating that no monitoring was conducted, the M/R violation shall be classified as "major".
Level Above i*iich Exemptions Mav Mrfr P*i T**"^ ~ Analytical levels for all of the currently regulated chemical and
radiological contaminants  (except TOW), above which exemptions may not be issued are contained in WSG-61 published in
1979.  Inese levels will be effective until the  levels are revised (revision is currently in process).  Since no
exemption  level currently  exists for TOW we will use the MX until such a level is developed for TOW.
                                                                                                  OW-5
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                                        FICE OF
                                                          FY 1990
This measure will report the systems which met the definition of  "new" SNC or priority violator for microbiological,
turbidity, and TOfi requirements two carters ago, which returned to compliance, had an appropriate enforcement action
taken against them, or became an exception for the first time this quarter,  for chemical and radiological SNZs or
                                                                        SMCs or priority violators identified in the
the following categories:
micro/turbidity/
1> OB micro/turbiditv/TOW SNCs. 2) CMS chemical/radiological SNCs. 3) mMCMS
               and 4) MMCMS c.hjHpical/rf^ioflogic;;^i  priority violators.
"Returned to Compliance" for SNCs or priority violators of a microbiological MX and/or H/R requirement,  a turbidity
MCL and/or M/R requirement, or a TOW H/R requirement, is having no months of violation (either MZL or M/R),  of the
same contaminant which caused the system to become a SNC or priority violator, during the six month period after the
system was identified as a SMC or priority violator.

"Returned to Compliance*1 for SNCs of priority violators of a chemical or radiological analytical level is conducting
analyses that demonstrates that the system no longer exceeds the level prescribed in guidance above which exemptions
may not be issued.

"Returned to Compliance*1 for SNCs or priority violators of a chemical tother than TOW)  or radiological monitoring
requirement is conducting the required monitoring and determining that the system does not exceed the level prescribed
in guidance above which exemptions may not be issued.

An "appropriate enforcement action" for SNCs Qf priority Violators is any of the following:

(a)   the issuance of a bilateral, written compliance agreement signed by both parties,  which includes a compliance
      schedule,  (only appropriate States)
                                                                                                 OW-6
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
                                                      OFFICE OF WATER
                                                          FY 1990
                                        Public Mater System Supervision Definitions


(b)   the issuance of a State or  final  Federal Administrative Order, Compliance Order.

(c)   the referral of a civil judicial  case to the State Attorney General, or DOJ.

(d)   the filing of a criminal case  in  an appropriate State or U.S.  District court.

A "first time exception*  is a new SNC or  priority violator which was not  addressed timely and/or appropriately.

A "new SMC" is a system which has been  identified for the first time as an SNC.

A "new priority violator" is  a system which has  been identified for  the first time as a priority violator.

Tine I i ness for SNCs antj priority  violators  of microbiological MIL and/or  M/R, turbidity MCL and/or M/R, or TIHM
requirements is eight months  after the  system became an SNC or priority violators.  (T\ro months for the State to
determine, and become aware of, the  system's SNC or priority violator status and six months in which to complete the
follow-up/enforcement action).

Timeliness for SNCs and priority  violators  of chemical (other than TOW monitoring) or radiological requirements is
fourteen months after the system  became a SNC or priority violator.   (Two months for the State to determine, and become
aware of, the system's  SNC or priority  violator  status and twelve months  in which to complete the follow-up/enforcement
action).

    -
An exception is a system which was an SNJC or priority violator and was not addressed timely and/or appropriately.

This measure will track state and Regional  follow-up actions on  exceptions.  We will tally the number of exceptions
remaining *f the  close of  the previous quarterly report  and •nasure  follow-UP activity Which occurred during tfte
current, quarterly report.
                                                                                                 OW-7
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
                                                      OFFICE OF warn
                                                          FY 1990
                                        Public Mater System Supervision Definition?
DM/E-4  MMPHsn»nvE
This measure is intended to identify the level of effort of administrative enforcement activity occurring at the State
and Federal  levels,   me measure is to include actions taken against any system (regardless of whether it 'is classified
33 an-ac. priority violator, non-ac, or non-priority violator.  Qriiv those state actions that are against violators
State ooerator certification rcmiramnt-.q)
                                           Actions against violators of non-SOtt requirements
                                                   mr  iv»
The  information should include all the actions occurring during the quarter — it is cumulative.   This measure will be
compiled all  four quarters during FY »90.  WO actions  "in  the works" should not be counted.   These will likely be
completed  in  the subsequent  three months and States and Regions will get "credit" for them in the following  reporting
period.

•nie  performance expectations for  individual  Regions for the number of proposed and final fQs should be roughly
equivalent to the actions  predicted as being achievable in the  FY  '90 Enforcement Resources  Model.
DM/E-5  JUDICIAL
Till s mfwaire is  intendnrl to  identify the level of effort of  judicial enforcement activity occurring  in the State.
(Federal  Judicial activity will be retorted separately bv the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring),  The
        JS Eft infill ftrt1nns taken against any system regardless of whether it is classified as an  SMC. priority
Violator.
                   Or nQfl-priQritY Violator. _ Qnlv those State actions that are against violators of
                             ed.  Actions against violators of non-SCHA requirements  (e.g. . violations of State
ocerator certification reoui rmnaiLs I should not be counted.
The informatii
be completed in the, subsequent three months and States and Regions will get "credit" for them in the         g
reporting period.
Criminal charges filed by the fCs include criminal indictments and criminal informations.  Civil cases are concluded
when a signed consent decree is filed with the State Court; a judge issues a decision; a case is dismissed by the State
Court; a case is withdrawn by the State Attorney General after it is filed in a State Court; or the State Attorney
declines to file the case.

                                                                                               OW-8
                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                                     OFFICE OF WATER
                                                         FY 1990
                                                 Ground-Water Protection
         OBJECTIVE
                            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Promote risk reduction
efforts and prevent the
contamination of current or
potential drinking water
resources through wellhead
protection activities.
Track, against targets established by each Region, the number
of States which have submitted a wellhead protection (W»P)
program to EPA for review and determination if the program
meets the full or partial requirements mandated by statute,  and
subsequent approval/disapproval.
GW-1
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                 OW-9
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
                                                     OFFICE OF WATER
                                                         FY 1990
                                           Ground-Water Protection Definitions
This measure is designed to build on the initiatives* undertaken by the Regions in 1988 and 1989 with interested States
to promote States'  development of either a wellhead protection (WHP)  program or wellhead protection activities which
are significant components of a WHP program.

             Expectation;
It is expected that each Region will increase the number of States with approved Wellhead Protection programs in 1990.
*Initiatives were activities resulting in movement toward development of a State or sub-State WHP program or wellhead
protection activities.
                                                                                                        OW-10
                                                                                                        12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                       OFFICE OF WAITER
                            FY 1990
                Underground Injection Control

                            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Issue Underground Injection
Control  (UIC) Permits
expeditiously.
Assure that  injection wells
are inspected and maintain
mechanical integrity
Ensure that any potential
endangerment to USDWs is
identified.

Determine what portion of
the regulated  universe has
been specifically reviewed
in any given year and found
to be in compliance with
the regulations.

Maintain a  high level of
compliance  through
enforcement activities.
Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of UIC Class I, II, III, and V well permit
determinations made by EPA and the number made by State and
Indian Tribe primacy programs.  Provide the number of wells
affected by these determinations.

a. Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of wells that have mechanical integrity tests perfromed
by operators and verified by the EPA, State and Indian Tribe
primacy program Directors.

b. Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of wells inspected by EPA and by State and Indian Tribe
primacy programs.

Track, by Region, for State and Indian Tribe primacy programs
and for EPA, the number of Class I, II, III, IV and V wells
found in SNC.

Track, by Region, against quarterly targets for the number of
UIC Class I, II and III and permitted Class V wells or
facilities checked for compliance by EPA and by primacy States
and Indian Tribe primacy programs.  (Report by well class.)
Track, by Region, State and Indian Tribe primacy programs and
for EPA, all wells that appear on the Exceptions List from the
date the violation becomes an exception through the date of
return to compliance, noting the date the formal enforcement
action was taken, if any.                	
DW-1
DW-2
DW/E-6
DW/E-7
DW/E-8
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                 OW-11
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
       OFFICE OF WATER
           FV 1990
Underground Injection Control

            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
                    Track the total number of EPA administrative orders, the total
                    number of State and Indian Tribe primacy programs equivalent
                    actions issued and the total number of §1431 emergency orders
                    issued by well class.

                    Track the number of civil actions referred to State Attorneys
                    General,  the number of civil cases filed by the Attorneys
                    General the number of criminal charges filed by the Attorneys
                    General,  the number of civil cases concluded by the Attorneys
                    General,  and the number of criminal cases concluded by the
                    Attorney General.  (OECM will report the same data for EPA
                    referrals).
                                                 DW/E-9
                                                 DW/E-10
            Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                        CW-12
                                                                                        12/89

-------
                                                      OFFICE OF
                                                          FY 1990
                                         Underground Injection Control  Def initins
DW-1 PEfMLT DETEBKINATICMS

This measure provides an indication of how well Regions,  States and Indian Tribes with primacy are addressing permit
requests so that all operations will meet  the minimum technical and regulatory standards and USDWs will be protected
from contamination.  Identify, for  each Region, State and Indian Tribe with primacy, the total number of permit
determinations which include the approval  or denial of UIC permit requests/actions such as:  applications for permits,
major modifications to  issued permits, revocation and reissuance of permits, or termination of permits for cause.  A
complete permit determination includes a thorough technical evaluation of  the  request, public notification or review
before issuance, and a  final decision document signed by  the regulatory  authority.  States and Regions are to place
special emphasis on permitting Class V wells that pose a  high contamination risk to USDWs or where environmental
controls would be beneficial.

Based on the FY 1990 budget proposal and prior performance by Regions and  States it is expected that Regions, States
airi Indian Tribes with  primacy will make 6,900 permit determinations in  FY 1990.

EM- 2 INSPEmCMS AND MECHANICAL
Definition of  Inspection - A complete inspection should include an assessment of: the well head, pressure and flow
meters, pipeline connections, and any other equipment associated with the injection system; an inspection is complete
only when a  report has been  filed with the regulatory authority.   Based on the FY 1990 budget proposal and prior
performance  by Regions and States it is expected that EPA,  States and Indian Tribes with primacy will inspect 61,600
wells.

Definition of  Mechanical Integrity Test

A complete KIT is composed of a test for significant leaks  in the casing, tubing or packer and a test for significant
 fluid migration into a USDW through vertical channels adjacent to the well bore.  An MIT consists of a field test on a
well or an evaluation of a well's monitoring records (i.e. , annulus pressure, etc.) or cement records.  At a minimm,
 the mechanical integrity of  a Class I, II, or III (solution mining of salt) well should be demonstrated at least once
 every five years during  the life of the well.

 Based on the FY 1990 budget  proposal and prior performance  by Regions and States, it is expected that EPA, States and
 Indian Tribes with primacy will verify that 21,900 wells have been tested for mechanical integrity.


                                                                                                 CW-13
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
                                                      OFFICE OF WATER
                                                          FY 1990
                                         Underround Inection Control  Definitions
DW/E-6 DISCOVERY OF
                    PfTTflJT[Af.
Definition of gfty; — TJi^ terw "significant noncompliance" means:   (a) any violations by the owner/operator of a Class I
or. a Class IV well, (b) the following violations by the owner or operator at a Class II, ill, or V well:'  (1) any
unauthorized emplacement of fluids  (where formal authorization is  required); (2) well operation without mechanical
integrity which causes the movement of  fluid outside authorized zone of  injection if such movement may have the
potential for endangering a USDW; (3) well operation at an  injection pressure that exceeds the permitted or authorized
injection pressure and causes the movement of  fluid outside the authorized zone of injection if such movement may have
the potential for endangering an USCW;  (4) the plugging and abandonment  of an injection well in an unauthorized manner;
(5) any violation of a formal enforcement action,  including an administrative or judicial order, consent agreement,
judgement or equivalent State action; (6) the  knowing submission or  use  of false information in a permit application,
periodic report or special request  for  information about a  well.   NOTE:  in the absence of information to the contrary
MIT failures and pressure exceedence are  presumed  to be SNCs.

This measure provides an indication of  how many wells with  SNC violations have been identified this year to date,
whether or not the wells have been  returned  to compliance.

DW/E-6  ENFORCEMENT AGA
Definition of an Enforcement action against anv Noncompliance;  Any number of appropriate responses to violations:
Warning letter that specifies nature of violation, required responses and possible criminal/civil liabilities;  Field
inspection; "show cause" meeting between violator and primacy agency; Request for new/additional information; Request
for permit application; Initiate permit modification, alternation or termination or impose or modify a compliance
schedule; Issue Administrative Order; Commence bond forfeiture or utilize other financial mechanisms to plug the well;
or Referral to State Aq/Department of Justice (DOJ) (Civil or Criminal). An enforcement action can be formal (See
DW/E-8) or informal, e.g., Telephone call  (appropriately documented).

Definition of Timelv and Appropriate Enforcement Response to Significant NpncomPliance;   The State or Region should
take one of the following actions within 90 days after a SNC is identified: (1) verify that the owner/operator has
returned to compliance; (2) place a owner/operator on an enforceable conpliance schedule and track to ensure future
conpliance; or (3) initiate a formal enforcement action against the owner/operator.
                                                                                                 OW-14
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
                                                      OFFICE OF
                                                          FY 1990
                                         Underground Injection Control Definitions


EW/E-7  COMPLIANCE REVIEWS

this measure provides an  indication of  now many Class I,  II and III wells and permitted Class V wells each Region,
State and Indian Tribe with primacy specifically  reviews  (including an inspection)  in any given year for compliance
with UIC regulations.  A  compliance review strategy may differ from Class to Class  but should include the examination
of: monitoring reports, completion reports of  well workovers, mechanical integrity  test reports, a well's ownership and
financial responsibility  demonstration  and all temporarily abandoned wells.    The compliance review will replace the
file review reporting element  for FY  1990.   Note:   the Indian Tribes with primacy programs will still conduct an
initial file review to assure  that all  existing Class II  injection wells are sited, designed, constructed and operated
in a way that will assure prevention  of endangerment to USDWs.


     8 EXCEPTICMS LIST
This measure provides an  indication of how well  States are resolving incidents of significant noncompliance.  This is
the name specific Exceptions List report which identifies those well owners and/or operators reported in significant
noncompliance  (SNC) on EPA Form 7520-2B for two  or more consecutive quarters without being addressed with a formal
enforcement action or returned to compliance.  Any SNC reported on Form 7520-4 shall be reported until the SMC is
resolved.  Once a SNC is  reported as resolved, it  need not appear in subsequent  reports.

Definition of  a Formal Enforcement Action;   is any action which:   (i)  requires sane action to achieve compliance (ii)
specifies a time by time  action is to be taken;  (iii)  contains consequences for  noncompliance that are independently
enforceable without having to  prove the underlying violation,  and (iv)  subjects  the person to adverse legal
consequences for noncompliance until corrective  action is taken or a well properly plugged.  (Note:  pipeline severance
meets  this definition but a notice of violation  tJiat does not  include ...1 of the four elements does not.   A State
ordered well shut-in is a formal enforcement action.   A shut-in well,  however, cannot be construed as in compliance
until  it is corrected or  properly abandoned. )
                                                                                                  OW-15
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                                     OFFICE OF WATER
                                                         FT 1990
                                        Underground  Injection Control Definitions
DW/E-9 ADMINISTRATIVE

This measure provides an  indication of how many and what . types of enforcement actions a Region or a State is taking
when violations are discovered.  Report the number of proposed EPA AQs, equivalent state and Indian Tribe primacy
program actions, and the  total number of $1431 emergency orders  issued by well class (list EPA separately from State
and Indian Tribe primacy  programs).  Since many Class V wells present high contamination risks to USDWs, all primacy
agencies should place an  increased  emphasis on issuing AOs for this Class.  When counting proposed AOs,  only those
proposed orders that have been issued by the Regibn should be included.  Draft information type orders are not included
in this measure.  Individual Regional performance for the number of AOs expected to be roughly equivalent to the
benchmark targets derived in the FY 1989 Enforcement Workload Model.

DW/E-1Q REFERRAT-S

Federal referrals will be reported  by the Office of Enforcement  and Compliance Monitoring; state UIC referrals will be
reported by the Regions.

Definitions of Case Conclusions;  A case is concluded when a signed consent decree is filed with the State court,  the
case is dismissed by the  State court; the case is withdrawn by the State Attorney General after it is filed in a State
court; or the State Attorney General declines to file the case.
                                                                                                 OW-16
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                   OFFICE OF HATER
                       FY 1990
           Marine and Estuarine Protection

                        MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Prepare environmental
impact statements and rule
making packages for ocean
dumping site designation.


Achieve the 29 commitments
made in the 1987 Agreement
by 1991.
Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for:

    -  number of final environmental impact statements,  and

    -  Number of sites designated.

1987
Track against targets the cumulative number of commitments
in the 1987 agreement that were completed.
                                                             WQ-1
                                                             CB-1
            0,1,2,3,4
            Q,2,4
                                                                                                   OW-17
                                                                                                   12/89

-------
                                                     OFFICE OF WATER
                                                         FY 1990
                                       Marine And Estuarine Protection Definitions
WO-1 OCEAN DISPOSAL PERMITS

If a)  number of  final  environmental inoact statements (EISs) - It is expected that the Regions will prepare EISs for
dredged material disposal sites based on the priorities set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding  (MOU) between the
Region and the Corps of Engineers District Office, and will prepare EISs for municipal and industrial disposal sites
based on national priorities.   The preparation of final EISs includes incorporating response to all comments received,
and making necessary changes to finalize the EIS, which may include updating any of the surveys or special interagency
activities, such as endangered species considerations.

Kbl  number of  ocean  disposal si*"*>g designated — It is expected that the Regions  will designate dredged material
disposal sites as set  forth in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) between the Region and the Corps of Engineers
District Office, and designate municipal and industrial sites based on national priorities.  In the preparation of a
site designation document,  if  the EIS Record of Decision selects ocean dumping as  preferred alternative, the site
designation activity includes  promulgation of proposed rules and final rules.  Also, it includes consultation with other
Federal and State agencies,  preparation of Federal Register notices, hearings,  and response to public comments.
                                                                                                  OW-18
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                       OFFICE OF WATER
                           FY 1990
                     Wetlands Protection

                            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Protect the most important
wetlands and other special
aquatic sites.
Manage an effective section
404 oonplianoe/enforcement
program.
Track progress against targets for the number of strategic
initiatives started.

Number of strategic initiatives completed.

Nunber of administrative compliance orders issued during the
quarter.

Number of administrative penalty complaints issued during the
quarter.

Number of civil cases referred to DOJ during the quarter.

Number of criminal cases referred to DQJ during the quarter.

Number of cases resolved during the quarter.
WQ-2
WQ/E-1
0,1,2,3,4
0,1,2,3,4
                                                                                                   OW-19
                                                                                                   12/89

-------
                                           OFFICE OF WATER
                                               FY 1990
                                   Wetlands Protection Definitions

WQ-2  PROTECTION OF  IMPORTANT WETLANDS AND OTHER SPECIAL SITES

The "Strategic Initiatives"  (SI)  encompasses  a fairly wide range  of strategic activities undertaken
by a Region to improve  protection of wetlands and/or other critical aquatic habitats on a,broad
(temporal/spatial) scale.  An SI  may be extensive involving increased EPA action on a broad
geographic scale in  a major  program  activity  area (e.g.,  increasing public outreach throughout a
State).  Alternatively,  it nay be intensive in being targeted to  a more limited geographical area
(e.g., enforcement in that area).  At a minimum,  an SI must include problem analysis, identification
of goals for the target wetlands,  evaluation"of options to achieve the goals, an action plan,
implementation, and  an  evaluation of results.   As a guide,  an SI  should constitute a program
component that represents one-tenth  or more of the  Region's wetlands program attention. To
"initiate" a strategic  initiative, the Regional  Division Director should approve the action;
"complete" an initiative means to have implemented  all components of the action plan, with only the
evaluation of results remaining to be done.   Examples of strategic initiatives include:  advance
identification, special  area management planning,  other comprehensive or multi-objective planning,
enforcement activity, jurisdiction delineation,  public outreach,  significant active participation in
a resource planning  activity of another agency,  joint activity with State, tribal or local
government, and wetland restoration  and/or enhancement.

The performance expectation  is that  each Region will track existing strategic initiatives and will
initiate one new initiative  during FY 1990.   A more detailed four-page guideline on wetlands
"strategic initiatives"  is available from the Office of Wetlands  Protection.
                                                                                    OW-20
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           OFFICE OF WATKK
                                               FY 1990
                                   Wetlands Protection Definitions

WQ/E-1  MANAGE AN  EFFECTIVE SECTION  404  COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

Section 309(a) administrative  compliance orders  issued by EPA.   As  a general rule, such orders
should require the violator not  only to  stop  the illegal discharge, but also where feasible to take
affirmative action to  remove the fill/or restore the  site.

Section 309(g) administrative  penalty complaints issued  by  EPA.

Civil section 404  cases  that a Region refers,  either  independently  or jointly with the Corps,  to DOJ
for judicial action.

Criminal section 404 cases  that  a Region refers  to  DOJ for  prosecution.

Number of cases resolved during  the  quarter under each of the  following categories:

Number of cases resolved through voluntary compliance, which occurs where the Region has not
initiated any formal enforcement action  against  an  illegal  discharger, but instead achieves
compliance through informal  processes.

Number of section  309(a) compliance  orders where the violator  has complied with the terms of the
order.

Number of section  309(g) administrative  penalty  actions  in  which the respondent has pain the penalty
to the Region or,  in those  situations where payment is due  and not  forthcoming,  where a federal
district court has issued a  final order  requiring payment of the assess penalty.

Number of civil judicial referrals which have  resulted in a federal district court entering a  final
order in the case.

Number of criminal judicial  referrals which have resulted in a federal district court entering a
final order in the case.
                                                                                  OW-21
                                                                                  12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                       OFFICE OF WATER
                           F¥ 1990
               Water Regulations and Standards

                            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Effectively implement the
WQS Program through
adoption of numeric
criteria in State water
quality standards.
Identify, against targets, the States that formally adopt (and
obtain an EPA approval action for) numeric criteria (both
aquatic life and human health criteria) for 307 (a)  priority
pollutants to protect designated uses for all waters that need
such criteria.  Report the cumulative number of aquatic life
criteria and human health criteria adopted in a water quality
standard in each State.
WQ-3
Second/
fourth
                                                                                               OW-22
                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                                         FY 1990
                                             Water Regulations and Standards
         OBJECTIVE
                            MEASURE
                                                                                               SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Identify waters where water
quality is known or is
suspected of being impaired
due to toxic pollutants or
toxicity.
Conduct water quality
assessments to identify
problems and determine
effectiveness of water
pollution control programs.
Identify by State, against quarterly targets, the number of
Regional approvals/dispprovals  (following public notice) of
304(l)/303(d) lists and the number of Regional final
promulgations of 304(l)/303(d)  lists.
Identify by Region, the number of waterbodies and the number of
stream miles, lake acres, estuary segments, coastal miles,  and
Great lakes shore miles that States assess through (1)
monitoring or (2) evaluation, according to EPA guidance for
305(b) reporting.  Identify the number that support,  partially
support, or do not support designated uses.  Identify the
number of waters that do not fully support designated uses  due
to nonpoint sources of pollution and the numbers of those water
affected by each category of nonpoint source pollution.
WQ-4
Quarterly
            Fourth
                                                                                                  OW-23
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                        OFFICE OF WATER
                            FY 1990
                Water Regulation and Standards

                            MEASURE
                                                                                               SHIS CODE   FREQUENCY
Ensure tijnely
implementation of approved
NFS Management Program
elemen
Assist Indian Tribes
treated as States to obtain
program grants under the
CWA.
Identify by State, against targets, the number of Statewide
programs and watershed programs and projects identified in
approved and initiated NFS Management Programs or portion of
those programs that  (1) are completed in FY 90 and (2) have
been initiated but will not be completed until FY 91 or later.
Identify by Region and State, the number of Indian Tribes
qualified to be treated as a State and the number that submit
grant applicatinos.  List Tribes that receive grants (by name)
and for what purposes (major activities and funding sources).
WQ-6
WQ-7
Second and
Fourth
Fourth
                                                                                                   OW-24
                                                                                                   12/89

-------
                                          OFFICE OF WATER
                                              FY 1990
                            Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WQ-3 Implement WOS  Program

This measure implements EPA's "Guidance for State Implementation of Water Quality Standards for CWA
Section 303(c)(2)(B)"  issued  December 12,  1988.   It  tracks  the  number of States that adopt numeric
criteria for 307(a)  priority  pollutants in a water quality  standard.

By February 4, 1990, all  States are expected to meet the requirement to adopt numeric criteria in
a water quality standard for section 307(a) priority pollutants for which EPA has developed section
304(a) criteria, as necessary to protect designated uses.  Water quality  standards should be adopted
for all such pollutants by  stream segment based on information from candidate, preliminary, and final
304(1) lists; State Toxics Program Reviews; and other sources available at the  time of the triennial
review.  This  requirement  is  met for a specific pollutant if a State documents that adoption of a
criterion for that  pollutant  is not necessary because the pollutant is  not reasonably expected to
interfere with designated  uses.

An exception to  the requirement to  adopt  numeric criteria  by February 4,  1990, is  for  those  few
States who were so close to completing a triennial review at the time the Water Quality Act of 1987
was passed that it was unreasonable to expect the State to meet  the requirement during that review.
In that case, the State has until  the  end  of FY  1990 to meet the requirement.   As indicated in  the
guidance on implementing   section  303(c)(2)(B),  EPA will not accept a delay to the  next  triennial
review to comply with  this requirement.

As data become available  from updated 304(1)  lists,  water quality assessments,  and  other sources,
States are  expected to revise  State  water  quality  standards accordingly.   if a  State fails  to
complete a water quality standards review during the  scheduled triennial review cycle, the universe
of waters and  307(a) priority pollutants  for  which  numeric criteria should be adopted  should  be
reflected in the following year's SPMS commitment.  This should  occur only if the Region determines
that the State is at a  point in the water quality standards review process where adoption of numeric
criteria for 307(a)  priority  pollutants will delay the  current  review process.

                                                                                     OW-25
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                                          OFFICE OF WATER
                                              FY 1990
                            Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WQ-3 Implement WOS  program fcont.)

The adoption of either numeric criteria for 307(a)  priority pollutants (Statewide or site-specific)
or a narrative criterion with an approved procedure to translate the narrative into derived numeric
criteria in a water quality standard will meet this measure. The EPA approval action for the adopted
water  quality standard  (resulting in  approval,  partial  approval, or  disapproval)  must also  be
completed for this measure to be satisfied. Targets  for the number of States that meet this measure
must be developed for the second and fourth quarters of FY 1990 and performance data for this measure
must be submitted for those quarters.

Numeric criteria must be adopted for the 307 (a)  priority pollutants needed to protect designated uses
for all waterbodies identified in Monitoring OWAS measure (l)(a).  If  a State  adopts  all  section
304(a) criteria for the  307(a)  priority pollutants for all waters, this measure is satisfied.

The 307(a) priority pollutants for which numeric criteria are needed are  identified from information
used to develop section 304(1) lists, including monitoring data, permit applications, 305(b) reports,
and data  in the  16  categories of data that had to be reviewed  when developing  304(1)  lists.  The
number  of 307(a)  priority  pollutants  for which  EPA has developed  section  304(a)  criteria  is
increasing each year, but now stands at 23 for aquatic  life protection and 109 for protection  of
human health.

The measure also requires that States report the cumulative number of aquatic life criteria and human
health criteria adopted  for 307(a)  priority pollutants in a water  quality standard.
                                                                                    OW-26
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                          OFFICE OF WATER
                                              FY 1990
                            Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WO-4  304m/303fdl  Lists  and Promulgations

In FY 1989, this measure tracked the progress of States in preparing and submitting 304(1) lists and
Regional approvals/disapprovals of those lists.  Statutory deadlines required that final 304(1)  lists
be submitted in FY 1989. However, because of public participation requirements for disapprovals and
for approvals where States public participation is inadequate, some Regional approvals/disapprovals
may not  be completed  in FY  1989.   Further,  because EPA  promulgations  may  occur up to one  year
following disapproval  of a  304(1)  list,  final promulgations may  not be completed in FY 1989.   This
measures tracks the number of Regional approvals/disapprovals and promulgations of 304(1) lists and
sources/amounts of pollutants that occur in FY  1990.

Quarterly  targets  should  be  established  for   both  approvals/disapprovals and  for  the  final
promulgations of  304(1)  lists and  sources/amount  of pollutants.   Performance data  for this  measure
must  be  submitted  quarterly.   In cases  where   a Region disapproves a  304(1)  list; begins  the
promulgation process;  and  the State then revises/updates the 304(1)  so that  it  can be approved by
EPA, that 304(1)  list  is counted in the target  for the  Regional  promulgations.

WQ-5  Water Quality  Assessments

This  measure tracks  the  number  of waterbodies and  the number  of stream miles,  lake  acres,
estuary/segments, coastal miles and Great  Lakes shore miles assessed by each State or Indian Tribe
treated as a State;  the water quality status of  those  waters; and the impact of  each  category of
nonpoint  sources  of pollution  on  the waters.  Water  quality assessments are discussed in EPA's
"Guidance for the Preparation of the 1990  State Water Quality Assessment  —  305(b) Reports."
                                                                                        OW-27
                                                                                        12/89

-------
                                          OFFICE OF WATER
                                              FY 1990
                            Water Regulations and Standards Definitions


WQ-5  Water Quality  Assessments (cont.)

The assessment  guidance established two categories of  assessed waters  (1)  monitored  - waters for
which current site-specific monitoring data  exist  and  (2)  evaluated - waters for which other types
of data, such as land use information from  predictive models and ambient data older than five years,
exist.  Use of  these two categories establishes a  level of confidence  for water  quality data.

A waterbody is  defined as  either a free flowing stream reach identified in  EPA's River Reach File
or an entire or  identifiable portion of an open water such as a large lake,  estuary, or embayment.
When  a  River  Reach  number  is  not  available,   a  water  should  be  identified  by  name  and
latitude/longitude from 7  1/2 minutes USGS topo maps.  Geographically separated areas on large open
waters  (e.g., two different cities on  the  Chesapeake Bay)  should  be counted as separate waters.

The number  of waters  assessed,  the water quality status  of  those waters,  and  the impact  of the
different categories of nonpoint pollution on those waters should be reported by Region in the fourth
quarter.  The Office of Water compiles data from  the  Waterbody System,  State 305(b)  reports,  and
205(j)(2)(C)  updates in the fourth quarter.

WO-6  Nonpoint  Sources

This measure tracks, by State, the number of statewide  programs and watershed programs and projects
in approved  NFS Management Programs  or portions of those programs  that:    (1)  are initiated and
completed in  FY  1990 and (2) have  been initiated but will  not be completed until  FY 1991 or later.
For the purpose of  this  measure,  statewide programs  include educational  programs, sediment  and
erosion control programs, and forest protection and preservation programs.  Statewide programs also
include the enactment  or adoption  of legislation or regulations as well as the achievement of full
funding and staffing levels necessary  for  carrying out key nonpoint source  control activities.
                                                                                    OW-28
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                          OFFICE OF WATER
                                              FY 1990
                            Water Regulations and Standards Definitions
WQ-6  Nonpoint Sources  (cont.)

This measure begins the process of shifting the nonpoint source management and control program from
the development  stage in FY 1989 to implementation.   Because  the  long-term focus  of the  nonpoint
source program is  on  watershed and site-specific clean-up projects, this measure will be  modified
in FY 1991 to place highest priority on  identifying and tracking major watershed and site-specific
nonpoint source  pollution control  programs and projects.

WO-7  Indian Tribe Program Grants

This measure assesses Agency progress  in awarding  CWA  program  grants to gualified Indian Tribes as
required by  the WQA  of 1987.    Specifically,  it  tracks  (by  Region)  the number of  Indian  Tribes
qualified to be treated as a State, the number of Tribes that submit grant applications, and the list
of Tribes that receive CWA program grants (include major activities and  funding sources).  Describe
Regional procedures  for  reviewing and  ranking Indian Tribe  grant proposals and  for  evaluating
performance.
                                                                                      OW-29
                                                                                      12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                        OFFICE OF WATER
                            FY 1990
                 Water Enforcement and Permits

                            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Assess toxicity control
needs and reissue major
permits  in a timely manner.
Assure NPOES permits are
fully in effect and
enforceable.
Effectively implement
approved local pretreatment
programs.
Reissuanoe of priority
municipal permits which
contain interim sludge
conditions.

Encourage permitting
efforts in near coastal
waters.
Track, against targets, the number of permits reissued to major
facilities during  FY 90  (report NPDES States and non-NPDES
States separately).

Identify the number of final permits reissued and the number
modified during FY 90 that include water quality based limits
for toxics.  Of these, report number that are Individual
Control Strategies (NPDES  States, non-NPDES States; report
major and minors separately.)

Identify, by Region, the number of pending evidentiary hearing
requests and track, by Region, progress against quarterly
targets for the evidentiary hearing requests for major permits
pending at the beginning of FY 90 resolved by EPA and for the
number resolved by NPDES States.

Track, by Region, against  quarterly targets, for approved local
pretreatment programs: 1)  the number audited by EPA and the
number audited by approved pretreatment States; and 2) the
number inspected by EPA and the number inspected by States.

Track, against targets, total number of permits issued to
priority sludge facilities containing sludge conditions
necessary to meet the requirements of CHA section 405(d) (4).
Identify the number of permits reissued in near coastal waters
(report separately:  NPDES States and non-NPDES States).
WQ-11
                                                                                               WQ-12
WQ-13
WQ-14
WQ-15
WQ-16
Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1/2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                  OW-30
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                       OFFICE OF WATER
                            FY 1990
                Water  Enforcement  and Permits

                            MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Achieve and maintain high
levels of compliance in the
NPDES program.
Track, by Region, the number of major permittees that area:  on
final effluent limits and not on  final effluent limits (list
separately:  municipal,  industrial,  Federal facilities; NPDES
States, non-NPDES States).

Track, by Region, the number and  percentage of major permittees
in significant nonoompliance with:   final effluent limits;
construction schedules;  interim effluent limits; reporting
violations; pretreatment implementation reguirements (list
separtely; municipal, industrial,  Federal facilities; NPDES
States, non-NPDES State).

Identify, by Region, the number of major permittees in
significant noncompliance on two  or  more consecutive QNCRs
without returning to compliance or being addressed by a formal
enforcement action  (persistent violators).  Of these numbers,
identify how many are in significant noncompliance for three
quarters and how many for four or more quarters.   (Report
separately:  municipal,  industrial,  Federal).

Report, by Region,  the number of  major permittees that are on
the previous exception list which have returned to copliance
during the quarter, the  number not yet in compliance but
addressed by a formal enforcement action by the QNCR completion
data, and the number that were unresolved  (not returned to
compliance during the quarter or  addressed by a formal
enforcement action  by the QNCR completion date).   (Report
separately:  municipal,  industrial,  Federal facilities).
WQ/E-4
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                WQ/E-5
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                WQ/E-6
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                WD/E-7
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                   CW-31
                                                                                                   12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                       OFFICE OF WATER
                            FY 1990
                Water Enforcement and Permits

                            MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Achieve and maintain high
levels of compliance in the
NPDES program,   (continued)
Effectively enforce the
pretreatment program.
Report, by Region, the total number of  (a) EPA Administrative
Oonplianoe Orders and the total number of State equivalent
actions issued; of these report the number issued to POTVte for
not implementing pretreatement; (b) Class I and Class II
proposed administrative penalty orders issued by EPA for NPDES
violations and pretreatment violations; and (c) Administrative
penalty orders issued by States for NPDES violations and
pretreatment violations.

Report, by Region, the active State civil case docket, the
number of civil referrals sent to the State Attorneys General,
the number of civil cases filed, the number of civil cases
concluded, and the number of criminal referrals filed in State
courts

Identify, by State, the number of PGttWs that meet the criteria
for reportable noncompliance (RNC) and tract by State the
number of POIWs in that universe where action taken either
resolved or established an enforceable schedule to resolve RNC.
report separately by State for each action taken:  technical
assistance, permit/program modification, or formal enforcement.
Report, by State, the compliance status (RNC,  resolved pending,
resolved) of each POTW in the universe as of the end of the
year.
WQ/E-8
                                                                                               WD/E-9
WD/E-10
Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                  OW-32
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                       OFFICE OF WATER
                           FY 1990
                Water Enforcement and Permits

                            MEASURE
                                                                                               SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Identify compliance
problems and guide
corrective action through
inspections.
Track, by Region, against targets, the number of major
permittees inspected and least once  (combine EPA and State
inspections and report as one number).
WQ/E-12
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                               OW-33
                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                                Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
WQ 11/12  Permit Reissuance; Toxic Permits

•Hie universe for measure WQ-11 is the total number of major permits with expiration dates before October 1, 1990,
according to PCS data on October 10, 1989 (i.e., the number of major permits that have or will expire by the end of FY
90).  Measure NQ-11 is the total number of major permits issued with issuance dates (i.e., date signed by permit
authority) during FY 90.   Status as of the close of each quarter will be taken from PCS on the 10th of the month
following the end of the quarter.

Measure WQ-12 is all permits (major and minor) that include water quality based limits on specific chemicals or whole
effluent  toxicity and with issuance (modification) dates (i.e., date signed by EPA or State permit authority) during FY
90.  Of those permits,  the number that are ICSs is to be identified.  This measure deals only with final permits;
however,  because ICSs may also be draft permits with a schedule for final issuance, this number of ICSs will not include
all ICSs.  WQ-12 is specifically designed to count water quality-based permits issued in FY 1990.  ICSs are a subset of
this universe.   Since "limit" is specifically designed to exclude permits which only include monitoring requirements,
such permits would not be counted as ICSs.

A water quality-based permit limit is a limit that has been developed to ensure a discharge does not violate State water
quality standards.   Such  limits are expressed as maximum daily and average monthly values in Part I of the NPDES permit.
They can  be  expressed as  concentration values for individual chemicals and/or pollutant parameters such as effluent
toxicity.  Effluent toxicity can also be expressed in toxic limits.  Limits should be reflective of data available
through water quality-based assessments and should protect against impacts to aquatic life and human health.

As a matter  of policy,  EPA regards the new statutory requirements to control point sources as a component of the ongoing
national  program for toxics control.   In the national toxics control program,  all known problems due to any pollutant
are to be controlled (using both new and existing statutory authorities)  as soon as possible,  giving the same priority
to these  controls as for  controls where only 307(a)  pollutants are involved.   Known toxicity problems include violations
of any applicable State numeric criteria or violations of any applicable State narrative water quality standard due to
any pollutant (including  chlorine,  anmonia,  and whole effluent toxicity),  based upon ambient or effluent analysis.
States and Regions  will continue to issue all remaining permits,  including those requiring the collection of new water
quality data where  existing data are inadequate to assess WQ conditions.

                                                                                                        OW-34
                                                                                                        12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                                Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions



Performance Expectation:   The goal of the State and EPA NPDES program is to have reissued major and minor permits in
effect on the date the prior permit expires.  Permit applications are due and should be acted upon during the last six
months of a permit's term.  Host States and Regions, should be able to reissue loot of their expiring major permits
except where unusual, complex and difficult issues prevent timely permit reissuanoe.

Regional  quarterly reports for these measures will be reported to the Director of the Office of Water Enforcement and
Permits.

VO 13 Evidentiary Hearings

The term  "evidentiary hearing" is meant to encompass not only EPA issued permit appeals pursuant to 40CFR 124 but also
any NPEES State issued permit appeals (whether adjudicatory or non-adjudicatory in nature).  The meaning includes any
and all administrative appeals to permit conditions for major facilities, whether the appeals stay or do not stay permit
conditions.  Evidentiary hearings for EPA issued permits are not considered to be pending if they are on appeal to the
Administrator as of the beginning of FY 1990.

An evidentiary  hearing should be regarded as resolved once a final decision has been issued, a negotiated settlement has
been reached, or the appeal of an initial decision has been denied.


Performance Expectation:   Evidentiary hearings should be resolved as expeditiously as possible.  The target should
reflect resolution of all pending hearings.  Although the measure is intended to reduce the backlog of pending hearings,
consideration should be given to new hearings requests made during FY90 that have priority over pending requests.  Such
requests  may be counted against commitments where they are priority cases (based on Regional/State evaluation).


WD  14  Pretreatment Audits and Inspections

A local pretreatment program audit is a detailed on-site review of an approved program to determine its adequacy.  The
audit  report identifies needed modifications to the approved local program and/or the POIW's NPDES permit to address any
problems.  The audit includes a review of the substantive requirements of  the program, including local limits, to
ensure protection against pass through and interference with treatment works and the methods of sludge disposal.  The


                                                                                                      OW-35
                                                                                                      12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                                Water Enforcement sand Permits Definitions
auditor reviews the procedures used by the POW to ensure effective implementation and reviews the quality of local
permits and determinations (such as implementation of the combined wastestream formula).  In addition, the audit
includes,  as one conponent,  all the elements  of a pretreatment compliance inspection (PCI).

In certain cases, non-pretreatment States will be allowed to conduct audits for EPA.  If a non-pretreatroent State has
the experience, training,  resources and capabilities to effectively conduct audits, these audits could be counted.  A
determination of whether a non-pretreatment State could conduct the audit for EPA will be worked out between EPA HQ and
the Region during the commitment negotiation process on a case-by-case basis.

The pretreatment compliance  inspection (PCI) assesses POIW compliance with its approved pretreatment program and its
NPDES permit requirements  for implementation of that program.  The checklist to be used in conducting a PCI assesses the
POIW's  compliance monitoring and enforcement program, as well as the status of issuance of control mechanisms and
program modifications.   A  PCI must include a file review of a sample of industrial user files.  Note that this measures
tracks  "coverage" of approved pretreatment programs, not the number of audits or inspections conducted, which may be
greater than the number of programs since some programs may be inspected/audited more than once a year.
Performance Expectation:  At a minimum,  audits should be performed at least once during the term of the POIW's permit.
Although an audit includes  all the elements of a Pd,  as one component,  the activity should not be counted as both an
audit and a PCI;  it should  be counted as an audit.   In any given year, all POTWs that are not audited should have a PCI
as part of  the routine NPDES inspection at that facility, i.e.  audits plus inspections should equal 100 percent of
approved POTVte, except where mitigating circumstances prevent this (mitigating circumstances will be approved during
negotiation process).  For  purposes of reporting, both audits and pretreatment compliance inspections should be lagged
by one quarter, i.e. same as NPDES inspections.  Also,  where both an audit and an inspection are conducted for a POTW,
for purposes of coverage, only that audit will be counted.

WO-15: Sludoe  Permitting

Priority sludge facilities  are:   1)  pretreatment POIWs; 2)  POIWS that incinerate their sludge; and 3)  any other  POIWs
with known  or  suspected problems with their sludge  quality or disposal practices.  Pretreatment POflVte and POIWs that
incinerate  sludge may  be  considered to be non-priority if such  decision  is supported by information showing no cause for
concern.  The  sludge conditions are to be included  in permitr as the NPDES pern,    -xpires and is reissued.   The sludge

                                                                                                       OW-36
                                                                                                       12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                                Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
conditions may be incorporated in another permit (such as a permit issued under the Clean Air Act, or a State permit
pursuant to an agreement between EPA and the  State) and referenced to the NPDES permit.

WO-16; Near Coastal Waters Permitting

In accordance with EPA's near coastal waters initiative and the Marine Policy,  Regions with coastal dischargers will
accelerate actions for reissuing permits to these facilities.  A near coastal water is one with measurable salinity and
tidal influences.  Permits should contain water quality based limits based on available wasteload allocations and should
be analyzed for persistent, bioconcentratable toxicants.  EPA's Permit Writers  Guide for  Marine and Estuarine Waters
should be followed.  This measure includes all expired or expiring permits (major and minors) reissued in FY 90  (not
modifications).

WO E-4/5 NPDES Ocppliance

A facility is considered to be on final effluent limits when the permittee has  completed  all  necessary construction
(including all start-up or shakedown period specified in the permit or enforcement action)  to achieve the ultimate
effluent limitation in the permit reflecting secondary treatment, BPT, BAT, or  more  stringent limitations, such as
State required limitations or water quality based limitations, or limitations established by  a variance or a waiver.  A
facility on a "short-term" schedule (one year or less) for corrections such as  composite  correction plans, where
compliance can be achieved through improved operation  and maintenance (rather  than construction) is considered to be on
final effluent limits.  A facility is reported to be in significant nonccnplianoe with its final effluent limits when it
exceeds the criteria for unresolved significant noncompliance found in the combinations of violations:

— final effluent limit
— compliance schedule (short ternv'non-construction)
— final effluent limit and compliance schedule
— final effluent limit and reporting requirements
— final effluent limit, compliance schedule and reporting requirements
— compliance schedule and reporting requirements

A facility is reporter i to be in significant noncompliance with its reporting requirements when it exceeds the criteria
for  unresolved significant noncompliance for reporting violations only.
                                                                                                  OW-37
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                            OFFICE OF WATER
                                                FVT 1990
                               Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
A facility is reported to be in significant ronocnpliance for failure to comply with pretreatment implementation
requirements when it meets the criteria  identified in the guidance defining significant nonoonpliance  for pretreatment
implementation.

A facility is considered to be "not on final effluent limits" if the permittee does not meet the definition of a
"facility on final effluent limits" or when a permit, court order/consent order or an Administrative Order require
construction such as for a new plant, an addition to an existing plant or a tie-in to another facility.  A facility is
reported to be in significant nonccraplianoe with its construction schedule when it exceeds the criteria  for unresolved
significant noncompliance violations of:

— construction schedule
— construction schedule and interim effluent limits
— construction schedule and reporting requirements
— construction schedule, interim effluent limits and reporting requirements.

A facility is reported to be in SNC with its interim effluent limits when it exceeds the criteria for  unresolved SNC
violations of:

— interim effluent limits
— interim effluent limits and reporting requirements

A facility is reported to be in SNC with its reporting requirements when it exceeds the criteria for unresolved SNC
violations of reporting requirements only,

Major P. L.92-500 permittees are tracked  as part of the major municipals.


                                                                                                OW-38
                                                                                                12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                               Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
\^Q E—6/7 Exception**

NOTE:  For SIMS report the lumber only.   As part of OWAS, report both the number and the name and the number of quarters
the facility has been in SNC.

Also, the name list must be submitted with the numbers; only the fact sheet,  with justification, will be reported by the
15th day of the beginning of the next quarter.  In regard to all major permittees listed in significant noncompliance on
the Quarterly Honcompliance Report (QNCR) for any quarter, Regions/NFDES States are expected to ensure that these
facilities have returned to compliance or have been addressed with a formal enforcement action by the permit authority
within the following  quarter (generally within 60 days of the end of that quarter).  In the rare circumstances where
formal enforcement action is not taken,  the administering Agency is expected to have a written record that clearly
justifies why the alternative  action  (e.g.,enforcement action, permit modification in process, etc.) was more
appropriate.  Where it is apparent that the State will not take appropriate formal enforcement action before the end of
the following quarter, the States should expect the Regions to do so.  This translates for Exceptions List reporting as
follows:

Exception y«t? reporting involves tracking the compliance status of major permittees listed in significant
noncomplianoa  on two or more  consecutive QNCRs without being addressed with a formal enforcement action.  Reporting
begins on January 1,  1990 based on permittees in SNC for the quarters ending June 30, and September 30, that have not
been addressed with a formal enforcement iction by November 30.  Regions are also expected to complete and submit with
their Exception List  a fact sheet which provides adequate justification for a facility on the Exception List.  The fact
sheet should be submitted by the 15th day of the beginning of the next quarter.  After a permittee has been reported as
returned to compliance or addressed by a formal enforcement action, it should be dropped from subsequent lists.

Reporting is to be based on the quarter reported in the QNCR (one quarter lag).

Returned to compliance (refer  to the QNCR Guidance for a more detailed discussion of SNC and SNC resolution) for
Exception List facilities refers to compliance with the permit, order, or decree requirement for which the permittee was
placed on the Exception List (e.g., same outfall, same parameter).  Compliance with the conditions of a formal
enforcement action taken in response to an Exception List violation counts as an enforcement action (rather than return
to compliance) unless the requirements of the action are completely fulfilled and the permittee achieves absolute
compliance with permit limitations.                                                                OW-39
                                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                                Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
Formal enforcement actions against non-federal permittees include any statutory remedy such as Federal Administrative
Order or State equivalent action,  a judicial referral (sent to HQ/DOJ/SAG),  or a court approved consent decree.  A
section 309 (g) penalty administrative Order (AO)  will not, by itself, count as a formal enforcement action since it only
assesses penalties for past violations and does not establish remedies for continuing nonconplianoe.  Unless the
facility has returned to compliance,  a 309 (a)  compliance order should accompany the 309 (g) penalty order.  Formal
enforcement actions against federal permittees include Federal Facility Compliance Agreements, documenting the dispute
and forwarding it  to  Headquarters  for resolution, or granting them Presidential exemption.


WQ E-8 Administrative Orders

Headquarters will  report EPA Administrative Ocnplianoe Orders (AQs)  and State equivalent actions from PCS.  All AOs must
be entered into PCS by the 2nd update of the new quarter to be counted in the report.  (Include:  POIW implementation
type pretreatnent  AOs; IU AOs  under pretreatnient section 2(a)).  The number of proposed EPA administrative penalty
orders should be tracked by Class  I and Class II.  For State-issued orders,  proposed or initial orders should be counted
where there is a two  step process  (i.e., proposed and final).

HP E-9 Referrals

The active case docket consists of all referrals currently at the State Attorney General and the number of referrals
filed in State Court.   A case  is concluded when a signed consent decree is filed with the State Court; the case is
dismissed by the State Court;  the  case is withdrawn by the State Attorney General after it is filed in a State Court; or
the State Attorney General declines to file the case.  OBCM will report the same data for Federal referrals; State
referrals will be  reported to  the  Regions.
                                                                                                    OW-40
                                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                                Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions
HP E-10 Reoortabl
Regions anchor States should apply reportable nonocnpliance (RNC) criteria to all approved POIW pretreatment programs at
least twice between July 1989 and June 1990.  All reporting should be a sunmary of information that is listed and
updated on the QNCR on a quarterly basis.

Report PGnVte in RNC by EPA State (non-pretreattnent State) or pretreatment State.   Refer to the Guidance for Reporting
and Evaluating POTW Nonocnplianoe with Pretreatment Requirements (Reportable Nonocnpliance Guidance) for a definition of
reportable nonocnpliance by pretreatment POTWs.  One second quarter report should include the number of FOIVfe that met
RNC between July and DPOPB*W 1989.  If a POTW was identified as RNC before July,  1989 and still meets the criteria,  it
should be counted on the second quarter report.  For the fourth quarter report include POlVte in RNC between January and
June  1990 and POTWs reported for the second quarter that were not resolved or resolved pending.  Credit is given for  any
of  the three actions, listed in the measure, that resolves RNC (i.e. , results in resolved pending or resolved status) .
However,  if technical assistance is the chosen approach, a schedule for compliance should be established.  If the
schedule is 90 days or longer, it should be incorporated into an enforceable document.   End of year compliance status
should be reported for all POnWs that were identified as RNC between July 1989 and June 1990.  Report the total number
of  POIWs that are considered reportable noncompliance (RNC) ,  resolved pending (RP) , or resolved (RE) as of the final
     rt.   PGOHs that are in compliance  with enforceable administrative or judicial schedules to resolve RNC as of the
final report date should be counted as RP.

WQ E-ll Pretreatment Referrals

Hie active case docket consists of all referrals currently with the State Attorney General and the number of referrals
filed in State Courts.   OECM will report the same data for Federal  referrals; State referrals will be reported to the
Regions.


WD E-12 Inspections

As the inspections strategy states,  all major facilities should receive the appropriate type of inspection each year by
either EPA or the State.  As part of the NPDES inspection, verification of sludge management practices should be
conducted  as appropriate.   EPA and States collectively comnit to the number of major permittees inspected each year with
                                                    j
                                                                                                      OW-41
                                                                                                      12/89

-------
                                             OFFICE OF WATER
                                                 FY 1990
                                Water Enforcement and Permits Definitions



 a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI), Compliance Sampling Inspection (CSI),  Toxic Inspection  (TOX), Biomonitoring
 Inspection (BIO), Performance Audit Inspection (PAI), Diagnostic Inspection (DIAG), or Reconnaissance Inspection (RI).
 Reconnaissance Inspections will only count toward the commitment when they are done on facilities that meet the
 following criteria:

 (1)  The facility has not been in SNC for any of the four quarters prior to the inspection.

 (2)  The facility is not a primary industry as defined by 40 CTR,  Part 122,  Appendix A.

 (3)  Ihe facility is not a municipal facility with a pretreatment program.

 Oanaitments for major permittee inspections should be quarterly targets and are  to reflect the number of major
 permittees inspected at least once.  One universe of major permittees to be inspected is defined as those listed as
 majors in PCS.   Multiple inspections of one major permittee will  count as only one major permittee inspected (however,
 all  multiple NPDES inspections will be included in the count for  the measure that tracks the total number of all
 inspections,  see next paragraph).

 Ihe  measure for tracking total inspection activity will not have  a commitment.   CEE, CSI, TOX,  BIO,  PAI,  RI,  and DIAG of
 major  and minor permittees will be counted.   Pretreatment inspections for lUs and POIWs will be counted only toward
 pretreatment inspection commitments.  Multiple inspections of one permittee will be counted as separate inspections;
 Reconnaissance  Inspections will be counted.   It is expected that  up  to 10%  of EPA resources will be set aside for
 neutral  inspections of minor facilities.


Hhen conducting inspections of POIWs with approved pretreatment programs, a pretreatment inspection component (PCX)
 should be added, using the established  Pd checklist.  An NPDES inspection with a  pretreatment component will be
counted toward  the commitments for majors, and the Pd will count toward the cxnmitment for PDTW pretreatment
 inspections.  (This will be automatically calculated by 'PCS.) Regions are encouraged to continue CSI inspections of
POIWs where appropriate.   Industrial user inspections done in   conjunction with audits  or PCIs  or  those done  independent
of POIW inspections will be counted as  IU inspections.  Tracking of  inspections will be done at Headquarters based on
retrievals from the Permit Compliance System (PCS) according to the  following schedule:
                                                                                                        OW-42
                                                                                                        12/89

-------
                                            OFFICE OF WATER
                                                FY 1990
                               Water  Enforcement and Permits Definitions
INSPECTIONS
July 1, 1989 through Sep. 30,  1989
July 1, 1989 through Dec. 31,  1989
July 1, 1989 through March  31,  1990
July 1, 1989 through June 30,  1990
REIRIEVAL DATE
The First working day
after the second update in:

Jan. 1990
April 1990
July 1990
Oct. 1990
Inspections may not be entered into PCS until the  inspection report with all necessary lab results has been conpleted
and  the inspector's reviewer or supervisor has signed the conpleted 3560-3 form.

Note; SFMS only tracks the number of major permittees inspected.  OWAS tracks the number of inspections.
                                                                                                    OW-43
                                                                                                    12/89

-------
         OBJECTIVE
                        OFFICE OF WATER
                            FY 1990
                  Municipal Pollution Control

                            MEASURE
SFMS COM:   FREQUENCY
State Revolving Fund
Management
Management of On-going
Construction Grants Program
Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for (1)
net outlays for combined construction grants and SRF, (2) net
outlays for construction grants, and  (3) net outlays for State
Revolving Fund (SRF) program.

Track, by Region, progress, against quarterly Regional
Headquarters targets for the number of States, by name,  which
have been awarded an SRF capitalization grants (cumulative by
quarter).

Track, by Region, progress against quarterly targets for the
number of Step 3, Step 2+3, Step 7, Marine CSO and PL 87-660
projects administratively  completed.
WQ-8
                                                                                                WQ-9
WC>-10
Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                 OW-44
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
                                                     OFFICE OF WATER
                                                         FY 1990
                                         Municipal Pollution Control Definitions
Percents of cumulative net outlays for construction grants and State Revolving Fund SRF to program ocnroitment - The net
sum of payment made and recovered from PL 84-660 projects PL 92-500 206(a)  reimbursable projects, PL 92-500 contract
authority projects, as well as projects funded with Talmadge/Nunn,  FY 1977  supplemental, FY 1978 through FY 1990 budget
authority, Section 205(g) funds,  Section 205(j) funds,  Section 205(m)  funds and all Title VI funds appropriated
expressly for SRF.

Performance Expectation - The cumulative Regional commitment will consist of a construction grants, a SRF, and an
overall component.  The perfonnanoe expectation for the overall cumulative  commitment will be + 5%; however, this
performance expectation range can be widened as long as construction grants outlays remain within ± 5% of ocmnitment and
SRF outlays are within a ± 10% range.
                      •f
WO-9 STATE REVOLVING FUND MAKflGEMBfT

Number of SRF Capitalization  Grants Awarded (cumulative bv fiafiw) - This  is a joint comdtanent by the Regions and
Headquarters.  All the States are expected to be awarded an SRF capitalization grant by the end of FY 1990.  Regions are
expected to base the proposed ooHmitraent on discussions with the States relative to the anticipated complexity of the
State's program and the need  for review by Headquarters.  Headquarters will review and concur in the awards involving
aqqressive leveraging or use  of  the fund to derive the State match.  Where  Headquarters review is needed. Headquarters
will negotiate final commitments jointly with the Regions.  Headquarters will ocranit to a forty-five day review of  an
application submitted by the  Region.
                                                                                                   OW-45
                                                                                                   12/89

-------
                                                     OFTICE OF WATER
                                                         FY 1990
                                         Municipal Pollution Control Definitions


 WQ-10 MANAGEMENT OF Tig CM-OPING OONSTKUCTION GRANTS PROGRAM

 Number of Step 3. Step 2+3.  Step 7.  Marine CSO.  and PL 84 84-660 projects administratively completed - A project is
 considered administratively complete when a final audit is requested,  or for projects that cannot be sent to OIG because
 of related on-going projects,  when all of the administrative completion requirements have been satisfied.

 Performance Expectation!

 The goal  will be to begin FY 1991 with no backlogged projects.

 An acceptable commitment would be the number of  projects that must be  completed in FY 1990 in order to enter FY 1991
 with no backlogged projects  minus those projects that the Region and Headquarters mutually agree are not able to be
 completed during FY 1990.

A  "backlogged project"  is defined as:

o   A Step 3,  Step 2+3,  or PL  84-660 project awarded before 12/29/81 which has been physically cxmplete for more than 12
    months, but has not yet  been  administratively completed.

o   A Step 3 or Step 2+3, Step 7, Marine CSO project awarded after 12/29/81 which has initiated operations for more than
    18 months, but has not yet been  administratively completed.
                                                                                                     CW-46
                                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
                #COMMUNITY  WATER SYSTEMS (CWSl
                INVENTORY	
                                                                    (DW/E-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.882
4,757
5.595
10.935
8.378
8.838
4, 111
3.048
5,173
4.942
58,659
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                                              OW-47
                                                                              12/89

-------
                       ow
                #NONTRANSIENT NONCOMMUNITY WATER
                                   SYSTEMS (NTNCWS):   INVENTORY
                                                row/E-i)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.809
2.468
3.370
4.338
7.723
1.552
1,252
745
1.513
1.166
25,936
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                                                     OW-48
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                       ow
               NET % CHANGE  IN CWS  IN SNC FOR CHEM/RAD
               (FROM 04.89)	(DW/E-1)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
10
5
10
10
10
8
5
10
39

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                                                     OW-49
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
           8
NET % CHANGE IN CWS IN SNC FOR M/T/TTHM
(LAG lOl	rPW/E-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
10
10
10
10
10
8
16
10
14
111
                                                                                     OW-50
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                       ow
          62
EPA D.I. UIC CLASS I. II. III. V WELL
PERMITS DETERMIN. -NEW AND EXISTING   (DW
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I 	 1
II
III
IV
y
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National 	

17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
0
0
12
1
30
46
20
1
9
0
0
119
0
26
2
60
93
40
1
15
3
0
240
0
39
6
90
140
60
1
39
7
0
382
0
52
8
125
187
81
1
50
10
1
515
                                                                                     OW-51
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
          63
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.Ill & V WELL
PERMIT DETERMIN. -NEW&EXIS. (LAG 10WDW-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
70
41
27
167
592
4.114
410
189
858
71
6539
27
13
3
61
55
698
123
37
240
12
1269
54
26
6
133
113
1.374
244
73
479
24
2526
81
41
11
231
174
2.061
363
114
718
45
3839
                                                                                    OW-52
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                       ow
          64
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.III.V WELL  PERMIT
DETERMIN.-NEW&EXIS.;Q4 90  (LAG  1Q)(DW-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
110
54
16
351
240
2.780
487
153
962
75
5228
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                                                     OW-53
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
          65
EPA D.I. UIC WELLS TESTED FOR MECHANICAL
INTEGRITY                          (DW-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
95147
0
80
175
150
120
45
0
260
0
0
830
0
130
250
264
180
90
0
260
0
0
1174
0
230
350
566
365
135
0
350
1
0
1997
0
320
480
755
590
180
0
494
4
3
2826
                                                                                     OW-54
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
          67
PRIMACY UIC WELLS TESTED FOR MECHANICAL
INTEGRITY:  Q4 90 (LAG 1Q)	(DW-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
0
0
40
233
926
15.997
3.125
1.167
4.504
40
26.032
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                                                     OW-55
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
          68
EPA D. I. UIC WELLS INSPECTED	
	(DW-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
95147
0
320
525
420
235
533
25
320
0
0
2378
0
544
850
735
445
1.066
50
320
150
0
4160
0
876
1,550
1,575
910
1.599
75
625
700
25
7935
0
1.208
2.200
2.100
1,370
2,123
100
1.000
865
30
10.996
                                                                                     OW-56
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                       ow
          69
PRIMACY QIC WELLS INSPECTED
(LAG 1O)  	  	 	
                                                                      (DW-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
375
52
371
1.265
5.181
35,348
5.160
6.175
6,192
263
60,382
112
13
103
415
1,696
8.756
1,220
1,407
1.308
65
26.875
224
26
174
661
3.036
17.112
2.400
2,798
2.616
121
29.168
337
39
282
917
4.284
26,564
3.822
4.741
3,924
200
45.110
                                                                                    CV/-57
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                       ow
          70
PRIMACY UIC WELLS INSPECTED;  Q4 90
                                   (LAG 10)
                                             (DW-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
450
52
400
1.213
5.631
35.828
5.300
6.235
5.607
322
61,038
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                                                   OW-58
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                       ow
          74
EPA D. I. UIC CLASS I.II.III.IV  & V WELL
COMPLIANCE REVIEW	(DW/E-7)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
17236
9292
6061
10739
4128
395
7175
37590
2531
95147
0
100
400
150
133
225
0
35
0
0
1043
0
364
800
264
267
450
0
70
0
0
2215
0
515
1,400
566
401
675
0
110
0
0
3667
0
750
2,000
755
535
900
0
150
0
3
5093
                                                                                    OW-59
                                                                                    12/89

-------
r
                             ow
          75
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.III.IV & V WELL
COMPLIANCE REVIEW (LAG 1O1	(DW/E-7)
      Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203139
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
30
132
1.554
791
900
330
201
0
3950
24
0
90
278
3.002
1,610
1.900
639
726
0
8269
36
0
120
409
3.951
2,619
2,900
966
1,251
0
12.252
                                                                                          OW-60
                                                                                          12/89

-------
                       ow
          76
PRIMACY UIC CLASS I.II.Ill,IV & V WELL
COMPLIANCE REVIEW: Q4 90(LAG 1Q)(DW/E-7)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
662
1279
2100
9792
23260
86160
23568
13449
11588
31281
203.139
47
0
150
551
5.029
3,702
3.900
1.314
1,772
0
16,465
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                                                    OW-61
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                       ow
          90
STATES W/ WELLHEAD PROTECT. PROGRAM SUB-
MITTALS IN FY 89; APPROVED IN FY90TGW-11
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
6
4
1
1
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
12
                                                                                    OW-62
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                       ow
          91
STATES WITH WHP PROGRAM SUBMITTALS IN
FY89: REVISED/RESUBMITTED IN FY90(GW-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
5
2
2
1
2
2
0
2
1
1
0
13
                                                                                    OW-63
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                       ow
          92
STATES WITH WHP PROGRAM SUBMITTALS	
IN FY 90	                  fGW-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
4
                                                                                    CW-64
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                       ow
          98
OCEAN DUMPING SITE DESIGNATION:
                                   FINAL EIS
                                         (WQ-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National










0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
4
2
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
8
2
2
1
1
0
3
0
0
0
3
12
                                                                                   OW-65
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                        ow
          99
OCEAN DUMPING SITE DESIGNATION:
FINAL ACTIONS	
                                                                     (WO-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
4
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
6
0
2
1
1
0
3
0
0
1
4
12
                                                                                   OW-66
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                       ow
         101
CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM:  COMMITMENTS IN
1987 AGREEMENT COMPLETED (R3-CUM.)fCB-1)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
                                                                                    OW-67
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                       ow
         103
WETLANDS STRATEGIC INITIATIVES STARTED
(FY 90)	 fWQ-2)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
v
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
8
0
2
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
9
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
13
                                                                                  OW-68
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                       ow
         112
#STATES ADOPTING APPROVED AQUATIC  LIFE
NUM.CRIT.  (STATE NM &  # IN COMMS.)(WQ-3)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
3
2
2
4
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
5
7
6
2
3
5
4
2
40
                                                                                   OW-69
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                        ow
         113
#STATES ADOPTING APPROVED HUMAN HEALTH
NUM.GRIT.  (STATE NM & # IN COMMS.)(WO-3)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
4
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
5
7
5
2
4
6
4
2
43
                                                                                   CW-70
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                       ow
         116
#STATES W/FINAL REGIONAL ACTION ON	
3.304(1) LISTfST NM & # IN COMMS.HWQ-4)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I 	 1
II
III
IV
\7
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X 	 i
National 	
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
5
6
3
6
8
6
5
4
6
0
2
46
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
                                                                                    OW-71
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                        ow
         118
#STATEWIDE NFS PROGRAMS INIT'D & CMPLT'D
IN FY90 (STATE NM & # IN COMMS.)   (WQ-61
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
)u _
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
13
                                                                                CW-72
                                                                                12/89

-------
                        ow
         121
^WATERSHED NFS PROGRAMS INIT'D  BUT NOT
CMPLT'D FY90  (ST NM & # IN COMMS.HWO-6)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
4
5
2
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
4
6
3
8
20
2
3
50
                                                                               OW-75
                                                                               12/89

-------
                        ow
         128
CUM. NET OUTLAYS FOR CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
AND STATE REVOLVING FUNDS  (SRF)    fWO-8)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
555
740
732
643
1.045
301
305
161
649
136
5,267
1.033
1.995
1,389
1.344
2,099
622
585
276
1,148
308
10,799
1,494
3,271
2.175
2.209
3,177
1,016
899
448
1,642
470
16,801
2.035
4,595
2,933
3.089
4.351
1.427
1,280
683
2,202
677
23,272
                                                                                OW-76
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       ow
         129
CUMULATIVE NET OUTLAYS FOR CONSTRUCTION
GRANTS	(WQ-8)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
543
661
663
499
988
169
289
138
627
136
4713
921
1.441
1.237
1,007
1.929
328
547
216
1.035
295
8956
1.270
2.267
1.856
1,530
2.772
514
810
347
1,391
415
13.172
1.700
3,143
2.389
2.060
3,651
733
1,055
540
1,780
575
17.626
                                                                                 CW-77
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       ow
         130
CUMULATIVE NET OUTLAYS FOR SRF PROGRAM
            	(WQ-8)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
79
69
144
57
132
16
23
22
0
554
112
554
152
337
170
294
38
60
113
13
1843
224
1.004
319
679
405
501
89
101
251
55
3628
335
1,452
544
1.029
700
694
225
143
422
102
5646
                                                                                     OW-78
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
         131
CUMULATIVE# OF STATES AWARDED SRF GRANTS
(STATE ABBREVIATIONS IN COMMENTS) (WO-9)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
5
5
1
0
3
3
2
3
3
1
0
21
5
2
3
7
5
4
4
5
1
0
36
6
3
6
8
6
5
4
5
4
4
51
                                                                                  CW-79
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                        ow
         132
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS PROJECTS ADM. COMPL.
(STEPS 3.2+3.7.MAR.CSO.PL87-660)  (WQ-10)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
80
109
165
153
226
108
85
70
72
24
1092
10
22
24
25
47
18
14
12
5
3
180
29
49
42
52
80
32
30
26
16
4
360
50
75
88
84
117
50
46
38
29
10
587
71
107
113
123
157
70
68
56
49/40 *
18
832
* HEADQUARTERS AND REGION HAVE  NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
  00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
                                                                                      OW-80
                                                                                      12/89

-------
                        ow
         133
NPDES PERMITS REISSUED TO MAJOR  FACILS.-
EPA (NON-NPDES STATES)	(WQ-11)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
127
23
0
97
0
232
0
13
17
60
569
4
0
0
15
0
10
0
1
0
5
35
15
0
0
30
0
35
0
3
0
17
100
27
5
0
40
0
98
0
5
4
41
220
81
15
0
73
0
232/151*
0
9
11
52
473
* HEADQUARTERS AND  THE  REGION HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
  00/00 REPRESENTS  HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
                                                                                    OW-81
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                        ow
         134   NPDES  PERMITS  REISSUED TO MAJOR
                                   NPDES STATES
                               FACILS.-
                                fWO-11)
Region
Universe
Quarter
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
87
237
330
409
462
35
101
61
135
75
1932
1
18
22
35
53
6
20
10
5
19
199
7
36
65
69
139
9
34
20
15
32
433
23
80
130
128
266
13
59
30
40
45
810
1 	 69 	
158
252
409/237*
455
33
95
55
115
75/54*
1716
* HEADQUARTERS AND THE REGION HAVE  NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
  00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
                                                                                     OW-82
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
         145
PENDING EVIDENTIARY HEARING REQUESTS  FOR
MAJOR PERMITS RESOLVED BY EPA     (WQ-13)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
National
7
2
0
9
0
10
1
3
13
6
51
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
1
7
2
2
0
2
0
5
1
3
7
1
23
                                                                                     OW-83
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                        ow
         146
PENDING EVIDENTIARY HEARING REQUESTS FOR
MAJOR PERMITS RESOLVED BY STATES  (WQ-13)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
7
46
44
27
20
1
1
5
0
0
151
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
6
0
1
6
1
0
0
0
0
17
3
9
0
3
15
1
0
2
0
0
33
10
12
10
10
20
1
3
5
0
0
71
                                                                                  OW-84
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                        ow
         147
AUDITS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
BY EPA	(WQ-14)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
64
57
88
33
90
96
16
39
0
15
498
2
3
2
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
12
4
8
7
2
5
7
2
3
0
2
40
7
13
10
5
8
10
4
6
1
2
66
13
20
17
11
14
20
8
9
6
3
121
                                                                                 OW-85
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       ow
         148
AUDITS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
BY PRETREATMENT STATES	(WQ-14)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
13
22
45
361
237
28
63
13
0
28
810
0
6
5
12
7
1
1
0
1
0
33
1
10
9
34
15
2
5
1
3
2
82
1
16
14
50
20
4
14
3
6
9
137
3
22
21
101
50
6
23
5
17
16
264
                                                                                CW-86
                                                                                12/89

-------
                        ow
         149
INSPECTIONS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT
PROGRAMS BY EPA	(WO-14)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
9
3
2
11
0
0
4
0
37
18
10
22
9
4
22
2
6
4
4
101
32
15
36
15
8
44
4
15
4
7
180
54
22
70
22
12
77/73*
6
32
23
12
336
* HEADQUARTERS AND THE  REGION  HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
  00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS  AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
                                                                                 CW-87
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       ow
         150
INSPECTIONS OF APPROVED PRETREATMENT
PROGRAMS BY PRETREATMENT STATES  (WQ-14)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
28
50
3
3
1
14
1
106
5
7
6
84
90
6
10
3
34
3
248
8
12
12
132
150
12
20
5
56
7
414
11
16
18
260
251
21
42
8
75
10
712
                                                                                 OW-88
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       ow
         151
PERMITS ISSUED TO PRIORITY  SLUDGE  FACILS
W/CONDITIONS MEETING S.405(d)(4)  (WO-15)
Region
Universe
  Quarter 1
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
36
120
30
85
47
59
243
16
0
25
661
6
0
3
16
11
1
8
0
0
9
54
15
0
8
33
23
6
13
5
0
16
119
25
1
16
45
35
10
18
10
0
16
176
36
27
27
71
47
53
36
16
0
25
338
                                                                                  OW-89
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                        ow
         156
#NPDES PERMITEES INSPECTED AT  LEAST ONCE
                 	(WQ/E-12)
Region
Universe
  Quarter
   Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
592
793
774
1523
1164
1013
357
291
358
300
7165
115
120
148
280
250
126
70
. 55
75
70
1309
270
290
296
640
500
252
110
110
150
108
2726
420
500
444
1.020
750
505
200
165
250
191
4445
592
793
739
1.523
1,100
1.013/903*
339
291
358
300
7048
* HEADQUARTERS AND THE REGION HAVE NOT REACHED AGREEMENT ON THIS NUMBER.
  00/00 REPRESENTS HEADQUARTERS  AND REGIONAL NUMBERS RESPECTIVELY.
                                                                                    OW-90
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                            ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM

As of January 1990,  the  following OW projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE;
DUE DATE
OW      9    38 MCLS  IN  24  MONTHS                                  1/15/91
OW     42    EFFLUENT GUIDELINES:  OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS            3/26/90
OW     59    GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES                12/ 9/88
OW     65    REVISIONS TO NPDES REGULATIONS: STORM WATER DISCHARGES8/ 3/90
OW     73    REVISIONS TO OCEAN DUMPING DREDGED MATERIAL REG       9/30/91
OW     74    NPDWR:   RADIONUCLIDES (REVISION)                       6/30/92
OW     92    GENERAL  PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS (DSS FOLLOW-UP)      1/19/90
OW     95    PLANS TO REVIEW AND REVISE EFFLUENT GUIDELINES:      12/ 8/89
OW     99    EFFLUENT GUIDELINES - PESTICIDE MANUFACTURING         4/30/92
OW    101    CONGRESS REPORT:   403(C)  OCEAN DISCHARGE CRITERIA     1/18/90
OW    102    REVISION TO NPDES  REGS:   S301(H)  MARINE WAIVERS       9/14/90
OW    103    LEAD AND COPPER IN DRINKING WATER                    11/30/90
OW    104    SEWAGE SLUDGE  USE  AND DISPOSAL                       10/ 8/91
                                                                            OW-91
                                                                            12/89

-------
Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response

FY 1990GOCMs

-------
                                       OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                          FY 1990
                                                         Superfund
                                                             MEASURE
                                                               SFM5 OODE   FREQUENCY
Identify and assess uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites in a
timely manner.
Commence action at hazardous
waste sites to remove toxics  or
investigate cleanup strategies.
Implement an integrated
Superfund effort that  focuses
both programs toward selection
of remedy following the
completion of the RI/FS stage.
Implement a cost-effective
remedial construction program.
Number of  sites with Completed Site Inspections
(SI)._/ Year to Date.

SI Candidates Requiring  Further Action.
Reporting  measure only.^/   Program to Date.

Number of  NPL sites  where a Removal action or RI/FS has
started.   Report against combined  target.J Year to Date.
                                    Percent of NPL Sites Addressed.  Reporting measure
                                    only._/ Program to Date.
Number of Remedies selected at NPL sites.  Report against
combined target._/  Year to Date.
Number of NPL sites where Remedial Design activity
has been Started.  Report against a combined target.^/
Year to Date.

Number of Remedial Action activities Started.
Report against combined target. _/ Year to Date.

Number of sites where all Remedial/Removal Implementation
has been completed. Report against combined target._/
Year to Date.
                                    *     'Hi is  tTKMsure  requires Regional  targets.
                                    /    IX? I i nit ion  at crxi  of  program measures
S/F-1*


S/F-la


S/C-2*




S/C-2a




S/C-3*




S/C-4*




S/C-5*


S/C-6*
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
                                                                            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                            By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
                                                                                                   OSWER - 1

                                                                                                   12/89

-------
                                    Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
                                                      FY 1990
                                                Superfund Definitions
S/C-1     Number of Sites with Completed Site Inspection (SI)  - Tnis measure includes only .Screening Si's  .  A SI
          is ccupleted when:   1)  a Screening Inspection Report has been received  by the Region  from a FIT, or the
          State; 2) the report has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate  Regional official; 3) a decision
          has been made en whether to proceed with further site evaluation work;  and 4) the SI  report has been
          recorded in  CERCLIS.

S/F-la    SI Candidate Ooppleted  to Date (Report quarterly percent of universe completed to date)
          The number of SI candidates is determined by the number of sites in CERCLIS that have had a PA completion
          and, based on the PA completions,  have not been classified as "no further action."  Tne number of Sis
          completed to date is divided into  the number of candidates to determine the percent of SI candidates
          completed to date.

S/C-2     Number of Sites Where Activity has Started - Number of NPL sites (Final and Proposed) where on site
          has begun.   On-site activity is characterized by a  removal action under the direction of EPA or
          through an:  Administrative Order, Consent Decree,  or  judgement;  or where a  first RI/FS has been
          implemented at the site.
          Fund-Financed;
          PRP-Financed;
A Fund Removal counts  toward this target when:
1) Ihe Action Memorandum has been approved by the On Site Coordinator
(OSC), Regional Administrator (RA),  or Assistant Administrator  (AA); and,
2) a  contract has been signed for an EPA or U.S. Coast Guard  (USCG)
on-site removal; and 3)  an obligation for  the removal has either been
recorded in the Financial Management System  (FMS), or has been reported
and documented in CERCLIS or when the OSC  activates $50,000; and 4) there is
no current or previous on-site Fund-financed  or PRP Removal activity;
and 5) on-site removal work  has begun. Ine date the on-site work began is the start
date  for the removal action.

A Potentially Responsible Party (PRP)  Removal counts toward this measure when:
1) there is no current or prior on-site  Fund-financed or PRP removal
activity; and 2) there is on-site removal  activity financed by the
PRP in compliance with an Administrative Order (Unilateral or On Consent)
or Consent Decree, or  judgment.   Tne date  the on-site work began
as entered in CKRCLJS  will be considered the  start date for the PRP Removal.
It the PKP does not comply with a Unilateral  Order, credit is not given.
Where a PRP is in substantial  non-compliance, credit will be withdrawn.
                                                                       OSWER - 2
                                                                       12/89

-------
                          Offioe of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
                                             FY 1990
                                      Superfund Definitions


Site status  (NPL or Non-NPL) will be determined  by the status indicated in CERCLI3 when aoconplishment
reports are pulled.  A First KL/FS means that there has been no prior RI/FS activity at that site.

Fund-Financed:    A Fund Program RI/FS  start is counted when:  1)  Either a contract has been signed
                  by the Procurement and Contracts Management Division (PCMD),  or a Cooperative
                  Agreement has been signed by the Regional Administrator to conduct a RI/FS,  and
                  2) obligations have been recorded or documented in CERCLIS as of the end of the
                  reporting period and  3)  there is no prior settlement with a PRP for a RI/FS.

The Fund-financed Start is  defined as the date of first obligation for a: RI,  FS,  or RI/FS at site.
Obligations for forward planning activities, comnunity  relations  planning and/or  similar
support activities do  not constitute an RI/FS start.  Fund-financed RI/FS include:  Federal (F),
State  (S), State Enforcement (SE) and  in-house  (EP)  lead projects as these leads are used in the FY 1990
SCAP Manual.  The appropriate dates must be recorded in CERCLIS.

PRP-Financed;     A  PRP lead RI/FS Start occurs when an Administrative Order on Consent is
                  issued or a Consent Decree is referred to Headquarters or the Department of
                  Justice (DOJ)  for a RI/FS, and there has been no Fund obligation and no previous
                  settlements for:   RI, FS,  or RI/FS (see above).   The start date  is defined as the
                  last signature date by the appropriate official  or party (e.g.,  the RA,  DOJ,  or
                  private party on the  Administrative Order on Consent),  or the date of referral  to
                  Headguarters  of a Consent Decree for the PRP to conduct the RI/FS.   If the PRPs
                  are  performing the RI/FS under a State Order or comparable Enforcement document
                  and  the site  is covered by a:  State Enforcement Cooperative Agreement,  Superfund
                  Memorandum of Agreement (SMOA), or other EPA/State agreement;  credit will be  given based
                  on the date the State order is signed by the last appropriate official or party. (If
                  there is  a Settlement for Multiple Operable  Units,  the start  date for the first RI/FS
                  would be  the  last signature date by the appropriate Federal agency or party.) The
                  appropriate dates must be recorded in CERCLIS.

PRP-financed RI/FS's include: Responsible Party (RP),  Mixed Funding (MR), and Responsible Party
under State order with Federally funded oversight (PS).
                                                                                         OSWER - 3

                                                                                          12/89

-------
                                     Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
                                                        FY 1990
                                                Superfund Definitions
           A shift between a Fund, or PRP RI/FS, can occur when there has been a Fund obligation, and work
           has not proceeded beyond the RI/FS Work Plan approval stage.  If a PRP takes over a RI/FS before or
           at this juncture, the RI/FS lead at this site should be changed from the Fund to PRP.  If the PRP
           begins the RI/FS and it is subsequently taken over by the Fund the same criteria apply.

           Site status (NPL or Non-NPL) will be determined by the status indicated in CERCUS when
           acocnplishment reports are pulled..

S/C-2a    NPL Sites Addressed to Date (Report quarterly as percent of universe)
           The number of proposed or final NPL sites where a removal action, RI/FS, enforcement
           action (Section 106 referral or Unilateral order) or RCRA corrective action has taken place.
           RI/FS starts includes Federal Facility, State  Enforcement (with or without EPA involvement),  and
           State financed projects.

S/C-3      Number of Remedies Selected at NPL Sites
           A  Record of Decision (ROD) has been  signed  by either the Regional Administrator or Assistant
           Administrator for OSWER,  and the appropriate date has  been recorded in CERCLIS.   Ine signature date by
           the RA or AA represents the ROD completion date.  Remedies selected include:  Federal (F),  Federal
           Enforcement (FE),  and Federal  Facility (FF).

S/C-4      Number of NPL sites where Remedial Design (RD)  activity has been Started
           Funding or PRP Contract Award  for Remedial  Designs at NPL Sites
          Fund Financed:
          PRP-Financed:
Sites where an obligation has been made under contract,  Inter-Agency Agreement  (IAG),
or Cooperative Agreement,  to conduct a Design on site.   Obligations for design assistance
or technical assistance do not constitute a Remedial  Design Start.  The obligation must
be recorded and documented in CERCLIS at the end of the  reporting period.  Fund financed
design include: Federal (F),  State (S)  ,  State Enforcement (SE) and in-house (EP) lead
projects as these  leads are used in FY 1990 SCAP Manual.

Credit for  any RD  start is given when one of the following (as recorded in CERCLIS)
occurs; Pursuant to a   Enforcement settlement document,  the date on which the PRP(s) award
a contract  to conduct  Design at the site:  2)  Pursuant to an Enforcement settlement

-------
                                    Office of Solid Waste  and
         Response
                                                       FY 1990
                                                Superfund Definitions
                          of the RD notice to proceed;  or 3)  Where the PRP(s)  have performed a KL/FS  under State
                          Order or comparable Enforcement document  and the  site  is covered by State Enforcement
                          Cooperative Agreement and EPA has approved the  select  remedy,  credit will be given based
                          on the issuance of a State Order  for RD (or RD/RA)  or, if the RD is covered by a pre-
                          existing State Order,  the RD Notice to Proceed date.
          PRP-financed designs include Responsible Party (RP)
          order with Federally funded oversight (PS).
Mixed Funding (MR) and Responsible Party under State
S/C-5     Number of NPL sites where Remedial Action (RAj activity has been Started

          Funding  for Remedial Actions at NPL Sites

          Sites where an obligation has been made under a contract,  IAG or Cooperative agreement to conduct
          a construction activity at the site.  The obligation must be recorded and documented  in
          CERCLIS  as of the end of the reporting period. Only Federal and State lead projects are  included
          in this  category.

          RemedialActions  by FRPs at NPL Sites

          Credit for an RA  Start is given when one of the following occurs,  and has been recorded  in
          CERCLIS.  1)  The  RD is completed under terms of the RD/RA settlement decision
          (Administrative Order or Consent Decree).   The date on which EPA approves the RP design  package
          determines the quarter in which the RA start is counted.   2)  The RD is completed under
          terms of a Section 106 Judgment or Order which includes RA work.   The date on which
          EPA approves  the  PRP's design package and enters the date in CERCLIS determines the guarter in
          which the RA  start is counted.   3)  When the RD is completed under a State order or comparable
          Enforcement document,  and the site is covered by a State Enforcement Cooperative Agreement or
          Superfund Memorandum of Agreement (SMQA),  and EPA has approved the Remedial Design package,
          credit will be given for a Remedial Action start based on the date the design package
          was approved  by EPA.   4)  Where the Fund has completed the RD and the PRPs are either in  compliance
          with a Unilateral  Administrative Order (UAO)  or have reached settlement for the RA.  The date of
          conpliance with the UAO, or the date  the  Consent Decree  is referred to HQ or DOJ (as recorded in
          CERCLJS) will  be  the basis for credit.  Where a PRP is in significant non-compliance with the UAO,
          credit will be withdrawn.
                                                                                                   OSWER - 5

                                                                                                   12/89

-------
                                      Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Waste
                                                       FY 1990
                                              Superfund Definitions
          ** Combined (FUnd and PRP)  quarterly and annual targets will remain constant throughout the  fiscal
             year.  However,  in the case of a FRP takeover at a targeted site,  a corresponding PRP SCAP target
             increase,  Fund SCAP target decrease will occur automatically.

S/C-6     Number of NPL Sites where All Remedial/Removal Implementation has been Completed

          Number of sites where all construction or  removal  actions  for operable units have been completed and the
          site meets  on of the following criteria: 1) a no further action Ruu nas been signed by the Assistant
          Administrator or the  Regional Administrator; or 2)  a final  construction inspection have
          been completed,  and the Regional Administrator signs an  interim or  final Superfund Close-out Report which
          summarizes the  site condition and construction activities and demonstrates that the NCP criteria for
          deletion have been met or that the only remaining  activity is Long Term Response or performance
          monitoring, and the appropriate data has been recorded in  CERCUS. Ine date the interim or final
          Superfund Close-out Report  is signed is the date of the  Final  Completion; or 3) the final cleanup at a
          site is based upon a Removal Action:
          Fund-Financed:
        PRP-Financed:
  A site is completed through a removal action when:  1) The OSC demobilizes the cleanup
  contractor,  and;  2)  conditions specified in the Action Memorandum have been met and a
  completion date has  been entered into CERCUS.

A site is completed through a removal  action when: 1) A PRP has completed the removal
action under the terms of an Administrative Order (Unilateral or On Consent), Consent
Decree or  judgement, and the Region has certified that date through entering a completion
date in CERCLLS.
                                                                                                  OSWER - 6

                                                                                                  12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
Achieve and maintain
maximum levels of clean-up
through removal enforcement
Achieve
                levels of
reimbursement of Trust Fund
monies expended in site
clean-up.
                                    OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                      FY  1990
                                               Superfund  Enforcement

                                                          MEASURE
                                                                                                    COUE   FREQUENCY
Administrative Orders for Removal Action
Report Administrative Orders (Unilateral or On Consent)
for Removal Action signed and issued by EPA within the
quarter.
(a) NPL
(b) Non-NPL
Cost Recovery Actions Greater Than $200,000
Target and report sites for civil referrals, with or "
without settlement, for greater than or equal to
$200,000.
(a) Section 107 Site Referrals for Pre-Remedial
Actions.
(b) Section 107 Site Referrals for Remedial Actions.
(c) Section 106/107 Site Referrals Pre-Remedial
Actions.
(d) Section 106/107 Site Referrals Remedial Actions.
Cost Recovery Achieved
Report the total amount of dollars resulting from cost
recovery achieved through: litigation, settlements,
administrative orders, and oversight costs. _/
/ Definition at end of program measures.
* 'In is measure requires Regional targets.
S/E-1
(a)
(b)
S/E-2
(a)*
(b)*
(c)
(d)
S/E-3


Q 1,2,3,4
By Regior

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region



Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

                                                                                               OSWER - 7

                                                                                              12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                   FY 1990
            Superfund Enforcement

                       MEASURE
SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
                         Section 106 or 106/107 Referrals or Unilateral Orders
                         for RD/RA J

                         (a)   Sites with Section 106 Referrals Without
                               Settlement
                         (b)   Sites with Section 106 Referrals with Settlement
                         (c)   Sites issued, RD/RA Unilateral Administrative
                               Orders
                         For Federal Facilities on the NPL or Proposed for tlie
                         NFL

                         Target and Report Inter-Agency Agreements  (lAGs)

                         Credit is given  for lAGs  signed  at NPL or proposed NPL
                         sites for a RI,  FS, RD, RA or RD/RA  only.  Credit is
                         given for any of the following:   A signed IAG for a RI,
                         FS, RD, RA or RD/RA only;_/

                            -  Issuance of a RCRA  Section 3008 (h) Corrective
                               Action Order
                            -  Referral of a CERCLA Section 106 Administrative
                               Order to the Department of Justice (DOT)  for
                               concurrence;
                            -  Issuance of a RCRA  Permit  addressing all releases
                               and all CERCLA requirements; or
                            -  A formal referral has been made to the Assistant
                               Administrator, OSWER, for  dispute resolution.
                         A site can only receive credit once under this measure

                          / Definition at end of program  measures.
                         *  TTus measure requires  Regional targets.	
                                                             S/E-4
                                                               (a)*

                                                               (b)*
                                                               (c)*
                                                             S/E-5*
             Q 1,2,3,4
             By Region
             Q 1,2,3,4
             By Region
                                                                                      OSWER - 8

-------
                                      OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                         FY  1990
                                            Superfund Enforcement Definitions

S/E-1    Administrative Orders for Removal Actions

         Credit  is provided where a Section 106 administrative order  (Unilateral or On Consent) has been signed by the
         Regional  Administrator and the date has been recorded in CERCLIS.  Credit is given for each order issued at the
         site.   Excluded from this measure are administrative orders for site access.  This is a reporting measure for
         (a) NPL and  (b)  Non-NFL sites.

S/E-2*   Cost Recovery  Actions Greater than $200.000

         Targets will be established for sites, with or without settlement, for past expenditures greater than or equal
         to $200,000 under:  (a)  Section 107 (only)  for "Pre-Remedial Action (RA)11 events (Removal, IRM,  ERA,  RI/FS,  RD),
         (b) Section 107  (only)  for Remedial Action, and other Pre-RA site response.   Targets are based en the number of
         sites addressed  in the referral and must include at a iriinimum all responses greater than $200,000 where there
         is a potential statute of limitation (SOL)  problem and there are viable PRPs.  If a Region fails to  resolve a
         SOL site, it will  be considered to have missed the target even if it refers cases in excess of its target.
         Regions are responsible for meeting the respective targets for both (a)  Pre-RA and (b)  Remedial Action
         referrals.
         Regions must report sites with or without settlement greater than or equal to $200,000 for (c)  Section 106/107
         Pre-RA actions  (Removals, et.  al.) and (d)  Section 106/107 Remedial Actions (RA et.  al.)  and other Pre-RA
         events.

         Credit for any of the above categories is based on the Regional Administrator's signature date  on  the  referral
         transmittal letter (as  reflected in CERCLIS)  to the Office of Enforcement Compliance .Monitoring (OECM)  or the
         Department of Justice  (DOJ).   In addition,  credit will be withdrawn if a case addressing  a site is returned by
         OECM or DOJ for additional  work.   Credit will be reinstated upon re-referral  and will  be  based  on  the  quarter
         of re-referral.  In the event  that a case is referred in one fiscal year and  returned  to  the Region in the
         following fiscal year and credit is not withdrawn, no credit will be provided for re-referral.

         The Following are Targeted  Measures:

         (a)  Credit is given when a Region has referred to OECM or DOJ,  with or without settlement,  a civil action
              addressing a site  under Section 107 (only)  of CERCLA for any combination of the following: Removal,  ERA,
              IRM, Rl/FS, RD (Pre-RA site  work).

         (b)  Credit is given when a  Region has referred to OECM or DOJ,  with or without settlement, a civil action

                                                                                                  OSWER - 9
                                                                                                 12/89

-------
                                       OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                          FY 1990
                                             Superfund Enforcement  Definitions
               addressing a site under Section  107  (only)  of CERCLA for a
               previous Fund financed site work (i.e. Removal,  RI/FS,  RD).

          Tne Followincr are Reoortina Measures  onlv:
Remedial Action (RA)  response,  plus any other
          (c)   Credit is given when a Region has referred to OECM or DOT, with or without settlement, a civil action
               addressing a site under Section 106/107 of CERCLA  for any combination of the following: Removal, ERA, IRM,
               RI/FS, or RD.

          (d)   Credit is given when a Region has referred to OECM or DOJ, with or without settlement, a civil action
               addressing a site under Sections 106/107 of CERCLA for Remedial Action (RA) response plus any other
               previous Fund financed site work (i.e. Removal, RI/FS, RD).

S/E-3    Cost  Recovery Achieved

         Tnis  is  the sum of all cost recovery achieved.  This includes: 1) litigation (upon entry of a judgement),  2)
         settlement  (upon referral of a Consent Decree by the Region to HQ or DOJ),  3)  Administrative Orders (upon
         execution of last signature by EPA or the PRP),  4) Administrative Settlements,  5)  bankruptcy settlements (upon
         payment), 6)  recovery of oversight costs (upon billing), credit is given for the amount shown in CERCLIS.   TTiis
         is a  reporting measure only.

S/E-4*   Section  106 or 106/107 Referrals or Unilateral Orders for RD/RA

         Credit for  site referrals in categories (a)  and (b)  is based on the Regional Administrator's signature date on
         the referral  transmittal letter to the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring (OECM)  of the  Department
         of Justice  (DOJ)  as recorded in CERCLIS.   If a Unilateral Administrative Order  (UAO)  issued at a site under
         category (c)  is in compliance (as recorded in CERCLIS)  credit will also be  provided  in category  (b).   Credit
         for the  issuance of a  UAO at  a site is based on the Regional  Administrator's signature date on the order  (not
         the effective date), as recorded in CERCLIS.   In addition,  credit will  be withdrawn  if a case  addressing a  site
         is returned by  OECM or DOJ for additional  work.   Credit will  be reinstated  upon  re-referral and  will  be based
         on the quarter  of re-referral.   In the event that a case is referred in one fiscal year and returned  to the
         Region in the following fiscal  year and credit is not withdrawn,  no credit  will  be provided for  re-referral.
                                                                                                  OSWER - 10

                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                      OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                         FY 1990
                                            Superfund Enforcement Definitions


         The Following  are Targeted Measures:
         Target sites in all three categories.  Should a targeted site in category (a) reach a settlement (Consent
         Decree) prior  to referral without settlement,  the target for category (a) will automatically be decreased by
         one, while the target for category (b) will automatically be increased by one.  Should a targeted site in
         category  (b) fail to reach a settlement (Consent Decree),  and the Region refers the site (without settlement)
         per category (a), then the target for" category (a) will automatically increase by one, while the target for
         category  (b) will automatically decrease by one.

         (a)  Sites with:  Section 106 or Section 106/107 Referrals without settlement for RD and/or RA,  transmitted to
              Headquarters or to DOT.  These referrals must seek injunctive relief for FRP response at a site.   Sites
              addressed for  preliminary relief or penalties do not count toward this target.

         (b)  Sites with:  Section 106 or Section 106/107 Referrals, with settlement (Consent Decree)  for RD and/or RA
              transmitted to HQ or DQJ for judicial cx>ncurrence.  In addition, credit will be given for those Unilateral
              Administrative Orders (UAO)  at sites where the PRP is in compliance, and will be based on the order date.
              Should the PRP become substantially out of compliance with the UAO, credit will be withdrawn from this
              category  and will be reinstated only when the FRP returns to compliance or will be counted in category (a)
              only upon a referral to DOJ or OEOM.

         (c)  Sites where Unilateral Administrative Orders are issued for RD and/or RA.  The orders must compel the PRPs
              to initiate site work (i.e.  not just for site access).  This category counts all orders issued at sites,
              not just  those in compliance.

For All Facilities listed on the Federal Facilities Docket

S/E-5*   Interagencv Agreements Signed,  at NPL or Proposed NPL Facilities for RI. FS.  RD.  RA or RD/RA(s)  Only

         A site can only receive credit once under this measure.  Credit is given for the following when recorded and
         documented in  CERCIIS:
              - A signed Interagency Agreement for a RI/FS/RD/RA or RD/RA,
              - Issuance of  JJection 3008(h)  Corrective Action Order, **
              - Referral  of  a Section 106 Administrative Order to DOJ for concurrence,
              - Issuaiwv (it  a KCRA i>ernut atidrossinq all releases and all CERCLA requirements ** or
              - A lot mil  tfl«'tt.il  IMS been iuui<> to AA-GS"WKK for dispute resolution.  **

         ** Not currently  tracked in CERCLJS
                                                                                                  OSWER - 11
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
Make final RCRA permit
determination by the
statutory deadlines.
 OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
                    FY 1990
                RCRA Permitting

                        MEASURE
Permitting Measures  (Report the following for a)  land
disposal,  b)  incineration,  c)  storage and treatment.)

Public notice of draft RCRA permit issued._/

Notice of  intent to deny RCRA permit issued._/

Notice of  availability of closure plan issued._/

RCRA operating permit  issued. +_/

RCRA operating permit  denied. +_/

Closure plan  approved. *_/

RCRA post-closure permit issued._/
                                   +  This measure requires Regional target for
                                      incinerator; and storage and treatment facilities.

                                   *  This measure requires Regional target for incinerator
                                      and land disposal facilities.

                                    / (Definitions at end of program measures.
OOCE   FREQUOTV
                                                                                                 R/c-i(a)

                                                                                                 R/C-l(b)

                                                                                                 R/C-l(c)

                                                                                                 R/C-l(e)

                                                                                                 R/C-l(f)

                                                                                                 R/C-l(g)

                                                                                                 R/C-l(h)
        Q 1,2,3,4
        By Region
        Q 1,2,3,4
        By Region
        Q 1,2,3,4
        By Region
        Q 1,2,3,4
        By Region
        Q 1,2,3,4
        By Region
        Q 1,2,3,4
        By Region
        Q 1,2,3,4
        By Region
                                                                                                OSWER - 12

                                                                                                12/89	

-------
          OBJECTIVE
 OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                   FY  1990
               RCRA Permitting

                       MEASURE
SFMS OOCE   FREQUENCY
Modify permits to
expanded capacity and
protection of ground water
and other  environmental
media.
Make decisions on  requests
for waivers  from
regulations.
permit Modification Measures _/ (Report following
information for all facilities.)

Number of- significant permit modifications issued year
to date.

Number of significant permit modifications denied year
to date.
Waiver Requests

Number of waiver requests granted year to date.

Number of waiver requests denied year to date.
                                        Definitions at end of program measures
 R/C-2(a)


 R/C-2 (b)
 R/C-3(a)

 R/C-3(b)
                                                                                                OSWER - 13

                                                                                                12/89
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

-------
                                      OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                         FY 1990
                                               RCRA PERMITTING DEFINITIONS


 Public notice of draft RCRA permit issued:  The date the public notice of draft permit  is  issued.

 Notice of intent to dav RCRA permit issued;  1t*e date the public notice of intent to deny  a RCRA permit is issued.

 Notice of availability of closure plan issued;  The date the public notice is issued.

 RCRA operating permit issued;  The figf** the RCRA permit is jggu
-------
         OBJECTIVE
 OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                   FY  1990
               RCRA Enforcement

                 MEASURE	
                                                                                                    SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Improved compliance of hazardous
waste handling with RCRA
requirements.
 Ensure that timely and appro-
 priate Enforcement action is
 taken against SNC's.
Inspections

Target and report, year-to-date, the number of Land Disposal
facilities that have received an inspection in FY90.
(Combined- EPA/State target).  J

Target and report, year-to-date, the number of
treatment or storage facilities, other than land disposal
facilities, that have received an inspection in FY90.
(Combined EPA/State target).  J

Target and report, year-to-date, the number of Federal,
State, and local government TSDs (including Land Disposal)
that received an inspection in FY90. (Combined EPA/State
target) J

Significant Noncompliance - Snapshot

Report the number of TSD facilities  (including Federal
facilities) in SNC at this  point in time. J

Of the TSD facilities in R/E-2 (a), report the number of TSD
facilities that have been addressed by a formal enforcement
action, but have not returned to physical compliance. J

Of the TSD facilities in R/E-2 (a), report the number of TSD
facilities in SNC that have not had a formal enforcement
action (to resolve all violations causing the facility to
be in SNC) within 135 days  of the inspection. J
                                       /  Detmition at end of program measures.
                                      *  'Hiis measure requires Regional targets.
R/E-l(a)*
                                                                                                    R/E-l(b)*
                                                                                                    R/E-l(c)*
R/E-2(a)
                                                                                                    R/E-2(b)
                                                                                                    R/E-2(c)
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region
                                                                                                   OSWER

                                                                                                   12/89
                                                                     15

-------
              OBJECTIVE
   OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                      FY 1990
                 RCRA Enforcement

                           MEASURE
 SPMS  OOCE    FREQUENCY
 Ensure compliance by Federal
 Facilities.
Ensure that violators of the
Land Disposal Restrictions are
returned to compliance.
 Federal Facilities - Snapshot

 Report the number of Federally owned or operated TSD
 facilities that are in SNC,  at this point-in-time. _/

 Report the number of Federal TSD facilities in SNC which
 have been addressed with one or more appropriate initial
 enforcement action(s)  for all SNC violations, but have not
 returned to compliance.  _/

 Report the number of Federal TSD facilities in SNC which have
 not had an initial formal enforcement action (to resolve all
 violations causing the facility to be in SNC) within 135 days
 of the inspection.  _/

 For those Federal facilities where EPA has  the enforcement
 lead,  report the number of facilities where the final EPA
 regional  action has been completed within 120 days of the
 initial action  addressing all violations causing the
 facility  to be  in SNC. _/

 Land Disposal Restrictions Noncoroplianoe -  Snapshot

Report the  number of generators generating  over 1000kg of
waste  that  receive a Land Ban inspection in FY90. J

Report the  number of generators that  are classified as
HPVs due  to Land  Ban violations. _/
                                          [*.-{ imlions at end of program measures.
                                                                                                    R/E-3(a)


                                                                                                    R/E-3(b)




                                                                                                    R/E-3(c)




                                                                                                    R/E-3(d)
R/E-4(a)


R/E-4(b)
           Q  1,2,3,4
           By Region

           Q  1,2,3,4
           By Region
           Q 1,2,3,4
           By Region
           Q 1,2,3,4
           By Region
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
                                                                                                   OSWER - 16

                                                                                                   12/RQ

-------
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                   FY  1990
              RCRA Enforcement
OBJECTIVE MEASURE SWS OOCE FRBCUD«a
'l*a provide a measure of
enforcement activity across
all media.











Enforcement Actions

Report the number of formal administrative actions
issued, year-to-date, not including Sections 3008 (h),
3013, and 7003. (Report EPA and State separately.)
Report the number of formal administrative
enforcement actions issued, year-to-date, not
including Sections 3008 (h), 3013, and 7003.
(Report EPA and State combined.)
Report the number of State civil and criminal cases
filed against Subtitle C handlers.
Note: EPA civil referals will be taken from the
OECM docket system. EPA criminal actions
will be tracked by NEIC.


R/E-5(a)



R/E-5(b)


R/E-5(C)






Q 1/2,3,4
By Region


Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region



                                                            OSWER - 17
                                                            12/89

-------
                                      OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                        FY  1990
                                              RCRA Enforcement Definitions

 R/E-l(a)    Inspections:  All  operating and 50% of the closed Land Disposal Facilities (except Class I LTIC wells, clean
            closed and delisted facilities) must be inspected in FY 1990.  Once inspected in FY 1990, a facility
            should not be recounted in this category.  This measure is intended to evaluate whether these facilities
            have been addressed with a full compliance inspection under RCRA Sections 3007 (c), (d) and (e).
            (Includes Federal,  State and local facilities.)
            Inspections to be counted are Compliance Evaluation Inspections (CEIs).

 R/E-l(b)    Inspections:  All Treatment and Storage Facilities (TSFs) owned/operated by Federal/State/local entities,
            and all incinerators (in FY90, we expect all incinerators to be permitted), must be inspected in FY 1990.
            In addition, inspections mist be conducted at TSFs not inspected in FY89.
            Inspections to be counted are Compliance Evaluation Inspections.

 R/E-l(c)    Federal,  State and local TSDs:  These numbers are a subset of the numbers targeted and reported
            in (a)  and (b).   Thus,  Federal, State and local facilities are counted both in (c) and in (a)  or (b).
            State inspections of State and Local facilities will not be counted toward this target.

 R/E-2(a)    SNCs identified during FY90 will be those TSD facilities (including Federal Facilities) that are classified
            High Priority Violators (HPVs) according to the revised Enforcement Response Policy (ERP).   These facilities
            are indicated on the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Log.  Note: Included are those TSD facilities
            that are  designated HPVs because of Land Disposal restriction violations.
        *   For the definition of formal enforcement at Federal Facilities, see measure R/E-3.

R/E-2(b)    Formal  enforcement  actions include Section 3008(a) complaints, or equivalent State orders,  as well as
            referrals for judicial  action (including criminal) made to the Department of Justice (DOJ),  State
            Attorney  General (AG),  or other appropriate official. Both administrative orders and judicial  referrals will
            count as  a formal enforcement action addressing a SNC.
                                                                                                  OSWER - 18
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                     OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                        FY 1990
                                             RCRA Enforcement Definitions


R/E-3(a)   SNCs identified during FY90 will  be those Federal Facilities that are classified HWs according
           to the revised ERP.

R/E-3(b)   Appropriate Enforcement action for a State is a formal Enforcement response  as defined under
           R/E-2(a).  Appropriate Enforcement response for EPA is a Notice of Noncompliance to the Federal
           agency or a 3008(a) complaint to  the contract operator of a government owned facility.

R/E-3(d)   Final regional action is a Federal Facility Compliance Agreement (FFCA); or  a referral of the
           oustanding compliance issues to the AA,  OSWER for resolution in accordance with the March 24, 1988
           Elevation Policy; or  a final order with the contract operator of a government owned facility; or a
           formal regional determination that the  facility returned to compliance within 90 days of issuance of
           the Notice of  Noncompliance,  and  therefore, the FFCA or elevation of unresolved compliance issues is
           not required.,

R/E-4(a)   Applies only to generators generating over 1000KG of waste.   The types of inspections that are to be
           reported under this measure are:  Compliance Evaluation Inspections (CEI), sampling inspections, and
           other inspections that include a  land ban check list.

R/E-4(b)   Refer to the ERP guidelines and Land Disposal restrictions guidance for designating generators as HPVs.
                                                                                                 OSWER - 19

                                                                                                 12/89

-------
   OBJECTIVE
   OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                     FY  1990
              RCRA Corrective Action

  	MEASURE
                                                                                                SPMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Ensure that TSD facilities
with releases take appropriate
corrective action  under either
the permitting  or  enforcement
programs.
RCRA Facility Assessment - Report the number of facilities
where the RCRA Facility Assessment or CERCLA Site
Investigation  has been completed. _/
                                    RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI)  Inposed - Target
                                    environmentally significant facilities for issuance of
                                    formal  enforcement,orders,  or permits,  requiring RCRA
                                    Facility Investigations (RFIs).  _J
                                    (Targets are subject to negotiation between
                                    Regions and HQ.)

                                    RFI  Workplan Approved or Notice  of Deficiency. _/

                                    Interim Measures -   Report  when  interim measures are
                                    required of a owner/operator.  __/

                                    RCRA Corrective Action Remedy Selected  - Report the number
                                    of facilities where  a corrective action remedy has been
                                    selected or determination made.  _/

                                    Corrective  Action Design Approved  - Report the number of
                                    facilities  where a corrective action design has been
                                    approved by EPA or an authorized state. _/

                                    Establish the number of  facilities which have an ongoing
                                   RFI, CMS  or CMI at the beginning of FY  90.  Report the
                                   Corrective  Action oversight inspections at these
                                   during FY90.

                                     /  Definition at end ot program measures.
                                    *   '111is measure requires Regional targets
R/J-1
                                                                R/J-2*
                                                                R/J-3

                                                                R/J-4


                                                                R/J-5



                                                                R/J-6



                                                                R/J-7
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region

            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region
           Q  1,2,3,4
           By Region
           Q 1,2,3,4
           By Region
                                                                                                       OSWER -  20

                                                                                                       12/89

-------
                                      OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                         FY 1990
                                           RCRA Corrective Action Definitions


R/J-1       Report the number  of RCRA Facility Assessments (RFAs)  completed or the Site Investigation  is done.  Date the,
           Director  approves the result of the RFA.  This can be the date the Director signs a letter notifying the
           facility  whether a  RFI will or will not be necessary.

R/J-2*     RFI  Imposed.  Formal enforcement orders include 3008(h)  orders,  State equivalent orders, Section 3013
           orders, Section 7003 orders, CERCLA Sections  104  and  106,  or judicial decrees or court orders that require
           RCRA Facility Investigations (RFIs)  at RCRA facilities.   Permits include operating and post-closure permits.
           In seme cases permit modifications of earlier State issued permits will count if the modification requires
           a RFI.  Targets will be set through negotiations between Headquarters (HQ)  and the Regions.

R/J-3       Report the number  of RFI  workplans approved or Notices of Deficiencies issued.   Letter from the State or EPA
           approving or  rejecting the RFI plan prepared  by a facility in response to  an order,  permit or permit
           modification  with a schedule of compliance imposing an RFI obligation upon  the facility.

R/J-4      These are remedial  activities required of an O/O to: abate, minimize, stabilize,  mitigate,  or eliminate
           a release(s)  or threat of  a release that is  initiated  prior to selection of a final remedy, and is
           specified in  a permit or enforcement order.

R/J-5      Permit, permit modification,  or enforcement  order specifying the corrective measures remedy for a facility or
           a letter  from the Director to the facility  O/O approving the corrective measures remedy selected by the
           facility  in response to a permit, permit modification,  or enforcement order requiring the  facility to select
           a remedy  or a decision based on the results  of an RFI  that further corrective measures are  not necessary.

R/J-6      The  action by which the State or EPA approves the corrective measures design.

R/J-7      During FY 1990,  each TSD facility with an on-going corrective action (i.e.  RFI Workplan Approved)
           should receive at least one site visit.   This visit will be aimed at overseeing at least one of
           the  following activities:  well drilling,  sampling, treatment,  and/or removal activities.  The inspection
           types that count are:  CEI,  CME,  Sampling Inspections,  and follow-up evaluations with Corrective Action
           compliance schedule reviews.
                                                                                                       OSWER - 21

                                                                                                       12/89

-------
                             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                FY 1990
                        Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Enforcement
OBJECTIVE
           MEASURE
 SPMS CODE
 FREQUENCY
Develop the enforce-
ment program for
Sections 302, 303,
304, 311, and 312
Report the  number  of:
a) Investigations  of  possible  violations
   of Section  304.
b) Investigations  of  possible  Sections  302,
   303, 311, or  312 violations (do  not
   include "if  in (a)) .

Report the  number  of:
a) Section  304 violations  identified
b) Facilities determined by  the Region  or
   State  (and reported  to  the  Region) to
   be in violation of Sections 302, 303,
   311, or  312 (do not  include if in  (a)).

Report the number of
a) Administrative Orders
b) Judicial referrals and
c) State orders  regarding  violations  of
   Sections 302, 303, 304, 311, and 312

Report the number of violators where:
a) informal or
b) formal enforcement actions  by EPA  or
   State have resulted  in  non-compliers
   returning to  compliance.
C/E-1
                                                                       C/E-2
                                                                       C/E-3
                                                                       C/E-4
                                                                         OSWER -22

                                                                         12/89
Ql,2,3,4
By State
              Ql,2,3,4
              By State
              Ql,2,3,4
              By State
              Ql,2,3,4
              By  State

-------
                             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                FY  1990
                Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Enforcement Definitions


Investigations include in-house review of documents,  including  CERCLA Section 104
information requests and Accidental Release  Information  Program Surveys and field
evaluations.

State includes formal actions taken by SERC,  administering State Agency or local
committees to bring violator into  compliance.
                                                                             OSWER - 23

                                                                             12/89

-------
       OBJECTIVE
                             OFFICE  OF  SOLID WASTE  AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                 FY1990
                          Chemical Emergency Preparedness  and  Prevention Program
              MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
To  improve  State/
local  chemical
emergency
preparedness  and
enhance their
response
capabilities.
To obtain infor-
mation about the
causes of chemical
accidents, safety,
and prevention
measures taken by
facilities as a
result of accidents
Report on the status of Title  III
implementation  in each of  your States
through completion of the  Title  III
State Status Report.

Report and describe technical  assistance
activities in which EPA conducted, sponsored,
assisted in developing, or participated.

Report on number of exercises  in which EPA
provided assistance to or  participated in to
test a Federal, State, or  local plan.

Report number of Accidental Release
Information Program (ARIP) questionnaires
sent to facilities having  releases.

Report on number of chemical safety audits
conducted.
                          *This measure  requires  Regional  targets.
   CEP-1*
   CEP-2*
                                                                             CEP-3*
   CEP-4
   CEP-5*
    Q2,4
    By Region
    01,2,3,4
    By Region
                  Ql,2,3,4
                  By Region
    Ql,2,3,4
    By  Region
    Ql,2,3,4
    By  Region
                                                                           OSWER - 24

-------
                             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                FY 1990
                                           CEPP DEFINITIONS


SIMULATION EXERCISES  are  table-top or full-field  exercises conducted to test or
evaluate contingency  plan.   Regions are  expected  to  provide technical or
programmatic assistance to  other federal agencies, States  or communities to develop
the exercise and/or to actively  participate  in the exercise (e.g., exercise leader,
evaluator, facilitator).  Exercise development should include EPA  involvement
throughout the planning process  for the  exercise.  Providing a copy of guidance
material does not constitute fulfillment of  this  requirement.   The Region must write
a post-exercise report describing the assistance  provided  and/or participation in the
exercise and the outcome  of the  exercise.  This report should be held in the Regional
office and made available for Regional Reviews.   Regional  assistance or participation
in testing an internal EPA  plan  will  not count towards meeting this measure.

TITLE T_II^_STATE STATUS REPORT is the  questionnaire developed to answer a range of
questions on the status of  Title III  in  each State,  including Local Emergency Planning
Committee plan submissions,  reporting compliance  under Title III, Title III State
legislation, State Emergency Response Commission  funding and staffing, etc.  The format
for this report was originally distributed to  each Region  in October 1988 and will
continue to be supplied by  Headquarters.  If a State in a  Region does not provide
the information in the Title III State Status  Report, a Region can meet this measure
by reporting on the State information available to the Region and providing a summary
of State status and progress in  Title III implementation.   The word "State" in this
measure refers to each State and territory in  the Region.

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE  is the provision of expertise to improve preparedness and prevention
capabilities and programs.   It includes  both programmatic  and scientific assistance.   This
assistance might be delivered through direct consultation  (in the  field with the  recipient)
                                                                               OSWER - 25

                                                                               12/89

-------
                             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND  EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                FY 1990
                                           CEPP DEFINITIONS


 It  does  not  include formal training courses  or the provision of equipment.

 This  assistance  includes,  but  is not limited to:
      assistance  in organizing,  developing, and implementing preparedness,
      prevention,  or community  right-to-know  programs and activities;
      assistance  in organizing  and conducting CEPP-related workshops;
      assistance  in development and review of emergency plans (including hazards  analysis);
      assistance  in information management or risk communication;
      assistance  in development of haz-mat teams;
      assistance  in dispersion  modeling  and air monitoring;
      assistance  in evaluation  or installation  of  alarm/alerting systems

ACCIDENTAL RELEASE INFORMATION PROGRAM  is designed to accomplish two basic objectives:

         a)  To  focus high-level management  attention on facilities having repeated or
           •serious' releases,  which  may stimulate them to undertake prevention  initiatives
           on their own; and
         b)  To  provide EPA with accurate information on the causes of releases  and the
           activities currently underway in  the private sector  to prevent them from
           occurring.

TRIGGERED RELEASES

         ARIP is  focusing  on  releases which are  'serious.'   Currently, the  criteria  or  triggers
         being utilized to identify  'serious1  releases  are:

         o Starting  with the fourth  release  and ending  with  the tenth release in a twelve-month
         period.
         o A release greater than  1,000  Ibs. for  hazardous substances having RQs = 1,  10, or
         100 Ibs. or a release  of  10,000 Ibs.  for hazardous  substances having RQs = 1,000 or
         5,000 Ibs.
         o Any release resulting in death, injury, or severe environmental damage.
         o A release of an  extremely  hazardous substance  above  the RQ.



                                                                             OSWER - 26
                                                                             12/89

-------
                             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                FY 1990
                                           CEPP DEFINITIONS
LETTERS/QUESTIONNAIRES
Once a facility  has  Met a trigger,  the Region is required to draft a letter combining the
authorities of CERCLA,  SARA,  CAA,  CWA, & RCRA,  send it to the plant manager,  along with the
questionnaire EPA has developed.   A copy of the response must be sent to  Headquarters.

ON-SITE CHEMICAL AUDIT  is an  on-site inspection of the entire process/handling operations at
a site from a safety standpoint.   It is an audit of safety procedures,  facility equipment, training
and contingency  planning,  as  well  as management commitment.
                                                                             OSWER - 27

                                                                             12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
 OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                    FY 1990
          Underground Storage Tanks

                        MEASURE
SFMS CODE   FREQUENCY
Support development of,  and
review and decide on,  UST
state program applications,
in order to both encourage
state-run programs and
ensure adequate  national
consistency.
Promote the cleanup of
pollution resulting from
leaking underground storage
tanks.
State  Program Approval  (UST-1)

Report on the following by Region:

Number of states  submitting ocmplete applications for
state  program approval.

Number of states  with authorized programs.


Cleanup Leaking USTs  (UST-2)

Report on the following by Region:

Number of sites cleanups for petroleum releases
initiated, by either responsible parties or states
(Report separately for  responsible party lead, state
lead with Trust Fund money,  and  state lead with no Trust
Fund money).

Number of petroleum releases under control, by either
responsible parties or  states  (Report separately for
responsible party lead,  state lead with Trust Fund
money, and state  lead with no Trust Fund money).

Numbt ' of site cleanups  for petroleum releases
oompl ited, by either responsible parties or states
(Report separately for responsible party lead, state
lead with Trust Fund money,  and  state lead with no Trust
Fund money) .


* This measure requires  regional targets.	
 UST-
 l(a)*
                                                                                                  UST-1(b)
                                                                                                 UST-2(a)
                                                                                                 UST-2(b)
                                                                                                 UST-2(c)
                                                                                                OSWER - 28
                                                                                                12/89
Q 1,2,3,4
By Region

Q 1,2,3,4
By Region
             Q 1,2,3,4
             By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region
            Q 1,2,3,4
            By Region

-------
          OBJECTIVE
 OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                   FY  1990
          Underground Storage Tanks

                       MEASURE
Encourage compliance with
the UST regulations during
the transition period.
SIMS CODE   FREQUENCY
                              Prevention Program (UST-3)

Report on the following by Region:

Number of states with formal agreements to implement the
federal UST program during the transition period.
                                                                                                 UST-3
             Q 1,2,3,4
             By Region
                                                                                               OSWER - 29

                                                                                               12/89

-------
                                       OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                          FY 1990
                                                 UST PROGRAM DEFINITIONS


 (2) (b)   Number of petroleum releases under control, by  either responsible parties or states  (Report separately for
          responsible party lead, state lead with Trust Fund money, and  state lead with no Trust Fund money): means total
          number of petroleum releases from an UST at which the state or responsible party under state supervision has
          performed Ali of the following tasks:  1)  stopping the  flow of free product into the environment; 2) mitigating
          any fire and safety hazards (e.g., abating dangerous  levels of fumes in basements of homes and other effected
          buildings);  3) managing contaminated soils as  directed by the state;  4) determining the presence of free
          product floating on the water table and beginning removal of it according to a plan submitted to the state; and
          5) determining whether drinking water supplies  are contaminated and assuring that alternative supplies of
          potable water are available when the state determines that the water supplies should not be used.  Report
          responsible party lead, state lead with Trust Fund money, and  state lead with no Trust Fund money cleanups
          separately.  This measure includes all releases under control  by a state, whether involving federal funds under
          a LUST Trust Fund cooperative agreement or involving  only state funds.  (This is a cumulative measure.  The
          number in the first guarter of FY 1990 should include those sites with action completed in FY 1987,  FY 1988,
          and FY 1989.)

 (2) (c)    Number of site cleanups for petroleum releases completed, by either responsible parties or states {Report
          separately for responsible party lead, state lead with Trust Fund money,  and state lead with no Trust Fund
          money):   means the total number of specific sites of a petroleum release from an UST at which the state has
          determined that no further cleanup actions are necessary at the site.   Report responsible party lead,  state
          lead with Trust Fund money, and state lead with no Trust Fund money cleanups separately.   This measure includes
          all cleanups completed by a state,  whether involving federal funds under a LUST Trust Fund cooperative
          agreement or involving only state funds.    (This is a cumulative measure.   The number in the first quarter of FY
          1990 should include those site with cleanups completed prior to FY 1990.)

UST-3:    IMPLEMENTATION OF FEDERAL UST PREVENTION PROGRAM

(3)       Number of states with formal agreements to implement the federal UST program during the transition period:
          means  that the state  has entered into a formal  agreement with the Regional Administrator to implement  part or
          all the  federal  UST program during  the transition period.  These "formal  agreements may be included  in (1) LUST
          Trust  Fund cooperative  agreement and/or state program grant  workplans,  (2) separate MOAs,  or (3) a combination
          of  the above.  The  "transition period" is  the time between the date  the federal UST regulations are effective
          and the dates  state programs are approved  to operate in  lieu of the  federal  program.  The length of the
          transition period will  vary by state.   (Quarters 2, 3, & 4 are reported cumulatively.)
                                                                                                  OSWER - 30
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                      OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
                                                         FY 1990
                                                 UST PROGRAM DEFINITIONS
UST-1:   STATE PROGRAM APFHQVAL

(1) (a)   Number of states  submitting complete applications for state program approval;   means that the state has
         submitted an  application for program approval and that the Region has determined that the application  is
         "complete"  in accordance with the application components required by the regulations.   Information reported
         should indicate whether the state application is for a partial program (either petroleum or chemical USTs) or a
         complete program  (both petroleum and chemicals USTs).  This measure requires regional targets.   (Quarters 2,  3,
         & 4 are reported  cumulatively.)

(1) (b)   Number of states  with  authorized programs:   means that the state program has been approved by the Regional
         Administrator according to the regulations to operate in lieu of the federal program.   This measure includes
         interim authorizations.   Information reported should indicate whether the state program authorization  is for  a
         partial program (either petroleum or chemical USTs)  or a ocnplete program (both petroleum and chemical USTs).
         (Quarters 2,  3, & 4 are reported cumulatively.)

UST-2:   CLEANUP LEAKING USTs

(2) (a)   Number of site cleanups for petroleum releases initiated,  by either responsible parties or states (Report
         separately  for responsible partvlead^ state lead with Trust Fund money,  and state lead with  no Trust  Fund
         money):  means the total number of specific sites at which the state or responsible party under its supervision
         has initiated management of petroleum-contaminated soil,  Ojl removal of free petroleum product, OR management or
         treatment of  dissolved petroleum contamiration caused by a release from an UST.   Site investigations and
         emergency responses do not quality as cleanup actions.  Report responsible-party lead,  state  lead with Trust
         Fund money, and state  lead with no Trust Fund money cleanups separately.   This measure includes all cleanups
         initiated by  a state,  whether involving federal funds under a LUST Trust Fund  cooperative agreement or
         involving only state funds.   (This is a cumulative measure.   The number in the first quarter  of FY 1990 should
         include those sites with actions initiated  in FY 1987, FY 1988,  and FY 1989.)
                                                                                                  OSWER - 31
                                                                                                  12/89

-------
                       OSWER
               SUPERFUND SITE INSPECTIONS COMPLETED
               	(S/F-1)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
26
0
35
88
57
22
15
9
20
10
282
52
50
70
187
135
44
30
18
40
20
646
91
80
110
286
252
77
52
31
79
35
1093
130
220
150
390
370
110
75
45
120
50
1660
                                                                                OSWER -
                                                                                12/89
                                                                      32

-------
                       OSWER
               NUMBER OF NPL SITES WITH A REMOVAL	
               ACTION OR RI/FS START(PRP & FUND)(S/C-2)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
1
0
4
1
1
0
0
2
2
12
3
7
3
10
8
3
2
1
2
4
43
9
13
9
16
14
8
5
3
10
7
94
16
19
16
23
20
13
9
5
18
10
149
                                                                                OSWER -  33
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 11   NUMBER OF REMEDIES SELECTED AT NPL SITES
                                   CPRP AND FUND)	rS/C-3)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
2
3
3
5
3
0
0
4
1
1
22
5
18
9
14
13
0
0
4
1
1
65
10
27
15
19
28
1
2
5
7
3
117
12
29
29
22
39
7
9
8
18
4
177
                                                                                OSWER -
                                                                                12/89
                                                                       34

-------
                       OSWER  15   NPL SITES WHERE  REMEDIAL  DESIGN	
                                  ACTIVITY STARTED (PRP AND FUND)   (S/C-4)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
3
6
3
1
6
0
1
0
0
1
21
3
16
8
5
18
2
3
1
3
2
61
9
25
16
8
28
2
6
1
7
4
106
12
31
19
20
35
5
7
4
15
6
154
                                                                                OSWER  -
                                                                                12/89
                                                                       35

-------
                       OSWER 19   REMEDIAL ACTION ACTIVITIES STARTED	
                                  (PRP AND FUND)	(S/C-5)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
5
1
2
1
1
0
0
2
2
15
3
8
1
2
5
2
0
0
2
3
26
5
12
1
9
8
2
1
2
2
3
45
6
16
3
9
10
2
3
4
2
4
59
                                                                                OSWER -
                                                                                12/89
                                                                       36

-------
                       OSWER  22    COMPLETION  OF ALL REMEDIAL/REMOVAL	
                                   IMPLMTAT'N-NPL  SITES(PRP &  FUND)  fS/C-6)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
5
3
4
0
0
0
0
12
                                                                                 OSWER -
                                                                                 12/89
                                                                       37

-------
                       OSWER 27   107 SITE REFERRALS FOR PRE-REMEDIAL
                                  ACTIONS >= 200.000	fS/E-2A)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
1
0
1
6
0
1
0
0
1
10
0
3
2
1
9
0
2
2
0
1
20
3
5
2
3
11
1
2
3
0
2
32
4
6
4
3
13
2
2
4
2
2
42
                                                                                OSWER -
                                                                                12/89
                                                                       38

-------
                       OSWER 28
               107 SITE REFERRALS FOR REMEDIAL
                                  ACTIONS >= 200.000
                                              (S/E-2B)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
1
7
4
1
0
5
5
2
0
2
1
2
22
4
1
4
5
5
3
0
2
1
2
27
                                                                                OSWER -
                                                                                12/89
                                                                       39

-------
                       OSWER 32   106 CIVIL REFERRALS  FOR RD/RA WITHOUT
                                  SETTLEMENT	(S/E-4A)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
                                                                                OSWER -
                                                                                12/89
                                                                       40

-------
                       OSWER  33    106  CIVIL REFERRALS  FOR RD/RA  WITH	
                                   SETTLEMENT	(S/E-4B)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
6
2
7
5
1
5
3
1
0
1
1
26
5
12
8
6
7
6
2
0
4
4
54
6
13
11
12
12
6
4
4
8
5
81
                                                                                 OSWER -
                                                                                 12/89
                                                                      41

-------
                       OSWER 34   SITES ISSUED RD/RA UNILATERAL
                                  ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS	
                                               (S/E-4C)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
2
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
4
4
4
7
0
0
0
1
0
21
3
6
5
6
8
1
1
1
5
1
37
                                                                                OSWER -  42
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 37   AGREEMENTS SIGNED AT NPL FEDERAL FACIL.
                                  FOR RI/FS/RD/RA OR RD/RA	(S/E-5)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
l
0
• o
2
2
0
0
1
0
2
8
3
3
0
5
3
0
1
2
2
5
24
5
4
1
6
3
2
3
3
8
7
42
7
5
1
6
5
2
5
3
12
8
54
                                                                                OSWER -  43
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER  69   TOTAL NUMBER OF  FINAL RCRA PERMIT
                                  DETERMINATIONS	
                                                 (R/C-lE&n
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
12
15
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
11
24
0
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
0
16
35
0
0
0
0
0
51
                                                                                OSWER  -   44
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 73   INCINERATOR FINAL PERMIT DETERMINATIONS
                                  	(R/C-1E&F)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
6
3
1
2
3
3
0
0
1
19
0
6
3
1
2
4
3
0
1
1
21
0
6
3
1
2
6
3
0
2
1
24
1
6
3
1
2
6
3
0
2
1
25
                                                                                OSWER -  45
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 76   STORAGE AND TREATMENT FINAL RCRA PERMIT
                                  DETERMINATIONS	(R/C-1E&F)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
1
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
3
1
11
13
1
0
1
3
0
33
0
5
2
21
22
4
3
4
3
1
65
0
10
5
42
33
10
8
7
5
5
125
                                                                                OSWER - 46
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER  82
               LDF CLOSURE PLANS APPROVED
                                                                   (R/C-1G)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
5
5
1
1
1
0
17
1
2
3
4
9
10
2
3
1
2
37
3
5
7
6
11
15
3
5
1
4
60
                                                                                OSWER - 47
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 83   INCINERATOR CLOSURE  PLANS APPROVED	
                                         	(R/C-IG)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
5
0
2
0
2
0
1
1
2
1
1
10
0
3
0
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
14
                                                                                OSWER -  48
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 93
               RFI IMPOSED
                                                                    (R/J-2)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
3
0
0
2
1
5
0
0
0
11
1
6
2
2
10
3
7
1
0
3
35
2
13
4
5
16
5
13
2
2
4
66
3
19
10
10
25
9
19
4
4
5
108
                                                                                OSWER -  49
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER102   NUMBER OF  LDF  INSPECTIONS  YEAR-TO-DATE
                                   (EPA AND STATE)	(R/E-1A)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











8
8
18
31
28
20
13
9
14
1
150
20
26
48
79
85
60
26
16
27
6
393
45
46
78
131
171
120
43
34
44
18
730
90
79
120
274
285
219
67
55
61
43
1293
                                                                                OSWER -  50
                                                                                12/89

-------
                        OSWER103    NUMBER OF TSDF INSPECTIONS (OTHER THAN
                                   LDFs)  YEAR-TO-DATE	(R/E-1B)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











10
21
26
35
39
25
30
4
20
0
210
25
67
73
85
118
50
57
11
51
7
544
52
120
120
135
237
100
90
20
85
16
975
100
213
187
265
395
145
129
30
131
34
1629
                                                                                 OSWER -   51
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                       OSWER104    INSPECTIONS OF FED.  STATE.  & LOCAL TSDs
                                   (INCLUDING LDFs)  (EPA & STATE)   (R/E-1C)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
8
7
5
6
4
5
4
4
0
43
2
17
14
20
18
10
13
8
9
3
114
10
25
22
35
37
28
22
14
25
7
225
22
34
36
80
62
56
30
20
56
36
432
                                                                                 OSWER -  52
                                                                                 12/89

-------
                        OSWER137    STATES SUBMITTING COMPLETE APPLICATIONS
                                   FOR STATE PROGRAM APPROVAL	(UST-1A)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National











0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
5
0
1
0
6
1
1
0
3
0
1
13
                                                                                  OSWER - 53
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                       OSWER 40   # OF TITLE III STATE STATUS REPORTS
                                  COMPLETED	(CEP-ll
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
56
                                                                                OSWER -  54
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 41   # OF TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES - EPA ASSISTED
                                  OR PARTICIPATED	(CEP-2)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
12
6
12
16
8
5
4
5
6
8
82
24
12
24
32
23
10
12
18
16
16
187
36
18
36
48
38
25
20
33
30
24
308
48
24
48
64
48
40
32
48
40
32
424
                                                                                OSWER -  55
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER  42    #  OF  EXERCISES  TO  TEST A PLAN  - EPA
                                  ASSISTED OR  PARTICIPATED
                                                (CEP-3)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
0
2
2
I
I
0
1
2
1
11
2
1
4
4
3
2
1
2
5
2
26
4
2
5
6
5
3
2
4
8
3
42
6
3
6
8
6
5
4
6
10
4
58
                                                                                OSWER -  56
                                                                                12/89

-------
                       OSWER 44   # OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AUDITS CONDUCTED
                                  	(CEP-5)
Region
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
19
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
29
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
40
                                                                                OSWER -  57
                                                                                12/89

-------
                            ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM

As of January  1990,  the  following OSWER projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE;
DUE DATE
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
OSWER
3
7
37
40
47
54
56
58
62
63
69
74
76
77
79
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
             LOCATION  STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES     7/ 6/92
             BURNING HAZ  WASTE IN BOILERS/INDUSTRIAL FURNACES      2/28/91
             TOXICITY  CHARACTERISTIC                               3/10/90
             SOLID WASTE  DISPOSAL FACILITY CRITERIA                2/27/90
             8002 LARGE VOLUME STUDIES - UTILITIES                 1/31/89
             LISTINGS/PETROLEUM WASTES (WWT)                        5/31/90
             LISTINGS/WOOD PRESERVING MFG. WASTES                  5/30/90
             CORRECTIVE ACTION AT SWMU'S                           3/30/90
             NATIONAL  CONTINGENCY PLAN (NCP)  REVISION              1/31/90
             HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM REVISION                        3/ 5/90
             COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW REPORTING REQUIREMENTS        2/28/90
             OIL POLLUTION PREVENTION MODIFICATIONS                1/23/91
             PROCESSING WASTE  REPORT TO CONGRESS                   1/31/91
             BEVILL PROCESSING WASTES                              1/22/90
             THIRD THIRD                                            5/ 8/90
             UST - SELF INSURANCE TEST FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT.        9/ 3/90
             FEDERALLY PERMITTED RELEASES OF HAZ. SUBSTANCES       12/14/90
             REPORTING CONTINUOUS RELEASES OF HAZ. SUBSTANCES      4/ 6/90
             CERCLA COST  RECOVERY                                  7/31/91
             STATE COMPLIANCE  MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT REGS.     1/14/91
             CHEMICAL ACCIDENT PREVENTION COMMITTEE                9/30/90
             MINING WASTE MANAGEMENT UNDER RCRA SUBTITLE D         8/31/92
             EMISSION CONTROLS FOR HAZ.  WASTE INCINERATORS         2/28/91
             NO MIGRATION VARIANCE FOR THE WIPP                    4/18/90
             NCP SUBPART  K - ROADMAP FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES       12/ 7/90
                                                                         OSWER
                                                                         12/89
            -  58

-------
Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
FY 1990 GOCMs

-------
                                        OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                                       FY 1990
                                                   Program; Pesticides
          OBJECTIVE
                    MEASURE
SIMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Protect health and the environment
from any unreasonable effects from
pesticides currently in use.
Restrict or ban the use of
pesticides posing unreasonable
effects to human  health and the
environment.
Establishment of 106 comprehensive data requirements in
data call ins.
 Publication of 11 reregistration eligibility documents or
 "other appropriate regulatory actions".

 Product specific reregistration (A determination that a
 pesticide meets the requirements of section 3(c)(5).)
 [This step doesn't take place until up to 17 months after
  the determination of eligibility for reregistration
  therefore a target has not been established for FY90.]

 Complete L2 Special Review Decisions.
   P-l
   P-2
   P-3
                                                                                                     P-4
Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4



Q 1,2,3,4
              Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                      OPTS - I
                                                                                                      12/89

-------
                                         OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                                        FY 1990~
                                                   Program:  Pesticides
            OBJECTIVE
                        MEASURE
                                                                                                  SPMS CODE
                                                                         FREQUENCY
Prevent unreasonable  risks from
pesticide active  ingredients and
products and encourage use of
safer products.
Complete final decisions on new active ingredients and
applications for registration in a timely manner and
report on the overdue active ingredients and applications.
                                       - New Active Ingredients (New Chemicals/New Biochemicals/
                                         Microbiological Reviews): 1Q
                                       -  Old Chemical Applications 1425

                                       -  Amended Registration Applications 2625

                                       -  New Uses Applications £0

                                      Complete final decision on 325 emergency
                                      exemptions*.

                                      Process £Q final decisions on tolerance petitions
                                      within quarterly targets and report on the backlog of
                                      overdue petitions*.

                                      Regional and Headquarters Measures

                                      -  Worker Protection (P-8A)
                                      -  Groundwater (P-8B)
                                      -  Endangered Species  (P-8C)

                                      * These numbers may vary based on the number of petitions
                                        and exemptions received by EPA.   OHSE will compare the
                                        number of petitions  and exemptions actually processed
                                        each quarter with the number administratively targeted
                                        to be processed.
P-5
                                                               P-5A



                                                               P-5B

                                                               P-5C

                                                               P-5D

                                                               P-6


                                                               P-7



                                                               P-8
0 1,2,3,4
          Q 1,2,3,4
         Q 1,2,3,4
          Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                                    OPTS  -  2
                                                                                                    12/89

-------
                           OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                            FY 1990

                       Program;  Toxic Substances (Headquarter Measures)
      OBJECTIVE
             MEASURE
                         SPMS  CODE
                              FREQUENCY
Review all new
chemicals, imposing
controls as
necessary to reduce
risk
Identify potential
risk of suspect
chemicals

Initiate and
promulgate actions
to reduce the risks
from hazardous
existing chemicals

Make the TRI data
base accessible to
facilitate public
access and use
Evaluate quality
of release estimates
provided by indus-
try and identify
areas where
additional guidance
or procedures are
needed
Report on the number of valid new
chemical notices received and actions
taken to reduce risk.  Annual estimate
i-s  2790  PMNs received (including
biotech and exemptions) and  170
control actions anticipated.
Report quarterly
under Section 4,
and 8(e).
on reports
5(e), 8(a),
received
 8(d),
Complete  8  existing chemicals risk
management actions (includes Section 6
rules, options selection, SNURs, and
Section 9(a) and 9(d) referrals)
Measure cumulative public use of the
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
database (i.e., hours of use).   Report
quarterly on number of TRI projects sold
by NTIS/GPO; and number of assistance
at the Title III Reporting Center.

Perform detailed, on-site audits of
randomly selected reporting
facilities to validate reported
figures.
                            T-l
T-2
                            T-3
                            T-4
                                                                     T-5
                              Q 1,2,3,4
Q 1,2,3,4
                              Q 1,2,3,4
                              Q 1,2,3,4
                                         Q  3,4
                                                                                   OPTS - 3
                                                                                     /on

-------
                           OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                            FY 1990

                         Program:  Toxic Substances (Regional Measures)
      OBJECTIVE
             MEASURE
SPMS CODE
FREQUENCY
Protect public
health and the
environment by pro-
viding assistance
in abating
hazardous asbestos
materials in schools
Identify potential
risks from emissions
by conducting
technical outreach
activities

Encourage State and
local environmental
programs and
increase public
awareness through
outreach
Conduct close-out site evaluations of
all outstanding ASHAA award projects,
particularly any remaining FY1986 and
FY1987 projects, to confirm that abate-
ment assistance was extended on
designated school projects and that
abatement was properly accomplished.
Provide current status reports on
projects where delays are expected
and where abatement has not occurred
as required by the award agreement.

Number of technical assistance or
outreach assistance workshops conducted
Number of outreach assistance workshops
or presentations conducted for or made
to government agencies and the general
public.
   T-6
   T-7
   T-i
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
(cumulative)
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
                                                                                    OPTS - 4

-------
                           OFFICE OF  PESTICIDES AND TO)
                                            FY  1990

                         Program:  Toxic Substances  (Regional Measures)
      OBJECTIVE
             MEASURE
                                                                  SPMS CODE
                                                           FREQUENCY
Protect public health
and the environment
by ensuring, through
the States,  that
properly trained and
accredited profes-
sionals are  available
to counsel school
officials and other
building managers how
to best control or
eliminate asbestos
hazards in buildings

Protect public health
and the environment
by ensuring  the
quality of asbestos
accreditation course,
which train  asbestos
management and abate-
ment professionals
for the nation's
schools and  other
buildings

Assess State PCB
Program enhancement
progress and
activities
Report on the number of approved State
or Territory Asbestos Accreditation
Programs per discipline.  Provide
progress reports on States or Territories
that have established programs in any
of the disciplines.
T-9
Report on the number of audits performed
for full approval of asbestos training
courses previously granted contingent
approval.  Provide fourth quarter
exception reports explaining why courses
in the universe were not audited for
full approval.   Report on the number of
Refresher courses audited.
Provide report on each State in the
Region describing current State PCB
programs.
T-10
T-ll
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
Q 1,2,3,4
by Regions
(cumulative)
Q 2
by Regions
                                                                                   OPTS - 5
                                                                                   12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
                           FY 1990 STARS
              OFFICE  OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

                Program Area:  Pesticide Enforcement

             	MEASURE	
                                                              SPMS CODE  FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain
high level of
compliance.
Inspections for Significant Activities and Compliance Rate    P/E - 1
Specify the cumulative number of State inspections
in the following categories identified on EPA form
5700-33H and the number of EPA inspections  (Regions 7 and 8
only) in comparable categories:**

o agricultural use and follow up
o nonagricultural use and follow up
o restricted use pesticide dealers

o  specify the cumulative number of State and EPA enforce-
   ment actions and/or proceedings in the same categories
   (above)

EPA Enforcement Actions

Specify on a cumulative basis:

o  numbers of administrative complaints issued
o  numbers of warning letters, SSUROs,  recalls,
   and import detentions
o  civil and criminal referrals (retrieved from
   OECM Docket)

 *A11 Federal data will be reported quarterly in real time.
  All State data will be reported quarterly, one quarter out
  of  phase.

**Requires quarterly targets for inspections.
                                                                              P/E - 2
                                                                       Q 1,2,3,4*
                                                                          Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                      OPTS - 6
                                                                                      12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
                           FY 1990 STARS
             OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND  TOXIC  SUBSTANCES

                Program Area:  Pesticide Enforcement

                         MEASURE
SPMS CODE .FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Significant Violator - State Primacy (Dynamic Base)*

For referrals under Section 27 designated as significant in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 40 CFR 173 (pro-
cedures governing .referrals),  specify on a cumulative basis:

o  total number of referrals
o  number of referrals pending (timeframe not elapsed)
o  number of referrals addressed within timeframe
o  number of referrals addressed beyond timeframe.

Significant Violator - EPA (Dynamic Base)*

For significant use cases and suspension/cancellation
actions referred from States to Regions or based on EPA
inspections, report on a cumulative basis:

o  total number of cases referred/identified
o  number of cases addressed
o  number of cases closed
                 *See  "Definitions."
 P/E - 3
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                 OPTS - 7
                                                                                 12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
                           FY 1990 STARS
              OFFICE  OF  PESTICIDES AND  TOXIC  SUBSTANCES

             Program  Area:   Toxic  Substances  Enforcement

            	MEASURE	
SPMS CODF  FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Inspections and Compliance Rates

o  Specify the cumulative number of EPA and State
   inspections conducted*
o  Specify the number of inspections for which case
   review is completed
o  Specify the number of inspections found-in violation

Enforcement Actions

Specify on a cumulative basis:

o  number of administrative complaints issued
o  number of notices of noncompliance issued
o  number of civil and criminal referrals  (retrieved
   from OECM Docket)

Significant Noncompliance Fixed Base** (Pre-FY 1990
open cases)

Identify the number of significant noncomplier cases
pending** issuance of enforcement action and the
number issued and still open** at the beginning of
FY 1990.   Each quarter, report on the status of
this BOY inventory:

o  number of pending cases issued
o  number of cases closed
                *  This measure requires quarterly targets.
                ** See "Definitions."
 T/E - 1
                                                                              T/E - 2
                                                                              T/E - 3
Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                    OPTS-8
                                                                                     12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
                           FY  1990  STARS
             OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC  SUBSTANCES

            Program Area:  Toxic Substances  Enforcement

                         MEASURE	
                                                                             SPMS CODE  FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
in Federal
Facilities
Significant Noncompliance - Dynamic Base* (new cases

For FY 1990 SNC cases, resulting from reviews of
FY 1990 inspections, specify on a cumulative basis:
                             *
o  number of SNC cases identified
o  number of SNC cases opened:**
   in 0 to 180 days of inspection date
   in 181 or more days of inspection date
o  number of SNC cases closed
Federal Facilities

Specify separate data on Federal Facilities for T/E-1,
T/E-3 and T/E-4, as a subset of totals.
                 *   See  "Definitions."
                 **  Regional  targets will be  required  for certain cases under
                    See  "Definitions."
T/E - 4
Q 1,2,3,4
T/E - 5
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                             this measure,
                                                                             OPTS - 9
                                                                              12/89

-------
OBJECTIVE
                           FY 1990 STARS
              OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

               Program Area:   Toxic Substances  Enforcement

                         MEASURE	
SPMS CODE  FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
for PCB
disposal and
storage
Permitted PCB Disposal Facilities and Brokers/Storage
Facilities*

Specify the number of PCB permitted disposal facilities
and PCB broker/storage facilities in the Region

Each quarter report:

o number of inspections (initial and follow-up) conducted
  at these facilities**
o number of inspection reviews completed
o number of inspections found in violation
o number of administrative complaints issued
o number of permit suspensions and revocations issued
                *  See "Definitions."
                ** Regional targets will be required for this measure
                   (subset of T/E-1 targets)
 T/E - 6
Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                         OPTS - 10
                                                                          12/89

-------
                                           FY 1990 STARS
                              OFFICE  OF  PESTICIDES  AND  TOXIC  SUBSTANCES

                      Program  Area:   Emergency  Planning/Community  Right-to-Know
OBJECTIVE
                         MEASURE
SPMS CODE  FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance
Inspections and Compliance Rates

o  Specify the cumulative number of EPA inspections
   conducted*
o  Specify the number of inspections for which case
   review is completed
o  Specify the number of inspections found in violation

Enforcement Actions

Specify on a cumulative basis:

o  number of administrative complaints issued
o  number of civil  and criminal  referrals (retrieved
   from OECM Docket)

Significant Noncompliance Fixed  Base** (Pre-FY 1990
open cases)

Identify the number of significant noncomplier cases
pending** issuance  of enforcement action and the
number issued and still open**  at the beginning of
FY 1990.  Each quarter, report  on the status of
this BOY inventory:

o  number of pending  cases issued
o  number of cases  closed
                *  This measure requires quarterly targets.
                ** See "Definitions."
 E/E - 1
                                                                              E/E  - 2
                                                                              E/E - 3
0 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
            Q 1,2,3,4
                                                                                OPTS - 11
                                                                                12/89

-------
                                           FY 1990 STARS
                              OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

                      Program Area:   Emergency Planning/Community Right-to-Know
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE  FREQUENCY
Achieve and
maintain a
high level
of compliance







Significant Noncompl i ance - Dynamic Base* (new cases)

For FY 1990 SNC cases, resulting from reviews of
FY 1990 inspections, specify on a cumulative basis:
o number of SNC cases identified
o number of SNC cases opened:**
in 0 to 180 days of inspection date
in 181 or more days of inspection date
o number of SNC cases closed
* See "Definitions."
** Regional targets will be required for this measure.
E/E - 4 Q 1,2,3,



















                                                                          OPTS - 12
                                                                          1 7/HQ

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)

Definitions of key terms and detailed quarterly  commitments for the Pesticide and Toxic
Substances Programs follow.

P-l    Establishment of comprehensive data requirements in data call ins.
                                           t
  Comprehensive data requirements will be developed  for chemicals:

  List A consists of pesticide active ingredients for which Registration Standards have been
  issued as of December 24, 1988; and the other  three lists (Lists B,  C, and D) are to include
  all other active ingredients contained in a product first registered before November 1, 1984,
  for which Registration Standards have not been issued.

  Reregistration of these chemicals will be accomplished  in the following phases:

  Phase 1:  EPA is required to publish lists of  pesticide active ingredients subject to
  reregistration and to ask registrants of pesticide products containing those active
  ingredients whether they intend to seek reregistration.

  Phase 2:  Registrants inform EPA of intent to  seek reregistration, comply with data
  requirements and pay first portions of reregistration fee.

  Phase 3:  Registrants submit required existing studies  and pay final reregistration fee.

  Phase 4:  Independent EPA review of registrant submissions and identification and call in of
  any additional data requirements.

  Phase 5:  EPA conducts reregistration review of each active ingredient and takes appropriate
  regulatory action.
                                                                                    OPTS - 13
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

  Definition;  For List A chemicals, this would be the mail out of a Data Call In  (DCI) as a
  result of the inventory.  For Lists B, C and D, this would be the Phase 4 DCI mailout.
  Indicate number of data call ins by quarter:
     FY 90
                  Ql
                   3
Q2
17
     Q3
     20
          Q4
          66
          Total
           106
P-2
Publication of reregistration eligibility document or "other appropriate regulatory
action".
  Definition:  For all lists this would be the Phase 5 determination required by Section
  4(g)(2)(A) as to whether pesticides containing a given active ingredient are eligible for
  reregistration.  For chemicals deemed eligible for reregistration, the document would be  the
  equivalent of a registration standard and would also call in product specific data.  For those
  B/C/D chemicals, and List A chemicals following the inventory based DCI, which are deemed
  ineligible there may be a range of actions from another DCI, to a referral to special review.
  Whatever the "non-eligibility" determination is it would be announced in the FR and would be a
  completion under this measure.
     FY 90 Target
                       Ql
                        0
Q2
 0
Q3
 5
Q4
 6
Total
  11
                                                                                    OPTS - 14
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

P-3    Product specific reregistration.

  Definition:  A determination that a pesticide meets the requirements of section 3(c)(5).

  FY 90 Target:  This step doesn't take place until up to 17 months after the determination of
  eligibility for reregistration so a target should not be established for FY90.  (Included here
  for completeness of understanding of process.  This will be a measure in FY 91.)
P-4
Special Review Decisions
  Indicate the number of Special Review Decisions to be made by quarter:
     FY 90 Target
                       Ql
                        2
Q2
 4
Q3
 3
Q4
 4
Total
  13
  Definition;  The nature of Special Review accomplishments keeps expanding due to the types of
  problems encountered and the Agency's resolution of them.  Major tolerance actions based on
  ADI exceedences are the equivalent of Position Documents in terms of the amount of work it
  takes to complete them, the nature of the hazard posed and the degree of public health
  protection afforded (item #5).    Major Federal Register status reports, similar to what is
  being prepared for 2,4-D, are also resource intensive and serve much the same purpose as
  Position Documents in keeping the public informed of our findings (items #6).   Thus, the
  definition of Special Review has been expanded to include the above as part of final
  resolution decisions.
                                                                                    OPTS - 15
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                    DEFINITIONS
                                   FY 1990 STARS
                     OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                           (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES  PROGRAMS)
                                     continued

Pesticide Special Review Decisions - Special Review decisions include the issuance of the
position documents listed below or the  following final resolutions:

1.   returning the chemical to the pesticide registration process
a)   after deciding not to initiate a Special  Review before a Grassley-Allen letter is
     issued
b)   after deciding not to initiate a Special  Review subsequent to the issuance of a
     Grassley-Allen letter.

2.   voluntary cancellation by the applicant,

3.   cancellation or suspension of the  Special Review by EPA, or

4.   a negotiated settlement on modifications  to the terms and conditions of the
     registration with the registrant whether  the chemical:
a)   is in Special Review, or
b)   being considered for Special Review

5.   A revocation or revision of a tolerance based on public health criteria.

6.   A major status report, published in the Federal Register, explaining the Agency's
     position on a chemical which is either in Special Review or which is being
     considered for Special Review.
                                                                             OPTS - 16
                                                                             12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

The position documents are:

  PD-1:     reviews the available scientific data and addresses whether a chemical has met or
            exceeded Special Review risk criteria (if a chemical does not exceed the criteria,
            it is typically returned to the registration  process).  A PD-1 is considered
            completed when the Federal Register  notice has been signed by the AA.

  PD-2:     promulgates the decision to cancel or suspend the Special Review process after a
            PD-1 has been issued.

  PD-2/3:   analyzes the risks and benefits of the  Special Review chemicals and any alternatives
            to the various uses of the chemical, identifies  feasible regulatory options, and
            proposes a decision.  A PD-2/3  is considered  completed when the Federal Register
            notice has been signed by the AA.

  PD-4:     reflects the Agency's final decision.   The PD-4  incorporates comments received on
            the PD-2/3 from the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel, the Department of Agriculture
            and other public responses, along with  appropriate analysis of the comments.  The
            PD-4 typically calls  for continued registration  with certain terms and conditions or
            'cancellations for some or all uses of the pesticide or pesticides.  A PD-4 is A PD-4
            is considered completed when the Federal Register notice has been signed by the  AA.
                                                                                    OPTS - 17
                                                                                    12/89

-------
PD-5
                               DEFINITIONS
                              FY 1990 STARS
                OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                      (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                continued

Complete Final Decision on New Active Ingredients and Applications for Registration
and Tolerances.  OPP defines the following as  "final decisions" for purposes of
measuring performance in the pesticide registration program:

a)   withdrawal by applicant
b)   denial of registration
c)   unconditional registration
d)   conditional registration
 Provide number of final registration decisions by quarter:
                                      Ql
                                  Q2
Q3
Q4
Total
P-5A  New Chemical/New Biochemical/
       Microbiological

P-5B  Old Chemicals

P-5C  Amended Registrations

P-5D  New Uses

P-5A Report on the number of final decisions on New Active Ingredients (New Chemical/New
     Biochemical/Microbiological) administratively targeted to be completed within the
     quarter.
2
340
550
60
3
385
690
20
2
325
660
10
3
375
725
20
10
1425
2625
110
                                                                                  OPTS - 18
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                         DEFINITIONS
                                        FY 1990 STARS
                          OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                          continued

New Chemicals - Applications for registration  of a pesticide active ingredient that is not
currently registered under FIFRA.  Final decisions may  result in denial, unconditional
registration, conditional registration, or administrative withdrawal.

NOTE:     Registration of a food-use chemical,  i.e. of  a chemical  that might leave a residue
          on a food or feed item, requires the establishment of a  tolerance or exemption from
          tolerance.

New Biochemical/Microbiological - Application  for registration of  new biochemical or microbial
products not currently registered with the Agency, whether for food use or non-food use.
Included under these activities are:

     Biochemical (pheromone, insect or plant growth regulators and hormones used as
     pesticides).

     Microbial (viruses, bacteria, protozoa and fungi — any living organism introduced into
     the environment to control the population or biological activities of another life form
     that is considered a pest under FIFRA).

     Biotechnical products (genetically engineered microbial pesticides, or GEMP).  Each
     biotechnical product will undergo a risk  assessment and risk/benefit analysis.

NOTE:     As with other new pesticides, registration of a new food-use biochemical requires
          the establishment of a tolerance level or an  exemption.
                                                                                  OPTS - 19
                                                                                  12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE  OF  PESTICIDES  PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

P-5B   Provide number of  final decisions  on  Old Chemical  Applications administratively targeted
       to be completed within the  quarter, and  the  number actually completed.

  Old Chemicals - Applies to applications for registration of new products containing pesticide
  active ingredient chemicals and  biologicals which have  previously been registered.  Old
  chemical "change" applies to applications  in  which there is a significant    change in formula
  or use pattern.  "Me too" applications  deal with  chemicals and biologicals whose formulation
  and use patterns are identical or  substantially similar to those previously registered.

P-5C   Provide number of  final decisions  on  Amended Registration

Applications administratively targeted to be completed  within the quarter and the number
actually completed.

Amended Registrations - Changes to an existing  registration not including notifications or
significant new uses.

P-5D   Provide number of  final decisions  on  New Use Applications administratively targeted to be
       completed within the quarter, and  the number actually completed.

New Uses - Any major changes involving new uses of  old  products.
                                                                                    OPTS - 20
                                                                                    12/89

-------
P-6
                                    DEFINITIONS
                                   FY 1990 STARS
                     OFFICE  OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                          (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                     continued

Provide number of final decisions on Emergency Exemptions to be completed by quarter:
           x  1st quarter
           x  2nd quarter
           x  3rd quarter
           x  4th quarter
                 TOTAL
                                  40 Final Decisions
                                  80' Final Decisions
                                 140 Final Decisions
                                  65 Final Decisions
                                 325
Emergency Exemption - An exemption  from  the  normal  registration requirements of FIFRA which  is
granted by a Federal or State agency  if  EPA  determines  that emergency  conditions exist,  (e.g., a
pest outbreak is identified and no  effective pesticide  is  registered for the particular  use).
P-7    Provide number of  final decisions  on  Tolerance  Petitions  targeted to be processed during
       the quarter:
           x  1st quarter
           x  2nd quarter
           x  3rd quarter
           x • 4th quarter
                 TOTAL
                                  10 Final Decisions
                                  15 Final Decisions
                                  15 Final Decisions
                                  20 Final Decisions
                                  60
                                                                                     OPTS -  21
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE  OF  PESTICIDES  PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

FFDCA Tolerance Petition Decision  -  applies  to  all  requests  for tolerance levels and exemptions
from requirement of a tolerance  for  pesticide residues  in or on raw  agricultural commodities,
processed foods and minor uses.  EPA is required by law to process tolerance petitions in 180
days; however, OPP has set an administrative deadline of 240 days to better reflect increases in
the complexity of submissions.

P-8A  WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD

REGIONAL OFFICES

1)   Upon publication of the final worker protection rule in Ql, the regional offices will
discuss and explain the rule with  state lead agencies and other units holding enforcement
cooperative agreements with State  agency.

  Goal:     All of the states and  territories will  be informed about the rule within 60 days of
            publication (Q2); within 6 months of publication, the cooperative agreements will
            have worker protection activities incorporated (Q4).

2)   For each cooperative enforcement agreement, the Region  will identify the state/organization
roles and responsibilities for implementing  the worker  protection program.  The
agencies/organizations that are responsible  for the following activities should be worker
protection activities for all (100%) of their states/territories with cooperative agreements.
                                                                                    OPTS - 22
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF  PESTICIDES  PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD   (cont'd)

3)   The regions should review the progress/problems  associated with the implementing the worker
protection rule and prepare  a status report  for  each  cooperative  agreement.

  Goal:     Reports will be  due  the 3rd and  4th  quarters.

HEADQUARTERS

1)   Publish the final worker protection rule.

  Goal:     Publish the final worker protection  rule  in the  1st quarter FY 1990.

2)   Provide regions/state and local officials with training materials on the following
schedule:

  Goal:     3rd qtr...l5 brochures
            4th qtr... 5 videos  and 5  slide  shows

P-8B  GROUND WATER INITIATIVE

REGIONAL OFFICES

1)   Upon publication by Headquarters  of the Ground Water  State Management Plan Guidance
Document  (Q3), the regional  office will discuss  the advantages of the "state" approach and urge
each state to develop management plans.
                                                                                    OPTS - 23
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE  OF  PESTICIDES  PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

GROUND WATER INITIATIVE  (cont'd)

  Goals:    Discuss the  advantages  of  state  management  plans with all states/territories within
            60 days of publication  of  the guidance  document  (Q4), and;
            Determine the  states/tribes commitment  to develop  state management plans and a time
            frame  for doing so;

  Goal:     Report all  (100%)  of  states/tribes  status  (Q4).

2)   For each affected state/territory/tribe in the region, identify the state agencies' roles
and responsibilities for managing pesticide  contamination  in ground water.  The agencies and
supervisors responsible  for the following activities under the state management plan concept
should be identified:
          water monitoring activities,
          mapping vulnerable areas,
          responding to  positive  findings,
          overall  state  agency coordination,  and
     -    organization/individual that will  serve as the primary contact.
  Goal:
Have the information for all  (100%) of the committed states/territories/tribes (Q4).
3)   After the criteria for evaluating  state management plans becomes available, the region will
review submitted state plans within  60  days of  receipt.  SPMS quarterly reports will include the
state, date received and the review  completion  date  and whether the plan was approved.
NOTE:  Due to the Headquarters completion date  and  the complexity of compiling a state
management plan, it is questionable that many states will have a plan ready to submit in FY
                                                                                '90.
                                                                                    OPTS - 24
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF  PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

GROUND WATER INITIATIVE  (cont'd)

  Goal:     Review submitted plans within  60 days  from date received.

HEADQUARTERS

1)    Publish the final Agriculture Chemicals in  Ground Water  Strategy document.

  Goal:  Publish the document by 	.

2)    Publish the final State Ground Water  Management  Plan Guidance Document.

  Goal:     Publish the management plan guidance document by  the end of Q3.

3)    Publish the four criteria documents needed  for the state ground water management plans.
Criteria documents will address the following areas:

     -    approval criteria for pesticide  management  plans,
          monitoring criteria,
          response criteria for contaminated water, and
          evaluation criteria for Pesticide Management Plans
          (PMP's).

  Goal:     Publish the draft criteria documents for  comment  by the end of Q2.  Publish the
            final criteria documents by the end  of Q3.
                                                                                    OPTS - 25
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF  PESTICIDES  PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

P-8C  ENDANGERED SPECIES

REGIONAL OFFICES

1)    For each state that accepts the base  funding  for endangered  species activities, the
regional office will identify:

     A)     the organization of the states'  information response  system that has the capability
            of:
                 responding to user requests for county bulletins, and
            -    provide nationally printed materials on the endangered species program to the
                 public.

     B)     the organization and steps the states  will  take to address any issues  (associated
            with federally listed endangered species) which arise including:

            -    habitat conformation or identification,
            -    review maps of endangered species habitats, and
                 disseminate information regarding newly identified/listed species.

  Goal:     100% of the states accept base funding and  have a program in place by  the end of Q3.
                                                                                    OPTS - 26
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF PESTICIDES PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

ENDANGERED SPECIES  (cont'd)

2)   For states/territories that are eligible for additional funding, the regional office will
provide assistance to states/territories/tribes to develop a proposed work plan and accompanying
schedule which develops their own state protection plan or outlines plans to participate in the
federal program as a pilot.  If applicable, plans should  include provisions for the following:

  -    recommended roles and responsibilities of EPA  and  the different state departments in
       carrying out the Program,
       disseminate EPA-developed educational materials for pesticide users as well as public
       outreach information,
  -    review habitat maps to ensure that they provide accurate descriptions of where endangered
       species must be protected,
       outline the criteria they will use to monitor  and  evaluate the effectiveness of the
       pilot/program or other funded activities, and
       for those states evaluating the economic and/or environmental impacts of their programs,
       develop/contribute information on the economics and/or environmental impact of
       pilot/proposed programs.

  Goals:    Provide assistance to all (100%) of the states that wish to participate in state or
            federal pilot programs by the end of 2nd  quarter.

            Provide a status report on the completion of  the 5 items listed above for all states
            participating in pilot/special program in the 3rd and 4th Quarters.
                                                                                    OPTS - 27
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE OF  PESTICIDES  PROGRAMS)
                                            continued

ENDANGERED SPECIES  (cont'd)

3)   For each state/tribal plan or  federal pilot  that has been  finalized, submit a quarterly
report on the progress of the program.

4)   Review and comment on all state submitted  plans.

  Goal:     Complete the regional review of  state submitted plans within 60 days of receipt in
            the Regional Office; report date received and date  review was given to the state.

HEADQUARTERS

1)   Publish the final Endangered Species Protection Program in the  Federal Register.

  Goal:     Publish in Q3.

2)   Produce and disseminate to the regional offices educational materials to  include:

  Goals:     Publish information brochures explaining the Endangered  Species program (Q3);

            Generic video tape will be used by  state Certification and training programs  (Q4);

            Provide the regions with county specific bulletins  necessary for use in the Pilot
            programs (Q3).
                                                                                     OPTS - 28
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                                             FY 1990 STARS
                               OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                      (OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)
T-l  Review and take action on new chemicals.

     This measure reports on the number  of  new  chemical  notices  received  (PMNs, Biotechnology
     Notices and Exemptions) and control actions  taken on  new  chemicals which pose a threat to
     public health or the environment.   If  EPA  fails  to  take regulatory action on a new chemical, a
     submitter is free to commence manufacture  or  import;  a manufacturer  or importer must file an
     NOC within 30 days which certifies  that manufacture  or import has occurred.  [There is no
     correlation between new chemical submissions, control actions, and NOCs within a fiscal year.]
     Action:  A.
              B.
              C.
Report new chemical notices received for Premanufacture Notices (PMNs),
Biotechnology Notices, Low Volume Exemptions, Test Market Exemption
Applications, and Polymer Exemptions (annual target is 2790).
Report control actions taken which include consent or unilateral 5(e)
orders, 5(f) orders and withdrawals in face of §5(e) or 5(f) action
(170 control actions anticipated).
Report the number of NOCs received during FY90.
T-2  Data received under TSCA  information gathering provisions
     The information gathering capabilities  of TSCA  sections
     used to fill data gaps on chemicals  for  other agencies,
                                           4, 5(e), 8(a), 8(d) and 8(e)
                                           other EPA offices, and OTS.
are
     Action:  A.I
              B.I
              B.2
 Count number of reports received under §8(a), 8(d) and 4 by primary user
 Count number of reports received under §8(e)
 Count number of test studies received under §5(e)
 Summary to date of §8(a), 8(d), 8(e) and 5(e)
 Summary to date of studies received under §4
     No targets are established for  this  measure
                                                                                    OPTS - 29
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                                DEFINITIONS
                                               FY 1990 STARS
                                 OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                        (OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)


T-3  Report on Activities Related to Regulatory Investigations and Risk Management Actions.

     This measure will provide reports of actions taken  on existing chemicals that are in the
     Agency's formal options selection process, are planned for TSCA §6 regulation, are subject
     to regulation under §5(a)(2), or are subject to  referral to other agencies via §9(a) or 9(d).
     Options selection is the formal process that determines the appropriate regulatory mechanism on
     chemicals under investigation.  TSCA §6 provides EPA with the authority to control a chemical
     as a hazardous substance if the Agency finds that  there is a reasonable basis for concluding
     that the chemical presents or will present an unreasonable risk.  Section 5(a)(2) defines
     significant new uses for an existing chemical that  would be regulation of chemical risks to
     other agencies which have adequate statutory authority to regulate the risks; §9(d) requires
     EPA to consult and coordinate with other  Federal agencies to achieve maximum enforcement of
     TSCA.


T-4  Public Access to Section 313 Toxic Release Inventory Data

     This measure provides reports of actions  taken to meet the statutory mandate to make the
     TRI data through both online and "other means."  EPA has selected the National Library of
     Medicine's Toxnet system as the method to disseminate the data online.  In addition, EPA has
     decided to produce and market the TRI data via computer tapes, compact disks (CD-ROM),
     microfiche, and computer diskettes.  The  data is also provided to the public via the Title
     III Reporting Center.  This measure will  provide quarterly reports on the status of each
     of these efforts.   No target is established for  this measure.


T-5  Section 313 Toxic Release Inventory Facility Audits

     This measure provides a report on audits  of facilities that filed Section 313 forms.  The
     report (which provides summary statistics since  individual facility identities are confi-
     dential) will cover: accuracy with which  facilities applied release estimation methods;
     common errors in release reporting; rate  of errors  in determining whether a chemical must
     be reported.  "Accuracy" will be projected to national reporting totals.   The report will
     identify specific areas where the form, instructions, training, or technical guidance can
     be improved to reduce future errors.  No  target  is  established for this measure.

-------
                              OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                     (OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)


T-6  ASHAA Close-Outs/Status  Reports

     The universe will  consist  of  all  projects  awarded ASHAA loan  and grant money during
     FY1986, 1987,  1988 and 1989  (including BIA  projects)  that  have  not been closed-out.

     .Close-Out Site  Evaluations—Consist  of  on-site  abatement  inspections, interviews with LEA
      and school officials, and final  inspection reports  by AARPs.   Close-out site evaluations
      entered  into  the  official tracking system  count  against the  target.   (Note: the fact that
      some special  condition  may  not have  been  met  for a  given  project does not disqualify the
      close-out evaluation from counting against the  target, as long as the on-site evaluation
      is complete and registered  properly  in  Headquarter*s ASHAA tracking system).

     .Fourth Quarter  Status Reports  will contain information on the  projects that received
      formal extensions  (such extensions generally  apply  only to 1988 and 1989 projects)
      through  the fourth  quarter  and are not  expected  to  be completed in 1989.  Status reports
      will also provide detail  on  all  projects  (i.e.,  1986-1989) that did not receive extensions
      and were not  completed  during  FY1990.   Status reports will not count  against the target.
      However, they will  provide  justification  for  the Region not  meeting the target.


     .Action:  Regions  will submit close-out  inspection reports as soon as  completed so that
               Headquarters can review and enter the  information into the ASHAA tracking system
               (quarterly, Headquarters will  provide  Regions with  draft figures for comment).
               Regions  will provide  status reports  for fourth quarter as defined above.


T-7  EPCRA-Section  313  Technical  Outreach  Activities  to Industry

     .Technical Assistance—Reaching out to the  regulated community  to inform them of the
      EPCRA Section 313  regulations  and how to  comply  with these regulation.

     .Outreach Assistance—Reaching  out to the  general public and  the government agencies
      (Federal, State,  local) to  inform them  about  the EPCRA Section 313 Program, avail-
      ability  of the  TRI  data,  how to  access  the data, uses of  the data.

     .Workshop—A program designed by  the  Section 313  staff (or contractor) consisting of a
      minimum  of four hours.  Typically this  program  would receive widespread publicity (via
      mailings to potential attendees, announcements  in newsletters, trade  journals, etc.).
      A workshop can  be a sub-part of  an industry sponsored event.
                                                                                    OPTS - 31
                                                                                    12/89

-------
                                                DEFINITIONS
                                              FY 1990 STARS
                                OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                       (OFFICE OF TOXIC  SUBSTANCES)



T-8  EPCRA-Section 313 General Outreach Activities

     .Presentation—A speech  or discussion  by EPCRA Section 313 staff to inform the audience
      of any aspect of the Section 313 Program.  Typically it would be no more than two hours.
      It could be to a small  group of people  (e.g., State staff people, SERC, LEPC, environ-
      mental group), or could be a part of  a  larger program (conference, meeting,  etc.).  The
      logistical effort is minimal compared to  a workshop.


T-9  Asbestos Accreditation Programs  (Status  of State Programs)

     The universe will consist of Accreditation Programs for each of five disciplines to be
     developed by every State/Territory (100%).


     .Fully Approved State/Territory Accreditation Program will refer to the establishment by
      the State/Territory of an Accreditation Program for each of five disciplines (inspector/
      management planner,  contractor, worker, project designer, and refresher).   The
      establishment of a program for each one of these disciplines counts against  the target.
      If State A, for example, establishes  all  five programs,  the Region would report five.
      If State B, on the other hand, establishes just contractor and worker course, two counts
      would be reported.

     .Progress Reports for each quarter will be submitted for States/Territories that do not
      have programs in any or all of the disciplines.   They will include information on what
      the Region is doing to assist the State in establishing the accreditation  programs.

     .Action:  Regions will report quarterly on a per-discipline basis,  all State/Territory
               Accreditation Programs developed.  Regions will submit progress reports as
               defined above.
                                                                                  OPTS - 32

-------
                                         •» *• .».-»-* V t^f JL f±±\U          	
                           OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (OFFICE  OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES)



T-10 Asbestos Accreditation  Programs  (Course  Audits)

     The universe will  consist  of  all  courses contingently  approved by  EPA on the date which
     Agency discontinues  course  reviews.   Targets will  be set  at  between  50% and 80% of all
     contingently approved courses by  the end of  the  fiscal year.

     .Course Audits  (for  full approval):  an on-site audit of a course conducted by a Regional
      representative  to determine  if  the  course meets  the criteria  set  forth in the EPA Model
      Accreditation Plan, and uses instructional  materials  and personnel  indicated in the
      course submission.  (This  definition.applies  to  Refresher Courses, as well.)

     .Development by  State or Territory of Asbestos Accreditation Program in a Particular
      Discipline will permit Regions  to delegate  to the State  or  Territory the responsibility
      of auditing asbestos courses, contingently  approved by EPA, for full approval within that
      discipline.  Thus,  whenever  a State or  Territory  establishes  its  accreditation program in
      a particular discipline,  the Region may count all courses associated with that discipline
      in that State toward the  target.

     .Fourth Quarter  Exception  Reports will be provided to  Headquarters explaining why courses
      in the universe were not  audited for full approval.

     .Action:  The Regions will  report on the number  of audits of courses in the universe, based
               upon targets.  The  Regions will also submit  fourth quarter reports, as defined
               above.


T-ll PCBs Enhancement Activities

     The PCB report describing  each State in  the  Regions current  PCB State enhancement program
     should include the following:

     .Provide a  list  and  supporting documentation  for  States which  currently regulate PCBs under
      RCRA.
     .Provide a  list  of States  that have  PCB  regulations in place and copies of the regulations.
     .Provide any written State  PCB policy.
     .Provide any agreements that  the  Regions may have  with your  States (i.e., Region V has an
      agreement  with  Ohio concerning  inspections).
     .List any activities in the States  (i.e., any  inspections, clean-up, etc.).
                                                                                   OPTS - 33
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                                          DEFINITIONS
                                         FY  1990 STARS
                            OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC  SUBSTANCES
                                    (PESTICIDES ENFORCEMENT)
PESTICIDES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS
A "Significant Violator" is
in 40 CFR 173  (interpretive
areas will consist of those
health or the environment.
priority areas agreed to by
"significant" violations to
any violation which meets the criteria for significant cases set forth
rule governing FIFRA Section 26 and 27 referrals).  In general, priority
state pesticide activities which present greatest potential for harm to
EPA will determine, on a case-by-case basis, which allegations in the
EPA and the State in the cooperative agreement involve sufficiently
be formally referred to the State and tracked.
"Addressed," with reference to State action, is defined  in accordance with the Final Interpretive
Rule and includes "referral of the case to a pesticide control board or State's
attorney for action."

"Timeframe," with reference to State action, is the timeframe negotiated between the Region and each
State for completion of investigation plus the timeframe agreed upon by the Region and each State
for initiation of prosecution.

An "appropriate State Enforcement action" is an action which meets the criteria in 40 CFR 173.  In
general, the severity of the proposed enforcement action must correlate with the gravity of the
violation.  Specifically, each state cooperative agreement will identify "appropriate" action
relative to the remedies available to the state.

An "appropriate Federal Enforcement action" for a "Significant violator" is one of the following:


                o  Administrative Complaint
                o  Civil Judicial Action for penalty collection
                o  Criminal Action
                o  Compliance Agreement in the case of a Federal facility
                                                                                OPTS  -  34

-------
                                           DEFINITIONS
                                          FY 1990 STARS
                             OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                  (TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT)


TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS

Formal Enforcement Action - Noncompliance is addressed by an administrative complaint or by a civil
or criminal judicial action.  All SNCs must be addressed by a  formal enforcement action—at minimum
an administrative complaint.

Minor Enforcement Action - Noncompliance is addressed by a Notice of Noncompliance.

Significant Noncompliance (SNC) - TSCA Significant Noncompliance  (SNC) is a violation of one of the
following regulations under TSCA:

                o PCB regulations
                o Title II  (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act)
                o Asbestos Worker Protection
                o Section 4 testing requirements
                o Section 5 premanufacture notice requirements
                o Section 8 reporting/recordkeeping requirements
                o Section 13 import certifications
                o All Federal Facility cases

for which the level of enforcement action is, at minimum, an administrative complaint in accordance
with the appropriate Enforcement Response Policy  (ERP), and for which the penalty is, at minimum,
$25,000.

The SNC determination is made prior to calculating penalty adjustment factors such as voluntary
disclosure, culpability, etc.  In matters involving multiple violations,  the case will be considered
SNC if the total penalty is $25,000 or more.

Note:  For Federal facilities, SNC is a facility where the violation(s),  as defined above,  would
normally result in a formal enforcement action.  These actions, however,  are handled in accordance
with the EPA Federal Facility Compliance Strategy.

Note:  Target for issuing cases under T/E-4 applies only to PCB violations, AHERA violations based
on  inspections, and Worker Protection violations.



                                                                            OPTS - 35
                                                                             12/89

-------
                                            DEFINITIONS
                                           FY 1990 STARS
                              OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                   (TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT)


TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS  (continued)

An administrative civil complaint  is  issued  for  SNC  violations  where a violation: presents a  real
(but not an extreme or imminent) risk  to human health  or  environment; is likely to be an  isolated
occurrence; and is apparently the  result of  ordinary negligence, inadvertence, or mistake.  In those
cases involving extreme or  imminent risk to  human  health  or  the environment, the Regions  may
initiate judicial action  (e.g.,  injunctions,  seizures, civil and criminal actions).  In these
instances, the case is referred  to OECM and  monitored  using  the OECM Docket System.

SNC Fixed J3as_e _ (jpre-FJT _199Q).. - Refers  to reducing  the  number of pre-FY 1990 SNC cases on  the
Beginning-of-Year (BOY) inventory.  Each quarter,  Regions report the status on the number of pending
cases for which enforcement actions are issued  (opened),  and the number qf open cases closed.

BOY _lnv.entpry - Consists of all  SNC cases, including Federal Facility actions, as follows:
"pending" - violations detected  in inspections conducted  prior  to FY 1990 for which enforcement
actions were notissued as of 10-01-89, and  "open" - cases issued prior to FY 1990 and not closed as
of 10-01-89.  The BOY inventory  should not change  in FY 1990.

SNC Dynamic Base (FY 1990 Cases) - Refers to  taking  action against newly identified FY 1990 SNC
cases based on FY 1990 inspections.  Regions  report  each  quarter on the number of cases issued and
closed.

Target for Dynamic Base - Target is to issue  75% of  enforcement actions within 180 days of
inspection for PCB, AHERA and Worker Protection violations.  Excluded from the target are: AHERA
violations for failure to submit plans not based on  inspections, violations of TSCA Sections 4, 5, 8
and 13.

Pending - Violations for which enforcement action  has not been  issued.

Open - Cases for which an administrative complaint has been issued, but the case has not been
closed.

Closed - The case is either withdrawn  or a consent agreement and order has been issued.

Note:  For a Federal facility, the case will be considered closed when EPA receives a letter from the
facility verifying compliance or when  a compliance agreement with an acceptable schedule for
returning facility to compliance is signed.

-------
                             OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC  SUBSTANCES
                                   (TOXIC  SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT)



TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS  (continued)

Federal Facilities Compliance Agreements  - are equivalent to  "formal enforcement actions."  The term
compliance agreement refers to the mechanism under Executive  Order 12088 for solving compliance
problems between EPA and other Federal agencies.  A Compliance Agreement must specify the corrective
action to be taken, the schedule for achieving compliance, and the requirements for reporting
progress.

Permitted PCS Disposal Facilities Agreements - are landfills, incinerators, high efficiency boilers,
R&D, alternative methods including mobile uni^ts , and natural  gas pipelines with alternative
technology permits.  Includes all Headquarter's and regional permitted facilities.

Brokers/storers - refers to PCB brokers,  commercial storage facilities and intermediate handling
facilities.

Initial inspection - is the first inspection of a facility in the current fiscal year.

Follow-up inspection - any and all inspections of a facility  after the initial inspection, in a
single fiscal year.

See May 1988 PCB Compliance Strategy for  inspection requirements.
                                                                OPTS -  37
                                                                 12/89

-------
                                              DEFINITIONS
                                             FY 1990 STARS
                                OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                                          (EPCRA ENFORCEMENT)
EMERGENCY PLANNING/COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW (EPCRA) ENFORCEMENT DEFINITIONS

Formal Enforcement Action - Noncompliance is addressed by an administrative  complaint or  by  a  civil
or criminal  judicial  action.  All SNCs must be addressed by a  formal  enforcement  action—at  minimum
an administrative complaint.

Significant Noncompliance (SNC) - EPCRA Significant Noncompliance (SNC)  is  a  violation of the  EPCRA
regulationsfor non reporting/failure  to report a chemical, or falsified  report,  for  which  the  level
of enforcement action is, at minimum,  an administrative complaint,  in accordance  with the EPCRA
Enforcement Response Policy (ERP).

SNC Fixed Base (Pre-FY 1990) - Refers  to reducing the number of pre-FY 1990  SNC  cases on  the
Beginning-of-Year (BOY) inventory.  Each quarter, Regions report the  status  on  the  number of pending
cases for which enforcement actions are issued, and the number of open cases  closed.

BOY Inventory - Consists of all SNC cases, as follows:  "pending" -  violations  detected in
inspections conducted prior to FY 1990 for which enforcement actions  were not issued  as of  10-01-89,
and "open" - cases issued prior to FY  1990 and not closed as of 10-01-89.  The  BOY  inventory should
not change in FY 1990.

SNC Dynamic Base (FY 1990 Cases) - Refers to taking action against  newly  identified  FY 1990  SNC
cases based on FY 1990 inspections.  Regions report each quarter on  the  number  of cases issued  and
closed.  Target is to issue 75% of enforcement actions within  180 days of inspection.

Pending - Violations for which enforcement action has not been issued.

Open - Cases for which an administrative complaint has been issued,  but  the  case  has  not  been
closed.

C1osed - The case is either withdrawn  or a consent agreement and order have  been  issued.

-------
                        OPTS
               ASHAA CLOSEOUT SITE EVAL—PROJ RECVNG
               FUNDING IN FY 86.87.88.89   (T-6a)
 Region
Universe
Quarter
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target*
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
178
19
24
82
123
82
43
52
26
27
656
*NOTE:    At time of publication of GOCMS,, there were target discrepancies remaining.  OPTS is
          working with the Regions and expects that  all targets  for this measure may change.  OPTS
          is currently working with the Regions to be sure  target  change requests are completed
          before the April 30, 1990, deadline.
                                                                                       OPTS - 39
                                                                                       12/89

-------
                        OPTS  11
               ASBESTOS REFRESHER COURSE
                                    (T-9f)
 Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
28
27*
18
17
17
5
9
18
1
144
*NOTE:    At time of publication of GOCMs, a target discrepancy remained in Region III.
          working with Region III to resolve.
                                                                     OPTS is
                                                                                       OPTS - 40
                                                                                       12/89

-------
                        OPTS  13   COURSE AUDITS' COMPLETED FOR FULL
                                   APPRVL/GRANTED CONTING APPRVL T-lOa
 Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target *
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
44
63
44
32
30
2
17
25
2
276
*NOTE:     At time of publication of GOCMS,, there were target discrepancies remaining.  OPTS is
          working with the Regions and expects that all targets  for this measure may change.  OPTS
          is currently working with the Regions to be sure target change requests are completed
          before the April 30, 1990, deadline.
                                                                                       OPTS - 41
                                                                                       12/89

-------
                       OPTS   17    FIFRA INSPECTIONS SA"S/COMPL RATES
                                   —STATE ENF INSPECT'S — ALL USES
Region
Universe
Quarter
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
111
215
198
730
678
468
142
292
350
61
3245
274
425
396
1,460
1,356
947
296
475
750
133
6512
525
700
648
2.190
2,034
1,683
533
876
1,150
299
10.638
730
1,050
890
2,930
2.710
2,377
867
1.379
1,550
500
14,983
                                                                                       OPTS - 42
                                                                                       12/89

-------
                        OPTS  18   FIFRA INSPECT'S  SA"S/COMPL RATES	
                                   —EPA ENF INSPECTIONS—ALL USES REG  7/8
 Region
          Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
25
0
0
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
63
50
0
0
113
0
0
0
0
0
0
141
100
0
0
241
0
0
0
0
0
0
187
155
0
0
342
NOTE:
Only Regions VII and VIII have targets for this measure.
                                                                                       OPTS - 43
                                                                                       12/89

-------
                       OPTS   42    TSCA (EPA)  insp's conducted
                                                                   (T/E-la)
Region
Universe
Quarter
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
HOs
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
58
23
29
81
21
15
19
27
20
13
323
39
107
60
78
166
76
49
38
64
42
33
752
61
167
115
136
281
133
83
57
106
73
56
1268
83
227
149
167
378
183
117
79
140
113
70
1706
                                                                                      OPTS - 44
                                                                                      12/89

-------
                                                                                 PAGE  12
                       OPTS   45    TSCA (State)  inspections
                                   conducted
                                                (T/E-ld)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target -
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
20
50
15
105
36
70
23
40
18
451
153
40
100
30
233
94
141
51
95
38
975
232
60
150
45
399
187
218
79
155
55
1580
314
85
220
60
565
282
295
117
196
90
2224
                                                                                      OPTS -45
                                                                                      12/89

-------
                            OPTS   66    PCB Permitted Facilities—No.
                                   Insp's—initial
                                                (T/E-6a)
Region
Universe
Quarter
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
3
3
8
0
1
0
20
0
6
0
2
3
6
10
0
2
1
30
1
10
0
4
6
9
10
1
3
1
45
1
20
2
5
10
13
10
2
3
2
68
                                                                                       OPTS - 46
                                                                                       12/89

-------
                       OPTS  72    Broker/Storage Facilities —
                                   Inspections
                                                (T/E-6g)
Region
Universe
Quarter 1
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
8
1
2
0
17
3
0
7
8
0
2
16
2
4
2
44
4
0
11
13
10
4
28
3
6
4
83
7
0
15
15
10
6
40
5
6
9
113
                                                                                      OPTS - 47
                                                                                      12/89

-------
                       OPTS   77
               EPCRA—Number  of  EPA
                                   Inspections Conducted
                                                fE/E-la)
Region
Universe
Quarter
 Target
 Quarter 2
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 3
Cumulative
  Target
 Quarter 4
Cumulative
  Target
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
National
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
32
15
10
26
12
10
9
20
8
152
15
57
35
30
50
26
23
18
40
18
312
35
72
60
55
85
40
38
28
60
30
503
50
87
76
65
119
50
51
42
82
47
669
                                                                                       OPTS - 48
                                                                                       12/89

-------
                            ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM

As of January 1990, the  following OPTS projects are being tracked in the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE:
DUE DATE
OPTS   23    WORKER PROTECTION  STANDARDS                            4/ 3/90
OPTS   77    RESTRICTED USE  CLASS./GW CONTAMINATING PESTICIDES     4/23/91
OPTS   80    RULEMAKING CONCERNING  CERTAIN MICROBIAL PRODUCTS      9/22/89
OPTS   92    STORAGE, DISPOSAL,  TRANSPORT.  & RECALL OF PEST.       12/ 1/91
OPTS   95    REVISE PESTICIDE APPLICATORS  CERTIFICATION REGS        4/28/91
OPTS  100    SARA SECTION  313 PEAK  RELEASE RULE                    3/13/91
OPTS  101    DIOXINS/FURANS  IN  PAPER PRODUCTS                      5/18/92
OPTS  102    AHERA EVALUATION                                       2/28/91
OPTS  103    CFCs SUBSTITUTE STRATEGY                              4/30/90
OPTS  104    EUP AMENDMENT FOR  BIOTECHNOLOGY                       4/30/90
                                                                           OPTS - 49
                                                                           12/89

-------
Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring

FY 1990GOCMS

-------
                OFFICE  OF  ENFORCEMENT  AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                                     FY 1990
OBJECTIVE
MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Report on status of consent
decree compliance to ensure
follow through on EPA
enforcement actions.
Complete HQ review of
proposed Consent Decrees
within an average timeframe.
CONSENT DECREE TRACKING
Report on the compliance status of EPA consent
decrees by Region and statute each quarter.
Regional reports include the names and numbers of:
a. Active consent decrees
b. Active consent decrees in compliance
c. Active consent decrees in violation where
formal enforcement action has commenced
d. Active consent decrees in violation where
formal enforcement action is planned but has
not commenced
e. Active consent decrees in violation with no
formal enforcement action planned or necessary
at this time
PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE REVIEW TIME
Report quarterly on the average review time by HQ
for proposed consent decrees (by Statute) (target
= 35 days). OECM reports on the:
Number of consent decrees reviewed by OECM and
forwarded to DOJ
Number of consent decrees reviewed by OECM and
declined or returned to the Regions
Average review time in days
Range of time needed to review consent decrees
(minimum and maximum)
E/C-1
E/C-2
Q
1,2,3,4
Q
1,2,3,4
                                                                         OECM - 1
                                                                         12/89

-------
                           OFFICE  OF  ENFORCEMENT  AND  COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                                               FY 1990
          OBJECTIVE
                     MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide  support  to  program
offices   and   Regions   in
developing new  referrals of
high quality-
Provide  support  to  program
offices,  Regions,  and  the
Department   of   Justice  in
bringing high  quality cases
to a timely conclusion.
CIVIL

REFERRAL ACTIVITY AND STRATEGIC VALUE OF CASES

Report quarterly  on the cumulative number  of EPA
civil actions.   Report the total  of  all programs
for the following:

    New referrals to HQ from Regions (cumulative)
    New  direct  referrals  to  DOJ  from  Regions
    (including re-referred PRN's)  (cumulative)
    New pre-referral  negotiations  cases initiated
    (cumulative)
    Consent decree enforcement cases (cumulative)

FOLLOW-THROUGH ON ACTIVE CASE DOCKET

Pre-FY 1990 Universe
Specify the number  of civil cases  pending  at the
Department of  Justice or  filed  in the  Courts  at
the beginning of the fiscal year (including direct
referrals).   Each quarter, report  current  status
of cases by statute:

    Cases concluded after filing
    Cases concluded before filing
    Cases filed in court
    Cases pending at  the  Department of  Justice  or
    at the U.S. Attorney
    Cases returned to Regions
    Cases on-going  for more than  two years since
    filing
 E/C-3
 E/C-4
Q
1,2,3,4
0-
1,2,3,4
                                                                                   OECM - 2
                                                                                   12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                    FY 1990

                         MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide  support to  program
offices,  Regions,   and  the
Department  of   Justice   in
bringing high  quality cases
to a timely conclusion.
Provide  support  to  program
offices,   NEIC/Office    of
Criminal Investigations, and
the  Regions  in  developing
new    referrals    of    high
quality.
New FY 1990 Referrals
Specify the number  of  new civil cases referred to
the Department  of Justice since  the beginning of
the  fiscal  year  (including  direct  referrals  and
re-referred PRNs).  Each quarter, report cumula-
tively by statute:

    Cases concluded after filing
    Cases concluded before filing
    Cases filed  in court
    Cases pending at the  Department of Justice or
    at the U.S. Attorney
    Cases returned to Regions

CRIMINAL

REFERRAL ACTIVITY AND STRATEGIC VALUE OF CASES

Report cumulatively by principal statute  on  the
status  of  EPA  criminal  actions.    Report  will
include the following (see definitions):

    Number of new investigations opened
    Number  of open  investigations  as  of  end  of
    quarter
    Number  of   investigations   closed  prior   to
    referral to OCE
    Cumulative number of new referrals to OCE
    Cumulative number of new referrals to DOJ from
    OECM-
    Cumulative number of cases returned withdrawn,
    declined, or recommended for civil or adminis-
    trative action,  by HQ
 Date  the  SAIC signs the referral
"Date  the  AA for OECM signs  the referral
                                                         E/C-5
                                                         E/C-6
           Q
           1,2,3,4
           Q
           1,2,3,4
                                                                                   OECM - 3
                                                                                   12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                    FY 1990

                          MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide  support to  program
offices,    Regions,
NEIC/Office    of    Criminal
Investigations,    and    the
Department  of   Justice  in
bringing high  quality  cases
to  a  timely and  successful
conclusion.
     FOLLOW-THROUGH  ON ACTIVE  CASE  DOCKET

     Fixed  Universe
     Specify   the  number  of  criminal  referrals  in
     progress  at  DOJ  at  the  beginning of  the fiscal
     year.   Each quarter, report the current status of
     cases  by  principal statute.

        Number  of referrals to DOJ by  OECM
        Number  of referrals under  review at DOJ
        Number   of    referrals   under   a   grand  jury
        investigation
        Number  of referrals in which charges have been
        filed
        Cumulative    number    of   referrals   closed
        following prosecution
        Cumulative  number of
        without prosecution
                                                         referrals closed  by  DOJ
                               Dynamic Universe
                               Specify  the  number  of  new criminal  referrals  at
                               DOJ  since  the  beginning  of  the  fiscal  year.
                               Report cumulatively by principal statute:

                                   Cumulative number of referrals to DOJ by OECM
                                   Number of referrals under review at DOJ
                                   Number  of   referrals   under  a   grand  jury
                                   investigation
                                   Number of referrals in which charges have been
                                   filed
                                                          of    referrals    closed
         Cumulative    number
         following prosecution
         Cumulative  number of
         without  prosecution
                                                         referrals closed  by  DOJ
 E/C-7
                                                         E/C-8
Q
1,2,3,4
           Q
           1,2,3,4

-------
           OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                    FY 1990

                         MEASURE
                                                                                   SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide  information  on the
timely disposition of cases.
Provide  support  to  Program
Offices,  Regions,  and  the
Department   of   Justice  in
getting  quality settlements
with deterrant  impact.
    AVERAGE TIME

    CIVIL

    Report   the  average  time   from  initiation  to
    disposition  of  cases concluded  (with  a consent
    decree or litigation)  in FY  1990.

    CRIMINAL

    Report  the  total  number  of  referrals  during the
    fiscal year:

        Average time from opening of  criminal investi-
        gation to referral to OCE
        Average  time from referral  to DOJ  (the date
        first defendant's indictment  or  information)
        until charges filed

    CONCLUSION OF CASES

    SUPERFUND

    Of  the   Superfund   cases   concluded  since  the
    beginning of the year, report the total number of
    106 and 107 case conclusions and  joint 106 and 107
    case conclusions.
                                                                                    E/C-9
                                                                                    E/C-10
E/C-11
          Q4
          Q4
Q4
                                                                                   OECM - 5
                                                                                   12/89

-------
          OBJECTIVE
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                    FY 1990

                         MEASURE
                                                                                   SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Provide  support  to  Program
Offices,  Regions,  and  the
Department   of   Justice   in
getting  quality  settlements
with deterrant  impact.
    CIVIL

    Of  the  number of  non-superfund  cases  concluded
    after  referral to  the Department of Justice since
    the  beginning  of  the  year  (fixed  and  dynamic
    universe) report cumulative  total:

        Number of  cases concluded without penalty
        Number of  cases concluded with penalty
        Total penalties assessed

    CRIMINAL

    Of the number of criminal  dispositions  since  the
    beginning   of  the   year   (fixed  and   dynamic
    universe), report the cumulative total  by princi-
    pal statute:

        Number of  referrals  resulting in  a  conviction
        (plea and verdict)
        Number of  referrals  in  which all  charges were
        dismissed or all defendants were acquitted
        Number of defendants charged
        Number of defendants convicted
        Number of defendants acquitted or dismissed
        Number of defendants sentenced
        Amount of fines assessed (before suspension)
        Months of incarceration ordered
E/C-12
                                                                                    E/C-13
Q4
          Q4
                                                                                   OECM - 6
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                             OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                                                 FY 1990
                                            SPMS DEFINITIONS


E/C-1  Report on the compliance status of EPA consent decrees each quarter.*  Include name and number of:

       a.  Active consent decrees
       b.  Active consent decrees  in compliance
       c.  Active consent decrees  in violation where  formal enforcement action has commenced
       d.  Active consent decrees in violation where formal enforcement action is planned but has not yet
           commenced
       e.  Active consent decrees  in violation with no action planned  at this time

       DEFINITIONS:

       Reportable Violation

       A decree will be  reported as  in  violation if any term or condition of the decree is not complied
       with.  De Minimis violations are factored out by the timing of the reporting,  since violations should
       be addressed within a quarter.

       Appropriate Enforcement Action

       Formal enforcement actions include motions for contempt,  motions to  enforce the order, motions for
       specific performance, collection of penalties,  decree modifications  and contractor listing.  These
       actions will be counted in the enforcement action commenced category when they are referred by the
       Regions to Headquarters or directly to the Department of  Justice, in accordance with OECM referral
       procedures.  Less formal actions such  as  demand letters,  formal warning  letters,  etc.,  are not
       included in the list of appropriate action.   A pending violation means  no action had been taken or
       that the violation is  in the  first  stages  of being addressed (e.g., the source  was  sent a demand
       letter).
       * Show number of consecutive quarters consent decrees have been listed in each category.

                                                                                     OECM - 7
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                             OFFICE  OF  ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE  MONITORING
                                                 FY 1990
                                            SPMS DEFINITIONS


  Final Compliance Determinations

  In cases where the final compliance  date  in  the decree has been reached  and the  source  is  not meeting
  the final compliance limits or conditions of the decree, the decree shall be reported in category (c),
  (d) or  (e) of  E/C-1,  depending on the circumstances.   If  the Regional Office  has  determined  that  the
  source will be  unable to meet the final terms of the decree,  and enforcement action  is planned, the Region
  will continue  to  report the decree  in  category  (d) until one  of the acceptable  enforcement actions
  previously defined has been commenced.  At that time, the  decree will be reported as  in violation with
  enforcement action commenced until it is returned  to  compliance  with the decree.    If  the  Region  has
  determined that the  final  terms  of  the  decree will be  met,  the  Region will  report the violation in
  category (e)  as in violation with no  action  planned at this time.   When  the final  terms of the decree
  are met, the decree will be reported  in the compliance category.

  Multiple Facilities

  Action taken to address  violations at more than one facility covered by the same  decree will only be
  reported and counted  as one decree.  The Regional actions  against multiple facilities covered by the same
  decree will be accounted for in the  significant noncomplier lists and the enforcement  actions tracked
  in the FY 1988 SPMS.


E/C-2  Pre-Referral Negotiation  (PRN) Cases - Pre-referral negotiation cases are  ones in which settlement
       negotiations are begun prior to  the  referral of a formal  litigation report  to DOJ and the filing
       of a complaint.

       1.  A PRN case  is  counted as "initiated"  when a pre-referral/mini  litigation  report is submitted
           to DOJ.

       2.  A PRN case is counted as  a new "civil  referral" when either a final draft consent  decree or a
           full  litigation report is referred to  DOJ.

       3.  A new PRN case, "initiated"  during  the fiscal year, may later  be counted  as a civil  referral
           per #2 above.  It will not count, however,  in both.

                                                                                     OECM - 8
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                             OFFICE  OF  ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                                                 FY 1990
                                            SPMS DEFINITIONS


E/C-6  Report on criminal referral activity and the strategic value of cases:

       Open Investigations

       The agent determines that evidence may exist that shows the violation of an environmental statute
       or regulation.  A preliminary investigation results in the opening of a case.  A project number is
       requested from OCI  and all investigatory activities  are charged to that number.  An OCI docket number
       is assigned and a case  form is submitted for entering the investigation in the EPA Criminal Docket.
       Subsequent  activities  are  charged against the  project  number and described in  the  EPA Criminal
       Docket.

       Investigations Closed Prior to Referral to EPA-OCE

       Investigation  has  shown:   that the allegations were unfounded, the  case  should  be  referred for
       administrative civil action, the case should be referred to another  agency or  law enforcement office,
       or there is  lack of  prosecutorial merit.   Includes cases in which the investigation is suspended
       and the information  in the closed is retained for intellegence purposes.


E/C-7  Report on follow-through on active criminal case docket
   C— Q
    O
       Fixed Universe

       All criminal  cases at  DOJ/USA or filed in  court  at the beginning of the  fiscal  year  (1990) are
       included in fixed universe.  Cases do not enter or exit the fixed universe  after October l, 1989.
       The purpose is to measure the  federal government's progress in moving cases through DOJ and the court
       system to conclusion (i.e. , closed following prosecution and closed without prosecution) by taking
       a snapshot of the fixed universe at the beginning of year and at the end of  each quarter.  Progress
       in getting  this years' number of BOY  fixed based  cases  through DOJ and the courts this year will
       be compared to the  same information collected in FY  1989 to identify bottlenecks in the DOJ/judicial
       process.


                                                                                     OECM - 9
                                                                                     12/89

-------
                      OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                                          FY 1990
                                     SPMS DEFINITIONS


Dynamic Universe

All cases referred to DOJ after the beginning of the fiscal year  (October 1, 1989) are included in
the dynamic universe.  The measure reports at the end of  each quarter the cumulative number of new
cases referred to  DOJ (i.e.,  the dynamic universe to date) and  the status of  these  cases  in the
DOJ/judicial process. Progress in moving new cases through DOJ and the court system will be compared
to the same information collected  in FY 1989.

The Fixed and Dynamic Universe measures  (E/C-7 and  C-8)  tracks  the  movement  of the cases through
the key  stages  of the criminal  enforcement system  by placing  fixed  points  of measurement  on  a
continuously revolving system,  i.e.,  on any given  day new cases are opened and other  cases are
closed.   The E/C-13 measure reports the end results of our FY 1990 enforcement efforts by indicating
the total number of cases closed, defendants charged, convicted,  acquitted or dismissed during the
year (a combined total of fixed and dynamic).
                                                                              OECM -  10
                                                                              12/89

-------
                           OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
                                               FY 1990
                                     Program;  Federal Activities
          OBJECTIVE
                     MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY
Federal Facilities
Compliance Program

Achieve  and  maintain  high
rates   of   compliance   at
Federal  facilities  through
the     A-106     pollution
abatement planning process.
Achieve and  maintain a high
rate    of    compliance   of
Federal facilities through a
comprehensive inspection and
enforcement program.
Report total  number of  inadequate  and additional
needed A-106  projects  for  each media  program  by
compliance class  category (i.e., class  I,  II,  or
III) .

Report the  total number of valid  inadequate  and
additional needed projects  (by  compliance  status
category) which have been satisfactorily addressed
by affected Federal agencies through adequate
A-106   projects  in   their   final  A-106   plan
submissions or other acceptable means.

Report the names  of those facilities which either
failed  to  respond  or  provide  an  unacceptable
response  to  projects  identified as inadequate  or
needed by EPA.

For each media program, report:
a.  the  number and  names  of   Federal  facilities
    inspected during the  quarter, with  dates  of
    inspections;
b.  violation  status  of  each  inspected facility;
    and
c.  date  and  type  of  enforcement action  (with
    quarterly updates).

(There are  no targets  for  the Office  of  Federal
Activities in FY  1990.)
 OFA/E-1
                                                                                    OFA/E-2
                                                                                    OFA/E-3
 OFA/E-4
01,2,3,4
B      y
Region
           Ql,2,3,4
           By
           Region
Q4
By
Region

Ql,2,3,4
By
Region
by media
                                                                                   OECM - 11
                                                                                   12/89

-------
                             OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIAN.CE MONITORING
                                                 FY 1990
                                       Program: Federal Activities
                                            SPMS  DEFINITIONS


Satisfactorily address:

Problem may be addressed through the A-106 process, thus:
       the facility has proposed an A-106 project which is adequate to  correct the identified problem; or

Potential ocmpliance problem may be addressed  through  other means, thus:
       problem has been corrected and facility already returned to physical compliance; or
       the facility is correcting the identified  problem  through the use of existing funds of some means
       other than the A-106 process.

If the potential  compliance  problem identified during the first quarter is  not  actually  present in the
facility at this time, the reported SPMS number for first quarter will be adjusted to  show that the problem
does not exist.

Adequate A-106  projects;   Federal  agency pollution abatement project  which has been  submitted  to EPA
Regional Office for review and determined by EPA to be adequate in terms of engineering, cost and timeliness
to prevent or correct compliance problems.

Violation rate:  Report the names of those Federal facilities which have been inspected by EPA or States
or have self-reported violations, and whether they have subsequently received a written EPA or State formal
enforcement action  (e.g., a  consent order or  compliance  agreement) or  an  informal  enforcement response
(e.g., a warning letter or notice of violation (NOV)).
                                                                                           OECM-12
                                                                                           12/89

-------
                           ACTION TRACKING  SYSTEM

As of January 1990, the following OECM projects  are being  tracked  in  the
Action Tracking System.
ACTIVE:
DUE DATE
OECM   50    ANNUAL ENFORCEMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS  REPORT              2/19/90
OECM   51    REVISED RCRA CIVIL PENALTY  POLICY                      2/23/90
OECM   52    MANUAL ON MONITORING ENFORMEMENT DECREES AND ORDERS    1/15/90
OECM   53    CONSOLIDATED NON-APA ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY RULES      9/  4/90
                                                                 OECM-13

-------
Office of General Counsel
FY 1990GOCMS

-------
         OBJECTIVE
OFFICE  OF GENERAL COUNSEL
           FY  1990

                  MEASURE
SPMS CODE FREQUENCY

Identify unresolved legal
barriers associated with
State authorization
applications and propose
options for their
resolution.







Assist program offices in
developing regulations by
ensuring final Red Border
review is accomplished in a
timely manner.










State Delegation Agreement Review
Within 15 days of receipt of a memo from the
Regional Administrator recommending a final Agency
decision on a RCRA State authorization
application, OGC is to:

Notify the submitting Agency office of OGC
concurrence/non-concurrence, or
Negotiate an extention for review with
submitting Agency office if evaluation of
deficiencies in the package require
corrections.
- Report progress in meeting extended deadline.
Red Border Review
OGC will complete its response to Red Border
Review documents within three weeks for at least
80% of the reviews and within a maximum of four
weeks for all reviews.

- Indicate total number of Red Border Review
documents received for concurrence by OGC.
By media, indicate number and percent of Red
Border Review documents reviewed in three
weeks and reviewed in four weeks.
Indicate number of Red Border Review documents
not reviewed in four weeks with explanation.
Indicate total number of Red Border Review
documents not receiving OGC concurrence with
explanation.

GC-1












GC-2















Q
1,2,3,4











Q
1,2,3,4













                                                                                                OGC  - 1
                                                                                                12/89
*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:  1990—719-978/06270

-------