EPA/540/2-89/003
-------
Treatment Process;
Madias
Document References
Document Types
Contacts
Location of Tests
Physical/Chemical - Soil Washing
Soil/Generic
PEI Associates, Inc. "CERCLA BOAT SARM Preparation
and Results of Physical Soils Washing Experiments
(Final Report)." Prepared for U.S.
mately 75 pp. October 1987.
EPA ORD Report
Richard Traver
Staff Engineer
U.S. EPA, ORD
HWERL-Releases Control Branch
¥©odbridge Avenue
Edison, NJ 08837
201-321-6677
SARM - Manufactured Waste (Non-NPL)
- Edison, NJ
This study reports on the results of work preparing 30,000 Ibs
of SARM or synthetic analytical reference matrix, a surrogate Superfund
soil containing a vide range of contaminants. It also reports the results
©f bench scale treatability experiments designed to simulate the EPA
developed mobile soil washing system, where various SARM samples were
physically washed to determine the efficiency of using chelating reagent,
and surfactants to remove contaminants from the SARMs. This work supports
the EPA's Superfund Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) program.
were developed to support testing of
various cleanup technologies in support of the Superfund
Superfund sites were surveyed to evaluate the type of soils present and the
concentrations of contaminant in the soils. The final soil composition
selected consists of 30% clay, 25% silt, 201 sand, 20Z topsoil and 5%
gravel. A prescribed list of chemicals was added to the soils. The
contaminants include volatile and semi-volatile organics, chlorinated
organic compounds and the metals Pbf Zn, Cd, As, Cu, Cr and Mi. Four
different SARM formulations were prepared containing high and low levels of
Lcs. They will be used by the EPA in subsequent
Different solutions containing SARM samples were tested in bench scale
shaker tests to determine the ability of a chelant (EDTA)f a surfactant
(TIDE) and plain water solvent to remove various contaminants from the fine
and coarse fractions of soils. The degree of contamination in both the
eoarse and fine fraction was determined by TCLP tests and total waste
analysis (S¥-8465 3rd edition). A QA/QC discussion is contained in the
report and a complete QA/QC plan is appended.
3/89-42
Quality assurance of data may not be appropriate for all sises.
-------
After samples were treated on the bench scale shaker table
the SARM soils were put through a wet sieve to separate fine from coarse
materials and the fractions were analyzed using TCLP tests and total
analysis. Tap water was as effective in removing the VOC as the other
solutions. The pH and temperature had. very little effect on VOC reduction.
The semi-volatile organics were removed slightly better by the 0.5% TIDE
than plain tap water, A chelant concentration of 3 moles of EDTA to total
metals was most effective in removing-metals, Chelant reaction time for
removal was 15 to 30 minutes. Arsenic and chromium showed the poorest
removal efficiencies while Cd, Zn, Cu and Ni were easily chelated by EDTA.
The soil is divided into three particle size classes > 2 mm, 2 mm to 250 um
and < 250 um. The washes removed contaminants from the two larger classes
of soils to levels below the proposed TCLP limits. These soil classes
comprise 42% by weight of the SARM and could potentially be classified as
non-hazardous and be returned to the site. The contaminated fines could be
stabilised and treated further. This study revealed the SARM could be
cleaned by soils washing and the contaminated soil volume could be reduced.
This report contains an excellent bibliography of soil washing papers.
Analytical data is provided in the treatability study report. The
breakdown of the contaminants by treatability group is?
Treatability Groups
Aromatic Compounds
V03-Halogenated Phenols,
Cresols, Ethers, and
CAS Number
108-90-7
87-86-5
Contaminants
Chlorobenzene
¥04-Halogenated Aliphatic
¥07-Simple Nonpolar
Aromatics and
Heteroeyelics
-Polynuclear Aromatics
-Other Polar Organic
¥10-Non-Volatile Metals
Wll-Volatile Metals
107-06-2
127-18-4
100-42-5
1330-20-7
100-41-4
120-12-7
117-81-7
67-64-1
7440-50-8
7440-02-0
7440-47-3
7439-92-1
7440-66-6
7440-43-9
7440-38-2
s 2-Dichloroethane
Styrene
Xylenes
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Copper
Nickel
Chromium
Lead
Zinc
Arsenic
3/89-42
Document Number: EUQW
of data may not b© appropriate for all uses.
-------
CERCLA BOAT SARM PREPARATION AND RESULTS OF
PHYSICAL SOILS WASHING EXPERIMENTS
(FINAL REPORT)
I
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
incinnati, Ohio 45246-0100
Work Assignment No. 0-7
Richard P. Traver, P.E., Technical Project Monitor
Releases Control Branch
Land Pollution Control Division
Edisons New Jersey 08837
Jennifer Haley
Hazardous Site Control Division
Office of Solid yaste and Emergency Response
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HAZARDOUS WASTE ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 I€ST ST. CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
October 30, 1987
-------
The information in this document has been funded9 wholly or in part, by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-03-3413 (Task
No. 0-7) to PEI Associates,, Inc. It has been subject to the Agency's peer
and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA
document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
11
-------
Today's rapidly developing and changing technologies and industrial
products and practices frequently carry with them the increased generation of
solid and hazardous wastes. These materials, if improperly dealt with9 can
threaten both public health and the environment. Abandoned waste sites and
accidental releases of toxic and hazardous substances to the environment also
have important environmental and public health implications. The Hazardous
Waste Engineering Research Laboratory assists in providing an authoritative
and defensible engineering basis for assessing and solving these problems.
Its products support the policiess programs, and regulations of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); the permitting and other responsibili-
ties of State and local governments; and the needs of both large and small
businesses in handling their wastes responsibly and economically.
The 1984 RCRA Hazardous Substances Waste Act prohibits the continued
land disposal of untreated hazardous wastes beyond specified dates. The
statute requires EPA to set "levels or methods of treatment, if any, which
substantially diminish the toxicity of the waste or substantially reduce the
likelihood of migration of hazardous constituents from the waste so that
short-term and long-term threats to human health and the environment are
The current RCRA schedule is to promulgate best demonstrated available
technology (BOAT) treatment levels for the first third of the RCRA listed
hazardous wastes and Superfund soil and debris by August 1988. This project
was divided into two phases; the first involved the identification and prep-
aration of representative standard analytical reference matrix (SARM) sam-
ples, and the second involved the evaluation of soil washing technologies for
volumetric reduction. These results will be utilized to provide contaminant
pretreatment levels for Superfund wastes prior to land disposal.
Thomas R* Hauser
Director
Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
111
-------
The RCRA Hazardous and Solid Haste Amendments of 1984 prohibit the
The statute requires EPA to set "levels or methods of treatments if any,
which substantially diminish the toxicity of the waste or substantially
reduce the likelihood of migration of hazardous constituents from the waste
so that short-term and long-term threats to human health and the environment
are minimized." The legislation sets forth a series of deadlines at which
times further disposal of particular waste types is prohibited if the Agency
has not set treatment standards under Section 3004(m) or determineds based on
3 case-specific petition, that there will be no migration of hazardous con-
stituents for as long as the wastes remain hazardous.
In addition to addressing future land disposal of specific listed
wastes^ the RCRA land disposal restrictions address the disposal of soil and
debris from CERCLA site response actions as well. Sections 3004(d)(3) and
(e)(3) of RCRA state that the soil/debris waste material resulting from a
Superfund financed response action or an enforcement authority response
action implemented under Sections 104 and 106 of CERCLAS respectively, will
not be subject to the land ban until November 88 1988.
Because Superfund soil/debris waste often differs significantly from
other types of hazardous waste, the U.S. EPA is developing specific RCRA
Section 3004(m) standards or levels for treatment of these wastes. These
standards will establish Best Demonstrated and Available Treatment (BOAT)
levels through the evaluation of five readily available treatment technolo-
gies; namely, soil washing, chemical treatment (KPEG)S thermal desorption,
incinerations and stabilization/fixation. After November 88 .1988, Superfund
wastes in compliance with these regulations may be deposited in land disposal
units? wastes exceeding these levels will be banned from land disposal unless
a variance is issued.
This report details part of the initial work conducted from April to
October 1987 under the Superfund BOAT testing program. In this segment of
the program, a surrogate Superfund soil bearing a wide range of chemical
contaminants typically occurring at Superfund sites was prepared for use
across the board in the BOAT tests (Task 1) and experimental bench tests on
physical washing of the soil surrogate were conducted (Task 2).
The surrogate soil is referred to throughout the text as SARM, which is
an acronym for Synthetic Analytical Reference Matrix. Under Task 1, more
than 30S000 pounds of clean SARM were prepared after considerable research
-------
into the types of soils found at Superfund sites nationwide. The final
composition selected consisted of 30 percent by volume clay (a mixture of
montmoril'linite and kaolinit@)s 25 percent silt, 20 percent sand9 20 percent
topsoil, and 5 percent gravel. The components were air dried to minimize
moisture and then mixed together in two 1-5,000-Ib batches using a standard
truck-mounted 6-yd3 cement/concrete mixer.
A prescribed list of chemicals found to be widely and frequently oc-
curring at Superfund sites was then added to the clean SARM in a series of
smaller-scale mixing operations using a 15-ft3 mortar mixer. Organic chem-
icals added included ethyl benzenes xylene, l82-diehloroethan@9 perchloro-
ethylenes acetone,, chlorobenzene, styrene, anthracenes pentachlorophenol, and
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Salts or oxides of the following metals were
also added: Iead9 zinc9 cadmium, arsenic9 coppers chromium, and nickel.
Because contaminants occur in soils at a wide range of concentrations, four
different SARM formulas containing either high or low levels of organics and
metals were prepared and delivered to the EPA for use in subsequent treata-
bility tests using the five BOAT technologies noted above. Reserves of each
SARM were also packaged and archived for future use. The archived samples
are being stored at EPA's R&D facility in Edison9 New Jersey.
Under Task 2, samples of each SARM were physically washed in a series of
bench-scale experiments designed to simulate the EPA-developed Mobile Soils
Washing (MSW) System. This system is capable of extracting certain contami-
nants from soils* resulting in a volume reduction of the contaminated portion
of the soils. Different wash solutions that were evaluated during the bench-
scale shaker-table experiments included 1) a chelant solution (tetrasodium
salt of EDTA-Dow Chemical Versene 100 ) and 2) an anionic surfactant solution
(phosphated formulation from Procter and Gambles Institutional Formula TIDE ).
Different pH and temperature conditions were evaluated for the wash solutions.
Following the shaker-table wash, the soil solutions were put through a wet
sieve to separate the fines from the coarse material. The resulting soil
fractions were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the soil-washing
technique in separating a clean coarse fraction from a contaminated fine
fraction. The degree of contamination of both fractions was ultimately
determined by toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) tests and
total waste analyses (according to 5^-846, 3rd edition). The results
indicate that tap water was as effective at removing volatile organics as any
of the other wash solutions^ pH and temperature variations had little effect
on the volatile contaminant reduction efficiencies* Reduction efficiencies
for the TCLP volatile organics of up to 99.2 percent were achieved for
particles greater than 0.25 mm in diameter. The semi volatile organics were
removed slightly better by a 0.5 percent solution of TIDE , with no pH or
temperature adjustmentss than by tap water alone. The TCLP semivolatile
contaminants were reduced by up to 93.2 percent for soil particles greater
than 0.25 mms after a 0.5 percent surfactant wash. The same particle size
class achieved a TCLP semivolatile contaminant reduction of up t© 92.9 percent
using tap water alone. A chelant concentration of 3sl moles ©f EDTA to total
moles of metalss without pH or temperature adjustments proved most effective
in reducing the TCLP metal contamination. Reduction efficiencies for the
TCLP metals of up to §3.5 percent were achieved for particles greater than
0.25 mm. Since 42 percent of the SARM is greater than 0.25 mm in diameter, a
42 percent reduction (by weight) in contaminated material was achieved through
the bench scale soil washing experiments of the
-------
CONTENTS
I
Saimer ii
Foreword ii i
Abstract 1v
Figures viii
Tables ix
ledgment xi
Introduction 1-1
1.1 Objectives 1-2
1.2 Summary of approach 1-3
SARM Research and Project Development Background 2-1
2.1 SARH soil matrix 2-1
2.2 SARM chemical contaminants 2-3
3= Bench-Scale SARM Blending Studies and Results 3-1
4. Full-Scale SARM Preparation 4-1
4.1 Objective and summary 4-1
4.2 Phase 1 - mixing of clean soil matrix 4-2
4.3 Phase 2 - blending of SARM 4-4
4.4 SARM packaging and shipping 4-13
4.5 Complications and final mixing procedure 4-15
4.6 Waste handling practices 4-18
4.7 Site decommissioning 4-18
4.8 Analytical profile of full-scale SARM products 4-19
5. Soil Mashing (BOAT Physical Treatment) 5-1
5.1 Introduction 5-1
5.2 Literature review 5-3
5,3 Conclusions 5-9
5 A Recommendations 5-13
5.5 Experimental test design 5-15
5.6 Experimental procedures 5-18
5o7 Phase I results 5-20
5.8 Phase II results 5-24
5.9 Scale-up considerations 5-48
5.10 QA/QC 5-54
vi
-------
• CONTENTS (continued)
Volume II
A Bench-Scale Experiments on SARM Blending A-l
B Statistical Evaluation of SARM Homogeneity B-l
C Results of Chemical and Physical Analyses of Clean SARM C-l
D Phase II Soil Hashing Analytical Results D-l
E Procedures Plan for Full-Scale SARM Preparation E-l
Vll
-------
FIGURES
Number
4-1 SARM Site Diagram 4-6
5-1 Reaction Time - 1:1 Molar Chelant Hash, SARM III 5-21
5-2 Reaction Time - 0.1% Surfactant Wash, SARM I 5-21
5-3 Schematic of the Mobile Soil Washing System 5-51
viii
-------
TABLES
Number Page
2-1 Target Contaminant Concentrations for SARMS 2-6
3-1 Clean SARM Soil Composition 3-2
3-2 Spiked Soil Sample Analysis Results 3-4
3-3 Full-Scale Chemical Doses 3-5
4-1 Quantities and Use of SARM Samples 4-1
4-2 Soil Component Quantities for Full-Scale 4-3
4-3 Results of Clean Soil Matrix Homogeneity Analyses 4-4
4-4 Target High and Low Contaminant Concentrations for
Samples 4-8
4-5 Chemicals Added Per 500-Pound Mix 4-9
4-6 Soil Mixing Time Results 4-10
4-7 Locations, Quantities to be Sent$ and Transportation of
I 4-21
4-9 Analytical Profile of SARM II 4-22
4-10 Analytical Profile of SARM III 4-23
4-11 Analytical Profile of SARM IV 4-24
5-1 Summary ©f Shaker-Table Soils Washing Experiments Reviewed
5-2 Summary of Shaker-Table Soils Washing Experiments Reviewed
- Soils with Metal Contamination 5-5
5-3 Phase I Experimental Test Design 5-17
5-4 Phase II Experimental Test Design 5-18
IX
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number - Page
5-5 Phase I Results: SARM III >2-mm Size Fraction 5-23
5-6 Phase II Results: SARM III 250-ym to 2-nm Size Fraction 5-23
5-7 Phase I Results: SARM I 250-ym to 20mm Size Fraction 5-23
5-8 Phase II Prewash Results SARM I (High Organic,, Low Metal
Contamination) 5-26
5-9 Phase II Prewash Results SARM II (Low Organic, Low Metal
Contamination) 5-28
5-10 Phase II Prewash Results SARM III (Low Organic, High Metal
Contamination) 5-29
5-11 Phase II Prewash Results SARM I (High Organic, High Metal
5-31
5-12 Phase II Results: SARM I (High Organies, Low Metals) 5-32
5-13 Phase II Results: SARM II (Low Organicss Low Metals) 5-33
5-14 Phase II Results: SARM III (Low Organics, High Metals) 5-34
5-15 Phase II Results: SARM IV (High Organicss High Metals) 5-35
5-16 SARM II Experimental Run 1, 2 mm to 250 pm Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
5-38
5-17 SARM IV Experimental Run 3S 2 mm to 250 pm Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Is 5-39
5-18 SARM II Experimental Run 1, 2 mm to 250 pm Soil Fraction
Experimental Run 3, 2 mm to 250 ym Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Volatile Organics 5-
II Experimental Run 1, 2 mm to 250 pm Soil Fraction
Soil Natrix Spike/Hatrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Semivolatile Organics 5-
IV Experimental Run 39 2 mm to 250 pm Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
s 5-
-------
TABLES (continued)
5-22 Phase II Results: SARM III (Low Organics, High Metals) 5-45
5-23 Phase II Results: SARM IV (High Organics, High Metals) 5-46
5-24 SARM II Experimental Run 1, 2 mm to 250 ym Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Is 5-55
5-25 SARM IV Experimental Run 39 2 mm to 250 pm Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Metals 5-55
5-26 SARM II Experimental Run 1, 2 mm to 250 ym Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
s 5-56
«3 W ttJ w
5-27 SARM IV Experimental Run 3, 2 mm to 250 ym Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Volatile Organics 5-57
5-28 SARM II Experimental Run 1, 2 mm to 250 ym Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Volatile Organics 5-58
5-27 SARM IV Experimental Run 39 2 mm to 250 ym Soil Fraction
Soil Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery for
Semi volatile Organics 5-58
XI
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This report was prepared by PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati's Ohio, as
part of the work conducted for the U.S. EPA Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory (HWERL) under Contract No. 68-03-3413, Work Assignment
No. 7, Mr. Richard Traver8 of HWERL's Releases Control Branch in Edison,
Jersey, was the EPA Technical Project Monitor.
PEI's S, Robert Cochran and M. Pat Esposito were responsible for manag-
ing this project and preparing this report under the direction of Mr. Jack S.
Grebers Director of PEI's Waste Management Division. Principal investigators
and coauthors included Mr. Cochran and Ms. Espositos as well as several key
individuals, namely Ms, Claudia Furmans Ms. Barbara Locke8 Ms. Judy Hessling,
Mr. Doug Baileys Mr. Lou Brack, and Mr. William Parker.
-* " »
PEI is very grateful for the technical support and guidance given
throughout the course of the work by Mr. Richard Traver of EPA-Edison-HWERL;
Mr. John Cunningham, Mr. Jim Antizzos and Ms. Jennifer Haley of EPA-HQ-OERR;
Mr. Robert Thurnau of EPA-Ci-HHERL; Ms. Joan Knapp? Ms. Trish Kenneys and Mr.
James Nash of Camp, Dresser and McKee; and Ms. Murial Haller of Converse
Environmental. The assistance provided by these professionals is sincerely
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The 198.4 RCRA Hazardous Substances Waste Act prohibits the continued
land disposal of untreated hazardous wastes beyond specified dates. The
statute requires EPA to set "levels or methods of treatments if anys which
substantially diminish the toxieity of the waste or substantially reduce the
likelihood of migration of hazardous constituents from the waste so that
short-term and long-term threats to human health and the environment are
minimized."
The legislation sets forth a series of deadlines with hammer provisions,
At the deadlines^ further disposal of the particular waste is prohibited if
the Agency has not set treatment standards under Section 3004(m) or deter-
mined,, based on a case-specific petitions that there will be no migration of
hazardous constituents for as long as the wastes remain hazardous.
The current RCRA schedule is to promulgate best demonstrated available
technology (BOAT) treatment levels for the first third of the listed hazard-
ous wastes by August 1988 (all F & K wastes). Since these wastes (and asso-
exemption expires in November 1988, they should be included within the scope
of Superfund BOAT testing.
Some wastes generated through CERCLA responses are known to be similar
to wastes regulated under RCRA; in view of this, the RCRA BOAT research and
1-1
-------
results will be directly applicable to these CERCLA wastes and additional
research of treatability of these wastes is not included-in this effort.
However, much of the waste generated during CERCLA responses consists of
contaminated soil and debris which is significantly different in nature than
most RCRA wastes. Consequently, an evaluation of BOAT for contaminated soil
and debris material is necessary for the purposes of CERCLA/SARA compliance
with the proposed 1988 Land Ban. These BOAT "treatability" levels are in-
tended to provide the user community with performance information on five
technologies: incineration^ low-temperatore desorption9 chemical treatment,
physical (washing) treatment9 and solidification/stabilization. These target
clean levels are reported in toxic contaminant leaching potential (TLCP)
1.1
Task 1 of this Work Assignment was to prepare a means for comparison of
the five BOAT treatment technologies for contaminated soil and debris, thus
allowing an evaluation of BOAT efficiencies and the determination of their
treatability levels. In order to accomplish this objectives a reference
material "representative of Superfund wastes" was to be prepared. Due to the
wide variability of wastes found at Superfund sites, it was determined that
for the initial treatability studies four different SARMs would be prepared
certain typts of wastes.
Task 2 of this Work Assignment was to evaluates, using the new SARMs, the
EPA-developed Mobile Soils Hashing System technology as a means ©f treating
(or pretreating) Superfund site contaminated soils. This BOAT evaluation was
1-2
-------
to be conducted using bench-scale components and was to determine the validi-
ty of the four assumptions that underlie the volume reduction approach of
soils washings specifically that:
1. A significant fraction of the BOAT SARM contaminants are attached
to the silts humuss and clay particles.
2. The contaminated silt and clay are attached to the sand and gravel
by physical processes (primarily compaction/adhesion).
3. Physical cleaning/scrubbing of the sand/gravel/rock fraction will
effectively remove the contaminated very fine sand9 silt and clay
sized (0.1 to 0.002 mm) material from the coarse material.
4. The contaminants will be removed to the same extent that the silt
and clay are separated (i.e., increasing the efficiency of the
scrubbing process will directly increase the removal efficiency for
the majority of the BOAT contaminant mix).
5. Water, with minor additives (i.e., pH? chelatess. and surfactants to
aid fines migration,, etc.) would be the only solvent necessary for
l.r SUMMARY OF APPROACH
The technical approach for completion of Task 1 under the Superfund BOAT
project is best summarized in terms of the following three subtask work
areas:
1) CERCLA data base review and literature search
2) Bench-scale study
ii-
The initial steps of the project involved an extensive research effort and
data base review to collect information on soil conditions that are typically
found at CERCLA sites, and to identify those chemical contaminants and their
concentrations most frequently detected in these soils. With this informa-
tion , the project peer review team decided on what the composition of the
clean soil matrix would be9 along with the representative chemicals that
1-3
-------
The next step in the approach for Task 1 involved conducting a bench-
scale study to 1} determine the specific soil components and their quantities
needed to manufacture a clean soil matrix that met the criteria of a
"typical" Superfund site soil, and 2) determine the quantities of the repre-
sentative chemicals that would have to be blended with the soil to reach
predesignated SARM contaminant levels.
The final step of Task 1 was the implementation of the full-scale opera-
tions during which time 309000 1b of SARM were blended9 packaged; and shipped
to several different predetermined locations.
The primary objective of Task 2 is to conduct a bench-scale physical
soil washing of the SARM which simulates the EPA-developed Mobile Soil Wash-
ing System (MSWS). Therefores the primary considerations in the design of
the physical soil-washing experiments are the operating conditions of the
MSWS. PEI8 in C3njurction with EPA, designed a series of bench-scale shaker-
tube experiments which simulate the main components of the MSWS. The bench-
scale soil-washing experiments utilized a shaker tube to simulate the drum
washer agitation and contact mechanism. This provided the soil-to-solution
contact and agitation necessary to mobilize the fines. The soil solution was
then poured through a wet sieve containing 10- (2-mm) and 60-mesh (2§0-ym)
screens, and rinsed with a high-pressure water sprayer* This effectively
simulated the drum screen and water knife present in the MSWS which provides
for maximum physical soil separation. Each soil size (+10-mesh, 10- to
60-mesh, and less than 60-mesh) was then analyzed to determine the level of
contaminant removal. The MSSsfS utilized a 10-mesh screen only; however, the
60-mesh screen was also used in these experiments to determine whether a
larger volume reduction can be realized by using a smaller screen.
-------
The analytical plan provides for both prewash and post-wash analysis of
all contaminants present in the SARM in each of the three soil size classifi-
cations. These analyses will determine the effectiveness of the soil-washing
technique for reducing the volume of contaminated material. Furthermore, all
three soil size classifications will undergo TCLP analysis to further evalu-
ate the appropriateness of landfill ing (over otherwise treating) the soil-
washing residues.
1-5
-------
2
SARM RESEARCH AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND
An extensive literature review and compilation of data were performed,
as part of this projects to identify those soil types and hazardous constitu-
ents that most frequently occur at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. As
part of this background research, the contractor utilized information that
had already been collected and reported by EPA/OERR as part of another,
ongoing RCRA BOAT development project. The following section discusses the
overall research effort conducted in support of the BOAT SARM work8 and
identifies the basic information and data that were used to develop proce-
dures for both the bench and full-scale operations utilized in preparing the
2.1 SARM SOIL MATRIX
The background research associated with development of the "clean" soil
matrix focused on identifying 1) the critical soil characteristics which
would impact removal or treatment efficiencies, and 2) a range of values for
those parameters that would meet the objectives of the project. In working
toward these goalss the contractor worked closely with EPA/OERR in assessing
data that had already been compiled on soil groups found at NPL sites. In
additions the contractor reviewed numerous other sources of CERCLA site
information for the purpose of supplementing EPA/OERR's data and conclusions,
The following reports and information sources were reviewed:
2-1
-------
The Effects of Clay Mineralogy on the BDAT Surrogate Soil Matrix"
(COM April 1987)
0 Treatment of Contaminated Soils with Aqueous Surfactants-Interim
Report" (Ellis and Payne 9/1985)
0 Records of Decision for 151 CE&CLA sites
0 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service data base
0 "Cleaning Contaminated Excavated Soil Using Extraction Agents"
(Foster Wheeler Corp. 9/1986)
0 "Most Frequently Identified Compounds/Metals at Hazardous Waste
Sites" (COM 1987)
0 "Patterns of Soil Contamination and Composition on NPL Sites -
Draft Summary" (EPA date unknown)
Ten soil parameters were examined and assessed in terms of their quanti-
tative values in real and typical Superfund site soilss and in terms of their
potential affect on the five candidate treatment technologies. These param-
eters were as follows:
0 Texture ° Moisture content
0 Mineralogy ° Permeabil
0 Cation exchange capacity ° Porosity
o
0 oH ° Structure
The result of this assessment was the identification of those soil
parameters that would be most critical in the SARM development. Once these
critical parameters were identified, quantitative values for them were estab-
lished based on real-world conditions and individual technology capabilities.
The following parameters and associated values and/or descriptions served as
criteria in the selection of a soil type to be used in the development of the
Grain size distribution (texture)
25 to 40 percent sand (mix of fin@s medium and coarse)
25 to 40 percent silt
25 to 40 percent clay
5 to 10 percent pebbles and cobbles (no particle to exceed
2-inch diameter)
10 to 15 percent top soil (organic matter included)
Sands (siliceous) - Clay (either montmorillornte8
raontmorillornti, kaolinitic9 11 lite)
Silt (mixture of sand and clay compositions)
2-2
-------
Cation exchange capacity (CEC): moderate, 30 to 50 meq/100 g
Total organic carbon (TOC): 3 to 6 percent
pH: 5,0 to 8.0
Moisture content: 10 to 20 percent on completion of blending
It should be noted that the grain size distribution criteria presented
above were modified during the bench-scale study from percentages by weight
to percentages by volume. This modification changed the target soil compo-
nent distribution to the following"
0 15 to 25 percent sand
0 15 to 25 percent silt
0 20 to 35 percent clay
° 10 to 20 percent topsoil
0 5 to 10 percent gravel
2.2
The background research associated with the identification of indicator
chemicals or analytes and the target concentrations for use in the SARM's
development was conducted by EPA/OERR. The objective of this effort wis tc
identify contaminant groups9 and indicator chemicals for those groups, that
were most representative of CERCLA/SARA wastes.
The three basic contaminant groups identified as being frequently found
in Superfund site soil and debris are volatile organicss semivolatile organ-
ies* and metals. The selection of representative analytes for each group was
based on an analysis of the physical and chemical properties of each com-
pound. The physical properties examined to aid in selecting representative
Henry's Law constant
2-3
t.
-------
0 Partition coefficient
0 Soil absorption coefficient
Based on the previously listed properties as defined by EPA/OERR and
records of contaminants encountered at Superfund sites9 a listing was devel-
oped of 48 substances occurring most frequently at Superfund sites.
The next step in the research effort was to evaluate each of the 48
substances and their associated physical properties relative to the affect
each would have on the performance of the five selected treatment technolo-
gies. The result was a proposed list of compounds that represented the most
frequently occurring hazardous compounds at Superfund sitess and that also
provided a challenging test matrix for all five treatment technologies. The
final list of chemical contaminants chosen for the SARH studies is as fol-
1 ows :
Volatile Organies
l92-Dich1oreethane
Isl9292-Tetrachloroethylene
Semi-Volatile Organies
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Is
Cadmium
2-4
-------
Four contaminant formulations or "blends" were then selected for the
development of the four SARMs to accommodate the technology limitations and
performance of the five selected BOAT technologies:
(1) High organicSg low metals
(2) Low organics9 low metals
(3) Low organics, high metals
(4) High organicss high metals
The final step in this research process was to examine the levels at
which these chemicals have been found at Superfund sites and select concen-
trations that are representative of contaminated soils and debris. EPA/OERR
compiled average concentrations and maximum concentrations of each selected
chemical and calculated the percentage of each compound within its group.
From these datas target contaminant concentrations for the SARM development
were devised. Table 2-1 presents the selected target levels used for the
purpose of preparing the four SARMs outlined below:
1: High levels of organics (20S000 ppm volatiles plus 10.
semivolatiles) and low levels of metals (1S000 ppm total metals).
2° Low levels of organics (2S000 ppm volatiles plus 1,000 ppm semi-
volatiles) and low levels of metals (1,000 ppm total metals).
3: Low levels of organics (2,000 ppm volatiles plus 18000 ppm semi-
volatiles) and high levels of metals (509000 ppm total metals).
4: High levels of organics (209000 ppm volatiles plus 10,(
semivolatiles) and high levels of metals (50*000 ppm total metals)
2-5
-------
TABLE 2-1. TARGET
Contaminant
Volatiles
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
1,2-Dlchloroethane
1 s 1 S2 $2-Tetrachl oroethyl ene
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Styrene
Semivolatiles
Anthracene
PCP
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Metals
Pb
Zn
Cd
As
Cu
Cr
N1
Ratio ,
percent
16
41
3
3
34
2
1
100
65
10
25
100
28
45
2
1
19
3
2
Hi (ppm)
38200
89200
600
600
69800
400
200
20*000
6,500
1S000
2S500
109000
14S000
229500
19000
500
99500
1,500
19000
Low (ppm)
320
820
60
60
680
40
20
2,000
650
100
250
1S000
280
450
20
10
190
30
30
50S000 1,
2-6
-------
SECTION 3
BENCH-SCALE SARM BLENDING STUDIES AND RESULTS
A series of bench-scale experiments were conducted at PEI's laboratories
to determine 1) the specific component formula for the clean SARM soil, 2)
the quantities of contaminants that would have to be added to the clean SARM
soil to achieve detectable levels of the contaminants at the designated
levels, and 3) the procedures by which the contaminants would be added to the
clean SARM during full-scale blending operations. Details of the experiments
can be found in Appendix A. Highlights of the studies are presented in this
section.
Supplies of various soil components (sands gravel, silt, top soil9 and a
variety of clay samples) and target chemicals were brought to PEI's Cincin-
nati laboratory for the bench-scale studies. Several small batches of syn-
thetic soil were prepared using various proportions of the above materials
and analyzed for physical properties such as particle size distribution,
cation exchange capacity (CEC)9 X-ray diffraction, clay composition^ total
organic carbon (TOC)9 percent moisture* and pH. Based on the results of
these experinssnts and extensive discussions with EPA and others„ the formula
shown in Table 3-1 for the clean SARM soil was chosen because it best fit the
set of characteristics typified by most Superfund soils.
3-1
-------
TABLE 3-1. CLEAN SARM SOIL COMPOSITION
Soil component
Sand
Gravel (No. 9)
Silt
Top soil
n au
LI t ay
- Montmorillonite
- Kaolinite
Volume %
20.0
5.0
25.0
20.0
•sfi n
•9U. U
(7.5)
I22JJ.
100.0
Weight %
31.4
5.7
28.3
19.8
1 A 8
I4? «O
(5.4)
100.0
Analysis of bench-scale preparation of the clean SARM formula shown
Table 3-1 showed the following set of physical properties:
Cation exchange capacity (Na), meq/100 g 30.99 30.09 34.5
Grain size distributions
weight % sand 48, 48
weight % gravel 79 6
weight % silt 33t 33
weight % clay 12, 13
Moisture content Mot analyzed, expected to
be less than or equal
to 5%
Using small quantities (i.e., 750-g batches) of the clean SARM soil, a
series of spiking experiments were conducted to determine the optimum dosages
for each contaminant t© achieve the desired target levels. This was done
3f concerns over potential volatile losses during full-scale
recoveries during analysis. Three samples were spited at 100 percent of the
theoretical target dose9 three at 120 percent, and three at 140 percent, for
a total of nine samples.
3-2
-------
The results of the spiked sample analyses,, presented in Table 3-2, indi-
cated that most of the organics would need to be added te the SARf^ soil at
120 to 140 percent of the theoretical dosage to achieve the desired residual
target levels. Acetone would need to be dosed at about 175 percent of theo-
retical , and !82-dichloroethane at 167 percent of theoretical to achieve the
desired levels.
Host of the residual metal concentrations were close to target at 120 to
140 percent of theoretical dosage, with two exceptions. Nickel residuals
measured only 40 to 50 percent of the desired level, regardless of dosage,
and chromium was only detectable at very low ppm levels. This poor result
for chromium was believed to be due to the form in which Cr was added (i.e.s
as Crp03 anhydrouSj, and insoluble in the acid digestion procedure used in
sample preparation). To correct this situations a more soluble Cr salt
Cr(NOJ.,'9H90 was purchased for full-scale spiking. No cause for the low
*5 vS fct
nickel residual was determined.
The data also indicated that the styrene target level needed to be
increased from 200 to 1000 ppm at the high level and 20 to 100 ppm at the low
level. This was necessary to make the styrene detectable during analysis.
Apparently, the sample dilution necessary for analysis of the relatively high
levels of xylsne in the SARM made the styrene undeteetable during analysis.
Based on the data in Table 3-2„ the doses for each chemical to be added
to the clean SARM during full-scale operations were selected. See Table 3-3.
The third phase of the bench-scale experiments was focused on determin-
ing the order of addition of chemicals to the clean SARM. Using solubility
and compatibility data as guideliness a series of premixing tests revealed
that all of the organics could be premixed together before addition to the
3-3
-------
TABLE 3-2. SPIKED SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Sample identification and dosage
100% dosage
Contaminant
VoSatiles
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
Tetrachloro-
s frfytw 1 fflft®
-------
TABLE 3-3. FULL-SCALE CHEMICAL DOSES
Dose %
Chemical (of theoretical)
120
Xylene 120
Chlorobenzene
Acetone 175
1,2-dichloroethane
100
Bis(2-ethylhexy1)phtha1ate 140
Pentachlorophenol 100
Pb (as Pb SOJ 120
Zn (as ZnO) 120
Cd [as SCc^SOj'SHgO] 130
As (as As203) ' 150
Cu (as CuSOj 14G
Ni [as Ni(N03)»6H20] 120
Cr [as Cr(N03)3«9H20]a 100
a
Changed form of Cr from Cr203 to Cr(N03)3 because Cr203 was
virtually insoluble during the analytical procedure and only
3-5
-------
1, except for the anthracene, which would have to be added in its dry
powder form. The soluble metal salts of nickel nitrates, copper su1fate9
cadmium sulfates and chromium nitrate could be predissolved in water and
added as a solution to achieve optimal distribution throughout the SARM,
However9 the insoluble metals compounds of arsenic trioxides laad sulfate9
and zinc oxide would have to be added in dry form as powders.
Another series of bench-scale tests were conducted to determine the
optimal mixing order for preparing the SARM. That is, we wanted to know:
0 Whether chemicals should be added to the soils9 or soils added to
the chemicals
0 Whether chemicals should be applied to certain soil fractions
(e.g,9 to the sand or clay fraction) before being blended with the
remainder of the soil matrix
0 The method of chemical application t© the soil (e.g.» sprayed.
0 The order of application (e.g., organics first, followed b/ metals,
or visa versa)
The results of this series of bench tests led to the following conclusions
for full-scale mixing procedures:
1) Chemicals would be added to the soil (not visa versa) as the. mixing
II
avoid a "balling-up" effect on the soil.
3) Dry chemicals would be added first and allowed to mix thoroughly.
V
5) The liquid organic mixture would be added last, and the mixing time
following addition of the liquid organics would be held to a mini-
mum (e,gos about 2 minutes for subsequent small, bench-scale prepa-
rations of SARM9 and 5 to 15 minutes for full scale).
3-6
-------
\ j
Following completion of the bench-scale tests, a procedures plan for
full-scale SARM preparation was written and submitted to.the TPM for approv-
al. It was closely followed throughout the full-scale operations, although
some alterations had to be made. The procedures manual can be found in
ix E.
3-7
-------
SECTION 4
FULL-SCALE SARM PREPARATION
volatile organics plus 10,
total metal So
volatile ©rganics plus 1
total metals.
4.1 OBJECTIVE
The objective of the full-scale SARM blending operation was to prepare
the following quantities of SARMs for use by the five EPA-selacted
technologies and archiving for possible future use (Table 4-1).
TABLE 4-1. QUANTITIES AND USE OF SARM SAMPLES
BOAT
Incineration
Stabilization
Thermal desorption
Chemical treatment
Physical treatment
Archive
Other reserve
Totals
(SARM 1)
High a
organics ,•
low metals
(lb)
12,000
100
50
50
50
500
<250
138000
(SARM 2}
Low
f^V*f¥Stt'VS*f
organ iCS s
low metals
(lb)
12,000
100
50
50
50
500
<250
13S000
(SARM 3)
Low
tf*l fc^^S 3 ffS *! £" ff
OrganiCS j
high metals
Ob)
0
100
50
50
50
500
<250
1000
(SARM 4)
High
rt w rf"i s (ft ^ f" ^
organ i CS
high metals
(lb)
0
100
50
50
50
500
<250
1000
4-1
-------
,-'"'••- The full-scale operations were conducted in two phases:
Phase I - Mixing of Clean Soil Matrix
0 Phase II - Blending of SARH Samples
Phase I included mixing a total of 30,710 pounds of soil components into a
homogeneous soil matrix. This was done at the Oeder Sand and Gravel Company,
located in Morrow9 Ohio on July 4 and 5S 1987. The clean soil mix was pack-
aged in c1eans epoxy-lined §5-gallons open-head steel drums (500 ±0.5 pounds
of soil each) and shipped to EPA's Center Hill Research Facility, where Phase
II was conducted. Phase II entailed the blending of the clean soil matrix
with the selected chemical contaminants, yielding the four SARMs. This work
was completed over a 4=week period (July 13 through August 10, 1987). The
procedures plan (Appendix E) developed under the bench-scale phase of this
project was closely followed over the course of full-scale operations„ al-
' ";, though some adjustments were necessary, as described in the following subsec-
tions.
4.2 PHASE 1 - MIXING OF CLEAN SOIL
A total of 30S710 pounds of soil matrix components were mixed together
to form the soil matrix that was used for the preparation of the SARM sam-
ples. Table 4-2 indicates the source and quantity of each soil component
that was used in the full-scale soil mixing. A cement mixer8 having a rated
capacity of 6 cubic yardss was used to blend the soil in two identical
15s355-lb batches (subsequently referred to as Batches 1 and 2).
For each 158355-pound batch the components were either weighed using a
commercial truck scale (±20 pounds) ©r preweighed by the supplier (commer-
cially-prepared and bagged clays). Bulk materials (sands gravel and top
soil) were transferred into the cement mixer by means of a conveyor-belt
4-2
-------
lift. The clay components were added directly to the mixer from 50-1b bags.
The soil components were then mixed„ by normal rotation of the mixer, for
approximately 1 hour. Following the thorough mixing, the clean soil matrix
was dispensed into 55-gallon drums to 500 ±0.5 pounds net weight,
TABLE 4-2. SOIL COMPONENT QUANTITIES FOR FULL-SCALE
Soil component
Gravel (No. 9)
Sand
Silt
Clay
- Bentonite
- Kaolinite
Topsoil
a Quantities bas«
silt - 28.29%!
Total Quantity
quantity per
(Ib) batch Source/location
1,760 880 Oeder Sand & Gravel Co . /Morrow, OH
9,680 4,840 Oeder Sand & Gravel Co. /Morrow, OH
8,680 48340 Oeder Sand & Gravel Co. /Morrow, OH
1,650 825 American Colloid Co./Skokie9 Ilb
2S900 19450 Charles B. Chrystal & Co. /Brooklyn, NY
6S400 3,020 Oeder Sand & Gravel Co. /Morrow, OH
30,710 I5S355
*d on the following recipe: gravel - S.7%; sand - 31.47%;
bentonite clay - 5.37%; kaolinite clay - 9.35%; top-soil
19.81%. Recipe finalized by peer review committee on 6/16/87,
Actual source of bentonite is Mississippi.
c Actual source of kaolinite is Georgia.
confirm homogeneity of the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil
mix. Five sausples were collected at random from each batch (for a total of
10 samples) and analyzed for cation exchange capacity (CEC); three of the
five samples collected at random from each batch (a total of six samples)
were also analyzed for grain size distributions TOC8 and pH8 Ths results of
these analyses are presented in Table 4-3. One of the samples was analyzed
1-3
-------
for the hazardous substance list (HSL) to identify any contaminants that may
have been present in the soil prior to the SARM blending operation. Results
of this analysis are presented in Appendix E. Organic analyses showed no
volatile or semivolatile compounds at the yg/kg level; metals analysis showed
appreciable quantities of iron9 potassium9 aluminum,, calciums and magnesium
(as would be expected), but no substantial amounts of the more toxic metals
(e.g., chromes nickel, Iead8 zinc). In other wordss the clean SARM is free
TABLE 4-3, RESULTS OF CLEAN SOIL MATRIX HOMOGENEITY ANALYSES
Sample
Batch No.
CEC meq/100 g
TOC %
pH S.U.
Grain size
distribution
Gravel
Sand
Silt
Clay
1
1
117.5
3.2
8.0
I
3
55
29
13
2
2
152.5
3.9
9.0
2
57
30
11
3
2
150
3.0
8.5
4
58
27
11
4
1
150
3.8
8.5
3
54
30
13
5
1
77.5
2.8
9,0
2
56
28
14
6
2
150
2.7
8.0
3
57
27
13
7 8 9 10
211 2
155 80 147.5 147.5
„
„
«,
„
- - - -
a "-" - Sample not analyzed for parameter
4.3 PHASE 2 - BLENDING OF SARM
Activities
Phase 2 of the full-scale operation involved the blending of various
amounts of eh@m1cals with the clean soil matrix to form the four different
blends. Prior to the actual blending operations, facilities and equip-
date. A containment shed was constructed to provide shelter from the ele-
ments, security for the equipment, and containment of chemicals and contami-
nated materials. See Figure 4-1 for a floor plan of the containment shed and
-------
surrounding area. A. 16-cubic-foot mortar mixer was delivered to the site and
modified by installing a 5-horsepower explosion-proof electric motor8 amd
mounted on an elevated stationary foundation; the grated cover was replaced
with a so1id8 hinged cover. Work benches were built inside the shed9 a
custom fume hood was constructed around the mixer9 and explosion-proof wiring
2
installed and inspected. An exhaust fan (100 ft /min) and activated carbon
filter were installed to ventilate the fume hood and clean the air of
fugitive volatile and dust emissions from the mixer. The fume hood was
completely lined with polyethylene film to facilitate decontamination at
decommissioning of the site. The floor of the shed was covered with vinyl
flooring and all joints and edges were sea1ed9 to aid in containment in the
event of a spill.
Two drums of clean sand were brought to the site and used in a "dry run"
of the mixing precedes. The results of this test identified certain changes
these were the installation of masonite sheeting over the vinyl flooring, to
change in the planned drum-handling procedure^ and a reduction of the antici
The clean soil matrix (Phase 1, Section 4,2} was delivered to the Center
Hill, facility in 55-gallon drums on July 1, A licensed hazardous waste
transport trailer (Tonawanda Tank Transport) was delivered to the site to be
used for temporary storage of the SARMs and eventual shipment of 249000
pounds of SARMs to the John Zink Co. incineration facility in Tu1sas Oklahoma,
A front-end loader (CASE 1835), to be used for handling drums outside the
sheds was rented for the duration of Phase 2. Chemicals necessary to begin
4-5
-------
OLD LYSIMETSRS
O
electric power
UJ
£
UJ
X
WORKBENCHES
HANDUNG
SIDING DOOR
£E
{3
UJ
Figure 4-1. SARM Site Diagram.
-------
blending were in storage at Center Hill from the beginning of
bench-scale development.
4=3.2 Full-Scale Chemical Quantities and'SARM Mixing Time
Table 4-4 indicates the target high and low contaminant concentrations
for the SARM samples [reflecting revised (increased) styrene target levels].
The quantities of each chemical that were added to each 500-pound batch to
achieve the target concentrations of the four SARMs (as determined through
bench-scale testing) are presented in Table 4-5. Section 4=3.3 discusses the
various premixtures of chemicals that were prepared before being added to the
soi]s and the specific blending procedures that were followed over the course
of the full-scale operation. ,
The mixing time necessary to achieve a homogenous blend of soil and
chemicals was determined during the preparation of the first SARM batch
(SARM-IV-1). This determination was made based en the results of analyses of
a series of samples collected at mixing-time intervals of 68 12, and 18
minutes following the addition of all contaminants* Six samples were col-
lected after each 6 minutes of mixing and analyzed for copper^ lead, and
purgeable organic carbon (POC).
The analytical results obtained for the 6-$ 12-s and 18-minute samples
(Table 4-6) indicated no statistically significant difference between the
sets and 12 minutes was selected as the mix duration for all remaining SARM
batches. A iymuary of this statistical analysis is presented in Appendix B.
The chemicals used during the full-scale SARM blinding operations were
transferred from the designated flanmable materials storage vault (located at
the Center Hill facility) to the mixing shed for premixing prior to their
addition to the soil matrix. As determined during the bench-scale
4-7
-------
TABLE 4-4, TARGET
Contaminant
Volatiles
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
ls2=Dichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethyl
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Styrene
Semivolatiles
Anthracene
PCP
Bis (2-ethy1hexyl)Phthal
Metals
Lead (Pb)
Zinc (Zn)
Cadmium (Cd)
Arsenic (As)
Copper (Cu)
Chromium (Cr)
Nickel (N1)
Proportions
(*)'
15
39
3
lene 3
33
2
5
100
65
10
late 25
100
28
45
2
1
19
3
2
100
High (ppm) Low (ppm)
3,200 320
8,200 820
600 60
600 60
6,800 680
400 40
19000 100
209800 2,080
6S500 650
19000 100
29500 250
10,000 19000
14S000 280
22 , 500 450
18000 20
500 10
9S500 190
1,500 30
18000 30
50 . 000 19000
Styrene levels were increased five-fold at the recommendation of PEI's
analytical lab to make styrene detectable during analysis. The relatively
high levels of xylene were masking styrene GC peaks at the previously rec-
ommended levels of 200 and 20 ppm. See Page 3-3.
-------
TABLE 4-5. CHEMICALS ADDED PER 500-POUND MIX
High concern Low concen-
Contaminant tratlons trations
!92-Di
Ethyl benzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene
Semlvolatiles
I, IV) (SARM II, III)
atiles
3,408 ml
181 ml
19005 ml
119 ml
249 ml
2,595 ml
18 ml
100 ml
12 ml
25 ml
260 ml
806 ml 81 ml
227 g 23 ml
III.IV) (SARH I, II)
As203 225 g 4.5 g
3CdS04»8H2Oa 670 g 13.4 g
CuS04-§H20 11,875 kg 237,5 g
•I20a 2S620 g 52.4 g
i20a 1,345 g 26.9 g
4,835 g 96.7 g
79635 g 152.5 g
-------
TABLE 4-6. SOIL MIXING TIHE RESULTS
12 18 6 12 18 6 12
15,068 9SI63 5.
2,254 1,317 3,
168083 15,801 189262 9,589.
12,766 18,481 149010 89412
11,876 14,373 168956 68923
17,463 17,150 12,896 9S974
16S555 159738 15,842 !08707
10,725 11,974 169276 7,100
Mean 149245 15S586 15,374 8,784
Standard deviation 29802 2,254 19570 1S562
9,799
11,191
9,326
109105
108001
7,113
99589
19360
9,744
8,238
9S678
79583
9,694
9,752
9,115
956
2S490
39010
18350
3,540
2,080
59470
2,990
19430
13,300
29410
3,965
9,540
6,160
3,690
6,511
4,163
98390
9,930
7,260
14,000
3,590
5,155
8922I
3,727
a As porgeable organic carbon (POC). POC of uncontamiraated (clean) soil was 10.7 pg/g.
Coefficient of variation (CV) .= standard deviation % mean.
NOTE: Metal analyses were done by EPA-Cincinnati; POC by PEI Laboratory.
-------
activities, chemicals could be premixed as three contaminant mixtures and
one» single chemical additive. These four additives were as follows:
Additive No. 1 - a dry mixture of insoluble metal powders consisting of
arsenic trioxide (As203), lead sulfate (PbSO^K and zinc oxide (ZnO)
Addjrtive No. 2 - anthracene (insoluble dry solid)
Additive No. 3 - an aqueous solution of nickel nitrate [Ni(N03)2'6H20)]s
copper sulfate [CuS(V5H20]9 cadmium sulfate [3CdSOu»8H20], and chromium
nitrate [Cr(N03)3-9H2OJ
itive No. 4 - a mixture of organic liquids consisting of ethylben-
zene, xylene, 1,2-dichloroethanes I9ls2s2-tetrachloroethylene$ acetone,
(mono) chlorobenzene9 styrene9 bis(2-ethyhexyl)phthalate and dissolved
Using the quantities presented in Table 4-59 Additive Nos. 1, 39 and 4
were prepared prior to beginning each SARM batch. Additive No. 2 required no
These premixes were prepared in a number of different ways during the
course of SARM preparation. Each method is believed to yield equivalent
results and merely reflect lessons of time/motion management and practical
application learned during the mixing operations.
The metal oxide mixtures (Additive No, 1) were exclusively prepared by
weighing out the appropriate amount of each compound for each 500-pound
batch. These compounds were then added to the dry soil prior t© the addition
of any liquid component,, Similarly8 anthracene (Additive No. 2) was weighed
With the mixer turning the dry soi18 all dry chemical additives were placed
into the mixer and allowed to distribute themselves. This procedure proved
to be devastating to tha mortar mixer (designed t© mix wet components) and
was not followed during any subsequent batches.
-------
The aqueous metal solutions (Additive No. 3) were prepared by dissolving
the appropriate mass of each water soluble ingredient in-a minimal amount of
water in an appropriately sized container" (55 gallons for high metal, 1/2
gallon for low metal batches). The contents were stirred and water added„ as
necessary, until the salts were completely dissolved. During the first few
batches, this aqueous metal solution was added to the dry soil (and metals)
already in the mixer. It was later determined that this was also detrimental
to the equipment by creating binding and another change in procedure was
Alternately, solid soluble salts for low-metal SARM were added directly
to approximately 10 gallons of water already in the mortar mixer and allowed
to dissolve in it with the aid of agitation by the turning mixer blades.
Following sufficient time to dissolve the metal salts, the dry soil/dry
chemical mixture was slowly added to the mixer and homogenized.
Additive Mo. 4, the liquid organic mixtures was prepared by combining
the appropriate amounts of acetone* bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate9 styrene9
chloroethylene to which the solid pentachlorophenol was lastly added and
dissolved. The organic premixes (No» 4) for low organic SARM were premixed
in assembly-line fashion, measuring and placing the appropriate volume (con-
verted from by density) of each chemical in a number of 1/2 gallon glass
jars (usually 6 to 12). The entire contents ©f one jar was then added to
each 500-pound batch.
The organic premixes for "high-organic" SARM were prepared by measuring
500-pound batches and placing them in a closed end SB-gallon drum, following
-------
thorough mixing by agitation of the drum, the necessary weight of premix No,
4 was pumped out of the drum and placed9 temporarilys in-a 5-gallon pail.
The premixedj preweighed portion of organic chemicals were then poured into
the mixer at the appropriate time.
A total of 28,000 pounds of SARM samples were prepared over the course
of the full-scale blending operation. Twenty-seven thousand pounds were
packaged for BDAT testing and archiving. The remaining 1000 pounds were
packaged and shipped to a RCRA permitted facility for disposal.
Following the blending of contaminants with the soil fractions, each
batch was placed into various packages appropriate for shipment to the test-
ing locations and to the archive storage facility. Twenty-four thousand
pounds of SARM I and II (128000 pounds each) were packaged in 489 55-gallon
epoxy-lined open-head steel drums (500 Ib per drum). One thousand pounds of
SARM were packaged in 20 5-gallon steel pails and 2000 pounds of SARM were
packaged in 400 half-gallon glass jars.
The modified mortar mixer has a pour-spout that facilitated dumping the
SARH directly into the 55-gallon drums. Drums were immediately closed,
saaled8 and labeled. When staged drums were filled, the SARM-filled drums
were moved to the storage/shipping trailer and drums of clean soil were moved
The pour-spout of the mixer was used to fill a few of the 5-gallon
pailsi however, a shovel was subsequently used to fill these, either directly
from the mixer or from a 55-gallon drum.
4-13
-------
The 400 5-pound SARM archive samples were placed in sample containers
either by hand or by using stainless-steel and plastic scoops. The jars were
then cleaned,, closed with Teflon-lined Iids9 labeled,, and sealed. One
hundreds 0.5-gallon jars were filled with each SARM type. These samples were
shipped to EPA's research facility in Edison8 New Jersey^ where archiving and
distribution will be controlled.
Transportations consignee, and amounts of SARM samples to be shipped to
testing locations and archiving are presented in Table 4-7 ,
TABLE 4-7. LOCATIONS, QUANTITIES TO BE SENT, AND TRANSPORTATION OF SARMs
Number
Size
John Zink Co.
Tulsa, OK
Stabilization
Leo Weitzman
Durham. NC
Robert Fox
IT Corp.
312 Directors Road
Knoxville, TN
Chemical treatment
Dr. Thomas 0. Tiarnan
Barb Locke
Ric Traver
EPA-HWERl
Edison. NJ
48
8
55 gal Contract truckli
4
5 gal PEI special delivery
1.5 gal PEI
-------
4.5 COMPLICATIONS AND FINAL MIXING PROCEDURE
During the startup of full-scale mixing procedures,.much of the work was
of a-novel nature and the untested procedures used to accomplish the SARM
preparation were understood, from the outsets to be flexible. Some of the
complications encountered during the early phases of full-scale mixing have
been mentioned earlier. Details of these and other complications are pre-
sented in the remainder of this section along with the changes in procedure
that overcame the problems.
During the initial "dry run," sand was used to test the power of the
mortar mixer's electric motor and belt-drive mechanism. One-thousand pounds
of sand were slowly added to the running mixer, which easily turned the full
charge of sand» The mixer was then turned offs allowed to come to a complete
stop* then switched on again, to determine if it could be started from a dead
stop. This was found to be possible and the initial SARM batch wss planned
for a 1000-pound mix.
One-thousand pounds of dry soil was placed into the mixer9 the dry metal
oxides and anthracene were added and the mixer was turned on* The mixer
turned easily and the chemical addition proceeded with the metal salts in
aqueous solution. The solution was pumped from a 55-gallon drum to a holding
tank mounted on the wall beside the fume hood (Figure 4-1)9 from which it
flowed through a Teflon tubes and into a spray-bar mounted on the inside of
the mixer I1d. A leak became apparents caused by the spray striking the
underside of the mixer cover and running to its edge9 from where it dripped
to the floor behind the mixer. The mixer was turned off to reposition the
spray bar and when the mixer was turned on agains it would not turn the
now-wet soil. The mixer was emptied ©f more than half its load and turned
4-15
-------
on, again with no restart^ Th@ mixer was then completely emptied and prepa-
rations were made to complete the initial 1000-pound mix as two 500-pound
mixes. One 500-pound mix was completed without further difficulty including
the use of the injection spray-bar and holding tank for the addition of the
organics solution.
The second 500-pound mix was begun and the spray bar promptly clogged
with scale believed to be caused either by corrosion by the metals solution
or from galvanic plating of metals from the solution. Upon further inspec-
tion of the feed systems most other components had either been severly cor-
roded9 plated9 or attacked by the high-concentration metals solution or the
aggressive solvent mixture passed through it» The decision was made to add
the solutions manually, rather than risk a major leak or spill resulting from
Deteriorating materials*
During the second 500-pound batch9 the mixer encountered mechanical
problems. These problems were attributed to misalignment of chains gears,
attempt. The gears were realigned and the mix completed. The decision to
limit further mixing to 500-pound batches was reacheds owing to the damage
done to the mixer during the first mix as identified during mechanical repair
of the mixer.
addition of any liquids, in both batches completed thus far. Dry soil and
chemicals were added to the mixer for the third batch and the mixer turned
on. The mixer turned freely for approximately 10 minutes then seized prompt-
ly upon the addition of 2 gallons of the aqueous metal solution. The mixer
-------
was emptied by hand and a drys hard scale of silty dirt was found to be
packed against the rear of the mixer tub. The scale had -obvious rubber burns
from the pads on the mixer blades and the'blades were twisted around the
square center-axle of the mixer, indicating the extreme torque that had been
applied to the blades. This condition was attributed to the fact that the
mixer was designed for mixing wet materials., and the low moisture content of
the low metals SARM was insufficient for the mixer to work properly.
The decision was mads to first place approximately 7 to 10 gallons of
water in the mixer tub9 which was then used to dissolve the metal salts for
each SARM batch. To this solutions the soil from one drum and the premixed
dry chemicals for a 500-pound batch were slowly added9 yielding a wet slurry
that the mixer was capable of turning. To this slurry was added the organic
solutions the mixer lid and fume-hood doors closed, and the 12-minute count
bec.un. Tiris procedure continued through the remainder of full-scale mixing
with the exception of two 1000-pound batches that were completed using the
most recent procedure. It was determined that too much stress was placed on
both the equipment and personnels and no more 1000-pound batches were made.
Although work typically began at 5:00 a.m., ambient temperatures during
the work day averaged above 90 degrees and work often continued until mid to
late afternoon. The physical and mental stress of working long hours in
Levels B and C protective clothing, breathing supplied air or wearing air-
purifying rtspiratorSs and the labor necessary to m©va8 lift, dump and pack
500-pound batches of chemically-hazardous materials kept productivity to a
maximum of 38500 pounds per day. A number of days were spent producing only
500 to 18500 pounds and ©n a few days no SARM samples were produced at all.
-------
4.6 WASTE HANDLING PRACTICES
Contaminated waste materials generated during the full-scale blending
activities ware containerized in DOT 17E «pen-head drums over the course of
the operation. Upon completion of the full-scale field activitiess all
containerized waste materials; e.g., spill cleanup materials^ absorbents,,
protective clothings decontamination materialss spilled chemicals9 etc., were
labeled as hazardous waste9 and arrangements are being made for its proper
4.7 SITE
During the preparation of the SARMs9 there were no spills or accidents
of significance. Minor spills occurring during measuring or addition of
chemicals were either immediately contained in selected containment areas or
devices or were cleaned up using sorbent materialss scoops and shovels.
nated materials generated during the SARM preparation. Prepared SARM spilled
during transfer from mixer to containers was immediately picked up and placed
either back into the mixer or into the SARM containers. Minor amounts of
leftover SARM was placed in waste drums for disposal along with other
cal supply* ite«) will be returned to its original condition. This will
entail rem©vt18 packaging^ manifesting, and disposal of contaminated building
and cleanup materials. The mixer has been decontaminated by removing gross
contamination followed by water and solvent rinses; it was then reattached to
-------
trailer mounting for further use by EPA staff at the Center Hill facility.
Demolition of the building should proceed in a manner such that reusable
portions will be saved; all other materials that are either unusable8
impractical, or impossible to decontaminate will be disposed ©f as solid
waste and/or hazardous waste* as appropriate,
Final inspection of the site will be requested of Center Hill Research
Facility officials to assure that the cleanup and decoranissionlng is to their
Under the BOAT testing program$ samples of the various SARMs are being
analyzed for contaminant concentrations, TCLP9 moisture contents and other
parameters. Most of these results are not yet available; they will be added
to this section at a later date.
An analysis of moisture content of the SARM samples provided for soil
washing BOAT testing yielded the following results:
I 19.6 22.9
I! 6,2 7.2
III 18.6 20.6
The lo»i»1stiire content for the SARM II sample provided to the soil
washing test program is believed to be accurate because this sample was taken
il
batches of SARM II were prepared using a higher water contents similar to
4-19
-------
Data generated as part of the Super-fund BOAT test program on the four
are given in Tables 4-8 through 4-11.
These limited data suggest that the-metal levels achieved were reason-
ably close to the targets. Many of the organic levels were lower than
desired; reasons for the low organic results may include poor recovery effi-
ciencies, analytical detection limitations or error, losses of volatiles
of the SARM. Further conclusions as to the validity and representativeness
of the available organic data are reserved pending the full receipt of data
on the untreated SARMs from the BOAT technologies.
=20
-------
TABLE 4-8. ANALYTICAL PROFILE OF SARH I, MG/KG •
R. Thurnau
desorption) (stabilization) (incineration)
330, 260
400. 360
3600, 3100
3300, 2700, 6000
3600, 4000, 2400
810, 580
350, 260
160. 110
20
13
22
26
17. 17, 20
269 258 27
24S 33, 39
261 , 296 , 292
289 30S 27
4599 551 , 526
20
45
30
68
1028
Task 58 R. Thuraau Project Officer, PEI Contractor,
Contract No. 68-03-3241, Task 2-18, E. Barth Project Officers Acurex Contractor
-Ebaseo (lab) under EPA Contract No. 68-01-7280* R. Thurnau$ P.O.
Data generated under EPA Contract Mo. 68-03-33899 Task 79 R. Thuroaus P.O., PEI Contractor, Radian
Organic data generated under EPA Contract No. 68-03-34139 Task 6S C. Rogers, P.0»8 PEI Contractors
- data given is on wet weight basis.
^o. 4-87-1-0275, T. D.
Enterorises. Inc. Subcontractor - data given is on wet weight basis.
-------
TABLE 4-9. ANALYTICAL PROFILE OF SARM II, MG/KG
320
430
6.6
1.3
82.5
155
180, 250, 260
3*.2| 4!29 4.2
568 150S 15
17, 31, 31
13, 18, 18
680, 570, 270
229 6.99 30
13, 3.58 28
240, 84, 330
51, 16, 67
299 8.59 36
270, 280
30, 37
4.29 120
ro
20
15
30
35
Zinc
32
625
19, 19, 18
26S 26, 26
30, 279 27
282, 250, 255
328$ 301, 302
309 28S 28
548, 508, 158
20
59
33
376
379
70
1725
IT Corporation Subcontractor (lab) - data given is on wet weight basis
Data generated yrsder EPA Contract No. 68-03-3241, Task 2-18, E. Barth Project Officer, Acurex Contractor
and Hittman-Ebaseo (lab) under EPA Contract No. 68-01-7280, R. Thuraau, P.O.
Data generated ynder EPA Contract No. 68-03-3389, Task 7$ R. Thurnau, P.O., PEI Contractor, Radian
Organic data generated under EPA Contract No. 68-05~34139 Task 6, C. Rogers, P.O., PEI Contractor,
Wright State Subcontractor (lab) - data given is on wet weight basis.
Metals data generated under EPA Contract No. 7C3072 YAWE, Subcontract No. 4-87-1-0275, T. D. Ferguson,
P.O.. Analytical Enterprises, Inc. Subcontractor - data given is on wet weight basis.
-------
TABLE 4-10. ANALYTICAL PROFILE OF SARM I!
R. Thurnau E. Barth R. Thurnau C. Rogers
desorption) (stabilization) (incineration) (KPEG)
l92-dich1oroethane
60
320
SS3
Arsenic
Copper
Lead
22.
220
24
13
16
1163
LI,
24,262
Organic data generated under
Mright State Subcontractor
P.O., Analytical Enterprises, Inc.
68-03-3413, Task 6, C. Rogers, P.O., PEI Contractor,
is on wet weight basis.
.... 7C3072 YAWE5 Subcontract No. 4-87-1-0275, T. D. Ferguson,
Subcontractor - data given is on wet weight basis.
-------
TABLE 4-11. ANALYTICAL PROFILE OF SARM IV, MG/KG
E. Barth R. Thurnau C. Rogers1
ion) (KPEG)
INS
Volatiles
6800 139000
400 270
1,2-
, 55
338
Cadmium
109928
17,175
229500 239414
and Hittman-Ebasc© (lab) under EPA Contract No. 68-Oi-72808 R. Thurnau, P.O.
c Organic data generated under EPA Contract No. 68-03-3413s Task 6S C. Rogers, P.O., PEI Contractor,
Wright State Subcontractor (lab) - data given is on wet weight basis.
Metals data generated under EPA Contract No. 7C3072 YAMES Subcontract No. 4-87-1-0275, T. D. Ferguson,
P.O., Analytical Enterprises,, Inc. Subcontractor - data given is on wet weight basis.
-------
SOIL WASHING (BOAT PHYSICAL TREATMENT)
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The primary objective of Task 2 was to conduct bench-scale operations
that simulate the EPA Mobile Soils Hashing System (MSWS) for the evaluation
of the BOAT SARM samples. The MSWS has been designed for onsite removal of a
broad range of hazardous materials and associated fine fractions from excavated
soils. This system is expected to be an economic alternative to the current
practice of hauling contaminated soils offsite to a landfill and replacing
the excavated volume with fresh soil on site* This system is capable of
extracting certain contaminants from soils and thereby enabling operators to
perform an economic volumetric reduction of the waste site material.
Speeificallys this project was designed to simulate the drum screen
washer segment of the MSWS as described by J.S. Shum (1987) in the Operation
and Maintenance Manual. This segment of the MSWS separates the +2-mm soil
fraction from the -2-mm soil fraction (fines) by use of a rotary drum screen.
A high-pressure water knife operates at the head of the system to break up
soil lumps and strip the contaminants off the soil particles. Both the
design of the MSWS and the design of the bench-scale experiments to simulate
the MSWS for cleanup of the SARHS samples operate on the following assumptions,
which underlie the volume reduction approach ©f physical soils washings
5-1
-------
1. A significant fraction of the contaminants (BOAT SARM) are attached
to the silt9- humus8 and clay particles.
2c The silt and clay are attached to the sand and gravel by physical
processes (primarily compaction/adhesion).
3, Physical washing of the sand/gravel/rock fraction will effectively
remove the fine sands silt, and clay sized (less than 0,25 mm)
materials from the coarse material.
4. The contaminants will be removed to the same extent that the silt
and clay are separated (i.e.9 increasing the efficiency of the
washing process will directly increase the removal efficiency for
the majority of the BOAT contaminant mix).
To meet these objectives, different wash solutions were evaluated in
bench-scale shaker table experiments. Water with minor additives (i.e.,
acids, basess ehelantss and surfactants for fines migration) was the only
solvent investigated. Organic solvents and oxidizing agents were considered
but found not to be viable soil washing solutions because of material handling
problems associated with these compoundss especially when used in a field
situation. Following the shaker-table washs the soil was wet sieved to
separates the soil into +2-mm and -2-mm size fractions, three size fractions
(+2-mm9 250-pm - 2-mmg and ~2SQ-ym) were investigated in this study to
determine if the middle fraction (medium to fine sand) could be cleaned
'effectively, thereby increasing the volume reduction achievable. To
determine the effectiveness of the soil washing techniques for reducing the
volume of contaminated material, the resulting soil fractions were subsequently
analyzed for total ©rganics and metals per standard 6C/MS and I CAP techniques
i, 3rd ed.) and for leachable constituents per the toxicity character-
The soil washing was conducted at EPA's Oil and Hazardous Materials
Simulated Environmental Test Tank (OHMSETT) facility in Leonardo* New Jersey,
5-2
-------
The facility is equipped with a 40-foot mobile laboratory trailer, which was
specially designed to handle highly toxic materials. The semi-trailer has a
ventilation system providing 15 air changes per hour in a single pass-through
configuration. Furthermore, the trailer is completely self-contained, which
aided in the prevention of cross contamination by other nonrelated operations
involving hazardous materials.
5.2 PROJECT SCOPE
5.2.1 Literature Review
An abbreviated literature search was conducted to identify candidate
wash .solutions for the BOAT SARM samples. The emphasis of the search was on
work recently completed in the area of soil washing with special emphasis on
the development and subsequent pilot-scale demonstrations of the EPA MSW
system. The search included a review of previously prepared EPA research
reports (in-house and publicly disseminated), recent articles on treatment of
contaminated soils,, and other readily obtainable documents.
Soil washing bench-scale shaker table experiments were reviewed to iden-
tify the most significant experimental variables (wash solution^ pHs tempera-
ture, etc.) with respect to this study. Much of the data reported in the
literature were generated in direct support of in situ soil washing. Although
some of the variables In these studies relate specifically to in situ treat-
ment (such as contaminant transport through a soil column), many of the
variables pertain more generally to mobilization of contaminants and9 therefore,,
are applicable to this study.' Tables 5-1 and 5-2 summarize the literature
review of these experiments. Table 5-1 lists studies in which organic
contaminant removal was of primary interest, and Table 5-2 lists those studies
in which inorganic (mostly metals)
5-3
-------
TABLE 5-1. SUMMARY OF SHAKER-TABLE SOILS WASHING EXPERIMENTS FOR SOILS WITH ORGANIC CONTAMINATION
I.
2.
3.
4.
Variable
Temperature
pH
Reaction time
Surfactant type and
concentration
Ellis, Payne,
and McNabb 1985
®Eb
NE
1 tar
1.5 to 3.01 total
Adsee 799 and
Hyontc NP-90ffl
Mason Hanger
Normal (65°F) and
elevated (120°F)
Normal (7-8) and
elevated (11.5)
»e
0.151 Tidef
Study
Alperin 1983
HE
NE
4 hours
1 to 6% total Adsee 799
and Hyonic NP-90
Scholtz and
Milanowski 1983
ME
ME
3 hours
0.1 to 10X Tweem
809 U MYRJ 52g
Exner et al. 1985
NE
NE
4 hours
Solvents used Instead
of surfactants:
Tolyene with 20%
and Johnson 1982
Room temperature
and 50°C
HI
1 to 4 minutes
0.15 to 4. OS Tide,
ethyl ene glycol,
fuel oil B and
S. Solution-to-soil ratio
6. Humber of rinses
2:1
Four following
initial wash
3:1
Three sequential
surfactant washes
followed by one water
Hnse
20:1 and 40:1
Kone
isopropyl alcohol
Cyclohexane with 20S
isopropyl alcohol
Three sequential
solvent extractions
other extract-
ants
1:1 and 2:1
Study conducted for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency^ Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory, Releases Control Branch by Hason
Hanger - Silas Hason Co., Inc.; personal communication from J. fJash, Mason & Hager, on May 13, 1987.
£ Manufactured by Witeo Chemical.
Kanisfactured by Dlaosnd Shamrock.
e Cannot be determined from available information.
Manufactured by Procter and Gamble.
y IC1, Inc.
-------
TABLE 5-2. SUMMARY OF SHAKER-TABLE SOILS WASHING EXPERIMENTS FOR SOILS WITH HETAL CONTAMINATION
Study8
Ray ford, Evangelists,
Variable Castle 1985 and Ungers 1986
1. Temperature HE HE
2. pH HDC 7
3. Reaction time 2 hours 5 to 45 minutes
4. CJjelDHt concentra- 108 EDTA 15 - 20% EDTA
tion
m 5. Solution-to-soil 7:3 and 3:2 11:9 and 3:1
i, ™tio
S. Number of rinses 3 to 4 4
PEI 1986a PEI 1986b Ellis 1985
WE tt£ NE
12.5 to 13.0 10.8 and 12.2 6
10 minutes to 8 tayrs, 30 minutes and Overnight
55 Minutes 60 minutes
0.43:1 to 6.13:ld 0.7, 1.4, and 0.1 Molar EDTA
2.41 EDTA («• hydroxylamine
hydrochloride
and citrate
buffer)
2:1 2:1 10:1
None 2 2
Connick 1985 Fox 1984
HE HE
9 to 10 8.5 and 6.0
15 minutes to 30 minutes
48 hours
0.244 Molar EDTA 0.861 and
0.337
Molar EDTA
10:1 2:1 and
8.8:1
KB ' 3
Wiere bench-scale and full-scale data were available, bench-scale data were used in preparation of this table.
b Hot evaluated.
e Cannot be determined from available information.
as molar ratio of EDTA:meta1.
-------
Based on the literature review summarized in Table 5-1 and 5-2, it was
determined that a number of variables are important in maximizing the ef-
fectiveness of the soil washing procedure'. Due to budgetary and time con-
straints, however^ it was decided to minimize evaluation of variables that
had either not been tested or were not critical to the overall soil washing
process, as determined through previous research. Furthermore, variables
that were considered impractical to implement in a field demonstration (i.e.,
very high temperatures, extremely low or extremely high pH values, etc.) also
were not evaluated.
5.2.2 Seject1on_of Variables
This section presents a brief discussion of the experimental variables
chosen for evaluation of physical soil washing of the SARM samples. The
discussion is divided into two parts8 critical parameters for reduction of
organic contamination in soi1s9 and critical parameters for reduction of
metal contamination. Although all of the SARM samples contain both organic
and metal contaminations the variables in this study were optimized for
either organic or inorganic contaminant removal or boths depending on which
!e was being tested. (Refer to Section 5.5 for more detail on the
Teropgrature - Elevated temperatures may reduce the required
reaction times; however, they may also volatilize a significant
portion of the organics. VOC emissions can be treated in the field
eTevatil temperaturi~(120°F).
-------
2. £!1 - ^°r some organicss pH is a useful variable for improving the
mobility of the contaminant into solution {Dietz et al. 1986).
Three pH's that are attainable in the field were evaluated.
Experimental Variable - pH 5» ambient pH of tap water, and pH 12.
3. React[on_Jime - Reaction time9 which affects treatment performances
will be determined during a preliminary run. Reaction times beyond
30 minutes are not considered economical to scale up and were not
be evaluated.
Experimental Variable - 58 15, and 30 minutes.
4. Surfactant Concentration - Industrial Formula Tide (manufactured by
Prorte7^and°6arnb]iT^as"chosen as the test surfactant because it is
biodegradable, inexpensive, easily obtainable, and has proven suc-
cessful in previous soil washing experiments (Nash 1982). The
literature search indicated an optimum range of surfactant concen-
trations between 1 and 10 percent^ however* concentrations over 1.5
percent are likely to result in material handling problems and were
Experimental Variable - 0.1, 0,5S and 1.5 percent (by weight) of
TTde". ——
5. Solution:Soil Ratio - The solution-to-soil ratio should be kept to
a minimum to facfTTtate dewatering and to minimize production of
wastewater. However, based on the available literatures
solution-to-soil ratios below 10:1 may not allow adequate
soil-solution contact.
Experimental Variable - Fixed at 10:1.
6. Number of Rinses - Following contact with the wash solutions the
soil should be"rinsed with either clean solution or plain water to
enhance removal of solubilized contaminants; excessive rinsing,
however, will generate additional wastewater. According to the
literature, a minimum of two rinses appears to be required. Tap
water wash was chosen as the rinse solution to more closely
Fixed at 2 (1 liter each).
Critical Parameters for Reduction of Metal Contamination--
^•° Temgeratyre - Temperature has a negligible effect on chelation of
most mifaTs (Dietz et al. 1986). However8 some data suggest that
an elevated temperature may be necessary for rapid chelation of
chrome III (Dow 1985), Therefore, both elevated and ambient
Hevated temperature (120°F).
5-7
-------
2, fiH - pH is one of the most critical parameters. Both metal cations
and chelating agents are influenced by hydrogen ions; therefore,
any change in pH affects the equilibrium of the. system (Dietz et
al. 1986), Based on research performed by Dow Chemical (supplier
of the chelating agent), the metals under study should be most
effectively chelated at a pH of 8 to 12,
Experimental Variable - pH 8 and pH 12.
3. Reaction Time - Reaction times which affects treatment performance,
will be determined during a preliminary run. Reaction times beyond
30 minutes are not considered economical to scale up and were not
Experimental Variable - §„ 15, and 30 minutes.
Chejant Concentration - Versene 100 (tetrasodiura salt of EDTA
manufactured by Dow Chemical) was chosen as the test chelating
agent because it chelates a variety of metals over a broad pH
range,, is completely roiscible with water, will not chelate univalent
metal ions, and is readily available. Based on calculations
provided by Dow Chemicals a molar concentration of 1:1 to 3:1
Versene 100 to total metal ions present in the SARM samples should
chelate all of the metals present (with the possible exception of
arsenic).
Experimental Variable -1:1 and 3:1 Molar ratio of Versene
htotal metal ions~present in
5. Solutionjjioll Ratio - The solution-to-soil ratio should be kept to
a minimui~to facilitate dewatering and to minimize production of
wastewater. However, based on the available literature,
solution-to-soil ratios below 10:1 may not allow adequate
soil-solution contact.
Experimental Variable - Fixed at 10:1.
6. Number of Rj_njsesi - Following contact with the wash solution, the
soil should be rinsed with either clean solution or plain water to
enhance removal of solubilized contaminants; excessive rinsing^
11teratures a minimum of two rinses appears to be required. Tap
water wash was chosen as the rinse solution to more closely
simulate actual field operation.
Experimental Variable - Fixed at 2 (1 liter each).
5-8
-------
5.3 CONCLUSIONS
The results of the bench scale physical soil washing experiments conducted
on the SARMS lead to a number of conclusions concerning the contaminant
reduction efficiencies attainable on the SARM or similar soil and the feasi-
bility of using a volume reduction approach to soil washing of Superfund
soils.
5.3.1 Contaminant Reduction Efficiencies
The volatile organic contaminants exhibited the highest removal
efficiencies of any of the contaminants. The tap water and 0.5 percent
surfactant washes proved essentially equal in their ability to remove the
total volatile organics contaminants from the top two soil fractions (H-2-mm
and 2-mn to 250-um) at an average of 99.4 and 99.0 TCLP percent reduction,
respectively. Temperature and pH adjustments did not improve volatile
contaminant reduction efficiencies. It is believed that some of the high
reductions in volatile organic concentrations can be attributed to loss
during handling (i.e., samplings agitation with wash solution on shaker-table,
and wet sieve followed by Ro-Tap). Volatile organics lost to the air were
not collected* a total mass balance was beyond the scope of this project.
.Therefore, the amount of volatiles lost to the air was not quantified.
the semivolatiles. None of the wash solutions obtained consistently better
results than any of the other solutions in removing semivolatiles. The best
results obtained were an average of 95.6 percent reduction for the TCLP
semivolatiles in the top two size dassess after a 0.5 percent surfactant
5-9
-3
-------
washs and 94,2 percent reduction after a tap water wash* The third best
result (93.2 percent reduction of TCLP semivolatiles in the top 2 soil
fractions) was obtained after at 3:1 molar EDTA to total'metals wash, There-
fores the primary mechanism of semivolatile organic removal appears to be an
effective physical washing of the soil resulting in separation of the clean
coarse material from the fines$ where the semivolatiles are concentrated.
Consistently higher metal contaminant reduction efficiencies were
obtained for the chelant wash (3:1 molar concentration of EDTA to total metal
ions present in the SARM) than for any of the other washes. Temperature and
pH variations had a negligible effect on the overall metal concentration
reductions. The best results obtained were an average of 93.4 percent reduc-
i
tion for the TCLP metals in the top two size classes (+2-mm and 2-mm to
250-ym) after the chelant wash of SARM II (low organics low metal contamina-
tion) s and 91.1 percent reduction of the same soil fractions after the chelant
wash of SARM III (low organic9 high metal contamination). Generally, arsenic
and chromium showed the poorest removal efficiencies^ while cadmium9 zinc9
copper and nickel all appeared to be easily chelated by the EDTA and exhibited
overall the highest removal efficiencies under chelant wash conditions.
SARM I (high organic, low metal contamination) and SARM IV (high organic.,
high metal contamination) exhibited overall the highest removal efficiencies
for all the contaminants subjected to the TCLP analysis. This is partially
attributable to some results from SARMS II (low organic^ low metal contamina-
tion) and III (low organics- high metal contamination) which appear to be
outliers and cause the contaminant reduction efficiencies for the volatile
-------
and semivolatile organics ©f these SARMS to be unusually low or even negative.
v-x Furthermore, these low organic contaminated soils (SARM II and III) show less
conclusive results because the concentrations are often at or near the
detection limits. When numbers are this 1ows a slight change in concentration
can exaggerate the resulting effect on removal efficiencies.
As expected, the +2-mm soil fraction frequently exhibited lower contami-
nant concentrations than the 2-mm to 250-pm soil fraction. The overall
average of all TCLP contaminant reduction efficiencies (throwing out those
outliers discussed above) was 91 percent for the 4-2-mm soil fraction and 78
percent for 2-m to 250-pm soil fraction. In general, there are no apparent
differences between the water wash9 the 3:1 molar ehelant washs and the 0.5
percent surfactant wash for cleaning of the +2-mm soil fraction. As
hypothesized,, the silt and clay particles appear to be attached to the sand
{ "" and gravel primarily by physical processes9 such as compaction and adhesion.
These physical attractions are often related to the age of the soil anc
contact time between the contaminants and soil particles. Because the
is a synthetic waste, the forces of attraction are relatively weak, a
condition more typical of a spill site soil than an o1der8 abandoned CERCLA
site soil. Consequentlys the water wash was as effective in cleaning the
•t-2-nm soil fraction as the other water plus additive solutions.
5.3.2 Contiiftinated Soil-Volume Reduction
were approximately 13 percent by weight +2-mm soil sizes 29 percent were 2-n
reduction efficiencies provided in the previous sections 13 percent of the
5-11
-------
realized an average TCLP contaminant reduction of 91 percent and 29
percent realized an average TCLP reduction of 78 percent,. Together the top
two soil size classes make up approximately 42 percent of the soil by weight,
and the overall TCLP contaminant reduction obtained in these experiments for
these top two size classes was 82 percent.
Furthermore, many of the washes resulted in either the +2-mm or the 2-mm
to 250-ym (or both in some cases) soil size fractions to be under the
proposed TCLP regulatory limits. These soils could then potentially be
classified as non-hazardous. Specifica11ys SARM I (high organic^ low metal
contamination) realized a 42 percent weight reduction in "hazardous waste"
classified soil after the tap water wash (both top soil fractions were below
the TCLP limits), and a 13 percent weight reduction (+2-mm soil fraction)
after the surfactant wash. SARM II (low orgam'es low metal contamination)
was belcw all TCLP limits prior to washing. However s, SARMS III (low organic,
high metal contamination) and IV (high organic,, high metal contamination)
both contained cadmium (with lead and tetrachloroethylene in some cases)
slightly over the 1.0 mg/1 TCLP limit in all the soil sizes after washing,
During the prewash analysis of the SARMS8 it was discovered that washing
the soil may not be necessary to reduce the volume of contaminated soil. All
four SARMS were wet-sieved and analyzed to determine where the contaminants
were located (which size fraction) prior to washing. Separation of the SARM
by wet sieving into the three particle sizes proved effective in
concentrating thi contaminants in the fines (less than 250 ym) and subsequently
removing a significant portion of the contamination from the +2-mm and 2-mm
5-12
-------
to 250-ym particle size fractions. The result of this prewash (or wet sieve
only) experimental run was to show that for soils which have hot aged (such
as the SARMS or spill site soils)s particle size separation only, eliminating
or minimizing the use of wash solutions,^appears to be an efficient means of
achieving a significant volume reduction of the contaminated soil.
After nearly all the washes8 the contaminants were concentrated in the
fines (<250-pm soil fraction). These fines contain hurnus8 silt, clay, and
very fine sand. The separation of the fines from the coarse material and
subsequently, the concentration of the contaminants in the fine soil fraction
is one ©f the main processes critical to the volume reduction approach to
soil washing. However, these fines will have to undergo further treatment
prior to disposal. As indicated in Section 5.48 soil washing is well suited
to be part of a treatment train. For example, the contaminated fines from
soil washing could be stabilized, incinerated8 or sent to a chemical treatment
facility9 while the coarse clean material could be returned to the site, thus
iring further processing.
The mix of contaminants in Superfund soils lends itself to an extraction
or washing treatment technology such as that demonstrated in this study.
Although promising results have already been achieved at the pilot scale at a
number of lead-contaminated Superfund sites, additional research is needed to
demonstrate ths cost-effectiveness of soil washing for full-scale treatment
of a wide range of metal*- and organic-contaminated soils. Specifically, most
5-13
-------
unit operations for pretreatment and extraction of the contaminants from the
soil as well as post-treatment of the extractant. Howevers the effective
separation of the wash solution from the soils recycle of the regenerated
wash so!ution8 and concentration/destruction of the contaminants have not
been demonstrated at a large-scale pilot facility (Dietz et al. 1986). The
following list delineates areas in which laboratory research data are 1acking9
particularly with respect to development of soil washing as a full-scale
viable treatment option for Superfund soils. Specific projects are
recommended within these research areas.
1. Laboratory Feasibility Study for Evaluating Removal of SARM Contam-
inant s'TronTllash Mater - Treatment of the wash water remaining
after contact with and separation from the contaminated soil was
not part of the physical soil-washing experiments described in this
report. However, if soil washing is to be an economical approach
to cleaning contaminated soils, the wash water must be economically
treated to reduce its contamination level and to recover/recycle
the chelant or surfactant, if used. The objective of this wash
water treatment stud;.' would De to establish the optimum process for
recirculation of the wash solution,, including the concentration and
removal of any solubilized contaminants; the separation and dewater-
ing of suspended clay9 humuss and colloidal material; and the
addition of new stripping agents.
2. Physical Soil Washing Laboratory-Scale Study Utilizing Actual
lugerfiIrid~~SoiIs Containing a Hix of Hetal and Organj_c~Cgntarnination
- The principal reason for the high removal efficiencies observed
in this study was that the SARMS had not aged. Dietz et al. (1986)
indicate that metal-soil binding changes with time until an equi-
librium is established; therefore preadsorbed soils (such as the
SARMS) may not be representative of "mature" Superfund soils.
Typicallys both organic and metal contaminants are converted over
oxide matrices of the soil (Ellis and Fogg 1985). Therefore,, a
"mature81 aged Superfund soil may be more difficult t© clean via
physical soil washing,, and volume reduction of a Superfund soil may
je as easily achieved as it was for the S/
-------
Evaluation of Sequential^ash Solutions for Reducing Combined
HFganlc alid^MetaT'ContajTmiatjon - This study examined the effective-
ness of surfactant and chelant wash solutions in reducing the level
of organic and metal contaminations respectively,, of a mixed waste.
The evaluation of sequential washes for reducing the total level of
contamination, however, was beyond the scope of this project. Most
of the currently available published data on soil washing are
applicable to either metal- or organic-contaminated soils. However,
many Superfund soils contain both metals and organics together in
high enough concentrations to warrant evaluation of physical soil
washing. Both metal and organic contaminants are held in the soil
fines, as shown in this study; therefores the volume reduction
approach to soil washing should be effective as a treatment
technology for a combined contaminant soil matrix,
Additional Pilot-Scale Studies Utilizing the EPA Mobile Soil-Washing
System (MSWS) - The HSWS has'been Demonstrated at~5nYy™a few lead-
contaminated waste sites. The objective of this study would be to
obtain engineering information on the unit cost, personnel require-
ments s and performance of the HSWS for treatment of the SARMS or an
5. Bench-Scale Feasibility Study for Evaluating Stabilization/Solidi-
TTcation (S/FrTff^H7venesj_aj.^T^atmenTTraTri Option for th°e~°"
roncenTrajid__Finjsii"^ The most efficient full-scale use of physical
washing wiir~pro¥ably be as part of a treatment train, since this
technology has proven effective in removing contamination from the
+2-mm soils fraction but has met with limited success in cleaning
the -2-mm soils. The objective of this study would be to evaluate
soil washing for volume reduction followed by S/S of the fines
(-2-mm fraction) where the contaminants are concentrated. An
evaluation of dewatering methods prior to S/S would also have to be
Evaluation of FeedStock_Pireparation Methods for the EPA MSWS -
The objective 6TTfns~¥tudywou1d be to evaluate~31fferer>T
pretreatment options that will optimize the operating conditions
and ultimate treatment efficiencies of the MSWS. Grinding,
crushing^ and other physical unit operations would be evaluated in
addition to chemical pretreatment options (air stripping for
organicSj etc.) on a bench scale as part of an overall soil washing
5.5 EXPERIMENTAL TEST DESI6M
The physical washing of the SARMS was conducted in two phases. Phase I
involved the evaluation of wash solutions at different concentrations under
varying conditions of pH and temperature. SARM I (high organic/low metal
contamination) and SARM III (low organic/high metal contamination) were
-------
evaluated in Phase I to determine the optimum conditions under which organic
and metal contamination, respectivelys would be effectively reduced.
All four SARMS were subsequently washed during Phase II under optimum
conditions for both the organic and metal contaminant reduction. Prior to
initiating Phase I, the reaction times for the chelant and surfactant washes
were determined as described in Section 5.6.2. These experiments targeted
metal and organic contaminants, respectivelys without regard for nontarget
contaminants. The evaluation of a universal wash solution and the use of
sequential washes for targeting both organic and metal contaminants were
beyond the scope of this study. Table 5-3 presents the Phase I experimental
test design. The results from Phase I screening tests were then used to
design Phase II. Phase II further evaluated those variables and associated
process conditions that were determined to be optimum in Phase I.
The Phase II experimental test design is shown in TaMe 5-4. This test
design is based upon the results obtained in Phase I (see Section 5.7), which
indicated that ambient pH and temperature combined with a molar ratio of 3:1
EDTA to total metal concentration was most effective in removing metals from
SARM III, The results also indicated that ambient pH and temperature combined,
with a surfactant concentration of 0.5 percent proved slightly more effective
than any of the other conditions in removing organic contaminants from SARM
time (15 minutes for water and chelant washes9 30 minutes for surfactant
washes) solution-to-soil ratio (10:1 by weight) and the number of rinses
following soil sieving (2 1-liter rinses with tap water).
-------
TABLE 5-3. PHASE I EXPERIMENTAL TEST DESIGN
I
(high organic/low metal contamination)
Reaction time - 30 minutes
Solution-to-soil ratio - 10:1
Run
1
2
3
4
5
3
6
2
7
Surfactant
Temperg concen-
atures tration
pHa °F (weight *) Objective
6.7
9.2
9.6
10.7
Low - 5.0
9.6
High - 12.0
9.2
9.2 Hi
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
gh - 120
Water
1.5
0.5
0.1
0,5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.1
Establish baseline
Study effect of surfactant concentration
Study effect of surfactant concentration
Study effect of surfactant concentration
Study effect of pH
. Study effect of pH
Study effect of pH
Study effect of temperature
Study effect of temperature
2
5
12.0
12.0
SARM III
(low organic/high metal contamination)
Reaction time - 15 minutes
lution-to-soil ratio - 10:1
Run
1
2
3
2
4
Temperg
ature8
PHa °F
6.7 78
12.0 78
12.0 78
12.0 78
Low - 8.0 78
Chelant
ratio (moles
of EDTA to
total moles
of metal )
Water
1:1
3:1
1:1
1:1
Objective
Establish baseline
Study effect of chelant molar
Study effect of ehelant molar
Study effect ©f pH
Study effect of pH
ratio
ratio
1:1
All pH values given are ambient values of the wash so1utionss unless noted
otherwise. Those values listed as low and high were adjusted to the given
to the given temperature.
values of the wash so1utions9
as low and high were adjusted
5-17
-------
TABLE '5-4. PHASE II EXPERIMENTAL TEST DESIGN
Run
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
I
2
3
SARM pHa
I 6.7
9.6
II 6.7
12.0
9.6
III 6.7
12.0
IV 6.7
12.0
9.6
Temperatures
op
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
Wash solution
Mater
0.5% surfactant
Water
3:1 molar ratio
0.5% surfactant
Water
3:1 molar ratio
Water
3:1 molar ratio
0.5% surfactant
ehelant
ehelant
ehelant
a All pH values given are ambient values of the wash solutions,
All temperature values given are ambient values of the wash
The optimum conditions for reducing organic and metal contamination were
applied to all four SARMs and compared with a baseline plain water wash for
each SARH. The results of Phase I are discussed in more detail in Section
5.7= Phase II results are presented in Section 5.8,
5.6
5.6.1 Size Classification of Soil for Prewash Analysis
To determine where the contaminants were distributed in the soils before
treatments each of the four SARMs was classified by wet sieving into three
size fractions—greater than 2-mm (+10 mesh)8 less than 2-mm but greater than
250-ym (10 to 60 mesh)s and less than 250-pm (-60 mesh), A representative
sample of soil was placed on the top sieve and alternately sprayed with water
and screened by shaking the nested sieves in a sieve shaker (Ro-Tap) to
5-18
-------
effect the separation. A minimum amount of water was used in the wet sieving
process to minimize any soluble contaminant transport between size fractions.
(Dry sieving was attempted; however,, the SARM samples were generally too wet
to be effectively dry sieved.) The three size fractions were submitted for
total analysis,
5.6.2 Determination of Reaction Time
reaction times for all Phase I and Phase II runs were determined
experimentally by washing representative samples of SARM I and SARM III with
dilute solutions of Tide (0.1 percent by weight) and Versene 100 (1:1 molar
ratio of EDTA to total metals), respectively8 at ambient temperature and pH
per the method described in Section 5.6,3. Sample aliquots were extracted
after 59 158 and 30 minutes and allowed to settle. After settlings the
supernatant from each sample was vacuum filtered (for the ehelant wash
solution) or centrifuged (for the surfactant wash solution) to separate the
solidSs and the remaining liquid was submitted for chemical analysis.
Concentrations of the target analytes present in the liquid were plotted
versus time for determination of the time at which the reactions were
essentially complete. (See Section 5,7 for a discussion of these results.)
The optimum reaction times„ as determined from these tests, were adopted for
all Phase I and II experimental runs,
5.6.3 Soil Washing
The Phase I and Phase II soil washing experiments involved contacting
the soil with the wash solution by agitating the mixture on a laboratory
tests, and wet sieving the treated soil into three size fractions: coarse
(+10 mesh or +2-mm), medium-grained (10 to 60 mesh or 2-m to 250-pm)s and
5-19
-------
fine (-60 mesh or less than 250-pm). A representative sample of soil was
mixed with the chelant or surfactant solution of the desired concentration at
a 10:1 solution-to-soil ratio. The temperature of the wash solution was
controlled at the tap by using cold or hot water. The pH of the wash solu-
tion was adjusted as necessary by titrating it with 10 N sulfuric acid
(H«SO^) or 10 N sodium hydroxide (NaOH). After agitatings the mixture was
poured onto the top sieve and alternately rinsed with water (two 1-liter
rinses) and screened by shaking the rested sieves in a Ro-Tap to effect the
separation. In the Phase I experiments,, only the coarse and medium-grained
fractions were submitted for chemical analysis. In the Phase II experiments,
all three size fractions were submitted for both total analysis and TCLP
5,7 PHASE I RESULTS
Figures 5-1 and 5-2 present the reaction time results for a 1:1 molar
chelant wash of SARM III and for a 0.1 percent weight surfactant wash of SARM
I, respectively. As can be seen from Figure 5-1, no significant additional
metal chelation occurs after 15 minutes for any of the six metals. There-
fore, a 15-minute reaction time was chosen for the chelant washes. As shown
in Figure 5-29 no similar completion of reaction was evident for the organic
contaminants (as total organic halogens) whose concentration in the wash
water continued to increase over the entire 30-minute interval. Therefore,
30 minutes was chosen as the reaction time for the surfactant washes on the
Tables 5-5 and 5-6 summarize the results of Phase I soil washing for
III (high metal/low organic concentration), and Table 5-7 summarizes the
results for SARM I (low metal, high organic concentration). Contaminant
5-20
<>d feW
-------
o
O g
en
i
to1
©3
c
2.
CO
c
3
O'
3 3-
5 o- g o 3- gg
o ^ n 32 o 9- ®
R-
i» 3 i. 2.
™ g- c o
-------
reduction efficiencies were not calculated because the results are on a
wet-weight, as-received basis. The Phase I chemical analyses were designed
to be a comparison tool for use in selecting the best conditions for further
evaluation in Phase II.
Phase I results for the SARM III +2-mm soil fraction9 as shown in Table
§-5s do not differ by enough margin to conclude that any of the experimental
runs was superior in removing the contaminants. The contaminants appear to
be adhered to the coarse particles primarily through a physical mechanism;
therefore^ the tap water wash (Run 1) was as effective as the other washes in
separating the contaminated finer particles from the coarse (+2-mm) particles.
The data contained in Table 5-6s howevera are slightly more conclusive. The
medium-grained material (250-ym to 2-mm soil fraction) is more difficult to
physically clean because of its smaller size and greater specific surface
area for adsorption of contaminants. The removal of metals from this soil
size fraction seems to be a combination of physical and chemical processes,
since water alone (Run 1) does not appear to be as effective as water plus
EDTA, Experimental Run 38 which is ambient pH and temperature and a 3:1
molar ratio of EDTA to total metals» resulted in the lowest concentration of
all metals except arsenic. Run 3 was chosen as the optimum set of variables
for reduction of metal contamination and was further evaluated in the Phase
II soil washing experiments.
Table 5-7 shows the Phase I results for SARM I. These data are not ss
extensive as the Phase I results for SARM III because of problems encountered
in identifying an appropriate screening analysis for organic contaminants.
Total organic carbon (TOC) and total organic halogens (TOX) were both tried
-------
TABLE 5-5. PHASE I RESULTS: SARM III. >2-mm SIZE FRACTION
Concentration, mg/kg (wet weight)
Runa
Untreated soil
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Run 5
Arsenic
604
54
40
40
38
36
Cadmium
756
165
150
130
155
155
Chromium
868
2.2
1.8
2.7
1.6
3.1
Copper
8830
52
47
44
42
48
Lead Nickel
12,776 674
76 14
66 14
63 14
78 12
58 14
Zinc
23,840
325
335
315
330
350
Refer to Table 5-3 for explanation of runs,
b
TABLE 5-6. PHASE I RESULTS: SARM III, 250-ym to 2-mm SIZE FRACTION
Concentration, mg/kg (wet weight)
Runa
Untreated soil
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Run 5
Arsenic Cadmium
604 756
6Ii 145
71 110
52 80
74 140
40 130
Chromium Copper Lead
868 8830 12,776
9.8 165 275
11.5 165 265
6.0 90 145
9.3 160 220
9.0 175 320
Nickel
674
26
30
21
29
34
Zinc
239840
1S060
1S600
500
18250
1,550
Refer to Table 5-3 for explanation of runs.
Unscreened sample.
TABLE 5-7. PHASE I RESULTS: SARM I, 250-pm to 2-mm SIZE
Acetone Styrene o-Xylene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene
Untreated soil6800100082004003200
1 >570 3 4 19 9
2 <50 3 5 19 9
3 <50 3 5 19 14
4 <50 4 7 28 14
Run 5 <50 3 5 19 9
Run 6 <50 3 5 22 10
7 <50 4 7 28 14
Refer to Table 5-3 for explanation ©f runs.
5-23
-------
were not reproducible. A carbon tetrachloride extraction followed by IR
analysis was also attempted; however^ all analytical results were below the
detection limit of 80 ppm total hydrocarbons. The nondetectable levels were
attributed to incomplete extraction of the organics by the carbon tetrachloride,
Finallys GC analysis for five of the organic contaminants was settled on.
Because of budgetary and time constraints, only the medium grained fraction
(2-ym to 250-mm)9 which had shown better differentiation between variables
for SARH IIIS was submitted for analysis. Generally9 Table 5-7 shows that
significant reductions were achieved for most organic constituents. Comparison
among runs is inconclusive. None of the variables appear to have a more
significant effect on organic contaminant reduction than any of the others.
for basing conclusions,, Run 3 (0.5 percent surfactant by weight^ ambient pH
and temperature) was chosen for furthir evaluation in Phase II. Run 3 showed
slightly better results than Run 4 (0.1 percent surfactant by weight* ambient
pH and temperature), and Run 2 (1.5 percent surfactant by weights ambient pH
and temperature) did not result in significant additional contaminant reduction
over Run 3 to justify the higher surfactant concentration.
5.8 PHASE II RESULTS
5.8.1 TCLP Results
TCLP analyses were performed on the raw soil and on each of the three
soil size fractions after soil washing according to the method described in
the Federal Register, Volume 51, to. 216, November 7S 1986. The TCLP was
developed as a means of determining if mismanagement of a waste has the
potential to pose a significant hazard to human health or the environment
because of its propensity to leach toxic compounds. Thi TCLP analysis is
-------
intended to model codisposal of industrial waste with refuse in a sanitary
landfill, which represents a worst-case mismanagement scenario.
Tables 5-8 through 5-11 present the results of the TCLP analyses for
each of the four SARMS. These tables also contain the TCLP regulatory level
for all compounds as proposed in the Federal Register, Volume 51, No\ 114,
June 13, 1986. The discussion of results relates the TCLP Regulatory Levels
to those levels achieved through the bench-scale soil washing experiments
described in this report.
The TCLP results from soil washing of SARM I (high organic9 low metal
contamination) are shown in Table 5-8= The untreated SARM I sample falls
below the regulatory levels for all metals and above the regulatory levels
$
for all volatile and semivolatile organies. For both Run I (water wash) and
Run 3 (surfactant wash), the +2-mm soil fractions were below all of the
proposed TCLP limits. Furthermore, for Run 1, the 2-mm to 250-pm fraction
and the -250-ym fraction were also below all of the proposed TCLP limits. As
described previously, the SARM was determined to be composed of approximately
13 percent by weight coarse material (+2 mm)9 29 percent by weight medium-
grained material (2 mm to 250 pm)s and 58 percent by weight fines (-250 ym).
Therefore, the water wash resulted in a 100 percent reduction (by weight) of
1
In Run 3S
constituent in the 2-nm to 250-ym size
TCLP levels. Although the SARM was theoretically homogeneous, the sample
drawn for Run 3 may not have been
the idea of a n
5-25
-------
TABLE 5-8. PHASE II TCLP RESULTS: SARM I (HIGH ORGANICS, LOW METALS)
I\J
TCLP
regylatory .
Contaminant level (ng/1)'
Volatile organics
Ac® tone
Chlorobenzene 1.4
1,2-Diehloroethane 0.40
Ethyl benzene
Sty tens
Tetrachloroethylene 0.1
Xylene
Semfvolatile orgaraics
Anthracene
Bis{2-ethy]hexyl )
ph thai ate
Pentachlorophenol 3.6
Inorganics
Arsenic 5.0
Cadmium 3.0
Chromium 5.0
Copper
Lead 5.0
Zinc
Untreated
' SARM I
110
5.2
76
27
9.0
3.3
62
0.07
0.10
7.6d
0.15
0.53
0.01
0.61
0.49
0.27
9.2
>2 mm
1.30*;
0.04^
0.05*!
0.40^
0.12^
0.02C
1.20C
0.01
0.04
0.06
0.15
0.15
0.01
0.04
0.15
0.04
0.88
Run 1,
water wash
250 ym-2 (Ml
0.74C
o'.04^
0.05);
0.33^
0.10^
0.02C
0.91C
0.10
0.04
1.10
0.15
0.40
0.01
0.28
0.22
0.09
3.25
Run 2, .
3:1 molar chelant wash
<250 pm >2 mm 250 pm-2 mm <250 um
0.62^
0.02C
0.05C
0.16C
0.04C
0.05^
0.45C
2.1
0.2
1.5
0.15
0.93
0.01
1.87
1.05
0.39
10.7
0.
>2 mm
1.80
0.06
0.03
0.44
0.13
0.03
1.00
0.01
0.10
0.04.
0.05
0.12
0.01
0.06
0.15
0.04
0.85
Run 3,
5% surfactant wash
250 pm-2 mm
0.65
0.12
0.03
0.97
0.25
0.10
2.20
0.02
0.10
0.41
0.15
0.26
0.01
0.18
0.15
0.06
1.90
<250 Mm
1.00
0.54
0.06
5.40
1.40
0.64
12.00
0.30
5.5
2.07
0.36
0.70
0.74
3.60
1.06
0.73
15.4
a As proposed in the Federal Register, Volume 51, No. 114, June 13,
** T®st run not conducted - See Table 5-4, Experimental Design.
e Analysis performed after 14 days holding time expired.
d Estimated value, calibration problem.
1986.
-------
Table 5-9 presents the TCLP results from soil washing of SARM II (low
organic, low metal contamination). The untreated soil sample was below the
regulatory levels for all contaminantsj therefore^ this soil may not require
any treatment if found at these contamination levels at a Superfund site,
For Runs lf 2S and 3, the top two soil fractions (+2 mm and 250 urn to 2 mm)
were below all of the proposed TCLP limits,, with the exception of the Run 1,
H-2-mrn fraction for tetrachloroethylene. The values for this data sets which
showed consistently higher results than the untreated sample for all volatile
organics are estimated values above the value of the highest standard used to
quantify the samples. Unusually high surrogate recoveries were also observed
for this data set. Although the data are presented for completeness sake,
they are considered to be outliers and have not been used to draw conclusions
concerning the effectiveness of the water wash.
SARM III (low organic, high metal contamination) TCLP results are shown
in Table 5-10. The untreated SARM III sample exceeds the regulatory levels
for all contaminants except eh1orobenzene9 pentachlorophenol8 and chromium.
(Generally, chromium was not detected over 0,06 mg/1 in any of the untreated
soil sample TCLP extracts» even though the high-metal SARMS were spiked at a
concentration of 1500 ppnu These low levels are attributable to the fact
that chromium was added as Cr III, which is relatively insoluble,, even under
acidic conditions.) For both Run 1 (water wash) and Run 2 (chelant wash),
the +2-mm and the 250-pm to 2-nm fractions were below the proposed TCLP
limits for all of the volatile and semivolatile organicss with the exception
of the Run 18 250-ym to 2-mm fraction for tstrachloroethylene. However,
these fractions exceeded all the TCLP limits for cadmium and/or lead.
Overalls the chelant $ash was more effective in reducing metal
5-27
-------
TABLE 5-9. PHASE II TCLP RESULTS: SARH II (LOW ORGANICS, LOW
(ppm)
en
i
i\>
CD
Contaminant 1
Volatile organics
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroe thane
Ethyl benzene
Styreue
Tetrachloroethylene
Xylene
Semivolatfle organics
Anthracene
8is(2-ethy1hexyl)
ICtP
8"fi(j$j! I fl £ory uini t r®$ tsd
evel (mg/l)a SARM 11
0.92
1.4 0.05
0.40 0.05
0.12
0.03
0.1 0.05
0.30
0.01
0.22
>2 MB
3.40b
0°.9Sb
0.25.
9 11
2 '32?
_ S3
17^82b
0.02
0.02
Run 1,
water wash
250 iim-2 urn
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.22
0.02b
3.90D
0.01
0.02
<250 urn
0.16*:
0.05C
0.05C
0.08C
0.02^
0.05^
0.17
0.01
0.03
3:
>2 m
0.10
0.01
0.05
0.07
0.02
0.01
0.13
0.01
0.04
Run 2,
1 molar chelant
250 pm-2 mm
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
O.OS
0.15
0.02,
0.03d
wash
<250 pm
0.10
0.02
0.05
0.24
0.06
0.02
0.55
0.02
0.02
0.5X
>2 mm
0.10
0.02
0.05
0.17
0.05
0.01
0.40
0.01
0.01d
Ryn 3,
surfactant wa:
250 yiji-2 mm
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.25
0.07
0.02
0.64
°-02d
0.02°
sh
<250 iim
0.10
0.05
O.OS
0.10
0.02
0.05
0.23
0.01.
0.02°
3.6
Inorganics
0.90
0.01
0.05
0.46
0.01
0.16
0.24
0.04
8 As proposed in the Federal Register, Volume 51, No. 114, Jyne 13, 1986.
Estimated values, values greater than highest standard and high surrogate recovery.
c Analysis performed after 14 days holding time expired.
d Estimated value, identification uncertain.
e Estimated value,, calibration problem.
0.21e
0.61e
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chrotniun
Copper
Lead
Nickel
ZSlK
5.0
1.0
5.0
-
5.0
-
0.15
0.73
0.01
0.89
0.70
0.40
14.6
0.15
0.07
0.01
0.04
0.06
0.15
0.47
0.15
0.32
0.01
0.32
0.68
0.12
6.17
0.18
1.68
0,01
4.49
3.44
0.89
28.2
0.15
0.05
0.01
0.10
0.15
0.04
0.42
0.15
0.07
0.01
0.12
0.15
0.11
0.75
0.15
0.17
0.53
4.12
2.32
0.73
11.7
0.15
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.15
0.12
0.11
0.15
0.23
0.01
0.10
0.15
0.09
3.77
0.60
1.17
0.80
7.15
4.53
0.92
38.4
-------
TABLE 5-10. PHASE II TCLP RESULTS: SARM III (LOW ORGANICS, HIGH METALS)
in
*o
TCLP
regulatory
Contaminant level (ng/1]
Volatile organlcs
Acetone
Cttlorobenzene 1.4
1,2-Dfchloroethane 0.40
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene 0.1
JSylene
Semlvolatlle organlcs
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
ph thai ate 3.6
Pentacftlorophenol
Inorganics
Arsetiic 5.0
Cadmium 3,0
Chromium 5.0
Copper
Lead S.O
Hickel
line
, Untreated
r SARM in
7.10
0.38
0.50
4.60
0.50
0.33
11.00
0.01
0.09
0.348
6.39
33.1
0.01
80.7
19.9
17.5
358.5
>2 mm
0.45C
0.05C
0.05C
0.04C
0.05*;
0.05C
0.10C
0.01
0.02
0.17
0.86
4.95
0.01
1.32
6.46
1.26
50.0
Run 1,
water wash
250 pm-2 mm
6.10
1.10
0.31
9.50
2.80
0.89
30.0
0.01
0.02.
0.93d
1.75
7.79
0,04
6.39
11.67
1.56
52.9
<250 JJ«B
0.40
0.03
0.05
0.32
0.09
0.02
0.90
0.04*
0.02
2.21
8.00
19.16
0.03
144.0
19.85
18.5
320.1
3:1
>2 mm
0.38
0.04
0.05
0.34
0.08
0.03
0.82
0.01
0.02d
0.64
3.67
0.01
1.15
5.27
1.32
46.2
Run 2, Run 3,
molar chelant w2 TOD 250 ym-2 wn ..250 um
0.25
0.02
0.05
0.19
0.06
0.03
0.55
0.01
0.02
0.27
8.12
5.1
1.16
52.6
64.8
8.6
216.4
As proposed in the Federa! Register,, Volume 51, No. 114, June 13, 1986.
Test trm not conducted - See Table 5-4 Experimental Design.
£ Analysis performed after 14 diays holding expired.
Estimated valye, calibration problem.
e Estimated vslue, poor surrogate recoveries.
-------
contamination than was the water wash. Assuming the values reported for
cadmium and lead in the Run 2 coarse and medium-grained fractions are not
significantly greater than the regulatory-limits for these metals, the
chelant wash resulted in a 42 percent reduction (by weight) of contaminated
material. The water wash and surfactant wash did not achieve any volume
reduction for SARM III.
Table 5-11 presents the TCLP results for SARM IV (high organic, high
metal contamination). The untreated soil sample exceeds the regulatory
levels for all contaminants except chromium. For Runs 1, 2S and 3 the top
two soil fractions (+2 mm and 250 ym to 2 mm) were below the TCLP limits for
all of the volatile and semivolatile organics. However, these fractions all
<
exceeded the TCLP limits for cadmium and/or lead. Overall, the chelant wash
was more effective in reducing metal contamination than was the water wash or
surfactant wash. Assuming the value reported for cadmium in the Run 2 coarse
fraction is not significantly greater than its regulatory limits the chelant
wash resulted in a 13 percent reduction (by weight) of contaminated material.
The water wash and surfactant wash did not achieve any volume reduction of
SARM IV.
Tables 5-12 through 5-15 present contaminant percent reduction
efficiencies, which were calculated from the TCLP data contained in Tables
5-8 through 5-11. In general, the highest reduction efficiencies were obtained
for SARM I (high organic, low metal contamination) and SARM IV (high organic,
high metal contamination). Normal1y, higher removal efficiencies can be
expected with higher initial contaminant concentrations. For most washes9
the +2-nm soil fraction exhibited the highest percentage of contaminant
reduction. This observation upholds our primary assumptions of the soil
-------
PHASE II TCLP RESULTS: SARM IV (HIGH ORGANICS, HIGH METALS)
CA>
TCLP
regulatoi
Contaminant level (ng/
Volatile organics
Acetone
Chlorobenzene 1.4
1,2-Dlchloroethane 0.40
EtS»y5 benzene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene 0.1
JSylene
Semfvolatile organics
Anthracene
Bis(2-eefty1hexyl)
phthalate
PentachlorophenoJ 3.6
Inorganics
Arsenic 5.0
Cadmium 1.0
Chromium 5.0
Copper
Lead 5.0
Nickel
line
•y Untreated
'1 18 SARH IV
130
6.
13
47
11
4.
WO
3.
3.
3.
9.
35.
0.
159.
70.
26.
395.
7
S
4
0
8C
58
3
06
9
4
8
§
>2 mn
HFb
0.04
0.02
0.24
0.07
0.03
0.44
0.02
0.02
0.58C
0.94
2.98
0.01
3.01
0.35
1.23
79.5
Run 1,
water wash
250 pw-2 am
Kfb
0.09
0.03
0.94
0.17
0.07
S.57
0.01
0.04
1.60C
2.09
9.05
0.08
14.52
25.20
2.95
175.4
<250 MM
0.47
0.69
0.36
7.33
1.52
0.84
13.23
0.01
1.0
1.9C
10.94
14.7
0.03
210.8
55.43
19.2
326.4
3:
>2 m
0.78
0.07
0.04
0.50
0.14
0.03
1.20
0.01d
0.01
0.37C
0.75
1.62
0.01
1.61
0.40
0.99
41.0
Kun 2,
1 molar chelant wash
250 pm-2 mm
0.67
0.09
Q.01
0.92
0.23
0.09
2.20
0.25
0.22
0.52C
1.91
5.54
0.01
9.88
4.59
2.52
136.9
i <250 pin
1.40
1.50
0.21
15.0
4.20
1.90
36.0
0.01
0.21
8.5°
5.81
10.6
0.65
118.4
151.3
12.2
165.6
Run 3,
0.5% surfactant
>2 mm
1.80
0.02
0.02
0.12
0.03
0.05
0.23
0.11
0.11
0.05
0.97
4.87
0.01
1.94
0.50
1.06
42.5
250 jim- 2 mm
0.81
0.10
0.04
0.78
0.22
0.08
1.80
0,01
0.10
1.28
2.91
9.60
0.25
15.06
28.79
2.73
150.0
wash
<250 urn
1.50
0.17
0.05
2.00
0.46
0.38
5.00
0.11
0.10
1.24
12.8
25.2
2.19
192.0
13.4
21.95
412.8
8 As proposed In the Federal Register, Volume 51, No. 114, June 13,
Hot found dye to interference from methylene chloride.
c Estimated va1yeB calibration problem.
48 Estimated value, identification uncertain.
-------
TABLE 5-12, CONTAMINANT PERCENT REDUCTIONS AS TCLP'
SARM I (HIGH ORGANICS, LOW METALS)
Contaminant
Volatile organics
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Is2-dichloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
Xylene
Overall volatile
organic reduction
Semi volatile Organics
Anthracene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl
p*k4-hts1 a*°^\
pntna i ate j
Pentachlorophenol
Overall semivolatile
organic reduction
Inorganics
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Overall metal
reduction
Run 1
>2 mm
98.8
99.2
99.9
98.5
98.7
99.4
98.1
98,9
85.7
60.0
99.2
98.6
NR
71.7
NR
93.4
69.4
85.2
90.4
87.4
- water wash
250 ym - 2 mm
99.3
99.2
99.9
98.8
98.9
99.4
98.5
99.2
NRb
60.0
85.5
84.0
NR
24.5
NR
54.1
55.1
66.7
64.7
60.9
Run 3 -
>2 mm
98.4
99.8
>99.9
98.4
98.6
99.1
98.4
§8,8
85.7
NR
99.5
98.1
66.7
77.4
NR
90.2
69.4
85.2
90.8
88.6
surfactant wash
250 pm - 2mm
99.4
97.7
>99.9
96.4
97.2
97.0
96.4
98.5
71.4
NR
94.6
93.2
NR
50.9
NR
70.5
69.4
77.8
79.3
75.9
Calculated from data contained in Table 5-8.
NR s no
c Overall reduction efficiencies calculated from total TCLP contaminant
levels in untreated soil versus total TCLP contaminant levels in treated
soil. 5=32
-------
TABLE 5-13. CONTAMINANT PERCENT REDUCTIONS AS TCLPa
SARM II (LOW ORGAMICS, LOW METALS)
1
2 - chelant wash
>2 iran 250 pm - 2 urn
>2
- 2 mm >2 mm
250 pm - 2mm
Is2-dich1oroetharse
NR
1.1
41.7
33.3
80.0
56.7
1.1
50.0
60.0
Overall volatile organic
IA.«, «J8 « • *h JU •» JBIMI^*
22.4
us
95.4
95.5
90.
i.7
Overall semi volatile
i.6
92.9
95.5
91.4
62.5
96.8
56.2
MR
64.0
3.0
70,0
57.7
93 2
•5" *J* » SU,
L7
95.9
NR
94.4
78.6
70.0
99.2
77.9
77.5
74.2
reduction 94.6
55.5
L7
96.4
Calculated from data contained in Table 5-9,
NR = no reduction.
r ^
rrip
IPVF>]<; in imt.rpated soil versus
-------
TABLE 5-14. CONTAMINANT PERCENT REDUCTIONS AS TClPe
SARH III (LOW ORGANICS, HIGH METALS)
Contaminant
Volatile organics
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Is2-dichloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Xylene
Overall volatile
organic reduction
Semivolatile Organics
Anthracene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl
phthalate)
Pentachlorophenol
Overall semivolatile
organic reduction
Inorganics
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Overall metal reduction12
Run 1
>2 mm
93.7
86.8
90.0
99.1
90.0
84.8
99.1
96.8
NR
77.8
50.0
54.5
86.5
85.0
NR
98.4
67.5
92.8
86,0
87.4
- water wash
250 ym - 2 mm
14.1
NR
38.0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
77.8
NR
NR
72.6
76.5
NR
92.1
41.3
91.1
85.2
'84.1
Run 2 -
>2 mm
94.6
89.5
90.0
92.6
84.0
90.9
92.5
92.9
NR
77.8
91.2
86.4
90.0
88.9
NR
98.6
73.5
92,4
87.1
88.7
chelant wash
250 pm - 2mm
96.5
94.7
90.0
94.6
88.0
93,9
93.4
94.3
NR
77.8
NR
2.3
91.4
93.5
NR
98.3
92.2
94.6
92.5
93.5
II
levels in untreated soil versus total TCLP contaminant levels in treated
soil.
5-34
-------
TABLE 5-15, CONTAMINANT PERCENT REDUCTIONS AS TCLPa
SARM IV (HIGH ORGANICS, HIGH METALS)
organics
3 - surfactant
>2 ran 250
- 2
>2 mm 250 pm - 2 mm
>2
250 pm - 2m
l$2-dichloroethane
99.4
99.3
99.6
99.8
99.5
97 9
-f S c «?
98.6
99.7
99.8
99.7
99.7
98.9
99.8
99.4
98.5
99.7
98.3
98.0
98
98
99.1
on
i
UJ
ui
99.4
99.3
99.7
98.7
57.9
99.7
96,7
92.6
86.3
96.3
99.7
96.7
'66.3
i.2
1.3
97.3
86.
1.2
..6
1.3
Li
92.2
95.4
83.3
95.
1.1
80.:
93.5
90.6
1.1
90.0
86.2
83.3
98.8
99.3
96.1
72 .-8
NR
90.6
59.1
89.8
62.1
93.3
76.9
92.6
Calculated from data contained in Table 5-11,
= no reduction.
-------
washing process: 1) that a significant fraction of the contaminants are
attached to the smaller particles (silt, humus, and clay); and 2) that a
physical washing of the sand/gravel/rock fraction will effectively remove the
finer particles, and thus most of the contaminants, from the coarse material.
In general8 the volatile organics exhibited high percent reductions.
This is partially attributable to their nature (I.e., many of the volatile
organics were probably lost to the air during the sampling and soil washing
process). Furthermore9 volatiles were generally removed from the SARH with
water as efficiently as they were removed with a surfactant or chelant
solution. This is particularly evident in Tables 5-12 and 5-15 where the
reduction efficiencies have been calculated for the high-organic-contaminated
soils (SARM I and IV), The low organic contaminated soils (SARM II and III)
show less conclusive results because the concentrations are often at or near
the detection limits, fefhen the numbers are this lows a slight change in
concentration can exaggerate the resulting effect on removal efficiencies.
The semivolatile organics showed a wide variation in removal efficiencies,
Again, the best removal efficiencies for the semivolatiles were obtained with
SARM I and SARM IV (high-organic-contaminated soils). However^ as In the
case of the volatiless none of the wash solutions obtained consistently
better results than any of the other solutions. As indicated In Tables 5-8
through 5-11 (and In Section 5-10), many of the semivolatile organic results
identification uncertainties, and low surrogate recoveries. Therefore8 it is
inappropriate to draw definitive conclusions relative to the removal
efficiencies of different wash solutions with respect t© the semivolatiles.
-------
Contaminant reduction efficiencies for the metals were consistently
higher for the chelant wash than for the water or surfactant washes. The
water and surfactant washes showed similar results in terms of metal concentra-
tion reduction. However9 the overall removal efficiencies for metals in the
top two soil size fractions (+2-mm and 250-pm to 2-mm) were higher with the
chelant wash. The greatest difference in contaminant reduction efficiencies
can be seen in the 250-ym to 2-nun soil size fraction. The overall average
percent reduction for all metals in the 250-ym to 2-mm soil fraction for
water and surfactant washes was 66.9 and 73.4 percent, respectively* whereas
the average metal percent reduction in the same soil size class for the
chelant wash was 87.5 percent. The +2-mm soil size class showed a similar
pattern of metals removal. Howevers the differences in overall removal
efficiencies for water9 surfactant, and chelant washes (89.29 92.59 and 92,2
percent, respectively) were less pronounced than for the middle soil fraction.
5.8.2 Total Waste Analysis Results
A total waste analysis for the 17 spiked compounds was performed on each
of the three size fractions according to the methods contained in SH-846S 3rd
edition. To ensure accuracy of the datas all Phase II analyses were run in
iicate. Consequently, all values reported in this section are averages of
in Appendix D of this report.
Tables 5-16 through 5-19 present the results of the prewash analysis for
each SARM. The experimental procedure for the prewash is described in
Section 5.6.1, This portion of the bench-scale soil-washing evaluation was
tions prior to soils washing of the SARHS. As can be seen from the data in
5-37
-------
5-16, PHASE II
I
contaminant
>2
soil,
a
250 pm-2 mm
<250
Volatile organies
01
i
to
00
1.2-
33
Tetrachloroethylene
Xylene
51
11
22
0.029
m®
0.097
38
8.2
25
3.5
4.8
2.8
10.3
n&
.*t
5.3 •
35.6
ND
0.78
26
3,800
1,400
110
4.3
11.2
2.3
30.6
">Q A
CO,^
6.8
151
34
42
300
720
18200
63
18.4
26.4
40.2
358
"3~in
J/U
32.6
678
-------
TABLE 5-17. PHASE II PREWASH RESULTS
II (LOW ORGANIC, LOH HETAL CONTAMINATION)
II target
Untreated soil,
>2
250 pm-2 mm
<250
1,2-Dichloroethane
tyi
Seraivolatile ©rganics
320
100
60
650
250
20
2.1
0.010
5,2
3.2
19.4
2.4
0o26
0.024
60
50
7.2
5.8
41.7
53.0
9.4
257
3.8
0.034
<0.021
0.23
0.26
<0.026
12
27.2
45.4
56.5
495
516
47.3
1,
-------
TABLE 5-18. PHASE II PREWASH RESULTS
SARM III (LOW ORGANIC, HIGH HETAL CONTAMINATION)
III target
Untreated soil,
>2 mm
250 pm-2 mm
<250
1.2-Dichloroethane
Semivolatile organics
60
650
250
1.
22,
0.
1.
12
60.8
321
24.5
2.7
0,28
0.023
0.31
2.0
88.1
288
19.4
278
,200
7.6
0.64
<0.28
12
2A
1.5
18200
880
682
9360
-------
TABLE 5-19. PHASE II PREWASH RESULTS
IV (HIGH ORGANIC, HIGH METAL CONTAMINATION)
!82-D1chloroethane
Semivolatile organics
01
IV target
aminant
level9 ppm
500
1.
22,500
Untreated soil9a ppm
>2 mm
250 pm-2
<0.028
320
3.7
5.0
0.30
0.090
2.1
ND
0.22
58
110
291
54.4
743
113
<250
300
[9000
750
520
8S300
59700
929
229000
23,800
36,
-------
Tables 5-16 through 5-19, size classification of the SARMS by wet-sieving
proved effective in physically separating the contaminants from the coarse
and medium-grained materials (+250-um size fraction) and concentrating them
in the fines (-250-ym size fraction). These results support the basic
assumptions underlying the volume-reduction approach to soils washing (i.e.,
that a significant fraction of the contaminants are attached to the fines,
and that the coarse material can be cleaned by physically separating and
concentrating the fines).
Although this prewash analysis was originally intended to serve as a
baseline by which to judge the effectiveness of the various washing
solutionSs it is clear that the contaminants were effectively mobilized by
simple water rinses during the wet sieving procedure* This demonstrates that
for soils that have contacted contaminants for only a short period of time
(such as the SARMS or spill site soils), particle size separation techniques
may significantly reduce the volume of contaminated soil. In preliminary
bench-scale experiments8 it was determined that the SARM is approximately 13
percent by weight coarse materials 29 percent by weight medium-grained
materials and 58 percent by weight fines. Therefore8 the data presented in
Tables 5-16 through 5-19 indicate that for the SARMS, at least a 13 percent
reduction and possibly a 42 percent reduction (by weight) of the volume of
contaminated soil can be achieved by an efficient particle size separation,
Tables 5-20 through S-23 present the results from Phase II soil washing
of each SARM. In generals there are no apparent differences between the
water washg the 3:1 molar ehelant wash, and thi 0.5 percent surfactant wash
for cleaning of the +2-mm soil fraction. As hypotbesizeds the silt and clay
particles appear to be attached to the sand and gravel primarily by physical
-------
TABLE 5-20. PHASE II RESULTS: SARM I (HIGH ORGANICS, LOW METALS)
in
us
Target
contaminant
Contaminant level, ppm
Volatile organics
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Oiehloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
Tetracfiloroethylene
Xylene
Senlvolatlle orgarcics
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethy1he»ty1)
phthalate
Pentschlorophenol
Inorganics
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
6800
400
600
3200
1000
600
8200
6500
2500
1000
10
20
30
190
280
30
450
>2 im
10
0.028
<0.023
0.13
ND
0.009
0.38
6.5
4.0
66
3.0
7.3
1.5
10.6
11.1
3.2
44.8
Run 1,
water wash
250 pm-2 mm
20
0.28
0.18
1.4
MD
0.12
3.2
3200
92
26
5.2
11.3
2.6
30.5
28.8
7.8
106
Run 2,
3:1 molar chelant wash
<250 urn >2 mm 250 pm-2 am <250 pm
140
160
24
2300
400
250
1800
1400
1600
53
18.6
28.8
43.4
387
402
35.1
726
Run 3,
0.5% surfactant wash
>2 ran
22
0.30
0.15
2.3
<0.17
0.20
4.0
3.3
<6.1
8.4
4.5
6.9
3.0
11.8
10.1
5.1
47.9
250 ym-2 mm
8.0
1.0
0.32
8.5
NO
0.8S
14
2500
100
4.6
5.8
11.0
3.0
34.6
40.1
6.8
101
<250 pm
50
31
6.0
680
96
49
820
2700
1600
'ND
19.1
26.2
46.8
384
420
31.6
647
Test not conducted - See Table 5-4 Experimental Design.
ND - not detected.
-------
TABLE 5-21. PHASE II RESULTS: SARM II (LOW ORGANICS, LOW METALS)
(ppm)
01
Contaminant
Volatile organlcs
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
I 2-0icft1oroet?tane
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
. Tetrachloroethylem
Kyleue
Sentvolatlle organic
Anthracene
B1s(2-etliylhexy1)
phthalat®
Pentachlorophenol
Inorganics
Arsenic
Chrowlum
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Target
contaminant
level, ppB
680
40
60
320
100
e 60
820
s
650
250
100
10
20
30
190
280
30
450
>2 mm
0.50
0.002
NO
0.014
0.016
ND
0.040
3.2
27
ND
2.5
6.0
<0.88
5.0
4.0
4.0
21.0
Run 1,
water wash
250 wra-2 mm
0.31
0.013
<0.004
0.082
0.13
<0.004
0.31
180
46
6.8
4.2
30.2
4.0
25.4
69.0
7.2
107
Run 2,
3:1 molar chelant wash
<250 pm
0.50
<0.23
ND .
0.14
0.25
<0.22
0.52
830
370
4.6
24.8
55.6
90.4
652
710
S8.6
1380
>2 IM 250
0.58
<0.004
JJD
0.005
<0.006
m
0.021
8.8
40
ND
3.9
2.0
1.6
8.2
6.2
4.2
28.3
pm-2 mi
1.2
0.006
0.003
0.058
0.066
<0.004
0.20
210
44
5.1
4.4
4.0
3.4
15.6
12.6
7.0
63.6
<250 pm
2.7
0.020
0.003
0.13
0.12
0.009
0.44
660
260
m
12.6
7.5 '
69.7
238
110
43.0
546
0.
>2 mm
0.46
0.002
TO
0.009
0.010
no
0.028
1.6
28
2.4
3.0
4.8
2.7
9.0
8.5
3.2
25.8
Run 3,
5% surfdctant
250 pm-2 mm
0.75
0.002
0.004
0.015
<0.013
ND
0.040
120
32
7.8
3.6
9.4
3.5
28.6
31.8
6.8
112
wash
<250 pra
1.8
ND
HO
0.62
0.28
<0.30
1.3
700
160
• ND
27.8
37.7
56.6
478
511
41.8
906
not detected.
-------
5-22. PHASE II RESULTS: SARM II
(ppm)
(LOU ORGANICS, HIGH METALS)
Contaminant
Volatile organics
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Xylene
Semivolatile organics
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl5
phthalate
Pefttachlorophenol
Inorganics
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Cooler
*»**^j^*. *
Lead
fjickel
Zinc
Target
contaainant
level, fjpw
680
40
60
320
100
60
820
650
250
100
500
1,000
1,500
9,500
14,000
1,000
22,500
>2 im
0.74
0.008
<0.004
0.040
0.026
0.002
0.10
<5.6
2.2
9.2
54.6
372
3.8
68.4
122
18.6
558
Run 1,
water wash
250 iim-2 ran
1.7
0.16
0.024
1.3
<0.30
0.16
2.6
480
7.4
40
102
276
14.8
264
491
42.2
1010
<250 pm
16
1.6
0.084
34
6.4
3.0
58
1.800
1,100
59
1,160
746
2,590
20,800
30.600
1,570
48,200
3:1
>2 rrsn
0.96
0.011
0.002
°-854
0.006
0.091
1.7
3.4
<6.6
36.6
290
3.2
38.6
98.1
17.5
500
Run 2, Run 3, d
1 molar chelant wash 0.52 surfactant wash
250 ym-2 mi
2.6
0.23
0.034
2.0
0.55
0.23
3.6
540
9.4
13
51.0
116
9.2
104
171
28.2
519
<250 pra >2 ran 250 um-2 mm <250 pm
3.3
1.2
<0.050
20
3.0
2.2
31
1800
790
<96
243
no
1940
2250
1470
472
6760
Test run not conducted - See Table 5-4 Experimental Design.
= not detected.
-------
TABLE 5-23. PHASE II RESULTS: SARH IV (HIGH ORGANICS, HIGH METALS)
Contaminant
Volatile organlcs
Acetone
Chlorobenzeme
iB2-01ch1oroetl!dpe
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
letrachl oroethy 1 ene
Xylene
Semlvolatlle organic!
Anthracene
81s{2-etNy1hexyl )
phthalate
Pentachlorophenol
Arsenic
' Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
H1cte1
Zinc
Target
contaminant
level, ppw
6800
400
600
3200
1000
600
8200
6500
2500
1000
10
20
30
190
280
30
450
>2 mm
5.8
0.020
0.028
0.080
fJD
<0.017
0.18
28
5.8
23
126
348
7.7
148
168
29.8
873
Run I,
water wash
250 um-2 mm
5.8
1.5
<0.34
15
<2.8
2.3
25
2700
34
39
no
286
29.0
467
1260
56.4
3320
Run 2,
3:1 molar chelant wash
<250 inn
120
68
<8.6
2,000
150
120
3,200
5,200
3,100
360
924
643
2,180
18,400
23,900
1,240
36,200
>2 mm 250
16
0.012
<0.004
0.051
<0.026
0.006
0.11
40
9.6
8.4
63.4
279
6.4
80.6
103
19.4
5B8
pm-2 urn
21
1.4
2 urn
14
0.076
0.10
0.52
0.17
0.048
0.86
2.4
<5.6
38
30
308
5.9
63.1
68.4
14
462
Run 3,
.5% surfactant
250 ym-2 pm
15
0.94
<0.30
7.4
NO
1.1
26
1800
26
42
110
336
32.5
446
818
62.9
3040
Wdih
<250 pin
53
22
4.4
300
54
45
460
5,800
1,500
100
538
739
1,500
11,100
15,000
618
25,400
not detected.
-------
processes, such as compaction and adhesion. These physical attractions are
often related to the age of the soil and the contact time between the
contaminants and soil particles. Because.the SARH is a synthetic waste, the
forces of attraction are relatively weak, a condition more typical of a spill
site soil than an older9 abandoned CERCLA site soil. Consequently, the water
wash was as effective in cleaning the +2-mm soil fraction as the other water
plus additive solutions.
Removal of contaminants from the medium-grained fraction (250-pm to
2-mm) appears to entail both physical and chemical processes. By nature,
this middle soil fraction, which is composed of medium to fine sands does not
absorb contaminants to the degree that clays and silts do. In comparison of
the water wash and the 3:1 molar chelant wash, a marked reduction in the
residual concentration of metals can be seen. This trend is particularly
apparent in the data for SARM III (Table 5-22) and is also evident in the
data for SARM IV (Table 5-23). The organics show less variation between
experiment runs in this soil size class. For the most parts water is as
effective as the surfactant wash for reducing the level of contamination.
The one anomaly is anthracene9 which shows particularly high levels in the
medium soil class. It appeared that anthracene was not fully dissolved prior
to addition into the SARMj flakes of what was believed to be anthracene were
observed on the 60-mesh screen during the washing experiments,
Reduction of contaminants in the fine soil fraction (less than 250 ym)
appears to be more affected by the use of different wash solutions than in
the other soil fractions. The chelant wash (Run 2) significantly reduced
metal contamination in the fine soil fraction, as can be seen in Tables 5-21
through 5-23. This reduction is particularly evident in Tables 5-22 and
5-23$ in which high metal contamination was originally present. Although the
5-47
-------
spent wash water was not analyzed, It can be assumed that chelation
effectively mobilized metals into solution. Similar1y9 the surfactant wash
(Run 3) significantly reducted the organic contamination in the fine soil
fraction, as evident in Tables 5-20 and 5-23 for the high-organic-content
SARMS. Again5 the wash water was not analyzed; however, it can likewise be
assumed that the surfactant successfully mobilized organics into solution.
5.9 SCALE-UP
The EPA Mobile Soil Washing System was selected as a model to scale-up
the results of the Phase II soil washing experiments and project these results
into terms of processing rates and costs.
Although a pilot scale unit9 and not in commercial use$ the MSWS has the
components of mineral/mining process streams. More importantly, its
performance has been quantified for use as a corrective action technology for
contaminated soils (Shurn8 1987). Its functions have also been incorporated
into a computer model (Nash9 1987).
The Mobile Soil Washing System (MSWS) consists of two principal pieces
of trailer mounted hardware. The first is the drum screen unit (DSU)
schematically shown in the upper portion of Figure 5-3. The second unit is a
froth flotation unit shown in the lower half of Figure 5-3. Both of these
units require support equipment to operate. Earth moving equipment is needed
to bring ths soil to the drum screen and a wastewater treatment system is
required to allow the recycling of the spent wash fluid.
Contaminated soil is fed into the system through a soil feed meter on
the drum screen. In order for the meter to works cobbles larger than one
-------
inch in diameter must be screened out of the soil. This is done using a one
inch by two inch grate to cover the loading hopper of the MSWS. The soil
meter is then able to deliver soil to the-first screen at a controlled rate.
The drum screen separates the soil into two particle classifications —
greater than two millimeters (4-2 mm) and less than two millimeters (-2 mm).
The +2-mm particles are tumbled and washed in the drum section. This process
starts inside the first cylindrical screen. While the screen rotates the
soil is tumbled and broken-up by high pressure streams of water from "water
knives". Soil that is fine enough to pass through the screen becomes part of
a slurry that is pumped to the froth flotation unit.
The +2-mm particles (gravel) are tumbled into the drum over baffles,
The drum, as well as both screens9 are operated on an incline. It is this
incline in combination with the rotation that causes the gravel to move down
the drum. The residence time in the daw is approximately fifteen minutes
depending on the incline and speed of rotation. During this washings
additional material that is less than two millimeters is removed from the
gravel.
The +2-mm particles (gravel) are tumbled into the drum over baffles.
The drums as well as both screens, are operated on an incline. It is this
incline in combination with the rotation that causes the gravel to move down
the drum. The residence time in the drum is approximately fifteen minutes
depending on the incline and speed of rotation. During this washings
additional material that is less than two millimeters is removed from the
A second screen at the discharge end of the drum allows for a final
separation of the two sizes. A dilute slurry of the fine particles under the
-------
t
V
momentum of water from a second set of water knives passes through the screen
and is pumped to the nozzles of the first screen, as shown on Figure 5-3.
Meanwhile, the gravel is given a final rinse with sprays of clean wash fluid
before discharge into bins or directly back to the ground.
The slurry created in the sump of the first screen is pumped from the
drum screen to the first cell of the four chamber froth flotation unit. In
this cells as in each of the other three 200 gallon capacity eel Is, the
slurry is agitated and sparged. If a froth is formed by this action it is
skimmed from the surface by a rotating paddle wheel. The non-frothed slurry
is pumped to a hydrocyclone*
The function of a hydrocyclone is to remove solid particles from a
-------
CONTAJySSNATED
SOIL
in
B
in
TO VAPOR
CONTROL
\ /
SOIL
FEED
METER
I?jO...
F8RST
SCREEN
s
r —
CLEAN WASH FLU8D
"GRAVEL WITH SOME "-aim". •/."•
SECOND
SCREEN
WASHED
HYDROCYCLQNE {<»J
CLEAN WASH FLUID
TO
CELL 4
CLEAN S08L SLURRY
Figure 5-3. Schematic of the Mobile Soil Washing System.
-------
deposited in the cell to the right of the hydrocyclone's feed source. The
overflow is deposited to the left of the hydrocyclone's feed source. This
countercurrent process results in two effluent streams from the froth
flotation unit. They are: 1) the majority of the soil in a concentrated
slurry that is considered the clean soil, and 2} the majority of the spent
wash fluid along with the finer fractions of the soil. Because of this
countercurrent processs the froth flotation unit is generally referred to as
the countercurrent unit (CCU).
In considering scale-up from the bench scale experiments conducted in
this study to use of the mobile soil washer9 the treatment of the residuals
from the countercurrent unit must be taken into account in evaluating the
MSWS as an economical technology alternative. For the purpose of identifying
an over all expected performance and because of this study's findings that
"none of the variables appear to have a more significant effect on organic
contaminant reduction than any of the others" all of the data was analyzed as
coming from equivalent treatments. Expected process wastewater stream
concentrations were calculated based on the difference between initial and
final contaminant levels for SARM I and II. Final concentrations of the soil
were determined by mathematically reconstituting the soil using the total
waste analyses for the three size fractions and the weight percent distribu-
tion of the uneontaminated SARM soil. The waste stream flow coming away from
the MSWS was calculated from the 10:1 washing ratio used in the study.
Depending on the soil9 SARM I, II, III, or IV and the washing process
the effluent streams from the MSSsfS could contain the following in pounds per
5-52
-------
Volatiles Semi-volatiles _____
High value 700-800 200-300 300-500*
Low value 100-120 30-40 30-40
Projection based on low metals value.
According to the EPA Treatabillty Manual (EPA9 1983) the waste stream
would require a combination of vapor stripping and vapor recovery^ carbon
absorptions and chemical precipitation with sedimentation or filtration.
Precipitation/coagulation data given in the manual for heavy metals indicate
a 100 to 200:1 ratio for such things as ferric sulfates alum* lime and sodium
hydroxide to the heavy metal present. The techno]ogies required to support
soil washing (i.e., treatment of the HSUS residualss -2-mm soil) of a SARM IV
type soil would be significant! the closest industrial situation would be
industries involved in metal processing and finishing. There are no
treatability studies that could be found to evaluate this process waste water
stream. However, based on the treatability of the metalss some of the
treatment chemicals would rival or exceed the quantity of contaminants
present in the original soils.
Based on the computer model, the cost of washing soil in a way
compatible with the BOAT Phase II lab study would cost between $260 and $280
per cubic yard. This is based on $0.50 per pound washing additive9 a $0.02
per gallon wastewater treatment cost and doing the work near Cincinnati Ohio.
The processing rate calculates out to 18 cubic yards per twelve hour days for
the model„ Due to a number of factors, shift rates are 50 percent of best
5-53
-------
instantaneous rates. This cost does not include the cost of landfill ing the
contaminated residuals.
5.10 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
All total waste analyses were performed in duplicate to ensure that any
variation in sampling and analytical methods would be minimized. All values
reported in Tables 5-16 through 5-23 are average values calculated as an
arithmetic mean from the individual resultss which can be found in Appen-
dix D. Matrix spikes (MS) and matrix spike duplicates (MSD) were analyzed on
selected samples to calculate precision and accuracy for the data set.
Tables 5-24 through 5-29 show the results of the MS/HSD analysis for the
middle soil fraction (2-mm to 250-ym) of SARM II and SARM IV. All MS/MSD
analyses can'be found in Appendix D. The middle size fraction was chosen for
inclusion in this section because it represents neither unusually high nor
Tables 5-24 and 5-25 present the MS/MSD for metals in SARM II and
IV, respectively. In Table 5-24? lead and zinc were both spiked at less than
two times their native concentrationsj therefore a lead was not recovered and
zinc showed an elevated precision (relative percent difference,, RPD). Where
appropriate spike levels were useds precision and accuracy were within the
objectives of less than 20 and 75 to 1258 resp@ctively8 as shown in
The results for volatile organic MS/MSD are shown in Tables 5-26 and
analyte concentration (Table 5-19), QA/QC objectives were not met as often.
Furthermore,, the soil sampled for the QA/QC analysis appears to be variable
5-54
-------
TABLE 5-24. SARM II EXPERIMENTAL RUN 1, 2 mm TO 250 wm SOIL FRACTION
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY FOR METALSd'u
Concen-
tration
spike
added
Compound MS
Arsenic 43.8
Cadmium 43.8
Chromium 43.8
Copper 43.8
Lead 43.8
Nickel 43.8
Zinc 43.8
Concen-
tration
spike
added
MSD
47.1
47.1
47.1
47.1
47.1
47.1
47.1
Sample
result
4.1
9.3
4.2
24.2
103
6.7
78.6
Concen-
tration
MS
43.3
48.7
37.2
66.9
67.4
40.7
223
Percent
recovery
90
90
75
97
Od
78
130d
•
Concen-
tration
MSD
44.1
49.1
38.9
58.2
59.8
41.5
116
Percent
recovery
85
85
74
72
a
od
74
79
RPDC
5.7
5.7
1.3
30
0
5.3
123
a Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis,
b MS s Matrix spikes MSD - Matrix spike duplicate.
Spike added is approximately 2 times less than native analyte,
TABLE 5-25. SARM IV EXPERIMENTAL RUN 3S 2 mm TO 250 ym SOIL
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY FOR METALS
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
516 563 105
29060 29250 311
516 563 30.2
2,060 28250 390
29060 28250 657
516 563 52.1
109300 11S300 1980
600
29230
489
28610
2,430
523
129600
96
93
89
108
86
91
103
707
2,390
536
2,640
38130
595
149300
107
92
90
100
102
96
109
11
l.-l
1.1
7.7
17
5.3
5,7
MS » Matrix spike, MSD « Matrix spike duplicate.
-------
TABLE 5-26. SARM II EXPERIMENTAL RUN 1, 2 mm TO 250 pm SOIL FRACTION
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS*
Concen-
tration Concen- Percent Coneen-
spike Sample tration re- tration re
Acetone
1,2
120
310
130
108
130
250
370
128
125
108
108
105
112
0
0
7.9
0
13
Concentration units are p
juantitation limit - 6.
This compound has a quantisation limit of 2 times that listed.
ND - Not detected.
5-1
-------
TABLE 5-27. SARM IV EXPERIMENTAL RUN 3S 2 mm TO 250 ym SOIL FRACTION.
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE -RECOVERY FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS3'®'0
Concen-
spike Sample tration re-
result MS covery MSD covery RPD1
Acetone 15,000 6,600 12,000 36 13,i
Is2-Dichloroethane 3,100 <3100 3S300 102 39200 99 3.0
3,100 19900 5S200 106 69300 142 5.6
Ethyl benzene 78400 17,000 289000 149 368000 257 53
3S100 1,800 48900 100 59700 126 23
3,100 5,100 88900 123 119000 190 43
enes 3S100 329000 38,000 194 518000 613
Concentration unit;' are pg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis.
Quantitation limit - 310.
Moisture « 19.27.
e < - Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
5-57
-------
TABLE 5-28. SARM II EXPERIMENTAL RUN 1, 2 mm TO 250 ytn SOIL FRACTION
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS'
Concen-
tration Concert- Percent Concen- Percent
!e tration re- tration re-
Compound added result MS covery MSD covery RPDC
lore- 149000 (MS) 5.100 49300 -5.7 5S600 3.3 750
phenol 15,000 (MSD)
Anthracene 56S000 (MS) 1009000 120,000 36 2009000 164 130
618000 (MSD)
18 63,000 61 110
hexyl) 31,000 (MSD)
a Concentration units are yg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis.
Percent moisture - 19.12.
TABLE 5-29= SARM IV EXPERIMENTAL RUN 3S 2 m TO 250 wm SOIL FRACTION
tration Concen-
ie tration re-
e\
covery RPD
1S4009000 680,000 0 410,
25S000 1809000 54 190,000 57 5.'
c Quantitation limit - 12S000.
5-58
-------
estimated or anticipated to fall within a certain range prior to preparation
of the spike standard. This situation is particularly evident in the semi-
volatile organic MS/MSD results presented in Tables 5-28 and 5-29. In general,
both the precision^ expressed as relative percent difference, and the accuracy,
expressed as percent recoverys are low for the semivolatile organic data.
Therefore, caution should be used in interpreting the semivolatile organic
removal efficiencies from the soil-washing experiments.
The TCLP analyses were performed under separate contracts and therefore,,
a full QA/QC discussion of the TCLP data will be included in a separate
report which will cover all the TCLP data from the five technologies that
ili;
duplicate analyses, laboratory blank analyses, one! extraction blank analyses
were performed on the TCLP samples. The results of these QA/QC analyses can
-------
SOIL WASHING REFERENCES
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Technology Screening Guide for
Treatment of Contaminated Soils and Sludges (Review Draft), Prepared
for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, by the Office of Pol icy, Budget, and Program
Management under Contract No. 68-01-7053. 1987.
2. Scholzs Ro8 and J. Milanowski. Mobile System for Extracting Spilled
Hazardous Materials From Excavated Soils. EPA-600/2-83-100, October
3erins E. S. Laboratory Feasibility Testing of Prototype Soil Washing
Concepts (Draft). Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agencys Oil and Hazardous Materials Spill Branehs by IT Corporation.
Exner? J. H., et al. Detoxification of Chlorinated
Chlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzofurans in the Total Environment II, L. H,
Keith8 C. Rappe, and G. Choudhraya eds. Butterworth Publishers^ Bostons
1985.
EIHs, W. D., J. R. Payne, and G. D.
Soils With Aqueous Surfactants (Interim Report), Prepared for the U.
Environmental Protection Agency» Hazardous yaste Engineering Research
6. Ellis, W. D., and T. Fogg, Project Summary; Treatment of Soils
Contaminated With Heavy Metals. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agencys Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory„
Corporation under Contract No. 68-03-3113. September 1985,
7. Ellis, W. D., and T.
Contaminated With Heavy Metals. Prepared for the ILS. Environmental
Protection Agency9 Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory,
8. Castle, C.g et al. Research and Development of a Soil Washing System
for Us®- it Syperfund Sites. In: Proceedings of the. 6th National
Conference ©n Management ©f Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sit@s8
Washington D.C., November 4-69 1985. Hazardous Materials Control
Research Institutes Silver Spring, Mary]andg 1985.
-------
Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emergency Branch,
by Enviresponse, Inc., under Contract Ho, 68-03-3255. July
10. Dietz, D. H., et al. Cleaning Contaminated Excavated Soil Using
Extraction Agents (Draft). Prepared for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratorys by
Foster Wheeler Corporation under Contract No. 68-03-3255. September
1986.
11. PEI AssociateSj Inc. Electromembrane Process for Recovery of Lead From
Contaminated Soils. Phase I Final Report. Prepared for the National
Science Foundation,, Small Buiness Innovation Research Program, under
Grant No. ISI-8S60730, July 1986.
12. PEI Associatess Inc. Treatability Study: Sartell Lagoon No. 3 Sludge9
DeZurik. Prepared for DeZurik» a Unit of General Signal, Sartell,
13. PEI Associates, Inc. Pilot Study Report: Treatment ©f
DeZurik Lagoon No. 3. Prepared for DeZurik9 a Unit of General Signal,
14. The DowT£hemical Company. Keys to Chelation. Promotional literature on
4 S —, «~ ~, — " ^1 f* t^. ^. *% m* JL Jl d> A .a .™ .» .t. ,» 1t f\tt!?
15. Brady, N. C. The Nature and Property of Soils$ 8th ed. MacM1lla>i
Publishing Company, New York. 1974.
16. Shum» J. S. Drum Screen Washer Operation and Maintenance Manual.
Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Hazardous Haste
Hanger-Silas Mason Company, Inc., under Contract NQ* 68-03-3203.
17. Conniek, C. C. Mitigation of Heavy Metal Migration in Soil. In:
Journal of the Mew England lister Pollution Control Association. Volume
19, Number 1. May
18. Overeashs H. R. Dtcomposition of Toxic and Nontoxic Organic Compounds
In Soils. Ann Arbor Science Publisherss Inc.* Ann Arb©r9 Michigan.
J. M.» and M. 6. Johnson. Sand Cleaning Study - Phase I.
Prepartd for th@ U.S* Environmental Protection Ageney8 Municipal
Environmental Research Laboratory, Oil and Hazardous Materials Spills
-------
I, J. S.
System9 Report to the EPA Releases Control Braneh8 Harch 1987.
22, Nash, J, H. and Smith N. K., Computer Modeling of Contaminated Soil
Treatment, Report to the EPA Releases Control Branch, April 1987.
23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Treatability Manual,
EPA~600/2-82-001a9 Februrary 1983. •
-------
SI -
CERCLA BOAT SARM PREPARATION AND RESULTS OF
PHYSICAL SOILS WASHING EXPERIMENTS
(FINAL REPORT)
VOLUME II
Prepared by:
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246-0100
Contract No. 68-03-3413
Work Assignment No. 0-7
Prepared for:
Richard P. Traver, P.E., Technical Project Monitor
Releases Control Branch
Land Pollution Control Division
Edison, New Jersey 08837
Jennifer Haley
Hazardous Site Control Division
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Washington, D.C. 20460
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HAZARDOUS WASTE ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY
26 WEST ST. CLAIR STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
October 30, 1987
-------
APPENDIX A
BENCH-SCALE EXPERIMENTS ON SARM BLENDING
A-l
-------
APPENDIX A
BENCH-SCALE EXPERIMENTS ON SARM BLENDING
The overall objective of the bench-scale SARM blending was four-fold:
1) To "fine-tune" the clean soil matrix to meet specified criteria
2) To determine a methodology for bench-scale SARM blending;
3) To determine the clay mineralogy of the clean soil matrix; and
4) To determine procedures for full-scale blending.
The "fine-tuning" of the clean soil matrix was accomplished through the prep-
aration of a series of soil mixes and analyses of critical soil characteris-
tics (identified in Subsection 2.1). The determination of the bench-scale
SARM blending methodology involved identification of mixing apparatus and
establishing the order in which the chemical contaminants/analytes would be
mixed together and then blended with the soil. Selection of the clay miner-
alogy was based on the results of blending the contaminants with several clay
types and observation of the changes that occurred such as alteration of
cation exchange capacity.
Once the first three objectives were met, an effort to meet the fourth
objective of determining the full-scale blending procedures was begun. The
order and method(s) of mixing chemicals and soil components, and determining
the quantity of each chemical necessary to reach the target contaminant/ana-
lyte levels was determined at this time.
BENCH-SCALE IMPLEMENTATION
The soil mixing, chemical and soil blending, and sample preparation
associated with the four objectives of the bench-scale study were conducted
A-2
-------
in PEI's laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio. The actual analyses of the soil
samples that were prepared over the course of the bench-scale study were
performed by the laboratories of:
Soil and Material Engineers (SHE),
Fairfield, Ohio
0 H.C. Nutting Company,
Cincinnati, Ohio
0 University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, Ohio
0 Bowser-Morner, Inc.,
Dayton, Ohio
0 Western Research Institute (WRI)
Laramie, Wyoming
U.S. EPA Center Hill Facility,
Cincinnati, Ohio
Equipment, supplies, and materials necessary to complete the bench-scale
activities are presented in ~able A-l, including the source of each item.
The chemicals to be used for the bench- and full-scale operations were
purchased and (with the exception of PCP) were delivered by their respective
suppliers directly to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center Hill
Research Facility (Table A-2). Upon delivery, all chemicals were immediately
placed in a flammable materials storage cabinet designated for this project
by Center Hill staff. The metal compounds were not initially intended to be
placed in the storage cabinet, but after determining that there was suffi-
cient space, all chemicals were stored in this locked cabinet. Once all the
necessary chemicals had arrived, the quantity of each chemical needed for
bench-scale work (Table A-2) was measured out and placed in containers for
transport to the PEI laboratory. The portions of organic chemicals brought
to the laboratory were placed in a flammable materials storage cabinet where
A-3
-------
TABLE A-l. LIST OF EQUIPMENT AND LABORATORY APPARATUS
Item
Analytical balance (0.01 and 0.001 g)
EP toxicity extraction mixing apparatus
500-g glass sample containers with Teflon
seals and lids
Fume hood
Glass spray bottles
Pipettes
2.5-gallon glass jars with lids
1-gallon plastic jars
Glass rods
Graduated cylinders
Scupulas
Soil scoops
Fireproof waste receptacle
55-gallon steel drum
1-gallon PVC buckets with lids
- Laboratory tissue (Kimwipes)
- Vermiculite
t- Spill pads
Organic vapor analyzer (OVA) equipped
with portable GC
Flammable materials storage cabinet
Health and safety personal protective gear
Quantity
2
1
35
1
5
20
2
10
5
2
10
3
1
1
10
1 box
5-gallon
container
2 boxes
1
1
a
Source
PEI
PEI
Fisher Scientific,
Cincinnati, Ohio
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
Fisher Scientific,
Cincinnati , Ohio
PEI
PEI
Fisher Scientific,
Cincinnati, Ohio
Queen City Barrel ,
Cincinnati, Ohio
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PEI
and associated equipment
Alconox
Bottle brush
Deionized water supply
0.5 gallon
1
Fisher Scientific,
Cincinnati, Ohio
PEI
PEI
Discussed and itemized in Subsection 3.2.6.
Detergent used for decontaminating equipment and laboratory apparatus.
A-4
-------
TABLE A-2. CHEMICAL QUANTITIES FOR BENCH SCALE
Chemical'
Approximate quantity
(grams)
Source
Volatiles
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethene
Acetone
Chlorobenzenec
Styrene
Semivolatiles
Anthracene
Pentachlorophenol
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Metals
Lead (PbS04)
Zinc (ZnO)
Cadmium (CdSO^)
Arsenic (As«0^)
^ O
Copper (CuS04)
Chromium (Cr^CO
Nickel [Ni(N03)2]
Total
15
38
2
2
31
0
1
60
9
23
184
252
21
6
335
20
28
1027
Kodak
Herbert-Verkamp-Calvert
Kodak
Herbert-Verkamp-Calvert
Herbert-Verkamp-Calvert
Herbert-Verkamp-Calvert
Kodak
Ruetgers Nease
Sigma or Curtin Matheson
Kodak
Eagle Richer
Herbert-Verkamp-Calvert
Aldrich
Aldrich
Herbert-Verkamp-Calvert
Aldrich
Aldrich
All organic chemicals to be used in the bench-scale studies will be stored
in a flammable materials storage cabinet and used only in a fume hood
equipped with a single-pass exhaust system.
Chemical quantities shown here represent 2 times the amount of each chemi-
cal that is expected to be used during bench-scale activities. The extra
quantities will serve as reserves. All unused chemicals will be returned
to the Center Hill facility, to the full-scale stock, upon completion of
the bench-scale operation.
Chlorobenzene was not available for bench-scale study.
A-5
-------
they were stored for the duration of the bench-scale operation. The metal
compounds were stored in a designated storage area in close proximity to the
work area.
Extreme care was taken at all times in handling chemicals during the
bench-scale activities in order to minimize the potential for chemical re-
leases to the surrounding laboratory facilities. Appropriate chemical re-
lease prevention and response procedures, and health and safety protocol was
followed, and no spills or exposures were incurred during bench-scale activi-
ties.
All wastes generated during the bench-scale operation, e.g., contam-
inated wipes, contaminated soil, expendable protective equipment, etc., were
placed in a fireproof waste receptacle. At the completion of the bench-scale
work, the accumulated wastes were transported to the Center Hill facility,
where they were containerized along with wastes from the full-scale opera-
tion. All quantities of chemicals not used during bench-scale work were
transported back to the Center Hill facility for use during full-scale blend-
ing operations.
The prevention of chemical releases during the bench-scale operation re-
quired special chemical handling procedures. Of particulate concern was the
potential for releases of organic vapors within the organic prep laboratory
(extraction/preparation area of the PEI laboratory) where the bench-scale
fume hood is located. A release of this nature could potentially have con-
taminated laboratory facilities and other samples that were being analyzed in
other areas of the laboratory. To minimize the potential of this occurring
and to facilitate a quick response if it did occur, air monitoring was con-
ducted on a continuous basis during the bench-scale operation.
A-6
-------
A Century Model 128 Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA, GC-equipped FID) was
used to monitor organic vapor concentrations both inside and outside the fume
hood. Initial background readings were-obtained in the organic prep labora-
tory prior to beginning work each day. The OVA was used in survey mode to
monitor ambient laboratory air continuously with periodic readings being
obtained from within the fume hood. If the OVA readings had ever increased
significantly above the initial background level the instrument would have
been switched to GC mode and a strip chart of the GC output would have been
recorded. An attempt would have then been made to determine if the SARM
organic compounds being used were the cause of the increased readings. All
such measurements would have been summarized and submitted to the Laboratory
Manager at the end of the bench-scale study. In the event of a vapor re-
lease, the Laboratory Manager would have been notified immediately, at which
time the appropriate response would have been taken.
In addition to air monitoring, transport of chemicals within the labora-
tory was minimized by storing the organics in a flammable materials storage
cabinet located in close proximity to the fume hood. The inorganics were
also stored in close proximity to the fume hood. In this way, transport of
the chemicals through the laboratory complex was minimized, decreasing the
potential for releases. All chemicals that were transported to and from the
bench-scale work area were carried in secondary containment vessels
Staff conducting the bench-scale activities wore Level C protective
clothing, including Tyvek coveralls, safety glasses, and chemical-resistant
gloves suitable for the materials being handled (viton and/or butyl rubber).
Air purifying respirators equipped with combination high-efficiency particu-
late/organic vapor cartridges (replaced once each day, at a minimum) were
kept on hand for use when necessary.
A-7
-------
The following subsections discuss the design and implementation of each
of the four phases used to meet the objectives of the bench-scale operation.
Phase 1 - Preparation of Clean Soil Matrix
The initial step (Phase 1) of the bench-scale work was the "fine-tuning"
of the clean soil matrix to meet the criteria identified during the back-
ground research effort (see Subsection 2.1). The "fine-tuning" Involved
numerous mixing exercises and laboratory analyses to determine the inherent
soil characteristics (grain size, TOC, pH, cation exchange capacity, and
mineralogy) of each soil sample differing in clay mineralogy and attempted
grain size distribution.
Eighty pounds of soil matrix components were delivered to PEI's analyti-
cal laboratory for use during the bench-scale activities. Table A-3 indi-
cates the source and quantity of each soil component.
TABLE A-3. SOIL COMPONENT QUANTITIES FOR BENCH SCALE
Soil component
Approximate
quantity, Ib
Source/location
Sand 20
Silt 20
Clay 18
- Ca - Montmorillonite (6)
- Kaolinite (6)
- Illite (Warren County) (6)
Topsoil 10
Gravel (No. 9) 4
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co./Morrow, OH
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co./Morrow, OH
American Colloid Co./Skoky, ILa
Charles B. Crystal & Co./
Brooklyn, NYD
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co./Morrow, OH
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co./Morrow, OH
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co./Morrow, OH
a Actual source location of montmorillonite is the State of Mississippi.
b Actual source location of kaolinite is the State of Georgia.
Based on the soils analyses that were performed, the following clean
soil recipe was selected for use during the next three phases of the bench-
scale study:
A-8
-------
0 Sand - 25 percent
0 Silt - 25 percent
0 Clay - 40 percent
0 Topsoil - 10 percent
The gravel component was omitted from the bench-scale recipe because it was
found to cause severe problems with the mechanics of any bench-scale mixing
apparatus tested.
Four 1000-g batches of tested soil were prepared using the above recipe.
Each soil was prepared using a different clay mineral (mix) for the clay
fraction. The four clay mineralogies were:
1) mite
2) Montmorillonite
3} Kaolinite
4) Montmorillonite/kaolinite.
In addition to these four soils, 1000 g of sand and 1000 g of the illitic
clay were placed in two separate, labeled jars. Having done this, the four
soils and two soil components were transferred to the laboratory fume hood
area, where all remaining bench-scale work was conducted.
Phase 2 - Determination of SARM Blending Methodology
Phase 2 of the bench-scale study was divided into four steps: 1) iden-
tification of the soil/chemical blending apparatus to be used in the labora-
tory, 2) determination of the physical compatibility of the chemical contam-
inants being used and how they would be blended with the soil material,
3) determination of the overall methodology for blending (e.g., whether the
chemicals would be added to the soils or vice versa, the order and method of
chemical application, etc.), and 4) determination of blending equipment and
methods to be used for full-scale soil mixing.
Step 1: The device selected for blending soils and contaminants during
bench-scale study was the mixing apparatus for the EP Toxicity extraction
A-9
-------
procedure. Figure A-l shows a schematic diagram of this mixing device. It
consisted of a 2-liter stainless-steel canister, retrofitted with a plexi-
glass cover, and a motorized, vertical shaft to which two stainless-steel
blades were attached.
Step 2: The chemicals that could be premixed together were identified
based on solubility and compatibility, and the order that mixtures of chemi-
cals could be blended into the soil material was determined. This was accom-
plished by reviewing the compatibility and solubility of the chemicals being
used (Tables A-4 and A-5), followed by determining whether compatible chemi-
cals could be mixed together to form a homogenous mixture. The quantity of
each chemical used in this mixing exercise was proportional to the total
quantity of each chemical that would be used in the soil/chemical blending
exercises during the later phases of bench-scale testing.
The results of this work indicated that there would be four separate
chemical additives to be blended with the soil material: three mixtures (two
liquid and one dry) and one single, dry chemical. These four additives were
as follows:
0 An aqueous solution of nickel nitrate [Ni(N03)], copper sulfate
(CuSOiJ, and cadmium sulfate (CdSOiJ.
0 A dry mixture of arsenic trioxide (As203), lead sulfate (PbSOiJ,
zinc oxide (ZnO), and chromic oxide (Cr203).
0 A solution of ethylbenzene, xylene, 1,2,-dichloroethane, 1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethy1ene, acetone, styrene, pentachlorophenol, and
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate; and
° Anthracene, as a dry additive.
The next portion of Phase 2 of the bench-scale work was conducted to
determine:
0 Whether chemicals should be added to the soils, or soils added to
the chemicals
A-10
-------
STAINLESS STEEL
CANISTER
PLEXIGLASS
COVER
VERTICAL SHAFT
WITH STAINLESS
STEEL BLADES
Figure A-l. Bench-scale SARM sample blending apparatus.
A-ll
-------
TABLE A-4. BOAT SARM SAMPLE CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITIES
) O;~H< ••.OC'T>
(H') CCV-V
ecu '£i: D:
61
91
91
91
tCVl
91
O- O_ CL I—
Z Z Z
0
z z
z z
z z
Z Z u-
r •> S C
o
Cg
I £
o X
< O
c; r^j
^ ^'
<> ?
o ^
•g
O C-
oo «;
, n
u t—
u. O
O Q< P
2 a >
s I a
A-12
-------
TABLE A-5. BOAT SARM SAMPLE CHEMICAL SOLUBILITIES
Solvent3
Chemical
Anthracene
Pentachlorophenol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl Jphthalate
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethene
Acetone
Chi oro benzene
Styrene
Lead sulfate (PbS04)
Zinc oxide (ZnO)
Cadmium sulfate (3CdS04«8H20)
Arsenic trioxide (As20,)
Copper sulfate (CuS04-5H20)
Chromic oxide (Cr,,03)
Nickel nitrate [N1(N03)2]
a I = Insoluble
SL = Slightly soluble
S = Soluble
V = Very soluble
X = Not applicable
Water
I
SL
I
I
I
SL
I/SL
S
I
I
SL
I
S
ss
S
I
s/vs
Acetone
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
X
S
S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Xylene
S
S
S
S
X
S
VS
S
S
S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Alcohol
S
S
S
S
S
S
VS
S
S
S
I
I
I
I
SS/I
I
S
Source: Based on the MERK Index, 10th edition, 1983 and the Con-
densed Chemical Dictionary, 10th edition, 1981.
A-13
-------
0 Whether chemicals should be applied to certain soil fractions
(e.g., to the sand or clay fraction) before being blended with the
remainder of the soil matrix
0 The method of chemical application to the soil (e.g., sprayed,
poured)
0 The order of application (e.g., organics first, followed by metals,
or visa versa)
This portion of the bench-scale study used water to simulate the solu-
tions instead of using the actual chemicals. Determinations were made by
following the nine-run sequence (A through I) listed below:
A. "Mixed" soil was placed in the mixing apparatus, the motor turned
on, and water poured onto the soil as the blades were turning
- Results Recorded -
B. Clay component was placed in clean mixing cannister, the motor
turned on, the water poured onto the clay as the blades were turn-
ing, then the remaining soil compounds added to wet clay material
with the blades still turning
- Results Recorded -
C. Sand component was placed in clean cannister, the motor turned on,
the water poured onto the sand as the blades were turning, then the
clay added to the wet sand as the blades turned
- Results Recorded -
D. "Mixed" soil was placed in the mixing apparatus, the motor turned
on, and the water applied to the soil as tiny droplets while the
blades were turning
- Results Recorded -
E. Clay component placed in the clean mixing cannister, the motor
turned on, the water applied to the clay as tiny droplets as the
blades turned, then the sand was added to the wet clay material
with the blades still turning
- Results Recorded -
F. Sand component placed in the clean cannister, the motor turned on,
the water applied to sand as tiny droplets as the blades turned,
then the clay was added to the wet sand as the blades turned
- Results Recorded -
A-14
-------
G. Water placed in clean cannister, motor turned on, and mixed soil
added while the blades turned.
- Results Recorded -
H. Water placed in clean cannister, the motor turned on, and the clay
component added as the blades turned
- Results Recorded -
I. Water placed in clean cannister, the motor turned on, and the sand
component added as the blades turned
- Results Recorded -
The results of the mixing sequence outlined above, indicated the follow-
ing:
1) There was no difference in the end products between Runs A, B, and
C or between D, E, or F, i.e.: it did not matter to which soil
componentfs) the water was added, the resulting samples were simi-
lar.
2) There was a difference in the "balling-up" effect of the soil
between Runs A, B, and C and Runs D, E, and F. The soil balled-up
to a much less degree when the water was applied as tiny droplets.
3) The balling-up effect was much greater during Runs G, H, and I when
the soil was added to the water, than during the six other runs.
As the results of these bench-scale activities, the following blending
methodology was selected:
0 Chemicals would be added to the mixed soil (gravel-component not
included) as blades turned
0 Liquid mixtures would be applied to the soil as tiny droplets
0 The inorganic chemical mixtures would be added before the liquid
organics
0 Each sample prepared would be mixed for approximately 2 minutes
The final portion of Phase 2 involved the test mixing of soil and gaso-
3 3
line in a small 3-ft mortar mixer that was identical in design to the 16-ft
mixer that was selected for the full-scale SARM blending operation. The
objective of this effort was: 1) to determine the degree of volatilization
A-15
-------
that would occur during full-scale activities, 2) to determine the actual
quantity of soil material that could be mixed per batch,-and 3) to determine
the consistency of the soil when mixed with different amounts of liquid. The
results of this mixing exercise indicated that the mortar mixer operated well
with as much as 5 percent moisture without any balling up of the soil materi-
al, as found during earlier bench-scale mixing. All OVA readings taken over
the course of the day indicated that organic vapor levels inside the mixer
were greater than the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL).
Phase 3 - Determination of Clay Fraction
The determination of the mineralogy of the clay fraction for the final
soil matrix was based on the results of analyses of soil properties performed
on both "clean" and contaminated soil samples that differed only in clay
mineralogy. The four clay mineralogies that were used for the samples were
as follows:
1) Warren County Clay (illite)
2) Montmori11onite (Ca-based)
3) Kaolinite
4) Montmori11onite/Kaolinite
The objective of this phase was to identify the clay mineralogy that 1) ex-
hibited a moderate cation exchange capacity (CEC of 30 to 50 meq/100 g), and
2) whose inherent properties, in particular its crystalline structure, ex-
hibited the least amount of change due to the application of contaminants.
The initial step of Phase 3 involved the measurement of 500-g of four
"clean" soil samples, with the only variable being the clay mineralogy. Each
sample was taken from the 1000-g batches prepared and stored during Phase 1
of the bench-scale work. Next, the chemical mixtures determined in Phase 2
were prepared and added to form 500 g of soil contaminated at the high con-
taminant levels (20,000 ppm total organics and 50,000 ppm total metals). The
A-16
-------
individual chemical quantities needed were calculated through the use of a
computer program developed specifically for the BOAT project. The program
was used throughout the bench-scale work to determine the quantities of
chemicals that were theoretically needed to produce desired levels of con-
taminants, based on soil quantities and the given chemical proportions and
purities. Based on this computer program, the individual chemical quantities
needed to achieve high contaminant levels in 500 g of soil were as follows:
Quantity
Chemical (grams)
As203 (As) 0.330
SCdSOi, • 8H20 (Cd) 1.141
Cr203 (Cr) 1.096
CuSOi» • 5H20 (Cu) 18.664
PbSOi* (Pb) 10.244
Ni(N03)2 (Ni) 1.556
ZnO (Zn) 14.003
Ethylbenzene 0.800
Xylene 2.050
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.150
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethene 0.150
Acetone - 1.700
Chlorobenzene (Not available for
bench-scale work)
Styrene 0.050
Anthracene 3.250
Pentachlorophenol 0.50
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1.25
The above quantities of chemicals were blended with each of the four
soil samples by the method determined earlier during bench-scale testing.
Once the mixing of the four samples was complete, each sample was split
into two 250-g samples for subsequent physical and chemical analysis. One
250-g sample of each contaminated soil was then sent to H. C. Nutting, in
Cincinnati, Ohio, for CEC analysis, while the other sample split was sent to
Bowser-Morner, in Dayton, Ohio, for X-ray defraction analysis. The results
of these analyses were ultimately compared to the results obtained earlier on
similar "clean" samples. Upon review of the results of these analyses, the
A-17
-------
EPA and extramural peer review committee was partial toward the montmoril-
lonite/kaolinite clay combination; however, there was some question about the
accuracy and precision of the numbers, and therefore it was decided that
additional CEC analyses should be run.
At this point, the overall approach for preparing the soil material was
modified as a result of a suggestion made by consultant, Ms. Muriel Waller.
Initially, all the soil samples were prepared on a weight percentage basis,
i.e., 25 percent sand was calculated based on the weight of the sand. The
new approach included the preparation of the soil matrix by volume percentage
instead of by weight. The suggestion to modify the approach for mixing the
clean soil was prompted by the visual inspection of the weight percentage
samples which contained a very large amount of clay because of the clay's
relatively low density. The change to volume percentages decreased the
amount of clay material present in the samples and produced a much more
•
realistic soil texture. Three additional clean soil samples were prepared by
volume percentages and were submitted (in triplicate) for CEC and grain size
analysis.
The clean soil matrix recipe that was finally agreed upon by the project
peer review committee following review of the additional analytical results
is presented in Table A-6 in terms of both volume and weight percentages.
TABLE A-6. FINAL CLEAN SOIL MATRIX RECIPE
Soil
component
Sand
Gravel
Silt
Topsoil
Clay
- Montmorillonite
- Kaolinite
Volume %
20.0
5.0
25.0
20.0
30.0
(7.5)
(22.5)
Equivalent wt. %
31.4
5.7
28.3
19.8
14.8
(5.4)
(9.4)
A-18
-------
Phase 4 - Determination of Full-Scale Blending
The primary objective of Phase 4 was to determine the actual quantity of
each chemical that would be required to achieve the following four SARM
concentrations under full-scale conditions:
1. High levels of organics (20,000 ppm volatiles plus 10,000 ppm
semivolatiles) and low levels of metals (1,000 ppm total metals).
2. Low levels of organics (2,000 ppm volatiles plus 1,000 ppm semi-
volatiles) and low levels of metals (1,000 ppm total metals).
3. Low levels of organics (2,000 ppm volatiles plus 1,000 ppm semi-
volatiles) and high levels of metals (50,000 ppm total metals).
4. High levels of organics (20,000 ppm volatiles plus 10,000 ppm
semivolatiles) and high levels of metals (50,000 ppm total metals).
The target concentrations for individual chemicals can be found in Table 2-1
of the main text.
The objectives of this task were met by preparing a series of spiked
soil samples using varying concentrations of the designated chemicals. Two
separate series of samples were prepared under this phase of the bench-scale
study. The first series consisted of six samples; three high organics/high
metals samples and three low organics/low metals samples. This first series,
however, was prepared before the decision had been made to modify the ap-
proach for preparing the clean soil (volume percentage vs. weight percent-
age). As a result, it was thought best to discard the first series and
re-spike new samples consisting of the selected soil matrix.
The second series consisted of nine soil samples, all spiked to high
organics/high metals levels; three at 100 percent, three at 120 percent, and
three at 140 percent of the theoretical target concentration levels. Samples
were prepared by the previously determined methods and submitted for analysis
in triplicate to increase understanding of 1) analyte recoveries, and 2) the
precision and accuracy of the laboratory results.
A-19
-------
These samples were prepared by spiking three 750-g batches of soil at
100 percent, 120 percent, and 140 percent, respectively. .Table A-7 presents
the individual chemical quantities that were added to each 750-g batch of
soil. Each batch was divided into three 250-g samples for analysis. Analy-
ses were conducted at the Western Research Institute (WRI) laboratory in
Laramie, Wyoming; results are shown in Table A-8. From the results of these
analyses, the doses of chemicals required to formulate each of the four SARMs
on the full-scale level were determined. The selected doses are presented in
Table A-9. A more detailed discussion of the analytical results from this
soil-spiking experiment can be found later in this Subsection.
TABLE A-7. SARM CHEMICAL QUANTITIES FOR DETERMINATION OF
FULL-SCALE BLENDING PROCEDURES (grams)
Chemical
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Styrene
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl )phthalate
Pentachlorophenol
Pb (as Pb SOJ
Zn (as ZnO)
Cd [as 3Cd(SOiJ-8H20]
As (as As203)
Cu (as CuSOj
Ni [as Ni(NO?)-6H20]
Cr (as Cr203j
SARM
Batch lb
1002
1.200
3.075
0.225
0.150
2.550
0.225
0.075
4.875
1.875
0.750
15.366
21.003
1.710
0.492
27.990
2.334
1.644
(4) (hi-hi
i
Batch 2D
120%
1.44
3.69
0.270
0.180
3.060
0.270
0.090
5.850
2.250
0.900
18.439
25.204
2.052
0.590
33.588
2.801
1.973
levels)3
L
Batch 3D
140%
1.68
4.305
0.315
0.210
3.570
0.315
0.105
6.825
2.625
1.050
21.512
29.442
2.394
0.689
39.186
3.268
2.302
Target
concentra-
tion (ppm)
(3 100% dose
3,200
8,200
600
400
6,800
600
200
6,500
2,500
1,000
14,000
22,500
1,000
500
9,500
1,000
1,500
Hi-hi = 20,000 ppm volatile organics, 10,000 ppm semivolatile organics, and
50,000 ppm inorganics; percentage refers to the percentage of contaminants
to their predesignated proportions, that were added to the soil to theoret-
ically meet the desired contaminant levels.
Quantities based on 750-g batches.
A-20
-------
TABLE A-8. SPIKED SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS (ppjn)
ro
Sample identification and dosage batches
100% dosage
Contaminant
Volatiles
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
Tetrachloro-
ethylene
Chlorobenzene
Acetone
1,2-dichloro-
ethane
Styrene
Semfvolatiles
Anthracene
Bis (2-ethyl-
hexyl) phthal-
ate
Pentachloro-
phenol
Metals
Lead
Zinc
Cadmium
Arsenic
Copper
Nickel
Chromium
B-l
2,300
3,500
240
200
2,700
180
<63
5,800
610
320
13,700
18,100
880
393
9,870
524
7
B-2
2,100
3.200
210
180
2,500
130
<63
3,800
1,600
560
11,100
16,300
598
270
5,920
367
6.6
B-3
2,800
4,400
290
240
2,000
170
<100
6,000
1,500
550
10,800
15,500
543
274
5,220
336
6.8
120% dosage
B-4
4,100
6,300
420
360
2,300
280
<100
5,500
1,100
470
14,400
21,500
863
232
9,010
549
5.5
B-5
3,300
5,100
330
290
2,300
190
<100
4,600
1.600
630
15,200
22,100
1,760
446
9,250
550
6.9
B-6
2,100
3,300
200
180
1,900
120
<100
4,500
1,800
790
15,400
22,400
862
420
8,790
537
7.4
B-7
4,500
6,900
490
400
3,500
350
<120
4,400
2,300
790
15,200
23,600
852
466
8,200
516
7.2
140% dosage
B-8
6,300
9,700
690
560
3,800
470
<170
4,400
2,500
730
14,700
22,900
779
428
7,720
483
13.6
B-9
4,500
6,900
460
400
3.700
340
<170
4,600
2,800
790
21,500
24,500
871
428
8,420
521
7.9
Hi-Hi
target
levels
(100%)
3,200
8,200
600
400
6,800
600
200
6,500
2,500
1.000
14,000
22.500 '
1,000
500
9,500
1,000
1,500
-------
TABLE A-9. FULL-SCALE CHEMICAL DOSES
Dose %
Chemical . (of theoretical)
Ethyl benzene 120
Xylene 120
Tetrachloroethylene 140
Chlorobenzene 140
Acetone 175
1,2-cfichloroethane 167
Styrene 500
Anthracene 100
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140
Pentachlorophenol 100
Pb (as Pb SOJ 120
Zn (as ZnO) 120
Cd [as 3Cd(SOj'8H20] 130
As (as As203) 150
Cu (as CuSOj 140
Ni [as Ni(N03)-6H20] 120
Cr [as Cr(N03)3-9H20]a 100
a Changed form of Cr from Cr203 to Cr(N03), because Cr203 was
virtually insoluble during the analytical procedure and only
detectable at very low ppm levels (see Table A-13).
DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDKEEPING
All activities associated with the bench-scale study were documented and
detailed records were kept for all sample analyses performed. A logbook was
used to note times, procedures, pVoblems that occurred, and solutions or
changes made during the BOAT bench-scale effort. Individual files have been
maintained on the six outside laboratories that were performing soil analyses
over the course of the project. The project files contain laboratory-specific
telephone conversation notes, scheduled analyses, discussions of any problems
that arose, purchase order requisitions, and invoices.
A-22
-------
BENCH-SCALE STUDY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
During the bench-scale study, two basic sets of analytical data were
generated: 1) inherent soil characteristic data (used in determining what
the constituents of the clean soil matrix would be), and 2) chemical concen-
tration data (used to determine the quantity of each chemical needed to
achieve target contaminant levels). The following section presents the
analytical data generated over the course of the bench-scale study and high-
lights those data that significantly affected the outcome of this phase of
the BOAT SARM project.
Inherent Soil Characteristics
Over the course of the bench-scale study, six different laboratories
performed analyses on various mixed soils and soil components. Table A-10
identifies the type and number of analyses performed by each laboratory. A
total of 59 samples were analyzed for the purpose of identifying soil com-
ponents and determining the component proportions needed to formulate the
desired clean soil matrix. The three most critical soil parameters examined
during this effort were clay mineralogy, grain size distribution, and cation
exchange capacity. Tables A-ll, A-12, and A-13 present analytical results
for samples of individual soil components, mixed soils prepared by weight
percentages and mixed soils prepared by volume percentages, respectively.
The 3-V-D sample series presented in Table A-13 represents the selected clean
soil matrix composition and its inherent characteristics. The selection of
the final clean soil matrix was based oh review of all analytical results;
however, the deciding factors in the final examination were cation exchange
capacity, and the texture of the soil.
A-23
-------
TABLE A-10. BENCH-SCALE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analysis and number of samples
Laboratory
XRD CEC TOCC
Moisture Grain size Hit.
pH content distribution List
1. Soils and Materi-
als Engineers
(SME)
2. H.C. Nutting Co.
3. University of Cin- 4
cinnati
4. Bowser-Morner, 4
Inc.
5. Western Research
Institute (WRI)
6. U.S. EPA Center
Hill Facility
Total 8
4 4
20
20 4 4
16
5
21
TOC = Total organic content.
The "Hit List" analysis includes analysis for only those volatiles, semi-
volatiles, and metals that were applied to the samples.
A-24
-------
TABLE A-ll. BENCH-SCALE ANALYTICAL RESULTS -
INDIVIDUAL SOIL COMPONENT CHARACTERISTICS
Sample
ID
e
8-CH
8-RR
E
A
WC
10
10-CH
8
r
11
c
ll-CH
S
D
Sample
composition
mite
I Mite
mite
Illite
Illite
Illite
Ca-montmoril-
lonite
Ca-montmoril-
lonite
Ca-MontmorU-
lonlte
Ca-Montmoril-
lonite
Kaolinite
Kaolinite
Kaolinite
Silt
Kaolinite/mont-
morillonite
Analysis
performed
Grain size
Grain sire
Grain size
Na-CECc
XRDd
Grain size
Grain size
Grain size
XRO
Na-CEC
Grain sire
XRD
Grain size
Grain size
XRD
Parameters
Gravel Sand Silt Cl«y CEC
Laboratory I III meg/1000 g Mineralogy
SME 0 53 44 3
CH 0 58 25 17
SMS 2 58 31 9
HCN 0.8
UC 641 mite; 19S
mixed-layer; 17S
chlorite
SHE 8.8 32.8 50.4 8.0
SHE 0 11 65 24
SHE 0 12 43 45
UC lOOt Ca-Smectite
HCN 46.4
SME 0 0 30 70
UC 94X kaolinite; 61
illite
CH 0 0 10 9.0
SME 0 2.1 92.0 5.1
UC 52S kaolinite;
425 smectite;
6J illite
a SME * Soil and Materials Engineers; CH « U.S. EPA Center Hill Facility; HCN - H.C. Nutting Co.
of Cincinnati.
Grain size analysis based on weight percentages.
c CEC • cation exchange capacity; Na refers to it being a sodium-based AST* analysis.
d XRO » X-ray defraction analysis.
UC • University
A-25
-------
TABLE A-12. BENCH-SCALE ANALYTICAL RESULTS -
MIXED SOILS PREPARED BY WEIGHT PERCENTAGES
Sample Sample
ID composition
3 301 Illite. 301
silt. 201 sand,
51 gravel, 151
topsoil
5 301 montmoril-
lenite. 301 silt.
201 sand, 51
gravel, 151
topsoil
5-CH 301 montmorll-
lenite, 301 silt,
201 sand, 51
7 gravel, 151
ro topsoil
6 301 tcalonite. 301
silt, 201 sand,
101 gravel, 101
topsoil
7 301 kaolinite/
montmorillonlte,
301 silt, 201
sand, 101 gravel ,
101 topsoil
9 401 illlte, 201
silt, 251 sand,
51 gravel, 101
topsoil
9RR 401 illlte, 201
silt. 251 sand,
51 gravel , 101
topsoil
9-CH 401 Illite, 201
silt, 251 sand,
51 gravel, 101
topsoil
Parameters
Moisture
Analysis Gravel Sand Silt Clay CEC TOC content,
performed Laboratory I I I 1 meq/100 g Mineralogy mg/kg pH I
Grain size. pH, SME 0.6 36.0 52.4 11.0 3.03 7.5 10.4
TOC, moisture
content
Ca-CEC HCN 22.311 (Ca)
Na-CEC 17.337 (Na)
Grain size. pH, SME 0.6 32.2 51.2 16.0 3.63 8.0 12.6
TOC, moisture
Ca-CEC HCN 23.015
Grain size CH 0 31 42 27
Na-CEC HCN 14.945
Na-CEC HCN 37.065
Grain size SME 4 70 23 3
Grain size SME 1 56 35 8
Grain size CH 0 58 27 15
(continued)
-------
TABLE A-12 (continued)
I
ro
Sample Sample
ID composition
*
1-B , 40X nontBoHl-
spiked)" lonlte. 251 silt.
25t sand. 101
topsoil
2-8 401 kaolinlte.
(spiked) 25X silt. 251
sand. 101 top-
soil
3-B 401 kaolintte/
(spiked) Bontmorillanite,
25X silt. 2St
sand, IDS topsoil
4-B 401 itlite. 251
(spiked) 251 silt, 25J
sand. 10X top-
soil
Analysis
performed
Na-CEC
XRO
Na-CEC
XRO
Na-CEC
XRD
Na-CEC
XRO
Parameters
Moisture
Gravel Sand Silt Clay CEC TOC content.
Laboratory3 XIII roeq/100 g Mineralogy mg/kg pH I
HCN
BMB
HCN
BM
HCN
BH
HCN
BH
24.1
Clay unchanged
49.3
Clay unchanged
37.7
Clay unchanged
15.9
Clay unchanged
* Samples 1-B through 4-B were spiked with high organics/high metals concentrations of chemicals to determine effect of chemicals on CEC and
•Ineralogy by comparing with clean sample results; objective was to select clay for clean soil matrix.
b BM - Bauser-Hourner, Inc.. performed XRD on contaminated samples.
-------
TABLE A-13. BENCH-SCALE ANALYTICAL RESULTS -
MIXED SOIL PREPARED BY VOLUME PERCENTAGES
Sample
ID
Sample
composition
Analysis
performed
•ttrs
Labora- Gravel
tory X
Sand
X
sm
x
Clay
X
CEC TOC
(weg/lOOg) ng/kg
pH
1-V-O-l 0.5 part gravel, 2.5 pt. NA-CEC HCN 40.4
sand, 2.5 pt. silt, 3.0
pt. clay (50/50; m/k)
1.5 pt. topsoil
l-V-D-2 0.5 part gravel, 2.5 pt. Na-CEC HCN 29.6
sand, 2.5 pt. silt, 3.0
pt. clay (50/50; rn/k)
1.5 pt. topsoil
l-V-0-3 0.5 part gravel, 2.5 pt. Na-CEC HCN 32.6
sand, 2.5 pt. silt, 3.0
pt. clay (50/50; m/k)
1.5 pt. topsoil
l-V-D-4 0.5 part gravel, 2.5 pt. Grain size SHE 9 31 48 12
sand, 2.5 pt. silt, 3.0
pt. clay (50/50; m/k)
1.5 pt. topsoil
l-V-0-5 0.5 part gravel, 2.5 pt. Brain size SHE 6 52 32 10
sand, 2.5. pt. silt, 3.0
pt. clay (50/50; m/k)
1.5 pt. topsoil
2-V-D-l 0.5 pt. gravel, 1.0 pt. Na-CEC HCN 61.7
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
4.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
2.0 pt. topsoil
2-V-D-2 0.5 pt. gravel, 1.0 pt. Na-CEC HCN 60.4
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
4.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
2.0 pt. topsoil
2-V-D-3 0.5 pt. gravel. 1.0 pt. NA-CEC HCN 57.8
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
4.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
2.0 pt. topsoil
2-V-D-4 0.5 pt. gravel, 1.0 pt. Grain size SHE 10 39 37 14
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
4.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
2.0 pt. topsoil
2-V-D-5 0.5 pt. gravel, 1.0 pt. Grain size SME 8 40 36 16
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
4.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
2.0 pt. topsoil
3-V-D-l 0.5 pt. gravel, 2.0 pt. Na-CEC HCN 30.9
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
3.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
3-V-D-2 0.5 pt. gravel. 2.0 pt. Na-CEC HCN 30.0
sand. 2.5 pt. silt,
3.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
3-V-0-3 0.5 pt. gravel, 2.0 pt. Na-CEC HCN 34.5
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
3.0 pt. clay (25/75; n/k)
3-V-D-4 0.5 pt. gravel, 2.0 pt. Grain size SME 7 48 33 12
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
3.0 pt. clay (25/75; m/k)
3-V-D-5 0.5 pt. gravel, 2.0 pt. Grain size SME 6 48 33 13
sand, 2.5 pt. silt,
3.0 pt. clay (25/75; n/k)
2.7 8.0
3.4 8.2
HCN
SME
• H.C. Nutting Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.
• Soil and Materials Engineers Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.
A-28
-------
Spiked Soil Contaminant Levels
Nine soil samples were spiked at three different dosage levels and
analyzed for the purpose of determining-the quantities of each chemical that
would be needed to meet the target contaminant concentration levels under
full-scale conditions. The specific chemical dosage added to each of the
three batches were previously presented in Table A-7, and the analytical
results from analysis of the nine samples (B-l through B-9) were presented in
Table A-8. Samples B-l, B-2, and B-3 are triplicate samples prepared at 100
percent of the calculated dosage needed to theoretically achieve the desired
target levels for each contaminant (see far right column for targets).
Samples B-4, B-5, and 8-6 were prepared at 120 percent of the theoretical
i
dose, and samples B-7, B-8, and B-9 at 140 percent of the theoretical dosage.
Based on the analytical results, the full-scale dosing procedures were devel-
oped and adjusted.
The data indicated that almost all the organics needed to be overdosed
20 to 40 percent above the theoretical dosage to achieve the desired residual
target levels. Acetone needed to be dosed at roughly 175 percent of theoret-
ical, and 1,2-dichloroethane at 167 percent of the theoretical to achieve the
desired levels.
Most of the residual metal concentrations were close to target at 120 to
140 percent of theoretical dosage, with two exceptions. Nickel residuals
measured only 40 to 50 percent of the desired level, regardless of dosage,
and chromium was only detectable at very low ppm levels. This poor result
for chromium was believed to be due to the form in which Cr was added (i.e.,
as Cr20- anhydrous, and insoluble in the acid digestion procedure used in
A-29
-------
sample preparation). To correct this situation, a more soluble Cr salt
Cr(N03),«9H20 was purchased for full-scale spiking. No cause for the low
nickel residual was determined.
The data also indicated that the styrene target level needed to be
increased from 200 ppm to 1000 ppm at the high level and 20 to 100 ppm at the
low level. This was necessary to make the styrene detectable during analy-
sis. (WRI advised that the sample dilution necessary for analysis of the
high levels of xylene made the styrene undetectable during analysis.
A-30
-------
APPENDIX B
STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF SARM HOMOGENEITY
B-l
-------
PEI ASSOCIATES, INC.
MEMORANDUM
Pat Esposito DATE' August 6, 1987
CMOIC/-T Statistical Analysis of Soil Mixing .»~4, Charles E. Zimmer
SUBJECT: Time Results FROM:
FILE: 3741-7'1
Quantities of zinc, copper and total organic compounds were added to 500
pounds of soil, and mechanically mixed for six minutes, after which six
samples were drawn at random for subsequent analysis. After 12 minutes and
again after 18 minutes six samples were drawn at random. Concentrations of
zinc, copper and total organic compounds, as determined by the PEI Analytical
Laboratory, are presented in Table 1.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
The data in Table 1 were analyzed by Analysis of Variance to determine
whether or not mixing time had an effect upon the average concentration of
any compounds. Further, Bartlett's Test was used to determine whether or not
the variability within sets of six samples was homogenous over the three
mixing times. See Attachment 1 for an explanation of these statistical
procedures.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
Results of the Analysis of Variance and Bartlett's Test of Variance are
presented in Table 2 and 3. Based upon Analysis of Variance, the difference
between mean concentrations of zinc and copper for mixing times of 6, 12 and
18 minutes is not statistically significant. The overall mean concentrations
for the batch of soil are 16,068 mg/kg for zinc and 9,163 mg/kg for copper.
For total organic compounds ANOVA shows that the difference between means for
the three mixing times is statistically significant.
B-2
-------
TABLE 1. SOIL MIXING TIME RESULTS
Zinc, mg/kg
Mixing time - min.
6 12 18
16,083
12,766
11,876
17,463
16,555
10,725
?* Mean 14,245
CO
Standard deviation 2,802
Coefficient of 0.197a
variation
Overall mean
Standard deviation
Coefficient of
variation
15,801
18,481
14,373
17,150
15,738
11,974
15,586
2,254
0.145
15,068
2,254
0.150
18,262
14,010
16,956
12,896
15,842
16,276
15,374
1,570
0.102
Copper, mg/kg
Mixing time - min.
6 12 18
9,589
8,412
6,923
9,974
10,707
7,100
8,784
1,562
0.178
9,799
11,191
9,326
10,105
10,001
7,113
9,589
1,360
0.142
9,163
1,317
0.144
9,744
8,238
9,678
7,583
9,694
9,752
9,115
956
0.105
Total organic compounds, ug/g
Mixing time - min.
6 12 18
2,490
3,010
1,350
3,540
2,080
5,470
2,990
1,430
0.478
13,300
2,410
3,960
9,540
6,160
3,690
6,511
4,163
0.639
5,907
3,330
0.564
9,390
9,930
7,260
14,000
3,590
5,160
8,221
3,727
0.453
•
3 Coefficient of variation (CV) = standard deviation * mean.
b As purgeable organic carbon (POC). POC of uncontaminated (clean) soil was 10.7 yg/g.
NOTE: Metal analyses were done by EPA-Cincinnati and reported verbally to P. Esposito, Project Manager; POC
by PEI Laboratory (lab report attached).
-------
TABLE 2. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
Source of variation
Between mixing times
Between replicates
within mixing time
Total
Between mixing times
Between replicates
within mixing time
Total
»
Between mixing times
Between replicates
within mixing time
Total
Degrees of
freedom
2
15
17
2
15
17
2
15
17
Sum of
squares Mean square F-ratio*
Zinc
6,238,837 3,199,418 0.608 N.S.
79,999,109 5,133,274
83,237,946
Copper
1,964,716 982,358 0.566 N.S.
26,015,636 1,734,375
27,980,352
TOC
85,363,969 42,681,984 3.84 Sig. Diff
166,322,042 11,088,136
251,686,011
Critical value F = 2.70 (a = 0.10 risk level)
B-4
-------
TABLE 3. BARTLETTS TEST OF VARIANCE
Mixing
time
(min. )
6
12
18
Pooled
Chi-square*
X2
Standard deviation
Zinc
2,802
2,254
1,570
2,266
1.78
Copper
1,562
1,360
956
1,317
1.31
Total organic
compounds
1,430
4,163
3,727
3,330
5.68**
**
Critical x2 = 4.61 (o = 0.10 risk level).
Standard deviations for various mixing times are
significantly different.
B-5
-------
Referring again to Table 1, it appears that the TOC concentration in-
creases with increased mixing time. Further, the variability between repli-
cate samples, as shown by the standard deviation ranges from 1,430 to 3,727
yg/g. Note that for a 12 minute mixing time the TOC concentration varied
from 2,410 to 13,300 yg/g and for 18 minutes the variation was from 3,590 to
14,000 yg/g. In discussing these large variabilities with laboratory per-
sonnel, it was stated that the analytical method used to determine the con-
centration of TOC is one that was developed for the analysis of water sam-
ples. In the application of this procedure to this study, the soil samples
were mixed with water to form a slurry. The preparation and analysis of the
slurry may have affected the reproducibility of the analytical method.
The results of Bartlett's Test of Variance showed that for zinc and
copper, the difference between standard deviations for the three mixing times
was not statistically significant. Referring again to Table 1, it is ap-
parent that there is a definite tendency for the standard deviation to de-
crease with increased mixing time. On the other hand no such tendency is
demonstrated for the TOC results.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the results of this statistical analysis, it is my recom-
mendation that a mixing time of at least 12 minutes be used in the prepara-
tion of additional batches of soil for the further studies to be performed
under this project. Because of the rather large variability (i.e., standard
deviation) of an individual replicate for TOC, I would urge that further
consideration be given to the selection of an alternate analytical method.
The overall coefficient of variation for the TOC measurements of 0.564 is
more than three times that of zinc and copper.
It is my understanding that because of time constraints a mixing time of
12 minutes was used to prepare the quantity of soil required for the field
testing program. Based upon the results of this study the average concentra-
tion and 95 percent confidence interval estimate for the average concentra-
tion for six replicates would be:
95% confidence
Average interval for average
Zn 15,068 12,694-17,426
Cu 9,163 7,781-10,545
B-6
-------
ATTACHMENT 1
STATISTICAL PROCEDURES
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
In situations involving the comparison of two samples the Students "t"
test is used. The extension of this procedure to situations which involve
the comparison of more than two samples is referred to as the Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA).3 As with the Student "t" test, ANOVA is used to test the
Null Hypothesis that the means of the several samples are identical (i.e. y,
= y2 = y~). The test used with ANOVA is called the F-test. As with the
Students "t" test if the F value calculated from the data exceeds the value
of F for the specified degrees of freedom and risk level (a), the Null
Hypothesis is rejected. If the calculated value of F is less than the value
from the F distribution it is concluded that the observed difference between
the sample means is not statistically significant.
Example:
Zn
mg/kg
Mixing time - minutes
6 12 18 Total
16,083 16,801 16,262
12,766 18,481 14,010
11,876 14,373 16,956
17,463 17,150 12,896
16,555 15,738 15,842
10,725 11,974 16,276
Sum x 85,468 93,517 92,242 271,227
Sum x2 1,256,723,040 1,482,985,911 1,430,422,636 4,170,131,587
3 Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran "Statistical Methods," The Iowa State
University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1967, Chapter 10.
B-7
-------
= 4,170,131,587 -
= = 83,237,946
SSBET = i [(85,468)2 + (93,517)2 + (92,242)2]
= 6,238,837
ANOVA
Degrees of Sum of
Source of variation freedom squares
Mean square
F-ratio*
Between mixing times 2
Between replicates 15
within mixing time
Total 17
6,238,837 3,199,418
79,237,946 5,133,274
83,237,946
0.608
The critical value of F taken from Table A, 14, Part 1 (Snedecor and Cochran)
for a risk level, a = 0.10, is
01Q
= 2.70. Because the calculated value
of F = 0.608 is less than 2.70, there is no reason to reject the Null
Hypothesis and thus it is concluded that the observed difference between the
means of the three samples of 14.245, 15,586 and 15,374 is not statistically
significant. Therefore the best estimate of the mean concentration in the
batch of soil is the average of the three or 15,068 mg/kg.
BARTLETT'S TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
Whereas ANOVA is used to determine whether or not the difference between
the means of several samples is statistically significant, Bartlett's Test
is used to determine whether or not the variability within samples is homo-
genous over several samples
Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran "Statistical Methods" The Iowa State
University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1967, pp. 296-298.
B-8
-------
Example
Zn
mg/kg
Mixing time
(min. )
6
12
18
Sum
Mean (S2)
Standard deviation
Si
2,802
2,254
1,570
Variance
V
7,851,204
5,080,516
2,464,900
15,396,620
5,132,207
Log S.z
6.89494
6.70591
6.39190
19.99265
M = 2.3026 f (a log S7 - Sum log S.2)
where
f = 6 the number of samples for each mixing time
a = 3 the number of mixing times
M = 2.3026(6) [3 log 5,132,207 - 19.99265]
X' =
313](6)
1.074
M
1.91001
1.074
= 1.78
Because the calculated value of Chi squared (x2) is less than the value of x2
for a - 1 - 2 degrees of freedom and risk level a = 0.05 (i.e., x22 n in =
4.61 - Table A5 Snedecor and Cochran) there is not sufficient reason to
reject the Null Hypothesis that the variance is constant over the three
mixing times. It should be noted that even through Bartlett's test did not
reject the Null Hypothesis, there is strong evidence that the variability
within samples tends to decrease as the mixing time is increased.
B-9
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Rd.
Cincinnati, OH 45246
(513) 782-4700
Client: USEPA
Attn:
Project No.i
Requisition No.
Date Received:
Sampled by:
Date Reported:
3741-7-1
T7-07-156
7/15/87
PEI
8/4/87
Sample ID
Uncon Soi1
PEI No.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
Moisture, '/.
3.63
22.6
POC, ug/g
10.7
2490
3010
1350
3540
2080
5470
13,300
2410
3960
9540
6160
3690
9390
9930
7260
14,OOO
3590
5160
7OC -
mitted by:
CadVice Bearden
Inorganic Laboratory
Supervi sor
B-10
-------
APPENDIX C
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL
ANALYSES OF CLEAN SARM
C-l
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
CLIENT:
U5EPA SARM
CONTACT: DOUG BAILEY
SAMPLE ID: SOIL SAMPLE 1 ?. 2
CAS Number
Uq/Kci
PN NO: 3741-7
RED NO.: T7-07-408
DATE RECD.: 7/30/87
Average of two analyses
FEI NO: -01
CAS Number
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
75-09-2
67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-35-3
156-60-5
76-93-3
107-06-2
78-93-3
71-55-6
e- £ -• n n-
.Jt»~.i-»j — ,J
108-05-4
75-27-4
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Ac et one
Carbon Disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene-
Chloroform
1,2-dichloroethane
2-butanone
1,1,1-trichloroethane
Carbon Tetr ach1 oride
Vinyl Acetate
Br omodic h1 or omet hane
UqA a
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
4 JB
10 U
5 U
5 U
5 U
5 U
5 U
5 U
10 U
3 JB
5 U
10 U
5 U
78-87-5
1 , 2-dichloropropane
1006 l-02-6Tr ans-1, 3-di chl or opr open*
79-01-6
124-48-1
79-00-5
71-43-2
Tr i c h 1 or oet hene
Di br ornoc h 1 or omet nan e
1,1, 2-t r i c h 1 or oet hane
Benzene
1 006 1 -0 1 -5Ci s- 1 , 3-d i c h 1 or opr opene —
110-75-8
75-25-2
108-10-1
591-78-6
127-18-4
79-34-5
108-33-3
108-90-"
100-41-4
100-42-5
2-ch 1 or oet hyl vinyl ether —
Bromoforni
4-methyl-2-pentanone
2-hexanone
Tet r ac h 1 or oet hene
1,1,2, 2-tetrachl or oethane
Tol uene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
Total Xylenes
cr
cr
cr
c-
vj
e;
5
cr
10
tr
10
4
^
n
c-
5
cr
er
Data Reporting Qualifiers
Value The result is a value
greater than or equal to
the detection limit.
Indicates compound was analyzed
for but not detected.
The value reported is the
fiiinirnurn detection limit for the
sample.
B This flag is used wheneve'- the
analyte is found in the tlai-it a;
well as a sample.
Indicates an estimated value. This
flag is used when the mass spectral
data indicates the presence
of s compound that meets the identification
criteria, but the result is less than the
specified detection limit.
C-2
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS
CLIENT: U5EPA
SAPM
PROJECT: 3741-7
RED NO: T7-07-408
DATE RECD7/30/87
ATTN:
DOUG BAILEY
SAMPLE ID: SOIL SAMPLE 1 !< 2
PEI NO.: -01
CAS Number
-1
-=;
103-95-2 Phenol
111-44-4 bi s ('2-ch 1 or oethyl't ether
95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-47-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6 Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7 2-Methylphenol
3963S-32-9b i s (2-ch 1 or 01 sopr opy 1') et her
106-44-5 4-Methylphenol
621-64-7 N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine-
67-72-1 Hexachloroethane
)S-95-3 Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
-9 2,4-Dimethyl phenol
-0 Benzoic Acid
-1 b i s ( 2-ch1 or et hoxy)met hane—
2,4-Dichlorophenol
-1 1,2,4-Trichlorooenzene
Napthalene
-8 4-Chloroani1i ne
-3 hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chl or o-3-rnethyl phenol
2-Methylnapthalene
-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene—
-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
-7 2-Chloronapthalene
-4 2-Nitroaniline
-3 Dimethyl Phthalate
B Acenapthylene
-2 3-Ni t r oan111ne
88-75
105-67
65-85
111-91
120-83-2
120-82
91-20
106-47
87-63
59-50
91-57
77-47
88-06
95-95
91-58
88-74
131-11
208-96
99-09
-7
-6
Ug/Kg CAS Number LJg • f g
660 U 83-32-9 Acenapthene 66 i
660 U 51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol 660
660 U 100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol 660
660 U 132-64-9 Di benz o fur an 660
660 U 121-14-2 2,4-Ditutrotoluene 660
660 LJ 606-20-2 2,6-Dinitrotoluene £6'.'
660 U 84-66-2 Di ethyl Fhthalate 660
660 U 7005-72-34Chlorophenylphenyl ether— 660
660 U 86-73-7 Fluor ene 660
660 U 100-01-6 4-Nitroaniline 660
660 U 534-52-1 4,6-Dinitro2methylphenol 660
660 U 534-52-1 N-Nitrcsodiphenylannne
660 U 101-55-3 4bromophenylphenylether
660 U 118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene
660 U 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol
660 U 85-01-8 Phenanthrene £t."
3300 U 120-12-7 Anthracene £60
660 U 84-74-2 Di-n-butyl phthalate 420
660 U 206-44-0 Fluoranthene £60
£60 U 129-00-0 Pyr ene 6tO
660 U 85-68-7 Butylbenzylphthalate 660
660 U 91-94-1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidme 1300
660 U 56-55-3 BenzoCa)anthracene 660
660 LJ 117-81-7 bis-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 660
660 U 218-01-9 Chrysene 660
660 U 117-84-0 Di-n-octyl phthalate 66.":
660 U 205-99-2 Benso(b)fluoranthene 660
3300 U 207-08-9 Benzotk)fluoranthene 6EO
660 U 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 660
3300 U 193-39-5 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 660
660 U 53-70-3 Di benz o (a, h') anthracene 650
660 U 191-24-2 BenzoCg, h, i) perylene 661'
3300 U
(1.) Cannot be separated from diphen>lamine
C-3
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
CLIENT:
CONTACT:
SAMPLE IT:
CAS Numbtr
•? < Q c • e
,_ » 3 t'-r C
'i < -D D^ "7
•?< a oc o
W 4. -, CD w
58-89-3
76-44-3
309-00-2
1 A "' J. ^ — "?
959-98-8
£ f"l R7 "
~*2-55-G
"7 '• •"• ('^ D
102 1-07-8
IT'" _ ~'d__Tv
T -, _ ^ T _ cr
C'-' "7 * Q
Q -. ••• < ^-, cr — . --i
11 •" ~ "7 4. — ^ 1 _ '•
::§:2S-£
USEPA
SARM
Doug Baile>
SOIL SAMPLE 1 ?' 2
. r
DtLct tfrlL ~ —
neptct.niijr
A 1 d r z ^ i
Ht?pt S'-hi ur Epi-O'-idt: —
EnduSLil fsn I —
Ditidrin — — —
•" A • riir_
"^ , H L'l-'t —
Enclrin - —
— „ -i . ' f - t. T T
^.ri'_.i. - _U i csf i i ..
-* •« • nn1"
H , •- L'Ui.1
EfiQ'.-Eui f fih Sul f fitt" —
l"' V- T i- v H = I-T ^
•;";;;":!?:?::::::::::::
'--''"-" ±'-i-
Ar-o;h l,;,r -1254
A-ccr,: :r-l2£,0
Ug/Kg
8
8
8
8
8
8
D
8
1£
16
16
16
1£
16
80
80
15
8-:
80
80
8C
160
150
U
U
U
U
L)
U
ij
U
U
1 i
U
L)
U
U
IJ
1 {
IJ
U
U
U
M
U
1 1
IJ
U
FN NO: 3741-7
RED NO: T7-07-408
DATE RECD:7/30/B7
SAMPLER: PEI
PEI NO:
-01
C-4
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
CLIENT: USERA SAFfl
CONTACT: DOUG BAILEY
PN NO: 3741-7
REQ NO. : T7-07-40S
DATE RECD.: 7/30/87
SAMPLE ID:
CAS Number
7 J Q"7 *">
/*+ O/ w
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
75-03-2
67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-35-3
156-60-5
"7B OO O
/O 3O O
1 7-06-2
,-33-3
71-55-6
c;C •"''3_c;
JO jlJ J
108-05-4
T=- -'7-J.
Lhl ur ufnethane —
Br urnumet hane — — — —
v i n y i L h 1 ur i d e — —
Lhl uruet hane — — — —
Methyi ene Lhluride —
Ai_et'-'ne — — — — —
Lai1 bun Di sul fi de— ——————— —
1,1 Di chl oruet hene — ~—
1,1 Dichl or uethane
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethene-
L-h lor u f ur rii~— — — ————————
1 , *. di chl or oet hane ~— —
i.— dut anune— '— — —
1,1, 1-tr i chl or oet hane
Vinyl Acetate— —
Ug/Kg
10
10
10
10
4
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
c-
uj
10
er
u
u
u
u
J
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
1 1
PEI NO: METHOD BLANK'
CAS Number
Ug/Kg
78-37-5 1,2-dichloropropane
10061-02-6Tr ans-1,3-dic h1 or opr opene
79-01-6 Tric h1 or oet hene
124-48-1 Di br omoc h 1 or omet hane
73-00-5 1, 1,2-tnchloroethane
71-43-2 Benzene
10061-01-5Ci s-1,3-d i ch1 or opr opene—
110-75-B 2-chloroethylvinyl ether —
75-25-2 Bromoform
108-10-1 4-nvethyl -2-pentanone
531-78-6 2-hexanone
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene
73-34-5 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
108-88-3 Toluene
108-30-7 Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 Ethyl benzene
100-42-5 St yr ene
Total Xylenes
5 L
10 L
Data Reporting Qualifiers
Value The result is a value
greater than or equal to
the detection limit.
Indicates compound was analyzed
for but not detected.
The value reported is the
minimum detection limit for the
sample.
This flag is used whenever t.Lie
analyte is found-in the blent as
well as a sample.
Indicates an estimated value. This
flag is used wnen the mass spectral
data indicates the presence
of a compound that meets tne identification
criteria, but the result is less than the
specified detection limit.
C-5
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS
CLIENT: USEPA
SARM
ATTN:
DOUG BAILEY
PROJECT: 3741-7
REP NO: T7-07-408
DATE RECD7/30/B7
SAMPLE ID:
CAS Number
PEI NO.: METHOD BLANK
Ug/Kg CAS Number
Ug/Kg
108-95
111-44
95-57
541-73-
106-47-
100-51
95-50
95-48
39638-3
106-44
621-64
67-72
93-95
78-59
88-75
105-67
65-85
111-91
120-83
120-82
91-20
106-47
87-68
59-50
2 Phenol ---------------------
4 bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ----
8 2-Chlorophenol -------------
1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene --------
7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene --------
6 Benzyl Alcohol -------------
1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene --------
7 2-Methyl phenol -------------
-9bis(2-chloroisopropyl )ether
5 4-Methyl phenol -------------
7 N-mtroso-di-n-propylamine-
1 Hexachloroethane -----------
3 Nitrobenzene ---------------
1 Isophorone -----------------
5 2-Nitrophenol --------------
-9 2, 4-Di methyl phenol ---------
0 Benzoic Acid ---------------
1 bis<2-chlorethoxy)niethane —
2 2,4-Dichlorophenol ---------
1 1 , 2, 4-Tr ichlorobenzene -----
3 Napthalene ----------------
8 4-Chloroanilme ------------
3 Hexachlorobutadiene --------
7 4-C hi or o-3-methyl phenol ----
91-57-6 2-Methylnapthalene ---------
77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene —
83-06-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ------
95-95-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ------
91-53-7 2-Chloronapthalene ---------
38-74-4 2-Nitroanilme -------------
131-11-3 Dimethyl Phthalate ---------
208-96-B Acenapthylene ------------
99-09-2 3-Nitroanilme -------------
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
3300
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
660
3300
660
3300
660
660
3300
U 83-32-9 Acenapthene 660
U 51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol 660
U 100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol 660
U 132-64-9 Dibenzofuran 660
U 121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 660
U 606-20-2 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 660
U 84-66-2 Diethyl Phthalate 660
U 7005-72-34Chlorophenylphenyl ether— 660
U 86-73-7 Fluor ene 660
U 100-01-6 4-Nitroaniline 660
U 534-52-1 4,6-Dinitro2niethylphenoi
U 534-52-1 N-Nitro5odiphenylarnine
U 101-55-3 4bromophenylphenylether 66^
U 118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 660
U 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 660
U 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 660
U 120-12-7 Anthracene 660
U 84-74-2 Di-n-butyl phthalate 150
U 206-44-0 Fluoranthene 660
U 129-00-0 Pyrene 6BO
U 85-68-7 Butylbenzylphthalate 660
U 91-94-1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1300
U 56-55-3 Benzo(a)anthracene 660
U 117-81-7 bis-C2-ethylhexyi:>phthalate 660
U 218-01-9 Chrysene 660
U 117-84-0 Di-n-octyl phthalate 66'.:
U 205-99-2 BenzoCbMluoranthene 66;:
U 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 660
U 50-32-8 Benzota)pyrene 66fl
U 193-39-5 IndenoCl,2,3-cd.>p>rene 66:
U 53-70-3 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 660
U 191-24-2 Benzo(g,h, i.) per yl ene 660
U
(1) Cannot be separated from diphen> laruine
C-6
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
CLIENT: L'SEFA
SAPM
CQNTAC": Doug Briiey
PN NO: 3741-7
PEQ NO: T7-07-408
DATE PECD:7/30''87
SAMPLER: PEI
SAMPLE ID:
CAS Narf,b*r
PEI NO: METHOD BLANf
319-84-5 Aipl-,a-BHC 3 '_'
319-85-7 B~t?,-BHC 8 L>
319-8&-S Delta-BHC 3 U
58-89-9 Gariirna-BHC ''Lindar,e! 8 '_'
76-44-8 Ht^tscnlor S U
309-00-2 Alirin 3 L1
1024-57-3 Ht-ptschlor 3?c ide S LJ
Q =; Q __ Q p _ c* ET j --!-{= n1 f H ^ T ^ ' '
£0-57-1 Di*lti'-in 16 U
"2-55-9 4,4'--D:E IS _
-2-20-S E-idrin 12 L'
'->'•?-i-i'-i'-cr_ 1-1 r-._i__ --r-^ TT ir'i
^ ;- i u DW. ?£.rt'JL EwU e> i * j. ib j
-54-3 4,4'-m 1£ U
T[.>31-07-8 Er'-d:^ulf3M S'jl'st* 16 L1
50-29-3 4,4'-DCT 1£ LJ
^2-43-5 Meth:.-,,c^lc,- SO L1
53-i9--70-5Endnn !- eton* 1£ 'j
30; 1-35-2 To^phene 16 U
12£--i-ll-2Aro.:hic^-101£ SO U
lll04-23-2A<-o,:hlor-1221 80 L1
534£9-21-E'Ar-:ch::.r-l242 30 'J
11097-£'?-iA,'o.:'-,lor-i;54 1£0 '_'
11096-S2-5Ar-ochlL-r--12£0 160 'J
C-7
-------
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Rd.
Cincinnati, OH 45246
(513) 782-4700
Client: USEPA
Attn:
Project No.:
Requisition No.s
Date Received:
Sampled by:
Date Reported:
3741-7
T7-07-408
7/30/87
PEI
8/19/87
Sample ID:
PEI No.:
Soil for SARM
07-408-01
Al1 results ug/g
Cyanide <0.5
Aluminum 13,000
Antimony <11
Arsenic 9.4
Bari um 52.3
Beryllium 1.4
Cadmium 2
Calr.ium 131,000
Chromium 8
Cobalt . 3.6
Coppnr 8.5
Iron 10,3OO
Lead 9. 1
Magnesium 25,6OO
Manganese , 670
hercury <0.2
Nickel 7.8
Potassium 1220
Selenium <0.2
Silver 1.6
Sodium 198
Thai 1ium < 14
Vanadium 15.6
Zinc 33
Submitted by:
ipnce Bear den
Inorganic Laboratory
Sup€?rvi sor
C-8
-------
August 17, 1987
BILLING
COPY.
THE H. C. NUTTING COMPANY
GEOTECMNICAL AND TESTING ENGINEERS
41 20 AIRPORT ROAD
912 MORRIS STREET
BOX NUMBER 11 •
W.O. No.
P.O. No.
'wStvew
PE-87-1886-3741-7-1
P O BOX C • CINCINNATI, OHIO 45226
CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA 28301
HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, KENTUCKY 41076
SINCE 1921
513-321-5616
304-344-0621
806-261-2043
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio - 45246
Attn: Mr. Douglas C. Bailey
Dear Sir:
Re: Cation Exchange Analysis
Transmitted herewith is our report covering the results of the
Cation Exchange analysis performed upon ten (10) samples of soil
which were prepared and submitted to our laboratory. •
The analysis was performed in accordance with your letter of
July 30, 1987. The results of the analysis are summarized as
follows:
SAMPLE NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY - 30
117.5
152.5
150.0
150.0
77.5
150.0
155.0
80.0
147.5
147.5
REMARKS :
The cation exchange values were determined in accordance with the
procedures outlined in Enviromental Protection Agency's Technical
Publication Manual No. EPA-00600-2-78-054, dated March 19, 1978.
Respectfully Submitted,
THE H. C. NUTTING COMPANY
Robert House,
Laboratory Director
RH/sJc
C-9
-------
S&ME
Formerly, Soil & Material Engineers. Inc
August 8, 1987
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
Attn: Mr. Douglas Bailey
Re: Soil Testing
SfcME Project No. 1223-87-216
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Please find attached a lab summary sheet and grain size
distribution curves for the six samples you sent to us for
analysis.
If you have any questions regarding this work, please contact
this office at (513) 874-4111.
Respectfully submitted,
S&ME, INC.
William D. Hunt
Laboratory Manager
WDH:nr
Attachments
S&ME, Inc.
225 Corporate Court, Suite K
Foirfieid,OH45014 C-10
-------
CLIENT: PEL Inc.
PROJECT: Soil Testing
PROJECT NO: 1223-87-216
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Boring Sample Organic Grain Size Analysis
No. No. Content Gravel Sand Silt Clay
-LOI- % % % %
PH
PC#
6
3
5
2.7
3.0
2.8
3
4
2
57
58
56
27
27
28
13
11
14
8.0
8.5
9.0
PCf 2
1
2
4
3.2
3.9
3.8
3
2
3
55
57
54
29
30
30
13
11
13
8.0
9.0
8.5
C-ll
-------
o
I
••—_—••—•
too
• 0
•0
TO
x «0
•
90
40
10
to
10
0
M_MJ|
•— •
i' t'*:vf '" v^i/rs/r
.
!
i
• i
1 ' '
I
M— KM
1
1
T
i
i.
i
i
i
'
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
'•*,
!
i
j
US STANDARD SltVI SIZES
4 10 i« «,o 40 , *o if o too sro
'K
1
1
I
1
1
1
V
k
N
\
>
v
«
\
i
1
i
i
1
N'l
\
\
;
i
,
1
i
S
fc
s
s
,
1
"
s
.
V
s
V
*%
^_ — .
^,
i .
k
>«
^
**
•»-.
^-^.1
100 10 1.0 O.I 0.01 0.001
•RAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
•OUL
OERS
SONINt NO
PC" 1,
"6
COSILKS
•RAVEL
COARSC ] PINE
SAND
COARSE] MEDIUM | PINE
FIRES
SILT SIZES I CLAT SIZCS
E LEV. OR DEPTH
NAT «C
LL
PL
PI
DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIPICATION
6RAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
.« 1223-87-216
SOIL a MATERIAL ENGINEERS,
INC.
DUNCAN I
rkA 1O
INC . R»L«ICM T*l
-------
1 100
so
so
TO
• 0
SO
40
SO
<0
10
0
IT
1
S" j'M/f l'l/4'tf
}
,
1
1
~~s
1
i
•
i
•
i
j,
i.
•
•
i
•
•
i
'
•
i
•
•
i
•
•
i
r*
-*
*r
m
i
U S STANDARD SIEVE SIZE
4 10 IS ^0 40 , SO M
i
•
S
i
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
i
I
i
i
]
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
s
\
V
y
s
s
.
™
S,
i
i
i
1
A
1
]
1
1
, i
|S
;
1;
T
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
k
\
•
0 tOO ITO
s
s
1
S
S
^55
1
X
C
••^
^
^=;
i ••
i
•
100 10 1.0 O.I 0.01 0.001
•RAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
•OUL
•EM
BORINS NO
PC* 1,
COSSLES
•RAVEL
COARSE FINE
SAND
COARSEI MEDIUM | FINE
FINES
SILT SIZES ! CLAT SIZES
EL EV. OR DEPTH
•AT WC
LL
PL
pi
DESCRIPTION OR CLASSIFICATION
GRAIN SIZ
JOS NO
SOIL a MATERIAL
E DISTRIBUTION
1223-87-216
. ENGINEERS,
INC.
DUNCAN.PAHNILL INC.. HALCICH TCI
-------
s- I'M/I- rs/4'i/n/s' 4
100
fCMCEUT riNCR ST WEISNT
- M H * «• • -4 • •
0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O
•••
— i
\
—\
•out
OCNI
•04IMS MO
PC* 1,
*5
100
COSILCS
ELEV. MOCPTN
r - H
i- - -1
1
i T
1
.
i I
i
i
•
!
i
i
i
;
i
i
i
•
10
• RAVCL
eoANse I riNC
•AT WC
LL
PL 1
T>
i
T '
i
i i
i
i
r i
i
i
i
i
i
^
i
i
i
S
U S STANOANO SIEVE SIZCI
10 I* 1,0 40 SO If
-------
Io e o o o o <
o • • •- » * <
iNSHM At II
SO
to
10
0
i
i
100
•OWL
••••
COStLIS
r~
f
i
r
\.
•
i
i
'
•
•
i
•
}
t
•
U 9 STANBANO SIEVE
ri/«" 4 10 It 1,0 40 •
IT
i
•k
i
i
I
\
\l
A
s
1
SL
IS
s
i
i
S
'
•-
•
size
0 K
s
X
i
0
s
too tro
'
..
s
*>
V
s
S
»
%
«•
••.
••55
^
10 1.0 O.I 0.01 0.001
MAIN SIZE IN MILLIMCTCM
••AVIL
COARSC
FINE
SANO
COANSef MEDIUM | FINE
FINES
SILT Sizes | CLAV SIZES
SOUINt NO 1
PCI 2,
#1
[LEV. 0* DEPTH
•AT V(
LL
PL
PI
OCSCNIPTION ON CLASSIFICATION
SC
»RAIN SIZ
409 HO
IIL a MATERIAI
C DISTRIBUTION
1223-87-216
_ ENGINEERS, INC.
DUMCAM PAHNILL. IMC . M*LII«H T«l
-------
U S STANOAMO SlfVf SIICI
1" I'M/*" I*V«' l/ri/«" « 10 1 V> 40 «0. ,19
100
00
• 0
TO
5 «
SO
40
10
to
10
0
•••<
I
— (
"1
.
— I
1 —
— \
•out
• OftIM NO
PC 1 2,
«v
ei
100
IttLCS
ILCV. OMOCPTN
1
1
-^
I ..
1
l
I.
i
1
1
l
l
i
1
i
l
i
i
i
i
i
1
10
COAHSC I FINI
•AT WC
LL
PL 1
"-K
1
i
L
1
I j
1
1
i
i
-•frl
" i i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
S
s
1
\
s
s
-»
w
. k
—
X
i
•
i
i
i
i
«
^i
T
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
^
^
X
1
o too tro
S^i.
1.0 0.
•MAIN SIZC IN MICLIMCTCM
SARD
COAMEl HCOIUH I H«
i
i
>
i
,
•
„
^
s
s
V
S
,
>
^^
^^5=
• •
0.01 0.001
rmcf
CLAY SIICI
»i pescmpnoM on CLASSIFICATIOH
(
S(
3RAJN SI2
409 •€
)IL 8 MATERIA
£ DISTRIBUT1
1223-87-216
L ENGINEERS, IN
LL INC . RALII«M 7(1
-------
O
I
U S STANDARD SIEVE 811 El
•• I-M/IT V4't/r»/f" « 10 i ^o 40 «o. 19
100
• 0
• D
TO
5 ««
•0
40
10
10
10
0
~n
"r
i i
-• — i
i
t
1
tout.
DERI
•Odin* NO
PCI 2, #4
100
CODDLES
ELEV. ONDKPTN
t
r
•
1 " ' t
i
1.
•
1
1
' 1
l
i
1
i
l
i
i
i
i
l
10
•RAVCL
COANSK
rim
NAT WC
LL
H. 1
'**»•
•
i
t
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
s
\
\
s
^
S i
1
1
1
1
_i
"l
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
J
1
S
s.
v
IMBBl
1
0
s
too iro
•
|
•
i
I
'
1.0 O.I
•MAIN Size IN MILLINCTCM
SAND
CO A II 1C | MEDIUM ] FINE
1 s
^
^
»__
^\
^^^
V,
**
k,
*5
--*
•*• .
i • •
O.Ol 0.001
FINES
CLAT SIZE)
H DESCRIPTION ON CLASSIFICATION
f
S(
3RAJN SI2
40D NC
)IL a MATERIA
£ DISTRIBUTION
, 1223-87-216
L ENGINEERS,
INC.
OUMCAN-^AHNILL. INC . RAL«I«M 7*1
-------
APPENDIX D
PHASE II SOIL WASHING ANALYTICAL RESULTS
D-l
-------
APPENDIX D
Sample ID Key - Phase II Analytical Results
A = Type of wash performed
P = prewash - wet sieve only
F = final wash (Phase II)
T = final wash (Phase II) performed in duplicate for TCLP analysis
B = SARM tested
LMHO = SARMI
LMLO = SARM II
HMLO = SARM III
HMHO = SARM IV
C = Run number - type of wash
Rl = tap water wash D = duplicate
R2 = chelant wash T = triplicate
R3 = surfactant wash
D = Soil size fraction submitted for analysis
10 = greater than 10 mesh (+2 mm)
10-60 = less than 10 mesh, greater than 60 mesh (2 mm to 250 urn)
60 = less than 60 mesh (<250
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
1 OF 35
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMLO/R1/60 &
F/LMLO/R1T/60
22.8
50
88
622
679
65
1,280
F/LMLO/R1D/60
7
2
.3
43.46
26
60
92
681
741
72.0
1,480
42.37
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER LO118
PAGE_2_ OF 35
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
% Moisture
F/HMHO/R1/60
858
612
2,040
16,900
22,100
1,150
33,600
51.24
F/HMHO/R1D/60
991
674
2,310
19,900
25,700
1,330
38,900
52.12
F/LMLO/R1/10
3.0
2.5
<0.76
4.2
1.5
4.3
14.0
3.07
F/LMLO/R1/10-60 &
F/LMLO/R1T/10-60
5.3
9.5
4.2
25.3
112
7.5
82.2
19.12
Approvea ty,/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Associa'.'on lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemicai
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Uddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_1_ OF 35
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMLO/R1D/10
2.0
9.4
1.0
5.9
6.5
3.7
28.1
0.60
F/LMLO/R1D/10-60
3.0
11.0
3.8
25.6
25.9
6.9
132
19.25
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield o( testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-65
-------
£53
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
A OF 3R
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
% Moisture
F/HMHO/R1/10
5.90
F/HMHO/R1/10-60 F/HMHO/R1D/10 F/HMHO/R1D/10-60
1
89.
433
7.
158
154
37.
,080
0
7
9
114
284
26.
450.
958
53.
3,080
5
9
164
263
7
137
182
21
666
.7
.6
1
3
107
289
31
484
,560
58
,560
.4
.9
15.55
4.17
20.35
Approves by
Laboratory Manager
Tine
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
93-9-85
-------
rsi
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
58' 5 Madlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
i'Hr
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ro IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_5_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/60 & F/LMLO/R1T/60
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Cone.
Spike
Added
60.5 (MS)
69.4 (MSD)
60.5 (MS)
69.4 (MSD)
60.5 (MS)
69.4 (MSD)
60.5 (MS)
69.4 (MSD)
60.5 (MS)
69.4 (MSD)
60.5 (MS)
69.4 (MSD)
60.5 (MS)
69.4 (MSD)
Sample
Result
22.8
50.9
88.6
622
679
65.1
1,280
Cone.
MS
81.5
98.9
133
688
682
113
1,350
%
Rec.
97
79
73
109
5*
79
116
Cone.
MSD
87.7
111
150.
783
763
125
1,490
%
Rec.
94
86
88
232*
121
86
303*
RPD
3.1
8.5
19
72*
*
8.5
*
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
* = Sample concentration greater than 4 times spike added, therefore EPA criteria do not
apply.
MS Spike Added = 40 yg/ml x 1 ml/1.17 gram * 0.5654 = 60.5 vg/gram dry weight.
MSD Spike Added = 40 ug/ml x 1 ml/1.02 gram * 0.5654 = 69.4 yg/gram dry weight.
% Moisture = 43.46
Approved bv^
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ol testing as listed m the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/10-60
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm)
DATE REPORTED-
PROJECT CODE.
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
& F/LMLO/R1T/10-60
on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
Cone.
Spike
Compound Added
Arsenic 43.8 (MS)
47.1 (MSD)
Cadmium 43.8 (MS)
47.1 (MSD)
Chromium 43.8 (MS)
47.1 (MSD)
Copper 43.8 (MS)
47.1 (MSD)
Lead 43.8 (MS)
47.1 (MSD)
Nickel 43.8 (MS)
47.1 (MSD)
Zinc 43.8 (MS)
47.1 (MSD)
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
% Moisture = 19.12
Sample Cone. %
Result MS Rec.
5.3 41.4 82
9.5 45.7 83
4.2 38.6 78
25.3 73.4 110
112 70.2 0
7.5 41.9 78
82.2 219 312
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24767
L0118
6 OF 3R
RECOVERY
Cone. %
MSD Rec.
41.7 77
46.8 79
40.7 77
63.9 82
62.4 ' 0
41.8 73
114 68
RPD
<
^
4.9
1.3
29
—
6.6
-__
Note: Sample was reanalyzed to confirm results. Both sets of data are provided.
/// , ^^ / /i /<— 4- !• j m
C^t-L f-d^ ' S / L- f 7— <_< — •
Approved by,/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
I.e.; c; lest.r.s as .istea :r 'he cuner1 AALA Director.' o! Accredited Labcra'cnes
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
58' 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara
11499 Chester
Cincinnati, OH
Sample Description:
Concentration units
Compound
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Locke
Road
45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24767
L0118
7 OF 1$
F/LMLO/R1/10-60 & F/LMLO/R1T/10-60 (rerun)
are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX
Cone.
Spike Sample
Added Result
43.8 (MS) 4.1
47.1 (MSD)
43.8 (MS) 9.3
47.1 (MSD)
43.8 (MS) 4.2
47.1 (MSD)
43.8 (MS) 24.2
47.1 (MSD)
43.8 (MS) 103
47.1 (MSD)
43.8 (MS) 6.7
47.1 (MSD)
43.8 (MS) 78.6
47.1 (MSD)
weight basis
SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Cone. %
MS Rec.
43.3 90.
48.7 90.
37.2 75
66.9 97
67.4 0*
40.7 78
223 330*
Cone. %
MSD Rec.
44.1 85
49.1 85
38.9 74
58.2 72
59.8 0*
41.5 74
116 79
RPD
5.7
5.7
1.3
30.
0
5.3
123
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
* = Spike added is -2 times less than native analyte.
Approved by/ ,
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED: September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
8 OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/60 & F/LMLO/R1T/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
800
ND
ND
<440 (200)
<440 (400)
ND
750
Remarks: 440 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 43.46
Approved i
Laboratory Manager
Tine
Accredited by the Amer.car, Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
I.e.; c' test:r.g as lis-ed :r tne curren' AALA Directory o; Accredited Laboro»cner
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_9__ OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
210
11
ND
74
100
<9 (2)
290
Remarks: 9
ND
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 42.37
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER LO118
PAGE 11 OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-d i chloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(vg/kg dry weight)
100,000
86,000
16,000
2,300,000
190,000
150,000
3,600,000
Remarks: 1,300
ND
<
i
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 52.12
Approvec by t/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accre±ted ty the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
93-9-8S
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Mifldlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_LQ_ OF 25
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
140,000
49,000
ND
1,800,000
110,000
92,000
2,900,000
Remarks: 1,300
ND
<
1
Quantitatlon Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 51.24
Approved of/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-B5
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE—J2— OF ?*
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
320
<5 (2)
ND
10.
10.
ND
29
Remarks: 5 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 3.07
Approved by '
Laboratory Manager
Tine
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica.
' e.a o' tes;.nc cs hs'ec ir the currer.t AAIA D:rec!cry o! Accrednec Lcborcnones
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 VliddieDrooK Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE 14 OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
\<
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
690
<10. (3)
ND
17
22
ND
52
Remarks: 10. = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 0.60
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_13_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
\
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
310
8
ND
54
96
ND
220
Remarks: 6 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 19.12
Approved by c/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
'.•s\~ c' tes^.rj cs hs'eS ~ :re curre-.' AA1A D.redsry o' Accredited Lsncra'cne;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_15_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(pg/kg dry weight)
310
18
<6 (1)
110
160
<6 (3)
400
Remarks: 6 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 19.25
Approved b^/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory oi Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_16_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
\
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
7,800
<25 (22)
39
86
ND
<25 (8)
200
Remarks: 25 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 5.90
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica!
.'je.o o' testiig as lis'ea ;r. me currer.' AAl.'-. O.rectcry o: Accreaite: Lasorcrlcnes
93-9-65
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE__L8__ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
\j
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
3,800
<26 (18)
<26 (17)
73
ND
ND
160
Remarks: 26
ND
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit. Values
1n parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.17
Approved by
aboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE__1Z_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
2,900
610
ND
6,100
ND
820
9,600
Remarks: 300 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
= This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 15.55
Approved by.
7/c
Laboratory Manager
Title
£<•_
Accredltea by tne American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation :r. the chemical
Sie.z o: tesv.ng as I;stec :r. tr.e currer,! AALA Directory o.( Accredited Latoratores
93-9-85
-------
rra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 M:ddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE JO OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
8,800
2:, 400
390
23.0TO
5,400
3,800
40,000
Remarks: 310 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit.
= This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 20.35
Approved tsf
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_2Q_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/60 & F/LMLO/R1T/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are yg/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
acetone1
1,2-dichloroethane
tetrachloroethene
ethyl benzene
chlorobenzene
styrene
xylenes
Cone.
Spike
Added
1,500
1,500
440
440
440
440
440
Sample
Result
1,800
ND
ND
91
<25 (18)
130
300
Cone.
MS
3,000
1,300
420
490
430
550
720
Rec.
80.
87
95
111
94
95
95
Cone.
MSD
3,100
1,700
410
490
420
530
680
Rec.
87
113
93
111
91
91
86
RPD
-8.4
-26
2.1
0
3.2
4.3
9.9
Remarks: 44
ND
RPD
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not Detected
Relative Percent Difference
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This compound has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
Note: The original sample was reanalyzed along with the matrix spike/matrix spike dupli<
cate. The reanalysis results are reported rather than the original run.
Approved byv
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accred:tei ty the Amer.car. Asscciatior tor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemics
93-5 e-:
-------
E53
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24767
L0118
_2J OF_35__
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/10-60 & F/LMLO/R1T/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
acetone1
1,2-dichloroethane
tetrachloroethene
ethyl benzene
chlorobenzene
styrene
xylenes
Cone.
Spike
Added
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
Sample
Result
310
ND
ND
54
8
96
220
RPD
Remarks: 6
ND
RPD
i
QuantHatlon Limit
Not Detected
Relative Percent Difference
This compound has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_22_ OF 1*
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/60 & F/LMLO/R1T/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,100,000
440,000
<14,000 (2,600)
Remarks: 14,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture = 43.46
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Titie
Accredited by the Arr.er.can Association (or Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
!'8.~ :' test.".- cs .:s-ed :r the curre-.' AALA D:rertc"y o! Accredited Labcra'cres
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
"-1
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE__23_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(uq/kg dry weight)
560,000
300,000
<15,000 (6,500)
Remarks: 15,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture » 42.37
Approved by^
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_24_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
6,100,000
3,300,000
390,000
Remarks: 68,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
% Moisture = 51.24
Approved by '
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica!
Jie.c o' lesiir.s as ::stes ir. trie current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratcr.es
93-9-65
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE__25_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bi s(2-ethylhexy1)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
4,300,000
2,900,000
<390,000 (330,000)
Remarks: 390,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture - 52.12
Approved b^x.
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association for Laboralory Accreditation m the chemical
tield ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
EH
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE__26_ OF 3*
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
\.
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<9,600 (3,700)
23,000
ND
Remarks: 9,600 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantisation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture = 3.07
Approved byj/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accreditec by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
: e.c c: testing cs listec in the current AAU\ Directory o; Accredited Labc-ctcres
92-5-Sr
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
"'I
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGF ZS OF 1*
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
.(y.g/kg dry weight)
<9,300 (2,600)
31,000
ND
Remarks: 9,300 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture « 0.60
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
-r//*
5815 Middlebrook Pike* Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE__2Z_ OF 3*
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/10-60 & F/LMLO/R1T/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bi s(2-ethy1hexy1)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
100,000
44,000
<12,000 (5,100)
Remarks: 12,000
ND
<
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture = 19.12
Approvea
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
* eo c' tes'i^o cs hstec .-. *\e curren* f^^A Direc^cr,* o' Accredited Ldbcrc'zr^s
93-9-8!
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
?Q OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
\
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
250,000
49,000
<12,000 (8,500)
Remarks: 12,000
ND
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture * 19.25
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_3D_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
40,000
<37,000 (7,500)
<37,000 (25,000)
Remarks: 37,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantisation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture = 5.90
Approved by S
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amer.car. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the cherr.ica:
lie.: c: testing as listed .r !".e current AALA D:reci;*v o! Accrec,:tec Lcocratcnes
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike » Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED: September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER: L0118
PAGE_31_ OF **
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
2,200,000
<42,000 (26,000)
<42,000 (36,000)
Remarks: 42,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture = 15.55
^^ ^
Approved b^/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield c' testing as listed ir. tr.e curreT AALA Directory o: Accre^i'ec Labo'C'sres
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
81 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_32_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<19,000 (16,000)
<19,000 (4,000)
21,000
Remarks: 19,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture = 4.17
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER. L0118
PAGE_34_ OF **
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/60 & F/LMLO/R1T/60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are yg/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
pentachlorophenol
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
Cone.
Spike
Added
91,000 (MS)
87,000 (MSD)
360,000 (MS)
350,000 (MSD)
180,000 (MS)
170,000 (MSD)
Sample Cone.
Result MS
2,600
440,000
Rec.
24,000 24
Cone. %
MSD Rec.
12,000 11
1,100,000 1,800,000 194 1,200,000 29
790,000 194
620,000 106
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
% Moisture = 43.46
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica!
iiejc o! tesnr.a as listed in the curren' AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
561 5 V'ddlebrook P'ke • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_33_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
\i
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
3,200,000
<45,000 (43,000)
<45,000 (42,000)
Remarks: 45,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are less than the quantitation limit and are therefore
estimated.
% Moisture = 20.35
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
iield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED.
PROJECT CODE.
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE_
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
J OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 5, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kgj£pm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
P/LMLO/R1/60
24.61
V
P/LMLO/R1D/60
P/LMHO/R1/60
33.95
35.07
P/LMHO/R1D/60
29.7
39.5
44.7
408
431
40.6
902
24.8
51.3
68.3
582
602
54.0
1,300
19.6
28.2
42.5
385
398
34.6
728
17.3
24.5
37.9
330.
341
30.7
629
40.42
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
!ie!d o! testing as listec ir. the current AALA Directory ol A-crediled Laboratones
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24767
ORDER NUMBER L0118
PAGE_3JL_ OF 35
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R1/10-60 & F/LMLO/R1T/10-60 (Soil) received August 7, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
pentachlorophenol
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
Cone.
Spike
Added
14,000 (MS)
15,000 (MSD)
56,000 (MS)
61,000 (MSD)
28,000 (MS)
31,000 (MSD)
Sample Cone.
Result MS
5,100
44,000
Rec.
4,300 -5.7
100,000 120,000 36
49,000 18
Rec. 9
5,600 3.3 -;
Cone.
MSD
200,000 164
63,000 61
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
% Moisture = 19.12
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation m the chemical
Held of testing as listed in the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER-
PAGE-
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_3 HP 41
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 5, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
P/LMLO/R1D/10
8.3
3.7
1.4
11.7
11.3
3.2
28.5
3.78
P/LMLO/R1D/10-60
6.1
10.9
4.2
30.8
29.6
8.5
182
14.48
L^-^^t^ st^
//'
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
!:° - c' testiig as hstea ;r. the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
93-9-65
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE.
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_2 OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 5, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
P/HMLO/R1/60
1,070
702
2,250
1,880
27,400
1,380
44,400
53.02
P/HMLO/R1D/60
1,000
661
2,220
21,200
30,300
1,350
49,400
53.77
P/LMLO/R1/10
2.2
2.6
<0.86
5.4
6.4
<1.7
10.4
5.19
P/LMLO/R1/10-60
3.0
12.7
7.5
52.6
76.5
10.4
332
14.37
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
hela ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER-
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_5 OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 5, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
P/HMLO/R1/10
5.24
P/HMLO/R1/10-60
60.0
333
11.8
129
258
28.1
691
81.6
278
18.8
273
513
46.3
1,280
16.48
P/HMLO/R1D/10
5.18
P/HMLO/R1D/10-60
61.5
309
5.3
84.4
141
20.9
534
94.6
298
20.0
283
447
47.0
1,110
17.89
Approved 1
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
:.e ~ c' tes' is as ;.s'e~ .- T.e r_r-ev AALj1 D:rectjry o! Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_4 OP 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 5, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
P/LMHO/R1/10
3.7
4.6
3.9
8.9
10.0
4.3
29.0
4.57
P/LMHO/R1/10-60
3.0
10.8
2.9
31.6
29.6
7.4
202
16.50
P/LMHO/R1D/10
3.3"
4.9
1.8
11.7
12.7
6.3
42.3
2.91
P/LMHO/R1D/10-60
5.6
11.7
1.7
29.6
27.3
6.3
100.
17.16
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association for Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike* Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__JL_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
4,900
44
9
290
210
20.
880
Remarks: 8
ND
1
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 33.95
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
'. e z -'
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Wiodieorook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
fi OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
2,700
<33 (25)
ND
170
320
ND
860
Remarks: 33
ND
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 24.61
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
iieid ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8E
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
9 _ OF 41 _
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
210,000
5,900
<2,100 (930)
94,000
21,000
11,000
170,000
Remarks: 2,100
ND
i _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 40.42
Approved tfy
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
!ie:s o: testing as listed ir. :r.e current AALA Director,' o! Accredited Lcocrrrres
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 MiddlebrooK Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PA^F R OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
160,000
38,000
ND
300,000
48,000
74,000
430,000
Remarks: 960
ND
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 35.07
Approvea by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iiela ot testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-6!
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE U OF 4J
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(uq/kg dry weight)
6,700
780
ND
17,000
2,800
2,000
36,000
Remarks: 540 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 53.77
Approved 1
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemical
iie.d o' lest.ng as listea in the curren: AALA Directory o: Accredited Laboraior.es
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
: i V it*}
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2 )
PAGE__1D_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
8,400
500
<53
6,600
2,000
970
11,000
(12)
Remarks:
53 =
ND =
< =
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 53.02
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Tide
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER. 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__14_ OF 4J
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
3,000
<5 (2)
NO
10.
16
ND
21
Remarks:
5 =
ND =
< =
1 =
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 3.78
Approved oy P.
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar, Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
l:eic o' tes':-.? as hstec, r. 'he curler.' AALA Directory o: Accredited Laocratone;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
1? OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,200
<5 (2)
ND
9
15
ND
30.
Remarks: 5 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 5.19
bf^>^.
Approved by5'
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_JJL_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
dry weight)
1,600
ND
<29 (6)
53
72
ND
130
Remarks: 29 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 14.48
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association (or Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica!
'.e.: c: testir.j as Usiec :r tne Currer.: AALA Directory o! Accreanec LsDcra'cries
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Micdlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE.
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_L3_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
3,200
490
41
3,700
ND
190
7,900
Remarks: 29 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 14.37
Approved by'
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
deld ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
•;//'
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__JJB_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg^dry weight)
23,000
ND
<26 (6)
36
25
ND
94
Remarks: 26 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 2.91
£.<—
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by trie American Assonation lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
:ie)c o: lesf.na as listec, :r the curren' .AA1A Directory o: Accreanec. L-anorctones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
Ifi np 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
\.
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
43,000
<26 (10.)
ND
40.
33
ND
100
Remarks:
26 =
ND =
< =
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.57
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER. 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__19_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
72,000
1,600
<380 (170)
13,000
ND
960
29,000
Remarks: 380 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 17.16
Approvea ay
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
::e:d o: test.r.p as listed, ir. tr.e current AALA. Directory o' Accredited Lar>crc:!cr.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
58'5 Miaaiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 •615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_12_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
30,000
1,100
<300 (46)
9,200
ND
590
23,000
Remarks: 300 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
i
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 16.50
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Tiile
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_22_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,700
15
<5 (1)
76
ND
7
89
Remarks: 5 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 5.18
Approved fas'
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredlled ty the American Association lor Laboralory Accreditation in the chemical
I.e.z o: testing as ):stec3 ir. tne current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_20_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
\j
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,900
12
<5 (1)
56
34
<5 (4)
2,000
Remarks: 5
ND
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 5.24
Approved by'
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association for Laborartory Accreditation in the chemical
tield of testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
'.VSI^
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__23_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
1,100
400
<30. (28)
570
ND
520
1,300
Remarks: 30. = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 17.89
Approved by
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Viddlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_21_ OF 4J
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
\.
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
4,300
160
<30. (18)
1,200
ND
92
2,600
Remarks: 30.
ND
1 _
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
Moisture = 16.48
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accrealtea bYthe Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield oi testing as listed in the current AALA Directory oi Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED.
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
?5 OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
\l
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
800,000
460,000
<13,000 (9,400)
Remarks: 13,000
ND
<
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
parenthesis are estimated.
Values in
Moisture = 33.95
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accred:tea by trie Amencan Association tor Laooratory Accreditation in the chemicc,:
•e.z :' tes-" as l:s'ec, :- the r-rre-.' AA1A Director/ c: Accredited Lrbcrcrcr.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_24_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
730,000
450,000
15,000
Remarks: 12,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND » Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
% Moisture = 24.61
Approved by ff
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_2J_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
680,000
1,100,000
<150,000 (49,000)
Remarks: 150,000
ND
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
Values in
% Moisture = 40.42
Approved by
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
815 Middleorook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2 )
PAGE 26 OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
dry weiht)
760,000
1,400,000
77,000
Remarks: 15,000 = Quantitation limit.
NO = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
% Moisture = 35.07
Approved byiX
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__29_ OF 4J
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(tig/kg dry weight)
1,000,000
770,000
<84,000 (46,000)
Remarks: 84,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 53.77
Approved by
-------
nra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED- September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_28_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concer.tration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,500,000
1,000,000
<74,000 (44,000)
Remarks: 74,000 = Quantisation limit.
NO * Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 53.02
Approved by * . . ..
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboralory Accreditation in the chemical
tieid ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
5.0 QA/QC PROCEDURES
The QA/QC procedures that are applicable to the full-scale operation
include procedures that relate to the following activities:
0 Sample preparation
0 Laboratory analysis
0 Data reduction, validation, and reporting
The procedures that will be followed to ensure that high quality data is
generated and maintained throughout the performance of this subtask with
regard to these activities is detailed in the QA/QC Plan for the overall work
assignment and, therefore, will not be reiterated here.
E-37
-------
Other Equipment Failure
If any other equipment on site fails to operate properly, the Project
Team Leader and Site Safety Officer v/ill be notified and the effect of this
failure on continuing operations on site will be determined. If the failure
affects the safety of personnel or prevents completion of the field activ-
ities, all personnel will leave the exclusion zone until the situation is
evaluated and appropriate actions taken.
E-36
-------
Equipment needed to facilitate decontamination include: plastic drop
cloths containers (tubes), decon solution (soap), rinse water and scrub
brushes. These materials will be located outside the exclusion zone.
4.12 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
The following standard emergency procedures will be used by onsite
personnel. The PEI industrial hygienists will be notified of any onsite
emergencies.
Personnel Injury in the Exclusion Zone
Upon notification of an injury in the exclusion zone, the support per-
sonnel will enter (using the proper level of protection) if needed. The
injured person should be moved to the decontamination line. The nature of
the injury will be evaluated and the affected person will be decontaminated
to the extent possible prior to movement to the support zone. The appro-
priate first aid will be administered and arrangements will be made with the
designated medical facility (if required). No person shall reenter the
exclusion zone until the cause of the injury or symptoms is determined.
Fire/Explosion
In the event of a fire or explosion, the fire department will be noti-
fied and personnel will move to a safe distance from the affected area.
Personal Protective Equipment Failure
If any site worker experiences a failure or alternation of protective
equipment that affects the protection factor, that person and his/her buddy
will immediately leave the exclusion zone. Reentry will not be permitted
until the equipment has been repaired or replaced.
E-35
-------
TABLE 4-2. LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING EQUIPMENT
Monitoring equipment
Hazard
Ambient level
Action
Combustible gas indicator
Explosive
atompshere
<10% LEL
10%-25%
>25% LEL
Oxygen concentration meter Oxygen
19.5%-25%
>25.0%
Continue investiga-
tion with caution
Continue on-site
monitoring with ex-
treme caution as
high levels are en-
countered
Explosion hazard;
withdraw from area
immediately
Monitor wearing SCBA
NOTE: Combustible
gas readings are not
valid in atmospheres
with <19.5% oxygen
Continue investi-
gation with caution;
SCBA not needed,
based on oxygen
content only
Discontinue inspec-
tion; fire hazard
potential; consult
specialist
E-34
-------
(National Mines Model MX241 or equivalent). The CGI alarm will be set at 25
percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL). The necessary action levels are
listed in Table 4-2.
4.9 PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
The following protective equipment will be worn at all times by field
personnel working inside the building during actual blending activities.
Level B protection
*
1) Supplied air respirator
pressure-demand, self-contained breathing apparatus
pressure-demand, airline respirator with escape bottle
2) Chemical resistant inner and outer gloves
0 Viton - for volatiles and semivolatiles except acetone
0 Butyl rubber - for acetone
3) Chemical resistant steel toe and shank outer boots
4) Chemical resistant splash suit
5) Hard hat and splash shield (optional)
4.10 FIELD OPERATING PROCEDURES
During the SARMS blending operation, the mixing equipment, soil con-
tainers, and chemical containers will be properly banded and grounded ac-
cording to 29 CFR §1910.106. The soil-chemical blending procedures will be
carried out as determined by the bench-scale operation (see Section 3.1).
Drums of soil will be handled using a "drum hydra-lift" or equivalent
drum handling equipment.
4.11 DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES
Personnel and equipment leaving the exclusion zone will be thoroughly
decontaminated using the standard Level B decontamination protocol.
E-33
-------
TABLE 4-1 (continued)
Substance
Exposure symptom
First-aid
Lead sulfate
Zinc oxide
Cadmium sulfate
Arsenic trioxide
Copper sulfate
Chromic oxide
Nickel nitrate
Strong eye and skin
irritation, mucous
membrane irritation
Skin and eye irritation,
metallic taste, throat
irritation
Dryness of throat, cough,
headache, feeling of
constriction of chest,
nausea, shortness of
breath
Mucous membrane and
pharynx irritation,
eye irritation, metal
taste, dermatitis
Allergic skin rash,
respiratory irritation
Artificial
respiration
Irrigate eyes
immediately,
promptly wash
skin with soap
Water wash skin,
artificial
respiration
E-32
-------
TABLE 4-1. EMERGENCY MEDICAL INFORMATION
Substance
Exposure symptom
First-aid
Anthracene
Pentachlorophenol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Skin irritation
Weakness, resp. changes,
dermatitis, convulsions
Skin, eye irritation
Eye irritation, mucous
membrane irritation
Dizziness, excitement,
drowsiness, incoherence,
staggering gait
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene ENT irritation, nausea,
vertigo, incoherence
Acetone
ENT irritation, dizziness,
dermatitis
Chlorobenzene
Styrene
Eye and nose irritation,
drowsiness, incoherence,
skin irritation
Eye and nose irritation,
drowsiness, weak, unsteady
gait, nausea
Irrigate eyes,
wash skin with
soap, artificial
respiration
Irrigate eyes,
water wash skin
Irrigate eyes
immediately,
promptly wash
skin with soap
Irrigate eyes
immediately,
promptly wash
skin with soap
Irrigate eyes
immediately,
promptly wash
skin with soap,
artificial
respiration
Irrigate eyes
immediately,
promptly wash
with soap,
artificial
respiration
Irrigate eyes
immediately,
water flush
skin, artificial
respiration
(continued)
E-31
-------
4.6 EMERGENCY MEDICAL INFORMATION
The availability of information regarding the exposure symptoms of each
individual chemical being used during the full-scale activities is critical
to maintain the health and safety of field personnel. In addition, all
field personnel will be familiar with the first-aid requirements of each
chemical. Table 4-1 presents a summary of critical emergency medical in-
formation associated with each of the 17 contaminants.
4.7 EMERGENCY CONTACTS
In addition to being familiar with chemical-specific first aid measures,
all field personnel will be aware of the various local agencies and facil-
ities that are potentially available during an emergency situation. These
local agencies/facilities and their phone numbers are as follows:
Agency/Facility Phone number
Cincinnati Police 765-1212
Cincinnati Fire Department 241-2525
St. Francis - St. George Hospital 389-5000
University of Cincinnati Hospital 872-3100
Ambulance (Cincinnati Fire Department) 241-2525
Poison Control Center 872-5111
PEI Associates 782-4700
4.8 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
During the SARMS blending operation, continuous air monitoring will be
carried out adjacent to the mixer with a combustible gas indicator (CGI).
Monitoring will be conducted with a continuous-operating CGI with an alarm
E--30
-------
4.3 PERSONNEL HEALTH AND SAFETY TRAINING
All personnel involved in the SARMS blending operation will be trained
and experienced in the proper use of personnel protective equipment as re-
quired in 29 CFR §1910.120. This includes instruction in levels of protec-
tion, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), air-purifying respirators
and respirator decision logic. All individuals required to wear an air-
•"•- 7 _^
*r >~rf/v *rs-~-*«
purifying respirator will be fit-tested and a record of the fit-test will be
A
on file at PEL
4.4 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE
The PEI medical monitoring program requires that employees involved in
hazardous waste site activities receive a baseline medical examination and
annual medical examination. Personnel involved in the SARMS blending opera-
tion have been trained in Red Cross first-aid. In addition, one of the field
personnel who will be working at the site is experienced as an Advanced Life
Support paramedic.
4.5 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS
The following types of medical equipment will be present onsite, within
eacy access by all field personnel:
First-aid kit - outside blending building
Emergency eye wash - outside blending building
Emergency shower - outside blending building
Fire extinguishers - inside blending building
outside blending building
E-29
-------
4.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS
The following section discusses the health and safety procedures and
requirements that will be followed and met, respectively, during the full-
scale SARMS blending operation at EPA's Center Hill facility.
4.1 ONSITE CONTROL
Access to the SARMS blending building will be through a locked door,
coordinated by the PEI staff at the site and will be limited to individuals
wearing the proper level of protection. Two individuals will work inside the
building to prepare the SARM samples and a minimum of one person outside the
building to assist and support the people inside. For the purpose of the
project and the health and safety plan, the building will be considered the
"exclusion zone" during actual SARM preparation and entry into this exclusion
zone will require Level B protection.
The full-scale SARMS blending operation will be conducted using a 15-ft
mortar mixer located inside a 16' x 19' building. The building will be
ventilated and the vented air will be carbon-filtered.
4.2 SITE PLAN
Figure 4-1 shows the plan of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Center Hill Research Facility indicating the building to be used for the
SARMS blending, all structures in the vicinity of the building, and the
locations of telephones and first aid stations.
E-27
-------
spill response report will be submitted to the Center Hill contact and the
EPA Project Officer describing, in detail, the nature and extent of the spill
and the cleanup response measures. Any incident of significance will also be
reported to PEI's staff industrial hygienist and project manager for further
discussion and review.
Additional emergency response measures and procedures are described in
Section 4.0, Health and Safety Procedures.
E-26
-------
as the procedures to be followed during actual blending of the SARM samples.
The minimization of release potential will be accomplished by a number of
mechanisms; 1) only trained, experienced individuals will participate in the
actual blending operations, 2) appropriate personal protective gear will be
worn to provide field personnel the security and comfort to work confidently
with the contaminant chemicals and resulting SARM samples, 3) equipment has
been selected and modified to minimize the potential for leaks, chemical in-
compatibility, ignition source, and breakage, and 4) individual chemicals
will be combined, to the greatest extent possible, before the actual blending
begins, reducing the total number of times that a spill could occur.
It is impossible to eliminate all risk of spills or releases, therefore,
a contingency plan for containment and cleanup has been developed for the
full-scale blending operations. Fugitive volatile organics will unavoidably
be released when SARM material is transferred from the mixer to the shipping
containers and possibly during the blending. Emissions from the mixer
(closed and opened) will be collected by a field-fabricated fume hood de-
signed to provide an airflow past the mixer sufficient to capture fugitive
volatile organics and pass them through an activated carbon filter.
In the event of a chemical or contaminanted-soil spill the key personnel
(in Level B protective gear) will implement measures necessary to: 1) halt
the release, 2) contain the spread of contaminants, and 3) promptly begin
cleanup of spilled and contaminated materials. Cleanup materials will be
stored inside the shed and will include sorbent materials, an empty salvage
drum, shovels, dustpans, etc. Contaminated materials will be placed in the
salvage drum for later disposal. An accurate estimate of the amount of
material spilled and an evaluation of the adequacy of the cleanup will be
made. The spill incident and response measures taken will be documented. A
E-25
-------
The pour-spout on the mixer may also be used to fill the 5-gallon pails,
however, a shovel will probably be necessary to efficiently fill these con-
tainers. The four 5-gallon pails for each of the four SARM types will be
filled from one of four single batch-mixes.
The 400 0.5-lb SARM samples to be archived will be placed in pre-labeled
sample containers using a stainless steel trowel, and will be immediately
sealed. One-hundred (100) 0.5-gallon jars will be filled with each SARM
type. Each archive SARM type will be prepared for a single batch-mix.
Transportation, consignee, and amounts of SARM samples to be shipped to
testing locations are presented in Table 3-4.
3.3 WASTE HANDLING PRACTICES
Contaminated waste materials generated during the full-scale blending
activities will be containerized in DOT 17E open head drums over the course
of the operation. Upon completion of the full-scale field activities, all
containerized waste materials, e.g., spill cleanup materials, absorbents,
protective clothing, decontamination materials, spilled chemicals, etc., will
be treated as hazardous waste. Building materials that cannot be decon-
taminated at the end of field activities (wood, disposable plastic, etc.)
will be disposed of as hazardous waste. A single TCDD waste analysis will be
conducted on the waste materials prior to disposal.
Contaminated materials being disposed of as hazardous waste will be
appropriately manifested using the U.S. EPA's Center Hill Research Facility's
address.
3.4 CHEMICAL RELEASE PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROCEDURES
The potential for an accidental release of contaminants to the environ-
ment will be minimized by the design and construction of the building as well A
E-24
-------
TABLE 3-4. LOCATIONS, QUANTITIES, AND TRANSPORTATION OF SARM SAMPLES
CO
SARM destination
John Zinc Co.
Jake Cambell
Tulsa, OK
Stabilization
Thermal desorption
Robert Fox
IT
312 Directors Rd.
Knoxville, TN
Chemical Treatment
Dr. Thomas 0. Tiernan
Brehm Laboratory
Wright State University
Dayton, OH
Physical treatment
Archive
Container
Size
Number (capacity)
48 55-gal
(500-lb)
8 5-gal
(50-lb)
4 5-gal
(50-lb)
4 5-gal
(50-lb)
4 5-gal
(50-lb)
400 0. 5-gal
(5-lb)
SARM Quantity
Transport mode (ib)
Contract trucking 24,000
Common carrier 400
Common carrier 200
Common carrier 200
Common carrier 200
Contract trucking 2000
-------
grain probe (thief or trier), with the sample being collected on line through
the center of the holder (mixer) lengthwise, with aliquots being taken from
the front, middle, and back of the holder. The operation will be repeated on
each of two lines parallel with and halfway between the original line and
each side of the holder. All collected portions will be analyzed separately
to determine the extent of homogeneity. All sampling equipment will be
cleaned between the collection of each sample.
3.2 SARMS PACKAGING AND SHIPPING
A total of 27,000 Ibs of SARM samples will be prepared and packaged for
shipment to the BOAT testing locations and the archive location. Batches of
1,000 Ibs of each SARM will be prepared at a time. Immediately following the
blending of contaminants with the soil fraction, the SARM will be placed
directly into the appropriate packages for shipment to the BOAT locations and
to the archive storage facility. Table 3-4 identifies the type and number of
containers that will be used to package the SARM samples for the various
BOAT'S and archiving. Twenty-four thousand (24,000) pounds of SARMS will be
packaged in 48 epoxy-lined, 55-gallon steel drums. One-thousand (1,000) Ibs
of SARMS will be packaged in 20 5-gallon steel pails. Two-thousand (2,000)
Ibs of SARMS will be packaged in 400 0.5-gallon glass jars for archiving.
The modified mortar mixer has a pour-spout that will facilitate dumping
the SARM samples directly into SB-gallon drums. Filled drums will be im-
mediately closed, sealed, and labeled. As drums are filled with SARM mate-
rial, they will be moved to the staging area outside the shed. Drums of
clean soil matrix will then be moved into the shed in preparation for blend-
ing the next batch.
E-22
-------
TABLE 3-3 (continued)
a The Hazardous Substance List, which is currently used for EPA's Contract Lab Programs (CLP), is included
herein as Attachment A.
ro
Volatile*
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Styrene
Metals
Lead
Zinc
Cadmium
Arsenic
Copper
Chromium
Nickel
Semi-Volatiles
Anthracene
Pentachlorophenol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
-------
TABLE 3-3. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ANALYTICAL WORK
Sample ID
No. of
samples
Proposed analytes
Intended use of data
1. Clean soil matrix- follow-
ing full-scale mixing of
first 15,000-lb batch
2. Clean soil matrix- follow-
ing full-scale mixing of
second 15,000-lb batch
3. Clean soil matrix- follow-
ing full-scale mixing of
m first 15,000-lb batch
,° 4. Clean soil matrix- follow-
ing full-scale mixing of
second 15,000-lb batch
5. Clean soil matrix- follow-
ing full-scale mixing of
30,000 Ibs
6. SARMS Batch No. 1 after
mixing 6 m1n., and after
12 m1n.
7. SARMS Batch No. 1 after
mixing 6 m1n., and after
12 min.
12
(6 at each
6-min. In-
terval)
(2 at each
6-min. in-
terval)
Cation exchange capacity
Cation exchange capacity
Grain size distribution,
pH, TOC, moisture content,
mineralogy
Grain size distribution,
pH, TOC, moisture content,
mineralogy
Hazardous Substance List3
Pb, and Zn
Confirm homogeneity of mix
Confirm homogeneity of mix
Confirm physical character-
istics are within predeter-
mined range
Confirm physical character-
istics are within predeter-
mined range
Verify "clean" soil is un-
contaminated
Determine mixing time for
SARMS blending
s, semi-volatiles, Confirm that target levels
metalsu are met during blending
[.continued)
-------
1,000 Ibs will be packaged and shipped to U.S. EPA in Edison, New Jersey for
potential future research.
3.1.3 Sample Collection and Analysis
The following five types of soil samples will be collected and analyzed
over the course of the full-scale operations:
1. Clean soil homogeneity samples
2. Clean soil verification sample
3. Clean soil physical parameter samples
4. SARMS homogeneity samples
5. SARMS contaminant target level-confirmation samples.
Table 3-3 presents a summary of the proposed full-scale analytical work.
As briefly discussed in Section 2.1, Phase 1 - Mixing of Clean Soil
Matrix, the clean soil components will be mixed together in a cement mixer in
two separate 15,000-1b batches. Samples from the two batches will be col-
lected using a grain probe during the soil packaging process. Five samples
from each batch will be collected and analyzed for cation exchange capacity
(CEC) to confirm the homogeneity within and between the two batches.
The second and third types of samples will be collected and analyzed to
verify the "clean" nature of the soil matrix, and to confirm that the physi-
cal characteristics of the soil are within predetermined ranges, respec-
tively.
The fourth and fifth types of samples that will be collected will be
used to determine the SARMS mixing time, and to confirm that contaminant
target levels have been met. Contaminated soil from the first 1,000-1b batch
will be sampled from the mixer during various phases of the mixing to deter-
mine homogeneity within the batch. These samples will be collected using a
E-19
-------
TABLE 3-2. FULL-SCALE ADDITIVE QUANTITIES FOR SARMS PREPARATION
SARMS
Additive quantity'
No. 1 (Ibs)
(Solid metal mix)
No. 2 (Ibs)
(Liquid metal mix)
No. 3 (lbs)°
(Anthracene)
No. 4 (Ibs)
(Liquid organic mix)
SARMS 1
High organics
Low metals
1.544
6.5
1.45
33.48
00
SARMS 2
Low organics
Low metals
1.544
0.65
1.45
3.348
SARMS 3
Low organics
High metals
55.938
6.50
72.812
33.48
SARMS 4
High organics
High metals
55.938
6.50
72.818
3.348
a Quantities presented are based on a 1,000-lb batch size, e.g., to prepare 1,000 Ibs of SARMS 1, the
respective quantities shown will be added to (1,000 Ibs minus the mass of contaminants) of soil.
Liquid metal mix weights do not include water.
-------
Additive No. 4, the liquid organic mixture, will be prepared by first
combining the appropriate amounts of acetone, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and
styrene, composed of ethylbenzene, chlorobenzene, xylene, dichloroethane,
perch!oroethane, and pentachlorophenol will be prepared and then added to the
first properties. Again, the quantities of each ingredient that will be used
to prepare each mixture are shown in Table 2-4.
Table 3-2 presents the quantity of each additive that will be blended
with the soil to prepare the four different SARM samples in 1,000-lb batch
quantities.
3.1.2 Preparation of SARM Samples
A total of 28,000 Ibs (28 batches) of SARM samples will be prepared over
th course of the full-scale blending operation. For every SARM batch that is
prepared, the appropriate quantities of each of the four additives (see Table
3-2) will be measured out from their respective bulk batches. The designated
quantities of the liquid additives will be transferred into the appropriate
contaminant application units which will be attached to the inside of the
mortar mixer located in the building. The designated quantities of the two
solid additives will be manually added to the mixer. The following order
will be followed for the SARMS preparation:
1. SARMS 4 (Hi/Hi) - prepare one 1,000-lb batch
3. SARMS 2 (Lo/Lo) - prepare 13 1,000-lb batches
4. SARMS 1 (Hi/Lo) - prepare 13 1,000-lb batches
2. SARMS 3 (Lo/Hi) - prepare one 1,000-lb batch
The total quantity of SARM samples to be blended is different than the total
quantity to be shipped to the BOAT'S and archive location. Twenty-eight
thousand pounds (28,000 Ibs) will be blended, however, only 27,000 Ibs will
be packaged and shipped out for BOAT testing and archiving. The remaining
E-17
-------
TABLE 3-1. PREMIX FORMULAS
Additive components
SARM 1 SARM 2 SARM 3 SARM 4
13,000 Ibs 13,000 Ibs l,000blbs 1,000 Ibs
soil soil soil soil
Additive No. 1
Arsenic trioxide (As203)
Lead sulfate (PbSOj
Zinc oxide (ZnO)
Additive No. 2
Cadmium sulfate (3Cd SO^'SH^)
Nickel nitrate [Ni(N03)2'6H20]
Copper sulfate (CuSOJ
Chrome nitrate [Cr(N03)3'9H20]
Water
AddUive No. 3
Anthracene
Additive No. 4
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethy1ene
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Styrene
Pentachlorophenol
Bis(2-ethyhexyl)phthalate
a Amount of pre-mix shown is sufficient to prepare 13 1000-lb batches of
SARM.
Amount of pre-mix shown 1s sufficient to prepare one 1000-lb batch of SARM.
E-16
-------
chemical additive. These four additives, as they will be referred to, are as
follows:
Additive No. 1 - A dry mixture of insoluble metal powders consisting of
arsenic trioxide (As203), lead sulfate (PbSOtJ, and zinc oxide (ZnO).
Additive No. 2 - Anthracene in solid form.
Additive No. 3 - An aqueous solution of nickel nitrate [Ni(N03)2'6H20)],
copper sulfate (CuS
-------
3.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF FULL-SCALE SARMS BLENDING OPERATIONS
The following section discusses the implementation of the SARMS blending
operation.
3.1 SARMS BLENDING PROCEDURES
The chemicals that will be used during the full-scale SARMS blending
operations are presently being stored in a flammable materials storage vault
located at the Center Hill facility (see Figure 2-1). When handling the
chemicals, appropriate personal protective gear will be used and precautions
will be taken to limit the potential for spills of chemicals during their
transfer from one area of the facility to another (see Sections 3.4 and 4.0).
The full-scale SARMS blending operation will proceed in a sequence of
well-defined steps. These steps are as follows:
1. For each SARM, prepare pre-mix solution or mixtures of contaminants
to be added to each batch.
2. Determine quantities of pre-mix solution/mixture that will be added
to make a 1,000-1b batch of SARM.
3. Blend a total of 28 1,000-1b batches of SARM samples.
4. Blend first batch of soil and chemicals, collecting samples from
the first batch to confirm that target contaminant levels were met,
and determine the mixing time for all subsequent batches.
The following subsections discuss, in detail, each of the steps listed
above.
3.1.1 Pre-mixing of Chemicals
As determined during the bench-scale SARMS blending activities, chem-
icals will be pre-mixed to form three contaminant mixtures and one, single
E-14
-------
This determination will be based on the results of a series of sample anal-
yses to be conducted on samples collected from Batch No. 1 at designated time
intervals. .Samples will be collected (during mixing of the first batch only)
after 6 minutes and 12 minutes of mixing following addition of organic con-
taminants to determine the mixing time needed to obtain a homogenous mixture.
Six samples will be collected after 6 minutes of mixing and analyzed for lead
(Pb) and copper (Cu). Another six samples will be collected after 12 minutes
of mixing and analyzed for Pb and Cu. The criteria for acceptance or rejec-
tion for each sample set will be based on the following F test:
sh 2
F- -J-
w
If the F values exceed 4.96 (a = .05) the batch will be mixed for
another 6 minutes and the F test repeated using the 12-minute and 18-minute
analytical results. This technique will ensure that the mixing of SARMS will
be of sufficient length to obtain a homogenous mixture. The mixing time
determined during preparation of Batch No. 1 will then be used for the blend-
ing of all subsequent batches. Sampling and analysis will not be conducted
to determine homogeneity between different batches due to logistical and
budget restraints.
E-13
-------
TABLE 2-4. FULL-SCALE CHEMICAL QUANTITIES
rv>
Quantity
SARMS 1
high organics
SARMS 2
low organics
SARMS 3
low organics
SARMS 4
high organics
Chemical
Volatile*
Ethyl benzene
Xyl*ne
1,2-01 chloroethane
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethylene
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Styrene
Sem1-Volat1les
Anthracene
Pentachlorophenol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Metals
Lead (PbSOu-PbO)
Zinc (ZnO) h
Cadmium (3CdSO^»8H20)D
Arsenic (As203) .
Copper (CuS04-5H,0)D .
Chromium [Cr(N03)3.9H2p]D
Nickel [Ni(N03)2.6H20]D
low metals
13,000 Ibs
49.92
127.92
13.03
10.92
154.70
7.28
13.00
84.50
13.00
45.50
\
5.54
8.74
0.77
0.26
13.61
3.00
1.54
low metals
13,000 Ibs
4.99
12.79
1.30
1.09
15.47
0.73
1.30
8.45
1.30
4.55
5.54
8.74
0.77
0.26
13.61
3.00
1.54
high metals
1,000 Ibs
0.38
0.98
0.10
0.08
1.19
0.05
0.10
0.65
0.10
0.35
21.32
33.62
2.96
0.99
52.36
11.55
5.94
high metals
1,000 Ibs
3.84
9.84
1.00
0.84
11.90
0.55
0.99
6.50
0.99
3.50
21.32
33.62
2.96
0.99
52.36
11.55
5.94
Total
quantity
59.13
151.53
15.43
12.93
183.26
8.61
15.39
100.1
15.39
53.9
53.72
135.82
7.46
2.50
131.94
29.10
14.96
a
All quantities are in pounds,
Water-soluble metal salts.
-------
TABLE 2-3. TARGET HIGH AND LOW CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS
FOR SARM SAMPLES
Contaminant
Volatile*
Ethyl benzene
Xylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethylene
Acetone
Chlorobenzene
Styrene
Proportions
(%)
15
39
3
3
33
2
5
High (ppm)
3,200
8,200
600
600
6,800
400
1,000
Low (ppm)
320
820
60
60
680
40
100
100
20,800
2,080
Semivolatiles
Anthracene
PCP
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)Phthalate
65
10
25
6,500
1,000
2,500
650
100
250
100
10,000
1,000
Metals
Lead (Pb)
Zinc (Zn)
Cadmium (Cd)
Arsenic (As)
Copper (Cu)
Chromium (Cr)
Nickel (Ni)
28
45
2
1
19
3
2
14,000
22,500
1,000
500
9,500
1,500
1,000
280
450
20
10
190
30
30
100
50,000
1,000
E-ll
-------
2.2.3 SARMS Blending Equipment Design
The various SARMS will be mixed using a 16-ft3 capacity STONE mortar
mixer. This mixer has been modified by replacing the grate cover with a
custom-fabricated solid cover and replacing the standard motor with a 5-
horsepower explosion-proof electric motor. The cover will be hinged to allow
for the transfer of soils into and from the mixer, from and into 55- and
5-gallon drums and pails. A liquid contaminant application unit consisting
of a stainless steel tube-manifold will be fabricated and attached to the
inside of the custom cover to allow the addition of liquid contaminants
directly to the soil in the mixer without opening the cover. This manifold
will be attached to a liquid reservoir by a non-reactive tube with an in-line
flow control valve. The mixer will be located inside the building and a fume
hood will be constructed around the mixer that will collect fugitive vapors
being released from the mixture during mixing and emptying operations.
2.2.4 Determination of Full-Scale Chemical Quantities
Table 2-3 indicates the target high and low contaminant concentrations
for the SARM samples. Table 2-4 presents the quantities of each chemical
that will be added to make each 1,000-1b batch of the four SARM samples.
These quantities have been determined utilizing analytical results of SARM
samples prepared during bench-scale research. Section 3.1 discusses the
various mixtures of chemicals that will be prepared and then added to the
soil, and the specific blending procedures that will be followed over the
course of the full-scale operation.
2.2.5 Determination of SARMS Mixing Time
The mixing time required to achieve a homogenous blend of soil and
chemicals will be determined during the preparation of the first SARM batch.
E-10
-------
TABLE 2-2. EQUIPMENT LIST FOR FULL-SCALE SARMS BLENDING
16-ft STONE mortar mixer with explosion-proof motor
Activated carbon filter (air purification)
1200-cfs blower and field-fabricated fume hood (vented to carbon filter)
CASE 1835 front-end loader (outside drum handling)
125-gm capacity electronic scale
Assorted graduated cylinders, syringes and burrettes
An assortment of tools, shovels and trowels
Paper towels and laboratory wipes
Bulk chemical absorbent
HydroLift (inside drum handling)
Cascade air-line supplied air system (two-man)3
PPV full-face, air-line respirators with back-up (hip air)a
Tyvec coveralls3
Viton and butyl rubber gloves and glove liners
Disposable boot covers3
Empty 55-gallon open-head steel drums and lids (SARMS packaging)
Empty 5-gallon steel pails and lids (SARMS packaging)
Empty 0.5-gallon glass containers with teflon-lined lids (SARMS packaging)
Sample jars with teflon-lined lids
33-mm camera and video recording camera
Site intercom and telephone communications equipment
Fire extinguishers (2)
3 Health and safety procedures and equipment are discussed, in detail, in
Section 4.0.
E-9
-------
2.2.1 SARMS Blending Site Layout
A plan-view drawing of the full-scale SARMS blending site is shown in
Figure 2-1. Locations noted on this drawing include; access road and drive-
way, blending building, clean and contaminated soil staging area (drums),
chemical storage vault, emergency eye-wash and shower, remote power center,
and general facility laboratories. Figure 2-2 shows the anticipated floor
plan and activity area within the blending building, subject to modification
during the mixing activity.
2.2.2 SARMS Blending Equipment Requirements
The equipment necessary to complete the full-scale SARM blending opera-
tion is presented in Table 2-2. This list may expand as necessary to address
actual conditions encountered during blending.
In addition to the listed equipment, a temporary building will be erect-
ed to be used during blending activities for both containment of fugitive
emissions of chemical contaminants, as well as protection from the elements.
Electric power to this building will be provided by explosion-proof wiring
inspected and approved by Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. Work tables and
storage areas for equipment and supplies. The wooden floor will be covered
by smooth-vinyl flooring; all seams will be sealed to prevent contaminant
migration to flooring beneath and protective sheathing will be placed over
the vinyl to protect 1t from physical damage by drums and drum-handling A
large (8-ft wide) sliding door which will be fitted to the building to allow
easy passage of drums and equipment into and out from the blending area, will
also provide auxiliary replacement air (for ventilation system) and easy
egress under emergency situations.
E-8
-------
The clean soil mixing operation will take place at the Oeder Sand and
Gravel Company in Morrow, Ohio and will involve the mixing of two 15,000-lb
batches of clean soil. For each 15,000-lb batch, half of the quantity of
each soil component shown in Table 2-1, will be weighed using an industrial -
size scale and placed in a large 6-yd cement mixer. The soil components
will then be mixed for approximately one hour. Once the clean soil matrix is
thoroughly mixed, it will be weighed out into 500-lb batches and placed in 60
epoxy-lined, 55-gallon steel drums. Forty-eight of these containers will be
used later during Phase II to transport SARM samples to the J. Zink incinera-
tion facility.
During the clean soil packaging process, representative samples will be
collected for analysis to confirm homogeneity, and the physical and chemical
characteristics of the soil mix. Ten (10) samples will be collected for
cation exchange capacity (CEC) analysis to confirm the CEC of the overall
soil mixture, and the homogeneity of the mix. Six (6) samples will be col-
lected to confirm the physical characteristics of the soil. Analyses will
include grain size distribution, TOC, pH, and mineralogy. Lastly, a single
sample will be collected for a hazardous substance list (HSL) analysis to
identify any contaminants that may be present in the soil prior to the SARMS
blending operation. A more complete discussion of proposed full-scale sam-
pling and analysis is provided in Section 3.1.3.
2.2 PHASE 2 - BLENDING OF SARM SAMPLES
Phase 2 of the full-scale operation involves the blending of various
levels of chemicals with the soil matrix to formulate the four different SARM
blends. Phase 2 will be conducted at the U.S. EPA's Center Hill Research
Facility in Cincinnati, Ohio.
E-7
-------
2.0 FULL-SCALE OPERATIONS DESIGN
The following section discusses the design of the two phases of the
full-scale operation.
2.1 PHASE 1 - MIXING OF CLEAN SOIL MATRIX
A total of 30,000 Ibs of soil matrix components will be mixed together
to form the soil that will be used for the preparation of the SARM samples.
Table 2-1 indicates the source and quantity of each soil component that will
i
be used in the full-scale soil mixing.
TABLE 2-1. SOIL COMPONENT QUANTITIES FOR FULL-SCALE
Soil component
Gravel (No. 9)
Sand
Silt
Clay
- Bentonite
- Kaolinite
Topsoil
Quantity3
(Ibs)
1,710
9,450
8,490
1,620
2,820
5,940
30,030
Source/location
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co. /Morrow, OH
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co. /Morrow, OH
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co. /Morrow, OH
American Colloid Co./Skoky, IL
Charles B. Chrystal & Co. /Brooklyn, NYC
Oeder Sand & Gravel Co. /Morrow, OH
a Quantities based on the following recipe using volume percentages:
gravel - 5%; sand-- 20*; silt - 25%; topsoil - 20%; bentonite clay - 7.5%;
kaolinite clay - 22.5%. Equivalent weight percentages are: gravel - 5.7%;
sand - 31.47%; silt - 28.29%; bentonite clay - 5.37%; kaolinite clay -
9.35%; topsoil - 19.81%. Recipe finalized by peer review committee on
6/16/87.
b Actual source of bentonite is Mississippi.
c Actual source of kaolinite is Georgia.
E-6
-------
TABLE 1-1, QUANTITIES OF SARM SAMPLES TO BE BLENDED
FOR BOAT'S AND ARCHIVE STORAGE
BOAT
Incineration
Stabilization
Thermal desorption
Chemical treatment
Physical treatment
Archive
Other reserve
Totals
(SARMS 1)
High
organics,
low metals
(Ibs)
12.000
100
50
50
50
500
250
13,000
(SARMS 2)
Low
organics,
low metals
(Ibs)
12,000
100
50
50
50
500
250
13,000
(SARMS 3)
Low
organics
high metals
(Ibs)
0
100
50
50
50
500
250
1000
(SARMS 4)
High
organics
high metals
(Ibs)
0
100
50
50
50
500
250
1000
1.2 SUMMARY OF APPROACH
The full-scale operations will be conducted in two phases:
0 Phase I - Mixing of Clean Soil Matrix
0 Phase II - Blending of SARM Samples
Phase I, which will include mixing a total of 30,000 Ibs of soil components
into a homogeneous soil mix, will be completed at the Oeder Sand and Gravel
Company, located in Morrow, Ohio. The clean soil mix will then be packaged
and shipped to EPA's Center Hill Research Facility located in Cincinnati,
Ohio where Phase II will be conducted. Phase II will entail the actual
blending of the four SARM samples and will be completed over a ong-wgek
period. The following sections describe, in detail, the procedures and
equipment that will be followed and used, respectively, over the course of
the full-scale operation.
E-5
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This procedures plan is prepared as part of Work Assignment 7, Task 1
under U.S. EPA, Land Pollution Control Division Contract No. 68-03-3413.
Task 1 involves the formulation of standard analytical reference matrix
(SARM) samples to be used in the development of best demonstrated available
technology (BOAT) treatment levels for soil and debris wastes from CERCLA
site response actions. This procedures plan presents a detailed description
of PEI's approach for conducting the full-scale SARMS blending operation.
1.1 OBJECTIVE
The objective of the full-scale SARMS blending operation is to prepare
pre-designated quantities of each of the following four SARM samples for five
EPA-selected BDAT's:
1. High levels of organics (20,000 ppm volatiles plus 10,000 ppm
semi-volatiles) and low levels of metals (1,000 ppm total metals).
2. Low levels of organics (2,000 ppm volatiles plus 1,000 ppm semi-
volatiles) and low levels of metals (1,000 ppm total metals).
3. Low levels of organics (2,000 ppm volatiles plus 1,000 ppm semi-
volatiles) and high levels of metals (a number of different metals
would be represented with a total concentration of 50,000 ppm).
4. High levels of organics (20,000 ppm volatiles plus 10,000 ppm
semi-volatiles) and high levels of metals (a number of different
metals would be represented with a total concentration of 50,000
ppm).
In addition to samples being prepared for the technologies, SARMS will also
be prepared and packaged for storage in a selected archive location. Table 1-1
presents the quantity of each SARM sample blend that will be prepared
delivered to each technology and to the archive storage location.
E-4
-------
FIGURES
Number
2-1
2-2
4-1
Plan View of SARMS Blending Site
Floor Plan of Blending Building
Site Plan
Page
2-4
2-5
4-2
Number
1-1
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
4-1
4-2
TABLES
Quantities of SARM Samples to be Blended for BOAT'S
and Archive Storage
Soil Component Quantities for Full-Scale
Equipment List for Full-Scale SARMS Blending
Target High and Low Contaminant Concentrations for
SARM Samples
Full-Scale Chemical Quantities
Additive Component and Bulk Quantities
Full-Scale Additive Quantities for SARMS Preparation
Summary of Proposed Analytical Work
Page
1-2
2-1
2-6
2-8
2-9
3-3
3-5
3-7
Locations, Quantities, and Transportation of SARM Samples 3-10
Emergency Medical Information
List of Environmental Monitoring Equipment
4-5
4-8
E-3
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Figures and Tables iii
1.0 Introduction 1-1
1.1 Objective 1-1
1.2 Summary of Approach 1-2
2.0 Full-Scale Operations Design 2-1
2.1 Phase 1 - Mixing of Clean Soil Matrix 2-1
2.2 Phase 2 - Blending of SARM Samples 2-2
3.0 Implementation of Full-Scale Operations 3-1
3.1 SARMS Blending Procedures 3-1
3.2 SARMS Packaging and Shipping 3-9
3.3 Waste Handling Practices 3-11
3.4 Chemical Release Prevention and Response Procedures 3-12
4.0 Health and Safety Procedures and Requirements 4-1
4.1 Onsite Control 4-1
4.2 Site Plan 4-1
4.3 Personnel Health and Safety Training 4-3
4.4 Medical Surveillance 4-3
4.5 Emergency Equipment Locations 4-3
4.6 Emergency Medical Information 4-4
4.7 Emergency Contacts 4-4
4.8 Environmental Monitoring 4-4
4.9 Protective Equipment 4-7
4.10 Field Operating Procedures 4-7
4.11 Decontamination Procedures 4-7
4.12 Emergency Procedures 4-9
5.0 QA/QC Procedures 5-1
Attachment A A-l
E-2
-------
APPENDIX E
PROCEDURES PLAN FOR FULL-SCALE
SARM PREPARATION
by
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246-0100
Contract No. 68-03-3413
Work Assignment No. 0-7
PN 3741-7-1
Task 1, Subtask 1.10
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
26 Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
R. Traver, Technical Project Monitor
E. Harris, Project Officer
June 1987
E-l
-------
LEE WAN 4 ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatilc Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Digestion Blank
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-Q2792301-PB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
IMA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
NA
NA
NA
% Surrogate Recovery
% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.15
0.04
0.01
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Digestion Blank
Lab Ref . I.D.
708CMJ2792401-PB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethe»ne
Tetrachloroetherie
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
IMA
MA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophonol
Terphenyl-dl4
NA
NA
NA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.15
0.04
0.01
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics. Metals
EPA Contract tf 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Spiked Blank Duplicate
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-Q1792403-SBD
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrone
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recavery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.04 46X Rec
0.108 100X Rec
0.14 105X Rec
RPD = 27X
RPD = 10X
RPD = IX
96X Surrogate Recovery
114X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Spiked Blank
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-Q1792402-SB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
MA
MA
NA
NA
MA
NA
MA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-T ribromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
35
121
138
35% Rec
110% Rec
104% Rec
86% Surrogate Recovery
110% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organic*, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Extraction Blank
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-Q1792401-ExB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrcne
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-d!4
0.05 U,J-Calibration Problem
0.02 U
0.02 U
80X Surrogate Recovery
69X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Load
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organic*, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Extraction Blank
Lab Ref. I.D. ft: 7080-01792201-ExB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
WA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
WA X Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1
Terphenyl-d!4
0.04 U,J-Calibration Problem
0.02 U
0.02 U
56% Surrogate Recovery
61X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16. 1987
Sample Name. Extraction Blank
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-Q1791501-£xB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzone
Ethyl Benzene
Styrone
Xylenes (Total)
Toluen?-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
IMA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-T ri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.06 U,J-Calibration Problem
0.02 U
0.02 U
63% Surrogate Recovery
94X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology. Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Extraction Blank
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-01791403-ExB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.06 U,J-Calibration Problem
0.02 U
0.02 U
54% Surrogate Recovery
103% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
•^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: Extraction Blank
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-Q1791101-ExB
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
IMA
NA
MA
NA
A/A
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.05 U,J-Calibration Problem
0.02 U
0.02 U,J-Calibration Problem
63X Surrogate Recovery
59X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic3, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract it 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP SV/M Blank
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-^1790201-LF1B
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
MA
MA
NA
NA
NA
MA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
•
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.04 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
69% Surrogate Recovery
81% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics. Semivolatile Organics. Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP SV/M Blank
Lab Kef. I.D. #: 7080-Q1783101-LF1B
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrcne
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol 0.06
Anthracene 0.02
8is(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate O.02
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1 48
Terphenyl-dl4 66
U,J-Calibration Problem
U
U
X Surrogate Recovery
X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
7.inc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics. Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 66523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP - SV/M Blank
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP SV/M Blank
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-Q1782601-LF1B
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6—Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.03 U,J-Calibration Problem
0.03 U
0.01 U,J-Calibration Problem
72% Surrogate Recovery
52X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP-Volatiles Blank
Lab Ref. I.D. ft: 7080-TCLPBLK3-1
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1.2-Oichloroethane-d4
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
0.02
0.01
0.05
O.05
0.14
0,01
0.34
U
U
U
100% Surrogate Recovery
100% Surrogate Recovery
113% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
IMA
IMA
MA
IMA % Surrogate Recovery
MA % Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
Nfl
NA
Nft
NA
NA
•^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP-Volatiles Blank
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-TCLPBLK2-1
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chloroberizene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrone
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.16
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.04
U
U
U
95X Surrogate Recovery
104X Surrogate Recovery
88% Surrogate Recovery
Sernivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol NA
Anthracene NA
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate NA
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1 NA
Terphenyl-dl4 NA
X Surrogate Recovery
X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP-Volatiles Blank
Lab Ref. 1.0. 0: 7080-TCLPBLK1-1
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
0.37
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.34
0.06
0.80
H
L,H
L,H
,H
108X Surrogate Recovery
104% Surrogate Recovery
96X Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2.4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
NA
NA
NA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
MA % Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: TCLP-Volatiles Blank
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-TCLPBLK C-4
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylene, ortho
Toluone-dS
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
NF
U
U
U
U
U
U
9IX Surrogate Recovery
102X Surrogate Recovery
110X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract it 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name:_ T/HMHO/R2/60 (extraction duplicate)
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708039 D
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
IMA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol 4.54
Anthracene 0.71
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 0.63
2,4,6-Tribromophenol D
Terphenyl-dl4 D
J RPD =
U diff.:
U diff.:
61%
0 mg/L
0 mg/L
X Surrogate Recovery
X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name. T/HMHO/R2/60 Date Received: 8/13/87
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708039
Extraction duplicate performed for semi-volatiles; see next page for results
Result
Compound (mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone 1.40
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.21
Tetrachloroethene ' 1.90
Chlorobenzene 1.50
Ethyl Benzene 15.0
Styrene 4.20
Xylenes (Total) 36.0
Toluene-d8 ' 98,97% Surrogate Recovery
Bromofluorobenzene 103,97% Surrogate Recovery
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol 8.50 E,J-Calibration Problem
Anthracene 0.01 L
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 0.21 U
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1 24% Surrogate Recovery
Terphenyl-dl4 37% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic 5.81
Cadmium 10.6
Chromium 0.65
Copper 118.4
Lead 151.3
Nickel 12.2
Zinc 165.6
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPft Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R2/10-60 (extraction duplicate)
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708038 D
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
i
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.66 J diff.:
0.01 J diff.:
0.18 U diff.:
0.14 mg/L
0 mg/L
0 mg/L
4% Surrogate Recovery
32X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R2/60 (TCLP duplicate)
Lab Ref. l.D. #: 7080-8708038 LD
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.33
0.02
0.11
0.11
1.06
0.24
2.80
diff.= 0.34 mg/L
L diff .= 0.01 mg/L
diff.= 0.02 mg/L
diff .= 0.02 mg/L
RPD = 14%
diff.= 0.01 mg/L
RPD = 24%
105% Surrogate Recovery
97% Surrogate Recovery
102% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
% Surrogate Recovery
% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semi volatile Organ ics. Metals
EPA Contract ti 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523 x
\
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R2/ 10-60 Date Received: 8/13/87
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708038
TCLP duplicate performed for volatiles and extraction duplicate performed for
semi-volatiles; see next two pages for results
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-dB
Bromof luorobenzene
1 ,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.67
0.01 L
0.09
0.09
0.92
0.23
2.20
95% Surrogate Recovery
100% Surrogate Recovery
94% Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexy l)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribrotnophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.52 J-Calibration Problem
0.25 U
0.22 U
11% Surrogate Recovery
34% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
1.91
5.54
0.01
9.88
4.59
2.52
136.9
U
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology:
Final Report •
Washing (PEI Associates)
October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R2/10
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708037
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene •
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-0ichloroethane-d4
0.78
0.04 L
0.03 L
0.07
0.50
0.14
1.20
95X Surrogate Recovery
103X Surrogate Recovery
97X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2.4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-d!4
0.37 E,J-Calibration Problem
0.01 J-Identification Uncertain
0.10 U
26X Surrogate Recovery
47X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.75
1.62
0.01 U
1.61
0.40
0.99
41.0
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract ft 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Mashing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R3/60
Lab Ref. I.D. H: 7080-8708036
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.10 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.10
0.02 L
0.23
98% Surrogate Recovery
101% Surrogate Recovery
93% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.61 J-Calibration Problem
0.01 L
0.02 J-Identification Uncertain
47% Surrogate Recovery
86% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.60
1.17
0.80
7.15
4.53
0.92
38.4
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Mashing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Wame: T/LMLO/R3/10-60 (TCLP duplicate)
Lab Ref. I.D. ft: 7080-8708035 LD
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.24 RPD :
0.01 L diff.:
0.02 J diff.;
16X
0 mg/L
0 mg/L
50X Surrogate Recovery
79X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmiu*
ChromiuM
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R3/10-60 Date Received: 8/13/87
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708035
TCLP performed in duplicate for semi-volatiles; see next page for results
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.10
0.05 U
0.02 L
0.05 U
0.25
0.07
0.64
102X Surrogate Recovery
103% Surrogate Recovery
99X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.21 J-Calibration Problem
0.02 L
0.02 J-Identification Uncertain
48% Surrogate Recovery
90% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15 U
0.23
0.01 U
0.10
0.15
0.09
3.77
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Sernivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology:
Final Report •
Washing (PEI Associates)
October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R3/10
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708034
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.10 U
0.05 U
0.01
0.02
0.17
0.05
0.40
98X Surrogate Recovery
99X Surrogate Recovery
98% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.04
0.01
0.01
J-Identification Uncertain
61% Surrogate Recovery
8IX Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15 U
0.03
0.01 U
0.05 U
0.15 U
0.12
0.11
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R2/60
Lab Ref. I.D. ft: 7080-8708033
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.10 U
0.05 U
0.02
0.02
0.24
0.06
0.55
99% Surrogate Recovery
99% Surrogate Recovery
97% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.24
0.02
0.02
L
U
61% Surrogate Recovery
88% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0
0
0
4
2
0
11
.15 U
.17
.53
.12
.32
.73
.7
*Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology:
Final Report •
Washing (PEI Associates)
October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R2/10-60
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708032
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.10 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.06
0.05 U
0.15
100X Surrogate Recovery
103% Surrogate Recovery
95% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-d!4
0.16
0.02
0.03
J-identification uncertain
6IX Surrogate Recovery
74% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15 U
0.07
0.01 U
0.12
0.15 U
0.11
0.75
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, totals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Untreated (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: HMHO - SARM IV
Lab Ref. I.D. ft: 7080-8708029
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone 130
1,2-0ichloroethane 13
Tetrachloroethene 4.5
Chlorobenzene 6.7
Ethyl Benzene 47
Styrene 11
Xylenes (Total) 100
Toluene-d8 ' 100,100%
Bromofluorobenzene 101, 97%
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 109X
Surrogate Recovery
Surrogate Recovery
Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1 3.8
Anthracene 3.4
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 3.0
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1 D
Terphenyl-dl4 D
J-Calibration Problem
U
U
X Surrogate Recovery
X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
9.58
35.3
0.06
159.9
70.4
26.8
395.9
Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract ft 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16. 1987
Sample Name: HMLO - SARM III
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708028
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
7.10
0.50
0.33
0.38
4.60
0.50
11.00
U
L
L
99% Surrogate Recovery
99X Surrogate Recovery
109% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.34 J-Low Surrogate Recovery
0.01 L
0.09 U
DX Surrogate Recovery
21X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
6.39
33.1
0.01 U
80.7
19.9
17.5
358.5
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic*, Samivolatile Organic*, Metals
EPA Contract * 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Untreated (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: LMLO - SARM II
Lab Ref. I.D. It: 7080-8708027
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/R«mark
Volatile Organic* (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.92
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.12
0.03
0.30
U
U
U
102% Surrogate Recovery
99X Surrogate Recovery
111% Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
•
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.90
0.01 L
0.22 U
OX Surrogate Recovery
46X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.73
0.01
0.89
0.70
0.40
14.6
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract ft 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Untreated (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16. 1987
Sample Name: LMHO - SARM I (TCLP duplicate)
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708026 LD
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentach loropheno 1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexy l)phthalate
2,4, 6-Tr i bromopheno 1
Terphenyl-dl4
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
7.8
2.6
2.3
0
0
0.15
0.55
0.01
0.64
0.49
0.28
9.2
RPO = 3X
U diff .= 0 mg/L
U diff.= 0 mg/L
X Surrogate Recovery
X Surrogate Recovery
U diff .= 0 mg/L
RPO = 4X
U diff .= 0 mg/L
RPO = 5X
diff .= 0 mg/L
diff.= 0.01 mg/L
RPO = OX
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organica, Semivolatile Organics. Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: LMHO - SARM I Date Received: 8/13/87
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708026
TCLP performed in duplicate for semi-violatiles/metals: see nest page for
results
Compound
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-0ichloroethane-d4
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
110
76
3.3
5.2
27
9.0
62
100, 97% Surrogate Recovery
100,101% Surrogate Recovery
108% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
7.6 J-Calibration Problem
0.07 L
0.10 L
18% Surrogate Recovery
42% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.53
0.01
0.61
0.49
0.27
9.2
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology:
Final Report
Mashing (PEI Associates)
October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R3/60
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708025
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
1.00
0.06
0.64
0.54
40
40
5
1
12.00
100, 99%
103,101%
93%
Surrogate Recovery
Surrogate Recovery
Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalata
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
2.07 E
0.30
5.5
OX Surrogate Recovery
52% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.36
0.70
0.74
3.60
1.06
0.73
15.4
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics. Metals
EPA Contract It 68-03-3393 LWA Projact 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16. 1987
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R3/100-60 (TCLP duplicate)
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708024 LO
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.20
0.05
0.07
0.10
0.88
0.22
2.40
diff.= 0.45 mg/L
U diff .= 0 mg/L
diff .= 0.03 mg/L
diff .= 0.02 mg/L
diff .= 0.09 mg/L
diff .= 0.03 mg/L
RPO = 9X
100% Surrogate Recovery
96% Surrogate Recovery
101% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
NA
NA
NA
NA % Surrogate Recovery
NA % Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract H 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Mashing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Date Received: 8/13/87
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R3/10-60
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708024
TCLP performed in duplicate for volatiles; see next page for results
Digestion spike performed for metals
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.65
0.03
0.10
0.12
0.97
0.25
2.20
100% Surrogate Recovery
100X Surrogate Recovery
91% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol 0.41
Anthracene 0.02
8is(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 0.10
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
L
U
D X Surrogate Recovery
52X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.26
0.01
0.18
0.15
0.06
1.90
U X Rec.= 94
X R«c.= 82
U X Rec.= 88
X Rec.= 87
U X Rec.= 84
X R«c.= 85
X Rec.= 72
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organic*, totals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LUA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16. 1987
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R3/10
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708023
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(rog/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-0ichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
1.80
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.44
0.13
1.00
L
L
102% Surrogate Recovery
100X Surrogate Recovery
99X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tr i brornopheno 1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.04 L
0.01 L
0.10 U
OX Surrogate Recovery
40X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846. Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.05
0.12
0.01
0.06
0.15
0.04
0.85
U
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Scmivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract H 68-03-3393 LWA Projact 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R3/60
Lab Ref. 1.0. tt: 7080-8708022
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
1.50
0.05 L
0.18
0.17
2.00
0.46
5.00
104,101% Surrogate Recovery
100,100% Surrogate Recovery
95% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol 1.24
Anthracene 0.11
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 0.10
2,4,6-Tri bromophenol
Terph«nyl-dl4
U
13% Surrogate Recovery
81% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadniu*
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
12.8
25.2
2.19
192.0
13.4
21.95
412.8
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, totals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R3/10-60
Lab Kef. I.D. #: 7080-8708021
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1.2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.81
0.04
0.08
0.10
0.78
0.22
1.80
99% Surrogate Recovery
101% Surrogate Recovery
101% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatilc Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2.4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
1.28 J-Calibration Problem
0.01 L
0.10 U,J-Calibration Problem
D% Surrogate Recovery
33% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
2.91
9.60
0.25
15.06
28.79
2.73
150.0
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semiwolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R3/10
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708020
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1.80
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.12
0.03
0.23
L
U
L
101X Surrogate Recovery
97% Surrogate Recovery
95X Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.05 J-Calibration problem
0.11 U,J-Low Surrogate Recovery
0.11 U.J-Low Surrogate Recovery
OX Surrogate Recovery
28% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-i46, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.97
4.87
0.01
1.94
0.50
1.06
42.5
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
V
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Samivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMLO/R2/60
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708019
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organic* (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.25
0.05 U
0.03
0.02
0.19
0.06
0.55
95,103% Surrogate Recovery
104,96% Surrogate Recovery
102% Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organic* (SW-846, Method 8270)
i
Pentachlorophenol 0.27
Anthracene > 0.01
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 0.02
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
U
U,J-Internal Standard Area High
25% Surrogate Recovery
34% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
8.12
5.1
1.16
52.6
64.8
8.6
216.4
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract ft 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMLO/R2/10-60
Lab Ref. I.D. ft: 7080-8708018
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.25
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.25
0.06
0.73
U
L
L
99X Surrogate Recovery
95X Surrogate Recovery
104% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.40 E,J-Poor Surrogate Recovery
0.01 L
0.05 U
3% Surrogate Recovery
54X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-146, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.55
2.15
0.01
1.39
1.56
0.94
26.8
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organ!cs, Metals
EPA Contract * 68-03-3393 LUA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMLO/R1/60
Lab Ref. I.D, #: 7080-8708017
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.40
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.32
0.09
0.90
U
L
L
104% Surrogate Recovery
98% Surrogate Recovery
102% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalata
2,4,6-Tri bromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
2.20 E,J-Poor Surrogate Recoveries
0.04 J-Poor Surrogate Recoveries
0.02 U,J-Poor Surrogate Recoveries
- % Surrogate Recovery
29% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846. Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
8.00
19.16
0.03
144.0
19.85
18.5
320.1
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic*, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMLO/R1/10-60
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708016
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethan«-d4
6.10
0.31
0.89
.10
,50
.80
1.
9,
2
30.00
103,100% Surrogate Recovery
101,100% Surrogate Recovery
109, 93X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2.4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.93 J-Calibration Problem
0.01 L
0.02 U
19X Surrogate Recovery
531 Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
1.75
7.79
0.04
6.39
11.67
1.56
52.9
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic*, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract H 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMLO/R1/10
Lab Ref. I.D. *: 7080-8708015
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-0ichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.45
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.10
H
U,H
U,H
U,H
L,H
U,H
H
105X Surrogate Recovery
107% Surrogate Recovery
104X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.17
0.01
0.02
L
U
57% Surrogate Recovery
105% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.86
4.95
0.01
1.32
6.46
1.26
50.0
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R1/60
Lab Ref. I.0. #: 7080-8708014
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1.2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.62
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.16
0.04
0.45
H
U,H
U,H
L.H
H
L,
H
H
104% Surrogate Recovery
103X Surrogate Recovery
10IX Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
1.5 J-Calibration Problem
2.1 U
0.2 L
DX Surrogate Recovery
OX Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.93
0.01
1.87
1.05
0.39
10.7
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organ!cs, Semivolatile Organic*, Metals
EPA Contract * 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16. 1987
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R1/10-60 (TCLP duplicate)
Lab Ref. I.D. tt: 7080-8708013 LD
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-<14
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
17
05
06
07
70
16
80
diff.
U diff.
diff.
diff.
diff.
diff.
diff.
=
=
=
=
=
=
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.57
mg/L
mg/L
.04
.03
.37
.06
.89
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
104% Surrogate Recovery
97X Surrogate Recovery
98X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
1.12 RPO = 6%
0.42 diff. = 0.32 mg/L
0.06 L diff. = 0.03 mg/L
OX Surrogate Recovery
53X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.39
0.01
0.21
0.10
0.10
2.78
U diff.
RPO
U diff.
diff.
diff.
diff.
RPD
= 0 mg/L
= 3X
= 0 mg/L
= 0.07 mg/L
= 0.12 mg/L
= 0.01 mg/L
= 16%
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic*, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract ft 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Mashing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R1/10-60 Date Received: 8/13/87
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708013
TCLP performed in duplicate for volatiles and semi-volatiles/metals; see next
page for results .
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromof1uorobenzene
1,2-Oichloro«than«-d4
0.74
0.05
0.02
0.04
0.33
0.10
0.91
H
U,H
L,H
L.H
H
H
H
107% Surrogate Recovery
109X Surrogate Recovery
100X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol 1.10
Anthracene 0.10
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 0.04
2,4,6-Tri bromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
L
L
DX Surrogate Recovery
82X Surrogate Recovery
Arsenic
Cadmiim
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.40
0.01
0.28
0.22
0.09
3.25
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organic*, Metals
EPA Contract if 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Tachnology: Washing (PCI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMHO/R1/10
Lab Ref. I.D. H: 7080-8708012
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) :Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
1.30
0.05
0.02
0.04
0.40
0.12
1.20
H
U,H
,H
,H
L,
L,
H
H
H
105X Surrogate Recovery
99X Surrogate Recovery
101% Surrogate Recovery
Semiv/olatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.06 L
0.01 L
0.04 U
0% Surrogate Recovery
SOX Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.15
0.01
0.04
0.15
0.04
0.88
U
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology:
Final Report
Washing (PEI Associates)
October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R1/60
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708011
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.16
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.02
0.17
H
U,H
U,H
U,H
H
L.H
H
100X Surrogate Recove-y
104X Surrogate Recovery
96X Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.46 J-Low Surrogate Recovery
0.01 L
0.03 U
7% Surrogate Recovery
67X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.18
1.68
0.01
4.49
3.44
0.89
28.2
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Samivolatile Organ!cs. Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R1/10-60 (digestion duplicate)
Lab Ref. I.D. H: 7080-8708010 0
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1. 2-Oichloroethane-d4
NA
MA
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
NA X Surrogate Recovery
Semivplatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol NA
Anthracene NA
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate NA
2,4,6-Tribromophenol NA
Terphenyl-dl4 NA
X Surrogate Recovery
X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.33
0.01
0.32
0.74
0.11
6.40
U diff.
RPO
U diff.
diff.
diff.
diff.
RPD
= 0 mg/L
= 3X
= 0 mg/L
= 0 mg/L
=0.06 mg/L
= 0.01 mg/L
= 4X
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract H 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R1/10-60
Lab Ref. I.D. tt 7080-8708010
Oiqestion duplicate performed for metals: see next page for results
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.02 J-High Surrogate Recovery
0.05 U,J-High Surrogate Recovery
0.05 U,J-High Surrogate Recovery
0.22 J-High Surrogate Recovery
3.90 E,J-High Surrogate Recovery
99% Surrogate Recovery
152% Surrogate Recovery
112% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
O.OS L
0.01 L
0.02 U
26X Surrogate Recovery
44% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-146, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.32
0.01
0.32
0.68
0.12
6.17
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic*, Semivolatile Organic*. Metals
EPA Contract * 68-03-3393 LWA Projact 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R1/10-60
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708007
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Volatile Organic* (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-0ichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
0.03
0.07
0.09
0.94
0.17
1.57
NF
J—Poor Surrogate RecoveVy
J-Poor Surrogate Recovery
104,97X Surrogate Recovery
106X Surrogate Recovery
8IX Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
1.60 J-Calibration Problem
0.01 L
0.04 U
51X Surrogate Recovery
66X Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
2.09
9.05
0.08
14.52
25.20
2.95
175.4
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R1/10
Lab Ref. I.D. #: 7080-8708006
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846. Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.24
0.07
0.44
NF - Metlylene Chloride Inter-
ference
107% Surrogate Recovery
98% Surrogate Recovery
85% Surrogate Recovery
Semiv/olatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.58 J-Calibration Problem
0.02 U
0.02 U
100% Surrogate Recovery
48% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.94
2.98
0.01
3.01
0.35
1.23
79.1
U
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN £ ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic*, S«mivolatiU Organics, totals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16. 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R1/10
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708009
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-0ichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
3.40
0.25
0.97
0.91
9.11
2.32
17.82
J-High Surrogate Recoveries
J-High Surrogate Recoveries
E,J-High Surrogate Recoveries
E,J-High Surrogate Recoveries
E,J-High Surrogate Recoveries
97X Surrogate Recovery
123% Surrogate Recovery
120% Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-dl4
0.01 L
0.02 U
0.02 U
11X Surrogate Recovery
461 Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846. Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15
0.07
0.01
0.04
0.06
0.15
0.47
U
U
U
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic*, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract # 68-O3-3393 LUA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMHO/R1/60
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708008
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1.2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.47
0.36
0.84
0.69
7,
1
33
52
13.23
J-High Surrogate Recovery
J-High Surrogate Recovery
901 Surrogate Recovery
114% Surrogate Recovery
230% Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol 1.9
Anthracene 0.01
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 1.0
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 0
Terphenyl-dl4 0
J-Calibration Problem
L
U
% Surrogate Recovery
% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
10.94
14.7
0.03
210.8
55.43
19.2
326.4
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
EXPLANATION OF FLAGS USED
U - Lass than quantitation limit
NF - Not Found due to interference
from methylene chloride
E - Estimated value: value greater than highest standard
L - estimated value: compound found in sample at level
less than quantitation limit
H - analysis performed after 14 days holding expired
J - estimated value
0 - Surrogates deleted out
diff - difference between duplicate values
RPO - Relative percent difference between duplicate values
NA - Not Applicable
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53*5 Uiddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 51 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10 & F/HMHO/R3T/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
pentachlorophenol
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
Cone.
Spike
Added
62,000
250,000
Sample
Result
69,000
<10,000 (3,100)
Cone.
MS
62,000
200,000
%
Rec.
0
79
Cone.
MSP
77,000
200,000
%
Rec
«••••••
13
79
120,000 <10,000 (1,200) 94,000 77
120,000
99
Remarks: 10,000
NO
QuantUatlon limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quant1tat1 on limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
I Moisture - 3.94
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Accredited by th* American AMOC-.stion :cr Laboratory Accreditation in th* chemical
::el3 ol teiting as :jted in t.".e r-.rrent AALA Directory ot Accredited laocratone*
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Miadlebrook Pike • Knoxvii'e Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PRO JETT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER rjMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_12_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
cnlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
48,000
30,000
<8,100 (5,500)
710,000
110,000
47,000
970,000
Remarks: 8,100 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 * This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 38.07
Apprcved Sy
. S
Laboratory Manager
' *:= c: '
- -V !•••* Arr.er.car. i
'esi:r.j as !.siei :: !.i
'.sisors-zrv Accreditanor. .r. ;n« cherrjca
1A 3.:erc.->- o: Acrreinec Labcrator.es
-------
nra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
381 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 11 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R30/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
56,000
21,000
4,400
270,000
51,000
39,000
460,000
Remarks: 2,000 * Quantltatlon Limit
ND * Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit.
This component has a quantltatlon limit two (2) times that listed.
i
X Moisture - 37.33
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Till*
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
neld ot testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory oi Accredited Laboratories
93.9-8
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
**~-
- ^
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__L4_ OF M
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
2,100
NO
NO
<470 (450)
<470 (350)
NO
1,000
Note: This sample could not be run undiluted due to foaming in the purge cell.
Remarks: 470 « Quantitation Limit
NO = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 46.79
/y / jK>r-
Approved 6y
Laboratory Manager
Tn.e
Ac:ree:ted by the Ar-.e.-.car. Asscna::cr. !c: Lcbcrstory Accreditation :r. th* chemica:
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
13 OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3D/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
53,000
32,000
6,500
650,000
82,000
51.000
660,000
Remarks: 2,300
ND
<
1
Quantltatlon Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quant1tat1on limit.
This component has a quantltatlon limit two (2) times that listed,
t Moisture • 46.51
Approved By
Laboratory Manager
Till*
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ol testing, as listed in trie current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratone*
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ro IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 16 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
11,000
130
160
930
280
88
1,500
Remarks: 5 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 * This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 3.94
Approve: Off
Laboratory Manager
Accredited ty the Arr.encar. Asscr.r-.cr. ';r Labcrcrsry Accreditation, ir. the chemical
-------
EEJ
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
561 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__L5_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3D/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight!
1,400
NO
NO
780
<250 (210)
130
1,600
Note: This sample could not be run undiluted due to foaming 1n the purge cell.
Remarks: 250 * Quantitation Limit
NO - Not detected
< • Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 « This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture » 46.41
Approve^Dy
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by me American Association ior Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ot testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited LaborataM*
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__LZ_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
15,000
890
ND
7,200
ND
880
36,000
Remarks: 310 = Quantitatlon Limit
ND = Not detected
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 » This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 19.27
//-'•
Approves DV
Laboratory Manager
Accreaned ty the Arr.er.car Asscc;ancr :cr Labora'ory Accreditation .r, the chemica:
:.e.2 o: testing as istec .r. :r.e current AALA Direcic-y o! Accredited LaScrsones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED-
PROJECT CODE.
ORDER NUMBER-
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
18 OP 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3D/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-di chl oroeth me
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
18,000
23
39
110
60.
7
230
Remarks: 5
NO
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
t Moisture » 3.99
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ol testing as listed in (he current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratone*
93 9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL ANALYTICAL
TECHNOLOGY «**^***j * * *^^***i
CORPORATION SE R VICE S
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 •615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 20 OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
31,000
560
260
4,500
NO
390
7,700
Remarks: 260 * Quantitation Limit
ND - Not detected
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 - This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 2.97
'/-•'-* i.^
Approved
Laboratory Manager
T.'.le
Accreii'ei =y lh« American Assc:iat:or. !cr Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
:.e:i :• ^est.r.a as i:sie2 ir !K.e r-rer.1 AAL' r:rec-c^' c: Accrea:te
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY.
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5315 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
19 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3D/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
15,000
1,000
<310 (300)
7,700
NO
1,400
15,000
Remarks: 310
NO
Quant nation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
t Moisture • 18.98
Approved
Till*
Laboratory Manager
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in trie chemical
Held 01 testing at listed in the current AALA Directory 01 Accredited Laboratone*
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
:o IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__21_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
12,000
1,100
460
8,800
ND
690
15,000
Remarks: 310 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 18.98
>x'
Apprcvei iy/
'_ f-< U.
Laboratory Manager
A:cre3.teu cy tr.e Arr.er.csr. *iss;:.r:.cr. :c- Lsbcrc'ory Accreditation, ir the chemical
: e.; '• -est " as '.:s'*z .r :.-.e r_rev .\A1A. 2.•?":-• z'. Accre5:ies Laboraiores
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Kcioxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
* i*
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__22_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3D/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(pg/kg dry weight)
14,000
34
33
130
83
6
260
Remarks: 5 » Quant1tat1on Limit
ND * Not detected
< » Detected but at a level less than the quant1tat1 on limit.
This component has a quantitatlon limit two (2) times that listed.
i
% Moisture « 3.37
Approved I
Laboratory Manager
T.tle
Accr«dii«d by the American Association tor Laboratory AccrtditoRion in trw crwrrucal
Held ot t«siino as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited LateratonM
93-9 85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE^_24_ OF M
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(wg/kg dry weight)
590
<5 (2)
NO
9
12
ND
29
Remarks: 5 * Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 * This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 3.38
// .
f //
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Accredited ty the Amercan Asscc.auor. :or Lc&cralory Accreditation in trie cherwcaJ
::e:c -: t-st:*s 25 ;:stec ir. tr.e curren' AA1A. D.reciory of Accrecned Laboraror.es
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middiedrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__23_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3D/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
4,000
900
<310 (180)
8,200
NO
930
14,000
Remarks: 310
ND
Quant1tat1on Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantltatlon limit two (2) times that listed.
* Moisture » 18.45
Approved By
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Assorianon tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_2S_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ng/kg dry weight)
740
<6 (3)
<6 (4)
18
20.
NO
48
Remarks: 6 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< - Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 » This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 16.59
Laboratory Manager
Ac:rec.!ea cy •!•.« Arr.er.csr Asscr.s!.:r :cr isocrv.sry Accredr.atior. .r. the chemical
! els o: iesi;r.g as .:stec •'. ;ne rurre*.1 AALA C.-ersri' o! Accredned Laoorntor.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
£31 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_2fi_OF_5J__
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3D/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
330
<5 (2)
NO
9
9
NO
28
Remarks: 5 = Quant1tat1on Limit
ND * Not detected
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 » This component has a quantltatlon limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture * 3.15
Approved by«/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by tne Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field of testing as luted in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
rra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5315 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER: 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
- PAGE_2E_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
4,300,000
1,700,000
<730,000 (86,000)
Remarks: 730,000 - Quantitatlon limit.
NO - Not detected.
< » Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture » 31.50
Laboratory Manager
Ac:res:tei ry me Amer.car. Assor:=::or. :c: Lacxsraiory AccreSitatior. :n the chemical
'•?.c c' lest:-: si lis'ei :r T.e rj—e-.- A.Al^ U rercr.- ;: Accrec:tec L3torrc-es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53' 5 Micdlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 27 OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMIO/R3D/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
760
<6 (2)
<6 (3)
12
NO
NO
32
Remarks: 6 * Quantitatlon Limit
ND * Not detected
< « Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
« This component has a quantltatlon limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture « 15.11
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Meld ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Latoratonw
-------
tra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
V-flr /
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ro IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__JO_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,800,000
1,900,000
ND
Remarks: 400,000 - Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
% Moisture * 38.07
Approvea
Laboratory Manager
Tn.e
ArcreCitei cy t.K.e Anencan Ass:r:atior. :or Laooraiory Accreditation ;n the cherruca)
•e.c i' '*s-.r.j 25 ..sie= ..- t.-.e c.-er.' i.i_A D.rerory o: Acrreditei Laboroicr.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53' 5 Midalebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED-
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
?9 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R30/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexylJphthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
dry weight)
7,300,000
1,300,000
<370,000 (120,000)
Remarks: 370,000
NO
<
Quant1tat1on limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quant it at ion limit
parenthesis are estimated.
Values in
% Moisture - 37.33
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ot testing as listed in me current AALA Directory ol Accredited taboratone*
93.9-8
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
. £ •
5315 MiddlebrooK Pike • Knoxvilie Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__22_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexy1)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
720,000
160,000
NO
Remarks: 18,000 - Quantisation limit.
ND * Not detected.
< - Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit.
% Moisture * 46.79
-.•-*
Approved
Laboratory Manager
y trie A.T.er.ccr. Asscr:3!.or. -y Isoon'ory Accredi:atior .r. she chemica:
-!? as i:sie: ir. \r.e c.Ter/ AA1> D rsccr,- o: Accrei.iec LanorG:one<
-------
INTERNATIONAL ANALYTICAL
TECHNOLOGY AIM Aii I i iWAJj ,^
CORPORATION SERVICES
53'5 Viidoiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401 ->is
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
ATTN: Barbara Locke PROJECT CODE UEC 24820
11499 Chester Road ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
Cincinnati, OH 45246 PAGE__3I_OF_5J__
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3D/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Concentration
Compound (ug/kg dry weight)
anthracene 3,600,000
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1,300,000
pentachlorophenol NO
Remarks: 450,000 * Quant1tat1on limit.
ND * Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit.
% Moisture - 46.51
Approved OY
Laboratory Manager
T.tle
Accredited by the Amencon Association tor Utboratory Accreditation in the chemical
of testing as listed in me current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__3A_ OF gl
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<10,000 (3,100)
<10,000 (1,200)
69,000
Remarks: 10,000
ND
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture » 3.94
Apprcvec by
Laboratory Manager
AccrecneS by :.fc.e A,T,en:=r. Asscr:cr:=r ic- LaDorfflor,- Accreditation ir. the rhemiee:
'.e.c z: '«<-r.j cs :.s-e: .r -re c-rrer.1 A-ALA. S.rectsr,- c: AccreSitec l=r>cra:cr;es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53! 5 MiddlebrooK Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER: 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__13_ OF gJI
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3D/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
690,000
150,000
ND
Remarks: 19,000 » QuantUatlon limit.
NO - Not detected.
< « Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit.
% Moisture » 46.41
yc<^
Approved By
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accrediianon in the chemical
Held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__3S_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexy1)phtha1ate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(vg/kg dry weight)
1,400,000
25,000
71,000
Remarks: 12,000 = Quantitation limit.
NO = Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quant1tation limit.
% Moisture = 19.27
Ap proves DY
Laboratory Manager
Arc-extei =v :he A,T.er.c=r Asscr.r sr.::: Lcbcrs-ary- Acrredi'Kior. ;r. me cr.err.ic:.
:«i= y. lestir.; as lat«2 :.-. me cure-: AA1A D.rectory o! Accrediiec Laboraionei
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
=6'5 V'ddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 36 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3D/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phtha1ate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<10,000 (1,800)
NO
<10,000 (7,900)
Remarks: 10,000 a QuantHation limit.
NO * Not detected.
< « Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture « 3.99
Approves
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association !or Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
01 lesting as listed m the current AALA Direaory ol Accredited Laboratones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__38_ OF SI
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(i'g/kg dry weight)
<10,000 (4,100)
NO
<10,000 (9,500)
Remarks: 10,000 * Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< - Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
% Moisture * 2.97
Laboratory Manager
Acrrea:iei ty tr-.e A.T>enc3r. Assens'.sr :or Lacorarory Accreditatior. :r. the c.lemicc:
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Viaaleorook Pike • Knoxvilie Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ro IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__31_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3D/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(v-g/kg dry weight)
2,300,000
27,000
12,000
Remarks: 12,000 » QuantUatlon limit.
ND * Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
t Moisture « 18.98
Approvedwy
Laboratory Manager
T.tle
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held 01 testing as listed m trie current AALA Directory oi Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 39 OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(^g/kg dry weight)
2,500,000
100,000
<12,000 (5,800)
Remarks: 12,000 = Quantitation limit.
NO = Not detected.
< « Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture » 18.98
Approves
Laboratory Manager
Ar:re=:!ec =y tr.e Amer.csr. Assc:i3:.or :rr laborr-ory Accrednct.cr. :r. the cherr.ica.
'.•=.: o: '«$:..-.= =s .-.sisc :r. :r.e i.rrer.' J>ALA O.r»rc^- o: Acrrecne
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5315 Ucalebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__4Q_ OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3D/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phtha1ate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<9,900 (2,500)
<9,900 (2,200)
<9,900 (7,300)
Remarks: 9,900 » Quant1tat1on limit.
NO * Not detected.
< - Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture • 3.37
Approved By
Laboratory Manager
T.lle
Accredited by the Amencar. Assoc'.ation tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held oi testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93 9-8
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
551 5 Miadlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__42_ OF
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<10,000 (1,200)
24,000
<10,000 (1,100)
Remarks: 10,000 = Quantitatlon limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 3.38
App-cve= fey
Laboratory Manager
:«= cy tr.e Air.encsr j»ascr.5'.:'.:;: ^sscrs'sry Acrr*S:ioi:cr. ,r T.e cr.err.ica:
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53: 5 Uddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
41 OF 51
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R3D/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethy1hexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
2,500,000
110,000
<12,000 (3,400)
Remarks: 12,000
ND
<
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
t Moisture - 18.45
Approved by'
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing as listed in tr-.e current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratones
-------
INTERNATIONAL ANALYTICAL
TECHNOLOGY •rn^rVLi I 1 L\*fLLj .
CORPORATION SERVICES ":'
*
5815 Middleorook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 "
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
ATTN: Barbara Locke PROJECTCODE ITEC 24820
11499 Chester Road ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
Cincinnati, OH 45246 PACSF 43 nr 51
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Concentration
Compound (ug/kg dry weight)
anthracene 150,000
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 19,000
pentachlorophenol <11,000 (6,200)
Remarks: 11,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND * Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture * 16.59
'V
Approve=*y
Laboratory Manager
Acc-ea::ei by :re Arr.tr.car. Assc:;:' :• cr Icsc-cron' Accreditatisr. .r. tr.e cr.err.ica!
:.e:s o; tesi.r.r cs !.sie2 .r 'r.e r-rre-' AA1A D.recicrv o! Accrec:;ea
-------
INTERNATIONAL ANALYTICAL
TECHNOLOGY xmxiiii nv**VU
CORPORATION SERVICES
-5' 5 V'ddiebrook Pike • Knoxvilie Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
ATTN: Barbara Locke PRCJECTCODE ITEC 24820
11499 Chester Road ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
Cincinnati, OH 45246 PAGE 44_OF_5J__
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R30/10 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Concentration
Compound (ug/kg dry weight)
anthracene <10,000 (2,100)
bis(2-ethylhexy1)phthalate 32,000
pentachlorophenol <10,000 (3,800)
Remarks: 10,000 = Quant1tat1on limit.
ND - Not detected.
< » Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture » 3.15
Approved L.
Laboratory Manager
Titie
Accredited by the American Assor.auon tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
iield ol testing as luted :n tr.e current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
46_ OF M
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/60 & F/HMHO/R3D/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
acetone
chlorpbenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethane
xylenes
Cone.
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Cone.
MS
73,000 31,000 70,000
Rec.
53
67,000
Rec.
49
RPD
7.8
73,000
73,000
190,000
73,000
73,000
34,000
5,400
540,000
88,000
60,000
100,000
96,000
720,000
130,000
120,000
90.
124
95
58
82
110,000
79,000
830,000
170,000
120,000
104
101
153
112
82
-14
20.
-47
-64
0
150,000 800,000 950,000 100 1,000,000 133 -28
Remarks: 7,300 = Quantitatlon Limit
Moisture * 31.50
Note: OS values are from a rerun of the sample, not the same run used for data reports.
Apprcvea ry
Laboratory Manager
A~-eu.tea cv tr,e A.-r.er.rar Asso:.r ~r ::: L=E5r5'2r\- AccreSitotisr. :r. m« cNerrjca:
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
:>~' 5 Middledrook Pike • Knoxviiie Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__J5_ OF M
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R3D/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexy1)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
100,000
44,000
<12,000 (9,300)
Remarks: 12,000
NO
Quant1tat1on limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture « 15.11
Approved tft/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association !or Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
iield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Direcory ot Accredited Laboratone*
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 4fl OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10-60 & F/HMHO/R3T/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
acetone
1,2-dichloroethane
tetrachloroethane
chlorobenzene
ethyl benzene
styrene
total xylenes
Cone.
Spike
Added
15,000
3,100
3,100
3,100
7,400
3,100
3,100
Sample Cone,
Result MS
6,600 12,000
<310 (140) 3,300
1,900 5,200
1,800 4,900
17,000 28,000
5,100 8,900
32,000 38,000
%
Rec.
36
102
106
100
149
123
194
Cone.
MSD
^^•^^••••i
13,000
3,200
6,300
5,700
36,000
11,000
51,000
Rec.
•^••••^B
43
99
142
126
257
190
RPD
-18
3.0
-5.6
-23
-53
-43
613 -104
Remarks: 310 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< » Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
Moisture - 19.27
Note: OS values are from a rerun of the sample, not the same run used for data reports,
Approve-
Laboratory Manager
Arcreue: cy if.e Ar.encsr Assc:.=::cr. :c- l.s&crs'sry Accreditation .r. :.^e cr:err..C3!
:.e.= c: :esi..-.; as lisses :.-. me r-irrer.: AA1A Direcicry ol Accr*C!t*d Laooraiones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
~3-5 Miaalebrook Pike • Kncxviiie Tennessee 37921 •615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
47 OF M
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10 & F/HMHO/R3T/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
acetone
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethane
xylenes
Cone.
Spike
Added
2,600
2,600
2,600
2,600
2,600
2,600
Sample
Result
340
ND
2,700
820
310
4,600
3,500
2,500
10,000
4,800
3,600
15,000
122
96
281
150
127
400
13,000 14,000 29,000 115 31,000
4,300
2,400
17,000
6,300
4,600
27,000
X
Rec.
^^BBHHH
131
152
92
550
211
165
862
-22
4.
-65
-34
-26
-73
Remarks: 250 - Quant1tat1on Limit
ND « Not detected
Moisture * 3.94
Note: OS values are from a rerun of the sample, not the same run used for data reports.
Approved by,/'
Laboratory Manager
T;t:«
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Jieid 0! testing as listed ;r. :r.e current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratones
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Plke • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_5fl_ OF _5J
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10-60 & F/HMHO/R3T/10-60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
pentachlorophenol
anthracene
bis(2-ethy1hexyl)
phthalate
Cone.
Spike Sample
Added Result
145,000 71,000
579,000 1,400,000
289,000 25,000
Cone.
MS
67,000
680,000
%
Rec.
0
0
Cone.
MSP
70,000
410,000
%
Rec.
0
0
RPD
0
0
180,000 54
190,000
57
-5.4
Remarks: 12,000 » Quantitation limit.
NO « Not detected.
< » Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit.
% Moisture » 19.27
Approved tsi/.
Laboratory Manager
Ac:reo;te± ry \fjt Arrencar. Asscr.
::e:= e: 'est.-; 01 ..!!••: .r. ;.-• r.
:cr laSorstcry Accr»aitaiior. IT. th« er.«T.i
o: Accre3:t*3 L
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53'5 VtiCCleorook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 49 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/60 & F/HMHO/R3T/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are ug/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
pentachlorophenol
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
Cone.
Spike
Added
1
350
,400
,000
.000
Sample
Result
<730
4,300
,000
,000
(86,000)
3
Cone.
MS
190
,500
,000
,000
%
Rec.
24
0
Cone.
MSP
270
5,500
,000
,000
%
Rec
^^•IBMH
52
86
700,000 1,700,000
2,200,000 57 2,300,000
86
Remarks: 730,000 « Quant1tat1on limit.
NO • Not detected.
< - Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
t Moisture - 31.50
Approved
Laboratory Manager
:.tle
Accredited try the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tieid 01 t«sting at luted in tf.* current AALA Directory 01 Accredited Lataratone*
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organic3, Semivolatile Organics. Metals
EPA Contract # 68-03-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology: Washing (PEI Associates)
Final Report - October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/LMLO/R2/10
Lab Ref. 1.0. #: 7080-8708031
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Oichloroethane-d4
0.10 U
0.05 U
0.01 L
0.01 L
0.07
0.02
0.13
106% Surrogate Recovery
11IX Surrogate Recovery
97X Surrogate Recovery
Semi volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tri bromopheno1
Terphenyl-d!4
0.01 L
0.01 L
0.04
68X Surrogate Recovery
72% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-846, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
0.15 U
0.05
0.01 U
0.10
0.15 U
0.04 U
0.42
"Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
LEE WAN & ASSOCIATES - LABORATORY DIVISION
TCLP - Volatile Organics, Semivolatile Organics, Metals
EPA Contract H 68-O3-3393 LWA Project 86523
Treatment Technology:
Final Report
Washing (PEI Associates)
October 16, 1987
Sample Name: T/HMLO/R2/10
Lab Ref. 1.0. H: 7080-8708030
Date Received: 8/13/87
Compound
Result
(mg/L) Flag*/Remark
Volatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8240)
Acetone
1,2-Oichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Xylenes (Total)
Toluene-d8
Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
0.38
0.05 U
0.03
0.04
0.34
0.08
0.82
93,102% Surrogate Recovery
94,101% Surrogate Recovery
107% Surrogate Recovery
Semivolatile Organics (SW-846, Method 8270)
Pentachloropheno1
Anthracene
Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
2,4,6-Tribromopheno1
Terphenyl-dl4
0.03 L,J-Low Surrogate Recovery
0.01 L
0.02 U
3% Surrogate Recovery
44% Surrogate Recovery
Metals (SW-€46, Method 6010)
Arsenic
Cadmium '
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel *
Zinc
0.64
3.67
0.01
1.15
5.27
1.32
46.2
^Description of flags provided on a separate page
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53' 5 Middiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
9 OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10-60 & F/HMHO/R3T/10-60
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
ConpounJ
arsenic
cadmium
chromium
copper
lead
nickel
zinc
Cone.
Spike
Added
MS
516
2,060
516
2,060
2,060
516
10,300
Cone.
Spike
Added
MSP
563
2,250
563
2,250
2,250
563
11,300
Sample
Result
105
311
30.2
390.
657
52.1
1,980
600.
2,230
489
2,610
2,430
523
12,600
707
2,390
536
2,640
3,130
595
14,300
RPD
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
Approved taf
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. I TEC 24820
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
in OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/60 (Soil) received August 18, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
50,000
23,000
4,500
330,000
56,000
51,000
460,000
Remarks: 1,800
ND
<
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 31.50
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accreaned by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
fieic o! testing as listed ir the curren' AALA Directory o! Accreaited Laboratones
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53- 5 Vidalebrook Pike • Knoxvihe Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_Z OF 51
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/60 & F/HMHO/R3T/60
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
arsenic
cadmium
chromium
copper
lead
nickel
zinc
Cone.
Spike
Added
MS
2,470
3,710
7,420
55,700
74,200
3,090
124,000
Cone.
Spike
Added
MSP
2,610
3,910
7,820
58,600
78,200
3,260
130,000
Sample
Result
523
724
1,480
11,100
14,600
641
24,800
2,780
4,180
8,330
68,600
78,900
3,480
141,000
Cone.
MSD
91
93
92
103
87
92
94
2,800
4,130
8,330
69,400
78,600
3,500
144,000
92
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield of testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED-
PROJECT CODE-
ORDER NUMBER-
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_8—OF_5i—
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R3/10 & F/HMHO/R3T/10
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Compound
arsenic
cadmium
chromium
copper
lead
nickel
zinc
Cone.
Spike
Added
MSD
39,
39,
39,
39,
39,
39.
38.2
39.7
Sample
Result
38.8
286
6.2
76.9
16.2
81.5
456
RPD
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
* = Spike concentration < 4 times the native analyte concentration, therefore QC criteria
do not apply.
Approved By
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar, Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the cherrucal
lielz o: testing as listed ir. the currer.t AALA Directory- o! Accredited Laborator.es
-------
nra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53' 5 VliGdiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
I TEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
5 OP 51
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMHO/R3/10
2.5
6.6
2.8
10.4
9.8
3.1
39.6
2.97
F/LMHO/R3/10-60
6.7
10.6
3.2
37.2
31.5
6.8
101
F/LMHO/R3D/10
6.5
7.2
3.2
13,
10,
18.98
7.1
56.2
3.37
F/LMHO/R3D/10-6
11.3
2.8
32.0
48.7
6.7
101
18.45
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield ot testing as listed m the current AAIA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8!
-------
tra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED-
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER.
PAGE-
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_6 OF_51_
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmiurn
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMLO/R3/10
3.6
4.2
2.2
9.4
8.5
3.0
23.8
3.38
F/LMLO/R3/10-60
3.2
9.8
2.9
20
24
5.2
72.3
1
.2
16.59
F/LMLO/R3D/10
2.3
5.3
3.2
8.6
8.5
3.3
27.8
3.15
F/LMLO/R3D/10-60
3.9
9.1
4.1
37.0
39.3
8.4
152
15.11
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accreaited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
neia o! testing as nslec ir. the current AALA Directory o! Accreditec Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
58*5 Vl'fldlebrook Pike • Kncxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
3 OF 51
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/HMHO/R3/10 &
F/HMHO/R3T/10
32.7
253
5.6
72.8
80.8
14.9
412
3.94
F/HMHO/R3/10-60 &
F/HMHO/R3T/10-60
105
311
30.3
390.
657
52.1
1,980
19.27
Approved «6 Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
-------
rra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
•„ .''.^r 'n=i
'-\\4~jL
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER-
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
4 OF 51
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmi urn
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/HMHO/R3D/10
27.2
363
6.2
53.4
56.0
13.1
513
3.99
F/HMHO/R3D/10-60
114
362
34.7
501
979
73.7
4,090
18.98
U*£r
Approved »f
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
58^ 5 Vlicdleorook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
1 OF 51
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/HMHO/R3/60 &
F/HMHO/R3T/60
523
724
1,480
11,100
14,600
641
24,800
31.5
F/HMHO/R3D/60
552
754
1,510
11,100
15,300
596
26,000
37.33
Approved *y
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE'
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24820
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
2 OF 51
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 18, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMHO/R3/60
16.3
22.8
41.3
349
372
28.7
596
38.07
F/LMHO/R3D/60
21,
29,
52,
420,
468
34,
698
46.51
F/LMLO/R3/60
20.1
39.6
62.6
505
528
45.1
917
46.79
F/LMLO/R3D/60
35.6
35.8
50.6
450.
494
38.6
894
46.41
Approved tfj Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
'.5 a c' 'es'.-a a; i.s'ez r the curre-.' A.iU. Directcrv c' Acr-eaitea Laborer'ones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
55^5 Miaaiebrook Pike • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I'EC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_3JL_ OF _41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
27,000
450
<310 (290)
1,900
ND
<310 (170)
4,600
Remarks: 310 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 19.21
Approved
'
Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
E3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO
IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDERNUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_4J__ OF 11
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
12,000
110
74
800
ND
74
1,800
Remarks:
31
ND
<
1
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 19.02
Approved l
Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemical
!ie;ci o! testing as listea in the current AALA Directory o: Accredited Lacoralone;
93-9-6!
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53'5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24756
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
38 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
16,000
27
<26 (20.)
110
NO
<26 (8)
260
Remarks: 26
ND
i _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.49
Approved
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxviile. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED. September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
40 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
4,200
28
ND
150
ND
<26 (10.)
500
Remarks:
26
ND
<
1
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.07
Approvedt>yLaboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica!
tield o; ies1,na as listed ir the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
:5: 5 lOiadiebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
~"- -•**?£•
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
10 IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEJ.3741-7-2)
PAGE_35__ OF __±1_
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
2,100
190
<31 (27)
1,700
570
200
3,200
Remarks: 31 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 20.19
Approved tsy
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
!;eld ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
rra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER: 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_3Z__ OF 11
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
1,300
140
<31 (21)
940
ND
120
1,900
Remarks: 31 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 20.15
Approved
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tc: Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lie.:: o! testing as Hsiec; in the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Labora'ones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
56:5 Midaleorook Pi«e • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_3_i__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
670
10.
<5 (2)
55
34
<5 (3)
120
Remarks: 5 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.42
Apcrov"wLaboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accredltallon in the chemical
field o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
-»>;
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
To IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__36_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
810
6
NO
24
18
<5 (1)
89
Remarks: 5 = Quantisation Limit
ND - Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.70
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
!iels o' testir.a as listea in tne current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboraiones
93-9-6!
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53 • 5 \iicdlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ro IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGF 31 OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
4,700
<310 (260)
<310 (160)
1,400
ND
<310 (210)
3,300
Remarks: 310 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 18.11
Approved
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboralory Accreditation in the chemical
lield o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_33_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
5,400
340
<62 (20.)
2,800
ND
230
5,600
Remarks: 62
ND
1 _
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 19.83
Manager
Title
Accredited by the A.-y.er.car. Association ;or Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica:
' e ~ c: ies'.ic at ::s'ec :r i!-e cu—er.i AjMA. D.rec*2rv o: Accrec.'ez LabGra*oneE
93-9-Sf
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
' 5 viicdiebrook P:ke • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED ^Pj6^^.30' 1987
PRO IFCT CODE
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PA^F 30 OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
2,400
ND
<26 (7)
<26 (25)
29
ND
98
Remarks: 26 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitatlon limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.72
Approved by .
Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
T0 IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED fgj"*?^30' 198?
PRO IFPT CDDF I I EC 24756
ORDE^BER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE—3.2— OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
5,700
<26 (7)
ND
35
ND
ND
76
Remarks: 26 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 * This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 5.07
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53' 5 Viadlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE JTEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__28_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
150,000
130,000
19,000
1,900,000
340,000
200,000
3,000,000
Remarks: 2,200
NO
i _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantltatlon limit.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 42.34
laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT COCE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
29 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
140,000
190,000
30,000
2,700,000
470,000
300,000
530,000
Remarks:
2,000
ND
<
1
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 36.64
Approved
Manager
Title
Accrea.tec by the Amencar. Asscciat.or. lor Laboratory Accreditation in the cherruca:
t:e.c o! tes'.ia as listea :r. the carrent AALA Directory c! Accreanea Laboraior.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
:c' 5 Micdlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO
IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24756
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_26 OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
8,700
2,100
<550 (120)
41,000
8,400
3,700
76,000
Remarks: 550
NO
Quantitat1 on Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 54.49
Approved
., xfz*.
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-!
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
27 OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
24,000
1,100
<240 (49)
27,000
4,500
2,200
41,000
Remarks: 240 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 57.59
Appwed laboratory Manager
Title
Accred.te- oy the American Asscc;atior. tor Laboratory Accreditation :r. the cherr.ica'.
:,e ~ -' ies:.r.c as r.siec: :r t",e cjrrer' .VC-A. rnrecto'v o' Acrrec;.tec: LaScra!or<=;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53' 5 Vice ebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24756
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
?_1_ OF 11 _
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
jug/kg dry weight)
150,000
340,000
50,000
3,300,000 E
780,000 E
590,000 E
240,000
Remarks: 2,900 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
E = Exceeds calibration range; however, values compared well with
P/HMHO/R1D/60.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 56.35
Approvedfc*(aboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_25_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
450,000
270,000
46,000
4,600,000
720,000
450,000
6,500,000
Remarks: 57,000 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed,
1
% Moisture = 55.95
Approvess^v Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited fcv the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemical
: e ; :' tes'.-c as : s'ec .- f.e curre" AALA r".'ecic-,p o' Accrea tec. Lcb-e-a'cres
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
53' 5 M.ddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 21 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
a.ithracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
2,900,000
110,000
<55,000 (18,000)
Remarks: 55,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND - Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 19.21
Apprev'a* Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
•^^">-:,. -
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
23 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
3,400,000
75,000
<50,000 (34,000)
Remarks: 50,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 19.02
Approveo^
laboratory Manager
Titie
Accres.'ec: ty ihe Amer.car Asscc;a:.Dr. !o: Laboratory Accreaitatio'. :r. the cheir.i:a.
::e.- c' iest:r.5 as hs'es :r T,e rurren: f-J-U-. D:recioT o: Accrec.ie: Laboratcr.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
551 5 Micaleorook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_2Q__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
\i
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<53,000 (9,000)
<53,000 (5,600)
<53,000 (11,000)
Remarks: 53,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 4.49
Approved b'y
Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED. September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ^TEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_22__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<20,000 (4,000)
<20,000 (2,400)
120,000
Remarks: 20,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 4.07
Approve/byLaboratory Manager
Accredited cy tne Amencan Association to: Laboratory Accreditation, in. the cherries'
: re~~-; o' Acer-due: Lsrcrtrc-e;
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 MiddlebrooK Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_LL_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethy1hexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
520,000
<11,000 (9,000)
37,000
Remarks: 11,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< - Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 20.19
Approved by i
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboralory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93.9-1
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED. September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 19 OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethyThexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
430,000
<12,000 (5,900)
43,000
Remarks: 12,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 20.15
Approvealaboratory Manager
nez by me Ajrier.can Association lor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemica!
ies;i-c a: !:s'e: :r. tr.e currer.' AM/ Direr-cry o' Accreaitec Lacora'cne;
95-9-es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
:&' 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 3792^ • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE nEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_j£__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phtha1ate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(pg/kg dry weight)
<8,900 (1,300)
<8,900 (2,200)
11,000
Remarks: 8,900 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 4.42
Approved &/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 18 OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethy!hexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
ND
<10,000 (2,300)
<10,000 (7,400)
Remarks: 10,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 4.70
Approved by")
Laboratory Manager
Ac.res.te: ny the Arr.er.car. Assoc;a:;or. lo: Lcboralory Accreditation ;r, tne cnemica.
:.e,- z' lestira as :iste- .r IK.e rurrer.' ^Lf-. D:re"orv- s'. Accreaitec Lnocratc.-.e;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 o Midalebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE *T^C 24756
ORDER NUMBER' 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 13 op 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(wg/kg dry weight)
2,800,000
63,000
130,000
Remarks: 11,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
% Moisture - 18.11
Approved by
Title
Accredited by the Amencan AsKCiation tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-'
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike* Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE—I5—. OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
3,000,000
54,000
160,000
Remarks: 12,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
% Moisture = 19.83
Approved cy
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited ty tne Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemica:
t.e.z c' tes'.-.c as listec ir :re currerv A.A1A. Directory- o! Accredited Labora'cnes
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
:61 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
To IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_i2___ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexy!)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<9,600 (5,600)
<9,600 (1,800)
24,000
Remarks: 9,600 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture * 4.72
>f;
Approvedby
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE JJEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEIr3741-7-2)
PAGE_44_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
v
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
<9,500 (7,200)
<9,500 (3,400)
12,000
Remarks: 9,500 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 5.07
Approvec fcy
Laboratory Manager
Tine
Accrea:
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 MiddlebrooK Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_iP__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
2,100,000
2,200,000
<80,000 (52,000)
Remarks: 80,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< « Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture * 42.34
Values in
Approved ^/Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Iield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_U_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(wg/kg dry weight)
800,000
1,100,000
<70,000 (54,000)
Remarks: 70,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 36.64
Title
Accreaitec bv me Amencar. Association. !c.- Laboratory Accreditation in the chemics.
92 9-6r
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
To IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_8__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bi s(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,700,000
980,000
44,000
Remarks: 38,000 = Quantitation Hm1t.
ND = Not detected.
< » Detected but at a level less than the quant1tation limit.
% Moisture - 54.49
Approved
Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_i OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
\j
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,900,000
1,200,000
<120,000 (74,000)
Remarks: 120,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 57.59
Approved 1
Manager
Title
Accrea:ied by tne Amenccr Asscciat:cr. 10- Laborcitory Accreditalior. in the chemical
95-9-e;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PACE 6 OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexylJphthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
9,000,000
6,200,000
520,000
Remarks: 220,000 = Quantitation limit.
NO = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
% Moisture - 56.35
S to.
Approved "^Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation m the chemical
held o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8!
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_7___ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMHO/R1D/60 (Soil) received August 6, 1987
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
7,600,000
5,200,000
<390,000 (350,000)
Remarks: 390,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 55.95
ApprovedOY laboratory Manager
Tit.e
Accredited Sy the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 M'ddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE JJEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEU3741-7-2)
PAGE
805018 (PEU3
4 _ OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 6, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
\;
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/HMLO/R1D/10 F/HMLO/R1D/10-60 F/LMHO/R1/10 F/LMHO/R1/10-60
51.8
342
4.3
82
128
23
564
4.70
89.3
283
15.3
254
424
43.8
1,120
20.15
2.7
6.3
0.94
9.0
11.7
2.5
42.0
4.49
7.0
11.9
3.1
31,
27,
8.9
94.6
,3
,7
19.21
Approved toy/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER. 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_L__ OF 41
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 6, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMHO/R1D/10
3.3
8.3
2.1
12.3
10.5
3.8
47.5
4.07
F/LMHO/R1D/10-60
3.3
10.7
2.1
,7
,9
29,
29,
6.7
117
19.02
Approved by
Manager
Accreaited ty tne Amencar. Association !or Laboratory Accreditation in tne chemical
,,e-. c, les. r- as ,lsle:; :r t^e ru~er.' f-J-LJ- D.rectcr%- c' A"re±tec Labcra'cies
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE IJEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEIT3741-7-2)
PAGE_3__ OF __ii_
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 6, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMHO/R1/60
21.2
32.8
52.5
462
470.
41.8
853
42.34
F/LMHO/R1D/60
16,
24,
34,
312
333
28,
599
36.64
P/HMHO/R1/10
100.
303
3.7
122
146
26.0
706
4.72
P/HMHO/R1/10-60
112
309
63.4
813
1,520
129
8,430
18.11
Approved fey
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accredltahon in the chemical
held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
To IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_J__ OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 6, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
P/HMHO/R1D/10
36.9
337
3.7
71.7
85.1
16.1
465
5.07
P/HMHQ/R1D/10-60 F/HMLO/R1/10 F/HMLO/R1/10-60
108
273
45.5
673
1,040
96.5
6,420
19.83
57.5
402
3.4
54.0
115
13.6
553
4.42
114
270.
14.3
273
558
40.7
906
20.19
Approvea ^laboratory Manager
Titie
Accredited by the Ame-car. Asscnar.cr. tor Laboratory- Accreditatior. ir. the chemical
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxvilie Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_AL_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2D/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
\J
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
2,000,000
<110,000 (89,000)
<110,000 (20,000)
Remarks: 110,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 19.28
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24756
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
1 OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 6, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (jjpm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
P/HMHO/R1/60
957
659
2,260
23,300
25,100
1,370
37,600
56.35
P/HMHO/R1D/60
901
644
2,100
20,700
22,600
1,270
34,300
55.95
F/HMLO/R1/60
984
643
2,200
17,900
26,000
1,340
42,200
54.49
F/HMLO/R1D/60
1,330
850.
2,980
23,600
35,100
1,800
54,200
57.59
/^ 1_^
Approvec ^laboratory Manager
Accredited by the Amencar. Asscciaticr. Icr Laboratory Accreditatior. :r. the chemical
r.e.c ;• test.'-.s as lister: :r. ;he currer.' A.ALA D.rectc-/ o: Acrrea::ec La»cra;:.-es
-------
rra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
' l>
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2 )
PAGE 40 OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2D/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
27,000
<19,000 (5,300)
<19,000 (9,800)
Remarks: 19,000 » Quantisation limit.
NO = Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 1.90
Approved tor
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboralones
93-9-1
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 3Q OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
1,400,000
<100,000 (52,000)
<100,000 (25,000)
Remarks: 100,000
ND
Quantisation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
Values in
% Moisture = 11.35
Approvea by "
Laboratory Manager
Titie
Accrec:ted by the Amencar. Asscriaf.or. tor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemica:
93-9-e;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 37 OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2D/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
\,
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
350,000
<25,000 (5,700)
<25,000 (8,700)
Remarks: 25,000 = Quant1tation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitatlon limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 21.30
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 3ft OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
\
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
54,000
<18,000 (14,000)
<18,000 (6,900)
Remarks: 18,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 5.50
Values in
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboraiory Accreditation ir. the chemica.
"•e'Z c'. tes; r.? at hstea ir. the curren' AALA Director,' o: Accrea:ie- Larcrcror.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE___36_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2D/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexy!Jphthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(pg/kg dry weight)
<9,900 (1,400)
<9,900 (2,500)
<9,900 (3,700)
Remarks: 9,900 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 4.20
Approved by S
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lieid ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_35_ OF AT
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
720,000
<22,000 (13,000)
<22,000 (18,000)
Remarks: 22,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 21.93
Values in
Approved by
.aboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
t-e.d o.' ies':n:7 as lisle- ..-. the rurren' AALA Directory o! Accreci:'ec Laborcrones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
551 5 Midcliebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
33 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2D/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
M
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bi s(2-ethylhexy>)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
320,000
37,000
<12,000 (3,400)
Remarks: 12,000
NO
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
parenthesis are estimated.
Values in
% Moisture = 18.65
Approved by
, *e
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED: September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__34_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
\
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<9,600 (2,000)
<9,600 (4,400)
NO
Remarks: 9,600 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 3.98
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accreditec by the Amencan Association lor Laboralory Accreditation in the chemical
'.e a o: tes"-.2 as listed ir. the current AALA Directory ol Accreditea Labo-atores
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5315 .Vliddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
32 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2D/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexy!)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
<9,300 (3,500)
44,000
ND
Remarks: 9,300
ND
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
parenthesis are estimated.
Values in
% Moisture = 3.68
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field of testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8!
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED. September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_3J_ OF *1
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
97,000
52,000
<14,000 (6,800)
Remarks: 14,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 35.09
Approved by./
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lie:- :' tesv.r.a as hslec ir t'.e currer.1 AALA Directory o! Accredited Labcrcrcnes
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
-__-f s&> •
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__23__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2D/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
3,300,000
2,400,000
ND
\,
Remarks: 350,000 * Quantitation limit.
NO « Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
% Moisture • 44.39
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-B
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER. 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_3Q_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
<21,000 (14,000)
37,000
NO
Remarks: 21,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 4.00
Values in
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tie.a ol testir.g as listed in the current AALA Directory o: Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__ZZ_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2D/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phtha1ate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(wg/kg dry weight)
1,500,000
800,000
ND
Remarks: 190,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
% Moisture = 55.94
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
;;eld ol testing as listed :n the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboralones
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
.-"//
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER: 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__28_ OF *1
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethy1hexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
3,300,000
3,300,000
<41,000 (4,300)
Remarks: 41,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 53.26
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
;ieic c: tes':ng as nstec in the currer.! AALA Directory o; Accredited Laborotones
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5515 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
• PAGE__25_ OF _4J
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2D/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
.ug/kj dry weight)
1,100,000
370,000
ND
Remarks: 210,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
% Moisture = 55.46
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
2fL_ OF _4J _
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
2,200,000
780,000
<20,000 (2,400)
Remarks: 20,000
ND
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
Values in
% Moisture = 50.75
Approves by
Laboratory Manager
Titie
Accreaited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the chemical
;;e:c ol test.-.? as listed ir. the currer.' A-^iA D.rectory o'. Accrecited Lccorstc-r.e:
-------
nra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 .V.adietirook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED. September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE___23_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2D/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
9,500
1,400
ND
13,000
ND
1,500
23,000
Remarks:
310
ND
<
1
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 19.28
Approved by '
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation m the chemical
held o! testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
E53
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
?4 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
230,000
140,000
ND
Remarks: 16,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit,
% Moisture = 45.89
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association /or Laboralory Accreditation m the chemica:
ne.c i: testing as listed in the current AALA Directory oi Accredited Laboratones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Viddiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
-J.-SO _
- ~ --' i
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 9? OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2D/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
25,000
20.
ND
84
47
10.
190
Remarks: 5 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed,
% Moisture = 1.90
Approved by *
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED. September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_21_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
32,000
1,400
780
12,000
NO
1,400
23,000
Remarks: 280
ND
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 11.35
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Titje
Accredited by the Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation ;r. the chemical
'•e.~ c'
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 viidd'ebrook Pike • Knoxviile Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
I9__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2D/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
\,
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight!
2,500
180
25
1,500
390
200
2,600
Remarks:
13
ND
<
1
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 21.30
Approved
.
\t/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
field ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboraiones
93-9-8
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middiebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__20_ OF &1
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
6,100
<5 (4)
<5 (2)
18
ND
<5 (2)
35
Remarks: 5 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
1 = This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 5.50
Approved by y
Laboratory Manager
Titie
Accrea.iei by !he American Association lor Laboralory Accreditation in the chemica,
!:e.3 z' tesi.-.p as :is'6c .- the curren' AAJ_A. Direciory o; Accreciitec Laoorotones
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
58i 5 Yhddlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_LB_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2D/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
410
8
<5 (3)
30.
ND
<5 (4)
72
Remarks: 5
ND
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 4.20
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_12_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
2,800
280
43
2,600
710
260
4,600
Remarks:
6
NO
<
1
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 21.93
Approved y?
Laboratory Manager
Titie
Accreaned by the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica:
lie.: -' test.nj as listen in the curren- AALA. Directory o! Accredited Laborator.es
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Viadlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_JJ5_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2D/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,300
<6 (5)
<6 (3)
26
33
<6 (2)
110
Remarks: 6
ND
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 18.65
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held of testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
93-3-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__1£_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
X
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
1,500
14
<5 (1)
77
ND
8
110
Remarks: 5
ND
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 3.98
Laboratory Manager
T.tie
Accreaitei by Ihe American Assonat.or. lor Laboratory Accreditation :r. the cnerr.ica'.
lie a o' tes'..-g as iistec ir ire currer.: AA1A Direc'ory ot Accreaitec '..aDcrator.e;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
-3' 5 Vidaieorook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 14 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2D/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
650
<5 (2)
ND
6
8
ND
26
Remarks:
5 =
ND =
< =
i _
Quantisation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 3.68
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
held o! testing as listea in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__13_ OF A1
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2/10-60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(t g/kg dry weight)
1,000
8
<8 (3)
91
100
<8 (5)
300
Remarks:
8 =
ND =
< =
1 =
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 35.09
Approvea b'
Laboratory Manager
Accredited by (he Amencar. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation :r. the chemical
i.e.- o! test.np as iistea ;r. the current AALA Directory ot Accred-.teo Laboratone:
93-9-8J
-------
EEJ
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
:3'5 Miadlebrook Pike • Knoxvilie Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
>-n.v
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
JJ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2D/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
\7
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
200,000
48,000
49,000
600,000
120,000
94,000
1,000,000
Remarks:
2,200
ND
<
1
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 44.39
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE I TEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_JL2_ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2/10 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
520
ND
ND
<5 (4)
ND
ND
16
Remarks:
5 =
ND =
< =
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
Moisture = 4.00
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the America.- Association to: Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica:
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
581 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_9___ OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2D/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
4,300
740
17,000
2,500
1,600
25,000
(48)
Remarks: 110
NO
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantisation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 55.94
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE.
ORDER NUMBER.
PAGE-
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
in OF 41
Sample Description: F/HMHO/R2/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
170,000
150,000
32,000
1,500,000
270,000
240,000
2,400,000
Remarks: 2,700 = Quantisation Limit
ND = Not detected
= Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
= This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
<
1
% Moisture = 53.26
Approved b/
Laboratory Manager
Accredited fcy the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemicai
tiei: c' ies':*i5 as ::siec ir, ins curren: AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratories
93-9-er
-------
Detection Llnlts*
Seel-Vol
98 . lndcno( 1
99 . Di ben: ( fl
103. SenzoU
at 1 les
,2 , 3-cd )pyrenc
, h ) a nt h racene
, •(: , i ) pc ry 1 e nc
CAS Nunber
193-39-5
53-70-3
191-2i-2
Lou Ua;erc
UR/L
10
10
10
Lou Sol 1 /Sediner.: c
ug/Kp
330
330
330
cMediu- Water Contract Required Detection Llclts (CRDL) for Seci-Volat 1 le
HSL Cocpounds are 100 times the Individual Low Water CRDL.
!u= Sol 1/Sedloent Contract Required Detection Llnlts (CRDL) for Secl-
Volarile HSL Compounds are 60 tines the individual Low Soil/Sediment CRD1
E-44
-------
PestIcldes
Detection Llnl t s*
Low Water0Low Sol1/Sedlncnt1
CAS Nutabcr
ug/L
ug/Kg
101 . alpha-BHC
102. beta-BHC
319-84-6
319-85-7
0.05
0.05
6.0
6.0
103. delta-BHC"
104. ganma-BHC (Llndanc)
105. Heptachlor
106. Aldrln
107. Heptachlor Epoxide
108. Endosulfan I
109. Dleldrln
110. 4,4'-DDE
111. Endrin
112. Endosulfan II
113. 4,4'-DDD
114. Endosulfan Sulfate
115. 4,4'-DDT
116. Endrin Ketone
117. Methoxychlor
118. Chlordane
119. Toxaphene
120. AROCLOR-1016
121. AROCLOR-1221
122. AROCLOR-1232
123. AtfOCLOR-1242
124. AKOCLOR-124E
125. AROCLOR-1254
126. AROCLOR-1260
319-86-8
58-89-9
76-44-8
309-00-2
1024-57-3
959-98-8
60-57-1
72-55-9
72-20-8
33213-65-9
72-54-8
1031-07-8
50-29-3
53494-70-5
72-43-5
57-74-9
8001-35-2
12674-11-2
11104-28-2,
11141-16-5'
53469-21-9
12672-29-6
11097-69-1
11096-82-5
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1 .0
6.0
6.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
80.0
80.0
160.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
160.0
160.0
^ediun; Uater Contract Required Detection Limits (CRDL) for Pesticide KSL
Co=pounds are 100 tines the individual Lot.- Water CRDL.
D Soll/S«di=ent Contract Required Detection Li=lts (CRTL) for Pesticide
HSL coapounds are 15 tides the Individual Low Sol I/Sediment CRDL.
*Detection Units listed for soi1/sedinent are based or we: weight. The cetec-
tlon Units calculated by the laboratory for sol 1/sediser.t , caiculoied or. dr>
weight basis, as required by the contract, will be higher.
** Specific detection Halts are highly natrlx dependent. Tne detection
Units listed herein are provided for guidance and cay not alw«vs be
achievable.
E-45
-------
Detect 1 on Llmlts*
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41 .
42 .
43.
44 .
45.
46.
47 .
4S.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54
55.
56.
57 .
55.
c o
60.
61 .
62.
63.
Senl -Vola: lies
Phenol
bl6(2-Chloroechyl) ether
2-Chioro phenol
1 ,3-Dl chlor obcnr enc
1 ,4-Dlchloro benzene
Benzyl Alcohol
1 ,2-Di chlorobenrene
2-Hethy Iphenol
bi s(2-Chloroi6opropyl )
ether
4-S- :hy Iphenol
N-Ni t rose-Dip ropy lad ne
Hexachloroe thane
Kit robeazene
Isophorone
2-JCi t rophenol
2 ,4-Dlnethylphenol
Benzole Acid
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)
nethane
2 ,4-Dlchlorophenol
1 ,2 ,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroanlline
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro- 3 -aethy Iphenol
( para-chloro-ae ta-cresol)
2 -Me thy 1 naphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadlene
2 ,4 ,6-7rlchlorophenol
2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol
CAS Number
108-95-2
111-44-4
95-57-8
541-73-1
106-46-7
100-51-6
95-50-1
95-48-7
39638-32-9
106-44-5
621-64-7
67-72-1
98-95-3
78-59-1
88-75-5
105-67-9
65-85-0
111-91-1
120-83-2,
120-62-1 '
91-20-J-
106-47-8
87-66-3
59-50-7
91-57-6
77-47-4
8S-06-2
95-95-4
Lou Uaterc
ug/L
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
Lov.- Sol 1/Sed Imcnt^
U£/Kf
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1600
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1600
E-42
-------
DetectJ on "Liffii t:
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71 .
72.
73.
74 .
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82^
83.
8A-
;8S.
86.
£7.
D C
£9.
c i
91 .
92.
93.
94 .
95.
96.
97.
Sccl-Volatlles
2-Chloronapht ha lent-
2-N1 1 roanl 1 1 nc
Dimethyl Phthalatc
Acenaphthylece
3-N1 1 roani 1 Inc
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dlnltrophenol
4-Ni t rophenol
Dibenzof uran
2,4-Dlnitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl Pher.yl
ether
Fluorene
4-Ni troaniline
4 ,6-Dlni tro-2—aethylphehol
N-ni trosodi phenylaci ne
4-Brooophenyl Phenyl ether
He xach lore benzene
Pen t a ch lor o phenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Dl-n-butylphrhsla t e
Fluoranthene
P y r e n e
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
3,3'-Dichloroben;idlnc
Benzo(a)a nth race ne
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalste
Cnrysene
D:-n-octyl Phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthenc
B e n z o ( V. )fluoranthene
Benzo( a )py rene
CAS Number
91-58-7
88-74-4
131-11-3
208-96-8
99-09-2
83-32-9
51-28-5
100-02-7
132-64-9
121-14-2
606-20-2
84-66-2
7005-72-3
86-73-7
100-01-6
534-52-1
86-30-6
101-55-3
118-74-1
87-86-5
85-01-8
120-12-7'
84-74-2
206-44-0
129-00-0
85-68-7
91-94-1
56-55-3
117-81-7
218-01-9
117-84-0
205-99-2
207-08-9
50-32-8
Lou Waterc
ug/L
10
50
10
10
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Lou Soll/Sedlacruc
"C/^r.
330
1600
330
330
1600
330
1600
1600
330
330
330
330
330
330
1600
1600
330
330
330
1600
330
330
330
330
330
330
660
330
330
330
330
231
3 3 C
33C
E-43
-------
ATTACHMENT A
Hazardous Substance List. (HSL) and
Contract Required Detection Llclts (CRDL)**
1.
2 _
3.
i. .
5.
6~.
7."
8.
9.
10.
11.
-12^'
13.
14.
15.
16 .
1 / .
IS.
19.
20 .
2 1 .
22.
23-
24 .
25.
Volatiles
Chlorooethane
Brcrao^e thane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
)Acetone
Carbon Disulfi'de
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , i-Di chloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
ChloroforE
• 1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Buranone
1,1, 1-Tri chloroethane
Carbor. Tetrachloride
Viryl Acetate
_^ Broaodichloro^ethane
"1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
t rar.s -1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
DibroDoch lor one thane
1 , 1 ,2-Trlchloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichlorop^opene
CAS Sunber
74-87-3
74-63-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
75-09-2
67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-35-3
156-60-5
67-66-3.
107-06-2
78-93-3
71-55-6
56-23-5
10S-05-4
75-27-4
79-34-5
78-S7-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
124-45-1
79-00-5
71-43-2
10061-01-5
Low Water2
ug/L
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Low Soil/Sediser,:^
ug/Kg
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
E-40
-------
Detect Ion Linlts*
26-
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33".
34.
35.
V o 1 a t 1 1 c s
2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether
Bronof oro
2-Hexanone
4-Me thy 1-2 -pent a none
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
Total Xylenes
CAS NuEbor
110-75-8
75-25-2
591-78-6
108-10-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
Lou Water'"1
up/L
10
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
Low Sol 1 /Sec inert ''
u r. / K. r
10
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
aMediu= Water Contract Required Detection Limits (CRDL) for Volatile HSL
Compounds are 100 tloes the Individual Low Water CRDL.
"f
un Soil/Sediment Contract Required Detection Llnits (CRDL) for Volatile
Compounds are 100 tines the Individual Low Soil/Sediment CRDL.
E-41
-------
ATTACHMENT A
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST
AND
EPA ANALYTICAL METHODS
E-38
-------
The organics would be determined using methods 8240, 8270, and 8080 from the
third edition of SW-846. This target list and methodology is essentially the
same as that currently used for EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).
Data summaries, but not a full CLP data package, would be supplied.
HSL metals would be determined using method 7060 for arsenic, 7471, for
mercury, 7740 for selenium, and 6010 for the other 23 HSL metals. These
methods are not the current CLP protocol, but will produce data of equivalent
quality.
E-39
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
58'. 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 7 OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2D/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
4,500
25
150
150
11
520
(4)
Remarks: 11 = Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
1n parenthesis are estimated.
1 * This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 55.46
Approved 1
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__8__ OF _4J
Sample Description: F/HMLO/R2/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(uq/kg dry weight)
2,300
1,600
ND
22,000
3,600
2,700
37,000
Remarks: 51 - Quantitation Limit
ND = Not detected
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
1 = This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 50.75
Approved 1
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditalior. in the cnerr.icc:
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
^__-«i:s« _,
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE.
ORDER NUMBER-
PAGE-
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
_5 HF 41
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received August 10, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/HMHO/R2D/10
74.4
387
6.4
91.8
117
20.5
628
1.90
v
F/HMHO/R2D/10-60
89.8
212
29.6
310
314
51.5
2,690
19.28
Approved
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
lield ot testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__fi__ OF 41
Sample Description: F/LMLO/R2/60 (Soil) received August 10, 1987
VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
acetone1
chlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
ethyl benzene
styrene
tetrachloroethene
xylenes (total)
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
880
14
<9 (2)
110
100
<9 (7)
360
Remarks:
9 =
ND =
< =
1 _
Quantitation Limit
Not detected
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values
in parenthesis are estimated.
This component has a quantitation limit two (2) times that listed.
% Moisture = 45.89
Approved by/
Laboratory Manager
Titie
Accredited t>y the Amencar. Association tor Laooratory Accreditation ir. the chemica!
: ~ - ~' les"'.^ a= ,'.ste; :r. 'he CUTS-/ AAJ-A D're~c"v' o! Ac;red:tec Laooratone?
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxvilie. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
•^Jl4/
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
J OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 10, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMLO/R2D/10
2.9
2.2
1.9
9.9
7.0
4.7
33.8
3.68
F/LMLO/R2D/10-60
4.0
2.7
3.0
13.0
10.6
5.9
52.7
18.65
V
F/HMLO/R2/10
22.1
411
2.4
32.2
63.2
17.3
554
3.98
F/HMLO/R2/1Q-6C
54.6
114
10.1
112
130.
29.3
577
21.93
Approved by*'
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation m the chemical
field of testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8
-------
EE3
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
J OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 10, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/HMLO/R2D/10
51.1
168
3.9
45.1
133
17.7
445
4.20
F/HMLO/R2D/10-60
47.5
119
8.4
96.4
212
27.1
461
21.30
F/HMHO/R2/10
52.3
171
6.3
69.3
88.1
18.2
488
5.50
F/HMHO/R2/10-60
93.6
208
29.9
354
231
89.9
6,770
11.35
Approved j
Laboratory Manager
Tiiie
Accredited by the Amenccr Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the cherries.
I.e.3 o'. tes-.-.~ a? ::s'e~ :r t.-.e cJTer.1 AAl-A D.recto-y o: Accrecnec Laoorror.e;
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 M:ad!ebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24776
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
J OF^l
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 10, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
V
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/LMLO/R2/60
13.9
5.4
33.4
135
66.3
23.5
324
45.89
F/LMLO/R2D/60 F/HMLO/R2/6Q F/HMLO/R2D/60
11.4
9.6
106
342
154
62.6
769
55.46
197
106
1,450
1,920
1,400
374
5,450
289
115
2,420
2,580
1,540
570
8,080
50.75
55.94
ApprovedTDy
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middtebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 •615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED. September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24776
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__2__ OF 41
Sample Description: Four (4) soil samples received August 10, 1987
Concentration units are mg/kg (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
% Moisture
F/HMHO/R2/60
166
114
1,260
2,050
1,430
262
5,260
53.26
F/HMHO/R2D/60
193
99,
1,700
1,930
1,280
305
5,060
44.39
F/LMLO/R2/10
4.9
1.9
1.2
6.6
5.5
3.8
22.8
4.00
F/LMLO/R2/10-60
4.8
5.4
3.7
18.1
14.5
8.2
74.4
35.09
Approvec
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited bv the Amencar. Association lor Laboratory Accreditation ir. the cherr.ica.
'.e.c c' 'es".-.c cs ns'ec .r "ie cure'.' f^U-. D'.rec'c™/ o! Accres.'ei Lctcrc;ic"'.ei
-------
ESS
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
531 5 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 61 5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
ro IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 39 OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
420,000
17,000
48,000
Remarks: 12,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
% Moisture = 16.48
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held ol testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
93-9-8!
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE 41 OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
590,000
<12,000 (9,200)
41,000
Remarks: 12,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 17.89
Approved J
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accred.te^ cy 'he A^pericar Assc:iatior. to- Laboratory Accreditation in the crierr..cs'.
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
3ft OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
\1
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
15,000
<9,700 (4,900)
<9,700 (4,600)
Remarks: 9,700 * Quantisation limit.
NO * Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 5.24
Approved by •/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Ptke • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__4Q_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/HMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
<10,000 (8,500)
<10,000 (3,000)
<10,000 (3,300)
Remarks: 10,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 5.18
Approved by/
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
•:e - e- ies!.nc as hs'ec :r the carrer.' AALA Direr'?-;1 o: Accreditec Larcratcres
93-9-et
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
'•- B
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE^_3S_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
\j
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phtha1ate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yig/kg dry weight)
2,600,000
1,100,000
160,000
Remarks: 11,000 » Quantitation limit.
NO * Not detected.
< » Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit.
% Moisture - 16.50
(^ ^
^> A- /&*
Approved ty
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation m the chemical
tield ot testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
:-?»?
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__3i_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
4,900,000
1,700,000
<100,000 (57,000)
Remarks: 100,000 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 17.16
Laborat0ry Manager
TiUe
Accreaited By tne A.-nenccr. Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemica:
' e ~ c' ies' '.•: cs I'.s'e: .r :^e rjrre"' f-J^J-, D"ec'c~v' c! Accred.'es '_c:Eorc':~e?
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__3A_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethy!hexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(yg/kg dry weight)
27,000
<10,000 (4,300)
<10,000 (9,900)
Remarks: 10,000 » Quantitat1 on limit.
ND - Not detected.
< * Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 4.57
Approved by •
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association tor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
tield ot testing as listed in the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER
PAGE.
September 30, 1987
ITEC 24749
805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
36 OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMHO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
50,000
12,000
40,000
Remarks: 9,200 = Quantitation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit,
% Moisture = 2.91
Approved
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accreaitec. by the Amencar. Associat.or. tor Laboratory Accreditation :r. the cherr..ca'
: e.c c' lesrin? as lisiea :r. :r.e c-rrer.' AALA Direc'cr.' c: Acrrea.tec Lanoraior.es
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE. I TEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE__1L_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
44,000
42,000
<11,000 (6,700)
Remarks: 11,000
ND
Quantitation limit.
Not detected.
Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 14.37
Approved by y
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboratory Accreditation in the chemical
Held o! testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory of Accredited Laboratories
93-9-85
-------
rra
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2 )
PAGE 33 OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1D/10-60 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
77,000
58,000
<11,000 (7,800)
Remarks: 11,000 = Quantitation limit.
NO = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantisation limit. Values in
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 14.48
Approved
by
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE^_30_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
(ug/kg dry weight)
ND
44,000
ND
Remarks: 9,700 = Quantitat1on limit.
ND = Not detected.
< » Detected but at a level less than the quantltation limit
% Moisture = 5.19
Approvedby'
Laboratory Manager
Title
Accredited by the Amencan Association lor Laboralory Accreditation in the chemical
held ol testing, as listed in the current AALA Directory ot Accredited Laboratories
-------
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Barbara Locke
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
DATE REPORTED September 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEC 24749
ORDER NUMBER 805018 (PEI-3741-7-2)
PAGE_32_ OF 41
Sample Description: P/LMLO/R1D/10 (Soil) received August 5, 1987
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Compound
anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
pentachlorophenol
Concentration
dry weight)
ND
23,000
<10,000 (2,200)
Remarks: 10,000 = Quantisation limit.
ND = Not detected.
< = Detected but at a level less than the quantitation limit,
parenthesis are estimated.
% Moisture = 3.78
Values in
Approves
Laboratory Manager
Tide
Accreanei by the Amenccr. Association lor Laboratory Accreditatior. ir, tne chemica.
------- |