EPA-905/9-74-011-B
VOLUME 2 (APPENDICES)

                 US. BMRONMBirAL PROIKHON JIGMCY
                        REGION V BfORCHMDir DIVISION
              GREAT IAKESIHTIAIIVE CONTRACT PROGRAM
                                          OCTOBER, 1974

-------
WATER POLLUTION INVESTIGATION: CALUMET AREA
              OF LAKE MICHIGAN
                  VOLUME 2
                     by
               Richard H. Snow
            IIT RESEARCH  INSTITUTE
               In  fulfillment of
           EPA  Contract  No.  68-01-1576
                   for the
      U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                   Region V
    Great  Lakes  Initiative  Contract  Program
       Report  Number:  EPA-905/9-74-011-B
        EPA Project  Officer:  Howard  Zar
                 October 1974

-------
                            Table of Contents

                                Volume II
Appendix A     -     A REVIEW OF SELECTED RESEARCH ON THE BIOLOGY AND
                     SEDIMENTS OF SOUTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN WITH PARTICULAR
                     REFERENCE TO THE CALUMET AREA


Appendix B     -     THE ECOLOGY OF LAKE MICHIGAN ZOOPLANKTON -  A Review
                     with Special  Emphasis on the Calumet Area


Appendix C     -     DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT SOURCES  AND
                     COMPARISON OF EFFLUENT DATA
Appendix D     -     MUNICIPAL SOURCES AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS

-------
                                Table of Contents
                                    Volume I

 1.  INTRODUCTION, SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
 2.  DESCRIPTION OF AREA AND WATERSHED
 3.  FLOW DATA OF TRIBUTARY STREAMS
 4.  INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCES, OUTFALLS AND EFFLUENT DATA
 5.  MUNICIPAL SOURCES AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS
 6.  WATER QUALITY DATA
 7.  SEDIMENT POLLUTION AND BENTHIC ORGANISMS
 8.  IMPACT OF POLLUTANTS ON QUALITY AND USE OF WATER
 9.  BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF WATER QUALITY
10.  LAKE CURRENTS
11.  IITRI FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM AND DATA
12.  DISPERSION OF EFFLUENTS FROM INDIANA HARBOR CANAL (IHC)
13.  AMMONIA-NITROGEN
14.  PHENOLS
15.  OIL AND GREASE
16.  BACTERIAL POLLUTION
17.  PHOSPHORUS
18.  CHLORIDE AND SULFATE
References

-------
This report has been developed under auspices of the Great
Lakes Initiative Contract Program.  The purpose of the
Program is to obtain additional data regarding the present
nature and trends in water quality, aquatic life, and waste
loadings in areas of the Great Lakes with the worst water
pollution problems.   The data thus obtained is being used
to assist in the development of waste discharge permits
under provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act Amendments of 1972 and in meeting commitments under
the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement between the U.S.
and Canada for accelerated effort to abate and control
water pollution in the Great Lakes.

This report has been reviewed by the Enforcement Division,
Region V, Environmental Protection Agency and approved
for publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views of the Environmental  Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial  products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
 SHEET
                    1. Report No.
                        EPA-905/9-74-011-B
S.^Bc-cipient's Accession No.
 . Title And Subtitle
Water Pollution Investigation:  Calumet Area of  Lake Michigan

/olume 2  (Appendices)
                                                                      Report Date
                                                                        October 1974
                                                                    6.
 . Author(s)
 Richard H.  Snow
                                                                    8» Performing Organization Kept.
                                                                      No.
 . Performing Organization Name and Address

I IT Research Institute
 0 West  35th Street
 hicago,  Illinois  60616
                                                                    10. Pto)ect/Task/Work Unit No.
                                                                    11. Contract/Grant No.

                                                                           68-01-1576
 2. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
 J.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
 Enforcement Division, Region  V
230 S.  Dearborn Street
 hicago,  Illinois  60604
                                                                    13. Type of Report & Period
                                                                      Coveredpinal  Report

                                                                             (Appendices)
                                                                    u.
 5. Supplementary Notes

EPA Project Officer: Howard  Zar
 6. Abstracts An investigation  of the Calumet  area of Lake Michigan  was conducted.   The ob-
jective was to determine trends in water  quality, to determine  effluent loads  entering
the  Lake,  and to predict reductions in  effluents needed to  achieve Lake water  quality
standards.  The report  describes the status of industrial and municipal effluent sources
Effluent data were compiled from NPDES  permit applications  and  operating reports.   These
were checked by a field sampling program.
          Water quality  data were compiled from several sources.   We also conducted field
measurements in the  Indiana Harbor Canal  (IHC) and at 16  Lake stations.  We  located the
plume from the IHC by aerial observation  and by measurements using existing  pollutants
as tracers.  Current meters installed  in  the Lake for one month allowed us to  describe
the  mechanisms that  appear to govern dispersion of the IHC  plume.   The report  contains
chapters assessing the  impact of each  of  the more important pollutants, and  gives rec-
ommendations for reduction of some effluent loads.  Appendices  are included  on the
hinlngiral impart nf pollutants nn thp r.alnmpt arpa nf lakp Mirhigan	
17. Key Words and Document Analysis.  17a. Descriptors


        Water Quality Aquatic Biology,  Water Pollution
 17b. Idemifiers/Open-Ended Terms

        Calumet Area,  Indiana Harbor  Canal,  Lake Michigan,  Great Lakes,
        Chemical  Parameters, Biological  Parameters
17c. COSATI Field/Group
                           gp
 18. Availability Statement
                                                         19. Security Class (This
                                                           Report)
                                                              UNCLASSIFIEI)
                                                          20. Security Class (This
                                                            Page
                                                               UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                               21. No. of Pages
                                                                              22. Price
 FORM NTIS-35 (REV. 3-72)
                                  THIS FORM MAY BE REPRODUCED
                                                                               USCOMM-DC 14952-P72

-------
                    APPENDIX A
         A REVIEW OF SELECTED RESEARCH
         ON THE BIOLOGY AND SEDIMENTS
          OF SOUTHERN LAKE MICHIGAN
WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE CALUMET AREA
                        by
               Richard P. Howmiller
        Department of Biological Sciences
             University of California
         Santa Barbara, California 93106
                       A-l

-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                   Page

Introduction                                                   A-     3

Bacteria                                                              5

Algae                                                                11

   Phytoplankton Abundance

   Composition of the Plankton Flora                                 17

   Macroscopic Algae                                                 23

Sediments                                                            25

   Distribution of Sediment Types                                    25

   Evidence of Human Contamination of Sediments                      32

Benthic Macroinvertebrates                                           35

   Abundance of Major Components of the Lake Michigan Fauna          35

   The Value of Studies at the Species Level                         ^3

   Benthic Studies in the Calumet Area                               45

   Effects of Benthos on Sediment-Water Exchange                     61

Recommendations for Applied Research on the Benthos                  63
on the Calumet Area

   Species Distributional Patterns                                   63

   Effects of Benthos on Chemical Parameters                         65

Literature Cited                                                     68
                                A-2

-------
                              INTRODUCTION






     Effluents of municipalities and industries can have pronounced




ecological effects upon receiving waters.  They may, because of some




toxic components, eliminate many or most forms of life.  Large amounts




of oxygen-demanding organic matter may upset the oxygen regime, thus




greatly modifying the biological community.  Even non-toxic inorganic




components can be biologically important by serving as plant nutrients,




thus accelerating the process of eutrophication.




     The resulting biological changes may be of great importance because




of their economic impact.  Excessive growths of algae and aquatic plants




may increase the cost of municipal and industrial water treatment, and




may interfere with usual recreational uses of water.  Fish stocks usually




change in composition to less desirable, and economically less valuable,




species under the influence of pollution and eutrophication.




     Because the biota of lakes and rivers changes gradually with in-




creasing pollution and eutrophication, it is possible to assess the




quality of the aquatic environment through a study of the biota.  Much




publicity is currently being given to constant monitoring apparatus for




chemical parameters.  Biologists have made use of a natural constant-




monitoring system for many years, viz; the community of plants and




animals living in the water.




     This report is a review of literature on some components of the




biota of Lake Michigan.  It is, admittedly, a rather uneven treatment,




giving greatest attention to the invertebrate bottom fauna.  This is a




reflection of the particular interests and experience of the author.




Studies of the zooplanktpn are omitted entirely from this review, being
                                A-3

-------
the subject of a similar report by Gannon (1973).




     The following pages place particular emphasis  on knowledge  of  the




south-western corner of the lake.   The author has attempted to point  out




changes in the biota which may be  related to pollution and/or eutrophica-




tion, especially that related to pollutants originating in the Calumet




area.
                                A-4

-------
                                BACTERIA






     The natural bacterial flora of lakes remains relatively little




studied and information on the bacteria of Lake Michigan, other than




those of sewage origin, is limited.




     Scarce (1965) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration




(FWPCA 1968b) reported results of a study of 4100 samples from city




harbors and 1200 samples from inshore area (within 10 miles of shore).




Three families were most common, Achromobacteriaceae,  Pseudomonaceae,




and Eubacteriaceae.  The Achromobacteriaceae were most prevalent,




accounting for 95 to 99 per cent of the colonies examined from plates




incubated at 20 and 35°C.  Each family was represented by several genera.




It is questionable to what extent the study presents a true picture of




the lake's normal bacterial flora.  Methods involving culturing are




selective for those species well adapted to grow on the media used and




under the oxygen and temperature conditions established during incubation




(Scarce 1965, Robohm and Graikowski 1966).  It has also become obvious




that culture methods grossly underestimate density as established by




direct counts (Bell and Dutka 1972).




     Considerable more effort has been devoted to studies of abundance




and distribution of bacteria of sewage origin.  For the most part these




investigations have been concerned with "coliform bacteria", believed




largely to be represented by Escherichia coli, a species which is not




normally pathogenic itself but which is indicative of recent fecal con-




tamination of the water and, therefore, of the possible presence of




pathogens.




     Damann (1960) reported upon counts of coliform bacteria from a
                                A-5

-------
Chicago water intake during the period 1926-1958.  Methods used for
estimating numbers apparently remained unchanged over this period.
Highest annual average numbers were reported in 1940, 1941 and 1942  (Most
Probable Number (MPN) 180, 222, and 250 per 100 milliliters, respectively)
Damann saw fit to remark that it was during this period that, due to  the
demands of World War II, industry in the region was undergoing great
expansion.  Lowest annual average numbers occurred in 1950, 1952, and
1954 (MPN; 7, 7, and 8 per 100 ml).  There was an apparent trend of
decreasing coliform numbers, with an annual average MPN for 1926-1942 of
70 per 100 milliliters but for the period 1943-1958 of only 23 per 100
milliliters.  The trend proved not significant at the 0.01% level,
however (Fig. A-l).
     Scarce (1965) discussed results of coliform counts on samples from
313 stations in the southern basin of Lake Michigan.   Samples from off-
shore stations had little or (usually)  no coliform content.  Highest
coliform densities occurred with greatest frequency near centers of
urbanization along the western shore.   For example, surface samples from
10 nearshore stations between the northern limit of Chicago and the
eastern end of Gary,  Indiana contained the following coliform densities:

             estimated coliform       number of
                 density              stations
              (cells/100 ml)          in range
                  <1                      1
                 1-10                    2
                11-100                   2
               110-1000                  4
              1100-2000                  1
                                    z. = 10
                                A-6

-------
o
2300

-------
     The average density here would obviously be much higher than what




one would expect from the data presented by Damann (1960) and the




discrepancy may reflect differences in methodology.  Other recent reports




indicate that high coliform bacteria concentrations occur frequently at




several water intakes and most beaches along southwestern Lake Michigan




(Holleyman 1960, FWPCA 1968b) .  For example, Rainbow Beach and Calumet




Park Beaches failed to meet the joint federal-state criteria for bacterial




levels approximately 66% of the time during 1966, 20% of the time during




1967, and 33% of the time during 1968.  Some beaches had even worse




records (FWPCA 1968c).  High coliform bacteria counts in this area occur




mostly under conditions of onshore winds following heavy precipitation




(Holleyman 1968).




     Scarce and Peterson (1966) investigated the coliform abundance and




the incidence of selected pathogenic bacteria in several streams of the




Chicago and Calumet area.  The waters studied are regularly or occasion-




ally tributary to Lake Michigan.  Results reflected gross pollution of




sewage origin.  Total coliform geometric mean densities ranged to almost




700,000 per 100 ml in the Sanitary and Ship Canal.  Individual determin-




ations ran as high as 25,000,000 per 100 ml in this waterway.  A station




on the Grand Calumet River had a geometric mean coliform density of




3,000,000 per 100 ml and fecal streptococcus concentrations as high as




260,000 per 100 ml.  Salmonellae were present throughout the stream




systems investigated.  These included 23 strains, all pathogenic.




Pathogenic enteroviruses were found in 27 per cent of the stream samples.




It is easy to understand why intolerable bacterial densities in the lake




follow heavy rains which accelerate flushing of these water courses.
                                A-8

-------
     High numbers of coliforms and pathogens of fecal origin would not




persist for long in the lake if it were not for continuing inputs.




Hedrick, Meyer and Kossoy  (1962) studied the survival of JE. coll.,




Salmonella typhosa, S_. paratyphi, S^. schottmue11er i, Shigella dysenteriae,




^5. paradysenteriae, and j^. sonnei using pure cultures and sterile-filtered




Lake Michigan water obtained at the South District Filtration Plant  in




Chicago.  All but the first of these are enteric parasites and pathogens.




With few exceptions, they  found substantial mortality of these bacteria




within  24 hr.  They attributed this to a toxic factor in the lake water




since corresponding studies employing well water resulted in smaller




decreases or increases in  bacterial numbers.  With the possible  exception




of Salmonella schottmuelleri, the enteric pathogens were more sensitive




to the  toxic factors in Lake Michigan water than was 15. coli.  In general,




the Shigella strains, Salmonella typhosa and j^. paratyphi usually under-




went at least a 50% reduction of numbers within 24 hr, while S^.




schottmuelleri and IS. coli either grew or suffered less than a 50% loss




in 24 hr.




     At the same time, Hedrick, Meyer and KossOy (1962) also studied the




survival of coliform bacteria present in untreated water from the South




District Plant.  During the period July 1952 - Sept. 1953 they found




great reduction in numbers of coliforms during 24 hr.  However,  in the




winter  and early spring of 1954 there was very little loss of coliforms




during  their 24 hr experiments.  Comparison of their data with that  of




earlier studies (Noble and Gullans 1955) showed that the short survival




times are the usual case in Lake Michigan.




     Results from winter and spring of 1954 are unusual but remain unex-




plained.
                                A-9

-------
     Survival of JE. coli and EL schottmuelleri in the first-mentioned




series of experiments paralleled very closely the behavior of the




coliforms in the tests with untreated lake water.  Thus it seems that the




"toxic factor" in Lake Michigan water is at times less effective at




reducing numbers of coliforms and S^. schottmue 11 eri but even on these




rare occasions, numbers of many important pathogens are quickly reduced.
                               A-10

-------
                                  ALGAE






Phytoplankton Abundance




     The FWPCA  (1968a) reported that in 1962-63 deep-water  (open lake)




areas supported low abundance of phytoplankton, generally in the range




100-300 organisms/ml.  Nutrient rich inshore areas, on the  other hand,




generally had abundances exceeding 500/ml.  (Fig. A-2,3,4).  Phytoplankton




were very abundant in the Chicago-Calumet area with densities reaching




1298/ml in 1962 and 2,143 in 1963.




     Beeton  (1969) reported that open lake plankton abundance has gener-




ally been about 1/3 that at the Chicago intake.




     It is obvious from Figures A-2,3 and 4 that the southwestern corner




of the lake was, in 1962-63, unique in having high phytoplankton densities




in both spring and fall.  Other inshore areas on the western side of the




southern basin had peak densities in fall while along the eastern and




northwestern shores the peak came in spring.




     This may represent a regular difference in the annual  cycle of




abundance in these areas.  Damann (1966) pointed out that over a period




of many years phytoplankton sampled at Chicago has had two peaks of




abundance annually while abundance was unimodal at Milwaukee and in the




open lake.   It is difficult to know what importance to ascribe to this




observation, other than that the Chicago area seems a unique area in




Lake Michigan.  More recently, Holland (1969) has observed a bimodality in




diatom   abundance in Green Bay, the most eutrophic area of Lake Michigan.




Beeton (1969) feels that a bimodal cycle of phytoplankton abundance may




be characteristic of more productive areas in the Great Lakes.




     Data from the Chicago water intake show that phytoplankton abundance
                                A-ll

-------
                                                                    NORTH
MILWAUKEE

ii:ii::ii:i:i- Racine
                                                          O-300/ml.

                                                          300-500/ml.

                                                          over 5OO/ml.
                                                                  25
                                                            MILE

                                              Figure A~2.  Showing phytoplankton
                                              abundance as numbers per milliliter
                                              in Lake Michigan during Spring 1962.
                                              Figure taken from FWPCA (1968a).
                                         A-12

-------
ll!:!!  s (r  -::::::::::!!::i:i!:!ii!!"!:!"i:!"""lii
                         I   I 0-30O/ml.
                              300-500/ml
                              ovw 500/ml.
                 Figure A-3.   Showing phytoplankton
                 abundance  as numbers per milliliter
                 in Lake Michigan during Summer  1962.
                 Figure taken from FWPCA (1968a).
           A-13

-------
               I   1  0-300/ml.

                    300-50O/ml.

                    over 5OO/ml.
                   O        25
                   l i i  •  •  l
                       MILE
        Figure A-4 .   Showing phytoplankton
        abundance as  numbers per milliliter
        in Lake Michigan during Fall 1962.
        Figure taken  from FWPCA (1968a).
A-14

-------
increased at an average of 13  organisms/ml  per year during the period




1926 to 1958 (Fig.  A-5, Damann 1960).
                               A-15

-------
z  17--
Ul
O.
S  15
cc
Q

3
X
     ..  TOTAL PLANKTON

   13"
   II --
    9--
    1926  28 30 32  34 36 38 
-------
Composition of  the Plankton Flora




     In reviewing studies of  the Lake Michigan phytoplankton, Davis  (1966)




drew attention  to the nearly  unanimous  agreement of  investigators  that




diatoms dominate the flora.   For example, he  cites Damann  (1945) who




reported  that diatoms constituted  an average  of 94%  of  the phytoplanktets




over the  course of the year of his  study and  at no time accounted  for




less than 89% of the total.




     The  dominant diatoms of  open  Lake  Michigan are  Fragilaria crotonensis,




Melosira  islandica, Tabellaria flocculosa, Asterionella formosa, Cyclotella




stelligera and  C^. michiganiana (Holland 1969).  This is very clearly an




oligotrophic flora (Rawson 1956, Beeton 1965).




     To some extent the extreme dominance of  diatoms may represent an




artifact  of the methods used  by most of those who have  studied the Lake




Michigan  phytoplankton.  Recent work done with special  attention to other




elements  of the flora indicates that diatoms  are frequently not dominant,




at least  in some inshore waters (Claflin and  Beeton  1972).  Algae other




than diatoms which Davis (1966) reported to be abundant at times include;




Dinobryon, Ceratium, Anacystis, Chrooccus and Oocystis.




     It is becoming clear from recent studies that the  flora of inshore




waters may differ greatly from that in  the main body  of the lake (Holland




and Beeton, 1972) .  Stoermer  (1968) reported  on pronounced inshore (less




than 4 mi  from  shore)-offshore differences.   He attributed these to a




horizontal thermal discontinuity ("thermal bar") which was present during




his two day study.  Holland (1968,  1969) found several species of diatoms




(Diatoma  tenue v. elongatum,  Fragilaria crotonensis,  Melosira ambigua,




Stephanodiscus tenuis,  Tabellaria flocculosa)  more abundant inshore than




offshore during the period April -  November 1965.   Furthermore,  generation
                                 A-17

-------
times were less inshore than offshore.  Obviously, these inshore-offshore




differences are not exclusively short-term phenomena associated with




thermal bars.  The differences in distribution, abundance, and generation




times of diatoms were related to inshore-offshore differences in nutrients.




More recent studies (Beeton 1970) continue to illuminate great differences.




These inshore-offshore differences are being emphasized because much of




our knowledge of Lake Michigan plankton has resulted from studies of




samples taken from municipal water intakes which are invariably located




within a mile or two from shore.  It is important to realize that results




of such studies may not be validly extrapolated to the lake as a whole.




The results are nevertheless important, for it is the inshore waters




which serve most of our esthetic and recreational needs, from which we




draw water, and where much commercial fishing is done.  In terms of our




interest in the Calumet area, knowledge of these pronounced inshore-




offshore differences indicates that the only studies having direct rele-




vance will be those done within a few miles of shore in the southern end




of the lake.




     Stoermer and Yang (1970) examined over 900 Lake Michigan phytoplank-




ton samples collected between 1876 and 1967.  They give a detailed account




of the distribution and relative abundance of the dominant planktonic




diatoms of the lake and have documented floristic changes during this 90




year period.  They found that those diatoms which are favored by eutrophic




conditions have increased in relative abundance in recent years.   Changes




in the diatom flora of the lake appeared first in nearshore waters and




virtually all nearshore waters now have a flora radically different from




that indicated by the earliest samples.  Collections from the Chicago




area in 1876-1881 contained most of the species which now are found
                                A-18

-------
exclusively in the open lake, although some of the species which are now




characteristic of inshore waters were also present.  This pattern, of new




introductions to the flora appearing first in nearshore waters and later




spreading to the open lake, was taken by Stoemer and Yang C1970) as




evidence that the changes are caused by nutrient pollution and not natural




phenomena.  They predicted further changes in the flora, with perennial




and oligotrophic species being replaced by seasonal species more favored




by mesotrophic or eutrophic conditions.  It was estimated that within




10-20 years changes may have progressed to the point where offshore




diatom blooms would be considered esthetically objectionable.  The authors




did point out, however, that this was a very tenuous estimate because of




the possibility that changing chemical conditions will result in a flora




dominated by algae other than diatoms.




     Itecent experimental work by Schelske and Stoermer (1971, 1972) pro-




vides evidence that silica is sometimes limiting the growth of diatoms




in Lake Michigan.  Phosphorus, presumably the usual limiting nutrient at




most times in the past, has been added to the lake in such quantities




that it has allowed diatoms to grow up to the level of available silica.




Relative to the needs of diatoms, phosphorus enters the lake in much




greater quantities than does silica.  The ratios indicate that 10 to 20




times more phosphorus is being added to the lake than can be utilized




with present inputs of silica (Schelske and Callender 1970, Schelske and




Stoermer 1972).  Thus it can be expected that the composition of the




planktonic flora will shift from near complete dominance of diatoms to




a greater proportion of the less desirable nonsiliceous green and blue-




green algae.  Evidence indicates that this is happening (Schelske and




Stoermer 1972).
                                 A-19

-------
     Major changes can be expected to occur first in the southwestern




section of the lake.  During the summer of 1969, the lowest concentrations




of silicon were found in surface samples taken at the southern end of the




lake (Schelske and Callender 1970).  Powers and Ayers (1967) found the




lowest concentrations of silicon at Chicago in an analysis of records




kept for municipal water intakes.  The Chicago records, as well as those




from other areas, show decreasing concentrations with time (Fig. A-6).




     Abundant plankters of certain taxa have caused problems for water




supply arouni southern Lake Michigan.  Dinobryon has been cited as the




cause of "fishy" odor in the Chicago water supply (Baylis 1951).




Tabellaria, and several other genera of diatoms, have caused problems of




filter-clogging (Baylis 1954, 1957, 1960).  Two diatoms not previously




reported from Lake Michigan, Stephanodiscus hantzschii and S^. binderanus




(M. binderana?) have become abundant enough at the Chicago intake to




cause further filter clogging problems in recent years (Vaughn 1961).




     Blooms and filter clogging by _S_. hantzschii, and perhaps also _§_.




binderanus, were correlated with periods when a fine turbidity occurred




in raw and finished  (filtered) water.  This turbidity was caused by small




cuboidal crystals of calcium carbonate and the conclusion reached was




that it was caused by the diatom blooms.  It was surmized that  the dense




blooms used up available free CCL and then used bicarbonate as a CO-




source* resulting in the precipitation of carbonate.  This theory was




supported  by observed changes in pH and alkalinity  (Vaughn 1961).




     Ayers, Stoermer aad McWilliam (1967) observed  "milky water" in




several cruises on  five cross-lake transects between Chicago and Frankfort,




Michigan.  They found some evidence that  this condition occurred period-




ically as  far back  as 1954 but  suggested  that it had become more pro-
                                A-20

-------
  14-


E12-
gioH

  8-

  6-

  4—
   Q 	


&  6H
Q.

   4


*  2H
   8 —

E  S
a  ^
   o-H
                                                     GRAND RAPIDS
                                                       MILWAUKEE
                                                         CHICAGO
       I   I   I   I   I  I   I   I   I   I   I   T   I   I   pi  I   I   I   I
      26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64
                                 YEARS
Figure A-6.   Silica concentration at water  intakes of Grand Rapids,
Milwaukee,  and Chicago plotted against time for the periods of
existing records.   (Figure taken from Powers and Ayers 1967.)
                                A-21

-------
nounced in the period 1964-1966.  "Milky water" was again observed  at




stations off Chicago in the summer of 1969 (Schelske and Callender  1970).




Ayers, Stoermer and McWillians hypothesized that the cause of this  tur-




bidity was fine particles of calcium carbonate formed when diatoms  used




bicarbonate as a CCL source.  The situation is thus possibly the same




as that observed by Vaughn (1961) and illustrates again that phenomena




observed in degraded inshore waters may be anticipated soon the open




lake if eutrophication continues at its present rate. We have, in the




southern end of the lake, a large-scale nutrient enrichment experiment




and to use the terms chosen by C. H. Mortimer (discussion to Schelske




and Stoermer 1972) the Chicago intake might be considered a useful  "early




warning system".




     Phytoplankton abundance in Lake Michigan, even in southern Lake




Michigan, is low compared to Lake Erie.  There is no doubt that phyto-




plankton would increase in abundance with accelerated eutrophication and




that, consequently, problems of objectionable tastes and odors and  filter-




clogging would become more frequent and more severe.  This would be




particularly true if, as has been predicted,  further inputs of phosphorus




result in depletion of silica by excessive diatom growths and the flora




shifts to one dominated by glue-green algae.   Blue-greens are typical of




eutrophic situations and are notorious for creating taste and odor prob-




lems and the clogging of filters.
                                 A-22

-------
Macroscopic Algae




     According to the FWPCA (1968a),the Chicago Park District has, for




several years, experienced problems with fouling of beaches by algae




washed in from the lake.  In 1961, the offending organism at Oak Street




and Montrose beaches was found to be Dichotomospiphon, a green filamentous




alga.  In 1962 the green alga Cladophora glomerata was the principal




species involved but Qedogonium was also present (FWPCA 1968a).  All of




these organisms require a firm substrate and thus do not grow on the




beach but are washed up there when luxuriant growths are broken loose




during heavy weather.  The resulting windrows of algae become foul-




smelling after a few days in the summer heat.  Flies and other insects




become very abundant in the decaying masses (FWPCA 1968a).  The unesthetic




appearance of the decaying algae, as well as the resultant odor and




swarms of insects, obviously detract from the recreational value of the




beaches.




     Cladophora has, since the 1950*s become an important algal nuisance




in lakes Erie and Ontario as well as in southern Lake Michigan.   Herbst




(1969) reported Cladophora very abundant (problem conditions) near




Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha, Chicago, Michigan City and Benton Harbor.




He found only sparse growths, small in extent, along northern shores of




Lake Michigan.




     The distribution of Cladophora is correlated with nutrient-rich




water, it being rare in the upper lakes except near centers of population.




Herbst (1969) considered phosphorus to be the limiting nutrient in most




situations.  Application of phosphorus to suitable locations in Lake




Huron, which were otherwise devoid of Cladophora, resulted in its estab-




lishment and subsequent growth (Neil and Owen 1964).  Mechanical removal
                                 A-23

-------
and the use of algicides have effected temporary control of Cladopbora




in local situations (McLarty 1961).  Considering the magnitude of the




problem growths, however, and the possible side-effects of applications




of biocides, tertiary treatment of effluents for phosphorus removal seems




the only feasible control measure (Herbst 1969).  We can expect continuing




problem growths of Cladophora in direct proportion to the input of




nutrients, especially phosphorus.
                                 A-24

-------
                               SEDIMENTS






Distribution of sediment types




     The surficial bottom sediments of Lake Michigan have been described




by Hough (1935), Ayers and Hough (1964), Ayers (1967), Powers and Robertson




(1967, 1968), Somers and Josephson (1968).Mozley and Alley (1973) and




other authors.  Of interest in the present context are comments on the




distribution of sediment types in the southern end of the lake as this




may have some bearing on consideration of the distribution and sampling




of benthic invertebrates.  Reports of contamination of sediments are, of




course, also of value.  The following discussion will thus rely heavily




on those few papers which provide the greatest detail in describing the




sediments of the southern end of the lake.




     Ayers (1967) reported on the distribution of sediment types as based




on a "Field description" at the time of collection.  He recognized 12




categories of sediment, mostly on the basis of texture.  Figure A-7,




taken from Ayers1 paper,shows that sediments of the southwestern corner




of the lake range from silty sand to till, with fine to coarse sands




covering most of the area.




     Somers and Josephson (1968) published a paper based upon mechanical




analysis of the same samples described by Ayers (1967).  They include a




map of sediment distribution patterns which is essentially identical to




Figure A-7 , except that they have lumped Ayers' several classes of sand,




silt and clay under these three simple headings.  For the area of our




concern conclusions remain the same; bottom sediments are "hard" over




most of the area, consisting largely of sand with small areas of gravel




and till.
                                A--25

-------
Explanation of symbols used in Figure A-7
on facing page.  From Ayers (1967).
           No Sample  (Hard Bottom?)


           Till


   V_/      Gravel  (Granules to Boulders)


           Coarse  to  Very Coarse Sand


   •      Medium  Sand


   LJ      Very Fine  to Fine Sand


           Silty Sand


   >J(      Clayey  Sand


           Sandy Silt


           Sandy Clay


           Silty Clay


   V      Clayey  Silt


   ^      "Clay"
                    A-26

-------
            87*50"        87*40'        87*30'       87*20" 	87*10'
4Z*
 10'
42*
 00"
40
                                                                                                       LAKE MICHIGAN

                                                                                                  SURFICIAU BOTTOM SEDtMf NTS

                                                                                                  CONTOUR INTERVAL 60 FEET
                                              OAR
                                   _L
                                                         _L
                                                                     _L
                                                                                _!_
                                                                                           _L
            87*50"        87*40"       87*30"       87*20"        87*10"        87*00"       WSff        86*40
                                                                                                                 86*tO"
      Figure  A-7.  Distribution of  surficial  sediment types in  the southern end of Lake Michigan.
      Symbols are explained  on previous  (facing) page.  Figure  taken  from Ayers (1967).

-------
     Somers and Josephson (1968) also plotted phi median diameter and




measures of deviation, and skewness of phi (Inman, 1952) against depth




for all transects.  In the Chicago-Gary area, in contrast to many parts




of the lake, there was no consistent relationship between these measures




and depth of distance from shore.




     Mozley and Alley (1973) present a map of the distribution of sedi-




ment types in the southern end of the lake which is based on Ayers (1967)




data as well as additional observations of their own (Fig. A-8).  Their




map gives less detail and differs in some important respects from that




of Ayers (1967).  For example, Mozley and Alley indicate that gravel is




the dominant sediment type in the inshore area north and west of Gary,




Indiana.  Ayers' map shows a good deal of sand in this area.  Perhaps




Mozley and Alley felt that the greater detail of Ayers map was unwarranted




since they found that the sediment type at many stations varied from




cruise to cruise.  For example at one station about 30 km off Gary,




Indiana the recorded sediment type was gravel once, fine sand once, silty




sand five times, and sandy silt once.  This observation may simply indi-




cate lack of precision in locating the station or may reflect periodic




movements of surficial sediments in the shallower waters of southern




Lake Michigan.  The generally poor sorting observed by Somers and




Josephson (1968) and comments by these authors and Hough (1935) appear




to support the latter explanation.  Certainly there are many important




sources of sediment along the southern shore of the lake, yet fine sedi-




ments are rarely found at shallower depths.  Poor sorting and patchiness




of sediments in the southern basin may result from a seasonal cycle




involving large inputs of finer sediments with spring runoff and temporary




deposition of this sediment in shallow areas followed by resuspension and
                                 A-28

-------
    Waukegan
                                                                               Benton Harbor
VO
                                                                                         South
                                                                                         Haven
SEDIMENT CODES

              4
             Kilometers
                                    Gory
.
A
» • • • i
» » • • i









            Figure A-8.  Distribution of sediment types in the south end of Lake Michigan according to
            Mozley and Alley (1973).  Sediment codes: 1 = gravel, pebbles; 2 = coarse or medium sand;
            3 = clean fine sand; 4 = silty sand; 5 = sandy silt;  6 = silt, clay.  Figure taken from
            Mozley and Alley (1973).

-------
transport to greater depths by storm currents in fall and winter.




     The distribution of sediment types in the Calumet-Indiana Harbor




area (Fig. A-9 ) reflects substantial inputs of finer materials by the




streams.  The silts and clays are found largely at or just off stream




mouths.  Other areas have coarser sediments, presumably because of




removal of finer materials by lake currents.
                                 A-30

-------

KEY:
  Grovel

  Coarse to Medium Sand

  Fine Sand

  Silt & Clay
       Figure A~9.  .Distribution of sediment  types in the Calumet-Indiana
       Harbor area; «'• Based on unpublished  data obtained by the FWPCA in 1967.
                                         A-31

-------
Evidence of Human Contamination of Sediments




     Some of the bottom samples examined by Somers and Josephson  (1968)




and Mozley and Alley (1973) had an oily odor.  This may result from




dumping of petroleum products in the lake either directly or through the




open-lake disposal of dredging spoils from harbors.  Other samples




examined by Somers and Josephson (1968) contained cinders, wood, ceramic




tile, rusty nails, and other evidence of recent dumping.  These authors




did not give any further indication of the location or extent of affected




sediments.




     Oil pollution in Lake Michigan occurs primarily at the southern end,




originating in the Calumet area.  Indiana Harbor canal sediments have




been found (June 1967) to have oil and grease contents ranging from 3 to




17%  (Johnson ^t al. 1968).  The FWPCA  (1968) reported that waste discharges




in harbors along the southern shore resulted in sediments which were




inhibitory to the establishment of benthic organism populations.  They




referred specifically to oil, grease, and allied petroleum wastes as the




source of the problem.




     Mozley and Alley (1973) reported that comparison of oily samples




and non-oily samples from the same Lake Michigan stations revealed no




strong or consistent effect on the benthos, though in a few such cases




oligochaetes made up a larger percentage of the fauna in the oily sample.




     Gannon and Beeton (1969, 1971) pursued this problem through labora-




tory investigations, using sediments from nine Great Lakes harbors.  In




selectivity tests Pontoporeia affinis avoided Indiana Harbor sediments




and displayed a lower preference for Calumet Harbor sediments when com-




pared to sediments from an unpolluted harbor and the open lake.  In




viability tests, Calumet and Indiana harbors were among the five harbors
                                 A-32

-------
whose sediments caused greatest mortality of £. affinis.  Gannon and




Seeton (1969, 1971) concluded that sediments from these harbors were so




toxic that dredging spoils should not be dumped in the open lake.  While




they did not attempt to identify the toxic substance(s) involved, the




Calumet and Indiana Harbor samples used in the tests were obviously




polluted with oil.




     Shimp, Leland and White  (1970) and Shimp e£ al. (1971) have studied




the vertical distribution of trace elements in cores taken in southern




Lake Michigan.  In many cores, concentrations of bromine, chromium,




copper, lead and zinc, were much higher in the upper few centimeters than




at greater depths in the cores.  Patterns of concentration with depth




suggest continuing increases in deposition of these trace elements.  On




a geographical basis, highest concentrations in the most recent sediments




were generally off Grand Haven or Benton Harbor, Michigan.  Except for




zinc, and chromium at a few stations, concentrations in the Calumet area




were not particularly high when compared to the southern basin as a whole.




Shimp and co-workers (1970, 1971) did not look for biological effects of




accumulation of these trace elements, and other research on the benthos




of the open lake has given no indications that any have built up to




harmful levels.




     In the immediate area of Calumet and Indiana Harbors there are high



concentrations of many pollutants, several of which could have been




responsible for the toxicity observed by Gannon and Beeton (1969, 1971).




The distribution pattern strongly suggests that the pollutants enter in




the two tributary streams (Fig. A-10).
                                  A-33

-------

-------
                       BENl'HIC MACROINVERTEBRATES






Abundance of Major Components of the Lakejlichigan Fauna




     Numerous studies of the benthos of Lake Michigan have shown that the




fauna is dominated by amphipods (Pontoporeia affinis) and oligochaete




worms (most importantly Stylodrilus heringianus; Hiltunen 1967, Howmiller




1972).  Sphaeriid clams are third in abundance  (two genera; 23 spe-




cies). Other invertebrates; mysids, isopods, leeches, snails, flatworms,




roundwormsj and midge larvae occur in small numbers.




     Many of the benthic studies done on the lake have focused on the




distribution and abundance of the dominant elements of the fauna.  In an




extensive investigation, involving sampling in several months on five




cross-lake transects, Powers and Robertson (1965) estimated average numbers




of amphipods, and of oligochaetes, and the ratio of the two.  Their data




indicate that the southern portion of the lake has somewhat lower densities




of amphipods, much larger numbers of oligochaetes (Fig. A-11),, and amphipod/




oligochaete ratios much lower (Fig. A-12)than in other regions of the




lake.  Verber (1966) cites data of Cook (1965)  which reflect similar




distributions and says that Cook has reported a significant change in the




amphipod/oligochaete ratio in the last 30 years.  Robertson and Alley




(1966) compared the abundance of dominant benthic organisms in 1964 with




the data of Eggleton (1931, 1932).  They found 1.5 times more Pontoporeia,




2.6 times more oligochaetes, and 4.3 times more sphaeriids in 1964.  Thus




the amphipod/oligochaete abundance ratio decreased, on the average, to
1
  Cook's report was not available to me, and is apparently unpublished.
                                 A-35

-------
Wisconsin


Illinois
                                                     Michigan

                                                     Indiana
                      •gs
                      G I cfl
                      •H I -H
                      rH 'TJ
                      rH  0
      Figure A-ll. Average numbers of  oligochaete worms,  1000's/m  , August  -



      November  1964,  in  the benthos  of Lake Michigan  south  of Milwaukee-Grand



      Haven.   (After  Powers and Robertson  1965).
                                       A-36

-------
Wisconsin
Illinois
                                                  Michigan

                                                  Indiana
   Figure A-12. Average distribution of the ratio of numbers of amphipods

   to numbers of oligochaetes, August - November 1964, in the benthos of

   Lake Michigan 'south of Milwaukee-Grand Haven (After Powers and Robertson

   1965).
                                     A-37

-------
about 0.6 of the value in 1931-32.


     There seems to be an implication in the comments of Verber (1966)


that the amphipod/oligochaete ratio has significance as an indicator of


environmental quality, and that the reported change in this ratio reflects


some deterioration of the lake.  This opinion is given support by the


results of Robertson and Alley, since a decrease in the value of the ratio


occurred concurrently with an increase in standing crop of benthos which


probably reflects increased productivity of the lake.  This is rather


indirect reasoning, however, and we have no understanding of why the


dominant oligochaetes of the lake should increase relative to amphipods


as a result of eutrophication, especially when we consider the fact


that Stylodrilus is generally considered to be an indicator of oligotrophic


conditions in the Great Lakes.


     A report by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (FWPCA


1968a) summarized studies done in 1962-1964.  They found extensive areas


of high oligochaete ("sludgeworm") abundance off southern and southwestern

                                                                    2
shores of the lake.  They considered worm densities exceeding 1000/m  to


be indicative of pollution (Wright 1955, Surber 1957) and, using this


criterion, identified a 2100 square mile area of polluted conditions in


southern Lake Michigan (Fig. A-13).  Pollution of this large area was


attributed to inputs from the large metropolitan areas on the southern


and southwestern shore (FWPCA 1968a).


     Shallow areas near the southern tip of the lake had lower numbers of


amphipods than comparable areas along eastern and western shores.   The


area of low amphipod density coincided, at least partly, with areas which


held >2000 oligochaetes/m2 (Fig. A-14 ,FWPCA 1968a).
                                   A-38

-------
                                        I • "•' 1,-f ' '' I
                                       Grand  v  ',
                                       Haven (:;   '
                                                            POLLUTED , 1000- 2000/m Z
                                                            VERY POLLUTED, OW 2000/tn Z
                                                      FIGURE I
                                                         GREAT LAKES - ILLINOIS     j
                                                           RIVER  BASINS PROJECT
                                                       SLUDGEWORM POPULATION
                                                          NUMBER PER SQUARE
                                                                 METER
                                                        U.S  DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                      FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AOMIN
                                                      Great Lake* Region       Chicago .llttrote
Figure A-13.  Abundance of  oligochaete worms in  the benthos of  southern

Lake  Michigan, 1962  (From  FWPCA 1968a).
                                       South.: :..'•.•:!.••
                                       Havcoj- -:. •!=' p.V
                                                            OVER  1500/m2
                                                      FIGURE 2
                                                          GREAT LAKES - ILLINOIS
                                                           RIVER  BASINS PROJECT
                                                         SCUD POPULATIONS
                                                       NUMBERING  GREATER THAN
                                                         1500 PER SQUARE METER
                                                         U S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                       FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMIN
                                                       Grant Lakes Region       Chicago .Illinois
 Figure A-14. Abundance  of amphipods  in the benthos  of southern Lake

 Michigan, 1962  (From FWPCA 1968a).
                                      A-39

-------
     Mozley and Alley (1973) present a. more detailed picture of the




differences in numbers of these organisms in the central and southern




basins of the lake (Table A-1).  Average abundance of amphipods was




greater in the central basin at all depths but the difference was greatest




at depths of 40 m or less.  Oligochaetes were more abundant in the




southern basin at depths of 40 m or less.  At greater depths (40 - 140 m)




there was no striking difference between the two regions of the lake




(Table A-l) .




     Areas where Mozley and Alley (1973) found average abundances of




1000 or more oligochaetes per square meter were approximately the same




as those found by the FWPCA (Fig. A-13).  They found, however, much larger




areas of high amphipod abundance and attribute the difference to the fact




that different samplers were used.  The FWPCA used the Petersen grab




while Mozley and Alley used a Ponar.  The Petersen, as built and sold




in the U.S., has solid surfaces in the tops of the jaws and thus a




hydraulic disturbance forms ahead of the grab as it is lowered.  Such a




hydraulic disturbance ("shock wave") can serve as a directional signal




allowing very motile animals to escape and can even blow away fine




surficial sediments with their resident animals (Wrigley 1967).  Since




amphipods live near the sediment water interface ("epifauna") and are




capable of swimming, they would understandably be more seriously affected




by a hydraulic disturbance than the slowly burrowing oligochaetes which




are more typically found deeper in the sediments ("infauna").   The




Ponar, having screened tops in the jaws, creates less of a hydraulic




disturbance and can thus provide a more realistic estimate of amphipod




abundance.
                                  A-40

-------
TABLE A-l.  Comparison of the abundances of Amphipoda and
Oligochaeta between the central and the southern regions of
Lake Michigan by depth zones, 1964-67.  X « mean; S- = standard
error; N = number of observations (single grab samples) (From
Mozley and Alley, 1973).
Taxon
Amphipoda



Oligochaeta



Depth
Zone
0-20m
21-40m
4l-60m
61-140m
0-20m
21-40m
4l-60m
. 61-140m
Central Region

6
8
6
3
1
1
2

X
,380
,477
,876
,353
,389
,460
,509
520
Sx
828
286
294
86
727
83
307
29
N
12
199
116
286
10
196
91
227
Southern Region
-'
2,
4,
4.
3,
2,
3,
2,

^M
X
544
264
858
137
898
411
171
720
Sx
216
301
177
86
346
281
109
49
N
235
160
164
250
229
157
163
248
                           A-41 .

-------
     While Mozley and Alley (1973) did find higher numbers of oligochaetes


in the southern basin than in the central basin  (at depths < 40 m), they

                                                                      2
failed to confirm the picture of generally extreme abundance (> 9000/m )


reported by Robertson and Alley (1965).  Mozley and Alley (1973) analyzed


data from many more stations in the southern basin and we may take theirs


as the more representative of the two sets of data.


     Mozley and Alley also found that, generally, benthic biomass at a


given depth declined south of the latitude of Benton Harbor.   This indi-


cates that increase in oligochaetes did not equal the geographical


decrease in amphipods.  They suggest that this is because of the prepon-


derance of coarse sediments in this area.  Since oligochaetes prefer


fine sediments, the effect of the large areas of sand and gravel would


counteract the tendency for higher pollution levels to elevate oligochaete


abundance.  Mozley and Alley (1973) suggest that interuption of the band


of high oligochaete abundance shown in the Chicago area by the FWPCA


(Fig. A-13) was due to the frequent occurrence of coarse sediments in


that area, rather than to lower levels of pollution.   They conclude that,


because of the lack of permanent deposits of fine sediments  and the dif-


ficulty of collecting grab samples from rocky bottoms, oligochaete


abundance cannot serve well as an indicator of pollution in  the Chicago


agea.


     In the discussion so far, we have made the point that the abundance


of the two major elements in the benthic fauna; amphipods and oligochaetes,


and the ratio of their abundances are considered to have some value as


indicators of environmental quality.   There is evidence that  abundance


of both these groups has increased, and the ratio amphipods/oligochaetes


has decreased in recent years; presumably indicating that eutrophication
                               A-42

-------
is proceeding at a perceptable rate.




     We have seen, however, that attempts to estimate the abundance of




these organisms is affected by the selection of sampling gear, and that




physical features of the environment may modify the effect of a given




level of pollution or eutrophication upon abundance of benthos.  Further-




more, whatever indicator value exists in estimates of amphipods, oligo-




chaetes, or their ratio, it will certainly not have the same significance




in nearshore waters, bays or harbors as in the open lake.  This is




because, in bays and harbors, amphipods other than Pontoporeia are likely




to occur and oligochaetes will be represented largely or entirely by




tubificids, some of which are exceedingly tolerant of pollution.  In the




open lake Pontoporeia is the only amphipod and Stylodrilus accounts for




most of the oligochaete fauna.  In short, attempts to assess environmental




quality through numbers of organisms of major groups are limited in




sensitivity and in scope.









The Value of Studies at the Species Level




     Analysis of the benthic fauna at the species level appears to offer




much more sensitivity for detecting and documenting environmental change




than the enumeration of individuals at higher taxoncmic levels.   I am




not referring here to indicator species in the sense that simple presence




or absence has any significance.   Rather it is the relative abundance of




species varying in pollution tolerance that offers greatest promise in




comparing environmental quality between locations or over time in a




particular area.   To do this correctly requires identification of all




organisms to the fullest extent possible.   Judgements may then be made




on the basis of the proportion of each species and what is known of its
                                A-43

-------
environmental requirements.  It is not satisfactory to simply list




numbers of pollution tolerant and intolerant organisms.  Without identi-




fication to the species level, reinterpretation of the data on the basis




of new knowledge of environmental requirements is not possible.  Reports




with results expressed in this manner also leave the impression, probably




generally correct, that the organisms were, in fact, not really identified.




     In practice, few studies have attempted complete identification of




all organisms found.  This is because most studies are done by one or a




few people whose taxonomic competence is limited.  Also, some groups are




less valuable than others for these purposes; because they lack ecological




differentiation in the Great Lakes or because we have, as yet, a very




incomplete knowledge of their environmental requirements.




     As previously mentioned, there is general agreement that Pontoporeia




affinis is a clean water organism.  It is also commonly considered to be




a cold stenotherm (Henson 1966), although it exists in Lake Michigan at




temperatures ranging from 1-19 C (Alley 1968).  While high densities of




Pontoporeia may be considered good evidence of unpolluted conditions, low




densities do not necessarily reflect pollution but may be related to




other environmental factors (Alley 1968) or, as pointed out earlier, can




simply reflect a poor choice of sampling gear.  Other species of amphipods




are very rare in the lake, but may occur in bays or harbors; e.g.




Howmiller and Beeton (1971) reported Hyalella azteca, Gannnarus fasciatus,




and Crangonyx sp. as well as P_. affinis from Green Bay.




     Sphaeriid clams are an important group in the benthos of the lake.




At least  23 species are present  (Henson and Herrington 1965, Robertson




 1967) but  little use has been made of them in environmental surveillance.
                                 A-44

-------
     Chironomidae larvae have long been employed in the classification




of aquatic habitats (cf. Brundin 1949, 1958) but have been little utilized




in this respect in Lake Michigan.  This is probably because they are a




quantitatively unimportant element in the benthos of the lake; comprising




about 1% of the deep water benthos (Powers and Alley 1967) and little




more (4%; Mozley and Garcia 1972) of shallower benthic assemblages.  In




bays and harbors, however, they constitute a larger proportion of the




fauna (26% in Green Bay; Howmiller and Beeton 1971) and may play a useful




role in environmental assessment in these situations (Howmiller and Maass




1973).




     Oligochaete worms appear to offer particular promise for the bio-




assessment of environmental quality in Lake Michigan.  They are found in




bottom samples from all parts of the lake, including bays and harbors,




and, except on very coarse substrates, are relatively abundant.  Further-




more, more than forty species are known from the lake, and these have a




considerable range of environmental preferences.  Recent studies (Hiltunen




1967, Brinkhurst, Hamilton and Herrington 1968, Howmiller and Beeton 1970)




of species distributions with respect to water quality have allowed a




classification of some species according to their indicator value (Table



A-2).







Benthic Studies in the Calumet Area



     Against the background of some general knowledge of the Lake Michigan




bottom fauna, and of the differences in utility of studies at various




taxonomic levels, we can review the few studies done to date in the




Calumet area.
                                A-45

-------
 Table A-2.  Classification of some Lake Michigan oligochaetes according
 to the degree of enrichment or pollution of the environment  (from Mozley
 and Howmiller 1973).
 I.  Largely restricted to unpolluted
     oligotrophic situations
     ("saprophobes").

     Stylodrilus heringianus
     Pelvoseolex variegatus
     P.  superiorensis
     Lirmodnlns pvofundioola
     Tubifex kessl&rn.
     Rhyacodrilus eooeineus
     H.  man tana

III.  Species tolerating extreme
     enrichment or organic pollution
     (saprophiles and  saproxenes,
     see also IV).

     Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri
     L.  udekemLanus
     L.  angustipenis
     Tubifex tubifex
II. Species characteristic of
    areas which are mesotrophic
    or only slightly enriched.

    Peloscolex ferox
    P.  freyi
    Ilyodrilus templetoni
    Potamothrix moldaviensis
    P.  vejdovskyi
    Aulodrilus spp.
IV.  Species restricted to areas
    of gross organic pollution
    (saprobionts).
    Limnodrilus eervix
    L.  claparedeianus
    L.  maiffneensi-s
    PelosGolex multisetosus
                                A-46

-------
     The FWPCA  (1968a) reported that  sludgeworms and  sphaeriid  clams were


 dominant in the benthos along the southern shore of the lake  (Calumet


 Harbor to Burns Ditch).  They felt that the area was  "extensively  degraded


 biologically in degrees ranging from  severe near Indiana and  Calumet


 Harbors to less severe near Burns Ditch."


     According to the FWPCA (1968a) the degradation of the benthic


 community extended out as far as twenty miles and the total area affected

                                                                 2
 by wastes discharged from the Chicago-Calumet area covers 2100 mi  .  This


 latter judgement is based on the high sludgeworm abundance in the  area


 shown in Fig.A^12.  The relatively low population density of amphipods


 in the southern tip of the lake was said to be caused by toxic wastes


 discharged in the Calumet area.  This, of course, is simply speculation.


 As has already been indicated, the sampling gear used by the FWPCA will


 almost certainly underestimate amphipod abundance, and the effectiveness


 of their sampler (Petersen grab) varies greatly with depth and substrate


 type (Beeton, Carr and Hiltunen 1965).  The lower density of amphipods


 is also possibly a reflection of the shallowness of this region of the


 lake and the normal depth distribution of Pontoporeia (Alley 1968, Mozley


 and Alley 1973).  Lastly,  the FWPCA (1968a)  provides no evidence that


 amphipods are being affected by any toxic agent nor that any waste addi-


 tion from the Calumet area is present over such a large area at levels


 toxic to any organism.


     The FWPCA (1967) reported briefly on examination of a few bottom


samples taken in Calumet Harbor,  Indiana Harbor,  and tributary canals in


1965 and 1966.   Results are not quantitative and organisms are identified


only to major groups (Table A-3).   Nevertheless,  they clearly convey the


impression that  the harbors and immediate tributaries are severely
                                 A-47

-------
TABLE A-3.  Benthic invertebrates found at stations in Calumet Harbor,

Indiana Harbor and tributary canals in 1965 and 1966 (From FWPCA 1967).
Area
Grand Calumet River
ii ti it
Indiana Harbor Canal
ii 11 11
Indiana Harbor Canal
it ii n
Indiana Harbor
n n
Little Calumet River
n n n
Calumet Harbor
n 11
FWPCA
Station
Number
1
1
2
2
3
3
5
5
8
8
13
13
Date
1965
1966
1965
1966
1965
1966
1965
1966
1965
1966
1965
1966
Benthic Invertebrates
None
None
None
Sludgeworms
None
None
Sludgeworms
Sludgeworms
2
Sludgeworms , bloodworms ,
mayflies
Snails , bloodworms
3
Fingernail clams
Fingernail clams, sludgewon
1                          23
  tubificid oligochaetes,    chironomid larvae,    sphaeriids
                               A-48

-------
polluted.  They do not, however, offer the possibility of detecting minor

improvement or degradation of the environments as would quantitative data

at the species level.

     Gagler (1973) examined bottom sediments collected from the Little

Calumet River and Burns Ditch.  He found no benthos in 12 of 13 samples

and only sludgeworms in the other.  Chemical analyses indicated highly

polluted sediments in these waterways as one would be lead to believe

from general paucity of benthic organisms.

     Howmiller  examined bottom samples taken in shallow water at Bailly,

Indiana.  Benthic invertebrates were absent, or present in only low abun-

dance, at many stations.  This was attributed to the fact that most

stations were on hard sand bottoms which, in shallow water and under

periodically turbulent conditions, are a physically harsh environment.

At only one station out of eight did a sample from a sand bottom in water

less than 3 m depth contain benthic invertebrates.  Where the bottom

contained some silt, animals were found even though the water was only

1.5 m deep.  Animals occurred at nine of eleven stations with depths

exceeding 4 m.

     Oligochaete worms of the family Tubificidae accounted for 52% of

the invertebrates found.  These included seven recognizable taxa; Aulodrilus

pluriseta, Limnodrilus cervix, a form morphologically intermediate between

L_. cervix and L_. claparedeianus, L^. hoffmeisteri, Peloscolex multisetosus,

Potamothrix moldaviensis, and P_. vejdovskyi, and a large proportion of

unidentifiable sexually immature forms (Table B-4).  The worm fauna is
  Howmiller, R. P.  1970.  A Report on Benthic Invertebrates from the
  Bailly, Indiana Region of Lake Michigan.  Unpubl. Kept, to Industrial
  Biotest Laboratories, Inc.
                              A-49

-------
 thus  composed of a mixture of forms  tolerant of  enrichment  or  pollution


 and some normally restricted to heavily polluted areas  (Table A-3).


      Sphaeriid clams were abundant at two stations and  small numbers of


 chironomid larvae (Chironomus cf. attenuatus, and Cryptochironomus cf.


 digitatus) occurred at most stations.  Leeches (Helobdella  stagnalis)


 and amphipods (Pontoporeia affinis) were present in low numbers at a few


 stations.


      It was concluded that the bottom fauna of this inshore region was


 dominated by forms characteristic of eutrophic regions, but not of highly


 polluted regions, of the Great Lakes.

              2
     Howmiller  also studied the oligochaete fauna of the Calumet and


 Indiana Harbor region.  Specimens examined were from bottom samples taken


 by personnel of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago in


 December 1967 (16 stations) and August 1968 (23 stations).   The collections


 included eleven species of oligochaetes.


     Table A-4 compares the composition of the oligochaete fauna in the


 Calumet-Indiana Harbor region with that in some other shallow areas of


 Lake Michigan.  The comparison suffers from the fact that the studies


 differed in terms of the size of area, depth range,  number  of stations


 and samples, and in the time of the year  in which samples were taken.


Also,  in each case,  the areas studied are not homogeneous in sediment and


water quality and each includes considerable pattern in terms of worm


 species distribution.   Nevertheless,  marked contrast in the composition


of these faunas  is obvious and correlates well  with  what we otherwise


know of environmental  quality in these areas.
2
  Howmiller, R. P.  1969.  The Oligochaeta of the Indiana Harbor-Calumet
  Harbor Region of Lake Michigan.   Unpubl. Rept.  to Metropolitan Sanitary
  District of Greater Chicago.
                                A-50

-------
TABLE A-4.  Composition of the oligochaete fauna and relative abundance
(percent of total oligochaetes) of species in some shallow areas of Lake
Michigan.
3
Species Calumet-Indiana
Dec. '67 Aug. '68
Stylodrilus heringianus *
Dero digitata
Nais elinguis *
Slavina appendiculata
Uncinais uncinata
Aulodrilus americanus * *
A. pigueti
A. pluriseta 4.8 *
Ilyodrilus temple toni
Limnodrilus angustipenis
L. cervix-claparedeianus 1.1 1.4
L. hoffmeisteri2 23.3 12.8
L . prof undicola
L. udekemianus 2.8 *
Peloscolex ferox
P. freyi *
P. multisetosus 13.1 3.0
P . variegatus
Potamothrix moldaviensis *
P. vejdovskyi * *
Tubifex ignotus
T. tubifex
Undetermined immatures;
with hair chaetae 1.1 *
without hair chaetae 52.9 78.8
*
indicates that species was present but at
percent .
**
species was present but quantitative data
Waukegan Benton
Bailly4 Green Bay5 -Zion6 Harbor7
Sept. '70 May '67 1970-71 July '70
35.0 51.0
*
*
*
**
* ** *
*
* *
1.1 **
*
4.3 3.2 ** *
* 21.8 ** 21.8
** *
* **
*
2.6
* 8.1
** *
9.8 * ** 2.1
4.3 **
**
* **
6.1 4.6 ** 1.7
74.2 56.8 ** 18.5
relative abundance of less than one
are not available.
  intergrades or morphological intermediates.

  Includes counts of L_. spiralis, a species recognized by some Great Lakes
  investigators but synonomized with JL. hoffmeisteri by Brinkhurst  (1965).


                                   A-51

-------
     The Calumet-Indiana Harbor  fauna  is dominated by Limnodrilus


hoffmeisteri.  Mature individuals of this species comprised 23.3% of the


December 1967 samples and 12.8%  of the August 1968 samples.  Like some


other tubificids, L_. hoffmeisteri cannot be positively identified in the


immature condition.  Immature L^. hoffmeisteri are thus included among


the undetermined immatures without hair chaetae  (52.9% in Dec., 78.8% in


Aug., Table A-4).  Species in these collections which, as immatures,


appear similar to immature L_. hoffmeisteri are other Limnodrilus species,


Peloscolex freyi and Potamothrix moldaviensis.  Since these are relatively


uncommon as mature specimens in  the Calumet-Indiana Harbor collections,


we can safely assume that almost all the immatures without hairs are L_.


hoffmeisteri.  Thus this species, which is tolerant of extreme pollution


(Table A-2), comprises approximately 75-90% of the worm fauna in the


Calumet-Indiana Harbor region.   Second in relative abundance is Peloscolex


multisetosus, largely or entirely restricted to areas of gross organic


pollution in the Great Lakes (Table A-2).  The composition of the worm


fauna in this region is obviously much like that in Lower Green Bay


(Table A-4), an area which vies with the Calumet area for the distinction


of being the most severely degraded portion of Lake Michigan (Howmiller


1971, Howmiller and Beeton 1970, 1971).
Footnotes to Table A-4 (cont.)

3
  From data of Howmiller (1969); see footnote p. A-49 .
4
  From data of Howmiller (1970); see footnote p. A-50-

5 From data of Howmiller (1971).

  From data of Orenstein, Larson and Lamble (1971).

  From data of Mozley and Garcia (1972).
                                A-52

-------
      In  contrast,  the  most  common species  in  the  samples  from the  Bailly




 region is  Potamothrix  moldaviensis (9.8%;  Table A-4).   Doubtless many  of




 the  numerous  undetermined immatures without hairs also  belong to this




 "mesotrophic" species.  The presence of £. vejdovskyi in  substantial




 numbers  also  indicates that this area is not  grossly polluted.  From the




 relative abundance of  Limnodrilus cervix-claparedianus  we can surmize




 that there is some patchiness within the area studied and that there are




 places where  sediments resemble those found  in grossly  polluted regions.




      The high relative abundance of Stylodrilus heringianus (a saprophobe,




 Table A-2) indicates much cleaner conditions  in the Waukegan-Zion  and




 Benton Harbor study areas.   Nevertheless,  Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri




 accounts for  over 20%  of the fauna at Benton Harbor. This, again  can  be




 attributed to patchiness (commented upon by  Mozley and  Alley, 1973) and




 the  fact that an environmental gradient exists within the area studied.




      Some of  the regional variation in composition of the worm fauna




 within the Calumet-Indiana Harbor area can be seen in Figs.A-15 through




 A-20  which are taken  from the report by Howmiller.




      Figure A-15shows  the relative abundance of worms of  the genus




 Limnodrilus,  including immatures without hair chaetae,  at stations sampled




 in December 1967.   Figure A- 16is a similar plot of data from the survey




 of August 1968.



      In  this  area, the genus includes only species tolerant of, or




 restricted to, polluted conditions.  The distributional pattern (Fig.  A-15,




16) clearly reflects the importance of the  Indiana Harbor  as a source of




 pollution in  this part of the lake.  It is difficult to know whether any
   See footnote on p.  A-50.
                                  A-53

-------
Ul
                               Figure A-15 .  Relative abundance of worms of the genus Limnodrilus




                               (percentage of all oligochaetes)  at stations of December 1967 survey.

-------
Oi
Ui
                                Figure A-16. Relative  abundance  of worms  of the genus Limnodrilus


                                (percentage of  all oligochaetes)  at  stations of August 1968 survey.

-------
 importance  should be  ascribed  to  the difference between the two years,




 viz.  the  apparently larger  area of  very  high  relative abundance in August




 1968.   When comparisons  are made  between years, care should be taken to




 replicate exact  station  locations,  the season of sampling,  and methodology




 (Howmiller  and Beeton 1971).   At  least the  first two criteria are not met




 in  this case, and so  the difference between years may be an artifact or




 may be  caused by normal  seasonal  variation  in the numbers of some taxa.




      In both 1967 (Fig. A-17 and  1968 (  Fig. A-18) the greatest relative




 abundance of Peloscolex  multisetosus was found at some distance from the




 two polluting inflows and on sediments of "low" or  "moderate pollution"




 (cf Fig. A-10) .   This  is  in  agreement with studies elsewhere (Brinkhurst




 1969, Howmiller  and Beeton  1970)  which have showed  that,  while P_.




 multisetosus is  favored  by  pollution, it is not as  extremely tolerant as




 Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri or L_.  cervix-claparedeianus.




     Worms  of the genus  Aulodrilus,  characteristic  of slightly enriched




 areas in  the Great Lakes, are  here  present  at  a low relative abundance




 and are conspicously  absent from  stations near Indiana Harbor (Fig. A~19>



A- 20) .




     Abatement of pollution in this  area would be expected  to be  followed




 by  a decrease in the  relative  importance of Limnodrilus spp.,  expansion




 of  the  areas occupied by P_. multisetosus and Aulodrilus,  increase  in




 relative  importance of these and  some other taxa currently  less numerous




 (Table A-4), and invasion by other  species  not currently  found in  the




 area.   On the other hand, worsening  of conditions would eliminate  P_.




 multisetosus and Aulodrilus completely and  result in a fauna consisting




 solely  of L_. hoffmeisteri and  L_.  cervix-claparedeianus.   Areas near  the




 Indiana Harbor outlet would probably become devoid  of macrobenthos.  It
                                  A-56

-------
f
Ul
•J
                            Figure A-17 .  Relative abundance of Peloscolex multisetosus  (percentage




                            of all oligochaetes) at stations of December 1967.

-------
Oi
00
                                                  ooo
                  Figure A-18. Relative abundance of Peloscolex multisetosus (percentage


                  of all oligochaetes) at stations of August 1968.

-------
                                                               Aa - Aulodrilus americanus




                                                               Apl - A. pluriseta
Figure  A 19. Relative abundance of worms of the genus Aulodrilus




(percentage of all oligochaetes) at stations of December 1967.

-------
I
cr«
o
                           Figure A-20.   Relative abundance of worms of the genus Aulodrilus



                           (percentage of all oligochaetes) at stations of August 1968.

-------
can thus be seen that this study of the composition of the worn fauna


can serve as a valuable baseline from which to measure future changes in


environmental quality in this area.  Analysis of the worm fauna at the


species level becomes particularly necessary when, with increasing levels


of pollution, other invertebrates are eliminated while worms become an


increasingly abundant part of the fauna (cf.  Carr and Hiltunen 1965,


Howmiller and Beeton 1971).





Effects of Benthos on Sediment-Water Exchange


     A number of studies have shown that burrowing benthic invertebrates


can have important effects upon the structure of sediments and upon


exchange of materials between sediments and water.  These effects may be


caused by mechanical overturn of sediments, chemical transformation of


sediment within the gut of the animal, or by irrigation of burrows with


consequent changes in the stratification of redox potential.


     This area has been so little studied that we have no good estimate


of the importance of these processes under various natural conditions.


However, the studies which have been published give an indication that


the subject should not be ignored in programs concerned with pollution


abatement or eutrophication control.  For example, concentrations of


pollutants or plant nutrients may not change in direct response to changes


in inputs if the new conditions alter the rate at which invertebrates


cause release of the substance(s) from the sediments.


     Various authors have attempted to estimate the rate at which tubificid


oligochaetes overturn sediments.  Results have been variable but indicate

                              2
that it may range to 6-12 kg/m /yr (Lundbeck 1926).  Clearly, mixing of


this magnitude could have substantial effects on chemical processes.
                                   A-61

-------
     Tubificids  (Zvetlova 1972) and chironomid larvae  (Rossolimo 1939,


Edwards 1958) have been shown to increase the rate of oxygen consumption


by sediments.


     Howmiller (unpublished) conducted an experiment in which Limnodrilus

                                                             2
hoffmeisteri, at densities equivalent to 10,000 and 50,000 /m , were


placed in Milwaukee Harbor mud and covered with filtered Lake Michigan


water.  Three sets were run; at high and low oxygen concentrations and


under anaerobic conditions.  In all cases the water increased more in


phosphate concentration than it did in comparable controls lacking worms.


     Jernelov (1970) showed that tubificids, and also the clam Anodonta,


cause an increase in the depth from which mercury is released to the


overlying water.   Yealy (1971) studied uptake of methyl-mercury and


effects on release to the water by three common Lake Michigan inverte-


brates; Stylodrilus heringianus, Pontoporeia affinis, and a sphaeriid


clam.  Results suggested that the organisms enhanced the release of


mercury and Yealy believed that Stylodrilus played an especially import-


ant role in this respect.   It had the highest uptake of methyl-mercury of


the three species studied.


     Review of this subject has been cursory but an exhaustive treatment


would bring us to the same conclusion, viz? research has been insufficient


to provide generalizations but the subject seems an important one for


consideration of nutrient and pollutant pathways.   This is especially


true in many parts of the Great Lakes, such as the Calumet area,  where


the sediments contain high concentrations of nutrients and pollutants


(Fig. A-10).
                                  A-62

-------
                  Recommendations for Applied Research




                   on the Benthos of the Calumet Area








Species Distributional Patterns




     An earlier section was devoted to discussion of the use of species




distributional patterns, and the relative abundance of species with




indicator value, in documenting the state of the environment.  Another




section reviewed, existing knowledge of this sort for the Calumet area.




The major short-coming of this study was that it covered only a restricted




area; an area obviously grossly polluted with inputs from Calumet and




Indiana Harbors.




     There seems little point in duplicating this study in the near




future as we b,ave little reason to believe that environmental conditions




in the area have undergone substantial change.  However, a survey is




needed whiph will extend the area investigated? to determine the areal




extend of degradation of the benthic environment in the Calumet area.




The only study which has attempted to provide this information (FWPCA




1968a) is woefully inadequate because it employed a sampling device




known to be very ineffective, because organisms were not identified to




species, and (while station locations are not given in the report) it




appears to have taken few samples in the Calumet area.




     Following is a proposal for a sampling plan which would pro-




vide a far better picture of the benthic communities in the Calumet area.




Samples should be taken in triplicate on a (60°) diagonal grid (Fig.  A-21)




a pattern which gives the most even coverage of the area and allows




calculation of indices of similarity between benthic assemblages over




uniform distance.   The usefulness of an index of similarity between
                                 A-63

-------
assemblages at adjacent stations is in providing a numerical value




representing quantitative and qualitative change in the benthos and thus




change in environmental conditions.  The value used should take into




consideration both the number of species in common and differences in




equitability (evenness of distribution of individuals among species).




A measure of "overlap" based on information theory may be suitable for




the purpose (Horn 1966).




     Needless to say, this will require species identification of all




organisms, and I hasten to recommend that quantitative species lists, as




well as exact locations,  be presented in any report on the survey.




Altogether too often it is impossible to reproduce an earlier study, or




to analyze the data in light of new concepts, because the authors give




only their reduced data and we really have no idea of how much of what




was found where.




     The Ponar grab is recommended as the sampler of choice for the




Calumet area.  It is more effective than the Petersen on hard or soft




substrates (Powers and Robertson 1967), and while less effective than




the Ekman grab on mud  (Howmiller 1972) it is at least better than the




Petersen  (Powers and Robertson 1967).  Since ^he Ponar is used for most




benthic investigations by the Great Lakes Research. Division (Univ.




Michigan) and the Center for Great Lakes Studies (Univ. Wisconsin-




Milwaukee) , the major research groups on the lake, it^s use in the Calumet




area will facilitate comparison of data with a maximum number of other




studies.  Two samplers which may initially have great appeal, because




they will obtain a sample from most any kind of substrate, are the Shipek




and orange-peel.  These should not be used as they have been shown to be




quantitatively ineffective for biological samples  (Sly 1969, Flannagan 1970"
                                 A-64

-------
Figure A-21, The above map was drawn from Lake Survey Chart No.  751.

     f - Proposed sampling stations

     Compass Headings for possible runs between stations
     313 NW* and 133 SE* (along lettered transect line)
     213 SW** and 43 NE** (along numbered line)
     13 ME*, 193 SSW*, 73 ENE* and 253 WSW* (diagonal)

* On these runs distances between adjacent stations are exactly  2.0 mile
** On these runs distances between stations are ca 3.46 mile
                                 A-66

-------
     Benthic samples  should be  screened  immediately using a U.S. Std. No.




30 Mesh  (0.565 mm) as this is the mesh most  commonly  employed in Great




Lakes Studies  (Mozley and Howmiller 1973).   Residue from the screen should




be preserved immediately with buffered 10% formalin (4% formaldehyde).




Low power magnification should  be used in separating  organisms from the




screen residue and the most recent monographs used in their identification.




     It  is perhaps worth pointing out that safe, and efficient fieldwork




requires a seaworthy  vessel fitted with  a sonic depth finder and naviga-




tional radar.  The vessel should have ample  deck space, a (powered)




hydrographic winch, and water under pressure piped to the working deck.




The R/V Mysis  (Great  Lakes Research Division) and R/V Neeskay (Center for




Great Lakes Studies)  are examples of suitable vessels for benthic sampling.




     A tentative sampling plan, shown in Figure A-2}  involves 15 stations




on a two mile diagonal grid.  Under favorable weather conditions, and with




a suitable vessel, sampling could be accomplished in  a day by experienced




personel.




     The proposed plan is, of course, tentative.  Preliminary sampling,




or analysis of water  quality data, may indicate that  some modification




would be desirable.   For example, one might wish to expand the area of




investigation, especially in the direction of the usual path of water




originating in the Calumet-Indiana Harbor area.









Effects of Benthos on Chemical Parameters




     Attempts at modeling expected changes in water quality should not




ignore the possible importance of benthic organisms in facilitating




chemical transport across the sediment-water interface.   In the Calumet




area new effluent standards may result in lower concentrations  of toxic
                                 A-65

-------
substances and higher concentrations of oxygen in and near the harbor




areas.  This cpuld conceivably allow a great increase in benthic popula-




tions since the sediments, in many places, have abundant organic matter




for them to exploit.  Greatly increased populations of burrowing benthic




invertebrates could cause a large difference in the rate at which certain




substances are released from, or bound to, the sediments.  This possibility




must be considered in attempts to predict future water quality.




     This situation demands research to estimate current rates of sediment-




water exchange of important materials (oxygen, phosphorus, nitrogen com-




pounds, metals).  It must also include predictions of effects of antici-




pated water quality changes upon the abundance of benthic invertebrates




and upon their effect on sediment-water interactions.  This is a very




complex problem for which basic science has not yet provided the ground-




work.  However, the current fiscal situation in basic science seems to




suggest that we have to wait a long time for answers to certain questions.




In such a case basic research must become "applied" in areas where real




or potential problems exist.
                                A-67

-------
                            LITERATURE CITED






Alley, W. P.  1968.  Ecology of the burrowing amphipod Pontoporeia affinis




     in Lake Michigan.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Spec. Rept.




     36, 131 p.




Ayers, J.  1967.  The surficial bottom sediments of Lake Michigan.  In:




     J. C. Ayers and D. C.  Chandler (Eds.),  Studies on the environment




     and eutrophication of Lake Michigan.   Univ. Michigan Great Lakes




     Res. Div. Spec. Rept.  30: 247-253.




Ayers, J. and J. Hough.  1964.  Studies of water movements and sediments




     in southern Lake Michigan, Part II: the surficial bottom sediments




     in 1962-1963.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Spec. Publ. 19,




     44 p.




Ayers, J., E. F. Stoermer and P. McWilliam.   1967.  Recently noticed




     changes in the biology-chemistry of Lake Michigan.  In; J. C. Ayers




     and D. C. Chandler, Studies on the environment and eutrophication of




     Lake Michigan.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Spec. Rept. 30:




     95-111.




Baylis, J. R.  1954.  Effect of microorganisms on length of filter runs




     - a new method of studying filter clogging rate.  Pure Water 6: 151-




     158.




	  1957.  Microorganisms that have caused trouble in the




     Chicago water system.  Pure Water 9:  45-49.




	  1960.  Screen clogging in the Chicago water system.  Pure
     Water 12: 170-173.




Beeton, A. M.  1965.  Eutrophication of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes.




     Limnol. Oceanogr. 10: 240-254.
                                  A-68

-------
               1969.  Changes in the environment and biota of the Great
     Lakes.  In; Eutrophication: Causes, consequences, correctives,



     National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.  p. 150-187.



    	  1970.  The relevance of spatial differences in nutrients
     and biota to the eutrophication problem.  Paper presented to Amer.




     Assn. Adv. Science, Annual Meeting, Chicago, December 1970.




Beeton, A. M., J. F. Carr, and J. K. Hiltunen.  1965.  Sampling efficien-




     cies of three kinds of dredges in southern Lake Michigan.  Univ.




     Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Publ. 13: 209 (Abstr.).




Bell, J. B. and B. J. Dutka.  1972.  Bacterial densities by fluorescent




     microscopy.  Proc. 15th Conf. Great Lakes Res., p. 15-20.




Brinkhurst, R. 0.  1969.  Changes in the benthos of Lakes Erie and Ontario.




     Bull. Buffalo Soc. Natur. Sci. 25(1): 45-65.




Brinkhurst, R. 0., A. L. Hamilton, and H. B. Herrington.  1968.  Compon-




     ents of the bottom fauna of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes.  Univ.




     Toronto Great Lakes Inst. Publ. PR33: 50 p.




Brundin, L.  1949.  Chironomiden und andere Bodentiere der suedschwedischen




     Urgebirgseen.  Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm Rept. 30; 914 p.




	  1958.  The bottom faunistic lake-type system.  Verh. int.




     Verein. Limnol. 13: 288-297.




Claflin, L. and A. M. Beeton.  1972.  Seasonal changes in the phytoplank-




     ton of inshore Lake Michigan.  Paper presented to 15th Conf. Great




     Lakes Res., Madison, Wisconsin, April 1972.




Damann, K. E.  1945.  Plankton studies of Lake Michigan.  I.  Seventeen




     years of plankton data collected at Chicago, Illinois.  Amer. Midi.




     Natur. 34: 769-796.
                                A-69

-------
               1960.  Plankton studies of Lake Michigan.  II.  Thirty-
     three years of continuous plankton and coliform bacteria data




     collected from Lake Michigan at Chicago, Illinois.  Trans. Amer.




     Microsc. Soc. 79: 397-404.




     	  1966.  Plankton studies of Lake Michigan.  III.  Seasonal
     periodicity of total plankton.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div.




     Publ. 15: 9-17.




Davis, C. C.  1966.  Plankton studies in the largest great lakes of the




     world with special reference to the St. Lawrence Great Lakes of




     North America.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Publ. 14: 1-36.




Edwards, R. W.  1958.  The effect of larvae of Chironomus riparus Meigen




     on the redox potentials of settled activated sludge.  Ann. Appl.




     Biol. 46: 457-464.




Eggleton, F. E.  1936.  The deep-water bottom fauna of Lake Michigan.




     Papers Mich. Acad. Sci. 21:  599-612.




	  1937.  Productivity of the profundal benthic zone in




     Lake Michigan.  Papers Mich. Acad. Sci. 22:  593-611.




Flannagan, J. F.  1970.  Efficiencies of various  grabs and corers in




     sampling freshwater benthos.  J. Fish. Res.  Bd. Canada 27: 1691-1700.




Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.  1967.  Report on the




     water quality of lower Lake Michigan, Calumet River, Grant Calumet




     River, Little Calumet River and Wolf Lake.  FWPCA,  USDI,  Chicago,




     Illinois.  71 p.




	  1968a.   Water quality




     investigations, Lake Michigan basin; biology.  FWPCA, USDI,  Chicago,




     Illinois.  41 p.
                                 A-70

-------
                                                  1968b.  Water quality
     investigations, Lake Michigan basin; microbiology.  FWPCA, USDI,



     Chicago, Illinois, 138 p.



     	  1968c.  Progress report
     on the water quality of lower Lake Michigan, Calumet River, Grand




     Calumet River, Little Calumet River and Wolf Lake.  108 p.




Gagler, J.  1973.  Little Calumet River - Burns Ditch survey; bottom




     sediment samples; from Illinois - Indiana state line east to Route




     249; November 9-29, 1972.  U.S. Environ. Protect. Agency, Illinois




     Distr. Office, unpubl. ms.




Gannon, J. E.  1973.  The ecology of Lake Michigan zooplankton - a review




     with special emphasis on the Calumet Area,  unpubl. ms., 51 p.




Gannon, J. E. and A. M. Beeton.  1969.  Studies on the effects of dredged




     materials from selected Great Lakes harbors on plankton and benthos.




     Univ. Wisconsin-Milwaukee Center for Great Lakes Studies Spec. Rept.




     No. 8.  82 p.




	1971.  Procedures for determining the




     effects of dredged sediments on biota - benthos viability and sedi-




     ment selectivity tests.  J. Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 43:  392-398.




Hedrick, L. R., R. Meyer and M. Kossoy.  1962.  Survival of Salmonella,




     Shigella and coliforms in Lake Michigan water.  Univ.  Michigan Great




     Lakes Res. Div. Publ. 9: 159-171.




Henson, E. B.  1966.  A review of Great Lakes benthos research.  Great




     Lakes Res. Div. P.ubl. 14:  37-54.
                                A-71

-------
Henson, E. B. and H. B. Harrington.  1965.  Sphaeriidae (Mollusca:




     pelecypoda) of Lakes Huron and Michigan in the vicinity of the




     Straits of Mackinac.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Publ.




     13: 77-95.




Herbst, R. P.  1969.  Ecological factors and the distribution of




     Cladophora glomerata in the Great Lakes.  Amer. Midi. Natur. 82:




     90-98.




Hiltunen, J. K.  1967.  Some oligochaetes from Lake Michigan.  Trans.




     Amer. Microsc. Soc. 86: 433-454.




Holland, R. E.  1968.  Correlation of Melosira species with trophic




     conditions in Lake Michigan.  Limnol. Oceanogr. 13:  555-557.




	  1969.  Seasonal fluctuations of Lake Michigan diatoms.




     Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 423-436.




Holland, R. E.  and A. M. Beeton.  1972.  Significance to eutrophication




     of spatial differences in nutrients and diatoms in Lake Michigan.




     Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 88-96.




Holleyman, J. B.  1968.  A study of relationship of coliform count in




     Calumet-Indiana Harbor area to wind direction and precipitation.




     Proc. llth Conf. Great Lakes Res., p. 544-549.




Horn, H. S.  1966.  Measurement of "overlap" in comparative ecological




     studies.  Amer. Natur. 100: 419-424.




Hough, J.  1935.  The bottom deposits of southern Lake Michigan.  J.  Sed.




     Petrol. 5: 57-80.




Howmiller, R. P.  1971a.  The benthic macrofauna of Green Bay, Lake




     Michigan.  Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Wisconsin, 225 pp.




	  1971b.  A comparison of the effectiveness of Ekman  and




     Ponar grabs.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 100: 560-564.
                                 A-72

-------
                  1972.  The ollgochaete fauna of central Lake Michigan.
     In; R. P. Hovnailler and A. M. Beeton.  Report on a. Cruise of the




     R/V Neeskay in Central Lake Michigan and Green Bay, 8-14 July 1971.




     Univ. Wisconsin-Milwaukee Center for Great Lakes Studies Spec. Rept.




     13: 58-62.




Howmiller, R. P. and A. M. Beeton.  1970.  The oligochaete fauna of




     Green Bay, Lake Michigan.  Proc. 13th Conf. Great Lakes Res. p. 15-




     46.




	  1971.  Biological evaluation of




     environmental quality, Green Bay, Lake Michigan,  J. Wat. Poll.




     Contr. Fed. (Jan. 1971) pp. 123-133.




Howmiller, R. P. and M. H. Maass.  1973.  The midge fauna of Green Gay;




     its composition and change over the period 1952-1969.  Paper presented




     to the Midwest Benthological Society, East Lansing, Michigan, March




     1973.




Inman, D.  1952.  Measures for describing the size distribution of sedi-




     ments.  J. Sed. Petrol. 22: 125-145.




Jernelov, A.  1970.  Release of methyl mercury from sediments with layers




     containing inorganic mercury at different depths.  Limnol. Oceanogr.




     15: 958-960.




Johnson, W. D., F. K. Kawahara, L. E. Scarce, F. D. Fuller and C. Risley,




     Jr.  1968.  Identification of residual oil pollutants in surface




     waters of the southern end of Lake Michigan.  Proc. llth Conf. Great




     Lakes Res., p. 550-564.




Lundbeck, J.  1926.  Die Bodentierwelt norddeutschen Seen.  Arch. f.




     Hydrobiol, Suppl. 7:  1-473.
                                A-73

-------
McLarty, D. A.  1961.  Observations on the nature and control of excessive




     growth of Cladophora sp.  in Lake Ontario and Lake Erie.   Ontario




     Water Res. Comm. Res. Rept. 30 p.




Mozley, S. C. and L. C. Garcia.  1972.  Benthic macrofauna in the coastal




     zone of southeastern Lake Michigan.   Proc. 15th Conf. Great Lakes




     Res., p. 102-116.




Mozley, S. C. and W. P. Alley.  1973.  Distribution of benthic  inverte-




     brates in the south end of Lake Michigan.  Proc.  16th Conf. Great




     Lakes Res., p. 87-96.




Mozley, S. C. and R. P. Howmiller.   1973.   Benthos of  Lake Michigan.




     (ms in prep.)




Neil, J. H. and G. E. Owen.  1964.   Distribution,  environmental require-




     ments and significance of Cladophora  in the Great Lakes.   Univ.




     Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div.  Publ.  11:  113-121.




Noble,  R. E. and 0. Gullans.  1955.   Influence of sodium thiosulfate  on




     the survival of coliform organisms in stored samples of  untreated




     lake water.  J. Bact. 70: 249-250.




Orenstein, B. G., L. V. Larson, and  M. 0.  Lamble.   1971.   Field sampling




     program, Project VII, Industrial Bio-Test No. W8960.   Part B - Benthos




     study, February 1970 - March 1971. Rept. Industrial Bio-Test Lab.,




     Inc., Northbrook, Illinois. 53  + 9 p.




Powers, C. F. and A. Robertson.  1965.  Some quantitative aspects of  the




     macrobenthos of Lake Michigan.   Univ.  Michigan Great Lakes Res.  Div.




     Publ. 13: 153-159.




Powers, C. F. and W. P. Alley.  1967.  Some preliminary observations  on




     the depth distribution of macrobenthos in Lake Michigan.   Univ.




     Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div.  Spec.  Rept.  30:  112-125.
                               A-74

-------
Powers, C. F. and J. C. Ayers.  1967.  Water quality and  eutrophication




     trends in southern Lake Michigan.  Univ.  Michigan Great  Lakes  Res.




     Div. Spec. Kept. 30:  142-178.




Powers, C. F. and A. Robertson.  1967.  Design and evaluation of  an all-




     purpose benthos sampler.  Univ.  Michigan  Great Lakes Res. Div.  Spec.




     Rept. 30: 126-133.




	  1968.  Subdivisions of the benthic




     environment of the upper Great Lakes,  with emphasis  on Lake  Michigan.




     J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 25:  1181-1197.




Rawson, D. S.  1956.  Algal indicators of  trophic  lake types.  Limnol.




     Oceanogr. 1: 18-25.




Robertson, A,  1967.  A note on the Sphaeriidae of Lake Michigan.  Univ.




     Michigan Great Lakes  Res. Div. Spec. Rept.  30:  132-135.




Robertson, A. and W. P. Alley.  1966.  A comparative study of Lake




     Michigan macrobenthos.   Limnol.  Oceanogr.  11:  576-583.




Robohm, R. A. and J. T. Graikowski.  1966.  Variables  affecting enumera-




     tion of bacteria in Lake Michigan waters  and  sediments.  Univ.




     Michigan Great Lakes  Res. Div. Publ. 15:  140-146.




Rossolimo, L.  1939.  The  role of  Chironomus plumosus  larvae in the ex-




     change of substances  between  the deposits  and  the  water in a lake.




     Arb. Limnol. Sta. Kossino 22:  35.




Scarce, L. E.  1965.  The  distribution of bacterial  densities in Lake




     Michigan. Univ.  Michigan Great  Lakes  Res. Div. Publ. 13: 182-196.




Scarce, L. E. and M. L.  Peterson.   1966.  Pathogens  in  streams tributary




     to the Great Lakes.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Publ. 15:




     147-154.
                               A-75

-------
Schelske, C. L. and E. Callender.  1970.  Survey of phytpplankton and




     nutrients in Lake Michigan and Lake Superior.  Proc. 13th Conf.




     Great Lakes Res., p. 93-105.




Schelske, C. L. and E. F. Stoermer.  1971.   Eutrophication,  silica deple-




     tion, and predicted changes in algal quality in Lake Michigan.




     Science 173: 423-424.




	  1972.   Phosphorus,  silica, and




     eutrophication of Lake Michigan.  In;  Nutrients and Eutrophication,




     Spec. Symp. Amer. Soc. Limnol. Oceanogr., p. 157-171.




Shimp, N. F., H. V. Leland and W. A. White.  1970.  Distribution of major,




     minor, and trace constituents in unconsolidated sediments from




     southern Lake Michigan.  Illinois State Geol. Surv., Environ. Geol.




     Notes, No. 32, 19 p.




Shimp, N. F., J. A. Schleicher, R. R. Ruch, D. B. Heck and H. V. Leland.




     1971.  Trace element and organic carbon accumulation in the most




     recent sediments of southern Lake Michigan.  Illinois State Geol.




     Surv., Environ. Geol. Notes, No. 41, 25 p.




Sly, P. G.  1969.  Bottom sediment sampling.  Proc. 12th Conf. Great




     Lakes Res., p. 855-870.




Somers, L. H. aid P. D. Josephson.  1968.  Bottom sediments of south-




     western Lake Michigan.  Proc. llth Conf. Great Lakes Res., p. 245-252,




Stoermer, E. F.  1968.  Nearshore phytoplankton populations in the Grand




     Haven, Michigan vicinity during thermal bar conditions.  Proc. llth




     Conf. Great Lakes Res., p. 137-150.




Stoermer, E. F. aoi J. J. Yang.  1969.  Plankton diatom assemblages in




     Lake Michigan.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes Res. Div. Spec. Kept. 47,




     268 p.
                                A-76

-------
Surber, E. W.  1957.  Biological criteria for the determination of lake




     pollution.  In: C. M. Tarzwell (Ed.), Biological problems in water




     pollution.  First Seminar, U.S. Public Health Serv. Publ. W57-36,




     pp. 164-174.




Vaughn, J. C.  1961.  Coagulation difficulties at the South District




     Filtration Plant.  Pure Water 13: 45-49.




Verber, J. L.  1966.  A study of Lake Michigan:   chemical,  biological,




     and physical.  Verh. Internat. Ver.  Limnol.  16:  29-46.




Wright, S.  1955.  Limnological survey of western Lake Erie.   U.S.  Fish




     Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Kept. - Fish.  No.  139,  341 p.




Yealy, J.  1971.   Uptake of methyImercurie chloride by Stylodrilus




     heringianus, Sphaerium nitidum, and  Pontoporeia  affinls  from several




     depths in the sediments.  Unpubl. ms. 14 p.




Zvetlova, L.  I.  1972.  Oligochaeta in the oxygen balance of  reservoirs.




     Proc. Symp.  Aquatic Oligochaeta Tartu (1967), p.  118-125 (Russian,




     English summary).
                                A-77

-------
                    APPENDIX B
    THE ECOLOGY OF LAKE MICHIGAN ZOOPLANKTON -
A Review with Special Emphasis on the Calumet Area
                        by
                  John E. Gannon

    University of Michigan Biological Station
             Pellston, Michigan  49769
                        B-l

-------
                       TABLE OP COFT^TTS

                                                           Page
  I.   Introduction	B-3
 II.   A Brief Synopsis of Zooplankton Invest1" e.s +• innr.  ' n
      the Lake Michigan Basin	B-5
      Taxonomy	B-5
      Plankton Bionass	        B-7
      Seasonal and Vertical D1 str-:but i^n	B-9
      Horizontal Distribution   	  B-14
      Zooplankton as Food for Fish	B-18
      Zooplankton in Green Bay	B-20
III.   Zooplankton Stiidies in the Calumet Ares   ....  B-23
 IV.   Identification of Data Gaps an^ Recommendstions  for
      Zooplankton Research in the C lumet Area  ....  B-47
  V.   References Cited    	  B-51
                           B-2

-------
I.  INTRODUCTION

       The zooplankton community of Lake Michigan consists
primarily of a diverse assemblage of Rotifera and micro-
crustaceans (Cladocera and Copepoda).  These organisms are
quantitatively abundant and significant in food chain
dynamics and energy flow characteristics of the Lake
Michigan ecosystem.  They spend most of their life history
in the water column.
       A few other organisms are predominately bottom-
dwellers but at times can be collected in the plankton.
Some non-photosynthetic Protozoa (e.g., Difflugia)
are normally benthic in habit but occasionally are found
in large numbers in the plankton.  The opposum shrimp,
Mysis relicta, and the deepwater amphipod, Fontoporeia
affinis, typically are in \alce bottom sediments during
the day and migrate into the water column at night.  Many
aquatic insects spend their larval stages in the benthos and
become planktonic only for a brief portion of their life
cycle when they move towards the lake surface in preparation
for emergence into the terrestrial environment as adults.
Many larval fishes spend a brief time in the plankton before
assuming predominately bottom-dwelling habits.  In addition,
a variety of small invertebrates (Qstracoda, Hydracarina,
Nematoda, Annelida, and some Cladocera and Copepoda) are
characteristically foun^ on bottom or among rooted plants
and at times are temporarily swept into the plankton in
turbulent near-shore waters.

                         B-3

-------
       Since the euplanktonic Rotifera, Oladocera, and



Copepoda comprise most of the total biomgss of lake



Michigan zooplankton, this review will be concerned only



with these organisms.  The b'ology and ecology of rotifers



and micro-crustaceans in Lake Michigan are poorly under-



stood even though over 60 scientific papers have appeared on



the subject since the late 19th century (Gannon 19^9).



Most papers are descriptive, concentrating heavily upon



taxonomy and distribution in space and time.  Pew papers



have been concerned specifically with the Calumet area of



southern Lake Michigan, and fewer still hqve dealt with



zooplankters in relation to water quality problems in that



region.



       The earliest studies on Lake Michigan zooplankton



were strictly taxonotnic.  They were prorpted by curiosity



about the kinds of organisms found in city wter supplies.



Later, concern about water pollution from municipal sewage



and industrial wastes initiated further studies.  However,,



zooplankton received little attention since most of the



emphasis was placed upon chemical parameters, coliform



bacteria, and phytoplankton.  Renewed interest in Lake



Michigan zooplankton has occurred during the past decade



due to concern about rapidly fluctuating fish stocks and the



recent predominance and abundance of planktivorous fish, such as



alewife, Al_osa pj3eudoharengus_. and smelt, 0smerua mordax. Additional
                         B-4

-------
impetus for zooplankton research has been prompted bj concern
about thermal and radioactive pollution effects on Lake
Michigan biota by waste water discharge from nuclear electric
power generating stations.
        Thia report is a review of pertinent literature on
the ecology of zooplankton with particular emphasis on the
Calumet area of southern Lake Michigan (Figure  B-l) .   The
discussion must not be limited precisely to the Calumet
area alone.  Zooplankters by no means are confined to
artificial boundaries created by man.  The limnology of
Lake Michigan is characterized by complex and massive
hydrodynamics that undoubtedly sweep zooplankters in and
out of the Calumet region.  Zooplankton research which has
been conducted elsewhere in the Lake Michigan basin but
containing data pertinent to the Calumet area will be
discussed.
II.  A BRIEF SYJSOPSIS OP ZOOPLANKTOH IHVESTIQATIONS IS THE
        LAKE MICHIGAN BASIN
        This section includes a brief discussion of papers
dealing with zooplankton ecology throughout Lake Michigan.
The intent is to identify data sources of information on
various aspects of zooplankton ecology pertinent to future
work on zooplankton in the Calumet area.
U&XONOMT

        Early investigations on Lake Michigan zooplankton
were strictly taxonomic.  Birge (1882) briefly listed 9
                        B-5

-------
            I
           88'
87
86*
-46*
                  ESCANABA
         MENOMINEE1'
 45*
-44»
                                                                    44'-
-42*
       PORT
   WASHINGTON-
  MILWAUKEE
                                             LAKE MICHIGAN
                                             BATHYMETRY IN METERS
                  Compiled and'drown by: R. J. Ristlc
                        Dote; November 1970
                                                                    43-



                                                 ZO   40 |  60   80 KILOMETERS


                                                  20     40    60 MILES
    WAUKEGAN
                  Contour interval 20 meters,
                  except in northern  end of
                  lake where  contour interval
                  is 50 meters.
                                     8ENTON HARBOR
                                         42°-
                             tf>MlCHIGAN  CITY

                          87*               86»
                                 85*
 Figure B-lo  Morpheme trie map  of Lake Michigan.  The  focus of  this
      report is on the Calumet  area of extreme southwestern Lake
      Michigan extending from the 68tH Street Chicago  water intake c
      to Burns Harbor  near Gary,  Indiana.

                              B-6

-------
species of Cladocera found in the City of Chicago water
supply.  Forbes (1882) provided descriptions of some
zooplankton Crustacea collected near Chicago, Illinois;
off Racine, Wisconsin; and in Grand Traverse Bay.  Marsh
(1895), Jennings (1896), and Kofoid (1896) gave taxonomic
accounts of Copepoda, Rotifera, and Protozoa, respectively,
collected in a biological survey of the Grand Traverse Bay
region (Ward I895;l896).  Schact (1897; 1898) and Marsh
(1909; 1929) used specimens from Lake Michigan in taxonomic
treatments of North American Copepoda.  Ahlstrom (1936),
in the first offshore investigation of plankton in Lake
Michigan, examined phytopiankton, Protozoa, and Rotifera
from net tows in the  southern portion of Lake Michigan
during 1930 and 1931.  None of his stations included the
Calumet area, but this work represents the most detailed
account available on  rotifer species composition in the
offshore waters of Lake Michlg an.  Many species encountered
in Ahlstrom1s study undoubtedly occur at times in the
Calumet region.  The  most recent taxonomic study using
specimens from Lake Michigan was by Deevey and Deevey (1971)
who revised a portion of the cladoceran family, Bosminidae.

PLANKTON BIOMASS

        Several studies have examined  total plankton biomass,
including zooplankton, at municipal water intakes at
Milwaukee, Wisconsin  (Damann 1966) and at Chicago, Illinois
(Baylis and Gerstein  1929; Lackey 19144; Daraann 19U5, I960;
                         B-7

-------
Garnet and Rademacher I960; Gerstein 1965; Vaughn 1969;
Vaughn and Reed 1972).  Total counts of plankton have been
routinely monitored where phytoplankton, mainly diatoms,
have caused clogging of filters and taste and odor problems
in city water supplies.  Since phytoplankton and zooplankton
numbers were normally combined, and since zooplankters are
usually less than 0.1 percent of net phytoplankton counts
(Damann 19U^)> these data contain little information
concerning zooplankton.  Identifications of zooplankton, if
attempted at all, were usually confined to the most
abundant genera.  Total plankton count data have been useful
only in applied problems related to drinking water supplies
and in detecting a significant increase in phytoplankton
abundance in southern Lake Michigan during the past £0
years (see Howmiller 1973, p. A-l).
        Further data from water intake stations in Lake
Michigan were obtained by Williams (1962; 1966) as part
of the National Water Quality Network program conducted by
the U.S. Public Health Service in 1957 through 1962.  Two
Lake Mich^pn stations (Gary, Indiana and Milwaukee, Wisconsin)
were among 128 stations established in the Great Lakes and
on major rivers across the United States.  Bnphasis in this
investigation was on phytoplankton but limited quantitative
data were obtained on rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods.
In comparison with stations elsewhere, Lake Michigan
exhibited a particularly rich rotifer fauna.
                        B-8

-------
        Zooplankton biomass measurements, as dry weight  and
particulate organic matter, were made by Robertson  and
Powers  (1965;1967) and Powers et al. (196?) in Lake Michigan
during  196U-66 and by Ayers and Huang (196?) during 196U
in Milwaukee Harbor.  These data may be useful for  compara-
tive purposes when similar tests are run in future  years,
but presently contribute little to our knowledge of Lake
Michigan zooplankton ecology.

SEASONAL AND VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION

        Eddy (1927) obtained the first data on seasonal
distribution of zooplankton in Lake Mich5.gan.  He examined
plankton from near-shore surface tows taken in the  extreme
southern end of the lake during 1887-88 and 1926-27.  Most
of these data were treated qualitatively although some
semi-quantitative results were presented for a few  dates
in 1926-27.  Wells (I960) conducted the first truly
quantitative study at offshore stations 13 km (8 mi) west
of Grand Haven, Michigan in 195^ and 14..8 km (3 mi) west of
Frankfort, Michigan in 1955 using a Clarke-Burapus sampler.
Detailed data on seasonal and vertical distribution of
zooplankton Crustacea were obtained on 10 dates from June
through November.   This work still stands as the most
thorough investigation of zooplankton ecology ever conducted
in the Lake Michigan basin.
        Wells (1970) resampled his 195U station off Grand
Haven, Michigan in 1966 and  1968 at the same time of the
                           B-9

-------
year using identical methods.  He noted dramatic changes in
zooplankton size and species composition between 195U
(pre-alewife abundance) and 1966 (maximum alewife abundance).
All species larger than 1.0 mm, except Diaptomus oregonenals,
sharply declined to one-fourth or less of their former
abundance while all smaller species, except Diaptomus
minutus, increased 1.2 to 72 times over their 1954 standing
crop (Table 1).  Several species (Eubosmina coregoni,
Daphnia longiremis, Ceriodaphnia qiuadrangula, and Eurytemora
affinis) appeared in the community in 1966 that were not
reported in 195U-  Size-selective predation by alewife was
strongly suspected as the causative factor.  In 1968, following
the massive alewife die-off of 1967, there was some evidence
that the zooplankton community was shifting back to compo-
sition similar to pre-alewife abundance.  Many of the larger
species increased in abundance from 1966 to 1968, although
Daphnia galeata-mendotae and Mesocyclops edax still
remained exceedingly rare (Table B-l).
        Gannon (1972a)        contributed information on
abundance and distribution of zooplankton Crustacea in
Lake Michigan off Milwaukee, Wisconsin in 1968-70.  Seasonal
distribution was studied at two stations, an inshore station
in Milwaukee Harbor and an offshore station 18 km (10 mi)
east of Milwaukee.  This investigation presented the only
detailed dste available on Lake Michigan zooplankton Crustacea
during the winter months.  A parallel study was conducted
by Stemberger (1973) on the Rotifera of the Milwaukee Harbor
                         B-10

-------
Table B-1..'  Abundance of zooplankton Crustacea in 1966 and 1968
            relative to that in 1954.  Calculated from Wells' (1970)
            data for mid-July and early August in Lake Michigan
            off Grand Haven, Michigan.
Mean
Length
Species (mm)
Cladocera
Leptodora kindtii
Daphnia galeata-mendotae
Daphnia retrocurva
Diaphanosoma leuchteribergianum
Polyphemus pediculus
Bosmina longirostrjs
Copepoda
Senecella calanoides
Limnocalanus macrurus
Epischura lacustris
Diaptomus sicilis
Mesocyclops edax
Diaptomus oregonensis
Cyclops bicuspidatus thorn as i
Diaptomus ashlandi
Diaptomus minutus

5t
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
2.9
2.5
1.7
1.3
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.8
Abundances relative to
1.00 in 1954
1966 1968

0.17
<0.01
0.03
0
72.08
4.63
0.25
0.23
0.09
0.25
0
1.22
2.85
1.16
0.72

0.65
<0.01
1.18
0
144.09
1.94
0.75
2.11
0.56
0.58
<0.01
0.90
2.17
0.21
4.93
                           B-ll

-------
region during 197;-.  This study presents the only compre-



hensive analysis available on rotifer species composition



and abundance Tor the inshore waters of Lake Michigan.



Since the investigations of Gannon (1972s)  and Gtemberger



(1973) were partially conducted in the enriched waters or



Milwaukee H&rbor and represent the most complete studies to



date on zooplankton spades composition and distribution in



Lake Michigan, they should be of interest to future workers



on zooplankton in the Calumet area of Lake Michigan.



       Based upon the studies of Gannon (1972s) and Stemberger



(1973), Gannon (1972b) discussed the relative effects of



eutrophication and fish predation on recent changes in zooplsnkton



species composition in Lake Michigan.  Both eutrophlcation



and size-selective predation can cause a decrease in the size



composition of zooplankton and such changes o^ten entail



shifts in species composition.  Since eutrophication and



fish predation often result in similar changes in zooplankton



size and species composition, it is often difficult to



distinguish the effects of these two factors on the zooplankton



community.  However, it was noted that oligotrophic offshore



waters of Lake Michigan contained high numbers of calanoid



copepods relative to cladocerans and rotifers and the



opposite was true for the more eutrophic inshore waters.



It was suggested that the relative proportions of



calanoid copepods to cladocerans and rotifers may be



useful in indicating the state of eutrophication of Great



Lakes waters (Gannon 1972b).
                          B-12

-------
       A few additional studies have presented limited
data on seasonal distribution and abundance of Lake Michigan
zooplankton.  Seasonal distribution of diaptomid copepods
in western Lake Michigan during spring through fall, 19614.
was reported by Robertson (1966).  Manny and Hall (1969),
in an attempt to measure community metabolism by the diurnal
oxygen curve method, obtained limited data on zooplankton
abundance in the surface waters near Grand Haven, Michigan
in July, 1968.
       Schelske and Roth (1973) obtained limited zoo-
plankton data from 6 stations in northern Lake Michigan
on 7 July 1970-  Information on zooplankton (mostly Crustacea)
biomass by volume determinations and generic composition
was procured.  These data offer little information on
Lake Michigan zooplankton alone.  However, they are useful
in comparing zooplankton Crustacea community structure and
abxindance in Lake Michigan with other Great Lakes since
identical methods were employed on Lakes Superior, Huron,
and Erie.
       In addition to the data of Wells (I960) on vertical
migration of zooplankton Crustacea in Lake Michigan,
McNaught (1966) and McNaught and Hasler (1966) obtained
more detailed information from a station off Saugatuck,
Michigan during summer, 196i| and another off Ludington,
                          B-13

-------
Michigan in spring, 1965.  Correlations were made between
vertical migration patterns of several species, visual
sensitivity of those species to spectral composition of
light, and changes in light intensity.  Lane and McNaught
(1970) reexamined data from August, 19614, using mathematical
analyses of niche specificity.  Habitat selection through
vertical migration was considered the most significant
mechanism for separating niches among "omnivorous" and
"herbivorous" zooplankters.

HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION

        Several investigations have examined horizontal
distribution of zooplankton in the offshore waters of
Lake Michigan.  The Hardy continuous plankton recorder
has been utilized in two investigations in tte offshore
waters of the lake.  Robertson (1968) presented limited
data for Lake Michigan in 1965 and 1966 while exploring
possibilities of adapting the Hardy recorder for use in
the Great Lakes.  Swain, Olson, and Odlaug (1968;1970)
towed a continuous plankton recorder at a depth of 10 m along
the longitudinal axis of the lake during July and August,
1966 and July and October, 1967.  Since only one depth was
sampled at all hours of  the day and night, these data are
difficult to interpret due to unmeasured effects of vertical
migration on the samples  obtained.  In general, Daphnia and
Bosmina were more abundant at the southern end of the lake
than elsewhere.  Cyclops was most abundant nearer the shorelines.
                         B-14

-------
        Interest in the dispersal of pollutants in the near-
shore waters of Lake Michigan have spurred a number of
investigators to pursue studies on horizontal distribution
of zooplankton near harbors and other point sources of
potential pollutants.  Several investigations have been
conducted in the vicinity of Milwaukee Harbor and a
considerable number of studies are currently underway in
the vicinity of nuclear electric power generating stations
mostly in the southern portion of the lake.
        In the Milwaukee Harbor region, Torke (1971) studied
the distribution and abundance of Cladocera near the Milwaukee
Harbor in August and September, 1969.  In general, no
significant differences in inshore-offshore species compo-
sition or abundance were detected.  Only the higher abundance
of Daphnia retrocurva offshore (8-16 km) than inshore (O.lj.-
3.2 km) was statistically significant.  Gannon (1972a)
investigated horizontal distribution of zooplankton Crustacea
by obtaining a series of samples from the cooling water
intake of a Chesapeake and Ohio railroad ferry as it steamed
across the lake along a northeast course from Milwaukee,
Wisconsin to Ludington, Michigan.  The sampling program
was conducted overnight on six dates from March, 1969 through
January, 1970.  Horizontal distribution of zooplankton was
notably uniform during spring, fall, and winter.  However,
contrary to the results of Torke (1971), obvious inshore
and offshore differences in abundance were observed during
summer.  Certain species (such as Bosmina longiroatris and
                         B-15

-------
Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi) were dramatically more abundant



in the near-shore waters (0-l£ km) off Milwaukee in comparison



with stations farther offshore.  Higher numbers off Milwaukee



reflect a response by the zooplankters to nutrient enrich-



ment of the near-shore waters by the discharge of municipal



sewage, industrial wastes, and storm water run-off from the



Milwaukee River watershed.  Inshore and offshore differences



were evident but less distinct off the small town of



Ludington, Michigan.



        Even more dramatic results of inshore and offshore



differences were noted in Stemberger's (1973) study of



rotifers in the Milwaukee Harbor region.   Certain species,



most likely of lotic origin, were found only in the harbor



region.  Lentic forms characteristic of the Lake Michigan



biota decreased dramatically in abundance at stations



further offshore.  Rotifers near the harbor appear to be



responding to higher nutrient conditions  with faster growth



rates enabling a large biomass to be accrued.
        Our knowledge of zooplankton ecology in the coastal



zone of Lake Michigan has been augmented considerably by



investigations on the impact of heated water discharges



from electric generating stations on Latce Michigan biota.



Much of this research is currently underway and many reports



are unavailable for review at this date.  Investigations on
                          B-16

-------
zooplankton have formed an integral part of many of these
studies.  Most notable are the investigations of Roth and
Stewart (in press; also in Ayers and Seibel 1973) in the
vicinity of the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant near
St. Joseph, Michigan.  Abundance and distribution of
zooplankton Crustacea were investigated at three stations
ranging from inshore (1.2 km from shore) to offshore (11.2 km
from shore) from April through November, 1972.  A distinct
inshore fauna consisting predominately of Cladocera was
noted.  Persistence of a distinct inshore fanna was attributed
to one or a combination of the following factors:  thermal
stratification, high near-shore primary productivity, or
fish predation.  Industrial Bio-test, Inc. (1972) has been
investigating thermal effects at two power plants in south-
western Lake Michigan since spring, 1971.  Zooplankton
Crustacea species composition and abundance have been
investigated quantitatively in the coastal waters at a
functional fossil fuel plant near Waukegan, Illinois and
a nuclear plant currently under construction near Zion,
Illinois.   Investigations on entrainment and condenser
passage by zooplankton have also been conducted at the
Waukegan plant.  Mortality was low (average of 6 percent)
with mechanical abrasion indicated as a more important
cause of death than temperature stress.  A more limited
study was  also conducted by Industrial Bio-test Laboratories,
Inc.  (1971)  at the Bailey generating station near Gary,
Indiana prior to conversion of the plant from fossil to
nuclear fuel.   Distribution of zooplankton Crustacea was
                           B-17

-------
determined inside and outside of the thermal plume area

during October, 1970.  Cladocera (mainly Daphnia and Bosmina)

were significantly more abundant in the plume while copepods

(mostly Diaptomus) were more prevalent outside the plume,.



ZOOPLANKTON AS POOD FOR PISH


        Interest in the adequacy of the plankton food supply

for commercially valuable fish in Lake Michigan prompted

several studies on zooplankton.  Forbes (1882) wrote:

        "One cannot go far in the study of organic
        life which prevails in a stream or lake,
        without being made aware of the important
        part played therein by the neglected but
        interesting group of the smaller crustaceans.
        They occupy a central position not only in
        the classification of aquatic animals, but
        also in the complicated network of physiological
        relations by which the living forms of a body
        of water are held together as an organized
        society.  Feeding, themselves, upon the lowest
        and smallest of plants and animals, they furnish
        food in turn to a great variety of the higher
        animals, and even to some plants.
            "The fisherman who toils at his nets, the
        sportsman in pursuit of health and recreation,
        rarely reflect, even if they know, that their
        amusements and their labors depend strictly
        upon these humble creatures, of whose very
        existence, indeed, many of them are unaware;
        and yet there is ample evidence that, with few
        and unimportant exceptions, all young fishes,
        of our fresh waters at least, live for a time
        almost wholly upon entomostraca."

Forbes (1883; 1888) ran a series of laboratory experiments

on  the first food of larval whitefish, Coregonus clupeaformis,

using plankton from southern Lake Michigan.  Cyclops and

Diaptomus were the most important food snrces following

absorbance of the yolk sac.  Wells and Beeton (1963)
                        B-18

-------
examined stomach contents of l,lj.69 bloaters, Coregonus hoyi,
collected from various locations in Lake Michigan during
1951t through 1961.  Bloaters under 18 cm (7 in) long fed
heavily upon zooplankton Crustacea.  The most frequent
species in stomachs were Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi,
Diaptomus spp., and Daphnia galeata-mendotae.  Pish larger
than 18 cm fed predominately on Pontoporeia and Mysis.
        The population explosion of alewife, Alosa
pseudoharengus, during the last decade prompted several
studies on the food habits of this species.  Norden (1968)
examined the food of larval alewife (0.5-6.7 cm) in
Milwaukee Harbor during August, 1966 and August through
October, 1967.  Positive selection for both cladocerans
and copepods was generally observed.  Cyclops spp. and
Bosmina spp. were most prevalent in larval alewife stomachs.
Morsell and Norden (1968) examined food habits of juvenile
and adult alewife in Lake Michigan from May, 1966 through
July, 1967.  Cladocera and Copepoda comprised most of the
alewife diet.  Limnocalanus macrurus was most common in
profundal zone collections while Cyclops bicuspidatus and
Diaptomus spp. were most prevalent in littoral collections.
Bosmina long_irostris and Diaptomus spp. were prominent in
stomachs of alewife collected in summer,
        A series of studies most pertinent to the Calumet
area have been conducted on interspecies relationships
of fish in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan.  The
investigations were conducted by graduate students from
                            B-19

-------
 Ball  State  University  under  the  leadership  of  T.  S.
 McComish.   Three  of  the  investigations have  involved
 zooplankton.  Johnson  (1972) conducted quantitative studies
 on  zooplankton species composition and abundance  during
 June  through October 1970.   Two  parallel studies  examined
 food  habits of the alewife in the same region  (Rhodes
 1971; Webb  1973).  These
investigations represent the most thorough studies on
zooplankton ecology in the Calumet area of Lake Michigan
and will be discussed in detail in the next section.

ZOOPLANKTON IN GREEN BAY

        All previously mentioned  studies  have been
conducted in the main portion of  the  Lake Michigan Basin.
Although Green Bay is geographically  distant and morpho-
logically distinct from the Calumet area  of Lake Michigan,
the two regions are similar in  that they  both receive
high  volume waste water discharges from municipal and
industrial sources.  Consequently, it may be of interest
to briefly mention the few studies that have been
conducted in the Green Bay region.
        Balch, et al. (195&)  collected zooplankton samples
in lower Green Bay during February,  1955  and in the Pox
River during April and July,  1955 using a plankton trap
of unknown dimensions.   Data  were expressed only as
numbers of Cladocera, Copepoda, and  nauplii per unit  volume.
                            B-20

-------
 These data indicate that the Pox River  supports high
 numbers (8,000-lj.QQ»000 per m*) of zooplankton Crustacea
 during summer.  It was estimated from dry weight
 measurements that 1.21). x l(r kg (136.U  tons) of plankton
 was flowing from Lake Winnebago and  entering the  lower
 Pox River.  Judging by plankton densities throughout
 the river, a considerable biomass of plankton is  suspected
 to enter Green Bay by way of the river.
         The open waters throughout Green Bay were sampled
 with vertical tow nets in 1969-70 during all seasons by
 Gannon (1972a).  The zooplankton Crustacea of southern
 Green Bay differs substantially from that of the  northern
 portion of the Bay and Lake Michigan proper.  Due to
 the shallow nature of southern Green Bay, the incidence  of
 littoral and benthic micro-crustaceans  in the plankton was
 higher in this region than elsewhere in the Lake  Michigan
 basin.  The southern portion of the  Bay is strongly
 influenced by the inflow of the Pox  River. Water  from  the
 Pox River retains its identity from  3f?  to $0 km north  of
 the river mouth along the eastern shore of the Bay.  This
 zone of Pox River water in southrn Green Bay exhibits
 faunal characteristics most dissimilar  to Lake Michigan.
 Standing crop of zooplankton Crustacea was generally
 higher in the zone of Pox River water than elsewhere .
      The large biomass  of  zooplanktnn in snthern Green
Bay is due to  constant  inputs  from  the Pox River and  is
probably enhanced  by  high recruitment  and productivity
of zooplankton  in  the nutrient laden waters of the  Pox
River water mass.  Many  species  common in the plankton of
                            B-21

-------
Lake Winnebago were transported through the Pox River and
established populations in southern Green Bay.  Many of
these species are rare or entirely absent elsewhere in the
Lake Michigan basin.
        A brief study on zooplankton distribution in
southern Green Bay was conducted by Torke (1972).  He
sampled 7 stations with a vertical two net on 12 July 1971.
He noted that Cyclops vernalis and Diaptomus siciloides
were important constituents of the micro-crustacean fauna.
The former species is rare in Lake Michigan while the
latter has not been reported elsewhere in Lake Michigan.
        A few investigations have examined food habits of
planktivorous fishes in Green Bay.  The previously
mentioned study of Norden and Morsell (1968) on alewife
food habits included collections in southern Green Bay.
Further studies on alewife were conducted by Gannon (1972a)
who examined stomach contents of alewife collected off
Pensaukee, Wisconsin on 10 July 1969.  Large copepods
were found to be the predominant food source for alewife.
Hogman ( 1971 ) examined stomach contents of larval
whitefish collected in central Green Bay in May, 1968-1970.
Cyclops bicuspidatus was the most prevalent food source
followed by Diaptomus spp., Daphnia, and Bosmina.
        In summary, our knowledge of Lake Michigan zooplankton
has barely advanced beyond basic descriptive natural history.
Very little is known concerning the ecology of planktonic
Protozoa and Rotifera.  Most investigations have concentrated
                            B-22

-------
on the larger zooplankton Crustacea.  Some knowledge has
been gained about their species composition, distribution
in space (vertical and horizontal) and time (seasonal),
and their importance as food for certain planktivorous
fish.  Our knowledge of response of zooplankton to
specific pollutants and overall changes in water quality
is indeed depauperate.

III.  ZOOPLANKTON STUDIES IN THE CALUMET AREA

       The first samples of Lake Michigan zooplankton
made available to science were strained from the City of
Chicago water supply by a public works official, B. W.
Thomas (Ward l8?9).  Thomas sent samples of organisms
to several experts of the day including E. A. Birge and
S. A. Forbes.  Birge (1882) and Forbes (1882) both
published brief species lists of micro-crustaceans found
in the samples.  Several of the species (Diaptomus sicilis,
Epischura lacustris, and Cyclops thomasi, now known as
C_. blcuspidatus thomas i) reported by Forbes (1882) were
new to science at that time.  The species lists provided
in these two papers are undoubtedly incomplete and many
more species have been reported for the Calumet area.
Their importance today is primarily as historical documents.
       The collection of plankton at the City of Chicago
water works, which was begun by B. W. Thomas nearly 100
years ago, has been continued by subsequent workers.
                            B-23

-------
Routine collections and quantitative enumeration of total
plankton have been regular procedures in water analysis
since 1926.  As pointed out earlier, phytoplankton and
zooplankton counts are combined, thus rendering these
data of little use in analysis of zooplankton information.
If zooplankters are specifically mentioned at all, only
data for the most common genera of Rotifers, Copepoda, and
Cladocera are mentioned (Baylis and Gerstein 1929;
Lackey 19UU; Damann 19lj.5).  Although these data have been
adequate for purposes of water filtration plant operation,
they are not adequate for detecting long-term changes in
zooplankton species composition and abundance commensurate
with changes in water quality.  Identification of zooplankton
to the species level and separation of phytoplankton and
zooplankton counts would have been invaluable in augmenting
our limited knowledge of zooplankton ecology in the
Calumet region.
       Williams (1962; 1966) presented quantitative data
on abundance and generic composition of predominant rotifers
from five water intakes around the Great Lakes including
one station at Gary, Indiana (Table B-2).   The  Gary  station
exhibited a higher number of rotifer genera (15) than any
other station in the Great Lakes, but only the five  most
abundant genera were identified.  The Gary water intake
station had relatively high mean numbers of individuals per
unit volume and this was correlated with relatively high
phytoplankton counts.  On the basis of results from 128
                          B-24

-------
Table B-2. Dominant planktonic  rotifers from selected Great  Lakes sampling stations
            (Williams, 1966).
Rotifers in
semimonthly plankton samples,
counts/liter,
Lakes and stations













w
i
On
Lake Huron, Port Huron,
Michigan
Lake Michigan, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin
Lake Michigan, Gary,
Indiana
Lake Superior, Sault Ste.
Marie, Michigan
Lake Superior, Duluth,
Minnesota
CO H- €
At 1-4 l_|.
{JJ 3 r*
3 Q* ft
^3 h1" 3^
n> H* tn
QJ
O C O
Ht 01 h|
(— •
*>5T 3
oo o
•o n
CO ft) u)
01 H
3
•o
1— •
(D
CO


11

9

15

6

5
Z co
C 01

O* *T3
fD I—1
W O

O 0
M> M>

ua *>.
t) 00
3
0) CO
n o»
01 3
i—"
(D
CO


14

63

45

12

8
>
(D
0)
03
0)

3
C

tr
n

H*
M




.1 0

.7 1

.3 0

.0 0

.5 0
1961
and
1962
Five most abundant
network — averages
May to


w x
n n>
fli H
O 01
3* rt
(->• fl)
O 1-
3 j— •
C 01
CO




.7 33.1

.2 82.0

.9 38.6

.3 4.2

15.2

















TJ
o
i—*
•^
01
H
rt
3*
n
0)




12.5


45.0


22.4


8.0


3.0
genera of
for 24
the
samples from
November















1

5

3

1

1


w
"^
3
n
3*
01
n
rt
0)





.3

.9

.4

.3

.2















2

1

1

0



H3
H
H-
O
3*
O
O
fD
H
o
0)




.5

.5

.9

.7

0.3


U.H
0
iQ ft
n> oi
3 M
H 0
01 M)

ft
ro



50.2

135.1

67.3

19.6

19.8

-------
stations on water courses throughout the United States,
Williams (1966) concluded that high numbers of rotifers
were consistently found in waters or high clarity and
high phytoplankton concentrations.  Zooplankton Crustacea
were not identified in his study, but Copepoda averaged
three times more abundant tha n Cladocera in 214. samples
collected from July, I960 to July, 1961 at the Gary,
Indiana water intake (Williams 1962).
       The investigation by Eddy (192?) was the first
attempt to analyze species composition, abundance, and
seasonal distribution in the Calumet area of Lake
Michigan.  He obtained samples from Lake Michigan in
November through December, 188?; April through October,
1888; October, 1926; and May and July, 192?.  This paper
contains the most complete species list of planktonic
Protozoa, Rotifera, Cladocera, and Copepoda available
for the Calumet area of Lake Michigan.  He reported 9
species of non-photosynthetic protozoans, 16 species of
rotifers, 11 cladocerans, and 9  copepods.  Most species
were typical of limnetic conditions, but some littoral and
benthic forms were also present  because collections were
made so close  to shore.
       The list of species presented by Eddy (192?) is
difficult to interpret because of subsequent changes in
taxonomic nomenclature.  For example, Eddy listed  the
cladoceran, Bosmina longispina,  in his collections.
                         B-26

-------
Wells (I960) only found Bosmina longirostris in his study
off the eastern coast of Lake Michigan in 195i|-55.  Based
upon the results in these two studies, Beeton (1965)
suggested that B. longispina (=? B. coregoni) was replaced
by B. longirostris in Lake Michigan and used this alleged
species shift as an indicator of advancing eutrophication.
However, because of taxonomic problems in the genus Bosmina
(Deevey and Deevey 1971) and since Eddy's samples have
evidently been discarded long ago, the exact identity of
his Bosmina longispina remains unknown and this indication
of advancing eutrophication must be considered dubious.
       Likewise, Brooks (1969) attempted to determine shifts
in abundance of various Lake Michigan zooplankters between
1927 and 195U by comparing data of Eddy (192?) and Wells
(I960).  He suggested that there had been a shift toward
zooplankton that are larger and more efficient at filtering
phytoplankton between 1927 and 195U-  He further suggested
that the larger zooplankters, due to their effectiveness
in cropping phytoplankton, may be ". . .a factor in the
preservation of the oligotrophic condition of that lake."
(Brooks 1969>.  However, Eddy (1927) and Wells (I960) sampled
entirely different portions of Lake Michigan using widely
divergent methods of collection.  Any conclusions drawn
                          B-27

-------
from these data on changes in zooplankton populations in



Lake Michigan should be viewed as extremely tenuous.



       Airther difficulties in the interpretation of Eddy's



(1927) study also exist.   The 1587-88 dats W9*e treated



only qualitatively while some quantitative information



was given for the 1926-27 collections.  Any changes in



abundance or distribution between the two series of



collections are not readily detectable.   Samples during



the important winter months were lacking so the information



on seasonal d! stribution of many species is incomplete.



Although this paper was a landmark in plankton investigations



of large lakes, its utility in interpretation of relations



between zooplankton population dynamics  and water quality



changes in the Calumet area of Lake Michigan is limited.



       A brief study was conducted in fall, 1?70 by



Industrial Bio-test Laboratories, Inc. (1971) on tne



effects of a thermal plume on zooplankton species composition



and distribution.  The plume of hot water was from the Bailey



electric power generating station near Gar^y, Indians.  The



thermal plume at this plant remained as  a contiguous water



mass because the plume area was protected from prevailing



winds and current action by a large breakwater.  Total
                          B-28

-------
numbers of zooplankton Crustacea were substantially higher
inside the plume than in an area beyond the plume's
influence.  Cladocerans (mainly Daphnia retrocurva and
Bosmina longirostris) and the calanoid copepod, Burytemora
affinis, were noticeably more abundant inside the plume
than outside it.  Further studies wouia be required to
disclose if this is a prominent and consistent feature of
heated water plumes in the Calumet area.
       The investigation by Johnson (1972) contains
the most pertinent information on zooplankton species
composition, inshore distribution, and abundance available
for the Calumet area.  Stations were aampled along three
transects off Gary, Burns Harbor, and Michigan City, Indiana
on seven dates from June through October, 1970 (Figure B-2).
A small Wisconsin plankton net with 76 MM mesh size was
used as the collecting device.  The small diameter of the
net and the fine mesh size possibly biased these data since
larger species of zooplankton Crustacea are capable of net
avoidance.  In addition, clogging of the fine mesh by
phytoplankton likely reduced the filtration efficiency of
the net.  Consequently, calculations of zooplankton
abundance may be low by as much as 50 percent (Gannon 1972a),
                         B-29

-------
                                                        N
 41°50'
                   LAKE  MICHIGAN
                       18m
                                                            Michigan
                                                            City
h 41
Hammond, East
Chicago, Gary
Metropolitan Area
                ^            10000
                jittle Calumet R-i ga ea
                                                       Feet
                                                    10000   30000  50000
                                     20000
                                            5000
                             40000

                                15000
                INOANA
                                 0   .     10000
                                   Statute Miles
                                  357   9

                                 11	13
                                .. BJJJH I
87°30'
87W20'
87°10'
024
   87°00'
	t
                                                          8
 10  12
 86°50'
	i
  Figure B-2. Indiana waters of Lake Michigan showing sampling stations along transects
     from Gary (0), Burns Ditch (B), and Michigan City (M),  Indiana at depths of
     5, 10, 15, and 18 m. (Prom Johnson 1972)

-------
       Johnson (1972) recorded 10 species of Copepoda and

!!<. species of Cladocera and Rotifers in the study area

(Table B"3)•Bosmina longirostris, Daphnia retrocurva, and

Cyclops bicuspidatus were the most abundant crustacean

zooplankters throughout the study period (Figures B-3, B-4 and


B~5  ).  There were few consistent patterns in zooplankton

abundance  and distribution between the three transects.

However, biomass of zooplankton Crustacea was generally

higher at Michigan City and Gary stations than at Burns

Harbor (Figures B-6,  B-7,  B-8).   Although sampling methods


employed in this study may have underestimated population

numbers, the abundance of zooplantoon at all stations  in

the Indiana waters were considerably higher than values

reported for elsewhere in Lake Michigan.  Total numbers

of zooplankton Crustacea in the Indiana waters ranged from
                                          o
about 225,000 to 375,000 individuals per m  .  These values

are approximately 10 times higher than biomass figures

reported for the offshore waters of Lake Michigan (Wells

I960; Gannon 1972a), and two  to three times higher than

values reported by Eddy (1927) for a sample collected near

Chicago, Illinois on 10 July  1927.  Comparable numbers have

been reported only in Milwaukee Harbor, at  the mouth  of

the Pox River in Green Bay (Gannon 1972a),  and near the

southwestern shore of Lake Michigan (Roth and Stewart 1973),

       The zooplankton Crustacea community  in the Indiana

waters was characterized by low numbers of  calanoid copepods

relative to cyclopoid copepods and cladocerans.  Phenomenally
                           B-31

-------
Table B-3.  List  of zooplankton found in the Indiana waters
     of Lake Michigan  during 1970 (from Johnson 1972).
 COPEPODA

     CALANOIDA

       Diaptomus  ashlandi
       Diaptomus  minutus
       Diaptomus  oregor^ensis
       Diaptomus  sicilis
       Eurytemora affinTs
        >ischura  lacustris
      Lironocalanus  ma crurus

     CYCLOPOIDA

      Cyclops bi cuspid a tus  thomasi
      Tropocyclops  pra sinus

     HARPACTICOIDA

      Canthocamptus sp.


  CLADOCERA

      Bosmina longirostris
      Bo am In a" coregonT
      Chydorus  gphae^ricus
      Eury c er cus^l.amell a tus
      AIona affinTs
       Leptpdora
       Polyphemus'^ed i culus
       Diaphanosoma  leuchtenbergianum
       Ceriodaphnia  sp.
       Daphnla ret^rocurva
       Daphnia' galeata-mendotae
       Daphnia' longiremis
       Daphnia pulex
                           B-32

-------
Table B-3. (Continued)
 ROTIPERA

      Polyarthra vulgaris
      Keratella"'eochleari3
      KeratelTa" quad rat a
      %ellicott'i_a
      Synchaeta sp.
      Gastropus sp.
      Trichocerca sp.
      Asplanchna priodonta
      Ploesoma truneaturn
      Fompholyx sp.
      Filinia longiseta
      Brachionus angularis
      Brachionus calyciflorus
      Notholca sp.
                            B-33

-------
       Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi
   100
    90
    80
    70
       Other cladocerans 	
       Bosminn  lonqirostris
    60
  c
  o
  W
  a50
  E
  8
  *
   40
    30
    20
   10
             Other copepoda L~l
             Daphnia  retrocurva |['Q
           JUN
JUL
AU6
                                              \
SEP
                                                   OCT
Figure B-3.  Percent species composition of adult crustacean
     zooplankters as a mean 'of all stations on the Michigan
     City  transect in Indiana waters of Lake Michigan, 1970
     (from Johnson 1972).
                        B-34

-------
    Bosmina longirostris [23      Dnphnia  retrocurva  QJJ
    Cyclops bicuspida Lus thomasi  ^M^__^
    Other clndocerans ••          other  cop«pod»I   I
         JUN
JUL
AUO
SEP
OCT
Figure B-4.  Percent species composition of adult crustacean
    zooplankters as a mean of all stations on the Burns
    Ditch transect in Indiana waters of Lake Michigan,  1970
    (from Johnson 1972).
                        B-35

-------
      Bosmina longirostris fy7] Daphnia  retrocurva
      Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi
 100  "
      other cladocerans
           Other  copepods ("""1
  90  -
  80 -
  70 -
  60 -
c
o
•rt
4J
•H
0)
&50 -
  40 -
  30 -
  20 -
  10 -
        JUN
JUL
AUO
SEP
OCT
 Figure B-5.   Percent species composition of adult crustacean
       zobplankters as a mean pf all stations on the Gary
     .  transect in Indiana waters of Lake Michigan, 1970
       (from Johnson 1972).

                           B-36

-------
    400
    350
    300
    250
  41
  •H
   200
   150
   100
    50
Bosmina longiroatris T7\   Daphnia retrocurva
Cyclops bicuepidatug thomaai ffgg
Other cladocerans          Other copepoda
-d2
I
 JUN
                        I
                     JUL
                    1
                                   BBSS
                      AUQ
                                              \
                                 SEP
                                                    OCT
Figure B-6.   Abundance of adult  crustacean  zooplankters  as  a
     mean of all stations on the Michigan City  transect  in
     Indiana waters  of Lake Michigan,  1970  (from  Johnaou 1972)

                         B-37

-------
                                                   No ./liter
I
OJ
00

-------
 400
       Bosmina longirostriji
       Cyclopa
       Other
           Daphnia retrocurva
 350
 300
  250
M

-------
high numbers of a few species of cladocerans and cyclopdd
copopods coupled with low numbers of calanoid copepdods
may indicate a response by the zooplankton community to
nutrient enrichment of the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan
(Gannon 1972b).  The dominance of smaller species and
individuals of zooplankton Crustacea in the Indiana waters
may be the result of heavy alewife predation.  This  conclusion
is augmented by the work of several investigators who found
Cladocera and Copepoda to be predominate food sources of
alewife in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan (Rhodes 1971;
Webb 1973; Webb and McComish 1974; Rhodes and McComish 1975).
       Johnson (1972) reported 12 genera of Rotifera in
the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan (Table B-3)  Polyarthra
was most abundant followed by Keratella, Synchaeta,
Kellicottia, and Trichocerca (Table B-4). Mean numbers of
rotifers per sample were over 100,000 individuals per
m .  These values were approximately 7 times higher than those
reported by Eddy (1927) for a July, 1927 sample off Chicago,
Illinois.  The high numbers of rotifers recorded in 1970
in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan may indicate a
response of the rotifer community to nutrient enrichment.
       The only study tba t has examined the impact of
potential pollutants from the Calumet area on Lake Michigan
zooplankton was conducted by Gannon and Beeton (1969).  They
studied the effects of sediments from nine Great Lakes
harbors, including Calumet and Indiana Harbors, on mortality
of crustacean zooplankters.  The investigation was conducted
                           B-40

-------
     Table B-4. Mean abundance of rotifers in numbers per liter on Michigan City, Burns
                Ditch, and Gary transects in Indiana waters of Lake Michigan, 1970
                (from Johnson 1972).
Cd
I

Transect




Michigan
City
Burns
Ditch
Gary
Mean no.
of rotifers
per sample




109

124
128
Mean of the five
genera per


Poly-
arthra


45

51
42


Kere-
tella


38

41
49


Synch-
aeta


8

13
21
roost common
sample


Kelli-
cottia


9

10
5



Tricho-
cerca


4

2
2
Total mean
of five most
common
genera per
sample


104

117
119

-------
 in the laboratory using sediments collected from five
 stations in Calumet Harbor (Figure B-9) and Indiana
.Harbor (Figure B-10) and from one to five samples in the
 other Great Lakes harbors.  Two sets of experiments were
 run:   one using a laboratory culture of Daphnia^ pulex
 and the other using freshly collected Lake Michigan zoo-
 plankton.  In both tests,  the zooplankters were placed in
 125 ml bottles with different concentrations of suspended
 sediments.  After 1^8 hours, counts of live and dead
 organisms were made.
        Results of the Daphnia puleg and natural Lake
 Michigan zooplankton tests were similar.  In Calumet
 Harbor, significant mortality occurred in the river
 sediment samples but no significant mortality occurred in
 the outer harbor (C-l) sample (Figures B-ll and B-12).  The
 sediment from the outer harbor of Calumet was one of the
 least toxic sediments encountered in the study.  This
 harbor differed from others included in the investigation
 since Lake Michigan water flows into the Calumet River.
 Consequently, there is a continuous influx of relatively
 high quality water into the outer harbor.  In Indiana
 Harbor, highest mortality of zooplankton was observed at
 the innermost stations (Figures B-ll and B-12).  Indiana Harbor
 samples were among the most toxic to plankton and benthos
 encountered during the study.  No attempt was made in this
 investigation to identify the toxic substances responsible
 for the zooplankton mortalities.  However, mortalities
 were generally greatest in samples exhibiting an oily
 texture and a high chemical oxygen demand (Gannon and Beeton
                             B-42

-------
-!>
LO
        LA KE

      CALUMET
                                                                                            Seal* of F««l
                                                                                       1000   0   I    2   5000
Figure  B-9. Location of sampling points, 1968, Calumet river  (from Gannon and  Beeton 1969).

-------
V
  A
        »«
          «b
           v->
              V
                    %
                     > ,A
                         A,
                         ?/
%>
        00  T331S  (JNV1NI

-------
              too
               78
               SO
            o
            3E

w
-p-
Ul
IOO-
87S
1
1 2,
0-


'
:
RH

i \
M 1 F



;
f*
': '. B ' , -
: e : : •
: ; : : . : ; :
':'.': ': '. : i •
; : = It ; ;
C-l C-2|c-3 C-4 C-5 I-
~[ \ f ^ ^ ^
IB
||
t"
l|l-2 1-3 1-4JI-5 GB-l|GB-2


GB-3JGB-<


^GB-5
                                         Control   5ml    lOml   25ml
                                                  Stdiment Dilutions
  Figure B-ll,
Mortality of Daphnr pulex in vario.-s concentrations of harbor sediments
(B, C, CL, GB,  I; M," R.  RK, S, and T) .aid Fuller's Earth (F).   Calumet
Harober (C)  and Indiana Harbor  (I)  (from Gannon  and Beaton 1969)

-------
100
—. 7B
-
£• so
0 25
25


" I


y
-
:
[
T
: :
i I
R-IJR-2

r
e
' r
• : p
; \l
R-3JR-
, _
;

;
;
4 R-5


_








1
tf
|
> S-l JS-2

I
T-

;
. •
; •
,
i

: r
if
i
|T-2|T-3

-
\
:



:



T-4JT-5JCL
I
:
;
; .
-
:
;
'•
:
-
,
.
.- |CL-2|CL-
i





__
: ;
-
• ;


'-
;
;









.
: c

: ;
: :
3 CL-4JCL-5|B- 8
'•
'•
\

:
\[
i
:
;

:
|
-2 B-sJfl-
i
;
;
;
:
-




4 B-5
da
100-p
g 75-
o
k.
o
2 25-




hi
• E
• E
M | R
!
f
:
:
Hi,

: r
-
i :
r C

,
:
:
-l|


3
1
C-2
•
: B
-
; :
C-3 C-
!
~_
-
:
•4]C

•
E
j| :
:-5 I

5
; t
: \
-i i
•

E
1
-2





• i
o :
fe • ;
J| : '
1-3 1-4 I
i
: •
: p :
: , :
: : i
-5 GB- C


-IE
|
5B-5




> C

111
; K
; f
;B--




5C

111
, E
§
3B-<




i

||


S3-5
                                                  I   D   I    I
                                               Control  5ml  10ml 25ml
                                                       Scdimtnt Dilutions

           Figure B-12 .Mortality of zooplankton in various concentrations of harbor sediments (B, C,
                                      T  M  R. RH. S. and  T)  and Fuller's Earth (F).   (from Gannon

-------
IV.  IDBHTIFICATIpy OP DATA GAPS AID RBCOMMEgDATIOyS FOR
       ZOO PLANKTON RESEARCH TM J*Hli CALUMET AREA



       It is readily apparent from the previous discussion

that our knowledge of zooplankton ecology in the Calumet

area of southern Lake Michigan is woefully incomplete.

Basic descriptive information on species composition,

spatial distribution, and seasonal distribution is

inadequate.  Undoubtedly, many species of planktonic

Protozoa, Rotifera, and Crustacea occur in the Calumet

region that have not been previously reported.  The

zooplankton community in a shallow, estuarine region such

as the Calumet area will consist of euliranetic Lake

Michigan species, littoral species, organisms that are

predominately benthic but occasionally are found in the

plankton, and other species most characteristic of rivers.

Stemberger (1973) and Gannon (1972a) have compiled species

lists for the Rotifera and Crustacea, respectively, of

the Milwaukee River estuary.  It is most likely that many

zooplankters occurring in the Milwaukee Harbor region may

also exist in the Calumet area.

       The work of Johnson (1972) has provided some

information on horizontal distribution of zooplankton in

the near-shore waters of the Calumet area.  Seasonal

distribution data is available only for the spring, summer,

and fall months (Eddy 1927; Johnson 1972),  Winter data

are needed in the Calumet area to complete our knowledge
                        B-47

-------
of this important aspect of zooplankton ecology.  Distri-
bution studies on zooplankton ought not be limited to the
Lake Michigan portion of the Calumet area alone.  Although
volumes have been written on pollution problems of the
rivers tributary to Lake Michigan in the Calumet area
(e.g , U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
1965), zooplankters have been ignored.  The contribution
of zooplankton species composition and biomass to the
inshore waters of Lake Michigan from tributaries in the
Calumet region should be investigated.  A background of
descriptive information on species composition and distri-
bution must be acquired before questions on the relations
between zooplankton community structure and water quality
can be tackled.
       Studies on the impact of water quality degradation
on zooplankton in the Calumet area are practically non-
existent.   Zooplankters are known to be sensitive to
toxic pollutarts (e.g., Anderson 19UUK  The extreme reduction
or absence of zooplankters in a given area will be a good
indication of toxic pollution.   On the other hand,  certain
species of zooplankton respond to nutrient loading with
faster growth rates and build up phenomenally high
numbers of individuals in a short time.  High numbers of
a few species in a certain region will be a good indication
of nutrient enrichment.  For example, Johnson (1972)  noted
that Bosmina longirostris was often the most abundant
crustacean zooplankter in the Indiana waters of Lake
                            B-48

-------
Michigan.  Gannon (1972a) observed such high numbers of
this species only in the nutrient enriched waters at the
mouths of the Milwaukee and Pox Rivers.  Consistently high
numbers of Boamina and other zooplankters in the Indiana
waters of Lake Michigan may indicate that nutrient loading
has a greater effect on the zooplankton population than
discharge of toxic wastes.
       The following types of zpoplankton studies are
recommended for applied research in the Calumet area:
1) An examination of plankton records at the City of
Chicago Department of Water and Sewers wouti be desirable.
If it is possible to separate phytoplankton and zooplankton
counts, valuable information on changes in zooplankton
abundance with time may be discernable.
2) Field studies on the species composition and distri-
bution of zooplankton in the Calumet region.  I'hese
investigations should include stations in the lower portions
of the Calumet River complex and Burns Ditch.  The purpose
of such studies should be to identify areas where the
zooplankton community is responding to toxic wastes and/or
nutrient loading.  Taxonomic identification to the species
level is imperative if worthwhile data are to be gained.
Protozoa and Rotifera may provide more valuable information
than Crustacea since the smaller organisms have a high
reproductive capacity and can respond quicker to environ-
mental changes than the larger Crustacea.   Analysis of
                          B-49

-------
zooplankton community structure may be more valuable



than looking for single indicator species of water



quality.  Gannon (1972b) suggested that the relative



proportion of calanoid copepods to cladocerans and rotifers



may be a useful ratio in indicating changes in water



quality of the Great Lakes.  Schelske and Roth (1973)



successfully used this ratio to characterize zooplankton



response to water quality in Lakes Michigan, Superior,



Huron, and Erie.



3) Laboratory bioassay studies using zooplankton would



be most useful in identifying the reaponse or zooplankton



to specific pollutants in the Calumet area.  Such studies



would be invaluable in setting effluent and water quality



standards in the southern Lake Michigan region.
                            B-50

-------
               CITED
Ahlstrom, E. H.  1936.  The deep-water plankton of Lake
  Michigan, exclusive of the Crustacea.  Trans. Amer.
  Microsc. Soc., 55:  239-299.

Anderson, B. G.  19i|H.  The toxicity thresholds of various
  substances found  in industrial wastes  as determined by
  the use of Daphnia magna.  Sewage Works J., 16:  1156-1165.

Ayers, J. C. and J. C. K. Huang.  1967.  Studies of
  Milwaukee Harbor  and embayment, p. 372-39U.   In: Ayers,
  J. C.  and D. C. Chandler.  Studies on  eutrophTcation in
  Lake Michigan.  Univ. Michigan, Great  Lakes Res. Div.,
  Spec.  Rept. No. 30, lj.15 pp.

Ayers, J. C. and E. Seibel.  1973.  Benton Harbor Power
  Plant  Limnological Studies, Part XIII.  Cook Plant
  Preoperational Studies 1972.  Univ. Michigan Great Lakes
  Res. Div., Spec.  Rept. No. L^, 256 pp.

Balch, R. P., K. M. Mackenthun, W. M. Van Horn, and T. P.
  Wisniewski.  1956.  Biological studies of  the Fox River
  and Green Bay from cooperative state-industry surveys of
  the lower Pox River and Green Bay made in  1955-1956.
  Wisconsin Comm. on Water Poll., Bull.  WP102,  7l+ pp.

Baylis,  J. R. and K. M. Gerstein.  1929.  Microorganisms in  the
  jake water at Chicago.  Municipal News & Wat. Wks., 76:  291-296.

Beeton,  A. n.  1?65-  Eutrophication of  the  St. Lawrence
  Great  Lakes.  Limnol. Oceangr. , 10:  2L.O-25U-

Birge, S. A.  1882.  Notes on Crustacea  in Chicago water
  supply with remarks on the formation of the carapace.
  Chicago Med. J. & Exam.., U3 (l8Rl):  58U-590.

Brooks,  J. L.  1969.  Sutrophioaticn and changes in the
  coriponition of the zooplankton, p. 236-255.   In;  Eutrophication:
  causes, consequences, correctives, Nat. Acad. Sci.,
  Washington, D.C., 661 pp.

Damann,  K. E.  19U5.  Plankton studies of Lake Michigan.
  I.  Seventeen years of plankton data collected at Chicago,
  Illinois.  Amer.  Midi. Natur. , 314.:  769-796.

Damann,  K. E.  I960.  Plankton studies on Lake Michigan.
  II.  Thirty-three years of plankton uata collected at
  Chicago, Illinois.  Trans. Amer. Mjcrosc.  Soc., 79:  397-^Oij,.

Damann,  K. E.  1966. Plankton studies of Lake Michigan.
  III.   Seasonal periodicity of total plankton.  Proc. 9th
  Conf.  Great Lakes Res., Univ. Mic?aigan, Great Lakes Res
  Div.,  Publ. TTo. 15:  9-17.
                             B-51

-------
Deevey,  E. S., Jr.  and G. B. Deevey.   1971.   The American
   species of  Eubosmina Seligo  (Crustacea,  Cladocera).
   Limnol. Oceanogr., 16:  201-218.

Eddy, S.  1927.  The plankton  of Lake  Michigan.   Bull.  Illinois
   State  Div.  Natur. Hist. Surv., 17(10 :  203-232.

Forbes,  S. A.  1882.  On some  Entomostraca of Lake Michigan
   and adjacent waters.  Amer.  Natur.,  16:  537-5^2;  6UO-6ij.9.

Forbes,  S. A.  1883.  The first food of  the  common white-
   fish (Coregonus clupeiformis  Mitch.).   Illinois Natur.
   Hist.  SurvT Bull., 1 (6):8*7-99.

Forbes,  S. A.  1888.  Notes on the first food  of the
   whitefish.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 17:   59-66.

Gannon,  J. E.  1969.  Great Lakes plankton investigations:
   A bibliography.  Univ. Wisconsin-Milwaukee,  Center for
   Great Lakes Studies, Spec. Rept. No. 7,  65 pp.

Gannon,  J. E.  1972a.  A contribution  to the ecology of
   zooplankton Crustacea of Lake Michigan and Green Bay.
  Unpubl. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Wisconsin, 257  pp.

Gannon,  J. E.  1972b.  Effects of eutrophication  and fish
  predation on recent changes in zooplankton Crustacea
   species composition in Lake Michigan.  Trans. Amer.
  Microsc. Soc., 91:  82-81+.

Gannon, J. E. and A. M. Beeton.  1969.  Studies on the effects  of
  dredged materials from selected Great Lakes  harbors on plankton
  and benthos.  Univ. Wise on sin-Milwaukee, Center  for Great Lakes
  Studies, Spec. Rept. No.  8, 82 pp.

Hogman, W. J.  1971.  The larvae of the lake whitefish
   CCoregonus clupeaformis (Mitchell)] of Green Bay,  Lake
  Michigan.   Unpubl. Ph.D.  Diss., Univ. Wisconsin, 126 pp.

Howmiller, R. P.   1973.  A review of selected  research on
  the biology and sediments of southern Lake Michigan with
  particular reference to the Calumet area.  Appendix A, this  raport.

Industrial Bio-test Laboratories, Inc.  1971.  Northern
   Indiana Public Service Company, Bailey Generating  Station,
  Nuclear 1, Environmental Report.

Industrial Bio-test Laboratories, Inc.  1972.  Evaluation
   of thermal effects in southwestern Lake Michigan in the
   vicinity of the Waukegan and Zion generating stations,
  April  1971 through March 1972.  Unpubl. report  submitted
   to Commonwealth Edison Co.

Jennings, H. S.  1896.  Report on the Rotatoria  - with
  description of a new species, p. 85-93.  In:  Ward, H.  B.,
  A biological examination or Lake Michigan~Tn the Traverse
   Bay region.  Bull. Mich. Fish. Comm., No.  6, 99 pp.
                         B-52

-------
Johnson, D. L.  1972.  Zooplankton population dynamics  in
  Indiana waters of Lake Michigan in 1970.  TJnpubl. M,S.
  Thesis, Ball State Univ., 129 pp.

Kofoid, C. A.  1896.  A report upon the Protozoa observed
  in Lake Michigan and the inland lakes in  the neighbor-
  hood of Gharlevoix, during the summer of  l89U» P» 76-814..
  In:  Ward, H. B., A biological examination of Lake
  Michigan in the Traverse Bay region.  Bull. Michigan
  Pish. Comm., Ho. 6, 99 pp.

Lackey, J. B.  19^.  Quality and quantity  of plankton  in
  the south end of Lake Michigan in 19^2.   J. Amer. Water
  Works Assoc., 36:  669-6714..

Lane, P. A. and D. C. McHaught.  1970.  A mathematical
  analysis of the niches of Lake Michigan zooplankton.
  Proc. 13th Conf. Great Lakes Res., Internat. Assoc.
  Great Lakes Res., p. V7-57.

Manny, B. A. and A. S. Hall.  1969.  Diurnal changes in
  stratification and dissolved oxygen in the surface waters
  of Lake Michigan.  Proc. 12th Conf. Great Lakes Res.,
  Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., p. 622-63U*

Marsh, C. D.  1895.  On the Cyclopidae and  Calanidae of
  Ldke St. Clair, Lake Michigan, and certain of the inland
  lakes of Michigan.  Bull. Mich. Pish. Comm., 5, 214, pp.

Marsh, G. D.  1909.  A revision of tha North American
  species of Cyclops.  Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci., Arts,
  Lett., 16, Pt. 2 (3):  1067-113U.

Marsh, C. D.  1929.  Distribution and key of the North
  American copepods of the genus Diaptomus, with a descrip-
  tion of a new species.  Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 75?  1-27.

McNaught, D. C.  1966.  Depth control by planktonic
  cladocerans in Lake Michigan.  Proc. 9th Conf. Great  Lakes
  Res., Univ. Michigan, Great Lakes Res. Div., Publ. No.
  15:  98-108.

McNaught, D. C. and A. D. Hasler.  1966.  Photoenvironments
  of planktonic Crustacea in Lake Michigan.  Verh. int.
  Ver. Limnol., 16:  19U-203.

Morsell, J. W. and C. R. Norden.  1968.  Pood habits of the
  alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus (Wilson), in Lake Michigan.
  Proc. llth Conf. Great Lakes Res., Int. Assoc. Great  Lakes
  Res., p. 96-102.
                           B-53

-------
Norden, C. R.  1968.  Morphology and food habits of the
  larval alewife, Aloaa pseudoharengus (Wilson), in Lake
  Michigan.  Proc. llth Conf. Great Lakes Res., Int.
  Assoc. Great Lakes Res., p. 103-110.

Powers, C. P., A. Robertson, S. A. Czaika, and W. P.
  Alley.  1967.  Lake Michigan biological data, 196U-66,
  p. 179-187.  In;  Ayers, J. C. and D. C. Chandler.
  Studies on the eutrophication of Lake Michigan.  Univ.
  Michigan, Great Lakes Res. Div. , Spec. Rept. No. 30,
      PP-
Rhodes, R. J.  1971.  The food habits of the alewife in
  Indiana waters of Lake Michigan.  Unpubl. MS. Thesis,
  Ball State Univ. , 82 pp.

Rhodes, R. J. and T. S. McComish.  1975.  Observations on
  the alewife 's food habits in Indiana's waters of Lake
  Michigan in 1970.  Ohio J. Sci., 75:  in press.

Robertson, A.  1966.  The distribution of calanoid copepoda
  in the Great Lakes.  Proc. 9th Conf. Great Lakes Res.,
  Univ. Michigan, Great Lakes Res. Div., Publ. No. 15:
  129-139.

Robertson, A.  1968.  Abundance, distribution and biology
  of plankton in Lake Michigan with the addition of a Research
  Ships of Opportunity Project.  Univ. Michigan, Great
  Lakes Res. Div., Publ. No. 35, U2 pp.

Robertson, A. and C. P. Powers.  1965.  Particulate organic
  matter in Lake Michigan.  Proc. 8th Conf. Great Lakes
  Res., Univ. Michigan, Great Lakes Res. Div., Publ. No. 13:
  175-181.

Robertson, A. and C. P. Powers.  1967.  Comparison of the
  distribution of organic matter in the five Great Lakes,
  p. 1-18.   In;  Ayers, J. C. and D. C. Chandler, Studies
  on the eutrophication of Lake Michigan.  Univ. Michigan,
  Great Lakes Res. Div., Spec. Rept. No. 30, Ul5 PP.

 Roth,  J.  C.  and  J.  A.  Stewart.   1973.  Nearshore  zooplankton
   of southeastern  Lake Michigan,  1972.  Proc. 10th Conf.
   Great  Lakes Res.,  Internat.  Assoc.  Great Lakes  Res.,
   p.  132-142.

 Schacht, P. W.   1897.  The North American  species of Diaptomus .
   Bull. Illinois State Lab. Natur. Hist., 5, Art. 3:  97-207.

 Schacht, P. W.   1898.  The North American Centropagidae
  belonging  to the  genera Osphranticum, Limnoealanus,
   and  Epischura.   Bull.  Illinois State Lab. Natur. Hist.
   5, Art. k:  225-270.
                            B-54

-------
Schelske, C. L.  and J. C. Roth.   1973.  LimnologJoal  survey
  of Lakes Michigan, Superior, Huron, and  Erie.  Univ.
  Michigan, Great Lakes Res. Div.,  Publ. No.  17, 108 pp.

Stemberger, R.   1973.  Temporal  and spatial distributions
  of rotifers in Milwaukee Harbor and adjacent Lake  Michigan.
  Unpubl. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Wisconsin-Milwaukee,  55 PP-

Swain, W. R., T. A. Olson, and T. 0. Odlaug.  1968.
  Preliminary studies of zooplankton distribution  with  the
  continuous plankton recorder.   Water Resources Res.
  Cntr., Univ. Minnesota, Bull.  No.  7, 21  pp.

Swain, W. R., T. A. Olson, and T. 0. Odlaug.  1970.   The
  ecology of the second trophic  level in Lakes Superior,
  Michigan, and  Huron.  Univ. Minnesota, Water Resources
  Res. Cntr., Bull. No. 26, 151  pp.

Torke, B. G.  1971.  Cladocera of Lake Michigan:   Inshore-
  offshore differences in the Milwaukee area.  Unpubl.  M.S.
  Thesis, Univ.  Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 21* pp.

Torke, B. G.  1972.  The distribution of planktonic  Crustacea
  in southern Green Bay on 12 July  1971, p. U5-55.   In;
  R. P. Howmiller and A. M. Beeton, Report on a cruise  of
  the R/V Neeskay in central Lake Michigan and Green Bay,
  8-III July 1971, Univ. Wi scon sin-Mi Iwaukee, Center  for
  Great Studies, Spec. Rept. No.  13, 71 pp.

U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.   1965.
  Conference in  the matter of pollution of the interstate
  waters of the  Grand Calumet River, Little Crlumet  River,
  Calumet River, Wolf  Lake, Lake Michigan and their
  tributaries, Proceedings, Vol.  1, March 2-9, 1965.

Ward, H. B.  1895-  The food supply of the Great Lakes;
  and some experiments on its amount and distribution.
  Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc., 17:   2l|.2-25i|..

Ward, H. B.  1896.  A biological  examination of Lake Michigan
  in the Traverse Bay region.  Bull. Mich. Pish.  Comm.,
  No. 6, 99pp.

Ward, R. H.  1879.  Purity of lake water.   Amer.  Natur.,
  13:  53U-535.

Wells, L.  I960.   Seasonal abundance and vertical movements
  of planktonic Crustacea in Lake Michigan.  U.S. Pish.
  Wildl. Serv.,  Pish.  Bull., 60:  3ij.3-369.

Wells, L. and A.  M.  Beeton.   1963.  Pood of the bloater,
  Coregonus hoyi, in Lake Michigan.   Trans. Amer. Pish. Soc.,
  92:  2U5'25FT~


                             B-55

-------
Wells, L.  1970.  Effects of alewife predation on zooplankton
  populations.  Limnol. Oceanogr., 15:  556-565-

Williams, L. G.  1962.  Plankton population dynamics.
  Nat. Water Qual. Netwk., U.S. Publ. Health Serv., Publ.
  No. 663, Suppl. 2, 90 pp.

Williams, L. G.  1966.  Dominant planktonic rotifers of
  major waterways of the United States.  Liranol. Oceanogr.,
  11:  83-91.

Webb, D.  A.   1973.  Daily and  seasonal movements and food
  habits  of  the  alewife  in Indiana waters of Lake Michigan
  near Michigan  City,  Indiana, in 1971 and 1972.  Proc.
  Indiana Acad.  Sci. 83:  in press.
                           B-56

-------
                APPENDIX C
DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT SOURCES
     AND COMPARISON OF EFFLUENT DATA
                   Ci

-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                            P
1.   INTRODUCTION 	    1
2.   AMERICAN MAIZE COMPANY 	    3
    2.1  Introduction  	    3
    2.2  Data Evaluation	    3
3.   AMERICAN OIL COMPANY 	    b
    3.1  Introduction  	    5
    3.2  Data Evaluation	    5
    3.3  Waste Treatment 	    8
4.   UNION CARBIDE  	    9
    4.1  Introduction  	    9
    4.2  Chemicals and Plastics Division - Whiting ....    9
         4.2.1  Wastewater Discharge 	    9
         4.2.2  Wastewater Treatment 	   10
    4.3  Linde Air Products Division,  East Chicago ....   10
         4.3.1  Wastewater Discharge 	   10
         4.3.2  Wastewater Treatment 	   12
         4.3.3  T-1200 Plant - Gary	   12
5.   ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY 	   13
    5.1  Introduction	   13
    5.2  Data Evaluation	   13
    5.3  Waste Treatment	   16
6.   E.  I. DU PONT	   IS
    6.1  Introduction	   18
    6.2  Discharges	   18
    6.3  Proposed Effluent Loads 	   18
    6.4  Waste Treatment	   18
7.   BETHLEHEM STEEL	   23
    7.1  Introduction	   23
    7.2  Data Evaluation	   23
    7.3  Waste Treatment	   23
                              Cii

-------
                   TABLE OF CONTENTS (cent.)

                                                            Page
8.   MIDWEST STEEL - PORTAGE	    25
    8.1  Introduction	    25
    8.2  Data Evaluation	    25
    8.3  Waste Treatment	    27
9.   INLAND STEEL COMPANY 	    28
    9.1  Introduction	    28
    9.2  Data Evaluation	    28
    9.3  Waste Treatment	    34
10. YOUNGSTOWH SHEET AND TUBE CO., EAST CHICAGO  	    36
    10.1 General Description 	    36
    10.2 Data Evaluation	    36
    10.3 Waste Treatment	    38
    10.4 Unreported Discharges 	    43
11. U.S. STEEL - GARY	    44
    11.1 Introduction	    44
    11.2 General Description - Water Discharges  	    44
    11.3 Parameter Evaluation  .   ,	,  .    48
    11.4 Waste Treatment Facilities  	    50
    11.5 Alternate Waste Lines 	    55
    11.6 American Bridge and Universal Atlas Cement
         Divisions	    56
12. U.S. STEEL SOUTH WORKS	    58
    12.1 Introduction	    58
    12.2 Outfall Descriptions  	    58
    12.3 Evaluation	    58
REFERENCES	    64
                              Ciii

-------
                         LIST OF TABLES

Table
  1     American Maize Discharges	     4
  2     American Oil Company Outfall 002 Data Comparison .     7
  3     Union Carbide, Chemical & Plastics Division
        Effluent Data Comparison of NPDES Data,  Operating
        Reports and Effluent Survey	    11
  4     Atlantic-Richfield NPDES Data Comparison Parameters
        Showing Increase 	    15
  5     E.  I.  DuPont Effluent Loads	    21
  6     Midwest Steel Effluent Data,  Comparison  of NPDES
        with Monthly Operating Reports to ISPCB  and
        U.S.  EPA Survey	    26
  7     Inland Steel Company Outfall Summary 	    30
  8     Inland Steel Company Effluent Concentrations  ...    31
  9     Inland Steel Effluent Concentrations,  Comparison
        of  NPDES and ISPCB 24-hr Samples,  July 11,  1973  .    32
 10     Inland Steel Monthly Operating Report Data ....    33
 11     Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company,  NPDES and ISPCB
        Outfall Identification and Flows  	    37
 12     Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company Effluent
        Concentrations   	    39
 13     Youngstown Sheet and Tube Effluent Data,  Compari-
        son of NPDES,  Monthly Operating Reports  and
        Effluent Surveys 	    40
 14     U.S.  Steel Gary Works Outfall Summary	    47
 15     U.S.  Steel Effluent Concentrations 	    49
 16     U.S.  Steel Gary Works Effluents,  Comparison of
        EPA Analysis with Permit Application 	    51
 17     U.S.  Steel Gary Works Effluent Concentrations,
        Comparison of NPDES,  Monthly Operating Reports
        and Effluent Surveys 	    52
 18     U.S.  Steel South Works Interim Effluent  Concen-
        trations at Outfall 006	    62
                              Civ

-------
                        LIST OF FIGURES

Figure                                                      Pag(
   1    Detail Map Showing Outfalls from American Oil
        Co.  and Union Carbide	    6
   2    Detail Map of Indiana Harbor Canal Discharges ...   14
   3    Atlantic-Richfield Waste Treatment Flowsheet  ...   17
   4    Detail Map of Grand Calumet River Discharges  ...   19
   5    E.  I.  DuPont Outfalls Prior to December 1973  ...   20
   6    Detail Map of Burns Ditch Discharges  	   24
   7    Detail Map Showing Outfalls from Inland and
        Youngstown Steel Cos	29
   8    Inland Steel Company Terminal Waste Treatment ...   35
   9    Detail Map Showing Outfalls of Gary Works U.S.
        Steel  Corp	45
  10    Detail Map of Buffington Harbor Discharges  ....   57
  11    Outfall Locations 	   59
  12    Existing Proposed Water Use and Wastewater System .   61
                              Cv

-------
           DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT SOURCES
                AND COMPARISON OF EFFLUENT DATA
1.   INTRODUCTION
     This appendix was prepared under a subcontract by Citizens
for a Better Environment.  It provides more detailed information
than was given in Chapter 4 (Vol. I of this report).  It contains
tables showing the effluent flows and conpositions for the major
industrial facilities, and compares effluent data from NPDES
permit applications with industry monthly operating reports, and
24-hr effluent sampling done by Indiana and U.S. EPA.  In the
case of two industries, it presents the effluent performance that
is being implemented as a result of court-enforced agreements.
     Table 4.1 and Figure 4.1 in Chapter 4 locate the industries
and effluent sources in the Calumet area.  Chapter 4 contains
summary tables giving the loads of major pollutants from all
outfalls to Lake Michigan , as well as summary tables of loads
from all outfalls entering Lake Michigan via the IHC.  More
detailed tables of loads from outfalls on the IHC are presented
in the Combinatorics (1974) report, and some of these tables have
been included in Chapters 13 to 18.  This appendix contains
further detailed data on large industrial facilities discharging
to the IHC.  In general there is reasonable agreement with
Combinatorics (1974).
     Information on  the various effluent sources was gathered
primarily  from U.S.  EPA files, NPDES permit applications, Indiana
Stream Pollution Control Board files and in some instances  from
the industries concerned.  Although this appendix represents an
extensive  compilation of data, it by no means contains all  the
relevant data available.
     Wide  discrepancies have been noted in the  amount of data
available  on each effluent source.  Generally,  the more serious
the pollution, the more available is source data.  For many minor
industrial discharges, often the only  data available are in the
NPDES permit application.
                               C-l

-------
     Of the various data sources utilized, perhaps the NPDES
permit application data when used in conjunction with the U.S.
EPA file is the most valuable.  The NPDES application includes
detailed information relating to the effluent discharge including
flow, parameter concentrations and treatment methods.  Additional
information from the U.S. EPA file can be used to update the
NPDES and offer more detailed information relating to waste
treatment facilities and the industry's litigation record.  EPA
surveillance reports are also available in these files and can
be used as a cross-check on NPDES data.  The NPDES applications
were originally submitted in mid-1971, based on measurements
made in late 1970.
     The files of the Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board are
useful primarily for ISPCB effluent surveillance reports.  These
reports are filed approximately once a year and can be used to
cross-check NPDES data and observe more recent changes in effluent
quality.  Also in ISPCB files are monthly operating reports filed
by the industries,  These data can be used as a cross-check, but
often very few outfalls and parameters are reported.  In the
tables in this appendix we used only the most recent monthly
operating reports (April and May 1973) for comparison with NPDES
data, since these reports should reflect the most up-to-date
effluent conditions.
     Information from industries was valuable and often provided
further clarification.
                               C-2

-------
2.   AMERICAN MAIZE COMPANY
     2.1  Introduction
     American Maize Company located in Hanniond, Indiana, produces
cornstarch and corn syrup from shelled corn (NPDES application).
     2.2  Data Evaluation
     The company has six discharges, one into Lake Michigan and
five others into the Wolf River Channel which flows into the Wolf
Lake.  Table C-l indicates discharge location, flow and usage.
     Outfall 001 discharges into Lake Michigan with treated pro-
cess waste water.  The plant effluent is typically high in BOD,
but after biological treatment, installed in 1969, BOD is reduced
to an average of 13 tng/fc as reported in the July 1973 ISPCB
Monthly Operating Report.  Ammonia-nitrogen and total phosphorus
values reported in the NPDES Application are 1.57 mg/£ and 0.51
mg/£, respectively.  These,  however, are not included in monthly
operating reports to the ISPCB, therefore, no accurate data are
available concerning their present discharge concentration.
Effluent data for discharge 001 are included in Table 4.2,
Chapter 4.
     Discharges 002-005 are indicated in the NPDES application
to be noncontact cooling water.  Consequently, American Maize has
not submitted parameter data other than flow,  pH, temperature,
and chlorine as OC1~.  Waste treatment at this plant consists of
two primary settling tanks, an aerated lagoon used as an activated
sludge unit, a clarifier and two additional aerated lagoons from
which the final effluent flows to Lake Michigan.   The monthly
operating reports submitted to the ISPCB indicate that batch
processes may cause peak effluent concentrations  to occur once
or twice a month.  These reports show peak COD and BOD concen-
trations of several times the average.  This may  explain a light-
colored plume from American Maize seen in Lake Michigan during
the IITRI aerial surveillance.
                               C-3

-------
                          Table C-l



                 AiMERICAN MAIZE DISCHARGES
  Discharge
    001
    002
    003
    004
    005
Unnumbered
Flow MGD
 9.7
 0.216
 0.057
 0.288
 0.086
 0.242
   Location
Water Usage
Lake Michigan       Process
Wolf River Channel  Cooling Water
Wolf Lake
excess intake
                              C-4

-------
3.   AMERICAN OIL COMPANY
     3.1  Introduction
     The American Oil Company (AMOCO) facility in Whiting, Indiana,
is a "Class DM oil refinery which performs lube oil processing,
topping and cracking/reforming operations.  Crude oil is processed
into various products at an established capacity of 330,000
barrels/day.  Processes utilized include distillation, catalytic
reforming, hydrodesulfurization, catalytic cracking, alkylation,
treating, extraction, dewaxing, grease and lube oil production,
coking, asphalt production and sulfur recovery (EPA permit appli-
cation file 1973).
    3.2  Data Evaluation
    Water use within the facility is for both process and non-
contact cooling water amounting to a combined discharge of 128
mgd.  Outfalls are shown in Figure C-l.  Outfe11 001 is the
treated process waste stream with a flow rate of 29.17 mgd.
NPDES BOD values average 20.0 mg/£; NK3-N 5.43 mg/&; oil and
grease 4.8 mg/£ and phenols, 0.249 mg/&.  Additional parameters
are included in Table 4.2.  These values substantially agree
with ISPCB monthly operation reports for the later half of 1973.
Nitrogen values, however, are consistently 2-3 mg/£ lower than
reported on the NPDES (see Table C-2).
     Outfall 002 is noncontact cooling water with a flow of 99
mgd.  Continuous monitoring is conducted to insure stream con-
tinuity.  NPDES average effluent concentrations for various
parameters are BOD, 4 mg/s,; NHn-N 0.06 tng/&; total organic carbon,
20 nig/2,; oil and grease, 0.9 mg/£ and phenols, 0.031 mg/S-  (see
Table C-2).  ISPCB monthly operating reports  (in Table C-2)
indicate values somewhat lower for each parameter than those
listed on  the NPDES.
                               C-5

-------
o
i
                                                 Figure C-l



                                        DETAIL MAP SHOWING OUTFALLS

                                  FROM AMERICAN OIL CO. AND UNION CARBIDE

-------
                       Table C-2

   AMERICAN OIL COMPANY OUTFALL 002 DATA COMPARISON


                                  Parameters,  mg/l,
                                               PHENOL
                                   OIL
      APPLICATION
 .0
U.OG
0.03
0.9
IKPCll MONTHLY
OPHRATTMO REPORT
APRIL, 1973
ISPCT3 MOIITHLY
O^r,RA.TIMO HEPORT
f/IAY,
1.0
2.1
0.015
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.6
0.71
                            C-7

-------
     3.3  Waste Treatment
     In-plant changes to reduce the pollution load include recycle
of decoking water, the sale of spent caustic and acids,  stream
stripping of sour water and reuse of phenolic water bottoms.   The
process waste water treatment area includes 20-24 API separators
of a two-stage type with a detention time of approximately 120
min.  Process effluent from the separator goes to a gravity
settling lagoon where it flows into an aerated lagoon consisting
of four compartments in series.  The aerated lagoon effluent  is
coagulated with alum, flocculated using polyelectrolytes as
flocculating aids, followed by air flotation before release to
Lake Michigan. Sludges from primary and secondary treatment,  and
skimmings from tertiary treatment are burned in a fluidized bed
incinerator along with tank cleaning sludges and other hydrocarbon
wastes, including selective noxious refinery waste streams such
as spent caustics.  The fluidized bed incinerator was designed
and built to also dispose of the oily sludge (sulfonate  soap).
Once-through cooling water is completely segregated with its  own
collection system, gravity separator,  and outfall (EPA application
file 1973).
                               C-8

-------
4.   UNION CARBIDE
     4.1  Introduction
     There are three facilities operated by Union Carbide within
the Calumet Study Area, the Chemicals and Plastics Division in
Whiting, the Linde Air Products Division in East Chicago and the
Lakeside T-1200 Plant in Gary.  The chemicals and plastics
division has two outfalls, one to Lake Michigan and the other to
the IHC, both of which are cooling water only.  Process waste
water is pretreated and then sent to the East Chicago Sewage
Treatment Plant.  Linde Air Products Division has oaly one out-
fall to the IHC, consisting of noncontact cooling water and pro-
cess waste water.  The T-1200 plant has one outfall which has a
discharge to Lake Michigan similar in composition to the Linde
Division outfall (NPDES Applications).
     4.2  Chemicals and Plastics Division - Whiting
     At the Union Carbide facility in Whiting, refinery gases are
processed into various organic compounds.  At present, plant
processes include power production, an olefin unit, a low-density
polyethylene unit and isopropanol manufacturing.  Water use is
for cooling purposes with a small volume being diverted for
process use.  All process waste water is diverted to the East
Chicago STP.
     4.2.1  Wastewater Discharge
     A  flow of 40-50 nillion gallons/day is discharged to Lake
Michigan through outfall 001 shown in Figure C-l.  Table 4.2 in
Chapter 4 indicates effluent parameter concentrations and loadings.
     Comparisons between ISPCB monthly operating reports and
NPDES data indicate reasonable agreement.  For the month of
April 1973, however, several process line leaks were encountered
which increased the effluent concentrations to relatively high
levels.  Also, data from a ISPCB 24-hr survey conducted June 15
and 16, 1972, indicate much higher levels than those reported
                                C-9

-------
by Union Carbide.  Table C-3  for  that  sampling date  BOD  is
14 tng/8,, COD  is 26 mg/£ and oil,  4.4 mg/Ji.
     Outfall  002 represents cooling water used in  the  polyethylene
unit with a flow of 216,000 gallons/day  to  the IHC.  NPDES data
(Table 4.2) indicate  BOD and  COD  loadings in excess  of those
measured for  001.  Comparisons  in Table  C-3 show recent  ISPCB
reports with  parameter values considerably  lower than  the earlier
NPDES data.
     4.2.2  Wastewater Treatment
     Outfall  001 consists entirely of  noncontact cooling water and
receives no treatment.  The waste stream is monitored  continuously
by a total carbon analyzer to detect possible process  leakage.
Flow to outfall 002 is treated  for oil removal and retained in a
holding tank  before discharge.  Daily  samples for  BOD, COD, oil,
suspended solids and  pH are collected  and analyzed.
     4.3  Linde Air ProductsDivision, East Chicago
     This facility extracts oxygen, nitrogen and argon from air
by means of low temperature fractionating.  Power required for
the extraction is, in part, supplied by  an on-site generating
station.  Water use at this facility is  primarily confined to
noncontact cooling for compressors and condensers  (NPDES appli-
cations) .
     4.3.1  Wastewater Discharge
     There is  one outfall discharging  to the IHC.  Flow is
150,750 gallons/day.   Effluent data are  given in Table 4.2.   A
May 1973 ISPCB report agrees with values for suspended solids
but not with chromates and oil.   Chromates on NPDES are listed
as 0.27 mg/£ while ISPCB reports  indicate a constant 7,7 mg/£
value.   Oils arc nearly three times greater on ISPCB reports at
14 mg/£  average as opposed to 5  mg/£ in  the NPDES application.
Stream loading is 13  Ib/day suspended solidg,  5 Ib/day chromate s
and 8 Ib/day oil.
                              010

-------
                                             Table C-3

                     UNION CARBIDE, CHEMICAL & PLASTICS DIVISION  EFFLUENT DATA
                  COMPARISON OF NPDES DATA, OPERATING REPORTS AND EFFLUENT SURVEY
                                        Concentrations,
                             OUTFALL 001

                        BOD    COD    SS    OIL
                                            OUTFALL 002

                                               COD    SS    OIL
        NPDES DATA
6.8    13.2   2.4   1.7
                          14.5   54
11.5  0.9
O
        ISI>CB REPORT    3
        APRIL, 1973
       11
19    0
        ISPC3 RFPORT    3
        MAY,  1973
        U.S.  EPA 24-hr  14
        SURVEY
       26
2.1   4.4
        ALL DATA IN nci/1

-------
     4.3.2  Wastewater Treatment
    Oil receives the major emphasis in the treatment process.
There are a series of four ponds connected by subsurface dikes.
These allow oil to collect on the surface and suspended solids
to settle out.  Floating oil is removed by punp ing and solids
are dredged.  A rag filter is also employed between the third
and fourth ponds.  Union Carbide plans to construct an enlarged
settling basin which will allow total recycle (EPA application
file 1973).  Completion dates are unknown at present.  At that
time, the IHC outfall will handle only storm water runoff from
roof drains.
     4.3.3  T-1200 Plant - Gary
     This facility is similar to the Linde plant in processes and
water use.  There is ona outfall to Lake Michigan with a discharge
of noncontact cooling water of 100 mgd.  This waste stream
receives no treatment other than continuous chlorination to
inhibit algae growth.  Residual chlorine is reported to be 0.08
mg/£ (EPA application file 1973).
                              C-12

-------
5.   ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
     5.1  Introduction
     The Atlantic-Richfield Company owns and operates a "Class B"
crude oil refinery in East Chicago, Indiana, previously owned by
Sinclair, Inc.  Crude oil is received by pipeline and is processed
into numerous organic compounds.  Processes utilized include
fractionating, reforming, catalytic cracking, alkylation and
polymerization.  There is one submerged discharge into tha Lake
George Branch of the Indiana Harbor Canal with a flow of 4.75 mgd,
shown in Figure C-2.
     Water usage at the facility is for power generation and steam
production.  Steam is used in many process lines and becomes
contaminated with oil and ammonia products.  Noncontact cooling
water from various lines is combined with process water and treated
at the Industrial Waste Treatment Plant.  Concentrated ammonia
and sanitary wastes are sent to the East Chicago Sewage Treatment
Plant (EPA application file 1973).
     5.2  Pata Eva1uation
     Data submitted for NPDES evaluation in 1971 was updated in
July of  1973.  Effluent parameter concentrations are listed in
Table 4.2.  Values reported for ammonia-nitrogen, Kjeldahl-
nitrogen, C.O.C., cyanide, iron, and phenols are relatively high.
A report prepared by the U.S. EPA in September 1971  (EPA appli-
cation file) compares data obtained in  a 24-hr effluent survey
with the then  applicable effluent guidelines.  Several parameters
exceeded the guidelines including chlorides, sulfates, nitrates,
total phosphorus, iron, phenol, cyanide and  total dissolved
solids.  Furthermore, the NPDES application was updated as shown
in Table C-4.  This table indicates that several of  these param-
eters have increased 1971 to 1973.  The 1971 EPA report mentions
the  projected  addition of a coker,  fluid catalytic cracker,
hydro-cracker  and a crude still.  Arco  is  the only industry in
the  Calumet  area whose effluent has not improved but rather has
degraded in  quality.

                                C-13

-------
o
                                   /? TL ft A/ r / r
                                   /*', - u ,-rft £
                                        OOI
                                                                   001-
                                                                   OOl-
                                                                   003-

                                                                   09*'-
                                                   Figure C-2

                               DETAIL MAP OF  INDIANA HARBOR CANAL DISCHARGES

-------
                      Table  C-4

       ATIANTIC-RICHFIELD NPDES  DATA  COMPARISON
             PARAMETERS  SHOWING  INCREASE
                 Concentrations,  tag/A
PARAMETER                NPDES 6/25/71         NPDES  7/16/73



   BOD                        10                    14.3


   COD                       125                    1C7


   TS                        965                    978


   TSS                        15                    20.6
   NII3-N                      10                     14.3


   Cr                          0.15                   0.24
                           C-15.

-------
     5.3  Waste Treatment
     The total refinery effluent passes through oil separators
where oil is skimmed and sent back through the refinery for
processing (Figure C-3).  This waste oil is stored in two tanks.
Sludge from oil separation, tank bottoms, etc. are stored in
tanks before going to a sludge disposal area.  After process
water passes through the oil separators, it goes to an activated
sludge treatment plant.  Two activated sludge complete mix tanks,
having a capacity of 4,059,000 gallons, provide treatment before
final clarification.  These tanks provide 34 hr detention at
2,000 gpm, 27 hr at 2,500 gpm, or 19.4 hr at 3,500 gpm.  Effluent
from the aeration tanks is sent to final clarifiers.   Sludge from
the final tanks is sent back to the activated sludge mix tanks
and excess sludge goes to an aerobic sludge digestion tank,  then
to a sludge thickener.  The thickened sludge is sent to a sludge
disposal contractor and the supernatant is recycled through the
system.  Effluent from the final clarifiers is sent to a manhole,
then to a submerged outfall for discharge into the Lake George
Branch of the Indiana Harbor Canal (Figure C-2).  The total
refinery effluent is monitored (by a Beckman 9500 automatic
monitor) for flow, temperature, dissolved oxygen and total
organic carbon (EPA application file 1973).
                              016

-------
                    3 -s M 6 i>
                                   1
                            OIL.
o
                              Ot

                                                                                     7s* A460
                      r/c ~ ;e/
-------
'6.   E. I. DU PONT
     6.1  Introduction
     The E.  I. DuPont de Nemours facility is located on the Grand
Calumet River near  its junction with the Indiana Harbor Canal in
East Chicago.  See  Figure C-4.  The facility produces inorganic
industrial chemicals and operates continuously with process waste
water  and noncontact cooling water discharged to the Grand
Calumet River.  At  present, the plant  is in the process of com-
plying with  a consent decree issued November 14, 1972, resulting
from  litigation initiated by the U.S.  government.
      6.2  Discharges
      There are ten  reported discharges in the NPDES application
of March 17, 1972  (Figure C-5).  Outfall 006 has been closed
leaving nine outfalls.  This number is expected to change as
compliance with the Consent Decree is  achieved.  DuPont is
expected to  have only three outfalls by December 18, 1973.
      Effluent parameters are given in  Table 4.2, even though
these will not be representative after December 18, 1973.  Since
these data will no  longer be valid, no attempt is made to cross
check the NPDES data with ISPCB monthly operating reports.
      6.3  Proposed  Effluent Loads
      Of the  three outfalls remaining after December 18, 1973,
001 will discharge  noncontact  cooling  water with 002 and 003
discharging  treated process waste.  See Table C-5.
      6.4  Waste Treatment
      Outfall 002 will contain  waste water from the Freon manu-
 facturing area, sulfuric acid  manufacturing area, sulfamic manu-
 facturing area and  the agricultural manufacturing area,  Treatment
 for this waste stream will consist of  various collecting tanks,
a neutralization tank, a 46,000 gallon settling tank, and three
cartridge  filters.  Continuous monitoring for various parameters
                               C-18

-------
                 Figure C-4



DETAIL MAP OF GRAND CALUMET RIVER DISCHARGES

-------
                                                                           ppron AREA
o
I
to
o
                       CI:LOT»TDT:G
                                               Figure  C-5


                             E.  I.  DU PONT OUTFALLS PRIOR  TO DECEMBER 1973

-------
                           Table  C-5
                  E. I. DU PONT EFFLUENT LOADS
Beginning January 15, 1974 through October 15,  1974,  the
effluent loads will be:
   Parameter
Zn
P
Suspended solids
Chlorides
Loading,  Ib/day
        8
        4
      600
     2500
Monthly average
       12
        6
      900
     4800
After October 15, 1974, the loads will be:
Sulfates
Dissolved solids
   39,000
   74,000
   58,500
  102,000
                               C-21

-------
;will be included along with a final pH and adjustment unit.  A
 flow of 1400 gpm is expected.
     Outfall 003 will discharge wastes from the chloride and
 silicate products manufacturing area.  Treatment will consist of
 two 300,000 gallon equalization tanks, a rapid agitation coagu-
 lator, a flocculator and  thickener followed by two diatomaceous
 earth coated rotary filters.  This flow will then combine with
 another waste  stream from the Ludox area.  Combined, the waste
 flow of 600 gpm will go through two 16-ft high pressure sand
 filters and receive final pH adjustment before being discharged.
                              022

-------
7.   BETHLEHEM STEEL
     7.1  Introduction
     This facility,  located at the Burns Waterway Harbor,  is the
newest in the study  area and consequently one of the best  in
pollution control.   The plant was built during the 1960's  and
$33 million has been expended on air and water pollution abate-
ment equipment with  the results being apparent in the effluent
concentrations reported in the NPDES application.
     7.2  Data Evaluation
     The Burns Harbor plant has 163 coke ovens,  one blast  furnace
and two basic oxygen furnaces (300 tons each).  Water usage is
258.0 million gallons/day and there are two outfalls,  one  to the
Little Calumet River and the other to the Burns  Waterway Harbor.
Effluent parameter concentrations are listed in Table 4.2  with
outfall location shown in Figure C-6.
     The correlation between ISPCB monthly operating reports and
the NPDES application for BOD and suspended solids is very good.
Data for all other  information contained on the NPDES cannot be
confirmed since they are not included in the ISPCB monthly reports,
     7.3  Waste Treatment
     For the coke plant, blast furnace and EOF shop, waste water
is given physical-chemical treatment, cooled and then recirculated.
Finishing mill waste goes to the main treatment plant where
primary treatment removes oil and large particulates.   Secondary
treatment is physical-chemical with a flocculator and clarifier
to remove additional wastes.  The effluent from the clarifier
passes to a finishing lagoon which is aerated (NPDES Application
File).
                              C-23

-------
o
i
                                                        Ctfftf
                                               Figure C-6


                                  DETAIL MAP OF BURNS DITCH DISCHARGES

-------
8.   MIDWEST STEEL - PORTAGE
     8.1  Introduction
     Midwest Steel is a division of National Steel Co., which is
the fourth largest steel producer in the nation.  The Midwest
facility in Portage, Indiana, is a finishing mill only and does
not conduct coke, blast furnace or basic oxygen operations.  Cold
reduction, sheet tempering, annealing and plating operations are
performed.
     There are six outfalls from Midwest into Burns Ditch.  See
Figure C-6.  For five of these, NPDES applications have been
submitted.  Outfall 006 is a discharge from a privately owned
sewage treatment plant and has no NPDES application.
     8.2  Data Evaluation
     Outfalls 001, 002, 003, 005 are all noncontact cooling water
from air compressors and oil coolers.  Storm water run-off from
roof drains is also included in these outfalls.  Effluent flows,
concentrations and loads are given in Table 4.2.
     Outfall 004 represents the discharge from the Industrial
Waste Water Treatment Plant.  Wastes from the continuous pickle
line, cold reduction mill, cleaning line, sheet tempering,
annealing, plating preparation, electroplating, hot dip zinc
coating lines and boiler blow-down lines are channeled into the
industrial treatment plant where physical-chemical treatment
occurs.
     Comparisons given in Table C-5 between NPDES and ISPCB data
indicate close correlation for those parameters listed.
     Data  for outfall 006 are available only from ISPCB monthly
operating  reports and EPA 24-hr surveys (Table C-6).  Average
flow is approximately 10,000 gpd with BOD and suspended solids
values very low  at 2 and 7 mg/& , respectively.  Discharge is to
Burns Ditch.  No NHo-N values were given for this outfall.
                              C-25

-------
                                     Table  C-6

                            MIDWEST STEEL EFFLUENT DATA
            COMPARISON OF NPDES WITH MONTHLY  OPERATING REPORTS TO ISPCB
                                AND U.S. EPA  SURVEY
                   Concentrations, m^/£ except  for turbidity,  JTD
OUTFALL
14PDES
IGPCB REPORT
APRIL, 1973
                                            Flow  9.06 mgd
BOD TUKIilDTTY
3.1 2J
3.7 25
CIJLFATr
375
434
CYA'Jini:
0.05
0.10
CJIP.OMIUN
0.03
0.02
IRON OIL
0.5 2.0
0.3 3.0
o
N3
IS PC P. REPORT
MAY, lb)73
3.2
o.n
0.04
0.5
                                                                  1.9
 OUTFALL 006
                                                   TLO17  700 CPD
Concentrations, mg/jfc
!;OD FUSPENDTD SOLIDS
PJ^P. CHLORIME
U.S. EPA 24hr
SURVEY
                     20
 ISPCB  REPOR1
 APRIL,  1973
        1.2
        0.17
 ISPCB  DEPORT
 MAY, 1973
                       7.7
                                                         0.14

-------
     8.3  Waste Treatment
     Midwest's facility,  being constructed in the 1960's, was
able to incorporate some  of the latest technology available for
pollution control.
                             C-27

-------
9.   INLAND STEEL COMPANY
     9.1  Introduction
     The Inland Steel facility in East Chicago, Indiana, is one
of the largest steel mills in the country producing 5.3% of the
nation's total steel output.  There are 523 coke ovens, 19 open
hearth furnaces (12 of which are due to close), 2 basic oxygen and
2 electric furnaces.  Water use is 1,008   mgd, discharged through
15 outfalls shown in Figure C-7.  Processes utilizing water
include coke quenching, coke processing, ironmaking, steelmaking,
sintering and hot and cold rolling (Council on Economic Priori-
ties 1973).
     9.2  Data Evaluation
     Of the 18 outfalls included in the NPDES application, three
008, 009, and 010, have been discontinued.  See Table C-7.  The
remaining outfalls and their effluent parameter concentrations
are listed in Tables 4.2 and C-8.  The concentrations reported
in 1971 reflect the completion of an extensive waste water treat-
ment program at Inland.  Since late 1970, no major additional
treatment has been placed on line.
     A comparison between NPDES data and a recent 24-hr survey
conducted by the Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board is given
in Table C-9.  Data obtained during the survey agrees closely
with that submitted in the NPDES application.  The only exceptions
are           the values for total iron.  These values fluctuate
widely, being either substantially more or less than NPDES
values.
     Comparison with ISPCB monthly operating reports in Table C-10
again show fluctuations in iron values with relatively stable
values for other parameters.  The ISPCB monthly operating reports
for April and May of 1973 (Table C-10) indicate a high degree of
dependence upon intake water loading conditions in determining
the total effluent quality.
                              C-28

-------
                              .5
        Ml CL
O

I

hO
             /*!(.<-
                      .»«•>*
                      Oi o O
                      olo o
                                  t t
                              •n V V,

                              § § 8
                               COKC


                               />/?n t


'"•6 ] 009 y

c
1ST" fUKtJAt.es

Oil _»
-
>
/"^
./
jr






                                                         0/2.
y^T


V  *
o  o
                                                         of>£u uterus.
                                               Figure  C-7



                 DETAIL  MAP SHOWING OUTFALLS FROM  INLAND AND YOUNGSTOWN  STEEL COS

-------
                                          Table C-7


                             INLAND STEEL COMPANY OUTFALL SUMMARY

                                   Source: NPDES APPLICATION
n
i
Outfall number

NPDES
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
Oil
012
013
014
015
016
017
018
New proposed
outfalls

ISPCB
01E-2
4E-1
5E-1
5E-2
5E-3
6E-1
7E-1

13F-1
13F-2
13G-1
13H-1
14H-1
15H-1
16H-1
16H-2
16H-3
16F-1
24K-1
24N-1
Flow,
mgd
0.144
190
7.225
0.864
8.64
0.648
21.6
-
-
-
158.7
84.6
106.9
106.9
21.6
12.9
144
149.7
0.14
50.4

Average pH
8.2
7.9
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.3
7.5
-
-
-
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.2





Average temperature

Winter
34
45
45
46
59
46
55
-
-
-
48
56
45
45
54






Summer
68
80
77
80
93
80
89
-
-
-
82
90
79
79
88






-------
       Inland Steel

       IS 070  0X3
                  Table C-8


INLAND STEEL COMPANY EFFLUENT CCHCENTBATIONS

       Application Date: June 22,  1971
            Dg/t, except *  -  uf/4
O
 I


003
005




014
014>



106 2 11
110 14 »




107 9 24
111 2 12

« a B 8 a 3 ii | ., 1 a

227 207 23 13 .19 83 16 .01 15 7 146
173 145 25 34 0.23 0.58 0.25 0.02 20 14 148




188 175 19 15 1 . 23 3. 44 . 3* . 01 36 19 149
200 187 19 30 .23 . 45 1 . 1£ . 11 9 10 145

1

25
26




30
25

3 SUICIDE
* CHLORIDE

0.0 41
0.1 11




0.1 25
.1 14
0 11
HIM

0 .13 - 0 4
0 0-06




.12 .08 - 0 9
0 14 0 2
0 .16 - O 3
1 1 | « .m

0 - 0 25 24S9
0 - 1 47 2175




0 - 1 12 3800
0 - 0 18 190
0 43.6 4 15 1800
*
I

20
86




IB
0
65
1 >. - 1
| | 1 | | fi .JJ

O 1O 2.1O 16 O 2O
- O 14 l.S 5 0 35




- 0 2O 2.0 6 O 29
0 5 2.2 9 0 14

S
1
o

9
18




5
4

§
1

O
O




13
0


-------

OUTFALL!
SOURCE
BOD
TR
MII-:I
TOT. P
TOT. To
OIL
PHFHOL*

BOD
TS
.<::.-:,
TOT . P
TOT Fe
OIL
I'IT;:I.OL*
OUTFALL i-
sourer.
P.OD
TS
NH3-:i
TOT. P
TOT . FG
OIL
PHENOL*
INLAND STEEL MrVLUQU CONCENTRATIONS
COMPARISON OF NPDES AND ISPCB 24-HR SAMPLES JULY 11, 1973
Parameters in mg/jt except * • ug/jt
001 002 003 004 005
NPDES ISPCB NPDES ISPCB NPDES ISPCB NPDES ISPCB NPDES IS»
3.0 3.3 2.0 1.0 . 2.U 1.8 2.0 1.5 14.0 1.8
308 32C 158 180 227 270 176 2BO 173 220
.12 .3 .59 .3 .19 .1 .17 .1 .23 .13
.3 1.2 .03 .04 .1 .1 .01 .04 .02 .06
1.2 1.0 .23 .4 2.5 1.1 1.8 6.5 2.2 0.8
7 -2 -9 - 9 - 18 -
0 -8 -o-O-O-
007 Oil 012 013 014
1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.6 9.0 2.3 9.0 1.8
150 11,0 159 190 253 330 224 210 188 210
.17 .3 .18 .2 3.42 .4 1.41 .2 1.23 .2
.01 .03 .01 .06 .01 .03 .01 .03 .01 .03
.7 .6 ,2 .5 .3 .3 4.0 2.6 3.8 2.2
3-2 -2-5- 5 -
33-8 - 100 - 192 - 191
815 016 017 018
;]rors ISPCH IIPDEG inncn NPDKS ispcn NPDES ISPCB
2.0 2.1 2.0 2.2 4.0 3,5 2.0 1.9
175 231) 200 190 189 200 214 210
.14 .1 .23 ,2 .17 .1 ,15 .2
.05 .15 .11 ,30 .01 .03 .03 .05
.2 .3 .2 .5 .7 .3 1,8 .8
7- 4 - 4 - ' 2
0-0-0-0
C-32

-------
                Table C-10

INLAND STEEL HONTHLY OPERATING REPORT DATA
          APRIL, 1973 MAY, 1973
  Concentrations in mg/z except * = ug/i





0
w
u>





OUTFALL 001
MONTH APR MAY
BOD
COD
PHENOL* 15 9
CYANIDE
OIL 3 3

SS 25 15
SULFATE
NH3-N
TOT. Fe
CHLORIDE
002 003 004 005 OOr, Ou7
APR MAY APR MAY APR MAY APR "AY B^P, MAY APS MV




2 3 9 5 12 5 18 17 11

27 11 29 10 30 21 34 la 30 11
33 27
.78 .58

16 16 57 11
I'll 012 Oil
APR -!AY APR ".AY APR
7 '
20
42
.04
1 ] 2 2 3

30 1-1 25 17 35
11
.81
1.7
17

"AY
6
20
3G
.03
4

2f,
?7
.G5
4.1
]Q
01"
APR
8
22
56
.04
4

27
32
.-il
2.5
19
016*
MAY APR 'IAY
6
18
34
.03
4 1 '

17 12
28
.03
2.G
IB
017 018
APR '1AY APR !*AY




35 11

28 21 21 15





-------
     9.3  Waste Treatment
     The last major program for wastewater treatment ended in
1970 with the completion of a $10 million "terminal treatment
plant" which consolidated the flow from six outfalls.  This
treatment facility receives effluents from numerous finishing
operations, the sinter plant and the open hearth shop.  Treatment
consists of primary settling basins, oil skimmers and a 1000-ft
terminal settling basin (Figure C-8).
     Other waste streams receiving treatment as part of this
most recent phase include the 80-in. cold strip mill, blast
furnace waste, electric furnace and biller caster shops.  Waste
from the basic oxygen furnace and the 12-in. merchant bar mill
are treated and recirculated.  Acid pickle liquor is now being
discharged into a deep well (4300 ft) at a rate of 164,000 gpd.
     Prior to 1965, many additional plant processes received
treatment systems.  What remains now are fifteen active dis-
charges with total net parameter loads shown in Figure 4.2.
Although individual effluent streams may not contain excessive
amounts of pollutants, the total volume of water discharged
daily (1008.9 mgd) indicates a large pound loading of pollutants
reaching Lake Michigan.  Phenols average 440 Ib/day and NHo-N
average 5536 Ib/day.
     A citizen complaint against Inland filed before the Stream
Pollution Control Board has resulted in an eight-point program
of pollution control.   Plans include additional treatment for
outfalls 003,  004 and 005,  plant #2 and #3 blast furnace wastes,
and acid pickle liquor line improvements.   Further action and
approval by the Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board is
expected.  In addition, an Illinois lawsuit (People of the State
of Illinois vs Inland Steel Co. 1974) has resulted in a finding
that Inland Steel Co. is polluting Illinois waters of Lake
Michigan, and the parties havfe been ordered to negotiate
corrective action.
                              C-34

-------
                                                Figure C-8

                             INLAND STEEL COMPANY TERMINAL WASTE TREATMENT
      Process
      water
i
OJ
Ln
        Process
        water
SCALP IIIG
  TAJIK
                       OIL CONG.
SCALPING
  TAIIK
                      OIL CCT7C.
                         TAIIK
1,000' TEPJ1INAL SETTLING
             BASIN
1,000' TERMINAL SETTLING
             BASIN
   OUTFALL 013
-*- OUTFALL  014

-------
10.  YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE C'O., EAST CHICAGO
     10.1  General Description
     The Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. Indiana Harbor Works is
an integrated steel producing facility located adjacent to the
Indiana Harbor Canal and Lake Michigan in East Chicago, Indiana.
This facility includes coke ovens, blast furnaces,  open hearth
and EOF processes, primary and secondary mills for the production
of sheet, galvanized tin, bar, plate and tube products.  In 1971,
7906 tons of steel were produced daily.  Water discharges from
cooling and process lines total 291    mgd from 11 outfalls
(Council on Economic Priorities 1973).
     10.2  Data Evaluation
     There are 11 outfalls which discharge directly to the IHC.
The discharges are shown in Figure C-7.  Flow from these outfalls
averaged 291.67 mgd at the time of filing the NPDES permit in
June 1971.  Present flow and process line information is pro-
vided in Table C-ll.  Most existing treatment facilities were
completed by late 1970.  Permit data in Tables 4.2 and C-12
should therefore be an accurate portrayal of existing conditions.
     Data comparisons between NPDES, ISPCB 24-hr surveys and
monthly operating reports are of limited value since all param-
eters for all outfalls are not given.  Available data are com-
pared in Table C-13.
     The most dramatic differences occur between reported values
on the NPDES and those values obtained in a 24-hr composite
sampling conducted by the Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board
on June 13 and 14, 1972.  These data indicate  values in excess
of those reported in the NPDES for suspended solids, iron, and
phosphorus.  Iron content was exceptionally high for outfalls
004 and 005 with values of 90 and 45 mg/H, respectively.
                               C-36

-------
                          Table  C-ll
               YOUNGSTOWN SHEET  & TUBE  COMPANY
       NPDES AND ISPCB OUTFALL IDENTIFICATION AND FLOWS


                         JULY  1973

NPDES
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
OUTFALLS
ISPCB
20
2
4
8
11
12
13
22
14
15

FLOW-MGD
15.2
2.0
.07S
1.233
2.24
6.2G
14.6
9.53
50.9

Oil
ISA
65.0
                                                 PROCESS LINE

                                              Central Waste
                                                Treatment Plant

                                              Cold Reduced
                                                Sheet Mill
irl Tin Hill

#1 Tin Mill

#1 Tin Mill

Coke Plant

Coke Plant

Coke Plant

Sinter Plant

Blast Furnace
  Cooling Uater

Sinter Plant
                              C-37

-------
     Monthly operating reports submitted by the company have
little information for some outfalls and none for others.  An
accurate and reliable picture of present effluent discharges is
difficult to assess for the parameters of suspended solids, iron,
and phosphorus.  Ammonia nitrogen, phenols and oil values appear
to be consistent between NPDES and monthly operating reports data.
     10.3  Waste Treatment
     Process water from the cold reduced sheet and tin mills is
routed through the Central Waste Treatment Plant (CWTP) consisting
of primary mixing tanks, scalping tanks, secondary mixing tanks,
final clarifiers and sludge thickeners.  The primary purpose is
to remove oil and solids in the waste stream.  At present there
is an emergency by-pass around the CWTP which would discharge
untreated wastes into the IHC.  After treatment the values (in
Table C-13) for iron, oil and suspended solids are still high.
They are 5, 8 and 40 tng/Jl, respectively.  Youngs town monitors
this effluent daily but does not analyze for phenols, iron, and
ammonia nitrogen.  After treatment, the effluent is combined
with noncontact cooling water from the temper mill of the No. 2
tin mill, and discharged through outfall 001.
     Flow of 3.62 mgd of once-through noncontact cooling waters
from the No. 2 cold reduced sheet mill is discharged without
treatment through outfall 002.  Outfalls 003, 004, and 005 are
all storm water and noncontact cooling water from electrolytic
cooling, forming and pickling line discharges and receive no
treatment.  Again, these are not monitored.
                              C-38

-------
      Youngstown  Steel and Tube  Company
      IN  070  0X3  2  720319
                                                                       Table C-12

                                                          YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND  TUBE COMPANY
                                                            Application Date: July 1, 1971
                                                                EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS
                                                                  mg/i except *  =   g/i
      OUTFALL*
                       §
                                                                         1
                                                                                         I
U)
V0
001        93   5.5    82   614   596


002       112   1.5     8   199   194


003       114   1.8    12   200   193


004       110   5.4     8   219   205


005        62   2.6     4   282   244


006       132  10.4    85   228   213


007       108   3.1    36   217   202


008       110  27.8    53   218   198


009       106   3.4    12   216   200


010      J.10   3.5    24   227   199  107


0X1       132   1-6     8   310   283
40
19
17
22
26
19
20
22
22
.07
22
8
3
4
6
11
4
12
10
5
9
7
2
2
2
2
3
31
2
4
2
2
3
2
4
3
3
3
7
3
3
4
3
3
.24
.24
.24
.23
.34
.24
.24
.23
.26
.25
.19
. 009 65
.016
.024
. 022 88
.006 125
.048
.028
.031 45
.052
.041
.028 22
-
5
9
13
39
4
6
6
5
7
17
235 620

167 16.4
290
170 37
30
14
13.7


235 21.8
.01 .76 5000

28 .58
5750
9700
112 28.8
37 .04
29


21 .17 .75 8550
                                                                                                                                           19
                                                                                                                             3.75


                                                                                                                             10.50
                                                                                                                                                  2.5
                                                                                                                                      13
                                                                                                                                           22
     8


     12


    113


     10


     11


     14


     8


     14




    6.4


13   10
                                                                                                                                                                   2090


                                                                                                                                                                    303


                                                                                                                                                                    290
                                                                                                                                                                     11

-------
                                                                 Table C-13
                                                YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE EFFLUENT DATA, mg/4

                                   COMPARISON OF NPDES, MONTHLY OPERATING REPORTS AND EFFLUENT SURVEYS
o
 I



Monthly
ISPCB operating
Parameter,
mq/t

Chloride
Sulfate
Ammonia-Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Iron
Oil and grease
Phenols
Suspended solids

Chloride .
Sulfate
Ammonia-Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Iron
Oil and grease
Phenols
Suspended solids

Chloride
Sulfate
Ammonia-Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Iron
Oil and grease
Phenols
Suspended solids

NPDES

_
62.0
2.0
0.009
5.0
8.0
_
40.0

28.0 .
16.4
2.0
0.024
_
1.13.0
_
17.0

_
37.0
3.0
0.006
9.70
11.0
26.0
24-hr survey
report
6/13/72 March 1973
Outfall
_
_
1.0
0.3
2.1
4.0
0.01
15.0
Outfall
_
_
-
-
_
-
_
—
Outfall

2.6
0.4
45.0
6.9
0.004
13.0
001
_
_
-
_
-
5.0
_
12.0
003
_
_
-
-
-
-
-
—
005

-
-
Monthly
operating
report
April 1973 NPDE5

_ _.
_
2.0
0.016
-
4.0 12.0
- -
11.0 19.0

_ _
290.0
2.0
0.022
5.750
10.0
— -
22.0

112.0
30.0
31.0
0.048
14.0
2.09
19.0

Monthly
IS?CB operating
24-hr survey
report
6/13/72 March 1973
Outfall
_
-
0.8
0.6
1.3
3.1
0.001
97.0
Outfall
_
-
1.1
0.4
90.0
4.8
0.001
270.00
Outfall
-
9.0
0.4
1Q
.a
3.6
1.72
100.0
002
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
004
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
"
006
-
15.0
12.0
1.63
42.0
Monthly
operating
report
Aoril 1973


-
-
-
-
-
—
—

_
-
-
—
-
-
—


-
5.0
5.0
1.10
4.0

-------
                                                         Table C-13 (cont.)
O
I
Parameter,
mq/l
UPOES
Monthly
ISPCB operating
24-hr survey report
6/13/73 March 1973
Oatfall 007
Chloride
Sulfate
Ammonia-Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Iron
Oil and grease
Phenols
Suspended solids

Chloride
Sulfate
Ammonia-Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Iron
Oil and grease
Phenols
Suspended solids

Chloride
Sulfate
Ammonia-Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Iron
Oil and grease
Phenols
Suspended solids
37.0
14.0
2.0
0.028
_
8.0
0.303
20.0

_
_
2.0 .
0.052
—
-
_
22.0

21.0
21.8
3.0
0.028
8.550
10.0
11.0
22.0
_
-
-
-
_
3.4
_
3.0
Outfall
_
_
-
-
-
2.8
0.003
72.0
Outfall
_
-
2.2
0.2
2.8
2.4
0.072
13.0
_
-
-
-
_
-
_
-
009
_
_
-
-
-
-
_
5.0
Oil
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Monthly
operating
report
Apjril 1973 NPDES

29.0
13.7
4.0
0.031
_ _
14.0
0.29
22.0

_. _
_ _
2.0
0.041
- -
6.4
_ _
0 107.0

_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Monthly Monthly
ISPCB operating operating
24-hr survey report report
6/13/73 March 1973 April 1973
Outfall 008
_
_
_ _
— _ _
_ _ _
14.0 6.0
.: _
15.0 0
Outfall 010
_
_ • _ _
_ _ _
_ _
_ _ _
4.5
0.017
85.0 17.0 13.0










-------
     Outfalls 003, 004 and 005 convey untreated cooling water
and storm water from the No. 1 tin mill including the electro-
lytic cooling, forming and pickling lines.  Process wastes from
these lines are diverted to the CWTP.  Although this stream is
designated as noncontact cooling water, reported effluent values
are very high for iron, phenols and oil (see Table C-12) indi-
cating some contamination.  Outfalls 006,  007, and 008 are
represented as once-through noncontact cooling waters from the
ammonia processing and light oil areas of the coke plant;
however,     outfall 006 has 31 mg/£ of NH3-N, 14 mg/jt of oil
and grease, and 2.09 mg/£ of phenols.  Outfalls 007 and 008 have
values of 8 and 14 mg/l of oil and grease.  Monthly reporting
for 006 includes NHo-N phenols and oil, while no reporting is
done for 007.  Outfall 008 receives only oil and grease and
suspended solids monitoring.
     Condenser cooling water from the on-site power station is
discharged without treatment through outfall 009.  There is an
emergency connection between 009 and 010 which Youngstown reports
as normally closed.  Flow is normally 64.46 mgd.
     Outfall 010 discharges once-through noncontajt cooling water
from No. 1-4 blast furnaces and heated waste waters from the
No. 2 continuous buttweld mill.  Also on this line is the emer-
gency overflow /"from the blast furnace gas cleaning plant.
Effluent from the No. 2 continuous buttweld mill is treated in a
scale pit to remove oil and solids.  Table C-12 for 010 indicates
very high suspended solids, 107 mg/jK and relatively high oil,
6.4 mg/j£.  Monthly operating reports include only one parameter,
suspended solids, which are based on one 24-hr composite sample/
month.
                                C-42

-------
     Outfall 001 receives treated effluent from various mills at
Youngstown including the No. 1 continuous buttweld mill, billet
mill, No. 1 and 2 blooming mills, seamless mill, and the 10-in.
and 18-in. merchant mills.  All waste lines receive individual
treatment from scale pit for oil and solids removal.  The flow
from six scale pits is then channelled to the Main Scale Pit for
further oil recovery.  Here noncontact cooling water from the
No. 2 open hearth, EOF mill water, primary treated wastes from
the seamless mill and boiler house are added to the flow.  After
treatment at the main scale pit, the effluent then passes to the
terminal lagoon for final oil and sludge removal.  This treated
effluent then is mixed with 6700 gpm untreated mold cooling water
from the EOF.  An emergency overflow line exists which will
by-pass the No. 2 open hearth gas cleaning treatment system
directly to the Main Scale Pit.  Reported values for oil, phenols
and  iron indicate inadequate treatment (Table C-12).
     In all cases, except for 001, monthly reports are based on
one  24-hr composite sample.  Source of much flow, treatment,
outfall data is Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Drawing No. 569849
5/11/72  (U.S. EPA Application file).
     10.4  Unreported Discharges
     There are  four discharges  to a lagoon within the breakwater
for  which no NPDES application  for permit is on  file.   These
four discharge  118 mgd  into a lagoon which is open  to Lake
Michigan by a 200-ft opening  in the breakwater  (U.S. EPA NPDES
application file).  Youngstown  alleges that intake  from the
lagoon exceeds  the 118  mgd  and,  therefore, that  flow is  always
from the lake,  in effect, causing recirculation.
     Pickle  liquor  is  stored  in a lagoon onsite and removed  by
an outside  contractor  for disposal.
                               C-43

-------
1-1.  U.S. STEEL - GARY
     11.1  Introduction
     U.S. Steel's Gary Works is one of the largest steel mills
in the country.  There are 829 coke ovens, 12 blast furnaces,
5 sinter plants, and 6 basic oxygen furnaces (3 are under con-
struction).  It is a completely integrated mill with all aspects
of steel manufacturing represented.

     At  the  Gary works,  there  are  ancillary  divisions  for  specific
 product manufacturing.   These are National  Tube Works,  American
 Bridge  Division and  Universal Atlas Cement  Division  (NPDES  appli-
 cation  file).

     11.2  General Description - Water Discharges
     There are  39 individual outfalls at the Gary Works for which
NPDES permits have been  requested.  These are shown in Figure C-9
and  listed in Table C-14.  Five of these ourfalls discharge to
Lake Michigan and the remaining 34 discharge to the Grand Calumet
River, which drains into the Indiana Harbor Canal and therefore
to Lake Michigan.  Total discharge flow from the Gary Works is
804 mgd.  Of this, 552.5 mgd is discharged to the Grand Calumet
River through 34 outfalls and 251.5 mgd to Lake Michigan through
5 outfalls.  These 34 outfalls from U.S. Steel constitute nearly
the entire flow of the Grand Calumet River at 552.5 mgd or
913.4 cfm.
     The NPDES application, revised in 1972, indicates 15 Grand
Calumet outfalls for which no flow and parameter data is given.
Of these 15, two, 005 and 014, have been permanently discon-
tinued.  Outfalls 013, 024 and 025 are storm water overflow
sewers.  A recent U.S. Steel  flow drawing GW-202752  (NPDES
application) indicates that two outfalls which previously had no
flows now are operational.  These two are Oil and 038 with  flows
of 3.5 mgd and 10.4 mgd, respectively.
                               C-44

-------
                                LAKE M/CM/6 AM
o

*>
Ol
                                                 Figure C-9
                        DETAIL MAP SHOWING OUTFALLS OF GARY WORKS,  U.S. STEEL CORP.

                                        Legend is on following page

-------
                           Figure C-9

                     U.S. STEEL - GARY WORKS

NPDES
002
007
009
010
Oil
015
017
013
019
020
021
022
020
029
030
031
032
033
034
035'
03G
037
osa
039
OUTFALL
inrcB
GW-l
GW-2
GW-2A
GW-1
CW-3A
GW-4
GW-S
GU-G
Gw-7
TI-77>
ry T_O
GVJ-10
GU-10A
GIT- 11
H'-llA
G'.;-12
GW-l 3
ST-l*
ST-17
GU-L1
CW-LlA
ST-L5
ST-L2
ST-1,6
LEGEND
FLOW MOD
27.3
16.4
5.7
4.7
3.5
1.3
G4.5
31.C
5.7
109.7
25.2
no FLOW
42.3
::o FLOH
71. G
NO FLO!.'
7.7
3.1
26. 8
7G.3
23.2
7.0
10.4
71.3

TTEATf'IFNT *
P W/T
P-1TT
P W/T
P-NT
P VJ/T
P-NT
P W/T
H-C
:i-c
TJ-C
P-NT

P W/T

P t-7/T

'I-C
P-IIT
P V7/T
N-C
N-C
N-C
1J-C
P W/T
*  p = process waste
 W/T = waste treatment
  NT - no treatment
 N-C = noncontapt cooling water
                                 C-46

-------
OUOTALL *






001


002


003


004


OOS


006


007


008


009


010


Oil


012


013


014


015


016


017


018


019


020


021


022


P23


024


025


026


027


028


029


030


031


032


03)


034


035


036


037


038


039
                                              T»ble OH

                               U.S. STEEL GARY WORKS OUTFALL SUMMARY
                                      Source: NPDES Application
 FLOW(HOD)
1.8
.32
.01


42.3
                             71.3
                             AVERAGE PH
                            7.9
                             7.7
7.7


7.9
                             7.6
                                                         7.2
                                                          AVERAGE TEMPERATURE


                                                            WINTER - SUMMER
27.3
.005
.029
.004
16.4
5.7
4.7'
7.7
7.7
8.0
7.9
7.9
'•2
7.6
61
48
-
49
61
57
59
82
68
77
70
86
79
95
                                                                     81
64.5
31,8
5.7
109.7
25.2
7.1
7.5
7.9
7.4
7.1
63
50
59
54
_
88
75
75
93
75
7.7
3.1
26.8
76,8
28.2
7.0
7.2
6.7
7.5
7.6
7.8
7.7
57
61
59
54
55
54
68
73
75
75
84
72
                                                C-47

-------
     There are three categories of active outfalls at the Gary
Works, noncontact cooling water, process water without treatment
and process water with treatment.  The first, noncontact cooling
accounts for 264.1 mgd of flow.  Outfalls in this category are
018, 019, 032 and 039 which discharge to the Grand Calumet River.
Outfalls 35-38 also are noncontact cooling but discharge to Lake
Michigan (NPDES application).
     Process water which receives no treatment totals 88 mgd, all
of which enters the Grand Calumet River.  These outfalls include
007, 010, 015, 020, 021, and 033.  Wastes from the coke plant,
the basic oxygen furnaces, continuous casting line, open hearth
furnaces, the No. 3 sinter plant and the atmospheric gas plant
are discharged from these lines.
     The remaining outfalls 002, 009, Oil, 017, 028, 030, 034, and
039 discharge 298.6 mgd of treated waste waters.  Wastes from
the Gary Tube Works amounting to 27.3 mgd are discharged through
outfall 002.  Blast furnace waste water amounting to 70.2 mgd
are treated and discharged through outfalls 009, Oil and 017.
     Wastes from the bar, slab, blooming and 160/210 plate mills
are treated and discharged through outfalls 028 and 030.  These
discharges average 103 mgd.
     Wastes from operations conducted at the 80-in. and 84-in.
hot strip mills are treated at the terminal treatment plant and
discharged through outfall 034 with a flow of 26.8 mgd.  Separate
waste and treatment lines exist for specific operations of the
80-in. and 84-in. hot strip mills.        Wastes averaging
71.3 mgd receive treatment and are discharged from outfall 039.
     11.3  Parameter Evaluation
     Table C-15 gives the effluent parameter data for all 39
outfalls.  These data were originally submitted July 1, 1971.
Since then, U.S. Steel has updated their information twice.
The values in Table C-15 should therefore indicate present
                              C-48

-------
U. I.  lt««l
tt»  372 - 0608
0*ry
                                                               TabU  C-15

                                                 U.S.  STEEL EFFUJEWT  CONCENTRATIONS
                                                   Application Data:  July  1,  1971
                                                Conctntwtloni, mg/i  axeapt  x - ug/l
 001*

 002

 003

 004

 005*

 006

 007

 008 *

 009

 010

 Oil *


 012*

 013*

 014*

 015

 016*

 017

 oia

 019

 020

 021

 022*

  023

  024*

  025-

  026*

  027

  026

  029*
 105   «.'    29   233   221    12   111    0.2    .9  .16     *     4     3    20.S   148   28   .3     10

  94   1.1    12   159   111     2    46     .7    .9   -     07     3     1     1.7   122   21   .2     12

  96  11.4   200   790    61   218   197    1.2   2.0   .5    .1    54     S      12   131   47   .2     15
 103     .9    53   218   1M    34    71      .2    .4   .2   .03     5     1       3   123   24

 10l   5.8    22   l&l   172     9    87      .7   2.6  .58   .01     5     2    14.5    76   31
                                                                                                       1900    2.5   3.8   20    770  3

                                                                                                        300      8     2         160  2

                                                                                                        800      6   1.8          80  11




                                                                                                        800    4.0   1.6   -      50  5     -

                                                                                                       1300      9   1.9   -     590  1     32
      4.9    18   326   291    35    44     5.6   6.6  0.4    06     9    20     -    174   40   .4     26     .IS  1.5    20°   280°    18'4
                                                                                                                                                   25°   3     2°
       40     4   239   202    37   127     2.0   2.7.38   Ol
                                                                      6      36   158   36    .3     14
                                                                                                                           3300     2.8  7.5   20   100   -     18'
      12.6   29   182   174   8
                                                                            8.3   137   25
                                                                                                                            1100   2.3   3.5
154    8.9   33   257   231  26

2)3    7.0   J6   184   178   €

226    6.8    4   182   175   7

187      10   36   190   179  11

215    2.5   50   224   214  10
                             7,9  ,47    .03

                              .3  1.0    .05

                              .3   .3    .02

                              .8   .2    .03

                              .7   .1    .03
55   10

 5
6.5

4.0

2.3
163   38

138   27

138   29
           2.0   137

           2.2
                       24
8800  14.8   5.7

 200   4.8   3.2

 200   3.5   8.8

1300   2.2   3.8

1500
 120   1.1

 151    .3
175   174

223   204
           2.9   141

           1.5   151
                                               100    1.9   2.8

                                               5800   4.5   2.8
  031*

  032

  033


  034

  035

  036

  037

  038*

  039
                                                                                                                                      2700   3.1   2.2
 104   0.4    12    200   19S    5    60

 103   1,3    20    364    368   1&   67

  78   6.2    43   474   458  16   165


 115   0,7    *9   156   l53   3    32

 115   2,8    H   16a   l58  10    28

 11C   0,7    19   165   l59   6    33



  97     7    23   226   205  21    59
                             .6

                            0.3
                                        .02

                                        .02
       4     1.0   596

       53    3.0   592

      9     7.5   572




                  596

      I     -     580
                                                                      135   .3

                                                                      139  .4
                                               400    1.9   3.4

                                               2600   3.5   9.1


                                                 900   8.0   18.2

                                                      2.1    3.0

                                                 100   1.9    3.4

                                                 1100 3.7    2.7
                                                                                 C-49

-------
 conditions  at  each  outfall, as reported by U.S. Steel.  Effluent
 loads  from  Combinatorics  (1974) are given in Chapters 13 through
 18.
      Inconsistencies  are  apparent when the NPDES application data
 are  compared with data  from other sources.  U.S. EPA and Indiana
 Stream Pollution Control  Board 24-hr analyses were used in the
 comparison  and selected data are given in Table C-16.  Most
 importantly, two outfalls Oil and 038, listed by U.S. Steel as
 inactive, are  now operational.  This is confirmed by both EPA
 and  ISPCB analyses  and  U.S. Steel drawing No. GW-202752 previously
 referred  to above.  No  data have been submitted to EPA for these
 outfalls.
     Effluent  parameter data comparisons given in Table C-17
 indicate  some  other inconsistencies with reported values.  Outfall
 002  has substantially higher NHo-N values in recent surveys than
 in the NPDES application.  Outfall 007 has one sample with param-
 eter concentrations several times greater than reported for NPDES.
 Outfall 009 is  substantially higher for phenols and oil while
 outfall 010 shows a general reduction for most values.  Outfalls
 015  and 018 are consistent but NHo-N for 017 is much higher along
 with phenols and oil.   Consistent values occur for 019, 020, 021,
 028, 030, 032,  035, 036, 037, and 039.  U.S. EPA and ISPCB 24-hr
 analyses show  increases in some parameters for 033 and 034.
     11.4  Waste Treatment Facilities
     Wastes from the Gary Tube Works are given primary treatment
 in a scale pit and then combined with untreated coke plant wastes
 for  direct discharge through outfall 002 into the Grand Calumet
River.  Average flow per day is 27.3 mgd.
     Blast furnace gas wash waste water is collected in scalper
clarifiers.   Overflow from the scalper pits is diverted directly
to outfalls  009 and Oil.  Undiverted wastes continue from the
scalpers to  two settling basins.   After treatment,  wastes are
channeled to five flue dust pits  and from there to outfall 017.
Flow from these lines averages 94.4 mgd.

                              C-50

-------
PARAMETER
                              Table C-16

                  U.S.  STEEL GARY WORKS  EFFLUENTS
   COMPARISON OF EPA ANALYSIS WITH  PERMIT APPLICATION,  mg/£
           Source: NFIC Analysis 6/22/71 from EPA  application
                    NPDES Application July 1971

OUTFALL 002    OUTFALL 007     OUTFALL 009     OUTFALL 010    OUTFALL Oil    OUTFALL 015

EPA  Applicat. EPA  Applicat.  EPA   Applicat. EPA   Applicat. EPA   Applicat. EPA   Applicat.
AMMONIA
PHENOL
CYANIDE
SUSP. SOLIDS

AMMONIA
PHENOL
CYANIDE
SUSP. SOLIDS

AMMONIA
PHENOL
CYANIDE
SUSP. SOLIDS

AMMONIA
PHENOL
CYANIDE
SUSP. SOLIDS
0.12 0.2
0.046 N.D.
0.02 N.D.
26 12
OUTFALL 017
EPA Applicat
6.3 0.1
0.693 0.288
4.27 4.37
35 26
OUTFALL 030
EPA Applicat.
0.15 N.D.
0.009 N.D.
0.0 N.D.
29 11
OUTFALL 037
EPA Applicat.
0.1 0.2
N.D.
0.0 N.D.
21 6
2.1 0.7
0.085 0.032
0.06 N.D.
53 9
OUTFALL 018
. EPA Applicat .
0.39 N.D.
0.008 0.004
0.07 0.01
23 6
OUTFALL 031
EPA Applicat.
0.12 N.D.
0.15 N.D.
0.02 N.D.
29 5
OUTFALL 038
. EPA Applicat.
0.11 No Flow
0.0
0.0
25
6.7
0.483
1.37
15.05
5.6
0.02
0.15
35
OUTFALL 019
EPA Applicat.
0.22
0.0
0.01
34
N.D.
0.002
N.D.
7
OUTFALL 033
EPA Applicat.
0.33
0.0
0.02
34
N.D.
N.D.
0.02
16
0.93 2 6.6 No Flow 0.07 0.1
0.069 0.18 0.539 " 0.0
0.0 N.D. 2.2 " - N.D.
14 37 36 " 27 8
OUTFALL 020 OUTFALL 021 OUTFALL 028
EPA Applicat. EPA Applicat. EPA Applicat
0.47 0.4 0.13 0.7 0.28 N.D.
0.053 0.018 - 0.011 0.022 N.D.
0.18 N.D. " 0.09 0.04 N.D.
25 11 S3 10 16 19
OUTFALL 034 OUTFALL 035 OUTFALL 036
EPA Applicat. EPA Applicat. EPA Applicat.
0.27 0.2 0.09 0.3 0.08 N.D.
0.129 0.03 - N.D. - 0.002
0.84 N.D. 0.01 N.D. 0.0 N.D.
38 16 31 3 25 10
OUTFALL 039
EPA Applicat.
0.13
0.009
0.0
25
0.3
N.D.
N.D.
21




                                                    C-51

-------
                          Table C-17

       U.S. STEEL GARY WORKS EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS  ma/i
COMPARISON OF NPDES,  MONTHLY OPERATING REPORTS AND EFFLUENT SURVEYS
Study by:
Study date:
Outfall 002
SS
Fe
NK3-N
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 007
US
Fe
NH3-N
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 009
SS
Fe
1JH3-N
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 010
SS
Fe
NH3-N
Phenol
Oil
Outfall Oil
SS
Fe
NH -N
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 015
SS
Fe
NHj-M
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 017
SS
Fe
NH3-N
Phenol
Oil
NPDES
7/1771
12
1.9
0.2
-
3.0

9.0
1.3
0.7
0.032
1.0

35
2.8
5.6
0.02
3.0

37
3.3
2.0
0.18
~

-
-
-
-
-

8.0
1.1
0.1
-
3.0

26
B.8
0.1
0.288
-
Survey
6722771
26
2.92
0.72
0.046
NT

53
NT
2.1
0.085
-

15
6.1
6.7
0.483
NT

14
1.32
0.93
0.069
NT

36
9.9
6.6
0.539
NT

-
-
-
-
-

35
10.3
6.3
0.693
-
Analysis
5777T5
10
1.1
O.i
0.029
5.6

76
4.1
2.4
0.029
6.0

77
0.41
4.9
0.47
7.8

3.0
1.1
0.9
0.071
6.0

16
5.5
4.6
0.182
2.1

8.0
0.3
0.1
0.001
7.0

44
14
4.9
0.38
7.0
Analysis
6/9/73
9.0
0.8
2.0
0.015
-

5.0
0.9
2.0
0.122
-

15
2.3
4.7
0.077
-

6.0
0.5
1.2
0.064
7.8

-
-
-
-
-

10
0.7
C.I
0.001
-

11
4.0
4.3
0.19
-
U.S. steel
June 1973
21
'-
-
-
3.0

31
-
2.3
0.056
2.0

44
4.5
-
-
2.0

8.0
0.5
-
-
2.0

20
2.0
-
-
1.0

11
0.1
-
-
2.0

29
2.3
-
-
2.0
                          C-52

-------
                       I«bl« C-17 (oont.)

o\i«»ll  Die                  in     ISPCD    iBfcn
itud)> byi          HPDM     »urv»v   ^nlyiU  m«iyiii  U.S. it


SB

Po
Phenol

Oil
Outfall  019
Phenol

Oil
Outfall  020
Phenol

Oil
Phenol

Oil
NU3-N


Phenol


Oil




Outfall 030
Phenol

Oil
Outfall  032
NH3-N


Phenol


Oil




Outfall 033


SS


Fe


NH3-N


Phenol


Oil
run t
C.O
o.J
-
0.004
3.0
1.0
0,20
-
0.002
4.0
11
1.3
0.4
0.018
4.0
10
1.5
0.7
0.011
3.0
19
5.8
-
-
2.0
11
2.7
-
-
3.0
5.0
0.4
-
-
3.0
16
2.6
-
-
4.0
713771 VV?) Wl 1
23 10 3.0
1.51 0.3 1.1
0.39 - 0.1
0,008 0.008 0.001
4.5
34 9.0 6.0
1.32 0.4 0.4
0.22 0.2
NF 0.019 0.001
NT 5.7
25 5
1.98 0.2
0.47 0.2
0.053 0.001
NT 0.1
53 8.0 7.0
3.8 0.4 0.2
0.13 0.1 0.1
NT 0.01 0.04
"
16 24
6.3 8.0
0.28 0.2
0.022 0.010
8.7
29 13
6.8 5.1
0.15 0.2
9.0 0.003
7.4
29 25 7.0
4.2 11.0 0.5
0.12 0.2 0.1
0.015 0.001 0.012
7.3 4.1
34 55 30
16.4 25 14
0.33 0.4 0.3
NF 0.0001 0.0001
5.7 4.4
uno 191
17
9.3
-
-
1.0
15
0.1
-
-
1.0
75
2.9
-
-
-
9.0
0.2
-
-
1.0
24
1.2
-
-
3.0
14
0.9
-
-
2.0
3.0
0.5
-
-
1.0
23
7.7
-
-
1.0
                           C-53

-------
T«bl« C-17 (cont.)
Outfall 034
Study byi
Study Datei
SB
Fa
HH3-H
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 035
SS
Fo
N)I3-H
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 036
SS
Fe
HHj-H
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 037
SS
Fe
IIH3-N
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 038
SS
Fe
NH3-fl
Phenol
Oil
Outfall 039
ES
Fe
NH3-N
Phenol
Oil
EPA ISPCD ISPCn
NPDES Survey Analysis Analysis U.S. Steel
7/1/71 S/SS/71 J/S/73 S/19/73 Junn 1973
16 38 18 - 27
0.9 4.10 4.10 - 5.0
0.2 0.27 0.2
0.030 0.129 0.146
S.O - 7.9 - 7.0

3.0 31 4.0 - 5.Q
NT 0.2 - 0.1
0.3 0.09 0.1
NT 0.001
2.0 - 5.1 - 1.0

10 25 4.0 - 8.0
0.1 0.95 0.3 - 0.1
0.08 -
0.002 NT 0.001 -
2.0 - 3.7 - 1.0

6.0 21 3.0 6.0 12
1.1 4.5 2.9 1.2 .1.8
0.2 0.1 - 0.1
NT 0.001 0.001
3.0 - 5.5 - 1.0

25 6.0 13
107 - 0.4 0.3
0.11 - 0.1
NF 0.001
- 2.0

21 25 14 8 6
1.3 5.4 1.9 0.5 0.3
0.3 0.13 0.2 0.1
0.009 0.016 0.001
? - 4.5 - 2
        C-54

-------
     Wastes from bar, slab, blooming and the 160-210 plate mills
are diverted to three lagoons where oil is skimmed and collected.,
Wastes then pass through a scale pit for additional oil and sludge
removal.  The treated effluent is discharged through outfalls
028 and 030 with a combined average flow of 141.8 mgd.
     The terminal treatment plant receives wastes from the 80-in.
and 84-in. hot strip mills.  Treatment includes four primary
separators, two settling tanks, flocculation clarifiers and a
centrifugal oil separator.  Discharge is through outfall 034 at
26.8 mgd.
     The last major treatment system is the 84-in. hot strip mill
filtration plant which receives wastes from both the 80-in. and
83-in. HSM's.  There are through-primary scale pits, through-
secondary scale pits, one finishing pit, 12 sand filters, a
thickener and vacuum filters.  Flow of 71.3 mgd from this facility
is discharged to Lake Michigan through outfall 039.
     11.5  A11erna te Wa s t e Line s
     Wastewater recirculation at the Gary Works accounts for
22.4 mgd.  The 80-in. H.S.M., the 18-in. bar mill, the 160/210
plate mill and basic oxygen  shops utilize recirculation for some
process lines.  Future construction at the 84-in. H.S.M. will
add an additional 14.4 mgd to recycle systems.
     A deep well disposal  system is operational at Gary and
receives pickle liquor from  the Gary Tube Works and the U.S.
Steel - Waukegan facility.   The depth of the well is 4303 ft and
.wastes are injected at 210 gpm at 200 psi.  Waste pickle liquor
consists of sulfuric acid  8-37%, ferric sulfate 18-251, ferric
chloride 15-20% and chromic  acid 2-6%.
     Coke plant wastes from  the ammonia concentration operation
'are diverted to the Gary Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant.
                               C-55

-------
I     11.6  American Bridge and Universal Atlas Cement Divisions
     These ancillary divisions of U.S. Steel do not have NPDES
applications on file for any discharges even though other sources,
as follow, do indicate the possibility of such discharges.  A map
of discharges (Figure C-9) from U.S. Steel prepared by personnel
from the Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board on 8/23/73 (in
ISPCB files) indicates four unreported discharges; two from the
American Bridge Division and two from Universal Atlas Cement.
The American Bridge outfalls designated AB-15 and AB-16 are
located on the Grand Calumet River at Bridge St.  Those outfalls
from Universat Atlas Cement are designated UA-L-3 and UA-L-4
on Figure C-10.  They are located on Lake Michigan.  Furthermore,
the existence of UA-L-4 is confirmed by U.S. Steel since they
include this outfall in monthly operating reports to the ISPCB.
Only data for oil, suspended solids and iron are given.  Flow
is not reported.
                              C-56

-------
                               Uft-L-3
                                UA
n
i
Cn
                                           Figure C-10



                           DETAIL  MA?  OF BTIFFINGTOH HARBOP. DISCHARGERS

-------
J12.   U.S.  STEEL SOUTH WORKS
I      	
      12.1   Introduction
      The U.S.  Steel South Works  is  an integrated steel mill pro-
 ducing 22,592  tons of steel  per  day (Attorney General  Report,
 page 4).  Coke,  however,  is  produced at  the U.S.  Steel facility
 in Gary, Indiana and shipped to  the South Works.   Production
 facilities which produce  waste water discharges  are  the blast
 furnaces,  electric furnaces,  basic  oxygen process, sintering
 plant,  casting plants and bar mills.
      The facility is located at  the junction of  the  Calumet River
with Lake  Michigan.  There are two  slips,  the north  and south
 slips,  which contain two  outfalls  shown  in Figure C-ll.   The
 North Slip is  separated from Lake Michigan by an air curtain to
 retain any oil spills. At the origin of the North Slip is  the
 main plant water intake.   Net flow  through the North Slip is
 reported by U.S. Steel as toward the intake,  never to  the lake
 (Personal  communication with plant  officials).
      12.2   Outfall Descriptions
      The company has reported six outfalls in their  NPDES appli-
 cation. Outfalls 001, 002 and 003  discharge to  Lake Michigan.
 Outfalls 004 and 005 discharge to the Calumet River  and outfall
 006 discharges to the South  Slip (see Figure C-ll).  As reported
 June 18, 1971, in the NPDES  application,  there is only one
 process water  discharge,  i.e., outfall 006.   Noncontact cooling
water is discharged through  outfalls 001,  002, 003 and 005.
 Outfall 004 is reported as inactive except for storm runoff.
      12.3   Evaluation
      NPDES application data  from 1971 can not be considered
valid to the present discharge.  On  January 18, 1971, U.S.  Steel,
 the Illinois Attorney General and the Metropolitan Sanitary
,District of Greater Chicago  (MSD) entered into a stipulated
                               C-58

-------
         6S-0
         fp        A\  '<—t^u.'i^«____

         §   /&•  V%^%   S^l
                   ^^-'     ~*~-'"
    !  '     /<•/«•. »\    f1/,// f>^ '

i  r(.   M^l^^//^'^
  ™W ft/fp^^^W/// w f!
             ^>-^>;oV*-:'.;-,<  • fj; •
             f ^^.^N//^-'-V-..<-,''   £ ; \r.

-------
(agreement leading to the complete recycle of process waste water
[with a blowdown entering the sewers of the MSB.  The Order
!(#69CH3334 and 67CH5772) was the culmination of a legal battle
lasting three years.
     Specifically, the Order provides that:
          •  A recycle system for process water from the
             "South blast furnaces shall be completed by
             October 31, 1972.
          •  A recycle system for process water from mill
             operations shall be constructed according to
             the following schedule.
                 •  Recycle for the "South" side mills
                    shall be completed not later than
                    October 31, 1974
                 •  The blow-down from the mill recycle
                    system shall be no greater than
                    3700 gpm and discharged to the MSD.
     U.S. Steel South Works is presently in the process of
complying with this stipulated agreement.  The treatment system
is shown in Figure C-12.

    A report prepared for the Illinois Attorney General (Data
Graphics, Inc. 1970) proposed effluent concentrations which
correspond to interim levels achieved by the on-going construc-
tion of recycle systems, as given in Table C-18.  These effluent
reductions will result in the following loads, based on flow at
17.4 mgd:

        INTERIM EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS AT OUTFALL 006*

      Parameter	     Load, Ib/day     Concentration, mg/l
   Suspended solids        15,025               10.3
   Oil                      1,586               10.9
                              C-60

-------


-------
                           Table C-18

                     U.S. STEEL SOUTH WORKS
         INTERIM EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS AT OUTFALL 006
Parameter
Suspended solids
Oil
Phenol
Cyanides
Fluorides
Ammonia
Acid equivalents
Load,
Ib/day
48,080
3,172
114
145
238
114
5,083
*Data from Datagraphics Report,
Proposed effluent
mg/4
Average
41.3
2.73
0.097
0.124
0.204
0.097
4.37
concentration, *
Maximum**
80.4
5.3
5.19
0.24
0.39
0.19
8.50
July, 1970, Wastewater Treatment,
 Reuse, and Disposal at South Works,  U.S.  Steel Corp.,  Chicago,
 111.

**Based on 71.7 mgd flow.
                              C-62

-------
     It is unclear at what stage U.S.  Steel is  presently at  in
its construction schedule; however,  total recycle  should take
place by October 31, 1974.
     Discharges of cooling water with flows are indicated in
Figure C-12.
                             063

-------
                           REFERENCES


Combinatorics, Inc., 1974
Load allocation study of the Grand Calumet River and Indiana
Harbor Ship Canal, Report to State of Indiana, Stream Pollution
Control Board.


Council on Economic Priorities, 1973
Environmental Steel, Washington, B.C.


Datamatics, 1970
Wastewater treatment, reuse, and disposal, Report at South Works,
U.S. Steel Corp., Chicago, 111, July 1970.


People of the State of Illinois and the Metropolitan Sanitary
District of Greater Chicago vs Inland Steel Co., 1974
Circuit court of Cook County, Illinois.
                              C-64

-------
                  APPENDIX D
MUNICIPAL SOURCES AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS
                      Di

-------
          MUNICIPAL SOURCES AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS

     This Appendix describes the status (on January 1, 1974)  of
 the sewage treatment plants and the combined sewer outfalls and
 presents available data on the flows and loads of pollutants.  In
 general it will be seen that the indicators of municipal wastes
 in this area have not improved recently, and may even have deter-
 iorated in spite of improvements in some facilities.  This is
 caused partly by delays in construction and partly by diversion
 of steel mill and other industrial wastes to certain facilities.
 A list of plants is given in Table D-l, and maps in Figures D-l
 and 4.1 (Chapter 4, Vol. I of this report).
 1.   EAST CHICAGO SANITARY DISTRICT FACILITIES
     The East Chicago Sanitary District (ECSD) was formed in  1929
 and includes the corporate boundary of the city of East Chicago.
 The total population served is about 52,000, for which the sewage
 treatment plant is adequate;  however,  about 12 major industries
 also discharge to the ECSD sewers, and this creates  problems dis-
 cussed below.  The district has  a predominantly combined sewer
 system.  This description is  from information provided to
Mr. Sweeney (1973) by personnel  of the ECSD.
     1.1  The District Wastewater Treatment Plant
     The District wastewater  treatment plant (WTP) is  located on
 the west branch of the Grand  Calumet River in East Chicago (see
 "B" on map,  Figure 4.1, Chapter  4, Vol. I of this report).   The
plant was  put into operation  in  1942 and has a 20-mgd  activated
sludge type  secondary treatment  capacity.
     Average discharge flow is  about 12-13 mgd,  but  flows approach-
ing the 20-mgd plant design capacity are common.   Some flow data
and effluent loads are given  in  Table  D-2.
     A 140-150 million gallon detention basin has been constructed
on the plant property,  and its  surface aerators  provide additional
oxidation  capability.
                                D-l

-------
o
 I
ho
                                                      Table   Dl


                              SUMMARY OF  MUNICIPAL WTP  DISCHARGES IN CALUMET AREA
Map
Ref.
No.
1.
System
Public Systems
Hammond S. D.
Hammond
Munster
Whiting
Griffith
Highland
Type of
sewer
c,s
c(s
c
c,s
c,s
Secondary
treatment
capacity,
mgd
36.0
Inflow
Average Receiving Point to
flow, mgd waterwav Lake Michigan
36.0 Grand Calumet R. I.H.C.*
Comment
Under construction
for expansion to
48.0 MGD capacity.
Contract area.
Contract area
Contract Area
           East Chicago S.D.

             East Chicago
Gary S.D.
                               20.0
                                             12.5
                                                                Grand Calumet R.   I.H.C.



4.
5.


6.
7.
8.
Gary
E . Gary
Merrillville
Portage
Chesterton
Chesterton
Porter
Valparaiso
Hobart
Crown Point
c.
c,
c.
S

c,
C,

S
c.
s
s
s


s
s


5
60.


3.
1.


6.
2.
0


0
5


0
1
1.8
46


1
1


3
2
1
.0


.2
.2


.5
.5
.7
Grand


Burns
Little


Calumet R.


Ditch
Calumet R.


Salt Creek
Deep River
Beaver
Dam Creek
I.H.C,


Burns
Burns


Burns
Burns
Burns



Ditch
Ditch


Ditch
Ditch
Ditch
Much Industrial

wastewater.
                                                                                                Newly expanded



                                                                                                Plant overloaded
                                                                to Turkey Creek
    *Flow often  is west to Illinois.
     c is combined;  s is  separated.

-------
                                               Table  Dl (cont.)
REF.
No.

9.
10.

11.
12.
13.
? 14.
LO
15.
16.
17.
18.

19.
20.
System Type
of Sewerl
Semi -Public &
Private Systems
Bon Air Subd.
Brookview
Terrace Subd.
Knob Hill Subd.
Lake George Subd.
Lincolns Gardens
Rolling Hills
Est. Subd.
Schererville Hts.
Triple A. Util.
Ideal Dev. Inc.
Neighborhood Util.

South Haven Subd.
• Pleasant Valley

S
S

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

S

Secondary Trt
Cap. (MGD)

0.
0.

0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.

1.


36
10

10
10
20
035
06
05
10
10

4

Avg. Receiving
Flow (MGD) Waterway

Turkey Creek
Turkey Creek

Deep River
Deep River
0.16 Turkey Creek
Turkey Creek
0.05 Turkey Creek
Deep River
Salt Creek
Salt Creek

0.5** Salt Creek

Inflow Pt. Comment
to Lake Mich.

Burns
Burns

Burns
Burns
Burns
Burns
Burns
Burns
Burns
Burns

Burns


Ditch
Ditch

Ditch
Ditch
Ditch
Ditch
Ditch
Ditch
Ditch
Ditch • Expansion to
2.0 MGD
Ditch

       Mobile Home Park
0.08
0.013**   Squirrel Creek  Burns Ditch
** Estimated.

-------
                                                  Table  Dl  (cont.)
REF.        System        Type      Secondary Trt       Avg.
No.                     of Sewer1     Cap.  (MGD)      Flow (MGD)
                           Receiving
                           Inflow Pt.
                         to Lake Mich.
                                                                                                         Connaert
      Semi-Public &
       Private Systems

21.   Robbinswood
        Subd.

22.   Oak Tree Park
       Mobile Home Park

23.   Elmwood
       Mobile Home Park

24.   Sands Mobile
       Home Park

25.   Porter County
        Home
0.078

0.063



0.048


0.015
0.026      Salt Creek    Burns Ditch

0.017      Salt Creek    Burns Ditch
           Damon Run to
 0.04       salt Creek   Burns Ditch

           Damon Run to
 0.01**     salt Creek   Burns Ditch
                                        Septic  Tank       0.003      Salt Creek    Burns Ditch
**Estimated.

-------
a
i
Ul
                                                                          Wastewater treatment facility

                                                                          (The number beside each

                                                                          refers to the Ref. No. on the

                                                                          summary table.


                                                                          Basin Boundary Line
                                             Figure D-l



                     MAP OF LAKE-PORTER  REGION WASTEWATER  TREATMENT  FACILITIES

-------
                                      Table D-2

              YEARLY EFFLUENT AVERAGES OF THE THREE MAJOR SANITARY DISTRICTS


Municipality
Hammond






East Chicago






(through 9/73)
Gary
J







Year
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
WTP design
capacity, Flow,
mgd mgd
36.00 35.1
32.1
33.0
35.
38
36
38
20.00 11.3
11.8
11.5
11.9
11.0
12.1
16.1
14.4
60.00 42.1
46.1
48,5
44.06
45.5
40.1
46.5


Raw,
mg/l
182
156
223
196
151
187
172
91
154
150
142
128
147
131
153
142
89
101
123
119
123
135
BOD

Final,
mg/£
22
21
39
24.4
22.6
20.9
36.2
9
16
28
32
43
48
54
56
10
16
11
12
16
22
29
Suspended solids

Load,
Ib/day
6,446
5,628
10,725
7,203
7,190
6,431
11,532
846
1,568
2,688
3,175
3,944
4,843
7,250
6,725
3,510
6,144
4,444
4,409
6,071
7,357
11,246

Raw,
mg/l
264
252
407
369
234
361
229
103
110
111
124
127
113
147
197
«.
239
200
202
224
230
225

Final,
mg/£
23
27
37
31
35
29
46
12
18
27
28
34
30
50
39
43
43
21
24
34
43
51

Load.
Ib/day
6,739
7,236
10,175
9,270
11,199
8,924
14,750
1,128
1,764
2.592
2,778
3,119
3,027
6,713
4,683
15,093
16,512
8,484
8,819
12,901
14,380
19,778
Source: Hammond S.D. WTP Monthly Operating Reports,
        East Chicago WTP Monthly Operating Report.
        Annual Report Gary Sanitary District.

-------
      Interim  phosphorus  removal  facilities  were  put  into  operation
 in  June  1972,  and  permanent  facilities were operational by Septem-
 ber 1973.   The  80% P  removal  recommendations  of  the  1968  Lake
 Michigan Enforcement  Conference  is  being met  according  to District
 personnel.  Effluent  concentration  data in  Table D-3  indicate  that
 the 1 mg/£  P  concentration limit recommended  as  an objective by
 the 1972 Lake Michigan Enforcement  Conference  is not  always being
 met.  Other   parameters  are  less well controlled, as  will be
 discussed below.
     Chlorination  of  effluent discharged to the Grand Calumet
 River is provided,  but this is not  effective  in killing bacteria.
 The  reasons for this  are discussed  in the following.
     1.2  Planned  Plant  Improvements
     The  Four-State  Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference Technical
 Committee (1968) put  a July 1, 1977, deadline  on completion of
 advanced waste water  treatment (AWT) by the ECSD, and the  District
 anticipates meeting this deadline.   AWT plans were approved by
 the  Indiana Stream  Pollution Control Board  (ISPCB) and the U.S.
 EPA, but the District is now reconsidering  the methods involved
 and  finds them too costly.   Possibly, new AWT  plans will  be sub-
mitted,   and it is probable that feasibility planning of WTP
 expansion to increase the design capacity from its existing 20-mgd
 to a 26-30 mgd capacity may take place.
     The ECSD is planning on a Fiscal 1974  infiltration study
which is expected to cost $200,000  and will help determine whether
 sewer repair,  WTP expansion,  or both is  necessary to handle the
 problem of the increased flows to the WTP.
     Problems  of influent loads from industries are recognized
by ECSD.
     A program of industrial  influent analysis will be undertaken
in 1974, and it is estimated  by the District that an additional
$150,000 for laboratory equipment will be  spent to monitor
influents.   Influent regulations so far  have been limited  to
informal agreements with industry.
                               D-7

-------
                                                Table  D-3

                  EAST  CHICAGO SANITARY DISTRICT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT  REPORT*
                                                   1973
BOD
Mg/1

JAN.
FEB.
MAR.
APR.
7 MAY
00
JUN.
JUL.
AUG.
MGD
18.6
18.5
12.0
12.6
12.6

11.2
10.9
18.1
Raw
84
125
95
130
155

163
180
195
Fin.
26
36
48
45
63

66
70
75
SS
Mg/1
Raw
182
225
-
332
160

146
201
215
Fin.
38
35
42
78
33

31
29
38
NH3
Mg/1
Raw
76
79
93
76
94

100
117
100
Fin.
75
88
98
76
92

96
121
111
Cn~
Phenol
Mg/1 JUg/1
Raw
.40
1.2
1.12
1.30
1.34

1.04
0.85
0.88
Fin.
.33
.23
.49
1.16
0.18

0.63
0.43
0.53
Raw
5.6
1.18
1.40
2.3
1.25

2.16
1.39
4.3
Fin.
.34
.015
.02
.264
.02

.23
.06
1.24
Fe P04~
mg/1
Raw
3.7
3.1
-
3.3
3.6

2.9
2.6
3.4
Fin.
1.2
1.0
1.6
1.4
1.3

1.5
0.9
1.3
Mg/1
Raw
1.3
1.3
-
1.0
1.0

1.1
1.3
1.2
Fin.
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4

0.3
0.3
0.2
N03~
Mg/1
Raw
6.2
5.8
5.8
4.6
4.6

4.3
3.2
3.6
Fin.
3.1
2.9
1.7
1.70
2.3

1.7
1.9
1.7
% Purif.
BOD
69
71
66
65
59

59
61
62
SS
79
85
78
78
79

78
85
87
•Source:  East Chicago S.D. WTP Monthly Operating Reports

-------
    1.3  Plant Performance and Effluents
     Analysis of effluents from the WTP are shown in Table D-3.
The most striking deficiency is in NHo-N levels in the effluent.
This plant is an important source of NHo> and is causing viola-
tions of NH^-N values in the Lake, as described in Chapter 13.
The load is 10,000 Ib/day NH-j-N with a maximum of 30,000 Ib/day
(Combinatorics 1974).  That the effluent has deteriorated can be
seen by comparing Table D-3 with Table D-4.
     Excessive NH^-N has another harmful effect, in that it makes
effective chlorination impossible.  Chlorine is known (Palin 1973)
to react with NHo> and residual chlorine is needed to sterilize
the effluents.  Table D-3 does not report the bacterial counts-in
the plant effluents, but we believe that they are very high.  On
November 30, 1973, IITRI sampled the Grand Calumet River upstream
and downstream of the plant outfall, and found high total coli-
form concentrations downstream (Table 16.4, Chapter 16, Vol. I
of this report).  Effluents from EC WTP appear to be the largest
source of coliform bacteria measured in the IH.C as reported in
Chapter 16.
                           Table D-4*
                        EAST CHICAGO STP
                SPECIAL EFFLUENT ANALYSIS, mg/jfc
Year
1966
1967
1968
NH3
18.9
23.6
48.5
Nitrate
-
-
0.71
Phenol
0.009
0.010
0.232
Iron Phosphorus
3.6
2.8
1.6 3.8
Cyanide
0.18
0.19
0.28
*(Technical Committee on Water Quality 1970)
                               D-9

-------
     The amount of NH-, is far in .excess of what would be expected
in a plant serving a population the size of East Chicago.  The
source of NH~ is the waste water from steel mills, primarily from
Inland Steel and Youngs town Sheet and Tube.  This is shown in
testimony presented in a lawsuit (People of the State of Illinois
vs Inland Steel Co. 1974).  The NHo comes from ammonia stills used
in coke oven operations.  In addition to NHo, there are also
problems with other wastes.  One of these is excess lime, which
is needed to raise the pH so that the NH^ can be distilled off.
Mechanical problems with the lime slaker sometimes result in
excesses of lime being sent to the sewer.  When it reaches the
WTP, this lime can suddenly raise the pH, killing the bacteria
that function in the activated sludge process.  The result is an
upset and a period of very poor sewage treatment.  Other wastes
can be related to industrial sources as well.  These include the
relatively high levels of cyanide and phenol shown in Table D-4.
Data are not given on oil, but its presence might be expected,
as well as heavy metals.
     1.4  Pretreatment Guidelines
     U.S. EPA guidelines  (1973) for municipal treatment plants
receiving federal grants  state that (p. 13) it is important that
no discharge from any source to the publicly owned treatment
works interfere with treatment processes or result in a violation
of effluent limitations.  There must therefore be a legal basis
for regulating and controlling all discharges to the publicly
owned treatment works, such as a municipal ordinance.  It may
be necessary to establish a local system which will allocate
waste loads to industrial users so that biological treatment
processes are not inhibited and to ensure that effluent limita-
tions are met.
     The guidelines generally do not set limits on the concen-
trations of various pollutants discharged to the sewers, except
that they specify a 50 mg/£ limit for oil from refineries.  The
guidelines specify several pretreatment processes that may be
                               D-10

-------
used by petroleum refiners, steel mills, and starch syrup plants,
but these do not appear to consider all of the problems to which
the East Chicago plant is exposed due to ammonia discharges.
     Pretreatment guidelines for the steel industry are also given
in the EPA Iron and Steel Guidelines (1974).   These guidelines
recommend that sufficient pretreatment be given so that after
further treatment by the municipal plant, the effluents will meet
the standards for new sources.   The various processes that can
be used for removal of ammonia  and other pollutants are listed.
Some municipalities have imposed limits on discharges of certain
pollutants to sewers, with rather high charges for industries
that exceed these limits.  We recommend that such a course be
undertaken by East Chicago.
     1.5  Storm and Combined Sewer Overflows
     The three major Calumet area sanitary districts are also
required to treat or control combined sewer overflows.   The out-
falls from these combined sewer overflows are shown on the map
of Figure D-2.
     The ECSD is responsible for two combined sewer overflow
discharges to the Grand Calumet River (GCR),  one to the IHC and
one storm water discharge to the IHC.  These  are shown in Figure
D-2 and Table D-5.  There is no flow monitoring at this time,
but Table D-5 includes peak flow estimates.
     The District constructed a 140-150 million gallon detention
lagoon in 1971 to hold the diverted flow from several combined
sewer overflows for treatment.   The completion of the project
requires increases in the pumping capacity of the system, which
has been delayed due to bond sale problems.  The lagoon is thus
                              D-ll

-------
                                            .017
LEGEND:
 -+•  STORM AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS
     » - storm
     c = combined
  H  HAMMOND SANITARY DISTRICT
 EC  EAST CHICAGO SANITARY DISTRICT
  G  GARY SANITARY DISTRICT
  O  WATER QUALITY SAMPLING STATIONS
  »  SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
                                                                                U i c h i g  a a
\->
to
                                                                                                                      EAST GARY
                                                  MUNSTER
                                                                                | HIGHLAND j
                                                                                                     GRIFFITH
                                                        Figure   D-2

                                          SEWER OUTFALLS  IN CALUMET AREA

-------
                                                  Table D-5


                                     MAJOR COMBINED  SEWER OUTFALLS TO IHC

                                         Source:  Combinatorics (1974)
o

M
Co
Municipality
Gary
Gary
Gary
Gary
Hammond
East Chicago
East Chicago
River Mile
Location
8.34, 8.26
7.10, 7.04
6.00, 5.77
3.46
1.90
(West Branch)
2.4
.7
(West Branch)
Combined Sewer
Description
Outfalls
.006 and .007
Outfalls
.008 and .009
Outfalls
.010 and .011
Outfall .012
Treatment plant
bypass
Cline Ave. Outfal
Alder St. pumping
station (storm w
and combined
Treatment plant
bypass
Peak Flow [cfs]
1 yr. storm
215.6
593.4
310.7
189.6
70.0
301.4
iter
128.0
5 yr. storm
327.4
892.4
466.7
286.5
100.0
455.2
192.7
Average Flow [cfs]
1 yr. storm
116.1
305.8
159.4
99.7
35.0
158.2
66.2
5 yr. storn
173.0
455.2
176.7
148.3
50.0
235.5
98.6

-------
not yet receiving any diverted flow and the possible need for a
i
re-bid by the contractor may delay completion until the end of
*1974.  The two combined sewer overflow points to the GCR are
located 400 yd and 1000 yd, respectively, west of the Cline Avenue
bridge.  These wet weather discharges will be diverted to the
detention lagoon at the WTP as soon as the new interceptor sewer
and the pumping station expansion projects are completed.
     No interim chlorination is being provided, since the Dis-
trict has been too uncertain about the time delay to justify it
economically  (Sweeney 1973).  There are no data available to
judge the effects of these  sources on water quality.
     The storm water discharge from the Canal St. pumping station
to  the IHC is a result of  sewer separation of the area bounded
by  the IHC on the east and  Indianapolis Blvd. on the west.  The
Canal St. pumping station has discharged unchlorinated storm
vater to the  IHC beginning  about October 1971.
     On the east side of the IHC, opposite of the Canal  Street
pumping station discharge  point, is the Michigan Avenue  pumping
station combined sewer overflow discharge point.  This discharge
is  tentatively being considered for treatment by microstraining
and chlorination as opposed to the alternatives of  sewer separa-
tion, expansion of sewer capacity or detention basin methods of
controlling this problem.
2.   THE HAMMOND SANITARY  DISTRICT
     The Hammond Sanitary  District  (HSD) was  formed in 1938 and
includes the  corporate boundaries of the cities of  Hammond and
Munster.  The HSD also services the cities of Whiting, Griffith
and Highland  by contracted agreement.  The total population
served by the District is  about 175,000.  There are also several
industries discharging to  the HSD,  including  American Maize and
Lever Brothers.
                               D-14

-------
       2.1  The District Wastewater Treatment Plant
     The following description of plant status is from HSD
personnel (Sweeney 1973).
     The HSD wastewater treatment plant is located on the west
branch of the Grand Calumet River.  See plant "A" on map, Figure
4.1.  The plant was put in operation in 1942 and incorporates an
activated sludge secondary treatment process with a 36-mgd
capacity.  The plant is often overloaded,  since flows through
the plant vary from 36-42 mgd.  The plant  is presently under
construction to expand the secondary treatment capacity to 48 mgd
by 1974 as recommended by the Four State Lake Michigan Enforcement
Conference in 1968, and in a follow-up 180-day notice issued by the
U.S. EPA, Enforcement Division on October  12, 1971.  Although the
ordered date of completion was December 7, 1973,  delays in equip-
ment delivery will cause completion to be  delayed until March
1974.
     The appearance of the receiving stream was very bad during
IITRI sampling on November 30, 1973, with  unsightly growths,
anaerobic conditions,  and floating sewage; however, chlorination
of effluents is apparently effective,  since the bacterial count
is not high (Table 16.4 , Chapter 16).
     The plant effluent discharged to the  Grand Calumet River
has deteriorated somewhat during the last  year because of the
construction.   Preconstruction averages are found in Table D-2.
Even these do not meet 1968 Lake Michigan  Enforcement recommenda-
tions of 5 mg/4 BOD and suspended solids.
     Shock loadings of organics from the American Maize and
Lever Brothers' plants have tended to impair plant efficiency
at times, as each plant discharges effluent of extremely high
BOD and suspended solids to the sewers at  inconsistent intervals
(Sweeney 1973).  This  problem is mentioned in the U.S. EPA
pretreatment guidelines (1973).  The Swift Chemical plant which
is now closed but which is soon to be operated by Ashland
                              D-15

-------
Chemical Company, was responsible for the discharge of oil
emulsions which broke down into oil globules when within the
sewers and caused serious pump-screen clogging, impairment of
plant processes, and additional disposal problems.  Pretreatment
should be required, with effective enforcement of pretreatment
regulations.
     Because the direction of the flow in the Grand Calumet River
at the point where the District WTP discharges is variable, a
barrier dam to be placed immediately to the east of the plant
in the Grand Calumet River was proposed by several agencies to
serve as a control structure (Combinatorics 1974).  The barrier
dam is still being considered by the HSD since this method of
preventing the high phosphorus levels in the plant discharge from
reaching Lake Michigan might be less costly than the installation
and operation of permanent in-plant phosphorus reduction facili-
ties.  The dam is being considered by Indiana SPCB, although
diversion of sewage effluents to Illinois waters might not be
approved.
     The cities served by the HSD have predominantly combined
sewer systems, and force mains are necessary to maintain flow
because of the level topography.  The sewage from the city of
Hammond accounts for about 7570 of the total flow to the plant,
with about 0.5 mgd being contributed from both American Maize
and Lever Brothers.  Whiting, with domestic sewage from a popu-
lation of 7,000, contributes 2.5 mgd average flow.  The munici-
palities of Griffith and Highland contribute average flows of
about 2 mgd and 3   mgd, respectively.
     The City of Whiting has recently held discussions with the
U.S.  EPA and Indiana SPCB concerning the construction of its own
wastewater treatment plant; but with the trend in wastewater
treatment toward regionalization,  Whiting was urged to continue
its contract with the HSD.  Whiting is presently doing sewer
improvement work to try to decrease a problem of infiltration
of water into its sewers.
                               D-16

-------
       2.2  Planned Plant Improvements
     As previously stated,  the HSD treatment plant capacity will
be expanded to 48 mgd by the spring of 1974 according to HSD
personnel (Sweeney 1973).  This expansion will also increase
digester capacity and provide nitrification tanks.  Phosphorus
removal facilities are not planned because of uncertainty about
building a dam.  The 8070 P removal requirement is not being met.
Plans for AWT for the HSD plant were submitted to the state for
approval on October 15, 1973, and call for a system of multi-
media filters (gravity sand filtration) which are expected to meet
the 1968 Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference requirement of BOD
and suspended solids effluent levels of less than 5 mg/4.  This
is to be completed by February 15, 1975 according to agreement
with U.S. EPA.  The HSD is scheduled to obtain 1974 funding for
AWT.
       2.3  Combined Sewer Overflows
     The HSD has subdivided its District into 17 distinguishable
drainage basins, and it does a commendable job of reporting the
discharges.  The combined sewer overflow discharge points from
these areas and monthly volumes discharged are listed in Table
D-6.  The locations are also shown in Figure D-2.
     HSD has been pursuing a program of constructing relief
sewers over the last ten years to intercept combined sewer over-
flows.  These were designed and located so as to provide the
trunk phase for eventual sewer operation.  In completing this
separation, the District is planning construction of lateral
sewer connections to relief trunk sewers and the elimination of
surface drainage inlets.  The District expects the remaining
planning and construction for separation and chlorination of
storm discharges to cost nearly $30 million in the next five
years.
                               D-17

-------
                                                     Table
o
I
                              COMBINED SEWER  OVERFLOW - HAMMOND  SANITARY  DISTRICT*

                                            Million  gallons  per month
Overflow Discharge
Location
GRAND CALUMET RIVER
Sohl Ave .
Johnson Ave.
Kennedy Ave.
Kennedy Ave. (New Bldg.)
Columbia Ave.
Sub-Totals (MG)
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER
Walnut Ave.
Kennedy Ave. Ejector
Baring Ave.
Tapper Ave.
173d - Homan Ave.
Hohman - Munster
Van Buren Ave.
Jackson Ave.
Indianapolis Blvd.
Sub-Totals (MG)
WOLF LAKE (Storm water
Roby
Forsythe Park
Sheffield Ave.
AUG

26.
25.
32.
30.
188.
304.

2.
1.
0.
13.
18.
1.
1.
9.
1.
48.
only)
10.
5.
3.

9
2
9
9
1
0

0
1,
4
2
9
1
6
0
7
9

0
7
1
SEP

43.7
9.2
40.0
38.3
224.5
355.7

1.3
14.0
7.1
14.6
5.6
1.1
2.0
39.2
4.3
89.2

10.9
56.7
3.7
1972
OCT

5.
2.
14.
25.
193.
240.

6.
1.
5.
5.
~1
0.
0.
3.
4.
31.

10.
4.
0.

4
5
2
1
4
6

7
3
5
9
5
6
7
5
4
1

2
3
9
NOV

5.7
4.6
32. J
39.9
355.3
437.6

17.9
10.0
38.4
21.2
9.8
2.1
2.8
17.2
8.1
127.5

2.7
19.9
4.5
one

16.1
9.4
34.0
41.3
283.9
384.7

19.8
12.6
43.8
19.2
10.6
1.5
3.8
44. 8
19.2
175.3

11.1
28.8
1.9
JAN

7.
3.
14,
38.
323.
386.

9.
1.
16.
7.
1.
9.
5.
51.
24.
127.

12.
45.
3.

.0
.8
.5
.3
.2
.8

.6
8
.8
9
8
.1
1
1
0
2

3
1
3
FEB

0
0.2
3.0
19.2
209.0
229.4

0.2
0.0
10.6
0.1
0.02
0.01
2.0
0.0
0.0
12.9

8.0
17.4
1.5
MAR

7.1
5.6
37.9
46.4
389.1
486.1

21.1
4.5
35.2
21.4
13.4
2.1
4.5
13.1
17.8
133.1

12.3
10.4
2.6
1973
APR MAY

7.
6.
40.
48.
530.
633.

40.
5.
32.
22.
1.
3.
0.
2.
33.
142.

0.
38.
2.

7
5
2
8
3
5

1
3
5
6
8
7
3
5
5
3

5
9
8

28.
16.
28.
43.
430.
548.

12.
9.
4.
6.
9.
1.
2.
1.
25.
72.

12.
47.
4.

9
5
6
7
4
1

1
8
6
8
6
3
1
2
1
6

5
0
8
JUN

12.
5.
18.
32.
313.
381.

8.
3.
8.
12.
5.
0.
1.
0.
6.
47.

11.
45.
2.

1
6
1
3
0
1

5
6
6
5
1
8
1
~i
8
7

4
3
5
JUL

9.4
51.5
11.3
10.8
37.6
120.6

2.2
1.3
6.5
4.0
1.0
0.3
0.2
0.0
3.5
19.0

.2
.2
.1
AUG

7.7
.2
7.1
9.1
36.9
60.9

.4
.2
3.4
1.0
.1
.1
.6
0.0
1.6
7.4

5.1
4.9
.8
         Sub-Totals (MG)




    LAKE MICHIGAN




     Robertsdale
                                     71.3    15.4
                                                  27.1
                           41.8   60.7   26.9   25.3   42.2   64.3   59.2
                                                                                                          .5
      (Chlorinated storm water

     as of May, 1973).

     GRAND TOTALS (MG)        412.6  556.5   328.2  652.2  635.3   587.0  281.5  696.9  910.4  770.0  548.3  171.6
                                                                                                              10.8
40.9   40.3   41.1   60.0   33.5   30.3   12.3   52.4   92.4   85.0   60.3   31.5   12,3
                                                                                91.4
     *Source: HSD Monthly Combined Sewer Overflow Reports.

-------
     Already completed in this large-scale plan is the complete
separation of the combined sewer overflow in the Robertsdale
area.  The Robertsdale pumping station overflow discharge to
Lake Michigan (Atchison Avenue extended) was the subject of
federal enforcement action in the form of a 180-day notice by
the Enforcement Division of U.S.  EPA issued on October 12, 1971.
As of May 1973 the Robertsdale discharge to Lake Michigan consists
only of chlorinated storm water,  according to HSD personnel
(Sweeney 1973).   This individual action by the HSD has cost
about $4 million in its entirety.
     The contract areas of the District have also been subject
to enforcement action in regard to combined sewer overflow dis-
charges.  The City of Whiting was issued a consent decree by the
District Court on September 6, 1973, which ordered its two com-
bined sewer discharges to Lake Michigan to be diverted by
November 15, 1974.  Whiting is planning a 30 million gallon
detention basin to meet this requirement at an estimated cost of
$3 million.  A construction grant was approved by U.S. EPA in 1973.
     The Indiana SPCB ordered the town of Griffith to cease from
discharging of combined sewer overflow by December 31, 1976.
See Figure D-2.   Griffith is therefore proposing to build a
34-mgd WTP to treat its combined sewer overflow.
     Highland has submitted plans to the Indiana SPCB and is
awaiting funding to complete its sewer separation in the north-
east part of town.  This would eliminate combined sewage over-
flow from its two overflow discharges.
3.   THE GARY SANITARY DISTRICT
     The Gary Sanitary District (GSD) serves over 200,000 people
and various industries in Gary, East Gary, and Merrillville.
The GSD was formed in 1938, and the District plant was put in
operation in 1940.  It is located on a 52-acre site on the east
branch of the Grand Calumet River.  (See Figure D-l.)  Improve-
ments in facilities have been made, mostly through a $6 million
                              D-19

-------
 expenditure  for  expansion  in 1962.
      The  Merrillville Conservancy District negotiated a con-
 tractual  agreement with  the GSD to treat its sewer flows subse-
 quent to  1969.   As of the  end of 1972, the flow from Merrillville
 to  the Gary  District plant was averaging 2 mgd.
      The  Miller  Treatment  Plant in East Gary was shut down in
 July  of 1971, and all East Gary sewage is now diverted to the
 District  plant (a flow averaging about 1.5 mgd).  Gary has
 predominantly a  combined sewer system, while East Gary and
 Merrillville have separate sewer systems.
      3.1  The District Plant
      The  GSD WTP has a primary design capacity of 80 mgd and
 activated sludge type secondary treatment capacity of 60 mgd.
 Chlorination is  now provided for disinfection of the effluent
 discharged to the Grand  Calumet River, which flows into the
 Indiana Harbor Canal and hence, Lake Michigan.  The yearly
 average flow in  1972 was 46.5 mgd, and the 1972 average effluent
 BOD and suspended solids levels were 29 mg/je, and 51 mg/£,
 respectively.  The 1973  monthly averages of sonv effluent
 parameters are listed in Table D-7.  The flow has increased,
 with  no improvement in BOD or solids removal.
      3.2  Planned Treatment Plant Improvements
     As a result of a court decree initiated by Indiana SPCB,
and a U.S. EPA 180-day notice, the GSD is being forced
 to improve its District plant effluent through implementation of
phosphorus removal facilities and AWT facilities.   Combined
 sewer overflows have also been the subject of these actions,
and plans for their chlorination and eventual elimination are to
be drawn up.   The original suit  and notice required these actions
 to be completed by December 31, 1972.  This deadline was not met.
The goals were as follows :
                               D-20

-------
                                                Table  D-7

                                GARY  SANITARY DISTRICT TREATMENT  PLANT*
                                          PERFORMANCE  DATA 1973
OVERALL
AVG. FLOW BOD(p.p.m.)
MGD RAW FINAL





G
to
h-1

JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
55.9
49.6
55.0
61.6
57.7
58.0
50.43
51.0
128
125
126
102
93
104
151
238
28
31
42
32
15
22
26
29
SS(p.
RAW
219
220
294
207
187
214
266
449
.p.m. )
FINAL
55
82
74
70
25
45
38
40
AMMONIA i'p.p.m.)
RAW FINAL
6.4
9
-
8
9
10
8
13
5.2
8
-
4
5
5
3
10
P04(p.p.m.) PERCENT PURIFICATICM
RAW FINAL BOD SS
6.9
7
-
11
16
20
22
22
4.3
5
-
5
11
13
13
13
78
75
67
68
84
79
83
88
75
63
75
66
86
79
86
91
*Source:  Gary S.D.  WTP Monthly Operating Reports.

-------
          •   Phase A consists of phosphorus removal to a
              concentration 1 mg/£ as P or 80% over-all
              removal, and improvements to preliminary and
              primary parts of the treatment system.

          •   Phases B and C consist of Secondary Treatment
              improvement, sludge handling improvements,
              and construction of AWT to attain the 5 mg/£
              BOD and suspended solids ordered, and to
              provide a high degree of nitrification.

          •   Permanent phosphorus reduction facilities
              are to be capable of 80% removal.

          •   Interim chlorination of storm and combined
              sewer overflows, and in-plant regulator
              control facilities is planned.

     On January 24, 1973, the GSD received a federal grant of

$3,996,150 for Phase A construction, but because of an injunction

brought by a citizen against the bond sales by the GSD, con-

struction was delayed.

     3.3  Storm and Combined Sewer Overflows

    The GSD is responsible for seven combined sewer overflow

discharges and a separate storm sewer system discharge to the
Grand Calumet River.  The seven combined sewer overflows are

located at Rhone, Island Street, Alley 9E, Polk Street, Pierce

Street, Bridge Street, Chase Street, and Colfax Street.  See

Figure D-2 for locations.  Disinfection or control of these
discharges is being implemented by the end of 1973.  Phase A

improvements are to provide for the control of the operation of
the combined sewage regulators on sewer interceptors at the
wastewater treatment plant, and for some improvements in pumping
station and interceptor flow capacity.
                              D-22

-------
4.  CHESTERTON
     The Chesterton, Indiana,  wastewater treatment plant serves
the town of Chesterton and the town of Porter,  which have a com-
bined population of about 10,000.   The plant uses an activated
sludge type secondary process  and has a 1.5 mgd capacity.  The
effluent is discharged to Beaver Dam Ditch, which flows into the
Little Calumet River and thence to Burns Ditch and Lake Michigan.
The 1973 effluent parameter levels are listed in Table D-8.
     The Indiana SPCB held a hearing on January 6, 1972,  to
determine the need for Chesterton WTP to install phosphorus
reduction facilities capable of 80%  P  removal.  An order was
issued which called for December 31,  1972,  completion of such
facilities.  Chesterton contested this order,  but has since
agreed to install the required facilities.   These facilities
plan to use pickling acid for   P  removal rather than the
customary ferric chloride.  The facilities  were expected to be
operational by the end of October 1973.
     Chesterton has also submitted plans for approval to the
state for storm water separation of the present combined sewer
system.
5.   PORTAGE WTP
     The Portage WTP serves its 20,000 plus population through
a separated sewer system and its 3.0-mgd activated sludge type
secondary treatment facilities.   Phosphorus  removal facilities
have been operational since February 1973,  and the chlorinated
effluent is discharged to Burns Ditch.  Monthly effluent levels
for 1973 are reported in Table D-9.
6.  HOB ART WTP
     The Hobart WTP serves a population of  about 21,000,  by a
combination of combined and separated sewers.   The 2.1-mgd design
capacity at the WTP is often overloaded due to sewer infiltration
problems.  Performance data are given in Table D-10.  The
                              D-23

-------
                                              Table  D-8

                           CHESTERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT  REPORTS*
                                                 1973
Daily Avg. Flow BOD (mg/1)
(MGD) Raw Final
Jan- 1-2 87.8 5.8






D
i
N3
4>
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
1
1
1
1
1
1

.3
.2
.3
.2
.5
.2
.92
.83
77
87
79
106
142
101
97
99
7
9
4
7.4
7.6
5
4.4
10.3
Susp. Solids (mg/1)
Raw Final
69 6
79
69
83
73
51
71
98
118
9
6
. 6
6
6
6
5.5
4
BOD
93
90
90
94
93
94
95
94
89
Percent Purif.
SS
91
89
91
92
92
88
91
95
96
*Source:  Chesterton WTP Monthly Operating Reports

-------
                                                Table D-9

                           TOWN OF PORTAGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PIANT REPORT*
                                                   1973





o
1
Ul


Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Daily Avg.
Flow (MGD)
1.14
.734
1.16
1.49
1.30
1.39
1.06
1.04
1.10
BOD (mg/1)
Raw Final
159 7.7
214
192
185
186
178
319
321
333
7
9
24
11
5
7
7
7
.0
.8
.3
.5
.9
.4
.0
.3
Susp. Solids (mg/1) Percent Purification Phosphorus
Raw Final BOD SS Raw Fina1
47 6.9 98.1 95.8 8.3 4.0
109
111
72
102
157
180
175
178
7.
7.
18
6.
€.
5.
6.
9.
6
5

4
3
5
0
7
96.7
94.8
86.8
93.8
96.6
97.6
97.8
93.0
93.
95.
75.
93.
95.
96.
96.
94.
0 6.0 1.65
2 5.6 1.3
0 4.16 1.1
7 3.0 .5
4 3.7 1.0
9 4.36 .67
5 6.9 .3
5 -
Percent
51.1
72.7
76.7
65.8
83.9
69.5
84.9
79.3
-
*Source:  Portage WTP Monthly Operating Reports.

-------
                                     Table D-10

                         HOBART V¥?TFWATER TREATMENT PLANT
                              1973 OPERATING REPORTS*
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Aor
May
? Jun
NJ
^ Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
llov
Avy . Flov.7
2.9H
2.7G
2.75
2.93
2.73
2.99
2.45
2.23
2.11
1.99 -
2.01
bOD
Raw Final
66
75
70
77
107
IOC
140
125
1C 3
161
145
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.5
3.1
5.9
6.1
9.4
11.5
13.5
10.0
Suspend
Raw
56
G2
CO
61
GO
03
99
102
122
116
106
ed Solids
Final
4.4
4.G
4.7
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.9
6.8
11.3
10.0
7.7
% Removal
BOD SS
93.5
9^.4
94.0
94.0
94.0
94.0
95.C
94.4
92. C
91.6
93.0
90.4
91.0
93.1
93.0 .
94.5
93.0
95.0
98.5
90.7
91.0
92.7 '
* Hobart VJTP Monthly Operatinq Reports

-------
chlorinated effluent is discharged to Deep River.   Plans for
expansion to a 5-6 mgd design capacity and for AWT implementation
are awaiting federal funding.  Hobart expects this to be done
by the end of 1975.
     The Hobart WTP is presently experimenting with adding
increased polymer concentrations to upgrade the existing plant
efficiency.  There is a serious problem with the method of using
pickling liquor (acid) for phosphorus removal.   The liquor
crystallizes within the piping system and has caused blockage of
piping.  The facilities have thus been inoperable  since September
1973.
7.   CROWN POINT WTP
     Crown Point has a population of about 13,000, and the town
is served by a combined sewer system.  The WTP has an existing
design capacity of 1.8 mgd,  but is awaiting federal funds for
planned expansion to a 5-mgd design capacity and implementation
of AWT in the form of polishing lagoons.
     The WTP has been achieving the required 8070 phosphorus
reduction, as these facilities have been operable  since January
of 1973.  Effluent is chlorinated and the discharge is to Beaver
Dam Creek, a tributary of Deep River.  Performance data are
given in Table D-ll.
     The combined sewers are routed to the WTP,  but in times of
extremely wet weather the increased flow rates often cause over-
flow to Beaver Dam Creek of untreated combined sewer waste water.
Sewer separation is presently underway,  and storm waters will be
routed away from the plant.
8.  SALT CREEK BASIN
     There are eight wastewater treatment plants in the Salt
Creek Basin.  The plants are listed in Table D-12.  The largest
of these is the city of Valparaiso's plant.  The location of these
plants is shown on Figure D-l.
                              D-27

-------
                                              Table D-ll

                     TOWN OF CROWN POINT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT REPORTS*
                                                1973
Daily Avg. Flow BOD (mg/1)






O
l
to
00


Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.

Jul.
Aug.
(MGD)
1.47
1.51
1.74
1.65
1.60
1.67

1.88
1.92
Raw
78
64
53
44
88
55

80
88
Final
14
15
14
10
19
11

22
18
Susp. Sol ids (mg/1)
Raw
56
70
46
63
17
85

105
109
Final
10
18
16
17
10
10

11
11
Percent Overall
BOD
82
76
73
77
78
80

72
78
Percent Purif.
SS
82
74
82
73
72
88

89
83
*Source:  Crown Point WTP Monthly Operating Reports.

-------
                                                       Table  D-12
                               SALT  CREEK BASIN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT REPORTS1
WTP
Valparaiso
South Haven Subd.
Pleasant Valley Mobile
Home Park
Robbinswood Subd.
Oak Tree Park
Design Cap.
(MGD)
6
1.4
0.080
0.078
0.063
Avg. Flow
(MGD)
3.1
0.5*
0.013*
0.026
0.017
Avg. Effluent Loadings
BOD(mg/l)
20
61
2.2
10
38
(Jan-June 1973)
NH3(mg/l)
20
20
-~
0.8
2.5

0.5
0.1
-
2.0
23.0
       Mobile Home Park
O
NS
Elmwood Mobile Home
  Park
                               0.048
0.04*
                                                                7.3
                                     1.7
                     2.3
     Sands Mobile Home
       Park
                          0.015
0.01*
                                                         14
                                     1.2
                     5.0
     Porter County Home
                          Septic Tank    0.003
                 77
14
     *Estimated.
     •'•From:   Report  of Survey - Salt Creek Watershed,  Porter County, In., July 1973,  Div. Water Pol. Control,  IBOH.

-------
       8.1  Valparaiso WTP
     The Valparaiso WTP serves in excess of 20,000 people with an
activated sludge type secondary treatment process.  Construction
completed in May 19/3, at a cost of $2.2 million,  has provided
for an expanded plant design capacity of 6 mgd.   The plant is
also providing treatment for phosphorus removal  and chlorination
of its effluent to Salt Creek.  Performance data are given in
Table  D-13.
     Advanced wastewater treatment facilities are being planned,
and are expected to be operational by 1977.
     The system of combined sewers in the Valparaiso plant's
service area has serious infiltration problems,  causing increasing
flow rates to the plant.
       8.2  South Haven Subdivision WTP
     The South Haven  Subdivision WTP has an existing 0.70 mgd
capacity but construction  is being completed to give the plant a
1.4 mgd activated sludge secondary capacity with advanced waste
treatment and chlorination facilities.  The plant will serve about
2400 lots in the South Haven and St. Michaels Subdivisions, about
165 mobile home units at Meadow View Mobile Home Park, and 560
camp sites at Camp Butternut Springs.
       8.3  Sands and Elmwood Mobile Home Park WTP
     The Sands and Elmwood Mobile Home  Parks' treatment plants
discharge  into Damon  Run which  is tributary to Salt Creek.  The
Elmwood Park WTP is an extended aeration type treatment process
with chlorination facilities.  Capacity is 48,000 gpd.  The Sands
Mobile Home Park's WTP capacity  is about 15,000 gpd and of a
similar extended aeration  type.  Effluent chlorination is provided
and a  terminal  lagoon is used.
        8.4  Pleasant  Valley Mobile Home Park
     The  Pleasant Valley Mobile Home  Park has an  80,000 gpd
                               D-30

-------
                                                Table  D-13

                             VALPARAISO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT REPORT**
                                                   1973
Daily
Avg. Flow
(MGD)
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
O
i
^ Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
4.
2.
2.
3.
3.


3.
2.
2.
0*
24
64
69
18


35
61
59
Raw
98.
110.
75.
78.
100.


76.
90.
85.
BOD (mg/1)
Final
8
3
9
1
3


9
6
2
7.
11.
9.
8.
100.


16.
13.
8.
8
8
0
3
2


5
3
8
Susp. Solids (mg/1)
Raw
173
163
102
180
145


125
146
124
Final
10
6
9
8
13


11
13
7
BOD
92
99
88
89
85


82
85
89
Percent Purif.

.2
.1
.3
.4
.8


.2
.2
.7
SS
94
96
91
95
91


92
79
94

.3
.3
.0
.4
.0


.0
.4
.4
*Estimate
**Source: Valparaiso WTP  Monthly Operating Reports.

-------
extended aeration WTP which discharges to the Squirrel Creek
tributary of Salt Creek.  This plant also provides nutrient
removal, chlorinetion and a terminal lagoon.
     8.5  Neighborhood Utilities. Inc. WTP
     Neighborhood Utilities, Inc.,  has a 78,000-gpd extended
aeration WTP on the southeast side of Portage.  It now has
phosphorus removal facilities installed for its discharge to
Salt Creek.
     8.6  Oak Tree Mobile Home Park WTP
     The Oak Tree Mobile Home Park is in the northern part of
Porter County and has a 63,000 gpd extended aeration WTP.  The
plant effluent is chlorinated, and a terminal lagoon is provided
with final discharge to Salt Creek.
     8.7  Porter County Home Septic Disposal
     The Porter County Home is served by a septic tank disposal
system which discharges to Salt Creek.  The discharge averages
about 3000 gpd.  It is the farthest upstream discharge known in
                                                  s
Salt Creek.
     8.8  Other Minor WTP and Proposed Systems
     Several other minor systems exist.  These include the
Liberty School WTP, 0.05 mgd design capacity and Liberty Farms
Mobile Home Park WTP, 0.036 mgd design capacity.  Plans for a
Lake Louise Subdivision WTP and Timber Lake Subdivision WTP with
respective 0.092 mgd and 0.150 mgd design capacities have
received preliminary approval from the Indiana Board of Health.
The planned Burns Harbor Estates WTP, 0.064 mgd, and a housing
complex at R. 36, R6W, Section 16;  0.045 mgd WTP's have not yet
been approved.
9.  THE METROPOLITAN SANITARY DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO
     The MSD has no sewage treatment plant facilities whose
discharge is tributary to Lake Michigan.  There is a combined
                               D-32

-------
sewer overflow which diverts heavy run-off flows from the 95th
St. pumping station to the Calumet River via the Howard slip.
As reported by the MSB, diversion occurred a total of 4 hr and
32 min in 1972.  This discharge is chlorinated.   During discharge
its flow in the Calumet River is assumed to be towards the Lake,
since flow to the Illinois waterway through the 0'Brian Lock is
limited.  The Chicago Water Department's Surveillance Crew has
reported that during 51 weekly Calumet Industrial Area Surveys
in 1970 the Calumet River flowed toward the Lake on 31 or 61%
of the observations at the nearby 92nd St. bridge.
10.  CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
     Both the treated municipal effluents and the combined sewer
overflows which discharge to the south Lake Michigan basin, have
a definite, detrimental effect on the quality of these waters.
     Lake Michigan is directly affected by the two combined sewer
overflows at Whiting, by the extreme pollutional loadings from
the IHC, and to a lesser extent by the pollutional loadings from
Burns Ditch.
     The water quality of the Grand Calumet River is quite
degraded as a result of the high BOD, suspended solids, ammonia-
nitrogen, phosphorus, and bacterial effluents from the Hammond,
East Chicago, and Gary Sanitary District wastewater treatment
plants.  To correct the immediate problems, pretreatment of the
industrial discharges to these plants should be required, including
back-up facilities to prevent peak loadings that can upset the
municipal treatment plants, monitoring of sources, and penalties
for excessive peak loads from industries.  If the industries
presently discharging to municipal sewers wish to discharge to
the Lake instead, then highly effective treatment should be
required of them.
     The planned advanced wastewater treatment facilities and
expansion project should be expedited to help upgrade the quality
of effluents flowing to the Lake via IHC.  More rapid funding is
                              D-33

-------
needed for this to be achieved.  Hammond SD should proceed with
a phosphorus removal process, since diversion of their effluent
to Illinois waters is unlikely to be approved.
     The high NH-j-N and bacteria concentrations in East Chicago
treatment plant effluents cannot be remedied by the existing
plant without control of ammonia and other materials coming from
steel mills.  The high level of NH3-N in the plant effluents
prevents effective chlorination with any reasonable chlorine
dosage.  High bacterial loadings in the IHC will continue until
this problem is solved.  High bacterial counts are an indication
that other pathogens may be present, and constitute a threat to
public health.
     The planned implementation of AWT and the present work
towards achieving 80% phosphorus removal in treatment plant waste
water discharges should provide for a general improvement in
water quality of the receiving waters.  Further effort is needed
(mainly by completing construction programs and monitoring
performance) to achieve phosphorus effluent requirements of 1 mg/4
gee Chapter 17 for effect of the phosphorus reductions on the
Lake.  The control or elimination of combined sewer overflows is
also needed to   provide a very definite improvement in water
quality.  Monitoring should be continuous throughout this
period of implementation of such improvements so as to document
their value and serve as an example to other areas.
     The Hammond SD should be commended for its monitoring of
its combined sewer overflows.  Other districts should be urged
to follow similar practices.
     The Gary SD should be forced to initiate a program to
eliminate its combined sewer overflows to the Grand Calumet
River,  and uo provide interim chlorination and monitoring. The
combined sewer overflow elimination project in Whiting is being
slowed by litigation opposed to the planned detention lagoon.
This issue should be settled promptly and the project completed
at the
                              D-34

-------
earliest possible time, since pollution from Whiting overflows
is evident in the Whiting area.  (See Chapter 16 in Vol. I of
this report).
     The water quality of the Little Calumet River is degraded
because of the uncontrolled combined sewer overflows from the
Hammond Sanitary District and the Highland and Griffith contract
areas.  Further planning and         funding should be expedited
to allow this situation to be remedied more quickly than it is
presently scheduled to be done.
     Deep River and its primary tributary Turkey Creek flow to
the Little Calumet River and contribute above average phosphorus,
BOD and suspended solids and coliform to Burns Ditch.  In wet
weather, high coliform counts and increases in BOD and suspended
solids levels result from treatment plant by-pass.  Those munici-
palities contributing flows should be required to do sewer infil-
tration studies and to correct the problem.
                               D-35

-------
                           REFERENCES


Combinatorics, Inc. 1974

Load allocation study of the Grand Calumet River and Indiana
Harbor Ship Canal, Report to State of Indiana, Stream Pollution
Control Board.


People of the State of Illinois and the Metropolitan Sanitary
District of Greater Chicago vs Inland Steel Co.  1974.

Testimony of Henry Bramer, and Coke Plant operating records intro-
duced as evidence.  Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois,
Judge Nathan Cohen.


Phosphorus Technical Committee, 1972

Report to Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference, U.S. EPA.


Sweeney, Dan, 1973

Citizens for a Better Environment as subcontractor to IITRI,
Information obtained by site visits and interviews with personnel
of East Chicago Sanitary District, September to December 1973.


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  1973

Pretreatment of pollutants introduced into publicly owned treat-
ment works,  Office of water program operations, Washington, D.C.


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  1974

Iron and Steel Point Source Category,  Proposed effluent limita-
tions guidelines and standards, Federal Register 39 (34), Part III,
6486-6487.
                      NT  RESEARCH INSTITUTE

                               D-36

-------