/ '
United States Office of Water june 15 1983
Environmental Protection Program Operations (WH-5v EPA/43Q^-83-002
Agency Washington, DC 20460
Water Program
xvEPA The 1982 Needs Survey
m
Conveyance, Treatment,
and Control of
Municipal Wastewater,
Combined Sewer Overflows,
and Stormwater Runoff
Summaries of Technical Data
-------
THE 1982 NEEDS SURVEY
CONVEYANCE, TREATMENT, AND CONTROL OF
MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER, COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS,
AND STORMWATER RUNOFF
SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL DATA
May 1983
Prepared for
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Program Operations (WH-595)
Washington, D.C. 20460
Contract No. 68-01-5790
.-.- ' ; ruction Agency]
***
t^s! y
, :-:-c3t .*y~
-------
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER I DESCRIPTION OF THE 1982 NEEDS SURVEY
Introduction j
Description of Categories Reported'!.".'!!!.'.'.'.'.'"!] 2
Facilities Reported !!!! 4
Present and Future Needs .'.'.'!!!!!!.' 4
Metri c Measure !!!!!!! 4
Presentation of Data !!.'.'.'.'!!!!!!!.'!!.'!." 5
CHAPTER II SUMMARIES OF TREATMENT FACILITIES TECHNICAL DATA
(CATEGORIES I, IIA, IIB) 6
CHAPTER III SUMMARIES OF CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS TECHNICAL DATA
(CATEGORIES IIIA, IIIB, IVA, IVB) 125
CHAPTER IV SUMMARIES FOR COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW AND
STORMWATER RUNOFF TECHNICAL DATA
(CATEGORIES V AND VI) 150
APPENDIX A CONDUCT OF THE SURVEY - CATEGORIES I THROUGH IV
(TREATMENT PLANTS AND SEWERS) 168
APPENDIX B CONDUCT OF THE SURVEY - CATEGORIES V AND VI
COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW (CSO) AND URBAN
STORMWATER RUNOFF (SWR) 172
APPENDIX C DESCRIPTION OF THE 1982 SURVEY FORM 177
APPENDIX D DESCRIPTION OF THE COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM WORKSHEET 183
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Treatment Facilities:
1 Number of Existing Facilities by Nature of Facility 7
2 Number of Facilities in the Year 2000 by Nature of Facility 10
3 Number and Nature of Wastewater Facilities - (Existing and
Planned - National Summary 13
4 Number and Flow by State of Treatment Plants by Design
Capacity - Existing 16
5 Number and Flow by State of Treatment Plants by Design
Capacity - (Year 2000) 18
6 Average Domestic Flows by State - Present, Projected, and
Percent Change 20
7 Average Industrial Flows by State - Present, Projected, and
Percent Change 22
8 Projected Industrial Flow to Municipal Treatment Plants by
Number, Flow, and Percent of Total Flow 24
9 Percent of Flow at All Treatment Levels - (Existing and
Planned) - National Summary 26
10 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities Existing in 1982 28
11 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities Projected for 2000 30
12 Treatment Populations - Present, Projected, Resident and
Nonresident 32
13 Septic Tank Population - Present, Projected, Resident and
Nonresident 34
14 Populations Served by Treatment with No Discharge - Present
and Projected, Resident and Nonresident 36
15 Populations Served by Raw Discharge - Present and Projected,
Resident and Nonresident 38
16 Populations Served by Facilities Designed for Less Than
Secondary Treatment - Present and Projected, Resident and
Nonresident 40
17 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities Existing in 1982 - Facilities Designed
for Less Than Secondary Treatment 42
18 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities to be in Operation in 2000 - Facilities
Designed for Less Than Secondary Treatment 44
19 Populations Served by Secondary Treatment - Present and
Projected, Resident and Nonresident 46
20 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities Existing in 1982 - Facilities Designed to
Provide Secondary Treatment 48
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table Page
21 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities Projected for 2000 - Facilities Designed
to Provide Secondary Treatment 50
22 Number of Plants Projected for Secondary Treatment by
Year 2000 - (By Total Projected Design Flow) 52
23 Number of New Secondary Treatment Plants to Be Built
Between 1982 and 2000 - (By Total Projected Design Flow) 54
24 Dollar Needs for Construction of New Secondary Treatment
Facilities, By Plant Size 56
25 Number of Facilities and Reasons for Treatment More
Stringent Than Secondary - Facilities in Year 2000 58
26 Populations Served by Advanced Secondary Treatment -
Present and Projected, Resident and Nonresident 60
27 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities in Operation in 1982 - Facilities Designed
to Provide Advanced Secondary Treatment 62
28 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities to be in Operation in 2000 - Facilities
Designed to Provide Advanced Secondary Treatment 64
29 Number of Plants Projected for Advanced Secondary Treatment
By Year 2000 - (By Total Projected Design Flow) 66
30 Number of New Advanced Secondary Treatment Plants to be
Built Between 1982 and 2000 - (By Total Projected
Design Flow) 68
31 Dollar Needs for Construction of New Advanced Secondary
Facilities, By Plant Size 70
32 Populations Served by Tertiary Treatment - Present and
Projected, Resident and Nonresident 72
33 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities in Operation in 1982 - Facilities Designed
to Provide Tertiary Treatment 74
34 Plant Loadings, Removal Efficiencies, and Discharge Rates
for Facilities to be in Operation in 2000 - Facilities
Designed to Provide Tertiary Treatment 76
35 Number of Plants Projected for Tertiary Treatment by
Year 2000 - (By Total Projected Design Flow) 78
36 Tertiary Treatment Facilities to be Built Between 1982 and
2000 - (By Total Projected Design Flow) 80
37 Dollar Needs for Construction of New Tertiary Treatment
Facilities, By Plant Size 82
38 National Dollar Needs for Changes in Existing Treatment
Plants 84
39 National Summary of Treatment Plant Upgrades for Plants
Operating in 1982 86
40 Analysis of Liquid Effluent Disposal - Number of Responses 88
41 Summary of Treatment and Sludge Handling Processes - Number
of Plants and Associated Flow - United States Total 91
m
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table Page
42 Projected Change in Treatment Process Use - Number of Plants
and Associated Flow 93
43 Distribution of Liquid Line Treatment Processes By Design
Capacity, Within EPA Regions - (Existing) 113
44 Distribution of Liquid Line Treatment Processes by Design
Capacity, Within EPA Region - (Year 2000) 115
45 Distribution of Sludge Treatment Processes By Design
Capacity, Within EPA Region - (Existing) 117
46 Distribution of Sludge Treatment Processes By Design
Capacity, Within EPA Region - (Year 2000) 119
47 Distribution of Sludge Disposal Methods By Design Capacity,
Within EPA Region - (Existing) 121
48 Distribution of Sludge Disposal Methods By Design Capacity,
Within EPA Region - (Year 2000) 123
Conveyance Systems:
49 Collection Populations - Present, Projected, Resident and
Nonresident 126
50 Total Pipe Length Needed, By Diameter 128
51 Length and Cost of Pipe Needed By the Year 2000 130
52 Dollar Needs for All Pipe Size Categories, By Diameter 132
53 Number, Capacity, and Cost of New Pump Stations 134
54 Number of Facilities Needing Collector Sewers By
Service-Area Population and Per-Capita Cost 136
55 Percent of Dollar Needs for Collector Sewers By
Service-Area Population and Per-Capita Cost 138
56 Total Estimated I/I Flow to Treatment Plants - I/I That is
Cost Effective to Remove 140
57 Required I/I Correction Actions - Facilities Where
Correction is Cost Effective 142
58 Dollar Needs For I/I Correction - Facilities Where
Correction is Cost Effective 144
59 Facilities Requiring Major Rehabilitation - By Basis of
Estimate 146
60 Dollar Needs For Major Rehabilitation By - Basis of Estimate 148
Combined Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Runoff:
61 Summary of Existing Combined Sewer Systems 151
62 Receiving Water Types For Combined Sewer Overflow 153
63 Summary of Present and Projected Urbanized Area
Characteristics 156
64 Receiving Water Types For Urban Stormwater Runoff -
Present Conditions (1970) 158
65 Receiving Water Types For Urban Stormwater Runoff -
(Year 2000 Conditions) 160
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Concluded)
Table D
Page
66 Selected Facilities For CSO Control in Urbanized Areas -
By Stream Use Objective 162
67 Selected Facilities For SWR Control in*Urbanized'Areas-
By Stream Use Objective
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
C.I EPA-1 Form Worksheet ...................................... 181
C.2 EPA-1 Form Code Reference Chart ........................... 182
D.I Combined Sewer Overflow Worksheet ......................... 192
VI
-------
CHAPTER I
DESCRIPTION OF THE 1982 NEEDS SURVEY
This chapter includes a background discussion of the 1982 Needs Survey, a
description of the Survey categories, and general information concerning
presentation of the data.
INTRODUCTION
The Needs Survey consists of a biennial survey of all wastewater conveyance
and treatment, stormwater collection and treatment, and combined sewer
overflow abatement needs for the entire country. The needs are obtained
from a national survey of each of the more than 33,000 existing and planned
publicly owned wastewater treatment works. Each need is reported as a cost
estimate in dollars for providing or satisfying the stated need.
This report is a part of the 1982 Needs Survey and is a supplement to the
cost estimate report to Congress dated, December 31, 1982. It provides
detailed summaries of the technical data collected during the Survey for
wastewater treatment and collection (Categories I through IV), combined
sewer overflow abatement (Category V), and treatment and/or collection of
stormwater (Category VI). A description of the 1982 Needs Survey
methodology is presented in Appendix A for Categories I through IV and
Appendix B for Categories V and VI.
The Needs Survey was performed in compliance with the provisions of Sections
205(a) and 516(b)(2) of the Clean Water Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and
subsequent amendments thereto. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
submitted the 1982 Needs Survey cost estimates for municipal wastewater,
combined sewer overflow, and stormwater collection and treatment needs to
Congress on December 31, 1982.
The 1982 Needs Survey is the sixth such Survey performed by EPA. After the
first two Surveys had been completed, a need became apparent to tabulate the
great amount of technical data accumulated. Responding to this need,
reports similar to this one summarizing the technical data acquired during
the Surveys were published for the 1976, 1978, and 1980 Surveys.
Historically, costs of facilities have been the primary focus for these
Surveys because they have been used by Congress to establish relative
allocations of construction grant funds among the States. Besides the cost
data, large amounts of technical data are accumulated during each Survey.
These technical data are used in many of the cost breakdowns described in
this report and have been found to be very useful to many levels of
government and quasi-government agencies and to industrial organizations.
EPA receives a large number of requests for data summaries annually from
these sources. The major purpose of this report is to provide information
commonly requested by the public. Further, this report provides valuable
information for the management and operation of the EPA Construction Grants
Program. These data are also very useful in the facilities planning process
which now must be carried out by State and local governments.
-------
The data collection process for the 1982 Needs Survey is described in
Appendix A for Categories I through IV and Appendix B for Categories V and
VI. The 1982 Needs Survey was conducted on a facility-by-facility basis for
Categories I through IV, on an area-by-area basis and facility-by-facility
basis for Category V, and on an area-by-area basis for Category VI.
Appendix C presents a copy of the EPA-1 form (Figures C.I and C.2) used to
collect information for Categories I through IV of more than 33,000 existing
and planned facilities in the United States. Appendix D presents a copy of
the combined sewer overflow worksheet (Figure D.I) used to collect
information for Category V for the 1,100 combined sewer areas in the
country. Appendices C and D also present an explanation of all items and
codes associated with both forms.
In an attempt to make the Needs Survey data base better or more useful to
the user community, comments, discussion, or suggestions for improvements
are welcomed.
DESCRIPTION OF CATEGORIES REPORTED
The categories reported in the 1982 Survey are defined as follows:
Category I - Secondary Treatment
This category includes costs for facilities to achieve secondary levels of
treatment, regardless of the treatment levels required at the facility site.
Incremental costs for treatment levels above secondary are reported in
Categories IIA and IIB. Costs for systems designed to serve individual
residences are included in Category I. Costs of outfall sewers are also
included in Category I. For purposes of the Survey, "best practicable
wastewater treatment technology" (BPWTT) and secondary treatment were
considered synonymous. Secondary treatment is defined as five day
biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids effluent concentrations of 25
mg/1 or greater but not exceeding 30 mg/1, but not less than 85 percent
removal of standard pollutants.
Category IIA - Advanced Secondary Treatment (AST)
Reported in this category are incremental costs above secondary treatment
levels to achieve advanced secondary levels of treatment for those
facilities that must achieve such levels. This requirement generally exists
where water quality standards require removal of standard pollutants at
levels greater than secondary. Standard pollutants are defined as five day
biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids. These are abbreviated as
BODg and Solids in the tables. AST would require standard pollutant removal
greater than 85 percent, or effluent limits more stringent than 25 mg/1 600.
and 25 mg/1 Solids but less than 95 percent, or effluent limits less
stringent than 9 mg/1 BOD5 and 9 mg/1 Solids. Effluent limitations between
25/25 and 30/30 mg/1 BODg/rSolids that include additional limiting parameters
for phosphorus and amnfonia (and do not require the removal of total
nitrogen) are classified as Category IIA.
-------
Category IIB - Advanced Treatment (AT)
Incremental costs above AST are reported for those facilities which require
advanced levels of treatment. This requirement generally exists where water
quality standards require removal of such pollutants as phosphorus, ammonia,
nitrates, organic materials, and other substances. In addition, this
requirement exists where removal for standard pollutants exceeds 95 percent
or where effluent limits are equal to or less than 9 mg/1 BOD5 and 9 mg/1
Solids, or where there are additional limiting parameters for ammonia and
nitrogen that require the installation of denitrification, ammonia
stripping, or ion exchange facilities. The terms advanced wastewater
treatment, AT, AWT, and tertiary treatment are considered synonymous and are
used interchangeably throughout this report.
Category IIIA - Correction of Infiltration/Inflow
Included in this category are costs for correction of sewer system
infiltration/inflow (I/I) problems. Costs for a preliminary sewer system
analysis and for a detailed Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) would also
be reported in this category.
Category 11 IB - Major Rehabilitation of Sewers
Requirements for replacement and/or major rehabilitation of existing sewer
systems are reported in this category. Costs are reported if the corrective
actions are necessary to insure the integrity of the system. Major
rehabilitation is considered to be extensive repair of existing sewers
beyond the scope of normal maintenance programs; for example, where sewers
are collapsing or structurally unsound.
Category IVA - New Collector Sewers
This category includes grant eligible costs for construction of new
collector sewer systems and appurtenances designed to correct violations
caused by raw discharges, pollution from septic tanks, and/or to comply with
Federal, State, or local actions.
Category IVB - New Interceptor Sewers
Included in this category are new interceptor sewers and transmission
pumping stations necessary for the bulk transport of wastewater.
Category V - Control of Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO)
This category includes projects designed to prevent and/or control periodic
bypassing of untreated wastes from combined sewer systems. Combined sewers
are designed to convey both sewage and stormwater.
Category VI - Treatment and/or Control of Stormwater
This category includes projects designed to abate pollution in urbanized
areas from stormwater runoff channeled through sewers and other conveyances
used only for such runoff. Stormwater channeled through combined sewers
which also carry sewage is not included in Category VI.
-------
Cost estimates for Categories I through VI are presented in "1982 Needs
Survey - Cost Estimates for Construction of Publicly-Owned Wastewater
Treatment Facilities," (430-9-82-009).
The 1982 Survey used the same cost estimate categories as were used in 1980.
In 1980, the definitions of treatment Categories I and II were changed to
more accurately reflect the incremental cost of advanced secondary treatment
(AST) and advanced wastewater treatment (AWT) projects relative to secondary
treatment costs. This change split Category II costs only and did not
affect the total needs. This convention has been used in both the 1980 and
1982 Surveys.
FACILITIES REPORTED
The 1982 Needs Survey contains the most complete inventory of publicly owned
wastewater treatment facilities. The 1982 Survey continued towards the 100
percent inventory goal set during previous Surveys. While the 1980 Survey
came very close to achieving the 100 percent inventory, over 300 facilities,
mostly small rural facilities, were identified for the first time during the
1982 Survey.
PRESENT AND FUTURE NEEDS
Two time periods pervade Needs Survey reporting. These are the present,
meaning January 1, 1982, and the future, which means the year 2000. When
dollars are used in this report, they represent January 1982 dollars. This
is true for both present and future needs.
METRIC MEASURE
All units shown in the technical summaries are in metric units. Where space
permits, English units are shown in parentheses. The following are the most
common metric units used in this report, along with the factors used to
convert to English units.
Multiply By To Obtain
Centimeters 0.3937 Inches
Hectares 2.4710 Acres
Kilometers 3,281 Feet
Liters/Capita/Day 0.2642 Gallons/Capita/Day
Meters 3.281 Feet
Metric Tons 0.9072 Short Tons
Thousand Cubic 0.2642 Million Gallons
Meters per Day per Day
-------
PRESENTATION OF DATA
For ease in interpreting the tables in this report, a discussion of each
table is presented immediately adjacent to the table. The tables summarize
various items from the data collection forms. For more detailed information
the reader is referred to Appendices C and D where explanations are given
for all items on the data collection forms.
The tables are arranged in the following general sequence:
Chapter II - Categories I. IIA, IIB
. All Levels of Treatment
. Raw Discharge
. Less Than Secondary Treatment
. Secondary Treatment
. Advanced Secondary Treatment
. Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Chapter III - Categories IIIA, IIIB. IVA. IVB
. Lengths and Sizes of New Pipe Needed
. New Pump Stations Needed
. Improvements to Existing Sewers
Chapter IV - Categories V and VI
. Combined Sewer Overflow Control
. Stormwater Runoff Control
Please refer to the Table of Contents for a listing of all tables.
-------
CHAPTER II
SUMMARIES OF TREATMENT FACILITIES TECHNICAL DATA
(CATEGORIES I, IIA, IIB)
Technical data on the municipal sewage treatment facilities in the nation
were compiled in the course of the 1982 Needs Survey. The data were
collected using the EPA-1 form which is described in detail in Appendix C.
The technical data for each treatment facility were collected at the same
time as the dollar needs. The data were obtained from several sources
including the 1980 Needs Survey files, NPDES permit files, EPA construction
grant files, and various engineering plans and reports. A further
description of the sources and methods used in collecting data for the 1982
Needs Survey is presented in Appendix A.
The technical data collected for all treatment facilities have been compiled
and are presented in the 48 tables which follow. These technical tables
include a discussion of each table presented immediately before the table.
-------
TABLE 1
NUMBER OF EXISTING FACILITIES BY NATURE OF FACILITY
Table 1 is a summary by State of the facilities in operation in 1982.
Excluded are facilities proposed to be built between 1982 and 2000 and new
facilities under construction in 1982. Facilities in operation in 1982, but
planned to be abandoned prior to 2000, are included in this summary.
The nature of a facility is recorded using a numerical code. The various
codes are defined as follows:
Code 1: A complete wastewater treatment system consisting of a treatment
plant, associated collector and/or interceptor sewers, and methods for
disposal of effluent and sludge. All components are under the control of a
single treatment authority. The collection system associated with a Code 1
facility is composed of combined sewers.
Code 2: A complete wastewater treatment system having all the components
listed under Code 1. The collection system associated with a Code 2
facility is composed of separate sanitary sewers.
Code 3: A separate treatment plant. The collection systems which discharge
to a Code 3 facility are under the control of one or more authorities.
Code 4: A municipal wastewater collection system composed of separate
sanitary sewers. This system would consist of collector sewers and/or
interceptor sewers, force mains, and pumping stations which either discharge
without treatment or discharge to a facility controlled by a different
authority. Code 4 systems handle only sanitary wastewaters.
Code 5: A municipal wastewater collection system composed of combined
sewers. This system would consist of collector sewers and/or interceptor
sewers, force mains, and pumping stations which either discharge without
treatment or discharge to a facility controlled by a different authority.
Code 5 systems handle sanitary wastewaters and stormwaters.
Code 6: Other types of systems; for example, operator training facilities.
Code 7: A system for the bulk transmission of wastewater with or without
pumping stations and with or without interceptor sewers.
Code 8: A facility which provides handling, treatment, and disposal of
sludge generated by other facilities. Included are vehicles and vehicle
fleets used to transport sludge.
Code 9: This code refers to communities where the primary method of
wastewater disposal is by means of individual onsite systems, usually septic
tank systems.
Code 0: A community septic tank system including an appurtenant collection
system.
-------
Code D: A separate intermediate treatment facility which provides partial
treatment only and discharges to another wastewater treatment facility where
additional treatment is provided.
As used in this report, combined sewers are defined as sewers which carry
both storm and sanitary wastewaters. Separate sewers carry only sanitary
wastes. Storm sewers convey only storm runoff.
-------
DECEMBER Jl.
TABLE 1
1*62
ITATt
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF EXISTING FACILITIES 1Y NATURE OF FACILITY
TOTAL (CODE U (CODE 2) (CODE J) (CODE 4) (CODE 5) (CODE «) (CODE 7) (CODE B) (CODE ») (CODE 0) (CODE D)
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA 1
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HANAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS 1
INDIANA
IOHA 1
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN 1
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI 1
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
HEN MEXICO
NEW YORK 2
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO 1
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA 2
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS 2
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WYOMING "
AMERICAN SAMOA
SUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TE*R.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 32
SI*
217
16*
7t2
.415
St7
21*
4t
1
4*2
7*2
5!
247
.45*
700
.004
t*4
47!
sst
270
440
277
.Ot*
»22
t«4
.005
202
f 17
*!
184
681
214
.0*0
657
175
.21!
75*
2**
.lot
40
44t
148
170
.t!*
261
116
750
4t!
!!{
7
5
14
10
5
.511
1
12
tl
120
1*
1
IS
0
11
24
ts
11
0
11
It
1
0
17
15
0
57
1
8
110
0
y
77
1
0
10
4
1
1
10
8
10
40
10
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
874
224
44
110
265
556
27*
8t
17
0
242
174
1!
12t
t47
22*
ttl
557
205
107
St
112
77
2*4
480
121
SIS
140
44*
4t
45
1*5
10!
!tt
502
271
580
484
It!
18
214
25!
22*
1.11!
90
5!
21!
206
54°f
108
7
2
11
f
5
14,1*3
11
0
3
0
21
2
1
0
0
5
0
1
32
1
0
0
1
0
7
7
6
11
17
t
1
0
0
2
2
20
0
16
11
0
4
1
15
1
t
0
1
17
I
0
t
if
8
o
o
o
o
0
534
48
14
1*
22
1*1
50
2*
12
0
**
1
24S
15
21
Q
47
21
43
37
77
215
133
15
17
}
t4
5
2}
257
0
11!
t*
0
151
1!
34
50*
10
71
2
20
282
56
2
80
to
4t
12!
t
0
D
Q
1
Q
0
1.733
0
0
o
0
o
o
1
1
o
o
o
o
o
2*
t
o
0
2
o
27
2
2|
2*
5
0
Q
o
0
o
5
13
0
20
0
Q
0
31
Q
g
o
0
Q
3
t
1
0
0
Q
Q
Q
0
211
1
]
1
2
0
112
1
212
171
257
455
812
11
65
10
0
177
104
1*
f4
440
101
202
221
**
24*
75
440
274
125
41t
42
101
1*
88
174
101
1,247
271
ft
155
2tO
58
1.121
*
111
81
114
1.001
151
SO
424
151
454
304
24
0
1
24
0
12,977
0
2
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 2
NUMBER OF FACILITIES IN THE YEAR 2000 BY NATURE OF FACILITY
Table 2 lists the total number of facilities by State required to satisfy
discharge requirements in the year 2000. Included are facilities that are
operational in 1982 and will remain in operation through the year 2000,
those facilities under construction in 1982, and those facilities proposed
to be built before 2000. Excluded are facilities that are operational in
1982 but are projected to be abandoned prior to the year 2000.
The nature of a facility is recorded using a numerical code. The various
codes are defined as follows:
Code 1: A complete wastewater treatment system consisting of a treatment
plant, associated collector and/or interceptor sewers, and methods for
disposal of effluent and sludge. All components are under the control of a
single treatment authority. The collection system associated with a Code 1
facility is composed of combined sewers.
Code 2: A complete wastewater treatment system having all the components
listed under Code 1. The collection system associated with a Code 2
facility is composed of separate sanitary sewers.
Code 3: A separate treatment plant. The collection systems which discharge
to a Code 3 facility are under the control of one or more authorities.
Code 4: A municipal wastewater collection system composed of separate
sanitary sewers. This system would consist of collector sewers and/or
interceptor sewers, force mains, and pumping stations which either discharge
without treatment or discharge to a facility controlled by a different
authority. Code 4 systems handle only sanitary wastewaters.
Code 5: A municipal wastewater collection system composed of combined
sewers. This system would consist of collector sewers and/or interceptor
sewers, force mains, and pumping stations which either discharge without
treatment or discharge to a facility controlled by a different authority.
Code 5 systems handle sanitary wastewaters and stormwaters.
Code 6: Other types of systems; for example, operator training facilities.
Code 7: A system for the bulk transmission of wastewater with or without
pumping stations and with or without interceptor sewers.
Code 8: A facility which provides handling, treatment, and disposal of
sludge generated by other facilities. Included are vehicles and vehicle
fleets used to transport sludge.
Code 9: This code refers to communities where the primary method of
wastewater disposal is by means of individual onsite systems, usually septic
tank systems.
10
-------
Code 0: A community septic tank system including an appurtenant collection
system.
Code D; A separate intermediate treatment facility which provides partial
treatment only and discharges to another wastewater treatment facility where
additional treatment is provided.
As used in this report, combined sewers are defined as sewers which carry
both storm and sanitary wastewaters. Separate sewers carry only sanitary
wastes. Storm sewers convey only storm runoff.
11
-------
DECEMBER 31. 1982
TABLE 2
STATE
TOTAL
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF FACILITIES IN THE YEAR 2000 BY NATURE OF FACILITY
(CODE 1) (CODE 2> (CODE 1) (CODE 4> (CODE 5) (CODE ») (CODE 7) (CODE B) (CODE ») (CODE 0) (CODE D)
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
HEN HAMPSHIRE
NEM JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
$27
236
391
756
1,459
348
216
46
1
493
795
55
246
1>438
499
964
683
478
545
267
437
277
1.068
919
667
928
202
414
91
183
679
212
2,082
865
374
1,201
759
299
2,301
40
451
348
369
2,644
283
119
744
466
654
1,001
136
1
7
4
34
30
5
0
2
1
0
12
56
115
18
3
15
0
48
9
25
62
14
0
12
16
3
0
IS
7
0
62
1
7
106
0
8
83
1
0
10
4
0
1
30
7
29
45
10
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
327
121
165
483
882
286
78
17
0
312
407
44
190
765
412
795
580
366
443
145
262
108
406
537
498
616
164
462
69
91
120
160
723
607
286
678
582
220
1.118
23
273
267
277
2,183
176
67
283
295
451
593
110
6
3
30
21
5
15
0
t
I
26
3
2
0
0
t
13
0
0
32
4
0
0
3
1
8
6
9
10
14
6
4
0
0
2
1
27
0
51
21
0
5
2
3
35
1
12
0
4
37
1
0
17
9
'!
0
0
0
0
0
95
0
30
52
279
61
57
If
0
160
181
11
23
319
86
42
26
74
73
35
86
110
328
155
104
104
3
65
11
35
398
14
645
199
2
316
38
53
821
14
155
1
80
362
78
12
181
103
»°
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
32
10
0
0
2
0
11
2
8
31
4
0
0
0
0
0
2
20
0
16
0
0
10
0
2
26
1
0
0
o
0
o
t
4
7
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
o
26
0
Q
1
o
I
o
o
0
1
1
o
o
o
o
o
2
2
1
o
o
0
o
o
o
2
o
o
4
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
o
Q
o
o
Jl
o
Q
o
o
o
o
g
o
o
o
o
o
2
Q
4
o
o
11
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
g
o
4
Q
o
o
g
o
4
o
I
g
g
5
g
Q
2
0
{
g
0
0
0
0
U.S. TOTALS 32,383
19,569
414
195
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
88
110
190
220
420
14
53
2
0
11
185
0
IB
228
70
127
74
14
26
11
66
7
208
183
57
191
18
86
9
2
106
38
547
34
77
84
135
13
209
0
10
70
4
55
27
3
247
17
37
144
10
0
4,565
0
3
0
0
6
0
13
1
0
0
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
1
0
5
4
6
8
12
0
0
1
0
0
32
0
0
26
3
2
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
0
4
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
154
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
-------
TABLE 3
NUMBER AND NATURE OF WASTEWATER FACILITIES
(EXISTING AND PLANNED)
NATIONAL SUMMARY
Table 3 is a two part table. The upper table is a condensation of Tables 1
and 2 into a national summary. A facility is included in the Existing
category if it was operational in 1982. A facility listed as To Be
Abandoned was operational in 1982 and is expected to be phased out by 2000.
A facility listed as Under Construction was in the process of being built in
1982. A facility in the To Be Built category was not in operation or under
construction in 1982 but is projected to be operational by 2000. The Total
row lists the total number of facilities expected to be in operation in the
year 2000.
It should be noted that the values listed in the various columns are not
additive. For example, the Sewer Systems column lists 27,267 facilities in
the Total or year 2000 row. However, by starting with the Existing row and
performing the indicated additions (To be Built and Under Construction) and
subtractions (To be Abandoned), the resulting value would be ,27,468. This
difference of 201 facilities arises because of the special or unusual
situations encountered in the course of data collection and are sometimes
difficult to describe using the limited coding available in the Survey.
The lower table summarizes the nature of projected changes to existing
wastewater treatment plants. Only treatment plants in operation in 1982 are
included. A brief explanation of the projected change categories follows:
Enlarge: The hydraulic capacity of a plant will be increased while the
degree of treatment the plant will be capable of achieving will remain the
same.
Upgrade: The degree of treatment that a plant is capable of achieving will
be improved but hydraulic capacity will remain the same.
Enlarge and Upgrade: Both the hydraulic capacity of a plant will be
increased and the degree of treatment the plant is capable of achieving will
be improved.
Replace: This describes the situation when an existing plant is demolished
and a completely new plant is constructed on the same site.
Abandon: The treatment plant is taken out of operation and abandoned, and
the sewage is diverted to another facility for treatment.
No Change: This category is for plants that will remain essentially
unchanged through the year 2000.
Other: A number of situations are covered by this category. One common
situation is a treatment plant which will require a capital expenditure,
such as for a new sludge digester, but the degree of treatment and hydraulic
capacity will not be changed.
13
-------
Abandon, Retain Sewers: This change is indicated when an authority that
operates a treatment plant and a collection system takes the treatment plant
out of operation and continues to operate the collection system. The sewage
is diverted to a treatment plant operated by a different authority. This
situation usually occurs when a regional treatment plant is constructed to
serve several communities.
14
-------
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER AND NATURE OF HASTEMATER FACILITIES
(EXISTING AND PLANNED)
NATIONAL SUMMARY
DECEMBER II,
TABLE 3
19BZ
EXISTING:
TO BE ABANDONED!
UNDER CONSTRUCTIONI
TO BE BUILTi
TOTAL l
TREATMENT
PLANTS
15,431
1,477
447
6,627
21.027
INTERNED.
PLANTS
15
1
2
1
32
NUMBER OF
SEWER
SYSTEMS
19,041
296
587
8,136
27.267
FACILITIES
SLUDGE
FACILITIES
6
1
2
4
11
TRUNK
SEWERS
26
0
3
IS
44
ONSITE
SYSTEMS
12,977
8,412
0
0
4,565
OTHER
112
82
0
15
50
»»«*»«M*i
-------
TABLE 4
NUMBER AND FLOW BY STATE OF TREATMENT PLANTS BY DESIGN CAPACITY
(EXISTING)
Table 4 is a flow summary of all treatment plants in operation in 1982.
Excluded are treatment plants projected to be built and treatment plants
under construction in 1982. A summary is provided for each State and U.S.
Territory. National totals are summarized at the bottom of the table.
In the second column the total number of existing treatment plants in each
State is reported. Column three represents the total wastewater treatment
capacity of the plants in thousand cubic meters per day. The present design
flow for each plant was used to calculate the total treatment capacity
value. The present design flow may be equal to, greater, or less than the
existing flow for any particular plant.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the State totals into five flow
ranges. The ranges specified in the column headings are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses under the headings, in
million gallons per day. Reported for each flow range are, the number of
plants in the range and their total treatment capacity (M /day x 1,000).
Also reported is the percentage of the total State treatment capacity that
is accounted for by each flow range.
These data are for all types of treatment plants regardless of level of
treatment. Numerous other tables follow which provide summaries by level of
treatment for both existing plants and projected plants.
The data indicate nearly 80 percent of the treatment plants in operation in
1982 have a design capacity less than or equal to 1.05 mgd (4 x 10 M /day).
These small plants account for 8.3 percent of the total U.S. wastewater
treatment capacity. The data also indicate 0.6 percent of the treatment
plants in operation, in> 1982 have a design capacity greater than or equal to
50.2 mgd (1.9 x 10 M /day). These large plants account for 39 percent of
the total U.S. wastewater treatment capacity.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the number of
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. This occurs
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value is less
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
16
-------
DECEMBER 31,
TABLE 4
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER AND FLOM BY STATE OF TREATMENT PLANTS BY DESI6N CAPACITY
(EXISTING)
CUBIC METERS PER
(MILLION GALLONS
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
DAY X 10001
PER DAY)I
TOTAL
t OF TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
237 1,728
48 225
113 1,168
285 1,030
589 12,700
282 1,697
102 2.071
21 434
1 1.169
246 4,306
387 3,011
33 639
140 552
740 10,920
353 3,936
681 1,539
560 1,273
222 1,308
307 1,907
96 527
148 2,055
110 4.033
372 6,728
510 2.044
324 992
550 3,254
157 417
452 1,010
48 674
66 487
228 4,909
103 453
463 11,656
516 2,608
279 166
696 7,051
485 1,221
206 1,691
639 6,662
20 648
240 1.351
263 272
234 2,566
1.352 7,561
92 1,053
85 230
235 2,453
244 2,219
146 640
562 3.471
109 193
2 4
7 99
2 4
32 412
6 12
5 36
mmmi o-
(0-
.40 «««««« «« .401-4.0 «« « 4.001-40 «"«« «»« 40.001-190 ««« ««»« 190+ ««««
.105) (.106-1. OS) (1.06-10.5) (10.57-50.2) (50.24-)
X OF X OF X OF X OF X OF
t OF TOTAL STATE t OF TOTAL STATE OF TOTAL STATE * OF TOTAL STATE t OF TOTAL STATE
PLANTS
24
27
39
78
135
118
8
4
0
16
90
6
62
170
52
375
318
40
63
16
46
8
68
243
96
241
80
316
15
8
12
39
65
241
230
195
244
42
103
0
42
182
"11
22
74
53
27
245
42
0
1
0
0
2
1
FLOW FLOM PLANTS FLOW FLOM PLANTS FLOM FLOW PLANTS FLOM FLOW PLANTS FLOM FLOW
6 0. 146 235 13. 60 799 46.2 7 687 39.7 0 0 0.0
3 1. 13 19 8. 7 73 32.7 1 128 56.9 0 0 0.0
6 0. 53 84 7. 16 172 14.7 4 450 38.5 1 454 38.8
20 2. 156 203 19. 47 552 53.5 4 253 24.6 0 0 0.0
26 0. 237 371 2. 166 2.361 18.5 39 3.059 24.0 12 6.881 54.
25 1. 116 181 10. 41 437 25.7 6 409 24.1 1 643 37.
2 0. 31 65 3. 50 835 40.3 12 941 45.4 1 227 10.
0 0. 12 21 5. 4 71 14.4 0 0 0.0 1 340 78.
DO. 0 00. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 1.169 99.
3 0. 99 194 4. 112 1,688 39.2 15 1,473 34.2 4 946 21.
18 0. 206 325 10. 74 934 31.0 16 1,277 42.4 1 454 15.0
10. 9 16 2. 16 216 33.9 1 94 14.7 1 310 48.5
13 2. 54 73 13. 20 242 43.8 4 223 40.4 0 0 0.0
42 0. 408 540 4. 134 1,613 14.7 23 1.587 14.5 5 7,136 65.3
15 0. 217 287 7. 61 718 18.2 19 1,533 38.9 4 1,381 35.0
75 4. 252 262 17. 46 512 33.3 8 689 44.7 0 0 0.0
60 4. 201 249 19. 37 521 40.9 4 442 34.7 0 0 0.0
10 0. 138 170 13. 39 458 35.0 4 272 20.8 1 397 30.3
12 0. 172 277 14. 44 710 37.2 7 445 23.3 1 461 24.2
2 0. 45 70 13. 32 295 55.9 3 159 30.1 0 0 0.0
8 0. 65 90 4. 28 428 20.8 7 467 22.7 2 1,059 51.5
1 0. 37 73 1. 49 631 15.6 11 953 23.6 5 2.373 58.8
18 0. 198 273 4. 84 859 12.7 19 1,862 27.6 3 3,713 55.1
50 2. 221 256 12. 39 426 20.8 6 485 23.7 1 825 40.3
24 2. 188 247 24. 38 470 47.4 2 249 25.1 0 0 0.0
49 1. 245 354 10. 56 610 18.7 5 505 IS. 5 3 1,733 53.2
13 3. 63 82 19.7 12 162 38.9 2 158 38.0 0 0 0.0
46 4. 112 123 12.2 21 261 25.8 2 302 29.9 1 276 27.3
2 0. 21 29 4.3 9 75 11.1 2 227 33.6 1 340 50.4
1 0. 37 59 12.2 18 210 43.1 3 215 44.2 0 0 0.0
2 0. 95 186 3.7 100 1,319 26.8 17 1,610 32.8 4 1,790 36.4
7 1. 41 67 14.7 22 231 51.0 1 147 32.5 0 0 0.0
14 0. 229 362 3.1 133 1,768 15.1 21 1.989 17.0 15 7.521 64.5
22 0. 166 265 10.1 98 1,454 55.7 11 865 33.1 0 0 0.0
27 16.2 40 37 22.3 9 102 61.4 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
38 0.5 334 476 6.7 139 1,772 25.1 20 1,671 23.6 8 3,092 43.8
46 3.8 191 243 19.9 47 588 48.2 3 342 28.0 0 0 0.0
9 0.5 111 164 9.7 45 556 32.9 7 581 34.3 1 378 22.3
19 0.2 334 541 8.1 186 2.306 34.6 10 875 13.1 6 2.918 43.8
0 0.0 6 8 1.2 10 176 27.2 3 221 34.1 1 242 37.3
10 0.7 135 198 14.7 57 704 52.1 6 438 32.4 0 0 0.0
29 10.8 69 70 24.0 12 171 63.1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
6 0.2 137 211 8.2 61 474 26.3 5 513 20.0 3 1,158 45. 1
81 1.0 679 1,027 13.5 216 2,447 32.3 26 1,959 25.9 5 2 044 27.0
4 0.4 38 52 4. 26 386 36.7 6 609 57.8 0 0 0.0
4 2.0 46 70 30. 17 155 67.4 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
15 0.6 110 146 5. 33 413 16.8 16 1,408 57.3 469 19.1
12 .5 120 179 8. 62 793 35.7 8 760 34.2 473 21.3
7 .1 91 123 19. 24 220 34.5 4 288 45.1 0 0.0
53 .5 241 332 9. 59 452 IB. 7 14 1,000 31.1 1.353 38. 9
9 .7 34 42 22. 13 141 73.2 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
0 .0 2 4 99. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 .0 48 8.5 0 0 0.0 2 90 91.3 0 0 0.0
0 .0 24 99.9 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 .0 20 31 7.7 7 66 16.0 5 314 76.2 0 0 0.0
0 .2 4 11 93.7 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 .2 0 0 0.0 4 36 99.7 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
U.S. TOTALS
15.431 133,503 5,120
991 0.7 7,031 10,112 7.5 2.740 34,500 25.8
421 35,327 26.4
99 52,570 39.3
17
-------
TABLE 5
NUMBER AND FLOW BY STATE OF TREATMENT PLANTS BY DESIGN CAPACITY
(YEAR 2000)
Table 5 is a flow summary of all treatment plants projected to be in
operation in the year 2000. Excluded are plants that were operational in
1982 and are projected to be abandoned by 2000.
The projected design flow was used to calculate the total treatment capacity
value. All other computations used to prepare this table are directly
comparable to the methods used to prepare Table 4.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
The data indicate nearly 82 percent of the treatment plants projected to be
operational Jn .2000 will have a design capacity less than or equal to 1.05
mgd (4 x 10 M /day). These small plants will account for 8.1 percent of
the total U.S. wastewater treatment capacity. The data also indicate 0.6
percent of the treatment plants projected to be operational in ^OOJD will
have a design capacity greater than or equal to 50.2 mgd (1.9 x 10 M /day).
These large plants will account for 40 percent of the total U.S. wastewater
treatment capacity.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the number of
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. This occurs
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value is less
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
18
-------
DCCEHICI SI, 1*82
TA»Li S
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER AND FIOM IV STATE OF TREATMENT PLANTS BY DESIGN CAPACITY
(YEA* 2000)
CUBIC METERS PER
(MILLION GALLONS
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COl'JM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HANAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEN HAMPSHIRE
MEN JERSEY
NFN MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
HASHINGTOH
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
HYOH1NG
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
DAY X 1000 t
PER DAY).
TOTAL
0 OF TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
S42 5.07*
124 54*
170 1,55*
484 1,215
,17 15.412
2*1 2,058
105 2.044
22 (88
1 1.14*
51* 4, ,55
428 5,717
44 47*
205 704
857 12.555
551 4,157
815 1,7(4
(85 1.41*
185 l.*74
444 2,471
204 447
281 2,574
148 4,7,*
484 7,4*4
(77 2,441
(04 1,544
452 5.4(0
181 455
445 1.058
71 805
142 802
1(4 (.5(1
140 4*7
844 14.072
452 5.545
2*5 214
7*0 8.240
(84 1.524
251 l.*14
1.241 8,212
25 824
285 1,77*
2.!t! .rill
178 1,522
102 271
507 5,140
557 2,841
4*» 1,04*
425 5,874
112 514
1 25
*i tin
iUO
5 20
51 1,504
21 57
5 51
«...
(
* OF
PLANTS
80
fO
58
24*
54*
184
10
4
0
25
**
2
285
1*5
4*8
540
154
140
85
154
IS
118
504
281
511
*5
517
54
41
2
82
275
52*
258
275
517
42
405
5
80
1*4
1,002
54
,0
100
175
244
£2
0-.40 ......
0-.105)
X OF
TOTAL STATE
FLON FLOH
15 l!s
8 O.S
SO 4.1
o o!o
( 0.0
1* .7
45 .5
42 .0
87 .*
(8 .1
54 .8
55
14 2.
2 o!
2* 0.
(* 2.
48 5.
(1 *!»
7 0.*
10 1.2
0 0.0
14 2.4
28 11.4
(7 .7
14 .7
88 .0
1 .1
14 .*
2* ,.2
14 0.4
175 1.7
18 1.5
7 2.4
1* 0.4
25 0.8
40 5.8
55 1.5
7 2 S
o o.'o
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
.... .401-4.0 .... «... 4.001-40 «... ... 40.001-1*0 ... ...... 1*0+ ......
C. 104-1. OS) (1.04-10.5) (10.57-50.2) (58. 2»)
' "^ X OF X OF x or
0 OF TOTAL STATE * OF TOTAL STATE * OF TOTAL STATE * OF TOTAL STATE
PLAHTS FLON FLOH PLANTS FLOH FLOW PLANTS FLOH FLON PLANTS FLOH FLOH
"J **» 7- " «» «.» »» »»2 52.2 2 ,61 51.2
" *» 1- IS 170 44.1 1 1(4 42.5 0 0.0
»7 144 ». 2* 50$ K.B 5 (11 55.2 (47 54.8
1(7 1*2 15. (2 (82 47.* 4 5*0 52.0 0 0.0
540 478 5. 174 2.570 l,.l 40 5,055 22.7 7,25* (5 *
»» »«« SS 5*4 2*. 2 7 (55 27.1 700 54!s
f» ** * S2 ,1, 44.5 11 84* 42.0 227 10.*
« " « * »S 4.0 2 140 25.7 584 45.5
154 204 ?' Itl ° °-° « 0.0 1,14, .»
21ft in* A " * " 9 5 2»4i7 55.4 2*492 35*8
" ** « « '"» »4a 1 ' »4 is!* 510 45!*
77 " >4. 25 25* 54.4 4 52* 44.5 0 00
254 284 *' U" l>7>* "'* " *'*" "'* *>MS *5>*
254 284 14. (2 (47 u!l » *815 44.'* * ' "J ".'o
1*2 21* 15. 44 414 45.2 4 52* 25.2 1*4 llig
lii n " M ** *7-* *** »-7 "« *»'*
* >» >« " 518 4*. 2 4 202 51.2 0 0.0
87 125 5.1 24 5,7 14.7 10 744 51. 5 1,085 45.4
,11 ,11 '' ** *07 18'» " 1>117 " *«" S5.5
254 5(8 4.7 *1 ,81 15.1 17 1>7,z ZJ.5 » Jt, MiJ
225 277 U. 45 4*8 20.2 4 (28 21.4 1 0*7 44 S
III III 11' I1 *" **' * '** "'* *" "'
70 »0 1*. 14 1*0 41.' 8 2 'l58 S4.'a l'*'o *0.'fl
120 154 12. 24 274 25.* 5 555 51.5 244 25.0
fj " 5. 12 15* 17.2 2 2*5 54.4 540 42.2
* * »» 2* 524 40.4 5 174 21.* 1*4 24.5
f» * > »T »'*»4 25.4 21 1.5S1 2».0 2.440 45.*
S4 85 12. 25 507 44.0 0 0 O.P 28, 41.5
184 278 8. 100 l!(87 4?!l 1* l!*»7 4l!4 '"J *Jio
47 42 1*. 10 145 44.4 0 0 0.0 000
J" 424 S. 157 2,104 25.4 27 2,047 25.0 5.405 45.4
fJi fi! "' *° 5" *»-° * S« ".i 227 14.8
117 "S ». 44 417 52.2 7 72* 58.0 578 1».7
5*0 858 10. 250 2,485 52.4 12 1,051 12. ( 5. (70 45.4
122 17* *'7 " '** "'7 * *51 *Z<* SB2 **'7
ill ..ijj :|;| | !.'8| liii J 2.111 ill! ml II
57 '' S.S 25 507 25.2 5 5,1 44.7 111 25.1
47 47 24.4 1, 1*7 72.4 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
J" *» « 45 515 14.5 20 1,757 (5.4 442 20.*
281 572 55. 5* 540 54.5 4 274 It'. 2 ' 0 o!o
175 *? «7 787 20.5 14 1,105 28. ( 1,(42 5*. 7
»* 40 12. 14 200 45. S 1 4> 21.5 0 0.0
» 0 0. 25 »,., 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
» 5 5. 4 4.0 2 *0 ,0.2 0 0.0
1 0 4. 1* ,5.4 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
7 >» >-S 1 200 15.* 8 804 41.7 272 20.8
14 17 44.5 1* (0.* 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
1 0 1.7 50 »8.2 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
U.S. TOTALS
21.027 141.778 8,701 1.454 1.0 8.440 11.5*4 7.1 5.215 40.445 25.1 524 42.455 24.2 12* 45.444 40.4
19
-------
TABLE 6
AVERAGE DOMESTIC FLOWS BY STATE
PRESENT, PROJECTED, AND PERCENT CHANGE
Table 6 summarizes the present (1982) and projected (2000) quantity of flow
treated by publicly owned treatment plants that is from domestic sources. A
similar summary dealing with flow from industrial sources is presented in
Table 7.
A further explanation of these summaries is presented below:
Actual: All flows reported in this category were compiled from the actual
average daily flow received at treatment works during the most recent 12
month period for which information is available. Flows reported in this
category were compiled from records collected between late 1980 and early
1982. The major source of flow information was the self-monitoring reports
that are completed by every facility with an NPDES permit.
Present Design: All flows reported in this category were compiled from the
average daily flow a treatment plant is designed to handle. The design
capacity reported was the capacity in place in 1982.
Projected Design: All flows reported in this category were compiled from
the average daily flow that a treatment plant will be designed to handle in
2000.
Total Flow: The total flow is expressed in thousand cubic meters per day.
Total flow is defined as all wastewaters moving through the treatment plant
from all sources including domestic, commercial, industrial, and
infiltration/inflow.
Domestic Flow: The domestic flow is expressed in thousand cubic meters per
day. For this table domestic flow includes all wastewaters moving through
the treatment plant from all sources except industrial sources.
Liters/Capita/Day: These values were calculated using the domestic flow and
the total resident and nonresident population. The actual number of
residents and nonresidents receiving treatment in 1982 was used in the
Actual and Present Design categories. The number of residents and
nonresidents a treatment plant will be capable of serving in the year 2000
was used in the Projected Design category.
Percent Change: This category presents a comparison between the present
situation (1982) and the projected situation (2000). The change in each
parameter between the present design and the projected design is expressed
as an increase or decrease using the present design as the base.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
20
-------
DECEMBER SI,
TABLE 6
1982
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
AVERAGE DOMESTIC FLOWS 8V STATE
PRESENT, PROJECTED AND PERCENT CHAN6E
(THOUSANDS OF CUBIC HETERS PER DAY)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
NAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAK
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
TOTAL
FLOW
1,334
159
817
672
9,060
1.279
1.317
322
1,169
4,377
2,033
395
367
8,025
3,618
1,152
851
998
1,239
379
1,401
3.253
5.209
1,632
752
2,260
256
660
398
305
4,258
345
9,124
1,719
141
5,626
746
1,195
5,531
484
859
202
1,799
6,287
812
180
1.697
1,610
388
2,320
174
1
34
2
517
1
24
101,794
DON. LITERS /
FLOW CAP. /DAY
1,118
145
790
539
7,562
1,084
1,089
181
1.169
4.128
1.647
357
324
6.500
3.058
951
728
756
1.193
298
1.187
2.489
4.080
1,178
638
1,859
249
528
397
230
3,446
320
8,278
1,165
130
4,611
699
946
4,771
327
606
174
1,314
163
1,418
1.415
326
1.739
173
1
34
2
468
24
85,374
S12
712
351
416
376
380
563
333
621
664
488
549
633
657
824
443
394
423
413
486
485
637
577
390
433
447
504
419
506
542
514
349
593
438
294
541
375
637
503
498
407
372
593
398
545
390
513
503
1,061
448
266
111
298
504
TOTAL
FLOW
1,728
225
1,168
1,030
12.700
1.697
2.071
434
1,169
4,306
3,011
639
552
10,920
3,936
1,539
1.273
1.308
1,907
527
2.055
4.033
6.728
2,044
992
3,254
417
1.010
674
487
4.909
453
11.656
2.6U8
166
7,051
1.221
1.691
6.662
648
1.351
272
2.566
7,561
1,053
230
2,453
2,219
640
3.471
193
4
99
4
412
36
133.503
PRESENT DESIGN "
DON.
FLOW
1,487
207
1,114
912
10,502
1,464
1,627
2?0
1,169
3.985
2.394
605
480
9,017
3,140
1,266
1,076
973
1,857
414
1,842
3,006
5,246
1.527
897
2.527
407
833
672
374
4,423
429
10,420
1,859
154
5,677
1,159
1.387
5.7*2
467
1,075
241
1.901
6, 9'4
925
216
2,017
1,957
584
2,468
193
4
99
4
363
12
36
112.089
LITERS /
CAP. /DAY
681
1,016
494
704
523
514
842
532
621
641
710
931
939
911
846
590
583
545
643
676
752
770
742
505
610
608
824
662
856
881
660
467
747
699
349
666
623
934
608
710
721
515
859
562
H*
566
753
697
728
562
2,723
1,296
2,957
206
1 , 078
448
662
« PROJECTED DESIGN null
TOTAL
FLOW
3,079
369
1.539
1,215
13,412
2,038
2.064
588
1.169
6,955
3,717
679
706
12,335
4,157
1,754
1,419
1,974
2.471
647
2.376
4,799
7,496
2,461
1,364
3,450
455
1,058
805
802
5,351
697
14,072
3,365
214
8,260
1,524
1.914
8,212
824
1.779
317
3,401
I,'!!!
2.861
1,049
3,876
316
23
100
20
1,306
37
51
161.778 1
DOM. LITERS /
FLOW CAP. /DAY
2.705
350
1.474
1,042
11,119
1,799
1.663
427
1.169
6,558
2,993
626
628
10,138
3,274
1,427
1,207
1,511
2.345
526
2,028
3,597
5,857
1.810
1,229
2.672
441
809
784
621
4,065
666
12,519
2,334
195
6,525
1.393
1,624
7.149
567
1.291
279
2,463
9.230
1.142
243
2,588
2,480
926
2,799
305
12
100
20
1,064
37
51
34.925
741
516
348
417
402
393
544
400
520
464
496
452
563
836
623
491
475
465
478
526
474
613
647
473
522
443
602
469
526
616
442
431
628
481
337
536
420
523
552
5Sf
400
414
563
448
530
579
428
516
443
567
481
380
476
634
328
356
391
51 l
««««« PERCENT CHANGE ««««»
TOTAL
FLOW
+78.1
+63.4
+31.7
+ 18.0
+5.6
+20.0
-0.3
+35.4
+0.0
+61.5
+23.4
+6.2
+27.8
+ 12.9
+5.5
+13.9
+ 11.4
+50.8
+29.5
+22.5
+ 15.6
+ 18.9
+ 11.4
+20.3
+37.4
+6.0
+9.2
+4.7
+19.4
+64.5
+9.0
+53.7
+20.7
+29.0
+28.6
+ 17.1
+24.7
+13.2
+23.2
+27.1
+31.7
+ 16.4
+32.5
+ 33.2
+25.5
+ 17.8
+28.8
+28.9
+63.9
+11.6
+63.1
+425.1
+ 1.1
+318.3
+217.1
+213.1
+40.1
A91 1
DOM.
FLOW
+81.8
+68.7
+32.3
+ 14.2
+ 5.8
+22.8
+2.2
+47.1
+0.0
+64.5
+25.0
+3.4
+30.9
+ 12.4
+4.2
+ 12.7
+ 12.2
+55.2
+26.2
+27.0
+ 10.1
+ 19.6
+ 11.6
+ 18.5
+ 36.9
+5.7
+8.4
-2.8
+ 16.6
+65.8
-8.0
+55.2
+20.1
+25.5
+26.4
+ 14.9
+20.2
+ 17.0
+24.0
+21.5
+20.1
+ 15.8
+29.5
+ 33.3
+23.3
+ 12.6
+28.3
+26.7
+58.6
+ 13.4
+ 57.
+179.6
+ 1.1
+318.3
+193.1
+214.4
+40.1
LITERS /
CAP. /DAY
+8.7
-49 .2
-29.5
-40.7
-23.1
-23.4
-35.3
-24.8
-16.2
-27.5
-30.0
-51.4
-39.9
-8.3
-26.4
-16.7
-18.5
-14.6
-25. 7
-22.1
-36.9
-20.3
-12.7
-6.4
-14.3
-27.1
-26.8
-29.1
-38.5
-30.1
-32.9
-7.7
-15.9
-31.1
-3.5
-19.4
-32.5
-44.0
-9.2
-17.1
-44.5
-19.6
-34.4
-20. J
-23.3
-29.9
-24.4
-31.4
-36.4
-22.0
-14. J
-86.0
-63.2
-78.5
+58.8
-66.9
-12.7
+21.1
+20.3
NOTES, 1. FLOWS IN CUBIC METERS X 1000 2. SUM OF ENTRIES NAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUNO-OFFS
21
-------
TABLE 7
AVERAGE INDUSTRIAL FLOWS BY STATE
PRESENT, PROJECTED, AND PERCENT CHANGE
Table 7 summarizes the present (1982) and projected (2000) quantity of flow
treated by publicly owned treatment plants that is of industrial origin.
This table is an extension of the summary presented in Table 6.
A further explanation of these sunmaries is presented below:
Actual: All flows reported in this category were compiled from the actual
average daily flow received at treatment works during the most recent 12
month period for which information is available. Flows reported in this
category were compiled from records collected between late 1980 and early
1982. The major source of flow information was the self-monitoring reports
that are completed by every facility with an NPDES permit.
Present Design: All flows reported in this category were compiled from the
average daily flow a treatment plant is designed to handle. The design
capacity reported was the capacity in place in 1982.
Projected Design: All flows reported in this category were compiled from
the average daily flow that a treatment plant will be designed to handle in
the year 2000.
Total Flow; The total flow is expressed in thousand cubic meters per day.
Total flow is defined as all wastewaters moving through the treatment plant
from all sources including domestic, commercial, industrial, and
infiltration/inflow.
Industrial Flow: This includes only wastewater generated by industry.
Excluded were flows originating from domestic sources, commercial users, and
infiltration/inflow.
Percent Change; This category presents a comparison between the present
situation (1982) and the projected situation (2000). The change in each
parameter between the present design and the projected design is expressed
as an increase or decrease using the present design as the base.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
22
-------
DECEMBER 31. 1982
TABLE 7
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
AVERAGE INDUSTRIAL FLOWS BV STATE
PRESENT, PROJECTED AND PERCENT CHANGE
(THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY)
«..«...« ACTUAL ....... ... PRESENT DESIGN .... «... PROJECTED DESIGN ...
»* PERCENT CHANGE ..
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I DM A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
11 t TftT A 1 *
TOTAL
FLOW
1.334
159
617
672
9.060
1,279
1,317
322
1,169
4,377
2,033
395
367
8,025
3,618
1.152
851
998
1,239
379
1,401
3,253
5,209
1,632
752
2,260
256
660
398
305
4,258
345
9,124
1,719
141
5,626
746
1,195
5,531
484
859
202
1.799
6,287
812
180
1,697
1,610
388
2,320
174
1
34
2
517
1
24
IND.
FLOW
216
14
26
132
1,497
194
227
140
0
249
386
38
43
1,524
560
201
123
242
46
80
214
763
1,128
454
113
401
7
132
0
75
812
24
845
554
11
1,014
46
249
760
156
252
28
484
655
98
16
279
194
61
580
j
0
0
g
48
0
0
IND.
X
16.2
9.0
3.2
19.7
16.5
15.2
17.3
43.6
0.0
5.6
19.0
9.7
11.9
18.9
15.4
17.4
14.5
24.2
3.7
21.2
15.2
23.4
21.6
27.8
15.1
17.7
2.7
19.9
0.0
24.6
19.0
7.2
9.2
32.2
8.2
18.0
6.2
20.8
13.7
32.3
29.4
13.9
26.9
10.4
12.1
8.9
16.4
12.0
15.7
25.0
0.7
0.0
0 . 0
On
. u
9.4
0.0
0.0
TOTAL
FLOW
1,728
225
1,168
1,030
12,700
1,697
2.071
434
1,169
4,306
3,011
639
552
10,920
3,936
1,539
1,273
1.308
1.907
527
2,055
4.033
6.728
2.044
992
3,254
417
1.010
A »*
ft f H
487
4,909
453
11,656
2,608
166
7,051
1,221
1,691
6,662
648
I.iSl
272
2,566
7,561
1,053
230
2,453
2,219
640
3,471
193
£
1
99
4
412
« 5
1 £
36
IND.
FLOW
240
18
54
118
2,197
233
444
144
0
321
616
34
72
1.903
796
273
197
334
49
113
213
1,026
1,482
517
94
727
10
176
1
113
485
24
1,236
749
12
1.374
62
304
899
181
275
30
664
636
127
14
435
262
56
1,003
0
0
0
0
48
0
0
IND.
X
13.9
8.1
4.6
11.4
17.3
13.7
21.4
33.1
0.0
7.4
20.4
5.3
13.0
17.4
20.2
17.7
15.5
25.5
2.5
21.5
10.3
25.4
22.0
25.3
9.5
22.3
2.4
17.5
0.2
23.1
9.8
5.3
10.6
28.7
7.3
19.4
5.0
17.9
13.5
27.9
20.4
11.3
2S.8
8.4
1^.1
6.2
17.7
11.8
8.7
28.8
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.8
0.6
0.0
TOTAL
FLOW
3,079
369
1.539
1.215
13,412
2,038
2,064
588
1,169
6.955
3,717
679
706
12,335
4,157
1,754
1,419
1,974
2,471
647
2.376
4,799
7,496
2,461
1,364
3,450
455
1,058
805
802
5.351
697
14.072
3,365
214
8,260
1.524
1.914
8.212
824
1,779
317
3,401
10,072
1,322
271
3,160
2,861
1,049
3,876
316
23
100
20
1.306
37
51
IND.
FLOW
374
19
64
173
2.293
239
401
161
0
397
723
53
77
2,197
882
326
211
463
125
120
347
1,202
1,638
651
134
777
14
249
20
181
1,285
31
1,552
1,031
19
1.735
130
290
1.062
256
488
37
938
642
180
28
572
381
122
1,076
10
10
0
0
241
0
0
IND.
X
12.1
5.1
4.2
14.2
17.1
11.7
19.4
27.4
0.0
5.7
19.4
7.8
11.0
17.8
21.2
18.6
14.9
23.4
5.0
18.6
14.6
25.0
21.8
26.4
9.8
22.5
3.1
23.5
2.5
22.5
24.0
4.4
11.0
30.6
8.9
21.0
8.5
15.1
12.9
31.1
27.4
11.8
27.5
8.3
13.6
10.4
18.0
13.3
11.7
27.7
3.4
46.7
0.0
0.0
18.5
0.1
0.0
TOTAL
FLOW
+78.1
+63.4
+ 31.7
+ 18.0
+ 5.6
+20.0
-0.3
+ 35.4
+ 0.0
+61.5
+23.4
+ 6.2
+ 27.8
+12.9
+5.5
+ 13.9
+ 11.4
+ 50.8
+ 29.5
+ 22.5
+ 15.6
+ 18.9
+ 11.4
+20.3
+ 37.4
+6.0
+ 9.2
+4.7
+ 19.4
+64.5
+ 9.0
+ 53.7
+ 20.7
+ 29.0
+ 28.6
+ 17.1
+ 24.7
+ 13.2
+ 23.2
+ 27.1
+ 31.7
+ 16.4
+ 32.5
+ 33.2
+ 25.5
+ 17.8
+ 28.8
+ 28.9
+ 63.9
+ 11.6
+63.1
+425.4
+ 1 .1
+318.3
+217.1
+213.1
+40.1
IND.
FLOW
+55.3
+ 3.4
+ 19.8
+47.1
+4.3
+ 2.6
-9.6
+ 11.8
+0.0
+23.8
+ 17.4
+56.6
+ 7.8
+15.4
+ 10.7
+ 19.6
+ 7.2
+ 38.2
+154.5
+ 6.2
+62.8
+ 17.0
+ 10.5
+ 25.7
+42.3
+6.9
+40.6
+40.8
+961.5
+ 60.1
+164.6
+ 27.9
+ 25.5
+ 37.6
+ 56.8
+26.2
+110.2
-4.3
+ 18.1
+41.6
+ 76.9
+20.8
+41.1
+ 32.2
+ 41.3
+ 95.6
+ 31.2
+45.3
+119.0
+ 7.3
+2759.9
+ 0.0
+ 0.0
+ 0.0
+396.3
+0.0
+0.0
101,794 16,419 16.1 133,503 21.413 16.0
161,776 26.853 16.5
NOTES: 1. FLOWS IN CUBIC METERS X 1000
+25.4
SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS
23
-------
TABLE 8
PROJECTED INDUSTRIAL FLOW TO MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS
BY NUMBER, FLOW, AND PERCENT OF TOTAL FLOW
Table 8 summarizes the industrial flows expected at municipal plants in the
year 2000. A summary is provided for each State and U.S. Territory.
National totals are summarized at the bottom of the table. Table 8 is an
extension of the Projected Design portion of Table 7.
In the second column the total number of projected treatment plants in each
State is reported. Column three represents the total wastewater treatment
capacity of the plants in thousand cubic meters per day. The projected
design flow for each plant was used to calculate the total treatment
capacity value.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the plants that will be receiving
industrial flows into five flow ranges. The ranges specified in the column
headings are reported in thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses
under the headings, in million gallons per day.
Reported for each flow range are the number of plants in the range that will
be receiving industrial flows and the total amount of industrial flow
expected. Also reported is the percentage of the total State treatment
capacity that is accounted for by the industrial flow.
All flows in the columns are given in thousand cubic meters per day.
The data indicate that the largest percentage of industrial flows will be
treated by plants in the 1 to 50 mgd ranges.
24
-------
DECEMBER 31,
TABLE
1*82
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED INDUSTRIAL FLOW TO MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS BY NUHBER, FLON, AND PERCENT OF TOTAL FLOH
CUBIC METERS/DAY X 1000
(MILLION GALLONS PER DAY)
NUMBER AND
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIF.
COLORADO
CONN.
DELAWARE
HASH, D.C.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASS.
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISS.
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMP.
NEW JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEH YORK
N CAROLINA
N DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENN. 1
RHODE IS
S CAROLINA
S DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS 2
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
W VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMER SAMOA
GUAM
N MARIANAS
PUER. RICO
PAC TR TFR
VIRGIN IS
US TOTAL 21,
FLOW OF
TREATMENT
FACILITIES
342
124
170
484
2*1
103
22
1
31*
428
44
205
857
531
813
583
385
444
20(
281
148
48(
577
504
(32
181
4(5
71
142
154
1(0
8(4
(32
295
7*0
584
251
,241
25
285
277
285
.221
178
102
307
317
(21
112
1
3
31
21
5
027
1.07*
549
1,53*
1,215
11,412
2,038
2,0(4
588
l.K*
4,955
3.717
(7*
704
12.335
4.157
1.754
1.41*
1,974
2.471
(47
2,374
4,7**
7,494
2,4(1
1,3(4
3.450
455
1,058
805
802
5,351
497
14,072
3,3(5
214
8,2(0
1,524
1.914
8.212
824
1.779
317
3.401
10,072
1,322
271
3.1(0
2,8(1
1,04*
3.876
316
21
100
20
1,304
37
51
1(1,778
NUMBER
OF
PLANTS
44
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
15
28
0
0
8
18
7
1
57
1
4
1*
0
5
22
11
1!
0
3
0
1
0
0
13
45
1
1
1
48
0
33
20
2
22
2
14
1
44
31
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
574
0-.40
(0-.105) (
TOTAL
INDUS
FLOH
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
i
0
0
0
0
0
a
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
X OF
TOTAL
FLOH
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.10
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.08
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.04
0.0*
0.01
0.00
0.15
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
NUMBER
OF
PLANTS
72
0
0
18
17
*
8
5
0
74
84
1
B
(1
41
22
21
71
14
20
25
17
58
80
(4
(8
5
1*
0
U
12
3
125
118
2
It
14
5
17S
1
87
70
54
28
14
51
10
1(7
145
1
0
0
0
0
0
2,0(2
401-4.0
104-1.05)
TOTAL
INDUS
FLOH
12
0
0
11
17
1
3
0
11
22
0
1
18
10
7
4
11
1
11
4
12
21
32
11
10
0
0
2
0
31
35
0
11
12
1
2*
0
25
17
17
4
4
13
5
22
51
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
581
X OF
TOTAL
FLOU
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.95
0.13
0.1*
0.17
1.03
0.00
0.15
o!o(
0.44
0.14
0.25
0.42
0.11
0.54
0.14
2.03
0.18
0.25
0.28
1.32
0.*5
0.8*
0.0*
0.57
0.00
0.83
0.05
0.10
0.22
1.05
0.12
0.14
0.80
0.08
0.34
0.04
1.42
0.42
0.50
0.17
0.10
1.72
0.42
0.20
2.0*
1.12
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.35
4.001-40
(1.04-10.5)
NUMBER TOTAL
OF INDUS
PLANTS FLOH
4*
4
5
11
*0
17
44
1
0
20
(0
1
B
*5
54
27
25
40
11
22
14
50
40
15
10
44
7
17
2
21
57
7
*!
B*
B
88
18
18
11*
*
'I
(1
85
5
12
28
24
20
(2
4
1
0
0
14
1
0
1,770
181
1
11
122
111
44
145
0
0
5*
220
5
1*
241
188
110
54
7*
15
71
47
1*8
102
»7
88
125
8
57
1
73
155
13
284
487
18
2*1
40
41
2*0
40
ill
11
23
(4
80
27
181
2
10
0
0
32
0
o
5,402
X OF
TOTAL
FLOH
5.94
0.45
0.85
10. 0(
2.47
2.18
(.*5
0.0(
0.00
0.85
5.92
0.85
2.82
1.95
4.54
(.11
3.85
4.03
0.61
11.11
1.)*
4.13
l.K
3.*5
(.45
l!*5
5.1*
0.24
f.21
2.8*
1.90
2.02
14.47
8.84
1.52
2. (4
2.17
1.53
4.84
14.34
4.1*
3.73
1.42
0.84
8.58
2.04
2.7*
2. (4
4. (7
0.43
44.77
0.00
0.00
2.4*
0.1*
0.00
1.33
40.001-1*0 1*0+
(10.57-50.2) (50.2+)
NUMBER TOTAL
OF INDUS
PLANTS FLOH
10
1
2
15
4
11
1
0
11
18
0
25
1*
B
1
7
5
4
7
11
2
f
2
3
0
1
17
0
23
1*
0
24
3
4
11
4
2(
S
0
18
4
14
1
0
0
0
7
c
o
440
11*
17
51
3*
507
20
215
0
455
0
54
550
405
208
105
(4
(1
35
172
380
414
157
15
1*1
4
113
0
54
26B
0
422
504
0
500
3*
171
1*5
102
'H
in
(8
0
42*
74
71
3(2
1*
8,(0(
X OF NUMBER TOTAL
TOTAL OF INDUS
FLOH PLANTS FLOH
3.8*
4.71
3.14
3 .'78
1.00
10.4*
1.54
8.00
2.24
12.24
0.00
7.73
4.44
ll!«7
7.45
2.47
5.45
7.27
7.92
5.7*
(.38
1.12
S.S*
1.07
10.74
0.00
(.77
5.01
0.00
3.00 1
15.05
0.00
(.05
2.5*
8.95
2.37
12.3*
».S7
Ml
2.48
5.15
0.00
13.57
2.45
(.81
9.33
2.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.57
0.00
0 . 00
54
0
0
o
1,434
170
37
145
8
170
24
47
0
1,384
27(
0
4(
105
4S
0
121
(10
1,080
3(3
14
427
0
71
18
44
85*
17
813
0
0
951
38
75
545
111
8
(47
410
0
(4
21*
0
480
0
0
0
0
17
o
fl
5.31 IK 12,238
X OF
TOTAL
FLOH
1.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.70
B.1S
1.81
24.74
8.00
2.44
0.45
4.95
0.00
11.24
(.(4
0.00
1.10
15.4*
1.83
8.00
5.12
12.72
14.40
14.74
1.22
12.1*
0.00
(.7*
2.34
5.75
14.05
2.44
5.77
«. 00
0.00
11.27
2.53
5.95
(.(3
13.77
7.2(
0.00
2.01
7.44
0.00
12.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.32
0.00
0 00
25
-------
TABLE 9
PERCENT OF FLOW AT ALL TREATMENT LEVELS
(EXISTING AND PLANNED)
NATIONAL SUMMARY
Table 9 summarizes the degree of treatment received by all wastewater
collected in the U.S. at present (1982) and the degree of treatment
projected to be received in 2000.
Explanations of the categories and definitions of terms follow:
Existing Facilities: Pertains to treatment plants that were operational in
1982. New treatment plants under construction in 1982 and plants planned to
be constructed by 2000 are not included in this category.
Actual 1982 Flow: Compiled from the actual average daily flow received at a
treatment plant during the most recent 12 month period for which information
was available.
Present Design: Refers to the average daily flow that a treatment plant is
currently (1982) designed to accommodate.
Projected Design; Refers to the average daily flow that a treatment plant
will be designed to accommodate in the year 2000.
Planned Facilities: Treatment plants that were not operational in 1982 but
are expected to be operational by the year 2000. Included are new treatment
plants that were under construction in 1982.
All Facilities (2000): Includes all treatment plants that will be
operational in 2000.This includes facilities presently on line that will
remain operational through 2000, new facilities under construction in 1982,
and new facilities planned to be built by 2000. Excluded are facilities
that are presently on line but are to be taken out of service by 2000.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
Definitions of the levels of treatment (no discharge, primary, secondary,
etc.) are given in subsequent tables that summarize information for each
level of treatment.
Communities that discharge untreated or raw sewage are not included in this
summary.
26
-------
DECEMBER SI, If82
TABLE 9
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PERCENT OF FLOW AT ALL TREATMENT LEVELS
(EXISTING AND PLANNED)
NATIONAL SUMMARY
«MitiiiiM««ii««ii««itiiitii»ii«it«iiiiiiitiiiiiiititit«itiMiit«it«it EXISTING FACILITIES ««iiitiiii»i.)<««»««««in<««««««ii«««««»«»ii«««M«««««i.i.i1
FACILITIESl COUNT
X OF TOTAL
ACTUAL 1982 FLOUl CUBIC METERS/1000
MED
X OF TOTAL
PRESENT DESIGN! CUBIC METERS/1000
MGD
X OF TOTAL
PROJECTED DESIGN: CUBIC METERS/1000
MGD
X OF TOTAL
iiii««iiiiii«ii«««««ifii«««««if«ii«««««iiiiii«ii»»»«»i>*«»»»»it« ALL FACILITIES (2000) ««»»)ni«««««»««i(««»«»«««»«««)(«««»)i«««««»i(«)(»ii«»
NO ADVANCED ADVANCED ANT
DISCHARGE PRIMARY PRIMARY SECONDARY SECONDARY TERTIARY TOTAL
FACILITIES! COUNT 2.734 3 » 11,748 5,845 470 21,011
X OF TOTAL 13.0 0.0 0.0 55.9 27.8 3.1
PROJECTED DESIGN! CUBIC METERS/1000 5,832 834 4,709 66,1*8 73,015 11,0(3 HI.60S
MGD 1,540 220 1,244 17,474 19,288 2,922 42,491
X OF TOTAL 3.4 0.5 2.9 40.9 45.1 4.8
NO
DISCHARGE
1,400
10.1
1,858
491
1.8
2,873
759
2.1
4,972
1,313
3.3
PRIMARY
1,034
4.7
9,344
2,474
9.2
11,537
3,047
8.4
1,042
275
0.4
ADVANCED
PRIMARY
2,083
13.5
10,494
2,825
10.5
12,839
3,391
9.4
4,709
1,244
3.1
SECONDARY
7,944
51.5
41,471
11,008
40.9
54,100
14,291
40.5
58,555
15,448
39.2
ADVANCED
SECONDARY
2,529
14.3
35,494
9,374
34.8
47,544
12,559
35.4
49,453
18.347
44.5
AHT
TERTIARY
231
1.4
2,705
714
2.4
4,599
1,215
3.4
10,528
2,781
7.0
TOTAL
15,425
101,794
24,891
133,495
35,245
149,240
39,430
NO
DISCHARGE
670
12.2
840
227
4.8
PRIMARY
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
ADVANCED
PRIMARY
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
SECONDARY
4,240
59.9
7,428
2,015
40.4
ADVANCED
SECONDARY
1,808
25.5
3,542
941
28.3
AHT
TERTIARY
157
2.2
530
140
4.2
TOTAL
7,075
12,581
3,323
27
-------
TABLE 10
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1982
Table 10 is the first of a number of related tables concerning plant
loadings, removal efficiencies, and discharge rates for facilities with
various levels of treatment. Table 10 gives an estimate of the overall
average daily pollutant load received by all treatment plants and provides
an estimate of the amount of pollutants in the effluent. A total is shown
for each State and U.S. Territory. A national total is provided at the
bottom of the table.
Quantities of pollutant in the influent and effluent are estimated for BODc
and Solids. Quantities are given in metric tons per day. The quantities
are calculated using the average daily flow and the average daily BOD,- and
Solids influent and effluent concentrations, along with appropriate
conversion factors. The average values were compiled from the most recent
12 month period for which information was available. Average Statewide
removal efficiencies for BOD5 and Solids are also shown. The major source
of flow and concentration information for this series of tables was the
self-monitoring reports that are submitted by every facility with an NPDES
permit.
Plants With Removal Capability are facilities with a specific requirement to
remove the nutrient listed. For example, some phosphorus is removed in all
treatment plants. However, only plants specifically designed to remove
phosphorus are reported in this category. Reported for each nutrient are
the total number of plants with this removal capability and the total
average daily flow received by these plants. Also given is the percentage
of the total State flow these plants represent. All flows are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day.
Total Flow is the sum of the actual average daily flow treated by all
facilities within the State regardless of the degree of treatment.
Excluded from this summary are facilities with no discharge to surface
waters and communities discharging raw sewage. For this reason, the total
flow listed on this table does not match the total actual average daily
flows listed on Tables 6 and 7.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD,- or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
28
-------
DECEMBER 31.
TABU 10
1982
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADINGS. REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1982
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
«« REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES
STATS
*;*!*"*
*
».
ARKANSAS
COLORADO
"NNECTICUT
DELAHARE
""' COIUH'
*
ND ANA
i-2 *
""*
**«*=
««
LOUISIANA
SJJwiu.
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
»M«A
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MONTANA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
RHODE
T|NN|SSEE
WEST VIRGINIA
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
NOTES)
ACTUAL
FLON
1.334
159
t71
8,204
1,240
1,514
322
'»»*
*»*
"*
l'»»
»21
"e
1.237
"*
1,401
3.253
752
2'"7
248
"*
*8t
303
*>z«
297
9.122
1.718
139
1,177
§i!M
484
-
388
1
33
517
1
24
""*"" BOM "
INF. EFF. REH.
215
2*
ISO
U5
*'"Z
283
208
57
»*
W
>»*
«2
8S
1>U1
"7
*°2
198
"»
244
"
279
530
ltl?f
411
147
Ǥ1
44
17*
77
tt
»"
tO
1.244
379
32
224
"°
72
"
27
1»
87.4
««*
Bt.t
22
*"
2t 90.5
37 81.8
S 84.4
2 98.t
** »!!
" "-I
" «*.5
7 »0-»
S*
t7
50
**
41
»«
71
2t«
»°'8
83.1
74.5
"-7
82.9
!
74.5
49.2
47 88.5
19 86.5
18S "-s
8 81.7
7
21
»»
10
311
3t
2
"S
'*
21
90.8
t7 7
»»»
82.1
74.9
90.3
91.8
90.4
79-8
73.4
«
24 72 8
3.1
4.3
INF.
220
1S8
Z'"l
290
III
t2
188
"*
"0
to
83
St7
187
»
255
»»
295
585
'"8
4t4
Itl
S88
37
18Z
83
t3
>»*
t4
.257
3tl
30
242
"»
72
B
8t
DS «« PHOSPHORUS »»
X « X TOT.
F. REN. PLANTS FLOW FLON
39
12
20
44
526
26
51
17
10
87
87
20
8
101
48
65
35
40
52
22
54
221
156
48
31
153
7
51
t
14
447
10
305
48
4
220
23
27
248
25
39
t
105
192
37
as
17
41
82
to
87
71
80
90
76
71
94
88
76
tt
89
93
90
82
81
79
79
77
81
.2
.9
.7
.9
.2
.8
.4
.9
.4
.t
.4
.3
.7
. 1
.8
.0
.3
«4
.t
.t
.4
42.2
94
89. t
0
0
0 0.
O 0.
NH3
t
PLANTS
0 15
0 0
0 0.0 0
1
19
10
0
0
30
55
0
0
0
0
1
8
7
122
21
80.4 1
73
79
71
.B
.1
. 7
92.5
77.3
t2
84.5
75. t
86.5
86.1
84
84
88
78
0
7
5
44.8
0
0
0
2
1
5
1
29
2
0
58
4
2
87
1
0 0.
491 5.
B 0.
30 2.
1 0.
1,169 100.
424 10.
tO 3.
0 0.
0 0
12
7
1
1
1
12
22
0
0 0.0 1
252 3.
1,123 31.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
744 54 .
65 2.
4,t07 89.
192 11.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
242 42.
0 0.
43 1 .
42
15
15
0
43
1
0
5
7
18
3
9
1
0
0
I
I
S
2 0.9 0
745 8.3 21
5 0.3 42
0 0.0 0
1,097 19. i
tt 9.J
90
5
104 B.B 1
t27 11 . 1
127
3 O.t 0
77.8 I 4 0.5 15
82 .*2
S6.0
7t
88
74
SO
92
o
1
5
0
4
i
t
11
i
2
tl
9 73.0 0
0
7
0
*2
0
2
4.7
4
41 .
72 .
BO .
54.
3
t
o
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0.0 2
0 0.0 3t
7J i-S 5*
0 0.0 0
4 2.4
342 20.1
122 7. a
7 l.B
1.558 t7.9
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0. C
0 0 . C
0 0.0
0 0.0
0
{
Z
5
42
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NITROGEN TOTAL N «««
X TOT. t X TOT.
FLOH FLOW PLANTS FLOH FLOW
326
0
0
0
786
31
0
3
1,149
158
IBl
0
4
4.902
1,057
to
0
183
S
0
68
111
560
27
25
9t
0
0
90
0
73
0
124
389
0
453
70
30
541
0
144
10
545
213
0
0
232
1
135
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.5
2.5
0.0
1.1
100.0
3.7
9.0
0.0
1.1
tl.O
29.2
5.2
0.0
18.3
0.4
0.0
4.8
3.4
10.8
l.t
3.3
4.2
0.0
0.0
23.5
0.1
1.7
0.0
1.3
22. t
0.0
11. t
9.7
2.6
9.7
0.0
It.B
5.1
"»:l
0.0
0.0
13. t
0.1
5.0
5.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
7
1
0
o
0
7
o
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
B
1
0
0
0
0
s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
255
2
0
o
0
233
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
5
o
123
24
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
0
111
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
28
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.8
0.1
0.0
0*0
0.0
5.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
8.7
0.7
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.t
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0*0
o'o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.935 20.521 4.129 79.8 23,247 4,027 82.t 584 14,242 14.2
1. FLONS IN CUBIC METERS X 1000 2. METRIC TONS X .9072 « SHORT TONS
3. SUN OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS
4. FACILITIES KITH ZERO DISCHARGE OR RAN DISCHARGE ARE NOT INCLUDED
686 13,038 13.0
892 0.8
29
-------
TABLE 11
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES PROJECTED FOR 2000
Table 11 is a companion table to the summary provided on Table 10. This
table summarizes the year 2000 situation with regard to flows, pollutant
loadings, and removal efficiencies. All flows and quantities are estimated
using the projected design flow and the projected level of treatment for
treatment plants expected to be operational in the year 2000.
Quantities of pollutant in the influent and effluent are estimated for BOD,-
and Solids. Quantities are given in metric tons per day. The quantities
were calculated using the average daily flow and the average daily influent
and effluent BOD,- and Solids concentrations, along with appropriate
conversion factors? The average values used for this summary represent the
projected year 2000 situation. Average Statewide removal efficiencies for
BOD5 and Solids projected for the year 2000 are also shown.
Plants with Removal Capability are facilities with a specific requirement to
remove the nutrient listed. For example, some phosphorus is removed in all
treatment plants. However, only plants specifically designed to remove
phosphorus are reported in this category. Reported for each nutrient are
the total number of plants with this removal capability and the total
average daily flow to be received by these plants in the year 2000. Also
given is the percentage of the total State flow these plants will represent.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
Total Flow is the sum of the actual average daily flow treated by all
facilities within the State regardless of the level of treatment.
Excluded from this summary are facilities with no discharge to surface
waters and communities discharging raw sewage. For this reason, the total
flow listed on this table does not match the total projected design flows
listed on Tables 6 and 7.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD,- or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
30
-------
DECEMBER Jl, 1*82
TABLE 11
1*82 HEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES PROJECTED FOR 2000
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
MAUAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOJTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
KVOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
NOTESt
PROJECTED X X t
FLOW INF. EFF. REN. INF. EFF. REN. PLANTS
3.079 (41 75 88.2 (51 92 85.8 0
569 (1 25 (0.8 71 22 (9.7 0
1,282 291 18 86.9 284 19 84.0 2
1.208
11. (78
1.952
2.054
584
. 1.1(9
5.194
1.471
(41
(12
12.129
4.155
1.747
1.141
1.971
2.456
(35
2.375
4,782
7,409
2,435
1,311
1,445
439
99(
716
774
5.317
592
14,051
3.350
198
8,245
1,420
1,851
8,206
824
1,7(7
303
3,377
9, (36
1,242
2(9
3.152
2,814
1.047
3,791
107
23
94
20
1.306
36
51
155,915
1. FLOWS
3. SUM OF
288
1,405
4(2
400
280
1.089
71!
171
159
1,981
814
565
110
416
549
155
527
971
1,420
((8
271
797
80
155
111
231
1,558
125
2, (17
872
51
1,759
12!
4(1
1,721
209
475
8(
1,027
2,282
720
(45
214
895
((
7
19
2
3(1
7
12
35,2(7 3,
IN CUBIC
ENTRIES
4. FACILITIES WITH
24 91. ( 276
(57 80. ( 1,545
49 89.1 4(8
54 86.4 407
9 91.3 114
5 97.9 280
117 89.2 1.151
(8 90. ( 702
(2 65.5 135
15 90.2 1(4
142 92.7 2.815
(3 92.3 940
42 92.4 481
18 88.1 556
4( 88.9 454
(7 87.7 557
19 87. ( 174
55 89.4 485
124 84. 9 1,080
1(8 88.1 1,9(1
19 94.0 7C9
24 90.1 2(7
99 87.5 811
11 83.7 84
29 91.5 353
11 89.7 109
21 90.5 204
13! 91.4 1,59!
17 84.2 127
174 85.7 2,851
57 93.4 759
4 90.2 $0
125 92.8 1,9(2
27 91.1 142
11 91.1 449
181 89.4 1,921
21 89.5 187
45 90.4 184
6 92.0 8!
71 92.8 880
142 91.7 2.279
14 93.8 278
(1 91.5 714
157 75. ( (71
24 88.7 21!
102 88.5 954
9 S4.0 (9
0 90.9 3
2 85.0 21
0 85.2 2
38 89.2 325
1 87.1 7
1 87.7 13
884 88.9 37,357
METERS X 1000 2.
28
547
49
52
11
8
121
97
52
17
198
(4
54
42
54
74
21
55
1(1
182
(8
39
104
14
11
8
21
114
17
182
97
5
140
41
55
212
22
51
7
64
(0
114
24
100
11
0
2
P
38
1
1
4,171
METRIC
MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE
ZERO DISCHARGE OR
89. (
84.5
89.1
87.1
91.2
97.0
89.4
84.1
(1.5
89. (
92.9
91.1
88. (
88.1
87.9
84.5
87.8
88.5
85.0
90.7
90.1
85. (i
84.'.
79.9
90.9
91.9
89.3
91.5
85.9
84.5
87.2
88.1
92.8
87.9
92.0
88.9
87.9
86.7
91.0
90.1
91.4
95.5
88.1
91.5
80.0
88.5
89.4
81.5
80.0
84.7
85.2
88.0
87.1
88.8
88.8
TONS X
0
9
15
1
1
24
21
0
48
85
0
0
1
0
12
22
28
189
57
2
0
0
0
2
18
1
74
10
0
185
4
2
220
2
16
0
U
0
24
20
2
1
75
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1,21!
.9072
PLANTS
X TOT.
FLOW FLOW
0 0.0
0 0.0
9 0.7
0
1.0(2
41
114
(0
1.1(9
1.081
402
0
45
604
1.901
0
0
0
0
27
1.795
710
7,174
1(1
1
0
0
0
492
59
217
11
2,9(9
47
0
5,502
114
112
1,4(7
152
0
2
124
0
97
798
254
13
2. (47
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
31.919
SHORT
0.0
9.0
2.1
14.2
10.4
100.0
20.8
11.5
0.0
7.1
4.9
45.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.2
75. (
14.8
96.8
14.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
68.6
7.6
4.0
1.9
21.1
1.4
0.0
((.7
9.4
7.1
17.8
0.7
8.6
0.0
0.0
»:§
56. 4
25.1
8.1
1.2
(9.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
20.4
TONS
«« NH1
t
PLANTS
104
0
0
0
14
15
11
z
1
104
111
0
7
107
(0
97
0
232
1
0
14
21
43
24
202
44
1
121
2(4
0
3(8
15
1
3(7
3
72
12
177
(5
2
14
9
5
25
102
4
0
g
0
3
g
0
2,880
NITROGEN » »««« TOTAL N «»«
X TOT. t X TOT.
FLOW FLOW PLANTS FLOW FLOW
991 12.1 0 0 0.0
0 0.0 00 0.0
0 A. A n A n
1,74}
33(
255
15
1.1(9
790
2.04)
g
104
9, (75
2.309
(28
g
728
7
0
331
480
1.257
1.412
589
11!
10
g
151
73
1.034
g
887
1,971
g
4,545
3(1
54
1,880
1(4
471
1(7
2,191
1.15;
477
254
140
(27
96
0
Q
Q
18
g
0
41,800
o.o
14.9
17.2
12.4
2.5
100.0
15.2
58.8
0.0
17.3
78.4
55.5
35.9
0.0
14.8
0.3
0.0
11.9
10.0
14.9
57.9
44.9
1.2
2. 1
0.0
21 . 1
9.4
19.4
0.0
(.1
58.8
D.O
55.1
25.4
1.9
22.9
19.9
24.4
54.9
I'.i
28.5
15.1
9.0
11.1
14.5
11.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
24.8
g
1
1
g
g
9
1
g
2
1
g
g
g
1
1
g
5
2
2
1
g
g
g
g
1
g
s
g
25
1
g
2
0
0
17
0
0
I
o
8
1
7
0
g
g
g
g
0
0
104
g
882
5
22
g
g
201
7
g
11
g
g
g
1
7
g
157
38
22
2
g
g
g
g
g
139
g
100
0
g
1
0
0
1(4
0
0
0
22
0
g
259
217
41
0
g
g
g
g
g
0
2.714
g
'.S
* 2
.1
.0
.0
.8
.2
« 0
.8
.0
.0
0.0
0*0
0.0
0*3
0.0
15.0
0.8
0.3
O.D
0.0
0.0
0.0
0*0
0*0
0*0
2.4
0.0
2.1
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0*0
8.2
8.4
3.9
0.0
0.0
0 .0
g t g
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
TO ROUND-OFFS
RAH DISCHARGE
ARE NOT INCLUDED
31
-------
TABLE 12
TREATMENT POPULATIONS
PRESENT, PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 12 summarizes the populations by State for 1980 and 2000 which are now
or will be receiving treatment of their wastewaters.
The values listed for the 2000 State ceiling populations were obtained from
data provided by the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA). The population totals listed under the 1980 column for each State
and the nation are based on the 1980 population as reported in the April
1981 Report of the Bureau of Census. The year 2000 total is the population
expected to be resident in each State as predicted by BEA. The projections
were produced by BEA after extensive analysis which included review and
comment by State agencies responsible for population projections.
Resident populations (RES) are permanent residents within the service area
of the established sewerage authority. Nonresident populations (NONRES)
include transients, seasonal workers, commuters, tourists, and other persons
who must be served by local systems but do not maintain a permanent
residence within the service area.
Persons are included in the Receiving Treatment category if the wastewater
they generate is treated at a facility operated by an established sewerage
authority. Persons are included in the Not Receiving Treatment category if
they reside in the service area of an established sewerage authority but
their residence is not connected to a central collection system.
The sum of the populations receiving treatment and not receiving treatment
does not equal the State's total populatio'n. This is because many rural
residents who are counted as a part of the State's total population do not
reside in the service area of any established sewerage authority and,
therefore, are not included in any Receiving Treatment or Not Receiving
Treatment categories.
All levels of treatment are included under Receiving Treatment. Similar
summaries are presented on subsequent tables for each specific level of
treatment.
The Percent Served values are based upon a comparison between the resident
population receiving treatment and the total State population figures
provided by BEA.
A similar summary dealing with collection populations is presented on Table
49.
32
-------
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
T!
PRESENT
«»«« POPULATION »» »« RECEIVING TREATMENT »»»«»«
TREATMENT POPULATIONS
PROJECTED, RESIDENT I NONRESIDENT
( IN THOUSANDS )
DECEMBER St.
TABLE 12
«» NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT null
PERCENT SERVED
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEH VORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
HEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1980
TOTAL
3,890
400
2,718
2,286
23.669
2,889
3,108
595
638
9,740
5,464
965
944
11,418
5,490
2,913
2,363
3,661
4,204
1,125
4,216
5,737
9.258
4,077
2,521
4,917
787
1,570
799
921
7,364
1,300
17,577
5,874
653
10,797
3,025
2,633
11.867
947
3,119
690
4.591
14,228
1,4(1
511
5,346
4,130
1,950
4.705
450
33
110
17
3.197
118
99
2000
TOTAL
4.140
694
4.357
2,970
26,786
4,371
3,902
841
694
15,049
7,053
1,366
1,183
12,358
6,059
3,101
2,642
4,224
4,880
1,222
5,583
6,736
10,314
4,505
2.740
5.379
938
1,734
1,408
1,306
9,022
1,781
19,683
7,419
690
12,237
3,702
3,209
12,854
1,084
3,700
730
5,573
21,000
1,963
607
6,755
4,859
2,101
5,553
484
40
275
33
4,700
183.
116
1980
RES.
2,121
202
2.209
1,275
19,457
2.735
1.913
490
744
5.732
3,291
597
503
9,866
3,560
2,099
1,833
1.748
2.829
562
2.361
3,871
6,986
3.002
1,465
3.622
474
1,247
730
393
6,084
904
12.514
2,545
441
8,482
1,858
1,458
9,148
628
1.327
459
2,172
12,161
1,223
233
3.377
2.334
826
3.324
333
1
71
1
1.757
11
79
2000
RES.
3,511
666
4,120
2,468
26.930
4.230
3.028
817
913
13.098
5.892
1,240
1,066
12,098
4,964
2,827
2,526
3,186
4,841
922
4,002
5,780
8.900
3.802
2,335
5,307
709
1,708
1.374
894
8,281
1,522
17,671
4,576
578
12,091
3.309
3,055
12,221
922
2.915
668
4,286
20,267
1,957
375
5,767
4,354
2,072
4,812
617
32
209
31
3.242
103
128
1980
NONRES.
101
3
69
33
1.079
189
31
91
1.898
801
135
87
13
35
246
77
16
60
95
83
144
52
128
25
11
886
33
17
92
51
1.025
23
2.385
185
0
57
2
42
535
48
280
14
68
236
192
45
305
439
16
105
IB
0
9
0
0
0
3
2000
NONRES.
233
19
181
46
1.503
570
44
415
2.223
1.695
221
240
81
47
485
129
21
97
107
128
460
201
237
36
27
1,209
38
26
193
190
1.507
36
4,039
444
1
104
12
81
1.211
71
519
11
145
530
327
74
460
746
24
195
28
1
3
2
0
4
3
1980
RES.
536
122
306
195
1.474
31
1,226
64
0
1,997
762
205
121
291
353
166,
174
720
688
417
537
1,955
1,387
224
383
313
33
46
44
384
1,267
132
5,356
1,488
7
989
188
344
2,318
304
673
17
940
1,091
79
119
1,122
639
952
411
3
27
26
17
1,184
100
30
2000
RES.
88
27
93
33
261
2
889
23
0
566
318
0
20
101
40
24
6
257
4
226
128
957
876
129
129
22
1
7
4
259
699
47
2.260
909
3
119
37
11
555
163
108
6
284
12
3
86
547
138
29
192
0
2
15
1
771
79
7
1980
NONRES.
13
3
11
0
43
0
y
35
0
36
4
11
24
0
65
20
0
0
9
9
136
94
41
7
2
9
0
0
0
65
367
6
404
103
0
13
7
2
241
0
55
0
1
1
1
16
2
28
2
20
0
0
200J
NONRES.
0
0
4
0
10
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
118
56
45
6
0
0
0
0
0
37
55
2
26
27
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
4
0
8
0
21
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1980
54.5
50.6
81.3
55.8
82.2
94.7
61.6
62.4
116.6
58.9
60.2
61.9
53.3
86.4
64.9
72.1
77.6
47.8
67.3
50.0
56.0
67.5
75.5
73.7
58.1
73.7
60.3
79.5
91.4
42.8
82.6
69.5
71.2
43.3
67.5
78.6
61.5
55.4
77.1
66.3
42.6
66.6
47.3
85.5
83.7
45.8
63.2
56.5
42.4
70.7
74.0
4.2
64.8
6.1
55.0
9.5
60.0
2000
84.
96.
94.
83.
100.
96.
77.
97.
131.
67.
83.
90.
90.
97.
61.
91.
95.
75.
99.
75.
71.
65.
86.
84.
65.
96.
75.
98.
97.
68.
91.
85.
89.
61.
83.
98.
69.
95.
95.
85.
78.
91.
76.
96.
99.
61.
85.
89.
98.
86.
127.
80.
76.
94.
69.
56.
110.
U.S. TOTALS
230,075
278.886 161.692 250.245 12.638 21,707
35,024 12,598
1.981
475
89.7
33
-------
TABLE 13
SEPTIC TANK POPULATION
PRESENT, PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 13 summarizes the populations by State for 1980 and 2000 which are
now, or for the year 2000, will continue to be disposing of their
wastewaters by means of individual onsite systems, the majority being septic
tanks or leach fields. The values listed for the 1980 and 2000 State
ceiling populations were obtained from data provided by BEA.
All the populations are listed under the Not Receiving Treatment category
only because they are not being served by centralized collection and
treatment facilities. None of the populations listed on this table live
within the service district of a sewage authority with a central collection
and treatment system. Most of the populations are in small communities and
do not include the strictly rural populations within the State.
Resident populations (RES) are permanent residents within the boundaries of
an incorporated area. Nonresident populations (NONRES) include transients,
seasonal workers, commuters, tourists, and other persons who must be served
by local systems but do not maintain a permanent residence within the
service area.
The Percent Served values are based upon a comparison between the resident
population not receiving treatment and the total State population figures
provided by BEA.
34
-------
**« POPULATION ««
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
SEPTIC TANK POPULATION
PRESENT, PROJECTED. RESIDENT I NONRESIDENT
( IN THOUSANDS >
«»«« RECEIVING TRfATMENT ««
DECENBER 31,
TABLE 11
««» NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT null
PERCENT SERVED
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
BIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I OH A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
NYOMIN6
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1*80
TOTAL
3,8*0
400
2.718
2,286
23,66*
2.88*
3.108
5*5
638
*.740
5.464
965
944
11.418
5.4*0
2,913
2,363
3,661
4. 20*
1,125
4,214
5,737
9,258
4,077
2,521
4,917
787
1,570
7*>
921
7,364
1,300
17,577
5,874
653
10,7*7
3.025
2,633
11,867
»47
3,11*
6*0
4,5*1
14,228
1,461
5.144
4.130
1,950
4,705
450
33
110
17
3,1*7
118
*)
2000 1*80 2000 1*80 2000
TOTAL RES. RES. NQNRES. NONRES.
4,140
6*4
4,357
2,*70
26,786
4,371
3,902
8*1
6**
15.0**
7.053
1,366
1,183
12,358
6,05*
3.101
2,6*2
4,224
4,880
1,222
5,583
4,736
10,31*
4,505
2,740
5,37*
938
1,73*
1,408
1,306
0 0
0 0
0
0
9,022 0 0
1,781 0 0
19,683 0 0
7,41* 0 0
6*0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,237 0000
3,702 0000
3,20* 0000
12,854 0 f 0 0
1,084 0000
3.700 0000
730 0000
5,573 0000
21,000 0000
1.963 0000
607 0000
6,755 0000
4.85* 0000
2.101 0000
5,553 0000
484 0 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 0
275 0000
33 0 0 0 0
4,700 0000
183 0000
116 0000
1*80
RES.
203
36
144
122
423
15
187
8
0
54*
161
56
47
174
138
74
52
232
436
104
13*
456
583
98
135
105
If
*
31
123
S77
46
2.258
31*
6
272
68
26
1,102
37
1*6
14
112
508
61
41
762
1*7
683
1*2
2
0
0
g
5
56
0
2000
RES.
28
12
45
27
11*
1
314
1
0
IS
70
0
3
87
16
22
6
2
4
12
S3
54
536
5*
6
21
1
7
1
13
457
10
1.413
1*
3
79
18
11
2*0
0
3
6
4
J
488
14
7
155
0
0
0
1
0
3*
0
1*80
NONRES.
2
5
7
0
36
0
0
SI
0
11
2
11
1*
0
It
20
0
0
6
4
135
30
36
6
0
8
0
0
0
47
322
6
14
»7
0
2
7
1
235
0
51
0
0
41
1
7
12
2
16
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
NONRES.
0
0
4
0
10
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
118
0
30
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
48
2
21
13
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
21
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1*80 2000
5.2 .7
g.
5.
5.
1.
0.
12.
1.
0.
f.
3.
5.
5.
1 .
2 .
2 .
2.
f ,
10.
g
3 f
8.
t .
2 .
5.
2.
2.
0.
4.
13.
7.
3.
12.
5,
1.
2 1
2 .
1.
g .
4.
6.
2.
2 f
3.
J:
4.
35.
4.
.8
.0
.*
.4
.0
.1
.2
.0
.1
.0
.0
.3
.7
.3
.7
.3
.1
.1
.0
.0
.8
.2
.3
.2
.4
.2
.4
.1
.1
.1
.6
.2
.2
.4
.7
.5
.4
.3
.0
.1
.8
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.3
2.8
0.5 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
56.* 4.5
0.2 0.0
48.2 21.8
0.0 0.0
U.S. TOTALS
230,075
278,888
12.638
4.58*
1.271
3ia
5.5
35
-------
TABLE 14
POPULATIONS SERVED BY TREATMENT WITH NO DISCHARGE
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 14 summarizes the populations by State for 1980 and 2000 which are now
or will be receiving treatment of their wastewaters at facilities that do
not discharge to surface waters. The majority of the facilities are lagoon
systems designed for evaporation and/or infiltration of the total flow.
Also included are facilities that dispose of their effluent by recycling,
reuse, spray irrigation or other land disposal, or groundwater recharge.
Also summarized for each State and the nation as a whole is the number of no
discharge facilities in operation in 1980 and the number expected to be
operational in 2000.
The terms total population, resident, nonresident, receiving treatment, not
receiving treatment, and percent served are defined in the description
accompanying Table 12.
36
-------
DECEMBER Jl.
TABLE 14
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY TREATNENT NITH NO DISCHARGE
PRESENT AND PROJECTED. RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
(POPULATION IN THOUSANDS)
POPULATION ««« ««« RECEIVING TREATMENT «" »«« NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT «
PERCENT » "« TREATMENT "
SERVED PLANTS
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEN YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTAL
1980
TOTAL
3.890
400
2,718
2,286
23,669
2,889
3,108
595
638
9,740
5,464
965
944
11.418
5.490
2.913
2.363
3,661
4,204
1.125
4,216
5,737
9,258
4,077
2,521
4,917
787
1.570
799
921
7,364
1,300
17,577
5,874
653
10,797
3,025
2,63)
11.867
947
3,119
690
4,591
14,228
1,461
511
5,346
4,130
1,950
4,705
450
JJ
110
17
3,197
118
99
230,075
2000
TOTAL
4,140
694
4,357
2,970
26.786
4,371
3,902
841
694
15,049
7,053
1,366
1,18)
12.358
6.059
3.101
2,642
4.224
4.880
1.222
5.58)
6.7)6
10.314
4.505
2,740
5,379
9)8
1,7)4
1,408
1.306
9.022
1,781
19,68)
7.419
690
12,2)7
3,702
3.209
12.854
1,084
3,700
730
5,573
21,000
1.963
607
6.755
4,859
2,101
5,55)
484
40
275
33
4.700
18)
116
278.888
1980
RES.
0
0
191
3
1,621
45
1
0
0
48)
90
0
2)
0
0
2
82
0
5
2
0
0
95
4
0
3
16
67
49
2
24
161
4
1
8
3
87
35
1
0
6
13
0
864
70
0
0
25
0
54
6
0
5
0
0
0
0
4,172
2300
RES.
1
0
630
13
3.265
184
17
4
0
J.601
255
76
196
14
2
11
160
0
78
27
2
37
217
54
69
13
26
142
206
47
62
252
56
29
41
28
275
128
1)
0
IS
22
26
20
52
2
156
17
0
12
0
0
4
0
11,809
1980
NONRES
0
0
17
0
157
1
0
0
0
39
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
6)
3
0
0
0
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
NONRES
0
0
148
0
422
4
0
7
0
482
0
13
31
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
25
)2
3
0
1
2
5
76
28
0
0
1
10
0
1
2
5
0
0
I
5
0
'if
i
3
0
28
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,489
1980
RES.
0
0
38
0
260
0
7
0
0
52
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
15
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
31
9
5
1
0
0
7
IS
4
0
0
0
0
26
1
0
o
0
2
Q
0
2
0
0
0
0
522
2000
RES.
0
0
8
0
35
0
62
0
0
196
7
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
62
31
14
2
0
0
0
3
32
31
0
20
10
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
o
0
1
Q
0
3
0
0
0
0
558
1980 2000
NONRES NONRES 1980 2000
0 0.0 0.
0 0.0 0.
0 7. 14.
0 0. 0.
7 6. 12.
0 1. 4.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
0 4. 2).
0 1. ).
0 0. 5.
0 2. 16.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
0 3. 6.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 1.
0 0. 2.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
31 1. 2.
0 0. 1.
0 0. 2.
0 0. 0.
0 2. 2.
0 4. 8.
0 6. 14.
01 0. 3.
0 0. 0.
0 12. 14.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
0 1. 6.
0 0. 0.
0 2. 7.
0 1. 3.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
0 0. 0.
0 1. 3.
0 0. 0.
0 6. 5.
0 0 4. 8.
0 0 0. 0.
0 0 0. 0.
0 0 Q. 1.
0 0 0. 0.
0 0 1. 2.
0 0 1 . 3.
0 0 0. 0.
004. 4.
0 0 0. 0.
0 0 0. 0.
000. 2.
0 0 0. 0.
11 33 1. 4..
1980
0
2
59
5
294
31
4
0
0
20
5
3
32
1
0
3
178
1
7
2
0
1
54
9
0
5
39
136
23
2
1
51
3
2
25
4
125
34
3
0
3
30
0
"I
1
33
g
70
o
; 3
1 g
1 Q
o
I g
t 1,600
2000
2
3
84
12
617
31
14
4
0
76
8
T
86
10
2
6
228
2
18
37
7
12
93
55
7
15
50
192
44
38
2
86
31
19
39
4
226
40
8
0
9
40
8
*4*f
7
J
117
24
Q
J
Q
2
Q
2,740
37
-------
TABLE 15
POPULATIONS SERVED BY RAW DISCHARGE
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 15 summarizes populations served by sewerage authorities that collect
wastewater and discharge the wastewater to the environment as a raw waste.
The wastewater is not subjected to any treatment beyond what is considered
preliminary treatment. Preliminary treatment would include comminution,
screening, grit removal, etc., but not primary sedimentation. For this
reason, all the populations are listed under the Not Receiving Treatment
category.
Also summarized for each State and the nation as a whole is the number of
sewerage authorities utilizing raw discharge as a method of wastewater
disposal. In 1982 there were 237 communities discharging raw waste. By the
year 2000 all these communities will have built treatment facilities or
interceptors to neighboring facilities to eliminate the raw discharge.
38
-------
DECEMBER SI.
TABLE IS
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY RAH DISCHARGE
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
(POPULATION IN THOUSANDS)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I DMA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTAL
I960
TOTAL
5,890
400
2,718
2,286
23,669
2,889
3,108
595
638
9,740
5,464
965
944
11,418
5,490
2,913
2,363
3,661
4,204
1,125
4,216
5,757
9,258
4,077
2,521
4,917
787
1,570
799
921
7,564
1,300
17,577
5,874
653
10,797
3,025
2.633
11,867
»47
3,119
690
4,591
14,228
1,461
511
5,346
4,130
1,950
4,705
450
33
110
17
3,197
118
99
230,075
2000
TOTAL
4,140
694
4,357
2,970
26,786
4,371
3,902
841
(94
15,049
7,053
,366
,183
1 ,358
,059
,101
,642
,224
,8%0
,222
,583
6.736
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,379
938
,734
,408
,306
,022
,781
19,683
7,419
690
12,237
3,702
3,209
12,854
1,084
3,700
730
5,573
21,000
1,963
607
6,755
4,859
2,101
5,553
484
40
275
33
4,700
183
IK
278,888
1980 2000
RES. RES.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1980
NONRES
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
NONRES
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1980
RES.
4
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
8
0
0
4
1
0
0
190
28
98
0
210
3
5
4
1
0
0
0
65
12
0
900
1
0
0
0
0
78
8
7
0
0
1
1
0
98
0
0
0
0
0
86
0
0
1,876
2000
RES.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TREATMENT * * rtKCENI mam
SERVED
1980 2000
NONRES NONRES 1980 2000
0 0 0.1 0.0
0 0 5.2 0.0
0 0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0.0 0.0
000.
000.
000.
000.
25 0 0.
000.
o a o.
000.
000.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00
3 0
0 0
27 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
343 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.
00 .0
00 .0 .
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0.0
1 0.6 .0
0 0.8 .0
0 0.2 0.0
1 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 0.2 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 5.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
o o.o o.o
0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 2.7 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0
404 0.8 0.0
mm iREAintni mm
PLANTS
1980 2000
>
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
0
1
6
1
0
0
4
1
50
0
15
3
10
3
4
0
0
0
14
1
0
18
1
0
2
0
0
36 0
2 0
4 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
28 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
217 0
39
-------
TABLE 16
POPULATIONS SERVED BY FACILITIES DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 16 summarizes 1980 populations served by facilities that treat the
collected wastes to a degree less than what is defined as secondary
treatment and discharge the wastes to surface waters.
Facilities included in this summary provide primary or advanced primary
treatment (comminution, screening, grit removal, etc.) plus primary
sedimentation. Chlorination may or may not be a unit process. Advanced
primary treatment facilities may provide some biological treatment, but are
unable to treat wastewater to the degree necessary to comply with EPA's
definition of secondary treatment.
Also summarized for each State and the nation is the number of facilities
providing less than secondary treatment.
The terms total population, resident, nonresident, receiving treatment, not
receiving treatment, and percent served are defined in the discussion
provided for Table 12.
40
-------
DECENIEI St.
TABLE 1*
1*62
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY FACILITIES DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED. RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
(POPULATION IN THOUSANDS)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. Of COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOUA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
HASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MIHNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
HEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTAL
»« POPUL
1*80
TOTAL
3,8*0
400
2,718
2,286
23, tt*
2,88*
3,108
3*5
658
»,740
3,464
965
*44
11,418
5,4*0
2,*13
2,345
3,661
4,204
1,125
4,216
5,737
9,258
4,077
2,521
4,917
787
1,570
79*
921
7,3t4
1.300
17,577
5,874
655
10,7*7
3.025
2,655
11,867
947
3.11*
690
4,5*1
14,228
1.461
511
5,34t
4.130
1.V50
4,705
450
33
110
17
3.1*7
118
**
230.075
2000
TOTAL
4,140
694
4.357
2,970
26,786
4.371
3,902
841
694
15.04*
7.053
1,566
1,183
12.358
4.059
3,101
2,642
4.224
4.880
1.222
5.583
6,756
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,379
938
1,734
1,408
1,506
*,022
1,781
19,685
7,41*
690
12,237
3.702
3,20*
12.SS4
1.084
3.700
730
5.573
21.000
1,963
4,'s59
2,101
5,553
484
40
275
33
4,700
183
lit
278,888
1*80
RES.
123
130
596
494
8,853
112
332
12
0
103
147
498
123
355
54
726
725
77
424
94
74
2,278
459
178
173
1,495
46
529
17
158
1,355
24
3,7*5
151
10
l,04t
430
33
1,771
280
184
12*
102
452
0
lot
822
1,258
221
1*3
80
1
58
1
1,662
2
53
55,604
2000
RES.
0
317
0
0
9,010
0
0
0
0
0
0
667
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,t30
1*80 2000 1*80
NONRES NONRES RES.
11
a
a
5
577 33
1
1
21
0
22
11
43 6
1
1
0
30
4
0
3
26
3
41
3
4
1
342
0
1
0
13
31*
1
949
2
0
4
0
0
107
39
2
2
0
IS
45
14
42
27t
2
78
a
0
11
48
105
11
t
1
34
Sf
20
56
to
1*
392
112
10
tl
58
2
a
0
«4
94
7
235
51
0
74
32
4
138
34
tl
0
35
40 44
00 0
17 0 2*
35 0 10*
538 330 158
a o 57
2* a la
00 0
00 27
a o 21
oo a
0 0 916
00 1
30 8
3,246 740 3,796
2000 1980 2000
RES. NONRES NONRES
a
a
a
a
90
a
0
a
a
a
a
0
0
0
o
a
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
a
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
000
000
000
020
000
a a
a* o
0 0
a o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
98 29 0
«« PERCENT ««"
SERVED
1980 2000
j.
32.
14.
21.
37.
3.
10.
2.
0.
1.
2 .
51.
13.
JB
0,
24.
30.
2 1
10.
8.
1 1
39.
4,
4.
t.
30.
5 ,
33.
2.
17.
18.
1.
21.
2,
1.
9.
14.
I f
14.
2*.
5 (
18.
2 .
4 f
a.
20.
15.
30.
11.
J.
17.
4.
53.
8.
52.
2.
0.0
45. t
0.0
0.0
33. t
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
13.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
53.5 0.0
14. t 3.8
«« TREATMENT »
PLANTS
1*80 2000
24
t
13
173
58
13
*
t
0
*
44 0
10 2
tS 0
122 0
It 0
337 0
154 0
14 0
76 0
It 0
19 0
13 0
41 0
123 0
85 0
245 0
30 0
4* 0
5 0
18 0
67 0
8 0
11* 0
32 0
20 0
at o
1*7 0
5 0
50 0
t 0
74 0
137 0
2* 0
83 0
0 0
21 0
98 0
72 2
45 0
104 0
35 0
2 0
2 0
2 0
27 0
1 0
2 0
3,11* 12
41
-------
TABLE 17
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1982
FACILITIES DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT
Table 17 summarizes the performance of all treatment facilities designed to
provide less than secondary treatment. Information is provided as a total
for all States and U.S. Territories with a national total at the bottom of
the table.
This table is designed to estimate the quantities of various pollutants
accepted by a treatment plant and the quantities of these same pollutants in
the effluent. Quantities are given in metric tons per day for all
parameters. BOD^ and Solids are summarized in this table. No information
is given for nutrient removal because these constituents are not removed in
significant amounts by this degree of treatment.
These data were derived from the daily average flow, daily average influent
concentrations, and the daily average effluent concentrations. The averages
are based on the actual performance of each individual treatment plant for
the most recent 12 month period for which information could be obtained.
The values calculated for each plant are summed into State and national
totals. The main source of information for flow and concentration values
was the self-monitoring reports submitted by every facility with a NPDES
permit.
Included in this summary are plants designed to provide primary or advanced
primary treatment. Excluded are facilities designed to consistently provide
secondary or better degrees of treatment, as well as any with efficiencies
less than primary.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day. The influent and
effluent BOD5 and Solids values are State totals in metric tons per day.
Table 17 is an extension of Table 16. A summary of the projected year 2000
performance of facilities designed to provide less than secondary treatment
is given on Table 18.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD,- or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
42
-------
DECENBEI SI. 1*82
TABLE 17
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADIN6S, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1982
FACILITIES DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
««««it«««ii«««ii«it» REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES «»«««*«»»»ii»««»«
11*1111 IIII UK SOLIDS «»*
X
INFLUENT EFFLUENT REH.
ACTUAL
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I OH A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEN YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
FLOW
54
108
112
228
4,224
50
218
10
0
52
77
335
115
207
34
386
367
46
lit
87
38
2.147
326
89
121
998
24
317
12
135
801
8
2,976
98
2
<15
177
19
1.333
278
107
54
69
295
0
100
365
887
105
89
49
1
31
2
475
0
17
X
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
9
16
27
62
1,242
12
32
2
0
11
13
50
21
49
5
118
104
12
32
23
8
336
89
30
23
227
3
99
2
27
193
2
392
23
1
113
37
3
227
22
19
16
13
69
Q
22
64
183
30
23
10
0
7
0
124
0
3
5
12
4
10
594
2
18
1
0
3
3
32
4
16
2
38
39
7
10
9
3
233
16
4
4
139
1
76
0
17
108
1
150
3
0
42
7
0
94
13
8
j
5
14
Q
27
104
11
7
2
0
7
0
52
0
3
REM.
49.2
25.1
83.2
83.3
52.1
85.4
45.1
64.0
0.0
75.7
76.8
35.2
78.8
66.3
60.3
67.4
62.3
44.9
68.1
61.7
63.3
30.7
81.4
85.3
83.8
38.6
60.7
22.9
86.7
37.1
44.0
53.3
61.8
86.8
81.8
62.6
81.7
86.1
58.5
41.7
59.7
81 .3
61 .6
78.9
0 0
59ls
'58.2
43.3
63.7
67.0
77.4
3.1
0.0
68.7
57.7
80.0
14.9
U.S. TOTALS
20.063
4,280
1.975 53.8
10
22
27
59
1.458
12
38
2
0
10
12
48
19
53
3
131
87
17
36
24
6
357
72
24
23
294
3
106
2
29
143
2
362
22
1
108
38
3
299
35
22
15
12
65
0
14
60
197
27
IB
9
0
8
0
105
0
4
5
10
5
27
449
1
12
1
0
2
3
19
5
14
1
33
22
5
12
10
2
183
17
5
8
109
1
43
0
11
57
1
147
3
0
35
9
1
97
14
7
3
4
15
0
6
14
74
7
5
2
0
8
0
31
0
2
45.1
54.3
82.6
54.0
69.1
89.3
69.2
71.6
0.0
74.9
77.3
60.0
72.3
74.3
71.3
74.4
74.5
68.7
66.3
56.1
70.0
48.7
77.0
81.5
65.5
62.9
74.1
59.7
83.3
63.6
60.3
53.2
59.4
85.6
85.0
67.5
75.5
76.9
67.7
58.8
66.3
76.3
65.7
77.1
0.0
58.0
76.4
62.5
73.2
72.5
73.1
4.7
0.0
41.6
70.2
80.0
44.4
4.553
1.558 65.7
NOTES. 1. FLOW IN CUBIC METERS X 1000 PER DAY. 2. SHORT TONS METRIC TONS X 0.9072.
3. SUN OF ENTRIES HAY NOY EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS.
43
-------
TABLE 18
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES TO BE IN OPERATION IN 2000
FACILITIES DESIGNED FOR LESS THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT
Table 18 summarizes the expected performance in the year 2000 of all
treatment facilities designed to provide less than secondary treatment
Information is provided as a total for all States and U.S. Territories with
a national total at the bottom of the table.
This table is designed to estimate the quantities of various pollutants that
will be received by a treatment plant and the quantities of these same
pollutants that will be in the effluent in 2000. Quantities are given in
metric tons per day for all parameters. BOD, and Solids are summarized in
this table. No information is given for ntitrient removal because these
constituents are not removed in significant amounts by this degree of
treatment.
These data were derived from the daily average flow, daily average influent
concentrations, and the daily average effluent concentrations. The averages
are based on the predicted year 2000 situation. The values calculated for
each plant are summed into State and national totals.
Included in this summary are plants designed to provide primary or advanced
primary treatment. Such plants will be allowed to exist in the year 2000
according to specific new provisions in the Clean Water Act. An example of
this is the ocean discharge waivers permitted by Section 301(h) allowing
less than secondary facilities to discharge to the ocean under certain
conditions. Excluded are facilities designed to consistently provide
secondary or better degrees of treatment, as well as those with efficiencies
less than primary.
Table 18 is an extension of Tables 16 and 17.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day. The influent and
effluent BOD,- and Solids values are projected State totals in metric tons
per day.
44
-------
DECEMBER 11,
TABLE 18
1982
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADINGS. REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES TO BE IN OPERATION IN 2000
FACILITIES CESIGNED FOR LESS THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
»*K«x««i.<««««*»«x REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES «»»«*M*
««»K«K«> SOLIDS ««***»«
X
INFLUENT EFFLUENT REM.
PROJECTED
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOUA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
HEM MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
FLOW
0
156
0
0
4,104
0
0
0
0
0
0
405
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
477
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0
23
0
0
1,293
0
0
0
0
0
0
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
o
0
0
136
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
0
505
0
0
0
0
0
0
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
REN.
0.0
19.9
0.0
0.0
60.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
52.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
0.0
0 . 0
0.0
0.0
30.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
31
0
0
1,459
0
0
0
0
0
0
81
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
169
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
389
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
73.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
44.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
58.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
U.S. TOTALS 5,543 1,568 674 57.0 1,739 519 70.1
NOTES: 1. FLOW IN CUBIC METERS X 1000 PER DAY. 2. SHORT TONS - METRIC TONS X 0.9072.
3. SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOY EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS.
45
-------
TABLE 19
POPULATIONS SERVED BY SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 19 summarizes the 1980 populations served and the 2000 populations
projected to be served by facilities designed to provide secondary
treatment. In general, this type of facility includes some type of
preliminary treatment process followed by a biological process (trickling
filter, activated sludge, rotating biological contactor, etc.) with no
additional treatment processes except disinfection.
The 2000 total State population values reported are from estimates provided
by BEA. The 1980 total State population values are based on the 1980
populations reported in the April 1981 Report of the Bureau of Census. The
Percent Served is a function of the residents receiving treatment in
relation to the total State population.
The total population within the service area of an authority is the sum of
persons receiving treatment and not receiving treatment. Those persons not
receiving treatment reside in the service area but do not contribute to the
treatment facility because they are not on a sewer system.
Resident populations are permanent residents in the service area of a
sewerage authority. Nonresident populations include commuters living in one
area and working in another, as well as all transients, tourists, and
seasonal residents.
Also summarized for each State and the nation is the number of secondary
facilities in operation in 1982 and the number expected to be operational in
2000.
46
-------
DECEMBER Jl, 1*12
TABLE 1*
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
(POPULATION IN THOUSANDS)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. Of COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO.
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTAL
« POPUL
1*80
TOTAL
3,190
400
2,718
2,286
23,669
2,889
3.108
595
638
9,740
5,464
965
944
11,418
5,490
2,913
2.363
3.661
4,204
1,125
4,216
5,737
9,258
4,077
2,521
4,917
787
1.570
799
921
7.364
1.300
17,577
5,874
653
10,797
3,025
2,633
11,867
947
3,119
690
4,591
14,228
1,461
511
5,346
4,130
1,950
4,705
450
33
110
17
3.197
118
99
230,075
2000
TOTAL
4,140
694
4,357
2,970
26,786
4,371
3,902
841
694
15,049
7,053
1,366
1,183
12,358
6,059
3,101
2,642
4,224
4,880
1,222
5,583
6,736
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,379
938
1,734
1,408
1,106
9,<)22
1,781
19,683
7,419
690
12,237
3,702
3,209
12,854
1.084
3,700
730
5,573
21,000
1,963
607
6,755
4,859
2,101
5,553
484
40
275
33
4,700
183
116
278,888
1980 2000 1980 2000
RES. RES. NONRES NONRES
1,541 1,990 8? 163
63 322 2 13
1,610 3,463 50 32
545 1,224 12 2
3,584 6,091 136 427
1,240
1,431
88
0
2,572
2,501
70
266
1,513
918
1,231
945
1,280
2,171
450
497
1,133
366
2,512
1,240
1,980
400
651
231
231
3,830
711
6,514
1.381
421
3,033
1,034
376
4,540
337
869
279
1,420
5,454
1,006
108
729
620
352
923
245
0
7
0
94
7
26
67,609
1.931
2,261
10
0
4,891
1.654
488
514
508
796
1.682
2.202
1.817
4,021
857
288
4,403
4S9
1,103
961
4,935
650
1,565
462
737
5,367
1,170
12,436
1,391
536
1,494
1.996
202
4,236
710
2.015
338
1,414
8,939
0
2.2?!
3,185
1.473
947
423
32
196
2
3,137
70
128
106,417
70
12
30
0
373
107
40
7
1
10
44
12
40
65
57
98
9
15
7
329
30
13
18
33
623
9
1,280
172
0
8
1
19
261
8
190
7
30
104
181
18
59
53
16
24
15
0
0
Q
0
o
0
4.817
129
35
51
0
588
63
155
33
5
15
63
20
45
99
124
317
147
19
11
11
1.183
34
21
32
154
1,253
14
3,089
262
1
9
10
11
684
67
291
4
13
"i
29
138
363
22
80
25
1
3
0
0
2
3
10,611
««« NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT ««
1980 2000 1980 2000
RES. RES. NONRES NONRES
209 42
17 14
108 39
23 0
192 5
10
624
31
0
1,110
390
39
33
11
43
53
60
214
155
149
98
512
110
103
174
90
11
26
2
130
436
68
1,434
697
0
272
69
55
491
212
310
1
420
274
16
41
86
58
67
57
1
0
j
Q
175
33
22
10,049
0
337
0
0
265
77
0
0
Q
1
1
0
0
21
520
66
11
45
1
0
0
0
162
86
2
538
312
0
4
18
Q
98
69
65
0
46
I
50
24
65
5
13
Q
2
12
Q
745
39
7
o
30
o
o
o
1
1
2
33
1
o
1
o
o
o
o
10
44
o
41
o
11
o
1
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
3
o
13
0
o
Q
o
n
Q
g
0
225
Q
53
Q
o
o
o
o
o
o
19
6
Q
0
14
0
0
0
4
0
3
0
0
0
Q
o
D
0
Q
0
Q
103
«« PERCENT null «« TREATMENT «
SERVED PLANTS
1980 2000
1980 2000
192
37
31
60
158
222
66
8
0
101
294
14
38
295
175
322
224
154
209
76
71
76
145
343
219
287
87
267
12
44
132
41
206
406
234
278
144
69
321
12
143
91
157
53
79
134
7»
250
55
0
2
0
5
4
3
7.946 Hi
221
119
83
128
218
237
51
4
0
95
250
34
105
407
142
703
349
146
316
155
7S
94
196
399
221
576
130
273
21
93
71
66
521
254
256
154
327
6*
714
19
157
221
16
,512
0
62
201
290
402
276
84
1
3
1
26
16
5
756
47
-------
TABLE 20
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1982
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SECONDARY TREATMENT
Table 20 summarizes the performance of all treatment facilities designed to
provide secondary treatment. Information is provided for all States and
U.S. Territories with a national total at the bottom of the table.
This table provides estimates of the total quantity of BOD^ and Solids
accepted by treatment plants within the State and the total quantity of
these same pollutants in the effluent. Quantities are given in metric tons
per day for these parameters. Quantities of nutrients removed are not
summarized in this table because, by definition, secondary treatment plants
do not have the capability for nutrient removal.
These data were derived from the daily average flow and the daily average
influent and effluent BODr and Solids concentrations. The averages are
based on the actual performances of each individual treatment plant during
the most recent 12 month period for which information could be obtained.
The values calculated for each plant are summed into State and national
totals. The main source of information for flow and concentration values
was the self-monitoring reports submitted by every facility with an NPDES
permit.
Included in this summary are plants designed to provide secondary treatment.
Excluded are facilities designed to consistently provide less than, or
better than, secondary treatment.
Table 20 is an extension of Table 19. A summary of the projected year 2000
performance of secondary facilities is given in Table 21.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD5 or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
48
-------
DECEMBER 31,
TABLE 20
1182 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADINGS. RENOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1982
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SECONDARY TREATMENT
(NETRIC TONS PER DAY)
«»»ititiiii««iHi«iiii*it RENOVAL EFFICIENCIES *»«itit«it«»itit»ititiiit
1*82
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAHARE
DIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAUAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I OH A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
HASHINGTON
HEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
HYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
ACTUAL
FLOH
920
44
(44
333
1.651
543
1,015
3(
0
2.832
1.591
43
1(4
1,107
1,485
(95
411
714
977
279
391
773
220
1.309
595
1.130
219
317
101
1(8
2,158
284
4. (19
925
13(
2,028
421
383
2, (81
200
590
125
1.144
2.737
(77
(3
4(7
410
1(2
556
122
0
2
0
41
0
««v««ii«iiii BODS K»««IHHI«»
X
INFLUENT EFFLUENT REN.
155
7
122
78
454
130
1(1
12
0
472
317
10
47
1((
271
259
8(
110
191
59
103
147
38
324
119
223
41
75
20
40
709
58
593
197
32
420
88
89
435
5C
170
33
413
573
101
12
113
85
34
142
24
0
0
0
12
0
1
18
2
15
10
44
13
19
1
0
47
44
1
3
19
25
28
11
34
30
7
29
31
5
41
It
45
7
6
3
5
394
10
125
20
3
120
11
10
(7
(
40
3
47
57
13
1
8
9
11
14
7
0
0
0
2
0
0
88.1
79.1
87. (
87.0
90.3
89.7
88.3
92.8
0.0
90.1
86.0
87.9
93.9
88. (
90.9
89.1
87. (
(8.9
84.1
87.5
72.0
78.9
86.1
87.3
86.7
79.7
83.3
88.7
86.5
88.2
44.5
82.9
76.8
89.7
92.0
71.3
87. (
88. (
84.5
87.2
76.2
89.7
88.5
90.0
8(.9
89.5
92. (
89.1
(9.0
90.0
72.5
0.0
92.5
0.0
85.9
87.2
84.9
«lll)«*lt«v SOLIDS *»»»«««»
%
INFLUENT EFFLUENT REN.
154
7
13(
77
475
118
1(4
10
0
510
295
10
4(
207
294
209
91
140
201
73
110
1(5
43
398
133
2(9
34
76
22
34
800
(2
(39
201
30
544
85
89
527
37
124
30
4(5
5(9
102
15
106
81
35
115
25
0
0
0
12
0
1
27
2
15
14
48
13
39
2
0
(1
74
1
3
22
19
31
12
31
37
11
25
33
4
42
23
44
7
9
3
4
3(7
9
127
26
4
M*
12
16
9(
11
27
3
70
ft
1
14
9
7
12
7
0
0
0
2
0
0
82.3
77.2
88.9
81.2
89.9
88.5
76.5
77.5
0.0
87.9
74.8
89.0
94.0
89.2
93.4
85.1
B(.4
78.0
81.4
84.4
76.8
79.8
90.2
89.4
82.7
83.7
79.3
88.3
87.7
88.9
54.1
85.4
80.1
87.1
86.1
79.3
85.8
81.8
81. (
(9.9
78.0
89.3
84.9
84. (
8S.3
91.4
87.1
88.3
80.8
89. (
73.0
0.0
9(.0
0.0
87.2
82.0
85.0
U.S. TOTALS 41.(71 8.(23 1,539 82.1 9.197 l.(93 81.5
NOTES: 1. FLOH IN CUBIC METERS X 1000 PER DAY. 2. SHORT TONS . METRIC TONS X 0.9072.
3. SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOY EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS.
49
-------
TABLE 21
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES PROJECTED FOR 2000
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SECONDARY TREATMENT
Table 21 summarizes the expected performance in the year 2000 of all
treatment facilities designed to provide secondary treatment. Information
is provided for all States and U.S. Territories with a national total at the
bottom of the table.
This table provides an estimate of the total quantity of BOD,- and Solids
that will be received by treatment plants within the State and the total
quantity of these same pollutants that will be in the effluent in 2000.
Quantities are given in metric tons per day for these parameters.
Quantities of nutrients removed are not summarized in this table because, by
definition, secondary treatment plants do not have the capability for
nutrient removal.
These data were derived from the daily average flow and the daily average
influent and effluent BOD5 and Solids concentrations. The averages are
based on the predicted year 2000 situation. The values calculated for each
plant are summed into State and national totals.
Included in this summary are plants designed to provide secondary treatment.
Excluded are facilities designed to consistently provide less than, or
greater than, secondary treatment.
Table 21 is an extension of Tables 19 and 20.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic-meters per day.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD5 or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
50
-------
DECEMBER 11,
TABLE 21
1*82
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
PUNT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE KATES
FOR FACILITIES PROJECTED FOR 2000
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SECONDARY TREATMENT
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
*»»*»x*7
13
30
f
21
114
It
2*2
10
5
24
22
8
82
1*
36
4
15
89
0
40
55
22
20
f
1
3
g
18
2
1.927
PER DAY.
Bt.O
84.2
St. 8
87.5
8*.*
88.2
84.*
87.7
0.0
86.0
86.1
87.1
89.7
85.0
85.9
92.1
87.8
86.7
86.7
87.1
88.9
85.2
85.8
90.5
85.1
St. 8
81. f
91.5
85.8
90.2
90.5
85.7
81.5
88.4
90.2
8*. 8
89.6
90.6
85.2
88.0
88.4
87.*
90.' 2
0.0
85.1
Sf .4
87. *
85.2
86.8
86 . 1
90.9
85 . 0
85,7
8*. 2
87 . 3
87. *7
87. f
2. SI
UENT
5*
f
18
18
**
27
47
0
0
81
11
7
10
7
If
12
17
11
fl
If
a
115
f
If
17
>7
11
30
f
21
114
It
2*2
10
5
24
22
8
82
1*
If
4
15
89
0
3
40
55
22
20
f
1
1
0
18
1
2
cnuvAL tf
*
REN.
St.O
84.2
St. 8
87.5
8*.*
88.2
84.*
87.7
0.0
86.0
86.1
87.1
8*. 7
85.0
85. *
92.1
87.8
86.7
86.7
87.1
88.*
85.2
85. 8
90.5
85.1
St. 8
81. f
*1.5
85.8
90.2
90.5
85.7
81.5
88.4
90.2
8*. 8
89.6
90.6
85.2
88.0
88.4
87.*
90.' 2
0.0
85.1
St. 4
87.*
85.2
St. 8
86.1
90.9
85.0
85.7
8*. 2
87.3
87.7
rikienbies
INFLUENT
426
40
282
146
8*7
214
324
4
0
til
210
52
102
56
124
128
118
281
488
167
ft
869
48
If*
lit
771
81
151
42
187
1,22*
114
1.9J2
240
51
266
222
81
602
141
271
10
915
0
2!
2**
44f
155
If*
45
4
22
0
117
7
14
SOLIDS Mm
EFFLUENT
to
*
40
1*
100
27
47
0
0
81
34
7
10
7
If
1*
41
15
68
21
*
14*
f
1*
1*
104
17
12
t
21
113
17
2*2
11
f
2f
12
12
82
1*
37
4
56
114
j
40
56
22
21
S
1
1
0
18
1
2
X
REH.
85. f
S4.1
85.9
Bt.7
88.8
87.1
85. f
88.1
0.0
87.1
81.8
87.0
90.2
86.8
86.8
BB.l
87. B
87.5
86.0
87.5
86.0
82.8
St. 5
88.5
81.5
St. 5
79.6
90.9
84.*
88.8
»0.7
85. 5
84.8
87.1
88.1
90.3
85.4
85.6
86.5
St.l
86.5
Bt.l
90.8
87.5
0 0
85.2
86.4
87.1
85.5
87.5
81.1
BO.O
86.7
65.7
87.*
87.3
8S.B
1. SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOY ECUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS.
51
-------
TABLE 22
NUMBER OF PLANTS PROJECTED FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT BY YEAR 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
Table 22 is a flow summary for all secondary treatment plants projected to
be in operation by the year 2000. In general, this type of treatment plant
includes some type of preliminary treatment process followed by a biological
process (trickling filter, activated sludge, rotating biological contactor,
etc.) with no additional treatment processes except disinfection. A summary
is provided for each State and U.S. Territory. National totals are
summarized at the bottom of the table.
In the second column the total number of projected secondary treatment
plants in each State is reported. Column three represents the total
wastewater treatment capacity of the plant in thousand cubic meters per day.
The projected design flow for each plant was used to calculate the total
treatment capacity value.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the State totals into seven flow
ranges. The ranges specified in the column headings are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses beneath the headings, in
million gallons per day. Reported for each flow range are the number of
plants in the range and the percentage of the total State secondary
treatment capacity that is accounted for by each flow range.
Included in this summary are all secondary plants in operation in 1982 which
will not be abandoned or upgraded between 1982 and 2000, primary and
advanced primary plants which will be upgraded to secondary before 2000, and
new secondary plants which will be constructed prior to 2000.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the number of
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. This occurs
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value is less
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
52
-------
DECEMBER St.
TABLE 22
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF PLANTS PROJECTED FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT BY YEAR 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOM)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
HEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMIK'C
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
TOTAL
PLANTS
221
119
83
128
218
237
58
4
0
55
250
34
105
407
142
703
349
146
386
155
75
94
196
399
221
576
130
273
21
93
78
66
528
254
256
154
327
69
714
19
157
221
86
1,582
0
62
201
290
402
276
84
1
3
1
26
16
5
TOTAL
DESIGN
FLOW
1.961
196
1.271
606
3.348
886
1.633
13
0
2.709
1.051
225
331
237
545
1.063
1.241
1,171
2.102
608
263
3,830
218
645
565
3.249
429
996
203
700
3,814
541
9,850
1,020
198
825
951
254
2,748
649
1,212
126
1,160
4,210
0
111
1.346
1,820
747
65ci
210
£3
94
0
1,268
28
51
0-.4 .401-1.9 1.901-4 4.001-19 19.001-40 40.001-190 190.001*
(0-.10) (.11-. 50) (.51-1.05) (1.06-5.01) (5.02-10.56) (10.57-50.19) (50.2*)
X X X X X X X
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOM PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOM PLANTS FLOW
49 0.6 100 5.0 26 4.1 31 14.2 5 6.0 9 32.3 I 37.4
7 6.5 13 5.6 6 8.5 11 44.5 2 34.5 0 0.0 0 0.0
13 0.2 44 3.1 10 2.2 8 5.3 2 4.2 5 40.2 1 44.6
60 2.0 39 6.0 11 4.7 11 17.8 2 12.4 5 56.6 0 0.0
*« 0.2 60 1.7 28 2.4 45 11.9 19 16. 19 38.1 3 29.3
80 '» 83 6.4 28 8.9 37 30.2 5 17. 4 33.0 0 0.0
2 0.0 6 0.4 5 0.9 23 15.3 13 26. 8 43.1 I 13.9
1 1.1 2 13.3 0 0.0 1 85.5 00. 0 0.0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 00. 0 0.0 0 0.0
* 0.0 17 0.4 3 0.3 13 5.8 44. 6 12.8 6 76.0
72 1.5 106 9.7 35 9.2 29 24.6 38. 5 46.6 0 0.0
2 0.2 6 5.0 8 9.5 13 54.9 3 30. 0 0.0 0 0.0
17 2.5 40 11. 11 8.4 13 35.3 3 22. 1 19.4 0 0.0
224 20.9 169 59. 12 14.1 2 5.2 00. 0 0.0 0 0.0
53 2.2 56 9. 11 6.2 15 25.2 4 20. 3 36.4 0 0.0
483 7.8 175 13. 15 3.7 19 12.6 5 12. 6 49.5 0 0.0
"2 2.3 138 10. 24 4.7 30 21.3 11 24. 3 20.4 1 15.8
5* 1-2 56 4. 8 2.0 11 6.7 37. 5 25.0 2 53.3
141 1.4 1J2 5. 45 6.1 50 20.2 9 10. 7 24.6 2 31.4
47 !* 54 8. 17 7.6 31 39.2 29. 4 33.2 0 0.0
3* 2.5 26 9. 6 7.1 6 20.7 1 11. 2 48.2 0 0.0
* °-° 21 0. 14 1.0 33 8.6 64. 8 21.3 4 63.8
»1 ' *4 34. 12 14.8 6 25.4 1 15. 0 0.0 0 0.0
239 7. 118 16. 19 6.0 16 20.2 4 17. 3 30.6 0 0.0
106 3. 67 10. 22 10.9 20 28.3 5 27. 1 19.6 0 0.0
282 I- 162 4. 66 5.7 47 13.6 86. 8 27.3 3 39.8
56 2. 42 8. 15 9.4 9 15.3 4 26. 2 37.0 0 0.0
150 2. 81 6. 16 4.4 19 15.8 39. 3 33.5 1 26.5
81. 7 3.7 0 0.0 4 12.8 1 12. 1 69.5 0 0.0
1» 0. 36 5.3 10 3.8 22 27.6 2 9.0 3 25.1 I 28.1
1 O'O 12 0.3 7 0.6 28 7.3 12 9.3 15 32.7 3 49.6
27 0.8 13 2.4 11 6.6 10 15.1 4 21.3 0 0.0 1 53.5
170 0.3 191 1.7 63 1.8 57 5.2 18 5.1 14 11.3 15 74.2
11* 1- 73 6.8 22 6.3 29 26.6 10 27.1 4 31.5 0 0.0
204 12- 40 15.0 4 5.4 4 14.6 4 51.8 0 0.0 0 0.0
*' 1- " 6.5 16 5.1 19 21.1 3 8.7 0 0.0 1 55.0
1*1 2. 120 11.0 31 9.3 27 22.5 6 17.6 I 12.5 1 23.6
}0 2. 27 10.7 6 6.6 5 20.3 0 0.0 1 59.5 0 0.0
292 2. 25* 8.4 70 7.2 61 25.3 9 8.9 4 11.9 2 35.8
,J 0.1 2 0.4 1 0.4 7 11.8 1 6.0 3 34.4 1 46.6
iff i\:\ K ,J:f >f J:S *? IS:,' 'j 'j.-j j »j:j j
H >:! 44i iM ,« ,:? »K &* 2| }f:| ,g ,j:5 * »:j
0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 00
26 5.2 22 17.9 7 18.6 7 58.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 000
*7 1-1 66 6.7 17 3.7 18 10.3 3 5.6 10 72.3 0 0.0
1 1-0 110 5.6 27 4.1 53 28.5 10 15.1 8 30.4 1 14.9
141 4.4 194 25. 2 43 15.9 18 16.0 4 IS. 5 2 24.8 0 00
'35 4.0 95 13.5 19 7.5 21 30.2 3 13.7 3 30.8 0 0.0
*$ 2-7 20 8.8 5 6.5 13 69.3 1 12.5 0 0.0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 99.9 0 0.0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 4.2 0 0.0 2 95.7 0 00
0 0.0 1 99.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 00
0 0.0 1 0.0 5 1.1 7 3.9 4 9.7 8 63.5 I 21.4
4 3.4 7 16.5 3 32.0 2 47.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
0 0.0 1 1.7 0 0.0 3 55.6 1 42.6 0 0.0 0 0.0
U.S. TOTALS 11.756 66,234 5,146 1.4 3,881 S.4 1.015 4.S 1,178 15.7 262 11.2
NOTES] 1. FLOH RANGE VALUES IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000. (APPROXIMATE N6D IN PARENTHESES).
2. TOTAL STATE FLOW IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000.
220 26.9
54 34.8
53
-------
TABLE 23
NUMBER OF NEW SECONDARY TREATMENT PLANTS TO BE BUILT BETWEEN 1982 AND 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
Table 23 is a flow summary for all new secondary treatment plants which will
be constructed between 1982 and 2000. In general, this type of treatment
plant includes some type of preliminary treatment process followed by a
biological process (trickling filter, activated sludge, rotating biological
contactor, etc.) with no additional treatment processes except disinfection.
A summary is provided for each State and U.S. Territory. National totals
are summarized at the bottom of the table.
In the second column the total number of new secondary treatment plants to
be constructed in each State is reported. Column three represents the total
wastewater treatment capacity of the plants in thousand cubic meters per
day. The projected design flow for each plant was used to calculate the
total treatment capacity value.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the State totals into seven flow
ranges. The ranges specified in the column headings are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses beneath the headings, in
million gallons per day. Reported for each flow range are the number of
plants in the range and the percentage of the State secondary capacity that
is accounted for by each flow range.
Included in this summary are entirely new secondary plants which are planned
to be constructed by the year 2000. Excluded are secondary plants that were
operational in 1982 and any primary or advanced primary plants planned to be
upgraded to secondary treatment.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the number of
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. This occurs
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value is less
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
54
-------
DECEMBER 31. 1982
TABLE 23
1»82 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF NEW SECONDARY TREATMENT PLANTS TO BE BUILT BETNEEN 1*82 AND 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLON)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAHARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAUAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOUA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEU HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEU MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
0-.4
TOTAL
PLANTS
»7
7*
44
34
tO
15
5
2
0
25
73
20
It
135
47
UO
It
60
147
73
24
24
87
t4
»3
1<2
12
7
9
41
11
24
317
83
»
41
48
18
47*
5
47
.1!
0
14
83
103
308
to
11
0
0
1
2
11
0
TOTAL
DESIGN
FLOW
8(4
88
tt
8
nt
88
50
!2
u
147
70
71
14
it
15
21
S3
424
533
59
10
100
50
17
56
505
11
0
4
49
170
13
1.422
189
0
15
50
t,
4ti
15
129
5?!
0
5
347
142
298
41
17
0
0
0
41
9
0
(0-.
PLANTS
41
4}
8
31
30
9
1
1
0
5
37
2
9
114
37
ISt
11
52
97
39
19
4
49
54
72
14<
10
7
t
14
0
20
153
57
9
31
37
15
257
'!
15
t47
0
10
41
52
12t
42
»
0
0
0
0
4
0
10)
X
FLOH
1.2
10.4
l.t
47.5
3.4
l.t
0.1
1.3
0.0
0.4
11.8
O.t
12.0
St. 4
48.4
8t.O
2.7
2.8
3.7
14.0
32. t
0.5
24.0
49.4
18.9
4.3
It. 7
99.9
35.4
t.7
0.0
24.1
2.3
4.1
99.9
42.9
12.5
51.5
12.2
3.7
2.5
30.4
>.:i
0.0
3t.3
2.4
8.1
9.7
13.8
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.7
0.0
.401-1.9
(.11-. 50)
X
PLANTS
42
t
33
3
20
1
1
0
0
14
28
5
4
20
10
4
3
24
48
28
4
4
34
9
It
20
1
0
3
20
4
3
123
17
0
10
7
3
172
21
12
148
0
4
33
42
147
15
1
0
0
1
0
5
0
FLOH
3.7
5.5
43.7
32.4
9.8
O.t
1.3
0.0
0.0
t.9
2t.9
9.9
27.9
38.0
51.5
13.9
3.9
4.1
7.5
41.4
4t.3
10.9
54. t
39.5
21.4
3.5
4.1
0.0
44.5
35.7
2.5
13.9
4.8
7.1
0.0
57.0
10.0
48.4
30.9
0.0
It. 3
49.5
20.5
21.5
0.0
43.4
9.0
25.9
45.4
29.0
3.8
0.0
0.0
99.9
0.0
24.5
0.0
PLANTS AND PERCENT OF FLOH BY F10H RANEE
1.901-4 4.001-19 19.001-40
(.51-1.05)
X
PLANTS
5
1
2
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
t
t
1
1
0
0
0
1
9
3
1
2
4
1
1
5
0
0
0
3
1
3
17
2
0
0
1
0
27
0
2
0
2?
0
0
3
4
28
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
FLOH
1.8
2.4
7.4
0.0
5.5
4.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
21. t
22. t
17.7
5.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
4.2
It. 2
21.0
4.t
19.2
11.0
t.7
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
It. 3
1.7
41. 8
3.3
3.0
0.0
0.0
7.4
0.0
15.7
0.0
3.5
0.0
10.9
10. t
0.0
0.0
2.4
4.2
25.2
4.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.0
22.0
0.0
(1.04-5.01)
X
PLANTS
8
5
3
0
3
1
2
1
0
4
2
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
3
0
8
0
0
4
7
1
0
0
4
2
0
15
5
0
0
2
0
22
2
4
0
2
11
0
0
2
4
t
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
FLOH
8.2
38. t
44.9
0.0
9.t
5.4
38.3
98. t
0.0
35.2
39.5
44.7
42.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.9
28.2
0.0
54.4
0.0
0.0
52.8
14.9
79.1
0.0
0.0
41.2
10.1
0.0
8.3
22.8
0.0
0.0
23.4
0.0
54.7
9t.2
30.5
0.0
20. t
21.4
0.0
0.0
t.S
27.7
11.9
50. t
92.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
41.8
0.0
(5.02-10.54)
X
PLANTS
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
5
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
c
0
FLOH
0.0
42.9
0.0
0.0
30.9
34.0
to.i
0.0
0.0
18.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
93.3
t.O
7.4
0.0
0.0
27.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
54.1
0.0
9.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
4t.4
0.0
4.2
0.0
4t.9
0.0
41.2
4.1
0.0
0.0
t.S
0.0
7.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
90.9
0.0
0.0
40.001-190
(10.57-50.19)
tt
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.5
53.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
38. t
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10. t
24.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
31.4
0.0
8.4
42.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.1
0.0
0.0
73.0
31.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
190.001*
(50.2*)
«
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FLOH
84.9
0.0
0 .0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.7
37.2
0.0
0.0
0 .0
0.0
0. 0
0 .0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
tl.l
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
HASHINGTON
HEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
HYOtlNS
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 4,240 7,428 2,t79 t.4 1.181 13.0 172 t.O 154 17.0 30
NOTES. 1. FLOH RANGE VALUES IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000. (APPROXIMATE NGD IN PARENTHESES).
2. TOTAL STATE FLOH IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000.
10.t
5 27.8
55
-------
TABLE 24
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SECONDARY
TREATMENT FACILITIES, BY PLANT SIZE
Table 24 summarizes the projected cost, reported as January 1982 dollars,
for the construction of new secondary treatment plants to be built between
1982 and 2000. Table 24 is a direct extension of Table 23.
The summary indicates a total dollar need per State for new secondary
facilities. The State totals are broken down into dollar needs by flow
range. The dollar needs for each individual plant are included in the total
for the flow range shown for that plant's projected design capacity.
56
-------
DECEMBER 31,
TABLE 24
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MEM SECONDARY TREATMENT FACILITIES. BY PLANT SIZE
(THOUSANDS OF 1*82 DOLLARS)
CUBIC METERS PER DAY X lOOOl
(MILLION GALLONS PER DAY)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
. 1ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
t OF
PLANTS
»7
76
46
34
60
15
5
2
0
25
73
20
15
135
47
160
16
60
167
73
24
24
87
64
93
182
12
7
41
11
26
317
83
9
41
48
18
479
47
12
32
830
0
14
83
103
308
60
11
0
Q
1
2
11
0
STATE
NEEDS
66,770
87,207
46,554
6,356
222,951
10,018
31,394
7,836
0
122,641
48,324
90,890
9,030
57,578
23,257
35,268
25,600
117,620
277,020
54,516
11,356
69,523
53,792
28,556
34,694
295,050
8,164
671
5,565
77,392
205,344
15,636
1,333,519
90,538
367
17,127
25,590
7,158
447,368
15,270
48,570
3,671
22,753
382,622
Q
7,677
96,063
93,645
269,275
45,106
1,286
0
n
1,520
2,936
19,366
0
0-.40
(0-.10)
NEEDS
10,955
32,152
2,431
5,671
10,162
1,719
307
384
o
1,049
7,566
830
2,706
38,239
13.244
32,857
1,462
15.120
19.177
18.868
5.476
896
15,467
16,333
10,884
25,890
2,129
671
2.134
12.592
0
3,814
43,768
9,316
367
9,451
6,193
4,158
72,123
1,315
3,714
1,763
5,041
131,748
3,227
10,836
16,180
40,785
10,278
994
0
0
0
0
3.965
0
.401-1.9
(.11-. 50)
NEEDS
23.869
11/036
23.258
665
17,543
504
307
0
g
8/424
11.849
8.691
3,072
16,717
10,013
2, '31
926
15,410
24,960
31,956
5,860
12,437
32,540
12,223
6,519
10,067
432
Q
3,431
34,467
5,659
1,785
92,664
13,495
o
7,676
3,042
3.000
146,046
0
13,867
1,908
9,769
100,887
0
4,450
29,827
42,250
149,940
14,154
292
0
0
1,520
0
5.107
0
1.901-4.0 4.001-1* 1*. 001-40
(.51-1.05) (1.06-5.01) (5.02-10.56)
NEEDS
11.088
0
3.733
A
12.966
3.211
0
0
0
0
10.764
25.056
2.26*
2,622
0
o
0
941
16.676
3.6*2
0
4,967
5.785
Q
798
6.090
0
g
0
10,969
3,429
10.037
40,832
3,309
Q
0
0
0
78,339
0
4,374
4,47?
37,6*6
0
0
5,970
10.662
59.017
1.838
0
0
0
g
2.936
1.659
0
NEEDS
20.577
25,654
17.132
14.873
3,534
11,430
7,452
0
33,637
18,145
56.313
983
0
o
Q
0
0
40,661
0
0
59.414
0
Q
16,493
54,284
5,603
0
0
19,364
11.700
0
108,436
19,355
0
0
2/*22
0
141,671
13,955
7,645
3,063
65,075
0
0
11,153
19,143
19,533
18,836
0
0
0
0
0
6,615
0
NEEDS
0
18/365
0
24.255
0
19.350
0
0
26,390
0
0
0
0
Q
g
23,212
8,402
17,475
0
0
11.809
19.87
0
0
65,400
0
46,766
0
0
0
13,433
0
9,189
0
18,950
0
383
6,668
0
0
10.430
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40.001-190 190.001*
(10.57-50.1*) (50. 2+)
NEEDS
0
0
0
0
143,152
1,050
0
0
0
53,141
0
0
0
0
g
0
0
22,511
61,437
0
0
0
0
0
0
178.840
0
0
II
0
98,954
0
56,077
45,063
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
40,746
0
0
27,847
5,410
0
0
0
NEEDS
261
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
55.236
96,614
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
942,974
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U.S. TOTALS
4,240
5,098,220
666,427
977,245
166,202
56.671
362,356
734,232
1.095,087
57
-------
TABLE 25
NUMBER OF FACILITIES AND REASONS FOR TREATMENT MORE STRINGENT THAN SECONDARY
FACILITIES IN THE YEAR 2000
Table 25 is a summary of the number of treatment facilities required to have
treatment levels more stringent than secondary. This summary includes all
those plants existent in 1982 treating wastes to these levels plus those
required to be constructed or upgraded to this level between 1982 and 2000.
The second column lists by State the total number of treatment plants that
will be operational in 2000. The third column lists the number of plants
that will have to provide treatment more stringent than secondary. The
remaining columns describe the reasons these plants must provide treatment
more stringent than secondary. The headings for these remaining columns are
self-explanatory.
It should be noted that more than one reason is possible for any single
treatment plant being required to provide treatment more stringent than
secondary. Therefore, the total number of all reasons does not equal the
number of more stringent than secondary plants for all States.
58
-------
DECEMBER It, M 82
TAILS 23
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
NUHBER OF FACILITIES AND REASONS FOR TREATMENT MORE STRINGENT THAN SECONDARY
FACILITIES IN THE YEAR 2000
««»»««.*»l.»tEASONS FOR TREATMENT LEVEL BEING MORE STRINGENT THAN SECONDAIY»».ll»»ll
STATE
TOTAL NUMBER
NUMBER OF REQUIRING
TREATMENT MORE STRINGENT
FACILITIES TREATMENT
EPA-APPROVED STATE FEDERAL DISCHARGE STATE OR FEDERAL
HATER QUALITY COURT COURT PERMIT ENFORCEMENT VOLUNTARY STATE
PLAN ORDER ORDER CONDITIONS ORDER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE OTHER
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAHAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEU JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
!8UTH CDiK§TANA
JfSSf"
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
HASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
HVOHING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
170
484
2*1
103
22
1
31*
428
44
205
857
531
813
583
385
444
20*
281
148
48*
377
504
*32
181
4*5
71
142
154
1*0
8*4
*32
2*5
790
584
231
1.241
25
2.11?
178
102
307
337
«23
112
1
3
31
21
5
21.027
1
I
2
3
5
14
t
2
0
10
2»
2
4
2
45
(
0
13
1
0
120
15
25
20
4
0
0
0
3
1
2
0
»
28
0
152
»
75
*5
17
I)
2
1
17
1
51
7
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
4*
0
0
0
0
1
2
*.*2»
123
41
1*2
12
57
0
0
2*2
t
4
7
1
0
127
74
0
2
114
24
7*
5
142
25
12
1
10
15
«
205
20
1
0
1
5
10
«
235
223
0
S3
12
0
»4
2
(3
85
12
1*
13
0
12
»»
S
0
0
2
2
3
0
2.21t
59
-------
TABLE 26
POPULATIONS SERVED BY ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 26 summarizes the 1980 populations served and the 2000 populations
projected to be served by facilities designed to provide advanced secondary
treatment. The treatment levels attained by advanced secondary plants are
defined in terms of the effluent BODr concentration and/or the removal of
the nutrients phosphorus (as PO,) and/or ammonia (NH~). A plant is
considered to be advanced secondary in design if it? is capable of
consistently producing an effluent with a BOD5 concentration in the range of
24 to 10 mg/1 and/or it has specific processes which remove phosphorus
and/or ammonia in excess of the amounts normally removed by secondary
treatment.
The 2000 total State population values reported are from estimates provided
by BEA. The 1980 population values are based on those reported in the April
1981 Report of the Bureau of Census. The Percent Served is a function of
the residents receiving treatment in relation to the total State population
estimated by BEA.
The total population within the service area of an authority is the sum of
persons receiving treatment and not receiving treatment. Those persons not
receiving treatment reside in the service area but do not contribute to the
treatment facility because they are not on a sewer system.
Resident populations are permanent residents in the service area of a
sewerage authority. Nonresident populations include commuters living in one
area and working in another, as well as all transients, tourists, and
seasonal residents.
60
-------
DECEHBEI SI,
TABLE 2«
1*82
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
(POPULATION IN THOUSANDS)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISS-PPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEX'.S
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
EUAN
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTAL
HXW rurwi
1980
TOTAL
3,890
400
2,718
2,266
23.669
2.869
1.106
595
638
9.740
5.464
965
944
11,418
5,490
2,913
2,363
3,661
4.204
1,125
4,216
5,737
9.258
4.077
2,521
4,917
787
1.578
799
921
7.364
1.300
17,577
5,674
653
10,797
3,025
2,633
11,667
947
3,119
690
4,591
14,228
1,461
511
5,346
4.130
1,950
4,705
450
33
110
17
3,197
118
99
230.075
,M 1 AUfl N**N
2000
TOTAL
4,140
694
4,357
2,970
26,786
4.371
3.902
641
694
15.049
7,053
1,366
1.183
12,358
6,059
3,101
2,642
4,224
4.880
1.222
5,583
6,736
10.314
4,505
2,740
5,379
938
1.734
1.408
1.306
9,022
1,781
19,683
7,419
690
12,237
3,702
3,209
12,854
1,084
3,700
730
5,573
21,000
1,963
607
6.755
4.659
2,101
5,553
484
40
275
33
4.700
183
116
278,888
»WI,» Kc
1980
RES.
450
7
12
226
4,186
1.333
116
385
744
1.855
520
28
81
7,982
2,564
139
79
388
143
15
1,542
379
5,622
247
SO
142
10
0
431
1
686
6
1,991
663
0
3,981
306
938
2,587
10
261
36
632
4,945
1.183
430
164
2.172
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
50.853
bfclVlHG T
2000
RES.
1.427
26
2
1.059
5,935
2,110
645
795
0
2.740
3.919
8
255
11.552
4,111
1.133
164
1,363
560
10
3,072
774
7,395
2.435
1.260
357
32
0
703
55
1.607
99
4.163
1,662
0
8,638
735
2,582
7.416
211
832
293
2,6 = 5
9,7911
1,797
U7
1,538
71
438
3,687
176
0
0
28
105
28
0
102.471
KtAIHENl
1980
NONRES
7
0
0
15
116
109
16
40
1.898
296
15
2
0
32
235
1
0
19
26
o
15
2
77
0
2
12
1
0
71
0
75
12
140
2
0
22
0
16
157
0
87
36
54
7
5
209
44
0
44
o
0
o
g
0
0
o
3.939
2000
NONRES
66
1
I
37
197
426
9
357
0
440
154
4
8
42
469
64
0
52
6
55
27
145
21
6
24
1
0
83
159
21
729
132
0
50
0
58
503
4
104
131
188
308
34
294
35
2
66
Q
0
o
2
0
2
o
5,559
««« NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT ««
1980 2000 1960 2000
RES. RES. NONRES NONRES
103 17 0 0
1000
Q A n n
7
249
3
116
35
o
209
147
0
27
94
167
3
g
62
2
253
147
530
(
7
56
Q
g
g
61
0
447
252
o
253
10
232
461
12
94
0
360
142
224
41
148
0
o
0
0
o
A
0
5.234
5
10
0
139
20
0
64
162
0
7
12
22
0
0
162
o
52
146
227
43
72
0
0
0
0
1 2
70
34
217
353
0
22
Q
0
146
93
38
215
2
0
27
27
22
0
0
0
26
0
0
2.500
0
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
o
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
Q
5
0
Q
0
o
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
o
0
0
I
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
4
0
g
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
«« PERCENT ««» "« TREATMENT Kit
SERVED PLANTS
I960 2000
1980 2000
21
3
3
42
62
15
21
6
1
102
43
6
4
320
160
19
4
52
12
2
51
16
122
23
20
12
1
0
8
1
22
3
103
48
0
294
19
97
248
2
20
5
44
245
I
52
4
17
137
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2.529
116
3
2
315
63
22
25
13
0
160
167
1
9
438
384
104
6
234
35
10
186
29
180
84
272
40
1
0
5
7
53
a
203
225
0
533
29
119
487
6
112
15
181
392
137
32
74
5
62
229
4
0
0
2
5
3
0
5.649
61
-------
TABLE 27
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES IN OPERATION IN 1982
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT
Table 27 summarizes the performance of all treatment facilities designed to
provide advanced secondary treatment. Information is provided for all
States and U.S. Territories with a national total at the bottom of the
table.
This table provides an estimate of the total quantity of various pollutants
accepted by treatment plants within the State and the total quantity of
these same pollutants in the effluent. Quantities are given in metric tons
per day for BOD& and Solids. Information is also provided on nutrient
removal capabilities.
Plants with Removal Capability are facilities with a specific requirement to
remove the listed nutrient. For instance, some phosphorus is removed in all
treatment plants. However, only plants specifically designed to remove
phosphorus are reported in this category. Reported for each nutrient are
the total number of plants with this removal capability and the total
average daily flow received by these plants. Also given is the percentage
of the total State flow the plants represent.
These data were derived from the daily average flow and the daily average
influent and effluent pollutant concentrations. The averages are based on
the actual performances of each individual treatment plant during the most
recent 12 month period for which information could be obtained. The values
calculated for each plant are summed into State and national totals. The
main source of information for flow and concentration values was the
self-monitoring reports submitted by every facility with an NPDES permit.
Table 27 is an extension of Table 26. A summary of the projected year 2000
performance of all advanced secondary facilities is given in Table 28.
Total Flow is the sum of the actual average daily flows treated by all
facilities within the State designed to provide advanced secondary
treatment.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD5 or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
62
-------
DECEMBER 31, 1*82
TABLE 27
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES IN OPERATION IN 1982
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
STATE
ALABAilA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
NOTESl
ACTUAL
FLOW
359
7
4
106
1,903
663
72
275
1,169
964
312
15
70
6.702
2.076
69
42
234
57
12
831
280
4,312
195
34
126
4
0
271
0
1.204
3
1.374
456
0
2,709
120
722
1,417
5
157
16
564
2.793
104
15
633
266
81
1.642
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35.494
1. FLOWS
«*«««« Kcnui
«*lt*MII BODS
INF. EFF.
51
1
1
23
560
140
13
43
174
163
61
3
16
925
339
25
6
40
13
2
141
38
1,186
48
5
31
0
0
54
0
254
0
237
95
0
470
24
122
288
1
40
3
103
667
14
2
106
51
17
407
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,030
IN CUBIC
4
0
0
1
21
11
1
7
2
12
8
0
0
59
29
1
0
3
0
0
38
4
78
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
17
0
31
6
0
59
2
10
32
0
4
51
J
0
6
2
1
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
582
At CffJCJfcNClf
X
REN. INF.
92.2
88.9
78.0
93.7
96.1
91.7
69.8
83.1
98.6
92.3
65.6
93.2
97.3
93.5 1
91.1
9S.2
91.3
91.6
94.2
75.0
72.8
87.0
93.4 2
96.2
91.2
98.1
85.0
0.0
92.6
89.4
92.9
84.7
86.6
91.2
0.0
67.2
90.6
91.1
88.6
81.6
87.9
97.0
73.8
92.3
85.4
94.5
93.6
94.9
69.6
93.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
91.7 6
METERS X 1000
55
1
1
21
593
160
16
49
188
170
6C
2
18
,222
443
27
9
37
11
2
151
54
,217
32
5
25
0
0
59
0
238
1
238
80
0
734
27
136
317
1
29
727
16
2
too
57
17
417
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9C5
2.
"IDS ««« PHOSPHORUS ««» » NH3 NITROGEN «« «... TOTAL N «»»»
* * TOT. * X TOT. « )t TOT.
EFF. REN. PLANTS FLOW FLOW PLANTS FLOW FLOW PLANTS FLOW FLOW
6
0
0
2
25
11
1
14
10
20
9
0
0
65
47
1
0
4
1
0
26
4
113
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
22
0
29
12
0
70
2
10
53
0
4
0
30
89
1
0
8
2
2
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
742
METRIC
68.5
85.3
72.7
87.7
95.7
92.6
93.6
70.8
94.4
87.7
83.6
92.4
96.3
94.6
89.2
94.4
95.1
69.1
83.5
82.6
82.4
91.7
94.6
95.6
85.3
96.9
90.6
0.0
94.6
89.4
90.6
88.7
87.7
83.6
0.0
90.3
90.1
92.5
83.0
84.3
85.2
96.3
73.5
87.7
90.0
94.6
92.0
96.1
86.2
94.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.7
0.0
91.6
TONS X
0
0
0
0
5
5
3
1
1
8
10
0
0
29
55
0
0
0
0
1
5
3
114
16
1
0
0
0
2
0
3
1
24
2
0
45
4
1
82
1
1
0
0
5
0
6
6
1
1
61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
505
.9072
0
0
0
0
315
6
26
1
1.169
120
60
0
0
245
1,123
0
0
0
0
0
666
13
4.299
172
0
0
0
0
242
0
14
2
735
5
0
950
66
51
597
3
4
0
2?
0
4
112
122
4
1.558
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12.745
SHORT
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.5
0.9
36.1
0.5
100.0
12.5
19.3
0.0
0.0
3.6
54.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
62.5
4.9
99.6
88.6
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
69.0
0.0
1.1
67.0
53.5
1.2
0.0
35.0
54.8
7.1
42.1
62.1
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
28.0
17.7
42.2
5.9
94.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.9
TONS
15
0
0
0
8
6
1
1
1
6
21
0
0
40
15
IS
0
42
0
0
3
3
14
1
9
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
8
IB
0
68
5
1
117
0
IS
32
43
0
0
2
1
4
41
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
561
326
0
0
0
623
29
0
3
1.169
132
166
0
0
4,895
1.057
60
0
182
0
0
4
59
384
13
25
96
0
0
90
0
10
0
74
163
0
399
70
30
480
0
144
10
522
124
0
0
115
1
13
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11,636
90.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
32.7
4.4
0.9
1.3
100.0
13.7
53.4
0.0
0.0
73.0
50.8
66.5
0.0
77.6
0.0
0.0
0.5
21.3
8.9
6.7
73.4
74.7
0.0
0.0
33.4
0.0
0.8
0.0
5.3
40.1
0.0
14.7
57.9
4.2
33.8
0.0
91.5
61.5
92.7
4.4
0 .0
0.0
18.2
0.4
17.0
7.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
32.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 0
o'.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3. SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS
4. FACILITIES WITH ZERO DISCHARGE OR RAW DISCHARGE ARE NOT INCLUDED
63
-------
TABLE 28
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES TO BE IN OPERATION IN 2000
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT
Table 28 summarizes the expected performance in the year 2000 of all
treatment facilities designed to provide advanced secondary treatment.
Information is provided for all States and U.S. Territories with a national
total at the bottom of the table.
This table provides an estimate of the total quantity of various pollutants
that will be received by treatment plants within the State and the total
quantity of these same pollutants that will be in the effluent. Quantities
are given in metric tons per day for BOD,- and Solids. Information is also
provided on nutrient removal capabilities.
Plants with Removal Capability are facilities with a specific requirement to
remove the listed nutrient. For instance, some phosphorus is removed in all
treatment plants. However, only plants specifically designed to remove
phosphorus are reported in this category. Reported for each nutrient are
the total number of plants with this removal capability and the total
average daily flow received by these plants. Also given is the percentage
of the total State flow the plants represent.
These data were derived from the daily average flow and the daily average
influent and effluent pollutant concentrations. The averages are based on
the predicted year 2000 situation. The values calculated for each plant are
summed into State and national totals.
Table 28 is an extension of Tables 26 and 27.
Total Flow is the sum of the average daily flows to be treated in the year
2000 by all facilities within the State that will be designed to provide
advanced secondary treatment.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD5 or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
64
-------
DECEMBER SI.
TABLE 28
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES TO BE IN OPERATION IN 2000
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
PROJECTED
STATE FLOW
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOMA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEM JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
NASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
NOTES I
1,047
15
2
499
2.831
1,05*
970
568
0
1,516
2,37}
11
160
12,081
1,558
681
101
79»
255
9
1,7*1
610
6,572
1.645
711
195
10
0
512
44
691
51
5,661
1,404
0
5.905
348
1,517
5,217
175
513
166
2,099
5,215
1,242
131
925
76
241
3.126
96
0
0
19
38
8
0
73.073
1. FLOWS
X
INF. EFF. DEM.
209 16 92.2
2 0 88.8
0 0 93.8
120 5 95.5
840 41 95.0
2*4 22 90.2
77 6 91.6
132 8 93.4
0 0 0.0
313 30 90.3
496 36 92.5
2 0 92.0
33 3 89.5
1.931 135 92.
706 47 93.
148 10 92.
23 1 95.
163 12 92.
57 3 93.
3 0 93.
388 44 88.
122 9 91.
1,248 159 87.
457 22 95.
148 9 93.
55 2 96.
1 G 87.
0 0 0.0
68 5 92.2
9 0 92.2
206 16 92.2
10 0 91.1
751 77 89.7
377 20 94.4
0 0 0.0
1,212 90 92.5
77 4 93.7
364 23 93.5
1,110 97 91.2
46 2 94.5
153 9 94.0
52 2 94.2
578 37 93.4
1,325 52 96.0
244 14 93.8
28 2 90.2
218 17 92.1
10 0 91.4
«9 3 95. 5
740 82 88.9
20 2 85.8
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
2 0 85.1
9 0 91.9
1 0 85.5
0 0 0.0
15,611 1,198 92.3
IN CUBIC METERS X
HHKHHW auk* U9 r**rr*rm m*m rnwarnwn V9 »« KK nn * nil nuocn "« nwftit IUIAI n ma mm*
X » X TOT. 1 X TOT. t X TOT.
INF. EFF. REN. PLANTS FLOW FLOW PLANTS FLOW FLOW PLANTS FLOW FLOW
210
2
0
110
888
253
73
130
0
319
481
2
34
2,756
806
153
18
172
S3
3
348
133
1,784
505
144
40
1
0
6B
1C
201
13
809
320
0
1,343
84
348
1,269
44
105
49
468
1,322
278
25
203
11
«6
783
21
0
0
2
8
1
0
17.297
1000 2.
30 85. t 0 0 0.0 101 921 87.9 0 0.0
0 87.2 0 0 0.0 00 0.0 0 0.0
0 91. 1 0 1.5 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
7 93. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
38 95. 4 273 9.6 10 943 33.3 0 0.0
22 90. 5 36 3.4 14 330 31.1 0 0.0
5 92. 12 296 79.8 10 254 68.5 0 0.0
11 91. 3 «0 10.7 2 15 2.« 0 0.0
00. 0 0 0.0 00 0.0 0 0.0
33 89. 7 239 15.7 89 611 40.3 0 0.0
62 87. 23 402 16.9 130 1.996 84.1 0 0.0
0 92. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
4 at. 4 33 21.0 3 28 17.5 0 0.0
191 93. 47 596 4.9 105 9,664 79.9 0 0.0
47 94. 85 1,903 53.4 60 2,309 64.9 0 0.0
15 89. 0 0.0 97 <28 91.8 0 0.0
1 93. 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
19 88. 1 0.0 229 724 90.6 0 0.0
5 90. 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
0 93. 8 96.1 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
43 87. 18 1,439 82.5 12 127 7.3 0 0.0
9 92. 16 372 61.0 10 148 24.3 0 0.0
170 90. 173 6,557 99.7 30 848 12.9 0 0.0
47 90. 48 329 20.0 10 1,323 80.4 0 0.0
19 86. 2 1 0.1 200 560 78.7 0 0.0
2 93. 0 0 0.0 1 113 58.0 0 0.0
0 89. 0 0 0.0 1 10 100.0 0 0.0
00. 0 0 0.0 00 0.0 0 0.0
2 96. 2 492 96.0 1 151 29.5 0 0.0
0 93. 3 34 76.2 5 42 96.1 0 0.0
17 91. 12 132 14.8 28 458 51.4 0 0.0
1 89. 3 11 22.1 1 0 1.1 0 0.0
84 89. 56 2,763 75.4 47 512 13.9 0 0.0
40 87. 7 47 3.3 141 1,098 78.2 0 0.0
00. 00 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
101 92. 135 4.198 71.0 288 3,860 65.3 0 0.0
8 90. 4 134 38.6 13 241 69.4 0 0.0
23 93. 1 56 3.7 1 36 2.4 0 0.0
125 90. 207 1,373 26.3 343 1,682 32.2 0 0.0
3 92. 2 6 3.4 3 164 93.8 0 0.0
11 86. 15 151 29.5 67 434 84.5 0 0.0
3 93. 0 0 0.0 11 156 93.6 0 0 0.0
49 89. 11 2 0.1 167 2,075 98.8 0 0 0.0
78 94. 7 43 0.8 49 974 18.6 0 0 0.0
1? 95. 0 0 0.0 2 19 1.5 0 0 0.0
2 89. 24 97 74.4 13 50 38.7 0 0 0.0
17 91. 9 35 3.8 2 20 2.2 0 0 0.0
1 89. 0 0.0 2 16 21.1 0 0 0.0
3 95. 2 3.5 23 128 53.0 0 0 0.0
79 89. 75 2,64 84.6 101 619 19.8 0 0 0.0
2 87. 0 0.0 4 96 100.0 0 0 0.0
00. 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
00. 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 85. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 90. 1 16 41.9 3 18 47.2 0 0 0.0
0 85. 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
1,465 91.5 1,033 24,805 33.9 2,429 34,422 47.1 0 0 0.0
METRIC TONS X .9072 SHORT TONS
3. SUM OF ENTRIES HAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS
4. FACILITIES WITH ZERO DISCHARGE OR RAH DISCHARGE ARE NOT INCLUDED
65
-------
TABLE 29
NUMBER OF PLANTS PROJECTED FOR ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT BY YEAR 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
Table 29 is a flow summary for all advanced secondary treatment plants
projected to be in operation by the year 2000. The treatment levels
attained by advanced secondary plants are defined in terms of the effluent
BODc concentration and/or the removal of the nutrients phosphorus (as PO.)
and/or ammonia (NH-). A plant is considered to be advanced secondary in
design if it is capable of consistently producing an effluent with a BODC
concentration in the range of 24 to 10 mg/1 and/or it has specific processes
which remove phosphorus and/or ammonia in excess of the amounts normally
removed by secondary treatment. A summary is provided for each State and
U.S. Territory. National totals are summarized at the bottom of the table.
In the second column the total number of projected advanced secondary
treatment plants in each State is reported. Column three represents the
total wastewater treatment capacity of the plants in thousand cubic meters
per day. The projected design flow for each plant was used to calculate the
total treatment capacity value.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the State totals into seven flow
ranges. The ranges specified in the column headings are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses beneath the headings, in
million gallons per day. Reported for each flow range are the number of
plants in the range and the percentage of the total State advanced secondary
treatment capacity that is accounted for by each flow range.
Included in this summary are advanced secondary plants in operation in 1982
which will not be abandoned or upgraded between 1982 and 2000; primary,
advanced primary, and secondary plants which will be upgraded to advanced
secondary levels before 2000; and new advanced secondary plants which will
be constructed prior to 2000.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the n
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. Thi
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
number of
This occurs
is less
66
-------
DECEMBER SI,
TABLE 2*
1*82
1182 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF PLANTS PROJECTED FOR ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT BY YEAR 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
TOTAL
TOTAL DESIGN
PLANTS FLOW
IK 1.0*7
3 15
2 2
315 499
43 2,811
22 1.059
2S 570
13 5*8
0 0
ltd 1,516
167 2,373
1 11
9 UO
438 12,081
384 3.558
104 (84
6 101
234 799
35 255
10 *
188 1,743
2* MO
180 (.572
84 1.645
272 711
40 195
1 10
0 0
5 512
7 44
53 891
8 51
203 3. (61
225 1.404
0 0
533 5,905
29 348
119 1,517
487 5.217
« 175
112 513
15 U6
181 2,099
392 5.215
137 1.242
32 131
74 925
5 78
82 241
229 3.126
4 96
0 0
0 0
2 19
5 38
3 8
0 0
0-.4
CO-. 101
X
PLANTS FLOH
29 .7
0 .0
1 .5
194 .9
0 .0
3 .0
0 .0
1 .0
0 .0
16 .2
26 .2
0 .0
1 .1
54 .1
140 .8
14 .4
0 .0
93 .7
7 .6
6 .1
112 .0
1 .0
6 .0
19 .2
174 .0
17 .2
0 .0
0 .0
0 .0
1 .6
1 .0
0 .0
SO .2
129 0.9
0 0.0
199 0.6
4 0.2
14 0.2
105 0.4
1 0.1
52 2.0
2 0.2
42 0.4
«9 0.3
74 1.1
4 0.5
18 0.3
0 0.0
32 3.0
57 0.4
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 8.0
.401-1.9
(.11-. 50
X
PLANTS FLOI
31 2.1
1 7.
0 0.
76 12.
9 0.
2 0.
5 1.
1 0.
0 0.
69 4.
54 1.
0 0.
1 0.
148 1.
141 3.
40 6.
1 0.
73 7.
6 2.
2 13.
40 2.
t 1.
40 0.
36 Z.I
65 7.
14 t.
0 0.
0 0.
1 0.
3 7.
7 1.
4 4.
55 1.
33 1.
0 0.
lit 2.<
6 2.
47 3.
176 3.
0 0.
29 6.'
3 1.
58 2.
147 2.1
31 2..
13 9.
26 2..
2 3..
28 12.
76 2.<
1 D.<
0 0.1
0 O.I
C O.I
0 O.I
2 30.1
0 O.I
1.901-4 4.001-19 19.001-40 40.001-190 190.001+
(.51-1.05) (1.06-5.01) (5.02-10.56) (10.57-50.19) (50.2+)
X X X X X
1 PLANTS FLON PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLON PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
1 12 3.0 35 29.5 5 13.7 3 28.2 1 21.6
! 0 0.0 2 92.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
1 98.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
14 7.8 26 42.2 4 21.5 1 9.0 0 0.0
t 0.6 21 7.8 10 9.7 14 41.2 3 40.2
1 0.2 12 10.7 1 2.0 2 20.5 1 66.0
4 2.8 9 21.2 4 29.9 3 44.2 0 0.0
6 3.2 2 4.1 0 0.0 2 24.6 1 67.6
0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
25 4.5 33 19.2 7 12.5 10 58.8 0 0.0
21 2.4 39 15.2 14 16.5 12 47.5 1 15.9
0 0.0 1 99.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
2 3.5 2 6.2 1 14.1 2 75.2 0 0.0
69 1.6 113 8.3 23 5.6 26 15.9 5 66.9
26 2.0 53 14.1 4 3.0 It 37.4 4 38.8
19 7.7 24 28.1 4 15.3 3 41.8 0 0.0
1 3.7 3 21.3 0 0.0 1 74.3 0 0.0
23 7.5 42 53.6 1 2.8 2 25.2 0 0.0
4 4.6 13 47.6 5 44. » 0 0.0 0 0.0
1 20.3 1 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
12 1.9 11 6.4 6 10.1 5 15.8 2 62.1
4 1.9 11 16.5 3 13.4 3 32.0 1 34.7
r 41 1.7 64 8.3 10 4.2 14 21.4 5 63.3
) 11 1.7 12 5.6 2 3.4 3 20.1 1 66.7
r 12 4.6 15 21.8 4 18.1 1 7.3 1 36.1
r 2 2.8 5 18.4 1 11.6 1 58.0 0 0.0
) 0.0 1 99.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
! 0.0 2 3.6 0 0.0 1 29.5 1 66.5
! 5.2 1 18.2 1 68.2 0 0.0 0 0.0
! 2.7 29 33.8 4 13.0 3 17.2 1 31.8
1 5.1 2 30.7 1 59.3 0 0.0 0 0.0
r 25 1.9 44 10.9 13 10.4 12 26.0 4 48.7
» 16 3.3 24 19.0 13 26.5 10 48.1 0 0.0
) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
\ 39 1.7 72 11.7 27 12.0 24 30.8 6 40.5
! 3 2.4 10 32.5 3 19.5 3 42.9 0 0.0
) 15 2.8 29 19.2 8 16.2 5 33.0 1 24. »
5 68 3.6 104 18.3 22 10.9 8 13.4 4 49.5
) 0 0.0 2 5.9 1 20.9 2 72.9 0 0.0
t 8 4.7 14 23.8 8 43.1 I 19.8 0 0.0
2 4.5 t 28.7 0 0.0 2 64.6 0 0.0
I 26 3.3 40 17.4 6 7.5 7 25.2 2 45. 2
72 3.8 69 11.8 15 7.3 13 18.7 7 55.0
7 1.5 IS 11.1 4 9.5 5 47.5 1 26.8
> 4 8.9 10 66.5 1 14.6 0 0.0 0 0.0
) 7 2.4 13 13.1 4 12.1 !/ 40.6 1 28.6
! 0 0.0 1 19.7 2 76.9 0 0.0 0 0.0
8 9.9 12 37.3 0 0.0 2 37.4 0 0.0
> 43 4.0 33 10.4 t 4.4 11 28.8 3 49.3
t 0 0.0 2 2B.7 0 0.0 1 70.8 0 0.0
1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
I 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
) 0 0.0 2 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
1 9.8 4 90.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
1 0 0.0 1 69.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEN JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEN YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TEX"?!""
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
HASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
NYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 5.849 73.073 1.768 0.4 1,775 2.3 671 2.5 1,091 13.8 248
NOTES: 1. FIOH RANGE VALUES IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000. (APPROXIMATE MSD IN PARENTHESES).
2. TOTAL STATE FLOH IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000.
239 26.5
67
-------
TABLE 30
NUMBER OF NEW ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT PLANTS
TO BE BUILT BETWEEN 1982 AND 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
Table 30 is a flow summary for all new advanced secondary treatment plants
which will be constructed between 1982 and 2000. The treatment levels
attained by advanced secondary plants are defined in terms of the effluent
with a BOD. concentration and/or the removal of the nutrients phosphorus (as
P04) and/or ammonia (NH~). A plant is considered to be advanced secondary
in design if it is capable of consistently producing an effluent with a BODC
concentration in the range of 24 to 10 mg/1 and/or it has specific processel
which remove phosphorus and/or ammonia in excess of the amounts normally
removed by secondary treatment. A summary is provided for each State and
U.S. Territory. National totals are summarized at the bottom of the table.
In the second column the total number of new advanced secondary treatment
plants to be constructed in each State is reported. Column three represents
the total wastewater treatment capacity of the plants in thousand cubic
meters per day. The projected design flow for each plant was used to
calculate the total treatment capacity value.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the State totals into seven flow
ranges. The ranges specified in the column headings are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses beneath the headings, in
million gallons per day. Reported for each flow range are the number of
plants in the range and the percentage of the State advanced secondary
treatment capacity that is accounted for by each flow range.
Included in this summary are entirely new advanced secondary plants which
are planned to be constructed by the year 2000. Excluded are advanced
secondary plants that were operational in 1982 and primary, advanced
primary, and secondary plants planned to be upgraded to advanced secondary
treatment by the year 2000.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the number of
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. This occurs
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value is less
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
68
-------
DECEMBER SI 1*82
TABLE SO
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF NEH ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATMENT PLANTS TO BE BUILT BETWEEN 1912 AND 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARI20NA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAHARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAHAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TOTAL
PLANTS
S7
0
0
169
2
1
1
0
0
89
54
0
2
28
1S6
2
2
99
10
7
113
6
15
1
180
14
0
0
0
S
11
0
81
57
0
135
1
14
147
0
64
0
48
104
91
4
16
0
52
9
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
TOTAL
DESIGN
FLOH
60
0
0
64
87
0
9
0
0
169
165
0
6
113
67
7
17
66
28
S
47
111
274
1
105
6
0
0
0
10
99
0
252
236
0
194
20
31
188
0
65
0
46
690
43
8
164
0
56
22
0
0
0
9
0
2
0
0-.
(0-.
PLANTS
22
0
0
154
0
1
0
0
0
16
18
0
0
16
106
1
0
66
5
5
95
1
5
0
155
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
32
0
92
C
8
56
0
48
2°7
51
70
2
4
0
SO
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
10)
X
FLOW
9.S
0.0
0.0
37.7
0.0
99.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
2.7
0.0
0.0
2.9
SO. 5
1.6
0.0
21.5
3.9
18.2
33.1
0.1
0.4
0.0
22.4
28.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.2
2.6
0.0
10.8
0.0
5.4
7.2
0.0
14.4
13.'°
1.7
32.0
5.3
0.5
0.0
11.8
4.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.401-1.9 1.901-4 4.001-19 19.001-40 40.001-190
(.11-. 50) (.51-1.05) (1.06-5.01) (5.02-10.56) (10.57-50.19)
X X X X X
PLANTS
10
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
54
22
0
1
8
24
0
0
26
2
1
14
2
6
1
19
4
0
0
0
2
2
0
25
15
0
34
0
5
65
0
12
0
lo
41
18
0
6
0
14
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
FLOH
12.7
0.0
0.0
11.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
SO.)
8.1
0.0
17.1
5.9
26.0
0.0
0.0
27.1
3.2
22.9
21.3
2.0
1.9
99.9
11.1
17.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.5
2.4
0.0
10.1
4.7
0.0
11.1
0.0
14.5
13.6
0.0
17.9
0.0
23.9
5.0
SO. 5
0.0
2.8
0.0
24.2
11.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.9
0.0
PLANTS
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
3
0
0
2
S
0
0
5
1
1
5
0
1
0
S
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
6
2
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
3
6
2
1
1
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
6.8 3 70.9
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 2 15.1
4.3 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 1 99.9
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
20.2 5 20.0
3.8 9 48.3
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 1 82.8
6.1 1 5.4
11.0 3 32.4
0.0 1 98.3
0.0 2 100.0
20.1 2 31.1
8.3 1 15.3
58.7 0 0.0
16.2 1 27.2
0.0 2 10.5
0.8 2 5.7
0.0 0 0.0
6.9 2 10.0
S3. 5 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0.0
0.0
6.9
0.0
6.4
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.4
0.0
5.8
2^4
10. S
27.3
1.3
0.0
27.1
17.0
0.0
0.0
80.4
60.2
0.0
11.1
12.0
0.0
25.2
0.0
0.0
30.9
0.0
26.7
0.0
42.5
27.0
67.2
13.5
0.0
36.7
66.3
0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 1 99.9
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
4
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
S5.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
69.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
so.s
0.0
8.9
45.9
0.0
31.0
100.0
79.9
10.6
0.0
34.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
190.001*
(50.2+)
X
FLOH PLANTS
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
95.6
.0
.0
.0
.0
2 .7
.0
.0
.0
7 .4
.0
.0
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
87.2
0.0
0.0
49.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
32.0
0.0
21.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.1
0.0
0.0
68.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
91.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
73.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
HEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 1,808 3,562 1,144 6.2 465 10.8 83 6.2 86 19.5 17 12.2
NOTES. 1. FLOH RANGE VALUES IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000. (APPROXIMATE MGD IN PARENTHESES).
2. TOTAL STATE FLOH IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000.
2 21.2
69
-------
TABLE 31
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ADVANCED
SECONDARY FACILITIES, BY PLANT SIZE
Table 31 summarizes the projected costs, reported in January 1982 dollars
for the construction of new advanced secondary treatment plants to be built
between 1982 and 2000. Table 31 is a direct extension of Table 30.
The summary indicates a total dollar need per State for new advanced
secondary facilities. The State totals are broken down into dollar needs by
flow range. The dollar needs of an individual plant are included in the
total for the flow range shown which encompasses its projected design
capacity.
70
-------
DECEMBER 11, 1,82
TABLE 51
1,82 NEEDS SURVEY
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HEM ADVANCED SECONDARY TREATNENT FACILITIES, BY PLANT SIZE
(THOUSANDS OF 1,82 DOLLARS!
TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW
CUBIC METERS PER DAY X lOOOl
(MILLION GALLONS PER DAY)
0-.40
(0-.10)
.401-1.*
(.11-.SO)
1.,01-4.0
(.51-1.05)
4.001-1*
(1.04-5.01)
11.001-40
(5.02-10.Si)
40.001-1*0 1*0.001+
(10.57-50.19) (50.2*)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MABYKND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
MEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTS DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
t OF
PLANTS
17
0
0
14*
2
1
1
0
0
89
54
0
2
28
134
2
2
**
10
7
115
4
15
1
180
14
0
0
0
1
11
0
81
57
0
155
1
14
147
0
64
0
48
104
91
4
It
0
52
»
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
STATE
NEEDS
14.444
0
0
51,113
41,712
324
11,410
0
0
179,155
*4,220
0
8,751
28.14*
101,264
*2
7,487
80,982
18,982
7,923
54,158
26,551
183,019
2.499
98,874
9,422
0
0
0
1,365
84,497
0
158,096
81,98*
0
166,073
10,550
21,332
233,975
0
34,484
Q
44,991
289,791
44,082
11,269
93,23*
0
55,82*
15,084
0
0
0
7,381
0
3,836
0
NEEDS
11,696
0
0
32,953
0
324
0
0
0
9,316
8,373
0
0
5,574
49,223
92
0
40,322
»*7
2,065
27,983
540
2,353
0
58,221
2,934
0
0
0
0
0
0
IS, 053
11,722
0
48,771
0
3,833
32,147
0
15,691
0
13,541
22.233
20,4**
1,157
*04
0
14,020
1,057
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NEEDS
9,531
0
0
4.J19
0
0
0
0
0
69,775
19,096
0
1,787
9,036
31,005
0
0
28,100
1,002
801
13,127
4,672
5,7**
2,4*9
17,432
2,324
0
0
0
1,545
2,441
0
34,034
14,923
0
32,174
0
5,382
95,496
0
11,715
14,927
41,831
11,858
0
5,020
0
20,00*
3,959
0
0
0
0
0
3,836
0
NEEDS
2.434
0
0
0
4,842
0
0
0
0
33,310
3,145
0
0
4,*36
9,574
0
0
7,817
2,51*
5,055
4,968
0
2,750
0
2,743
4,142
0
0
0
0
1,4*0
0
15,3*4
2,223
0
0
0
0
43,558
0
1.54,
iMK
.114
.,74
.1*1
0
,388
,24*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NEEDS
12,785
0
0
1,280
0
0
11,410
0
0
24,4*3
44,804
0
4,944
3.11*
11.440
0
7,487
4,543
1,77*
0
8,040
0
14,587
0
4,870
0
0
0
0
0
41,414
0
2*, 848
17,252
0
11,557
0
0
47,824
0
3.52*
0
12,484
14,788
1,411
4.118
14,111
0
11.412
5,799
0
0
0
7,181
0
0
0
NEEDS
0
0
0
10,541
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,782
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10.485
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,932
0
18.445
35,84*
0
39,534
10,550
12,117
14, ,48
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
17,04,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NEEDS
0
0
0
0
54,850
0
0
0
0
40,241
0
0
0
1.482
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21.11*
0
0
15,410
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45,120
0
0
13,537
0
0
0
0
25,457
u
0
$1,740
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NEEDS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
157, 510
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
174,181
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U.S. TOTALS
1,808
2,424,403
451,420
524,379
1,1.410
434.033
275,174
131,,13
71
-------
TABLE 32
POPULATIONS SERVED BY TERTIARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 32 summarizes the 1980 populations served and the 2000 populations
projected to be served by facilities designed to provide tertiary (advanced
wastewater) treatment. The treatment levels attained by tertiary plants are
defined in terms of the effluent BOD, concentration and/or the removal of
nitrogen. A plant is considered to b°e tertiary in design if it is capable
of consistently producing an effluent with a BOD, concentration less than 10
mg/1 and/or it has specific processes which can Remove more than 50 percent
of the total nitrogen present in the plant influent.
The 2000 total population values reported are from estimates provided by
?I5i* D ,2 population value are based on those reported in the April
1981 Report of the Bureau of Census. The Percent Served is a function of
the residents receiving treatment in relation to the total State population
estimated by BEA. K
The total population within the service area of an authority is the sum of
persons receiving treatment and not receiving treatment. Those persons not
receiving treatment reside in the service area but do not contribute to the
treatment facility because they are not on a sewer system.
Resident populations are permanent residents in the service area of a
sewerage authority. Nonresident populations include commuters living in one
area and working in another, as well as all transients, tourists, and
seasonal residents.
72
-------
DECEMBER 11. 1»B2
TABLE 32
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY TERTIARY TREATMENT
PRESENT AND PROJECTED. RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
(POPULATION IN THOUSANDS)
«» POPULATION »»» »»»" RECEIVING TREATMENT «««« » NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT «« «
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
HASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO PICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTAL
1*80
TOTAL
3.8*0
400
2.718
2,286
23,669
2,88*
3.108
5*5
(38
»,740
5.4(4
9(5
*44
11,418
5,4*0
.913
,3(3
.((1
.204
,125
,216
,737
,258
4,077
2.521
4.917
787
1,570
7*9
921
7.3(4
1,300
17,577
5,874
(53
10,797
3,025
2, (33
11,8(7
947
3.119
690
4,591
14,228
1,461
511
5,346
4.130
1,950
4.705
450
33
110
17
3.1*7
118
»»
230.075
2000
TOTAL
4
4
2
26
4
3
15
7
1
1C
4
2
5
1
1
1
9
1
1*
7
12
3
3
12
1
3
5
(
4
2
5
4
278
.140
694
.357
,970
.786
.371
,902
841
(94
,049
,053
,366
.183
.358
,059
,101
,(42
.224
,880
.222
,583
.736
,314
,505
,740
.379
938
.734
,408
,306
,022
,781
,(83
,41*
690
,237
,702
,20*
,854
.084
,700
730
,573
,000
,963
607
,755
,85*
,101
,553
484
40
275
11
.700
183
IK
.888
1*80
RES.
0
0
0
4
1.178
2
31
3
0
717
31
0
7
13
24
0
0
1
82
0
246
7*
441
5*
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000 1*80 2000 1*80
RES. NONRES NONRES RES.
92 0 3
000
24 0 0
171 0 (
2.444 92 117 7
4 (10
102 0 0
(00
913 0 2.223
1,8(4 (* 182 3
(313
000
** 0 8
24 0 0
54 0 0
000
2000 1*80 2000
RES. NONRES NONRES
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
35 0
0 0
0 0
21 0
0 1
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
o no
000 0000
500 0000
181 00 0000
26 0 0 0700
636 28 87 26 0 00
527 0 2 221 173 0 0
82* 30 40 31 15 00
208 50 0000
44 0 10 0200
100 0000
000 0000
000 0000
100 0000
52 2 5 0 38 0 D
18( 1.243 7 *4 S2 §1 on
0
20*
346
0
418
0
74
247
0
0
0
16
243
0
«!
0
88
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,411
000 0000
826 15 218 74 71 00
1.494 8 40 1(3 217 0 0
000 0000
2.019 20 44 115 11 0 0
301 0 0 0000
142 0 ( I
Q Q A
555 (24 41 19 00
000 0000
52 0 122 00 00
23 0 0 0000
19« 00 12 16 00
4(3 * 10 4000
000 0000
37 0 5 0100
1.997 0 25 19 7 0 0
40* 13 0 30 0
158 0 1 "
20 0
A A .
I w U
M
«, V ll u O
0 0 0 n n
0 0
ODD f
«. w
0 0
U U 1. u g
000 00 A
000 00 0
000 0000
18,328 306 3,306 8*0 727 1 1
PERCENT **» » TREATMENT »
SERVED PLANTS
1*80 2000
1980 2000
0
0
0
5
15
1
2
1
0
14
1
0
1
2
2
0
0
1
3
0
6
4
10
12
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
0
32
28
0
34
0
1
17
0
0
0
4
16
0
0
5
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
231
2
1
1
28
3
0
5
2
3
0
0
3
5
4
11
13
17
39
4
1
0
0
1
4
21
0
102
134
0
99
2
3
32
0
7
1
10
21
0
A
3
11
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(70
73
-------
TABLE 33
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES IN OPERATION IN 1982
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE TERTIARY TREATMENT
Table 33 summarizes the performance of all treatment facilities designed to
provide tertiary treatment. Information is provided for all States and U S
Territories with a national total shown at the bottom of the table.
This table provides an estimate of the total quantity of various pollutants
accepted by treatment plants within the State and the total quantity of
these same pollutants in the effluent. Quantities are given in metric tons
per day for BOD,- and Solids. Information is also provided on nutrient
removal capabilities.
Plants with Removal Capability are facilities with a specific requirement to
remove the listed nutrient. For example, some phosphorus is removed in all
treatment plants. However, only plants specifically designed to remove
phosphorus are reported in this category. Reported for each nutrient are
the total number of plants with this removal capability and the total
average flow received by these plants. Also given is the percentage of the
total State flow the plants represent.
These data were derived from the daily average influent and effluent
pollutant concentrations. The averages are based on the actual performance
of each individual treatment plant during the most recent 12 month period
for which information could be obtained. The values calculated for each
plant are summed into the State and national totals. The main source of
information for flow and concentration values was the self-monitoring
reports submitted by every facility with an NPDES permit.
Table 33 is an extension of Table 32. A summary of the projected year 2000
performance of all tertiary facilities is given in Table 34.
Total _ flow is the sum of the actual average daily flows treated by all
facilities within the State designed to provide tertiary treatment. All
flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD,, or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
74
-------
DECEMBER 11.
TABLE JJ
1*82
1*82 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES IN OPERATION IN 1*82
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE TERTIARY TREATMENT
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
«««*«» KtngVAL EFFICIENCIES «*«
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELANARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
NINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEM HAMPSHIRE
NEN JERSEY
NEN MEXICO
NEW YORK
NC4TH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERNONT
VIRGINIA
NASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
NOTES I
ACTUAL
FLOW
0
0
0
2
426
2
11
0
0
334
14
0
4
7
21
0
0
0
35
0
140
51
314
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
77
0
152
238
0
272
0
52
98
0
0
Q
22
"o
0
230
0
3*
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.705
1. FLOHS
X
INF. EFF. REN.
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 96.4
115 3 96.8
0 0 92.3
2 0 90.8
0 0 47.6
0 0 0.0
81 2 96.7
2 0 97.5
0 0 0.0
0 0 97.2
1 0 92.7
2 0 fl.3
0 0 0.0
0 0 O.D
0 0 98.0
7 0 95.1
0 0 0.0
27 1 96.1
8 0 94.3
59 3 94.1
8 0 97.6
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 98.7
13 1 92.4
0 0 0.0
21 4 80.8
63 5 91.6
0 0 0.0
52 2 94.9
0 0 0.0
10 0 98.4
19 1 92.5
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
3 0 94.5
22 0 97.7
0 0 0.0
0 0 0.0
4* 3 92.6
0 0 94.9
8 1 86.1
0 0 97.5
0 00.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0 0.0
586 32 94.3
INF. EFF.
0
0
0
0
134
0
2
0
0
84
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
7
0
27
*
64
f
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
18
59
0
55
0
13
15
0
0
0
2
21
0
0
53
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
610 3
MMMMM MMM PHOSPHORUS *Mn MM NH3 NITROGEN MM MMMM TOTAL N KM Him
X * X TOT. « X TOT. t X TOT.
REH. PLANTS FLOM FLOW PLANTS FIOM FLON PLANTS FLOW FLOM
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0 .0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0 .0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0 .
0 92.1 0 0 0.0 000. 0 .
3 97.1 5 175 41.2 4 162 38. 235 5 .
0 95.4 1 2 100.0 1 2 100. 2 10 .
0 88.6 1 4 42.3 000. 0 .
0 68. S 0 0 0.0 000. 0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0
3 96.1 11 303 90.5 6 25 7. 233 6 .
0 85.0 0 0 0.0 1 14 100. 0
0 0.0 0 0 O.D 000. 0 .
0 96.6 0 0 0.0 1 4 100. 0
0 90.4 1 6 87.1 2 7 100. 0 1 .
0 95.2 0 0 0.0 000. 0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0 .
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0 .
0 98.0 0 0 0.0 10 100. 0
0 91.6 0 0 0.0 1 5 15. 5 15.
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 00.
1 96.2 3 77 55.3 2 64 45. 123 87.
0 94.4 4 51 100.0 4 51 100. 24 46.7
2 96.4 8 308 »8.1 4 176 56. 15 4.8
0 95.6 3 1* 53.2 2 14 37. 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 00 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 00 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 000. 00 0.0
0 99.1 1 0 100.0 1 0 100. 0 0 0.0
1 91.6 2 29 37.9 4 63 82.7 1 28 37.4
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
2 85.1 5 29 19.6 13 50 33.1 8 111 73.0
I 88.7 0 0 0.0 24 206 86.5 1 0 0.3
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
2 95.7 13 147 54.0 22 253 91.2 0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 00.
0 98.3 1 52 100.0 0 0 0.0 0 00.
1 92.3 5 29 29.8 ID 60 62.0 S 31 32.
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 00.
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 00.
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 00.
0 57.3 0 0 0.0 4 22 100.0 0 0 0.0
1 95.0 11 46 41.2 11 88 78.5 0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 00. 00 0.0
2 95.9 5 230 100.0 116 50. 3 50 21.8
0 94.9 0 0 0.0 0 100. 1 0 100.0
1 86.0 1 2 6.1 5 14. 4 28 73.3
0 99.1 0 0 0.0 3 100. 0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 00. 00 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 00. 00 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 00. 00 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 00. 00 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 00. 00 0.0
C 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
2 94.6 81 1.517 56.0 125 1,402 51.8 47 8*2 32.*
IN CUBIC METERS X 1000 2. METRIC TONS X .9072 SHORT TONS
3. SUN OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS
4. FACILITIES NITH ZERO DISCHARGE OR RAN DISCHARGE ARE NOT INCLUDED
75
-------
TABLE 34
PLANT LOADINGS, REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES TO BE IN OPERATION IN 2000
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE TERTIARY TREATMENT
Table 34 summarizes the expected performance in the year 2000 of all
treatment facilities designed to provide tertiary treatment. Information is
provided for all States and U.S. Territories with a national total shown at
the bottom of the table.
This table provides an estimate of the total quantity of various pollutants
that will be received by treatment plants within the State and the total
quantity of these same pollutants that will be in the effluent. Quantities
are given in metric tons per day for BOD5 and Solids. Information is also
provided on nutrient removal capabilities;
Plants with Removal Capability are facilities with a specific requirement to
remove the listed nutrient. For example, some phosphorus is removed in all
treatment plants. However, only plants specifically designed to remove
phosphorus are reported in this category. Reported for each nutrient are
the total number of plants with this removal capability and the total
average daily flow received by these plants. Also given is the percentage
of the total State flow the plants represent.
These data were derived from the daily average flow and the daily average
influent and effluent pollutant concentrations. The averages are based on
the predicted year 2000 situation. The values calculated for each plant are
summed into State and national totals.
Total Flow is the sum of the average daily flows to be treated in the year
2000 by all facilities within the State that will be designed to provide
tertiary treatment.
Table 34 is an extension of Tables 32 and 33. All flows are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day.
Some States may show influent and/or effluent values of BOD,- or Solids equal
to zero, but still have a percent removal calculated. This is due to the
influent and/or effluent value being less than 0.5 metric tons per day in
which case the value is rounded to zero.
76
-------
DECEMBER 31. 1*82
TABLE 5*
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PLANTS LOADINGS. REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES AND DISCHARGE RATES
FOR FACILITIES TO BE IN OPERATION IN 2000
FACILITIES DESIGNED TO PROVIDE TERTIARY TREATMENT
(METRIC TONS PER DAY)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NOKTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
PROJECTED
FLOW
69
0
9
101
1.193
5
52
1
. 1.169
967
46
0
119
11
52
0
0
3
78
17
368
340
617
144
35
0
0
0
0
30
611
0
540
924
0
1.514
120
79
241
0
41
10
117
210
0
25
880
237
58
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
INF.
13
0
2
22
292
1
11
0
280
195
10
0
29
2
11
0
0
0
16
3
67
73
127
40
7
0
0
0
0
6
148
0
110
234
0
312
28
15
58
0
8
27
42
0
5
203
47
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
EFF.
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
5
5
0
11
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
REM.
97.3
0.0
96.2
97.6
95.7
98.0
94.2
95.7
97.9
96.9
97.0
0.0
92.6
97.7
97.6
0.0
0.0
96.4
96.0
95.7
95.2
97.1
97.9
98.0
97.0
97.5
0.0
0.0
98.0
97.9
97.3
0.0
94.8
97.4.
0.0
96.2
97.8
97.5
96.0
0.0
97.2
96.6
97.3
97.0
0.0
96.4
98.2
85.0
92.8
97.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
X * X
INF. EFF
13
0
2
19
301
1
10
0
280
198
10
0
27
2
10
0
0
0
16
3
71
78
129
35
7
0
0
0
0
7
162
0
109
200
0
352
36
19
52
0
8
3
25
42
0
5
212
47
12
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
19
0
0
0
8
6
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
5
26
0
12
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
2
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REN. PLANTS
84.9
0.0
95.8
92.3
93.4
98.0
95.7
95.7
97.0
96.4 1
86.3
0.0
91.3
96.8
97.4
FLOW
0
0
9
0
789
5
38
0
1,169
841
0
0
11
9
0
0.0 0 0
0.0 0 0
92.8 0 0
90.7 0 0
95.7 '
17
95.7 4 3S6
96.7 12 338
95.9 16 617
94.5 9 33
87.0 0 0
95.0 0 0
0.0 0 0
0.0 0 0
80.0 0 0
98.1 3 25
97.4 6 85
0.0 0
0
94.8 20 206
86.8 3 0
0.0 0 0
96.3 50 1,304
98.2 0 0
97.9 I
75
91.3 13 94
0.0 0 0
91.4 1
96.6 (
93.3 (
94.6 11
0.0 (
94.9 0
98.8 11
85.0 2
91.2 1
98.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0
0
0
0
763
236
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PLANTS WITH REMOVAL CAPABILITY MM
MMM MM NN3
TOT. t
FLOW PLANTS
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
66.1
100.0
72.8
0.0
100.0
86.9 1
0.0
0.0
9.2
84.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
nllKUktN MM MMMM TOTAL N MMMMM
X TOT. t * TflT.
FLOW FLOW PLANTS
FLOW FLOW
69 100.0 0 0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
800 67.0
5 100.0
0 1.6
0 0.0
1,169 100.0
178 18.4
46 100.0
0 0.0
78 65.2
11 100.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
3 100.0
7 9.8
0 0.0 (
1 a 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
882 73.9
5 100.0
22 43.6
0 0.0
0 0.0
201 20.8
7 15.1
0 0.0
11 9.2
1 15.8
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
1 39.6
7 9.8
n n n
96.6 2 204 55.4 5 357 96.9
99.2 11 331 97.3 2 38 11.4
99.9 13 409 66.3 2 22 3.7
23.5 16 88 61.3 1 2 1.6
0.0 2 29 84.8 0 0 0.0
0.0 O 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
o.o o o o.o i a 100.0
82.9 4 30 100.0 0 0 0.0
13.9 16 575 94.2 5 139 22.8
0.0 0
00.0 0
n n . n
38.2 74 375 69.5 25 300 55.6
0.0 123 872 94.3 1 n n n
0.0 0
0 o.o o o no
86.1 80 685 45.2 2 1 0.1
0.0 2
94.7 0
39.1 24
0.0 0
0.6 5
0.0 1
0.0 11
38.2 1<
0.0 1
0.0 1
86.6 7
99.4 3
7.7 2
0.0 1
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
120 100.0 0 o a. a
0 0.0 0
n n n
197 81.8 17 164 6s!l
00.0 0 nnn
36 88.1 0
10 100.0 I
117 100.0 1
177 84.2 1
0 0.0 I
25 100.0 0
456 51.8 8
237 100.0 3
12 20.4 7
8 100.0 0
0 0.0 0
0 0.0 0
00.0 0
0 0.0 0
0 0.0 0
0 0.0 0
0 0.0 0
0 0.0
0 0.0
22 19.3
2 0.9
0 0.0
0 0.0
259 29.4
237 100.0
41 69.9
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
U.S. TOTALS 11,063 2,478 83 96.6 2,523 129 94.8 200 7,114 64.3 451 7,377 66.6 104 2,734 24.7
NOTESt 1. FLOWS IN CUBIC METERS X 1000 2. METRIC TONS X .9072 SHORT TONS
3. SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUND-OFFS
4. FACILITIES WITH ZERO DISCHARGE UR RAW DISCHARGE ARE NOT INCLUDED
77
-------
TABLE 35
NUMBER OF PLANTS PROJECTED FOR TERTIARY TREATMENT BY YEAR 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
Table 35 is a flow summary for all tertiary treatment plants projected to be
in operation by the year 2000. The treatment levels attained by tertiary
plants are defined in terms of the effluent 600. concentration and/or the
removal of nitrogen. A plant is considered to bl tertiary in design if it
is capable of consistently producing an effluent with a BOD,, concentration
less than 10 mg/1 and/or it has specific processes which cart remove more
than 50 percent of the total nitrogen present in the plant influent. A
summary is provided for each State and U.S. Territory. National totals are
summarized at the bottom of the table.
In the second column the total number of projected tertiary treatment plants
in each State is reported. Column three represents the total wastewater
treatment capacity of these plants in thousand cubic meters per day. The
projected design flow for each plant was used to calculate the total
treatment capacity value.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the State totals into seven flow
ranges. The ranges specified in the column headings are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses beneath the headings, in
million gallons per day. Reported for each flow range are the number of
plants within that range and the percentage of the total State tertiary
treatment capacity that is accounted for by each flow range.
Included in this summary are all tertiary plants in operation in 1982 which
will not be abandoned between 1982 and 2000; primary, advanced primary,
secondary, and advanced secondary plants which will be upgraded to tertiary
levels before 2000; and new tertiary plants which will be constructed prior
to 2000.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the number of
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. This occurs
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value is less
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
78
-------
DECEMBER SI, 1982
TABLE 35
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF PLANTS PROJECTED FOR TERTIARY TREATMENT BY YEAR 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESI6N FLOH)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAMARC
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIU\
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEN MEXICO
NCH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. HARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
TOTAL
PLANTS
3
0
1
29
12
2
4
11
13
17
39
4
1
0
0
1
21
0
102
134
0
99
2
3
32
0
7
1
10
21
0
1
25
3
11
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
DESIGN
FLOH
49
0
9
101
1,193
5
52
1
*947
44
0
119
11
52
0
0
3
73
17
348
340
417
144
35
0
0
0
0
30
411
0
540
924
0
1,514
120
79
241
0
Jo
III
0
25
880
237
58
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0-.
(0-.
PLANTS
0
0
0
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
1
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
74
0
24
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
10)
X
FLOH
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
1.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.401-1.9
(.11-. 50)
X
PLANTS FLOH
1 1.4
0 0.0
0 0.0
11 11.7
2 0.1
0 0.0
2 3.0
1 99.9
0 0.0
2 0.2
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
1 15.8
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
3 99.9
1 0.9
1 2.5
2 0.5
0 0.0
4 0.9
10 8.2
0 0.0
1 99.9
0 0.0
0 0.0
1 99.9
0 0.0
2 0.3
0 0.0
42 7.2
19 2.3
0 0.0
19 1.2
0 0.0
0 0.0
11 4.9
0 0.0
1 3.}
0 0.0
I 1:1
0 0.0
0 0.0
8 0.7
2 0.9
4 4.1
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
PLANTS AND PERCENT
1.901-4 4.
(.51-1.05) (1.
X
001-19 19.001-40 40.001-190 190.001*
04-5.01) (5.02-10.54) (10.57-50.19) (50.2+)
* * *> ..
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLAHTS FLOW PLANTS
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
;
12.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 11.
0 0.
1 99.
7 49.
0 0.
1 99.
2 52.
0 0.
0.0 0 0.
1.0 12 10.
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
2 55.
0 0.
2 14.
1 84.
2 45.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
1 9.
0.0 1 94.
0.5 2 4.
0.7 4 15.
0.4 4 4.
14.1 8 51.
0.0
3 99.
0.0 0 0.
0 0. 1
0 0.
0 0.
1 24.
4 11.
0 0.
1 43.
0 0.
0 0.
4 11.
1 44.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
1 54.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
1 28.
0 0.
0 0.
4 47.
1 3.
1 22.
0 0.
0
o
0
3
0
0
0
0
4
0
o
2
o
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
3
0
0
0 0.0 0
0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
0.0
» 0.0 0 0.0 0
o.o o o.b o o.o o
4..9 3 93.0 0 0.
1.0 11 18.7 2 9.
0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.
5 2.5 14 28.3 5 24.
10 2.8 17 20.7 7 22.
0 0.0
15 3.0 2
0 0.0
1 4.7
4 7.3
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
3 8.8
3 3.8
0 0.0
0 0.0
1 0.2
0 0.0
2 9.8
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
9 0.0 0 0.
1 17.4 4 11.
5.5 0 0.
0.0 0 0.
35.0 5 52.
0.0 0 0.
95.4 0 0.
99.9 0 0.
23.7 > 46.
34.1 3 31.
0.0 0 0.
0.0 1 100.
4.4 1 3.
0.0 0 0.
83.9 0 0.
99.9 0 0.
0.0 0 O.C
0.0 0 O.I
0
3
0
2
5
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
o
0.0 0 0.0 0
0.0 0 0.0 0
0.0 0 0.0 0
0.0 0 0.0 0
0.0 0 0.0 0
FLOW PLANTS FLOH
84.5 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
31.8
0.0
0.0
82.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
54.2
0.0
92.5
35.8
54.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.3
0.0
33.4
50.4
0.0
14.2
94.4
94.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.9
0.0
0.0
44.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
41.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.9
44.5
0.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
,o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
31.8
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
44.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
45.1
99.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
470 11,043 170 0.2 157 1.4 49 1.8 148 14.4
NOTES. I. FLOH RAN6E VALUES IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000. (APPROXIMATE USD IN PARENTHESES).
2. TOTAL STATE FLOH IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000.
54 13.4
10 38.0
79
-------
TABLE 36
TERTIARY TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE BUILT BETWEEN 1982 and 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
Table 36 is a flow summary for all new tertiary treatment plants which will
be constructed between 1982 and 2000. The treatment levels attained by
tertiary plants are defined in terms of the effluent BOD. concentration
and/or the removal of nitrogen. A plant is considered to be tertiary in
design if it is capable of consistently producing an effluent with a BOD,-
concentration less than 10 mg/1 and/or it has specific processes which can
remove more than 50 percent of the total nitrogen present in the plant
influent. A summary is provided for each State and U.S. Territory.
National totals are summarized at the bottom of the table.
In the second column the total number of new tertiary treatment plants to be
constructed in each State is reported. Column three represents the total
treatment capacity value reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
Subsequent columns provide a breakdown of the State totals into seven flow
ranges. The ranges specified in the column headings are reported in
thousand cubic meters per day and, in parentheses beneath the headings, in
million gallons per day. Reported for each flow range are the number of
plants in the range and the percentage of the State tertiary treatment
capacity that is accounted for by each flow range.
Included in this summary are entirely new tertiary plants which are planned
to be constructed by the year 2000. Excluded are tertiary plants that were
operational in 1982 and primary, advanced primary, secondary, and advanced
secondary plants planned to be upgraded to tertiary treatment by the year
2000.
Some column entries will be found which list a value for the number of
plants but show zero for Total Design Flow or Percent of Flow. This occurs
when the design flow value is less than 0.5 or the percent value is less
than 0.05; in these cases the value is rounded to zero.
80
-------
DECEMBER 11, 1982
TABLE 56
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
TSRTIARV T»EATMENT FACH1TIES TO BE BUILT BETWEEN 1982 AND 2000
(BY TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FLOW)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
HIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEM MEXICO
NEW VORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
CKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINM
NASHIHGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
TOTAL
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
i
2
3
i
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
4
0
45
32
0
29
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
13
0
3
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
DESIGN
FLOW
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
88
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
1
90
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
15
0
<9
71
0
29
0
0
6
0
14
2
1°7
0
0
17
0
5
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0-.4
(0-.10)
1C
PLANTS FLOW
1
C
I
0
e
24
27
0
ta
0
0
i
0
;
0.0
0.0
0.0
43.2
0.0
0.0
17.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
56.7
0.0
0.0
99.9
0.0
99.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.0
6.5
0.0
14.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.0
2.8
n S'S
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
4 5.2
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
an n
u * u
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
.401-1.9 1.901-4 4.001-19
(.11-. 50) (.51-1.05) (1.06-5.01)
y g g
PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOW
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
15
2
0
6
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0.0
0.0
0.0
56.7
0.0
0.0
82.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.9
3.0
43.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.
0.
19.
1.
0.
19.2
0.0
0.0
57.7
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.6
0.0
36.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.3
4.7
0.0
47.5
0.0
0.0
39.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.7
0.0
63.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
q.o
0.0
0.0
99.9
85.3
0.0
39.0
0.0
0.0
19.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.1
0.0
0.0
99.9
0.0
0.0
47.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.001-40 40.001-190
(5.02-10.56) (10.57-50.19)
PLANTS FLOW
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
96.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
87.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PLANTS FLOW
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
99.9
95.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
190.001+
(50.2+)
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
FLOW
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 0
o!o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
U.S. TOTALS 157 530 84 3.2 43 7.1 10 5.9
NOTES: 1. FLOW RANGE VALUES IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000. (APPROXIMATE MGD
2. TOTAL STATE FLOW IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000.
12 19.6
IN PARENTHESES).
19.9
81
-------
TABLE 37
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW TERTIARY
TREATMENT FACILITIES, BY PLANT SIZE
Table 37 summarizes the projected costs, reported in January 1982 dollars
for the construction of new tertiary treatment plants to be built between
1982 and 2000. Table 37 is a direct extension of Table 36.
The summary indicates a total dollar need per State for new tertian'
facilities. The State totals are broken down into dollar needs by flow
range. The dollar needs of an individual plant are included in the total
for the flow range shown which encompasses a plant's projected design
capacity. 3
82
-------
DECEMBER SI, ItSJ
TAILI 17
t»ej NEEDS SUIVEY
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CONSTRUCTION Ot NEH TERTIARY TREATMENT FACILITIES, »Y PLANT SIZE
(THOUSANDS Ot Itll DOLLARS)
» TOTAL PROJECTED DESIGN FIOH
CUBIC METERS PER DAV X 10001
(MILLION 6ALLONS PER DAY)
STATE
UABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
JIST. OF COLUM.
-LORIOA
3EORGIA
-IAMAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IONA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
MEW JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TER*.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
4
0
0
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
4
0
45
92
0
2)
0
0
5
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
13
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
JS7
STATE
NEEDS
1,87
0
0
52, U*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,307
11, MS
3.SS*
0
SI, 3(0
0
0
(Ot
0
0
0
0
14.330
10,081
0
8,044
3S.452
0
33, IS*
0
0
«,734
0
0
0
15,338
0
t,(03
0
0
0
0
0
347,S4S
0-.40
(0-.10)
NEEDS
0
0
1,J2(
0
0
S(3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,((0
0
0
0
0
(0(
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30,ess
»,IOB
0
11,414
0
0
5«0
7(0
1,40
S8.780
.401-1.*
(.11-.SO)
NEED!
0
0
0
I4(
0
0
11,35*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,307
0
i,a»
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14,0*5
l.S»(
0
4,44S
0
0
J.(»2
0
\
0
0
0
7,4*3
0
a.(03
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
S3,038
l.*01-4.0
(.31-1.05)
NEEDS
3,44
3,744
0
I0,(«(
0
0
2,4*2
0
0
(SO
0
0
0
0
4.001-1*
(l.Ot-5.01)
NEEDS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
14,330
10,081
0
31,(10
0
0
(,(41
0
0
0
0
(,»0»
0
0
0
0
0
3,787
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75,3««
1*.001-40 40.001-1*0 1*0.001*
(5.02-10.SO (10.57-50.1*) (50.2*)
NEEDS
NEEDS
NEEDS
11,31
20,50
32,U
47,*1
31,81*
100,040
83
-------
TABLE 38
NATIONAL DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CHANGES IN EXISTING TREATMENT PLANTS
Table 38 summarizes the dollar needs for changes to treatment facilities
which were in operation in 1982.
The table is divided into three sections. The first section details the
planned changes and costs by present design level of treatment for all
treatment facilities in operation in 1982. Sections two and three summarize
the costs to upgrade and enlarge and upgrade presently operating facilities
from the current level of treatment to the level projected in year 2000. A
detailed explanation of the change categories is given in the discussion
accompanying Table 3.
In the section illustrating Dollar Needs by Type of Planned Change, large
needs are shown for plants listed in the Other and No Change columns. A
number of situations are covered in these categories. One common situation
is a treatment plant which will require a capital expenditure, such as for a
new sludge digester, but the degree of treatment and hydraulic capacity will
not be changed.
The largest total dollar needs are for changes to existing secondary
treatment plants. In section one it can be seen that over 7,900 secondary
treatment facilities are currently in operation. The total dollar needs for
these facilities between 1982 and 2000 are projected at over $10 billion.
Section two indicates that almost 600 of the secondary treatment facilities
in operation will be upgraded at a cost of almost $1 billion, and section
three indicates that almost 900 of the secondary plants will be enlarged and
upgraded at a cost of nearly $4 billion. The remaining secondary treatment
dollar needs are for enlargements or other, changes that do not involve an
upgrade in the level of treatment.
The actual number of sites being upgraded and enlarged and upgraded from one
level of treatment to another is summarized in Table 39.
84
-------
1*82 NEE
NATIONAL DOLLAR NEEDS FOR CHANS
(THOUSANDS OF
TYPE
RAH DISCHARGE
LESS THAN SECONDARY
SECONDARY
ADVANCED SECONDARY
TERTIARY
NO DISCHARGE
TOTAL
TYPE
RAH DISCHARGE
LESS THAN SECONDARY
SECONDARY
ADVANCED SECONDARY
TERTIARY
NO DISCHARGE
TOTAL
TYPE
RAW DISCHARGE
LESS THAN SECONDARY
SECONDARY
ADVANCED SECONDARY
TERTIARY
NO DISCHARGE
TOTAL
t OF
PLANTS
188
3,111
7.»4(
2,52*
231
1.400
15.il}
t OF
PLANTS
188
»45
580
178
11
8
I,»10
t OF
PLANTS
0
1.058
871
206
10
It
2. 1H
TOTAL
DOLLAR
NEEDS
1.2*6,21*
7. Ml. (82
10,0*). 385
(.437.748
2(0. (42
448. 75*
2(, 484. 452
TOTAL
DOLLAR
NEEDS
1.294,219
2,484, 577
982,321
514,214
2,544
5.528
5.282,805
TOTAL
DOLLAR
NEEDS
0
3.745.511
3,»72.569
1,801,832
(4.557
27.522
9,411,991
ENLARGE UPGRADE
0 1,2*6,21*
141,273 2,484.577
2.»14.088 982,321
2.254,024 514.214
143. 8»» 2.344
284,448 5.328
5,751.134 5,282.805
LESS THAN
SECONDARY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LESS THAN
SECONDARY
0
54,554
0
0
0
0
54,554
DS SURVEY
IES IN EXIS
1*82 DOLL,
ENLARGE I
UPGRADE
0
3.745,511
3.972.549
1.801,832
(4.557
27,522
TING TREATHENT PLANTS
»»S)
EEDS BY TYPE OF PLANNE!
REPLACE OTHER
0 0
V40.782 557,224
885.2*0 I, 337. (52
7*,*(2 1.775.77*
0 38. (33
*S,747 35.511
9,611,991 2.001.781 3,742,7**
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR PLANTS TO BE Ul
ADVANCED
SECONDARY SECONDARY
1,183,»(5
2,230,844
34,047
0
0
210
3,44>,088
NEEDS FOR
SECONDARY
0
2,805,982
110,083
0
0
14,508
2,*30,573
78.*((
21*,*00
843,980
494,454
0
0
1,(4».502
PLANTS TO BE ENLARGED
ADVANCED
SECONDARY
0
715.744
3,1*5,330
1,373,008
0
*.418
5. 29*. 522
DECEMBER 31
TABLE 38
ABANDON
0
34,996
0
0
0
0
34,994
TERTIARY
17, (41
25.255
58,0*0
12.048
2,544
0
115,380
AND UPGRADED
TERTIARY
0
100,784
408,812
Ztl.SH
44,307
0
818,42*
, 1*82
ABANDON.
RETAIN NO
SENERS CHANGE
0
15,51*
7,4(5
7.3*3
0
0
30.377
NO
DISCHARGE
15. (47
8.356
26,204
15.510
0
3,118
(8,835
NO
DISCHARGE
0
70,425
258,344
1«,2*8
18,250
1,596
514. »13
0
0
0
(.542
11.207
0
17,74*
85
-------
TABLE 39
NATIONAL SUMMARY OF TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES
FOR PLANTS OPERATING IN 1982
Table 39 summarizes the upgrades projected for facilities in operation in
1982.
The Present Totals column gives the total number of facilities and total
present design flow for plants that will undergo some type of upgrade
between 1982 and 2000. The columns to the right of Present Totals show the
number of facilities and the projected design flow after the upgrades.
For example, 1,451 existing secondary facilities with current design flows
of approximately 13,673,000 cubic meters per day will be upgraded by the
year 2000. The level to which each will be upgraded is listed to the right
of the Present Total. The projected design flow of these plants following
upgrade will total 18,700,000 cubic meters per day for all levels of
treatment in 2000, which is the total of the flows listed as the second item
under each projected level of treatment. The difference in flow between the
projected 18,700,000 cubic meters per day and the present 13,673,000 cubic
meters per day represents treatment plants being enlarged, as well as
upgraded.
The costs involved to accomplish the various upgrades are summarized in
Table 38.
All flows are reported in thousand cubic meters per day.
A facility may show an upgrade even though the general level of treatment is
not changed. For example, a plant can upgrade from an advanced secondary
level to an advanced secondary level. This can occur because the general
levels of treatment represent a range of effluent values rather than a
single value.
86
-------
PRESENT
LEVEL Of
TREATMENT
RAH DISCHARGE
LESS THAN SECONDARY
SECONDARY
ADVANCED SECONDARY
TERTIARY
NO DISCHARGE
DECEMBER 31, 1X2
1982 NEEDS SURVEY T*BLE *'
NATIONAL SUMMARY OF TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES
FOR PLANTS OPERATING IN 1982
PRESENT
TOTALS
188 SITES
Ul KCMD
2,003 SITES
16,536 KCMD
1,451 SITES
13, 473 KCMD
384 SITES
13,555 KCMD
21 SITES
491 KCMD
24 SITES
58 KCMD
4,071 SITES
44,478 KCMD
NO LESS THAN ADVANCED
DISCHARGE SECONDARY SECONDARY SECONDARY
13 SITES
1 KCMD
0.8 X RON
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
85 SITES
199 KCMD
1.0 X ROU
12.7 X COL
0.3 X ALL
83 SITES
805 KCMD
4.3 X ROM
51.3 X COL
1.4 X ALL
25 SITES
442 KCMD
2.7 X RON
28.2 X COL
0.8 X ALl
4 SITES
113 KCMD
14.5 X ROU
7.2 X COL
0.2 X ALL
8 SITES
5 KCMD
6.2 X ROU
0.3 X COL
0.0 X ALL
218 SITES
1,567 KCMD
J.8 .X ROM
100.0 X COL
2.8 % ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
2 SITES
734 KCMD
3.8 X ROM
100.0 X COL
1.3 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROM
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROM
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
2 SITES
734 KCMD
1.3 X ROM
100.0 X COL
1.3 X ALL
142 SITES
144 KCMD
89.6 X ROU
1.0 X COL
0.2 X ALL
1,512 SITES
13,023 KCMD
(8.0 X ROU
92.9 X COL
23.7 X ALL
98 SITES
778 KCMD
4.1 X ROM
5.5 X COL
1.4 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X RDU
0.0 X CDL
0.0 X ALL
9 SITES
(0 KCMD
(9.2 X ROM
0.4 X COL
0.1 X ALL
1,761 SITES
14,007 KCMD
25.4 X ROU
100.0 X COL
25.4 X ALL
29 SITES
13 KCMD
8.1 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
352 SITES
4, (84 KCMD
24.4 X ROU
14.4 X COL
8.5 X ALL
1,133 SITES
15,546 KCMD
83.1 X ROM
47.8 X COL
28.2 X ALL
294 SITES
12,236 KCMD
76.1 X ROU
37.6 X COL
22. 2 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
7 SITES
21 KCMD
24.4 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
1,815 SITES
32,502 KCMD
59.1 X ROU
100.0 X COL
59.1 X ALL
TERTIARY
4 SITES
2 KCMD
1.2 X ROU
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
52 SITES
500 KCMD
2.6 X ROU
8.1 X COL
0.9 X ALL
137 SITES
1,571 KCMD
8.4 X ROM
25.6 X COL
2.8 X ALL
65 SITES
3,391 KCMD
21.1 X ROU
55.3 X COL
6.1 X ALL
17 SITES
663 KCMD
85.4 X ROU
10.8 X COL
1.2 X ALL
0 SITES
0 KCMD
0.0 X ROM
0.0 X COL
0.0 X ALL
275 SITES
6.129 KCMD
11.1 X ROU
100.0 X COL
11.1 X ALL
NOTES:
I. PERCENTAGES ARE FUNCTION OF FLOU IN ROM, COLUMN ASD OVERALL!ALL).
2. FLOH VALUES ARE PROJECTED DESIGN FLOHS IN CUBIC METERS PER DAY X 1000 (KCMD).
87
-------
TABLE 40
ANALYSIS OF LIQUID EFFLUENT DISPOSAL
NUMBER OF RESPONSES
Table 40 summarizes the methods utilized by municipal sewerage authorities
to dispose of the liquid effluents generated by treatment works. The
summary describes the current situation (1982) and the changes expected to
occur.
The Current Status portion of the table lists the liquid effluent disposal
methods reported in the Survey. The total methods in operation are greater
than the total number of facilities because more than one method may be
employed by a treatment facility. The lower portion of the table provides a
breakdown of the various effluent disposal methods and the changes projected
to occur. A brief explanation of each disposal method is given below:
Outfall to Surface Waters: Direct discharge to a body of fresh water.
Ocean Outfall: Direct discharge to an ocean, estuary, or bay.
Groundwater Recharge: Disposal of effluent via deep well or other methods
in order to replenish a groundwater aquifer for the purpose of municipal,
agricultural or industrial reuse, or to control salt water intrusion or land
subsidence.
Other Land Disposal: Disposal of effluent on public or private land for
other than agricultural purposes (municipal golf course watering, highway
right-of-way maintenance, etc). No effluent recovery is practiced.
Recycling and Reuse: Direct reuse of effluent for purposes other than
irrigation in an industrial process, such as cooling or quenching. Also
included is reuse or reclamation of the water for other than irrigation.
Septic Tank Field: Discharge of untreated waste to a septic tank with
effluent disposal to a leach field or cesspool.
Other: Any method of disposal not described elsewhere in this section.
No Discharge: No discharge to surface or groundwaters such as complete
retention in an evaporation lagoon.
Spray Irrigation: Reuse of treated effluent in agriculture by spraying.
Ditch Irrigation: Reuse of treated effluent in agriculture using a ditch,
swale, or other surface flow method.
To Other WwT Plants: Direct transmission of treated effluent from a
treatment plant, or raw wastes from a separate collection system, to another
treatment facility for further treatment prior to final disposal.
The numbers shown for the septic tank fields refer to the number of
communities or authorities that use septic tanks. The numbers are high
88
-------
because of the need to replace, on a national basis, many failing septic
systems with better treatment systems. In contrast, fewer of the other
types of effluent disposal require change. Septic tank fields and treatment
plants that discharge to surface waters are the most common effluent
disposal techniques and, therefore, more of these authorities/facilities
will be undergoing changes of some type. This is evident by the large total
number of changes for these disposal methods shown in the lower portion of
the table.
The values listed in the rows and columns of this table are not necessarily
additive or cumulative. Any one facility may have a variety of effluent
disposal methods and any one of the methods can be undergoing change
independently.
89
-------
DECEMBER II, 1982
TABLE 40
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
ANALYSIS OF LIQUID EFFLUENT DISPOSAL
NUMBER OF RESPONSES
UNITED STATES TOTAL
IN OPERATION
42,171
XKKXxxDISPOSAL METHODxxxxxx
OUTFALL TO SURFACE MATERS
OCEAN OUTFALL
GROUND WATER RECHARGE
OTHER LAND DISPOSAL
RECYCLING AND REUSE
SEPTIC TANK FIELD
OTHER
NO DISCHARGE
SPRAY IRRIGATION
DITCH IRRIGATION
TO OTHER HUT PLANTS
X*XTOTAL*»*
"CURRENT STATUS*
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1,033
ENLARGE
414
10
4
0
3
1
1
9
19
2
212
675
UPGRADE
297
2
2
1
1
3,161
0
2
1
5
20
3,492
REQUIRED, BUT NOT YET
APPROVED OR FUNDED
10,014
NATURE OF PROJECTED CHANGExxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ENLARGE
AND NEW NO
UPGRADE CONST. REPLACE ABANDON CHANGE OTHER
377
5
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
4
8
406
6,078
142
55
68
51
174
17
643
504
98
3,108
10,938
259
23
3
0
0
5
1
2
0
3
7
303
1,970
46
25
6
4
15,264
15
272
28
16
40
17,686
10,317
215
113
26
44
4,428
29
834
461
279
3,458
20,204
30
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
6
38
«*»TOTAL«««
19,742
443
203
102
104
23,037
64
1.763
1,017
408
6,859
53,742
90
-------
TABLE 41
SUMMARY OF TREATMENT AND SLUDGE HANDLING PROCESSES
NUMBER OF PLANTS AND ASSOCIATED FLOW
UNITED STATES TOTAL
Table 41 summarizes the inventory of unit processes that was compiled during
the 1982 Survey. Items 1 through 64 refer to the liquid line, items 65
through 95 refer to the sludge line, and items 96 through AD list
miscellaneous processes and types of controls. Table 42 expands the data
available for each of the 112 items.
Three categories of information were developed for each item (unit process)
For each process, information is provided as to whether a process is Now in
Use, Under Construction, or Required But Not Yet Funded. In each category
the total number of processes is listed along with an associated total flow
For the Now In Use category, total flow was compiled from the present design
flow of the facilities. For the Under Construction and Required But Not Yet
Funded categories, total flow was compiled from the projected design flows.
A unit process as defined here includes the complete process. For example
activated sludge includes the aeration basin, associated blowers and other
integral mechanical equipment, and the secondary clarifier. These items are
not listed separately.
Multiple or parallel processes are counted as one process for any single
facility. For example, if a facility has four aerobic digesters, the number
of aerobic digesters counted in this summary is one, not four. Therefore,
the Number column denotes the number of plants using that process.
91
-------
OICINIII 11, tttl
TAIL! 41
It!! NEEOf SUIVEV
SUHNAIY OF TREATMENT AND SLUDGE HANDLING PROCESSES
NUNICIS OF PLANT! AND AliOCIATiO FLOM
(FLOH IN THOUSANDS OF CUIIC METER! 'It OAY)
UNITED STATi! TOTAL
RtQUlttO IUT
UNDEI NOT VIT
MOW IN USE COHITIUCTION FUNOIO
NUMBER FIOH NUNIEI FION NUNIII PL OH
TIIATHINT PROCESSES
I. PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - IAI SCIEEN
1. PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - MIT IEHOVAI
4. PIELIHINARV TREATMENT - COMH1NUTOI!
S. PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - OTHEIS
t. SCUH IEHOVAI
7. FLOU EQUALIZATION IAIIN*
S. PREAEIATION
). PRIMARY SEOINENTATION
10. TIICKL1NG FIITEI - ROCK MEDIA
11. TRICKLING F1LTEI - FtASTIC NCDIA
11. TIICKLINC FUTEI - IEDMOOD SLAT!
1]. TRICKLING FIITEI - OTHEt MEDIA
14. ACTIVATED SLUDGE - CONVENTIONAL
11. ACTIVATED SLUDGE - HISH IATE
It. ACTIVATED SLUDGE - CONTACT STABILIZATION
17. ACTIVATED SLUDGE - EXTENDED AEIATIOH
19. PU«t OXYGEN ACTIVATED SLUDGE
If. BIO-DISC (IOTATING BIOLOGICAL FIITEI)
20. OXIDATION OITCH USING MECHANICAL lt«ATO«S
21. CLAHIFICATION USING TUBE SETTLE*!
22. SECONDAIV CLAI1FICATION
2]. BIOLOGICAL NITIIF ICATION - SEPAIATE STAGE
24. BIOLOGICAL NITRIFICATION - BOO > NIT.
25. BIOLOGICAL DENITR1FICATION
It. POST AERATION IREAERATION)
27. HICROSTRAINER5 - PRIMARY
2B. HICROSTRAINERS - SECONDARY
2t. SAND FILTERS
JO. MIX-MEDIA FILTERS (SAND AND COAL)
31. OTHER FILTRATIONS
12. ACTIVATED CARBON - GRANULAR
J). ACTIVATED CARBON - PONDERED
34. TUO STAGE LIME TREATMENT OF RAN NASTEUATER
IS. TUO STAGE TERTIARY LIME TREATMENT
It. SINGLE STAGE LIME TREATMENT OF RAH UASTENATEB
S7. SINGLE STAGE TERTIARY LIKE TREATMENT
39. RECARBONATION
It. NEUTRALIZATION
40. ALUM ADDITION TO PRIMARY
41. ALUi! ADDITION TO SECONDARY
42. ALU1 ADDITION TO SEPARATE STAGE TERTIARY
43. FERRI-CHLOR1DE ADDITION TO PRIMARY
44. FERR1-CHLORIOE ADDITION TO SECONDARY
45. FERRI-CHLORIOE ADDITION TO SEPAIATE STAGE TERTIAIV
47. ION EXCHANGE
49. BREAKPOINT CHLORINATION
4t. AHONIA STRIPPING
:o. OEO:LORINATION
il. CHLORINATION FOR DISINFECTION
52. 020NATION FOR DISINFECTION
51. OTHER DISINFECTION
54. LAND TREATMENT OF PRIMARY EFFLUENT
59. LAND TREATMENT OF SECONDARY EFFLUENT (10/10)
it. LAND TREATMENT OF INTERMEDIATE EFFLUENT
57. STABILIZATION PONDS
SB. AERATED LAGOONS
St. OUTFALL PUMPING
tO. OUTFALL DIFFUSER
tl. EFFLUENT TO OTHER PLANTS
tl. El FLUENT OUTFALL
t3. OTHER TREATMENT
t4. RECALCIHATION
SLUDGE HANDLING METHODS
tS. AEROBIC DIGESTION - All
t7. COMPOSTING
tS. ANAEROC1C DIGESTION
tt. SLUDGE LAGOONS
71. CHLORINE OXIDATION OF SLUDGE 1 PUR IF AX)
72. LIME STABILIZATION
71. MET AIR OXIDATION
74. AIR DRYING
79. DEUATERING - MECHANICAL - VACUUM FIITEI
71. DEUATERING - MECHANICAL - CENTRIFUGE
71. DEUATERING - MECHANICAL - FILTER PRESS
79. DEUATERING - OTHERS
7t. GRAVITY THICKENING
90. AIR FLOTATION THICKENING
91. INCINERATION - MULTIPLE HEAITH
92. INCINERATION - FLUIDIZED BEDS
91. INCINERATION - IOTARV KILN
94. INCINERATION - OTHEIS
9S. PYROLYS1S
9i. CO-INCINERATION UITN SOLID UASTE
97. CO-PVROLYSIS UITH SOLID UASTE
99. CO-INCINERATION - OTHEIS
9t. LAND FILL
tO. LAND SPREADING OF LIQUID SLUDGE
tl. LAND SPREADING OF THICKENED SLUDGE
92. TRENCHING
11. OCEAN DUMPING
t4. OTHER SLUDGE HANDLING
tS. DIGEST GAS UTILIZATION FACILITIES
MISCELLANEOUS
t7. FULLY AUTOMATED USING DIGITAL CONTROL
tt: s^rAuyoS^HV^6 ANALOS c<""""-s
Al. MANUALLY OPERTEO AND CONTIOLLEO PLAHT
A2. PACKAGE PLANT
Al. SEMI-PACKAGE PLAHT
A4. CUSTOM BUILT PLANT
AS. IMHOFF TANKS
At. SEPTIC TANKS
A7. ELECTIODIALVSIS
19. REVERSE OSMOSIS
At. PtESSURE FILTERS
AA. SEEPAGE LAGOONS
AI. ROCK FILTERS
AC. POLYMER ADDITION TO LIQUID STREAM
AD. POLYMEI ADDITION TO SLUDGE STREAM
».234
4.451
4.107
71
400
501
427
1. 100
2.542
71
4«
14
2.14t
2t
1.272
2.010
91
25B
t!2
45
t07
its
551
40
t2t
31
95
1.441
2tO
41
25
1
14
It
2t
.S
50
17
77
421
7t
itt
11
9t
1
10
t
201
5.49?
10
t
7t
572
190
5.1-4
1.2t7
271
91
IB
11.724
41t
2t
1.14t
51
29
4.181
til
It}
40
74
51
t.729
1.17}
242
151
3t
795
221
101
22
9
IS
2
7
12
2
7.452
1.017
l.llt
9
41
291
20t
8.447
44
,o.t!!
4.5t4
I,t72
1.CB1
11.7tl
422
105
0
0
1
»2t
4
It
14
f t.814
115.725
tt.tol
41,01}
2.497
25.114
Il,t7t
25.391
10B.497
21.021
2.115
1.0t4
191
tt.sat
i.iti
11.204
t.)4t
11. fit
2.152
l.57t
4tO
t.ist
10.121
12.250
1.424
14,947
1,501
2.4tS
11.711
1.715
940
1.179
217
4fl
t27
524
I.t71
1.2tS
204
2.2BI
9. til
1,127
5.741
5.991
257
1. 7tl
a
too
in
3.143
12,081
1.701
4.701
tl
3. 183
159
12.122
5.115
11,014
5,7t4
247
127.137
5.210
1.154
11,957
501
1,175
84.171
It, 151
1}.94Q
1.522
3.70}
3.240
51.34t
54.110
14. OH
5.594
1.941
45.209
15,i07
27,1'1
1.11^
555
1.101
f?
240
lit
20
81.011
11.510
21.115
1.24}
11.256
13.043
13.1)t
I07»2t 1
t,B75
t.334
"i-.u;
1.094
t.lff
125,011
40t
21
0
0
17
114
25
4.74t
2.011
281
354
220
201
5
11
to
21
114
1
IS
1
0
114,
t
It
1!«
10
110
lit
1
74
tl
130
9
IBS
10
17
227
52
9
t
4
1
4
S
It
7
0
}
tl
11
,4
S
12
0
2
0
42
495
10
It
14
94
2}
171
ISt
47
9
1
115
10
2
215
7
10
to
21
10
5
t
1
21t
7t
17
41
I
74
40
14
0
1
0
4
0
0
245
47
tt
1
0
25
10
175
7
.si
75
72
105
4
11
4
1 . tZS
2.510
2.330
1.511
45
l.tOl
l.Olt
114
1.712
121
114
11
0
1.225
7t»
411
511
1.9tS
1.717
J»2
IB
93
tei
2.182
40
1,175
47
IBS
l.ttB
1.07B
290
329
21!
t
142
174
1.510
412
0
22
1.142
1!
LIU
2*511
0
111
0
111
2.401
512
57
12
its
27
250
171
2.424
ISt
51
l.Ott
40t
45
2.ttt
tt
112
1.915
. )8t
2. til
97
240
37
1.130
1. 191
t24
4.02t
15
2.151
2.517
1.410
22
0
114
0
J12
0
0
1.150
274
1.473
7
0
1.412
211
2. 1BI
2. tt2
20
1.182
144
12
120
1,857
1
1
0
0
0
10
0
25
128
1* 191
5.847
I,t75
1.415
11
41
45*
il
1.5tt
44
55
It
t
l.Olt
»
101
1.514
27
15*
515
12
3tl
402
1.151
51
152
15
40
2.148
17}
25
1)
t
t
10
8
51
11
15
15
450
*t
42
12
24
}
II
2
112
t.tfB
It
21
21
477
tl
l.ltt
l.tll
141
)7
15
5.711
100
10
1.87S
12
27
tt7
11(1
2t
7
10
1
2. Alt
It}
54
|}t
}}
122
108
il
1.8}
14
27
117
4t
5.447
is
4.1,5
2.742
1.005
ett
5.055
t
42
0
0
2
4tt
10
71
84
8. 178
11.018
10.711
5.11!
71
1.144
11.111
2,101
8.282
580
1.141
111
451
11,411
218
1,314
2.40t
.740
,12)
,545
It
.870
,114
,047
.711
.481
10<
802
10.104
4.208
101
l.ltt
17
252
24t
401
178
148
114
811
4.824
555
»t
19J
445
40
1*462
2
1.404
If 554.
524
105
14
2.450
140
1.171
1*449
1.042
1.571
440
10*172
1.471
205
5.779
140
1*405
7.548
2.180
1.198
79
414
297
4.290
8.052
10*587
7.109
1.S45
7.205
9.045
7.911
1*097
1* 170
281
89
ft
171
17
11 1 175
1.212
1*729
o
147
10.487
5.591
11*121
491
1.345
10.244
2.144
470
1*14
10*89
t
15
190
12
407
2*042
92
-------
TABLE 42
PROJECTED CHANGE IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF PLANTS AND ASSOCIATED FLOW
Table 42 is a national summary of the number of plants, the total flow, and
the projected change information collected pertaining to unit processes.
Table 42 is an expansion of the summary presented in Table 41 with each unit
process presented in greater detail. Table 42 includes for each unit
process the total number installed throughout the nation. As some of these
unit processes are installed in plants but are not presently in use, the
totals in Table 42 may be greater than those shown in Table 41 for a given
process. Table 41 does not include the unit processes that are installed
but for some reason are not presently being used.
For easy reference the summaries are presented in the same sequence as in
Table 41. For instance, preaeration which is item 8 in Table 41, can be
found under item 42-8 in this table. The last number refers to the Table 41
item number.
Flows associated with each unit process are the sum of the total plant flows
for all the facilities using that particular process. All flows are given
in thousand cubic meters per day. The present design flow was used for
processes shown under the Now In Use column. The projected design flow was
used for processes in the Under Construction and Required But Not Yet Funded
columns.
The information for each unit process is divided into two general categories
shown in the table as Type 1 and Type 2 Estimates. Type 1 information was
obtained from preliminary engineering designs. Type 2 information was
generally developed using EPA cost estimating procedures together with
commonly accepted treatment practices for the geographic area.
The projected change codes in column one are defined in the narrative
accompanying Table 3.
93
-------
DECEMBER 51.
TABLE 42
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANGE IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF PLANTS AND ASSOCIATED FLQU
(FLOW IN THOUSAi.LS OF CUBIC HETERS PER DAY)
42-1 PUMPING.RAH HASTEMATER
PROCESS
TOTAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHES
TOTAL
PLANTS
1,204 It
221 4
402 (
3,1*5 10
SIS 5
(92 I
4,020 (0
J
10,550107
FLOH
,70»
,152
,1!1
,554
,»70
,(52
,884
(5
,82*
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
588
174
334
0
24!
175
3,459
3
5,482
FLOH
12,513
1,531
5,935
0
5.7»7
3.574
54,430
45
87,847
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
283
0
0
0
0
283
FLOH
0
0
0
1,922
0
0
0
0
1,922
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
857
0
0
0
0
857
FLOH
0
0
0
4,030
0
0
0
0
4,030
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
414
45
44
0
(8
17
541
0
1,373
FLOH
4,197
420
194
0
82
77
4,455
0
9,t29
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOt
PLANTS
FLOH
000
0 (
0
000
2
0
0
0
0
2,553
0
0
0
0
2 1 2,553
2,40
2,403
42-2 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - BAR SCREEN
PROCESS
TOTAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADr
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
HEM PPOCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
P
1
4
5
LANT!
,387
2(1
423
,243
432
921
,827
1
> FLOU
21,382
4,118
4,882
14,737
3,903
4,309
77,783
12
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
(78
181
326
0
308
8>7
5,025
1
FLOU
It, 852
3,874
4,420
0
3,731
4,242
48,535
12
PLANTS
0
0
0
354
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
2.521
0
0
0
0
PLANTS
0
0
0
1,182
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
7,456
0
0
0
0
NDU IN USE
PLANTS
709
80
97
0
124
24
802
0
FLOH
4,531
243
242
0
171
47
9,280
0
2
l»
T
T<
0
0
0
ESTIMATE
IDER
UCTION
> FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
4,704 3,5(3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
15,495130,128 7,41(101,8(8
354 2,521 1,182 7,(58 1,854 14,557
4,704 3,5(3
42-3 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - GRIT REMOVAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
700 17,150
145 4,914
283 5,457
1,894 13,212
193 3,484
370 2,944
2,748 (5.347
2 173
UNDER
NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU
405 13,39(
107 4,704
242 5,438
0 0
1(0 3,576
359 2,921
2,443 57,134
2 173
PLANTS
0
0
0
221
0
(
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
2.341
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
(44
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
9.102
0
0
0
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
295
38
41
0
33
11
325
0
FLOH PLANTS
3,753
207
219
0
110
23
8.211
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PLANTS
0
0
0
1,009
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
1,7(9
0
0
0
0
(,357113,084 3,718 87,347
((( 9,102
743 12,525
1.009 1,7(9
42-4 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - COHMINUTORS
PROCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TO
PLANTS
543
134
2(1
1.649
147
375
2, (31
0
TAL
FLOH
7. 553
933
2,458
7.054
1,015
2,095
31.983
0
NOU
PLANTS
317
88
205
0
148
3(7
2,314
0
N USE
FLOH
5.027
83(
2,245
0
911
2.07*
28,810
0
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE M»M*MW»»»»»»» *»«p*i»,*
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
0
202
0
0
0
0
CTION
FLOH
0
0
0
1,530
0
0
0
0
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
0
0
585
0
0
0
0
NDED
FLOU
0
0
0
4,102
0
0
0
0
NOH It
PLANTS
226
46
56
0
19
8
315
0
< USE
FLOH
2,526
97
212
0
104
15
3,174
0
I Trt e. ea i in* i e »»»""
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT Fl
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
000
000
000
1 0 881
000
000
000
000
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
1,423
0
0
0
0
5,780 53,095 3,441 39,909
202 1,530
(70 (.130
881 1,423
42-5 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT - OTHERS
PROCESS
TOTAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PLANTS
5
2
2
18
3
23
40
0
93
FLOH
49
20
5
122
706
85
1,619
0
2,410
NOU IN USE
PLANTS
2
2
2
0
3
13
29
0
51
FLOU
29
20
5
0
706
49
1.402
0
2.235
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
FLOH
0
0
0
43
0
0
0
0
43
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
12
FLOH
0
0
0
78
0
0
0
0
73
NOH IN
PLANTS
3
0
0
0
0
10
11
0
24
USE
FLOH
19
0
0
0
0
14
214
0
252
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
-------
42-6 SCUM REMOVAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-7 FLOH EQUALIZATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL NOU IN USE
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS I-LOH
79 2.783 38 1.628
16 9,385
15 815
55 2,945
4 51
32 612
255 11,466
0 0
456 28,061
BASINS
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH F
63 1.745
11 150
13 235
548 14.140
10 67
30 124
382 9.269
1 97
13
0
2
11
220
0
318
LANT5
10
12
0
10
30
3*5
1
9,177
809
0
49
611
8,785
0
21,262
607
0
67
124
8.950
97
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
11 1,601
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
13 1,601
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLDH
0 0
0 0
0 0
89 900
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 n
0
0
29 1
Q
0
0
0
29 1
0
0
,288
Q
0
0
0
,288
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
325 11
0
0
0
0
w
0
0
,705
0
0
0
0
NOH IN USE
2
2
0
2
1
35
0
83
NOH IN
1
1
0
0
27
0
1 I 193
8
5
0
1
0
2,680
0
3,852
USE
2
5
0
0
0
319
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
g
115
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
0
0
1 SS
0
0
0
0
13 55
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
g
13 1,419
0
0
0
0
1.058 25,832
451 10,225
325 11,705
59 1,465
132 1.419
42-8 PREAERATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
60 3.452
20 447
22 727
84 2,736
» 7JO
41 2.160
27", 18.290
0 0
NOH
PLANTS
33
15
20
0
t
44
251
0
IN USE
FLOH
1.610
366
670
0
725
2,165
17,628
0
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
C 0
0 0
d 0
2: 514
II 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
55 2,100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOH IN
PLANTS
27
5
2
0
2
1
24
0
USE
FLOH
1,642
81
$7
0
4
2
462
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
8 12
0
0
0
0
514 28,554
369 23,566
61 2,251
42-9 PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-10 TRICKLING FILTER
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
834 17,320
310 8,444
434 13,264
1,714 10,215
186 3.682
876 3,915
2,666 62,395
6 157
7,026119.395
- ROCK MEDIA
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
176 1,925
275 3.387
198 1,493
54 631
100 662
897 3.902
892 9,725
8 132
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
483 12.170
228 5,946
356 11,328
0 0
159 1,642
805 1,799
2,171 58,659
6 157
4,410 95,904
M«««Mlf««
-------
42-12 TRICKLIHG FILTH - REDWOOD SLATS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANCE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-15 TRICKLING FILTER
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-14 ACTIVATED SLUDGE
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
1«0
2
1
1 142
II
156
34 7*1
0 0
58 1,204
- OTHER MEDIA
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1 4
1 IS
0 0
t 452
D 0
2 8
10 348
0 0
20 833
- CONVENTIONAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
374 9,123
149 10,054
186 8,005
1,213 14,755
JO 2,730
406 4,276
1,207 12,410
1 3
3,566 81,360
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
2
1
1
0
0
3
32
0
39
FLOH
27
2
1
0
0
156
663
0
851
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
1
1
0
0
0
2
10
0
14
4
18
0
0
0
8
548
0
381
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
188 5,404
110 1.526
146 7,984
0 0
28 1,140
J'6 J.999
1,121 30,505
1 3
1,970
58,164
TYPE I ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 11
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 11
TYPE 1 ESTIHATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TYPE 1 ESTIHATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
124 3,225
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
124 3,225
REQUIRED BUT
HOT FUHDED
PLAHTS FLOH
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
11
D
0
0
131
0
0
0
0
131
REQUIRED BUT
HOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
5
0
0
0
451
0
0
0
0
451
REQUIRED BUT
HOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
383 9,530
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
383 «
,530
NOH IN
PLANTS
4
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
7
NOH IN
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOH IN
PLANTS
186
39
40
0
2
30
86
0
383
USE
FLOH
112
0
0
0
0
0
99
0
212
USE
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
USE
FLOH
3,711
528
420
0
1,590
277
1,904
0
t ,440
TYPE Z ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
TYPE 2
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CCTTMAYC
UNDER
CONSTIUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
TYPE 2
0
°
0
CeTTMATF
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
HOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU
0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0
g
o
Q
g
g
g
g
1 0
REQUIRED BUT
HOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
706 2,000
0 0
0 D
0 0
0 D
706 2,000
42-15 ACTIVATED SLUDGE - HIGH RATE
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTS HOT FUNDED NOH IH USE COHSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLAHTS FLOH PLAH1S FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLAHTS FLOH PLAHTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
5
2
5
11
0
16
0
249
480
892
1,016
249
41t
878
0
22
000
1,516 H 1,516
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 799
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 160
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 64
2 14
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U 1.
0 0
0 0
2 55
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
44 4,178
26 3,083
55
42-16 ACTIVATED SLUDGE - COHTACT STABILIZATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
247 5,694
79 606
88 743
334 1,820
11 73
199 759
645 5,320
3 5
NOH IN
PLANTS
80
53
49
0
7
191
603
2
USE
FLOH
5,042
536
587
0
71
742
5,110
4
UHDER REQUIRED BUT
COHSTRUCTION NOT FUHDED
PLAHTS FLOH PLAHTS FLOH
0
0
0
32 42
0
0
0
0
0
0
84 1
0
0
1 0
00 u
0
0
0
,114
0
0
0
0
NOH IN
PLANTS
167
26
39
0
A
8
42
1
USE
FLOU
652
69
155
0
2
16
209
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDEK
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOW
On
«
n
21
0
282
0
0
0
0
1,606 15,024
985 12,096
84 1,114
287 1,107
42-17 ACTIVATED SLUDGE - EXTENDED AERATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
271 1,189
109
128
1,641
16
310
1,195
2
3,672
292
620
2,994
181
463
4,190
8
9 J40
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOU
87 924
51
65
0
16
298
1,120
2
1,639
241
554
0
181
441
3,999
8
6,351
YPE 1 ESTIHATE
UHDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLAHTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
121
0
0
0
0
123
0
0
584
0
0
0
0
584
REQUIRED BUT
HOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0
0
369
0
0
0
0
169
D
0
1.508
0
0
0
0
1,500
NOH IN
PLANTS
184
56
63
0
0
12
75
Q
392
UNDER
USE COHSTRUCTIOt
FLOH PLANTS FLOI
264 0
51 0
65 0
0 3
OA
U
21 0
190 D
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
1 HOT FUNDED
1 PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
g
1,146
0
g
g
0
594 3 1 1.146
g
900
0
Q
0
0
900
96
-------
42-18 PURE OXYGEN ACTIVATED SLUDGE
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-lt BIO-DISC (ROTATING
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
16 2,180
S 618
9 3,828
38 6,746
0 0
7 184
48 5,186
0 0
lit 18,745
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
10
5
5
0
0
4
46
0
72
FLOH
1,237
618
3,828
0
0
170
4.599
0
10,455
BIOLOGICAL FILTER)
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
17 33t
7 20
6 105
465 5,110
3 4
5 16
220 1,866
0 0
723 7,463
42-20 OXIDATION DITCH USING MECHANICAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
92 241
22 51
t 20
671 1,927
2 It
15 18
4t2 1,227
0 0
1,303 3,506
NOH
PLANTS
10
6
5
0
3
4
216
0
244
IN USE
FLOH
It6
It
37
0
4
t
1.858
0
2,126
AERATORS
NOH
PLANTS
10
10
5
0
2
12
464
0
523
IN USE
FLOU
132
32
15
0
It
13
1.170
0
1,384
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 1,865
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 1,865
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
111 1,787
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
111 1,787
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
136 382
0 'J
0 0
0 0
0 0
136 38.!
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
0
27
FLOH
0
0
0
4,867
0
0
0
0
4,867
NOH IH
PLANTS
6
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
t 1
USE
FLOH
942
0
0
0
0
14
586
0
,543
REQUIRED BUT
NOT F
PLANTS
0
0
0
331
0
0
0
0
331
JNDED
FLOH
D
0
0
3,241
0
0
0
0
3,241
NOH IN
PLANTS
7
0
14
USE
FLOM
142
0
<8
0
0
6
8
0
226
REQUIRED BUT
NOT F
PLANTS
0
0
0
142
0
0
0
0
342
UNDED
FLOH
0
0
0
1.278
0
0
0
0
1.278
NOH IN
PLANTS
62
12
4
0
0
3
28
0
lot
USE
FLOH
108
It
5
0
0
4
56
0
It4
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TYPE 2
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CCTTU1TE
UNDER
CONSTR
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
TYPE 2
UCTION
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CeTTMATE
UNDER
CONST!
UCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 13
0 0
D 0
0 0
0 0
1 13
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLON
0 0
0 0
0 0
23 81
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
23 81
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 -0
195 266
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
195 266
42-21 CLARIFICATION USING TUBE SETTLERS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOT
PLANTS
8
3
4
15
0
2
28
0
AL
FLOH
59
31
4t
34
0
t
330
0
NOH I
PLANTS
6
1
4
0
0
2
27
0
N USE
FLOH
12
7
4t
0
0
t
326
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 18
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 7
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOH IN
PLANTS
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
USE
FLOH
27
23
0
0
0
0
3
D
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FU
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
000
000
000
004
000
000
000
000
NDED
FLOM
0
0
0
t
0
0
0
0
42-22 SECONDARY CLARIFICATION
PROCESS
TOTAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PLANTS
87
60
10>
436
36
131
486
1
FLOH F
584
462
1.802
5.991
138
2t4
5.895
15
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
LANTS
62
45
83
0
34
125
452
1
FLOH
526
422
1,703
0
136
292
5,657
15
PLANTS
0
0
0
74
0
0
0
0
FLOH PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
883 24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,574
0
0
0
0
NOW IN
PLANTS
25
15
26
0
2
6
34
0
UNDER
USE CONSTRUCTION
FLOH
58
39
tt
0
1
1
236
0
>LANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
116
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
532
0
0
0
0
1,346 13,182
802 8,754
246 2,574
42-23 BIOLOGICAL NITRIFICATION - SEPARATE STAGE
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS
28
4
8
46(
0
10
145
0
661
FLOH
1.313
98
4,t33
7,865
0
59
S,71t
0
17,989
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
17
2
8
0
0
10
140
0
177
FLOH
529
88
4,t33
0
0
5t
3,618
0
9,220
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
63
0
0
0
0
63
FLOH
0
0
0
683
0
0
0
0
683
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
213
0
0
0
0
213
FLOU
0
0
0
6,21'
0
0
0
0
6,219
NOH IN
PLANTS
11
2
0
0
0
0
5
0
18
USE
FLOH
7t3
t
0
0
0
0
100
0
905
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
ito
0
0
0
0
ito
FLOH
0
0
0
962
0
0
0
0
962
97
-------
42-24 BIOLOGICAL NITRIFICATION - BOD ( NIT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRAD
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
61 907 2Z 489 0 0
10 1,743 9 1.74? r. n
E 25 1,113
1,482 11,228
7 50
21 73
428 8,375
0 0
2.034 23,493
20
0
5
20
408
0
484
1 . 081
0
20
70
7,822
0
11,228
g
130
g
g
0
0
130
2,182
j"
0
0
2,182
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 ~
0
508
0
0
0
0
508
u
0
7.444
0
0
0
0
7,444
UNDER
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLOH
39 417 0 0
1
5
0
2
1
20
0
68
0
32
0
30
2
553
0
1,036
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
844
0
0
0
0
844
0
0
1,102
0
0
0
0
1,602
42-25 BIOLOGICAL DENITRIFICATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPSRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER
TOTAL NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
5 181 1 56 00
00 00 00
1 ' ~
58
0
2
31
2
o
434
Q
15
1.213
1*17?
U 0
0 0
0 0
2 15
26 999
1 7
0 0
8 40
0 0
0 0
P 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED NOH IN
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
004
000
0
19
0
0
0
1
0
260
0
0
0
1,169
1
0
0
g
5
0
UNDER
USE CONSTRUCTION
FLOH PLANTS FLOH
124 0 0
ODD
6
0
0
n
213
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 n
0
31
0
0
g
0
0
332
0
0
Q
0
20 1,430
42-26 POST AERATION (REAERATION)
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
94 2,778 56 2,009 00 00
16 75 14 71 n n A
35
1,137
8
61
712
1
386
9,457
1 j
289
11,297
7
27
0
60
635
1
358 00 00
0 183 1,974 528 6.689
11 0 0 0 0
288 00 00
10.522 00 00
70000
UNDER
NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
38 769 0 0
2 "
8
0
0
1
77
0
4
28
0
0
0
775
0
0 0
0 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
424
0
0
0
0
0
0
793
0
0
0
0
2,064 24,304
801 13,269
183 1,974
528 6,689
126 1,577
42-27 HICROSTRAINERS - PRIMARY
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
UNDER REQUIRED
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
4
1
0
26
0
7
21
0
229
77
0
174
0
25
1,177
0
4 229 00 00
00 00 00
0 C 00 00
0 0 11 67 It 106
00 00 00
7 25 00 00
18 1,173 00 00
00 00 00
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
0
77
0
0
0
0
3
0
ooo
000
00 0
000
000
00 0
000
000
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
42-28 HICROSTRAINERS - SECONDARY
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TO!
PLANTS
14
3
2
58
0
7
59
0
r»L
FLOH
197
50
4
988
0
1,288
955
0
NOH 1
PLANTS
7
1
2
0
0
7
56
0
N USE
FLOU
143
34
4
0
0
1,288
882
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
CTION
FLOU
0
0
0
185
0
0
0
0
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
28
0
0
0
0
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
535
0
0
0
0
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
7 54
2 16
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 73
0 0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FU
PLANTS FIOH PLANTS
000
000
000
0013
000
000
000
000
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
267
0
0
0
0
42-29 SAND FILTERS
PROCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
TOTAL
Til
PLANTS
126
29
33
3,189
11
145
1,101
1
4,635
TAL
FLOU
1.718
246
476
14,622
52
317
8,898
2
26,334
NOH 1
PLANTS
59
22
23
0
9
132
906
1
1,152
IN USE
FLOH
999
226
442
0
48
297
8.240
2
10.256
UNDER (EQUIRED BUT
CONSTRI
PLANTS
0
0
0
230
0
0
0
0
230
ICTION
FLOH
0
0
0
3.668
0
0
0
0
3,668
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
0
0
834
0
0
0
0
834
INDED
FLOH
0
0
0
7.828
0
0
0
0
7.828
NOH II
PLANTS
67
7
10
0
2
13
195
0
294
< USE
FLOU
719
20
34
0
4
20
658
0
1.456
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
CTION
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
o
o
2,125
0
0
0
0
2.125
JNDED
FLOH
0
0
0
3,129
0
0
0
0
>,129
98
-------
42-30 NIX-MEDIA FILTERS (SAND AND COAL>
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS UNDER
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLAHTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
17 1,450 20 1,307 g 0
1 104 3 ln4 n n
229
1
14
201
0
(30
7,584
0
85
7,195
0
5
0
1
14
194
0
494
0
g
85
7,288
g
g
52
Q
Q
0
0
g
1,078
0
0
0
HOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
« 0 17 143 00
0 0
0 0
145 (.017
0 0
g
lit
0
0
00 g
00 7 107
0000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUHDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
4(8
g
g
0
0
4)1 17.451
217 1,280
52 1,078
145 (,017
42-31 OTHER FIITRATIONS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPlACc
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL HOH IN
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
5 571 2
o -
1
11
1
5
29
0
i
3
1,182
0
It
249
0
u
0
g
i
3
25
0
UNDER
USE CONSTRUCTION
FLON PLANTS FLOH
10 0 0
0
0
0
0
15
1(1
0
0 0
0 0
7 221
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED NDH IN
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
003
0 0
0 0
21 872
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1
0
2
4
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FlOW
5(0 00 n n
0
1
0
j
85
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
59
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
4 29
0 0
0 0
0 0
o g
74 2,022
42-32 ACTIVATED CARBON - GRANULAR
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHEP
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLCH PLANTS FLOH
10 00 00
1 57 1 57 on
1
21
g
4
20
0
4S
28
1.810
g
153
1.201
g
1.278
1
0
1
19
g
24
28
g
0
151
.,070
0
1,310
g
4
g
r
0
u
(
g
128
g
g
g
g
128
REQUIRED BUT UNOE|, REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOU
00 10 00 0 g
gn M* __ v v
g
11
0
g
0
0
11
1,487
g
g
0
0
1.487
U
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
u
0
0
0
IK
0
136
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
g
g
4
g
g
14
0
0
0
g
14
42-13 ACTIVATED CARBON - PONDERED
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
», »Nl?T*rL, nu .,?!!? 1NUSE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOU
0
0
u
(
0
0
i
0
U DO
000
000
110 0 0
000
000
297 1 297
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 291
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
g
g
17
g
g
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
g
g
g
g
g
0
0
g
g
Q
g
g
g
g
0
42-14 THO STAGE LIME TREATHENT OF RAH NASTEMATER
EHLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
P"OCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
PtA«T?"t,nu .,?£? ""'" CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
i
0
0
10
0
4
8
g
24
30
g
g
259
0
128
32(
g
752
l
0
g
0
0
4
a
0
11
37
0
0
0
0
128
324
0
493
0
0
g
i
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
(
0
0
0
0
(
0
0
g
5
0
0
0
0
5
g
0
0
239
0
0
g
0
219
1 0
g o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
g g
0 0
1 0
0
0
g
g
g
g
g
g
0
0
g
g
g
0
g
g
0
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
4
Q
g
g
12
g
g
g
0
12
42-35 THO STAGE TERTIARY LIME TREATMENT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
EHLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
. .^°TAL N°" IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FIOH PLANiS FLOU PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
9
0
0
u
0
1
14
0
1* 2 45
000
000
5C4 0 D
0 g g
000
5i7 14 5(7
0 OP
0
g
g
4
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
142
0
0
g
g
g o
0 0
0 0
8 341
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 29
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
o g
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o g
o g
g g
0
0
g
4
g
g
0
0
0
0
g
20
g
g
g
g
99
-------
42-16 SINGLE STAGE LIME TREATMENT OF RAH MASTEUATER
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL HOW
PLANTS FLOH PIANT<
2 2
1 113
0 0
14 595
1 20
5
20
0
41
3}
354
0
1,120
UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REOUIIcn HUT
IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLON PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOM PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLOH
111 S ! 00 11 00 00
113 00 00 00 00 00
0 00 00 00 00 00
0 5 174 7 241 00 00 2 171
20 00 00 00 00 n A
5 33
20 354
0 0
28 523
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 174
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 249
000
000
000
1 1 0
o
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 171
42-37 SINGLE STAGE TERTIARY LIME TREATMENT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOH
1 4U 5 208 0 0
0
1
65
0
2
54
0
131
0
15
2,517
0
17
1,281
0
4,248
0
1
0
0
2
50
0
58
0
15
0
0
17
1,200
0
1,441
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
1,538
0
0
0
0
1.538
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED NOH IN
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
004
0
35
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
662
0
0
0
0
112
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
8
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FIOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
208 00 00
0
0
0
0
0
81
0
289
000
00 0
0 0 18
00 0
00 0
000
000
0 0 18
o
0
316
o
Q
0
0
316
42-38 RECARBONATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
UNDER
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
5
0
0
40
0
7
40
0
92
82
0
0
1,495
0
145
1,138
0
2,863
2
0
0
0
0
6
38
0
46
52
0
0
0
0
145
1,054
0
1,252
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 412
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 412
REQUIRED BUT
UNDER
NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
747
0
0
0
0
747
3 29
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 84
0 0
6 114
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
336
0
0
0
0
336
42-39 NEUTRALIZATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-40 ALUM ADDITION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1 22
0 0
1 3
15 194
0 0
2 3
14 190
0 0
33 413
TO PRIMARY
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOU
9 342
1 10
2 35
38 836
1 5
13 179
51 1,713
0 0
115 3,122
NOU
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
1
14
0
16
NOU
PLANTS
7
0
2
0
1
12
49
0
71
IN USt
FLCU
22
0
0
0
0
2
190
0
215
IN USE
FLOU
74
0
35
0
5
170
1,685
0
1,970
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
C 0
Cl 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 22
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 22
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 179
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 179
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
27 676
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
27 676
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
1 3
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 4
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
2 268
1 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 9
2 28
0 0
6 315
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 15
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 If
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 136
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 136
42-41 ALUM ADDITION TO SECONDARY
PROCESS
TOTAL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PLANTS
48
15
19
511
3
23
314
0
933
FLOH
1,635
269
766
5,966
27
150
6,162
0
14,998
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
25
11
14
0
3
23
289
0
365
FLOH
812
276
708
0
27
150
5.727
0
7,703
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
61
0
0
n
0
61
FLOH
0
0
0
1,142
0
0
0
0
1,142
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
230
0
0
0
0
230
FLOH
0
0
0
3,782
0
0
0
0
3,782
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
23
4
5
0
0
0
25
0
57
FLOH
822
13
57
0
0
0
434
0
1,328
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
220
0
0
0
0
220
FLOH
0
0
0
1,041
0
0
0
0
1,041
100
-------
42-42 ALUM ADDITION TO SEPARATE STAGE TERTIARY
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEK PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS
10
2
0
61
0
2
66
0
FLOH P
181
11
0
997
0
19
1,529
0
UNDER
NOH IN USE COHSTRUCTION
LANTS
5
2
0
0
0
1
62
0
FLOW
266
11
D
0
0
0
1,464
0
PLANTS
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
FLDH
0
0
0
127
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
FLOH 1
0
0
0
658
0
0
0
0
HOH IN
LANTS
5
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
114 000
0000
0000
0
0
18
65
0
0 20
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
FLOH
0
0
0
210
0
0
0
0
70 1.741
42-43 FERRI-CHLORIDE ADDITION TO PRIMARY
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PRO<
TO!
PLANTS
5
2
1
12
1
9
14
0
64
:ESS
r»L
FLOH
517
1B9
1,179
254
1
258
1,401
0
6,00}
NOH I
PLAHTS
2
2
1
0
1
a
31
D
47
N USE
FLOU
499
389
3.179
0
3
249
1,159
0
5,480
TYPE 1 ESTINATI
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 27
0 0
0 0
D 0
0 0
1 27
REQUIRE
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
D BUT
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
194
0
0
0
0
194
NOH IN
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
s
USE
FLOU
17
0
0
0
0
9
242
0
269
TYPE 2 ESTJHATI
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 -
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRE
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
D BUT
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
31
42-44 FERRI-CHLORIDE ADDITION TO SECONDARY
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
T01
PLANTS
9
6
5
76
0
10
146
0
252
r*L
FLOH
742
493
140
637
0
119
4,393
0
6,527
NOH I
PLANTS
5
6
5
0
0
8
142
0
166
N USE
FLOH
598
493
140
0
0
115
4,387
0
5,735
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
14
CTION
FLOH
0
0
0
76
0
0
0
0
76
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
D
45
0
0
0
0
45
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
504
0
0
0
0
504
NOH IN
PLANTS
4
0
0
0
0
2
4
0
10
use
FLOH
144
0
0
0
0
3
6
0
154
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
17
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
56
0
0
0
0
56
42-45 FERRI-CHLORIDE ADDITION TO SEPARATE STAGE TERTIARY
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TO!
PLANTS
3
0
2
15
1
0
27
0
r»L
FLOH
40
0
30
1,585
5
0
180
0
NOH I
PLANTS
2
0
2
0
1
0
23
0
N USE
FLOU
39
0
30
0
5
0
153
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 1,193
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 348
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOH IN
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
USE
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 D
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
42
0
0
0
0
42-46 OTHER CHEHICAL ADDITIONS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-47 ION EXCHANGE
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
8 255
2 456
4 48
35 1,236
1 700
12 66
64 2,253
0 0
129 7,017
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
2 56
0 0
0 0
1 40
0 0
0 0
1 56
0 0
6 153
NOH
PLANTS
4
1
2
0
1
11
60
0
79
NOH
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
IN USE
FLOH
92
454
30
0
700
63
1,674
0
3,015
IN USE
FLOH
0
0
0
0
3
0
56
0
56
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UHDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
Ci 0
0 0
0 0
13 2.581
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
11 2,583
TVPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
HOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
23
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
645
0
0
0
0
645
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
FLOU
0
0
0
35
0
0
0
0
35
NOH IH
PLANTS
4
1
2
0
0
1
4
0
12
NOH IN
PLANTS
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
USE
FLOH
162
2
18
0
0
1
579
0
765
USE
FLOH
56
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
56
TYPE 2 E51INATE
UNDER
COHSTRUCTIDN
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED
NOT FUN
PLANTS
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
BUT
DED
FLOH
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
7
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUHDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
2
FLOH
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
101
-------
42-48 BREAKPOINT CHLORINATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANCE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1 85
0 0
1 45
11 676
0 0
0 0
8 777
1 1,169
24 2,754
NOH
PLANTS
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
0
9
IN USE
FLCH
0
0
45
0
0
0
777
0
821
UHDER REQU
CONSTRUCTION NOT
PLANTS FLOH PLAN
0 0
0 0
I 0
2 116
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 116 1
RED BUT
FUNDED
rs FLOH
) 0
) 0
) 0
551
0
0
0
1.169
1,721
NOH IN
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
USE
FLOH
85
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
85
UNDER REQU
CONSTRUCTION NOT
PLANTS FLOH PIAN1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 i
0 0 3
RED BUT
FUNDED
S FIOH
f
0
6
42-49 AMONIA STRIPPING
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
HEM PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANUON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FIOH
0 0
0
0
2
0
0
7
0
0
0
2
0
0
3*5
0
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 D
0 0
0 0
D D
0 0
0 0
6 138
0 0
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 II
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOH IH
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
a
0
i
0
USE
FLOH
Q
0
0
0
0
0
56
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
42-50 DECHIORINATION
PROCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
TO!
PLANTS
31
2
2
234
2
7
160
0
438
AL
FLOH
(34
18
26
1,916
6
286
2,428
a
7,316
NON I
PLANTS
12
2
2
0
2
7
142
0
167
N USE
FLOH
246
18
26
0
6
286
2,340
0
2,924
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLAHTS
0
0
0
41
a
0
0
0
41
CTION
FLOH
0
0
0
443
0
0
0
0
443
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
0
0
106
0
0
0
0
106
INDEO
FIOH
0
0
0
2,741
0
0
0
0
2,941
NOH IN
"LANTS
19
0
0
0
0
D
18
0
37
USE
FLOH
387
0
0
0
0
0
87
0
475
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
CTION
FLOH
0
0
0
68
0
0
0
0
68
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
86
0
0
0
0
86
NDED
FIOH
0
0
0
462
0
0
0
0
462
42-51 CHLORIHATION FOR DISINFECTION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1,391 14,962
365 6,182
523 11,474
7,226 22,268
308 3.958
814 4.2T5
5.060 51,369
5 86
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
656 10,381
253 5,800
409 9.202
0 0
253 3,860
861 4.165
4,513 45,484
4 86
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
485
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
2,411
0
0
0
0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
1,598
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
16,046
0
0
0
0
NOH IN USE
PLAHTS
697
112
114
0
55
23
547
1
FLOU
4,579
382
2.271
0
97
49
5,885
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
5,141
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
3. BIS
0
0
0
0
15,724114,517 6,949 78,183
485 2,411 1,598 16,046 1,549 11,266
5,141 3,815
42-52 020HATION FOR DISINFECTION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLM1GE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL NOH
PLANTS FLOH PLANT'
1 15
0 0
0 0
24 1,058
0 0
0 0
27 1,691 2
0 0
56 2,768 2
UNDER
IN USE CONSTRUCTION
> FLOH PLANTS FLOH
800
000
000
0 8 199
000
000
1,674 0 0
) 0 00
I 1,682 8 199
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
13 525
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 525
NOH IN
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
USE
FLOH
7
0
0
0
0
0
IB
0
26
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
00 00
00 0
00 0
2 133 1
00 0
00 0
00 0
00 00
2 333 31
42-51 OTHER DISINFECTION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
48 361
1 0
1 2
7 4,698
0 0
57 5,06b
NOH IN USE
PLAHTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 2
6 4,640
0 0
8 4,641
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
LNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLAN1S FLOH
C 0
0 0
0 0
19 57
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
19 57
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
27 IDS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
27 105
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FIOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 58
0 0
1 58
UHDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
00 0
00 00
00 20
102
-------
42-54 LAND TREATMENT OF PRIMARY EFFLUENT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
4
D
2
53
0
56
14
0
z
0
2
48
0
65
20
0
1
0
1
0
0
25
11
0
1
0
2
0
0
48
11
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
14 12
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
00 31
00 00
00 10
32 34 00
00 00
0 0 31 16
00 38
00 00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 j
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
42-55 LAND TREATMENT OF SECONDARY EFFLUENT (10/10)
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-54 LAND TREATMENT OF
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
40 443
9 59
13 303
572 3,271
4 6
21 244
462 2,271
0 0
1,148 6,598
INTERMEDIATE
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
14 50
3 9
2 15
115 202
3 D
24 23
132 259
D 0
295 540
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOW
29 192
7 58
I
0
3
27
385
0
459
EFFLUENT
NOH IN
PLANTS
2
2
1
0
3
13
90
0
111
91
0
4
243
1,818
0
2,408
USE
FLOM
11
a
0
0
0
>4
202
0
238
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
C 0
a o
84 395
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
84 39!
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
24 41
0 0
0 0
0 0
f 0
2« 41
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 n
0
313
0
0
0
0
313
0
2,280
0
0
0
0
2.280
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOM
0 0
0
0
43
0
0
0
0
43
0
o
122
0
0
0
0
122
NOH IN
PLANTS
31
2
5
0
1
J
77
0
117
NOM IN
PLANTS
12
1
1
0
0
13
42
0
(9
USE
FLOM
251
j
211
0
1
o
453
0
918
USE
FLOH
38
0
1 5
0
0
8
54
0
119
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0
Q
Q
0
Q
0
0 o
0 0
0 0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 Q
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOM
0 0
Q
175
Q
A
g
0
175
u
595
g
0
Q
0
595
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 n
Q
Q
48
0
Q
0
0
48
"
J|
0
38
0
Q
0
0
38
42-57 STABILIZATION PONDS
FROCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
T01
PLANTS
780
538
388
3,349
238
935
2,482
20
PAL
FLOM
2,343
too
607
3,531
191
1,432
6,878
82
NOH I
PLANTS
261
292
256
0
129
762
2,138
17
N USE
FLOH
1,654
358
501
0
133
1,240
6,061
81
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
0
181
0
0
0
0
CTION
FLOW
0
0
0
264
0
0
0
0
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
0
0
692
0
0
0
0
JNDED
FLOH
0
0
0
2,389
0
0
0
0
NOM IN
PLANTS
519
256
132
0
109
173
344
3
USE
FLOH
709
242
104
0
57
191
818
1
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FU
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
000
000
000
0 0 2,476
000
000
000
000
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
877
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
8,730 15.688 3,845 10,030
692 2,389 1,536 2,127
42-58 AERATED LAGOONS
PROCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TO;
PLANTS
ISO
91
66
1,772
40
140
775
6
r«L
FLOH
488
548
485
1.854
ii
436
3. owe
27
*KI»*M*l>lt*ii*«*
NOH I
PLANTS
49
50
49
0
17
119
718
<
N USE
FLOH
196
256
302
0
44
344
2.913
27
ITrfc I bSllnAIC n«tt«»«M)l
-------
42-10 OUTFALL DIFFUSE*
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL NOW IN USE
PLANTS FLOM PLANTS FLOW
11 1.2*4 i7>
I It
2 I*
45 1,729
1 ail
2 12*
11
ta
0
an
32*
tl J. 214 SI 1,31}
15 0 g
TYPE I ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
D 0
7 154
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 5,571
0 0
0 0
0 D
0 0
NOM IN
PLANTS
I
1
1
0
0
0
7 1
1
USE
FLOH
415
7
I
0
0
o
.920
5
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLON PLANTS FLOH
0 A
o
Q
0
'
0
0
o
0
<7 5,214
42-11 EFFLUENT TO OTHER PLANTS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLAK'E AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-62 EFFLUENT OUTFALL
EKLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHA-IGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
2 17
0 0
0 0
21 154
0 0
t *
24 914
0 0
51 1,5*5
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1,111 15,908
14! 3,178
3*7 5,545
6,145 14,131
548 4,357
1,775 7,08t
9,515 (1,780
27 131
19,881142,119
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FIOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
21 an
0 0
27 821
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
ttl 11,721
205 3,00*
2*1 5,360
0 0
414 3,932
1,712 6,345
7,185 81,887
7 121
10.175112,178
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 62
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 62
TYPE 1 ESTIHATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
1, 0
0 0
0 0
111 3.065
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
333 3,065
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
D 0
0 0
0 0
17 5*1
0 0
Q A
0
0
17
0
0
5*1
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
1.100 7
0
0
0
0
1,100 7
0
0
,485
0
0
0
0
,485
NOH IN
PLANTS
2
0
0
0
0
Q
3
0
5
NOH IN
PLANTS
470 4
138
lot
0
114
tl
2,110 >
20
I, Oil 15
USE
FLOH
17
0
0
0
0
g
1D2
0
11*
USE
FLOH
,187
It*
185
0
424
741
.923
*
,641
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
TYPE 2 EaiinAi
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
1
0
g
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
g
0
0
1
0
u
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0.
0
0
4.70* 3
g
g
0
0
4,70* 3
0
0
,58t
g
g
0
0
.586
42-63 OTHER TREATMENT
PROCESS UNDER
TOTAL NON IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOH
ENLARGE it m 5 It* 00
UPGRADE 8 1,066 7 1,0(3 0 0
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE 7 26 5 23 00
NEH PROCESS 143 2,413 0 0 3i 48*
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
18
257
137
1
587
2*
114
3,842
2
7,683
12
5
123
1
248
8
»7
1.671
2
5,035
0
0
|j
0
33
0
0
0
0
48*
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
96 1,908
0
0
0
0
98
0
0
0
0
1,908
NOH IN
PLANTS
11
1
2
0
t
142
14
0
1*6
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FIOH
20 00 00
20000
30000
0 0 0 19 l£
21
17
171
0
236
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 14
42-64 RECALCINATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-65 AEROBIC DIGESTION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
5 475
1 22
0 0
12 230
0 0
3 76
17 1,37*
0 0
38 2,204
- AIR
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
517 5,376
123 1,022
168 953
2,110 8,73*
58 17*
372 1.199
2,0*0 12,113
1 4
5,461 27, to*
NOH
PLANT)
11
0
21
NOH
PLANTS
215
70
10*
0
44
354
1.902
3
2.697
IN USE
FLOH
212
22
Q
0
0
76
1.37*
0
1,711
IN USE
FIOH
2.272
877
as*
0
11*
1.165
11,690
4
17,011
TYPE I ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
4
0
2 45
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0
23 2.96
0 0
234 2.1ft
104
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
D 0
0 n
g
t
o
o
0
0
t
Q
1*7
Q
g
0
0
1*7
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 D
0 0
0 0
tlO 4,272
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
tlO 4
,272
NOH IN
PLANTS
3
g
n
0
g
g
0
0
3
NOH IN
PLANTS
322 1
51
5*
0
14
18
188
0
654 1
USE
FLOH
242
g
g
0
A.
g
0
0
242
USE
FLOH
,103
145
*1
0
40
11
443
0
.85*
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FIOH
0 0
0 A
0
0
g
Q
g
0
0
0
0
g
o
0
0
TYPE 2 tsiinAlfc
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
1
0
0
0 0
0 0
1
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0
g
0
4 7
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
1,265 1,50
0
0
0 0
0 0
1,265 1,502
-------
«2-«t AEIOIIC DIGESTION - DXVGEN
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLAIGE AND VPGIADE
MEN PROCESS
IEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
TOTAL NO.) IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOW IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOH PLANTS F^OM PUNTS fiw PLANTS Urn
711 4 27 00 00 34 on nn
1
1
It
1
8
53
0
0
s
424
0
41
430
0
1 0
1 5
0 0
0 0
* 41
50 398
0 0
000
000
7 It 11
000
000
000
000
0
0
158
0
0
0
0
000
00 0
ooo
100
00 0
S 31 0
000
0
g
0
0
n
0
0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
935
42-17 COMPOSTING
ENLAIGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGIADE
NEW PROCESS
EPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
TOTAL NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOM PLANTS FLOU
2 75 27!
2
2
IB
1
2
19
0
1,181
6(2
1,798
IB
2
2,033
0
2 1,181
2 662
0 0
1 18
2 2
11 427
0 0
HUH CO DCAI1 1 am BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
00 00 On n n
00 00
00 00
10 192 21 882
00 00
00 00
00 00
0000
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
o
o
0
0
o
1.406
0
00 0
0 0 0
00 5
000
0 0 0
00 0
ODD
g
Q
722
o
0
Q
0
66 5,771
22 2,369
1*2
882
4 1,606
42-68 ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEN PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
577 19.568
277 7,154
112 7,612
1.0*3 9,589
128 1,132
850 11,047
2,020 18,142
10 616
NOH
PLANTS
154
213
275
0
111
802
1.763
9
IN USE
FLOH
13,880
5,149
7,132
0
1,069
10,939
15,050
616
TYPE I ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
90 1,826
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
291 4.458
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOH IN
PLANTS
223
64
57
0
17
48
257
1
USE
FLOH
5,687
2,005
480
0
61
108
1,092
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
711 1,325
0 0
0 0
0 0
O 0
5,287 95,065 1,527 ?4,018
291 6,418
6(7 11,418
711 1,325
42-69 SLUDGE LAGOONS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
71 1,94]
10 748
19 1,655
156 2,5(7
12 170
10! 1,944
353 9,770
2 46!
NOH
PLANTS
37
23
12
0
11
93
312
2
IN USE
FlOW
1,'M
198
1,»». TYPE 1 ESTIMATE ............. ............. TVPE j ESTIMATE
UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
'cl'nu "NSTfUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOW
11 00 00 2 484 00 00
0 00 00 00 00 00
0 00 00 00 00 00
0 5 87 6 79 00 00 JO
10 00 00 00 On on
426
508
0
95S
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 87
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 79
1 3
2 75
a o
5 564
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
105
-------
42-72 LIME STABILIZATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
2
0
40
0
7
58
0
77
0
857
0
359
2.723
0
4.560
30
68
0
0
0
359
2,640
0
TYK 1 EST.MATE
0
0
0
240
0
0
0
0
240
0
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
591
0
0
0
0
TYPE t ESTIMATE
511
9
0
0
0
0
83
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
42-73 HET AIR OXIDATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHA.IGE
OTHER
TOTAL
2
2
0
6
33
0
488
147
335
0
248
1,758
0
1
2
0
0
6
31
0
397
0
0
248
1.693
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
297
0
0
0
0
113
90
0
0
0
0
64
0
42-74 AIR DRYING
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
'"CM. """""" T"E UN^'"4TE ;i"Ulii"D"l"U"' """»»' "« j ESTIMATE »»»».«..
PLANTS FLOH PL^S^FLoS """"""'ON NOT FUNDED NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION "2""
:"$","?!! Pl*582- ;?, PIAHI FLO; PLAN;S "°: n%?tf%i PLAT FIO:J PLAN:S rl°H
Si S::« i!Z !:!!! ! ! ! ':
's; i::i! i<° »: '» « .... ....
1,080 4,626 1,015 4,534 00 0 0 65 M - - ? ?
3.7C4 29,318 3,208 27,342 0000 496 1,977
" 63 4 63 00 00 00
9,589 58,923 5,380 44.256 214 1.145 680 3.825 1,352 7,175
u u U u
00 00
00 00
3 5 1*960 2,519
42-75 DEHATERING - MECHANICAL - VACUUM FILTER
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT
TOTAL NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
185 8,237 114 6,361 0000
50
67
475
11
107
753
1
6
4
11
6
28
,191
,662
,255
199
,513
,492
12
38
51
0
11
103
671
1
6,083 00 00
4.458 00 00
0 80 3,183 184 6,742
199 00 00
6,501 00 00
26,236 00 00
12 00 00
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOU
711*875 n n n n
12
16
0
o
4
82
0
108
204
0
Q
1 1
2.256
0
00 0
000
0 0 211
on
00 0
000
V
0
0
1,329
"
0
o
0
1,649 65.565
989 49.853
184 6,742
185 4,456
211 1,329
42-76 DEUATERING - MECHANICAL - CENTRIFUGE
ENLARGE
UPGRADt
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL NOU IN USE
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOW
*7 4,581 25 1.261
11
IS
71
3
15
153
0
557
896
11.211
593
7,582
0
10
11
0
3
15
139
0
466
724
0
58
593
7,405
0
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
17 624
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
46
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,592
0
0
0
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
22 3,120 00 n n
1 90
2 171
0 0
0 0
0 0
14 176
0 0
0
0
0
g
o
0
0
o
Q
0
Q
Q
0
0
0 0
0 0
8 1,994
0 0
0 0
0 0
203 10,509
42-77 DEMATERING - MECHANICAL - FILTER PRESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL NOU IN USE
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOU
27 883 17 483
2
10
180
1
7
104
332
8
514
11,475
132
170
3,898
97
17,181
2
10
0
1
7
96
1
134
8
514
0
132
170
3,523
97
4,150
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
r
43
0
0
0
0
43
106
0
0
4,026
0
0
0
0
4,021
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0
0
125
0
0
0
0
125
0
0
7,296
0
0
0
0
7,296
UNDER
NON IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU PLANTS FLOH
10 399 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 374
0 0
IB 774
0
Q
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
o
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
Q
12
0
Q
0
0
12
o
Q
153
0
Q
0
0
153
-------
42-78 DEHATERINC - OTHERS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEM PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANSt
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
3 85
4 57
1 1,2«0
It 1,580
2 8
7 24
20 419
0 0
NOH
PLANTS
2
4
1
0
2
5
19
0
IN USE
FLOH
85
57
1.2(0
0
8
8
489
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLON
0000
0
0
> 1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1,470
0
0
0
0
NOH IN
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
8
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
It 8
10 0
0 0
8
0
8 »
0
8
8
8008
71 1,437
33 1,82*
25 1.470
42-79 GRAVITY THICKENING
ENLARGE
UPGDADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLON
140 10,230
27 1,981
35 2,780
398 10,203
11 271
62 4,913
509 24,954
1 75
1,183 55,411
NOH
PLANTS
85
21
28
0
10
to
4i4
1
(69
IN USE
FLOH
9,114
1,857
2,629
0
271
4,904
2), 972
75
42,875
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 8
0 0
75 2,951
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
75 2,951
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLON
21
8
0
0
5,580
0
0
8
0
210 5,580
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN
PLANTS
55
t
7
0
1
2
45
8
lit
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT Fl
FLOH PLANTS FLON PLANTS
l.Ott
123
150
8
0
9
982
0 0
0
8
8
113
8
0
8
8
2,332 8 8 111
NDED
FLOH
1,67
1,472
42-80 AIR FLOTATION THICKENING
PROCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
TO
PLANTS
39
8
5
149
3
6
160
0
370
TAL
FLOH
3,211
859
770
11,803
148
1,413
9,203
0
27,410
NOH
PLANTS
24
7
4
0
3
t
144
0
188
N USE
FLOH
2,189
S.U
7S5
0
14C
1,413
8,343
0
13, tfl3
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONST*
PLANTS
0
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
40
JCTION
FLOH
8
0
0
2,597
0
8
0
0
2,597
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
0
0
101
0
0
0
0
101
(NDED
FLOH
0
8
0
7,9t2
0
8
8
a
7,962
NOH II
PLANTS
15
1
1
0
8
0
It
0
33
1 USE
FLOH
1,022
25
15
0
0
0
860
8
1,923
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
0
8
CTION
FLOH
8
8
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOT F
PLANTS
0
0
8
8
8
0
0
8
a
JNDED
FLOH
1
1,24
1
1,243
42-81 INCINERATION - MULTIPLE HEARTH
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PRO
TO
PLANTS
42
22
18
77
7
34
178
1
CESS
TAL
FLOH
4,028
4,818
3,093
8.173
913
1,405
13,111
1 , 169
NON ]
PLANTS
27
17
14
0
5
31
165
0
IN USE
FLOH
3.129
4,757
2,933
0
895
l,24i
12,344
8
TYPE 1 I
UNI
CONSTRl
PLANTS
0
0
8
12
0
0
0
8
ISTIHATI
IER
ICTION
FLOH
8
0
0
1,072
0
0
0
0
REQUIRI
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
0
0
43
0
0
0
1
:D BUT
INDED
FLOH
0
0
8
5,119
8
8
8
1,149
NOH IN
PLANTS
15
t
4
0
2
3
IS
8
USE
FLOH
899
tl
159
8
18
158
7t4
8
TYPE Z E
UND
CONSTRU
PLANTS
8
8
8
2
8
8
8
8
STINATI
ER
CTION
FLON
8
8
0
357
0
0
0
0
REQUIRI
NOT Fl
PLANTS
0
0
8
20
0
0
8
8
:D BUT
INDED
FLON
8
8
8
1,423
8
8
8
8
379 34,71',
257 25,308
42-82 INCINERATION - FLUIDIZED BEDS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1 17
2 181
0 0
4 1,119
1 14
0 0
18 1,125
8 0
NOH
PLANTS
1
2
0
0
1
0
17
0
IN USE
FLOH
17
181
0
0
14
0
1,101
0
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 22
0 0
0 0
0 8
8 8
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 832
0 0
0 0
0 0
o a
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
0
0
8
0
8
0
808
1 23 8
808
8
8
8
264
0
8
0
8
42-83 INCINERATION - ROTARY KILN
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEN PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1 90
0 0
1 105
2 1.170
0 0
2 12
4 34i
0 0
10 1,725
NOH IN UEE
PLANTS FLON
8 D
0 0
1 105
0 0
0 0
2 12
4 145
0 0
7 464
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOH IN
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
1,170
8
0 0
0 0
08080
90 8 0 2 1,170
107
-------
42-84 INCINERATION - OTHERS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1 104
0 0
0 0
4 S98
0 0
0 0
14 997
0 0
19 1,700
NOH
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
14
UNDER
IN USE CONS', RUCTION
HQH PLANTS FIOH
104 0
0
0
0
0
0
972
0
0
314
0
0
0
000
1,077 3 314
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 283
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 283
NOH IN
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
UNDER
USE CONSTRUCTION
FLOH PLANTS FLOH
n
24
o
g
g
g
Q
D
000
24 0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
Of.
0
0 0
Q 0
On
D
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
42-85 PVROLYSIS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEN PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLON
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 89
0 0
0 0
: »7
0 0
7 181
NON
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
IN USE
FION
0
0
0
0
0
0
97
0
»7
UNDER IE4UIIED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLON
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
00 3 64
NON IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
D 0
TYPE 2 ESTINATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 24
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 24
42-86 CO-INCINERATION NITH SOLID HASTE
PROCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
.. .ur?1*^- NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
,,.... PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS fLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLON
ENLARGE 00 00 00 00 00 00 on
UPSIiADE 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 S
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
NEH PROCESS 8 483 00 . 3,2 4 91 1 I 11 11
"EPLACE 00 00 00 00 on oo "
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
1
6
0
15
1
238
0
724
1 1
6 238
0 0
7 240
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
392
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 91
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 0
000
000
000
g
0
0
0
42-87 CO-PYROLYSIS HITH SOLID HASTE
ENLARGE
UPGRADt
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL NOH IN
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
1 " ~
0
0
1
0
2
9
0
13
i
0
0
171
0
31
306
0
511
u
0
0
0
0
2
9
0
11
UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLON PLANTS FION
b
0
0
0
0
31
306
0
338
D 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
r o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
0
o
1
o
o
0
0
1
Q
o
o
171
g
g
0
0
171
42-88 CO-INCINERATION - OTHERS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
"OCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
, ,I°TAl NOH >H USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLON PLANTS FLON
D
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
D
0
11
37
0
0
9
0
000
000
1 11 0
000
000
000
1 9 0
000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
000
000
000
37 0 0
000
000
0
o
0
D
0
0
0 00 00
00000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
42-89 LAND FILL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
672 10,964
65 2.337
129 8.965
3,084 14,747
91 335
1,038 6,068
5,462 59,853
1 700
10,542103,973
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NON IN USE
PLANTS
366
47
95
0
60
996
4,384
1
5,949
FLOU
8,101
2,270
7,357
0
276
5,739
52,527
700
76,973
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
245
0
0
0
0
245
FLOH
0
0
0
3,360
0
0
0
0
3,360
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
801
0
0
0
0
801
FLOH
0
0
0
7,610
0
0
0
0
7,610
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
306
18
34
0
31
42
1,078
0
1.509
FLOH
2,863
67
1,608
0
58
329
7.327
0
12.253
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
FLOH
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
g
0
0
2,036
0
0
0
0
2,036
FLOH
g
0
0
3,779
0
0
0
0
3,779
108
-------
42-90 LAND SPREADING OF LIQUID SLUDGE
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
""CESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT
TOTAL NOW IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOW
55 558 26 241 0 D 00
14 73 11 6& n n n *
29
392
10
156
833
1
4,815
1,507
68
»39
5.236
18
2!
0
9
148
717
1
4,798
0
87
869
4,960
18
00 0
47 274 151
00 0
00 0
000
000
u
1,099
Q
0
0
UNDER
NOW IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOU
29 116 0 0
57 ~
6 16
0 0
1 0
0 70
116 276
0 0
D 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOW
0 0
0 0
0 0
194 134
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,490 13,037
935 11,042
151 1,099
42-91 LAND SPREADING OF THICKENED SLUDGE
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEI4 PROCESS
PEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-92 TRENCHING
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
94 1,529
24 892
61 6,379
339 5,402
10 113
162 2,712
1,014 11,341
4 480
1.7C6
28,853
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
1 i
0
0
J
o
1
6
0
11
0
0
7
0
1,169
73
0
1,251
UNDER
NDH IK USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
69 830 0 0
17 851 0 0
54 6,371 0 0
0 0 69 1,673
10 113 0 0
155 2,694 0 0
(71 10,591 0 0
3 471 0 0
1,179 21,925 69
1,673
FCTTMATC
UNDER
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOW PLANTS FLOW
11 0 ~
00 0
00 0
1 1,169 0
5 22 0
000
7 1,193 1
U
0
"
7
0
0
0
0
7
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
174 3,555
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
174 3
.555
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
25 698
7 40
7 7
0 0
0 0
7 17
143 750
1 9
190
NOW IN
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1,525
USE
FLOW
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
50
' TVPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
TVPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
96 173
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
96 173
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
42-93 OCEAN DUMPING
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDO'1
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PRI
Tl
INT!
3
0
0
8
0
40
6
0
DCESS
DTAL
5 FLOH P
126
0
0
147
0
11,059
71
0
LANTS
0
0
0
0
32
4
0
0
0
0
0
Q
9,166
28
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANVS FLOH PLANTS FLOH 1
00 00
000
003
000
000
000
000
92
0
0
0
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
3 126 00 00
0 0
0 0
8 1,893
2 42
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 54
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
57 11,405
13 2,062
42-94 OTHER SLUDGE HANDLING
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND
NE- PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL NOU IN USE
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
21 461 10 305
9 760 4 657
UPGRADE 5 3,595 4 3,593
292 12,397 0 0
3 11 * it
68 1,709
203 5,486
2 1,47<
603 25,899
61 1,686
181 4,915
1 18
264 11,188
42-95 DIGEST GAS UTILIZATION FACILITIES
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
24 3.261 14 955
-------
42-96 CONTROL/LAB.MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FIDH
(07 12,636
436 8,592
645 14,017
5,163 13,679
21B 1,980
632 3,491
5,919 47,143
1 12
NOW
PLANTS
303
304
499
0
172
616
4. 855
1
IN USE
FLOW
(,246
&<» 145
12,099
0
1,925
3,438
59,170
12
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
375 2,193
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOW
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,255 8,213
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOH IN
PLANTS
304 4
132
146 1
0
46
16
1,064 7
0
USE CONS
FLOH PLAN
,390
446
,918
0
55
53
,278
0 (
2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
TRUCTION
rs FLOH
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
4.211 1,27
0
0
0
0
6,750 93,737
37!, 2,193 1,255 8,213
1,708 14,143
4.2J1 J.J77
42-97 'ULLY AUTOMATED USING DIGITAL CONTROL
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE A-'D UPGRADE
NEU PROCES^
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-98 FULLY AUTOMATED
ENLAPGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOU
9 1,716
1 189
3 314
24 3,493
0 0
1 0
28 3,942
2 711
NOH :
1
2
0
0
1
1
36
IN USE
FLOH
189
181
0
0
0
2,326
170
3,945
USING ANALOG CONTROLS
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
i 1,12,
6 680
5 86
13 1,385
6 17,
3 3,
51 4,03£
1 181
,3 7,720
NOU IN USE
PLANTS FLOU
2 1,022
7 580
5 86
0 0
6 179
3 39
46 3,608
1 181
70
5,7,6
i TYPE 1 ESTIMATI
UNDER
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 2,662
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 2,662
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 20
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 20
REQUIRED BUT
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
,
FLOU
0
0
0
7,8
0
0
0
0
7,8
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
, 1.342
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 "
, 1
u
.312
PLANTS
3
0
1
0
o
0
3
8
NOU IN
PLANTS
4
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
10
FLOH
63,
0
132
0
0
1.616
541
2,929
USE
FLOH
107
0
0
0
0
0
vn
a
537
' TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Q
0 0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRE!
NOT FUN
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
8
IDED
0
0
0
33
0
0
0
33
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOW
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 22
0 0
0 0
0 n
0
3
0
22
42-99 SEMI AUTOMATED PLANT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
853 7,991
1,066 17,900
1,026 15,424
4,731 12,577
523 1,821
1,07) 6,368
6,064 61,806
24 748
NOU
PLANTS
333
668
717
0
366
1,047
5,306
19
IN USE
FLOU
5,409
16,844
11,467
0
1,680
6,309
55,433
655
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
346 1,992
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,065 7,634
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOU IN
PLANTS
520
398
309
0
157
26
758
5
USE
FLOH
2,582
1,057
958
0
140
59
6,373
93
TYPE 2 ESTIM
UNDER
CONSTRUCTIO
PLANTS FLO
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
^ NOT FUNDED
4 PLANTS FLOH
> 0 0
0 0
0 0
1.318 2,»S3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
15,360124,640 8,456130.800
346 1,992 1,065 7,634 2,173 11,265
3,118 2,953
42-A1 MANUALLY OPERTED AND CONTROLLED PLANT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLAC1"
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
2,5 1,276
343 612
307 655
2,975 2,527
187 260
685 1,510
2,7,3 5,3,1
12 103
NOU
PLANTS
93
134
211
0
105
575
2,20,
11
IN USE
FLOU
841
478
555
0
208
1,318
4,325
103
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOU
0 0
0 0
0 0
12, 145
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
555 1,550
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOU IN
PLANTS
202
20,
96
0
82
110
584 1
1
USE
FLOH
435
134
100
0
52
1,2
,066
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
2,291 830
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL
7,5,7 12.338 3,338 7,830
555 1,550 1,284 1,981
42-A2 PACKAGE PLANT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOU
136 103
78 ' "
105
1,110
Jl
3,2
,31
1
2,784
147
758
2 t
535
1,016
2,645
NOU IN USE
PLANTS FLCH
34 42
38 * '
57
0
2 3
361
81,
1
1,333
t*
111
0
18
504
,60
0
1,683
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
74
I
0
0
c
74
0
0
61
0
0
0
0
61
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
203
0
0
0
0
203
0
0
172
0
0
0
0
172
UNDER
NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOU
102 61 0 0
40
48
0
8
31
112
0
341
13
35
0
3
31
56
0
203
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
832
0
0
0
0
832
0
0
524
0
0
0
0
524
110
-------
42-A1 SEMI-PACKAGE PLANT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
42-A4 CUSTOM BUILT PLANT
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
JIB 507
111 3«2
149 44(
919 1,484
80 212
215 717
1,086 1.91B
4 1*
2,122 7, (81
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
917 11,038
,264 K.194
,411 26,118
,475 13,433
413 1,987
,092 4,480
,451 41,202
37 1,801
NOW IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
48 204
72 222
95 3(2
0 0
41 >2
203 (90
948 3,554
3 1]
1.430 5,140
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
407 7,907
(89 15,040
1,01' 24,405
0 0
42( 1,845
1,018 4,173
5,551 55,448
31 1,164
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0
0
4 118
0
0
0
0 0
49 118
TYPE 1 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
318 1,870
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
205
0
0
0
0
205
FLOH
0
0
0
891
0
0
0
0
891
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
1,195 8
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
.806
0
0
0
0
NOH IN
PLANTS
150
59
54
0
39
12
138
1
453
NOH IN
PLANTS
530
575
397
0
187
74
902
(
use
FLOH
302
1(0
81
0
119
26
3(4
0
1,058
use
FLOH
3,131
1.155
1,712
0
142
107
8,513
(34
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
FLOH
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
TYPE 2 es i in* I c
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
462
0
0
0
0
442
FLOH
0
0
0
472
0
0
0
0
472
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
3,9(2 2
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
0
.7(3
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
17,282139,257 9,11(110,408
318 1,870 1,195 8,804 2,(71 15,417
3.9(2 2.7(3
42-A5 IMHOFF TANKS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEU PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS
10
26
4
10
7
2(1
110
3
433
FLOH
5
21
2
(
3
255
115
2
413
NOU IN USE
PLANTS
4
22
3
0
5
137
(7
3
241
FLOH
1
20
1
0
2
119
81
2
231
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
000
000
000
4 1 (
000
1! 0 0
000
000
4 1 4
FLOH
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
NOH IN
PLANTS
t
4
1
0
2
126
43
0
182
USE
FLOH
3
0
1
0
1
135
32
0
175
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42-A( SEPTIC TANKS
PkOCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
TOT
PLANTS
0
75
3
130
7
52
41
0
108
AL
FLOH
0
5
0
45
0
11
9
0
71
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
(0 4
1 0
0 0
( 0
17 10
56 8
0 0
120 2!
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
16 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
16 2
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
72
0
0
0
0
72
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
20
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
15 0
2 0
0 0
1 0
15 1
5 0
0 0
58 4
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
Q
42
0
g
0
0
42
NDED
FLOH
Q
o
Q
23
o
g
0
0
21
42-A7 ELECTRODIALYSIS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH I
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N USE
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CTION
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NDED
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42-AB REVERSE OSMOSIS
PROCESS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
TOT
PLANTS
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
AL NOH IN USE
FLOH PLANTS FLOH
000
000
000
54 0 0
000
000
000
000
56 0 0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRU
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CTION
FLOH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 56
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 56
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o o
0 0
o o
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NOT FU
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
NOEO
FLOH
0
0
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
111
-------
42-A» PRESSURE FILTERS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
"OCESS UNDER REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
TOTAL NOU IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLON PLANT* FIOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FIOH
00 0
000
000
2 15 0
000
1 5 1
2 12 1
000
II 0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0 0
0 (
o
o
o
o
o
0
42-AA SEEPAGE lAGOONS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS
15)
1}
a
542
M
45
515
1
FLOH
20*
20
10
428
9
56
657
0
NOH IN USE
PLANTS
20
6
5
0
5
10
562
1
FLOH
111
7
10
0
2
11
til
0
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS
0
0
0
42
0
0
0
0
FLOW
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
NOT FUNDED
PLANTS
0
0
0
122
0
0
0
0
FLOH
0
0
A
101
0
0
0
0
NOH IN
PLANTS
lit
7
9
0
14
IS
21
0
USE
FIOH
75
11
D
0
<
24
44
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE »«««««
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FION
0
0
0
296
0
0
0
0
1,172 1,391
16S
171
2»6
42-AB ROCK FILTERS
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
HEW PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS
0
0
0
10
0
1
1
0
14
FLOH P
0
0
0
12
0
22
2
0
37
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
LANTS FLOH
D I!
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 22
1 2
0 0
4 25
'LANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U 0
'LANTS
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
7
FIOH
0
0
0
12
0
0
D
0
12
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
'LANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
FLOH PLANTS FLOH
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
000
000
000
010
42-AC POLYMER ADDITION TO LIQUID STREAM
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEN PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
TOTAL
PLANTS FLCH
1 1
0 0
1 1,179
84 633
1 14
4 362
32 1,185
0 0
NOH IN USE
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
1 1,179
0 t
1 14
2 357
29 H8<
0 0
TYPE I ESTIMATE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 25
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT UNDER REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOH
00 13 00 00
0 0 P » " " !
0 0
18 506
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
M
0
M
*
0
V If
0 0
40 101
0 0
0 0
w v
000
123 5,379
101
42-AD POLYMER ADDITION TO SLUJ3E STREAM
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
NEH PROCESS
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTAL
PROCESS
UNDER
TOTAL NOH IN USE CONSTRUCTION
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FtOH PLANTS FLOH
5
0
1
68
0
1
27
0
146
0
1
2,171
0
0
1,»4B
0
1 104
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
25 1.C64
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 128
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
REQUIRED BUT
NOT FUNDED NOH IN
PLANTS FLOH PLANTS
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
1,641
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
Q
2
0
USE
FLOH
42
0
Q
o
o
Q
83
0
TYPE 2 ESTIMATE ....
UNDER REQUIRED BUT
CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PLANTS FIOH PLANTS FLON
122 4,270
28 1,973
14 1,641
0
0
0
398
0
0
0
0
39»
112
-------
TABLE 43
DISTRIBUTION OF LIQUID LINE TREATMENT PROCESSES
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(EXISTING)
Table 43 summarizes the common groupings of liquid line treatment processes
used in existing treatment plants.
Information is provided for each EPA Region with a national total at the
bottom of the table. The Regions are subdivided into five flow ranges,
based on present design capacity, so that the size of the plant, as well as
the geographical location, can be related to the different processes.
The All Plants column gives the total number of each Region's plants that
fall within the various flow ranges and the total present flow capacity
represented by these plants.
The subsequent columns show which liquid line treatment processes are in
use, listing the number of plants and the associated flow. The processes
are grouped into general categories such as lagoons or trickling filters
which may cover several related processes. For example, lagoons could be
stabilization ponds, aerated lagoons, or seepage lagoons.
A single plant may have an entry in more than one category; therefore, the
sum of the categories may exceed the total listed under All Plants. Entries
are made in the Other column only if a plant does not qualify for any of the
process categories. The Other column includes conventional primary
treatment plants, Imhoff tanks, physical/chemical treatment plants, and
other miscellaneous treatment facilities.
All flows are reported in million gallons per day.
113
-------
DECEHBE* 31.
TABLE 43
1>B2
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
DISTRIBUTION OF LIQUID LINE TREATMENT PROCESSES
BV DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(EXISTING)
EPA
REGION
I
FLOW RANGE
(HUD)
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION I
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION II
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION III
0.00- 0.10
0.11- O.SO
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION IV
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
RfcGION V
0.00- 0. 10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VI
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VIII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION IX
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION X
0.00- 0.10
D.ll- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
ALL REGIONS
ALL PLANTS
t OF
PLANTS
62
131
69
172
45
479
78
234
110
244
62
728
254
459
152
276
49
1.190
575
916
299
540
76
2,406
970
1.277
342
516
128
3,233
842
955
289
398
48
2,532
1,246
681
129
162
25
2,243
691
294
68
114
15
1.182
198
239
92
206
65
800
184
226
71
135
22
638
5,100
5,412
1,621
2.763
535
15.431
TOTAL
FLOM
3.4
37.4
52.3
549.5
1470.8
2113.2
4.6
69.2
84.3
842.8
3494.0
4494.7
13.8
127.1
115.9
910.0
2377.3
3544.0
26.8
250.9
236.0
1890.7
2317.4
4721.6
57.8
316.2
253.7
1568.4
6826.8
9022.7
43.7
251.8
226.7
1190.1
1504.0
3216.1
60.8
161.1
96.9
486.8
1064.6
1869.9
28.7
69.8
53.0
371.7
481.3
1004.3
10.3
67.7
71.6
727.0
3166.6
4043.0
10.5
59.3
55.1
441.4
672.6
1238.7
259.9
1410.0
1245.0
8978.1
23375.1
35267.8
LAGOONS
« Of
PLANTS
18
32
12
13
0
75
11
26
6
22
3
68
59
74
14
13
3
163
246
442
104
117
7
916
570
552
92
66
10
1,290
533
466
98
104
8
1.209
991
369
50
32
3
1,445
644
263
47
42
2
998
159
187
63
107
14
530
140
106
30
38
2
316
3,371
2,517
516
554
52
7.010
LAND
TREATHENT
TOTAL * OF TOTAL
FLOW PLANTS FLOM
1.1
8.0
8.1
38.1
0.0
55.1
0.6
8.3
5.1
66.6
325.0
405.5
3.3
18.2
9.6
36.7
135.0
202.6
15.2
111.4
76.7
357.1
133.6
693.8
33.9
123.4
67.2
154.9
198.0
577.2
28.4
110.1
74.4
276.8
146.1
635.7
45.2
79.0
36.6
69.5
125.0
355.1
26.1
62.5
35.5
120.8
25.7
270.5
8.3
51.8
47.7
385.5
378.9
872.1
8.0
25.8
22.6
100.8
71.0
228.1
169.7
598.1
383.2
1606.2
1538.3
4295.2
3
1
2
0
0
6
0
2
0
2
0
4
3
4
1
3
0
11
8
7
8
12
1
36
30
40
10
6
1
87
144
108
18
32
2
304
7
10
2
0
0
19
a
12
1
3
1
25
43
88
34
it
9
240
32
20
7
14
1
74
278
292
83
138
15
806
0.3
0.2
1.2
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.6
0.0
15.5
0.0
16.1
0.2
1.0
0.6
10.4
0.0
12.!
0.5
1.6
7.0
43.9
15.0
67.9
1.9
f.t
7.6
8.4
42.0
68.3
7.1
26.0
13.2
73.5
34.4
154.1
0.5
3.2
1.4
0.0
0.0
4.9
0.4
2.2
0.8
14.1
11.2
28.5
1.9
25.1
26.1
232.3
237.1
522.2
1.9
5.1
5.6
46.5
18.3
77.3
14.3
73.1
63.1
444.4
358.0
952.6
ACTIVATED
SLUDGE
OXIDATION
DITCH
* OF TOTAL t OF TOTAL
PLANTS FLOM PLANTS FLOH
22 1.3
72 22.0
36 27.9
114 379.4
35 1139.2
279 1569.7
48 2.8
108 32.2
61 47.5
121 475.2
46 2494.1
384 3051.6
145 7.8
261 72.2
94 72.7
IBS 636.1
40 1997.5
725 2786.2
142 8.0
358 103.7
146 120.6
345 1281.3
68 2180.7
1,059 3694.2
298 17.2
459 124.1
177 136.2
361 1155.1
110 6389.1
1,405 7821.5
252 10.8
293 85.9
114 91.3
186 595.2
36 1296.7
881 2079.8
131 7.0
81 23.1
38 29.2
45 179.5
12 390.4
307 628.9
37 1.9
25 6.6
12 8.9
44 132.6
8 315.5
126 465.3
55 Z.I
69 20.0
27 21.8
107 425.6
43 2086.6
301 2556.8
34 2.1
68 20.6
21 16.9
60 189.3
14 382.5
197 611.2
1,164 61.4
1,794 509.9
726 572.5
1,568 5449.1
412 18672
5,664 25265
6
9
4
0
0
19
0
1
2
0
0
3
3
8
0
0
0
11
6
29
3
11
0
49
11
49
7
5
2
74
76
143
53
40
3>i
15
44
13
10
0
82
5
7
6
5
0
23
25
2
20
5
5
0
32
124
319
102
82
4
631
0.4
2.1
2.5
0.0
0.0
4.9
0.0
0.2
1.6
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.3
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
0.6
9.3
2.3
31.8
0.0
43.8
0.8
12.4
4.8
9.5
27.5
54.9
5.2
38.8
39.3
100.1
10.1
193.4
1.2
12.8
9.2
15.6
O.C
38.7
0.3
2.0
4.6
15.4
0.0
22.2
0.0
3.1
7.5
12.0
13.3
35.8
0.2
4.8
3.9
10.5
0.0
19.3
8.7
87.6
75.5
194.6
50.9
417.0
TRICKLING
FILTER
1 OF
PLANTS
3
9
e
2t
4
50
a
72
30
82
4
196
20
68
31
78
6
203
8
125
86
191
16
426
88
290
114
120
23
635
25
120
64
138
363
121
207
48
84
11
471
10
15
10
44
7
86
e
24
20
50
16
118
3
35
19
30
4
91
294
965
430
843
107
2,639
RBC
OTHER
TOTAL * OF TOTAL t OF TOTAL
FLOH PLANTS FLOH PLANTS FLOM
0.1
2.4
5.7
83.5
52.6
144.2
0.7
21.6
22.2
236.0
58.0
338.3
1.5
21.5
25.3
252.9
336.0
637.0
0.7
39.9
70.3
690.8
283.3
1084.8
6.3
77,5
84.0
346.0
765.2
1278.7
1.8
37.1
54.4
426.8
503.6
1023.6
8.7
51.7
37.3
256.7
277.6
631.8
0.7
3.7
9.2
191.6
177.1
382.3
0.6
7.3
15.3
173.6
444.4
641.0
0.3
9.6
14.8
116.6
84.1
225.2
20.9
271.9
338.1
2774.1
2981.8
6386.6
1
1
1
3
0
6
0
9
1
5
1
16
0
4
6
11
1
22
1
3
2
10
2
18
5
34
22
43
4
108
0
2
2
4
1
9
2
23
4
14
0
43
I
1
2
6
0
10
1
1
0
4
2
8
2
5
2
8
0
17
13
83
42
108
11
257
0.1
0.5
0.7
7.0
0.0
8.2
0.0
2.8
1.0
20.3
16.0
40.0
0.0
1.3
5.4
34.1
54.0
94.7
0.1
0.7
1.4
38.5
36.0
76.7
0.4
11.0
15.1
120.3
83.7
230.4
0.0
0.7
1.5
21.4
12.0
35.6
0.2
7.0
2.9
37.5
0.0
47.4
0.1
0.3
1.2
21.3
0.0
22.7
0.1
0.4
0.0
13.7
34.8
49.0
0.2
1.3
1.7
14.2
0.0
17.3
0.9
25.7
0.7
327.9
236.5
621.5
12 0.6
13 3.6
9 8.1
26 A3. 9
8 309.0
68 405.1
16 0.9
40 11.1
16 12.1
36 111.3
12 728.0
120 863.2
31 1.5
59 17.1
16 10.9
21 71.4
5 230.3
132 331.1
190 3.9
27 6.6
3 2.4
11 32.1
1 18.0
232 62.8
50 3.0
61 15.3
12 9.8
26 84.3
4 130.4
153 242.7
8 0.3
14 4.0
1 0.8
2 5.9
2 32.0
27 42.9
13 0.5
7 1.6
1 0.8
3 7.4
6 486.0
30 496.1
12 0.6
2 0.4
2 1.9
2 5.1
0 0.0
18 7.9
12 0.5
6 1.9
1 1.0
14 41.1
11 788.6
44 833.0
9 0.3
6 1.9
4 3.2
16 70.9
3 170.0
38 246.3
353 11.7
235 63.1
65 50.6
157 513.2
52 2892.3
862 3530.6
114
-------
TABLE 44
DISTRIBUTION OF LIQUID LINE TREATMENT PROCESSES
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(YEAR 2000)
Table 44 summarizes the common groupings of liquid line treatment processes
expected to be used in treatment plants operating in the year 2000.
Information is provided for each EPA Region with a national total at the
bottom of the table. The Regions are subdivided into five flow ranges,
based on projected design capacity, so that the size of the plant, as well
as the geographical location, can be related to the different processes.
The All Plants column gives the total number of each Region's plants that
are projected to fall within the various flow ranges and the total projected
design capacity represented by these plants.
The subsequent columns show which liquid line treatment processes the plants
are projected to use, listing the number of plants and the associated flow.
The processes are grouped into general categories such as lagoons or
trickling filters which may cover several related processes. For example,
lagoons could be stabilization ponds, aerated lagoons, or seepage lagoons.
A single plant may have an entry in more than one category; therefore, the
sum of the categories may exceed the total listed under All Plants. Entries
are made in the Other column only if a plant does not qualify for any of the
process categories. The Other column includes conventional primary
treatment plants, Imhoff tanks, physical/chemical treatment plants, and
other miscellaneous treatment facilities.
All flows are reported in million gallons per day.
115
-------
1!82 NEEDS SURVEY
DISTRIBUTION OF LIQUID LINE TREATMENT PROCESSES
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
CYI-AR 2000)
DECEMBER 31,
TABLE 44
1982
EPA
REGION
t
FLOW RANGE
(MGD)
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION I
0.00- 0.10
0. 11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.0) »
REGIOi II
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION III
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION IV
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10. 01" +
REGION V
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VI
0.00- 0 10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VII.
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VIII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION IX
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
0.01 *
REGION X
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
ALL REGIONS
ALL PLANTS
OF
PLANTS
167
208
71
210
50
726
267
324
118
261
82
1,054
803
896
23?
351
62
2,351
1,077
1,014
308
655
126
3.180
1,418
1,369
351
586
140
3,864
1.797
1,198
356
475
47
3,893
1,445
687
143
186
32
2,493
771
338
69
137
19
1,334
421
171
127
245
69
1,233
344
298
78
152
27
99
8,530
6,703
1.860
1.260
674
21,027
TOTAL
FLOW
10.2
55.1
50.5
691.6
1678.7
2486.0
14.4
81.1
89.6
960.2
4344.7
5489.8
44.0
228.7
176.4
1056.1
2869.0
4373.9
51.2
248.0
229.0
2277.8
3967.2
6773.1
79.1
333.8
256.4
1822.2
7702.6
10193.9
84.7
289.7
265.6
1441.7
2140.7
4222.2
65.
160.
102.
561.
1139.
2029.
31.0
76.8
49.7
411.2
664.0
1232.5
22.4
90.5
94.8
859.8
3323.4
4390.7
17.9
74.8
58.4
508.3
887.0
1546.1
420.1
1638.8
1372.3
10589.9
28716.6
42737.5
LAGOONS
t OF
PLANTS
59
65
12
21
0
157
164
126
18
34
3
345
470
314
18
13
6
821
512
440
100
135
23
1,210
916
722
109
90
10
1,847
1.374
649
100
112
9
2,244
1,278
378
50
31
5
1,742
740
301
49
62
3
1,155
394
319
92
134
18
957
289
145
38
40
3
515
6,196
3,459
586
672
80
10,993
TOTAL
FLOW
3.3
15.9
7.9
50.3
0.0
77.3
8.7
25.3
14.3
133.1
400.0
581.3
26.2
61.3
13.7
26.1
204.2
331.3
23.6
103.0
73.7
426.9
584.7
1211.6
51.6
164.3
79.2
226.5
231.8
753.3
63.5
145.4
73.4
310.0
175. 5
765.6
55.3
81.0
35.0
82.2
178.7
431.9
29.7
67.5
34.6
169.0
54.4
355.0
21.1
75.1
67.7
490.1
471.6
1125.4
14.8
32.3
29.7
116.2
83.0
275.8
297.4
770.6
428.8
2029.8
2381.6
5908.0
LAND
TREATMENT
» OF
PLANTS
26
10
3
2
0
41
0
3
3
2
0
8
11
13
4
3
0
31
21
62
21
61
7
172
73
79
16
12
1
131
146
150
33
38
3
370
15
21
4
3
0
43
20
20
3
10
2
55
92
113
54
too
17
376
78
51
12
18
2
161
482
522
153
249
32
1,438
TOTAL
FLOW
1.2
2.6
1.9
3.0
0.0
8.4
0.0
1.0
2.3
13.5
0.0
16.7
0.5
3.3
2.8
10.2
0.0
16.6
1.4
14.7
15.7
241.2
150.1
422.8
4.3
18.4
10.7
21.4
52.0
106.6
7.1
37.4
23.3
97.3
51.9
216.8
0.9
5.5
2.8
8.6
0.0
17.6
0.7
4.3
i.l
34.3
24.7
65.9
4.2
30.1
40.1
J67.0
463.3
904.5
4.4
12.1
10.2
54.6
30.3
111.5
24.4
128.7
111.2
850.7
772.2
1887.0
ACTIVATED
SLUDGE
* OF TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
55 3.3
96 26.9
42 30.7
156 533.0
48 1654.8
397 2248.5
'76 4.7
150 42.2
70 52.3
177 678.3
74 4185.9
547 4963.2
283 15.4
487 137.7
192 140. 5
259 809.8
59 2759.5
1,280 3862.6
568 28.0
542 134.4
196 148.9
468 1682.8
114 3586.1
1,888 5579.9
444 24.9
511 131.5
192 142.9
430 1415.7
122 7245.9
1.699 8960.7
292 13.2
374 98.1
151 114.8
258 848.6
51 1BB8.4
1,126 2962.9
107 6.0
103 25.7
39 29.5
59 236.5
26 985.3
334 1282.9
31 1.4
31 8.4
12 9.4
46 148.6
10 384.5
130 552.3
42 1.9
74 21.8
50 37.3
134 540.5
48 2227.4
348 2828.8
41 2.5
113 30.8
28 20.3
82 298.4
20 586.3
284 938.1
1,939 100.9
2,481 657.1
972 726.1
2.069 7191.9
572 25504
C.033 34179
OXIDATION
DITCH
* OF
PLANTS
4
16
6
2
0
28
2
12
8
6
2
30
10
28
11
6
0
55
10
49
22
38
1
120
34
104
IB
17
2
175
182
198
105
68
5
558
29
108
32
21
0
190
5
14
8
15
0
42
0
10
10
12
1
33
8
31
10
8
0
57
284
570
230
193
11
1,288
TOTAL
FLOW
0.4
4.3
4.0
5.4
0.0
13.8
0.2
2.8
6.4
19.2
38.0
66.4
0.8
9.1
8.5
12.1
0.0
30.5
0.9
14.4
15.8
117.8
12.0
160.7
2.4
25.9
12.6
35.1
27.5
103.3
10.6
52.1
76.1
172.2
75.7
386.5
2.1
28.4
22.7
42.5
0.0
95.6
0.4
4.0
6.0
43.0
0.0
53.3
0.0
3.6
8.0
22.4
13.3
47.2
0.6
8.5
7.0
14.6
0.0
30.5
18.0
152.5
166.6
483.8
166.5
987.2
TRICKLING
FILTER
t OF
PLANTS
1
3
3
25
5
37
3
43
29
67
7
149
10
39
24
77
5
155
5
36
39
175
27
282
41
169
80
123
25
438
4
46
50
117
16
233
58
122
37
79
14
310
2
11
5
36
10
64
5
IB
15
56
17
111
4
23
18
35
6
86
133
510
300
790
132
1,865
TOTAL
FLOM
0.1
1.2
2.3
94.5
66.0
163.9
0.2
12.9
21.8
230.5
139.7
404.9
0.7
12.9
18.4
238.0
328.5
598.3
0.4
11.9
28.6
648.4
620.8
1309.9
3.0
49.7
58.0
367.8
836.1
1314.3
0.3
14.5
40.1
376.1
574.4
1005.2
3.9
31.3
25.9
237.5
387.2
685.6
0.2
2.8
3.8
134.0
308.8
449.3
0.4
5.4
11.2
202.1
520.8
739.6
0.4
7.3
13.9
144.0
139.8
305.3
9.1
149.3
223.7
2672.4
3921.5
6975.8
RBC
* OF
PLANTS
7
6
8
20
3
44
2
19
6
19
3
49
4
23
14
33
3
77
6
23
20
46
8
103
16
84
47
81
7
235
1
2
7
11
5
26
3
48
14
30
1
96
1
2
2
12
1
18
5
6
3
20
2
36
3
8
3
17
1
32
48
221
124
289
34
716
TOTAL
FLOM
0.4
1.8
6.6
68.2
104.6
181.4
0.1
6.0
4.9
66.1
54.9
131.8
0.3
7.4
11.9
89.6
320.4
429.5
0.5
6.5
14.3
152.5
173.2
346.7
1.3
26.3
34.4
243.2
126.9
432.1
0.1
0.7
5.3
56.2
66.7
128.9
0.3
14.1
10.3
76.6
52.0
153.1
0.1
0.6
1.2
35.5
18.5
55.8
0.4
1.6
2.2
57.8
39.8
101.6
0.2
2.0
2.3
47.4
11.7
63.5
3.2
66.
93.
892.
968.
2023.
OTHER
« OF
PLANTS
54
27
3
1
0
85
31
7
2
2
0
42
35
30
1
2
0
68
6
3
0
4
1
14
36
5
1
0
2
44
2
2
0
1
0
5
0
2
0
1
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
2
6
0
0
2
6
14
9
3
0
1
I
14
181
79
7
14
10
291
TOTAL
FLOW
2.9
5.9
1.8
6.1
0.0
16.5
.3
f
.
.4
.7
0.6
12.3
0.0
22.8
0.2
0.6
0.0
23.3
11.4
35.4
1.2
1.3
0.8
0.0
68.2
71.4
0.2
0.7
0.0
6.0
0.0
6.8
0.0
0.5
0.0
1.4
0.0
1.9
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.0
3.5
636.2
639.9
0.2
0.9
0.0
4.0
175.0
180.1
7.5
19.9
4.S
60.1
890.8
983.0
116
-------
TABLE 45
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESSES
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(EXISTING)
Table 45 summarizes the common groupings of sludge treatment processes
presently used in existing treatment plants.
Information is provided for each EPA Region with a national total at the
bottom of the table. The Regions are subdivided into five flow ranges,
based on present design capacity, so that the size of the plant, as well as
the geographical location, can be related to the different processes.
The All Plants column gives the total number of each Region's plants that
fall within the various flow ranges and the total present design capacity
represented by these plants.
The subsequent columns show which sludge treatment processes are in use,
listing the number of plants and the associated flow. The processes are
grouped into general categories such as aerobic digestion or incineration
which may cover several related processes. For example, processes listed
under Aerobic Digestion may use either air or pure oxygen for aeration.
A single plant may have an entry in more than one category; therefore, the
sum of the categories may exceed the total listed under All Plants. Entries
are made in the Other column only if a plant does not qualify for any of the
process categories. There are almost 6,500 facilities in the Other column.
The majority of these are lagoon facilities which normally have no sludge
treatment processes.
All flows are reported in million gallons per day.
117
-------
1982 NEEDS SURVEV
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE TREATNENT PROCESSES
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(EXISTING)
DECEMBER SI,
TABLE 45
1962
EPA
REGION
t
FLOW RANGE
(MGD)
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION I
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION II
0.00- 0.10
0.11- O.SO
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION III
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION IV
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION V
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VI
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- O.SO
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VIII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION IX
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION X
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
ALL REGIONS
ALL PLANTS
OF
PLANTS
42
131
69
172
45
479
78
234
110
244
62
72B
254
45*
152
276
4?
1,190
575
916
299
540
76
2,406
970
1,277
342
516
128
3,233
842
955
289
398
48
2,532
1,246
681
129
162
25
2,243
691
294
68
114
15
1,182
198
239
92
206
65
800
184
226
71
135
22
638
5,100
5,412
1,621
2,763
535
15,431
TOTAL
FLOH
3.4
37.4
52.3
549.5
1470.8
2113.2
4.6
69. 2
84.3
842.8
3494.0
4494.7
13.8
127.1
115.9
910.0
2377. i
3544.0
26.8
250.9
236.0
1890.7
2317.4
4721.6
57.8
316.2
253.7
1568.4
6326. S
9022.7
43.7
251.8
226.7
1190.1
1504.0
3216.1
40. 8
161.1
96.9
486.8
1064.6
1869.9
28.7
69. £
53.0
S71.7
481.3
1004.3
10.3
«7.7
71.6
727.0
3166.6
4043.0
10.5
59.3
55.1
441.4
672.6
1238.7
259.9
1410.0
1245.0
8978.1
23375.1
35267.8
AEROBIC
DIGESTION
t OF
PLANTS
7
29
15
18
2
71
20
48
25
26
3
122
94
131
26
45
3
299
99
277
95
220
18
709
189
313
118
172
17
809
199
250
100
166
7»
120
125
46
33
2
326
10
10
9
19
1
49
15
43
20
42
6,
126
31
68
14'
30
3
146
784
1,294
468
771
71
3,388
TOTAL
FLOW
0.3
8.3
10.5
41.8
32.2
92.9
1.4
14.1
19.4
86.3
62.3
183.4
5.1
35.0
20.5
137.3
39.0
236.8
5.6
82.0
78.1
739.4
621.0
1525.9
11.9
85.4
90.4
517.0
287.7
992.3
8.7
75.4
80.7
525.2
537.6
1227.5
7.4
13.3
35.2
109.7
49.0
234.5
0.5
2.9
6.4
50.3
30.0
90.0
1.0
13.8
15.1
147.8
110.3
287.9
2.0
19.7
10.9
76.9
126.5
235.8
43.5
369.5
366.7
2431.4
1895.5
5106.5
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTION
* OF
PLANTS
4
23
26
75
11
139
25
138
68
161
42
434
69
215
113
203
35
6£5
19
144
86
244
50
543
127
401
IBS
341
88
1,142
37
110
65
128
27
367
76
146
37
90
19
368
9
17
13
65
12
116
24
55
29
126
48
282
6
43
27
72
17
165
396
1,292
639
1,505
349
4,181
TOTAL
FLOH
0.2
7.4
20.9
254.0
590.3
872.7
1.6
41.1
53.0
512.6
2765.8
3373.8
3.9
64.2
79.6
661.5
1742.9
2552.0
1.2
46.4
70.6
918.7
1474.1
2510.8
8.6
109.3
139.2
1068.6
4853.3
6178.9
1.9
32.1
53.7
400.8
803.5
1291.9
4.6
41.7
28.2
290.7
620.7
985.7
0.6
4.1
11.1
263.1
411.1
689.9
1.4
16.0
24.3
461.1
2625.1
3127.8
0.4
12.1
21.5
286.4
541.6
861.8
24.1
373.9
501.7
5117.1
16428
22445
AIR
DRYING
t OF
PLANTS
28
77
36
S3
5
199
41
173
74
98
11
397
166
365
117
164
19
831
146
469
205
421
39
1,280
288
616
233
300
35
1,472
323
589
206
276
21
1.415
117
194
42
73
3
429
32
36
23
73
7
171
29
95
51
116
23
314
IS
80
25
64
10
197
1.188
2,694
1,012
1,638
173
6,705
TOTAL
FLOH
1.5
22.2
28.3
145.1
532.7
729.7
2.8
51.1
55.6
272.7
527.0
909.1
9.3
104.4
89.1
468.5
547.3
1218.4
8.7
139. T
167.9
1420.0
1000.8
2736.9
18.2
164.0
175.3
824.0
2000.9
3182.2
20.0
164.5
163.6
763.4
569.1
1680.4
7.7
49.5
31.8
192.8
77.0
358.7
1.
9.
18.
261.
149.
440.
2.
28.
40.
376.
1303.3
1750.5
1.3
23.2
19.9
218.9
279.1
542.2
73.0
756.3
789.8
4942.6
6986.2
13548
INCINERATION
* OF
PLANTS
0
1
0
18
28
47
t
11
8
37
25
87
0
3
2
29
20
54
0
0
0
15
19
34
8
3
1
18
49
79
0
2
0
12
10
24
3
3
5
8
10
29
0
0
0
5
2
7
0
3
0
9
9
21
0
4
2
5
4
15
17
30
18
156
176
397
TOTAL
FLOH
0.0
0.4
0.0
81.8
B79.1
961.2
0.4
2.6
6.4
190.3
849.3
1048.8
0.0
1.1
1.7
171.2
713.9
887.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
70.7
739.5
810.2
0.3
1.0
0.8
90.3
2988. 7
3080.9
0.0
0.8
0.0
61.1
479.6
541.4
0.2
1.1
3.2
35.5
682.4
722.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.9
35.0
57.9
0.0
1.3
0.0
40.6
276.6
318.4
0.0
1.4
1.4
35.1
84.0
121.8
0.8
9.5
13.3
799.1
7727.9
8S50.5
OTHER
1 OF
PLANTS
28
39
16
61'
8
152
20
13
10
39
5
87
65
56
11
13
3
148
416
411
83
52
7
969
581
484
44
43
12
1,164
420
340
68
76
91*
1,003
367
42
34
2
1,448
650
254
40
26
3
973
144
113
33
34
B
332
144
103
27
32
2
308
3,471
2,180
374
410
56
6,491
TOTAL
FLOH
1.7
10.7
11.4
177.0
125.*
326.3
1.0
4.6
e.o
141.5
361.0
SIS. 9
3.5
12.7
7.3
46.1
231.6
301.1
17.3
100.4
59.2
151.8
133.9
462.6
33.4
105.6
29.5
127.5
849.9
1145.7
21.3
79.9
50.6
222.8
128.0
502.5
45.9
77.6
30.2
80.2
42.5
276.2
26.4
59.4
30.4
51.3
70.2
237.7
7.2
29.
25.
121.
262.
445.
8.
24.
20.
82.
67.
202.
US.
504.
272.
1201.
2271.
4414.
118
-------
TABLE 46
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESSES
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(YEAR 2000)
Table 46 summarizes the common groupings of sludge treatment processes
expected to be used by treatment plants operating in the year 2000.
Information is provided for each EPA Region with a national total at the
bottom of the table. The Regions are subdivided into five flow ranges,
based on projected design capacity, so that the size of the plant, as well
as the geographical location, can be related to the different processes.
The All Plants column gives the total number of each Region's plants that
are projected to fall within the various flow ranges and the total projected
design capacity represented by these plants.
The subsequent columns show which sludge treatment processes are projected
to be in use, listing the number of plants and the associated flow. The
processes are grouped into general categories such as aerobic digestion or
incineration. These categories may cover several related processes. For
example, processes listed under Aerobic Digestion may use either air or pure
oxygen for aeration.
A single plant may have entries in more than one category; therefore, the
sum of categories may exceed the total listed under All Plants. Entries are
made in the Other column only if a plant does not qualify for any of the
process categories. There are over 6,400 facilities in the Other column.
The majority of these are lagoon facilities which normally have no sludge
treatment processes.
All flows are reported in million gallons per day.
119
-------
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESSES
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, HITHIN EPA IEGION
(YEAR 2000)
DECEMBER 11,
TABLE 46
EPA
REGION
S
FLOW RANGE
(MGD)
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10,01 +
REGION I
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION II
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
O.'l- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION III
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION IV
0.00- 0.10
O.U- 0.50
0.51- i.OO
1 .01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION V
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 »
REGION VI
0 00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1 .00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VIII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION IX
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION X
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
ALL REGIONS
ALL PLANTS
OF
PLANTS
187
208
71
210
50
726
2(7
324
118
263
82
1,054
80!
896
239
351
62
2,351
1,077
1,014
300
655
126
3,180
1,418
1,369
351
sat
140
3,86':
1,797
1,198
356
475
67
3,893
1,445
687
143
186
32
2,493
771
338
69
137
19
1,334
421
371
127
245
69
1,233
344
298
78
152
27
899
8.530
6,703
1,860
3,260
674
21,027
TOTAL
FLOM
10.2
55.1
50.5
691.6
1678.7
2486.0
14.4
81.1
89.6
960.2
4344.7
5489.8
44.0
228.7
176.4
1056.1
2869.0
4373.9
51.2
248.0
229.0
2277.8
3967.2
6773.1
79.1
333.8
256.4
1822.2
7702.6
10193.9
84.7
289.7
265.6
14*:. 7
2H0.7
4222.2
65.6
160.8
102.3
561.5
1139.8
2029.8
31.0
76.8
49.7
411.2
664.0
1232.5
22.4
90.5
94.8
859.8
3323.4
4350.7
17.9
74.8
58.4
508.3
887.0
1546.1
420.1
1638.8
1372.3
10589.9
28716.6
42737.5
AEROBIC
DIGESTION
1 OF
PLANTS
13
43
19
28
2
105
15
62
29
45
4
155
214
327
95
92
8
736
340
388
137
313
41
1,219
322
410
133
220
22
1,107
266
349
153
231
22
1,021
95
148
55
46
7
351
10
15
12
27
1
65
14
41
32
53
10
150
42
110
25
47
4
228
1,331
1,893
690
1,102
121
5,137
TOTAL
FLOW
0.7
13.3
13.9
69.0
34.4
131.0
1.1
18.2
21.6
137.8
120.9
299.5
11.7
92.8
67.4
266.2
141.7
579.6
16.9
101.5
102.9
1081.2
1077.5
2379.8
18.5
104.8
98.0
661.1
746.8
1629. 0
12.0
0.5
116.7
760.8
764.9
1744.7
5.9
38.1
40.4
132.9
377.8
594.9
0.5
4.2
9.1
«2.7
30.0
126.3
0.8
12.0
23.7
156.4
213.9
406.6
2.7
30.5
17.2
134.8
149.7
334.6
70.3
505.5
510.4
3482.4
3657.2
8225.7
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTION
* OF
PLANTS
12
21
12
80
13
138
56
132
72
170
43
473
92
251
132
241
47
763
167
153
74
266
75
735
119
303
151)
382
99
1,067
35
58
54
126
32
305
61
134
42
101
25
363
6
17
10
60
18
111
22
62
28
143
51
306
6
34
20
73
21
154
576
1,170
603
1,642
424
4,415
TOTAL
FLOW
0.7
5.9
9.1
292.3
700.2
1008.1
3.2
37.4
55.4
606.2
1623.9
2325.9
5.3
73.0
99.9
747.1
2193.7
3118.8
8.4
37.9
55.2
1022.7
2435.9
3559.9
7.7
90.0
117.6
1237.2
5723.9
7176.1
1.7
17.9
40.6
429.8
1122.6
1612.4
3.7
37.1
30.2
319.5
779.3
1169.6
0.4
4.3
7.3
208.8
652.8
873.3
1.3
17.9
21.3
559.3
2739.9
3339.5
0.5
9.6
15.5
311.9
705.6
1042.9
32.4
330.6
451.6
5734.3
18677
25226
AIR
DRYING
* OF
PLANTS
55
77
27
57
6
222
70
175
91
too
16
452
308
561
167
204
24
1.264
569
611
227
520
68
1,995
405
614
221
356
36
1,632
437
662
284
347
26
1,756
73
189
42
85
3
392
23
44
20
71
11
169
25
100
59
141
27
352
23
112
33
77
10
255
1,988
3,145
1,171
1,958
227
8,489
TOTAL
FLOW
3.3
22.3
19.5
167.8
613.1
825.8
4.0
49.9
68.3
297.2
765.4
1184.6
16.9
160.4
124.4
542.6
684.7
1528.9
28.4
155.8
170.1
1753.0
1688.8
3795.9
23.8
162.2
163.6
1011.1
2155.8
3516.4
24.7
172.4
212.6
998.6
808.1
2216.2
4.7
50.1
31.4
225.8
84.0
395.9
1.3
11.7
14.8
230.6
312.7
571.0
1.5
30.6
43.5
458.3
1557.5
2091.2
1.8
30.9
24.0
247.2
311.5
615.1
109.9
846.0
871.9
5931.6
8981.3
16740
INCINERATION
OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
21
33
54
4
10
4
54
35
107
1
4
3
28
33
69
2
1
1
14
23
41
8
1
2
17
55
83
1
2
0
IS
12
30
1
0
3
9
13
26
0
1
0
3
2
6
0
0
0
10
12
22
1
3
4
9
4
21
18
22
17
180
222
459
TOTAL
FLOW
0.0
0.0
0.0
92.2
1429.2
1521.3
0.2
2.5
3.1
253.9
1410.5
1670.1
0.1
0.9
2.2
149.7
1838.2
1991.0
0.1
0.2
0.6
69.8
985.5
1056.1
0.3
0.2
1.8
105.9
3333.5
3441.6
0.1
0.8
0.0
83.8
608.7
693.3
0.1
0.0
2.1
40.3
677.6
719.9
0.0
0.2
0.0
14.1
60.0
74.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
55.9
904.2
960.0
0.1
1.2
2.6
44.5
87.9
136.2
0.8
5.8
12.1
»09.7
11335
12263
OTHER
t OF
PLANTS
120
106
26
76
8
336
17»
110
7
29
IB
143
476
288
9
11
1
785
499
383
67
51
10
1,010
921
597
69
41
11
1,639
1,271
513
61
73
10
1,928
1,268
368
42
37
0
1.715
742
288
44
42
1
1,117
373
244
54
44
8
721
294
142
29
13
1
501
6.143
3,019
408
437
70
10.097
TOTAL
FLON
6.4
25.9
17.9
211.2
124.0
407.1
9.4
21.2
6.0
107.5
1957.7
2101. S
26.1
54.1
6.1
16.3
21.6
144.5
22.4
B6.5
49.1
141.9
373.0
672. i
49. B
129.1
48.1
111.8
819.9
1180.6
57.9
111.3
44.5
201.1
187.1
601.8
54.8
77. 3
28.0
100.2
0.0
260.2
29.6
61.7
11.0
»7. t
11.2
212.9
19.8
53.2
40.4
152.5
100.7
566.6
14.7
11.3
21.0
91.4
113.5
273.8
290.4
653.2
294.0
1275.3
392B.5
6441.2
120
-------
TABLE 47
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE DISPOSAL METHODS
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(EXISTING)
Table 47 summarizes the common groupings of sludge disposal methods
presently used by existing treatment plants.
Information is provided for each EPA Region with a national total at the
bottom of the table. The Regions are subdivided into five flow ranges
based on present design capacity, so that the size of the plant, as well as
the geographical location, can be related to the different sludge disposal
methods. r
The All Plants column gives the total number of each Region's plants that
fall within the various flow ranges and the total present design caoacitv
represented by these plants. H^'ky
The subsequent columns show which sludge disposal method the plants use
listing the number of plants and the associated flow. The methods are
listed under specific headings such as Land Fill or Ocean Dumping.
A single plant may use more than one sludge disposal method; therefore, the
sum of the methods may exceed the total listed under All Plants. Entries
are made in the Other column only if a plant does not qualify for any of the
identified methods. There are over 6,000 facilities in the Other column
The majority of these are lagoon facilities which normally have no sludge
disposal. 3
All flows are reported in million gallons per day.
121
-------
1*62 NEEDS SURVEY
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE DISPOSAL METHODS
BY DESIGN CAPACITY. WITHIN EPA REGION
(EXISTING)
DECEMBER 31.
TABLE 47
1982
EPA
REGION
t
FLOW RANGE
(MGD>
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 »
REGION I
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION II
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION III
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 «
REGION IV
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION V
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION VI
0. 00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0. 51- 1 .00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
; .01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VIII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION IX
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION X
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 »
ALL REGIONS
ALL PLANTS
» OF
PLANTS
62
131
69
172
45
479
78
234
110
244
62
728
254
459
152
276
49
1.190
575
916
299
540
76
2.406
970
1,277
342
516
128
3,233
842
955
289
398
48
2,532
1,246
681
129
16:
25
2,243
491
294
48
114
15
1,182
198
239
92
204
45
800
184
224
71
135
22
638
5,100
5,412
1,621
2,763
535
15,431
TOTAL
FLOW
3.4
37.4
52.3
549.5
1470.8
2113.2
4.4
69.2
84.3
842.8
3494.0
4494.7
13.8
127.1
115.9
910.0
2377.3
3544.0
26.8
250.9
236.0
1890.7
2317.4
4721.6
57.8
316.2
253.7
1568.4
6826.8
9022.7
43.7
251.8
226.7
1190.1
1504.0
3216.1
60.8
161.1
96.9
486.8
1064.6
1869.9
28.7
6'). 8
53.0
371.7
481.3
1004.3
10.3
67.7
71.6
727.0
3166.4
4043.0
10.5
59.3
55.1
441.4
472.6
1238.7
259.9
1410.0
1245.0
8978.1
23375.1
35247.8
LAND
FILL
t OF TOTAL
PLANTS FLOW
38 2.1
101 29.6
55 41.1
149 478.2
43 1102.8
386 1653.6
71 4.4
220 64.6
102 79.0
227 767.6
43 1299.0
663 2214.3
198 11.1
392 109.3
129 97.9
236 760.5
38 1690.8
993 2669.4
133 7.9
426 127.0
188 152.8
409 1428.4
59 1777.0
1,215 3492.9
216 12.8
413 111.5
164 124.0
282 830.6
82 4134.2
1,157 5213.0
467 24.6
643 177.5
218 173.2
329 1017.0
40 1350.0
1,697 2742.1
150 8.9
200 53.6
57 43.3
102 328.;
21 937 1
530 1370.7
23 1.1
20 5.2
16 12.8
55 181.5
11 265.6
125 466.1
58 3.2
124 36.8
59 46.8
168 596.4
54 2446.7
463 3129.7
27 1.5
75 20.7
26 19.8
62 197.9
10 336.3
200 576.0
1.381 77.1
2.614 735.2
1,014 790.3
2,019 6585.4
401 15339
7,429 23527
LAND
APPLICATION
t OF
PLANTS
4
7
7
11
1
30
3
3
0
7
0
13
13
45
17
45
11
131
23
69
28
100
11
231
228
444
148
246
43
1,109
28
80
30
70
13
221
13ft
152
48
62
2
402
21
20
13
43
1
98
2
10
4
16
5
3*
13
51
21
53
It
149
473
881
316
653
98
2,421
OCEAN
DUMPING
TOTAL t OF
FLOW PLANTS
0.3
2.2
5.6
31.0
25.0
63.9
0.3
0.9
0.0
24.8
0.0
26.0
0.8
13.1
13.4
174.5
814.5
1016.3
1.3
21.3
24.4
424.6
233.3
704.7
14.5
117.9
110.3
811.5
2411.7
3445.4
1.9
22.1
23.4
219.4
586.4
853.3
8.6
41.4
37.7
184.6
65.0
337.1
1.4
4.9
10.9
175.4
170.0
362.5
0.1
3.1
3.0
54.4
204.4
268.8
1.0
15.5
16.7
205.0
394.3
632.5
29.8
242.0
245.4
2306.8
5106.4
7930.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
4
10
21
39
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
4
12
24
48
COMPOSTING
TOTAL * OF
FLOW PLANTS
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.3
2.7
49.0
2340.0
2393.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.8
140.0
142.8
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
5.5
431.0
437.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.9
4.0
57.3
2911.0
2974.1
0
0
0
5
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
6
0
2
0
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
2
4
0
0
1
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
11
10
27
TOTAL
FLOW
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.5
30.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.8
514.0
516.8
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
35.0
35.8
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.3
45.8
57.1
0.0
0.0
0.8
2.8
0.0
3.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
404.5
407.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
1.2
0.8
35.4
1012.8
1050.2
OTHER
t OF
PLANTS
22
25
10
17
1
75
5
8
4
3
1
21
48
32
8
8
2
98
421
430
88
59
10
1,008
551
443
50
30
9
1,103
369
301
40
48
7
785
982
353
33
21
3
1,392
448
255
39
21
3
944
138
104
29
28
8
309
144
101
24
31
2
304
3.328
2.074
347
244
44
4.041
TOTAL
FLOW
1.3
4.5
7.9
50.4
343.0
408.9
0.2
2.5
2.8
14.0
18.0
37.3
2.4
7.4
4.1
19.2
175.0
209.9
17.8
104.1
63.0
166.1
408.2
760.9
32.1
99.1
34.4
69.6
1438.0
1673.1
18.8
70.6
44.7
114.6
134.0
382.6
44.7
72.6
23.6
45.8
92.5
279.0
26.4
60.0
29.3
43.1
45. 7
204.3
7.1
28. 1
22.2
91.9
256.9
404.0
8.0
23.4
20 . 2
82 . 3
67 .0
200.8
158.1
475.8
253.8
696.5
2978.3
4562.3
122
-------
TABLE 48
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE DISPOSAL METHODS
BY DESIGN CAPACITY, WITHIN EPA REGION
(YEAR 2000)
Table 48 summarizes the common groupings of sludge disposal methods expected
to be used by treatment plants operating in the year 2000.
Information is provided for each EPA Region with a national total at the
bottom of the table. The Regions are subdivided into five flow ranges
based on projected design capacity, so that the size of the plant, as well
as the geographical location, can be related to the different sludqe
disposal methods.
The All Plants column gives the total number of each Region's plants that
are projected to fall within the various flow ranges and the total projected
design capacity represented by these plants.
The subsequent columns show which sludge disposal methods the plants are
projected to use, listing the number of plants and the associated flow. The
methods are listed under specific headings such as Land Fill or Ocean
Dumping.
A single plant may be projected to use more than one sludge disposal method;
therefore, the sum of the methods may exceed the total listed under All
Plants. Entries are made in the Other column only if a plant does not
qualify for any of the identified methods. There are over 9,400 facilities
in the Other column. The majority of these are lagoon facilities which
normally have no sludge disposal.
All flows are reported in million gallons per day.
123
-------
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
DISTRIBUTION OF SLUDGE DISPOSAL METHODS
BY DESIGN CAPACITY. WITHIN EPA REGION
(YEAR 2000)
DECEMBER 31,
TABLE 48
19B2
EPA
REGION
FLON RANGE
CKGD)
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION I
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
REGION II
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION III
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 »
REGION IV
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION V
0.00- 0.10
0.11- O.SO
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VI
0.00- 0.10
0.11- O.SO
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION VIII
0.00- 0.10
0.11- O.SO
0.51- 1.00
i.ni-io.oo
10.01 +
RFGION IX
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 +
REGION X
0.00- 0.10
0.11- 0.50
0.51- 1.00
1.01-10.00
10.01 *
ALL REGIONS
All PLANTS
LAND
FILL
* OF
PLANTS
187
208
71
210
50
726
267
324
118
263
82
1.054
803
896
239
351
62
2.351
1,077
1,014
308
655
126
3,180
1,418
1,369
351
586
140
3,864
1,797
1,198
356
475
67
3,893
1,445
687
143
186
32
2.493
771
338
69
137
19
1,334
421
371
127
245
69
1,233
344
298
78
152
27
899
8,530
6,703
1,660
3,260
674
21,027
TOTAL
FLOV4
10.2
55.1
50.5
691.6
1678.7
24&6.0
14.4
81.1
89.6
960.2
4344.7
5489.8
44.0
228.7
176.4
1056.1
2869.0
4373.9
51.2
248.0
229.0
2277.8
3967.2
6773.1
79.1
333.8
256.4
1B22.2
7702.6
10193.9
84.7
289.7
265.6
1441.7
2140.7
4222.2
65.6
160.8
102.3
561.5
1139.8
2029.8
31.0
76.6
49.7
411.2
664.0
1232.5
22.4
90.5
94.8
859.8
3323.4
4390.7
17.9
74.8
58.4
508.3
887.0
1546.1
420.1
1638.8
1372.3
10589.9
28716.6
42737.5
t OF
PLANTS
77
121
55
177
49
479
93
219
113
242
61
728
332
596
215
312
45
1,500
557
577
213
532
110
1,989
299
405
157
322
93
1.276
589
759
296
408
57
2,109
103
192
63
116
26
500
16
27
17
59
12
133
52
130
72
196
59
509
35
96
25
73
12
241
2,155
3,122
1,226
2,437
524
9,464
TOTAL
FLOW
4. 4
34.1
39.1
596.6
1278.7
19S2.6
5.4
61.7
85.5
873.5
2155.6
3181.5
16.3
169.5
157.1
921.5
1731.3
2997.4
27.6
146.5
158.3
1863.7
3276.9
5472.8
17.3
105.8
117.7
965.6
4857.8
6063.8
30.2
194.9
221.5
1J76.2
1855.9
3578.5
6.3
48. D
45.7
375.9
945.6
1421.3
0.9
7.0
12.9
178.8
336.6
535.9
3.0
37.9
54.5
698.1
2978.3
3771.5
2.1
26.3
17.9
236.8
460.5
743.5
115.1
631.2
909.6
7986.1
19877
29718
LAND
APPLICATION
1 OF
PLANTS
10
10
5
28
0
61
4
6
2
6
k
19
15
46
24
SO
16
151
23
69
42
112
19
265
270
441
154
297
53
1,215
103
104
38
85
21
351
108
173
61
81
6
429
14
25
10
44
5
98
2
7
7
11
6
41
16
69
?7
60
IS
187
565
958
370
782
142
2, f 17
TOTAL
FIOH
0.5
5.2
4.3
77.9
0.0
87.8
0.3
1.9
1.7
19.4
24.8
47.9
1.1
13.1
19.0
171.1
698.2
902.2
1.4
19.3
32.3
439.6
399.7
892.1
16.3
117.9
111.7
1001.1
3314.0
4560.9
5.4
26.6
28.4
274.2
656.0
1190.3
6.4
45.9
45.6
228.1
151.0
476.8
0.8
6.9
7.6
157.9
276.2
449.2
0.1
2.0
4.5
74.9
290.3
371.6
1.2
20.3
19.4
222.8
510.2
773.8
33.1
258.6
274.1
2666.5
6520.0
9752.2
OCEAN
COMPOSTING
DUMPING
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
9
1
11
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
10
3
17
TOTAL
FLOW
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
35.1
51.1
87.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
0.0
2.6
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
24.0
25.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
2.4
37.8
75.1
115.6
* OF
PLANTS
1
0
1
12
2
16
0
0
0
5
2
7
0
0
0
4
6
10
0
0
0
2
2
4
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
4
2
7
0
0
1
2
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
4
t
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
34
20
61
TOTAL
FLOW
0.1
0.0
0.7
47.9
22.9
71.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
36.4
100.0
136.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.6
620.6
629.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
63.0
75.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
21.8
54.8
76.7
0.0
0.0
0.6
2.8
0.0
3.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
8.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
21.1
514.2
535.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.6
1.4
158.3
1375.7
1536.1
OTHER
1 OF
PLANTS
103
75
11
17
1
207
171
101
2
6
19
301
463
264
5
t
2
740
499
378
66
36
7
988
876
566
SB
24
4
1,530
1.202
428
53
41
1.728
1.250
346
29
18
3
1,646
740
287
42
38
2
1,109
367
2)5
46
40
7
695
293
136
29
30
2
490
5.964
2,616
341
260
51
9.434
TOTAL
FLOW
5.6
17.9
7.3
44.5
400.0
475.2
8.9
16.2
1.5
38.9
2113.4
2180.7
25.1
4S.8
3.9
17.4
245.0
340.1
22.4
85.1
48.4
72.2
500.1
727.9
47.5
122.6
40.4
48.5
1119.0
1377.8
54.3
91.8
39.0
95.0
68.0
347.9
53.9
72.5
19.3
43.1
104.2
292.7
29. S
63.5
29.4
92.5
51.2
266.0
19.4
50.9
34.4
129.6
289.5
523.7
14.6
29.2
23.1
90.6
103.0
260.4
280.9
600.0
246.3
671.7
4993.3
6792.0
124
-------
CHAPTER III
SUMMARIES OF CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS TECHNICAL DATA
(CATEGORIES IIIA, IIIB, IVA, IVB)
Technical data on the municipal sewage conveyance facilities which will be
rfqui,nli to be constructed by the year 2000 were compiled in the course of
the 1982 Needs Survey. The data were collected using the EPA-1 form which
is described in detail in Appendix C.
The technical data for each conveyance facility were collected at the same
time as the dollar needs. The data were obtained from several sources
including the 1980 Needs Survey files, EPA construction grant files, and
various engineering plans and reports. A further description of the sources
and methods used in collecting data for the 1982 Needs Survey is presented
in Appendix A. H «cm.cu
The technical data collected for all conveyance facilities have been
compiled and are presented in the 12 tables which follow. These technical
tables include a discussion of each table presented immediately before the
table.
125
-------
TABLE 49
COLLECTION POPULATIONS
PRESENT, PROJECTED, RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT
Table 49 summarizes the populations by State for 1980 and 2000 which are now
or will be receiving collection of their wastewaters.
The values listed for the year 2000 Ceiling Population were obtained from
data provided by the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA). The projections were produced by BEA after extensive analysis which
included review and comment by State agencies responsible for population
projections.
Resident populations (RES) are permanent residents within the service area
of an established sewerage authority. Nonresident populations (NONRES)
include transients, seasonal workers, commuters, tourists, and other persons
who must be served by local systems but do not maintain a permanent
residence within the service area.
A person is included in the Receiving Collection category if their residence
is connected to a central collection system operated by an established
sewerage authority. A person is included in the Not Receiving Collection
category if they reside in the service area of an established sewerage
authority but their residence is not connected to a central collection
system. The sum of the populations receiving collection and not receiving
collection do not equal the State's total population. This is because many
rural residents, who are counted as a part of the State's total population,
do not reside in the service area of any established sewerage authority and,
therefore, are not included in any Receiving Collection or Not Receiving
Collection categories.
The Percent Served values are based upon a comparison between the resident
population receiving collection and the State population ceiling figures
provided by the Bureau of Census.
126
-------
DECEMBER 31, 1982
TABIE 49
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
COLLECTION POPULATIONS
PRESENT, PROJECTED, RESIDENT t NONRESIDENT
( IN THOUSANDS )
««»«« RECEIVING COLLECTION ««»
«» NOT RECEIVING COLLECTION « PERCENT SERVED
2000 CEILING
STATE POPULATION
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
"CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGOlt
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERI10NT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
"WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO DICO
«PAC. TR, TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
4,140
694
4,357
2,970
26,786
4,371
3,902
841
694
15,049
7,053
1,366
1.183
12,358
6,059
3,101
2,642
4,224
4,880
1,222
5,583
6,736
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,379
938
1,734
1,408
1,306
9,022
1,781
19,683
7,419
690
12,237
3,702
3,209
12,854
1,084
3,700
730
5,573
21,000
1,963
607
6,755
4,859
2,101
5,553
484
40
275
33
4,700
183
116
1980
RES.
2,125
218
2,220
1,296
19,425
2,752
1,919
491
744
5,821
3,?66
5»7
503
9,844
3,554
2,106
1,847
1,818
2,857
577
3,346
4,063
7,052
3,011
1,494
3,636
474
1,251
735
442
6,043
915
13,410
2,547
441
8,666
1,865
1,452
9,216
627
1,408
459
2,195
12,108
1,219
234
3,353
2,375
901
3,326
333
1
71
1
1,824
11
79
2000
RES.
3,525
666
4,320
2,514
26,238
4,231
3,029
819
913
13,317
6,052
1,240
1,068
12,099
4,946
2,832
2,635
3,192
4,880
935
5,274
5,772
8,780
3,811
2,401
5,357
709
1,712
1,373
934
8,326
1,546
17,410
4,588
578
12,102
3,297
3,056
12,237
920
2,887
668
4,139
20,187
1,9'9
370
5,935
4,360
2,071
4,820
619
32
209
jj
3,242
103
128
1980
NONRES.
103
3
6B
34
1,079
191
31
107
729
901
139
87
13
34
246
77
16
60
93
85
144
65
106
25
12
886
33
17
92
57
964
23
2,763
193
0
57
2
42
524
48
279
14
72
236
192
46
138
440
16
105
18
£
0
0
0
J
2000
NONRES.
233
19
181
46
1,483
577
51
432
694
1,696
234
240
81
42
503
129
21
97
106
128
460
201
234
36
27
1,209
38
26
145
191
1,536
36
4,044
453
1
104
12
81
1,202
71
516
1!
145
543
327
77
265
811
24
196
28
1
2
0
4
3
1980
RES.
530
106
305
205
1.559
36
1,213
86
0
1,869
755
205
122
287
342
158
174
655
671
339
532
1.530
1,313
218
382
319
33
47
53
335
1,217
132
4,415
1,486
7
986
197
342
2,282
324
673
16
904
1,098
78
116
1,210
631
883
421
3
27
26
17
1.117
100
29
2000
RES.
88
27
93
33
264
2
72
23
0
560
323
0
20
90
40
24
6
257
4
244
159
963
892
121
129
21
1
7
4
268
695
47
2,273
908
3
134
44
11
565
162
118
6
282
12
3
85
548
123
30
192
0
2
15
1
771
79
7
1980
NONRES.
10
3
11
0
44
0
0
34
0
11
3
11
24
0
65
20
0
0
8
4
138
80
41
7
1
9
0
0
0
63
130
6
61
103
0
13
7
3
241
0
55
0
1
41
1
15
2
28
2
21
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
NONRES.
0
0
4
0
10
0
0
0
0
3
0
o
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
118
56
45
6
0
0
0
0
0
43
55
2
24
27
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
4
0
8
0
21
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1980
54.6
54.5
81.7
$6.7
2.1
95.3
61.7
82.5
116.6
S9.8
59.8
62.0
53.4
86.2
64.7
72.3
78.2
49.7
68.0
51.3
79.4
70.8
76.2
73.9
59.3
73.9
60.3
79.7
92.1
48.1
82.1
70.4
76.3
43.4
67.5
80.3
61.7
55.1
77.7
66.3
45.2
66.7
47.8
85.1
83.5
45.8
62.7
57.5
46.2
70.7
74.0
4.2
64.8
8.1
57.1
9.5
80.6
2000
85.2
96.1
99.2
84.7
98.0
96.6
77.6
97.5
131.6
88.5
85.8
90.8
90.3
97.9
81 .6
91.4
99.7
75.6
100.0
76.6
94.5
85.7
85.1
84.6
87.6
99.6
75.7
98.7
97.6
71.6
92.3
86.8
88.5
61.9
03 8
98.9
89.1
95.2
95.6
84.9
78.0
91.5
74.3
96.1
99.3
61.0
87.9
89.7
98.6
86.8
128.1
80.5
76.0
94.1
69.0
56.8
110.6
U.S. TOTALS
278,888 164,590 251.463 11.746 20.081
71.5
127
-------
TABLE 50
TOTAL PIPE LENGTH NEEDED, BY DIAMETER
Table 50 summarizes the total length of sewer pipe in meters required by the
year 2000. These figures include gravity sewer pipe and force main pipe
lengths.
The lengths are separated into two categories, which are shown in the table
as Type 1 and Type 2 Estimates, and five diameter ranges for each category.
Type 1 information was obtained from preliminary engineering designs. Type
2 information was generally developed using EPA cost estimating procedures.
The diameter sizes are in centimeters (inches are shown in parentheses).
Dollar needs by category and size range are summarized in Table 52.
128
-------
TOTAL
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
PIPE LENGTH NEEDED, BY DIAMETER
(LENGTH IN METERS. DIAMETER IN
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUN.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
DAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA ,
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
0-47
(0--1S-)
1.668.298
137.761
291,830
538,731
881,905
18,522
997,043
190,728
2,212,285
946,625
125,684
292,143
1.273,876
1.001,431
461,530
559,728
2,179,413
2,700,490
866,813
441,440
2.925,430
1,935.557
603,296
1,249,414
1,450,744
351,413
54,114
29,274
1,147,473
1,122.285
209,199
2,320,840
3,470,244
81,095
2.235,721
795,444
304,509
1,424,907
530,189
1,790,993
103,347
2,700,349
1,732,150
245,078
300,271
1,400,121
734,434
2.857,593
587.415
84,459
49,415
70,023
49,189
1.023,289
139,444
1,021
54,183.327
48-68 69-123 124-199
85.115
15.508
75,938
57,906
92,490
18.037
53.917
5.225
578,967
282,776
17,693
11,898
98,496
71,905
76,896
130,080
91,145
218,874
7,126
27,226
380,829
49,554
40,768
77.149
104.378
7,619
24,002
5,547
87,943
137.645
21.088
89.415
361,641
2,956
167,196
36,624
62,198
50,224
18,579
206,153
19,177
240,267
201,871
139^650
202,567
16,550
31.044
3.241
1,447
248.579
2,081
5.077.825
(28"-48">
67,822
4.147
98.438
27.729
151.790
28.498
37.166
553,256
221,141
23,872
5,333
104,599
40,128
59,933
55,643
158,383
85,069
3,657
70,167
102,957
48,362
35,356
153,995
146,504
9,985
37,843
6.231
10,568
142,903
39,706
118,065
284,554
365,294
68,253
30,55.3
9,866
20,909
108,299
12,191
104, B'O
318,935
14.SZS
lll'.lli
1*8,054
24,181
77,504
249.028
4,838.189
(49"-78">
56,211
3,907
15,452
8.717
80,195
48,938
79.705
87,676
11,987
7,315
44.439
3,826
100,055
114,093
22,677
73,290
8.991
2.569
31.828
1,042
56,900
46,756
141,860
12.809
23,439
223,704
5,181
16,001
35,600
8,60(.
1,373,781
200*
(79"+>
39,274
24,420
10,503
4,12*
1,478
11,447
31,394
21,322
488
4,831
20,253
38,473
210,838
DECEMBER 31, 1982
TABLE 50
CENTIMETERS)
0-47
(0--18-)
2,014,484
274,271
1,087,521
1,027,488
5,745.434
321.923
2,075.887
144,208
5,605,821
2,526.196
580,247
673,162
733,482
1,085,190
858,498
597,006
,492.365
,192,522
756,615
,070,912
,448,980
,638,681
765,627
788,406
960,055
92,558
273,262
241,331
1,316,752
1,763,948
360,901
5,654,944
2,930,698
24,877
2,192,426
847,624
936,472
8,341,711
444,837
2,427,972
38,337
2,212,857
9,242,945
509,481
217,014
2,709,474
2.347,181
3.001,444
1,435,878
18,112
98,638
564,073
34,286
136,973
86.108.438
48-68 69-123 124-199 200*
(19"-27->
9,741
15,104
13,478
149.160
31.568
29.404
2.271
48.849
7,972
15,931
14,648
32,385
11.085
23,288
80,611
2,382
23,794
3,123
39,597
34,682
29,141
18,775
17,178
4,927
5,161
5,643
20,076
31.283
877
72,071
2,241
1,152
37,323
7,241
30,777
66,474
41,779
44,506
10,990
243,160
10,621
9,605
43,045
122,751
5,524
38,652
7,540
1,517,607
<28"-48")
5,532
10.430
5,264
149,849
16,222
9,644
7,167
16,812
16,741
1.523
6,544
9,778
1,078
21,252
29.617
17.675
77.782
27,049
22,864
2,147
19,171
13,350
1,899
72,653
11,675
16.888
4,804
10.656
22,986
106,419
7,474
22.098
1 .828
3*. 085
8,887
888,644
(49"-78"> <79"*>
12,987 5,39*
*,433
2,695
12,147
12,344
27,443
4,571
4,829
21,416
42,140
3,188
14,304
4,242
21,823
192.792 5,394
129
-------
TABLE 51
LENGTH AND COST OF PIPE NEEDED BY THE YEAR 2000
Table 51 summarizes the total length in kilometers of collector sewer (CS)
pipe, interceptor sewer (IS) pipe, and force main (FM) pipe required by the
year 2000. Also summarized is the mean cost in dollars per meter for each
type of pipe. The mean cost for interceptor pipe has been subdivided into
three diameter ranges. These are 0 to 68 centimeters (27 inches), 69 to 123
centimeters (48 inches), and 124 centimeters (49 inches) and larger.
The data have been separated into two general categories which are shown in
the table as Type 1 and Type 2 estimates. Type 1 information was obtained
from preliminary engineering designs. Type 2 information was generally
developed using EPA cost estimating procedures.
All costs are in January 1982 dollars.
130
-------
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
LENGTH AND COST OF PIPE NEEDED BY
(LENGTH IN KILOMETERS, MEAN COST IN
mutnntnf
CS.
679
44
112
227
474
0
675
109
0
61
175
77
155
805
567
251
253
914
1,590
487
332
2,322
1,330
209
544
489
183
5
9
585
641
120
1,659
1,107
37
1,472
378
165
1,000
417
180
16
785
651
98
226
695
244
1,946
213
26
49
51
0
637
90
0
LENGTH i
IS.
907
113
352
285
663
110
318
19
0
1,48'.
1,177
68
118
523
305
273
426
1,155
544
231
173
921
561
199
636
1,089
144
96
34
517
509
148
697
2,310
9
1.223
444
205
345
129
1,395
76
1,724
1,522
160
39
634
774
541
460
80
77
3
69
685
33
1
THE YEAR 2000
DOLIARS/METER)
FM.
290
3
17
120
107
3
94
66
0
1.902
196
21
36
160
241
86
66
403
873
158
52
267
267
324
319
396
41
25
0
143
304
1
228
744
37
219
89
28
141
22
528
41
579
341
43
38
398
112
386
112
5
0
15
0
206
16
2
CS .
112
193
110
89
182
0
253
141
0
118
106
666
126
116
133
98
147
144
112
204
275
260
195
132
99
129
152
79
195
227
253
79
451
115
70
188
63
141
194
198
137
105
135
75
96
182
139
532
152
156
91
131
138
0
198
195
0
0-68 69-123 124+
(27")
149
544
127
189
233
317
359
383
0
280
148
954
214
278
211
25-
305
195
192
290
254
367
280
229
137
204
152
295
354
290
1067
192
407
140
116
336
129
273
258
335
130
231
171
160
97
278
166
373
235
255
157
0
395
252
178
306
793
(48«)
275
1967
747
610
671
638
778
0
0
457
447
1414
689
1081
832
696
640
671
490
509
1014
1091
519
779
325
938
338
455
909
285
759
431
1046
401
0
569
387
858
600
39?
242
522
562
46?
585
0
486
794
0
2715
482
345
0
0
380
0
0
(49"*
987
5338
703
639
1931
1463
0
0
0
1609
539
0
0
2061
0
1747
0
1975
1752
0
0
1355
3539
2450
0
1825
0
1055
779
0
6221
688
4628
568
0
1221
229
0
0
0
0
0
962
1037
1463
0
578
414
0
0
0
0
0
0
1931
0
0
EH
rn
'
92
302
97
84
259
259
555
103
0
159
167
658
123
133
74
73
127
92
80
147
51
141
112
90
68
235
94
58
0
186
463
348
263
113
76
179
130
143
ISO
198
77
S3
116
112
39
141
200
242
65
129
76
0
198
0
173
226
863
CS
1,873
221
946
806
5,173
185
2,015
136
0
5.432
2,299
539
552
558
893
650
393
1,308
1,056
683
886
1,338
1.512
653
584
755
58
181
208
925
1,708
285
4,956
2,779
0
1,937
684
773
7,255
430
2,367
11
2,058
5,959
392
193
2,317
2,101
2,687
1,276
4
0
0
97
558
31
126
IS *
156
55
166
240
885
190
97
21
0
251
247
49
141
202
200
250
314
168
177
59
293
139
177
112
213
188
33
114
51
314
83
78
754
165
19
304
174
235
1.158
56
266
27
155
3,645
139
30
326
455
319
218
14
0
0
1
41
2
27
DECEMBER
TABLE 51
TYPE 2 ---"-
FH.
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
3
8
0
14
3
14
0
17
0
17
36
32
5
20
7
25
0
1
0
97
2
0
110
0
6
4
1
10
20
0
38
0
9
3
0
2
133
6
0
1
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
tai in
147
407
185
131
270
155
254
179
0
223
132
430
159
205
2S»
149
229
261
198
179
193
201
212
188
137
243
139
149
213
191
237
130
380
135
170
268
133
439
195
192
140
133
187
90
148
181
173
261
164
199
120
0
Q
226
434
215
146
31. 1982
0-68
(27")
170
509
173
137
279
192
369
248
0
190
135
517
173
306
246
219
377
165
203
179
269
278
251
212
131
213
144
167
221
218
437
137
272
106
135
232
133
331
268
334
210
129
237
164
173
254
158
308
179
217
128
g
g
421
446
215
548
69-123 124*
(48")
443
0
452
419
683
388
617
477
Q
439
380
0
416
739
538
504
1022
0
461
0
610
478
541
425
0
0
0
327
449
0
0
360
733
286
0
606
336
592
706
0
0
0
0
383
465
0
415
1139
0
547
250
Q
Q
0
1065
0
672
(49"+)
0
0
0
0
4426
934
0
956
0
926
0
0
0
0
0
1397
0
0
0
0
1029
0
1037
0
0
1023
0
0
0
0
0
0
1507
0
0
0
0
947
3692
0
0
0
0
506
742
0
0
2319
0
0
0
Q
Q
0
0
o
0
FH.
0
o
179
0
298
0
248
0
Q
0
68
1390
0
259
96
74
0
35
0
123
1549
205
94
109
127
132
0
169
0
176
114
0
148
0
222
71
24
275
320
244
"2
98
240
0
100
59
115
0
252
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
D1ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OH70
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 26.590 27.757 11,335 188 233 681 1727
NOTES: 1. PIPE CATEGORIES ARE COLLECTOR (CS.), INTERCEPTOR (IS.),
144 73,828 14,218
AND FORCE MAIN (FM.).
217 620 1571
231
2. INTERCEPTOR PIPE CATEGORIES ARE DIAMETER IN CENTIMETERS (MAXIMUM INCHES IN PARATHESES).
131
-------
TABLE 52
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR ALL PIPE SIZE CATEGORIES, BY DIAMETER
5n ^mmariz" the *>trt dollar needs for all pipe required by the year
s a-'in1ed for gravity sewer pl> an* force
wp Thi * -,. n pe.
Where Table 51 provided dollar needs by pipe category (collector sewEr
interceptor sewer, etc.), Table 52 provides dollar needs by size range for
all pipe categories. Table 52 is an extension of Table 50.
The dollar needs are separated into two parts, which are shown in the table
as Type 1 and Type 2 Estimates, and five diameter ranges for each part
Type 1 information was obtained from preliminary engineering designs. Type
2 information was generally developed using EPA cost estimating procedures
The diameter sizes are in centimeters (inches are shown in parentheses).
It is noted that about 75 percent of the dollar needs are for pipes with a
diameter less than or equal to 47 centimeters (18 inches).
132
-------
DOLLAR NEEDS
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
FOR ALL PIPE SIZE CATEGORIES, BY DIAMETER
(THOUSANDS OF 1962 DOLLARS)
0-47
(0--1S-)
186,868
53,682
32,395
63,912
162,138
3,275
272.476
25,715
322,266
123,982
68.046
42,630
182,498
135,169
54,371
108,314
305,900
279,450
186,321
107,925
720,479
363,265
66,200
121,945
252,200
50,041
7,774
8,185
261,927
556,593
24,552
957,955
387,090
5,916
491,609
70,690
46,643
281,615
117,131
165,025
11,239
364,727
167,319
20,644
56,161
194,473
264,368
435,359
106,116
10,064
6,517
11,343
17,449
192,585
31,459
810
9.627,021
48-68 69-123 124-199
(19--27-)
21,861
13,226
12,003
12,788
38,079
8,104
26,392
4,174
204,761
53,572
21,120
5,676
45,761
14,300
28,409
50,352
45,096
46,490
2,636
12,818
184,785
14,395
16,190
18,604
37,017
2,456
8,842
2,708
45,317
71,491
6,327
53,113
87,253
647
65,765
10,943
25,903
20,911
6,756
43,181
7,606
70,579
63.606
4,334
1,617
32,554
109,738
5,691
16,522
1,579
482
46,463
1,797
1,752,852
(28"-48">
18,738
6,160
73,552
13,535
97,631
18,184
52,020
210,159
97,419
31,639
4,747
113,034
33,411
41,757
35.662
107,103
47,384
1,865
71,157
109,321
25.573
27,574
50,108
137,904
3,379
17,235
5,669
3,016
117,640
17,130
131,528
116,402
206,355
26,172
25,553
5,922
8,314
32,657
6,375
57,703
151,305
8,391
77,467
126,188
456,373
11,670
26.801
94,770
3,161,852
(49"-78">
55,137
20,660
10,670
5,576
112,941
71,645
146,502
31,768
24,706
5,068
87,799
6,704
133,440
255,828
22.411
123,597
9,469
2,004
52,569
716
252,758
26,563
162,309
2,942
13,500
195,915
7,581
9,177
14,753
16,624
1,881,759
200+ 0-47
(79-+) (0--18")
299,904
118.163
197,762
134,465
117,843 1,536,013
52,123
531,495
26,401
21,369 1,240,931
6,115 334.472
257,033
107,064
160,223
258,680
18,416 134,808
152,828
370.032
233,349
134,046
213,547
4,149 295,415
189,355 347,896
110,081 142,522
105,924
225.276
13,087
41,703
51,108
256,399
164,342 429,273
47,619
13,814 2,046,663
391,737
3,609
16,935 572,696
112,360
390,029
1,691,214
86,892
363,546
5,007
28,571 409,648
74,606 1,038,121
77,201
38,865
445,477
614,139
496,948
287,707
2,292
22,598
245,383
7,381
23,184
767,596 17,822,496
DECEMBER 31, 1962
TABLE 52
48-68 69-123 124-199 200+
(19--27-)
3,014
5,157
3,535
62,563
9,106
14,593
1,045
13,382
1,912
8.852
4,624
17,575
4,614
11,350
44,744
663
8,511
1,020
17,250
12,864
12,222
6,677
3,551
1,583
1,737
1,969
6,636
13.726
169
34,350
375
307
14,202
1,759
13,414
33,870
15.112
30.236
14.689
78,567
3,195
4,230
11,963
54,545
2.071
10,181
5,418
623,128
(28--4B"")
2.456
4,719
2,207
101,807
6,301
5,960
3,424
7,394
6,364
4,021
2,728
7,230
581
10,717
30,276
8,149
50.792
12.953
12,371
914
6,270
5,996
684
53,259
3,347
10,240
1,615
6,317
14,674
40,377
3,476
10,226
59,469
12,098
459
38,462
5,980
554,313
(49"-78"> (79"+)
80,159 1,216
6,009
2,579
11,260
17.249
58,302
4,744
4,945
32,560
39,942
11,776
8.256
3,163
50,623
331,587 1,216
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEN HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEN MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SCUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
HOTEi 1. PIPE CATEGORIES ARE DIAMETER IN CENTIMETERS (INCHES IN PARATHESES).
133
-------
TABLE 53
NUMBER, CAPACITY, AND COST OF NEW PUMP STATIONS
Table 53 summarizes the pump station requirements for the year 2000. The
summary presents the number of pump stations required and the total average
daily pumping capacity in thousand cubic meters per day. Also summarized
are the total dollar needs and the mean cost per pump station in January
1982 dollars.
The data have been separated into two general categories which are shown in
the table as Type 1 and Type 2 Estimates. Type 1 information was obtained
from preliminary engineering designs. Type 2 information was generally
developed using EPA cost estimating procedures.
134
-------
DECEMBER 51,
TABLE S3
1982
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER, CAPACITY AND COST OF NEW PUMP STATIONS
(THOUSANDS OF 1982 DOLLARS)
STATE
NUMBER
OF
STATIONS
429
13
18
144
147
0
116
192
0
1,848
129
19
129
206
313
105
178
1,155
1,122
236
264
389
626
619
364
1,249
20
23
4
157
174
13
1,561
753
43
1,425
88
38
197
38
361
20
1,663
908
17
66
324
120
1,781
143
5
0
27
2
272
93
3
TOTAL TOTAL
CAPACITY
(KCMD)
1,151
61
41
185
3,384
0
840
54
0
10,754
954
79
60
357
164
215
125
1,097
506
343
953
1,599
534
316
543
&40
50
33
14
276
1,087
71
579
1,343
69
650
101
74
230
127
1,080
47
1,575
1,027
33
22
1.022
158
4,355
283
5
0
15
3
313
20
3
COST
27,510
1,264
1,579
14,730
73,875
0
39,949
13,924
0
383,833
38,144
18,430
3,512
21,622
21,420
17,655
12,351
84,690
128,040
32,228
8,570
137,987
36.191
17,950
20,415
86,978
3,885
1.765
901
38,255
131,819
2,533
113,790
61,195
2,884
50,548
10,422
5,311
37,748
16,833
55,965
1,672
60,952
34,187
1 ,252
10,104
61,996
31,191
45,216
19,402
275
0
2,883
6,462
70,698
7,645
341
MEAN
COST
(4
97
87
102
502
0
344
72
0
207
295
970
27
104
68
168
69
73
114
136
32
354
57
28
56
69
194
76
225
243
757
194
72
81
67
35
118
139
191
442
155
83
36
37
73
153
191
259
25
135
55
0
106
3,231
259
82
113
««*»**«itli*ii« TYPE 2 ESTIMATES *«««««»»»««
MEAN
COST
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N. MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 20,34* 40,245 2,130,177 104 1,240
NOTE: 1. PUMP STATION CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY (KCMD).
NUMBER
OF
STATIONS
0
0
7
0
28
0
51
2
0
«
8
0
0
17
3
55
8
20
0
35
16
32
9
221
2
22
0
2
0
114
2
0
241
3
0
7
1
39
24
14
10
44
14
4
0
8
139
30
0
6
0
0
0
0
7
0
9
TOTAL
CAPACITY
(KCMD)
0
0
9
0
159
0
118
7
0
10
299
0
0
110
1
61
44
27
0
11
56
129
1
2
52
13
0
4
0
61
2
0
245
7
0
13
0
45
28
19
27
9
8
50
0
6
19
697
0
9
0
0
0
0
17
0
20
TOTAL
COST
0
0
708
0
9,834
0
7,506
969
0
452
2,909
0
0
4,478
433
5,240
2,230
692
0
2,605
4,939
9,851
987
1,162
820
3,470
0
315
0
15,440
278
0
31,718
227
0
692
37
14,224
4,609
4,301
1,670
1,525
603
3,832
0
516
6,217
91,943
0
676
0
0
0
0
2,678
0
2,183
2,414
242,969
0
0
101
0
351
0
147
484
0
75
363
0
0
263
144
149
278
34
0
74
308
307
109
5
410
157
0
157
0
135
139
0
131
75
0
98
37
364
192
307
167
34
43
958
0
64
44
,064
0
112
0
0
0
0
382
0
242
195
135
-------
TABLE 54
NUMBER OF FACILITIES NEEDING COLLECTOR SEWERS
BY SERVICE-AREA POPULATION AND PER-CAPITA COST
Table 54 summarizes for the nation the number of communities having
collector sewer needs.
The summary is presented in matrix form. The matrix delineates the number
of communities needing collectors by service area population and dollar
needs per capita. The percentages listed represent the percent of the
national total of communities needing collectors shown in each category.
All costs are in January 1982 dollars.
The service area populations were based on the total 1980 resident
population in a community. The population in a community meeting the
qualifications of the "Two-Thirds Rule" was used to calculate the dollar per
capita value. This rule states that two-thirds of the population requiring
collector sewers in 1982 are required to have been residents of the service
area on October 18, 1972 in order to be eligible for collector sewer funding
from EPA.
The matrix also lists totals by service area and dollar needs per capita.
There are over 12,500 communities in the nation that need collector sewers.
Communities with service area population less than 1,000 account for almost
half of the national total. The most common per capita sewer cost is $701
to $800 per capita which represents 17.5 percent of the communities with
collector sewer needs.
A related summary is presented on Table 55.
136
-------
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF FACILITIES NEEDING COLLECTOR SEWERS
BY SERVICE-AREA POPULATION AND PER-CAPITA COST
DECEMBER 31, 1982
TABLE 54
bULLbCIUH
SEWER
COST
«/CAPITA
0-100
101-200
201-300
301-400
401-500
501-600
601-700
701-800
801-900
901-1000
1001-1100
1101-1200
1201-1300
1301-1400
1401-1500
>1500
TOTAL
TOTAL
NUMBER
109
121
153
180
720
1.451
1,501
2.199
1.909
1.125
1.237
624
183
121
94
820
12.547
X
0.8
0.9
1.2
1.4
5.7
11.5
11.9
17.5
15.2
8.9
9.8
4.9
1.4
0.9
0.7
6.5
100.0
0-999
NUMBER
13
18
28
55
299
779
804
1,265
1.056
530
419
271
62
68
50
421
6,138
X
0.1
0.1
D.2
0.4
2.3
6.2
6.4
10.0
8.4
4.2
3.3
2.1
0.4
0.5
0.3
3.3
48.9
1,000-4,999
NUMBER
34
45
71
40
248
448
484
599
605
385
449
165
41
35
22
268
3,959
X
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.4
1.9
3.5
3.8
4.7
4.8
3.0
3.5
1.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
2.1
31.5
5,000-9
NUMBER
22
19
22
25
73
103
94
137
109
95
128
54
23
6
12
63
985
,»99
X
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.5
7.8
10,000-49.999
NUMBER
26
34
25
32
71
104
106
165
124
102
190
105
44
11
7
59
1.205
X
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.8
0.8
1.3
0.9
0.8
1.5
0.8
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.4
9.6
50K-100K
NUMBER
6
3
4
1
U
14
8
21
7
10
34
18
10
1
1
4
158
X
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
>100K
NUMBER
8
2
3
7
13
3
5
12
8
3
17
11
3
0
2
5
102
X
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
137
-------
TABLE 55
PERCENT OF DOLLAR NEEDS FOR COLLECTOR SEWERS
BY SERVICE-AREA POPULATION AND PER-CAPITA COST
Table 55 summarizes for the nation the distribution of dollar needs for
collector sewers.
The summary is presented in matrix form. The matrix shows national
collector sewer dollar needs by service area population versus collector
sewer dollar needs per capita. For service areas of a given population
range, listed below are the percentages of the population group with per
capita dollar needs in the ranges shown in the far left column. Also shown
is the percentage of the national total dollar needs that each per capita
dollar range represents for a given population group. For example, 16.2
percent of communities less than 1,000 people have dollar needs in the $701
to $800 per capita range. These needs represent 1.8 percent of the total
needs nationally.
The service area populations were based on the total 1980 resident
population in a community. The population in a community that met the
qualifications of the Two-Thirds Rule was used to calculate the dollar per
capita value. This rule states that two-thirds of the population requiring
collector sewers in 1982 are required to have been residents of the service
area on October 18, 1972 in order to be eligible for collector sewer funding
from EPA.
Communities with service area populations less than 1,000 account for about
11.6 percent of the total national collector sewer dollar needs.
Communities with per capita needs between $701 and $800 account for about
15.3 percent of the national total. Although not shown on the table, total
national dollar needs for collector sewers are approximately $20.7 billion,
expressed in January 1982 dollars.
Table 55 is an extension of Table 54.
138
-------
ltB2 NEEDS SURVEY
PERCENT OF DOUA* NEEDS FOR COLLECTOR SENERS
1Y SERVICE-AREA POPULATION AND PER-CAPITA COST
DECEMBER 31.
TABLE 55
COLLECTOR
SEHER
COST
I/CAPITA
0-100
101-200
201-300
301-400
401-500
501-tOO
tOl-700
701-BOD
B01-»OB
*01-1000
1001-1100
1101-1200
1201-1300
1301-1400
1401-1500
>1500
TOTAL
TOTAl
X OF
NATl.
TOTAL
COST
0.4
O.t
l.t
2.B
5.4
t.2
15.3
10.4
B.O
It. 7
12. B
4.1
1.1
o.»
11. B
100.0
X OF
POP.
CROUP
COST
0.1
0.0
0.1
2.7
7.4
».l
It. 2
17.0
».»
».7
t.7
1.5
1.7
1.2
15.5
100.0
»»»
X OF
NATl.
TOTAl
COST
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
O.B
1.0
1.8
1.9
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.1
i.a
11. t
1,000-4
X OF
POP.
CROUP
COST
0.2
0.2
O.t
2.5
5.4
7.4
14.1
lt.0
11.1
It. 5
t.t
1.*
1.4
1.1
13. t
100.0
.999
X OF
NATL.
TOTAL
COST
0.0
0.0
0.1
O.t
1.3
l.B
3.4
3.9
2.7
4.0
l.t
0.4
0.3
0.2
3.3
24.7
5,001
X OF
POP.
CROUP
COST
0.3
0.4
0.7
1*1
3.1
5.3
t.2
IT. 3
10.0
10.7
It. 9
a. 4
2.7
1.0
l.t
13. t
100.0
SERVICE-AREA POPULATION
10. ooo-4», »
50K-100K
>100K
X OF X OF X OF X OF
NATL. POP. NATl. POP.
TOTAL CROUP TOTAL CROUP
COST COST COST COST
X OF X OF X OF
NATL. POP. NATL.
TOTAL CROUP TOTAL
COST COST COST
139
-------
TABLE 56
TOTAL ESTIMATED I/I FLOW TO TREATMENT PLANTS
I/I THAT IS COST EFFECTIVE TO REMOVE
Table 56 summarizes by State the infiltration/inflow (I/I) quantities which
are cost effective to eliminate from conveyance systems rather than to
provide treatment.
The numbers listed under Plants are summations of the plants within each
State from which some I/I flow will be eliminated. The Estimated I/I Flow
is the summation of all I/I flows in a State that are cost effective to
eliminate. The Existing Flow is the summation of the total average daily
flow being received at the plants. The present design flow (PRES DES FLOW)
is the summation of the 1982 design treatment capacity of the plants.
Only facilities being served by separate sewer systems are included in this
summary. All flows are given in thousand cubic meters per day.
Tables 57 and 58 present summaries related to Table 56.
140
-------
1962 NEEDS SURVEY
TOTAL ESTIMATED I/I FLOW TO TREATMENT PLANTS
I/I THAT IS COST EFFECTIVE TO REMOVE
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
N MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
TRUST TERRITORIES
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
PLANTS
69
0
3
24
16
15
22
0
0
51
104
0
18
94
42
123
27
81
34
10
11
13
40
81
65
51
5
11
4
9
40
0
77
115
4
68
16
34
22
4
73
6
96
138
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1*715
ESTIMATED
I/I FLOW
331.64
0.00
0.60
24.60
61.22
6.81
100.79
0.00
0.00
139.74
169.37
0.00
8.44
324.52
20.77
77.78
27.13
153.48
88.90
31.30
24.79
20.21
68.62
28.84
89.32
66.23
0.68
1.28
4.61
11.65
225.58
0.00
165.51
142.77
0.52
158.47
4.76
153.89
71.30
19.41
155.18
1.09
159.72
261.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3t422.92
EXISTING
FLOW
768.13
0.00
5.13
114.56
152.44
32.81
315.66
0.00
0.00
2.480.20
604.03
0.00
64.36
5.589.11
65.53
273.06
197.13
342.71
208.43
70.60
117.78
84.40
353.68
103.47
365.68
251.05
4.35
8.03
7.64
36.93
1.193.71
0.00
1*162.23
835.25
3.90
452.81
60.96
398.86
275.69
58.37
532.94
11.90
955.34
1*443.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
20.0003.02
DECEMBER 31. 1982
TABLE 56
PRES DES
FLOW
938.45
0.00
5.07
163.00
623.35
27.49
407.22
0.00
0.00
1.533.00
904.74
0.00
80.73
7*522.63
82.58
355.24
256.53
424.82
311.00
91.40
189.88
123.08
427.45
123.80
500.52
308.13
4.80
8.17
16.65
37.20
1,854.30
0.00
1.522.74
1*225.01
7.48
585.70
72.82
499.47
327.25
75.35
785.61
20.96
1*414.88
1*499.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23*858.69
141
-------
TABLE 57
REQUIRED I/I CORRECTION ACTIONS
FACILITIES WHERE CORRECTION IS COST EFFECTIVE
Table 57 summarizes, for those facilities requiring I/I corrections, the
action necessary and the basis of estimate for such action.
Individual cost estimates developed for each category during the Needs
Survey are accompanied by a basis of estimate code which corresponds to the
accuracy of the estimate. The accuracy of the cost estimates can be ranked
from high to low by the basis of estimate code. The basis of estimates, in
order of decreasing accuracy, are listed below:
1. Engineer/consultant firm preconstruction estimate.
2. Sewer system evaluation survey completed.
3. Engineer/consultant preliminary estimate (approved facilities plan).
4. Infiltration/inflow analysis completed.
5. Cost effective analysis (unapproved facilities plan).
6. Cost of previous comparable construction.
7. EPA supplied cost estimating procedures.
8. State certification of dollar needs.
9. No basis given.
Only separate sewer systems are included in Table 57. Separate sewer
systems are designed to convey wastewater from domestic and industrial
sources only and do not convey stormwater runoff.
Table 57 is an expansion of the data presented in Table 56.
It is noted from the table that basis of estimates are given for 3,126
facilities which is slightly more than the number of facilities listed on
Table 56. This is because Table 56 includes treatment facilities only.
Table 57 includes both treatment facilities with appurtenant collection
systems and separate collection systems where I/I flow is cost effective to
eliminate.
142
-------
DECEMBER 31.
TABLE ST
l«82 NEEDS SURVEY
REQUIRED I/I CORRECTION ACTIONS
FACILITIES HHERE CORRECTION IS COST EFFECTIVE
CORRECTIVE ACTION
SEAL REPLACE CHANGE PROVIDE
TOTAL NOT SEHER OR RELINE OR CREATE FLO* OTHER
BASIS OF ESTIMATE K"O«N tINES 5*^5 R^??NG EQU*LIZATION
SYSTEM
STATE CERTIFICATION 000*000
I/I ANALYSIS COMPLETED 882 >' »3T 305 I 7 13
EVALUATION SURVEY COMPLETED 185 I TO 103 1 » 6
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT FIRM ESTIMATE »J 0 3« 22 0 1 Z
COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION 0000000
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE Z»I 15 117 1*1 1 * 13
EPA - SUPPLIED COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES 303 153 106 36 0 2 6
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS 13" » 68 82 0 2 »
(NO BASIS GIVEN! 0000000
TOTALS »«852 1»2 93« 65» 3 20 »»
143
-------
TABLE 58
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR I/1 CORRECTION
FACILITIES WHERE CORRECTION IS COST EFFECTIVE
Table 58 summarizes for the nation the dollar needs required for I/I
corrective action by basis of estimate. Table 58 is a direct extension of
Table 57.
Only dollar needs for I/I correction at facilities served by separate sewer
systems are included.
All needs are given in January 1982 dollars.
144
-------
BASIS W ESTIMATE
19*2 NEEDS SURVEY
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR 1/1 CORRECTION
FACILITIES KHEHE CORRECTION IS COST EFFECTIVE
(THOUSANDS OF 1«U DOLLARS)
TOTAL
DECEMBER 31.
TABLE it
1982
STATE CERTIFICATION
I/I ANALYSIS COMPLETED 6*4.0«
EVALUATION SURVEY COMPLETED 21*.049
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT FIRM ESTIMATE 74,449
COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION 0
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE 270.43*
EPA - SUPPLIED COST ESTINATINO PROCEDURES 100.710
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS 57,044
(NO BASIS BJVENI 0
TOTALS 1.302.TU
NOT
KNOMN
0
6.2T2
M
0
0
13.315
3T.S29
SST
0
SEAL
SEVER
LINES
0
3*9.302
47.448
2T 1*89
0
T4.B16
31 > 1*0
Z1.944
0
REPLACE
OR RELINE
SEHER
SECTIONS
0
2*0.048
147.494
41,349
0
US. 130
29.378
33t509
0
CHANGE
OR CREATE
FLOU
ROUT INS
SYSTEM
21
643
0
it
t
0
0
PROVIDE
FLOK
EOOALI2ATION
1
12. Til
49.5S3
6. »il
»
T
Zll
54
«
OTHER
«
SiTza
33
MO
3.468
2*410
190
0
57,731
572.309
*97.*ia
41.137
13.289
145
-------
TABLE 59
FACILITIES REQUIRING MAJOR REHABILITATION
BY BASIS OF ESTIMATE
Table 59 summarizes for the nation the number of collection systems
requiring major rehabilitation by type of corrective action and basis of
estimate.
Individual cost estimates made in Category III during the Needs Survey are
accompanied by a basis of estimate code which corresponds to the accuracy of
the estimate. The accuracy of the cost estimates can be ranked from high to
low by the basis of estimate code. The basic of estimates, in order of
decreasing accuracy, are listed below:
1. Engineer/consultant firm preconstruction estimate.
2. Sewer system evaluation survey completed.
3. Engineer/consultant preliminary estimate (approved facilities plan).
4. Infiltration/inflow analysis completed.
5. Cost effective analysis (unapproved facilities plan).
6. Cost of previous comparable construction.
7. EPA supplied cost estimating procedures.
8. State certification of dollar needs.
9. No basis given.
146
-------
19»2 NEEDS SURVEY
FACILITIES REQUIRING MAJOR REHABILITATION
BY BASIS OF ESTIMATE
DECEMBER Jl, 19B2
TABLE S»
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
CORRECTIVE ACTION
TOTAL
NOT
KNOWN
SEAL
SEHER
LINES
REPLACE
OR RELINE
SEHER
SECTIONS
CHANGE
OR CREATE
FLOW
ROUTING
SYSTEM
PROVIDE
FLOW
EQUALIZATION
OTHER
STATE CERTIFICATION
J/I ANALYSIS COMPLETED
EVALUATION SURVEY COMPLETED
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT *IRM ESTIMATE
COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
EPA - SUPPLIED COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS
(NO BASIS GIVEN)
TOTALS
0
49
59
23
0
lil
31
it
0
389
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
2
»
0
11
0
43
27
22
0
122
27
49
0
290
0
1
1
1
0
5
0
3
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
30
4
0
31
2
i
0
77
147
-------
TABLE 60
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR MAJOR REHABILITATION
BY BASIS OF ESTIMATE
Table 60 summarizes for the nation the dollar needs for sewer systems
requiring major rehabilitation by type of corrective action and basis of
estimate.
Table 60 is a direct extension of Table 59.
148
-------
BASIS OF ESTIHATE
1»8? NEEDS SURVEY
DOLLAR NEEDS FOR MAJOR REHABILITATION
BY BASIS OF ESTIMATE
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
TOTAL
NOT
KNOWN
SEAL
SEWER
LINES
DECEMBER 31. 1*82
TABLE «0
CORRECTIVE ACTION
REPLACE CHANGE PROVIDE
OR RELINE OR CREATE FLOW OTHER
SEHER FLON EQUALIZATION
SECTIONS ROUTING
SYSTEM
STATE CERTIFICATION
I/I ANALYSIS COMPLETED
EVALUATION SURVEY COMPLETED
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT FIRM ESTIMATE
COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY ESTIHATE
EPA - SUPPLIED COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS
(NO BASIS GIVEN)
TOTALS
0
101,934
1.085,499
50,951
0
286,329
2,925,387
242,158
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
187
22
471
0
8,034
696
496
0
0
99,374
1,034,556
40,895
0
139,827
2.924.228
239,774
0
0
107
952
3,290
0
4,199
0
835
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,266
49,969
(,295
0
134,269
463
1,053
0
4.692,258
9,906 4,478,654
149
-------
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARIES FOR COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW AND
STORMWATER RUNOFF TECHNICAL DATA
(CATEGORIES V AND VI)
Technical data collection for Categories V and VI of the 1982 Needs Survey
was performed using the combined sewer system worksheet which is described
in Appendix D of this report. As with the 1980 Survey, data were collected
for Categories V and VI in conjunction with data collected for Categories I
through IV.
The technical data summaries presented in the seven tables which follow were
compiled from two sources. The first source was the National Combined Sewer
System Data File, which represents the inventory of combined sewer data
identified from readily available sources during the 1982 Survey. These
data items include total combined sewer area, population served, and the
types of receiving waters to which combined sewer overflow (CSO) is
discharged. The second source was the Urbanized Area Data Base, which was
required to estimate treatment needs for urban stormwater runoff (SWR), as
well as CSO. In addition, the Urbanized Area Data Base includes data
developed by the Needs Estimation Program (NEP82) utilized for the Category
V and VI portions of the 1982 Survey. These additional data items include
the estimated number and capacity of wet-weather treatment plants and
storage basins required to meet the selected water quality objectives. A
brief discussion on the conduct of the Category V and VI portions of the
1982 Survey is presented in Appendix B. The discussion includes the basis
for developing Category V and VI cost estimates.
The technical tables which follow include a discussion of each table
presented immediately before the table. The reader should also consult
Appendices B and D for information related to the conduct of this portion of
the Survey and the combined sewer data collection worksheet, respectively.
150
-------
TABLE 61
SUMMARY OF EXISTING COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
Table 61 lists the total number of combined sewer systems identified for
each State by the 1982 Survey. Each system identified corresponds to a
worksheet in the National Combined Sewer System Data File. The
described in Appendix D, and conduct of the Categories V
the Needs Survey is described in Appendix B. Totals by
the following items are contained in Table 61:
worksheet is
and VI portion of
State for each of
Number of Combined Sewer Systems: The number of combined sewer systems in
each State corresponds to the number of worksheets entered on the combined
sewer system data file for that State. A separate worksheet was completed
for each combined sewer system/major receiving water configuration.
Combined Sewer Area: The area, in hectares, drained directly by the
combined sewer system which is tributary to the subject receiving water.
Population Served: The total number of people resident to the area drained
directly by the combined sewer system.
Combined Sewer Length: The total length of combined sewer, in meters,
tributary to the subject receiving water.
Number of CSO Points: The number of points at which the combined
wastewater/stormwater is discharged from the collection system directly into
the receiving water during periods of high flow.
151
-------
TABLE 61
LENGTH IN METERS
AREA IN HECTARES
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
GUAM
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARIANAS GROUP
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PAC. TR. TERR.
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
U.S. TOTALS
* OF
SYSTEMS
0
2
0
0
0
5
4
14
5
1
1
8
0
0
14
75
130
19
3
17
D
61
0
8
34
92
17
0
14
16
3
0
22
30
0
81
1
8
120
0
12
0
111
1
3
0
10
4
1
1
31
0
12
32
47
9
1
1,080
SUMMARY OF
COMBINED SEWER
AREA
0
131
0
0
0
13.846
7,025
7,820
3,423
5,959
255
10,838
0
0
3,769
131,451
133,380
9,393
11.542
20.342
0
22.729
0
2.219
28,113
107,282
11,482
0
35,885
3,521
6,849
0
5,639
48,116
0
182,397
121
533
128,457
0
11,217
0
91,130
432
3,865
0
2,478
8,419
1 ,891
103
6,816
0
10,268
28.748
23,863
10,591
395
1,142,738
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
EXISTING COMBINED SEWER
POPULATION
SERVED
0
4,860
0
0
0
852,119
147,841
415,217
90,068
489,093
4,370
330,235
0
0
46,012
5,195,306
2.509.998
342,264
464,000
768,556
0
390,776
0
47,605
1,884,156
2,599,561
530,452
0
871,501
130,243
199,405
0
227,156
2,003,084
0
12, 105,832
8,000
16,888
2.699,597
0
245,036
0
4,152,646
600,000
220,550
0
90,991
158,285
35,000
3,818
128,312
0
537,350
502.457
435.050
568,034
14,645
43,066.369
SYSTEMS
COMBINED SEWER
LENGTH
0
1,189
0
0
0
1,641,046
81,132
954,591
320.470
1,068,696
29,195
710,043
0
0
323.429
14,556,407
8,254,963
686,410
554,002
1.097.522
0
1,674.351
0
223,736
2,966,258
12,265,108
2,553,382
0
3,412.709
381,858
584,398
0
674,869
2,646,883
0
10,781,975
34,708
71,117
9,277,094
0
1,951.061
0
8,677.615
80,520
431,575
0
268.720
685,833
40,931
11 , 179
457,661
0
1.269,233
2,654,656
2.271,838
1 , 334,454
42.881
98.005,697
cso
POINTS
0
0
0
0
0
44
3
242
53
59
10
31
0
0
24
1.015
1.100
82
17
108
0
293
0
37
371
594
105
0
91
0
23
0
164
320
0
942
0
8
1,593
0
108
0
1,345
0
88
0
1
SO
0
0
169
0
153
270
553
275
0
1J.341
152
-------
TABLE 62
RECEIVING WATER TYPES FOR COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
Table 62 identifies the type of major receiving water body into which the
combined sewer system discharges when overflow occurs. For the purposes of
this table, a stream includes all channels with a mean depth less than 10
feet. This includes classification codes 1, 2, and 3 from Item 20 of the
worksheet. A river includes all channels with a mean depth greater than or
equal to 10 feet. This includes classification codes 4, 5, and 6 from Item
20 of the worksheet. Lakes include classification codes 7 and 8 of the
worksheet, while estuaries include codes 9 through 14 of the worksheet.
Each of these classification codes are defined in Appendix D of this report.
It should be noted that not all major receiving waters have been identified
on the 1982 data file. Of over 1,080 systems in the 1982 data file, 902
(approximately 84 percent) are identified as to major receiving water type.
Table 62 contains the following items:
Number of Combined Sewer Systems: Same as Table 61.
Combined Sewer Area: Same as Table 61.
Number of Systems Discharging to Streams: The total number of combined
sewer systems, by State, known to discharge into streams. The definition of
a stream is presented above.
Total Combined Sewer Area Discharging to Streams: The total area, in
hectares, of combined sewer systems, by State, known to discharge into
streams.
Number of Systems Discharging to Rivers: The total number of combined sewer
systems, by State, known to discharge into rivers.
Total Combined Sewer Area Discharging to Rivers: The total area, in
hectares, of combined sewer systems, by State,Rnown to discharge into
rivers.
Number of Systems Discharging to Lakes: The total number of combined sewer
systems, by State, known to discharge into lakes.
Total Combined Sewer Area Discharging to Lakes: The total area, in
hectares, of combined sewer systems, by State, known to discharge into
lakes.
Number of Systems Discharging to Estuaries: The total number of combined
sewer systems, by State, known to discharge into estuaries.
Total Combined Sewer Area Discharging to Estuaries: The total area, in
hectares, of combined sewer systems, by State, known to discharge into
estuaries.
153
-------
Number of Systems Discharging to Oceans; The total number of combined sewer
systems, by State, known to discharge into oceans.
Total Combined Sewer Area Discharging to Oceans; The total area, in
hectares, of combined sewer systems, by State, known to discharge into
oceans.
154
-------
AREA IN HECTARES
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
GUAM
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOUA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARIANAS GROUP
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PAC. TR. TERR.
PENNSYLVANIA
PUEKTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
ll.«!. TOTAI B44
7.02S
7r820
3>423
5.939
255
10,838
0
0
3.74?
131.451
133.380
9.393
11.542
20.342
0
22.729
0
2.219
28>113
107.282
11.482
0
35.885
3.521
6.849
0
5.639
48.116
0
182.397
121
533
120.457
0
11.217
0
91.130
432
3.865
0
2.478
8.419
1.891
103
6.816
0
10.248
28.748
23.863
10.591
395
.143.738
STREAM
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
2
0
0
3
28
85
10
0
0
4
18
O
5
16
57
3
0
7
5
1
0
7
4
0
24
0
2
57
0
5
0
73
1
0
0
6
0
0
1
12
0
4
5
25
1
1
473
DISCHARGE
AREA
0
0
0
0
0
668
479
297
10
0
0
3.769
0
0
236
38.451
52.233
3.453
0
0
0
1.970
0
1.446
6.582
56.598
493
0
12.505
1.285
1.4SS
0
818
4.883
0
35.066
0
26
44.898
0
IBS
0
37.671
432
0
0
187
0
0
103
2.377
0
820
2.182
11.734
36
395
323.747
RIVER
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
0
0
S
0
0
9
17
16
9
3
15
0
24
0
1
4
11
4
0
6
S
2
0
9
0
0
33
1
2
18
0
5
0
19
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
12
0
S
8
V
0
272
DISCHAKGE
AREA
0
0
0
0
o
2.754
4.480
757
0
0
0
7.015
0
0
3>414
85.810
St. 878
5.941
11.542
19.988
0
12.217
0
587
3.490
45.310
10.551
0
23.041
2.179
3.394
0
3.511
0
0
53.849
121
437
32.824
0
10.498
o
23.960
0
0
o
2.160
8.216
0
0
2.954
0
4.845
7.394
11.753
1.085
0
464.381
LAKE
*
0
o
0
o
o
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
o
8
0
0
0
2
0
o
o
0
0
0
o
4
0
0
1
0
3
o
39
DISCHARGE
AREA
0
0
0
0
o
445
0
0
0
0
255
0
0
0
12
0
8.327
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
3.239
0
0
0
0
0
o
1
0
0
9.142
0
0
21.576
0
0
0
6.029
Q
o
0
0
0
0
o
1.194
0
0
133
0
9.469
o
59.843
ESTUARY
*
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
9
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
1
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
25
0
18
0
o
0
o
2
2
0
3
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
3
10
0
0
0
115
TABLE 62
DISCHARGE
AREA
0
131
0
0
0
6.342
0
6.744
3.413
9.959
0
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8.428
0
134
17.833
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.231
41.072
0
B2.3J4
0
0
0
0
S3S
A
19.243
0
3.845
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
4.402
16.353
0
0
0
218.283
OCEAN
«
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
2
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
DISCHARGE
AREA
3.63
11
3.751
155
-------
TABLE 63
SUMMARY OF PRESENT AND PROJECTED URBANIZED AREA CHARACTERISTICS
Table 63 provides drainage area and population data for both combined and
separately sewered Urbanized Areas in the U.S. The specific criteria for
defining Urbanized Areas are given in Appendix B. Since the use of combined
sewers is no longer considered accepted engineering practice, it was assumed
that present and projected combined sewer system characteristics would be
the same and that all future growth would occur in separately sewered areas.
The following items are contained in Table 63:
Number of Urbanized Areas: The total number of Urbanized Areas as defined
in Appendix B, listed by State.
Combined Sewer Area in Urbanized Areas: The combined sewer area, in
hectares, located within Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Combined Sewer Population in Urbanized Areas: The total population residing
within the combined sewer area in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Stormwater Runoff Area (1970): The Urbanized Area, in hectares, which
contributes stormwater runoff based on 1970 census data, listed by State.
Stormwater Runoff Population (1970): The estimated 1970 population, based
on census data, which resides within the stormwater runoff area for
Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Stormwater Runoff Area (2000): The Urbanized Area, in hectareswhich
contributes stormwater runoff based on projected year 2000 population
estimates, listed by State.
Stormwater Runoff Population (2000): The projected year 2000 population for
the stormwater runoff area for Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
156
-------
TABLE 63
AREA IN HECTARES
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
GUAM
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARIANAS GROUP
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PAC. TR. TERR.
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
U.A. TOTALS
«nc
UP
UA S
9
1
0
2
4
IB
4
12
1
1
15
7
0
1
1
13
10
7
4
6
7
2
0
2
11
13
6
3
5
2
3
2
3
7
1
9
11
1
17
4
3
0
14
4
2
5
2
6
28
3
0
0
8
6
5
9
0
320
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
SUMMARY OF PRESENT AND PROJECTED URBANIZED AREA CHARACTERISTICS
AREA POPULATION
0
0
0
0
0
12,732
6,480
6,221
2,809
5,959
0
10.693
0
0
0
104,031
84,574
1,822
11,380
14,083
0
5,742
0
0
21,561
90,443
9,259
0
34,947
0
6,739
0
2,597
39,793
0
146.996
0
93
75.372
0
10,133
0
63,812
432
4,805
0
2,160
5,551
1,891
0
0
0
8,527
23,567
8.601
9,469
0
833,274
0
0
0
0
0
827,119
96,806
294,047
80,368
489,093
0
324,835
0
0
0
4,821,111
1,599,102
98,000
459,000
504,160
0
136,500
0
0
1,567,099
2.263.202
504,000
0
780,620
0
191,505
0
138,800
1,896,617
0
11,295,932
0
2,300
2,115.315
0
227,777
0
3,273.150
600,000
190,550
0
47,600
116,500
35,000
0
0
o
457,591
559,660
230,265
444,600
0
36,668,224
aiuKriNAitK Kunurr IIY/UJ
AREA POPULATION
198,081
14,126
0
127,578
46,786
1,021,346
104,561
217,132
22,359
9,956
482,268
178,627
0
29,808
7,620
305,479
181,406
111,604
52,123
69,976
103,291
26,295
0
144,530
330,718
302,504
207,847
36,055
196,829
12,623
36,262
41,135
19,435
561,784
29,652
161,867
162,907
3,873
501,374
146,681
74,962
0
426,931
36,452
50,301
84,266
4,994
202,223
806,813
80,430
0
0
229,989
164.924
29,113
187,316
0
8,585,213
1,402,102
110,782
0
1,157,541
378,624
15,453,994
1,327,205
1,946,732
269,306
267,417
4,731.073
1.555,325
0
442,397
85,187
3,148,669
796,031
744,155
326,933
630,329
1,780,735
35,311
0
2,588.919
2,767,097
3,473,563
1,449,893
320,592
1,797,221
142,102
396,787
336,368
35.143
4,181,755
297,451
3,148,561
1,367,048
51,120
4,534,248
1,049,072
756,275
0
3,712,709
484,077
554,688
723,074
28,406
1,519.119
6,955,930
733,179
o
0
* 1,943,491
1,449,733
168,170
1,622,045
0
85,177,684
TABLE 63
aiUKriHAICR KUNUrh IIUUU1
AREA POPULATION
244,859
50.978
0
322,597
84,967
1,411,007
204,920
240,587
38,011
26,058
1,047,544
293,120
0
56,681
15,599
412,410
250,627
134,322
304,382
139,237
131,642
62,694
0
198,109
394,969
358,151
276,526
48,402
257,508
16,824
56,837
96,192
161,263
805,369
49,964
167,292
198,900
5,277
582,692
209,548
136,455
0
434,788
52,561
47,513
104,132
10.372
275.565
1,775.360
96,392
o
Q
399,232
244,164
32,784
266.233
0
13,231,622
1,702,400
399,781
0
2,904,408
692,603
21,144,280
2,559,818
2,126,458
457,825
699,898
10,774,658
2,519,008
0
841,227
174,382
4,255,115
1,209,516
903,622
557,243
1.056,425
2,323,091
93,015
0
3,470,905
3,302,096
4,150,579
1,895,618
446,145
2,190,148
187.870
621,924
791,692
195,685
5,832,867
501,205
5,600,322
1,690.861
69,658
5.259,878
1,477,807
1.379.866
0
3,861,647
729,987
523.520
903,647
58.186
2,049.263
14,485,772
857,675
0
0
2.873,425
2, 139,506
208,988
2,327,447
0
127,478,962
157
-------
TABLE 64
RECEIVING WATER TYPES FOR URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF
PRESENT CONDITIONS (1970)
Table 64 identifies the type of major receiving water into which urban
stormwater is discharged for the 1970 Urbanized Area data presented in Table
63. The specific criteria for defining an Urbanized Area are given in
Appendix B. For the purposes of this table, a stream includes all channels
with a mean depth less than 10 feet, and a river includes all channels with
a mean depth greater than or equal to 10 feet. The following items are
contained in Table 64:
Number of Urbanized Areas: The total number of Urbanized Areas as defined
in Appendix B, listed by State. This item is the same as presented in Table
63.
Stormwater Runoff Area (1970): The Urbanized Area, in hectares, which
contributes stormwater runoff based on 1970 census data. This item is the
same as presented in Table 63.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Streams; The total 1970 stormwater
drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into streams as defined
above.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Rivers: The total 1970 stormwater
drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into rivers as defined above.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Lakes: The total 1970 stormwater
drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into lakes.
*
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Estuaries: The total 1970 stormwater
drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into estuaries.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Oceans: The total 1970 stormwater
drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into oceans.
158
-------
TABLE 6*
t*82 NEEDS sumr
AREA IN HECTARES
STATE
AlABANA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
GUAM
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I OH A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARIANAS GROUP
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PAC. TR. TERR.
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
U.A. TOTALS
RECEIVING HATER TYPES FOR URBAN STORMMATER RUNOFF
* OF
UA S
»
1
0
I
4
18
4
12
1
1
It
1
0
1
1
11
10
7
4
6
7
2
D
2
11
11
t
1
5
2
}
2
}
7
1
»
11
1
17
4
1
0
14
4
2
5
2
t
28
1
0
0
6
S
9
0
120
STORMMATER
TOTAL AREA
198,081
14,12*
0
127,578
46,786
1,021,346
104,561
217,112
22,15*
».*56
482,268
178.627
0
2*. 80S
7,620
105,47*
181,406
111,604
52,121
6f,»76
101,2*1
26,2*5
0
144.510
110,718
102,504
207,847
16.055
1*6,82*
12.621
16,262
41,115
11.435
561,784
2*, 652
161.867
162. *07
1,871
501.174
146.681
74,962
0
426. *11
16.452
50.101
84,266
4.**4
202.221
806.811
80,410
0
0
22*. *8*
K4.924
29,111
187,116
0
8,585,211
STREAM
DISCHARGE
99,818
0
0
127,578
1,761
21*, 802
104,561
4*. 416
0
0
7,517
0
0
0
7,620
199,117
4*. 061
60,*21
0
10,142
0
0
0
0
60.688
140.020
1,*40
0
27.242
0
11,504
41.115
0
16.128
29.652
16,164
126,412
0
224,176
99,500
0
0
61,171
6.610
0
27.714
0
0
117,157
0
0
0
17,211
5.754
0
0
0
2, 211. 715
RIVER
DISCHARGE
54,611
0
0
0
45,021
69,411
0
57,657
7,72
162,06
V7.680
112,141
50,681
52,121
59,614
101,291
15.777
0
0
79,858
148,928
185.478
19.544
169.587
12,621
22,758
0
19.415
1.788
0
92,658
28,901
1,871
120,329
47,382
74,962
0
1*5,264
0
0
10.819
4.994
202.221
409.692
0
0
0
50,265
15,841
29,111
116.621
0
1.010,983
PRESENT CONDITIONS
LAKE
DISCHARGE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41.211
0
0
0
0
8.681
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11.556
18,42*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15.578
0
0
156.870
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18.922
80.410
0
0
0
0
0
70.695
0
424,176
ESTUARY
DISCHARGE
41,64*
14.126
0
0
0
172,117
0
72,81*
22,15*
9,956
158,75*
16,560
0
0
0
0
0
0
144,510
1*0,172
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
506,476
0
17,267
7,595
0
0
0
0
0
168,496
26,116
50,101
25,711
0
0
31.774
0
0
0
162,514
121,129
0
0
0
2,166,866
OCEAN
. DISCHARGE
0
0
0
0
0
559,7*4
0
17,200
0
0
67,055
0
0
2*. 808
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,518
0
0
0
0
0
16,511
0
0
0
0
0
17,192
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.707
0
0
0
0
27,268
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
769,253
159
-------
TABLE 65
RECEIVING WATER TYPES FOR URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF
(YEAR 2000 CONDITIONS)
Table 65 identifies the type of major receiving water body into which urban
stormwater is discharged for the projected year 2000 Urbanized Area
presented in Table 63. The specific criteria for defining an Urbanized Area
are given in Appendix B. For the purposes of this table, a stream includes
all channels with a mean depth less than 10 feet, and a river includes all
channels with a mean depth greater than or equal to 10 feet. The following
items are contained in Table 65:
Number of Urbanized Areas: The total number of Urbanized Areas as defined
in Appendix B, listed by State. This item is the same as presented in Table
63.
Stormwater Runoff Area (2000): The Urbanized Area, in hectares, which
contributes stormwater runoff directly to a major receiving water, based on
projected year 2000 estimates. This item is the same as presented in Table
63.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Streams: The total projected year
2000 stormwater drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into streams
as defined above.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Rivers: The total projected year 2000
stormwater drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into rivers as
defined above.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Lakes; The total projected year 2000
stormwater drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into lakes.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Estuaries: The total projected year
2000 stormwater drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into
estuaries.
Stormwater Runoff Area Discharging to Oceans: The total projected year 2000
stormwater drainage area, in hectares, known to discharge into oceans.
160
-------
TABLE 65
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
AREA IN HECTARES
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
GUAM
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I DMA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARIANAS GROUP
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PAC. TR. TERR.
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
U.A. TOTALS
RECEIVING MATER TYPES FOR URBAN STORMHATER RUNOFF YEAR 2000 CONDITIONS
t OF
UA S
9
1
0
2
4
18
4
12
1
1
IS
7
0
1
1
13
10
7
4
6
7
2
0
2
11
13
6
3
5
2
3
2
3
7
1
»
11
1
17
4
3
0
14
4
2
S
2
6
28
3
0
0
8
6
S
»
0
320
STORMWATER
TOTAL AREA
244,859
50,978
0
322,597
84,9(7
1.411,007
204,920
240,587
58,011
26,058
1,047,544
293,120
0
56,681
15,599
412,410
250,627
134,322
304,382
139,237
131,642
«2,«94
0
198,109
394,969
358,151
276,526
48,402
257,508
16,824
56,837
96,192
161.263
805,369
49,964
167,292
198,900
5,277
582,692
209,548
136,455
0
434,788
52,561
47,513
104,132
10,372
275,565
1,775,360
96,392
0
0
399,232
244.164
32,784
266,23}
0
13,231,622
STREAM
DISCHARGE
124,026
0
0
322.597
2,525
320.962
204,920
38,723
0
0
15,848
0
0
0
15,599
286,122
61,722
75.730
0
11,627
0
0
0
0
79,318
169,015
516
0
41,321
0
19.112
96,192
0
52,582
49,964
47,098
149,395
0
262,566
151,928
0
0
49,026
10,709
0
26,284
0
0
865.197
0
0
0
21,609
6,151
0
0
0
3,580,385
RIVER
DISCHARGE
67,904
0
0
0
82,443
96,765
0
61,346
0
0
16,387
274,754
0
0
0
114,718
188,905
58,593
304,382
127,611
131.642
29,963
0
0
89,178
176,458
260,093
31,862
216,187
16,824
37,725
0
161,263
1,695
0
67,327
38,977
5,277
147,644
57,620
136,455
0
172,622
0
0
49,522
10,372
275,565
781,624
0
0
0
169,692
54,048
32. 784
157,733
0
4,703,960
LAKE
DISCHARGE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82,542
0
0
0
0
11.570
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,678
15,916
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17,035
0
0
172,482
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28,557
96,392
0
0
0
0
Q
108,499
0
545,672
ESTUARY
DISCHARGE
52,929
50.978
0
0
0
245,665
0
92,108
38,011
26,058
756,384
18,366
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
198,109
226,473
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
732,498
0
35,831
10.528
0
0
0
0
0
213,140
35,793
47,513
28,326
0
0
48,348
0
0
0
205,931
183,964 .
0
0
Q
3,246,954
OCEAN
DISCHARGE
0
0
0
0
0
747,616
0
48,410
0
0
176,384
0
0
56,681
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32,732
0
0
0
0
0
16,541
0
0
0
0
0
18,594
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,058
0
0
0
0
51,634
0
0
0
0
0
0
g
Q
1.154,651
161
-------
TABLE 66
SELECTED FACILITIES FOR CSO CONTROL IN URBANIZED AREAS
BY STREAM USE OBJECTIVE
Table 66 presents information which was developed as part of the cost
estimating procedure for Categories V and VI of the 1982 Needs Survey.
These CSO control data were developed only for Urbanized Areas as presented
in Table 63. The storage and treatment requirements presented in Table 59
were estimated using the 1982 Needs Estimation Program (NEP82) for the Fish
and Wildlife and Recreation water quality objectives. The Fish and Wildlife
objective was based on eliminating low dissolved oxygen events (less than
2.0 mg/1) and insuring that Solids concentrations in CSO would be less than
or equal to background Solids concentrations in the receiving water. The
Recreation objective was based on scaling up the facilities required to meet
the Fish and Wildlife objective such that a 95 percent removal of fecal
coliform organisms would be obtained. A brief description of the basis for
Category V and VI cost estimates is presented in Appendix B. The following
items are contained in Table 66:
Number of Urbanized Areas: The total number of Urbanized Areas as defined
in Appendix B, listed by State. This item is the same as presented in Table
63.
Combined Sewer Area in Urbanized Areas: The combined sewer area, in
hectares, located within Urbanized Areas, listed by State. This item is the
same as presented in Table 63.
Number of CSO Treatment Plants: The total estimated number of CSO treatment
plants required to meet the Fish and Wildlife water quality objective in
Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Number of CSO Storage Basins: The total estimated number of CSO storage
basins required to meet the Fish and Wildlife water quality objective in
Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Total CSO Treatment Capacity for Fish and Wildlife: -Jhe total estimated CSO
treatment capacity, in 1,000 cubic meters per day (m /day), required to meet
the Fish and Wildlife water quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by
State.
Average CSO Unit Treatment Capacity for Fish and. Wildlife: The estimated
average CSO unit treatment capacity, in 1,000 m /day/hectare, required to
meet the Fish and Wildlife water quality objective in Urbanized Areas,
listed by State.
Total CSO Treatment Capacity ,for Recreation; The total estimated CSO
treatment capacity, in 1,000 m /day, required to meet the Recreation water
quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Average CSO Unit Treatment Capacity for,Recreation: The estimated average
CSO unit treatment capacity, in 1,000 m /day/hectare, required to meet the
Recreation water quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
162
-------
Total CSO Storage Capacity far Fish and Wildlife: The total estimated CSO
storage capacity, in 1,000 m , required to meet the Fish and Wildlife water
quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Average CSO Unit Storage Capacity for Fish, and Wildlife: The estimated
average CSO unit storage capacity, in 1,000 m /hectare, required to meet the
Fish and Wildlife water quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by
State.
Total CSO Storage Capacity for Recreation: The total estimated CSO storage
capacity, fn 1,000 m , required to meet the Recreation water quality
objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Average CSO Unit Storage Capacity ./or Recreation: The estimated average CSO
unit storage capacity/in 1,000 m /hectare, required to meet the Recreation
water quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
163
-------
TAtlt it
AIEA IN HECTARES
FLOH IN 1000 MS/DAY
VOLUME IN 1000 N3
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARI20NA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
OCLAHAIE
DIST. OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
6UAH
HAUAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IONA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARIANAS GROUP
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEN HAMPSHIRE
NEU JERSEY
NEU MEXICO
NEW VO«K
NOHTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PAC. TR. TERR.
PENNSVLVANIA
PUERTO tICD
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
NYOMING
U.A. TOTALS
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
SELECTED FACILITIES FOI CSO CONTROL IN URBANIZED AREAS IV STIEAH USE OBJECTIVE
t OF
UA S
t
1
0
2
4.
11
4
12
I
1
IS
7
I
1
1
13
10
7
4
t
7
2
«
2
11
1)
t
3
S
2
3
2
3
7
1
t
11
1
17
4,
3
0
14
4
2
5
2
4
"
0
B
i
5
t
0
320
TOTAL
CSO AIEA
12.712
4.480
4,221
2.609
5,959
1
10.493
|
0
0
104,011
84.574
1,122
11,380
14,003
S.742
0
0
21.541
to, 443
9.259
0
34.947
0
4,739
0
2,597
39.713
0
144,994
a
93
75,372
0
10.133
0
43.812
432
4,805
0
2.140
5,551
.....
1.527
23.547
1.401
t.44t
0
833.274
TIEATNENT STORAGE TREATMENT STORAGE
PLANTS BASINS TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT
0 0.00 .0000 .00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0.00 .0000 .00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0.00 .0000 .00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0.00 .0000 .00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0.00 .0000 .00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
10 448.57 .0143 885.07 0282 897.13 0.0285 1,179.59 0.0375
t 0.00 .0000 154.54 0097 39.47 0.0025 172.44 0.0108
1 II 323.83 .0211 848.01 0552 748.48 0.0487 2.513.14 0.1437
* 134.89 .0197 330.72 0477 174.45 0.0543 1,024.95 0.1478
5 290.38 .0197 584.44 0399 798.55 0.0543 1,944.02 0.1335
0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
1 II 403.84 .0153 1.503.74 0570 818.89 0.0310 2.890.45 0.1095
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
I 40 1, 284.il .0128 9,940.31 0388 4,495.47 0.0175 14.549.49 0.0544
3 S3 2,311.14 .0111 t, 140. tO 0439 2.450.37 0.0127 14, 317.28 0.0488
t 90.03 .0200 ISt. 17 0148 104.04 0.0234 197.93 0.0440
10 498.14 .0178 1.045.14 0372 423.92 0.0222 1.493.03 0.0531
10 435.97 .0183 I. 541. IS 044] 1,191.20 0.0401 5,382.43 0.1548
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
t 279.82 .0197 445. tt 045t 749.52 0.0543 2.004.88 0.1414
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
1 2t 1.219.12 .0229 2, 704. It 0508 2,934.25 0.0551 7, 740.59 0.1454
2 17 2,100.08 .010} 7,519.47 0337 3.893.7t 0.0174 11,395.34 0.0510
9 337.34 .0148 441.34 0289 395.84 0.0171 851.85 0.0373
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 O.OO 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
1 20 1,089.01 .0124 1.341.14 0117 1.515.40 0.0178 4.923.58 0.0571
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
t 121.lt .0074 218.99 0174 205.24 0.0123 437.75 0.0243
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
t 139.21 .0217 100.22 0448 375. tl 0.0584 899.47 0.1403
I 11 1.933.23 .0197 4.913.47 0507 4,115.72 0.0419 15,007.23 0.1527
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
1 42 4,454.58 .0178 11,812.32 0312 15.303.79 0.0422 50.443.48 0.1390
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
2 1.70 .0074 2.40 .0111 2.27 O.OOtt 3.19 0.0139
1 11 2,499.25 .0145 7,997.78 0410 1,938.54 0.0212 11.572.41 0.0422
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
7 555.53 .0222 1.272.71 .0509 1,419.70 0.0547 2,159.74 0.0043
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
2 40 2,448.80 .0155 7,239.90 .0459 4,090.42 0.0387 22,274.04 0.1414
2 202.49 .1900 43.97 .0412 481.72 0.4515 45.72 0.0429
5 234.17 .0197 544.97 .0478 585.43 0.0493 1,548.49 0.1305
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
4 39.47 .0074 71.37 .0147 52.43 0.0099 118.92 0.0223
9 250.49 .0183 891.97 .Ot51 535.23 0.0390 1,479.34 0.1079
4 44.08 .0099 293.70 .0*29 44.08 0.0099 423.75 0.0907
80 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
0 0 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
7 12 351.28 .0147 999.02 .0475 814.07 0.0387 3.241.53 0.1540
10 17 1,020.31 .0175 2.348.37 .0404 2,281.40 0.0392 1,495.55 0.0435
7 13 405.51 .0191 845.00 .0407 1.131.77 0.0533 2.839.54 0.1337
7 |1 387.48 .0144 745.81 .0319 432.41 0.0185 1,003.24 0.0429
g 0 0.00 .0000 0.00 .0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000
321 551 30,945.51 83.124.84 40.289.55 189.848.25
164
-------
TABLE 67
SELECTED FACILITIES FOR SWR CONTROL IN URBANIZED AREAS
BY STREAM USE OBJECTIVE
Table 67 presents information which was developed as part of the cost
estimating procedures for Categories V and VI of the 1982 Needs Survey.
These urban stormwater pollution control data were developed for projected
year 2000 conditions in Urbanized Areas as presented in Table 63. The
storage and treatment requirements presented in Table 67 were estimated
using the 1982 Needs Estimation Program (NEP82) for the Fish and Wildlife
and Recreation water quality objectives. The Fish and Wildlife objective
was based on eliminating low dissolved oxygen events (less than 2.0 mg/1)
and insuring that Solids concentrations in stormwater would be less than or
equal to background Solids concentration in the receiving water. The
Recreation objective was based on scaling up the facilities required to meet
the Fish and Wildlife objective such that a 95 percent removal of fecal
coliform organisms would be obtained. A brief description of the basis for
Category V and VI cost estimates is presented in Appendix B. The following
items are contained in Table 67:
Number of Urbanized Areas: The total number of Urbanized Areas as defined
in Appendix B, listed by State. This item is the same as presented in Table
63.
Stormwater Runoff Area (2000): The Urbanized Area, in hectares, which
contributesstormwaterrunoff based on projected year 2000 population
estimates, listed by State. This item is the same as presented in Table 63.
Number of Stormwater Treatment Plants: The total estimated number of
stormwater treatment plants required to meet the Fish and Wildlife water
quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Number of Stormwater Storage Basins: The total estimated number of
stormwater storage basinsrequired to meet the Fish and Wildlife water
quality objective in Urbanized Areas, listed by State.
Total Stormwater Treatment Capacity for Fish and. Wildlife: The total
estimated stormwater treatment capacity, in 1,000 m /day, required to meet
the Fish and Wildlife water quality objective, listed by State.
Average Stormwater Unit Treatment Capacity for Fish and Wildlife: The
estimatedaveragestormwaterunittreatmentcapacity,TrT~ 1,000
m /day/hectare, required to meet the Fish and Wildlife water quality
objective, listed by State.
Total Stormwater Treatment Capacity for Recreation: The total estimated
stormwater treatment capacity, in 1,000 nr/day, required to meet the Fish
and Wildlife water quality objective, listed by State.
Average Stormwater Unit Treatment Capacity for Recreation:^ The average
estimatedstormwaterunittreatment capacity,Tn1,000 m /day/hectare,
required to meet the Recreation water quality objective, listed by State.
165
-------
Total Stormwater Storage Capacity for Fish and Wildlife: The total
estimated stormwater storage capacity, in 1,000 m , required to meet the
Fish and Wildlife water quality objective, listed by State.
Average Stormwater Unit Storage Capacity for Fish and Wildlife; The average
estimatedstormwaterunit storagecapacity,Tn1,000m /day/hectare,
required to meet the Fish and Wildlife water quality objective, listed by
State.
Total Stormwater Storage Capacity for , Recreation: The total estimated
stormwater storage capacity, in 1,000 m , required to meet the Recreation
water quality object, listed by State.
Average Stormwater Unit Storage Capacity for Recreation: The average
estimated stormwater unit storage capacity, in 1,000 m /hectare, required to
meet the Recreation water quality objective, listed by State.
166
-------
TABLE 67
AREA IN HECTARES
FLO« IN 10<>u M3/OAY
VOLUME IN 1000 HI
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIiONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
OOLURAOO
COYttCTICUT
OcLANARE
DISI. OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
CEOkGIA
SUAH
HAM All
1DAHU
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IONA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARIANAS CROUP
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
M1CHIUN
MINNtSOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NE IRA SKA
NEVADA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NED MEXICO
MEN YOU
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PAC. TR. TERR.
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHOUc ISLAND
SOOTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEAAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
NASHlNiTUN
VEST V1H3INIA
111 SCONS IN
VOM1N6
U.A. TOTALS
1982 NEEDS SURVEY
SELECTED FACILITIES FOR CSO CONTROL IN URBANIZED AREAS BY STREAM USE OBJECTIVE
FISH 1 WILDLIFE
t OF
UA S
9
1
0
2
4
IB
*
12
1
1
15
T
0
1
1
1$
10
T
*
t
T
2
O
2
11
13
6
1
t
2
1
2
i
T
1
*
11
1
IT
4
1
0
1*
4
2
3
2
*
21
1
0
u
6
3
9
0
J20
TOTAL
SUR AKEA
2**! 859
30,971
0
322,5*7
84,967
1.411.00T
204,920
240i58l
38,011
26,058
1,047,544
2f>d20
O
56,681
15,599
412, 41U
250,627
130,322
304,382
139,237
131,642
62,tt94
0
198,109
394,969
358,151
276,526
48,402
257,50*
16,824
56.137
96,192
161,261
805,369
49,964
167,292
1V8.900
5,277
512,692
2M.»48
136,455
O
434,788
52,561
47,513
104,132
10,372
275, 56»
1,775,360
96,392
0
0
399,232
244,164
32,784
266,233
0
13.231,622
PLANTS
S3
a
0
26
20
141
27
64
7
6
112
44
0
9
5
68
47
17
31
28
15
14
0
22
66
68
28
14
IS
7
11
15
23
32
43
36
3
94
27
22
0
72
17
10
26
5
43
201
18
0
D
57
18
15
50
0
2E3
BASINS
84
13
0
40
12
221
41
102
11
10
204
70
0
14
8
10*
76
59
49
43
56
22
0
14
105
109
45
21
55
12
21
24
16
82
13
69
90
5
ISO
41
IS
0
111
21
16
42
«
68
116
29
0
0
90
60
25
80
0
IE!
TREATMENT
TOTAL UNIT
11,441.61 0.0189
310.53 0.0025
0.00 0.0000
1.608.37 0.0020
3,807.42 0.0181
19,013.75 0.0055
955.85 0.0019
8,777.01 0.0148
1,389.28 0.0148
952.39 0.01*8
52,527.04 0.0/03
13,065.32 0.0181
0.00 0.0000
690.54 0.0049
190.05 0.0049
10,072.85 0.0099
7,813.67 0.0126
2,645.91 0.0080
5,391.98 0.0072
4,523.23 0.0132
6,734.42 0.0207
1,710.13 0.0110
0.00 0.0000
9,654.25 0.0197
11,711.85 0.0141
10,648.46 0.3123
3,305.63 0.00*8
2,142.44 0.0179
6,693.18 0.0103
102.48 0.0023
686.67 0.0049
0.00 0.0000
4,945.23 0.0124
31,814.65 0.0170
0.00 0.0000
5,235.18 0.0127
7,186.79 0.0146
12.15 0.0025
17,252.16 0.0120
2,922.33 0.0056
6,061.77 0.0180
0.00 0.0000
16,709.69 O.C156
2,095.48 0.0161
1,466.03 0.0123
1,778.33 0.01*7
60.72 0.0024
11,271.06 0.0166
28,329.69 0.0065
418.17 0.0018
0.00 0.0000
0.00 0.0000
14,449.62 0.0147
8,747.40 0.0145
1,033.79 0.0130
5,409.10 0.0082
0.00 0.3000
171,806.08
STORAGE
TOTAL UNIT
35,478.88 0.0587
1,267.63 0.0101
0.00 0.0000
4,248.86 0.0053
10,469.60 0.0*99
54,361.60 0.0157
1,662.52 0.0072
2S, 743.59 0.0411
4,658.44 0.0496
2,995.13 0.0466
119,270.05 0.0538
31, 128.75 0.0*60
0.00 0.0000
2,511.21 0.0181
740.17 0.0192
30,520.12 0.0100
24,177.78 0.0391
8,344.49 0.0252
15(809.18 0.0210
14,246.43 0.0414
21,162.15 0.0651
4,262.40 0.0273
O.OO 0.0000
23,788.22 0.0486
43,675.17 0.0448
33,528.40 0.0379
12.OVl.ll 0.0177
6,118.38 0.0512
22,528.73 0.0154
312.16 0.0080
1,797.89 0.0128
1,279.19 0.0054
14,968.01 0.0376
76,978.38 0.0187
709.95 0.0058
17,000.86 0.0412
23,055.49 0.0469
111.81 0.0087
51.226.56 0.0156
8,256.62 0.0160
18,104.42 0.0317
0.00 0.0000
42,481.29 0.0396
6,880.29 0.0530
4,861.39 0.0*14
12,849.07 0.0500
208.29 0.0081
14,284.75 0.0504
92,989.37 0.0212
1,178.81 0.0058
0.00 0.0000
0.00 0.0000
40,253.46 0.0408
25,156.55 0.0417
3,361.74 0.0415
16,587.95 0.0252
0.00 0.0010
1,074,325.71
RECREATION
TREATMENT
TOTAL UNIT
20,799.27 0.03*4
621.07 0.0049
0.00 0.0000
1,965.10 0.0025
5,908.50 0.0282
41,708.33 0.0120
1,336.10 0.0026
22,432.82 0.0371)
3,704.74 0.0395
2,539.69 0.0395
99,250.71 0.0384
20,826.18 0.0288
0.00 0.0000
2,416.89 0.0173
190.05 0.3049
13,128.50 0.0129
10,364.29 0.0167
3,295.34 O.OOV9
7,2*3.66 0.0096
12.042.23 0.0350
12,505.66 0.3385
4,981.62 0.0322
0.00 0.0000
20.411.05 0.0*17
38,662.52 0.0396
13,104.53 0.0146
4,966.06 0.0l>73
4,098.22 0.0343
9,194.37 0.0145
102.48 0.0023
686.67 O.OC49
385.95 0.0025
12,168.06 0.0306
86,315.31 0.0414
304.36 0.0025
13,304.85 0.0322
12,304.98 0.0251
32.15 0.0025
24,060.41 0.0167
2,928.46 0.0057
11,542.75 0.0402
0.00 0.0000
19,918.37 0.0372
3,956.82 0.0305
4,051.96 0.03*5
7,220.79 0.0281
63.18 0.0025
21,099.34 0.0310
18,748.10 0.0088
615.16 0.0026
0.00 0.0000
0.00 O.OCOO
11, 24*. 82 0.03.17
IT, 65°.** 0.02V6
2,601.10 0.0321
8.269.70 0.0126
0.00 0.0000
721,479.74
STORAGE
TOTAL UNIT
63,897.63 0.1057
2, 00*. 92 0.015V
0.00 O.OOUO
4,643.27 0.0058
19,943.22 0.0951
100,651.64 0.0289
4,405.12 0.0067
83,368.35 0.1*03
14,197.14 0.1513
9,362.25 0.1455
278,478.30 0.1077
64,233.84 0.0688
0.00 0.0000
5,522.63 0.0395
783.71 0.0203
41,947.06 0.0412
32,874.64 0.0531
11.020.56 0.0332
21,529.54 0.0286
44,679.84 0.1300
37,780.10 0.1162
17,759.98 0.1147
0.00 0.0000
72,683.94 0.1486
130,963.63 0.1343
42,570.49 0.0481
16,520.85 0.0242
12,727.92 0.1065
29,353.64 0.0462
351. la 0.0065
2,390.25 0.0170
1,464.44 O.OC62
44,014.66 0.1105
244,097.99 0.1228
760.66 O.OC62
49,416.95 0.1196
42,368.46 0.0663
166.71 0.0129
76,869.21 0.0534
10,753.74 0.0208
29,894.66 0.0887
0.00 0.0000
137,675.49 0.1282
13,593.40 0.1047
15,657.80 0.1335
22,742.12 0.0885
310.79 0.0121
62,419.56 O.QV17
123,780.88 0.0262
2,234.03 0.0094
0.00 0.0000
0.00 0.0000
119,342.40 0.1211
49,964.08 0.0663
10,232.62 0.1264
25.920.87 0.0394
0.00 0.0000
2,240,329.37
167
-------
APPENDIX A
THE 1982 NEEDS SURVEY
CONDUCT OF THE SURVEY - CATEGORIES I THROUGH IV
(TREATMENT PLANTS AND SEWERS)
BACKGROUND
As in previous Surveys, the goal of the 1982 Needs Survey was to identify
and quantify all needs on a nationally uniform basis. Further, the
inventory of municipal wastewater facilities compiled previously would be
updated and expanded for completeness.
As in the 1976, 1978, and 1980 Surveys, the 1982 Survey was accomplished
with the assistance of a contractor. The two main purposes for performing
the Survey with contractor assistance were:
1. To achieve as high a degree of national consistency in the final
estimates as possible through the use of uniformly applied guidelines
and validation techniques.
2. To minimize the resources required of State and EPA Regional
construction grants staff.
URS Company of Denver, Colorado was competitively selected to perform the
Needs Survey. CH2M HILL, Inc. of Gainesville, Florida and Sage Murphy &
Associates, Inc. of Denver, Colorado assisted in the Survey as
subcontractors to URS.
CONDUCT OF THE SURVEY
The 1982 Needs Survey was a more centralized effort than past Surveys. All
data analysis was performed in Denver, Colorado to assure national
consistency in the estimation process. Contractor personnel visited EPA
Regional and State offices as necessary for data collection and
consultation.
Survey guidance and methodology were formulated for Categories I-IV and
circulated to all parties involved in the Survey. The guidance document was
prepared as an update to the guidance used in prior Surveys.
The formal Survey of Categories I-IV began with orientation meetings
conducted in EPA Regional offices where logistics, target dates, and
individual State problems were discussed and resolved. States were invited
to provide as much investment in personnel for the Survey as they considered
prudent.
The Survey field work was conducted in the fall of 1981 and the spring of
1982. As estimates for Categories I-IV were completed, copies of the
estimates were reviewed by States on a facility-by-facility basis. In a few
cases, separate cost estimates were submitted by States when agreement
between EPA and State personnel could not be reached.
168
-------
Population projections from the Bureau of Economic Analysis for the year
2000 were used as State ceilings. State population projection totals were
not permitted to exceed these ceilings.
Facility estimates were reviewed and accepted and/or approved at four
levels:
1. Contractor.
2. State.
3. EPA Regional office.
4. EPA Headquarters.
After updating the Needs Survey computer data base with 1982 Survey
information, data for Categories I-IV were summarized for this report.
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Participant guidance for the Survey was formulated by EPA, the States, and
the contractor to insure national uniformity in needs assessment while
recognizing cost and construction differences inherent to various sections
of the country. Set forth in the guidance were directives outlining:
1. Responsibilities.
2. Survey chronology, including target dates, for project milestones.
3. Descriptions of types of data sources.
4. Instructions for review of individual facilities by contractor personnel
and adjustments to the 1980 data of record.
5. Provisions for State and Regional review of Survey forms.
6. Definitions of terms for Survey purposes such as levels of treatment,
design year, and per capita flows.
7. Detailed cost estimating backlog needs for all categories.
8. Local construction cost indices.
9. Treatment plant, sewer, and pump station sizing and cost estimating
tables.
BASIS OF COST ESTIMATE FOR CATEGORIES I-IV
All individual cost estimates prepared or obtained for Categories I-IV of
the Survey were assigned a basis that provides an indication of the quality
of the estimate. The quality of cost estimates are assigned codes which are
defined as follows:
169
-------
1. State Certification. Applicable to Category IIIA only, this code
relates to certification by the State that excessive I/I does or does
not exist. It was not used in this Survey as a basis of estimate.
2. Analysis Completed. For Category IIIA estimates obtained from a cost
analysis in an I/I report.
3. Evaluation Survey Completed. An estimate of cost based on the results
of a Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) used only for Category IIIA
and IIIB.
4. Engineer/Consultant Firm Estimate. An estimate of cost based on
detailed engineering work such as completed Step 2 plans and
specifications.
5. Cost of Previous Comparable Construction. This estimate of cost is
based on the cost of a nearby, recently completed project which is
similar in size and scope and for which detailed construction cost data
are available.
6. Engineer/Consultant Preliminary Estimate. An estimate of cost based on
a completed Step 1 or other facilities plan.
7. EPA Supplied Cost Estimating Procedures. Costs estimated using EPA rule
of thumb estimating techniques as described in the Survey guidance.
8. Cost Effective Analysis. This is an estimate derived from comparative
economic evaluation for which a completed Step 1 facilities plan is not
available, or a rough estimate obtained from a 208 or other areawide
plan.
The accuracy of the cost estimates can be ranked from high order to low, as
follows:
Categories I, IIA, IIB, IVA, IVB: Codes 4, 6, 5, 8, 7
Categories IIIA, IIIB: Codes 4, 3, 6, 2, 8, 5, 7, 1
CATEGORY I-IV DATA COLLECTION
Many sources of data were used in assessing and updating needs for
individual facilities. For most of these facilities, information was
obtained concerning present and projected population, flows, treatment plant
loadings, discharge limitations, and treatment and sludge handling methods.
The data sources included:
1. 1980 Needs Survey.
2. NPDES permits.
3. Regional grant files.
4. Engineering plans and reports.
170
-------
5. EPA Grants Information and Control System (GICS) data.
6. State water quality standards.
SURVEY PREPARATION
J5on19?2.Survfy form for each facil1ty was generated by computer showing the
1980 data of record. Revised or updated cost estimates and related
information were obtained for each facility as applicable and entered on the
form by computer. Updated forms were then sent to the States and EPA
Regional offices for review. Upon completion of the review, final changes
were made to the form and the information was entered into the 1982 Survey
data base. J
The 1982 Needs Survey was noteworthy for its increased level of automation,
efficiency, and accuracy over prior Surveys. The Survey data base was
expanded somewhat by the addition of new facilities and existing data were
improved. The final results of the Survey reported herein represent a
higher degree of reliability and accuracy with the accumulation of more data
on the nation s wastewater systems than has ever before been known
171
-------
APPENDIX B
CONDUCT OF THE SURVEY - CATEGORIES V AND VI
COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW (CSO) AND URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF (SWR)
BACKGROUND
Prior to the 1982 Needs Survey, Categories V and VI needs were computed for
three levels of receiving water quality: (1) Aesthetics, (2) Fish and
Wildlife, and (3) Recreation. However, the needs reported to Congress were
based on the Recreation control level which is the most costly. In the 1982
Needs Survey, Categories V and VI needs were computed for an additional
level of control termed the Public Health level. Furthermore, the needs
reported to Congress were based on the designated receiving water use for
each individual facility in the case of Category V needs and for each
individual Urbanized Area in the case of Category VI needs. That is, the
basis of estimate varied on a facility-by-facility basis based on designated
receiving water use, as defined by State stream use classification.
BASIS OF COST ESTIMATES FOR CATEGORIES V AND VI
The needs estimation procedure utilized for Categories V and VI during the
1982 Survey was very similar to the procedure utilized during the 1980
Survey. The ten combined sewer site studies conducted as part of the 1980
Needs Survey were used to develop transferable criteria, principles, and
relationships which were applied nationwide to estimate wet-weather POTW
needs. These relationships and criteria, along with updated construction
cost functions, were incorporated into the Categories V and VI Needs
Estimation Program (NEP82) which developed needs estimates for each
Urbanized Area in the United States.
Approximately 27 percent of the total national combined sewer area is
located in small towns and cities outside of census-defined Urbanized Areas.
Category V needs were estimated for these facilities by application of
linear regression equations derived from population, drainage area, and
Category V cost data developed for the Urbanized Areas. That is, Category V
needs were expressed as a linear function of combined sewer service area and
population served, and these functions were utilized to establish Category V
needs estimates for combined sewer systems located in non-Urbanized Areas.
Categories V and VI cost estimates were developed for four receiving water
use objectives: (1) Aesthetics, (2) Public Health, (3) Fish and Wildlife,
and (4) Recreation. The Aesthetics objective is based on obtaining a 40
percent removal of BOD5 and Solids using an optimum combination of best
management practices alid storage/treatment systems. The Public Health
objective is based on elimination of 90 percent of the fecal coliform
bacteria generated by wet-weather flows. The Fish and Wildlife objective is
based on eliminating low dissolved oxygen events, i.e., less than 2.0 mg/1,
and insuring that Solids concentrations in the combined sewer overflow are
less than or equal to background Solids concentrations in the receiving
water. The Recreation objective is based on scaling up the facilities
required to meet the fish and wildlife objective such that a 95 percent
removal of fecal coliform organisms is obtained.
172
-------
The final needs estimate reported to Congress for Category V facilities was
based on the results of the needs estimation procedure outlined above,
including the State designated receiving water used or on acceptable
facilities planning documents. If acceptable facilities planning
information was available for a given facility, then cost estimates derived
from these documents were used as the Category V basis of estimate for that
facility. However, in the majority of cases such information was not
available and the cost estimate generated by NEP82 for the control level
necessary to protect the State designated receiving water use is reported.
COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM DATA FILE
The inventory of combined sewer systems in the U.S. was updated during the
1982 Needs Survey using the combined sewer system worksheet described in
Appendix D. The combined sewer data collection process was performed in
conjunction with all other data collection for the 1982 Survey. A total of
1,081 worksheets were completed to the extent possible with readily
available data. Since not all data items on the worksheet are readily
available from published reports, the data file is not complete for each
worksheet. The worksheet is segmented into five major sections as follows:
1. Identification and combined sewer system data.
2. Receiving water characteristics.
3. Status of CSO abatement projects.
4. Grant information.
5. Grant eligible cost estimates.
Data from Sections 1 and 2 of the worksheets for the 1982 Needs Survey are
summarized in Tables 61 and 62 of Chapter IV.
URBANIZED AREA DATA BASE
The Urbanized Area Data Base is a subset of the Combined Sewer System Data
File. In the regulations for the application of the NPDES Permit Program to
separate storm sewers, the term "separate storm sewer" is defined as a
conveyance or system of conveyances . . . located in an Urbanized Area and
primarily operated for the purpose of collecting and conveying stormwater
runoff (1). Based on this definition, the Urbanized Areas, as designated by
the U.S. Bureau of the Census, are used as the geographical areas which
require control and/or treatment of urban stormwater runoff. Therefore,
needs estimation for both Categories V and VI are required within Urbanized
Areas.
The specific criteria for the delineation of an Urbanized Area are as
follows:
1. A central city of 50,000 inhabitants or more, or twin cities with a
combined population of at least 50,000 with the smaller of the twin
cities having a population of at least 15,000.
173
-------
2. Surrounding closely settled territory, including the following:
a. Incorporated places of 2,500 inhabitants or more.
b. Incorporated places with fewer than 2,500 inhabitants, providing
that each has a closely settled area of 100 housing units or more.
c. Small parcels of land normally less than one square mile in area
having a population density of 1,000 inhabitants or more per square
mile.
d. Other similar small areas in unincorporated territory with lower
population density provided that they serve to eliminate enclaves,
or to close indentations in the Urbanized Areas of one mile or less
across the open end, or to line outlying enumeration districts of
qualifying density that are not more than 1-1/2 miles from the main
body of the Urbanized Area.
As of January 1, 1978, there were 279 Urbanized Areas defined in the nation.
Thirty-five of the Urbanized Areas encompassed area in two or more States.
By subdividing the Urbanized Areas encompassing lands in more than one State
into separate Urbanized Areas for each State, a total of 320 Urbanized areas
were defined for estimation of Category V and VI needs.
The Urbanized Area Data Base consists primarily of the following items, some
of which were obtained from the National Combined Sewer System Data File and
the remainder from other published sources:
1. Demographic Data. The items in this category are the combined sewer
service area and the population served by combined sewers, the Urbanized
Area population and size, the year 1970 SMSA population, the year 2000
SMSA population estimate, and the citywide EPA construction cost factor.
2. Hydrologic Data. The items in this category are the number of days with
rain per year, the mean annual rainfall, the receiving water
classification, the mean annual flow of the receiving water, and the
natural runoff coefficient.
3. Water Quality Data. The items in this category are maximum monthly
receiving water temperature, background BOD, Solids, lead, hardness,
alkalinity, and pH of the receiving water.
SOURCES OF DATA
Sources of data for the National Combined Sewer System Data File included
the following:
1. NPDES files in EPA Regional offices.
2. USGS water resources data.
3. Grants files.
4. 201 plans.
174
-------
5. 208 plans.
6. Telephone contact with municipalities.
Sources of data for the Urbanized Area Data Base are given as follows:
1. Demographic Data.
a. The combined sewer service area and the population served by the
combined sewers were taken from the National Combined Sewer System
Data File for those systems located within Urbanized Areas.
b. Urbanized Area population and size were reported in the
supplementary report of the 1970 census of population (2).
c. 1970 SMSA population was reported in the "Current Population Reports
Series" (3).
d. Year 2000 SMSA population estimates were reported from the U.S.
Water Resources Council's OBERS Projections (4).
e. Citywide EPA construction cost factors were taken from EPA Municipal
Construction Cost Index map, wastewater treatment plants, and City
multipliers.
2. Hydrologic Data.
a. The number of days with rain per year arid the mean annual rainfall
were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (5).
b. Receiving water data were obtained from the National Combined Sewer
System Data File and from USGS Water Resources data.
c. Natural runoff coefficients were obtained from USGS Water Supply
Paper 1797 - "Has the United States Enough Water?" (6).
3. Water Quality Data. Background water quality data were obtained from
the Assessment of Water Pollution from Nonpoint Sources (7).
175
-------
REFERENCES
1. Federal Register, 40 CFR Parts 124, 125, National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System - Separate Storm Sewers, Final Regulations. 18 March
2. Supplemental Report, 1970 Census of Population, PC (S7)-106. Population
of Urbanized Areas Established in the 1970 Census for the United States.
1970.
3. Population Estimates and Projections, P-25, No. 709. Estimates of the
Population of Counties and Metropolitan Areas. 1 July 1974 and 1975.
4. U.S. Water Resources Council, 1972, OBERS Projections of Economic
Activity in the U.S., Volume IV - States, Volume V - Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Washington, D.C.
5. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, "Water Resources
Data for the United States." Published annually for each State.
6. Piper, A. M. "Has the United States Enough Water?" U.S. Geological
Survey Water Supply Paper 1797. U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C.
7. McElroy, A. D., et.al. "Loading Functions for Assessment of Water
Pollution from Nonpoint Sources," EPA 600/2-76/151. May 1976.
176
-------
APPENDIX C
THE 1982 NEEDS SURVEY
DESCRIPTION OF THE 1982 SURVEY FORM
The principal instrument of the 1982 Needs Survey was the EPA-1 form shown
on Figures C.I and C.2. The updated 1980 Survey data of record were printed
on this form and copies distributed to cognizant Federal, State, and
contractor personnel. One form was completed for each facility identified
in the 1980 Needs Survey. The data of record were then updated in
accordance with the methodology presented in Appendix A.
The form is designed to allow a large quantity of data to be compiled for
each sewerage facility. This is made possible by an elaborate data coding
system which allows a huge quantity of data to be entered in a compact form
and permits it to be easily checked by computer for accuracy and
completeness. The codes used to complete each item on the form (Figure C.I)
are defined on the reverse side of the form (Figure C.2).
Listed below is a brief explanation of each item on the 1982 Needs Survey
EPA-1 form:
1. State/Authority/Facility Number: This is a discrete nine digit number
assignedto eachfacility.The first two digits designate a
particular State or Territory and are obtained from the Federal
Information Processing Standard for designating States and outlying
areas of the U.S. (FIPS-5).
The next four numbers designate a particular municipal sewerage
authority and are assigned sequentially by each State. The last three
digits designate a particular sewerage facility and are assigned
sequentially by each municipal sewerage authority.
2. Facility Name: The official name of the facility.
3. Authority Name: The name of the authority having responsibility for
the facility.
4. Zip Code: The official postal service zip code of the facility.
5. Submission Code: This is a one digit number which indicates whether
the need of the facility changed since the 1980 Survey, or whether
the facility was even included in the 1980 Survey.
6. Stream Use: One to three stream use classification codes are entered
in this block corresponding to the stream receiving the municipal
wastewater discharge. The stream use codes are matched to
classifications designated by the State.
7. Eligibility; An "X" in the first block indicates that the facility is
eligible for Farmers Home Administration financial assistance. An "X"
in the second block indicates that the facility is eligible for
Economic Development Administration financial assistance. A "Y" or
177
-------
""
N" for yes or no in the third block indicates if funding for the
facility has been provided under the Clean Water Act. A "Y" or "N" in
the fourth block of Item 7 indicates if pretreatment of industrial
flow is required for this facility.
8. NPDES NUMBER; The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit number assigned to the facility through the EPA permit
program.
9. County Number: The three digit FIPS-6 number used to identify the
county in which the facility is located.
10. SMSA Number; The number of the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area
(SMSA) in which the facility is located.
11. Reach Number; A number designating the river reach in which the
facility discharges according to nationwide stream segment
classifications developed by EPA.
12- Congressional District: The number of the Congressional district in
which the facility is located.
13. Comment Codes; Four spaces are provided for one digit codes which
represent standardized comments that explain anomalies present in the
coding convention used to describe the facility. The standard
comments are listed on the reverse side of the form. Space is also
provided on the reverse side for writing more extensive comments.
14. City: The name of the community in which the facility is located.
15. County; The name of the county in which the facility is located.
16a. Facility Status; A one digit code which indicates whether or not a
facility is currently in operation.
16b. Present Nature of Facility: A one digit code which describes the
present type of facility in operation. The codes are defined on the
reverse side of the form.
16c. Projected Nature of Facility: A one digit code which describes the
type of facility projected to be in operation in 2000. The codes are
defined on the reverse side of the form.
16d- Projected Change: A one digit code which describes any physical
changes expected at the facility by 2000. The codes are defined on
the reverse side of the form.
16e. Start Up Date; The month and year a facility became, or is expected
to become, operational.
16f. Abandonment Date: The month and year a facility will be abandoned, if
applicable.
178
-------
17. Summary of Category Needs: This section is used to record the costs
of Categories I-IVB. Column (a) is for the EPA assessment. Column
(b) is for the State assessment, if different from (a). Column (c) is
the portion required to satisfy backlog facility requirements.
Backlog refers to the facility requirements based on the 1980
population rather than the 2000 population. Column (d) is used to
record the basis of estimation for the dollar amounts recorded in
Column (a). Column (e) is used to record the reason the State
submitted a separate State estimate in Column (b), if applicable. The
codes for the basis of estimation used in Columns (d) and (e) are
defined on the reverse side of the form.
18. Facility Population: This section shows the population which receives
treatment and/or collection by the facility. Collection and treatment
populations are further categorized as follows: present residents,
present nonresidents, projected residents, and projected nonresidents.
19. Need for New Collectors, Interceptors. Force Mains, and Pumping
Stations: This section lists codes for required new collectors,
interceptors, outfalls, force mains, and pumping stations and their
costs. The diameter of the pipe is shown in inches. The capacity of
pumping stations is shown in million gallons per day (mgd).
20. Disposal of Liquid Effluents: A one digit code is entered in each of
the three Columns (a, b, and c) to describe the method(s) of effluent
disposal used by the facility. The code in Column (a) describes the
method. The code in Column (b) describes the operational status. The
code in Column (c) describes the expected physical change. All codes
are defined on the reverse side of the form.
21. Required Infiltration/Inflow Corrective Action: A one digit code
indicating the required action to eliminate excessive I/I, if
applicable.
22. Estimated I/I Flow: The quantity of I/I flow (mgd) to be eliminated
by the corrective action indicated in Item 21.
23. Major Rehabilitation/Replacement Required: A one digit code for the
type of corrective action required to accomplish major rehabilitation
or replacement of a portion of a sewerage system, if applicable.
24. Do Wastewaters Originate in Communities Existing Before October 18,
1972?: This item is self-explanatory and is answered yes or no.
25. 1972 Collection Population: The resident population in existence in
1972 which still requires new collector sewers.
26. Effluent Characteristics: A one digit code indicating the present and
future effluent characteristics (primary, secondary, etc.) a facility
is designed to produce.
27. Reasons: A one digit code indicating the reason for any facility
being designed to achieve a greater than secondary level of treatment.
179
-------
28. Supplemental Sheets: A one digit code indicating the use of an
additional data collection sheet to list specialized information about
the facility.
29. Flows, Concentrations, Monthly Average: This section is used for
compiling information on the present performance and design values for
treatment facilities. Listed are the monthly averages for various
parameters according to the existing actual performance, the present
design, and the projected design. Data are compiled for the following
parameters (if applicable): Total flow (mgd); total industrial flow
(mgd); domestic flow per capita (gallons per day); and influent and
effluent concentrations of five day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5),
suspended solids (Solids), phosphorus, and ammonia.
30. Other: A three digit code is used in Item 30a to indicate the
presence of up to six known toxics in the influent to a treatment
facility. The codes for toxics are listed in the technical guidance
document. Similar codes are entered in Item 30b for toxics projected
to be in the influent in the future.
31a. Receives Discharge From: If the facility receives flows from another
facility, the authority/facility number of the other facility is
entered in item 31a.
31b. Discharges To: If the facility discharges flows to another facility,
the authority/facility number of the other facility is entered in item
31b.
32. Treatment and Sludge Handling: This section is used to compile
information about the unit processes at the facility. An appropriate
code is entered in each of the three Columns (a, b, and c) to describe
a particular unit process. The code in Column (a) describes the
process. The code in Column (b) describes the operational status of
the process. The code in Column (c) describes the expected physical
change to the process. All codes are listed on the reverse side of
the form.
180
-------
FIGURE C.I
.»».., EPA-I ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
"-" ESTIMATE OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
This report is required by lav/ (33 U S.C. 1251 ET SEQ). While you are not required to respond, your
cooperation is needed to make the results ol tins survey comprehensive, accurate, and timely.
O.M.B. Ho. 2000-0034
Approval Erpires February 2B, 1984
1. Sulc /Auilionly/'F.ic. Uo.
6. SliCMLSe
2. Fjcihly iiD.ne
7. Eligbilily
FmHA
PL Pie-
ICE. ] 92-500 | ticat
14. Cily
17. SUMMARY OF CATEGORY NEEDS
8. NPOES No.
IS. County name
3. Authority 11,11110
9. County
10. SUSA
15a. Fac.
sin us
Category
DA
DB
00
IUA
raa
DTA
JSB
Cost of record
tBil. Mil., Trtou.;
(1)
12)
IS)
10
New and 'or revised cos
(til'. 'AM IThou.)
Ib)
Portion required to
satisfy backlog
IBil.iMil./Thoti.)
1C)
for sep
8 FACILITY POPULATION
RCV.
TREATMENT
NO
TREATMENT
RCV.
COLLECTION
PIC-.CIII icsulenl Present nonresident PrO|. resident Pio|. nonresident
Ul L . lbl (c) Id)
11. Reach No.
b. Nat.
picscut
C. Nat.
IIIOj.
4. ZIP
12.CoiiE.
dist.
I.CImj.
5 Siil
(.ode
13. Comment coitcs
e. Dale
stail-up
1. Dale
19. NEED FOR NEW COLLECTORS, INTERCEPTORS,
FORCE MAINS. AND PUMPING STATIONS
Type
(1)
(2)
(11)
(12)
III i.ibcr
Ibl
Hi.DlS osAL
OF LIQUID
EFFLUENTS
CODES
Disp.
(a)
ChnR.
Ic)
Leiiiilli tit i
Capacity (AfGOJ
1C)
TO7T
Cost
(Btl.tMil ' Tltoti.t
(d
22. Est. I/I flow
23. Maj. ichab./
fcp. required
Code
24. Do was ewalcfsori-
gin.ilc in coinmimi-
ucs ems ing bulore
October 18. 19/27
2S. 1972 population requiring collection
26. Elfluent characteristic
27. Reasons
28. Supplemental sheets
29. FLOWS CONCENTRATIONS, MONTHLY AVERAGE
TOTAL
FLOW
[MODI
INDUS.
FLOW
OOM.
FLOW/CAP
IGPCOI
BODs
ling, It
sus.
SOLIDS
fiag -If
PHOS-
PHORUS
AMMONIA
imam
30a. DESIGN
OTHER
b. PROJ.
OTHER
(CutJti)
Existing
(a
(1)
(2)
(4)
(1)
(1)
(2)
Present design
It)
13)
(3)
31a. Receive
discharge
Irani
JlL
Projected desrgii
1C
(6)
Discharges
to
32 TREATMENT AND SLUDGE HANDLING ccocfes)
(5)
(t)
Use
32 TREATMENT
AND SLUDGE
HANDLING
Continued
(9)
110)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(17)
(U)
IOT RCV.
COLLECTION
WORKSHEET COMPLETED BY
ACCEPTANCE
STATE AGENCY
EPA REGIONAL OFFICE
Chile Su'n.iltiro
NOTC limlc.Ho revised lltjuios In ,i/>/>ro/>r/,if« sliadift .1/0,15
AiiUi'jlily .mil l.inhty nijiiili^'l
-------
CODE REFERENCE CHART
G- Submission Cork-s
- No (.h ..... l- lunn 1080
- Fjtitiiy not lo-po-H-tl m 1980
- Cli..iiO-' Ironi 1900
6 - Stro.nn use Codt-'i
A.|u.iiir. f ish .iii.I Wildhlu Supp
03 U'jini wjti'i
06 - C.ilil \\jur
OR -- Sli-Iltoh pioiiHThon
0«) - Si.ifun.il
I l.iwiloi Mi-bin- w-tt'f iupply
- A. ri.citliui.it
42 -- f ull body contact
44 P,,r|,,i! Imdy conl.i
46 - Mr>n LUOUH I
49 - Si isonuf
13 - Commi-m Codes
-- Pa. k.n)i pi. ml lot f x,i<
ov.»ljl>le
fc xi', t ii it) plant lias t.-x
?000popui.iuon
itutn-d cor>actty is no!
cj|urny n-jw to treat
\O
d>)oiht.T f.it iNty
Rt>ruitfif (tow Ironi oihor municipal f^cililydcs)
FI.H-, div.Mt.-n t.j othiT n>unu-ip,)i f.iLttiiy |fs)
FU>ceivi> flOA- (.0111 olhi:r non municipal f.icilnydei)
OO
PO
Additiunal comment* cm lonn
lu-m IGj - facility Status
1 - Inopci.tin.n
2 - Not in oiierjiion
Item Utti, ICc - Nature of Facility
1 - A iutnpii-i<> v- .iti'w.ih-r in\iimi.-ni sysu-m (mcludcf a
tn.itntfi.l I.I^MI. wuh I»IK tdU'tf roHi-cior .ind/Or
tnlL-ici'pIix ti >v..ift, jiul rinjlVioth tot Utipos.it ot
L'KKn ni. uiitL'f control ill Hit.- «inK- tft'Jtniu'iit
.iiiitioiny) ^ith conihinul M-wtfi Code "A" for
inii-riui iiL^uncni plum
2- A Cdiiiftli'li w,un.-vviiL-r irod'iui nt iyst'-'m (mctudci
a ttejii>i*rii ptjui. wuu .tsvoctaud civllccior and/Of
intciCL'piui si-wcis, and mi'ihixh for dti|>os.il of
i-flu.L-Mi. u.Mlot coiitiol o» ihu i.ime tn-.itmrnt
otiil.oHiyl v\nh s.'D.n.iti: fetntfit CcfhJ "8" '01 interim
lM.tlin..ril i.ljnt
3 _ A i.>[»,iijtp treatment plant (The sewers which
UtscMjri|.» to it-is plant aru- under thu corilrol of one or
rttoie difft-fcnl ji-ihorniet, t Code "C" for interim
lii-.,ti(ii-nl
4- A up. r.ne niiiniCti.jl wjiicwaief colic* non system
(Includ* > one or mntfe connect t'd collvclor and/or
iiili'iioptor SLwvfS. forte mams, pumping stdtioiis,
t-tc , i.l.iLh dtl.cr ,wii )
5 A itf iii.ni coin htiicd tikvi-r syticm (Includes one or
mnri? ir icirOMin-cH d n .vt'rs wh« I) Citify hoih sxitiary
wa>'vr 10 a f,,otny otwtntod
hy .iO(,itn r ;uilhorttv tl IdCihly includes tmili
ti-pjr^ti' ijiiiiiiiy ^frttr* .ind (.cnilmied >'-vvcfj, report
6 - Otlui
7 A s\ in*m for the hulk u.insni niton ol vwjstewdter with
or wilMout pumpiiMj stations, and wuh or without
iiiij f^i times, iticludirK) vehicles or vehicle
Items 16d, 20c. and 3?c - Projected Change
1 - F.Hl.iri|t-
2 - Uporjde
3 - Et'lJi'jL- and upgrade
4 - Inii.tlt m new pi.mi
5 - (U-pl.tLP
G - Ati.indon
7 No change
8 - Other
9 -- Ahandon treatment plant, retain seweri
Item 17d - Basil of Estimate
1 - Suile (k-il>fplted cost esttrndting procedures
8 Cost elioctive analysis (unanprovcd 1nci1niei plan!
9 Other preliminary csiiinatc-s
A- Grdin .iwjrd (uliills otl needs
B - Gtant jvw.iid fuldlls p.in.iit ncctts
C St.iiu supphpctcosi estimatintj procedures
hum 17o - RCJ-.OMS for Separate State Estimates
1 ~ Sun- used lucdlly or n.-lI du«jl(jp«-d Lust Curves or
cost estimating procedure
2 - State estimates based on larger projected per capita
flow
3 Stale disagreement with selected collection /treatment
alternatives
4 State estimate submit Ted without adequate docu-
mentation
5 States estimates based on incomplete or undpprovcd
eivjmi'ei ir\g tcporti
G Stdlc population projections differ from allowable
coilimjs or reports
7 Other (Evpfotn on reverse side of EPA-1 form in
comment* section)
Item 19a - New CoUfcton, Interceptors, Fotc« Mafnt,
and Pumping Stations
CS Collector sewers
IS Interceptor sewers
FM - Force M.nn
PS - PumpMiy Smton
FF- Ouifall seivers
SF Ocuan outlall sewers
ttom 20» - Duposal of Liquid Effluents
1 Out Kill to suifdce waters
2 - OeCiii> owl Ml
3 Ground waicr recharge
4 - Otlur lutid disposal
5 - Recycling and reuse
6 - Septic (ank field
7 - Other
8 No discharge
9 - Spuv irrnjjtiofl
A - Uiich u«itj.)lion
B To other was it water treatment plant
Hams 2()b anri 32b - Use codes
1 - Now in u«
2 - Under (.onstruclion or provided for in approved grant
3 - flfuiutriHl, but not yet approved or funded
4 - Not appln-dhto
5 - Insulted but not tn use
hum 21 (I/O and Item 23 (Major Rehab.l Corrective Action
1 Not known at this time
2 - None
3 - Sejl off sf-wer lines
4 _ nupljcciTCitne sc^N«^ section*
5 - Ch,-myc/cicjte flow routing system
6 - Provide ffowe<|uali£.tnon
7 Oihtf tonet-tiVL- actions
Item 2G - Characteristic of Effluent
0 - No disch
1 R jw diji-horge
2 Primary
nt Morn Stringent than
FIGURE C.2
1 1. -in 2(> - Continued
Ii Ailv.inri'tt bi'iitiiiltiry
G- l.iu.rv
Hum 27 - Itcwm l«r 1
S 110 ni 'it v
0 - A wan-t *(u..liiv I'Ltn winch hdi been oppiovt-d by EPA
1 - Ord-r of St ..... Lttun
2 Order of J-.tle/.,l C'.un
3 - Sl..l«. i» time u. iM.-m.-
4 - Nl'UrSp.-i.niir.. IMIIIW
0 - Sun- . nfi>.< in-lit ouli-r m pitxt-cd'ii<|
G - r»I.-rjl L-iiliio-iiiriit urdu i or ptucd-dmg
7 - Vnlunt.irv .in-iimm wtiu.li irnJutirs u schedule of
rm H| il MI m. 01 ri.piuvi i MCI 1 1.1
8 - Oih.-i
9 - A M infiiMiiun hy Hie Si.ile that the body of waier
Hcoviny It.,-, diM.-li.irye i» w.,lcr <|ud1.ty dependent.
.nid lh.il mini Mri.niciit iHMimcnt ti fi'jcduil lo i
hem 28 - S.tpi.l. niciil.il &he«»
1 - ro,.»/. «" u» .iiiiu-iiis
3 - fiidif,in,.l COM fcxtluvion
horn 30 Code*, 01. Suppleim.-nt.il Shout
Item 37a - Trr^tmt-nt .md Sludge H.iiufhng
LIQUID TMEATMbNT PHOCfc'SSES
Primary Trc.itinonl
02 - Preliminary rn-jimeni bar screen
04 - pic'liimnai y lit dlmc-nt commmuiors
Ob - Pn.-Ntmn.iiy tiedimuit -othus
UQ - Scum rrnmv.il
07 _ flow c(|iiff - sccond.iiv
20 - S.iiulMiiis
JO - Mix rn.-dio hhers (sjnd and coaO
31 - Oilier t nons
32 -- AcitvdtL-d t jibon yianuUu
33 - ActivateJ c.tftKirt - pci-Aik-rud
34 - TV'O st.njf Iune tie.iunt nl ul raw waftewater
30 _ Stnqto ->i.»je lime iif.innrni ol r.iw wasiewaOr
37 S"i't'(I st^jn miury lmn; lio.iimoni
39 NL-uifiil'7Jiion
40 Alum u.lii to primary
idi lor
43 - Fern ch!f>nd» addition to primary
44 - fun r I.KJM*',- .iildiiicm lo si-concl.iry
45 - r> 'cni (30/
sti.oi.djry)
57 btrifiTli/atton iionds
60 - Ouil.ill ililfus> r
61 " Ctfturnt to other plants
63 - OHwr Vo-.umv.u
SLUDGC PROCESSES
65 - Aorohu digestion air
60- Aerobic dttjcsiton ~ oxvqen
G7 Composiing
08 - Anaerobic digestion
G9 Sluijt]e NiijHOns
70 - Hi-.it ttuatmcnt
71 - Ctilotiop otc«tdtionol sludye (Puttfaxl
72 - Lime stabilization
73 - Wet
-------
APPENDIX D
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM WORKSHEET
The combined sewer system worksheet is supplemental to the EPA-1 form
described in Appendix C for those facilities known to be served by combined
sewers. Since combined sewers provide both urban drainage and wastewater
conveyance, they may not always be defined on an individual
facility-by-facility basis. For the purposes of the Needs Survey, a
separate worksheet was completed for each combined sewer system/major
receiving water configuration. Thus, a single worksheet may consider more
than one combined sewer network, i.e., facility, if the networks are
adjacent and discharge to the same major receiving water. A single
worksheet may also consider a number of facilities which are included in a
single, comprehensive CSO planning document.
The definition of a major receiving water is somewhat subjective. However,
an attempt was made to define a receiving water as objectively as possible'
In general, an urban receiving stream was considered to be a major receiving
water if it was known to be a continuously flowing water body which could
become fishable and swimmable after providing adequate control of CSO and/or
other pollution sources. Streams which were wholly within a combined sewer
watershed were not considered major receiving waters. On the other hand,
streams draining a significant watershed area upstream from the combined
sewer area were considered major receiving waters.
The 1982 combined sewer system worksheet is illustrated on Figure D.I.
Listed below is a brief explanation of each item on that worksheet.
SECTION 1 - IDENTIFICATION OF COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM DATA
Section 1 of the worksheet provides identification and descriptive data on
the combined sewer system. A description of each item in Section 1 is given
below: y
l- Authority/Facility Number. The authority/facility (A/F) number is
defined in the guidance for Categories I-IV. The number reported in
this item is for the major facility serving the combined sewer system
If more than one facility was involved, the additional A/F numbers are
found under Item 15.
2. Authority Name. The authority name is the official name of the
authority with major responsibility for operation of the combined sewer
system.
3- State. County. Place. The state, county, place code is defined in the
guidance for Categories I-IV. This code applies to the facility
reported in Item 1. *
4. SMSA Number. Those combined sewer systems located at least in part
within a Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) as defined by
the U.S. Census Bureau are reported by SMSA number in this item.
183
-------
5. Basin. The basin code is defined in the guidance for Categories I-IV.
This code applies to the location of the combined sewer system.
6. Congressional District. The number of the Congressional district(s)
(three maximum) which are served by the combined sewer system.
7. City Name. The city name is the official name of the city or town
served by the combined sewer system.
8. County Name. The county name is the official name of the county, or
county equivalent, in which the major portion of the combined sewer
system is located.
9. Drainage Area. The area, in acres, drained directly by the combined
sewer system which is tributary to the subject receiving water.
10. Separate Sewer Area. This is the area, in acres, served by separate
sanitary sewers which discharge directly into the combined sewer
system. Codes for Item 10 are as follows:
0 - No information presently available.
1 - Some separate sanitary sewers are connected; however, the area is
unknown.
2 - Area is known and is reported.
A code of 2 and a reported area of 0.0 means that no separate sanitary
sewers discharge directly into the combined sewer system.
11. Population Served. The total number of persons resident to the area
drained directly by the combined sewer system defined in Items 9 and
10.
12. Sewer Length. The total length of combined sewer, in feet, tributary
to the subject receiving water.
13. Number of CSO Points. This is the number of points at which the
combined wastewater/stormwater is discharged from the collection system
directly into the receiving water during periods of high flow.
14. Population Equivalent. This is the dry-weather flow population
equivalent for the combined sewer area defined on a BOD,- basis and
includes the resident population (Item 11), commercial contribution,
existing industrial contribution, and transient population.
15. Additional Authority/Facility Number(s). Since combined sewer systems
may be defined using hydrologic or previous planning considerations,
data for several treatment facilities may be reported on one worksheet.
This item reports all authority/facility numbers which are associated
with the major facility serving a combined sewer system.
184
-------
16. Local Contact. This item identifies the name, title, address and
t°nco:bteedr s^MiV0* °ff1Clal a
SECTION 2 - RECEIVING WATER CHARACTERISTICS
18/19in HeanlAnn"al1 "ow aid 7/0/10. The average flow rate and 7-dav
ss'OTisre^^
information was obtained from U.S. Geological Survey records nearest
0 - Flow rate not applicable, e.g., lake.
1 - Flow rate measured at USGS gauge.
2 - Flow rate estimated from regional relationship.
20< Rece1vin3 ^ter Classification. The purpose of the receivinq water
classification is to describe the general characteristicsofthe
wateTYn9 oTnf i< verbal fdesc^Ption is used to place the receiving
?nd/nr v«?nr-t seP^ate categories. Values and ranges of depth
and/or velocity are given on the following code reference chart
end t' velocities are mean values and apply to mean, flow
Receiving water classification codes:
1 - Creeks and shallow streams [depth(d) <2 feet].
2 - Upstream feeders (230 feet).
7 - Small ponds, backwaters.
8 - Lakes.
9 - Shallow high tidal velocity estuary or bay (depth <10 feet; V >i.s
185
-------
10 - Shallow low tidal velocity estuary or bay (depth <10 feet; V<1.5
fps).
11 - Medium depth, high tidal velocity estuary or bay (depth = 10 to 30
feet; V>1.5 fps).
12 - Medium depth, low tidal velocity estuary or bay (depth = 10 to 30
feet; V<1.5 fps).
13 - Deep, high tidal velocity estuary or bay (depth >30 feet; V>1.5
fps).
14 - Deep, low tidal velocity estuary or bay (depth>30 feet; V<1.5
fps).
15 - Open ocean or beach.
21. Known Reaeration Coefficient. If a reaeration rate for the subject
receiving water has been measured, the value and the flow rate at which
the measurement was made are recorded. Units of the reaeration rate
are per day base e.
22. Channel Slope. This is the approximate receiving stream slope,
reported in feet per mile, and in general was estimated from USGS
topographic maps. This item applies only to free-flowing streams
(receiving water classification 1 through 5) and is not reported if
Item 21 is completed.
23. Receiving Water Background Quality. These background quality data
correspond to upstream flow of the major receiving water prior to
inflow from the combined sewer system. .USGS water quality records may
have been a source for this information. Data on the following
parameters are recorded:
Maximum mean monthly temperature in °C (generally occurs in July or
August).
Average BODr concentration in mg/1.
Average Solids concentration in mg/1.
Average fecal coliform concentration in MPN/100 ml.
24. USGS Gauge Number. If receiving water flow estimates reported in Items
18 and 19 were derived directly from USGS flow records, the station
identification number is recorded here.
25. Type of Aquatic Life. The type of aquatic life which could reasonably
be supportedunder unpolluted or uncontaminated conditions in the
receiving water downstream from the combined sewer system is recorded
using codes defined as follows:
186
-------
1 - Cold freshwater fishery, e.g., trout.
2 - Cold freshwater nursery or breeding area.
3 - Warm freshwater fishery, e.g., black bass.
4 - Warm freshwater nursery or breeding area.
5 - Estuary nonshellfish waters.
6 - Estuary shellfish waters.
7 - Open ocean.
26. Known CSO Problems. Water quality problems associated with the
receiving water downstream from the combined sewer area which are known
to be caused at least in part by combined sewer overflow are recorded
using the following codes:
0 - No known problems.
1 - Aesthetic degradation.
2 - High suspended solids levels.
3 - Low dissolved oxygen levels.
4 - Bacteriological contamination.
5 - Sludge deposits.
6 - Toxic conditions.
7 - Fishkills.
8 - Eutrophication (nutrients).
9 - Other, see comments.
Up to four known CSO problems can be recorded in decreasing order of
severity.
SECTION 3 - STATUS OF CSO ABATEMENT PROJECTS
A major emphasis of the 1982 Needs Survey was to identify those
municipalities which had conducted CSO planning. If CSO planning was
completed, the objective was to determine compliance with EPA Program
Requirements Memoranda PRM 75-34 and PRM 77-4. Data on the status of CSO
abatement projects were recorded in Section 3. A description of each item
is given below:
27. Overall Status. The overall status of CSO abatement projects for the
combined sewer system described on a given worksheet was designated
using the following codes:
187
-------
1 - Planning not yet begun.
2 - Ongoing 208.
3 - Draft 208.
4 - Completed 208.
5 - Ongoing 201 (Step 1).
6 - Draft 201.
7 - Completed 201.
8 - Ongoing CSO planning, non-EPA funded.
9 - Draft CSO planning, non-EPA funded.
10 - Completed CSO planning, non-EPA funded.
11 - Ongoing design (Step 2).
12 - Completed design.
13 - Construction in progress.
14 - Construction complete.
More than one code may apply to any given facility. For example, a
facility may have been included in a completed 208 (Code 4) and is
currently being studied by an ongoing 201 (Code 5).
?R rnmoletion Dates For each of the codes entered above, the actual or
expected complet on dates were recorded in Item 28 In the case where
CSO planning has not yet begun (Code 1, Item 27), the date reported was
the anticipated starting date of CSO planning.
?9 Planning and PRM 75-34. To determine if current CSO facility planning
29' was complete comprehensive, and consistent with ^ requirements of
PRM 715-34 the following points were considered when a Code 3,4, b, or
7 was entered under Uem 27. If the following items were considered, a
Code 1 (Yes) was entered for each point. It it was not considered, a
Code 2 (no) was entered. Items b, f, and g reflect criteria which are
specifically required by PRM 75-34.
a. Receiving water quality objectives were defined.
h Rpsidual water quality problems were identified, i.e., the
existence of a receiving water quality problem after achievement
of the secondary treatment requirement was established.
c. Pollutant removal requirements were estimated.
d. Alternate CSO control techniques were identified.
188
-------
e. A cost effective mix of CSO alternatives was considered.
f. A cost effective mix of CSO, AST, AT, and/or other control
measures was considered.
g. Marginal costs were determined not to be substantially greater
than marginal benefits for the proposed solution.
30- Multipurpose Projects. The objective of Item 30 was to determine if a
CSO project has purposes other than pollution control, e.g., flood
control or drainage. The results of Item 30 were reported for the
following three points by using a Code 1 if the point was affirmative
(yes) and a Code 2 if the point was negative (no).
a. Does the CSO abatement project have purposes other than pollution
control, e.g., flood control or drainage?
b. Was the cost allocated to CSO pollution control determined by the
alternative justifiable expenditure (AJE) method?
c. Is the cost allocated to CSO pollution control less than or equal
to the least cost single purpose CSO pollution control
alternative?
31. Proposed Solutions. If Codes 3, 5, 6, or 7 were entered under Item 27
and if the resulting draft or completed documents were available for
review, the proposed solutions for control of CSO (five maximum) were
reported using the following codes:
1. Sewer separation.
2. In-system storage with additional treatment capacity.
3. In-system storage with realtime control and additional treatment
capacity.
4. Earthen basin storage with additional treatment capacity.
5. Concrete (uncovered) basin storage with additional treatment
capacity.
6. Concrete (covered) basin storage with additional treatment
capacity.
7. Mined storage, e.g., deep tunnels, with or without additional
treatment capacity.
8. High rate treatment without storage, e.g., swirl concentrator,
screening, etc.
9. In-system storage without additional treatment capacity.
10. In-system storage with realtime control and without additional
treatment capacity.
189
-------
11. Surface water interception/storage/diversion scheme, i.e., runoff
diverted before entering a combined sewer system.
12. Sewer flushing.
13. Catch basin cleaning.
14. Streetsweeping.
15. Other, see comments.
20. Cost effective mix of CSO alternatives.
21. Cost effective mix of CSO, AST, AT, and/or other control measures.
SECTION 4 - GRANT INFORMATION
32. Grant Numbers. Grant numbers, if any, which provide Federal
construction grant funds for CSO control (Category V) were entered
here.
SECTION 5 - GRANT ELIGIBLE COST ESTIMATES
33. Cost Estimates. For each of the proposed CSO solutions identified in
Item 31, a cost estimate was entered, when available, along with the
month and year used to establish the value of money when the estimate
was made.
The following codes were used for reporting cost estimates of proposed
solutions:
1. Sewer separation.
2. In-system storage with additional treatment capacity.
3. In-system storage with realtime control and additional treatment
capacity.
4. Earthen basin storage with additional treatment capacity.
5. Concrete (uncovered) basin storage with additional treatment
capacity.
6. Concrete (covered) basin storage with additional treatment
capacity.
7. Mined storage, e.g., deep tunnels, with or without additional
treatment capacity.
8. High rate treatment without storage, e.g., swirl concentrator,
screening, etc.
9. In-system storage without additional treatment capacity.
190
-------
*ic;
10. In-system storage with realtime control and without additional
treatment capacity.
11. Surface water interception/storage/diversion scheme, i.e., runoff
diverted before entering a combined sewer system.
12. Sewer flushing.
13. Catch basin cleaning.
14. Streetsweeping.
15. Other, see comments.
19. State supplied (separate) estimate.
20. Cost effective mix of CSO alternative.
21. Cost effective mix of CSO, AST, AT, and/or other control measures.
22' P^l!eti?MrD0«bAeC?iVe'-,e^imated Us1n9 the 1982 Needs Estimation
Program (NEP82) described in Appendix B.
23. Fish and Wildlife objective, estimated using NEP82 described in
Appendix B.
24. Recreation objective, estimated using NEP82 described in Appendix
D
25. Sewer separation, estimated using NEP82 described in Appendix B.
26. Needs previously met.
27. Needs reported to Congress.
191
-------
u
- * *
z * to *
U * LJ *
c * > *
x: * * *
o
u
en tn
L- U.
u o
TC.
O
o
tn i
u !
t-
to
Ci
LJ
t-
U
X
Ci
- *
LJ *
^> *
to *
*
LI *
LJ *
LJ *
Z *
*
IN *
CO *
e> *
*
LJ *
_> *
U_ *
U
y
Ci
Ci
LJ
^_
UJ
ej
LJ
ff
1-1
LJ
Ci
0
ej
3
O
LL
5
z
-
n
LJ
CL
0
to
z
z
-
1- X
i-i 1- if>
r>
§
o
LL
i i
J
o
ej
_i
Z>
a.
i
O
M
o
x:
tn
o
u
z tn
a o a. i- ui
_l M UJ !tl iZ
M (- U5 Z O
3 0
(J CI M C4 f4
******
******
o
TC
I-
01
O
u
tn
u
X
t-
tn
LU
* *
* x: *
* LJ *
* 1- *
* en *
* >~ *
* en *
* *
ML rr *
* LJ *
* 3 *
* UJ *
* *
* UJ *
* z *
* t-l *
* » *
* 0 *
* 0 -»f
* * *
* * * "
>- *
cs *
S5 *
Zi *
! *
->--" 1-
1- 1- O W
M >-i Q O M
CC Li X Z Q
O O LJ Z
X X 1- ^>
tn
|;|
u
«
tn LL
LJ
Ci
u
- LJ CO -z- Z
Z-C 1-0
<£ f-1. h- n X
Z i- CI U LL
1-
o
LJ
Ci
LL
to
I
in LJ
IN
:c
Ci d
CL
Z U
to j
1 1
z.
U U
O
* *
IN CO
IN f-J
tn i
Ci !
« i
o
u
******
******
Z !
ZJ
! ^"*
------- |