-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
1-5 REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMONSTRATING METHOD ACCEPTABILITY EQR VOC ANALYSIS
' FROM CANISTERS 7^
There are three performance criteria which
laboratory to demonstrate that its analysis raeth
successfully perform VOC analysis on air sampl
established for: the method detection limit,
audit accuracy. These criteria are a detect
replicate precision within 25%, and audit a
concentrations normally expected in ambien
each compound on the Target Compound List
ing laboratories. These criteria were e^ta
from the Toxics Air Monitoring Syst
Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP) ne
the acceptability of analysis method/on
be met for a
choice can
ia are
.sion, and
imit
.cy within
Specific criteria
currently being used for the analysi
VOCs in air. Essentially these analyire of^reoisi/n used for this program is the unsigned
relative differenfcebetv>4en/replicate measurements of the same sample
expressed as a percentage ix> [(Measurement #1 - Measurement #2) x 100
percent] /_AxerAge. Theffexare>everal factors which may affect the
precisiorKbf the mea^iremenb^TheSnature of the compound of interest
itself Edayh*VE-~-sMcatexcalibratic/n simples at the 10 ppbv level. A more
conservative measure w/s obtained from replicate analysis of "real
world" canis>&rsam>i/s firom the TAMS and UATMP networks. These data
are given in TabTreD/VC/5. The information presented in Table D/VC-5
Juli
Page D - 29/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
was used to determine the replicate precision value
goal to be achieved for each of the target compoun
1.5.3 Audit Accuracy
1.5.3.1 A measure of analytical accuracy is
with audit standards. Audit accuracy is defi
difference between the measurement result
of the audit compound;
Audit Accuracy, % = Spiked Value -
5 percent as a
Spikep
on
- D/VOA-8
lue
1.5.3.2 Audit standards will be supp/Lie4 to the,
laboratories, these audit standards
obtain audit accuracy values. Audit
similar values obtained from network data~>\Audii
TAMS and UATMP analyses are summarized in .'
form the basis for a selection of 30 percent as
criterion for audit accuracy.
pai/ticipating
e results used to
es will be compared to
accuracy results for
These values
perormance
1.6 OPTIONAL GC/FID SCREENING OF
1.6.1 Summary
CANISTERS
1.6.1.1 The air sample is screenedXby ~GC/fID to determine the
approximate range of concentrations oSf volatile organic compounds and
whether the sample shpaTcPBe\diluted priorvto GC/MS analysis.
1.6.1.2 Since FID/idantifibatipns_^are based <&n retention time alone, an
FID screening anaXysi/s is usdfulineTs^ablisxhing tentative
identifications ^nd/concentr&tiar»-vpf tnV-eomponents in a sample and in
determining whe/ihejc a dilution/of the^^ample will be required prior to
GC/MS analysis
1.6.2 Apparatus and
1.6.2.1 Gas-trhnjwa^ograpFfxAn "at^lytical system complete with gas
chromatoefaph suitabiexfor on^xolumh injection and all required
access or ies^lnclua^g analytic a l^Tsolumns , gases, flame ionization
detecDfer,/and integrator. \A data system is recommended for measuring
peak/areas. SubambientN^verv control and oven temperature programming
are/reouired.
1.6/2x2 Cft^Dmatographic /coLdmn: 30 m x 0.53 mm fused silica column
such as^fi^-1, i*§- 5 , or D»B-^24, or equivalent. The column temperature
should be tt^Jd atxx50°!6 for 2 min and then programmed from -50°C to
150°C at 8°C/ral^andsneld/at 150°C until all target compounds elute.
NOTE: The wider MegaWre® column (i.e., 0.53 mm I. D.) is less
July, 1991
Page
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
susceptible to plugging as a. result of trapped water,
the need for a Nafion® dryer in the analytical syst
retention time variability has been observed when
not used to remove water vapor from the sample st
therefore must be careful to consider any retenti
identifications are made. The Megabore® column
approaching that of a packed column, while ret,
resolution traits of narrower columns (i.e.,
operating parameters are to be optimized by
1.6.2.3 Six-port gas chromatographic valve.
1.6.2.4 Cryogenic trap with temperaturf! control as-s^mbly:
1.4.2.
^thus eliminating
?However, greater
Nafion® dryer is
and the analyst
shifts when
tie capacity
the peak
see section
1.6.2.5 Electronic mass flow controlleiump, "capable of
reducing the downstream press*ffe~~o£—thigflow controlled/to provide the
minimum pressure differentia^
rates
1.6.2.7 Chromatographic grade st
steel plumbing fittings.
1.6.2.8 Vacuum/pr
measuring vacuum and/pressur
1.6.2.9 Stainless' s
two-stage cylind*
nitrogen, and h
controlled flow
el tubing and stainless
steel gauges, capable of
gulators: Standard,
re "gauges for helium, air,
1.6.2.10 Gas
from gas streams^
1.6.2.11
1.6.3 Reagen
d to remove organic impurities and moisture
manifold described: see section 1.4.2
>
f helium, hydrogen, nitrogen and air,
r cooling GC oven and cryogenic trap.
HPLC grade, for humidifying gas streams.
July, 1991
Page D - 31/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
1.6.4 Procedure
1.6.4.1 Prepare working calibration standards as,
and calibrate the GC at three of the five (2, 5
concentrations to determine the instrument lirv
Once the FID linearity range has be; establi
calibrated using a single-point (5 ppov) cal
period.
1.6.4.2 Analyze the sample with the sam-
1.4.7.5 and 1.4.7.6. Use the retention
the calibration standard to tentativel
sample.
1.6.5 Analytical Decision Point
1.6.5.1 Based on the concentrations of
compounds in the sample, determine whether
whether the target compounds are within the rangl
calibration.
Zcribed in 1.4.4.3,
j>pbv)
sensitivity.
be
12-hour
npling described in sections
target compounds in
tt compounds in the
1.6.5.2 If target compounds
calibration, proceed to sectior
[ithin therST
identified target
must be diluted or
GC/MS
>f the GC/MS
1.6.5.3 If target compounds are presant? at/ concentrations higher than
the calibration range of the GC/MS \then tfne sample must be diluted as
described in section 1.4.9.4 prior to\GC/4lS analysis.
July, 1991
Page D - 32/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-1. TARGET COMPOUND LIST (TCL)
•CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTITATION LIMITS (CJ
FOR VOLATILES COLLECTED IN CANISTERS
Compound
Vinyl chloride
Trichloroethylene
Chloroform
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Acrylonitrile
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Styrene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes, m- and p-
Xylene, o-
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,3-Butadiene
Acetone
Chloroethane
2-Butanone
Acrolein
Benzyl chloride
4-Methyl-2-pen
cis-1.3-Dich
trans-1,2-D
1,4-Dichlo/ob
Hexachlorpbut&diene
75-01-4
79-01-6
67-66-3
71-43-2
56-23-5
127-18-4
75-35-4
107-13-1
107-06-2
108-90-7
71-55-6
79_-06-5
7/
r
120-
100-4
75-34-
108-88-3
30-20-7
5-00-3
78-93-3
-02-8
-7
10061-
156-60-5
06-46-7
87-68-3
July, 1991
Page D - 33/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-1. TARGET COMPOUND LIST (TCL)7
.CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTITATION LIMITS
FOR VOLATILES COLLECTED IN CANISTER
(continued)
CAS RN
75-6
142-82-
111-65-9
75-45-6
Compound
Broraomethane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methanol
Bromodichloromethane
Acetonitrile
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
3-Chloro-l-propene
Dibromochloromethane
Methyl methacrylate
Vinyl acetate
Propylene
l,l,2-Trichloro-1.2,2-
trifluoroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Heptane
Octane
Chlorodifluoromethane
alpha-Methyl styrene
n-Pentane
Hexane
1,2-Dichloro-l,1,2,2-
tetrafluoroethane
1,3,5-Trimethylbenz
1,2,4-Trimethvlbenze
July, 1991
Page D - 34/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-2. REQUIRED BFB KEY IONS AND ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
8.0
30.0
base
5.0
less
50.0
4.0
93.0
5.0
Ion Abundance Criteria
• 40.0 percent of mass 95
- 66.0 percent of mass
peak, 100 percent relaj
• 9.0 percent of mass
than 2.0 percent of
- 120.0 percent of
• 9.0 percent of me
- 101.0 percent
• 9.0 percent of
Note :
even though"
iundances must /be ^normalized to m/z 95, the nominal base peak,
je iottvabundance £f rji/z 174 may be up to 120 percent that of m/z 95.
July, 1991
Page D - 35/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-3. CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR TARGET /OM/OUNDS
Primary Ion*
Secondary
Parameter
lonfs")
Vinyl chloride*-0
Trichloroe thene*'0
Chloroform*-0
Benzene"1"-0
Carbon tetrachloride*'0
Te trachloroe thene* • °
1,l-dichloroethene*'°
Acrylonitrile*'0
1,2-dichloroethane*'0
Chlorobenzene*'0
1,1,1-trichloroethane*'0
1,1,2-trichloroethane0
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane°
Ethyl benzene*'0
Methylene chloride*'0
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene0
Styrene0
1,1-dichloroethane0
Toluene*'0
Xylenes, o-, m-, and p-°
1,2-dichloropropane*'°
1,2-dichlorobenzene0
1,2-dibromoethane*'°
1,3-butadiene*
Acetone*'0
Chloroethane0
2 -butanone*'0
Acrolein
Benzyl chloride0
4-methyl-2-pentanone
c is -1,3 -dichloropropene0
*The primary io/i should be u^ed cmless interferences are present, in which case
a secondar/ iott may be used.
*NIST certified gaseous standads Wre available for these compounds.
°Gaseous/staMards prepared grjiviijietrically using NIST traceable weights are
available^fpr tne^e compounds
Note: Standards^tpr
either static diluti
apparatus
compounds can be prepared from neat materials using
bottles /or by purging neat materials from purge and trap
into canisters-\(see/Section 6).
July, 1991
Page D - 36/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-3. CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR TARGET GROUNDS
• . (continued)
Parameter
lon(s)
trans -1,2-dichloroethene
1,4-dichlorobenzene°
Hexachlorobutadiene0
Bromomethane* • °
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
Dichlorodifluoromethane* •"
Chloromethane0
cis-1,2-dichloroethene0
Methanol0
Bromodichloromethane
Acetonitrile*'0
1,3-dichlorobenzene0
3-chloro-l-propene°
Dibromochloromethane
Methyl methacrylate0
Vinyl acetate
Propylene
l,l,2-trichloro-l,2,2-
tr if luoroe thane*'0
Trichlorofluoromethane*'0
Heptane
Octane
Chiorodifluoromethane
Alpha-Methyl styrene
n-pentane
Hexane
l,2-dichloro-l,l,2,2
tetraf luoroethan-
1,3, 5-trimethylbenz
1,2 ,4-trimethylbenzene
Primary Ion**
Secondary
July,1991
. 3
29
41, 29, 57,-85
31
117, 103, 78, 115
42, 41, 27, 29
43, 41, 29, 27
135, 87
120
120
Page D - 3
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-4. METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (MDL), PPB FOR
TO-14 List
Lab.//l
Lab.#2
COMPOUNDS *
MDL, ppbv
Freon 12
Methyl Chloride
Freon 114
Vinyl Chloride
Methyl Bromide
Ethyl Chloride
Freon 11
1,1-Dichloroethene
Dichloromethane
Freon 113
1,1-Dichloroethane
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Toluene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p-Xylene
0.40
July, 1991
Page D - 38/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
T.--LE D/VC-4. METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (MDL) , PPB FOR 1,0-14 COMPOUNDS *
(continued)
TO-14 List
Lab.tfl
Lab.#2
MDL, ppbv
Styrene 1.64
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane 0.28
o-Xylene 0.57
4-Ethyltoluene
1,3,5-TrimethyIbenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
m-Dichlorobenzene 0.36
Benzyl Chloride
p-Dichlorobenzene 0.70
o-Dichlorobenzene 0.44
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
*Method Detection Limits (MDLs)
deviation of seven replicate analy
confidence. For Lab #2 the MDLs repr
for MS/SCAN for Lab #1 and for MS/SIM
by SIM but not by SCAN, the SIM MDL has
value has been used as a substitute SC.
given in the last column. Tep_of^ the compo
roduct of the standard
test value for 99%
ur studies. MDLs are
For those compounds measured
It/plied by a factor of 5 and this
The resultant list of MDLs are
ave no listed MDLs.
July, 1991
Page D - 39/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-5.
Monitoring
Compound
Identification
SUMMARY OF EPA DATA ON REPLICATE
FROM EPA NETWORK OPERATIONS*
Urban Air Toxics
Monitoring Program
%RP , # ppbv
ION (RP)
Dichloromethane 16.3
1,2 Dichloroethane 36.2
1,1,1 Trichloroethanel4.1
Benzene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
m-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
"' ?/ denotes n
statistic.
difference
* Styrene
entries.
not inclu<
~ZT7"
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
0.6
2.0
1.5
3.1
0.5
1.5
0.2*
0.5
ate orMuplicate analysis used to generate the
von is defined as the mean ratio of absolute
: the GC column used in UATMP. For the TAMS
ction limits for 18 of 47 replicates and were
JuLv
Page D - 40/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/VC-6. AUDIT ACCURACY (AA) VALUES* FOR TO-L4 COMPOUNDS
Selected Compounds
From TO-14 List
FY-88
TAMS
AA(%), N-30
Vinyl chloride
Methyl bromide
Freon 11
Dichloromethane
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
I,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
o-Xylene
4.6
*A.udit accuracy is
lute differenc,
divided by t
the audic ac
because chsrv
denot
July, i<5<51
of multiple determinations of the abso-
.rement result and its nominal value
ie number of audits averaged to obtain
lation is not available for other TO-14 compounds
in\the audit materials.
Page D - 41/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Pressure
Regulator
if
vacuum
.. Pump
Vacuum shutoff
Pump Valve
Cryogenic
Trap Cooler
(Liquid Argon)
V
Shuto
Valve
Cryogenic
Trap Cooler
(Liquid Arg
Vacuum
Shutoff
Valve
Vacuum
uge
Zero
Shutoff
Valve
Flow
Control
Valve
Vacuu
Gauge
Shutoff
Valve
SampleYv/Simple
Canister! \( Canister
Sample
Canister
Optional
Isothermal
Oven
Canister Cleaning System
July,1991
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Thermocouple
Vacuum Gauge
Vent 4
ernate Canister Cleaning System
July, 1991
Page D - 43/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Sample
Conditioner
ssure Adjus
rrna^Pore-Oryer
Intern
rds
Mass
Spectroscopy
Chromatography
Ion Trap MS
Quadrupole WIS
Other MS Types
• /Two-D Chromatography
^ ^S
Preconcentrator
" ';£: '
?
• Auto Cryogen Trap
• LAr in Flask
• Solid Sorbent Tube
Sample
Conditioner
Cryo focusing
- Separate Assembly
- Head of Column
He Purge of Solid
Sorbent
Analysis Description For
Samples From Canisters
July, 1991
Page D - 44/VC
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
LEGEND
F = Zero dead volume fitting
T = Thermocouple
FC = Flow controller
IN = Liquid nitrogen
V = Valve
Calibration Gas
Cylinder
Zero-Air
Cylinder
Calibration Manifold
=3 Septum
Dry Purge
• Gas
Perma-
Pure
Dryer
Heated Enclosure
To
Auto. Temp.
Control
Froph LN Tank
GeneratfiC a
Analysis SchematicOven
id Canister
—From
He Tank
July,
Page D - 45/VC
-------
ANALYTICAL METHOD
VOLATILE ORGANIC CO
COLLECTED ON TENAX®"
GAS CHROMATQfiRAPHY/MASS
INATION OF
Cs) IN AIR
.YZED BY
IMETRY (GC/MS)
-------
SECTION 2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN
COLLECTED ON TENAX® AND ANALYZED
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY (0C/MS)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SAMPLE STORAGE AND HOLDING TIMES .... ^ 6
CARTRIDGE PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION . / ./ 6
GC/MS ANALYSIS OF VOLATILES FfcQM TENAX®yCAR^RIDGES 15
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMEMTS FOR DEMONSTBATINGSMETHOD ACCEPTABILITY
FOR THE ANALYSIS OF AMBIENT AIR . . . >\ . /N^ 53
-------
SECTION 2
IN
ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION,
•VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs)
COLLECTED ON TENAX® AND ANALYZED
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.1.1 Scope and Application
2.1.1.1 This document describes a methou for determining the presence
and concentration of specific volatile/organic compounds (VOCs) in
ambient air. VOCs for which this metbiod/is appropriate are identified
in the Target Compound List (Exhibit/C) /and in T4bL6 D/VOAT- 1 of this
Part. The method is based on the c/lla^tion of'vO/Cs on Tenax® solid
adsorbent [poly (2,6-diphenyl phenylene oxi.de/]./The collected VOCs are
thermally desorbed and analyzed by gas^-vQhromatography (GC)/mass
spectrometry (MS).
2.1.1.2 While this method outlines the use of Tfe«4x® a"5k the adsorbent,
alternative adsorbents (e. g./~~rrraitib_ed) will be allcJwed/ The Laboratory
must demonstrate audit accuracy and rep!i^ar6«-4irec:Lsion limits of the
alternative adsorbent as well aSTa^Sw^hent: characteristic data for
selected analytes in order for\it\to be e^}uiVa4e*!£_j;4ee part 2.5). In
addition, the analysis of Performance Evaluation (PE) samples must meet
required audit accuracy and replr^ate\precision limits as outlined in
part 2.5. They are:
Audit
30 perceVt;
within SL 30
ercent.
2.1.1.3 These acui
acquired over
System (TAMS) . Tjrfe TAMs
distributive /air Volume
proximity,
help address breakthrough,
methodology.
Volume meth
were based upon data
USEPA's Toxic Air Monitoring
,dsorbent tubes as part of the
'dology. Tslir tubes are arranged in close
fferent air volume through the resin bed to
artifact formation and biases in the sampling
(GC/MS) i
rs as the coecno
r which precision ani
on 2) method
knowin
2.1.1.5
r to? Exhibit D, Section 1
>n of Vcfiatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in
s Steel Canisters" in that the same analytical
Exhibit D, Section 1 uses-Summa® polished
mechanism and has been validated for forty
accuracy have been fully defined. While
been validated for a larger number of VOCs,
understanding its many limitations.
is/designed to allow some flexibility in order to
July, 1991
Page D - 1/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
accommodate procedures currently in use. However,/sucft flexibility also
places considerable responsibility with the user to document that such
procedures give acceptable results (i.e., documentation of method
performance within each laboratory situation is/requiriad) . Each
contractor must generate standard operating pr/ce^ses (^©•£s) describing
specific stepwise instructions for the Tenax^pr/para^tl^m amKhandling
as well as the analytical procedures. SOPs ^sho/uld be reaclily available
to and understood by all involved personnel
procei
2.1.1.6 This method is based upon
Environmental Protection Agency, Atmosp,
Assessment Laboratory, Research Trian
"Standard Operating Procedure for the/GC>
Organic Compounds Collected on Tena:
determined by this method are nonpotur^ org
the range of approximately 80 - 200°C.
developed by the U.S.
and Exposure
outlined in
fation of Volatile
Compounds/which can be
.ving boiling points in
not all compounds
falling into this category can be determine"^. Exhibit C and Table
D/VOAT- 1 of this Part list the target compourftisto^B^analyzed by this
method. Other compounds (e.g., semi-polar) may ytedd satisfactory
results but validation by the/~lnthtvidiial user is requited.
2.1.2 Summary of Method
2.1.2.1 Ambient air is drawn thXpugk
approximately 1-2 grams of Tenax®\
compounds and most inorganic atmospheric
cartridge, certain organic, compounds
2.1.2.2 After the
cartridge is tagg
2.1.2.3 Upon
the lab book
are stored un
are\trat
ack
orbent cartridge containing
ighly volatile organic
onstituents pass through the
rapped on the resin bed.
3ed on the resin bed, the
lab for analysis.
,e cartridge is logged into
completed. The cartridges
'n until analysis.
2.1.2.4 Prior to analysis^fey GC/MS, an internal standard is added to
permit quantitative analysis/"XThe organics trapped on the Tenax® are
thermally/
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.1.2.6 The scan of the mass spectrometer is initi^tecj and the
analytical procedure, is begun. Under a flow of heiiup, the GC column is
programmed to a temperature to allow the elution yof /ll of the organic
compounds while the mass spectrometer is scanning. A)ata are recorded by
the computer for subsequent processing. Quant^tation^is performed by
the method of relative response factors, where; th^proporSs^onate system
responses for analyte and standard are deterniinsti prioXto tha analysis
of the sample and this relative system response/ is used tbxdetertiwjie the
quantity of compound present on the sample
2.1.2.7 Components are identified in a /computerized library search
routine, on the basis of the GC retention /time and/mass spectral
characteristics .
2.1.2.8 The quantitative analysis £s performed' by/ a combination of
manual and computerized procedures: \the ctMjjpj/ter/ is instructed to seek
characteristic ions in a previously deb&rmined retention window. At
this point the operator intervenes to determine rf\the compound of
interest has been located correctly. If the campounoVxidentif ication is
correct, the computer then performs the quantitative calculation using
the method of relative resporise~~f3e-fcor_s_.^ Data are re"pyartifacts can arise from
dants in the sample, degradation of the
rations of certain volatile organic compounds.
solve< by running blank and control samples prior
ampling volumes.
2.1.3.2/ Ex£»»&iJieconbentratibus/of water vapor on high humidity days
may cause/some changes in\ retention properties of Tenax®. In general,
this/can/be minimized >V multiple sampling volumes, smaller sampling
volumes/ and the use ofYes\ccants in the culture tubes used for
st0raj
x.
2.1.
interest
be extreme!
Cof
a c
ination c/f the Tenax® adsorbent with the corapound(s) of
ionly/eno6untered problem in the method. The user must
.n tme preparation, storage, and handling of the
:are
July, 1991
Page D - 3/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
/""'N
cartridges throughout the entire sampling and anaLysig process to
minimize this problem. Otherwise, false positive/detection of
chloroform, toluene, benzene, and other common Volatile organics may
occur. Precautions should be taken for sampling caus^c atmospheres
which contain levels of NOX and molecular halc/gen^greate^than 2-5 ppm
and 25 ppb, respectively.
jown
2.1.3.4 Breakthrough volumes of the compoCMa^s' of interest
or determined prior to use. Breakthrough: vo/lumes for some c
(i.e., vinyl chloride, chloroform etc. )/mav/be so small that
quantitative collection is impractical/ Other characteristics of Tenax®
which may adversely affect its preparation and usfe in this method are:
Poor desorption of highly p^olar compounds;
• Possible retention of oxygfe*u leading to sample oxidation;
and
High benzene background due to manufate^urin|
2.1.3.5 Tenax breakthrough/volume also Tnrvba»ocesthe linear range of
the method, detection limits\ an^"~repre
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
eratures
2.1.4 Definitions.
NOTE: Definitions used in this test method and any usat-prepared SOPs should
be consistent with ASTM Test Methods D1356, B260, and/E35lC All abbreviations
and symbols are defined within this document at the point
2.1.4.1 Cryogen: A liquified gas used to
(-150°C) in the cryogenic trap of the analy
cryogen is liquid nitrogen.
2.1.4.2 Dynamic calibration: Calibration j6f an analytical system with
calibration gas concentrations that are; generated/£tw a dynamic, flowing
system, by metering known volumetric flow/rates of concentrated gas
standards and zero gas into a common/in]/et line/to ,che system.
2.1.4.3 MS-SCAN: The gas chromatog^saDh
selective detector where the instrument"
mass data for the target compounds and to
'is/coupled to a mass
progi^ammed to acquire all
;regar<.all others.
2.1.4.4 Deuterated compounds:
(hydrogen isotope that is
for system quality assuranc
Those chemicals wn~ich contain deuterium
hydrogenjNised as tracers
of
2.1.4.7 Relat
chemicals for/th
where the den
chemical.
2.1.4.8 Bre_ak£hrough vi
particul^Tcomponen~6\will
Tenax®
2.1.4.5 Static calibration: &alf
known concentrations of calibrate
gas cylinders or prepared from
2.1.4.6 Retention ti
from a chromatograp^c colunf
measured from the
until its maxim-
tical system with
tained from a source such as
'ock solutions.
elute a specific chemical
carrier gas flow rate,
ed into the gas stream
e detector.
itio of RTs of two different
4lumn and carrier gas flow rate;
?4nts the retention time for a reference
Sample volume at which point a
.initially detected in the eluate from the
(SR): The quantity of a component measured
. known quantity of an isotopically labeled
into the same Tenax® cartridge.
July, 1991
Page D - 5/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.2, SAMPLE STORAGE AND HOLDING TIMES
2.2.1 Receipt of Exposed Cartridges
2.2.1.1 Receive all exposed Tenax® cartridge
the appropriate Chain-of-Custody sheet. Mat
Sheet with the corresponding sample to ensure
2.2.1.2 Check each Chain-of-Custody Sheet carefully for the
items: 1) a signature of a person relinquishing custody, 2) the
amounts of surrogate loaded on the cartridge, 3) the sampling
temperature and volume collected, and/U) /the Tenax® $atch number. Do
not analyze any sample for which Cha/n-or-Custody s^eet or any of the
above information is missing.
2.2.2 Procedures for Sample Storage
Put all cans of samples in the cartridgexfreeze-rwhen received,
and log each sample in the appropriate notebook as^recelved. Place each
Chain-of-Custody sheet in th^~prt>j-ac£^notebook (witn^a^Z other
information regarding that /articular samp±e-)-^af_tersigning and dating
it, and store any used cartridge^iir~s«Aied cans so~^hey can be
recycled, cleaned, and used againN
2.2.3 Contract Required Holding Times
Analysis of airsamples must be\completed within 14 days of the
validated time of sample receipt (VTSR\.
2.3
CARTRIDGE PREP/
AND CERTQ
[ION
2.3.1 Apparatus and/Materials
2.3.1.1 Tena4® Cleaning/
2.3.1.1.1 Exbractiok^thimbles: Cellulose (60 mm x 180 mm).
2. 3^71.2 """Stschlet e^cractlen apparatus: Extraction flask and
V18£L-ffiauextraction thrrabl^s, Fisher Scientific, 711 Forbes
/Ave/fue, Pitts%urgh\ PA, 15Z19, or equivlaent.
/3.1.1.3 CondenkerA
Tweezeri.
. l^Reake/ -A 00 mL.
2. 3 .1.1-V-x.Variab/e transformer.
July, 1991
Page D - 6/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.3.-1..1.7 Heating mantle for 1000 mL flask.
2.3.1.1.8 Mettler balance: Type H15 for
Scientific, 711 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh,
equivalent.
NOTE: All glassware must be cleaned
hour in Amway SA-8 laundry compound,
several rinses with deionized water
four hours at 500-550°C.
2.3.1.2 Tenax® Drying
2. 3'. 1.2.1 Desiccator with gas,
(Drierite).
2.3.1.2.2 Jar, wide mouth amber.
2.3.1.2.3 Crystallizing dish, Kimax®.
ing Tenax®, Fisher
15219, or
2.3.1.2.4 Vacuum oven/equipp
to water apparatus va
Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA,
dry ice ^s^p and connected
Lentific, 711 Forbes
2.3.1.2.5 Aluminum foil.
2.3.1.2.6 Funnel.
2.3.1.2.7 Py/ex disks^N
2.3.1.3 Tenax® Sieving (OpQio*
/ / ;
2.3.1.3.:
2.3.1.3>2^ Sieves:/ 40'and 60 mesh.
2.3.1.3.3 Gla>s^funn>
^- --^
2.3.1.4
' ^——— "\
g\oves.
iglass wool: Unsilanized.
dipping cylinder: 17.8 cm x 1.6 cm O.D.,
/371856, Cincinnati, OH 45222.
liners: 24 mm.
July, 1991
Page D - 7/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.3.'l.-4.5 Stainless steel tweezers.
2.3.1.4.6 Screw caps: 24 mm.
2.3.1.4.7 Silicone septa: Teflon®-ba9
2.3.1.4.8 One gallon clean metal pa^bi
Tenax® cartridges.
2.3.1.4.9 Stainless steel tubes
Co., P.O. Box 371856, Cincinnati
2.3.1.4.10 Glass jar: Cappe
storage of purified Tenax®.
2.3.1.4.11 Glass wool, silanized.
2.3.2 Reagents
cm 0.D., TEKMAR
-/fined screw cap. For
2.3.2.1 Tenax®, 60/80 mesh/(2 , 6_-dipheny
TA - Alltech Associates, Inc
oxide polymer), GC or
rfield, IL 60015.
2.3.2.2 Granular activated charcoa\: For/preventing contamination of
Tenax® cartridges during storage .\ \/ /
2.3.2.3 Acetone:
2.3.2.4 Methanol:
2.3.2.5 n-Pent
2.3.3 Procedures f>
{
2.3.3.1 Cartr£
tion and Preparation
2 . 3 . 3.. 1.1 Several car^s^dge designs have been reported in the
1 i tjeiTaturTXThe mo^^commbn is shown in Figure D/VOAT- l(a) .
minimizes cb^aat of the sample with metal surfaces,
Decomposition in certain cases. However, a
design is the need to rigorously avoid
jutside portion of the cartridge since the
iected to the purge gas stream during the
Clean cotton gloves must be worn at all times
rtridges and exposure of the open cartridge
air mnstyoe minimized.
2.3.3.1.
nd common type of design is shown in Figure
July, 1991
Page D - 8/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
D/VQAT- l(b). This design eliminates the ne
contact with the exterior surface, since on^Jy
cartridge is purged.
2.3.3.1.3 Finally, a third design has
as illustrated in Figure D/VOAT- l(c)
adsorbent beds to capture the more vo
cannot retain.
2.3.3.1.4 Regardless of the cart/id
desorption module and sampling sy/te/ must be selected to be
compatible with that particular
avoid direct
ie interior of the
oped by Supelco,
ains three
Tenax®
rmal
-abridge
2.3.3.2 Tenax® Purification
.before/
ting rt
All Tenax®, whether new or re
solvent extraction and thermal treatmert
collection of organic compounds. The f., _
followed (as illustrated in Figure D/VOAT- 5)
packed into cartridges: 1) selection of the Tena
solvent extraction using a ^
sieving the Tenax®, 5) pac
thermally desorbing the Tena
the cleaning and desorbing procedure by &C
and storing the cartridges. Al
as well as cartridge materials sh~
rinsing followed by an acetone rins
(.ng
irtric
an<
>e purified through
it is used for sample
tine shall be
.x® is cleaned and
used, 2)
.action, 3) dryWg the Tenax®, 4)
cartridges, 6)
ig the integrity of
is, and 8) packing
used in Tenax® purification
>e /thoroughly cleaned by water
dried in an oven at 250°C.
en
ensurij
2.3.3.3 Tenax® Selection
2.3.3.3.1 / T.
record on/th
D/VOAT-
batch that
the
iax®,
Tenax®
sign a unique number and
Wo^sljsheet, as illustrated in Figure
f possi^le/new^enax®7should be taken from a single
ce/tified cT&an by the manufacturer.
.as beer
2.3.3.3.2
Worksheet.
If tM T^nax® is new, also record batch number on the
Ifhe Te^ax® is used, record previous Tenax® blank
ax® was used (i.e., fixed-site
orxersotvil air) .
2.3.:
Cenax® Cl«
Procedure
The following adWAent purification procedure is based on U S
Environmental Protections Agfency, Atmospheric Research and Exposure
As^essmint Laboratory (AREAL), Research Triangle Park, NC Standard
Opera^mg Procedure (SOP) .manual entitled "SOP for Preparation of Clean
Tenax® Ca^trid|B«". I/eviAtions from this procedure should be carefully
evaluated b>€p.re ihtp/em^ntation into the user prepared SOP. Shorter
1991
Page D - 9/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
cleaning procedures of the Tenax® have been docume/ted'. It is the
laboratory responsibility to provide documentation tc/the variation from
this cleaning procedure to the Agency prior to implementation into the
laboratory SOP.
2.3.3.4.1 In a hood, set up a sufficient /numberxof
extraction units, each with a 1000 mL/rouhd flask atxi a
cooled condenser. Load approximatelyx^Ty g of Tenax® i
thimble and cover the Tenax® with approximately two centinffe4;ep£ of
unsilanized glass wool.
2.3.3.4.2 Place the thimble in/the/Soxhlet< aid 600 mL of
methanol to the 1000 mL flask ^nd/carefully pur an additional 300
mL of methanol onto the Tena*
NOTE: The 300 mL of extra methahol are added directly onto the
Tenax® to ensure sufficient solvent^Eqr tnex^xtraction process
after the initial adsorption of solvent>
jr water and
irted
2.3.3.4.3 Turn on the
controlled heating ma^tle_and recor
date and time the extr
extraction cycle, adjustvthex tempeyatyfe'
transformer to obtain five, cyixles
extraction for 16-24 hours ,\che
daily and entering the info
iperature
Tenax® Worksheet the
the first
he variable
hour. Continue the
the extraction units twice
the Worksheet.
NOTE: To avojt
flowing to
2.3.3.4.4
methanol
and let/it
th imb 1 eC^w i th
then retu:
ition/on
losses, Vnsuke that sufficient water is
the system and discard the
arefully pull out the thimble
for 10 minutes. Rinse the
lean n-pentane. Repeat the rinse twice and
e to the Soxhlet. Discard the n-pentane.
tion do not handle the thimble with your
July, 1991
^/*
700 mL of clean pentane to the flask.
t and heat to reflux. Record in the
id time that the pentane extraction began.
adjust the temperature to obtain five
Complete/the information on the Worksheet for this
Tenax^xpatcnV^aTid idontinue the extraction for 16-24 hours. After
extraction^ cool /che system to room temperature, remove the
Page D - 10/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
thimble from the Soxhlet with a pair of twee
pentane.
2.3.3.5 Tenax® Drying
NOTE: Obtain and fill out a Tenax® cleanup wjzfrk
and time of each operation.
rs/and discard the
2.3.3.5.1 Place the beak'ers contain
desiccator at room temperature unde
25 mL/min) through a cryogenic
After at least 24 hours, transfe tl
the thimbles
slow nitrogen flow
remove residual organics.
conten'Ssx.of the two thimbles
to a large crystallizing dish. /Coyer the dish/loosely with
aluminum foil, set the dish in/the vacuum/oven and recharge the
cryogenic trap with dry ice/^sopropanol And/dry the Tenax®
overnight at 100°C and slightVa^uum%e_/g./ -15 inches of water) .
2.3.3.5.2 The following day turn off^^he he^er and allow the
oven to reach room temperature (about 3 rtaurs) r>evfore opening the
oven. To open the vacuum oven, first close z>-ff the valve leading
to the pump. Connect /ChervTCrogen^line to the o-fcner valve
connector on the vacuum o-wau^and slowIy~~tTHftB^j2£, the nitrogen flow
with one hand while opening. tneva~bve with the/other hand. Ensure
that the nitrogen is venbe^d
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.3.3.7 Cartridge Preparation
2.3,3.7.1 Place the Teflon® liners in a
in methanol for 10 minutes, and rinse th
methanol.
2.3.3.7.2 Repeat the above with n-pe
2.3.3.7.3 Dry the Teflon® liners i,
hours at 100°C and slight vacuum.
mouth jar, protected from light.
NOTE: To avoid contamination
tweezers to handle the liners
2.3.3.7.4 Clean the silicone sept
and sonicate them
sith fresh
le vacuum oven
the liners in a wide
lways use a pair of
ibove procedures.
2.3.3.7.5 Soak the 24-mm screw caps in m&thanolNfor 30 minutes,
then remove the paper -linedfoil from the capTs^witj^ a spatula.
Rinse the caps in cleaja methan»±--an4_dry them inN:he vacuum oven
overnight at 100°C.
2.3.3.7.6 Wrap the KimaxS
secure it with clear tape
bottom of the culture tube.
2.3.3.7.7 Plac#--a~silicone sept
septum with a/cleaned TXfIon-
tube with t
uminum foil and
e a' 4-cm glass wool plug at the
the screw cap. Cover the
loosely close the culture
2.3.3.8 Cartri
2.3.3.8
glass tul
bes before packing. Discard
ends or cracks.
NOTE:
is referre
in a rack and insert a 4-cm glass wool
and press the glass wool plug
•el.
^lass funnel, transfer a known amount (-2
le tube, using a glass funnel.
tjher 4-cm glass wool plug into the other end
Lguife D/VOAT- 1) and lightly compress it with a
(stainless steel or glass) packed with Tenax®
'a Tenax® cartridge.
July, 1991
Page D - 12/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.3.-3..8.S Store the Tenax® cartridges in th
tubes until desorption.
2.3.3.9 Tenax® Cartridge Pretreatment
2.3.3.9.1 Place the Tenax® cartridge
turn on the helium tank. This allows
cartridge before heating.
ipared culture
2.3.3.9.2 Turn on the desorption
nitrogen in the cryogenic trap ar
desorption chambers.
unit and
from the
open
liqui
the helium line to the
place
NOTE: Insure that a cryogeni
line to remove residual orga^ics>
trap has been/placed in the helium
ander
2.3.3.9.3 Adjust the helium flo
approximately 15 mL/min., then desor
five hours at 250°C. Make sure that he
each cartridge throughout desorption.
chamber, to
:he T>nax® cartridges for
^is maintained to
2.3.3.9.4 Refill the^ryagenictrap wTch—liquid nitrogen every
hour, or when the leve\or\liqul
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
choose to use GC/FID due to logistical and
Analysis by GC/FID is accomplished as desci
for the detector.
jst/considerations.
Lbe4 for GC/MS except
2.3.3.9.9 While acceptance criteria car( vary^depen4jng on the
components of interest and anticipated/coircentra^ionrevel, at a
minimum, the clean cartridge should b£ demonstrate&xto contain
less than one fourth of the minimum ytajjel of interestror eac
component. For most compounds, the/blank level should be^iess
than 10 nanograms per cartridge irr omer to be acceptable. More
rigid criteria may be adopted, if necessary/^within a specific
laboratory. If a cartridge doe/ nor meet pnes/e acceptance
criteria, the entire lot shoul/1 be/ rejected.
2.3.3.10 Cartridge Internal Markei
ind
2.3.3.10.1 Each sample cartridge mu"s£ be
with 300 ng of perfluorotoluene (PFT).and
prepared from a static dilution bottle tea
3.6.3). PFT serves as
1,2-dichlorobenzene-d
MS.
2.3.3.10.2 As a quality
cartridges must also be spiked"
standards (-300 ng) as indie.
and analysis. TJie-^deuterated
markers can bemadded
vaporization/^ sae—Sectifc
or by the perme'ation
chlorob5mzefie-d5, a
Standards Spiking
Antitatively spiked
obenzene
Section
for the MS and
internal marker for the
dicator, all Tenax®
th/three deuterated surrogate
£ performance during sampling
ate standards and internal
ben cartridge by either flash
dilution (see part 2.4.2)
part 2.4.3). They are:
2.3.3.11 Supplying^vQartribes for Collection of Samples
l^epare "fet^e CHMji-of-Custody and Field Data Sheet for
collected/ Remove and label the requested
irtridges from the Tenax® storage area. Store
id Xanax® cartridges in the Tenax® storage area
one Tenax® batch number has been assigned per
from same batch for all the field and duplicate
July, 1991
Page D - 14/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4* GC/MS ANALYSES OF VOLATILES FROM TENAX® CARTRIDGES
2.4.1 Summary of Method
2.4.1.1 This section includes a description o
associated procedures for GC/MS tuning, chara
of the GC/MS calibration procedures, and an
cartridges.
2.4.1.2 The analytical system is compris4d
spectrometer set in the full scan mode
automatic, repetitive analysis. The s
data for the target compounds. The Cpnt
Limits (CRQL) range from 1 ng to 50 iig
analytical precision of about 5 percent
Concentration of compounds based upo1
table is reported by an.automated data
quantitation is provided by this analysis.
system and
erformance
d Tenax®
equipped
mass
GC/MS is set up for
is prog^uammed to acquire
: Required Quantitation
. the fjill/scan mode with an
elatii/e standard deviation.
xisly installed calibration
^iuctioQ program. Primary
NOTE: Considerable variation from one laboratory^fco another is expected
in terms of instrument config^u7a^ToTh~~-_Xherefore, each^laboratory must
be responsible for verifying' thit__their partltttiar__svstern yields
satisfactory results. Part 2\5 o^scusSfe^specific performance
requirements which must be met\
2.4.1.3 GC/MS analysis is based
relative abundances of target ions.
Jination of retention times and
Se qualifiers are stored on the
scan m
hard disk of the GC/MJ
each chromatographi,
searching any GC/
such ion abundani
defined as an S
be available t
specified tim<
compounds, so
sample spectra
recent) release of tf
(NIST) MassSnectral
The data/system mus
been e
quali
rete
ab
ai
wf
dete
reported
analysis,
an experienced
and are applied for identification of
peak. The computer must have software that allows
for ions o!£ a ^pecified mass and plotting
tersus fiimfe^or>sund. The acceptance level for relative
to be within ± 20 percent of the expected
ils any of the qualifying tests is flagged
ta are manually examined by the analyst to
flag and whether the compound should be
this adds some subjective judgment to the
ed identification problems can be clarified by
Manual inspection of the quantitative results
July, 1991
Page D - 15/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
is also performed to verify concentrations outside/the'expected range.
2.4.1.4 A block diagram of the typical GC/MS sy^tenCrequired for
analysis of Tenax® cartridges is depicted in Figure IvVQAT- 2. The
thermal desorption module must be designed to/acc/imJttQdate^ehe specific
cartridge configuration used in the samplingyprotocol/X^teelNoj: nickel
metal surfaces should be employed. The voli^e/of tubing
leading from the cartridge to the GC coli
areas must be well-swept by helium carrie/: gis.
2.4.1.5 The GC column inlet should beycapble of Ke-«ig cooled to 10°C
and subsequently increased rapidly to/appytoximately /0°C. This can be
most readily accomplished using a GC/equ/ipped wyth -/n automated
subambient cooling capability (liquid ni-trogenVs aithough other
approaches such as manually cooling che
cotton swab containing liquid nitrogen ma be a
the column with a
:eptable.
2.4.1.6 The specific GC column and temperaturexgrogr^m employed will be
dependent on the specific compounds of interest. jfeppropMate conditions
are described in Table D/VOA7^27~Tn-~geaeral a nonpola^/stationary phase
(e.g., SE-30, OV-1) tempera t^re ^a^^ammed~T?oTn--3X^tp_ 245° C at 4°/min
will be suitable.
2.4.1.7 The relative response factol
calibration standard analysis is used
the sample. Secondary ion quantitatxion
sample interferences uith~<^ie primary^
quantitation is performed, document
The area of a secondaryTbTi cannot be su
primary ion unles/s a/relative respo~T^e facN
secondary ion.
from the daily continuous
'alculate the concentration in
s allowed ONLY when there are
ion\ If secondary ion
ons in the SDG Narrative.
tibuted for the area of a
is calculated using the
2.4.1.8 The riroc&dure attfemp/fcs to quartt^fy peaks which have been
qualitatively^identrf^ed/ Quantitation is based on integration of the
SICP of a quantiTfea4y.on massr or primary ion for the compound. This mass
has been previously fralectedsfor each compound based on its spectral
uniqueness/Jjitejasity, and lacks^pf potential interferences from known
coeluting^compounds^^Currehtly u^wd masses are listed in Table D/VOAT-
5 for /Dotb-TJrlmaEy and\secondaTSY/ions .
2.4.2
'cartridge: Sampling cartridges consist of 13.5
x rtJU mm Oorosil/acaife glass with polished-flat end surfaces. One
end is^&tchea^Vith/an I (inlet) and the other with an E (exit).
Stainlesss^eel cartridges (12.7 mm OD x 100 mm long) may also be
used. (see Ftgu^e D/VOAT- 1). Cartridges must fit into the
July, 1991
Page D - 16/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
thermal desorption unit.
2.4,2.1.2 Glass fiber filters, 25 nun (opti,
Sciences, 600 S. Wagner Rd, Ann Arbor, MI
2.4.2.1.3 Forceps.
2.4.2.1.4 Lint-free tissues: (e.g.,
Gelman
2.4.2.1.5 Filter holder: Stainles/
accommodate 1 inch diameter filtei
2.4.2.1.6 Cotton gloves: For h4nc
2.4.2.2 Sample Analysis
eel or aluminum (to
.ing Tenax®/cartridges.
2.4.2.2.1 Sample Desorption/Inje^&on Un
thermally heating a Tenax® sample
steel) for sample transfer into a suitaot&iGC/
analysis. The configuration of the thermal
permit the enclosure ai?ara^l?cl-4^a_ting of the
from room temperature <£o approximately
inert gas (helium) into\a
trap. The cryogenically
to a preselected temperature (
allowed to sweep the sample
chromatographic column. A sc
desorption/GC/MS^ee«£iguration
Designed for
lass or stainless
system for
sorp^ion unit should
x® cartridge
ijhile purging with an
2.4.2.2.2 G
capable of
resolutio
region e
control
spectra
and storage^
silica, 0.30
ly cooled /liquid nitrogen)
d sarople/must~~th4n be rapidly heated
C) and a helium gas supply
trap onto the gas
mat^c diagram of a typical thermal
wn in Figure D/VOAT- 2.
£og\aph/Mass Specrometer (GC/MS) should be
ming, exhibit unit mass
able of scanning a 35-300 amu
,v?ith/tiata system for instrument
data processing using
gorithms, and historical library screening
olumn required for this method is fused
m, SE-30 or OV-1 coating.
2.4.2.3
:n chambers: TEKMAR Co., P.O. Box 371856,
r NuTech Co., 2806 Cheek Rd., Durham, NC
July, 1991
Page D - 17/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
25, 50, 100, 500,
x> contain at least two
maintaining 60 ± 5°C;
connected to a
2.4.2.4 Standards Preparation
2.4.2.4.1 Static Dilution Bottle
• Two-liter round-bottom flas)
diameter glass beads and
magnetic stirring bar -
accept a screw-on Mining
P.O. Box 371856, Cincij
• Gas-tight glass micr/
1000, and 2500
• Laboratory oven -
dilution bottles a
Drying oven capable of 3
• Helium cy
length of
• Vacuum syrin
Magnetic stirre
2.4.2.4.2
saptum cap.
(see Figure D/VOAT- 3);
^crosyringes - 5 , 10 , 50 , and 100 /iL for
liquid standards into flash
s - 25, 50, 100, 250 mL;
Helitun cylinder and pressure regulator and needle
valves for controlling flow rate;
Flow meter (i.e., soap bubble, rotameter) ;
Thermal/conductivity detector; and
^Vacuum syringe cleaner.
July, 1991
Page D - 18/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4..2.4.3 Permeation Tube System
Permeation system (see Figure ^/V^AT- 4);
Nylon gloves;
Long glass hook (for retrj/evi^g permition^ubes);
• Permeation tubes;
Lint-free tissues (e
Stopwatch.
2.4.3 Reagents
2.4.3.1 Nitrogen gas: 99.995 percent
2.4.3.2 Helium: Certified 99.995 percent, ^w
2.4.3.3 Neat standards: C
2.4.3.4 Spectrograde methan
2.4.3.5 Spectrograde acetone:
NOTE: Individual
manufacturer's deter
standards should h
NMR or direct prol^e
checked by injec£io
glass capillary
chromatogram
observed and
standard is
GC/MS to confirm"
mass spectra.
2.4.4 Standard
(or standards must have a
percent or better, and isotopic
^Purity should be checked by
fed by the laboratory is
using a 50-m SE-30 WCOT
ilumn and FID. The resulting
Teaks. If such peaks are
of the standard peak, the
le following chemicals are also screened by
Lty of the compound by the examination of the
resents three procedures for generating known
VOCs for direct injection into the GC/MS for
ion on Tenax® for calibration of the entire
icy are: 1) use of flash vaporization
fted VOC standards upon Tenax® tubes, 2)
trations utilizing static dilution bottles,
ube system for generating known concentrations
July, 1991
Page D - 19/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.4.2 The Contractor must provide all standa/ds/fco be used with
this contract. The Contractor must be able to ve;rLf\/that the standards
are certified. Manufacturer's certificates of a/al^sis must be retained
by the Contractor and presented upon request.
2.4.4.3 No correction for impurities in
manufacturer's determined purity is 98 perc
EP>
needed if
standards may be usec
idit procedure. Standards on
2.4.4.4 Alternate methods of generati
equivalency is established through an
Tenax® may be stored for no more than
2.4.4.5 Flash Vaporization
2.4.4.5.1 Summary
2.4.4.5.1.1 A dilute solution^af oneNjr more organic
compounds in methanol is injected i^nto a^feeated zone in a
helium stream. The methanol and the ssdutepompounds are
rapidly vaporized/~anct--tkei^_s_wept onto a £o
instri
false ios
Contamination of a compound used as a standard will
resu/t in a decreased response. Contamination of one
id with another one to be used in the same
solution will result in incorrect responses for both
July, 1991
Page D - 20/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
compounds; and
Chemical reaction between two
mixture will result in low re
Absorption of a compound int;
particles will probably res
retained in the cartridge
consequent decreased res
iunds in a standard
for both.
rix of sorbent
it being
with
2.4.4.5.2.2 Chemical reactions /between compounds cat
deplete them from the mixtu/e and might also result in
unexpected reaction produces. /Use of/a\syringe for
consecutive injections fr/om the same/botrcle without cleaning
after each injection may/result in Erratic responses due to
buildup of sample residues ^-in the ysyrifnge. Rinse individual
syringes with methanol and ace^ne arid dry in a vacuum
syringe cleaner for -30 sec^jds. (/ heat gun is used to
heat the barrel of the syringe^during^-vacuum drying.)
NOTE: Syringes mus
injection to remove
injection is ne^dec
syringe must be usec
may result in erra\
be rigorously clamed ^fter each
.of sample. Evea if more than one
rom any given—source a freshly cleaned
injection?? Failure to do so
esponges/
2.4.4.5.3
vaporization unit, as
2.4.4.5.3^4 — Assemble
illustrated in Figure D/VCT-
low to 30 mL/min and the
to flow for approximately 30
'ibrate the system.
^volume of helium required to elute methanol
^idge is determined by using a thermal
directors Several different flow rates are
nd one wh^ch results in as sharp a methanol peak
without sweeping volatile solutes out of the
^efo^e it can be removed from the system.
Seh the helium flow to 30 mL/min and the heater
'C.j Place a clean (see Subsection 2.3.2) Tenax®
Line, and pass helium through the cartridge for
5/minutes.
July, 1991
Page D - 21/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.4.5.3.6 Using a heated syringe,
individual standard flask an aliquot;
flushing technique.
jtrfeve from the
is Ing the solvent
2.4.4.5.3.7 With the aliquot of jftie /^b&ndaro>L; and
aliquot of this solution would contain
!.3 ng.
.4.4.^&.2 /Each compound is measured into a 100 mL
volumetric /flask using a microsyringe. The flasks are
July, 1991
Page D - 22/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
.filled to the mark with spectrographic
the contents mixed thoroughly. Three/mi
solutions, when injected into the fl/sh,
the manner specified above, will de
ng of each compound on a sorbent cartridge
table above. The solution must
gra&e methanol and
•oliters of those
•aporization unit in
approximately 300
.as shown in the
f a day.
2.4.4.6 Static Dilution Bottle
2.4.4.6.1 Summary
2.4.4.6.1.1 A quantity of/liquid orgi
injected into a two-liter/ro/nd bottom
through a septum cap. Atte/ injections
flask is agitated and #eate< to acXie/e
vaporization.
Lc compound is
Xelium-filled flask
are completed, the
complete
2.4.4.6.1.2 Aliquots of the rfesultirfg^vapor are then
delivered to sorbent cartridges orxanalybical instruments.
The weight of each compound deliverer-is calculated from 1)
the density of CnTTfrjttid^,2)the volume>a£^ liquid injected
into the known Voluiae__of theb~o£tie-T~_arid 3) the volume of
the vapor aliquol
NOTE: The quantity""
dilution flask must
would result in a partiv
pressure a€—ambient
aliquofcs inject*
positive zrtres-sure'l
flaslc must notVef
pre/
Chloro
3-Dichlor
4-Dichlor
ompound injected into the
.tially less than that which
equal to its vapor
e. Vaporization of li-quid
,le must not result in a large
vapor aliquots from the
:antial vacuum. If these
Tatic responses may occur.
ion bottle technique for
rds has been validated for the following 22
ane
ene
-2-butene
butene
izene
1-Ethenyl-4-chlorobenzene
3 -Chloro-1-propene
1,4-Dichlorobutane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,1-Dichloroethane
2 -Chlorobutane
2-Chloroethoxyethene
1-Methylethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Butylbenzene
l-Methyl-4-(l-Methylethyl)
benzene
July, 1991
Page D - 23/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
. 2.4.4.6.1.4 Amounts used have ranged
of liquid samples. Repeatability of
mixture of the 22 compounds into th
percent relative standard deviatio^
the substance introduced, the
producing the flask standard, a;
of the instrument used to analy
Accuracy has not been establi
2.4.4.6.2 Interferences
teen. 0.3 and 4 fiL
injections of a
is about ±10
>jLon depends on
tiyidual
operator
2.4.4.6.2.1 Contaminatio^ of' a compc/und/used as a standard
will result in decreased/ re/ponse. /Contamination of one
compound with another one us^d in the /same vapor mixture
will result in an incorr«£t re^pcjnse/for both compounds.
2.4.4.6.2.2 Adsorption of vapois^inoleb^tles on the walls of
the bottle or on the septum will result rn^loss of material,
with a consequent decrease in responses. Thrfe is especially
likely when new,/ fresfriy— annealed bottles^are used.
Contamination o£ apparatus may~~r3^«*liLj.n_ adsorption loss or
provide unexpected s&urc~es~-r>£? compounds^n a mixture .
2.4.4.6.2.3 ChemicaSL react/onX between compounds can
deplete them from the Nmixteure/and might also result in
unexpected reaction products/ Use of a syringe for
consecutive— inflections from Che same bottle without cleaning
after each injection may re^ulc. in erratic responses due to
buildup of^s^3Bple\residues rn tw? syringe. Rinse individual
syririges/with mfethlafioT>and acetpne and dry in a vacuum
syringe/ cleaner/ for -30 se^sojids. (A heat gun is used to
heat $he barre/ of/the^syringe during vacuum drying.)
inj efc
rinse severs
at 300°C foi
Wash the 2-L flask with detergent and water,
times with deionized water, and dry in an oven
4 ytiours.
.6.3y2 ,£lace 30 3-mm glass beads inside the flask and
an/analytical balance to an accuracy of 0.01 g.
Fill the flask with deionized water to the
July, 1991
Page D - 24/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
level of the septum cap.
2.4.4.6.3.4 Weigh the flask contain!
water on an analytical balance to at;
2.4.4.6.3.5 The weight of the wa;
bottle is the difference between/
calculated below:
e glass beads and
uracy of 0.01 g.
where:
Vf - volume/of/flask, \fL, /
with beads and
with beads, g.
\^
2.4.4.6.3.6 Two methods have been use^to l)&ad the dilution
flask with organ^c~~coKp»Beiitsfor standard/ 1) direct
injection of eadh coanp_ound separaTre4y_J.ntp the flask and 2)
a single direct rnjeXtiorT~of~^ previously' prepared mixture
of compounds.
NOTE: These methods
indistinguishable resul
shown to produce
jthod involves\ injecting each compound (one
ito the flaskA The flask is inverted
itorfe~cTHLon wicfa/the syringe in place through
£or the beads to remove any
the/syringe needle. The second
tng a master solution by
mL of each component into a culture vial
fch a septum cap. After all the compounds
added, the vial is agitated to produce a
homogeneous T^quid mixture. The vial is then recapped
Ch a nefc^septum. Aliquots of this master solution
Amoved andyinjected into the dilution flask as
the same manner as indicated above; and
method involves retrieving a clean, dry 2-L
training 70 3-mm glass beads and flushing the
helium for a period of five minutes. At
/f the flushing process, immediately cap with
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
volume of each compound (one at ya t£me) or from the
mixture solution into the flask'while the glass beads
are agitated by the stirring War at the maximum
setting of the magnetic stir/er^ Invert the flask
after each injection with the syringe in^place through
the septum, in order for tKe jjeads
liquid remaining on the syj^/ge needle .
substances have been inproJiuced, place the fi^sk it
the oven at 60°C for 3y minutes to equilibrate/\»tore
the flask in the oven/at/€0°C until needed. Bottles
are stable for one wek^fter
NOTE: The technique of /injecting a/solution of targeted
compounds rather than i^ndivrdual irijecrion of specific
compounds is preferred ifxmany syostamces are involved,
because it is more rapid, anti\the master solution can be
used over a long period if it i^^refrigerated at 0°C.
Before use, the refrigerated solution is allowed to sit at
room temperature fojrabout an hour. rtxis recommended that
a total less than 90 /UTTrf—liquid be injecTsed and a total
less than 20,00(\/iL\ei-^£as be remo"v
2.4.4.6.3.7 Remove\the\flas>
magnetic stirrer for\app\p
tEe~~"~o/ven and place on the
Cely 15 seconds.
2.4.4.6.3.8 Place the sVrin&e to be used in the extraction
procedure^-ln~^thfi oven at cvO°C\to prevent condensation in the
syringe/during delivery. Ufcing\the heated syringe, insert
its n#edlXthrfxugn\ the^ septuihyanji pump three times slowly.
.3.9 Af/er ttie thir>i-aump, fill the syringe to
Amately 2.5 percenbxgrea/cer volume than needed. After
jond pause / withdrawtne needle from the Mininert
se'p-tAim vkiye/ Flush the excess sample from the syringe,
then ocaw a small quantity of air into the syringe to retard
diffusion^-of sample through the syringe tip. The aliquot
must tx useoxmmediately.
If the-^sample is to be injected into a clean
sorbent cartridge, the tip of the needle is inserted to the
center of che s;orbent bed. Then the plunger is depressed
over a 10 second, period while the needle tip is being
withdrawn abput half the distance to the end of the bed.
.4.6.3. ill. if. the sample is injected directly into the
instrument, injection is made in the normal
cmer vmless column-head freeze-trapping (cryofocusing) is
being\employed, in which case the plunger is depressed over
about a :tW second period.
July, 1991
Page D - 26/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
. 2.4.4.6.3.12 If a sample is too large/to fie injected in one
step, two or more injections may be mz.de J This causes no
complication for injection into a so/bem: cartridge, but
cryofocusing-must be employed when .multiple injections are
made directly into a gas chromatog/raph.
2.4.4.6.4 Calculations
2.4.4.6.4.1 Volumes to be iryfr'&^uced into the
flask are calculated by working/backwards from the quantity
of material to be delivered/ JOT example, if a 500 ng
delivery is needed, it could iSonvenierfbiy be accomplished by
using a 50 p.L syringe conraiping 10 /ig/j/L of compound.
Therefore:
50 /*L syringe x 10 ng/}il
500 ng
2.4.4.6.4.2 If the typical volum<
then to get that concentration (10
would have to adoZTTTfrS—mg_^of^ liquid com
The calculation(wo
= quantity of liaui
of 10 ng/>L.
thexflask is 2.065 L,
:he flask, one
id to the flask.
10 ng/juL x 2.065 L
flask concentration
10
x
. 65 mg
2.4.4.6.4^3—-if the density "bJ the solution was 0.9726 g/mL
(or 0.3726 mg//IhO, then tKfe voi^ume of solution needed to add
to ther fLasTT-to maintain a oonceptration of 10 ng/AiL or a
deli/era*le of\OQxfls~>wo.uld bV/21.23 /iL, as calculated:
2/.6S mg/0.9;
21.23
It/is not practical to deliver and measure
microliter, so, in practice, 21 pL would be
the deliverable would be calculated: (21
mL = 0.00989 mg/mL = 0.00989
fractions
used.
x 0.972^
This^s^/equivalent to 9.89 ng//iL, so a 50-/J.L
injection of\the vapor compound from the static dilution
flask woulbd contain: 9.89 ng//iL x 50 ^L = 494.5 ng of
compound delivered
enneation Calibration Generator
2.4V4.7.1.]/ A permeation calibration generator is designed
July, 1991
Page D - 27/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
to allow the permeation of gas through/Teflon® or other
plastic material at a constant rate im a/water bath at
constant temperature to generate tear atmospheres.
2.4.4.7.1.2 The permeation tube fs ma~bXby scaling a liquid
chemical in a tube made of some /ernreablemateria"^ It is
essential that the chemical be in j£he liquid s-satero< the
permeation tube to operate prc
chemical is a gas at atmospheric
in the liquid state under ics
in the permeation tube. Ttfe
with a non-permeable plug
Ly. In many cas*
'pressure, but is
saturation vapor pressure
je is sealed at both ends
2.4.4.7.1.3 Permeation/of ^ehe pollutant vapor within the
tube occurs through the^axposea^s/dewalls because of the
concentration gradient thab-exists Between the inner and
outer tube walls. By passing oifferetvt flows of diluent gas
over the tube, gases of varying concentrated on can De
generated. If the tube is held at a Constant temperature,
the permeation r^te~~w±ii-~cgmain constantNv^By measuring the
weight loss at mis^jjonstantteffipe^atiire over a given period
of time, the per^athkorT~ra-Ce--may be determined. The output
rate of the tube will\emain/4ss€nt±aiiy constant until
nearly all of the lixmi\in/th.e/ tube has permeated through
the walls. In generalx. pexme/tion tubes can be used to
generate known pollutan\ con/entrations between 0.7 to 200
ppbv.
2.4.4.7.2
^tion device can be used in the
FES permeation rate must be
iermeatidtr-iate, R, is determined
In essence, the tube is weighed, then
jerature bath (±1°C) for a period of time.
ayed and reweighed. This process is repeated
calculate a permeation rate at that
difference between initial and
Lght (ng^yciivided by time (min) determines the
:e at that specific temperature.
Eq. D/VOA-2
Permeation rate, ng/min;
Weight change, ng; and
Time, minutes.
July, 1991
Page D - 28/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.4.7.2.2 The permeation rate can be ,£al£ulated either
manually, as shown in the above equati/on./or recorded
automatically. At different temperaure/, different
permeation rates can be calculated.
2.4.4.7.2.3 Permeation tubes shouZd bekept
temperature specified by the manufa
Changes in temperature as smal^>as 0.1°C can sigrtificantsLy
affect the permeation rate. /Tubes should initially
allowed to equilibrate for 2U hours. After small changes in
temperature (1 to 5°C) , th/tube shoul^Kbe allowed to
equilibrate for at least )(aly an houj
2.4.4.7.2.4 A permeation tfube system/has been developed for
application of loading Rtxown s-fc^n/lards onto Tenax®
cartridges for use in deteruuming tWe relative response
factor and the column performahce^ evki^tion (CPMX) of the
GC/MS-COMP system in conjunction wi^h thexfJLash vaporization
system.
2.4.4.7.2.5 In
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.4.7.2.8 The following routine shoi/ld/fce followed when
Tenax® cartridges are loaded with deu/tera/ted standards via a
permeation system: 1) determine th
be loaded, 2) select the permeatio
loading conditions to be used, 4)
load the cartridges, 6) calculat
loaded, 7) ensure the integrity^of
and 8) pack and store the
er of cartridges to
tubes>\3) determine the
system, 5)
pmpounds
iire,
cart;
Obtain a copy of the
Monitoring Coordinat
Determine the numb
external standard:
objectives;
from the
standards and
tisfy the sampling
Check the permeation noteb<
laboratory) to see which
available £6T~t&e^£ieeded standards
perme
ted in the
es are
'A
Select onlV ttifc
rates are stable
;ion tubeswhose permeation
NOTE: A permeation rkte Xs7 considered stable when the mean
permeation rate has a coefficient of variation (CV) of less
than 10 percent. The mean permeation rate is calculated
using theiast riye indiviHualNpermeation rates. Do not use
penneatfionx-trities with permeation\rates below 100 ng/min or
above/1 ?/105
(n a bound ncr€eBo<}k assigned for the specific project,
^prepare/a t/ble includjing: 1) the numbers of the
be used, 2) the names of the compounds, and
rresponding mean permeation rates.
2.4.4.7.3 Calcul
^.7,
to be
formula:
:ions
For
\onto a
Compound, calculate the amounts needed
fenax® cartridge using the following
P x t x
Eq. D/VOA-3
/Amount loaded of compound onto Tenax® tube, ng;
Permeation rate of specific compound, ng/min;
July, 1991
Page D - 30/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Total time of loading of coppoytnd onto Tenax®
tube, minutes;
Flow rate through the Ten^x®/cartridge, mL/min;
and
Exhaust flow rate,
NOTE: The four variables G, t,
loading conditions. Any three
one calculated from the equat
2.4.4.7.3.2 The following Restrictions must be followed to
minimize error: 1) do not /load for leysXthan two minutes,
2) do not load with a cartridge flow /beLow 50 mL/min or
above 150 mL/min, 3) do yot/operate/the/system with a total
flow below 250 mL/min.
2.4.4.7.3.3 If the GC/MS syst&aneedsxto operate in the
range of 200-500 ng per analyte, then thV>analyst must
generate standards concurrent with thax^rangjs. Fixing three
of the four vari^bTe3~-o£-ttieabove equation/will enable
calculation of l(he needed loadiiTe-&ato the Tenax® tube.
2.4.4.7.3.4 As
provided to assist tl
parameters of the pei
standards on QA/QC
OBJECT!
cartr
GIV
!g calculations are
'determining operating
fube system in generating
and chloroform onto a
per analyte.
te
0 ng/min for chlorobenzene
.0 ng/min for chloroform
0 ng/min)(4 min)j x [(80 mL/min)/(80
in+F2) ]
f270 ng/min)(4 min)(80 mL/min)]/200 ng}
mli/min
352 mL/min
- 80
July, 1991
Page D - 31/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Now, since all tubes are in the permeation7device together,
the flow.(F2) for chloroform will be T52 /mL/min. Therefore,
the loading on the Tenax<8> tube for chloroform must be
calculated to verify that it falls/withinta^e 200-500 ng per
tube loading.
Chloroform
G - (P)(C)[F1/(F1+F2)
G = (520 ng/min)(4
mL/min)]
G - 385 ng
All values obtained are/wit
(80 mL/min)/(80 mL/min + 352
NOTE: Permeation tubes may
materials. The following
in a properly ventilated glove
cc^eptable range.
proc
oxic or carcinogenic
puld be carried out
Wear nylon
gloves when handling permeation tubes:
2.4.4.7.3.5 Locate J^iechambe?s~~-i»--3diich the selected
permeation tubes\re\sto1ceTh—7With a long?glass hook, remove
the selected permeatioh tubes/ fr/6nrthe--&torage chamber and
transfer immediately\to\he /loading chamber of the
permeation system. \ \/ /
NOTE: Wheji-a>-~cartridge iS not: being loaded, a dummy
cartridge is plafeed in theNLoading position.
to the side where the
^artridgej will be "fovadedvand allow the system to
Srate for/90/miniites before loading cartridges with
inerated /tes£ atmospheres.
DiX/ert the nitrogen flow to the side that will
forxj-pading cartridges and insert the Tenax®
theXihamber.
test at
stopwatch and immediately direct the
nsphe^res gas flow through the cartridge.
2.4.4.7.3.
Ca
desired as folL
tculate the time needed to load the amounts
rs :
pern
ition
>P)
ie calculation only on the compound whose
zfube has the highest or lowest permeation rate.
July, 1991
Page D - 32/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4. A. 7.3.10 At the calculated time , k. otite the two
stopcocks to direct gas flow away fron/th/e cartridge being
loaded.
2.4.4.7.3.11 Handling the cartridge with^a^Kimwipe®, remove
the cartridge and return it to its cuTbire tube^. Seal the
tube, then label with the follomng/informa>and 3) the date.
2.4.4.7.3.12 Prepare a Chafr-
information concerning
2.4.4.8 Storage of Standards in Car/
2.4.4.8.1 Secure the cartridg
glass wool plug to avoid breakage^
deuterated standards, label the top
following symbol: D*.
NOTE: * The star indi.
loaded onto the cartr
participant's code.
2.4.4.8.2 Store the carti
freezer until they are ready\to'
2.4.4.8.3 For
cartridge usirig the ge
:-Custody sheet with the
Che tube.
Imax® tube with a
xansport. For
jew cap with the
.rds have been
also be added to the
sealed paint can in the
ent to the field.
late the amount loaded onto a
2.4.4.8.
use in
2.4.5 Instrument
The instrume
Tenax® sampli
desorption c
analysis.
approximat
should be/10 /mL/min
be coole/i wi£h liquid nitrogen
tion tubes to the GC/MS for
ie analysis of volatile organics on
Table D/VOAT- 2. The thermal
port Va^fo valve are maintained at 250°C during
is set to scan the mass range from
;lium purge gas through the desorption chamber
capillary trap on the inlet manifold should
July, 1991
Page D - 33/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4r6 Instrumental Analysis
2.4.6.1 Initial Start-Up
2.4.6.1.1 Prior to instrument calibrate
helium purge flows (through the desorp
flow to the GC/MS are set at approxi
mL/min, respectively. If applicable
set at 2-4 mL/min.
2.4.6.1.2 After the column and
assembled, condition the column
analysis,
ier gas
2.4.6.1.3 The MS and data sy
manufacturer's instructions.
300 amu, the scan time should be
not to exceed one second per scan.
general operating conditions for the
2.4.6.1.4 Once the en
should prepare a detai
the operation of the s
2.4.6.1.5 Turn on the powl
line pressures for the foil
• Helium:
mponents are
the manufaturer.
2.4.6.1.6
should
2.4.6.1."
set manifol
temperature to
60 psig
psig
30/psig
according to the
should be from 35 to
ive scans per peak and
PAT- 2 outlines
et up, the user
procedure describing
sed.
ss-flow controllers and set
desorption and GC system
nstrument requirements.
master power switch to the chromatograph,
to 105 ± 5°C, and set source ionization
July, 1991
in the^power^to the thermal desorption unit and
atur^s for the valve, trap, and transfer line on the
control box of the thermal desorption unit
manufacturer' s specification. Typical values are:
275°C
250°C
210°C
Page D - 34/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
.t is cold and the
Lng helium through
reducing
irmal
2.4.6.2 Thermal Desorption of Tenax® Adsorbent Tu
2.4..6.2.1 Initially, the thermal desorptio
Tenax® cartridges are placed inside while
them. This allows oxygen to be purged fr/m
oxidative degradation of Tenax®. Then,
desorption cycle, helium gas continues
cartridge to purge the organic vapors anaXyte~~aRd/standard are
determined prior to the analys\s o/f the sample and this relative
system response is used to oatermlne/the quantity of compound
present on the sample cartridg
2.4.6.2.4 The/followihg outlines\typ\cal steps associated with
thermal desozptLatTTislngV the NuTecPk device. They are presented as
a guideline/to/follow yherTTIs-inE thi^/or similar equipment.
Remove the ser^led^^paint /can containing the desired
(Tenax® gart/idge from~-«ne freezer.
the freezer in the laboratory designated
for-vpartr^4ge storage ONLY for this purpose.
Inadvertent storage of containers of solvent in this
1 resnlt in contamination of all cartridges
in the\£yfeezer and will compromise the
since organic solvents are frequently target
for quantitative analysis. Verify that the
personnel are not involved in any process
jses open containers of organic solvents, as
Ivent vapor will contaminate a Tenax®
exposed to this atmosphere in only a few
thus compromising the quantitative and/or
tive assay.
July, 1991
Page D - 35/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Open the sealed lid of the paintca/( using a flat-
bladed screwdriver, beverage can opener, or other
convenient tool for this purpc/se.<
NOTE: The cartridge will b
with a Teflon-lined screw /ap,
ss steel tube
Remove a single Tenax® oGb^from the paint
the paint can and replace /In the freezer, and
the Teflon cap of the/deaorption chamber.
Remove the cartridf
forceps.
the shipping tube using
NOTE: DO NOT TOUCikTHE "GARXRIpfcE WITH YOUR HANDS!
Organic compounds present on tjhe fingertips can be
sufficient to compromise^the analysis. If the
cartridge is inadvertently tbvched\make careful note
of the circumstances in both theM^nsti^iment log and
the projec,J
Insert the\arbridge"~"±nmediately into the desorption
chamber. Close\he Tefloi!^cap~Trf-^the desorption
chamber, and iViiti^te/th/ timing of the eight-minute
desorption cycle\ DdrLng this time period, helium is
flowing through th^ desorption chamber.
2.4.6.2.5
the desorpti,
are automa
At
the
eign^-m
the
.ute desorption cycle, turn
ECT mode. The following steps
liable instruments.
e program;
feating of the nickel trap;
:a acquisition system; and
off~"th.e trkp after it has heated to 250°C.
2.4.6.2.8
system in an
thermal desorption unit valve back to desorb
cartridge. At the end of the run, the GC
to 30°C, and the data acquisition will stop
1 compounds have eluted.
thi:s procedure for each Tenax® cartridge to be
om GC/MS runs are normally processed by the data
mated program which locates the compounds of
July, 1991
Page D - 36/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
interest in the data set, quantifies those c
calibration data are available, and prints
repprt will present the quantification par
those compounds identified and quantifiab
typically list those compounds which wer/ searc
sample, indicate which ones were not foAnd
characteristics and quantification result/ for
found, and present comments for the operator's bene
the criteria which caused a peak to/Se\rejected
for any search which failed. The fnfotmation in the repof ^
also be saved in a DS file for ar/hiyal storage and DS transfer
purposes.
mds for which
ort. A typical
rs and result for
report will
for in the
identifying
h were
as
or the^benter^scan
ise
sue
.d contain 4. fide composed one entry
each/enKry, the library
2.4.6.2.9 The DS library sho
for each compound of interes
contains the compound name, i^mas^-s^ct/urn from the Mass
Spectral Data Base, its absolute^setentio/ time, and its retention
time relative to perfluorotoluene or^2-dictilorobenzene -d4, the
retention time marker, as determined fr^a^auttieT^ic standards.
Response lists (RL) are compound specific D5\files>containing the
quantitative calibrata^n^SCa-fcu^each of the Ca^et compounds.
2.4.6.2.10 The automated ftrocec
chromatographic peaks coXresTjondii
reverse library search
window:
attempts t^ locate
tp target/compounds by a
oi/owing criteria for scan
For intei
candards: ±>100\seconds from library scan
nuraber\
For /ingle comp\>urldsT^x+20 s\c/nds from the calculated
Corner gr/Sups
Peak ic
Peak selectic:
Lon:
and +20 seconds from the
calculated seconds for the earliest
and latest eluting members of the
group, respectively.
As determined by the laboratory.
The scan list is partitioned in
order of increasing distance from
the center of the scan window,
except for isomer groups.
The
renti
dichld
located a
benz
tojfaated procedure begins by attempting to locate
^ .me markers (perfluorotoluene and 1,2-
If the early eluting standard, PFT, is not
.rnina' message is printed and the procedure is
<-dL
July, 1991
Page D - 37/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
terminated. If only the late eluting internal standard is not
found, 'the procedure uses the scan number catlcuiated from the
library retention time for this standard a.p a ^default value.
NOTE: Alternatively, the operator may s^ecifjr,scan^numbers for
the internal standards and then initiate t>le rema^nder^eif the
automated procedure. The procedure cjrcles through tke compounds
in the library list attempting to lojjTa^^each compound"!^ turi
i/dentified in the search for
partitioned to order
of the search
are sequentially
/compound in order to
2.4.6.2.12 If one or more peaks
a target compound, the resulting
the scans in increasing distanc
window. The mass spectra in t
compared to the library entry
the mass weighted purity, fit
2.4.6.2.13 If the mass spectrum at^fckg peakxmaximum passes either
of the above tests, the procedure attempts to quantify the peak.
If the target is a single compound, only tnexfirst^peak to pass
the qualitative criterLi~T^~-p4^i£essed further/^X£j the target is
an isomer group, all peaks detected~~&y-~€tie^search are processed
through the qualitativeXfilterSr-aacLall that~pa£s these filters
are quantified. If no peaks sore foupd tfy~~th«-^sjsarch or pass
through the qualitative filters, a/"not detected" entry is placed
in the report. \ \/ /
jst va
to,
NOTE: The failu£e_fif
necessarily prove the
Interfering tfomp
may cause ttie
It is also/po
rfit/purLty,/but have,
absence/of af partic
DS procedure rails /to
the data oy^a person
is necessary rsj: con
a peak to\sarisfy these criteria does not
:he^corapound in the sample.
or\ low level\ of^the compound of interest
de of the acceptance range.
le values for fit/purity and
identification. If the
ar/compoundM-s7 of crucial importance and the
ocate the compound, manual inspection of
killed in the interpretation of GC/MS data
rmation.
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.7.2 Frequency
2.4,7.2.1 Prior to the analyses of any s
calibration standards, the Contractor mus
GC/MS meets the standard mass spectral
is accomplished through the analysis of
(BFB). The instrument conditions requ
the BFB mass spectrum are given in Ex
blanks, or
ablish that a given
Criteria. This
>enzene
;ition of
NOTE: BFB criteria must be met bef/ore
Any samples analyzed when BFB critzteriA have not been met will
require reanalysis at no cost to/the/Agency.
'analysis
lye hour
to"~sneet
e D/VQAT-
2.4.7.2.2 Each GC/MS used for
checked daily or once per ea
whichever is most frequent,
criteria for BFB as outlined in
corrective action which could change
performance check for BFB (e.g., ion
column replacement, etc.), the instrument
be verified immediatel
performance check req
*st
inical
aff
soul
of the twe
2.4.7.3 Procedure
2.4.7.3.1 Prepare a 25
Prepare fresh BEB-*eJ,ution evei
solution has jiegraded
ion of BFB in methanol.
six months or sooner if the
>e performance
riod of operation,
acceptance
3. Also, whenever
the instrument
Ing or repair,
:prma^ice check must
-hour/daily
NOTE: The ,25
volume.
a 1 //L i
2.4.7.3'
2.4.7.3.3 Se£
and injjti^te data
operator's manual.
m
procee
obtaining
_!Sed with a 2 fiL injection
a 50 ng//xL solution of BFB if
BFB into the GC/MS.
parameters for the acquisition of the data
".on by following instructions in the
lent parameters (e.g., lens voltages,
adjusted to give the relative ion abundances
3 as well as acceptable resolution and peak
iximate relative abundances cannot be
•ce or quadrapoles may require cleaning
.rer's instructions. The Contractor must
"relative ion abundances for BFB before
(pie anslysis. Samples analyzed before
ion abundances specified in Table D/VOAT- 3
July, 1991
Page D - 39/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
must be reanalyzed at no expense to the Agency
2.4.7.4 Technical Acceptance Criteria
2.4.7.4.1 Prior to the analysis of any
calibration standards, the Laboratory
GC/MS system meets the mass spectral ion
the instrument performance check sol
2.4.7.4.2 The instrument performs
injected once at the beginning
samples or standards are to be
2.4.7.5 Corrective Action
ice/check standard must be
12-hojac^period during which
feed.
2.4.7.5.1 If the BFB acceptance
be retuned. It may be necessary to
quadrupoles, or take other actions to
criteria.
2.4.7.5.2 BFB accept.
standards, performance^va
are analyzed. Any sampl
criteria have not been me
additional cost to the Agen
2.4.7.6 Documentat ion
Reporting re
2.4.8 Calibration of
2.4.8.1 S
iteria Are not met, the MS must
ion source, or
Leve^Ci^e acceptance
met before any
or required blanks
.nalyzed when tuning
reanalysis at no
ihibit B.
2.4.8.1.1
s tandards tha
of interest. The1
me
i'trix.iaterfere-
approach, the analyst must utilize internal
in analytical behavior to the compounds
must further demonstrate that the
tandard is not affected by method or
es. rru^rnal standards specified for this
al and tinal markers for the MS (see part
standards. The internal markers are:
(m/z)
(PFT)
ichlorobenzene - d<,
217
146
2.4.8.1.
ounds specified as internal markers have been
July, 1991
Page D - 40/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
also used successfully as surrogate spikes,
generally unique retention times.
;c=mse of their
2.4.8.1.3 Prior to the analysis of samplers a^d required blanks
and after the instrument performance che^k standard criteria have
been met, each GC/MS system must be cal/bra^fed at axminimum of
five concentrations in an initial calibration se^uenc^xor with
the calibration check standard in a d4ll/ calibration sequence, to
determine instrument sensitivity and^^t^ie linearity of OG/MS
response for the target compounds.
2.4.8.1.4 A check of the calibr/z
every 12 hours.
2.4.8.2 Frequency
.ticm curve/teust be performed once
coi
2.4.8.2.1 Each GC/MS system mus
contract, whenever the Contractor
may change or affect the initial calibr
source cleaning or repair, column replaceme'
daily calibration acce£t£
Calibration is accfomplisted by mean"
on ci
calibrated upon award of the
ctive action which
teria (i.e., ion
.), or if the
n met.
internal standard
Lteria have not*
calibration procedure
rej
response factors (RRFs).
2.4.8.2.2 If time remains^in\the/12/hour time period after
meeting the acceptance critHriaXEor/the initial calibration,
samples may be analyzed. ItVs no/c necessary to analyze a
continuing calibration standarcl if\the initial calibration
standard that/is the same concentration as the continuing
calibration/stajKterd meets the concinujLng calibration acceptance
criteria. /Quantify ail I#an5p4e result/ against the initial
calibration standard £hat is thexgame concentration as the
continuir
g calibrati
n
2.4.8.2x3 Ifxt.ime/do$
with the rnjecti*
new analysis &f^ the
performed
:S not remain in the 12-hour period beginning
the instrument performance check solution, a
.strument performance check standard must be
of tRe^i^itial calibration curve must be
12 hours.
•e calibration standards containing all the
piked on clean Tenax® tubes as outlined in part
^Generations outlined in Table D/VOAT- 4.
July, 1991
Page D - 41/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.8.3.2 To each of these tubes, add knowr/concentrations of
internal markers (300 ng level), as outlined inpart 2.3.6,
and. analyze each tube according to part 2/3.4SxEach tube must
also contain the three surrogate standar/s Csee p^rt 2.3 6) at the
300 ng level.
2.4.8.3.3 Analyze according to part
2.4.8.4 Calculations
2.4.8.4.1 Tabulate peak height /5r area resooiiaes against
concentration for each corapound/anci internal standard. Table
D/VOAT- 5 contains primary quanti/ation i/ms/to be used for each
target compound and internal 4tanoa
target compound and the internal static
equation:
where:
factors (RRF) for each
Cd using the following
Eq. D/VOA-4
The RRF
and concent
the compound.
cea^respoftse for the\com)aound to be measured,
res^onste ion for Che "internal standard,
neaWst internal standard, ng,
ipound to be measured, ng.
ound is calculated using the values of area
'specific internal standard associated with
July, 1991
. 8.4.3 Ini^biate quimtitation of the RRFs for the target
comn«rtindF~3nd crektion of^-she library in the data system. The
'aWrage RRF muVt beXcalculated for each compound by averaging the
values obtained ^t the five concentrations as specified in part
L3.4.2.2 and outl\ine\l in Table D/VOAT- 4.
^.4 Internal standard responses and retention times in all
indardsmust bet evaluated during or immediately after data
acquisition
2.4.8.4.5^Sheck /the relative response factor of the calibration
Page D - 42/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
compounds in the initial calibration to see tKat^the percent
relative standard deviation (%RSD) is within/±3(/percent.
SD
X 100
Eq. D/VOA-5
where:
SD - standard deviation, an<
RRF = mean RRF from the initial/calibration.
2.4.8.4.6 A percent difference/XD/ of the/da^ly relative
response factor (12-hour) comp/red/to the/average relative
response factor from the initial 4mrve is'calculated for each
compound, utilizing the following eqttat^onv
- RRF
- x 100
Eq. D/VOA-6
where:
%D
RRFC -
Percent dif
Average RRF rrom
Continuing (12-hour)
2.4.8.5 Technical Accj
ace Criteri
2.4.8.5.1
within ±30 >£ec<
standard.
/curve; and
check.
nds
time for\ny
ifest
internal standard must be
y (12 -hour) calibration
2.4.8.5
RRFs ii
2.4.8;5.3
within__±_30_ percen
\e percent /elative
mdard deviation (XRSD) of the
•e must be within ±30 percent.
continuing calibration sequence, %D must be
.ected^^sin/current profile (SICP) of the internal
•nitored and evaluated for each standard. The
.ernal standard must not change by more than
:ention time for any internal standard changes
ronds from the latest daily (12-hour)
July, 1991
Page D - 43/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
calibration standard, the chromatographic 535,
for malfunctions, and corrections made as
corrections are made, reanalyze samples wl
system was malfunctioning.
2.4.8.6.2 If the %RSD of the RRFs in
within ±30 percent, the relative resp
are calculated and reported.
must be inspected
fored. When
(ere analyzed while
s not
ounds
2.4.8.6.3 If the retention time
by more than 30 seconds from the
calibration standard, the chrom
for malfunctions, and correct!
2.4.8.6.4 If the SICP area fo
more than a factor of 40 percent,
must be inspected for malfunction an
appropriate. If the analysis of a subse
indicates that the systemis functioning
nee
corrections may not be/requi]
outside the limits must be--cg_^analyze
then the laboratory mus\ demonsti
system is functioning pr
analysis of a standard
corrections are made and the\SIC
are inside the contract limit
the first analysis—tt considere
of the laboratory. Th
with SICPs w/thifPtfte, co
Narrative
internal standard changes
,12-hour) continuous
m must be inspected
ired.
pro
standard changes by
spectrometric system
ons made as
le or standard
then
the
iis /must
(40<
efore,
ami
lim:
rrect
2.4.8.7 Documi
Reporti
2.4.9 Sample Analysis
.-
2.4.9.1 /Summary
lie standards>*£th SICP areas
rrections are made,
ss spectrometric
'accomplished by the
the SICP criteria. After
reas for all internal standards
percent), then the problem with
.ave been within the control
data from the analysis
Document in the SDG
'e actions taken.
are listed on Exhibit B.
July, 1991
lysi^s of samples, establish the appropriate GC/MS
,ze the instrument performance check standard
GC/MS ^ys^em. If time remains in the 12-hour period,
out analysis of a continuous calibration
ot/remain in the 12-hour period since the
performance check standard, both the
ch^ck solution and the continuous calibration
zeja before sample analysis may begin.
Page D - 44/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.9.2 P-ro.cedure
Analyze samples according to the GC/MS proo4du/e outlined in item
2.4.6.
2.4.9.3 Calculations
2.4.9.3.1 Percent Area Response Change /%ARC):
percent area response change (%ARC) /fb^the sample/blan
compared to the most recent daily oral
for each of the internal standard/co
equation:
anal}
ration standard analyses
ounds using the following
Eq. D/VOA-7
where:
Area response d
surrogate standar
analysis, and
Area response of the
surrpgatie
int
:ernal marker or
,n tne\sample/blank
intei
ards in the
rker or
recent
calibratt?
andard.
2.4.9.3.2 Retention Timk Sh
time shift (RTS) between t
recent continuing calibratic
internal markers and surrogat
equation:
where:
(R/S)/ T^tttii'ate the retention
ank analysis and the most
rd analysis, for each of the
standards, using the following
Eq. D/VOA-8
'tension
tion time of the internal marker or
surrogate standards in a sample/blank, and
recetion time of the internal marker or
standards in the most recent
conTsojuiin£>calibration standard.
percent recovery (%R): Calculate the
overy using the following equation:
Eq. D/VOA-9
y determined by analysis, ng, and
July, 1991
Page D - 45/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Qa = quantity added to sample/blank,
2.4.9.4 Technical Acceptance Criteria
2.4.9.4.1 The sample must be analyzed
the BFB performance check, initial cal,
calibration technical acceptance cri
2.4.9.4.2 The sample must be deso
contract holding times.
2.4.9.4.3 The sample must have,
technical acceptance criteria
batch.
tern meeting
inuing
and analyzed withiri
meeting the blank
tal VOCs per Tenax®
2.4.9.4.4 The percent recovery
sample must be within the recovery
Surrogate Recovery Limits
Compound
Benzene-ds
Chlorobenzene-ds
1,4-D ichlorobenzene-
2.4.9.4.5
s tandards f
internal stfan
analysis,/or
the surrogates in the
follows:
2.
-150%
50-150%
50-150%
2.4.9.4/6
standards mus"
sample ancN4;he nt
analysis.
^or each of the internal
40 percent compared to the
/continuing calibration
from initial calibration.
7
Itioh time sftiit for each of the internal
Lessr than or equal to 30 seconds between the
recent continuing calibration standard
1.4.7
July, 1991
targetxconipOTand concentrations must not exceed the
of eke initraj-^ycalibration range and no compound ion
(excluding tfe&^comfcound peaks in the solvent front) may saturate
th4 detector.
Corrective Actibn
If the/ sample technical acceptance criteria for the
sur~rogat'e>ssand i/nte/nal markers are not met, check calculations,
surrogs.te antikj^nternal standard solutions, and instrument
performance^. It^ay be necessary to recalibrate the instrument or
Page D - 46/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
take- other corrective action procedures to raaet
internal standard technical acceptance criteria/
surrogate and
2.4.9.5.2 If the Contractor needs to anaWze^more than one (1)
sample to have all the target compounds yithin the initial
calibration range and to have all compovind /Co^as not^-saturating the
detector (excluding the peaks in the syolvent froftO , contact
Sample Management Office (SMO) . SMO
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
san
for -io.ns unique to the component of interest
2.4., 10.1.4 For comparison of standard an
spectra, mass spectra obtained on the Co^tra,ctor'
required. Once obtained, these standar
identification purposes only if the Contractor's
daily instrument performance requiremeS^r for BFB
spectra may be obtained from the run/us>d to obtain reference
RRTs.
component mass
GC/MS are
used for
ts the
ise standard
may
2.4.10.1.5 The requirements for^qualitative
comparison of mass spectra are as fallows: '
rification by
All ions present in theAtandard ma'ssy^pectra at a relative
intensity greater than UNRerceht/(mo%t abundant ion in the
spectrum equals 100 percent^Nnjost beC^resent in the sample
spectrum;
The relative intensities of such ions nJt*st a^ree within ±20
percent between /he stan3ai?4^ands ample spfectra. (Example:
For an ion with Wi afewndance ofMTTreT?6^nt in the standard
spectra, the corr^po\ding~sa^rple_^bundanfce must be between
30 and 70 percent) ;"
For each internal stan&ardY determine that thearea measured
in the sample extract ha^s no/ changed by >40 percent from
the area^ate'Ssttted during ohe aost recent continuing
calibration checkXor by >50\perfcfint from the mean area
measured dCSin^inYtial calib\ati>on. If either criterion is
not rp4t,/remedia^L actiort^ust b$r taken to improve
sens
greater /har/25 percenS^in the sample spectrum but not
Candard spectrum must be considered and
for b^y the analyst making the comparison. All
neetirtgxthe identification criteria must be
their^pectra. For all compounds below the
CRQL report the^tuay value followed by a "J", e.g., "3J."
.1.6
COB
criteria in item
lound cannot be verified by all of the
.0.1.5, but in the technical judgment of the
(ass spectral interpretation specialist the identification is
:ractor shall report that identification and
:ation.
?rrect
pro
then
with quant
font
Lfid
July, 1991
Page D - 48/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.10.2 Non-Target Compounds
2.4.10.2.1 A library search shall be exec
sample components for the purpose of tent
For this purpose, the 1990 (or more rece/t)
Library, containing 50,000 spectra, sh
generated library search routines mus
routines that would misrepresent the
when compared to each other. Up to
greatest apparent concentration no
use
•ary or
•rganic
tentatively identified via a forw
Only after visual comparison of
library searches will the mass
assign a tentative identifica
search routines must not use
misrepresent the library or urtkoown
other.
in
2.4.10.2.2 Guidelines For Making Tentat
for non- target
identification .
of the NISI
raputer
ion
unkrft
compounds
Exhibit
;earch of the NIST Library.
with the nearest
retation specialist
Computer Generated library
routines that would
when compared to each
ification:
Relative intensities
(ions greater
should be present
lmajor ionSr~ia__che reference spectrum
the mosp abundant ion)
th,e samlespec!
The relative intensities
within ±20 percent.
of 50 peirpetrt-of the
sample .fon abundance must
ions ftrei
^ent/in sample
ie major ions should agree
For an ion with an abundance
^spectra, the corresponding
between 30 and 70 percent);
refeNr^nce spectrum should be
ictrunfr
actrx
present fn the sample^spectrum but not in the reference
lid/be reviewed for possible background
presence of coeluting compounds; and
tn
^reference spectrum but not in the sample
spectruliKshouldNae reviewed for possible subtraction from
nple^^pectrunKbjScause of background contamination or
coelutinx compounds. Data system library reduction programs
can sometimes Create these discrepancies.
.4.10.2.3 If in the!technical judgment of the mass spectral
interpretation specialist, no valid tentative identification can
ae madesthe conmounci should be reported as unknown. The mass
spetet^al Specialist/should give additional classification of the
unknowh^ompotioti i/ possible (i.e., unknown aromatic, unknown
July, 1991
Page D - 49/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
hydrocarbon, unknown chlorinated compound). /If/probable molecular
weights can be distinguished, include them,
2.4.11 Quantitative Analysis
The quantitative analysis is performed by a
computerized procedures: the computer identifies'
characteristic ions in a full scan mode. At thLspoint the operatoi
intervenes to determine if the compound of interest has been located
correctly. If the compound identification is/correct, the computer then
performs the quantitative calculation using Wie-method o/f^-relative response
factors. Data are reported as ng/cartridge/ ana can be/subsequently converted
to /;g/m3 , as outlined in part 2.3.8.1.
the data
et compounds.
llowing
2.4.11.1 Target Compound Quantitati
2.4.11.1.1 Sample quantitation is pel
processing system for all desired ions ol
Target compounds are quantified according
equation: Eq. P/VOA~]
where:
jour
>f a:
standai
concentration,
ialyte,
standard applied to tube, fig,
vol\.
jcesponse. f a$
sampl
tor (RRF), and
. (m3), STP.
the compv/ter/must^ke ab/e to print out peak number,
relative retention time, area and amount.
2 .4.11.1.3 "^Stano^ard/responses and retention times in all
standards must^be evaluated during or immediately after data
If the reteration time for any standard changes by
than 30 ^s£onds rs^m trte latest daily (12 hour) calibration,
system-vjnust be inspected for malfunctions, and
vrequired. The SICP of the internal standards
evaluated for each sample and blank. If the
srnal standard changes by more than 40
itrometric system must be inspected for
itions made as appropriate. When corrections
5is/of duplicate samples analyzed while the
ictjconing is necessary.
July, 1991
Page D - 50/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.11.2 Non-Target Compound Quantltation
2.4.11.2.1 An estimated concentration fo,
tentatively identified shall be quantif
The nearest internal standard free of
1-target components
the standard method.
ferences shall be used.
2.4.11.2.2 The formula for calculatj
as in part 2.3.8.1.1. Total area c
the total ion chromatograms are to
to be measured and the standard
of one (1) is to be assumed.
shall be qualified as estimate
estimated concentration shoul
identified compounds as well/as ythose
(
becalcul
is the same
Lts) from
ipound
(RRF)
,_on
flagged "J"). This
for all tentatively
-nt/fied as unknowns.
ce
2.4.11.2.3 An estimated c^
all tentatively identified
as unknowns. This estimated Cw^
all tentatively identified compoun
as unknowns.
entrat
as
3uld be calculated for
f *ell as those identified
Lon must be calculated for
\1 as those identified
2.4.12 Performance Evaluation
2.4.12.1 Summary
2.4.12.1.1 The perfoi
Agency in monitoring ContXact
not be informed as to whicKcoz
samples or the—concentration^
:ion samples will assist the
performance. The laboratory will
founds are contained in the PE
icy.
2.4.12.I./ Thg-labor\tory will
adsorben? tube from\ t
ins true,
PE sa
PE s
2.4.12.
acceptance
cor_
PE si
^•J T—^, JJ/+..
PE samples on Tenax®
samples will come with
ition procedure required for the
and surrogate compounds to the
procedureS^in part 2.3.6.
lal
tion to complying with the PE sample technical
xtfie laboratory will be responsible for
identMyingN-b.e^quantifying the compounds included in
will notify the laboratory of
rforman
.2 Frequency
The Laboratory
Le once per sample
desorb, analyze, and report the results of the
delivery group, if available.
July, 1991
Page D - 51/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.4.12.3 Procedure
Desorb and concentrate the PE sample using tHe procedure described
in part-2.3.5. See part 2.3.8.1 for equation/necessary for
calculations. '
2.4.12.4 Technical Acceptance Criteria
2.4.12.4.1 The PE sample must be
meeting the BFB performance chec
continuing calibration technica
required frequency.
tyzed on a GC/MS
calibration,
ieptance/^riteria at
The PE sample mu
and
the
tec
ccording to part
analyzed with a
eptance criteria.
2.4.12.4.2
2.3.5.
2.4.12.4.3 The PE sample must be"
method blank that meets the blank
2.4.12.4.4 The percerrtr^Eecovery for each of^e/surrogates must
be within the acceptance windows~~tt»«e4__in part 2.3.8.3.
2.4.12.4.5 The area response changeytprtween^the PE sample and the
most recent calibration\taridard /analysis for each of the
surrogate standards must Be within/^O percent.
2.4.12.4.6 The^etention timeshlft between the PE sample and the
most recent continuing calibrafr^on\tandard analysis for each of
the internal standardsXmust be wi>thi\30 seconds.
, I .,—^ \ >
2.4.12.5 Corre/tiye Actior
2.4.12.^.I/ If theyPE Sample ~b6ch/ical acceptance criteria for the
internal sta**dard/and/surrogates are not met, check calculations,
standar^soluttsns and instrument performance. It may be
necessary tbxrecalio^rate the instrument or take other corrective
action procedure^to daet the technical acceptance criteria
\^
PE sam>le technical acceptance criteria MUST be
ile\data arV reported. Also, the Contractor must
le performance for compound identification and
If \the Contractor fails to meet the PE sample
criteria, the Agency may take, but is not
ring actions: reduction of the number of
sample shipment, a site visit, a full data
e the laboratory to analyze a remedial PE
a contract sanction, such as a Cure Notice.
July, 1991
Page D - 52/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
2.5 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMONSTRATING METHOD
ANALYSIS O.F AMBIENT AIR
2.5.1 Summary
2.5.1.1 Although this method describes the
compounds collected on Tenax®, collection
acceptable if the performance criteria de
met. Specifically, the analyst must dem<
alternate solid adsorbent and subsequen
part 2.3 produce results meeting these/ge
lEPTABILITY FOR THE
;sis of target
,ts is
.pn are
an
!/MS analysis as de^scrib^d in
sral criteria:
Minimum contract require^
in Table D/VOAT- 1;
Replicate precision
ntitat*nNlimits (CRQL) listed
pe;
it RSD;
Audit accuracy of 30 percent* for^pollutant concentrations
normally expected in ambient
2.5.1.2 These criteria were__es_tablished using
application of TO-10 methodology
Monitoring System (TAMs)
(UATMP). The primary reaso\to\base
method on performance is to a
analysis of VOCs in water to oe\us
than compressed gas standards ma^
audit standards must be humidifie
resemble the air majet±xT\De tails
criteria follow.
:al data from the
from the^foxics Air
•nitoring Program
_tabi^tty of analysis
being used for the
'DCs in air. Solutions rather
bevus/d for calibration. However,
.ndards, to most closely
determination of each of the
^syst
/ /
2.5.2 Minimum Contract Requirec
its (CRQL)
The minimum
measurements of a/con
detection limit, t
concentrations, and t
99 percent confidence for
.QI/is defined
tratic
star
value
valuj
4-abcjratory by making seven replicate
the compound of interest near the expected
lation computed for the seven replicate
iltiplied by 2.3.14 (the Student's t value for
2.5.3 Replic
PrecisJ
The/measure of preHsiok used for this program is the unsigned relative
difference between replicaos measurements of the same sample. There are
several/factors which may affecO the quoted precision of the measurement. The
nature/of fcive compound of interest itself may have some effect on the
precisitonsuc:h\as the obserWtidn that styrene generally shows slightly poorer
precision than thfexbulk of rlonp4lar VOCs. The primary influence on precision
is the coneentr^tion^ieveI/of/the compound of interest in the sample, i.e.,
the percent relativestahdard: deviation for a set of replicate values degrades
July, 1991
Page D - 53/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
as the concentration approaches the detection limit:.
of precision was -obtained from replicate analysis of Tei
TAMs network. This is the source for the 30 percent/til
overall replicate precision given above.
conservative measure
samples from the
re of merit for
2.5.4 Audit Accuracy
Audit Bias is defined as the relative
result and the nominal concentration of the
[(True - Found) x 100]/True. Audit standard
participating laboratories, these audit __
judged against criteria based on historica
i
* Exceptions are carbon tetrachlori<
higher audit accuracies are report
diJ
star
Snce between the\measur-eoent
'spiked compound, i.
Ll be supplied to the
and the results
tri/fchloroethane, for which
TAMs study.
July, 1991
Page D - 54/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-1. Target Compound List for Volatiles Col]
and Contract Required Quantitation Limit
Compound
Pencachloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Chloroform
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2 -Dichloroethane
Chlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes, m- and p-
Xylene, o-
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromoe thane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dioxane
Tribromomethane
1, 3 -Dichlorobenzene
3 -Chloro-1-propene
Tetrahydrofuran
Bromoethane
Bromochloromethan
1,2,3-Trichlorop
2 -Chloropropane
Bromobenzene
l,4-Dichloro-2-b
l-Bromo-3-ch
(1-Methyle
1-Methyl
1-Etheny
Bromotrich
on Tenaz* Tubes
CRQL. (ng1)
July, 1991
Page D - 55/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Col]
on Tenax& Tubes
104-51-8
108-41-8
100-52-7
100-47-0
Table D/VT-1. Target Compound List for Volatiles
and Contract Required Quantitation Lim
(Continued)
Compound
Pentachloroethane
1-Chloropropane
1,2-Dibromopropane
2,3-Dichlorobucane
2-Chlorobutane
1, 3-Dichlorobutane
1,4-Dichlorobutane
3,4-Dichloro-l-butene
l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane
2-Chloroethoxyethene
1-Phenylethanone
D ib romomethane
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
o-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
p-Chlorotoluene
n-Butylbenzene
m-Chlorotoluene
Benzaldehyde
Benzonitrile
July, 1991
Page D - 56/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No-. XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-2. Typical Operating Conditions for * GC/VS
Thermal Desorption Unit: • NuTech Model 320, Tekraan
5000 or equivalent
Purge Gas (Prior to Desorption)
Desorption Cycle
Initial Desorption Temperature
Final Desorption Temperature
Thermal Desorption Unit Purge
Gas Chromato^raphv
Injection/Detector Temperature
Initial Column Temperature
Initial Hold Time
Program
Final Hold Temperature
Final Hold Time
Maximum Over Temperature
Carrier Gas
GC/MS Interface
Sample Injection to MS
Column
Helium @ L.2,
8 minutes
25'C
150°C
10 mL/mi
Mass Spectrometer -
Mass Range
Scan Time
El Condition
Mass Scan and Detecto
Routine Tuni
Preamp Sens
Emission C
Electron
Mass Fil
Filter
Total
Resolution
Display
Response
4c at 250"C
.lass jet
glass capillary
methyl silicone (50 m x 0.3
film thickness) Scientific
.neering SE-30 glass capillary
>d methyl silicone (50 m x 0.5
jum\film thickness)
)
tron Impact (El)
nin over entire range
70 eV
Follow manufacturer instruction for select
mass selective detector (MS) and scan mode
•omofluorobenzene
-0.45
1000 to 1500
10 amu/sec
x 100
1
Normal
TIC
Fast
'ul-i
1991
Page D - 57/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-3. Required BFB Key Ions and Ion
.nee Criteria
Mass
50
75
95
96
173
174
175
176
177
Ion Abundance Crlter/a
8.0
30.0
40.0 percent of maps
• 66.0 percent of
base peak, 100 percer
5.0 - 9.0 percent of
less than 2.0 percent o£ mass
50.0-120.0 percent
4.0 - 9.0 percent
93.0 - 101.0 pero4nt/of mass/174
5.0 - 9.0 percent
tha nominal basa peak. avan though tha ion abundance
July, 1991
Page D - 58/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No> XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-4.
Composition and Approximate Com
Calibration Standards Concentre
in t rat ion of
(ng)
Compound
benzene*
coluene
1,2-dimethylbenzene*
1,3,5-crimethyIbenzene
ethylbenzene*
styrene
(1-methylechyl) benzene
butylbenzene
l-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl) benzene
chlorobenzene*
broraobenzene
1,2-dichlorobenzene*
1-ethenyl-4-chlorobenzene
chloroform
te trachlorome thane*
bromochloromethane*
bromotrichloromethane*
dibromome thane*
tribromomethane*
1,1-dichloroethane*
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1,1-trichloroethane*
1,1,2-trichloroethane*
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroetha;
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroet
pentachloroethane*
1,1-dichloroethene*
trichloroethene*
tetrachloroethene
bromoethane*
1,2-dibromoethane*
1-chloropropane*
2 -ch.oropropane*
1,2-dichloro
1,3-dichlor^pro
1,2,3-tri
1-bromo-y-
3-chlor
Cal 5
July, 1991
Page D - 59/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-4
Composition and Approximate Concen^
Standards Concentration (ng)
(continued)
Compound
1,2-dibromopropane*
2-chlorobutane
1,3-dichlorobucane
1,4-dichlorobucane
2,- 3 -dichlorobutane*
l,4-dichloro-2-butane (cis)
3,4-dichloro-1-butane
ce trahydro furan
1,4-dioxane
l-chloro-2,3-epoxypropane
2-chloroethoxyethene
benzaldehyde*
acetophenone
benzonitrile
Cal 1
of Calibration
Cal 5
•Compounds used Co
tubes.
a de,ily basis either by direct injection or on spiked Tenax* adsorbent
July, 1991
Page D - 60/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-5. Target Compound List for Volatiles
' • Cartridges with Characteristic
Secondary)
ted on TenaxA
imary and
Compound
Trichloroechylene
Chloroform
Benzene*
Carbon Tetrachloride
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethene*
1,2-Dichloroethane*
Chlorobenzene*
1,1,1-Trichloroethane*
1,1,2-Trichloroethane*
1,1,2,2-Te trachloroe chane
Ethylbenzene*
Scyrene
1,1-Dichloroethane*
Toluene
Xylenes, o-, m-, and p-
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene*
1,2-Dibromoethane*
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dioxane
Tribromomethane*
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
3-Chloro-l-propene
Te trahydro furan
Bromoethane
Bromochloromethane*/
1,2,3-Trichloroprctfane'
2-Chloropropane
Bromobenzene
l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
1 - Bromo- 3-chloi
(1-Methyleth;
l-Methyl-4-l.
1-Ethenyl-
Primary Ion**
ene
*Compounds
or on spiked a
**Ion used for
GG/MS on a daily basis either by direct injection
tCequ^red Quantitation Limits (CRQL) Determination.
July, 1991
Page D - 61/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-5.
Target Compound List for Volatiles
Cartridges, with Characteristic I*
Secondary)
(continued)
cted on Tenax®
'(Primary and
Compound
Primary Ion*y
Bromotrichloromethane*
Pentachloroethane*
1-Chloropropane*
1,2 -Dibromopropane*
2,3-Dichlorobutane
2 -Chlorobutane
1,3 -Dichlorobutane
1,4-Dichlorobutane
3,4-Dichloro-l-butene
l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane
2-Chloroethoxyethene
1-Phenylethanone
D ib romome thane*
1,3-Dichloroporpane
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
o-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
p-Chlorotoluene
n-Butylbenzene
m-Chlorotoluene
July, 1991
Page D - 62/VT
-------
Exhibit 0
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Table D/VT-6. Typical Compounds Used in
- . Factor (RF) Determination vith Spec
Mass Loading onto Spiked Cartridge
Compound
Benzene
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Chlorobenzene
Tetrachloroechylene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, o-, m-, and p-
Styrene
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
July, 1991
Page D - 63/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No, XXX - Ambient Air
Figure D/VT- 1. Common Designs of Adsor
(c) Multibed Adsorbent Tube
July, 1991
Page D - 64/VT
-------
Exhibit 0
SOW No. XXX - Aabient Air
Figure D/VT- 2. Typical Desorption GC/MS Configuration
July, 1991
Page D - 65/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Figure D/VT- 3. Flash Evaporation
5/8 IN. UNION
16.5m)
July, 1991
Page D - 66/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOV No. XXX - Anbient Air
Figure D/7T- 4. Permeation Tube System for
• • Standard Gas Atmospheres
at ing
Math tson
8-S3D
Regulator
Nttdlt Vai'
Ptrtntitton Chjmfc
Jacket
Th«fmo«at, Heawr, and
Circulating Pump
Carrier Gai Linei
Thtrmoitat Fluid L;nes
July, 1991
Page D - 67/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Figure D/VT- 5. Ten«j* Clean-Up
Placed In lab«i«d
tub*
• Store In ei**n room
In DIM g*jim cam
• fWfrigoruo
untn IMO
• Cental** logbook and
Chaln-ot-Cuatody Form
Oaalccata
Vacuum OVMI
9 100° C
ovarnlght with
Nltrogw Flow
• Holhinfilow
o 0«*ore\for ¥T|
July, 1991
Page D - 68/VT
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TENAX CLEANUP WORKSHEET
Tenax Batch No.
Virgin/Recycled. Recycled Source
Extraction
Number of Soxhlet Units (circle one)
Methanol Extraction: Date (Hours)
Pentane Extraction:
Nitrogen Chamber:
Vacuum Oven:
iphon Rate
Date (Hours)
Siphon Rate
S ieving/Packing
Sieve (40/60) Date:
Packing Date(s):
Cleanup
Teflon Septum; Date:
Teflon Liner
(Hours)
Approx. Flowrate
ate (Hours)
Pump Trap
Cooldown (Hours)
N2 Vent Thru Act. C
July, 1991
Page D - 69/VT
-------
ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR
SEMIVOLATILES COLLECTED BY P
GAS CHROMATi
INATION OF
^2 AND ANALYZED BY
.OMETRY (GC/MS)
-------
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
SECTION 3
ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION/OF
SEMIVOLATILES COLLECTED BY PUF/XAD-2 AND ANyaYZ^D BY
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY AND MASS SPECTROMETRY/(G0/MS)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SAMPLE STORAGE AND HOLDING TIMES
CARTRIDGE PREPARATION AND CERTIF]
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR GC/MS
GC/MS ANALYSIS
GC/FID/ECD OPTIONAL SCREENING METHODOI
PESTICIDES, AND PCBs/AROCLORS
3.7 BIBLIOGRAPHY
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 3
ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION 01
SEMIVOLATILES COLLECTED BY PUF/XAD-2 AND ANALYZED BY
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY AND MASS SPECTROMETR* ((*C/MS)
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.1.1 Scope and Application
3.1.1.1 Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons' ( PAHs), pesticides,
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)/Aroclors /an/ other ^emivolatile compounds
(SVGAs) have received increased attention^ in/recent /ea*s in air pollution
studies because some of these compounds/are/highly /ar/inogenic or
mutagenic. In particular, benzo[a]pyr^ne CB-U] P) /b,lC' -ODD, 4,4'-DDT, and
PCBs have all been identified as being
3.1.1.2 The analytical method that follows ^sxdesighed to analyze samples
containing the compounds listed on the Target Compound Li^t in Exhibit C.
The samples analyzed under this method are expected tcNc_ont^in
concentrations in the following.
PAHs
PCBs
Pesticides
SVGAs
3.1.1.3 The analys
Methods 610 and 625,/Me
Industrial Wastewa
Evaluation of Sol
Statement of Wor
EPA Method 680,
Soil/Sediment by Gas
3.1.1.4 Sur
sample prep
extract b
concentr
charact
compou
each
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
NOTE: Alpha-chlordane and heptachlor, other major components of technical
chlordane, may. also be present and will be detected ayld measured with this
method.
3.1.1.5 An interfaced data system (DS) to contr
store, retrieve, and manipulate mass spectral da
full-range monitoring data are acquired, all me
identified and measured with one GC/MS analysi
3.1.1.6 Applicability of the Method to PCas/Ai4clors
ition and to
When
3.1.1.6.1 This method is applicable fib samples
single congeners or as complex mixture's, /such as
PCBs are identified and measured as i:som4r grout
chlorination) by GC/MS using specia]>vs_oftw>se.
Snt^ining PCBs as
:oimnercial Aroclors.
.. e., by leve1 of
3.1.1.6.2 Total PCB-concentration in eachxsamptexextract is obtained
by summing isomer group concentrations. The e^stenc^of 209 possible
PCB congeners makes the listing of the Chemical Abs^racfesN Service
Registry Number (CASRN) for ea^r~p«4^ntial method analjct/ impractical.
3.1.1.6.3 Because PCBs are \dei
the non-specific CASRN for eachX
describe method analytes.
measuredTas isomer groups,
of c^lofTTKbtior/ is used to
3.1.1.6.4 During optional screening utilizing GC/ECD analysis, the
individual Aroclors canjis^qualitative^y and quantitatively determined.
i.fied, and meas
ncbrtrration
3.1.1.6.5 PCBs
level of chlorinat/lon;
group, and total
by summing isom
used as calibratio^i standards ,and one
is used to cal4brate\MS re4pc
require the use oi^ the
'concentration
toup concent
icor
s isomer groups (i.e., by
asured for each PCB isomer
sample extract is obtained
rne selected PCB congeners are
'rnal standard, chrysene-d12,
se to PCBs, unless sample conditions
internal standard, phenanthrene-d10.
3.1.1.7
Detection Limits
mits va^yainong method analytes and with sample
procedures, condition of the GC/MS system,
id individual samples. The procedures for
thod detection limit (MDL) for each atxalyte
ion is presented in Section 5, GC/MS
3.1.1.7.:
one instrumet
comments are pro>
analyses of calibration solutions using
of approximately six months, .the following
to/assist the analyst:
July, 1991
Page D - 2/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.1.1.7.2.1 Pesticide analytes other than endosuifans I and II can
be identified and accurately measured when the injected aliquot
contains 2 ng of each analyte. The endosuifans/retire about 4 ne
each. / / &
3.1.1.7.2.2 Detection limits for individual PCB conveners increase
with increasing number of chlorine atoms, /itt/the detection limit
for decachloribiphenyl being about 5-10 t/me/higheK±hantkat of a
monochlorobiphenyl. A monochlorobiphenyk^can be identified ai
accurately measured when the injected e£hfact aliquot contHns 1
and full SCAN data are acquired.
3.1.1.7.2.3 The detection limit fo
number of individual PCB congeners/pr
from 1 ng to 10 pg.
to/tal PCB<
sent.
>ill depend on the
PAHs, the MDL is
3.1.1.8
Safety
3.1.1.8.1 The toxicity or carcinogenicity^pf ea~bfa reagent used in
this method has not been precisely defined; however/^ach chemical
compound should be treated as apotential health Ra^ard^ From this
viewpoint, exposure to theseVchernlcaii^must be reduceWo the lowest
possible level by whatever
responsible for maintaining a\cur^ent~
Safety and Health Administrati
of the chemicals specified in th\s mXth?
data handling sheets (MSDs) shoul
personnel involved in the chemical
laboratory safety are^avaiiable and h\ve
analyst.
8ust be reducec
oratory is
if Occupational
ig the safe handling
A reference file of material
made available to all
is. Additional references to
«en identified for the
31.1.8.2 CareAus^ be ex^rcfcSed^when wooing with these substances
This method does/not^ purport/ to address^all of the safety problems
associated with/it/ use. 1/6 i/theN^spo/sibility of whoever uses this
method to consult4ica;bil/ty of regulatory limitations prior to use
The user should Bfexthorbughiy familiar with the chemical and physical
properties of targete^substances.
3 .1.1.8 JJx^TreataSl^nalytes as^carcinogens. Neat compounds should
be weirifed i*-!r^ve &*x. Spe^/samples and unused standards are toxic
waste ^id/should be^spo^ed according to regulations. Regularly check
countert^ops and equipifcentWh "black light" for fluorescence as an
indycat/r of semivolatil^ contamination.
3.1.2 Si
.Method
P>iRr tSseld
are cleaned in
is then spiked with^three
ise
the filter and adsorbent cartridge (PUF/XAD-
and vacuum dried. The adsorbent cartridge
rrogate compounds. The filter and spiked
Page D - 3/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
adsorbent cartridge are stored in screw-capped jars wrapped in aluminum
foil prior to installation on the sampler.
3.1.2.2 Approximately 273 m3 of ambient air is
and adsorbent cartridge at a rate of approximately,
analytes of interest are retained. At the end o
period, the amount of air sampled is recorded,
are placed in an appropriately labeled contain
blank filter and adsorbent cartridges to the a'na
analysis.
the filter
the
tridge
3.1.2.3 The filters and PUF/XAD-2 adsor^entt' cartridge^are extracted
together by Soxhlet extraction with diethyl /ther/hejtaner solvent (9:1 v/v) .
The extract is concentrated using a Kuderna/Danish /K-PO evaporator,
followed by silica gel cleanup (optionaflj using calum/ chromatography to
remove potential interferences. The eluenx.is fhrther concentrated by K-D
evaporation, followed by nitrogen blowdown to^^l mL. \Prior to analysis by
GC/MS, internal standards are added to the concentrated
3.1.2.4 If applicable, the coi
of PAHs, pesticides, PCBs/Aroclors,
flame ionization detector (FID) ar
final identification and quantifie
capillary column, temperature-progr^
are then detected with a mass spectro1!
acquisition mode.
extract is screened for levels
and o~tKer--S3ZQCsutilizing a GC with a
;ron capture~-de-£ector (ECD) . For
ixt^ract^is/njected onto a GC
irate the compounds, which
tete
in the full SCAN data
NOTE: The method is baagqupon'xfull scanxiatax acquisition.
3.1.2.5 Target comp'ou;
standards under the /ami
comparing resultant/ma,
is established fo
calibrations by
the compound to
standard. Each identi
comparing .the responses
while taking into ac"
calibration^ the_in_itial
3.1.2.6
mass
Nation,
Libra
for the
nearest int"
3.1.3 Interferences
compou
mpound
ndard./ A
.idejxtJLfied iri\th/^ samples by analyzing
analytical cond^tlpnsNased as the samples and
s spectra and~SCretention times. A response factor
targey compound eurjjig the initial and continuing
response for the primary ion produced by
for the primary ion produced by an internal
et compound in a sample is quantified by
get compound and the internal standard,
t theN^sports^ factor from the most recent
id fin^k,sample volume, and any sample dilutions.
are identified by comparing the resultant
: compounds to mass spectra contained in the
and Technology (NIST) Mass Spectral
re quantified by comparing the MS response
s to the MS response produced by the
esponse factor of 1 is assumed.
ions
3.1.3.1 Contaminants in solvents, reagents, glassware and other sample
July, 1991
Page D - 4/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
processing hardware may cause method interferences such/as^discrete
artifacts and/or.elevated baselines in the total ion current profiles
(TICPs). All of these materials must be routinely demonstrated to be free
from interferences under the conditions of the analysis Joy running
laboratory method blanks. Hatrix interferences may/be caused by
contaminants that are coextracted from the sample./ The extent of matrix
interferences will vary considerably from source /to zoui
3.1.3.2 Interferences may be caused by conta&in^nts in solvents,
reagents, glassware, and other sample processing^equipment. Labor*
method blanks are analyzed each analysis to (demonstrate that these
materials are free of interferences under the analytical conditions used
for samples. ""
3.1.3.3 To minimize interferences, gl4ssv»are should/be meticulously
cleaned. As soon as possible after use^ rinseglassware with the last
solvent used. Then wash with detergent I^hotSiater/and rinse with tap
water followed by distilled water. Drain dryland h&at in a muffle furnace
at 450°C for a few hours (volumetric glassware&femildS^t be heated in a
muffle furnace). After cooling, store glassware irrvertedx«r covered with
aluminum foil. Before using, rin&e^each piece with an^appropriate solvent.
NOTE: Some thermally stable materis
by this treatment. Solvent rinsed wi
hexane may be substituted for the
such
acetZ
fur
as FCBs~Ti»y-_not be eliminated
pesticide-quality
3.1.3.4 For both pesticides and PCBV interference can be caused by the
presence of much greater quantities of b£herNadditionar\sam^le extract preparation
procedures must then be/used to Eliminate interferences. Capillary column
GC retention times anci the^c^m>^urtd^specif icXchairacteristics of mass
spectra eliminate majply itoterfer&ncestfiaeure detection. The approach
and identification/criteria usied itt thi^methtod for PCBs eliminate
interference by nj6st ^h^rina^ed/compoundsother than other PCBs . With the
isomer group approa<^ co^yting PCBs that contain the same number of
chlorines are identified and measured together. Therefore, coeluting PCBs
are a problem only if they^cont^ina different number of chlorine atoms.
This interferejie«— piKxb^lem isNabviabsd by rigorous application of the
identification criteria""describe^L in phis method
,— \ x \y
3.1.4 Definitions
Definitions used in this \doovument and in any user-prepared standard
operaing >rocedures (SOPs) jshoiild be consistent with ASTM Methods D1356,
E255. All /abbreviations and symbols are defined within
this document a t^sije point/of yuse . A detailed glossary of terms can be
found in Exhife-i^: G .
CAL: \Calib4at ion standards are defined in Table D/SV-1 in
Julv.
Page D - D/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
which 5 levels of calibration are defined: CAL 1,
and CAL 5. • CAL 1 is the lowest concentration and
concentration. CAL 3- is designated as the solut
continuing calibrations.
3.1.4.2 Continuing calibration check (CCC,
method analytes used to evaluate the mass sp
period of time. A continuing calibration c;
12-hour period. The CCC solution is the
calibration curve.
3.1.4.3
CAL 3, CAL 4,
is the highest
be used for
olution of
onsexpver a
GC response (A^: The peai
3.1.4.5 Laboratory method blank (LMB): An
solution that is treated as a^sample. It
and apparatus, and all raetho
and surrogate compounds are
final volume used for samples
extract. The purpose of the
contamination.
3.1.4.4 Internal standard (IS) : /A rfure comp'ounft added to a sample
extract in known amounts and used t«{calikrate /concentration
measurements of other compounds that arse sample components. The
internal standard must be a compound thatNj^s notAa^ sample component.
3.1.4.6 Mass spectral interference: Defined as the inability to
detect the internal arSn^Srti. quantification ion due to presence of high
levels of mass spec/ral "pois
3.1.4.7 Meth/d
value indicating: t
identified and/me
that the analyte
limit CMftL): N( statistically determined
minimum' conetM^tratibrrrof an analyte that can be
/a sample fflai^i^ with 99 percent confidence
iti(yn is greater than zero. This value varies
extraction
o it'll glassware
internal standards,
entrated to the
as a sample
possible laboratory
with the precis
calculation.
3.1.4.8
3.1.4.
3.1.4.11
July,L991
licate measurements used for the
atic hydrocarbon.
biphenyl.
Luation (PE) sample: A sample containing
analytes that has been analyzed by
jrmine statistically the accuracy and
pecked when a method is performed by a competent
zation and concentrations are unknown to the
Supplied by the Agency.
rethane foam is used as an adsorbent and support
Page D - 6/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
for XAD-3.
3.1.4.12 Retention time window: Retention tim<
each analyte of interest as the time from injecti
specific chemical from a chromatographic column
determined by three injections of a single compon
hour period as plus or minus three times the
absolute retention time for that analyte.
determined for
fen to elution of a
THe^window is
standard over a 24
ieviatdon of the
3.1.4.13 Selected Ion Current Profile /SlbP) : A plot of ior
abundances of the ions of an analyte projiuce4 by the mass spectrometer.
3.1.4.14 Stock Standard Solution:
calibration standards. Normally,
concentration which is easily dilute
into the GC.
splution rised to prepare
solution will/be at a
t0 a leve/ which can be injected
3.1.4.15 Surrogate compound: A compound not^expected to be found in
the sample that is added to each sample prior\to fi^Ul deployment and
before extraction, and is measured with the same\mroceb;ures used to
measure sample components. Tke^Eurpose of a surroga
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.2 SAMPLE STORAGE AND HOLDING TIMES
»
3.2.1 Sample Identification
3.2.1.1 In the field, the samples are packed in
glass sample container containing the filter and
chilled, and shipped to the designated laborato
insure the
e are
3.2.1.2 The samples are logged in the Iaboc4to^y logbook or approp^ia;
data tracking system according to sample location, filter and adsorbent^
cartridge number identification, and total ^ir/volume sampled, corrected to
standard temperature and pressure (STP). The/time the/samples are logged-
in on the Chain of Custody Log-In Sheet a/t t#e laboraxor/y is the Validated
Time of Sample Receipt (VTSR).
3.2.1.3 If the time between sample recent ancKanalysis is greater than
24 hours, then the samples must be kept refrigiaratedrxjMinimize exposure of
samples to fluorescent light. All samples must De-vextra-Q^ed within five
(5) days of VTSR.
3.2.2 Sample Storage
3.2.2.1 The samples must be con
protected from light, and refrigera
receipt until 60 days after delivery
Agency. After 60 days, the samples
complies with all applicable ^regulations^
3.2.2.2 Samples musp^be
of all potential contam
3.2.2.3 Samples,
separately.
3.2.3 Sample Extract
3.2.3.1 .Sample extracts
(±2°C) until
Agency.
3.2.3.2
be free
ss containers,
2°C) from the time of
etc data package to the
of in a manner that
e demonstrated to be free
rds must be stored
3.2.4.2 Extract:
the extraction.
rotected from light and stored at 4°C
a complete data package to the
be stored in an atmosphere demonstrated to
nants.
es
be started within 5 days of the VTSR.
./zed within 25 days following the start of
July, iyyi
Page D ^
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.3 CARTRIDGE PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION
3.3.1 Summary of Method
This part of the SOW discusses pertinent inform^
preparation and cleaning of the filter, adsorbent^
cartridge assembly. The separate batches of fil;
extracted with the appropriate solvent. At leajS
cartridge assembly and one glass filter from
the batch, whichever is greater, must be test
batch is considered for field use. The glas c/rtridge is then assera%yed,
extracted, and certified. Prior to sampl^ng/the cartridges are spiked
with surrogate compounds.
3.3.2 Apparatus and Materials
incf
3.3.2.1 Acid-washed Pallflex filter:
Metal Works, Inc., Cat. No. GMW QMA-4, 145"xSxNo. 1-62, Supelco
3.3.2.2 Polyurethane foam (P
and 6.5-cm by 4.5-cm. These c
stock, polyether type (density
General Metal Works, Inc., Cat.
of Cleves, OH, 45002, 800-543-7412,
Park, Bellefonte, PA, 16823-0048, or
are also commercially available from
3.3.2.3 XAD-2 resin
Bellefonte, PA, 16823/00.
3.3.2.4 Aluminu
rinsing with hexai
SupelcoXlnc
eq
baked
rates plugs/^e.5-cm by 2.5-cm
3 inch thick sheet
iture upholstering,
iami Ave., Village
Inc., Cat. No. 1-63, Supelco
The two separate plugs
Metal Works.
No\ 2-02-79, Supelco Park,
/ernight at 500"C after
3.3.2.5 Sampling heacKcov(fi
filter holder compartsient roL
PUF and XAD-2 adsorbentsV^as
.ration: The sampling head consists of a
fowed by a glass cartridge for retaining the
.strated in Figure D/SV-1.
3.3.2.6 S'oxhlet extractors:
and adsorb4nt/cTa~Ftr~t
inivials: 2-
lined with Teflo
te of extracting GMW Model PS-1 filter
tength), 500 mL flask, and condenser.
3.3.2.
3.3.2.9
rosilicate glass, with conical reservoir and
-raced silicone disks, and a vial holder.
50-mL.
July,L991
Page D - 9/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3,3.2.10 Spatulas ans spoons: Teflon®-coated stainless/steel.
3.3.2.11 Kuderna-Danish (KD) apparatus: 500-mL evaporation flask (Kontes
K-570001-500," or equivalent), 10 mL graduated concetttrato^vtubes (Kontes K-
570050-1025, or equivalent) with ground-glass stoDper^V^and J^ball macro
Snyder Column (Kontes K-5700010500, K-50300-0121 and K-SBSOOl-'HS, or
equivalent).
3.3.2.12 Absorption columns for column chro^at^graphy: 1 cm x
s tands.
3.3.2.13 White cotton gloves: For hand
3.3.2.14 Glove box: For working with/ext<
reagents with explosion-proof hood for
reagents, etc.
3.3.2.15 Vacuum oven: Vacuum drying oven syste
vacuum at 240 torr (flushed with nitrogen) overnight^
3 . 3 .2 .16 Concentrator tubes
variable flow rate.
3.3.2.17 Laboratory refrigerator.
'and filters.
standards and
solvents,
3.3.2.18 Boiling chips: Solvent extr\cted/10/40 mesh silicon carbide, or
equivalent.
3.3.2.19 Water bath:
temperature control.
3.3.2.20 Vortex
of maintaining a
;
tion apparatus: with
ing cover, capable of ±5°C
3.3.3
with
shallow tra
3.3.3.6
.hie grade, glass distilled.
hie grade, glass distilled.
atographic grade, glass distilled.
Chromatographic grade, glass-distilled.
drous (ACS), granular (purified by washing
d by heating at 400°C for 4 hours in a
urity grade.
July, 1991
Page D - LO/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.3.4 Procedures for Preparation of Filter, Adsorbent, and/Cartridge
3.3.4.1 Glass Fiber Filter Preparation
3.3.4.1.1 The quartz fiber filters are baked
before use. To ensure acceptable filters, the
methylene chloride in a Soxhlet apparatus,
the XAD-2 resin. The extract may be analyze
determining cleanliness prior to certificat
for five hours
with
of
3.3.4.1.2 The extracted filters are set: as
prior to combined extraction with the PUF/X/D-2/PUF glass cartridge
assembly. "
3.3.4.2 XAD-2 Adsorbent Preparation
3.3.4.2.1 For initial cleanup of theOCAD-^^wresfn, a batch of XAD-2
(approximately 50-60 grams) is placed iri^a^Soxhl^ apparatus and
extracted with methylene chloride for 16 houts at approximately 4 cycles
per hour.
3.3.4.2.2 At the end of the initial
methylene chloride is discarded'
XAD-2 resin is once again ext
cycles per hour.
3.3.4.2.3 The XAD-2 resin is remWec
placed in a vacuum oven connected to\
and dried at room tempefatttr^ for appi
solvent odor is detected).
extracti
at
the spent
h reagent. The
proximately 4
>m the Soxhlet apparatus,
-pure nitrogen gas stream
tely 2-4 hours (until no
iltra
NOTE: Alternati
/ " J • I
with methylene chloride for /
transferred to /a. <^lean dry^tij
high-purity n/tro
with a charcoa
the XAD-2 resin is
sufficient space for fiuidiz"
maintained^*—49^0^ durir?
resin is Soxhlet-extracted
r extraction, the resin is
o lumn'N^TWn the resin is dried with
Ion® tubing from the nitrogen cylinder
ine. In an alternative method of drying,
TI a Pyrex® column (10 cm x 60 cm), allowing
The column is wrapped with heat tape,
the ""Shaving process. High purity air,
scrubbed/through a charcoal>^ap, >s forced through the resin bed,
fluidizang>cKe~BeTKwhilev genera^Wg a minimum load at the exit of the
colum-7 / ^ ^
3.3/4.2/.4 The extract Y^oin the Soxhlet extraction procedure from each
ba/ch bay be .analyzed ugjind GC/FID or GC/ECD (see part 3.6) or by GC/MS
(see^part^^S) , for the ^ur^ose of determining initial cleanliness prior
to cerbificatlsm.
July.
Page D - 11/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.3.4.3 PUF Adsorbent Preparation
3.3.4.3.1 The PUF adsorbent is a polyether-type/po
(density 0.0225 g/cm3).
3.3.4.3.2 The PUF adsorbent is composed of
illustrated in Figure D/SV-2. The bottom PUF,
the top plug is 6.5-cm by 5.0-cm. The PUF
stock and should fit with slight compressi
supported by the wire screen. The two PUP p
inch deep) are also commercially available
from General Metal Works.
.rethane foam
while
3.3.4.3.3 For initial cleanup, the
apparatus and extracted with ace tonefpr
cycles per hour. When cartridges are ri
v/v) can be used as the cleanup solvent.
gs (i.e., 1-inch and
pre-cu-t separate pieces
ire /laced in a Soxhlet
ts at approximately 4
iyl ether/hexane (1:19
NOTE: A modified PUF cleanup procedure can be usea^to remove unknown
interference components of the/TtfF-bJ^nk^ This methocKcoftsists of
compressed rinsing 50 times w/th toluene7~^rB*^or scainiess steel screen (mesh size 200/200) is
fitted to the bo ctx*mof>a/heptane-rinsed glass sampling cartridge to
retain the PUF/XAD-2>a4sorbe-qts, as illustrated in Figure D/SV-1. A
Soxhlet-extracted, vacuutoKdrie^xPUF (2.5-cm thick by 6.5-cm diameter) is
placed on iKJpof "^Rfrv^creenXn the^glass sampling cartridge using
polyestf^ "" ^ \ 7
' Y ^\ \
g of 35/60 mesh Soxhlet-extracted, vacuum
nto the sampling cartridge (using clean
if the PUF. A second Soxhlet-extracted,
.5-cm x 5.0-cra) is placed on top of the
,e top nickel or stainless steel screen is
idge.
\ \V /
3.3.4.4.3 The>4^ss module containing the PUF/XAD-2 adsorbent is
wrapped with hexane^n^ed aluminum foil, placed in a labeled container
and tightly sealed with Teflon® tape.
Jul
Page D - 12/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
NOTE: The aluminum foil should be baked in an oven
after rinsing with hexane to insure that no residu
3.3.5 Procedure-for Certification of PUF/XAD-2 Cartrid
3.3.5.1 The filters and PUF/XAD-2 adsorbent are
extraction and concentrated using a Kuderna-Danis
does not have to be cleaned by the optional sili
•night at 500eC
emain.
jsemblies
by Soxhlet
The extract
3.3.5.2 Assemble the Soxhlet apparatus. C
with 300 mL of the extraction solvent and re
apparatus cool, disassemble it, and discard
Transfer the filter and PUF/XAD-2 glass ca/tr
(the use of an extraction thimble is opti
NOTE: The filter and adsorbent assemb
reach detection limits and to minimize
3. 3. 5.. 3 Add 300 mL of diethyl ether/hexan*
apparatus. Reflux the sample for 18 hours at
per hour. Allow to cool, then disassemble the appal
3.3.5.4 Assemble a K-D concentrator
tube to a 500-mL evaporative flask:
techniques may be used in place tff t
for all the target analyte compounds £
used extraction solver
to the Soxhlet apparatus
ether in order to
to the Soxhlet
at least 3 cycles
ing a 10-mL concentrator
concentratrreH^devices or
ivalenfcy is demonstrated
kstedinExhibit C.
3.3.5.5 Transfer the extract by pouYing tKe extract through a drying
column containing about 10 cm of anhydrous granular sodium sulfate, and
collect the extract in th€nrTXconcentraCor7\Rinse the Erlenmeyer flask
and column with 20 to 2(0 mL_of 1& percent dietftylether/hexane to complete
the quantitative trarysfe)
3.3.5.6 Add one far. ifwo clea:
Snyder column to tme /evaporat;
adding about 1 m^ of Sstje extj
Place the K-D apparatus
tube is partially immetsed in
surface of the flask is Bached
position of the—apparatus an
chip^and attach a three-ball
:lask.^\gre/wet the Snyder column by
on solvent to the top of the column.
water bath (50°C) so that the concentrator
.the hot water, and the entire lower rounded
hot vapor. Adjust the vertical
,£he water temperature as required to complete
the concentration_in on>xhour. ^At th£ proper rate of distillation, the
balls of trfie Gt5lurniT>MA actively dhdtter but the chambers will not flood
with condensed solvent . N^herK the apparent volume of liquid reaches 5 mL,
remove Ae /K-D apparatus fXomVhe water bath and allow it to drain and cool
for a-t/lea'st 5 minutes. Reiovd the Snyder column and rinse the flask and
its l^wer^^int into the concentrator tube with 5 mL of cyclohexane. A 5-
mL syrime is^ecommended fbr this operation.
3.3.5.7
obtain a final volume
techniques. These pi
ypes of concentration techniques are permitted to
o 1 .10 mL: micro-Snyder column and nitrogen blowdown
edu/es are outlined in parts 3.4.4.2.4 and
uly,
Page D - 13/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.4.4.2.5, respectively.
3.3.5.8 Technical Acceptance Criteria
The level of target compounds must be less
each pair of filter and adsorbent assembly at
equal to 10
for
3.3.5.9
Documentat ion
Reporting requirements are listed in Exhibit B.
3.3.6 Deployment of Cartridges for Field
Ling
3.3.6.1 Prior to field deployment, a/min4mum of /thr;
compounds are added to the center bed
microsyringe. The surrogate compounds (iT^^. chemic
not expected to occur in an environmental samp^iej mx;
cartridge assembly.
e surrogate
artridge, using a
ly inert compounds
be added to each
3.3.6.2 The recovery of the sufrcrga-ce^standard is use^xt^ monitor for
unusual matrix effects and gross' sampling proc~s*sin£errors. Surrogate
recovery is evaluated for accept^ce\Ey~~'*le-tej3iiining whet^fer the measured
concentration falls within the acceptance limits
3.3.6.3 The following surrogate
determining matrix effects, breakthrouf
GC/MS. Refer to part 3 . 5-S^JJ^ f or prepai
mixture.
Surrogate Comp
13C6-Gamma-BHC
13C12-4,4'-DDT
13C6-4-monochloroh
13C,2-3,3' ,4,4'-tee
13ci2-2,2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,
13C12-Decachlorobiphenyl
Nitrobenzene-d
2-Fluorobip
p-Terpheny
2,4,6-Tripromophenol
2-Fluor
Phenol-,
ave been successfully used in
analytical problems, by
of surrogate spiking
SpikVd Amount (qg/cartridee)
50
5
100
250
400
500
100
100
100
100
100
100
3 . 3 . 6 ^\ At^a minimum, the/following three surrogate compounds must be
added to e^tQh adsorbent car/tri/ages at the concentrations indicated:
July, 1991
Page D - 14/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Surrogate Compound
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
p-Terphenyl-du
Spiked Amount (qg/cartridge
100
100
100
3.4 SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR GC/MS ANALYSIS
3.4.1 Summary of Method
The filters and adsorbent cartridge are
with appropriate solvent. The extract is c/e
(K-D) evaporator, followed by optional
chromatography to remove potential interf/eref
cloudy), optional GC/ECD/FID screening,
illustrated in Figure D/SV-3.
3.4.2 Apparatus and Materials
3.4.2.3
3.4.2.4
3.4.2.5
Glass vials
Erlenmeyer
Spatulas
3.4.2.6 Kuderna.
(Kontes K-570001-
(Kontes K-570050^
ball macro Snyder Co
219, or equivalent).
3.4.2.7
stands.
3.4.2.8
umns
on
itrated by Kuderna-Danish
Lica gel column
extract is
US analysis, as
3.4.2.1 Soxhlet extractors: Capable of extract
and adsorbent cartridges (2.3 in. x 5 in. length), si
condenser.
3.4.2.2 Pyrex glass tube furn
180°C under purified nitrogen gas
raising temperature gradually, best
odel PS-1 filter
•ask, and
ng silica gel at
:h the capability of
tainless steel.
JO-mL evaporation flask
•/graduated concentrator tubes
(lent) with ground-glass stoppers, and 3-
K-5700010500, K-50300-0121, and K-569001-
m chromatography: 1 cm x 10 cm with
For handling cartridges and filters.
osilicate glass, with conical reservoir and
ced silicone disks, and a vial holder.
3.4.2.10 (Jbove bo>^: Fo/working with extremely toxic standards and
reagents with e^p^osiohxproo'f hood for venting fumes from solvents,
reagencs, etc.
July,
Page D - 15/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.4.2.11 Vacuum oven: Vacuum drying oven system capa#le/of maintaining a
vacuum at 240 torr (flushed with nitrogen) overnight.
3.4.2.12 Concentrator tubes and a nitrogen evaporation
variable flow rate.
3.4.2.13 Laboratory refrigerator.
With a
3.4.2.14 Boiling chips: Solvent extracted
equivalent.
3.4.2.15 Water bath: Heated, with conce/tr
temperature control.
3.4.2.16 Vortex evaporator (optional)
NOTE: Reuse of glassware should be minimize
contamination. All glassware that is used, espec"
reused, must be scrupulously cleaned as soon as
glassware with the last solvent u^i&d—in__ it and then wit
mesh silicon car
.e, /or
, capable of ±5°C
poss]
the risk of cross-
ssware that is
r use. Rinse
-purity
acetone and hexane. Wash with hot water containingdetergent. Rinse with
copious amounts of tap water and\sev^?a-t—pxirtions of~dT5~frjLlled water.
Drain dry and heat in a muffle furnace^ at 400?C £o¥-Jt^hop'rs. Volumetric
glassware must not be heated in a muffr& furnace; rather, it should be
rinsed with high-purity acetone and n^xane/ After the glassware is dry and
cool, rinse it with hexane, and store £t inverted or capped with solvent-
rinsed aluminum foil in a clean environmfe
3.4.3 Reagents
3.4.3.1 Soxhlet E*tr
raphic grade, glass-
3.4.3.1.1
distilled.
3.4.3.1.2 Sodium'^Sulfate £ Anhydrous (ACS), granular (purified by
washing with methylenecbAorib^followed by heating at 400°C for 4 hrs.
in a shal]
— \ " >W
Chromatographic grade, glass-discilled.
xomatographic grade, glass-distilled.
gh purity grade.
hromatographic grade, glass-distilled.
July. 1991
Page D - 16/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.4.3.2 Extract Cleanup: Federal Reference Method 6
70-230 mesh; pre-
ride for 6 hours
in a foil-
3.4.3.2.1 Silica gel: High purity grade, type
extracted,in a Soxhlet apparatus with methylene
(minimum of 3 cycles per hour) and activated by
covered glass container for 24 hours at 180"C.
3.4.3.2.2 Sodium sulfate: Anhydrous gram
450°C for 8 hours prior to use to activate
3.4.3.2.3 Pentane: Chromatographic gr&de/ glass-distilled.
3.4.3.3 Extract Cleanup: Lobar Prepacked /Column
:olumn: /E./Merck, Darmstadt,
3.4.3.3.1 Silica gel Lobar prepac
Germany [size A(240-10) Lichroprpe
3.4.3.3.2 Precolumn containing sodium^
(purified by washing with methylene chloric
400°C for 4 hours in a shallow tray).
3.4.3.3.3 Hexane: Chromatfograp
3.4.3.3.4 Methylene chlori
distilled.
Granular, anhydrous
by heating at
3.4.4.1.2 Assernl
apparatus with 300 mi
Lee the
adsorbe
chimb1
3.4.3.3.5 Methanol: Chromatogr
3.4.4 Procedure
3.4.4.1 Soxhlet Ex^rac^ion
3.4.4.1.1 The,
Soxhlet extrac
in Figure D/sV-
g/ade, glass-distilled.
rbent are extracted by
-D evaporator, as illustrated
July, 1591
3.4.4;-
Figure
same concentration
xhlet apparatus. Charge the Soxhlet
xtraction solvent and reflux for 2 hours.
as salable it, and transfer the PUF/XAD-2
apparatus (the use of an extraction
ent are analyzed together in order to reach
on Limits (CRQLs), to avoid questionable
and to minimize cost.
traction, additional surrogate standards (see
to the Soxhlet extraction solvent at the
lined in part 3.4.4.6. The recovery of the
Page D - 17/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
surrogate standards are used to monitor for unusual/matrix effects,
gross sample .processing errors, problems with they&na^ytical method,
etc. Surrogate recovery is evaluated for acceptance/by determining
whether the measured concentration falls within/the Sa^ceptance limits.
/ /^
3.4.4.1.4 Add 300 mL of diethyl ether/hexa:
apparatus. Reflux the sample for 18 hours
cycles per hour. Allow to cool then disas
3.4.4.2
Concentration and Solvent Exchan;
.phe Soxhlet
3
3.4.4.2.1 Assemble a Kuderna-Danish
10-mL concentrator tube to a 500-mL
concentration devices or techniques /may(
equivalency is demonstrated for al
in Exhibit C.
3.4.4.2.2 Transfer the extract by pouring
drying column containing about 10 cm of anhydrdl
sulfate, and collect the extract^inthe K-D
Erlenmeyer flask and column/with 20~Eo~-3Q~jaLof 5 to
ether/hexane to complete the\ quantitative trans!
tor by attaching a
Other
lace of the K-D, if
.yte compounds listed
concentl
ict through a
sodium
Rinse the
diethyl
3.4.4.2.3 Add one or two cle
Snyder column to the evaporative
adding about 1 mL of the extractio'
Place the K-D apparatus on a hot wa
concentrator tube is
lower rounded surfafce
vertical position/of /€he appar
to complete the siona4ntrati
distillation, ttfe balls of
chambers will/not/flood wi
volume of liquid reaches
bath and allow
Snyder column and
concentrator tube wit
ope
concent^ktion_to l.O^L by
3.4.
immers«
the^flask is
clylps and^attach a three-ball
-wet the Snyder column by
solve/nt to the top of the column.
th (50°C) so that the
the hot water, and the entire
with hot vapor. Adjust the
and tfte witer temperature as required
At the proper rate of
actively chatter but the
vent. When the apparent
mfc, remove tfie K-D apparatus from the water
,nd cool for at least 5 minutes. Remove the
flask and its lower joint into the
cyclohexane. A 5-mL syringe is
ion.\The extract is now ready for further
e'i-cherjof the two following techniques.
olumn Technique
one or two clean boiling chips to the
ach a two-ball micro-Snyder column.
4 Snyder column by adding about 1 mL of
he/top^ of the column.
July, 1991~~~Page D - LS/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.4.4.2.4.3 Place the K-D apparatus on a hot wae€r\bath (50°) so
that the concentrator tube is partially immersejz in/hot water.
3.4.4.2.4.4 Adjust the vertical position of ,dhe/apparatus and the
water temperature is required to complete the concentration in 15 to
20 minutes. At the proper rate of distillationxthe nulls of the
column will actively chatter but the chamber s/wiHxnot rioted with
condensed solvent.
3.4.4.2.4.5 When the apparent volume <6f liquid reaches aboutx^. 5/mL,
remove the K-D apparatus from the wat^r Vath and allow it to drMn
for a least 10 minutes while cooline
3.4.4.2.4.6 Remove the Snyder co
lower joint into the concentrator' t
(
3.4.4.2.4.7 Adjust the final vol
NOTE: It is not necessary to bring the volume
the extract will be cleaned up by either of
cleanup methods.
3.4.4.2.4.8 Transfer the\ex
vial, label the vial and score
'and rins'e ifts flask and its
je with/0.2/mL of cyclohexane.
3.4.4.2.5 Nitrogen Slowdown Te
(from ASTM Method D3086)
3.4.4.2.5.2
rinsed down severa
3.4.4<2.5.3
below chewatei
tc/be/ome dry.
w i th eye1ohexane.
exactly 1.0 mL if
optional silica gel
d screw-cap amber
CAUTION: Gas lines from the gas source T:O the blowdown apparatus must
be stainless steel, je-6pper>sor Teflon\tubr*ig.
/ ^—\
3.4.4.2.5.1
attachment i
solvent vol
clean, dry
above the
tiibe ywith an open micro- Snyder
to\35°C) and evaporate the
•owing a gentle stream of
'a column of activated carbon)
wall of the concentrator tube must be
tith cyclohexane during the operation
of the
the tube solvent level must be kept
"ath. The extract must never be allowed
/3.4/4.2.5.4 Bring thW final volume brought to 1.0 mL with
cycrsjexane. Transfei: tie extract to a Teflon-sealed screw-cap amber
store at 4°C (±2°C) .
July, 1991
Page D - 19/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
NOTE: It is not necessary to bring the volume toi exactly 1.0 mL if
the extract will be cleaned up by either of the/Optional silica gel
cleanup methods. Final volume is brought to 1/0 ml, after cleanup.
3.4.4.3 Extract Cleanup (Optional): Federal Reference Method 610
particr
NOTE: Other extraction procedures can be used
laboratory demonstrates equivalency.
3.4.4.3.1 Pack a 6-inch disposable Paspeur/pipette (10 mm ID x 7
length) with a piece of glass wool. Push tbfe wool to the neck of the
disposable pipette. Add 10 grams of aotiv/ted sil£ca>gel in methylene
chloride slurry to the disposable pipe'tte/ Gently t^p the column to
settle the silica gel and elute the m4th^lene chloride. Add 1 gram of
anhydrous sodium sulfate to the top 4*f the^sj-lvca £^ column.
3.4.4.3.2 Prior to initial use, rinse th^columri with methylene
chloride at 1 mL/min for 1 hr. to remove any o&ace of\contaminants.
Pre-elute the column with 40 mL of pentane. Disc^a*^ the\eluate. Just
prior to exposure of the sodiunr-suJ^gate layer to the^a^r/ transfer the
cyclohexane sample extract orito the coTunlTir--uaing an additional 2 mL of
cyclohexane to complete the tXans^r^-^Aj.lpw toeTute-Tthrough the
column. DO NOT ALLOW THE COLOTTO T\ DRY.
3.4.4.3.3 Just prior to exposure^ of\^fe /odium sulfate layer to the
air, add 25 mL of pentane and continue eluxion of the column.
let ion
NOTE: The pentane f
collected on the fi/ter.
normally discarde
specific aliph
chloride/pentane/ (4/6 v/v)
equipped with a/10/mL conc^
mtains tfte aMphatic hydrocarbons
:orb^snt combinavtioX, This fraction is
interes|t>dT^this Crac/ticn may be analyzed for
column with 25 mL of methylene
'eluate in a 500 mL K-D flask
oirganics. ) Elute
tct the
itor
3.4.4.3.4 Cone
apparatus, using
extract is now ready
by GC/MS
the
per
3.4.4.4
collected fraction to 1.0 mL by the K-D
rinse the walls of the glassware. The
GC/FID or GC/ECD screening, followed
tional;
Lobar Prepacked Column Procedure
the Lobar prepacked column consists of an
pre-column containing sodium sulfate,
Ivent reservoir.
3.4.4.4?2v. ThVvColumn As /leaned and activated according to the
following cbsanup
July, 1991 — Page D - 20/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
Solvent Composition
Volume (ml
100% Hexane .
80% Hexane/20% Methylene Chloride
50% Hexane/50% Methylene Chloride
100% Methylene Chloride
95% Methylene Chloride/5% Methanol
80% Methylene Chloride/20% Methano
3.4.4.4.3 Reverse the sequence at the e
the 100 percent hexane fraction in order
Discard all fractions. Pre-elute the colum
is also discharged.
the run, and
Activate the column.
with 40 mL of hexane, which
3.4.4.4.4 Inject 1 mL of the cyclofiexane sample extract from
3.4.4.2.4 or 3.4.4.2.5, followed by/a l^mL injettLon of blank
cyclohexane. Continue elution of tW^columia^yith/20 mL of hexane, which
is also discharged. Now elute the colutoqwith lAo mL of a mixture of
methylene chloride/hexane (4:6 v/v) respectively/XCollect approximately
180 mL of the methylene chloride/hexane mixturexin aSc^D concentrator
assembly. Concentrate to 1.0 mL with the K-D assembly/'}'The extract is
now ready for optional GC/FIlTor~-S6/EC]^_screening andX#/MS analysis.
3.5 GC/MS ANALYSIS
3.5.1 Summary of Method
This method outlines a GC/MS procedure fc
pesticides, PCBs/Aroclors^-aad other serniyol
preparation (Section 4V/or optional scree
ng
the analysis of PAHs,
Lies following sample
^Section 6).
3.5.2 Interferences
3.5.2.1 Method /ntatference^ may" bes-c^used/by contaminants in solvents,
reagents, glassware,
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
placing in a muffle furnace at 450°C for 8 hours to re
3.5.2.3 The use of high purity water, reagents,
minimize interference problems. Purification of s
in all-glass systems may be required.
3.5.2.4 Matrix interferences may be caused b
coextracted from the sample. Additional clean)
may be required (see parts 3.4.4.3 and 3.4.4./).
trace organics.
ilvents helps to
distillation
3.5.2.5 The extent of interferences that/ma/ be enc
fully assessed. Although GC conditions
resolution of compounds covered by this method, othe
interfere. The use of column chroma to gifaphyf or sampl
analysis will eliminate most of these i
must, however, be routinely demonstrated tb\be free
contaminants such as contaminated solvents, g
which may lead to method interferences. A labora
for each batch of reagents used to determine if reaget
free.
tered has not been
unique
impounds may
cleanup prior to GC
The analytical system
f internal
or other reagents
pd blank is run
; contaminant-
3.5.2.6
There are concerns
3.5.3.1.1 Gas
temperature-pr
injection and
columns, and
column flow rate thr
carrier- gas -lj.nes_ must
tubing.
controllers wi-th-jrubbe
heat, ozone, N02, and ultraviolet
These problems should be addressed
Where possible, incandescent or UV-j
laboratory should be used during analyses.
3.5.3 Apparatus and Materi
3.5.3.1
and analysis,
le degradation.
.e user-prepared SOP manual,
.orescent lighting in the
Gas Chromatfog
C/MS) System
al system complete with a
suitable for splitless
'cessories, including syringes, analytical
a flow controller that maintains a constant
^emperature program operations. All GC
.cted from stainless steel or copper
(PTFE) thread sealants or flow
components/are not to be used.
must allow a
elutes fro-
demonsc:
.ome'ter: Capable of scanning from 35 to 500 amu
tiiizing 70 volts (nominal) electron energy in
tipn mode and producing a mass spectrum which
instrumentyperlformance criteria when 50 ng of
henylphosp^inei (DFTPP) is injected through the GC inlet.
ci/ion of mass spectral data, the MS scan rate
at least five scans while a sample compound
The/GC/MS system must be in a room with atmosphere
.ee/of all potential contaminants which will
July, 1991
Page D - 22/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
interfere with the analysis. The instrument must be
facility or to a trapping system which prevents the
contaminants into the' instrument room.
NOTE: DFTPP criteria must be met before any s
analyzed. Any samples analyzed when DFTPP cri
will require reanalysis at no cost to the
inted outside the
l/ease of
are
not been met
3.5.3.1.3 GC/MS interface: Any gas chron
spectrometer interface that gives acceptable
ng or less per injection, for each of the/pa/ameters of interest,
achieves all acceptable performance cri&erLa (Exhibit E), may be used.
Gas chromatograph to mass spectrometer/interfaces/^obstructed of all-
glass or glass-lined materials are recommended. /Glass can be
deactivated by silanizing with dichlprodamethylsdla^ie.
3.5.3.1.4 Data system: A computer"••s^rstemNnust/be interfaced to the
mass spectrometer that allows the continuous acquisition and storage on
machine readable media of all mass spectra ob^ainecKsAroughout the
duration of the chromatographic program. The cbHmuter^must have
software that allows searchina-j£he_GC/MS data file^&^r i^ns of a
specific mass and plotting such iorPlbrHwiaoces versus tame or scan
number. This type of plot is: de^fiaedas anSe*teTrte
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.4.3 Zero air: May be obtained from a cylinder or zero-grade
compressed air-scrubbed with Drierite or silica gel a/d 5A molecular sieve
or activated charcoal, or by catalytic cleanup of ambient air. All zero
air must pass through a liquid argon cold trap for /£inalxcleanup.
/ ^
3.5.4.4 Native and isotopically labeled analytre
calibration and spiking standards, Cambridge Iseto
Woburn, MA, 01801, 617-547-1818.
3.5.5 Standards
3.5.5.1 The Contractor must provide all/ standards /o^e used with this
contract. These standards may be used oidy/after they Kave been certified
according to the procedure in Exhibit E/ "me Contractor must be able to
verify that the standards are certified. Mahufaccurst's certificates of
analysis must be retained by the Contracb>r and^-pjresented upon request.
3.5.5.2 In order to facilitate the confirmation of "p^asticides, PAHs,
PCBs, and other SVOCs from the library search dataSthe calibration
standards must include the single—cojggonent target compv»und/ in one
standard solution in each conce/trationT?eVe-l-r^_and the noucicomponent
analytes in separate standard s^ut^rns-jj^one concerttretion level. Each
calibration standard solution mus\cantainaJl cfe*-_aporopriate surrogates
and internal standards.
3.5.5.3 When compound purity is assayed7 tc/be 98 percent or greater, the
weight may be used without correction tk calculate the concentration of the
stock solution. If they
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.5.6
PAHs Stock Standard Solutions
luminum weighing
3.5.5.6.1 Place 0.1 gram of native PAHs on a ta^ed
disk and weigh on a balance.
3.5.5.6.2 Quantitatively, transfer each to
Rinse the weighing disk with several small po
chloride. Ensure all material has been tra
with methylene chloride. The concentratio
solution of PAHs in the flask is 10 UK/I
3.5.5.6.3 Transfer the stock standard/solutions into Teflon-sealed
screw-cap bottles. Store at 4°C and protect from/ligiit. Stock standard
solutions should be checked frequently for signs /of /degradation or
evaporation, especially just prior t.p preparing/caibration standards
from them.
3.5.5.6.4 Secondary standards may be pr^&gared'•by diluting the stock
standard solutions. Working standards are tbar^ prepared from the
secondary standard solutions.
3.5.5.7
Pesticides Stock Standard Solul
3.5.5.7.1 Prepare from pure
25.0 mg (with accuracy of 0.1 m
Endosulfan I and Endosulfan II.
stock solution twice as concentrated as
pesticide analytes. Dissolve each c
volume in a 10-mL
(Concentration of
which should be S/rag/^fL.) >ma).lex^or lari
may be used if d<
ier/tali. Weigh approximately
cide analyte, except
two pesticides, prepare a
t prepared for other
in hexane and dilute to
fans) volumetric flask.
except the Endosulfans,
Volumes of stock solution
3.5.5.7.2 Transfer the
screw-cap bottles ?\Storey
solutions shouldxbe cnecjced
evaporation, especra^ly jus
from them.
stanc
zx>lutions into Teflon-sealed
'C and protect from light. Stock standard
/frequently for signs of degradation or
prior to preparing calibration standards
tandai
Working stai
3.5.5.
be prepared by diluting the stock
irds are then prepared from the
olutions
3. 5r-5^8.1 \prepare a stfock/solution of each of the nine PCB
concenrbatioriisalibration (congeners at a concentration of 1 Mg/ML in
hexane. Place eafcb.solution in a clean glass vial with a Teflon-lined
screw cap. FiH^to cne/cop so no headspace is evident. Store at 4°C if
July, 1991
Page D - 25/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
solutions are not to be used right away. Solution
indefinitely .if solvent evaporation is prevented.
3.5.5.8.2- The 9 individual PCB congeners lis
used as the calibration compounds for PCB dete
each level of chlorination is used as the co'
standard for all other isomers at that leve
decachlorobiphenyl (C110) which is used for
groups. The basis for selection of these/ca
reported and referenced in part 3.7 (Cita'ti
stable
ble D/SV-4 are
One isomer at
ation
PC
een
9) and Table D/SV-4.
3.5.5.8.3 Take aliquots of the stock/ solutions Af. fine nine PCB
concentration calibration congeners and mix together/in the proportions
that will provide a primary dilution/standard s/luoion of the
composition illustrated in Table D/Sj/-l/x^lacy/eateh solution in a clean
glass vial with a Teflon-lined screw caoand^stoye at 4°C. Mark the
meniscus on the vial wall to monitor solution voi>vme during storage;
solutions are stable indefinitely if solvent e^apora^pn is prevented.
3.5.5.8.4 For full-range
are required for CALs contai
standards, surrogates, and singf
illustrated in Table D/SV-4.
increasing level of chlorinatio
increase with level of chlorinati'
concentration solution (CAL 5) are
injections of 1 pL aliquots without
overloading.
3.5.5.9 Multicomponen
3.5.5.9.1 Tox4ph;
except for Aro/ilo
mixture.
ecause MS yes
xaphe
3.5.5.9.2
Place 0.1 gr
uminura weiahi
uisition, five calibration solutions
concentratiojisof the internal
target"cTji^pounds as
CBs decreases with
concentrations in CALs
inents of the highest
present at a concentration that allow
uration or GC column
id Aroclors)
prepared individually,
be combined in one standard
solution of each of the multicomponent
standard in_ hexane. Fbaee eatb, solution in a clean glass vial with a
Teflon-linetr"Scr^w-~cap. F-yj to^the top so no headspace is evident.
Store atr 4 ° Cif^sp lutl^ms are^npt ,to be used right away. Solutioas are
stable/inde'rinitetVxif solvent evaporation is prevented.
3.5.5.1,
of Other Semivolatiles
f each native semivolatile target analyte
disk and weigh on a balance.
3 . 5 . 5 .10 . 2^vQuantt
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
with methylene chloride. The concentration of the s
solution of semivolatiles in the flask is 10
3.5.5.10.3- Transfer the stock standard solution
screw-cap bottles. Store at 4°C and protect fr
solutions should be checked frequently for si
evaporation, especially just prior to prepari
from them.
k standard
to Teflon-sealed
j.t. Stock standard
or
standards
3.5 . 5 .10.4 Secondary standards may be
standard solutions. Working standards ai
secondary standard solutions.
3.5.5.11 Surrogate Compounds Spiking S
3.5.5.11.1 Prepare separate soluti<
contain approximately 1000 Mg/ni
the spiking solution to obtain the follov
extract when 1 pL is spiked into the cartric
Surrogate Compound
13C6-Gamma-BHC
13C12-4,4'-DDT
13C6 - 4 - monochlorob ipheny 1
13C12-3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl
13C12-2,2',3,3',5,5',6,6'-Octachlorobip
13C12-Decachlorobiphenyl
"Nitrobenzene-d5
*2-Fluorobiphenyl
*p-Terphenyl-d14
2,4,6-Tribromopheno
2 -Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
* These surrogate ^Qjnpouffr
3.5.5.12 Working_Standar
3.5.5.1
d by diluting
prepared from the
ogate compounds to
solutions, prepare
entrations in the
00
100
required; the others are optional.
pe
ultrasonic nfi^ing
r e sul t irsgx§ lu tl
1000
.ndard
lutions of 1,4-dichlorobenzene-d4 ,
,ne-d10, phenanthrene - d10 , chrysene-d12, and
ed by dissolving 100 mg of each compound in
ide. It may be necessary to use 5 to 10
e in this solution and a few minutes of
er to dissolve all the constituents. The
contain each standard at a concentration of
ortion of this solution should be added to each
July, 1991
Page D - 27/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
1 mL of sample extract. This will result in 20
standard in the 1-jtL volume of extract injected
3 . 5 . 5 . L2 . 2 Instrument performance check soluti
Prepare a solution of decafluorotriph
that a 1-^L injection will contain 50 ng
also be included in the calibration stan
3.5.5.12.3 Single-component Calibration/Standards
each internal
the GC/MS.
Prepare calibration standards
concentration levels as outlined i.\
standard should contain each comp<
internal standards, and surrogatal.compi
D/SV-1. Great care must be taken
standard solutions. Store all standarclxsolut!
screw-cap amber bottles with Teflon liners>
be prepared every twelve months at a minimum.
calibration standard (see
weekly and stored at 4°C /±2°C).
3.5.5.12.4 Multicomponent Calibration Stands
D/SV-4, CAL 3) sh
nimum of five
Each calibration
es^C.-the appropriate
utlined in Table
he integrity of all
s at 4°C (±2°C) in
standards should
tinuing
e prepared
The calibration standards
prepared at concentrations of 10Q ng/ml
which must be prepared at 500 ng/
must contain the v*fl:ernal\standardsand
te and Aroclors must be
execpt for Aroclor 1221
multicomponent standards
surrogates at 20 ng//iL.
3.5.5.13 Storage of/StaAdard^Soli:
3.5.5.13.1 Sto/e pne stock/an'
Teflon-lined screw/cap amber b/ttles
solutions at
(±a
tandard solutions at 4'
re the working standard
Ion-lined screw-cap amber bottles.
C in
3.5.5.13.2 Protec
extracts, and standard
11 standards from light. Samples, sample
pustb< stored separately.
,s must be replaced every twelve
'ith quality control check samples
3.5.5.13/3 Stock standard so^iutio,
/ ^"~ ^^^ ^\
months / or/Sooner,^vf comparison
indic/tes/a problem.
3.5.6 Ins^ruijtent Operating Con^itibns
3 . 5 . 6 . fX. Gas^x^romatograptf: /The following are the recommended gas
chromatographic atta^ytical/contlitions, as outlined also in Table D/SV-2, to
optimize conditions to~t compound separation and sensitivity.
Jul", L991
Page D - Z8/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Carrier Gas:
Linear Velocity:
Injector Temperature:
Injector:
Temperature Program:
Initial Hold Time :
Ramp Rate:
Final Temperature:
Final Hold Time:
Analytical time:
Helium
28-29 cm3/sec
250-300°C
Grob-type, splitle
Initial Temperatu
4.0 ±0.1 min.
10°C/min to 160,
increase to 30,
300°C
10 min (or
interest h,
approx.
3.5.6.2 Mass spectrometer: The folloylng/are the/required mass
spectrometer conditions for full range jiata/acquis^tio/
i
Transfer Line Temperature: 250-30
Source Temperature:
Electron Energy:
lonization Mode:
Mass Range:
Scan Time:
3.5.7 Instrument Performance Check
According
Specifications
70 volts (nominal"
Summary
full range"'data
pe4k, not to exceed
C/MS meet tuning and
ior to initiating any on-
igure D/SV-6. This is
luorotriphenylphosphine
3.5.7.1
It is necessary,
standard ma_ sp
going data collefctijbn
accomplished thro
(DFTPP).
3.5.7.2 Frequency
3 . 5 . 7 . 2 .1 ^^-^hB—instrumerttvDerfb^mance check solution of DFTPP must be
analyzed/initially aiM^once p»r 12/hour time period of operation. Also,
whenever th^TaBcTtar^oryN^kes corrective action which may change or
affect? th6 mass spectsal criteria (e.g., ion source cleaning or repair,
column replacement, etc\), Vhe instrument performance check must be
verified irrespective of\tha 12-hour laboratory requirement.
3 . S^^.2 . 2^xThe 12-hour/tim/fe period for GC/MS instrument performance
check atvl standards calibration (initial calibration and continuing
calibratio>^xchecl^-crit6ria/) begins at the injection of the DFTPP which
the laboratory\$ubmibs ap documentation of a compliance tune. The time
July, L991
Page D - 29/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
period ends after 12 hours have elapsed. In order
performance check requirements, samples, blanks,
injected within 12 hours of the DFTPP injection.
3.5.7.3 Procedure
3.5.7.3.1 Inject 50 ng of DFTPP into the
instrument conditions must be identical to
except that a different temperature 'progr
;eet instrument
tandards must be
3.5.7.3.2 DFTPP may be analyzed sepa
calibration standard.
3.5.7.4 Technical Acceptance Criteri
3.5.7.4.1 Prior to the analysis of any^^amplesV^blanks, or
calibration standards, the Laboratory must establisnvxt.hat the GC/MS
system meets the mass spectral ion abundance criba^ia fbs; the instrument
performance check solution containing DFTPP.
3.5.7.4.2 The GC/MS systemXmusNTTre-^Jisjrrument peTfcwrmance checked at
the frequency described in park 3:^. 7 .1 /2~7 The-CC^l^system must be
tuned to meet the manufacturer's\specifi/atZons, using a suitable
calibrant. The mass calibration And t^/obdtion of the GC/MS system are
verified by the analysis of the instrument performance check solution.
3.5.7.4.3
The abu
for a 50 ng injection o£-QFTP
acquired by averagang/threeNyc
immediately precefdin| following the
required, and mi/st/be accomii
elution of DFT/P.
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
>r auto tuning,
facturer's
Surce parameters
Mass peaks at
tuning is
502 and
match the
3.5.7.4.5 If the mass spectrometer has the abili
then the user may utilize this function following
specifications. Autotune automatically adjusts i
within the detector using perfluorotributylamine
m/z 69, 219, and 502 are used for tuning. Afte
completed, the PFTBA abundances at m/z 50, 69
614 are further adjusted such that their rel
selected masses of DFTPP.
3.5.7.5 Corrective Action
3.5.7.5.1 If the DFTPP acceptance cryterfa are not met, the MS must
be retuned. It may be necessary to cLean/the ion /sobrce, or
quadrupoles, or take other actions to/acbiieve the; acceptance criteria.
3.5.7.5.2 DFTPP acceptance criteria^MUSToar me/c before any standards,
performance evaluation (PE) samples, or rsquireoXblanks are analyzed.
Any samples or required blanks analyzed when^-tuning^criteria have not
been met will require reanalysis at no additionaix^cost^tp the Agency.
3.5.7.6 Documentation
Reporting requirements are
3.5.8 Initial Calibration
3.5.8.1 Summary
Prior to the an
criteria (instrum<
must be initially c
determine instr
the analyte co:
3.5.8.2 Frequenc
^.red blanks and after tuning
ieen met, each GC/MS system
five concentrations to
inearity of GC/MS response for
3.5.8.2.1 Each GC/MSxsystetevmust be initially calibrated upon award
of the con>ratTT--«heneverx-the la"feqratory takes corrective action which
may change or affect^fetie initial calibration criteria (e.g., ion source
cleaning oz^repaTrv^colUHm replacement, etc.), or if the continuing
calib/atyon acceptance^ criteria (see part 3.5.7.3.4) have not been met.
3.5/8.
remains in the 12 -hour time period after
me£tin
sampS^s
calibra
calibratio
continuing ca
July, 1991
epnance criteria for the initial calibration,
It is not necessary to analyze a continuing
the 12 -hour time period, if the initial
3) that is the same concentration as the
andard meets the continuing calibration
Page D - 31/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
technical acceptance criteria. Quantify all sample/results using the
' the RRFs fr-om. CAL 3 in the initial calibration or /the/RJRFs from the most
recent valid continuing calibration standard within £he same 12-hour
period.
3.5.8.3 Procedure
3.5.8.3.1 Set up the GC/MS system per
and illustrated in Figure D/SV-6.
3.5.8.3.2 All standard/spiking solutions/ sample .^xtracts, and blanks
• must be allowed to warm to ambient temperature (ap/proXimately 1 hour)
before preparation or analysis.
3.5.8.3.3 Tune the GC/MS system ^
criteria in part 3.5.7.1.4 for DFTPP.
ecVtnical acceptance
3.5.8.3.4 Prepare five calibration standaroXcon£a
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
ratio in the ranges found in Table D/SV-7.
3.5.8.4 Calculations
NOTE: In the following calculations, the area
primary quantitation ion unless otherwise stated
3.5.8.4.1 Relative Response Factors (RRF)
analyte target compound and surrogate usin
the appropriate internal standard. Table
ions for internal standards and surrogat
outlines primary quantitation ions to b,
pesticides.
where:
e is that of the
Area of the primary quan
be measured;
Area of the primary quantitatio
standard;
Concentration of the^ttrte-cnaj.standardy and
Concentration o5r~the^c_ompoundto^tre—measured.
D/SV-
ach PAH, PCB, and
Eq. D/SV-1
.ion for the compound to
the internal
where:
3.5.8.4.2 Percent Relative S
relative response factors (RRF)
the %RSD for all target compounds
equations:
and
ion (ZRSD): Using the
calibration, calculate
ogates using the following
Eq. D/SV-2
Eq. D/SV-3
^iation of initial response factors (per
j^k. ami
Mean of inrfial relative response factors (per
3y-8'/-3 Relative Rettentkon Times (RRT) : Calculate the RRTs for
e^ch tas^et compound andj surrogate over the initial calibration range
us ihgthe'^gpl lowing equsttic
July, L991
Page D - 33/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
RRT =
Eq. D/SV-4
where: RTC
RT,
Retention time of the target compjouncH^and
Retention time of the internal jstantiarc
3.5.8.4.4 Mean of the Relative Retention Tijfra^ (RRT): Calctt^ate
mean of the relative retention times (RRT) /for/each analyte target
compound and surrogate over the initial cadib/ation range using the
following equation:
Eq. D/SV-5
where: RRT
RRT
Mean relative retentiorNtime frir che target compound or
surrogate for each initial^i&alibration standard; and
Relative retention time for thextargVs^compounds or
surrogate for each initial calibration standard.
3.5.8.4.5 Mean Area Resj
the means of the area respt
each internal standard compot
using the following equation:
3.5.8.5
Mean ar
Area rasp
inter
Technical Acceptance
;nal Standard: Calculate
quantisation ion
ibration range
Eq. D/SV-6
3.5.8.4.6 Me
Calculate the mean
standard over th
equation:
titation ion for the
1 calibration standard.
) For Internal Standard:
tion times (RT) for each internal
range using the following
Eq. D/SV-7
Mean retention time; and
Retention^time for the internal standard for each
initial calibration standard.
'riteria
3.5.8.5.1 ^AJJ. inlr^ial' calibration standards must be analyzed at the
concentration le^v^ls descried in part 3.5.7.2.1 and at the frequency
described in part TXT ~ / n a GC/MS system meeting the DFTPP
July, 1991
Page D - 34/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
instrument performance check criteria.
3.5.8.5.2 The performance criteria for initial ^alj^ration of the CAL
3 mus t show:
Baseline separation of beta-BHC and g
Baseline separation of endrin ketone/an'
Signal/noise ratio of >5 for m/z
illustrate MS sensitivity;
Abundance of >40 percent and >(
m/z 498 for PCS congener C110 /
Lack of degradation of endr^ri
profile (EICP) for m/z 67 in
4,4'-DDE and endosulfan sulfate;
m/z 67 at the retention time of
of the abundance of m/z 67 produced by
cPCB/to
z 502 relative to
extracted ion current
time window between
hat the abundance of
de is >10 percent
d
Lack of degradation 4f 13C12-^T7trl--aDIiexamine"xf;iCPs for m/z 258
and m/z 247 in the rVterftr»a^time window^tfrrat., includes 4,4'-ODD,
4,4'-DDE and 4, 4' -DDT\m/k 258~wo]Zld/b«_grodufced by 13C12-4,4'-
DDE, and m/z 247 by 13cX4,V -DDI/. /Confirm~~that the total
abundance of both ions is\>5 \}e/ce^it of m/z 247 produced by
»C12-4,4' -DDT.
3.5.8.5.3 The rel
concentration for each
minimum response fac
compound's minimum acceptable
ponse fac\pr \RRF) at each calibration
rget\compound\nd surrogate that has a required
.e \ny.sJL be greateir than or equal to the
response factor see Table D/SV-6.
jrcent
ratiorj^range/ fop each
cimt
3.5.8.5.4
initial cali
has a required"
When an RSD. exceed^25 per-
appropriate CALs to o
concentra£ionTanae, or t"
Lve
in
deviation (%RSD) over the
target compound and surrogate that
must be less than or equal to 25 percent.
ent, analyze additional aliquots of
%RSD of RRFs over the entire
to improve GC/MS performance.
ac
pn
3 . 5 . 8 .6. 5
target compounds and
retention time for each of the semivolatile
urris^gates at each calibration level must be within
relative retention t\me units of the mean relative retention time
each compound.
3 . 5>&
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.8.5.7 The retention time (RT) shift for each d£ trhe internal
standards at each calibration level must be within/±20/0 seconds
compared to the mean retention time (RT) over the/inirial calibration
range for each internal standard.
the minimum RRF
3.5.8.5.8 The compounds listed in Exhibit C/mus me
and maximum XRSD criteria for the initial cajAbration,
made for up to four target and surrogate compounds. However\^he
for those four compounds must be greater tJlan/0.010, and the %R£tlXof
those four compounds must be less than or/equ4l to 40.0 percent for^he
initial calibration to be acceptable.
3.5.8.6 Corrective Action
3.5.8.6.1 If the technical acceptAoce c
calibration are not met, inspect the s^sr^em
necessary to clean the ion source, change
corrective actions to achieve the acceptance
er£a fcbr initial
problems. It may be
coream, or take other
3.5.8.6.2 Initial calibration—eecijnical acceptance^^riLiferia MUST be
met before any samples or required blanEs~-ai=«^snalyzed. Any samples or
required blanks analyzed whenXin^ra-t^a^^ratio^TcrTteria have not been
met will require reanalysis at\p additional cost^ojthe Agency.
3.5.8.7 Documentation
Reporting requirements_are listed \n Exhibit B.
3.5.9 Continuing Calibrate
on
3.5.9.1
Summary
Prior to th
criteria, ini
GC/MS system
calibration standar
meet the instrument sen
method, as/£TTus~E?ated in
standar d
analysis of/saniples
fivi
all
re
intern
3 . 5 . 9 .
Each GC/MS ued
eriod of
DFTPP .
quired blanks and after tuning
and LMB criteria have been met, each
checked by analyzing a continuing
to ensure that the instrument continues to
and linearity requirements of the
(SV-8. The continuing calibration
4rget compounds, surrogates, and
or analysis must be calibrated once every
The 12-hour time period begins with
3.5.9.2.2 If^6
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
samples may be analyzed. It is not necessary to anaiyze a continuing
- calibration standard within this 12-hour time perio/d, £f the initial
calibration standard .that is the same concentration a.fl the continuing
calibration standard meets the continuing calibra-tio.n technical
acceptance criteria.
3.5.9.3 Procedure
3.5.9.3.1 Set up the GC/MS system per the
and as specified by the manufacturer.
3.5.9.3.2 Tune the GC/MS system to me/t
criteria in part 3.5.7.4 for DFTPP.
ne technical acceptance
3.5.9.3.3 Analyze the CAL 3 standard /olution/coritaining all the
target analytes, surrogate compound/, arrd^inteifnal/standards using the
procedure listed in part 3.5.8.3 of fck§ initial Calibration.
3.5.9.3.4 All standard/spiking solutions""^! blinks must be allowed
to warm to ambient temperature (approximately INkiourJ^feefore preparation
or analysis.
3.5.9.3.5 Start the analy
injecting 1.0 nL of the CAL
3.5.9.4 Calculations
3.5.9.4.1 Relative Response Factoi
response factor (RRF)x-foT~se4ch
equation in part 3.3^8.4.
where
ibration by
Calculate a relative
>und and surrogate using the
3.5.9.4.2 Percent
between the raea
calibration an
each analyte e?arge-t corapo
Calculate the percent difference
rom the most recent initial
relative response factor for
using the following equation:
x 100
Eq. D/SV-8
3.5.9.5
ffe^ence between relative response
facxors;
verage relative response factor from the most
recentv initial calibration; and
Re Dative response factor from continuing
calibration standard.
chnibal Acceptance7 Criteria
3.5.9.5.1
the compounds
conbinuyhg calibration standard must be analyzed for
Exhibit C concentration levels at the frequency
July, 199L
Page D - 37/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
described in part 3.5.9.2 on a GC/MS system meeting
performance, check and the initial calibration tech,
criteria.
3.5.9.5.2 The relative response factor for e
surrogate that has a required minimum respons
greater than or equal to the compound's mini
response factor.
DFTPP instrument
acceptance
betweet
3.5.9.5.3 For an acceptable continuing/cald.brat ion, the XD
the measured RRF for each analyte/surrogate/compound of the CAL 3
standard and the mean value calculated/\sefi part 3/57]?) during initial
calibration must be within ±25 percenjr. fl.1 not, /tem/dial action must be
taken; recalibration may be necessary
3.5.9.6 Corrective Action
3.5.9.6.1 If the continuing calibration technicals-acceptance criteria
are not met, recalibrate the GC/MS instrument accJtu^ing'-fcp part 3.5.8.
It may be necessary to clean &he—icnsource, change che Column or take
other corrective actions to Achieve the~~ace«fttance criteria.
3.5.9.6.2 Continuing calibrations,technical
be met before any samples or req\ir
or required blanks analyzed when cent
not been met will require reanalysiV at ng
Agency.
3.5.9.6.3 Remedi
Possible remedies
be
fee criteria MUST
are analyzed. Any samples
calibration criteria have
additional cost to the
criteria are not met.
Flush column
instructions
t porfl
ing conditions;
J
tor liner;
according to manufacturers
pproximately 0.33 m) of the column:
Prepare
erformance of all initial calibration
equired) ;
or lesser resolution;
new continuing calibration; and
July, L991
Page D - 38/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Prepare a new concentration calibration curved
3.5.9.7 Documentation
Reporting requirements are listed in Exhibit
3.5.10 Laboratory Method Blank (LMB)
3.5.10.1 Summary
3.5.10.1.1 The purpose of the LMB is to/monitor for possible
laboratory contamination. Perform all srep/s in the analytical procedure
using all reagents, standards, surrogate compounds/isfluipment,
apparatus, glassware, and solvents th^t would be/use/a for a sample
analysis.
3.5.10.1.2 An LMB is an unused, cerbified'^&a/lte.r'/cartridge assembly
which is carried through the same extraction procedure as a field
sample. The LMB extract must contain the saae amount of surrogate
compounds and internal standards that is added coeacnxs^ample. All
field samples must be extractad^and analyzed with SH^associated LMB.
3.5.10.2 Frequency
3.5.10.2.1 Analyze an LMB aloitewlth ea£h l$atcl-f~oY/<20 samples through
the entire extraction, concentrat-ionV a^rid Analysis.
3.5.10.2.2 The laboratory may also\anal
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.10.4.3 The area response change for each of the internal standards
for the blank must be within -50 percent and +100 .percent compared to
the internal standards in the most recent continuing/calibration
analysis. -
3.5.10.4.4 The retention time shift for eac
must be within ±30.0 seconds between the bla;
continuing calibration analysis.
3.5.10.4.5 The LMB must not contain any,
concentration greater than one half of
additional compounds with elution char^
features that would interfere with
method analyte at its CRQL. If the
batch of samples is contaminated, tfc
reextracted and reanalyzed.
ids
3.5.11.
terna-L standards
recent
jet analyte at a
^must not contain
'mass spectral
measurement of a
'racted along with a
'of samples must be
3.5.10.5 Corrective Action
3.5.10.5.1 If a Contractor's/
acceptance criteria, the Cont
to be out of control. It is
that method interferences causV
glassware, and other sample stoi
discrete artifacts and/or elevatei
eliminated. If contamination is a
contamination must be investigated
MUST be taken and doc*tfnentettxbefore
3.5.10.5.2 All s
control (i.e., c
no additional c
.nical
lytical system
ility to ensure
Ivents, reagents,
Hardware that lead to
ine's in gas chromatograms be
the source of the
ropriate corrective measures
sample analysis proceeds.
!od blank that is out of
re rVextraction and reanalysis at
3 . 5 .10 . 6 Documi
Reporting requi
3 . 5.11 Sample
3.5.11.1 /S
e listed in Exhibit B.
m 3.4 is analyzed by GC/MS and quantitated by
3 .5 .11.2 . l\§efo?fe\samplas or required blanks can be analyzed, the
instrument mustxjneetrhe/GC/MS tuning, initial calibration, and
continuing calibration/technical acceptance criteria.
July, 1991
Page D - y-
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.11.2.2 If there is time remaining in the 12-hoy
a valid initial calibration or continuing calibrat
analyzed in the GC/MS system that meets the
criteria. •
instr
t,ime period with
samples may be
performance check
3.5.11.3 Procedure
3.5.11.3.1 Set up the GC/MS system per the/re
3.5.6.
3.5.11.3.2 All samples extracts, required Blanks and standard/spiking
solutions must be allowed to warm to amoieWt temperature (approximately
1 hour) before preparation/analysis. Xll/sample (^bracts and required
blanks must be analyzed under the sanjfe i/istrumervcal/conditions as the
calibration standards.
3.5.11.3.4 Add the internal standarokspikiTn^ solution to the 1.0 mL
extract to contain 20 ng//iL. For sample-xjlluti&ns, add an appropriate
amount of the internal standard spiking soitttion tb^maintain the
concentrations of the internal standards at 20xtvg//iLin^the diluted
extract.
3.5.11.3.5 Inject 1.0
data acquisition.
.GC/MS, and start
3.5.11.3.6 When all semivolatilfe ta^ge't Compounds have eluted from the
GC, terminate the MS data acquisition and: store data files on the data
system storage device. Use appropriate
-------
Exhibic D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.11.4.3 The dilution factor chosen should keep/the/response of the
largest peak for a target compound in the upper ha4f pf the initial
calibration range of -the instrument.
3.5.11.4.4 If the on-column concentration of ,any>miantrcation is performed, document
the reasons in/the' SDG Narrative. Tnfe^r/ea of a secondary ion cannot be
substituted fqr thexarea 6f afprimary ion unless a relative response
factor is calcula^ted using fa& secondary ion.
3.5.11.. 5.3 . A retentio^vtime^vj-ndow is calculated for each single
component .attaTyCe^and surriagate and for the major peaks (3 to 5) of each
multicomponent analyte^ Winotbws are centered abound the average
absolute re'tention^ti.me zpr the analyte establ ed during the initial
califa/ratjxin.
3.5/. 11/5.4 For AroclorsV a\ set of three to five major peaks is
sedectetkfor each multicompqnent analyte determination. Retention time
foi\each peak ace distermined from the calibration standards.
a mul/ticpmponent analyte in the sample is based on
pattern recwgnitiri LT/ conjunction with the elution of three to f: -e
sample peaks ofxChe standard. The number of poten-.ial quantita
peaks are listed tfe4ow /tor selected aroclors :
July, 1991
Page D - 42/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Multi-component Analyte
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Toxaphene
Number of Potential
Quantitation Peaks
5
3
4
5
5
5
5
4
3.5.11.5.5 The choice of the peaks used for mult/component analyte
identification and the recognition of/thp4e peaks'may be complicated by
the environmental alteration of the ytoxaphene oj Ar/oclors, and by the
presence of coeluting analytes, or ^natrifcx.inte/feffences, or both.
Because of the alteration of these materialsxvin tfhe environment and
aging of the Aroclor, multicomponent analyses irKsamples may give
patterns similar to, but not identical withT^^hose^Qif the standards.
Identification requires visual inspection of an^otj-scale pattern.
3.5.11.6 Calculations
3.5.11.6.1 Calculate target
following equation:
July, 1991
or thecompou
targ
Area esp/se
quanjeitation
st
Volume
Volume
Dilution
tions/using the
Eq. D/SV-9
tj6 be measured. The primary
compounds, internal
in Table D/SV-8 and
standard. The target
sted with their associated internal
e D/SV-3;
standard injected in nanograms (ng);
e mo"9-c recent continuing calibration as
, STP;
act injected in microliters
extract in microliters (^L); and
for the extract. If there was no dilution,
the sample was diluted, the Df is greater
NOTE: Toral PCB">spnce6trXtion in each sample extract is obtained by
summing isomeixgroup^-conxfentrations .
Page D - 43/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.11.6.2 The equation in part 3.5.11.6.1 is also/us/d for
calculating the concentrations of the non-target compounds. Total area
counts (or peak heights) from the total ion chrom&tograms are to be used
for both the non-target compound to be measured /(A^Sand the internal
standard (A;s) . Associate the nearest internal/staiKlard"x£ree of
interferences with the non-target compound to/be/measured.^"^A relative
response factor (RRF) of one (1) is to be as/umsti. The""value fT?om this
quantitation shall be qualified as estimate/d^S^I") (estimate
lack of a compound-specific response factor)^nd "N" (presumpti^
evidence of presence), indicating the quantitative and qualitative^
unce. ainties associated with this non-Garget component. An estimated
concentration should be calculated for/4.11/tentatively identified
compounds as well as those identified/as/unknowns/ Jfhis estimated
concentration must be calculated for/all/ tentative\fl identified
compounds as well as those identified
3.5.11.6.3 Surrogate Percent Recovery
percent recovery using the following equatiot
%£/=
x 100
Calculate the surrogate
Eq. D/SV-10
where:
Qd - Quantity determinedN
Qa = Quantity added to sample/
Determine if the surrogate percent
follows:
Surrogate
13 C6-gamma-BHC
13C12-4,4'-DDT
13C6-4- monochloro
13C12-3,3' ,4,4'-t
13C12-2,2',3,3',5,
13C12-dechlorobiphenyl
Nitrobenzene-dj
2-Fluorobiphe
p-Terpnenyl
2,4,6-Trib, '
2-Fluoro
Pheno1 -
meets the specifications as
coverv Limits
35-150%
35-150%
35-150Z
35-150%
35-150%
35-150%
35-150X
35-150%
35-150%
35-150%
35-150%
35-150%
ponse Change (%ARC) : Calculate the percent
for the sample/blank analysis compared to
ng /calibration check standard (CAL 3) analysis
tandard compounds using the following
July, 1991
Page D - 44/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
-£ x 100
Eq. D/SV-11
where:
%ARC
A, =
ft/(RTS): Calculate
lank analysis and the
analysis for each of
on:
Eq. D/SV-12
3.5.11.7.2 Int
samples must b/
If the retent
0.50 minutes
if samples are an2
calibration, the chrSt
malfunction
internal
sample/
hould not exceed ±40
Percent area response change;
Area response of the internal
analysis; and
Area response of the internal
continuing calibration stand
This area change for the internal stan<
percent.
3.5.11.6.5 Internal Standard Reten
the retention time shift (RTS) bet
most recent continuing calibration c
the internal standards using the followi'
where:
RTS =
RTC -
Retention time
Retention time o
3.5.11.7 Technical Acceptance Cri
3.5.11.7.1 All target compound con
upper limit of the
(excluding the compound peak,
detector.
calibration.
itions must not exceed the
and no compound ion
t,vem; front) may saturate the
July, 1991
;Ci retention times in all
ately after data acquisition.
andard changes by more than
continuing calibration standard or CAL 3,
the same 12-hour sequence as the initial
ic system must be inspected for
as required. The SICP of the
t be f&onitored and evaluated for each field and QC
axe described in detail in the instructions for
tandard Area Summary. If the SICP area for
es by more than a factor of ± 40 percent of
m must be inspected for malfunction and
ate. If the analysis of a subsequent sample
he system is functioning properly, then
ired.
3.5.11.7.3 wken target/compounds are below CRQLs but the spectrum
Page D - 45/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
meets the identification criteria, report the concentration with a "J."
For example,- if CRQL is 3 ng and concentration of / nj/is calculated,
report as "3J ."
3.5.11.8 Corrective Action
3.5.11.8.1 If the sample technical accepta:
surrogates and internal standards are not
surrogate and internal standard solutions,/ani
It may be necessary to recalibrate the i
corrective action procedures to meet th<
technical acceptance criteria.
3.5.11.8.2 If the Contractor needs
dilution to have all the target com:
range and to have all compound ions no
(excluding the peaks in the solvent
contact the Region for instructions.
tent or take other
internal standard
than one (1) sample
e initial calibration
the detector
SMO. SMO will
3.5.11.8.3 Sample analysis t^chaicaiacceptance crft«rjLd MUST be met
before data are reported. Samples contaffilnate4__from laboratory sources,
or associated with a contaminated\lBe~ehotLj>lank craSy-gamples analyzed
not meeting the technical acceptance crita?ia/T«rLL_re/quire reanalysis
and/or reextraction at no additional\cost/to/the Agency.
3.5.11.8.4 Sample reruns performed\as a re suit of suspected matrix
interferences beyond thescope of the\metrvod will be reviewed on a case-
by-case basis for payment put^oses by tt^e Project Officer.
3.5.11.8.5 The s
must be reanalyze/
demonstrate tha
This must be a
meets the SIC
samples analyze
3.5.11.8.6
standards
problem
control/ of
ana ly stis
initfal
with^SIOP areas outside the limits
made^, then the laboratory must
em is functioning properly.
a standard or sample that
r corrections are made, the reanalysis of
stem was malfunctioning is required.
the SICP areas for all internal
imits (± 40 percent), then the
is/considered to have been within the
submit only data from the
he contract limits. This is considered the
reported as such on all data deliverables.
of the sample does not solve the problem,
de the contract limits for both analyses,
then submit thexSICP c sample data from both analyses.
Distinguisn~betweeh\r / / -ai. analysis and the re-analysis on all data
deliverables, us-ing c^c /ample suffixes specified in Exhibit B.
Document in the SDG^tJarifative all inspection and corrective actions
July, 1991
Page D - 46/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
taken.
3.5.11.9 Documentation
Reporting requirements are listed in Exhibit B.
3.5.12 Performance Evaluation (PE) Samples
3.5.12.1 Summary
3.5.12.1.1 The performance evaluation s4mp/es will assist the Agfericy
in monitoring laboratory performance. ^The/laboratory will not be
informed as to which compounds are contained in t)tfe^E samples or the
concentrations.
3.5.12.1.2 The PE sample containing kn~own concentrations of analytes
is analyzed by the laboratory to demonstrafettv/that it can obtain
acceptable identifications and measureme~n^s witknrocedures used to
analyze environmental samples containing tnVvsamex'&r similar analytes.
Analyte and their concentrations are unknown b^xthe ahalyst.
3.5.12.3.2
described in
Che PE sample
3 . 5 .12.2 Frequency
The Laboratory must extrac
PE sample once per sample deli
3.5.12.3 Procedure
3.5.12.3.1 The
PUF/XAD-2 samples from the
instructions cone
samples.
:he results of the
le.
samples on filter and
5 will come with
ure required for the PE
?E sample using the procedure
internal standards solution to
ilyze the PE sample as described in 3.5.
for calculations.
ce Criteria
lust be analyzed on a GC/MS system meeting
libration, and continuing calibration
ia at the required frequency.
must be extracted and concentrated according
July, 1951
Page D - 47/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.12.5.3 The PE sample must be prepared and ana
blank that met the blank technical acceptance cri
3.5.12.5.4 The percent recovery for each of
within the acceptance windows listed in part 3
3.5.12.5.5 The area response change betwee
recent continuing calibration check standa
internal standards must be less than or eo/ual
percent.
3.5.12.5.6 The retention time shift
recent continuing calibration check
internal standards must be within ±3,
with a method
must be
3.5.12.5.7 In addition to complying
acceptance criteria, the laboratory will
identifying and quantifying the compounds inc
The Agency will notify the laboratory of unaccep
3.5.12.6 Corrective Action
most
le and the most
for each of the
PE/sample technical
;ible for correctly
the PE sample.
ormance.
3.5.12.6.1 If the PE sample tVchftical acydepraRce__cr/teria for the
internal standard and surrogates\arev not/met: , check calculations,
standard solutions and instrument \perEormaiice. It may be necessary to
recalibrate the instrument or take \ther (Corrective action procedures to
meet the technical acceptance criteria
3.5.12.6.2 Specif i
criteria associat
Meet mi
Repli
.borators
le:
meet the following
rd in Exhibit C;
accur
Audit
identified ana
ysampule dataware re^
iabVe performancexfo:
s Contractor failsNti
r/a or achieves a sai
tn*t is not limited)
within ±30 percent RSD; and
.ss than or equal to 30 percent for
E sample.
le technical acceptance criteria MUST be met
orted. Also, the Contractor must demonstrate
compound identification and quantification.
leet the PE sample technical acceptance
of less than 75 percent, the Agency may
'the following actions: reduction of the
n of sample shipment, a site visit, a full
data auoiJ^, ano/pr require/the laboratory to analyze a remedial PE
sample, and^or a cTNnt^act/sanction, such as a Cure Notice.
July, 199L
Page D -
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.12.7 Documentation
Reporting requirements are listed in Exhibit B.
3.5.13 Identification of Target Compounds
Jounfcl "fcist (fC*^, Exhibit
tile interp^tatban of
ic/trum to the mass spectrum
3.5.13.1 The compounds listed in the Target Co
C, shall be identified by an analyst competent
mass spectra by comparison of the sample mass
of a standard of the suspected compound.
verify the identifications:
• Elution of the sample compound at t
as the standard compound, and
• Correspondence of the sample comjKmn
spectra.
3.5.13.2 PCBs are identified and measured withxsj>ecia4 software, using
information found in Table D/SV-7 and the criteria>resent&d in Table D/SV-
4. The intensity ratio of the two_jmajor ions in the mb^eculAr cluster (see
Table D/SV-10) for each homolog/is the~^raje*L_identificatio>ri criteria used.
A ±20 percent range in this ratio aTOundthe theoreTrteaJL or expected value
is considered acceptable. The labeled surrogTates^are examined for correct
retention time and the absence of rntecference /s showtrby the ratio of
selected ion abundances from the molecular /on/cluster.
Two/croteria must be sat
ive retention time
jspect
used to
repo/ted7 PCB coi
3.5.13.3 The identification
calibration utilizing th<
homolog group with respect to
(phenanthrene-d10 may
a response factor wi
This response facto
group. Thus,
different inst
method of quantit
sensitivities that ma
the 42 tetrachloro PCB i
during initial
calibration
NOTE: . Fo,
algorit
and quantrficacion extends from the
.ve response factors (RRFs) for each PCB
chryseneNi12 internal standard
ed). The primary ion is used to calculate
ary \pn of the internal standard.
;ember of a specific homolog
ions are corrected for the
C1T (homolog) group. This
however, take into account the range of
thin a single homolog series, e.g., among
Therefore, use the mean RRF calculated
the KRF. calculated in the continuing
sensitAvicies of eacr
iers.
3.5.1'
(for
(for
be examined aftd. comps
calibration. Report
Automated data interpretation, a linear fit
s concentration data.
ned on the special PCB qualitative report
ified as PCBs) and the quantitation report
B isomer groups. Individual spectra should
propriate spectra acquired during
values to three significant figures.
July, 1991
Page D - 49/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5.13.5 For establishing correspondence of the GC relative retention
time, the same.compound RRT must be within ±0.06 RRT uftiitfe of the RRT of
the standard compound. For reference, the standard niust/be run on the same
shift as the sample. If coelution of interfering compounds prohibits
accurate assignment of the sample compound RRT from the extracted ion
current profile for the primary ion, the RRT rausy be/assigned cy^using the
total ion chromatogram.
3.5.13.6 For comparison of standard and sam
mass spectra obtained on the Contractor's
standard spectra may be used for identific
Contractor's GC/MS meets the DFTPP daily
criteria. These standard spectra may be
obtain reference relative retention time's
3.5.13:7 The guidelines for qualitative
mass spectra are as follows:
Le/tompound mass spectra,
/are required. These
only if the
acceptance
analysis used to
3.5.13.7.1 All ions present in the standard mas
intensity greater than 10 perjaeut^must be present
spectrum.
n by comparison of
3.5.13.7.2 The relative inte
Table D/SV-10 must agree within
sample spectra. (Example: for a:
in the standard spectra, the corre
between 30 and 70 percent.)
~^_
3 .5.13 . 7 . 3 Ions gpeatej^thari
present in the standard spetet
the analyst making tfte comparison.
FAVOR FALSE POSITIVE. All o/omp,
must be reported yith thei/ spectra.
at a relative
sample
ve
specified in
'the standard and
an abundance of 50 percent
sample ion abundance must be
£he sample spectrum but not
idered and accounted for by
ification process should
g the identification criteria
3.5.13.7.4 If"^axcompvbvpid cannot be verified by all of the criteria in
part 3.5.8.2, but rtvthe technical judgement of the mass spectral
interpretation specialist:, the^identif ication is correct, then the
Contractorx-sttaTt~Tf«^prt tha^ iden10 percent of
or/in this method shall be tentatively identified
NIST Mass Spectral Library. (Compounds with a
July, 1991
Page D - 50/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
peak area response less than 10 percent of the area res
nearest internal, standard and compounds which elute be
compound elutes are not required to be searched in th/s
after visual comparison of sample spectra with the
will the mass spectral interpretation specialist a
identification. Computer generated library searc
normalization routines if those routines would mj
unknown spectra when compared to each other.
for the
the first target
fashion.) Only
library searches
tentative
3.5.14.3 Guidelines for Making Tentative Id/n
3.6
library or
3.5.14.3.1 Relative intensities of majrir
spectrum (ions greater than 25 percent/of
be present in the sample spectrum.
/ons in the reference
;he most/^bjundant ion) should
3.5.14.3.2 The relative intensitis o
within ±20 percent. (Example: For
percent in the standard spectra, the cor
should be between 30 and 70 percent.)
3.5.14.3.3 Molecular ions
present in sample spectrum.
>e ma/jor/ions should agree
th an abundance of 50
jspondiiig sample ion abundance
sent in reference sp
should be
3.5.14.3.4 Ions present in £l^e s>ample~~s~
reference spectrum should be re\iewed fo
contamination or presence of co-eX}.uting>
ctrumbut dot in the
ptfss ible~~tiackground
compounds.
3.5.14.3.5 Ions present in the ref^renc4 spectrum but not in the
sample spectrum should--l5e~-i?eviewed forypossible subtraction from the
sample spectrum because of background contamination or coeluting
compounds. Data syste^fTTib^ary ^reductionypr^grams can sometimes create
these discrepancies.,
3.5.14.3.6 If/ ii/the tecKnio-al juctg^ment of the mass interpretation
spectral spec^alis-t. no vaQid/tentativeldentif ication can be made, the
compound shouRKbe r^p^rVed/as unknown. The mass spectral specialist
should give additiianal classification of the unknown compound, if
possible (e.g., unknown phtfea^ate, unknown hydrocarbon, unknown acid
type, unkno>nt--«fe4j2ri.natedvxcompobnd) . If a probable molecular weight can
be distinguished, intrude it>
GC/FIE/OR/GC/ECD OPT^CQNAL^CREENING METHODOLOGY FOR PAHs, PESTICIDES,
AND fCBs/AROCLORS
3.6.1 Susfmary^of Method
As an
approximate fhe app
dilution prior tb~\Quan€
air s^mpj/e is screened prior to GC/MS analysis to
ria£e c4nge of concentration of analyte compound for
Screening is accomplished
at^n with the GC/MS.
July,
Page D - 51/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
utilizing a gas chromatography coupled to specific detectors. For PAHs,
flame ionization.detector (FID) is employed, while for pesticides and
Aroclors an electron capture detector (ECD) is used,/as/Illustrated in
Figure D/SV-5. To achieve maximum sensitivity, the/extra«t from part 3.4
must be concentrated to 1 mL. Extracts may be concen^M^tedrasJLng a two-
ball micro-snyder column attached to a K-D appar<
3.6.2 Apparatus
3.6.2.1 Gas chromatograph: The gas chro:
adequately regulate temperature in order
program and have a flow controller that m,
rate throughout temperature program oper
suitable for splitless injection and ha
including syringes, nalytical columns,
3.6.2.2 GC column: 30 m x 0.25 mm ID fuse
thickness (DB-5, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, or
3.6.2.3 Electron capture detec
(argon/methane) or nitrogen acci;
GC/ECD system must be in a room
demonstrated to be free of all cof
analysis. The instrument must be ve
trapping system which prevents the
instrument room.
aph (GC) system must
reproducible temperature
ant column flow
system must be
accessories
column, 1.0 /*m filter-
£>•
The makeup gas mu^thfe P-5, P-10
;ent specification. The
s been
erfere with the
to ,fcuGfeide the facility or to a
bf/contaminants into the
3.6.2.4
Flame ionization det
3.6.2.5 Data syste
GC/ECD. The data sy,
throughout the dur
the minimum, the
data. Also, the
in order to report
this method.
3.6.3 Reagents
The
choose
in the
data i,
hydro
leak
gas . All
copper
controllers with r
terfaced to the GC/FID or
us acquisition of data
program and must permit, at
(peak height or peak area)
be able to rescale chromatographic data
meeting the requirements listed within
je applications is helium. Laboratories may
:rier gas, but must clearly identify its use
divider pages preceding raw chromatographic
*y. Laboratories that choose to use
caution in its use. Use of a hydrogen
when hydrogen is used as the carrier
Lnes1 must be constructed from stainless steel or
ttiluoroethylene (PTFE) thread sealants or flow
^onents are not to be used.
Julv, 1991
Page D - DZ/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.6.4 Standard Preparation
3.6.4.1 Single-component Standards
3.6.4.1.1
3.5.5.
Prepare stock standard solution
to section
3.6.4.1.2 Prepare the screening standa/d
the stock solution in an appropriate solj
outlined in Table D/SV-1.
3.6.4.2
Multicomponent Standards
3.6.4.2.1 Prepare a stock solution
Toxaphene/Aroclors as in part 3.5
3.6.4.2.2 Take an aliquot of th^xstocf
standard and mix with hexane to give
ng//jL.
ion of the Aroclor
ncentration of 10
3.6.5 Instrument Operating Conditio
GC Column:
Carrier Gas:
Flow Rate:
Column Program:
Initial Time:
Rampe Rate:
Final Temperature:
3.6.6 Retention Time (
3.6.6.1 Before
must be establis
system is within
the standard containr
determination over a 72-
±0.5 minutes o^£—the—cetentio
3.6.6.2
times fo
standar
substicut
devel/p a
retent
new GC co
notebook
assurance
DB-5 fu\ed
bonded,
Helium, 28
1 cm/minute.
Initial Tempe
1 min
methyl siloxane
to 3"C/min
July, 1591
he retention time windows
2-hour period. Make sure the
ng conditions. Make three injections of -
ipounds for retention time window
.od. The retention window is defined as
firoesxfor each standard.
by th«:Lab0s]
check ol
idard desolation of the three absolute retention
standard. In those cases where the
,ular standard is zero, the laboratory must
>n of a close eluting, similar compound to
indow. The laboratory must calculate
standard on each GC column and whenever a
ie data must be noted and retained in a
as/part of the user SOP and as a quality
ical system.
Page D - 53/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
s must be allowed
3.6.7 Sample Analysis
3.6.7.1 All standards,- field and QC samples, and b,
to warm to ambient temperature before preparation o
3.6.7.2 Inject 1 /iL of the extract using the
technique when using capillary column.
NOTE: Smaller volumes (less than or equal to
automatic devices are employed.
3.6.7.3 Record the volume injected and
units or peak height.
3.6. 4 For each single component and^surrogate / a RT is measured in
each of the calibration standards analysesxf ana
analyte;
Lyte; and
3.6.7.5 A retention
analyte and surrogate/and/for te
multicomponent analytfe. /Windows) are cent
retention time for jzfae/analyte
is calcurated\for each single component
peaks \{ 3/to 5) of each
ound the average absolute
ng the initial calibration.
3.6.7.6 Identify the\singl^ component analyte peaks based on the
retention time windows estasistted during the initial calibration sequence.
Single component analyce* are Identified when peaks are observed in the RT
window for the analyte on the GC columns.
3.6.7.7
each multi
peak are 4et
multico
/" /
conjunctions with
The number
aroclors>
et of^^ehre^ to five major peaks is selected for
termir^ion. Retention time windows for each
calibration standards. Identification of a
iple is based on pattern recognition in
three to five sample peaks of the standard.
quanttitaltion peaks are listed below for selected
July, 1991
Page D - 34/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Multicomponent Analvte
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Toxaphene
Number of Potential
Quantitation Peaks
3.6.7.8 The choice of the peaks used £a/t
identification and the recognition of those
environmental alteration of the toxapher
of coeluting analytes, or matrix interi
alteration of these materials in the em
raulticomponent analytes in samples may ,
identical with, those of the standards. Identl
inspection of an on-scale pattern.
3.6.7.9 Calculate the concen
using the following equation:
where:
CF =
Vi -
Df =
3.6.7.10 The calibrati
initial calibration If tb7
calibration s^ere baseo^xi peak
the sample/musj^-be~~i>as^ed oh^peak
t analyte
complicated by the
and by the presence
h. Because of the
aging of the Aroclor,
similar to, but not
requires visual
ent analyte by
Eq. D/SV-14
then use .peair height to"
;al standard (per ng) ;
) ; and
If the extract is not
extract is diluted, Df is
used are those from the most recent
factors used in the initial
len the response of the analyte in
Similarly, if peak height was used,
nine the concentration in the sample.
Jsing the external calibration procedure, determine the identity
3i-<$^antity of each component peak in the sample chromatogram through
retention time window and concentration level of standards.
3-6.7.12 I&x^s rebtimmendfed xfhat extracts be diluted so that all peaks are
on scale. OverI^Rping>/aks/are not always evident when peaks are off
July, 199L
Page D - 55/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
scale. Computer reproduction of chromatograms, manipulated7 to ensure all
peaks are on scale over a 100-fold range, are acceptable ift linearity is
demonstrated. Peak height measurements are recommended ofver peak area
integration when overlapping peaks cause errors in area integration.
3.6.7.13 Establish daily retention time windowsxior/eacn^-analyte^ Use
the absolute retention time for each analyte as «ie /midpointc-f theVindow
for that day. The daily retention time window yeqjials the midpoin^t
times the standard deviation.
3.6.7.14 Tentative identification of an
sample extract falls within the daily rete
3.6.7.15 If no sample peaks are detect
deflection, the undiluted extract is ac
sample peaks are greater than the 80 perce
the dilution necessary to reduce the major
scale deflection. Use this dilution factor to df
GC/MS analysis.
3.7
BIBLIOGRAPHY
pea
when a peak from a
w.
ess than full scale
analysis. If any
lection, calculate
ween half and full
extract prior to
3.7.1 Glaser, J.A., D.L. Forest, G>
"Trace Analyses for Wastewaters", Envi
3.7.2
1980.
Ballschmiter, K. and M. Zell, FreVenius/Z. Anal.
'and W.L. Budde,
mol. 15, 1426, 1981.
. , 302, 20,
3.7.3 "Carcinogens - W<
Service, Center for Dise
Safety and Health, Publyca
3.7.4 "OSHA Safety/and^ Health
Occupational Safety
1976.
3.7.5 "Safety in Academic
^oc —• Publicat
3.7.6 Mul
L.M. Safe,
Properties
arcinogenV1, Department of Health
al Ins^iKute for Occupational
977.
3.7.7
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
PolychLorinated Biphenyls as Isomer Groups", Anal. Chem.
1985.
3.7.9 Rote, J.W. and W.J. Morris, "Use of Isotopic Abundance/Ratios in
Identification of Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Mass Spe/trdmetry" J Assoc
"Tie. Anal. Chem. 16(1), 188, 1973. '
3.7.10 Methods For Organic Chemical Analysis of MunicXp^Kand
Wastewater, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, EPA-600/4-82-(H7July, 1983>
3.7.11 Method 680: Deterioriation of Pesticides/and PCBs in Water an-.
Soil/Sediment by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spect/rom/try, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and .Support laboratory
Cincinnati, OH, Draft April, 1987.
3.7.12 Method 8270A: Test Methods for ^yalvia^ing Solid Waste, U.S.
Environmental Protection Aency, Office of S*kUd Wa^e and Emergency Response
Washington, D.C., SW-846, Third Edition, November, 19
fage D - 57/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-1
COMPOSITION AND APPROXIMATE CONCENTRA1]
CALIBRATION SOLUTIONS
CAL 1
Target Compound
PAHS
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
2-MethylnaphthaLene
Naphthalene
2-Naphthylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
OTHER SVOCs
Acetophenone
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
p-Biphenylamine
Bis(n-butyl)phthala
Butylbenzylphthalate
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chloroani1ine
Bis(2-chloroeth
Diethyl Phtha
2,4-Dimethyl
DimethyIpht
4,6 - initr/D-2/methylphenol
2,4-Dini
2 ,4-Dini/^ro
Bis(2-ethy
Hexachlorobenz"
Hexachlorocyclope
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
July, 1991
Page D - D8/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4-Methyl phenol
2-Methyl phenol .
3-Nitroaniline
2-Nitroaniline •
Nitrobenzene
4-Nitrodiphenyl
2-Nitrophenol
Nitrophenols (mixed)
Bis(n-octyl)phthalate
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
o-PhenyIpheno1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
PESTICIDES
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Bendiocarb
Benzidine
alpha-BHC
ganuna-BHC (Lindane)
Captan
alpha-Chlordane
gamma-Chlordane
Chlordane (Technical)
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Chlorothalonil
Chlorpyrifos
Daethai (DCPA)
4,4'-ODD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Diazinon
Dichlorvos (DDVP)
Dicofol
Dieldrin
Endosulfan
Endosulfan
Endrin
Endrin Aldeh/de
Endrin keto,
Folpet
Heptachl
HeptachVor
Mirex
Oxychlordane
Parathion
400
400
500
200
400
400
500
400
400
400
100
500
500
500
400
400
400
500
500
500
400
100
100
100
100
500
500
400
400
400
400
500
400
800
800
1,000
400
• 800
800
1,000
800
800
800
200
1,000
1,000
1,000
800
800
800
1,000
1,000
1,000
800
200
200
200
200
1,000
1,000
800
800
800
800
1,000
800
July, 1991
Page D - 39/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
cis/trans-Permethrin
Prop'oxur
Resmethrin
Ronne1
Toxaphene
PCB Calibration Congeners
C12
Cl!
Cls
C17
C18
Cl,
Clio
Polybrominated biphenyls
Internal Standards
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Naphthalene-d8
Acenaphthene - d10
Phenanthrene-d
Chrysene-d12
Perylene-d12
Surrogate Compounds
13C6- Gamma -BHC
13C12-4,4'-DDT
13C6-4-Monochl'
10
JC.,-3,3',4,4'-Teti
.orobi
13,
C12-2,2',3.3',5,5'.6,6'-O.
13C12 - Decachlorob ipheny
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
2 -Fluorophenal
Phenol-d5
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
800
200
200
400
L.OOO
1,000
L,000
400
400
400
July, L99L
Page D - '60/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-2
GC/MS OPERATING CONDITIONS
Activity
Gas Chromatographv
Column
Carrier Gas
Injection Volume
Injector Temperature
Temperature Program
Initial Column Temp.
Initial Hold Time
Program
Final Temperature:
Final Hold Time
Mass Spectrometer
Transfer Line Temperatur,
Source Temperature:
Electron Energy:
lonization Mode:
Mass Range:
Scan Time:
Conditions
J&W Scient
phenylmethj
film tt
DB-5 cross
Llicone (30 m x 0.
less) or equivalent
en
July, 199L
32
5%
1.0
28-29 cm3/sec at
litless
1 min. Increase
ompounds of interest
250-300\C
Accordingxto Manufacturer's Specifications.
0 volts (nominal)
, full range data acquisition
scans per peak, not to exceed 1
second per scan.
Page D - 61/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-3
INTERNAL STANDARDS FOR SEMIVOLATILE GC/MS
1. 4-Dichlorobenzene-di
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2 -Fluoropheno1
Hexachloroethane
2-Methyl phenol
4-Methyl phenol
Phenol-d;
Naphthalene-da
Acetophenone
p-Biphenylamine
B i s ( 2
chloroethoxy)methane
4-Chloro- 3-methylpl;
4-Chloroaniline
2,4-Dimethyl phei
Isophorone
2-Methylnaphth=
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Nitrobenzene-i
4-Nitrodiphenyl
2-Nitropl;
Nitrophe
.cenaphth>
Acenaphthyler
Diethyl Phthala£e\^ /
Dimethylphthalate ^^
4/s,Dinitrophenol
nitrotoluene
!orobiphenyl
ene
.achlorocyclopentadie
aphthylamine
oaniline
2,4 T
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
rTrichlorophenol
July, 1991
Page D - 62/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-3 (Continued)
Internal Standards for Semivolatile GC/MS
|/ysis
Phenanthrene - dtn
Aldicarb
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
13CS-Gamma-BHC
Anthracene
Bendiocarb
Bis(n-butyl)phthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
Captan
Chlorothalonil
Chlorpyrifos
Dacthal (DCPA)
Diazinon
Dichlorvos (DDVP)
4,6-Dinitro-2-
methylphenol
Endosulfan I
Fluoranthene
Folpet
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Oxychlordane
Parathion
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloropheno1
Phenanthrene
o-Phenylphenol
Polybrominate'd biphenyls
Propoxur
Ronnel
Chrvsene-d1?
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
B i s ( 2
ethylhexyl)phthalap
alpha-Chlordane
gamma-Chlordane
Chlordane (Technical)
Chrysene
4,4'-ODD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
13C12-4,4'
Dicofol
Dieldrij
Endosul
Endrin
Endrin All
Methoxychlo^
cis/trans-Pei
Pyrene
jhrin
'Toxaphet
-DDT
2hy\e
rl-d
July, L991
14
Monochl/orobiphenji
13C6 -4 yMonochlc^Bobiphf
D ichLx>r oliS ipheny Is""
rriahlo/tobiphenyls
Tetrachlorobiphenyls
V C iSsT 3 . 3 ' . 4 , 4
TsXachlorolHphenyl
Penta^hlorols^phenyls
xachlo^isob ipl^eny Is
achlorob-iphenyls
Benzo(a)P>
Benzo (b) fluora*vtheri€
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Beftstp (k) f luoranthene
lis (A- oc tyl) phthalate
)ib4nzo(a,h)anthracene
Endrin ketone
mdeno (1, 2 , 3 - c, d) pyrene
lirex
,2-2.>>' , 3 , 3 ' , 5, 5' , 6 . 6 ' •
Oc t acntoropiph eny1
NonachTorobiphenyls
ilorobiphenyl
^Ci2/Decachlorobiphenyl
Page D - 63/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambienc Air
TABLE D/SV-4
PCB CONGENERS USED AS CALIBRATION ST,
PCS Isomer Group Congener Number*
Concentration Calibration Standard
Honochlorob iphenyl
D ichlorob iphenyl
Trichlorobiphenyl
Tetrachlorobiphenyl
Pentachlorobiphenyl
Hexachlorobiphenyl
Heptachlorobipehnyl
Octachlorobiphenyl
Nonachlorobiphenylb
Decachlorobiphenyl
2,2-3,3',4,4',5,5',6,6'
Retention Time Calibration Standar
Tetrachlorobiphenyl
Pentachlorob iphenyl
Nonachlorobiphenyl
2
2,3
,4,5
2,2',4,6
2,2',3,4,5'
2,2'4,4',5,6'
2,2'3,4',5,6,6'
2,2'3,3',4,5',6,6'
3,3',4,4'
2,2',4,6,6'
2,2',3,3',4,5,5',6,7'
A Numbered according to the s;
b Decachlorobiphenyl is used
ion 3.7, Citation 2).
-and decachlorobiphenyl isomer groups.
July, 1991
Page D - 64/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Mass
51
68
69
70
127
197
198
199
275
365
441
442
443
TABLE D/SV-5
DFTPP KEY IONS & ION ABUNDANCE CRITi
Ion Abundance Or
30-80% of mass/19
Less than 2%/ot>mass 69
Present
Less than/2% of mass 69
25-752
Le s s
Base peS
5-9% of ma!
198
itive abundance
July, 1991
10-30% of mass 19
Page D - 65/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-6
RELATIVE- RESPONSE FACTOR CRITERIA FOR INITIAL
CALIBRATION OF SEMIVOLATILE TARGET CO;
NTINUING
Minimum
RRF
Semivolatile
Compounds
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
2-Nitropheno'l
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
bis(-2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(-2-Chloroethyl)ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(l, 2, 3-cd)pyrene"
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophe^l
Phenanthrene
Phenol-d5
Pyrene
Terphenyl/d14
July, 199L
Page D - 66/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-6
RELATIVE RESPONSE FACTOR CRITERIA FOR INITIAL
CALIBRATION OF SEMIVOLATILE TARGET COMP,
(continued)
INUING
SemLvolatile
Compounds
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Minimum
RRF
Maximum
2
imum
:iaium trajcimu
RSD/X. XDifrf
July,
Page D - 67/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-7
QUANTITATION. CONFIRMATION, AND INTERFERENCE CHEC
INTERNAL STANDARDS, AND SURROGATE CO*
FOR PCBs,
Analyte/
IS/Surr. Comp.
PCB Isomer Group
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
Cl,
Clio
Quant.
Ion
188
222
256
292
326
360
394
430
464
498
Confirm
Ion
190
224
258
290
324
362
396
428
466
500
Internal Standard (IS)
Chrysene-d12 240
Phenanthrene-d10
Surrogate Compound
13C6-gamma-BHC 187
«c12-4,4' -DDT 247
1 Ratio of quantitacion ion
Expected
Ratio3
3.0
July, 1991
Page D - 68/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-8
CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR SURROGATE AND INTERN/
Classification
Surrogates
Phenol-ds
2 -Fluorophenol
2,4,6-TribromophenoL
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
p-Terphenyl-du
Internal Standards
1,4- Dichlorobenzene -d<,
Naphthalene-da
Acenaphthene-d10
Phenanthrene-d10
Chrysene-d12
Perylene-d12
Primary Ion
Secondary
Page D - 69/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-9
CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR TARGET COMPOJE
OF PAHs, PCBs, and PESTICIDES,
Pr imarv I*
152
153
159
166
170
173
178
178
181
225
257
296, 291
330
364, 361
392, 400
434, 431
494, 504
Compound
PCS congeners8
2-Cl1-PCB(l)
2,3-Cl2-PCB (5)
2,4,5-Cl3-PCB (29)
2,2',4,6-Cl4-PCB (50)
2,2'3,4,5'-Cls-PCB (87)
2,2',4,4',5,6'-Cl6-PCB (154)
2,2',3,4',5,6,6'-CL7-PCB (188)
2,2',3,3'4,5',6,6'-CLg-PCB (200)
2,2'3,3',4,4',5,5',6,6' -C110-PCB (209)
Pesticide Analvtes
2.4-D
aldrin
endrin aldehyde
Captan
heptachlor
DDVP
trans-nonachlor
Propoxur
Oxychlordane
121
Resmethrin
81
Ronne1
Naphthalene
Diazinon
Dicofol
140
Carbaryl
Bendiocarb
51
Acenaphth
Acenaph
Toxaph
Fluor
1-Pheny
Malathion
Anthracene
Phenanthrene
beta-BHC
, 45, 85, 175, 220
263, 220
345, 250
119, 117, 77, 149
272, 274
79, 185, 187, 202
98, 85, 73, 65
111, 41, 43, 81
57, 87, 117, 149,
128, 143, 141, 171,
119, 93, 79, 57, 62
129, 127
179, 199, 93, 97
111, 141, 250, 75,
115, 116, 146
126, 166, 223, 58,
151,.153
152, 154
231, 233
165, 167
169, 168, 141, 115
125, 127, 158, 172
179. 176
179, 176
183, 109
July, T991
Page D - /U/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-9
CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR TARGET COMPO
OF PAHs, PCBs, and PESTICIDES
alpha-BHC
alpha-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
cis-Permethrin
trans-Permethrin
endosulfan I
Chlorpyrifos
Atrazine
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
methoxychlor
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
4,4'-ODD
4,4'-DDT
4,4'-DDE
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Folpet
76
dieldrin
endrin
Chlorothalonil
133
Pentachlorophenol
endosulfan sulfate
Benzo(g,h.i)peryle
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)p
D-ibenzo (a . h) anthra
Hexachlorobenzene
Dacthal
endrin ketone
endosulfan I
hepcachlor /epo
chlordane/(aLp'ha and/or
Congener/
339, 341
97, 199, 125, 258
58, 202, 215, 173,
101, 100
101, 100
228
229, 226
226, 229
37, 165
2>7, 165
48, 176
253, 125
253, 125
253, 125
262, 130, 117, 104,
82, 81
82, 81
264, 268, 109, 124,
264, 268
387, 422
138, 277
138, 227
139, 279
142, 249
45, 44, 142, 221
67, 319
339, 341
355, 351
375, 377
July,
Page D - 7I/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/SV-10
KNOWN RELATIVE ABUNDANCES OF IONS IN PCB MOLEC
m/z
Relative
Intensity
Monochlorobiphenyls
188 100
189 13.5
190 33.4
192 4.41
Dichlorobiphenyls
222 100
223 13.5
224 66.0
225 . 8.82
226 11.2
227 1.44
Trichlorobiphenyls
256 100
257 13.5
258 98.6
259 13.2
260 32.7
261 4.31
262 3.73
263 0.47
Tetrachlorobiphenyls
290 76.2
291 10.3 •
292 100
293 13.4
294 49.4
295 6.57
296 11.0
297 1.43
298 0.9X
m/z
Relative
Intensity
8.78
Relative
Intensity
324
325
326
327
328
Hepta-chlorofedphenyls
392\
393
^394
3V
W6
397
3)58
399
400
401
402
. A3
^ 5
100
13
98
13
53
-•
17
2
3
.7
.91
.5
.3
.2
.8
.16
.7
.34
.52
Octachlorobiphenyls
33.4
4.51
87.3
11.8
100
13.4
65.6
8.76
26.9
3.57
7.10
0.93
1.18
0.15
0.11
Nonachlorobiphenyls
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
26.0
3.51
76.4
76.4
100
13.4
76.4
10.2
37.6
5.00
12.4
1.63
2.72
0.35
0.39
July, L991
Page D - 72,/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
m/z
Relative
Intensity
Decachlorobiphenyl
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
20.8
2.81
68.0
9.17
100
13.4
87.3
11.7
50.0
6.67
19.7
2.61
5.40
0.71
1.02
0.13
July,
Page D - 73/SV
-------
Exhibit D
Figure D/SV-1.. Sampling Hea
Protective Cap
SOW No. XX3T- Ambient Air
PAHs,PCB/'s and Pesticides
Protective
Cap
105mm
Quartz Fiber
Filter and
Support
Air Flow
Exhaust
'articulate
Filter
Support
Absorbant
Cartridge and
Support
Glass Cartridge
Adsorbent
(PUF/XAD-2/PUF)
Retaining Screen
Silicone
Gasket
Adsorbent
Support
July, 1991
Page D - /4/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Figure D/SV-2. Dual Adsorbent Trap for Sampling PAHs,
, and Pesticides
65mm x 125mm
GLASS
CYLINDER
'e"o°o o o oo o o oWo
"
50mm PUF
Plug
Sorbent Bed
Support
Screens
• 25mm PUF
Plug
July, iyyi
Page D - 75/SV
-------
Exhibit D
Air Flow
*
105 mm
. XXX - Ambient Air
Fifeure D/SV-3. Analytical Sch<
riner riuer
of PAHs/ PGfes and Pesticides.
Surrogate
Std's Added
culate
Pilfer
pport
Adso/be
Cartridog and
po
(PUF AXAD -2 / PUF)
Air Flow
Exhaust
hyl Ether/Hexane
Silica Gel Column
Clean-op
Screening by
c AECD / FID
Internal
Standard
Nitrogen Slowdown
Hydr«carbo>is (PAH *s)
HRGC/HRMS
• Detection Limits:
ng Qn-Column
•\Detection Limits:
Ona On-Column
•DB-;
• Detection Limits:
SOng On-Column
• DB-5 Column
July, 1991
Page D - /o/av
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
KudeiW-I
Filter
Surrogate Standard
Addition
Hexane Rinse
Figure D/SV-4. Soxhiet Extraction Followed Bv Kuderna7-Danish (K-D)
Evaporator.
Adsorben^
PUF/XAD-3/PUF
Soxhiet Extraction wi
Diethyl Ether/ Hexana(1:9
v/v) (18 Hours/3 Cycjes/tjfj
Vblume Adjusted \
U^OmL \/
Concentrated to 1 ml_
with^Nitrogen Slowdown
Internal \
Standard AdoWony
(optional)
vaporatoKAttacrje wi
r
Hexane Rinse
raterBathat50°C
Internal
Standard Addition
July, 1991
Page D - ///SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
XV.
. Figure D/SV-5
Optional GC/ECD/FID Screening of
PUF/XAD-2 Adsorbent Cartridge.
ted Filter and
Can
Recorder
And
Integrator
July.
page D -
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
=nteY PIU5 PUF/XAD-2
Figure
nf. an /XfO CtrtofH
Soxhlet
Extraction
Kuderna- /
Danish (K-D) Concentrator
InitiahCalipration
Using WiltPPoint
Calibration Standards
-Relative Response
\Factors (RRF)
-Systems Performance
Check Compounds
Routine
Calibration
-Continuous Calibration
Check (CCC)
July, 1991
Page D - 79/SV
-------
Exhibit
D Ion Abundance
Criteria to Maat PFTP-g
GCJMS
Performance
Tuning and Mass
Calibration to DFTPP
Specifications
Figu
Mass Assignment
and ion Abundance
Criteria Demonstrated
Each 12-Hours
Initial Calibration At
Five Concentration
Levels of Each Analyte
and Internal Standard
Calculated Relative
Retention Time (RRT)
and Mean RRT for Each
Analyte and Internal
Standard
Initial CaliBrationFor
Each Analyte ah€l_a!l
Internal/Surrogate
Standards
Calculate Relative
Response Factor (RRF)
For each Compound At
Each Concentration Level
System Performance
Check Compounds (CCC)
Sample Component Relative
Time (RT) Must Compai
Within 0.06 RRT of Statfda
Compound
Standard
Compare RF For Eac
Fron/l2-«our Stan<
InitiarGaJib
Accepta
.j^Verify Acceptability For
nimum, Maximum % RSD
and Max. % Diff. For Each
Analyte
Comparison of Sample
Mass Spectra to Standard
• Ion Mass
• Ion Intensity
• IS area
Calculation of
Concentration ^
Utilizing RRFs
For TCLs and TICs
Calculation of:
Surrogate Recovery
Internal Std ARC and
RTS
Continuing Calibration
Continuing Calibration Check
(CCC) must be analyzed Each
12-Hour Period
July, 1991
Page D - 80/SV
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Figure D/£ 7
Prepare Calibration Standards
7
Internal Standards
Having Simflar Behavior
to Compounds of
Interest Normally
Deuterated PAHs
TuneGC/MStoDFTPFy
Specifications /
Internal Standard
±
Calibration Tecrdo^
Standard
(OpUona/)
Prepare Calibration
Standards
Add Internal Standards to
Calibration Standards and
Sample Extract
Inject Clatoratran Standards:
Calculate Response
Factor (RRF)
Verify Working Calbration
Curve or RF Each Day
Calibration
^StandarBsforEach
ofmterest
f
Inject Calibration Standard:
Prepare Calibration Curve or
Response Factor (RF)
Verify Working Calbration
~> Curve or RF Each Day
Concentrate Extract
and Reanalyze^
Introduce ExtractJttto
/MSDirechniecOon
v
Does^esponse^xceed
/Linear Rdnge ats vstem?
Does Response Fall Below
Method Detection Limits?
Yes,
Dilute Extract
and Reanalyze
Calculate Concentration o<
Anaryte, Using
Cafe ration Curves
ation(
T
GC / MS Performance Test
12-Hr Continuing
Calibration Check
System Performance
Check
July, L991
Page D -
-------
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR
OF IKt5RGANiC\COMPOUND£
SRS AND
3UPJ
EMI '
'ETERMINATION
COLLECTED ON
.YZEJD BY
) ATOMIC
FURNACE
CTROMETRY
-------
SECTION 4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION
OF INORGANIC COMPOUNDS COLLECTED ON
HI-VOL FILTERS AND ANALYZED BY
INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) ATOMIC
EMISSION SPECTROMETRY OR GRAPHITE
FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION (GFAA) SPE^TROMETi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION /../... ./^ D - I/IN
SAMPLE PREPARATION BY MICROWAVE EXT
AND RELATED HANDLING PROCEDURES -^X^ • ^\/ / D - 2/IN
SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY ICP -^X -^\ D 8/IN
ALTERNATE SAMPLE PREPARATION/FOR GFAA-At}ALYSIS . . .>*/. . . . D -36/IN
SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY GFAA . \ \^^77. ^_ . / D -38/IN
BIBLIOGRAPHY \ .V ./. D -60/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 4
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR THE DETERMI
OF INORGANIC COMPOUNDS COLLECTED,
HI-VOL FILTERS AND ANALYZED
INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP
EMISSION SPECTROMETRY OR G
FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION (GFAA) <§PECTROMETRY
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.1.1 Scope and Application
4.1.1.1 The methods specified in ExhL&it/D must #e
documented instrument or method deteoriof
Required Quantitation Limits (Exhibit
detection limits may be used only if the
five times the documented detection limit
.imits/
ed and the
t meet the Contract
al methods with higher
jpple concentration exceeds
rument or method.
ftie
ie ins
4.1.1.2 All samples must initially be run undilutecl\(i.e
of the sample preparation procedure^":—Whejian analyte
exceeds the calibrated or linear -tajige (as app?Op-eia£eJ
that analyte(s) is required afoer smpropYiraite dilution,
final product
icentration
reanalysis for
The Contractor
must use the least dilution nece!
valid analytical range (but not
valid value for each analyte as measured
analyses. Unless the Contractor can
required to obtain valixi—results, bothx
measurements must be/containeoxin
shall be made with dieio/fize~ik waiser appropi
constant acid strejagtt
raptor is remi
ilyte(s) within the
and report the highest
bm the undiluted and diluted
proof that dilution was
and undiluted sample
All sample dilutions
Ly acidified to maintain
quired and
4.1.1.3 The Con,
compendium of
performance of
assurance/quality
association with these"
or
ioned that Exhibit D is a
ifitted analytical methods to be used in the
er/this contract. The quality
procedures or measurements to be performed in
or analyses are specified in Exhibit E.
is relttinded
nd cautioned that the collection and
be referred to within the individual
Quality Assurance Protocol of Exhibit E. The
ments are specified in Exhibit B. Raw data
ciation with the performance of analyses
brm to the appropriate provisions of
July, 1991
Page D-l/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW
Ambii
4.1.1.5 Lab "gl-assware to be used in metals analyst
according to EPA's manual "Methods for Chemical A:
Wastes" or an equivalent procedure (see part 4.6)
opened and digested in a hood. Stock solutions
instrument or method calibration standards may
as described in part 4.6. All other solutions/to
Assurance/Quality Control measurements shall
requirements of Exhibit E.
ft be acid cleaned
of Water and
Les must be
r preparing
repared
red /for all
4.1.1.6 Background corrections are requi
Each GFAA analysis requires a minimum of/two' inject
during full Method of Standard Addition/ (MSAs)
shall require a minimum of two replicate Exposure/
Appropriate hard copy raw data for eabh expbsure/in
included in the data package in accordanc^witn^Ex}
of each set of exposures/injections shall be"'
sample analysis, and reporting as specified in
must be reported in the raw data in concentration
'AA measurements.
(burns) except
!CP measurements
except for full MSA.
ection shall be
'ibit B. The average
standardization,
All exposures
4.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION BY MICROWA'
PROCEDURES
4.2.1 Introdtict ion
4.2.1.1 This Section describes a mic^
extract the inorganics from the
Following microwave ex/cractior
GFAA.
TED
DLING
extraction procedure to
loaded glass-fiber filter.
ly\es are analyzed by ICP or
4.2.2 Sample Preservat}
4.2.2.1 Ambient/ai
half lengthwise<(witli
protective envelo
to 30°C until analyst
4.2.2.2 Th
days. To/b'e
samples
data s
4.2.3 S
4.2.37
the Feder>
11.) The ino
hydrochloric aci
uld be received folded in
material inward and enclosed in
rotective envelopes shall be stored at 15
under this contract is 180
thi^xconcract, the Contractor must analyze
if these times are less than the maximum
in this contract.
it from the 8" x 10" filter as described in
for lead (see Figure D/IN-1 and Reference
:racted from the filter strip by a
solution using a laboratory microwave
July, 1991
Page D-2/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambient Ai;
' digestion system. After cooling, the digestate is centr^fuged to remove
any insoluble material-.
4.2.3.2 Microwave extraction is used to prepare ^amp^es for ICP. This
method (using nitric acid only) or an alternate *iot^extrke±ion technique
(see part 4.4) may be used to prepare samples
4.2.4 Apparatus and Materials
4.2.4.1 Microwave digestive system and caj
programmable power settings up to 600 wat
station: With
fsee Figure D/IN-2).
NOTE: Commercial kitchen or home-use micr/wave sh
digestion of samples under this contract./ The
corrosion resistant and well ventilated.
protected against corrosion for safe op-ejatiot
be used for the
favity must be
ct/onics must be
in
4.2.4.2 PFA Teflon digestion vessels: Capable of
of up to 100 psi. Pressure venting vessels capat
pressure relief at pressures Breeding 100 psi. (6(K
4.2.4.7 Centri
polypropylene,
4.2.4.3 Teflon PFA overflow
capacity).
4.2.4.4 Rotating table: For unif
oven.
4.2.4.5 Volumetric gl
borosilicate).
4.2.4.6 Bottles
caps, for storin
standards (500-
^standing pressures
atrolled
-mL capacity).
- to 120-mL
t
e of samples within the
capacity (Class A
/propylene with leakproof
r storing multielement
50
Lypropylene tube with screw tops of
3119-0050 or equivalent).
.utomat
equiva
with an accuracy of setting of
20 p.L (Grumman Automatic Dispensing
14-793-1) or polypropylene (Fisher 14-8090),
luring shaking.
No. 8500): To be worn while cutting and
July, 1991
Page D-3/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOU No/^XXX - Ambient Air
.4.2.4.11 Centrifuge: Capable of maintaining spe
(International'Equipment company Model UV or equiv,
4.2.4.12 Template: To aid in sectioning the
Federal Register 1978 43 (Oct. 5), 46258-46261.
f 2000 rpm
Pizza cutter: Thin wheel (< 1
Mechanical shaker: Eberbach C
4.2.4.13
4.2.4.14
equivalent.
4.2.5 Reagents
4.2.5.1 Hydrochloric acid: American^hem
grade, concentrated (12.3 M) (or equiva
4.2.5.2 Nitric acid: Redistilled spectrograp'
eqivalent), for preparing samples.
4.2.5.3 ASTM Type II water (
4.2.6 Microwave Extraction Procedurex
4.2.6.1 Microwave Calibration ProcN
(ACS) reagent
reparing samples.
4.2.6.1.1 Calibration of the micro
to its use. In orderxcfiat^absolute
from one microwave unit^tp^ another, the
determined.
tnit is a critical step prior
.ettings may be interchanged
ctu$l delivered power must be
4.2.6.1.2 Calitfratdon of a/lab»3fa^ory"Jirir&rowave unit (see Figure D/IN-
2) depends on the type of eAectfronic^s^stem used by the manufacturer.
If the unit has a precise/and/accurate linear relationship between the
output power amkthe s«^4 used in controlling the microwave unit, then
the calibration cahxbe a single-point calibration at maximum power. If
the unit is not accurate or precise for some portion of the controlling
scale, ther^-a—nrottiple-point calibration is necessary. If the unit
power calibration neetis multiple-point calibration, then the point where
the linearLty^be~gTms muss be identified. For example: a calibration at
100, W, 9^, 97, 95,^0, SO, 70, 60, and 50 percent power settings can
be applied and the dataNolo\ted. The nonlinear portion of the
uded or restricted in use. Each percent is
.5 - 6.5 W and becomes the smallest unit of
If 20 - 40 W are contained from 99 - 100
microwave calibration is not controllable
of the linear portion of the control scale
'ion of precise power conditions specified in
scale.
July, 1991
Page D-4/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.2.6.1.3 . The equations in the following paragraph7 evaluate the power
available for heating in a microwave cavity. This/isAccomplished by
measuring .the temperature rise in 1 kg of water eKpoped to
electromagnetic radiation for a fixed period of/cimeC Measurements are
made on weighed replicates (five replicates) of/1 kg samples of room
temperature distilled water in thick-walled mi^
(Teflon) vessels. The containers must be circulated conxMea;gure the final
temperature of the water, af^rs£iTriBg^__(Tf) , to withi!n 0.1°C, while
stirring the water (an electtronie^atirrer using-^a—Large stir bar works
best) within 30 seconds of the. end ofT~TrTadiation. IJse the maximum
reading. Repeat for a new sample ,^for a/topalof~~f-tve replicates per
microwave setting, of distilled roomXterapetfature water using a new,
clean container. Calculate the miarowave/power according to the
formula:
^ ~~^ - - \. ^
Eq. D/IN-1
Eq. D/IN-2
Eq. D/IN-3
,87 xT
whe/e
,t power absorbed by the sample in watts (W =
ion factor for thermochemical calories-sec"1
to 4.184);
apacity, thermal capacity, or specific heat
= 1.0 for water) ;
July, 1991
Page D-5/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW Ntfxjtxx - Ambient Air
M
T
t
The mass of the sample in grams;
Tf --T! in °C; and
Time in seconds.
4.2.6.2.2 Derive an equation for the linear/port ion~xif the\calibration
range and determine the equivalent value inX/at^s of the^arbitrJ
setting scale. Use the actual power in waw^vM determined
appropriate setting of the particular microwave unit being used>\Eac
microwave unit will have its own setting/that corresponds to the actual
power delivered to the samples.
4.2.6.3 Cleaning Procedure for PFA Veaseli
4.2.6.3.1 Prior to first use, new^yesse1
are used. A pre treatment/cleaning
procedure calls for heating the vessels to*: 96
vessels must be disassembled during annealin
(the top of the vessel or the rim) must not be
vessel during annealing.
nd
annealed before they
be followed. This
yrs to 200"C. The
sealing surfaces
id to ^support the
4.2.6.3.2 Rinse with disti
1:1 HC1 for a minimum of thre^
reached a temperature just belo'
Immerse in a cleaning bath of l:i\HNi
after the bath temperature has reached"a
The vessels are then rinsed with copious
water prior to use fpr"~any~
digestions, the PFA/vesJ5fiJLs snpuld be
rinsed followed b
Immerse
4.2.6.4 Digestion Procedure .for
tilled
cpwave
cleaning bath of
temperature has
distilled water.
or/a minimum of three hours
emperature just below boiling.
ounts of deionized, distilled
s contract. Between sample
nt washed and 1:1 HN03
rinse.
ctraction
4.2.6.4.1 P^epafexextra/ting acid (2.06 M HC1, 0.89 M HN03) for use
with ICP analysis- Ihva/l-I: volumetric flask, combine in order and mix
well 500 mL of deibnlzed, <(istilled water, 55.5 mL of concentrated (16
M) redistilled spectro^raphicxgrade nitric acid, and 167.5 mL of ACS
reagent-gr>dB~~corieem:rateoXiwdr
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.2.6.4.3 . Cut a 1" x 8" strip from the folded partficuAate bearing
filter using "a template and a pizza cutter as desc/ibe4 in the Federal
Reference .Method for Lead (see Figure D/IN-1 and/Reference 11). Using
vinyl gloves or plastic forceps, accordion-fold^or tightly roll the
filter strip and place it on its edge in a cenj
NOTE: A breathing mask and vinyl gloves are/
personnel handling dry glass-fiber filters.
the inhalation of minute glass shards and
gloves protect the skin from the same mab^ri^ls and also prevent
contamination of the sample by skin secyetipns.
NOTE: It is suggested that more than
extracted to ensure adequate sample
analysis.
strip from
!olume for s-amr
filter be
e and QC sample
[The
4.2.6.4.4 Add 10.0 mL of extracting ac^id for
3 M nitric acid for GFAA analysis, using ap
-------
Exhibit D
SOW NOX--OCXX - Ambient Air
• bottom of the tube. The matrix is 0.45 M nitric aotd,/1.03 M
hydrochloric acid for .ICP analysis or 1.5 M nitric/acid, for GFAA
analysis and deionized, distilled water. The sample T^ now ready for
analysis.
4.3 SAMPLE ANALYSIS BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA
SPECTROMETRY
4.3.1 Introduction
4.3.1.1 Inorganic analytes listed in Tal
List in Exhibit C are determined by ICP
microwave digestion. Appropriate step
potential interference effects.
4.3.1.2 Table D/IN-2 lists analytes along
and typical estimated instrumental detection
pneumatic nebulization. Actual working detection
dependent and as the sample matiriX-varies, these
vary. In time, other analytes/may
available.
he Target Analyte
eparation by
to correct for
4.3.1.3 Because of the differenc
satisfactory instruments, no detail
can be provided. Instead, the analy
provided by the manufacturer of the
4.3.2 Summary of Method
4.3.2.1 The analyt^ concentrations
spectroscopic ana
nebulizer. The ^era/sol formed i4 tran
plasma and the
and ionic line
are produced when tfifexelectrc
The spectra are disperse^by a
line radiations) -aiLe monit
photomultiplTier tube(s>^ The
amended wavelengths
conventional
e sample
rations may also
tion becomes
and models of
fental operating instructions
to the instructions
instrument.
als^are excited into
photomul
concentzrat
specific
system a'
ned by ICP atomic emission
e pumped into a. pneumatic
d into an inductively coupled
.er electronic states. Atomic
4 characteristic of the particular metals
decay back to the lower energy levels.
ectrometer and the intensity of specific
Itaneously or sequentially by a
rrent produced by the
n direct proportion to the
in the sample within the linear range of a
hotocurrent is processed by a computer
tation through a calibration procedure.
>tocv
4.3.
series o
the acid
calibration sta
matched to the samp
pe/foi/med by standardizing the instrument with a
:andards and a blank that are matrix matched to
Every solution analyzed, such as a dilution,
ity "Vtandard, or reference sample must be matrix
act.
July, 1991
Page D-8/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOU No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.3.2.3 Appropriate steps must be taken to ensure th/t potential
interferences 'are corrected. This is especially imnort^mt for spectral
interferences. Recommendations for correcting for /Interferences are
briefly summarized below under headings that categori£e^ the type of
interference that is being considered.
4.3.2.3.1 Recommended Corrections for Phys
t
• The use of peristaltic pump to introduo^
nebulizer.
• Frequent (20 percent or better) an,
stability standard.
• Adequate rinsing (one minute
10 percent HN03 or 10 percent
argon or a nebulizer tip washer as n
4.3.2.3.2 Recommended Corrections for Chemica
ample analyses using
use of humidified
Optionally ,/wa
wavelengths)
calibratioTkblar?
performed.
4.3.2.4 Even
• Matrix matching between
diluting the sample duri
4.3.2.3.3 Recommended Corrections^or Spei
id sample
•ferences
Use of calculated interelement\cor
first or second order equations
function (on-peak^oeri?e£tion).
Optional use o
both sides of/th<
ons in the form of factors or
'describe the interference
shift on either side or
correction).
Lution,
Scarfs (fb-j^eacb/of the analyte element
>f /he samples-^simultaneously plotted with a
and a calibration standard scan may be
calibration standards, calibration and
method blanks, and reference ^*amples>, must be analyzed using two full
exposure^ (pe-ak~ST&an) , e^ch of whie/i is sufficient to meet the method
detection lamit for e^ch analyte emission line. All exposure times must
be the/same for all analysesXand all quarterly analyses (i.e., method
detec/tioj?l limit and intere,lera\ent correction factor.)
4.3>2X5 B>th the off-peaV
correcrton cc^&ficients
all analyte^ must~^b_e ca^cuJ
(b/kckground) and on-peak (interelement
equations) interference corrections made for
ted and reported with the analysis results.
July, 1991
Page D-9/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW Noc-OCXX - Ambient Air
'4.3.2.6 If the sum of the values of the interferenq
on any analyte is greater than the resulting analy
reported value is to be flagged with an "I" on FQ
/rrection(s) made
the
UN.
4.3.2.7 If the analyte requiring dilution inte
analyte, the interference corrections) must r/fl
concentration of the interferent in the undi
4.3.2.8 The specific spectral lines that
4.3.2.9 All reported analyte data must
linear range of the respective analyte
concentration results in the linear
exceeded, the sample must be diluted
concentration falls within the linear rl
4.3.3 Safety
4.3.3.1 The toxicity or carcinj;
method has not been precisely
should be treated as a potential
responsible for maintaining a ci
regarding the safe handling of
reference file of material handlihg\dat
personnel involved in the chemical afialy*
4.3.4 Interferences
4.3.4.1 ICP emissi
which in practice
cause a translati
overlap or increase
recombination cpnti
For a given matri:
produced that is
interference of the ana
in sensitivi
icity of each reag
imployed must be repor
.ed within the
If any analyte
ral line being
•esulting solution
t below the CRQL.
ed in this
cal compound
oratory is
OSHA regulations
in this method. A
:he/ts shall be available to all
/interelement effects,
''forms. Interferences that
ire caused by spectral line
'electron/metal ion
light within the spectrometer.
line, a constant additive interference is
(of the analyte concentration. Rotational
lurve, experienced essentially as a change
combined effects of variations in nebulizer
performance produced byxthe phys4cal/properties of the sample solution
and changes ifithefexcitacion conditions in the plasma caused by the
matrix inetads. Both forms of interference can operate simultaneously for
a par^Lcu^ar sample matrij
4.3 A.2 ^S^ectral interference! from poorly resolved metal spectral lines,
such aascaCEered light, o/r byroad continuum spectral background, will
lead to systematic error An ,the analytical results unless proper
corrections a^e made^ hjtolecular band emission will lead to a
deterioration of^v^he de'teccion limit and will increase the difficulty of
off-peak backgroun^correetion. Methods of correcting translational
July, 1991
Page D-10/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
interference (.other than exact matrix matching of
sample) include the on-peak correction technique.
applied to both spectral line overlap and backgrou
requires specific knowledge of the metals causin
peak correction can only be performed on a quan
interfering metals are included in the multi-m-
uncertainties may still exist in whether the
employed match those required for the particu'
th
nterference.
andards to the
'method can be
:ihancement, but it
On-
if the
Although
ents
4.3.4.3 Rotational calibration curve intezTepence manifests itself^f^r a
given matrix and spectral line as a. chang/6 ii/the slope of the analyte
calibration. This type of interference -Include: sanipie nebulization and
transport effects, often called physical i/terfere/ce/Including lateral
diffusion interferences; and chemical /int/rferenc/s ^uch as solute
vaporization interference and ioniza^ion ic^terferencfes. Such
interferences can be reduced by matrix^-matchin^' of/the standards and
samples and by the method of standard add£t4.pns, ^although standard
additions can become quite lengthy and impra^t^cablexfor multi-metal
analyses) and by the use of internal standards /NCatrixNuatching can
correct for any of these interferences but the corre^ion/is dependent on
the accuracy of the matching. /Vartaetw«_an^the matrix^from sample to
sample will cause corresponding i^ac£uraciesT!rr~the--analyte results.
4.3.4.4 Listed in Table D/IN-3 \re\ome i/tei^ference^effects for the
recommended wavelengths given in Table\p/^LN-/. The data in Table D/IN-3
are intended for use only as a rudimentary/guide for the indication of
potential spectral interferences. Fo\thite purpose, linear relations
between concentration aad~±n
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No^xXXX - Ambient A:
regression
:al interference
of creating
ler
net
and on-peak (coefficients of first or second o
equations' describing expected interference) s
corrections. In addition, the software mus
a hard copy output of both types of correc
concentration units or analyte raw intensi
calculated concentrations .
4.3.5.2 Argon gas supply: Welding grade or/be
4.3.5.3 Assorted laboratory volumetric glassware, pipets and
micropipets .
4.3.5.4 Operating conditions: Becauae" of the differences among various
makes and models of satisfactory insG^umenfcsu no/detteiled operating
instructions can be provided. Instead/^the anWys/ should follow the
instructions provided by the manufacturer di^the particular instrument.
Sensitivity, instrumental detection limit, prechvdroch4^ric acid, ASTM Type I water, 1:1 nitric
acid, and A§JJf-Typft-^I watei
NOTE: CKromic ac fo>sha 1 iNno t be u~s4d because chromium is one of the
contrac/t required analyses ,\and its use may lead to cross contamination.
NOTE/ A/ids used in the pVepkration of standards and for sample
pro«^essiftgmust be below t|xe fRQLs for the analytes of interest for the
SOW.
4.3.6.2 Nitr-ic aci'dxa.nd/ hy/irochloric acid used in the preparation of
standards and tb^sample processing must be of high purity.
July, 1991
Page D-12/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.3.6.3 Water equivalent to ASTM Type II is used thr/ugbfout.
4.3.6.4 Stock standard solutions: Standards must/be /rom ultrapure
materials. The stock standard solutions may be tb4 same as the spiking
standard solutions, if desired.
4.3.6.5 Spiking standard solutions: Standarc
ultrapure materials. Both multi-metal and
needed. Because of the limited sample voli
solutions will be needed to maintain the s«
original strength after the addition of t}
mi/st be Tfeade frl
metal
.00 mL) , multi-rffetal
matrix at 95 percei
ike volume.
J.1 be
4.3.6.6 No more than five multi-metal/stock stan<;
containing metals in the following concentrations,
will be required
Na, Al, Ca, As, Se
Ba, Co, Mn, Ni, Pb, Ag, Tl, V, K
Be, Cd, Cu, Cr, Zn, Sb,/JSn, Mo, Fe, Mg
4.3.6.6.1 Using the appro
following standards have
Metals Mixes
Al, Ba, Be, Fe, Ni, Ag, Na, Tl
Ca, Cd, Co, Cu, Pb
Cr
V
Zoncy. mg/L
4.3.6.7 A single/me
each metal.
500
lution matrices, the
foryone year.
20 percent cone. HC1
10 percent cone. HN03
Water
2 percent cone. HN03
00 mg/L will be needed for
4.3.6.8 Calibration >fcand/rds/: Prepare calibration standards by
dilution of stock os^spiKlng/standard solutions. All calibration
standards must be matr^matehed with the extracting acid solution
according to£he__p^pearati^n procedure used in the analysis.
Concentrate^ hydrochlo
-------
Exhibit D
sow
- Ambient Air
patched with the extracting acid solution according
procedure used in the analysis with the following
given concentrations:
Metals
Na, Al, Ca, Fe, Mg
. Ba, Co, Mn, Ni, Pb, Ag, V, Tl
Be, Cd, Cu, Cr, Zn
ie preparation
Ks present at the
ffefent
The yhffaial calibration
soutce/than that used for
oximate/ly in the middle of the
ion/standard must be in the
4.3-6.11 Initial calibration verifica,
verification solution shall be from a di
the calibration standards and shall be/ap
respective calibration curve. This verifier
same acid matrix as the calibration standards?
4.3.6.12 ICP interference check sample: Prepare By-^dilution of the
stock standards if it is not available from the EP?^ If^she solution is
prepared by the analyst, it shati-be_jnade using the cbn^entzrations in
Table D/IN-4. It shall be run/at least~~trv»~_times and tne mean standard
deviation shall be reported in\the^
NOTE: The interference check solution/s)
known concentrations of interferingX^lei
magnitude of interferences and provi<
corrections. The ICS is used to verif^
corrected by the data sys"tenT~w4;thi-n qual\ty
4.3.7. Quality Control
4.3.7.1 Instrume
4.3.7.1.1
Prior to the an.
shall be initially ca
4.3.7.1.
is prepared to contain
that will demonstrate the
'equate test of any
the interference levels are
pntrol limits.
samples and required QC, each ICP system
to determine instrument sensitivity.
ibrated daily or once every 24 hours and
set up.
Cal?
matrix an
following
sKall be prepared using the same type of
icentration as the preparation blank
tion.
July, 199L
Page D-14/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambient: A
Calibrate according to instrument manufacturer';
procedures using at least two standards, one being
Before beginning the sample run, reanalyze the
calibration standard as if it were a sample.
4.3.7.1.4 Calculations
ommended
lank.
% Recovery = Found C°ncentrat
True Concentration
4.3.7.1.5 Technical Acceptance Crite
Recovery for the highest mixed
± five percent of the true value
4.3.7.1.6 Corrective Action
(dard shall be within
rcent)
The instrument
raw data. The fin
Immediate
of the initial^Valibr
analyte by-the ana
Solution(s) CECV)
4.3.7.2/2'
Follow instrument manufacturer's recommendations to"borrect the
problem. Also, baseline cofffec-trioiu_isaccep table asX^ng as it is
performed after every samp](e orafter^h^~c4mtiouing calibration
verification and blank check: rVsTop-rng^is acceptable as long as it is
immediately preceded and immeHjat^ly fol/Loy£dr-by-~a^CCV and a CCB.
4.3.7.1.7 Documentation
iized data \nd\ime shall be included in the
concentration sh6uld\be in
4.3.7.2 Initial Ca/ibjr4tion yer
4.3.7.2.1 S
system has been calibrated, the accuracy
shall be verified and documented for every
,EPA Initial Calibration Verification
.ength used for analysis.
vt is calibrated, the ICV shall be run
:alibration, before any samples are
July, 1991
Page D-15/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW Nox-xXXX - Ambient Air
, 4.3.7.2.3 Procedure
If the. ICV solution(s) are not available fron/EPA^xor where a
certified solution of an analyte is not availayie-^roma^jy source,
analyses shall be conducted on an independent/sta4da~l?dat
concentration other than that used for instrument calib>a£ion>^ut
within the linear range. An independent st£H4ard is define*
standard composed of the analytes from a different source than^-those}
used in the standards for the instrument/caVlbration.
4.3.7.2.4 Calculations
% Recovery =
Found Concentration
True Concentration
LOO/
Eq. D/IN-5
4.3.7.2.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
Recovery for the ICV shall/4ie^within ± 10 percentSxpf ylfhe true value
(i.e., 90-110 percent).
4.3.7.2.6 Corrective Action
When recoveries of the ICV exch;
the analysis shall be terminated,
instrument recalibrated, and the ca}
4.3.7.2.7 Documentation
Report the 1C
(Mg/L), and
4.3.7.3 Contin<
4.3.7.3.1 Summary
chnical acceptance criteria,
i corrected, the
ion reverified.
true concentration
To ensu,
calibra
every
4.3.
during an analysis run, a continuing
ion"XCCV) is analyzed and reported for
the ahalysis of each analyte.
.ency of 10 percent or every two hours
hever is more frequent.
the last analytical sample in the analysis
July, 1991
Page D-16/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.3.7.3.3 Procedure
The same CCV shall be used throughout the ana
of samples received. The analyte concentratio
calibration standard shall be an EPA solution
standard solution and should be at or near ±
range levels of the calibration curve.
runs for a Case
the continuing
r a Contactor prepared
ient oC. the mid-
Each CCV analyzed shall reflect the co
of the associated analytical samples (t
samples or the preceding analytical s
The duration of analysis, rinses and
affect the CCV measured result shall Act/be
greater extent than the extent applied/to the
samples. For instance, the differencexin tim<
and the blank immediately followin,
time between the CCV and the analyticaixsample
it shall not exceed the smallest differen<
consecutive analytical samples associated withxthe
4.3.7.3.4 Calculations
% Recovery
ions of analysis^xfor
eceding 10 analytical
up to the previous CCV).
relate^Nqperations that may
ed/to the CCV to a
iated analytical
:ween a CCV analysis
the difference in
mmediately preceding
between any two
When recovy
the analysis^halT
recalibrated, t
analytical" samples
Last complijji£__CCV
4 . 3 . 7 . 3/
Eq. D/IN-6
4.3.7.3.5 Technical Acceptance Crio^ria<
Recovery for the/CCV sha^ be withi^ ± \0 percent of the true value
(i.e., 90-110 per/en
4.3.7.3.6 Corre,
technical acceptance criteria,
I, the problem corrected, the instrument
reverified, and the preceding 10
(or all analytical samples since the
:centration (ng/L), true concentration
y on FORM II-AAIN.
July, 1991
Page D-17/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW N/>XXX - Ambient Air
'4.3.7.4 CRQL Standard
4.3.7.4.1- Summary
To verify linearity near the CRQL, the Co/tr«=
ICP standard at two times the IDL or two td
greater. This standard shall be run for
analysis.
4.3.7.4.2 Frequency
The CRQL standard shall be run at/
sample analysis run, or a minimum
is more frequent.
4.3.7.4.3 Procedure
The CRQL standard shall not be run before
4.3.7.4.4 Calculations
% Recovery =
e an
,nd end of each
hours, whichever
tion.
Eq. D/IN-7
TXUA Coheentialtidn
4.3.7.4.5 Technical Ac£££tance Criteria
Recovery of the/CRQIs-s£and^rd shall
true value for eaten
:hin ± 15 percent of the
ysis.
4.3.7.4.6 Corre'ct
If the CRi
analysis shall
samples since the
4.3.7.4.7
not fall within the control limit, the
, the problem corrected and the analytical
CRQL standard reanalyzed.
found concentration (jig/L) , true
..percent recovery on FORM III-AAIN.
The conc~Bntratl«n/rang'e over which the ICP calibration curve remains
linear must be~^determirred and any values above this linear range shall
be diluted and reanalyzed.
July, 1991
Page D-18/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambient A,
4.3.7.5.2 Frequency
For all ICP analyses, a linear range verific
shall be analyzed at the beginning and end of
run, or a minimum of twice per eight hour wor
more frequent, but not before the ICV. Thi
all wavelengths used for each analyte repo
4.3.7.5.3 Procedure
The standard shall be analyzed as tl
analytical sample (i.e., each measure/
and/or any other procedure normally
separate samples).
check standard
Cample analysis
whichever is
LI be run for
4.3.7.5.4 Calculations
% Recovery =
Found Concenti
4.3.7.5.5 Technical Acceptance
Recovery for the linear rai
of the true value (i.e., 90-111
4.3.7.5.6 Corrective Action
it were a separate
:ollowed by a rinse
:n the analysis of
Eq. D/IN-8
ithin ± 10 percent
dard does not meet the
shall be terminated
all be reanalyzed until the
ion of this standard that meets
the instrument linear range
under this contract without
If the recovery,
technical accept^nce^c?
and successive
control limits
the control
beyond whic
dilution of
4.3.7.5.7 Documenta
Report the linear rangeXs^tandajds found concentration (in
true ^once«tra*ion UX/^g/L) lied/percent recovery for each analyte on
FORM/I I P^AAIN. ^ X
4.3./. 6
1C? system is not contaminated, an initial
shall be analyzed after calibration.
July, 1991
Page D-19/IN
-------
SOW Ncr-^XXX - Ambient Ai:
4.3.7.6.2 Frequency
The ICB shall be analyzed each time the systt
immediately after the ICV.
4.3.7.6.3 Procedure
If the absolute value of the ICB is greats
shall be reported.
4.3.7.6.4 Calculations
Not applicable.
4.3.7.6.5 Technical Acceptance
The absolute value of the ICB must be le>5vvthanxthe CRQL.
4.3.7.6.6 Corrective Action
alibrated and
When the ICB concentrati
criteria, terminate analysis ,\co
the calibration, and reanalyze\the
ical acceptance
calibrate, verify
It
4.3.7.6.7 Documentation
Report the ICB valu
4.3.7.7 Continuing
4.3.7.7.1 Suram
To ensure
run, continui
4.3.7.7.2 Frequency
Anal
whichever
'is not contaminated during the analysis
'blanks (CCB) are analyzed.
f 10 percent or every two hours,
A
absolute
reported.
the last CCV in the analysis run. If the
is greater than the IDL, the result shall be
July, 1991
Page D-20/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.3.7.7.4 Calculations
Not applicable.
4.3,7.7.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
The absolute value of the CCB must be le
4.3.7.7.6 Corrective Action
When the CCB concentration does not
criteria, terminate analysis, correct
the calibration, and reanalyze the
all analytical samples since the la<
4.3.7.7.7 Documentation
Report the CCB values in Mg/L on FORM IV-"}
4.3.7.8 Preparation Blanks
4.3.7.8.1 Summary
To ensure against contamina\ion\durin|
preparation blank (PB) is analy^
4.3.7.8.2 Frequency
At least one PB
each batch of samzfle
4.3.7.8.3 Proce.
The PB sh
sample preparation
The first batch
second batch__ofsample
the technical acceptance
ecalibrate, verify
ytical samples (or
analyzed).
paration, a
with every SDG or with
more frequent.
•rater processed through each
procedure step.
in a SDG shall be assigned to FBI, the
etc.
ce Criteria
B must be less than the CRQL.
July, 1991
Page D-21/IN
-------
Exhibit D
sow
Ambient Air
4.3.7.8.6 Corrective Action
If the- absolute value of the concentration o;
equal to the CRQL, sample results are not cor
is less than or
associ;
If any analyte concentration in the PB i
concentration of the analyte in the
times the PB concentration. Otherwise,
PB and with the analyte's concentration
concentration and above the CRQL shall
for that analyte. The sample concent^at
the PB value.
If an analyte concentration in
then all samples reported below 10
shall be redigested and reanalyzed.
4.3.7.8.7 Documentation
The values for the PB sh
4.3.7.9 ICP Interference Check
4.3.7.9.1 Summary
lowest
than 10 times the PB
and reanalyzed
be corrected for
the negative CRQL,
ociated with the PB
RM IV-AAIN.
Correction factors, an ICP
of each analysis run or a
hift, whichever is more
To verify intereleraent, and
Interference Check
4.3.7.9.2 Freque
Analyze the
minimum of twi
frequent, bu/not
4.3.7.9.3 Procedur^
The ICS--c~5nsT5
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
deviation shall be established by initially analysing/the ICS at least
five times repetitively for each analyte.
analyzed by ICP
ined by
' for the
If true values for analytes contained in th
are not supplied with the ICS, the mean shal
initially analyzing the ICS at least five t
particular analytes. This mean determination hall
analytical run where the results for the
met all contract specifications. Additi
initial mean determination is to be use
lifetime of that solution (i.e., until/ the' solution is exhausted).
4.3.7.9.4 Calculations
% Recovery =
an
where:
Standard deviation: and
x — mean
4.3.7.9.5 Techni
Eq. D/IN-9
Eq. D/IN-10
Recovery fo
(i.e., 80-120/
4.3.7.9.6 Co
If the ICS
criteria
instr
analy
The
witnfra ± 20 percent of the true value
s not meet the technical acceptance
\s, correct the problem, recalibrate the
, and reanalyze all of the
the last compliant ICS.
.centration (/tg/L) , true concentration
:ean and standard deviation on FORM V-AAIN.
deviation shall be reported in the raw data.
July, 1991
Page D-23/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW NoCxXXX - Ambient Air
4.3.7.10
Spike Sample Analysis
4.3.7.10.1 Summary
To provide information about the effect o
digestion, a known amount of analyte is add
4.3.7.10.2 Frequency
At least one spike sample analysis
of samples for each SDG. EPA may reqt,
analysis upon special request by the.
Contractor will be paid.
If two analytical methods are usec
the same analyte within a SDG (i.e., 1C!
shall be run by each method used.
ormed
4.3.7.10.3
Procedure
The spike is added befor
microwave digestion).
Samples identified as field
analysis. EPA may require that a
spike sample analysis. In the
spike sample per SDC
contract criteria,/flag_all
method in the SDC
4.3.7.10.4
on each group
spike sample
for which the
reported values for
), then spike samples
. e. , prior to the
be used for spiked sample
sample be used for the
here there is more than one
recovery is not within
he same matrix, level, and
Eq. D/IN-11
100
pe
sample
of the du
percent reco
is\ performed on the same sample that is chosen
rialysis, spike calculations shall be
ilt$ of the sample designated as the "original
Duplicate Sample Analysis). The average
Its/cannot be used for the purpose of determining
July, 1991
Page D-24/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambienc Air
When the sample concentration is less than the instrument detection
limit, use SR = 0 only for purposes of calculating percent recovery.
4.3.7.10.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
Recovery for the spike should be within ±
amount (i.e., 75-125 percent).
4.3.7.10.6 Corrective Action
If the spike recovery is not within/^he/limits of 75-125 percent,
the data of all samples received associated with/€hat spike sample and
determined by the same analytical me/hooY shall bfe flagged with the
letter "N" on FORMs I-AAIN and VI-AAIN,
An exception to this rule is grarited iri^&ytua^ions where the sample
concentration exceeds the spike concen£r?ation b^f a factor of four or
more. In such an event, the data shall beN^por^eHi unflagged even if
the percent recovery does not meet the 75-125fs.ercentxrecovery
criteria.
4.3.7.10.7 Documentation
Report the spiked sample results, sample/ result^ spike added and
percent recovery for the spike aamp\e Analysis on FORM VI-AAIN.
The units for reporting spike sample re<
4.3.7.11 Analytical SpJ.ke Sample Analysis'
4. 3 . 7 .11.1 Sunm
ults will be in A«g/L-
!ethod of Standard Additions
To provide /information
measurement sys tern and
interference^^fect^v. tfte
utilized.
4.3.7.11.2
kbovit the\^ffeoft of the sample matrix on the
ensure against bias resulting from
^ethod of Standard Additions (MSA) is
At Zeas/fc-"one~-spike "Sample a"hlyte withi/ a/SDG (i.e., ICP and GFAA), then spike samples
shall be^cun bjNeach .metbtod used. The frequency of MSA will depend of
the recover^-Qf thexyana/ytical spike.
July, 1991
Page D-25/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No/rvXXX - Ambient Air
4.3.7.11.3 Procedure
The analytical spike sample analysis shall b
containing measurable amounts of the analytes.
rmed on a sample
The spike is added after the sample prepa,
analysis.
Samples identified as field blanks capriotybe used for spiked s<
analysis.
EPA may require that a specific sa
analysis.
The analyte spike shall be spiked
percent of the analyte's linear range.
The sample and spiked sample shall be at the s
In the instance where the
per SDG and one spike sampl
flag all the samples of the s
and run the MSA series.
The sample and three spikes shal
quantitation (the "initial" spike
from use in the MSA
MSA spikes sha
a) Spike 1 is
b) Spike 2 is
c) Spike 3 i
the spike sample
tration equal to 30
on.
= Spiked Sampld Reteult;
= Sample Result): and
Spike Added.
4.3.7.11.4 Calcut
one spike Sample per method
ntract criteria,
'ethod in the SDG
alyzed consecutively for MSA
a is specifically excluded
.the linear range in
the linear range in
the linear range in
Eq. D/IN-12
x 100
If the^soike ^^analys/is is performed on the same sample that is chosen
for the duplicate sample'analysis, spike calculations shall be
performed usingtfee results of the sample designated as the "original
July. 1991
Page D-26/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
sample" (see part 4.3.7.12, Duplicate Sample Analysisy. The average
of the duplicate results cannot be used for the pjarpc/se of determining
percent recovery.
When sample concentration is less than the
purposes of calculating percent recovery.
4.3.7.11.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
Recovery for the analytical spike shcy
the spiked amount (i.e., 85-115 percen^
4.3.7.11.6 Corrective Action
0 only for
/or
thin
lall
ierl
the P£
If the spike recovery is not at
percent, a second analytical spike
analytical spike is out of control, tlv
same spiking solution. If spiking the PB
out of control, the spiking solution shall be
previous spiking procedure repeated. If not, the"
received associated with th,
analytical method with the
and dete
ORM VII-AA
analytical
imits of 85-115
rmed. If the second
is spiked with the
recovery that is
:ed and the
all samples
.ed by the same
IN and VII-AAIN.
flat
4.3.7.11.7 Documentation
Report the spiked sample resu£
percent recovery (positive,
spike sample analysi
The units for /ep
Mg/L.
4.3.7.12 Dup
4.3.7.12.1 S'
Duplicate aliquo
and analys
analyti
e results, spike added and
zero) for the analytical
ample results will be in
4.3.7
iample are carried through the preparation
nation about the precision of the
ix effects.
July, 1991
ample analysis shall be performed on each
DG. EPA may require additional duplicate
upon spfeclal request by the Project Officer, for which
will be/pa/d.
Page D-27/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW MtfXXXX
If two analytical methods are used to obtain
the same a'nalyte within a SDG (i.e., ICP and
samples shall be run by each method used.
4.3.7.12.3 Procedure
Samples identified as field blanks
sample analysis.
EPA may require that a specific samp
sample analysis.
In the instance where there is more.
SDG and one duplicate result is nc
the samples of the SDG.
Duplicate sample analyses are required
percent difference.
4.3.7.12.4 Calculations
reported values for
'then duplicate
where:
RPD
S
D
Duplicates c_
i
4.3.7.12.5 Tec1
A control limit oJ
and d
(Exhibj
valuer le-s's than"
:or the duplicate
licate sample per
criteria, flag all
tions of relative
Eq. D/IN-13
limt
and
ing on FORM I-AAIN.
cent for RPD shall be used for original
greyer than or equal to five times CRQL
± CRQL shall be used for sample
imes CRQc.
he five times CRQL level and the other is
ria.
afe less than the IDL, the RPD is not
calcu
July, 1991
Page D-28/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX,- Ambient Air
Specific control limits for each analyte will be
AAIN at a'later date, based on precision results.,
4.3.7.12.6 Corrective Action
If the duplicate sample results are outsit
with an asterisk all the data for samples re'ce:
that duplicate sample.
4.3.7.12.7 Documentation
The results in jig/L of the duplicates
reported on FORM VIII-AAIN.
The absolute value of the contr
the "CONTROL LIMIT" column on FORM
4.3.7.13 Laboratory Control Samples
4.3.7.13.1 Summary
A laboratory control sample
against analyte loss in the
ed to FORM IX-
iraits, flag
with
shall be entered in
analyzes to ensure
4.3 .7.13.2 Frequency
One LCS shall be prepared and an
a SDG, or for each ba£eh-of samples,
4.3.7.13.3 Proced/re
A LCS shall
preparations,
EPA samples
for every group of samples in
,ever is more frequent.
e using the same sample
procedures employed for the
The LCS solut
EPA Quality Assuraiv
be used.)
4.3.7.12^
se obtained from EPA. (If unavailable, other
^samples or other certified materials may
_\Found Concentration
True Concentration
x 100
Eq. D/IN-14
July, 1991
Page D-29/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW
Ambient Ai:
4.3.7.13.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
Recovery for the LCS shall be within ± 20 pe^entS^ the true value
(i.e., 80-120 percent), with the exception of
Sb:
4.3.7.13.6 Corrective Action
If the percent recovery for the LCS falls ^outside the technic
acceptance criteria, then the analyses stiall/be terminated, the
problem corrected, and the samples asso/iaKed with,^that LCS reprepared
and reanalyzed.
4.3.7.13.7 Documentation
Report the LCS found concentration
, and percent recovery on FORM IX-AA^
4.3.7.14 Instrument Detection Limits
4.3.7.14.1 Summary
Prior to sample analysis, t
be determined for each instrume
4.3.7.14.2 Frequency
concentration (in
det
IDLs shall be
and at least quart
the contract.
4.3.7.14.3 Proc,
IDLs (in
t 99) by the
consecutive analys
shall be performed as
(i.e. , eaph"~meastn?€ment nv
limit (IDL) shall
,pf the start of the contract
months) until the end of
termined by multiplying 3.707 (Student
.on for each analyte obtained from the
;en different PB extracts. Each measurement
were a separate analytical sample
llowed by a rinse and/or any other
procedure normally p^r-formedT'betw^en the analysis of separate
sampled) ./IDLs shaJJ be\determihed and reported for each wavelength
used/in /he analysis i*f the samples.
Che/quarterly determined \IDL for an instrument shall always be used
the^-LDL for that insttumint during that quarter. If the instrument
is Adjustiettvin anyway tttat Lay affect the IDL, the IDL for that
instrument shail be re
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.3.7.14.4 Calculations
IDL = 3.707 x on_ j
4.3.7.14.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
The IDLs shall be < the CRQLs in Exhibi
4.3.7.14.6 Corrective Action
Eq. D/IN-15
so;
lyte, that
lyte concentration
IDL.
If an instrument's IDL exceeds the
instrument cannot be used in this
is greater than or equal to two ti
4.3.7.14.7 Documentation
IDLs shall be submitted with each data
XI-AAIN for each instrument used. If multiple
for the analysis of an analy/te^within a SDG, the'
analyte shall be used for
4.3.7.15 Interelement Corre*
4. 3 . 7 .15.1 Summary
To ensure against spectral interferences, interelement correction
factors are determined—f-er all waverengtl^s used for each analyte
reported by ICP.
,nd reported on FORM
ients are used
IDL for the
s for that SDG.
4.3.7.15.2 Fre
Before any
interelement/co
months prior
thereafter
under this contract, the ICP
determined within three
contract analyses and at least annually
the
sr spectral interference due to Al, Ca, Fe, K,
nined for all ICP instruments at all
ich\analyte reported by ICP. Correction factors
iue to analytes other than Al, Ca, Fe, K,
irtad if they were applied.
ijusted in any way that may affect the ICP
factors, the factors shall be redetermined and
ir use.
July, 1991
Page D-31/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW
Ambient Air
Follow the instrument manufacturer's recommendations for applying
interelemenf correction factors.
4.3.7.15.4 Calculations
Not applicable
4.3.7.15.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria/
Not applicable
4.3.7.15.6 Corrective Action
Not applicable
4.3.7.15.7 Documentation
ition shall be
Results from interelement correction factors
reported on FORM XI-AAIN for/*U__ICJ> parameters.
4.3.8. Instrument Operation
4.3.8.1 No detailed operating instruction/ a/ to the~~optimization of the
plasma power, argon flows, torch an>i co\l/corifiguration, etc. will be
given. The analyst should follow the\ instractions provided by the
manufacturer of the particular instrument.
4.3.8.2 The sample
The use of a perist
A tip washer is a
sample flow syste
line just before
runs to the neb
third is connect^
the carrier flow is
carrier argon flow
the salt buL3rdnp~a
4.3.8.3 /Ch
characteristics
concro/ile
introductions system is\to ""be of a pneumatic type.
pltijC pumpXinstf-ad of dv&ecz aspiration is required.
useful jaid and ean be Vasily inserted into the
r" on the carrier argon flow
.e arm of the "tee connector"
'to the carrier argon flow line and the
rom the peristaltic pump. When a drop in
a small pulse of water is pumped into the
and Si^wn through the nebulizer orifice, dissolving
resorting the\qriginal carrier argon flow.
entering ttye nemilizei
lize
?erved<
awn
caXrier argon flow may change the emission
aly\te. The use of a digital mass flow
to Control the carrier argon flow.
4.343.4 "For direct reading instruments, every solution, including
calibration standards, cal/ibr/ation and method blanks, reference samples,
and sampie-s shaTi^be anaWzaa using two full exposures (peak scan) , each
of which is sufficient zo meet the instrument detection limit (at each
analyte emissionXUne): All exposure times shall be the same for all
analyses and all quarterly analyses (i.e., method detection limit and
July, 1991
Page D-32/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
„interelement correction factor.) Each background spe/tral region shall
have an exposure time equivalent to a full exposure jc.im? for direct
reading instruments.
4.3.8.5 Selection of the appropriate backgroundyfepectralxregion for each
analyte shall account for the major interferents/wi^fcic thaKregion and
for the possibility of analyte line broadening/at/nigh concentrations
4.3.8.5.1 One of the best ways to select
spectral region is to perform a wavelengt;
wavelengths in the presence of metals
levels in the samples. Alternately, ifth^ instr
automatic scanning capability, selection of the bXck
region will have to be determined on/the/basis o,
experience.
appropriate background
4n around the analyt^
.tly encountered at high
does not have
ground spectral
'nual scans and
4.3.8.5.2 It is possible, if the backg1
too close to the analyte line, to observe
or other erroneous net intensity readings
error, it is required, at a minimum, that
concentrations be derived fr
addition, the equivalent cortcen
background correction wavelen
uncorrected intensity data for
correction wavelengths shall be
data prior to submission to assureXtha^
this type of error.
4.3.8.6 A calibratio
be sufficient to pr
jund coi
ler
rection wavelength is
.et intensity of zero
ircumventing this
uncorrecbcd analyte
tted raw data>^ckage. In
.etermined at the
inally, all
background
e analyst shall review this
orted values do not reflect
sample aspiration should
iples.
4.3.8.7 The determination of/the linear^-canee of each analyte line,
interference effects/ and an/ typeorsxietec~eion limit or precision
measurement shal:l b^establfshed under thVsame conditions used for the
analysis of the^ample^. including the background correction scheme,
4.3.9 Procedure
4.3.9.1
4.3.9.
instrumen
s^rument with proper operating parameters. The
to become thermally stable before beginning
\least 30 minutes of operation with the
jions.
iate operating configuration of the
July, 1991
Page D-33/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOU NoyTSQCX - Ambient Air
4.3.9.1.3 Perform the appropriate steps recommended Ky the
manufacturer to align the exit slits with the entrance slit. These
steps are commonly called the profile or wavelength calibration
procedure.
4.3.9.2 Analysis Sequence
4.3.9.2.1 Before beginning the sample
initial calibration blank (ICB), initial
(ICV), interference check sample, two t
the linear range standard (LRS). The
values shall not deviate from the act
The calibration blank values may not
check sample found values shall not
the true values. If these conditions
discontinue the analysis and refer to
an
Initial and Continuing Calibration Blanks) an
information.
4.3.9.2.2 Upon successful analysis o
analyze all PB extract(s) preoar
blank(s) values are not less tftan ^r equa
and E for the appropriate action
ys/.s run, analyze
ration verifications
standard (CRI) and
concentration
e than 10 percent.
The interference
than 20 percent of
notTNhet/for any analyte,
uality Control -
the sample
to/-eha. CR
dditional
CRI, LRS, and ICS,
f. any of the
see Exhibits D
4.3.9.2.3 If the PB and LCS values\are wdthin the acceptable ranges,
analyze the spike sample and the analy^isxspike sample. If the recovery
of any analyte deviaterg^Tromxthe acceptable\ranges, see Exhibit E for
the appropriate actibn.^_£rpcefed to the analysis of samples if the
recoveries are acceptable or\ af|t£i-_consultinR/Exhibits D and E.
oncinuing c,ali
calibration Sola
of
lysej
4.3.9.2.4 The
the continuing
analytical s
after the ana
wash or other clearf
deviate from the actua
the absolupe-^aTCce-s^for
conditions are .not
the anaiysvsands&e^ Exh
(CCF)
ication standard (ICV) and
. be analyzed after every 10
analyst "shall run CCV and CCB samples
vious sample, but prior to use of a tip
ce. CCV concentration values shall not
more than 10 percent. In addition,
CCB Shall be lower than the CRQLs. If these
uring samples analysis, discontinue
its D aWa E for the appropriate action.
4.3.9.3
4.3.9.3.1
ttte sample analysis run, analyze the ICS, CRI,
the\ values for any of these samples deviates from
•xhibits D and E for additional information.
tracts shall first be analyzed without any
July, 1991
Page D-34/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
dilution. Diluting sample extracts is permissible iff necessary,
provided that the dilution does not produce result/ bedow CRQL.
4.3.9.3.2 All concentrations within the linear/rarige of the analyte
shall be reported. All concentrations reported/shall DB^obtained within
the established linear range for that analysis/ruiV^and interference
corrections shall be made based on the actual; concentratjipn ofx^he
interferent and not the apparent concentrat&m /obtained wheTk. the
interferent concentration is above the lin^ars range.
4.3.9.4 Method of Standard Additions
4.3.9.4.1 To the first aliquot add ah a£propric
spiking standard reagent blank solution ./mix, ar
/olume of the
ilyze.
4.3.9.4.2 Add appropriate volumes M^the "fep^kin^ standard to the
remaining three aliquots that result in'&oncentr^tions at 20 percent, 40
percent and 60 percent of the instrument's^inearrange. The spiking
standard solution volume added to each aliquot*shall rteit exceed 10
percent of the volume of the aliquot. Add the appropriate amount of
blank solution to each aliqupt to~~ffiafce—ttie^total of spike plus blank
volumes added equal.
4.3.9.4.3 Using a calculator^ a\stati£tL6al~paCteage on a computer,
determine the slope, the intercepts\f tfhe/ordinate (y-axis) and the
abscissa (x-axis), and the correla^ion^cofiffficient using the found
concentration as the ordinate and trie st/ndard addition concentration as
the abscissa. The abs^-ttrts^value of she intercept of the abscissa is
the concentration o? the analyte in the\dilVce solution. If the
jss\than 0.99!
correction coeffic/en
repeated. If the/second ana
0.995, then repe4t ifhe analysis
digest. Be cer/tain to correct,
using a smaller sample digest
is still less
4.3.9.5 Calculations
tr^en the analyses shall be
coefficient is less than
Her aliquot of the sample
ference in volume created by
aliquot.^^f the correlation coefficient
g the sample data with a "+".
the analyte^ir concentration (in Mg/m3), multiply
anaiyt^ values (in Mg/D by nine times the
,ers) used in the extraction and divide by the
3) sampled and the number of l"x 8" strips
.e factor "9" represents the total area (63
Ixposed to the air stream divided by the
l"x 8" strip.
July, 1991
Page D-35/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW N(/NZXX - Ambient-
Analyte Cone.
air, \ig/m2
9 x
Interference-Corrected
Analyte Value.
no. of
strips digested
abs
Volume, L Eq. D/IN-16
to extract the
r, for subsequent
4.4.3.3 Hot place
4.4.3.4 Centrifu_
(International Equip
4.4.3.5 Cen.
polypropy
4.3.9.6 Documentation
4.3.9.6.1 .Report the air concentration
interference-corrected analyte value in
4.4 ALTERNATE SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR GFAA
4.4.1 Introduction
4.4.1.1 This method describes a hot extract
inorganics from the particulate loaded glass-:__
analysis by graphite furnace atomic absorption
4.4.2 Summary of Method
4.4.2.1 The inorganics are extrXcte
After cooling to room temperature \th
4.4.3 Apparatus and Materials
4.4.3.1 Graphite furn
4.4.3.2 Volumetric ^la^sware^
Borosilicate).
from the filter.
is allowed to settle.
ectrometer (GFAA).
Opacity (Class A
.bes:
f
}f maintaining speeds of 2000 rpm
Model UV or equivalent).
lene tube with screw tops of
4.4.37
fiber fif
Automat icXdispens ing with an accuracy of 0.1 mL or
~, (Grumman Automatic Dispensing Pipet,
worn while cutting and handling glass-
July, 1991
Page D-36/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
.4.4.3.8 Template: To aid in sectioning the glass-flbei? filter.
Federal Register 1978, 43 (Oct. 5), 46258-46261. See Figure D/IN-1.
4.4.3.9 Pizza cutter: Thin wheel (< 1 mm).
4.4.4 Reagents
4.4.4.1 Nitric Acid (HN03): Concentrated, 1
spectrographic grade.
4.4.4.1.1 Nitric Acid, 3M: Prepare by
nitric acid (4.4.4.1) to distilled, deiq
to 1 L.
NOTE: Nitric acid fumes are toxic.
hood. Stir slowly.
4.4.4.2 ASTM Type II Water (ASTM D1193):
4.4.5 Sample Preservation and Handling
4.4.5.1 Exposed Hi-Vol filters
material inward, enclosed in p
30°C until analysis.
4.4.6 Hot Extraction Procedure
4.4.6.1 Cut a 1" x 8'
for Lead (see Figure
tng 192 mL of concentrated
slowly diluting
11-ventilated fume
4.4.6.2 Fold the /tri
15 mL of 3 M HN03
a watch glass, ylt ps impor
corrosion prod
are not deposi
NOTE: Ic is s'uggested
ensure adequate—stolume fo
4.4.6.3
hood f
NOTE;
be monitored.
ialf with particulate
and/stored at 15 to
the Federal Reference Method
to
distilled,
in a 150-mL beaker. Add
iple. Cover the beaker with
sample covered so that
face which may contain lead)
than one strip per filter be extracted to
,and QC analysis.
jample rn^ beaker on a hot plate under a fume
,t let the sample evaporate to dryness.
toxic.
love the beaker from the hot plate, and cool
nse watch glass and sides of beaker with
July, 1991
Page D-37/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW. NcvT^XXX - Ambient Air
A.4.6.5 Decant extract and rinsing into a 100-mL vo
distilled, deiohized water to the 40-mL mark on bearer
glass and set aside for a minimum of 30 minutes.
and cannot be omitted since it allows the HN03 t
diffuse into the rinse water.
ric flask. Add
cover with watch
a critical step
filter to
4.4.6.6 Decant the water from the filter int>
rinse filter and beaker twice with distillec
rinsing to volumetric flask until total vojXime/is 80 to 85 mL.
4.4.6.7 Stopper flask and shake vigorou
approximately five minutes or until foa.
4.4.6.8 Bring solution to volume wit
mix thoroughly. Allow solution to sett
with analysis.
NOTE: Do not filter the extracted sample to removfexpartitulate matter
because of loss of lead due to filtration. The f inal^s^tr/ct can be
centrifuged at 2000 RPM for 30/minutesto~Teaoxe__any suspended solids.
ionized water, and
/our before proceeding
4.4.6.9 If sample is to be
to a polyethylene bottle, being c
solids.
alysis, transfer
the settled
acted and analyzed, and
evels of metals in the
4.4.6.10 Samples prepared by hot exXracs.ion procedure are now in 0.45
M HN04.
4.4.6.11 Blank
digestion blanks s
reagents used.
4.5 SAMPLE ANALYSIS
4.5.1 Introduction
.CE ATOMIC ABSORPTION (GFAA)
4.5.1.1 GFAA-~analysis proceNiiures "asce provided to achieve lower detection
limits (where reguired)^for the^analysis of inorganic analytes listed in
Table 1 a^d/^ieTarg>C Ana^yte List/in Exhibit C.
4.5.1..2 Because of the differences among various makes and models of
satisfactory instruments, mo detailed instrument operating instructions
can foe prodded. Instead, (thai analyst is referred to the instructions
provided by tke manufactuiyer pf that instrument.
July, 1991
Page D-38/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
:h an atomic
of a sample is
.ess, charred,
d through
nsity
the
are';
4.5t2 Summary of Method
4.5.2.1 Using the furnace technique in conjunctio
absorption spectrophotometer, a representative al
placed in a graphite tube in the furnace, evapor,
and atomized. Radiation from a given excited e,
the vapor containing ground state atoms of th
of the transmitted radiation decreases in projx^r/tion
ground state element in the vapor. The met.
placed in the beam of radiation by increasing/che temperature of
furnace thereby causing the injected specimen'to be volatilized.
monochromator isolates the characteristic rafdiation/ftom the hollow
cathode lamp and a photosensitive devic/ me4sures #he /attenuated
transmitted radiation.
4.5.3 Interferences
4.5.3.1 The composition of the sample matrixNxan haVea major effect on
the analysis. By modifying the sample matrix, etfcher tbxremove
interferences or to stabilize tfteanalyte, interferences ^kn be
minimized. Examples are the aaditiorTTrf-^nimonium nitrate to remove
alkali chlorides and the addic^ont^of^ammoniumpRospbate^ to retain
cadmium.
4.5.3.2 Gases generated in the furnac\ dri
molecular absorption bands encompassing
Therefore the use of background corre6iorvis
analysis.
atomization may have
analytical wavelength.
required for all furnace
4.5.3.3 Continuum
background interference'. Whei
compensated for, (Zhoose an alj
analyte from the/intzerferantx
correction (e.
rection c^mo^ correct for all types of
rourtd/interference cannot be
th, chemically separate the
rnate form of background
ion).
4.5.3.4 Interferenfc^s from ^ smoke producing sample matrix can sometimes
be reduced by extending^he charring time at a higher temperature or
utilizing anasfeiag^cycle^bn^ the^esence of air. Care must be taken to
prevent loXs of analyst
4.5.4 Apparatus
4.5.4/1 /Atomic absorptionX spfectrophotometer: Single or dual channel,
single d-i^double beam instrument having a grating monochromator,
photomultipper detector, /adjustable slits, a wavelength range of 190- to
800-nm,xfeackgrbu^d correc/tio^i, and provisions for interfacing with a
recording device.
July, 1991
Page D-39/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No/^-XXX - Ambient Air
.4.5.4.2 Graphite furnace: Any furnace device capable
specified temperatures Is satisfactory.
4.5.4.3 Operational Requirements. Because of t.
various makes and models of satisfactory instr
operating instructions can be provided. Inste
follow the instructions provided by the manuf,
instrument. Sensitivity, instrument detection
dynamic range and interference effects mus
established for each individual analyte o
It is the responsibility of the analyst
configuration and operating conditions
requirements set forth in this SOW and/to
confirming instrument performance and^analy
reaching the
'be
between
investigated and
particular instrument.
he instrument
analytical
lity control data
Its.
verify that
/sed/satisfy
aintair/ q
4.5.5 Reagents and Standards
4.5.5.1 Matrix matching with the samples is mandatt
standards, and quality control s^m^les^ to avoid inacci
values due to possible standarc
blanks,
concentration
curve
4.5.5.2 Calibration standards ar« prepared tty diluting/stock metal
solutions at the time of analysis amd^are discarded after use. Prepare
at least three calibration standards^in^ctfaduated amounts in the
appropriate range by combining an appKoprialze volume of stock solution in
a volumetric flask. The calibration st^nda^ds must be prepared using the
same type of acid or confbinattiap of acids\at^he same concentration.
4.5.5.3 Two types o,
calibration blank
preparation blank
from various aci
(
4.5.6 Quality Control
4.5.6.1 Instrument Call
4.5.6.1
fo\ GJfAA analysis; the
the^analytical curve while the
ible contamination resulting
sing.
to the anaiysik of samples and required QC, each GFAA
shall be initially calibrated to determine instrument
itivity.
4.5.
\_^\
Instruments stoaLi be7 calibrated daily or once every 24 hours and
each time the >nstrumenjz is set up.
July, 1991
Page D-40/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW,No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.5.6.1.3 Procedure
Calibration standards shall be prepared
solutions at the time of analysis, and are dis
Calibration standards shall be prepared
or combination of acids, and at the same
in the samples following sample preparati
iting the stock
id after use.
The instrument shall be calibrated
manufacturer's recommended procedures
Beginning with the calibration blank
standard, run at least three standa
shall be a blank, and another shal
Baseline correction is acceptab
each and every sample, or after the
Resloping is acceptable as long as it is
immediately followed by a CCV and CCB.
4.5.6.1.4 Calculations
Not applicable.
4.5.6.1.5 Technical Acceptance
Not applicable.
4.5.6.1.6 Correc
Not applica
4.5.6.1.7 Do/um
of acid
1 result
:or/ling to instrument
at least four standards.
Awards the highest
ition standard
is performed after
respectively.
preceded and
The instrume
the raw data. Con
tization date and time shall be included in
shall be in
at ion
'AA system has been calibrated, the accuracy
shall be verified and documented for every
EPA Initial Calibration Verification
wavelength used for analysis.
July, 1991
Page D-41/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No^XXX - Ambient: Air
4.5.6.2.2 Frequency
Each time the instrument is calibrated, the
immediately following the calibration and befo
analyzed.
4.5.6.2.3 Procedure
indei
If the ICV solution(s) are not availat
certified solution of an analyte is not/avc
analyses shall be conducted on an ii
concentration other than that used
within the linear range. An indepei
standard composed of the analytes
used in the standards for the instrv.
4.5.6.2.4 Calculations
% Recovery =
be run
les are
4.5.6.2.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
Recovery for the ICV shall be within i( 10 percent of the true value
(i.e., 90-110 percent
EPA,
from any source,
sd at a
Libration, but
'/s defined as a
source than those
fion.
Eq. D/IN-17
4.5.6.2.6 Corrective
When recovery
the analysis s
instrument reycali'
4.5.6.2.7 Documenba£ion
Report
chnical acceptance criteria,
lem corrected, the
ion reverified.
(in Mg/L), true concentration( in
II-AAIN.
;pvery
Lon Verification
calibration/accuracy during an analysis run, a continuing
calibration/"Verification solution (CCV) is analyzed and reported for
every wavfeiengtn^-^used/for/the analysis of each analyte.
July, 1991
Page D-42/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.5.6.3.2 Frequency
The CCV is run at a frequency of 10 percent 017 every two hours
during an analysis run, whichever is more freqt
The CCV is also run after the last analytical
run.
the analysis
oncentration at or near the
is runs for a Case
4.5.6.3.3 Procedure
The CCV shall contain the analytes a
mid-range of the calibration curve.
The same CCV shall be used throu.
of samples received.
If the ICV solution(s) are not available froitf EPA, or where a
certified solution of an analyte is not avat b\ applied to the CCV to a
ttent applied co tne associated analytical
in\£ime between a CCV analysis
s well as the difference in
-ample immediately preceding
the ]/oweiSt difference in time between any two
Les associated with the CCV.
founc
oncentration
T5*«e Concentration
x. 100
Eq. D/IN-18
4.5/6.3/5 Technical Accentcince Criteria
for the CCV/sha/Ll be within ± 15 percent of the true value
percent)
July, 1991
Page D-43/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No/^KXX - Ambient Air
tance criteria,
instrument
• 4.5.6.3.6 .Corrective Action
When recoveries of the CCV exceed the techni
the analysis shall be stopped, the problem co
recalibrated, the calibration reverified, an
analytical samples reanalyzed (or all analytic
last compliant CCV analyzed).
4.5.6.3.7 Documentation
Report the CCV found concentration
Mg/L), and percent recovery on FORM
4.5.6.4 CRQL Standard
4.5.6.4.1 Summary
To verify linearity near the CRQL, the Contrac-fc
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient! Air
Mg/L), true
III-AAIN.
4.5.6.4.7 Documentation
Report the CRQL standard's found concentration
concentration (in Mg/D. and percent recovery
4.5.6.5 Initial Calibration Blank
4.5.6.5.1 Summary
To verify that the GFAA system is not/cor
calibration blank (ICB) shall be analy^-fed /fter calibration.
4.5.6.5.2 Frequency
The ICB shall be analyzed each
immediately after the ICV.
the>IDL, the result
is calibrated and
4.5.6.5.7 Documenta
4.5.6.5.3 Procedure
If the absolute value of the ICB is greater
shall be reported.
4.5.6.5.4 Calculations
Not applicable.
4.5.6.5.5 Technical Acceptance Cri
The absolute value of th
/ /—^
4.5.6.5.6 Corre
When the I
criteria, te
the calibrat4
ss than the CRQL.
the technical acceptance
,e problem, recalibrate, verify
pn FORM IV-AAIN.
ition Blanks
km is not contaminated during the analysis
6n blanks (CCB) are analyzed.
July, 1991
Page D-45/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW- NcfNJEXX - Ambient Air
4.5.6.6.2 Frequency
Analyz£ the CCB at a frequency of 10 percent
whichever is more frequent.
Analyze the CCB after every CCV.
4.5.6.6.3 Procedure
A CCB shall be run after the last CC
If the absolute value of the CCB #
shall be reported.
4.5.6.6.4 Calculations
Not applicable.
4.5.6.6.5 Technical Acceptan<
The absolute value of th
4.5.6.6.6 Corrective Action
ry two hours,
lysis run.
an/the IDL, the result
CRQL.
When the CCB concentration
criteria, terminate analysis, correi
the calibration, and--feana~ivze the prfc
all analytical samples since
4.5.6.6.7 Docume;
Report the
<
4.5.6.7 Prepara
4.5.6.7.1 Summary
the technical acceptance
problem, recalibrate, verify
ing 10 analytical samples (or
iant CCB analyzed).
V-AAIN.
during sample preparation, a
;t be prepared and analyzed with every SDG
digested, whichever is more frequent.
July, 1991
Page D-46/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
The PB shall consist of ASTM Type II water processed through each
sample preparation and analysis procedure step (se4 Exhibit D) .
igned to PB one,
The first batch of samples in an SDG is to b
the second batch of samples to PB two, etc.
4.5.6.7.4 Calculations
Not applicable.
4.5.6.7.5 Technical Acceptance Criteria
The absolute value of the PB must jae
4.5.6.7.6 Corrective Action
If the absolute value of the PB concfentratiojt^ is less than or equal
to the CRQL, sample results are not
If any analyte concentration in the blank is above tfie CRQL, the
lowest concentration of thayanatyte--inthe associate's/samples must be
10 times the blank concentration OtherwTsl7~~aJ-L_samples associated
with the blank and with the anaryTe^s^^ceRcentration^ess than 10 times
the blank concentration and ab'oveNthe CRQL /sliaTlr-be/redigested and
reanalyzed for that analyte. The skmplfe concentration is not to be
corrected for the blank value. \ \/ /
If the concent rati.
all samples
shall be redigest
4.5.6.8 Spike Sam
low the negative CRQL, then
sociated with the blank
d in ftg/L on FORM IV-AAIN.
of s
analys is
Contractor
xabout the^/effect of the sample matrix on the
nount of analyte is added (spiked) into a sample.
analysis shall be performed on each group
/(EPA may require additional spike sample
icial/recfuest by the Project Officer, for which the
July, 1991
Page D-47/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW
XXX - Ambient Air
If two analytical methods are used to obtain tKe Deported values for
the same metal within a SDG (i.e., ICP and GFAA)< t/en spike samples
shall be.run by each method used.
4.5.6.8.3 Procedure
The spike is added before the sample pr
digestion).
Samples identified as field blanks
analysis.
EPA may require that a specific
analysis.
t be used for spiked sample
Le be us4d jfor the spike sample
In the instance where there is more than one<^pike sample per method
per SDG and one spike sample recovery is no^tv^witnlTi^contract criteria,
flag all the samples for the same method in
If the spik
for the dupli^at
performed us,
sample" (see
duplicate result
percent recovery
4.5.
4.5.6.8.4 Calculations
% Recover
where:
SSR = Spiked Sam
SR = Sample
SA - Spike Ade
Eq. D/IN-20
Ehe same sample that is chosen
'calculations shall be
Le designated as the "original
z'ate Sample Analysis). The average of the
used for the purpose of determining
s less than the instrument detection
or purposes of calculating percent recovery.
nee Criteria
ould be within ± 25 percent of the spiked
ceht).
July, 1991
Page D-48/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambient A:
4.5.6.8.6 Corrective Action
If the spike recovery is not at or within the/limits of 75-125
percent, the data of all samples received associate^"with that spike
sample and determined by the same analytical methodlhall be flagged
with the letter "N" on FORMs I-AAIN and VII-AAIN.T
An exception to this rule is granted in 4iRations whefre the^sample
concentration exceeds the spike concentrator/by a factor of^four
more. In such an event, the data shall lie reported unflagged even Jit
the percent recovery does not meet the /5-125 percent recovery
criteria. ' '
When the digestion spike recovery/fa^ls outsicie/the technical
acceptance criteria and the sample/test^t does/no/ exceed 4x the spike
added, an analytical spike must be>^rform^dyfor/those metals that do
not meet the specified criteria (exce^Kon: Ag£. Spike the unspiked
aliquot of the sample at 2x the indigenouK^eveTx^ 2x CRQL, whichever
is greater.
4.5.6.8.7 Documentation
Report the spiked sample
percent recovery for the dige
AAIN.
The units for reporting spike
4.5.6.9 Duplicate
4.5.6.9.1 Summary
Duplicate a
and analysis
analytical m
4.5.6.9.2 Frequency
At
group
samp
the
'spike added and
.ysis on FORM VI-
icate
samp
:ied through the preparation
about the precision of the
as matrix effects.
lalysis shall be performed on each
^ !PA may require additional duplicate
;ial request by the Project Officer, for which
"
are used to obtain the reported values for
(i.e., ICP and GFAA) , then duplicate
/ach method used.
July, 1991
Page D-49/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No^OCXX - Ambient Air
4.5.6.9.3 Procedure
Samples identified as field blanks cannot b«
s ample analysis.
EPA may require that a specific sample
sample analysis.
In the instance where there is more t#an/
method per SDG and one duplicate result
criteria, then flag all the samples frir tfie methe
Duplicate sample analyses are re^uii
percent difference.
Duplicates cannot be averaged for rep<
4.5.6.9.4 Calculations
RPD
or duplicate
te
Eq. D/IN-21
in contract
the SDG.
lation of relative
Percent Difference
(origi
where:
RPD - Relative
S = First
D = Second
4.5.6.9.5 Techni
A control
and duplicat
(Exhibit C).
values less than
If one
below, >dse
val
ca
Specif
AAIN at a lat
\Mg/L, and
g/L.
shall be used for original
greater than or equal to five times CRQL
idt of ± CRQL shall be used for sample
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambl.
4.5.6.9.6 Corrective Action
If the duplicate sample results are outside t
all the data for samples received associated w
sample with an asterisk "*
4.5.6.9.7 Documentation
The results of the duplicate sample an
FORM VIII-AAIN in
mtrol limits, flag
t duplicate
The absolute value of the control 1
the "CONTROL LIMIT" column of FORM VJ1I
4.5.6.10 Laboratory Control Sampl
4.5.6.10.1 Summary
A laboratory control sample (LCS) is diges._
against analyte loss in the sample preparation.
4.5.6.10.2 Frequency
One aqueous LCS shall be pr>
samples in a SDG or for each bafcch\i.<
at the same time) of samples,
4.5.6.10.3 Procedure
The LCS shall b4 a;
preparations, a
EPA samples re
The LCS so,
solutions ma
lalyzed to ensure
r every group of
group of samples prepared
's more frequent.
using the same sample
rocedures employed for the
EPA (if unavailable, the ICV
If the EPA LCS
samples
4.5.6
.able, other EPA Quality Assurance Check
rials may be used.
Found Concentration
True Concentration
x 100
Eq. D/IN-22
ance Criteria
July, 1991
Page D-51/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOU No/^XXX - Ambient Air
Recovery for the aqueous LCS shall be within ±/20 percent of the
true value' (I.e., 80-120 percent) with exception/of/Ag and Sb.
Technical acceptance criteria for Ag and Sb
determined at a later date.
4.5.6.10.6 Corrective Action
If the percent recovery for the LCS f/llf' outside
acceptance criteria, the analyses shall/be/terminated, the problem
corrected, and the samples associated/witn that Lj^Nreprepared and
reanalyzed.
4.5.6.10.7 Documentation
Report the LCS found concentration
and percent recovery on FORM IX-AAIN.
4.5.6.11 Analytical Spike S
4.5.6.11.1 Summary
4.5.6.11.2 Frequency
All GFAA analy
one analytical sp
The frequenc^
spike.
4.5.6.11.3 Pr
All GFAA analyses
range.
ncentration (/jg/L) ,
Analysis/Method of^ Standard Additions
•—
e effects in GFAA
To ensure against bias resu
analyses, the Method of Standard\Addltions7 (MSA) is utilized.
An analyti
sample.
iple will require at least
recovery of the analytical
MSA shall fall within the calibration
all analyses require duplicate injections.
required for MSA quantitation. Average
ed for reporting purposes.
two times CRQL) of a sample must be run
le. The percent recovery of the analytical
fethod of quantitation for the sample.
j/s not required for the pre-digestion spike
July, 1991
Page D-52/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambii
A maxipum of 10 full sample analyses to a maxim
may be performed between each consecutive calibr
and blanks. Each full MSA counts as two analyt}
determining 10 percent CCV/CCB frequency (i.e.
performed between calibration verifications).
For analytical runs containing only MSAs
used for QC samples during that run. For
an MSA mode only, MSA can be Used to det
run.
The sample and three spikes must
quantitation (the "initial" spike r
from use in the MSA quantitation).
20 injections
verifications
samples towards
full MSAs can be
MSA spikes shall be prepared sue
\
a) Spike 1 is approximately 50 percent
b) Spike 2 is approximately 100 percent
and
c) Spike 3 is approximat
(all concentrations e
4.5.6.11.4 Calculations
% Recovery =
ecutively for MSA
ically excluded
where:
SSR
SR
SA
SpikfiJd Sample R'fesi
Sample /Result; ,and
Sp/ke/Added.
e concentration;
e concentration;
'e concentration
Eq. D/IN-23
Eq. D/IN-24
where:
within ±
> tandairiKQeviat ion
Aviation; and
:ance Criteria
-QL, the duplicate injections must agree
" or CV.
July, 1991
Page D-53/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW N(X>OQCX - Ambient Air
The analytical spike recoveries for the LCS ana Pyshall be within
control limits of ±.15 percent (i.e., MSA is NOT/ pe^Tormed on the LCS
or PB). .
4.5.6.11.6 Corrective Action
If the RSD (CV) technical acceptance cri
sample once. If the criteria are still not
reported on FORM I-AAIN with the letter
NOTE: The "M" flag is required fo
the sample.
If the PB analytical spike tech;
met, verify the spiking solution by
once. If the criteria are still not
reanalyze all analytical samples associated^
the
If the LCS analytical spi
met, correct the problem an;
associated with that LCS.
4.5.6.11.7 Documentation
The raw data package must ir.cluis
values for both injections, the
variation (or RSD).
The data for each
data documentat
absorbance as
intercept, an-
of the data.
criteria are not
rerunning the PB
the problem and
blank.
echnical acceptance
analytical
4.5.6.
4.5/
ria are not
amples
•bance and concentration
lvalue, and the coefficient of
arly identified in the raw
n as the x-variable and
:he slope, x-intercept, y-
) for the least squares fit
Reported value
on FORM I-AAIN if
correlate
XII-AAlX'with
by MSA must be flagged with the letter "S"
£ion coefficient is > 0.995. If the
5, flag the data on FORMs I-AAIN and
sample
limit (IDL) shall be determined before any
ery instrument that will be used.
July, 1991
Page D-54/IN
-------
Exhibit D
.SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.5.6.12.2. Frequency
IDLs must be determined within 30 days of the
and at least quarterly (every three calendar m
4.5.6.12.3 Procedure
IDLs (in /ig/L) shall be determined by m
average of the standard deviations (ffn-i
nonconsecutive days from the analysis o
analyte in reagent water) at a concent
of the instrument manufacturer's sugg
measurements per day. Each measurement
were a separate analytical sample
followed by a rinse and/or any ot
between the analysis of separate s
and reported for each wavelength used
t of the contract
The quarterly determined IDL for an instrv
as the IDL for that instrument^ during that
is adjusted in any way that,
instrument shall be redetei
the established IDL for thatN
quarter.
IDL must be determined in /ig/L.
4.5.6.12.4 Calculatic
IDI\
where :
three times to five times
seven consecutive
brmed as though it
.rement shall be
•mally performed
shall be determined
lysis of the samples.
always be used
the instrument
for that
iubmitted for use as
remainder of the
Eq. D/IN-25
in Exhibit C.
annot meet the CRQL for an analyte, that
:o quantitate an analyte unless the sample
times the IDL.
July, 1991
Page D-55/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW Nox-OCXX - Ambient Air
For each instrument used, IDLs shall be report
submitted with each data package. If multiple G
used for the analysis of a metal within a SDG,
GFAAs shall be used for reporting concentratio;
4.5.7 Instrument Operation
4.5.7.1 Set up the instrument with the proper
established by the instrument manufacturer
(drying, charring and atomization) require/ca/eful
ensure each process is carried out effective]
allowed to become thermally stable before heginnin,
usually requires at least 30 minutes of operation
Background correction shall be used.
FORM XV-AAIN and
Instruments are
IDL for the
>r that SDG.
crating
!e individual steps
consideration to
trument shall be
analysis. This
to calibration.
The
4.5.7.2 Calibrate the instrument according^^p the
recommended procedures using calibration stan<
so
lanuf acturer' s
ions.
4.5.7.3 In order to determine l£_the sample result LSX^O b4 calculated
by MSA, an analytical spike at /two ti5e~5—€RQl
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient
hall be matrix
pe of the
ICB,
f 4.5.8.1.4 All standards, blanks, and sample soluti
matched. "A change in the acid strength changes
calibration curve and can cause inaccurate result
4.5.8.2 Analysis Sequence
4.5.8.2.1 Before beginning the sample
ICV and CRA under the same operating conditj
analyses. The ICV and CRI found concentrat_.
from the true values by more than 10 percent/ The calibration
values may not exceed the CRQL. If thes/ conditions are not met for any
element, the analysis shall be discontinue/and corrective action
applied until the conditions are met (^ee/Exhibits^D/and E for
additional information).
4.5.8.2.2 Upon successful analysis\of tnXIC^ arid ICB, analyEe all
method PB extract(s) prepared with theNLUes^ed /amples. If any of the
blank(s) are not less than or equal to theXRQL.Sw^e Exhibits D and E
for the appropriate action.
4.5.8.2.3 If the method bl
LCS. If any LCS values devote
D and E for the appropriate acti>
uesare acceptat^e/ analyze the
_from theaCce-p£able ranges, see Exhibits
4.5.8.2.4 If the LCS values art
the method spike sample. If the
the acceptable ranges, see Exhibits\D
Proceed to the analysis_af_^samples ii
after consulting Exhibits
anc
acceptable ranges, analyze
jf any element deviates from
E for the appropriate action.
.recoveries are acceptable or
4.5.8.2.5 The CGV a^d the\CCBxmtr»
-------
Exhibit D
SOW Nco^XXX - Ambient Air
4.5.8.3.2 .All concentrations reported shall be o#taifaed within the
established linear range for that analysis run. .All/concentrations
within the linear range of the analyte are to ber reported.
4.5.8.3.3 In order to determine if the sample
calculated by MSA, an analytical spike at tvp tttnes
performed and analyzed immediately after eac^K^ample analysts^, Tfis
analytical spike recovery is used to deteE&injfe the need for MSA^as
explained in part 4.5.6.11 and Exhibit E/ "^he spiking solution vol
shall not exceed 10 percent of the samp]
3.5.8.3.4 Add appropriate volumes o
remaining three aliquots that resul
100 percent, and 150 percent of theQ.nst'
spiking standard solution volume adde
10 percent of the volume of the aliquot.
blank solution to each aliquot to make the t
volumes added equal.
andard to the
of 50 percent,
near range. The
iquot shall not exceed
appropriate amount of
ike plus blank
NOTE: If more than 10 minutes has eTip^e4~_s_ince tne flfst aliquot was
analyzed, it is suggested, bW rt&C—ceguired, thlfE—the-,, CCV and the CCB be
analyzed to determine whether\recklibratic?n i*-_rj|quii7ed. Performing the
calibration verification prior B« reanalyzing thetirst aliquot and the
spiked aliquots may save consider^ble\ti!me/in the long run, as it can
eliminate the repeat analyses required if/the CCV or blank values are
not within the acceptable limits pos\
sample analysis.
4.5.8.3.5 Using a/cal
determine the slo
abscissa (x-axisY", ajfid the
concentration asr the ordina
the abscissa. /The/absolut
the concentra/ionSaf the
correction coeticien
repeated. If th
0.995, then repeat th<
digest. B
using a/*maller
is sti
4.5.8
or a stat
felatit
al package on a computer,
of thV oi&iinate (y-axis) and the
icient using the found
rd addition concentration as
ntercept of the abscissa is
ilute solution. If the
'ss than 0.995, then the analyses shall be
lysis correlation coefficient is less than
s using a smaller aliquot of the sample
the difference in volume created by
.ot. If the correlation coefficient
flag £he' sample data with a " + ".
trument detection limit (IDL) from the
thod blank analyte analyses, based on the
July, 1991
Page D-58/IN
-------
Exhibic D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.5.8.4.2.. Calculate the method blank(s) concentra
multiplying the value obtained in part 4.5.8.2 for/th
dilution factors used in part 4.5.8.1.
value
Found
Method Blank
Cone. (\ig/L)
4.5.8.4.3 Calculate sample extract concent^at
multiplying the analyte concentration calc
dilution factors used in Sections 4.5.8.1
concentration for each analyte in Mg/m3
concentration in Mg/L by the extract vo
dividing by the volume of the air samp
the number of filter strips digested.
area (63 in2) of the Hi-Vol filter
the exposed area (7 in2) in one 1"
(Mg/L) by
blank by the
Eq. D/IN-26
.Itiplying the
(liters^ times 9 and
,3) per filter and
represents the
r stream divided by
Analyte Cone.
In air, \ng/m3
Determine the
standard addition
concentration and
percent re
a sample/
concen
deter
than10
o
nee-Corrected^
Valued /r '
) Eq. D/IN-27
Analyse Ct
Dilution
Factor
Eq. D/IN-28
ion for each sample analysis from the
ide the standard deviation by the sample
100 to obtain the percent RSD. This
(%RSD) is a measure of the effect of
cess precision. If the sample
than fiv/ times the limit of detection
,2 and the %RSD for the sample value is greater
ag\the results with an asterisk "*" to denote a
the\ result.
July, L991
Page D-59/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No/^XX - Ambient Air
100
Eq. D/IN-29
where;
%RSD - % Relative Standard Deviation
<7n-i - Standard Deviation
x = Mean Sample Concentratioi
Calculate all method spike levels relative t6 the co/re/ponding unspiked
sample concentration in units of "
Calculate the relative percent difference (RP^^/or ,60th the method and
analysis duplicates. Calculate the RPD byM^iding^the absolute value of
the difference between the sample value and thV^dupli^ate value by their
mean and multiplying by 100.
RPD
where;
RPD
Relative
Eq. D/IN-30
S - First S
D = Second
4.6 BIBLIOGRAPHY
4.6.1 Winge, R.K., V
Plasma-Atomic Emissio
4.6.2 Winefordner, J.D.
Elements," Chemical^Analysis
4.6.3 Handbook/for.
Laboracori
4.6.4 Gar
Emission
Spectroscopy
4.6.5 Methods
, "Inductively Coupled
Prominent Lines," EPA-600/4-79-017.
•sis: Spectroscopic Methods for
. 41-42.
?
:rol in Water and Wastewater
SEPA Environmental Monitoring and Support
1979.
, H.E., "An Inductively-Coupled Plasma Atomic
r Routine Water Quality Testing," Applied
ysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020.
4.6.6 Annual Book of ASTM
dards. Part 31.
July, L991
Page D-60/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.6;7 "Carcinogens_- Working With Carcinogens," Deparcme
Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center f
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Aug. 1977.
4.6.8 "OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General I
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OS
1976) .
Health,
[sease Control,
Lication No. 77-206,
4.6.9 "Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratorie
Publications, Committee on Chemical Safety, 3;
4.6.10 "Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic
Trace Elements Analysis of Water and Waste
Inorganic Data/Protocol Review Committee/
Martin, EMSL/Cincinnati.
4.6.11 Federal Register 1978, 43 (Oct. 5), 46258^
1910) ,
.anuary
an Chemical
ition, 1979.
4.6.12 "Standard Operating Procedure^for Microwave Extrate
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/IN-1
INORGANICS IN AMBIENT AIR TARGET ANALYTE
LIST rJT
ontract
itation
Analvte
Cadmium
Arsenic
Chromium
Beryllium
Selenium
Lead
Barium
Manganese
Thallium
Zinc
Copper
Antimony
Cobalt
Nickel
Silver
Vanadium
Tin
Molybdenum
Aluminum
Calcium
Iron
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
CASRN
7440-43-9
7440-36-2
7440-47-3
7440-41-7
7782-49-2
7439-92-1
7440-39-3
7439-96-5
7440-28-0
7440-66-6
7440-50-8
7440-36-0
7440-48-4
1313-99-1
7440-22-
7440-62
7440-31>
7439-98-7
7429-90-5
7440-70-2
7439-89-6
7439-95-4
Required
Limit1-2-3
ue/L
18
7440^23-
(D
The analytical mepno
achieved method det
Quantitation Limit
only be used in t
iSt y must be utilized and the
tion limits shaltxsmeetv<'the Contract Required
(CRQL) i/eqiLJrreTBents^^ligher detection levels may
f o 1 low/ng /circumsbanc/
If the samples*jncerib3^ati/bn
instrument or method in use
instrument or instrument
required quan£-Lta^ion
documented! as described in
(2)
(3)
xceeds two times the detection limit of the
the value may be reported even though the
.ction limit may not equal the contract
method detection limit must be
ibits? D and E.
As
volumes
d detection limits (for metals) and the
ank values (for all other parameters)
od\blank preparations that must be met using
,nd E.
Hi-Vol filter and 40 mL final extract
ter 3, Section 3.7.1.4 for calculations.
Julv, 1991
Page D-62/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Arch Jen:
TABLE D/IN-2
RECOMMENDED WAVELENGTHS2 AND ESTIMATED/^
INSTRUMENTAL DETECTION LIMITS / /
Element
Wavelength, nm1
Detection
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
308.215
206.833
193.696
455.403
313.042
249.773
226.502
317.933
267.716
228.616
324.754
259.940
220.353
279^079
2
(1)
i/sted are/
Othe;
reotmunendiadbecause of their sensitivity and
wavelengthsimay be substituted if they can
The wavelength^ 1
overall accep/anc'
provide the ne&4ed s>asi/ivfty and are treated with the same corrective
techniques for spe-s^ral interference. The use of alternate wavelengths
shall be reported (irfxjra) w>th the sample data.
The escima-€e~d ins~t^jmentaPxietecbipn limits as shown are taken from
" Induct^velv__Ccmj>led Plasma-Absmicr Emission Spectroscopy-Prominent
Lines/ E/A-600/4^7^017\ They are given as a guide for an instrumental
limit?. ;ihe actual meChodNietection limits are sample dependent and may
vary as/the sample matrix varies.
(3) Hyghlyxdependent on operating conditions and plasma position.
(2)
Julv. L991
Page D-63/IN
-------
Exhibit: D
SOW No/^XXX - Ambient Air
TABLE D/IN-3
EXAMPLE OF ANALYTE CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENTS
FROM INTERFERENTS AT THE 100 MG/L
Interferent
Wavelength
Analyte
nm
Al
Cr
Cu
Fe /
Ni
Ti
Antimony 206.833
Arsenic 193.696
Barium 455.403
Beryllium 313.042
Boron
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
249.773
226.502
267.716
228.615
324.754
0.47
1.3
0.04
2.9
0.44
Lead 220.353 0.17
Manganese 257.610
Molybdenum 202.030
Nickel 231.604
Selenium 196.026
Thallium 190.864
Vanadium
Zinc
292.402
213.856
.25
0.45
1.1
0.04 0.05
0.04
0.03 0.15 --
0.05 0.02
002 0.002 --
0.005
0.02
,14
0.29
July, 1991
Page D-64/IN
-------
Exhibit D
_SOW No. XXX - Arabian- A
TABLE D/IN-4
INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE
July, 1991
Page D-65/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW Nfry XXX - AmMgnr A
FIGURE D/IN-1
TEMPLATE FOR CUTTING GLASS-FIBER E
July, 1991
Page D-66/IN
-------
Exhibit D
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
FIGURE D/IN-2
MICROWAVE DIGESTION SYSTEM
July, 1991
Page D-67/IN
-------
EXHIBIT E
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY C
July, 1991
-------
EXHIBIT E
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL REQU,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION /./... ./X E_2
SECTION 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLANS .../../...././ £.5
SECTION 3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES^. /^V . / £-8
SECTION 4 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY -^^X. • -^X E-15
SECTION 5 DOCUMENT CONTROL . . ^_^_ >X^- V E-18
SECTION 6 ANALYTICAL STANDARDS xtyuiiLe^ENTS . . r~:—?—^. E-22
SECTION 7 METHOD SPECIFIC QA/QC REQUIREMENTS '
7.1 Volatiles Collected in Canistefcs/ ./ E-27
7.2 Volatiles Collected on Tenax®\. . /. E-32
7.3 Semivolatiles/f^ ^N- • • • .\ X, E-37
7.4 Inorganics /. ./7~~>~. \ \ ' / E'42
SECTION 8 REGIONAL .DATA: REVIEW y . •S>>~-7 E-51
SECTION 9 LABORATORY 4yALUATION CAMPLES />/ £.52
SECTION 10 GC/MS
SECTION 11 ON-S]
E-54
JORATORYxEVALUA^IONS £.55
SECTION 12 JQUALPTY-SSSIIRANCXDATA
SECTION iy DyCTA MANAGEMENT
SECTION/14 ^-REFERENCES
ANALYSIS
E-58
£-60
E-62
July, 1991
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
are
Quality assurance (QA). and quality control (QC)
EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). The CLP QA p
management review and oversight at the planning, impl
completion stages of environmental data generation a
data provided are of the quality required. The CLP
program includes those activities required as part,
ensure that the data are of known and documented
During the planning of an environmental da/a
activities focus on defining data quality obj
designing a QC system to measure and documea
generated. During the implementation of th;
activities ensure that the QC system is f-
deficiencies uncovered by the QC system
environmental data are generated, QA actr
of data obtained to determine its suitabilit
remedial decisions.
jgral parts of
consists of
Ration, and
to ensure that
rol (QC)
to
>llection program,
and criteria, and
data that will be
colle'cti^n effort, QA
:ively, and that the
corrected. After
assessing the quality
support enforcement or
The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the over^l QA^QC operations
and the processes by which the CLP/mee~ts~--th£j3A/QC objectives/defined above.
This contract requires a variety o'f QA/gC activT&te-s-T-^Ihese contract
requirements are the minimum QA/QC^opexatioTts—necessary to~7satisfy the
analytical requirements associated withN^ie deterralHarteayof the different
method analytes. These operations arevdesdgnpd zo facilitate laboratory
comparison by providing the EPA with comparaele/data from all Contractors.
These requirements do not release the lab\rato^y from maintaining its own QC
checks on method and instrumeat^performance
Appropriate use of
conditions encountered
quality control proce
methods in this cont
received by the labj
validation of thes
for all samples collec
result from causes such a
human error.
indispensable.
Therefore
under the giteat range of analytical
ires reliance on the
orated into the methods. The
on/samples typical of those
:he CLP. However, the
/ot guarantee that they perform equally well
field conditions. Inaccuracies can
artifacts, equipment malfunctions, and
ontrol component of each method is
ta acquired frbTa qua}
The da
and evaluate analytical results
effect of/co/rective actions .\ Tli
results
precisi
indicators^"
include quantitative and
accuracy, detection/
ity control procedures are used to estimate
.nd to determine the necessity for or the
means used for evaluating the analytical
ualitative indicators of quality such as
lijfait, and other quantitative and qualitative
give an overview of the activities required
in an integratedorogijam to/generate environmental data of known and
documented qualityxvrsequit«id' to/meet defined objectives.
July, 1991
Page E - 3
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Necessary components of a complete QA/QC program incl/de^internal QC
criteria that demonstrate acceptable levels of performan/e, As determined bv
QA review. External review of data and procedures is a/complished by the '
monitoring activities of the National Program Office, Xegi£nal data users
Sample Management Office, NEIC, and EMSL/LV. Each ex/erna]>*eview
accomplishes a different purpose. These reviews are/de/c^ibedSn. specific
sections of this Exhibit. Performance evaluation s4mpXes p^ide^a^external
QA reference for the program. A laboratory on-si4 ^aluatiorT>ystemSs also
part of the external QA monitoring. A feedback /bvi/provides the re^u
the various review functions to the contract la/oratories through dire /
communications with the Administrative Project/Officers and Technical Protect
Officers. ' '
This Exhibit is not a guide to constru/tin£ qualicy assurance project
plans, quality control systems, or a qual/ty 4§suranc6 o/ganization. It is
however, an explanation of the quality cokt^ol ahdoualZty assurance
requirements of the CLP. It outlines some minimum standards for QA/QC
programs. It also includes specific items thatisce required in a QA Plan and
by the QA/QC documentation detailed in this contracth\Delivery of this
documentation provides the Agency with a complete datap-ackage^which will
stand alone, and limits the need foF^trrt€*c£__with the Cont^acjfor or with an
analyst, at a later date, if some tespectof thT~Htaiy&is__i.s questioned.
To ensure that the product deliv\redvby th& CaGSrsn&Mj/ meets the
requirements of the contract and to imfero've' inter/aboratory data comparison,
the Agency requires the following from Cfce
Development and imple
the key elements
described in Section
Preparation of
(SOPs) as des
Adherence
specified in
of aN^A program, and documentation of
rogram throug^ a written QA Plan, as
Exhibit>
Standard Operating Procedures
Ixhibit.
^I/methods and associated QC requirements
analyt
Verification of
of neat nta^erials^-and the^
from p/ivate—etiemicalHiouses
idards and documentation of the purity
;nd accuracy of solutions obtained
^naiVsis of laboratory performance evaluation
ence to corrective action procedures.
Submission
review.
July, 1991
laboratory evaluations, including adherence
ocedures.
data and pertinent documentation for Regional
Page E - 4
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Submission, upon request, of GC/MS tapes and applicable documentation
for tape audits.
Submission for Agency review of all original
during sample analyses.
tation generated
July, 1991
Page E - 5
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 2
. QUALITY ASSURANCE PLANS
The Contractor shall establish a quality assura
objective of providing sound analytical chemical m
shall incorporate the quality control procedures,
action, and all documentation required during dat
quality assessment measures performed by manage
production.
As evidence of such a program, the Cont
Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) which describ
implemented to achieve the following:
• Maintain data integrity, validity,
• Ensure that analytical measurement
acceptable state of stability and reproducibi
• Detect problems through da
action procedures which ke
with the
is program
tive
the
ta
:pare a written
that are
\
• Document all aspects of the m
data that are technically sound"1
The QAP must present, in specific ter
objectives, and specific Q.
quality requirements in tKis contr
each element shall be ipfcl
be available during On
the Administrative Pr
preparation of a QAP
2.1 ELEMENTS OF A
2.1.1 Contractor QA
2.1.2 Organization and
2.1.2/1 /QA
tained in an
orrective
reliable.
order to provide
y defensible."
te policies, organization,
igned to achieve the data
ble, SOPs pertaining to •
f t of the QAP. The QAP must
and upon written request by
information relevant to the
M publications12-4'.
.nd/QA Responsibilities; and
onships.
2.1.2.2 Personnel
• Resumes;
July, 1991
Page E - 6
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Education and Experience Pertinent to this Contract; and
Training Progress.
2.1.3 Facilities and Equipment
Instrumentation and Backup Alternatives;
• Maintenance Activities and Schedules.
2.1.4 Document Control
• Laboratory Notebook Policy;
Sample Tracking/Custody Procedure^
Logbook Maintenance and Archivi
Case File Organization, Preparation
Procedures for Preparation, Approval,
Distribution of SOPs ; and
• Process for Revision of
2.1.5 Analytical Methodology
• Calibration Procedures and F:
Sample Preparation/Extraction
Sample Analysi
Standards P
• Decision
Correct!
Procedures;
ision, and
-^y
intation Procedures.
.esponsibility for Initiation of
Proce
2.1.6 Data Generation
Data
Data Keduction^roce^ures;
Validation Procedures; and
irization Procedures.
». - " 7 /
2.1.7 Quality\Conti
Solvent, Reagent"and' Adsorbent Check Analysis;
July, 1991
Page E - 7
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Reference Material Analysis;
Internal-QC Checks;
Corrective Action and Determination of QC
• Responsibility Designation.
2.1.8 Quality Assurance Program Assessment
Data Audits;
• Systems Audits;
Performance Audits;
Corrective Action Procedures; and
• QA Reporting Procedures.
July, 1991
Page E - 8
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 3
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
In order to obtain reliable results, adherence
methodology is imperative. In any operation that
basis, reproducibility is best accomplished thro
Operating Procedures (SOPs) . As defined by the
document that provides directions for the step
operation, analysis, or action which is commo
performing certain routine or repetitive
nalytical
etitive
ta
SOPs prepared by the Contractor must
comprehensive, up-to-date, and sufficien
results by qualified analysts. All SOPs,
reflect activities as they are currently perfo
addition, all SOPs must:
• Be consistent with current
contract's requirements3•*•*
• Be consistent with instrumen
manuals;
Be available to the EPA during an\0n
complete set of SOPs shall be boun
inspection at such
laboratory personal ma
the SOPs;
as the method for
.e., clear,
to/permit duplication of
to the Agency, must
he laboratory. In
and the CLP
ecific instruction
Provide for t
complete to rf
protocol;
Describe the mec
by the Contractor
results;
Descr
ana
Laboratory Evaluation. A
and available for
-Site evaluations,
monstrate the application of
:umentafeion that is sufficiently
tasks required by the
• Be ar
situatiorT
• Be available at
demonstrating the validity of data reported
ing the cause of missing or inconsistent
measures/and feedback mechanism used when
meet protocol requirements;
ipdated as necessary when contract,
icedural modifications are made;
'erence in usability or evidentiary
ic work stations as appropriate; and
July, 1991
Page E - 9
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
• Be subject to a document control procedure which p/ec^udes the use of
outdated or inappropriate SOPs.
tivity for
sections must
econdary
laborato
proced
be avil
are
3.1 SOP FORMAT
3.1.1 The format for SOPs may vary depending upon tfhe /IciBd of~
which they are prepared. However, at a minimum, tfle £6llowii
be included:
• Title Page;
• Scope and Application;
• Definitions;
• Procedures;
• QC Acceptance Criteria;
• Corrective Action Procedures^Including Procedure
Review of Information Being/
• Documentation Description a
• Miscellaneous Notes and Precaut?
• References.
3.3 SOPS REQUIRED
3.3.1 The Contractor
maintenance of custod;
analysis of samples, /an<
/ •
3.3.2 Specif icationsfor^
eceipt of samples,
ntificatioh^sample storage, tracking the
of/comp^i^ted
li/tiga^ion
d
used
shall ha"
fenyStandard Operating Procedures
^s a written narrative step-by-step
procedures including examples of
je SOPs must accurately describe the actual
laboratbxyyand copies of the written SOPs shall
;>riate laboratory personnel. These procedures
analytical data produced under this
(use in EPA enforcement case preparation and
s SOPs shall provide mechanisms and
if the following specifications and shall be
laboratory evidence audits. The Contractor
operating procedures (SOPs) for:
• Sample recerp-c and logging;
July, 1991
Page E - 10
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
• Sample storage;
• Preventing sample contamination;
• Security for laboratory and samples;
• Traceability of standards;
• Maintaining instrument records and logb
• Sample analysis and data control syst/sms
• Glassware cleaning;
• Technical and managerial review
package preparation;
• Internal review of contractually-r
quality control data for each individual
ility assurance and
package;
• Sample analysis, data handling, and reporting^
• Chain-of-Custody;
• Evidentiary SOP;
• Laboratory Data Validation/LabNarab^ry/Self Inspection System; and
Data flow and chain-of-command, fory data review.
Procedures ^or/sreasuririg precision artci accuracy.
/ / > ^>\ \7
Evaluation parameters for identifying systematic errors9.
Proced
requi
SOW Exhi
and diskette deliverables (if
and compliant with the requirements in
hardcopy deliverables are in agreement
tte deliverables, if required.
^of internal QA inspection procedure (demonstrated
on personal notebooks, internal PE
Evidentiary ^
Written Standard Opera^
July, 1991
are discussed in Exhibit F, "Specification for
Procedures"
Page E - 11
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Frequency and type of internal audits (e.g./ random, quarterly,
spot_checks, perceived trouble areas).
• Demonstration of problem identification
resumption of analytical processing.
internal audit (i.e., QA feedback).
• Documentation of audit reports, (i
response, corrective action, etc.
Data Management and Handling
• Procedures for controlling a;
actions and
uiting from
Procedures for reviewing ch4nges
ensuring traceability of upda
Lifecycle management p-rocedures for
implementing changes to existing computii
hardware, software, ajid—documentation or ins
Database security, b
recovery from system
a entry errors.
d deliverables and
• System maintenance proce
• Individuals(s) responsible fc
data integrit
• Specifica
• Document co,
3.3.2.2 The Centra
responsible for
his/her duties and
3.3.2.3 T
in of th
docume
modifying and
is including
ng new systems.
res including
id Response time.
tern operation, maintenance,
lave a designated sample custodian
imples and have written SOPs describing
iilities.
informa
written SOPs for receiving and logging
hall include but not be limited to
on:
vof\EPA chain-of-custody forms;
lirbills or airbill stickers;
Pre^se_nce ~bx. absence' of/EPA Traffic Reports or SAS packing lists;
• Presence c5rs^ absence /of custody seals on shipping and/or sample
containers and tits'ir condition;
July, 1991
Page E - 12
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Custody seal numbers, when present;
Presence or absence of sample tags;
• Sample tag ID numbers;
• Condition of the shipping container;
• Condition of the sample container;
• Verification of agreement or nonagre«
receiving documents and sample cont^
• Resolution of problems or discrep^
Office; and
The definition of any terms us«
receipt.
of information
with/the? Sample Management
Lbe/sample condition upon
shal]
3.3.2.4 The Contractor shall have written SOrSKfor
security of samples after log-in and shall demons
sample storage and laboratory
descriptions of all storage area£
steps taken to prevent sample
list of authorized personnel
areas.
3.3.2.5 The Contractor shall have
performed on any particular^ sample.
following:
Lntenance of the
:urity of the
:ifically. include
the laboratory, and
shall include a
/to secure storage
SOPs for tracking the work
acking SOP shall include the
A description o
sample stor
analyses;
A description
calibration
Examples of the do~
in th^^s ampTe--£§c. e ip t;
an
ion usWl/to record sample receipt,
ample preparations, and sample
/umentation used to record instrument
#A/QC activities; and
jrmats and laboratory documentation used
storage, sample transfer, and sample
July, 1991
1 have written SOPs for maintaining
; throughout the laboratory.
signs unique laboratory identifiers, written
tion of the method used to assign the unique
'ross-reference to the EPA sample number.
Page E - 13
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.3.2.8 If the Contractor uses prefixes or suffixes An .addition to
sample identification numbers, the written SOPs sha/1 i/nclude their
definitions.' -The Contractor shall have written SO/s describing the
method by which the laboratory maintains samples ,unde4: custody.
3.3.2.9 The Contractor shall have written SOPs/fo.r' <5*ganiz"as&4on and
assembly of all documents relating to each EP^/Case, inctudj-ng^chnical
and managerial review. Documents shall be fiSLeo/on a
basis. The procedures must ensure that all/cJbsuments including^
pages, sample tracking records, chromatographiJc charts, computer
printouts, raw data summaries, correspondency, and any other written
documents having reference to the Case are corn-pi.led/in, one location for
submission to EPA. The system must include a document!: numbering and
inventory procedure.
3.3.2.10 The Contractor shall have
>r laboratory safety.
3.3.2.11 The Contractor shall have written "SOPs for\cleaning of
glassware used in preparing and analyzing sample&xunderx^his contract.
3.3.2.12 The Contractor shaljf have
used in sample analysis QA/QC
3.4 HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL
£or traceability of standards
3.4.1 A Contractor conducting work undeV tMs .contract may receive EPA-
designated confidential information from ohe Agency. Confidential information
must be handled separately^frrjnr-Qther documentation developed under this
contract. To accomplish/this, theNfollowing^proc^dures for the handling of
confidential informatiori hatfeTJe^n established\
Jocuments/
3.4.2 All confidentis
designated Document ^ongrol Offi
the supervision of a
ccJnfidenti
prma
3.4.3 Any samples
shall be handled as
maintained to store this 11
nonconfidential information.
be treated
logs these
then made
out to
file at tzhe Conclusion
be reptfoduoed except upon
will ent>
information"
Officer. Tl
information
disposition
on/received with a request of confidentiality
A separate locked file shall be
jn and shall be segregated from other
grated from confidential samples shall
of confidential information, the DCO
nfidentirial Inventory Log. The information is
personnel but only after it has been signed
e documents shall be returned to the locked
king day. Confidential information may not
1 by the EPA Contracting Officer. The DCO
.uraent control system. In addition, this
except upon approval by the EPA Contracting
nd retain the cover page of any confidential
year and shall keep a record of the
Inventory Log.
July, 1991
Page E - 14
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.5 SOPS DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS
r
3.5.1 Within forty-five (45) days of contract receipt,/a c/mplete set of SOPs
relevant to this contract shall be sent to the Technics
and EMSL/LV. Also, during the term of performance of/
SOPs which have been amended or new SOPs which have
to the Technical Project Officer, EMSL/LV (quality
(evidentiary SOPs).
oject Officer, SMO
contract, copies of
Jen shall be sent
) and NEIC
July, 1991
Page E - 15
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambienc Air
from the
ffort is
llowing
eking
SECTION 4
" • CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
A sample is physical evidence collected from
environment. An essential part of hazardous waste
that the evidence gathered be controlled. To ace
sample identification, chain-of-custody, sample
procedures have been established.
4.1 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
4.1.1 To ensure traceability of samples while/in possession of the
Contractor, the Contractor shall have a specified metinod/for maintaining
identification of samples throughout the ^laboSsa^ory./
4.1.2 Each sample and sample preparation container sl^all be labeled with the
EPA number or a unique laboratory identifier. Ir^-a unib^ae laboratory
identifier is used, it shall be cross-referenced to the EPANq.uraber.
4.2 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES
4.2.1 Because of the nature of the'
samples must be traceable from the
are introduced as evidence in legal pffc
procedures ensuring that EPA sample cust
sample is under custody if the following
e custody of EPA
llected until they
The Contractor shall have
;aintained and documented. A
• It is in your pos
It is in your v,
• It was in yo
• It is in a
authorized pers
4.3 SAMPLE RECE
4.3.1 The
receiving
4.3.2
the evejit
4.3.3 The
inspected upon
4.3.4 The condition^
inspected upon receipt by
ession, or
it up, or
e area (secure areas shall be accessible to
sample custodian responsible for
late a representative to receive samples in
sdikn is not available.
containers and sample bottles shall be
>ie smple custodian or his/her representative.
Zustody seals (intact/not intact) shall be
sample custodian or his/her representative.
July, 1991
Page E - 16
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
4.3.5 The sample custodian or his/her representative shall check for the
presence or absence of the following documents accompany2ng>the sample
shipment: "' •
• Airbills or airbill stickers;
• Custody seals;
• EPA custody records;
• EPA traffic reports or SAS packing lis
• Sample tags.
4.3.6 The sample custodian or his/her re
forms (e.g., custody records, traffic rej^or
accompanying the samples at the time of
4.3.7 The Contractor shall contact SMO to resc
such as absent documents', conflicting information^
unsatisfactory sample condition (e.g., leaking sample^
4.3.8 The Contractor shall record
problems on Telephone Contact Logk.
4.3.9 The following information shal
by the sample custodian or his/her rep:
• Condition of the shi
• Presence or abserice
sample containers;
11 sign and date all
lists, and airbills)
^epancies and problems
ustody seals, and
discrepancies and
on appropriate Form AADC-1
fe as samples are received and inspected:
y seals on shipping and/or
Sampl
numbers;
July, 1991
•ties;
r^bills or airbill stickers;
:s;
sEPA custody records;
traffic reports or SAS packing lists;
tiple tags;
ition numbers cross-referenced to the EPA sample
Page E - 17
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
• Verification of agreement or non-agreement of infibrm/tion recorded on
shipping .documents and sample containers; and
• Problems or discrepancies.
4.4 SAMPLE TRACKING PROCEDURES
4.4.1 The Contractor shall maintain records
handling from receipt to final analysis. The
documentation of the movement of samples and
designated laboratory storage areas.
all phass, of
ds shall include
samples into andbt of
July, 1991
Page E - 18
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 5
DOCUMENT CONTROL
The goal of the laboratory document control program ^s to assure that all
documents for a specified Sample Delivery Group (SDG/ will^be accounted for
when the project is completed. Accountable documents u§fedby&*xntract
laboratories shall include but not be limited to Logbofoks, Ckain-~oN&*custody
records, sample work sheets, bench sheets, and ot^r/documents^telatijlx to the
sample or sample analyses. The following docume^n^eontrol procedures havfe
been established to assure that all laboratory,
stored for delivery to the EPA or are available upon request from the EPA
prior to the delivery schedule.
5.1 PREPRINTED LABORATORY FORMS AND LOGBOQ&S
5.1.1 All documents produced by the Contractor
the preparation and analysis of EPA samplessfaall becme
EPA and shall be placed in the complete sample
observations and results recorded by the laboratoryNjut
laboratory forms shall be entered into permanent laborat
all data from a SDG are compiled,
all SDG-related logbook entries s^alljae include*
package.
Lnal laboratory
directly related to
the property of the
roup file (CSF). All
on preprinted
books. When
and copies of
documentation
5.1.2 The Contractor shall identify t!
documents which is directly related to
samples.
/recorded on all laboratory
iration and analysis of EPA
5.1.3 Pre-printed laborat
and be dated (month/day/yea
performing the activity at/the tfjpe
formsxshalL coriXain\the name of the laboratory
signed by tne person responsible for
ivity\iy performed.
5.1.4 Logbook entries' si
responsible for perforr
ill be d^ted^nio>k^h/day7year) and signed by the person
the actvvity at ch«/tirae an activity is performed.
5.1.5 Logbook entries-shall"
with the exception of insl
only one SDG per page.
5.1.6 Pages
5.1.7 Inst,
of the r
provide
exercis&^the
numbers in
client names
chronological order. Entries in logbooks,
run logs and extraction logs, shall include
unbourtd^lpgbooks shall be sequentially numbered.
e maintained so as to enable a reconstruction
instruments. Because the laboratory must
un logs to the EPA, the laboratory may
lyj laboratory or EPA sample identification
rather than government agency or commercial
confidentiality of commercial clients.
July, 1991
Page E - 19
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
5.1.8 Corrections to supporting documents and raw data shall/be made by
drawing a single line through the error and entering the/co/rect information.
Corrections and additions to supporting documents and /aw Aata shall be dated
and initialed. No information shall be obliterated o/ rendered unreadable.
All notations shall be recorded in ink. Unused port/ons of ctecuments shall be
"z'd" out.
5.2 CONSISTENCY OF DOCUMENTATION
5.2.1 The Contractor shall assign a document /onjTrol officer responsibtB/for
the organization and assembly of the CSF.
5.2.2 All copies of laboratory documents ^nal/ be comp/lej?e and legible.
control officer
e tags, custody
and other relevant
le or sample
5.2.3 Before releasing analytical result^,
shall assemble and cross-check the informa
records, lab bench sheets, personal and instr
data to ensure that data pertaining to each parti
delivery group is consistent throughout the CSF.
5.3 DOCUMENT NUMBERING AND INVENT
5.3.1 In order to provide document\acc\3untaEiTrity_Qf_the Completed analysis
records, each item in a CSF shall be Vnve^itori/d /nd assTgned a serialized
number as described in Exhibit B, Sectipn
CSF # - Region - Serialized numbe
5.3.2 All documents relevant to e^tch sample ^delivery group, including
logbook pages, bench sheets/mass, spfectra, chromat^grams, screening records,
re-preparation records/ re/analysas recorclSs. records of failed or attempted
analysis, custody records7, libr / res^ajch remits, etc., shall be
inventoried.
75-2-0240).
5.3.3 The Document
that all documents gene
delivered to the EPA. The
the file. Figur§>-t—ts—an ex
(DCO) shall be responsible for ensuring
placed in the CSF for inventory and are
place the sample tags in plastic bags in
document inventory.
July, 1991
Page E - 20
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Document Control #*
232-2-0001
232-2-0002
232-2-0003
232-2-0004
232-2-0005
232-2-0006
232-2-0007
232-2-0008
etc.
Figure 1
Example
DOCUMENT INVENTORY
Document Type
Case File Document Invi
Chain-of-Custody Reco
Shipping Manifests
Sample Tags
SMO Inorganics Tra
Inorganics Analys
Analysts' Notebo
ICP and AA Instr
etc.
5.5
SHIPPING DAT.
*This number is to be recorded on eacfo s
5.4 STORAGE OF EPA FI
5.4.1 The Contractor/shall marital
location.
documents in a secure
5.5.1 The Contracto^xshal^dootiment shipment of deliverables packages to
the recipients. These sfripments\require custody seals on the containers
placed such thatthej_cannotNae opened without damaging or breaking the seal.
The Contractors-shall dotaqient wfraj^was^ent, to whom, the date, and the method
(carrier) us
5.5.2 TKe
Region 1
5.5.3
and the S
ur^ge the CSF deliverable to the appropriate EPA
submission.
letter for the CSF will be sent to the NEIC
July, 1991
Page E - 21
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
5.5.4 The Document Control form is used to document thj
inspection of shipping containers and samples. The Con*
one (1) original FORM AADCrl for each shipping contaii
5.5.5 The Contractor shall sign and date the airbj
the shipping containers, record the presence or
their conditions.
5.5.6 The Contractor shall note any problems
the instructions explained in Exhibit B, Samp]
5.5.7 The Contractor shall submit a comple4ec
each SDG package.
eipt and
or shall submit
examine
seals and
July, 1991
Page E - 22
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 6
ANALYTICAL STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS,
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will
reference standards either for direct analytical me
purpose of traceability. All contract laboratories/wi
prepare from neat materials, from cylinders of co
NIST Standard Reference Materials or NIST/EPA ap
material, or purchase from private chemical sup
necessary to successfully and accurately perform £he analyses require
protocol.
y analytical
or for the
to
eable to
nee
this
6.1 PREPARATION OF CHEMICAL STANDARDS FRC
MATERIAL
iffi NEAT HIGH7 PURITY BULK
6.1.1 A laboratory may prepare their ch«micalN§tahda^ds from neat
materials. Commercial sources for neat chernioal standards pertaining to
analytes listed on the TAL are given in AppendiitxC of ci^e "Quality Assurance
Materials Bank: Analytical Reference Standards," Seventh Edition, January
1988. Laboratories should obtain the highest purity pbs^ibleNwhen purchasing
neat chemical standards; s tandards/ptrrcfeaagdat less thanS^j/ purity must be
documented as to why a higher puraty could not~~Be—obtained.
6.1.2 Neat chemical standards mustxbe\kept r/efrXgeTaeed/when not being used
in the preparation of standard solutions \ Pr/ope^r storage of neat chemicals is
essential in order to safeguard them fr$m decomposition.
6.1.3 The purity of a com'
chemical supply house. S^fnce kna
concentration of solute An
laboratory's responsibility to haVe
the purity of each cocnpouTid is co,
performed, should us/e either
chromatography with/florae ionij
chromatography,
of two or more independent
impurity when weighing nea< mate
is:
can somerunes\be misrepresented by a
edge of p\iri
,uti^n standar
tical
detect
is needed to calculate the
i is the contract
.cvcumentation ascertaining that
Purity confirmation, when
ng calorimetry, gas
high performance liquid
try, or other appropriate techniques. Use
s is recommended. The correction factor for
ials in the preparation of solution standards
of
ire compound
. of pure compound Eq. E-l
/ percent purity •,
100
where "ws
of a so]
of pure compound" is that required to prepare a specific volume
standard of a snecilfied concentration.
6.1.4 Mi^identification of' compounds occasionally occurs and it is
possible that^misi^tieled tfonraound may be received from a chemical supply
house. It is the^contrais^/laboratory's responsibility to have analytical
documentation confirming that/ all compounds used in the preparation of
July, 1991
Page E - 23
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
solution standards are correctly identified. Identification /confirmation,
when performed, should use GC/MS analysis on at least tw/5 different analytical
columns, or other appropriate techniques.
a specified
6.1.5 Calculate the weight of material to be weighed out
volume taking into account the purity of the compourfcl an^the
concentration. A second person must verify the accuracy ofthe calTfcvdations .
Check balances for accuracy with a set of s tandardvWights . All>«eighb
should be performed on an analytical balance to
verified by a second person. The solvent used /to
be compatible with the protocol in which the sta
solute should be soluble, stable, and nonreaotiv
case of a multicomponent solution, the compone
other.
.nearest 0.1 mg at
dissolve the solute si
ird is to be used; the
with tKevjsolvent. In the
s must /notreact with each
6.1.6 Transfer the solute to a volume trhxflaskxa/d dilute to the specified
solution volume with solvent after ensuring dr&solution of the solute in the
solvent. Sonication or warming may be performedco pronto^e dissolution of the
solute. This solution is to be called the primary sfcandard^and all subsequent
dilutions must be traceable back to the primary standarc
yd anc
6.1.7 Log notebooks are to be k
subsequent dilutions from the primaXy s^andarTJ-^nd J:he
determining their concentrations are
person. All solution standards are to\pe
solution standards are to be clearly lab
compound or compounds, concentration, dat
the preparer.
6.2 PREPARATION OF GASEOUS
dilutions. All
lations for
ified by a second
^f/ig^rated when not in use. All
to the identity of the
prepared, solvent, and initials of
6.2.1 As discussed in
gaseous standards in/a
to a National
or to a NIST/EPA ap'proved
may be purchased in one"
gaseous standards preparat
3.2. For these alternate
Contractor thr
must be able/to yerTfy—t£iat
certificate/ of/analysis
request.
6.3
bit D, Section 1.4>4v^_the Contractor may prepare
lie didution system from compressed gases traceable
Standards (NIST) sWndard Reference Material (SRM)
Reference Material (CRM). The components
linger/or separate cylinders. Other methods of
are^xiescribed in Exhibit D, Sections 3.1 and
equivalence must be established by the
iidit pr-acedur'a. In either method, the Contractor
^ stanclarjas are certified. Manufacturer's
t tte retained by the Contractor and presented upon
6.3.1
Contractors pro
S IN SOLUTION
analytical Reference standards can be purchased by
Lded^thev meet the following criteria.
6.3.1.1 Labor at orie
the integrity of the
aintain the following documentation to verify
rd solutions they purchase:
July, 1991
Page E - 24
-------
•Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
• Mass spectral identification confirmation of the neat material;
• Purity confirmation of the neat material; and
• Chromat'ographic and quantitative documentatio
standard was QC checked according to the
at the solution
6.3.1.2 The Contractor must purchase standards
demonstrated statistically and analytically by
choice. One way this can be demonstrated is
solutions; a high standard, a low standard,
concentration (see parts a and b below). The /Supplier must then
demonstrate that the analytical results feir phe high /standard and low
standard are consistent with the differe/ce Au theoretical concentrations.
This is done by the Student's t-test in/pa/t "d" wj/icb/follows . If this is
achieved, the supplier must then demonstrate that/the' concentration of the
target standard lies midway between theconc^tr/ticms of the low and high
standards. This is done by the S tudent^sx^- test irt part E. Thus the
standard is certified to be within 10 percent^of tfie^target concentration.
6.3.1.3 If the procedure above is used, the supplied
following have been achieved.
nust (iocument that the
Two solutions of identical
independently from neat
must be diluted to the intend
standard"). One aliquot is taen
diluted to a concentration ten
standard. This is called the "hij
is taken from the/^econd>solution
percent less th
standard";
Six replicat
be performe
standard,
(a total of 18 analyses) must
low standard, target, high
rget standard, high standard; and
prepared
the first solution
tion (the "target
second solution and
greater than the target
.ndard". One further aliquot
uted to a concentration 10
s is called the "low
The-mean-and var
calculated.
the six results for each solution must be
Y6) /6
- (6 x Mean)2
Eq. E-2
E_3
T
eac
designa
target, an<
Additionally,
represent the results of the six analyses of
if. the low, target, and high standards are
''respectively. The variances of the low,
iar^s are designated Vlt V2, and V3, respectively.
Variance, Vp, is calculated.
July, 1991
Page E - 25
-------
Exhibit £
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
VP =
If che square root of Vp is less than one percen
/10.000 is to be used as the value of Vp in all '
The test statistic must be calculated:
TEST STATISTIC - |(M3 /l.l) - (Ml
If the test statistic exceeds 2.13 then
demonstrate a twenty percent difference/becween the high and low
standards. In such a case, the standa/ds/are not/afcseptable.
The test statistic must be calculat
TEST STATISTIC = JM2 - (Mt
Eq. E-4
M2, then M22
quent calculations.
E-5
If the test statistic exceeds 2.13, the sup
demonstrate that the target standard concentra
high and low standards. In s;uc_h_ a case, the stani
acceptable.
The 95 percent confidence int^rv,
must be calculated:
INTERVAL FOR LOW STANDARD \-
INTERVAL FOR
INTERVAL
Eq. E-6
These intervals
supplier has
percent diffe
not acceptable^
quality of the sti
6.4 REQUESTING
failed to
between the
e not
It of each standard
Eq. E-7
Eq. E-8
Eq. E-9
Lap is observed, then the
Llity to discriminate the 10
such a case, the standards are
, the laboratory is responsible for the
nployed for analyses under this contract.
STANDARDS REPOSITORY
(2.13)(Vp
± (2.13)(Vp
.13)(Vp
6.4.1 Solucions-^or~~atia4.ytical reference materials can be ordered from the
U.S. EPA Ch/mic^a! StandaroVRepesitory, depending on availability. The
Contractor/carl place an order^ fok standards only after demonstrating that
these standa/ds are not available\ from commercial vendors either in solution
or as a Aieacxmaterial.
6.5 DOCUMENTATIOtKQF THE VERIFICATION AND PREPARATION OF CHEMICAL STANDARDS
6.5.1 It is the rs^ponsteili/ty of each laboratory to maintain the necessary
documentation to show tkat the chemical standards they have used in the
performance of CLP analysrs-yconform to the requirements previously listed.
July, 1991
Page E - 26
-------
Exhibit E
SOW N'o. XXX - Ambient Air
Weighing logbooks, calculations, chromatograms, mass spec
prpduced by the laboratory or purchased from chemical
maintained by the' laboratory and may be subject to
inspection visits. Documentation of standards prepara
be sent to EPA for verification of contract complian
the documentation is supportive of the analytical r
sent to EPA, such documentation is to be kept on fi
a period of one year.
;a, etc, whether
houses, must be
iring on-site
may be required to
those cases where
packages
for
Page E -
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
ions
SECTION 7
METHOD SPECIFIC QA/QC REQUII
7.1 VOLATILES COLLECTED IN CANISTERS
This sections is to outline the minimum quality/control (QCXpperl
necessary to satisfy the analytical requirements^ssyciated withtbe
determination of the volatile organic target coroooi
using the procedures in Exhibit D, Section 1 fc
canisters. This section is not intended as a/comprehensive quality control
document, but rather as a guide to the specificyQC operations that must be
considered for volatile analyses using this/meohod. At/a Minimum, the
laboratory is expected to address these op/ratfions in/preparing the quality
assurance plan discussed in Section 2 andAtariaard Operating Procedures
discussed in Section 3.
The specific QC operations that must be considered foV>5jplatiles analysis
include the following:
• Canister Cleaning and Certif
• GC/MS Mass Calibration and lo
GC/MS Initial and Continuing Calfc
Sample Analysis;
• Internal Standard R^sponsjes a
• Method Blank Ana
Performance Ev,
7.1.1 Canister Clean
7.1.1.1 Prior to the in
the laborato
use, the
clean the
cleanliness
la'
of any canister in an analytical scheme,
nliness of the canister. Before each
veriry-s£hat>the canister is leak-free and shall
ze a san^/le of humidified zero air to verify
ified clean before initial use as outlined
J2.2.8. Results documenting initial
brm VII-AAVC, Canister Certification.
7.1.1.3 Befol
to the procedure!
1.2.2.5, or alterna^J
July, 1991
th0 laboratory must clean each canister according
e criteria described in Exhibit D, subsection
Canisters cleaned and
subsection 1.2.2.6.
Page E - 28
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
stored more than one month before use must be recleanedthrough one cycle
tof the standard three-cycle cleaning procedure; however/Sio subsequent
analytical confirmation of cleanliness is required beTor,/ use.
7.1.1.4 As a blank check of the canister(s) cleanup procedure, the final
humid zero air fill of 100% of the canisters must/be analyzed until the
cleanup system and canisters are proven reliable/as/bvtlinlhL in Exhibit D
Section 1.2.
7.1.1.5 Only canisters determined to be leak^ft^e according
procedures and criteria described in Exhibit/D/Section 1.2.2.7
used by the laboratory in sampling and a.r\a.Yjsi/s under this SOW.
7.1.2 GC/MS Mass Calibration and Ion Abunda/ce/Pattern$
7.1.2.1 Before analysis of samples, b/anl^s, or s/andards, the laboratory
must demonstrate that a given GC/MS system nteets/th/ instrument performance
check standard specified in Exhibit D, Se^ionT. 4/5 .4. The purpose of
this instrument performance check is to ensure corWct mass calibration,
mass resolution, and mass transmission. This i^vaccomHished through the
analysis of bromofluorobenzene (BFB).
7.1.2.2 BFB analysis (once ev/ry 12 hours~~oTr~e^ch_GC/MS system) is
described in detail in Exhibit\, ^ctiofi^L 4. 5 .4.
7.1.2.3 The key ions produced durli
respective ion abundance criteria mi
Section 1.4.5.4.4.
Lg\he /na/ysis of BFB and their
'me/t. as outlined in Exhibit D
7.1.2.4 The documentat
Instrument Performance Ct
me
ides repor>ting\data on Form IV-AAVC, GC/MS
and\Mass Calibration.
7.1.3 GC/MS Initial C«=
Compounds
f 1 ^\ \ /
Lib/ation fir Target^Sqmpounds and System Monitoring
7.1.3.1 Prior &D the^an^aly^
instrument performance
initially calibrated
linearity of response uti]
compound staiKlardsT
mil
7.1.3.2
compounds
as des/ri
standards are
given in
/ —
>f samples and required blanks, and after
have been met, the GC/MS system must be
of five concentrations to determine the
jxget compound and system monitoring
ions\of the initial standards for volatile target
monitoring compounds are 2, 5, 10, 20, and 100 ppbv,
Section 1.4.4.3.2.
o be analyzed according to the procedures and
ixhibit D, Part 1A, Section 4.6.
July, 1991
Page E - 29
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.1.3.4 The relative response factors (RRFs) are dete/miried according to
the procedures in Exhibit D, Section 1.4.6.4, using the Assignment of
internal standards to target compounds and system monitoring compounds
given in Exhibit D, Section 1.4.3.3.3, and Tables ]/anoS2^. The
documentation includes reporting data on Form V-A#VC./
7.1.3.5 The calibration of the GC/MS is evali
magnitude and stability of the relative respoi
target compound and system monitoring compour
compound in the initial calibration and the '
deviation (%RSD) across all five points
Exhibit D, Section 1.4.6.4.4.
fed/on the
factors
'The minimum RRF otxeact
Sent relative standard
the Criteria given in
7.1.3.6 The documentation includes repyo'rt^ng data.,
data system printout for the analysis
the mass spectrum of each target compounoXand
7.1.4 GC/MS Continuing Calibration for Target Cc
Compounds
rorm V-AAVC, a GC/MS
Lbration standard, and
monitoring compound.
Monitoring
7.1.4.1 Once the GC/MS system
verified each twelve (12) hour
las been
:ed, the
for each
.ibration must be
system.
7.1.4.2 The standard is to be analyze"*! accofrdidg to^tKe procedures and at
the frequency given in Exhibit D, Seb±io\i i. 4A, using Form V-AAVC to
report results.
7.1.4.3 The continuing/c'aliEr^i.on of thX^GC)cause\the quantitative determination of volatile
compound/ by7these procettures\is based on the use of internal standards
added immediately prior to\analysis.
7.1.5/2 Ttve specific compounds! used as internal standards are given in
Section 1.4.4.3^3. /The concentration of each internal standard
in the samp-le ana^zed by-GC/MS must be 10 ppbv.
7.1.5.3 The retention cime/and the selected ion current profile (SICP) of
each internal standabi.mus/t be monitored for all analyses.
July, 1991
Page E - 30
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.1.5.4 The area response of each internal standard f?£m the SICP and the
.retention time of the internal standard are evaluated/foy stability,
according to the procedures in Exhibit D, Section l-A.6/4.6. The area of
the internal standard in a sample must not vary by .mores than a factor ±40
percent from the area of the same internal standard iz( the associated
continuing calibration standard. Likewise, the yetenticJTL time of an
internal standard must be within ±0.50 minutes /X 3Q/s^aconds>vof its
retention time in the continuing calibration standard. ^"I^ternaS,^standard
areas and retention times are reported on Forni Vy-AAVC.
7.1.6 Sample Analysis
7.1.6.1 The GC/MS must be set up per re
1.4.5 and meet BFB instrument performan
7.1.6.2 The internal standard must b
Exhibit D, Section 1.4.6.4.
7.1.6.3 Guidelines for qualitative verifica
in Exhibit D, Section 1.4.8, and outlined belowT
Ixhibit D, Section
bration criteria.
.centration outlined in
be met as discussed
7.1.6.3.1 All ions preseEft^Trr-eheL^tandard mass s>e/tra at a.relative
intensity greater than 10 percent (mostaDTmdaat_j.on in the spectrum
equals 100 percent) must be^presfint~^m--the sample spectrum.
7.1.6.3.2 The relative intertsltres c/f i/bns must agree within ±20
percent between the standard-and^sampie sfpectra as specified in Exhibit
D, Section 1.4.8.1. (Example: For. an ion with an abundance of 50
percent in the standaj^-s^ectra, the\cor^esponding sample abundance must
be between 30 and 1/Q percem
7.1.6.3.3 lo
present in the
the analyst makin
favor false posi
must be reported
report the actu
.atvTCr^p£rcent\ifi the sample spectrum but not
trum mustNl^econsidered and accounted for by
the comparirsonNxThe Aerification process should
ive. Al/t cj&mpounds^^mWting the identification criteria
wtth their/spectra. For all compounds below the CRQL
valuVtoAlowed by a "J", e.g., "3J."
7.1.6.4 Guidelines for
Exhibit D, xS^ctionTTr4^8 .2 a
7.1
/e identification as presented in
led below:
ensities of major ions in the reference
tlian 10 percent of the most abundant ion) should
ectrum.
The relative Intensities of the major ions should agree
witnsto+20^>ercent. (pcample: For an ion with an abundance of 50
percent^af the^standa/d spectra, the corresponding sample ion abundance
must be between 30x4Zid 1/Q percent.)
July, 1991
Page E - 31
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.1.6.4.3 Molecular ions present in reference s/ec^ura should be
present in.sample spectrum.
7.1.6.4.4- Ions present in the sample spectrum butNwt in the
reference spectrum should be reviewed for posslblexbackb?Qund
contamination of presence of coeluting compounds
7.1.6.4.5 Ions present in the referenca^Wctrum but not^io the"
sample spectrum should be reviewed for possible subtraction from\th«
sample spectrum because of background cofcta/ination or coeluting
compounds. Data system library reduction /rograms/vcan sometimes create
these discrepancies.
7.1.6.5 Results are reported on Fond I-^AVC. othe/ documentation
includes Form V-AAVC and VI-AAVC, a G(&MS dkta sVste/n printout for the
analysis of the volatile calibration standard/"arid /the mass spectrum of
each target compound and system monitoring cbnipounc
7.1.7 Method Blank Analysis
7.1.7.1 A method blank is a Wlume of humtti—aaro_air (air with no
detectable levels of any analyse o$^£trt»cest) thaT~IS-caarried through the
entire analytical procedure. ThX^i^volum^mu^t^-ke^ejjual to the volume of
samples associated with the blankX THe purposfe of a method blank is to
determine the levels of contamination^ as^yci^ted with the processing and
analysis of samples.
7.1.7.2 For volatile
every 12 hours on eac)
1.4.6.6.
GC
analy^s^s, a metftod Mank must be analyzed once
system, as required in Exhibit D, Section
7.1.7.3 For the/ p
analysis must result/in no
in Exhibit D, Section
oses o:
an acceptable method blank
or above the CRQL as outlined
7.1.7.4 If a methdoSsblank Exceeds the limits for contamination above,
the Contractor must consrder thV-^nalytical system out of control. The
source of the-^ontaSttination flru^t be^jnvestigated and appropriate corrective
actions taken arid^documen^ed before further sample analysis proceeds. All
samples ptocjarssed wiSh^a method blahic that is out of control must be
reanalyzfed^t no additional &ost to the agency. The laboratory manager or
his de/ign4e must address\rob\lems and solutions in the SDG Narrative
(Exhi)
7.1.7.
described
Form III-AAVC^Methoc
analysis are reposed
must be assigned to each method blank, as
'on 3.1. This EPA sample number is listed on
'ummary, and the results of the method blank
rm I-AAVC under this unique EPA sample number.
July, 1991
Page E - 32
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.L.8 Performance Evaluation (PE) Samples
7.1.8.1 Performance and method evaluation samples Are/intended to assist
the Agency in monitoring Contractor and method performance. The laboratory
will not be Informed as to which compounds are conp4ir\ed in the PE samples
or the concentrations.
7.1.8.2 The laboratory shall extract, analyz
(Form I-AAVC) o- the PE sample once per sampl
available.
7.1.8.3 The laboratory will receive PE
the Agency. The samples will come with
extraction procedure required for the PE;
7.1.8.4 Each laboratory shall extr
using the procedure described in Exhi
7.1.8.5 The laboratory must meet the
acceptance criteria:
fol
results
Les in SUMMA® canisters from
Concerning the
te the PE sample
.4.
sample technical
7.1.8.5.1 The PE sample mu"3t-be__analyzed on a GC^MS/sys tern meeting
the BFB tuning, initial calibration, an3~~tro»tiiiuing calibration
technical acceptance criteria atvEhe—frequency described in Exhibit D,
Sections 1.4.5 to 1.4.6.
7.1.8.5.2 The PE sample must
to Exhibit D, Section 1.4.6.
The PE sample must
meets the blank te/fhni
id and analyzed with a method blank that
acceptance cr\teri
• The percent recover
must be within
5.
7.2 VOLATILES CO
acped and concentrated according
compounds in the PE Sample
accuracy, as outlined in Section
This section purpose is £bxoutrtiafi the minimum quality control (QC)
operations necas^ary^tS^aatisfy^ehe ana-lytical requirements associated with
the determinaytfLonaf__£he volatile otgaim: compounds listed in Exhibit C, using
the procedures in ExhibiTx^D for samples of ambient air captured on Tenax®.
This secticm Ls not intended. as\a comprehensive quality control document, but
rather as/a guide to the specific. QC operations that must be addressed during
analysis/of //olatiles using this taethod. The laboratory is expected to
address^Fhese^-oDerations in preparing the quality assurance plan and Standard
Operatingl^rocemlKes discusseid in Sections 2 and 3.
These operatior^ inctude/thss following:
July, 1991
Page E - 33
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Testing and Spiking of Tenax® cartridges;
• GC/MS Instrument Performance Check and Ion Abum
GC/MS Initial and Continuing Calibration;
Internal Marker and Surrogate Standards and
Method Blank Analysis;
System Monitoring Compound Recoveries;
Performance Evaluation (PE) Samples;
7.2.1 Testing and Spiking of Tenax® Car
\ >y ,
7.2.1.1 As part of the procedure for preparing 'JJenax® cartridges for
sampling and subsequent analysis (see Section^&^S. 5Kxthe laboratory is
required to analyze by GC/MS or FID one cartridge^romsach batch of
prepared Tenax® cartridges, and confirm that total V£)Ss aryless than 10
ng. If the total VOCs exceed Ij2r~ng7^the~-eivtire batch oT^Lenax® cartridges
shall be rejected.
7.2.1.2 For acceptable batches\t)^laboJa.tdrf~i3~-a¥so required to spike
each cartridge with 300 ng of PTI,\.2^icAloi!obenze-ne-d^, benzene-d6
chlorobenzene-d5, and l,4-dichlorobenXeneVd4//as initial and final markers
and surrogate standards, respectively.
7.2.2 GC/MS Performance
Patterns
7.2.2.1 Prior t
samples, blanks,
GC/MS system mee
D, Sections 2.3.*3xand
check is to ensure
transmission. This is
bromofluo-robenzejne__/BFB)
Mass Spectrometer and Ion Abundance
.ection activities involving
~" to establish that a given
criteria specified in Exhibit
.e purpose of this instrument performance
calibration, mass resolution, and mass
through the analysis of
7.2.2.2 /Th
each GC/MS
2.3.4.
7.2.2.4 The
bar graph spectrum
July, 1991
analysis (once every 12 hours on
in detail in Exhibit D, Sections 2.3.3 and
;d during the analysis of BFB and their
ia are given in Exhibit D, Section 2, Table
includes Form V-AAVT and a mass listing and
analysis.
~~~ Page E - 3'
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.2.3 Initial Calibration of GC/MS for Target Compounds and System Monitoring
Compounds /^
7.2.3.1 Prior to the analysis of samples and re
instrument performance criteria have been met, th
initially calibrated utilizing target compound (
monitoring compound standards.
7.2.3.2 Both external and internal calibra/i
Exhibit D, Sections 2.3.4.1 and 2.3.4.2 resp
7.2.4 Internal Standard Calibration Procedur
7.2.4.1 The GC/MS may be calibrated
Tenax® tubes, and calculating concentr
factor (RRF) method.
zd blanks and after
/MS system must be
4.) and system
7.2.4.2 Calibration standards contain"*
interest are prepared as outlined in Exhibi
2.4.3.
7.2.4.3 The Tenax® tubes ar
internal markers and surrogat
2.3.6.
7.2.4.4 The tubes are then ana
7.2.4.5 Relative response factors
Exhibit D, Section 2.3.4.2.
ibed in
ndards spiked onto
lative response
7.2.4.6 The docum
printout for the
mass spectrum of
7.2.5 GC/MS Contin'
Compounds
7.2.5.1 Once the
be verified each twelve
7.2.5.2
in Exhil
The
get compounds of
s 2.4.1, 2.4.2 or
with knowrNco^centrations of
ibed in Exhibit D, Section
ribed in Exhibit D, Section 2.3.5
are calculated as described in
VII^AAVT, a GC/MS data system
.bration standard, and the
system monitoring compound.
andar
Sectio
Compounds and System Monitoring
has been calibrated, the calibration must
j:ime period for each GC/MS system.
to be^anadyzed according to the procedures given
L and at the frequency given in Section 2.3.5.1.
7.2.5.X3 / The continuing\caiibration of the GC/MS system is evaluated on
the tiasiA of the magnitude\ of\the response factors and the percent
diffcerencexbetween the average RRF of each compound from the initial
calibration and the RRF of that compound in the continuing calibration
standard !\Ihe mismnum ressponse factors of each compound in the continuing
calibration alxi the^p-erjcent? difference must meet the criteria given in
July, 1991
Page E - 35
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Exhibit D, Sections 2.3.4.1.6 and Section 2.3.4.2. AlAow4nce is made for
any two volatile compounds that fail to meet these c]rite. and^fche
monitoring compound.
Retention Times
A
rdsr in all calibration
;tsion of reliable
ation of volatile
of. internal standards
7.2.6.2 The specific compounds used as internal
standards are given in Exhibit D_Section 2.2.3.6.
and surrogate standard is spikac on~tn~e—^^oaax® cartridge^
approximately 300 ng.
and surrogate
ernal marker
't a level of
7.2.6.3 The retention time and\the\selectee
of each internal marker and surrogate s-candar,
analyses. \ v /
ion exit-rent profile (SICP)
must be monitored for all
7.2.6.4 The area r
from the SICP and the /retention
standard are evaluated
Exhibit D, Section /. 3y8. The
standard in a sample Must not
the same internal/marker and
continuing calib/ratofian standard
internal marker
retention time in tn~6xcontlm.
Exhibit D, Section 2.3.
each internal marker and surrogate standard
.time of the internal marker and surrogate
,bi$iit, accorHin£> to the procedures in
im^Trnal marker and surrogate
more-^-than 40 percent from the area of
rd in the associated
the retention time of an
tandard must be within 30 seconds of its
calibration standard, as described in
7.2.6.5 Jtequirements\for anklesis"yDf samples when internal marker and
surrogate/stai«Iar35~Ni^ not\meet specifications are given in Exhibit D,
Section/2.3/10.
7.2.6/6 / The documentation includes Form III-AAVT and the GC/MS data
system printout for the anajlys^s of each sample, blank, matrix spike, and
standard.
July, 1991
Page E - 36
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.2.7 Method Blank Analysis
tube thermally
entire analytical
7.2.7.1 A'method blank is a certified clean Tena>
desorbed with a volume of helium carried through the
procedure. The volume of helium must be approximateI)/equal to the volume
associated with the blank. The purpose of a methcfd blahi is to determine
the levels of contamination associated with the /rocfe&sing^and analysis of
samples.
7.2.7.2 A method blank shall be analyzed
GC/MS system, as described in detail in Exhibit
'every 12 hours^Qn eae
'D, Section 2.3.4.
7.2.7.3 For the purposes of this protocol/ an
must contain less than or equal to the Cpnttfact Reqi
(see Exhibit C) of any single target compound, or
for total VOCs, whichever is less.
liable method blank
Quantitation Limit
than 10 ng/cartridge
.mits foj
7.2.7.4 If a method blank exceeds the
the Contractor must consider the analytical
source of the contamination shall be investigat
corrective actions taken and documented before
proceeds . The requirements for,
in Exhibit D, Section 2.3.8.3.
Astern
and
further s
•sis of associat
contamination above,
t of control. The
ropriate
le analysis
mples are given
7.2.7.5 The documentation inc!l
and a GC/MS data system printout
£d«X Form IV-ASVT-fat/the blank analysis
f\r t^e a/al/sis of the method blank.
7.2.8 System Monitoring Compound Recoveries
7.2.8.1 The recover^s of l:he three surrogate compounds (see Exhibit D,
Section 2.2.3.6) are/alcttla^ed ^f rom the ahalysds of each sample, blank,
and matrix spike. The jfurpose\ o4xthev^stem\mo(nitoring compounds is to
evaluate the performance of thi entire Tenax^Xiesorption GC/MS system.
Poor purging efficiency, leaks/, arfoTc^d sp5£s in transfer lines are only a
few of the potential/causes -blank/
described in Exhibit D,
compounds are added to each Tenax® tube
and matrix spike, at the concentration
^".2.3.6.
in the quali
f the recovery
its, the
10'.
of theNsystiem monitoring compounds are calculated
in Exhibit D, Section 2.3.8. The recoveries
control limits given in Exhibit D, Section
iy one system monitoring compound is outside
nAist follow the steps outlined in Exhibit D,
7.2.8.4
printout for
July, 1991
on/includes Form I-AAVT, and a GC/MS data system
of each sample, blank, and matrix spike.
'Page E - 37
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.2.9 Performance Evaluation (PE) Samples
7.2.9.1 Performance and method evaluation samples' ar£ intended to assist
the Agency in monitoring Contractor performance. JZtie laboratory will not
be informed as to which compounds are contained in the Pt^amples or the
concentrations.
7.2.9.2 The Laboratory shall extract, anal}
the PE sample once per sample delivery group.
and report tt
available.
resv
of
7.2.9.3 The laboratory will receive PE Camples on Tenax® cartridges from
the Agency. The samples will come with instructions/concerning the
desorption procedure required for the PE/saaples. the/Laboratory must add
internal markers and surrogate compounds tp the PE/san3^5 rb-t those target
compounds listed in Exhibit C, Table 1.
7.2.9.5 The laboratory must
acceptance criteria as detaile
7.2.9.5.1 The PE sample must:\be ^analyZed/on a GC/MS system meeting
the BFB tuning, initial calibratron,\ana continuing calibration
technical acceptance criteria at the frequency described in Section
2.3.5.
7.3
PE sample technical
.12:
7.2.9.5.2 The PE/sample mxis
D, Section 2.3.5.
7.2.9.5.3 Th
blank that meel^s
7.2.9.5.4
within acceptable
7.2. 9."5. 5
recent
must b
7.2.
be
5.
SEMIVCJ
.ccording to Section Exhibit
and analyzed with a method
tance criteria.
'overy for each of the surrogates must be
outlined in Exhibit D, Section 2.3.8.3.
.nge between the PE sample and the most
s for each of the surrogate standards
overy for each of the target compounds must
>n and audit accuracy, as outlined in Section
The purpose of this section/is to outline the minimum quality control (QC)
operations necessary to^satis/ry the analytical requirements associated with
July, 1991
Page E - 38
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
the determination of the semivolatile organic compounds listed in Exhibit C,
using the procedures in Exhibit D. This section is not /ntended as a
comprehensive quality control document, but rather as a/gufde to the specific
QC operations that must be addressed during analysis
on PUF/XAD-2. The laboratory is expected to address
preparing the quality assurance plan and Standard 0
discussed in Sections 2 and 3.
captured
e operations in
rocedures
These operations include the following:
Testing and Spiking of PUF/XAD-2 cartridges/
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check anjz
GC/MS Initial and Continuing Calibr^
• Internal Standards, Surrogate Compl
• Laboratory Method Blank Analysis;
• Surrogate Compound Recoveries; and
Performance Evaluation (PEj
7.3.1 Testing and Spiking of PUF/
7.3.1.1 As part of the procedureNfor^
sampling and subsequent analysis, the\
GC/MS or GC/ECD one car
cartridges from each
that the total level/of
PUF/XAD-2 sandwich),
10 /ig, the entire
aring PUF/XAD-2 cartridges for
is required to analyze by
whichever is greater, of the
2 cartridges, and confirm
idge assembly (filter and
total semivolatiles exceed
or cleaned until acceptable.
7.3.1.2 For
each cartridge
3.
7.3.2 GC/MS Performance Chec"
Pattern
July, 1991
jratory is also required to spike
:ompounds as discussed in Exhibit D, Section
Mass Spectrometer and Ion Abundance
any data collection activities involving QC
^sary to establish that a given GC/MS system
ice criteria specified in Exhibit D, Section
nent performance check is to ensure correct
:ion, and mass transmission. This is
l/ysis of decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP) .
Page E - 39
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.3.2.2 The required frequency of DFTPP analysis Q6nce< every 12 hours on
each GC/MS system) is described in detail in Exhibit^!), /Sections 3.
^DFTPP and their
Section 3,
7.3.2.3 The key ions produced during the analy
respective ion abundance criteria are given in
Table D\SV-5.
7.3.3 Initial Calibration of the GC/MS System
7.3.3.1 Prior to the analysis of samples/and required
instrument performance criteria have been/met/ the GC/MS system must be
initially calibrated using calibration s^andfirds con/£a^tning the target
compounds, surrogates, and internal star
7.3.3.2 The detailed procedure is gi;
7.3.3.3 The GC/MS is calibrated by
PUF/XAD-2 cartridge assemblies, and calculating
relative response factor (RRF) method.
7.3.3.4 Calibration standar
interest are prepared as outli
the PUF/XAD-2 cartridges.
, Section 3.
ridards spiked onto the
trations by the
target compounds of
3 and spiked onto
7.3.3.5 The PUF/XAD-2 cartridges
internal standards and surrogate
Section 3.
7.3.3.6 The cartri
Section 3.
7.3.3.7 Relati
Exhibit D, Secti
d with known concentrations of
s described in Exhibit D,
ak described in Exhibit D,
v
.re calculated as described in
7.3.3.8 The
printout for the ana1
the mass spectrum of
7.3.4 GC/MS C,
7.3.4.1
be veri^fi
7.3.4.3 The c^antinu
the basis of the ma
July, 1991
Deludes Form III-AASV, a GC/MS data system
feach semivolatile calibration standard, and
and surrogate compound.
stem has been calibrated, the calibration must
i \iour time period for each GC/MS system.
e analyzed according to the procedures given
t the frequency given in Exhibit D, Section
Calibration of the GC/MS system is evaluated on
of the response factors and the percent
Page E - 40
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
data system
and the
difference between the average RRF of each compound from the initial
„calibration and the RRF of that compound in the contiriuiife calibration
standard. The'minimum response factors of each compcnmd/with minimum RRFs
in the continuing calibration and the percent diff&/&nikebKon the PUF/XAD-2
cartridge at the level specified in Exhibit D, Section 3.
7.3.5.3 The retention time
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.3.6.3 For the purposes of this protocol, an acceptable laboratory
method blank must contain less than or equal to the Gbnt/act Required
Quantitation Limit (see Exhibit C) of any single target/compound, or less
than 10 Mg/cartridge for total semivolatiles, whic#ever\is less.
the>
ier/the anal
;t be
7.3.6.4 If a laboratory method blank exceeds
contamination above, the Contractor shall
out of control. The source of the contaminati
appropriate corrective actions taken and documented before furthei
analysis proceeds. The requirements for reXna}/ysis of associated san
are given in Exhibit D, Section 3.
7.3.6.5 The documentation includes Fo/m .ZV-AASV for /fche blank analysis
and a GC/MS data system printout for tbfe a/alysis ft tzhe laboratory method
blank. f C r r
7.3.7 Surrogate Compound Recoveries
7.3.7.1 The recoveries of the surrogate compound* are^salculated from
the analysis of each sample and Man^ The purpose orxrtie^surrogate
:forman5e-~e€-£he entire wF/XAD-2 acrtridge
leaks-;—and cold spots in
auses of poor recovery of
compounds is to evaluate the p
and GC/MS system. Poor extrac
transfer lines are only a few
these compounds.
Lorn
^th«
\
7.3.7.2 The surrogate compounds are
assembly prepared for sampling at the
D, Section 3.
pncei
each PUF/XAD-2 cartridge
itrations described in Exhibit
7.3.7.3 The recovafrieX of^she \surrogate kompdunds are calculated
according to the procedures injExKibit^SL Sec\Zon 3. The recoveries must
be within the qua!/ty/control Iimits-^giveri^ia Exhibit D, Section 3. If the
recovery of any oj(e ^rrogate/compounoNisou^side these limits, the
Contractor shall/ follow the /tej/s outlinedin Exhibit D, Section 3.
7.3.7.4 The documentation /ncludes Form I-AASV, and a GC/MS data system
printout for the analysi^of eksh sample and blank.
7.3.8 Performarlce Evaluation^ (PE)
7.3.8.1 / Performance
the Agancy/in monitoring
be informed as to which co
concentrations .
method evaluation samples are intended to assist
mtisactor performance. The laboratory will not
lounds are contained in the PE samples or the
7 . 3 .8 .2
the PE sampi
^oratoryyshall extract, analyze, and report the results of
pnce >er sainpl^fe delivery group, if available.
July, 1991
Page E - 42
-------
Exhibit E
SOU No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.3.8.3 The laboratory will receive PE samples on PyUF/XAD-2 cartridges
.from the Agency. The samples will come with instruction^ concerning the
extraction procedure required for the PE samples. The ^laboratory shall add
internal and surrogate compounds to the PE sample,/following procedures in
Exhibit D, Section 2.3.6.
7.3.8.4 Each laboratory shall extract and co
using the procedure described in Exhibit D, Seit
semivolatile target compounds listed in Exhibit
/^^
7.3.8.5 The laboratory shall meet the fc
acceptance criteria as detailed in Exhibij
7.3.8.5.1 The PE sample must be aj
the DFTPP tuning and initial calibr^
technical acceptance criteria at
Section 3.
7.3.8.5.2 The PE sample must be desorb>
D, Section 3.
7.3.8.5.3 The PE sample niust~
blank that meets the blank(technical accept
losing PE sample techm
Section 3:
7.4
7.3.8.5.6 Th.
be within repl^
D, Section 3.
INORGANICS
system meeting
ing calibration
fecribed in Exhibit D,
to Section Exhibit
d with a method
iteria.
7.3.8.5.4 The percent reco
within acceptable windows as
,ch/oiT~Ehe—Surrogates must be
Ixhibit D, Section 3.
7.3.8.5.5 The area response chaWe between the PE sample and the most
recent calibration standard analysisVforveach of the surrogate standards
must be within 40
ea^ and the SjOPs/discussed in Section 3.
These operations
the following:
July, 1991
Page E - 43
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Calibration
and
Instrument Calibration;
• Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) and Conti/fuii
Verification (CCV);
• CROL Standards;
• Linear Range Standard (LRS) Analyses;
• Initial Calibration Blank (ICB), Continuing/Calibration Blank (CCl
Preparation Blank (PB) Analyses;
• Interference Check Sample (ICS) Analy/
Spike Sample Analyses;
• Analytical Spike Sample Analyses;
Duplicate Sample Analyses;
Laboratory Control Sample (
Instrument Detection Limit (
Interelement Corrections for ICP\
7.4.1 Instrument Calibration
7.4.1.1 Guidelines for instrum
Inorganics, Section if. 3
inscrument shall be
the instrument is set
7.4.1.2 The ca
matrix and at tti
sample preparation
and Section 4.5.4 and
7.4.2 Initi
7.4.2.1
calibr
do cum
resu
Table
ins trume
the ICV sha
analysis.
July, 1991
ion\are outlined in Exhibit D,
r 4.5.5.1 for GFAA. Each
:ery 24 hours and each time
be prepared using the same type of
snt/ation as the preparation blank, following
/outlined in Exhibit D, Section 4.3.6 for ICP
^ vGFAA.
(ICV)
each of the ICP and GFAA systems have been
initial calibration shall be verified and
the analysis of EPA ICV solution(s). When
:he control limits in Exhibit D, Section 4,
1 be terminated, the problem corrected, the
:he calibration reverified. For ICP and GFAA,
reported at each wavelength and mass used for
Page E - 44
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.4.2.2 If the ICVs are not available from EPA, or a certified solution of
.an analyte is not available from any source, analyses/shall be conducted on
an independent 'standard, at a concentration other thai* that used for regular
instrument calibration, but within the calibration /ange. An independent
standard is defined as a standard composed of the .analqrtes from a different
source than those used in the standards for the instrument, calibration.
7.4.3 Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV)
7.4.3.1 To insure calibration accuracy durii
required in Exhibit D, Section 4.3.7.3 for /CP/and Section 4.5.5.3"
GFAA, the laboratory shall analyze a CCV aolutaon, either prepared by EPA
or Contractor-prepared, for every wavelength/used foifvanalysis at the
beginning of the run and after the last /analytical pampLe.
7.4.3.2 Each CCV analyzed shall reflect fel].e conditions of analysis of all
associated analytical samples (the preseding^lO/anaiytical samples or the
preceding analytical samples up to the pre-^ious CC#). The duration of
analysis, rinses, and other related operatiorfcsvthat^may affect the CCV
measured result may not apply to the CCV to a greater extent than the
extent applied to the associated analytical samples/"
7.4.3.3 If the deviation of
specified in Exhibit D, Section"
terminated, the problem corrected^ a^\d the yCCV,
the reanalysis yields a CCV value «ith\n pont?
10 analytical samples or all analyt
acceptable calibration verification shall
affected. Otherwise the^ias^rument shal
verified, and the affected ana
ftical sample!
the control limits
-3, the analysis shall be
ed only once. If
ol limits, then the preceding
es analyzed since the last
analyzed for the analytes
recalibrated, the calibration
rerun.
7.4.4 CRQL Standards/ / \
7.4.4.1 To veri: _
CRQL standard at/tw«(times ttie
lower. The CRQbxstanSard shaLJ
each sample analysis^run or a/n
shift, whichever is
Exhibit D, Section4.3.7.
standard mu&€be run^or ever1
7.4.5
July, 1991
:he Contractor shall analyze a
'times the IDL, whichever is
be analyzed at the beginning and end of
minimum of twice per eight hour working
nt, but not before ICV, as outlined in
and Section 4.5.5.4 for GFAA. This
ngth used for analysis.
7.4.4.2 /Re
percent/of
the analy,
samples
lysis of the CRQL standard must be within ±10
each wavelength used for analysis. If not,
ed, the problem corrected, and the analytical
le CRI reanalyzed.
lysis
Page E - 45
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.4.5.1 A Linear range verification check standard n&SV shall be analyzed
.at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run/ OT/a minimum of twice
per eight hour'working .shift, whichever is more frequer(t, but not before
ICV, as outlined in Exhibit D, Section 4.3.7.5 for'ICIKand Section 4.5.5.5
for GFAA. This standard must be run for every waVel^ejigthSused for
analysis.
percent of
7.4.5.2 Results for the analysis of the LRS i&isjz'be within ^1
the true value for each wavelength used f or/ana^ys is . If not,
must be terminated and successive dilutions/of/the standard must be'
reanalyzed until the control limits are met. /The concentration of this
standard that meets the control limits is/th/ upper /iMt of the instrument
linear range beyond which results canno/be/reporte/G u^der this contract
without dilution of the analytical sample,
7.4.6 Initial and Continuing Calibration^
irses
7.4.6.1 A calibration blank must be analyzed
analysis immediately after every initial and
verification, at a frequency of.
run, whichever is more frequent
and 4.3.7.7 for ICP and Sectios
must be analyzed at the beginni
sample .
eacRxwavelength used for
continuingcalibration
rs during the
Sections 4.3.7.(
GFAA. The blank
the^ruiy and__af ter /6he last analytical
ercent of every
7.4.6.2 If the absolute value of thexblYnk/result exceeds the CRQL
(Exhibit C) , analysis must be terminated, toe problem corrected, and the
continuing calibration
CCB with an absolute v-alue beloV the CRQL\al
since the last accepytablecaMbration blankXm
the instrument must/be/recalibYatr^d7^h< calr
affected analytical sample(s) yrer
If the reanalysis yields a
analytical samples analyzed
be reanalyzed. Otherwise,
•ation verified, and the
7.4.6.3 Each analytical sample/must be bracketed by two consecutive CCBs
that have been afta^yzea^s^itnin/two hours of each other with no more than
ten analytical samplfesrun between the CCBs. The absolute value for each
analyte in these two CC&s^mustNfall below the CRQL or IDL, whichever is
greater.
7.4.7
Analyst
eagent blank) consisting of reagent water
reparation and analysis procedure must be
SDG or with each batch of samples
requent), as outlined in Exhibit D, Section
'.5.5.7 for GFAA.
July, 1991
Page E - 46
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.4.7.2 The first batch of samples in an SDG shall to
,one, the second batch of samples to PB two, etc. Eae
the results of'all the PB analyses associated with t
7.4.7.3 The PB is to be reported for each SDG an
ascertain whether sample concentrations reflect
following manner:
7.4.7.3.1 If the absolute value of the
less than or equal to the CRQL (Exhibit C)
results is performed.
assigned to PB
kage must contain
ples in that SDG.
in all analyses to
:ion in the
7.4.7.3.2 If any analyte concentration/in the
all associated samples containing le
must be redigested and reanalyzed
concentration not to be corrected for &h.e bla:
is above the CRQL,
.an lOx ;fhe /blank concentration
te/ The sample
lue.
that ana]
7.4.7.3.3 If an analyte concentratibti in the
CRQL, all samples with reported analyte values
associated with the blank must be redigested
'PB is below the negative
^w lOx CRQL and
reanalyzed.
7.4.7.3.5
The values for
it be recorded
/Mg/L.
7.4.8 Interference Check Sample\naWs~Is~
7.4.8.1 To verify interelement
Contractor must analyze and report
Sample (ICS). The ICS must be analyzed at,
analysis run or a minimum—ef^twice per eiglvl
is more frequent, but/not befo
The ICP ICS must be obtaifieUsfrofy EPA (EMSt^
according to the instructions
correction factors, the
s for an Interference Check
e beginning and end of each
hour working shift, whichever
Exhibit D, Section 4.3.7.9).
LV>>, if available, and analyzed
ICS.
pOt€
7.4.8.2 The ICS donslst of
Solution A must
contain both analytes
analyzing both solvte^ons
wavelengths used for e
ite
ns
ana
"6luti4ythe true value for the analytes
terminate the analysis, correct the problem,
.d reanalyze the analytical samples analyzed
If true values for analytes contained in
not supplied with the ICS, the mean
must be determined by initially analyzing
petitively for the particular analytes. This
de during an analytical run where the results
EPA ICS met all contract specifications.
include
recali
since
the
cone"
the ICS
mean deternfioatioitxmust 1/e i
for the previo
ratie the instrument,
Che/last acceptable\CSl
EtlS and analyzed by ICE ai
att^n for each analyte
July, 1991
Page E - 47
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Additionally, the result of this initial mean determinatin is to be used
as the true value for the lifetime of that solution #l.e/, until the
solution is exhausted)..
7.4.9 Spike Sample Analysis
7.4.9.1 The spike sample analysis is designed' to/provideX^nforlftation
about the effect of the sample matrix on the digestion and mea^ureme
methodology. The spike is added before the «e?r~b^ the same
with the letter "N".
lin the limits of 75-125
received associated with that
rtical method must be flagged
7.4.10 Analytical Splice Sample
7.4.10.1 The an
information abo
system. The spi
analysis. At least
group of samples of
Section 4.3.7
7.4.10.2
that is/ch
be per
sampl
results Cannot
Samp
analysis^
sample analyses
July, 1991
Leal
spit
imple
effect
'the sample"
is
spike
sinffciar
LS is designed to provide
natrix on the measurement
fer the sample has been prepared and prior to
'sample analysis must be performed on each
?e for each SDG, according to Exhibit D,
an 4.5.5.11 for GFAA.
spike Tactalysis is performed on the same sample
ate sample analysis, spike calculations must
of the sample designated as the "original
.nalysis). The average of the duplicate
purpose of determining percent recovery.
anks cannot be used for spike sample
t a specific sample be used for the spike
Page E - 48
-------
Exhibit E
SOU No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.4.10.3 For analytical spike sample analysis, each
with a concentration equal to 30 percent of the ana
The sample and spiked sample oust be at the can* dilu
ce must be spiked
Linear range.
7.4.10.4 If the spike recovery is not within the IfaitA of 852-1152, a
second analytical spike must be performed. If the/sacon&Nanalytical spike
is out of control, the preparation blank must be /pifcfed^witfcvche same
spiking solution. If spiking the blank yields
control, the. spiking solution oust be prepared
spiking procedure repeated. If not, all
sample and determined by the same analytical
the latter "E".
d must be
7.4.11 Duplicate Sample Analysis
7.4.11.1 One duplicate sample must be
for each SDG, as outlined in-Exhibit
Section 4.5.5.9 for GFAA. Duplicates canrfc
results,
-v
7.4.11.2 Samples identified as field blanks cannot
sample analysis. EPA. may requiygTSrut-tL_Specific
duplicate sample analysis. If x
the reported values for the sane\el
duplicate samples oust be run by
group of samples
.12 for ICP and
'ag«d in reporting
sample^1
are
7.4.12 Laboratory Control Sample Analy
7.4.12.1 The Laboratory
analyte using the same
procedures employed fj
Section 4.3.7.12 for/IC!
7.4.13
July. 1991
ol Sample \LC
paration.
:or duplicate
used for
used to obtain
ICP and GFAA),
must be analyzed for each
leal methods and QA/QC
as outlined in Exhibit D,
GFAA.
7.4.12.2 The EPA-y
the procedures a'
unavailable, oth'
materials may be
group of samples in a
is more frequent
7.4.12.3
establis
and the
contro
limit
d and analyzed using each of
d. If the EPA LCS is
'ssuranca check samples or other certified
must be prepared and analyzed for every
each batch of samples prepared, whichever
e not within the control limits
must be terminated, the problem corrected.
the LCS prepared again and reanalyzed. A
the true value must be used if no control
s solution.
) Sample
Page E - 49
-------
Exhibit E
SOW Ho. XXX - Anhient Air
7.4.13.1 The Performance Evaluation (PE) Sample will assist the Agency in
monitoring contractor performance. The laboratory wilVW be informed in
advance of the analytes in the PE sample or their concentration
7.4.13.2 The Contractor must prepare, analyze and
one PE sanple per each SDG, if available, as outli
3, Inorganics.
fep/rt the results of
^Exhibit D, Section
7.4.13.3 Prepare the PE sample using the proce^u
preparation section of Section 4, Exhibit D, a^Lnalyzs the
using the methods described in Exhibit D for/th> analysis of EPA"
samples. All contract required QC must als/ be' met.
7.4.13.4 The Contractor must demonstra
analyt* identification and quantificati
score of less than 75 percent, the Age
the following actions: Show Cause and^
number of samples shipped to the labora
a. site visit, a full data audit, and/or req
remedial PE sample.
ac^eptable/paVformance for
If the .Contractor achieves a
iy take/bu/is not limited to
reduction of the
•ion of sample shipment,
Aboratory to analyze a
7.4.14 Instrument Detection Limit
7.4.14.1 The Instrument Detection
for each instrument used, within\30
analysis and at least quarterly (e\
Exhibit D. Section 4.3.7.14 for ICP*
must be equal to or less than CRQLs ()
lination
1
EDL) (in /ZgTt^ust be determined
lys prlySr »—nhg__s^art of any contract
.en/dar months), as outlined in
m 4.5.5.11 for GFAA. The IDL
•ecified in Exhibit C.
7.4.14.2 The IDLs must
the standard deviations o
in reagent water) at/a co'nceri
consecutive measure;
ware a separate
by a rinse and/a
analysis of sep
each wavelength
ine
nined by
\on three
lt
ilytfical
other
Eacfl measur
rate
in
lying by chree ch« averag« of
nconsecutive days (each analyce
IDL, with seven
must be performed AS though it
measurement must be followed
^ .y performed between the
must be determined and reported for
lysis of the samples.
ea
LDLs
7.4.14.3 The quarterly d>i^rmi£esnay af^act die IDL. the IDL for that instrument
™?*e 5fde£f™in«a>«^ the result submitted for use as the established
IDL forythaX instrumentXor the remainder of the quarter.
7.4.14<4
reportxng
DLs must be repored^for each instrument and submitted with each
If multiple instruments are used for the analysis of an
SDG, the highest IDL for the analyte must be used for
ation v
for that SDG.
July, 1991
Page E - 50
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
7.4.14.5 The IDL for each analyte must be less than or^qual to the CRQL.
FAn exception is granted if the analyte concentration yn t*he samples is
greater than"or equal to five times the reported IDL,
7.4.15 Interelement Corrections for ICP
7.4.15.1 The ICP intereleraent correction factor
3 months prior to beginning sample analyses um
least annually thereafter, as outlined in Exhj,
Correction factors for spectral interference
wavelengths used for each analyte reported J/y ]/CP
7.4.15.2 The correction factors must be
instrument conditions used for sample a
adjusted in any way that may affect th<
factors, the factors must be redeterm
use. The interelement factors determ'
analytes, for each instrument used to
rmined within
.nd at
5.
the same
instrument was
t correction
ults submitted for
reported for all ICP
in the SDG.
July, 1991
Page E - 51
-------
Exhibit E
SOU No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 8
REGIONAL DATA REVIEW
Contract laboratory data are generated to meet
Regions. In order to verify the usability of data
each Region reviews data from the perspective of e
functional aspects of data quality. General gui
been developed jointly by the Region and the Nation;
Region uses these guidelines as the basis for data/evaluation. Individ
Regions may augment the basic guideline revieypr/cess with additional review
based on Region-specific or site-specific concerns. Reg/fohal reviews, like
the sites under investigation, vary based o/thfe nature/of/the problems under
investigation and the Regional response ap/ropriate tc/the specific
circumstances.
needs of the
purpose,
tve
contractual discrepancies, and the
to evaluate Contractor and method
are integrated into a collective
laboratory administration and manag^
action to correct deficiencies in the^
Regional data reviews relating usability^af the 4iata to a specific site
are part of the collective assessment process. Tnfev comp^i^ment the review
done at the Sample Management Office, which is designed, to
done at EMSL/L^vWhi«fli is designed
lese individual evaluations
jr program and
take appropriate
ffance.
July, 1991
Page E - 52
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 9
LABORATORY EVALUATION SAMPLES
Although intralaboratory-QC may demonstrate Contra
performance that can be tracked over time, an extery
program is an essential feature of a QA program.
Contractor and method performance, Contractors p
comparison studies conducted by the EPA. Resul
laboratory evaluation samples will be used by
Contractor's continuing ability to produce ac
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Deficiencies exist in the Contractor's performanc
Within 14 days of receipt of notification from/EPA/ the Contractor
shall describe the deficiency(ies) and the actn.on$$) taken to correct
the deficiency(ies) in a letter to the Administrative\Project
Officer, the Technical'Project Officer, andEMS
Unacceptable Performance, Response Explainir
(Score less than 75 percent):
Teficiency(ieX) Reqttijred
• Deficiencies exist in the Contractor's' performance to the extent that
the National Program Office has determined that/€he Contractor has
not demonstrated the capability to ineetr the conftract requirements.
• Within 14 days of receipt of notification fr^m BPA, the Contractor
shall describe the deficiency (ies )^and tfts^/ctifon^) taken to correct
the deficiency (ies) in a letter to the\Adminis(trative Project
Officer, the Technical Project Officer, ah< EMSt>tLV.
The Contractor shall be notified by the Administrative Project Officer
or Technical Project Officer conce/ning~~Etre—iaaiedy for their\«macceptable
performance. A Contractor may expect ^--hut!EPA isnot-iimited to, the
following actions: Reduction of th\ number~~o~f—samoles seny under the
contract, suspension of sample shipment oo the/CootractSr/ a site visit, a
full data audit, analysis of remedial RE samples / and/or a contract sanction,
such as a Cure Notice. \ v /
NOTE: A Contractor's promot^re»fionse demonstrating that corrective action has
been taken to ensure the Contractor's capabirity\o meet contract requirements
will facilitate continuatiopr^of^£u.ll\ sample deisj-vei
July, 1991
Page E - 54
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
.agnetic tapes
its.
SECTION 10
GC/MS TAPE AUDITS
Periodically, EPA requests from Contractors th
corresponding to a specific Case in order to accompYis
Generally, tape submissions and audits are request
reasons:
Program overview;
• Indication of data quality problems from EMSL/LV, /SMO, or Regional data
reviews;
Support for on-site audits; and
Specific Regional requests.
Depending upon the reason for an audit, the "fea^es fbom a recent Case, a
specific Case, or a laboratory evaluation sample may t?e\re queued. Tape
audits provide a mechanism to assej«-a4he£ence to contractual/requirements and
to ensure the consistency of data/reportedorrThe-4iaEdcopy/floppy diskettes
with that generated on the GC/MS ^e^~-Jfbia^unctionpTcByides external
monitoring of Program QC requirements ahd checks aOhtiejicj/of the Contractor
to internal QA procedures. In addition,\ape/audits enable EPA to evaluate
the utility, precision, and accuracy orVthe\Xna^ytical methods.
The GC/MS tape shall include raw data and quantitation reports for
samples, blanks, laboratop/evaliia±ion samples,\Lnitial calibrations,
continuing calibration, /ndBF&asstociated wiNsh the Case requested. 'The
specific requirements f/r ^submiss^orls^-of^GC/MS \ap4s are discussed in Exhibit
Upon request:
required tapes and
within seven (7) days
Admini'stE4tive Pr»j^t Officer or EMSL/LV, the
ssay documentation shall be submitted to EPA
no
icarion.
July, 1991
Page E - 55
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 11
ON:SITE LABORATORY EVALUATIONS
At a frequency dictated by a contract laboratojfy
Administrative Project Officer, Technical Project
representative will conduct an on-site laboratory
laboratory evaluations are carried out to monito
meet selected terms and conditions specified in/fcfi
process incorporates two separate categories:
and an Evidentiary Audit.
11.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE ON-SITE EVALUATION
11.1.1 Quality assurance evaluators ins
verify the adequacy and maintenance of ins
personnel meeting experience or education requ
performance of analytical and QC procedures. The
that items to be monitored will include but not be 1
items:
Size and appearance of the
Quantity, age, availability,
instrumentation;
the
authorized
to
on
of SOPs;
rso^mel training programs;
lities;
11.1.2 Prio
performance/of
discussio
on-site
Regiona
trend re
:ra£tor's facilities to
the continuity of
and the acceptable
should expect
the following
.nd performance of
Availability, appropriateness, and
• Staff qualificatio
• Reagents, standa
Standard prepa
• Bench sheets a1
Review of the
procedures
ogbook maintenance and review, and
pie analysis/data package inspection
various documentation pertaining to
NCon\ractor is integrated in a profile package for
Items that may be included are previous
ition sample scores, Regional review of data,
GC/MS t^pe audit reports, results of CCS, and data
July, 1991
Page E - 56
-------
Exhibic E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
11.2 EVIDENTIARY AUDIT
11.2.1 Evidence auditors conduct an on-site laboratory/evaluation to
determine if laboratory policies and procedures are in/place to satisfy
evidence handling requirements as stated. The evidence a(udit is comprised of
the following three activities'.
11.2.1.1 Procedural Audit
11.2.1.1.1 The procedural audit consists/
actual standard operating procedures and/acc/ompanying
the following laboratory operations:
Sample receiving;
Sample storage;
Sample identification;
• Sample security;
Sample tracking (from
• Analytical proj ect fil
11.2.1.2 Written SOPs Audit
11.2.1.2.1 The written SOPs audit
the written SOPs to determine if
following laborato
sample identifica
completion of
assembly.
11.2.1.3 Analy
11.2.1.3.1 The
review and examina
The auditors review tfi
lysis); and
fets of review and examination of
ar*^ accurate and complete for the
jceiving, sample storage,
sample tracking (from receipt to
{ect file organization and
Audit
'project file evidence audit consists of
analytical project file documentation.
determine:
cumentNi4jyentory;
ile;
of the document numbering system;
activity;
etivity recorded on the documents; and
July, 1991
Page E - 57
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Error correction methods.
11.3 DISCUSSION" OF THE ON-SITE TEAM'S FINDINGS
11.3.1 The quality assurance and evidentiary audi
with the Administrative Project Officer/Technical
debriefing the Contractor. During the debriefin
findings and recommendations for corrective
Contractor personnel.
11.4
ir findings
to
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS FOR FOLLOV^T
EVIDENTIARY AUDIT REPORTS
.eir
LITY ASSURANCE AND
irance and evidentiary
ag /he on-site evaluation
11.4.1 Following an on-site evaluation, A}uartty as:
audit reports which discuss deficiencies fbund dul
will be forwarded to the Contractor. The Contractor i6ust discuss the
corrective actions taken to resolve the deficiencies discussed during the
on-site visit and discussed in the on-site reports m^a letb&r to the
Administrative Project Officer, Technical Project OfficebxEM&L/LV (response
to the quality assurance report) and NElC^tresparise to the evidentiary report)
within 14 days of receipt of the tind«tg^D^_within~^R5r-64=oifi agreed upon
between the Administrative Project Slffrcer/TectmicalProje/t Officer and the
Contractor. If SOPs are required toNie writtep or SOPs~~are required to be
amended, the Contractor must provide the S^s/to/the Technical Project
Officer, EMSL/LV (quality assurance/tecKnicM SOPs) and NEIC (evidentiary
SOPs) within 30 days of receipt of the finding&^ Officer/Xecmvical Project Officer and the
Contractor.
11.4.2 If the Contrac
resolve the deficienc
expect, but the Age
the number of samp
to the Contractor,
remedial PE samples an
.roprri&ce corrective action to
reports, a Contractor may
llowing actions: reduction of
suspension of sample shipment
si;Ce visit, a full data audit, analysis of
ct sanction, such as a Cure Notice.
July, 1991
Page E - 58
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 12
• • QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA TREND
Data submitted by laboratories are subject to reVi<*w from several
aspects: compliance with contract-required QC, usability7>tvJ full data
package evaluation. Problems resulting from any of/the^Lrev^s may
determine the need for a GC/MS tape audit, an on-stte/labo>avaluation
and/or a remedial laboratory evaluation sample. An Addition, ^^res^ibed in
the methods provides information that is continually used by the
assess sample data quality, Contractor data qualiey and Program datacuaLIty
via data trend analysis. Trend analysis is acWplished by entering data into
a computerized data base. Statistical repots /hat evaluate specific
anomalies or disclose trends in many areas/including ^he/following are
generated from this data base:
Surrogate Spike Recovery;
Laboratory Evaluation Sample;
• Blanks;
• GC/MS Instrument Performano^ Checks;
• Initial and Continuing Calibr£ioV Data;
• Other QC and Method Parameters.
Program-wide statistical^xesults are usN
observe the relative perfonnancebsf each Cor
against its peers. TheVrepjwrts^areX also used"
laboratories. The res "
overall evaluation of/a Gbntractoi:' s perfo^
determine if corrective/action OJK arx^on>s4te l
indicated in order
require
rank laboratories in order to
l^or using a given protocol
ientify trends within
analyses are included in
and are reviewed to
moratory evaluation is
its of the contract.
Contractor per
techniques to detect
levels of quality_control. a
problems whic
depa"z
to p
apparent fro:
time is monitored using these trend analysis
Contractor output from required or desired
"--(vide an early warning of Contractor QA/QC
the results of an individual case.
As a
informati
analytic
vast em-
ana lyz
performanc
control and p
achievable and
production analysis
^vy
.he Program, the data base provides the
erformance-based criteria in updated
.ory criteria have been previously used. The
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Agency in meeting its objec, -es of obtaining data of kn^wn/4nd documented
quality.
July, 1991
Page E - 60
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 13
• . DATA MANAGEMENT
Data management procedures are defined as proce/
acquisition or entry, update, correction, deletion,
computer readable data and files. These procedure
and contain a clear definition for all databases
resubmit deliverables. Key areas of concern inc
(including personnel and security), documentati
quality control.
Data manually entered from hard-copy
error rates estimated. Systems should pre
out-of-range data and alert data entry pe
entry error rates must be estimated and
reentering a statistical sample of the
discrepancy rates by data element.
The record of changes in the form of correc
originally generated, submitted, and/or resubmitted mt
allow traceability of updates. DowHaen£ation must inclu?
each change:
Justification or rationale
s specifying the
and security of
n written form
generate or
tion
and
quality controlled and the
.correct or
s. In addition, data
nthly basis by
calculating
Initials of the person making tnte cnange /or. changes. Data changes must
be implemented and reviewed by a person/or group independent of the
source generating the deliverable;
• Change documentation
original deliver
• Resubmitted d
part of the
resubmissio
inspected;
• The Laboratory Manage
de1iverabi€^T
t beXretained according to the schedule of the
Docv
updates to data
cumented to
following for
Fes must be reinspected as a
'tion pro ss prior to
, not just cne changes, must be
iprove changes to originally submitted
ion ofctata changes may be requested by laboratory auditors.
Life cycle/management procedures must be applied to computer software
systems/developed by the laboVatary to be used to generate and edit contract
delivei£ablesV^Such systems mpstjbe thoroughly tested and documented prior to
utilizati*
July, 1991
Page E - 61
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
A software test and acceptance plan including test
results and acceptance criteria must be developed
available in'written form.
lirements, test
flowed, and
• System changes must not be made directly to pr
generating deliverables. Changes must be
system and tested prior to implementation.
Each version of the production system wil]
number, date of installation, date of
• System and operations documentation
each system. Documentation must ii
operations and maintenance manual.
Individual(s) responsible for the fo]
identified:
System operation and maintenance including doc
• Database integrity, including data
control; and
• Data and system security, backu
stems
velopment
ion and archived.
and maintained for
.ual and an
ions must be
and training;
and quality
July, 1991
Page E - 62
-------
Exhibit E
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 14
' • REFERENCES
14.1 Fisk, J.F'. and Manzo, S.M. "Quality Assurance/Quality Control in
Organics Analysis", Proceedings from the Water Pollu/ion Control Federation
Meeting, May 1986.
14.2 Office of Monitoring Systems and Quality A
Protection Agency, "Interim Guidelines and Spec
Quality Assurance Project Plans", QAMS-005/80,
U.S.Enviror
itions for Prepa^ng
-rnber 1980.
14.3 Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re/ports e, U.S -Environmental
Protection Agency, Test Methods for Evaluating/Solid Wa4ta^ Third Edition
SW-846, November 1986.
14.4 Laidlaw, R.H., "Document Control anUsChaihxp£/Cus'tody Considerations for
the National Contract Laboratory Program," Qttality Control in Remedial Site
Investigations: Hazardous and Industrial Solid"W^ste Testing, Fifth Volume,
ASTM STP 925, C.L. Perket, ed., American Society forxTestihi and Materials
Philadelphia, 1986.
14.5 Health Effects Research
Agency, Manual of Analytical Method >
and Environmental Samples, EPA-600/J
U.S.
,80>Q36, jv
14.6 Environmental Protection Agency,
Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutant;
Rule and Interim Final Rule aad^Proposed
Register, Vol. 49, No. 209<\ pp 43SJ34-4"
Jnde
oental Protection
ilysis ofPe's tic ides in Humans
Establishing Test
the Clean Water Act; Final
V40 CFR Part 136, Federal
fiber 26, 1984.
14.7 Health Effects Re-sea/ch Labbraleofy^^U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Manual of Analytical Quality ControK^or Pesticides and Related
Compounds In Human ami Environmej/tal/Saliip^es-Second Revision,
EPA-600/2-81-059, A/ril/1981.
14.8 Environmental MohxJ-M>and Pearson/ J/G. "Quality Assurance Support for the
Superfund Contract Laborator^ P/ogram", Quality Control in Remedial Site
Investigation: Ha^ardousxafid Industrial Solid Waste Testing, Fifth Volume,
ASTM STP 925, C.L. Pe>ket, ed/, American Society for Testing and Materials,
July, 1991
Page E - 63
-------
Exhibit: E
SOW Xo. XXX - Ambient Air
Philadelphia L?36
July, 1991
Page E - 64
-------
-------
EXHIBIT F
EVIDENTIARY REQUIREMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pace No.
SECTION 1 SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
1.1 Sample Identification / • ^ ^X; -7 F-1
1.2 Chain-of-Custody Procedures
1.3 Sample Receiving Procedures
1.4 Sample Tracking Procedures . ./. ./. . . •/. / F-3
SECTION 2 DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES
2.1 Preprinted Laboratory Forms and Logbooks . ">\. p-4
2.2 Consistency of Documentation 7X. . /"X f--5
2.3 Document Numbering and
2.4 Storage of EPA Files
2.5 Shipping Data Packages
SECTION 3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCED
3.1 Specifications fo_r—Written SOPs
3.2 Handling of Confidential
-------
Exhibit F
SOW
XXX - Ambient Air
or from the
tion effort is
he following
le tracking
SECTION 1
• . SAMPLE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
A sample is physical evidence collected from a
environment. An essential part of hazardous waste
that the evidence gathered be controlled. To acco;
sample identification, chain-of-custody, sample r
procedures have been established.
1.1 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
1.1.1 To assure traceability of samples while ifn possession of the
Contractor, the Contractor shall have a specif/ed meth/d l?or maintaining
identification of samples throughout the l4bo/atory.
1.1.2 Each sample and sample preparationvconta^iner/shall be labeled with the
EPA number or a unique laboratory identifier-*. If a unique laboratory
identifier is used, it shall be cross-referencettsj:o tfes^EPA number.
;ted, the custody of EPA
Llected until they
;ractor shall have
iintained and documented.
1.2 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES
1.2.1 Because of the nature of rfie data being""
samples must be traceable from the
are introduced as evidence in legal\pro\eeding^.
procedures ensuring that EPA sample c\
1.2.2 A sample is under custody if the following applies:
• It is in your posse^ssToTr>^or
• It is in your view af-td^beiNng in your\posCession, or
• It was in your/pos/ess ion janoyou^iocked^t up, or
• It is in a deysigiteted sec/ire/^ire^N^secure areas shall be accessible to
authorized p,ersWnnel only) ./
1.3 SAMPLE RECEIVING^PROCEDT:
1.3.1 The Contractor shall'
receiving all
a sample custodian responsible for
1.3.2 The Loneractor sna^U. designate a representative to receive samples in
the event/that the sample custodian is not available.The condition of the
shipping /containers and sample bottles shall be inspected upon receipt by the
sample jmstAiian or his/her representative.
1.3.3 Thexcondibion of the custody seals (intact/not intact) shall be
inspected upahxjrecei>i^by th4 s/ample custodian or his/her representative.
July, 1991
Page F - 1
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
1.3.4 The sample custodian or his/her representative sh
presence or absence of the following documents accompany'
shipment: ' •
• Airbills or airbill stickers;
• Custody seals;
• EPA custody records;.
• EPA traffic reports or SAS packing lis/s.;
• Sample tags.
leek for the
''the sample
md
1.3.5 The sample custodian or his/her
forms (e.g., custody records, traffic repo
accompanying the samples at the time of sampl
or"
ill sign and date all
*g lists, and airbills)
eceipt
1.3.6 The Contractor shall contact SMO to resolve
such as absent documents, conflicting information, broket
unsatisfactory sample condition (e
1.3.7 The Contractor shall record
problems on Telephone Contact Logs.
sample bottD
1.3.8 The following information shall
by the sample custodian or his/her repres
inspected:
• Condition of the
Presence or absen
sample contai
Custody sealaumbe
Condition of the s
and problems
dy seals, and
ancies and
on appropriate Form AADC-1
.ve as samples are received and
ody seals on shipping and/or
Presence
of airbills ^dr airbill stickers;
numbers ;
EPA custody records;
traffic reports or SAS packing lists;
s-ample tags;
July, 1991
Page F - 2
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Sample tag identification numbers cross-referenced to the EPA sample
numbers.
Verification of agreement or non-agreement of ipttor/nation recorded on
shipping documents and sample containers; and
1.4
Problems or discrepancies.
SAMPLE TRACKING PROCEDURES
1.4.1 The Contractor shall maintain records documenting all phases
handling from receipt to final analysis. The/reoords shall include
documentation of the movement of samples and/prepared samples into and out of
designated laboratory storage areas.
July, 1991
Page F - 3
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 2
DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES
The goal of the laboratory document control
all documents for a specified Sample Delivery Gro
for when the project is completed. Accountable
laboratories shall include but not be limited t<
records, sample work sheets, bench sheets,' and/otber documents relating""^ the
sample or sample analyses. The following docjkerit control procedures have
been established to assure that all laboratory Records ^reassembled and
stored for delivery to the EPA or are avail4bl/ upon r/qu/st from the EPA
prior to the delivery schedule.
2.1 PREPRINTED LABORATORY FORMS AND LOGBO*
2.1.1 All documents produced by the Contractor^whi^h a^fexdirectly related to
the preparation and analysis of EPA samples shall be^bme th~exproperty of the
EPA and shall be placed in the comnlgtesample deliveryg^oupytile (CSF). All
observations and results recorded by thTT^b^tatorybut notSta preprinted
laboratory forms shall be enter edWt^p«riaanentlaBora€«r5t logbooks. When
all data from a SDG are compiled, aU. ^iginTr-^abor^tory^orms and copies of
all SDG-related logbook entries shall\be\4.ncluxled/inthe~~6locumentation
package.
2.1.2 The Contractor shall identify the
documents which is directly-fela-ted to
samples.
2.1.3 Pre-printed
and be dated (month/'
performing the activ,
labpracory foi
ay /year ) and/ sit
.ty/at the time /an aci
ty recorded on all laboratory
•ation and analysis of EPA
the name of the laboratory
rperson responsible for
is performed.
2.1.4 Logbook entrti
person responsible for
performed.
2.1.5 Logbook^entries
with the except Lerfr"o1
only one SDX3 p^r page.
shal
^ ited (month/day/year) and signed by the
rformine the activity at the time an activity is
irr-
be
trumejit run
^logical order. Entries in logbooks,
and extraction logs, shall include
2.1.6
numberec
in both bound ana unpound logbooks shall be sequentially
2.1.7 Instrument tun logs shalybe maintained so as to enable a
reconstruction o^the run sequence of individual instruments. Because the
laboratory must provide cbpies/of the instrument run logs to the EPA, the
July, 1991
Page F - 4
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Laboratory may exercise the option of using only laboratory or EPA sample
identification numbers in the Logs for sample ID rather charfr government agencv
or'commercial client names to preserve the confidentiality/of commercial
clients.
2.1.8 Corrections to supporting documents and raw d£ta sfia^l be made by
drawing a single line through the error and entering tWexcorr^st information.
Corrections and additions to supporting documents/and/raw oa^a sha^Ll be dated
and initialed. No information shall be obliterated /r renderebXunre^iable.
All notations shall be recorded in ink. Unused/options of documents stia-U be
"z'd" out.
2.2 CONSISTENCY OF DOCUMENTATION
2.2.1 The Contractor shall assign a doci
the organization and assembly of the CSF.
pent/control/officer responsible for
2.2.2 All copies of laboratory documents shalL be coi&pLete and legible.
2.2.3 Before releasing analytical results, the docmnent^xmtrol officer
shall assemble and cross-check the information on samite tags^y custody
records, lab bench sheets, persona^T~an«i-4%ns,trument logs/^a^ytother relevant
data to ensure that data pertaining to eachpa?tri«ularsample or sample
delivery group is consistent throughoSj~~Che—CSF.
2.3 DOCUMENT NUMBERING AND INVENTORY\PROlSEDt
\ V /
2.3.1 In order to provide document accountability of the completed analysis
records, each item in a CSFshall be inventoried and assigned a serialized
number as described in E>^IibitB>\Section 2\
CSF # - Region - Serialized number
*xample\ /75-2-0240).
2.3.2 All documents/relevant to/ea
logbook pages, bencft sheets,
re-preparation records ,i?e-an£
analysis, custody recfc
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
es packages to the
containers placed
seal. The
& method
2.5 SHIPPING DATA PACKAGES AND CSF
2.5.1 The Contractor shall document shipment of delive
recipients. These shipment's require custody seals on
such that they cannot be opened without damaging or
Contractor shall document what was sent, to whom,
(carrier) used.
2.5.2 The Contractor shall purge the CSF delive
Region 180 days after the report submission. '
2.5.3 A copy of the transmittal letter for
and the SMO.
2.5.4 The Document Control form is used
inspection of shipping containers and sampl
one (1) original FORM AADC-1 for each shipping^
2.5.5 The Contractor shall sign and date the airbill
the shipping containers, record the/_j>resence or absence
their conditions.
2.5.6 The Contractor shall note an;
instructions explained in Exhibit B,
receipt and
ractor shall submit
ent), examine
ody seals and
es and follow the
2.5.7 The Contractor shall submit a co
each SDG package.
ocument Control Form with
July, 1991
Page F - 6
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
SECTION 3
• • STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
The Contractor must have written standard operating/procedures (SOPs)
for receipt of samples, maintenance of custody, sample iden^f ication, sample
storage, tracking the analysis of samples, and asse^bly^ofcomHeted data.
3.1 SPECIFICATIONS FOR WRITTEN STANDARD OPERATING/PRtKIEDURES
3.1.1 An SOP is defined as a written narrativ
laboratory operating procedures including ex
documentation. The SOPs must accurately des
in the laboratory, and copies of the writte
appropriate laboratory personnel. These
that analytical data produced under this
EPA enforcement case preparation and
al
p -by- step descriptiTt
of laboratory
procedures used
available to the
cessary to ensure
ep table for use in
3.1.2 The Contractor's SOPs shall provide
meet each of the following specifications and
basis for laboratory evidence audits. The Contractor
standard oper-.ring procedures (SOPz
• Sample receipt and logging;
• Sample storage;
• Preventing sample contamination;
• Security for labor;
• Traceability of
• Maintaining iristi
• Sample anal]
• Glassware-cleaning>
documentation to
by EPA as the
written
Technic
packa
laboratory operation and data
tually-required quality assurance and
.ch individual data package;
ing, and reporting;
Chain-di<
July, 1991
Page F - 7
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
• Document control, including Case file preparation.
ian responsible
er duties and
ing in of
3.1.6 The
on any particu
July, 1991
3.1.3 The Contractor shall have a designated sample
for receipt of samples and have written SOPs describir
responsibilities.
3.1.4 The Contractor shall have written SOPs for
the samples. The procedures shall include but noi
the following information:
• Presence or absence of EPA chain-of-cu<
• Presence or absence of airbills or aifrbi
• Presence or absence of EPA Traffic/Repc
^*X^ "** /
• Presence or absence of custody seals ohxshippiqfe and/or sample
containers and their condition;
• Custody seal numbers, when present;
• Presence or absence of sam-
• Sample tag ID numbers;
• Condition of the shipping contai
• Condition of the s
• Verification of
documents and s
• Resolution of
Office; and
• The definition
receipt.
3.1.5 The ConJ
of samples af
and laboratory
storage
sample cor
who have/ace
jntainer;
rvonagreemeHt o^E information on receiving
frith the Sample Management
its used to describe sample condition upon
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
A description of the documentation used to record
sample storage, sample transfers, sample preparat
ample receipt,
and sample
A description of the documentation used to re
calibration and other QA/QC activities; and
• Examples of the document formats and labor
the sample receipt, sample storage, sampl
analyses.
3.1.7 The Contractor shall have written SOP<
of EPA samples throughout the laboratory.
used in
maintaining identification
3.1.8 If the Contractor assigns unique laboratory ide'nt/f iers, written SOPs
shall include a description of the method7 us^d to as£ig/the unique laboratory
identifier and cross-reference to the EPA^sampie. nufabe/
3.1.9 If the Contractor uses prefixes or suffixes ifNaddition to sample-
identification numbers, .the written SOPs shall inc^de their definitions
The Contractor shall have written SOPs describing the^method^y which the
laboratory maintains samples undei
3.1.10 The Contractor shall have
of all documents relating to each
review. Documents shall be filed on
must ensure that all documents includr
records, chromatographic charts, compute^
correspondence, and any other written doc
are compiled in one location
document numbering and
se
56-
ubmission
cedure,
3.1.11 The Contractor/sh
3.1.12 The Contrac
in preparing and
3.1.13 The Contractor
sample analysis QA/QC.
3 . 2 HANDLI
3.2.1 A. 06nt.
designate^ c
must be/ha
contra
conf identl
_for organisation and assembly
inical and managerial
fie basis. The procedures
pages, sample tracking
printouts , raw data summaries,
having reference to the Case
iPA. The system must include a
laboratory safety.
for cleaning of glassware used
under this contract.
SOPs for traceability of standards used in
L INF'
ON
ork under this contract may receive EPA-
nation from the Agency. Confidential information
i>m other documentation developed under this
:omplish thisl the following procedures for the handling of
Cmation have7 been established.
July, 1991
Page F - 9
-------
Exhibit F
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
3.2.2 All confidential documents shall be under the supei
designated Document Control Officer (DCO).
rion of a
3.2.3 Any samples or information received with a request^of confidentiality
shall be handled as "confidential." A separate locked filesiiall be
maintained to store this information and shall be
nonconfidential information. Data generated from
be treated as confidential. Upon receipt of conf
logs these documents into a Confidential Invent
then made available to authorized personnel bu
out to that person by the DCO. The documents/s
file at the conclusion of each working day.
be reproduced except upon approval by the E
will enter all copies into the document co;
information may not be disposed of excep
Officer. The DCO shall remove and retain
information disposed of for one year and shal
disposition in the Confidential Inventory Log
Figure 1
Bother
shall
/tial information/^she DCO
3g. The informais^on i<
ly after it has been sighed
1 be returned to the locked
.formation may not
'fficer. The DCO
addition, this
ipproyalfiy the EPA Contracting
of any confidential
ecord of the
Document Control #*
232-2-
232-2-
232-2-
232-2-
232-2-
232-2-
232-2-
232-2-
etc.
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
0008
Inventory Sheet
Recorc
.eports
:a Summary Sheets
btebook Pages
Instrument Logbook Pages
.edxm each set of documents.
# Pages
1
2
2
50
10
10
14
12
etc.
July, 1991
Page F - 10
-------
EXHIBIT G
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
through a
EXHIBIT G
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Absorbance - A measure of the decrease in incident light
sample into the detector. It is defined mathematic.
A = I(solvent)
I(solution)
Where, I = radiation i/nte/isity
Aliquot - A measured portion of a field sample/taken f$*r ^halysis.
Analysis Date/Time - The date and military tifae (24-tfou]/ clock) of the
introduction of the sample, standard, orx^lank^into/the; analysis system.
Analysis Group - An analysis group is a set ofno more^han twenty analytical
samples (as defined below) for the purpose of methb<0uail> at a minimum,
prepared and analyzed at a f requen£y-e£_o_nce per twenty ahalv/tical samples.
Analysis Replicate - A single anaIytiS5l~-3enip4.e pressed
preparation method and analyzed in^epricate. /
zough the analytical
Analysis Run - The actual instrumental^anal^is/of the sample preparations
from the time of instrument calibration \hrougji the running of the final CCV.
All sample preparation analyses during theXana^ysis run are subject to the QC
protocols set forth in Exhibit t>3k£ this con^rac^ unless otherwise specified
in the individual methoc
Analysis Spike Sample /
preparation method ana
Analyte - The element o
interest.
Analytical Preparation - An
preparation me
Analytical
fusion, et
from its ;nat
suitable
cal sampis. tak¥n through the analytical
prlot\to analysis.
lysis seeks to determine; the element of
sample taken through the analytical
preparation or sample preparation.
A method (digestion, dilution, extraction,
r otherwise release the analyte(s) of interest
1 solution containing the analyte which is
analysis methods.
July, 1991
Page G - 3
-------
Exhibit G
SOU No. XXX - Ambient Air
Analytical Sample - Any solution or media introduced int
which an analysis is performed excluding instrument cal
calibration verification, initial calibration blank,
verification and continuing calibration blank. Note
defined as analytical samples: undiluted and dilute
EPA), predigestion spike samples, duplicate sampl
analytical spike samples, post-digestion spike s
samples (ICS), CRQL standard for AA (CRA), CRQL s
laboratory control sample (LCS), preparation bl
analysis sample (LRS).
'instrument on
"ion, initial
•iuing calibration
Allowing are all
JEPA and non-
samples ,
:heck
Analytical Spike - A post-digestion spike to/be/prepare
adding a known quantity of the analyte to an aliquot of t
The unspiked sample aliquot must compensate f^r any
samples by addition of ASTM Type II wate
volume of the spiking solution added must
sample volume.
ior to analysis by
prepared sample.
change in the spike
.e unsjiike'd sample aliquot. The
101% of the analytical
ASTM Type II Water - Distilled water with a conductivity ofNLess than 1.0
^mho/cm at 25°C. For additional sp/ecj.fications refer toN^STM^)1193-77,
"Standard Specification for Reager
o.
inten
Calibration - The estao
absorbance, emission
standards. Calibj^a-&iotxj)roce
this SOW. Refer to the
method.
Autozero - Zeroing the instrument
to running a standard blank with the
Average Intensity - The average of two di,ff€
Background Correction - A £ettfirriqjie to comp>
contribution to the inst
Batch - A group of s
Breakthrough volume
will be initially
It is equivalent
injections (exposures).
for variable background
ination of trace elements.
.me.
Calibration B
acidified/ wi,
reagent
preparat
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Calibration Standards - A series of known standard solutions used by the
analyst for calibration of the instrument (i.e., preparation^of the analytical
curve). The solutions are not subjected to the preparaGlon/method but contain
the same matrix as the sample preparations to be analysed./
Lenient standard
of the
performance du^ng the
lire of theNs^librl
£nts being meastnted
ird and the standar'd^mvtst
ild have a concentration in
on
Calibration Verification (CCV) - A single element or/multi^
solution prepared by the analyst to be used to veri/y
instrument calibration with time and the instrumei
analysis of samples. The CCV can either be one
standards and/or an ICV. However, all analyte
particular system must be represented in this i'tar
have the same matrix as the samples. The CCV/shc
the middle of the calibrated range. Analytical /standaroS~run every 10
analytical samples or every 2 hours, whichever/is more/frequent, to verify the
calibration of the analytical system.
Case - A finite, usually predetermined number of\sample/s collected over a
given time period, from a particular site. Ca^e numbe/s are assigned by the
Sample Management Office. A Case consists of orte^pr nib-re Sample Delivery
Groups.
Coefficient of Variation (CV) - I
arithmetic mean.
Continuing Calibration - Analytical
verify the calibration of the analyti
deviation as
Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CR
acceptable under the contracj Statement o
more) times the standard ^eviatioh\of seven
blank.
jrcent of the
every 12 hours to
Inimum level of quantitation
Generally defined as 3.3 (or
cate analyses of the method
Control Limits - A rangeywithin which specified measurement results must fall
to be compliant. Control limits/ma^be^tsandata^y, requiring corrective action
if exceeded, or adv/soc4, requi/ins^that nohsompliant data be flagged.
Correlation Coefficient. - A tvamber (r) which indicates the degree of
dependence between two var
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Day - Unless otherwise specified, day shall mean calendar/day.
DDI'- Deionized Distilled water.
Deuterated Chemicals - Those chemicals which contain
isotope that is twice the mass of hydrogen); used a
quality assurance.
Digestion Log - An official record of the sample
(hydrogen
stem
:lcer
Dissolved Metals - Analyte elements which
analysis and which will pass through a 0.45
Dry Weight - The weight of a sample based ^n pfercent
drying in an oven.
been digested prior to
?
.s. The weight after
Duplicate - A second aliquot of a sample that^is trea'
original sample in order to determine the precisi
Zed the same as the
method.
Dynamic Calibration - Calibration of an analytical systebKusing calibration
gas standard concentrations in a f
to be analyzed and by introducing
sampling or analytical system in a
or analytical process.
Dynamic Dilution - Means of preparing ca^3
gas(es) from pressurized cylinders are coi
zero air in a manifold so that-allowing
available at the inlet of/the
l__pr very sim
External
to sample
EBCDIC - Extended Bina:
Exposure - A full me
concentration of the' a;
manner that meets t;
peak scan.
r to the samples
inlet of the
,e normal sampling
tipn mixtures in which standard
lly blended with humidified
of calibration mixture is
Code.
,e of an analyte from which the
in the exitation system in a
tion limit. It is also referred to as a
S tandards
anal
Extractable
the sampl
semi-vol
Field B
Field Sample
in single or multi
at a known concentration prior
factors.
be partitioned into an organic solvent from
to gas chromatography. Extractables include
mpounds.
from the field identified as a blank.
zrial received to be analyzed that is contained
and identified by a unique EPA Sample Number.
July, 1991
Page G - 6
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Flame Atomic Absorption (AA) - Atomic absorption which -ut^izes flame for
excitation.
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption (GFAA) - Atomic abs
graphite cell for excitation.
Holding Time - The elapsed time expressed in days
the sample by the Contractor until the date of it
Independent Standard - A contractor-prepared stj
composed of analytes from a different source
for the initial calibration.
on which utilizes a
receipt of
those used in the
rds
Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) - A technique/for the/simultaneous or
sequential multi-element determination of/feleinents in/solution. The basis of
the method is the measurement of atomic emission by An optical spectroscopic
technique. Characteristic atomic line emissiort^pedtr/ are produced by
excitation of the sample in a radio frequencJy^inducti^rely coupled plasma.
In-House - At the Contractor's facility.
Initial Calibration - Analysis ofy
different specified concentratior
range of the response of the anal}
il standards for-^/series of
used to define—thglinearity and dynamic
;icaj~~iftst*ument to the~~j£arget analytes.
Initial Calibration Verification (ICV\ -^olu^ionCs) obtained from the EPA or
prepared from stock standard solutions\metxa4s hr. salts obtained from a source
separate from that (those) utilized to prepare/the calibration standards, and
that have known concentratioji-jcalues. The\ICV\is used to verify the
concentration of the calitfration5±andards and the adequacy of the instrument
calibration of the calibrat>on-~-startdards and \he \dequacy of the instrument
calibration. The ICV fs not res\ri
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Interferents - Substances which affect the analysis for phe/lement of
interest.
Internal Standards - Analytes added to every standard/ blfenk, sample (for
VOAs), and sample extract (for semi-volatiles) at a Ifcnown concentration, prior
to analysis. Internal standards are used as the ba/is/f^auanbitation of the
target analysis. ' ' ^^ ^^
Laboratory - Synonymous with Contractor as used/herein.
Laboratory Control Sample - Aliquot spiked
specific analytes and subjected to the entir,
monitor method and contractor performance.
Laboratory Receipt Date - The date on whi
Contractor's facility, as recorded on the
sample Traffic Report. Also referred to as
receipt).
lown concentration of
'ocedure in order to
received at the
ivery receipt and
dated time of sample
Linear Range - The concentration range over which the arta^ytiokl curve remains
linear. The range of the instrumefttto?—*-sp£cific analyte>As determined
using calibration standards. The\upp^tjj.mit of~~tRrs-ii4Qear range (determined
at each analysis) is the highest c^ce\tratiOTi--^alibration7standard that has a
determined value within 10% of the khownXvalue/
Mass Spectral Interference - Defined asXthe^inability to detect the internal
standard quantification ion due to preserve of/high levels of mass spectral
"noise" at the same mass.
Matrix - The predominan
composed.
Matrix Modifier - S
interf erents, visco
Matrix Spike - Aliquot
specific analytes and subfec.ted
indicate the appropriateness
recovery
Mega®-bore
narrow bo
which the\sam>le to be analyzed is
effects of chemical
Method
method
concentrati
e fortified (spiked) with known quantities of
the entire analytical procedure in order to
thod for the matrix by measuring
of capillary columns, the other being the
target compounds under this SOW.
by performing the analytical preparation
ample. The solution thus contains the same
other analytical preparations plus any
July, 1991
Page G - 8
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
impurities derived from the preparation process. For preparations containing
reagents of variable concentrations, the method blank shoXild^match the maximum
reagent concentration used in the sample preparation(s)
Method of Standard Additions (MSA) - The addition of / increments of a
standard solution (spikes) to sample aliquots of the/same rize. Measurements
are made on the original and after each addition. jihe/sS^pe, x^intercept and
y-intercept are determined by least-square analys
concentration is determined by the absolute valu
Ideally, the spike volume is low relative to th<
10% of the volume). MSA may counteract matrix/ef
spectral effects. Also referred to as Standard
e atialyte
of/the x-inte"i£ceptr
pie volume (app\The metVtod detection limit for
metals is t 99 times the standard deviation of ser^en meTshod blank analyses.
Of course, all spectral background techniques mustbe operative and the same
integration times must be utilized as when actual sampl-e^ are">analyzed.
MS-SCAN - The gas chromatograph (,
where the instrument is programme
to disregard all others.
Narrative (SDG Narrative) - Portion
laboratory, contract, SDG and sample numt
documentation of any problems encountered
with corrective action ta^en andproblem
specifications are
Narrow-Bore Capillary/Co
the wide-bore (Mega-
under this SOW.
Performance Evaluatia
pesticides/PCBs under
Performance Ev,
EPA for Cont
Preparati
inorgani
reagent
and an.
.ass selective detector
target analytes and
package which includes
ntification, and descriptive
the samples, along
on. Complete SDG Narrative
illary columns, the other being
the analysis of compounds
-/The continuing calibration standard for
,ample of known composition provided by
'A to evaluate Contractor performance.
procedure, and method blank) - For
that contains distilled, deionized water and
the entire analytical procedure (digested
July, 1991
Page G - 9
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Preparation Log - An official record of the sample preparation (digestion).
Protocol - A compilation of the procedures to be folio;
sample receipt and handling, analytical methods, data,
deliverables, and document control. Used synonymo
(SOW).
Qualitative Accuracy - The ability of an analytic
identify compounds.
respect to
and
tement of Work
Quality Control (QC) Check Sample - A sample
of analytes that is analyzed by a laboratory
acceptable identifications and measurement
analyze environmental samples containing
Analyte concentrations are known by the
sample by a laboratory or standard supplie
performing the analysis is highly desirable.
Quality Control Set - A group of 10 analytical sampl
that bracket those samples.
Quantitative Accuracy - The abili
measure the concentration of an ide*
Reconstructed Ion Chromatogram (RIC) -
representation of the separation achiev
total ion current versus retention time
Recovery - A determinate
comparing measured valuers
spike values. Recovery isdetermine1
%Surrog
Relative Response Facto
response of an analyte co
Factors are 'dete
calculation o
the following e
known concentrations
that it can obtain
to be used to
ar analytes.
pa/ation of the QC check
the laboratory
e CCVs and CCBs
to correctly
spectral graphical
as chromatograph; a plot of
analytical procedure made by
sample against the known
iwing equation:
x 100*
A measure of the relative mass spectral
its internal standard. Relative Response
analysis ofxstandards and are used in the
of analyte)s in samples. RRF is determined by
July, 1991
Page G - 10
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Where
A = area of the characteristic ion measured
C ?= concentration
is = internal-standard
x - analvte of interest
Resolution - Also termed separation, the separatio
chromatogram, calculated by dividing the height o
peaks by the peak height of the smaller peak bei
100.
Retention Time (RT) - The time to elute a spec^ifLfe chemical from a
chromatographic column for a specific carrie/ gas flow tf*ute, measured from the
time the chemical is injected into the gas ptrpam untij: ips maximum
concentration appears at the detector.
Retention Time Window - Retention time wndow i^xde/6erm'ined for each analyte
of interest and is the time from injection co^elution/of a specific chemical
from a chromatographic column. The window is a&tsrminfed by three injections
of a single component standard over a 24-hour pericJd^as plus or minus three
times the standard deviation of-the absolute retention^time rr that analyte.
Rounding Rules - If the figure following
the figure : . dropped, and the retlaine~
example, 11.-,43 is rounded off to 1J
is less than 5,
are keptHSchanged. As an
If the figure following those to be re
dropped, and the last retained figure is
is rounded off to 11.45.
ine^oy is/greater than 5, the figure is
raise/a by 1. As an example, 11.446
If the figure following
other than zeros beyon
figure retained is increased by
unchanged if an even/n
while 11.425 is rou/ded/off to
five,
As/
i retained \s 5\ and if there are no figures
jure 5\s/dropped, and the last-place
odd number or it is kept
1T7435 is rounded off to 11.44,
If a series of multipte>oper^ioris is to be performed (add, subtract, divide,
multiply), all figures ar>xcarrrad through the calculations. Then the final
answer is rounded_to _the prop«r^ nuniber of significant figures.
See forms in.
Run - A co/iti
associataa qi/ality
Stateme
sxceptions.
sequence consisting of prepared samples and all
eaaurements as required by the contract
July, 1991
Page G - 11
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Sample - A portion of material to be analyzed that is co
multiple containers and identified by a unique sample n
Sample Delivery Group (SDG) - A unit within a sample
identify a group of samples for delivery. An SDG is
samples within a Case, received over a period of up
from all samples in an SDG are due concurrently.
defined by one of the following, whichever occurs
Case; or
Each 20 samples within a Case; or
Each 14-day calendar period duri
received, beginning with rece/pt
or SDG.
.ed in single or
hat is used to
20 or fewer
days. Data
oup is
in a Case are
sample in the Case
nple collection method
jother).
iber designated
ample Traffic
Samples may be assigned to Sample Delivery
(i.e., all Tenax® tubes in one SDG, all canis
Sample Number (EPA Sample Number) - A unique identifi"
by EPA for each sample. The EPA Sample Number appears
Report which documents information/ontEa'
\ \
Sample Recovery (SR) - The quantity\of^a compotrant/_measured/ in a sample as
compared to a known quantity of an isotoplcall/ lifoeleor~cTHnpound injected
directly onto the same Tenax® cartridge^.
Selected Ion Current Profile (SICP) - A pi
number for ions of a speci£iett~Tnass.
of ion abundance vs. time or scan
Semi-volatile Compounds/- Targe~fr\conk>ounds with\normal vapor pressures between
1 x 10'1 and I x 10'7 mn/ He/ and whicKaTeNamenabl/ to analysis by SOW Method
2.
Serial Dilution - Tfte dfy.ution 6f a7 sample by~~4 known factor. When corrected
by the dilution facbar, tnV^dilute^i sample must agree with the original
undiluted sample within^-specifie^ limits. Serial dilution may reflect the
influence of interferents.
Standard Anal;
target compoj/ndsy
Static Ca
concentr
cylinde
ticar^determination made with known quantities of
,rmine rteejkmse factors.
of an analytical system with known
as\ obtained from a source such as gas
d stock solutions.
July, 1991
Page G - 12
-------
Exhibit G
SOW No. XXX - Ambient Air
Stock Solution - A standard solution which can be diluted
standards.
Surrogates (Surrogate Standard) - Compounds added to e
matrix spike, matrix spike duplicate, and standard; u.
analytical efficiency by measuring recovery. Surro
fluorinated, or isotopically labelled compounds not,
environmental media.
derive other
blank, sample,
evaluate
brominated,
detected in
Tentatively Identified Compounds (TIC) - Compour
are not target compounds, internal standards oy s\.
peaks are subjected to mass spectral library /ear^hes for tentative
identification.
Time - When required to record time on any/deliverable7 ipem, time shall be
expressed as Military Time, i.e., a 24-hour
Total Metals - Analyte elements which have often digested prior to analysis.
Traffic Report (TR) - An EPA sample identificationiqrm fii^eol out by the
sampler, which accompanies the sample during shipment DSL the^aboratory and
which is used for documenting sampZe"~Cr>Rdij:ion and receipt^iiy the laboratory.
Twelve-Hour Time Period - The twelve Ol2T~fceuc_.time perio37for GC/MS system
tuning, standards .calibration (initial or contfnu±ng~~c«li]/ration) begins at
the moment of injection of the BFB analysis ttlat/the laboratory submits as
documentation of compliant tune. The ti,me\ieripd ends after 12 hours has
elapsed according to the system clock.
Validated Time of Sample Receipt "WTSR) - Tttedate on which a sample is
received at the Contractor's--£a 0.1 mm Hg,
:o analysis .toy SOW Methods 1A and/or IB.
Viewing Area AdjustmefttStandard / A solution containing a standard of a
strong atom line -(i .e. , CTai and ^weak ion line (e.g., Ba) used to verify the
proper adjustment of_the obsVsvatiolxheight in the plasma for metals analysis
by ICP (see Meth6d^200^2^B forSe_taiD
10% Frequen
allowing
verificat
cification during an analytical sequence
ytical samples between required calibration
ified by the contract Statement of Work.
July, 1991
Page G - 13
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
-------
-------