May 1988 EPA-700/8-88-049
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water
Task Force
Evaluation of
Mineral Research and
Development Corporation
Harrisburg, North Carolina
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
-------
<*
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (Pt-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
Chicago, ft 60604-3590
-------
October 24, 1988
Update of the Hazardous Waste Ground Water Task Evaluation
of Mineral Research and Development Corporation
Harrisburg, North Carolina
The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Hazardous Waste
Ground Water Task Force ("Task Force"), in conjunction with the North
Carolina Department of Human Resources (NCDHR), conducted an evaluation of
the ground water monitoring program at Mineral Research and Development
Corporation's (MRDC) Harrisburg plant. The on-site inspection was
conducted during March 15-20, 1987. MRDC facility is located
approximately two miles east of Harrisburg, North Carolina.
The purpose of the Task Force evaluation was to determine the adequacy of
MRDC's ground water monitoring program in regard to State and Federal
ground water monitoring requirements.
The Task Force evaluation verified that releases from MRDC's waste
management units had contaminated shallow and deep ground water beneath
the facility. Also, the evaluation found that MRCD's ground water
monitoring program did not fully comply with the regulatory standards
contained in 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart F and the State's counterpart
regulations, 10 NCAC 10F .0033.
On October 11, 1985, EPA issued to MRDC a Section 3008(a) Compliant and
Compliance Order that alleged that MRDC's ground water monitoring program
was inadequate. On March 23, 1988, MRDC and EPA entered into a Consent
Agreement and Final Order. This order requires MRDC to conduct additional
hydrogeologic study, to install additional monitoring wells and to pay a
$2400 civil penalty.
On March 30, 1988, NCDHR and EPA issued a joint Post-Closure Care Permit
to MRDC. This permit also requires MRDC to conduct additional
hydrogeologic study and to install additional monitoring wells.
Presently, MRDC is following schedules contained in the order and the
permit.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HAZARDOUS WASTE GROUND WATER TASK FORCE
GROUND WATER MONITORING EVALUATION
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Harrisburg, North Carolina
June 1988
Donald Hunter
Project Coordinator
Region IV, USEPA, Environmental Services Division
Athens, Georgia
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION 1
BACKGROUND 2
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT COMPLIANCE AND PERMITTING ACTIONS 2
Ground Water Compliance Summary 3
Post-Closure Permit Summary 3
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS i 4
Hydrogeological Characterization 5
Monitoring System : 5
Ground Water Quality Assessment 6
Laboratory Evaluation " 6
Monitoring Data Analysis 7
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS 7
TECHNICAL REPORT
INVESTIGATION METHODS 9
Records/Documents Review 9
Facility Inspection 9
Laboratory Evaluation 9
Ground Water Sampling and Analysis 10
Sampling Procedures 10
WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS/WASTE CHARACTERISTICS 12
Impoundment No. 1 12
Impoundment No. 2 12
Impoundment No. 3 12
Impoundment No. 4 12
Impoundment No. 5 13
Impoundment Closure 13
GEOLOGICAL/HYDROGEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION 14
Geology 14
General 14
Structural Geology 15
Hydrogeology 15
Area of Inadequacy in Characterizaton 16
INTERIM STATUS GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS 17
INTERIM STATUS GROUND WATER MONITORING - DETECTION 19
Ground Water Monitoring System 19
Well Construction 19
Monitoring Well Location 20
- i -
-------
INTERIM STATUS GROUND WATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT 22
Outline 22
Assessment Efforts 22
November 1982 22
January 1985 through Present 22
Inadequacy of Ground Water Quality Assessment 25
LABORATORY EVALUATION
Sampling, Preservation, Holding Times and Chain-of-Custody 26
Laboratory Sample Analysis 27
Quality Assurance and Data Documentation 27
Summary 28
TASK FORCE ANALYTICAL DATA EVALUATION ;. 29
Metals - Task Force 29
Total versus Dissolved Values -. 29
Silver 29
Arsenic 29
Barium 29
Beryllium 29
Cadmium 30
Cobalt 30
Chromium 30
Copper 30
Nickel 30
Lead 30
Vanadium 30
Zinc 31
Aluminum 31
Manganese 31
Calcium 31
Magnesium 31
Iron 32
Sodium 32
Potassium 32
Metals - Split Comparison 32
General Inorganic Parameters 32
Chloride 32
Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen 32
Sulfate 33
General Organic Parameters 33
Total Organic Carbon 33
Total Organic Halogen 33
Purgeable Organic Halogen 33
Selected Chlorinated Compounds 33
Extractable Organic Compounds 33
Purgeable Organic Compounds 33
Data Review Summary 34
REFERENCES 35
LIST OF FIGURES iii
LIST OF TABLES iii
LIST OF APPENDICES iii
- ii -
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
1 - Facility Location Map
2 - Facility Diagram
3 - Potentiometric Surface Map, Surficial Aquifer (Regolith),
Process Wells Off
4 - Potentiometric Surface Map, Surficial Aquifer (Regolith),
Process Wells On
5 - Resistivity Survey Map
6 - Plume Boundary Map (As Attributed to MRDC)
LIST OF TABLES
1 - Sampling Information Summary
2 - Sample Bottles and Preservatives -
3 - Ground Water Monitoring Parameters Evaluated During HWGWTF
Laboratory Audit
4 - Analytical Data Summary (Metals)
5 - Metals Data Summary (with Region IV Splits)
6 - Analytical Data Summary (All but Metals)
LIST OF APPENDICES
A - HWGWTF Field Sampling Data Sheets
B - HWGWTF Parameter List
C - EP Toxicity Analyses, Surface Impoundment Samples
D - MRDC Monitoring Well Construction Information
E - Complete HWGWTF Analytical Data
- iii -
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-------
INTRODUCTION
In the last several years, concerns have been raised about whether
hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities (TSDF's) are
complying with the ground water monitoring requirements promulgated under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). In question is the ability of
existing or proposed ground water monitoring systems to detect contaminant
releases from waste management units. To evaluate these systems and
determine the current compliance status, the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established a Hazardous Waste Ground
Water Task Force (Task Force). The Task Force comprises personnel from the
EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER), National
Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC), Regional Offices and State
regulatory agencies. The Task force is conducting in-depth on-site
investigations of TSDF's which are required to monitor ground water with the
following objectives:
• Determine compliance with interim status ground water monitoring
requirements of 40 CFR Part 265 as promulgated under RCRA or the State
equivalent (where the State has received RCRA authorization).
• Evaluate the ground water monitoring program described in the
facility' s RCRA Part B permit application for compliance with 40 CFR
Part 270.14(c).
• Determine if the ground water at the facility contains hazardous waste
constituents.
• Provide, for commercial facilities, information to assist the Agency
in determining if the TSDF meets EPA ground water monitoring
requirements for waste management facilities receiving waste from
response actions conducted under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, Public Law 91-510).
To address these objectives, each Task Force investigation will determine
if:
• The facility has developed and is following an adequate ground water
sampling and analysis plan
• Designated RCRA and/or State required monitoring wells are properly
located and constructed
• Required analyses have been conducted on samples from the designated
RCRA monitoring wells
• The ground water quality assessment program outline (or plan, as
appropriate) is adequate.
-------
During March 15-20, 1987, a Task Force team conducted an evaluation at
the Mineral Research and Development Corporation facility at Harrisburg,
North Carolina (Figure 1). The inspection was coordinated by US-EPA
Region IV, Environmental Services Division (ESD) and consisted of personnel
from the ESD, as well as US-EPA Headquarters, the US-EPA Region IV Residuals
Management Branch, the North Carolina Department of Human Resources (DHR),
and Versar, Inc., who was the sampling contractor for this evaluation. In
general, the inspection involved review of state, federal, and facility
records; facility inspection, laboratory evaluation and ground water sampling
and analyses.
BACKGROUND
Mineral Research and Development Corporation (MRDC) operates an inorganic
chemical formulation facility on a 101-acre tract located just south of North
Carolina Highway 49 at Rocky River. The plant is in Cabarrus County,
approximately two miles east of the Town of Harrisburg. The surrounding
area, particularly north of Rocky River, is zoned agricultural or
industrial. Some land, just across Rocky River from the facility, has been
recently rezoned rural/residential.
Rocky River, forming most of the southern boundary, is classified as a
Class C stream. In North Carolina, Class C streams are used for the
propagation of fish and wildlife, for secondary recreation and for agri-
cultural purposes. They are not used as sources of drinking water.
MRDC manufacturers approximately 60 million pounds of inorganic chemicals
at the Harrisburg facility annually. Three main product lines are produced:
arsenic acids and chromated copper arsenates, chlorides, and nitrates. These
products are used in a variety of industrial and agricultural applications.
The main production processes used at this plant are batch-type reactions.
The MRDC facility is registered as a generator and a treatment, storage,
and disposal facility for hazardous waste, and has been granted interim
status (EPA I.D. Number NCD048467427). The land disposal units for which the
facility was required to implement a RCRA ground water monitoring program are
three surface impoundments, identified as impoundments No. 1, 2 and 4 in
Figure 2. (1)
MRDC implemented a closure plan under interim status to effect closure of
impoundments No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Fall of 1986. Impoundment No. 5 will
remain in service as a non-hazardous settling basin. The post-closure Part B
was called by the State on May 31, 1984.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT COMPLIANCE AND PERMITTING ACTIONS
The following is a list of significant state and federal compliance and
permitting actions involving the MRDC facility. This summary was prepared
with the assistance of Region IV EPA and North Carolina DHR staff.
- 2 -
-------
Ground Water Compliance Summary
09/21/83 State ground water inspection; identified incomplete statistical
comparison. NOV issued to MRDC.
10/10/83 MRDC responds to above NOV with required information.
02/15/84 Region IV BSD conducts CME at MRDC; inadequacies cited include
inadequate cleaning procedures for bailers, improper sample
collection bottles, and an incomplete ground water quality
assessment. No formal response, but subsequent state inspections
indicate that all problems, except for assessment, were eventually
corrected.
03/06/84 State conducts ground water sampling overview inspection; also
notes improper sample bottles used, despite what the sampling and
analysis plan indicates. Notified facility with NOV on 03/29/84.
05/15/85 State denies MRDC's request to waive TOX analyses.
10/11/85 Region IV issued a complaint based on inadequate hydrogeological
characterization at MRDC facility.
04/29/86 State conducts CME at MRDC; no significant violations cited;
several "fine-tuning" suggestions relayed to facility via report
issued 08/25/86.
10/20/86 State issues revised CME report based on document correction
supplied by MRDC.
Post-Closure Permit Summary
05/31/84 Part B called.
07/01/85 MRDC requests extension for Part B submittal deadline.
08/16/85 State grants requested extension.
11/07/85 MRDC submits first version of Post-Closure Part B.
08/25/86 State issues NOD on Part B with consent order.
11/24/86 State comments on MRDC's NOD response.
12/29/86 MRDC submits revised Part B minus ground water portion.
02/04/87 MRDC submits further revised Part B.
- 3 -
-------
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Task force investigated the interim status ground water monitoring
program implemented by MRDC at the Harrisburg, North Carolina, facility. The
consensus opinion of the Task Force is that the program does not fully comply
with the standards at 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart F and the State's counterpart
regulations, 10 NCAC 10F.0033, which includes, by reference, the Codified
Federal Regulations.
This investigation revealed that MRDC has not adequately characterized
the hydrogeology of the site. Specifically, they have not conclusively
addressed the issue of ground water underflow beneath Rocky River.
(
The investigation also revealed inadequacies with the construction of the
monitoring wells, particularly regarding.procedures and materials used to
backfill annular space, surface pad construction, use of glued joints, and
flooding caused by the tops of casing at several wells being located below
flood stage of Rocky River.
Several monitoring wells were found to be located well beyond the waste
management area boundary circumscribing impoundments No. 2 through No. 4.
Using these wells, however, MRDC was able to detect contamination from these
units. Surface impoundment No. 1, located upgradient from the other
impoundments, is not adequately monitored. It should be monitored as a
separate regulated unit. There are only three wells located downgradient of
surface impoundment No. 1. Two of these are fractured bedrock wells, located
150-200 feet from the unit, and one is a shallow regolith well located
approximately 250 feet downgradient.
Several problems were also observed related to MRDC' s assessment
efforts. The assessment plan outline presented during the evaluation does
not appear to be the same outline reviewed by Region IV ESD during a 1984
CME. The facility is required to keep accurate and up-to-date records,
clearly indicating revisions. The assessment is also inadequate. It does
not identify the horizontal and vertical extent of the plume. A plume map,
included in the assessment, does not accurately depict the plume.
The Task Force identified several problems with MRDC' s sampling and
analysis plan (SAP). Field measurements are not being conducted, as
indicated, there are no deep well purging procedures, the Part B SAP does not
include a list of sample bottles nor does it address adequate chemical
preservation of samples. There are three different SAP's in existence at
this time, all of which contain at least some of the current procedures used
by MRDC personnel. None of the three are adequate.
The Task Force, based on analyses of samples collected during the
investigation, has determined (verified) that waste management operations at
the facility have contaminated shallow and deep ground water. The
contamination is primarily inorganic and is characterized by the presence of
the metals arsenic, barium, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, nickel, lead, zinc, as
well as elevated levels of chloride, nitrate-nitrite nitrogen, and sulfate.
A relatively small number of organic compounds were detected in these
samples, and these were detected at very low concentrations.
- 4 -
-------
The following is a more detailed summary of the inspection findings and
conclusions.
Hvdrogeological Characterization - 40 CFR Part 265.91
The hydrogeologic characterization provided for review included a
description of site characteristics, including general geology, structural
geology, ground water occurrence and hydraulic characteristics, and plum
characterization using surface resistivity. While the site characterization
is fairly thorough, it falls short in presuming there is no underflow of
ground water beneath Rocky River. Given the nature of the contaminants, and
the fact that these contaminants are known to have migrated at least to Rocky
River, the issue of underflow needs to be addressed scientifically, rather
than presumptively. This issue is particularly critical since a residential
development is planned for the area immediately across the river and the
development will depend on deep wells for its water supply.
Monitoring System - 40 CFR Part 265.91
Existing monitoring wells weren't constructed according to recognized
monitoring well construction standards. Specifically, 1) the annuli in the
wells was backfilled with cuttings, not cement or bentonite/cement grout,
2) cement was poured in the annulus above the sand pack for a seal, rather
than using bentonite pellets, 3) surface pads were generally inadequate
(either cracked and/or too small), 4) joints were glued, and 5) the tops of
several wells are below the flood level of Rocky River.
Several downgradient wells are located considerable distances (up to 250
feet) from the waste management units. Despite this fact, they appear to
have functioned as detection monitoring wells. Additional wells need to be
installed downgradient of impoundment No. 1 to detect and characterize
contamination in the regolith between impoundment No. 1 and the other
impoundments. Well P-2 and M-7 generally provide fractured bedrock ground
water quality downgradient of impoundment No. 1, but there are no wells in
the regolith for this purpose.
Inadequate Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) - 40 CFR Part 265.92
The Task Force review indicated several problems with MRDC's SAP.
Specifically, the following problems were identified:
• Several SAP's are currently on file at the facility, all of which
appear to contain a portion of the current procedures and which are
inadequate.
• Even though all of the SAP' s indicate that field personnel will
measure in situ parameters (pH, specific conductance, and
temperature), based on a review of field notes, they appear to be
measuring only temperature on a regular basis, and pH only
occasionally.
- 5 -
-------
• The SAP(' s) does not address specific procedures for purging the deep
wells. These do not have dedicated pumps, as do the shallow wells.
• The Part B SAP does not contain a list of sample bottles used during
sampling.
• The Part B SAP and the interim SAP do not require immediate chemical
preservation of applicable samples after their collection.
Ground Water Quality Assessment - 40 CFR Part 265.93
A ground water quality assessment outline, was presented for Task Force
review. It appears to have been created at some date after March 1985, but
was presented to show past compliance with the requirement to have an outline
on file by November 19, 1982 (one year after Che effective date of the ground
water monitoring requirements). This document is not the same document
presented to Region IV ESD during a CUE conducted at the facility in February
1984.
MRDC has failed to adequately characterize the horizontal and vertical
extent of the plume. The plume map presented in the assessment report shows
the eastern boundary of the plume located between wells M-5 and M-6, even
though monitoring data indicates that well M-6 has detected contamination,
and, therefore, should be included in the plume.
Laboratory Evaluation
The on-site and off-site laboratories were evaluated for their ability to
produce quality data for ground water monitoring parameters required by 40
CFR Part 265.92 and MRDC's assessment program. The on-site laboratory and
Environmental Testing, Incorporated, Charlotte, North Carolina, were the
subjects of laboratory audits. General Engineering Laboratories, Charleston,
South Carolina, and Environmental 1, Greenville, South Carolina, are both
South Carolina certified laboratories and were not evaluated.
Analytical equipment, sample handling, preservation techniques, methods
and quality assurance procedures were examined for adequacy. Laboratory
records were reviewed for completeness, accuracy, and compliance with State
and Federal requirements.
Based on the overall findings, the MRDC laboratories (on-site and
off-site) have the capability to provide acceptable quality data for the
ground water monitoring program. The following specific problems, however,
were identified.
• The samples for pH were analyzed thirty minutes to two hours after
collection. These must be analyzed immediately (within fifteen
minutes).
• The fecal coliform samples were collected in non-sterile containers
and one set of samples did not meet the holding time.
• Phenol samples were collected in plastic containers, instead of glass,
and were not preserved properly.
- 6 -
-------
• TOG samples were not preserved, as required.
• Even though the MRDC laboratory used the appropriate method for
specific conductance analysis, the instrument was not calibrated
daily, as required by the method.
• Samples for total recoverable metals were not digested prior to being
analyzed. The data from these analyses could be biased on the low
side.
• Approved methods were used for sulfate and nitrate procedures, but
when the indicated values were higher than the standard, the samples
were not diluted and re-run. This would cause a negative bias.-
• Although MRDC did not have a quality assurance plan, they were
developing one.
' • Most of the raw data, quality control records and calculations were
documented and maintained as required. Some standard curves were not
adequately labeled and dated.
Monitoring Data Analysis
The Task Force ground water data indicates that a contaminant plume,
primarily inorganic in character, is present in the regolith and fractured
bedrock beneath the site and extends at least to the Rocky River. The
inorganic constituents identified in the plume that are not present in the
upgradient well or are present in downgradient wells at significantly higher
concentrations than reported for the upgradient well include arsenic, barium,
cadmium, cobalt, chromium, nickel, lead, and zinc. Chloride, nitrite-nitrate
nitrogen, and sulfate values were also much higher in the affected
downgradient wells.
Only a few organic compounds were detected, at low concentrations, in two
of the downgradient wells. A specific origin can not be attributed to these
compounds.
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the above findings and conclusions, the Task Force has the
following recommendations.
1. In order to correct deficiencies with the hydrogeological characteriza-
tion, the Task Force recommends that MRDC, through a rigorous testing
procedure, demonstrate ground water flow patterns and discharge char-
acteristics adjacent to and along the affected length of Rocky River.
Ideally, several clusters of monitoring wells, designed to function as
piezometers, should be located north and south of Rocky River. These
wells would provide the necessary vertical head distribution and chem-
ical data needed to evaluate the question of underflow, as well as
address deficiencies with regard to defining the vertical and hori-
zontal extent of the plume identified at the site.
- 7 -
-------
If access to the property south of the river is not possible, the
facility should propose other methods,including, but not limited to,
dye injection studies, to confirm or repudiate their contention of "no
underflow" conditions.
2. The Task Force recommends that any new monitoring wells installed at
the MRDC facility be constructed according to accepted monitoring well
standards. The construction^specifications of these wells should be
approved,-prior to construction, by EPA or the State. All existing
wells should be retrofitted with adequate surface pads (at least three
feet square and six inches thick). Using the elevation survey data
provided by the Task Force during the evaluation, MRDC should raise
the elevation of the top of casing for all wells flooded prior to the
Task Force visit so that they will be above the April/March 1987 flood
elevation. /
3. The Task Force recommends installing additional regolith wells between
impoundment No. 1 and the other impoundments. These wells should be
constructed according to accepted monitoring well specifications and
should be screened to accommodate a seasonal fluctuation in water
levels. These wells should be located only after a current
potentiometric map has been developed for this site.
4. The Task Force recommends that MRDC reevaluate existing data and
redraw the plume map included in the assessment report.
5. To fully characterize the vertical and horizontal extent of contami-
nation of the facility, the Task Force recommends that MRDC install
additional monitoring wells and collect additional data.
6. The Task Force recommends that all existing SAP's be unified into a
single document and submitted to the appropriate regulatory agency for
review prior to implementation. With respect to problems identified
with the use of existing SAP's, the Task Force recommends that:
• MRDC sampling personnel immediately begin measuring pH, specific
conductance, and temperature during well purging and sampling.
• MRDC amend their plan to provide procedures for purging the deep
wells.
• MRDC amend their plan to include a list of the sample collection
bottles used.
• MRDC amend their plan to provide for chemical preservation of all
appropriate samples immediately after collection.
- 8 -
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT
-------
-------
INVESTIGATION METHODS
The Task Force investigation of the Mineral Research and Development
Corporation, Harrisburg, North Carolina, facility consisted of:
• Reviewing and evaluating records and documents from EPA Region IV, the
North Carolina Department of Human Resources (DHR) and MRDC,
• Conducting an on-site facility inspection March 16-17, 1987,
• Evaluating on-site and off-site analytical laboratories, and
• Sampling and analyzing data from selected ground water monitoring
wells and leachate collection sumps.
Records/Documents Review
Records and documents from EPA Region IV and the DHR offices, compiled
by PRC, an EPA contractor, were reviewed prior to and during the on-site
inspection. On-site facility records were reviewed to verify information
currently in Government files and supplement Government information where
necessary. Records were reviewed to obtain information on facility
operations and the ground water monitoring program.
Specific documents and records that were reviewed included the ground
water sampling and analysis plan(s), outline of the facility ground water
quality assessment program, reports issued after the ground water quality
assessment program was implemented, analytical results from past ground water
sampling, monitoring well construction data and logs, site geologic reports,
and site operations plans.
Facility Inspection
The facility inspection conducted in March 1987 included identifying
waste management units (past and present), waste management operations, and
verifying the location of ground water monitoring wells.
Company representatives were interviewed to identify records and
documents of interest, discuss the contents of the documents, and explain 1)
facility operations (past and present), 2) site hydrogeology, 3) the ground
water monitoring system, 4) the ground water sampling and analysis plan, and
5) laboratory procedures for obtaining data on ground water quality.
Laboratory Evaluation
The on-site and off-site laboratory facilities handling ground water
samples were evaluated regarding their respective responsibilities under the
MRDC ground water sampling and analysis plan. Analytical equipment and
methods, quality assurance procedures and records were examined for
adequacy. Laboratory records were inspected for completeness, accuracy and
compliance with State and Federal requirements. The ability of each
laboratory to produce quality data for the required analyses was also
evaluated.
- 9 -
-------
Ground Water Sampling and Analysis
During the inspection, Task Force personnel collected samples for
analysis from eight ground water monitoring wells. Table 1 contains a
summary of sampling data including date sampled, location of the well, and a
list of samples submitted for analyses at each well. The field data sheets
for each station, completed by Versar, are found in Appendix A. MRDC was
offered sequential duplicate splits of all ground water samples. They
requested splits only of samples for dissolved metals and selected inorganic
chemical analyses.
Sampling Procedures
The shallow wells are equipped with dedicated Well Wizard® bladder
pumps. The deep wells (Wells 6A and 7) did not contain pumps. These wells
were purged with a large diameter electric submersible pump.
Because of everyone's familiarity with the Well Wizard® control
units, MRDC, Versar, and EPA personnel operated the control equipment.
Versar personnel collected the samples. The following protocol describes the
procedures used at each well:
1. Versar determined the depth to water in each well and performed well
head air monitoring (i.e., H'NU, geiger counter).
2. Using the measured water level and recorded total depths for each
well, Task Force personnel calculated three water column volumes for
each well. Total depths could not be verified because of the
dedicated nature of the purging and sampling equipment in the wells.
3. The pumps, either the dedicated Well Wizard® in the shallow wells
or the deep submersibles, were activated. The shallow wells were
generally quickly evacuated to "dryness" (water level at pump
intake). Several of the shallow wells more or less kept up with the
pumping rate and were immediately available for sampling. The slower
recovery wells were monitored during the ensuing hours and were
sampled as water became available. The deep wells were purged a
minimum of three water column volumes and were sampled immediately.
Field measurements of in-situ parameters were obtained during sample
collection.
4. Versar collected all sample sets.
5. Samples-were placed on ice in coolers immediately after they were
collected.
6. Samples were transported back to the Versar truck where turbidity was
measured and appropriate samples were preserved (Table 2) .
8 Sample splits, as requested, were transferred to MRDC.
Quality control/quality assurance samples were prepared for this
evaluation as follows:
• Performance Evaluation Blank and Spike (with Internal Check Standard
for Metals Analyses)
- 10 -
-------
• One Field Blank
• One Bailer Blank
• One Pump Blank
• Duplicate Sample at Well No. 4
At the end of the day, samples were packaged for shipment to the two
EPA contract laboratories in accordance with applicable Department of
Transportation (DOT) regulations (40 CFR Parts 171-177). The Region IV
splits were maintained by Region IV personnel and transported by these
personnel to the Region IV laboratory after the evaluation was completed.
Ground water samples were considered "environmental samples" for shipping
purposes.
Samples were analyzed by the EPA contractor laboratories for the
parameter groups shown in Appendix B.
- 11 -
-------
WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS/WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
Prior to recent closure activities, MRDC operated five unlined surface
impoundments as a part of their on-site wastewater treatment system. These
impoundments are shown in Figure 2. Four of these impoundments (impoundments
No. 1, 2, 3, and 4) were closed or cleaned-up and retrofitted with a
synthetic liner under an approved interim status closure plan. Based on
analysis of sludge and sediment samples from these impoundments, included as
Appendix C to this report, impoundments No. 1, 2, and 4 were considered RCRA
hazardous waste management units. The following is a description of each
impoundment's hazardous or non-hazardous nature and its disposition and
current status.
Impoundment No. 1
Impoundment No. 1 was considered hazardous because of bottom samples
which failed the EP Toxicity test for arsenic. Concentrations as high as
7.21 ppm were detected in these samples. Sludge and contaminated soil was
removed from this impoundment and placed in impoundment No. 4. After the
clean-up of No. 1 was accomplished, it was retrofitted with a synthetic liner
and is currently being used as an emergency spill containment basin. The
size of the impoundment was reduced by approximately one-half during this
operation.
Impoundment No. 2
Impoundment No. 2 was considered hazardous because samples of sludge
collected from the bottom failed the EP Toxicity test for both cadmium and
lead. Cadmium concentrations ranged from 1.78 to 2.17 ppm and lead
concentrations ranged from 6.56 to 9.59 ppm. Sludge and contaminated soil
were removed from this impoundment and placed in impoundment No. 4. After
removal of this material it was closed collectively with impoundments No. 3
and 4.
Impoundment No. 3
Samples collected from impoundment No. 3 did not fail the EP Toxicity
test for any of the parameters. Even though this impoundment was not
considered hazardous by RCRA standards, soil and sludge from this impoundment
was chemically stabilized and the impoundment was closed with the fixated
waste remaining in place.
Impoundment No. 4
Impoundment No. 4 was considered hazardous because samples of sludge
collected from the bottom failed the EP Toxicity test for both cadmium and
lead. Cadmium concentrations ranged from 2.56 to 3.20 ppm and lead
concentrations ranged from 3.74 to 23.0 ppm. All hazardous waste contained
in impoundment No. 4, including the sludge and soil from impoundments No. 1
and 2, was chemically fixed and left in place. After fixation, the material
was graded and covered with compacted clay from an on-site location to
approved specifications. The surface was seeded to establish a vegetative
cover.
- 12 -
-------
Impoundment No. 5
Impoundment No. 5 is considered a non-hazardous impoundment. None of the
samples collected from a total of 16 stations exceeded any of the EP Toxicity
maximum concentration limits. This impoundment is still in service as a
settling basin.
Impoundment Closure
The closure plan under which the above described closure was implemented
was approved by DHR on September 30, 1986, with actual work beginning in
December 1986. Most work was completed in February 1987 and the closure was
certified in March 1987.
- 13 -
-------
GEOLOGICAL/HYDROGEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION
The geological and hydrogeological characterization of the MRDC site is
contained primarily in six documents prepared for the facility. These
documents are listed below, with a description of the aspects of the geology
and hydrogeology included in each.
• "Report of Hydrogeological Investigation, Mineral Research and
Development Co." - This report contains an identification of
pollutants observed in both ground and surface water at the site, as
well as a description of surface and ground water regimes. (2)
• "Geologic Setting of the Mineral Research and Development Corp. Plant
Site, Harrisburg, N.C." - This report provides a description of the
various rock types encountered locally, as well as discussions of
weathering, structural geology, ground water recharge and discharge
areas, aquifer properties, ground water flow directions and the
, extents of observed contaminant plumes. (3)
• "MRDC RCRA Post-Closure Part B Permit Application" - This material is
a description of the local and regional geology, and includes
information on local rock types, soils, surface drainage
characteristics, and ground water. Most of the information contained
in this document has been extracted from the previously described
document and other reports. (4)
• "MRDC Ground Water Assessment, Phase I" - This document, prepared in
partial fulfillment of the facility's ground water quality assessment,
is a detailed analysis of the structural geology of the site. (5)
• "MRDC Ground Water Assessment, Phase II" - This document contains a
hydraulic analysis of the site derived from on-site pump test data.
(6)
• "MRDC Ground Water Assessment, Phase III" - This document discusses
the results of a surface resistivity study conducted for the purpose
of mapping the contaminant plume. (7)
The following general description of the site geology and hydrogeology is
derived from these documents.
Geology
General
The MRDC plant is located in the Southern Piedmont physiographic
province, which is characterized by gently rolling topography with fairly
steep interstream divides. Relief ranges from flat to fairly steep in the
immediate vicinity of the plant.
The geology of the area is typical of the Charlotte Belt, a belt of
southwestward trending metavolcanic rocks comprised predominantly of
granites, diorites, and volcanic slates. Diorite and syenite are the
predominant rock types found on-site, although a gabbro-diorite has been
- 14 -
-------
mapped along Highway 49 at the facility' s northwest boundary. The syenite is
present in the form of a ring-dike, approximately one-mile thick and 22 miles
in circumference, and is a dominant feature in the area, outcropping in Rocky
River, southeast of the plant.
Surface and near- surf ace soils consist of fine-grained silts and clays
with sand lenses deposited by Rocky River. These soils overlie a layer of
regolith of varying thickness consisting predominantly of an unconsolidated
or semi -consolidated mixture of clay and fragmental rock material ranging in
size from silt to boulders. The regolith is generally thicker in the areas
of higher elevation and may be near absent in the vicinity of the river.
Structural Geology
Over 100 outcrops were mapped within a five -mile radius of the facility.
Lithology, joint strike and dip, and foliation were determined at each
outcrop. The dominant joint patterns mapped are NO" - 10°E, N60° - 70°W,
N60° -70CE, and N70" - 80°E. These strikes are observed in all rock types
present in the area, however, each rock type appears to have some degree of
preferred joint orientation. These joint patterns are typical of regional
fracture patterns in the southeast Appalachians.
Most fractures and joints are nearly vertical, although some horizontal
jointing was observed, resulting in rectangular blocks of competent rock
separated by vertical and horizontal joints. Some joint fracturing has been
observed in deep well drilling and testing at depths as great as 800 feet.
(5)
Hydrofteologv
*.
Ground water occurrence beneath the facility conforms to the model
presented for typical Piedmont geological/hydrogeological systems. These
systems are characterized by a layer of soil and weathered rock (residuum or
regolith) overlying generally unweathered bedrock. The bedrock may or may
not contain networks of fractures. The fractures, if present, generally
decrease with depth.
Drilling data for wells installed at MRDC indicate that the soil/
residuura/regolith layer extends to depths approaching 60 to 80 feet,
particularly in areas of higher elevation. Along Rocky River, the thickness
of this layer decreases greatly, and it may even be absent except for a thin
layer of alluvial floodplain deposits.
Water levels obtained by facility personnel for monitoring wells across
the site indicate that water levels generally range from 10 to 20 feet below
ground level at areas of higher elevation and range for 5 to 10 feet below
ground level in lower elevations near the river. Figure 3 shows the ground
water contours for the ground water system beneath the facility when process
water supply wells are not pumping. This map indicates that the water table
is a subdued replica of the topography, as would be expected in this kind of
ground water system. Figure 4, however, shows ground water contours for the
water table when the system is under the influence of a heavily pumping
well. Under the steady- state conditions indicated in Figure 3, it appears
- 15 -
-------
that all discharge of ground water moving through the active plant area
occurs within the confines of the facility property boundary. (6)
Ground water in the soil/residuum/regolith layer is undoubtedly
interconnected with ground water in the fractured bedrock system. However,
because the permeability of the residuum is generally much less than the
fracture permeability of the bedrock, the residuum acts much like a leaky
confining layer above the fractured bedrock. If head in the fractured
bedrock is reduced, the residuum responds by slowly leaking ground water to
fractures along the interface between the two systems. (6)(7)
Area of Inadequacy in Characterization
Although the Task Force generally agrees with the above descriptions of
the site geology and hydrogeology, there is one important area of the
facility's characterization which is presented without substantiation.
Although the facility has identified a contaminant plume associated with the
impoundments, they contend that the pollutants in the regolith/bedrock
aquifer system discharge directly to the Rocky River and that no underflow in
the fractured rock zone occurs (2)(5)(6)(7) . They postulate that Rocky River
captures, via ground water discharge, all ground water flowing through the
active portions of the facility. This is totally presumptive and is based
solely on general hydrogeologic principles with no supporting scientific
data.
The Task Force recommends that the facility, through a rigorous testing
procedure, demonstrate ground water flow patterns and discharge charac-
teristics adjacent to and along the affected length of Rocky River. Ideally,
several clusters of monitoring wells, designed to function as piezometers,
should be located north and south of Rocky River. These wells would provide
the necessary vertical head distribution and chemical data needed to evaluate
the question of underflow. If access to the property south of the river is
not possible, the facility should propose other methods, including, but not
limited to, dye injection studies, to confirm or repudiate their contention
of "no underflow" conditions.
- 16 -
-------
INTERIM STATUS GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
MRDC has operated under several ground water sampling and analysis plans
(SAP's) since their ground water monitoring program was implemented in
November 1981. A CME conducted by Region IV ESD in February 1984 revealed
inadequacies with the SAP that was being used by MRDC at that time. These
inadequacies were described in the CME report and were subsequently
corrected. A review of the file information provided by PRC and MRDC
revealed that several SAP's have been proposed since the initial SAP was
revised.
Three subsequent SAP's were identified in the PRC material, as well as
material made available by MRDC during the Task Force site visit. One of
these, developed as part of the Phase IV assessment effort in March 1986, and
described as an interim detection monitoring and analyses plan, contains
specific sampling methods no longer used by MRDC. Another of the three is
identified as a compliance monitoring program and also identifies procedures
(bailing) no longer used by MRDC.
The third SAP is contained in MRDC' s RCRA Post-Closure Part B permit
application (dated October 1985) and appears to most closely reflect the
procedures currently used by MRDC. There are several instances, described
below, where adequate procedures are included in the other plans, but are not
included in the Part B SAP. To the extent possible, given the confusion
arising from these circumstances, the sampling and analytical procedures
currently used by MRDC were reviewed. This review revealed several
inadequacies, as well as discrepancies regarding what is specified in the
plan(s) and what actually occurs in the field. These are described below:
1. The Part B SAP indicates that at least two volumes of water are to be
removed from the wells prior to sampling. The compliance monitoring
plan specifies three volumes and the interim SAP closely reflects the
Part B SAP. The Task Force recommends that at least three volumes be
removed from wells that recover adequately during purging. If the
facility sampling personnel conduct in situ field measurements for pH,
specific conductance, and temperature, as specified in the plan, and
these measurements indicate that these parameters have stabilized for
three measurements, the two volumes are probably adequate, however.
2. Based on field notes acquired during the evaluation, MRDC sampling
personnel do not appear to be conducting the in situ field measure-
ments, as indicated in all three SAP's. Temperature is usually
measured, but apparently only at the end of purging;'pH is rarely
measured, and specific conductance is never measured. The Task Force
strongly recommends that MRDC sampling personnel begin immediately
conducting in situ measurements during purging and record all
measurements in field notes. pH measurements must be conducted at the
wellhead within 15 minutes after the sample is collected.
3. The purging procedures generally apply only to the dedicated pump
systems in the six RCRA monitoring wells. The deep wells installed as
part of the assessment should also be considered RCRA wells and should
be covered by this document(s). Accordingly, the document should be
- 17 -
-------
modified to describe purging with deep submersible pumps. The
modification should include references to generator placement, pump
placement, and pump decontamination procedures.
4. The Part B SAP does not contain a description of sample bottles for
the required parameters and special handling instructions. These were
included in the other SAP's. MRDC must reference and use sample
containers specified in current agency guidance and this report and
include these in the SAP.
5. The Part B and interim SAP' s indicate that samples that normally
require chemical preservation will only be preserved if they cannot be
"immediately" analyzed. All samples that require chemical preser-
vation must be preserved at the time of collection and placed on ice.
There is no guarantee that the sample will be analyzed immediately
upon delivery to the laboratory. Preservation maintains the validity
of the sample if problems arise and the laboratory cannot immediately
analyze the sample. The Task Force strongly recommends that MRDC
immediately implement conceal preservation procedures for all
' appropriate samples.
6. The Task Force recommends that MRDC develop a new field book for
recording pertinent field information. The current records are
incomplete and difficult to interpret.
7. MRDC must immediately rectify problems identified in the laboratory
evaluations. Recommendations No. 4 and No. 5 identify steps MRDC
should take to rectify problems identified both in the SAP and
laboratory reviews. The following items must be addressed in a timely
manner by MRDC to provide the quality of data required for their RCRA
ground water monitoring program:
• MRDC mast immediately begin calibrating their specific conductance
meter daily during ground water sampling events.
• MRDC must immediately begin digesting samples collected for total
recoverable metals analyses.
• MRDC must immediately begin using correct procedures, as specified
in their analytical methods and described in this report, for
analyzing samples for sulfate and nitrate.
• MRDC must immediately begin proper documentation of all standard
curves.
Analytical -methods and procedures were reviewed as a part of the
laboratory evaluation. The results of this evaluation are included in a
separate section of this report.
The Task Force recommends that MRDC unify all existing SAP's with
consideration to the above comments, and create a single working document.
- 18 -
-------
INTERIM STATUS GROUND WATER MONITORING - DETECTION
Because of the land-based hazardous waste management activity at the
site, described previously in the Waste Management Units/Waste Charac-
terization section, MRDC was required to implement a RCRA ground water
monitoring program at the facility. The requirements for the program are
found at 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart F, and became effective on November 19,
1981. Since its implementation, the ground water monitoring program at MRDC
has undergone a number of changes. This section describes the major aspects
of this program and the changes they have undergone.
Ground Water Monitoring System
In June 1981, NUS Corporation, after an earlier site reconnaissance by
one of their hydrogeologists, directed the installation of six ground water
monitoring wells at the MRDC facility. These wells comprised the original
RCRA interim status ground water monitoring system and consisted of one
upgradient monitoring well, well M-l, and five downgradient monitoring wells,
wells M-2 through M-6 (see Figure 2).
Well Construction
Each well was constructed with 4-inch diameter, Schedule 40, PVC casing,
and was screened with 5 1/2 feet of Number 10 (0.10 inch) PVC screen which
was plugged at the bottom. All joints were glued. Each well was packed for
a minimum of 2 feet above the screen with gravel or sand and gravel. A
cement plug was placed above the sand and gravel pack and followed with
back-filled cuttings to the surface. A cement collar was placed at the
surface to divert run-off. Following construction, each well was developed
by surging with potable water. A table with well construction specifics and
the NUS well construction and drilling records is included as Appendix D.
The EPA Technical Enforcement Guidance Document specifies a preference
for either stainless steel or Teflon as well construction materials. It also
indicates that alternate materials may also, on a case-by-case basis, be
acceptable. For example, when the waste constituents of interest are
inorganic compounds, PVC may be considered an acceptable material.
The waste historically placed in the surface impoundments were primarily
inorganic, i.e., metals compounds. This is substantiated by waste analysis
performed on sludge from the impoundments, as well as a review of the
facility and Task Force ground water monitoring data, as only a very few
organic compounds were detected; and these were detected at low
concentrations-(most at trace levels). The choice of PVC as a monitoring
well construction material in this situation would seem acceptable,
particularly for use in a detection monitoring system.
Several problems or areas for improvement with regard to well construc-
tion were observed during the Task Force evaluation. The concrete pads place
around each well at the surface were generally too small. The Task Force
recommends that the pads at each well be modified by increasing their size to
at least three feet square. They should be at least 6-inches thick to
minimize the chances of cracking.
- 19 -
-------
The use of native material backfill and glued joints is contradictory to
Agency and generally accepted industry standards for monitoring well
construction. A review of the Task Force ground water data appears to
indicate that there are no detectable effects from use of PVC glue observable
at this time, nearly six years since the wells were installed. Also, because
the downgradient wells, particularly along the river, are quite shallow, the
length of annular space requiring backfilling or grouting is generally
short. In this environment of frequent flooding and subsequent saturation of
all materials, the lack of a grouted annular space is not so critical as in
most monitoring situations. The Task Force does not think these two problems
necessarily render any data from these wells useless. We do, however,
strongly recommend that all future monitoring wells be constructed
appropriately, according to the aforementioned agency guidance.
Also, during the Task Force reconnaissance, performed prior to the
evaluation, river silt was observed inside the caps of the wells during a
round of water level measurements. This indicated that the river had
recently flooded and covered several of the wells, filling the casing with
river water. This would most likely result in the contained river water
moving out of the casing, through the screen, and into the sand pack and
'formation. The flood had occurred just prior to the evaluation, as evidenced
by a strandline created in hay spread over the recently closed impoundments.
rDuring the Task Force level survey of the ground water monitoring system the
strandline elevation was also surveyed. This information was immediately
made available to facility personnel, along with the suggestion that the
top-of-casing elevation of each of the flooded wells be raised to an
elevation above the observed or historically predictable flood level of Rocky
River.
Monitoring Well Location
The upgradient well is located approximately 700 feet northeast of the
(closed) hazardous waste management area. Based on the potentiometric map of
the steady-state ground water surface (Figure 3) and on historical facility
and Task Force ground water analytical data, the well is appropriately
located.
Based also on the steady-state potentiometric map (Figure 3), the
following downgradient relationships exist. Well M-2 is approximately 250
feet downgradient of impoundment No. 1. Well M-3 is approximately 75 feet
from the depicted edge of closed impoundments No. 2 and No. 3. Well M-4 is
.about 200 feet from closed impoundment No. 4 and wells M-5 and M-6 are 75-100
feet from impoundment No. 5. These wells are separated horizontally by
distances ranging from 300 to 500 feet. Wells M-3 through M-6 are located in
the narrow floodplain of Rocky River. The locations of these downgradient
wells, with respect to impoundments No. 2 through No. 5, falls short of the
immediate detection standard at 40 CFR Part 265.90.
Because impoundment No. 1 is located upgradient from the other
impoundments and has a unique waste history and characterization, it should
be monitored as a separate entity. Without the wells located close to the
impoundment, it is not possible to monitor the effectiveness of the closure
activities implemented at the facility or characterize the contamination
- 20 -
-------
between impoundment No. I?ait&*g1m- O4&& . -.'«•-"• «.?: ; i '.
recommends that MRDC install -sfcWifca.l *fe
impoundment No. 1 and the»-o£h«*m»p»*Si .
wells, P-2 and M-7, for thevfflH^tJs&'to* ... . r
this area. The Task Fore* SfeJWttiSisdst . COM-.
potentiometric map for thft v*i$^pri>8]£ ': :..„ .;* 3 'a?r- .. LV_>.-
Although the downgradtelpPWe^lS^i- this system deviate somewhat from the
recommendations, an empiriei^'- Review »cf the Task Force dat£ indicates that
all of the wells in quest*off3fawir each well, with respect to the
upgradient well. This deirta
-------
-------
INTERIM STATUS GROUND WATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT
Outline
According to the regulations, as found at 40 CFR Part 265.93(a),
facilities for which the ground water monitoring regulations were
applicable were, within one year of the effective date of the regulations
(by November 19, 1982) to develop a ground water quality assessment plan
outline. During a CME inspection conducted by Region IV ESD personnel in
February 1984, a very brief outline was on file at the facility.
During the Task Force evaluation, however, a different outline was
presented for review. This outline was certified by Mr. Alan Barry Nelson,
C.P.G., and dated September 12, 1982. Accompanying the outline was a
blueprint drawing dated March 1985. This four-phase plan outlined in the
document was identical to the plan that was implemented at about that time.
These circumstances raise questions regarding the practice of modifying
records without proper documentation.
Assessment Efforts
November 1982
The facility has, through a number of consultants, conducted several
ground water quality investigations since 1982. In a report dated November
1982, "Hydrogeologic Investigation, Mineral Research and Development
Corporation", Moore, Gardner, and Associates, Inc., recognize that releases
have occurred from the hazardous waste management units and identify the
pollutants present in the plume which is discharging to Rocky River. A part
of this investigation involved the placement of a shallow boring
approximately 150 feet northeast of well M-6, for obtaining ground water
analyses. It is not known whether this was simply a hole or was finished as
a well. Although the report states that analyses indicated "minimal levels
of contamination" at this location, the report summary indicates that the
location is clean and that the boundary of the contamination is much closer
to well M-6.
The pollutants identified in the report are barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, selenium, iron, zinc, manganese, sodium, chlorides and sulfates. All
of these compounds, except selenium, sodium, and sulfates exceeded the
applicable primary and secondary drinking water standards. This report is
also the first occurrence of the unsubstantiated statements regarding the
effectiveness of the hydrogeologic boundary formed by Rocky River.
January 1985 through Present
Little was done after the November 1982 ground water quality investi-
gations until 1985, when a detailed assessment was conducted and presented.
This assessment, triggered by the statistical comparisons required by 40 CFR
Part 265.93, was conducted in several phases, each devoted to a different
aspect of the characterization and assessment of the site. At the time of
the Task Force evaluation, the assessment consisted of four phases, Phase I -
Structural Analysis and Ground Water Use Survey; Phase II - Hydraulic
Analysis (Pump Test); Phase III - Geophysical Survey and Pollutant Plume
- 22 -
-------
-------
Mapping; and Phase IV - Water Quality Investigation. The results of each
phase are summarized below. (5)(6)(7)(8)
Phase I - Major joint traces were identified and characterized. They
trend in north-south, northeast-southwest, and northwest-southeast
directions, and apparently are primarily vertically oriented. Based on the
presence of the river as a hydrogeologic discharge boundary and the vertical
nature of the joints and fractures, the Phase I report speculates that
underflow across the boundary, i.e., under the river, is unlikely.
The ground water use survey revealed two domestic wells near the
facility. One of these is upgradient of the facility and the other is
approximately 2,000 feet east of the facility. The results of previous
assessment efforts, as well as other phases of this assessment, indicate that
the probability of the facility affecting these wells is low or nonexistent.
Phase II - Phase II was a ground water hydraulic analysis of the site
based on a 24 hour pump test involving several deep process supply wells and
monitoring wells. One of the main conclusions of the study was that there
was a high degree of anisotropy in the fractured bedrock portion of the
ground water system. The report indicates that the fracture system trending
in the northeast-southwest direction is highly transmissive. This contention
is based on the rapid response of the process wells along this axis after
pumping was initiated in well P-3. The anisotropy attributed to the
perpendicular axis was ascertained using drawdown data from monitoring well
M-2, purportedly screened partially in bedrock.
Several independent observations were made by the Task Force after review
of this and other documents. The well log prepared for this well indicates
that the well is screened in light clayey loam above the soil/bedrock
interface and not in bedrock, as the report says. As such, the slow response
time for the drawdown observed in well M-2 could be caused by the slow
draining of the low permeability loam, and not the lack of a developed
fracture system at this orientation.
The available evidence indicates that well M-2 is probably hydraulically
connected with the fracture system aligned with the process wells. Surface
impoundment No. 1 lies on or near the trace of the suspected fracture system
and has been shown, through analyses of sludge contained in the impoundment,
to contain arsenic at hazardous concentrations (prior to clean-up
activities). Well M-2 was the only well along the western boundary of the
site for which arsenic was identified, which would seem to indicate that the
fracture is a major avenue of ground water movement from the center of the
site toward Rocky River.
Other areas covered by the Phase II report which are of particular
interest, in terms of the requirements of an assessment, are the
potentiometric maps and calculations of ground water flow rate. Figures 3
and 4 depict the potentiometric surface under steady-state and pumping
conditions. As the report states, all pollutants entering the ground water
system under the active portions of the facility would be transported with
the ground water and discharged to Rocky River within the facility
boundaries. There would be no migration to off-site ground water receptors.
The report also reports average ground water flow rates as 0.017 ft/day for
the regolith. No values are given for ground water flow rates in bedrock.
- 23 -
-------
Phase III - A resistivity survey was conducted using a Wenner array with
a depth of resolution of approximately 30 feet. This corresponds to the
average depth to bedrock throughout much of the area of investigation.
Figures 5 and 6 are maps of the actual resistivity values contoured by the
consultant and the plume map, respectively, constructed using this
information. (7)
It is interesting to note that the plume does not encompass well M-6A,
even though Task Force data show empirically that the samples collected from
this well have elevated levels of cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, and
lead. The sample collected and analyzed for total metals content also
contained arsenic, identified as a waste constituent in impoundment No. 1.
It appears, based on the resistivity value map that the arsenic could
originate at the impoundment, move to the northeast under the influence of
pumping of process well P-3, and eventually be released from this influence
to ground water flow through the deep, fractured bedrock. The resistivity
value map indicates a lobe of low resistivity leaving the area of well P-3
heading in a south-southeast direction. It appears to be moving under some
form of structural control, whether it be the bedrock highs immediately to
the east, an active ground water discharge pattern in a fracture system, or a
combination of both. Ground water from this portion of the aquifer, either
fully or partially discharging to the river, would pass through the screened
portion of well W-6A, the deep well at the river, thereby transmitting the
arsenic from the impoundment to the well. The implication is that there may
be several significant axes of flow through fractured bedrock at the facility
rather than one, and further, contaminants may be present at great enough
depths in the bedrock system to validate concerns raised about the ability of
the river to totally capture all ground water flow from the site.
If the deeper portions of the bedrock aquifer adjacent to and beneath
Rocky River are contaminated, the issue of whether or not Rocky River totally
captures all ground water discharge is crucial. At the time of the Task
Force evaluation, facility representatives disclosed that a residential
development of approximately 100 homesites, was planned for the area
immediately south of the facility across Rocky River. Each homesite in this
development would depend on a well to supply water for the residents. The
problem posed here is two-fold. Has there been any underflow of the plume
across Rocky River into this area? Further, if there has not, will pumping
of the planned residential water supply wells provide the hydraulic impetus
to create underflow?
The additional required studies, briefly described in the hydrogeological
characterization review, should provide the answers to these questions.
Phase IV - This report is primarily a review of existing ground water
quality data based on analyses of samples collected from the existing RCRA
monitoring wells and the on-site process water supply wells. The report
concludes that arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, iron, selenium,
zinc, chloride, nitrate, sodium, and sulfate are pollutants in plumes
identified based on samples collected from the facility wells.
- 24 -
-------
Inadequacy of Ground Water Quality Assessment
The standards for a ground water quality assessment are found at 40 CFR
Part 265.93 (a) and are three-fold. The owner/operator of a facility which
has been shown to have a release must determine:
• Whether hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents have entered
the ground water;
• The rate and extent of migration of hazardous waste or hazardous waste
constituents in the ground water, and
• The concentrations of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents
in the ground water.
With respect to these standards, the previously described assessment
reports have:
• Determined that hazardous waste constituents are present in ground
water;
• Determined the rate of movement of the plume in the regolith; and
• Using all existing process and monitoring wells, identified the
concentrations of hazardous constituents in the ground water.
MRDC has failed to adequately define the extent of the plume, both
horizontally and vertically. At the time of the evaluation, the process well
and two ground water monitoring wells were the only wells providing data on
which vertical extent determinations could be made. Of these, all but well
M-6A are located near the center of the facility, resulting in only one
vertically probing well along the downgradient extent of the area of known
contamination. Well M-6A has not even provided data necessary to identify
the lower reaches of the plume.
The resistivity map and subsequent plume map included in the Phase III
report form the basis for MRDC' s horizontal extent determination. Failure to
include wells M-6 and M-6A in the plume map indicates a basic inadequacy of
this attempt. MRDC must, as an initial effort, install additional well pairs
to determine the extent of contamination. The plume map included in the
Phase III report should be used as a tool in locating these clusters. The
ultimate output of this investigation should be maps and profiles of the
plume which indicate, with a high degree of confidence, the horizontal and
vertical extents of the plume. Ground water analyses from the additional
wells would also provide a more accurate characterization of the hazardous
constituents in the plume.
- 25 -
-------
LABORATORY EVALUATION
The on-site and off-site laboratory facilities that conduct the analy-
tical analyses for the Subpart F Ground-Water Monitoring samples for Mineral
Research & Development Corporation (MRDC) were evaluated on February 11, 1988.
The laboratories were evaluated fqr their ability to produce quality data for
those parameters required by Part;265.92 and developed under Part 265.93
requirements. See Table 3 for a listing of parameters evaluated during the
audit. The off-site laboratory, Environmental Testing, Inc. (ETI), Charlotte,
North Carolina, subcontracts total organic halide (TOX) analysis out to
General Engineering Laboratories, :Charleston, South Carolina, or Environment
1, Greenville, South Carolina. These laboratories in South Carolina have
been certified by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environment and
were not visited.
Analytical equipment, sample handling, preservation techniques, methods
and quality assurance procedures were examined for adequacy. Laboratory
records were reviewed for completeness, accuracy and compliance with State and
Federal requirements.
Sampling. Preservation. Holding Tfenes and Chain-of-Custody
Sample containers, preservatives, and holding times were consistent with
EPA requirements, except for the pH, fecal coliform, phenol and total organic
carbon (TOG) analyses. Samples collected for pH analysis were usually
analyzed within thirty minutes to -two hours after collection. The samples
for fecal coliform analyses were collected in a non-sterile container and
poured into a sterilized container. These samples were shipped to ETI, and
one set did not meet the 6-hour holding time requirement. Phenol samples
were collected in plastic, iced down and shipped to ETI. TOG samples were
generally analyzed within 24 hours of collection but were not preserved at
collection by MRC.
Regulatory Requirement: Samples for pH analyses must be analyzed
immediately (within 15 minutes). See Table II-l, Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste - Physical/Chemical Methods. SW-846 (3rd
Edition,1986).
Regulatory Requirement: Bacteriological samples must be collected directly
into a sterilized container. See Method 906A, Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater. 16th Edition, 1985.
Regulatory Requirement: Phenol samples must be collected in glass and
preserved with sulfuric acid to a pH less than (<)2 if the samples cannot
be analyzed immediately. See Table II-l, SW-846.
Regulatory Requirement: If T£)C samples cannot be analyzed immediately,
preservation by lowering the sample to a pH <2 is required. The inorganic
carbon constituents are normally removed by lowering the sample pH,
followed by purging with an inert gas, prior to measuring the TOG. This
technique, used for total organic carbon (TOG) samples preserved with
H2SOA, would cause volatile organics to be stripped from the sample during
the sample preparation step tp remove inorganic carbon (C02) prior to
measurement of the organic carbon. The method detection limit for TOG
-26-
-------
(approximately 1 mg/L) is at least one to two orders of magnitude above the
concentration of the volatile organic-components of the TOC. However, these
volatiles should be detected in the VGA analysis. Therefore, the emphasis
on organic contamination should be placed on the VGA results instead of the
TOC data. See Table 11-1, SW-846.
Chain-of-custody procedures used by MHDC and ETI were adequate and well
documented.
Laboratory Sample Analysis
The laboratory method used by MRDC for specific conductance was an approved
method. However, the specific conductance meter was not calibrated daily
against a standard of known value.
Regulatory Requirement: The cell constant must be determined prior to
measuring the sample conductance, and the specific conductance meter/electrode
system must be calibrated daily against a fresh standard that is near the
expected sample conductance. See Method 9050, SW-846; Method 205, Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastes (Standard Methods), 16th
Edition (1985); or Method 120.1, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Wastes and
Wastewater (EPA Methods), EPA-600/4-79-020, and all current revisions.
Samples for total metals were not digested prior to being analyzed. The
majority of the samples were low in suspended solids and turbidity, and the
TOC values were less than 10 mg/L. The data reported could be biased on the
low side and would represent something less than total recoverable metals.
Regulatory Requirement: Samples for total recoverable metals must be
digested. See Method 3005 or Method 3010, SW-846.
o
Approved methods were used for the sulfate (SO^ ) and nitrate (NO-j-N)
procedures. However, when the sample absorbance values were higher than the
highest standard analyzed, the sample was not diluted and reanalyzed. This
would cause a negative bias.
Regulatory Requirement: When the absorbance reading for the sample is
greater than the absorbance reading for the highest standard, the sample
must be diluted and reanalyzed. Use a sample aliquot containing not more
than 40 mg/L of SO^"2 when using Method 9038, and 2 mg/L NO-j-N when using
Method 9200. See SW-846.
Quality Assurance and Data Documentation
The MRDC laboratory was in the process of establishing a formal quality
assurance (QA) program that consists of a QA plan, standard operating
procedures (SOP) and includes the use of duplicates, spikes, and reference
standards to verify the quality of data for each parameter analyzed.
Instrument calibration and maintenance records were maintained, and
temperatures of regulated devices were checked and documented. Most of the
raw data, quality control records and calculations were documented and
maintained on file as required. Some standard curves were not adequately
labeled and dated.
-27-
-------
Regulatory Requirement: Records for monitoring information shall include:
(1) The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
(2) The date(s) analyses were performed;
(3) The analytical techniques or methods used; and
(4) the results of such analyses.
See Code of Federal Regulations Part 270.30(j)(3).
The ETI had established a formal quality assurance plan (QA) plan that
consists of a QA plan, standard operating procedures and includes the use of
duplicates, spikes, and reference standards to verify the quality of data
for each parameter analyzed. Instrument calibration and maintenance records
were maintained, and temperatures of regulated devices were checked and
documented. All raw data, quality control records and calculations were
documented and maintained-on file as required.
Summary
Based on the overall findings, the MRDC laboratories have the capability to
provide acceptable quality data for the ground-water monitoring program.
The deficiencies noted for pH, phenol, and TOG (holding time and
preservation) could cause the results to be questionable. The sample
container and holding time deficiencies noted for fecal coliforms would
cause the data to be questionable. The deficiency noted for specific
conductance could cause the data to be questionable. Most of the nitrate
and sulfate data were acceptable. A limited number of values reported for
these parameters would be biased on the low side. Total metals data would
be reported as something less than "total" metals in some instances.
-28-
-------
TASK FORCE ANALYTICAL DATA EVALUATION
Samples of ground water were collected from eight monitoring wells,
including the six designated RCRA wells and two additional monitoring wells
installed during the ground water quality assessment. All samples were
analyzed for the constituents and parameters listed in Appendix B. The
analytical data summary tables for all analyses, including data from samples
split with Region IV ESD, are included as Tables 4, 5, and 6. These data are
discussed in detail in this section. The complete data are included as
Appendix E. Some analyses reported in these tables are estimated values and
are indicated by the letter "J". Results for several compounds are reported
as unusable, based on evaluation of quality control for those samples, and
are reported with the letter "R". Several compounds were reported because
there was sufficient presumptive evidence of their presence.
Metals - Task Force
Total versus Dissolved Values
Samples were collected for both total and dissolved metals analyses.
Although the concentrations reported for both types of analyses generally did
not vary considerably, there were patterns in the data for individual metals
regarding total versus dissolved concentrations.
With very few exceptions, the results of analyses for total concen-
trations for silver, arsenic, cadmium, vanadium, and iron exceeded the
dissolved metals values. Similarly, the results for dissolved concentrations
of barium, cobalt, chromium, nickel, lead, calcium, magnesium, and sodium
exceed the total values. There was no pattern observed for zinc, aluminum,
and manganese.
Silver
Silver was detected only in the sample collected at well No. 3 and
analyzed for total metals. A concentration of 6 ug/1 was reported.
Arsenic
Arsenic was detected in three samples, collected at well No. 2 (total and
dissolved) and well No. 6A (total). All values reported were 8 ug/1.
Barium
Barium was detected in samples collected at all wells sampled, and was
generally present at the greatest concentration in the samples collected for
dissolved metals analyses. The highest concentrations were detected in
samples collected at wells No. 3, No. 5, No. 6, No. 6A, and No. 7. The
respective values reported for these samples are 2,000 ug/1, 520 ug/1, 320
ug/1, 990 ug/1, and 270 ug/1.
Beryllium
Beryllium was detected in samples collected at wells No. 2, No. 5, No. 6,
and No. 6A. None of the concentrations reported exceeded 6 ug/1.
- 29 -
-------
Cadmium
Cadmium was detected in samples collected from four wells, No. 3, No. 4,
No. 5, and No. 6A. Concentrations detected in the samples from all wells,
except No. 3, were all less than 25 ug/1. The sample from well No. 3,
however, contained 350 ug/1.
Cobalt
Cobalt was detected in samples collected from wells No. 3, No. 4, and No.
6. Maximum concentrations detected in the samples from wells No. 4 and No. 6
were 80 ug/1 and 81 ug/1, respectively. The sample from well No. 3 contained
170 ug/1 dissolved cobalt. ,
Chromium
Chromium was detected in all wells sampled, except for well No. 7. The
sample from well No. 2 contained the highest concentrations, 230 ug/1 and 260
ug/1, total and dissolved, respectively. None of the concentrations measured
in the other samples exceeded 27 ug/1, and were detected in the samples
collected for dissolved analyses.
Copper
Copper was detected in all wells sampled, except for well No. 7. None of
the concentrations reported exceeded 25 ug/1.
Nickel
Nickel was detected in samples collected from wells No. 3, No. 4, No. 6A,
and No. 7. It was present only in the dissolved metals samples collected
from wells No. 4, No. 6A, and No. 7, and did not exceed a concentration of 63
ug/1 in these samples. The concentrations reported for the sample collected
at well No. 3, however, were significantly higher, with nickel detected at
concentrations of 220 ug/1 and 280 ug/1 for the total and dissolved samples,
respectively.
Lead
Lead was detected in samples collected at wells No. 3, No. 6A, and No 7.
The samples collected for dissolved me tails at wells No. 3 and No. 6A both
contained 220 ug/1. The samples collected for total and dissolved metal
analyses at well No. 7 contained 74 ug/1 and 59 ug/1, respectively.
Vanadium
Vanadium was detected only in the samples collected for total metals
analyses from wells No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6 and No. 6A. Concentrations
ranged from 17 ug/1, in the sample collected at well No. 6, to 30 ug/1, in
the sample collected at well No. 3.
- 30 -
-------
Zinc
Zinc was detected in samples-collected at all wells, except for the
samples collected at well No. 1. The samples collected at wells No. 3,
No. 4, and No. 5 contained appreciably higher concentrations than detected in
the remaining wells. The samples collected at well No. 3 contained the
highest concentrations, 270,000 ug/1 and 25,000 ug/1, total and dissolved
zinc, respectively. The samples from well No. 4 contained the next highest
concentrations, 13,000 ug/1 and 16,000 ug/1, total and dissolved zinc,
respectively. The concentrations reported for the other wells did not exceed
110 ug/1.
Aluminum /
Aluminum was detected in samples collected from wells No. 1, No. 3,
No. 4, No. 6, and No. 6A. The highest concentration, 5,200 ug/1, was
reported for the sample collected at well No. 3. The next highest
concentration, 3,700 ug/1, was reported for the sample collected at well No.
1. The concentrations detected in the remaining samples ranged from 81 ug/1,
from the sample collected at well No. 6, to 147 ug/1, for the sample
collected at well No. 5.
Manganese
Manganese was detected in samples collected from all monitoring wells
sampled during the investigation. The concentrations detected in the samples
collected from wells No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6, and No. 6A ranged from 2,800
ug/1 to 43,000 ug/1, at wells No. 6A and No. 3, respectively. Concentration
of 310 ug/1 and 340 ug/1 were reported for the total and dissolved samples,
respectively, collected at well No. 7. Concentrations detected in samples
from well No. 1 and No. 2, were all below 100 ug/1.
Calcium
Calcium was detected in every sample collected during the evaluation.
The concentrations detected in the samples collected from wells No. 1 and No.
2, which ranged from 16 mg/1 total calcium for the sample collected from well
No. 1 to 48 mg/1 dissolved calcium for the sample collected from well No. 2,
were generally an order of magnitude less than the concentrations reported
for samples collected at the other wells. Concentrations detected in samples
from these wells ranged from 240 mg/1, in the sample collected from well
No. 7, to 2,400 mg/1, in the sample collected from well No. 6A.
Magnesium
Magnesium was detected in every sample collected during the evaluation and
follows the same general pattern of appearance as calcium. The lowest concen-
trations were detected in samples collected from wells No. 1 and No. 2. The
concentrations reported for these wells, which ranged from 11 mg/1, for the
sample collected from well No. 1, to 23 mg/1 for the sample collected from
well No. 2, are an order of magnitude less than the concentrations reported
for the other samples. The highest concentrations, ranging from 300 mg/1 to
350 mg/1, were detected in samples collected from wells No. 5 and No. 6A.
- 31 -
-------
Iron
Iron was detected in samples collected from all wells. The concen-
trations detected in these samples ranged from 0.02 mg/1, in the sample from
well No. 6, to 5.2 mg/1, in the sample collected from well No. 3.
Sodium
Sodium was detected in samples collected from all wells. The
concentrations detected ranged from a low concentration of 7.9 mg/1 total
sodium, in the sample from well No. 1, to a high concentration of 340 mg/1
dissolved sodium, in the sample collected from well No. 6A.
Potassium
Potassium was detected in samples collected from all wells. The
concentrations reported ranged from a low concentration of 1.2 mg/1 total
potassium, in the sample from well No. 1, to a high concentration of 12 mg/1
dissolved potassium, in the sample collected from well No. 6A.
Metals - Split Comparison
The spilt sample results for metals analysis indicates a generally good
agreement between the Task Force contract laboratory and Region IV ESD
laboratory. The apparent differences in results reported for beryllium,
cadmium, and copper can easily be attributed to the Region IV MQL' s (minimum
quantification limits) for these metals, which range from 10 ug/1 to 20 ug/1.
These MQL' s generally represent concentrations higher than the Task Force
results for these metals. The only other significant difference is the
disparity in the aluminum values. The only Task Force sample split with
Region IV in which aluminum was detected, contained 147 ug/1. The Region IV
analyses indicate a concentration of 2,400 ug/1 for this sample. No aluminum
was reported by the contract laboratory for the remaining split samples, but
Region IV analyses indicate concentrations ranging from 1,400 ug/1 to 5,200
ug/1.
General Inorganic Parameters
Chloride
Chloride concentrations were detected in all samples collected and ranged
from low concentrations of 5.0 mg/1 and 53 mg/1, detected in samples from
well No. 1 and No. 2, respectively, to a high concentration of 2,800 mg/1,
detected in the sample collected from well No. 6A. The results for all
downgradient wells, from well No. 3 to wells No. 6 and 6A, indicate that
chloride is elevated in these wells, as compared to other wells in the
system.
Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen
Nitrate-nitrite nitrogen concentrations were detected in all samples
collected and ranged from lows of 1.4 mg/1, detected in the sample from well
No. 1, and 24 mg/1, detected in the sample from well No. 2, to a high
- 32 -
-------
concentration of 1,600 mg/1, in the sample collectedrTfrtHn. Tie
is basically the same pattern indicated by the ehl6r4.de> anal
Sulfate
Sulfate concentrations were detected in samples^'BefilectEd «.. ell vol.
and ranged from a low concentration of 6.6 mg/1:, -iiscstheSsaiapi.: ijolleccecl trom
well No. 1 to a high concentration of 130 mg/1,i*dstofetsted^ltt samples collet:ed
from wells No. 3 and No. 5.
General Organic Parameters
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic carbon concentrations were deteeSed oni£ in *-h«» Region IV
splits, and ranged from a value of 2.9 mg/1, in? Cfe* sample c - •_• : froir.
well No. 7, to a value of 3.9 mg/1, in the sampte-:cbllec£*d _icr veil .NO. 5,
}
Total Organic Halogen
Only one sample, collected from well No. 6,c contained ai - L > •• , .
total organic halogen (TOX) . A value of 150 Uj^l 30X was esi.iT.-j;. c for this
sample.
Purgeable Organic Halogen
Only one sample, collected from well No. 6, contained
purgeable organic halogen (POX). A value of 82 ug/1 POX va
this sample.
Selected Chlorinated Compounds
Heptachlor epoxide was the only compound i* this catego d-y <*-•."
concentration of 0.032 ug/1 was reported by th« Region IV L. 'i:- - tv
split sample collected at well No. 5.
Extractable Organic Compounds
Three extractable organic compounds were dst*oted in two ^••"' •••
collected during the evaluation. 1,2,4- trichla«to*nzene';»a. c-ir. .j .
concentration of 77 ug/1 in the sample collected ironr. we'll i . -•.
Ethylmethyldioxane and trimethyltriazinetrioneiw«riec:bdth-pr. n----i \ b
present in the Region IV split sample collecteff-Stsw'weti No. :•• at e.stiaated
concentrations of 2 ug/1 and 4 ug/1, respectiv&ly
Purgeable Organic Compounds
Three purgeable organic compounds were detect* itr-sample.3 from two
wells. Chloroform was detected and reported by eh&--'-Tasfc>Force contract
laboratory and the Region IV ESD laboratory ini the-Sample! collected at well
No. 5. The concentrations reported were an estimated .2 ug/1 and 2.1 mg/1,
respectively. Tetrachloroethene(tetrachloroethylene-)- was :dotected at a
concentration of 25 ug/1 in the sample collected - at "we'll> No. ( . Tur?l xylcne.
- 33 -
-------
estimated to be present at a concentration of 1 ug/1, was detected in the
sample collected from well No. 6.
Data Review Summary
An empirical review of the data reveals several facts. The results for
well No. 2 indicate that this well has a unique pattern of contamination. It
is one of only two wells containing arsenic; it contains an order of
magnitude higher concentration of chromium than any other well, and moderate
concentrations of zinc. As described earlier in the report, these data could
be indicative of structural control and historical process well pumping
controlling movement of a plume, primarily from the area of impoundment
No. 1, westward towards Rocky River.
These results also indicate that the area from well No. 3 across to well
No. 6 (including well No. 6A) has been contaminated, presumably from leakage
from the impoundments. The primary chemical evidence for this conclusion is
elevated metals (beryllium, cadmium, cobalt, nickel, lead, zinc, manganese,
calcium, magnesium, and sodium) and elevated chloride, nitrate-nitrite
nitrogen, and sulfate in wells in this area.
Samples from the two wells installed into the fractured bedrock portion
of the ground water system indicate that contamination from the impoundments
has migrated through the saturated regolith into the fractured bedrock and is
moving through these fractures to Rocky River.
Organic compounds were detected in only two of the wells sampled. The
compounds are generally multi-use compounds and could be solvents, insecti-
cides, and/or heat transfer liquids. Based on the low concentrations
reported, no origin can be attributed to these compounds. The Task Force
recommends that Region IV or the State resample this well to better
characterize the organics that were detected during the Task Force sampling.
- 34 -
-------
REFERENCES
1. Henke, M.D. and Pizzi, F.P., 1985, Environmental Risk Assessment of
Mineral Research and Development Corporation. Pilko and Associates, Inc.
for AIG Consultants, Inc.
2. Nelson, A.B., Ravenel, S.F., Wafers, F.D., league, D.A., 1982, Report of
Hydrogeological Investigation, Mineral Research and Development
Corporation. Concord. North Carolina. Moore, Gardner, and Associates,
Inc., Asheboro, North Carolina. /
3. Brown, H.S., 1986, Geologic Setting of the Mineral Research and
Development Corp. Plant Site. Harrisburg. N.C.. Geological Resources,
Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
\
4. 1985, Mineral Research and Development. Harrisburg. North Carolina. RCRA
Post Closure Permit Application, prepared by Black and Veatch, Consulting
Engineers, Asheboro, North Carolina.
5. Jacob, K.M. and Nelson, A.B., 1985, Ground Water Assessment. Phase I.
Structural Analysis and Ground Water Use Survey, prepared by Black and
Veatch, Inc., Asheboro, North Carolina.
6. Jacob, K.M. and Nelson, A.B., 19.85, Mineral Research and Development.
Ground Water Assessment. Phase II. Ground Water Hydraulic Analysis.
7. 1985, Mineral Research and Development. Ground Water Assessment. Phase
III. Geophysical Survey and Pollutant Plume Mapping.
8. Jacob, K.M. and Nelson, A.B., 1986, Mineral Research and Development.
Ground Water Assessment. Phase IV. Water Quality Investigation. Black and
Veatch, Inc., and Engineering Tectonics.
- 35 -
-------
-------
FIGURES
-------
-------
MINERAL RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Figure 1
Facility Location Map
Mineral Research and Development Corporation
Harrisburg, North Carolina
-------
NOTE: Locations of Monitor
Wells are approximate
only.
—Not To Scale—
FIGURE 2
FACILITY DIAGRAM
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
-------
Figure 3
Potentiometric Surface Map
Surficial Aquifer (Regolith), Process Wells Off
Mineral Research and Development Corporation
Harrisburg, North Carolina
-------
Figure 4
Potentiometrlc Surface Map
Surficial Aquifer (Regolith), Process Well On
Mineral Research and Development Corporation
Harrisburg, North Carolina
-------
Figure 5
Resistivity Survey Map
Mineral Research and Development Corporation
Harrisburg, North Carolina
-------
Figure 6
Plume Boundary Map
(As Attributed to MRDC)
Mineral Research and Development Corporation
Harrisburg, North Carolina
-------
.TABLES
-------
-------
TABLE 1 .
SAMPLING INFORMATION SUMMARY
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORP.
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
MARCH 1987
Station
Well M-l
Date
Sampled
3/16
Well M-2
Well M-3
Well M-5
Well M-6
Well M-6A
Well M-7
3/17
3/16
Well M-4 3/17-3/18
3/17
3-17
3/18
3/18
Description/Location
Upgradient well, near bend in road at
eastern edge of site
Downgradient well, west of
impoundment No. 1
Downgradient well, at river south of
closed impoundment No. 2
Downgradient well, at river west of
impoundment No. 5
Downgradient well, at river south of
west end of Impoundment No. 5
Downgradient well, at river south of
east end of impoundment No. 5
Downgradient well, at river south of
east end of impoundment No. 5
Bedrock well between impoundment
No. 1 and closed impoundments No. 2
and No. 3
1 All wells were sampled for the full suite of Task Force
parameters. Individual samples were collected for VOA, POX,
POC, TOX, TOC, Extractable Organics, Dioxin/Furans, Phenol,
Total and Dissolved Metals, Cyanide, Sulfide, and Anions.
-------
TABLE 2
SAMPLE BOTTLES AND PRESERVATIVES
PREFERRED ORDER OF COLLECTION
HWGWTF EVALUATION
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
No. Parameter, Container, Preservative
2 Purge and trap (VOA), 40 ml vials
1 Purgeable organic carbon, 40 ml vial
1 Purgeable organic halogen, 40 ml vial
6 Extractable organic, 1 liter amber glass
2 Dioxin/Furan, 1 liter amber glass
1 Total metals, 1 liter plastic, HNO, pH<2
1 Dissolved metals, 1 liter plastic, HNO. pH<2
1 Total organic carbon, 4 oz. glass, H-SO, pH<2
1 Total organic halogen, 1 liter amber glass
1 Phenol, 1 liter amber, H_SO, pH<2
1 Cyanide, 1 liter plastic, NaOH pH>12
1 Anions, 1 liter plastic
1 Nitrate and ammonia, 1 liter plastic, H_SO, pH<2
1 All samples also iced to 4
Caps for all sample containers for organic parameters
contained Teflon liners/septa
-------
TABLE 3
GROUND-WATER MONITORING PARAMETERS
EVALUATED DURING HWG.WTF LABORATORY AUDIT
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
HARRISBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
GROUND WATER MONITORING WELLS
Quarterly
Barium
Cadmium
Lead
Selenium
Nitrate nitrogen
Ammonia nitrogen
Chloride
Zinc
GSE
Semi-Annu.ally Annually
pH Iron
Specific ;Conductance ; Manganese
TOG Sodium
TOX . Sulfate
Arsenic Phenols
Coliforra Aluminum
Chromium Calcium
Silver • Magnesium
Antimony
WATER SUPPLY WELLS
Quarterly
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Nitrate nitrogen
Ammonia nitrogen
Chloride
Zinc
Semi-Annually
PH
Specific Conductance
TOG
TOX
Coliform
Annually
Iron
Manganese
Sodium
Sulfate
Lead
Selenium
Calcium
Silver
Antimony
Copper
-------
-------
r\
PAGE
DH7187A.TBL
TABLE 4
ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY (METALS)
HAZ. WASTE GROUND-WATER TASK FORCE EVAL.
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COPII.
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
GWTF GUTF
WELL i1 WELL t1
(TOTAL) (DISS)
03/16/87 03/16/87
GUTF
WELL *2
(TOTAL)
GUTF
WELL
(DISS)
GUTF
WELL
(TOTAL)
GUTF
WELL »
(DISS)
GUTF
WELL #4
(TOTAL)
GUTF
WELL *4
(DISS)
GUTF
WELL «5
GUTF
UEll *5
GUTF
WELL *6
GUTF
WELL #6
GUTF
WELL *6A
GUTF
WELL *6A
GUTF
WELL 17
GUTF
WELL ft
VEIL »c MCLI « VEIL »J KlL » wtLL V, WELL (4 WELL f5 WELL «O WELL *6 WELL *o WELL >M WELL »M MILL or WILL *
(TOTAL) (DISS) (TOTAL) (DISS) (TOTAL) (DISS) (TOTAL) (DISS) (TOTAL) (DISS) (TOTAL) (DISS) (TOTAL) (OISS)
03/17/87 03/17/87 03/16/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87. OJ/17/87 03/18/87 03/18/87 03/17/87 03/17/1
INORGANIC ELEMENT/COMPOUND
SILVER
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
NICKEL
LEAD
VANADIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
UG/L
UG/L
19
3700
64
MG/l
16
11
2.7
7.9
1.2
MG/L
18
11
8.7
UG/L
8
230
12
82
9
MG/L
42
20
0.09
U
1.J
UG/L
8
110
3
260
16
110
a
MG/l
48
23
16
UG/L
6
2000
350
150
15
220
30
270000
5200
43000
MG/L
520
260
5.2
99
3.4
••FOOTNOTES***
J • ESTIMATED VALUE
-- -MATERIAL UAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
UG/L
290
240
170
14
14
280
220
25000
86
39000
MG/L
580
280
.10
110
UG/L
21
67
23
13000
5900
MG/L
610
160
0.06
120
4.0
UG/L
190
15J
80
12
11
61
16000
7000
MG/L
700
180
140
UG/l
450
3
6.1
20
20
320
4000
MG/L
2200
300
0.48
160
7.6
UG/l
520
4
4.4
10
25
147
4700
MG/L
2200
350
180
8.9
UG/L
280
61
11
17
52
14000
MG/l
BOO
140
0.1*
140
2.1
UG/L
320
4
81
16
45
81
17000
MG/L
940
160
0.02
160
UG/l
8
930
6
13
13
20
24
32
2800
MG/L
2400
310
0.40
310
11
UG/L
990
4
5.8J
27
24
51
220
29
138
3100
MG/l
2300
340
340
12
X/l
230J
74
15
310
MG/L
240
200
0.22
57
6.1
03/17/87
UG/L
270
63
59
18
340
MG/l
280
220
64
7.4
\
-------
PAGE
DH7187B.TBL
TABLE 5
METALS DATA SUMMARY (WITH REG IV SPLITS)
HAZ. WASTE GROUND-WATER TASK FORCE EVAL.
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORP.
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
GWTF IV SPLIT GWTF IV SPLIT GWTF IV SPLIT
WELL #5 WELL #5 WELL #S WELL #5 WELL #7 WELL #7
(TOTAL) (TOTAL) (DISS) (DISS) (TOTAL) (TOTAL)
03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/18/87
GWIF iv SPLIT
WELL #7 WELL #7
(DISS) (DISS)
03/17/87 03/18/87
UG/L
3
6.1
20
INORGANIC ELEMENT/COMPOUND
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
****************************************************************
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
NA
••
--
NA
NA
NA
--
20
NA
320
--
4000
MG/L
2200
300
0.48
160
7.6
--
••
--
5000
--
--
NA
--
19
--
3300
S200
MG/L
2200
390
0.90
190
NA
NA
•-
74
NA
NA
NA
--
--
NA
15
--
310
MG/L
240
200
0.22
57
6.1
--
••
--
4800
--
--
NA
--
18
13
2400
4900
MG/L
2100
360
--
170
NA
NA
--
74
NA
NA
NA
--
--
NA
15
--
310
MG/L
240
200
0.22
57
6.1
42
28
57
2100
--
--
NA
..
..
16
1400
310
MG/L
240
180
0.30
57
NA
NA
63
59
NA
NA
NA
--
..
NA
18
..
340
MG/L
280
220
..
64
7.4
44
28
280
2200
..
NA
__
16
1300
310
MG/L
250
190
59
NA
"FOOTNOTES***
NA - NOT ANALYZED
-- - MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
-------
PAGE
DH7326C.TBL
GENERAL INORGANIC PARAMETERS
CHLORIDE
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
SULFATE
GENERAL ORGANIC PARAMETERS
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
TABLE 6
ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY (ALL BUT METALS)
NAZ. WASTE GROUND-WATER TASK FORCE EVAL.
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORP.
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
GWTF GWTF GWTF GWTF GWTF IV SPLIT GWTF GWTF GWTF IV SPLIT
WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL
NO. 1 NO. 2 NO. 3 NO. * NO. 5 NO. 5 NO. 6 NO. 6A NO. 7 NO. 7
03/16/87 03/17/87 03/16/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/17/87 03/18/87 03/17/87 03/17/87
MG/L
5.0
1.4
6.6
MG/L
MG/L
53
24
70
MG/L
UG/L UG/L
MG/L
1700
180
130
HG/L
UG/L
MG/L
1600
160
74
MG/L
UG/L
MG/L
1400
1600
86
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L UG/L
UG/L UG/L
TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
SELECTED CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4.6-DIN1TROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
ETHYLMETHYLDIOXANE
TRIMETHYLTRIAZINETRIONE
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
TOTAL XYLENES
•A**************************************************************
***FOOTNOTES***
NA - NOT ANALYZED
J - ESTIMATED VALUE
N • PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
-- - MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
U - MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DFTFCTFD. THF UIMRFR IS TUP MINIMUM QUAUTI TAT I ON LIMIT
UG/L
10UR
UG/L
10UR
UG/L
UG/L
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
UG/L
10UR
UG/L
UG/L
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
UG/L
10UR
UG/L
UG/L
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
UG/L
10UR
2J
MG/L
1500
NA
130
MG/L
3.9
UG/L
NA
NA
UG/L
0.032
UG/L
2JN
4JN
UG/L
2.1J
MG/L
1000
4SO
41
MG/L
UG/L
150J
82J
UG/L
UG/L
77
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
SOUR
UG/L
10UR
25
U
MG/L
2800
1100
90
MG/L
MG/L
940
68
71
MG/L
UG/L UG/L
UG/L UG/L
UG/L UG/L
MG/L
880
NA
NA
MG/L
2.9
UG/L
NA
NA
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L UG/L
10UR 10UR
UG/L
-------
-------
APPENDICES
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
-------
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. /X?ik./r
Radiation
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: 'B
egin
End
Personnel
/A .
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot» VIA
Purge Depth
4. Sample Methods
Date >"l^~
Time: Begin //* t/^> End _/_
Personnel
Equipment
Lot * I
Sample Depth AM^
Splits Vw /_1P-
/
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water To
-x^y
• Dedicated Equipment \ft.~4'
• Casing Material
• Nonagueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Versar
c
DATA :SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection /"7
Well No. -2
Performed by
fi/1
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Time of Reading
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umfaos/cm)
Ml
Initial
(Dtf
c
OA/QC
Time of Reading
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on V
4=Jil£ 7=
Sample pH ,
pH Recheck 4=_
//« *)
Standard
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
VERSAR WELL DATASHEET
.* J _
c
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. (f^
X 3 =
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
V
3
4. Sample -Method:?
Dats
Tiioa: Begin
Personnel— *^
End
Equipment
Lot
Sample Depth
Splits.
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu,
Radiation_
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot
Purge Depth
End
5. Notes
• Facility W>
• Disposal oi
• Dedicated £
• Nonaqueous
•
-------
Rev. 1:
J / VI
4/86
DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Well Mo.
Performed by
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Time of Reading
Temperature (°C)
/ C'
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor fff
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Time of Reading _
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on ~7•
4= *f-.&<+ 7=_7±
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=
7=
Standard
1Q=
10=
*If sample fs retained for pH measurement
independent df field conditions, in-situ
.-temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 3/86
COMPLETE IN CASE OF MULTIPLE SAMPLING EVENTS
Facility
Well No.
Sampling Order
Volume
Date
Time
Personnel
VOA
POC
POX
Ext. Org.
G
^
\x
D i ox i n
3-17-87
1650
T. Metals
Diss. Metals
I
TOC
TOX
1
Phenols
V
\y
o* ~~
'i 01.
t
-------
Versar*
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
C
Date: B«g. J?
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
/
"7
End
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
/.
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Equipment
Lot *
Sample Depth A///?
Splits
End
C
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
/ ) tt-<^
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
(
DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Well No.
Performed by
£ 0-
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Time of Reading
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
-(
QA/QC
pH
Time of Reading
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on 7 O o
4= ^
1=
Sample pH
pH Recheck
4=^(^7 7=
Standard
1Q=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
i
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
C
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. M/K i/llAiL
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
End
13/9*
Rev. 1: 3/86
1. Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. / *^}
X 3 =
2. General Observations
C Organic Vapors (HNu,
••—?
Radiation_j
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
7 I
\ 1 5 < A
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot #
Time: Begin / } h ji End
Personnel j
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
, (v ' y nf-L
Equipment fisti'/-^ — /
Lot *
?
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water T-a
• Dedicated Equipment ^_
• Casing Material Q
.
U
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
Other
A/I r/-/
-------
C
1379Y
Rev. 1: 4/86
C
Vcrsai:
MC
DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Well No.
Performed by
C
C
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Time of Reading
Temperature (°C)
/3. a
<_
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/OC
Time of Reading
In-Situ* Temperature (°C>
Sample Temperature (°C) S3.
' Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on "7 00
4= ^
Standard
7=
10=
Sample pH 6
pH Recheck 4=_
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Versar.
MC.
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
.LO 1 3 i
Rev. 1: 4/86
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
End
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total pepth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
2. General Observations
C Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
Radiation
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Volume Removed
Equipment
c
Lot
Purge Depth
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth
Splits
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
,t
Date: iBeg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
End
ft
Rev. 1: 4/86
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height /#''
DTW
Total Pepth
Reference Point 7frV.8-Wv .Q;
7
/, 93
Water Column Length / ). */ End
,Personnel
Volume Removed
Equipment I/u/l// \!J\7fJilUl
Lot
Purge Depth
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
— **•
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
-------
Rev. 1: 4/8
Versai
.*
DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Well No. # /
/ j- '5
Performed by
T
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
/**• '
Time of Reading
Temperature (°C)
Uncgrrected Reading (umhos/cnO_
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
EM
Time of Reading
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on / /
.4= */
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
//
Standard
1Q=
7= 7. //
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
7.
-------
vwsar.
WC.
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg. J? A- /V 7
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO NO./FAC. No.
End
4/86
X/x£
C
/.
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (jnner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth c*
Reference Point 73V sr >
Water Column Length $. 7?
Casing Vol. 3~ 7
X3= " /f
4. Sample Methods
Date 3 7/7 /)T7
Time: Begin
Personnel
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth
Splits
End
2. General Observations
Organic Vapocs (
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Vcrsar.
.*
DATA SHEET
Site
Date
/
-3-J7-H
Time of Sample Collectiorv
Well No. ^
Performed by
' ^
10=
4= V-
7=7 1Q=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
P
-------
Versan,
VERSAR WELL 3AEA. SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
; End
- >
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total pepth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. 57'O7
X 3 =
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, (TIP
/ )
Radiation
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel M
End / 1)
Volume Removed
Equipment 'J'JIJA ^
C
Lot
Purge Depth
4.
- Method;.
r "Begin /$<
End
Personnel
Bquipment , //
Depth
- f
5. notes
• Eacility A
Baaposal or
• Itaiicated 1.
fiasing Mat'
ConditJ.ros jj.
-------
1379
Rev. l: 4/8
Versai:
MC
DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Well No. 5"
/ill
Performed by
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Time of Reading
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
PO
QA/QC
pH
Time of Reading
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on 7. C)
4= ?ff 7= -).#
Sample pH 6 •
pH Recheck 4=_
Standard
10= ff, tf
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature^ measurement must still be taken.
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
c
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. _//-"'? r^
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
'' . ' i~ •' r~.
'' 3 s_
End -ji
t )•:
Rev i: 3/86
1. Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
\
Total Depth
Water Column Length
•N • * X
Casing Vol. -\i 7- 1^7
X 3 =
4. Sample M«thbds. i
Date
Time:
Equi pme n
Lot #
Splits
Lr.d
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
/
Radiation
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin u J
Personnel 1
End
r.v ! r^'
y
Volume Removed
/
Equipment
Lot
5. Notes
• Facility-Well Seci
• Disposalnaf Purge
Dedicatedz3!quipment.
• Casing Material
Nona quesnis-- Phases
^
SamplingldSeather
• Other
'' -
-------
Rev. I;
c
DATA SHEET
C
Site
Date
3//7/YJ
Time of Sample Collection
Well No. Sfri*>& 7
Performed by
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
/;?.*?
Time of Reading
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cra)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (urohos/cm)
X^W^/'®^
/c6?jy* <^dr*ry*-6
^-^i&t&r-^rv. /^FV-
C
Initial
pH
QA/QC
c
Time of Reading /<3
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 4-0$ 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
-------
May IS, 19J6
APPENDIX IX •- GROUND UAIER MONITORING LIST
Sy sternal ic Naaie
Ac enaph t h y I ene
Acenaphthylene, 1.2-dihydro-
•. i
Acetamide. M- (4-ethoxyphenyl )-
Acet amide. H-9H- f luoren-2-yt -
Acetic acid ethenyl ester
Acetic acid, (2.4.5- tr ichlorophenoxy)-
Acetic acid. (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-
Acetonitrile
A 1 u« i niua
Anthracene
Ant imony
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
CAS RN
208 96 8
83-32-9
62 44-2 •
53 96-3
108 05-4
93 76 5
94 75 - 7
75 05-8
7429 90 5
120 12 7
7440-36 0
12674-11-2
11104 28 2
11141-16-5
53469 21-9
12672-29 6
Coaoton fcaaw
Acenaphthalene
Ac enaph thene
Phenacet in
2-Acetylaainof luorene
Vinyl acetate
2.4.5 1
2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
Acetoni trile
Aluailnua (total)
Anthracene
Ant tawny (total)
Aroclor 1016
Aroctor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248 .
-------
Nay IS, 1986
APPENDIX IX -• GROUND-WATER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Naaw
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
\ <
Arsenic
Bariua)
Beni [al anthracene, 7. 12 -dine thy I •
Benz (i)«ceanthry(ene. I ,2-dihydro- 3-«ethy( •
Beni (el acephenanthrylene
Benzaaide, 3.5-dichloro-N- ( 1 , 1 -diaethyl 2 propynyl )-
Benz la) anthracene
Benzenaaine '
Benzenaain*, 2-aethyl -5-ni tro-
Benzena*in«( 2-nitro-
Benzefaaiinv, 5-nitro-
Benzenaarfnc, 4-chloro-
Benienaaine, 4-nitro-
Benzenanine, 4.4' ••ethylenebis (2-chloro-
CAS RN
11097 69 1
11096 52 5
7440 38-2
7440 39-3
57-97-6
56-49 5
205 99-2
23950 58-5
56-55 3
62-53-3
99 55 8
88-74-4
99-09-2
106-47-8
100-01-6
101-T4-4
Coaaton Na»e
Aroclor 1254
Aroctor 1260
Arsenic (total)
Bariua (total)
7,12-Di*ethylbenz(a)anthracene
3 Nethytcholanthrene
Benzo(b)f luoranthene
Pronaaiide
Benz (a) anthracene
Anilint
5 Nitro-o toluidine
2-Hitroaniline
3 Nitroani line
p-Chloroani I in*
p-Ni troani 1 ine
4, 4 '-Nethylencbis(2 -chloroani line)
-------
Hay IS. 196*
APPENDIX IX -• GROUND WATEI MONITORING LISI
Systematic Naate
•enzenaanne. N-ni troso-H-phenyl-
Benzenapine. N-phenyl-
«. •
Benzenanine, N,N-di*ethy( -4- (phenytazo) •
•eniene
Benzene, 1 -broaM-4-phenoKy-
• cniene, 1 -chloro-4 -phenoxy-
Benzene. 1 -•ethyl -2.4-dini tro-
•eniene. 1. 1 • -(2.2.2- tr ichloroethy Hdene)bis(«-chloro-
•eniene, 1. 1« • (2.2.2- trichlorocthyl idene)bis[4-»ctho*y-
Beruene, 1 , 1 ' - (2.2-dichloroethyl idene)bis (4-chJoro-
•eniene, 1,1' • (dichloroethenyl idene)bis|4-chloro-
Beniene, 1.2-dlchtoro-
Benienc, 1,2.*- trlehloro-
Benxene. 1 ,2.4.5- t«trach(oro-
Benzene, 1.3-dichloro-
Benzene, 1.4 -dichloro-
CAS RN
06 30-6
122-39-4
60-11 T
71 43 2
101-55-3
7005 72 3
121 14 2
50-29 3
72 43 5
72-54 8
72 55-9
95-50 1
120 82-1
95-94 3
541 73-1
106-46-7
Coawon Naa*
N-Nltrotodlphenyla«int
Diphenytaaine
p Oi»ethyla«inoazobenzene
Benien*
4 Broawphtnyl phenyt ether
4-Chlorophenyt phenyt ether
2.4-Dinitrototuene
DDT
Hethoxychlor
ODD
DDE
o - D 1 eh 1 orobenzene
1,2,4-Irlchlorobeniene
1,2.4.5- r«trach(orob«nzene
•-Dlchlorobcnxene
p • 0 i ch 1 orob«nz ene
-------
Nay IS, 1986
APPENDIX IX •- GROUMO-UATER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Na*e
Benzene. 1,4-dinitro-
Benzene. 2-aethyt - 1,3-dini tro-
Benzene, chioro-
Benzene, diawthyl-
Benzene, ethenyl-
Benzene. ethyl-
Benzene, hexachloro-
Benzene. *ethyl-
Benzene, nitro-
Benzene, pentachtoro-
Benzene, pentachloronitro-
Benzenaacatic acid, 4-chloro-o<:(4-ch(oroplienyl )-^i-hydroxy- ,
«,thyl altar
'
1.2 Benzanadlcarboxyl ic acid. bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester
1.2-Benzenadicarbonyl ic acid, butyl phenylvethyl eiter
CAS RN
100-25-4
606-20 2
108 90 7 '
1330 20-7
100 42 5
100-41-4
118-74-1
108-88 3
98 95 3
608-93-5
82 68-8
510-15-6
117-81-7
85-68-7
CoMMon Haaw
•eta-Oinitrobenzene
2,6-Oini trototuene
Chlorobenzene
Xylane (total)
Styrene
Ethyl benzene
Menachlorobenzene
Toluena
Nitrobenzene
Pent ach 1 orobenzene
Pentachloroni trobenzene
Chlorobenzi (ate
• is(2 ethylhexyl) ph thai ate
Butyl benzyl pdthalata
1.2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dibutyl ester
84 74 2
Din butyl phthalate
-------
May 15, 1986
APPENDIX IX •- GROUND WATER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Name
1,2-Benzenedicarboxyl ic acid, diethyl ester
1.2 Benzenedicarboxyl ic dcid. dlaMthyl after
i •
1,2-Benzenedicarboxyl ic acid, dloctyl ester
1.3-Benzenediot
Benzeneethanaaine, «(,«{-diaethyl -
lent enene t hano I
Benzenethiol
1,3 Beniodioxole. 5-(1 -property 1 )•
1 ,3- Beniodioxole, 5- (2-propenyt )-
Benzo(k) f luoranthene
Benxotc acid
Benzolrstlpcntaphtna
Bento(JBhllp«ry(«nt
Benzolalpyrtna
Beryllius
(1.1'-Biphenyl)-4,4'-diMiine. 3.3' -dichloro-
CAS IN
84 66 2
131-11-3
117 84 0 '
108 46 3
122 09 8
100 51 6
108 98 5
120-58 1
94-59 7
207 08 9
65 85 0
189 55 9
191-24-2
50 32 8
7440-41-7
91 94-1
COWMMI Na*t
Diethyl phthalate
*
Diaethyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phtbalate
Reiorclnol
alpha,alpha-0iaethylphenethyla*in*
Benzyl alcohol
Benzenethiol
Isosafrole
Safrole
Benzo( k ) 1 I uor anthene
Benzole acid
Dibenzola, ijpyrene
Benzo(ghi )perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Berylliu* (total)
3,3' -'Dichlorobenzidine
-------
Hay IS. 1986
APPENDIX IX -• GROUND WATER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Na*e
(1.11 Biphenyl)-4.4'-dia«lne. 3,3'-dlMthoxy
11, 1'-Bipheny 1] -4.4'- diaaiine. 3.3'-diMthyl -
11. 1'-Biphenyt)-4-aanne
M.I' Biphenyl) 4,4' diaaine
1,5 Butadiene. 2-chloro-
1-Butanaiaina. N butyl -N-ni tro»o-
2-Butanone
2-Butene, 1 ,4-dichloro- , (£)•
Cadaiu*
Calciua
Carbon diaulfide
ChroaiJua
Chrysent
Cobalt
Copper
CAS RN
1)9-90-4
119-93 7
92 67-1 '
92 87 5
87 68 3
126-99 8
924-16 J
78 93 3
110 57 6
7440-43 9
7440-70-2
75 15-0
7440-47-3
218-01 9
7440-48-4
7440 50-8
Coaaon Na»e
3,3' Oiatethoxybenzidine
3.3* Di*ethytb«niidine
4- Aainobiphcnyl
•entidine
Hexachlorobutadiene
2-Chloro- t.3-butadienc
N-Nitroaodi -n-butyla*ine
Methyl ethyl ketone
trana-1.4-Dichloro-2-butene
CadMiuai (total)
Calciuai (total)
Carbon ditulfide
Chroaiua (total)
/
Chrytene
Cobalt (total)
Copper (total)
-------
Nay IS. 1986
APPENDIX IX •• GROUND-KATE* MONITORING LIST
Systematic Na*e
CAS RN
COMOA Naate
Cyanide
57-12 5
Cyan id*
2.5 Cyclohexadiene- 1,4-dione
106- 51 -4
p-lenioquinone
Cyclohexan*, 1.2,3.4.5.6 hexachloro , < 1<*.2«<.3 A ,4o<,5 A,<
319 84-6
alpha INC
Cyclohexane, 1.2,3,4,5.6 hexachloro . M0(,2 A,3«<,4 ^,S«rf.6 £) 319 85 7
beta INC
Cyclohexane. 1.2.3.4.5.6 hexachloro . < 1ethyl-
78-59-1
liophorone
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 1,2,3.4,S.S-hexachloro-
77-47-4
Nexachlorocyclopentadiene
Dtbeni (a, hi anthracene
S3- 70-3
Of b«ntta. h| anthracene
Dibenzotb.e) (1,4)dioxin. 2,3.7.8- tetrachioro-
1746-01-6
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenio-p-dioxin
Pentach(orodlb«nzo-p-diox(rtf
etrachJorodib^nio-p-dloxina
-• • ---
ttofurBn
••! '• -icrto/uran*
-------
j;
ta
I
^
o
*
vu
«
3
Q
i
OK
13
•
X
X
a
a!
*
|
C
X
u
—
«
<
U
*
•
*
u
•~
a
G
•i
••
X
I/I
e
•
b
3
ibentof
e
^
u
^
e
•
e
b
ibeniof
|
o
u
w
*
••
-
e
b
^
o
•
1"
m
o
*
•
*•
S*
e «
— -o
w
?
M
. •
•"
.•j«L
^o •
>•> «
*S^t*
i« •
•« -0
$5
j»^_
*°.i5
£<«L
^V
tt •
c —
41 —
" K .
O O
.3 TJ
i** X
.IM —
•* U
e. o
^•N>.
e .
e •
c. ««^
•"0 r,
t> . %
— . K.
OB.
o r*
^."
o
b
o
X **
o e
— a
****jta
"t »
^ <^
^ ^
-»
8*V
_ , ,
1-2
"S.*^
Ss
• -a
j: x
Ss
— 41
a £
0 *
in
_^
»•
c
e
o
**.
«.
»
IM
^
V
e
o •
a
•*
•"
c
s
I
2
**
X
X
«n
a
m
in
e
«
0
^
"c
3K
Tl
X
41
c
"m
c
^
\u
C
'I
^
X
4>
"x
1
VI
e
b
**
X
X
•0
in
o>
in
m
o
,
o
t/t
0
.M
c
X
H
S
X
*r
c
'j
•
c
^
UJ
c
'I
n.
"x
1
«l
e
b
X
X
•0
»
in
m
o
o
0
4^
<(M
C
X
^0
X
^
S
X
*r
c
Ethana*
e
e
o
jz
u
o
M
^p
m
.
e
e
JC
u
•5
-%
••
Ethane.
5 '
1
X
K
i
w
o
^g
u
^
7
o>
j;
0
o
u
X
3
•n
r.
«
C
^
J^
X
1
^
••
c
IM
b
^
^
*«
O
b
o
^
u
*^
f
^
»•
0
b
e
u
IM
M^
d
•g
0
-.
~
Ethane.
|
0
o
u
b
«
•O
m
m
O
0
^
£
w
b
—
"
Ethane,
41
*
41
0
b
O
U
41
IM
•
•O
IM
O
Kt
-O
,
o
b
o
u
b
•0
4>
IM
«
-*
^
Ethane,
-------
Nay IS, 1986
APPENDIX IX -• GROUND-WATER NOMITORINC LIST
Systematic Nave
CAS RH
Common NaM
Ethane. 1.1,2-trichloro-
79 00-5
1.1,2-Trlchlorocthane
Ethane, 1,1.2.2-tetrachloro-
79 34 5
1.1,2,2-!•!rachloroethane
Ethane, 1.2-dibroau>-
106 91 4 *
1,2 -0 ibroaM>e thane
Ethane, 1,2-dichloro-
107-06-2
1,2-Oichloroethane
Ethane, chloro-
75 00 3
Chloroethan*
Ethane, henachloro-
67 72-1
Heiachloroethane
Ethane, pentachloro-
76 01-7
Pentachloroethane
1,2 Ethanediaaine. N,N-di«ethyl N1 -2 pyridinyl N' • (2- thienylatethyl )- 91 80 5
Methapyrl(ene
Ethanone. 1-phenyl
98 86-2
Acetophenon*
Ethene. (2-chloroethoxy)-
110-75 8
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Ethene. 1,1-dichloro-
75 35-4
1,1-Dichlorocthylene
Ethene, 1.2-dichloro-. (E)
156 60 5
tran»-1,2-Dichloro«then«
Ethen«j, ckloro-
75 01-4
Vinyl chloride
Ethene. tatrathloro-
127 18-4
Tttrachloroathan*
Ethene, trichloro-
79-01-6
Irlchloroethene
fluoranthene
206-44-0
Fluoranthene
-------
Nay 15, 1986
APPENDIX IX •• GROUND-WATER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Naa>e
fluoride
9H-Huorene
2-Hexanone
Nydraiine, 1,2-diphenyl •
IndenoM ,2,3-cdlpyrene
Iron
lead
Magnesiu*
Manganese
Mercury
Methanaaiine. N-»ethyl -N-ni troso-
Methane, broaw-
Mcthan*, broawdichloro-
Methane, chtoro-
Methane, dibroaw
CAS RN
16984 48-8
86-73-7
591 78-6 '
122 66-7
191 39-5
7459-89 6
7439-92-1
7439 95 4
7439-96 5
7439-97-6
62-75-9
74-83-9
75-27-4
74-87-3
74-95-3
Coavon Naac
t i uor I de
f luorent
2-Nexanone
1 . 2-Oiphenylhydraiine
lndeno( 1 .2, 3 • cd)pyrene
Iron (total)
Lead (total)
Magnet iua (total)
Manganese (total)
Mercury (total)
N-Nltroaodiawthylaaine
•ro*oaw thane
•ro«od i chl oro*e thane
Chlorovethane
Dibroaxwtethant
Methane. dibroa>ochloro-
124 48-1
Chl»rodibroaio««thane
-------
May 15, '1986
APPENDIX IX •• GROUND UAIER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Naate
Methane, dichloro-
Methane, dichlorocii f luoro-
• 4
Methane, iodo-
Methane. tetrachloro-
Methane. tribro«o-
Methane. trichloro-
Methane, tr ichlorof luoro-
Methanesulfonic acid. Methyl ester
Methanethiol , trichloro-
4, 7- Methano- IN- indene. 1 ,2,4,5,6, 7,8,8-octachloro 2,3.3a.4, 7. 7a
hexahydro-
4. 7- Methano- IN- indene. 1.4.5,6, 7.8.8 -heptachloro-3a. 4.7. 7a- tetra •
hydro-
2,5-H«th«no-2N-lnd*no(1,2-bloiiirene. 2. 3.4. 5.6. 7. 7 heptachtoro- la.
6,9 Methano- 2.4.3 -beniodioxathiepin, 6,7.8.9. 10. 10- hexachloro- 1.5.
5a.6,9,9a-hexahydro- . 3-oxide, <3o/,5a f^,6 e
Dichloroatethane
Dichlorodif luoroatethane
lodo*e thine
Carbon tetrachlor ide
1 ribr o« o«e thane
Chlorofora)
Irichlorononofluoroaiethane
Methyl «ethanesulfonate
Trichloroaethanethio!
Chlordane
Heptacblor
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan 1
6.9 Methano-2.4.3-beniodioxathiepin. 6,7,8,9.10.10-hexachloro-1, 5, 33213-65-9
5a,6,9,9a-hex«hydro-, 3 oxide, (i£X,5a^,6 A,9 A,<
EndosulIan
11
-------
Nay IS. 1986
APPENDIX IX -- GROUND-WATER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Naaw
1,3,4 Metheno 2H-cyclobuta(cd)pentalen-2 one, 1. 1a.3.3a.4,5.5.5e.
5b, 6 -detach lorooc (ahydro-
1.2,4 Net henocyc lop«nt a fed) pcntal enc- 5 -carboxaldehyde. 2,2a.3,3,4.
7 hexachlorodecahydro . ( 1
-------
Nay 15. 1986
APPENDIX IX •• GROUND-WATER MOM I TOR INC LIST
Systematic Name
CAS RN
Cowaon Hi
Phenol
108 95-2
Phenol
Phenol. 2 (1 »ethylpropyl)-4.6-dlnttro-
88 85 7
2 tec-lutyl-4.6 dlnitrophenol
Phenol, 2-chloro-
95 57 8
2-Chlorophenol
Phenol. 2 nethyl
95-48-7
ortho-Cretol
Phenol. 2 methyl-4.6 dinitro
554 52-1
4.6-Oinitro-o-cresol
Phenol. 2-nitro-
88-75-5
2 Nitrophenol
Phenol, 2.2'••ethylenebisf.3,4,6-trichloro-
70-30-4
Hexachlorophene
Phenol .
Phenol .
Phenol ,
Phenol ,
Phenol .
Phenoll.
Phenol .
Phenol .
Phenol .
2.
2.
2,
2.
2,
2.
2.
3.
4-
4-
4-
4-
4.
4,
2.6
4
4.6- tetrachloro-
dichloro-
dimethyl-
dimethyl-
dfnftro-
5-trlchloro-
6- trlchloro-
dichloro-
chloro-3-nethyl -
58
90 2
120-83-2
105
•67-9
105-67-9
51
95
88
87-
59
28-5
95 4
06-2
65 0
50-7
2.
2.
2,
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
P-
3, 4, 6 -Tetrachlorophenol
4 -Oichlorophenol
4-Dtawthylphenol
4-Dimethytphtnol -
4-Dinitrophenot
4.5-THchlorophenol
4.6-Trichlorophenol
6- Oichlorophenol
Chloro-m-creiol
-------
May 15. 1986
APPENDIX IX •- GROUND WATER MONITORINC LIST
Systematic Naaw
Phenol. 4-*ethyl-
Phenol, 4-nitro-
« •
Phenol, pentachloro-
Phosphorodithioic acid. 0.0-df«thyl S- Kethyl th(o)Mthyl] ester
Phosphorodithioic acid, 0.0-diethyl $• |2-o-3-chloro-
Propane. 1,2-dichloro-
Propane. 1,2.3- trichloro-
CAS RN
106-44-5
100 02-7
87-86-5
298 02-2
298 04-4
52-85-7
56-38-2
297-97-2
298 00 0
100 75-4
7440-09 7
621-64-7
96-12-8
78-87-5
96-18 4
CoMon Naa«
para-Cresol
4-Hi trophenol
Pentachloropnenol
Phorate
Oisulfoton
r
Faopliur
Parathlon
0,0 Diethyl 0-2 pyraiinyl phosphoroth-
ioate
;
Methyl parathion
N-Nitrotopiperidine
Potass IUM (total)
Di -n-propylnl trostailne
1 . 2 -0 1 broaw -3 • chl oropropane
1 , 2 - 0 i ch 1 or opr opane
1 , 2 , 3 • T r i ch 1 or opr opane
14
-------
Nay 15. I486
APPENDIX IX • GROUND WATER NONITORING IIST
Systematic Na*e
Propane. 2,2' -oxybisd -chloro-
Propanedinl tril*
Propanenitri Ic
Propanenitrile, 3-chloro-
Propanoic acid. 2- (2,4,5 • tr ichlorophenony )-
1-Propanol. 2.3-dibroam- . phosphate (3:1)
1-Propanol, 2-aethyl-
2-Propanone
2-Propenal
1-Propenc. 1, 1.2. 3.3,3 -hexachloro-
1-Propene. 1,3-dichloro- . (E)-
1 Propene. 1.3 dlcMoro- , (2)
1-Pronen*. 3-chloro-
2-Prop«n«nitril«, 2-awthyl-
2-Propeneni trl le
2-Propenoic acid, 2 ncthyl , ethyl ester
CAS RN
108 60-1
109 77 3
107 12 0'
542-76-7
93 72 1
126 72 7
78 83-1
67-64-1
107 02 8
1888 71 7
10061-02-6
10061-01 5
107-05-1
126-98-7
107 13-1
97 63-2
CoMton Maa«
• is(2-cMoroisopropy!) ether
Nalononi trl It
Ethyl cyanide
3 Ch 1 or oprop i on i t r i I e
Silven
Iris (2,3-dibroaopropyl ) phosphate
Isobutyl alcohol
Acetone
Acrolein
Hexach I oropropcne
tram- 1.3 -Dichloropropene
cis 1,3 Dichloropropcnc
3- ChloroproptM
Nethacryloni trlle
Acrylonitrile
Ethyl Mthacrylate
15
-------
Hay 15. 1986
APPENDIX IX •- GROUND-UATE* MONITORING LIST
Systematic Name
2-Propenoic acid. 2-methyl-, Methyl ester
2-Propen- 1 -ol
1 — ! vj r_
2-Propyn- 1 -ol
Pyrene
Pyridine
Pyridine. 2 methyl-
Pyrrol idine. 1-nitroso-
Selentum
Si I ver
Sodium
SuHide
CAS IN
80 62 6
107-18 6
107 19 7 '
129 00-0
110-86-1
109 06 «
930 55-2
7782 49 2
7440-22-4
7440 23 5
18496 25-8
CoMaon Nam«
Methyl methacrylate
Allyl alcohol
2-Propyn-1-ol
Pyrene
Pyridtnc
2 Ptcoiine
N-Mitrosopyrrol idine
Selenium (total)
Silver (total)
Sodium (total)
Sulfide
Sulfurout acid, 2-chloroethyl 2- 14- ( 1.1 -dimethylethyl)phenoxy]-1•
methylathyl ester
140 57 8
Araalte
Thai!
7440-28-0
Thallium (total)
Ihiodiphosphorlc acid (l(MO)^ P(S)l^O). tetraethyl ester
3689 24 5
Tetraethyldi thiopyrophosphate
Tin
7440 31 5
Tin (total)
-------
Nay IS.
APPENDIX IX •- GROUND WATER MONITORING LIST
Systematic Naa*
CAS RN
Common Naate
Toxaphene
8001-35-2
Toxaphene
Vanadiu*
7440 62-2
Vsnadlui (total)
Zinc
7440 66-4
Zinc (total)
17
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
-------
-------
EP TOXICITY ANALYSES
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT SAMPLES
MINERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
niNSriTlllNf:
ARSfNIf
i.o
HAN HIM
IUI). I)
1.0
CHROMIUM
1.0
I IAD
i.o
U.2U
SH INIIIri
I.U
SII.Vt.M
I.U
1.02
• 7.08
7.21
7.04
.18
.24
.2H
.10
.011
.11)6
.010
.01)
.046
.020
.II2H
.(IK.
.121
.047
.046
.02)
.(Mlllh
.004 1
.028
.0009
.1102
.002
.046
.UU2
.002
.002
.002
.IK) I
.008
.00)
.001
.001
.16
.40
.61
1.17
1.78
2.17
1.88
.011
.018
.us)
9.48
9.19
6.16
9.0V
.0002
.OOO1
.(Ml Id
.000}
.1102
.002
.mi 2
.002
.004
.00)
.0112
.004
.001
.001
.002
.1X12
1.01
.78
1.68
1.14
.166
.144
.470
.024
.Old
.0?0
.017
1.19
2.96
1.20
1.00
.OO06
.0010
.OOI4
.0009
.002
.OII2
.OOI
.001
.1)04
.not)
.nob
.00 7
.001
.001
.001
.001
.62
.11
.70
.92
1.20
2.16
1.12
2.6)
.021
.014
.016
.018
21.0
IS.I
1.74
4.69
.OOO2
.OIKIl
.000)
.0001
.002
.U01
.002
.002
.OOb
.nut
.1)06
.1106
A
B
r
o
»:
F
r.
H
i
j
K
H
M
O
.Oil
.001
.004
.001
.412
.008
.021
.1111)
.116
.002
.02)
.001
.819
.021
.OOI
.OOI
.0211
. IB
.48
. JH
.12
.49
.17
.46
.1)
.42
.11
. 19
.40
. )8
.'•0
.61
.248
.117
.446
.1)4
.171
.801
.19*
.299
.166
.114
.HI
.101
.112
.417
.296
.248
.0)8
.061
.040
.640
.192
.141
.Ob)
.414
.0/9
.408
.066
.ObH
. 1 IB
.022
.046
.072
.098
.111
.077
. 29H
.878
. 146
.069
.416
.117
.7M
.078
1 1
.089
.1 11
.OH 6
.0001
.00(11
.OIIJ4
.00118
.0004
.OU01
.0009
.OHIO
.1)1(06
.0014
.111107
.OOIO
.01106
.0009
.onll
.0012
.001
.OOI
.001
.001
.00.'
.007
.002
.00)
.OO.'
.IKI2
.002
.00)
.002
.01)4
.001
.001
.OO.'
.OO2
.00}
.001
.ODD
. 004
. (Mlh
.OOb
.1106
.OII4
. IIO6
.01))
. OO6
. oou
. OO 1
.oul
»tn Com em r»l Ion limit
•'All .1
FROM: PILKO AND ASSOCIATES, 1985
"ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF MRDC"
-------
-------
APPENDIX D
-------
-------
3
-»>••
3
TABLE 1
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION
]
]
Well
No.l
1
2
3
4
5
6
Date
' Installed
7/16/81
7/16/81
7/16/81
7/16/81
7/16/81
7/16/81
Depth
Drilled '
(ft.)
13.5
19.0
17.5
14.0
14.0
13.5
Well
Depth
- (ft.)
12.0
19.0
17.5
13.5
14.0
13.5
Screen
Length
(ft.)
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
Standpipe
Height
(ft.)
2.0
1.5
3.0
2.0
1.5
2.0
> Depth to j" .
Water After J
Drilling (ft.))
9.0
17.0
15.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
Standing
Water Afte;
Drilling (f-
3.0
2.0
2.0
7.5
8.0
7.5
]
]
]
-------
-------
c
c
SECTION II
NUS WELL RECORDS
-------
-------
NUS WELL RECORD
Mineral Research & Development
1A (Borehole only)
'reject:
:ell No.:
coordinates: __^
n-Site Geologist: s. Frush
levation (top of pipe):
levation (land surface):
levation (water table):
ate Measured:
tatus Of Well: Sealed with Quikrete
CASING
Type: None
Diameter:
Length:
Type of Joint:
Screen Slot: ~
Screen Length:
Screen Setting:"
DRILLING
rilling Started: _
rilling Completed:
rilling Company:
7/14/81
7/14/81
Subsurface
ermit NO.
\ Investigations
None Needed _
Of Driller: Buddy Steohenson
ype Of Rig: Rotarv (Auaer)
r-illing Fluid: None
HOLE DATA
Die Diameter: 7.5
lickness of Overburden: 15.0 ft.
?pth Drilled in Rock: p
3tal Depth of Hole: ie.o ft.
DEVELOPMENT
ithod: None
GRAVEL
Type: _
Size: _
Volume:
Depth:
None
GROUT
Type: _
Method:
Vo 1ume:
Depth:
None
Type:
BACKFILL
Ouikrete Cement
COMMENTS
5 ft. of auger left.in borehole-
sealed with cement.
Hole is 15 ft. scutjhwest of ~
well no. 1.
DRILLING LOG
From
Depth
To
Formation
Description
ft.- 3.5 ft.
5ft.- 4
<=*-.- 6
ft. -10
ft.
ft.
ft.
f*-.-L4 ft.
ft. -15
ft. -15
ft.
ft.
Red-brown clavev sandv loam - nodular
Chocolate brown clavev sandv loam - nodular
Lt. brown nodular clavev sar.dv loam .
Lt. brown verv clavev silt loara chunkv
Rock with It. brcwn and red clavev silt.loam
Rock with" reddish clavev silt loam .
Rock - no clavev silt loam
BOH at aucer refusal
/shear pin snagged)
lotrol
- — *
-------
j
•c
.*«
1
I
.3
3
3
3
n
J
NUS WELL RECORD
Mineral Research s Development,
Project:
Well No.:"
Coordinates: _^
On-Site Geologist: s. Frush
Inc.
Type:
CASING
PVC - Schedule 40
Elevation (top of pipe;:
Elevation (land surface):
Elevation (water table):
Date Measured:
Status Of Well:
Diameter:
Length:
in.
20.5 ft.
Type of Joint: clued
Screen Slot:
No. 10 (.01 in.)
Screen Length:
Screen Setting:"
5.5 ft.
13.5 ft.
complete
DRILLING
Drilling Started:
Drilling Completed: 7/15/81
7/16/81
GRAVEL
Clean sand
Drilling Company: subsurface
, Investigations
Permit No.:
Type: _
Size:
Volume: Q ft.)
Depth: 10 ft.
Medium to coarse
None needed
Name Of Driller; Buddv Stenhenson,
Type Of Rig: Rotarv (Auaer)
Drilling Fluid:
GROUT
Quikrete
HOLE DATA
Hole Diameter:
Type: _
Method: Premix & tamp
Volume: (2 ft.)
Depth: s ft.
7.5 in.
Thickness of Overburden:19.oft.
Depth Drilled in Rock: 6
Total Depth of Hole:
19.0ft.
DEVELOPMENT
Method: Surging with potable water
BACKFILL
Type: Natural material and clean
sand
COMMENTS
Drilled 5 adjacent auger borings
each 3 ft. deep and encountered
boulders - Quikrete collar
DRILLING LOG
Depth
From To
ft.-
ft.
Formation
Descriptio'n
Reddish brown, clayey silt loam
ft.- 6.5 ft.
Same as above but very nodular
6.5 ft.- 14
ft.
14 ft.- 19
ft.
Reddish brown clayey loam - large chunks (moisture)
Liaht brown clayey loam •
BOH at auger refusal
Water level after drilling - 17 ft. below ground-- surface
.i-
-------
J
3
C
1
NUS WELL RECORD
Project: Mineral Research £ Development, Inc.
Well No.: 3
Coordinates:
On-Site Geologist: s. Frush
Elevation (top of pipej:
Elevation (land surface):
Elevation (water table):
Date Measured:
Status Of Well: complete
7/16/81
DRILLING
Drilling Started: _
Drilling Completed:
Drilling Company: subsurface
t Investigations
Permit No.:
7/16/81
None needed
Name Of Driller: Buddv Stephenson
Type Of Rig: Rotary (Auger)
Drilling Fluid: None
HOLE DATA
Hole Diameter:
7.5 in.
Thickness of Overburden: 17.5 ft.
Depth Drilled in Rock: o
Total Depth of Hole: 17.5 ft.
DEVELOPMENT
Method: suraed with notable water
Type:
CASING
PVC - Schedule 40
Diameter: 4 in.
Length: 20.5 ft.
Type of 3oint: clued
Screen Slot: No. 10 (.01
in.)
Screen Length: 5.5 ft.
Screen Setting: 12.0 ft.
GRAVEL
Gravel and sand
Type:
Size: Road Grade
Volume: (8 ft.)
Depth: 9.5 ft.
GROUT
Quikrete
Type:
Method: Premix s tamp
Volume: (2 ft.)
Depth: 7.5 ft.
Type:
BACKFILL
Natural material
COMMENTS
QuLkrete collar
»
]
From
Depth
To
ft. - 6 ft.
ft. - 14 ft.
14 ft. - 17.5 ft.
17.5 ft.
DRILLING LOG
Formation
Description
Lt. brown sandy loam
Lt. brown sandy clayey loam - clodding
Lt. brown sandy, clayey loam - large chunks
Rock
BOH at aucer refusal
Water level after drilling - 15.5 ft. below ground
1
10
-------
NUS WELL RECORD
Project: Mineral Research S Development,
Well No.: 4
Coordinates:
On-Site Geologist: s. Fraish
Inc.
Elevation (top of pipe):
Elevation (land surface):"
Elevation (water table):
Date Measured:
Status of Well:"
Complete
DRILLING
Drilling Started:
Drilling Completed"
Drilling Company: subsurface
7/16/81
7/16/81
Investigations
Permit No.: None needed
Name Of Driller: Buddy Stephenson
Type Of Rig: Rotary (Augec)~
Drilling Fluid: None
HOLE DATA
Hole Diameter:
7:5 in.
Thickness of Overburden:
Depth Drilled in Rock: _
Total Depth of Hole:
14.0 ft.
14.0 ft.
DEVELOPMENT
Method: surced with potable water
Type:
CASING
PVC-Schedule 40
Diameter: 4 in.
Length: 15. 0 ft.
Type of Joint: clued
Screen Slot: NO. 10
(.01 in.)
Screen Length: 5.5 ft.
Screen Setting: a.o ft.
GRAVEL
Gravel and sand
Type: _
Size:
Volume: 16.o ft.
Depth: 6.5 ft.
Road grade
GROUT
Gravel and sand
Type:
Method: Premix & tamp
Volume: (2 ft.)
Depth: 4.5 ft.
Type:
BACKFILL
Natural materials
COMMENTS
Cmikrete collar
DRILLING LOG
Depth
From Tp_
ft. - 3.5 ft_.
^5_fi^- 5 ft.
Formation
Description
Oranae - brown, verv sandy loam
Lt....brown, very sandy loam
ft, -14
ft
Lt. brown, clavev, sandy loam - large chunks -wet
BOH at aucer refusal
Water level after drilling - 6 ft. below ground surface
11
-------
J
c
*j
n
a
3
3
I
3
3
NUS WELL RECORD
Project: Mineral Research S Development, Inc.
CASING
Well No.:
Coordinates: _^
On-Site Geologist: s. Frush
Elevation (top of pipe):
Elevation (land surface):"
Elevation (water table):
Date Measured:
Status of Well:"
DRILLING*
Drilling Started:
Drilling Completed:
Drilling Company:
7/16/81
7/16/81
Investigations
Permit No.: NO"° ^0^,30,3
Name Of Driller: Buddy Sephenson
Type of Rig: Rotary (Auger^
Drilling Fluid: None
HOLE DATA
Hole Diameter:
7.5 in.
Thickness of Overburden: 14.0 ft.
Depth Drilled in Rock: o
Total Depth of Hole: 14.o ft.
DEVELOPMENT
Method: Suraed with potable watei
Type: PVC-5chedu3.e 40
Diameter: 4 in.
Length: 15.5 ft.
Type of Joint: clued
Screen Slot: NO.no (.01 in.)
Screen Length:
Screen Setting:"
5.5 ft.
8.5 ft.
Type:
Size:
GRAVEL
Clean sand;S gravel
Road grade
Volume: (12 ft.)
Depth: 2.0 ft.
GROUT
Cmikrete
Type: __
Method: Premix & tamp
Volume: (2 ft.)
Depth:
o ft.
Type:
BACKFILL
None
COMMENTS
Quikrete collar
Depth
From Tp_
o ft. - 5 ft.
5 ft. - 14 ft.
DRILLING LOG
Formation
Description
Reddish brown, sandv learn
Lt. brown, sandv, clayey loam, large chunks
BOH at aucer refusal
Water level after drilling - 6 ft. below ground surface
i
12
-------
J
c
3
3
I
3
NUS WELL RECORD
Project: Mineral Research S Development, Inc.
Well No.
Coordinates: '
On-Site Geologist? s. Frush
Elevation (top of pipe): '
Elevation (land surface):
Elevation (water fable):
Date Measured:
Status Of Well: 'complete
7/16/81
DRILLING
Drilling Started: _
Drilling Completed;:
Drilling Company: subsurface
' Investigations
Permit No.:
7/16/81
Nona_ needed
Name Of Dr i1ler: Buddv Steohenson
Type Of Rig: Rotary (Aucer)
Drilling Fluid: t?one
HOLE DATA
Hole Diameter:
7.5 in.
Thickness of Overburden: 13.5 ft.
Depth Drilled in Rock: p
Total Depth of Hole:
13.5 ft.
DEVELOPMENT
Method: Surged with potable water
CASING
PVC-Schedule 40
4 in.
Type:
Dia/neter:
Length: is.5 ft.
Type of Joint:
Glued
Screen Slot: NO. 10 (.01 in.)
Screen Length:
Screen Setting:"
5.5 ft.
8.0 ft.
GRAVEL
Type: Clean sand and gravel
Size:
Road grade
Volume: (9 ft.)
Depth: 4.5 ft.
GROUT
Quikrete
Type:
Method: Premix & tamp
Volume: (2 ft.)
Depth: 2.5 ft.
BACKFILL
Type: Gravel S sand
COMMENTS
Cmikrete collar
3
3
3
Depth
From Tp_
o ft. - 1.5 ft.
l.s ft. - 3.5 ft.'
3.5 ft. - 13.5 ft/
13.5 ft.
DRILLING LOG
Formation
Description
Reddish brown, clavev loam
JLt. brown, siltv, clavev loam - nodular
Lt. brown, sandv, clavev loam, large chunks -
moisture
Rock
BOH at aucer refusal
Water level after drillinq-6 ft. below ground surface
3
i
3
13
-------
3
C
_i
3
3
3
•*
3
t
j
L
SECTION XII
N.C. WELL LOGS
-------
-f
j
1
c
_J
J
J
.1
°.o. aox :76a; -
I-LING CO:~?J..TTOR Subsurface Invp«;tig-';'EC. MO.
. -1' ^.•.:-'.TJ,K- SECTION
.C. mil
WELL CSNSTPUCTIOH PES.-IT NO.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
f.
7.
8.
9.
WELL LCCAT:;::: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest T^-mr Concord , N.C.
_county: Cabarrus
(Road,Cc=r.unity or Subdivision and Lot No.)
OWNER; Mineral Research s ppy
_ Quadrangle ilo. Harri
DRILLTKG LOG
No .
ADDRESS Concord. N.C.
TOPOGSAPHV: draw galley)slope.hilltop,flat(circle one!
USE OF WELL: observation DATE; 7/16/81
DOES TSIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? no
n c*.- (Auger)
TOTAi DEPTH: 13.5ft-RlG TYPE OS METHOD;_ Rot a rV
DEPTH
FHOM TO
0 ft-2.S ff.
__FORXA?ION DESC3IPT
Reddish brown clavev
Silt
2.5ft-3.s ft.
3.5ft-5.5 ft.
FOKHATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES
CASING: Depth
5.5ft- 11 ft.
Inside Wall thicx. lype
Dia. or weight/ft.
moisture.
rroc-2 .Otol3 .5ft 4in. Schedule 40 PVC
10.
11.
GROUT: Depth Material Method
From 4 . 5 to6 .5 ft Quikrete Premix S tamp
SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type t Opening
Froa 8.0 to!3.5ft 4in. No. IQf.Qlin.^
.., hit rock (no rock or
11 ft- 12 ft. clav being .brought ur
12 ft-13.5ft.still hitting rock,
it. brown c?],ay being_
brought up.
BOH at auger refusal.
Ir aoiicional space is neecec,use oacx or 10:
LOCATION SKETCH
(Shov distance ra au=bered roacis, or other sap reference sol=
3
i
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From 6 . 5 tol3 . 5ft Coarse clean sand
13. WATER IQKES (depth) ; W.L. 9ft. bfftnw
surface after drilling
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL: _ ft'belowtop °f
Casing is _ ft. above land surface ELEV:
IS. YIELD (gpa) :_
METHOD OF TESTING:
16. PCMPING WATER LEVEL:
*£ter hours at
ft.
gpn.
17. CHLORTNATION: Type_
18. WATE'S
Amount
TEMPERATURE( F)
19. PERMAiTCNT ?U>i?: Date Installed
Type Capacity
Hake
IntaXe OeptJi
Airli.-.e Ce?c.l_
20. HAS THE O7.~?. 3iiN PRCVICEO A COPY OF THIS SZCCR3 AMD IKf
RECC."-«'-r:cAT;c;:s? ves __ _
fCSMSS
21. KEXV=?.S Info, on item 14 and location sketch *n be
rr.ished bv ovr.<*»•
I do heresy certify -ha: this well was constr-jeted in 4cc
sicr.s and Sttr.daria »nd that this well reccrc is :r
3rci.-.
-e a.-.
s with
exact
S.C. -ell Construction
-------
3
C
3
3
3
I
1
1
1
°.0. SOX 77687 - 3ALEK.H, S.C. 77611
aaiLirxc ccr.TPAcroR Subsurface Investig.£?ATCRE (°F)_
! \ 19. PE?->'JC."ENT PCMP: Date Installed
Type Capacity_ (SP=> «?_
"1 Make _Intaice Oept.1!
Airline Septh
{ 20. '-\S THE CVT.TH BEEN" ?SOVICED A CCPlf OF THIS KZCCfS AI.'D INFCS-^D OF THE TEPAJITXESTS REQUIKEXENTS V.'b11
•r
21. ?X.XA=:-:S Info, on item 14 and location sketch to be furnished by owner.
I do heresy certify that this well was constructed in accer=i.-.=e with S.C. Well Construction
SeTjiaticr-.s ar.i Standards and that this well record is true a.-.d exact. —
-------
J
1
r
•*
.•.:: 6.;C'.:;
P.O. BOX :7687 - HALEIOH, N.C. 2761:
?.n.L:r:s co:~rj..croR Subsurface Tnvogfi^ REG. NO. WELL COKST.TJ
ION
1. WELL LOCATIC:;: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: ConrnrH . M r
_County:_
Cabarrus
2.
3.
(Road.Coer=unity or Subdivision and Lot No.)
R. Mineral Resp^rr-h c n0w0^r.0,,
Concord
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw .^aille^, slope, hilltop, flat (circle one)
5. USE OF WELL; observation DATE: -j/
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL?
.Quadrangle No. Harrisburq, N.C.
DRILLING LOG Well No. 3
ON DESC.1I?T.
DEPTH
PROS:
- £ *•*• Lt. brown, sandv loa
7. TOTAL DEPT3; 17.5ff^RIC TYPE OR METHOD:
8. FOP.MATION SAM?LSS COLLECTED: YES NO
9. CASING:
(aucer)
6ft. -14 ft.
brn^,
loaro - clodding
Depth
From-3 .Oto 17.5ft 4in.
Inside Wall thick.. type
Dia. or weight/ft.
14ft. -17.S-ft. Lt. brown, can^,, ,0=.
loam - large chunks
17.5ft.
Rock
_BOH at auoer
10. GROOT: Depth Material
From. 7 .5 eo 9 . 5 ft
Method
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia.
From 12 . Cfco 17 . Sf t 4_j j^
Type 4 Opening
No_inf m in
.tional space is neecea. use oacx or roi
LOCATION SKETCH
dts;j=ee to nu=bcred roads, or other =jp reftre
12. GRAVEL: Depth sue
rron_9J5 to!7.5ft Coarse
Material
13. HATER ZONZS (depth) ; W.L. 15.S ff
ground surface after drilling
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft.^^top of casing
Casing is ft. above land surface ELEV:
METHOD OF TESTING:
16. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft.
after hours at
15. YIELD (gpa) :_
opn.
17. CZLORZNATICN: Ty?e_
18. WATER QUALITY:.
Anouat
TI-XPESATURE (?)
19. PER.-.ANENT PUMP: Date Installed
Type Capacity
."-axe
Intaxe Ceoth
Airline Depth
20. HAS THE OWN"?. SEEN PROVIDED A COPY CF THIS 3ECOR3 A.VO ::;-'- = «^D OF ,«. DE?V?-^—<;
RECC.----HZN2ATICNS? ye* "
21. RzxArJvS Info, on item 14 and location sketch ;o be furnished bv owner.
I do her say certify that this veil was constructed in accrrca.-.ce with N.C. Well Canst-uc- • on
Regulations and Standards and that this well reccri is true a--.d exact. us.. jc..on
-------
J
1
c
-4
'1
1
j
•i.
-^
I
C
».0. 30X J7637 - *
JPIIAINC CCNTP-ACTDR SubSjirf ac-P TnT7i»c-f--ig. REG. NO.
N.C. 77f.ll
WELL CON'STHUCTIOX rEltfIT f;o.
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town.- CpnCOrd, N.C.
*. TOPOGRAPHY: draw^allej^slope, hilltop, flat (circle one)
5. USE OF WELL: observation DATE.- 7/16/81
fi. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? HO
(auger)
7. TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0ft. *IC TYPE OR METHOD; rotary
8. FOFOJATION SA.MPLES COLLfCTED: YES
9. CASING: Depth
Ipside Wall thick. type
pia. or weight/ft.
-2 .QtoJ.4. Qtt 4
- PVC
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From 4. 5to 6. 5ft Qulkrete __ Premix S tamo
_County
(Road.Conaiunity or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER; Mineral Research S Development, Inc.
3. ADDRESS: Concord. .C.
quadrangle NO. Harrisburg^ N.C.
frfal T No. 4
DEPTH
FROM TO
^FORMATION PESCP.I?".
0 ft.- 3.5ft. Orange-brown, very
sandy loam
3.5 ft.- 5 ft. Lt. brown, verv saj
loam
•5 ft. -14 ft. Lt. brown, clayey,
sandy loam - large
_ chunks -
BOH at auger refusal
11. SCREEN: Depth Dja. Type 6 Opening
From 8 .0 to 13 ._gt 4 in. _ No. 10 f. 01 in.)
it aaaicional space is neeaec, use bacic ai 10:
LOCATION SKETCH
(SV.cv distance co ourbered roads, of other saa reference sole
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From 6.5 to 13 . 5ft Coarse Gravel and sand
C
13. WATZR 20XSS ( depth 1 ;
. 6 ft. belOW
ground surface after drilling
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL; _ ft'bcloutOp °* casi°9
Casing is £t. abov^ land surzace
15. YIELD(gpm): METHOD OF TESTIHG:_
IS. PUMPING WATER LEVEL;
after __ hdurs at
ft.
17. CELORINATION: Type_
18. MATER QOAZ.ITY:
Aoounr
TSMPERATURE ID
19. PERMWJE.'JT PUMP: Date In«talled_
Type Capacity (gp=l &_
Make ^Intike Depth
Airline Depth
20. HAS THE CV^rER 3EE:! ??.OV-t2ED A COPY OF THIS
-E:^ATIC::S? ves __ .
A.V3 IKroWtTO Or THE CE?AJIT:-^NTS
Ai.TJ
21. RSMA.'.ts Info, on item 14 and location skerch to be furnished by owner.
I io heresy certify that this well was constructed in accordar.ee with N.C. Well Construction
Reculaticr.s and Stzr.iiris. and that this well rec=rd is tr-je and exact.
-------
c
I
WELL lECO'.D OIVi;ii;-::::V-"'r ".. I = ".••!. NT AL .-4-»
».0. SGX 27637 - *AI
3RIL1ING CONTRACTOR Subsurface Trurggt- i rr >-EC. >!O.
I76U -. .. :-.•„ •
JELL CO::;T.~UCTIOS- ?CP.".IT'NO.
1. WELL LOCATIC3: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Tr^n; Concord. N.C.
(Road,Coir..Tmnity or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. owKER; Mineral Research S Development. Inc.
3. ADDRESS: Concord, N.C.
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw.(valleyjslope,hilltop,flat(circle one)
5. USE OF WELL; observation DATE; 7/16/81
«. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? "O .
(auger)
7. TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0ft. RIG TYPE OR METHOD; rotary
8. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES
"9. CASING: Depth
NO
Inside Wall thick. type
Dia. or weight/ft.
rsom~l.5tol4.0f. 4 in. Schedule 40 - PVC
_County: Cabarrus -- • •_ _
_0uadrangle No. Harrj-sbura . ___ '-' ,_C_
Well NO. 5
DEPTH
FROMTO
Oft. - 5ft.
Reddish . brown , sar
loam
5ft. - 14ft. " Et. brown, sandy,
clavev loain - iarc
cnunxs
BOH at auger reftftal
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From 0 to ?. oft Quikrete _ Premix S tajnp
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia.
From 8. 5to 14.Oit 4 in.
Type & Opening
No. 10(.01 in.)
it aocicional space is owaea, use o\c-.x o>. ;or
LOCATION- SKETCH
(Shov dtscioee to numbered roada. or oth«r =ao re
J
j
j
12.
13.
14.
IS.
16.
17.
18.
19.
GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
rron 2 .Otol4 .Oft Coarse Clean sand 5
gravel
WATER 20S-ES (depth); W.L. 6 ft. below ground
surface after drilling
STATIC KATES LZVEL: ft-belowtO'P °f Casin9
Casing is ft. above lacd surface ELEV:
YIELD (gpa) : METHOD OF TESTING:
PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft.
after hours at 9P=i-
CELORINATICH: Type_
WATER QUALITY:
Amount
PERMANENT PCJiP: Date Installed
Type
Mafce
_Capacity_
(gps)HP
Intaice Depth
Airline Depth
20.
21.
HAS THE CWS-ZR Hit:; PROVIDED A COPY OF THIS RECORD AMD IMFOPJiES OF THE DEPAJ'.TXiSTS - REQUZR£« NTS
RECO."."-E::CAT:CNS? _ves
S£.XA=_-S_Info. on iteai 14 and location sketch to be furnished :by owner.
t do herisy certify that this well was cor.str-jcteci in acccrsi.-.ie with N.C. 5.'ell Construinc-r.
:ns and Scancards and that this --ell record is tr.e and exact. :
.ards and
M<77/!tU
CT CC
?r= GV-1
-------
C
WELL *EC35D
PRILLING CONTRACTOR Subsnrf af?o
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of thetlocation below)
Nearest Town: Concord. N.C ...... r--'"" _ .r~" '- ..
T_\:viT£=' 'SiCT J C'.
27611
..Jl^r 5.VjsIT?LT-I£.'i-J!EJ
(Road.Conaunity or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER: Mineral Research s Development . Sic .
3. ADDRESS:
Concord , N.C.
DEPTH
FROM TO
•DUII.I.IKG LOG Well No. 6
TOMATION DZS
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw^valle^ slope,hill«6p,.flat (circle1" one)
5. USE OF WELL: observation DAT^.-t!gXl6/BI: U 0 ft. - 1.5. ft. Reddish brown,
«. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? no Clayey loam
7. TOTAL DEPTH; 13 .5ft. *IC TYPE OR
8. FOP.1ATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES_
9. CASING: Depth
1 . 5 f t . - 3 . 5 f t . Lt. brown , silty ,
NO
type f.
'
inside Mall
Dia. or w
rroa-2.0t&13^ft_ 4 in. Schecffile J40 -
3.5 ft. - 13.5 ft. Lt. brown , sandy,
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
2.5to4.5 ft Quikrete _ Prgmix S tamp
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type & Opening
From 8..Q_to 13.S_ft 4 In. No. "JOt.^! in.'
Ir i=ai:iOnai space i:
12. GRAVEL: Depth
Size
Material
From 4.5tol3.5fr Coarse Clean sand S
gravel
13. WATER ZOXES (depth) ; w.L. 6 ft. below ground
surface after drilling
above
14. STATIC KATEH LEVEL: _ £t.faelo°top of casing
Casing is _ ft. aixave land surface ELEV: _
15. YIELD (gpn) : _ METHOD OF TESTING: _
16. POMPING WATER LEVEL: _ ft.
after ^hours at _ 9F3-
17. C5LORINATION: Type_
18. WATER QUALITY:
Amount
TLXPERATZRE (T}_
19. PERMANSMT P12O>: Date Inscalled_
Capacity_
Type
Make -
- Intake Depth
Airline Oeoch
T'.-C=.-i.D OT TTZ 2I?A.vr?TE:.TS
20. HAS THE OV«t.-?. SEE:: PROVICED A COPY 5CT"THIS^£C3?^' 7:
asccx«::=A7ic::s? yes _
21. REMAPS Info, on item 14 and: -locationv.s&e- -:h to be furnished hv cv.-r.er.
I do heresy certify -hat this wellies censti^Ci«i IM act: . -.i.-.ce
Recuiaticr.s and Standards and t-'.at -thL's Ueti--rec=r- :s ;r-e a.-.i e
S.C. Weil Cc:-.5rrjc: icr
-------
APPENDIX E
-------
r /"
i
r !
p ' [ 08/05/57
• !•
• ;PRQJ£CJ_NC., L
,,'SaURCd! 'iINi
r» n CITY: ci'JCOJi
• STATION 1,0.
, STORCT STATI
f*
r ' SAMPLE CCLLE
' SAMPLc.C^LU:
^ "jSAipCe (*EC'o
/-» " CHEMIST: GKB
!" ANALYTICAL M
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS f'.4NAGEWcVT SYSTEM
/ METALS
! DATA REPORTING SHEET
^ATrR
SAMPLE N3.: b7C16567 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDUA
RiL «:- '- DEVEL.
- STATE: NC
DM N::
CTTON; START DATE/TIME 03/U/87
CIIJ'K STQP DA.TC/T-1-1.C — il\lf'i\i'\Lil
• 0 PV^U'TTE RECEIVED FROM:
: OATE/TIMF 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
ETH30:
CASE flj.: 2363 0^'G SAMPLE NO: 0 INORG SAMP1? NO.: MOQA822
r- ' ' CONTRACT LA?OKATO^Y(0?GAHIC): EMSI/COMPU
"CJ^rRACT Lit T 'AT93 Y( INORGANIC) * CE'IT?C
, REMARK:
p k b 'A A * K. :
i" SAMPLE LQU-.V
„ i
f^. ^ ..................... ....
':::A-iVf R AO
f^ . *' J - i 3 T I M A T
f " " TH^
v. , ... . -
'" 1 ' !•' - • •. - ' •.' •:"•'„' '•** V,-f\' *',
«i-:«rt:>*4**4«******««******«*«************************
AL kfftS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETcCTcU. I nfc NUMBbK li
;iIM.-1'JK DETECTION LIMIT.
\
RESULTS
5U
~ 6U
NA
40UJ
2U
0.6U
20U
10U
15
NA
5U
33UJ
NA
NA
NA
7U
NA
14U
NA
0.2U
?700
64
16
11
2.7
7.9
1.2
,- «
IAL . , ,',-'
vW.:*«*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS ELEMENT
UG/L SILVER -4
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
.. UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L"
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
.-•..-.-',
;•, •
ARicNH, • ,
BORON ' . ... '..,; • ;••...• . . ,
BARIUM - ' •- l .'--/I "•••
BERYLLIUM ' '
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY •
SELENIUM
TIN ,
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM ' , ••:..'.• .;•:,
YTTRIUM ' ....... • ^ ,
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
Al IIMTNI1M
MANGANESE . ,
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM • :,,| , . : ' •
...IRON : = ^ ~
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
'
•-. iv--:' '.:':,-^:'d^: :, ..-.-'•. •-,
' ''.; - --, • •'.. ' . J '
1 : •
I
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO,R;G iv
«=***ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
r
r
r i
| I ATrfrNS GEORGIA
f I
Od/05/37 / M=TALS
; ' DATA REPORTING SHEET
./1TER
; SAMPLE NO.: 87C1&5S2 SAMPLE TYP?: GROUNOWA
>JIOJEC_T NC,:..27-?26 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
ISOJRC:1. KINtSAL i- c. OEVEL.
CITY: CJNCGKD STATE: NC
STAriDU I.E.: hcLL.l' CDISSOLVEO METAL)
STOrfcT STATION il^:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATF/TIME 03/15/37
SAMPLi IdLLiCJIUN: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
(COLLECTED 2 Y : n °A3UE7TP RECEIVED CRDM:
SAMPLE REC'O: OATH/TIME 00/00/00 RSC'O 3Y:
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 2353 DRG SAMPLE NO: b INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA822
CONTRACT LABOR IT J? Y ( ORGAN 1C } :
CU\TRAZT LALJfcliTJR 1 (. INORGA'IIC): CENTEC
R t fti A « K :
SAMPLc- LOG--V£KI_E.ien_3!£i_UFP__. ..SAMPIF HATB VFRTFTPO RY : RKP
'•::::::.-:« EH ARK $*:;:••:=
1
,,,. • ' /; ',=.;:• _ ". '
.CA-AVERAGE VALUE SN4-N-3T ANALYZED <=N A I-INT ERFER ENC ES
*J-cSTIMATtD VALUE *N-P'?ESUnPT I VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUc IS KNOWN TO 3E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
SL-ACJLIAL V1LLJ2 IS KMawN.TD RC r.BPaTPP THAN VAtllP GIVEN 1 •.
*U-;1AT£RIAL JAS ANALYZED PQR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
The 11. MIX UK CETECTIOS LIMIT.
RESULTS
su
NA
35-*.
2U
' 0.6U
20U
19
3U
MA
5U
5U
".U
38U
flA
NA
NA
7U
14U
NA
NA
0. 2U
44U
5U
18
11
'OU
9.7
2UJ
, •' •/', •«.'>
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U3/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
• 'i-S • '
ELEMENT
SILVER J
ARSENIC ' V>
BORON ]
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM • '
"" CADMIUM
C09ALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
""MOLYBDENUM ' •' " !
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM '
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM i - '
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM , ', ,
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
j
.•". :' • • ;' • • • •-,- -
..
.
" • ''*• '-. ,'V"'- . ' ''"• ' .'• ""'" • • • n •' '..'"'' i • i'- • ' "
-------
SV-1PLF.
ANALYSIS «AN J
NT SYSTEM
iS«*ANALtTICAL RESULTS*****
DtPA-ESO.f^G IV
! ATHc 'IS GEORGIA •
/*• ' I
-> , Oa/05/37 , METALS
i ' DATA REPORTING SHEET
i . HATER
* ' SAMPLE MO.: g7Cli?77 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOUA
'•PROJECT NJ.J rT-326 OROGRtM ELEMENT: RCRA
!,.. •ijiJ^Ct: Kl.NiRAL ^: i DEVrL.
•»! CITY: CJMCGKD STATE: NC
••STATION I . 0 . : l.'fLL 2
! STO^tT ST«*;3fl '•!•.):
1 SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/8?
-SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP CATE/TIME 00/33/00
** "COLLECTED ?Y: c PI^JETTE RECEIVED FROM:
"SAMPLE *tC'£: DAT£/Tri= OC/00/00 REC'O BY:
•• 'S g A L ? U !
]" Ai\ALY TICAL r-'.ETHOC:
..CASE NJ.T236^ u^G SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA854
-> CONTRACT LA03rATT-:YC:RGANIC): CCS I/COMPU
"CONTRACT L*aO?4TJRYC INORGANIC): Cr'ITtC
M
, R c '1 A K K :
^ y E M A « K. :
•• $A*IPLE LOG VERIFIED 5 Y : HFP SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY: GKR .
. 1
\
RESULTS
5U
B
NA
200UJ
2'J
0.6U
20U
23C
12
NA
2-iU
5U
33UJ
NA
NA
MA
7U
14U
NA
82
NA
0.2U
300UJ
9
20
0.09
14
1.3
UNITS
UG/L
"' UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
" UG/L
U&/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L "
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L .
MG/L
MG/L
ELEMENT
SILVER _j
AKSbNlU "\
50RON
PARIUM '
BERYLLIUM
LADnluM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM !
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
i , t-
* : ' •.,":, • ..'-^.
SA-AVfcRAbt VALJE «WA-NOT ANALYIED *N AI-INTERFSRENCES
^ ^'j-ESTrHAT^D VALUE *N-FRESUM?T I VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
SK-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 6E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
SL-ACTL'AL VALME IS KNOWN TCI Bf GREATER THAN V4LUE GIVEN. ^.>
. « *U-riATERIAL ^AS ANALYZED FOiTBUT HOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
£> „ ThE MINIMUI* DETtCTIOH LIMIT.
V : i :=-: ! -_
1
•'
U
i*
N
M
I*
tT
10
*
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV
::::::*:>=::ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ATHENS GtCRGIt
V '
f, • 1
Oe/OS/37 / METALS
1 ' ' DATA REF3RTIMG SHEET
WATER
SAPPI.F '10.: 87Clf592 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
•PROJECT N3.: S7-3?6 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
" ci TY :"cj;.icbfo'*L' " ' " STATE: NC
•• STATIJN I.C.: .-/£!_L 2 (CISSCLVED '-lETAL)
. STQScT STAF:^ n&:
'" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIwr 03/17/87
•• SA'iPLt COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
^'COLLrCTHC iY: D rAliJrTTi; 3ECrIVED FROM:
" CHEMIST:
" ANALYTICAL MFTHT1:
..CASE n3.: 22tJ ?RG SAI'-PLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA85A
CC'JTR-CT LALC'jaTS-'Y C J^C-A'JIC):
"C.^.T^ACT L- = C^^TU--- YC INORGANIC): CENTEC
^ K c ^ A rf K :
- SAMPLc LGi VCRI^IED BY: WFP SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED =5 Y : GKS
•i' •,• v R C M A r\ K j V ••• *i"
»
RESULTS
b
110
3
0.6U
20U
260
16
Nft
24U
AU
5U
AU
33U
NA
NA
N4
7U
20UJ
NA
110
NA
0.2U
AAU
8
A3
23
.02U
16
2UJ
UNITS
ur,/L
UU/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U(,/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ELEMENT
SILVER J
BORON
OARIUM . '
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MULYBUbNUM
NICKF.L
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SbLtNIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
1 I TAN1UM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
]• . . ,
;„ !::A-AvckAG:: VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED *MAI-INTERFERENCES
*J-5STIMATrc VALUE *N-PRE SUHPT I VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTU6L VALUE IS KNOWN TC BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•1 SL-ACT1IAL VALJ= IS KNOWN TO BE GRATER THAN VALUE GIVEN ,
,1 *U-.v,ATbPIAL *'AS ANALYZED FOR 5UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
., j THi i1lNl'-!UM DETECTION LIMIT. -^ ,
\J •'•"' ;
j,
• :,
•N
w
M
M
^
-------
SI
•ilWII NGI1D313C .i:A«-B* •'
:,:.::.= >. ILMCC^VW -
"
i:«
.-;: * :> s n j; 9 N 3 a * ;:= z ' *
wniao!
wnioico
3S3NJ9NWW
WniQVNVA
wnmsrii
VjniNVJt H
wni ami ji
wniiNoais
Nil
WniN313S
ANOWI1NV
_QV31
wniKCdHD
IHSOD
wniavs
NCaOa
f • S3A1IS
1N3W313
v
T/3W
66
1/3W Z'S
~l/9rf 09Z
1/3W 0?5
i/on OOOE?
•i/ori
i/on
i/on o
i/on
i/on
1/SP.
i/ an
i/ or.
i/on
i/an
i/on
i/on
I/on
i/ in
i/on
i/on
i/on
I/on
I/on
i/on
siiNn s
V :>!>>;:«*
nz-o
VN
OOCJLZ
c'c
VN
VN
rnse
ns
ozz
BN
St
noi
OSl
05E
nz
oocz
VN
9
SbiD JAB Q3IdIs3A VltfQ aldMVS dJH SA5 QildlUJA Mt 1 JldXSS
: N i v w a s ' 1 -*
:>iVk:;« • j
•• i
331 N 3D !C3IKfi'ju^I)A^LI^.:L ^fl l.'^jll.'CJ l(!
SZ8VOQW :'ON 31dW«S SaCriI° "O :CH JTdrt*1^ Ci^ f?fz t'Cf! 9S'O"i
'1
: '.! T' i v 5 s ..
!ft'5s= OSAIrDS^ 311rnC'td 0 :^9 0 = 10?llCj,i'«^
1 •• 1
00/00/00 3KI1/31V3 dCiS | NC 1 1 2 jTlC? PTdV.'VS..
q • -^ .. j
' " J
va" •1""-1a 1"""d "Ei5 • -fc"3™:;€
B^QNnoao :5dAi 3.d«s s,,,!^ ,-ON 3io,,: f; ,
laSHSONlloOdjaBlBQ ( 1
SlVIrr. | i6/SO/PO ^ >-
; > '
»:'jS-03CSf'3MHt f
AI-3-i1'a$?-vd3 lv*
W31SAS 1N3W3?»N»H SISA1VNB QNB 21d«fS }
J ^
-------
SAMPLE ANO SNALYSIS '-;flN AGEH ?MT SYSTEM
EPft-£SC,R?G [V
****!SANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
J
•*>
»
•
*
-
•s
»
»
• v. '
' 08/05/37 /
'! SS'-'L
• PROJECT NO. :. J.7r72s ..
1' :ITY : Lii JNC^.C"
•• 5TUIJM I.'j. : :;;L'. 3 <
. S T J R E T STATION t, : :
"SAMPLE CCLLcCrrOM: STA
•• SAi'.pLc.CKLLiCTin: S.T:
'COLLECTED iY: D =>4J'JrT
"CAMPLE iJtc'o: D^TE/TIX
" CHEMIST:
" ANALYTICAL ."ETH10:
.. CASr KJ.: 2j6j J •? G S ft
CONTRACT L»SG-,ATiJYC"^
"CJ.UR-C: L;;j<^T^rcn
**
„ R c M 4 R n :
P. c M A R K :
' SAMPlc.LOG^ VER.IF.I;0 °Y
*=:=*< EH AT i
:;l
ATHENS GEORGIA
MFTALS
DATA RfOTRTIMG SHFET
u a r ; s
t "1C.: £7Cli!i? SAMPLC TYP5: GR3UNDWA
PRDGRAV "LEVFNT: RCRA
EVcL.
STAT?: NC
riSSTLVED '"cTAL)
?T D2T?/TI^F 03/16/?7
P DATE/TIME 00/00/CO
T£ Rcc=ivEr ?R^M:
E oo/oo/oo ?EC'D BY:
VPL; (JO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA825
rSRGiVIC): CEMTEC
: W=P SSI1PLE DATA VERIFIED BY: GK3
-
RESULTS
10UJ
6LT
MA
290
2UJ
240
170
U
NA
230
220
5U
4U
?eu
NA
NA
7U
20UJ
NA
25000"
NA
0. 2U
P5
" 39000~
530
280
.10
110
4UJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
^JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
US/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
VG/L
MS/L
MG/L
MP/L
ELEMENT
SILVER V
ARSENIC \
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELrNIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
' ZINC ' ' '
ZI?CONIUM
M = R C U R Y
ALUMINUM
MANGANSSc !
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM '
POTASSIUM
1
'. .'. .', .'. .', .'. ,'. .'. ,'j ^f ft jl, .1. A J. S. J. J, j', .', .', J, .1, J. ^f
*'J-tSTix4rFO vfiuDe «N-F»'ESUMPTIV; EVIDENCE 5c PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
J?K-iCTUAL VAU'j; IS KN3UN TO 65 LCSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
SL-ACruAL, vtLUi_IS.nHgwiJ_Tg^?TGREAT£?_.THAN,VAAUE,6IVFN
NU n"—P
*U-f-;ATfcRIAL -JAS ANALYZED
THb Mlii!/UM OETECTION LIMIT.
>n TOE TgCT ED. THE
R IS
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MAN2GEKEPJT SYSTEM
>«=*AN«LYTICAL RESULTS*****
ATHENS S r 5 N 3 1 A
. OB/05/&7 / METALS
DATA RCPa^TIHG SHEET
, HATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16571; SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
* ;
•PROJECT NO.: *7-32fi PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
. , SOURCE: MITRAL JE (. DSVcL.
^CITY: cj'icoKi; STATE: NC
'• 'STATION i.n. : WELL <;
.. STDKET 3T«TI3N NO:
;" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
• ••SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME co/oo/oo
:":COLLECT-:D IJY: D PA^UETTE RECEIVED ^ROM:
"SAMPLE REC'j: OATE/riKf 00/00/00 ^r'C'O 6Y:
" ChEKIST: GK8
:" ANALYTICAL METhOO:
'., CASE »i3.: 235JA 0^"= SAMPLE NO: Or I'JORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA852
".CJMT'JCT LA?0"-. iTT^YC 1 1\ ORGANIC): CENTEC
:, rtt^A^K ;
•• SAMPI F i nr, Vi?TFTFn IY: WFP SAMPI = HATA VFSIFTED 9Y: GKS
P'SULTS
6U
NA
200UJ
2U
67
10U
3
N4
24U
5U
3JUJ.
NA
NJ
NA
7U
23
NA
13000
NA
0.2U
500UJ
5900
610
160
0.06
120
4.0
UNITS
UG/L
-TJG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U5/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
' UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
_M/L
MG/L
MG/L
ELEMENT
SILVER J
AKScNIt " <
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
" CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
~ MOLYBDENUM ' " " ' ' — '
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM /
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANFSE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
I • :rft:-"- • •
• ;': ;': "*J *• '^ Q T f'J u T fc f ': -': • : *
«M-AVEKA'i£ VALUE SNA-HOT ANALYZED SNA I-INTERFERENCES
*'J-cSTIMATEO VALUE *N-PR£SUMPTI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALU= IS KNOWN TO SE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
*i-irniAL V^L^IP T<; Kwnuw in BF T-BFATFR THAN VALUE GIVEN . ....
; J
-: "• • '
J.p:=u-
'JAS ANALYZED F3R 3UT NOT DETECTED.
THc MINI'1U,X DETECTION LIMIT.
THE NUMBER IS
V.
-------
1
••,' .
'
>
wnissviod
wnioos
_Noai
3S3NV9NVW
wniNooaiz
DNIZ
WniOVNJA
wnmvMi
wniNvm
wniamiai
_NI1
ANOWI1NV
QD31
13XOIN
wriN30flA10W
daddOD
toniWGSD
wnmAa-js
Noaos
1N3M313
«>j*si«snns3a IVOIIAIVN
1/9W
1/9W
"I/9W
1/9W
1/9W
T/90
n/gn
n/9n
V9fl
n/sn
n/9n
i/gn
n/5n
i/sn
i/gn
i/sn
i/on
T/9R
i/9n
T/gn
i/an
i/9n
i/gn
i/9n
n/9n
S1INH
' "llnin NOIlj313G rinkltJll-! ^Hl
SI aaSWON 3H1 '0310 = 130 ION lOu aOd C3ZA1VNV SCf TV I S3 IVU-n*
. NJAl'J JII1IA NtfHl aJUMB'J d8 Ui'N'.CJNJI S 1' afl 17 A ' irni01T-T7 '.
N3AI9 301VA NVH1 SSJT 39 Oi^NflCH^ SI^sfiTVA I5nj0«-^l«
S3DN3a3ja3iNi-i»N:;: ciziivNe ICN-JH*' SHIVA 99r«;Af-v:::'
•^7,1D.JICC«»* .
i "
«=•-•* ? v » r w 3 s ***• '
: > ? t »! ? !i ••
031NI-D !CDINV9aUM13A))ClvJ-Ot:l7n it>V>ilMOD
I'V nd'«C3/IS/J3 :C3Ili!7'1i!C)AiCifLC::n 'O'blNOT'"
O'l ES6VOGW :'ON 3TdW»S SbONI 0 :Cf» 3TdkJVS CfcC r 7 e J I'Ct', sS^j '
ECO
0£9 "" "^xo riSIWSHD
0009
rnooz :r3TW3s-.
n?*o :AS o.33a cc/co/cc swu/iita :o,oss ndv«w?
coott '^ d U'A d 2fl "iir 'd J 'Aq Ci-IDi"l"1c:i .
*N 00/00/00 Ji-)Ii/ = lVO dCIS !KCIlj"TlCT 3TJWV5 -
ZZ I3/il/£0 3if.il/31VQ laVlS :i-.CIJO?nC? 3TdW«S
VN :nf: ^''"IJ.^ri5 i^^cis
BN -.
snnssa ?i9>-Dii> S;-I = HI?
AT ?;a'cs;-«a2 !
i
j
J
J
1
•
•
^
o
^
J
0
*>
-
-------
•N
•S
»
»
!
•»j
^
I
«. |
b*
••%
\
»
i
'
r
'.S
f /
OS/05/37
.4 S'uU^C- : !• I'lb
., CITY : ;ONC3%
ST4TI3 i : .r.
sTjRiT STI.TI
' SAKPL: COLLE
•• SAMPLE C:LL:
S 4 '-I P L ; ^ = C ' L
• ic4L:o: . .
" CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL K
„ CASc M3.: 22
CONTRACT LA::
CJNTRACT Lii
., ': c "1 J 3 H :
K E '-1 A •< K. :
SAMPLu LOG V
*:.:*R£y.tRK j**
•
s'J-ESTIfUT
^ =?K-ACTUAL
«| *U-'1ATERI
The
ki. '
SIMPLE ANO ANALYSIS f 4i,»G = * FNT SYSTEM
E P A - £ S J' . f E C- IV
ATnj'.' GEORGIO
' DATA 'EPO^TING SH5ET
•J f, T E *
SS-'PLE N3.: =701*590 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
-"•AL •<: £, DEVEL.
: STATE: NC
: ,1 = 1 L t. tCISSOLVED Mr T4L)
CTION: START DATF/TIME 03/17/87
r.ri2n: ^T^P DAT^/TIME oo/oo/oo
: ru T f / T i ;i :• "oo/oo/oo" REC:C BY:
ETH;D:
cJ J^'3 SAMPLr NO: 0 INQRG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA352
:r.'.»TJ'Y( J:-T,;«IICJ:
3-
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
"\
ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ELEMENT
SILVER J
ARSENIC ~ ">
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHR3HIUH
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
•">
-------
r
r •
i
* t
i
t
^ i
/
\
, OB/05/37
,
• PkOJcCl_;io.:
. S3U }Ci: r,i-t_
CIT»: rj.'iCC!*
" STATION l.Z.
. ST^cT iTATI
" SAMPLE C3LLC
" SAMPL£_ CjLLi
CHEMIST:
" ANALYTICAL ?*
1; C3NTR1 1 LA[
R£.'1A-«.
SAMPLE LiG V
:A'i?L" A'iD ANALYSIS MANAGEr'-NT SYSTEM
»TH = riS"'r,EORC-iA
/ ,'".5TALS
DATA nPS'TING SHEET
SA,.',fLE ^40.: &7C16591 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
.^7-J2i P£O.G-F!AII .-LEM^MT; RCRA
• - L ^ •_ i. CEV^L.
11 S T A T c " NC
CTICM: START DATC/TI"E 03/17/87
criui\i: sjo^ c.ULEy_iine .00/00/00
: OAT^/TiriF 00/00/00" "" ?,?C:D BY:
f T-JD:
f j ^ B v 5 SAf'PLF^N'O: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA353
]-:^;O^YC ivTRCAIJIC) : CtNTEC
ZAIF T p H _3 Y-l— HJLE Si£.OL£_DA_TA_YEH IFIED BY: GKB
\
RESULTS
_7UJ
6U
190
2UJ
§3
11
10
MA
34
5u
60UJ
NA
IU
II A
7U
20UJ
16000
'1A
0.2U
52
700
130
.02U
5UJ
UNITS
UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
... UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
1G/L
MG/L
•>
^ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ELEMENT
SILVER j
ARSENIC ~~~~~~ ^
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM ' '
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM " '
HICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
I
•I'SSREr", IS K.S ::::.-::
" i • ' ' '•
*'J-ESTIKitf
=.= K-iCTUAL
" rut
......................... ....,.,.,,.,
.. ... ...
c VAL'J- :;:NA-NDT ANALYZED *NA I-INT ERFER EMC ES
EC' VALUE SN-PRESUMFTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE 0>= MATERIAL
V«LU£ IS KNOWN TO 3E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
»yUrVf-ffr!t^9^^-i37r2£-£R£AI£f THAN..V.ALUE GIVEN
AL JAS ANALYZED =OR 8UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
i
N
M
If
-------
AND ANALYSIS PANAifMENT SYSTEM
IV
RESULTS*****
ATHENS 0 S 0 » 3 I A
v \
•s ' CH/C5/.J7 '
: ' ' DATA RE'J-'TTMG SHEET
'A 4 T E R
1 • '
' ' Si-»Lt N:.: ;^cic57n SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
•'•
% i,' CITY : "c j-JCCrt:" " * STAT-:: nc
s T a T T : i i — : \, • • L. *
STCi<;7 aTATirj '40:
"SAMPLE COLLECT: j.-»: START OATE/TI",: 03/17/37
" SJWPLc CZLLtlTI j\': STTO DATE/TIME 00/DO/OO
: S A v P L 5 r^JC'u: ?4T=/Tii-lr'"CO/00/00" ' k P C ' 0 PY:
'," A;JA'L'» IICAL I"::TMJD:
i
•.. CrtSt N;.: :BOJ j-:c. SA-PLE NO: D INO»G SAMPLE NC.: MDQA827
i"C;mRAC7 LA^J'; W:^ YCNGSGiNIC) : CtNTEC"1"
1 **
"• f ff rt = H 4 ? K :
- *AMPI P IH.; vrjTrTFO RY; UFP i
i *' ' i i - - - .....
i .
RESULTS
5U
6U
NA
450
•a
6.1
20U
10U
20
NA
24U
300U
4U
38'JJ
NA
NA
7U
20
320
NA
0.2U
700LIJ
4000
2200
300
0.48
160
7. 6
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
'JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L;
iJG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
,VG/L
ELEMFNT
SILVER
ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
"ERYLLIUM
CADMIUM '
CO?ALT
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MA'JGANDSE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IR3N
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
•'
J
1
!
~\
:P
E VALJ5 «Nt-MOT ANALYZES *NAI-INTERFERENCES
=::'j-:sT:t'irEc V-LUE ^N-FPESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-AC7UAL ViLU; IS KNOrt'N T3 s: LESS THA'I VALUE GIVEN
-vL-ACTLlAI vaiuc IS ICM^UM T,T *p_r,B?nf_o THAM VALUg GIVFN
*U-UTfcV;AL V445 ANALYZED FOR BUT N3T DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
Th= XINI'-IU". TETECTION LIMIT.
-------
»•*
1
>
»
•»
*s
i
t
»
•» i
r
\
s ,
Od/05/J7
• P.ROJcCT _NC. :
S J J ? C i : Ml';;
ciTr: Cj:jco*
s T A r : o N i . : .
" SAMPLE COLL;
" SAHPL- CCLLE.
C3LL5CT^2 i: Y
S--IFL; K;C'L
• SE4L.Q :
' Cn=«IST:
"ANALYTICAL M
..CASE jj.: 21
CO.'iTKACr LA^
' C 3 J T R A C T L ; -•
M
. > £. 'i A ^ n :
R t M M ? n. :
1 iAMFLd L3o V
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS ['« N A G^'-l ?,-JT SYSTEM
ATH!:.\iStiL6Kr, : A
,' M?TALS
DATA REPUTING SHEET
W A T ? R
i^v.pLt \'0.: ?,7C165S? SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
37-224 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
u STATE: NC
: I£LL 5 (DISSOLVED METAL)
CTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
CTIJN: STOP CATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
• _ -'A^U^iTr -^EC^IVEP r^Ofl.
: DAT:/TI''i: 00/00/00 PEC'P 3Y:
^TH JO:
,
11
to
•0
II
2r
^
•*>
^>
^
•^
^
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ES'JtREG IV
ATHENS 3t3RC:A
e V. 1
, 08/05/87 / M?TUS
' DATA REPORTING SHEET
• ... WATER
S4!-'PLE NO.: J7C16569 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
• PROJECT HO.: fi7-V?£ PROGRAM EL?M=NT: RCRA
« 'SUU^C!:: I'lNL'^L '-I.- (. OEV-L.
,..;CITY: co-jcoric STATE: NC
'•'STATION i .:,. : ,J;LL i
•. STS-iCT STATION NO:
" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/37
•• SAMPI f r-i i -I-TT.IN: «rnp naTc/riME oQ/oo/no
' COLLcCTEO iY: 3 PAQUiTTE DECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLi i< = C'C: DATc/TI'15 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
•• <; - i i - n :
" CHEMIST: GKE.
" ANALYTICAL METHOD:
., CASc N3.: 2263 0^5 SAMPLE NO: D ' * ' '
. li- •
t
N
t
/
/
-------
.,*.:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
G IV
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
1 : ATHENS GEORGIA R
OS/05/37 ,' METALS ' •
OATS REPORTING SHEET
SAMPLE NO.: 37C16534 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
»
• PROJECT. HO. : s7-i26 PROSO.AM FLE^EHT: RCRA
.. SuU3C£ : M Jr'lL U £ DEVfcL.
'„ CiTY : CONCORO STAT': NC
'••'STATION i.i>.: V^UL 6 CALSSOLVED V?TAL)
STO* = T STATICS .'12:
" SAMPLE CCLLECTI'JN: START DATE/TIME 03/17/37
" SAMPLE CCLLhCTI'JM: STOP CITE/TIME 00/00/00
l" 'COLLECT:!! t;Y! :• PA'.UETTE RECSIVET =KOM:
"SAMPLE REC'L-: DATE/TI.IE oo/oo/oo s^c'o BY:
CHEMIST:
' ANALYTICAL KEThjO:
, CA35 ,M3.: :3->3 a.? 3 SAMPLE 'iO: 0 IMORG SAMPLE NO.: MD'3A326
„ CONTRACT LAe^ATC^YCSRGANIC):
» s E H ft R N j
" SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED) BY: UFP SA.MPL? DAIJL_VE_S I FI ED BY: GK3
:::=::••::« EM ARK $=:-•::::•:
^1
:! • •
- •
:.! if if if :'f if :.! if :.: if if if if .'f -"fsffifts if if if if if if if if if if if if if i: if if if if if i: if if if if if if if if ifififififffffif & if if if if if if if if
• 'l-i'l'FQjTIICTES*-*
SA-AVEKl AGt VALUE SNA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INT£RFERENCE5
S'J-cSTl;UT£'j VALUE *N-FRESUMPTI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• *K-ACTUAL VALU; IS KNQ^'I TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
*\ *L-*C.TUAL_V:ALU=... is KNOWN jo Bf GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •
.[ =:=J-MATEf:lAL WAS ANALYZED FOR 3UT NOT OETECT^D. THE NUMBER IS
Th£ ,V.T:JTVIUM DETECTION LIMIT.
rSULTS
20UJ
6U
NA
320
0.4U
81
10U
16
NA
24U
4U
5U
4U
38U
NA
NA
NA
7U
30UJ
NA
45
NA
0.2U
17000
940
160
0.02
loO
3UJ
UNITS
UG/L
"'UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
" UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
"MG/L
MG/L
ELEMENT
SILVER J
AKitNlI, . ,_ _^
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
' LAUM1UM
COPALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY . '
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
"TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM . • -
YTTRIUM
" Z1ML '
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
~" MANGANtSt ' '
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
, .
1 '. !
§
•
•'•
''.
M
14
M
M
M
JI
^
»
••
"
:
-
M
M
•v
-------
"
t
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SfA-SSC'.REG IV
! ATHENS GEORGIA
'-V '
f- '
03/05/E7 / ••'.-TALS
' DAT! 7EP3RTING SHEET
KATE*
. i
SA.-.SLE NO.: e7:i657P :A«PLE TYPE: GRCUNDWA
, ;
•PROJECT NO.: e7-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
,. ISOUkCc: MI'lrRnL R= t. C)cV;L.
, CITY: CONCSND STATE: NC
- STiTI }.
*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ELEMENT
SILVER j
A K S b N I (. ' - <,
3APIUM
BERYLLIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
ntLJSUCNUn '
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM ~
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TI T ANIUM " '
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE '
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM "-
POTASSIUM
"1 " ' - '" • "" •
1 i
i • - .
H
»
m
r
*n
It
"V
-------
, OB/05/S7
* i
«
• PROJECT %' 3 . :
;" ci rr^c: jikoi;
,«'$TAT:O-J i.o.
i " SAMPLE CCLLI
• SAMPLE. COLLc
'• t
:coLLecr;o ~r
"'SA'IPLi KEC':
'• S£dLLO: _ .
" CH6MST:
" ANALYTICAL K
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MA^AGEI-.?NT SYSTEM
EPA-£SO , R<:C- IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
,' MjTALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
iUffH
SAMPLE NC.: S7Cli593 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
37-326 PROGRAM ELEHENJ: RCR4
"! AL R; t QEVEL.
D STATE: NC
: vr-LL. 6u (DISSCLVJO METAl,)
"N U3:
CT:O:J: START DATE/TIME 03/18/87
rrr^N: ST^F DAT<=/TI".E oo/oo/oo
: D BA-JIJ?TTE RfCEIVE^ FROM:
: CATC/TT'E 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
ETHJ::
U'CA$£ ND.: 2jfJ T.RG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA8S5
•CONTRACT LA.-. 3^;n«Y(ORGA«IC>:
.CGJTRACT LAhJ^TSarCINORbi-'JIC): CENTEC
M
„ REMARk:
. .<« E M ft «<, :
>• SAMPLE L 3 >7 ^
M
t
ci?!FTcfi BY: VJFP >;AMPI F RATA VFRIFIFH RY: GKR
RESULTS
?UJ
6U
NA
990
A
" c fll
~ • Q J
20U
21
MA
51
220
60'J
50UJ
na
NA
7U
30UJ
29
NA
0. 2U
133
3100
2300
340
.02U
3^,0
12
ft ft ft ft ^
UNITS
'UG/L '
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ELEMENT
SILVER /
ARSENIC >
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
"" CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MCLY3DENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
I
-
„
''!• '.' ••••f'f •,*•.' •.«-.".• ,••••
* 'ftftft.-CJT.'JOTEi
ft A - i V S- R A 6
ft'j-ESTIKAT
ftK-ACTUAL
» ft 1 - i i" T ! 1 i 1
i V4LU? ftNA-NOT ANALYZES ftNA I-INTERFERENC"ES
fO VALUE ftN-f-RESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
V4LUE IS KNOWN T3 BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
i/ii nc TC irwnvi rn SF r.BFarrp THAN VALIIF r.TVFN
. ftU-I'.AURIAL -J4S ANALYZED C3R «!UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE PINI-1UM DETECTION LIMIT.
V.. . — _
,' : ',
1 —
1
'\
• «
1*
n
M
M
•V
-------
^
1
i SAMPLE AMD ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD,r?G IV
ATHENS GCORG:A
" V
f. f i
, Od/05/S7 , T'ETALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATtR
Si"PLi; NO.: 67C1S571 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•PROJECT 113.: iT-225 "ROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
,.;SJUr•
*• ' . , ,
n * ' * * ' .
" -.,.,.....,,., ....,,..,....,,....,.., s.........*..^.......^..............,...................^......^.^^!,,^.,.,.,.^.^..*
"• ^Hr3aTN3TES*44
„ :::A-AV£R Idg VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED *N A I-INTERFER ENC E S
-------
If
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EDA-ESD,K:G IV
««*#« ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
i
f, '
09/05/S7
!
1 '
• esojfci_.Nu.:
,. SJUXG; : vm~
C I T Y I ^~ j \C C ;C
" STATIC! I.?.
j.. STOrfiT ST6T1
'" SA.XPLE COLL-1
i" SAMPLI_COLLt
"'COLLECT?!) KY
' 1 S « M ? L t R 5 C ' !>
" CHEMIST:
.ANALYTICAL V
ATHENS GEORGIA
/ METALS
' DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATcR
SAMPLE NO.: 87C1558fi SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
i7-?26 P^GGP.AM ELEMENT: RCRA
KiL ^i t. DEVEL.
D STATE: NC
:._ii.2LL 1 CDISi!lLV£D ws-TALl
3'J '10:
CTI3N: STA'T DATE/TIME 03/17/87
CT.ZOM:. JJj^ DA1E/.TIME._00/00/00
: :• PAOUFTTE RECEIVED FRTM:
: DAr3/TI»tfc 00/00/30 PEC'D BY:
CT«O:
.CASE ur..: 2363 Q?G SAMPLE NO: C IMORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA846
CONTRACT LAi^ATT-'YCHGANIC):
CJ'ITR.»CT LA:-JF iT3. ' 1 " \ ' ' '
"\ *il-tSTlJlAT
vK-ACTUAL
"I i=L-ACIUiL
SU-XAKRI
C!
... [[[ ...,.J.J., ........^
t VALUE *NA-NGT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES
EB VALUE SN-PRESUMPTIVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
VALU: IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
VJLU= IS KNOWN TT B = r, s r i T e J THA^ VALUE CTVFN
AL WAS ANALYZED =OR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
-------
SAMPLE CMO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
V
i
^
§
f
/r
"
,.
•*
:
-
u
"
"*
a
f
»
•>
»
»•
•
=
V
08/05/87
i
PROJECT NC. : t.
CITY: :J-JCC,D
STATIJ'J I.C. :
SA-IPLc COLLECT
SAMPLcLCCLLiC.!
COLLECTED ur:
SA1PL: R5C'u:
SEALED:
ATHFNS GEORGIA
/ "ETALS '
DATA PEPTTING SHEET
W A T ? ?;AL
«,0«*«**«*«*««««W»««**.«*«»««««
VALUt v'IA-\'OT ANALYZED *•>! A I-INTER FERENC ES
VALUE «H-?S=SUMFTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
fiLUfc IS KNOWN TO SH LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
ALUt J5_Aiinw\' T.OJE.. GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
^AS ANALYZED FDR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER is
INI.VJW DETECTION LIMIT.
i
/ i
M
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
,' ATHENS'GEOR'CIA
1 ' OB/Oi/17 / M=TiLS
! ' : DATA REPCPTIM", SHEET
•: ;.'ATC»
SAMPLE NO.: 97C16550 SAMPLE TYPE: QCSPIKE
•PROJECT NO.: *7-3i6 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
..•sju^ct: VINL?IL *:; < CI&VEL.
M;ciTr: coNCOt.-D STATE: NC
•• STATIQM I.D.: Kl.-LL :2 PE SPIKE
i,ST3RET o T A T i J >J VJ :
;•' SAMPLE COLLECTION: START OATE/TIMF oa/16/87
,-SAMPLC COLLECTION: STOP DATC/TIMF oo/oo/oo
"'COLLECTED ty: o PA;U = TTE DECEIVED F--IOH:
" SrtVPLE ^fcC'^: SATE/TIHE 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
!•• S = ALfciJ:
' CHEMIST: GKS
" ANALYTICAL K.ETHJD:
1 1< •
-, CASE N3.: 2J6J 0^3 SAMPLE NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQAB60
. REMARK:
m «E'U«K. :
"SAMPLE L3G VcKlrIED « Y ! WFP SAMPL? DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
M
m ""
\
RESULTS
5U
NA
100%
a 2 •',
80 2
hA
120%
96%
go-:
39U
MA
flu
flA
7U
NA "
93%
NA
95%
111%
110%
0.17U
96%
94%
0. 14U
0.54U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UU/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
~UG/L —
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ELEMENT
SILVER J
A K i : N H, \
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
UAuriiun
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MLILrBUcNUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
,
» , ; - • • ' _ t ,
U ' ' - ' --."."-''.- . ! •. _ '
»
- '""-sa-TN3TH"
!::A-AVt«AGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NA 1-INT£RFERENC £S
*'J- = STII'.A FED VALUE *fl-P3E SUMPTI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
:.= K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 3? LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• :; *L-ACTUAL VALUERS KNO*M TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
vU-!xATt«IAL WAS AN ALYZED FQ
-------
1
', 08/05/87
• PROJECT NC..:
!';ClTr :~C3'icori
•• STATUS :.:•.
;.. STOR^T 3T..TI
1
.' SAMPLE COLLE
i" SAMPLt .C2LLZ.
";COLLCCT=D ^Y
" 'SiALtiD : -~- -
'CHEMIST: gko
' AN«L»TIC«L f-
u CASE U!i. :~23
inCO.'JT^ACT L A i
„ '•< E M A p K :
" SAMPLE LCi V
SA'X"LE AND ANALYSIS M ANA SEN ENT SYSTEM
Ft=i-:SD.-FA7r» THAN VALUE GIVFN •
AL «IAS AiJiLYZtO =OR BUT NOT OET£CTED. THE NUMBER IS
riI.Nr.UJM DETECTION LIMIT.
/
J
-------
9
i
»
r
*
.,
<*
t>
"
n
M
•i
i*
m
*
tt
"
V.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
iPA^ESiJjREG IV
08/05/37 , MtTALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
— '.'ATER
SAMPLE NO.: 67C16537 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PR3JECI_NC. : _:J7-J2S PROGRAM FIFMF.NT' RCRA
SOU^CC: '•' I \ i P A L •< : G DFVcL.
cifr:C-NJCCR; STATE: we
5T4TIJN I.C.:_Jj?I? J1LAM_CD1SSQLV-D METAL)
STCRtT STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME o?/n/B7
SAMPLc_i.OLL££IIi]]Ji_S-TO.P QATE/TI'-iE 00/00/00
COLLECT;:. '-Y: o P--,>U:TTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE _S;C "j: DATE/THE 00/00/00 3 = C'0 BY:
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 23-2 3RG SAMPLE NO: D INOPG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA8. f, :
R E M A v< :
SAMPLc L2G V-RI.= T?D BY! UFP ^AMPI F OATJl VFRIFIED BY: GKB
VV"'"E'J"S
\
RESULTS
_7UJ
6U
11 A
6U
O.oU
20U
12
12
NA
5U
6CUJ
NA
NA
NA
7U
14U
MA
NA
0.2U
A4U
5U
.16U
.15U
.02U
.14U
.54U
•>
ftftftftftANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS ELEMENT
UG/L 5ILVFR t
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
' UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-. UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
H&t—
MG/L
MG/L
MG/U
MG/L
MG/L
ARSENIC 'S
PORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN ,
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
'•••••
ft ft ft ft ft ft ft :•::': ft ft ft ft ft ft ft .|: •.: ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft
ftA-AVtSA'jE VALJE ftNA-NOT ANALYZED ftN AI-INTE9FFRENC ES
ftJ-ESTTMATED VALUE ftN-PRESUMPTI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
ftK-ACTUAL VCLU: IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
p iLrACTUAL VALUE IS KMQUM.TD BE GPFATfJ THAN VALUE GTVEN
*U-MATE^IAL W4S ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THg NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
1 ;
^
i
•a
M
-------
1 S»v,rLE AND IN'-LYSIS MANAGEMFNT SYSTEM
3PA-ESO.RFG IV
1 r ATHENS GEORGIA
.?"* '•
, 08/05/97 ,' MCTALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
•| WATER
| S^M'LE MO.: 87C16573 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKUA
• P_R3JCCT ND. : S7-32S PROGRAM FIEMF.NT! RCRA .
.ISOUSCE: MIUcKAL -Ji; £ DEVEL.
..(CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
"'STAriQ'l I.D.: i'AiL^R 1LANK
•. ST3* : T i TAT ION MC :
" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
•• SAMPLED COLLECTION: STJP .. DATE/TIME (LQ/00/00
" CCLLECT50 3*1 D PAQU=TTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLt 3 c C ' C : OATc/TIMF 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
" CHEMIST: &H3
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
n CASE NO.: 2353 ?RG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA350'
CONTRACT LAc.KAT J-iYORGANIC) : c.VSI/COf"PU
|CO'URACT Lfi = 3RAT'JRYCINORGANIC): CENTEC
" j
, R E ('. A R (, :
* i
" SA.'lPLc LCt_ VCRIFIF3 BY! WFP S AMP( = ft AT.L VER I FI ED 3Y: GKB
\
RESULTS
FU
6U
NA
6U
2U
0.6U
20U
10U
9
NA
2AU
•5U
<.U
40UJ
MA
HA
7U
14
NA
14U
NA
0.2U
200UJ
5U
0.16U
0.17U
0.02U
0.19
0. 54U
~s
«rJC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE "~'~
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM '
POTASSIUM
n . '
**• v'-'» '''
* 1
r* *f v •*• -f V -.! •.: V V '-.' '-.' :.! '•,' 'f * '.' '-.' -f * ********** V V V * * * * * * £ £ * * * £ * :> * * * * * ** * ft A it :|: ^: ^ !i :'i :":
1
«A-AVci'4'JF VALUE .-SNA-NOT ANALYZED *NA I-INTER'FERFNCE S
, *J-fcSTIKATEa VALUE *N-F'ESUMPTI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
.. *K-ACrUAL VALU: IS KNOWN TO 3E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
- i^*LrACJUAL_J(ALUE_IS_JUUUN_JIL_a£__GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
. VJ-ISAI CKIAL WAi ANALYiEU *0t>. BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS -
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-
fc
*
-V
1*
11
n
** **
M
• /
,*
• ^
•
1
/•
/
-------
SA'-'.PLc AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
cPA-ESB«REG IV
**:::**ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ATHENS GEORGIA
r r j
OB/05/37 , METALS
: DATA REPORTING SHEET
• _ . w'ATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16588 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
§
•'PROJECT NO.! 37-324 PR3GP.AM ELEMENT: RCRA .
.. iQi-HC;: KINc^AL RE t D^VEL.
„ CITY : CJNCOkD STATE: NC
" STATIJM I.D.: 2ATLER "LANK CDISSHLVED MFTAL5
.. STORET STATION UO:
" SAMPLE COLLiCTIO'i: START DATE/TI^E 03/17/37
" SAMPLE CSLLECTIO^: ST3P DATE/TIME 00/00/00
"COLLECTED LY: c PAOUETTE ' RECEIVED FROM:
"SAMPLE riEC'U: DAT:/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
•• 'St ALr^:
" 'CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
,. CASE n.: 2263 .KG SAMPLE NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA350
CO N TRACT LAUDATO 'YCORCANIC):
ICJ-NTSACT LALu-?ATr!0Y(INQPGANIC): CENT EC
"
„ REI-iASK :
R c Hi P N :
" SAMPI r inr, vP3T = Ten BY: UFP. ^/IMPLF DATAVFRTFTPH «Y: fiK5
-
M
r
• ' - ' i •* - , •",''''.,
"' >«'*' ' - » i ' •;-'• **i •'"'-. • ;
M ' ; - * -' .^ >' I ''**-''',
" ,!J....,..,.,.,, ,.,,..,,..,.,,. ,...,..^.^^....J.*A,.,..^........,^.J..,..,...,..)...,..,J.J..,,,.rt
-------
i
ft
r
r
r
Sh'lPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
?PA-ESOiRrC- IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
08/05/37 / METALS
/ DATA REPORTING SHEET
. WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16574 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
•PROJECT N U . : d 7 - 1 2 6 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA .
^|d TY: "C3NC3?D %" ' STATE: NC
•. ST1TTTM T.T.: CT=LD SLANK
., STORrT STATION -n :
" SAMPL- COLLECTION: START DATE/TIM; o?/i7/87
.. 5 AM PI =• f. ,11 I FC.Tnti: STrtP 31T = /TI': CEMTEC
[ ,R e i-i ASH:
- SAMPLE LOi'i VFftTFI-f ?Y! UFP SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
a . L ' .
» ,
» :': :'::': P T O T V1 T r r •': :': •':
„ ' ' *A-AV = ,viiiE' VALd'E" ' vNA-NOT ANALYZED *N AI-INTERFER EMCES
^'j-cSTIHAT'O VALU- XH-VB. ; $ UMFT I V£ EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
" • :;:*-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TC eE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
" •'' ft{ -ACTUAL VAI 'Jf IS KN3WN TO 6F GREATER THAN VALUE GIVCN •
. " «U-HATbRIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THc NINHUK DETECTION LIMIT.
V '
RESULTS
5U
NA
6U
2U
0.6U '
.?OU
10U
9
NA
4IJ
5'J
4U
33UJ
MA
NA
NA
7U
14U
NA
1-iU
NA
0.2U
200UJ
5U
0.17U
0. 17U
0.02U
0. 14U
0.54U
SSSiX. ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS ELEMENT
UG/L SILVER J
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U5/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
""UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
— UG/L~
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
AK itNlt ^\
8CRON
BARIUM
"ERYLLIUM
CCEALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MCLY'lDfcNUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
itLbNIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
1
i
1 '• '
-v
M
''J
-------
' (
D :
f. ">
•^ • , ,03/05/37
!••
•':!
• PROJECT NO. : .!7-.'.L5
,. S U J i* C i '• '•' I N fc P - L .'' ;
-» ...CITV: C31.;:;.?
. STD<£ r if ATI'JM no:
'" SAMPLE CCLLhCTIJN:
'•• S A ;1 P I C C:LL:CriJN:
~ " COLLECT;,-; 2Y: 3 ? i 'J
, " S4 ••:?(.£ R:C 'o: DATE/
-« '" CHEMIST:
j" AIJALfTICAL KETH33I
',„ CAS-: :^.: 2363 ^G
— ; CJMr^ACT LA^^ATJ.Y
"CJ'JTJUCT LA-tNATO^Y
, REMARK :
•^ m R L :-i A R .<. :
- SAMPLE LOG viR-ir^ia.
! " i
» i
_. 1
- ;
„ i' '" iA-4V:i.AO£ ' VALUE
•~ i *ll-cSTI(--iTEO VALU
"I *K-ACTUAL VALJr
• 1 _;:i -ACTUAL VALU?
LP A.'JO ANALYSTS MANtGEMENT SYSTEM
f?A-ESD , PEC- IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
_r. , ..- ... .,
/ METALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
^PLE NO.: 87C16589 SAMPLE TYPE: 9LKWA
PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
i DEVEL.
STATE: NC
rLANK CCISSOLV=0 METAL)
START DATE/TIME 03/17/97
STCP CATF/TIMF 00/00/00
UfTTE RECEIVED FROM:
Tr-IE 00/00/00 R-C'D 2Y:
SAI-'PLE MO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA351
( INORGAVIC) : CE'JTEC
bY: WFP SAMPLE Q&JA VERIFIED BY: GK8
4
r!: :|: :!: :|: it :\: :|: * ^: * :|: :!: :.': :|: if # « :!: :|: :): :;: it :;: :> # « :!= ft « ft :.': ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft
ft,MA-NOT ANALYZED ftNAI-INTERFE RENC ES
E *N-P7ESUM.PTIVE EVIOEMCE Or PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
IS KKC».N TO BE LESS T«AN VALUE GIVEN
T<; KMOW^ TH R= r,PFflT=R THAN VALIJF f.TVFN
\
RESULTS
5U
6U
MA
6U
2U
"0.6D
20U
10U
1 1
24U
5U
33U
MA
MA
NA
7U
UU
MA
25
NA
0.2U
4 _U
5U
.16U
.16U
.02U
.14U
.54U
ftftftftftANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS ELEMENT
UG/L SILVER J
UG/L
UG/L
' UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
' UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
" UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
.1 *U-;'!AT.:;?IAL .MS ANALYZED COR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
— .,| THE •'.riil.'.aH OE7ECTION LIMIT.
i
ARScNIC \
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM • •
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM ' "
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-
i
\ 1
•
M
n
N
Ji
»
a
*
M
V
-------
-------
/^•••s««t«t*«»*::i.-ij5sai*si = :.; ; - >i •
;<:• •;:•
•*«- •;:•
-j^ '.;;- -;^.
-" -:*- •;:•<-* -::-~n •;;•
i > i i n> i o -::•
j -It- »/» 3W» OOO, t»O V.(/»O ,l/>t/> u>tr. O4/1T3
' •::• i> ri.n- oor» ZT n t o '*>& — t— i •- c^x^
,«>"/• >v
'/,' ~vr _£_^ i;^L/i J^ltt f~«;r" 'll^S C_to "^t^ O " *s
, x> -D x- 1> -< -HI. r- s f- -fi~ -o -o ?j M ^: ^.<- o
i
T-i rr >*^- x-r^i. -« -« -.;- • j> .... oc >o i t— 4 •• — » *_ o •• — * ' a. '
>•- oo — *< zr -;,- ju r~ •— i — 1« o •• J».M .- oo t/1 o ' -J !
-urfcc-7- -t •:
T Joj^«T>t j.«f, •;
t, »-tr~ r~ — ic^u** •:
^ i n 1 1 • .;j %
ji f~ « o •;:• •.
» * !*•»> < ;;- •;
*•* ^i~ r~ <: j>. •;
*"* i"C c 3-*r~ •!
Xcni. m. il-O'
c c.r :
is J^;*-. »-» i n -:
oS*"1" 'i
aiP]^?t .;j
/j.
""4 ^2 Z Z -IZ-j •"-
mHoo i 21 -::•
-o.jUiij.Tj ii •::•
*~* 1 Pl^j •"•
i J ~jf — 4 —4 1/> Ql -,'f
*£ OtCJCD C ~^ •"•
-q z t •::•
r- kriu-oo -;;-
!*r o »-* T> •::•
— < jXJtTint-^ -;;•
* ^SJ^m^ %
~~4 — * < O -.J
c J .0 ^ o -:;•
ni t-m 1 -;:-
-1-41-^ -^
nix O-;H •;:•
nljxmzj -::•
~^^ ** j> ~"f
rn
a
•
—
IT
rn »—
r- -02
ltl o r r- r • o*-«o *
' • '• 1 XJjK> ^ ^'J f~f~~^«JOr'
i< 'Drily ytu C •< n-n i- • ^n •*
' -:'• in c tjo- HI .... otT (j»* ' ^ A'
*
LQ >j ,».- 1 j — i —4 — ( ..-: j o>
>-H I • i-» * i 'no»-«i-« U J~ -»J ' ' t
Tl — i— *O IIJCJ*;C_ 1 ' ' l/>
»-H LJ t j i_j o -i o a_r .i LJ ^ •*- l-*j '*
MI ^.' ,AJ *; •• r i . ^ •*•. «u ^ r J c- J i
o i -< -< t, i t x » '• i(> , » '
a- • »_so >-i-r. -H-H r- ji
•• o<.»-~
j *7 X» ^
c «»-r-
11 t* HIT
•a , *T o
'H — < |T3» <: TT1 IT! i
111 -H ^
CJ 'J^J ' t ' fJ 'U ^
1 X i*i> • O • , J>
1 ^«— n 1° f—t-4 c~» , ••
I ii ..Q 1 o irnin 1/1 .0 ! w
1 w •• X XX
O — l-l
l>1 1 O' 1 O/C HM
i* "Oil',:
3. j "iS
TJ *T »Xi
r- | -<.-.
h i ^^
fo i j
-H I O .Z
rn
JQ
n
CO
O
— » P» 'JO < 11
j> -5 | *j ' T» JS
-H ' o 'scum
o m.Ti
[Tl
• « T" r*. — »— 4j>
M 00 Z ..'Z
< 'ooJ
m ;xx
O (FT?
*> A?«£ l/>
>
o
'. J 'OH» —1 j f>
/?
tn
B
-j£
O
„
^'•o5
r i-» r~
rn 1 -<
C."1!/*
ir. jj 3
LJrnr*
Ct t^
11 XX
O3C j
' r?i , t» < "n
'o t»
in
-I
i^ o ! TJ
r-4 a?
!o rri
- . -J
;-< CD
..
n
"
OT . CJ i
O
-4.
f'J
33
O*-UJ
cc
oro C
c_
'
cccc
C
c_
r- i
rn
^
1 "D 1
i ""
I O3
x:
x»
c
cccc
c
cccc.
m
-1
-<
LO-.
— 4
rn
2
C : C
*• 5-
cccccc
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt-4 -W-
i i i i
iiii
IIII
ooor
oiai>
1 1 1 1
i "^ .»
corn r~
(-ir" -K
l/i 2 t^^>»^*^'*1*1*
\ *%
-------
'_ 06/05/37
. '
t
• PROJECT NO. :
.CITY: CONCO-I
" 1
- STATI j1; I .:.
., STJR = T STAT:
" SAMPLc COLLt
"iCCLLECTCD It
",SA'-IHLi -JEC'U
" S c A L c u :
" Chti-iIST:
* ANALYTICAL K
„ CASE N3.: 23
oA'.PLc AND ANALYSIS PftM&GECENT SYSTFN
£PA-=SC,KcG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
/
/ METALS
/ DATA 35PG-JTING SHEET
SV-;PL? N3.: 37C15';S1 SAMPLE TYPE: PUMP«5LK
27-32S PROGRAM FLEMENT: RCRA
D ' STATE: NC
: PIJVP ^.LANK (DISSOLVED METAL)
on n:
CTI3M: START DATE/TI«E 03/18/87
friQN: STOP PAIE/TI'^? 00/00/00
: D ?'-,J!JETT£ RECEIVED CRO>«:
: CAT3/TIM? 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
ETHQD:
i3 1?5 SAMPLE NO: D iMQRG SAMPL^ NO.: MDQA752
:^AT j^rcQRGA^io :
2?AT3^YCIN ORGANIC): CcNTEC
RFSULTS
7UJ
6U
NA
6U
5.6U ""'
20U
22
13
NA
290
5U
4U
50UJ
NA
MA
MA
7U
30UJ
14U
NA
C.2U
44U
EU
.21
.16U
0.02U
.29
.54U
*r, ,*. .'. .-. .*.
UNITS
UG/L
" UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L' '
UG/L
UG/L
(JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U&/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
' UG/L "
UG/L
UG/L
— H5/L
UG/L
KG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ELEMENT
SILVER J
ARScNK >
30RON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHPOMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL '
LEAD
ANTIMONY
StLENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
' I INC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
' SODIUM
POTASSIUM
i
r>
*
•
•-
••
i*
»
it
M
It
»
M
"
RcMASK. :
SAMPLfc.LOG
>AAPLJC_DA.TA_VE
:_G.K S_
* Iftftftf :|: « :|: i
J :|: :;: * * ft if $ * * * tf if * * ft * * ft
V.
ftA-AVLKAL-' VALUE :?N A-NOT~ANTUYTfb' " "§N A I- IN"TET?'FE"R E~NCE S " .
*J-cSTIf-',ATEO VALUE ftN-PRESUMPTI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-«CTUAU VAL'JE IS KNOdN TO PE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
^^RV^ifH-NTL^E^
THc MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
! . ATHFNs"'iEriRr-IA
-» '' 03/05/37 / METALS
. ' DATA SCOOTING SHEET
M A T -7 f
*:' Si-'^Lc NO.: 37C16579 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
i *
§ .
•PROJECT N2.: :7-?26.. P.RO^RAiL ELEMENT : RCRA
.. isdUi?c=: xiN,.-j:
;.. CAS: UD.: 23^3 1^3 SAI-'PLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA356
- > CONT^-CT LAbl^AT Jr' Y( TRGAMC) : ?M S I /Cdy.DU
C'JNT^^CT Lie J^iTO,Y(I'jORGANIC): CENTTC
« <
„ REMARK:
" 'SAMPLE .J.QS. v- 3.151 =_D JY; HFJ> -AHPI^JATA VERIFIED BY: GKS
M j
» '
M
,,i =::A-Avc -.«S&E VtL'J= «NA-N'nt ANALYZED ^NAT-INTERFERENCES
- . *J-:STIMATtu VaLUC *N-F 3 ESUMf T I VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUflL VALUE IS KNOWN TO ti E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• S=L-ACTUAL V&LJ5 IS KNn^N Tn ftp fi ' F ^ T F R THAN_V.ALUE GIVEN .
SU-MATCRIAL .MS ANALYZED =OR SUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER is
~ „ TnC HIIlI'-'UK DETECTION LIMIT.
V
RESULTS
6U
NA
6U
2U
0.6U
20U
10'J
eu
NA
24U
4IJ
5U
38U
N'A
MA
N'A
7J
14U
14U
MA
0.2U
130
SU
0.16U
0. 16U
0.02U
0. 14U
0 . 34 U
.•--.- ... . % , . ,--,,.
#***?. ANALYTICAL R E SULT S«=5***
UNITS ELEMENT
UG/L SILVER J,
'" UG/L "
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U&/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
'JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ARSENIC ">>
30PTN !,
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CObALT !
CO"0 CR •
^DLYBOENUM
NICKEL
LEAO
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIM
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM ..
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
j „
-
I ..
«4
••
/'
-------
•J I •-<, •
n f
S.VPLC AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
f^ ' , EPA-ESD.REG IV
' | ATHENS GEORGIA
' V '
/" / '
'• ' 1
( OS/05/3? ^U.?GEA6LE ORGANTCS ANALYSIS ' '
1 i 'J a, T " P
•:>: SJ/PLC NO.: 87C16532 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUflOWA
• K
• PRDJcfU ^0 * 37-^?6 PROGRAM EIFMFNTJ RCRA
.. .SUUrfCfc: M'URAL 1= t DEVEL.
f» ..CITY: CONCDKO STATE: NC
',, CT.^TT-. M ' n • '.IPII i fr,T<;
1, 1-DICHLCRQFTHANE
TRANS-1.2-OICHLOROETHENE
1,2-OICHLOROETHANE
ltl,l-TRICHLOROETH»NE .
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE : '
1, 2-DICHLORQPROPANE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOP3PROPENE
TRICHLTROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
RENJENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
l,li2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
2-CJJLDJ?nfJHJH VTNYI. F.THPR
3ROMOFORM
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
rni M=NF
ChLOROSENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
•: •;,-. •= • ,,/.'. ii:" - - - . •->•-, -. :•!; ' '•
— . i ' f: • •: -•• ••: :: ^: ••;.••:::'::• ft :': :'• .': •': :': :': rt ^: * * * * * * * * •.;= * ft ••• •'.- * * S * * * :!= * * * * ******* * * * * * ft * ft * ft
,. " " ~!-:A-iiM"aG= VJL'J' *NA-NOT ANALYZED ftNAI-INTgRFERENCES
/^ ft'J- •-'TIMATPD VKLU5 ftN-PR = SUNPT1 VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
' " ft^^lCTUAL'VALU; IS KN3HN TO EE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• •'
-------
o
/:->-
•
03/05/37
S 4 f P L £ AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
f OA-ESO.rfC- IV
A THE MS 'jMRfIA
:=*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS
i
PU'G
UG/
ijG
GRGAMICS ANALYSIS
'
I
SIM Pit: r.'3.: S7C165S2
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOtfA
• P^QJ£CT..IJJ. :_£7_-?2A PROGRAM gLEfENT: RCRA
.. i J J •< C L : '•': fi t R < L <: c o E v - L .
., CITYlCj.'iCJrC S T A T "i : N C
•'STATIC:, I.•;•.:_ vTL:. 2 CXLSSTL VIS v-TAL)
•iTCSiT ST.i7.ijNi UJ:
'SAMPLc CCLLfCTI'JM: START OATE/TI^E 03/17/87
' 5 A M ?_ L i _C 0 L L i ',. U 'I «: ST3P 3AT-/TIVE 00/00/00
;,i: : PAxJtTTE t;c.CEiv?n FROM:
'L: -JT;/fI1»= 00/00/00 Rf-C'O SY:
CHEMIST:
METHOD:
RESULTS
10U ^.. _
i OTT JG /r
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
5 U UG / L_
^U UG/L
SU U'VL
5U UG/L
5M UG/L_
k'U UG/L
5U UG/L
5U UG/L
5U UG/L.
5U UG/L
•5U UG/L
5U UG/L
CU UG/L_
5U UG/L
•5U UG/L
5U UG/L
101. _
;u UG/L
5U 'JG/L
r-U UG/L
5 U JJG / L_
5U UG/L
5U UG/L
5U UG/L
COMPOUND
CMLORPM^THANE
~Tf? O^RTMr TTT4 f| E
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROfT^ANE
_METHYLFN- CHLORIDE
I,l-DICHLOROETHcNECl»l-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1-niCHLCROETHANE
TPANS-1.2-OICHLORQFTHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETH4ME
1,1,1-TRrCHLOROETHANE
CAP30N TETRACHLORIDE
1 , 2-DICHLQROPRTPAN?
T^avjS-1 , ?-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLnROETHFNECTPICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHAME
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
_2 - CH L.O PJ3 EJLH.tLV INJf L_Eia^8
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
TCLUC.NE.
CHLOROSENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
,,CASc N3.:""236i
COMTRACT LAi:r:
"CONfRACf LAo^r,
» R'£ M A X K :
«•; SA'-'PLE no: c INORG SAMPLE NO.: WDQABSA
RYC.-JORGA'JIC): CENTEC
i
1
SAC.PLc LOG. V E.R.I FIifi_B.rt «iP
_AWP.L.E Q AT A_ VER I FJ ED SY: CHH
- ix^roor'49Tr ~'•••-':••'•
:.:A-A'/b^
-------
O !
:A'?LE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHFNS GFORGIA
sr?
'Od/J5/J7
/
PUPGEASLE C3GANT
~
CS ANALYSIS
X A T ~. ?
'1C.: S7C16:S? SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOW4
i,.SOU-vCc! " :•» : "l i"5 - L '"i t TEVrL.^
: PC»A
RESULTS
10U
—rou
10U
10U
10'J
—SlT~
5U
5'J
5'J
~5U"
5U
5U
5'J
" 5U
5U
••STATION I . ? . : .v : L L 3 C T_
i., ST3SE r sr-Kcv. ij.- "
TAL)
"SAXPLc' CJLLcC TIG'i: STA^T JATi/Tint 03/16/B7
••iAMPL = .CrLL = CJI'J'i:._ST;P UATr/Tl'-l: 00/00/00
"COLL-;:-; :r: : PJ':IJCTTE ^FCEIVEO FROM:
"S4--;PL; 'ii.": o.fE/r:.'!: oo/30/oa REC'O BY:
••s;aL^;:
i
eu
:>u
5U
5U
. 1UUJ_
5U
5U
5U
.
ChrMIST: CH^
' A'lALfTICiL .--ITHDC:
5U
5U
5U
|,CMS= .'JT. : :3fi "J=G SAMPLE \0: D INORG SAC.OLf NO.: »D"(JftS"2*!
; _ c J j T ? u; T Lii;^:n-;YC3«GA;jiC):
l"RE-..4^: — - — J~-
ir R t M A 5 \ :
j' SA.'IPL:: L'jq V E 3 I F I = Q 8Y: WFP S^KPLE DATA VERIFIED °Y: CHH
UNITS
UG/L
-UG/l—
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
~U1/L~~
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"UG/L~"
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L_
UG/L*
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-Ur./u_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
CH LO^O1'ETHANE
3 P a H 0 ME T>1TM F"
VINYL CHLORIDE
ChLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
Ti r-DTCHL050ETHEN€(l,I-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1. 1-DICHLOROETHANc
TSANS-1.2-OICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
"1,2-DICHLO'JOPTrtftSE
1, 1,1-TRICOLOROETHAN?
CARSON TETRACHLORIDE
?.ROMOOICHL3RCM?THANS
"li 2-PICHLC9QPROPAN?
TRANS-1, 3-DICHLORCPRQPENE
TRICHLOROETHENr(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
"OIBROhOCHLOROMETMUNg—
1,1,2-TRICHLCROETHANE
CIS-1.3-OICHLOROPROPENE
-iRoSo^^.mnVINY1-£lH1R
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORTF.THENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
_TOLU"NF .
CHLOROSE^Z'ENE
FTHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
VA-uV~:i;L ViLUf *Nfi-UDT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFER5NCES
fj-i 5TI -!4T-.t VALUE *N-P°£ SU«P TI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
vS-ACTUAL VAL'JC IS KIJOhM T3 2 E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
VALIJ-- is nnquH Tn ag GREATFQ THAV VA<.IIF__GLIV_F_NL
VU-VATiRIAL WiS ANALYZED FOR =UJT MOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
The ;-lINIMJK ^JAiiTITATIDN LIMIT.
-------
3--1PLS AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV
*«:*«« ANALYTICAL RESULT S*****
>
->
~
: \^
' 0 3 / 0 5 / .* 7 f
. ,"
! SV
• PXOJiCT MJ. : ;7-325
• $ J u < c ; : ••.:,: ; L v - r.
,,CITY: cj:jCu\
iT^ii'j-j i.r. ,.;'_'_ i
STj-Ji.7 ST-I; . -.->:
" SAMPLE C'.LLt. TI J <: S
• ^ 'iii^ r *~ i i . ~ r i ' • fi
j M ,. . r L _ i L L L .. i A j . • • ._ i
C J L L L (. r .. 0 ^ Y : ' i : . J
' i>«; r'L^-iZC'- J-Tr/T
C M E '-I I S T : C rl H
4uiLrric«L M THOD:
., c. A s : >x j . : 23 3 " :: o
C j ',' r -;-.'. 7 LJi'T^'TOsYC
^C'j-iR-iCT L--- ;;.T:-:YC
. R t ;•! i * k :
„ R t l-u ri f. :
- SAWFLi.,LOi VL=;iElii_
/ -TH"r'S 3COr.:.r/s
''J^OEAJL-. CRGAVICS ANALYSIS
PL- 'O.: ;7Ci*c-?o SCMPL; TYPH: GROUNOWA
. ... F£.3iJ?A^ -L=ri-MT: RC.^A .
ST4T-: KiC
TtRT OAJJ/Tir'F 03/17/137
-7J£ CAIr/.T.I'-it Oa/1'J/OO
I v E oo/ci/oc" * '" »?c'c BY:
Sflf'PLr NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MTQ4t52
J ""• A n I C ) :
::iCR64\IC): Ci'-ITSC
2Y! WFP S4MO|= DATA VFPIFIED BY: CHH
RESULTS
nu
10U
10U
10U
5U
5U
iU
3U
5U
f U
5U
5U
5U
£U
?U
5U
SU
10UJ
5U
5U
5U
5U
CU
5U
UNITS
UC-/L
UC-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
'JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
?ROMOMtTHAME >
VINYL CHLORIDE'
CHLOROETHANE
VETHYLENr CHL3RI06
1, l-OlChLORO';TH£«ic(lfl-DICriL'OROeTHYLENE5
1 , 1-OICMLO»0=THANE
TR4NS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CPLOROFCRM
1,2-DICHLaROETHANE
1, 1.1-TRICHLOROETH4NE
CAR30N TETRACHLORIPE
3P.DMODICHLnRQM?TH4>]P
1 ,2-OICHLOROPROPANE
TPANS-1 ,3-niCHLOROPROPENE i
TC.ICHLOROEThENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
P E N Z E N =
DI EROM OCHL OR OM ETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLORQETHANE
CIS-1.3-OICHLOROPROPENE
2-CHLORn=THYLVINYL ETHER
BROMOFOSr-l
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
T 0 L U £ 'J E
CHLORO'iENZeNc
rTHYL BENZENS
TOTAL XYLENES
^ ft** Re it i* AS**:.:
" j
„ .' ' ' .:A-lVr?.AoL- V4L Jf*
i * J - ; S T I h i 1 c. il V H L U I
:.:K-4CTUiL VALU: I
• il.-5CTlJJL_.^AL'Ji_l
. f =.: 'J - • 4 T C ^ i A L 1, i 5 «
^ ^ ' ^ 'J' -J'-
vNJ-NOT fl^'LYZcD *NAI-INTcRFERENCES
*N-P?L:SUflPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE 0= MATERIAL
S KNOWN TO bE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
iJUL31i?LJLa_iE_?iEJTE.5.THAN VALUE GIVEN
'MLYZkH FUR JUT NOT OETtCTED. THE NUMd^R IS
TIT4TION LIMIT.
I
1
P
1
11
H
M
.* 1
M
-------
r^ r
P A'liLYSIS YAfJA'jevc
iv
f: ANALYTICAL RES UL T S*****
r"
r
•
•
«
p
p
p
p
p
; A T H F N S r. £ •> f <: i s
' < ** /
'03/J5/i>7 e'u'iGEA'LE ORGAMCS ANALYSIS
WAT = "
i
Si--'. = Lr NC.: J7Cl:Je91 Sl'-'PLE TYPE: C-ROUNDW*
•
L. SL;J-SC=: vr.-:-L -•: t 3rvr>_.
! CITY : C^u^: STAT- : NC
5 T 1 T ' 1 T "' ' / " ' ' *• CrISS "'LV-'- " _/•' •" T At )
i T 3 «; ; r i T „ T ; _i , . _•
"SA^IPL- Cf-LLLCr:.. 3TART CSTE/T:";? 03/17/?7
"^A"?L! v!;c7.: r"-T /T r:-'r 'oo/oo/oo' " ? = ;'*D SY:
» ^ L _, « j •
>» !i 4 L f i r c - L '•. ? r H z "j
.CAS^ 'O.: :->i>J J r. r.a'-'°L:; \3: C IN09G SAMPLE NO.: MOUA853
1 CJNTrfACT LJi r-'AT J-' YC^^iJAMC):
i' S.'^^i
RFSULTS
10U
10U
1QU
10U
5U
5U
SU
5U
5U
5'J
?U
cn
SM
5U
SU
i niu
5U
5'J
Sll
5U
SU
5U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ur./L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U3/L
11',/L
U5/L
UG/L
UC-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
US/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CD"POUHD
VINYL 'CHLORIDE
Cf-LUROETHAME
1, 1 -D I CWLORO? THE NEC 1,1 -OICHLOROETHYLENE)
It 1-niCHLOSCETHtNE
T"ANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
rut opnpnjv
1, 2-DICHLOR05THANE
1, 1,1-TRICHLOPOETHANE
CAO^ON TFTRACHL3RIDE
1,2-niCHLOROPPOPA.Nc
TPANS-li2-OICHLOROPROPFNE
TSICHL3ROETHFNECTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIPROMOCHLO ROME THANE
lilt2-TRICHLORO?THANE
CIS-l,3-niCHLOROPROPENE
?-CHI OROrTHYl VTNYI FTHCR
9ROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETPACHLOROETHftNE
TET^ACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
TPI IJ=MC
CHLOROPENZENE
3THYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
,
S
'•
•'•
••
-
M
»
"
-
•
P
P
P
I-
*»
•4
^v>rJjTr*-T:i-:
v A - t V 5 - A -i 5
*J-.STi;-iT£
-^K-aCTUAL
.-. 1 _ i '" T • 1 " 1
TM= K I ::!(••
VAL'J±
D V 4 L 'J F
VALJS; is
JL4LU; LS
L .K S « '<
u v. -j j a j T
. *^- '•
KNOWN '
K w n w N
ALYZcD
ITATION
OT
SUM
T3
11
LI
'
ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES
PT1V? EVIDENCE Or PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
2- LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
u=5ocaT^oTMa>juBiiiFr:TUPM —
TUT
vlT.
NCT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
i
i — — •
. i
;!
^J
-------
9
9
-*
I
I
• V
0 d / 3 5 / 3 7 P'U
' i S '\ '•' ^
• P R 1 1 - r T tJn.: • 7 --'•>'
.. iJj-iCi. : '••; j. •J-L "•: i
,,C;TY: cj-.v.:1-::
"STifl J1.' I.:. : , -'-L_-'..
,STJ-CT iTtr.;.. ;.,:
" s A v ? L :: '. •: L L £ : T : :n : ST
'COLLECT:'-, _^ : " ?i ju:
"oh ;PL.^-C '_: ^r-./Ti
'" AiJALYTZClL /.L T''j."> :
, CAS:. ,.:. : : •--...' J = G s
"' c u :» r s < c f LM'~-;TJ:YC:
• —
.*« K c ' i *• *^ I\ *
-*i'*' »
AMO arjALYSis :-'.aNa:-Pi''NT SYSTEM
r ° a - 5 7 r, , ft ^ G r v *
BThCNS C-cORGIA »rSULTS
10U
10U
10U
'OE*2L5 OR;•-^>IICS ANALYSIS nu
,m-R su
5U
5U
u" NJ.: 37CiD5d5 S^VOLE TYPE: GPOUMCWA su
;(J
^
LtVrL. 5U
STiT-: NC ?U
SU
5U
i?T D&T=/TI»E 03/17/67 5U
uP [;57-/TIMCQO/1.i/flP 10 UJ
•1C"00/30/00 ^' R;C'D?Y: 5U
5U
?U
5U
;"'PLL ND: C INQPG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA827
:•, C < G a .~i I C ) : C E N T E C
l*«^ Ml
Tn; ••'.K-, iMU^I ;'J3NT
Vt
*Mi-;.'DT a-jALYIEP :::NAI-INT5RFRRFNCES
SN-F'E SUMPT1 V: EVIDENCE! OF PRESENCfc OF MATERIAL
KNOWM TO 56 LESS TH4N VALUE GIVEN
KNJIWM TD a- Gfi£ATC£ THAJ\L VALJJB ciJtEN
5LYZ£0 FDR BUT NQT DETECTED. THF NUMBER IS
I TAT I ON LI ".IT.
•
H
f
»
i •'
"s
-------
S-'^Lr AND 3MLYSIS ,"> iN i C- = H = f,'T SYSTEM
•JPi-iSD.P'C- IV
; , 3THrss -'.en Rr. i ft PCSULTS
•_V - .. . ,' . . 10U
r- ' 10U
i 10U
0£/0:-/;7 riL'ir-;l3L;CRGJVICS5NiLYSIS 1 0 U
1 ' i, tt T r 7 c U
I • su
5'J
' , >-> ' = Lr N:.: bTClafiSi SAV°L= TYPE: GR3UOWA SiJ
(' -.- . . 5'J
5U
5U
1 '_,_„, , ^ _ . su
.. i J U R C t ! !•• i 'J L " . L ? c r. i" C V r L . 5 u
,. ci rr : c:\'co.~ oo/oo/oo R:C'D SY: 25
1 S ; •< L i! L : S'J
' CH = ;-:i3T: CHH "5[j
AlvALY r I CtL ,VC THCr: 1J
. C-ii .... : :^;; -jvi SivpLJ^Vi.p: D INQRC- SAMPLE NO.: NOQA325
cj\r^;c: Li:.--Tj-:rciN'3f')iC): C?NTFC
., R t -i A •! .\ :
'' SA.'lPL^ LUG V--:Tr"-D ?¥! WFP JAKDjc rjftjfl VfftlFJED BY! CHH
.. »
:.!
.•;.... ,
* *v-? = 3j r iJ7i^;'- •::•>
,; *J-cSrr.TE5..THA» VALUF GIVEN ..
.( vU-N-.i^-'.at WAV -NiLYZiD ^OR -fUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
.,1 The r-'INI-iU-! .JACTITATION LIMIT.
vj
UNITS
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UT-/L
Ufi/L
U5/L
UG/L
UC-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U3/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U5/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHL3ROETHANE
MFTHYLEN? CHLORIDE
l.l-DICHLOROFTHENEClTniCHtDRDETHYLENEJ
1,1-OICHLO^OPTHANE
TRANS-lt2-C!CHLQROETHENE
1,2-OKHLOROETHANE
lil, 1-TRICHLOROE THANE
CARSON T^TPACHLORIOE
:,2-blCHLCROPR'5p«N= • •-•
TF.ANS-1,3-DICHLOROPRDP?N?
TRICHLOPO^THENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
Pf NZEHt
CIORQM3CHLOROM ETHANE
cis-l,3-niCHLOP6fROPENE
2-CHLORC:THYLVINYL ETHER
1,1,2,2-TFTRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOR3ETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
fTHYL 9ENZFNE
TOTAL XYLENES
i
i
I
1
^
/ t
; "
"
'•
"
"
"^
r
"
.,
w
:•
-------
S1".»L: AND ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-?SC'.RFG IV
ftftftftft AN AL YT 1C AL R E SULT Sftftftft*
,v
ft /'
I ' OS/05/37
i . '
j i
' ' 1
i • '
• • PROJECTS','*: i7-
• . £ j U X C r : '>' 1 n r R i L
J^CITY: CJ-ICOVJD
! -ST4TI3N I.u-. : :•!--
• ., ST3SET o'T-TIJij ij
'"SAHPLc CCLLECTIO
, •• s A « P L 5 c : u. £_c ; : :
' 'CJLi.£CT£: :'Yt ?
i " i - '-. P L i '< c C ' : : r A
• •• Si AL:u
' A ,M A L > T C A L" /-i C T r< J
. C A S i \ . : 21-, '.
" c j \' r R ,» T L'Z:r-r
1 M
1 „ R C M A -1 A,
: R c v, i K K
;
ATHEUS GEORGIA
PURGEABLE ORG4MICS ANALYSIS
« i T ; S
SAM»Lc
3:6
1?:. !. CCV
LL 64 (C
N : S T 4 R T
N: iJL^P
JATUETTE
::
NO.: 37C16533 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
PROGRAM CLPMENT: PC?A
SL.
STATC: NC
DATE/TIME 03/13/67
DATE/TI'-"? 00/00/00
RECEIVED =RTM:
OC/OD/OC R=C'D HY:
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
su
5'J
5J
5U
5U
5U
10UJ
;u
5U
SU
?U
5U
5U
5U
UNITS
UG/L
"UG/L '
UG/L
UG/L
ur,/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U&/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
CHLORCIETHANE J
'" SROMOMEThakiE ' " "" ' ' ' N
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
McTHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1-DICHLCROETH£NEC1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE>
1( 1-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
" 1,2-DICHLORbETHANE1
1,1,1-TRICHLOROE THANE
CARBON TFTRACHLORIOE
3RCMODICHLORO^ETHANE
1,2-OICHLORdPROPANE
TRANS-lf3-OICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
EENZFNE
DIBROMOCHLflROMETHANE"
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1 , 3-DICHLOROPROPENE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER
RROCOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
J<0 Sai_'HLh N'J: U TJ3R3 SAMPLE NO.: MOOABSS
JRYCI.< ORGAN 1C): CE»JTEC
;;
M
n
M
W'|
!"SAJIP.L£-LOG_.V = S
i:3 PY
WFP
S4MPLE DATA VERIFIED °Y; CHH
11
I—
~ (:<••* :;::•"•,
ft ft ft ft ft ft
ANALYZE!)""
*N A ITTN
• c«-jF.?jT.ijT:i.:--::ft
., :.:A-AVEkior VALUE "ft
1 iO-£STI--,ATE[j V4LUE ':N-PR ESUM P TIVE EVIDENCE OF'PRESENCE OF'MATERIAL
'j *K-ACTUAL VALUr IS KfJDUN TQ BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• L &L-ACIUAL_Vj4UU£ IS KNOWN. TQ aE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN ;
.1 ftU-MAT£
-------
>
»
•fc
---• .,.....-••...- •
r
S-'l'L- AND A'IiLvS:S MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
;P;-:C:,=!3G IV
V
Oa/Oc/<37 P'j:j'"HtEL= O'GiMCS A"^ALYSTS
>-. 5 T f y
SA/.^LC NO.: 37C1655'> Si'-lPLc TYPE: GROU^OWA
u 3.1 i: .- T '!•• • . 7- ' 'A P? it 9 AM = 1 FK?MT ! H C 2 A
SA.-VL; CCLL'.CTI J\: START DAT=/TIH= 03/1T/RT
c MD(- .""llt^TTi.x;" <;T?P lATP/TT^? 00/Qn/OO
CIJLL£:T''U £.Y: o s^^ijrj-rg iJtC'lVED F^nn:
S-";?LC -'iC'i;.: ctfi/Tr-T 00/00/03 RFC': BY:
CMiMIST: CHh
ANALYTICAL METHJD:
• • «-...,..........,.,,.,,,,.,..
*!::::.-..t*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
P=SULTS UNITS COMPOUND
10U UG/L CHLOROMETHANE /
'" 10U
10U
10U
5'J
5U
'•U
yj
5'J
5'J
5LI
5'J
SU
5U
5U
5U
10UJL_
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ur-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
SR'JMC'HrTMaNc \
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO^OETHANE
1 f l-^ICHLO^OcTHrNECl »l-DlCHLORDETHYLENE3
TR4NS-1,2-OICHLORCETHENE
"" It J-DICHLO«OtTMAHE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CA?33N TETRACHLORIDE
1,2-DICHLOROPRnPANE
T*ANS-1,3-CICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLO^OsTHENFCTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
" Ori?0«OCHLOROMETHANE
l.l.Z-TRICHLOROETMANE
CIS-1,3-OICHLQROPRQPEME
7-CHI,OROFTHYLVrNYL ETHER
1, 1 ,2. 2-T = TRACHLOROETHANE
TET»ACHLC»OETH?NECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
CHLOFIOSENZENF
ETHYL SENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
CAit ftj.: 2B6i I!J,G S\«PLi NT: C IN2RG SAMPLE NO.: I"DQ8846
9 f v. i ? .-; :
::
•t
•t
M
n
m
X
I
»
SA.IPLc L.JC- Jr'iSlrl:
L3_M»J^.JIA.TA_yjl5!TJll£2_:M( ;_£tlH_
• W«*r;iT'jf:T rSv-:-1:
SA-A/Zriljf VAL.J6
>L'JE
I::;; !|: :;::•:•:: :|: I:::;::;::'::;:-:: :|! :><:
-------
I,.
r
': ' .\ '1
v
/
oa/05/37
;
PROJECT 'jQ. : S7-32.
C;TY: ~c:..:o)ij
S T A T : 3 :.' I . L . : w - L L
PL^ AND ANALYSIS riNSGEHENT SYSTEM
i°i-£SO,'>-C- IV
6 T H - ;; «. ", -" " ^ G I A
i
p'u^GEAUL: C^CirjICS ANALYSIS
HIT^R
A.-?Lr M3.s 37C16560 SAtPLE TYPE: QCS°IKE
6 PROGRAM !ILEMcNT: PCRA
*.' J f V ? L .
•^TAT^: '1C
STjK^r SUT.J'J re:
S A '•! i3 L i C;LLlCTl5\! STOP C4T?/TI^? 00/00/00
c:LurCT^o -.v: •; °i
j « • r> L a •' : c • j : DAT:
i ; A L •: ^ :
CH;NIiT: CHh
ANALYTICAL r i E T H 3 J :
CAii n . : 2 i '. 3 •} ^
CJif/ACr LAr-:^T:n
Sl^S!
:.::.: V i\ L .'•! A ? ? J •.:::'.:
".•'JCTTE P = C5IVcO PR'JM:
/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
-, SIMPLE MS: C i'JORG SAMPLE NO.: M3QAS60
YCIN ORGANIC): CbNTEC
9 3fl ^?P S9V>Lr TATA VERIFIED BY: CHH •
RESULTS
^
10'J
10U
10U
6J
5U
CU
751!
100?
73'ji
SU
5U
72 'i
5U
73'^!
5U
5U
10U
5U '
56?:
SU
5U
5U
UNITS
yo./i_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UT-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-s#t-
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
'^ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND .
CHLORONCTHANE J
feROHOM^TMANE >
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENP CHLORIDE
1 . l-OICHLOROETHENECl tl-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLGROETHANE
TRANS-1.2-DICHL3ROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1, 2-DICHL3ROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLORQETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
i. 2-DICHLOSOPROPANE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLORDETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROE THANE
CIS-1,3-OICHLO»3PROPENE
2-CHLOPOETHYLVINYL ETHER
i,l', 2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TET^iCHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
TOLUENE
ChLOPOBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
t
I
/'"•
v :.: '^: P. J J " N j r C ^ :-_: -': ~':
" i - '- S T T '-i A T 'c u V i '
! v^-ACTUAL VAL'J;
; i:L-ACTUJL VJLUr
I :::U-v-«TH;iL .JAS
I TH= i-U'Jir-L1'1 M'J
= :.:MA-NOT AM6LYZSO *N A I-INTERFERENC ES
jr f:H-f Pr SU^PTI VE ^VIDENrF OF PRESENCE OF MATPR
IS KNOWN TC E= LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
IS KNOWN TO liE GREATER THAN VALUE GIV = N v '• .
A\^LYZen =QR JUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS,
if.'TITATI3N LIMIT.
IAL
L — _______ _— ^_— ^^^^-_
"X
n
M
M
1'
*
\
M
-------
r
i
i
l V
/:'/
' 03/05/-S7
' !
•
" CUY^CC j^o:i^"'"
" SAM?L£ CC'LLcCTI
•SA.VL: CC'LLuCII
CjLLLCT;; j Y : c
i H •! P L h •< £ C ' . : .•
• i L i L :•. J ••
'CHEMIST: c H h
'ANALYTICAL ,V,;TH
CASb <4J.: 2365"
CJNT3AC7 L-OJRA
"CJNT^ACr L6LC-;-
. R E X A < K : "
. K t MA P X. :
••5 APPLE LCG V£RI
*J !
"
' :.i v *(= 3 J;NJT ;•.=•: ;•
'.:A-aVr«i.oE V
*J-iSTl:--.tTcO
:.= K~AiiTL'AL V-
*U-MATt*i 4L
. 1 THE HIM;/U>'
sA'IPLt AND ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
i ATHENS GEORGIA
p'u^^EASLF CRG4NICS ANALYSIS
W 4 T r R
sA^FLE NC.: S7C15567 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
STATFS NC
3-1-. STiRT OfiTE/TI^< 03/11/87
TJ: iTap_ DATE/TI«; qo/po/oc
-•>>J:TTE RcC;IVcO c^0i':
iTJ/TI-'T 00/00/00 REC'O BY!
uO :
O^G SAMPLE NC: y INS^G SAMPLE NO.: MDQig«7
T'J'IYCnRGANIC) :
TO-'YC I'J3.*GANIC) : Cl'JTEC
=1^0 ^Y: WFP SS«P(F OATA VFRIFIFD flY: CHH '
AL'JE *NA-NQT A'JALYZEO «NA I-INTERFERENCES
ViLUE !:.N-P^CSUMPT1VE EVIOENCF OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
tU; IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
LU= 15 KN9WU_TC Z~ C-REATc^ THAN VALU? GIwr^ '»'--.-
.VIS iMLYZED FOR r.UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
:jA!-,riTATIDN LIMIT. ,
\
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
5U
SO
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5'J _ ..„
5U
SU
5U
5U
SU
50
10UJ .
i'U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
<:« 4 44 A
UNITS
UG/L
— UE/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
u, UG/L ,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
. UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
N
NALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
CHLQPOM6THANE J
HRDMOMtTHANt \
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
"1ETHYLENE CHLORIDE
"l,l-DICHLdROETHEME(l,l-Dl£HLOROETHYLENE>
1, 1-DICHLOROETHAME
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
1,2-OICHLOROETHANE
1«1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BRCMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPArjE
TRANS-IO-DICHLORCPROPENE .
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIPROMOCHLOROM ETHANE
1, 1,2- TR 1C HLORO ETHANE
CIS-l,3-rnCHLOROPROPF.NE
2-CHLORO?THYLVINYL ETHFR
aROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETR4CHLnROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE>
1
• t
11
CHLOR03EN2FNE i"
ETHYL 9ENZEN? !»
TOTAL XYLENES ! '•
... I *
I
• '
1
1
:\
M
•y
-------
Od/05/57
PCTIFCT M f] t p
CITY: c o 'j c o * s
3T4TI; . I.:. :
STdRtT OUTiSJ
SAMPL- COLLi-CT
c-LL^crf: s t :
5. i -1 P L L •< •: C * ^ :
CHEMIST: CHH
C-Sc ,ATr-;
h*K-«CTU4L v
*L-ACTUAI V
«U-VATt'lAL
TnE HINiMU
S-T-'PLF AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPi-ESC.RrC-IV '
ATHFN<: GEORGIA RESULTS
' ' 10U__
PURGEAeLE ORGA'JTCS ANALYSIS ' '
d 4 T ; R
S4MPL? NC.: BTClA^Sa SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
T-T> f, PRQ^RAM -Lcf*eNT: RCRA
, ^'r i DrV'L.
STAT;: NC
!u'' -r ••. i 4 N K fni<;r nivFO ''^TALI
!?'j: START DATE/TIMS 03/17/57
L 'ATUHTTE RECEIVED *=R3.'i:
CATi/mir CO/00/00 KEC *D 3Y:
HOD:
T^; SAMPLE NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA850
iTVYC'-UGAMO:
iTORYC INTRGiNIC) : C?NTEC
^IJ^TJ ay> HrP ^IMPIF P5TA VFCTFTFr* RYi THH •
"v.i
ViL'J- *'J
-------
•|PLr AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-eSCtREG IV
SS***ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
J i
; v.
/; '
••> i '
I ' 03/05/37
• :i
' • PROJECT NC. : 27
!.. sj'jrfts: .''.inf3ii
1 • S T A T I C M T . J . : -
, S T 3 < t r i T t T 1 1. .
-> 1
["SAMPLE ccLLiCri
j-SA'-IPL; OCLLiCTI
-« '"COLLECT.; .- Y : f
i " s ». •: p L .-. •; : c ' L : j
I " A ,M A L f T I C 1 L i,ETu
t-
,,CASE .Jj.: CitJ
^ i u C 0 M TRACT L A L ::\ 4
' Of. VI M. . •
ATHENS S E 0 * G ! 4
P'USGEABLE C9GANICS ANALYSIS
S1"*L= NO.: ?7CloS89 SAMPLE TYP>=: ELKWA
r?^5_ . P?nQ°4JLIL?!'.ENT: RCRA. .
!; . '1 0 r v = L .
STSTF: NC
::t: START 04T|/Ti;''E 03/17/37
4T:/r:.'.r 00/00/OC" " RFc''0 Br:
ir:
^G SAMPLE NO: D INORG SIMPLE NO.: MOQA851
RESULTS
10U
nu
10U
10U
5U
5U
5U
5U
su
SU
SU
5U
. 5'J ., ..
5U
SU
SU
_10UJ
5'J
5U
SU
5U
SU
UMTS
UG/L
UG/L
. U5/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L .
UC./L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ""
UG/L
UG/L
.UC-/L -
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
, UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U3/L
COMPOUND
HROKOMETHAHE ' ~t
VINYL CHLOPIDE • >
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLTN= CHLORIDE
TRANS-1, 2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLORCC0'JM
"~1,2-DICHLOROETHANE " ': 1
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CftPRON TETRACHLO»IOE ' , - 1
5ROMOOJCHLOROMETHANE .. -.; -- ' , ..
. 2-blCHLOROPROPANE
R ANS- 1,3-0 1C HLOROPROCENE
TRICHLOSOETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) .
fENZENE
OIO-ROMOCHLOROMEtHANg
1 , 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ;'
CIS-1.3-OICHLOROPROPEMS ; • '. i -
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHEft - . . ; . ' i . :
i,l,;.2-TETRACHLOROETH»Ht
TETRACMLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE):
T f L U F N c
CHLQROBENZENE
FTHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES ' '
.'. YJ_H/.P 5 VA°J^£_ J3 AT « . V E » IE I ED_g Y : CH M
— !
• ::<*-.!- JJTTJT; s-.-
*i-4tfi^ii,t
V J L'j E
ENCEl
«J-cSTI.iaT:2 VALU- *N-F ?C SUMPTIVE EVIOE'JCE OP P?FSCNCF OF~MATERI4L
*K-6CruAL VttLJ; IS KNOWN TO fcE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
jfL-ACTJAL. VALU£_LS_J!JJ'J>'_'L_T-0_i:_5J'JATl:! I94N V^LUi GIVEN .-',.'•.•.
*U-HAT£7UL >.iS ANALYZED FOR F1UT NOT DETECTED.' THF NUHEER it
THc »IN1.'-'U:-' JJANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
r
03/05/37
P*OJ = CT. in,: ;
&uusci: •<::• .**
ciry: c. no :,.•>•:>
3 r AT : 3 •.:.:.;
SAMPLE CCLLTCT
SAMPLE .C.^LLLCT
5iiL;u :
CHEMIST: CHH
ANALYTICAL n:T
C~S- .,"'.: 'i^j
L j \ r -f „ . r L - _. '
R c M A ?. K :
S c H A 3 K :
SA:i£L£_i.2ji_ltii
SftM?LE AND AMALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS GEORGIA
'URGEASLc 0"G«NICS ANALYSIS
yir.1:?
iA. PLC NC.: 37C!ni31 SA«PLE TYPE: PUMPBLK
7-?:*. PirnG?A« =LEM£NT: RCRA
L ':= '. O?V;L.
STAT?: NC
"J-- =LiSK (~ISS3LV>;'D METAL)
:o:<: START DATE/TIM? 03/13/37
I3fj: STJP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
D-TE/TI'.F 00/00/00 REc'*D SY:
H3T. : • ' ;'
i^c, SAMPLE NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA752
ATC-!YCO!?GANIC>:
TFTFO 3Y: «FP SAMPLE DATA VERIFTFD BY: CHH
\
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
5U
5'J
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
SU
5U
5U
5U
10UJ
EU
5U
5U
5J
5U
5U
5U
«««*^ftNALYTT.CAL RESULTS**!1;** '
UNITS COMPOUND
UG/L CHLQROMETHANE ' v'
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
IJG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENP CHLORIDE
l,l-DICHLQROETHEME
•JuS AfiALYZEC FOR RUT NCT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
H 3UAUTITATIQN LIMIT.
i
i
i
*
X
m
M
tf
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
08/06/87
PURGEABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
W4TER _
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16582
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT:_J?CRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE t DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
'STATION i.e.: WELL i (DISSOLVED MEIALJ
STORET STATION NO:
'SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/16/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP._DATE/JIME_OO/OO/O.O
'COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED: _ .
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
( **«**ANAUYTICAL RESULTS«»«««
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
5U DIFLUORODICHLOROMETHANE
5U ~~IODOMETHANE ~" ~
10UJ ACROLEIN
10U .ACRYLONITRILE
5UJ '-. TRICHLOROFLUQROMETHANE
50UJETHYL CYANIDE
5U 3-CHLOROPROPENE
5U DIBROMOMETHANE
-SOUR ___ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL _
5000UR • 1,4-DIOXANE
SOUR CROTONALDEHYDE <•
5U 1,2-DIBROMOE.THANE
_SU lil,l,2-TETRACHLOROETHANJ=
5U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
SOUR . TRANS-l,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
10UJ ' l,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
_10UJ ACETONE
5U ' CARBON DISULF1D6 ''
10UR METHYL ETHYL KETONE
10U VINYL ACETATE ?'
_10U L_METHYL_ISOBUTYL KETONf_ *_
iou METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5U • STYRENE
J <
V
a
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D
CONTRACT LABORATORYCORGANIC):
CONTRACT LABORATORYCINORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK: ~ "" ~"
REMARK:
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MD3T5TF
SAMPLE. LOG^ VERIFIED .BY :_WFP
)ATA_V.ERIF_1ED_BYJL_CAH_
R-i3UALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
'R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT _ __
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY F~OR~"VE~RTFICATION~
*A-AVERAGE VALUE SNA-NOT ANALYZED *NAlTfNfERFEREN~CET~
=>J-ESTIMATEO VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 8E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
_*L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN_TO .BE. GREATER THAN VALUE..GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR" BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER'lS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
VJ.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
08/06/87
'URGEA
PURG;EABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16592
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT:
. SOURCE:"MINERAL RE t DEVEL. ~
RCRA
STATE: NC
2 (DISSOLVED.METAL)_
CITY: CONCORD
STATION I.D. : WELL
STORET STATION NO:
'SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/37
• SAMPLE COLLECTION:,STOP__DATE/TIME_OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE RcC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
>SEALED:
RESULTS
5(1 _
"5U
10UJ
10U
5UJ _
-50UJ -
5U
5U
SOUR
5000UR~
SOUR
5U
_5U _
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
"5U --
10UR
10U
10U _
~
5U
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
DIFLUORODICHLOROMETHANE
"IODOMETHANE
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
"ETHYL CYANIDE
3-CHLOROPROPENE
OIBROMOMETHANE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
"1,4-DIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYDE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
~1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1.4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
1.2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULF1DE " " "
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ;
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
STYRENE
CHEMIST:
• ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG"~SAMj>rrW:~D
CONTRACT LABORATQRY(ORGANIC):
CONTRACT LABORATORYdNORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
INORG S AH P L E N 0 . : M"D CfATT'T
_0_ATA_VERIF.I_EO BY: CHH
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECE 55A"RY~FOR 'VERTFICATION
r
vA-AVERAGE VALUE
*J-ESTIMATED VALUE
*NA-NOT ANALYZED"
-! NTfR"F f RTN C E~S~
*N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
_*L-ACTUAL VALUERS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
-------
••(•,.•
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
J
^
»
•
t
*•*
ATHENS GEORGIA
f f 1 "
i' 08/06/87 PURGEABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
f WATER
.
*
'. SAMPLE NO.: 97C16583 SAMPLE TYPE: GROU.NDWA
•PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
.. SUUKlb: MINcRAL Kt t OEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
•STATION I.D.: WELL 3 (DISSOLVED METAL)
., SlUKbl STATION NO:
" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/16/87
•• SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
'COLLECTED BY: o PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
RESULTS I
5U
5U
10UJ ,
10U
5UJ
50UJ
5U
5U
SOUR
" " 50000R ~
- SOUR
5U
5U
5U
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U
10UR
10U
10U
10U
5U
SAMPLE RcC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST:
1 ANALYTICAL METHOD:
,CASE NO.: 2363 ORG~SA'MPrE~NO F'O
CONTRACT LA&ORAT09YCORGANIO:
'CONTRACT LAdORftTOaYCINORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK :
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
DIFLUOROOICHLOROMETHANE
IODOMETHANE
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ETHYL CYANIDE "
3-CHLOROPROPENE
OIBROMOMETHANE
IS08UTYL ALCOHOL
1,4-DIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYDE
i,2-DIBROMOETHANE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,4-0ICHLORO-2-BUTENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLORDPROPANE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE~"
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE i
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE"
STYRENE
"IN01G~S~AMPLE NO.: MDSSTTT
SAMPLE LOG .VERIFIED, BY:_.WFP_
_D A T A_V E R I.F_I E 0 _B.YJ_C H H_
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUNO MAY CR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY "FOR "VER IFIC'ATIO'R"
:^A-AVERAGE VALUE
i *J-ESTIMATED VALUE
_ _ ___ _ _
*NA-NOT ANALYZED " *NAI"-INTE RFE RENCEl
ON-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
"I. <:K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOrfN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
-L_J&L--— ------ _.___._ ..- ._
. ACTUAL.VALUE .IS .KNOWN_TO- BE.GREATER THAN VALUE .GIVEN _i^:
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS"
1 THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
I,, I
V—
-------
ri
r ,
r,
r i
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
! ATHENS GEORGIA
r f i
' 08/06/87 PURGEABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
WATER
• I
'j SAMPLE NO.: 37C16S90 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
• i
•PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL »c £ DEVEL.
,CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
-STATION I.D.: WELL 4 (DISSOLVED METAL!
, STORET STATION NO:
'SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
-SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
'COLLECTED BY: o PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
*
RESULTS I
5U
5U
10UJ
10U
5UJ
50UJ
5U
SU
SOUR
SOOOUR
SOUR
5U
5U
5U
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U
10UR
10U
10U
10U
5U
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
DIFLUORODICHLOROMETHANE
IODOMETHANE ~" '
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TR1CHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ETHYL CYANIDE "
3-CHLOROPROPENE
DIBROMOMETHANE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
1,4-DIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYDE
1,2-OIBROMOETHANE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE_
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPR3PANE
TRANS-1.4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
1,2-DI8ROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE
METHYL_ISOBUTYL KETONJ: ^
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
STYRENE
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC):
CONTRACT LABORATORYCINCRGANIC): CENTEC
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA8S2
REMARK:
REMARK:
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED_3Y.r_WFP_
_DA.TA_VERIFIED-BY;_CHH_
" R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
•• R-COMPQUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT _
, R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
SA-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES
Sj-ESTIMATEO VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
SK-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
_=n-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN.TO.BE. GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN_^
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
•4*- -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
1 ATHENS GEORGIA
i oa/06/87 PURG'EABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
I . WATER
|- SAMPLE NO.: 87C16591 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
' i
!.ppn.iFfT Nn.: 87-i?6 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
i, SOURCE: MINERAL RE c DEVEL.
'.. CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
•;•• STATION i.o.: UPLL 4 (DISSOLVED METAL)
.. STORET STATION NO:
" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
••SAMPLE COLLECTION: STQP OATF/TIME oo/oo/oo
l" COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
RESULTS I
SU
5U
10UJ
10U
5UJ
50UJ
5U
5U
SOUR
5000UR
SOUR
5U
SU
SU
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U
10UR
10U
10U
10U
5U
SAMPLE REC'C: DATE,/TIKE 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
SEALED: .. .. .. . .
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
01FLUOROOICHLOROMETHANE
IOOOMETHANE
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROME.T.HANE
ETHYL CYANIDE
3-CHLOROPROPENE
DIBROMOMETHANE
IS03UTYL ALCOHOL
1,4-OIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYOE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE .
1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1.4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
1.2-OIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ACETONE _
CARBON DISULFIOE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE i
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETQNE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
STYRENE
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: 0
CONTRACT LAEdRATCUYCORGANIC}:
CONTRACT HBOR4TO?Y(INORGANIC): CENTEC
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQHS53
REMARK:
REMARK:
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY:.WFP.-
.DATA_VERIFIED_BY:_CHH_
R-2UiLITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COHPQUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT _______
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
! I
««*44««#*
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
' ATHENS GEORGIA
'-V ._ .. /
/" / I
' oa/06/87 PURG'EABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
1 - . WATER
\' SAMPLE NO.: 87C16585 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
, 'PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
.SOURCE: MINERAL RE £ DEVEL.
,. CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
•STATION I.O.: WELL 5 (DISSOLVED METAL}
i • STOSET STATION NO:
" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
• SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP . DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
. COLLECTED BY: 0 PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
RESULTS I
5U
5U
10UJ
10U
5UJ
SOUJ
5U
5U
SOUR
SOOOUR
SOUR
5U
5U
5U
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U
10UR
10U
10U
10U
5U
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA827
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY!
• SEALED: . . .
'CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
• CASE NO.: 2363 ORG~ S AMPLE~ NO : ~D
.CONTRACT LAB3RATORY(ORGANIC>:
CONTRACT LABORATORYCINORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMAPK:
SAMPLE LOG-VERIFIED BYt-WFP.
«««REMARKS*«*
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT .
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
**$*fcANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
DIFLUOROOICHlOROMEIJiANE
IODOMETHANE
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMtTJIANE
ETHYL CYANIDE
3-CHLOROPROPENE
DIBROMOMETHANE
IS09UTYL ALCOHOL
1,4-DIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYDE
1,2-DiaROMOETHANE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE.
1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-l,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
1.2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE '
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE I
_METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
STYRENc
V
~l—
I-I *A-AVEEAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED" " &NAI-INTERFERENCES
., *J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
SK-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOiJN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
!*^ SL-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN .TO._BE_GR£ATER THAN VALUE GIVEN CJ. ' ..
I* 4U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBE~R IS
(..I THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
\
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
08/06/87
PURGEABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS. MISC
. .. WATER. .
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16584
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
01PLUOROOICHLOROMETHANE
IODOMETHANE
ACRCLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TR 1CHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
"ETHYL CYANIDE
3-CHLOROPROPENE
DIBRQMOMETHANE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT!_ RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE t DE'VEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: WELL 6 (DISSOLVED METAL). _
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
STOP .DATE/TIME.00/00/00
COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED: ._
5U
5U
10UJ
10U
5UJ
50UJ
5U
5U
SOUR .._
50000Rli4-DIOXANE
SOUR CROTONALDEHYDE
5U 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
5U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
SOUR TRANS-1.4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
10UJ l,2-OIBRCMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
5UJ ACETONE
5U CARBON DISULFIDE
10UR METHYL ETHYL KETONE
10U VINYL ACETATE
10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL'BUTYL KETONE
5U STYRENE
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPTE~~NO:~D
CONTRACT LABORATQiJYCORGANIC):
CONTRACT LA80RAT03Y(INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
"IN ORG SAMPLE NO".: M'DOATzV
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED.B Y :
_DA.TA_VERIF.IED_BY:_CHH_
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-C3MPQUND MAY Ql? MAY NOT BE PRESENT . . _______
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED SNAI-INTERFERENCES
SJ-ESTIMATED VALUE "SN-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 8E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
_$L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN_TO .35 GREATER THAN VALUE. GIVEN.... .
SU-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
,' ' 08/06/37
PURGEASLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
WATER
»
V
I • I
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16593
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE t'OEVEL. ~ " — - -
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.O.: WELL 6A (DISSOLVED METAL)
ST3RET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/18/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: _STOP DATE/TIME o.o/oo/oo
COLLECTED BY:
SAMPLE REC'D:
SEALED:
0 PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
r
r
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
DIFLUORODICHLOROMETHANE
' IOOOMETHANE '
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUORGMETHANE
ETHYL CYANIDE "
3-CHLOROPROPENE
DIBROMOMETHANE
IS08UTYL ALCOHOL
1,4-DIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYDE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE"
TRANS-l,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
l,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE |
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL'BUTYL KETONE
STYRENE
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D
CONTRACT LA60RATORY(ORGANIC):
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INCRGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK: ' ~ ~
REMARK:
SAMPLE LOG_VERIFIED_BY:_WFP_
SAMPLE NO.: MDQA85~5
.DATA_VE RIFI^ED BY: CHH
r
r
!•
ri:
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
• R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-SESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICTTTTOfT
*A-AVERAGE VALUE 4NA-NOT ANALYZED "*NAT-'IWTE'RFERENCR
*J-ESTIMATEO VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
_*L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN . -
<=U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZEO'FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBflT^rS '
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
I ATHENS GEORGIA
\ I
' /
08/06/87 PURG'EABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, wise
WATER
i
j SAMPLE NO.: B7C16586 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE t DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: WELL 7 (DISSOLVED METAL)
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME oa/17/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
RESULTS I
5U
5U
10UJ
10U
5UJ
50UJ
5U
5U
SOUR
5000UR
SOUR
5U
5U
5U
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U
10UR
10U
10U
10U
SU
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED: .
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
****«ANALYTTCAL RESULTS*****
IN:. UG/L COMPOUND NAME
OIFLUORODICHLOROMETHANE _
T.OOOMETHANE' ~
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROME THANE _
ETHYL CYANIDE
3-CHLOROPROPENE
DIBROMOMETHANE
IS03UTYL ALCOHOL _
1,4-OIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYDE
1.2-OI3ROMOETHANE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANF. '
TRANS-1.4-OICHLORO-2-BUTENE
1 ,2-OI8ROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ACETONE _ .
CARBON DISULFIOE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE i
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
STYRENE
/•
"
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D
CONTRACT LAB9RAT3RYCORGANIC):
'CONTRACT LAdORATORYCINORGANIC): CENTEC
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQ.A846
REMARK :
REMARK :
SAMPLE LOG_VERIFIcO._BY:_WFP_
_OATA_VERIFIED_B.I1_CHH_
ft
ft
~H
R-3UALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPGUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT _
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOS VERIFICATION
_ _
, i *A-AVERAGE VALUE " *NA-NOT "AMAlYlW " " *MAI-INTERFER'ENC'ES
I i *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OP MATERIAL
I I *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO flE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
I-, *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN..TO BE. GREATER . THAN .VALUE. GIVEN '
i.'. SU-MATERIAL '«IAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
08/06/87
PURGEABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
WATER . . . .
»
I
I
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16587
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO.: 37-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
.SOURCE: MINERAL RE t OEVEL. " ~
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
• STATION I.O.: TRIP BLANK COISSOLVEO METAL)
, STORET STATION NO: " ~~
'SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/11/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP...DATE/TIME.00/00/00
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
08/06/87
j
PURG/EABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
. WATER
\
RESULTS
-18 ---
10UJ .
10U
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16588
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA;.
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 _ .. PROGRAM . ELEMENT :_ RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE t DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: BAILER BLANK_< 01SSOLVED_M£TAL)_ _
STORET STATION NO:
START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
STOP_DATE/TIME_00/00/00_
1 SAMPLE COLLECTION:
•SAMPLE COLLECTION:^
COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED: _.
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
5U
SU
SOUR
-500001
SOUR
5U
.5U
5U
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U
10UR
10U
10U
10U
5U
.
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-CDMP3UND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT __ __ _ __
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
*NA-NOT ANALYZED
*NAl-INTERFERENCES
-AVERAGE VALUE
ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF~PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
-ACTUAL. VALUE.IS KNOWN_TO .3E.GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN ._j_^
-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBEFT5
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT. . ,
-------
0
^*
»
»
1
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-cSD.REG IV
I ATHENS GEORGIA
r V /
r f 1
''08/06/87 PURG^ABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
' . . WATER
| SAMPLE NO.: 87C16589 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKHA
.!
• PROJECT .NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
..SOURCE: MINERAL kt & UEVEL.
,,CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
-STATION I.D.: FIELD BLANK (DISSOLVED METAL)
, STORE! SlAlluiM NU:
" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME os/17/87 '.,-."/•
• SAMPLE. COLLECTION: . STOP DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
^COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE, /TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED:
*
RESULTS I
5U
bU
10UJ
10U
5UJ
'50UJ
5U
5U
SOUR
5000UR '
SOU (
5U
5U
5U
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U (
10UR 1
100 \
10U J
10U t
5U <
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
,CASE NO.: 2363" ORG~S~AMPrE~ NO : ^D ~ "
CONTRACT LAbORATORYCORGANIC):
'CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC) : CENTEC
.REMARK: " " —
, REMARK:
"INORG SAMPLE NO.: MD~QA851
SAMPLE LOG. VERIFIED. BY.:_WFP
OATA_V.ERIf.IE.D_B.T ?_C1IFICTtTStT
"*NA-NOT "ANALYZ ED"
f N AI - INIt FR? ETE" N C ET~
SA-AVERAGE VALUE "
>
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
! , ATHENS GEORGIA
A
08/06/87 PURGEABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC
WATER
i
' SAMPLE NO.: 87C16581 SAMPLE TYPE: PUMPSLK
1
i ... .... ,.
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE £ OEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: PUMP BLANK CDISS3LVED METAL)
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/13/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
COLLECTED BY: D PAQUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
RESULTS I
5U
5U
10UJ
10U
5UJ
50UJ
5U
5U
SOUR
5000UR
SOUR
5U
5U
5U
SOUR
10UJ
10UJ
5U
10UR
10U
10U
10U
5U
SAMPLE REC'O: DATE./TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:1
SEALED:
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: 0
CONTRACT LABORATORYCORGANIC):
CONTRACT LABORATORYCINORGANIC) : CENTEC
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA752
****«ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
DIFLUORODICHLOROMETHANE
IODOMETHANE ^ ~ '
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ETHYL CYANIDE " ~~
3-CHLOROPROPENE
DI8ROMOMETHANE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
1,4-OIOXANE
CROTONALDEHYDE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
1 ,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 .2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE "
TRANS-l,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ACETONE
CARBON OISULFIDE "
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL~BUTYL KETONE
STYRENE
REMARK:
REMARK:
SAMPLE LOG.VERIFIE.O_BY.:_WFP._
,D A T A_V E RI F.I E D_B Y_:_C H H_
»
R-QUftLITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMOQUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT _ __
,R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
«^
OA-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED #NAI-INTEftFERENCES
3J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
SK-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
=>L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN_TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
OU-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AMD ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E?A-ESD,REG IV
| ATHENS GEORGIA
f, f
, 03/05/37
RESULTS
_10iL
FXTR/ACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA REpOPTING SMEET
• WATER '
SAMPLE NO.: 67C16582
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
10U
10U
10U
_10LL
10U
10U
10U
JLQ.U_
. .
****«ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
M.E1H Y L METHACR Y LJ TE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
PYRIOINE
. , N-NITROSO-OIMETHYLAMINE
ETHY L HETHACRYLATE ' .' -
Z-HEXANONE
2-PICOLINE
N-NITROSO-METHYLETHYLAMINE
1 P_R.QJ£.C1_JJLU-: &7-3?&
.sou-iCt:: "IN;. SAL RE e
till: CONCORD
PROGRAM. ELEMENT: RCRA
r
r
r
r
OEVEL.
STATE: NC
1 CriSS?LVEC METAL)
•• STATUS:.:. UJ:J.L_
,,STJS5T STaTlC.'J NG:
"SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/16/87
" SAMPLECCLLLCTIGN; s T 3 P PATE/TIMEOO/OQ/QO
10U i, N-NITROSO-DIETHYLAMINE
10U '. . TRAMS-1.4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
10U i : \. ANILINE
_1-0 !J •••-'-. P E N T ACH LDfiHEJLHAN £_
10U
10U
10U
__
10U
10U
SOUR
10 u
N-NITR3SOPYRROLIOINE
N-NITROSCMORPHOLINE
ACETOPHENONE
:_-TJ3LUJDIN£_
1 .2-OIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
N-NITROSOPIPERIDINE
A.A-OIMETHYLPHENETHYLAHINE
"jCOLLECTiD SY: D P40UETTE
"SAMPLE REC'C: DATE,/TIME 00/00/00
RECEIVED FROM:
REC'O BY:
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 2363 C^G SAMPLE NO: C
CONTRACT LA&32.Urj;maR&ANIC):
CONTRACT LAcC^ATO^YCINCRGANIC): CENTEC
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA822
REMARK:
REMARK:
OATA VFRTFTFP BY! CHH
SAM£Lc—LQG—V_ERTFIgD BY;..WPP
"R-QUALITY /CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UN'JSEABLE
10U
10UJ
10U
-10.UJL
10U
10U
10U
-LQ1LJ_
10UJ
10U
10U
_10 U
10U
10U '
10UJ
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
ISOSAFRCLE
1.4-NAPHTHOQUINOMF
M-DINITROBENZENE
4-METHYL-2-NITROANILINE'
PENTACHLOROeENZENE
L=NA PJUH.Y.LAKIN E
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIOINE
_ , 2-01P HFNYLHYPRAZINE
DIPHENYLAMINE (1)
PHENACETIN
4-AMIUOBIPHENYL
_ J-1A Y
Y tint RF
= a-cSTIMATED VALUE 9N-PRESUKPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 3E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
3L-ACTUAL. VALLj; IS KNOWN Tn BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEM •. I:":''•'..:.••..:-.-
SU-'IATCRIAL WAS ANALYZED >=OR BUT NOT CETECTEO. THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MIMIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. . ' .,'-i.^"
10U
10U
10U
_10'J
10U
10U
10U
10LJ
ETHYL METHACRYLATE
2-HEXANONE
2-PICOLINE
J-NITRQSQ-HETHYLETHYLAMINE
METHYL METHANESULFONATE
N-NITROSO-DIETHYLAMINE
,TRANS-l,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
'
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPa-£SD,R?G IV
, ATHENS GEORGIA
"v Oa/05/67
i-
»!:i
I • '.
i •;
EXTK/ACTABLE ORGVIIC ANALYSIS, MISC
' DATA P.EOORTING SHEET
. VI «T? ?
SAMPLE NO.: 37016532
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT_NO.: 37-32S
"
MINtt'AL "SE t UEVEL
CITY: CJNCC^D
ELEMFNT; RCSA
STATE: NC
STATION' l.T.J >.cLL 1 (3I?S">LV;D METAL?
, STiRtT STATITi ;JJ:
'SAMPLc CCLLcCTIJ.j: STSRT DATE/TI!»S 03/16/87
_£5^U CC U
COLLrCTEC HY: D PiOUCTTE PECEIVED FROM:
tC'C: DATEf/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL MfcTHOO:
C A S £ N 3.: :3 i 3 0X0 SAMPLE NO: D
CJ
-------
'.'•' £-'.'•. •
• ""• <-' '•'••• .1
E AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
£PA-rSD,SEG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
03/05/37
SXTR/ACTABLE OPG4NIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
__K AliJ?
SAMPLE NO.: 67C15592
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
»
•»
P. S 0 JECT_NC , : _37_-?26 _ PROGRAM ELEMENT: R_CRA_
. SJiKC:! KIN = »iL VI *. D'VfL. ~ "~
CITY: CDNC.IS: STATE: NC
V E. 0 . *• LI AJJL
STATION I . D . : .V ; L L 2
— • a\ -n: "
'SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
' SAHPL.s_£QLLECTriN.:_SJJlP OATE/TI^g 00/00/00
-> ! COLLECTED SY: P PAQUETTE KECCIVEO FROM:
"SAMPLE REC'L: DAT;,/TIKE oo/oc/oo REC'D SY:
;•• SCALED;
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL I'ETHOQ:
I..CAS; Ml.: 2J63""J"^. S"j*.PLE NO: 0 INO?"G" SAMPLE NO.: MDQT854
|"CJ'jrAA:T i.A:-:|: # * :|::)! :|!:;
* ********:!:«
*N A-N'Ot "ANALYZED *N A i-1 NT E P.F E R ENC E s
V
RESULTS
.10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
«****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
*J-6STIMATfc[; ViL'Jc ^N-^R? SU».P TIVE " E VI DENCE"oF *PR E S'ENCE"OF"M ATERI AL
=»K-ACTUAL V6LU? IS KNOWN TC BB LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
, 'JU-MATEXIAL >IAS ANALYZED Fi}» "UT NOT DETECTEO. THS NUMBSTTT"
TNE t<>TIM«T£D MINIMUM QUAMTITATION LIMIT.
_
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
-w
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
1CUJ
10UJ
SOUR
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_JOUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10US
_LOUf
10UR
10UR
100UR
10UR'
10UR
10UJ.
IN: UG/L
_M=THYL
COMPOUND NAME
PYRIDINE
N-NITROSO-DIMETHYLAMINE
ETHYL M!!THA_CRYLATE _
"2-HEXANONE " " "
2-PICCLINE
M-NITfQSO-METHYLETHYLAMINE
_HETHYL MFTH4NESULFOMATE _
N-NIT00Sa-Dl£~THYLAMIN£ "
TRANS-1.4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
ANILINE
PENTAC^HLOROETHANE
"
N-NTTROSOMORPHOLINE
ACETOPHENONE
3-TQLUiriNc __
~l,2-DIBRO«10-3-CHLOROPROPAME"
N-NITROSOPIPERIOINE
A.A-DIMETHYLPHENETHYLAMINE
_H E X A C.B L Q R O.P ROPENE _ 1
SAFRCLE
1,2, 4, 5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
ISOSA^KOLE
.
M-DINITROSENZENE
4-METHYL-2-NITR04NILINE
PENTACHLOR08ENZENE
.1-N4PHTHYLAMINE.
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIDINE
1 ,2-OIPHENYLHYORAZINE
"DIPHENYLAMINE (1)
PHENACETIN
4-AMIHOPIPH5NYL
PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE
P-DIMETHYL4MIN04ZOBENZENE
4,4'-METHYLENE9IS(2-CHLOROANILINE)
,3,3'-rDI»lETHOXYeENZIPI,NE _ ___
7,12-DIMETMYLBENZCA)ANTHRACENE
3-METHYLCHOLANTHRENE
N-NITROSODI-N-BUTYL4MINE
"
OIBFNZOCA ,E)PYREN=
2 ,6-DICHLOROPHcNOL
3,3'-[lIMHTHYLBENZIDINE
_.___. __
DI3ENZO(A,H)PYRENE
OI-N-PROPYLNITROSAMINE
BENZYL ALCOHOL
2-M£THYLP HINDI __
-------
;; • •:,;•• - ••• ' •• '•":' "•';: • ' ' - ' '-'''v , ' -"".,£} '.'••' •
n , , i t
"• !
«
,„><: .,.„.........,..,....,....,...,.
''•'" NOlitfDldlb3Ai^ «
IldWOS3ad-N* 3QlrA CSlf^I 15 ? -IJ* ( ^
-,..-.-STi.Mrc = ..-..- -
'" " " "' "" " "" '' '" " '' " " '•' '" "'"" " "•" " ''" "'""" "" '" " " "' """ "' - ""
•921 aaD 0»)C30333X3 S3WI1 9M010H" ^
flSISHiJ!3i»3icSi icaiNbVunvPC-|: €
: M y v n = a " >-
j >S8*ccW :-ON ai«,s 0,0,1 °3iN3V:^S^r^rJ^i^ "
• . -
4(
«
M
1
•' 1
«•
/
:AE O."'3a 00/00/00 sWIl/'IiVC :C.O?V ^Idl-*1?,!
:W08a 02AI303* 31130L fd j :A: C^iOSIICD^i-
00/00/00
i9/il/£0
ON
dWil/aivu duj.i ;"•"; x J- ' _ J -1I<=A">"!
:LM t'CIliJIS 1 = JIC1S "
* 'I
•aihi- G'-iU^NC"1 'AlIDi"1*"
;; ' / ' '. ™J" '1W3W:"" "5CJwea '" tr ' u'" "="•""».. f
• 3NniN?o«iiM-£ snos
• •; . •'•'' '-' . ' ,<.,*.: 3N3TVHlHdffNTAHl3W-Z mOI
• • , . . - • • SNIIINffCaOThD-* • aflOI
Vi v ' aior oiD7N3a rnos
• f 'lONlHdTAnlaW-* mOI
3MVN ONOOdMOD 1/90 :NI S110S3S
^t^i^i^^sxnnssu nvoiAATVNv^^v^v
VNQNno.9 :3dAl 31dW,S ZSS
133MS 9N1
DSIW 'SISA1VMV D
AI 93a*
W31SAS 1N3W30VNVW
/
9lOio : 'ON 31dHS , ; ^
i
INS9SO SlSViO^illXa /8/SO/FO^ >-
SISAHNS QN» 5Tdrt?S
" \
( . ,<-.. lt».
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS waNAGEMENT SYSTEM
E?A-ESD,PEG IV
ATHENS GiiTRGIA
«<:*;;:!:!«») 4 LY TIC AL RESULTS*****
IN! UG/L COMPOUND NAME
EXTR/ACTAeLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DAT 4 REPORTING SHEET
>?
SAKPLF NO.: 37016533
S4MPLE TYPE: r,ROU'JDW4
! • PROJECT. ML . :. 87-226 PRTGRA" ELEMENT; RCRA
'.. iOU-iCc: KKcSAL «: t SEVci".
PYRIDINE
N-NITRCSO-OIM ETHYL AMINE
-tTHYL_METHAC?YLATF. __
2-HEXAMQNc
2-PICOLINF
N-MT32SC-METHYLETHYLAMINE
METHYL METHAN^SULPONATE _
"N-NITRQSC-DIETHYLAMINE
TSANS-1.4-DICHLORO-2-PUTENE
ANILINE
•» !., CI TY: CJticof.r
STATE: NC
. .T.ii'^'cl-v-1 >^LL_3._(5HS?LVcD...-T3
-------
tf
j,03/35/37
I '
SA"PL£ AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
rPA-ESD.IJEG IV
, ATHENS GEORGIA
***:;:::: ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
-Ul US 4=i!=THY.LPHlNaL
ExTx'ACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, HISC
DATA ^E^Qf-TING S^?tT
JA r^R
SAMPLr NO.: 07C16S83
SAMPLE TYPE: G?OUN9WA
50UJ BSNZOIC ACID
10U 4-CHL090ANILINE
10U 2-METHYLNAPHTH4LENE
-.5 OUR ;._4 "":"_...„".
50UJ 2-NITSOANILINE
SOU 3-NITRQANILINE
10U DI3FMZOFURAN
SOU 4-mT°GANILIM-:
J • PROJEC.r_NC. • -tl-
i CITY: "crJCJ^
PROGRAM ELEMENT; RC;A
:FV:L.
STATE: NC
.'SAMPLE COLLECTION: ST>»RT DATE/TIK= 03/16/e?
I" SA^rLi. CCLLtCII3Mi_JS.Ilf D4.lJ/jr.LHc_JLO/.OJl/OJL
CCLLECTiS s
'S«MPLc REC'
') 0iQ'J"TTc ?I"CCIV':0 = R 0 M :
CAT:, /TINE 00/00/00 KEC'O BY:
CheMIST:
'ANALYTICAL KET43D:
•"CONTRACT
! H R :: M A r! K. :
: CtNTEC
SAMPLc L3G..V£^ItUEQ_£l
ft**P sKA RS S;.:;::;i:
ATA VERTFTFD p.Y; CHH
I ft:
I"
vi
,; ViLUH
VALUE
*MA-HPT AMiLYZETJ *N A I-INTERF 5 R ENC ES
=-.-N-PRESUCPTIvr EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
vK-ACrUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TQ o£ LPSS THAN VALUE GIVEN "
AL.T.4C7 Ufll—VALllr TS KlilQUM Tf) °F uJ^EAT_cR_tHAK_jLAHJF r.TVPN L
:>L)-yArt^IAL .VAS ANALYZED FO" 3UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER
THE c3Ti:-.AT£0 MINIMUM QUAiJTI T ATION LIMIT.
IS
-------
ft
ft
:v;"Ll: -N3 ANALYSIS yA.MAG?MF.N|T SYSTEM
= f>t.-cSC<,f!EG IV
iTHLf.S izOROIt
***** ANALYTICAL RESULT $*«**«
« v.
TI.'JG SMEET
_ /iATr*
SAMPLE \'C.t ;7C1
E TYPE:
_
C : NC
PROJECT NO.:_ST-2:5 ___
, SJJSfCE: C.IM-P-L KL f. CEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD
•STATION I.O.: v;;LL_4_CJQIii:.LVID- "LtTA
. ST3*f T STATION N3:
SAMPLE CDLLCCTION: STAPT DATF/TI^E 03/17/37
s A« E t Lcr L t i c u ja = STOP DATE/TIKE oo/o D / o .0.
SAhPLc
~ CHEMIST:
' ANALYTICAL I-'ETHOD:
!' CAST •>'-:•• 2~j*j "or
— CJNTRACT L i j 'j ^ A T rj •: i
-'E CO/OC/CO
:ECM:
?:-c'D BY:
C IMOP.G
: CEMTEC
4"0 . :
~ : KcMARK, :
. 0 ft T A_V_E_? I f.I.E. D...3 Y ?._C H H_
»! !? i ''f A ~ MA i\ K 3 'i; •'•:':
("hGLOI'i; TIMiS iXC-.^Ot:
",iY :•> '-'AY kCT "j; P^lSrHT
" ! S~N?C r
26,1984)
_ . ^- _, . ___ , ___
F03 V 5 U IF I TAT TON
26.1984)
_ I ' f. ... ... .;. ... :;; ;•; ;•; . . ;•; ;•; . ; :;. .;. ,;; :;: ;•. ;•; ;'; £ .•; ;•; {• % ff ff ff ff # -J; :J :,: ff % % £ * :;: tf If f; ff if * % f. ff * 1>
-------
^
— 4C
3C 1
£
r*^ —4
(/••if
•H T?
t-H-4
^-'. V»
i- r~
-*
C3 J-
^
*— « F*
21 *£
»--i J*
^
3! I-*
HI
f:
20
2*
-4^
&C
— *— 1
O.2
— 1
r-
I— « ^3
2 in
-H
ni
CJ
-H
*
'.-- m
z
c
u
03
rn
JO
t/>
_
.
.1 * .• :
"";,"
j. ., " j.
r-x i i»
f 1 in 1
OO— i<:
•-4 —••*-•* ri,
CC.'.-. y
T> X> )> 1-.
r~*— — 4c»
ry • n
"•C-Ct '
**t> <
[~c i- r-
C T'
— t t—tt '!
L/>1/1
;*3*-:;-
z?2<5
KSC T-X>
•a-d.TJ 1
' r> ^
OUC-l
era' oj>
m TI — <2
1-4 £»
i7>r~ < r~
rni/» r>j
-* m
-c "~ o -:;•
(~O»-<
•CC Tl 1
"" "O 2
^0">JW — *
•nurnin
-.:- -::•
o -::•
c> •:;
i" •: -
(. *•
— i ;-
• n t-
-;.- ;.
""" ;"
;.
1 .•
ff'.
-;;.
.;;.
«•.
•»
*!I*
;i"
•"•
•::•
-"•
%t-
-::-
<;•
.;*.
-•••
-:;-
•ii-
•I I*
-*J
•^
-*^
.;*.
-::-
•|>
i'.
-;;•
-j^
-:;•
-^
•jj.
« : l !
O 1
t-400
i: j-
TT
u
t-t'-i
r^ ^i
i i.O
(/i
p
m^
x o
o
H"M!
f~j ^
rr. i-
t" J ^
OLO
«-
1-4
tr« rn
•• o
o n
—4 1/1
Oi>
in— <
iO
-n
*s
vO*n
**i-H
^^ n
n
r»
^
-H
>-t
O
*"
i c.-:;-
X' t •;'
L_ .T;
L. »-Hl/1
^ •;;•
":•' T n -•;
j' 1^1 •"
-«•
n>
J- ^
-^ o
n.
^ O
- rrtf
"~ AJ .'}
T T 7-
L~J
C1
•<
n
zi
ri
ji
>^
71
L-3
j-»
i— i >
5>
<
2
_^
•Tl
U
-<
X
X
OC-t
-^—dn
JO AI
t x r:
-!-(•
• •
r~ r~
r^ r-rj
r>' u ' u
U Lj'J-
">» ? (*.'
c-*-
C^^ vj
-1.' Jlj 'J
!^r>
»-iCn/*
-„- ^, ^
OO'-T
^J t T3
•"-*"*
v> >•
O
o
m
^
—4
m
o
^
o
•^
^
.^
^
m
^
o
•
••
3
O
O
f»
cu
U1
I\J
t»0
ZX
-< »-•
-^(y>
r>»-
i>
r-
T-
fTl
_4
T
^
:T X-0
T*f~|i*
omo
nio
0
lu"1
c. -<
• • *•
C»L7
J>-o
^5
XC
-in.
.-.-(
rniii
X
0
o
OJO
o-n
T\
t—t
<
'r^
Tl
-no
"
• •
or> — »
-— f— |>,
1 ft' -4
r,o f.
LU» -*
~r* r>
r~r~ -»
n n i-
no i j
— IH
H-l-t
roa .T
/t t/i
-1-4
l_)^
-•jjo
-4
J>>»
-I-H
tun
>-«>-*
2 j£
nirn
OO
Ol*»
x*x
o>-*
O-J
XX
°"
& ^c
>-i •• ri
i_» P"
"" t? "
*•-* U "it
• (*>»••
O t_; —
• >3 f>
., c. ^j
1^
X r
r-
-t (*>
*~\ Cl
-, r,
n <
^ £
£ r
7 ^
j; tn
m ••
— |
I* *Z
r— f-^
"
!w
tn
r>
y
o
•
^
^
-J
Jj
^
•o
LJ
JU
*
n
r—
n
n
5
,,
•*'
0
j»
^
-•3
r
r»m
-4 •
r
O ^
0
M*
.>.
'Jl
O
i
r*
rn
_4
^
t)
01
..
o
o
c
^
o
z:
t>
oooo
C.CCC
c_c_c_c_
__
1 t-t 1 1
^m£S
/3fvlX)-O
rn fntf
0 N
to
X
o
V/1
X
-J
til
X,
-*
JD
^
O
-*r-
OO
xj-n
-»-O ^
— «— 4»-«
>l -*O
O^
10»
x r™
r*i ^
moo
-H»~4
t/t
3C
^
O
0000
cccc
AJC.JOC.
^
1 1 m
'n.Trf
1 IO-H
r-Tr-o
O-1W
o i»m
-or-
mz
zni
o
-S
. . . J
^' ->
t'
•9
1-
— ITI
O
-1 XI 1>
m 1 -<
txny»-« '
ot/>
(7>»
OITI J»
3DOZ
K« H^ C>
if < m
2
rn
z
-(
t/>
it ^
-*
m
^
c^m
Cl^ -
1—
*3 g
i •• •::•
.nc •::•
IN Z
r- r-
zo o
a
c »
Z rn
O in
C
z r-
:£ f>
m
-------
:-J-;?L£ AND ANALYSIS MANSGFMCNT SYSTEM
A T fl E 0 S " G E 0 •? G I A
03/05/oT
r ORGANIC ANALYSISi MISC
DATA St'PQSTING SH-ET
RESULTS
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
»
»
SA"Pl_: MO.: 07C1S591
PR.3JSCT ,NO..:..-£ In: __
" " ' ~.l : MINERAL H£
i I. o.:. KJ. . „
STiH2'l NO:
-1051 AJLE1.E HEJlIiL_&.C ?. «
FVEL.
STATE: NC
10'JJ"
10'JJ
SAMPLE TYPE: GBOONOWA 10UJ
.. . 10UJ_
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STS^T DITE/TII*E 03/17/87
" ;i::u\; STOP OATE/TI"£ OO/O^/OP
COLLECTS: ;-.
' > ~ >. t* L i. .? c C ' [
D A T 3 , / T I V, £ 00/00/00
RHC'O 5Y:
ANALYTICAL I-.iTHjfl:
"'*:. :" :3i3"
i"> -v, S*VPLF. N3:
ZcrSATC^YCa^GANiC):
CITRiCT Lic^iTKYCIICRSANIC:
SAMPLE NO.: M3QA853
CENTEC
SAKPLt -
^0_JT; HJLE.
HATA VFBIFTFn BY! CHH
f:-J'JALITY .CuNTR.TL I'OICATES THAT DATA A5E UNUSEABLE
f:-C;'-l?: JiiJ f--.\Y J'-i Jr'.MY .HO.T._S£_P.?£SJiHT .
H-^cSiVLlNG -JO -?Ei^.»LYSIS IS tlECFSSAPY ^0^ VERIFICATION
HOLDING TI,-1;« 5XC3;DE3C40 CFR 136,OCTC?E? 26.19SO
_10UJ_
10UJ
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ.
10UJ
10UJ
50'J?
10UJL_
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ_
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ
LOUJ.
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ
10'JJ.
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
101JJ_
10UJ
10UJ
10 U J
10UJ-
10UJ
10UJ
10UR
10UF
10UR
i::A-«V£PAG:: VALJ£ *NA-NOf ANALYZED *NA I-INTERCE RENC E S 10UR
«j-cSTIMATED V1LUE *M-P9ESU»PTIVE EVIDENCE OP PRESENCE OF MATERIAL 10UR
:;:K-tCTUiL VALU- IS KNOWN TO Sf. LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 10UJ
OU-MATc^IAL J^S ANALYZED F?P BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE ciflMATHU MIMMJN QU4NTITATION LIMIT.
:i::;::<::: ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
>'f THY U_M1THACRY LATE _
<,-HETHYL-2-PENTANONl
PY5IDIME
N-NITROSO-DIMETHYLAMINE
T.HYL..Hf TH.A£RrLAJ£ __ '
I-HEX4NGNE
2-BIC3LIME
N-NIT'CSO-METHYLETHYLAMINE
M3THYL METH4NESULF3*IATE_ __
N-NITROSO-DIETHYLAMINE
T>>AN$-lt£QNAM.IDE_
PENTACHLORONITR09ENZENE
P-DIMFTHYLAMINOAZaS?NZENE
4, 4'-METHYLENE3IS(2-CHLOROANILINE)
_3i3'--DIM£TMOXY2ENZIDINE_
7,12-OIMETHYL6ENZCA)ANTHRACENE
3-MFTHYLCH9LANTHRENE
N-NITR3SODI-N-PUTYLAMINE
DI3ENZO(A,E)PYRENE
2,6-DICHLOi?OPHEMOL
3,3'-DIMcTHYLBEMZIDINE
DIBENZO(A,H)PYRENE
OI-N-PROPYLNITROSAHINE
BENZYL ALCOHOL
2-J4E.THYI PHPKini
-------
b
. \
f~t'
i. >
E AND 4f;JLYi!S MANSGEMFNT SYSTEM
t*i-:f9,R?G IV
ATHSUS GrO^Gia
-: ' „ CITY : "c:nC3rr ' " ' STST?: NC
•ST4ii;>i i.j.: i;:L'._4. cPis_s:.LVEn ME'
_ COLL-JCTIO;.: START
i • S M ", p L.;_ C G_U L L C T I.l\ :__i_TJ P
IVC o3/i7/e7
I "" E OO/ J O./.O 0
"-= 00/00/0?
BY:
CISMIST:
'AM4LYTICAL J.rTHJS:
"IMJ'RG SAMPLE NO".: MO(JftES3
INOPC-iVK) : C?'-!TFC
"iAMFLi Lj;C-__ ViRIrlfD 3Y: WFP
V£,glf Jf T_J Ii_.CW
'C "*?Y ci\'Tf:L IfJCICATES THAT DATA
UNUSCAELC
_ . _
A'lu --iMNALYStS IS NECES'S'APY
EXCEC2:2(40 C<=R 1 3 6 , OCTC?-
VERIFICATION
p j t :::.;:::: :::'::.: ,:.::.:::'t 1::;:*.S*-":".!*:'::1:*******^*********::*-:**->S***
•vvvFO^T IJ rii.-l-Vv . .. .
„; >/A-4 VEf; AGI; V4LUF *N4-NQT A'-IALYZE'C
r
..............................
-TN TE Rr"= Rg " "
„, ;..-4-4V-r;Ab^ VALUt- *N4-NOT 4'-IALYZED *NAI-INTERr ERgN'C E'S f
- *J--JIJh*TED V-LUE <'M-Fi? = SU"IPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
^j ',-K-Ai.TUii. Vi'.UE IS KNOWN TO RF LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
. vU-^ATL^ItL ./AS"t'l"ALYZ£0 F3P ^IJT NOT~DE"TVc ffo. THE NUMBEFTS
Th; =STi:'ATr'J f'lNIMUK 1UANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
Si'l^LE 4ND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
= Pt-£SD,PEC- IV
A T ^ ? N S 5:IR5 I A
- C3/05/37
-XTK'ACTABL? ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
' DATA REP^RTIN1; SnEET
NO.: 37Cl
E TYPE: GROLINOWA
• PROJECT f!3.:
l. S'JU'Cc: fr:.~'
I CITY: CjiJCjX:
^C- "?4'-'_SL£KENT :.. RC3 A.
TSTC: NC
,"SA«PL: COLLiCTIpM: 3T4RT CATr/TIME 03/17/37
-;tLT ^;C':: r.'.T£,/TIME CO/OC/00
3Y:
ANALYTICAL .-l?
NO.:
'C'3MT"ACT
, RtMARK. :
' SA'-IPLE LOG
TsT=n HY: UPP
RESULTS
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10'JJ
_10UJ
1CUJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10L'J
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1CUJ
10UJ
10UJ
? OUJ
_J01JJ
10JJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
-laud
10UJ
lOUft
10'JJ
-10 UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
• I
•
'K-^UAL:TV CJ\T?;L INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
. . -_..
R-RcS/t'-'PLi'lii ^'JD * = «.4ft-LYSIS IS NSC^SSA^Y ^n? VERIFICATION
HQLOINS TIKcS CXC;EO=CCJE .
7,12-DIMETHYLBENZCA)ANTHRACENE
3--4ETHYLCHOLANTHRENF
N-NITROSOOI-N-BUTYLAMINE
DIBENZOCA,E)PYRFNE
2,6-UICHLORHPHEMOL
3t3'-DIHcTHYLBEMZIDINE
OIPEMZO(A,H)PYRENE
DI -U-PROPYLNIT ROSALINE
OENZYL ALCOHOL
-------
•
-N ; 08/05/37
SA'-1PLF. AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
LPA-E$D,PeG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
E*#*
\
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
10UR_ 4-M5_THYL_PHENOL_
TOT).
10UR
10UJ
SOUR
'50 UJ"
50UJ
10UJ
_30UJ
4-CHLOROANILINE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2 4 5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
3-NITROANILINE
DIBENZQFURAN
_4-NITROANILJ_NE
F R 0 J c C_T_il 0 . :_ i7-326 PROGRAM SLF.KENT: BCRA
, S003C:: HIMSRAL
-------
• V
~
: AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ED«-?s:',srG iv
ATHENS GEORGIA
-» ( , Od/05/i7
•'iC"II__L'
9 '•'.
', • P R 0 J p C T N C . : ij 7_r ' 2_4
. SJ'JiJCE: M ,'i'R-L "^ t OiV:L.
t: C:TT: cjMCur.:
rXTF.ACTAP.LS ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA "EPjOTING SHEET
tf ft T F£
NO.: 67C16SS4
SAMPLE TYPE:
ELEKfNT; RCRA
•STATION I.:.:
. i T j ^ ; T S T - T i j ;
STATE: NC
<-_t CUJS?i,ViD_IJ|LI»JJ
i"54.UPLc_CCLLLC.
:.'COLLECT;?
START DATE/TI'-1,: 03/17/37
r: D PIQUHTTE P =
C: PATEt/TI'-IH 01/00/00
:ROM:
OEC'D 2Y:
CHHMIST:
l'ANALYTICAL METHOD:
',,CAS£ NT.: 2253
SAMPLE NO: D
SJTA7JOR"5
IOU PYRIDINE
IOU N-NITROSO-DIMETHYLAMINE
IOU ETHYL METHACRYLATE
IOU2-HHXIUON6 " "
2-PICOLINE
IOU
IOU
_1QU_
IOU
IOU
IOU
,.iou_
IOU
6J
IOU
10U_
IOU
ICiJ
SOUR
N-MT'3^0-METHYLETHYLAMINE
METHYL ••IETHANESULeONATE
N-MITROSO-DIEThYLANIN=
TRANS-l,4-OICHLORO-2-BUTENE
ANILINE
_PENTACHLQROETHANE
f!-NITRCSOMCOPHOLINE
ACET^PHFNONE
D-TOLUIiMNE
10U
10UJ
10U
A,A-DIMETHYLPHE'4cTHYLAMINE
_H E X A C HLOROPROPENi_
SAF^'JLE
1,2,'V,5-TETRACHLOR03ENZENE
IOU
iou
10U
_1DUJ_
10UJ
10UR
IOU
10U.._
IOU
IOU
10UJ
10U _
IOU
10U
IOU
.
M-OINITP09EMZEN6
4-M ETHYL- 2-NITROANILINE
PENTACHLOROBENZENE
J-NAPHTHYL,AMINE
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
5-NITRO-O-TQLUIOINE
1 ,2-niPHENYLHYCRAZINE
"CIPHCNYLA'IINE Cl)"
PHENACETIN
1-AMINOBIPHENYL
PR ON AC IDE
, ! «4-Ai/L:*AJc VALJE «NA-NlT ANALYZED
• *J-cSrif-'.AT£C VIL.'JE «N-P?ESUI*PTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
'• *K-ACTL)AL VALU; IS KNOWN TO 5E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L_u_#l.-ACTUiL VAL1Ji_JS_XWQHM_TO_eE_GREATER .THAN VALUE GIVEN ._• .'
«U-"1ATL»IAL .!AS ANALYZED F3R "UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
I THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM OUAflTITATION LIMIT.
.
IOU
IOU
10UR
_10UR_
10UR
10UR
1 0 0 U R
_50UR
10UP
10UR
IOU
_1.0UR
PfNTACHLORONITROBENZEME
P-DIMETHYLAMINOAZOSENZENE
4,4'-M;THYLENEBIS<2-CHLOROANIUINE)
.3t.2'-DIN:ThOXYe=NZIDINf: _ __
7,1?-DIMETHYLRENZCA)ANTHRACENE
3-MFTHYLCHOLANTHRENE
N-NITROSODI-N-BUTYLAMINE
2,3-DICHLQRnPHEMOL
3,3'-OIMETHYLBENZIDINE
_ __
DI8ENZOCA,H)PYRENE
DI-N-PROPYLNITROSAMINE
3ENZYL ALCOHOL
-------
E ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT STSTFM
£PA-ESO,REG IV
GEORGIA
-». oa/of/a7
SXTF(ACTASL= ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA RE"0"TING S»FET
E •!£).: 57C163S4
CONTINUED
SAMPLE TYPE: 5POUN3WA
\
*<:«:)«ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
10UR _ 4-METHYLPHENOL
~50UJ - BENTOTC"ACrD
10U 4-CHLOROANILINE
10U 2-VTHYLNAPHTHALENE
..OUR _ 2 4 5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
~50UJ -
SOU
10U
SOUR
2-NITPDANILINE
3-NITR3ANILINE
4-NIT90ANILINE
:T_NJ.: 57-225
I ., SOUK:: (••INT7AL R; i.
1 • CITY : CJ'4C2«U
ELEMENT:
ST1TC: NC
S T A r I c -i i. j.:
•IV; 03/17/37
i.-:.v' :_-iJ.T£ iJLTs /T JMr._00/J 0 /00_
'•• F- L c
•^ !
: • S ;
-> "CHEMIST:
OAT^t/TI.VE GO/00/01
FROM:
P?C'D BY:
= m.: :ji
cuvrkicr Hr.f,r
CJMTRfcCT Ltb:>
G SAMPLE NO: c
:
C): CCNTEC
SAMPL? NO.: MDQA826
'•• SAMPLE. LQC. VEKTFI?Q HY; UPP
DATA VgoiFIF
• YJ_CHiL
( ..-•jyALlTY_CJNTR3L INDICATES THAT DATA A3? UNUSEABLE
'rLlNli
. _
R:AN4LYSIS IS UECrSSAPr" FOR VERIFICATION
_ . ... . ^_
'.. yA-M/L'nAOE VALUE *NA-UOT i'J/>LYZEO =::NA I-INTERFERENCES
I, vJ-cSTIMATiJ -/JL'J= *fl-P?ESUMDTl Vfc EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
VaLUi IS KNOWN TO SE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
"~ ~" "
•I *LrACTUAUV^LlJi._IS-JUi2i<:t_ia_££..G3£A.I£Jl_THAN_VLAL.U£_fiIVEN
|. «U-i"ATi*iaL WHS ANALYZED FC^ iiJT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMEER IS
~ . THc CSTir-UTED MINIMUM QUANTITA TION LIMIT.
VJ.
-------
I I
Si-:?L- «NO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E°A-rSD,RrG IV
ftThfl.S GEORGIA
EX7«;.ACTA»Lr ORGANIC ANALYSIS, HISC
DATA REPUTING SHtET
S4MPLT. NO.: S7C16593
SAMPLE TYPE: GPQ'JNDWA
• PROJECT NO. :
„ SOiKCc": ^l:,-.-
CITY: CuiJCCXj
: RCRA
STATE:
-, :.L-.: '.r-LL SA (Dissolve ..?.
••Sh-'lPLt CGLLLCTin: STtPT OATJ/Tl'if 03/13/87
• S AM?L i_CC L L E CJJL'J.J.: SJ.P P C * IJL/JJJL-_£ 9 / 0 0_/ 0 < i ••: A ^ K :
•• SAv,PLs_ UC_V;RIFr;7 jy: WFP OJ.TA_V_E.5IP1FJJ_E.YJ_CHH
" P"-;UAL:TYJC"U';T^JL "!0TcsT£t T^ST D^TA A?E UNUSEABLE
-p--j'^)U'o i-'AY :-' "-'-I NOT a; ?R;5C'1T .
, k-«;S V^IPLI JG -'.'u -l-HITROSOP¥RftOL"IOTTir
N-NIT50SCMQRPHOLINE
ACETGPHrNONE
G-TOLUIOINE
"l,2-DI3POMO-TFt __
N-NITROSOPIPERIDINE
A,A-OI«1ETHYLPHENcTHYLAHINE
l.Z.'f.S-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
1 .4-NAOHTHOQUINONE
4-METHYL-2-NITROANILINE
PENTACHLOROBENZENE
1-NAPHTHYLAIfINE
2,3,<.,6-TETRftCHLOROPHENOU
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIOINE
1 ,2-niPHENYLHYDRAZINE
OIPHENYLAMINE (1)
PHET'ACETIN
^,-AMIMOBIPHENYL
PENTACHLORONITR03=NrFNl
P-QI.'^THYLAMINOaZOBENZENE
<,, 4'-••1ETHYLENE3ISC2-CHLOROANILINE)
^,3 -;i'tiin JAir^iHf-ivii-^r. .
7,12-OIMFTHYL8ENZ(A)ANTHRACENE
3-M£THYLCHOLANTHRENc
N-NITROSODI-N-BUTYLAMINE
2,6-LICHLOROPHENOL
3,3'-OI*1i:THYLSEMZIDINE
"OI9ENZOCA,H)PYRENE
DI-N-PROPYLNITROSAMINE
BENZYL ALCOHOL
THE t
MINIMUM ;IJANTITATION LIMIT
-------
* 4NP i.'JSLYSI? MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
iDA-.SD,R£G IV
ATHFN3 GEORGIA
5XTRACT46LE n»GANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DMA REPORTING Sn;ET
W J T c R
SAMPLE NO.: 37C16593
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
10UJ 4-MFTHYLPHENCL _
'50 UJ - BFNn-T.C~A~CT.TJ ---
10UR 4-CHLOROANILINE
10UJ 2-METHYLtlf"PHTHALENE
50UJ 2 4 5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
"50UJ - '
SOU"
10UJ
50UR _ t-NITROANILINE
2-NTTtrOHNIL'INE
3-NITROANILINE
P R 3 J : C T_N 0 ..: fl 7- 326 PROGRAMELEMENT.:._ RCR«_.
'CITY! CONCORD ~ w STAT;: NC
STORiT STATION Vj: ''" "
'SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DAT^/TIW. 03/19/87
• 3 A ,'1 p. L E_C_ a L LIC T 1 riJ: „. T J T. fi A_T ^ / J. L'-l L_OjB /O a/ 0 9 _
?=C=lveP
JO/OO/03
< r c' C BY:
"ANALYTICAL /. £ i
,,CAS: NJ.: 2..?? J^C- SAMPLE N3: 0
•* • C J M T S A C T L A 3 J -' A T -.V Y C 0 * & A N I C ) :
."C'iJTft'.T L4; J-;,7 J-'YC IfJ"";-NIC) : CJ'ITEC
:>10PG SAVPLE NO.: MOOA855
k ; < i R X :
j •- S A M P L fc_ L at .. V H Z I C
SY;
.CATS ,
CRH_
::::.: .= R E M i < K S =.= : •••
R-.'JiLlTt CU'!
I'4CICAT = S T*A7 DATA
> Y
UNUSEA6LE
_. ..-_ _______ . _________
AMJ •! E A '-I fl L Y S I S T5 NEC^SSA't "DR V =/? 1 = 1C AT I 3N
^a 1 36 ,
. . _ __ _____ ___
,:A-fiv;r-£i..E V-LJ? ' ~*NA-iNCT AN3 L'Y"Z E." " =:=N A I-I NT ERFE R'FNC E S"
*J-ESTI."AT;1> V^LU? *i<-PRE SUMPT 1 VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
- ACT UAL VtL'JE IS KNOWN TO 2 E LESS THAN VSLUE GIVEN
A C T L1 -1
I *K-
*t-
( *iJ-
I" i
Tnc h
_ _ _____. _ .. .....
'SS A\ALY2£D =OR HUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
' ^U*: .U4NTITATION LI",IT.
-------
SV-1PLC AND ANALYSIS NANl'iEM'NT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHfNS r,
-> 03/05/37
FX7R>CTA?Lc DSC-JUIC ANALYSIS, HISC
' C9TA SEPE-fTI'JG SHEET
E NO.: S7C16536
SAMPLE TYPE: GFOUNOWA
RESULTS
JOUJ _
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ _
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
i: L : :i i ti n 4 L •'. i c E \
•fc,..ClfY: CDNCOr.0
" STATIQ.I i.:.:. /iCL'-.r
',STORET STjTIGf. Jj:
_EX^iBAK_.= L=
'. RCtft,
STAT5: NC
"SAMPLE CCLLECTION: START DATF/TIHE 03/17/37
rT'- -Yt C "AJU-TT6 ^•E
i: ^cC'C: t-»Tc,/T!v,£ 00/00/00
FROM:
RSC'O SY:
CMcMIST:
ANALYTICAL .-.ETH
.. CASt "43.:
:. .CC'lTRACT
.REMARK:
i< E "i A P. ^ :
]'• SAMPLE .LOG
*'>«"
^ _
SAMPLE HO: C
INQSG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA846
VERTFTFn
vv
CU-JT?:L INOICATCS THAT DATA ARE UN'JSEABLE
! HCLOINu ril-1.:!
CFR 136,3CT09£?
««<:«« ANALTtiCAL RESULTS*****
INI UG/L COMPOUND NAME
«ETHYL_METHAC«!Yl.ATE, _
4-METHYL^Z-PENTANQN t
PYRIDIMF:
N-NITROSO-DI1ETHYLAMINE
£THYL METHACRYLATE __ __ _ .
Vj
>
2-PICCLINE
N-NI TPOS 0-H ETHYL ETHYL AM IN E
.
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
-10UJ
10IJJ
10UJ
10UJ
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ
50UR
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
IOUJ
10UJ
IOUJ
-IOUJ
IOUJ
IOUJ
10UJ
..IOUJ
IOUJ
IOUJ
IOUJ
-1QUJ
IOUJ
IOUJ
IOUJ
.IOUJ
IOUJ
IOUJ
10UR
-jous
10U3
10UR
100UR
~^"NA^»rdf~V1\iACYZf tf "*NA I-INTERFERENCES
f..N-P?cSUMPTIVc EVIDENCE Oe PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
:5K-ACfUAL~VALUi~IS KNOWN TQ fl= L=SS THAN VALUE GIVEN
THE CSTIMiTcJ MINIMUM OUANTITATI3N LIMIT.
NUMBER IS
_
10UR
10UR
IOUJ
_10UJ
..
N-NITROSO-OIETHYLAMIME
T?ANS-l,4-OICHLORO-2-BUTENE
ANILINE
P.£NTACHLOME-Thft,NE __
N-NITR3SOPYRRCLIDINE
N-NITR^SOMDRPHOLINE
ACETOPHENONE
__ , ___ . ___
1 ,2-DI?20MO-3-CHLOR3PROPANE
N-NITROSOPIPERIDIfJE
A,A-OIM=THYLPHcNETHYLAHINE
_HEXftCHLORQPROPE!l£ _ .
SAFROLE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
ISOSAFRCLE
1 ,4-NA?HTHQQUINO\E_ _
M-DINITROBENZENE
4-METHYL-2-MITROANILINE
PENTttCHLC?OBEMZENE
l-NAPHTHYLJlMIIi£ _ ,
2-N«PHTHYLA^INE
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIDINE
1 ,2-DIPH£NYLHYDt?AZ.IN£ _
OIPHENYLAMINE (1)
PhENACETIN
4-AMINOBIPHENYL
PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE
P-aiMCTHYLAMINOaZOBENZENE
4, 4'-'1ETHYLENEPIS(2-CHLORO ANILINE)
-3t3*.-QIMETHQXYBSNlIDINE __________
7fl2-OIMETHYL8ENZC«)ANTH RACEME
3-METHYLCHOLANTHRENE
N-NITRQSOOI-N-3UTYLAMINE
_Dia£NZ.QCA.JJPYR5NE __ ! - -
DI3ENZQ(A,E)PYRENE
2,5-OICHLOROPHEMOL
3,3'-DIMETHYLBEN2IOINE
_ .. _____ _
DI9ENZO(A,H)PYRENE
DI-N-PROPYLNITROSAMINE
3EN7YL ALCOHOL
-------
I
• V
£ AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPt-FSD.REG IV
ATH?r-lS
\
«****flNSLYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND NAME
•x ; \ 09/05/b7
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
RESULTS IN: UG/L
"iou J till!a I ctjf? 6
OUR
4-CHLOROANILINE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
V\
• PROJECT_aQ..JL-£7-326
» SJUrtCt: MINL-RAL ^5
, I,, CITY : CONCORD
;" SlAriOiL-1.1. :__JjiLL_
i .. S7G25T STATIJrl fl 3:
I
'"SAMPLE COLLECTION: START
|"SAJ1P.LE_C3L-LEC-LI_LU
• j"COLLECTED ;Y: L P42UETJJ
"ANALYTICAL r-.- £ T H 3;
-CASE .NT.: 2"3i'i":
„ C J J T X 4 C T L <• h J .". i T 1
Cu'HSACr L - E ? K A T .
.. atrfASiC
, R c M A \' K. :
S AMP L i-LO&_V-E 115 r £ 2_£Jr_^-Ur P_
DATA REPORT
TNG SHFET 1UUJ <-ne i n luiiMr" i nwuciit
i.'^UJ'iL.t.1 Crtiil ^/C..TOTfWlnDTDWPWni
WAJ^, . SOUJ 2-NITR3ANILINE
SOUR 3-NITROANILINE
MPLF MO.: S7C1S596 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA 10UJ DI BEN ZQFURA N
CONTINUED SOIIn 4-NIT KUAN IL Lnt .... _ — — — —
IponrpoM ci
t DEVEL.
STATF:
START 04TE/TIMH
UETTE Rf:C
ZMFkiTfCCpl — —
NC
03/17/87 .-••.-•;•
00/')3-/nn — — — ~— ~ — ~~* '
E1VED FKD^:
REC'O BY:
i
s 1 1-1 P L E NT: D
(OSGANIC):
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOCA846
NTEC
__ — —__ — — — — • — • • — — -— — — — • — • • • " ~ i
DATA VE"IFI'D pv- rm
KIT»:L IUCKATHS THCT DATA ARE UUUSEABLE
" K.-C3KPUJM— flit itt J'.iY-^-T it—PE-CL'JT •
,. rt-;;tS-'-iPLIN3 ATJ-J ^ANALYSIS IS HECESSA'Y FOR VERIFICATION
HGLDIN& TIMci -. XCEEDEOCtO CFR 136,OCTQEHP 26,1984)
i- :.:i::;:rajT/iCT£:i:::^-J.
• ' "VALUE
NA-UOT A'ULYZEC
*N A I-INTERFERENC ES
**-3V£*;iGc VALUE :::NA-Mar A-ltLTifci: -f^A I-IN I t«rcncni.co .,_„-.
*;j-ESTI.'--.lT = Q VALUS *N-??ESUMP TI Vfc EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-«CTUAL V«LU£ IS KNOWN TO ?.c LFSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
—tL^iCIUAL- Vl\ "- "^ KNnuN Tfl ?.r- nggAT^g T_HAKLJLAJ-U£—GJLV-E-tl :
SU-'-IATE^IAL '»'AS ANALYZtO FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE- f-4TI.X«TfcC MINIMUM OUA\TITATION LIMIT.
-------
ii-'lT'LT' A'JC ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
=PA-:SPtRrG IV
A T h = N S '»E1.? GI A
f~.'
•* • OS/OS/:;?
EXT^ACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSTS, HISC
DATA 'EPOSTING S^ET
SAMPLE NO.: 57C165B9
TYPE: 3LKHA
P_S_CL£LOA!1_ .ELEMENT ;_JlCaA.
t OEV5L.
STAT=: NC
e'«a j EC.T_iiQ ..:_a 1-2
, S 0 U 5 C i : K IM c ? A L
CITY: C'j'iccKc:
•STATION.i.D.; riEi
, S T 0 R = T S T A T 1 3 IN N3:
'SAMPLE CCLLtCTin-j; START DATS/TIMS 03/17/37
• SAMPLc. CCLLcCTI J.';l__SL2P D4J.;/Tja£_0.0/00/oa.
- i COLLECT;:-
Y : 1 ^AjU£TTE -JCCEIVE[I
':: DiT5,/TI'-:£ 01/30/00
REC'u 3Y!
C H 5 "I I S T :
. " ANALYTICAL KETH3C:
" 2TV; 5Tf,
».2:-
!'v-JjML!TY CiTIT?:1. INDICATES THAT DATA ARF UNUSEABLE
i-';-;j-,FJu:iJ :nt .JK.YAY ^:2i .22_ PRESENT .
, K-<;SA,''PL;NO ''ID } f: - US L YS I S IS f^CFSSARY FOR VERIFICATION
)' H3LDING TIMES r XC." C JC uC 40 CFS 1 36 , SCTObEB 2«,1984)
* * * * * * *
I.. i"'''' « A - A V £ i; A i i ' V A I'O'{ *N"A^N"0 f~A N a C 7Z fD W A I-IN TERF'ERFNCFS "
! i *J-=SriM«TiC VALUf *H-P?ESUMPTJvt EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
:.:K-ACTL'AL Vai.'J: IS KN?HN TO *,'. LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
*LTACTUAI VAi.lJL_IS-J(JiiawliLJ-3_aE_Gi<£AT£8_THA,N- VA.LUE._GIV£N. u.
VU-«ATfRIAL WaS ANALYZES FH» P-UT MOT DETECTED. THE NUMPER IS
THE ESTiiVtTi-O VINIMUM QUANTIT4TION LIMIT.
RESULT!
_10UJ _
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ _
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ __
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ __
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
..10 JJ _
10UJ
10UJ
SOUR
_10UJ _
10UJ
10UJ
IQUJ
_10'JJ _
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ _
1CUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10 UJ __
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ _
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_IOUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UR
_LOUR
10UR
10UR
100UR
** ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN! UG/L COMPOUND NAME
-METHYL MEIMACRYLATE.
4-M"tTHYT-2-PENTaNONc
PYRIDINE
N-NITROSO-DIMETHYLAMINE
.
2-HEX ANCNE
2-PICOLINE-
N-NITROSQrflETHYLETHYLAMINE
'-15THYL METHANESULCONATE __
N-NITROSO-DIETHYLAMINE
T"ANS-lt4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
ANILINE
'ENTACHLQROETaANE_
N-NIT9CSOPYRROLIDINE
N-NITROSO,VORPHOLINE
ACSTQPHEt.'0:4E
_C-TDLUICiri£ ____ ____
l,2-DIbROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
N-NITROSQPIPERIOINE
A,A-OIME=THYLPHE»JtTHYLAMINE
_HEXACHL'JRQPRQPcME ____
1,2,A,5-TETRACHLOP09EMZENE
ISOSA=ROLE
_J ,4-NHPHTHQQUINQNE
H-OIMTR09ENZENE
4-MHTHYL-2-NITROANILINE
PENTACHLOROBENZEHE
_1-NAP>1TWYLA'1IME
2-kIA?HTMYLA"INE
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
5-MTRO-C-TOLUIOINE
..1 ,2-CIPHE'JYLHYORAZiNE
CIPHENYLAHINE CD
PHEM4CETIN
4-AMINOSIPHENYL
PENTHCHLOPOMTROBENZENE
P-OIMETHYUAMINOAZOBENZENS
4, 4'- "1ETHYLENE9ISC2-CHLORO ANILINE)
_3f3.'-rDINETHQX.YBENZIOINE
7,12-OIMETHYL8ENZ(A)ANTHRACENE
3-^lETHYLCHOLANTriRENE
N-MITROSOOI-N-BUTYLAMINE
-DI3ENZa.(At.J3PJfRf Nc
CIBFNZOCA.E5PYPFNE
2.6-3ICHLOROPHEMOL
3f3'-niMETHYLBENlIDINE
,
10UR
10UR
10UJ
_. ____
DI3ENZQCA,H)PYRENE
CI-N-PROPYLNITR3SAMINE
BENZYL ALCOHOL
-------
E AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E=>A-iSD,RK- IV
GEORGIA
03/05/37
:**ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS
_101
50UJ
10UR
10UJ
_50'J
50UJ
SOUR
10UJ
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
4 -.15 T"ILEP EN.Q L
BENZOIC ACID
4-CHLORC1AMLINE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
^ 5-TRICHLQRDPJ!fMfli
2-NITROANILINE
2-MTROANILINE
DI5ENZOFURAN
PROJECT NC.:.
SJlKCi: i-'i'liR
CITY : :j \icoi.::
1. 3.:
r.?25 ____ PR3J5?AM_£LU1!N.IJ__R.CSA_
H1- 1 OEVEL.
STATE: we
'SAMPLE CJLLLCTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/37
• SAMPLE CCLL:CTiaN:._STOJ? OATi/IJMfc _.Ofl/OQ/ QO
COLL = CT£D JY: 0 PATUTTTE •'"CEIVEO c R 0 M :
$ A ', P L E 31-C'C.: CATc,/T:;'E U 0/00/0" R : C ' C 5Yi
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL
,CAS = JJ.: 2263 J'
-------
A
<•%
r
->
t
i '
*i°
i
•» ','
"* i ,
j
t
\ '
i
»
»
1
«* I
t
/•
.V
Od/05/d7
iOU^Ci: ••'Mi*-
Cirf: corJCtur
STA T I3'.l .I.u.i.-
iMSeT STATij'J
SAMPLE COLLECT
SAH?L£_C2LLEC.T
COLLECT.3 .'Y:
S. A M P L L X r C ' L :
C rt e M I i T :
ANALYTICAL 1* r T
case -o.: ;2^3
CLm^Cr LAs3j
k e "i >* K n. :
SAMPLE LOG -Vi-t
(i'-lJALTTY cVlT
1-C J -V _'J .- . " f
P-*; SAMPLING i
HoLCIWG TIMdS
,:,= ,,,:,,:,:,:,:,,
Si.'PLE A'O ANALYSIS KANSGEHENT SYSTEM
TXTRACTA3LE 0?GSVIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA RlP:rTIUG SHEET
Slf-'rL1 NC.: STCloSiS SAMPLE TYPE: SLKWA
L <:- t JEVEL.
ST»T=: NC
ID'i: START DATE/TIME 03/17/S7
>~ °aCU = TT= k'CriVE? =0^11:
5,iTr,/TIKE 00/00/00 ?EC'D EY:
HOD:
3»G sat'.PLF NO: o :NO?G SAMPLE NO.: MOQASSO
4T05Y(35GAMiCJ:
- JL !ir:C4TCS THAT D5TA A?E UNUSEABLE
'1C J-S'ULYSIS IS N':C?SSA»Y FOR VERIFICATION
ExCCCLiiGC^O CrR 13S.QCTO'5EP 26,1984)
ft:-:rt:-: :•:?.-***«*«:•!«•!•.***** ******««**-::*I!">*******>!«**»«***ft
,' SA-J,/! rMG- ' VALU- ::=riA-N3T ANALYZED ^NAI-IMTERFERENCE^
'.O-cSTI-'AT-ID ViLUE «N-PrESUM°TIV£ EVIDENCE O^ PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
:X-ACTUiL VALU5 IS KNUW1 TC j§ LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
" VTME ESTIX/;
-43 4,'JALYZtD FOR 1UT riOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
TC-D 1INICUH OUANTITATION LIMIT.
\
RESULTS
IOU
10U
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
50UR
i nu
IOU
10'JJ
IOU
inn i
IOU
IOU
IOU
j nijj
10UJ
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
10UJ
IOU
IOU
IOU
1CU
1 nu i
IOU
IOU
10UR
10 us
10UR
10UR
1 0 0 U R
sous
10UR
10UR
10UJ
1011.1
/ *'
— ' "\
««««*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
_JJli.T.H.yL_iJ£lilACRYLATE . . . — . — <
4-METHYL-2-PENT4NOHE >
PYRIOINE
N-NIT^OSO-DIMETHYLAMINE
cTHYL-.METHA-C.RYI ATE — —
2-Hr/ANONE
7-PIC2LINE
'1CTHYL ^ETH^NF SIH DONATE
N-NltROSO-DIETHYLAMINF
TRANS-l,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
ANILINE
PPNTACHLOPJJFTHANF
N-NITRQSOPYRROLIOINE
ACETOPHENONE
D-TTI"ir-"E - - -
l,2-CIBPQHO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
N-NITROSOPIPERiniNE
4,A-OIMFTHYLPHEMFTHYLAMINE
SAFRCLE
1,2,4, 5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
H-OINITROBENZENC
4 -ME THYL-2-NITRO ANILINE
1-NAPHTHYLA1INF
2-NA"HTHYLAPINE
2 ,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
5-NITPO-O-TOLUIOINE
_1,2-PI?HFHYI HY^atTTNF ___
DIPHENYLAMINE (1) i
PHSNACETIN
4-AMINQ6IPHENYL
PENTACrtLQRQNITROBENZENE
P-CIMcTHYLAMINOAZOBENZENE
4,4'-METHYLENFBISC2-CHLOROANILINE>
3>3" OIK1ETHDXY9ENZIDINF
7,12-5iMitMYLBENZCA)ANTHRACENE
3-METHYLCHOLANTHRFNE
N-NITROSODI-N-eUTYLAMINE
DIEENZ.DCA,J)PYRFNF : : 1
DI3ENZOCA.E5PYRENE
2,6-DICHLOROPHENOL
3,3'-OIMETHYLBENZIDINE
KCTMAPYRTI.EMF , - -- -
biEENZOCA ,H)PYRENE
DI-N-PROPYLNITROSAMIN6
3ENZYL ALCOHOL
s -,-- . 1 ; . — —
-------
k I
«•
r.
^J. yj
V* X."
.J Z
o
io o
UJ Z
or ID
O
-J 0-_l
< no
r • •
o
UJZ
ZUJ
oil
-JO.
wt-OZZ Z
M SJSwatx.jjSljj
-J _it O .j or <* «a u • ft
& U.' O
IZ-cruj
•O
»MOOtX>
'-rtuix
X 1 'U
_j- UJ
Z
Z W
Ol-m>
^ v«
•3 C"> 2
O ft.
Or Ul
_Jt—
1-
x
111
*M mo **
^OOZ3
oooo
\Ti LA r-lLT
i
2
0,
'^» °°
».-.
*-•
O
si c
C£
Z
UJ
jr
Ul
u
t^-O 5"
'.O u I ^
"r-
u v.<
_J
a
rH
S
«a aro f^:cr o
I-] XX U
r., ^o r,
X X, ut
O a r«-t
*" U^ ^Cl H-I
y ^ J lu
"' r-t :-.J"j u (-1
t— t/i »-4»^ it C>
«"* V* f— *— j X
*~ **1 ^x 0 !
t/i r~i u»uj c
. ^ SSj S
— 1 ^ QCj O
C ^ 11 - r i
0
Ul
I—
nc •«
•* n •-*
X «j,f»
u| ••'- -u rv i'
"1''" <^y "r-"" n *~ n C '"""' '"1 -*" *"'
<:"?> J" !J^ ".' ' - ; v.\ H iJS'^ri1
i^* ^ .Ht- 00 C>' ' ^t . ""^ ° "' J''"
"'""" ^,-° 00| ^'Jl- J'1^ .'-'~ '-• '"-^^
».
^J.
_j
f-H
oe
UJ
5
jr
-::- lulu.
-
in
n
tt-
-"• k.>O |iu
V- |Uj UJ UJ ^
it"
$;-
•IS
-;j
^.
f
„••.
.;;-
.;;-
5?
oco ^r?
tu^r znz
U_U>IJJO|
O"i/1> JUJ
UJU'HHuJx
*•«• O' tD r^^»
t— iO * luj
^ *t S,'^
•i:- o x!u - »—
UJ *J UJ £.
o x: crta f-«
c.> >-.»-
•::• >-ai.uo;~^.
•!«• 1*^ H- LLJ UJ t, iV—
•I I1 nc^ i-r^ o_fu -i^-J ^-J ^^- l;r ^ cfD'-»jtn . •; 'u ::-^> :;--::-
" O
"5"* ^~Io 5>i/> u^i/i 55 ;00-^ f°t» S "»--iri?
if ?
•::-
• ^ < f ( (
< '.:_'_.'J_L-"_= ' •-•.±-1_^« ^>
r A A i i i
-------
5A--1PLG AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
tTH?NS GEORGIA
— Od/05/37
EXT*ACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA PEPC'TTNG ShCET
V, « T F R
Say.PLE NO.: 87Clt587
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
'• • P K 0 J SC T_NO . :_5 7-J C 6 PROGRAM H5flENT: PCRA
.,. S 3 U 3 C c : M I N ; R J L - ; (. OEV E L .
..CITT: COMICS? STATE: NIC
.. STCMET STAT::;J Nj:""""~"*"" " ~~"
:"SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIKE 03/11/87
I • SAMPL£..C5LLi;CII.Jj1'Ji_S.T2£ DATS/TIUS QO/OC/00
COLLECTED lY: C PJ3UETTE RECEIVED
ii-:PLc «. = C'u: L'ftTE ,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
~ ! CHEMIST:
;"ANALYTICAL METHOD:
...CUSE N:.: 2363 ur?o SAMPLE NO: : INCRG SAMPLE NO.: MOQAB*?
• "CJ'NTRACT LAbORtT3!«YCiNOf!G«NiC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK.:
'SAMPLE LOG vrjIFT&E BY: WFP DATA VEPIFIgD BY; CHH
•R-VJALITY CCNT^JL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEASLE
•K-Ca'-IP:u.'ii).Mir._3.<_MAr_5lDT_iS_-P.RiS:'lt____ ,
. R-k£SAVPLING «ND R EA.'IALYS I SIS tlFCESSA^Y FOR VERIFICATION
HOLDING TIKES fcXC6EDECC40 CFR 136,OCTOSER 26,1984)
J,. ' ' '«A-aVl -
-------
r
i
SA.tpL: AMD ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E°4-i:SC,REG IV
1 ATHENS GE3RGIA
t \
f. '
,08/05/37 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA REPORTING S-lEET
1 • W A T c R
'! SAMPLE NO.: 37C16587 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
- - .- CONTTNUED
1
! • PROJ£CI_NQ.L &7-_32fi PROGRAM FLF.MFNT: RCRA
..SJUKLL! MITRAL Re t OEV?L.
., CITY : C3«C'JI<3 STAT^: NC
! ST.ATIO;i.I.D.: TRIP. -4:U;TT£ ^-CcIVrP FROM:
'^ 5AMPL£_F.EC ': : ri*:,/T:i'= 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
^CHEMIST:
i-iNALTTICiLKETHDo: • ,!-.. ' . ' |
"CONTRACT LAa3i<173-;Y(f'Jj3G*\lIC}S CENTEC
:. K £ M A ' K :
'• SAMPJ-£_L.OG _VE.RIFI = D 3Y: we? HATA VrPIFICD BY: THH
"ft-'iUftLlTY^CONTBCL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
• R-RsSA.;?Li"IG ANU REUNtLYSIS !S NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
^hOLDI.No TIKES bXC = E&EB(
-------
/ ...•'•£*'- : "^ ••*.:;'•.
' V
S-'-'PLE AND AV:LVSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-CSP.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
-* I . Od/05/?7
?XTRACTt?LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA REPORTING SHFET
SAMPLE NO.: 67C16581
SAPPLE TYPF: PUMP8LK
PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
I ' P£.3 J ECT NC.; 87-326
LsjvHCe: M:\=*«L -•: c orviL.
>;,,CIT*: C3NCDO STATC: NC
3TATI3-J ;.C..: aJ'-'J -LANK (DISSOLVED METAL)
••'••• T s'TiK^N '-n:
'SAMPLE CJLLLCin'i: START DATE/TIME 03/18/87
•SA'i?L£_j;;LLtCJIi.NJ_JST3^ DJLTJ/JlI!iI_OJ/rLvYC_C_
' C'JLLICrfD JY: E PViUrTTE KECEIVEP F?OMI
'Sft-1'L: ;uC'u: OATEf/TIHE 00/00/00 PEC'D BY:
' ScALej:_
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL MtTHDO:
;,,CASc >n.: 2^6? CRO SAMPLE \3: 0
"» ! Cj.-JTiUCT LS3J^STD-;Y(n^GANIC):
;"CJMr«ACT Lir.:^iT?RY<::iC-'GA11C): CF'JTEC
INCRG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA7Y2
; E M A R K :
- SAMPLE LOG VERIclgO ^Y: UFP
DATA VERIFIED PY; CHH
- R-3UALITYp CC'.'TSOL I NO 1C A Tr S cTH AT DATA ARE UNUSEASLE
' R-KciArl^LiNC. ^MD^"FANltYSl'r'="ri~T5?Crr5T!fY~FljT"VET5TF"lC"S"Tr5Sr
HOLDING Tr-iLS EXCEEOEDC40 CrR 126,OCTOBER 25,1984)
• ••• ',• •£• •• *i" v*.« *.; •.**.* V•>•*,"*i* •'•*"•' -,1 !.!^!-",* -i- W!.! j|**!*•!!-!*:.-;.!»,! •£ f?•fW'fv•,* *'f •,••«• %• *!••.• •»• •I*".1'
TMATTZTO-
j OJ-ESTIHAT;; VALUE >:=N-PRCSUMPTIVE EVIDENCE oc PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
* - *K-ACTUAL VJLUE IS KNOWN TC e£ LESS T"AN VALUE GIVEN
.-. =:= .U^AC.TJLAL VALy; Is KNOWN TO sg GRFATER THAN VALUE GIVEN " - .'. . <
^'J-.^ATERIAL
10UR
10UR
• 10UJ ';:
10UJ .
The EiTIf-'ATEO MINI"Uf.' OUANTIT4TION LIMIT.
RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
.METHYL METHACRYLATE
4-ME T HfU-bp ENT VNQ-SE
PYRIDINE
N-NITROSO-DIMETHYLAMINE
__.. -_M£JHACJHL.ATE
J-HEXANONE
2-PICQLINE
N-NITROSC-METHYLETHYLAMINE
.METHYL..^£THANESULFaNATi
N-NITPOSO-DIETHYLAMIN?
TRANS-1.4-OICHLORO-2-BUTENE
ANILINE
-tENtA.CJHLJJSflflHAHeL
N-NITROSOPY"ROLID]
[TROSOPY"ROLIDINE
M-NITROSOMORPHCLINE
ACETOPHENONE
3-TCLUIOINE
1, 2-OT3ROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
N-NITROSOPIPERIOINE
A.A-DIMETHYLPHENETHYLAMINE
_H ? X A_C H LQROPRQPEN E
SAPRCLE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
ISOSAFROLE
1,4-NAPHTHQQUINONs
~M-dI"NITP03lNZENS
4-MrTHYL-2-NITROANILINE
PENTACHLOROBENZENE
J-NAPHTHYLAMINE
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
2 ,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIOINE
1 ,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
"OIPHENYLAMINE" Cl)
PhENACETIN
A-AMINOSIPHENYL
P^ONAKIDE
"PENTACHLORONITITCrSENZENt
P-DIMFTHYLAMINOAZOBENZENE
4,4'-METHYLENEBISC2-CHLOROANILINE)
~7,12-DIM£TH>LBENHA)ANTHR~ArE~NF~
3-METHYLCHOLANTHRENE
N-MITROSODI-N-BUTYLAMINE
.PI8 = NZO(LftjJ)PJRENf
DIBENZOCA.ETPYRENE
2,6-DICHLOROPHENOL
3,3'-OIMETHYL9ENZIDINE
METHAPYRILENE
~D IB F N Z 0"C A ."Hi PTSTfTE
OI-N-PROPYLNITROSAMINE
SENZVL ALCOHOL
_2-HETHYLPHENOL- • . •. •• •
-------
r .VIP ANALYSIS ^ANAGFMENT SYSTEM
C-Pi-;S5,PEG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
03/05/57
I •
£XTRACTA3LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
OATA RtPJ^TING SHCET
. K S T f *
SIMPLE NO.: "7C14581
SAMPLE TYPE: PUMPBLK
I
I
P R Q J E C_T_iN u. :._£ 7=3-15. P_S3JL£J
, 6 u u -* C c: v.iN£?,L -;' t ° = v E L .
CITr: CONCD^C STAT3: NC
' ST4TI3;i I.D. : ' J'-'3 51
:_P. C R A
'"SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/13/37
i •• s» M P L =_c; L L i C.T ;-;;j :_s T :p .cu f / n M s_
rlECEIVEO FRO*,:
oo/oo/co ^rcf
BY:
- ' CHEMIST:
'A JALTT ICAL
;., Ci5£" NO. : ;
"JSG SAMPLE .'JO:' C INOSG SAMPLE NO.: MD"QA752
>: CE:JTEC
^'ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND NAME
RESULTS IN: UG/L
"5 o u j 8 Eti z 6 ic "A c i d
10UR 4-CHLOROANILINE
10UJ 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
^
50UJ
50U()
10UJ
2 4 5-TRICHLOROPHENOJ.
2-NITRQANILINE "
3-NITPOANILINF
OI3ENZQFURAN
4r NIT.HO AN I LINE
•« | , 3 L M A *.
_E.4.T_A_V£P IFUC_5 YJ__CHiL
i"R-JUiLITY CONTRjL I'!DICAT£S THAT OATA ASE UNUSEASLE
I- K-C'jX? JiJ-,; CAY Jf KAY ''OT "i. P.» = $?NT
. i-RcSA/.PLi:Ju AM'. ? = A'ULYSl! I S" >J S C 5 STR Y "FOR" V F i? 1 FI CTf ro"*}
hJLOIHS TIMES t/Cr^Oi;C40 C = ? l^e.OCTOec1? 26,1384)
yfl-:v^iu: ViLJ- "*«!l-N"3-T ANa'L'YZE'D "«N AI-INTE UFE'R ENC"= S ~
-J-csriM-rLi. VALUE SN-FRESU-'OTIVE EVIDENCF OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
=X-«CT(jAL VlLUE IS KND\N TO ?,E LESS THiN VALUF GIVEN
•j *L--ACTU5L.^ALy^S_AT(5rf^TQ_fiE
vU-.<4T = ::iAL ^AS afJALYZfO FOR B
•> I TH: CSTIMiTHC ''I'JIXIJH Q'J ANTIT
vj _^
BUT NOf D~EfECT'ED. THE NUMBER IS
•1 Q'JANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
A
r
S/T1PLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
• v '
,'08/05/37 PXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER
'; SAMPLE NO.: E7C16582 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
• PROJCCT NO.: ST-J^S "PQGRAM. ELEMENT: RCRA
.. SOU^Ci: MI'jE^L (JC £, OEVcL.
C:T Y : CO'JCT-:c STAT?: NC
'••'sTafTrV. I.-.: V.-LL 1 CCISSOLVEO METAL)
. ST3SCT STATION NO:
" SAMPL; COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/16/87
" S A M P L t COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
'",'COLLECTPC. "Y: D P4QUFTTE RECEIVED FROM:
1 ' SAMPLc SiC'D: CiT = /TIKE 00/05/00 RHC'D BY:
11 - - AL -'} :
' CHEMIST: CHH
•'ANALYTICAL MHTHOD:
I*
„ CAS= N3.: 2i'3 3*G CAMPLE NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA822
CONTRACT LAfa3PATJ?Y(ORG«NIC):
:" CONTRACT LAbQ^iTO^YC IHORCiNIC) : CENTFC
„ REMARK:
.REMARK:
"'SAIPL.E LOG VcRT = lrn °Y? WF«> DATA VSRI^ICD HY: CHH
i.
fl (
"
>WMOMW««rt,MM««0*«««0«*«*«««0««««^^^^
*A-AVCR4G-: VAL'Jc *NA-NOT ANALYZED =SNA I-INTERFERENCES
«J-c3TIMATED VALUE *N-PR = SUMPT I Vi EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
^-ACTUAL VALU-: IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• ^-ACTUAL v'ALLl1 IS KNOWN TC a£ GRCAT5K THAN VALUE GIVEN •
«U-MAT5«IAL .US AN'ALYZiO FOP 6UT NOT DETECTES. THE NUMBER IS
The MNUMU'-: JUANTITMTION LIMIT. -1
V .___ . ,_
\
RESULTS
10IJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
1 JU
10U
20UJ
10U
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
inn
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
sou
sou ,
50U .
sou
**«*<
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
' UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
~\
ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE J
1 i 4-UH-HLUKUB tNitNt >
1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1 BIS( 2-CHLOROISOPROPVL) bIHKR
N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOR09UTADIENE
1 ,2i 4- TR 1C HL 3RD BENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE tHCCPJ
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE i
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
" 'DIMETHYL PHTHALATE '
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2i6-OINITROTOLUENE • ...
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL' ETHER
FLUORENc
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOR03ENZENE CHC8)
4-9RQMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE • - '
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE •
BENZ3(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENt
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIOINE
DT-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZOO AND/OR K )FLUOR ANTHENE
8ENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
TMncMn ri,2,i-cm PYRENE
DIBENZOCA.H) ANTHRACENE
BENZOCGHDPERYLENE .
2-CHLOROPHENOL
^ 2-NITROPHENO.L . • '
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2|4-OICHLOROPHENOL
7,4,^-TRTrHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2,4-OINITROPHENOL
2-HETHYL-4.6-OINITROPHENOL,
PFNTACM" HRHPHFNOL
4-NITROPHENOL
•
J
<">
O
O
^
*\
^
O
^
^
^
^
^
O
-^
^
•^
-------
c AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
' !V
S:I:-.«:::*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
»
l';
i,
»;.
! AThclJS GEORGIA RESULTS
V ' IOUJ
'08/05/37 SXTPACTA5LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WITci)
i
i SA^PL? NO.: H7C16592 SIMPLE TYPE: GRCUNDWA
PROJECT «J3.: 87-126 PROGRAM "LF.MENT: RCRA
]
'STATION i.o.: /r-LL 2 (DISSOLVED METAL)
ST3.? = T STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIMF 03/17/87
SAMPLE COLLLCTICI-j: ST3P OATE/TIM; 00/OC/OO
COLLECTED cr: 'J "i^'JETTE <^CEIVE2 FSC'4:
SAMPLi ?EC*0: DAT;/TI.-IE 00/00/0'J REC'O BY:
SEALED!
CHEMIST: CHH
AN«LfiicAL ".ETHJD:
Cu\'T^4CT L-^Or'iTU^YC INORGANIC) : CiNTEC
=; ;. v. A f K, :
SAMPL;: LOu Vt:(lcI-D 3Y: WFP DATA VERIFIED EY: CHH
'wsSR;!-' ASKSv::!:
Mil HIM" T r !•* • *\ r ^("-"r-riP^fiT TPU i^t nrTnuco ?i IQC^.^
"1 J L U 1 » J i I'l..,} CAlj^uL/.j^*tJ LI^ l^J|,L.IUw^K COlA'tiHy
1
i
i
....,..,..,..,.,,. ,. ., .....-,« •,-.,« -. - • •.• ,- ,••.•-,• .•-,-•,«•,*•.••.••.• .••«•,••."•.-•• -,• ••*">* ^* •.••.-'•••.*••* •.•••••-•'••' '-"i^ *•**"• Vv3? *>*•<••.* 'i* •.*•<••.* •.••."i**.*
=.= A-iV:rAC-; VALUE «MA-NOT ANALYZED 6NAI-INTERFFR ENCE5
! *'J-ESTI.'UT = 0 V«LUE SN-fRtSUKFTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
i *K-»CTIML VALUE IS KNO/HI TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
1 SL-4CTUAL VALJ5 IS KNOWN T1 fit 1P;F,AT = P THAN VALU? GIVEN
1 «U-'1AT:i
-------
SA'IPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESC.RFG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
I ' 03/05/37
/XTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER _____
RESULTS
10U
— 10V
10U
10U
10U
SAMPLF NO.: 57CH583 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOHA
• P R. 0 JEC T_N0. :_.Bl-J*t> ... . PROG^a!', ELEMENT;
..iS'ju-JCc: MIM-^AL ? = t CEVFL.
..•CITY: CONG;-*: STATE: NC
•• STATIC :.:).: w;-u_3_ .cai.$.5.uvjo_jiFiALi__
.. STORcT STATION NO:
10U
10U
10U
~101T
10U
10U
10U
"
• IOU
IOU
IOU
— IOU"
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
ECTED _Y: ? ?i'ju?TT= RECEIVED
Lb R:C';.: DiTr/TT'c 00/00/00
"CHEMIST: c H h
' ANALYTICAL 1:1
., CAS:" 1.3.: 21'.
SAMPLE
CENTEC
. . REMARK:
. H = ••( A x n :
' S Art PL l^LQ G_V£ S I^ltP_SL PYRENE _
" DIBcNZOC A, H 5 ANTHRACENE"
BEMZQCGHIJPERYLENE
2-CHLQRQPHENOL
2-NITRQP_HENQL _ - _ _
PHENOL "
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TB ICriLOROPH = NOL__ _
"4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENtn:
2,4-OINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOlT~~
-------
SAMPLE AfID ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ATHL-NS'GEORGIA
\
RESULTS
rt
I ' 08/05/57
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
KA J EJ? .
SAMPLE N C . : 6701*590
SAMPLE TY»E: G30UNDWA
PJ?OJEC_T_N.a...;_ 37^32.6
, SUU^Ci: •n-JERAL «: I DEVIL.
,CITY: f
P iLOaSLAJLl L EMENT ;_R C 8A_.
STATE: NC
STATIiH I.?.: w;_
STJScT STnTIC'l V3:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
S A M P L£_C C L L S.C.LI ON :_iT J £ Pll£/.T13i_Q.a/J).a/.a.(L
COLLCCTL-O
SAMPLE H:C
Y: : PiJUSTTc •
'C: L'4TS/TI-1F 00/00/0
RCC'D BY:
13UJ
10UJ
10UJ
"10UJ
10UJ
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1 OUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
__ 10UJ
10UJ
10'JJ
10UJ
__10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
UNITS
UG/L
-
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U&/L
UG/L
"UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
_U&/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
i.. C A S L N,1.:
i CONTRACT
: c j :g T R A c T
CHH
»L MiTHOD:
2"j"i3 "~ORl
SAMPLE NO: C
INOR5 SAMPLE NO.: MDQA852
j, R = KA=!H :
!" StMPLE-LDC. V£8IF_L£C_a.Y-i_MFJ
_aA.T A VE R TFI'D BY; THH
V.
10UJ_
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ_
10UJ
10UJ
CFNTEC 13UJ
, 200UJ
10UJ
10UJ
20UJ
1QUJ_
10UJ
10UJ
._ 10UJ _
10UJ
10UJ
10UR
-— 1_ 1 OUR.
10UR
^:::ftftft:::ftftftftftftft:;::::ftft:X::;::::ft:::ftft:;::::j;tftftftftftftftftftftft:;:ftftft::: 1 0 U R
10US
, 10UR_
wA-AViKiL-E VALUE ftNA-NOT ANALYZED *NA"l-INTERFERE"N~CEl 10UR
ftj-cSTIMA7EO VALUE «N-PRESUM?TIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL SOUR
ftK-ACTL'AL VALU; IS KNOUN To 6c LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN SOUR
SL-_ACTJJAI V£LLJf_IS KNn/JN TO gE GRFZTER THAN VALUE GIVEN 50UF_
ftU-MA7t«I4L XA3 ANALYZED FjR SUT NCT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS SOUR
THL M.\UMUri ^'JACTITATION LIMIT.
"'i S ::::••"
TY CONTROL I'i3ICATf$ THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-CUHr'-J'lO .".AY.aS.MAY IJCT _i£..T3£S E NT. ____ ._
'
.... _.. . ____ ._ _ __
-.f'Ll'JG ANO "??A'«ALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
TI,-ifcS EXCEEOEDC40 CFR 136, OCTOBER :S,
'UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_ur,/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JJG/U.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JJG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
.UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JJG/1_
UG/L
RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
1 , 3-DICHLOR08ENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
9ISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROETHANE
~
N-MTROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTAOIENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZEWE
NAPHTHALENE
BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
ISOPHORONE
~H E X A C H L 0 R 0 CTCT 0 PtU
2-CHLOKONAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE _
DIMETHYL PHTH'ALATE
2,4-DINITPQTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
_4-CHLOROPHE_NYL PHENYL ETHER _
FLUORENE " """
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
^HEXACHLOROBENZFNE
-------
OH/05/37
S4.-1PLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E°A-ESD,R^G IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
•:XTPACTSBLE QPGONIC ANALYSIS
: M A. T T-?L .
I
»
SAMPLE NO.: 57C14591
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
STAT?: NC
.'PROJECT NO. :_.17r3Z_6
•»!SOURCk: MINIMAL »2 £ OcV = l.
1 CITY: CONCOXS
" I
," STATI3N I.D.: M£LL_ 4__ U
!•• STQ3ET STATION D3:
:" SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
COLLECTED ?, Y :
'SAMPLE RcC'u:
.SEALED:
,,' CHEMIST: CHH
ANALYTICAL K:
v PiQ'JETTE DECEIVED FROM:
DATE/TIME 00/00/00 R?C'0
BY:
C«SE N.I.:
CONTRACT
363
SAMPLE NO: D
INORG SAMPLE NO.: HOQA8S3
CENTEC
« < c ^ A R K :
I .KEMARK :
" SAMPLL
nATA
HH
.
HJLOIMG Tl^ES cXC£EDEOC40 CFR 136,QCTQ9EB 25,1984)
RESULTS
-J88J-
10UJ
13UJ
_ 10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
tOUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ.
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ,
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ_
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ-
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_- 10UJ.
10UJ
10UJ
20UJ
_10UJ.
10UJ
10UJ
-10UJ-
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_aouj_
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
UNITS
HU
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
^UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
..UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-UG/U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_G/
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
.SA-AVEKAGC VALUE «NA-N3T ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES 10UJ UG/L"
*J-eSTI(-IAT£0 VALUE <--N-P,RESUM?T IVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL 50UJ UG/L
3K-ACTUAL VALUJ IS KNOWN TO 6? LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 50UJ , UG/L
6L= ACTU.il VMilF IS.nnnUH.Tn SP r.pCflTES TXA!\I VALU£ GIVEN JOUJ . '. lir./L
*U-»IATE«:AL WAS ANALYZED ^OR SUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER is souj UG/L"
THE HINUNUM U'JANTI TATION LIHTT.
RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
.lj.3-OICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
8ISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
^
HEXACHLOROETHANE _
is<2-CHLORoisopiro~PYO ETHER -
N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
_HEXACHLOR09UTADIENE _
l,2,4-TRICHLO«08ENZtW? - 1 -
NAPHTHALENE ., '
BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE : •'•'
^ISOPHORDNE _____ ______ _ __
HEXACHLOROCYCTBFeUTAOICNE (HCCH -
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE _ ___ __
DIMETHYL PHTHALTTI "
2,4-OINITROTQLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
_*-.CHLORQJ?HEllYL PHENYL ETHER _
FLUORENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODI PHENYL AMINE/OIPHENYLAMINE
aiEXACHL020BENZENE._CHCB.) __
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHEMANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
3I-N-BUTYLPHTHALflTg _ 1] _
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
ISC2rI_THYLHEXYL)_PJl.tHAtMI _ _
SENZOCAJANTHRACEVE
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDIN6
BENZOCB AND/OR K3FLUORANTHENE
BENZOCB AND/OR IOFLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
-INDENO _Cl,2,3-CJ3J_PrJ?EilE
DIBENZOCA,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZOCGHDPERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
_2=.NITRO£HE-NQl :
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,^-OICHLOROPHENOL
_2iA,6-TRICHLQROPHENOL_
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOC
2t4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4t6-OINITROPHENOt
.PENJACHLOROPHENQL
4-NITROPHENOL
-------
9
»
•» i
54'IPLE iNC ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E°A- = SD,REC- IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
: ' 03/05/37
SXTSACTASLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER
E MO.: B7Cls;85
SIMPLE TYPE: G30UNDWA
iPkOJEC.T_NO..L>8_7^3?
^;CITY"CJNCCK?
•'STATION i.c
, SIOR5T STATION
P5_OGJLA.M_iL 5«lNj_L_RC RJ__
STATE: NC
s c L L_i__cr.I.s_LOL.v ? n..H f IA LJ
I
SAMPLE CCLLcCTION: START DATE/TIM? 03/17/67
S AtlP L E _C 5LL t C T I JN :._S_T 5 P &A II/J.I^-LJLI/O 3/OJ_
'cQLLiCT£0 1 f : r r:
SAMPLE '•«• = C * L : C i T =
SEALiia:.. _
TT-: -'lECEIVEC ?»?•<:
".t: 00/00/00 KEC'D BY:
- ! CHEMIST: Cnn
CAS = _N>J.: 2353" JRG SAMPLE NO: L INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOOA927"
CmTRACT LAoJ'sATDRYCIN'RGA'JIO: CENTEC
RE1A8K: ~ ~~
5 c 1A R K :
aP.L £ .-LC G_V.£JU£1=.D_3U_JUIP_
'^-•JUALITY COHTS3L INTICATCT, THAT DATA «UE UNUSEABLE
• ,R-CU.V.?2J\'D J-iA.Y_.Qi_i''_AY- ni.T-.3E F'£S£1JT
. -R-RESA 1PL1N(, A/^U '^EA^,iLYS:S IS rj?CfSr=A'-'Y FOS VERIFICATION
MCLOI.Nu TIMcS EXC£^D£D(40 CFR 1 3-. , HCTC <• E R 26,1964)
ESULTS
10UJ
—
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1QUJ
10UJ
10'JJ
IQiJJ
10UJ
lOUJ
10UJ
10UJ •
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ
10UJ"
10UJ
10UJ
-10UJ.
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
20UJ
_10'JJ_
10UJ
10UJ
_13UJ_
1'JUJ
10UJ
10UR
_10Ufi
10UR
10UR
;;:A-4VtKAif VALUE wNA-NDT ANOLYZEO «N A I-INf ERF E REHC"~SS
*J-ESTIl'A rej VALUE rtfj-P
-------
E AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESOiREG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
XTPACTA9LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
iij5 S
SAMPLE NO.: 67C16534
SAMPLE TYPE: GROU'IDWA
PROJECT_Na.JL_31=i26
. SJU^Ci: CINERAL i~. (.
CITT: CONCORD
PaOGRAM ELEMENT; RC3A
DEV5L.
STAT?: NC
STATION
..WEt.L..4...iALYSiS"iS"N = CE'sSl"RY"FOR VER I F'l'CfffQfT
i.l if if if if if.;: if if if if if if if if if:'; 'f if if if if if if if if if if if if tf if if if if if if if if -f if if if if if if ififififtfifitifif it if if if if if if ff if
*"N'A ^N 0 T~~A N A LTZ'ED
10U
10UJ.
10U
10U
10UR
10UR_
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR
10UR"
'-'FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERA&£ VALUE -- .- - - - . ._. ,
»J-cSTIMATED VALUE SN-PReSUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL SOUR
•i >>K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 6F LESS THAN VALUE GIV!N SOUR
"r*CTuAL,.yALUS_l}L.!5NBWH-ILBt^RgVEB,^THMJ V.ALU.5.GIVEN __, SOUR.
.
SOUR
*U-HAlE3r«L WAS AflTLYZtO-^OTS- CUT"Ho^frfftcitQ. TMC"NliSB>ni
THE MINUMUM QiJAflTITATIO'J LIMIT.
UNITS
UG/L
JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/
-
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
~UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/U_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L"
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
lj3-OICHLOR03ENZENE
~I, 4=TJ ICHCTJ^CBTNT EHE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROETHANE
"BISC2-CHLOR01SOPffOPYLJ ETHER
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HE XACHLOROBUTADIENE
'1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZETTE
NAPHTHALENE
BISC2-CMLOROETHOXY) METHANE
_ISOPHORONE _'•
HEXACHLOROCTCTOPEHTADIENE CHCCPJ
UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
~UG/L DIMETHYL" PHTHATTSTE
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L 2i6-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
"UG/LFLUORcNE
UG/L PIETHYL PHTHALATE
UG/L N-NITROSOD IPHENYLAM INE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HC3)
~UG/L 4-?KOMOPHENYL" PHENYL~ETHTR
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
JG/I, DI-N-SUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENg
UG/L PYREfJE
UG/L BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
UG/L BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
"UG/L BENZO(A)ANTH
-------
E AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
F?A-£SD,REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
!^XT
-------
S AND ANALYSIS M4NSGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-£SO,R£G IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
08/05/37
tXTPACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER
I • i
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16586
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
?3{UE£.T_N.OL, :_JlrJi6 PPOGPAM ELEMENT; RCRA_
,;SJU3C£: liIHtRAL 3£ t DeVTC.
.CITY: CONCORD STATH: NC
•'STATION i.o.: U;LL 7 COISSOLVED PETAL)
. STORET "STATION NC:"
• SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
COLLECTED t-r: C PA-..U3TT: RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE RcC'D: DAT3/TInE OC/00/00 RFC'D SY:
S S » L i j : . ____________ _ ____
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL r'c TH3D :
CASE NO.: 22
CJNTSUCT LAb
CUNTRACT LA3
. R<
.REMARK:
• SAMPI-P_j pr, VFRTFTFO PY; WFP DATA VERIFIED BY; CHH
''«**REMARKS**«
TI",cS EXCEEDEDC40 CF3 13*,OCTOBER 26,1984)
RESULTS
10UJ
~
*A-aVER4&E "VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED*NAI-INTERFERENCES
*%J-£STIHATEO VALUE *N-P"JESUKPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
:;:K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
__*L-A::TUAL VALUE is KNOWN TO eE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEJLJ ., .
vU-'^ATERIAL HAS ANALYZED FOR 3UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
Trlt MNUHU" iUANTITATION LIMIT. ,
10UJ
10IJJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
SAKOL6.NO: D INORG SAMPLE NC.: MDQA846
): CEMTEC
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
~10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
20UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ_
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ »,
_10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
.10UJ
10UJ
50UJ
SOUJ
L50UJ
SOUJ
*«««»ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS
UG/L
UG/IT~
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JG/C —
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L~
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L~
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
—
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U3/L
UG/L
-UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
.UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
G/L
JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
-1,%-DicHLTjiraBETjrm
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BISCZ-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOSOETHANc
~8ISC2-CHLOROISOPROinrL) ETHER
N-NITROSQDI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOR09UTAOIENE
"1,2',4-TRICHLOROBENZETre
NAPHTHALENE
BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
ISOPHORONE
"HEXACHLOROCYCtaPTNTAUlbNfc (HCLPJ
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
'DIMETHYL' THTHJITBTE
2,4-OINITROTOLUENE
2,6-OINITROTOLUENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
-~"
DIFTHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAM.INE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOR08ENZENE CHCB)
•~~
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI-N- BUTYL PHTHALATE
~FLUORANTHEI7E"
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3ISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
"ENZOTO ANTHRACENE ""
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
"BENZOCB" AND/OR lOFLTTORflNTHENE
SENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUOR ANTHENE
9ENZO-A-PYRENE
_INOENO <1,2.3-COJ PYR_E_NJ
DIBENZOCA,H)ANrHRTCTNE^
BENZOCGHDPERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
"
__
UG/L
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2|4j6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYL"PHEtfDI
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
PENT4CHLOROPHE NQL
4-NITROPHENOL
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
' JPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
'-' !
' 03/05/37 g'xTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NO.: 27C16587 S AMPLE TrPE: GRQUNDWA
i PROJECT P,OCR.« !LEM5NT, ,«, \
,.'CITY: CONCOR3 STATE: NC
•STATION :.:.: T^IP °L£\K coisscLv^n METAL)
.. STORET STATION >JO:
"SAMPLE COLLECTION: START CATS/TIME 03/11/37
••SAMPLE C:LL;.::TIJN: s T n » CATE/TIMF. 00/TO/OO
'"'COLLECT;! 'Y: C PiCl|CTTE PrC^IVEO FR9X:
'"'SiMPL: KEC'C: D A T5 / T 1 '•' ~ OC/OV03 R^C'O BY:
'• S c A L ; 0 :
' CHEMIST: CHH
11 ANALY TICAL Mr THOO:
!•
..CASE N1.: 2363 0*5 SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: M03A847
"CONTRACT Lli'J^ATO^YC INCRGANIC) : CcNTEC
M
-'SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP DATA VERIFIED SY: CHH
'*«*RcMJKK Sft**
* HCLDI'JG TIMtS EXCEEDEOC40 C<=R 136, OCTOBER 24,1984)
" '',-*>'''
' ' ' 1*
"'...• !.•• ^ .
•»
,,i 34-SV = *i.G7 VALUE ftNA-NOT ANALYZED *N A I-INTERFERENCES
*J-=STIHAT:0 VALUE *H-F Z = SUMP TI VE cVIOENCr OF PRESENCE OF- MATERIAL
,• :;:K-4CTUiL VALUE IS KNO>«N TQ &E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
. ' ftl -ar.TU&L. viL'JE . IS KNHWN TD 3? GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN '-.--
::'U-HATtfi:IAL WAS ANALYZED FOR 2UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER. IS
THE MI.MuKJM 3U4MTITATIOH LIMIT. ,
V- ! •
RESULTS
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10'JJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
13UJ
10UJ
10UJ '
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1QUJ
20UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ -,
5J
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
50UJ
50UJ ;
' 50UJ "
TS*=>*.-;!ANALYrrCAL RESULTS*****
UNITS COMPOUND
UG/L 1,3-OICHLOROBENZENE J
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
— UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L '
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"• UG/L
.. UG/L
UG/L
UGVL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
..- UG/L
-..', UG/L
UG/L
1,4-UICHLUKUHtNitNt \
t ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
SISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLCROETHANE
BISC2-CHLU«UISUPKUHYL) ETNEK
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROSUTAOIENE
1,Z,4-TRICHLOR08ENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
SISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANf
ISOPHORONE
' HEXiCHLOROCYCLDPFMrflDIENE CHCCP)
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
OIMHTHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-OINITROTOLUENE v •'
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE ' '• ' " '',-', . .
' 4-CHLORQPHENYL PHENYL ' ETHfR1 ' • ' - •''
1 FLUJRENE "'
OIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMIME
HEXACHLORC5ENZENE CHCB)
' 4-3ROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENANTHRENE • -. ,
ANTHRACENE ' ;,
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE ' '
PYRcNE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATB
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE ' '
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROEENZIDINE
OI-N-OCTYLPHTH4LATE
?ENZO(B AND/OR K JFLUORANTHENE
BENZOC3 AND/OR K 5FLUQRANTHENE
BSNZO-A-PYRENE
INOFNO C1.2.3-CO) PYRFNE
DIBENZOC A, H) ANTHRACENE
BENZOCGHDPERYLENE
Z-CHLOROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-OICHLOROPHENOL
2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHEMOL
2,4-OINITROPHENOL
2-M5THYL-4.6-D IN ITRO PHENOL
' PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NlTROPHENOL
•
••
••
m
}l
n
it
Tt
"
M
*
.
"
•*
M
M
"J
<~\
~\
^
s*\
^
n
n
-------
i ' '08/05/37
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E«>A- = SD,R-& IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
EXTRACTABLE CRGANIC ANALYSIS
WAJIg
SAMPLE NO.: 37CU5B3
SAMPLE TYPE: 6LKWA
MI'J^RAL 3i
iCitYC CONCORD
E, DEVEL.
STiTf: NC
STATION I.C.: 6aiL£K_MA?LK_.CaiSSOl.Via_ii;IAU
STATION NO:
r
i
i
r
r
i
r •
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START CATE/TIXE 03/17/57
• SAL1PLc_COLL£CT:0:Nl_iTj:_£ _ ill.E/JIilLJJ.a/.QQy 0 0 _
COLLECTS ?Y: r- PViUETTE • RECEIVED FROM:
'SAMPLE SfC'U: DATf/TI'-lE OC/00/00 REC'D 8Y:
CHEMIST: CHH
ANALYTICAL ME
.CASE N:.: 2i-:3 OR3 S«"?LE NO: o
~ ~~ LA'-^ATCNYCOiK-aMC) :
LAsJ:iTO^Y(I%0»3i'!IC): CENTEC
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA850
1 c.« A R K
SAMPLE LOG-
^ ?I?IC3 -3Y :
huLOlN3 TIM;S ExCEcOFEC-VO
1 I
__ OJHA_ViRUilEJ3_B.Y_;_j:Hlt_
136.0CTOEER 24,1984)
RESULTS
1CUJ
lOUv"
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1JUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1DUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
_10UJ_
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
JOUJ.
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ_
10UJ
10UJ
1JIJJ
__30UJ_
10UJ
10UJ
20UJ
10UJ..
10UJ
10UJ
r
r
sS if if if if if :': -.;: :> :|: :): # if if •'.: if '.: :|: if if if if if if if if ft :> ft if if ~-f ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ** ft * * ft ft ft ft ft * ft * ft ft ft
ftN Al^T N TTR Fl "RENCTS
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10U.
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ.
10UJ
!': £ A - 1 V E R A & £ "' V A L II E ft NA^j 0~T~AN A CTzTO ----
*J-dSTIMAfEO VALUE ftN-P^tSUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL 50UJ
--^-ACTUAL VALO: IS KNOWN TO a£ LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 50UJ
J^N TQ ag GRE
/;Ǥ ANALYZED FOR bUT N2T DETECTED. THf NUMBER IS
THE MINUiTJM QJANT1TATION LIMIT.
50UJ
ftftftftftANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS
UG/L
~JGVU~
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-UG/L—
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"UG'/L
UG/L
UG/L
JJG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_U5/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
U'o/L
_UG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_JG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JJG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_JG/.t_
UG/L
COMPOUND
1. 3-DICHLORQ8ENZEME
•"~
1, 2-DICHLC703ENZENE
BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROrTHANE _
~9ISC2-CHLOROISQPPWYL) ETHER
N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENIEMc
HEXACHLOROSUTADIENE _
"1,2,4-TRICHLOR03ENZEKI£
NAPHTHALENE
8ISC2-CHLOROETH3XY) METHANE
ISOPHORONF
(HCCP)
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE _
"DIMETHYL PHTHfflTATE ~~
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER _ _
CIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
_HEXACHLOROBENZ_F.NF CHCS^
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
_DlTN-SUTYLPJiTJiALAU: _
FLUORANTHEME
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3IS(2-ET.HYLH£XYL >..P H.1MA.L AXE _
BENZO(A) ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3,3'-OICHLOROBENZIDINE
_PI-N-QCTYLPHTHALATE_
"9ENZOCB AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
SENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYREME
.INDENO. C1,2,3-CD1_J>YREHI
OIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
BENZOCGHDPERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
_2-NITR.QPH£jNQI
PHENOL
2,4-OIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
-2,4,S-T?ICHLORQPHENOl
4-CHLOPO-3-METHYLPHENfft
2,4-OINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENJ1I.
4-NITROPHENOL
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV
***-J*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
*• V
r f
, ' 08/05/97
1 • .
• 1
! i
• PROJECT NO.:
,- sou-; c £ : Vii; L
CITY : CONC^
i STATION: :.-.
" SAMPLE COLLE
• SfcrtPL t _COLL£
SA.IPLL ^ • c • £
' CHEMIST: CHH
" ANALYTICAL M
J-
„ C A S c MO.: 23
, CJUTRiCT LA0
."CONTRACT L A t
M 1
* 'HCLDIiiG^Tirii
:!
)
.'o** = D3rN3TE^
ATHENS GEORGIA
EXTRACTA3LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: S7C16589 SAMPLE TYPE: 3LK.WA
97-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
*<" M L •? E L C £ V 1 L •
j STATE: NC
: c!fLC SLAMK CDISS':-LVt:3 METAL)
CTION: START OATE/TIMP 03/17/67
CTION: STDP UATF/TI»IE oo/oo/oo
: ^ P4.:iJETTE DECEIVED FROM:
: DATr/TI'-IT 0&/00/00 REC'D BY:
£T"00:
63 :3RG SAMPLE \3: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOli'ASSi
J:UflfD A1'_HFJ» QAJ !L_VJ- •? If I = D BY-
S SXCEcDED(40 CFP 136, OCTOBER 26,1984)
' • ' •
V V ':•
pft-AVl-SAbt VALUE ::FLUORAN"THENE
BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO- A- PYRENE
INOENO C1.2.3-CO) PYRENE
DIBENZOCA,H)ANTHRACENE . . ...
BENZOCGHDPERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHF.NOL • . . ; '.
2-NITROPMENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-OICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL'
2,4-OINITROPHENCL
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
- — - — t J
~N
"
« !
M
M
-------
SA.1PLH AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E°A-=SO,R=G IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
*fc***ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NC.: *7C165ijl
SAM°LE TYPE:
•PROJECT NO.: £7-325 PROGRA" rLEMENT; RCRA
i,. sou*cI: -;>.\usT;L"T-~c Dcvnr. ~~
• ,CITY: conco-T STATE: NC
i" I
,-'STATION I,D.: ='J.'.3 = LAt!X_CDISSnLV50J
-------
^
**
*N
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESC.REG IV
i ATHENS GEORGIA
rf j •-..-.
'08/05/87 PESTICIDES/fPCB'S AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
•j • MATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C165B2 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
' !
• P_R3JECT__NO. : 87-326 PROG? AM. ELEMENT : RC3A
..SOUkCc: Mi;JL«AL R: C CeVJL.
t,CITY: C3NC2RC STATE: NC
'•STATIQ-I I.O.: .JiLL 1 ( r I SSOLVF1 M?TAL)
., STJRcT STATUS NJ:
"SAMPLE COLLECTION: START CAr = /Ti«E 03/16/87 ..
••SAMeLt_.C3LL = Cri3H: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
"COLL£CT£D iY: D FATJETTc RECEIVED FP3M:
" SA.IPLf _* = C 'L-: :• 4 T :: / TI '« = 00/00/00 R=C'D 3Y:
"CHEMIST: CHH • •
ANALYTICAL McTHJO: . . • • •
..CASi^m.: 23^3 3?G SJMPLi NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA822
"CJUT^iCT L-s5k 1T33 r C I'JGRGANIC ) : CtNTEC
M
» R£MAHH ''
71 1
an
ftftftftftANALYTICAL RESULTS*«ftft» . '•'' ]
RESULTS- UNITS COMPOUND * .'
0.05U UG/L ALDRIN J
0.05U UG/L
0.05U . UG/L
0.05U UG/L
0.05U UG/L
0.0 5U
0.05U
0.05U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0. SOU
0.50U
l.OU
0.50U
0.50U
0 . 5 0 U ,
l.OU
0.50U
l.OU
—
--
0. SOU
0.10U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
^_UG_/!I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
UG/L
UG/L
, UG/L
: US/IL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
• UG/L
nr,/i
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
HEPTACHLQR S
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE . . - • '/•; • -..,
ALPHA-BhC -.- • ',' •'«'• ,-Y "«",'.'.>.'
3ETA-BHC - ' ' ••'. s •
GAMMA-BHC (LINOANE)
CFLTA-BHC
ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELORIN
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
4,4'-DOE (P,P'-DDE)
4.4--DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDRIN
ENOOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENOOSULFAN SULFATE
ChLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
PCfi-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248}
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PC3-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2 •
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2.'-' :' '.:,-
GAMMA-CHLOROANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLOROANE /2
METHOXYCHLHR , ,
SNDRIN KETONE • '. , i » , ,. '}, • ,
• » v ''''-•','' " i '-' "'('•61'' • ^J&.*-j'" '"* ' ' ''' s* ') i ' { '" -1 •- ' ' , s 1 ''-1' - -' • ,(f *( ' yt£'. \: " . ^ » ' ' '' ' ''•*•"* ,"* ',, T •< • ' ' ' ••• • '
.
^ ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft 0 :.:=:; ft :.: ft :.;•.: ft:.: ft :•• ft =.: ft W ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft $ ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft
ftA-AVc?«Oc VALU: ftNA-NOT ANALYZED ftNAI-INTERFERENCES
ftJ-ESTIKATED VAUJc ftN-PR;SUMPT I VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE TF MATERIAL
ftK-ACTUAL ViLUE IS KNO'//M T3 3E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
' • jSU-MATcBI AL UA5 ALIALYIFD FOR dUT NOT acTECTED '.THr NUIBFR T_S ' •
THE HI.MM'JM .'UANTITATiaN LI^IT.
i. WHEN .jo »ALU; is =>tPan?o, SEF CHLOROANE CONSTITUENTS., ,
2. CONSTITUENTS OR .'-^TAeOLITE S Oc TECHNICAL CHLQRDANE.
V
•;' ;;;;:. • . ', .„ '-.. ;- . ',,
"X
r
-------
" f
SIMPLE AND ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,
•sv E°A-ESD,REG IV
J ATHENS 3EORGIA
k? I •
~ i ' (ie/05/3/ PESTICIO=S/PCS'S ANO OTHSR CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
i • WATFR
.1 ,
9[" SAVPLE NO.: 87016592 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
» i '
. oon IPTT Nfi • : L .
,» ;it CITY: COM COR: STAT?: NC
, ST3i<:T STATION in:
"i^^lss^isiisaLlisrjsiWfci w,w,n •• <-
^ •• sa\i;L£1liC'L: D'ATE/TIMF oo/oo/oo" " *FC;D CY:
r- 'CHEMIST: CHH
' "ANALYTICAL MFTH3D:
CASE" .laV:'"2363 JS^ SAMPLE MO: o INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA854
/^ "CONTRACT LAhasArjRYORGANio:
"CONTRACT LASCRATOR Y( IHGRGANIC): CENTEC
1, RtMA-JK ,:
(^ __ REMARK:
.. r , ., -, i - inc i/roTcTcn By- UBD n»T» VPRTFTFn R V S ' C H H
1
i* . , > ' i .
_ " tjifffififS :;: ft ft ftftftft ft ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ************:::******«***********
. "'*A-A^ERAGE"'v"tLUc" *HA-MOT ANALYZES *NU-INTE9FERENCES
t- 5'J-ESTIMAT^O VALUE *N-P»ESU«PTI VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
' •'. «H-ACTUAL VALUS IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN - . . ,
. The MINIMU'1 QiJiflTITATIOfl LIKIT. <• , •
r> 1. HH£N NO VALU: IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS... :,,;*.,.•,
^ " Z. CONSTITUtNTS OR META30LITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE. ,-'••,'••>.
ftft*** ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS UNITS COMPOUND
0.05U UG/L .fikSSI^uinn <•>,
'O.dSU OC/L HEPTACHLOR > ^N
0.05U • UG/L HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE . - .
0.05U • UG/L ALPHA-BHC
0,.05U M/L 3EJ.j>T^HC., -.^.^ i '
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0. 10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0 , 1 0.U
0.10U
0.10U
0. SOU
0.50U
l.OU
o.sou
o.sou
0.50U_
l.OU
o.sou
l.OU
—
--
O.STJU
0.10U
'; 4'
-^••-
UG/L bAnMA-BUV. ILlNUaNE J •
UG/L DELTA-BHC
UG/L ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
UG/L O.IELORIN
"UG/L • 4,4"-ODT (P,P -DDT) . •
s • UG/L 4,4"-DDE ( P , P '-DDE) '. -.- • • .•;•
UG/L 4,4'-DOO (P»P*-DDD) '.> ' "', '?-;' ,»'. ' •* .' "
UG/L ENORIN .- •' ' '"- '--'•• ••
'JG/L ENDOSULFAN II (SETA) "
UG/L EMDOSULFAN SULrATE ,
UG/L CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I ' .
Ijr./l ?CR-1?42 (ARTCLOR 1242)
~"UG/L'' PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
UG/L PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) -•-'..
UG/L PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) ,'. .'
UG/L PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
UU/L PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) »
UG/L PCS-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
UG/L TOXAPHENE
UG/L. ?Hk2?D^rAHi - ' . '•! '' '. '. • : <• 1 . :';'. , • " • "
-------
ifcrrcc-ccccccf r__c c_
•r
»!;::j:t;t:j;53J*
>
i
y
3Z
/
-;
-
UJ
0
»»-« "
a
a.
"J
xoc
DC3l_>
^
z 'i
.
I-UIO
oaa
V
• Ul
•'
O rj •** wt CM tji o «O
I-UIE: 1
M-'»- o-ttororor'oca
•X -*J -OO O -fcO ^ »OOOOOOO
-,^W
L
2 ^ ^f» » 1 _joooooo» %r«-iu-u>oi uoo^ tj^>-
LJU 1 ffv | 1 r?orOOOZr>rDa^VMf jrjfNJtMOHO 1 O 1 cv' 1 1 1 O>CZ
OLor»-t-3:«Et-o_)» • • or'ooo ill i i i ji i « ob: <« zr v-
..
<
SZX 1 XC£
E«t Q-t^l— O
*-tX*XXXXX.XXX'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
[00
lAT-l
OC^OC3OOOOO»-t»Ht-««-t«-H»-<«-»U^tAOUKtr>ir\Oir>O I
*st *.*..)') I I I It I !••
U-.OOOC>OOOOC»OOOOOOOO»HOOC3t-HO^» I I I I I I I I I OO
-------
SA'-1°LE fcND ANALYSIS MAN45EMEUT SYSTEM
IV
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
ATHENS GEORGIA
• V. ' .. _ .
rf~
.'Od/05/67 PiSTICIC'JS/PCB'S AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
j • • W A T ? R
* '1 S4MPLE NO.: 37C16590 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
t ,
i ' :
.•PRT.I = CT NO.: P7-'24 PROG^A." FLEMFNT2 RCSA
'..t3U?Ci: MI*:XhL ? = t OEViL.
•» ,CITY: coucosc STAT*;: NC
1- STATION I.:.: ycLL * CDISSOLVEP METAL)
, , STJrf: f STATION NO:
"'"SAMPLE COLLECTION: STAPT DATE/TIME 03/17/8?
-SAMPLE COLLECTION: STJP DATE/TI^IE oo/oo/oo
-v ("COLLECTED BY: o PIOUETTH < = CEIVED FROM:
'"iA'-IPLfc ^£C'L: ?-;T;/TIXr OC/00/00 KEC'D BY:
- ) t. A L L 3 :
- "Cric"IST: CHN
'ANALYTICAL IIGTHOO: CHri
|.,CASE NO.: 2363 URG S»MPLF NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA352
"CJNTSACT LibCRJTO";Y(INOn&«"JIO: CENTFC
„ « i "•! A -' K :
•N __ K £ M A S K :
. si-ipi r- " •TI"- v-yTFirD BY: UFP DATA VERIFIED BY: CHH
9 ' '' '"' * >-••••••••••
ti
» • • _. .v...Vr . •-
M 1
^- :|: :;; -:ji :|: :;: ^: :': £ ^: :;: :|: :;: •;: :;: :|: :;: £ :': :|: :^ :|: % f.: £ * :|: * * # :;: :!: :'.: * :!: * * # :;t ^: :|: :;: $ :;: :|j ^: ^: ********** * * * * * * * *
*A-aV£^AGi VAL'J: *!M-NCT ANALYZED *,NA I-INTERFERENCFS
—
HEPTACHLO* EPOXIOE
ALPHA-BHC '•' -
9ETA-3HC
GAMMA-PHC (LINDANE)
OELTA-BHC
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
4,4'-DOT (P,P'-OOT)
4,4'-DOE (P,P'-DOE) . ,
4i4'-DOO (PtP'-DOD) v ",•',.
ENDRIN :- ' ' ' :•
6NDOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENOOSULFAN SULFATE ,
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
PC?-1242 (ARDCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PC3-1232 (AROCLQR 1232) ' ;:
PCB-1248 (AROCLQR 1248) . . ' •
PC9-1260 (1ROCLOR 1260)
PCP-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
BETA CHLOROENE /2
GAMMA-CHLOROENE /2
1-HYDRQXYCHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLOROANE /2
CIS-NONACHLO"? /2
METHOXYCHLOR
ENORIN KETONE
•
' T '' • - ,' < '•'
1 !
,
•\
-------
* - * * V ,,~. „
t
- \
f. f
•S
, ' 08/05/J7 Pc i
i
, i
i '
• PROJECT !IO.:
. S u u K c i : .v i '; ;
•% ..CITY: CONGOU
!"STJTia'-i I.?.
" SAMPLE CCLL?
- iAMPLc.COLLL
— "ciLLiCfcD i! Y
" j K f-v i> L E -v L- C ' u
CHEKIS : CHH
. " A NA L 1 T C A L 1
"CONTRA T Lii
1 >•
3-.'1PLE tND ANALYSIS '•' ft N 4 G F M E M T SYSTEM
r3A-ESC',SE& TV
AThFNS GEORGIA
/
i
TICIO-S/?C^*S AND OTH^R CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
... _iAIE2_
SA"I°L" NC.: £7C16";91 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
,7-32, P.O...H .L^r: *r9i
?~L ^- I DFV.-L.
r STATF: NC
: ir'iLL ^.C211S_QLV50 M=TAL)_ ...
CTl:j\: STAfT DATE/TIME 03/17/87
CLI3N;. ST^^ DtTP/TIlt 00/00/00
: : f'i'.UiTTE RECEIVED PROM:
: P^Tl/TI!"- 00/00/00 i^C'D BY:
E T ri J D :
CSA7J-1 Y( INGrfC-t'lIC) : C5-MTEC
., RtMAkN
- SAMPL^ __LJu . VcRIFr--D ?Y: WFP HttTi vfRTFTF-D BY: CHH
\
RESULTS
C.OFU
0.05IJ ~
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0 . 0 5 'J
0.05U
_ 0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0 . 1 0 U
0. 10U
0 . 1 0 U
0. 10U
0. SOU
c.?ou
l.OU
0. SOU
0.50U
_ 0.5QU
i .au
0.50U
1. DU
—
--
0.50U
0.10U
SSSSfrA
UNITS
_UG/J
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JG/L
'JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC-/L
UG/L
U3/L
NALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
ALDRIN y
HEPTACHLOR \
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
GAMMA-?HC CLINDANE)
DELTA-BMC
ENOOSULF4N I (ALPHA)
OIELPRIM
4,4'-OOT CP,P'-OOT)
4,4'-DDE CP.P'-ODE)
4,4'-DOD CP.P'-ODD)
ENDRIN
ENOOSULFAN II (9ETA)
ENDOSULFON SULFATE ,
CHLOROANE CTSCH. MIXTURE) /I
PC=-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 C4ROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 CAROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1248 (AROCLQR 1248)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCE-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
ALPHO-ChLORDENE /I
BETA CHLOKDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
1-HYDROXYCHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-M3NACHLCR /2
ALPH4-CHLORDANE /2
METHOXYCHLCR
ENORIN KETONE
H .
•i!
~ " '. -ij-c" 37Ii"AT
•j VK-ftCTUAL
• — SU.-aAUil4
VALUi- *N4-NOT AIJ4LYZED *NA I- INT ERFE R ENC ES
:D VALUE *N-PRE SUMPT J VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
VALUE IS *»:3UN TO P. ; L E S S THAN VALUE GIVEN
L_:VA^_AjL4LlZ£n £DH iUT NOT DFTFf.TFn. THB NUMRFR T
-------
SIMPLE AND ANALYSIS KANAGF.KFNT SYSTEM
ATHENS olORGIA
ft * 1
1 Oi/05/37 P:STICIO=S/PC?'S AND OTHIR CHLOPINATED COMPOUNDS
HATER
. i
3AI1PLF \'C.: .;7C16585 SAMPLE TYPE: GRQUNOWA
• PR3.1fCT «jn.: ,>7_i?<, PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
r | . i i , " • • M T .1 - D i 1 L' C i1 Pi C \i £ 1
•ciJiJJ'XUt" i. -\ _ f\ M L *\ i_ C» L C * — L •
,,C;TY: cj'<2 STATE: NC
• r.TuTi,-M T.:.: J--LL 5 fd?saLv:-o -IFTAL).
. STJRcT STATION H3:
"SAMPLE: COLLECTION: STA'T CATC/TIME 03/17/3?
•• 5 A '•! P 1 c C u I L r C T I R V 5 T n P D A T - / T I M F 0 0 / 0 C / 0 0
"i«.-1r'Li Rc'c'L: £«Tf/TI».E"00/03/Oj" " ' R=c''D BY:
'CHEMIST: CHH
"ANALYTICAL II^THJO:
..CASH NJ.: 23£2 :^G Sl'-'PLE U3: C INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA827
C'j'i T * i : r L i c ; -^ j T 3-' Y c o R GA'J re ) :
" C J ••! T <• • A C T L « 3 3 s' '. T J ? Y Cl \ C '< 3 A \ : C ) : C ? H T E C
'•j/HFLii LOj vf,?T'-r-T BY: u = «> r.iTi VFSTFTCT BY: r.HM
•i
RESULTS
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.1 OU
0. 10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.1CU
0.10U
0. 10J
0. SOU
0. SOU
l.OU
0. SOU
0. 30U
0.50U
l.OU
C.50U
l.OU
—
—
0.50U
0. 10U
*«***flNALYTICAL RESULTS*****
UNITS COMPOUND
UG/L ALORIN J
UG/L
UG/L
-JJG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/_L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
. UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
'IG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
nr,/i
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
HEPTACHLOR >
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC
9ETA-HHC
GAMMA-BHC CLINDANE)
OELTA-BHC
ENDOSULFAN I CALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-ODT)
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
4,4'-DDD CP.P'-DDD)
?NDRIN
EMDOSULPAN II (BETA)
rNOOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDAHE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
PC9-1242 CARQCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 CAR3CLOR 125*)
PCE-1221 CAROCLOR 1221)
PCP-1232 CAROCLOR 1232)
PCR-124H fAROCLOR 12431
PCB-1260 CARHCLOR 1260)
PCP-1016 CAROCLOR 1016)
TCXAPHENE
ALPHA-CHLORDFNE /2
BETA CHLOROENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 '
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRAMS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
METHOXYCHLOR
FNDRIN KETONE
M - ' " *' ' ' : " , '
,: SA-A^ftSt. vatU1: ^N^'-NOT AMLYZED =:=NA I-INTFRFER ENCFS
! *J-t jTI/.ATf C VaLUt SN-PPESUMPTIVE EVIOENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• 'Six-ACTUAL VAL'JE IS KI.OJN TO i; L?SS T1AN VALUE GIVEN
vU-MAJL'J «L yaS ANALYZED FOS SIJT MOT DETECTED. THP NUMBER is
1. WHEN NC VnLU£ 1 * * ' t DC R T F.D , SEE CHLOCDANF CONSTITUENTS. ,
' 2. C3JiTITU:NTS O? ^?T4 30L I Tr S UF TECHNICAL CHLOROANE.
1 —
11
if
if
M
B
H
N
M
M
M
M
*
^
M
V
-------
\ "^
SMPLi: AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTFM
EPA-ESD( ff:G IV
*>.1***ANALYT1CAL RESULTS*****
> AThEUS GEORGIA
e V '
]
! Od/05/d7 SL STICiniS/PC1! 'S RNO OTHE" CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
. ' . • W 4 T E P
j'l SAMPLE NO.: 37CliS34 SAWL? TY'E: GRtJUMDWA
• PROJ£CT..Ng.:.. 27-3:6 PROGRAM FLEMENT: 3CCASE ;JJ.: 23i^ 3»G SAMPLE NO: D IN2RG SOMPL^ NC.: MTCA825
. CJNT^ACT Lai^,iT2-iY(nt;r,iiNic):
, CJNT^ACT Lii>:-<«TJ-i4
_ ;:::;::.•• Si -U s <. S •'.- •••• '•.-
;.i :
- 1
i".^r03T-0T£i*^ *'
RESULTS
0.05U
0.05U
O.OSU
0. 3£U
O.OSU
0 . 0 5 U
O.OSU
0 . 0 5 U
0 . 1 0 U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0 . 1 0 U
0.10U ,
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. SOU
.O.JOU.
l.OU
0. SOU
0. SOU
0.50U
l.OU
0.50U
1 .OU
—
—
0. SOU
0.10U
UNITS
UG/L .
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
tir,/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
ALORIM J
~ HEPTACHL'OR — — <
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-3HC
SETA-BHC
GAKMA-tiHC (t'INDANE)
TELf A-RHC
cNDOSULFAN I CALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-uor OTP'-OOT) •'
4,4'-DOE (P,P'-ODE)
«,4'-DDC (P,P'-OOD)
ENDRIN
^NOOSULFAN II CBEfA)
ENDOSULFAN SIJLFATE
CHLORDANE CTECH. MIXTURE) /I
PC?-124? (5RTCLOR 12«2)
PCb-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCE-1221 (AROCLO" 1221)
PCB-1232 (APOCLOR 1232)
PC9-1243 (ARQCLOR 1248)
PCS-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCE-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
ALPHA-CHLORD?ME /2
HETA CHLORDFME /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
1-HYDPQXYCHLORDENF /2
GAI1MA-CHLOPDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLCRDANE /2
CI S-NOMACHLPR /2
flETHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
'
^
7
*
*
'!
M
„
M
"
-
.
.,
rt
M
- i : *J
r, *K,
• i__ivu
-*\'\i.
I I *•
-cSTIMATfj VALUS *N-PRc SUMP TI Vt 6VI3ENCE 0= PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
-ACTUAL VALU£ IS K,\oiJN TO g£ LESS TJAN VALUr GIVEN
Tsrs!i5iH!iGa-4^^j?^if?^^4.5iiilTi^ttT-"jED^TH£j^E
WHEN 1J VULU£
CONSTITUENTS
IS :;r:>CPTED, SEC
CHLQROANF
TECHNICAL
CONSTITUENTS.
HLORDANE.
-------
*•- * * -v » • • v " •
3 i • • - L '- •» '
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
4,4'-ODO
-------
iC' »NAL*STS M.AN6GEM:NT SYSTEM
^'ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
1 STn?. US JEOrfGIS
V,
/
Ob/05/i7 F ;STICI3HS/=C? *S AND OT":» CHLORIN1TEC COMPOUNDS
'.•I4T = <: ......
PROJECT NO.: 27-;*?$ PaOjJ'A"1 cL;P£)iT: RC3A
i J U ? L : : I*, i \i L 3 .. L ;- - I D F V - L .
CITY: car.ccfic STiTf-: uc
*jT&TI)N ;.'..: '/'CM 7 ( "* <<3tv-~n V!:T4LJ
SAMPLE CuLL-.CTIiT,: STJPt D«T?/TIME 03/17/67
SiM?(,r rr,,,i ; r f T itj: CJITA V?PIFIED "Y: CHH
RESULTS
0.05U
Q.05U
0 . 0 5 U
0.05U
0 . 0 5 U
~ ' 0.0 5U
C.05U
o . o ; u
c . i o u
0 . 1 0 U
0 . 1 0 U
0 . 1 0 U
0. 10U .
0 . 1 0 U
0 . 1 0 1 J
0.50U
C . 5 0 U
l.OU
0.50U
0. SOU
0 . 5 0 U ..
1 . OU
0 . 5 0 U
1. OU
—
—
0.50U
0. 10U
UNITS
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U:./L
UC-/L
UC/L
ur,/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ur,/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ur,/L
UG/L
UC./L
UG/L
II '•-/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
ALDSIN J
HEPT4CHLOR >
HJPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
4LPHA-3HC
PETA-BHC
GAMMA-SnC CLINDANE)
DFLT4-BHC
EHCOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELD^IN
4,4'-OOT CF>,P'-ODT)
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DOE)
4t4'-ODD (PtP'-OnO)
FNOSIN
" ENDOSULFAN II C9ETA) '
FNOOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORD4NE CT5CH. MIXTURE) /I
PC?-1242 fAR.TCLOR 1242)
PCR-1254 C4ROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (4ROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PC9-1243 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1250 CAROCLOR 1240)
PC9-1016 (AR3CLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENF
r.HLnR3FNr /2
ALPH4-CHLO"DENE /2
SETA CHLORPENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
1-wvppnXYrHI PROFHF /2
GAMIH-CHLOROANE /2
TR4NS-NOMACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
McTHOXYCHLOR
ENORIN KETQNE
. . . . J
,
^
:
\i
i*
'•
»
„
n
H
;
-
-
i> *:;'*r.03Tn:Tc!
:•::::::;! ^: :::****::::::::::::**::"**
V4LUF ::=N4-N2T 4N1LYIEC
*j-tSTIHATEL; VALUE «N-°RESU^fTIVE EVIPENCE OF PRESENCE Or MATERIAL
SK-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 3? L3SS Tt^AN VALUE GIVEN
_*U-MAT£;f<;AL. 1<(AS-A';ALY.I2a_EJ1..Sljr NOT. :LTECTcO._TJlE__NUH3ER_IS ___
Tn: -Tvll'-ur-. ;-J4NTITATION LlrTT.
1. Wri.M -C ViL'J: IS Pf PC' Tcl', S r.r CHLO°DtNE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUifHS OR KETAECLITrs 0= TgCrt'lICAL CHLOPOANE.
-------
X
.; ANO ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
' ATHENS ''i?3PGIA
/
03/05/87 ^ESTICI"11 S/PC' *S ANO OTHER CHLDRINATEO COMPOUNDS
'' i SAMPLE !JO.: S7C16597 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
j • PS3JECT.MO. : 37-'J24 _FAaflJ>AK_ Ei_=M£WT : RCRA
..sju^ct: !->:riaRAL ^ s OFVFL.
CiT<5 ' "1'^'"Jr3 STATC> NC
• STATIJ'J .l.J. : T-:i?..3L.«JL_tOJISS!}LVE_D_.'-.. .. .
; . STOi<£T STrf T :cvl i.3
' SAMPLc COLLECTIj:! STAPT OATE/TI^c 03/11/37
:-SAi1PL£ C^LLiCJI'J'i STD.P aAl£/ITf!: 20/00/00
: COLLECT^:) CY: c P MJ--TT:- sECFivsr1 FROM:
iA'-lf-L: R;C'L: DAT /TIi".c 00/00/OC iEC'D 3Y:
''CHEMIST: c H H
' ANALYTICAL METHOD
.. CrtSs^iJp. : v5p?s T?J 5ir'1fvJ-£ "•'?•' C IM07G SAMPLE NO.: MOQA847
i'CJNT-JACf LAs"; AT'J^ Y( INORGAMIC) ! CEtJTEC
i . K c M A R K :
;=• SAMPLE Lju v = ^Trr-o HY: WFP DATS vceiFirr) BY: CHH
i ;,
,:.= :.:^;,U,NV.:,.:
"' 1
-I
„ <:A-AVE?«GE VALUE *'JA-N3T AN6LY26D ^NAI-lN'TERpE'iENCES
• *J-£>riHATEQ VALUE *N-r»cSUHPTl VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
$H-ACTUAL VALJ6 13 KM3'..'N TO K: LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•f— 4U-MATER1AL iJAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT 3CTECTCO. THE NUMBER IS
THE flNIMJM JUAMTITATION LIViIT.
1. rfrttN NO VALL'i IS 9 = PORTcDi SEE CHLORDAME CONSTITUENTS. ' ' ,
2. CONSTITUcNTS 0^ ME T 4EOLIT5S Oe TECHNICAL CHLOROANE. • '•
RESULTS
O.Of U
0.05U
0.05U
n n c M
0.35U
0. 05U
0.05U
0 . 0 5 U
0. 10U
o.iau
0. 10U
0.10U
0.10U
C.10U
0.50U
0.50U
3 .OU
C.50U
0. 50U
0.50U
l.OU
0. 50U
1. OU
—
--
0. ?OU
0. 10U
UNITS
, UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
U'./L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
ALORIN
HEPTACHLOR ^
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIOE
"ETA-6HC
GA^MA-SHC (LINDANE) :
DELTA-'JHC
ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
_CIELD(?IN
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-OOT)
4|4'-DOE (P«P'-DDE)
4,4'-DOD (PfP'-DDO)
^NDRIN
PNOOSULFAN 11 (BETA)
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
PC^-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-12S4 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) /
PC8-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCE-1243 (AROCLOR 1249)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCP-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHFNE
ALPHA-CHLOROENE /2
BETA CHLOROEME /2
GAHMA-CHLOROENE /2
1-HYDROXYCHLQRDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-N3NACHLOR /2
METHOXYCHLOR
ENORIN KETONE
,
J.
.>
'
•
*
..
t»
:
»
~*
•
':
-
••
M
-------
1°LF AN3 ANALYSTS !* ANA3EKE -JT SYSTEM
iv
sCii?:-.::::* ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
f 1
'Oc/05/27 PcSTICirES/PCH'S AMD CT^fR CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
.j a 1 = R
' i SA'6LEN;).:i:7C16e33 SA.-1PLr.TYPE:BLKKA..
•PROJECT riG.l 'T-'-'b PROGRAM 5L??FNT: Rr.RA
i ., SJ'J^Cc: ^I'icPiL I-1: o CEVri..
1 , CIT r : GU\CJ^: STATS: NC
'•STATIC! I.-.: i!Lr-; -LANK, f 0 I S < ' I V != H ^ - T i 1 )
S T J < ; T ST^TIO^I j J :
•"SAXPLE COLLcCTUM: STA5T CAT7/TIVE 03/17/E7
. • SA/'.PLt C:LLICTI-N: .STQF.__ DiTr/Tii-1' oo/a.)/co
! ,
coLLe:rL.T .-v: ^ ^..U:-TTE P=C"IVFO FROM:
''S.;.HL£ ^;C';: ujT;/T[y- 00/00/33 -'=C'D 3 Y :
'cH-.i:sr: Chh
• A.NULYT ICAL METH^^:
CAsa hi.: :36J a?o SA".PL: \:: a ric'G SAMPLE NO.: P.OQASSO
cj<.'r»j:r L-_.')-'ATn';Y(3!:;&A'iiC):
; CCNT«A:T L « f. jtMTJ^rci.N ORGANIC): CE^TEC
. K;: -HRK :
RESULTS
O.OSU
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
n.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
ll
—
--
0.
0.
osu
05U
osu
osu
05U
osu
osu
10'J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10'J
5 Oil
SOU
ou
sou
sou
sou
ou
ou
sou
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/I
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
'IG/i
U&/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1 1 G / L
UG/L
'JC-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
ALDRIN J
HEPTACHLOR S
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE !
ALPHA-BHC
fiETA-SHC
GCMV1A-BHC CLINOANE)
PELTA-BHC
ENDOSULFAN I CALPHA)
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-OOT)
4,4'-ODE (P,P'-OOE)
4,4'-DDD CP,P'-OOD)
ENDOSULFAH II (3ETA)
ENCOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDANE CTECH. FIXTURE) /I
PTp — 1?4J (ARnCLClR 1242)
»Ce-1254 (ARTCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PC!-1232 CAROCLOS 1232)
PCB-124S fARnrtDR 1?431
PC?-1260 (AROCLCR 1260)
PC"-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TDXAPHENe
ALPHA-CHLOROENE /i
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLO'OENc /2
I-HYDROX YCHI 0*i)FNp /I ,,,,.,
r.Af';*A-CHLOclD4NE /2
TRANS-N3NACHLaR /2
ALPHA-CHLOROANE /2
METHOX YCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
i
M
»
n
'• SA.>lPL=__La& ..VI ?. I F J£ 2 _fi.Y .:_>.'.= P_._
"ij':
." P:U7
V1LU; *'JA-NOT A^jALYi'D «NA I-IMTERFER ENC FS
sO-cSTI.XATECl ViLUS «N-PRES'J"PT; VF EVIDENCE QP PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
VALUE IS KNOWN TO 3£ LESS THAM VALUE GIVEN
L -,nAi-AMAtiZ_E5_c-a2..LUI-.?:flI_0 = T£CTED^_THE_J4UM3£R_lS
THc ^Ii.I"j;-; iUAUT ITAT I0\ L I '•' '. T .
_ _ _ _
*IM>:M NJ viLu; is REPORT?::, s?3 CHLJRCA^E CONSTITUENTS.
CO'JSTITUf'ITS J? flETArCLITtS Cj = TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
D
SAMPLE At-D ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Epfl-asc-f REG iv
, ATHcNS '.BORGIA
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
#
['03/05/37 PESTICIO£S/DC?'S ANO 9THP5_CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
:-'PL= NQ.:
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
PROJECJLtta. ;_2JL=j;a
.SOURCE: MIVr^iL V "r I Di'VrL.
i CITY: ca'JC'.jKC
_P_E.a&a-A.a_f' fMFMT! RCRA
STITE: tic
,-¥.70 MEJAL
STATION I.D.:.. T'lit:} JJLfi.iiK.C;:!
STQRiT STATi;.>: il2:
SAMPLE CJLLLCTi:.'.: STAPT OATr/TIME 03/17/87
•SAHPLt_C:LUt(,TIiiri.l_iJj.P DAJJL/T IMs QQ/JJJ1/J)!L
C3LL:CTiJ tY: r P^^UiTTE R!
'^A'.PLr REC'l,: DATf/ri.'' PO/00/00
•SiALiU: .
FR1".:
RfC'D BY:
- ' CHEMIST: cur-
N3: T "2'ji'j ".HJ iJ,-'FL= 'NT
' C J N T f i C T L •• d :. -7 : ; j -; Y ( ;) ? L- A N I C j :
Cj JTtfiCT L4t :rArL^UI'NC«-,i-i:C
P INOSG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA851
: CF^JT5C
RESULTS
0.05.1L
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U.
0.05U
0.05U
O.ObU
n.lOLL
0. 10U
0 . 10 U
0.10U
0.10U.
0. 10U
0. 10U
0.50U
Q.50J.L
l.OU
0. SOU
0.50U
0.50L
l.OU
0.50U
l.OU
, R £ 1 A H K :
S c MA K ^ :
"0. STlfD"
0.10U
UNITS
_JC/l_
UG/L
UG/L
UC-/L
_UG/l_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
^JG/L_
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JJC ._
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JJG/L-
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UC __
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
_UG/L_
UC-/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"UG/L"
UG/L
COMPOUND
_A LPRIN
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIOE
ALPHA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
DELTA-BHC
ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
4,4'-DOT TPTP'-DOT)
4,4'-ODE (P|P'-ODE)
4,4'-DDO (PfP'-DDO)
_E.N D RIN , ,
ENOOSULFAN II (B?TAl
FNDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
J_CAROCLOR_1242)
~PCB-i254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
-HfcttSHHUStBHiiK-
PC3-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHFNE
/I
HLPHA-CHLORDENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLQPDENE /2
1-HYDROXYCHLOROlNg /2
G'A'MMA-CHLOROANE /2
TRANS-NOfJACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLCPDANE /2
CIS-NOM4CHLQP /2
~M:THOXYCHLOR
ENORIN KETONE
.i .LOi.-.VER;=I:.a_-SY_:_WZP_
)_Ajj_vi_R_iFieo FY; CHH_
UrUOTiJC-T-l
—?.tif=*ttr~k!ik\:iiTD WNTI-INTE^ERENCE^
:::N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
,i VALUE
sIl-fcSTI'lATEJ VU'Jfc
*K-ACTtjML VALU: IS
"** THt MlNI>'Uri!
-------
r
i
i
• 0 i/05/37 F'CST
i ,
• PRQJECJ HC.:
"CIT?: CJ^COKC
•• i T A T 1 3 't I . ? . :
: " SA/PL: C2LLEC
,•• 3AKP.Lc_COLLEC
'COLLECT-: t t :
'" S •».•'»'..(. ":<**
UNITS
UG/L
UG7I
UG/L
' UG/L
... UG/L .
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
' UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
.UG/L _
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ur./L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
• UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
' ' r r •••;••
1NALYTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND
A L 0 R I N • J
HEPTACHLDR ~" \
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC
. BETA-BHC
GAKMA-3HC CLINDANE)
DELTA-BHC
E'IDCSULFAN I (ALPHA)
OIELORIN
4,4'-OOT (P.P'-DDT)
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-ODE)
4,4'-ODD (P,P'-OOD)
.. ENDRIN
ENOOSULFAN !I fSETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLOROANE (TECH. MIXTU'RE) /I
PCS-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PC3-1254 (6'OCLOR 1254)
PC3-1221 (AR1CLOR 1221)
PC3-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PC9-1243 (AROCLOR 1248)
PC3-1260 (AROCLOR 1240)
PCS-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TO
-------
S'irLH tND ANALYSIS MANAGFMZNT SYSTEM
:::ft*<:*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
D
< \.
- , OJ/05/37 P
t .
EPA-tSDtRFG IV
ATffN3 3EORC-!2
ESJICIDES/OCSS ANALYSIS, MISC
'JATA PEP^RTING SHE5T
WATER
*|'' SlMPLr :JO.: S7C16532 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
1 l
. ' STATION I.D. : t-.'.LL
S TO RET jThTICn in:
^
"SAMPLE CCLLcCTIO'j:
- 'COLLECTED SY o ?i
" SA IPLjj ?£C*0 DATE
L DfVfL.
STATr: NC
1 CnT'^TLVEO YfTAL)
STAPT DATr/TlMf 03/16/87 '.
OUcTTi ;.FCCIVE? FRP«:
i/Tire OO/DO/OU ?rC'o SY:
RESULTS
O...SUJ
O.SUJ
O.SUJ
O.SUJ
0. 5UJ
0.?UJ
0. 5UJ
0. SUJ
O.SJJ
O.SUJ
O.SUJ
l.CU
0.1U
0.2U
1.0'J
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
2.3,7,3 TCDO CDIOXIM) J>
TlTRACHLORODTBENZODIOXIfT fT3T4L) %>
PENTACHLOROOIBENZODIOXIN CTOTAL)
HEXACHLOROOIBENZOniOXTN CTOTAL)
HHPTACHLORODIPENZOOIOXIN CTOTAL)
OCTACHLOROOIBENZODIOXIN
2,3,7,8 TCDF C C I" EN ZOCURAN)
T=TPACHLGROOIBENZOFU?AN CTOTAL)
Pc^T ACHLCRQDI? ENZOFUR AN CTOTAL)
HEXACHLORODISENZOFURAN CTOTAL)
HFPTACHLOROOIRENZOFURAN CTOTAL)
3CTACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN
2,4,5-TP
2,4,5-T
CHLOP02ENZILATE
PHQRATE
;DISULFOTON
.PARATHION
FAt'.PHUR
' ANALYTICAL ti TH3U:
i,,CASfc N'O.: 23 J_ T>
i Si'-'PLE MO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA822
Y(3 —
t . .
* "! . ", , •::
M
'
',. ' "'ftA-AVikAti VAL'J
, «J-cSTIHAT: j VJ'.
«K-ACTUAL VALUE
ftL-ACTUAL VtLU?
- ;"; ' THE LSTiMurio
• " t
ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft :': ft ft ft :•: ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft
; *'JA-l>m ANALYZED ftN A I-INTEP.FE RENC E S
(j-. ftN-PRCSUMPTIVE EVIDEMCF OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
IS KNOWN TO 5= LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
IS KM"! UN. T0.3E GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN ' .'.'> .'.
Ar.JLYZSO SQR 2UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
•iiN'i'-'u;' OUANTITATIQN LIMIT.
,_
1 *
-------
AND ANALYSIS PANAGEMEMT SYSTEM
;PA-L$C,CEG IV
AThEUS GEORGIA
03/05/37
P£STICIOES/BC»S ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WJTTR
0
SV'FL" NO.: S7Clf592
S»K°LE TYPE: &ROUNDHA
Pfi0 JECjr_NC ,.v.J.7.-?• l fi. PROGRAM _ELEMENT: PCRA_
'cur: CJNCCK:" " * "" ' ' STATE: NC
'STATION I.j.: r.'-LL. .;. C."IS5.C.LVcD '-'fTAD
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START OATE/TI^E 03/17/e?
- SA--lpLc_COLLlCTIO;j:._ST3P OATE/TIMF 00/00/00
RESULT'S
0.5UJ ,
•OY5U3—
0.5UJ
UJ
•Mi—
0. 5UJ
0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
0.5t)J~~~
0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
fci»—
0.2U
1 .CU
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
«:***ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
2tSi7,8 TCDD CDIOXIN).
"7 Fmt HUD TO DTB E M Z QTJ7 OXIN CT'OT»LJ
PENTACHLORODIBENZOOICXIN (TC
HEXACHLORODIBENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEPTJCHLOP.ODI9ENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
'CCTACWUORODT5tNZODinXTN~~
2,3.7,8 TCDF (C IBENZOFURAN)
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
PENTACHLOROOIPENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
"HEX«CHLOROOIBENZOCUPAN TTOTAU)
HEPTACHLORODI9ENZ3FURAN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLOR 0013ENZOFURAN
2,4-D .,..
"2.4, ;-rp
2,4,5-T
CHLOROEENZILATE
PHORATF
"DISULFQTOKi
PARATHION
FAKPHUR i
! ' i A .-1 r L = %cC'i: 0 ; 7 : , / T 11', E 03/00/00
I "oilLii: . .
— ' C H : »I 3 T :
RFC'O BY:
Si^NJ.: ;3ii U^u SAMPLE NO: D I'ICRG SAMPLE MO.: MDQA854
'CJ-M TRACT LAS-3-;»TOf'Y(l\iCSC-A\IC): CFNTEC
k£MA3K. : " " ~ ' " ~
SAMPLE. LOG VEKIFI;Q BY; WFP DATA..y.F^i.F-j,m_Bl-i_x.!tH-
:'.! ^:|: RE MASK. S ::::'.:::--
, I
—• , :.: *:!: t? •'.::'.: if:.:?:-., rt:.::;::;:: /::;.-;. :J:;::;::;: !|: •;: ft:): ft ftft ft #:;::): ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft jj ft ft ft ft ft ft ft if ft ft ft
1
•liA-AVL^ioF VALUE
SJ-cSTI/.ATCD VJLUE
::NA-NHT ANALYZED *NA I-INTERF E R ENC c S
M-PRESUCPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
VH-ACTUAL VALU^ is KNOWN TD ^F LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
$L-ACTUAL. V4LUiI-IS-JUiQHit-TQ_a£.. CREATES THAN VALUE GIVEN '__ '
*U-.vATiii!AL /IA5 ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
., i The ISTIHATCO MINIMUM 'JUANTITATION LIMIT.
I i
-------
r
SAMPLE- A.NO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYS'TFM
E'A-E^D.RrG IV
OB/05/d7 PES.TICir£S/PC3S ANALYSIS, MISC
' DATA REPORTING SHEET
VilTfR
S1M3L£ MO.: 87C165S3 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
' PJIQJ = CT UQ.J 37_-3.'5 PjfQGRAM CLCMCNT! FTRA
,. S J u T\ c c : :-, ; tj i R A L * -J i 0 F v 5 L .
,,C:TY: CONCOPC STAT-: NC
• c T \ I I u N. ' ' * '~'l 3 C^ISSQIV'O MfTAL)
.CTJRfT S T h T I J .i • K? :
"SAMPLE CCLLLCTID,-!: 5TAf.T DATE/TIME 03/16/87
"bAIPL- f 11 1 EC T I ^ ••': $T2P PAT5/TIME QO/GQ/on
'COLLECTED tv: ; PA3U£TT5 RKEIVEC FROM:
' SA(-'I?LC ^.C'L: ri.r;,/Tii-£ oo/oo/oo SEC D BY:
'CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
,,c= ONA-MOT AMftLYZEP *NAI-INTERFERENCES
*J-cST'KATtC ViL'J^ «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
': ::=K-ACTUAL VALUc IS KNOWN TO bE LtSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
*•! -'it fl^Tiili \, :. t M e T^ Kfjn'^N Tn °F (iffFAT'R THAN VAIIIF GIVEN ^
*U-:-iATcRIAL ,Jti ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE LSTIMiTi'O MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
\
RESULTS
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5LJJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
l.OU
0.1U
0.2U
l.OU
5. OU
5.0U
5.0U
20U
.;-
';
*****ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
2,3.7,8 TCOO (OIOXIN) J
TETRACHLdRODIBENZOOIOyiM (TtJfAL) >
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEX4CHLOROOTBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
H=PTACHLOROOieENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBEN70DIOXIN
2,3,7,8 TCDF (D ISENZOPURAN)
TF.TRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
P?NTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
HCXACHLOROOIBENZOFUPAN (TOTAL)
HEPTACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) .
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,4-0 • .
2,4,5-TP
2,A,5-T i
CHLOROEENZILATE
PH1PATF
DISULPOTON
PARATHION
FAMPHUR
i
.':" . 'i1.
: — ( ! —
\
^
-------
i-IPLE a'.D ANALYSIS ("ANAGrMENT SYSTEM
?°A-;SP.PEG :v
ATHENS GE3RGIA
*<:*<<*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
•*
»
•
•*
*v
•X
*s
^
^l
»
»
, (H/05/37 PESJICIDES/PCBS ANALYSIS, PISC
OATi 1EPSRTING SfftT
wlT^R
S'U.PL" NO.: S7C16E90 SAVPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
• PROJECT _N3. : 37-315 Pp.OORM ELEM?«JT: RCRA
., i J U * C c : f-' I M : - A L R = t n f V : L .
„ CITY : :ON;'J'-;.: STIT^: NC
• iTJScT » Fi Ti jij Uj:
"SdMPL= C:LLLCTION: STAKT DATE/TIME 03/17/97
•SAMPLE. C5LLtC_TIJ>j: STJP. LATt/TI^E OQ/OT/00
'C'JLL£CTJ1 rY: P 'AJUtTTE ^EC'IVEP FFTM:
SW-IPLc. RjC't! J J T •: , / T I " i: 00/00/00 ^FC'C BY:
' ANALYTICAL McTnDO:
»c«st N..: 2.oj :-•:.:- SA"PLE N:: D IMORG SAMPLE NO.: KOQA352
CONTRACT LAo^."!ATJ"'Y(ar ns;o,NIC) : C-NTFC
M
"REMARK:
>• , "*
•1
»> J
„ j
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
. 0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
...0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
l.OU
0. 1U
0.2U
l.OU
5.0U
5.0U
3.0U
20U
T ^fttCBrWBPrmmYSTiN aoTtL? 1
PENTACHLOROOIBENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEXACHLOPODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEPTACHLOROOIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TCOF' (OI9ENZOFURAN)
TETRACHLOROOIBENZTFURAN (TOTAL)
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOT4L)
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN
2,4,5-TP ' '
2,4,5-T i
CHL3R09ENZILATE
OISULFOTON
PARATHIOM
FAMPHUR '
I
— ' _ <:i*S:i;«*.-::*ti ::-.:;::! :•:.•:!•, •:::::::::;:::::': *::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::*!:::;::::::::;::::::::;:::;::::::::: ififififtfifififififififififffif
*i-iStlhA'f ;0 VALUE *N- P^ fSUMP T I VE ' E V10 E NCE ' OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
-sK-ACTUAL VALU5 IS KM'JW'J TO f-F LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
" " " " .G.S£AJ££_T
•^U-'UTtKlAL .JA5 ANALYZED F.T5 ?UT MOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
Tnc i.TIKATtO "INIKiJM OUANTIT 4 TION LIMIT.
-------
ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E=A-fS?,REG IV
***«*ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
J
"V
_
•»
Oi/05/37 ?
I .
J
• PROJECT NO. : 47-22
... ijjtCc": ~viM=T;aT ~?.~
,. CITY: C:NCUJ
0. 5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0. 5UJ'
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ '
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
l.OU
0.1U
0.2U
l.OU
l.OU
5.0(1
5.0U ,
20U
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
2.3,7,8 TCOD (DIOXIM) J
PENTACHLORODIRENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEXACHLORODIPENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEPTACHLCRODIBENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
OCrACHLOROOTSENZDDIOyi'J "
2,3,7,3 TCOF ( DI3 ENIOFURAN)
TETRACHLORODISENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
PFNTACHLORODHENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
HEXACHLOHOOIBENZD^URAN (TUTAL) — "~
HEPTACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLORQDIBENZQFURAN
2,4-D
•2,4,5-TP
2,4,5-T
CMLOR03ENZILATE
PHQRAT5
DISULFOTOM
PARATHION
FAHPHUR 1
-^•"CJLLECTED ^Y: o PAQUETTE S'C^IVEI FROM:
. ' oA.-i^Lc =.:'C'Ci: OATs,/TIMF CO/00/?9 RcC'D BY:
•*
^
~
'CHEMIST:
"ANALYTICAL KETM2D:
,,CASE tj;.: 2363 u?
CONTRACT LAiOiiATd
"CONTRACT LibJP.ATJ'r
«£MARK 1
V
' SAMPLE L03. V£slcl^
*'
i
•*='=*FG3n.:iu :=•:=•==•;
Y(lN?SGaniC): CHrjTfC
-
«
^fl-tVrtAGh VSL'JS «NA-N3T ANALYZED *NAI-IMTERFERENCES
*J-cSTIrf«T£D VALUE *'J-Pf?E SUMPTI V£ EVIDENCE 3F PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
i :::K-ACTUAL VSLUc IS KN3«N TC fcP LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• _ A'L-ACTLUL VJLUi IS K.NQXM TO £F GREOT^?__THAN VALUE GIVEN • .•;>•:
.! »U— v-ATtRIAL to*i
., ! T,-c -STIM^TtJ
AN4LYI=0 FOR PUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMB5R IS
1I.N:'--UM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
l
/ .
" " ' 1
— ' ' ' i
• ' 1
!
<•
1 , —
.
't
•I
t
-^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
r\
^
^
"\
-------
•!•
S4-'DL = AND AN-iLYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E°A-jSC,RfG IV
n T H = •* S GEORGIA
»
y
08/3S/s7
iJUXCC :""
CITY : CO
SAMPLE C
1
? : s/T i c i o E
DAT
SAMPLE NO
MINE SSL f'z L OEV-L
K C 0 K D
S/PCBS ANALYSIS, MISC
^ ' W&TER * ' " . .
.: 67C1*,585 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOW4
STATE; Nc
CLLECTI3M: STAPT DATE/TIME 03/17/87
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
YluJ— i
.5UJ 1
.5UJ 1
. fUJ _ 1
; 5uj (
. suj ;
. 5UJ
. C-UJ 1
.5UJ 1
.5UJ 1
.5'JJ i
IlU 1
. 2u ;
. CU (
5.0U , 1
5.0U 1
20U f
~ , COLLECT;j tY:
;'I ^« J
r^G 3 AMPLE Nn: c
; -< Y c r - r- u v i c ) :
:'YCI.'J 0*04^10: CENT EC
IMC»G S'AMPLE
SY; Wep DATA VERIFIED 9Yt CHH
***** ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
\
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
TCDO (DTOXIN)_
E N z o o i oy'
PENTACHLOROOIBENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEX4CHLOROOIBENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEPTACHLOROOIBENZJOIOXIN CTOTALJ
DCTACHLORODIBENZOCIOXIN
2,3,7,6 TCDF (C 15 FNZOFURAN) .
T5T^ACHLOP.ODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
PENTACHUCROfmr^ZOFURaN (TOTAL)
hrXACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN^'TOTlL)
HEPTACHLORDOIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLOPOOIBENZOFURAN
,4, 5-T .
CHLCR03ENZILATE
CISULCOTON
PARATHIQN
FA^PHUR
^ :;: :|: :|::.! :'f .f f. ;::.: %.;: -.; \: f.::'.: -;::;::!: •;::;: -J;.::.::':;!::)! -': :|: •::;;:::: ••-.:':;;; •)::;: T|: ::;:;::;::;: -;::;:;;::;: £,;: .;,.•, ^ ft $ ^. ,J ^,.;.:;.:;:.;:.;;.;.....;....
• VvVT:UJf iJI^i"*': ...
*A-AtfcrfAGc VALUE *NA-NOT AN1LYZEO *NAI-INTERF£RENCES
' j MJ-ESTIKATSD VALUE SN-PRSSUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
I.! ;:!*-4CTUiL VfiLj: IS KNOWN TC ?E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
I-! *U-M«Tt^:AL )iAS J'iALYZEO FGR Tut NOT oTT?CT?n. THE NIl'MSFR TS
-
_ »AS J'iALYZcO FGR ?UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER
TriE £STI'-'«TC3 MINIMUM QUAMTITA TION LIMIT.
-------
? AND ANALYSIS NAN AC^M "NT SYSTEM
ct)M-ESC,«t:.G !V
ATt-EKS G30SGIA
/C'f'
08/05/37
PES/TICIOES/PCBS ANALYSIS, MISC
' DATA 3EFGPTING SHEET
SAMPLE N3.: 87C16594
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNflWA
\' pR3jECJ_.ua^i_
-;: VIUE?4L
II,,CITY: CONCUR
DEVtL.
STATE: NC
STAliaM-I.:;.: WML - fc.T ?: if * ft ft ft ft ft
vA-AViKA&L VALUE SNA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES
*J-=STIHATfcD VALUE ftN-PRESUMPT IVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
=;=K-ACTL6L VALUE IS I"I3^'I TO 8- LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
_.__-_...-__.
lAL *'AS ANALYZhO FCR "JUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE tSTlHSTcO MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
lPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-SSD.RFG IV
, ATHENS GEORGIA
CS/05/d7
PES/TICIDES/PCBS ANALYSIS, MISC
' DATA °£PORTING SHEET
• W ATE R
SA.'',PL£ NO. : S7C36593
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOtfA
•PROJECT MC. : 67-
..SOURCE: in^itT
CITY: CO.JCOKD
^rrwT"
. ELEMENT ; RCRA
STATE: NC
"SAMPLE COLLECTIO
N: STAPT DATE/TIME 03/13/37
oo/03/ao
COLLECT''-:: 11: r, 1-1 IU^TTC ^=CEiVE2 =ROK:
o->i?Lc -i.-CT: J'^T^ ,/TI'-'E 00/00/00 ^tC'
BY:
ft****ANALYTiCAL RESULTS*****
\
RESULTS IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
0.5UJ 2,3L?j?_TC_qp CDIOXIN)
O.SUJ PENTACHLOROOiBENZODIOXIN CtOTAL)
0.5UJ HEXACHLORODIBENZOOIOXIN CTOTAL)
_0.5UJ h^?TACHLORODIBENZOOIQXIN CTOTAL)
0T5UJ- OCTACHLORODISEN~ZOT)I05l09GAfilC) : CcNTEC
..DATA VFPTFTFn aY! THH
.._
*«-AVJNiGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES
vJ-eSJjMATEi; VaLUE »N-PRE SUM'-TI VE EVIfENCF OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-6CTUAL VALUH IS KNJWN TO -? LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
_S'L-ACTUAL _VAL'J-LJ^_imaaN.JH-.aE_GR£ATEP_nUN-.VAUJE.j;iyEN
*U-KATcRlAL WAS A'.ALYZfD eOR HUT MOT DETECTED. THE NUMSPFTS
THc cSTIf-AT£0 MINIMUM QUANTIT4TION LIMIT.
-------
-> s
S4"PLt AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS GEORGIA
. \
r*~
•V 03/05/Df ?£STICIOES/PCBS ANALYSIS, K1SC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
»''
SAI'.PL? NO.: 37Cli586 SAMFLc TYPE: GROUNDWA
*
'•PRajcCT NG.: g7-32& PRD5.RAM ELFMe,NT: RCRA
I.SQUSCt: MINIMAL ^ I GEVrL.
•» ,,cirr: CJUCO-JD ^TATE: NC
•STATI"M 1-1.: K"L'S 7 f r>I SSTI-VF1 f''.cTAL)
"SAMPLE C2LLiCTI3'j: START DATE/TIME 03/17/B7
•SAi'-'^it" rri^jTinN: STGP OATC/TIMC on/no/oo
-^ '' COLLECTED =Y: f P50U=TTE RECEIVED FROM:
• ' j (t M ? L i ^;C'b: D4T:,/TINE 00/00/50 RFC'O BY:
|" ANALYTICAL METH30:
! i
LCiSc MU.: 23i3 ORG S»"PLE NC: C INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDQA846
•«. CJNTRuCT LJ3Pr tfl
i* "• ' •'
/ . **
.', 1 „ , " "'•' ' Jf
-------
SA'-IPLE AND ANALYSTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
E?fi-£ S:,RCG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
I
~ ; 03/05/57
PSS.TICIDES/PCPS ANALYSIS, MISC
' DATA REPORTING SHEET
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16S87
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
I . ' . -
!.. SOUSCt: t-\l^l^~(r^: I 0:Vcl.
, j,. tiTY: CONCOKO STATE: NC
f'STATIQ.'l I.C.: .T.;l:t'.-aLfiN!t_XailS-QLy£.Il_aiXAJD
! .. S T 3 * i T i T A T I J '.' '!: :
i"SAMPLE CCLLE:TIO\: STKRT DATE/TIME 03/11/87
i"3AHP.L£_CJLLiCJIC-i:_iIIif CATg/TIM; 03/03/00
RESULTS
JLJUJ.
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
J.5UJ
0.50J
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
.1..0U
0. 1U
0.2U
l.OU
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
ftftftftftANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
IN: UG/L COMPOUND NAME
2.3.7.8 TCDD tDIOXIN)
TETRACHLOROOI3ENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
_
OCTACHLCRaDiaENZOOIOXrN
2,3,7,8 TCDF (OISENZOFURAN)
TETPACHLORODI3ENZOFURAN CTOTAL)
J>ENTAC.HLORODlBENZDfURAN_jCTOrALl
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLOKODieENZO^URAN
2,4,5-T
CHLOR03ENZILATE
_P"ORAT_E
DISULFOTON
PARATHION
F A M P H U R
r :
00/50/31
REC'D BY:
"• '• CHEMIST:
|"ANALrilCAL
. _ NO.: 2:53 J-!G SAMPLE NO: C
-> i CO.JTkftCT LAf3SATO'!Y(3RGANIC):
'^CC.NTKACT LflBO^ATa'YdNORGANIC): CENTEC
i« K E :< A~»'<.": ~" '" " ~~ "
~* i REMARK:
INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA947
"SAHPL£_LQG_VER]
)ATA VFP
i
;:;;::;: if if :'.s:): :|: ?: :X ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft:)::;: :|t ft
«A-avtPibE VALUE
SJ-ESTIMATEO V1LUE
*N4-.\'nT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFER ENCFS
CM-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL V*LU= IS KNOWN TJ BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
-
«U-,VATCKIAL >vas ANALYZED FOR ?UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER is
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
D
5J.-<:>LE AND tllALYSTE i-IAN AGENENT SYSTEM
E?A-iiJ,R5G IV
; ATHENS GEORGIA
-> dd/05/31
Pr-STICIDES/PC?S ANALYSIS, MISC
I DATA aEPO'TIMG SHCET
U 1 T = R
SA"PL:? NO.: STCllSiS
SAMPLE TYPE: SLKUA
PR 0 J E CJ_f! Q..J £7-^j
CITY: CQNcdfO
PROGRAM ELEMENT: RC3A_
rvsL.
ST-T^: NC
s T A T i cn, i. E' .: .:-.-: LJ 5. _= L AM< (DISSOLVED METAL)
'SAMPLE CGLLcCTION: STA9T DATE/TIME 03/17/87
1 S »'. P_L E._C C L i.'. C.T 13II j SJ 3P DATE/TIME 00/00/00
'CCLL-CT;L =• Y : ^ i-jJUrTTt RFCrlVED FROM:
'iA^LL SCC'u: T^Ti./TI-C 00/00/01 REC'D BY:
,3£AL£^: ___ . .
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL n.T^DL:
cAsL N":.: ;:ji-J J^"".~STMPLE NO: D
'CJ'.T^ACT LA^r^ATOTY (ORGANIC.:
r LAB'J-COT: -N6LYZEO ^OR HIJT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
TflE cSTIMUTED MI.\IMUH Q'JANTIT ATION LIMIT.
-------
f
i
! SAMPLE Artl
i V
Od/05/27 °? STIC I!
3 ANJLY
ATh?
STS
NS <
MANAGEMENT
;?3a&il
)ES/?CaS ANALYSIS.
SYSTEM
MISC
RESULTS
0.5UJ
olsijj
**
IN
P
***ANAl
: UG/L
,3,7.9
ETSTCHT.
ENTACHl
.YTICAL RESULTS*****
COMPOUND NAME
TCDD (DIOXIN)
rtrRTjoT
.OROO]
[ y cN i 00 1 u X IN (To
[3ENZODIOXIN (TO
TAL J *
TAD
f^f
Od/05/27
t . •
1
' • PROJECT NO. :
;''cir»:"cj:;c.3!'
• • STATION^ I .0.
, " SaMPLE CCLLE
'••SAMPLE CCLLt
I'tJLLECTED I-Y
j"S&MPLc
*•
^
^
f*
^
^
^
^
s*
^
^
^
**
-------
E AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EP4-?SDtPEG IV
GEORGIA
***«ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS IN: UG/L
COMPOUND NAME
»
•%
s /
/*
03/05/37 PSi/TICISES/PCBS ANALYSIS, MISC
' DATA RtPcmiNG SHEET
// a T ; R
SAMPLE HJ.: S7Clt?20 SAMPLE TYPE: ELA.'JK
FR3JHCT NC.: £7-324 oq^GPA" ELEMENT: RCRA
S 'J U -v C i : M \ i f1 * L ° i C 0 £ V r L .
cirr: :jfjcoo STAT?:: NC
STATIC I.'.'.: -l-i-K
s T o •< £ r s : •. T ; Q j i j :
SAMPLt CCLLcCTIu'i: START DATE/TIME 03/16/37 0900
SAMPLE C'ULiCTITj: STOP DATE/TI""E 00/00/00
£A-:?LC ' v:c 'ji C;T:,/T:«F oo/oo/od " REC"*C "?Y:
5 s a •, ;• t :
CHEMIST:
ANdLYTICfiL STTHOC:
0. 5UJ
O.SJJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
O.S'JJ "
0.5IJJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ "
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
l.CU
0.1U
0.2U
l.OU
5.0U
5. 00
5.0U
20U
2 ,3,7,« TCDD (DIOXIN) J
T:T«ACHLOROOIBcNZUUIUXlN UUIAU >
PENTACHLOROOIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEXACHLORQOIBENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
HcPTACHLORODIPENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL)
' OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
2,2,7,S TCOF (DIBENZOFU^AN)
TETRACHLORODIBENIOFURAN (TOTAL)
PEMTACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
' HEXACHLORODIBEN70FURAN (TOTAL)
HEPTACHLORODI9ENZQFURAN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODI8ENZOFURAN
2t4-0
" 2,4,5- TP
2,4,5-T
CHLOROBENZILATE
PH3RATE
DISULCCTON
PARATHION
FAMPHUR ,
CASc i|j.: 2idi IH',3 SAMPLE NO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO.: MOQA856
CU.^rSiCT L»?:^AT J?Y(INC«GANIC): CFNTEC"
K s "! A P < :
REMAPK :
<,a,MPI ? 1 flG VFRTFT?0 BY: MFP DATA VERIFIED BY: CHH
;
L..., ...,..,,,.,.,. .................. .,.,.^....v.,.^...>.^I,.,...,..,.,,....!...,^.,...........,...^!..<1*J5e<1<[!j1-,,.,.<— ^v......ft^.
,.......,,.....
, ft»-AVS:ki5; VALJE vNA-NOT ANAtVrfO " ftN A 1-1 NtERFE R ENCE S
«J-£ST:;iiTEO VALUE ftN-P»ESU1PTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
ftK-ACTUAL VALUc IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
i *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TQ gc GREATER T^AN VALUE GIVEN '.:. .»
' *0-M«TtSlAL JAS ANALYZED'FOS SUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
! THc ESTIKnUD KIMi'J'' QUANTITATION LIMIT. i
< . f
1
•N
]
i»
N
tt
M
H
m
H
It
K
1)
M
M
*4
N
-------
SV1PLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGFMENT SYSTEM
EPA-5SD.REG IV
I AThENS 5fcORGIA
-v I , 03/05/67
' ES/TICIOES/OCBS ANALYSIS, MISC
' 3ATA REPORTING SHEET
___ wAJ i R _
Si'-lPLE NO.: 87C16531
SAMPLE TYP?: PUM°BLK
, • PRJJECT_MQ. :._&7-J24 __ __ P R (3 SJIAM_£ LEHf^lI :_fiCRA
••-SClHCE: ("IM^HL «.- 1 5EV5L.
•» '., CITY: CGNCCKJ STATF: NC
'" STATUS .l.i..: P'J-'3_rLi!!l!L-.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATF/TIME 03/13/87
••>•., CnrniatJ-
I ANALYTICAL
«**:S:::ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS IN: UG/L
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
_0.5UJ
0. 5UJ
0. 5UJ
0. 5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
0.5UJ
_1.0U
0. 1U
2UJ
l.OU
_S.OU
5.0U
5.0U
20U
COMPOUND NAME
cen
(TOTAL)
PENTACHLOROOIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL)
_H?PTACHLOR_aOieE.NZOOIOXIN_iTai»LJL
OCTACHLOROOI9=NZODIOXIN
2,3i7,8 TCDF (OT3ENZOFURAN)
TETRAChLORODIBENZOF'JRAN (TOTAL)
_PENTACHL9.?QDIS;''J:oeURAN_(TOTA. L_)
HEXACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
HEPTACHLORODI3ENZOFURAN (TOTAL)
OCTACHLQRODIBENZOFURAN
_2 , 4-1
2,4,5-TP
2 f4, 5-T
CMLORO?ENZILATE
_PHQ=!AT£
DISULFQTON
PARATHION
FAMPHUR
•<<
' '
NO.: 2?ti T-(0 SAMPLE NO: D
•^ ..CONTRACT LtiO^AT J-'IY(ORGANIC):
; C J N T r. A C T LA = j;iTO-iY(I\cRr, A NIC): CENT^C
INOR5 SAMPLE NO.: MOQA752
, RcMA *K, :
"SAMPLE LQG-V
' (
"I
I- ; _ _ __
e**KOJ7H2rf S:::=:.-;:
-I ;SA-AV£kAOb VAL'J; *NA-:JOT i-'ULYZED
. I *J-CSTIi'iATED V4LIJ-; wN-PRE
SK-ACTUAL VALUi IS
__ __ __ _
#'1 A I-T MTE RFF R ENC E S
SUVFT I VE EVIDEMCP OF FRcSFNCf: TB MATERIAL
TO P5 LESS THAN VALIJP GIVEN
_ =OR 3UT NOT P&TECT3D.
TH£ i:STIf-.MT:D '1IM''''J." OUANTITi TIQN LIMIT.
NUMBER is
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16S66
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE «. OEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: PUMP BLANK
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/18/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO:
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC):
CONTRACT LABORATORY! INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
D INORG SAMPLE NO.
EMSI/COMPU
MOOA752
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••REMARKS*"
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
ANALYTICAL RESULTS*****
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.01U MG/L CYANIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L SULFATE
1.0U MG/L CHLORIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE ' •
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
50U UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
18 UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
1.0U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.02 MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945 i
00940
OO615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
• •FOOTNOTES"*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE -NA-NOT ANALYZED >NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE >N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16567
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO. : 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE S. DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: WELL 1
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/16/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'O: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO:
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC):
CONTRACT LABORATORY!INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
D INORG SAMPLE NO. : MDOA822
EMSI/COMPU
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY:
• ••REMARKS"*
WFP
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
RESULTS
0.01U
1.4
6.6
5.0
0.3U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
50U
5 OU
5U
1.0U
0.03UJ
UNITS
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS""*
PARAMETER
CYANIDE
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
SULFATE
CHLORIDE
NITRITE-NITROGEN
BROMIDE
FLUORIDE
SULFIDES
PHENOLS (4AAP)
TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
O0945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
"•FOOTNOTES'"
•A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED 'NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT. •'•-.-
n
ii
-------
V i
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16568
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO.:• 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE & DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: WELL 3
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION. START DATE/TIME 03/16/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: 0 PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO. : MOOA825
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY!INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
• ••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS""*
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.01U MG/L CYANIDE
180 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
130 MG/L SULFATE
1700 MG/L CHLORIDE
0 3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULF10ES
BOU UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
30UJ UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2.0UJ MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.03UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• "REMARKS*"
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
• ••FOOTNOTES*"
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED >NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-AUUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-AC1UAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
It
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALVSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: B7C16569
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE- MINERAL RE & DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D : WELL 6
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BV: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO. : MDOA826
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY! INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK.
REMARK:
• ••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS'*'"
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.01U MG/L CYANIDE
450 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
41 MG/L SULFATE
10OO MG/L CHLORIDE
0 3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
50U UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
150J UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
82J UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2.0UJ MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.07UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
-/
_•
- -4
' i
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••REMARKS"*
DATA VERIFIED BV: GKB
• ••FOOTNOTES'"
•A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16570
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO. • 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE & DEVEL.
CITY. CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.O.: WELL 5
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY: 0 PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO. : MDOA827
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
•••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS"'"
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.01U MG/L .CYANIDE
1600 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
66 MG/L 5ULFATE
14OO MG/L CHLORIDE
0 3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1 OU MG/L .5ULFIDES
100U UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
60UJ UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L -PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2.0UJ MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.04UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
••'REMARKS*••
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
•*'FOOTNOTES*••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE -NA-NOT ANALYZED 'NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-EST1MA7ED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
(1
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16571
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE «. DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: WELL 7
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO. : MDOA846
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY( INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
• ••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS"'"
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0 01U MG/L CYANIDE
68 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
71 MG/L SULFATE
940 MG/L CHLORIDE
0 3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1 OU MG/L SULFIOES
50U UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
30UJ UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
1.0U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.08UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••REMARKS'"
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
"FOOTNOTES""
•A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED 'MAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-EST1MATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
n
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SVSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO. : 87C16572
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE & DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION 1.0.: TRIP BLANK
STORET STATION NO
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/11/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY: 0 PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST- GKB CHEMIST.
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO. : MDOA847
CONTRACT LABORATORY!ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
'•'••ANALYTICAL RESULTS
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.01U MG/L CYANIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L SULFATE
1.0U MG/L CHLORIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1.OU MG/L FLUORIDE
54 MG/L SULFIDES
SOU UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
20 UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
1.6 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
44 MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••REMARKS"*
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
• ••FOOTNOTES'"
•A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED 'NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-EST1MA7ED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
n
II
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SVSTEH
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALVSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16573
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE t. DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: BAILER BLANK
STORET STATION MO:
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
COLLECTION:
COLLECTION:
START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO REC'O BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG-SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO.: MDOA85O
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY:
• ••REMARKS*"
WFP
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
• ••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS"*"
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0 01U MG/L CYANIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
1 OU MG/L SULFATE
1.0U MG/L CHLORIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
SOU UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
S.OU UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2.9 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.03 MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
••FOOTNOTES*••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED "MAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATEO VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
II
R
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16574
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE- MINERAL RE fc DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION 1.0.: FIELD BLANK
STORET STATION NO.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO. : MDOA851
CONTRACT LABORATORY!ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORYlINORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
• ••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS*"**
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0 01U MG/L CYANIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L SULFATE
1.0U MG/L CHLORIDE
0 3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1. OU MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
SOU UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
7.3 UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
l.OU MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.04 MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••.REMARKS'"
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
•••FOOTNOTES-*'
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED -NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-EST1MATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
. -U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
K
R
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16575
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO : 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE & DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: WELL 4
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY:
SAMPLE REC'D:
SEALED:
D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO REC'D BY:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
CASE NO.: 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO:
CONTRACT LABORATORYCORGANIC):
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.01U MG/L CYANIDE
160 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
74 MG/L SULFATE
16OO MG/L CHLORIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1 OU MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
SOU UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
40UJ UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PVRGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2 OUJ MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.05UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
O0680
CONTRACT LABORATORY( INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
D INORG SAMPLE NO.:
EMSI/COMPU
MDOA852
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••REMARKS'"
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
• ••FOOTNOTES'"
•A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MAURIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESD.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16576
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO. : 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE & DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I.D.: WELL 4
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION. START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY: 0 PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE MO: 0 INORG SAMPLE NO. :
CONTRACT LABORATORY!ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY)INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
..•••ANALYTICAL RESULTS"."
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0 01U MG/L CYANIDE
150 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
73 MG/L SULFATE
1400 MG/L CHLORIDE
0 3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
50U UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
40UJ UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2 OUJ MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.04UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
00945
O0940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
MOOA853
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• •'REMARKS*"
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
••FOOTNOTES'"
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE -N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-AClUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
II
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16577
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO.: 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE & DEVEL
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I D. : WELL 2
STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 03/17/87
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO REC'D BY:
SEALED:
CHEMIST- GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
CASE NO. : 2363 ORE SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE MO
CONTRACT LABORATORY!ORGANIC): EMSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY!INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK.:
REMARK:
MDOA854
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••REMARKS*"
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
• ••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS"*"
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.01U MG/L CYANIDE
24 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
70 MG/L SULFATE
53 MG/L CHLORIDE
0.3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
1.0U MG/L BROMIDE
t.OU MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
SOU UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
20UJ UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
5U UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2 OUJ MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0.04UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
00720
00630
O0945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
.
" I
• ••FOOTNOTES"'
•A-AVERAGE VALUE "NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
(1
(i
-------
09/01/87
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SVSTEM
EPA-ESO.REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO.: 87C16578
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
PROJECT NO. : 87-326 PROGRAM ELEMENT: RCRA
SOURCE: MINERAL RE & DEVEL.
CITY: CONCORD STATE: NC
STATION I D . WELL 6A
STORET STATION NO-
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
START DATE/TIME 03/18/87
STOP DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY: D PAOUETTE RECEIVED FROM:
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY:
SEALED-
CHEMIST: GKB CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL METHOD:
CASE NO. : 2363 ORG SAMPLE NO: D INORG SAMPLE NO. :
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC): EHSI/COMPU
CONTRACT LABORATORY!INORGANIC): CENTEC
REMARK:
REMARK:
• ••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS""*
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.010 MG/L CYANIDE
1100 MG/L NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
90 MG/L SULFATE
2800 MG/L CHLORIDE
0 3U MG/L NITRITE-NITROGEN
l.OU MG/L BROMIDE
1.0U MG/L FLUORIDE
1.0U MG/L SULFIDES
100U UG/L PHENOLS (4AAP)
100UJ UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
EU UG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
2 OUJ MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
0 04UJ MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
STORET
O0720
00630
00945
00940
00615
71870
00951
00745
32730
00680
MDOA855
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: WFP
• ••REMARKS"*
DATA VERIFIED BY: GKB
••'FOOTNOTES*••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED "NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
I!
(I
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
11 West Jackson Boulevard; 12th Floor
o, U. 6.0604-3590
------- |