-------
PROJECT. Casper Texaco Monitoring
Well Drilling LOGGED BvHtnrY R. Richtir
•••
•
x§
• -^
** * w ^
It -4 .- 0 <" .-
9."A. M b '« °.
n r r r i
tfl n
c ^
•> o
-* c
O 9
n o.
V
/
jf
~KH
•Ci'H
•:/ '•'.v/.v '•: :/".'£ ;••->!.'•;>: if.-uztefa v/ "~/ i 'J :\J ' •> JBBBBBEHBBR^^^ ,
:jlllll)ili|llll|([||Ji ^T". .; V V '
:;vVi:^'v^::*>7ri-Vi'.i!J^V.v;i>^/«-f'/ i i HDIfflRBBBIBR^^ i
.i i \ T )
O N '£* ~s? •*
°E " I "'I '
w ° ° oi " ,^;
i - = - *" ^^^
•Q o c *< ^<
S 9 5 2 1
3 3 —
MO. 0 —
» " i
J ,
3
N *
• ^
0 «
< ?
0 0
o o-
• o
3" »
A
m
0 '
c
D
•\
1 tt .
* , 2
•
O
m
^*
•H
I
r
H
3>
>
O
PI
u
o
'i
H
0
Z
z •
0
0
o
r
m
z
M
S 3 i
"h «J O
m > c
i r z
Otj
CD
r m m
|35
E
<0
"
.&
CO
-n CD a
E H 5
3 «
I
o
o
10
3
c
o
*
«
*
Ol
^
-£k
r
j)
Q
;K
o
I*
VJ
1
-vl
CD
1
O
cr
O
2
-
m
33
?.
3
Q
E
o
o
a
Q
o
^
»
• .
1
^
o
cr
*
', '
0-10 '
Sr^ !
T> ni ni
-c
r~
O
W -
&•••
-H "
•^
m
VI
r^
'
O
•n •
2!
^
I'
'
r~
o
o
03
o
m
o
f™~
m
CD
O
m
oc
o
t~
TJ m
o
m
ro 2
i
0 M
•n ^>
*
ro
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE.
M-25
PAGE
1
-OF.
- LOC. ex COO
GROUND EL
TOTAL DEf
BOREHOLE
Rfvs/34_-78-3-Jcb : • nRtitrpR Norfh«rn Testing..
Laboratories
FV ~5I24 Billings, Montana
n-H 36' RIG Hollow Sttm Auger
HtAU 9" BITte)
PI nin
DEPTH
0-1.5
1.5-3.0
3.0-4.1
.4. 1 -.4. 5
4.5-5.0
5.0-6.0
6.0-6.6
6.6-7.5
7.5 -8. 6
8.0-9.5
9.5-11.0
II.O-I2.5
12.5-13.6
13.0-15.5
15.5 -17.0
17.0-19.0
19.0-21.0
21.0-23.0
23.0-26.0
26.0-270
27.0-28.0
28.0-29.0
29.0-30.0
3O.O-3I.O
31.0-33.0
33.0-34.0
34.0-36.0
MATERIAL
_sm
l>"and a Silt
Sand a Silt
Cloy
Cloy
Sand a Silt
Cloy
Sand
No Sample
Sand
Sand
Sand •
No Sample
Sand 3 Silt
Sand a Clay
Sand a Clay
Sand 8 Clay
Sand a Cloy
Cloy
Cloy
Cloy
Clay
Clay
Shale
Shale
Shale
Shale
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
: START EINISH. .
niTP 7-7-82 7-7-82
TIUP. 0800 1030
GEOPHYS LOG
YPS X NO
Loamy dirt, 'some fine sand, light brown.
Fine to medium s'and and silt ,increase silt with depth, light brown.
Medium sand and silt , moderate sorting, brown.-
Gray clay , hard.
Gray clay, hard.
.Fine to very fine sand, slightly silty, brown to dark brown.
'Gray clay, slightly sandy , hard, greasy.
Fine to very fine sand, well sorted, round, clean quartz , tan
Add auger,' no sample.
Coarse sand and fine pebbles, moist , slightly silty, orange iron stains,
off -white.
Coarse to medium sand, abundant fine pebbles and gravels to 3 dia.
moist , no orange stains, no odor, clean quartz sand tt.grayto off-white.
Coarse sand , minor silt, fine pebbles to 1/8" diameter , wet at 1 1 feet,
no odor, gray to brown.
Add auger, no sample.
Medium sand and crave!, gravel to 3Hdiameter,no silt but minor 1/2"
thick clay lenses from 14 to 15 feet, wet, no odor, light gray to off-white.
Alternating medium sand and clay, sand is moderate sorted, round,
clean, no sjjt, off- white to tan, clay is olive drab.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Sandy clay / siltstone olive drab, wet, no odor.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Weathered blue-gray shale .
Carbonaceous shale , fine sand laminae, hard , greasy to dry.
Same as above.
Same as above. ^, 41/2" O.O. Carbon Stt«l Guard Pfpt
T r~i-^2" ID PVC Gating
Ground ^*. 1 7* •*• rX*
Surfao ^v» '| , .
^^ I.O1— "*" C«m«nt
-*" Bvntonit •
1/2" Volclar P«ll««i
4.0'-
— Cl«an Drill Cutting*
7.0—
— 12-20,8-16 Silica Sand
: - .020" Slot PVC Scr««n
30.5— £#£
.0.0
a
O
c
o
o;
H
O
cc
a.
A-60
-------
BQREHQ1 F • M~26
LOG OF BOREHOLE
c
E
k.
•
0.
o
0
£
w
e
c
cr
OODX9J
2t
»-
•&—
-L_
O
be
of
>•
k_
c.
«
T"
V
HO
8°
_i
o
c
o
—
c.
o
o
o
n
K
C
l_
«
n
••
0
C3
0
f
—
Q
^
*
0
LJ
3
a:
&
LOO
und -»- 1 — _
-~ 4 1/2" O.D. Carbon St««l Guard Plpt
A
Surfae. ^X 3.1* .'.. IT
^
J I.O 1
i A
2.0 ~~~ • if
1 1
m
i
4.0'— W
^,
3.0' i:
•"'"f
'.'t+:
£•£
6.5' — :"»:::=
.>.. —
?:': =
*\< —
-•'( E
12.3' — '--'^
•:•.•;'..• i
is.o* — IM^
^m
•>
\
\
I
F
7
"(•
*r~
*-
\
^ Z ID PVC Gating
* Cvmtnt
~ B«nlonll«
w
1/2" Volelay Ptll«li
— Cl«an Drill
Cuttlngt
— 12-20 Sllleo Sand
-- .020" Slot
— - B«ntonlt«
PVC Scrttn
- 1/2" Voleloy P.ll.ti
A-61
-------
PROJFP.T, Casper Texoco Monitoring
Well Drilling
Texaco Refinery. Cotper. Wyoming
LOGO ED RY Henry R. Richter
en
c
I
"c
1
<
4 u rl
' N AN m N
>. ». o> iff b b
i i" r \ r
«'i* •'.•"''•'•V-^'V^ • |t,'y. 'r*.Vi'» •i*'j'''''"'T'^t^xT ' y?I>.'<^TiBBHMHI^'s^sSvs
\ "•? J .V 't"«''.^«V|"i" "* •** * ^'^*- •** *-f"/^ ^i ""^^HlH^fifiV^^/^^v"
•'.— '•'J|llll|[Klinil|III]l
>' v/. :7.;.': v";.'y>; '.•.%:' !l''-:ai vxwb-v'* L^yi^cJr^ByBBUjj'^^
/ 1 I II
'o ' " " i5 ° N.™ ° """ —
8 ' i N,! S
* N a «r ° 3 ^&
1/1 M o - ~ " J%
2 = = 5-" ^
•o n ""
0 M -J i
U* 3 T i
» 0
* "
•
3
•'iwi^tro-ro-X^ic^jro ! o?J1P>"T5r":~' °
, COJ CO ' CO 'CO [ CO j CO JMj'COiCOJCOJCOJM. C01 CO.'O-O)
•.! o • o • o • o ; o ] o i o i o ; o ; o : o i D ' o j o :3 ' °-
•j • j ; 1 ! ' I s -
i : •! •! i ' ; i ; : ' v>
'• ' i • ' i : i i ' co
J I ' . **
i ' . : ;
' • ; ; ; : — i — i i :
' • • . i i i • ' ! •.*•$••. ;
JCO'. CO'M CO ! CO; CO j CO 'CO I COJCO !COiCO-jCO;i? a " .
0 ° _ -O
i- sr S'<
O 3 -1 '» '
w '. '•"* '
S oi 1°
M ^ '^^
O i '•'•la
o ~~ if.
2. .' o jw'
="• i3"
^ . •* t •
• fy 43
*< 1 » '
•• 1 ®
1 3 '
' "
'"
i • ; ; i
o
m
•»
H
X
E
n
^
r
0
n
a
n
91
H
0
X
^
X
o
n
o
E
E
m
"2
i
i
i
1
•n
c .
o
1
1
"
9
Tl
r
D
^
D
>
C
U)
•
B
3
•^
-C
m
CO
X
z
o
H
O
?
D
m
•n
^
I
OJ
W-
2
n
I
o^
o"
CV)
^
c
o
•
"*
^1 •
3 ;
TO 1
3C
-<
r
o
n
33
|
O
m
—
5
j
cn
a>
03
—
3
£
0
3
O
3
— 1
C -
i r
OJ
oi
__
CT)
O
o
r
Q
cr
O
O
•^
O
^
•1
7
>
n
|
r\)
o
i
m
ro
O)
1
"O
o
at
ro
r-"
._
2
T
5
|
C
&
1
^•^
CO
1
OJ
o
a
3D
r*
hn
Z
Q
A
"^
J3
,
H
*•
—•
&
't
CO'
HI
3)
H.
•rj
Z
3
^c.'.
CD
o
31
m
x
O
r
m
CD
O
2>
m
x
o
r
m
I
-vl
-------
PROJFCT Caspar Taxoco Monitoring
Drilling
\ nraTlON TaxQCo Refinery, Cotper, Wyoming
LOGGED RY Honrv R. Richtcr
CT>
CO
c — ^ ° ° ° "*
~» co S. 5 "^ (>" —•
-*, D (D "O Q W
s 3 * ° i 3 £.
tlf *^!
^ f* c" — • o pT
< ^iO^"3 !i O" — •
W "" D CL O — 3 "**
•* cr O- -*• CL . TO
— "> o* S r* — °
— 3 Ore o- cr -* w
a — cr _ . <* ^ w
• 3 3 "^ ^ O ^"
IV CL 5: rt o W «"
n> § f» 3- 3 a.
A O* ^ "U " r~I
° P- o "» »" ? =
°- _ cr .j ~ g o
~ ° S. e o 3' -•
|' ^ 0 5 o ^ £
l^-S-o ° °g
' ° « 0 •*"*' —
Siat«»^
^» a" o Q 2. w **
o o. -*• .j _ o
2. 2" 2 ^ — w" ™
| Q *•*> *^
*j OJ fO O" —* ^
a -*» 0° ° "'"•a <*
n> • ^ /» n
D Ht — 4 O ^" o 1?
^ fp (p •— n
*. a. " CL -
P" 0
S w o .^ « ^ 5 N P .N r° •- p o
• • • m Q ^ Q ^ o en o oi i
i??1 i i « * i ''l'0
OT S N 0 N W P 9 Jl •°'r> b b ^
b b In b "> b °> b ° ^
OOO OO O C/> to (/> O C/> (/)(/>(/>
000 00 0 § § §0§§° —
CD QB gj Qi
C) . t/> to
< — -> •*
n
o olrtW(^«WWW-owW-n
O "**^QQ"TOQ(ftOttt' — O'O rt Q "~ * — ' •••
2 ro=)33033**=jjJ'a.»^^
S ^^ « 5- 55- a> ~^$ « E' « « ££'£ u w ^ -
H lij" w ^o" g-J" w €^0* £- -g G-J o 3 Q- » <
*. q "A ^ ^^
-^ O *^ (•! CL — • O l/» O *^ fx O^ ••
CL^" ^"2e* W-^^tO^iO *^.—
IT ^ "* 3 3 y-^ o -*»"»-• 3 3 S!. ° £'
y cT*_^ o. * rrns^™^"*** ^*3"
~" Q — t/t ^ L* *^ fp 3 "*• ^ifl — ? •"••
W ^^ J1 § 03§T»"^»Q0 ^ 0"
O 3_ i **• — O— if* w<*—. T O
•— 3, <* — .""^3C7* ""' (» "* <
** *<§""*** D.DCT-* oj~ 5
I S--1 | | | j.?- I "s 3
° -™~og. ||^^-I'
I ^Ii^ »2^l^:
«. o° w'2. ^"",o*
z
o
o
o
E
C
PI
Z
H
u
I
(
•n
i
3
J>
5
n
•n
n
I
0
P-"
3
>
C
u>
u
H
W
NM«
^
m
X
2
O
-1
3
•H
-
D
T|
H
x
M
-
2
n
X
o
o"
C/5
a
3
^^
c
a
A
-»
ID .
D 3
TJ f
I
M
p
0
j)
n
^
2
o
m
r»
3
z
^
03
—
™~"
*•
r
o
-f
Q
3
O
H C
E*
TI p
o
o
oi
I
Laborat
o
~*
•'
M
3
to
•i
l
^l
jt
D
SJ
-^
1
.J
»
M
P
^
*
5
3
^
.
%
1
ro
J
OJ
0.
i
O
2
r
r
m
3)
•Norther
3
H
a
y«
5'
o,
,
t» •
33 '
-H
t
i •
-ij
2;
!rt
I
r~
o
CD
o
CD
O
3D
m
X
o
r
m
CD
O
3)
m
x
O
r-
m
m
I
ro
OD
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
0
e
PROJECT Casper Texaco Monitoring i rv-ATinw Texaco Refinery, Caiper, Wyom
t-
«
.c
o
ir
cr
>
t_
c
o
Z
>•
,0
•O
U
:0
o
0
_1
0
c
k.
O
o
5
LOC.or.COO<
GROUND EL
TOTAL DEP
BOREHOLE
*« 34-78-3ldb
PV «- 51 35
TH 27.5'
niAU 9
DEPTH
0-0.5
0.5-1.5
1.5-2.5
2.5-5.0
5.0-7.5
7.5-10.6
10.0-12.5
12.5-15.0
I5;0'-I7;5
17.5-20.0
20.0-22.5
22.5-25.0
25.0-26.0
26.0-27.5
MATERIAL
.Sjlt
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Clay
Sha'le
RORFHOt F M C»
PA<;F ^ OF ^
nnni PR Northern T«,«ting ••" -?TA"T _ -PIMISM
Laboratories 7.13_82 7.I3.82
Billings, Montana TIME1400 I60°
mr. Hollow Sttm Aug«r GFOPHYS LOG
nrrtsl — - _YESJLNO
Pimn
DESCRIPTION AND COUMEKT3
Silt, dirt, and root zone, light brown.
Very fine sand and silt, light brown.
Fine sand and silt, light brown.
Fin$.to"coarse sand, silty,, to slightly silty, poorly sorted^ subround,
mtnor fine pebbles to 1/8 diameter , some gravel to 1/2 diameter,
buff to tan.
: Same as above.
._ •*;.
••"Same as above.
Medium to coarse sand, clean, no silt, moderate sorting ,subround,
buff to tan.
Medium to coarse sand, clean.no silt, moderate sorting, subround,
moist at 15 feet, no odor, brown. .
Same as above, wet at 17 feet.
Medium to fine sand.sllty to slightly silty .increase silt with depth,
poorly sorted , wet , gray to brown.
Very silty sand and clay, brown to olive.
Sllty , clayey, medium sand, sticky, wet, no odor , olive drab.
Clay to weathered shale, greasy, carbonaceous flakes,slight odor (?)
Greasy blue-gray carbonaceous shale.
^* 4 1/2" P.P. Carbon St»«l Guard Plp«
., -2" ID PVC Gating
Ground -^^ fi^
Surfao ^""^^
^^
~^^n
V
z.o'- k
• •of- 1
p
I
1C
/•-
.1
16.0- »"
ft]
•*.
C-
l*'f
:X
%*r
w
%
'•*.
•,-:••
,\ '^
' '4 — C4m.nt
HK-" 8«ntonll«
P3__-I2-20 Silica Sand
**t'
'%':
^_ ta •
*~~- ^"
=:•>
:•
— - •;
' ^*
— .•,.
= ;.-,
i I. . ,;
= i»
— <
26-°- gc^
-- -• ?'r:>^
j
im
i— .02O" Slot PVC Scrtin
•)
\
I
S
,
A-64
-------
' BORFHOt F M 30
LOG OF BOREHOLE
Of
c
e
o
J
a.
o
O
J?
c.
or
o
o
o
K
H
^_
£
O
or
cr
>
c
Z
V
2°
oS
-10
o
c
h.
0
•*-
c
o
2
o
o
a
X
H
i_
€>
d
O
o
c
-"=
O
o
K-
O
->
O
a:
a.
L^ ~ rrv^s - 34,-78 - 31 CC -
«j cr\QQ
. GRO"NP FI FV OVJ^»
jn-rii OFPTH 16
0TIRF HOI F nlAM 9
DEPTH
i
'n — i G,
U 1 . 0
1.5 -3.0
3.0-4.5
•l • - ------
4.5-6.0
6.0-8.0
8.0-10.0
ip.p-j2,b
12.0-13.0
13.0-15.0
j 5.0 -16.0
MATERIAL
Sand a Silt
Sand a Pebbles
Sand
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Sand
Clay
Shale
•nftin FR Northern Te*t.ing -
Laboratories
Billing*, Montana
RIG Hollow Stem Auger
BIT(S)
FI inn
PAfiF 1 OF 1
• START ' FINISH" •'•
nATF 6-20-82 6-20-82
T|UF 0800 0945
GEOPHYS LOG
YFS X NO
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
Sand, silt, and dirt, fine pebbles to 1/4 diameter, root zone to 0.5 ,
dark brown.
Fine to medium sand and pebbles, pebbles to 1/4 'diameter .-moderate
sorting, .orange stains, silty at 2 feet, moist at 3 feet , no odor.
Medium to coarse sand, silty , poorly sorted, wet , very strong
• I'.chem pond "odor, bluish sheen to grains, black to blue-gray.
.Fine to coarse sand and gravel, gravel to 3"diameter, poorly
"Sorted, silty , blue -green sheen to grains, strong odor, black to
blue - gray.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same-as above. •
Medium to fine sand, poorly sorted, round
moderate odor, light gray.
Clay, moderately hard, greasy
slightly silty to silty,
, no odor, olive to greenish -gray.
Shale , carbonaceous , hard, tight, dry , no odor.
. — 41/2" 0.0. Coiban St«t! oua.-d Pip«
~|" _^-2" 10 PVC Catlnfl
Ground— ^^ 3-1* ~|~ [X^
Surfoc. ^X. 1 2.0'
w r, y
V / /
m v
z.o* — yJ L
B I
n i
A <
A— Ctmtnl
A
•
•
^
,
MB KB — B«nlonlt«
BB R9 1/2" Volclay P.ll.t.
BO B
3 1
Em i
at
1
9
4.0' IW fffl
^3 T£\ — Cl.on Drill Culling*
V /
V /
6.0'— ^ ^
;£• ^
r.s'— ji = ^
frjj; == '"
*••**, ^ 5
"w^ ~~ '
r« •. — $
Si = -
' ? = ;i
I3.S' -?K*/-
14.0' — im^l^
HHSB
16.0' *""••
V
•*
JJ— 12-20 Silica Sand
•,,
'.*
•^
" V
•J — .020" Slot PVC Scr«tn
*
•i
• — a«ntonlt«
• 1/2" Volclay Ptll«lt
A-65
-------
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number M-31s Permit No.
Well Location
County NATRQNA - - .. State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5140 Total Depth 33.5' Depth of First Water 25.1'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 33.5 ft. Material PVC
it
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .020" set from 27.1 ft. to 33.1 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes No
Type of pack
Packers BENTONITE
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS (2 buckets)
Depths of Bases 1.0' 4.0'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 33.5
" to depth of
A-66
-------
BOREHOLE M- 31 S
LOG Or- BOHLHOLE • PAGP 1 «P 1
pROjFftT Coaper Texoco Monitoring i or/mmt Texaco Refinery, Caspar, Wvnminn
o
c
*—
c
o
o
c
o
2
r 5*
,00
•O
UJ
0
0
c
o
c
o
LOG. or C
GROUND
TOTAL 1
' BOREHC
nnRns ..-----: -V- :-. " / nmn ?R Northern Testing ... . START- FINISH
Laboratories DATF 6-29-82 6-29-82
nFV-5l40 Billings, Montana TIMF2:ooPm 4=00 Pm
^PPTH 33.5 RIG Hollow Stem Auger GFOPHYS LOG
HPniAU 9" BITfSl . YES_X_NO
Fitnn
DEPTH
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
SEE LOG OF BOREHOLE FOR WELL M-.3I m
.^—41/2 0.0. Carbon Stttl
p Guard Plp«
^^-— 2" 10 PVC Cailng
HHfl| B8SH C«m«nt
^^9 ^BB ^Bffltonll*
^"^~~ ^/^! r//l 1/2" Volcloy Ptll«t»
"\\ ^'/
/« / t~Z>* CUan Drill Cultlnflf
\* / *^'
„ j i
^/ = x>
*i^\ — >~f/
/(N*-^ — — — ^-JA .020" Slot PVC Catinfl
33.1'— 'l\} \ ^/S|
v^ I "^
A-67
-------
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number M-31m Permit No.
Well Location
County
NATRONA
••State- WYOMING ••••
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Water Chem.
Drilling Time Log _
Other (Give type) HELL HISTORY
Pump Test
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5139.5 Total Depth 59.0' Depth of First Water 24.0'
Depth of Artesian Zone _ Final Water Depth _
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( _ )
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from
ft. to 57.9' ft. Material
PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation
inches by
inches
_
Number of perforations and depths
_ perforations from _ ft. to
ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No _
Diameter: 2" ID Slot size .020" set from 41.8 ft. to
47.8 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes
Type of pack
No
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
rubber shale
1.4'
BENTONITE
; other (desc.) PELLETS (2 buckets)
4.Qr~~
Cement surface seal :
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/ SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: Dropped _ X
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 58.0
to depth of _ 59.0
Pumped
U
A-68
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE M~ 31
PAGE
OF.
LOC.w C
GROUND
TOTAL I
BOREHO
nnnn*; . „ ' PRIM FR Northern .Testing - - 'START • FINISH
Laboratofiei DATF6-30-82 6-30-82
P1PV~5I39.5 Billings, Montana TIME fi:00am 11:30 am
IFPTH 59.0 RIG Hollow Stem Augor GEOPHYS LOG
tPn.AM -9 "to 58.0' Bms) . YES X N0
1.5" to 59. 0' niiin
DEPTH
0-0.5
0.5-7.~0
7.0-10.6
10.0 -2ZC
220>2aO
2aO-29.0
29.0-34.C
34.0-376
375-4aC
48.0-5aC
*
•' MATERIAL
Topsail ...
Silty Sand' .
Silty Sand -w/
Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Silty Sand
Sandy Silt
Silty Sand
Sandy Silt
Sand w/sholey
Lenses
Interbedded
Shale and
Sandstone
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
JBrpwa silty topsail. .....
J3f6wn, fine grained silty sand to medium sand.
Coarse grained- sand , brown •with silt and scattered gravel.
Glean finis .to coarse grained sand and. gravel.
Brown silty sand with small pods of clay.
Brown sandy silt with clay pods.
... - . _ _ . __ . ^ ^
Brown silty sand with small pods of clay.
Brown sandy silt , very sticky.
Very distinct lenses of shale 1 to 2 inches thick interbedded with
lenses of rusty fine to coarse sand.
Interbedded gray shale and fine to coarse grained gray' sandstone
-41/2" 0.0. Carbon Slttl
^ Guard Plp»
Ground.^ ' , ^^- • Z" ID PVC Casing
Surface >^ 2..O JT-. p~~^^
^F |-4'- m •• Tc'm"t ^^
BB ESl Btntonltt •'
4>0< BB H9 I/Z" Veleloy Pill«ti
$ $ '
/-I A.V
\* *f\.
i-/ /fVi— Cl«cn Drill Cutting*
- K ^< -
§ -?:
r< ^
4..8' ^. >±,
\/ ' S.N.
V-l /X-— J020" Slot PVC Ca«lna
-\ i =•"" '-
PXNHvv
47. a'- 'A ^>
^ i;-/ •
\ I v7^
IN /,<
IT 0' ~? -r • f*"S
590'— /UW- : Split' Spoo* Sdmpl«r Boring
o
o
z>r
2
H-O
00
Oo
-JO
o
C
C
o
o
o.
o
Ul
o
a:
a.
A-69
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BQRFHQLE- M~32
PAGE
1
-OF.
a
O
. 54-78.-r.3lcc
GROUND ELEV-
TOTAL DEPTH.
5095
BOREHOLE DIAM..
DRILLER Northtrn Toting
Laborator i««
Billinqt, Montana
RIG Hollow St«m Aug«r
B IT(S)
Fimn ——
TART' ' F1NI
7-15-82 7-15-82
TIME 080°
GEOPHYS LOG
1000 -
YESiX_NO
DEPTH
MATERIAL
DE1CHIPTION AND COUUCNTS
2"
HO
§i
O
3
tc
a.
0-0.5
0.5-1.5.
1.5 -2.5
2.5-5.0
i •
5.0-7.5
7.5-10.0
0.0-11.5"
1.5-14.0
Silt
Sand 8 S_ilt
Sand 8 Silt
Sand a Silt
Sand
Sand
Clay
Shale
Silt and dirt, vegetation root zone, dark brown.
Fine sand and silt, brown.
Medium sand and silt,moderate sorting, subround, wet, strong
"chem-jfond" odor, gray to light blue-gray.
Medium sand and silt, well sorted, subround to round, strong odar,
ofay, water at 3.5 feet.
Medium to fine sand,well ^p moderate sorting, round to subround,
•'minor fine pebbles to 1/4 diameter,less odor than above, but
still a distinct odor, gray to dark gray.
Medium sand,well sorted, round,clean, no silt,strong odor again,
gray to dark gray, slightly less odor at 10 feet.
Sandy clay, weathered,soft and plastic, TIO odor. .
Shale,carbonaceous and sandy, hard, dry, minor fine white sand
laminae, gray to dark blue-gray.
4 \/Z* 00. Carbon St..I Guard Pip.
Z" 10 PVC Gating
C*m
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE.
M-33
PAGE
1
-OF.
1
a
O
i nr », moftns 34 -r-78 --31 CC
GROUND ELEY-
TOTAL DEPTH.
BOREHOLE DIAVL
5O99
23'
nmii FR Northern listing
Laboratorl«s
Billings, Montana
RIG Hollow St«m Auqtr
BiT(sl
- START
nATF7-IS-82
TIUP 1015
GEOPHYS LOG'
- FINISH
7-15-62
1200
Y.FS X NO
DEPTH
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
"
S
o
X
«
H
O
o
o
ui
3
K
a.
0-2.5
•r
2.5-5.0
5.0-7.5
.1 . ..
7.5-10.0
10.0-12.5
12.5-15.0
15.0-17.5
J7.'5-2ab
20.0-21.0
2T.O-23.0
Silt 8 Sand
Sand
Sand 8 Silt
Sand 8 Silt
Clay
Sand
Clay
Shale.
Shale
Shale
?Ht_,clay, and fine sand , brown.
Medium to fine sand, some minor pebbles and gravels, pebbles to
1/4" diameter, gravels to 3 "diameter, silty and clayey, clay at
4 feet nbrown.
Fr'ne sand and silt, well sorted, round ,no pebbles , or gravel, brown
to greenish-brown.
kino sand and silt ,well sorted, round to subround. slightly siltler
•than above, brown to greenish-brown,slightly darker than jjbove.
Sandy clay, weathered shale (7) similar to poorly consolidated
siltstone, moist, no odor.llghl green .to brownish-green. .. -
Clayey to very silty sand, differs from above because more sand,
moist,no odor,brawn.
Sandy clay, poorly consolidated siltstone (?) wet,no odor, plastic,
very sticky, olive green.
Weathered shale,wet, no odor, blue-gray to gray.
Same as above.
w • - • *
Shale, carbonaceous,sandy , hard,dry, blue gray to dark gray.
4 t/Z" 0.0. "Carbon S l««l Guard Plp«
Z" 10 PVC Gating
C«m«nt
Btntonlt*
1/2" Volclay Ptll.t.
— J.T;'::; —«<3;— 8-16 Silica Sand
.018' Slot PVC Ser««n
zz.d —
Z3.0 —
A-71
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BORFHOl F M-34
PAGE
1
-OF.
.LOCwCOO
GROUND EL
TOTAL DEF
BOREHOLE
fin* 34-78-3ldb
Fv-5140
>TH 39.5'
n.Au 9"
DEPTH
JD-2.5
2.5-5.0
J5.0-7.5
:j7.5-IO.O
j
10.0-12.5
12,5-15.0
15.0-17.5
i 7. 5 -20.0
.i.
20.0-2£5
22.5:25.0
25.0-27.5
27.5-30.0
30.0-325
32.5-35.0
35.0-37.5
37.5-39.5
MATERIAL
Silt a Sand
i-
Sand a Silt
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
San^
Sand
Clay
Clay
Sand
Clay
Clay
DRILLER Northern Testing
Laboratories
Billingt, Montana
RIO Hollow Stem Auger
ams) —
FIUIO
DESCRIPTION
Silt and fine sand, well
brown to tan.
-
AND COMMENTS.
sorted, vegetation
Fjpe sand and silt , moderate to well sorted
2 diameter gravel found, light brown.
START FINISH
riATF 7-15-82 7-15-82
TIUF 1530 1600
GEOPHYS LOG
YES X NO
•
root zone to 84.', light
, no pebbles although one
Medium' to fine sand, minor silt and clay, minor fine pebbles to 1/4"
dfameter-,moderate. sorting , subround , light brown to tan.
-Medium sand, clean, no silt , subround, well sorted, light brown to tan.
.Medium sand, grades downward to coarse.
minor fine pebbles and
gravel, gravel to 3 diameter, clean , no silt, moderate to poorly
sorted, subround, brown.
Same as above.
Medium sand, clean, no
no odor, light brown.
silt , well sorted, subround, moist at 17 feet,
Medium to fine sand, clean, no silt, well sorted, round, moist to wet,
no odor, light, brown to tan.
Same as above.
Same as above.
• Medium sand. well sorted, clean, no silt, wet, no odor, minor silt
from 26 to 26.5 , brownish-green.
Sandy clay, soupy wei , plastic, no odor, olive green.
Sandy clay, soupy wet,
olive green, no odor.
Clayey sand, good volume of water, no odor
, olive green to brown.
Sandy clay, soupy wet, olive green, no odor.
Sandy clay, soupy wet-,
olive green, no odor.
., Z" 10 PVC Gating
Ground— ^^ rC
Surfact ^-
/^^ ' /
3.0'- \
_
'*t \ i ^
i fa-.'-
1 & .c-"
'{ ji Cl.on Drill
Cuttlngi
ISJ W
e.o- I
i
J r'l
1 H- — Btntonlt*
9 H l/2" Vo|ctoy P«n«ti
H H
IS.O'— 1
m m
m (a
1
t
29.3'- \
••
'*
;!
i
1 fl B* ... '"
N hid
•; ^- — 12-20 Silica Sand
•' £?
* °™ -.'
• ~—
:EJ-— .018" Slot
£z=
'• =
' —
PVC Sert«n
o
O
HO
Oo
-JO
D
C
o
O
cc
a.
A-72
-------
BOREHOLE M~35
LOG OF BOREHOLE
pj
\j^
e
>
h_
o
a
«a
O
O
>-
^
€>
C
»-
«
CC
O
0
a
X
0
r-
*-
«
^—
x:
o
fV-
^.
SI
>•
t_
C
O
x;
2>r
2
r-O
Oo
05
-10
_l
o
c
t_
o
c
o
o
o
a
X
o
r-
t_
o
o
o
O
0
c
C)
o
£
r-
O
OJ
-J
O
tc
a.
i or. >_
4.0-_ H m~c
ir^
BBB HH~~ Btntonit*
Kga KM I/Z" Volclay P.ll.ti
. KM ^Bi
8-°- rfn Kfl
N-jJ-j JT^M Cltan Drill Callings
*\~ \ HV
,/V' i!A
W -W/
'S"° S -'ri'
•::'•«•• 'y^ ~~~ 8
''S'-i' '."•'-
!/.:.-.;. t."-J>
18.8'— S£;=VJ#
l*f^^* ~~~ **~i*«
*"*"^* ~~ *••*• *•
;^-*"l ~"~ **!"•»
-?v?"- = j!?5
:;i*/« ^ '^iii -"" .0
:^ . — *!?.•!
."ipi": ~~ :.:^";
£§?:; = Xf-fl
28.6'— ^Tii/S^jv:
-16. 12-20 Silico Sand
18" Slot PVC Scr..n
A-73
-------
Job: 184
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 3-29-84
Name of Individual Completing This Form Lisa Jarvis'
Well Name or Number H-36 Permit No. 66842
Well Location NW SW Sec. 31. T34N, R78W
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Chen and Associates
Name of Driller Dave Jarvi
Name of Owner of Well Texaco USA
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow stem auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. x Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5138.56'Total Depth 40' Depth of First Water _
Depth of Artesian Zone _ Final Water Depth 19'
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( _ '
and attach extra sheets)
4" I. P.. diam. from 0 _ ft. to 40 ft. Material Schedule 40
» »
PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory saw slots
Size of perforation 0.020 inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from 20 ft. to 40 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes x No _
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes No
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx)
No. Sacks _
Method of Placing: Propped Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6i " to depth of 40
" to depth of ~~'
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY
LOCATION CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
LOGGED BY
I
•^ N)
0 O
b q
n HI n ii n ii i inn i n ii n
III lull 1 11 II 1 II
,\\\\ ,VM^VV'.VV':VV'.r'%'V''K:
1 ill
-Is- O CD *• CD
•• 73 > : q}
.- r= Q - 2
P •" 3 P o
-o 2 ^ <" —
•C _J f~ O — 1
O _J m r" f"1
< § }2 2 < !j £
n I* 3 ^ 5 o *
So g o o
q CD 0 m to
to 2 o
z
o
Xi.
0 0
1 1
* -u
o .
o
r-
O
to >
?J -<
o to
§
o o
j, J,
X" 7T
1 £ £
en '* ^*
. o o
cr cr
Ci 0
x- x-
D n
»^ *ft
cT o"
0 0
o o
a, a.
-\ -\
** •*
^ ^i
0 22
o I' 5
C £X Q.
2 . »
° i o
l/l 2 a.
c 3
n ^
rr> O.
,_,
m
— t
I
z
— <
70
~
< —
tn
o
XJ
-»j
-4
O
Z
n
o
m
2
—1
to
-^
I —
C
—
o
1
1
J
"^
r^
(T
\»
r
•z
C
CD
0
0
l-
rn
O
2
cr>
^
CD
—
—4
**"*»
^
1
1
O
n
O
t)
t/5
r—
O
CT
— 1
O
— 1
£
O
m
~j
^
o
o
PO
—
n
o^
5"
tn
^
3
>•
c
r
_^
>m
t
,
,'
I
n
a
c:
2
O
>^
r—
rn
<
cn
w
CO
t/i
,_,
>
-4
m
M
V.
KJ
vT>
CD
A
W
^
NJ
vD
CD
— t
W
^*
2
X)
-J
CD
<
O
^7
-B
"
iC
O
3
LO
O
I
X
T
2
u
a
r-
0
O
0
o
o
o
X3
O
2
<
to
o
w
CJ
XD
i —
r—
rn
JO
3^
3
3
a.
w
Wl
o
o
5
T
^
•
3
•4
T
5
1s s
a
3
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 9-20-64
Name of-Individual Completing. This" Fonn Keith Thompson
Well Name or Number M-37 Permit No.
Well Location 34-78-31 deb
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. • Northern Testing
Name of Driller Bill Neff-Driller / Steve Cromwell-Helper
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Mobil B-50 Hollow-stem
Data Available (attach copies if available) auger
Sample Desc. x Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 31.5 Depth of First Water 5_
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth ^__~~~
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( ]
and attach extra sheets) _
4" I.D. diam. from 0 ft. to 30.8 ft. Material Schedule 40
~~~~
PVC 112(J
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory cut slots
Size of perforation 0.25 inches by 2.7 inches
Number of perforations and depths
4570 perforations from 5.4 ft. to 30.8 ft.
*
Was screen installed: Yes x No
Diameter: 4" I.D. Slot size .025" set from 5.4 ft. to 30.8 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes x -No
Type of pack 8/16 frac-sand; 1.5 ft
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1.2 gal/sack (Sakrete)
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Dropped x Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
10 to depth of 31.5
" to depth of '
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY
LOCATION CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
BY L. Jarvis- M. Crenshaw- K: Thompson
O O vO vO "^ 0"> 0"> *-"-*^(>JN)~"
cno^wb b c/ib cnbobb.
-LI'1' ' ' ' ' • i i ' _.
en en Q en w o o en b b b b b •
0 to co co co to co
cocoocon co 5 °° oooooo
> > <"" > <~ V > ft^r^.^ ]T
2 2 > 2 > z 9<>2 ?« S* 5X> P» 9° 9«
o o -< o -c o <„ ° SS^ci^o
Vj » x> x) ;o ^) ?o
o ££<<<<
f~ r~" r- r- i— r- "
0. -n COCO CO or n -0 < CO N> 31 v/> o < CO 2. < < CO CO CO CO /»* 2*
J. ? 03 3 ° jT 5. 3 ! § * 33- * 1 £ £ ~ 3 1 1 3 £ |'
JT - § * * 3* 3 §o~ — " § o- — 2. "* * * * — «n
*^ O ». A/ ^ \£1 "^ ill- ^ ^ 5T --• /rt A/ *^ — • &/ A/ &s A/ "^ *^ >h.
0/3 i°w ^ -,w ^5* i?*q ^i2 ^ «? ^U^ w w w w o-c
?-D*> H»vt^%c3^-^£i Irt** -J— i—
^ 3\0 *^0 — . ^? ^ /n^ 3 ** IA •*** ** ** *ki ^
' r\ -^ • n" ^ — ^* ^o ^ i <"i ^* —i ^ •n ~^ T * '— -, ^ o^ ^ ^** m
37" "O /j Q Q fy "^ ~^ ^J — • . | *• O •* ** CD O O O Jj O. -Q
5I s- - i? I| g|J si r s«^a» s M « ?f i
cr-A Vui 04 "~" -^ d.
2.^"£ q o^'toi*' " o<-» 3 o*
5^; 1 l^^s-^l t 5 1 -°- §• |- 1
= °? :^T4'^ 2 v^g.a o t ^
i^O^ «"^«J3'»V5:> ^ O <• a- Ji.
2^-J. „-. 0-0-3; ^ 2. 2 ^ *.
m *^ ^^ 1 A/ ® ^ D "^ **
^c ^*T^^*/i o «^* C
^ ^"^c^rt c t>
<•* J -* rt ,T ^- j ^*
-.0 ^°«^w M< =
^» e ^ODO^1 ' O *>
3-3 vQ>'£--|^o O1" °
t-i ^^'IC3 — 0 ?
"-• c "• vDo. 3 -» °'
* C^ y-
^
0
m
— 1
I
z
— »
m
^
r-
O
m
to
O
70
TJ
— i
O
2
>
O
O
o
z
~z
CO
•
-n
r J
c:
r
-<
f
u
h
2
C
CO
o
X)
rn
:r
o
r-
n
o
Z
O
CO
— t
c/>
o
2
p
•x.
:
I
CO
o
o
I
-<
CO
r~
O
O
i
)
C
»
)
-H
0
— <
r~
O
m
3
M
~*
en
•
/o
D
o
OT
E;
CO
I
en
o
—t
3
m
•^
^j
o
K)
en
n
;o
a
c
z
o
' 1
r—
m
CO
ST
<
•»
0
0
<
"b
i
X
t
-5*
•»
n
0
3*
~*H
m
vJ3
1
vO
i
O3
vO
I
K)
O
CO
c
T
1
c
-
J(
\\
I
7
i
+
U
5
f
A.
~
-T
•2
U
a
r-
o
o
b •
70
o
o
TO
o
0)
w
,
•J
00
1
a.
rt
o-
O
O
-n
C
o
T
5-
t
-\
•$
— <
*»
M
^•^
3
LO
r—
tu
1
^
.
3
1
1
5
•A
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY
LOCATION CASPER TEXACO REFINERY-
LOGGED BY I J OD w o ui b b CM b o b *-" °
""** * * ••••,• "
2 riD^ ^ «• ^ *"^ •" ^^ °^?
,?,£-'!£! g-i 1 i ^ IM & M Us-
w ^* Q OJ ^ *^ ~^ ' *^ i J^T ^ ^ — ^ ^ *^"
D ** 3 ^ ^ A/ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^~ •"* ^ ** */^ '5* **
1 1 r « 1 A? ! 1 ^ ^ | r|f
^§^' r 2.°rio5 s s- "2 s.
^^^ ? ^acAjr" Q- °.'-A«
<• ^- ** • vC «O ** ** AJ
>2 5. »- ^ -29-. ° — ~> M 3Z^$-3
~** ^" O *"j O *?* ^' i/t t> ^" — .^
rn^ °" o » S J» 2. ^ 3^°^
2 § ?^^b ^? -R|^S
•» TivCQ-- _j «A •• (rt
- Z w "M "* » • 5 ? 2. 3' —
-*2. 2-±3 ^- | o^^5-
^» ^* ^* ». ^" *rf"* ^^ ^ "^ ^ ^
3 ^\\A-? * — * D^^^
33 m ^ ^* ' ^" * "^ IA
o^» -3^- £. ^' ^.H^D
Q. " «^ o X w c — * 5 ^~
O 3W O 1 • S **
i a. o * -s a, v^> ^o _
OW"\ \/\ ~ "*O<
T ^^ "* ^ ^"-»*^
^ "O » ^ A/ fNj " -j
ej V - 2. b 3
° n *»
Q- a. ° D
0 * ~
"*
O
m
~0
— i
X
Z
^
m
J
r—
DESCRIPTION
2
O
O
m
2
•H
CD — i CD
O O X)
30 i> °
3! •" 2
O o O
rZ rn rn
m T3 Jj
O ^ rn
J>
a
JL •
-
O
tfl
1
••
'
<
1 —
o
o
b
o
o
o
X3
0
e/>
™n O3 SO
E H ^
O trt
1
q
o
b
b
i
(/i
-j
o
cr
CD
1-
en
0
-»
<
<»
Cromwell - H
-6*
?s
?^
-s
i
f p Northern 1
— ^
5
r—
cr
O -( O
rn — ->,
0 2 *
5 ^ rn t
*c
^
(0
i—
n
•s
0
^
£j
o
0 5
^ :
**}
/)
"H
>.
O
-t
CO
•^
f
rn
(/)
N
2
O
NJ
Ul
v/l -
. -
9 {-
TI
z
7)
r
CO
•^
r~
C
C
C
T
a
r
•^
X
n
3
C
r
r»
i
r
(
CD
O
X)
m
O
z
I
-------
O w <". c i l vj L i- .
LOG OF BOREHOLE
tt
UJ
2
UJ
ce
o
o
x
V)
O CD
\— ^
^C rtr
LOG OR COORDS
GROUND ELEY.
TOTAL DEPTH.
BOREHOLE
31.5'
I | FP Northern Testing Lab
Bill Neff - Driller
Steve Cromwell - Helper
RIH Mobil B - 50
D"O.D./6"I.D,-H S.A7 -
Fl HID None
START FINISH
HATF 9-19-84 9-20-84
TIME 1730 1925
CEOPHYS-LQG"
DEPTH
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
>
>-
a
UJ
Q.
O
Ct
CL
or
o
o
o
X
UJ
t—
cc
UJ
a
^
N
:.
f-
1
J
4
*\
4
4
X
t
•s
i
\
A
4«
\
X
J
N
— ^TFFL PRQirrTOR PIPT
•^ 1 U. C.^ rf^Wlt^lW^" r ir s.
— 4 1/2" O.D SCH 40 PVC
14 CEMENT SURFACE SEAL
« OR ILL CUTTINGS
« 8/16" FRAC SAND
4 1 /2" 0 D SCH 40 Pv
SLOTTED SCREEN
W r«
-------
Job:
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA
182
Date: 1-24-82
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number M-49A Permit No. 58583
Well Location 34-78-31cb
County Natrqna...
State- Wyoming^
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Water Chem.
Drilling Time Log __^__
Other (Give type) Well History
Pump Test
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev.
Depth of Artesian Zone
Total Depth 25 Depth of First Water _ 19_
Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
4i" O.D. diam. from 0 ft. to 19 ft. Material Sch
40 gv st
u M u u u u
u ii u » u n
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to . ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 4 3/4" 00 Slot size 0.020 set from 19 ft. to
inches
22 ft.
ii u u u ii u u u
Was well gravel packed: Yes No X
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
; rubber shale
; other (desc.)
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1 _
Method of Placing: Dropped
Bit or Reamer Size
Pumped
6 1/2
" to depth of
" to depth of
25
A-74
-------
M-49 A
LOG Oh BORLHOLb ™EJ_OF_L_
«>
c
o
c.
£
o
w
a
a
>
w
c
•
k.
c
«
T
>
Z CO
2a
1- UJ
< o
O 0
0 0
-1 -1
u
c
M
o
u
a
M
t-
k_
«
a
?
M
O
=t
JC
O
c
o
w
o
I
<0
*""
o*-
UJ 'O
-» c
0 0
L/v - rrvipn«? 34-78-3lcb
,. . - - • • -•
COOHHO Fl FV =5141
TrtTAl OFPTH 25
pnpFHOi F niAU 6(/2" to 25*
MPTM
0-2
2-6
6-8
8-10
10- 13
13- 18
18- 19
19-22
22-24
24-25
rettc.
RATC
CORC
vital
MUTT
MATTXIAJ.
Well Sorted,
Fin* Sand
Silt to V«ry
Fin* Sand
Poorly Sorted
Medium Sand
to Fin* Grav*l
Viry Coars*
Sand
Coars* Sand
Medium Sand
Coart* Sand
Medium Sand
Coars* Sand
V«ry Coart*
Sand
n»,,,F» Wattr W.ll S.rvic.. ,TABT „„„„
Craig , Colorado OATF 1-24-82 J-24-82
Buck Sawy«r ; N«il Bortn TIME 0800 1000
Rlfl Gardner - Oanvtr Rotary OFOPHYS ma YES X MQ
BiTfal
FLUID Air
mt-
•ou
Bacmrrioo AMD cotiMoirs
.4 1/2 "O.D. Schedule 40
Ground~^ / Galvanized Steel Casing
Surface X . F
"^S^ r? I'f ""^S^*
fy.'J. ij.'C Cement Surface Seal
'*/ \^f
io'— '$• $
•'^ '^- Drill Cuttings
V
20— )'~ =»=s JX, 3 Fl. Johnson Sernun
A-75
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1-26-82
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number M-50As Permit No. 58565
Well Location 34-78-31cd
County Natrona • . . - • • - State Wyoming •",.:;••
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log __^_^__ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 22 Depth of First Water
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth ~
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
4j" P.P. diam. from 0 ft. to 18 ft. -Material Sch 40 gv st
Perforations: Type of perforator use'd
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 4 3/4" OD Slot size 0.020 set from 18 ft. to 21 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 " to depth of 22 '
" to depth of '
A-76
-------
Tfxgco Inc,
LOCATION TMOCO R«fln«ry. Catptr . Wyoming
Land Farm Q High Strength Waste Water IOQSFO BY Henry R. Richtar
£z
i
N
10 o\ o °
1 1 1
1 * 1
r^ 5 w 5
in
^f
o
•
O "n 3C "^ w w TI
Is Is l= •
2 i __ o M
W (A -" 2
Oo 3 °-
3 3 •
U. £^
-<
Pi
wo r
zS °
n a.
A V W
Tr r T ' 1 «
• *fJ«"/tV.?/il V^/ V-' -^t^\
I /
• : .•|i;-/1f- « IT
a ~ a -* no
3 <» M 0 — Q.
1 0 _ C
tn — n ° —
n N ,. 2
•^ (/> "
<* "I A 3 ^
• 2 ° i o
3 0 ~
1
in
o
3
a
•
(AO>
>C
Z-n
tn
o
r
o
m
a
0
\
5
-4
\
{
A
^
? 1
B
>•
O
r
^
I
o
n
2
£
i
9
3
1
OHO
003
» -) 0
m > c
P o"
m P> R
m T> r
o -) m
C
en
)f
i
o
ro
ro_
ro
ro
„
m
ro
. r
o
o
8
3)
O
in
*
•
OJ
1
CD
w
O
Q.
•n CD a>
£ H S
a
w«
M
o
O
a.
•^
i
o
3
•r Rotary
CD
c
r>
x-
C/l
o
X
CD
0
o
2!
a
-
**
o
o"
-1
a
a.
:£
o
^
•
Service*
OHO
m = >
o «: H
3J
tr
g
_
0'
O
—
ro
H
3)
_^
i
CD
¥0
_< .J.
m
u
X
«
O4
O
1
ro
01
i
TJ
z
I
35 ~~
r
o
(D
O
CD
O
"n
^j
m
o
r~
m
00
o
3)
•i
3E
J
r~
?
0
n
,_
o
*t
z
i
Ol
o
>
u
-------
Job: , 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1-12-82
Name of Individual Completing This Form Henry R. Richter
Well Name or Number M-50Ad Permit No. 58584
Well Location 34-78-31cd
County Natrona ' State Wyotni ng
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log ___^__ Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 56 Depth of First Water
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
41" O.D. diam. from 0 ft. to 52 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
II
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 4 3/4" OD Slot size 0.020 set from 52 ft. to 55 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack 12-20 frac-sand
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Bent(Vol )pe1
Depths of Bases 52 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks _L
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/4 to depth of 56
" to depth of '
A-78
-------
BOREHOLE M"50Ad
LOG Oh BOHhHULh »n_±_<>f_.i__
o
c
E
o
>
a
a
O
>•
c
o
a
X
£
c
<
o
c
u
c
M
0
o
a
Ul
-»
O
oe
a.
Land Farm 8 Wan Strength Woit« Water LOGGED BY Henry R. Richtar :
LOC. Of COORD
GROUND ELEV
TOTAL DEPTH
BOREHOLE 01
«, 34-78-31 cd
56'
iu e'/V to 56*
WCPTH
0-10
10- 15
15- 19
19- 21
21- 36
36-40
40-52
52- 55
55- 56
KNC.
HATE
cone
f>
sa
AMUn
o(,r
MATCMIAl.
Fin* Sand
Silt to Fin*
Sand
Fin* to
Medium Sand
Fine to
Caane Sand
Shal*
Shal*
Shal*
Silly Sanditon*
Shal*
nmii PR Water Wei/ Service. CTftnT F|H|nH
Craig , Colorado hATC. 1-12-82 -1-12-82
Buck Sawyer •. Neil Boren Tiue 1245 1545
Rl
Bl
FL
eoL
a Gardner - Denver Rotary CFOPMYS LOQ YES X HO
TfSl
um Air and Water
DOCmrriO* AMD COMMCMTl
BUFF COLORED
SANOS
YELLOW SILTS
GRAY CLAYS
Ground ^
;
= 2'-
i
i
•
m
/4 1/2" 0.0. Scheduls 40
' Galvanized Steel Casing
%§&&
— Cement Surface Seal
Drill Cuttings
Bentonite
Gravel Pack, 12 -20 Frac-Sand
A-79
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1-10-82
Name of Individual Completing This Form Henry R. Richter
Well Name or Number M-51As Permit No. 58585
Well Location 34-78-31cc
County Natrona-' • ' ' State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 15 Depth of First Water 9
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
41-" P.P. diam. from 0 ft. to 10 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by incn"e?
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was sere
Diameter
n
Was well
M n
n n
en installed: Yes
: 4 3/4" OD Slot size
n n
gravel packed: Yes
X
0.020
X
" " "
M ,. „
No
set from 10 ft. to
ii ii ii n -
No
13
ft.
II II II II
~X No
Type of pack 12-20 frac-sand
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Bent(Vol)pel
Depths of Bases 5 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks _2
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/4 to depth of 15
" to depth of ~~~ '
A-80
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE —M - 5 I As
PAGE I OF I
• rtr ..rnnrnv* 34-78-31 CC
GROUNO PI FV =5124 -•-
TOTAL DFPTH 1 5
BOBFHOI F niAU 6/4 fO 15
OCPTM
0-3
3-5
5-8
8-10
10- II
II - 12
12- 14
14- 15
rcnc.
*ATC
com
«i
j»
AJRUTT
UATEftlAI.
Very Fin*
Sand and Silt
Very poorly
Sorted Very
Fine Sand to
Med. Gravel
Milting
Very poorly
Sorted Fine
Sand to Coarji
Gravel
Fin* Sand to
Medium Gravel
Fine Sand
and Silt
Very Fine
Sand and Silt
Silt to Very
Fine Sand
n»inr» Wattr W.ll Sarvic.. «T,RT FmnH
Craig . Colorado OATE 1-10-82 I-IO-82
Buck Sawy«r ; Neil Boren -TIME 1130 1230
pia Gardn«r - D«nv«r Rotary GFOPHYS LDQ YF-? X HO
BlTfSl
FLUIO Air
eot
oacwrrtoo AMO coMMtatr*
_
SEDIMENTS ARE YELLOW
AND BECOME DARKER
WITH DEPTH
. . -
/*> 1/2*0.0. Schedule 4O
/ Galvanized Steel Casing
Ground^^^ ^_^__^ t
<$KjMJi ^J~~^Cement Surface Seal
j^Q Kj Drill Cuttings
H H Bentonite
I 1
',' ^ Drill Cuttings
X '»•
'-•' '"^ Grovel Pock, 12-20 Frac-Sand
'-» f"'*
£ " Ti^r 3 Ft. Johnson Screen
c|
'I
o
i:
H UJ
< o
o o
o o
K-J
a.
A-81
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1-20-82
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number M-51Am Permit No. 58566
Well Location 34-78-31cb
County Natrana . . - State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log __i^__^ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 45 Depth of First Water 8
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
4j" P.P. diam. from 0 ft. to 40 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
Perforations: Type of perforator used • •-
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from • ft. to ft.
ii n n n n
it ~~ n n
Was screen installed: Yes X No __^___
Diameter: 4 3/4" OP Slot size 0.020 set from 40 ft. to 43 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Bent(Vol)pe1
Depths of Bases 37 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 to depth of 45
" to depth of
A-82
-------
LOG OF'BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE M~51 A m
PAGE ^ I OF'
LOC. or COORO
GROUND ELCV
TOTAL DEPTH
BOREHOLE Dl
«- 34-78 -31 cc
-5124
45'
AM
S'A" to 45*
0
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1-21-82;
1-22-82'
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number M-51Ad Permit No. -58567
Well Location 34-78-31cb ~~~
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type) .
Drilling Time Log __i^___ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 70 Depth of First Water
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth ~
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
4j" P.P. diam. from 0 ft. to 61 ft. Material Sch 40 qv st
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
u u
u u
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 4 3/4" OP Slot size 0.020 set from 61 ft. to 64 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Bent(Vol)pel
Depths of Bases 60 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 to depth of 70 '
" to depth of ~~~~ '
A-84
-------
PROJECT Texaco Inc.
inniTinw Texaco Refinery . Catoer . Wvomlno
Landfill a High Strength Waste Water LOGGED BY Henry R. Rlchter
i
oo
en
i i
0 £
1 1
2 £
i
s
w c*i 01 ro ro ro ro ro ro ~ —
a* t>j o to ~ 01 w — o ^
'iii' i i i -i i i
w i>i t>4 w ro ju ro rororo —
N en tn o *° -s tn oj — o A
•" Q 09 tn 04 O
I . 1 ' ' '
_ _ — oo tn W
N - 0
t/> t/t
3T O
O 3
— a.
" M
£f
•
<>
-zm
HOO
onim
HZ to
^ro
3J
p»°
*o ?
**
~*
I/) I/)
ar =r
o o
• •
-i
3_
'•'• *•/'''"
~v;.'-fȣ'
•'•''•' :%V
.Vt«tk¥j.
V»vV
'iv:'-^:
Ha
T
(/)
ar
o
*
O^
•>r i
il
r
/ 1
O* CD O
m _[_ o
r* w *
<
c
^
^ s
; 1
X)
3
1
«r
* £
0
r
n
a
1 Q.
i
•
CO l/> T| < TlO ^< ^21 WZ! ** Tit/) (^ (/) <
2. 5L • ** *^* 5** "** a.* ** •** -»3C
""«/>? c/>? w2 £ o 3! ws -£2
""(A3^*** °" O*Q.* S. *
1 q 1 1 S I " i
o_ o_ q. p_ p_ ^
JMBBJBM -,••-/ N .•*%,' — / -^- \^""^ *** s ' ^^^f~ ^ •* fg
InUm '''"t-5 •^f-J-\'** '\' ^"~'""/S"^^""/'\— ^"v.'/fe
•HT^O'^-Cr- f ^vf-.^xT^c^^r 1
i 7
1 / /
CD O O
A "* •
i E 3 4
° O 3 ^
-• c . "*
••• 5' c
< •o i
o wo
— o
« A
o
•< 0
^^ (k
? °
«"
(•
• DTI z-n < r-nc/>< w<
" D5' *5' ^oo« 5 »5'o« o •
tt* — '•* < 2 Z*< M — • -*•< a.'<
• ""*> ^^° ° OOQ °rt^'
3 5*2. O*110 ^* 3 *^° •
• o 2 * ** • ^** •*
H. i HC30
o a »ni
D IP
ix im>
3)
Ofti
i S
1 Xm
/ mr
f sr
/ *
^ \
o —
5 * '
H?
S.P
M o
• a.
c
O •"
0
u ^
3'o
1
s
H
Z
*
M
I
a
o
i
i
A
?
n
n
5
s
c
5
8
P
s 3
r 5
S
5
n
j
i
£
a
§
8
2
OHO
o o a
» H O
m > c
i r z
2 o °
« «3 P
S*2
jc
<7
-
j
^i
o
•hj
^^
o
•n CD a
c
5
~
-i
.
a
O
Q
-^
a.
a
•
•%
l
O
•
a
<
^
n
3
o
-*
Q
•1
•<
It
tn
ro
OJ
CD
c
o
x-
Sawyer ;
z
•^
»
CD
O
a
s .
P
s?
O
8
0
M i
t
'
*
' i
CD
1
tM
0
o ;
o
33
op
S. 3
o
, Colora
CX
0
<
Q
-*
a
-*
<
A
—
to
ft
1
<
o
•
•i
2 -t a
S E 5
3 m m
u
6
a
O
0
__
ro
i
M .
>
H
CD
ro
^
Q
X
—
o
o
i
ro
03
3
z
;£
% w
| —
0
o
,
CD
o
.m
o
r
30REHOI
i^
> 3»
j*)
tn
— —
j>
ex
o
•71
•-•
-------
WELL SP-1
NO LOG
A-86
-------
WELL SP-2
NO LOG
A-87
-------
WELL SP-3
NO LOG
A-88
-------
BQREHOL F SP - 5
LOG OF BOREHOLE
c
E
O
£
a.
a
O
£
jj
c
or
o
o
o
X
o
H
^
«—
.^
o
or
a~
*_,
c
0
r
'w
|«
<2
00
Oo
-10
_J
o
c
o
"c
o
2
o
o
o
X
0
O.
VI
0
o
O
_
~ ~™
o
^_
—
o
?
J_
o
UJ
O
a:
a.
inrr-rrnonns 34-78~3ldc nRtt t PR Northern Testing
Laboratories
r.annknFiFv ~ 5079 Bill ings , Montana
TDTAI DFPTH 9' RIG Hollow Stem Auq«r
nnRFHOi P DtAU 9 ' BIT(S)
Fiuin
DEPTH
0-1.5
1.5-3.0
3.0-4.5
4.5-6.0
6.0-6.5
6.5-8.0
8.0-9.0
MATERIAL
Sand, Silt & Gravel
Sand & Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Sand
Clay
Sand & Pebbles
Shale
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
PAGE -J OF-J
START FINISH
nATF 6-22-82 6-22-82
llfllr*^'^*- >^*- « c.c_ \j fm
TiUF 0800 0910
GEOPHYS LOG
YFS X wn
Very fine sand and silt , minor clay , gravels to 3" diameter , brown.
Medium to coarse sand, minor clay, gravels to 5" diameter, brown
to dark brown.
Coarse to medium sand and gravel, gravel to 2" diameter , abundant
Clay and silt, clay lenses are about 2 to 4 inches thick, water
•at about 3.5', no odor, no discolored samples, green-brown.
Coarse sand, clay lenses to 2" thick, minor gravel , water ,
no odor , brown .
Hard, greasy clay , greenish-brown.
Coarse sand and silt, pebbles to 1/2" diameter, buff orange stains,
water , no odor.
Shale , carbonaceous , hard, dry , very light
, blue gray.
,* 2" 10 Sehtdult 40 Galvanlzid
~f f| St««l Gating
Ground -^^
Surfaci >, L67
f^ K sT ^
ly ^~i
^^
I-! -£t — Clay Drill Cuttingi
'•°- y ^
3 9
m M
Km ijt-- B.ntonllt
H B 1/2" Volclay P.ll.t.
E^B •&•
H H
z.o'- H m
K|1 t^l—IZ-20 Silica
f^**' "' \
[•'«'.' •-;
4.83— t;--/::
P*c:v:
-< ° '.-'•
:iy £*: — .020" M»»h
'Q ^ ;•/
'?•'. P :J7.
':<'.: c :j£
Q 5 ' '«*«SM • "•
-:1:- '•JPT'' ~~ 0 r 1 v « Point
Sand
Oriit Point Serxn
A-90
-------
PROJECT, Cosper Toxoco Monitoring
Well Drilling
Texaco Refinery. Casper. Wyoming
LOGGED RV Henry R. Richter
I
10
*
v>
1
"O ."* w _ ^
N u 0. 0. Q.
1 f III
HHif^vviT^&vjiVv^^
HB?!*ilp0r>^f»"ol'lJ0l
Hffc;ipy;o.\yiy^^
II 1 1 II
^ °> O Q TJ O O ^(D O
Nt — N 7 i NS •"
• ° N = 'o 3
<3 ' O n N
- 0. - „
3
oj — P5 js o~> .t* 01 ;-- o
V-v en b 01 b ^ O 01 |
71 ' ' i i i . ' .-
r-. ot •— CO H 0* -t» w oi
Iv, 0 0> o^OtnO
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
3*O O OQOO O Q
Q 3 3 3333 33
— O. 0- O.O.O.O. O. O.
CP £D {p jp p p co
^u
^ o o o o o -*
i 1 2 o 2 2 o>
•* * •?< toco«QW3:»oco'co''-co<2<
= o 3-0 a~* S"° ° ° 0. o «» »
"*S — 3 2x0. }J o 3 3 3- -j-o. ^J
n o. O ** H — c* 3 l/l ° ** A -i c*
V "3. 0 " =3 J* 0 0 0 'o3 s'
1 ^cr'JSooQ.crcra- _»o o
_ o o*0 5'- 9 ° 0<12 S
— tH ° S.o • ° o'S "jj
• u* •* 3 ' •* 3"? 3
0 ^0. •O £ -_ o.
^•^^~ O °-m 5 " O M ,0
o «^ ^ n £— -•
jN. .5 "^1 o-? -^ --
• •* -*» O "^ rt O u »O
^ o ^» ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^< ™* ^
Of/I ^ A^^M • r? ^
»rt ** ^D.^^.. ^S
3"* S ^o 5-*" o ""
°1 =» 2 " S Q 0
. S"— ° » N
^ •* M *^ •* ^
o 9 •*• " o "**
o ~* ^ 2* ™ ^
< o °2 S- *. 3
2 <» •> — » • 2,
i ar-< 3 o. «
• o; S «;. -D ° '
i» 3 ^~ O 3 O^
S c? = * ^
. -» o. -» o
' 0_ S <» <
"^ o o 7 =»
O 0.
»< o
.
0
m
•a
X
E
-1
n
X
t~
o
n
u
-l
5
x
z
0
o
K
K
n
-l
M
•n
i
1
B
O
2J
n
z
S
3
C
frt
:
S
w
|
m
CO
X
z
o
^j
3
-(
~
o
•n
H
3^
W
03
5
X
o
o"
0)
o
3
c
0
o
»-\
J 1 •
3 =
O 3
D f
3C
-c
oo
r
0
o
o
37
8
z
3
2
3
J
Ol
O
00
CO
3
0
0
3
a
3
O
^ c
r *
•» •-
n P
rj
m f
o '
f
_ c
Wl
o !
0 r
c
r
r~
o
"1
o
•b*
O
1
»
M
3
»
H
T
7\
\)
Ni
1
S
\1
n
Ii
a
o
3
^
§
3
[ft
CM
-f^
.1
CD
1
O4
O.
O
O
3]
r
in
z
a
™i
3
H
9
•~
a
w
H
Q
H
''l
E
y>
I
O
o
~n
CD
o
33
m
x
o
r~
m
CD
O
7>
m
X
o
r
m
m
to
T3
I
-------
RDRPHOI F SP-8
c
e
o
o.
o
O
o
c
CC.
o
o
o
X
o
r-
o
0
re
Q.
LOG OF BOF
LOC.or COOf
GROUND EL
TOTAL DEP
BOREHOLE
,n, 34-78-31 db
PV ^-5082
TU 11.17'
n.AU 9"
DEPTH
0-1.5
1.5-3.0
3.0-4.5
4.5-6.0
6.0-7.5
7.5-8.0
8.0-9.5
9.5-11.0
II.O-M.2
MATERIAL
Sand, Silt a Pebble
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Sand
No Sample
Sand a Gravel
Sand
Shale
3FHOL F PAr.P 1 OP 1
nnin PR Northern Testing • . START- - PINISH
Laboratories DATJ_ 6.22-82 6-22-82
Billings, Montana TIME 1010 HIS
Rir, Hollow Stem Auger GEOPHYS LOG
m-rrsi — _YES_X.NO
Fiiim
DESCRIPTION AND COMHJENTS
Very fine sand, silt and pebbles, pebbles to 1/4" diameter ,
minor coarse sand, brown.
Medium to coarse sand and gravel , slightly silty, gravels to 3"
diameter , brown .
Coarse to medium sand . gravel and pebbles to 5"and 1/4" diameter,
respectively, slightly silty, brown to buff.
Silty medium sand and gravel, gravel to 5" diameter , water at 5,
buff , no odor.
Coarse sand and silt , minor pebbles -to 1/4" diameter , moderate
sorting , round , buff to brown , no odor.
Add auger, no sample.
Coarse to medium sand and gravel, gravels to 3" diameter ,
clean, no silt , poorly sorted , brown, no odor.
Silty sand and pebbles, some clay , no gravel , dark brown , no odor.
Shale, carbonaceous, hard , dry , minor fine sand laminae,, blue-gray.
s-Z" ID Schtduls 4O Galvanlltd
_ -r- r^f St««l Casing
Ground ^ '11
Surfae. N. 2-S7'
. A 1 A L
'flB
H H
H H -B.nfonltt
H H l/2" Volcloy P. II. It
"°'~ R m
\^ 71^
A/ \i CUan Drill Cuttings
v/ A ^
/. t ^./
5.0— *7 ^
"c. X'i
:: i^ 12-20 Slllea Sand
I' *".• «
6'92'- ~^'&
*f%
:-''°:^ .020" M«sh Orivt Point Sers«n
-:.' c '•*'
~:-! ^J'V1
*••" li.*^
:•';"; q."^
10.5- ^iSSS
i'J'W^> Drill Point
A-92
-------
Casper Texaco Monitoring
Well Drilling
LOCATION Texaco Refinery, Casper, Wyoming
LOGGED RY Henry R. Richter
to
10 co ~>j 0) OJ r"~ o o
b b '"» b b ^ en '
1 I I I ' . I O
<0 00 r>l 0> W — 'o,
b b o> b ° ^
M C/)Z O M COM
3*00 — - o o o •"*
Q 3 0 3 3 3 ^
— ex to *< o. o- °-
** O 03
3 CD {P QJ O3
•o _ w
— O O o „ o
"* "^ •« •» Z. n
00 o 55.
"~ ~~ "~" M
t/) 3O > «O '<"'>•-« -Z !I Z <
o 11 & oo 1 °| || 3
^
* >
•£?•.!• :.'.c*yy' 'V t ^"f*S •'•'* ^« -^ ^-^> ^"^ < BBPflffiBB
i n ^ |
r i' i^n
o • rr o vl ai
-^ O •* •* •
• O N DO
I O < =_
*D O «. I«
or w Z ° •
= 1 — — a
~ i n •<
o n ^fpx
S s 1 • 11
• ^ | • ^
•o » f
o
3
fl '
MO n "• « -. - i» Sc- Q.C
/ as 2* I 2,1 ° I3 'C3 -
*/ • 3- -*3 • * z; o- »"o °2 M
/ ' S°S.oo"*S«o-i
X 1 If S ?5 -S Is §| |
A O 3 «T t* ^ IT ^^3 •"** ^*
°M ' °"* • ° -»o ° ^i
"» "n"« 0."*^°
Jo. ° ^"jr ^~ * 3
— "* £
§ 5°
K ? r
2 5P
z:
U)
:
<°.
i
tn
O
03
o
j_
^
"o
Q
D
o
OJ
'1
CD
a.
•n CD
II
1
1
1
1
70
n
X
o
o"
en
A
3
>
c
a
"•
CD
3
O
1*
Z
o
r>
a
O
r
r~
r
o
cr
o
Q
o
M
TO
a
Z
0
rr
a
H
o
Id
~*
3
O
t
',
'
TO — > i
o z H -
TJ 1
-<
r—
O
o
•n r
o
to
o
n
a>
I
B
in
H
i
\> .
1 ^
TO
u*
X
•^
0
o
o
0
01
1
ro
ro
CO
•n
S
w
x
ro
O
CD
O
CD
O
3D
m
IE
O
f-
m
CO
o
3)
TO
O
r~
T) TO
O
m
•n
to
-0
i
<£>
-------
RflRFHOI F SP ~ 10
. , 1 (.
o<
c
£
o
•
k.
€>
a
••
o
O
*
>
k.
•)
c
«•—
e
tr
o
o
a
X
•
1-
to
f
J~m
O
ir
or
>
k.
c
«
Z
§£
r-O
80
0
-10
_I
O
c
k.
o
c
0
0
o
0
X
o
H
•-
a.
M
O
0
0
c.
k-
O
-
—
O
^
t-
o
Ul
~y
O
a:
a.
LOG OF
, LOC.orCOOf
GROUND EL
TOTAL DEP
BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE PAGE 1 OF 1
?o<; 34-78-3lcd DRIMFR Northern Tcsti-ng • , -_-^TAftT V FIWISH.
Laboratori«* DATF 6-22-82 6-22-82
PV ~508I Billing*, Montana T|UP 1250 1310
TH 14' RIG Hollow St«m Aug«r GEOPHYS LOG
H.AU 9" BITfS> — _YESJ<.NO
FI tun
DEPTH
0-1.5
1.5-3.0
3.0-4.5
4.5-5.5
5.5-6.0
6.0-6.5
6.5-8.0
8.0-10.0
10.0 -1 2'. 0
12.0-13.0
13.0-14.0
MATERIAL
Sand a Sitt
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Clay
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Shale
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
Very fine sand and silt, minor coarse to l" diameter, brown to tan.
Fine to coarse sand, slightly silty, gravel to 2 diameter , moist
at 3 feet.
Co'a'rse to fine sand, slightly silty, moderate sorting , round ,
buff to tan, moist , no odor.
.'.Medium to coarse sand , clean , no silt, moderate sorting , round,
'moist, brown, no odor.
Same as above.
Clay , hard, greasy, strong "chem pond " odor, black to dark blue-gray
Medium to coarse sand and pebbles, moderate sorting , very
strong odor, bluish sheen to grains, dark gray to blue -gray.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Shale, very hard , dry , carbonaceous, black organic flakes common,
Fine sand .laminae., . black to blue -gray.
--—2" 10 Schtdult 40 Golvonlztd
Ground -^ T r*f stttt Co.lng
Surfac* N. 3. 11
F^ 7ty$$&y '
NS*
Cl«an Drill CuMlngi
Scntonlt*
l/2"Volclay P.ll.ll
K3 B3
-;; i^ 12-20 Silica Sand
't r •"'•'
•?"• "•«"
^7-" '•£
£<}£, .020" M*»h Oriv« Point Scr««n
S; c ,v<
>. 3 ' '*•'
••; c'":
t"
Orivt Point
Btntoni t*
1/2" Volclaf P.llttt
....
A-94
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 6/28/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTIME
Well Name or Number SP-19 Permit No.
Well Location
County NATRQNA '.-.-. - • • .--•.- State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5081 Total Depth 8.5' Depth of First Water 4.0'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
GALVANIZED STEEL,
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 8.5 ft. Material SCHEDULE 40
II
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size set from 4.5 ft. to 7.8 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes No X_
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 8.0
U to depth of 8.5
A-95
-------
BOREHOLE SP- 19
LOG OF BOREHOLE PAGE 1 OF 1
o
C
£
O
£
i_
«>
Q
0 «
<•> £
> C
«- OJ
9 —
.EC
-
o
l-o
< UJ
00
Oo
-10
I
_*
0
C
l_
o
"c
o
o
0 O
0 C
X —
o —
I-'C
o
0_
*• ~™
0 «
0?
}_
0
UJ
O
K
0,
" LOC. or C
-nnanK '••'-- "-' • - rinn i FR Northern Testing- •. '' "START 'FINISH-"
Laboratories _.__,,„ M , «„ „,
nonimn F. FV ~ 508 B ill ings , Montana TIMEt22_C=_ .9-™p"
TDTAI DFPTH 8.5 RIG Hollow Stem Auger GFnPHY?; i or.
BOREHC
>i F niAU 9" to 8.0' BlT(S) -
1.5 to 8.5 FI mn —
— YF«; X Nn
DEPTH
0-0.5
0.5-1.3
1.3 -4.0
4.0-8.0
8.0-8.5
MATERIAL
Topsoil
Sandy Silt
Sand
Sand and
Gravel
Sandy Silt-
stona
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
Dark brown topsail with
Brown sandy silt..
organic material.
Clean fine to coarse grained sand.
Clean fine to coarse grained sand and gravel, saturated- at 4.0*.
No detectable odor.
Dry, gray sandy siltstone.
-!---_
T
Ground — — ^^^ 2.2*
Surf oc« ^v ;*
'^
t
4.3 — ~
7 fl.
'
.
e.3 —
.^— 2" 10 Galvaniztd St««l Gating
.-^jT
V,
-/,
'•!,
%
^
-i.
-Ai
X
[>
^v
v|j
•^
'\
\/
;N
'\
.y
/.
*'
^-
O
0
0
0
o
o"^
0
o
0
o
i!) ^^^^
-1
V
^
N^
Nj. — Cltan Drill Cutting's
7I
*/v
/'
1^
"•f
f*t
(\
t£+ — — . O2O M*ih Or(v« PoJn t Scr»«n
^
r\
\
(^
»V»Kl
-^•W5ij — Drlv> P"'1"
^T7I Split Spoon Sampler Boring
A-96
-------
Job: 1BZ
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 6/29/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form' -'MICHAEL COLLENTINE '•--•'• '
Well Name or Number SP-23 Permit No.
Well Location
County . NATRONA .. .' '• ' " " State ' WYOMING' ''.•.""
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY. BLOW COUNTS
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5080 Total Depth 9.3' Depth of First Water 4.0'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
GALVANIZED STEEL,
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 8.7 ft. Material SCHEDULE 40
II II II II
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
"" " ' M II
— " — || II
Was screen installed: Yes X
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size
H ii ii
Was well gravel packed: Yes
H ii ' ii
No
set from 4.6 ft. to 7.9 ft.
n H n H H
No X
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 8.3
1.5 to depth of 9.3
A-97
-------
BOREHOLE SP-23
LOG OF BOREHOLE
-
o
c
E
£
t_
4>
o.
40
0
o
0
f
*^"**
o
rr
o
6
a
X
O
r-
z
a»
C
c
o
o
\
*f
t>
0
>
i
>-
m
o
r~0
< UJ
Oo
Oo
-10
_J
0
c
i_
o
^
f—
o
2
0
0 C
0 c
X —
"~~ V.
i. C
CL _
A
A/%
C/
*\ -<
I-/
*v*/
^ / %
i-/
\\ f
— .^
* A
"\u
/ /
^
"W *%
r^
-Vv
Mx//
4QS?'
— Clion Drill CultlAgi
- OZO" M*th Orlva Point Scr««n
D T Iv • Point
__
A-98
-------
PROJFC.T. Cosper TOXQCO Monitoring
1 OQATION Texoco Refinery. Coiper. Wyoming
Well
1
VO
UD
TJ O
C 1
— <
(D A
Orillino LOGS™ RY Henry R. Richter
o
o
2
Z
m
z
H
H w R w -*i
2 o * o. b
1 '" ' '' '"
* 2. ^ •i^iVf"Yh"^»-^'-:*Vv«i>V*^V''*f;liiv«vv\^i^
3 c
W V)
«? o
IP
_. w
M O
D ^
°?
f »
o q
"* <»
n
a n
O.O
o.
• cr
n
n
=.
- - * VT*.t * t-.i • -^ i'j"r-"- * "• *| *••% s*.". (i*.»N*\. "*/^>^ — •
PSi Q°o?6°i
i%V'')'v'/ 1'->* ««* ;-'r « K-i.J.^|-//> -i^
VvT.-..--:-'ivj:,-.:i-T-*:-l>V>:^-MN v^T^>^
1 11
1 II
O • CD o
c r ° i s
o : ot o, 5
•< ? I = °
3" * o —
9 H * o
0 "" oi ?
o" <"&.**
"1 • W
5* -o
0 0^
3
oT "
. n
a
^rcn" ro O"
?§?? ? i
b en b °
in'tn v> (/>' en w
3* O O o O ""'
0333 3 -»
— 0. O. O. 0.
O 03
p> 0) 0> £P M
000 00
Q O 0 00.
» 2. 2L 2.
tfl'M'CO'M « 3; CO
MO 3- 0. 0 0 0 0 —
HI - 3 3l ^ -*°: "*
«"•• -* « ~ o ^l °
;° ° 2 '«• "g • °-
III Mil
01 ^ g * * '* =3.§
?- ^ i < J o ° '-"
_l |": M|
'PSfflrH | » oo 3
K^a ^ ? ? s-l
•^-^^"^^ 1 •< S-Q °
I N -i < 00
I '3- 0 5 S
xto'l _o c — -
"o o ^^ 3
1 z 2- 2 o < o
— * o <» 3 — —
•n .. • -^ o. .. "*
• ,^ a. o . cr
— *s^h "^ o ™ "^
i v^ •• 3 2; S
* V i CLo' 3
- 03 •
? 0.?
3" o n
0 T
<» O
-t
I
DEPTH
E
-1
9
J
r
OESCKI
•»
-1
O
z
^
z
o
o
o
K
E
m
z
H
SH O
» HQ
l?l
C m m
PI Tj r-
Q -S PI
ibl .
•c
u>
!
-
I
o
CD
ID
X
§
O
C/)
W
1
CD
W
n
o
•n
5
CD
§
2
X
o
o"
(A
3
^
c
0
03
aT
o
•i
o
a
Q
3
a
DPI! i PR Nor
,
H
f
_*
*_
*i.
T*
*
i
OHO
Sz$
•D m m
X
-<
r-
o
o
ro
o'
•s|
i
In
i
•'*
•^
>'
^
33
ro
'
m
t
o
OJ
0
•si
t
[Ji
CD
1)
X.
V
r
o
o
"^
03
O
<^U
EHOLE
CD
O
ZD
X
o
r~
TJ m
o
m to
•-» i
ro
• o -t>
"H
• 1
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 3-29-84
Name of Individual Completing This Form Tom Jaap
Well Name or Number S.P-28 • - Permit No.
Well Location 34-78-cd
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Chen and Associates
Name of Driller Dave Jarvi
Name of Owner of Well Texaco USA
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow stem auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5081.5 Total Depth 10' Depth of First Water 8'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (_
and attach extra sheets)
2" diam. from 0 . ft. to . 2 ft. Material PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes x No
Diameter: 2" Slot size 0.020 set from 2 ft. to 10 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes No
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx)
No. Sacks ^
Method of Placing: Dropped Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6i " to depth of '
" to depth of '
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY
^2
07 2
25s
c
•"•
a
3^
•
-
a °.
I
.
i '
^^xxNxv/^x^N^xsx^vxx/x,svxv/v^/v^HBI
^111 III I I 1 111
/ U 1 t 11 1 11 11 11 11 lUlllllii_
I ^T
O P m
K) ^ 2
: i ^-*
J5 0 q
O ?0 m
—IP _
< O N)
0 C :
O ~* °
2 § 0
m to •"
2 >
"0
m
r—
rn
— (
in
LOCATION CASPER TEX AGO REFINERY
innnrDRY LISAJARVIS
00 CD ^J cn A
cn NJ cn cn o °
i i i i '
vO CD OD -»J cn .^
b cn N> cn cn ^
to to cn to
0 2 2 22
trt ^O
^. •^^ 5?^ Qo OQ Oc
^ ^
g ^ O O O O
^ r- ?3 ;O X) 33
^ J; > , >
n rn p^ n
r— r- r- r-
o <* "D o tn o *A in >
C 2Q S" "^ ^ ** ^ ** ** c
xjo ^2.2; g e; o.o.'S
•nC o o „ -» J . . °- ^
mws-|j^|§f|
o «£f — » **" 3 o- 5T
js ^ or " ^A
§ 3 5- -J -q 9-. %
f\ JK - / ft A, f- .*
2. 2 V! J | r
31 ' 1 £ J 2 5
*O . ^* -j Q_ Q^
\ i H i?
' s - ^ 2
hj ij ^ .» 3
2. i . o .^
O ^ ^ ^ tM
-n S 3 °- °
< ° ^ « ^
n ^ ^ £ ^
o u» °" 5'
* ' W ^
> o o
^ i i. 2
o ^.
Q '
C 0
3 O
a. n-
*O ^
2 •»
3'
*A
o
m
I)
I
-r
«Jk
-H
m
X)
~
r—
m
O
X)
•55
U
—1
O
2
2
0
O
2
m
2
— 1
in
CD -H en
0. O XI
X3 -< 0
rn ^ C
X ^ 2
O o C7
' — rn ~
^ tl
O ~J m
^> i"^ r^
z.
ONi
_»;
•Xj
Ml
>!
Q
•n aj PO
C jH CT
o tn
i
1
I
1
1
1
|
o"
CO
^*
3
c
-\
^
cn
o
CO
cn
•
r—
O
o
0
X)
0
o
XD
C>
W
-».
1
^1
03
1
M
n
o-
o
/^J
o —
f^
VI f—
*^ i_ -.
-\ ~
<
^
O
3
5'
2-^^
S 5>
-o
in
0
a
n
^^
m
W
ro
00
03
^
-c
m ' M
N
•z
o
NJ
03
03
-^
n
^
a.
1A
O
0
ft/
*»
w
CO
— 1
3>
•^
•n
«B~
2
CO
I
r™"
o
cn
o
~n
CD
O
73
m
X
0
1 —
CD
r-»
X)
m
I
T> P
X
O
m
—
O
•n
~"
•n
in
i
K)
00
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 9-19-84
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SP-29 Permit No.
Well Location 34-78-31 dca
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Northern Testing
Name of Driller Bill Neff
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Mobil B-50 Hollow-stem
Data Available (attach copies if available) auger
Sample Desc. x Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5079.77'Total Depth 5.7 Depth of First Water 2_
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( ]
and attach extra sheets)
4" diam. from 2.04 ft. to" 5.5 ft. Material Schedule 40
PVC 1120
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory cut slots
Size of perforation 0.025 inches by 2.7 inches
Number of perforations and depths
400 perforations from 2 ft. to 5.5 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes x No
Diameter: 4" I.D. Slot size .025" set from 2 ft. to 5.5 ft,
it n
Was well gravel packed: Yes x No
Type of pack 8/16 frac sand
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1.2 gal/sack (Sakrete)
No. Sacks 3
Method of Placing: Dropped x Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
10 " to depth of 5.7 '
" to depth of —'
-------
b "fc "la IB
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY
LOCATION CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
LOGGED BY LISA JARVIS
"• •»
2^ H
"* 3
r> •*
i
.*.
en
m
to
o
r-
>
0
> .
o
in
cncnw-^03
tn
I 1 X Q. v
^ Z Z. £ %
o •*
CL. -•
O
o
S
S- ' §
§
8
2. 3 °
Q. *» I
O "
5 3
s
CD
O
X»
m
g
23
en
X)
o
o
o
XJ
o
o
o
X)
o
CO
CM
••» co xj
en
in
ro:
• xj
O H
is
S LOG
03
•J5
XJ
en
a:
(D
O
CD
a
CD
a
a
-o
a
m
O3
O
O
cn
TJ
M
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 9-19-84
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SP-30 Permit No.
Well Location 34-78-31 deb
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. . Northern Testing
Name of Driller Bill Neff-Driller / Steve Cromwell-He!per
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Mobil B-50 Hollow-stem
Data Available (attach copies if available) auger
Sample Desc. x Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Loq Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type]
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5083.30 Total Depth 12.9 Depth of First Water 5_
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( ]
and attach extra sheets)
4" I.D. diam. from 2.1 ft. to 12.7 ft. Material Schedule 40
PVC 1120
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory cut slots
Size of perforation 0.025 inches by 2.7 inches
Number of perforations and depths
800 perforations from 3.5 ft. to 12.7 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes x No _
Diameter: 4" I.D. Slot size .025 set from 3.5 ft. to 12.7 ft
„
Was well gravel packed: Yes No
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1.2 gal/sack (Sakrete)
No. Sacks 3
Method of Placing: Dropped x Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
10 to depth of 12.1 '
—' to depth of -'
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY
LOCATION
LOGGED BY
CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
LISA JARVIS
- 5 5 0 ^ ^ ?° °° ."^ ^ C* Ul b " ° °! ^ °3 99 oi b
toto tototocococo
to > 3 > 5 > z >>>'>>
-202 ^ 0 02022 222
to _i C' to o ^^ to *J c* to oo o o o
y* co 9° *" 9° 2*" "** < 9* *" P*9* 5?° 9* S^°
o o 0=50 ^^ o PO^ oo o o o
m>£> m >rn>>>>'>
r~ r- i—f— i—r-r-r—
to tO-^3r- to 2 CO COCO 2 «o«T) COO CO 2 i?00 n *0i° o'^i0 >
! PI! ! 1 ? \\ 1 il| i| ! | U 1 !? ii! 1
5 |^°-f 5 5 °- 1^- * ^.^-3 1? S3 ^ S" 5 l.o oo'S 2
"^ *" v« c 1§ ° ^- '**>/1 ^ *M o" ^ ^2. i **i 5* "*^ oJ°S r^
3 -3S-i - ^5^ o2g £3- g 0 2 M< 33* S
g.tn^.^^o 3.0, S2a. ,6- • i < ' 2. , w ' C
?'"<8^ 2 ' so S- S- c - 3 g- CD 2. .-^ 2 2 ?
* M o' * 2 "-b ^3.°^'* "« -° iL 2. "S
itp IS IH1 f f 1 ? M !
°*^- k« ° <5 f-0^ " J? r? 3"^
* ^o^- M-io -^ 3 -* "*'b^
QW^ "^ -*:
-* f =*'
2 § vo
2 a.
J» ,, v-^
rn
"O
I
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
>
2
O
O
o
V
rn
-z.
to
-n
r^
o
H
r»
(/
1;
c
CD
O
73
CD
r*
z
q
CD
— )
CO
o
o
b
b
X
to
^
0
m
o
^•j
K
^0
*~
o
»
1
^
c
p
5
— i
a
-j
£
o
m (
5
KJ
VO
•
;
5
?>
o
CD
1
01
O
-t
•7
' r
-
r>
0
2
*jf
iC.
&
"*!
-n
<
01
O
00
w
CM
to
7
^
'e Cromwell - H
-»
"5*
^
-i
o
^
r*i
vD
l
*>£
i
03
M3
•D
i
03
A
CD
2
i
t
•
.
t
r~
O
n
b
73
O
o
o
CO
w
1
GO
M
"*
a.
o
o-
0
73
^•"
1 FR Northern '
—i
*»
v>
C2*.
o
.O
r*
fc*
CT
/)
H
v
r
0
•H
n
z
/i
r
^
a
Cl
o
~n
GO
O
70
m
1*1
X
a
r~
m
TJ
^.
a
-~
0
-n
K)
3^
n
m
o
73
m
o
CO
I
O
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY
LOCATION
LOGGED BY
CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
LISAJARVIS
ifl
5-3
a
y
— — W K)
S^ Ulb
'.v 1 III 1 1 1 111 II II 1 II III /
v^%VvV^s%\^\s^vJ»i$a$&
\ i / t
-f. z oo j».n
— -HO — ^
b c x o C2
po ~n z
en > F * ° 3
m 2 n "D v
0 Or- < 0
•0 > T Om
< z 5 n en
0 0 •*- > m
n o P (/> >
> 50 ilj 2 ^
> q o
2 m Z
o r- a
0)
0
-n
K)
b
1
K)
vfl
•
cri
r-
(/>
O
m
t
if) O _ ._ __
CT Tl 5 ^^
*>O o" 2. 3 •§.
>5 - 2- "^
^° « i i-^
— ^ <» **
• 3! ^ x-
** — ^
<2 s ^
' cr °- ?
t ' 5 <•
1 M Q. ;;
.*s c
"H rv ^^
P I i j
70 cr g- ^
O ^" a. 3
n ^ 1? ^
o c Z. 5"
^ « 8 w
m "" °
2^ o_ jj-
-\||
o
.^
Tl
TJ
"^
I
3
— t
m
X)
>
r™
o
rn
//I
i/)
O
T3
—4
O
Z
2
C?
O
O
2
z
-H
tn
-n
3
o
3
n
b
r
P
1
c
03 •
o <:
*> i
3 '
o ^
•»•
o :
Z
q
!
^
•* •
•
CO-
— <~<
/*^"v
CD '
q
o
P
cr»
b
X
*
o
m
o-
tl
W
r~
0
O
^
<
5
H C
3 ;
H c
- ?
3 t
2 '
i!
K)
vD
n
7)
3
o
o-
03
Ol
-H
3
m
-)
O
z
•3
f\
•n
<
Ul
O
CD
•
If)
*
n
o
3
=
i
i
*
o
i
~i
rn
^3
1
v£
i
Jll
vfl
1
H*
vfl
CO
op
t)
o
5*
"^
(
^
-
j
(
-
f—
o
o
b
0
o
o
X)
o
01
04
*
GO
1
w
o.
o
cr
o
--
w
o
1
-1
VI
S!
3
I—
P-
/I
>
O
-t
•n
2
/\
t •
r
p
C
C
c
~l
c
c
7
n
3
C
r
D
T
D
T
D
3
3
T
3
o
m
K)
O
^1
K)
CD
O
O
-o
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 9-19-84
Name of Individual. Completing This Form Keith-S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SP-31 Permit No..
Well Location 34-78-31 deb
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Northern Testing
Name of Driller Bill Neff-Driller / Steven Cromwell-He!per
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Mobil B-50 Hollow-stem
Data Available (attach copies if available) auger
Sample Desc. x Geophysical Logs (Type) ^
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) ___HHI~~
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5083.01 Total Depth 10.0 Depth of First Water 4.5
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( ]
and attach extra sheets)
4" I.D. diam. from 1.8 ft. to 10 ft. Material Schedule 40
M M n n n n
PVC 1120
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory cut slots
Size of perforation .025 inches by 2.7 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1250 perforations from 3.0 ft. to 10 ft.
„
Was screen installed: Yes x
Diameter: 4"
"
Was well gravel
Type of pack
I.D. Slot size
n n
1 packed: Yes
n H
n n
No
.025 set from
M II
No x
"
"
3 ft. to 10
ft
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1.2 gal/sack (Sakrete)
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Dropped x Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
10 " to depth of 10.0 '
" to depth of —'
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY LOCATION CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
iftfirtm RV MIKE CRENSHAV
> > > CO
*£ 2 2 2 2 £=
•H ^* £Q ftg o^ y* ft* *w v! •<
CO ^* ^^ *^ '^ ^^ y*^ J^ •*" J* ^^ J>"
""'So o o o o ?5 I? 2co2
m > > > > g
m m n m
r- r- r- r-
:r C7> n < CO "0 CO a-f CO r- CO "7 "n -n CO r- i— m
•o "^ o ^T^oO'o °« ;=• •* x> XT =? =; x> — s o
;rft' n, i.oOo c Wo2 o >o^3 X.
«^J i* *^ 3 .r~ O C C *fc ^^ 3 C •"* "T* 3 3
^ *^ ^^ -^- 3 ^^ — y 3 o ./N ^^ or
CO «,— ;i/iDO1Ma)o:J_rS't''33-t/) 1 1 W>
c° -£i v\ tl °- ^QO" a.w 3' uS;""- = ^ «-co ° < i
-° «§2L|l^-< °i z gt« ^^r-i>i §.tt
o WM>§ o 2 * ^--ICL^ f" 2 ^a^S § S T » • a ^
i ~.°- sS 3v I 1 s?l -i •? ?S2 f ! ^^ ? f *'
^ 3 ^ 1 • < ii ngS.'^cS-.-^S-^0
^P *L v — .— — *• •* " )J 4, ^.O.a< 3 , 3 -^ »*
111! [ 3«'vi»(Cnr'ln V~'>/|U:.*'~'V*C?COOL "^
i^ii I 1 AC — o CT" j£i| v-t4w fn^ft/%m"nc^*
• ' • .' •+••.-..•. Js^sJ. -1 J 3 jr* ZL5 '*CT\ O>« — -3d.— Q^Ja-^
f 1 tlT0" S'-SS1"' ° S^.^^'SCD ^Q.^j
1 1 i 1 1 *T* "7* *^ ^ ^* cn . ^ A* ^- * 2 ^ * 2!
^ 1 o ft* * ^ f^ »^~ Cfl f"N ^ *( Sf ^~\ /A 3 ^^
2 *. rn^^D2.< n o J3 « jk °i.2LJj o > /^ ^J~*m'oc'» °_T ° " 3* "~" 32w> 2
^ ^ !•? ? |.a g -5!s £ «•! • 3. ;S 1
?o_< ^"S. ^^31 " J. JT ^ "^ 3
> cn ^" m J § »T ° ^J o ' * ^ "* -0"
"2. ^\ f-^i tO ^ f\ -P 3 ^* -3 ^ 3
°St)>'^::o5 ^-^'il i ^
Cf* /r^ ^ r~ -^ r*\ ** ^ w ' A/ T
*J2O<~>£" 5' '"S' »<
^ o v 3' w 3' /^
r*i ^ o. ^ 3 *° sC*
r- CO -, Q.
5 >c / £
j^ . t« ^. O
O W D /» T
/-» O. ^— *»
flkr
O
m
T)
I
3
^j
«M
70
r~
O
m
CO
O
TO
TJ
— t
0
2
>
2
O
n
0
2
n
— H
CO
CD -H O
O O JO
X3 ~* O
m j> c
O O O
rn 13 JZ]
S - T3
.
^
q
•
-Ah
0
cn
-<^
"n 03
i5
o m
Z ^
O
2
o
p
2
^™
P
X
CO
n
:r>
o
2"
CD
cn
o
CO
7
<
f
n
•n
0
3
<
•»
i
i
T>
x5*
^
i
r-
O
O
0
0
o
X3
O
CO
CK!
4k
1
00
1
w
— *
o.
o
C7
DRILLER
Bill Neff
|
O
1
S -• o
S 2>
J "3
-<
in
f"™
I/n
i /-^
,
^^
O
o
NO
i
KJ
*~*
CO
4k
U;
CO;
%
O '
w
cn
^i)
1
KJ
|
03
-0.
rf
0
^*
>v
->
^
-H
T>
V)
^;
3
JZ
r~
&/
cr
cn
•""H
X)
~H
-^
— .
2
CO
X
f—
O
CD
O
-n
CD
O
70
m
I
0
(—
m
-o
> '
o
m
— .
O
-n
""*
-------
PROJECT CASPER TEXACO NORTH PROPERTY LOCATION
— — i nnr.FD RY
ri^ 2
oir
2*1 H
c"»
<9
i
CT> *
v£ °o b cn
0 04 1 I
-si C7\
cn o
cn cn 01
cn > > >
1, o a o
01 90 •' 9* 90
o o o a
2 » 33 73
S I <
r- r- r-
"O O v* r" 5f CD (/) "^ -vj t3 CO ^** "*" *" /? o i i ^ 5\ ~*» **—•<" 2
/— T\ _L •£ .J <•»• • » "*• y - _L ^ i* O & 3 ^ V
^^
9 W M
' 1
••"' .'*•.''• '• ""••.*• *'•*.'••"*••.*"<••."*••."••.'*.••". ' .'J •is>^vV
• • • •. • •. •'•.'«."*,*.'•. •.'•.*• IxvVv
^ « ^ —. X ./^ a*o *»00^o ^ .^o
Tico03"^ 3§a? "* S w c S? 0*^* 0 ,-fc ^^ -j~ ~* O ~* »•» •*
pr^ V» • ^^ * * ^j ^— AJ *^ ^3 ^ ^^ ^J *
^•' "S "* o. i—r^ ^'*^v.v-..t.,t^r
I III
z jx A. n
c? ^ C 3
70 * .12
> -n ~*
r* ^ ^^ */\
in n o -o b c
> cn 'cn ^ cn 3
n ^ <^ O >
0 9 i n i o
— T *^-o<" 'OL . *• 5. 3 zr t* ~ », z
CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
i
A
cn
cn
y.
O
9°
o
X)
<
r*i *'
r-
<-
- fsi - c
-> 2 ?^ ft
° o " -T
3a?|2 ^
S ° " t i 1
Hi 3r «i
"si O ^ ~
n w i c
p | o 3 «*
co 3 o a.
-4 O a. 3 w
3 |^| 1
i ^ 2 ~ '
I ^ $ s. %
2/»< •» —4^0. v>»* ^2. •* i- •_; — • ^
CV. O — ft v\ S.'3"<» *»li ^ -*-W_^'O
pr)°Yl2S o n-To *.,-?TM ~° 5 -. ° -s
m 3 •• ja. ^ 3 o^.c ^\c°
SS q o
n NJ 3" 3 -t
-tjvi-0<2 St ^^S" >• or •• * tn OOQ. •*
yD SJ *^ ^ -*• C -^ ^ ^ ^ *— '
3 -o ^^ 3 a- o" ^ " < < —
m 5* ^! « ^- < o" 2. ? * S: 2
H^^il£ ."* -"^ i!. Z. A. -o" o"
"to- rn 5> rn m« *.i — '-^ rf'^o -t-7
2 -'OcnO^'O ^t,0- «"*= cno-3
o 3FiF^-°-3^ r 2. 1 £^22.
o -am>33!! ^Kf-. q:.|
'^'Xv-^ -C^ o33 Wf*£r ^_y O D
>g0 0 ... - v> ^^3 . ^ .
^^ r1 -. i ^ 2o
"~ 2- "» 4. -< ^
5- 2. a.
% 4>
a.
1^2' °-
N) 1 3 i
i3 ** "° 3'
— ^ § "°
" ^ ^
o" §
1 2 1
< CL
— - ^*-
a.
O
-Q
•— i
X
j*
rn
r^
- DESCRIP7
g
Z
0
n
o
=|
cn
CD — < Cl r-
0 0 73
3 ^ °
O O O
r" rn '
r'1 ~D P2
2 ^ D
3
_
O
I
CO
b
^
cn
o
03
b
.
O
O
o
o
o
PO
cn
-fel
^
CD
04
a.
o
or
"n QO 3O
f— — —
C
o
o
*
— 1
x-x
cn
o
>
o
o
••s.
1
o
cn
n
0
o-
CD
i
cn
o
cn
<
o
o
1
a
t.
03 O
•«. ^n
Tl
-«>
1
O
"*
r—
r—
rn
XJ
o
•^
— «
3'
r~
CT
<
O -i o
3 5.->
2 "\- c
w
01
r-
o
Cl
~*i
A
S
1 3
WD "
I
0}
} *•
m -' vo -
W
H
"2.
O
yi
w
Q
1 -
-0 i
1 —
n
_j
~
o
~»
n
;
n
CD
•*
r
a
CD
a
' i
CD
0
?o
m
X
a
r
~
m
•o
>
o
m
__
o
•n
1
1
i
i
CD
3
rr\
D
•n
V)
110
—
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 9-21-84
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SP-32 Permit No. '
Well Location 34-78-31 dca
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Northern Testing
Name of Driller Bill Neff-Driller / Steve Cromwell-He!per
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Mobil B-50 Hollow-stem
Data Available (attach copies if available) auger
Sample Desc. x Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 10.5 Depth of First Water 5.5
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( ]
and attach extra sheets)
4" I.D. diam. from 0 ft. to "10.4 ft. Material Schedule 40
n .. .. .. pvc 112Q
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory cut slots
Size of perforation 0.025 inches by 2.7 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1020 perforations from 3.6 ft. to 10.4 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes x No
Diameter: 4" I.D. Slot size .025" set from 3.6 ft. to 10.4 ft.
n n n n n n n n
Was well gravel packed: Yes No
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1.2 gal/sack (Sakrete)
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Dropped x Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
10 to depth of 10.5
" to depth of '
-------
-------
Basic Well Completion Sheets
and Borehole Logs
63
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION SHEETS
AND BOREHOLE LOGS
Included herein are individual summaries of (1) well completion
data, (2) lithologic descriptions, and (3) generalized well construction
figures for the monitor wells located in the part of the Casper Texaco
Refinery south of the North Platte River. All Wells were drilled and
completed during the time period, 12-9-81 to 2-7-82. All wells were
drilled by Water Well Services, Craig, Colorado; Buck Sawyer and Neil
Boren, drillers. All wells were supervised by Western Water
Consultants, Inc., Henry R. Richter, Michael Collentine, and Craig
Eisen, hydrogeologists.
All wells were drilled using a Gardner-Denver, rotary air drilling
unit. Two techniques were used during the drilling program to drill and
complete the wells. The techniques were: (1) conventional rotary mud
drilling, and (2) driving surface casing and rotary air drilling. In
general, conventional rotary mud drill'ing was accomplished by using
Hydro-gel (bentonite mud) and water to lift drill cuttings from the
annulus and to prevent the annulus from collapsing. Minimal success was
realized by using this method because sufficient mud viscosities could
not be maintained and as a result the drill hole would slough. When
sufficient mud viscosities were achieved, the project hydrogeologists
found that the mud excessively coated the drill cuttings and prevented
quick and accurate observations of lithologic changes. Wells drilled
using conventional rotary mud techniques are listed as using Hydro-gel
(see "Fluid" description) in the respective Log of Borehole.
The second technique used during the program involved driving
surface casing and rotary air drilling. This technique involved driving
64
-------
steel casing to a sufficient depth and then "drilling-out" the casing
using rotary air-lift. Production casing was then inserted to the
appropriate completion depth inside of the surface casing. The surface
casing was then recovered and the formation was allowed to collapse
around the production casing. Relative success was realized' using this
technique because (1) the surface casing prevented hole collapse, and
(2) the air-lift drilling did not mask the drill cuttings. Wells
drilled using this technique are listed as using air, or air and water
(see "Fluid" description) in the respective Log of Borehole.
Abbreviations Used in Basic Well Completion Data
The following abbreviations were used to complete the Basic Well
Completion Data sheets:
0.0= outside diameter
I.D. = inside diameter
Sch 40 gv st = Schedule 40 galvanized steel
Benton. chip = Bentonite chips
Vol = Volclay bentonite pellets
Sediment Size Classification
The sediment size classification scheme used in the lithologic
description is a modified Wentworth classification method. Sand sizes
and smaller follow the Wentworth classes, but sediments larger than sand
size are termed gravels. The following table lists the terminology used
in this report.
65
-------
Terminology and Class Intervals for Grade Scales.
Class Size (mm)
Very coarse gravel 32-64
Coarse gravel 16-32
Medium gravel 8-16
Fine gravel 4-8
Very fine gravel • 2-4
Very coarse sand 1-2
Coarse sand 0.5-1
Medium sand 0.25-0.5
Fine sand 0.125-0.25
Very fine sand 0.0625-0.125
Silt 0.0039-0.0625
Clay Less than 0.0039
66
-------
flQflgHQLF SS-24
o
c
o
£
w
O
Q
S ;.
?:£
Is
o : ;
ocW
s =
5 «
§5
t-a
oS
-10
e
o
o
o
U 0
o c
X —
1C
a **
o
u
o
«
a.
LUG Uh bOHtHOLh PAGE-L-OFJ.-
UOCor
GROUNC
•BOROS T. 33N.-R. 79 W. n»ii i FB Northern Testing . START F,NIS
laa • - - - Laboratoria* , . . »« "„ ., _'„
JPLFV -509
i a; CHI* u^. i^ DAI*-. ' <-: u^ /-if-u*.
1 Billings, Montana -^..^ii-nn .Q^<
TOTAL DEPTH ££ , sis Hollow di«m Auqar ^Fr)pHYS,n^
RrtRPHOLE OIAIJ 9 " BITfSl YES X NC
P? U1D
OCPTM
0-1.0
.0-2.0
2.0-2.5
2.5 -3.C
3.0-4.0
4.0-5.0
5.0-6.6
6.0-7.5
7.5-iac
K7.0H2J5
12.5- 1 5.C
15.0-17.5
I7.5H8.0
' I8.0H9.C
I9.0-E2JC
UATCXIAU
Silt a Sand
Silt CtayaCn
Clay
Silt Sand a Go
Sand a Gravel
Sandy SiltaCtar
Sandy Silt a C105
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand. a Gravel
Sand a Gravel
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
OCSCXI^TIOM AMD COMMENTS
Silt and fine sand, light brown.
t Silt, clay , and fine gravel , dark brown.
Clay, moist, plastic, black hydrocarbon stain, blue -gray to gray.
Sllty, clayey coarse sand, minor coarse gravel to l"in diameter, dark brown.
Coarse sand and gravel, very poorly sorted, dark brown.
Sandy silt and clay, Hydrocarbon odor, gray.
Same as 4..0 to 5.0* .
Medium sand*'and clay .minor fine peobUe, strong hydrocarbon odor and
stain , dark brown.
Medium sand , no silt . minor fin* pebbles and coarse gravel , moist ,
gasoline odor , yellowish-green hydrocarbon product , light gray and flat gre)
Medium to coarse sand, poorly iort«d, lubrounded , strong gasoline odor,
no silt, wet at 12.5, blue -green sheen on cartings. Slack io bluish -gray.
-Medium to- coars-e sand and. gravel, poorly *ort
-------
u WCLL. COMPLETION DATA
Date: 7/15/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-25 Permit No. 60806
Well Location T33N-R79W-laa
County NATRONA
State WYOMING
Name of DriVHng.Co. • - NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach-copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Water Chem.
Drilling Time Log _
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Pump Test
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5096 Total Depth 22.5' Depth of First Water 15.5'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
2" ID
diara. from
H M
ft. to 20.5 ft. Material
a n - » •
PYC
Perforations:' Type of perforator used _
Size of perforation" "''" " inches by
incnes
Nuntier of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to
^^^•^•••^^••^•^M*- ... u *i^^^^^mi^*^^*^ ._ .-
ft.
n
Was screen installed: Yes X Mo
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .018" set from 10.8 ft. to
19.8 ft.
~
Was well gravel packed: Yes X
Type of pack 8-16 FKAC SILICA SAND
M
No
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
X ; rubber shale
8ENTONITE
; other (desc.) PELLETS
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:dropped - X
Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of
" to depth of
22.5
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 12-8-81;
I2-9-8I
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number SS-1 Permit No. 58572
Well Location 33-79-laa
County Natrona • State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Cham. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History :
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 45 Depth of First Water
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth "
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
4*" O.D. diani. from P ft.
II II U
Perforations: Type of perforator .us
Size of perforation 0.10
to 27 ft. Material Sch
ii ' •"" ri u • •' "
ed saw, pre-cut
inches dy 3
40 gv st
incnes
Number of perforations and deptns
240 perforations from 27 ft. to 32 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes
Diameter: Slot size
Was well gravel packed: Yes X
Type of pack pea gravel
No X
set from ft. to
NO
ft.
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Bentonite
Depths of Bases 20 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1 ;. \
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 " to depth of 45
" to depth of "~~~
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE
SS-I
LOC. or COORD
, 33 -79 -laa
c.amtnn n ev = 5O86
TOTAL DEPTH
45'
««.*»<« e niA* S'/z" to 45'
OC^TM
0- 13
13-34
34-35
35-38
33-45
• ATT
-
WltOM
t
Off^M
«AT»t*».
V*ry Flat Is
Medium GraY«4
Coari* to
V«ry C4«r*«
Saad
Caar.i* Sand
to Ftn«
3h«U
3k«l«, Coal,
and V«ry
Silty Sand -
tton«
OF
IILLES Wat«r W«ll S«rvict« START PIHIS-
Craig . Colorado i?.fl_fl, t^~^.
Suck Sawy«r • N«il Bar«n Tlue 1500 1500
ate Gardner - 0«ny«r Ratarv nFnr,,r,,nr - T1.T v ,
at
Ft
•ot.
Tfsl
urn .Hydro-a.«l
eaemrrtOM AMD eoHHUin
41/2" 0.0.-3cA«duU 40
'H! §3 C«m«n« S«r
-------
WC.LL tui'ifuti i(JH UHIM Date: i^-IO-di
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; H. Collentine
Well Name or Number SS-2 Permit No. 58570
Well Location 33-79-lab
County Natrona • State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log __^__ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 47 Depth of First Water
Depth of .Artesian Zone __ Final Water Depth ~
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( _ )
and attach extra sheets)
4j" 0.0. diam. from 0 ft, to 7.5 ft. Material Sen 40 gv st
"
„ — — — — — u M — — ^— „
Perforations: Type of perforator used ^ saw, pre-cut
Size of perforation Q.1Q incnes" by 3 incnes
Number of perforations and aeptns
240 perforations from 7.5 ft. to 12.5 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No X
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
n "~"~~~™~~~~' u i» "~~~~""~~" n n •^—— |f (| ——^— „
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack-' pea gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: Dropped '• X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 " to depth of 37 '
" to depth of 47
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE
ss-2
PAGE I
LOC, at CQOHOJ
GROUND EL£V.
BOREHOLE DIJ
, 33-79-lab
s 5035
47'
kU.
6 '/a" to 37'
3" to 47-'
OtfTX
0-1
1 - 2
3-5
3- 15
15-17
17-20
20-33
33-34
34-37
37-39
39-47
rvM.
• AT*
coac
Sc33
Jwnj^i
MATUttAI.
Slit and Clay
Silt and
Clay With
Fin* Sand
F1a« to M*d.
Gravvl
Medium to
Caart* Sand,
Flo* Gra»«l
Coart* to
V«ry Caart*
Sand
Mtdlura to
V«ry Caart a
Sand
Medium to
V«ry Coart*
Sand , Fin*
Clay
Medium to
Very Caart*
Saad, Caart*
to Hne
Gravel
Slial*-
SJioie, Coal
Orqanlc
Shal*
OR
,,«.„ Watar W*M Sarnie*. START nNIS
Craiq , Colorado «vrpl2-IO-8l I2-IO-3I
Buck Sowyar ; N«ll Bortn Ttur 0730 1300
R1C
Bll
FU
m*
i Gardnar - 0«nv«r Rotary KSTIPMYS LOC YFS X HO
•fsi ,
JIB Hydro-q«l |
aacMpriOH ADO COM Man '
LIGHT BROWN j
3«OWH
i
i
3UKF !
BROWN
3UFF
GftAT
O>«: 4 I/Z* 0.0. S«»i«dul* 4O
*~i3 Ground ~^ / 5aiva*iz*d S>**l Caitnq
>.o-J Sur^ac* >. >-s^ I' -
°2*~ '^ §; ^^C*m*»t Surfac* S*al
Ul ?*? J2*
3 Irf— ^ n?[ra* • 3 F». Slot«.d Caii««
ss£mS&f£S!s&
, 3=»«?
B
•
< 9
0 O
a a
u
ta
-------
12-11-81
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number SS-3 Permit No. 58571
Well Location 33-79-lab
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co.- Water Well Services - . •-
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 46 Depth of First Water 3
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
4i" P.P. diam. from 0 ft. to 25 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
————— n u ~"~~'*~~~ n tt ———« „ „
Perforations: Type of perforator used saw, ore-cut
Size of perforation ' 0.10 '" 'Inches oy 3 ip.'cnes
Number of perforations and depths
240 perforations from 25 ft. to 30 ft.
""" II II
Was screen installed: Yes
Diameter: Slot size
Was well gravel packed: Yes X
Type of pack - pea gravel
No X
set from ft. to
No
ft.
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: Cropped -X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 " to depth of 36 '
to depth of 46
-------
PHQJECT TMQCQ
P^|fo|«um R«coy«ry Pro|«c| LOGGED BY H«nry f
0» W O W O N Oi °*
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
o> 2
a5 H Z
**"«*- *T° _.
* ° °. °. 0. V » 0
r i i i i V §
crumitf •! "y \-IKK. M
^»|_ / 5
$j$jjfi ^P^'i^'yvX^'vi^' ^\ 3
T 1 7 ???
1 1 / I"C
u a on ~/-> o
V t h M ° ii
2 a =3 * b
HI — £ •» MM
o j = u rs
2 ft la J-
i ; " s j5
£ i s ls
* ^ ^
A a
*
!, RlchUr
in w
1 1
a * * a 3"
2.— S.—
KMOUB
O
1
t- a
0
m
r
r
o
o
a
o
*
1 !! 1
3
2J1
l|n
§|»
l\
}
M
O
i
3
o
m
e
f
3
04
-^
o
i
?
fc
5
X
a.
o
i
a'
i.
.".VI
D
3
1
B
f
i
a
or
o
in
»
a
<
(A
•
n
n
•
»
H
2
z
4
G
cn
o
T
CE
O
'Al
m
n:
o
m
2
o
m
o
•n
\
1
1
1
•
\
n
i
n
M
(A
1
O4
-------
SS-4
LUG Oh bOHtHOLh ™E_I__OF_L_
e?
O
C
S
O
>
„
(-1
a
U
>•
a
tr
n
u
a
X
»—
i ~
*
o
o
0
j=
^t
w
JC
U
t
>
tefe
5
*^:
Z a
h- U
^ O
o a
O 0
-I -1
u
M
0
u
a
X
H-
»-
u
u
O
a.
o
u
<£
6
a
a.
o
a:
a*
,«. ^-on«,» 33-7,8-6 bb
ftnnnun n PV ="5035
- Tnrxi ori»TM 20-'-
£ i /— ** ».. on*
R(1J?FHQ(_£ OIAXL ^ &w
OC^TM
0- 2
2- 5
5-6
6-7
7-12
12- 18
18- 19
19-20
• ATt
| COOC
•01X0
Qdf.
MATtXIM.
Silt and Ctay
With VtYy
Ca«rt« Sand
Ftn« ta V«ry
Caar** Sand
Fin* to V«ry
Coart* Sand
Coart* Sand
ta V«ry Fln«
Gravel
Coarn Sand
to V«ry Fin*
Gravel
Silt and Clay
Silt ««d Clay
3h«l«
noit T Ci> WQ*4r W^ll O 4 r V 1 C V C CT« B-T e>it>i^ii
Craiq . Colorado «1TrT2-li-a! 12-11-31
Suck Savyar : Neil Sor«n TIVIF 1200 I7OQ
HIQ Gardnar - 0«nv«r Rofary flrriBHYS LD« YPS X Ha
aiTtsi
FI_UIB Hvdro-«*__ '
'<^w*^S '$. 1&. •^ L3&$S&
'.^> ^' Ca«««t S»rfae» Seal
10— A' i i^« ii j* — 3 Ft. Slatted Caiinq
f!\U'Xlji^----OrlM Cuftlna*
-rn'_ V^.*,"«7r7V-»-
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA
Date: 12-11-81
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; H. Collentine
Well Name or Number SS-4 Permit No. 58573
Well Location 33-7S-6bb
County Natrona
State Wyomi nq
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev.
Depth of Artesian Zone
Total Depth 20 Depth of First Water 7
Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
4i" P.P. diara. from
•^^—^^-^— u n
ft. to 8 ft. Material Sen 40 gv st
a H ——— u H
Perforations: Type of perforator used saw, pre-cut
Size- of. pei
Number of |
240 pi
rforation 0.10 - inches by 3 - inches
Derforations and depths
»rf orations from '8 ft. to 13 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No X
Diameter:
Was well grave1!
Type of pack
Slot size set from ft. to ft.
packed: Yes No X
; rubber shale
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Dropped _
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 * to depth of __
" to depth of
; other (desc.)
Pumped
20
-------
PROJECT Ti»oco Inc. LOCATIOM T**°CO R«>lntry . Coipif ,
ptlroUum Rtcoyffy Pfol«c| LOQQEO BY H*nrv R, Rlchlcr ; Mlcho*
Wyoming
1 Collentint
O~4 ** N O 7* " 9
' ' i 1 ' w
g 8 s 5 » o ^
MOO tod O-UJU Ct~MUI ot» OM O "n OM
* ° IT ~IT "* S S ^ ° a — o — to— tor- 02
o o A —a 0 a „ o 3 — r — o — a a o .»
— •-"« •**< < f»«LO. < I J "i •% m 2
* "w"u * *o*8 ~a*° •- •— •• *o
§« = :>:» f?l v° ?° §^ «
^» " • • 3*: j i !^ s.
o u o o o o> r
MO ' r* 30 V V ^ C S
«3 Woa»»»-}9;>Vfrai. ' H
1 0 °
/ ? c
L >• 0
jiP.T'i^5ftH "\ x
| / |?
o M >a o , • i
— * 2 * ^ JTo
~**N*8^*-P
C O 1 -Q "U
1 ! is ! I!
A • • "*• Jf
" « ?| s e?
8 1« u £*
• aa a A
B » « -
ft •
a
9
-«
" >
2 )*
5Js
tS
K
^
*4
s
f
M
!
9
§
o
g
B
(a H O
o a »
» H 0
m v c
9 a °
M U
m Q p
o H n
r ac .<
^
01
a
CM
o
I k
Ln
m
c
n
x-
in
a
i
..
z
A
CD
O
-i
3
S
8
3
j*
04
1
Q)
1
or
or
o
2.S
a
n
o
o
a
o
<
a
^
J
W
*
3
n
OHO
i£$
y
u
i
•i
o
u>
o
0
•I
_!_
w
i/i
H
3D
a>
Q
X
E
^
o
o
ro
—
i
2
z
i»
X
a>
O
o
I 1
CD
O
m
o
r
m
•
s
o
a
rt
r
1
M
—
o
•n
M
1
Ul
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA
Date: 12-12-81
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number SS-5 Permit No. 58574
Well Location 33-78-6bb
County Natrona
State Wyomi ng
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Water Chem.
Drilling Time Log ____^____
Other (Give type) Well History
Pump Test
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev.
Depth of Artesian Zone
Total Depth 30 Depth of First Water 7
Mnal Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (_
and attach extra sheets)
P.P. diam. from 0
ft. to 15 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
n H """~~~~~* « u
Perforations: Type of perforator used_
Siza of perforation " "Inches by
incnes
Nu.-nber of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to
ft.
Was screen installed: Yes
No
Diameter: 4 3/4" 00 Slot size 0.020 set from
u ~~——"~~~~~~ u ir • tt n
15
ft. to
u u
18
ft.
»
No
Was well gravel packed: Yes
Type of pacic 20-4P frac-sand and pea gravel
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
; rubber shale
; other (desc.)
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks I
Method of Placing:Dropped _
Bit or Reamer Size
Pumped
6 1/2
11 to depth of
~" to depth of
20
30
-------
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number SS-6 • Permit No. 58578
Well Location 33-78-6bd
County Natrona
State Wyoming
Name of Drill.ing.,Co.. .Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem.
Other (Give type) Well History
Pump Test
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev.
Depth of Artesian Zone
Total Depth 20 Depth of First Water 6
final Hater Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
r P.P. diam. from
•~—~~~"~ It M
ft. to 8 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
n n ~~~~~~ u N
Perforations: Type of perforator used _^ ^_
Size of perforation _- ^__ incnes oy
ncnes
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from
ft. to
ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X
Diameter: 4 3/4" 00 Slot size 0.020
Was well gravel packed: Yes X
No
set from 8 ft. to 11 ft.
No
Type of pack- pea gravel
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
; rubber shale
; other (desc.) Bent(vol)pel
20 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1/2
Method of Placing:dropped - X
Bit or Reamer Size
6 1/2 to depth of 20
Pumped
11 to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE
SS-6
PAGE _j OF I
toc-coo*,:
5ROUNO ELEV.
TOTAL DEPTH
BOREHOLE OU
0«,T*
0-3
3-3
5-7
7-10
10- J5
13- 17
17-20
«»*. |
•ATC
-
, 33-78-6 bd
=»51O4
20'
iM.
I ** '
pciua
•
UATUIM.
Oork 3ro«n to
Block-Silt and
Clay
Fino la Uidlum
GrOVOl With
Co«rt« Sand
and Silt
C4«n> Sand
Coartt ta
Mtdium Sand
Wllk Silt
Caari* to
UcdlMM Sand
Co«rt« Sand
and f\n» to
Utdlum 6ra««4
SnaU
OR
ILLSR W«t«r W«ll S«rvic»* START FWISH
Craiq , Colorado n.T_ i2-'l3-ai 12-13-81
auck Sawy«r : N«il 8or«n TIMF 080Q I2OQ
RK
an
FLI
•at.
x Gardnar - 0«nv«r Rotary rcrfpHra LOG YFS X HG
•rsi
,m Air and Wat«r
oaenmoM *MO coHMoirs
BROWN TO BLACK
BROWN
BROWN TO GREEN
BROWN TO BUFF
GRAY TO GRAY13H BLUE
.4 I/Z* 0.0. S«h«d«** *0
oro«ind"«y^ ^G4t*4nic*4 Stool Casiwq
33
O
u
e
o
«
-------
PROJECT TMOCO IncT
Pflrolfum Rfcovtry Prol«c|
a o« * *.
o wo
i i >*i
O U ON
^^^_^.^u. fc-««»J««IMkll* 1 — — TT — ^ •» — ••••— ;j g »^wfvvB | VVJWIMIII^
LOOOEO BY Hinry P, F||chl«r; f,l|Cho«l CnlUnlln.
r ? ? ? ? ? ? T t ^
Jk W Ol Oi |v> M — ~ «>•>
OHtt O UOW°
o
N
M tȣU Mg M M
ar w« — ft » o a-
• £.»- 2*2 •>
? • •-« £„$ I
^ «M 0=U „
•M »a *7o •>»
~" 0. - —
t-nw M <<~>E
|»= = s|| 35| |S | | = 252 2=
2— "" — o • a o
4A"* "*t*^— W * (4 SS a^»
g a. 2.° 1 f * 5^ **
M
•*
2
o
5
o
"
8. o. u $. o. o. 5. |
1 1 1 1 1 J
^i4ISslw3[i'S}HHlL\>'t-?-Ni */*«Vt »'*»£ yp
U6I >
52 •<
-» e
SI
s
'cij j^^vj/s^'iini^^^^^^™ i
* ixvi?'' ^?Ri*i4llll /
^'twt**i'^^x^iUii /
*JV-VJM £V£'H||I /
£££$& ^^flL-* i~
•i-vi^f ^M.'wir «»tj mitt— v** ** ^_ ** i / \' * ./ *// v«?^^^'*x\.
•; i^.'i \ ^ * \*!-2f fi\ * /^ ^¥^ "^ f "" * ^ "\J / r/**' x v '*•*-•• i Hi
1 1 1 /
t»A M CB O O
in o" ~ e "* ^
N^ » * S *»
51 a •» •
•nj* " 2 •«
•« « •fi s>
a -o a *• B
1 »
A ^
*• -^
o —
•»\
a '
H'.°
iP
MM
• 9
C_
o • o •••
,S u . s
»? S "1°
fl * •*
^ 4 X ^
~
: CD -< « r
5 P 5 S
^ 5 ' »
m *»
C °
* z
o
X
IB
»
O
<
_,
o
a
^
O
X
X
3
jijl
fl"
g|I
i §
5
9
f
• M
^ 1
fi
5
O
a
a
8
t
fi
4]
a H *>
0 3 »
» H O
i o s
r 3 <:
V
at
j
o
01
O
-
O
•
•
u
01
~
£
J
n
H
m
Ul
I
oo
i
a>
a
o
?O M
-4
M *"»
0 M
C_
0
3-
3
|«
O
a
v^
<
*
"*
o
o
T
a.
3
•<
1
O
n
<
•
-»
30
O
O
i
•<
CD
C
n
x-
a
<
n
2
*
— •
m
o
n
•
3
o
op
e.S
0
O
o
Q
•*
a
o.
o
a
*
<
A
—
in
•t
•<
n
*
o H a
A\ •* W
a
1
«4
i
•<
r«l
••
ti
x
n
o
CD
O
o
at
O
o
^
en
i
M
H
I>
^1
H
CD
1
cn
i
3
z
X
CD
-
O
O
O
*n
CD
o
P3
m
3:
o
r
m
s
31
m
5
tn
ft
1-
o
_
01
(A
1
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: iz-is-ai
Name of Individual Completing This Form H. R. Richter; M. Collentine
Well Name or Number SS-7 Permit No. 58577
Well Location 33-78-6ac
County Natrona • State Wyomi ng
Name of Drilling-Co.- Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log _ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 60 Depth of First Water.
Depth of Artesian Zone rinal Water Depth ~
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
4V P.P. diam. from 0 ft. to 42 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
u it ^^^^^ M a
Perforations: Type of perforator used
- • --•
Size of'perforation "' incnas by inches
Number of perforations ana depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 4 3/4" QD Slot size Q.Q2Q set from 42 ft. to 45 ft.
n ~~~~~~~~~ ii u
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE SS* 8
o
e
£
u
>
:*
a
^
e
•*»
u
o
M
H-j
2
•
^
^»
u
•••i
CC
CC
>•
^.
c.
jq
S
O
•< 0
U jj
o a
j -»
u
M
O
u
9
K
H
t-
u
IU
±
a.
o
u
6
e
a.
o
ac
a.
.
tfr ^^otv, 33-73-6 ba
«»r.Mvn ct cv ='5110
• t n ' . . .> - , -
TOT»1. O**™ t'u
6'/2" to 60'
OCPTW
0-5
5-9
9-10
.10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-33
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-35
55-60
rut. \ cone Uumjr
HATt
•*t
&
X£
ia'ii-
.
MMT*(AI.
Medium la
Cdart* Sand
M«dium to
Coarn Sand
Silt
Silt to
Co an* Sand
Saal*
ShaU
Shal*
3h€l«
ShaU
ShaU
ShaU
ShaU
Shal*
n.,,,r. Wattr Will S«fvict« „..,. rm,.M
Craiq , Colorado 0nr\Z-iG-$\ 12-16-81
Buck Sawy«r ; N«fl Borsn -nu? 1250 1730
a in G
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: I2-L6-8I
Name of Individual Completing This Form Henry R. Richter
Well Name or Number SS-8 Permit No. 58576
Well Location 33-73-6ba
County Natrona • State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump lest
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 60 Depth of First Water none
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
diam. from ft. to ft. Material
~~~~~~~~ n M ~~~~~~~ n a —— n n ———
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation" --•-••-- • jncnes by
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from _ ft. to _ ft.
— — „ „ — — — n
II II ——— „
Was screen installed: Yes No
ft. to ft.
Diameter: Slot size
Was well gravel packed:
Type of pack"
Yes
set from
No
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 3
Method of Placing: Dropped ' 1 Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
7 7/8 " to depth of 19
6 1/2" to depth of 60'
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE -5S- 9_
PAGE _J OF I
LOC. or CQCWOS..
GROUND ELEV
' TOTAL DEPTH
BOREHOLE 01
33-79-1 ac
3 5108
59'- •
AU
6 " to 59'
OCf-n.
0-3
3- 10
10- 13
15-19
19-20
20-23
23-30
30-33
33-40
4O-42
42-44
44 -48
48-49
49-34
34-39
rmc.
• ATC
_coftC IMHU/T
MATUIAi.
Silt to Fine
Sand
Medium t«
Very Coarse
Sand
Medium to
Very Court*
Sand
Silt to Very
Fine Sand
Silt to
Fin* Sand
Clay and Silt
to Fine Saad
Clay and SHI
to Fin* Sand
Silt and
Medium to
Caarte Sand
3l(t and
Coarte Sand
Clay and Silt
Medium Sand
Caar«» Gravel
Medluar to
Caart* Sand
and Shale
Shale-
nun t m Wat.r W«ll S«rvic«« ,TAOT ,1M1.U
Craig , Colorado n.w|-4.-82 I.S-B?
Suck Sawy«r • Neil Bor«n T]Ue0915 1500
»fa Gardner -0«nv*r Rotary afnotff«;^ 'l~, t .^
31
FL
4 in
10L
Ttsi ,
uin Air and Wafer
ooe*mo« .A«O co-««r,
. BUFF
3UFF/ YELLOW
YELLOW /SHAY
YELLOW
Syrfaet N,
e[uFFE <^^
YELLOW /BUFF
42-
451-
59 —
f
\\
V •
»• »
T* s
5 :-
LA Sj
X, ^
i 1
itj 5
'ffi^i
^41/2*0.0. ScBedui* 40
Galvanind Sftil Coiinq
^*^^C«meat Surface Seal
— Orill Cuttlnqs
— «rave< Pack, 12-2O Frac-Sand
•3 Ft. Johnson Screen
< o
0 O
o o
o
o
e
o
ui
•^
O
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1-4-82;
1-5-82
Name of Individual Completing This Form Henry R. Rienter
Well Name or Number SS-9 Permit No. 58580
Well Location 33-79-lac
County Natrona • State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Ori11er Buck Sawyer; Neil Soren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log _^__^ Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History ~~~
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 59 Depth of First Water 39
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
44" O.D. diara. from 0 ft. to 42 ft. Material Sch
* « ii w ii ii — —
« i« n n n ii
.Perforations: Type of perforator used
iiza or perforation inches by
Numoer of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 4 3/4" OD Slot size 0.020 set from 42 ft. to
n u II - n it — — — . (| B
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack' 1Z-ZO frac-sand
40 gv st
inches
45 ft.
Packers
Type: Cament ; rubber shale ; other (desc,) Benton. chip
Depths of Bases 42 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing:Cropped ' 2 Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
6 • to depth of 59 '
" to depth of '
-------
o
1
«/}
w
Ui
0
—
0
J
g
w
«•
o
CD
UJ
_J
T
I
I
(
, t
U
r
O
m
U-
o
m
vIJ
O
to
7
fr
3
. i
1 0]
" t
a
CO
s
X
M
u
>-
CO
1
*, tn
K
J-
1
vr
o
o
K!
r»
>-
VI I
u* u £
f- 3 a
< 5 w
o t- o
M
U
>
«.
•
IO
"5
*
»_
*
«•
o
J:
K
W
O
•o
o
u
"o
u
tr
o
V.
O
(t
c
i.
o
CD
*
Z
i.
>
0
w
X
u
3
03
x^
t.
0«nv«r Rota
Gordrnr -
•cr
i
O
X
O
0 f- P
0 K 5 C
o
1
en
i
10
ro
g
8
0
k
5
CD
<7>
O
n
"
f\l
N
0
X
CO
N
> X —
UJ H a
0 ° 0
1^8
0 H K
« 0 0
t> >- ca
r
6
S
u
o
5
t
V
0
o
1—
t°
j
%
31
*!!
?s
—
£
X
tr "*
O c
"f *"*
-.3
4- 8
• 2 «
< " w
O • *' •
o— r •
!t N > 0
£ » -o j
O M ^ 13 1
£ O- \ .'...I. ...i ,
» * v^ J=^(gai:j
: ;
5 /
* o ^g§5Sj5spy
* o /*£-}.
t- * -ao &
I !•• 9 f o
H S % .sr
J ra n ^M
c
o
-^
> c
^ /i
i?
|S
V IjL A
a J'o S
S • »"• «
» ± o. i o
U C _N "»
o < co <9 < in
'T-"«v\I Kl!'Ji'|lm|/''^ii!>^'V' ^SW<*ii'C't^'V'
iiiisii
r-»-;"»lr\^j- > BH-Vi|'Wfr!^v| *2 jjj 5 S~|
S" ^ S' l!^? f* S C^ f CC»
"»-O *>£ O at? U-tj u o3 U O ° 3
i
N n n N 2 3 'S « S
' ' ' ' ' i « ' •
onto »° K o r) « w
u4»J3 0|oJo !jt|M'|U ~y AJUFffAB 030001 T"Ij'iio.M JU8A55iM — WhilaiiiJ
RuilUoAM ' JfdlDl ' A 1*1111 • u nin»1T"~HOI t VOnl -f 1 • -i * . 1 - - . ?. . ....
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: L2-L8-8I
Name of Individual Completing This Form Henry R. Richter
Well Name or Number SS-10 Permit No. 58579
Well Location 33-79-lab
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Suck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log ______ Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 23 Depth of First Water 18
Depth of Artesian z.one Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
4J" O.D. diam. from 0
Perforations: Type of perforate
Size of perforation
Number of perforations and
perforations from
Was screen installed: Yes X
Diameter: 4 3/4" 00 Slot size 0.
Was well gravel packed: Yes
Type of pack - 12-20 frac-sand
ft. to 18 ft. Material Sch
r used
incnes dy
depths
ft. to ft.
No
020 set from 18 ft. to
X No
40 gv st
inches
21 ft.
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Benton. chip
Depths of Bases 14 ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:dropped -X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
7 7/8 " to depth of 23 ' '
" to depth of '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
SS-II
PAGE _J Of I
lfy ~r«o»n-< 33-78-6 b
V B * V
•r ti , U— — Orill Cuttiaqs
• V
J ! I ?!
••' I* ft ^
i^ I' v
2 ^ ,!_:£— — 20 Ft. Slotted Cau'nq
'-< n II s.
*, d b b
a n I v
}' a "I I«
^ « 5 £
23'— •» » ' l
"
o
i=S
X a
o o
o o
a
ae
-------
Joo:
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 12-20-81
Name of Individual Completing This Form Henry R. Richter
Well Name or Number SS-1I Permit No. 58575
Well Location 33-78-6ba
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.), rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log _^__^ Water Chem. X Pump lest
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 26 Depth of First Water 6
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE SS-12
PACE _J OP I
LOG. or COOR03
GRODNO £L£V.
TOTAL, DEPTH
aOREHOUC DIJ
ocrm
0- 1
1 - 3
3-5
5-9
9-16
16-20
20-23
23-23
. 33-79-1 ob
3 5090
.28 %
1U 77/a" to 19'
6'/2': to 26'
«<*->
MATZX1M.
Brow* Sill
and V«ry
Flna Sand
Clay and Sill
Clay and Sill
Coari* Sand
to V«ry f !«•
Gravel
Fin* ta V«ry
Caar*« Sand
Medium Sand
Vary Caari*
Sand ta
Caart* Graval
V«ry Caarsa
Saad to
Caarta Gravvl
OR
i.tco Wottr Wtll S«rvici« STAUT PIHISM
Craig , Colorado «AT* 12-7-81 12-7-8!
Suck Sawyer •. N«il 3or«n TUJS- 0700 I5OO
Ric
an
FU
101.
i Gardnar - 0«nv«r Rotary CEOPWTIIOO YES X NQ
*'« ...
,m Hydro-q«l
aacMmo« ««a COMMOTS
LIGHT 3ROWM
BROWN
•
Ground -^ .41/2*0.0. SeAadoU 4O
Surface X ^Galvaniztd Stt«< Caiinq
-i « % ^"^«C«m«nt Suff ac* S«al
* «.
;,' V ^—Orilt Cutting*
It'—— fe 1 ? | ^
g I jjip —3 Ft. Slatttd Casing
•ls'— ;?J«'j.JJ^ And 8-tZ F*f«e-San*
\f *
o
a
M
HO.
>—
o
IU
-9
O
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 12-7-81
Name of Individual Completing This Form M. Collentine; Craig Eisen
Well Name or Number SS-12 Permit No. 58569
Well Location 33-79-lab
County Natrona State Wyoming
Name of Drilling Co. Water Well Services ' •
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. Total Depth 28 Depth of First Water 12
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
4j" P.P. diam. from 0 ft. to 16 ft. Material Sch 40 gv st
~~"~~™~~~~ ——— _____
Perforations: Type of perforator used saw, pre-cut
Size of "perforation 0.10" " inches by j inches
Number of perforations and depths
240 perforations from U ft. to 16 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No X
Diameter: Slot size set rrom ft. to ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack -8-12, frac-sand and pea gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: DVopped -X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
7 7/8 to depth of 19
6 1/2 " to depth of 26 '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BORgHOLg SS-15
PAG£
1
-OF,
inr nrrnnnns T.33 N. - R. 73 W.
0
a
TOTAL DEPTH 44.5*
RrtRFHrtLP OJAU 9 "
Northern Testing
Loborotorias
Billings, Montong
RIG Hollow Stem Augar
amsl
START
FINISH
DATS 6-23-82 -6-23-8:
TlUg 8:00 om 5:30 pm
GEOPHYS LOG
YES J5L.N
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
o
_x
£
K-0
00
Oo
0-1.5
1.5-3.0-
3.5-5.0
5.0-8.0
8.5-13.0
I3.5H8JC
C.
o
o
IU
o
ac.
a.
20.0-2LC!
21.0265
285-3L2
42L5-4S*
Silty CJay w/
Sand & Gravel
Sand and
Gravel
Sand and
Gravel w/
Clay
Sand and •
Gravel
Sand and
Grovel
Sand a Gravel
Sand w/
Gravel
Sand w/Gi-av*
Pebbly Clay
Sandy Silt
Sandy SHtstcra
asittydoy-
stone
Sandy SJttxtooe
Oark brown to black, oil stained, organic,silty ciay with scattered coarse grained
quartzitic sand and gravel.'pebbles up to I in diameter:
Brown to dark brown, very moist, lubrounded to subangular, quortzitic, silty,
fine to coarse grained sand and gravel with pebbles up-to I -in diameter.
Brown,moist, subrcundad to subangutar, quartzitic, fine to coarse grained san<
and gravel with pebbles up to 2" in diameter and scattered clumps of dark
brown, organic ciay.
Claan,light brown , subrounded to subanguiar, quartzitic, dry, fln« to coarse
grained sand and gravel with pebbles up to 2" in diameter..
Same as 3.0 to 3.0 with""(flcraatTwa slze"to"" o.o-. s«««a«i«fW.;c
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 6/23/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-13 Permit No. . 60794
Well Location T33N-R78W-6ab
County NATRONA . State WYOMING
Name of OrilHng Ca. - • NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller GEORGE SKAER AND JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample-Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
flther (Give-type) WELL HISTORY, SLOW COUNT
Sumnary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf, Elev. 5111 Total Depth 44.5' Depth of First Water 33.0'
Depth of Artesian /.one 33 FT Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casiflg-scheduie-(If-more-than one casing-per hole-give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
SCH. 40 GALY.
4t"OD diara. from 0 ft. to 42.3 ft. Material STEEL CASING
It H
Perforations: Type of perforator used TORCH _______^___
Size of Deff'CT*iticn '".'25'"" " inches by" 3 incnes
Munbar of perforations ana aspt.^s
160 perforations from 32.3 ft, to 42.3 ft.
H U ^^^^^^^ II
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 4*" Slot size .100" set from 32.3 ft. to 42.3 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack- 8-16 FRAC SILICA SAND (3 100* BAGS)
Packers VOLCLAY (BENTONITE)
Type: Cement X ;
Depths of Bases 2.0 FT.
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS (ia)
6.0 FT.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:dropped • X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 43.5
1.5* to depth of 44.5 '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE SS-J4
PAGE _L_OF.
irf ~ moans T. 33 N. - R. 7 8 W.
. ,,. .. 6 ac
GROUND PI PV-S US
TOTAL PP-PTH 68.5
Northern Tasting
Laboratories
Billings, Montana
Hollow Stem Auqgr
START
FINISH
DATF6-24-82 7-8-02.
!2:OOom 3:3O am
- YES X N.
oeprx
UATEKIAU
OCSCXtPTtON AND COUMCXTS
HO
•Oil
00
Oo
o
IU
0-1.5
1.5-3.0"
3.5-5.0
5.0-6.5
6.5--8.O
8.5H3.C
I3.5H5.C
15.0-16.5
Silfy Clay
»/
SHty Clay w/
Sand ft Gravel
Sandy Silt
Sandy Silt
.Sand and
Gravel
Sand w/
Gravel and
Clay
Sand w/
Gravel and
Clay
Sand '
25.0-26E
26L5-33.0
38.068-5
and
Sand and
Sand and
Grovel
Sand and
Gravel
Sand and-
Gravel
Brown to black, organic, silty clay with minor fine to coarse grained sand.
Sample Is oil stained.
Greenish brown, organic,silty.clay with minor fine to coarse grained sand with
scattered gravel pebbles up to 1/4" In diameter.
Light brown to dark brown sandy silt with fine to medium grained sand.
Light brown to dark brown sandy silt with fine to very coarse grained sand
and some organic mait«r.
Light brown, silty, quartzitic, subrounded toH«ubanau{ar fin* to coarse
groined sand with scattered gravel up to 1/4 In diameter.
Clean,light brown,subrounded to subanaular.qvartziric, fine to coarse grainac
sand with scattered gravel pebbles upMto 1/8"in diameter, and several
clumps of dark brown clay about 1/2 in diameter.
Same as 3.5 to I3°.0 with increased moisture content and gravel pebble
3" in diameter.
~ G!a8n,'light & sand and small gravel
pebbles dominate samples from saturated zone.
Same as- 33.5 to 38.0
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: //18/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
^••••'^•^^^•^•^^••••••^HB^MV^^B
Well Name or Number SS-14 Permit No. 60795
Well Location T33N-R78W-6ac ZZZZZZHHZZZ
County NATRONA __ State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co.. . NORTHERN-TESTING LABORATORIES • ••• . ••••••
Name of Driller GEORGE SKAER, JEFF HUCK, MORRIS ORMOND, TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Wei 1 TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log ____^__ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY. BLOW COUNT ZHZH
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5116 Total Depth 68.5' Depth of First Water 34.0'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule..(If more than one casing per-hole-^iv.e-numfaer.^ )
and attach extra sheets)
SCHEDULE 40
4*"QD diam. from 0 ft. to 42.2 ft. Material GALVANIZED STEEL
N M
Perforations: Type of perforator used TORCH
- -Size of perforation- •-- -'* " tr.cnes ay 3 "ir.cnas
Number of perforations ana ceptns
160 perforations from 31.7 ft. to 41.7 ft.
II
Was screen installed: Yes X No __^__
Diameter: 4j" Slot size .100" set from
31.7 ft. to 41.7 ft
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack • 8-6 FRAC SILICA SAND (2 BAGS)
Packers-
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale __ ; other (desc.) BENTQNITE
Depths of Bases l.Q' 4.Q'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACX
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Dropped '• X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 68.5
" to depth of '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHQLE
a
O
LOCor
T.33N. -R.78 W.
-6 oe - - -
GROUND ,
TOTAL nFPTH 68.5
BOREHOLE OJAM §_
Northern Testing
__. Laboratories
Billings, Montana
ate Hollow Slam Augar
BlTfS)
ginin
START
FINISH
OATEllill53 7-8-32
T1UP 12'OOpm 3'30 pm
VZS * NO
oerrx
MATERIAL.
OeSCXIPTtOM AMO COMMENTS
-4O
HO
5 ui
00
Oo
-10
O
u
O
(U
O
a:
a.
**.* —
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/11/62
Name of Individual Completing This Form HfCHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-I5 Permit No. ' 60796
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bd
County NATRONA - State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co'. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller MORRIS ORMOND AND TERRY TALXINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, SLOW CflUNt HHHI
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5113 Total Depth 37.5' Depth of First Water31.5'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If mo re--than.-one casing-per- hole give number (-__ )
and attach extra sheets)
- 2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 35.5 ft. Material PVC
H it "~^~~~~ it H "~~^————
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation" Inches by inches
Number of perforations ana aeprns
perforations from ft, to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No __^___
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .020 set from 29.1 ft. to 35.1 ft.
II -^———~~ |f u ~~-~~~~"~ II H *^~"~™~~~ II II ——— „
Was well gravel packed: Yes No X_
Type of pack -
Packers BENTONITE
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS
Depths of Bases l.Q' 3.0'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: EJropped '• X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
* to depth of 37.5
to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
SS-16
PAGE
OF
o
O
cc
o
=£
o°
«-«
GROUND
TOTAL
8OREHC
.^on* T.33N.-R.78W.
6 bb
eicv-5096- •- *- -"
r»FPTH 18.5
»pniAU 9"
OCPTH
0-1.5
1.5-2.5-
2.5-4.0
4.0-6.C
6.0-7.0
7.5-9.0
9.0-105
I0.5-I2.C
;2.5-i4.C
I4.o-ia5
-
MATERIAL
Sandy Silt w/
Rll Material
Ril Material
Co He
Coke w/CIay
Sand and
Gravel
Sand and
Gravel
Sand and
Gravel
Send and
Gravel
DRILLER Northern Testing
Laboratoriet
• Sittings , 'Montana
pin Hollow Stem Auger
Birrs)
FT inn
START FINISH
nATF7-ll-82 , 7-11-82
TIIJF 11:50 am 2:30 pm
GEOPHYS LOG
YFS X HO
DESCRIPTION ANO COMMENTS
Fill material consisting .of .black, sandy silt with chunks of firebrick and
pebbles up 2 In diameter.
Fill material
consisting of black to brown ,silt, sand and gravel'.
Black , angular, granular cake
Black , granular cake with lense of brown silty day
Yallow brown to orange -rad, highly weathered sand
|" to .2" diameter, pebbles of weathered red granite.
between S.O' and 5-3 '.
and gravel wifh large
' Brown to 'black •andTsird"grav«t-w?••< s«n«4Mi« 40
— z.' 10 PVC e««i»«u»
f
i
,
/
r — C««U*u»/
•^ SNt 0»«
V
/
{
'
"ti
-------
bAMC WcuL LUMHLtfluN DATA Date: //ii/82
Name of Individual Completi-ng This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-16 Permit No. 60797
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb ZZHZZHZHZI
County NATRONA State WYOMING
Name of Oril-1 ing Co. - NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller MORRIS QRMOND AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY. BLOW COUNT"" '
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5096 Total Depth 18.5' Depth of First Water 10.5'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing scheduJe (If more-than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
- 2*ID diam. frora 0 ft. to 18.0 ft. Material PVC
•» u n H it tt
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforatiori - inches by incnoT
Nuirier of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
~~~~~~~~~~ u « ~—~•—"•~~~~° u it ————. „
II —-~~"~-~~~ II II ———— „
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .080" set from 8.3 ft. to 17.3 ft.
n u '^^^•^•^ u ii •"""""—•^ ii
Was well gravel packed: Yes No X_
Type of pack-
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) BENTONITE
Depths of Bases 1.0' 4.0'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks I
Method of Placing: Bropped • X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
to depth of 18.5
" to depth of
-------
BOREHOLE" SS-17
o
c
'E
0
>.
5
>_
« ri
*~l
o
E°
Oo
_J
o
c
o
"c
0
S
a
o a
a c
x —
« —
w C
o
<3;5
H
U
u>
O
a:
a.
LOG OF BOREHOLE
LOCor<
GROUNC
TOTAL
BOREHC
wnont T33N. -R.78W. na\i i PR Northern Testing
6bb Laboratories
i f\ PV —508^9 " Billings , Montana
OFPTH 13.5' RJG Hollow Stem Auger
MpatAU. 9^ to 12.5' ams)
1.5" to 13.5' mum
DEPTH
0-1.5
1.5-3.0
2.5-4.C
4.0-5.5
5.5-7.0
7.5 HI. 5
II.3HZJ5
I2.5H3JS
MATCRIAl.
Coke
Sandy C2ay
Sand and
Clay
Sand and
Gravel w/
Clay'
Sand and
Gravel
Clay and
Sand
SUtstone
and.
Sandstone
PAGE _j OF_1
y *^" 1 1 °^<1^
•K' ' N
"•- £m%
. K'^3xV|
U--^- -r.^
c\i.S^
•.r%=="v^.
T{/ ==v/~
•± i- ~^"==i\*
iz.r—
* 13 PVC Cs.ln*
•w
:*«*4it s«r<««» s««t
I«nt*«lt«' P«ll«t»
:«u«»««4 s««4 ««4 ar*««i
:«ain«-« Aoea.*
si«t o»t>«<«e»
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/11/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-17 Permit No. 60798
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb
County NATRONA
State WYOMING
Name of Drill-ing Co. - NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller MORRIS ORMOND AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem.
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, SLOW "COUNTS"
Pump Test
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5089 Total Depth 13.4 Depth of First Water 7.5'
Depth of Artesian Zone __ Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing-schedule-(Jf_mcra .than, one- casing per hole give number (. .
and attach extra sheets)
2" ID
diam. from
It N
ft. to 13.4 ft. Material PVC
« u —~-—~— n H ———-———
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Sire of perforation - " inches oy
------ ^BH,.MM^^mm^M^^^^
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to
inches'
ft.
it
n
Was screen installed: Yes X No ____^___
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size TE50" set from 3.7
Was well gravel packed: Yes
Type of pack-
No
ft. to 12.7 ft.
it ii "~~~~~^ a
X ; rubber shale
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases 1.0*
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Dropped - X
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of
U to depth of
BENTONITE
; other (desc.) PELLETS
4.0'
Pumped
12.5
13.5
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
HQREHQLF SS- 18
PACE _J OF_L
a
O
tr
o
toe..
GROUNC
TOTAL
BOREHC
-noRn« T.33N. -R.78 W. nan i fa Northern T
Sbb •--- - -• Laboratorie
i FT FV *-*5087 Billing*, Montane
RFPTH 14.0* RIG Hallow Stem Au<
•u P niAU 9 " nms»
FJLim —
OtTTH
0-1,5
1.5-2.
2.5-4.0
4.0-5.5
5.5-^0-
7.5-9.0
9.0-14.0
MArexiAt.
Sandy Silt
w/ Gravel
Sandy Silt
Sand and
Gravel
Coarse Sand
Sand and
Cra-rei
Sand and
Gravel '
Sand and
Gravel
es^in<7 START FINISH
3-S.r.. GF.OPHYS LOI
YFS X,MO
DC3CX1PT10M AMD COMMENTS
Ory, brown to dark brown tflndy silt with scattered small gravel with
hydrocarbon odor.
Brown, sandy silt with pebble* up to 2* in diameter.
Dark gray-brown, sandy, organic illt lenses In light brown, flnt to- coarse
sand and gravel with pebbles up to 1/2" in diameter and odor of hydrocarbons ,
Ughf brown, fine to very coarse grained sand which changes to a dark-
gray discoloration, very moist and has strong hydrocarbon odor at 5.0*.
Very moist, dark green-brown, very fin* to coarse groined sand and gravel
yjth pebbles, up to 1/2" In diameter. Becomes saturated with hydrocarbons
and very odiferous at ZOA" ~~~ ~ " —
Dark, green -brown, hydrocarbon saturated , fine to coarse grained sand and •
gravel with, pebbles up to 1/4 "in diameter.
Same as 7.5 to 9.0*.
,^-+l/Z' 0.0. BI««k'St**l, 3«k«4»l» 4O
«*•••«• -^ J,- -p p>d*'"~
""** VML f V ,lb-.i
^> urf_ m M
to-- H H
• -. — J ;.
i'- — •!.•
'^i=^j
%••. ^ ?:.
-*==-:^
e.o'— • &^=%
y,~ ==*,-*
x = >i
< ^ >' -
ii.' V s== ?*^
"••, #nK
' '*•— iV^4'i
MO'- ^''-J^™-^'
-«' 10 PVC €«•<•«
X *
00
OO
-10
o
*••
•••
c
o
o
u
o
o
U4
O
«
a.
-------
Job: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/12/32
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL CQLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-18 Permit No. 60799
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb
County NATRONA .... , . .. State . WYOMING . — -
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller MORRIS QRMOND AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log _____ Water Cnem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, BLOW COUNTS
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5087 Total Depth 14.0' Depth of First Water 7.0'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth _~~~
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 12.8 ft. Material PVC
ii ii ii ii ——_—— „ (l _____
Perforations: Type of perforator used '
Size of perforation inches by Incnes"
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No ___^___
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .080" set from
2.8 ft. to 11.8 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack 8-16 FRAC SILICA SAND
Packers 8ENTONITE
Type: Cement X;.rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS
Depths of Bases 1.0'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1 =
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 14.0
" to depth of '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE 8
C
£
><
k.
o
a
a
-------
ooo: 182
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/14/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form HENRY R. RICHTER
Well Name or Number SS-18a Permit No. 60799
Well Location T33M-R78W-6bb
County NATRONA .__. State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co; '- - NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller SILL NEFF, JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of"Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test X (BAILER TEST)
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, BLOW COUNT
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5088 Total Depth 14 FT Depth of First Water 6
Depth of Artesian Zone Mnal Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule .(If more than. one-xas ing.. per- hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2" ID diara. from 0 ft. to 13 '6* ft. Material PVC
~" — —•— •
M M — —•— • H a
Perforations: Type of perforator used ^
Size of oerforaticrn' ~ ' inches by incnes
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No ,-,-•«.
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .020" set from 3'2" ft. to 13'2 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack . 8-IS AND 12-20 SILICA SAND
Packers , .
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases 2
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1.5
Method of "Placing: Dropped '"X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 14.0
" to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BORgHQt F SS-19
a,
o
_c
«
or
PAGE.
1
.OF.
LOC-
GHOUNO
TOTAL
BOREHC
wiRf« T. 33N.-R.78 W.
6bb
FI PV -*5O87
PIP-PTH 18'
11 P niAU 9"
OEFTH
0-0.5
0.5-2.0
2JO-2.5
2.5-5.0
5.0-7.5
' Z5HO.O
10.0H2J5
12^-15.0
isjo-rrs
I7.5H3.C
MATCJUAC
Silt a Sand
Sand a Silt
Sand
Sand
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Grave
Sand a Grove
Sand a Grove
Sand a Grave
Sand a Grave
-
nmiiFR Northern Testing START P1NISH
Laboratories ...
Billings, Montana T,UP 0730 1000
sir. Hollow Stem Augor GFOPHYS '.0«
arrrs) — YES * N<
Ptuin
OE3CXIPTIOM AHO COMMENTS
Silt and fine
sand, same fine black "coke dust", light brown to brownish grsen
Fine sand and silt, some clay, well sorted, round sand, black stain to
sand ,hydrocarbon odor. Gay .lenses are clean.
FTne to medium sand, salt and pepper appearance , hydrocarbon odor.
Fine to medium sand , salt and pepper appearance, sheen on sand grains,
moist, green hydrocarbon product, strong hydrocarbon odor.
Coarte sand
oily coating
and gravel, no silt. yellowish-grten hydrocarbon product,
on grains , strong hydrocarbon odor.
Same as 3*0 to Z3*.
Same as 7.3 to 10.0*
Same as 10.0 to 12.2*
Same as 12.3 to 17.5*
Coarse sand and gravel , greenish-yellow product , moderate to light
viscosity product, very strong distillate odor (not gas, not oil sometiv'---
In-between ).
S«rf«««\
w
3.0'r-
4.0 —
r.e'—
IT.«*—
te.o'—
•^ 41/2* 0.0. 8U«fc St««l S«ti»*<»l« 4O
i
i
?."'
1
S*r
A-?:
*^f *
^^ — Z* 10 ?VC C««U«
W~ «-T
1" '
^^-e«..i f..k, e-ie. f,,.-suu. s«4
= i^g — C«*
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/14/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form HENRY R. RICHTER
Well Name or Number SS-19 Permit No. 60800
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb
County NATRONA . State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co. «.~. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF, JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WE'LL HISTORY. AND BLOW COUNTS
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5087 Total Depth 18 FT Depth of First Water 7
Depth of Artesian Zone _ Final Water Depth
Well Completion L , . . ,
Casing schedule (If-wore than.one casing per hole-give number (_
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 17'6" ft. Material PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used _ .
Size of perforation inches by inches
Number of perforations and deptns
perforations from ft. to ft.
• u «MI»*MMMMB» - —mm*^m*i~— .
Was screen installed: Yes- X No ,-,,<-, **
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .020" set from 7'6* ft. to 17'S ft.
„ ———— „ „ ———— • - »
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack. 12-20 SILICA SAND
Type:" Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) BEKTONITE
Depths of Bases 3 FT"'• * FT
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Watar/Sx) 1 GAL/SACX
No. Sacxs 2
Method of Placing:Dropped • X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 " to depth of 18_
" to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHQLP SS-20
PAGE
.OF.
o
o
LDCorC
TOTAL 1
BOREHC
•rvipn* T33N.-R.79W. nmn « Northern Testing „.„„,. eiuieu
lad
_., . -.„ , Laooraiorias - -•- - „ ->-- - --
eicv ~5095 8»lhnqs, Montana yTuF "30 1300
IFPTM 22* atfi Hollow Stam Auger r.fnPHY« f OT
i. F niAu 9" BITTS) — YES.2LN
FI uin
OCfTH
0-2.5
2.5-3.5
3.5-5.0
SjO-6.5
6.5-7.5
7.5-10.0
10.0-125
12^-15.0
15.0-17.5
I7.5-20JC
20.O22J5
225-25.C
UATgftlAl.
Sand a Silt
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Grove
Coy, Son d£k Go
Sand
Sand a Gravel
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand a Gravel
Sand a Gravel
acscxiPTtOM AMD COMMENTS
Silt and fine sand to 0.5* , vegetation root zone , clay lense from 1.5 't
2.1 ', clay is gray with black hydrocarbon stains, hydrocarbon odor
throughout sample , sand.
Coarse gravels and sand, minor fine pebbles , gravels up to 3 tn diamet«r,
sand is well sort»d, medium grained , minor iilf,dar* brown.
Clay, black hydrocarbon stains, gasoline odor, very plastic, moist , gray.
Clay, black hydrocarbon stains, gasoline odor, gray.
Coarse gravel and sand, grovel to 4M in diameter , no silt, medium sand,
well sorted, round, dark brown.
Medium sand, well sorted, subround to round , grades downward to coarse
sand, minor coarse gravel , no silt, minor fine pebbles, strong gasoline odor,
moist cutting, yellowish-green sheen on grains, dark gray.
Medium sand, well sorted to 12.0* , from 12.0 to 12.5 coarse to medium
sand, minor fin* pebbles and coarse gravels , gravel up to 2 tn diameter.
poorty sorted, no silt, dark brown to gray.
Medium to coarse iand,no silt, poorly sorted, subround to round, wet
14.5 r, strong, ga»oli/ie odor , yells wish -gra«n product , ihesn on cuttings.
blue-gray to gray.
Same as 12.5 to 15.0*.
Same as 15.0 to 17.5*.
Coarse sand and gravel , gravel up to 3" in diameter, very poorly sorted,
lubround to iabangular.no silt, gasoline odor, slight sheen to cuttings,
greenish-blue.
Coarse sand and fine pebbles, minor coarse gravel, no silt to 24.0* ,
clayey to cloy lenses 24.0 to 25.0 , slight gasoline odor , minor sheen
on cuttings, gray to dark greenish- blue-.
s«r«"«*^\ r*' rT""*"'° ^ve c**4**
r?3 P5iDrui c"*
-------
SOREH01 _g SS-21
o
c
6
0
c
o *"
• — •«
w C
e —
<
.5^
r*«
7:
.-«•
"*5" ^
.
=
I
S
t""*
gray discoloration, strong hydrocarbon
1
\sj
**•
•5
— '
£
V:
'.'•
•y
— *,
Sc..^ ^
•
-o™,t P«»,
—~ St«H«4-C<(ti
Wr«ppJ(t v
f
•«» S*«l
tut*
S-<« Pr««-StlUe J««<
wt_»^SIa4i»4«** Jt««l S«r*«n
-------
C WCLL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/14/82
Name of Individual Computing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-22 Permit No. 60803
Well Location T33N-R79W-lac
County NATRONA - State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller MORRIS ORMOND AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY. BLQtt COUNTS ]ZHH
Suirmary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5099 Total Depth 32.5' Depth of First Water22.5'
Depth of Artesian £one __ Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
SCHEDULE 40
4*"00 dim. from 0 ft. to 29.5 ft. Material GALVANIZED STEEL
Perforations: Type of perforator..used TORCH •
- Size Of perforation .25 Inches by 3 Inches
Number of perforations ana deptns
160 perforations from 19.2 ft. to 29.2 ft. •
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Oiameterr 4j*QD Slot size .100* set rrom 19.2 ft. to 29.2 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of paclc 8-1S FRAC SILICA SAND
Packers BENTONITE
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS
Depths- of Bases 1.0' 4.Q'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Watar/Sx) 1 GAL/SACX
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: dropped '• X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 32.5
* to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BQRgHQt g SS-22
PAGE _J OF __V
o
O
o:
o
o
a
r-.-=
53
LOC.or(
GROUND
TOTAL
BORCHC
mouns T. 33N.-R.79W. nmt t PR Northern
Testing • sna-r ei^r^u
lao ,-i -- Laboratories T.,4.g2 r M"g-,
PTPV -5099 Billings, Montana TmcQ:30om 3.-oo om
DPPTH 32.5 S!G Hollow Stam Auger CFOPMYC i nr.
ii f niA»i 9 BIT'S)
mum —
OtfTM
0-1.0
1.0-1.5-
1.5-3.0
3,0 5.5
5.5-7.0
75-8.C
8.0-9.0
9.0-io.s
10.5H2.C
I2J5H4.0
14.0-17.5
IZ5-178
IZ8-3Z5
UATCKIAL
Sand & Grave
Sandy Silt
Sandy Si it
Sandy Silt
Sand
Sandy Slit
Sand Bt Grave
Sand ft Gravel
Sand & Gravei
Sand
Sand w/Clay
Sandstone
Siity Sand-
stone-
oeacxtmoM AMD
Y£S X NO
COMMENTS
Brown, siity, fine to coarse grained sand with scattered pebbles up to 1/8"
In diameter.
Brown, sandy silt with some minor
organic debris.
Dark brown, sandy silt. Sand consists of quartz grains of fine to
medium grain size, well to subrounded.
Similar to 1.5-3,0 sample with Increasing clay content.
Brown to rusty brown, eiity, quartzitic , well to subrounded, very tine td
medium grained sand.
Brown to -rusty -brown , sandy silt.
Clean, light brown, subrounded to subangular quartzitic, fine to vary
coarse grained sand and gravel with pebbles up to 1/4 in diameter.
dean, off -whit* to light brown, subangular to subrounded, quartzitic, fine
to very coarse ignd and gravel with pebbles up to l" In diameter.
Same as 3.0 - 10.2 '.
Olive -brawn to dark brown , subroundsd, siity fine to coarse sand win
scaftsrsd pabblai up to 1/16 " in diameter. Primarily very fine to fins
sand with some very herd clumps of fina sand and acattarsd pods of
brown clay.
Same as 12.5-14.0* with pebbles increasing in size up fo I "in diameter
and increasing occurrence of ciay pods.
Silver-gray , dry, well consolidated,
sandstone.
quart title, very fine- to fine gtafried
Silver -gray, consolidated , quartritlc, well rounded, very fin* to fine siity
sandstone. Samples become saturated, at 22.3*.
S»rfee«>^ I.A* P^
w^|
4*~ 1
££ L
£•
**
1
$
***
~
«r
£
£
c
£
3t«»l CfftU*
*^ C««Knt S«rf««» S««i
S*"1*""* "IU*1
"^.%MJ'&M7"* """"
—
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/14/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form HENRY R. RICHTER
Well Name or Number SS-23 Permit No. 60804
Well Location T33N-R79W-laa _^^^
County NATRONA .
State WYOMING
Name of DrvliiTTj Co.
Name of Driller BILL NEFF, JEFF HUCK
NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Owner of Wei 1 TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach-copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem.
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Pump Test X (BAILER TEST
Sunmary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5096 Total Depth 23' Depth of First Water 15'
Depth of Artasian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diara. from
ft. to 21 ft. Material
* * ^~~~~ » tt
PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used ______
Size of perforation' ' inches by
incnes
Number of perforations ana aeptns
perforations from ft. to
ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2" Slot size .020"
• —————— w n ......
Was well gravel packed: Yes X
Type of pact 12-20 SILICA SAMO
set from 11
No
ft. to 21 ft
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
X ; rubber shale
; other (desc.) BENTONITE
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SAOC
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing:Dropped • X
Bit or Reamer Size
Pumped
to depth of
to depth of
23
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHQIP SS-25
PAGE
1
.OF_
1..
c
E
o
5
W
a
a.
«•
a
O w
*— c
0 U
•££
CCS
i*
X «
00
Oo
-10
o
o
"c
0
2
o
u a
o e
£1
a —
<5|l
0
tu
a
(C*C-o^cooRDa"^,33. N - R.79 W.
GROUNC
TOTAL
BOREHC
• laa . - - ••'-••• ••
» PIPV —5096
DEPTH 23'
3L£ DIAM. 9 "
oerrx
6-25
2.5-5.0
5.0-7.5
7.5-JO.C
IO.OHZ5
I25H5.0
15.0-17,5
J7.5-2QC
20JO-2L5
MATERIAL.
Sand
Sand o\ Grove
Sand
Sand fi Pebble
Sand & Pebbles.
Sand a Psbblesi
Sand a Pebbles
Sand & Pebbles
^
-
oain FB Northern Testing
Laboratories
Billings, Mon
RIG Hollow Stem
sms) —
Ft inn —
••
•»
tana
Auger
START FINISH
T1UF 1315 1500
GEOPHYS LOG
...„. YFS X.NC
ocacxipTioN AMD COMMENTS
Fine, to medium sand, mod.erate sorting, subround to round, minor fine
pebbles (OJ5-I.5) , slightly silty to 0.5 feet, clean below 0.2 (tet, moist
at 2. feet , sheen on cuttings, gasoline odor.
Medium sand and fine pebbles to coarse gravel , gravel up to 3W In diameter
slightly silty, sand is well sorted, subround, wet, gatollne odor.
brilliant blue-green- sheen on cuttings, strong gasoline odor , (3.0-3.3)
fine gray sand , well sorted, subround , greenish-brown to dark brown.
Coarse to medium sand, clean, no siit , moderate sorting, subround to round,
wet to moist, gasoline odor, sheen oa cuttings, yellowish -green hydocarbon
product , brownish -green to dark green.
Medium sand and fin* pebbles, minor coarse gravels, clean, no siit,
strong gasoline odor, sheen on grains , yellowish-green hydrocarbon product
moderate sorting, brown to brownish -green.
Medium sand and fine pebbles, minor coarse gravel, gravel up to 5* In
diameter, poorly to moderate sorting ,subangular to subround , clean ,
no silt, Strong gasoline odor, sheen to grains , greenish-yellow product,
greenish -gray.
Same as 10.
0 to 12.5'.
Coarse 'to madiutt land and fine pebbles, minor coarse gravtl* up to 1.:
In diametar , modsrats sorting , round to suoround , wet , gasoline odor,
Sheen to grains, gray to graying -green.
Coarse to medium sand and fine pebbles.no gravel
subround , dean , no siit, green to brownish-green ,s
Coarse to medium sand,
dark green.
. poorly sorted ,
tight gasoline odor.
silt to clayey, no gasoline odor , green to
_,** 2* (0 PVC C«*
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA • Date: 7/L4/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form HENRY R. RICHTER
Well Name or Number SS-24- Permit No. 608Q5
Well Location T33N-R79W~laa
County NATRONA State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN- TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller SILL NEFF. JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type) ____^
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test X (SAILER TEST
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY ZZIZI HHHI
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5091 Total Depth 22' Depth of First Water 15'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than-one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID dian. from 0 ft. to 19'6" ft. Material PVC
—__—. M „ - a a -~——~~ • M —^—
Perforations: Type of perforator used
i^c of perforation ,",'"" "''nchas *J incnes
Number of perforations and deptns
perforations from ft. to
ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size TOTS set from 9'6" ft. to 19'6" ft.
M • » II
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack- 12-20 SILICA SAND
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) BEHTONITH
Depths of Bases 2' 6'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1.5
Method of Placing: dropped - X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
to depth of 22
" to depth of
-------
BQREHQt _P SS-25
LOG OF BOREHOLE
o
c
£
c
w
0
d
M
0 *
• "™
^, ^
i_ C
0 «
"^ c
or^
S 0
H2
oS
_i
0
c
0
"c
o
o
0 0
0 £
X — •
0
a •
0
UJ
o
a.
LDCor<
GROUNC
• TOTAL
BOREHC
-rv^n
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/15/82
Name of .Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE '
Well Name or Number SS-26 Permit No. 60807
Well Location T33N-R79W-laa
County NATRONA State WYOMING
Name of Ori 11 ing- Cor.- NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller SILL NEFF AND JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log ___r____ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5092 Total Depth 22.5' Depth of First Water 15.5'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth -
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( }
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diara, from 0 ft. to 21.5 ft. Material PVC
H 14 II II ~-~~~~ It
Perforations: Type of perforator used ,
Size of-perforation ' ":' incnes by incr.es
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2" ID Slot size .018" set from 11.8 ft. to 20.8 ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack- 8-16 FRAC SILICA SAND
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases 3.0
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACX
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Dropped • X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 • * to depth of 22.5
" to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOftgHQLg SS-2S
PACE 1 QF-J-
o
' c
£
0
£
V.
0
o.
a 0
v. C
o o
*»O
C
ss
o £
X O
0 =
HO
Oo
-JO
J
o
o
o
2
o
o o
a c
K —
O —
o5
j_
o
Ul
o
e
LOC.or<
™pns T. 33 N.-R.79W.
• loa - - • • •
^onwn PI FV- 5092
TOTAL
80REHC
f+n c
HPPTH 22.5
a "
5LP niAU 3
DEPTH
0-2.5
2.5-5.0
5.0-7.5
7.5-II.-0
U.O-l2J5i
12^-JSC
15.0 HIS
UATEKIAU
Silt a Gravel
to Silty day
Sllty Clay
Silty Sand
Sand w/Clay
Sand & Grave
Sand & Gravel
Sand & Gravel
17.5-213 Sand' 3 Gravel
nan i PR Northern
Testing
Laboratories,
Billings , Montana
BIS Hollow Stsm
BJTfSl
Aug»r
START FINISH '
OATT 7H5~82 """T-15-32
TIMPlO:45am 11:30 am
CEOPHYS LOG
YPS X,wo
OE3CX1PTIOM ANO COMMENTS
Dark brown silt and gravel, at surf ace, changing to a dark gray to black silty
ciay with minor organic content and odor of hydrocarbons.
i
Dark gray to black, silty organic ciay with minor fine to medium,
subrounded quartz sand and strong odor of hydrocarbons.
1
Slight greea-gray, subrotindsd, silty , very fine to fine grained sand with
strong hydrocarbon odor and some moisture. Minor pods of dark gray ciay
also present.
Green tinted
grained sand
with strong
, gray , subrounded, quartzitic, siliy , very fine to coarse
with pods of dark gray to brown ciay, hydrocarbon moistened
hydrocarbon odor.
Dark gray to black, stibroanded to subangularTquartziHc , very fine to
. coarse grained sand and gravel with pebbles up to 2" In diameter.
Moist with strong hydrocarbon odor.
Same as tl.O
to 12.5 with increasing silt content.
Same as 12.5 to 15.0 Encountered hydrocarbon saturated material at 15.5*.
• Same as" 12.5 *ro 15.0' Hydrocarbon saturated. - - . ••
.
arm* T.
j
;
1 !.•'•— i
'*" ^
>
"t
21* 5*^
^
Z2.V— t
-^ +I/2* 0.8. 3l««k SI««l,.S<»«d«l« 4O
jr^ i»r«t««t»r MM
u &^ q$
f \tf* ^'^
} V, C««««t S«rf««» $••!
\ Jit "~~t>«'lll Co«tl«««
^ 7C
i ».
; -~? ~—
-------
*.vji'ifLc.i xurt u/Mrt Udce: • //lo/82
Name of Individual Completing This Fora MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-27 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R79W-laa
County NATRQNA State WYOMING
Name.of Drilling Co. • NORTHERN- TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY """"""""
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5093 Total Depth 22.5' Depth of First Water 15.0'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 20.0 ft. Material PVC
M • a a a u
Perforations: Type of perforator used ^
Size of perforation " Inches by " ' "incnes
Number of perforations and aeptns
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .018" set from 10.3 ft. to 19.3 ft.
-
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack. 8-16 FRAC SILICA SAND
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases 1.5'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Cropped - X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
• to depth of 22.5
~" to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BQRgHQLP SS-27
PAG£_L_OF_1
o
o
y^-~«™n« T. 33 N. - R. 79 W. „»« i « Northern Testing ... eT»OT e,uieu
GROUND
TOTAL
BORCHC
. laa - - . Laboratories
•etpv— 5093 Billings, Montana
QATP 7-15 -82-- 7-15-32
iriuc- 5^5 om S:3n nm
IPPTH 22.5 pirt Hollow Stem Augsr fijrnpwYs i nc
ii e ni AM 9 " anrtsl — —
Pttnn
,,__YFS X MO
OtPTH
0-2.5
2.5-5.0
5.0-7.5
7.5-JOJC
IO.OH5.C
I5.0H7.5
17.5-225
MATERIAL
Sand a Grove
M/ Clay
Sand a Grovel
w/ Clay
Sand
Sand a Grave
Sand a Grovel
Sand a Grovel
Sand -a Gravel
OeSCMIPTION AMD COMMENTS
Brown , subrounded to subanguiar,quartzitie, sllty, Mne to coarse grained
sand and gravel with pebbles up to 1/4* In diameter and I* diameter clumps
of brown clay.
Clean, light bcown,. subrounded to subangular, quartzitlc; ftn* to coarse
grained sand with seatt*rsd gravel pebbtss up to "in diameter, and
muior clumps of brown clay.
Cltan, light brown, mbrounded to subangular, quartsltlc, fine to coarse
grained sand, moist with no detectable hydrocarbon odor.
Same as 5.0 to 7.5 with Increased moisture content and gravel pebbles
up to 1 in diameter.
Same ae 7.5 to 10.0 with color cnange
with strong hydrocarbon odor.
to dark gray at U.O1 very wet
Dark gray , subrounded -to subangular, quartzitlc medium to very coarse
sand and gravel with pebbles up to 1 In diameter , saturated with
hydrocarbons.
Dark grey , lubrounded to subanqufar,
with pebbles up.. to 1/4" in diametar ,
r/,":.^ «• w
•' ''*" |
•V .
10.3'— K =
.. v'; S
"A —
^1
'I'-
ll.*'— C =
io.o1- ^L.
tZ 5*— ^Tt
quartzlfic caarsa sand and (jrsv/-!
saturatad with hydrocarbons.
,~4VZ* O.O. SUck St»«l, S«*«4»(. 4O
" . r- Z* 10 »»VC C4«toe
R
= *"i
if
il
sJ^"" *** .
= Y>
1
oo
o
o
o
a.
••
a
o
Ul
o
flC
a.
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Data: 7/15/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL CQLLENTINE
Well Name or Number S5-28 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R79W-laa
County NATRONA • • State WYOMING
Name of Drill ih-j-Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5095.5 Total Depth 27.5' Depth of First Water 16.4'
Depth of Artesian Zone __ Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 24.0 ft. Material PVC
• H « ~—~~~~ » * ~ " » »
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation ' _ ir.cnes by
Number of perforations and aep^ns
perforations from _ ft. to _ ft.
* .. ... ^^^*^^m*^~ .. ,_ — ..
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .018" set rrora 14.3 ft. to 23.3 ft,
—————- „ „ ———-— It H MM "
Was well gravel packed: Yes No
Type of padc
Packers1 .
Type: Cement X- ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases 1.0'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Watar/Sx) 1 GAL/SACX
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing:Dropped ' X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 27.5
' ** to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOHEHQLg SS -28
PAGE
t
.OF.
0
c
£
o
0
a.
«•
o a
«c
i- C
« «
cc
•N- O
•> a
e
8.S
a *z
X 0
• o
»-{-=
• §s
00
Oo
-IO
_1
o
jc
o
"c
a
o
o o
a c
X —
«l —
•
si
O
tu
o
a.
LDCof <
-rvvjrv? T. 33 N.-R.79W. noii r P» Northern Testing START PINISI
•- Iflfl- - Laboratory*
c»rv,Nn P. PV -5095.5 Bill «ngs . Montana ™*.rtn--. «,««.-.
TOTAL
BOREH(
nepTM. 27.5 BJG Hollow Stem Auqar ,,PnpHY<. , 0^
)t.traiAu. 9" nmsi YES X NO
pujin
OCfTH
0-2.5
2.5-7.5
7.5-15.
15.0-27.5
UATCXIAl.
Sand and
Oravel
Sand and
Gravel "
Sand and
Sand and
Gravel
oesexirTioN AMD COUMCMTS
Brown, subroundad to. •ubongulijr , quartzitle, fin* Jo coarse grained sand
and gravel with pebWes up to 1 In diameter.
Brown, subrounded to.subanqular, jiuartzitic, fine to coarse groined sand
and gravel with pebbles up to 3 "in diameter.
Dark greenish gray, subroundsd to (ubanqular^quartzJtiCt.ftne to caarsa
grained sand and gravel with pebbles up to 3" in diameter, very mois-t
with itrong odor oi hydrocarbons.
Saturated at about t€.0',dark gray to black discolored, subroundad to
subongulor, quartzitle, fine to coarse grained land and gravei with pebbias
up to 3 "in diameter and strong odor of hydrocarbons.
^^-41/2' 0.0. ai««k Jl««l. 3«k«4••••••
^HWBKBV
•KHHMi^
•^•^H^
^••^•^
(^•••••^
MBMMM
•MIBII^B
••••IM^
' "i. ;
^.— 2" 10 PVC C«il««
1
W
i
^
^
— i
**^
— Drill C»«l«e» -C*««»««4 s««* «4
ar«*«i
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION UAiA uace: _//ia/o_
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-29 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R79W-lad
County NATRONA • • State WYOMING
Name of Dri 11 f ng' Co.' "" NORTHERN'TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach 'copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5090 Total Depth 22.5' Depth of First Water 10.5*
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from Q ft. to 16.7 ft. Material PVC
MM MM H It
Perforations: Type of perforator .used
Si 22 of oarforation "inches ov
Number of perforations anc aaptns
ov incnes
perforations from ft. to ft.
________ _________
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .018" set from _7.0. ft. to 16.0 ft.
II II ~ M
Was well gravel packed: Yes
type of pack 8016 FRAC SILICA SAND
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.)
Depths of Bases 3.Q1
Ceroent surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Cropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 22.5
" to depth of
-------
PROJECTJifi
Monitoring
LOCATIOM T>xoco Rdf Inary. Coipar. Wyoming
OOQED BY Michael coticntlnt
O
b
1
§
b £
N on
01 b
£
«
c/>
ift
o
•2.
** P>~ O>
3
< W 3^ O
»< o
O.M
>
•°c
'0
or
5"
n
~ 0-.
«-
i
•
w
8
If
A
»5
a.£.
1<
J* **
" *^ "^
a.*
^& 2
s|^ s
e5 o
si
n
M
•»
<
—' "
o
n
3
S-n
-* A.
o "*
o
*»o
o
(X
tn
3
n.
CFT
S3
£§
m ro
U)
«?
3
f>
H
01
z
i
CO 31
O M
00
O
31
E
a
e
OHO
Sz^i
X
M
O
8
M
m
V)
|x
2
O
8
i
i
N
o
Q
ru
o
33
m
x
o
r
m
CO
o
•»
n
o
r
O
•n
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 7/16/82
•Name of Individual Completing This Form HENRY R. RICHTER
Well Name or Number SS-30 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb
County NATRONA State WYOMING
Name of Drilling-Co.. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller TERRY TAUCINGTOM. JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, SLOW COUNT ZZZ
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5088 Total Depth 15'1* Depth of First Water 5'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Watar Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
•
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 15'1" ft. Material PVC
X • ^^^^^^ II '» ^^^^^ « II
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation Incnes by Incnes
Number of perforations ana aaptns
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .018" set from 5T ft. to IS'l" ft.
~~"~~"~^ ——^—
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack. 8-16 SILICA SAND
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) BENTONITE
Depths of Bases 3 FT * r'T
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing:Dropped • X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 " to depth of 15_
" to depth of
-------
PROJECT g.Q*P*L I.??000 Monitoring
. Will.
•
t.ncATin^i-Tfxoco Rdfjnaf y. Caipar. Wyoming
LOGGED BY JfcnrVV OflcHlVf ,-
01
•0
o
'0
,
0
en
j_
O
Ja_
pi
o
i
ro
In
o o
bi i
Oi
2.
o
a
2.J13C 2.2.0 o o
0 ft ^ r\ *— I*T tl* ^
"23
»
its
— o-
iz o
o
H
'
»I!
o"1-
"
8
3*3 3 &
ii
1
:*°*
IN
£•* ^
.^2
cr-*f^
3T O
*•»«
00- O
3 "* O.
O. O Q
A «^
if 2
* * w
cr-
3 ^"0-
»•
O o
a
o
3
CJT
§ as
m
o
2
O
m
&
CO
E 5 5
O £>
03
brq
•u m m
x
o
a
X
z
o
en
O
Q
oo
o
;o
m
n:
o
r"
m
CD
O
3)
m
o
•o m
^
n
m 0)
I
w
o °
•n
-------
BASIC WtLL CUMHlttiUN GAiA UaCe: //io/a,
Name of Individual Completing This Form HENRY R. RICHTER
Well Name or Number SS-32 Permit No. ^
Well Location T33N-R79W-lac ^^
County NATRONA State WYOMING
Name of Drilling -Co-. • NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller TERRY TALKINGTON, JEFF HUCK
Name of Owner of Wei 1 TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach-copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log ________ Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5088 Total Depth 24 Depth of First Water 17_
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2" ID dianu from 0 ft. to
"""~ « « ~""~~~™~ it n
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation"
Number of perforations ana daptns
perforations from
23 ft.
....... .. |(
' ™" ~™ n
inches by
ft. to
Material PVC
i ncnes
ft.
"~~~~"~~ u
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size ItSTa" set from 13 ft. to 23 ft.
• M ———. ^ w ________ ^
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack 8-16 SILICA SAND
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) BENTONITE
Depths of Bases 3 FT 8 FT
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 24_
" to depth of
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BQRgHQI P SS-32
PAGE -1 C
o
o
LJOCor(
-nnpn* T. 33 N.-R.79W. „«» i PI. Northern Testing .. START P,NISH
. lac Laborator.es _ _
™««,Nn PI PV ~ 5088 Billings , Montana ^ t««« ,,«„
TOTAL
BOREHC
OPPTH -24 ff,G Hollow Stem Auger rrnpHY = -'
|ll -««•«•« •/.«•• «•« <"••«•«.
•Ml
23.0'— ^^
CCJQ;
00
Oo
-to
o
"c.
o
o
u
a
a
u
o
tu
o
or
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 6/26/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-33 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb
County NATRONA State WYOMING
Name of Drilling- -Go.- _- NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller SILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary,, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach-copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, BLOW COUNT
Suinmary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5084 Total Depth 14.5' Depth of First Water 5.0
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion .
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( _ }
and attach extra sheets)
2" dlam. from 0 ft, to 12.5 ft. Material PVC
M
Perforations: Type of perforator used . „, ,—
Size of perforation " ' 1 ncnes fay ____^_ incnes
Muir&er of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
~ .- !• ^mm^mmI^BMBM ^ „ - - - - »
Was screen installed: Yes X No „«.-.*
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .OZQ" set rrotn 2.5 ft. to
» M
Was well gravel packed: Yes Mo X_
Type of pack
Packers BENTONITE
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS
Depths of Bases 1.0' 2<0—
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 6AL/SACX
No. Sacks 1 „ n
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped _
Bit or Reamer Size
9 " to depth of 13.5 '
1.5" to depth of 14.5
-------
LOG OF .BOREHOLE
BORgHOLF SS-33
PAGE
.OF.
LOCor COORDS, T. 53 N. - R.7B W.
6bb
Ftfry -SO84
TOTAL QgPTH >4-5n
BOREHOLE "'*" 9
DR»t Fa Northern Testing
— Labor atorios
Billings, Montana
git; Hollow Stem Auqar
aiT(S)
PI inn
START
FINISH
DATpS-zs-ez. ..s-zs-ag..
TlUg 8'00om 12'COom
.YES.X.NO
OCPTM
UATEXIAL
OCSCXtPTIOM ji'NO COUUCNTX
OO
OO
o
IU
o
a.
o-i:5
1.5-3.0
2.5-4.0
4.0-5.5
5J-7.0
7.0-8.0J
8.0-10.5
I0.5H4.5
Dirt, Sand
and Gravel
Black Sand
and Gravel
Clay to Sam
ana Gravel
Sand and
Gravel
P*bb|y .
Conglomerat
Pebbly
Shale
Shale
Rusty brown fine to coarse grained sand with some.pebbles.Oily small to
sediments.
Black fine to coarse grained sand -ond gravel with oily smell
Brown clay to rusty brown sand and gravel. Very moist and smell of oil.
Dark brown, oil saturated sand and gravel with some pebbles up to l" in
dlamtttr.
Black,oil saturated pebbly conglomerate
Black, oil saturated pebbly conglomerate
Dry, black shale
Dry, black shale
T
•« C/Z* O.O. S«lv««ll»d 3c*«4«l» 40
'"
p»u»«t
Drill C»tttn«« — C»U«p»«4 3«»4
••4
C*i
-------
i ion u/Mrt uace:
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL CQLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-34 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R7SW-6fab
County NATRQfIA State WYOMING
Name of Or vW in?-Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, BLOW COUNT ,
Suimury Leg: (faet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5084 Total Depth 25.1 Depth of First Water 6.5
Depth of Artssian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diara. from 0 ft. to 14.4 ft. Material PVC
~™"-™"~~™~"~' u » """~™~~™"""' n M ~™~~""•"• u H ~""™~~~"—•—
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation •-•••- " --i.ncr.as ty incnes
Number of perforations and cepsns
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2MID Slot size .080" set from 4.4 ft. to 14.4 ft.
a it H n u ii
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack- 12-20 FRAC ANO 8-16 FRAC SILICA SAND
(2 bags)(1 bag)
Packers 8ENTONITE
Type: Cament X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS (1.25 bucke
Depths of Bases 1.5' 4.0' ""
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACX
No. Sacks I
Method of Placing:Cropped • X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 24.6
U to depth of 25.1 '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BORgHQt P SS-34
PAGE _L_OF.
T.33 N.-R.78W.
6bb
GROUND
TOTAL
— 5084
25.
BOREHOLE OIAU. 9 to 24 6
1.5" to 25.1'
npu t FR Northern Tasting
Laboratories
Billings,'Montana
sic Hollow Stem Augar
BITfSl
FT t»n
START
FINISH
5-'3Q om
GEOPHYS LOG
UATCXIAU
OtlCKtPTIOM AMD COUMEXTI
iS
00
JO
o
"c
o
0-3.5
3.5-5,0
5.0-23.
23.7-24
2^0-25.
Sand 8k Gravt
SUty Sand
Sand & Srov«
Shale •
Coal
.3*
o
Ul
o
flC
a.
Oily smelling fine to coarse grained sand and gravel.
Gray-green, odlferous silty sand.
Stack, strongly odJ/erous,hydrocarbon stained fine to coarse sand
and gravel.
Very tight, brown shale, carbonaceous.
Highly fractured black coal:
4 1/2 * OJO.
Sr«v«l P«€i, II-10 Frac-2!tlca Saxd
4O
ZS.I'-
3»ll» 3f«*« 3»?Ur 8«e(n« '
-------
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTIME
Well Name or Number' SS-35 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb
County NATRQNA State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co. • NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTQN
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig- (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available^(attach -copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, BLOW COUNTS ^^
Suimiary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5086 Total Depth 30.0 Depth of First Water 5.5
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diara. from 0 ft. to 13.9 ft. Material PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation • • " inches by incnis"
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .080" set from 3.6 ft. to 13.2 ft.
n ' ~~~~~~~~~' u n ^~-—-~—' u • ~"^—— „ „ ———^ a
Was well gravel packed! Yes X No
Type of pack 12-20 FRAC SILICA SAND (3 bags)
Packers 8EMTONITE
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS (1 bucket]
Depths of Bases 1.0' 2.5'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 29.5
U to depth of 30.Q
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE.
SS-35
a
O
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 6/27/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL CQLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-36 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R79W-laa
County NATRQNA ' State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co. NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Wei 1 TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool., rotary, etc.) HOLLOW 5TEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log ______ Water Chem. Pump test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, BLOW COUNTS
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5085 Total Depth 33.5' Depth of First Water 8.0'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Hater Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give nuirber (_
and attach extra sheets)
2" ID diam. from 0 ft. to
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from
Was screen installed: Yes X No
15.1 ft. Material
""""""""" W II
it a
incnes oy
ft. to ft
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .080" set from 4.8 ft.
Was well gravel 'packed: Yes X
Type of pack 12-ZO FRAC SILICA SAND
Packers
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale
Depths of Bases 1.0'
No
(3 bags)
; other (desc. )
PVC
incnes
to 14.4 ft.
« " " '" " u
BENTONITE
PELLETS (2 bt
3.5'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing: Cropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 " to depth of 33.0'
U * to depth of 33.5' '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
SS - 36
PAGE
OF_
o
c
'e
o
a
a
LOC-orC
GROUND
TOTAL 1
BOREHC
I.
^npn« T33N.-R.79W. nR11 , „ Northern Testing CTAPT C1U(CU
lea Laooraror.es 6_27_92 s.27-82
FtFV~5085 Billings, Montana yiuFiuooam 3'00om
IJTPTH 33.5 s.r. Hollow Stem Auger RPOPHYS i n«
iifniAU 9 "to 33.0' ams) YES X NC
5 to 33.5 Pt inn ——
DEPTH
0-4.0
4.0-5.0
5.0-8.6
8.0-32.8
3Z3-325
MATERIAL
Silt
Sand and
Gravel
Silt
Sand and
Grav«l
snai«
OC3CKIPT10N AND COMMCNTS
Light brown silt.
Slack fine to coarse land and grav«l.
Brown silt.
Black fin« to coari« sand and gravel with pebbles
Dry , brown ihale.
.* 4 1/2" OA aiaek St««l Sen«dul« 4O
S*^ Prottctar Plp«
v
V*-A i, A T \ — . /-^ii-r— ^ ]a«4 aad Ornv.!
x V\ " x \ - '
\5^V-W\Ci
v,^/u;-
N U ' V ' ^X*
-------
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 5/27/82
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL CQLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-37 Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R79W-laa ^^
County NATRONA . State WYOMING
Name of Ori11irig TToV ' ' NORTHERN TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller BILL NEFF AND TERRY TALXINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY, BLOW "CTiUNTS""
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5085 Total Depth 32.7' Depth of First Water 7.1'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 15.2 ft. Material PVC
——^—— » n ~~~—--~ it a -^—— n it ————•——
Perforations: .Type of perforator used ,_^^__________________
Size of perforation Inches ay Incr.i?
Number of perforations and depths
perforations from ' ft. to ft.
Was screen installed: Yes X No
Diameter: 2* ID Slot size .080" set from 4.9 ft. to 14.5 ft.
» "~"~"~~~~"^~~'~ » n ^~"~"~~~~~~' it n - it n -~~—~~~ it
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack 12-20 FRAC SILICA SAND (2 bags)
Packers BENTONITE
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS (2 bucket
Depths of Bases 1.0' 3.5' ."""
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACK
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Uropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
9 to depth of 2Z.S
I* to depth of 32.7 '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BQRgHQLg SS - 37
PAGE _J OF_1
a
O
T. 33 N. - R. 79 W.
Jog .. _ .
GROUND Pt-gV ~ 5O88
TOTAL OFPTH 32.7
BOREHOLE PIAU 9 to 323
1.5 to 32.7'
nRii i PR Northern Testing
Laborotories
Billings', Montana
Hollovr Stem Auger
aiT(s).
FLUID-
START FINISH
r>ATg-6-27--3Z .-J&--Z7.^a2
T1UF 3'00pm S'3Oom
X wn
OtfTM
MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION AMD COMMENTS
0-2.5
25-3L
31.4-325
325-32
Silt
Sand 2k Grava
Shalt
Dry , brown silt.
Gray sand and gravel with pabblas.oily odor.
Gray thai*
Sflfy jray fin* grain«d sond»ton«.
a:
o
00
Oo
-10
c.
o
a
CJ
o
UJ
41/2" OA •!««* Sl«*l*3«k*4«i* 4O
32.7'—
String
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
SS - 38
PAGE
.OF-
ifv-^rnnRn* T. 33 N.-R.78 W. nnn . PR Northern Testing
6bb Laboratories
^omiwn ct PV' NA ' " Billings, Montana
TnTAi nPPTH 10.5 RIG Hollow Stem Aug«r
Rn»»THm f OIAM ,9":.-: :."„ _ amsi —
PT um
OCPTM
0-1.5
1.5-3.0
2.5-4.0
4.0-5.5
5.5-7.0
7.0-9.8
9.8-10.5
MATERIAL
Sandy Sitfw/
Clay a Groval
Silt, Sand a
Graval
Organic CJoy
Sand and
Graval
Sand and
Graval
Sand and
Gravel
SUty Shalt
OC3CXIPTIOX AMD COWWCNTX
START FINIS
riA-pe 7-12-82 " 7-12-
TIUP 8:30 am 10:30
GEOPHYS LOG
Y^S X
Yellow -brown sandy lilt with ciay pods and icattersd gravals l/Z" in
dlamattr n«ar surfac*.
Tallow-brown to'beown tilt to (ln«.to caari* grained sand , subroundtd to
w«ll roundtd with sam« pods of ciay and »cattsr«d ijraval p«bbta* up to
1/4" in diomit«r.
Brown silty, organic, ciay with rutty splotch«s of iron stain and organic
dabrlc such ai small' twigs. Scatt«rtd caarst sand grains.
Clean, dry, waS round«d to subround«d fin* to coarsa sand and grav«l
with p«bb(«s up to 1/2" in diam«tar.
Ct«an,dry, subrpundad to wait roundad flnt to coorsa sand and gravel wit)
pabbia* up to l"ln diamatar. Hit oil saturated black sand and graval at 7
Black, oil saturatad, fin* to eoorsa^grainad sand
wall roundad to subroundad, up to l" in dlamatar.
Brown to gray carbonacaous silty shala,dry.
and grav«t with pabbia
•
o
c
1
o
o
CJ
cr
o
I-Q
Oo
-JO
a
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE? SS-39
PAGE _L_OF_L
LOG. orC
GROUND
TOTAL
80REHC
•noun* T.33N.-R.78W. npn . PP Northern Testing <;T4RT P|NISH
Sbb Laboratories OATF7.12_82 7.12.82
PIPV N.A. Billings , -Montana yiupiO:4dam 12:30 om
r,ppTH 12.8 Rir: Hollow Stem Auger GZOPHYS LOG
»Pn«Au- 9" to 12. 5' ems) . YES X NC
1.5" to 14.0' piMin
oerrH
0-1.5
.5-3.O
2-5-4.Q
8.0-5.S
5.5-6L5
6.5-7,0
75-9.0
' 9.e-ao
[I.OH4.C
MATERIAL
Sandy Silt
w/Clay
Sandy Silt
Organic Sandy
Silt
Organic Sandy
Silt
Sand & Gravel
Sand & Grave
Sand 3 Grove
Silty Shale
-
oeSCXIPTlOM AMD COMMENTS
• Yellow brown, dry , sandy silt with minor pods of gray clay and pebbles up
to l" In diameter.
No sample due to -caving.
Light brown, sandy silt with laminations of gray clay and brown , fine
grained sand.
Dark brown to yellow brown to dark gray sandy silt with twigs and organic
materials and slight odor of hydrocarbon.
Yellow brown to gray sandy silt with organic*.
Fine to coarse grained sand and gravel with black discoloration of
hydrocarbon saturation.
Black, fine to coarse grained sand and gravel saturated with tiydocarban.
Some as 7.5 -9,0 s .- .
Dry , dark brown , carbonaceous silty shale.
4 1/2*0.0. fU«k St*«l. S«»«4«l» 4O
zzz^J?"' pjT2" " PYC c"""
~'^^Sp^:~r
jjj- ->•» -.-•
|S~C"'M r/-oso* $ut OM"""
S^*£ — C.(U»1t< J««4 ««4 5«»«l
.O.T'- i-R>
12.5'— ^j^J'T-^
. 1* 4 • Split $•••• S««»J«r a«rl«e
14. 0— ^~~
a
o
qo
-JO
O
<•
a
o
a;
a.
-------
Name of Individual Completing This Form MICHAEL COLLENTINE
Well Name or Number SS-39 _ Permit No.
Well Location T33N-R78W-6bb
County NATRONA _ State WYOMING
Name of Drilling Co.... ... .NORTHERN. TESTING LABORATORIES
Name of Driller MORRIS ORMONO AND TERRY TALKINGTON
Name of Owner of Well TEXACO INC
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Oesc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log _________ Water Chem, Pump Test
Other (Give type) WELL HISTORY,BLOW COUNTS
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. N.A. Total Depth 12.8' Depth of First Water 7.0'
D.epth of Artesian Zone __ Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If.more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
2"ID diam. from 0 ft. to 11.5 ft. Material PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Si:s of perforation • • - incnss by
Nuscer of perforations and depths
perforations from ft. to ft.
n n ————— „
Was screen installed: Yes X No ______
Diameter: 2"ID Slot size .080" set from 1.7 ft. to 10.7 ft.
_________ H n _____ lt H _______ |( lf _______ „
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack' 8-16 FRAC SILICA SAND
Packers BENTONITE
Type: Cement X ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) PELLETS
Depths of Bases Q.5[ 1.3'
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 1 GAL/SACX
No. Sacks 1
Method of Placing:Dropped X Pumped
8it or Reamer Size
" to depth of 12.5
1.5 to depth of 12.8
-------
WCUL LUIPLtliUN UAlA UdCa:
through 2-6-82
Name of Individual Completing This Form Henry R. Richter .
Well Name or Number P-l Permit No. 58006
Well Location* 33-79-laa
County Natrona • State Wyomi ng _
Name of Drill ing Co-.- -Water Well Services ' "
Name of Driller Buck Sawyer; Neil Boren
Name of Owner of Well Texaco Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) rotary
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type) Well History
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. ^urf. Elev. Total Depth 39 Depth of First Water 17
Cepcr, of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( 2 )
*nd attach extra sheets)
12-3/4"Q.D. diara. from 0 ft. to 28 ft. Material Schedule 40
ZHHI " " ZZII " " " " carbon steel
10-3/4"O.D. " " 28 " " 29 " " Schedule 40""
carbon steel
Perforations: Type of perforator used
Size of perforation
Number of perforations ana
perforations from
Was screen installed: Y
Diameter: 10-3/4"O.D. SI
Was well gravel packed:
Type of pack'
it
n
es X
ot size
n
Yes
inches by
deptns .
ft. to
No
0.080 set from
No X
inches
ft.
29 ft. to 39 ft.
n n ii
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Ben ton i te
Depths of Bases (volclay) pellets Ib ft.
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 2/1
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: (Dropped ' X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
7 7/8 " to depth of 40
~" to depth of '
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BOREHOLE
P-l
PAGE _J OF _
COC. or COORO
GROUND ELEV
TOTAL DEPTH
BOREHOLE 01
« 33-79-1 aa
= 5095
4-0 '
AM
7^9" to 40'
MPTM
0-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
a - 10
10- II
II - 12
12- 13
13- 16
16- 17
17- 13
13- 20
20-23
23-30
30-35
-33-33
33-39
rtxt.
COHC [iBKJfl
•C^OMOff p*
MATZXIM.
Silt to Fin*
Gro»«l With
20mm Pibolit
SHI to V«nr
C«ar*« Sand
Sill to V«rr
Caari* Sand
Sill to
Co«r«* Sand
Silt to Fin*
Gravel
Silt to M«dliu»
Gravel
Silt to M*dlu*i
Gra»«l
Sill to Fin*
Grav*l
Sill to V«nr
Caart* Sand
'Silt to V«ry
Fin* Grqv*l
Silt to V«rr
Cjar»« Sand
Mi**iaq
Silt to Coara*
Sill to
Sill t»
Caari* Sand
U«dlum to
Caan* Sand
SJwl*
n....r. Wattr W«U S.rvtr..
Craig , Colorado n,Tr7-i-flt? ?-K.
• Sucic Sav»y«r •. N«U Sor«n T1UF O94S I5O(
ni
Bl
Ft
IOC
a Gardner - 0«nv«r Rotary npnonrs t_oa YF? >
TfSl
utn Air and WaTsr
OOCMrrtON AMO COMMCMTS
LIGHT BROWN
BLACK
OARX BROWN
3ROWM
UQHT BROWN
BUFF
OARX BROWN
-- . 12 3/4* Sco«duU 40
8LACX_ /Carson Sti.l Can.-.?
. (/ !^*x*C«m«nl Surfae* S«al
A«^ J 1
DARK i- i
BROWN \ .J
J (
BROWN 1 ; _ ... „ .,
^ "— ~0rill Ca»1inq»
BROWN ; '
||
l\',&&'}
i^TSE *t — — IP Ft. John* on Scrc«n
Ss
x a
«J 9
a a
o
e
a.
-------
Well Logs and Completion Data
For Monitoring Wells SS-56 through SS-63
-------
Job: 610.2
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 12/29/86
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 56 Permit No. UW 73724
Well LocationSW, SW, NW, NE, Sec. 6, T.33N., R.78W.. 50' NE of Tank314
County Natrona State WY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson -
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5106.9 Total Depth 30.0 Depth of First Water 21
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth -21 BLS
22.63 BMP
Well Completion - • •
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
2" I.D. . diam. from +1.25 ft. to 26.1 ft. Material Sch. 40 PVC
~~~^~~~~~~^^ n n . ii n n n
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-slotted PVC
Size of perforation 0.020" inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 16.2 ft. to 25.9 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No x_
Diameter: Slot size set trom ft. to ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack Natural sand & gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Granular
Depths of Bases 7.2' • bentonite
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks 3.5
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size -- ._.--..
- ___3ix8 " to depth of "30.0 ':.
" to depth of '
-------
SS-56
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE-L. OF_L
LOC.ORCOORDS SV,SV,NV,NE
SEC 6, T 35 N, R 78 V
GROUND FIFV 5106.9'
TOTAL HFPTH 30.0-
8
nPIIIFpVATSONVELL
MITPHVAT^nN
PIH MOBILE B-S2 AUGER
BIT(S)_3_l/4_:
FLUID.
X8"HSA
NONE
START
HATT'12/29
TIME 1105
GEOPHYSLOG
12/29/86
1510 !
•I
_YESJ£_NO
ro
Ul
to
2 >•
O O3
CO
r
ce
CO
o
o
o
UJ
O
o.
DEPTH
0*-6'
4-6'
6-151
15-24'
24-26'
26-27.5'
27.5-30'
MATERIAL
CLAY
SAND
S AND & GRAVEL
S AND & GRAVEL
SAND'* GRAVEL
S AND & GRAVEL
SAND & GRAVEL
SANDY CLAY
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
5/5
5/5
8/8
9/10
VI /9
10/10
150/10
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
GRAY-BROVN SANDY CLAY.
LIGHT BROVN, POORLY SORTED, SUB-ANGULAR TO
SUB-ROUNDED, FINE TO COARSE-GRAINED SAND.
PREDOMINANTLY MEDIUM-GRAINED, QUARTZITIC.
SAME SAND AS ABOVE YITH PEBBLES AND COBBLES
UP TO 3" DIAMETER COMPRISING ' 2095 OF SAMPLE.
SAME SAND AS ABOVE YITH " 3055 FINE PEBBLE
GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY DAMP. GRAVEL COMPOSED OF
SUBROUNDED TO ROUNDED METAMORPHIC CLASTS.
SAME SAND AS ABOVE YITH ~ 5055 FINE TO COARSE
PEBBLE GRAVEL. LOVER SAMPLE IS VET.
SAME SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE VITH COBBLES,
YET.
SAME SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE, LIGHT GRAY,
DAMP TO VET.
LIGHT BROVN SANDY CLAY, VEATHERED MESAVERDE
FORM AT ION BEDROCK.
TD=30'
\western
\7J9ieT
-.'Consultants
-------
SS-56
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE_2_oF_J
LOC.ORCOORDS SV,SV, NV,NE,
SEC6,T35N,R78 V
Fl FV 5106.9'
TOTAL DEPTH 30-0>
BOREHOLE DIAM.JL
nPIIIFpVATSONVELL
SERVICE
MITCH VATSON
PIH MOBILE B-52 AUGER
BIT(S) 3 1/4"X8-HSA
FLUID NONE
FINISH
DATF
1105
GEOPHYSLOG
1510
z £
O CO
h- O
DEPTH
MATERIAL
CJ
O
O
r
cc
-c
u.
V
2
V)
O
CJ
X
o
ct
Q.
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
•1 .25' [
5. 8' — \
IT— t
<\
1 A 9'
95 9*
26. r-
xn n§
|
i
>'
i
j
1
*•*.*"•* •*•".*"-
1 6"I.D.X2'LO
a*
'/•V-V'.V'
- NEATCEME
-GRANULAR
— 2" I.D.PVC
NATURAL C
ROYS 0.1
GROUND LEVEL
2" I.D. PVC CASING, THREADED FLUSH JOINT
estern
-------
Job: 610.2
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 12/30/86
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 57 Permit No. UW 73725
Well Location SW, NW. SW, NE, Sec. 6. T.33N.. R.78W.
County Natrona State WY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type).
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5112.1' Total Depth 35' Depth of First Water 26
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth 26
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one easing per hole give number ( '
and attach extra sheets) . '
2" I.D. . diam. from +1.5 ft. to 31.5 ft. Material Sch. 40 PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-slotted Pipe
Size of perforation 0.020 inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 21.65 ft. to 31.4 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No x
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack Natural sand & gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Granular
Depths of Bases 7.0' bentonite
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks 4
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size -
3 i" x 8 " to depth of ' 35.0 ' ' -^ --:--,: -
•-• " to depth of '
-------
SS-57
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAfiF 1 OF _ L
LOC.ORCOORDS SV,NV,SV,NE,
SEC6,T33N,R78 V
GROUND FIFV 5112.1
TOTAL DFPTH 35.0-
BOREHOLE DIAM.JL
nPMIFP VATSONVELL
SERVICE _ ' '
MITCH VATSON _
MOB1LEB-52 AUGER
BIT(S) 5 1/4-X8-HSA
Fl Uin
-NONE
- START
DATF 12/30
TIME 0735
GEOPHYS LOG
FINISH r
12/30/86
1025
-YESJL.NO
in
O 03
ce
-c
cn
O
O
o
UJ
O
DEPTH
0-6'
6 "-32'
32-35'
MATERIAL
SAND
SAND & GRAVEL
SAND & GRAVEL
OVA
-READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
8/8 (6T
8/8 (8f)
-7/7 (10')
5/5 (180
5/5 (251)
1000/5 (280
1500/5 (350
ELEV=3113.811-
4.51-
7.0"
21.65'.
31.4'
31.5':
35.0'.
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
LIGHT BROVN CLAYEY, FINE TO MEDIUM SAND,
GRAVELLY.
LIGHT BROVN, MEDIUM TO COARSE QUARTZ SAND,
SUB ANGULAR TO SUBROUNDED, MODERATELY SORTED
VITH 2053 FINE TO COARSE PEBBLE GRAVEL;
OCCASIONAL COBBLES TO 3" DIAMETER, MORE
ABUNDANT @ 10-12'. GRAVEL AND COBBLES ARE
PREDOMINANTLY METAMORPHIC AND IGNEOUS ROCK
TYPES; FINE TO MEDIUM PEBBLES ABOUT 7553
QUARTZ. DAMP AT "26'.
GRAY-BROVN SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE, VET.
TD=35'
NEAT CEMENT
-GRANULARBENTONITE
ii|_ 2" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 , THREADED FLUSH JOINT
PVC CASING
NATURAL GRAVEL PACK
6" I.D. X 2' LOCKING SECURITY COVER
GROUND LEVEL
•4 ROVS 0.020" X 1 " SLOTS
-------
Job: 610.2
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 12/30/86
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 58 Permit No. UW 73726
Well Location SE. SE, SE, NW. Sec. 6. T.33N., R.78 W.
County Natrona State WY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5114.0' Total Depth 37' Depth of First Water 30'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth 30'
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( ]
and attach extra sheets)
i
2" I.D. . diam. from +1.3 ft. to 34.0 'ft. Material Sch. 40 PVC
it
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-cut slots
Size of perforation 0.020" inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 24.2 , ft. to 33.8 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No X
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
n ii it
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack Natural sand & gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Granular
Depths of Bases 10.5 bentonite
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
3 i x 8 " to depth of 37 ~:.' '-. ,,-- - - -
" to depth of '
-------
o
13
CD
o
o
o
u
Ul
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BORFHnt F SS-58
PAGE_1_OF_1
LOC.ORCOORDS SE,SE,SE,NY,
SEC6,T33N,R78 V
GROUND FIFV 5114.0-
TOTAL DFPTH 37.0-
BOREHOLE DIAMjB;
DRIUFP VATSONVELL
SERVICE
MITCH VATSON
Rift MOBILE B-52 AUGER
BIT(S) 5 1/4"X8"HSA
•Fltlin- -NONE •
START FINISH .
12/30 12/30/86
1530
TIME 1245
GEOPHYS LOG
-YESJL.NO
O 03
O
O
3
CO
o
X
o
LU
-3
o
cc
o.
DEPTH
0-4.5'
4.5'-10.0'
10-14'
14-37'
MATERIAL
CLAY
SAND
SAND & GRAVEL
SAND & GRAVEL
OVA
• READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
8/8 (2') .
7/7 (6')
7/7 (12')
9/7 (17')
10/7 (221)
9/7 (271)
12/6 (32')
10.5'
24.2'•
33.8'_
34.0
37.0' •
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
LIGHT BROYN SANDY CLAY, SLIGHTLY DAMP
LIGHT BROYN, MEDIUM SORTED, SUBANGULAR TO
SU8ROUNDED QUARTZ SAND, 5-1095 GRANULES.
LIGHT BROVN, MEDIUM TO COARSE QUARTZ SAND AS
ABOVE YITH 20-3053 FINE TO MEDIUM PEBBLE
GRAVEL
LIGHT BROYN, COARSE TO VERY COARSE,
MODERATELY YELL SORTED, SUBROUNDED TO SUB-
ANGULAR QUARTZ SAND YITH 20-3055 FINE TO
MEDIUM PEBBLE GRAVEL. COARSE TO VERY COARSE
PEBBLES AND OCCASIONAL COBBLES BELOY 19'.
S3 OF PEBBLES INCREASES TO 30-4053. VET @ -25'.
YATER BETYEEN 27' AND 321. TD=37'
6" I.D. X 2' LOCKING SECURITY COVER
GROUND LEVEL
NEAT CEMENT
3 GRANULAR BENTONITE
. 2~ I.D. SCHEDULE 40 , THREADED FLUSH JOINT
PVC CASING
NATURAL GRAVEL PACK
•4 ROYS 0.020" X 1 " SLOTS
Consultant
-------
Job: 610.2
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 12/30/86
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 59 Permit No. UW 73727
Well Location NW. SW, SW, NE, Sec. 6. T.33N., R.78 W.,
County Natrona • State WY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5114.4' Total Depth 37' Depth of First Water 29'
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth 29'
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number ( }
and attach extra sheets)
2" I.D.' . diam. from +1.1 ft. to 33.7 ft. Material Sch. 40 PVC
II II II II II II
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-slotted pipe
Size of perforation 0.020" inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 23.8 ft. to 33.6 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No X
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
II II H It
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack Natural sand & gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Granular
Depths of Bases 6.1 bentonite
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks 3
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
v - - 8 " to depth of 37
. . " to depth of ' •••-"•
-------
SS-59
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE_LOF_L
in
CO
CO
0
T
CO
CO
UJ
Ul
UJ
01
o
0
o
_J
c;
u.
Z
h-
1-
co
Ul
O
CJ
X
UJ
CJ
Ul
C
a
a
1 nnnrn PV KtlTH S THOMPSON :
LOC.ORCO
SEC6,T
GROUND E
TOTAL DE
BOREHOLI
DEPTH
0-4.0'
4-14.0'
14-37.0'
nons NV,SV,SV,NE,
33N,R78 V
IFV 5114.4-
PTH 37.0'
» niAM ^
MATERIAL
SAND
SAND & GRAVEL
S AND & GRAVEL
£LEV=51
OVA
GRILLE
SERVIC
•pVATSONVELL TATT PIMPM
^C ~
MirrwvAT^nN DATF i^/^u 12/31/86
PIH MOBILI B-52 AUGER Tlr"^ 1630 1130
BIT(S)
FLUID.
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
4/4 (6') -
4/4 (ID
7/4 (170
5/4 (22')
500/5 (270
2000/10 (100
2700/12 (37';
15 70'-
4.5' —
6.1 — •;
23.8'
33.6' _
33.7'
31/4"X8"HSA GEOPHYS LOG
-NONE YES_X_NO
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
LIGHT BROVN FINE TO MEDIUM, POORLY TO MOD-
ERATELY SORTED, SUBANGULAR QUARTZ SAND VITH
5S3 GRANULES.
LIGHT BROVN MEDIUM TO VERY COARSE, MODERATELY
SORTED, SUBANGULAR TO SUBROUNDED QUARTZ SAND
VITH 5-1 OSS MEDIUM TO VERY COARSE PEBBLE
GRAVEL AND 5-1 OSS GRANULES. GRAVEL MAINLY
IGNEOUS AND METAMORPHIC ROCK FRAGMENTS.
GRAVEL CONTENT INCREASES TO 30SS BY 9.0',
SLIGHTLY DAMP. "
LIGHT BROVN MEDIUM TO VERY COARSE, MODERATELY
SORTED, SUBROUNDED TO SUBANGULAR QUARTZ SAND
VITH ~30-50SS GRANULES AND FINE TO MEDIUM
' PEBBLE GRAVEL. <5SS COARSE TO VERY COARSE
PEBBLE GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY DAMP. VET AT 29.0'
i 1
1
>.
j
1
1
;.;.•:./:.;.•'.••;.•'.••;••;
6" I.D. X 2' LOCKING SECURITY COVER ;
GROUND LEVEL
- NEAT CEMENT
-GRANULAR BENTONITE
_ 2" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 , THREADED FLUSH JOINT
PVC CASING
" NATURAL GRAVEL PACK
—4 RDV^I n O9n" y 1 ~ ^i OT<;
Water
'
-------
Job: 610.2
..,,.. BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1/5/87
Name of individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 60 Permit No. UW 73728
Well Location NE, SE. SE, NW, Sec. 6. T.33N.. R.78 W.,
County Natrona State WY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5110.3' Total Depth 37' Depth of First Water 26.3
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule .(If more than.one casing per hole give number (______}
and attach extra sheets)
\
2" I.D." . diam. from +1.8 ft. to 29.7 ft. Material Sch. 40 PVC
II II II II II
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-slotted pipe
Size of perforation 0.020" inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 19.8 ft. to 29.6 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes ^ No
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack Natural sand & gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Granular
Depths of Bases 7.0 bentonite"
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks 3
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size ....
4" x 8 HSA " "to depth of 37 ". - -. . .
11 to depth of ' -- • " '
-------
SS-60
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE_1_ OF 5
LOC.ORCO
SEC6,T
GROUND E
TOTAL DEf
BOREHOLE
DEPTH
0-3.5'
—SPLIT SF
3.5-4.0'
4.0-4.5'
4.5-6.5'
6.5-8.5'
8.5-9.7'
9.7-11.7'
11.7-13.7'
13.7-15.0'
DRDS NE,SE,SE,NV, nPII 1 FP VATSON VELL . . O.TAPT rifjrn
33 N; R 78 V • - • SERVICE s_a_L nman
IFV5110.3' MITCH VATSON DATF ' /s 1/5/87
3TH 37.0' pin MOBILE B-52 AUGER I TIME 0940 1545
niAM 8" B|T(S) 31/4-X8-HSA GEOPHYS LOG
mnn NONE _YESJI_NO
MATERIAL
•
CCAY
OON SAMPLES-
SAND
SAND
SAND
SAND
SAND
SAND
SAND
SAND & GRAVEL
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
16/12(1.0') .
12/12(2.5')
12/12(3.5')
12/12(4.0')
12/12(4.20
12/12(5.0')
12/12(5.5')
12/12(6.2)
12/12(6.7')
12/12(7.2')
12/12(8.0)
11/11 (9.9')
11/11 (10.50
11/11 (1 1.3')
12/10(12.0')
10/10(12.50
10/10(13.00
10/10(13.5')
14/14 (13.9')
14/14 (14.50
14/14 (14.90
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
•
LIGHT BROVN AND BLACK SANDY CLAY, BECOMES
SANDIER FROM 2.5-3.5'. GRADES TO SAND @ 3.5'.
LIGHT BROVN MODERATELY SORTED, SU8ROUNOED TO
SUBANGULAR QUARTZ SAND, CLAYEY
LIGHT BROVN MEDI UM-GRAINED, MODERATELY
SORTED, SUBANGULAR TO SUBROUNOED QUARTZ
SAND, OCCASIONAL GRANULES.
AS ABOVE.
LIGHT BROVN AND LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM SAND AS
ABOVE VITH IRON-STAINED LAYER 6.7-6.9', ROOTS
AND CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL THROUGHOUT, CLAY
LAYERS 7.5-7.55' AND 8.2-8.25'. SAND IS MEDIUM
TO COARSE VITH 1095 GRANULES AND VERY FINE TO
FINE PEBBLE GRAVEL FROM 7.55-8.5'.
AS ABOVE.
LIGHT GRAY-BROVN MEDIUM TO VERY COARSE,
MODERATELY SORTED, SUBROUNDED TO SUBANGULAR
QUARTZ SAND VITH 2055 GRANULES AND 555 FINE
TO MEDIUM PEBBLE GRAVEL. OCCASIONAL COBSLES
TO 3" DIAMETER PRESENT IN CUTTINGS.
SAND AS ABOVE, COARSER BELOV 13'.
LIGHT GRAY-BROVN, COARSE TO VERY COARSE
MODERATELY SORTED, SUBANGULAR TO SUBROUNDED
QUARTZ SAND VITH 20-3095 VERY FINE TO FINE
PEBBLE GRAVEL AND 5-1053 FINE TO MEDIUM PEBBLES
1
a.
o
t-
v>
in
to
o
o
z
ce
en
O
o
o
LU
O
cc
O.
Water
'V-onsuHant
-------
PROJECT TEXACO EAST TANK FARM
LOCATION VESTOFSS-15
LOGGED BY KEITH S THOMPSON
O\ -&. K) o CO Ot tn
co co co co tn In J.
i'i>' ' a\
W M N) M M — .
-si G> Jn • K) O CO O1
b bo 'co co bo en
• • • * ii
tn en o tn oi (n *£
1 i i 1 i 1 i
£o £o J?9 5* J* po $*
8 3 8 '§ 8 8 |
> > > > > > 5
< < < < < < m
pr\ fr\ m m m m ,— I
r- r- r- r- r- r- ^
o a o o — N> J-J — — — en -vi tn KJMKJK)
o o o o enentn — > — — tn ->J tn K> K> s> M
X-^X-N ^^ /-N ^S ^>. <"v S^ ^\ /'•N >~N <"> /~N /™ * ^N .r-v <^
crs en jlw M -"••"* ovfl co co -vi cr» ot tn tn tn
(j) '-j en tn en tn b tn en en b KJ lr> w vo tn KJ
H> 2 •T'2tn tn tntn tntn n-ntn tntn
II O O "2 2 ?S "ZZ. "7 2H ^^ 7"\ <2 c5 2
w 5 ^ 3 < o o 10 =go eg m o 10
• r^i ' tO ^^ ^^ ^^ '*~ i ^> L«| ^» i * i ^ ^^ _j ^^
f^ _— "^ « -^ •••• • -^ ' * * «^ if\ ^7 «^ • - -^
^*^ v^ *~i rn - *^ ^^ *^« /n **• ™* ^™ «^ ^-
—^ tn f™i »j? ^j 31 -^ ^?
^i C3 ^> ^~ ^> ^>. «^ ^^ *—• ^^ "•" ^ ^^ -^ ^^
* tO rr\ rri " r^\ ^ rr\ ^^ rri * rn
^tnQ^mf-J p- r^Of^ ^ *® r~ r™
•C>=7_j>> > >3> ^m> >
j^^cotn tn tn-tn Qr~tn in
•^r-CO^j, 5,. >. 5> •<53k 5"
Zzf^rnco CD CO CO >;jCO CO
OO-CDO ° ° ° r-too o
>O nm m m'm id^jm m
°25tn tnm2j-nO w
d01 S> "^ •*" CD70 ~*
? p 8c P £ ££< f1
"^" Q *2 C5 ^^ ^^ ?T1 ^*~ Ci
f1^ -<* C? ^ 1? u~\ ^" r~ C"i ^2
r™ ^* — { j-— «^ rn ^. ^™
>M^Q "^O'T^ *^
> b. <5 §§p|^ 3
o SM -cmh^tn -<
< X) ^ ° O
. -C 2;
DO
^>
ll
^ ?
O
o
m
TJ
X
3
-i
1
r-
P3
> °
1>
O
O
m
to
O
XI
T)
-H
O
o
O
O
z
m
2
H
tn
tn — » en
o o TO
XJ -1 0
m £ c:
rx: ^ 2:
000
o 7"^ '^
•7
CO
1
i -
w
b
<
tn
.*»*
p
fkJ
VI
O
to r*
n 73
H-—
O
W JO
W 0
73
CO
-
•^
2
m
tn
m
*
tn
rn
2
-n CD TO
1 CT
^"^ r^ *^
O
1
2
o
m
•
*
LO
^>-
W
^~
I
X
CO
t
J^
tn
>
o
CO
r-
CD
en
N)
c
a
m
52
2
o
<
>.
in
o
2
3?
_^
n
m
i
r—
m
a
<
>
tn
o
rn
m
f^
r-
OHO
^ rs -^
o 2H
^} fTJ _i t ft t
(n
i—
, o
o
0
-f^
o
™ _.
in
U I
K
2
O
en
tn
•1 V
t n ^
i_ii
lj
>
a
-i
— :
S!
03 -
]i
z:
n
E
•vl .
a
3
O
O3
O
m
x
o
r~
m
TJ
O
PI
N)
GO
O
7)
3
o
-------
LOG OF BOREHOLE
BQREHfllF SS-60
PAGE_3_ QP 3
in
T
^O
{/J
u.
O
^-
Ul
2
O
1-
< 1
fiFft RY KEITH S THOMPSON
lpnr)RCnpRD55 NE/SE,SE,NVJ
SEC 6, T 33 tT, R 78V"
HRHIINn F! FV 5110.3'
THTAI HFPTH 37.0'
RnRFHniFniAM 8"
DEPTH MATERIAL
-
DRI
SEF
U FR VATSON VELL
{VICE
MITCH VATSON
RIG
BIT
Fill
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
MOBILE B-52 AUGER
(S) 3 1/4"X8"HSA
in ' -NONE
START FINISH
DATF 1/5 1/5/87
TIME 0940 1545
GEOPHYS LOG
YESJL.NC
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
-
ce
O
O
X
CJ
u/
O
cc
0.
6" I.D. X 2' LOCKING SECURITY COVER
GROUND LEVEL
NEAT CEMENT
-GRANULAR BENTONITE
iij_ 2" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 , THREADED FLUSH JOINT
PVCCASING
NATURAL GRAVEL PACK
4 ROVS 0.020" X 1 " SLOTS
-------
J9b: 610.2
BASIC .WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1/6/87
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 61 Permit No. UW 73729
Well Location SE, NE, SE, NW, Sec. 6. T.33N., R.78 W.,
County Natrona State JWY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Loo Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type) •
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5106.0' Total Depth 32' Depth of First Water 21
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth 2QT~
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give number (
and attach extra sheets) '
2" I.D. ' . diam. from +1.2 ft. to 25.4 ft. Material Sen. 40 PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-slotted pipe
Size of perforation 0.02Q" inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 15.5 to 25. 3 ft.
II II II II II
II II II II " II
Was screen instc
Diameter:
Was well gravel
Type of pack
Packers
Type: Cement
Depths of Bases
illed: Yes No x
Slot size set from ft. to ft.
packed: Yes No
; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Granular
3 -5 Bentonite
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks 2
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
-4" x 8 " to depth of 32
" to depth of '
-------
OO f 4
BdRFHOI F ob-61
LOG OF BOREHOLE PAGE_!_ 0F_2_
tr>
o
to
X
<
u_
O
UJ
CO
\n
•z.
o
CO
OL
O
?
CO
I
£
z >-
O O3
1- O
•< ft
o g
o ~^
— ' _J
Z
Of.
*
z.
jf
H-
*<
O
0
X
h-
CJ
UJ
0
o:
0.
\
inr nprnnons SE.NE.SE.NV,
SEC6,T33N,R78 V
r.oniiMn n FV 5106.0'
THTAI HFPTH 32.0'
O **
DEPTH
0-1.0'
1-4.5'
4.5-13.0'
13-17.0'
17-21.0'
21-32.0'
MATERIAL
SAND
SAND
S AND & GRAVEL
S AND & GRAVEL
S AND & GRAVEL
SAND & GRAVEL
OVA
DRIIIFP. VATSONVELL ^A«-T
_.__..._,. , . , OIHKI rlNlon
SERVICE '
MITrHWATSriN DATF 1/6 1/6/87
RIH MOB ILEB-52 AUGER TIME 1000 1210
BIT(S) 3 1/4"X8"HSA GEOPHYS LOG
Flllin NONE YES_X_NO
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
BACKGROUND
"150-200 PPM
(DRILL RIG
EXHAUST)
50/200(1.5')
20/200 (5')
30/250(7.5')
20/150(12')
20/75(1
-
4')
15/50(17')
11/40(19')
10/40(21.0')
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
DARK BROVN GRAVELLY, CLAYEY QUARTZ SAND,
DAMP FROM 10" SNOV 1 /S/87.
LIGHT BROVN MEDIUM, SU8ROUNDED TO SUB-
ANGULAR, MODERATE TO VELL SORTED QUARTZ
SAND, 5S5 GRANULES, DAMP.
LIGHT BROVN MEDIUM TO VERY COARSE, SUB-
ROUNDED TO SUB ANGULAR, MODERATELY SORTED
QUARTZ SAND VITH 2055 GRANULES AND 5-15S5 FINE
TO COARSE PEBBLED GRAVEL, DAMP, OCCASIONAL
COBBLES TO 3" DIAMETER.
LIGHT BROVN, COARSE TO VERY COARSE, SUB-
ROUNDED TO SUB ANGULAR, MODERATELY SORTED
QUARTZ SAND VITH 2555 GRANULES AND 10-25S3
FINE TO MEDIUM PEBBLE GRAVEL AND OCCASIONAL
COBBLES TO 2.5" DIAMETER, DAMP.
SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE BUT NO COBBLES,
DAMP, VATER AT "21 '.
120/40(22.0') SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE, BUT MEDIUM GRAY,
1500/40
7000/40
(22.5') SATURATED.
(23.0') TD=32.0'
10,000/40(24.0')
25,000/50 (26.0')
20,000/75(29.0')
24,000/75(32.0')
Consultants
-------
SS-61
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE_2_ OF_L
in
O CD
I- O
-C **•
CO
O
o
x
o
O
CK
0.
LOC.OR COORDS SE.NE,S£,NV,
SEC6,T33N,R78 V _
GROUND FIFV 5106.0- _
TOTAL DFPTH 32.0'
BOREHOLE DIAM_§:
DEPTH
MATERIAL
nPHIFPVATSONVELL
SERVICE
MITCH VATSON _
MOBILEB-52 AUGER
BIT(S) 3 1/4-X8-HSA
FLUID. NONE
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
START
DATE,
1/6
FINISH
1/6/87
TIME 1000
1210
GEOPHYS LOG
ELEV=5107.34'
32.0'•
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
6" I.D. X 2' LOCKING SECURITY COVER
GROUND LEVEL
NEAT CEMENT
GRANULAR BENTONITE
£j_ 2" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 , THREADED FLUSH JOINT
PVC CASING
NATURAL GRAVEL PACK
4 ROVS 0.020" X 1" SLOTS
ponsuHanta
-------
Job: 610.2
... ,; BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1/6/87
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 62 Permit No. UW 73730
Well Location SW, NE, SW. NE, Sec. 6. T.33N., R.78 W.t
County Natrona State WY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson
-Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type).
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5114.6' Total Depth 42' Depth of First Water 30
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth 29.8
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more-.than .one casing per hole give number ( ]
and attach extra sheets)
2" I.D.' . diam. from +1.50 ft. to 34.45 ft. Material Sen. 40 PVC
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-slotted pipe
Size of perforation 0.020" inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 24.55 to 34.35 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack Natural sand & gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other (desc.) Granular
Depths of Bases 6.5' bentonite
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks 5
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size . !
3 i" x 8 " to depth of 42 '
- - " to depth of —'
-------
SS-62
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE_1_ OF_L
LOC.ORCO
HRHS SW,NE,SV,NE, nmnrDVAT SON YELL
SEC6,T33N,R78Y SERVICE , . . U'MK' ' Im°"
GROUND E
TOTAL DE
BOREHOLI
DEPTH
0-2.0'
2-5.0'
5-14.0'
14-26.0'
26-32.0'
32-40.0'
1 FV 5114.6' MITCH YATSON DATFl/b 1/7/87
PTH 42.0' pin MOB ILEB-52 AUGER TIME *505 1105
•mAM8" BIT(S) 3 1/4-X8-HSA GEOPHYS LOG
rilim NONE ES^_HO
MATERIAL
CLAY HIGH
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
BACKGROUND 0
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
N 0V A L IGHT BROYN S ANDY CL A Y , D AMP
("200 PPM), VIND ISTROM FROM RECENT SNOY.
LITTLE AMERICA'S DIRECTION (EAST)
SAND
SAND & GRAVEL
•
S AND & GRAVEL
SAND 5. GRAVEL
SAND & GRAVEL
80/200 (2.0')
60/200(4.0')
50/200 (5.01)
30/200 (7.0')
40/150(9.0')
40/120(11.0';
35/80(15.0')
40/70(17.0')
32/60(21.0')
40/50 (22.0')
35/50(24.0')
28/50 (26.0')
25/45 (28.0)
22/45(30.0')
24/45(32.0')
50/45 (33.00
LIGHT BROYN MEDIUM TO COARSE, MODERATELY
SORTED, SUBROUNDED TO SUBANGULAR QUARTZ
SAND VITH 5SS GRANULES AND OCCASIONAL FINE
TO MEDIUM PEBBLES, DAMP.
LIGHT BROYN SAND AS ABOVE YITH 3055 FINE TO
MEDIUM PEBBLES AND 10S3 COARSE PEBBLES AND
OCCASIONAL COBBLES TO 2" DIAMETER, DAMP.
LIGHT BROYN COARSE TO VERY COARSE,
MODERATELY SORTED, SUBROUNDED TO SUB-
ANGULAR QUARTZ SAND AND 30S5 FINE TO COARSE
PEBBLE GRAVEL, DAMP.
LIGHT BROYN SAND AS ABOVE BUT ONLY 1 055 FINE
PEBBLES AND 5S5 MEDIUM PEBBLES, NO COBBLES.
YATER AT ~30.0'.
LIGHT GRAY SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE,
120/50(34.0') SATURATED.
250/60(36.0')
1500/60(38.00 TD=40.0'
REDRILLED TO 42.0' ON 1 /7/87.
o ca
cc.
o
o
X
CJ
LU
o
o:
a.
-------
SS-62
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE.
OF.
LOC.ORCOORDS SW,NE.SV,NE,
SEC 6, T 33 N, R 78 V
GROUND ELEY.
TOTAL DEPTH.
5114.6'
42.01
BOREHOLE DIAM_§I
nPIIIFpVATSONVELL
SERVICE
MITCH VATSON
RIG.
MOBILE B-52 AUGER
BIT(S).3 t/4-X8"HSA
FLUID.
NONE
START
DATE.
1/6
TIME 1505
GEOPHYS LOG
FINISH ,..
1/7/87
1105
_YES_X_NO
O CD
P O
d &
DEPTH
MATERIAL
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
ELEV=5116.27' —
1.5'
4.5'-
6.5"
ce
en
O
O
24.55'
34.35'-
34.45'
42.0'
O
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
6" I.D. X 2' LOCKING SECURITY COVER
GROUND LEVEL
NEAT CEMENT .
-hGRANULAR BENTONITE
2" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 , THREADED FLUSH JOINT
PVC CASING
NATURAL GRAVEL PACK
-4 ROVS 0.020" X 1" SLOTS
-------
Job: 610.2
BASIC WELL COMPLETION DATA Date: 1/8/87
Name of Individual Completing This Form Keith S. Thompson
Well Name or Number SS - 63 Permit No.
Well Location SE, SW. NW, NE, Sec. 6. T.33N., R.78 W.
County Natrona State WY
Name of Drilling Co. Watson Well Service
Name of Driller Mitch Watson
Name of Owner of Well Texaco, Inc.
Type of Drilling Rig (Cable tool, rotary, etc.) Hollow-Stem Auger
Data Available (attach copies if available)
Sample Desc. X Geophysical Logs (Type)
Drilling Time Log Water Chem. X Pump Test
Other (Give type)
Summary Log: (feet)
Grd. Surf. Elev. 5114.8' Total Depth 42' Depth of First Water 35
Depth of Artesian Zone Final Water Depth
Well Completion
Casing schedule (If more than one casing per hole give, number ( )
and attach extra sheets)
2" I.D. . diam. from +1.3 ft. to 35.6' ft. Material Sch. 40 PVC
II II II II II
Perforations: Type of perforator used Factory-slotted pipe
Size of perforation 0.020" inches by 1.0 inches
Number of perforations and depths
1472 perforations from 25.75 to 35.55 ft.
Was screen installed: Yes No ;
Diameter: Slot size set from ft. to ft.
Was well gravel packed: Yes X No
Type of pack Natural sand & gravel
Packers
Type: Cement ; rubber shale ; other Granular bentonite
Depths of Bases 24.5 20.0' Neat Cement/bentonite mix
Cement surface seal:
Mixing Ratio (Water/Sx) 6 gal/sack
No. Sacks 12 sacks cement/7 bags (3501) Bentonite
Method of Placing: Dropped X Pumped
Bit or Reamer Size
3 i" x 8 " to depth of - 42 _..-...---
" to depth of ' -•-—". - ' .
-------
SS-65
LOG OF BOREHOLE
pAOE_LoF_2_
VO
IT)
CO
Lu
o
CO
Ul
z:
2
0
f f\
UJ
OL
O
CO
t
LiJ
5-
O ™
t- o
<*\ o
r=S O
3 S
o:
i*.
z
1—
CO
LLJ
O
o
X
UJ
H-
s
o
ce
Q.
\
LOC.ORCO
IDnc; SE.SV,NV,NE, noiti ro VATSON VELL „,,„,
SEC6,T33N,R78 V SER
GROUND E
TOTAL DEf
BOREHOLE
DEPTH
0-4.0'
4-13.0'
13-28.0'
28-35.0'
35-42.0'
VICE ' " ~
? FV 5114.8' " • MITCH VATSON DATF ' n 1/7/87
3TH 42-°' PIH MOB ILEB-52 AUGER T'ME 1125 1530
•n.AM 8" R,TfS) 31/4"X8"HSA GEOPHYS LOG .
FLUID NONE YESJL.NO
MATERIAL
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
OVA NOT VORK1NG FO
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
R FIRST
CLAY 12' OF HOLE: USED EXPLOSION LIGHT BROVN SANDY CLAY, DAMP, GRAVELLY
S AND & GRAVEL
S AND & GRAVEL
SAND & GRAVEL
METER (55 LEL)
0.053(2.0')
0.053(7.0') '
15/,15(12'.0')
10/15(14.0')
9/15(17.0')
10/14(19.0')
9/14 (21.0')
10/14(23.0')
11/14(25:0')
15/18(27.0')
14/18(29.0')
@ 3-4'.
LIGHT BROVN MEDIUM TO COARSE, MODERATELY
SORTED, SUBROUNDED TO SUB ANGULAR QUARTZ
SAND VITH 1053 GRANULES AND 10-1555 FINE TO
MEDIUM PEBBLES, DAMP.
LIGHT BROVN COARSE TO VERY COARSE SAND,
MODERATELY SORTED, SUBROUNDED TO SUB-
ANGULAR, QUARTZITIC VITH 20S3 GRANULES, 1053
FINE TO COARSE PEBBLES AND OCCASIONAL COBBLES
TO 3" DIAMETER, DAMP.
\
SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE, BUT LIGHT BROVN
12/19 (31 .0') CHANGES TO LIGHT GRAY AND 53 COARSE PEBBLES
50/20 (33.0') INCREASES TO 2053, VET.
280/20(34.0')
1500/50(35.0')
SAND & GRAVEL 2800/50 (37.0') SAND AND GRAVEL AS ABOVE BUT LIGHT GRA.Y,
3500/70 (39.0') SATURATED, 53 OF COARSE MATERIAL INCREASES
8000/70 (40.0') SLIGHTLY VITH DEPTH.
14000/70(41.0')
18000/70(42.0') TD=42.0'
western
1
-------
BOREHntF SS-63
LOG OF BOREHOLE
PAGE.
OF.
LOC.OR COORDS SE,SV,NV,NE.
SEC6,T33NtR78 V _
GROUND ELEY.
TOTAL DEPTH.
5114.8'
42.0-
BOREHOLE DIAhJL
DRIUFP VATSONVELL
SERVICE
MITCH VATSON
Pin M08ILES-52 AUGER
BIT(S) 3 l/4-X8"HSA
Ft lim NONE
START
DATE.
TIME 1125
GEOPHYS LOG
FINISH
1/7/S7
1530
-YES_X_NO
SO
in
w
en
DEPTH
MATERIAL
OVA
READING
BACKGROUND
(PPM)
O CD
ELEV=5116.58' —
20.0'
24.5'
o:
in
o
o
<
x
uj
O
LLJ
O
ce
Q.
28.75'-
35.55'_
3S.65'
>.0*
DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
6" I.D. X 2' LOCKING SECURITY COVER
GROUND LEVEL
NEAT CEMENT
"-GRANULAR BENTONITE
2" I.D. SCHEDULE 40 , THREADED FLUSH JOINT
PVC CASING
NATURAL GRAVEL PACK
0.020"X 1" SLOTS
astern
ater
onsul tents
-------
Appendix 1. Inventory of Wells Located In the Part of the Casper Texaco Refinery South of the
North Platte R1vera
K Alternate11
Weir Well
Name Name Location0
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
SS-12
SS-13
SS-14
SS-1S
SS-16
SS-17
SS-18
SS-18*
SS-19
SS-20
SS-21
SS-22
3H
4N
4N
3H
3H
IN
IN
3N
2S
2N
2N
4N
2N
- ' 25
25
2N
2N
2N
2N
2N
IS
IS
IN
- IE
- 2W
• 2W
- 3E
- 3E
- 6E
- 8E
- 6E
- 2E
- 4H
- 5E
- 3W
- BE
• 8E
- 7E
- 4E
- 4£
- 2E
- 2E
- IE
- 1W
- 2M
- 4W
Top of
Date Casing
Drilled Elevation
(mean sea level
12- 0-61
12-10-81
12-10-81
12-11-81
12-12-81
12-13-81
12-15-81
12-16-81
1- 4-82
12-18-81
12-20-81
12- 7-81
6-23-82
7- 8-82
7-11-82
7-11-82
7-11-82
7-12-B2
7-14-82
7-14-82
7-16-82
7-13-82
7-14-82
5088.5
5089.3
5088.0
5089.3
5086.3
5107.6
5118.7
5115
5110.8
5100.8
5085.9
5093.3
5113.1
5117.8
5115.3
5097.8
5090.8
5089.1
5089.2
5088.5
5097.3
5097.8
5100.8
Casing
Inner
Diameter
) (feet)
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
. N.A.
0.33
. 0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.33
0.33
Totald
Depth
(feet)
45
47
46
20
20
20
60
60
59
23
26
28
44.5
68.5
37.5
18.5
13.5
14.0
14.0
18.0
25.0
22.5
32.5
Depth to
Bedrock
(feet)
35
37
36
19
20
19
60
9
54
23
26
28
28.5
68.5
37.5
18.5
12.5
14.0
14.0
18.0
25.0
22.5
17.5
Completion
Interval Remarks
(feet)
30-35
7.5-12.5
25-30
8-13
15-18
6-9 - -
42-45
N.A. • Dry hole, P & A
42-45
18-21 Selby trailer well
5-25
11-16
32.3-42.3 - -
31.7-41.7
29.1-35.1
8.3-17.3
3.7-12.7
N.A. Well silted In, P i A
3.2-13.2
7.5-17.5
10.3-20.3 - -
11.2-21.2 - -
19.2-29.2 - -
-------
Appendix 1. Inventory of Wells Located In the Part of the Casper Texaco Refinery South of the
North PUtte River8 (continued)
. Alternate
Weir Well
Name Name Location
55-23
55-24
SS-2S
55-26
55-27
55-28
55-29
55-30
55-32
55-33
55-34
55-35
55-36
55-37
55-39
P-l
Ob-1
Ob-2
2H
3N
2N
2N
3N
IN
2N
211
IS
311
3N
3N
4N
4N
2N
IN
111
IN
- 3W
- 3W
• 2W
- IW
- 3W
- 2W
- IW
- 3£
- 3W
- 4E
- IE
- IE
- IW
- IW
- 4E
- 2E
- 2E
- 2£
Top of
Date Casing
Drilled Elevation
(mean sea level )
7-14-82
7-14-82
7-15-82
7-15-B2
7-15-82
7-15-82
7-15-82
7-16-82
7-16-82
6-26-82
6-26-82
6-27-82
6-27-82
6-27-82
7-12-82
2- 1-82 -
2- 6-82
12-19-81
1- 6-82 -
1- 7-82
5097.9
5093.9
5097.8
5093.9
5095.0
5097.5
5092.3
5090.9
5099.7
5085.7
5085.9
5088.2
5087.3
5087.6
N.A.
5095.3
5097.3
5096.0
Casing
Inner
Diameter
(feet)
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.1V
0.17
0.17
0.17
1.06
0.33
0.3J
Totald
Depth
(feet)
23.0
22.0
22.5
22.5
22.5
27.5
22.5
15.1
24.0
14.5
25.1
30.0
33.5
32.7
12.8
39
37.5
40
Depth to
Oedrock
(feet) '
23.0
22.0
22.5
22.5
22.5
27.5
22.5
15.1
24.0
8.0
23.7
25.5
32.8
31.4
11.0
39
37
39
Completion
Interval Remarks
(feet)
11.0-21.0 - -
9.5-19.5 - -
10.8-19.8 - -
11.8-20.8 - -
10.3-19.3
14.3-23.3 - -
7.0-16.0 - -
5.1-15.1
13.0-23.0
2.5-8.5
4.4-14.4 - -
3.6-13.2
4.8-14.4
4.9-14.5
1.7-10.7 - -
29-39 Production well for multiple
well pump test
3-23 Observation well for multiple
well pump test
19-39 Observation well for multiple
well pump test
-------
Appendix
1, Inventory of Wells Located 1n the Part of
North Platte River (continued)
. Alternate
Well0 Hell
Name Name Location
M-41
H-41a
H-42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
55 -
5S -
35 -
4N -
2H -
2H -
HI -
2N -
3N -
527 3N -
525 3H -
P13 2H -
524 2N -
2H -
P4 2N -
2N -
IN -
P14 3N -
P5 IN -
IN -
5E
5E
4U
1W
IE
IE
1W
2W.
3W
4E
3E
1W
4E
3W
3VI
3W
3W
1W
3W
311
Top of
Date Casing
Drilled Elevation
(mean sea level)
2-6-62
2- 7-82
6-21-82
2- 6-82
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1957
1957
H.A.
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
5123
5114
5135
5086
5087
5087
5095
5094
5093
5086
5089
5090
5086
5097
5100
5101
5101
5086
5099
5098
.6
.1
.0
.2
.4
.4
.5
.0
.7
.7
.5
.0
.7
.9
.3
.4
.6
.3
.5
.7
4
4
6
4
6
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
Casing
Inner
Diameter
(feet)
0.33
0.17
N.A.
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
(culvert)
0.17
0,5
the Casper Texaco Refinery South of the
Total"
Depth
(feet)
49
55
20
19
11
11
19
18
15
11
14
43
15
20
21
22
22
9
30
17
.5
.6
.3
.8
.8
.9
.6
.3
.6
.0
.0
.4
.4
.4
Depth to
Bedrock
(feet)
49
55
20
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
13
13
38
13
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Completion
Interval Remarks
(feet)
46-49 - -
49-55
N.A. Hole collapsed, lost drill
String, hole P i A
N.A.
5-11 Assumed completion Interval
5-11 Assumed completion Interval
12-19
11-18
8-15
5-12
7-14
7-14
8-15
13-20
14-21
15-22
15-22
N.A. - -
N.A. - -
N.A. - -
-------
Appendix 1.
North Platte River*
Well6
Name
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
47
48
Alternate
Well
Name Location
2N
2N
P2 4N
PP1 4H
54 4N
4N
4N
3N
2H
P12 2N
P12a 2N
3N
3N
P10 HI
211
IN
2N
2N
P7 IS
IS
1H
211
- 3W
- 3W
- 3W
• 2H
• 2W
- 1W
- 1W
• 1W
- 2M
- 2W
• 2W
- 3E
- 4E
- 3E
- 2E
- 2E
- IE
- IE
- IE
- 1M
- 4H
- 4W
.w«.«w>. iii w.iw i ui k w i bnw vajpci ICAOV.U r\e i mei y juuui ui tile
(continued)
Top of
Dale Casing
Drilled Elevation
(mean sea level)
1957
1957
1957
1957
1948
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
N.A.
N.A.
5098.8
5096.8
5093.5
5088.7
5090.1
5088.1
N.A.
N.A.
5097.9
5095.9
5094.2
N.A.
5088.7
5090.6
N.A.
5094.2
N.A.
5093.7
5096.0
5098.1
N.A.
5099.9
Casing
Inner
Olaneter
(feet)
0.5
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
C.17
0.17
0.17
O'.S
0.17
0.5
0.17
0.17
0.17
0,17
0.5
0.17
0.5
0.17
O.i7
0.5
O.b
Totald
Depth
(feet)
17.2
16.0
40
40
40
13.9
8.5
17.7
18.6
50
50
15.1
19.1
30
N.A.
12.9
12.6
12.6
45
28.8
N.A.
27.3
Depth to
Bedrock
(feet)
N.A.
N.A.
35
33
34
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
43
43
N.A.
N.A.
26
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
40
H.A.
30
N.A.
Completion
Interval
(feet)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
20-27
Remarks
- -
- -
- -
- -
Interceptor well
Casing destroyed at surface
Casing bent at surface
Interceptor well
- -
- -
Casing bent at surface
--
Plugged and abandoned
Casing bent at surface
- -
Casing bent at surface
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
-------
Appendix 1. Inventory of Wells Located In the Part of the Casper Texaco Refinery South of the
North Platte R1vera (continued)
well6
Hame
P-3
P-6
P-0
P-9
P-ll
P-15
P-16
P-17
WW1
WW2
WW3
WW4
WW5
1 1
1 2
I 3
1 4
1 5
Alternate
Well
Name Location'
3H -
IS -
IS -
211 -
2N -
. 2S -
2S -
2S -
S9 4N •
S6 4N -
S2 511 •
5N -
18 411 -
5N -
5H -
SH -
N.A.
4N -
3U
1W
3E
4E
IE
2W
IE
IE
1W
1W
2W
3W
IE
IE
1W
1W
1W
Top of
Date Casing
Drilled Elevation
(mean sea level)
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1957
1948
1948
1948
1948
1947
H.A.
195$
1955
N.A.
195S
5092
5095
5092
5089
5086
5113
5108
5110
5003
5084
' 5084
N
5083
N
5078
5082
H
5082
.1
.3
.2
.8
.7
.2
.4
.3
.8
.5
.5
.A.
.5
.A.
.4
.1
.A.
.1
Casing
Inner
Diameter
(feel)
N
N
H
H
h
•N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
,
H
N
H
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
.A.
Tolald
Depth
(feet)
40
55
40
15
40
25 '
65
60
40
45
45
N.A.
25
H.A.
30
25
H.A.
30
Depth to
Oedrock
(feel)
32
49
33
10
35
19
61
56
31
40.7
37.8
H.A.
24
N.A.
25
24
N.A.
25
Completion
Inierval
(feel)
H.A.
H.A.
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
Remarks
Data from 19S7 Texaco Hap
CW-2177. Hole P i A
Data from 1957 Texaco Hap
CW-2177. Hole P i A
Assumed completion Interval
Data from 1957 Texaco Hap
CW-2177. Hole P 4 A
Data from 1957 Texaco Hap
CW-2177. Uncased exploratory
hole. Hole P & A
•
M
M
M
N
Oala not available
Data from 1957 Texaco Hap
Data nol available
Data from 19S7 Texaco Tup
CW-2177. Uncased exploratory
hole. Hole P i A
•
Data nol available
Oala from 1957 Texico Hap
CW-2177. Uncased exploratory
dole. Hole P f. A
-------
Appendix 1. Inventory of Wells Located in the Pan of the Casper Texaco Relfnery South of the
North Platte River (continued)
well*
Name
1 6
1 7
1 9
1 10
1 11
$7
Sll
513
514
516
S17
S18
S19
520
SZ1
522
523
526
Alternate
Well
Name Location
5N
5H
4H
4N
4H
4N
3N
3H
3N
3N
3N
3N
3N
2N
3N
3N
4H
311
-in
- 1C
- IE
- IE
- 2E
- 1W
- IE
• IE
- IE
- 2E
• 2E
- 2E
- 2E
- 4E
- 3E
- 1C
- 3W
- 3E
Top of Citing
Date Casing Inner
Drilled Elevation Diameter
(mean sea level) (feet)
1955
1955
1947
1955
1947
1948
1948
1948
1948
1948
1948
1948
1948
tl.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1957
5081.9
5002.9
5083.5
5081.8
5082.9
5083.8
5088.4
5085.5
5083
5080
5080
.. • 5080
5080
5080
5080
5080
5080
5084.2
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.*,.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N:A.
M.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Total*1
Depth
(ftet)
30
30
25
25
20
35
40
35
30
20
10-15
10-15
10-15
10-15
10-15
10-15
10-15
20
Depth to
Bedrock
(feet)
26
27
20
21
15
28
32.8
31
23
12
13
13
13
13
12
N.A.
II. A.
11
Completion
Interval Remarks
(feet)
H.A.
N.A.
N.A. Data from 1957 Texaco Hap
CW-2177. Uncased exploratory
hole. Hole f 4 A
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A. Backhoe pit. Part of
Interceptor systera
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A. - -
-------
APPENDIX D
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg. \T-
Site Name/Case No. Tftflffi
Well No./Location lM -(0
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
5, C S f
8c.
End
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth
Splits
Rev. 1: 4/86
End
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
/ r o
I •>
Radiation /;
Sediment
Color
Odor
i>':
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot *
Purge Depth
End
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
-------
Versar
MC
Date: Beg
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
ev.
4/86
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. /. 3
f3
End
C-eeJi
I f.
- 9
4. Sample Methods
s-//3/y<
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth
Splits
tr
2. General Observations
-
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIB>'
Radiation —
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Volume Removed
Equipment
End
Lot
Purge Depth
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
v
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Rev. 1: 4/86
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. . ? ~?
X 3 =
A-*
. 02,
\0 .
End
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth
Splits
End .A5"'
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
OH-
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
^ I
End
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin /7/J End I3S~O
Personnel
Equipment
Lot
Sample Depth t
Splits
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
Radiation
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
/
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot ft
Purge Depth
End
"7
Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
Other
-------
Vrrsar.
MC.
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. _
Well No./Location _
SMO No./Fac. No. S AA 6
End
7.67
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner) o b>3-rT " Y
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. ^ .
X 3 =
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
"
44
Sediment
Color
Odor '
V\
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
V)
Volume Removed
Equipment
Purge Depth
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin 165O
Personnel
End
Equipment
Lot
Sample Depth
Splits
JAifltft" fl
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material ^f/JIP'^fS
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
>i ,rflihu -t/y
Other
w
-------
WC.
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. fa til CD
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
t<> r
7 3 o'
• • •'
Rev*
Well No./Location />/- 3
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
sing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. _2
X 3 =
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel /
End
/3/fi
Equipment
Lot
A
Sample Depth fry) Ifi/] } IS AOJLUrtn
Splits
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
Radiation
Sediment
color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot
Purge Depth rfY)
rfY
End
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material P U(j
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
c/
-------
Vrrsai
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. _ / C
Well No./Location _
SMO No./Fac. No.
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Qlt,
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. I "^ S\\
X 3 =
No
zv
2.0,
End
4. Sample Methods
Date
M/l
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth /
Splits
Rev. 1: 4/86
Time: Begin 134^ End
Personnel
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, (TIP);
lit. » Uf «u ^ro
;ry
Radiation (3
Sediment
Color
U:
?/? h/i/l.mfl/i/'hnn cdcr
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot
Purge Depth
JQQ L&i
Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
End
Sample Methods ,
Time: Begin 13O ? End
Personnel
Equipment
Lot *
Sample Depth
Splits
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
Radiation
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot *
Purge Depth
End
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
Sampling Weather Conditions
Other
-------
Rev-
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. '
End
Well No./Location -JO 3 r
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height '_
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point (
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. 0.^;}
X 3 =
4#
'
'i ,/
--
< >• *?
*e»6
4QQ J' p;
j^
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, (tl?)
Radiation ?':C
Sediment
Color
Odor rr*/
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot
Purge Depth
4. Sample Methods
Date -
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth
Splits _
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases ^-- ' ^
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other '•
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
'?• Au6
Well No./Location IAA -i D
SMO No./Fac. No.
1.
I 'A C.
2
2^-. sz Ct-
r Ay 5, . N ''?
O/<-
Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. ^ 3*'..
X 3 =
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, (TI_?>'
Radiation 3..?d
ft.
Sediment \)\f\(L (tf&ftiMf
Color
Odor
'fe
51« r
3. Purge Methods
Date
/" "H
Time: Begin fl/3.5?) End
Personnel J. '- ri '.' S
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot # f"f. •-£(?
Purge Depth tL).p
End
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin M4O
Personnel
End I1QO
Equipment
Lot
Sample Depth -fop cf \tiMM
Splits f/1 /U(/-/1/[
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water (\f\lrf\-
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material .
• Nonaqueous Phases
Off \C\
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other E ! •-» : f- 3 ,- A. ,\->.h_r ^ =•.-> •
PM -f ' 4 1 i'i ' ' : -^- OA''^ < -
-------
Versar
WC
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location <
SMO No./Fac. No.
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
3P,(a ' 4
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point -£
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. /'/. /
X 3 =
JJ
SO
6
End &'/Z'ftC?
4. Sample Methods
Date ft'A3'6 ^
Time: Begin /Vl5o
Personnel
Equipment £
Lot #
Sample Depth Mn
sputs
End
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
Radiation
Sediment —
color /V;!or(
odor orrcna
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin :r -'/ ' ^ End //~\4
Personnel P'; /; < .; / *•/
-------
Versaru
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
End
Well No. /Location />?-/
SMO No./Fac. No. 5MD ,5fin
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
•
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu,
roc..
Radiation
Sediment
color lt\CC(( -toe/Old/
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin |Q) D End
Personnel H
Volume Removed .%? f \fill 0/1
Equipment
Lot
Purge Depth "fop /?f W'Q{?/ fa
4. S^pl. Method.
Date
Time: Begin ty?)D
Personnel H
End
\6lO
Equipment
OvO /X2>
Lot
Sample Depth
Splits faCA I'(
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water firfi/:n/1
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
Other
:u5f'y i i- .5^; > ,*>•
/f .
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg. £
Site Name/Case No. 7~e Mo '.
4. Sample Methods
Date ?/
Time: Begin
Personnel ,
Equipment
Lot
Sample Depth
Splits
End
2.
General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,(TIP)
ft
Radiation
Sediment -—
Color
Odor o./v ac
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin /6
Personnel 01
End Jill
Volume Removed
7
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
•*&-44^ /
T£ MGT.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
M'W
1.
O/<-
Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
'/#
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
Radiation '.-
Sediment^)//]!?/
color nnu tc ac
Odor — •""'
3. Purge Methods
fe'/l'fcfc
Date- _
Time: Begin | JZ-D End
Personnel TlgiM":), M.6V <
Volume Removed
/'Ki ///';/?<
Equipment Dfi i' f
Lot
Purge Depth ICp [])A>g/
WT6
End
4. Sample Methods
Date <3-//-/&
Time: Begin \452-
Personnel f\fll(JS
End
Equipment
Sample Depth fop (MtlT
Splits
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
7 '
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases J
in fil.lfM. ,
j
• Sampling Weather Conditions
.W./7/7/V
Other
-------
-------
Versar-
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No. J~-*>_
Well No./Location £_
SMO No./Fac. No. 5"
End
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
/
V
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin ///*5~
Personnel Pad^eft*.
Equipment
LtL
Sample Depth
Splits
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, (TIP)
ry^
Radiation
Sediment —
Color
Odor Q,/
-^ffc.ve
a
v
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin /a
Personnel fe.^ n
End // //
H-? /"/<•/
Volume Removed //
Equipment
0
Lot
Purge Depth
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
-------
iOBMC.
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
End
S5.-V1.
SMO No./Fac. No.
<3\ t
1. Field Well Measurements V
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
End
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
| Casing Vol.
X3 =
Personnel rw'_^f\^~^~ AV^ Ch iv^ C
Equipment
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
Lot *
Sample Depth J *.
Splits
Notes
• Facility Well Security
/
••/:?
I. i
Radiation
Sediment V
Color /+• J:
v\ -\ - i ^.
Odor O y, I ^
L. v'?) 2~ tW$idig fattha, • Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin ^
Personnel
• Nonagueous Phases
'^tA S
• Sampling Weather Conditions
Other
cJ
Volume Removed /
J
Equipment
Lot
Purge Depth
-------
Versar.
MC.
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Rev. 1: 4/86
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
tField Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner) ^t
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol. 3. 0%
X 3 =
^
/ fr,
Jc OVl
General Observations
W V)€(WK 47; 0 • I
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,TI
Radiation_
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot *
Purge Depth ^' tibOU?
End
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Equipment
Lot
Sample Depth
Splits
5. Notes
• .Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other Cll'i
-h i;
ci
-------
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
End
/3/0 /
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
-) -* n
•X- I ^/ *r^
rf
4. Sample Methods
Date
- H -
Time: Begin
Personnel
Equipment
Lot #
Sample Depth
Splits
Rev. 1: 4/86
End
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
Radiation
Sediment
Color
Odor
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin l.
Personnel ;-^ • •
End
Volume Removed ^ :\'.U t <
Equipment P/2 ' ' f f
Lot *
' /
. /--
Purge Depth
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
• Other
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
Date: Beg.
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 =
WOTt * ^v") o(J ftr
End
f \
4. Sample Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
End
Ut>
?
-------
versar.
MC.
Date: Beg
Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
Rev. 1: 4/86
VERSAR WELL DATA SHEET
End
'<*.Co
1. Field Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Outer Casing Diameter
Casing Height
DTW
Total Depth
Reference Point T^-'P
Water Column Length
Casing Vol.
X 3 = _J
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA,
Radiation
Sediment ^
Color
Odor \
3. Purge Methods
Date
Time: Begin
Personnel
- End r.
Volume Removed
Equipment
Lot
—J
Purge Depth \ G
4. Sample Methods
Date
IP.
Time: Bin
Personnel
Endffj 4.
^^ /At \ -iCh
0
T
Equipment
Lot
Sample Depth \C) fj
Splits
5. Notes
• Facility Well Security
• Disposal of Purge Water
• Dedicated Equipment
• Casing Material
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Sampling Weather Conditions
Other
fa
-------
INC
'SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initi-al
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Vcrsai
we.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
fbr,d
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading >j -'^-j
Performed by P '•'
Temperature (°C) ffi.
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /. /'
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
_
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/OC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Vcrsai
MC
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection /0*3*
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
"3. 5"
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor \>t>~) *?•*
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
RP.
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading {umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/OC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
!•
INC.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
7"-e
-m A
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading C> "8
Performed by /
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /.
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
•
INC.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/crn)
Correction Factor I , I ~7 J2
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
/*7O
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
- Initial
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Versat
MC.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE-DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by A-
Temperature (°C)
17-.C,
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
. QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
•
INC.
-. SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
7e
Well No.
<6
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by pie ('f^. <,
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /. C /
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
'QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cni)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
INC
- - SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date 9>-/ 2,- y (o
Time of Sample Collection ///5~
Time of Reading // ^L O
Performed by ~p )
-------
•
we.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading f 3~l
Performed by /" /e i t<3. ^
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /. //7 jj 2-
V.3 (. O
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
.£_
nitial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Versai
MC
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
G, f
Time of Reading
Performed by^
Temperature (°C) -^
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm) _>< /£)Ls
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Versai
MC
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C) /7.
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /, ', {, 3 ^,
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Of.
- . . Initial
44 /3.J
CD
QA>QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm) 3. 3
-------
Versai
MC.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
T"
Temperature (°C) 2 2. 7
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor ), Q L/ <" '
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
J2£
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading /-3 /$
Performed by *&i
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor I.&IVC
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm) 2..
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Versai
INC
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by x
OfT)
A
>j'
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm) Q
Correction Factor f.Q^? £ 3>
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm) 3>6
Initial
QA/QC
Wfr
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading 5* .' 4^~
•?-'
Performed by JOhfl
"
./
Temperature (°C) H .
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm) -
/,/£ ^^
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm}
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Versai
INC.
- -- SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading UuL
Performed by
7
Temperature (°C)
to
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor , ,&• / '
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm) Up-"«
&S *
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
+o
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor . "*" ' t~
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
/' £""
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
INC.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection /•?
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C) 4
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
OX?
Initial
Well No. /H -
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /./*? ^ $
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/OC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Vcrsai
•
we.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
7
Well No. Aj{ 10
Date
XL
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by P I f_ I
Qfi^C
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm) ,
Correction Factor 1 , 2. ! B.
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Af
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
/ to
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /. 2 ^>3 I
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
fi*
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
*
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Ycrsaiv
SPECIFIC.CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No. M 1 0 D
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by _ L
1 1 li~AS
fn auras.
)5. 7DCs
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor ;.3. ' 5" '
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
AF
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading /f)^~O
Performed by
A
Temperature (°C) /5~- $°C
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor /. QL ! 3 /
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Versjii
INC.
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Tfflifl?
Well No.
-
ft •//'&£
Date
Time of Sample Collection \0 ID
Time of Reading 10 \*~)
Performed by
f[l,lfl5
/
Temperature (°C) l4.Ct°C
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor l,7'2,-' ?
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Date 0"
Time of Sample Collection ^430
Time of Reading lT"3o
Performed by
prip?
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
/.} / 59
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
n Y~
..Initial
-7
?!_;*•
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Versai
MC
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
&'
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading ( ( ''
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm) iM£-*?
Correction Factor /.3 ~?*C 3
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm) .2 ^A-
Initial
QA/OC
Date ff-
Time of Sample Collection / h ID
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C) IL.O°C
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor •'. 2 C1 ^ t
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm) __3 £"9
Initial
QA/QC
Date
Time of Sample Collection
•
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Temperature (°C)
Uncorrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Correction Factor
Corrected Reading (umhos/cm)
Initial
QA/QC
Initial
QA/QC
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Versai
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= *£ &J~ 7= ~~
Sample pH x
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=.
10=
SH
Date
Time of Sample Collection /
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on '
4= 4-_oS~ 7=
Sample pH "7,
pH Recheck 4= V.
Standard
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Versai
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4=
. 7
"7.
7= 7
Sample pH
pH Recheck
Standard
10=
Date
P//J
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by _____
/ J
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on ?
4= If.. 0% 1= ~~
Sample pH "?.
pH Recheck 4=
7. 3
Standard
10=
10=^.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Vcrsai
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by \
i 3 C)
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on X*«-
. / S> i
7= -7*0
Sample pH
/ / I
pH Recheck 4=*3 -1 "3 7= 7- 0
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading (y " j
Performed by
J
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4=
Sample pH
pH Recheck
3.6% 1-^_
n.H
Standard
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Verssai
•
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
site /cfaao
Well No. M. ?>^
Date ^ - 1 Z ~£^7
Time of Sample Collection 'JUC//
Time of Reading c/C^c>-O
Performed by £ 1 £ I -iGS
) 7 ^
Sample Temperature (°C) '
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on / Standard
4= 7= 1.0 10=
Sample pH 7, 3 I7 "^
pH Recheck 4= 7= ^- ^ 10=
Date 7//2/P6
Time of Sample Collection A^-sJ^
Time of Reading /-^ 3o
Performed by l^^et-WS.
r
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) -?/ C^
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on *7 Standard
4= ?. ?^ 7= ?.0 10= /3/£
Sample pH < ^9
pH Recheck 4=^.^ 7= 7^^ 10= /^//
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10 =
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection /<2
Time of Reading /-2
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on f- 9
4= 3. EV 7= 7. +J
Sample pH
9
pH Recheck 4=
7 =
Standard
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
~
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) /Ul
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= J. ?? 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck
7= 7
Standard
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
lample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Versar
pH DATA SHEET
site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by /• (Cf
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on f
4= 7= 7-0
O35T-
Sample pH
. 7
Standard
10=
pH Recheck 4=
7= 7.0
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
J
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on 7- &
7= 7-0
Standard
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=^. 9 7= 7 Q
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
• 10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10 =
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Vcrsai
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
•*._'?..
Rev. 1: 4/86
Site
Well No.
JO
Date
Time of Sample Collection 6/9^^
Time of Reading 07 /7
Performed by £~if J fti <>
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading _
pH Calibration on /
4= 7= ? O
Standard
10=
Sample pH
-6, 9
pH Recheck 4=_
7= 7 Q 10=
Date
ft -
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading _ //
Performed by
/
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on /
4= 0.9
Sample pH _
pH Recheck
7= 7-0
Standard
10=
7= "7-Q
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In.-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10 =
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev.. 1: 4/86
Versaiv
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading lUI t
Performed by
>DIO
In-Situ* Temperature
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
»
pH Calibration on
4= 4.0 7= 1.0
Standard
10=
Sample pH
7.6
pH Recheck 4=_
7= 70
10=
Date
8-lf-K.
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperaturi" (YC)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on /
4= *'-P
7= 7-0
0
Standard
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=4-0 7= 7- 0 10=/Q
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Versai
we.
pH DATA SHEET
*. - I 1 i
Rev. 1: 4/86
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection )/
Time of Reading _f I 3 "3
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= M 7=_
Sample pH 7-3
pH Recheck
Standard
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
prior
smper
In-Situ* Temperature
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
Sample pH
, „
( (Q C^
Standard
10=
7= ?. O 10= fO-I pH Recheck 4= 4"- ( 7=7-d 10=£ f
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Vcrsai
INC.
Rev. 1: 4/86
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Well No. i
Date
-86,
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading Qty3*7
Performed by r'/£/ /.// <:
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) (V\. V6
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 3.? 7= 1 0
Standard
Sample pH
pH Recheck
77
4=3-?
7= 1 O 10= ^f 9
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C>
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= -7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Versai
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
j -1
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C)
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4=5.
Sample pH /.
pH Recheck 4=3
. 9
LO
Standard
10=
10= ?-
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standai
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
Ir.-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10 =
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature <°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Star.dai
10 =
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
[•
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
j. J / 5 i
Rev. 1: 4/86
Site
via
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading _
Performed by A
7
It O,
In-Situ* Temperature'{"C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
II.
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= £] 7= "-?
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
Standard
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standan
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= • 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Star.dar
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Vcrsaiv
pH DATA SHEET
Rev. 1: 4/86
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading //-., B
Performed by /^/ej ^c+
In-Situ* Temperature (°C) /7, 3
Sample Temperature (°C) / o- 3
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on /__
4= 3 .-fa 7= v
Standard
10=
Sample pH
pH Recheck
7, 3
4= \.*T
2. 1= *7
10= 7 73
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standai
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Star.da
10 =
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Vcrsar.
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by /V „
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= H.D 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4
- 4, D
7
Standard
to.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standac
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
• 4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature <°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7 =
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standai
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
•
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
U / -i i.
Rev. 1: 4/86
Site
Well No.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading /3 O
Performed by
Fie »
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on /
4= if 7= -7
S" S~
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
Standard
10=
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
•
INC.
pH DATA SHEET
Site
O
NO.
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading _ /
Performed by F \ «L t fa
±> I -2-
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on ~~7
4= 7= 7
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standai
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7=
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C>
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Samp1e pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Star.da
10 =
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
Rev. 1: 4/86
Versaiv
pH DATA SHEET
Site
he^^c
Well No.
M33
Date
Date 55"
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading _
Performed by u -
X '
^
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading -
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on /
4= tf,d 7= "7^
""7. 0 /
Standard
10=
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4= 7
'.6 ( 7= £. *
?/ 10= /^'/
Sample pH
f ^ pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standac
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standard
10=
10=
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Time of Reading
Performed by
In-Situ* Temperature (°C)
Sample Temperature (°C) _
Initial Sample pH Reading
pH Calibration on
4= 7=
Sample pH
pH Recheck 4=_
7 =
Standar
10=
10=
*If sample is retained for pH measurement
independent of field conditions, in-situ
temperature measurement must still be taken.
-------
sit.
TURBIDITY DATA SHEET
Tf*rtfl.t>
Date
Time
I a it
weii NO.
M /OT>
Performed by ^le/'Wl
Standardised on dilution of
Scale 0-fO
Turbidity of Sample*
&-
/O
NTU
>
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
MTU
NTU
ml
ml
Date
Time
Well No.
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale O
/O
JT
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
JT
m.
t*.
.Pate
Time
Well Mo.
AA fn 8
Performed by
/"V £"
Standardized on dilution of
Scale &
Turbidity of Sample*..
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Satfple volume taken for
dilution
NTU
JJTU
NTU
ml
ml
Date
Time
/f06
Well No.
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale O
/OO
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. .Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution •
m
m
*For turbidity above 40 NTU use the formula:
Turbidity of Sample =
-------
TURBIDITY DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time
Well No.
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale O'bl
0" \
NTU
Turbidity of Sample* 0-1 \1TLL
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
NTU
ml
ml
Date
Time
Well No. Ml OS
Performed by
Standardized.on dilution of
Scale C' tOO
Turbidity of Sample* J&O AJTU ^
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample }f3 ^
B. Volume of dilution water
C.
Sample volume taken for
dilution
<\0
10
Q420
No.
irmed
lardi
1
MR! AS
bv L/r/iAtr>x
zed on dilution of /O
O • in
NTU
.dity of Sample* ^00
Scale
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
ml
ml
'Date _
Time
Well No. M3&
04 26*
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale 0>r
/&
Turbidity of Sample*
X/7Z-C.
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
.£?
vy
/
*For turbidity above 40 NTU use the formula;
Turbidity of Sample =
-------
TURBIDITY DATA SHEET
Site
Date
Time
Well No.
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale 0- IOQ
0- / OO NTU
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
Date
Time
+O
NTU
ml
ml
Well No. J*J*-
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale
NTU
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
NTU
ml
ml
Date
Time
•i
1 L u'O
Well No.
Performed bv f\l\\(}5
Standardized on dilution of C" ''CO N^
Scale _2:
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
/
m.
m
•Date
Time
•kd-
gt.
Well No.
- j*' —
^5^r
Performed by
Standardized on Dilution of
Scale
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
"7. /
N
IT
*
'
*For turbidity above 40 NTU use the formula:
Ax(B+C)
Turbidity of Sample =
-------
Vcrsar
TURBIDITY DATA SHEET
Site
Time
Well No.
Xtf-
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale
NTU
Turbidity of Sample*
• '
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
NTU
ml
ml
Date >
Time &9/SL
Well No. SM /<9
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale
/ S&
Nl
Turbidity of Sample* /«$""
-------
Vcrsat
5 CtfK p(
MC
of
TURBDYJJATAJ^
Sit*
Date
Tin*
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale
Turbidity of Sample*
4'7
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
t]0
No. M
06
NTU
NTU
ml
ml
I2J1
Date
Time
Well No.
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of 0,
Scale O - tO
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
Date
Time
Well No.
M-
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale O
Turbidity of Sample*.
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. Turbidity of diluted sample
E. Volume of dilution water
C. Sa*ple volume ti^en for
dilution
NTU
NTU
ml
ml
Date
Time
Well No.
Performed by
Standardized on dilution of
Scale 0-10°
Turbidity of Sample*
For Turbidities above 40 NTU:
A. -Turbidity of diluted sample
B. Volume of dilution water
C. Sample volume taken for
dilution
*For turbidity above 40 NTU use the formula:
Turbidity of Sample * ——*•
-------
APPENDIX E
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
Date of Static Water Level
Well neasurement CFeet Above fl.S.L.3
H-1 12/8/86 5203.8
3/11/87 5203.7
6/8/87 5210.0
3/14/87 5210.3
12/14/87 5211.3
H-2 12/8/86 5181.4
3/11/87 5180.7
6/8/87 5180.3
3/14/87 5180.0
12/14/87 5173.8
n-3 12/8/86 5185.7
3/11/87 5186.1
6/8/87 5186.6
3/14/87 5186.3
12/14/87 5186.1
H-4 12/8/86 5186.5
3/11/87 5186.6
6/8/87 5186.5
3/14/87 5185.3
12/14/87 5186.1
M-6a 3/11/87 5153.8
6/8/87 5153.3
12/14/87 5152.8
M-6b 12/8/86 5157.1
3/11/87 5157.1
6/8/87 5157.6
3/14/87 5156.7
12/14/87 ' 5156.7
H-7s 12/3/86 5120.3
3/3/87 5120.8
6/8/87 5121.0
3/14/87 5121.3
12/14/87 5121.4
f1-7d -12/3/86 5121.0
3/3/87 5121.2
6/8/87 5121.3
3/14/87 5121.6
12/14/87 5121.8
M-Bs 12/30/86 5121.8
3/3/87 5122.3
6/8/87 5122.3
3/14/87 5124.3
12/14/87 5123.8
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
Date of Static Water Level
Well Measurement CFeet Above fl.S.L.D
n-l 1S/B/BB 5203.8
3/11/87 5303.7
6/8/87 5210.0
3/14/87 5210.3
12/14/87 5211.3
M-2 12/8/86 5181.4
3/11/87 5180.7
6/8/87 5180.3
3/14/87 5180.0
12/14/87 5173.8
M-3 12/8/86 5185.7
3/11/87 5186.1
6/8/87 5186.6
3/14/87 5186.3
12/14/87 5186.1
M-4 12/8/86 5186.5
3/11/87 5186.6
6/8/87 5186.5
3/14/87 5185.3
12/14/87 5186.1
H-6a 3/11/87 5153.8
6/8/87 5153.3
12/14/87 5152.8
f1-6b 12/8/86 5157.1
3/11/87 5157.1
6/8/87 5157.6
3/14/87 5156.7
12/14/87 • 5156.7
n-7s 12/3/86 5120.3
3/3/87 5120.8
6/8/87 5121.0
3/14/87 5121.3
12/14/87 5121.4
M-7d '12/3/86 5121.0
3/3/87 5121.2
6/8/87 5121.3
3/14/87 5121.6
12/14/87 5121.8
n-Bs 12/30/86 5121.8
3/3/87 5122.3
6/8/87 5122.3
3/14/87 5124.3
12/14/87 5123.8
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACD REFINERY CCONT.D
Date of Static Water Level
Well Heasurement CFeet Above fl.S.L.)
M-8sa 12/30/8B - - 5120.3
3/3/87 5121.8
6/8/87 5122.2
3/14/87 5123.7
12/14/87 5123.2
n-8d 12/30/86 5113.6
3/3/87 5113.8
6/8/87 5120.1
3/14/87 5120.6
12/14/87 5120.7
n-3s 12/30/86 5125.3
3/3/87 5123.3
B/8/87 5127.3
3/14/87 5125.3
12/14/87 5124.3
n-3d 12/30/86 5121.6
3/3/87 5120.8
6/8/87 5122.0
3/14/87 5122.3
12/14/87 5122.2
n-10s 12/30/86 " ' 5120.5
3/3/87 5120.8
6/8/87 5121.3
3/14/87 5122.3
12/14/87 5121.8
n-10m 12/30/86 5113.3
3/3/87 5113.6
6/8/87 5120.0
3/14/87 ' 5121.1
12/14/87 5120.7
H-lOd 12/30/86 5113.0
3/3/87 5118.3
6/8/87 5113.6
3/14/87 5120.7
12/14/87 5120.3
n-lls 12/30/86 5127.2
3/3/87 5124.0
6/8/87 5128.5
3/14/87 5126.8
12/14/87 5125.7
H-lld 12/30/86 5121.3
3/3/87 5120.7
6/8/87 5121.8
3/14/87 5122.8
12/14/87 5122.0
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY CCONT.D
Well
n-lEs
n-i4s
n-14d
n-is
n-iB
n-i?
n-18d
Date of
Measurement
IE/10/86
3/11/87
B/8/87
9/14/87
12/14/87
IE/30/86
3/S/B7
6/8/87
3/14/87
IE/14/87
IE/30/86
3/9/87
6/8/87
9/14/87
IS/14/87
IE/30/86
3/9/87
6/8/87
9/14/87
IE/14/87
IE/3/86
3/9/87
6/8/87
9/14/87
IS/14/87
IE/3/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
9/14/87
IE/14/87
IS/30/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/07
IS/9/86
3/9/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
Static Water Level
CFeet Above M.S.L.)
5077.7
5077.7
5076.9
5077.5
5077.6
5119.8
51S0.4
51S0.6
5121.6
5121.6
5117.7
5117.9
5118.E
5118.7
5118.9
5118.4
5118.6
5118.9
5119.3
5113.4
5117.1
5117.E
5117.5
5117.3
5118.0
5117.1
5117.4
. 5117.6
5118.0
5118.E
5112.1
5113.2
5113.6
5114.7
5114.7
5106.2
5107.0
5107.0
5108.6
5105.4
-------
TABLE AH STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY CCONT.)
Date of Static Water Level
Well Measurement CFeet Above M.S.L.3
M-19 12/3/86- • 5114.4 •"
3/9/87 5114.9
B/B/87 5115.4
9/14/87 5115.8
IE/14/87 5116.E
M-EO IE/9/86 5120.8
3/9/B7 5121.0
6/8/87 5121.S
9/14/87 5121.6
IE/14/87 5121.7
1-21 IE/30/86 5119.3
3/9/87 5120'.1
6/8/87 51E0.3
3/14/87 51SO.B
12/14/87 5121.0
M-SE 12/9/86 51E0.4
3/9/87 51EO.B
6/8/87 5120.8
9/14/87 5121.0
12/14/87 5121.2
M-23 12/3/86 ~ 5117 6
3/9/87 5117.6
6/8/87 5117.5
9/14/87 5117.6
12/14/87 5117.8
M-E4 12/9/86 5113.7
3/3/B7 5120.0
6/8/87 51SO.E
9/14/87 ' 51E0.6
12/14/87 5119.8
M-E5 12/9/86 5114 3
3/3/87 5114.5
6/8/87 5114.3
3/14/87 5114.3
12/14/87 5114.B
M-26 IE/13/86 5097.7
3/3/87 5098.5
6/8/87 5098.1
3/14/87 5096.8
IS/14/87 5097.3
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY CCONT.D
Date of Static Water Level
Well Measurement CFeet Above M.S.L.D
M-E7 12/3/86 5109.S
3/3/B7 . 5103.5
6/8/87 5103.6
3/14/87 5110.S
12/14/87 5103.7
h-E3 12/3/BB 5118.1
3/3/87 5118.4
6/8/87 5118.7
9/14/87 5113.1
1S/14/B7 5113.4
M-30 12/9/BB 5034.7
3/3/87 5035.3
6/8/87 5034.5
3/14/87 5033.6
IE/14/87 5034.6
n-31s 12/9/86 5118.7
3/3/87 5113.1
6/8/87 5113.3
3/14/87 5113.8
IS/14/87 51EO.O
M-31m 12/9/86 " ' 5118.4
3/3/87 5118.6
6/8/87 5118.3
3/14/87 5113.3
IE/14/87 DAMAGED
M-3S 12/9/86 5033.5
3/3/87 5033.3
6/8/87 . 5033.E
3/14/87 5092.5
IE/14/87 5033.4
M-33 12/9/BB 5086.0
3/3/87 5086.6
6/8/87 5086.4
9/14/87 5085.6
IS/14/87 5085.3
M-34 12/9/86 5118.7
3/3/87 5118.3
6/8/87 5113.1
3/14/87 5113.5
IE/14/87 5113.7
M-35 1S/30/86 5112.9
3/3/87 5113.0
6/8/87 5113.3
9/14/87 5113.5
IS/14/87 5114.0
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY CCDNT.)
Well
n-36
n-37
n-43A
n-50Ad
n-51As
n-51Am
n-51Ad
SP-1
Date of
Measurement
12/30/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
IE/30/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/30/85
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/3/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/30/86 '
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/3/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
9/14/87
12/14/87
12/3/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/11/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
Static Water Level
CFeet Above n.S.L.D
5120.3
5120.0
5120.7
5120.8
5120.6
5103.6
5110.4
5110.4
5111.4
5112.0
5124.8
5123.4
5125.7
5126.1
5125.0
5113.4
5120.1
5120.4
5122.3
5121.8
5114.7
5115.2
5115.2
5115.6
5116.0
5115.3
5116.5
5116.6
• 5117.0
5117.E
5114.6
5115.E
5115.2
5115.7
5116.0
5111.8
5112.0
5112.0
5111 .3
5112.1
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY CCDNT.)
Date of Static Water Level
Well Measurement CFeet Above n.S.L.D
SP-2 12/11/86 5037.3
3/11/B7 - 5037.S
6/8/87 5037.7
3/14/87 5038.0
1S/14/B7 5038.4
SP-3 IS/10/86 ' 5105.6
3/11/87 5105.8
6/8/87 5105.7
3/14/87 5105.7
12/14/87 DAMAGED
SP-4 12/10/86 5103.3
3/11/87 5103.5
6/8/87 DAMAGED
SP-4A 6/17/87 5102.7
3/14/87 5102.7
12/14/87 DAMAGED
SP-5 12/10/86 5077.1
3/11/87 5077.1
6/8/87 5076.5
3/14/87 " 5077.0
12/14/87 5077.0
SP-7 12/10/86 5077.1
3/11/87 5077.1
6/8/87 5076.5
3/14/87 5077.0
12/14/87 5075.7
SP-8 12/10/86 ' 5076.9
3/11/87 5077.0
6/8/87 5076.4
3/14/87 5076.8
12/14/87 5076.8
SP-3 12/10/86 5076.3
3/11/87 5076.3
6/8/87 5076.4
3/14/87 5076.8
12/14/87 5076.7
SP-10 12/10/86 5077.4
3/11/87 5077.3
6/8/87 5076.7
3/14/87 5077.2
12/14/87 5077.2
-------
TABLE Al: STATIC WATER LEUELS, CASPER TEXACO REFINERY
Well
SP-23
SP-24
SP-25
SP-26
SP-27
SP-28
SP-53
SP-30
Date of
neasurement
12/10/86
3/11/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/3/86
3/3/87
6/8/87
9/14/87
12/14/87
12/10/86
3/11/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/10/86
3/11/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/10/86
3/11/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/10/86
3/11/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/10/86
3/11/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
12/10/86
3/11/87
6/8/87
3/14/87
12/14/87
Static Water Level
CFeet Above n.S.L.)
5075.7
5075.3
5075.7
5075.6
5075.6
5073.2
5073.6
5073.3
5073.1
5078.3
5076.7
DRY
5076.1
DAHAGED
5077.3
5077.2
5076.5
5077.2
5075.7
5077.4
DRY
5076.7
5077.4
DRY
5076.7
5076.8
5076.3
5076.6
' 5076.5
5075.6
5075.8
5075.7
5075.5
5075.5
5076.5
5076.6
5076.2
5076.4
5076.3
-------
APPENDIX F
-------
N
— .— EXTENT OF UPPERMOST AQUIFER
' I.
TOC ISO-CONCENTRATION LINE
.i!;!| ;:..:. '
''"ll ' ' .
$!' '••'' • "
-------
ii.'j
JUNE 1985 '.''
''.'I
PHENOL ISO-CONCENTRATION
LINE (mg/L) .(»:!'.., •', .
FIGURE 8
FIVE - YEAR • TREND IN
PHENOL CONCENTRATIONS,!. '?'
UPPERMOST AQUIFER, TEXACO . ..;,
t\ • . i *. i / I I
CASPER REFINERYJi'NORTHMPROp!ERTO»j
JUNE 1986
-------
SULFIOE ISO-CONCENTRATION
LINE (ma/L) ifl-i; . i.i^
'it) '• :'
FIGURE .9
FIVE-YEAR. TREND IN
SULFIDE CONCENTRATIONS,
UPPERMOST AQUIFER, TEXACO
-------
PBOPfHTY *OUMOAttr<
JUNE 1984
TCXACO PROPCHTY 80t/*OA*Y L
EXPLANATION"]'
— — —EXTENT OF UPPERMOST AQUIFER
100
AMMONIA ISO-CONCENTRATION
LINE (mg/U 01 N) ll''"
FIGURE; IO <
F IVE - YEAR'^'jREND IN U/
AMMONIA CONCENTRATIONSi'1',
UPPERMOST AQUIFER,' TEXACO;
' CASPER REFINERYj|[^'ORT'H;ir!!PROP,,E|R,
-------
APPENDIX G
-------
Environmental Programs Office
1050 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 120, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
(702) 734-3200
November 10, 1986
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency »>i\
Office of Solid Waste ^
401 M. Street SW HOV 1 U
Washington, D.C. 20460
Attention: Mr. Anthony Montrone
Via: C.F. Hoover C-p-f"/
Subject: The Assessment of the Usability of the Data
Generated for Site 34, Texaco, WY
Dear Mr. Montrone:
Enclosed are the inorganic and organic data usability audit
reports, and the quality control data evaluation report for
Texaco, WY. This report is prepared for the Ground-Water
Monitoring Task Force (GWMTF).
This report will be distributed to the members of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Ground-Water Monitoring
Task Force and their designees.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate
to call. I can be reached at FTS 545-3144.
Very truly yours,
Smith
Senior Associate Scientist
Laboratory Performance Monitoring
Gr'Au-p-'-'
EWS:meo
cc: Ms. Barbara Elkus Mr. John Moore
Dr. Paul Friedman J.O. 70.21
Mr. Richard Steimle 8410
Mr. Ken Partymiller WP-0863C
Mr. Gareth Pearson •
Regional Representatives
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LIST OF TABLES iii
LIST OF ACRONYMS v
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 Sample Information 1-1
2.0 EVALUATION MEASURES OF QC DATA 2-1
2.1 Accuracy 2-1
2.2 Precision 2-1
2.3 Blank Contamination 2-2
2.4 Reported Detection Limits . . . ; 2-2
\
3.0 RESULTS OF LABORATORY QC DATA EVALUATION 3-1
3.1 Metals \. 3-1
3.1.1 Accuracy \ 3-1
3.1.2 Precision \ 3-1
3.1.3 Completeness \ 3-1
3.1.4 Blank Contamination 3-1
3.1.5 Reported Detection Limits 3-2
3.2 Inorganic and Indicator Parameters 3-2
3.2.1 Accuracy 3-2
3.2.2 Precision 3-2
3.2.3 Completeness 3-2
3.2.4 Blank Contamination 3-2
3.2.5 Reported Detection Limits 3-3
-------
Table of Contents - continued
PAGE
3.3 Organics 3-3
3.3.1 Accuracy 3-3
3.3.2 Precision 3-4
3.3.3 Completeness 3-4
3.3.4 Blank Contamination 3-4
3.3.5 Reported Method Detection Limits 3-4
4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4-1
4.1 Metals 4-1
4.2 Inorganic and Indicator Parameters 4-1
4.3 Organics 4-1
4 ,'3r: 1- Volatiles by purge and trap Data Quality. . .' . . 4-1
1 4.3.2 Se:r.ivolatile Data Quality 4-2
4.3.3 Pesticide Data Quality 4-2
Appendix 1 Contract Required Detection Limits and Instrument
Detection Limits for Metals, Inorganic, and
Indicator Parameters Al-1
Appendix 2 Summary of Concentrations for Compounds Found in Ground-
Water Samples at Texaco, WY A2-1
-------
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
2-la Accuracy Goals for Inorganic and Indicator Analyses
Matrix Spike Recovery 2-3
2-lb Accuracy Goals for Inorganic and Indicator Analyses
Calibration Verification Recovery 2-4
2-lc Accuracy Goals for Inorganic and Indicator Analyses
Laboratory Control Sample Recovery 2-5
2-2 Accuracy Goals for Organic Surrogates and Matrix Spikes
Recovery in Water Samples 2-6
2-3 Program Precision Goals for Inorganic and Indicator Analyses 2-7
2-4 Program Precision Goals for Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike
Duplicate Analyses 2-8
2-5 Program Goals for Precision by Surrogate Compound Fraction . 2-9
3-la Accuracy Performance by Matrix Spike Recovery for Total
Metals in Low Concentration Samples 3-5
3-lb Accuracy Performance by Matrix Spike Recovery for Total
Metals in Medium Concentration Samples •.../". 3-6
3-2a Low Concentration Samples with Spike Recoveries Outside
of Program DQO Limits for Total Metals 3-7
3-2b Medium Concentration Samples with Spike Recoveries Outside
of Program DQO Limits for Total Metals 3-8
3-3a Precision Performance for Total Metal Parameters in
Low Concentration Samples 3-9
3-3b Precision Performance for Total Metal Parameters in
Medium Concentration Samples 3-10
3-4a Accuracy Performance by Matrix Spike Recovery for
Inorganic and Indicator Parameters in
Low Concentration Samples 3-11
3-4b Accuracy Performance by Matrix Spike Recovery for
Inorganic and Indicator Parameters in
Medium Concentration Samples 3-12
3-5a Precision Performance for Inorganic and Indicator Parameters
in Low Concentration Samples 3-13
3-5b Precision Performance for Inorganic and Indicator
Parameters in Medium Concentration Samples 3-14
3-6 Accuracy Performance for Matrix Spike Compounds in
Low Concentration Samples 3-15
111
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
TABLE EAPJI
3-7 a Accuracy Performance for Surrogate Spike Compounds
in Low Concentration Samples 3-16
3-7b Accuracy Performance for Surrogate Spike Compounds
in Medium Concentration Samples 3-17
3-7c Accuracy Performance for Surrogate Spike Compounds
in Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Samples 3-18
3-7d Accuracy Performance for Surrogate Spike Compounds
in the Sampling Blanks 3-19
3-8 Precision Performance for Matrix Spike Compounds
in Low Concentration Samples 3-20
3-9 Precision Performance for Surrogate Compounds in Matrix
Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Low Concentration Samples. . 3-22
Al-1 Contract Required Detection Limits and Instrument
Detection Limits for Metals, Inorganic, and
Indicator Parameters Al-2
A2-1 Summary of Concentrations for-Hazardous Substances List
Compounds, Indicator Parameters and Metals Detected
in Ground-Water, and Sampling Blank Samples
at Texaco, WY A2-2
IV
-------
LIST OF ACRONYMS
SNA Base/Neutral/Acid Fractions
CCS Contract Compliance Screening
CLP Contract Laboratory Program
CRDL Contract Required Detection Limit
DL Detection Limit
DQO Data Quality Objective
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
IDL Instrument Detection Limit
LCS Laboratory Control Sample
PE Performance Evaluation
POC Purgeable Organic Carbon
POX Purgeable Organic Halide
QC Quality Control
RPD Relative Percent Difference
SMO Sample Management Office
TOG Total Organic Carbon
TOX Total Organic Halide
VOA . Volatile Organic Analysis
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Hazardous
Ground-Water Task Force is investigating 58 commercial land
disposal facilities. The goal of the Task Force is to determine
the extent of leakage of hazardous wastes (organic and inorganic)
into the ground water.
The purpose of this report is twofold. It evaluates the accuracy
and precision of the data generated by the laboratory, and also
assesses the usability of the data (i.e., suspect, qualitative,
semi-quantitative, or quantitative) as an indication of the level
of contamination at the site.
1.1 Sample Information
A total of 25 samples were collected at Texaco, WY. The following
EPA numbers were assigned: (inorganics/organies)
MQ0582/Q0582-MQ0600/Q0600, and MQ0801/Q0801-MQ0806/Q0806. The
laboratory was not required to analyze a performance evaluation
(PE) sample for this case.
The traffic reports identified duplicates, blanks, and sample
locations; there are 5 sampling blanks and one set of duplicates.
The duplicates and blanks are nutHbered as follows: '
SAMPLING BLANK INORG. NO. ORG. NO.
field MQ0587 Q0587
equipment MQ0594 Q0594
equipment MQ0595 Q0595
equipment MQ0600 Q0600
trip MQ0582 Q0582
dup-well M36 MQ0588 Q0588
dup-well M36 MQ0590 Q0590
According to the traffic reports, there are 6 medium concentration
samples. MQ0596/Q0596, MQ0599/Q0599 and MQ0804/Q0804 are medium
concentration groundwater samples. MQ0802/Q0802, MQ0803/Q0803, and
MQ0805/Q0805 are medium concentration surface water samples. All
other samples are low concentration ground water.
1-1
-------
2.0 EVALUATION MEASURES OF QC DATA
Accuracy, precision, blank contamination and detection limits are
examined to insure compliance of laboratory procedures with the
contract requirements and good laboratory practices.
2.1 Accuracy
The accuracy of the analytical methods is determined by the percent
recovery of spiked compounds into the samples. Inorganic samples
are spiked with known concentrations of analytes. Organic samples
are spiked with known concentrations of surrogate compounds. The
percent recovery of the spiked compound is calculated as:
C% R) Recovery = Observed concentrati on x 100
True concentration
N.B.: for inorganic samples,
Observed cone. = spikes sample cone. - sample cone.
In addition to the matrix spike recovery, the accuracy of the
inorganic analysis is measured by the recovery of the calibration
verification and the laboratory control samples. The accuracy,
presented as %R ± standard deviation, must meet program data
quality objectives (DQO) as outlined in Tables 2-la, Ib, Ic, and
2-2.
2.2 Precision
The precision of the inorganic analyses is determined by the
relative percent difference (RPD) of each analyte in duplicate
samples. The organic method, in comparison, uses matrix spike
duplicates and surrogates in the matrix spikes to determine the
RPD. The RPD is calculated as:
RPD
D1 -
x 100
-------
LEMSCO has calculated the RPDs for the surrogate compounds in the
matrix spike duplicates because the laboratory is not required to
perform this task.
2.3 Blank Contamination
Laboratory and sample blank contamination is reported on Form III,
for inorganic data, and Form IV for organic data; the level of
contamination must adhere to the contract conditions. If the
contract limits are exceeded, the sample data must also be examined
for the contamination and evaluated accordingly.
2.4 Reported -Detection Limits
The estimated method detection limits, for organic analysis, are
directly proportional to the concentration/dilution factor of the
sample and the contract required detection limit (CRDL). If the
dilution--factor is greater-than 10, the CRDLs are multiplied by -10"
which will raise the detection level. The new estimated method
detection limit may result in false negatives for some analytes.
The analytes may be present but not observed due to excessive
dilutions. Any changes in the instrument detection limits (IDL),
for inorganic analysis, due to dilution of a sample will be
reflected in the reported sample result.
2-2
-------
TABLE 2-la ACCURACY GOALS FOR INORGANIC AND INDICATOR ANALYSES
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY
Method or Parameter Accuracy. %
Atomic Absorption method 75-125
Inductively Coupled Plasma method 75-125
Cyanide 75-125
Sulfate 80-120
pH 90-110
Total Organic Halide (TOX) 80-120
Purgeable Organic Halide (POX) 80-120
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 80-120
Purgeable Organic Carbon (POC) 80-120
Chloride 90-110
Nitrate Nitrogen 90-110
Ammonia Nitrogen _ 90-110
Phenol 80-120
(a) Source: Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force Facility Assessment
Program, Quality Assurance Plan.
2-3
-------
TABLE 2-lb ACCURACY GOALS FOR INORGANIC AND INDICATOR ANALYSES<
CALIBRATION VERIFICATION RECOVERY
Method or Parameter Accuracy, %
Atomic Absorption method 90-110
Inductively Coupled Plasma method 90-110
Mercury 80-120
Cyanide 85-115
Sulfate 80-120
pH 90-110
Total Organic Halide (TOX) 80-120
Purgeable Organic Halide (POX) 80-120
Total Organic Carbon (TOO 80-120
Purgeable Organic Carbon (POC) . 80-120
Chloride 90-110
Nitrate Nitrogen .. 90-110
Ammonia Nitrogen , 90-110
Phenol 80-120
(a) Source: Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force Facility Assessment
Program, Quality Assurance Plan.
2-4
-------
TABLE 2-lc ACCURACY GOALS FOR INORGANIC AND INDICATOR ANALYSES(
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
Method or Parameter Accuracy. %
Atomic Absorption method 80-120
Inductively Coupled Plasma method 80-120
Cyanide 80-120
Sulfate 80-120
PH 90-110
Total Organic Halide (TOX) 80-120
Purgeable Organic Halide (POX) 80-120
Total Organic Carbon (TOO 80-120
Purgeable Organic Carbon (POC) 80-120
Chloride 90-110
Nitrate Nitrogen 90-110
Ammonia Nitrogen . ^ 90-110
Phenol 80-120
(a) Source: Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force Facility Assessment
Program, Quality Assurance Plan.
2-5
-------
TABLE 2-2 ACCURACY GOALS FOR ORGANIC SURROGATES AND
MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY IN WATER SAMPLES
Fraction
VOA
-------
TABLE 2-3 PROGRAM PRECISION GOALS FOR
INORGANIC AND INDICATOR ANALYSES(a>
Average RPD(b>
Method or Parameter Limits.±%
Atomic Absorption method 20
Inductively Coupled Plasma method 20
Cyanide 20
Sulfate 20
pH ' 10
Total Organic Halide (TOX) 20
Purgeable Organic Halide (POX) 20
Total Organic Carbon (TOG) 10
Purgeable Organic Carbon (POC) 10
Chloride 10
Nitrate Nitrogen 40
Ammonia Nitrogen .. 10
Phenol 20
(a) Source: Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force Facility Assessment
Program, Quality Assurance Plan
(b) Relative percent difference.
2-7
-------
TABLE 2-4 PROGRAM PRECISION GOALS FOR
MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE ANALYSES
Average RPD(b)
Fraction Compound Limits. £%>.
1,1-Dichloroethene 14
VOA Trichloroethene 14
VOA Chlorobenzene 13
VOA Toluene 13
VOA Benzene 11
B/N^d) 1i2,4-Trichlorobenzene 28
B/N Acenaphthene 31
B/N 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 38
B/N Pyrene 31
B/N N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 38
B/N 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 28
Acid Pentachlorophenol 50
Acid Phenol 42
Acid 2-Chlorophenol 40
Acid 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 42
Acid 4-Nitrophenol 50
Pest.^6) Lindane 15
Pest. Heptachlor 20
Pest. Aldrin 22
Pest. Dieldrin 18
Pest. Endrin 21
Pest. 4-4'DDT 27
(a) Source: Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force Facility Assessment
Program, Quality Assurance Plan.
(b) Relative percent difference.
(c) Volatile organics.
(d) Base/neutrals.
(e) Pesticides.
2-8
-------
TABLE 2-5 PROGRAM GOALS FOR PRECISION
BY SURROGATE COMPOUND FRACTION (a)
Average RPD(b>
Fraction Limits. ±E
Volatile Organics 15
Base/Neutrals 50
Acids 40
Pesticides 30
(a) Source: Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force Facility Assessment
Program, Quality Assurance Plan
(b) Relative percent difference.
2-9
-------
3.0 RESULTS OF LABORATORY QC DATA EVALUATION
3.1 Metals
3.1.1 Accuracy
Tables 3-la and 3-lb summarize the accuracy performance for the
metals based on the sample spike recoveries. Twenty-one of the
23 total metal parameters for the medium concentration samples
are within the DQOs. Twenty of the twenty three total metal
parameters for low concentration samples are within DQOs. Two
of the spike recoveries were not required to be calculated
because the sample results were greater than four times the
spike added. Tables 3-2a and 3-2b list the matrix spiked
samples and the metal parameters with individual sample spike
recoveries outside the DQOs (Table 2-la-c).
All reported laboratory control sample recoveries and
calibration verification standard recoveries are within Program
DQOs.
3.1.2 Precision
Tables 3-3a and 3-3b summarize the precision performance for
the duplicate metal analyses. Twenty one of the twenty three
average RPDs for low concentration samples are within the
DQOs. All of the average RPDs for medium concentration samples
are within the DQOs. Noncalculable metal parameter RPDs were
reported for twenty six percent of the low concentration and
sixty five percent of the medium concentration samples. Values
were noncalculable because either one or both of the duplicate
values were less than the CRDL.
3.1.3 Completeness
The metal analyses were completed on all samples submitted to
the laboratory. •
3.1.4 Blank Contamination
No contamination was reported for laboratory blanks but
contamination was found in the sampling blanks. The
contaminants and their concentrations are listed as follows:
3-1
-------
Contaminant Concentration (uR/1) Blank Sample ID
Al 389 MQ0600
Fe 107 MQ0107
3.1.5 Reported Detection Limits
The reported DL is the IDL or a factor of the IDL for each
metal parameter. A raised IDL can be caused by the sample
dilution.
3.2 Inorganic and Indicator Parameters
3.2.1 Accuracy
Tables 3-4a and 3-4b summarize the accuracy performance for
inorganic and indicator parameters based on the sample spike
recoveries. Except for cyanide in the low concentration
samples, all average percent recoveries are within the accuracy
DQOs. Accuracy DQOs have not been established for bromide and
nitrite.
Laboratory control sample and calibration verification standard
recoveries reported for all these analyses are within the
program DQOs except for three continuing calibration
verifications '(CCVs) for NH3-nitrogen analysis.
3.2.2 Precision
Tables 3-5a and 3-5b provide a summary of precision performance
for inorganic and indicator parameters. Average RPDs for all
parameters are within DQOs. Precision DQOs have not been
established for bromide and nitrite. For noncalculable RPDs,
the sample value and/or the duplicate value were less than CRDL.
3.2.3 Completeness
Inorganic and indicator parameter analyses were performed on
all samples as requested. Analyses were performed for bromide
and nitrite on all samples, even though they were not required
according to some of the traffic reports. These analyses were
added by a contract modification.
3.2.4 Blank Contamination
Laboratory blank contamination was not reported but
contamination was found in the sampling blanks. The
contaminants and their concentrations are listed as follows:
3-2
-------
Contaminant Concentration (ug/1) Blank Sample ID
Phenol
Phenol"
Phenol
Phenol
TOO
TOG
TOG
86
43
16
41
2200
1300
3900
MQ0582
MQ0594
MQ0595
MQ0600
MQ0582
MQ0595
MQ0600
3.2.5 Reported Detection Limits
The reported DL is the IDL or a factor of the IDL for each
inorganic and indicator parameters. A raised IDL can be caused
by the sample dilution. Contract required detection limits
have not been established for bromide and nitrite.
3.3 Organies
3.3.1 Accuracy
3.3.1.1 Matrix Spike Recoveries
Table 3-6 summarizes accuracy performance for matrix spike
compounds in the samples. This table provides an estimate of
the accuracy achieved for these compounds (average percent
recovery, standard deviation and range). Eight of twenty-two
average matrix spike recoveries from the low concentration
samples do not meet the DQO limits (Table 2-2).
Individual matrix spike recoveries which are outside accuracy
DQOs are summarized in the Organic Data Usability Audit Report.
3.3.1.2 Surrogate Recoveries
Tables 3-7a thru 3-7d summarize average accuracy performance
for recovery of surrogate spike compounds including matrix
spike and matrix spike duplicates. All average percent
recoveries are within DQO limits (Table 2-2).
Individual surrogate spike recoveries which are outside
accuracy DQOs are summarized in the Organic Data Usability
Audit Report.
3-3
-------
3.3.2 Precision
3.3.2.1 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates
Table 3-8 summarizes precision performance based on matrix
spike/matrix spike duplicate analyses for this case. All the
average RPDs are inside the DQOs established for the program.
Individual matrix spike RPDs which are outside precision DQOs
are summarized in the Organic Data Usability Audit Report.
3.3.2.2 Surrogate Spikes
Surrogate spike recoveries from matrix spike/matrix spike
duplicates were used to calculate surrogate RPDs for comparison
with Program DQOs (Table 2-5). Table 3-9 summarizes precision
performance based on duplicate surrogate recoveries. Average
surrogate spike RPDs for this case met the DQOs for this
Program.
3.3.3 Completeness
The required organic analyses were performed on all the samples
submitted to the laboratory for this case.
3.3.4 Blank Contamination
A summary of the laboratory blank contamination is reported in
the Organic Data Usability Audit Reports.
3.3.5 Reported Detection Limits
The method detection limits reported by the laboratory
(reported as a value followed by a "U" on Form I for each
parameter) were compared to the CRDL.
A summary of the method detection limits is reported in the
Organic Data Usability Audit Report.
3-4
-------
TABLE 3-la
ACCURACY PERFORMANCE BY MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY
FOR TOTAL METALS IN LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Parameter
Total Metals
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
No. of
Observations
1
1
1
1*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
No. of %R
Calculated
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Average Std. Dev. Range
Recovery. % Recovery, % Recovery.%
4*
84
102
98
92
78
96
95
91
96
74*
103
88
98
90
98
96
93
100
— — — — — __
111 — • —
100
58*
— not applicable
* outside DQO
3-5
-------
TABLE 3-lb
ACCURACY PERFORMANCE BY MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY
FOR TOTAL METALS IN MEDIUM CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Parameter
Dissolved
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
No. of
Observations
Metals
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
No. of %R
Calculated
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Average Std. Dev. Range
Recovery, % Recovery, % Recovery, %
96
. 109
103
92
88
124
80
92
88
89
89
112
69*
72*
100
90
88
118
96
— — — — _—
88
93
94
— not applicable
* outside DQO
3-6
-------
TABLE 3-2a
LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES WITH MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES OUTSIDE
OF PROGRAM DQO LIMITS FOR TOTAL METALS
Spiked Samples
Metal MQ0588 MQ0589
Aluminum T
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium -
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium -
Cobalt
Copper
Iron T
Lead
Magnesium -
Manganese -
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium -
Selenium
Silver -
Sodium NR
Thallium
Vanadium -
Zinc T
T Total Metal, outside DQO.
- Spike recovery within DQO (90-110%)
NR not calculated (sample result > 4x spike)
3-7
-------
TABLE 3-2b
MEDIUM CONCENTRATION SAMPLES WITH MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES OUTSIDE
OF PROGRAM DQO LIMITS FOR TOTAL METALS
Spiked Samples
Metal MQ0803 MQ0504
Aluminum -
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium -
Calcium -
Chromium -
Cobalt
Copper -
Iron
Lead
Magnesium T
Manganese T
Mercury . -
Nickel
Potassium -
Selenium -
Silver
Sodium NR
Thallium
Vanadium -
Zinc -
T Total Metal, outside DQO.
- Spike recovery within DQO (90-110%)
NR not calculated (sample result > 4x spike)
3-8
-------
TABLE 3-3a
PRECISION PERFORMANCE FOR TOTAL METAL PARAMETERS
IN LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Parameters
Total Metals
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
No. of No. RPD Average Std. Dev.
Observations Calc. RPD. % RPD. %
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 •
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
85*
7
18
11
— — .-.-,
4
13
13
—
10
3
4
8
— — — —
4
6
4
__
2
— — — —
3
40*
Range
RPD, %
__
^ im
__._
__
M _
— —
_____
__
_L n
—
—" not applicable
* outside DQO
3-9
-------
TABLE 3-3b
PRECISION PERFORMANCE FOR TOTAL METAL PARAMETERS
IN MEDIUM CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Parameters
Total Metals
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
No. of No. RPD Average Std. Dev.
Observations Calc. RPD, % RPD, %
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1 10
o
1 10
0
0
1 2 —
0
o
0
1 " 6
0
1 4
1 2
0
Q
1 2 —
0
0
1 1 —
0
o
o
Range
RPD, %
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
...
—
—
—
—
—
•
—
_—
not applicable
outside DQO
3-10
-------
TABLE 3-4a
ACCURACY PERFORMANCE BY MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY
FOR INORGANIC AND INDICATOR PARAMETER IN LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Number of No. of %R
Parameter Observations Calculated
POC
POX
TOC
TOX
Total phenols
Ammonia nitrogen
Nitrate nitrogen
Sulfate
Chloride
Cyanide
Bromide
Nitrite nitrogen
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Average
Recovery, %
91
88
98
100
89
110
110
100
98
0*
110
102
Std. Dev. Range
Recovery. 7. Recovery, %
— —
— —
— —
—
—
—
— —
— —
—
—
__ __
not applicable
* outside DQO
3-11
-------
TABLE 3-4b
ACCURACY PERFORMANCE BY MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY
FOR INORGANIC AND INDICATOR PARAMETERS IN MEDIUM CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Number of No. of %R Average Std. Dev. Range
Parameter Observations Calculated Recovery. % Recovery. % Recovery. %
POC
POX
TOG
TOX
Total phenols
Ammonia nitrogen
Nitrate nitrogen
Sulfate
Chloride
Cyanide
Bromide
Nitrite nitrogen
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
92
103
93
98
89
115
104
90
102
93
97
102
— —
— —
— _ __
— —
— —
—
• —
— — __
_- . —
—
— —
not applicable
* outside DQO
3-12
-------
TABLE 3-5a
PRECISION PERFORMANCE FOR INORGANIC
AND INDICATOR PARAMETERS IN LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Number of No. of %R
Parameter Observations Calculated
POC
POX
TOG
TOX
Total phenols
Ammonia nitrogen
Nitrate nitrogen
Sulfate
Chloride
Cyanide
Bromide
Nitrite nitrogen
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
Average
RPD
_ _
—
1
—
15
9
—
A
0
—
5
~
Std. Dev. Range
RPD RPD
__ .....
— —
—
—
— —
— —
—
— —
—
—
—
_
not applicable
* outside DQO
3-13
-------
TABLE 3-5b
PRECISION PERFORMANCE FOR INORGANIC AND
INDICATOR PARAMETERS IN MEDIUM CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Number of No. of %R
Parameter Observations Calculated
POC
POX
TOC
TOX
Total phenols
Ammonia nitrogen
Nitrate nitrogen
Sulfate
Chloride
Cyanide
Bromide
Nitrite nitrogen
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
0
0
•1
1
0
1
0
Average
RPD
18
—
0
7
7
—
—
1
0
—
0
— —
Std. Dev. Range
RPD RPD
__
—
— —
—
—
—
—
— —
— —
—
— —
— — — — •
not applicable
* outside DQO
3-14
-------
TABLE 3-6 ACCURACY PERFORMANCE FOR MATRIX
SPIKE COMPOUNDS IN LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Pairs of Average Std. Dev.
Matrix Spike Compound Observations Recovery, % Recovery, %
Volatiles
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Toluene
Benzene
Base/Neutrals
1,2, 4-Trichlorobenzene
Acenaphthene
2 , 4-Dinitrotoluene
Pyrene
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
Acid Fraction
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pesticides
Lindane
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Dieldrin
Endrin
4,4' -DDT
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
110.8
101.2
103.2
95.8
99.2
37.8*
38.5*
26.5
63.
36.8*
37.8
..
13.8
17.
35.8
32.5
ft ^i
37.5*
43.5
45.
44.5*
53. *
30.5*
4.5
3.6
3.8
3.1
3.9
43.7
42.8
30.9
74.4
42.5
44.1
16.7
20.4
41.6
37.5
10.4
43.3
50.2
52.
51.4
61.2
35.2
Range
Recovery, %
-
107-117
96-104
98-107
93-100
97-105
0-105
0- 79
0- 58
0-145
0- 76
0- 84
0- 34
0- 41
0- 78
0- 66
0- 22
0- 77
0- 88
0- 91
0- 90
0-107
0- 62
(a) no range both values are identical
— not applicable
* outside DQO
3-15
-------
TABLE 3-7a ACCURACY PERFORMANCE FOR SURROGATE SPIKE COMPOUNDS
IN LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Surrogate
Spike Compound
Volatiles
Average
Recovery. %
Std. Dev.
Recovery, %
Range
Recovery, 7.
Toluene D8 98.4 (14) (a) 6.2 90-108
4-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 101.2 (14) 5. 94-112
1,2-Dichloroethane D4 98.2 (14) 4. 92-106
Base/Neutrals
Nitrobenzene D5 64.9 (15) 29.4 0- 94
2-Fluorobiphenyl 69.5 (15) 31.5 0-102
Terphenyl D14 77.9 (15) 37.1 0-132
Pyrene D10 (optional) 77.4 (15) 30.1 0-132
Acid Fraction
Phenol D5 24.1 (15) 16.7 0- *S
2-Fluorophenol 33.1 (15) 22.7 0-64
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 55.5 (15) 36.2 0- 92
Pesticide
Dibutylchlorendate 60.3 (14) 37.6 0-128
(a) analyses per compound in parentheses.
* outside DQO
not applicable
3-16
-------
TABLE 3-7b ACCURACY PERFORMANCE FOR SURROGATE SPIKE COMPOUNDS
IN MEDIUM CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Surrogate Average Std. Dev. Range
Spike Compound Recovery. % Recovery. % Recovery,
Volatiles
Toluene D8 101. (6) (a) 6.6 93-110
4-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 100. (6) 4.8 96-106
1,2-Dichloroethane D4 97.3 (6) 8.3 87-108
Base/Neutrals
Nitrobenzene D5 54.2 (6) 43. 0-92
2-Fluorobiphenyl 56.7 (6) 45.2 0-106
Terphenyl D14 59.7 (6) 46.7 0-101
Pyrene D10 (optional) 62. (6) 48. 0-101
Acid Fraction
Phenol D5 25. (6) 21.3 0- 48
2-Fluorophenol 34.3 (6) 29.4 0-66
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 62.8 (6) 49.2 0-108
Pesticide
Dibutylchlorendate 82. (6) 36.4 21-117
(a) analyses per compound in parentheses.
* outside DQO
- not applicable
3-17
-------
TABLE 3-7c ACCURACY PERFORMANCE FOR SURROGATE SPIKE COMPOUNDS
IN MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
Surrogate
Spike Compound
Average
Recovery, %
Std. Dev.
Recovery, %
Range
Recovery, %
Volatiles
Toluene D8 99.8 (4) (a) 2.5 96-101
4-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 101. (4) 7.8 94-110
1,2-Dichloroethane D4 101.5 (4) 5.2 96-108
Base/Neutrals
Nitrobenzene D5 40.2 (4) 46.5 0- 82
2-Fluorobiphenyl 44.2 (4) 51.2 0-92
Terphenyl D14 62.5 (4) 72.5 0-134
Pyrene D10 (optional) 66.2 (4) 78.1 0-152
Acid Fraction
Phenol D5 20.5 (4) 23.8 0- 44
2-Fluorophenol 27. (4) 31.4 0- 59
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 35.5 (4) -41.1 0- 74
Pesticide
Dibutylchlorendate 44.8 (4) 50. 0-90
(a) analyses per compound in parentheses.
* outside DQO
not applicable
3-18
-------
TABLE 3-7d ACCURACY PERFORMANCE FOR SURROGATE SPIKE COMPOUNDS
IN THE SAMPLING BLANKS
Surrogate
Spike Compound
Average
Recovery. X
Std. Dev.
Recovery. X
Range
Recovery.%
Volatiles
Toluene D8
4-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
1,2-Dichloroethane D4
Base/Neutrals
Nitrobenzene D5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Terphenyl D14
Pyrene D10 (optional)
Acid Fraction
97.2 (5) (a)
100. (5)
94. (5)
64.6 (5)
73.4 (5)
80.8 (5)
78. (5)
6.
2.5
4.1
9.9
17.1
18.
16.7
91-106
97-103
91-101
53- 75
55- 97
60-103
58- 98
Phenol D5
2-Fluorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Pesticide
Dlbutylchlorendate
35.2 (5)
52.8 (5)
73.4 (5)
74.4 (5)
9.5
9.4
19.
4.4
25- 47
42- 62
52-101
67- 78
(a) analyses per compound in parentheses.
* outside DQO
not applicable
3-19
-------
TABLE 3-8 PRECISION PERFORMANCE FOR MATRIX SPIKE COMPOUNDS
IN LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Matrix Pairs of Average Std. Dev.
Spike Compound Observations RPD.H RPD, T,
Volatiles
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Toluene
Benzene
Base/Neutrals
1,2, 4-Trichlorobenzene
Acenaphthene
2 , 4-Dinitrotoluene
Pyrene
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
Acid Fraction
Pentachl o ropheno 1
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
4 -Chloro- 3 -me thy Ipheno 1
4-Nitrophenol
Pesticides
Lindane
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Dieldrin
Endrin
4, 4 '-DDT
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5.8
4.5
4.4
4.7
4.5
4.6 •
6.6
9.4
15.1
3.4
11 . 2
23.6
20.6
9.1
1.5
37.5
2.7
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.6
4.4
3.6
2.2
3.6
4.9
6.6
9.3
13.3
21.3
4.8
15.9
33.4
29.1
12.8
2.2
53.0
3.8
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.3
2.3
Range
RPD, %
2.7-8.9
1.9-7.
2.8-5.9
2.1-7.2
1. -7.9
0-9.3
0-13 . 2
0-18.9
0-30.2
0-6.8
0-22.5
0-47.3
0-41.2
0-18 . 2
0-3.1
0-75
0-5.3
0-2.3
0-2.2
0-2.2
0-1.9
0- 3.3
— not applicable
(a) both values are identical
* outside DQO
3-20
-------
TABLE 3-9 PRECISION PERFORMANCE FOR SURROGATE COMPOUNDS
IN MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE LOW CONCENTRATION SAMPLES
Surrogate Compound
Pairs of Average Std. Dev. Range
Observations RPD.% RPD. % RPD. %
Volatiles
Toluene D8
4-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
1,2-Dichloroethane D4
Base/Neutrals
Nitrobenzene D5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Terphenyl D14
Pyrene D10 (optional)
cid Fraction
Phenol D5
2-Fluorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Pesticide
Dibutylchlorendate
2
2
2
2
2
2
2..
2
2
2
2.5
2.8
3.9
1.9
4.
7.2
14.7
7.3
9.2
4.2
2.3
3.6 0-5.1
2.5 1.0-4.6
1.2 3.1-4.7
2.6
5.6
10.2
20.8
10.3
13.1
6.
3.2
0-3.7
0-8.
0-14.4
0-29.4
0-14.6
0-18.5
0-8.4
0-4.5
(a) no range, both values are identical.
— not applicable
* outside DQO
3-21
-------
A.0 CONCLUSIONS
A.I Metals
The average percent recoveries for total metals are within the
program accuracy DQOs in 87% of the low concentration samples and,
91% of the medium concentration samples. The average RPDs are
within the program precision DQOs in 91% of the low concentration
and 100% of the medium concentration samples for the total metals.
No laboratory blank contamination was reported. Al and Fe
contamination was found in the sampling blanks. Analyses met the
completeness goals.
For data usability evaluation, see the Inorganic Data Usability
Audit Report. All evaluation criteria used for the total metals
are based on IFB WA 84-J092 (SOW 785).
A.2 Inorganic and Indicator Parameters
The average percent recoveries for the inorganic and indicator
parameters are within the program accuracy DQOs in 92% of the low
concentration and 100% of the medium concentration samples. All
the inorganic and indicator parameters are within precision DQOs.
No laboratory blank contamination was reported. However, phenol
and TOC contamination was found in the sampling blank. Analyses
met the completeness goal.
For data usability evaluation, see the Inorganic Data Usability
Audit Report. All evaluation criteria used for CN are based on IFB
WA 84-J092 (SOW 785).
4.3 Organics
The organic analysis met the accuracy DQOs established for the
program, except 8 of 22 average % recoveries of matrix spike
compounds. All the precision DQOs were met; the average RPDs for
both matrix spike and surrogate compounds are within the DQOs for
the program.
4.3.1 Volatiles by purge and trap data quality
The analysis of these compounds can be considered quantitative
with a few exceptions. The detected compounds in samples
Q0588, Q0590, Q0596, and Q0599 are judged semiquantitative.
The high dilutions of the samples may have resulted in false
negatives. The usability parameters are acceptable. For data
usability evaluation, see the Organic Data Usability Audit
Report.
4-1
-------
4.3.2 Semivolatile Data Quality
The semivolatile analysis is judged quantitative for 18 of 25
samples. However, all detected compounds in samples Q0586,
Q0591, Q0596, Q0588, Q0590, Q0599, and Q0804 are considered
semiquantitative with the possibility of false negatives.
Samples Q0588, Q0590, Q0599, and Q0804 are considered suspect
because of unusable QC surrogate data and matrix spike data.
For data usability evaluation, see the Organic Data Usability
Audit Report.
4.3.3 Pesticide Data Quality
The pesticide analysis is judged suspect due to high
dilutions, poor matrix spike and surrogate spike recoveries,
problems with dibutylchlorendate shifts and unaddressed peaks
in the chromatograms.
For data usability evaluation, see the Organic Data Usability
Audit Report.
4-2
-------
APPENDIX 1
Contract Required Detection Limits and
Instrument Detection Limits for Metals,
Inorganic, and Indicator Parameters
Al-1
-------
TABLE Al-1
CONTRACT REQUIRED DETECTION LIMITS AND INSTRUMENT
DETECTION LIMITS FOR METALS, INORGANIC, AND INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Parameter
Metals
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Inorganic and Indicators
Ammonia nitrogen
Bromide
Chloride
Cyanide
Nitrate nitrogen
Nitrite nitrogen
POC
POX
Sulfate
TOG
TOX
Total Phenols
CRDL
200
60
10
200
5
5
5000
10
50
25
100
5
5000
15
0.2
40
5000
5"
10
5000
10
50
20 .
100
1000
10
300
10
5
1000
1000
5
10
IDL
100
3
6
4
4
0.5
93
8
16
12
10
2
238
3
0.2
20
2160
3
10
156
5
21
12
100
50
1000
300
50
100
5
500
1000
5
10
concentrations are in
Al-2
-------
ORGANIC DATA USABILITY AUDIT REPORT
WP-0864C
DRAFT
NOV101965
Laboratory:
Contpuchem
Total Number of Samples 59
Case; 6299/SAS/1944HO Site Number: 34 Texaco. WY Contract Number: 68-01-7263
Data User: GWMTF Region: 8 Date Audited: 11-5-36
Date Received at EMSL/LV: 11/9. 12. and 15/86
Date Reviewed:
11-7-86
REPORT SUMMARY
The following is the auditors assessment of Data Quality of this case
pertaining to:
A. Volatiles by Purge and Trap:
B. Semivolatiles:
NOV 1 2 1986
Division
C. Pesticide:
Quantitative
Semiquantitative for the detected
compounds in samples Q0588, Q0590, /
Q0596 and Q0599 with the
possibility of false negatives.
Quantitative
Semiquantitative for the detected
compounds in Q0586, Q0591 and
Q0596 with the possibility of
false negatives.
Suspect for samples Q0588, Q0590,
Q0599, and Q0804 due to the lack
of QC surrogate data, matrix spike
data and the possibility of false
negatives. The detected compounds
would be semi-quantitative in
these samples.
Suspect
Initial Audit by:
Reviewed by:
D.L. Bogen
E.W. Smith
Senior Associate Scientists
D.C. Pudvah
Senior Scientist
Laboratory Performance Monitoring Group
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Company
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Tel: (702) 798-3143 (FTS) 545-3143
-------
SAMPLE NUMBER
MATRIX
Q0582
Q0583
Q0584
Q0585
Q0585RE
Q0586
Q0587
Q0588
Q0590
Q0589
Q0591
Q0592
Q0593
Q0594
Q0595
Q0596
Q0597
Q0598
Q0599
Q0600
Q0801
Q0802
Q0803
Q0804
Q0805
Q0806
Q0588MS
Q0588MSD
Q0806MS
Q0806MSD
CD860805B11
CBS60815All
CD860812C12
CB860817B12
CB860818B12
CC860819A12
CC860818C12
CB860817B11
CB860818A11
CC860819B11
CE860815C12
CBS60816All
96414-B
96826-B
97441-B
97144-B
97193-B
97141-B
trip blank
low concentration ground water - well Ml
low concentration ground water - well M6
low concentration ground water - well M10S
low concentration ground water - well M10S
low concentration ground water - well M10D
field blank
low concentration ground water - well M36 Duplicate
low concentration ground water - well M36 Duplicate
low concentration ground water - well M35
low concentration ground water - well M51AS
low concentration ground water - well M33
low concentration ground water - well SP7
equipment blank
equipment blank
medium concentration ground water - well SS19
low concentration ground water - well M12S
low concentration ground water - well SS34
medium concentration ground water - well SS49
equipment blank
low concentration ground water - well SS7
medium concentration surface water - inlet pond
medium concentration surface water - alluvial pond
medium concentration ground water - well SS4
medium concentration surface watef- PCS coke pond
low concentration ground water - well 41A
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
instrument blank
method blank
method blank
method blank
method blank
method blank
method blank
-------
SAMPLE NUMBER MATRIX
GH096781 method blank
GH09358 method blank
GH09592 method blank
G2J96781 method blank
GH098522 method blank
GH096851 method blank
GH097150 method blank
GH097397 method blank
GH096416 method blank
GH096358 method blank
GH097427 method blank
-------
•-•A. Volatile* by Purge and Trap Data Quality
Comoleteness
1. Sample Data
2. Standard Data
3. Raw Data
Quality Control
1. P.E. Study
2. Initial Calibration
a) Response Factors
b) % RSD
3. Continuing Calibration
a) Response Factors
b) % Diff.
c) Frequency
A. Tuning and Mass Cal.
a) Ion Abundance
b) Frequency
5. Blanks
a) CRDL Limit
b) Frequency
6. Matrix Spike/Spike Dup.
a) RPD
b) % Recovery
c) Frequency
7. Surrogate Spikes
a) % Recovery
b) Frequency
8. Holding Time
9. Contract Compliance
10. Chromatograms
NA
X
Acceptable
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
' X
X
X
X
X
X
• x
X
X
Unacceptable
Parameter;
Affected
. Impact*
On Data
Conrnent #'(s)
Al, A4
A2
A3
Usability Summary
[x] 1. Quantitative
[x] 2. Semi-Quantitative for the detected compounds in samples Q0588, Q0590, Q0596, and Q0599 with
the possibility of false negatives.
[ ] 3. Qualitative
C ] 4. Suspect
C ] 5. Unusable
* Categories 1 thru 4 may also be used to reflect the impact on QC sections above
-------
Comments/Conclusions
Al The estimated method detection limit is the CRDL times the concentration/dilution factor. For the
volatile analyses, the estimated method detection limits are the CROLs with the following
exceptions.
Sample Cone./Oil. Factor Estimated Method PL
Q0587 2. 2. x CRDL
Q0588 25. 25. x CROL
Q0590 22.7 22.7 x CROL
Q0594 2. 2. x CROL
Q0596 10. 10. x CROL
QQ599 45.4 45.4 x CROL
Q0801 9.1 9.1 x CRDL
Q0804 6. 6. x CRDL
The high dilutions of samples Q0588, Q0590, Q0596, and Q0599 may result in false negatives.
A2 A PE sample was not required to be analyzed with this case.
A3 Hethylene chloride (2.3 J) and acetone (3.5 J) contamination was found in instrument blank
CB860818B12 at levels below the CRDLs. There is no impact on the data. J is an estimated value
(see p. A2-2).
A4 Samples Q0588 and Q0590 were screened by the laboratory for the volatile analyses and determined
to be medium concentration. ,The roedjum levels do not correspond to the sample concentrations
' '" supplied on the traffic reports.
-------
B. Semivolatiles Data Quality
1 Sample Data
2. standard Data
3. Raw Data
Quality Control
1. P.E. Study
2. Initial Calibration
a) Response Factors
b) ft RSD
3. Continuing Calibration
a) Response Factors
b) % Diff.
c) Frequency
4. Tuning and Mass Cal.
a) Ion Abundance
b) Frequency
5. Blanks
a) CRDL Limit
b) Frequency • <- ' ' '
6. Matrix Spike/Spike Dup.
a) RPD
b) ft Recovery
c) Frequency
7. Surrogate Spikes
a) % Recovery
b) Frequency
8. Holding Time
9. Contract Compliance
10. Chromatograms
MA
X
Acceptable
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Unacceptable
•- k • i H. .
X
X
X
X
Parameters
Affected
HSD
00588HS/
Impact*
On Data Comme.
1
! Bl
1
1
I
i
1
1
!
1 B2
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1 83
!
i
1
1 86
I
1
1
1
1 84
1
1
1 85
1
1
1
1
Usability Summary
[x] 1.
[x] 2. Semi -Quantitative for the detected compounds in samples Q0586, Q0591, and Q0596 with the
possibility of false negatives.
[ 3 3. Qualitative
[xj 4. Suspect for samples Q0588, Q0590, Q0599, and Q0804 due to the lack of QC surrogate data, matrix
spike data and the possibility of false negatives. The detected compounds would be
semi-quantitative in these samples.
[ 3 5. Unusable
* Categories 1 thru 4 may also be used to reflect the impact on QC sections above
-------
Comments/Cone1 us i ons
Bl The .estimated method detection limits for the semivolatile analyses are-2 times the CRDLs with the1
following exceptions.
Sample Cone./Oil. Factor Estimated Method PL
Q0585 8 8 x CRDL
Q0586 20 20 x CROL
Q0588 1000 1000 x CROL
Q0590 800 800 X CROL
Q0591 20 20 x CRDL
Q0596 20 20 x CRDL
Q0599 20 20 x CROL
Q0804 40 40 x CROL
These high dilutions may result in false negatives.
B2 A PE sample was not required to be analyzed with this case.
83 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate contamination was found in method blank GH096358C22 (2.4 yg/1) at a
concentration below the CRDL of 20 pg/1. There is no impact on the data.
84 Semivolatile surrogate compounds were not recovered from samples Q0599, Q0804, QQ590, Q0588, Q0588MS
and Q0588HSD. These samples were diluted 20 to 1000 times; therefore the surrogate QC data for
these samples are unavailable.
85 The holding time for Q0588MS/HSD was exceeded due to laboratory error. See the Case Narrative for
the laboratory's explanation.
86 Semivolatile matrix spike compounds were not recovered from Q0588HS and Q0588HSD due to the 1000
fold dilution of the sample. This matrix spike QC data are unavailable. For Q0806HSD, the average
% recovery of pyrene, 145%, exceeded the QC limits of 26-127. The RPD of 4-nitrophenol for samples
Q0806MS/MSD, 75, was greater than the QC limit of 50.
-------
c.
icide Data Quality
Completeness
1. Sample Data
2. Standard Data
3. Raw Data
Quality Control
1. P.E. Study
2. Initial Calibration
a) Calib. Factors
b) % RSD
c) Eval. Frequency
3. Continuing Calibration
a) Calib. Factors
b) % Diff.
c) Eval. Frequency
4. Tuning and Mass Cal.
a) Ion Abundance
b) Frequency
5. Blanks
a) CRDL Limit
b) Frequency
6. Matrix Spike/Spike Dup.
a) RPO
b) % Recovery
c) Frequency
7. Surrogate Spikes
a) % Recovery
b) Frequency
8. Holding Time
9, Contract Compliance
10. Chromatograms
NA
X
X
x
Acceptable
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Unacceptable
X
X
x
X
Parameters
Affected
-
HSD
00588 MS/
'
Impact*
On Data
Conroent #'(s)
C1
C8
C2
C4
C5
C3
C6,C7,C8,C9
C7, C9
Usability Summary
[ ] 1. Quantitative
[ ] 2. Semi-Quantitative
[ ] 3. Qualitative
[x] 4. Suspect
[ ] 5. Unusable
* Categories 1 thru 4 may also be used to reflect the impact on QC sections above
-------
Comronts/Conclus i ons
C1 The estimated method detection limits for the pesticide analyses are the CRDLs-with the following"
exceptions.
Sample Cone./Oil. Factor Estimated Method PL
Q0585
Q0588
Q0590
Q0591
Q0596
Q0598
Q0802
Q0804
10
20
20
2
2
2
2
2
10 x CRDL
20 x CRDL
20 x CRDL
2 X CROL
2 x CRDL
2 x CROL
2 x CROL
2 x CRDL
The high dilutions of samples Q0585, Q0588, and Q0590 may result in false negatives.
C2 A PE sample was not required to be analyzed with this case.
C3 The holding time for sample Q0588MS/MSD was not met due to laboratory error. See the Case Narrative
for the laboratory's explanation.
C4 The pesticide matrix spike compounds were not recovered from samples Q0588HS/MSD due to high
dilutions. This QC data are unavailable.
C5 Dibutyl chlorendate was not recovered from samples Q0585, Q0588, and Q0590 due to high dilutions
after surrogate addition; therefore the surrogate QC data for these samples are unavailable. Also
the pesticide surrogate % recovery of sample Q0599 (21%) did not meet the QC limits of 24-154.
C6 In the case narrative the laboratory indicates that a fluorisil cleanup column was only used on six
samples. The RCRA contract requires that fluorisil cleanup be used for every pesticide sample (see
Statement of Work for SAS/1944/HQ).
C7 a) The dibutyl chlorendate shift was found using Eva! Mix C instead of Eval Mix A as required.
(Exhibit E, p. Ala). The 72 hour sequence begins with Eval Mix A, Eval B, and then Eval C.
b) Samples Q0805, Q0804, Q0591, and Q0585 had a retention time shift greater than the 2S difference
criteria.
c)The dibutylchlorendate peak, surrogate spike compound was not present in the pesticide
chromatograms for samples Q0590, Q0588, and Q0598.
C8 The Standards Summary (Form IX) was not submitted for either column associated with samples Q0588,
Q0590, and Q0582 on August 18, 1986.
C9 Aldrin may be present in sample Q0590.
-------
WP-0860C
INORGANIC DATA USABILITY AUDIT REPORT
Laboratory: Centec
Case: 1944 HO-M
Data User: GWMTF
QC Number:
Region:
93
Total Number of Santples:
Contract Number: 1944 HO
Site Number:
Site: Texaco
25
34
Date Received at EMSL/LV: 10 / 24 / 86
Date Submitted by Lab: 10 / 22 / 86
DATA "QUALITY-SUMMARY --- —^
Date Audited: 11 / 01 / 86
Date Reviewed:—11-/ 07 / 86
A. Graphite Furnace AA Analysis: Sb and Tl with exceptions, As, Cd, Pb, and
Se are quantitative.
B. ICP Analysis: Fe, Al, and Zn with exceptions, Ba, Be, Ca, Cr, Co Cu, Fe,
Mg, Mn, Ni, K, Ag, Na, and V are quantitative.
C. Hg Analysis: Quantitative
D. CN~ Analysis: Low cone, samples are unusable with exceptions. Medium
cone, samples are quantitative.
E. 1C Analysis: N03 and N02 with exceptions, S04, Cl~, and
Br~ are quantitative.
F. Ammonia Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
G. Phenol Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
H. TOG Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
I. POC Analysis: Suspect
J. TOX Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
K. POX Analysis: Semi-quantitative.
NOTE: Usability is determined from guidelines laid out in the "Inorganic Data
Validation SOP" written by D.K. White, May 14, 1985.
DRAFT
Initial Audit by:
Reviewed by:
M.E. Balogh
Scientist
Keith Aleckson
Senior Scientist
Laboratory Performance Monitoring Group
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Co.
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Tel: (702) 798-3143 (FTS) 545-3143
-------
Summary of Samples (EPA Sample ID Number/Matrix)
MQ0582
/ LW-G
MQ0583
/ LW-L
HQ0584
/ LW-G
MQ0585
/ LW-G
KQ0586
LW-G
MQ0587
/ LW-G
HQ0588
LW-G
MQ0589
/ LW-G
MQ0590
/ LW-G
M00591
/ LW-G
MQ0592
LW-G
PQOS93
/ LW-G
,"100594
/ LW-G
;-'.Q0595
M00596
/ HW-G
MQ0597
/ LW-G
M00598
HQ0599
MQ0600
M00801
H00802
MQ0803
M00804
MQ0805
H00806
* oily high organic vapor
** high organic vapor
Analysis required:
x Metals (Total 4 Dissolved)
x Cyanide x TOC
x Nitrate x POC
x Ammonia x TOX
x Phenol x POX
x Chlorida x Sulfate
/ LW-G
KW-G*
/ LW-G
LW-G
MW-S
MW-S
/ KW-G**
HW-S
LW-G
Matrix
LW - Low Water
LS - Low Soil
PW - PE Water
KW - Medium Water
MS - Medium Soil
PS - P6 Soil
PC - PE Cyanide PB - PE Blank
FB - Field Blank TB - Trip Blank
EB - Equipment Blank
Type
S - Surface
G - Ground
L - Leachate
H - Mixed media
-------
A. Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
N/A
'
_
'
.
-•
X
Acceptable
1
-
X
X
X
X
X
- X
X
X
X
X
X
X
t
X
Unacceptable
X
X
X
Impact on-
Oata
"
I
Comments
A4
*.
A1
A2
A3
alitv Control
. Initial Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Source
. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Frequency
b. Recoveries
t. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
I. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. Analytical Spikes
,7. MSA
3. LCS
• a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
9. P.E. Study
!0. Holding Time
M. Contract Compliance
12. Interference
Jsability Summary
[;<] a.' Quantitative: Sb and Tl with exceptions, As, Cd, Pb, and Se.
L ] b. Se:ni-Quantitative:
[x] c. Qualitative: Pb result for MQ0588 and Sb result for HQ0586.
[ ] d. Suspect:
[x] e. Unusable: Pb result for MQ0596 and the Sb result for HQOS91.
-------
B. Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy ICP Analysis
Quality Control
1. Initial Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Frequency
b. Recoveries
3. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. LCS
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
7. Serial Dilution
8. P.E. Study
9. Holding Time
10. Interference
11. Contract Compliance
Usability Summary
[x] a. Quantitative: Fe («W), Al (MW), In (HW), 8a, Be, Ca, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, «g, Mn, Ni, K, Ag, Ma,
and V.
[x] b. Semi-Quantitative: Fe (LW) with an exception.
[x] c. Qualitative: Zn (LW), Fe results for KQ0583 and WJ0586.
[ ] d. Suspect:
[x] e. Unusable: Al (LW), Fe result for KQ0803.
N/A
x
Acceptable
x
x
x
x
x
x
x "
x
x
x
V
>»
X
X
Unacceptable
... .. . .,...
x
x
X
Impact on
Data
...
Comments
Bl, B5
B2
86
84
-------
Comments/Cone1 us ? ons
Bl The. following laboratory duplicate result is outside the contract control limit for precision.
(
Parameter Samole ID Level/Matrix SI S2 % RPD Abs. Diff. CRDL Impact on Data
Al MQ0588
B2 The following spike
Parameter Sample
LW 3330 1380 85 —
recoveries are outside the contract limits.
ID Level /Matrix % R Impact on Data
200
Al KQ0588 LW 4 Unusable
Fe MQ0588 LW 74 Semi quantitative, slightly low bias
In MQ0588 LW 58 Qualitative, low bias
B3 The following low level linear range checks were found to have poor recoveries.
Date Range Cone, of the Next Impact
of
Run
10/16
10/18
10/16
10/18
10/17
10/18
Parameter
Be
Be
Cr
Cu
Ag
Ag
Check
Cone.
10
10
20
50
20
20
-
I
20
100
65
90
65
100
% R f
10
50
95
5
80
65
Highest Verf. Std.
With Acceptable Resultsyg/1
527
527
529
524
495
495
on
Data
low bias
low bias
low bias
low bias
low bias
low bias
Samples
Affected
All
All
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
B4
(1) = H00582, HQ0583, MQ0584, HQ0585, HQ0586, HQ0587, HQ0589, MQ0590, MQ0591, HQ0592, MQ0593,
MQ0594, HQ0595, MQ0596, HQ0597, HQ0599, MQ0600, MQ0598, and MQ0801.
(2) = MQ0588, HQ0802, MQ0803, HQ0804, MQ0805, and HQ0806.
The low level linear range check is an analysis of a solution with elemental concentrations near
the detection limit. This range check analysis shows the accuracy that can be expected for sample
results near the detection limits.
The high concentrations of sulfate do not appear to effect Ba analyses. Both the ICS and spike
recoveries for Ba are acceptable.
35 The following field duplicate Absolute Difference is not within acceptable limits:
CRDL
Parameter Sample ID Matrix
Zn MQ0588/MQ0590 LW
20
Abs. Diff.
86
This result was not used for data usability determination as requested.
-------
B6 The following equipment blanks are above the contract required detection limit (CROL):
Parameter CRDL Equipment Blank H00600
Al 200 389 . ..., .
Fe 100 107
Sample data less than the IDL or greater than 10 times the highest field blank are considered
quantitative. Data at or greater than 4 to 5 times the highest field blank contamination are
considered qualitative. All other data are considered unusable. Fe results MQ0583 and MQ0586 are
considered qualitative. The Fe results for HQ0583 is considered unusable. The remaining samples
are quantitative.
-------
Quality Control
1. Initial Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Frequency
b. Recoveries
3. .Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. P.E. Study
7. Holding Time
8. Contract Compliance
Usability Summary
[x] a. Quantitative:
[ ] b. Semi-Quantitative:
[ ] c. Qualitative:
[ ] d. Suspect:
[ 3 e. Unusable:
C. Mercury Analysis
Impact on
N/A Acceptable Unacceptable Data
Comments
Cofnnents/Conclusions
-------
0. Cyanide Analysis -
N/A
Impact on
Acceptable Unacceptable Data
Garments
(LW) = 0
D1
litv Control
Initial Cal. Verification
. Recoveries
. Source
Continuing Cal. Verification
. Recoveries
. Frequency
Duplicates
.. Percent or
Absolute Difference
i. Frequency
Spikes
u Recoveries
,». Frequency
Blanks
i. Heats CRDl Limit
j. Frequency
. LCS .
.. P.E. Study
. Holding Time
. Contract Compliance
ability Surrmary
'] a. Quantitative: MQC802-WQ0805, MQ0599.
] b. Semi-Quantitative:
] c. Qualitative: MQ0585, KQ0586, MQ0552, HQ0592, MQ0593, and MQ0597.
] d. Suspect:
] e. Unusable: with exceptions
•nments/Concl us i ons
The low water spike recovery (sample HQ0588) is outside the contract limit with a % R = 0. This
renders the low water data unusable. Those low concentrations samples with results above the
detaction limit may be qualitative but biased very low.
-------
WP-0860C
INORGANIC DATA USABILITY AUDIT REPORT
Laboratory: Centec
Case: 1944 HQ-M
Data User: GWMTF
QC Number:
Region:
93
Total Number of Samples:
Contract Number: 1944 HO
Site Number: 34
Site: Texaco
25
Date Received at EMSL/LV: 10 / 24 / 86
Date Submitted by Lab: 10 / 22 / 86
DATA'QUALITY"SUMMARY --
Date Audited: -11 / 01/86
Date Reviewed:—11-/ 07 / 86
A. Graphite Furnace AA Analysis: Sb and Tl with exceptions, As, Cd, Pb, and
Se are quantitative.
B. ICP Analysis: Fe, Al, and Zn with exceptions, Ba, Be, Ca, Cr, Co Cu, Fe,
Mg, Mn, Ni, K, Ag, Na, and V are quantitative.
C. Hg Analysis: Quantitative
D. CN~ Analysis: Low cone, samples are unusable with exceptions. Medium
cone, samples are quantitative.
E. 1C Analysis: N03 and H02 with exceptions, S04, Cl~, and
Br~ are quantitative.
F. Ammonia Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
G. Phenol Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
H. TOG Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
I. POC Analysis: Suspect
J. TOX Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
K. POX Analysis: Semi-quantitative.
NOTE: Usability is determined from guidelines laid out in the "Inorganic Data
Validation SOP" written by D.K. White, May 14, 1985.
Initial Audit by: jPil/^ ' ' iw'j
ill! Koy - 2 jgss '"jj
M.E. Balogh ^
Scientist -••'-...,
Reviewed by:
Keith Aleckson
Senior Scientist
Laboratory Performance Monitoring Group
Locl
-------
-• WP-0860C
INORGANIC DATA USABILITY AUDIT REPORT
Laboratory: Centee Total Number of Samples: 25
Case: 1944 HQ-M Contract Number: 1944 HO
Data User: GWMTF Region: 8 Site Number: 34
QC Number: 93 Site: Texaco
Date Received at EMSL/LV: 10 / 24 / 86 Date Audited: 11/01/86
Date Submitted by Lab: 10/22/86 Date Reviewed:— 11 -/ 07 / 86
DATA 'QUALITY 'SUMMARY ----- ...... -------- '. ---------- ...
A. Graphite Furnace AA Analysis: Sb and Tl with exceptions, As, Cd, Pb, and
Se are quantitative.
B. ICP Analysis: Fe, Al, and Zn with exceptions, Ba, Be, Ca, Cr, Co Cu, Fe,
Mg, Mn, Ni, K, Ag, Na, and V are quantitative.
C. Hg Analysis: Quantitative
D. CN~ Analysis: Low cone, samples are unusable with exceptions. Medium
cone, samples are quantitative.
E. 1C Analysis: K03 and N02 with exceptions, S04, Cl~, and
Br~ are quantitative.
F. Ammonia Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
G. Phenol Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
H. TOC Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
I. POC Analysis: Suspect
J. TOX Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
K. POX Analysis: Semi-quantitative.
NOTE: Usability is determined from guidelines laid out in the "Inorganic Data
Validation SOP" written by D.K. White, May 14, 1985.
DRAFT
StL- {!.- • • ' •
Initial Audit by: $\ Reviewed by:
M.E. Balogh j Keith Aleckson
Scientist -.«•„._.. Senior Scientist
Laboratory Performance Monitoring Group
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Co.
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Tel: (702) 798-3143 (FTS) 545-3143
-------
f \
WP-0860C
INORGANIC DATA USABILITY AUDIT REPORT
Laboratory: Centec
Case: 1944 HQ-M
Data User: GWMTF
QC Number: 93
Region:
Date Received at EMSL/LV: 10 / 24 / 86
Date Submitted by Lab: 10 / 22 / 86
DATA 'QUALITY"SUMMARY
Total Number of Samples:
Contract Number: 1944 HO
Site Number: 34
Site: Texaco
25
Date Audited: 11/01/86
Date Reviewed:—11-/ 07 / 86
A. Graphite Furnace AA Analysis: Sb and Tl with exceptions, As, Cd, Pb, and
Se are quantitative.
B. ICP Analysis: Fe, Al, and Zn with exceptions, Ba, Be, Ca, Cr, Co Cu, Fe,
Mg, Mn, Ni, K, Ag, Na, and V are quantitative.
C. Hg Analysis: Quantitative
D. CN~ Analysis: Low cone, samples are unusable with exceptions. Medium
cone, samples are quantitative.
E. 1C Analysis: N03 and H02 with exceptions, S04, Cl~, and
Br~ are quantitative.
F. Ammonia Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
G. Phenol Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
H. TOG Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
I. POC Analysis: Suspect
J. TOX Analysis: Quantitative with exceptions.
K. POX Analysis: Semi-quantitative.
NOTE: Usability is determined from guidelines laid out in the "Inorganic Data
Validation SOP" written by D.K. White, May 14, 1985.
Initial Audit by:
M.S. Balogh
Scientist
Reviewed by:
Keith Aleckson
Senior Scientist
Laboratory Performance Monitoring Group
Lockheed Sngineering and Management Services Co.
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Tel: (702) 798-3143 (?TS) 545-3143
DRAFT
NOVlG-i;-
-------
I. Purgeable Organic Carbon Analysis
N/A
not analyzed
X
not analyzed
X
Acceptable
X
X
X
X
X
x '•
Unacceptable
X
X
X
Impact 'on
Data
Corrments
11
12
11
Quality Control
1. Initial Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
3. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. P.E. Study
7. Holding Time
8. Contract Compliance
Usability Summary
[ ] a. Quantitative: •
[ ] b. Semi-quantitative:
[ ] c. Qualitative: '
[x] d. Suspect: See comment II. The accuracy of the analysis cannot be verified without an
independent calibration verification.
[ ] e. Unusable:
-------
Quality Control
1. Initial Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
3. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. P.E. Study
7. Holding Time
8. Contract Compliance
Usability Summary
[x] a. Quantitative: with exceptions
[x] b. Semi-Quantitative: MQ0582-WQ0584 and HQ0801-HQ08C6
[ ] c. Qualitative:
[ ] d. Suspect:
[ ] e. Unusable:
F. Amnonia Analysis
Impact on
N/A Acceptable Unacceptable Data Comments
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X "
X
1 biased high
112%, 112%, 112% jsemi-quant.
x
Fl
F2
Fl
-------
Comments/Conclus i ons
Fl The continuing calibration verification (CCVs) were outside the DQO range for accuracy of
90-110%. If the CCV deviation from.the true value js greater than the.DQO range for accuracy, the
instrument should be recalibrated and preceding samples reanalyzed. Results for samples
MQ0582-MQ0594 and HQ0801-MQ0806 are considered semi-quantitative since their associated CCV
recoveries were 112%.
F2 The spike recovery for the medium water sample is 115%. The DQO limit for this analysis is
90-110%. This limit may be too tight. A more reasonable DQO would be 85-115%. Using the DQO as
a guide for usability, the medium concentration results are semi-quantitative.
-------
G. Phenol Analysis
Acceptable
Impact on
Unacceptable Data
Quality Control M/A
I
1. Initial Cal. Verification [
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
3. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. P.E. Study
7. Holding Time
8. Contract Compliance
Usability Summary
[x] a. Quantitative:
[ ] b. Semi-Quantitative:
[ ] c. Qualitative:
[ ] d. Suspect:
[x] e. Unusable: MQ0592, MQ0593, MQ0596, HQ0597, HQ0801, HQ0802, HQ0803, MQ0804, MQ0806.
Comments
Run # 2 was not
on worksheet
G2
G3
Gl
-------
Conroents/Conclus i ons
G1 An analysis date was not indicated in the raw data or on the worksheets for run #2.
G2 The field duplicate result is outside the contract control limit for precision..
Sample ID Level/Matrix % RSD DQO ST. 52
MQ0588, MQ0599 LW 32 10 394000 284000
The field duplicate results were not used for data usability purposes, as requested.
G3 The trip and equipment blanks are above the detection limits (DL).
Trip Blank (ug/1) Equipment Blank (yq/1)
HQ0582 HQ0594 HQ0595 HQ0600
86 ~ ' 43 16 41 -
All data at or greater than 10 times the highest field blank concentration or less than the
detection limit are considered quantitative. Data at or greater than 4 to 5 times the highest
field blank concentration are considered qualitative. The remaining samples are considered
unusable-. Sample results for HQ0592, HQ0593, HQ0596, HQ0597, HQ0801, HQ0802, MQ0803, HQ0804 and
MQ0806 are considered unusable.
-------
H.
N/A
X
Total Organic
Acceptable
,
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x -
X
X
Carbon Analysis
Unacceptable
* ' -< • 1 L
.
X
Impact on
Data
. • .
Comments
H2
HI
HI
Quality Control
1. Initial Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
3. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. P.E. Study
7. Holding Time
8. Contract Compliance
Usability Summary
[x] a. Quantitative: with exceptions
[ ] b. Semi-Quantitative:
[x] c. Qualitative: MQ0589, MQ0592, MQ0593, MQ0596, HQ0597, KQ0801, WJ0802, MQ0803
[ ] d. Suspect:
[x] e. Unusable: MQ0598, MQ0583, MQ0584, HQ0806
-------
Conrnents/Concl us i ons
HI A calibration blank was not analyzed at the end of the run. It is good laboratory practice to
analyze a calibration blank at the end of each run. . ,., ,, . ,. ,..„,.,
H2 The following trip and equipment blanks are above the detection limit of 1000 yg/1.
Trip Blank (yg/1) Equipment Blank (yg/L)
HQO 582 HQ0595 HQ0600
2200 1300 3900
All data at or greater than 10 times the highest field blank concentration or less than the
detection limit are considered quantitative. Data at or greater than 4 to 5 times the highest
field blank are considered qualitative. The remaining data are considered unusable. Results for
samples MQ0598, MQ0583, MC.0584, and HQ0806 are unusable. Results for samples MQ0589,-HQ0592,
HQ0593, MQ0596, HQ0597, HQ0801, MQ0802, and HQ0803 are considered qualitative. The remaining
samples are quantitative.
-------
Conrnents/Concl us i ons
II Initial calibration verifications and continuing calibration verifications were not analyzed.
'Three-spike solutions were analyzed towards the end of the run* - Since the-true value of the spike'
was not provided, the instrument calibration could not be assessed. It is good laboratory
practice to analyze a calibration verification standard at the beginning and the end of the run.
The lab should be supplied with a calibration verification solution by the EPA. The accuracy of
the analysis cannot be verified without an independent calibration verification.
12 The holding time for the analysis was from 10 to 14 days. SHO has told the lab that a 14 day
holding time is acceptable. EMSL-Las Vegas recomnends that a 7 day holding time be used.
-------
J. Total Organic'Halide Analysis
N/A
-
X
Acceptable
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Unacceptable
x
x
4
X
Impact on
Data
'--"-'.
'
Comments
\ --
Jl
Jl
-
Jl
Quality Control
V. Initial Cal. Verification "
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
3. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. P.E. Study
7. Holding Time
3. Interference
9. Contract Compliance
Usability Stannary
[x] a. Quantitative:
[x] b. Semi-Quantitative: MQ0584-KQ0586, MQ0585-HQ0587, MQ0597, MQ0599, HQ0600
[ ] c. Qualitative:
[ ] d. Suspect:
[ ] e. Unusable:
Ccmments/Concius i ons
Jl The analysis was run over a period of four days. Although the data of analysis is indicated on
the worksheets, there is no indication when each day's run begins and ends. Results for samples
MQ0584-KQ0586 are considered semi-quantitative since it is not evident if there was a final
calibration blank (CB) and final calibration verification (CV) run on 8/26 or an initial C8 and
initial CV run on 8/27. Results for samples MQ0585-HQ0587 are considered semi-quantitative
because a final CV was not analyzed. Results for samples MQ0597, HQ0599, and HQ0600 are
considered semi-quantitative since a final CV was not analyzed.
-------
K. Purgeable Organic Halide Analysis
Quality Control
1. Initial Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Source
2. Continuing Cal. Verification
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
3. Duplicates
a. Percent or
Absolute Difference
b. Frequency
4. Spikes
a. Recoveries
b. Frequency
5. Blanks
a. Meets CRDL Limit
b. Frequency
6. P.E. Study
7. Holding Time
8. Contract Compliance
Usability Sunmary
[ ] a. Quantitative:
[x] b. Semi-Quantitative:
[ ] c. Qualitative:
[ ] d. Suspect:
[ ] e. Unusable:
N/A
Impact on
Acceptable Unacceptable _ Data
Comments
I-'
K2
XT
K3
Kl, K2
-------
APPENDIX H
-------
prc
PRC Engineering Planning Research Corporation
Suite"600
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
312-938-0300
TWX 910-2215112
Cacle CONTOWENG
December 18, 1986
Mr. Anthony Montrone
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water
Task Force (WH-562A)
U.S. EPA
401 M Street, S.W., Room S-301
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Mr. Montrone:
PRC Environmental Management, Inc. are pleased to submit for your review the
final memorandum for QA/QC support of Work Assignment No. 548 entitled
"Evaluation of Quality Control Attendant to the Analysis of Samples from the
Texaco, Wyoming Facility."
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please feel free to contact
us.
Sincerely,
PRC Environmental Management, Inc.
jb.D3.mQl T. Cho
DTC/cvh
0 .
w
Nancy Deck (w/1 copy of report)
Bruce Bakaysa (letter only)
Barbara Elkus (w/1 copy of report)
Richard Steimle (w/1 copy of report)
Paul Friedman (w/1 copy of report)
Ken Partymiller (w/1 copy of report)
Juanita Hillman (w/1 copy of report)
John Haggard (w/1 copy of report
Gareth Pearson (w/1 copy of report)
Chuck Hoover (w/1 copy of report)
Ed Berg (w/1 copy of report)
-------
prc
PRC Engineering
Suite 500
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
3-2-938-0300
7WX 910-2215112
Cacle CONTOWENG
Planning Research Corporation
f^.
. • •
t~ 3 -i « ^
CGNF!Q£N7iAL
EVALUATION OF QUALITY CONTROL ATTENDANT
TO THE ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FROM THE
TEXACO, WYOMING FACILITY
FINAL MEMORANDUM
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Waste Programs Enforcement
Washington, D.C. 20460
Work Assignment No.
EPA Region
Site No.
Date Prepared
Contract No.
PRC No.
Prepared By
Telephone No.
EPA Primary Contacts
Telephone No.
548
Headquarters
N/A
December 18, 1986
68-01-7037
15-5480-06
PRC Environmental
Management, Inc.
(Ken Partymiller)
(713) 292-7568
Anthony Montrone/
Barbara Elkus
(202) 382-7912
•ij iti^jrti-»v».*''i n~ {rn^i^T
Li Art:Liffiiii..,'i ur Lh^ina
-------
pro
PRC Engineering Planning Research Corporation
Suite 6CO
303 East Wacker Drive T
Ocago, IL 60601
312-938-0300
T\VX 910-2215112 - •
CdDie CONTOWENG
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 18, 1986
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Quality Control Attendant to the Analysis of Samples
from the Texaco, Wyoming Facility
FROM: Ken Partymiller, Chemist
PRC Environmental Management
THRU: Paul H. Friedman, Chemist*
Studies and Methods Branch (WH-562B)
TO: HWGWTF: Tony Montrone*
Gareth Pearson (EPA 8231)*
Richard Steimle*
Ed Berg (EPA 8214)*
Juanita Hillman, Region VIII
John Haggard, Region VIII
This memo summarizes the evaluation of the quality control data generated by
the Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force (HWGWTF) contract analytical
laboratories (1). This evaluation and subsequent conclusions pertain to the data
from the Texaco, Wyoming sampling effort by the Hazardous Waste Ground-Water
Task Force.
The objective of this evaluation is to give users of the analytical data a more
precise understanding of the limitations of the data as well as their appropriate use.
A second objective is to identify weaknesses in the data generation process for
correction. This correction may act on future analyses at this or other sites.
The evaluation was carried out on information provided in the accompanying
quality control reports (2-3) which contain raw data, statistically transformed data,
and graphically transformed data.
The evaluation process consisted of three steps. Step one consisted of
generation of a package which presents the results of quality control
HWGWTF Data Evaluation Committee Member
-------
procedures, including the generation of data quality indicators, synopses of
statistical indicators, and the results of technical qualifier inspections. A report on
the results of the performance evaluation standards analyzed by the laboratory was
also generated. Step.two was an independent examination of the quality control
package and the performance evaluation sample results by members of the Data
Evaluation Committee. This was followed by a meeting (teleconference) of the Data
Evaluation Committee to discuss the foregoing data and data presentations. These
discussions were to come to a consensus, if possible, concerning the appropriate use
of the data within the context of the HWGWTF objectives. The discussions were
also to detect and discuss specific or general inadequacies of the data and to
determine if these are correctable or inherent in the analytical process.
Preface
The data user should review the pertinent materials contained in the
accompanying reports (2-3). Questions generated in the interpretation of these data
relative to sampling and analysis should be referred to Rich Steimle of the
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force.
I. Site Overview
The Texaco facility includes a landfarm and is located in Wyoming. No other
information on the facility was available to the HWGWTF teleconference.
Twenty-five field samples including a field blank (MQO587/QO587), three
equipment blanks (MQO594/QO594, MQO595/QO595, and MQO600/QO600), one trip
blank (MQO582/QO582), and a pair of duplicate samples (well M36, MQO588/QO588
and MQO590/QO590) were collected at this..facility. Samples MQO596/QO596,
MQO599/QO599, and MQO804/Q0804 were medium concentration ground-water
samples. Samples MQO802/QO802, MQO803/QO803, and MQO805/QO805 were low
concentration surface water samples. All other samples were low concentration
ground-water samples.
II. Evaluation of Quality Control Data and Analytical Data
1.0 Metals
1.1 Performance Evaluation Standards
Metal analyte performance evaluation standards were not evaluated in
conjunction with the samples collected from this facility.
1.2 Metals OC Evaluation
For the low concentration ground-water samples, total metal spike recoveries
were calculated for sixteen ICP analytes spiked into sample MQO588 and for six
graphite furnace AA analytes plus mercury spiked into sample MQO589. Nineteen of
the twenty-three metal spike recoveries from the low concentration ground-water
samples were within the data quality objectives (DQOs) for this Program. The
aluminum, iron, and zinc average spike recoveries were outside DQO with values of
4, 74, and 58 percent, respectively. The sodium spike recovery was not calculated
because the sodium concentration in the sample was greater than four times the
concentration of the spike. Spike recoveries for these metals in the low
concentration ground-water samples are listed in Table 3-la of Reference 2 as well
as in the following Sections. A listing of which samples were spiked for each
analyte is also available in Table 3-2a of Reference 2.
-------
For the medium concentration samples, total metal spike recoveries were
calculated for sixteen ICP analytes and six graphite furncce AA analytes spiked into
sample MQO804 and for mercury spiked into sample MQO804. Twenty of the
twenty-three metal spike recoveries from the medium concentration-spiked-samples •
were within DQOs. The magnesium and manganese spike recoveries were outside
DQO with values of 69 and 72 percent. The sodium spike recovery was not
calculated because the sodium concentration in the sample was greater than four
times the concentration of the spike. Spike recoveries for these metals in the
medium concentration samples are listed in Table 3-1 b of Reference 2 as well as in
the following Sections. A listing of which samples were spiked for each analyte is
also available in Table 3-2b of Reference 2.
All reported laboratory control sample (LCS) recoveries and all calibration
verification standard (CVS) recoveries were within Program DQOs.
The average relative percent differences (RPDs) for fifteen of the seventeen
metallic analytes in ground-water, for which RPDs could be calculated, were within
the DQOs. RPDs for aluminum and zinc were outside DQO and no RPDs could be
calculated for beryllium, cadmium, copper, mercury, silver, and thallium because one
or both of the duplicate values were Jess than the contract required detection limit
(CRDL). The average RPDs for all metallic analytes in the medium concentration
samples for which RPDs could be calculated were within the DQOs. RPDs for
aluminum, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury,
nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc could not be calculated because
one or both of the duplicate values were less than the CRDL.
Required analyses were performed on all metals samples submitted to the
laboratory.
No contamination was reported in the laboratory blanks. Aluminum and iron
contamination was detected in the equipment blank (MQO600) at 389 and 107 ug/L,
respectively. Both of these values are above their respective CRDLs of 200 and 100
ug/L.
1.3 Furnace Metals
The graphite furnace AA metals (antimony, arsenic, cadmium, lead, selenium,
and thallium) quality control was acceptable unless specifically noted.
The analytical spike recoveries for antimony in sample MQO591 were below the
DQO limit. The duplicate injection relative standard deviation (RSD) for antimony
in sample MQO586 was below the DQO acceptance range and the results for this
sample should be considered qualitative. All antimony results, except those for
sample MQO586 and 591 should be considered quantitative. Antimony results for
sample MQO586 should be considered qualitative and antimony results for MQO591
should be considered unreliable.
No problems were detected with the arsenic data. All arsenic results should
be considered quantitative.
No problems were detected with the cadmium data. All cadmium results should
be considered quantitative.
The correlation coefficients for the method of standard addition (MSA) analysis
of lead in samples MQO588 and 596 were outside of DQO. All lead results, with the
exception of samples MQO588 and 596, should be considered quantitative. Lead
-------
results for sample MQO588 should be considered qualitative and results for MQO596
should be considered unreliable.
. The. field duplicate .precision for selenium in the duplicate pair (MQO588/590)
was poor with 99 ug/L of selenium reported in sample MQO588 and 74 ug/L
reported in MQO590. The selenium CRDL is 5 ug/L and the instrument detection
limit (IDL) is 3 ug/L. The comparative precision of the field duplicate results is
not used in the evaluation of sample results as it is not possible to determine the
source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision is reported for informational
purposes only. All selenium results should be considered quantitative.
No problems were detected with the thallium data. All thallium results should
be considered quantitative.
1.4 TCP Metals
One of the equipment blanks contained aluminum and iron contamination at
concentrations greater than the CRDL. Equipment blank MQO600 contained 389
ug/L of aluminum and 107 ug/L of iron. As a HWGWTF convention, all results
greater than ten times the highest sampling blank concentration or less than the
instrument detection limit are considered quantitative (unless there are other
problems with the data). Results greater than five but less than ten times the
highest concentration of sampling blank contamination are considered qualitative and
all other data are considered unusable. As a result of this blank contamination,
iron results for samples MQO583 and 586 and aluminum results for samples MQO588,
590, 592, and 596 should be considered qualitative and the iron results for sample
MQO803 and aluminum results for samples MQO583, 584, 585, 597, 599, 801, 802, 803,
804, and 805 should be considered unusable. Because of other sampling and/or
analysis problems, the usability of the iron and aluminum results summarized here is
only an upper limit and other quality control problems could lower the above
usability determinations.
The low level (twice CRDL) linear range checks for beryllium, chromium,
copper, and silver had poor recoveries. The low level linear range check is an
analysis of a solution with elemental concentrations near the detection limit. The
range check analysis shows the accuracy which can be expected by the method for
results near the detection limits. The accuracy reported for these elements is not
unexpected. Beryllium results for all samples were affected and the results should
be considered biased low. Chromium and silver results for samples MQO582 583
584, 585, 586, 587, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, and 801
were affected and should be considered biased low. Copper and silver results for
samples MQO588, 802, 803, 804, 805, and 806 should be considered to be biased low.
Individual spike recoveries were outside DQO for aluminum, iron, and zinc in
low concentration ground-water sample MQO588 with reported recoveries of 4, 74,
and 58 percent, respectively. Low spike recoveries usually indicate results which '
are biased low. Positive aluminum results from low concentration ground-water
samples should be considered qualitative and biased very low. Negative aluminum
results from these same samples should be considered unusable due to a high
probability of false negatives. All iron results from the low concentration ground-
water samples should be considered to be biased low and semi-quantitative. All zinc
results from the low concentration ground-water samples should be considered to be
biased low and qualitative.
Laboratory duplicate results for aluminum in low concentration ground-water
sample MQO588 were outside DQO with an RPD of 85 percent.
-------
The high sulfate concentrations do not appear to have affected the barium
analyses as both the internal control standard and .the spike recoveries for barium
were acceptable. ;
The field duplicate precision for zinc in the duplicate pair (MQO588/590) was
poor with 120 ug/L of zinc reported in sample MQO588 and 34 ug/L reported in
MQO590. The zinc CRDL is -20 ug/L. The comparative precision of the field
duplicate results is not used in the evaluation of sample results as it is not possible
to determine the source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision is reported
for informational purposes only.
All barium, beryllium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, magnesium,
manganese, nickel, potassium, silver, sodium, and vanadium results should be
considered quantitative. Medium concentration matrix aluminum (with exceptions),
iron, and zinc results should also be considered quantitative. The low concentration
matrix iron results, with three exceptions, should be considered semi-quantitative.
The low concentration matrix results for iron in samples MQO583 and 586, all of
the low concentration matrix results for zinc, the low concentration matrix positive
aluminum results for samples MQO588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 598, and 806, and the
medium concentration aluminum results for sample MQO596 should be considered
qualitative. All negative low concentration matrix aluminum results, positive low
concentration matrix aluminum results for samples MQO583, 584, 585, 597, 599, and
801, the medium concentration aluminum results for samples MQO802, 803, 804, and
805, and low concentration results for iron in sample MQO803 should be not be used
due to blank contamination.
1.5 Mercury
No problems were detected with the mercury data. All mercury results should
be considered quantitative with an acceptable probability of false negatives.
2.0 Inorganic and Indicator Analvtes
2.1 Performance Evaluation Standard
Inorganic and indicator analyte performance evaluation standards were not
evaluated in conjunction with the samples collected from this facility.
2.2 Inorganic and Indicator Analvte PC Evaluation
The spike recoveries of all of the inorganic and indicator analytes, except for
cyanide in the low concentration ground-water sample, were within the accuracy
DQOs (accuracy DQOs have not been established for bromide and nitrite nitrogen
matrix spikes). The cyanide spike recovery was zero percent in the low
concentration sample. The bromide and nitrite nitrogen spike recoveries were 110
and 102 percent in the low concentration ground-water sample and 97 and 102
percent in the medium concentration sample. This indicates acceptable recoveries
for all inorganic and indicator analytes except for cyanide in the low concentration
sample.
All LCS and CVS recoveries reported in the raw data for inorganic and
indicator analytes were within Program DQOs except for three CCVs for ammonia
nitrogen.
All calculable RPDs for the inorganic and indicator analytes were within
Program DQOs. RPDs for six of twelve analytes from the low concentration sample
-------
and five of the twelve from the medium concentration samples were not able to be
calculated as either the sample or the duplicate value was less than the CRDL.
Precision DQOs have not been established for bromide and nitrite nitrogen.
Requested analyses were performed on all samples for the inorganic and
indicator analytes.
No laboratory blank contamination was reported for any inorganic or indicator
analyte. Contamination involving TOC and total phenols was found in the equipment
and the trip blanks at levels above CRDL. These contaminants and their
concentrations are listed below, as well as in Section 3.2.4 (page 3-3) of Reference
2.
2.3 Inorganic and Indicator Analvte Data
No quality control problems were identified with the chloride, bromide, and
sulfate data. All results for these analytes should be considered quantitative. The
chloride field duplicate precision for the duplicate pair MQO588/599 was poor
(100,000 versus 80,000 ug/L). The comparative precision of the field duplicate
results is not used in the evaluation of sample results as it is not possible to
determine the source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision is reported for
informational purposes only.
The 48 hour holding time for nitrate and nitrite nitrogen was exceeded for
samples MQO589, 593, 597, 801, and 802 and results for these samples should be
considered semi-quantitative. All other nitrate and nitrite nitrogen results should
be considered quantitative.
The low concentration matrix cyanide spike recovery for sample MQO588 had.
zero percent recovery. All low concentration matrix cyanide results below the
detection limit (non-detects) should not be used. All positive low concentration
results (samples MQO552, 585, 586, 592, 593, and 597) should be considered
qualitative. All medium concentration matrix results (samples MQO596, 599, 802,
803, 804, and 805) should be considered quantitative with an acceptable probability
of false negatives.
The ammonia nitrogen continuing calibration verifications (CCVs) were outside
the Program DQO for accuracy. The analytical instrument should have been
recalibrated and the preceding samples reanalyzed. Because of this problem, results
for samples MQO582, 583, 584, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, and 806 should be considered
semi-quantitative. The ammonia nitrogen spike recovery for the medium
concentration matrix was above DQO. As a result, all medium concentration matrix
ammonia nitrogen results should be considered semi-quantitative. This includes
samples MQO596, 599, 802, 803, 804, and 805. Results for all ammonia nitrogen
samples not mentioned above should be considered quantitative.
The total phenols analysis date for Run #2 was not indicated in the raw data
or on the worksheet. The total phenols field duplicate precision for the duplicate
pair MQO588/599 was poor (394,000 versus 284,000 ug/L). The comparative precision
of the field duplicate results is not used in the evaluation of sample results as it is
not possible to determine the source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision
is reported- for informational purposes only. Total phenol contamination was found
in the equipment blanks (MQO594, 595, and 600) and the trip blank (MQO582) at
concentrations of 43, 16, 41, and 86 ug/L, respectively. These values are above the
total phenol CRDL of 10 ug/L. Based upon HWGWTF conventions, all total phenols
results greater than 10 times the highest concentration of total phenols in the
-------
sampling blanks or less than the detection limit are considered quantitative. All
total phenols results greater than five but less than ten times the highest
concentration of sampling blank contamination are considered qualitative and all
• other data are considered -unusable-. Total phenols results for samples..MQQ,592, 593,,..
596, 597, 801, 802, 803, 804, and 806 should not be used. All other total phenols
results should be considered quantitative.
A continuing calibration blank (CCB) was not analyzed at the end of the TOC
analytical batch. Two equipment blanks (MQO595 and 600) and the trip blank
(MQO582) contained TOC at concentrations of 1300, 3900, and 2200 ug/L which were
above the CRDL for TOC of 1000 ug/L. Again, as a HWGWTF convention, all TOC
results greater that ten times the highest field blank concentration or less than the
detection limit should be considered quantitative. All TOC results greater than five
but less than ten times the highest concentration of sampling blank contamination
are considered qualitative and all other data are considered unusable. The TOC
results for samples MQO589, 592, 593, 596, 597, 801, 802, and 803 should be
considered qualitative and the TOC results for samples MQO583, 584, 598, and 806
should not be used. Results for all other TOC samples should be considered
quantitative.
Initial calibration verification (ICV) and CCV standards for POC were not
analyzed. A POC spike solution was run three times during the analytical batch but
the "true" value of the spike was not provided by the laboratory. EPA needs to
supply the inorganic laboratory with a POC calibration verification solution. Until
then, the instrument calibration can not be assessed. The POC results should be
considered qualitative.
The TOX analysis was run over a period of four days. Although the date of
analysis is indicated on the laboratory worksheets, it is not clear when each day's
run began and ended. It is not evident if a final CCV and final CCB were run at
the end and if an ICV and initial calibration blank (ICB) were run at the beginning
of all of the analytical batch. The TOX results should be considered semi-
quantitative for samples MQO584, 585, 586, 587, 597, 599, and 600 because of this.
All other TOX results should be considered quantitative.
CCBs were not run during or at the end of the POX analytical batch. The
holding times for POX samples ranged from 10 to 14 days which exceeds the
recommended holding time of seven days. POX results for all samples should be
considered semi-quantitative.
3.0 Organics and Pesticides
3.1 Performance Evaluation Standard
Organic performance evaluation standards were not evaluated in conjunction
with the samples collected from this facility.
3.2 Organic OC Evaluation
Eight of twenty-two matrix spike average recoveries from the low
concentration matrix samples were outside the established Program DQOs for
accuracy. Individual matrix spike recoveries which were outside the accuracy DQO
will be discussed in the appropriate Sections below. No organic matrix spikes were
added to the medium concentration samples. All surrogate spike average recoveries
from both low and medium concentration samples were within DQOs for accuracy.
-------
Individual surrogate spike recoveries which were outside the accuracy DQO will be
discussed in the appropriate Sections below.
All matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate average RPDs were within Program
DQOs for precision. Individual matrix spike RPDs which were outside the precision
DQO will be discussed in the appropriate Sections below. All average surrogate
spike RPDs met Program DQOs for precision.
All organic analyses were performed as requested.
Laboratory blank contamination was reported for organics and is discussed in
Reference 3 (for organics) as well as in the appropriate Sections below.
Detection limits for the organic fractions arc summarized in Reference 3 (for
organics) as well as in the appropriate Sections below.
3.3 Volatiles
Quality control data indicate that volatile organics were determined acceptably.
The chromatograms appear acceptable. Initial and continuing calibrations, tunings
and mass calibrations, blanks, matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates, and
surrogate spikes are acceptable.
Estimated method detection limits were CRDL for all volatile samples except
QO587 (2 times CRDL), 588 (25 times), 590 (23 times), 594 (2 times), 596 (10 times),
599 (45 times), 801 (9 times), and 804 (6 times). Dilution of these samples was
required due to the presence of high concentrations of organics and, especially for
samples QO588, 590, 596, 599, and 80J, may. result in false negatives.
Acetone and methylene chloride were found in instrument blank CB860818B12
at concentrations below the CRDL. This did not affect the data evaluation.
Samples QO588 and 590 were screened by the laboratory for volatile analysis
and determined to be medium concentration samples. The traffic reports labeled the
samples as low concentration samples.
The volatiles data are acceptable. The volatile compound results should be
considered quantitative with the exception of samples QO588, 590, 596, 599, and 801
which should be considered semi-quantitative due to an increased probability of
false negative results. The probability of false negative results for all other
samples is acceptable.
3.4 Semivolatiles
Initial and continuing calibrations, tuning and mass calibrations, blanks, and
chromatograms were acceptable for the semivolatiles. Some problems were
encountered with matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate recoveries, surrogate
recoveries, and holding times.
The estimated detection limits for the semivolatiles are twice CRDL except for
samples QO585 (8 times CRDL), 586 (20 times), 588 (1000 times), 590 (800 times),
591 (20 times), 596 (20 times), 599 (20 times), and 804 (40 times) due to required
dilutions.
Semivolatile surrogate compounds were not recovered from samples QO588,
588MS, 588MSD, 590, 599, and 804 due to high dilutions.
-------
The semivolatile matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate compounds were not
recovered from sample QO588 due to the 1000 fold dilution of the sample. The
matrix spike duplicate recovery of pyrene (145 percent) from sample QO806 was
above the DQO of 26 to 127 percent. .The RPD between matrix spike and.matrix
spike duplicate recovery of 4-nitrophenol in sample QO806 was above DQO.
Contamination was detected in laboratory blank GH096358C22. The blank
contained bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate at less than the CRDL. This did not impact the
data.
The semivolatile data are acceptable and the results should be considered
quantitative for all samples except QO586, 591, and 596 which should be considered
semi-quantitative and QO588, 590, 599, and 804 which should be considered
qualitative. The semi-quantitative and qualitative samples were of diminished quality
due to increased probabilities of false negatives due to dilution.
3.5 Pesticides
The initial and continuing calibrations, blanks, matrix spike/matrix spike
duplicates, and chromatography for pesticides were generally acceptable.
The estimated method detection limits for the pesticides fraction were CRDL
for all samples except for samples QO585 (10 times CRDL), 588 (20 times), 590 (20
times), 591 (2 times), 596 (2 times), 598 (2 times), 802 (2 times), and 804 (2 times)
due to required dilutions. The high dilutions of samples QO585, 588, and 590 may
result in false negatives.
, . The pesticide matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate compounds were not .,.
recovered from sample QO588 due to high dilution.
Dibutylchlorendate was not recovered from samples QO585, 588, and 590 due to
high dilutions after surrogate addition. The dibutylchlorendate recovery (21
percent) from sample QO599 was below DQO limits.
The dibutylchlorendatc shift was found using the improper Eval Mix. Samples
QO585, 591, 804, and 805 had a retention time shift greater than the 2 percent
difference criteria. The dibutylchlorendate peak from the surrogate spike was
missing from chromatograms for samples QO588, 590, and 598.
Aldrin was tentatively identified in the pesticide chromatogram of sample
QO590 by the EMSL/Las Vegas data reviewers.
The pesticides results should be considered qualitative. There is an enhanced
probability of false negatives in several samples due to dilutions.
III. Data Usability Summary
4.0 Graphite Furnace Metals
Quantitative: all arsenic, cadmium, thallium, and selenium results; antimony
and lead results with exceptions
Qualitative: antimony results for sample MQO586 and lead results for
sample MQO588
-------
Unreliable: antimony results for sample MQO591 and lead results for sample
MQO596
4.1 ICP Metals
Quantitative: all barium, beryllium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper,
magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, silver, sodium, and
vanadium results and medium-concentration matrix results for
aluminum with exceptions and iron and zinc
Semi-quantitative: low concentration matrix iron results with exceptions
listed below
Qualitative: low concentration matrix positive aluminum results for samples
MQO588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 598, and 806; medium
concentration aluminum results for sample MQO596; low
concentration matrix zinc results; and low concentration matrix
iron results for samples MQO583 and 586
Unusable: low concentration matrix negative aluminum results; low
concentration matrix positive aluminum results for samples
MQO583, 584, 585, 597, 599, and 801; iron results for sample
MQO803
4.2 Mercury
Quantitative: all mercury results
4.3 Inorganic and Indicator Analvtes
Quantitative: all chloride, bromide, and sulfate results; nitrate nitrogen,
nitrite nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, total phenols, TOC, and TOX
results with exceptions; and cyanide results for samples MQO596,
599, 802, 803, 804, and 805
Semi-quantitative: all POX results; ammonia nitrogen results for samples
MQO582, 583, 584, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, and 806; nitrate and
nitrite nitrogen results for samples MQO589, 593, 597, 801, and
802; TOC results for samples MQO589, 592, 593, 596, 597, 801,
802, and 803; and TOX results for samples MQO584, 585, 586,
587, 597, 599, and 600
Qualitative: all POC results; and cyanide results for samples MQO552, 585,
586, 592, 593, and 597
Unusable: ' cyanide results with the above exceptions; total phenols results
for samples MQO592, 593, 596, 597, 801, 802, 803, 804, and 806;
and TOC results for samples MQO583, 584, 598, and 806
4.4 Organics
Quantitative: volatile and semivolatile results with exceptions
-------
Semi-quantitative: volatile results for samples QO588, 590, 596, 599, and 801;
semivo.latile results for samples QO586, 591, and 596; and
positive semivolatile results for samples QO588, 590, 599, and
804
Qualitative: all pesticides results; all negative (non-detect) semivolatile
results for samples QO588, 590, 599, and 804 are qualified by a
higher than usual probalility of false negative results due to dilution
IV. References
1. Organic Analyses: CompuChem Laboratories, Inc.
P.O. Box 12652
3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
(919) 549-8263
Inorganic and Indicator Analyses:
Centec -Laboratories
P.O. Box 956
2160 Industrial Drive
Salem, VA 24153
(703) 387-3995
2. Draft Quality Control Data Evaluation Report (Assessment of the Usability of
the Data Generated) for site 34, Texaco, WY, 11/10/1986, Prepared by
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Company, Inc., for the US EPA
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task .Force.
3. Draft Inorganic Data Usability Audit Report and Draft Organic Data Usability
Report, for the Texaco, Wyoming site, Prepared by Laboratory Performance
Monitoring Group, Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Co., Las
Vegas, Nevada, for US EPA, EMSL/Las Vegas, 11/10/1986.
-------
V. Addressees
Ed Berg
.Chief, Project Management Section,. Quality Assurance. Branch, EMSL/CI
US Environmental Protection Agency
26 West St. Clair Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Anthony Montrone
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force, OSWER (WH-562A)
US Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Gareth Pearson
Quality Assurance Division
US EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory - Las Vegas
P.O. Box 1198
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Richard Steimle
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force, OSWER (WH-562A)
US Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Juanita Hillman
US Environmental Protection Agency
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, CO 80295
John Haggard
US Environmental Protection Agency
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, CO 80295
Paul Friedman
Characterization and Assessment Division, OSW (WH-562B)
US Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Chuck Hoover
Laboratory Performance Monitoring Group
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Company
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1 REGION VIII
999 18th STREET-SUITE 500
DENVER. COLORADO 80202-2405
REF 8RC CEC 2 i U;cu
Mr. W. E. Rickart
Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.
P.O. Box 307
Evansville, Wyoming 82636
Dear Mr. Rickart:
With this letter we are hereby transmitting copies of analytical data
from samples taken by the Ground Water Task Force of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, at the Texaco Casper Refinery during the week of
August 11, 1986. The'data indicates that ground water on both the north and
south sides of the North Platte River contain significant concentrations of
hazardous constituents that could impact human health and the environment.
Based upon this data and the information available on Texaco's past and
present waste management practices at the Casper Refinery, EPA has determined
that there is or has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents thereof
from your facility. In order to address this release, EPA intends to issue an
order requiring corrective action or other appropriate response measure as
necessary to protect human health or the environment.
This corrective action order will be issued pursuant to EPA's authority
under section 3003(h) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as
amsndad by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). We
anticipate that the order will address site investigation and corrective
measures for the known ground water contamination as well as any newly
identified or potential sources of contamination.
As a related matter, EPA has also learned that Texaco intends to proceed
with a ground water quality cleanup program that involves the flushing of
degraded ground water with river water placed in the chemical evaporation
pond, ("Evaluation of Groundwater Cleanup Options, Casper Texaco Refinery
North Property (Final Draft)", dated October 27, 1986.) While this cleanup
option has been presented ay Texaco as a means for "enhancing" natural
attenuation, it is EPA's view that the ground water flushing could result in
higher concentrations.of hazardous wastes or constituents in the alluvial
aquifer by the river and a greater liklihood that a threat to human health or
the environment will occur. EPA believes that this program should not be
initiated until further investigation and study on the influence of your
activities on contaminant movement at the facility has been completed.
The ground water contamination at the Texaco Casper Refinery is a serious
environmental concern. We would like to meet with representatives of your
company to discuss actions that must be taken at the site.
£• f
-------
- 2 -
We look forward to hearing from you within the next ten days. If you
have any questions, please call John Haggard at (303) 293-1511 or
Elizabeth Bohanon, Office of Regional Counsel- at -(303-)'293-1290. • • •
Sincerely,
Robert L. Duprey, Director
Waste Management Division
cc: yMr. Bill Garland, WDEQ
»Ms. Deborah Sherer, EPA Region VIII
Ms. Elizabeth Bohanon, EPA Region VIII
Mr. Anthony Montrone, Ground Water Task Force
Mr. Mark Reinhardt, Esq., Texaco, Inc.
-------
APPENDIX H
-------
prc
PRC Engineering Planning Research Corporation
Suite'600
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago. IL 60601 ....
312-938-0300
TWX 910-2215112
Cable CONTOWENG
December 18, 1986
Mr. Anthony Montrone
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water
Task Force (WH-562A)
U.S. EPA
401 M Street, S.W., Room S-301
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Mr. Montrone:
PRC Environmental Management, Inc. are pleased to submit for your review the
final memorandum for QA/QC support of Work Assignment No. 548 entitled
"Evaluation of Quality Control Attendant to the Analysis of Samples from the
Texaco, Wyoming Facility."
If you have any questions regarding this submiual, please feel free to contact
us.
Sincerely,
PRC Environmental Management, Inc.
<_Daniel T. Chow
DTC/cvh
cc: Nancy Deck (w/1 copy of report)
Bruce Bakaysa (letter only)
Barbara Elkus (w/1 copy of report)
Richard Steimle (w/1 copy of report)
Paul Friedman (w/1 copy of report)
Ken Partymiller (w/1 copy of report)
Juanita Hillman (w/1 copy of report)
John Haggard (w/1 copy of report) \/
Gareth Pearson (w/1 copy of report)
Chuck Hoover (w/1 copy of report)
Ed Berg (w/1 copy of report)
-------
prc
PRC Engineering
Suite 500
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago. IL 60601
3 •2-938-0300
7WX 910-2215112
Cacle CONTOWENG
Planning Research Corporation
CONFIDENTIAL
EVALUATION OF QUALITY CONTROL ATTENDANT
TO THE ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FROM THE
TEXACO, WYOMING FACILITY
FINAL MEMORANDUM
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Waste Programs Enforcement
Washington, D.C. 20460
Work Assignment No.
EPA Region
Site No.
Date Prepared
Contract No.
PRC No.
Prepared By
Telephone No.
EPA Primary Contacts
Telephone No.
548
Headquarters
N/A
December 18, 1986
68-01-7037
15-5480-06
PRC Environmental
Management, Inc.
(Ken Partymiller)
(713) 292-7568
Anthony Montrone/
Barbara Elkus
(202) 382-7912
.*
-------
pro
PRC Engineering Planning Research Corporation
Suite 600
303 East Wacker Drive
C-s.'cago. IL 60601
3'2-933-0300
TvVX 910-2215112 - '
Cdcie CONTOWENG
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 18, 1986
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Quality Control Attendant to the Analysis of Samples
from the Texaco, Wyoming Facility
FROM: Ken Partymillcr, Chemist
PRC Environmental Management
•
THRU: Paul H. Friedman, Chemist*
Studies and Methods Branch (WH-562B)
TO: HWGWTF: Tony Montrone*
Gareth Pearson (EPA 8231)*
Richard Steimle*
Ed Berg (EPA 8214)*
Juanita Hillman, Region VIII
John Haggard, Region VIII
This memo summarizes the evaluation of the quality control data generated by
the Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force (HWGWTF) contract analytical
laboratories (1). This evaluation and subsequent conclusions pertain to the data
from the Texaco, Wyoming sampling effort by the Hazardous Waste Ground-Water
Task Force.
The objective of this evaluation is to give users of the analytical data a more
precise understanding of the limitations of the data as well as their appropriate use.
A second objective is to identify weaknesses in the data generation process for
correction. This correction may act on future analyses at this or other sites.
The evaluation was carried out on information provided in the accompanying
quality control reports (2-3) which contain raw data, statistically transformed data,
and graphically transformed data.
The evaluation process consisted of three steps. Step one consisted of
generation of a package which presents the results of quality control
* HWGWTF Data Evaluation Committee Member
-------
procedures, including the generation of data quality indicators, synopses of
statistical indicators, and the results of technical qualifier inspections. A report on
the results of the performance evaluation standards analyzed by the laboratory was
also generated. Step.two. was.an independent examination of the quality control
package and the performance evaluation sample results by members of the Data
Evaluation Committee. This was followed by a meeting (teleconference) of the Data
Evaluation Committee to discuss the foregoing data and data presentations. These
discussions were to come to a consensus, if possible, concerning the appropriate use
of the data within the context of the HWGWTF objectives. The discussions were
also to detect and discuss specific or general inadequacies of the data and to
determine if these are correctable or inherent in the analytical process.
Preface
The data user should review the pertinent materials contained in the
accompanying reports (2-3). Questions generated in the interpretation of these data
relative to sampling and analysis should be referred to Rich Steimle of the
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force.
I. Site Overview
The Texaco facility includes a landfarm and is located in Wyoming. No other
information on the facility was available to the HWGWTF teleconference.
Twenty-five field samples including a field blank (MQO587/QO587), three
equipment blanks (MQO594/QO594, MQO595/QO595, and MQO600/QO600), one trip
blank (MQO582/QO582), and a pair of duplicate samples (well M36, MQO588/QO588
and MQO590/QO590) were collected at this..Cacility. Samples MQO596/QO596,
MQ0599/QO599, and MQO804/QO804 were medium concentration ground-water
samples. Samples MQO802/QO802, MQO803/QOS03, and MQ0805/QO805 were low
concentration surface water samples. All other samples were low concentration
ground-water samples.
II. Evaluation of Quality Control Data and Analytical Data
1.0 Metals
1.1 Performance Evaluation Standards
Metal analytc performance evaluation standards were not evaluated in
conjunction with the samples collected from this facility.
1.2 Metals QC Evaluation
For the low concentration ground-water samples, tot!al metal spike recoveries
were calculated for sixteen ICP analytes spiked into sample MQO588 and for six
graphite furnace AA analytes plus mercury spiked into sample MQO589. Nineteen of
the twenty-three metal spike recoveries from the low concentration ground-water
samples were within the data quality objectives (DQOs) for this Program. The
aluminum, iron, and zinc average spike recoveries were outside DQO with values of
4, 74, and 58 percent, respectively. The sodium spike recovery was not calculated
because the sodium concentration in the sample was greater than four times the
concentration of the spike. Spike recoveries for these metals in the low
concentration ground-water samples are listed in Table 3-la of Reference 2 as well
as in the following Sections. A listing of which samples were spiked for each
analyte is also available in Table 3-2a of Reference 2.
-------
For the medium concentration samples, total metal spike recoveries were
calculated for sixteen ICP analytes and six graphite furnace AA analytes spiked into
sample MQO804 and for mercury spiked into sample MQO804. Twenty of the
-.I-.. • _. twenty-three metal.spike reco.veries from the medium concentration spiked samples--
were within DQOs. The magnesium and manganese spike recoveries were outside
DQO with values of 69 and 72 percent. The sodium spike recovery was not
calculated because the sodium concentration in the sample was greater than four
times the concentration of the spike. Spike recoveries for these metals in the
medium concentration samples are listed in Table 3-lb of Reference 2 as well as in
the following Sections. A listing of which samples were spiked for each analyte is
also available in Table 3-2b of Reference 2.
All reported laboratory control sample (LCS) recoveries and all calibration
verification standard (CVS) recoveries were within Program DQOs.
The average relative percent differences (RPDs) for fifteen of the seventeen
metallic analytes in ground-water, for which RPDs could be calculated, were within
the DQOs. RPDs for aluminum and zinc were outside DQO and no RPDs could be
calculated for beryllium, cadmium, copper, mercury, silver, and thallium because one
or both of the duplicate values were Jess than the contract required detection limit
(CRDL). The average RPDs for all metallic analytes in the medium concentration
samples for which RPDs could be calculated were within the DQOs. RPDs for
aluminum, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury,
nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc could not be calculated because
one or both of the duplicate values were less than the CRDL.
Required analyses were performed on all metals samples submitted to the
laboratory.
No contamination was reported in the laboratory blanks. Aluminum and iron
contamination was detected in the equipment blank (MQO600) at 389 and 107 ug/L,
respectively. Both of these values arc above their respective CRDLs of 200 and 100
ug/L.
1.3 Furnace Metals
The graphite furnace AA metals (antimony, arsenic, cadmium, lead, selenium,
and thallium) quality control was acceptable unless specifically noted.
The analytical spike recoveries for antimony in sample MQO591 were below the
DQO limit. The duplicate injection relative standard deviation (RSD) for antimony
in sample MQO586 was below the DQO acceptance range and the results for this
sample should be considered qualitative. All antimony results, except those for
sample MQO586 and 591 should be considered quantitative. Antimony results for
sample MQO586 should be considered qualitative and antimony results for MQO591
should be considered unreliable.
No problems were detected with the arsenic data. All arsenic results should
be considered quantitative.
No problems were detected with the cadmium data. All cadmium results should
be considered quantitative.
The correlation coefficients for the method of standard addition (MSA) analysis
of lead in samples MQO588 and 596 were outside of DQO. All lead results, with the
exception of samples MQO588 and 596, should be considered quantitative. Lead
-------
results for sample MQO588 should be considered qualitative and results for MQO596
should be considered unreliable.
The field .duplicate. prccision_for selenium in the duplicate-pair (MQO588/590)
was poor with 99 ug/L of selenium reported in sample MQO588 and 74 ug/L
reported in MQO590. The selenium CRDL is 5 ug/L and the instrument detection
limit (IDL) is 3 ug/L. The comparative precision of the field duplicate results is
not used in the evaluation of sample results as it is not possible to determine the
source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision is reported for informational
purposes only. All selenium results should be considered quantitative.
No problems were detected with the thallium data. All thallium results should
be considered quantitative.
1.4 TCP Metals
One of the equipment blanks contained aluminum and iron contamination at
concentrations greater than the CRDL. Equipment blank MQO600 contained 389
ug/L of aluminum and 107 ug/L of iron. As a HWGWTF convention, all results
greater than ten times the highest sampling blank concentration or less than the
instrument detection limit are considered quantitative (unless there are other
problems with the data). Results greater than five but less than ten times the
highest concentration of sampling blank contamination are considered qualitative and
all other data are considered unusable. As a result of this blank contamination,
iron results for samples MQO583 and 586 and aluminum results for samples MQO588,
590, 592, and 596 should be considered qualitative and the iron results for sample
MQO803 and aluminum results for samples MQO583, 584, 585, 597, 599, 801, 802, 803,
804, and 805 should be considered unusable. Because of other sampling and/or .
analysis problems, the usability of the iron and aluminum results summarized here is
only an upper limit and ether quality control problems could lower the above
usability determinations.
The low level (twice CRDL) linear range checks for beryllium, chromium,
copper, and silver had poor recoveries. The low level linear range check is an
analysis of a solution with elemental concentrations near the detection limit. The
range check analysis shows the accuracy which can be expected by the method for
results near the detection limits. The accuracy reported for these elements is not
unexpected. Beryllium results for all samples were affected and the results should
be considered biased low. Chromium and silver results for samples MQO582, 583,
584, 585, 586, 587, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, and 801
were affected and should be considered biased low. Copper and silver results for
samples MQO588, 802, 803, 804, 805, and 806 should be considered to be biased low.
Individual spike recoveries were outside DQO for aluminum, iron, and zinc in
low concentration ground-water sample MQO588 with reported recoveries of 4, 74,
and 58 percent, respectively. Low spike recoveries usually indicate results which
are biased low. Positive aluminum results from low concentration ground-water
samples should be considered qualitative and biased very low. Negative aluminum
results from these same samples should be considered unusable due to a high
probability of false negatives. All iron results from the low concentration ground-
water samples should be considered to be biased low and semi-quantitative. All zinc
results from the low concentration ground-water samples should be considered to be
biased low and qualitative.
Laboratory duplicate results for aluminum in low concentration ground-water
sample MQO588 were outside DQO with an RPD of 85 percent.
-------
The high sulfate concentrations do not appear to have affected the barium
analyses as both the internal control standard and the spike recoveries for barium
were acceptable. :
The field duplicate precision for zinc in the duplicate pair (MQO588/590) was
poor with 120 ug/L of zinc reported in sample MQO588 and 34 ug/L reported in
MQO590. The zinc CRDL is -20 ug/L. The comparative precision of the field
duplicate results is not used in the evaluation -of sample results as it is not possible
to determine the source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision is reported
for informational purposes only.
All barium, beryllium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, magnesium,
manganese, nickel, potassium, silver, sodium, and vanadium results should be
considered quantitative. Medium concentration matrix aluminum (with exceptions),
iron, and zinc results should also be considered quantitative. The low concentration
matrix iron results, with three exceptions, should be considered semi-quantitative.
The low concentration matrix results for iron in samples MQO583 and 586, all of
the low concentration matrix results for zinc, the low concentration matrix positive
aluminum results for samples MQO588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 598, and 806, and the
medium concentration aluminum results for sample MQO596 should be considered
qualitative. All negative low concentration matrix aluminum results, positive low
concentration matrix aluminum results for samples MQO583, 584, 585, 597, 599, and
801, the medium concentration aluminum results for samples MQO802, 803, 804, and
805, and low concentration results for iron in sample MQO803 should be not be used
due to blank contamination.
1.5 Mercurv
No problems were detected with the mercury data. All mercury results should
be considered quantitative with an acceptable probability of false negatives.
2.0 Inorganic and Indicator Analvtes
2.1 Performance Evaluation Standard
Inorganic and indicator analyte performance evaluation standards were not
evaluated in conjunction with the samples collected from this facility.
2.2 Inorganic and Indicator Analvte OC "Evaluation
The spike recoveries of all of the inorganic and indicator analytes, except for
cyanide in the low concentration ground-water sample, were within the accuracy
DQOs (accuracy DQOs have not been established for bromide and nitfite nitrogen
matrix spikes). The cyanide spike recovery was zero percent in the low
concentration sample. The bromide and nitrite nitrogen spike recoveries were 110
and 102 percent in the low concentration ground-water sample and 97 and 102
percent in the medium concentration sample. This indicates acceptable recoveries
for all inorganic and indicator analytes except for cyanide in the low concentration
sample.
All LCS and CVS recoveries reported in the raw data for inorganic and
indicator analytes were within Program DQOs except for three CCVs for ammonia
nitrogen.
All calculable RPDs for the inorganic and indicator analytes were within
Program DQOs. RPDs for six of twelve analytes from the low concentration sample
-------
and five of the twelve from the medium concentration samples were not able to be
calculated as either the sample or the duplicate value was less than the CRDL.
Precision DQOs have not been established for bromide and nitrite nitrogen.
Requested analyses were performed on all samples for the inorganic and
indicator analytes.
No laboratory blank contamination was reported for any inorganic or indicator
analyte. Contamination involving TOC and total phenols was found in the equipment
and the trip blanks at levels above CRDL. These contaminants and their
concentrations are listed below, as well as in Section 3.2.4 (page 3-3) of Reference
2.
2.3 Inorganic and Indicator Analvte Data
No quality control problems were identified with the chloride, bromide, and
sulfate data. All results for these analytes should be considered quantitative. The
chloride field duplicate precision for the duplicate pair MQO588/599 was poor
(100,000 versus 80,000 ug/L). The comparative precision of the field duplicate
results is not used in the evaluation of sample results as it is not possible to
determine the source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision is reported for
informational purposes only.
The 48 hour holding time for nitrate and nitrite nitrogen was exceeded for
samples MQO589, 593, 597, 801, and 802 and results for these samples should be
considered semi-quantitative. All other nitrate and nitrite nitrogen results should
be considered quantitative.
The low concentration matrix cyanide spike recovery for sample MQO588 had.
zero percent recovery. Ail low concentration matrix cyanide results below the
detection limit (non-detects) should not be used. All positive low concentration
results (samples MQO552, 585, 586, 592, 593, and 597) should be considered
qualitative. All medium concentration matrix results (samples MQO596, 599, 802,
803, 804, and 805) should be considered quantitative with an acceptable probability
of false negatives.
The ammonia nitrogen continuing calibration verifications (CCVs) were outside
the Program DQO for accuracy. The analytical instrument should have been
recalibrated and the preceding samples reanalyzed. Because of this problem, results
for samples MQO582, 583, 584, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, and 806 should be considered
semi-quantitative. The ammonia nitrogen spike recovery for the medium
concentration matrix was above DQO. As a result, all medium concentration matrix
ammonia nitrogen results should be considered semi-quantitative. This includes
samples MQO596, 599, 802, 803, 804, and 805. Results for all ammonia nitrogen
samples not mentioned above should be considered quantitative.
The total phenols analysis date for Run #2 was not indicated in the raw data
or on the worksheet. The total phenols field duplicate precision for the duplicate
pair MQO588/599 was poor (394,000 versus 284,000 ug/L). The comparative precision
of the field duplicate results is not used in the evaluation of sample results as it is
not possible to determine the source of this imprecision. Field duplicate precision
is reported" for informational purposes only. Total phenol contamination was found
in the equipment blanks (MQO594, 595, and 600) and the trip blank (MQO582) at
concentrations of 43, 16, 41, and 86 ug/L, respectively. These values arc above the
total phenol CRDL of 10 ug/L. Based upon HWGWTF conventions, all total phenols
results greater than 10 times the highest concentration of total phenols in the
-------
sampling blanks or less than the detection limit are considered quantitative. All
total phenols results greater than five but less than ten times the highest
concentration of sampling blank contamination arc considered qualitative and all
'other data are considered unusable:-- Total phenols results for samples MQO592..593. ..
596, 597, 801, 802, 803, 804, and 806 should not be used. All other total phenols
results should be considered quantitative.
A continuing calibration blank (CCB) was not analyzed at the end of the TOC
analytical batch. Two equipment blanks (MQO595 and 600) and the trip blank
(MQO582) contained TOC at concentrations of 1300, 3900, and 2200 ug/L which were
above the CRDL for TOC of 1000 ug/L. Again, as a HWGWTF convention, all TOC
results greater that ten times the highest field blank concentration or less than the
detection limit should be considered quantitative. All TOC results greater than five
but less than ten times the highest concentration of sampling blank contamination
are considered qualitative and all other data are considered unusable. The TOC
results for samples MQO589, 592, 593, 596, 597, 801, 802, and 803 should be
considered qualitative and the TOC results for samples MQO583, 584, 598, and 806
should not be used. Results for all other TOC samples should be considered
quantitative.
Initial calibration verification (ICV) and CCV standards for POC were not
analyzed. .A POC spike solution was run three times during the analytical batch but
the "true" value of the spike was not provided by the laboratory. EPA needs to
supply the inorganic laboratory with a POC calibration verification solution. Until
then, the instrument calibration can not be assessed. The POC results should be
considered qualitative.
The TOX analysis was run over a period of four days. Although the date of.
analysis is indicated on the laboratory worksheets, it is not clear when each day's
run began and ended. It is not evident if a final CCV and final CCB were run at
the end and if an ICV and initial calibration blank (ICB) were run at the beginning
of all of the analytical batch. The TOX results should be considered semi-
quantitative for samples MQO584, 585, 586, 587, 597, 599, and 600 because of this.
All other TOX results should be considered quantitative.
CCBs were not run during or at the end of the POX analytical batch. The
holding times for POX samples ranged from 10 to 14 days which exceeds the
recommended holding time of seven days. POX results for all samples should be
considered semi-quantitative.
3.0 Organics and Pesticides
3.1 Performance Evaluation Standard
Organic performance evaluation standards were riot evaluated in conjunction
with the samples collected from this facility.
3.2 Organic QC Evaluation
Eight of twenty-two matrix spike average recoveries from the low
concentration matrix samples were outside the established Program DQOs for
accuracy. Individual matrix spike recoveries which were outside the accuracy DQO
will be discussed in the appropriate Sections below. No organic matrix spikes were
added to the medium concentration samples. All surrogate spike average recoveries
from both low and medium concentration samples were within DQOs for accuracy.
-------
Individual surrogate spike recoveries which were outside the accuracy DQO will be
discussed in the appropriate Sections below.
All matrix spike/matrix .spike, duplicate average RPDs were .within Program . -
DQOs for precision. Individual matrix spike RPDs which were outside the precision
DQO will be discussed in the appropriate Sections below. All average surrogate
spike RPDs met Program DQOs for precision.
All organic analyses were performed as requested.
Laboratory blank contamination was reported for organics and is discussed in
Reference 3 (for organics) as well as in the appropriate Sections below.
Detection limits for the organic fractions are summarized in Reference 3 (for
organics) as well as in the appropriate Sections below.
3.3 Volatiles
Quality control data indicate that volatile organics were determined acceptably.
The chromatograms appear acceptable. Initial and continuing calibrations, tunings
and mass calibrations, blanks, matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates, and
surrogate spikes are acceptable.
Estimated method detection limits were CRDL for all volatile samples except
QO587 (2 times CRDL), 588 (25 times), 590 (23 times), 594 (2 times), 596 (10 times),
599 (45 times), 801 (9 times), and 804 (6 times). Dilution of these samples was
required due to the presence of high concentrations of organics and, especially for
samples QO588, 590, 596, 599, and 801, may. result in false negatives. . .
Acetone and methylene chloride were found in instrument blank CB860818B12
at concentrations below the CRDL. This did not affect the data evaluation.
Samples QO588 and 590 were screened by the laboratory for volatile analysis
and determined to be medium concentration samples. The traffic reports labeled the
samples as low concentration samples.
The volatiles data are acceptable. The volatile compound results should be
considered quantitative with the exception of samples QO588, 590, 596, 599, and 801
which should be considered semi-quantitative due to an increased probability of
false negative results. The probability of false negative results for all other
samples is acceptable.
3.4 Semivolatiles '
Initial and continuing calibrations, tuning and mass calibrations, blanks, and
chromatograms were acceptable for the semivolatiles. Some problems were
encountered with matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate recoveries, surrogate
recoveries, and holding times.
The estimated detection limits for the semivolatiles are twice CRDL except for
samples QO585 (8 times CRDL), 586 (20 times), 588 (1000 times), 590 (800 times),
591 (20 times), 596 (20 times), 599 (20 times),-and 804 (40 times) due to required
dilutions.
Semivolatile surrogate compounds were not recovered from samples QO588,
588MS, 588MSD, 590, 599, and 804 due to high dilutions.
-------
The semivolatile matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate compounds were not
recovered from sample QO588 due to the 1000 fold dilution of the sample. The
matrix spike duplicate recovery of pyrene (145 percent) from sample QO806 was
above the DQO of-26. to.127 percent... The RPD between .matrix spike and.matrix .
spike duplicate recovery of 4-nitrophenol in sample QO806 was above DQO.
Contamination was detected in laboratory blank GH096358C22. The blank
contained bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate at less than the CRDL. This did not impact the
data.
The semivolatile data are acceptable and the results should be considered
quantitative for all samples except QO586, 591, and 596 which should be considered
semi-quantitative and QO588, 590, 599, and 804 which should be considered
qualitative. The semi-quantitative and qualitative samples were of diminished quality
due to increased probabilities of false negatives due to dilution.
3.5 Pesticides
The initial and continuing calibrations, blanks, matrix spike/matrix spike
duplicates, and chromatography for pesticides were generally acceptable.
The estimated method detection limits for the pesticides fraction were CRDL
for all samples except for samples QO585 (10 times CRDL), 588 (20 times), 590 (20
times), 591 (2 times), 596 (2 times), 598 (2 times), 802 (2 times), and 804 (2 times)
due to required dilutions. The high dilutions of samples Q0585, 588, and 590 may
result in false negatives.
.The pesticide matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate compounds were, not .
recovered from sample QO588 due to high dilution.
Dibutylchlorendatc was not recovered from samples QO585, 588, and 590 due to
high dilutions after surrogate addition. The dibutylchlorendate recovery (21
percent) from sample QO599 was below DQO limits.
The dibutylchlorendate shift was found using the improper Eval Mix. Samples
QO585, 591, 804, and 805 had a retention time shift greater than the 2 percent
difference criteria. The dibutylchlorendate peak from the surrogate spike was
missing from chromatograms for samples QO588, 590, and 598.
Aldrin was tentatively identified in the pesticide chromatogram of sample
QO590 by the EMSL/Las Vegas data reviewers.
The pesticides'results should be considered qualitative. There is an enhanced
probability of false negatives in several samples due to dilutions.
III. Data Usability Summary
4.0 Graphite Furnace Metals
Quantitative: all arsenic, cadmium, thallium, and selenium results; antimony
and lead results with exceptions
Qualitative: antimony results for sample MQO586 and lead results for
sample MQO588
-------
Unreliable: antimony results for sample MQO591 and lead results for sample
MQO596
4.1 TCP Metals . _ .
Quantitative: all barium, beryllium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper,
magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, silver, sodium, and
vanadium results and medium-concentration matrix results for
aluminum with exceptions and iron and zinc
Semi-quantitative: low concentration matrix iron results with exceptions
listed below
Qualitative: low concentration matrix positive aluminum results for samples
MQO588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 598, and 806; medium
concentration aluminum results for sample MQO596; low
concentration matrix zinc results; and low concentration matrix
iron results for samples MQO583 and 586
Unusable: low concentration matrix negative aluminum results; low
concentration matrix positive aluminum results for samples
MQO583, 584, 585, 597, 599, and 801; iron results for sample
MQO803
4.2 Mercurv
Quantitative: all mercury results
4.3 Inorganic and Indicator Analvtes
Quantitative: all chloride, bromide, and sulfatc results; nitrate nitrogen,
nitrite nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, total phenols, TOC, and TOX
results with exceptions; and cyanide results for samples MQO596,
599, 802, 803, 804, and 805
Semi-quantitative: all POX results; ammonia nitrogen results for samples
MQO582, 583, 584, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, and 806; nitrate and
nitrite nitrogen results for samples MQO589, 593, 597, 801, and
802; TOC results for samples MQO589, 592, 593, 596, 597, 801,
802, and 803; and TOX results for samples MQO584, 585, 586,
587, 597, 599, and 600
Qualitative: all'POC results; and cyanide results for samples MQO552, 585,
586, 592, 593, and 597
Unusable: ' cyanide results with the above exceptions; total phenols results
for samples MQO592, 593, 596, 597, 801, 802, 803, 804, and 806;
and TOC results for samples MQO583, 584, 598, and 806
4.4 Organics
Quantitative: volatile and semivolatile results with exceptions
-------
Semi-quantitative: volatile results for samples QO588, 590, 596, 599, and 801;
semivolatile results for samples QO586, 591, and 596; and
positive semivolatile results for samples QO588, 590, 599, and
.804
Qualitative: all pesticides results; all negative (non-detect) semivolatile
results for samples QO588, 590, 599, and 804 are qualified by a
higher than usual probalility of false negative results due to dilution
IV. References
1. Organic Analyses: CompuChem Laboratories, Inc.
P.O. Box 12652
3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
(919) 549-8263
Inorganic and Indicator Analyses:
Centec -Laboratories
P.O. Box 956
2160 Industrial Drive
Salem, VA 24153
(703) 387-3995
2. Draft Quality Control Data Evaluation Report (Assessment of the Usability of
the Data Generated) for site 34, Texaco, WY, 11/10/1986, Prepared by
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Company, Inc., for the US EPA
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task .Force.
3. Draft Inorganic Data Usability Audit Report and Draft Organic Data Usability
Report, for the Texaco, Wyoming site, Prepared by Laboratory Performance
Monitoring Group, Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Co., Las
Vegas, Nevada, for US EPA, EMSL/Las Vegas, 11/10/1986.
-------
V. Addressees
Ed Berg
Chief, Project Management Section, Quality Assurance JBrandi,. EMSL/CI
US Environmental Protection Agency
2.6 West St. Clair Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Anthony Montrone
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force, OSWER (WH-562A)
US Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Gareth Pearson
Quality Assurance Division
US EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory - Las Vegas
P.O. Box 1198
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Richard Steimle
Hazardous Waste Ground-Water Task Force, OSWER (WH-562A)
US Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Juanita Hillman
US Environmental Protection Agency .. - - .
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, CO 80295
John Haggard
US Environmental Protection Agency
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, CO 80295
Paul Friedman
Characterization and Assessment Division, OSW (WH-562B)
US Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Chuck Hoover
Laboratory Performance Monitoring Group
Lockheed Engineering and Management Services Company
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
-------
-
d?"&i \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION VIII
999 18th STREET-SUITE 500
DENVER, COLORADO 80202-2405
REF SRC " GEC 3 i 1«du
Mr. W. E. Rickart
Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.
P.O. Box 307
Evansville, Wyoming 82636
Dedr Mr. Rickart:
With this letter we are hereby transmitting copies of analytical data
fro.n samples taken by the Ground Water Task Force of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, at the Texaco Casper Refinery during the week of
August 11, 1986. The'data indicates that ground water on both the north and
south sides of the North Platte River contain significant concentrations of
hazardous constituents that could impact human health and the environment.
Based upon this data and the information available on Texaco's past and
present waste management practices at the Casper Refinery, EPA has determined
that there is or has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents thereof
from your facility. In order to address this release, EPA intends to issue an
order requiring corrective action or other appropriate response measure as
necessary to protect human health or the environment.
This corrective action order will be issued pursuant to EPA.'s authority
under section 3003(h) 'of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as
ainandad by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). We
anticipate that the order will address site investigation and corrective
measures for the known ground water contamination as well as any newly
identified or potential sources of contamination.
As a related matter, EPA has also learned that Texaco intends to proceed
with a ground water quality cleanup program that involves the flushing of
degraded ground water with river water placed in the chemical evaporation
pond, ("Evaluation of Groundwater Cleanup Options, Casper Texaco Refinery
North Property (Final Draft)", dated October 27, 1986.) While this cleanup
option has been presented Dy Texaco as a means for "enhancing" natural
attenuation, it is EPA's view that the ground water flushing could result in
higher concentrations of hazardous wastes or constituents in the alluvial
aquifer by the river and a greater liklihood that a threat to human health or
the environment will occur. EPA believes that this program should not be
initiated until further investigation and study on the influence of your
activities on contaminant movement at the facility has been completed.
The ground water contamination at the Texaco Casper Refinery is a serious
onmental concern.
company to discuss act
environmental concern. We would like to meet with representatives of your
:ions that must be taken at the site.
-------
- 2 -
We look forward to hearing from you within the next ten days. If you
have any questions, please call John Haggard at (303) 293-1511 or
Elizabeth Bohanon, Office of Regional Counsel-at (303) -293-1290. ' -•" •
Robert L.TJuprey, Director
Waste Management Division
cc: /Mr. Bill Garland, UDEQ
»Ms. Deborah Sherer, EPA Region VIII
Ms. Elizabeth Bohanon, EPA Region VIII
Mr. Anthony Hontrone, Ground Water Task Force
Mr. Mark Reinhardt, Esq., Texaco, Inc.
-------
APPENDIX I
-------
Accu-Labs Research, Inc.
11485 W. 48th Avenue Wheat Ridge. Colorado 80033
(303) 423-2766
September 16, 1986
Page 1 "oT 2
Mr. Dale Tischmak
Western Water Consultants, Inc.
P.O. Box 4128
Laramie, WY 82071
RE: 8719-22498-3
Date Samples Rec'd 8-13-86
COMPLETED REPORT
ALR Designation
Sponsor Designation
Determination mg/L
Aluminum, total
Antimony, total
Arsenic, total
Barium, total
Beryllium, total
Cadmium, total
Calcium, total
Chromium, total
Cobalt, total
Copper, total
Iron, total
Magnesium, total
Manganese, total
Mercury, total
Nickel, total
Potassium, total
Selenium, total
Silver, total
Sodium, total
Thallium, total
Tin, total
Vanadium, total
Lead, total
Cyanide
Ammonia (as N)
Chloride
Nitrate (as N)
TDS (at 180'C)
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
8719-22498-3-1
FAC-1
8-11-86
8719-22498-3-2
FAC-2
0.7
<0.005
<0.005
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
17
<0.005
<0.02
<0.005
0.78
5.4
0.036
<0.0001
0.04
2.8
<0.005
<0.005
190
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
0.4
<3
<0.05
580
<0.5
<0.005
<0.005
<0.2
.<0.005
0.018
240
0.012
0.05
0.006
2.2
75
0.21
0.0001
0.08
10
<0.005
<0.005
190
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
0.4
270
<0.05
1900
8719-22498-3-3
FAC-7
8-12-86
4.8
<0.005
<0.005
<0.2
<0.005
0.010
74
<0.005
0.04
<0.005
3.6
34
0.32
0.0002
0.03
10
<0.005
<0.005
94
<0.005
0.010
0.009
<0.005
<0.005
<0.2
18
3.3
720
-
£2070
-------
Accu-Labs Research, Inc.
September 16, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Dale Tischmak
Western Water Consultants, Inc.
RE: 8719-22498-3
Date Samples Rec'd 8-13-86
COMPLETED REPORT
ALR Designation
Sponsor Designation
Determination mg/L
Sulfate (as S04)
TOC
Total Organic Hal ides,
as Cl (pg/L)
Phenols
2 Solids-Total Solids
Zinc, total
POC
POX
Extractable Organics
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
8719-22498-3-1
FAC-1
8-11-86
130
5
5
0.005
650
3.4
8719-22498-3-2
FAC-2
8-11-86
740
7
7
0.009
1900
3.3
8719-22498-3-3
FAC-7
8-12-86
~
300
4
<3
0.006
950
0.035
These samples are scheduled to be discarded 30 days after the date of this
report.
CCS/dh .
CathyJCairns Shugarts/y
Water Laboratory
Supervisor
-------
Accu-Labs Research, Inc.
11485 W. 48th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
(303) 423-2766 _
September 16, 1986
Page 1 of 2
Mr. Dale Tischmak
Western Water Consultants,
P.O. Box 4128
Laramie, WY 82071
Inc.
RE: 8719-22508-3
Date Samples Rec'd 8-14-86
COMPLETED REPORT
ALR Designation
Sponsor Designation
Determination mg/L.
Aluminum, total
Antimony, total
Arsenic, total
Barium, total
Beryllium, total
Cadmium, total
Calcium, total
Chromium, total
Cobalt, total
Copper, total
Iron, total
Magnesium, total
Manganese, total
Mercury, total
Nickel, total
Potassium, total
Selenium, total
Silver, total
Sodium, total
Thallium, total
Tin, total
Vanadium, total
Lead, total
Cyanide
Ammonia (as N)
Chloride
Nitrate (as N)
TDS (at 180°C)
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
8719-22508-3-1
FAC-9
8JJ-86
£ A-jV)
5.2
<0.005
<0.005
<0.2
<0.005
0.018
200
0.016
0.04
0.020
7.7
98
0.83
<0.0001
0.10
17
<0.005
0.006
390
<0.01*
0.023
0.012
0.012
0.15
0.20
70
0.36
2400
8719-22508-3-2
FAC-10
8^13-86
C *'-O
4.1
<0.005
0.011
<0.2
<0.005 . -
0.013
70
0.011
<0.02
0.015
20
64
2.4
••
-------
Accu-Labs Research, Inc.
September 16, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Dale Tischmak
Western Water Consultants, Inc.
RE: 8719-22508-3
Date Samples Rec'd 8-14-86
COMPLETED REPORT
ALR Designation
Sponsor Designation
Determination mg/L
Sulfate (as S04)
TOC
Total Organic Hal ides,
as Cl (Mg/L)
Phenols
% Solids-Total Solids
Zinc, total
POC
POX
Extractable Organics
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
8719-22508-3-1
FAC-9
8-I3r86
8719-22508-3-2
FAC-10
JdL3-86
8719-22508-3-3
FAC-13
8-13-86
1100
24
27
0.011
3400
0.060
490
34
9
0.044
1900
4.8
490
36
8
0.056
2000
1.5
These samples are scheduled to be discarded 30 days after the date of this
report.
Q ' At /-
L^/l/TU^ %sM^u^g 0.1A&-
CCS/dh
44-
Cathy/fCairns Shdgarts/7
Water Laboratory ^
Supervisor
-------
Accu-Labs Research, Inc.
11485 W. 48th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
(303) 423-2766
September 16, 1986
Page 1 of 2
Mr. Dale Tischmak
Western Water Consultants, Inc.
P.O. Box 4128
Laramie, WY 82071
RE: 8719-22515-2
Date Samples Rec'd 8-15-86
COMPLETED REPORT
A.MJE,. VVY. 82070
ALR Designation
Sponsor Designation
Determination: mg/L
Aluminum, total
Antimony, total
Arsenic, total
Barium, total
Beryllium, total
Cadmium, total
Calcium, total
Chromium, total
Cobalt, total
Copper, total
Iron, total
Magnesium, total
Manganese, total
Mercury, total
Nickel, total
Potassium, total
Selenium, total
Silver, total
Sodium, total
Thallium, total
Tin, total
Vanadium, total
Lead, total
Zinc, total
Cyanide
Ammonia (as N)
Chloride
Nitrate (as N)
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
8719-22515-2-1
FAC-12
8719-22515-2-2
FAC-21
1.2
<0.005
0.012
1.3
<0.005
0.009
110
<0.005
<0.02
<0.005
20
72
1.5
<0.0001
0.05
4.0
<0.005
<0.005
140
<0.005
0.006
0.008
<0.005
0.033
0.018
15
41
<0.05
<0.5
<0.005
<0.005
1.1
<0.005
<0.005
40
<0.005
<0.02
<0.005
4.5
71
0.75
<0.0001
0.05
3.0
<0.005
<0.005
110
<0.005
0.011
<0.005
0.007
2.2
<0.005
0.3
31
<0.05
-------
Accu-Labs Research, Inc.
September 16, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Dale Tischmak
Western Water Consultants, Inc.
RE: 8719-22515-2
Date Samples Rec'd 8-15-86
COMPLETED REPORT
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
ALR Designation 8719-22515-2-1 8719-22515-2-2
Sponsor Designation FAC-12 FAC-21
Determination: mg/L
Z Solids-Total Solids 1100 700
Sulfate (as S04) 50 <5
TOC 41 24
Total Organic Halides,
as Cl (ug/L) 29 19
Phenols 0.29 0.033
TDS (at 180°C) 1000 700
POC
POX .....
Extractable Organics
These samples are scheduled to be disposed' of 30 days after the -date of this
report.
CathVl Cairns Shugatts
Water Laboratory ^
CCS/dh ,. Supervisor
-------
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Accu-Labs
OC, POX
arameter
urgable organic carbon
'urgable organic halogen
Units
61901-01
61901-02
. mg/L
ug Cl/L
f
ND
fi\-U
k "(o.i)
(5)
0.3
ND
"•"(o.V)'"
(5)
ND
ND
6l9tU-03
(5)
0.1
ND
(U7T)
(5)
'OC, POX
'arameter
'urgable organic carbon
'urgable organic halogen
Units
61901-'05
61901-06
X61-901-07
mg/L
ug Cl/L
0.2
ND
(0.1)
(5)
0.2
ND
(0.1)
(5)
15
ND
(0.1)
(5)
9.6
ND
(0.1)
(5)
ID = Not Detected.
Detection limits in parentheses.
-------
ug/L
u'g/L
ug/L
ug/L
[ISL BASE/NEUTRAL ORGANICS
Parameter Units
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butylbenzyl phthalate
4-Chloroaniline
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
?luoranthene
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Accu-Labs
<
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
A-M
IStJl-Ol
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
.. BDL
•' BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
61901-02
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
901-03
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5) •'
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
3DL = Below Detection Limit.
Detection limits in pnrentheses.
-------
r\OL.r\y i«i uui i tu i
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Aecu-Labs
IISL BASE/NEUTRAL ORGANICS (CONT.)
Parameter Units
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzcne
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine*
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzcne
T901-01
61901-03
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5) .-
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL = Below Detection Limit. *Measured as diphenylamine. Detection limits in parentheses.
-------
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Accu-Labs
HSL BASE/NEUTRAL ORGANICS
Parameter Units
Acenaphthene ug/L
Acenaphthylene ug/L
Anthracene ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L
Benzyl alcohol ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L
Bis(2-chJoroethyl)ether ug/L
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ug/L
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthaJate ug/L
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L
Butylbenzyl phthalate ug/L
4-Chloroanilme ug/L
2-Chloronaphthalene ug/L
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L
Chrysene ug/L
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L
Dibenzofuran ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L
Diethyl phthalate ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate ug/L
Di-n-butyl phthalate ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthnlatc ug/L
Fluoranthene ug/L
¥
GH
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
mT^
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
6YSD-07
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
12
BDL
11
5
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
8
BDL
12
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5) .-
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
61901-08
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
iii
(20)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL = Below Detection Limit.
Detection limits in parentheses.
-------
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Accu-Labs
HSL BASE/NEUTRAL ORGANICS (CONT.)
Parameter Units
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadienc
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexochloroethanc
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine*
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
61901-08
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
UE/L
UE/L
UB/L
ug/L
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
28
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
480
190
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
18
110
22
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5) '
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
170
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
3DL = Below Detection Limit. *Measured as diphenylamine. Detection limits in parentheses.
-------
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Accu-Labs
nucny mountain Miia m .
HSL ACID ORGANTICS
Parameter
Benzole acid
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
(
DDL
DDL
DDL
BDL
DDL
DDL
DDL
DDL
DDL
DDL
DDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
A<-0
11190 i-oi
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL = Below Detection Limit.
Detection limits in parentheses.
-------
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Accu-Labs
HSL ACID ORGANTCS
Parameter
Benzoic acid
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,G-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Units
61901-05
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
^T9DT-06
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
>T9TJ1-07
BDL
BDL
BDL
41
BDL
BDL
11
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
120
BDL
BDL
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5) ,
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(25)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
BDL = Below Detection Limit.
Detection limits in parentheses.
10
-------
Rocky Mountain Ana., .cal Labored
[ISL VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
3romomethane
2-Butanone
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromo methane
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dichlorobromo methane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethone
L, 1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
:is-l,3-Dichloropropene
:rans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Zthylbenzene
J-Hexanone
vtethlylene chloride
l-Methyl-2-pentanone
Jtyrene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Petrachloroethene
'"oluene
,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
,1,1-Tri chloroethane
,1,2-Tri Chloroethane
"richloroethene
'inyl Acetate
'inyl chloride
'otal Xylenes
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
C
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
JkJJ
"61901-01
(50)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(50)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
A ecu-Labs
(
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
•! BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
TODT-TM
(50)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(50)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
( M- 3-O
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(50)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(50)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5) ••
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(50)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(50)
(5)
(5)
(5)
.(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
IDL = Below Detection Limit.
Detection limits in parentheses.
-------
iviuuniam MI it.
HSL VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
2-Butanone
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromo methane
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dichlorobromo methane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroe thane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlpropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans-l,3-DichJoropropene
Ethylbenzene
2-Hexanone
Methlylene chloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Styrene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl chloride
Total Xylenes
Units
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
for
Aceu-Lnbs
—61301-05
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(50)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(50)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
-06
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
(50)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(50)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(10)
(10)
(5)
SD'1-07
320
810
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
36
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
1100
(250)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(250)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(50)
(25)
(50)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(50)
(50)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(50)
(25)
01-08
BDL
1400
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
200
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
39
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
460
(250)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(250)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(50)
(25)
(50)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(50)
(50)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(25)
(50)
(50)
(25)
BDL = Below Detection Limit. Detection limits in parentheses.
11
-------
ROCKY MOUNTAIN A . .iLYTICAL LABORATORY
Organic Annlyticnl Methodology
Parameter
Purgeables
Base/Neutrals
Acids
Organochlorine Pesticides/PCD's
Phcnoxy Herbicides
Total Organic Halogen (TOX)
Trihalomethanes (THM)
Dioxin
Purgenble Halocarbons
Purgeable Aromatics
Acrolein & Acrylonitrile
Phenols by GC
Benzidines
Phlhalate Esters
Nitrosamines
Nitroaromatics/isophorone
Polynuclear Aromntics
Haloethers
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Organophosphorns Pesticides
Triazine Pesticides
References
Units
Nominal
Detection Limit(a'
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
1
10
10
0.01
10
0.01
5
1
1
0.005,
0.01
1
100
10
0.1
10
1
1
0.5
1
"0.02
0.1
OJ
Methodology
Reference
(1)
Purge & Trap GC/MS 624
Extraction/GC/MS 625
Extraction/GC/MS 625
Extrnction/GC/ECD 608
Extraction/GC/MS 625
Extraction/GC/ECD (2)
Adsorption/Coulometric 450.1(3)
Extraction/GC/ECD (4)
Purge & Trap GC/MS (4)
Extraction/GC/MS/ECD 613
Purge & Trap/GC/Hall 601
Purge & Trap/GC/PID 602
Purge «Jc Trap/GC/FID 603
Extraction/GC/FID 604
Extraction/HPLC 605
Extraction/GC/FID 606
Extraction/GC/NPD 607
Extraetion/GC/FID & GC/ECD G09
Extraction/HPLC 610
Extraction/GC/Hall 611
Extraction/GC/ECD 612
Extraction/GC/NPD 622(5)
Extrnction/GC/NPD (6)
Preservation
Dottle No.
11
12
12
13
12
14
15
11
11
16
11
17
18
16
19
12
20
12
20
17
12
12
12
Maximum
Holding Time
14 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
14 days
14 days
7 days/40 days
14 days
14 days
14 days
7 days/40 days
7 dyas/40 days
7 days/40 days
1 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
7 days/40 days
(1) Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 233, Monday, December 3, 1979.
(2) "Method for Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid Herbicides in Industrial Effluents", Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 75, Part II.
(3) "Total Organic Halide", US EPA-EMSL, Cincinnati, November, 1980.
(4) Federal Register. Vol. 44, No. 231, Thursday, November 29, 1979, Appendix, Part I.
(5) "Method 622-Organophosphorus Pesticides", Proposed EPA Method, 304 (h) Committee.
(6) Federal Register. Vol. 38, No. 75, 1973.
Notes
Nominal values are the best achievable with the listed analytical method for a typical component. Interferences in specific samples may rer
in a higher detection limit.
Applicable to NPDES Wastes as updated by Robert C. Booth, Director, EMSL-Cincinnati, September 22, 1981. Where two times are given,
first refers to the time to extraction, the second to the time of instrumental analysis.
-------
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Organic Analytical Methodology (continued)
Preservation Bottle No.
11
17
18
16
19
12, 13, 14
20
15
Parameter Group
Purgeables
Purgeables
Purgeables
Extractables
Extractables
Extractables
Extractables
TOX
Dottle
'/O ml glass with teflon
lined silicone septum cap
'lO ml glass with teflon
lined silicone septum cap
'/O ml glass with teflon
lined silicone septum cap
1 liter glass with teflon
lined cap
1 liter glass with teflon
lined cap
1 liter glass with teflon
lined cap
1 liter glass with tefjon
lined cap
250 ml glass with teflon
lined cap, single
1 liter glass with teflon
lined cap, quad.
Preservation
(thiosulfate if CL present)
4°C, HC1 to pH less than 2
(thiosulfate if CJ- present)
4°C, adjust pH to i* - 5
(thiosulfate if CL present)
(thiosulfate if CL present)
'/°C, adjust pH to 2 - 7
(thiosulfate if Cl- present)
*/°C, store in dark *
(thiosulfate is C^ present)
4°C, store in dark
(thiosulfate if C1- present)
-------
r- •**- cc
*ZS UJ *.** C_»
WL, Cu t > 1-C _J
ULJ r- LX/ -^,
C*£ t3 — «— «•'
•x o*; ^ ---
x «^5i^ o:
0 C->
O? U"> U*>
x=> 0>
OJ C"J
-------
CP.EPIUF.BX
MIL: l.'13/M MCE 001
i>iri
*a
TEXACO CfiSPER REFMERV
EPrt GRGUHOUATER TASK FORCE SAMPLIHG EUEIIT. AUGUST 11-15. 1986
PARTIAL RESULTS OF flHALYSES OF SPLIT SAMPLES
PORT10H AHAIYZED BY TEXACO AI PARL
(all data oa/L)
SAKPLE 1
rt-ios
n-iod
n-36
n-uA
n-5ifls
1III.ET POH'J
hLLU'J.POHD
SS-4
'<_'M
JO VI
'.'. 4'j
PCS l.fJJIu
EW..PUMP
IfcW.EAUtP
1
l8t;r.6flIL£K
BEHZEHE 1
HD
HD
fl.2^
HO
HD
<0.01
HD
0.82
0.63
t.W
111-
i;l-
i
1 HO
I '
1 lit)
'TOLUEME 1
HO
1IC
0.42
hD
(ID
0.02
HD
O.C5
o.m
Ot e
. JJ
•;o.o;
i hi'
1 H9
1 HO
ETHVLBEH2EHE
liD
HD
HD
hi)
IID
0.02
HO
O.H
IID
(I.!1)
•r.
!ii'
!.[<
HO
XYLEHE 1
1
HO
IID
0.14
hi>
0.22
HD
HD
0.24
HO
4.27
•10.01
HO
HO
IID
CYfllilDE 1
---_--__-
1.70
2.04
1.02
i.Oa
1.55
0.25
0.45
0.26
I. CO
0.12
CJ?
O.dS
O.'J'i
j.VO
PHEHOLS 1
9.2b
3.24
226
0.03
9.6?
0.0'*
•Id. » I
4.23
0.?3
O.C4
o.-?;-
(I.:JV
O.fi2
O.C5
WHGillfl
37.4
1.33
«/
C..H
164
1.21
0.23
2.92
4.31
S.ll
••.ii.'jl
I'.ii
i . 13
1 B.13
SULFATE 1
2766
531
320
40
' 2'il
150
75
75
54
3G
CT
O-.
Ill'
HD
i Hi)
CHLORIDE
52
93
62
752
2S9
3438
H53
110
405
IID
122
ily
M
HD
COHDUCTIUITY
4500
32flO
5200
22(!0
3200
6200
2500
1400
1900
1310
I3r«,
3
13.
7
= HOT ItULIfO fil 0.01 eo.'L
-------