United States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response
(OS-230)
EPA/540/8-9140/074
November 1991
vvEPA  SUPERFUND
                              Region 5
                              Results
                             Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
ORDERING INFORMATION
The public may order additional copies of this document from:
National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
U.S. Department of Commerce
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
(703) 487-4600 or (800) 336-4700







This document is one in a series that includes the following documents:
NPL Characterization Project: National Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 2 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 8 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Results
NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 0 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: National Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9 Results
CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1 0 Results
PB92-963304
PB92-963305
PB92-963306
PB92-963307
PB92-963308
PB92-963309
PB92-963310
PB92-96331 1
PB92-963312
PB92-96331 3
PB92-963314
PB92-963315
PB92-96331 6
PB92-963317
PB92-96331 8
PB92-96331 9
PB92-963320
PB92-963321
PB92-963322
PB92-963323
PB92-963324
PB92-963325

-------
                               Publication 9345.1-09-5
                                 EPA/540/8-91/074
                                  November 1991
             SUPERFUND
NPL CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT:

         REGION 5 RESULTS
         Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

      The design and management of these studies was carried out by Penelope Hansen and
Caroline Previ of the Site Assessment Branch in the Hazardous Site Evaluation Division, Office
of Emergency and  Remedial Response.  Final publication of the documents was under the
direction of Suzanne Wells and Mary Latka.  EPA also greatly appreciates the efforts of the
numerous  people who collected, collated,  and  analyzed  the data and  helped  finalize  the
documents for publication.  In particular, EPA would like to recognize Nermin Ahmad, Al Canepa,
Catherine Brock, Arthur Johnson, Jennifer Nauen, Amy Newell, Nikki Koch, James Skiridulis, and
Joe Vescio, who were instrumental in helping to design the study, coordinate data collection, and
analyze the information. We are also grateful for the many hours of work put in by our regional
contacts in their efforts to collect the actual data: Marcia Brooks, Diana Coker, Deb Duffy, Joan
Dupont,  Debbie Flood, Angle Garcia, Bill Glasser,  Pressley Hatcher, Joyce  Harney, Sharon
Hayes, Kerry Herndon, Brian Holloway, Paul  LaCourreye, Steve Maybury, Bill Messenger, Carl
Rodzewick, Bill Schaeffer, Dave Schaller, Betsy Shaver, John Toten, Steve Vaughn, and  Murray
Warner.  Finally, we  would  like to recognize Baxter Jones, Nancy O'Connor, and Brian Steglitz,
who helped prepare the documents for publication.

-------
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
 ii

vi

 1
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
Chapter 1: Project Summary
1.1     Project Objectives	1
1.2    General Methodology	3
1.3    Results	3
1.4    Organization of Document  	•	4


Chapter 2: Data Collection Methods                                                5

2.1     Data Collection Procedures  	5
2.2    Source of Data	5
2.3    Quality Assurance/Quality Control	5
2.4    Data Collection Form  	7
2.5    Data Collection Form Instructions	11


Chapter 3: Site Description                                                      21

Chart 1:      Site Setting  	22
Chart 2:      Area of Site	23
Chart 3:      Predominant Land Uses in Site Vicinity  	24
Chart 4:      Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Activities Occurring at Site	25
Chart 5:      Waste Easily Accessible to Public 	26
Chart 6:      Distance to Nearest Population 	27


Chapter 4: Owner/Generator Information                                          28

Chart 7:      Owner/Operator of Site at Time of MRS Score	29
Chart 8:      Owner/Operator of Site at Time of Contamination  	30
Chart 9:      Status of Site at Time of MRS Score	31
Chart 10:     Industry Responsible for Generating Waste:  Major Categories 	32
Chart 11:     Industry Responsible for Generating Waste:  Manufacturing Category
             Details	33
Chart 12:     Waste Depositor 	34
Chart 13:     Waste Generator	35
Chart 14:     Beginning Year of Site Operation	36
Chart 15:     Ending Year of Site Operation	37
Chart 16:     Total Years of Site Operation	38
                                        in

-------
CONTENTS (continued)
Chapter 5:  Regulatory and Response History
39
Chart 17:     How Site Identified	40
Chart 18:     When Site Identified	41
Chart 19:     Regulatory Activities Prior to CERCLA Involvement	42
Chart 20:     Miscellaneous Descriptive Information	43


Chapter 6:  MRS Scoring Information                                               44

Chart 21:     Initial Proposal	45
Chart 22:     MRS Score  	46
Chart 23:     Observed Releases	47
Chart 24:     Pathways Scored	48
Chart 25:     Pathways of Concern  	49
Chart 26:     NPL Status  	50


Chapter 7:  Waste Description                                                     51

Chart 27:     Physical State of Waste	52
Chart 28:     Predominant Waste Types	53
Chart 29:     Waste Quantity  	54


Chapter 8:  Environmental Information                                              55

Chart 30:     Type of Environmental Damage Reported  	56
Chart 31:     Depth to Uppermost Used Aquifer	57
Chart 32:     Surface Water Adjacent to/Draining Site	58
Chart 33:     Presence of Sensitive Environment Within 3 Miles  	59
Chart 34:     Type of Sensitive Environment Within 3 Miles	60


Chapter 9:  Water Use Information                                                 61

Chart 35:     Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply Within 3 Miles: Source  	62
Chart 36:     Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply Within 3 Miles: Population Served .  . 63
Chart 37:     Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply Within 3 Miles: Type	64
Chart 38:     Local Ground Water Uses Other Than Drinking Water 	65
Chart 39:     Operable Wells  Within 1 Mile	66
Chart 40:     Operable Wells  Within 3 Miles	67
Chart 41:     Number of Wells Within 1 Mile	68
Chart 42:     Number of Wells Within 3 Miles	69
                                        IV

-------
CONTENTS (continued)

Chart 43:     Distance to Nearest Well	70
Chart 44:     Local Surface Water Uses Other Than Drinking Water 	71
Chart 45:     Distance to Nearest Downstream Intake	72
Appendices                                                                    73

Appendix A:   Responses from "Other" Category	73

Appendix B:   Sites Reviewed  	77

Appendix C:   Region 5 NPL Map  	82

-------
      LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ATSDR

CERCLA
CERCLIS
DOD
DOE (USDOE)
DOI (USDOI)
DOT (USDOT)
DW
EPA
ERRIS

FR
FS
GW
MRS
NFRAP
NPDES

NPL
PA
PCB
PCP
POTW
QA/QC
RA
RCRA

RD
Rl
ROD
SARA

SBA (USSBA)
SI
SW
Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act
CERCLA Information System
Department of Defense
Department of Energy
Department of the Interior
Department of Transportation
Drinking Water
Environmental Protection Agency
Emergency and Remedial Response
Information System
Federal Register
Feasibility Study
Ground Water
Hazard Ranking System
No Further Remedial Action Planned
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System
National Priorities List
Preliminary Assessment
Polychlorinated Biphenyl
Pentachlorophenol
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Remedial Action
Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act
Remedial Design
Remedial Investigation
Record of Decision
Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act
Small Business Administration
Site Inspection
Surface Water
                        VI

-------
CHAPTER 1:  PROJECT SUMMARY
    Congress passed  the  Comprehensive
Environmental  Response,  Compensation,
and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA)  in  1980  to
address the environmental threats posed by
the  nation's  uncontrolled  waste  sites.
CERCLA directed the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to  identify the sites
that  pose the  greatest relative danger to
human  health or  the environment.   In
response, EPA developed a site assessment
process to evaluate and screen sites within"
the  Superfund  program.     The  main
components of the site assessment process
(see figure on next page) are:

    CERCLIS.   The  CERCLA  Information
    System (CERCLIS) is EPA's data base to
    record and track activities  at all sites
    discovered. EPA learns of sites in many
    ways, including federal  programs, state
    and   local   programs,  and   citizen
    notifications.

    Preliminary Assessment.  EPA or  the
    state conducts a preliminary assessment
    (PA) at every site entered into CERCLIS.
   The PA — a relatively low cost review of
    available information — determines if the
   site  warrants further CERCLA  action.
   After the PA, EPA decides either to send
   the  site  forward  in the  assessment
    process or to classify the site as NFRAP
    (no  further  remedial   action  planned
    under CERCLA).

    Site Inspection. The site inspection  (SI)
    involves more detailed  data collection,
    including  environmental  sampling.
    Based   on  the   SI,   EPA   either
    recommends  scoring the  site with  the
    Hazard  Ranking   System  (MRS)   or
   classifies the site as NFRAP.

    Hazard Ranking  System.   The MRS
    uses information gathered during the PA
   and  SI to screen and identify sites
   consistently for the National  Priorities
    List   (NPL).   The  MRS  results in a
    numerical  score  that  is used  to set
    priorities   for   more   detailed   site
    investigation. In general, sites scoring
    28.50 and above are added to the NPL,
    and sites  scoring below 28.50  are
    classified as NFRAP.

    National  Priorities  List.    The  NPL
    identifies sites that warrant more detailed
    evaluation   and   possible   remedial
    response.  Adding sites to the NPL is a
    rulemaking process—sites are proposed
    for the NPL in the Federal  Register, the
    proposal is subject to public comment,
    and those  sites with MRS scores that
    remain   above   28.50  after   public
    comment become final  NPL sites.

    This report is one in a  series providing
information on  the nature of the sites being
evaluated by the Superfund site assessment
program.   It  is  intended to provide  a
"snapshot" of sites in Region 5 on the NPL
as of February 1991.  Separate reports are
available for the other nine EPA Regions and
for the nation as a whole.  Other reports in
this   series   cover  the   CERCLIS
characterization  project,  which  provides
representative  information on the types of
sites in the CERCLIS inventory.  National
and  Regional   CERCLIS   characterization
reports also are available.
1.1    PROJECT OBJECTIVES

   In 1989, EPA undertook a project  to
characterize sites on the NPL. The project's
main objectives were to:

•  increase   understanding   of  the
   characteristics of NPL sites;

•  develop a centralized repository for NPL
   site information; and

•  summarize  the  types  of  sites  the
   Superfund program is addressing.

-------
SUPERFUND PROCESS
  Site Assessment Phase
          NFRAP (Information Provided to States
            & Other Regulatory Authorities)
      Removal Actions May Occur at Any Stage
      Remedial Phase


Removal Actions May Occur at Any Stage



-------
    Because the characterization is  based
on   information  collected   during  the
screening stages of the Superfund process,
it does  not  represent  a comprehensive
characterization  of  NPL  sites.   The  site
assessment program is a screening program
— hundreds of sites pass through the PA and
SI stages annually. EPA's understanding of
sites  may  change  after more  detailed
investigations  are  conducted  during  the
remedial  stage of the Superfund process.
The figure on the previous page  illustrates
the  position of the site assessment stage in
the context  of the overall Superfund process.
This report provides  a summary  of  the
characteristics  of NPL sites in Region 5 as
they are understood at the time of listing.
1.2    GENERAL METHODOLOGY

   The   NPL   characterization   project
evaluated 1218 sites — the 1189 sites on the
NPL as of February 1991 plus 29 sites that
have been deleted from the NPL because all
appropriate  response actions  have  been
taken.   (Four  sites deleted early  in NPL
history were not included.) The 79 sites that
were proposed for the NPL but subsequently
dropped from further consideration were not
included. The proposed sites were dropped
because of policy  issues or because their
MRS scores fell below 28.50 (the cutoff point
for listing) after public comment.

   The table below indicates the number of
sites  in  each  EPA  Region  that  were
reviewed. Of the 265 sites located in Region
5,  five had  been deleted  as of February
1991.

   EPA published the original MRS  on July
16,  1982 (47  FR  31180).  The  Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act  of
1986 (SARA) required EPA to revise the HRS
to assess more accurately the relative risk
posed by waste sites. The revised HRS was
published on December  14,  1990 (55 FR
51532).   The NPL characterization project
evaluated the complete set of sites that were
listed based on the original HRS (with the
exception of four deleted sites  as noted
above).   Sites  listed on  the  basis of the
revised HRS were not evaluated.

    Data for the NPL characterization project
were collected in two stages.  First, the final
HRS package for each site (filed at the EPA
Headquarters   Superfund  Docket)   was
reviewed.  Then, any data gaps were filled
by reviewing the Regional site files.
1.3    RESULTS

   The results of this report are presented
in chart form in Chapters  3 through  9.
These charts include information about: site
description, owner/generator, regulatory and
response  history,  HRS  scoring,  waste
description, site environment, and water use.
The  box at the  bottom of the next  page
provides information to assist the reader in
interpreting the charts.

   Listed  below are notable findings of the
NPL  characterization project for Region 5.

•  Almost half of NPL sites in Region 5 are
   located in rural  areas;  approximately
   21% are located in urban areas (Chart
   1).

•  Approximately 60%  of  Region 5 NPL
   sites manage(d)  wastes in  industrial
       NUMBER OF SITES REVIEWED FOR NPL CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT
Region
Number of Sites
1
84
2
204
3
160
4 I^J 6
158 | 265 | 71
7
59
8
43
9
105
10
69
Total
1218

-------
landfills;  40%  manage(d)  wastes  in
surface impoundments (Chart 4).

More than half of Region 5 NPL sites are
owned by private industry; less than 4%
are owned by the federal government
(Chart 7).

Over a third of NPL sites in Region 5 are
active facilities (Chart 9).

More than half of NPL sites in Region 5
contain  wastes   generated   by
manufacturing industries (Chart 10).

Nearly 60% of Region 5 NPL sites were
identified  through   state   and  local
programs (Chart 17).

Over 70% of NPL sites in Region 5 have
released  hazardous   substances   to
ground  water;  about  a  third  have
released  hazardous   substances   to
surface water (Chart 23).
    Nearly 30% of Region 5 NPL sites have
    a sensitive  environment  within 3 miles
    (Chart 33).

    Over 95% of Region 5 NPL sites have
    operable wells within 1 mile (Chart 39).
1.4    ORGANIZATION OF DOCUMENT

   This document consists of nine chapters
and three appendices.  Chapter 2 provides
more detailed information on data collection
activities and includes the data collection
form and instructions.  Chapters 3 through 9
present the results in chart form.  Appendix
A lists all of the individual responses for the
"other" response  category, which  are not
displayed separately  on  the charts  in
Chapters 3 through 9.  Appendix B lists the
sites reviewed,  and Appendix C contains a
map that shows the locations of these sites.
                        INFORMATION ABOUT THE CHARTS

   Data were generated from a review of NPL site files in 1989. Except where noted, charts depict
   information for all 265 sites reviewed in Region 5 — 260 that were on the NPL as of February
   1991, and five that had been deleted because all appropriate response actions have been
   taken.

   Efforts were made to characterize site conditions/surroundings as they existed at the time of
   the HRS score. The MRS scoring package and associated references served as the primary
   information source.

   Percentages on some charts do not total exactly 100 percent due to rounding.

   Percentages on some bar charts total to greater than 100 percent because multiple responses
   to certain questions were possible.

-------
CHAPTER 2:  DATA COLLECTION  METHODS
    Before the NPL characterization project,
information on Region 5  NPL sites  was
available in individual  site files at  EPA
Headquarters and the Regional office.  The
project compiled and centralized site-specific
information on the characteristics of these
NPL sites.  This chapter describes the  data
collection activities.  The table on the  next
page  summarizes the process  used to
collect data.
2.1     DATA COLLECTION
       PROCEDURES

    After developing the overall approach to
the  NPL  characterization  project,   EPA
prepared a data collection form (see Section
2.4). The design of the form was based in
part on the form used for the CERCLIS
characterization   project,   an  earlier
companion  project.  A few new questions
were added and some existing questions
were modified to capture information more
pertinent to a study  of  NPL sites.   An
instruction manual  (see Section 2.5) was
developed  to  promote  consistency  and
accuracy in data  collection.    The  data
collection  form  and  instruction  manual
should be consulted for a full explanation of
the definitions  used in the report.   Data
collection procedures were tested on Region
10 sites.  As a result,  a few modifications
were made to the data collection form. The
modified form, as shown in Section 2.4, was
used in Region 5 as well as the other eight
Regions.
Headquarters  Superfund  Docket.    The
second stage involved filling in data gaps at
the Region 5 office.  Information reviewed
included  HRS scoring  package reference
documents such as SI reports,  PA reports,
maps, and records of telephone contacts.
After data for all Regions were collected and
verified,  the  project  team compiled  one
national data base.  The data base was then
analyzed to calculate  response frequencies
for each of the data fields.
2.3   QUALITY ASSURANCE/
      QUALITY CONTROL

    The first level of quality assurance/quality
control (QA/QC), conducted at the Regional
office, involved  comparing  the  information
collected at EPA Headquarters  with  the
information  available  in the  Region and,
where  necessary,  resolving  differences.
After information on the data collection forms
was entered into the data base,  the data
base  was  reviewed  to  ensure  that  the
information  had been properly transferred.
A second level  QA/QC  involved reviewing
the   data   base   for  completeness,
consistency, and accuracy.  In addition,  the
graphics produced for  this and  all  other
reports were checked for consistency with
the data base.
2.2   SOURCE OF DATA

    Most of the questions on  the data
collection form could be answered in the first
stage of the data  collection  process  by
reviewing  HRS  scoring  packages  at the

-------
PROCESS USED TO COLLECT DATA
TASK
Headquarters
Docket Review
Regional Visit: File
Review
Regional Visit: First
Level QA/QC
Data Entry/
Verification
Second Level
QA/QC
Statistical Analysis
DESCRIPTION
Review HRS scoring packages for every NPL site. Complete as much of
data collection form as possible.
Fill in data gaps by reviewing all site assessment materials in Regional NPL
files, particularly references in HRS scoring packages.
Compare information collected at Headquarters Docket to Regional
information.
Enter information on data collection forms into data base. Verify that
information on forms "has been properly transferred to data base.
Review information in the Regional data bases for completeness,
consistency, and accuracy.
Compile Regional data bases into one data base. Perform statistical
analysis of data to calculate response frequencies displayed in charts.

-------
2.4      DATA COLLECTION  FORM
  NPL Statistics Data  Collection  Form
                                                                  Page 1 of 4
General Instructions: An entry must be made for every item on this form. Fill in blanks and/or check the appropriate box(es)
as indicated.
                                               RECORD INFORMATION
 1) Sit* Record Number: (fill in).
                 2) Site Nam*: (fill in).
                                                  SITE DESCRIPTION
 1) Coordinates (fill in or check unknown)
   N. Latitude
                            W. Longitude
 3) Location Land Usa/SKe Use
   (check all applicable local/adjacent uses)
   D Industrial Area
   Q Commercial District
   Q Residential
   D Agricultural
   Q Forest/Reids
   D Military
   O Department of Energy
   D Mining
   D Unknown
   O Other (fill in)	
                                            • —     D Unknown
4) Current Ownership (check one)
  a Private - Industrial
  D Private • Individual
  O Private - Small Business
  O Federal
  D State
  D County
  O Municipal
  O Indian Lands
  O Unknown
  D Other (fill in)	
                                       2) Setting (check one)
                                         D Urban
                                         Q Suburban
                                                                                                    O Rural
                                                                                                    O Unknown
5) Ownership When Contaminated (check one)
  D Private - Industrial
  Q Private - Individual
  O Private • Small Business
  O Federal
  Q State
  Q County
  D Municipal
  Q Indian Lands
  D Unknown
  D Other (fill in)	
 6) Area of Site (fill in and check units
   or check unknown)
   D Acres  D Square feet  D Unknown
7) Sit* Status (check one)
  D Active
  D Inactive
  G Unknown
8) Years ol Operation
  (fill in or check unknown)
  from	(yr) to _
  Q Unknown
                                                                                                              .(y)
9) Industry Responsible for Generating and/or Depositing
  Waste Material (check all that apply)
  D Manufacturing (if checked, must check
    one of sub-items)
    n Food and Kindred Products
    D Agriculture
    D Textile Mill Products
    D Lumber and Wood Products
    D Paper and Allied Products
    D Construction
    D Chemicals and Allied Products
    O Petroleum Refining and Related Industries
    D Rubber and Plastic Products
    O Primary Metals Industries
    D Fabricated Metal Products
    D aectroplating
    D Electronic and Electrical Equipment
    D Electric Power Production and Distribution
    Q Other Manufacturing
  QMining (if checked, must check one of sub-items)
    D Metals
    DCoal
    Q Oil and Gas
    O Non-metallic Minerals
  D Retail Sales
  D Municipal Landfill
  O Military
  D Department of Energy
  QRecyders
  D Unknown
  QOther (fin in)	
                       10) Site Activities/Waste Deposition (check all that apply)
                          D Surface Impoundment (primarily liquid)
                          Q Waste Piles (primarily solid)
                          Q Municipal Landfill
                          D Industrial Landfill
                          Q Industrial Monofill
                          O Industrial Dump (illegal)
                          Q Open Dump • Drums
                          DOpen Dump - Trash, White Goods, etc.
                          Q Illegal Dumping ('out the back door)
                          D Episodic Open  Dump ('midnight dumping")
                          D Tanks - Above  Ground
                          D Tanks - Below Ground
                          D Land Treatment Facility
                          Q Other Sludge Activities
                          O Discharge to Sewer
                          Q Recycling Facility
                          D Underground Injection Well
                             (Class if known _ )
                          Q Airborne Release/Incineration
                          n Drum/Container Storage
                           0 Field Pesticide Applications
                           O Unknown
                           D Other (fill in)
                        11) How Initially Identified (check one)
                           Q Citizen Complaint      D State/Local Program
                           Q RCRA Notification      O Incidental
                           C3 CERCLA Notification    D Unknown
                           Q Other Federal Program
                           D Other (fill in)	
                                                                                                  Continued on Next Page

-------
   NPL Statistics Data  Collection  Form
                                                                                              Page 2 of 4
                                            SITE DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED)
12) Material Deposited By (check one)
  D Present Owner  Q Present and
  D Former Owner     Former Owner
  D Third Party      Q Unknown
  DOther (fill in)	
                               13) Date Discovered
                                  (fill in or check unknown)
                                  	/	/	(mm/dd/yy)
                                  D Unknown
15) Waste Easily Accessible
   (check one)
   D Yes    D No    D Unknown
19) MRS Score (fill in)
16) First Proposed (check one)
   D Original List   D Update 6
   D Update 1
   D Update 2
   D Update 3
                                                  Update 4
                                               D Update 5
                                                 D Update 7
                                                 D Update 8
                                                 D Update 9
                                                 D Update 10
             14) Material Source (check one)
                Donate Generator
                DOffsite Generator
                DOnsite and Offsite Generator
                D Unknown

             17) NPL Status
                D Final  D Proposed  QCIeaned-up

             18) CERCLIS Number (fill in)
                                20) Miscellaneous Descriptive Information (check all that apply)
                                   D Consists of Multiple Units              D Other Emergency Action Has Occurred
                                   Q Units Owned by Multiple Entities         D None
                                   O Emergency Removal Has Occurred      Q Lead
                                                 WASTE DESCRIPTION
 1) Solids • Waste Type: (check all that apply)
   D None

   n Unknown

   D Asbestos
   D Creosote
   D Dioxins, PCP
   D Explosives
   D Fly and Bottom Ash
   D Inorganic Chemicals
   Q Laboratory/Hospital Wastes
   D Metals
   D Mining Wastes
   D Municipal
                                                  O Organic Chemicals
                                                  D Paints/Pigments
                                                  DPCBs
                                                  D Pesticides/Herbicides
                                                  D Radioactive Waste
                                                  D Smelting Wastes
                                                  D Other (fill in)	
                                                     Quantity/Units: (fill in one value for all solid wastes
                                                     and check units or check unknown)
                                                     D Unknown
                                                       	  D Tons       D Cubic Yards
                                                                           D Pounds    D Cubic Feet
  2) Liquids • Wast* Type: (check all that apply)
    O None
    D Unknown

    O Acids/Bases
    Q Inorganic Chemicals
    O Laboratory/Hospital Wastes
    O Metals
    Q Municipal
    O Oily Wastes
    D Organic Chemicals
    D Paints/Pigments
    DPCBs
    D Pesticides/Herbicides
                                                    Q Radioactive
                                                    D Solvents
                                                    D Other (fill in):
                                                      Quantity/Units: (fill in one value for all liquid wastes
                                                      and check units or check unknown)
                                                      D Unknown
                                                        	   D Gallons     D Drums
  3) Sludge* •
    O None
Waste Type: (check ail that apply)
    D Unknown
    D Inorganic Sludge
    D Metal Sludge
    O Municipal
    D Oily Wastes
    D Organic Sludge
    D Paint
    D POTW Sludge
    O Radioactive
    D Other (fill in)	
Quantity/Units: (fill in one value for all sludges and
check units or check unknown)
D Unknown
   	   Q Tons    U Cubic Yards
                        D Pounds  D Cubic Feet
                                                                                                   Continued on Next Page

-------
 NPL Statistics  Data  Collection  Form
                                                                                                     Page 3 of 4
                                 ENVIRONMENTAL/DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
1) Demographics
  a) Distance to Nearest Population (fill in and check units
     or check unknown)
     	  D Feet,  D Miles  or  D Unknown

  b) Population Within One Mile7 (check yes, no or unknown.
     If yes, fill in number if known)
D Yes
                 No    Q Unknown
  c) Population Within Three Miles? (check yes, no or unknown.
     If yes, fill in number if known)
     D Yes   D No    D Unknown
2) Actual Environmental Damage Reported, Potential Population
  Affected (check yes, no, or unknown)
  Q Yes (if yes, check all applicable impacts. For those checked
     having a population affected column, enter potential affected
     population or print unknown)
                                  Potential Population Attected
     Q Surface Water Impacts (3 miles) 	
     n Ground Water Impacts (3 miles) 	
     n Drinking Water Impacts (3 miles) 	
     n Air Impacts (1 mile)            	
     n Human Health Impacts         	
     D Soil Impacts
     D Flora Impacts
     D Fauna Impacts
     D Visual Impacts
     D Other (fill in)	

  QNo
  Q Unknown
 3) Observed Relei
   Is there an observed release? (check all that apply)
   Q Ground Water       D Surface Water     Q Air
                                                 Q Direct Contact      D None
4) Water Supply Information for Three Mil* Radius
  a) Local Drinking Water Supply Source (check one)
     D Surface Water
     Q Ground Water
     Q Surface and Ground Water
     QNone
     O Unknown
     D Other (fill in)	

  b) Total Population Served by Above System
    (fill in or check unknown)
    	  or  D Unknown

  c) Drinking Water Supply System Type for Above System
    (check all that apply)
     Q  Municipal
     n  Private
     n  Unknown
     D Other (fill in)	

  d) Ground Water Data:
    Other Local Ground Water Uses (check all that apply)
    D  Irrigation
    D  Stock Watering
        Industrial Process/Cooling
        Unknown
        None
       Other (fill in)	
D
D
D
D
    Wells Within 1 Mile? (check yes. no or unknown.
    If yes, fill in number if known)
    D Yes     D No   D Unknown

     Wells Within 3 Miles? (check yes, no or unknown.
     If yes, fill in number if known)
                                                         Distance to Nearest Well (fill in and check units
                                                          or check unknown)
                                                          	  DFeet.  D Miles  or  D Unknown
                                                         Depth to Uppermost Used Aquifer (fill in or check unknown)
                                                          	 (Feet)   D Unknown
                                                        e) Surface Water Data:
                                                           Other Local Surface Water Uses (check all that apply)
                                                           O Recreation
                                                           Q Irrigation
                                                           D Stock Watering
                                                           D Industrial Process/Cooling
                                                           D Commercial Fishery
                                                           D Unknown
                                                           O None
                                                           D Other	
       Surface Water Adjacent to/Draining Site (check all that apply)
       O Stream         O Wetland
       Q River          D Bay
       D Lake          D Ocean
       D Pond          Q Unknown
       Q None
       D Other	
                                                            Distance to Nearest Downstream Intake (fill in and check
                                                            units, or check unknown, not applicable, or none)
                                                            	D Feet,  a Miles
                                                            D Unknown
                                                            D Not Applicable
                                                            D None
    D Yes     D No    D Unknown
                                                                                                  Continued on Next Page

-------
  NPL Statistics  Data  Collection Form
                           ENVIRONMENTAL/DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
5) Ecological Information                                                    6)  Pathways of Concern
  Is Site In or Near Sensitive Environment? (check all that apply)                           Q Groundwater
  QYes (if yes, check at least one sub-item and whether in or near that environment)           G Surface Water
     D Estuary           Q Critical Habitat                                       D Air
       Qln  QNear         Qln  fj Near                                      n Direct Contact
     n 100 Year Floodplain  D Barner Island/Coastal High Hazard Area                   n Fire/Explosion
       n'n  QNear         Ql"  QNear
  DNo
  Q Unknown
                                      REGULATORY AND RESPONSE HISTORY
 1) Regulatory Activities Prior to CERCLA Involvement            2) RCRA Status
   (check all that apply)                                       O Underground Storage Tank
   O RCRA                                        •       D Very Small Quantity Generator
   Q NPDES                                              a Small Quantity Generator
   O Other Federal Programs                                  D 90-Day Accumulator
   D State/Local Regulations                                  Q Permitted Facility - Final
   D None                                                D Permitted Facility - Interim
   D Unknown                                             D Unpermitted Facility
   D Other	                            d Unknown
          	                            D Not Applicable
                                                   COMMENTS
(Briefly describe the nature of the facility/problem and any points of interest not adequately covered by this form.)
                                                                       QA/QC (initial & date).
                                                       10

-------
2.5   DATA COLLECTION FORM INSTRUCTIONS1

      The NPL Statistics Data Collection Form has been designed to standardize hazardous
waste site information for input into a data base.  This data base will be used to perform a
statistical characterization of waste sites on the NPL.  All proposed and final NPL sites will be
reviewed for data compilation, including former final sites  deleted from the NPL because the
Agency determined that no further response was necessary. The NPL Statistics Data Collection
Form is designed so that all required  information can be obtained by a review of the MRS
package and supporting materials contained in Regional EPA NPL files.

      It is important that all questions on the form be answered even if the appropriate answer
is "unknown." Estimates based on best professional judgment are allowed, but hard data are
preferred. In some cases, the response "other" can be used along with a brief narrative if the
available choices  do  not adequately describe the  site or situation.  Additional information to
support the use of this category should be included in the "Comments" section at the end of the
form. RESPONDENTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO USE THE "OTHER" CATEGORY AS MUCH AS
NEEDED.

      The Data Collection Form contains six sections which are listed below. The name of the
file reviewer should be written on the front in the top margin.  The form should be completed in
dark pencil so that later QA/QC corrections to the form  will still result in an easily legible
document for data entry purposes.

      Section 1 -  Record Information, which provides basic identification information;

      Section 2 -  Site Description, which describes the ownership, status, and history of the
                 site;

      Section 3 -  Waste  Description, which describes the types and quantities of  wastes
                 present at the site;

      Section 4 -  Environmental/Demographic Information, which provides information on water
                 supply, population, and environmental damage;

      Section 5 -  Regulatory and Response History, which covers any regulatory activity that
                 occurred prior to CERCLA involvement and includes RCRA status;

      Section 6 -  Comments, which provides space for a brief description of the site, including
                 a list  of contaminants and comments  on data availability or associated
                 problems with completing the form. Explanations of "other" responses should
                 also be given here.

Section 1 - Record Information

      1.    Site Number:  This is the number by which the site will be identified in the data
           base.  It is essential that this number be entered correctly on the form.  The Site
           Number is the seven digit, Regional ID number for that site, usually marked on the
   1 This section is a slightly edited version of the actual instruction manual that
accompanied the data collection form.
                                         11

-------
            MRS scoring package cover page.  In the case of some proposed sites, an ID
            number indicating the Update Number is given and should be used. When entering
            the Site Number, it is required that the commonly accepted two letter abbreviation
            for the state's name precede the Regional ID number (or other number) for the site.

            NOTE:      If no identification number is available, use any reasonable means of
                       numbering,  but  remember to precede  the number with  the state
                       abbreviation.

      2.     Site  Name:  This is the name  of the site as identified on the NPL   Copy the
            complete name of the site in the space provided. Also, enter the location of the site
            (town/county and state) directly below the site name.

Section 2 - Site  Description

      1.     Coordinates: Enter the coordinates, latitude and longitude, of the site in degrees,
            minutes, seconds, and tenths of seconds. If tenths of a second are not given, enter
            zero as a default value in the appropriate space.  If no coordinates are available at
            all, leave blank and mark "unknown," while specifying site location (eg., township
            and range) in the collection form's "Comments" section.  Because latitude and
            longitude provide necessary input for interaction with other data bases,  it is
            particularly important that these values or descriptions be included.

      2.     Setting:  Setting is a qualitative measure of population density near the site. Mark
            the  appropriate box to indicate the character of the area surrounding the site.
            "Urban"  indicates central  city  areas, "suburban" indicates  sites  bordering or
            surrounding urban areas, and "rural" indicates sites outside suburban areas. Select
            the one setting that best describes the site. This information may be derived from
            an accompanying map. Generally, the number of homes and/or industrial buildings
            indicated on a map may be used to estimate the site setting.  Since the character
            of the area is relative to population density, a site in the center of a city such as
            Roanoke Rapids, which is  located in rural North Carolina,  would be classified as
            "urban."

      3.     Location Land Use/Site Use: The predominant land uses within approximately 1
            mile of the site location should be determined and all appropriate descriptions
            identified. If the land immediately adjacent  to or on  site is used for activities
            associated with large numbers  of people, or a sensitive  environment which could
            increase the risk posed by the site, describe the appropriate  land/site use in the
            "other" category. Examples of "others" include:

            • railroad                          • school/college
            • airport                           • harbor/marina
            • sports complex                   • federal/state  park
            • wetland

            Mining, military, or DOE should be checked only if they  correspond to actual site
            use  or immediately adjacent site use.  Additionally, if the site or area had a
            predominant historical usage (e.g., railroad yard, landfill, power substation), identify
            this in the "other" category with the words  "past" or "previous."
                                          12

-------
4.    Current Ownership:  Check one appropriate box to indicate the type of ownership
      of the site at the time of the HRS score. For purposes of this data field, operators
      may  be characterized as "owners" if ownership distinctions are not made.   For
      consistency, treat the following situations as detailed below:

      •     If ownership/operation is by multiple individuals, businesses,  or industries,
            indicate "other" and state the condition. However, if all owners  belong to the
            same category, it is not necessary to put this under "other;" simply check the
            appropriate category.

      •     When  the  site  is  a contaminated ground water plume,  as defined by
            contaminated wells, mark "other"  and enter "contaminated ground water
            plume."

5.    Ownership When Contaminated:  Check the appropriate box to indicate the type
      of ownership at the time the site was contaminated.  As in item #4, ownership refers
      to owner and/or operator if a  distinction  is not made.  Procedures for ownership
      when contaminated are similar to current ownership.

6.    Area of Site: Indicate the area of the site, along with the appropriate units.  The
      area  of the site includes the "source" of the waste and the area that  has come to be
      contaminated. If the area of the site is reported as a range, use the midpoint of the
      range.  Again, this data field is intended to capture the area of contamination.  So,
      for example, if there is a large facility but only a small area is actually contaminated,
      only  the area of contamination should be entered.   If  the specific area  of
      contamination is  unknown, use the area of the facility,  if reasonable  (use  best
      professional judgment), and note this in the "Comments" section. For  ground water
      contamination plume sites, area refers to the planar area of the plume. Generally,
      the area of the site will be given in the narrative that accompanies the HRS scoring
      package.

7.    Site Status:  Check the appropriate box to indicate the status of the site at the time
      of the HRS score. Sites  are to be considered "active" if waste treatment, storage,
      or disposal activities are taking place at the time of the HRS score.  These activities
      do not necessarily have  to be those that resulted in the site being considered for
      the NPL. Sites that have changed ownership or operations  are still considered
      "active" if the new operations possibly involve hazardous materials/wastes. "Inactive"
      sites  are those at which treatment, storage, or disposal activities no longer  occur.
      For consistency, address the following conditions as  described below:

      •     Check "active" for those sites that currently have both active and inactive
            treatment, storage, or disposal units.

      •     Consider contaminated ground water plume sites "active."

8.    Years of Operation:  Enter the beginning and  ending years  of waste treatment,
      storage, and/or disposal  at the site.  If the site is "active," enter the HRS date for the
      ending date.  Check "unknown" if the beginning or ending years of operation are not
      known.  For consistency:  if waste activities occurred during only  one year (e.g.,
      one-time  event, accidental spill), the years of operation of the facility should be
                                    13

-------
      entered, and noted in the "Comments" section. If the site is a contaminated ground
      water plume, use a default value of 0001 and 0001 for the beginning and ending
      years.

9.    Industry Responsible for Generating Material: Check all appropriate boxes that
      indicate industries responsible for generating the wastes that occur at the site. This
      refers to the industry  responsible for the  waste,  not the original product.  For
      example, if a hardware store has drums of pesticides which  leak,  the industry
      responsible is "retail" and not "manufacturing." It is important to try to categorize the
      industry into one of the types listed for statistical analysis.  If these listed industry
      types aren't applicable, check "other." Further information may be provided under
      the "Comments" section.

      For consistency among respondents, please note the following  guidelines:

      •    If the site is a military facility, only "military" should be checked.

           Only check the "unknown" category if little or no information is available on
           the responsible industry or industries.

      •    "Food and kindred products" refers to food packaging/processing industries
           (e.g., canneries, bottlers)  and the manufacturing of home goods such as
           toothpaste, shampoo, and cosmetics.

      •    "Chemicals and allied products" also includes paint manufacturing.

      •    Mark "electroplating" for any type of metal coating or metal finishing industry,
           unless the industry  employs another type of coating as the  predominant
           activity (e.g., paint, plastic).

      •    For the majority of cases, the "other" category should be used if a specific
           general or subcategory of another type is not obvious.  Examples of "other"
           categories include:

           —    combination industrial/        —    correctional facility
                 municipal landfill              —    distributor (gas, oil)
           —    industrial landfill              —    salvage yard
           —    waste storage/transfer         —    aircraft-related
                 facility                             service
           —    POTW                       —    radium processing

10.   Site Activities/Waste Deposition:  Check  all appropriate boxes to indicate what
      types of treatment, storage, or disposal operations occur/occurred at the site.  If the
      available categories are not sufficient to characterize the activities occurring at the
      site, check "other" and supply a description. For consistency among respondents,
      please note the following guidelines:

      •    "Surface impoundments" should be restricted to primarily liquid containment.

      •    "Waste piles" may be covered or uncovered.
                                     14

-------
      •     "Industrial dump" refers to an illegal waste pile of industrial trash, chemicals,
           debris, etc.

      •     "Illegal dumping" ("out the back door") indicates situations where wastes are
           intentionally disposed  of in  undesignated disposal areas (e.g.,  dumping
           liquids and sludges onto the ground).

      •     "Episodic open dump" is a site at which third parties illegally dump wastes,
           often times without the  knowledge or approval of the site owner/operator.
           Note that "episodic open dump" may be an appropriate category even for a
           permitted facility if, for example, area residents or industries dispose of wastes
           at the site without authorization.

      •     'Tanks — above ground" should be checked when  the type of tank  is not
           indicated, unless the site is a gasoline retail station.

      •     "Other sludge activity" refers to any sludge disposal action which cannot
           adequately be described by the other categories.

      •     "Discharge to sewer" should be checked when wastes have been intentionally
           discharged to either a sewer or a surface water body.  This category does not
           refer to wastes entering sewers or surface water as a  result of secondary run-
           off.  Permitted discharges should be noted in this category as well as in the
           "Regulatory Activities" section.

           "Airborne release" should be checked when incinerators, boilers, fire or burn
           pits, excessive dust, etc., are  present at the site.

      •     "Drum/container storage" refers to intentional storage in specific areas.

      •     "Spills" are accidental in nature, mostly one time only occurrences. Leaking
           drums do not qualify as spills.

      Once again, try to categorize the activities or check "other" and give a description.
      Examples of legitimate "others" include:

      •     pesticide applications               •     wash pads
      •     septic tanks and leach fields         •     sumps
      •     dust suppression                   •     dry wells

11.    How Identified: Check the appropriate box to indicate how the site was initially
      identified to the EPA Superfund Program.  "Incidental" should be checked if the site
      was identified as a result of fortuitously driving by it, or by investigating another site.
      Anonymous complaints are categorized  as "citizen complaints."  "Other Federal
      program" should be marked for site identification through  programs such as the
      DOD Installation Restoration  Program.   Examples of possible "other" categories
      include Congressional inquiry (e.g.,  Eckhardt list) and ERRIS listing.

12.    Material Deposited By:   Indicate the  entity responsible for the  actual waste
      deposition. For example, "present owner" would be checked if a private individual
                                    15

-------
     authorized the dumping of chemical wastes on his property.  However, "third party"
     would be checked in the same scenario if the property owner had not authorized the
     dumping. Again, for this category, "owner" refers to owner and/or operator.  For
     consistency, check "third party" for all contaminated ground water plume sites.

13.   Date Discovered: Enter two digits for the month, day, and year that the site was
     identified to the EPA Superfund Program.  For example, June 27, 1982, would be
     entered as 06/27/82. In the event that the day or month is unknown, use 01 as the
     default value for each.  If the date  cannot be determined, check "unknown."

14.   Material Source: Indicate whether the waste material was generated on site and/or
     off site,  as appropriate.  Recyclers are considered "on-site generators."   For
     consistency, check "off-site generator" for contaminated ground water plume sites.

15.   Waste Easily Accessible:  Indicate whether or not the waste is easily accessible
     to the general public.  On-site workers should not be considered for this data field.
     Items to be considered in judging accessibility include complete  cover over the
     waste area or a secure fence around the site.  For example, waste material exposed
     at the surface in a park or playground is easily accessible, while waste exposed at
     the  surface of a site surrounded by  a  locked chain-link fence is  not easily
     accessible.  For consistency, the waste should be considered not easily accessible
     for contaminated  ground water plume sites.

16.   First Proposed: Check the appropriate box identifying in which update the site was
     first proposed in the Federal Register (this is usually listed under site name on the
     NPL folder).

17.   NPL Status:  Check the NPL  status  of the site as of proposed Update #9,  July
     1989.  The NPL status of sites to be proposed for Update #10 should  be  marked
     as proposed.

18.   CERCLIS Number: Enter the  12-digit CERCLIS number (usually on the SI  form or
     CERCLIS printout).

19.   MRS Score: Enter the MRS site score (Sm) from the HRS scoring package.  If the
     scoring has been amended, use the most recent score. In the "Comments" section,
     indicate the score for each of the migration pathways.

20.   Miscellaneous  Descriptive  Information:    Identify,  as  appropriate, multiple
     ownership or emergency action conditions.  Examples of "other emergency action"
     include:

      • well closing                     •  fences
      • distribution of  bottled water       •  consent decrees

     Additionally, the presence of lead (Pb) at a site should be noted in the appropriate
     data field.
                                    16

-------
Section 3 - Waste Description

      For data fields #1 -3, wastes have been divided into three major groupings based on the
physical state of the waste: solid, liquid, and sludge.  The physical state of the waste refers to
the waste as deposited and is usually identified as such in the MRS package or in the PA or SI.
For example, slurries are identified as either liquid or sludge, rarely as solid.  The presence of
each of these waste states at the site needs to be determined, along with the quantities involved.
Each  waste state grouping has been further divided into the type of waste deposited.  The
procedure for completing this section, which should be followed for each waste state, is as
follows:

      1-3   Solids, Liquids,  Sludges:   First  determine if the particular waste state being
            evaluated ("solid" will be used -here as  an example) is/was present at the site.  If
            solid wastes are/were not present, check "none."  If solids are/were present, then
            mark the appropriate waste type.  If the subcategories listed are not sufficient to
            characterize the particular waste  stream, check  "other."  As with the previous
            sections, the evaluator should use the  categories presented if possible, or check
            "other" and provide a brief description.   Some examples of "other" waste streams
            include:

            •  spent fuel                       •   biological waste (animal carcasses)
            •  drilling muds (sludge)            •   batteries
            •  dust                            •   construction debris
            •  agricultural waste

            Finally, total the quantities of all waste streams and fill in the amount in the space
            provided.  Remember to mark the appropriate units.

            NOTE:      Identify the specific contaminants found at the site in the upper right
                       hand corner of the "Comments"  section.

Section 4 - Environmental/Demographic Information

      1.     Demographics:

            a.    Distance to Nearest Population: If known, provide the distance from the site
                 boundary to the nearest population. Also, indicate the unit of measure that
                 was  used. Population includes those persons occupying houses, apartment
                 buildings, schools, and businesses.  Use maps, if available, to provide best
                 estimates. If there is an on-site resident population, use 10 feet as a default
                 value.

            b.    Population Within 1 Mile?:  If there  is  a population within 1 mile of the site,
                 check "yes" and enter the number of  people within this radius.  When the
                 number of individual residences is known, the convention is to multiply by 3.8
                 individuals/residence and use the product value as a reasonable population
                 estimate. If a reasonable population estimate cannot be determined, check
                 "yes" and leave the number field  blank. A map may be used to determine
                 population. If no  appropriate information is in the file, check "unknown."
                                          17

-------
      c.     Population Within  3 Miles?:   Follow the same procedures as described
            above.   Again,  a map may be useful.   If data are available regarding
            population within 4 miles of the  site, indicate this and use the information. If
            this information is not in the file, mark "unknown."  By definition, if there is
            population within 1 mile of the site, there is also population within 3 miles of
            the site.

2.     Actual Environmental Damage Reported, Potential Population Affected: Indicate
      whether actual environmental damage has been reported at this site. Note that this
      does not include potential damage, only documented cases of actual impacts. For
      example, if the PA report states that leachate was observed entering an adjacent
      stream or wetland, this can be considered an actual surface water impact, even if
      sampling results are not available.  If  'yes," indicate the type of damage that was
      reported and estimate the  population that could potentially be affected.  If the
      potential population is  not known, write "unknown" in the space provided.  Please
      note that, by definition, if an "HRS-observed release" has been  scored for a given
      pathway, then an environmental impact has been reported for that  pathway.

      NOTE:     The number for potential  population is often provided on the PA or SI
                 form.

3.     Observed Releases:  Indicate whether an observed release  of contaminants has
      been documented. This information is available in the HRS scoring package.

4.     Water Supply Information for a 3-Mile Radius:

      a.     Local  Drinking  Water  Supply Source:  Identify whether  drinking water
            supplies are drawn from surface water and/or ground water within 3 miles of
            the site.  If, for example, the local  area has a reservoir but some houses
            within 3 miles still use wells, then check "surface and ground water."  If  all
            drinking water sources are outside of the 3-mile radius, this should be noted
            as "none."

      b.     Total Population Served: If available, provide the number of people served
            by the  water supply system  indicated in #4a.  Note  that this population
            should reflect the population served by a source within 3 miles of the site; it
            may be more or less than the total population within 3 miles. For example,
            if a well located two miles from  the site is used to serve the population of a
            city of 60,000, the entire population of the city should be included even if the
            city itself  is outside  of the 3-mile radius.   If there is  no  drinking water
            population (all sources are outside 3-mile radius), use a default value of 01.

      c.     Drinking  Water Supply System Type:  Indicate the type of water supply
            system for the sources identified under #4a. "Municipal" should be indicated
            for any central water supply system, even if it is operated by a private water
            company, utility, or individual  (e.g., trailer park  serviced by one privately
            owned well).
                                    18

-------
      d.    Ground Water Data:

           Other Local  Ground  Water  Uses:   Check all  appropriate boxes for
           predominant uses of  ground water  other  than  drinking  water supply.
           Monitoring wells should not be considered. Some examples of "other" uses
           include commercial and dust control.

           Wells Within 1 Mile?:  If there are operable wells within 1 mile of the site,
           check "yes" and indicate the total number of wells used for any  purpose,
           excluding monitoring wells.

           Wells Within 3 Miles?: If there are operable wells within 3 miles of the site,
           check "yes" and indicate the total number of wells used for any  purpose,
           excluding monitoring wells.

           Distance to Nearest Well:  Provide the distance from the site boundary to
           the nearest operable well, excluding monitoring wells.  Indicate what unit of
           measure was used.  If  the well is located on site, use  10 feet as  a default
           value. Note that by HRS definitions, the site boundary can be extended to
           the farthest point of documented  contamination attributable to the site.

           Depth to the Uppermost Used Aquifer: Provide the depth from the ground
           surface to the uppermost aquifer that is or may be used.  If the uppermost
           aquifer is no longer used because of contamination attributable to the site,
           the depth to this aquifer should be entered.  Always  indicate the unit of
           measure used. If a range of depth is given, use the midpoint value for the
           data field. Use a default value of 1 foot if waste was directly deposited below
           the water level of the uppermost used aquifer.

           NOTE:      "Depth to the Uppermost Used Aquifer" is often provided  in the
                       HRS scoring package.

      e.    Surface Water Data:

           Other Local Surface Water Uses:  Mark  all appropriate boxes for uses of
           surface water, other than drinking water supply, within 3 miles.

           Surface Water Adjacent to/Draining Site: Identify all types of surface  water
           adjacent to or draining the site that could potentially be affected by overland
           runoff from the site.   Use professional judgment and HRS definitions as
           necessary.

           Distance to  Nearest Downstream Intake:   Provide the distance to the
           nearest downstream intake in feet or miles, if known.

5.     Ecological Information:

      Is Site In Or Near Sensitive Environment?: Sensitive environments are defined as
      estuaries, 100 year floodplains, critical  habitats  (Federally designated only) and
      some coastal areas.  If the site is in or near one of these environments, indicate the
                                    19

-------
           type of sensitive environment and whether the site is "in" or "near" the environment.
           "Near" is considered to be within a 3-mile radius.

      6.    Pathways of Concern: Check all pathways that received a score greater than zero
           in the MRS scoring package.  When reviewing the MRS scoring package, please
           note the actual score for each pathway in the "Comments" section.

Section 5 - Regulatory and Response History

      1.    Regulatory Activities Prior to Preliminary Assessment:  Indicate any regulatory
           activities that occurred at the site prior to the PA. Examples of these activities could
           include RCRA notification or inspections, NPDES permits and/or exceedences, State
           health department inspections  of landfills and/or DOD  Installation  Restoration
           Program activities ("other Federal program" category).

      2.    RCRA Status:  Indicate the appropriate RCRA  category. If the site is not a RCRA
           site, check "not applicable." Ground water contamination plume sites are to  be
           included in the "not applicable" category.

Section 6 - Comments

      This section is not an optional segment of the data collection form.  It must be completed,
at a minimum, with a brief narrative description of site conditions, including any discussion or
clarification of the information presented elsewhere on the form. In addition, each form must be
quality control checked for completeness, and  initialed by another evaluator in the lower right
corner of page 4. The "Comments" section is a crucial component of the data collection form;
verbosity is encouraged.
                                         20

-------
CHAPTER 3:  SITE DESCRIPTION
•   Chart 1:  Site Setting
•   Chart 2:  Area of Site
•   Chart 3:  Predominant Land Uses in Site Vicinity
•   Chart 4:  Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Activities Occurring at Site
•   Chart 5:  Waste Easily Accessible to Public
•   Chart 6:  Distance to Nearest Population
                                21

-------
                               REGION 5
                             Site Setting
                                                  21.1%
         47.5%
          (3)
              LEGEND:

              P/yS'j  1 Urban

              fcv^l  2 Suburban

                    3 Rural

              Not Shown - Not Specified (0.0%)
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
     Description Section, Question 2, Setting.
                               Chart 1
                                   22

-------
                               REGION 5
                            Area of Site
             LEGEND:

             X/y/\ 1  <1 Acre

             Ifo&j 2  1-4.9 Acres

             W%h 3  5-9.9 Acres
|     | 4  10-19.9 Acres

E>?«:3 5  £ 20 Acres

|s    | 6  Not Specified
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
     Description Section, Question 6,  Area of Site.
                               Chart 2
                                    23

-------
                              REGION 5
                   Predominant Land Uses
                          in Site Vicinity
          100
           80 -
       „   60 -

       §
           40 -
           20 -
                             84.9
53.2
                       45.7
                   37.4
                                          26.8
                                                       12.8
                                                 2.6
                                               k ^ V S.1
                  1234567

                                 Land Uses

        LEGEND:

               1 Industrial Area        !§§§§§§!  5 Forest/Fields

        \^-':\-~-\  2 Commercial District   ESSSl  6 Military

        Wiiil  3 Residential           [#^  7 Mining

        lx*>j  4 Agricultural

        Not Shown - Department of Energy (0.8%), Not Specified (0.0%)
Notes:  (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Site Description Section, Question 3, Location Land Use/Site Use.
      (2)  See Appendix A for a complete listing of "Other" responses.


                              Chart 3
                                   24

-------
                                   REGION 5
                Treatment, Storage,  or Disposal
                    Activities Occurring at Site
            80
       i
       I
            70 -
            60 -
            50 -
40 -
            30
            20 -
            10
                 1234567
    LEGEND:

    § 1 Surface Impoundment

    [] 2 Waste Piles

    ^ 3 Municipal Landfill

    H 4 Industrial Landfill

    Q 5 Open Dump - Drums

    Q 6 Open Dump • Trash,
         White Goods, Etc.
    0 7 Illegal Dumping
                          8  9  10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  18
                          Activities
                                              14 Recycling Facility
 8 Episodic Open Dump

 9 Tanks - Above Ground

10 Tanks - Below Ground

11 Land Treatment Facility  n    g (||

12 Sludge Disposal
                                              15 Airborne Release/
                                                 Incineration
                                              16 Drum/Container Storage
                                              18 Not Specified
                    13 Discharge to Sewer/
                       Surface Water
     Not Shown - Underground Injection Well (0.8%), Reid Pesticide Application (0.0%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
         Description Section, Question 10, Site Activities/Waste Deposition.
      (2) See Appendix A for a complete listing of "Other" responses.
      (3) Tanks were assumed to be above ground unless otherwise specified.


                                  Chart 4
                                       25

-------
                            REGION 5
          Waste Easily Accessible to Public
                                                        67.9%
                                                         (1)
             LEGEND:



             |    |  2 No

             Not Shown - Not Specified (0.0%)
Note:  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
     Description Section, Question 15, Waste Easily Accessible.
                            Chart 5
                                 26

-------
                               REGION 5
              Distance to Nearest  Population
                                   2.3%
                          8.7%     (4)
                           (3)
           LEGEND:

           I   - |  1

                  2 >10 Feet-1/4 Mile
3 >1/4 Mile-1/2 Mile

4  >112 Mile -1 Mile
            Not Shown - >1 Mile (0.8%), Not Specified (0.4%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
        Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 1a, Distance to Nearest Population.
     (2) On-site workers are included in the ^ 10 Feet category.
                                Chart 6
                                    27

-------
CHAPTER 4: OWNER/GENERATOR INFORMATION	



•   Chart 7:  Owner/Operator of Site at Time of MRS Score

•   Chart 8:  Owner/Operator of Site at Time of Contamination

•   Chart 9:  Status of Site at Time of MRS Score

•   Chart 10: Industry Responsible for Generating Waste:  Major
             Categories

•   Chart 11: Industry Responsible for Generating Waste:  Manufacturing
             Category Details

•   Chart 12: Waste Depositor

•   Chart 13: Waste Generator

•   Chart 14: Beginning Year of Site Operation

•   Chart 15: Ending Year of Site Operation

•   Chart 16: Total Years of Site Operation
                               28

-------
                              REGION 5
             Owner/Operator of Site at Time
                          of MRS Score
                                                           53.2%

                                                             (1)
        3.4%
         (4)
            8.3%
             (3)
          LEGEND:
          M^^^WTVM

          [    I  1 Private - Industrial
                2  Private - Individual

                3  Private - Small Business
5 County

6 Municipal

7 Other
          |    |  4 Federal

          Not Shown - State (0.8%), Indian Lands (0.0%), Not Specified (0.8%)
Notes:  (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Site Description Section, Question 4, Current Ownership.
      (2)  Contaminated ground water plume sites are included in the "Other" category.


                              Chart 7
                                  29

-------
                              REGION 5
              Owner/Operator of Site at Time
                       of Contamination
                8.7%

                 (6)
                                                         57.0%

                                                           (1)
            LZi
LEGEND:

      1  Private - Industrial

      2  Private - Individual

      3  Private - Small Business
5 County

6 Municipal

7 Other
            |    |  4 Federal

            Not Shown - State (0.0%), Indian Lands (0.0%), Not Specified (0.0%)
Notes:  (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Site Description Section, Question 5, Ownership When Contaminated.
      (2)  Contaminated ground water plume sites are included in the "Other" category.


                             Chart 8
                                  30

-------
                                   REGION 5
                        Status of Site at Time
                              of MRS Score
          64.9%
           (2)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
         Description Section, Question 7, Site Status.
      (2) Sites were considered "active" if waste treatment, storage, or disposal activities were taking
         place at the time of the MRS score. These activities were not necessarily those that led to NPL
         listing. Contaminated ground water plume and widespread sediment contamination sites were
         considered active.
                                  Chart 9
                                       31

-------
                             REGION 5
   Industry Responsible for Generating Waste;
                      Major Categories
    0>
    o
    I
         60
         50 -
         40 -
30 -
         20 -
         10 J
               53.6
                       31.3
                              12.8
                                    12.8
13.2
                                      3.4
                        2345

                          Industry Responsible
         LEGEND:
              1 Manufacturing        \\l\\\\\ 4 Military
                (Details on Chart 11)    r^^,
                                    Eggg] 5 Recyclers
              2 Municipal Landfill

              3 Industrial Landfill
                                 6 Not Specified
         Not Shown - Mining (0.4%), Retail Sales (0.8%), Department of
                   Energy (0.8%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
        Site Description Section, Question 9, Industry Responsible for Generating Material.
     (2) See Appendix A for a complete listing of "Other" responses.
                            Chart 10
                                 32

-------
                                  REGION 5
      Industry Responsible for Generating Waste:
               Manufacturing Category Details
          30 -
      -   20 -I


      I
      <5
      Q.
          10 -
                            27.5
               8.5
                   4.2
                        3.5
                                             26.8
                                         11.3
                                5.6
3.5
             14.8
                  5.6
                                                           2.8
         123456789

                   Manufacturing Category Details


LEGEND:

^ 1 Lumber and Wood Products      |

IHll 2 Paper and Allied Products        [
                                                       10  11
          3 Construction

          4 Chemicals and Allied Products
      7 Primary Metal Products

      8 Fabricated Metal Products

      9 Electroplating

     10 Electronic and Electrical Equipment
          5 Petroleum Refining and Related   {~J11 Electric Power Production
            Industries
          6 Rubber and Plastic Products
        and Distribution
       Not Shown • Food and Kindred Products (0.7%), Agriculture (0.0%), Textile Mill
                Products (0.0%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
        Description Section, Question 9, Industry Responsible for Generating Material.
     (2) Percentages are based on sites in the Manufacturing category only (53.6% of all Region 5 NPL
        sites).

                                Chart 11
                                     33

-------
                                 REGION 5
                          Waste Depositor
              12.8%
                (2)
         LEGEND:

        X///\ 1 Present Owner/Operator      [**

        |    | 2 Former Owner/Operator      [™



         Not Shown - Not Specified (0.8%), Other (0.0%)
3 Third Party

4 Present Owner/Operator
  and Former Owner/Operator
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
         Description Section, Question 12, Material Deposited By.
      (2) "Present owner/operator" was defined as the owner/operator at the time of the HRS score.
                                 Chart 12
                                     34

-------
                                REGION 5
                         Waste Generator
                                  4.2%
                                   (3)
          50.9%
           (2)
                                                               44.9%
                                                                 d)
               LEGEND:
               Y///\ 1 On-site Generator
               I     I 2 Off-site Generator
                     3 On-site Generator and Off-site Generator
               Not Shown - Not Specified (0.0%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Site Description Section, Question 14, Material Source.
      (2) "Off-site generator" was recorded for all contaminated ground water plume and widespread
         sediment contamination sites.
                                Chart 13
                                     35

-------
                                    REGION 5
               Beginning Year of Site Operation
          30
          20 -

          10 -
            0 J
                                              22.6
                                         17.4
               2.6
                                                  18.1
                     2    3   4    5   6    7   8    9   10  11   12
                                      Years
                 LEGEND:

                FX1! 1 < 1901

                |~~| 2 1901 -1910

                [P$j 3 1911 -1920

                     4 1921 -1930

                     5 1931 - 1940

                     6 1941 -1950
 7 1951 - 1960

 8 1961-1970

 9 1971 - 1980

10 1981-1990

11 Not Specif led

12 Not Applicable
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
         Description Section, Question 8, Years of Operation.
      (2) "Not applicable" refers to contaminated ground water plume sites. For these sites, the source of
         contamination was not documented at the time of the HRS score. The sites themselves do not
         consist of operating or formerly operating facilities; therefore, "Years of Operation" is not
         applicable.
                                   Chart 14
                                        36

-------
                                     REGION 5
        I
        £
                   Ending  Year of Site  Operation
                                                     9   10  11   12  13
                                                       8 1986

                                                       9 1987

                                                      10 1988

                                                      11 1989

                                                      12 Not Specified

                                                      13 Not Applicable
Notes: (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
          Description Section, Question 8, Years of Operation.
      (2)  "Not applicable" refers to all NPL sites that were "active" at the time of the MRS score. "Active"
          sites by definition do not have an ending year of operation; therefore, they have been depicted
          as "not applicable" on this figure. Because all contaminated ground water plume sites were
          characterized as "active," they have also been depicted as "not applicable" on this figure.
                                    Chart 15
                                         37

-------
                                    REGION 5
                   Total Years of Site  Operation
          30
          20 -
       8
       <5
       a.
          10 -
                   24.2
                       23.4
   I
                        1
                           17.7
                                7.5
                                                                       7.9
            1
                                    6.0
13.0
1
2.3 2.3
                                                                  3.0
         1.5
                 0.4
2   3    4   5   6   7    8   9  10   11   12  13   14
                     Years
LEGEND:


n2>i.io
[^ 3 >10-20

F71 4 >20-30

     5 >30-40

     6 >40-50

     7 >50-60
                                                 ili 13 Not Specif led

                                                 |i;i;h4 Not Applicable
                                                 t$$gj  8 >60-70

                                                 Efjgj  9 >70-80

                                                 [23 1° >80-90
Notes: (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
          Description Section, Question 8, Years of Operation.
      (2)  "Not applicable" refers to contaminated ground water plume sites. For these sites, the source of
          contamination was not documented at the time of the MRS score. The sites themselves do not
          consist of operating or formerly operating facilities;  therefore, "Years of Operation" is not
          applicable.
                                   Chart 16
                                        38

-------
CHAPTER 5: REGULATORY AND RESPONSE HISTORY

•   Chart 17: How Site Identified
•   Chart 18: When Site Identified
•   Chart 19: Regulatory Activities Prior to CERCLA Involvement
•   Chart 20: Miscellaneous Descriptive Information
                             39

-------
                             REGION 5
                      How Site Identified
                          2.60/c
                    3.0%  (7)
                     (6)
                                                           4.2%
                                                            (4)
        LEGEND:
        ty^'l 1 Citizen Complaint       B88£i 5 State/Local Program
              2 RCRA Notification       H 6 Incidental
              3 CERCLA Notification     I     I 7 Not Specified
              4 Other Federal Program         8 Other
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
     Site Description Section, Question 11. How Identified.
                              Chart 17
                                   40

-------
                              REGION 5
                       When Site Identified
      1  Prior to 1980

      2 1980

BS&3 3 1981

lilijiii 4 1982

j>>Xl 5 1983

•• 6 1984
                                       [.<<'A   7 1985

                                       W%&   8 1986

                                       f^^j   9 1987

                                       I     I  10 1988

                                              11  Not Specified
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
     Description Section, Question 13, Date Discovered.
                             Chart 18
                                  41

-------
       100
        80 -
        60 -
    Q.  40 -
        20 -
                            REGION 5
              Regulatory Activities Prior to
                   CERCLA Involvement
                                         88.7
                        9.8
               4.9
                                 9.1
                        234
                         Regulatory Activities
        LEGEND:
        B88£i 1 RCRA
        §§§§§§§ 2 NPDES
        [    } 3 Other Federal Programs
        Not Shown - Not Specified (0.4%)
4 State/Local Regulations
5 None
Note:  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
     Regulatory and Response History Section, Question 1, Regulatory Activities Prior to CERCLA
     Involvement.
                            Chart 19
                                42

-------
                              REGION 5
         Miscellaneous Descriptive Information
        40 -
        30 -
     1  20 A
     OL
        10 -
          0 -I
                                          39.6
                                   37.7
             13.2
                     6.8
                                                         7.5
                                                 3.0
               12345
                           Descriptive Information
      LEGEND:

      {§§§§§§§  1 Consists of Multiple Units

      I     I  2 Units Owned by Multiple
      ^^   Entities
      m  3 Emergency Removal Has
              Occurred
      {jjj^l  4 Other Emergency Action
              Has Occurred
   5 Lead Waste Present
•j£j 6 Widespread Sediment
     Contamination
ijj 7 Contaminated Ground
     Water Plume
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
     Site Description Section, Question 20, Miscellaneous Descriptive Information.
                              Chart 20
                                  43

-------
CHAPTER 6: MRS SCORING INFORMATION

•   Chart 21: Initial Proposal
•   Chart 22: MRS Score
•   Chart 23: Observed Releases
•   Chart 24: Pathways Scored
•   Chart 25: Pathways of Concern
•   Chart 26: NPL Status
                             44

-------
                              REGION 5
                          Initial  Proposal
          40 -
          30 -
      0)
      £   20 -|
      o>
      Q.
          10 -
              35.8
    17.0
                       15.8
                                              14.3
                                 5.3
                            1.9
                                     4.2
                                          3.0
                                                   0.4
                                                        1.1  1.1
                                                      i Y7/WA K
 01234567
                 Initial Proposal
LEGEND:
{Z'tv'l 0 Original List      HH 6 Update 6
HH 1 Update 1         R^l 7 Update 7
EXXfl 2 Update2         Effiffi 8 Updates
|     | 3 Updates         ^^ 9 Update9
|^%3 4 Update4         p§j§]lO Update 10
\Z£Z\ 5 Updates
                                                    8   9   10
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
     Description Section. Question 16,  First Proposed.
                               Chart 21
                                   45

-------
                                   REGION 5
                                MRS  Score
           30
            20 -
         o
         S
         s.
            10 i
                             28.3
                       4.2
                 0.4
                                   22.6
                                         15.8
                                               10.9
      9.4
                                                           6.8
                                                                 1.5
                  123456

                                     HRS Score

                   LEGEND:

                   B%% 1 <28.50               ^

                   |    | 2 28.50 - 30.00          ^

                   [S3 3 30-01 ' 35-°°
                   I    | 4 35.01 - 40.00

                   f§§§§3 5 40.01 - 45.00
             8
£%a 6 45.01 - 50.00

555 7 50.01 - 55.00

££] 8 55.01 - 60.00

SH 9 >60.00
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
         Description Section, Question 19, HRS Score.
      (2) N.W. Mauthe Co., Inc. site in Appleton, Wl, was proposed for the NPL as a state top priority
         site. It has a site score of less than 28.50 under the original HRS, but was included in the
         characterization.
                                   Chart 22
                                        46

-------
                              REGION 5
          80

          70 -

          60 -

          50 -
     •+•»       '
     §    40 -

          30 -

          20 -

          10 -

           0
                     Observed Releases



-


"

•
•
-

1 J
72.5































35.1
•*.-. V,Vs
^-\
•?&'"--\
s\ V
V "T'"™"
*>,v "
X1: "• ^ s*

%
	 ( 	 ,



-




15.5
IHI
6.0 ^^H
sNSNS 'D ^^H
CVvoC i*.*.*.*.*i ^^^
                          234
                            Observed Releases
           LEGEND:
           jjijijil  1 Ground Water
           I  V  I  2 Surface Water
                  3 Air
4 Direct Contact
5 None
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
     Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 3, Observed Releases.
                            Chart 23
                                 47

-------
     0>
     B
     o
     Q.
100


 90


 80


 70


 60


 50


 40


 30


 20


 10


   0
                 99.2
                                  REGION 5
                        Pathways Scored
                           74.7
                                              50.2
                                     6.0
                                                        9.8
                             234

                                   Pathways
             LEGEND:

             {•jijjjl  1 Ground Water
             i""1	\
             \   v I  2 Surface Water

                    3 Air
                                      4 Direct Contact

                                      5 Fire/Explosion
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 6, Pathways of Concern.
      (2) A "Pathway Scored" is defined as any pathway that received a score greater than zero under
         the HRS scoring package.


                                 Chart 24
                                     48

-------
       100
    90  -


    80  -

    70  -


    60  -


£   50  H

§
S.   40  -

    30  -

    20  -


    10  -


      0
                                 REGION 5
                     Pathways of Concern
                90.9
                             3.4
                                          4.9
          4.2
                               2            3

                                   Pathway
          LEGEND:

                 1 Ground Water

                 2 Surface Water
3 Air

4 No Pathway £ 50.00
Notes: (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
          Environmental/Demographic Information Section. Question 6, Pathways of Concern.
      (2)  A "Pathway of Concern" is defined as any pathway that received a score of greater than or
          equal to 50.00. Under the original HRS, a score of 50.00 on any pathway gives a site score
          of greater than the 28.50 cutoff for NPL eligibility.
                               Chart 25
                                    49

-------
                              REGION 5
                            NPL Status
               LEGEND:

               I     I 1 Final

               I	I 2 Deleted/All Appropriate Response Actions Taken
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the Site
     Description Section, Question 17, NPL Status.
                              Chart 26
                                   50

-------
CHAPTER 7: WASTE DESCRIPTION
•   Chart 27: Physical State of Waste
•   Chart 28: Predominant Waste Types
•   Chart 29: Waste Quantity
                            51

-------
        100
    §
    I
         80 -
         60 -
         40 -
         20 -
                             REGION 5
                  Physical State of Waste
            LEGEND:


            ••  1 Solid


                   2 Liquid


              Z3  3 Sludge
                                91.3
                             State of Waste
                                               56.2
Note:  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the

     Waste Description Section.
                            Chart 27
                                 52

-------
   I
   0>
   O.
                               REGION 5
                 Predominant Waste Types
         80
         60 -
40 -
          20  -
                   69.1
                  68.7
              27.5
    1
              34.0
                                                        67.5
                                          34.7
                                 21.1
                                     23.8      22.6
                                          14.0

               1    23456789   10
                            Major Categories
          LEGEND:
                1  Inorganic Chemicals    HH  6 PCBs
                2  Metals
                3  Municipal Waste
                4  Organic Chemicals
                5  Paints/Pigments
                                    7  Pesticides/Herbicides
                                    8  Acids/Bases
                                    9  Oily Wastes
                                   10  Solvents
Notes:  (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Waste Description Section.
      (2)  See Appendix A for a complete listing of "Other* responses.
                              Chart 28
                                   53

-------
                                REGION 5
                         Waste Quantity
                                    2.6%
                                           6.4%
                                                  3.4%
                                                   (3)
                                                          6.0%
                                                           (7)
          LEGEND:

                1 1-10 Yd.3

                2 >10-62Yd.3

                3 >62-125Yd.3

          |     | 4 >125-250Yd.:

          •1 5 >250-625Yd.:
6 >625-1250Yd.

7 >1250-2500 Yd.;

8 >2500Yd.3

9 Not Specified
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Waste Description Section.
      (2) All waste quantity data were converted to cubic yards using the following conversion factors:
         1 cubic yard = 11on = 4 drums = 200 gallons.
                              Chart 29
                                    54

-------
CHAPTER 8:  ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION

•   Chart 30: Type of Environmental Damage Reported
•   Chart 31: Depth to Uppermost Used Aquifer
•   Chart 32: Surface Water Adjacent to/Draining Site
•   Chart 33: Presence of Sensitive Environment Within 3 Miles
•   Chart 34: Type of Sensitive Environment Within 3 Miles
                              55

-------
                             REGION 5
     Type of Environmental Damage Reported
    Q>
   £
       100
90 -
80 -
70 -
60 -
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
10 -
  0
                   83.0
             45.3
                                         79.6
                        56.6
                              18.1
                                               16.6

                                                    10.2
               123456
                       Type of Damage Reported
        LEGEND:
        |§§§§^  1 Surface Water Impacts
        I.ZT".]  2 Ground Water Impacts
        EJijij^  3 Drinking Water Impacts
        |'>Xl  4 Air Impacts
        Not Shown - Visual Impacts (0.4%)
                                    5 Human Health Impacts
                                    6 Soil Impacts
                                    7 Flora Impacts
                                    8 Fauna Impacts
Note:  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
     Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 2, Actual Environmental Damage
     Reported, Potential Population Affected.
                             Chart 30
                                 56

-------
                               REGION 5
           Depth to  Uppermost Used Aquifer
                              6.4%
                     1.5%
                        2.6%   (7)
                               ( '
                 3.0%
                  (4)
                     (5)
            LEGEND:

            gjgjggj 1  £1 Foot

            }>»] 2  >1 - 20 Feet

                  3  >20-75Feet

            KX8H 4  >75-100 Feet
^^ 5  >100-150 Feet

|     | 6  >150Feet

      7  Not Specified
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
        Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4d, Depth to Uppermost Used
        Aquifer.
     (2) A default value of 1 foot was used for sites where waste was directly deposited below the
        water level of the uppermost used aquifer.


                              Chart 31
                                  57

-------
                                 REGION 5
        Surface Water Adjacent to/Draining Site
           80
70 -


60 -


50 -


40 -


30 -


20 -


10 -
                         62.6
                 49.8
                                                 43.8
                                 32.5
                                         12.1
                                                         1.5
                          2345

                             Adjacent Surface Water
                LEGEND:

                       1 Stream

                       2 River

                       3 Lake
                               ^^  4 Pond

                               I     |  5 Wetland

                               Eijijijl  6 Bay
                Not Shown - Ocean (0.0%), Not Specified (0.4%), None (0.4%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4e, Surface Water Adjacent
         to/Draining Site.
      (2) See Appendix A for a complete listing of "Other" responses.
      (3) Includes only those surface water bodies that could potentially be affected by overland
         runoff from the site.
                                Chart 32
                                     58

-------
                            REGION 5
         Presence of Sensitive Environment
                       Within 3 Miles
             LEGEND:

             [;:I  1 Yes (Details on Chart 34)

                   2 No


             Not Shown - Not Specified (0.4%)
                                               28.7%
                                                (1)
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
    Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 5, Ecological Information.
                           Chart 33
                               59

-------
     I
     £
                              REGION 5
             Type of Sensitive Environment
                         Within 3 Miles
           90
80 -


70 -


60 -


50


40


30


20


10 -
                       80.3
                                               25.0
                        1                      2

                           Sensitive Environment

       LEGEND:

             1 100 Year Floodplain

       EJ£53 2 Critical Habitat


       Not Shown - Estuary (0.0%), Barrier Island/Coastal High Hazard Area (0.0%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
        Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 5, Ecological Information.
     (2) Percentages are based on sites located within 3 miles of a sensitive environment only
        (28.7% of all Region 5 NPL sites).
                              Chart 34
                                   60

-------
CHAPTER 9:  WATER USE INFORMATION	



•   Chart 35: Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply Within 3 Miles:
             Source

•   Chart 36: Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply Within 3 Miles:
             Population Served

•   Chart 37: Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply Within 3 Miles:  Type

•   Chart 38: Local Ground Water Uses Other Than Drinking Water

•   Chart 39: Operable Wells Within 1 Mile

•   Chart 40: Operable Wells Within 3 Miles

•   Chart 41: Number of Wells Within 1  Mile

•   Chart 42: Number of Wells Within 3 Miles

•   Chart 43: Distance to Nearest Well

•   Chart 44: Local Surface Water Uses Other Than Drinking Water

•   Chart 45: Distance to Nearest Downstream Intake
                               61

-------
                           REGION 5
      Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply
                Within 3 Miles: Source
                            1.1% 1.1%
                             (4)  0)
       LEGEND:

       |    | 1  Surface Water

            2  Ground Water     B

       Not Shown - Not Specified (0.0%)
3 Surface and Ground Water

4 None
Note:  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
     Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4a, Local Drinking Water Supply
     Source.
                         Chart 35
                              62

-------
                             REGION 5
      Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply
          Within 3 Miles:  Population Served
          LEGEND:

          E^3  1  101-1,000

          Wfflfa  2  1,001-3,000
                                               26.3%
                                                (3)
3 3,001 -10,000

4 >10,000
          Not Shown -1 -100 (0.0%), Not Specified (0.4%)
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
       Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4b. Total Population Served.
     (2) Percentages are based on sites that have withdrawals for drinking water within 3 miles only
       (98.9% of all Region 5 NPL sites).
                            Chart 36
                                63

-------
                            REGION 5
      Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply
                  Within 3 Miles:  Type
   a>
   o

   2
       100
90 -


80 -


70 -


60 -


50


40


30


20 -


10 -


  0
                              87.2
                65.3
                                             1.1
                      Drinking Water Supply Type

            LEGEND:

                  1 Municipal

                  2 Private
                           |    |  3 None
            Not Shown - Not Specified (0.4%)
Note: This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
    Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4c, Drinking Water Supply System
    Type.


                            Chart 37
                                64

-------
     I
     £
                             REGION 5
                Local Ground Water Uses
                Other Than Drinking Water
          40
         30 -
20 -
          10 -
                          Ground Water Uses
          LEGEND:
          |§^%j 1 Irrigation
          I    I 2 Stock Watering
          B88^ 3 Industrial Process/Cooling
                                     4 None
                                     5 Not Specified
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
        Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4d, Other Local Ground Water
        Uses.
     (2) See Appendix A for a complete listing of "Other" responses.
                            Chart 38
                                 65

-------
                               REGION 5
               Operable Wells Within 1  Mile
              LEGEND:
              {'virvl 1 Yes
              I    | 2 No
              Not Shown - Not Specified (0.4%)
Notes: (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4d, Wells Within 1 Mile.
     (2)  Includes all operable water wells, except monitoring wells.
                               Chart 39
                                   66

-------
                               REGION 5
              Operable Wells Within 3 Miles
                                   98.5%
                                     d)

             LEGEND:

             t^'.'j 1 Yes

             |     | 2 No

             Not Shown - Not Specified (0.4%)
Notes:  (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4d, Wells Within 3 Miles.
      (2)  Includes all operable water wells, except monitoring wells.
                              Chart 40
                                   67

-------
                              REGION 5
              Number of Wells Within 1  Mile
                                  1.9%
                                       3.0%
                                   0)   (2)  3.4%

                                   ~~
                                                  8.3%
LEGEND:


|     |  1  1-4 Wells


       2  10-19 Wells


       3  20-49 Wells


Not Shown - 5 - 9 Wells (0.8%)
                                       |     |  4 a. 50 Wells

                                       HB  5 None

                                              6 Not Specified
Notes:  (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4d, Wells Within 1 Mile.
      (2)  Includes all operable water wells, except monitoring wells.


                              Chart 41
                                   68

-------
                               REGION 5
             Number of Wells Within 3 Miles
                                    -9% 1.5%
                                    0)  (2)  4.5%

                                             (3)
           LEGEND:

           gjgjg^  1  1-4 Wells


           fcxV]  2  10-19 Wells

           IIIIIHI  3  20-49 Wells


           Not Shown - 5 - 9 Wells (0.8%)
|     |  4  j» 50 Wells


IH  5  None

       6  Not Specified
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
        Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4d, Wells Within 3 Miles.
     (2) Includes all operable water wells, except monitoring wells.


                              Chart 42
                                   69

-------
                                REGION 5
                    Distance to Nearest Well
                              2.6% 2-3%
                               (4)   (5)
                  12.5%

                   (3)
           LEGEND:

           IB  1  < 10 Feet

           I     |  2  >10 Feet-2,000 Feet

                  3  >2,000 Feet -1 Mile


           Not Shown - ^2 Miles (0.4%)
      28.3%
        (1)
4  >1 Mile - 2 Miles

5  Not Specified
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4d, Distance to Nearest Well.
      (2) Includes all operable water wells, except monitoring wells.
      (3) A default value of 10 feet was used for those sites with on-site wells.


                                Chart 43
                                     70

-------
                             REGION 5
                 Local Surface Water Uses
                Other Than Drinking Water
         100
          80  -
          60  -

          40  -
          20  -
               89.1
                12345

                            Surface Water Uses

        LEGEND:

        R\SvJ 1 Recreation               E&&J



        I     I 3 Stock Watering           t'X**!

        |>88^ 4 Industrial Process/Cooling
5 Commercial Fishery

6 Not Specified

7 None
Notes: (1) This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
        Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4e, Other Local Surface Water
        Uses.
     (2) See Appendix A for a complete listing of "Other" responses.
                             Chart 44
                                  71

-------
                              REGION 5
       Distance to Nearest  Downstream Intake
                         9.8%
                          (6)
1.1% 3.4«>/0

 (D  (2)  2'3%
1.9%
                                             (4)
          LEGEND:

          |    |  1  s2,OOOFeet

                 2  >2,000 Feet -1 Mile

                 3  >1 Mile - 2 Miles
            4 >2 Miles - 3 Miles

            5 None Within 3 Miles

            6 Not Specified
Notes:  (1)  This figure depicts information collected on the NPL Statistics Data Collection Form in the
         Environmental/Demographic Information Section, Question 4e, Distance to Nearest
         Downstream Intake.
      (2)  Includes all operable surface water intakes, not just those used for drinking water supply.


                              Chart 45
                                   72

-------
APPENDIX A: RESPONSES FROM "OTHER" CATEGORY
                       73

-------
RESPONSES FROM "OTHER" CATEGORY


Chart
3








4











7



8




Title
Predominant Land Uses in
Site Vicinity







Treatment, Storage, or
Disposal Activities Occurring
at Site









Owner/Operator of Site at
Time of MRS Score


Owner/Operator of Site at
Time of Contamination



Response
Wetlands
Park
Railroad
School
Airport
Hospital
Church
Indian lands
Oil wells
Burn pit/area
Drain/leach field
Dry well
Dust suppression
Sand filters
Sump
Drip/wash pads
Spray aeration
Ash beds
Contaminated fill used
Road construction
Sewage tanks
Contaminated ground water plume
Bankruptcy/receivership
Multiple owners/different categories
Widespread sediment contamination
Contaminated ground water plume
Multiple owners/different categories
Widespread sediment contamination
Number
of
Responses
23
20
12
7
2
2
1
1
1
6
5
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
20
6
5
2
20
3
2
              74

-------
         RESPONSES FROM "OTHER" CATEGORY (continued)
Chart
          Title
            Response
 Number
    of
Responses
  10      Industry Responsible for
         Generating Waste:  Major
         Categories
                          Combination landfill
                          Waste disposal services
                          Incineration facility
                          Laundromat
                          Ore mills
                          Railroad
                          Chemical packaging/distribution
                          Government services
                          Coal gasification
                          POTW
                          Research laboratory
                          School/university
                          Tannery
                          Transformer service
                          Trucking operations
                          Waste transfer facility
                                        17
                                        12
                                        4
                                        4
                                        4
                                        4
                                        3
                                        3
                                        2
                                        1
                                        1
                                        1
                                        1
                                        1
                                        1
                                        1
  17
How Site Identified
Eckhardt study
Consultant to company
US Coast Guard
    10
     1
     1
  28
Predominant Waste Types
Fly and bottom ash
Asbestos
Smelting waste
Dioxin/PCP
Laboratory/hospital waste
Mining waste
Creosote
Radioactive waste
Contaminated soil/sediment
Batteries and associated waste
Demolition waste
Explosives
POTW waste
Baghouse dust
Capacitors and transformers
Construction debris
Air pollution emission
Contaminated woodchips
Cyanide
Fire debris
Fuels and propellants
Waste pickle liquor
    17
    16
    12
    11
    11
    8
    7
    7
    5
    4
    4
    4
    4
    3
    2
    2
    1
    1
    1
    1
    1
    1
                                       75

-------
RESPONSES FROM "OTHER" CATEGORY (continued)
Chart
32
38
44
Title
Surface Water Adjacent
to/Draining Site
Local Ground Water Uses
Other Than Drinking Water
Local Surface Water Uses
Other Than Drinking Water
Response
Drainage ditch
Intermittent stream
Reservoir
Canal
Spring
Commercial
Commercial transportation
Wildlife refuge/habitat
Number
of
Responses
32
16
9
5
3
21
2
1
                   76

-------
APPENDIX B:  SITES REVIEWED
                         77

-------
                                  SITES REVIEWED

     This Appendix lists all sites in Region 5 that were listed as "final" on the NPL as of February
1991, except where noted.
                                        Region 5
                                       (265 Sites)
   Illinois (IL):  37

   A & F Material Reclaiming, Inc.
   Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. (Morristown
    Plant)
   Adams County Quincy Landfills 2&3
   Amoco Chemicals (Joliet Landfill)
   Beloit Corp.
   Belvidere Municipal Landfill
   Byron Salvage Yard
   Central Illinois Public Service Co.
   Cross Brothers Pail Recycling (Pembroke)
   DuPage County Landfill/Blackwell Forest
    Preserve
   Galesburg/Koppers Co.
   H.O.D. Landfill
   llada Energy Co.
   Interstate Pollution Control, Inc.
   Johns-Manville Corp.
   Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Load-
    Assembly-Packing Area)
   Joliet Army Ammunition Plant
    (Manufacturing Area)
   Kerr-McGee (Kress Creek/West Branch of
    DuPage River)
   Kerr-McGee (Reed-Keppler Park)
   Kerr-McGee (Residential Areas)
   Kerr-McGee (Sewage Treatment Plant)
   LaSalle Electric Utilities
   Lenz Oil Service, Inc.
   MIG/Dewane Landfill
   NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelter
   Outboard Marine Corp.
   Pagel's Pit
   Parsons Casket Hardware Co.
   Petersen Sand & Gravel*
   Sangamo Electric Dump/Crab Orchard
    National Wildlife Refuge (USDOI)
   Savanna Army Depot Activity
    Southeast Rockford Ground Water
     Contamination
    Tri-County Landfill Co./Waste Management
     of Illinois, Inc.
    Velsicol Chemical Corp. (Illinois)
    Wauconda Sand & Gravel
    Woodstock Municipal Landfill
    Yeoman Creek Landfill

    Indiana (IN):  35

    American Chemical Service, Inc.
    Bennett Stone Quarry
    Carter Lee Lumber Co.
    Columbus Old Municipal Landfill #1
    Conrail Rail Yard (Elkhart)
    Continental Steel Corp.
    Douglass Road/Uniroyal, Inc., Landfill
    Envirochem Corp.
    Fisher-Calo
    Fort Wayne Reduction Dump
    Galen Myers Dump/Drum Salvage
    Himco, Inc., Dump
    International Minerals & Chemical Corp.
     (Terre Haute East Plant)*
    Lake Sandy Jo (M&M Landfill)
    Lakeland Disposal Service, Inc.
    Lemon Lane Landfill
    Main Street Well Field
    Marion (Bragg) Dump
    MIDCO I
    MIDCO II
    Neal's Dump (Spencer)
    Meal's Landfill  (Bloomington)
    Ninth Avenue Dump
    Northside Sanitary Landfill,  Inc
    Poer Farm*
    Prestolite Battery Division
* Deleted
78

-------
 Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. (Indianapolis
  Plant)
 Seymour Recycling Corp.
 Southside Sanitary Landfill
 Tippecanoe Sanitary Landfill,  Inc
 Tri-State Plating
 Waste, Inc., Landfill
 Wayne Waste Oil
 Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
 Whiteford Sales & Service/NationaLease
 Michigan (Ml): 78

 Adam's Plating
 Albion-Sheridan Township Landfill
 Allied Paper, Inc./Portage
  Creek/Kalamazoo River
 American Anodco, Inc.
 Anderson Development Co.
 Auto Ion Chemicals, Inc.
 Avenue "E" Ground Water Contamination
 Barrels, Inc.
 Bendix Corp./Allied Automotive
 Berlin & Farro
 Bofors Nobel,  Inc.
 Burrows Sanitation
 Butterworth #2 Landfill
 Cannelton Industries, Inc.
 Carter Industrials, Inc.
 Cemetery Dump
 Charlevoix Municipal Well
 Chem Central
 Clare Water Supply
 Cliff/Dow Dump
 Duell & Gardner Landfill
 Electrovoice
 Folkertsma Refuse
 Forest Waste Products
 G&H Landfill
 Grand Traverse Overall  Supply Co.
 Gratiot County Landfill
 H. Brown Co., Inc.
 Hedblum Industries
 Hi-Mill Manufacturing Co.
 Ionia City Landfill
 J & L Landfill
 K&L Avenue Landfill
 Kaydon Corp.
 Kent City Mobile Home Park
    Kentwood Landfill
    Kysor Industrial Corp.
    Liquid Disposal, Inc.
    Mason County Landfill
    McGraw Edison Corp.
    Metal Working Shop
    Metamora Landfill
    Michigan Disposal Service (Cork Street
     Landfill)
    Motor Wheel, Inc.
    Muskegon Chemical Co.
    North Bronson Industrial Area
    Northernaire Plating
    Novaco Industries
    Organic Chemicals, Inc.
    Ossineke Ground Water Contamination
    Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical Co.
    Packaging Corp. of America
    Parsons Chemical Works, Inc.
    Peerless Plating Co.
    Petoskey Municipal Well Field
    Rasmussen's Dump
    Rockwell International Corp. (Allegan Plant)
    Rose Township Dump
    Roto-Finish Co., Inc.
    SCA Independent Landfill
    Shiawassee River
    South Macomb Disposal Authority
     (Landfills #9 and #9a)
    Southwest Ottawa County Landfill
    Sparta Landfill
    Spartan Chemical Co.
    Spiegelberg Landfill
    Springfield Township Dump
    State Disposal Landfill, Inc.
    Sturgis Municipal Wells
    Tar Lake
    Thermo-Chem, Inc.
    Torch Lake
    U.S. Aviex
    Velsicol Chemical Corp. (Michigan)
    Verona Well Field
    Wash King Laundry
    Waste Management of Michigan (Holland
     Lagoons)
    Whitehall Municipal Wells*
Deleted
79

-------
  Minnesota (MN):  43

  Adrian Municipal Well Field
  Agate Lake Scrapyard
  Arrowhead Refinery Co.
  Boise Cascade/Onan Corp./Medtronics,
   Inc.
  Burlington Northern (Brainerd/Baxter Plant)
  Dakhue Sanitary Landfill
  East  Bethel Demolition Landfill
  FMC Corp. (Fridley Plant)
  Freeway Sanitary Landfill
  General Mills/Henkel Corp.
  Joslyn Manufacturing & Supply Co.
  Koch Refining Co./N-Ren Corp.
  Koppers Coke
  Kummer Sanitary Landfill
  Kurt Manufacturing Co.
  LaGrand Sanitary Landfill
  Lehillier/Mankato Site
  Long Prairie Ground Water Contamination
  MacGillis  & Gibbs  Co./Bell Lumber & Pole
   Co.
  Morris Arsenic Dump*
  Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
  New  Brighton/Arden Hills
  NL Industries/Taracorp/Golden Auto
  Nutting Truck & Caster Co.
  Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill
  Oakdale Dump
  Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill
  Perham Arsenic Site
  Pine  Bend Sanitary Landfill
  Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. (St.  Louis Park
   Plant)
  Ritari Post &  Pole
  South Andover Site
  St. Augusta Sanitary Landfill/Engen Dump
  St. Louis River Site
  St. Regis  Paper Co.
  Twin  Cities Air Force Reserve Base (Small
   Arms Range Landfill)
  Union Scrap  Iron & Metal Co.
  University of Minnesota (Rosemount
   Research Center)
  Waite Park Wells
  Washington County Landfill
  Waste Disposal Engineering
  Whittaker Corp.
  Windom Dump
Ohio (OH):  33

Allied Chemical & Ironton Coke
Alsco Anaconda
Arcanum Iron & Metal
Big D Campground
Bowers Landfill
Buckeye Reclamation
Chem-Dyne
Coshocton Landfill
E. H. Schilling Landfill
Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE)
Fields Brook
Fultz Landfill
Industrial Excess Landfill
Laskin/Poplar Oil Co.
Miami County Incinerator
Mound Plant (USDOE)
Nease Chemical
New Lyme Landfill
Old Mill
Ormet Corp.
Powell Road Landfill
Pristine, Inc.
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. (Dover Plant)
Republic Steel Corp. Quarry
Sanitary Landfill Co. (Industrial Waste
 Disposal Co., Inc.)
Skinner Landfill
South Point Plant
Summit National
TRW, Inc. (Minerva Plant)
United Scrap Lead Co., Inc.
Van  Dale Junkyard
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Zanesville Well Field
Wisconsin (Wl): 39

Algoma Municipal Landfill
Better Brite Plating Co. Chrome & Zinc
 Shops
City Disposal Corp. Landfill
Delavan Municipal Well #4
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field
Fadrowski Drum Disposal
Hagen Farm
Hechimovich Sanitary Landfill
Deleted
                                           80

-------
 Hunts Disposal Landfill
 Janesville Ash Beds
 Janesville Old Landfill
 Kohler Co. Landfill
 Lauer I Sanitary Landfill
 Lemberger Landfill, Inc.
 Lemberger Transport & Recycling
 Madison Metropolitan Sewage District
  Lagoons
 Master Disposal Service Landfill
 Mid-State Disposal, Inc. Landfill
 Moss-American (Kerr-McGee Oil Co.)
 Muskego Sanitary Landfill
 N. W. Mauthe Co., Inc.
 National Presto Industries, Inc.
 Northern Engraving Co.
 Oconomowoc Electroplating Co., Inc
    Omega Hills North Landfill
    Onalaska Municipal Landfill
    Sauk County Landfill
    Schmalz Dump
    Scrap Processing Co., Inc.
    Sheboygan Harbor & River
    Spickler Landfill
    Stoughton City Landfill
    Tomah Armory
    Tomah Fairgrounds
    Tomah Municipal Sanitary Landfill
    Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.
     (Brookfield Sanitary Landfill)
    Waste Research & Reclamation Co.
    Wausau Ground Water Contamination
    Wheeler Pit
Deleted
81

-------
APPENDIX C: REGION 5 NPL MAP
                        82

-------
                      REGION 5 NPL SITES
Note:  Because of the proximity of some NPL sites, dots may represent more than one site.
                                 83

-------
U.S. Enw?"^mer»t?.l  Protection Agency

Region  ;-,    v    •-->'.•••      ^   -  '

11 West j^ks. •              ••,.  -..„
"" '      ii   p,- - -         •  •'• •••  • '•-•<*
         IL  OUCv/-i ,    ,

-------