&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste And
Emergency Response
(5102 G)
SUPERFUND:
EPA/540/R-93/028
December 1992
PB93-963229
Progress at
National
Priority
List Sites
NEW JERSEY 1992
UPDATE
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
Publication #9200.5-7306
December 1992
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST SITES:
New Jersey
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Emergency & Remedial Response
Office of Program Management
Washington, DC 20460 P,0tectton Agency
-------
If you wish to purchase copies of any additional State volumes, contact:
National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
U.S. Department of Commerce
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
(703) 486-4650
The complete set of the 49 State reports may be ordered as PB93-963250.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
A Brief Overview of Superfund v
Streamlining Superfund: The Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model ix
How Superfund Works.... x
THE VOLUME
How to Use the State Book xi
A SUMMARY OF THE STATE PROGRAM
.XV
THE NPL REPORT
Progress to Date xix
THE NPL FACT SHEETS i
THE GLOSSARY
Terms used in the NPL Book G-l
-------
INTRODUCTION
A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF SUPERFUND
During the second half of the Twentieth
Century, the environmental conse-
quences of more than 100 years of industrial-
ization in the United States became increas-
ingly clear. Authors such as Rachel Carson
wrote passionately about the often-hidden en-
vironmental effects of our modern society's
widespread use of chemicals and other haz-
ardous materials. Their audience was small at
first, but gradually their message spread.
Growing concern turned to action, as people
learned more about the environment and be-
gan to act on their knowledge
The 197()s saw environmental issues burst
onto the national scene and take hold in the
national consciousness. The first Earth Day
was observed in 1970, the year that the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was
founded. By the end of the 1970s, Love Canal
in New York and the Valley of the Drums in
Superfund Is Established
The industrialization that gave Americans the
world's highest standard of living also created
problems that only a national program could
address. By 1980, the U.S. Congress had
passed numerous environmental laws, imple-
mented by the EPA, but many serious hazard-
ous waste problems were slipping through the
cracks.
Responding to growing concern about public
health and environmental threats from uncon-
trolled releases of hazardous materials, the
U.S. Congress passed the Comprehensive En-
vironmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA). Popularly known as
Superfund, CERCLA had one seemingly
simple job—to uncover and clean up hazard-
ous materials spills and contaminated sites.
Kentucky had entered the popular lexicon as
synonyms for pollution and environmental
degradation.
A Big Job
Few in Congress, the EPA, the environmen-
tal community, or the general public knew in
1980 just how big the nation's hazardous ma-
terials problem is. Almost everyone thought
that Superfund would be a short-lived pro-
gram requiring relatively few resources to
clean up at most a few hundred sites. They
were quite mistaken.
As the EPA set to work finding sites and
gauging their potential to harm people and
the environment, the number of sites grew.
Each discovery seemed to lead to another,
and today almost 36,000 hazardous waste
sites have been investigated as potential haz-
ardous waste sites. They are catalogued in
the EPA's computerized database, CERCLIS
(for the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
-------
INTRODUCTION
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Informa-
tion System).
The damage to public health and the environ-
ment that each site in CERCLIS might cause
is evaluated; many sites have been referred to
State and local governments for cleanup. The
EPA lists the nation's most serious hazardous
waste sites on the National Priorities List, or
NPL. (These Superfund sites are eligible for
federally-funded cleanup, but whenever pos-
sible the EPA makes polluters pay for the
contamination they helped create.) The NPL
now numbers 1,275 sites, with 50 to 100
added each year. By the end of the century,
the NPL may reach as many as 2,100 sites.
Superfund faces some of the most complex
pollution problems ever encountered by an
environmental program. Improperly stored or
disposed chemicals and the soil they contami-
nate are one concern. More difficult to correct
are the wetlands and bays, and the groundwa-
ter, lakes, and rivers often used for drinking
water that are contaminated by chemicals
spreading through the soil or mixing with
storm water runoff. Toxic vapors contaminate
the air at some sites, threatening the health of
people living and working near by.
Superfund aims to control immediate public
health and environmental threats by tackling
the worst problems at the worst sites first.
Wherever possible, Superfund officials use
innovative treatment techniques—many de-
veloped or refined by the EPA—to correct
hazardous materials problems once and for
all. Many of the treatment techniques they use
did not exist when the program was created.
The EPA Administrator had challenged Su-
perfund to complete construction necessary
for cleanup work at 130 NPL sites by the end
of the 1992 federal fiscal year. By September
30, 1992, the end of fiscal year 1992, con-
struction had been completed at a total of 149
NPL sites. Superfund is well on its way of
meeting the Administrator's goal of complet-
ing construction at 200 NPL sites by the end
of fiscal year 1993, and 650 sites by the end
of fiscal year 2000.
Quick Cleanup at
Non-NPL Sites
Long-standing hazardous waste sites are not
Superfund's only concern. The EPA also re-
sponds to hazardous spills and other emergen-
cies, hauling away chemicals for proper treat-
ment or disposal. Superfund teams perform or
supervise responses at rail and motor vehicle
accidents, fires, and other emergencies in-
volving hazardous substances. They also
evacuate people living and working near by,
if necessary, and provide clean drinking water
to people whose own water is contaminated.
Removal crews also post warning signs and
take other precautions to keep people and ani-
mals away from hazardous substances.
Superfund employee prepares equipment for groundwaler
treatment.
VI
-------
INTRODUCTION
Quick Cleanups, or Removals, are not limited
to emergencies. When cleanup crews at con-
taminated sites find hazardous substances that
immediately threaten people or the environ-
ment, they act right away to reduce the threat
or to remove the chemicals outright. As the
EPA implements the Superfund Accelerated
Cleanup Model (SACM), more and more sites
will undergo quick cleanups, and many of
these will be cleaned up completely without
ever being included on the NPL. (See
"Streamlining Superfund: The Superfund Ac-
celerated Cleanup Model.")
Some of Superfund's most significant gains in
public health and environmental protection
have been won by the removal program. As of
March 31, 1992, the Emergency Response
Superfund employee removing drums from a Superfund site.
Program had logged more than 2,300 removal
completions since Superfund was established.
The Public's Role
Superfund is unique among federal programs
in its commitment to citizen participation. Al-
though the EPA is responsible for determin-
ing how dangerous a site is and how best to
clean it up, the Agency relies on citizen input
as it makes these decisions.
Community residents are often invaluable
sources of information about a hazardous
waste site, its current and previous owners,
and the activities that took place there. Such
information can be crucial to experts evaluat-
ing a site and its potential dangers.
Residents also comment on EPA cleanup
plans by stating their concerns and prefer-
ences at public meetings and other forums and
in formal, written comments to Agency pro-
posals. The EPA takes these comments and
concerns seriously, and has modified many
proposals in response to local concerns. For,
ultimately, it is the community and its citizens
that will live with the results of the EPA's de-
cisions and actions; it is only fair that citizens
participate in the process.
A Commitment to
Communication
The Superfund program is very serious about
public outreach and communication. Com-
munity relations coordinators are assigned to
each NPL site to help the public understand
the potential hazards present, as well as the
cleanup alternatives. Local information re-
positories, such as libraries or other public
buildings, have been established near each
NPL site to ensure that the public has an op-
portunity to review all relevant information
and the proposed cleanup plans.
The individual State volumes contain sum-
mary fact sheets on NPL sites in each State
and territory. Together, the fact sheets provide
a concise report on site conditions and the
progress made toward site cleanups as of
March 1992. The EPA revises these volumes
periodically to provide an up-to-date record of
program activities. A glossary of key terms
relating to hazardous waste management and
Superfund site cleanup is provided at the back
of this book.
VII
-------
INTRODUCTION
Superfund is, of course, a public program, and
as such it belongs to everyone of us. This vol-
ume, along with other State volumes, com-
prises the EPA's report on Superfund
progress to the program's owners for the year
1992.
VIM
-------
INTRODUCTION
STREAMLINING SUPERFUND: THE SUPERFUND
ACCELERATED CLEANUP MODEL
Historically, critics and supporters alike
have measured Superfund's progress
by the number of hazardous waste sites de-
leted from the NPL. Although easy enough to
tally, this approach is too narrow. It misses
the major gains Superfund makes by reducing
major risks at the nation's worst hazardous
sites long before all clean-up work is done
and the site deleted. It also ignores the Re-
moval Program's contributions to meeting
Superfund's twin mandates of maximizing
public health and environmental protection.
Renewing Superfund's commitment to rapid
protection from hazardous materials, the EPA
is streamlining the program. The Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model, or SACM, will
take Early Actions, such as removing hazard-
ous wastes or contaminated materials, while
experts study the site. SACM also will com-
bine similar site studies to reduce the time re-
quired to evaluate a site and its threats to
people and the environment. This way, imme-
diate public health and environmental threats
will be addressed while long-term cleanups
are being planned.
Emergencies such as train derailments and
motor vehicle accidents will continue to be
handled expeditiously. Teams of highly
trained technicians will swing into action
right away, coordinating the cleanup and re-
moval of hazardous substances to ensure pub-
lic safety as quickly as possible.
Breaking With Tradition
The traditional Superfund process begins with
a lengthy phase of study and site assessment,
but SACM will save time by combining sepa-
rate, yet similar, activities. Each EPA Region
will form a Decision Team of site managers,
risk assessors, community relations coordina-
tors, lawyers, and other experts to monitor the
studies and quickly determine whether a site
requires Early Action (taking less than five
years), Long-term Action, or both.
While the site studies continue, the Decision
Team will begin the short-term work required
to correct immediate public health or environ-
mental threats from the site. Besides remov-
ing hazardous materials, Early Actions in-
clude taking precautions to keep contaminants
from moving off the site and restricting access
to the site. Early Actions could eliminate most
human risk from these sites, and Superfund
will further focus its public participation and
public information activities on site assess-
ment and Early Action.
Long-Term Solutions
While Early Actions can correct many hazard-
ous waste problems—and provide the bulk of
public health and environmental protection—
some contamination will take longer to cor-
rect. Cleanups of mining sites, wetlands, estu-
aries, and projects involving incineration of
contaminants or restoration of groundwater
can take far longer than the three to five years
envisioned for Early Actions. Under SACM,
these sites will be handled much as they are
now.
Also under SACM, the EPA will continue its
pursuit of potentially responsible parties who
may have caused or contributed to site con-
tamination. Expedited enforcement and
procedures for negotiating potentially respon-
sible party settlements will secure their par-
ticipation. Superfund personnel will continue
to oversee clean-up work performed by poten-
tially responsible parties.
-------
INTRODUCTION
HOW SUPERFUND WORKS
Each Superfund site presents a different
set of complex problems. The same haz-
ardous materials and chemicals often con-
taminate many sites, but the details of each
site are different. Almost always, soil is con-
taminated with one or more chemicals. Their
vapors may taint the air over and around the
site. Contaminants may travel through the soil
and reach underground aquifers which may be
used for drinking water, or they may spread
over the site to contaminate streams, ponds,
and wetlands. The contaminating chemicals
may interact with each other, presenting even
more complicated cleanup problems.
Superfund's cleanup process is arduous and
exacting. It requires the best efforts of hun-
dreds of experts in science and engineering,
public health, administration and manage-
ment, law, and many other fields.
The average NPL site takes from seven to ten
years to work its way through the system,
from discovery to the start of long-term
cleanup. Actual cleanup work can take years, i
decades if contaminated groundwater must
be treated. Of course, imminent threats to
public health or the environment are cor-
rected right away.
The diagram to the right presents a simplified
view of the cleanup process. The major steps
in the Superfund process are:
• Site discovery and investigation to iden-
tify contaminants and determine whether
emergency action is required;
• Emergency site work such as removing
contaminants for proper treatment or dis-
posal, and securing the site to keep people
and animals away, if warranted by condi-
tions at the site;
• Site evaluation to determine how people
living and working nearby, and the envi-
ronment, may be exposed to site contami-
nants;
• Detailed studies to determine whether con-
ditions are serious enough to add the site to
the National Priorities List of sites eligible
for federally funded cleanup under Super-
fund;
1 Selection, design, and implementation of a
cleanup plan, after a thorough review of
the most effective cleanup options, given
site conditions, contaminants present, and
their potential threat to public health or the
environment.
> Follow-up to ensure that the cleanup work
done at the site continues to be effective
over the long term.
The Superfund Process
From the earliest stages, EPA investigators
work hard to identify those responsible for the
contamination. As their responsibility is es-
tablished, the EPA negotiates with these "re-
sponsible parties" to pay for cleaning up the
problem they helped create. This "enforce-
ment first" policy saves Superfund Trust Fund
monies for use in cleanups where the respon-
sible parties cannot be identified, or where
they are unable to fund cleanup work.
-------
THE VOLUME
How to Use the State Book
The site fact sheets presented in this book
are comprehensive summaries that cover
a broad range of information. The fact sheets
describe hazardous waste sites on the NPL and
their locations, as well as the conditions
leading to their listing ("Site Description").
The summaries list the types of contaminants
that have been discovered and related threats
to public and ecological health ("Threats and
Contaminants")- "Cleanup Approach" pres-
ents an overview of the cleanup activities
completed, underway, or planned. The fact
sheets conclude with a brief synopsis of how
much progress has been made in protecting
public health and the environment. The
summaries also pinpoint other actions, such as
legal efforts to involve polluters responsible
for site contamination and community con-
cerns.
The fact sheets are arranged in alphabetical
order by site name. Because site cleanup is a
dynamic and gradual process, all site informa-
tion is accurate as of the date shown on the
bottom of each page. Progress always is being
made at NPL sites, and the EPA periodically
will update the site fact sheets to reflect recent
actions and will publish updated State vol-
umes. The following two pages show a ge-
neric fact sheet and briefly describe the infor-
mation under each section.
How Can You Use
This State Book?
You can use this book to keep informed about
the sites that concern you, particularly ones
close to home. The EPA is committed to
involving the public in the decision making
process associated with hazardous waste
cleanup. The Agency solicits input from area
residents in communities affected by Super-
fund sites. Citizens are likely to be affected
not only by hazardous site conditions, but also
by the remedies that combat them. Site clean-
ups take many forms and can affect communi-
ties in different ways. Local traffic may be
rerouted, residents may be relocated, tempo-
rary water supplies may be necessary.
Definitive information on a site can help
citizens sift through alternatives and make
decisions. To make good choices, you must
know what the threats are and how the EPA
intends to clean up the site. You must under-
stand the cleanup alternatives being proposed
for site cleanup and how residents may be
affected by each one. You also need to have
some idea of how your community intends to
use the site in the future, and you need to know
what the community can realistically expect
once the cleanup is complete.
The EPA wants to develop cleanup methods
that meet community needs, but the Agency
only can take local concerns into account if it
understands what they are. Information must
travel both ways in order for cleanups to be
effective and satisfactory. Please take this
opportunity to learn more, become involved,
and assure that hazardous waste cleanup at
"your" site considers your community's
concerns.
XI
-------
THE VOLUME
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Provides the dates when the
site was Proposed, made Final,
and Deleted from the NPL.
SITE RESPONSIBILITY
Identifies the Federal, Stale,
and/or potentially responsible
parties taking responsibility
for cleanup actions at the site.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROGRESS
Summarizes the actions to
reduce the threats to nearby
residents and the surrounding
environment and the progress
towards cleaning up the site.
SITE NAME
EPA REGION XX
COUNTY NAME
LOCATION
Other Names:
Threats and Contaminants
Response Action Status
Environmental Progress
Site Repository
SITE REPOSITORY
Lists the location of the primary site repository. The site
repository may include community relations plans, public
meeting announcements and minutes, fact sheets, press
releases, and other site-related documents.
XII
-------
THE VOLUME
SITE DESCRIPTION
This section describes the location and history of the site. It includes descrip-
tions of the most recent activities and past actions at the site that have con-
tributed to the contamination. Population estimates, land usages, and nearby
resources give readers background on the local setting surrounding the site.
THREATS AND CONTAMINANTS
The major chemical categories of site contamination are noted, as well as
which environmental resources are affected. Icons representing each of the
affected resources (may include air, groundwater, surface water, soil, and
contamination to environmentally sensitive areas) are included in the margins
of this section. Potential threats to residents and the surrounding environ-
ments arising from the site contamination also are described.
CLEANUP APPROACH
This section contains a brief overview of how the site is being cleaned up.
RESPONSE ACTION STATUS
Specific actions that have been accomplished or will be undertaken to clean
up the site are described here. Cleanup activities at NPL sites are divided
into separate phases, depending on the complexity and required actions at the
site. Two major types of cleanup activities often are described: initial,
immediate, or emergency actions to quickly remove or reduce imminent
threats to the community and surrounding areas; and long-term remedial
phases directed at final cleanup at the site. Each stage of the cleanup strategy
is presented in this section of the summary. Icons representing the stage of
the cleanup process (initial actions, site investigations, EPA selection of the
cleanup remedy, engineering design phase, cleanup activities underway, and
completed cleanup) are located in the margin next to each activity descrip-
tion.
SITE FACTS
Additional information on activities and events at the site are included in this
section. Often details on legal or administrative actions taken by the EPA to
achieve site cleanup or other facts pertaining to community involvement with
the site cleanup process are reported here.
XIII
-------
THE VOLUME
The "icons," or symbols, accompanying the text allow the reader to see at a glance which envi-
ronmental resources are affected and the status of cleanup activities at the site.
Icons in the Threats
and Contaminants
Section
Contaminated Groundwater resources
in the vicinity or underlying the site.
(Groundwater is often used as a drink-
ing water source.)
Contaminated Surface Water and
Sediments on or near the site. (These
include lakes, ponds, streams, and
rivers.)
Contaminated Air in the vicinity of
the site. (Air pollution usually is
periodic and involves contaminated
dust particles or hazardous gas emis-
sions.)
Contaminated Soil and Sludges on or
near the site. (This contamination
category may include bulk or other
surface hazardous wastes found on the
site.)
Threatened or contaminated Environ-
mentally Sensitive Areas in the vicinity
of the site. (Examples include wet-
lands and coastal areas or critical
habitats.)
Icons in the Response
Action Status Section
Initial, Immediate, or Emergency
Actions have been taken or are
underway to eliminate immediate
threats at the site.
Site Studies at the site to determine
the nature and extent of contamination
are planned or underway.
Remedy Selected indicates that site
investigations have been concluded,
and the EPA has selected a final
cleanup remedy for the site or part of
the site.
Remedy Design means that engineers
are preparing specifications and
drawings for the selected cleanup
technologies.
Cleanup Ongoing indicates that the
selected cleanup remedies for the
contaminated site, or part of the site,
currently are underway.
Cleanup Complete shows that all
cleanup goals have been achieved for
the contaminated site or part of the
site.
XIV
-------
A SUMMARY OF THE STATE PROGRAM
xv
-------
Superfund Activities in
New Jersey
The State of New Jersey is located within EPA Region 2,
which also includes New York, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. The
State covers 7,787 square miles. According to the 1990 Census, New
Jersey experienced a 5 percent increase in population between 1980 and
1990, and is ranked ninth in U.S. population with approximately 7,730,000
residents.
The New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act of 1976, most
recently amended in 1990, establishes funding for public cleanups and provides
authority for site cleanup activities. The statute grants the State the authority to
make polluters liable for site cleanup regardless of fault, place liens on property as a
means of payment, recover costs, and collect civil penalties and damages. In practice,
the State attempts to reach a settlement with the polluter prior to issuing a penalty. New Jersey
maintains three funds: the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund, the Hazardous Discharge Site
Cleanup Fund, and the Capital Fund. In addition to the required 10 percent contribution from the
State under the Federal Superfund program, these Funds are available for emergency response,
removals, studies and design, long-term cleanup actions, and operation and maintenance activities.
The Spill Compensation Fund also is available for personal or property claims. At each stage of the
cleanup process for all contaminated sites, the State holds public meetings to inform the community
and encourage public participation. Currently, 108 sites in the State of New Jersey have been listed as
final on the NPL; five sites have been deleted. No new sites have been proposed for listing in 1992.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
implements the Superfund Program in the State of New Jersey
Activities responsible for hazardous
waste contamination in the State of
New Jersey include:
Chemical and Metal
Production Facilities
Federal Facilities
Food Production/
Agriculture/
Pesticide Manufac-
turing
Other
Manufacturing Operations
Landfills/
Storage and
Disposal
Facilities/
Waste
Processing
" -acilities
Facts about the 113 NPL sites
in New Jersey:
Immediate Actions (such as removing
hazardous substances or restricting
site access) were performed at 80
sites.
Thirty-seven sites endanger sensitive
environments.
Ninety sites are located near residen-
tial areas.
XVII
March 1992
-------
NEW JERSEY
Most Sites Have Multiple Contaminants and
Contaminated Media:
Media Contaminated at Sites
Air
Surface
Water
Sediments
Soil
Ground-
water
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percentage of Sites
The Potentially Responsible
Party Pays...
In the State of New Jersey, potentially respon-
sible parties are paying for or conducting
cleanup activities at 54 sites.
Contaminants Found at Sites
Percentage of Sites
VOCs
Heavy Metals
Pesticides/Herbicides
PCBs
Plastics
Creosotes
Cyanide
Carbon Disulfide
Radiation
Other*
Acids
Petrochemicals/Explosives
Dioxin
Gases
89%
73%
24%
21%
14%
13%
9%
9%
7%
6%
5%
5%
4%
3%
"Other contaminants include choloform,
and vinyl acetate.
asbestos
For Further Information on NPL Sites and Hazardous
Waste Programs in the State of New Jersey Please Contact:
« EPA Region 2 Public Affairs
Branch
*f National Response Center
The New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy:
Site Remediation Program, Division
of Publicly Funded Site Remediation
EPA Region 2 Emergency and
Remedial Response Division
EPA Superfund Hotline
For information concerning
community involvement
To report a hazardous
waste emergency
For information about the
State's responsibility in the
Superfund Program
For information about the
Regional Superfund Program
For information about the
Federal Superfund Program
(212) 264-2515
(800) 424-8802
(609) 984-2990
(212) 264-8672
(800) 424-9068
March 1992
XVIII
-------
THE NPL REPORT
PROGRESS TO DATE
The following Progress Report lists all
sites currently on, or deleted from, the
NPL and briefly summarizes the status of ac-
tivities for each site at the time this report was
prepared. The steps in the Superfund cleanup
process are arrayed across the top of the chart,
and each site's progress through these steps is
represented by an arrow (C5>) indicating the
current stage of cleanup.
Large and complex sites often are organized
into several cleanup stages. For example,
separate cleanup efforts may be required to
address the source of the contamination,
hazardous substances in the groundwater, and
surface water pollution, or to clean up differ-
ent areas of a large site. In such cases, the
chart portrays cleanup progress at the site's
most advanced stage, reflecting the status of
site activities rather than administrative ac-
complishments.
O An arrow in the "Initial Response" cate-
gory indicates that an emergency
cleanup, immediate action, or initial ac-
tion has been completed or currently is
underway. Emergency or initial actions
are taken as an interim measure to pro-
vide immediate relief from exposure to
hazardous site conditions or to stabilize
a site to prevent further contamination.
^> A final arrow in the "Site Studies" cat-
egory indicates that an investigation to
determine the nature and extent of the
contamination at the site currently is on-
going or planned.
^> A final arrow in the "Remedy Selection"
category means that the EPA has se-
lected the final cleanup strategy for the
site. At the few sites where the EPA has
determined that initial response actions
have eliminated site contamination, or
that any remaining contamination will
be naturally dispersed without further
cleanup activities, a "No Action" rem-
edy has been selected. In these cases,
the arrows are discontinued at the
"Remedy Selection" step and resume in
the "Construction Complete" category.
^> A final arrow at the "Remedial Design"
stage indicates that engineers currently
are designing the technical specifica-
tions for the selected cleanup remedies
and technologies.
^A final arrow in the "Cleanup Ongoing"
column means that final cleanup actions
have been started at the site and cur-
rently are underway.
O A final arrow in the "Construction Com-
plete" category is used only when all
phases of the site cleanup plan have
been performed, and the EPA has deter-
mined that no additional construction
actions are required at the site. Some
sites in this category currently may be
undergoing long-term operation and
maintenance or monitoring to ensure
that the cleanup actions continue to pro-
tect human health and the environment.
/ A check in the "Deleted" category indi-
cates that the site cleanup has met all
human health and environmental goals
and that the EPA has deleted the site
from the NPL.
Further information on the activities and
progress at each site is given in the site "Fact
Sheets" published in this volume.
XIX
-------
•o
0)
^
m
Q)
k.
/i\
w
^
0
Z
"5
0)
S
S
•*-•
c
0)
0)
_J
Q.
Z
OB
Q.
3
C
CO
__
O
TJ
Progress Towa
p Construction
g Complete Dele!
2 C
£ o
2 %
o o
>* CL
•g D>
C '«
m 01
(SO
>>TJ
^J Q)
0) t)
1-
« 0)
DC (/)
0)
0) .».
•*- TQ
(0 3
55
0)
i g.
~ S
DC
to
Q
Q.
Z
f
O
o
01
CO
Z
0)
ft
ft
ft ft
ft ft
ft
m co
go s°
oo oo
1 1
s 1
PH PH
SUSSEX
SOMERSET
r^
y
52
o
u
A.O. POLYMER
AMERICAN CYANAMID
S
ft
ft ft
ft ft ft
ft ft ft
ft ft ft
ft ft ft
P,-, l.f-l ^
§ § ol
8 S S
*T~1
73 1 73
c "^3 c
PH Q PH
MORRIS
OCEAN
MONMOUTH
C/3
l
H-l
>
ASBESTOS DUMP
BEACHWOOD/BERKELE
BOG CREEK FARM
ft
ft
ft
ft ft
ft ft
co co
go go
oo oo
1 1
c9 ra
PH PH
OCEAN
GLOUCESTER
w
u
^
£>
w
c/}
H j
d 5
PL, <->
BRICK TOWNSHIP LANI
BRIDGEPORT RENTAL &
ft
ft
ft
ft ft
ft ft
ON co
go go
O C£N
vH (j^
1 1
PH PH
SOMERSET
MONMOUTH/
a
BROOK INDUSTRIAL PA
BURNT FLY BOG
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ro
SO
oS
1
73
PH
MIDDLESEX
ESSEX
CALDWELL TRUCKING
ft ft
ft ft
ft ft
ft ft
ft ft
co o
§ §
II
£v Cv
u, PH
UNION
MIDDLESEX
O
H
oS
8
u o
ft
ft ft ft
ft ft ft
ft ft ft
ft ft ft
^. ^ ^
2° 9£ go
-H OO OO
TO Cg w
G G G
PH PH PH
GLOUCESTER
MIDDLESEX
OCEAN
CJ
^
^
LlJ
Z
p
i
CHEMICAL LEAMAN T^
CHEMSOL, INC.
CIBA-GEIGYCORP.
ft
ft
VO
§•
S
73
PH
BURLINGTON
^.^
F-M T-—< f*-H I—J
TO TO O C3 C3 C\J TO
c e ^ c c c c
PH PH Q PH PH PH P-
§ X
H PQ u
oo ^ § g pq Z, P
S 2 u fo § CQ •<
.-
K
O
U
_1 _] ^
GW CONTAMINATIO]
COMBE FILL NORTH LA
COMBE FILL SOUTH LA
COOPER ROAD SITE
COSDEN CHEMICAL CO
CPS/MADISON INDUSTF
CURCIO SCRAP METAL,
DTMPERIO PROPERTY
ft
ft ft ft
ft ft
f-- Tt CO
oT — §•
III
111
E E E
MORRIS
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
z
-------
TJ
Q>
0)
o
.2 a)
t> o>
51
= 1
O O
o
Q. O)
3 C
c '5
00
0)
C -b o>
1 II °
O DC m
O
s
0
0 00 00
0
00000 0000 00 0 0
00000 0000000 0 0
0
0
|f 0000000000000000000000000000
0)
~ ^ (0
g I I 0 000000 0
Q> = w
00 0
0 0
00000
2
CO
0)
*-
_c
CO
CO
_l
Q.
z
15
Q.
_
o
(0
I
(0
(0
s
O)
o
o>
Q
OO
O O
13 "3 13
.S .5 .S
E
MH
c
0)
m
XXI
March 1992
-------
•a
a>
a>
O
S
s
la,
0
00
o
0.0,
£ o
S g>
oo
oo
o
a
o o
T3
Q)
•g 3" 3
C
O
o
52 CO
0)
0)
o
0)
3
4—>
CO
0)
(A)
Q)
S
Q.
z
*-»
CO
Q.
=>
C
(Q
_0>
O
T3
(5
I
tf)
(0
2
O)
S
Q.
a,
w
« 5
*= o
c 8-
~ a,
cc
0)
*••
CO
ra
z
oo ooo o oo o
oo
E 8 0 0 00 000 0 00 0 000
000
0000
11 oooooooooooooo o oooo oooooo
000 00
0 0
0000
.
S
•^ m ro o co
go go go g\ go
^H OO OO O OO
Q. R ~
go
go go go
OO OO OO ^^> (JKJ -^r
sis§§s8siiss
QJ QJ
^J C7^TOCvTOTO^3^wTOTOTOTO
Q- S "«3 .S .S S S -S "« S .S -S S S
Z PL,QPHPHPL,PHPHQPHUHPHP-
go 50 gv go go go
oo oo ^^ oo oo *-*
^ ^ SN ^ ^ rn
s s s s s s
TO TO TO TO TO TO
g c g g c c
PH E PH PH E E
8 3 3 [a 'p
NAS
|g
>£§£
S§2«
^ H^ CU *
s: § s:
PO
March 1992
XXII
-------
TJ
0)
.2 a)
^ •**
O 0)
H "5.
«s c
S o
§0
O
a. o
3 c
S o
So,
00
ft
0
ft ft
ft ft ft ft
ft
Continued)
>B*^
>»
52
0)
-3
i
**—
o
Q)
(0
CO
Or
-^*
C
£
CO
_J
Q.
Z
to
Q.
•^
Progress Toward Cleani
•o* o>
1 t>
0)
23
CO 3
5)
$
IS
"Eg-
0)
oc
5
a
_i
a.
z
f
<§
a
CO
2
CO
ft
ft
ft
*o
9£
O
^H
i
OH
ATLANTIC
00
d
frl
| POMONA OAKS RESIDENTIAL WE
ft
ft
ft
ft
ff-^
§1
o
8
13
3
OH
ATLANTIC
| PRICE LANDFILL
ft
^t"
J>D
Q.
8
13
^
MORRIS
| RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
ft
ft
ft
ft
CO
8|
^
8
13
c.
OH
1
| REICH FARMS
ftftft ftftftftft ftftftftftft
ftftft ftftftftft ftftftftftft
ftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftft
ftftftft ftftft ft ftftftftft
co co co co ro co co co co Tt~ co ^-CD
wy^^^zwzoowwF.az^
^3iSll^S|^§5|§ll3
iillisiglsi^ellsS
SixSSooCQScaSOS^OUScQW
P O
rrl CT
E ^
^JrJj W dd 8
^e|S o gu ^ fe
,>HjK^u39^"^^sSs
1 § $ I i i n *i 1 § | ** 1 1
iigssagSliiiSisp
X. *-7' \*s \J \*/ M-l b^ C3 ^ P3 —J t_J rrl S*^ /^i CD •
H&OOOO^uffiSOOK^^-^^
wawWOiOHVioricoc^joocnooooaiHh^
XXIII
ft
ft
co
Q
8
13
c
OH
BERGEN
3
U
UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS (CHE
1 DIVISION)
ft
ft
ft
xr
gfc
i— 1
ci
8
73
CH
OH
P
^
W
J
_J
E
1
UPPER DEERFffiLD TOWNSHP LA
ft
ft
^j-
QO
1— H
d
8
13
c
OH
BERGEN
VENTRON/VELSICOL
ft
ft
ft
ft
t^t-
cxb
ci
8
13
c
OH
§
%
CUMBERLy
VINELAND CHEMICAL CO., INC.
March
ft
ft ft
ft ft
CO Tf
go g£>
oo — i
8^ 8
13 13
c c
OH OH
i
5
CUMBERL^
PASSAIC
j VINELAND STATE SCHOOL
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
1992
-------
-a
CD
TJ
0)
3
C
V-
0
g.
^^^
0)
1_
•^
0)
Z
H—
O
Qj
OB
CO
%
0)
O)
IX
fli
lo
!s
V-
'JE
0)
0
V
«
E
O
D)
C
'o
^
O
O)
'en
Q>
v
3
0)
01
CO
in
0)
TJ
55
c
o
CO
(1)
DC
CD
CO
Q
Q.
Z
"c
o
O
0)
CO
0)
CO
ft
ft
ft
ft
GO
&
S
13
tL,
ffi
MONMOU1
•
g
"__
C/3
w
u
w
Q
ALDICK AEROSPACE
^
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
S
V")
£i
8
1
PH
ESSEX
Z
O
p
1
fflTE CHEMICAL COR
^
ft
ft
^
ft
ft
rn
oo
oo
R
S
13
UH
U
ILLIAMS PROPERTY
^
ft
ft
a|
^H
ci
S
e
UH
OCEAN
ILSON FARM
^
ft
ft
ft
ft
oo
^«
^
o
13
OH
BERGEN
OH'
ITCO CHEMICAL COR
^
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
a|
^_t
SN.
ON
O
1
OH
2;
0
BURLINGT'
§
OODLAND ROUTE 72:
^
March 1992
f±
/\^
/ ^
/ ^L
ft / •«- X
ft / "^ \
/ x
/ — .
ft
ft
ft
oS
,_,
c^
S
13
OH
z
Q
O
&
CQ
%
D
Q
OODLAND ROUTE 532
c
O aj
^ s a 1 -a
K ^ 1 1
§U
O.M
« * 3-S
T ,t5 *r; :S ec
C/3 P S H
UO
•5' H
^J -C Q; 6JD
M faQ
i»,T3
1/1 A "° S
oo j| -| 1|
^ (KM
w"
^ ^ g» ^
^ """ '5- 3 **
y^ c
_j
•^
-S
-c;
S
0
2
|
,S
"f
K
»—
fe
-g
^
•c:
'§
2i
'Z
~&
I
§
a
s1
c;
a
O
o
^
xx iv
-------
A.O. POLYMER
N E W J E RS EY ^r-wCg 1 mile northeast of Sparta
EPA ID# NJD030253355
Site Description
The 4-acre A.O. Polymer site, active since the early 1960s, produces resins, plastics, paper
coatings, and specialty polymers. In the late 1970s, the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy confirmed the contamination of soil, groundwater, and
surface water in the area of the chemical plant, which allegedly resulted from plant operation
and waste disposal practices. Operators left hundreds of leaking and deteriorated drums on
the site, as well as an uncontrolled disposal lagoon which contained waste from plant
operations. The site has been the focus of concern for local residents and regulatory
authorities since the early 1970s. Citizens noticed odors in well water and the air in 1973;
reports intensified over the next few years. In 1978, the Sparta Health Department and the
State found volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in three domestic water wells. The State
cited the facility twice for improperly discharging plant wastewater and thirteen times for air
quality violations. The site is located near the Wallkill River, 1/4 mile from the commercial
area of Sparta. A plume of contaminated groundwater has migrated to, and discharges into,
both the Wallkill River and associated wetlands. Approximately 750 people live in the area of
the site. The site threatens the Allentown aquifer, a source of potable groundwater that
supplies drinking water to over 700 people.
o-* B -u-r* TT.- • • u • AA A *u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties actions.
March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Soil beneath the disposal lagoon area is contaminated with VOCs including
ketones and phenols. Groundwater is contaminated with various VOCs which
migrated from the contaminated soil. Wetlands and surface water have been
contaminated by the spread of contaminated groundwaters. However, the low
levels of VOC contamination in these two media are of little concern and
demonstrate no risk to the surrounding population or environment. Possible
health threats include drinking contaminated groundwater.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1980 and 1981, the State undertook an extensive
cleanup, removing 950 drums of hazardous wastes, 1,700 cubic yards of
contaminated soils, and 120 cubic yards of crushed drums and debris. All liquids,
solids, and buried materials were removed. In 1982, the State Division of Water Resources
installed 11 monitoring wells. In 1984, the investigation was turned over to the State's
Hazardous Site Mitigation division and, in 1986, an intensive site study began.
Entire Site: A State-led investigation that explored the nature and extent of soil
and groundwater contamination was completed in the spring of 1991. The EPA
has selected the final cleanup remedy which includes soil vapor extraction to
address removal of contaminants in soils, and construction of a pumping and Powdered
Activated Carbon Treatment system to treat contaminated groundwater. Design of the
remedy is expected to begin in 1992.
Environmental Progress
The removal of wastes, contaminated soils, drums, and debris has reduced the potential for
exposure to hazardous substances at the A.O. Polymer site while final cleanup activities are
being planned.
Site Repository
Sparta Public Library, 22 Woodport Road, Sparta, NJ 07871
March 1992 2 A.O. POLYMER
-------
AMERICAN CYANAMfcK EPARBMOMa
COMPANY V/lriy Bound Brook
NEW JERSEY 7 o /- \ v/ / Bound BrookPiant
Other Names:
/ *5rw / B.
EPAID# NJD002173276
Site Description
The 575-acre American Cyanamid Company site was acquired in the early 1930s and has
produced a variety of pharmaceutical chemicals, dyes, rubber chemicals, elastics, textile
chemicals, and pigments. Currently, the major production is pharmaceutical chemicals. The
site is located adjacent to the Raritan River and lies above the Brunswick Aquifer, New
Jersey's second largest source of drinking water. On the site are 27 lagoons and
impoundments, both active and inactive, which have been used for the disposal of various
chemical sludges and other wastes, as well as for the treatment of wastewaters generated at
the site. Investigations conducted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) and American Cyanamid Company have documented
groundwater and soil contamination. The site is fenced and restricted. Approximately 14,000
people live within a 3-mile radius of the site. The closest home is 2,000 feet away, and 30
private wells lie close to the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater underlying the area is contaminated with various volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from site production activities. Sludges and soils sampled in
on-site impoundments contain heavy metals, cyanide, and VOCs. On-site workers
or trespassers may be exposed to contaminants through direct contact with
contaminated soils, sludges, or groundwater. The contaminated groundwater is not
a source of drinking water.
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four long-term remedial phases focusing on interim
groundwater monitoring and treatment, cleanup of the lagoons, cleanup of the soils, and
cleanup of the groundwater.
Response Action Status
Interim Groundwater Monitoring and Treatment: American Cyanamid
Company installed monitoring wells to check on groundwater movement and to
monitor contaminant levels. The company submits a quarterly report to the State
on the quality of water pumped from the supply and monitoring wells. Analysis includes a
priority pollutant scan. The ongoing groundwater pumping control system, which pumps
approximately 600,000 gallons per day, has been effective in preventing contaminated seepage
from moving off site through the groundwater. This groundwater control system is expected
to continue operating through 1994, at which time alternative cleanup actions will be
identified and selected if necessary.
Lagoons: Under State monitoring, American Cyanamid Company has conducted
an intensive study of the lagoons and sludges. The company is currently evaluating
various technologies for cleanup of the first group of impoundments. The
technologies being considered include incineration, other thermal treatments, bioremediation
using microorganisms, solidification, and in-place containment. The lagoons have been broken
into four groups according to waste type and location on site. Each group will be addressed
separately. The EPA, along with the State of New Jersey, is scheduled to select a remedy for
the first group of impoundments in 1993.
Soils: Under State monitoring, American Cyanamid Company began a study of
contaminated soils in 1990. Once this study is completed, the EPA will evaluate
the findings and select a final cleanup remedy for contaminated soils on the site.
Groundwater: An investigation determining the extent of groundwater
contamination is expected to begin once the sources of the contamination, the
lagoons, and soils have been addressed. A final cleanup remedy will be selected
once the investigation is completed.
Site Facts: In 1981, American Cyanamid Company and the NJDEPE signed an
Administrative Order on Consent requiring the company to assess the contamination of the
underlying groundwater from the on-site impoundments and to design and enforce a site
cleanup plan. In 1988, the NJDEPE signed a second Administrative Order on Consent with
American Cyanamid Company covering cleanup activities at the entire facility.
March 1992 4 AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
-------
Environmental Progress
The groundwater monitoring and pumping activities described above have reduced migration
of contaminants from the site and are protecting groundwater supplies from further
contamination. Ongoing investigations at the American Cyanamid Company site will develop
final cleanup strategies for addressing the lagoon, soil, and groundwater contamination.
Site Repository
Somerset County Library, Main Library, North Bridge Street and Vogt Drive, Bridgewater,
NJ 08807
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
March 1992
-------
ASBESTOS DUMP EPAJ2*£N 2
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980654149
Site Description
The Asbestos Dump site consists of the 11-acre Millington area and three separate satellite
properties, totaling approximately 59 acres. Beginning in 1927, a succession of owners
operated an asbestos products manufacturing plant at the Millington area. It contains the
largest volume of asbestos wastes; more than 90 percent of this area contains such wastes.
Erosion and weathering have exposed areas of asbestos along the Passaic River bank. One
satellite site, known as the Dietzman Tract or Great Swamp area, is located in the Great
Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, about 2 miles southeast of New Vernon Road. This site
was used as a refuse and asbestos disposal area for approximately 40 years and is bordered by
Great Brook and a woodland habitat. The New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road
portions of the site are residential properties about a mile south of the Great Swamp area.
The New Vernon Road consists of approximately 30 acres. Broken asbestos tiles and siding,
as well as loose asbestos fibers, were landfilled in this former corn and dairy farm during the
late 1960s. The White Bridge Road area, covering 12 acres, is bounded by the Great Swamp
National Wildlife Refuge and private residences. This property was a farm until 1969, when
the current owner started landfilling asbestos waste from the Millington facility. The wastes
are present on the site as subsurface fill or as part of an asbestos waste mound. Disposal
continued from 1970 to 1975. Afterward, the owner graded and seeded the dumping areas
and converted the property into a horse farm. Approximately 650 people live within a mile of
the Millington site. The site itself currently employs approximately 200 people.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL L1STING HISTORY
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and soils contain heavy metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
phthalates, phenols, and asbestos. Sediments contain low levels of VOCs,
phthalates, and heavy metals including lead and mercury. Surface water contains
phthalates and heavy metals including cadmium, chromium, and silver. While
different levels and types of contaminants have been detected at the different
subsites, asbestos has been detected at all four subsites. There is a potential health
risk to the owners, nearby residents, and tourists due to the airborne release of
asbestos fibers.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: immediate actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the Millington area, New Vernon and White Bridge Roads,
and the Dietzman Tract.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1983, the parties potentially responsible for the site
contamination restabilized the Passaic River bank, correcting erosion that took
place during heavy spring rains. In 1990, actions were conducted to immobilize
asbestos contamination at the New Vernon Road and White Bridge Road subsites. These
actions included erecting signs and fences, sampling air and soil, capping two driveways,
covering visible asbestos containing materials with geotextile fabric, removing a dilapidated
shed, and removing asbestos containing material from the ground surface.
Millington Cleanup: The remedies selected by the EPA in 1988 for cleanup of
the Millington area include: installing a soil cover on areas of exposed asbestos;
building a chain-link security fence around all areas of known or suspected
asbestos disposal; protecting and stabilizing the slope along the base of the asbestos mound
embankment; building channels to divert surface runoff; conducting operations, maintenance,
and long-term monitoring; restricting development of the asbestos fill areas and use of
groundwater on site; and performing technical studies that will address the permanent
destruction or immobilization of asbestos fibers. In 1990, the potentially responsible parties
submitted a work plan for the technical designs and specifications for the final cleanup at the
site. The design work is scheduled to be completed in 1992.
New Vernon and White Bridge Roads: In 1991, the EPA selected in-situ
solidification/stabilization treatment technology as the remedy to clean up the
New Vernon and White Bridge Road subsites. A treatability study was initiated in
late 1991 and is scheduled to be completed in 1992. The technical designs and specifications
of the remedy began in early 1992, with actual cleanup scheduled to begin in late 1992.
ASBESTOS DUMP 7 March 1992
-------
Dietzman Tract: The potentially responsible party began a study in 1991, under
EPA supervision, to determine the nature and extent of contamination and to
identify cleanup alternatives. Upon completion of the investigation, the EPA will
recommend a cleanup strategy.
Site Facts: The EPA and the National Gypsum Company signed an Administrative Order
on Consent in 1985, under which the company agreed to perform site studies. In 1989, the
EPA issued a Unilateral Order to the National Gypsum Company to perform cleanup
activities at the Millington area.
Environmental Progress
The restabilization of the Passaic River bank has reduced the potential for additional
contamination of surface water at the Asbestos Dump site. The temporary actions performed
at the New Vernon and White Bridge Road sites have also reduced the potential for
exposure to contaminants while further studies are being completed and final cleanup
activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Passaic Township Library, 91 Central Avenue, Stirling, NJ 07980
March 1992
ASBESTOS DUMP
-------
BEACHWOOD/
BERKELEY WE
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980654123
EPA REGION 2
Ocean County
etween the Garden State Parkway and
Route 9
Other Names:
Beachwood Plaza Shopping Center
Site Description
The Beachwood/Berkeley Wells site lies in the New Jersey Pinelands area, which consists of
reserved, protected, and preserved lands in Berkeley Township and Beachwood Borough. In
1982, a citizen's call prompted well water analyses that discovered lead in 20 percent of the
Beachwood wells and 4 percent of the Berkeley wells sampled. As of 1982, County health
officials closed 128 residential wells served by the Cohansey Aquifer due to excessive levels of
lead. This aquifer is the major source of drinking water for area residents. The New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) immediately ordered
Beachwood Borough to extend its public water supply to all homes within the Borough east
of the Garden State Parkway and required all homes in that area to connect to it. In 1986,
the EPA studied Beachwood homes using public water and Berkeley homes using well water.
The overall result of the investigation indicated that residential plumbing systems are the
primary cause for lead contamination, with a minor contribution from the area's native
groundwater. Beachwood Borough is densely populated and is located in an urban setting.
Berkeley Township is more rural and not densely populated. Groundwater distributed through
both public and private wells serves nearly 21,000 people.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal, State, and local actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/01/82
Final Date: 09/01/83
Deletion Date: 01/06/92
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater contained elevated levels of lead. Drinking water contaminated with
lead from pipeline corrosion was a possible health threat. The site lies in the New
Jersey Pinelands area, a noted wildlife habitat and groundwater recharge area.
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site was addressed through an emergency action; further investigations showed that no
other cleanup actions were required.
Response Action Status
Emergency Action: In 1982, the Ocean County Health Department closed 128
private wells with elevated lead levels and provided bottled water for affected
residents in Beachwood Borough and Berkeley Township. In late 1983,
construction of the water supply system expansion was completed.
Entire Site: The EPA attributed lead contamination at this site to corrosive
groundwater acting naturally on components in the plumbing systems and
recommended no further cleanup action. The State took over future responsibility
for the site. State and local health officials continue to educate local homeowners on how to
minimize the effects of lead in the drinking water. The site was deleted from the NPL in
early 1992.
Site Facts: In 1982, an Administrative Order was issued by NJDEPE that required
Beachwood Borough to extend the public water supply system to all Borough homes east of
the Garden State Parkway and required all these homes within the Borough to be connected
to the public water supply system.
Environmental Progress
The emergency actions described above eliminated the possibility of drinking contaminated
groundwater at the Beachwood/Berkeley Wells site. Since the contamination at the site is due
to natural conditions of the groundwater, the EPA recommended that no further actions be
taken. The safety of nearby residents is protected through connection to safe drinking water
supplies. The site was officially deleted from the NPL in early 1992.
Site Repository
Berkeley Township Library, 42 Station Road, Bayville, NJ 08721
March 1992 10 BEACHWOOD/BERKELEY WELLS
-------
BOG CREEK FAR
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD063157150
EPA REGION 2
Monmouth County
Howell Township
Site Description
A 4-acre disposal area lies on the 12-acre Bog Creek Farm and consists of a pond, bog, and
trench. Between 1973 and 1974, organic solvents and paint residues were dumped around a
trench in the eastern part of the property. Waste sampling revealed a wide variety of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals. Some chemicals moved into the groundwater,
which carried them to the pond and bog, as well as to the north branch of Squankum Brook.
Contaminant levels in the north branch of Squankum Brook decrease markedly with distance
from the site and do not appear to have an appreciable effect on the Manasquan River. The
site lies in a rural, agricultural, and recreational area. Farms raising horses, nursery stock,
vegetables, grain, sod, and flowers are situated nearby. The Allaire State Park is 1/2 mile east
of the site and is used by golfers, fishermen, hunters, and equestrians. There are two homes
on the site and several more about 500 feet to the northwest, on Squankum Park Road.
Approximately 900 people live within 1 mile of the site. Farmingdale, 3 miles north of the
site, has approximately 1,400 residents. Groundwater is the sole drinking water source for
residents near the site and is also used for irrigation. Nearby surface waters are used for
recreation.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater and surface water contain various VOCs. Sediments are
contaminated with VOCs, phthalates, and pesticides. The soil is contaminated with
VOCs, pesticides, and heavy metals. Sludges on site contain VOCs and heavy
metals. Direct contact with contaminated surface water, sediments, or soil, or
accidental ingestion of contaminated groundwater or soil may pose a threat to the
health of the nearby population.
11
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: initial actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on source control at the site and groundwater and sediment cleanup.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1984, the site owner pumped wastes from the disposal pits,
hauled the wastes to an EPA-approved landfill, and backfilled the pits.
Source Control: Beginning in 1984, the EPA installed test pits, trenches, and
monitoring wells on site as part of the investigation to determine the nature and
extent of contamination. In 1985, the EPA selected a remedy for controlling the
source of the contamination including: removing wastewater and sediments from the pond
and bog; regrading and covering the pond and bog; treating the wastewater in an on-site
plant and discharging cleaned water to the nearby stream; excavating the contaminated waste
deposits and soil; incinerating excavated materials, including the contaminated sediments from
the north branch of Squankum Brook, and disposing of the incinerated residues on site or at
an EPA-approved facility off site; conducting further analysis of the soil left behind to see if
further cleanup is necessary; evaluating innovative technologies to treat remaining soil, if
necessary; covering the excavated area with a compacted soil cap; building a security fence
around the work areas; and starting a monitoring program to assess the effectiveness and
reliability of the cleanup strategy. The EPA completed the engineering design for this remedy
in 1988. All incineration activities and most source control actions were completed in late
1990. The remaining source control actions were completed in 1991.
Groundwater and Sediment Cleanup: In 1989, the EPA selected a remedy for
cleaning up groundwater and brook sediments on and around the site including:
extracting, treating, and reinjecting groundwater via the on-site water treatment
plant to restore the Upper Kirkwood Aquifer to identified cleanup goals; and excavating and
incinerating contaminated sediments from the north branch of Squankum Brook and
disposing of the incineration residues on site. To speed the cleanup process, all sediments
were excavated and incinerated under the source control phase of the cleanup in 1990. The
pump and treat activity is the final component in the site cleanup. This phase is expected to
begin in 1992.
Environmental Progress
Pumping water, removing the wastes from the pits, and completing the source control cleanup
activities have reduced the potential for exposure to contaminated materials at the Bog
Creek Farm site while further cleanup activities addressing contaminated groundwater are
taking place.
March 1992 12 BOG CREEK FARM
-------
Site Repository
Howell Township Public Library, Preventorium Road, Howell, NJ 07731
BOG CREEK FARM
13
March 1992
-------
BRICK
LANDFILL
NFW IFR9FY X^^/l °17 Other Names:
IMCVV UCriOCLT Vv^ ./I >V French's Landfill
EPA ID# NJD980505176 S\ ^Pf &C7 McCormick's Dump
Site Description
The 42-acre Brick Township Landfill operated for more than 30 years, accepting sewage,
septage, solids, bulk liquids, and other wastes. Chemical wastes were reportedly disposed of at
the landfill in 1971, although this has never been documented. The landfill was privately
owned until 1973, when it was acquired and operated by Brick Township until it was closed in
1979. Although the site partially is fenced, trespassers frequently enter. Contaminants appear
to be migrating from the landfill with the groundwater in a southeasterly direction.
Approximately 3,000 people live within a 1-mile radius of the site. Residential areas are
nearby, and new development has started. Groundwater is the source of public and private
drinking supplies for the 58,000 people living within a 3-mile radius of the site. Sampling
indicates no contamination of either private or municipal wells that are used as drinking
water sources.
D««««^«-usr* TU- v • u • AA A^ u LISTING HISTORY
Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Sampling in 1987 showed elevated levels of cadmium and a low-level presence of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in some monitoring wells in and around the
site. Sediments and leachate are contaminated with various heavy metals. VOCs
are found in soil from a test pit, and pesticides are found in the septage pits. Area
residences are connected to a municipal water well. However, some private wells
not used for drinking water are being used for industrial purposes and for lawn and
garden maintenance. Ingestion of or contact with contaminated groundwater may
pose a health threat.
14 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an immediate action and a long-term remedial
phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: In 1982, Brick Township, under State monitoring, conducted
a surface cleanup at the site, including removing about 150 aboveground drums
and filling and venting three septage pits.
Entire Site: Presently, the Brick Township Landfill Action Committee is
investigating the contamination at the site and is evaluating cleanup alternatives.
Field work was completed in 1990. The study is scheduled for completion in 1993,
at which time the EPA will select the remedies for the cleanup of the site. A field
investigation in 1992 did not detect any additional buried drums at the site.
Site Facts: In 1982, the State and Brick Township entered into a Consent Order that
required the Township to conduct a surface cleanup of the site. In 1985, the Order was
amended to establish a Brick Township Landfill Action Committee, composed of State and
Township officials, to perform a long-term study and clean up the site.
Environmental Progress
The removal of drums and filling and venting of septage pits have reduced the potential for
exposure to contaminated materials at the Brick Township Landfill site while further studies
are being completed and final cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Brick Township Public Library, 401 Chambers Bridge Road, Brick Town, NJ 08723
BRICK TOWNSHIP LANDFILL 15 March 1992
-------
Other Names:
Bridgeport Water Line
EPA REGION 2
Gloucester County
RENTAL & OIL
SERVICES
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD053292652
Site Description
The 30-acre Bridgeport Rental & Oil Services site is a former waste oil storage and recovery
facility located in Logan Township, 1 mile east of Bridgeport and 2 miles south of the
Delaware River. The property bears a tank farm consisting of approximately 100 tanks and
process vessels, drums, tank trucks, and a 13-acre waste oil and wastewater lagoon. The
facility is no longer in operation. A court order prohibits commercial waste handling activities
here. Wastes remain in the lagoon and in the storage tanks. The lagoon contains about 2 1/2
million gallons of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-contaminated oil, 60,000 cubic yards of
PCB-contaminated sediments and sludge, and 70 million gallons of contaminated wastewater.
The wastewater, as well as the on-site groundwater, is contaminated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). Pollution has migrated in the groundwater up to 600 feet away from the
lagoon. The storage tanks contain sludge and sediment material similar to that in the lagoon.
The area surrounding the site is primarily rural and agricultural. An active peach orchard
borders the site's western edge. Cedar Swamp, a tidal area, lies to the east and leads to Little
Timber Creek, a tributary of the Delaware River. The lagoon has threatened repeatedly to
breach its dike, and did so once in the early 1970s, causing widespread vegetative damage to
about 3 acres of land. The aquifer under the site is used for drinking water by about 800
people in the Bridgeport area. Groundwater is believed to flow generally north toward the
Delaware River, although local flow is radially directed away from the lagoon. Domestic
water supply wells lie to the north, northwest, and west of the site; 10 of them are within 50
to 1,000 feet of the site.
D«~« .-u-i-t . TU- v • u • AA A^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Federal and State actions. Final Date. Q9/08/83
16 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
PCBs and VOCs, including benzene and methylene chloride, have entered
groundwater from materials disposed of at the site. Sediments and sludges contain
PCBs and other organic contaminants and metals including lead, cadmium,
chromium, and barium. PCB-laden oil residues have been found in surface water.
Tanks on site contain materials similar to those in the lagoon. Individuals may be
at risk by drinking contaminated groundwater. The nearby tidal wetland is an
ecologically sensitive area; contamination threatens the habitat of the last White
Cedar Swamp fowl.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: emergency actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the lagoon, tank farm, and wells and treatment of
groundwater.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: The EPA sent emergency workers to the lagoon on the
several occasions when it threatened to overflow its dike. In 1981, the failing dike
was reinforced, raising the height by about 5 feet. In 1982, the EPA pumped
down the lagoon 2 feet and treated the liquids removed; affected homes were provided with
filtration units for their well water. In 1983, the lagoon level was lowered again by 2 feet. In
early 1984, an initial cleanup measure was taken to stop leaks from the southeastern corners
of the lagoon; in late 1984, workers returned for more cleanup activities when a failed boom
spilled 50 gallons of PCB-contaminated oil. In 1990, drums containing contaminants were
prepared and removed from the site to an EPA-approved facility. The two remaining drums
will be incinerated on site.
Lagoon, Tank Farm, and Wells: In 1984, the EPA selected the following
remedies for cleanup of the lagoon, tank farm, and wells: removing oily waste,
contaminated sludges, and polluted water from the lagoon and treating them by
on-site incineration; excavating and disposing of drums on the site; continuing to pump to
prevent the further spread of contaminated groundwater and to contain any pollutants that
may escape during lagoon excavation; removing all tanks and contained waste; and installing
a water supply line from Bridgeport to homes with contaminated wells. Between 1987 and
1988, 100 tanks, many of which still contained hazardous wastes, were demolished and
removed. More than 250,000 gallons of oils and sludges contaminated with PCBs and about 1
million gallons of liquids were removed from the tanks and taken to EPA-approved disposal
facilities, as was debris from the buildings, tanks, vessels, drums, and excavated pipelines. In
addition, about 21 million gallons of lagoon wastewater were treated through the on-site
treatment system. The drinking water line to 15 affected homes was completed in 1987. The
BRIDGEPORT RENTAL & OIL SERVICES 17 March 1992
-------
State undertook responsibility for the design and implementation of this action. In 1989, a
contract was awarded to commence cleanup by the incineration of lagoon wastes (oil,
sediment, and sludges) and area soils. Approximately 70 million gallons of lagoon wastewater
will be treated on site in the treatment system used previously. A successful trial burn of the
incineration unit was completed in early 1991. The incineration unit began full-scale operation
in late 1991. This process is expected to take approximately 3 years.
Groundwater: The EPA is undertaking a second study of the site to determine
what the best strategies will be for cleaning up groundwater and related
contamination. The investigation has been initiated and is slated for completion in
1993.
Site Facts: In June 1982, the Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, entered into a
Consent Decree with the owners and operators of the site under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Environmental Progress
The numerous emergency cleanup actions taken at the Bridgeport Rental & Oil facility have
reduced the potential for accidental contact with hazardous materials left on site. The
majority of contaminated drums located on the site have been removed. Additionally, local
residents have been provided with safe drinking water. The EPA has determined that the site
is safe while further investigations leading to a final selection of a remedy for the
groundwater and related contamination are taking place.
Site Repository
Logan Township Library, Center Square Road and School Lane, Swedesboro, NJ 08085
March 1992
18
BRIDGEPORT RENTAL & OIL SERVICES
-------
BROOK INDUSTI
PARK i^i^-—^XJfc/ Bound Brook
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD078251675 X 2\ \ % Blue Spruce Chemical
Site Description
The Brook Industrial Park, a 4 1/2-acre complex of light industries and warehouses, lies on
the northern bank of the Raritan River in a heavily industrialized area of Bound Brook. The
site is flanked by railroads and a commercial and residential area. The facility dates back to
the late 1800s, but the operations of concern have a more recent tenure. Industrial, chemical,
and pesticide production and storage began in 1971, when Blue Spruce Chemical occupied
part of the facility. Several operations were cited for poor housekeeping and waste disposal
practices. Several shops of concern have operated in the industrial park, including Blue
Spruce Chemical, Jame Fine Chemicals, Inc., and National Metal Finishings Corp. Jame Fine
Chemicals' history of waste handling featured the direct discharge of wastewater to the
Raritan; open storage of waste oils, sludge, and organic wastes; and suspected discharge of
wastewater into a septic tank and leachfield in an unknown location. National Metal
Finishings dumped organic solvents and heavy metal wastes into unlined cinder block pits
inside its facility; wastewater levels in these pits reportedly rise and fall with the water table
levels. Blue Spruce International produced pesticides that were banned in the U.S. and could
only be exported. The facility stored Agent Orange, which contains traces of dioxin. The
company stored as many as 300 drums containing .a wide range of hazardous compounds on
the site. Blue Spruce Chemical is suspected of discharging pesticide wastes to the drainage
ditch and the Raritan River and was cited for illegally discharging chemicals to the Industrial
Sewage Pumping Station, where workers reportedly became ill as a result. Workers at nearby
operations also have become ill from releases from the site. An alleyway between this
company and a neighboring corporation was found to be contaminated with dioxin and
became the focus of an EPA emergency response. The materials that several shops used or
processed have mixed and migrated into the groundwater. The surrounding area is heavily
industrialized and residential. Public and private wells within 3 miles of the site provide water
to an estimated 613,000 people. One private well lies within 1/4 mile of the site. However,
these wells are believed to be upgradient of the site. The Raritan River, adjacent to the site,
is used for recreational and commercial purposes.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
Final Date. 10/04/89
19 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The building flooring, as well as soils and waters in the basement at Blue Spruce
Chemical, contains a wide variety of pesticides and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). Dioxin was detected in the flooring and basement soil. Many pesticides
have been found in monitoring wells downgradient from the site. Sludge and
discharges from sewers at Jame Fine Chemicals contain VOCs. Outdoor soils at
Blue Spruce Chemical are contaminated with pesticides, VOCs, and dioxin.
Outdoor soils at Jame Fine Chemicals contain VOCs, heavy metals, and
inorganics. At National Metal Finishings Corp., a subsurface pit revealed
contamination with heavy metals, VOCs, and inorganics. Surface water on the site
and runoff to the Raritan River are contaminated with pesticides and inorganic
chemicals. Direct contact with or accidental ingestion of contaminated soil, surface
water, or groundwater may cause adverse health effects.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: emergency actions and a long-term remedial phase
directed at cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1983, the EPA used emergency funds to seal and lock
the Blue Spruce Chemical facility and to cover the dioxin-contaminated area with
asphalt. In 1990, fencing was installed, and a building was made secure on a
portion of the site to eliminate accidental contact with possible contaminants. In 1992, the
site was re-secured and the lock on the door was replaced.
Entire Site: In 1989, the EPA began an intensive study of pollution problems at
this complex site. The investigation is exploring the nature and extent of soil and
groundwater pollution and will recommend the best strategies for final cleanup. It
is scheduled for completion in 1993. The investigation will focus on several facilities within
Brook Industrial Park that are believed to be contributors to the contamination.
Site Facts: In April 1980, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy (NJDEPE) filed an Administrative Order on Consent citing Jame Fine Chemicals for
illegal discharge of cooling water to the Raritan River. In December 1980, the NJDEPE
issued an Administrative Order to Blue Spruce Chemical ordering immediate cleanup of the
facility. In August 1985, the NJDEPE cited National Metal Finishing Corp. and Brook
Industrial Park for unlicensed discharges of metal plating waste into groundwater starting in
1977.
March 1992 20 BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK
-------
Environmental Progress
Closing the Blue Spruce Chemical facility, covering the dioxin-contaminated areas with
asphalt, and fencing in a portion of the site have reduced the potential for exposure to
hazardous materials at the Brook Industrial Park site. Analysis of site conditions has led the
EPA to determine that no further immediate actions are needed while studies and
development of final remedies are proceeding.
Site Repository
Bound Brook Public Library, 402 East High Street, Bound Brook, NJ 08805
BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK
21
March 1992
-------
BURNT FLY
N EW J ERSEY / AT Middlesex County
EPA ID* NJD980504997 ^ -^ HiJtl Mar,boro Township
Site Description
Burnt Fly Bog is a semi-rural area covering about 1,700 acres, mostly in Marlboro Township,
but extending into Middlesex County near Marlboro and also near the New Jersey Pine
Barrens. An auto salvage yard, a few scattered residences, and a horse farm are located
nearby. Contamination at the site began during the 1950s and the early 1960s, with the direct
dumping and spreading of hazardous materials in the upland portion of the bog referred to as
the Uplands Area. Treatment and disposal facilities for oily wastes at the edge of the site
were poorly built and improperly operated. Over the years, this site was operated by several
owners, and the facilities degenerated into several abandoned waste oil lagoons, a
contaminated asphalt waste pile, a tar patch area, buried and exposed drummed wastes, and
contaminated soil and Northerly Wetlands area, both resulting from lagoon overflow. About
10 acres were directly contaminated. In addition to the oil reprocessing activities, the site was
subjected to sanitary landfilling and sand and gravel pit operations. Uncontrolled discharges
from all these upland waste sources to adjoining wetlands have resulted in groundwater and
oil contamination over a 60-acre expanse referred to as the Westerly Wetlands. The site is a
groundwater discharge area for the Englishtown Aquifer. Groundwater flows to the surface
and drains into Deep Run. The nearest people are located about 1,000 feet away from the
site, and the nearest well is 200 feet away. Approximately 1,100 people live within a 1-mile
radius; 15,000 people within a 3-mile radius rely on public or private wells for their drinking
water supplies. Streams and wetlands drain the site, and surface water is used for recreation.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING "'STORY
Federal and State actions.
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
22 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Soils and sediments contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and lead. Surface
water contains lead from runoff from the adjacent wetlands. Individuals may come
in contact with site contaminants by accidentally ingesting polluted soils or dusts;
eating fish, wild berries, or wild game from the bog; or inhaling the toxic products
of burning PCBs during a fire such as one that occurred on the site in 1973. The
site is located in a fringe area of the environmentally sensitive New Jersey Pine
Barrens. In addition, further endangerment of Deep Run could threaten the
drinking water of residents in Perth Amboy, who use the stream as a potable water
supply source.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in four stages: emergency actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the uplands area, cleanup of the Westerly Wetlands, and
further investigations for final cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1982, the EPA emergency crews went to work in the
upland section of the site. They repaired the earthen dike the State had built to
hold back lagoon contents. They also installed a security fence around the lagoons
and drums.
Uplands Area: The EPA selected a remedy to clean up the Uplands Area in
1983, which included: excavating hazardous substances in lagoon 1, the asphalt pile
area, the tar patch area, and the drummed waste area, and disposing of them off
site in EPA-approved facilities; excavating and removing hazardous materials in lagoons 2, 3,
and 4, the northerly wetlands, and the contaminated soils area; restoring the original site
contours and replanting the area; designing a comprehensive five-year groundwater
monitoring program and testing eight residential wells; and studying the Westerly Wetlands
further to determine the extent of contamination there. All the contaminated soil and sludge
has been excavated. Nearly 85,000 tons of soil have been removed and disposed of at
approved landfills. This total includes approximately 10,000 tons of stabilized sludge.
Approximately 1,000 tons of PCB-contaminated sludge remain on the site, awaiting removal
and incineration. The final disposal of this sludge is expected to occur in late 1992.
BURNT FLY BOG 23 March 1992
-------
Westerly Wetlands: The interim remedy selected for this area includes:
excavating 5,600 cubic yards of contaminated materials that have migrated past
the Westerly Wetlands to the downstream area; disposing of these substances in
the same manner in which Upland Area wastes were handled; containing the contaminated
soils in the Westerly Wetlands by means of a sedimentation basin and appropriate diversion
controls; building a security fence and access road around the Westerly Wetlands; and
conducting a study on treatment alternatives for the Westerly Wetlands, the Northerly
Wetlands, and the contaminated soils area. The State began the engineering design for this
remedy in 1989; it is scheduled for completion in late 1992. The final remedy for
contaminated soils will be determined based on the study to be conducted as part of the long-
term cleanup phase for the entire site.
Entire Site: The State has initiated an intensive study designed to identify the
final remedy for contaminated materials in the Westerly Wetlands, the Northerly
Wetlands, and the contaminated soils area. This investigation includes a wetlands
assessment and an environmental impact study to determine if any harmful effects will occur
during cleanup of the wetlands.
Environmental Progress
Construction of a dike and security fence around the lagoons and drums by the EPA
emergency crews, and the removal and disposal of the contaminated soils and sludge in the
Uplands area have reduced the potential for accidental contact with hazardous materials and
for contaminated liquids to migrate from the site. The site has been determined to be safe
while further cleanup remedies are being planned.
Site Repository
Monmouth County Library, Marlboro Branch Library, 1 Library Court, Marlboro, NJ 07746
March 1992 24 BURNT FLY BOG
-------
CALDWELL
TRUCKING C
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD048798953
EPA REGION 2
Essex County
Fairfield Township
Other Names:
Fairfield Boro Site
Site Description
The 11-acre Caldwell Trucking Co. site consists of two lots that were used for the disposal of
residential, commercial, and industrial septic waste. Wastes were deposited in unlined lagoons
from the early 1950s until 1973. The liquid phase was pumped out and trucked to a large
seepage lagoon located in the far northwestern portion of the site. The seepage lagoon was
utilized from 1968 to 1973. After 1973, the company installed underground storage tanks to
store the wastes transported to the site. All the unlined lagoons were backfilled, with the
exception of one that was covered with plywood. By 1984, the tanks were no longer used, and
the company operated solely as a transport facility until 1988, when it ceased operations.
There are about 500 single family homes located in a populated area within 1 mile of the site.
Since 1981, over 100 private wells and two municipal wells in the area have been taken out of
service due to contamination. The affected residents have been transferred to a municipal
water supply. The contaminated groundwater plume originating from the site flows north
toward the Passaic River, which is used for recreational activities.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
ZEJ
The groundwater on- and off-site is contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) including trichloroethylene (TCE). Metals, polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and VOCs were detected
in on-site subsurface soils. Metals were also detected in on-site surface soils. VOCs
were detected in off-site surface water in an unnamed tributary to Deepavaal
Brook, the brook itself, and the Passaic River. Drinking contaminated groundwater
is a potential health threat. Other health threats include direct contact with or
accidental ingestion of contaminated surface water or soils.
25
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the entire site and off-site contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Several actions were implemented in 1990 to reduce the
potential for exposure to site contaminants. Chain-link gates and fences were
installed at critical points to restrict site access. The exposed lagoon and the four
underground storage tanks were covered and surrounded with snow fencing. Portions of an
access road were covered with geotextile fabric and stone to minimize exposure to trespassing
dirt bike riders. Warning signs were posted on the fences and at the entrance to the site.
Entire Site: The first cleanup phase is separated into three phases including
residential water line hookups, restoration of municipal well No. 7, and cleanup of
the site. In late 1986, cleanup technologies to address site contamination were
selected including: excavating and treating, through the addition of heat, approximately 28,000
cubic yards of contaminated soils and waste materials; disposing of treated soils in a secure
landfill to be constructed at the site in accordance with Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) requirements; restoring a lost potable water resource by providing treatment,
through air stripping, of municipal public water supply well No. 7; providing an alternate
water supply for residents potentially affected by groundwater contamination from the site;
and preparing a supplemental investigation (of off-site contamination) to identify the extent
and other sources of groundwater contamination and to develop and evaluate appropriate
cleanup alternatives. In the summer of 1989, the EPA connected 55 homes and nine
commercial establishments in the plume area to municipal water. In 1990, the Fairfield Town
Council decided to continue purchasing water from the Passaic Valley Water Commission,
and forgo the use of municipal well No. 7 as a source of potable water. The EPA is finalizing
the technical specifications and design for the excavation, treatment, and disposal of
contaminated soils and waste material at the site. These cleanup activities are scheduled to
begin in late 1992.
Off-Site Contamination: After the off-site study was completed in 1989, the
remedy to cleanup the off-site contaminants was selected. The remedy called for
the installation of groundwater recovery wells at various locations throughout the
area to intercept contaminated groundwater. An air stripper will be constructed on site to
treat the extracted groundwater. The treated effluent will be discharged to either Deepavaal
Brook or the Passaic River. Design of this cleanup action is currently underway. Pumping and
treating of the groundwater may last up to 30 years.
March 1992 26 CALDWELL TRUCKING CO.
-------
Environmental Progress
The provision of an alternative drinking water supply to the affected homes and businesses in
the area of the Caldwell Trucking Co. site has reduced the potential for exposure to
contaminated groundwater. Site restriction measures, along with the covering of open
lagoons, have reduced the risk of exposure to on-site contaminants while the design of the
final cleanup activities is underway.
Site Repository
Anthony Pio Costa Memorial Library, 261 Hollywood Avenue, Fairfield, NJ 07004
CALDWELL TRUCKING CO.
27
March 1992
-------
CHEMICAL CONTR
NEW JERSEY r Elizabeth
EPA ID# NJD000607481
Site Description
The Chemical Control (CC) site consists of a 2 acre parcel of land adjacent to the Elizabeth
River. The site area, formerly a marsh, is flat and barely above sea level. The surrounding
area is mostly industrial. From 1970 to 1978, CC operated as a hazardous waste storage,
treatment, and disposal facility, accepting various types of chemicals including: acids, arsenic,
bases, cyanides, flammable solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), compressed gases,
biological agents, and pesticides. Throughout its operations, CC was cited for discharge and
waste storage violations. In 1979, the State of New Jersey initiated a site cleanup that
included bulk solids and liquids, drums at and below the soil surface, gas cylinders, infectious
wastes, radioactive wastes, highly explosive liquids, debris, tanks, and 3 feet of soil. Excavated
soil areas were replaced with a 3-foot gravel cover. An explosion and fire in 1980 interrupted
the site cleanup and created additional cleanup needs by destroying the site and reportedly
launching drums of burning waste into the air. Contaminated runoff from firefighting efforts
entered the Elizabeth River. After the fire and explosion, the cleanup was accelerated and
was completed in 1981. As of 1983, the site was a fenced gravel lot with approximately 200
gas cylinders and 11 trailers waiting for disposal. Contaminated soil remains under the gravel.
The storm drains at the site also have been blocked. There are approximately 14,250
residents within 1 mile of the site. One residence is located within 200 feet of the site, and
densely populated neighborhoods are located across the Elizabeth River. Drinking water
comes from surface water sources.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through proposed Date: 10/23/81
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Final Date: 09/08/83
The sediments of the Elizabeth River and the on-site soils are contaminated with
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), pesticides, acid and base/neutral extractables,
and metals. The subsurface soil is contaminated with VOCs. Eating contaminated
fish, shellfish, crabs, and other marine organisms and direct contact with sediments
in the Elizabeth River may be potential health threats. Other industrial pollution
sources in the area probably contribute to contamination in the Elizabeth River.
The site is located near estuaries and critical habitats for estuarine fauna; these
areas could be threatened by contaminated waters and sediments.
28 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases directed at controlling the source of contamination and cleaning up the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA performed immediate actions at the site to
ensure public and environmental safety. These actions included: packing gas
cylinders in safe containers and installing additional pressure gauges on them;
removing and decontaminating 11 box trailers and one vacuum truck; clearing plugged storm
sewers; sampling and removing 187 gas cylinders that were left at the site and one taken from
the Elizabeth River; designing a device used for sampling and compressing gases into new
cylinders; performing a limited site investigation and a focused evaluation of the alternatives
for cleanup to confirm reports that drums from the site had entered the river; and removing
all the containers that were found adjacent to the site.
Source Control: After performing the immediate actions described above, the
EPA installed new cylinder gauges, reconstructed storm sewer catch basins and
grates, constructed curbing to prevent runoff of contaminated sediments, and
decontaminated five box trailers. The gas cylinder cleanup is complete. Harmless gases were
vented, while certain easily treated gases were neutralized on site. Dangerous gases have
been shipped off site for proper disposal. The EPA transported all hazardous materials
generated by these cleanup actions to a federally approved disposal site. All activities for this
stage of site cleanup were completed by 1990.
Entire Site: The cleanup technologies that were chosen in 1987 to address
VOC-contaminated soil on site include: combining the contaminated soil with a
solidification agent that will harden so that the contaminants cannot migrate from
the site; removing debris from earlier cleanup actions, including water collected while
installing monitoring wells, items recovered from the Elizabeth River under the initial cleanup
action, used disposable equipment, and the decontamination pad; sealing the sanitary sewer
line under the site where it connects to the South Front Street storm sewer; repairing the
berm that separates the site from the Elizabeth River; and collecting and analyzing
environmental samples to ensure the effectiveness of the remedy, including an evaluation
after five years to assess its protectiveness of public health and the environment. A pilot study
determined that the soil solidification is effective in binding the contaminants and reducing
their mobility. The potentially responsible parties are designing the technical specifications for
the remedy. It is expected to be completed in 1992. Construction of the remedy is scheduled
to be started in 1993.
Site Facts: In January 1979, the State placed the company in receivership. In 1990, the EPA
and 179 potentially responsible parties signed a Consent Decree, under which the parties
agreed to design the remedy and perform the remaining cleanup activities at the site. The
Consent Decree was entered by the courts in November 1991.
CHEMICAL CONTROL 29 March 1992
-------
Environmental Progress
The EPA has performed numerous immediate actions and eliminated the source of
contamination at the Chemical Control site, which have reduced the potential for exposure to
hazardous materials. The EPA is presently overseeing the design phase for the selected
remedies, and has determined that the site is safe while it awaits final cleanup activities.
Site Repository
Office of the Director, City of Elizabeth, Department of Health, Welfare and Housing,
50 Winfield Scott Plaza, Room G5, Elizabeth, NJ 07201
March 1992
30
CHEMICAL CONTROL
-------
CHEMICAL T\ EPA REGION 2
UnCIVIIOML.
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of contaminated surface water runoff and cleanup of source
materials and groundwater.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: A 6-foot chain-link fence, encompassing a portion of the
existing fence, was constructed to restrict access to the detected contaminants.
Warning signs were posted at the site and along the unnamed tributary and Mill
Brook. An action was also taken in response to the overflow of a drainage ditch to a parking
lot adjacent to the site. Contaminated surface water was removed from the parking lot and
the drainage ditch was unclogged and reinforced to prevent future overflows. Risks associated
with contaminated surface water runoff were reduced, but not eliminated by this action.
Contaminated Surface Water Runoff: Actions selected for cleanup include:
grading the site; installing an impermeable cap over the site; and installing a
system for the controlled release of uncontaminated runoff from the cap. The
technical design for these activities was completed in 1991, and construction began in 1992.
Source Materials and Groundwater: The EPA is conducting an investigation
of the sources of hazardous waste materials and groundwater contamination. Once
the investigation is completed, expected in 1992, alternate options for cleanup will
be identified.
Environmental Progress
Installation of a security fence around the Chemical Insecticide Corporation site and the
other actions taken to control the migration of the contamination have reduced the
immediate threat to the surrounding community and the environment while the cleanup of
contaminated surface water, source materials, and groundwater is being addressed.
Site Repository
Edison Public Library, 340 Plainfield Avenue, Edison, NJ 08817
March 1992 32 CHEMICAL INSECTICIDE CORPORATION
-------
EPA REGION 2
Gloucester County
LEAMAN i>^K \™ Logan Township
TANK LINES, INj
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD047321443
Site Description
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. has operated a tank-washing facility since 1961 on a
34-acre site in Bridgeport, New Jersey. The wastewater generated was placed in a series of
seven unlined lagoons and ultimately was discharged to Cedar Swamp and Moss Branch
Creek which border the site. In 1975, sludge in the settling lagoons was excavated and
disposed of off site. The lagoons were then backfilled with clean sand. The aeration lagoons
were backfilled with sand and construction debris, but no sludge was removed. In 1980 and
1981, the State found carbon tetrachloride and other organics in the groundwater on the site
as well as in neighboring private wells. Logan Township has a population of approximately
3,000 residents. Agriculture accounts for about one-third of the land use; more than half the
site is undeveloped marshes and woodlands. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. is in an area
zoned for light industry. About 50 homes are within a 1/2-mile radius. The residences located
near the site have individual domestic water supply wells, although many have not been used
for drinking water since contaminants were discovered in the water in the 1970s. In 1987,
residences north of the site along Route 44 were connected to the Bridgeport Municipal
Water System.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Final Date: 09/21/84
33 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater on site is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
including trichloroethene, benzene, and vinyl chloride and heavy metals including
arsenic, chromium, and zinc. Many of the same contaminants have been found in
private wells off site. Contaminants found in subsurface soils include heavy metals,
VOCs, and phthalates. Those who use water from VOC-contaminated wells for
bathing, clothes washing, or other uses may come in contact with touch or inhale
contaminants. Area homes have either been connected to the municipal water
supplies or received bottled water. The contaminated on-site well is used for tank
trailer washing operations. Workers could be exposed to VOCs through direct
contact with or inhalation of contaminants evaporating from the water during
these operations, as well as from residual chemicals flushed out of the tank trailers
during washing procedures. The pollution of Moss Branch Creek and other
surrounding marshes, wetlands, and woodlands may be from the migrating
contaminants in the groundwater.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in four stages: immediate actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the groundwater contamination, soil contamination, and the
wetlands.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In a cooperative action between the State of New Jersey
and the EPA, activated carbon treatment units were placed in the four homes
with contaminated drinking water. The four homes later were connected to a
permanent water line from a nearby town. The EPA is planning to connect four more homes
to the municipal water line as well.
Groundwater Contamination: In 1989, the EPA took over the responsibility of
investigating the groundwater, source areas, and non-wetlands soil and conducting
the possible cleanup actions. The investigation was completed in mid-1990.
Cleanup remedies selected include groundwater extraction; treatment of groundwater through
chemical precipitation, air stripping, and granulated activated carbon; and discharge of treated
groundwater into the Delaware River. The design of the selected remedy began in 1991 and
is expected to be completed in 1993.
Soil Contamination: Sampling of on-site soils to determine the extent of soil
contamination was completed in spring 1990. The EPA has completed an
investigation of the soil contamination; however, recommendations for cleanup will
not be issued until more data become available during the design phase of the groundwater
cleanup.
March 1992 34 CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC.
-------
Wetlands: An investigation into the nature and extent of contamination in the
wetlands began in 1990 and is scheduled for completion in late 1993. At that time,
recommendations on final cleanup methods will be made.
Site Facts: Chemical Leaman Tank Lines Inc., the potentially responsible party, entered into
a Consent Order in July 1985 to perform the site investigation and develop the alternative
cleanup activities. In June 1989, the EPA took over and completed the groundwater study.
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. entered into a Consent Decree in April 1991 to design
the technologies and to perform the cleanup work for groundwater contamination at this site.
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. also entered into a Consent Order with the EPA to
construct a waterline extension to the homes in the vicinity of the site not receiving municipal
water.
Environmental Progress
The affected homes to the north of the Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. site have been
connected to an alternate water supply. Affected homes located to the south and west of the
site will be connected to an alternate water supply in 1992, thereby reducing the potential for
exposure to contaminated groundwater while final groundwater cleanup remedies are being
designed and further investigations leading to the selection of final remedies for the soil and
wetlands contamination are taking place.
Site Repository
Township Clerk's Office, Logan Township Municipal Building, 73 Main Street,
Bridgeport, NJ 08014
CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC.
35
March 1992
-------
IMP
IIMU.
EPA REGION 2
Middlesex County
NEW JERSEY C M Piscatawa*
EPA ID# NJD980528889
Site Description
Chemsol, Inc. is a 40-acre site in Piscataway, New Jersey. This inactive site was used as a
solvent recovery and waste reprocessing facility in the 1950s through approximately 1964. The
facility was closed after a series of industrial accidents, explosions, and fires. The site was
purchased by Tang Realty in 1978. Between 1980 and 1990, approximately 40 groundwater
monitoring wells were installed by Tang Realty on site or downgradient from the site.
Sampling from these monitoring wells and from soil indicated that groundwater was
contaminated with organic compounds and soil was contaminated with polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) and organic compounds. The State determined that 40 drums of chemical
wastes were buried at the site. Soils in and around the site have been contaminated from
leaking drums and other containers of unknown substances that were discovered and
excavated in 1988. Additionally, Tang Realty, the owner, excavated and disposed of over
3,700 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated site soils. During the soil excavations for removal of
PCB-contaminated soils, several thousand small (less than 1 gallon) containers of unknown
substances were discovered. These unknown substances were stored in a trailer on site. The
groundwater around the site is used mainly for industrial processes, although there are private
wells in the area. An estimated 36,000 people live within a 3-mile radius of the site, with the
nearest well and the nearest occupied building 400 feet away from the site. Residents in the
area obtained their drinking water from public and private wells. In 1990, municipal water
lines were extended into the area after sampling results indicated the presence of organic
contaminants in residential wells.
o-* r, -U-1-* -n.- •* • u • AA A^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
36 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as trichloroethylene (TCE), chloroform,
methylene chloride, and vinyl chloride; heavy metals such as arsenic; semi-volatile
organic compounds; and pesticides have contaminated on-site groundwater. Soils
may be contaminated by PCBs and organic compounds. Many of the hazardous
substances detected in the groundwater at the site are present at levels which far
exceed Federal and State standards and guidelines for groundwater. In addition,
the data collected to date demonstrate that groundwater contaminants have
migrated off the site. Direct contact with or accidental ingestion of contaminated
groundwater or soil may pose a health threat.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three phases: initial actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of groundwater and cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1988, over 3,700 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated soils were
removed from the site by Tang Realty. In 1990, municipal water service was
extended into the area. During 1990 and 1991, the unknown substances
discovered during soil excavations and stored in a trailer on site were analyzed for
compatibility; compatible wastes were grouped together for off-site disposal. By late 1991,
approximately 10,000 pounds of crushed lab pack bottles, 13,500 pounds of hazardous waste
solids, 615 gallons of hazardous waste liquids, and 150 pounds of sulfurtrioxide were disposed
of off site.
Groundwater: The EPA completed an investigation into site contamination. The
aim of this investigation was to evaluate interim cleanup actions to restrict off-site
migration of highly contaminated groundwater to a depth of approximately 130
feet. The selected interim remedy issued in late 1991 involves extraction of groundwater
underlying the site (to approximately 130 feet), treatment of the contaminated groundwater,
and discharge of the treated groundwater to a stream flowing along the eastern property
boundary of the site. Design of the interim remedy is expected to be completed in 1993, with
implementation of the interim remedy expected during 1994.
Entire Site: The EPA is conducting a study that focuses on potential off-site and
deeper groundwater contamination, as well as soil and possible air contamination.
Post-excavation soil sampling will be performed to determine the nature and
extent of soil contamination. Groundwater and residential well water sampling will continue.
Air samples will be collected and analyzed to determine potential air contamination. This
study is expected to be completed in 1994.
CHEMSOL, INC. 37 March 1992
-------
Site Facts: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy issued an
Administrative Consent Order to Tang Realty in 1983 and 1984 for the performance of a site
investigation. In March 1992, the EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to four
potentially responsible parties for the design and construction of the interim remedy. The
potentially responsible parties have complied with the Order and are proceeding with the
work.
Environmental Progress
The removal of the unknown substances from the on-site trailer and contaminated soils has
reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the Chemsol, Inc. site while an
interim remedy is being designed and further investigations leading to the selection of the
final cleanup remedy are taking place.
Site Repository
Kennedy Public Library, 500 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854
March 1992
38
CHEMSOL, INC.
-------
CIBA-GEIGY
N E W J E RS EY xx < Route 37 in Dover Township
Site Description
EPA ID# NJD001 50251 7 ,& Other Names:
Toms River Chemical
The Ciba-Geigy Corp. site, located in Toms River, New Jersey, is presently owned and
operated by the Ciba-Geigy Corporation. The site covers approximately 1,400 acres, 320 of
which are developed, with the remainder consisting of cleared areas, pine barrens, and
wetlands. The manufacturing facility has been in operation since 1952 and is composed of
numerous buildings, an industrial wastewater treatment plant, and a reservoir for emergency
storage of treated and untreated wastewater. From 1952 to 1990, a variety of synthetic
organic pigments, dyes, resins, and epoxy additives were manufactured at the site.
Manufacturing of pigments and dyestuffs ceased in 1988. The company disposed of sludges
and chemical wastes on site in the following locations: the drum disposal area containing
91,000 drums; a lime sludge and calcium sulfate disposal area which contains mainly inorganic
wastes; a 12-acre filtercake disposal area, which received sludge from wastewater treatment;
five backfilled lagoons comprising 8 1/2 acres; a 25-acre borrow/compactor debris disposal
area; and two additional equalization basins, 5 acres of which contain sludges from a former
treatment plant. The drum disposal area and the lime sludge disposal area were closed in
1978. About this time, the filtercake disposal area also was closed and covered with soil. The
EPA began investigating the site in 1980. The State issued a Consent Order forcing
Ciba-Geigy to close part of the landfill and to conduct groundwater monitoring.
Contamination from the source areas is leaching into the groundwater and discharging to the
Toms River and adjacent wetlands, which together comprise the eastern boundary of the site.
The groundwater in the area is tapped by municipal, industrial, and private wells. To the
north, south, and west, the site is bordered by light commercial, residential, and recreational
areas. The Township of Dover has an estimated population of 64,455 persons. There are 180
residential units located less than 1/2 mile to the north of the site and over 250 residential
units located less than 1/2 mile from the site's southern boundary. An elementary school is
located very near the site fence boundary.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Final Date: 09/08/83
39 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and soils are contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) including benzene, trichloroethylene (TCE), and toluene and heavy metals
including arsenic and chromium. The contaminated groundwater and soil could
pose a health hazard to the public if accidentally ingested or touched.
Contaminants from the site are migrating to the Toms River and wetlands, which
form the eastern boundary of the site. Winding River Park, an outdoor
recreational area situated in the flood plain of the Toms River, may also be
adversely affected by site contaminants.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in four phases: initial actions and three long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the groundwater, cleanup of the entire site, and source control.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1980, the potentially responsible parties removed 15,000
drums from the on-site sanitary landfill and initiated groundwater monitoring at
the site. As an interim measure, the potentially responsible parties are
withdrawing contaminated groundwater, treating it on site, and storing it until a system is
constructed to discharge it. Groundwater is being handled under a permit issued by the State
allowing the discharge of treated water if contamination has been reduced to safety levels.
Groundwater: The EPA decided on the following cleanup measures to protect
public health and the environment: sealing contaminated residential irrigation
wells; designing and constructing an on- and off-site groundwater extraction and
treatment system with subsequent discharge to the Toms River; and implementing a river and
groundwater monitoring program. All contaminated residential irrigation wells were sealed by
mid-1991. The river and groundwater monitoring programs are underway. The designs for
the treatment and extraction system are underway and are expected to be completed in 1992.
Entire Site: An investigation began in 1989 to evaluate the extent and nature of
the contamination on the entire site. The investigations include characterizations
of up to ten potential disposal areas, the wastewater treatment plant area, the
91,000 drum disposal area, off-site wetlands, the 100-acre production area, and other
treatment and disposal facilities. The investigation is expected to be completed in 1993, at
which time alternative cleanup options will be identified.
Source Control: The first two long-term remedial phases will be completed
before contamination source control measures are considered. A work plan will be
prepared for this phase if the EPA determines that additional measures are
needed to clean up the site. Field work is ongoing in the source areas.
March 1992 40 CIBA-GEIGY CORP.
-------
Site Facts: In 1980, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
issued an Administrative Order forcing the potentially responsible parties to remove the
drums and initiate groundwater monitoring at the site. In 1984, the EPA informed the parties
potentially responsible for the site contamination of their responsibility for cleaning up the
site. After negotiations with the EPA, the parties agreed to fund the investigative work
carried out to determine the nature and the extent of the contamination.
Environmental Progress
The remedy for groundwater cleanup has been selected, and contaminated irrigation wells
have been sealed. Bench- and pilot-scale treatability studies have been completed to
determine appropriate groundwater cleanup technologies and the design of the groundwater
treatment and extraction systems are underway. The EPA has determined that the
Ciba-Geigy Corp. site no longer poses an immediate threat to the surrounding community or
the environment while further investigations into final remedies for the remaining portions of
the site are underway.
Site Repository
Ocean County Public Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
CIBA-GEIGY CORP.
41
March 1992
-------
Other Names:
Cinnaminson Township Landfill
CINNAMINSON
TOWNSHIP (BLOC1^ 7i(W* x anna.*^ Township
GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATIO
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980785638
Site Description
The Cinnaminson Township (Block 702) Groundwater Contamination site covers approximately 400
acres in Cinnaminson and Delran Townships in Burlington County, New Jersey. The site includes
properties bounded by Union Landing Road, U.S. Route 130, River Road, and Taylors Lane. The
Delaware River is located approximately 5,000 feet to the northwest, and U.S. Route 130 passes
about 2,000 feet southwest of the site. The site consists of a landfill, residential properties, and light
to heavy industrial properties. A number of the industrial facilities have petroleum underground
storage tanks. Unlined slurry pits and cooling ponds are located on one industrial property The
landfill portion of the site originally began as a sand and gravel mining pit. During the late 1950s,
municipal solid wastes were deposited in the completed unlined mining pits, while the mining
operations continued in other parts of the property. Mining operations were terminated in the late
1960s. After the mines were closed, large amounts of refuse and solid waste were deposited in the
pits. Municipal and institutional wastes, bulky wastes, vegetable and food processing wastes, and
industrial wastes, including hazardous substances, were deposited in two areas of the landfill. In the
1970s, the landfill was cited several times by the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy for violations of landfill regulations. In 1979, analysis revealed that the
groundwater underneath and adjacent to the landfill was contaminated. The landfill ceased
operations in 1980. A clay cap was installed over the landfill to restrict rain and surface water from
infiltrating into the wastes, thus reducing the amount of leachate entering the groundwater. The
underlying aquifer is a source of drinking water for people living around the site. There are both
public and private water supply wells within 1 mile of the site. Approximately 55,000 people live
within a 3-mile radius of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
42 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Arsenic and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including chloroform, benzene,
and vinyl chloride have been detected in the groundwater. Ingestion of the
contaminated groundwater may pose a heath threat.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the groundwater
and an evaluation of the clay cap.
Response Action Status
Groundwater: The EPA completed a study in 1990 of the extent and the nature of the
contamination in the groundwater at the site. The investigation included the installation
of monitoring wells and sampling of the groundwater around the site to locate the areas
of greatest contamination. The hydrogeology at the site is complicated by the presence of
discontinuous clay layers, called lenses. These clay lenses tend to create a shallow aquifer above the
deep aquifer. Samples of surface water, sediment, and air were taken during the investigation and
found to be within acceptable levels. The selected remedy includes pumping groundwater from both
the deep and shallow aquifers, treating it to remove contamination, and reinjecting the treated
groundwater into the deep aquifer. The design of these technologies is expected to begin in 1992.
Clay Cap: An evaluation of the effectiveness of the clay cap, installed over the landfill
when it ceased operations in 1980, is planned to begin in 1995 and expected to be
completed in 1996.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and determined that
no immediate actions were required at the Cinnaminson Township (Block 702) Groundwater
Contamination site while cleanup actions are being planned and additional evaluations take place.
Site Repository
Cinnaminson Township Municipal Building, 1621 Riverton Road, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP (BLOCK 702) 43 March 1992
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
-------
COMBE FILL
NORTH
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980530596
Site Description
Between 1966 and 1978, the 65-acre Combe Fill North Landfill site operated as a sanitary
municipal landfill, accepting municipal and industrial wastes and minimal amounts of dry
sewage sludge. In 1978, the landfill was purchased by Combe Fill Corporation (CFC). In
1979, groundwater was found to be contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
as were private residential wells downslope from the site. VOCs were also found in the air.
Runoff flowed across the surface of the landfill and drained into the creeks bordering the
site. The landfill was not properly closed when CFC went bankrupt in 1981. The area
surrounding the site is primarily wooded, with small residential areas, farms, and light
industry. Some land is used for farming purposes. Approximately 10,000 people rely on
groundwater supplied from wells.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Air is contaminated with methane and VOCs emanating from the landfill.
Groundwater is contaminated with various VOCs as well as phthalates, zinc, and
cyanide. Runoff from the site that drained into nearby creeks may have
contaminated the surface water and fish. Those who drink contaminated
groundwater may be at risk. In addition, individuals who come in direct contact
with uncovered wastes may suffer adverse health effects.
44 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1986, the EPA and the State selected a remedy to clean up the
site that includes: grading and compacting the waste disposal area; covering the
landfill with a clay or a synthetic material to prevent surface water and rainwater
from coming into contact with the buried waste; installing a system of ditches and metal pipes
to collect drainage from the site; installing a ventilation system for the methane gas; and
fencing the site. The State has completed the majority of the cleanup activities. Once all of
the remaining details of cleanup activities are completed, expected in 1992, the State plans to
monitor the groundwater and air to ensure the effectiveness of the cleanup.
Environmental Progress
The EPA conducted preliminary investigations of the Combe Fill North Landfill and
determined that no emergency response actions are needed. Long-term cleanup activities are
underway at the site and are expected to be completed in 1992.
Site Repository
Morris County Free Library, 30 East Hanover Avenue, Whippany, NJ 07891
COMBE FILL NORTH LANDFILL
45
March 1992
-------
COMBE FILL
SOUTH LANDFI
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD094966611
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Morris County
Chester and Washington Townships
The Combe Fill South Landfill consists of three separate fill areas comprising 65 acres on a
115-acre parcel of land between Chester and Washington Townships. The site operated as a
municipal landfill from the 1940s until 1981 and was licensed to accept municipal and
non-hazardous industrial wastes, sewage sludge, septic tank wastes, chemicals, and waste oils.
In 1978, Combe Fill Corporation (CFC) bought the landfill. While under CFC management,
procedures at the landfill violated many of the New Jersey solid waste administrative codes.
CFC went bankrupt in 1981, before the landfill was properly closed. A citizen's group, one of
two formed by residents who were concerned over disposal practices at the site, sampled the
groundwater, leachate, and surface water and found them to be contaminated. Testing
indicated that the fill material consists mainly of highly decomposed rubbish, and that no hot
spots or localized sources of hazardous substances exist. Contaminants have seeped into the
aquifer beneath the site. The State provided bottled water to residents affected by
contaminated groundwater. Leachate, groundwater, and surface runoff form the headwaters
of Trout Brook, which flows through Hacklebarney State Park. The area surrounding the site
is semi-rural. A large portion of a nearby wetlands area was cleared to construct the landfill.
Trout Brook is used for fishing and recreational activities. Approximately 170 people live
within 1/2 mile of the landfill. Most of the residents use private wells as their source of
drinking water. Vegetable and grain crops, orchards, and horse farms are located near the
site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
46
March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
HGJ
Air sampling showed the presence of methane and other gases and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) such as benzene, ethylbenzene, and toluene. Groundwater is
contaminated with VOCs and arsenic. Soil contains pesticides including aldrin and
dieldrin. Contaminated surface runoff, which contains VOCs, pesticides, and
metals, drains into Trout Brook. Contaminants may accumulate in the trout and
could pose a health hazard to those who eat them. Although residents have been
provided with an alternate water supply, individuals who continue to drink the
contaminated well water may suffer adverse health effects. In addition, those who
come in contact with or accidentally ingest contaminated soil may be at risk.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: an immediate action and a long-term remedial
phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: The State provided bottled water to residents affected by
groundwater contamination and fenced the site to prevent access.
Entire Site: In 1986, the EPA and the State selected a remedy that includes:
covering the landfill with clay or a synthetic material to prevent surface water and
rainwater from coming into contact with the buried wastes; installing a system to
collect the landfill gases; pumping the shallow groundwater and leachate and treating it
before discharging it into Trout Brook; installing controls to accommodate stormwater runoff
and seasonal increases in rain; and performing an additional study to determine if the deep
aquifer needs treatment. The State of New Jersey completed the design of the technical
specifications to clean up the site in 1992. In addition, the design of an alternate water supply
system has been initiated and installation will begin in 1993 for residents who are or may be
threatened by the contaminated groundwater plume. Final cleanup actions are expected to
begin in late 1992. When all cleanup activities are completed, the State will monitor the site
to ensure the cleanup has been effective.
Environmental Progress
The site has been fenced and residents have been provided with bottled water, reducing the
potential for exposure to contaminants at the Combe Hill South Landfill site while the design
of final cleanup actions is completed.
COMBE FILL SOUTH LANDFILL 47 March 1992
-------
Site Repository
Washington Township Library, 146 Schooleys Mountain Road, Long Valley, NJ 07853
March 1992
48
COMBE FILL SOUTH LANDFILL
-------
COOPER ROAD
SITE
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980761381
EPA REGION 2
Camden County
Voorhees Township
Site Description
The Cooper Road site covers an area of less than 100 square feet in Voorhees Township.
The site consists of an old borrow pit that had been excavated for fill material. In 1982,
several dozen 1- to 2-ounce glass vials containing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were
discovered at the site. Some of the vials were broken, but most were still intact. The State
requested that the property owners remove the vials, but the owners did not comply. The
property was sold in 1983, and under State supervision, the new owners removed the vials,
excavated 6 inches of contaminated soil, and placed the vials and soil in a federally approved
hazardous waste facility. The EPA deleted the Cooper Road site from the NPL in 1989,
when it was determined that the site no longer posed a threat to the public or the
environment. The site lies in an area that has undergone recent residential development.
Approximately 1,400 people live within 3 miles of the site. The nearest residence is located
300 feet from the site, and the nearest private well is 500 feet away. New residential
developments within the site area are being placed on the municipal water service.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Deleted Date: 02/22/89
Threats and Contaminants
Soil was contaminated with VOCs and heavy metals, including lead and arsenic.
49
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site was addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire
site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The significant risks and threats to the community and the
environment were eliminated in 1987 after the owners, under State supervision,
removed the glass vials and excavated the contaminated soils. The vials and soil
were disposed of in a federally approved hazardous waste facility.
Environmental Progress
The contaminated soils and materials have been removed from the Cooper Road site,
thereby eliminating any potential site-related risks to the community and the environment.
The EPA deleted the site from the NPL in 1989.
Site Repository
Information is no longer available.
March 1992
50
COOPER ROAD SITE
-------
COSDEN CHEM
COATINGS
CORPORATION
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD000565531
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Burlington County
Beverly
Other Names:
Cosden Paint Company
Cosden Industrial Coatings
Corporation
Moleta-Cosden Industrial Coatings
The 6 1/2-acre Cosden Chemical Coatings Corporation site operated as a production facility
under several names from the early 1940s until 1989. The facility produced coatings for
industrial applications that involved the use of solvents, and stored them on site in drums.
Prior to 1974, solvents and wastes were recycled by a contractor who regularly removed the
drums. In 1974, the recycling ceased, and the drums accumulated on the site. The owner
abandoned the site in 1985. The site first came to the attention of the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) following a grass fire at the
facility. An inspection by the NJDEPE in 1980 revealed surface spills and several hundred
unsecured drums stored on site. The EPA conducted sampling in 1988 and found soil and
groundwater contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Approximately 700
people live within 1 mile of the site; the closest residence is 1/10 mile away. Approximately
69,000 people within 3 miles of the site depend on groundwater for their drinking water.
Three municipal wells are located within 1 mile of the site. The Delaware River is 4,000 feet
away and is used for recreational activities.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/25/87
Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
The soil and groundwater are contaminated with VOCs including toluene, xylene,
and ethyl benzene. Soil also is contaminated with heavy metals including
chromium, lead, zinc, and copper, as well as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
Individuals may be at risk through direct contact with contaminated soil or
accidental ingestion of contaminated groundwater or soil. Although private wells
were the source of drinking water in the past, all the homes in the area are now
connected to the municipal water supply.
51
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1985, the State secured the site by consolidating the
contents of the drums into dumpsters. The State then removed 540 drums of PCB
wastes and sent them to a federally approved incinerator for disposal. In 1987, the
State removed 43 drums of paint and paint sludges for incineration at a federally approved
facility. In 1989, the EPA constructed a fence to secure the site.
Entire Site: The EPA is conducting an investigation to define the contamination
at the site. Geophysical studies have been performed to identify the locations of
buried drums and underground storage tanks and to determine their contribution
to the contamination. The EPA is sampling the soil to measure the type, amount, and
location of contaminants. Nine wells have been installed to monitor groundwater and to
analyze the contaminants. Once these investigations are completed, scheduled for 1992,
alternatives for cleaning up the site will be recommended.
Site Facts: The State ordered Cosden Chemical Coatings Corporation to clean up the
on-site spills and to remove and dispose of the drums three different times (1981, 1984, and
1985). The company did not comply with any of the orders. The site was abandoned in 1985.
Environmental Progress
The removal of drums and installation of a fence have reduced the potential for exposure to
contaminants at the Cosden Chemical Coatings Corporation site while further studies on the
nature and extent of contamination are being completed.
Site Repository
Beverly City Hall Municipal Building, 446 Broad Street, Beverly, NJ 08010
March 1992 52 COSDEN CHEMICAL COATINGS CORPORATION
-------
CPS/MADISON
INDUSTRIES
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD002141190
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Middlesex County
Old Bridge Township
Other Names:
CPS Chemical
Old Bridge Chemical
The CPS/Madison Industries site consists of two adjacent manufacturing facilities located on
a 35-acre tract of land. CPS processes, treats, and stores organic chemicals used in the
production of water treatment agents, lubricants, oil field chemicals, and anti-corrosive
agents. The company generates spent halogenated solvents that are shipped off site for
disposal. The hazardous wastes are stored in tanks or containers, where some solvent
distillation occurs. Madison Industries produces zinc compounds for fertilizers,
Pharmaceuticals, and food additives. Since 1967, the two companies repeatedly have dumped
and discharged chemicals into the public sewer system as well as onto their respective
properties. Thirty-two municipal wells have been closed due to contamination. Both facilities
are still in operation and continue to handle hazardous materials on site. Approximately 1,000
people live within 1/2 mile of the site. Prickett's Brook and Pond have been contaminated,
but are not used for recreation or water supplies.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with various volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and
heavy metals including zinc and to a lesser extent cadmium, copper, and lead. The
sediments and surface water of Prickett's Pond are contaminated with zinc and
VOCs. Even though Prickett's Pond is not generally used for recreation, children
who play near it may suffer adverse health effects if they come in contact with or
ingest the water or sediments. Although the contaminated water wells have been
taken out of service, those who accidentally come in contact with or drink
contaminated groundwater may be at risk. In addition, the Perth Amboy wellfield
is downgradient of the site.
53
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on interim
groundwater actions and cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Interim Groundwater Actions: In early 1991, a groundwater pump and treat
system was installed as a temporary remedy to prevent contamination of the
nearby Perth Amboy wellfield while further studies are being completed. Soon
after the installation of the recovery system, benzene and dorobenzene appeared in Perth
Amboy Supply Well #6 (SW#6). In response to the contamination at SW#6, the EPA
installed additional monitoring wells immediately upgradient of the well and sampled the new
and existing monitoring wells. The results of that sampling indicated that the contamination
was deeper and closer to SW#6 than previously believed. The EPA and the State are
currently looking into options for protecting the well.
Entire Site: CPS and Madison Industries, under State supervision, have been
studying the type and extent of contamination at the site. Once further studies on
the groundwater, surface water, and sediment contamination are completed, the
EPA will review the recommended alternatives and will select the cleanup actions to be
implemented.
Site Facts: CPS and Madison Industries are performing hydrological contamination
investigations under a 1988 court order. Discussions are underway between the EPA and the
State to initiate studies to locate any remaining sources of contamination at the site. In
addition, Perth Amboy, in response to the initial contamination at SW#6, has taken the two
companies to court in an effort to use the existing court order to force them to implement a
wellhead protection program.
Environmental Progress
A temporary groundwater treatment system has been installed to contain the spread of
groundwater contamination and protect the Perth Amboy wellfields which provide the public
with their drinking water supply. The EPA and the State continue to monitor the drinking
water to ensure that the residents and the environment are protected while further
investigations leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies are taking place.
Site Repository
Old Bridge Public Library, Old Bridge Center, 516 Cottrell Road, Old Bridge, NJ 08857
March 1992 54 CPS/MADISON INDUSTRIES
-------
CURCIO SCR
METAL, INC.
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD011717584
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
Saddle Brook Township
The 1-acre Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc. (CSMI) site is an active scrap metal yard that contains
10,950 square feet of warehouse and office space. CSMI and Cirello Iron and Steel Company
(CISC) recycle scrap iron, copper, aluminum, and other ferrous and non-ferrous metals on
this active yard. In 1982, CSMI received shipments of 54 electrical transformers and, while
cutting the transformers, oil containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) spilled onto the
ground. The State became aware of the site in 1982 when a citizen became concerned over
CSMI's activities. The State found the soil and runoff from a drainage ditch to be
contaminated with PCBs. In 1985, the State discovered an oil spill that flowed to a pond
approximately 300 feet from the site and determined that CISC was responsible for the spill.
The company spilled about 200 to 300 gallons of hydraulic fluid on the site. Approximately
30,000 people depend on public wells within 3 miles of the site as their sole source of drinking
water. An estimated 1,000 to 3,000 people live within a 1-mile radius, with the closest
residence being 300 feet from the site. The site is located above the Brunswick formation,
one of the State's most important aquifers. Schroeders Brook is located nearby.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 01/22/87
Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and soil are contaminated with PCBs, heavy metals, and volatile
organic chemicals (VOCs). Surface water in a drainage ditch and in a nearby pond
may be contaminated with the same contaminants. Those who drink or come in
contact with PCB-contaminated water may be at risk. In addition, the polluted
surface water in the drainage ditch and pond may pose a health threat if the water
is touched or accidentally ingested.
55
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the soil
and cleanup of groundwater and surface water.
Response Action Status
Soil: In mid-1991, excavation and off-site incineration of approximately 1,800
cubic yards of contaminated soil was selected to clean up the soil. The parties
potentially responsible for site contamination are currently conducting the design
of the remedy, scheduled to be completed in 1993, and will perform the cleanup at the site
under EPA monitoring.
Groundwater and Surface Water: In 1992, the potentially responsible parties
are scheduled to start the second phase of a study to determine the nature and
extent of groundwater and surface water contamination and to identify cleanup
alternatives. The study is expected to be completed in the spring of 1993.
Site Facts: In 1988, the EPA, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, CSMI, and
CISC signed an Administrative Order on Consent in which the companies agreed to conduct
a study to measure the extent of the contamination at the site. The EPA issued a Unilateral
Administrative Order in 1989 requiring the potentially responsible parties to refrain from
taking any actions that might interfere with the EPA's investigation or cleanup of the site.
The respondents are also required to implement provisions for eliminating any future releases
of hazardous substances at the site. The EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order in
1991 requiring all potentially responsible parties to design and construct the cleanup remedy.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and
determined that no immediate actions were required at the Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc. site
while further studies are being completed and cleanup activities are being designed.
Site Repository
Saddle Brook Free Public Library, 340 Mayhill Street, Saddle Brook, NJ 07662
March 1992 56 CURCIO SCRAP METAL, INC.
-------
D'IMPERIO
PROPERTY ^ A^ Hamilton Township
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Atlantic County
_._.._. i__^*^>~«« o _> / Other Names:
NEW JERSEY L . /^W WotelOennis
EPAID#NJD980529416
The D'Imperio Property site comprises approximately 26 acres, of which 1 1/2 acres were
used as an unauthorized dump in the mid-1970's. The disposal area consists mainly of
partially buried and ruptured metal drums. Numerous drums containing metals and various
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including solvents were dumped there. The groundwater
is contaminated and the contaminant plume has been detected in two aquifers. The site is
located in a semi-rural area, with most of the developed areas more than 1/2 mile from the
property. Approximately 6,000 people within 3 miles of the site use groundwater for drinking
water. Twenty private wells are located within 1 mile, with the closest well 300 feet
upgradient of the site. The site is within the New Jersey Pineland Reserve. Babcock Swamp
wetlands, which are drained by Babcock Creek, are approximately 2,000 feet to the
southwest.
-... _, ...... „, . v . , . ,, . .. , NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Federal actions. Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Surface and sub-surface soils are contaminated with VOCs, base neutral/acid
extractables, and metals. The groundwater is contaminated with VOCs. Those
who drink the contaminated groundwater from private wells may be at risk. In
addition, individuals may be at risk from direct contact with or accidental ingestion
of contaminated soils. The New Jersey Pineland Reserve and the Babcock Swamp
wetlands also are potentially threatened.
57 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an immediate action and a long-term remedial
phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: In 1982, the EPA constructed a fence to prevent people
from entering the site and coming into contact with hazardous substances.
Entire Site: In 1985, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site that
includes: excavating and transporting 3,900 cubic yards of contaminated waste, soil,
and drums to a federally approved facility; constructing a cover made of clay or
synthetic material to prevent rainwater from spreading buried wastes; and pumping and
treating the groundwater to remove the contaminants and then discharging the clean water
back into the aquifers. In 1987, the EPA removed 82 buried drums and 3,900 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and disposed of them in a federally approved facility. The EPA currently is
designing the technical specifications for the groundwater pump and treat system. Once the
design phase is completed, scheduled for 1992, the groundwater cleanup will begin. Upon
completion of the groundwater pump and treat action, the EPA will design the cap for the
waste area.
Environmental Progress
By securing the site with a fence and removing the contaminated soil and drums, the EPA
has reduced the potential for exposure to contaminated materials at the D'Imperio Property
site while further cleanup activities are taking place.
Site Repository
Office of the Mayor, Hamilton Township, 2 Cape May Avenue, Mays Landing, NJ 08330
March 1992
58
D'IMPERIO PROPERTY
-------
DAYCO CORP./LEj.*> EPAMSN 2
CARPENTER CO, /^*>^ Wharton Borough
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD002168748
Site Description
The 14 1/2-acre Dayco Corp./L.E. Carpenter Co. site operated as a vinyl wall covering
manufacturing facility. During the operations, solid and liquid wastes were disposed of in
unlined on-site lagoons, approximately 20 feet from the Rockaway River. Although
manufacturing is no longer taking place on site, the site is still active as a warehouse and
office facility. The site is located in the flood plain of the Rockaway River and is above an
aquifer that provides water for both Wharton and Dover. The site also borders residences
and other industrial facilities. Approximately 27,000 people live within a 3-mile radius of the
site. The nearest residence is 150 feet from the site, and two of Wharton's public supply wells
are approximately 2,600 feet from the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 04/10/85
Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, sediments, and soil are contaminated with various volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), such as xylene and ethyl benzene, and with phthalate
esters. The contaminated groundwater, soil, and sediments may adversely affect
public health if accidentally swallowed or touched. Site-related contaminants have
reached the Rockaway River and have been found in river sediment samples.
59 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1982, Dayco Corp./L.E. Carpenter Co. removed approximately
4,000 cubic yards of soil from the property. Storage tanks at the facility also have
been cleaned out. A program to pump floating organics from the water table is
underway. More than 5,000 gallons of organic liquids have been pumped from above the
water table and removed from the site.
Entire Site: In 1986, the company took responsibility for carrying out a
comprehensive investigation of the site to evaluate the nature and extent of the
contamination. Once the study is completed, scheduled for late 1992, alternative
cleanup actions will be evaluated by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy and the EPA.
Site Facts: Under an Administrative Order signed by L.E. Carpenter Co. and the State of
New Jersey in 1986, L.E. Carpenter Co. is conducting the site investigation and will also be
performing the required site cleanup activities.
Environmental Progress
By removing contaminated soil and organic liquids and cleaning storage tanks, the parties
potentially responsible for contamination at the Dayco Corp./L.E. Carpenter Co. site have
reduced the potential for exposure to contaminated materials while studies leading to th'e
selection of final cleanup remedies are taking place.
Site Repository
Wharton Public Library, 1519 South Main Street, Wharton, NJ 07885
March 1992 60 DAYCO CORP./L.E. CARPENTER CO.
-------
DE REWAL
CHEMICAL
COMPANY
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980761373
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Hunterdon County
Kingwood Township
From 1970 to 1973, the 3 3/4-acre De Rewal Chemical Company site manufactured a textile
preservative and agricultural fungicide and served as a warehouse for the storage and resale
of chemicals. Chemicals handled included a range of metals, acid solutions, and fertilizer
nutrients and associated compounds. Numerous spills were reported in 1973, including one
incident in which a tank truck containing a highly acidic chromium solution was allowed to
drain onto the soil and eventually to the Delaware River. The area formerly occupied by the
company was sold in 1979 and has been used since then for a small business and private
residence. The site is located within the flood plain of the river, which is used for recreation.
Groundwater is the source of drinking water for the area. Investigations of the groundwater
indicated the shallow water-bearing zone is contaminated with heavy metals and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). Several residences are located north and south of the site. The
population of the Kingwood Township is approximately 3,000.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
Threats and Contaminants
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Testing of the bedrock aquifer showed the presence of VOCs such as
trichloroethane and tetrachloroethane, as well as the heavy metal cadmium, but
not at levels exceeding safety standards. The shallow water-bearing zone also
contains metals and VOCs. The soil is contaminated with heavy metals including
chromium, cadmium, copper, and lead, as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs) and VOCs. Contaminated groundwater and the soil could pose a health
hazard to individuals through direct contact or accidental ingestion.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
61
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: Based on studies of the contamination at the site, the EPA selected
a remedy to clean up the site which includes: excavation of contaminated soil;
on-site thermal treatment of VOC-contaminated soil; on-site solidification and
stabilization of the thermally treated soil and the remaining metal-contaminated soil;
extraction of shallow contaminated groundwater with on-site storage, and off-site disposal at
an approved industrial wastewater treatment facility; provision of a treatment system for the
on-site residential well; monitoring to ensure the remedy has been effective; and
establishment of deed restrictions. The results from monitoring of the bedrock aquifer after
the completion of the cleanup will determine if there is a need for further action. In 1989,
the EPA began designing technical specifications for the cleanup. A treatment system was
provided for the on-site residential well in 1990. The design of the remaining cleanup
activities is scheduled for completion late in 1993.
Environmental Progress
Installation of a treatment system for the on-site residential well has reduced the threat of
exposure to contaminants at the De Rewal Chemical Company site while the remaining
cleanup activities are being designed.
Site Repository
Hunterdon County Library, Route 12, Flemington, NJ 08822
March 1992
62
DE REWAL CHEMICAL COMPANY
-------
DELILAH ROAD \-fcs EPA REGION 2
UCLILMn nWMI-r - ^>U Atlantic County
NEW JERSEY \ J$* Egg Harbor Township
EPA ID# NJD980529002
Site Description
The 40-acre Delilah Road site is one of a complex of four landfills formerly operated by
Charles Price. The site was a sand and gravel pit used for sand mining operations and was
then converted to a solid waste disposal site, accepting municipal and construction wastes and
some hazardous wastes. A permit subsequently was issued for the disposal of non-hazardous
municipal and solid waste only. The site accepted municipal and household wastes from 1974
to 1980, but records indicate that drummed flammable wastes and sludges containing
trichloroethylene (TCE) and lead were dumped at the site. A notice of violation was issued
by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy in 1979. Landfill
operations ended in 1980. Numerous incidents of illegal dumping were reported after the site
was closed. Sampling by the EPA uncovered groundwater contamination in 1982. Jarrets Run,
a creek that flows intermittently into Absecon Creek, is located 1,000 feet north of the
landfill. Approximately 3,500 people live within a 3-mile radius of the site. A New Jersey
Water Company public water supply well is located less than a mile from the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 09/08/83
Federal and State actions. Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals including arsenic are
present in the soil. The groundwater is contaminated with low levels of heavy
metals and VOCs. Contaminants in the groundwater are not conclusively linked to
the landfill. VOCs from the landfill may be evaporating into the air. The
contaminated groundwater and soil may pose a health hazard to individuals if
accidentally swallowed or touched. Access to the site is unrestricted.
63 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Bottled water was provided to the nearby residences until the
State completed the installation of a municipal water supply system. Hookups
have been provided to the residences and businesses around the perimeter of the
landfill that previously relied on private wells for their water supply.
Entire Site: The State completed an investigation of the site in 1990 to determine
the extent and nature of the contamination. The results of the investigation were
used in selecting the cleanup actions to be implemented. The chosen cleanup
remedies include placing an impermeable cap over the landfill; installing a surface water
control system; installing a landfill gas collection and treatment system; implementing an air
and groundwater monitoring program; and fencing and issuing deed restrictions to limit access
to the site. Cleanup activities will begin once the design of the remedy is completed.
Environmental Progress
By providing an alternative water supply to residents affected by site contamination, the
potential for exposure to contamination at the Delilah Road site has been reduced, while
design of the remedies and cleanup actions are being planned.
Site Repository
Atlantic County Library, Egg Harbor Branch, Swift Drive, Bargaintown, NJ 08232
March 1992
64
DELILAH ROAD
-------
A
Ct
EPA REGION 2
Ocean County
X-RAY COMPAiav; ^^ *T/ Bayville
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD046644407
Site Description
The 5-acre Denzer & Schafer X-Ray Company site is involved in the reclamation of silver
from both microfilm and X-ray negatives. Contamination occurred due to such practices as
the discharge of the stripping solutions to the sanitary septic system. Microfilm processing
waste from a nearby facility also may have been disposed of in the site's septic tanks. This
means of disposal was used from 1974 through 1981. Other identified sources of
contamination included the stockpiling of shredded and stripped film and, prior to 1974, the
incineration of the film waste. The sanitary septic tank currently is filled with sand. Waste
materials that are generated now are disposed of off site. The underlying Cohansey Aquifer is
contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatiles, and metals. The
aquifer supplies drinking water to residential and public water supply wells serving
approximately 25,500 area residents. The site is near the coastline and close to Potters Creek
and Barnegat Bay.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Federal and State actions. Final Date: Q9/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with heavy metals including arsenic, chromium,
lead, and mercury, as well as VOCs including chloroform and toluene. Carbon
disulfide and vinyl acetate were detected in some sediment samples. Cadmium was
the only chemical detected at a significant concentration when sampling was
conducted at 13 soil boring locations. Potential risks exist for those who drink
groundwater from contaminated wells.
65 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1987, the State initiated a site investigation to determine the
extent of groundwater contamination and other contaminants of concern. The
study, scheduled to be completed in 1993, will identify the extent of contamination
at the site and also will identify alternative technologies for the cleanup.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and
determined that no immediate actions were required at the Denzer & Schafer X-Ray
Company site while further investigations leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies
are taking place.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
March 1992
66
DENZER & SCHAFER X-RAY COMPANY
-------
DIAMOND ALKALI &W EP***™" 2
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980528996 _ other Names:
Diamond Shamrock Site
80 Lister Avenue Property
Site Description
The Diamond Alkali Co. owned and operated a pesticides manufacturing facility in Newark,
New Jersey. The site, which covers over 3 acres and is adjacent to the Passaic River, is
composed of a number of properties used for chemical manufacturing by numerous
companies for more than 100 years. The mid-1940s marked the beginning of the
manufacturing operations related to the current site conditions, including the production of
DDT and phenoxy herbicides. The Diamond Alkali Co. (later known as Diamond Shamrock
Chemicals Company), acquired the property in 1951 and produced various chemicals and
pesticides until 1969, when the company ceased operations. Subsequent owners used the
property until 1983, when sampling at the site revealed high levels of dioxin. The area is both
densely populated and heavily industrialized. The municipal water is drawn from the Wanaque
Reservoir, roughly 35 miles from the site. Approximately 40,000 people live within 1 mile of
the site; 367,000 people reside within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Final Date: 09/21/84
Dioxin has been detected in on-site monitoring wells. Other contaminants detected
in groundwater include herbicides and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as
benzene, acetone, and toluene. Dioxin and pesticides have been found in the on-
site soils. Sediments in the Passaic River and nearby waterways contain dioxin.
Workers involved in the cleanup and area residents, including children, may be at
risk if they come in contact with contaminated soils. Individuals accidentally
ingesting contaminated soil or surface water also may be at risk, as may those
using contaminated groundwater for other uses. The Passaic River and fish and
shellfish from the river may be threatened by runoff from the site.
67 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on interim and long-term remedies for the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The dioxin discovery led to one of the properties being
secured with a fence. All exposed soils were covered with geofabric to prevent
potential migration of contamination. At the other properties,
dioxin-contaminated soils and debris were removed by excavation, vacuuming, and other
means, and were transferred to 120 Lister Ave. for storage. This work was initiated by the
EPA and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) in
1983 and taken over by the Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company under State
Administrative Consent Orders.
Interim Remedy: In 1987, the EPA selected an interim remedy that entails
construction of a slurry wall around the two properties, installation of a cap, and
extraction and treatment of groundwater to reduce the migration of
contaminants. Under a Consent Decree with the EPA and the State of New Jersey, a party
potentially responsible for the contamination is currently designing these cleanup remedies.
Long-term Remedy: Under a 1989 Consent decree, the interim remedy will be
periodically reevaluated. This remedy will be modified if additional actions are
deemed necessary to ensure the effectiveness and permanence of the cleanup.
Site Facts: In 1984, the State and Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company entered into two
Administrative Orders on Consent, one for the completion of the investigation and immediate
response work at 80 Lister Avenue, and the second for investigations and immediate response
work at other properties. A Consent Decree was filed in 1989 between Chemical Land
Holdings and the EPA requiring the potentially responsible parties to undertake final cleanup
activities at the site.
Environmental Progress
Securing the site, covering the soils, and removing the contaminated soil and debris have
reduced the potential for individuals to have contact with the contaminated materials while
design of the cleanup actions are underway at the Diamond Alkali Co. site.
March 1992 68 DIAMOND ALKALI CO.
-------
Site Repository
Newark Public Library, 5 Washington Street, Newark, NJ 07101
DIAMOND ALKALI CO.
69
March 1992
-------
DOVER MUNICIPAL/*^ EPAMoSN 2
WELL 4 /^W r£, Dover
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980654131
Site Description
The Township of Dover Water Commission in Morris County owns Municipal Well 4. This
well provided drinking water for the municipality until it was taken out of service in 1980
because of contaminated groundwater. The contaminants, first detected in 1980, are
halogenated organic solvents. The source of the contamination is unknown. The New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) is investigating the site.
Approximately 32,000 people live within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 12/30/82
Federal and State actions. Fina, Date. 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Halogenated organic solvents including trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, and
dichloroethylene have been detected in the groundwater. The contaminated
groundwater could pose a health hazard to individuals if it is ingested.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase directed at cleanup of the
entire site.
70 March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The parties potentially responsible for the contamination conducted
studies at their own facilities to determine if they are a source for the
contamination of the Dover Municipal Well 4. The State currently is conducting
investigations at the site to evaluate the nature and extent of the contamination. When these
studies are completed in 1993, final cleanup actions will be recommended and remedy
selections will be made.
Site Facts: The NJDEPE identified two parties potentially responsible for the
contamination. An Administrative Consent Order was signed between NJDEPE and the two
parties; however, the NJDEPE broke off negotiations with the potentially responsible parties
after they refused to pay for investigative work performed by the State to evaluate the level
of contamination.
Environmental Progress
After adding the Dover Municipal Well 4 site to the NPL, the EPA performed a preliminary
evaluation and determined that the site does not pose an immediate threat to the public,
provided they do not drink or use water from this well. Further investigations leading to the
discovery of the source of the contamination and the selection of final cleanup remedies
currently are underway.
Site Repository
Dover Free Library, 32 East Clinton Street, Dover, NJ 07801
DOVER MUNICIPAL WELL 4
71
March 1992
-------
ELLIS
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
directed at cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1983, the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy removed some drums and contaminated soil from the site.
In 1987, the buildings on site were demolished because they were structurally
unsafe. The area affected by acids was neutralized by the EPA. At the same time, some
drums on site were removed, and the rest were stored on site. In 1990, the last of the drums
and containerized materials were removed.
Entire Site: An investigation of the site begun by the State in 1987 was
completed in early 1992. After the study was completed, the State issued a
proposed remedy for the Ellis Property site which entails excavation and off-site
disposal of contaminated soils and extraction and treatment of contaminated groundwater.
After a public comment period, the EPA will select a final remedy, expected in late 1992.
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated drums, soils, and materials, as well as the other actions
described above, has made the Ellis Property site safer while the investigations leading to the
selection of a final cleanup remedy are taking place.
Site Repository
Evesham Library, Tritown Plaza, Route 70, Marlton, NJ 08053
ELLIS PROPERTY
73
March 1992
-------
FVOR PHII I IPQ SX/V EPA REGION 2
tVUK rniLLirO^ . '/£V Middlesex County
LEASING ^ rt />~^ Old Bridge Township
NEW JERSEY / TrW Other Names:
IMCVV UCnoCI ^ _,/\ | Phillips Leasing
EPA ID# NJD980654222 / 5 y< \ // N. America Metals
EPL Industries
Site Description
The Evor Phillips Leasing (EPL) site covers 6 acres in Old Bridge Township. A State
investigation conducted in 1982 found between 4,000 and 5,000 drums containing explosive
chemicals buried at the site. EPL has no equipment for containing the drums of waste, and
the area is unlined, enabling contaminants to migrate through the soil, groundwater, and
surface water. The area surrounding the site is used for hunting and fishing. However, there
has been no evidence that game or fish have become contaminated.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including dichloroethane and
trichloroethylene (TCE) and heavy metals such as copper, nickel, and zinc have
contaminated the groundwater. The soil is contaminated with VOCs and
phthalates, a plastics by-product. Since access to the EPL site is possible,
trespassers, on-site workers, and children may be exposed to potential health
hazards. Direct contact with the soil and groundwater could cause health problems.
Accidentally ingesting contaminated soil or drinking the contaminated groundwater
could pose a health threat. Municipal well data confirm the presence of
site-related contaminants in the groundwater. All well water samples exceed the
EPA's and the State of New Jersey's water quality criteria for heavy metals. It is
possible that leaching of on-site contaminants into the underlying aquifer is
occurring and causing contamination of drinking water wells.
74 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: initial actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the on-site groundwater and buried drums and cleanup of the regional
groundwater and on-site soils.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1983, the State excavated 30 to 40 drums and removed them
from the site; 4,000 to 5,000 drums remain buried on site.
On-Site Groundwater and Buried Drums: The State completed assessing the
sources of contamination, the on-site buried drums, and determined the nature
and extent of the contamination of the on-site groundwater in 1992. The EPA is
currently reviewing the cleanup alternatives and will select the best remedy for the site. The
final cleanup remedy is expected to be determined by late 1992.
Regional Groundwater and On-Site Soils: An investigation is expected to
begin in 1993 to explore the nature and extent of regional groundwater and on-
site soil contamination. The study will define the contaminants of concern and
will recommend effective alternatives for final cleanup. Once completed, the EPA will
evaluate the study findings and select a final remedy for regional groundwater and on-site soil
cleanup.
Site Facts: Under an Administrative Order on Consent, signed by the State and several
potentially responsible parties, the parties agreed to contribute funds for a thorough
investigation of the site.
Environmental Progress
The EPA has determined that while site studies are taking place the Evor Phillips Leasing
site does not pose an immediate threat to the surrounding community or the environment.
Until final cleanup is complete, the EPA will ensure the safety of the public and environment,
and will continue to monitor the site to ensure that the wastes at the site do not migrate to
surrounding areas.
Site Repository
Old Bridge Public Library, Old Bridge Center, 516 Cottrell Road, Old Bridge, NJ 08857
EVOR PHILLIPS LEASING 75 March 1992
-------
EWAN PROPE
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980761365
EPA REGION 2
Burlington County
Wallingford Way, Shamong Township
Other Names:
Shamong Township Drum Dump
Site Description
The Ewan Property consists of 43 heavily wooded acres in Shamong Township. The site,
which includes a contaminated groundwater plume, is located within the Central Pine Barrens
portion of the New Jersey Pinelands. Two areas of industrial waste disposal were suspected
during initial site studies. Area A, consisting of 9 acres, is the primary area of concern. Site
investigations revealed that during the early to mid-1970s, from 500 to 8,000 drums containing
hazardous industrial wastes were emptied or buried in trenches, and the trenches
subsequently were backfilled with soil. Soil and groundwater sampling indicates the presence
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatiles, and metals. It is estimated that Area A
has 4,500 cubic yards of highly contaminated waste material and 29,500 cubic yards of
moderately contaminated soil. The property is surrounded by forest, agricultural land, and
residential areas. Private residences are provided domestic water from wells as close as a mile
downstream from the site. Approximately 330 people live in the area and are served by
individual domestic water wells. The groundwater is used not only for domestic purposes, but
also for irrigation of croplands. Adjacent to the site is an intermittent stream. The New
Jersey Pinelands is a major groundwater recharge area.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
HAJ
A plume of contaminated groundwater is contaminated with VOCs including
acetone and benzene and the heavy metals chromium and aluminum. Two aquifers
below the site are hydraulically linked. The groundwater under the site flows in a
southerly direction. Monitoring wells both on and off site detected contaminants in
the groundwater. Soil also is contaminated with VOCs and heavy metals. Drinking
the contaminated groundwater could pose a health threat. The New Jersey
Pinelands, a sensitive ecosystem and major groundwater recharge area, is
threatened by site contaminants.
76
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases directed at removal of the buried drums and cleanup of the soil and groundwater.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: At the EPA's direction, a potentially responsible party
installed a security fence in 1988 to keep trespassers and children away from
contaminants at the site.
Buried Drums: In 1988, the EPA selected the cleanup methods to be used to
remove contaminated materials and buried drums from the site. These methods
include: construction of an area for waste identification, grouping, and storage;
excavation of wastes; collection and grouping of waste materials with off-site incineration of
all appropriate wastes; temporary on-site storage and assessment of non-incinerable wastes to
determine proper treatment/disposal methods; and monitoring of air and groundwater during
the cleanup activities. The potentially responsible parties began the design of the technical
specifications for this work in 1989. Once the design phase is completed, scheduled for late
1993, cleanup work will begin.
Soil and Groundwater: In 1989, the cleanup plan for contaminated soil and
groundwater was chosen by the EPA. Soil cleanup, which includes excavation of
contaminated soil and treatment to remove contaminants by solvent extraction and
soil washing, will be followed by placement of the treated soils back onto the site. For the
contaminated groundwater, the chosen remedy is to collect, treat, and reinject the treated
groundwater into the aquifer. After completion of these measures, the cleanup plan calls for
restoration of the disposal areas and appropriate environmental monitoring.
Site Facts: The EPA has identified and notified approximately 30 potentially responsible
parties. Seventeen parties have been ordered to remove contaminated materials and buried
drums.
Environmental Progress
Installation of a security fence has reduced the potential for contact with contaminants while
the chosen remedies are being designed. The EPA has determined that the Ewan Property
site does not pose a threat to the surrounding community or the environment while it awaits
final cleanup actions.
Site Repository
Shamong Township Clerk, 60 Willow Grove Road, Vincetown, NJ 08088
EWAN PROPERTY 77 March 1992
-------
FEDERAL AVI
ADMINISTRAT
TECHNICAL
CENTER (USDO
NEW JERSEY
EPAID* NJ9690510020
EPA REGION 2
Atlantic County
8 miles northwest of Atlantic City
Site Description
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Technical Center (USDOT) covers an area of
approximately 5,000 acres on a site 8 miles northwest of Atlantic City. The site borders the
Garden State Parkway in southeastern New Jersey. Installations on the site include the
Atlantic City International Airport, a New Jersey Air National Guard Station, and extensive
FAA facilities. Activities at the site started in 1942 with the construction of a Naval air base.
In late 1958, the FAA, then known as the Airways Modernization Board, took over the
operation and has used the facility as an airport and aviation safety research center. The
FAA has identified over 20 areas of concern at the Technical Center, including five training
areas, underground storage tanks, landfills, and a jet fuel misting area. Atlantic City's
municipal water supply is provided by nine groundwater supply wells located just north of the
Upper Atlantic City Reservoir on FAA property, as well as water drawn directly from the
reservoir. The reservoirs are fed by the North and South Branches of Doughty's Mill Stream,
which cross portions of the Technical Center grounds. An estimated 37,000 permanent
residents and 113,00 visitors during peak seasons obtain drinking water from the Atlantic City
wells and reservoirs.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed
through Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 07/14/89
Final Date: 08/30/90
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including tetrachloroethene, dichloroethene,
and benzene are present in groundwater above New Jersey safety standards.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and VOCs were detected in soils in drum storage
areas and at the location of two underground waste oil tanks. Although the
Atlantic City municipal wells are not contaminated, a potential health threat exists
if pollutants migrate to the wells. Those who accidentally ingest contaminated soil
may suffer adverse health effects.
78
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in five stages: initial actions and four long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the jet fuel farm, the salvage yard, the fire training area, and other
areas.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1989 and 1990, PCB-contaminated soil and a contaminated
cement pad were removed from the Transformer Storage Area. During these two
actions, approximately 62 tons of soil and concrete debris were excavated and
Jet Fuel Farm: It is estimated that there are 360,000 gallons of floating
petroleum product and 33,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil in this area. In
1989, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the jet fuel in the soil and
groundwater including free product extraction, in-situ bioremediation, and soil venting. The
design of the technical specifications of the remedy is planned for completion in 1992.
Salvage Yard: Storage of scrap materials and drummed hazardous wastes has
contaminated the soil and groundwater in this area. Under EPA monitoring, the
FAA will remove contaminated soil to an off-site rotary kiln for incineration to
destroy contaminants. Groundwater will be extracted and cleaned with an air stripping
technology. Construction of a groundwater pumping and treatment system began in late 1991
and the system has been in operation since early 1992.
Fire Training Area: Test burning and extinguishing of fuel fires have
contaminated soil and groundwater in this area. The investigation into the nature
and extent of contamination at the fire training area was completed in 1991. The
EPA expects to select a remedy for the fire training area in late 1992.
Other Areas: Investigations to determine the nature and extent of contamination
are near completion at several other areas at the FAA Technical Center site.
Based on the results of investigations at other areas, additional cleanup phases, as
well as specific cleanup alternatives, will be recommended.
Site Facts: An Interagency Agreement between the EPA and the FAA is expected to be
signed in 1992.
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 79 March 1992
TECHNICAL CENTER (USDOT)
-------
Environmental Progress
Initial actions have removed PCB-contaminated soils and limited the potential for exposure to
hazardous wastes. Remedy designs for groundwater and additional soil contamination cleanup
are nearing completion while investigations are being concluded at the remaining areas of
concern at the Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center (USDOT) site.
Site Repository
Atlantic County Library, Mays Landing Branch, 2 South Farragut Avenue,
Mays Landing, NJ, 08330
March 1992
80
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
TECHNICAL CENTER (USDOT)
-------
FAIR LAWN
WELL FIELD
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980654107
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
Fair Lawn
Site Description
The Fair Lawn Well Field site contains three municipal wells that supply drinking water to
the 32,000 residents of Fair Lawn. In 1978, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were
detected in municipal supply wells located within and adjacent to the Fair Lawn Industrial
Park. These wells were removed from the municipal system shortly after contamination was
discovered. Fisher Scientific Company and Sandvik, Inc. have been identified as contributing
sources to groundwater contamination. The site is bounded on three sides by the remaining
industries of Fair Lawn Industrial Park, and there are several residences within 300 feet of
the site. There are no private wells in the vicinity of the site. However, there are public water
supply wells nearby.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
VOCs were detected in groundwater contributing to the public drinking water
supply. Soils on the site also are contaminated with VOCs including benzene and
toluene. Few potential threats to individuals exist, since the contaminated wells
were taken out of service. However, accidentally ingesting or touching
contaminated groundwater or soil poses health threats.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the Sandvik Facility and the Fisher Scientific Facility.
81
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1984, the potentially responsible parties removed
contaminated soil from the site and, in 1987, installed air strippers to treat the
well fields.
Sandvik Facility: Under State monitoring, Sandvik, Inc. conducted a limited
investigation of its facility. The New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy and the EPA are negotiating with Sandvik, Inc. to conduct
additional investigations at its facility.
Fisher Scientific Facility: Fisher Scientific Company conducted a limited
investigation of its facility, under monitoring by the State. The company has
installed a trench to collect contaminated groundwater for on-site treatment and
discharge to a publicly owned water treatment works; however, groundwater is not currently
being collected or treated due to permitting issues.
Site Facts: In 1984, an Administrative Order was signed by Sandvik, Inc. and the State for
the company to conduct a site investigation. An Administrative Order also was signed in 1986
by Fisher Scientific's parent company, Allied Signal, and the State for investigations,
contaminated soil removal activities, and construction of a groundwater collection system.
Environmental Progress
The immediate actions described above have reduced the potential for exposure to
contaminated groundwater and soil at the Fair Lawn Well Field site while further
investigations and cleanup activities are taking place. The wells currently are being treated to
remove contaminants and to ensure that the public is provided with a safe drinking water
supply.
Site Repository
Maurice M. Pine Free Public Library, 10-01 Fair Lawn Avenue, Fair Lawn, NJ 07410
March 1992
82
FAIR LAWN WELL FIELD
-------
LANDFILL
KimJtf I CO OCX
NEW JERSE
EPAID# NJD980529143
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
eurtington County
NEW JERSEY /^mjff ^ °£™
The Florence Land Recontouring (FLR) Landfill is a 60-acre site that contains a 29-acre
landfill, two lagoons, a pond, and two tanks. The FLR Landfill was operated as a municipal
solid waste disposal facility from 1973 until late 1981. The State licensed the landfill to accept
sanitary and non-chemical industrial wastes. In 1975, the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) investigated chemical waste disposal at the
site and found that 95 tons of hazardous waste consisting of phthalates, heavy metals, and
vinyl chloride monomers were illegally disposed of at the site. Elevated levels of hazardous
substances were discovered in soils and groundwater within the landfill. However, results of
sampling and analysis of off-site wells over the past nine years have shown that drinking
water quality is within health standards. Approximately 4,500 people live within a 3-mile
radius of the site. The area surrounding the site is primarily mixed agriculture and residential.
The site is bordered by land purchased by Burlington County for a new 600-acre waste
management facility and by Assiscunk Creek, a tributary to the Delaware River, which is used
for recreation and irrigation.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions. Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and soils are contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) including methylene chloride and vinyl chloride and the heavy metals
arsenic, chromium, and lead. The leachate is contaminated with VOCs and
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Residents in the area using the
groundwater for domestic purposes could be exposed should the contaminants
migrate from the landfill into the wells. Exposure through direct contact appears
minimal, since the contamination is below the landfill cap. Cleanup workers and
those who trespass on the landfill may be at risk, especially during activities which
may disturb the landfill cap. The workers may be exposed to contaminants through
direct contact with the soils and groundwater, inhalation of VOCs and other gases
typically produced in landfills by biological degradation of refuse, or accidental
ingestion of soil or groundwater.
83 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: an initial action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Action: In 1982, a clay cover was placed on the landfill during closure. A
leachate collection system was installed, and the resulting leachate was placed into
two lagoons constructed on another section of the property. The leachate lagoons
were surrounded by a 5-foot-high fence with barbed wire around the top. Carbon adsorption
filters were placed on top of the six leachate collection system manholes to collect the VOCs
and to control odors.
Entire Site: In 1986, the EPA chose the following methods to clean up the site:
construction of a synthetic membrane and clay composite cap, a perimeter
soil/Bentonite slurry wall, an upstream groundwater interceptor system, and a new
stormwater management system; leachate treatment and disposal at a municipal wastewater
treatment facility; removal and disposal of lagoon liquids and sediments and other surface
debris; construction of a partial fence with warning signs; and supplemental sampling of
groundwater, surface water, and sediments during the design phase. The technical
specifications and design for the cleanup were completed in early 1991. The installation of the
security fence has been completed; remaining cleanup activities are underway and are
scheduled for completion in late 1993.
Site Facts: In January 1979, a Consent Order to alleviate and control further contamination
was issued by the New Jersey Superior Court. Subsequent enforcement action by the
NJDEPE was required when the terms of the Consent Order were not followed. In July 1981,
Florence Land Recontouring, Inc. submitted a final closure plan, and operations terminated
in November 1981.
Environmental Progress
By installing a fence around the site and installing carbon and absorption filters, the threat to
the surrounding community from site contamination has been reduced while cleanup activities
are being completed.
Site Repository
Burlington County Library,, Main Library, West Woodlane Road, Mount Holly, NJ 08060
March 1992 84 FLORENCE LAND RECONTOURING LANDFILL
-------
FORT DIX <\£* \ EPA REGION 2
runi UIA 5yi \ BurlingtonCounty
(LAND FILL Ol"r^*r^ \ Pemberton
MC\A/ IPDQPV \^^X / X ] Other Names:
IM C VV J Clf OC T ^m^a \ j u-s- ArmV Training Center (USATC)
EPA ID# NJ2210020275 ^(^^ H ^\ I and Fort Dix
Site Description
The U. S. Army Training Center and Fort Dix encompasses approximately 33,000 acres. The
126-acre Fort Dix (Landfill Site) operated as a sanitary landfill from 1950 until 1984. The
U.S. Army's Fort Dix Military Reservation and McGuire Air Force Base used the landfill.
Wastes from these bases were buried in a series of parallel trenches, which were covered with
native soil that had been removed when the trench was excavated. Some of the types of
waste disposed of in the landfill included sludges, waste paints and thinners, and pesticides. In
addition to the landfill, the Army identified 21 past disposal and spill areas on the reservation
which were possibly contaminated. Fourteen of these areas have been determined to merit
further investigation. Cannon Run and an unnamed stream are located near the landfill and
flow into Rancocas Creek. A hardwood swamp also is located near the landfill. The site is
surrounded by woods and dense vegetation. Wooded areas around the landfill are open to
the public during the hunting season. Unauthorized recreational activities such as dirt biking
occur near the site. An estimated 5,000 people live in military housing about 4,000 feet
upstream of the landfill. Approximately 500 people live in Pemberton Township, which is
4,000 feet from the landfill, and 7,300 residents are served by domestic wells within 3 miles of
the landfill.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Federal actions. Final Date: 07/22/87
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and surface water are contaminated with various volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) as well as heavy metals including manganese, lead, and
cadmium. Potential threats to health include drinking and touching contaminated
groundwater and the hardwood swamp surface water. However, no potable water
supply wells are threatened by the groundwater contamination. There is also a
potential health risk associated with eating contaminated plants and animals from
the swamp.
85 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the
landfill and cleanup of the disposal and spill areas.
Response Action Status
Landfill: In 1991, the Army and the EPA selected a remedy for the landfill area
which entails capping the southernmost 50 acres and monitoring for 30 years. The
design of the cap is underway and construction is scheduled to begin in late 1992.
Disposal and Spill Areas: In addition to the landfill, the Army has identified 21
past disposal and spill areas potentially contaminated with hazardous wastes. A
preliminary study recommended that the EPA conduct a study of 14 additional
areas of the site to determine the nature and extent of contamination. The subsequent
investigation and recommendations for final cleanup alternatives are expected to be
completed in 1994.
Site Facts: Fort Dix is participating in the Installation Restoration Program (IRP), a
specially funded program established by the Department of Defense (DOD) in 1978 to
identify, investigate, and control the migration of hazardous contaminants at military and
other DOD facilities. In 1985, the EPA, the State, and the Army signed an Administrative
Order on Consent for closure of the landfill. The DOD agreed to investigate the
contamination at the site, define the contaminants, and recommend alternatives for final
cleanup. In 1991, the Army also signed an Interagency Agreement with the EPA which entails
both study and closure of the landfill and the investigation and cleanup of the disposal and
spill areas.
Environmental Progress
Upon listing the site on the NPL, the EPA performed an initial assessment and determined
that the Fort Dix (Landfill Site), including disposal and spill areas, does not pose an
immediate threat to nearby residents or the environment while studies and design activities
leading to final cleanup are underway.
Site Repository
Fort Dix Environmental, Natural Resources Division, Building 5512, Texas Avenue,
Fort Dix, NJ 08640
March 1992 86 FORT DIX (LANDFILL SITE)
-------
FRIED INDUST
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD041828906
EPA REGION 2
Middlesex County
East Brunswick Township
Site Description
Fried Industries manufactured floor finishing products, detergent solutions, and other cleaning
products on this site in East Brunswick Township. Also, site facilities had been leased at times
to a manufacturer of automotive antifreeze. The site property occupies 26 acres and contains
a pond, a marsh area, several separate wetland areas, and a building complex. In 1983, the
EPA found that hazardous wastes were improperly stored on site and that the soil was
contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and copper. In a limited excavation,
the EPA found deteriorated buried drums. There is a potential for the site to contaminate
the groundwater and surface water. In 1985, Phillip Fried, president of the firm, notified the
Middlesex County Department of Health (MCDH) that the facility's holding tank was full
and in danger of overflowing. At the request of the MCDH, the EPA conducted a site visit.
Samples of the process waste tank and the septic holding tank on site indicated the presence
of hydrocarbons. There was evidence that the tanks already had overflowed to a drainage
ditch entering Bog Brook and Mill Pond, which flows to Lawrence Brook, a tributary of the
Raritan River. Also, seepage into the ground threatened the underlying aquifer.
Approximately 25,000 people live within a 3/4-mile radius.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and municipal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with VOCs including chloroform, benzene, and
vinyl chloride. The soil is contaminated with VOCs and heavy metals including
mercury and copper. People may be at risk from direct contact with contaminated
soil, or accidental ingestion of contaminated groundwater or soil. Also, there is
concern that Bog Brook, Mill Pond, Lawrence Brook, and the adjoining wetlands
may be contaminated.
87
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Approximately 7,000 gallons of process and septic wastes
were pumped from the tanks and transported for treatment to the Middlesex
County Utilities Authority and Perk Chemical Company. The Town of East
Brunswick provided hookups to a public water supply to residences with contaminated wells.
The EPA approved an immediate action in 1989 to install a security fence and remove more
than 1,200 drums and containers as well as laboratory bottles from the site. The EPA
completed this action in early 1992.
Entire Site: The EPA completed an investigation to determine the nature and
extent of the contamination including: a soil gas survey to delineate contaminant
plume and to locate areas of elevated contamination; a geophysical survey to
further define any contaminant plume, as well as the locations of buried drums and fill areas;
a sampling of surface and buried drums, repacking of leaking drums, and placement of all
drums in a secured area on site; a survey and sampling of selected off-site residential wells to
delineate any subsurface migration of site-related contaminants; a delineation of Fried
Industries property boundaries and on-site wetlands; and an air monitoring program to
determine potential contaminant migration off the Fried Industries site. The EPA determined
that additional studies are needed to further characterize the site. The studies are underway.
Upon completion of site studies, scheduled for early 1992, cleanup alternatives will be
proposed.
Site Facts: The site owner was informed that the EPA would conduct an investigation on
site to determine the extent and the nature of the site contamination. Under a 1985 Consent
Decree, the owner suspended further manufacturing and production operations on site. The
site owner was asked to leave the site premises and did so in 1989.
Environmental Progress
The removal of hazardous liquids, the provision of an uncontaminated public water supply,
and securing the site have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous substances at the
Fried Industries site while studies leading to the selection of final cleanup activities are taking
place.
March 1992 88 FRIED INDUSTRIES
-------
Site Repository
East Brunswick Library, 2 Jean Walling Civic Center Drive, East Brunswick, NJ 08816
FRIED INDUSTRIES
89
March 1992
-------
FRIEDMAN
N E W J E RS E Y ^/ " v ^ Avp upper Freehold T°wnsr.iP
EPA ID# NJD980532832 ^5^-^ £^ Other Names:
Thiokol Corp Site
Site Description
The 3-acre Friedman Property is an open, vacant lot with scrub vegetation. Drums and liquids
were dumped into a ditch at the site in the late 1950s and 1960s. Groundwater underlying
this abandoned site was suspected to contain a number of contaminants. The Friedman
Property was one of four priority NPL sites within a 2-mile radius. The site is in a rural area
with scattered residences, commercial facilities, and several trailer parks, all dependent on
local groundwater as the source of drinking water. The site is bordered by an unnamed
tributary to Lahaway Creek, a single-family residential property, and routes 537 and 539.
Site Responsibility: This site was addressed through
Federal and State actions.
Final Date. 09/08/83
Deleted Date: 03/30/86
Threats and Contaminants
Although groundwater samples showed very low levels of creosotes and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), a groundwater plume could not be defined. After
extensive investigations, the EPA has determined that the low levels of compounds
in the groundwater do not pose a threat to human health or the environment.
Cleanup Approach
This site was addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
90 March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1985, the EPA determined the Friedman Property site did not
require cleanup actions to address the low-level residual contamination detected at
the site. The EPA, however, has required annual monitoring of on-site wells for a
five-year period to ensure that groundwater remains within safe levels. The New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) performed the monitoring.
The sampling results provided to the EPA showed that groundwater continues to be safe. The
EPA recommended that the State request local authorities to place deed restrictions on
future uses of the property. This request is under discussion by the State.
Site Facts: In 1982, the EPA asked the potentially responsible party, the Morton Thiokol
Corporation, to carry out an investigation to determine the nature and the extent of the
contamination at the site. In 1983, the company submitted a proposal to the EPA for the
investigation. The proposal was rejected by the EPA, and the NJDEPE decided to carry out
the investigation. The result of the State's investigations led to the EPA's decision to delete
the site from the NPL in 1986.
Environmental Progress
After conducting extensive site investigations, the EPA has determined that the low levels of
contaminants do not pose threats to nearby residents at the Friedman Property site or the
environment and has deleted the site from the NPL.
Site Repository
Information is no longer available.
FRIEDMAN PROPERTY
91
March 1992
-------
GARDEN STATE/\r^ Ept,f!E?ION2
/ ^^x /V^ Atlantic County
CLEANERS ^^S^ Minoto,a
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD053280160
Site Description
Garden State Cleaners Co. (GSC) is a commercial dry cleaning facility that has been
operating since 1966. It is located approximately 500 feet south of the South Jersey Clothing
Company site, which also is on the NPL. In an investigation of GSC in 1984, the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) detected high levels of the
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE)
in soil below a steam discharge pipe. Off-site monitoring wells located adjacent to and
downgradient of GSC and South Jersey Clothing Company contain large quantities of VOCs,
which has forced some residential private wells to close and the Borough to construct a new
municipal water supply system. Approximately 6,000 people live in this mixed residential and
commercial area. They obtain drinking water and irrigate 3,800 acres of farmland from wells
within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions. Final Date: 03/31/89
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and soil are contaminated with VOCs, including primarily PCE
and TCE. Use of contaminated groundwater for domestic purposes and
agricultural irrigation may pose a health threat as a result of drinking or touching
contaminants.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
92 March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1991, the EPA chose a remedy for the site which entails in-situ
treatment of contaminated soil using a vapor extraction process, extraction of
VOC-contaminated groundwater, and treatment of the contaminated groundwater
using air stripping and carbon adsorption technologies, reinjection of the treated water into
the aquifer, and long-term monitoring. The design of these actions is underway and cleanup is
expected to begin in late 1994.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and
determined that no immediate actions were required at the Garden State Cleaners Co. site
while design of the final cleanup remedies is taking place.
Site Repository
Buena Borough Municipal Building, 616 Central Avenue, Minotola, NJ 08341
GARDEN STATE CLEANERS CO.
93
March 1992
-------
GEMS LANDFIL
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980529192
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Camden County
Gloucester Township
Other Names:
Gems/Amadei
Amadei Landfill
Gloucester Environmental
Manufacturing Services Landfill
The approximately 60-acre GEMS Landfill site has been owned by Gloucester Township from
the late 1950s to the present. During this time, the landfill has been operated by various
parties as a disposal site for solid, liquid, and hazardous wastes and substances. Records
indicate that a variety of industrial wastes including asbestos, solvents, and other materials
were disposed of at the GEMS site between 1970 and 1979. In 1980, sludge from the City of
Philadelphia's northeast wastewater treatment facility was disposed of at the site. Analyses of
the sludge revealed the presence of pesticides. The State closed the landfill in 1980. Scattered
industrial and recreational areas are adjacent to the site. The closest residences are
approximately 300 feet from the landfill. Approximately 6,000 people live within a mile of the
site, and 38,000 people live within a 3-mile radius. Holly Run and Briar Lake are wetland
areas near the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 07/23/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
zra
Groundwater, surface water, and sediments are contaminated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals including arsenic, barium, and lead. VOCs
and heavy metals also have been detected in off-site surface soils. Leachate from
the site contains VOCs, heavy metals, and trace amounts of pesticides including
DDE, DDD, and DDT. This leachate is migrating into, and constitutes a
significant percent of, the flow of the nearby Holly Run. Individuals may be at risk
by inhaling site contaminants, or touching or ingesting contaminated groundwater,
surface water, or soil.
94
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1983, the EPA removed debris from the site,
constructed a fence, and took other measures to prevent residents from coming in
contact with wastes in the area.
Entire Site: The EPA selected the following remedy to clean up the site:
constructing a landfill cap and regrading existing landfill side slopes; installing an
active gas collection and treatment system, a groundwaterAeachate treatment
system, and surface water controls; implementing a monitoring program; and relocating and
isolating Holly Run and installing limited runoff controls. In addition, the potentially affected
homes will be connected to the existing public water supply system. The potentially
responsible parties have begun final cleanup activities at the site; completion of the first
phase of the cleanup, installation of the gas collection and treatment system, is scheduled for
mid-1992. The engineering designs for the groundwater/leachate treatment system are
underway and construction is expected to begin in 1993.
Site Facts: In 1981, a suit was instituted by the State to compel compliance with operation
and closure regulations. Complex litigation involved the Township, the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE), the New Jersey Board of
Public Utilities, and a number of potentially responsible generators and transporters. The
EPA sent Notice Letters in 1983 and 1985 to the parties potentially responsible for site
contamination to provide them the opportunity to perform cleanup actions. In 1987, the EPA
sent Notice Letters to over 120 potentially responsible parties to provide them the
opportunity to implement or fund the cleanup actions. In 1988, NJDEPE issued a Directive
and Notice to Insurers to 131 respondents and 71 insurance companies directing them to
proceed with the cleanup. As a result of this directive and an Administrative Order issued
simultaneously by the EPA, the potentially responsible parties have undertaken the first
phase of cleanup activities.
Environmental Progress
The removal of debris, construction of a fence, and the ongoing long-term cleanup activities
described above have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the
GEMS Landfill site while cleanup activities are being completed.
GEMS LANDFILL 95 March 1992
-------
Site Repository
Gloucester Township Library, 1650 Blackwood/Clementon Road, Blackwood, NJ 08012
March 1992
96
GEMS LANDFILL
-------
GLEN RIDGE
RADIUM SITE
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980785646
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Essex County
Glen Ridge
The 90-acre Glen Ridge Radium Site includes 306 properties on residential land. The soil at
the site is contaminated with radioactive waste materials suspected to have originated from
nearby radium processing facilities that operated in the 1920s. Subsequently, houses were
constructed on or near the radium waste disposal areas. Some of the radium-contaminated
soil was used as fill in the low-lying areas, and some was mixed with cement for sidewalks and
foundations. More than 300,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil are scattered on public and
private properties within portions of three communities. In 1983, the State identified a
number of homes with high levels of radon gas and radon decay products, as well as excessive
levels of indoor and outdoor gamma radiation. This site is similar to the nearby
Montclair/West Orange Radium site, which also contains radium-contaminated soils from the
same sources. The cleanup plan addresses both sites. Approximately 300 homes were
identified as being affected by radium-contaminated soil, radon, or gamma radiation.
Approximately 41,000 people live within 1 mile of the site, and 288,500 live within 3 miles.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 02/14/85
Threats and Contaminants
The soil is contaminated with radium. Radium decays to radon gas, which is
emitted into the air. Some properties on the site are contaminated with radium
and exhibit excessive levels of radon gas and gamma radiation. People who are
exposed to the radium, radon, and radon decay products may suffer from high
rates of cancer. Accidental ingestion of soil may cause adverse health effects.
97
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: emergency actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the soil and structures, the groundwater, and the remaining
properties.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1983, the EPA installed temporary radon ventilation
systems and gamma ray shielding in some of the affected houses. The EPA has
since replaced the original radon ventilation system with a sub-slab
depressurization system. The gamma radiation shielding remains in place.
Soil and Structures: In 1989, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the soil
and structures, which includes: excavating approximately 50,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and debris at the most extensively contaminated properties and
disposing of them in a licensed facility; installing and maintaining indoor engineering controls
at less contaminated properties; monitoring the site to ensure the effectiveness of the
remedy; and continuing alternative treatment studies for future actions at the site. The EPA
is designing the technical specifications to clean up the soil and structures on the site. As
portions of the design are completed, the cleanup will begin in a phased manner. The first
cleanup actions began in 1990. The engineering designs have been completed for the majority
of extensively contaminated properties. Cleanup has been completed on several homes at the
Montclair/West Orange site.
Groundwater: The EPA is conducting a study to determine whether
contaminants from the soil have entered the groundwater. This investigation is
scheduled for completion in 1993.
Remaining Properties: In 1990, the EPA selected a remedy for the remaining
properties, as well as public access areas and streets. The remedy includes
excavation and off-site disposal of all radium-contaminated material from public
and private properties; environmental monitoring, as required, to ensure the effectiveness of
the remedy; and the continuation of treatment technology studies to reduce the volume of
radium-contaminated material for off-site disposal. Cleanup work is scheduled to begin in late
1992.
Site Facts: The Glen Ridge Radium Site and the Montclair/West Orange Radium site are
being investigated simultaneously. The cleanup remedies will address both areas.
March 1992 98 GLEN RIDGE RADIUM SITE
-------
Environmental Progress
By providing air treatment systems to reduce excessive levels of radon and lead shielding to
protect affected residents from exposure to high levels of gamma radiation, the EPA has
reduced the potential for exposure to radioactive substances at the Glen Ridge Radium Site
while further studies and cleanup activities are taking place.
Site Repository
Glen Ridge Public Library, 240 Ridgewood Avenue, Glen Ridge, NJ 07028
GLEN RIDGE RADIUM SITE
99
March 1992
-------
GLOBAL SANITARY/)^ EP±?EGCION 2
\ y/ T~l / Middlesex County
LANDFILL ( /£? OIdBridge
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD063160667
Site Description
The 60-acre Global Sanitary Landfill site was licensed by the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) to accept non-hazardous waste. The landfill
borders Cheesquake Creek Tidal Marsh on three sides. In 1984, after heavy rains, two
consecutive high tides occurred in the wetlands, and a portion of the southern side of the
landfill collapsed and slid into the adjoining wetlands. As a result, the State closed the landfill.
In 1984, the State detected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) seeping from the site into the
wetlands. Allegations that drums containing paint thinner and various solvents were buried in
the landfill from 1968 to 1977 were confirmed in 1988. Groundwater immediately underneath
the site has become contaminated by pollutants leaching from the landfill. The Sayreville
Water Company has five water supply wells within a mile of the site. Approximately 86,000
people depend on wells within 3 miles as their sole source of drinking water. The water
supplies for Sayreville, Lawrence Harbor, South Amboy, and Perth Amboy are threatened.
Raritan Bay is located 2 miles from the site and is used for recreational activities.
Commercial fishing is conducted in the area.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
ffl
An aquifer underneath the site is contaminated; however, the extent of the
contamination has not yet been fully identified. The leachate seeping from the
landfill into the wetlands contains VOCs including methylene chloride, chloroform,
trichloroethylene, and benzene. VOCs have seeped from the landfill into the
Cheesquake Creek Tidal Marsh. The contaminants may have a harmful effect on
the wetlands and wildlife inhabiting the wetlands area. People may be at risk from
accidental ingestion of contaminated groundwater.
100 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on closure of the
landfill and cleanup of the groundwater, surface water, and the surrounding wetlands.
Response Action Status
Closure Of the Landfill: In 1991, NJDEPE completed a study of the various
methods for closing the landfill. Based on this study, the EPA selected a multi-
layer, hazardous waste cap and leachate collection system as the remedy. Design
of this remedy is scheduled to begin in late 1992.
Groundwater, Surface Water, and Surrounding Wetlands: In 1990, the
State began investigations into the extent of the contamination in the Cheesquake
Creek Tidal Marsh and the related aquifer. Once the investigations are completed,
scheduled for 1994, final cleanup technologies will be selected.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA and the NJDEPE performed preliminary
investigations and determined that no immediate actions were required at the Global Sanitary
Landfill site while further studies are being conducted and the cleanup activities are being
designed.
Site Repository
Sayreville Public Library, 1050 Washington Road, Parlin, NJ 08859v
GLOBAL SANITARY LANDFILL
101
March 1992
-------
GOOSE FARM
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980530109
EPA REGION 2
Ocean County
Plumsted Township
Site Description
The 1 1/2-acre Goose Farm site was used as a hazardous waste disposal area from the
mid-1940s to the mid-1970s by a manufacturer of polysulfide rubber and solid rocket fuel
propellant. The majority of wastes were dumped into a pit dug through fine sand. Waste
chemicals from laboratories, drums, and bulk liquids were dumped into the pit. In 1980, the
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) found that a
contaminant plume that originated in the waste pit area had migrated north in the
groundwater toward a nearby stream. Soil also was found to contain volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs). This site is within 2 miles of three other NPL sites: Hopkins Farm, Pijack Farm, and
Spence Farm. Approximately 10 residences are located within 2,000 feet of the Goose Farm
site. An unnamed stream on the site flows into Lahaway Creek, a tributary of the Delaware
River, which is used for recreational activities. The site is adjacent to a forest.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with VOCs and SVOCs. Soils heavily contaminated
with VOCs, PCBs, phenols, arsenic, and zinc were excavated from the waste pit;
however, residual contamination remains. Surface soils are now clean. The
unnamed stream that flows into Lahaway Creek is contaminated with methylene
chloride, benzene, and toluene. Leachate from the waste pit contained various
VOCs; however, the drums were removed and there is no longer any leachate
from the pit. Although surface water is not used as a source of drinking water, it is
used for irrigation of food crops. Contaminants may accumulate in the food and
pose a health hazard if eaten. The surface water is used for recreational purposes
and may be harmful if accidentally swallowed. Wildlife in the area may be affected
by the pollutants. People who touch or ingest the contaminated groundwater may
suffer adverse health effects.
102
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1980, the EPA and the State installed a groundwater
recovery and treatment system. In addition, approximately 5,000 containers
containing 9,000 gallons of bulked liquids were removed from the waste pit and
disposed of off site in a federally approved facility. About 3,500 tons of heavily contaminated
soil and 12 drums of PCB waste also were disposed of off site.
Entire Site: In 1985, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site. The
selected remedy includes: recovery and treatment of contaminated groundwater,
soil flushing with the treated groundwater, evaluation of the need to cap the site,
and additional testing of soils for PCB contamination. In 1989, Morton-Thiokol excavated
PCB-contaminated soil from the pit and regraded the area. The company has conducted a
field investigation for the technical design of the groundwater flushing system cleanup. Once
the design of this remedy is completed, scheduled for 1992, remaining cleanup activities will
begin.
Site Facts: In 1988, the potentially responsible party, Morton-Thiokol, agreed to clean up
the site under a Consent Decree with the EPA, NJDEPE, and the U.S. Department of
Justice.
Environmental Progress
Removing the liquid and solid hazardous wastes and installing a groundwater treatment
system have greatly reduced the potential for exposure to contaminants at the Goose Farm
site while final cleanup activities are taking place.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
GOOSE FARM 103 March 1992
-------
HELEN KRAMER/^1 EP*RfG'°!!2
Y\ *-i Gloucester County
LANDFILL
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1985, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site which
includes: constructing a trench to collect the leachate seeps from the landfill;
collecting and treating the groundwater and leachate from the trench; covering the
landfill with a multi-layer cap to prevent rain water from spreading the buried contaminants
and to limit escaping gas vapors; constructing a slurry wall encompassing the landfill to
prevent groundwater from moving into the contaminated area; installing a gas collection and
treatment system; constructing a fence around the site; draining, excavating, and filling the
leachate ponds and lagoons; controlling surface water movement on the site; and monitoring
the site to ensure the cleanup measures are effective. Cleanup work began in early 1992. The
cleanup of the lagoons, construction of both the leachate treatment facility and the gas
treatment facility, installation of a fence around the site, and the implementation of surface
water controls have been completed. The construction of the landfill cap, the slurry wall and
the leachate collection trench is scheduled for completion in late 1992.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and
determined that there were no immediate threats to public health or the environment while
ongoing cleanup activities are being completed at the Helen Kramer Landfill site.
Site Repository
Gloucester County Library, Main Library, 200 Holly Dell Drive, Sewell, NJ 08080
HELEN KRAMER LANDFILL 105 March 1992
-------
HERCULES, INC
(GIBBSTOWN P
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD002349058
EPA REGION 2
Gloucester County
Gibbstown
Other Names:
Higgins Plant
Site Description
The 350-acre Hercules, Inc. (Gibbstown Plant) site operates as an organic hydroxide/peroxide
manufacturing facility. An unlined solid waste disposal area on site was used by Hercules
from 1952 to 1974, and by DuPont prior to 1952. The companies disposed of solvents, acids,
and waste oils in two unlined disposal pits. In 1980, the U.S. Geological Survey conducted
tests of the aquifer beneath the site. The groundwater was found to be contaminated with
volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Hercules is located in an undeveloped area on the banks
of the Delaware River. Approximately 13,000 people live within a 3-mile radius of the site.
Area residents are served by municipal water wells. Cronmell Creek runs through the site and
discharges into the Delaware River.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
LffiJ
In some areas of the site, groundwater was found to be contaminated with
benzene and phenols. Lead also was detected in the groundwater. Soil was found
to be contaminated with VOCs and heavy metals including lead. Area residents are
supplied with water by municipal water wells that are not contaminated. However,
if the contamination in the aquifer migrates, these wells may be threatened. People
who touch or accidentally ingest on-site hazardous wastes or contaminated soil may
be at risk. If pollutants leach from the disposal area into the surrounding wetlands
or Cronmell Creek, wildlife may be harmed.
106
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the solid
waste disposal area and cleanup of the process plant area.
Response Action Status
Solid Waste Disposal Area: Hercules, under State monitoring, is investigating
the extent of contamination in the solid waste disposal area. Eight monitoring wells
have been constructed in this area and three additional monitoring wells will be
constructed as part of this investigation. Once the investigation is completed, scheduled for
1993, measures to clean up the disposal area will be recommended.
Process Plant Area: Hercules, under State monitoring, is treating contaminated
groundwater and is further investigating the contamination in and around the
process plant area. Once the investigation is completed, scheduled for 1994,
measures will be recommended for cleanup of the process plant area.
Site Facts: An Administrative Order on Consent was issued by the State in 1986 to
Hercules, Inc. (Gibbstown Plant) to take responsibility for investigating the nature and extent
of site contamination and to evaluate cleanup alternatives for both areas.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations at the
Hercules, Inc. (Gibbstown Plant) site and determined that no immediate actions were
required while studies leading to the selection of final cleanup activities are taking place.
Site Repository
Greenwich Township Municipal Building, Broad and Walnut Streets, Gibbstown, NJ 08027
HERCULES, INC. (GIBBSTOWN PLANT) 107 March 1992
-------
HIGGINS DISPOS
NEW JERSEY < JWT^ North of Kingston
EPA ID#NJD0531 02232 / O&O Other Names:
Site Description
Laurel Avenue
The 38-acre Higgins Disposal site is located in a rural area on Laurel Avenue in Franklin
Township, New Jersey. From the 1950s to 1986, the site owner operated a waste disposal
business at the site utilizing an unpermitted landfill, waste transfer station, and compactor.
This same owner currently maintains his residence on the site as well as an equestrian facility
and a truck repair shop. In 1982, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy (NJDEPE) ordered the owner to cease acceptance and disposal of solid waste
and to remove the waste already at the site. In 1985, the Franklin Township Health
Department and the NJDEPE discovered volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in groundwater
samples from nine homeowner wells on Laurel Avenue. The site, possibly located
hydraulically upgradient of the homes, was cited as one of several potential sources of
groundwater contamination. As a result of the contaminants found in the homeowner wells,
the Laurel Avenue residences were designated an Interim Well Restriction Area by the
NJDEPE. The NJDEPE sent a directive to the site owner in 1987 to restrict site access, to
apply for an official groundwater permit from New Jersey that would require discharges to
groundwater to meet safety standards, and to start an interim groundwater monitoring
program. Through this groundwater monitoring program, on-site groundwater contamination
was discovered. Within a 3 mile radius of the site, approximately 10,643 people rely on
groundwater for their drinking water source. Two farms within a 3-mile radius of the site
grow food for human consumption. Neither of these farms use groundwater for irrigation.
The farms use water from ponds and a stream located more than 3 miles from the site. A
freshwater wetland is located 300 feet from the site. Two on-site ponds discharge into Dirty
Brook, which is a tributary of the Delaware/Raritan Canal and the Millstone River. Located
approximately 1500 feet west of the site, both ponds flow north, eventually discharging into
the Raritan Bay. Within 3 miles downstream from the site, the Delaware/Raritan Canal is
used for fishing, boating, and swimming. The North Brunswick Township Water Department
has a drinking water intake located on the canal 6 miles downstream from the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions. Final Date. 08/30/90
108 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, sediments, and soil are contaminated with various VOCs. In
addition, soil and sediment sampling by the EPA in 1990 and 1991 revealed the
presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in one area of the site. Because the
Delaware/Raritan Canal is used for recreation, individuals who touch or
accidentally ingest the water may be at risk. In addition, fish from the canal may
be harmful to public health if eaten. The soil on the site is permeable, which
makes it easy for contaminants to migrate. Coming in contact with or accidentally
ingesting the soil may pose a health hazard. The wetlands area is a habitat for nine
endangered species. Should pollutants seep into the wetlands, wildlife may suffer
adverse effects.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an initial action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Action: As a result of the detection of VOCs, use of wells that contain
pollutants have been restricted. Due to the elevated levels of PCBs in one area of
the site, the EPA plans to remove the contaminated soil in 1992.
Entire Site: The EPA will investigate the site to determine the nature and extent
of contamination at the site. Work plans for this site study are under review by the
EPA. Field work is expected to begin in 1992. The results of these studies will be
the basis for recommending measures to clean up the site. These recommendations are
expected in 1993.
Environmental Progress
The restrictions on the use of contaminated wells have reduced the threat of exposure to
contaminants from the Higgins Disposal site while further investigations are taking place.
Site Repository
Not established.
HIGGINS DISPOSAL 109 March 1992
-------
HIGGINS FARM^^yy EPSA RE,G'°" 2
/ rc^s^^ J-^7 Somerset County
NEW JERSEY } ,. \^trtL FranklinTownship
EPA ID#NJD981490261 / ^ C>^C/ Other Names:
Route 518
Site Description
The 74-acre Higgins Farm site consists of a former drum burial dump, located in the northern
part of the site, and a second area nearby where drums were uncovered during recent field
work. The dump once contained 50 drums. The New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) discovered the dump site in 1985 while conducting an
investigation after the Franklin Township Health Department reported chlorobenzene in a
nearby private well. The NJDEPE informed the farm's owner of State requirements relating
to the excavation of buried drums, which were subsequently removed in 1986. Before being
halted by the NJDEPE for conducting these activities without prior authorization, an
estimated 10 drums were removed, crushed, and placed in a roll-off container. After proper
authorization, the owner located approximately 50 drums by probing the ground with a
backhoe. During excavation activities, drums were punctured and their contents spilled onto
the ground. Fluids were pumped from a pit where contaminants were stored before being
transferred into a holding tank. Visually contaminated soils were placed in roll-off containers,
and approximately ten drums were overpacked. The NJDEPE sampled ten residential wells in
the vicinity of the site in 1986, three of which exhibited volatile organic compound (VOC)
contamination. In addition, a subsequent investigation found soil in the area of the excavation
pit to be contaminated with dioxins and pesticides. The nearest well is located 120 feet from
the drum burial dump.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 06/24/88
Federal and State actions. Final Date. 03/31/89
110 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
L\
Groundwater in private wells is contaminated with VOCs, while on-site soils are
contaminated with VOCs, pesticides, and dioxins. Possible health threats include
being exposed to contaminants through direct contact with site-related
contaminants. Area residents could be exposed to contaminants that have
accumulated in locally raised cattle. Residents, on-site workers, employees of the
farm, and trespassers could come into direct contact with contaminated soils.
Carter's Brook, lying 2,000 feet to the east of the site, occasionally is visited by
children. Because this brook lies downslope of the site, it is possible that
site-related contaminants could migrate into the water. Local residents use the
Millstone River and the Delaware/Raritan Canal, located 2 miles south of the site,
for such recreational purposes as fishing, boating, and swimming.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the entire site and provision of an alternate water supply.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA authorized the delivery of bottled water to
nearby residents in 1987. The NJDEPE installed carbon filter units on the wells
of the affected residents' homes in 1989. At that time, the EPA discontinued
bottled water delivery. At the NJDEPE's request, the EPA currently maintains the carbon
treatment units. The following actions were taken by the EPA in 1987 to stabilize the site
and to control the release of hazardous substances into the environment: a shed was
constructed to house material that may be contaminated, including overpacked drums and
roll-off containers; the excavation pit was drained, lined, and backfilled; the pumped liquids
were treated and stored in a holding tank; and the drum burial area was fenced to prevent
access by unauthorized persons.
Entire Site: The EPA investigated site contamination and the most effective
methods to clean up the entire site. Activities included: conducting a survey to
determine the rock formations that exist under the site and to locate any drums
that may be buried on site; conducting a soil gas survey to outline areas of potential
contamination; installing monitoring wells to collect samples for chemical analysis; and
installing soil borings, a technique to analyze soil contamination. The field work was
completed in 1991. The EPA is currently evaluating the results of the investigation. Once
completed, the EPA will select a final remedy for the site cleanup.
HIGGINS FARM 111 March 1992
-------
Alternate Water Supply: In 1990, the EPA selected a remedy to provide a safe
drinking water supply. The remedy includes the design and construction of a water
main extension distribution system, connection to the existing water supply system,
and operation and maintenance of existing carbon adsorption units. The design of the
waterline is nearly completed and the construction is expected to begin shortly.
Site Facts: The EPA notified the potentially responsible parties of their liability for cleanup
activities in 1988 and 1989 and offered them the opportunity to conduct or finance the
investigation of site contamination. These parties refused to undertake the investigation.
Environmental Progress
By providing a temporary water supply until a permanent alternative water source is
connected to residences, the EPA and the State have eliminated immediate threats from
contaminated groundwater at the Higgins Farm site. Protective storage of hazardous
materials and security fences will help prevent contact with contaminants. The EPA will
continue to protect the safety of nearby residents while further investigations leading to the
selection of final cleanup remedies are being completed.
Site Repository
Franklin Township Public Library, 485 DeMott Lane, Somerset, NJ 08872
March 1992
112
HIGGINS FARM
-------
HOPKINS FAR
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980532840
EPA REGION 2
Ocean County
Plumsted Township
Other Names:
Thiokol Chemical Corporation
Site Description
The 57-acre Hopkins Farm site is one of seven similar hazardous waste sites located within a
20-square-mile area in Ocean and Monmouth counties. From 1962 to 1965, the Hopkins
Farm site allegedly was used by Thiokol Chemical Company for the disposal of drummed and
bulk wastes. Pesticides, volatile organic chemicals (VOCs), and heavy metals are among the
contaminants found on site. The site is in a wooded area immediately north of an active farm.
The site is not fenced or posted. The town nearest to the site is New Egypt, approximately 2
miles to the southwest. The Fort Dix Military Reservation is approximately 3 miles to the
south. There are three houses within 1,000 feet of the site, and approximately 760 people live
within a 1-mile radius.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
VOCs have been detected in site soils and groundwater underlying the area. The
soil also is contaminated with VOCs and the heavy metal antimony. The
contaminated groundwater and soil could adversely affect the health of individuals
if accidentally touched or swallowed; however, no contamination of drinking water
wells has been detected.
113
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire
site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1987, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy (NJDEPE) started an investigation to determine the nature and extent
of the contamination at the site. The investigation is scheduled to be completed in
1992. In addition, the party that is potentially responsible for the site contamination will
perform an interim cleanup action during 1992, which will address surface wastes at the site.
Once the studies and interim cleanup action are completed, the EPA will determine if
additional cleanup remedies are necessary.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and
determined that no immediate actions were required at the Hopkins Farm site while further
studies leading to the selection of final cleanup activities are taking place.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
March 1992
114
HOPKINS FARM
-------
IMPERIAL OIL
COMPANY, INC^ /&? M09anvle
CHAMPION \ /~~^~Vv/i/ijBlrch Swamp Brook Dumps #1 and #2
CHEMICALS
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980654099
Site Description
The 14-acre Imperial Oil Co., Inc./Champion Chemicals site consists of seven production,
storage, and maintenance buildings and 56 aboveground storage tanks. Imperial Oil Co., Inc.
blends oil on the site, which is leased from Champion Chemicals. Several companies have
operated at the site in the past. One, a reprocessor of waste oil, may have discharged wastes
to a nearby stream. A waste pile on the premises is contaminated with polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs). The process area is protected by a fence that completely encloses it, and a
security guard is posted 24 hours a day at the front gate. Surrounding the site are many areas
that could be critically affected by the contaminants in the soil and water. A fire pond,
located in the northeastern corner of the property line, is contaminated. A small stream from
the pond eventually flows into Lake Lefferts. Also located around the site are a wetland and
wooded area. Approximately 25,000 people live within 3 miles of the site, and about 760
people are served by private wells drawing from contaminated groundwater.
ev* e, -U-I-* -ru- • u • AA A^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 12/30/82
Federal and State actions. Final Date. 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PCBs,
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), petroleum hydrocarbons, and phthalates,
a plastics by-product. Off-site sediments contain heavy metals including arsenic and
lead, phthalates, and PCBs. The surface soil is contaminated with heavy metals
including chromium, lead, and arsenic, as well as PCBs. Surface water contains
arsenic. Potential health threats include direct contact with, accidental ingestion, or
inhalation of airborne contaminated dust, groundwater, or soil. Using Lake
Lefferts for recreation could lead to exposure to contaminants from the site, and
fish may be contaminated. Wetlands areas also may be threatened.
115 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: an immediate action and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of off-site contamination and on-site contamination.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1991, the EPA excavated and disposed of an on-site waste
filter clay pile. The waste filter clay pile was contaminated with VOCs, PCBs,
metals, and petroleum hydrocarbons. Currently, the EPA is designing a system to
remove an oily layer or "floating products" from the surface of the groundwater beneath the
site.
Off-Site Contamination: In 1990, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up
off-site contamination. The remedy calls for excavation and off-site disposal of
contaminated soils from the wetlands, restoration of affected wetlands, and
installation of a fence to control access to the contaminated soil areas. The design of the
wetland cleanup and restoration is currently underway. In 1991, the fence was installed
around the off-site contaminated areas.
On-Site Contamination: The New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy is investigating the site to determine the nature and extent
of contamination and to identify alternatives for cleanup. The investigation is
scheduled for completion in 1992. The EPA is currently reviewing the results of the
groundwater portion of the investigation. The evaluation is expected to be completed in 1992,
at which time the EPA will select a final cleanup remedy to address on-site groundwater
contamination.
Environmental Progress
The excavation and disposal of an on-site waste filter clay pile have reduced the threat of
exposure to contaminants from the Imperial Oil Company, Inc./Champion Chemicals site
while further studies are completed and cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Marlboro Township Hall, 1979 Township Drive, Marlboro, NJ 07746
March 1992 116 IMPERIAL OIL COMPANY, INC./
CHAMPION CHEMICALS
-------
INDUSTRIAL
LATEX CORP
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD981178411
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
Wellington
Site Description
The 9 1/2-acre Industrial Latex Corp. site houses an inactive facility that produced chemical
adhesives and natural and synthetic rubber compounds. The company put wastes from its
processes into drums and stored or buried them in unlined trenches. Raw materials used to
make latex adhesives and other rubber compounds were stored in 22 underground tanks. The
company also stored waste solvents in aboveground tanks before it flushed them into an
on-site sanitary septic system. Various containers of explosives, flammables, and hazardous
substances were stored in two buildings on the site. The facility was vandalized and sustained
fire damage. The EPA conducted a site inspection in 1986 and found approximately 1,300
drums and pails, 200 buried drums, 2 aboveground storage tanks, 17 underground storage
tanks, and 30 vats of solvents and flammable materials. Many of these containers were
rusting, deteriorating, and leaking. Also, the EPA found numerous drums that contained very
high concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), many of which were leaking directly
onto the ground. The site lies in a residential and commercial area; approximately 10,000
people live within 1/2 mile of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
Soil is contaminated with PCBs, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
toluene, xylene, ethyl benzene, and benzene. Possible health risks include
accidentally ingesting the contaminated soil.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
117
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The EPA removed and treated about 100,000 gallons of
contaminated liquids and removed 22 underground tanks. The tanks were
decontaminated and dismantled for eventual disposal as scrap metal. The site was
stabilized, which included conducting an inventory of materials on the site, removing
shock-sensitive and highly flammable chemicals, and removing 37 truckloads of
non-hazardous, combustible trash. Additionally, the EPA destroyed 1,525 shock-sensitive and
flammable materials, recycled 2,940 gallons of flammable organic liquids, and treated 1,441
gallons of this material. The EPA also treated 115,000 gallons of non-PCB liquid wastes,
incinerated 4,200 gallons of PCB liquid wastes, incinerated 12,048 gallons of flammable PCB
solids, and sent 113,050 gallons of non-flammable PCB solids to an off-site landfill. In 1989,
the EPA repaired the fence around the eastern part of the site. Areas of the fence also were
repaired in 1990 and 1991.
Entire Site: The EPA is conducting a thorough investigation of the site to
determine the type, source, and extent of contamination. Field work includes
sampling and conducting treatability studies to determine the most appropriate
methods to clean up the site. This study is scheduled to be completed in 1992.
Environmental Progress
The removal of drums, tanks, and liquids, the decontamination and treatment of various
waste, and the repairing of the fence have reduced the potential for exposure to
contaminants around the Industrial Latex Corp. site while further investigations leading to the
selection of final cleanup remedies are being conducted.
Site Repository
John F. Kennedy Memorial Library, 92 Hathaway Street, Wallington, NJ 07057
March 1992 118 INDUSTRIAL LATEX CORP.
-------
JACKSON TOWfcKjHm. ^REGION2
LANDFILL - jacks°n
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505283
Site Description
The Jackson Township Landfill operated from 1972 until its closure in 1980. Twenty acres of
this 135-acre site were used for dumping millions of gallons of liquid sewage and septic
wastes. The site, originally a titanium ore mining pit, was turned over to the Township by a
local mining company in the early 1970s. The site contains mine tailings on the surface. The
landfill originally was located in a relatively undeveloped area, but homes were built, and
shallow wells were constructed close to the landfill. In 1977, residents complained of poor
water quality. Tests showed that the Cohansey Aquifer, a shallow aquifer, was contaminated
with a variety of volatile organic chemicals (VOCs). In 1978, Jackson Township advised
residents to stop drinking water from shallow wells. In 1980, a public water supply from a
deep water well located 1/2 mile southeast from the site was extended to residents near the
site. There are approximately 3,200 people living within 3 miles of the site. All of the 165
homes in the area have been connected to the public water supply system, but contamination
of more distant residences on private water wells is possible.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
On-site monitoring wells and nearby residential wells were sampled periodically in
the 1980s and did not confirm the widespread contamination found in 1978. A few
sampling points on site have shown elevated levels of one or more VOCs and
heavy metals in the groundwater and soil. All the nearby residences rely on a
municipal well for their water supply. However, residential wells farther away from
the site may be threatened in the future by the migration of contaminants leaching
from the landfill. Though the landfill is largely secured, individuals may come into
direct contact with or ingest contaminated dust or soil at or near the landfill, which
may pose a potential health threat.
119 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an initial action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Action: In 1980, the State provided an alternate water supply for
residences relying on 130 wells that were contaminated as a result of groundwater
contamination at the landfill.
Entire Site: Jackson Township, under State monitoring, is investigating the nature
and extent of groundwater and soil contamination at the site and is evaluating
cleanup alternatives. The study is scheduled for completion in 1992, at which time
cleanup remedies will be selected for permanent cleanup of site contamination.
Site Facts: In 1988, the State and Jackson Township entered into a Consent Order that
requires the Township to conduct a study of the nature and extent of site contamination.
Environmental Progress
By providing an alternate water supply, the potential for exposure to contaminated
groundwater at the Jackson Township Landfill has been eliminated. The EPA and the State
will continue to ensure the safety of nearby residents while Jackson Township continues with
studies that will identify appropriate cleanup remedies.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
March 1992 120 JACKSON TOWNSHIP LANDFILL
-------
LANDFILL /2>^ EPA REGION 2
LMIMUriLL
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The State requested that the EPA conduct an assessment
of the site contamination. Private water supplies were sampled and found to be
contaminated with VOCs at eight residences and one business. The EPA provided
bottled water to the business and residents of the affected homes. The Monroe Utilities
Authority installed water mains to supply potable water, and the EPA provided hookups at
five properties having contaminated wells. A water main extension providing potable water to
the remaining four homes should be completed by mid-1992.
Entire Site: The State began an investigation of the site in 1986 to determine the
full nature and extent of contamination and to identify alternatives for cleanup.
Activities include sampling of the air, soil, and groundwater. The investigation is
scheduled to be completed in 1992, and a decision on final cleanup remedies will follow.
Site Facts: Twelve potentially responsible parties signed an Administrative Order agreeing
to pay for the full cost of the State's investigation. Eleven additional potentially responsible
parties have been identified and have agreed to contribute to the cost of the EPA site
studies.
Environmental Progress
The provision of bottled water to the affected business and residents and the installation of
water mains to supply potable water have eliminated the potential threat of drinking
groundwater contaminated by JIS Landfill site. The EPA and the State will continue to
ensure the safety of nearby residents and the environment while further studies are taking
place and cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
South Brunswick Public Library, 110 Kingston Lane, Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852
March 1992 122 JIS LANDFILL
-------
KAUFFMAN &
MINTEER, INC
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD002493054
EPA REGION 2
Burlington County
Jobstown
Site Description
Company-owned tanker trucks transport bulk liquids, including synthetic organics, plastics,
resins, vegetable oils, petroleum oils, and alcohols, from the 5-acre Kauffman & Minteer, Inc.
site. From 1960 to 1980, the company discharged wastewater used to clean the inside of its
trucks into an unlined lagoon on site. The plant operators did not attach a retention pond to
the lagoon to handle the overflow of wastewater during heavy rains. In 1984, a dike that
surrounded the lagoon broke, allowing wastewater to migrate off site. In 1990, the company
negotiated an agreement with the EPA to sample and dispose of all wastewater in the lagoon
and fence the area. However, the company did not comply with the agreement, which
prompted the EPA to fence and drain the lagoon in 1991. Contaminants at the site do not
yet threaten the community's groundwater resource, but could impact it in the future. Private
wells within 3 miles of the site provide drinking water to approximately 600 people. The
closest home is 500 feet from the lagoon.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
Chemicals that were detected in the lagoon and on-site soil include various
pesticides and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The pit area is contaminated
with VOCs. The site does not appear, as yet, to have contaminated the
groundwater that nearby residents use for drinking, washing, and irrigating crops.
People may be at risk from direct contact with contaminated lagoon material.
123
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1991, the EPA fenced the site and constructed a berm around
the lagoon to prevent the migration of wastewater off site.
Entire Site: The EPA is conducting a study into the nature and extent of
contamination at the site. The study is scheduled to be completed in early 1993, at
which time a cleanup remedy will be selected.
Site Facts: In 1983, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
(NJDEPE) cited the company for operating the lagoon without the proper permits. The EPA
negotiated an Administrative Order on Consent that required the company to fence the site,
maintain adequate freeboard in the lagoon, install a berm around the lagoon, and conduct
sampling activities. The company's delinquency in performing these activities prompted the
EPA to perform these protective measures in mid-1991.
Environmental Progress
The EPA fenced the site, constructed a berm around the lagoon, and drained the wastewater
lagoon. These actions have reduced threats to the public health and the environment while
further studies are being completed and cleanup activities are being planned at the Kauffman
& Minteer, Inc. site.
Site Repository
Springfield Township Municipal Building, Jobstown Road, Jacksonville, NJ 08041
March 1992 124 KAUFFMAN & MINTEER, INC.
-------
Site Description
KIN-BUC (— /^ EPA REGION 2
• xii^ vw
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the two major mounds and Pool C, and cleanup of Mound B
and the adjacent waterways, wetlands, and groundwater.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1980, the EPA began immediate cleanup activities
consisting of collection, treatment, and disposal of oily and aqueous phase
leachate from Pool C. In 1982, as part of the settlement negotiations, the owners
assumed responsibility for cleanup activities. In 1984, 4,000 drums containing oily and aqueous
phases of leachate and contaminated solids were shipped off site for incineration. From 1984
to 1991, 3,123,755 gallons of aqueous phase leachate were shipped off site for treatment and
disposal. As of 1991, 30,400 gallons of oily phase leachate had been shipped off site for
incineration. This activity continues and is scheduled to be completed in 1994.
Two Major Mounds and Pool C: The cleanup technologies selected in 1988 to
address these areas include: installation of a slurry wall on all sides of the site;
collection and off-site incineration of oily phase leachate; collection and on-site
treatment of aqueous phase leachate and contaminated groundwater with direct surface
water discharge; maintenance and upgrading, if necessary, of the existing cap on Kin-Buc I;
installation of a cap on Kin-Buc II and on portions of the low-lying area between Kin-Buc I
and the Edison Landfill, as well as the Pool C area; long-term periodic monitoring; and
operation and maintenance. The parties potentially responsible for site contamination, under
EPA monitoring, are preparing the technical specifications and design for the selected
cleanup technologies. Cleanup activities for this phase will begin once the design phase is
completed, scheduled in early 1993.
Mound B and Adjacent Waterways, Wetlands, and Groundwater: The
potentially responsible parties, under EPA monitoring, have completed the
investigation into the nature and extent of contamination of the wetlands, surface
water, and groundwater at and adjacent to the site. The investigation identified VOC
contamination in the groundwater, as well as elevated levels of PCBs and metals in sediments
and local wildlife. The potentially responsible parties are currently developing and evaluating
alternative cleanup options for these areas of the site. Once completed, expected in late 1992,
the EPA will evaluate the study findings and select a final cleanup remedy.
Environmental Progress
The numerous immediate cleanup actions to remove leachate and contaminated solids have
reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous substances at the Kin-Buc Landfill site while
design of the selected cleanup technologies for the mounds and Pool C is being conducted
and cleanup activities are being planned for the remaining areas of the site.
March 1992 126 KIN-BUC LANDFILL
-------
Site Repository
Edison Township Library, 340 Plainfield Avenue, Edison, NJ 08817
KIN-BUG LANDFILL
127
March 1992
-------
KING OF
PRUSSIA
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505341
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Camden County
New Jersey Pine Barrens
Other Names:
King of Prussia Technical
Corporation Disposal
The 10-acre King of Prussia (KOP) site was purchased by the Township of King of Prussia
from Winslow Township in 1970. KOP treated industrial waste and disposed of hazardous
liquids on the site and stopped its operations in 1973. From 1973 to 1975, Evor Phillips, Inc.
owned the site and continued operations during part of this period. In 1975, the site was
abandoned. The Township regained ownership of the property in 1976, when it foreclosed
because of unpaid property taxes. Illegal dumping of waste is suspected while the Township
owned the site, because it was unfenced and near the road. The site had six lagoons, an
undetermined number of buried drums, plastic containers, and two rusting and torn tankers.
Records of the site show that approximately 15 million gallons of wastewater containing toxic
chemicals were delivered to the site. Of the six lagoons, the EPA confirmed the visible
remains of four, but the other two lagoons no longer were evident. The site was fenced in
1988 to protect public health and to prevent further illegal dumping of waste on the site. The
site is in a rural area within the Pinelands National Reserve and is adjacent to the Winslow
Wildlife Management Area. The Great Egg Harbor River borders the property.
Approximately 10,000 people live within 3 miles of the site, and 3,000 people depend on
groundwater for drinking water supplies.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/01/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with heavy metals including beryllium, chromium,
copper, and nickel. Groundwater also contains phthalates, a plastic derivative, and
various volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Lagoon sludges are contaminated with
various heavy metals. The soil is contaminated with various heavy metals and
VOCs. Surface water is contaminated with heavy metals including chromium and
copper. People can become exposed to hazardous and toxic chemicals through
accidental ingestion of or direct contact with groundwater, sludge, soil, and surface
water. The site is within the 6,000-acre Winslow Wildlife Management Area, which
is used for recreation. City drinking water is not available in this area; therefore,
residents must use private wells for their water needs.
128
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The EPA fenced the site in 1988 and, in 1989, removed and
disposed of 120 buried plastic containers and the associated contaminated liquids
and soils. In 1990, the EPA removed 200 drums and 235 additional plastic
containers. The EPA initiated the removal of two tankers and their contents in early 1991.
Disposal of the contents of the drums and tankers was completed in late-1991.
Entire Site: The parties potentially responsible for site contamination completed
a study to determine the nature and extent of contamination at the site in 1990.
The EPA and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy have reviewed the study and selected a remedy which includes: excavation and
cleanup of contaminated soils, sediments, and sludges; drum removal and off-site disposal;
tanker removal and off-site disposal; installation of a pump and treat system for contaminated
groundwater; and additional monitoring of the Great Egg Harbor River. The design of the
selected remedy, which includes additional sampling of contaminated areas, began in 1991.
Site Facts: From 1981 to 1992, the EPA sent out 63 Request for Information letters to gain
information about possible potentially responsible parties. Five waste generators signed an
Administrative Order on Consent in 1985 to conduct a site investigation. The EPA has
identified nine additional parties who are potentially responsible for contaminating the site. In
1991, the EPA issued an order to five potentially responsible parties to design and conduct
cleanup activities at the site.
Environmental Progress
The removal of the drums and contaminated materials and the fencing of the site have
reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the King of Prussia site while
final cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Camden City Library, 418 Federal Street, Camden, NJ 08101
KING OF PRUSSIA 129 March 1992
-------
KRYSOWATY
FARM
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980529838
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Somerset County
Hillsborough Township
Other Names:
Three Bridges Drum Dump
The 1-acre Krysowaty Farm site was a waste disposal area where approximately 500 drums of
paint and dye wastes were allegedly dumped, crushed, and buried from 1965 to 1970. In
addition to drums, other wastes including demolition debris, tires, automobiles, bulk wastes,
solvents, and waste sludge were disposed of at the farm. Local residents became concerned
when they smelled odors in their well water. The New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) investigated the site in 1979 and found volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) in the groundwater. The Township provided bottled water to nearby
residents in 1982. Approximately 1,200 people live within a mile of the site. The closest
residences are 900 feet from the farm.
Site Responsibility: This site was addressed through
Federal, State, and municipal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 07/23/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Deleted Date: 02/22/89
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater, soil, and site debris were contaminated with VOCs, pesticides, base
and neutral compounds, and traces of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The State
and the EPA have determined that, as a result of cleanup actions taken at
Krysowaty Farm, the site no longer poses a threat to the public health or the
environment. The site has been deleted from the National Priorities List.
Cleanup Approach
This site was addressed in two stages: an immediate action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
130
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: In 1982, the Township began to provide bottled water to
nearby residents affected by contaminated well water.
Entire Site: In 1984, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site which
included: excavating soil and wastes and disposing of them in an approved facility;
providing a permanent alternate water supply to the residents affected by
contaminated well water; and monitoring the site for five years to ensure the actions taken
had been effective. The EPA extended the Elizabethtown Water Company water main to the
affected residences. Approximately 13,700 cubic yards of contaminated soil were removed and
disposed of at an approved hazardous waste disposal facility. The site was backfilled, covered
with clean soil, and seeded in 1986. Additionally, future development of the site area and
installation of private wells have been prohibited to ensure that residents are protected from
any residual contamination. The State of New Jersey monitored the groundwater for five
years to ensure the cleanup activities have been effective. This monitoring program was
successfully completed in 1992.
Environmental Progress
All cleanup activities have been completed at the Krysowaty Farm site. The provision of a
permanent alternate water supply has eliminated the threat to public health posed by
contaminated groundwater. The EPA has determined that surface contamination has been
cleaned to Federal standards and that no further cleanup actions are required at the site. The
site is now safe for nearby residents and the environment, and has been deleted from the
NPL.
Site Repository
Information is no longer available.
KRYSOWATY FARM
131
March 1992
-------
LANDFILL AND
DEVELOPMENT^^ \ "SSttSSX*
COMPANY ^TVX «""—
Lir-iAf irrnorrw ^vl^^ /J ^^ r SCA Services
NEW JERSEY ^^^J Mt. Holly Landfill
EPA ID# NJD048044325
Site Description
The 200-acre Landfill and Development Company site consists of two sections: the
Easthampton/Lumberton section and the Mt. Holly section. The site, originally a sand and
gravel pit, accepted municipal refuse, industrial and commercial solid waste, and treated
sewage sludge. In 1973, the State directed the landfill to conduct groundwater tests. The
results indicated contamination by volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In 1977, the State
ordered the company to correct the groundwater contamination by replacing private wells,
installing a liner at the landfill, and pumping and treating the contaminated groundwater. The
Easthampton/Lumberton section of the landfill was closed in 1981 when it reached its
capacity. The State closed the Mt. Holly section in 1986. Approximately 20,000 people live
within 2 miles of the site. Fifty homes are located 500 feet away. Ten of these houses use
private water wells for drinking water; the rest use municipal wells. The landfill lies within the
drainage basin of Rancocas Creek. The Smithville Canal is within the flood plain of the creek
and discharges into it. Smithville Lake is located 1,600 feet away from the site. All these
bodies of water are used for recreational activities.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
The aquifers are contaminated with various VOCs and heavy metals including
arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel, and silver. Sediments from Rancocas Creek and
Smithville Canal contain heavy metals including cadmium, nickel, selenium, and
zinc. Rancocas Creek is contaminated with cadmium and silver. The Smithville
Canal contains silver. Although the majority of the residents are supplied by
municipal water wells, some residences still use private wells. These wells are not
contaminated; however, there is a potential that pollutants may migrate to them.
Rancocas Creek and Smithville Canal are used for recreational activities. Seeps
from the landfill have polluted these waters. People may be at risk from direct
contact with contaminated sediments or accidental ingestion of contaminated
groundwater or sediments.
132 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an initial action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Action: The company, under supervision of the New Jersey Department
of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE), connected residences to
public water supplies and installed a liner at the landfill to prevent further
migration of contaminants.
Entire Site: The company is conducting an investigation under the supervision of
the NJDEPE to determine the extent of groundwater, soil, and surface water
contamination at the landfill. Once the investigation is completed, scheduled for
early 1994, final cleanup measures will be recommended for the site.
Environmental Progress
The connection of area homes to the public water supplies has reduced the potential for
health threats at the Landfill and Development Company site while studies are being
completed and cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Burlington County Library, Main Library, West Woodlane Road, Mount Holly, NJ 08060
LANDFILL AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
133
March 1992
-------
LANG PROPER
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505382
EPA REGION 2
Burlington County
Pemberton Township
Site Description
The 2-acre Lang Property site is located on a 40-acre parcel of land and was used as an
illegal dumping ground for abandoned vehicles, tires, and other debris. In 1975, between
1,200 and 1,500 drums of unidentified chemical waste were discovered on the property. The
owners removed the drums in 1976. Before their removal, the drums were emptied into
unlined pits or the contents were spilled on the ground. Tests conducted by the County and
State confirmed groundwater and surface water contamination. The aquifer beneath the site
supplies drinking water to 13,000 residents. As many as 20 private wells are located within 1
mile of the site. The site is drained by several man-made ditches that flow through wetlands
before entering Rancocas Creek. The property is situated within New Jersey's Pineland
National Reserve, a forest nationally recognized as a valuable environmental resource.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, soil, surface water, and sediments are contaminated with various
volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Soil also is contaminated with pesticides.
People who touch or drink contaminated groundwater from wells may be at risk.
People who enter the site and touch or accidentally ingest the soil or sediments
may be harmed. Surface water is used to flood the cranberry bogs in the area.
Although cranberries and blueberries are not contaminated, they may become so if
surface water contamination increases and migrates to cultivated areas. The site is
in the Pinelands National Reserve, and the levels of contaminants detected may
pose a hazard to wildlife inhabiting the forest.
134
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the entire
site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: In 1986, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site which
included: excavating contaminated soil and material and disposing of it in a
federally approved facility; extracting and treating the contaminated groundwater
and then reinjecting the treated water into the aquifer; filling and grading the excavated area;
installing a security fence; and monitoring the site to ensure the cleanup actions have been
effective. In 1988, the EPA excavated 13,200 tons of contaminated soil and transported it to
a federally approved facility. The excavated area was backfilled and graded with clean soil.
Contaminated site water also was treated. Storage drums were crushed and disposed of at an
approved facility. The EPA is developing the engineering design for the groundwater
treatment system. Construction and implementation of the groundwater pump and treat
system is expected to begin in 1992, upon completion of some further study of the leachability
of contaminants into the groundwater.
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated soil and drums, treatment of contaminated site water, and
securing of the Lang Property site have reduced the potential health risks while the
engineering design for the groundwater treatment system is being completed.
Site Repository
Community Library, 348 Lakehurst Road, Brownsmill, NJ 08015
LANG PROPERTY
135
March 1992
-------
LIPARI LANDFILL
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980505416
EPA REGION 2
Gloucester County
Mantua Township
Other Names:
Lipari Landfill Nick
Site Description
The 15-acre Lipari Landfill is an inactive landfill that, between 1958 and 1971, accepted
household waste, liquid and semi-solid chemical wastes, and other industrial materials. These
wastes were disposed of in trenches originally excavated for sand and gravel. Approximately
3,000,000 gallons of liquid wastes and about 12,000 cubic yards of solid wastes were disposed
of at the site. Some of the wastes included solvents, paints and thinners, formaldehyde, dust
collector residues, resins, and solid press cakes from the industrial production of paints and
solvents. Prior to the closing of the landfill in 1971 by the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy, at least one explosion and two fires were reported at
the site. Contaminants have seeped into the aquifers underneath the site and have leached
into nearby marshlands, Chestnut Branch Stream, Rabbit Run Stream, and Alcyon Lake. The
lake has been closed to recreational use. Approximately 11,000 people depend on
groundwater for drinking water supplies within 3 miles of the site. Fruit orchards are adjacent
to the site. Chestnut Branch is a tributary to the Delaware River.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
m
Air is contaminated with various volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Groundwater, surface water, and sediments are contaminated with VOCs and
heavy metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead. Soil is contaminated with
VOCs, heavy metals, and phthalates. Leachate contains VOCs; heavy metals
including arsenic, beryllium, chromium, lead, zinc, and nickel; and phenols. People
who touch or drink the contaminated groundwater may suffer adverse health
effects. Although Alcyon Lake has been closed because of contamination, people
who trespass, swim, or consume fish taken from the lake may be at risk. Pollutants
seeping into the marshlands and streams may harm the wildlife inhabiting the area.
136
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: initial actions and three long-term remedial phases
focusing on source control, cleanup of groundwater and leachate, and off-site cleanup
activities.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The EPA drilled and sampled 16 monitoring wells to determine
the groundwater flow and the extent of contamination. A security fence was
installed by the EPA to restrict access to the landfill in 1982, and additional
fencing was installed by the EPA between 1983 and 1985 to restrict access to neighboring
wetlands areas.
Source Control: In 1982, the EPA selected a remedy to stop the pollutants from
migrating from the landfill. A landfill containment system consisting of a cut-off
wall around the area was constructed to divert surface water runoff and the
landfill was covered with a synthetic membrane landfill cover. The EPA completed the wall
and covered the landfill in 1984.
Groundwater and Leachate: In 1985, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up
the groundwater and leachate from the landfill including: installing extraction and
injection wells in the landfill containment system to flush the system and pump the
contaminated groundwater and leachate; treating the pumped water on site and then
discharging it to a trunkline; installing monitoring wells downhill from the site; and continuing
groundwater treatment to meet applicable safety standards. The EPA installed the landfill
injection and extraction wells and completed construction of the treatment plant in early
1992. Shakedown operations of the wells and treatment plant are underway. Once the plant is
fully operational, the groundwater will be flushed to remove contaminants for a period of
approximately 7 years.
Off-Site Contamination: In 1988, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the
off-site contamination including: collecting the groundwater and leachate in the
aquifers outside the containment system, treating them, and discharging the
treated water into the county sewer lines; excavating and dewatering the contaminated soils
in Chestnut Branch Marsh, dredging and dewatering the contaminated sediments in Alcyon
Lake, Chestnut Branch, and Rabbit Run, and removing the pollutants by heating the soil and
sediment; instituting temporary measures, if necessary, to reduce vapors from the leachate
seepage areas in Chestnut Branch Marsh; and monitoring the off-site areas to ensure that
the on-site cleanup is effective. The EPA currently is designing the technical specifications to
clean up the marsh, aquifers, streams, and lake. The cleanup activities are expected to begin
in 1993, once the design phase is completed.
Site Facts: In 1982, the EPA and Nicholas Lipari entered into a Consent Decree.
LIPARI LANDFILL 137 March 1992
-------
Environmental Progress
Securing the site and constructing the landfill containment system have reduced the potential
for exposure to hazardous materials at the Lipari Landfill site while further cleanup activities
are taking place.
Site Repository
McCowan Library, 15 Pitman Avenue, Pitman, NJ 08071
March 1992
138
LIPARI LANDFILL
-------
LODI MUNICIP
WELL
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980769301
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
Borough of Lodi
The Lodi Municipal Well site consists of 11 municipal wells that previously were used to
provide drinking water to the Borough. One well, Garfield Avenue, was closed in 1981 due to
volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination. In 1983, the Home Place Well was found
to have elevated levels of radioactivity and was closed by the Borough, based on the
recommendation of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
(NJDEPE). Testing by the State in 1985 revealed tap water to be contaminated with VOCs.
The remaining wells were tested and found to be contaminated; all the wells were closed by
1987. Approximately 95 percent of Lodi's drinking water now is supplied by the Passaic Valley
Water Commission, and the remainder is purchased from the Hackensack Water Company.
Approximately 24,000 people live in Lodi and depended on these wells for their drinking
water. The Saddle River flows though the Borough, but it is not used for recreation or
fishing. Lodi also is situated between the Hackensack and Passaic Rivers.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and municipal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 08/30/90
Threats and Contaminants
The wells contain various VOCs as well as uranium and radium-226. However, the
Borough of Lodi has closed the wells that tap into the contaminated aquifer.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two phases: an initial action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
139
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Initial Action: During the 1980s, the Borough of Lodi closed 11 wells, based on
sampling data from the NJDEPE and the Lodi Water Department. Additionally,
alternate water supplies were provided to affected residents.
Entire Site: The EPA is conducting a study to determine the type, extent, and
source of the groundwater contamination. At the request of the State, with EPA
concurrence, secondary bedrock and groundwater sampling is being done to
determine if radionuclide contamination is the result of natural or man-made sources. The
sampling began in mid-1991. The investigation is scheduled for completion in 1992. After
review, various alternatives will be evaluated for site cleanup.
Environmental Progress
Closing contaminated wells and providing an alternate water supply have reduced the
potential for exposure to contaminants from the Lodi Municipal Well site while studies are
being completed and cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Lodi Memorial Library, 1 Memorial Drive, Lodi, NJ 07644
March 1992
140
LODI MUNICIPAL WELL
-------
I OMF PIMF .X, h>^ EPA REGION 2
LUIMC MIME / « /g} Monmouth County
LANDFILL ^f^— ^^ Freehold
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505424
Site Description
The Lone Pine Landfill site is a former municipal landfill covering 63 acres in Freehold
Township. The facility operated from 1959 until 1979, when it was closed by the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy. The landfill accepted over 17,000
drums containing chemical wastes, along with municipal refuse, large volumes of septage, and
millions of gallons of bulk liquid chemical wastes. Leachate contaminated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) enters the groundwater and flows from the site to the Manasquan River;
the headwaters of the Manasquan River are about 500 feet away. The heavily wooded area
surrounding the site is sparsely populated, with the nearest residences approximately 1/4 to
1/2 mile away. The Turkey Swamp Fish and Wildlife Management Area and a local
sportsman club are about 1,000 feet from the site. Drinking water in the area is obtained
from groundwater resources. A 700-acre municipal water-supply reservoir, which will draw
water from the river, is to be constructed about 16 miles downriver from the property. The
two aquifers underneath the site are contaminated.
o,.. _, ...... rr, . . . , . ,, , t, , NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Air may be contaminated with VOCs such as benzene and toluene, depending on
weather conditions and proximity to the site. Groundwater is contaminated with
VOCs and heavy metals such as cadmium and arsenic. The sediments of the
Manasquan River and soils are contaminated with VOCs including benzene,
chlorobenzene, and ethyl benzene. The Manasquan River is contaminated with low
levels of VOCs and the heavy metals cadmium and lead. The wastes found in the
excavated drums contained VOCs and cadmium, chromium, lead, and arsenic.
People who touch or ingest contaminated groundwater, soil, or wastes may be at
risk. Because contaminants are leaching into the Manasquan River, those who use
it for recreation may be exposed to the pollutants. People who inhale vapors from
the site may suffer adverse health effects. The site is near a wildlife management
area; any pollutants seeping into this area may harm the wildlife. Hunters from the
nearby sportsman club may be exposed to contaminants should they eat any game
caught in the area.
141 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of the on-
site landfill and groundwater and cleanup of the off-site groundwater contamination.
Response Action Status
On-site Landfill/Groundwater Cleanup: In 1984, the EPA selected a remedy
to clean up the aquifer by installing a shallow cut-off wall and sealing the surface
of the landfill; installing an extraction system to collect the groundwater within the
perimeter of the wall; treating the on-site collected groundwater and then discharging the
treated water into a sewer line for further treatment at the Ocean County Utilities Authority;
and monitoring the site to ensure the cleanup has been effective. The potentially responsible
parties began cleanup activities in mid-1991 and are scheduled to complete the work in 1994.
Groundwater and Off-Site Contamination: One of the parties potentially
responsible for the contamination completed a study, under EPA monitoring, to
determine the extent of groundwater contamination. In 1990, the EPA selected a
remedy for cleanup which includes: extraction of contaminated groundwater, on-site
treatment of the contaminated groundwater, discharge of the treated groundwater into a
sewer line for further treatment at the Ocean County Utilities Authority, and the installation
of a 2,800-foot interceptor drain to prevent contamination of the Manasquan River. The
potentially responsible parties have been collecting field data in preparation for the start of
the remedy design. Additional data may need to be collected. The design phase is expected
to begin soon and is scheduled to be completed in 1993, at which time final cleanup actions
will begin.
Site Facts: Under a Consent Decree in March 1990, the parties potentially responsible for
contamination at the site will perform landfill cleanup activities. Under a second Consent
Decree entered into in January 1992, the potentially responsible parties will design the
groundwater treatment technologies.
Environmental Progress
Construction activities addressing the landfill cleanup are underway. Based on field data that
were collected in late 1991, the potentially responsible parties are expected to begin the
engineering design of the remedy that will address groundwater cleanup.
Site Repository
Monmouth County Public Library, 25 Breod Street, Freehold, NJ 07728
March 1992 142 LONE PINE LANDFILL
-------
M & T DELISA
LANDFILL
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD085632164
EPA REGION 2
Monmouth County
Asbury Park
Other Names:
Seavlew Square Mall
Site Description
The M & T Delisa Landfill accepted municipal waste from 1945 to 1975 on a 132-acre site in
Asbury Park. Seaview Square Mall was constructed on about 25 to 30 acres of the landfill in
1976. Although the mall itself is situated on clean fill, the parking lot is built on refuse.
Methane gas vents are located around the parking lot, and a system to collect leachate runs
beneath it. In 1980, the EPA observed leachate seeping from the site into a nearby stream
that empties into Deal Lake. However, investigations indicated that groundwater, surface
water, and soil were not impacted by the site. In 1983, the mall and surrounding outside areas
were tested for methane gas migration. The results indicated a plume of methane existed
about 1 to 3 feet below the ground outside the mall. Approximately 2,300 people live within a
1-mile radius of the site. There are 34 private wells within 3 miles of the landfill, and
approximately 120 people draw drinking water from these wells. Deal Lake is less than a mile
away and is used for recreational activities, including fishing.
Site Responsibility:
This site was addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/01/82
Final Date: 09/01/83
Deleted Date: 03/21/91
Threats and Contaminants
Sampling at the site showed that groundwater contained low levels of heavy metals
such as arsenic, chromium, and lead and methylene chloride. Sediments contained
low concentrations of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PNAs) and the heavy
metals arsenic, mercury, lead, and zinc. Storm drains and leachate seeping from
the site contained methylene chloride, chromium, lead, and arsenic.
143
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
Intensive investigations of site conditions showed that the site does not pose a threat to
people or the environment.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The owner of the site, under EPA monitoring, conducted a study to
determine the nature and extent of groundwater, surface water, and soil
contamination at the site. This study revealed that there was no disposal of
hazardous waste at the site in the past and that the site is not a source of significant
concentrations of any hazardous substances. In September 1990, the EPA decided that the
site would be addressed more appropriately through monitoring by the State under its solid
waste disposal regulations. These actions are pending.
Site Facts: In 1983, the EPA'Issued an Administrative Order on Consent to the owner of
the site that required that the owner conduct site studies and perform any necessary cleanup
activities.
Environmental Progress
After the M & T Delisa site was added to the NPL, a study to determine the nature and
extent of contamination at the site revealed that there were no significant concentrations of
any hazardous substances. The site has been deleted from the NPL and will be monitored
under State waste disposal authorities.
Site Repository
Information is no longer available.
March 1992 144 M & T DELISA LANDFILL
-------
MANNHEIM
AVENUE DUMP « Vx¥0 GallowayT0""iship
X. •r^fcjx
KIC1AI ICDCCV > XV/T^ Other Names:
NEW JERSEY ] ^2^ LenoxChina> lnc.
EPAID# NJD980654180
Site Description
The 2-acre Mannheim Avenue Dump site is located in Galloway Township. The site is a
municipal landfill where approximately 300 drums (11,400 pounds) of degreasing sludge from
Lenox China were disposed of in a 15-foot pit during the 1960s, and possibly, into the early
1970s. This waste was compacted into approximately 35 mounds and was covered with soil.
Leaded glazed waste, plaster molds, and china and clay forms also were mixed in with the
mounded waste piles. An aquifer that provides the source of water for local residents lies 20
to 30 feet below the site. Approximately 1,300 area residents depend on shallow groundwater
under the site for drinking water, the majority of which comes from private wells. A public
school well is located in the vicinity of the site. The nearest residence is 1/10 mile from the
site.
ev* n -U-I-* TU- v • u • AA A^ u Npl- LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The underlying aquifer contains the volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
trichloroethylene (TCE) and toluene from the site disposal areas. Soil was
contaminated with TCE and lead. Residual levels still exist in the soils at a level
below New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
(NJDEPE) action levels. There is a potential future risk of contaminants migrating
in groundwater to residential wells. The site is fenced, and warning signs have been
posted around the perimeter.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
145 March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1985, the parties potentially responsible for the site
contamination removed approximately 25,000 pounds of asphaltic sludge from soil
mounds for incineration. Approximately 2,700 cubic yards of residual
contaminated soil remained. Other activities completed in 1985 include installing a fence
around the site and sampling waste piles. The potentially responsible parties performed
on-site sampling and installed monitoring wells, under EPA oversight, beginning in 1986. In
1989, the potentially responsible parties removed soil mounds containing residual lead and
TCE contaminants from the site to an approved facility.
Entire Site: Under State and EPA supervision, the parties potentially responsible
for the site contamination conducted an investigation to determine the nature and
extent of contamination at the site. In 1990, the EPA selected a remedy for
cleanup of the site which includes: extraction of the contaminated groundwater from the
aquifer, on-site treatment using air stripping, and discharge of the treated groundwater into
the aquifer; short-term monitoring of the groundwater during the engineering design of the
treatment system; long-term monitoring of the groundwater during cleanup; and installation
of individual carbon adsorption treatment units at residences if monitoring indicates that
groundwater contamination threatens residential wells. The engineering design for the
cleanup remedy began in late 1991. Cleanup is scheduled to begin in early 1993. Since 1990,
the EPA has been sampling nearby downgradient residential drinking water wells on a
quarterly basis. Sampling to date has indicated that site-related contaminants have not
migrated into the groundwater to threaten the residential wells.
Site Facts: The NJDEPE sent Information Request Letters to the parties potentially
responsible for site contamination in 1983 and 1984. A Unilateral Administrative Order was
issued to Lenox, Inc. and Galloway Township by the EPA and the State of New Jersey. This
Order required these two parties to remove contaminants from the site. In 1987, the EPA
issued Notice Letters to Lenox, Inc. and to the Township of Galloway. As a result, Lenox,
Inc. agreed to perform an investigation into site contamination and the most effective
cleanup methods. In 1988, the EPA entered into an Administrative Order on Consent with
Lenox, Inc. and the Township of Galloway to perform the site investigation and cleanup
activities.
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated sludge and soil and the installation of a security fence have
reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the Mannheim Ave. Dump site
while a final groundwater remedy is being designed.
Site Repository
Galloway Township Public Library, 30 West Jim Leeds Road, Pomona, NJ 08240
March 1992 146 MANNHEIM AVENUE DUMP
-------
MAYWOOD /^ X>^ EPtS°N2
Maywood and Rochelle Park
COMPANY I ° Cft Maywood Residences
NEW JERSEY ( l]J stepanChemical
EPA ID# NJD980529762
Site Description
The Maywood Chemical Company site consists of three connected areas: the Stepan
Chemical Company property; the Sears and adjacent property; and the Maywood Interim
Storage Site (MISS), owned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). From 1916 to 1955,
Maywood processed radioactive thorium ore to produce the mantles in gas lanterns and
pumped all process wastes to diked areas west of the plant. In 1932, State Route 17 was built
through the disposal area. Some of the waste materials were excavated and used as fill dirt
and mulch for nearby properties. Waste materials were also transported by surface water
runoff and through poor waste management practices. The result was chemical and
radioactive contamination over much of the local area. Maywood was bought by Stepan
Chemical Company in 1959. Radiological contamination was accidentally discovered by an
area resident in 1980 on property formerly owned by Stepan Chemical Company. Testing
revealed extensive low-level contamination at several locations. The DOE owns 11 3/4 acres
of land along the Stepan property on which it constructed the MISS. Contaminated soils that
are removed from the various Maywood sites are stored there until a permanent storage
facility is identified. The Sears, Roebuck and Co. leases 31 acres of property just south of
the MISS and Stepan Chemical Company property. Its warehouse covers about 1/3 of the
grounds; 225 employees work there. The rest of the property is covered by grass and marsh,
with several commercial facilities located to the south. Drums containing volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and phthalates were discovered buried under the property. The MISS is
a fenced vacant lot of 11 3/4 acres. Low-level radioactive wastes have been piled on 2 acres,
and another area was prepared as a second storage pile. The waste stored at the site is from
cleanup actions conducted in 1984 and 1985 on several nearby properties. The MISS lies in a
highly developed residential and industrial area that runs along the border between Maywood
and Rochelle Park. The properties have been certified for unrestricted use by DOE. DOE
drilled monitoring wells here as part of their monitoring of the MISS; early indications are
that this area also is contaminated with radioactivity and chemicals. Contamination has been
found in three off-site areas as well. The Lodi Municipal Wells (now a site on the NPL) have
been closed. VOCs were detected in the Maywood Municipal Pool in 1986, and similar
contaminants were seen in a residential well upgradient of the site. The site surroundings are
commercial, industrial, and residential. Approximately 30,000 people live within a 3-mile
radius of the site. The local drinking water comes from municipal and private wells; the
closest well is 1,500 feet from the site. Local surface water is used for recreation. Some
brooks flow through the contaminated areas, eventually feeding the Saddle River.
147 March 1992
-------
o-» 0 -U-I-* ^u• • • , - jj ,4 u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Radon gas was present in a home near the site. Groundwater at the MISS has
been contaminated with VOCs and heavy metals. Radioactive pollutants are also
present in the groundwater. Soil on various parts of the site is contaminated with
radioactive wastes, including thorium and radium, as well as VOCs and heavy
metals. Drinking or otherwise coming in contact with contaminated groundwater,
inhaling contaminated dusts and volatile gases, or touching contaminated soils may
adversely affect the health of nearby residents.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of radiological contamination and cleanup of non-radiological
contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: DOE started removing contaminated soil from affected
residences in 1984. These materials were stored at the MISS. Contaminated
materials were excavated at the Bailed property, an area containing lagoons which
received thorium processing wastes, and removed them to the MISS in 1985. Additional
cleanup efforts took place through 1986 as other contaminated properties were identified.
Radiological Contamination: DOE is investigating the radiological
contamination at the site. Field work has been completed; a draft report is
expected to be submitted to the EPA in 1992. The investigation is determining the
nature and extent of the contamination and will be the basis for recommending the final
cleanup strategies at the MISS and all areas of the site where contamination is above the
EPA/DOE action levels. A decision regarding the cleanup technologies is expected in late
1993.
March 1992 148 MAYWOOD CHEMICAL COMPANY
-------
Non-Radiological Chemical Contamination: In late 1991, the Stepan
Chemical Company began an intensive study of non-radiological chemical
contamination at the site. This investigation is exploring the nature and extent of
contamination and will lead to the selection of final cleanup remedies in late 1993.
Site Facts: A Special Notice Letter for conducting a study of the site was issued to Stepan
Chemical Company and all other owners of the contaminated property in 1987. After several
negotiation meetings with the potentially responsible parties, Stepan Chemical Company
presented a good faith offer to conduct the study. As a result of further negotiations, an
Administrative Order on Consent was signed by Stepan Chemical Company and the EPA in
1987. A second Administrative Order on Consent was issued by the EPA and signed by both
parties, requiring Stepan Chemical Company to conduct investigations at the Stepan
Chemical Company property. As a result of an Interagency Agreement recently entered into
by the EPA and DOE, the EPA is overseeing DOE investigations of radiological site
contamination.
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated soil from residential areas has reduced the potential for
exposure to radioactive materials at the Maywood Chemical Company site while
investigations that will lead to selection of the final cleanup remedies are taking place.
Site Repository
Maywood Public Library, 459 Maywood Avenue, Maywood, NJ 07607
MAYWOOD CHEMICAL COMPANY
149
March 1992
-------
METALTEC/ ^>, E™ RE°'°N 2
1 _jm^^ S ^^ TM / Sussex County
AEROSYSTEM!^^^TV^ Franklin Borough
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID#NJD002517472
Site Description
Metaltec, a subsidiary of Aerosystems Technology Corporation, produced metal ball point pen
casings, paint spray guns, lipstick cases, and a variety of other goods on this 15 1/2-acre site
from 1965 to 1980. While in operation, the facility consisted of the plant, a process well, an
unlined wastewater lagoon, and a drum storage area. A pile of waste material called the
"Green Powder Pile" also is known to have existed at the site. The company moved to an
industrial park in 1980. In 1980, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy (NJDEPE) inspected the site and began sampling. Results revealed the presence
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals in the facility's wastewater lagoon
and surrounding soil. These contaminants leached from the lagoon into surrounding
groundwater. Upon sampling residential wells, State analysts found VOCs at levels above
Federal standards for drinking water. The Franklin Water Supply Well and polluted private
wells were closed in 1980, and affected residents were connected to the Borough's primary
water supply. The site lies in a valley drained by a small unnamed stream that flows into
Wildcat Brook, a tributary of the Walkill River. The property now is abandoned. Franklin
Pond lies 3/4 mile northeast of the site. The now-closed Franklin Water Supply Well, which
served as a secondary water supply source, is about 400 feet east of the property.
Approximately 4,000 people live within 3 miles of the site. Local surface water is used for
recreation, fishing, and swimming.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through proposed Date: 12/30/82
Federal actions. Final Date: Q9/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and soil are contaminated with various VOCs and heavy metals. Low
levels of cadmium were detected in the water and sediment samples from the
stream flowing through two of the contaminated areas. The drinking and normal
use of contaminated groundwater pose the likeliest health hazard, but
contaminated wells have been closed.
150 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on source control of
site pollutants and groundwater cleanup.
Response Action Status
Source Control: In 1986, the EPA selected a remedy for cleaning up the sources
of pollution at the site. The remedy features: excavating and treating 10,000 cubic
yards of soils contaminated with VOCs in Parcel 1 and taking them off site for
disposal at an EPA-approved landfill; excavating 4,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils from
Parcels 2, 3, and 4 and disposing of them off site at an EPA-approved landfill; providing an
alternate water supply for Franklin Borough to replace lost drinking water capacity; and
studying the site further to identify the extent of groundwater contamination and to evaluate
the best options for cleanup. The EPA conducted the engineering design for the first three
parts of the remedy in 1987 and 1988. Cleanup activities began with removal of the
contaminated soils. The EPA excavated 5,000 cubic yards from Parcels 2, 3, and 4, and
transported them to an approved landfill, treated contaminated site water, backfilled the
excavated areas with clean fill, and disposed of drums stored on the surface. Excavation of
the soil from Parcel 1 will begin in 1992. An alternate water supply pipeline providing water
from two privately developed wells has been completed.
Groundwater: In 1990, the EPA proposed a plan for treating contaminated
groundwater. The remedy selected by the EPA includes extracting the
contaminated groundwater and treating it by air stripping to remove the VOCs.
Any remaining organic contaminants will be removed by carbon adsorption. The treated
groundwater will be discharged into the unnamed tributary of Wildcat Brook. The site will be
monitored to ensure the effectiveness of the remedy. Design of the selected remedy has been
initiated and is scheduled to be completed in 1993.
Environmental Progress
The source control actions and the completion of some cleanup measures as described above
have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the Metaltec/Aerosystems
site while further cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Sussex County Library, Dennis Memorial Branch Library, 101 Main Street,
Newton, NJ 07860
METALTEC/AEROSYSTEMS 151 March 1992
-------
MONITOR DEVIC
INTERCIRCUIT
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980529408
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Monmouth County
Lackwood Industrial Park
From 1977 to 1981, Monitor Devices/Intercircuits Inc. manufactured printed circuit boards at
this 2-acre site. The manufacturers leased the property from the site owner. Two structures
stand on the property: the main building holding the business office and production lines, and
a small storage shed. The process of discharging wastewater from operations involved the use
of copper, tin, lead, nickel, and gold cyanide, and treatment with sulfuric acid, fluoboric acid,
and acetone. Operators discharged process wastewater either into a small, unlined pond or
directly on the ground at the rear of the building. In addition, drums and plastic containers
were improperly stored outdoors and were observed to be in poor condition. In 1980, after
observing the company's waste handling practices, the State ordered the company to sample
groundwater and to clean up the site as necessary. The company moved out in 1981 without
fully complying with the order. In 1983, Monmouth County filed criminal charges against the
company for violating environmental laws. The company went bankrupt in 1988. The site
currently is an active furniture business employing 6 to 8 workers. It is unfenced and has no
warning signs. The site is surrounded by industrial and commercial areas located within a
small airport; there are no residences within 1 mile. Two public water supply wells lie about 2
miles upgradient of the site, which supply drinking water to approximately 24,000 people. An
industrial well is located downgradient of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 04/10/85
Final Date: 06/10/86
152
March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater and soil contain heavy metals including copper, chromium,
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The nearby population may be at risk
through direct contact with or accidental ingestion of contaminated soil.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in a long-term remedial phase focusing on groundwater and soil
cleanup.
Response Action Status
Groundwater and Soil: In 1986, the State began an intensive two-phase
investigation of soil and groundwater contamination at the site. This investigation
is exploring the nature and extent of pollution problems and will result in
recommendations for final cleanup. The first phase, which has been completed, involved
investigation of soil, subsurface soil, and groundwater contamination. The second phase will
fine-tune the findings from the first phase of the investigation by sampling several more wells
to define the extent of the groundwater plume. The EPA is responsible for conducting the
second phase of the investigation, scheduled to be completed in late 1993.
Environmental Progress
After adding this site to the NPL, the EPA performed preliminary investigations and
determined that no immediate actions were required at the Monitor Devices/Intercircuits Inc.
site to protect public health or the environment while further studies that will lead to the
selection of final cleanup remedies are being completed.
Site Repository
Wall Township Library, Old Mill Plaza, State Highway 35, Sea Girt, NJ 08750
MONITOR DEVICES/INTERCIRCUITS INC. 153 March 1992
-------
MONROE TOW
LANDFILL
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505671
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Middlesex County
Monroe
Other Names:
Browning-Ferris Ind.
Princeton Disposal
International Disposal
BFI of South Jersey, Inc.
The 86-acre Monroe Township Landfill first was operated by Monroe Township in 1955,
leased to the Princeton Disposal Co. in 1968, and finally acquired by Browning-Ferris
Industries, Inc. (BFI) of South Jersey, Inc. in 1972. The New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) ordered it closed in 1978, after liquids
seeping from the landfill overflowed into a street. This leachate also was found to be
contaminating streams that drain the landfill area. Analysis showed the liquids contained
volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This off-site migration of leachate caused the
abandonment of a housing construction project. Hydrochloric acid is known to have been
stored in lagoons at the site. The State sampled six drinking water wells near the site in 1979
and found varying concentrations of VOCs. One well was closed, which prompted more
investigative sampling. Although the next round of analysis showed considerably lower
concentrations of pollutants, municipal water lines were provided to some area residents in
1979 and 1980. A cut-off wall and leachate collection drain were installed in 1980. Leachate
was recycled to the landfill. Approximately 11,500 people are served by private and public
wells in the vicinity. Groundwater also is used for irrigation. The closest residence is about
200 feet from the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Off-site groundwater is contaminated with phenols and VOCs. On-site leachate
contains VOCs. Touching contaminated leachate and soil on site or drinking
contaminated groundwater could cause adverse health effects to people in the
area.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on source control and
groundwater cleanup.
154
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Source Control: Municipal water lines were hooked up to some residences in
1979 and 1980. In 1979, the State ordered the owner to undertake landfill closure
and to install a leachate collection and treatment system. Phase I of the closure,
completed in 1980, addressed the emergency situation at the northeastern section of the
landfill. Workers built a compacted clay dike and leachate collection system. Phase II
addressed cleanup efforts and closure of the entire area. This phase was completed in 1984
and activities included: installing a leachate cut-off wall of varying depths around the landfill
perimeter; building an underground leachate collection drain; temporarily discharging leachate
into the sewer for treatment at the public wastewater treatment facility; installing a clay cover
to reduce the spread of contaminants; and installing leachate seep collectors to channel liquid
that might pool on the surface of the fill. The leachate is discharged to the Middlesex County
Sewage Authority's Old Bridge Sewage Treatment Plant. In 1991, a fence was constructed to
secure the site, the clay cover was repaired, and a leachate storage tank was built. All source
control cleanup actions have been completed, and currently the site is being maintained to
ensure the effectiveness of the remedy. Approximately 6,000 to 7,000 gallons of leachate are
transported to the treatment plant each day.
Groundwater: The owner conducted a hydrogeologic study in 1987 that was
intended to assess the current and past effects of the landfill on groundwater in
the vicinity. The owner installed a series of monitoring wells and began quarterly
sampling at various sites. The data indicated that an additional hydrogeologic study was
needed to determine off-site contamination. The State also ordered the owner to
decommission the existing leachate lagoon, to replace it with an underground storage tank,
and to install a standby generator to handle leachate collection in case of a power failure.
The owner has written a contingency plan for leachate disposal in case of such an emergency.
These studies are expected to be completed in late 1992, at which time a plan for site
groundwater cleanup will be recommended.
Site Facts: In 1979, the NJDEPE and BFI signed a Consent Order requiring landfill closure
and cleanup measures. A 1986 Administrative Order on Consent between the NJDEPE and
BFI superseded the 1979 order and established post-closure activities.
Environmental Progress
The actions described above to control the sources of contamination have reduced the
potential for exposure to hazardous wastes at the Monroe Township Landfill site while
further investigation into groundwater contamination is taking place.
Site Repository
Jamesburg Public Library, 229 Gatzmer Road, Jamesburgh, NJ 08831
MONROE TOWNSHIP LANDFILL 155 March 1992
-------
MONTCLAIR/
WEST ORANG
RADIUM SITE
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980785653
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Essex County
Montclair and West Orange
The Montclair/West Orange Radium site includes approximately 350 properties on 120 acres
of residential land. The soil at the site is contaminated with radioactive waste materials
suspected to have originated from radium processing facilities located nearby during the early
1900s. Some of the radium-contaminated soil was used as fill in low-lying areas or was mixed
with cement for sidewalks and foundations. This site is similar to the nearby Glen Ridge
Radium site, which also contains radium-contaminated soils from the same sources. More
than 300,000 cubic yards of contaminated material are scattered on private and public lands.
In 1983, the State discovered a number of homes with high levels of radon gas and radon
decay products, as well as excessive levels of indoor and outdoor gamma radiation.
Approximately 350 homes were identified as being affected by this site, and 32,000 people live
within a mile of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 02/14/85
Threats and Contaminants
Soil is contaminated with radium, which decays to radon gas. Some properties on
the site are contaminated with radium and exhibit excessive levels of radon gas and
gamma radiation. Individuals who are exposed to the radium, radon, and radon
decay products may be at risk. Accidental ingestion of soil may cause adverse
health effects.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: emergency actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the soil and structures; groundwater; and the remaining
properties, public areas, and streets.
156
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1983, the EPA installed temporary ventilation systems
to reduce the radon concentrations in 38 homes. In addition, shielding from
gamma radiation was provided in 12 homes. The radon systems were upgraded to
higher efficiency units in 1990 and 1991.
Soil and Structures: In 1989, the EPA selected a remedy to address the most
extensively contaminated properties. This remedy includes: excavating
approximately 41,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and debris at the most
extensively contaminated properties and disposing of them in a licensed facility; installing and
maintaining indoor engineering controls at less contaminated properties; monitoring the site
to ensure the remedy has been effective; and continuing alternative treatment remedies for
future actions at the site. Cleanup designs have been completed for the majority of the
remedies. Construction has been completed on five homes and is due to begin on several
more in 1992.
Groundwater: The EPA is conducting a study to determine whether the
groundwater has become tainted by the contaminated soil. Once the study is
completed, scheduled for late 1993, the EPA will recommend remedies for
Remaining Properties, Public Areas, and Streets: In mid-1990, a remedy
was selected for the cleanup of the remaining properties as well as public areas
and streets. This remedy includes the excavation and off-site disposal of all
radium-contaminated soil from public and private properties. Once the cleanup activities are
completed, the area will be monitored to ensure the remedy has been effective. Design of the
cleanup remedies is underway at the remaining contaminated properties. Cleanup activities
are expected to begin on several properties in 1992.
Site Facts: The EPA continues seeking parties that may be responsible for site
contamination. No conclusive evidence links a potentially responsible party to the
contamination at the site.
Environmental Progress
The emergency actions described above have reduced the potential for exposure to
radioactive contamination in affected homes near the Montclair/West Orange Radium site
while further cleanup efforts and studies are taking place.
MONTCLAIR/WEST ORANGE 157 March 1992
RADIUM SITE
-------
Site Repository
Montclair Public Library, 50 South Fullerton Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07042
March 1992
158
MONTCLAIR/WEST ORANGE
RADIUM SITE
-------
MONTGOMERY
TOWNSHIP HO
DEVELOPMEN
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980654164
EPA REGION 2
Somerset County
Montgomery Township
Site Description
Originally, the 71 homes at the 72-acre Montgomery Township Housing Development site
depended on private wells drawing from the underlying aquifer. In 1978, volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) were detected in the public well of neighboring Rocky Hill. State officials
also sampled the housing development's wells. Results indicated widespread contamination
with various VOCs. Because of their proximity and the similarity of the contaminants present,
it was agreed to address the Montgomery Township Housing Development site and the
Rocky Hill Municipal Well site, also on the NPL, jointly. The area surrounding the site is
wooded and predominantly residential. Beden Brook skirts the northwestern corner of the
site, and the Millstone River bounds it on the east. The site includes not only the 71 homes
in the original development, but six more homes nearby.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Private wells in the housing development contain various VOCs as well as lead.
Drinking or otherwise coming in contact with contaminated water may result in
adverse health effects.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: emergency actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on providing an alternative water supply and cleaning up the groundwater.
159
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1981, the Township of Montgomery connected 20
homes in the housing development to the Elizabethtown Water Company. The
State began a study of the contamination in 1984, and by 1987, had completed an
investigation of the site. A total of 38 residences were hooked up to the Elizabethtown public
water supply before the alternate water supply remedy described below was implemented.
Alternate Water Supply: The EPA selected a remedy for supplying clean water
to the housing development in 1987. This remedy, a continuation of the emergency
actions conducted throughout the 1980s, was started in 1988 and was completed in
1990. It featured extending the Elizabethtown Water Company distribution system already
serving a portion of the housing development to all residents using contaminated or
threatened wells and sealing affected private wells. Extension of the public water supply has
been completed. Sealing of the wells was deferred to the groundwater cleanup phase.
Groundwater: The EPA selected a remedy for cleaning the contaminated
groundwater plume in 1988. This stage of the cleanup covers not only the housing
development areas, but also the Rocky Hill Municipal Wellfield located nearby
and similarly contaminated. The remedy features: extracting contaminated groundwater from
the primary source area; treating it to Federal and State cleanup standards using an air
stripper; reinjecting the cleaned water into the underlying aquifer; connecting additional
residences to the public water supply as needed; sealing private wells and monitoring wells
within the contaminant plume; and starting a groundwater sampling program to monitor the
effectiveness of the cleanup. The State took the lead on design and implementation of the
cleanup activities. Design activities are scheduled for completion in early 1993. Actual
cleanup activities are expected to begin soon after.
Environmental Progress
By connecting residences affected by contaminated groundwater to municipal water supplies,
the potential for exposure to contaminated groundwater has been reduced while final cleanup
activities are taking place at the Montgomery Township Housing Development site.
Site Repository
Somerset County Library, Main Library, North Bridge Street and Vogt Drive,
Bridgewater, NJ 08807
March 1992 160 MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
-------
MYERS PROPE
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980654198
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Hunterdon County
Franklin Township
Other Names:
Elko Chemical Company
Several companies used the 8-acre Myers Property site to manufacture pesticides, beginning
in the early 1940s. The present owner purchased the property in 1971 and is using it as a
residence. When the site was first identified, various drummed chemicals, as well as
uncontained asbestos, were present at the site. Drinking water wells on the property are not
contaminated. Access to the site is restricted by a fence, but people currently live adjacent to
the fenced area. Cakepoulin Creek, a trout production stream, flows next to the site and
drains to the south branch of the Raritan River. Springs surface on the property and flow
into the creek and toward a wetland. Approximately 250 people live within a 1-mile radius of
the site. Area surface water is used for fishing.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
ZEJ
Extensive groundwater contamination has been identified in the aquifer, including
various volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and pesticides. Contaminants have not
migrated to potable wells. Building surfaces are contaminated with pesticides, while
soils are contaminated with pesticides, metals, and dioxin. Pesticides were also
detected in on-site surface spring samples. Part of the adjacent wetland is highly
contaminated. Those living or conducting business on site could come in contact
with or accidentally ingest contaminants. DDT, one of the identified pesticides,
poses a substantial environmental threat.
161
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1984, the EPA removed contaminated material for off-site
disposal, including soil, drummed wastes, asbestos, and debris. In 1987, after
identifying the most contaminated areas, the EPA installed a fence around those
areas to restrict access. Warning signs were posted at the perimeter of the site. These
response actions were completed by 1988.
Entire Site: The EPA completed a study of the nature and extent of
contamination at the site in 1989. Based on the results of this study, the EPA
chose a remedy to address contaminated soil, sediment, buildings, and groundwater
in the shallow aquifer. The remedy also includes an interim cleanup action for contaminated
groundwater in the deeper bedrock aquifer. The cleanup activities consist of excavating soils
and sediments, treating organic-contaminated soil by dechlorination, followed by soil washing
to remove the inorganic contaminants. The treated soils will be backfilled on site. Shallow
groundwater will be extracted, treated on site, and either reinjected into the ground or
discharged into Cakepoulin Creek. The deeper bedrock groundwater also will be extracted,
treated, and discharged as an interim cleanup measure. The effectiveness of the pump and
treat remedy at cleaning up the shallow bedrock groundwater will be evaluated to develop a
final deeper bedrock groundwater cleanup remedy. The groundwater will be periodically
monitored to ensure it does not pose a threat to potable wells in the area. Potential damages
to the wetland resulting from the remedy will be limited. The potentially responsible parties
are expected to begin designing the selected remedy in 1992. The on-site buildings also will be
decontaminated.
Site Facts: In September 1991, the EPA signed a Consent Decree with Atochem North
America, Inc. to clean up site contamination under EPA supervision. Atochem North
America is expected to begin designing the selected remedy in 1992.
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated soil, drummed wastes, asbestos, and debris and the installation
of a fence have reduced the potential for exposure to contaminated materials at the Myers
Property site while further cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Hunterdon County Library, Route 12, Flemington, NJ 08822
March 1992 162 MYERS PROPERTY
-------
NASCOLITE xO^x./X. EPA REGION 2
IMMOOV^LI I L: ^S* ^> X Cumberland County
In the cities of Millville and Vineland
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD002362705
Site Description
From 1953 to 1980, Nascolite Corporation manufactured polymethyl methacrylate (MMA)
sheets, commonly known as plexiglass or acrylic, at this 17 1/2-acre site. The property lies on
Doris Avenue in the cities of Millville and Vineland, in an area zoned residential and
industrial. Approximately 7 acres were used for production; the rest of the site is wooded.
Operators stored waste residues from the distillation of scrap acrylic in buried tanks on the
site. Liquid wastes leaked from the underground tanks into the surrounding soils and
groundwater. In 1980, Nascolite Corporation ceased operations after being cited and fined by
the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) for illegal
discharges. State investigations in 1981 and 1983 disclosed significant concentrations of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soil and groundwater. Inspectors also found more than
one hundred 55-gallon drums and several buried tanks, as well as asbestos in abandoned
buildings on the site. EPA studies in the mid-1980s confirmed the presence of VOCs, acid
and base/neutral extractables, and lead in soil and groundwater. Groundwater contamination
is moving in a southwestern direction. Drinking water wells are situated downgradient of the
site. The population within a 3-mile radius of the site is 20,000. Most people live about a mile
south of the site, but an apartment complex borders the property on the south, and one
home lies within the current site boundaries. There also are several residences near the site
along Doris Avenue, and another residential area within 1/2 mile of the site. The area relies
on public and private wells for drinking supplies; groundwater also is used for irrigation and
for commercial and industrial purposes.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and potential^
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Groundwater and soils are contaminated with MMA, phthalates, lead, and VOCs
including benzene, toluene, and trichloroethylene (TCE). Surface soil samples from
a ditch that was alleged to have received wastes from surface water runoff as well
as soil samples from the northern part of the plant/production area showed high
concentrations of lead. Sampling of the excavated sludge wastes revealed MMA,
phthalates, VOCs, lead, and naphthalene. These buried wastes reportedly were
disposed of on site during plant operations. Nearby residents may be exposed to
chemicals through direct contact with or ingestion of the contaminated soil, sludge,
or groundwater.
163 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the groundwater and cleanup of the soils and buildings.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1981, under State orders, Nascolite Corporation
removed some contaminated soil and on-site drums from the site. In 1987, EPA
workers placed a tarp above the lead-laden northern plant area soil, cleared and
disassembled the tanks, removed remaining drums, disposed of asbestos wastes, and fenced
the site. Solid wastes were landfilled, and liquid wastes were incinerated. In 1989, the
potentially responsible parties extended a water line to residences where drinking water was
threatened, installing taps, water meters, service connections, and fire hydrants. Roadways
were repaved and private lawns were reseeded.
Groundwater Cleanup: The EPA selected a remedy for cleaning up
groundwater in 1988. It features: extracting groundwater and treating it on site,
then reinjecting the cleaned water into the aquifer; performing additional studies
to determine the appropriate cleanup measures for contaminated soils, sediments, buildings,
and wetlands on the site; and providing an alternative water supply for potentially affected
residents. The Army Corps of Engineers initiated the engineering design for this remedy in
1988. In 1990, the design work, along with additional investigations, was subsequently
undertaken by the potentially responsible parties. At the present time, treatability studies are
being conducted on the contaminated groundwater in order to select the most effective and
environmentally sound technology for groundwater treatment. The remedial design work is
scheduled for completion in 1993.
Soils and Buildings: The EPA completed a study of contaminated soils and
buildings on the site in 1991. A remedy was selected in early 1991 which includes
demolition of on-site structures, including asbestos abatement, with appropriate
disposal; excavation and solidification/stabilization of unsaturated and wetlands soil
contaminated above cleanup standards; replacement of solidified material back on site;
restoration of affected wetlands; and monitoring of the remedy to ensure its effectiveness.
Designs of the selected remedy were initiated in 1991 and are expected to be completed in
the spring of 1993.
Site Facts: In September 1987, the EPA sent the property owner a Notice Letter to offer
the opportunity to conduct emergency cleanup actions at the site. The owner declined to
participate in the site cleanup. Additional potentially responsible parties identified by the EPA
have performed cleanup activities at the site. These parties conducted field work and
investigations for groundwater cleanup in late 1991, and are currently designing the cleanup
remedies.
March 1992 164 NASCOLITE CORPORATION
-------
Environmental Progress
Initial cleanup work, including removal and isolation of contaminated soils, disposal of solid
and liquid wastes, construction of a fence, and the provision of an alternate drinking water
supply, has been completed at the Nascolite Corporation site. These actions have eliminated
the immediate threats to the nearby public and the environment while work continues on
designing the groundwater treatment system and the solidification/stabilization process for the
treatment of lead-contaminated soils, sediments, wetlands, and buildings.
Site Repository
Millville Public Library, 210 Buck Street, Millville, NJ 08332
NASCOLITE CORPORATION
165
March 1992
-------
NAVAL AIR
ENGINEERING ^^ " '-*«•«
CENTER
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJ7170023744
Site Description
The Naval Air Engineering Center (NAEC) site covers 7,382 acres and has been used
continuously for various research, maintenance, firefighter training, testing, and disposal
activities conducted by the U.S. Navy since the 1920s. Although the size of the Lakehurst
facility and its operations have changed over the years, its major function always has been
development and testing of weapons systems. On the basis of historical records, aerial
photographs, field inspection, and personnel interviews, the Navy identified 45 potentially
contaminated areas at the NAEC. The 45 areas included landfills, open pits, unlined lagoons,
and drainage ditches, several of which are near freshwater wetlands. The Navy reports that
fuels, oils, metals, solvents, and various other organic compounds were disposed of on the
NAEC property. In 1988, the EPA and the NAEC agreed that 42 areas at the facility should
be subject to further investigation. Fort Dix Military Reservation, agricultural lands,
woodlands, Lakehurst Borough, and a State wildlife refuge area are adjacent to the site. The
NAEC and the surrounding area are located within the Pinelands National Reserve. The
facility makes up a major portion of the Toms River drainage basin, and several headwater
tributaries originate on site, including Manapaqua Brook, Obhanan Ridgeway Branch, Harris
Branch, and North Ruckels Branch. Several ponds, both natural and excavated, are on the
site. The NAEC employs 4,800 people, and 1,370 people live on base. Most of these residents
are trainees who leave after about 6 months. Water supplies within a 3-mile radius of the site
are from public wells; the system serves approximately 7,100 people. The closest well is about
200 feet from the site. Monitoring has not detected any well contamination. Local surface
water is used for recreation and irrigation.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 09/18/85
Federal actions. Final Date: (J7/22/87
166 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and soil sampling has revealed the presence of metals and other
inorganics, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene and
trichloroethylene (TCE), phenols, and petroleum hydrocarbons. Polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) have also been detected in soil. Some stream sediments show
significant levels of heavy metals such as chromium, lead, mercury, and nickel, and
petroleum hydrocarbons above background levels. Those who come in direct
contact with or accidentally ingest contaminated groundwater, sediments, soil, or
surface water may suffer adverse health effects. An extensive, environmentally
sensitive pineland preserve, supporting wildlife habitat and serving recreational and
agricultural purposes, surrounds the site and could be subject to pollution from
contaminated runoff.
Cleanup Approach
The site currently is being addressed in eight long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup
of various areas of contamination across the site. Additional remedial phases continue to be
added, based on results of the ongoing studies.
Response Action Status
Area C: A study initiated in 1988 showed groundwater and soil contamination in
Area C, once the location of a fire training area and a fuel tank farm. In 1991,
the EPA and the Navy agreed on pumping and treating the contaminated
groundwater as an interim cleanup measure. Design of the treatment system was completed
and actual cleanup activities initiated in 1991. The groundwater pump and treat system is
expected to be operational in 1994.
Area H: Engine catapult test tracks, which contaminated the groundwater, used to
be located in Area H. In 1991, the EPA and the Navy agreed to pump and treat
contaminated groundwater as an interim cleanup measure. The cleanup design
was completed in the fall of 1991; the system is expected to be operational in mid-1992. A
final set of cleanup actions for this area will be chosen in 1993. Other contamination will be
addressed in future agreements.
Nine Areas: Based on an investigation initiated in 1988, the NAEC and the EPA
concluded in 1991 that no further action is needed at Areas 15, 18, 23, 26, 27, 30,
34, 40 and Area L. Contamination in these areas does not exceed State or
Federal health and safety standards.
NAVAL AIR ENGINEERING CENTER 167 March 1992
-------
Area 28: In 1990, the Navy completed an investigation into the nature and extent
of contamination of the groundwater in Area 28, an area containing above- and
below-ground storage tanks. Contaminated soil was removed by the NAEC and
taken to a hazardous waste disposal facility in the spring of 1991. Also in 1991, the EPA
agreed to the NAEC's proposal for pumping and treating groundwater at Area 28 as an
interim cleanup action. Design of the system was completed in 1991. The system is expected
to be operational in late 1992.
Areas A and B: In 1990, the Navy completed an investigation of groundwater
contaminated with petroleum and solvents in Areas A and B. The EPA selected
an interim remedy for cleanup of the groundwater which features a groundwater
pump and treat system. Design of the system was completed in mid-1992. Cleanup
operations are expected to begin in early 1993.
Areas 5, 19, and 21: An investigation conducted by the Navy in 1990 detected
contamination of the soils of these three areas. The NAEC removed
contaminated soils in the spring of 1991. After further sampling, the EPA and the
NAEC concluded that no further action is needed as the cleanup actions already taken have
reduced contamination to within safety levels.
Area 44: A 1990 study conducted by the Navy showed significant PCB-
contamination in the soil of Area 44. Contaminated soils were removed by the
NAEC in the spring of 1991. Subsequent sampling indicated contamination had
been reduced to within safety levels. In 1991, the EPA and the NAEC decided that no
further action is needed at Area 44.
Additional Areas: The Navy is conducting additional investigations to determine
the nature and extent of contamination at 30 additional areas. The investigation
report is expected to divide and prioritize the areas into several additional cleanup
groups for selection of appropriate remedies. All studies and the final cleanup remedy for all
areas, except those now undergoing groundwater cleanup, are expected to be completed in
mid-1993. Final cleanup remedies will be selected if needed for the groundwater sites once
interim actions are completed.
Site Facts: The NAEC is participating in the Installation Restoration Program, a specially
funded program established by the Department of Defense (DOD) in 1978 to identify,
investigate, and control the migration of hazardous contaminants at military and other DOD
facilities. Under an Interagency Agreement with the EPA, the Navy has agreed to deadlines,
timetables, and EPA review of decisions involving cleanup technologies.
March 1992 168 NAVAL AIR ENGINEERING CENTER
-------
Environmental Progress
The Navy is conducting additional studies to determine final cleanup strategies and is
beginning to conduct cleanup activities at the Naval Air Engineering Center site. While these
investigations and cleanup activities are underway, the EPA has determined that the site does
not pose an imminent threat to the surrounding communities or the environment.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
NAVAL AIR ENGINEERING CENTER
169
March 1992
-------
NAVAL WEAPONS
STATION EARL
/CITC A\ X X"~"~"W J /Wi Other Names:
^Ol I I- My \X ^N^y^^l Earle Naval Weapons Station
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJ0170022172
Site Description
The Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A) covers 11,134 acres in Colts Neck. Since the early
1940s, the U.S. Navy has handled, stored, and renovated munitions at the station. These
operations involve preserving and maintaining ammunition, missile components, and
explosives. The station also has conducted activities unrelated to weaponry, such as
radiological operations, materials storage, and waste disposal processes. The site encompasses
numerous waste areas identified by the Navy; 44 of the waste areas are being studied for
cleanup activities as part of this site, and two are being licensed under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Wastes generated include weapons materials, grit
and paint, paint scrapings, solvent and paint sludges, lead bullets from small arms ranges, and
metals including lead, zinc, and titanium. There was a spill of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) in one area; contaminated soil was removed off site for disposal. The area lies over
six hydraulically connected aquifers. About 300 people are served by surface water within 3
miles downstream of contaminated areas of the site; a water supply intake lies 2 miles
downriver. Approximately 1,900 residents live within a 3-mile radius of the station, and there
are 500 homes on the base. An estimated 320 private and municipal wells serve 1,200 people
within a 3-mile radius; groundwater also is used for irrigation. Local surface water is used for
recreation and also for crop irrigation. The headwaters and drainage basins of three major
Coastal Plain rivers, the Swimming, the Manasquan, and the Shark, are present on the Main
Base.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 10/15/84
Federal actions. Final Date: 08/30/90
170 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater, surface water, sediments, and soils are suspected to contain lead,
zinc, and titanium. Those who come in direct contact with or accidentally ingest
contaminants could suffer adverse health effects. Since the facility is an active
munitions storage site, public access is restricted, although hazardous areas may
not be off-limits to base personnel.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three long-term remedial phases directed at the cleanup of
three distinct groups of waste areas.
Response Action Status
11 Waste Areas: In late 1989, the Navy submitted a plan for investigating 11
waste areas to the EPA. These investigations began in 1991 and are exploring the
nature and extent of contamination in 11 separate areas of the site where
contamination is suspected in the groundwater, soil, and sediment. The Navy has installed
groundwater monitoring wells and has performed soil, sediment, and groundwater sampling.
The EPA is expected to choose a cleanup approach in 1994.
16 Waste Areas: The Navy submitted a plan in spring 1991 for an investigation
of the nature and extent of contamination and to identify cleanup alternatives at
16 other waste areas. Preliminary field work began in mid-1992, and is scheduled t
be completed in 1995.
17 Waste Areas: Seventeen additional areas of contamination were recently
discovered through aerial photographs. Investigations into the nature and extent
of contamination in these 17 ares will lead to the selection of cleanup actions.
Site Facts: The Naval Weapons Station Earle is participating in the Installation Restoration
Program, a specially funded program established by the Department of Defense (DOD) in
1978 to identify, investigate, and control the migration of hazardous contaminants at military
and other DOD facilities.
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION EARLE (SITE A) 171 March 1992
-------
Environmental Progress
The Navy is conducting investigations to identify cleanup strategies for the 44 areas of
contamination. The two other areas will be addressed under RCRA guidelines. The EPA has
determined that the Naval Weapons Station Earle site does not pose an imminent threat to
the surrounding population or the environment while investigations leading to the selection of
final cleanup remedies are taking place.
Site Repository
Monmouth County Library, Colts Neck Branch Library, 15 Heyers Mill Pond,
Colts Neck, NJ 07722
March 1992
172
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION EARLE (SITE A)
-------
NL INDUSTRIES,
NEW JERSEY \1X \ Pedricktown
EPA ID# NJD061843249
Other Names:
National Smelting of New Jersey
Site Description
The 46-acre NL Industries site is a former secondary lead smelting facility that was operated
by NL Industries, Inc. from 1972 to 1982 off Penns Grove-Pedricktown Road. In 1983, the
site was sold to National Smelting of New Jersey, Inc., which operated it until 1984. During
its years of operation, the company recycled lead from spent automotive batteries and
separated the plastic from the rubber casings. After the rubber and plastic were separated,
the plastic was reprocessed, and the rubber was placed in a membrane-lined landfill. The
landfill contains process wastes, including slag and rubber materials from the batteries and
contaminated soils. Railroad tracks run through the center of the site. There are two streams
near the site, and a marshy area on site. The site is located in a rural area, with
approximately 2,500 people living within 3 miles of the site boundary. The Cape May aquifer
underlies the site and serves as a source of drinking water, crop irrigation, and process water.
Most of the area residents are served by municipal water wells, although some nearby homes
rely solely on private wells. Testing conducted in 1987 and 1991 indicated that these private
wells are within drinking water standards. The Delaware River is approximately 1 1/2 miles
from the site.
_.x _ ...... „, . . . , . ,, . t. , NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
173 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and soils are contaminated with heavy metals, especially lead and
cadmium. Sampling of on-site and off-site areas and two nearby streams has
identified elevated levels of lead in soils, groundwater, surface water, and stream
sediments. Testing of nearby residential wells indicates that the water is safe for
drinking and household use; however, the migration of contaminants in the
groundwater may threaten these wells in the future. Moreover, individuals may be
exposed to health risks if contaminated soils, surface water, or sediments in and
around the site are accidentally ingested.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: initial actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of surface water, groundwater, soils, and sediments; and cleanup of
ponded water, slag piles, building structures, and debris.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1989 and 1990, the EPA restricted access to the site by
installing a fence; temporarily capping the on-site slag piles to prevent the
migration of contaminants, removing over 40,000 pounds of the most hazardous
materials at the site for recycling or proper disposal; removing 2,200 empty steel drums for
recycling, emptying on-site containers holding materials that potentially could be released, and
storing the materials in covered areas; and removing copper wire and other items of value to
discourage trespassing.
Surface Water, Groundwater, Soils, and Sediments: NL Industries, Inc.,
under EPA monitoring, is investigating the nature and extent of contamination at
the site and is evaluating various cleanup alternatives. The first phase of the
investigation included the installation of on-site monitoring wells; the sampling of on-site and
selected off-site residential wells; and sampling of surface water, soil, sediment, slag and waste
materials. The second phase of the investigation included additional groundwater, surface
water, and sediment sampling to further characterize the nature and extent of contamination
at the site. Field work has been completed and is undergoing EPA review. The EPA is
expected to designate cleanup technologies in late 1992.
March 1992 174 NL INDUSTRIES
-------
Ponded Water, Slag Piles, Building Structures, and Debris: In 1991, the
EPA completed a focused investigation to identify and evaluate cleanup
alternatives for further stabilizing of the site. The selected remedy features
solidification/stabilization and on-site placement of the slag materials; decontamination and
off-site treatment and disposal of debris and contaminated surfaces; off-site treatment and
disposal of the ponded water and sediments; and monitoring, as appropriate, of the remedy to
ensure its effectiveness. In addition, any materials that can be recycled in a safe and cost-
effective manner may be recycled. In 1992, the EPA decided that slag would be treated and
disposed of off site. Designs of the remedy are expected to begin in late 1992, with actual
cleanup activities scheduled to begin soon after.
Site Facts: In 1982, the State issued an Administrative Order on Consent requiring NL
Industries, Inc. to clean up the site, conduct groundwater monitoring, and install a
groundwater abatement system. The Order was amended in 1983 to reflect the purchase of
the site by National Smelting of New Jersey. National Smelting and its parent corporations
filed for bankruptcy in 1984. In 1985, the responsibility for cleanup of the site was transferred
from the State to the EPA. In 1986, NL Industries, Inc. signed a Consent Order with the
EPA under which the company agreed to investigate the site. In 1992, the EPA issued a
Unilateral Order for NL Industries, Inc. to clean up the ponded water, slag piles, building
structures, and debris.
Environmental Progress
Access restrictions and initial removal activities have reduced the threat of exposure to
hazardous materials at the NL Industries site while investigations leading to selection of final
cleanup remedies taking place and cleanup activities are being planned.
Site Repository
Penns Grove-Carney's Point Library, South Broad Street, Penns Grove, NJ 08069
NL INDUSTRIES 175 March 1992
-------
Site Description
PEPE FIELD EPAM REGION 2
N EW J ERSEY /4^iL>A Town of Boonton
EPA ID# NJD980529598
Pepe Field covers approximately 3 acres in a marshy area. The site was used by E.F. Drew
Co. as a landfill from the 1920s until 1950. The company disposed of unknown quantities of
processing waste from the manufacture of edible oils and cleansing and soap products for
household and industrial use. From 1950 until the mid-1960s, the site remained an open,
unused area until the Town of Boonton purchased the property. During the mid-1960s, the
Town filled and covered the site with up to 10 feet of soil in preparation for the construction
of a recreational facility. This facility included tennis courts, a baseball field, a playground
area, and a refreshment stand. In 1969, the Town implemented an odor abatement plan for
the area, which consisted of a 14-foot gravel curtain drain extending 150 feet around the site,
with a sump for leachate collection and treatment with hydrogen peroxide. The pumphouse
discharges into a culvert that ultimately discharges into the Rockaway River, upstream of the
Jersey City Reservoir, a potable water source. Presently, the recreation field is inactive and is
enclosed by a 4-foot chain-link fence. The area around the site is mainly suburban.
Approximately 90,000 people within a 3-mile radius of the site depend primarily on
groundwater for drinking purposes.
o-* r> -1.-I-* TT-- • • u • AA A u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through proposed Date-12/30/82
Federal and State actions. Final Date. Q9/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater and soils are contaminated with the heavy metals arsenic,
barium, cadmium, lead, and mercury. The soil also is contaminated with volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). Metals and VOCs are contaminating the surface
water. Accidental ingestion of the contaminated groundwater, surface water, or soil
could pose a health hazard to individuals. Field investigations showed that
concentrations of combustible gases are often present on the site.
176 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The State plans to clean up the site in compliance with New Jersey's
regulations governing closure and post-closure of sanitary landfills. The cleanup
will include maintaining a site cover; installing a landfill gas collection and
treatment system; upgrading and maintaining a leachate collection and treatment system; and
monitoring the groundwater, leachate, and off-site soil gas. The State began the design of
these remedies in 1991. However, the State transferred the lead back to the EPA in order to
expedite the design process. This remedy is expected to be completed by the end of 1993.
Environmental Progress
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, with EPA assistance,
has determined that Pepe Field does not present an imminent threat to the surrounding
community or the environment while the design of the final remedies is being completed.
Site Repository
Boonton Holmes Library, 621 Main Street, Boonton Town, NJ 07005
PEPE FIELD
177
March 1992
-------
PICATINNY
ARSENAL
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJ3210020704
Site Description
The Picatinny Arsenal site covers 6,491 acres in Morris County. The arsenal has been in
operation for over 100 years, and was once a major source of ammunitions in wartime.
Currently, its primary mission is research, development, and pilot plant production of
explosives and propellants for the Army. At least 156 potentially hazardous locations exist on
the site, according to a 1991 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers report. They include areas used
for testing rocket fuels, munitions, and propellants; areas where chemicals and shells were
buried; surface impoundments; landfills; drum storage areas; and a sludge bed. The arsenal's
6,400 employees obtain their drinking water from three on-site wells, two of which have been
found to have trace amounts of an explosive compound. The surrounding areas are suburban,
as well as summer vacation areas. There are several homes that depend on private wells for
drinking water located at the southern end of the facility. The Army and the State have
sampled the wells and discovered low levels of an explosive compound in three residences.
These residences are receiving bottled water from the Army. Lake Denmark and Picatinny
Lake, which are on the base, are used for recreational activities.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions. Final Date: 02/21/90
Threats and Contaminants
Monitoring wells and soils adjacent to unlined lagoons, which until 1981 held
wastewater from metal plating and etching facilities, are contaminated with volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
and an organic pesticide were found in the sediments of the Green Pond Brook. In
1982, the brook was dredged, and the materials were piled nearby. Site studies
have found metals, explosives, and trace amounts of dioxin in a defined area;
access to that area has been restricted. The contaminated groundwater, soil, and
sediments could pose a health hazard if accidentally ingested. Contaminated
groundwater has apparently migrated off site at the southern boundary where low
levels of explosive compounds have been found in private wells. In addition, the
contaminants from the site could pollute the waters of Green Pond Brook, Lake
Denmark, and Picatinny Lake.
178 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in four long-term remedial phases directed at cleanup of the
Building 24 Area, Building 95 Area, the Burning Ground Areas, and the remaining areas of
contamination discovered during the 1989 site investigation.
Response Action Status
Building 24 Area: In 1989, the Army selected the following remedies for
preventing VOC-contaminated groundwater from discharging into Green Pond
Brook: extracting contaminated groundwater; installing a pre-treatment system for
the removal of metals and solids; air stripping to remove VOCs from the groundwater;
filtering to remove VOCs from the air stripper exhaust and additional VOCs from the air
stripper effluent; discharging treated water via a holding tank and piping it to Green Pond
Brook; operating and maintaining the system; and monitoring the effluent. The Army
completed the design of the remedies in 1990. Construction of the groundwater remedy was
completed in late 1991. The pump and treat system has remained idle pending further
studies to satisfy concerns of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy (NJDEPE). In addition to the pump and treatment system, the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) will conduct a field test to determine whether bioremediaton of VOC-
contaminated soils above the groundwater table is feasible. Cleanup of soils associated with
the Building 24 Area is being addressed under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA).
Building 95 Area: Two unlined sand filter lagoons received treated wastewater
from a metal plating and etching operation in Building 95. The Army is conducting
a study to determine the extent and the nature of contamination. The study is
expected to be completed in late 1992, when cleanup methods will be chosen. Removal of
contaminated soils and piping of the lagoons is scheduled to begin under RCRA program
authority in 1992.
Burning Ground Area: Contaminated explosive sludge and sediment from
manufacturing processes are sent to the burning grounds to be incinerated in pans,
which were formerly on ground surface. The Army is investigating this area of the
site to determine the nature and extent of contamination in soil, groundwater, surface water,
and sediment. This study is expected to be completed in 1995.
Remaining Areas: A site-wide investigation work plan was completed for the 156
remaining areas of contamination in 1991. This plan prioritizes the areas for
investigation and potential cleanup. To facilitate this process, these 156 areas have
been divided into three phases. The work plan for the first phase is expected to be completed
by mid-1992; the remaining work plans are expected to follow 10 months after the first phase
work plan is approved. The first phase will investigate off-site well contamination.
PICATINNY ARSENAL 179 March 1992
-------
Site Facts: Picatinny Arsenal is participating in the Installation Restoration Program, a
specially funded program established by the Department of Defense (DOD) in 1978 to
identify, investigate, and control the migration of hazardous contaminants at military and
other DOD facilities. An Interagency Agreement was signed by the Army and the EPA in
May 1991.
Environmental Progress
The groundwater cleanup rerriedy has been constructed and will be operational once the
NJDEPE issues a discharge permit. While further investigations leading to the selection of
final remedies for the remaining contaminated areas are being conducted at the Picatinny
Arsenal site, the EPA has determined that there is no immediate danger to the nearby
residents or the environment.
Site Repository
Office of Environmental Affairs, SMCRA-EA, U.S. Army Armament Research,
Development, and Engineering Center, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806
March 1992
180
PICATINNY ARSENAL
-------
PIJAKFARM ^A f "2S12
NEW JERSEY V
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is polluted with the volatile organic compound (VOC) benzene
and phthalates, a plastics by-product. The sediments and surface waters are
contaminated with VOCs and the pesticide DDT. Groundwater is contaminated
near the ravine that discharges to Crosswicks Creek and thereby contributes to
sediment and surface water contamination. Soil contaminants include the VOC
xylene, organic acids, and low concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
Accidentally ingesting or inhaling airborne dust from DDT-contaminated
sediments, drinking the polluted groundwater, or being exposed to the
contaminated creek during recreational activities could pose a health threat. The
site lies on a flood plain, and if flooding occurs, contamination could migrate from
the site. The pollutants may seep deeper into the groundwater, causing further
sediment and surface water contamination.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: Based on the results of the site investigation, the EPA selected the
following methods for cleanup of the site: removal and off-site disposal of all
drums and lab packs at a federally approved disposal facility; excavation and
off-site disposal of visibly contaminated soil at a federally approved disposal facility; pumping
and removal of contaminated groundwater, as necessary, during excavation; monitoring of
on-site wells annually for a five-year period; and sediment control during excavation and
sampling efforts. The party potentially responsible for the site contamination, under State
monitoring, completed the removal and disposal of on-site contaminated drums, lab packs,
and soil to an approved facility in late 1990. Monitoring of on-site wells will be continued for
an additional two years to ensure that groundwater contamination has been eliminated.
Other cleanup actions are scheduled to take place in late 1992 to address residual soil
contamination.
Site Facts: An Administrative Order on Consent between Morton Thiokol and the New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) was signed in 1985.
The EPA filed a suit against Morton Thiokol in December 1986 to recover costs that had
been spent thus far in the cleanup process and reached a settlement in 1990.
March 1992 182 PIJAK FARM
-------
Environmental Progress
All contaminated surface materials and soils have been removed from the site and were
transported to an EPA-approved disposal facility. All cleanup goals have been met, and the
Pijak Farm site will be closely monitored to assure the effectiveness of these remedies.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
PIJAK FARM
183
March 1992
-------
PJP LANDFILL
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505648
EPA REGION 2
Hudson County
Jersey City
Other Names:
Pulaski Skyway
Site Description
The PJP Landfill covers 87 acres in Jersey City. The landfill has a history of underground
fires. The site may have been used as early as 1968 to dispose of an unknown quantity of
chemical and industrial wastes. The State certified the landfill to receive solid wastes in 1971.
The site is presently closed and fenced. Approximately 11,900 people reside within a 1-mile
radius of the site. The closest residence is within 1,000 feet of the site. A high-rise apartment
complex and a park are within 1/2 mile. The site is bordered by the Hackensack River on the
west. The river is used for boating and for commercial shipping.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater in the vicinity of the site is contaminated with the heavy metal
chromium, phenols, various pesticides, and volatile organic chemicals (VOCs). The
leachate from the site is contaminated with VOCs including benzene and
chlorobenzene and the heavy metal lead. Potential health risks are possible from
the accidental ingestion of contaminated groundwater and leachate. Direct contact
with the contaminants also poses a potential health threat. Because it is used for
recreational boating, pollution in the Hackensack River could present a health
threat.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
directed at cleanup of the entire site.
184
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Major excavation work and capping of the landfill were
conducted by the State in 1985 to extinguish the fires. In addition, a gas venting
system was installed to prevent the buildup of gases under the landfill surface.
Entire Site: The State began an investigation to determine the nature and extent
of contamination and to identify alternatives for cleanup. The first phase of the
site investigation, which included field sampling, was completed in 1991. Additional
studies may be required before the State can select a final cleanup remedy.
Environmental Progress
Initial actions to extinguish the underground fires and the installation of a gas venting system
have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous contaminants at the site. The State
currently is conducting an investigation that will lead to the selection of final cleanup
remedies for the PJP Landfill site. The EPA has determined that while these investigations
are ongoing, the site does not pose an imminent threat to the surrounding communities or
the environment.
Site Repository
Jersey City Public Library, Five Corners Branch, 678 Newark Avenue, Jersey City, NJ 07306
PJP LANDFILL
185
March 1992
-------
POHATCONG VALL
GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD981179047
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Warren County
Washington and Franklin Townships
Other Names:
Brass Castle-Broadway
ew Jersey Water Company
gton Borough Well Contamination
The Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination site involves the contamination of the Kittatinny
Limestone Aquifer underlying the Pohatcong Valley. The shallow aquifer serves as the sole source of
drinking water for public and private wells in the area. The site includes those portions of Franklin
Township, Washington Township, and Washington Borough lying in the valley and encompasses
approximately 5,600 acres. Pohatcong Creek is the primary surface water drainage for the valley. The
creek meanders through the valley in the direction of the Delaware River. Analyses of two public
water supply wells in 1978 and 1979 revealed high levels of tetrachloroethylene, prompting the
closing of one well and the installation of a carbon filtration system at the other. In 1984 and 1985,
the Warren County Health Department identified a number of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
in 79 private wells throughout the valley. Approximately 12,000 people obtain drinking water from
public and private wells within 3 miles of the site. The Kittatinny Limestone Aquifer serves as the
sole source of drinking water for both private and public wells in the area.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and County actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 03/31/89
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is polluted with various VOCs. The Pohatcong Valley residents
are currently using a new potable water supply.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: an immediate action and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
186
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Action: In cases where the drinking water exceeded public health safety
standards, Warren County supplied bottled water to affected residences. In 1988, the
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy hooked up affected
Entire Site: The EPA has begun an extensive investigation to determine the nature and
extent of groundwater contamination and to identify alternatives for cleanup. The
investigation is scheduled for completion in 1994. Once completed, the EPA will review
the study findings and cleanup alternatives and will select the final cleanup remedy.
Environmental Progress
The provision of a safe drinking water supply has eliminated the potential of exposure to hazardous
substances in the drinking water and will continue to protect the households near the Pohatcong
Valley Groundwater Contamination site until investigation activities are completed and groundwater
resources are returned to safety standards.
Site Repository
Washington Borough Municipal Building, 100 Belvidere Avenue, Washington, NJ 07882
POHATCONG VALLEY
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
187
March 1992
-------
POMONA OA
RESIDENTIAL
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980769350
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Atlantic County
Galloway Township
The Pomona Oaks Residential Wells site provides well service to about 200 single-family
homes in a rural residential area of Galloway Township. The residential lots range in size
from 1/4 to 1/2 acre and the wells are 50 to 60 feet deep. Initially, nearly all of the 200
homes in the residential area relied upon private wells as the sole source of drinking water. In
1982, residents complained to the State about a foul taste and odor in their drinking water.
Subsequent sampling showed the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the
water, which resulted in bottled water being provided to all of the affected area residents. By
1985, all Pomona Oaks subdivision residences were connected to the nearby Absecon water
supply. A new primary water well for the community was designed and constructed by the
State and is now operative. Existing wells at the site have been sealed. Approximately 8,000
people live within 3 miles of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
Testing for a variety of indoor air contaminants detected the presence of VOCs
including benzene and xylenes, as well as aromatics. The groundwater is
contaminated with VOCs. Actions taken in 1984 and 1989 to replace private wells
with a public water supply and the installation of a new primary well have
eliminated any health threat from contaminated groundwater and the resulting air
contamination.
188
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed through immediate actions; further investigations showed that no
other cleanup actions are required.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1985, the EPA began providing bottled water to area
residents. The local water supplier, New Jersey Water Co., extended water lines,
and the distribution system was installed in 1985 to serve the affected homes.
Existing wells at the site have been sealed. A new primary water well for the community was
designed by the State, and construction was completed in 1988. The well was put in service in
mid-1989.
Groundwater: The EPA began a study into the nature and extent of air and
groundwater contamination at the site in 1986. A report detailing the study results
was issued in 1990. It was determined that no further action is necessary at this
site because contamination levels have fallen below levels requiring cleanup action, and
nearby residents have been provided with safe drinking water. The New Jersey Department
of Environmental Protection and Energy is overseeing groundwater monitoring and
conducting sampling downgradient of the site to ensure there is no threat to the public or the
environment. The EPA put a groundwater monitoring plan in place in late 1992. Sampling
results have shown that groundwater remains within federal standards.
Environmental Progress
By providing an alternate safe drinking water source to the residents of the Pomona Oaks
subdivision, the possibility of exposure to polluted water has been eliminated. The
investigations into the extent of the contamination have been completed, and it was
determined that the site no longer poses a threat to the surrounding community or the
environment. The EPA will continue to monitor conditions at the site and report the results
to the public.
Site Repository
Galloway Township Public Library, 30 West Jim Leeds Road, Pomona, NJ 08240
POMONA OAKS RESIDENTIAL WELLS
189
March 1992
-------
PRICE LANDF
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD070281175
EPA REGION 2
Atlantic County
Egg Harbor Township
Other Names:
Price Chem Dump
Price's Pit
Site Description
The 26-acre Price Landfill site is located in Egg Harbor Township. The site originally was a
sand and gravel excavation operation that closed in 1968. Beginning in 1971, the Price
landfilling operation began to accept a combination of both drummed and bulk liquid wastes.
Initial listings of wastes consisted of industrial chemicals, sludges, oil, grease, septic tank
wastes, and sewer wastes. Tank trucks emptied bulk waste into the pit, and others dumped
punctured and unpunctured drums. Chemical waste disposal ended in late 1972, sludge
disposal in the spring of 1973, and municipal waste disposal in 1976. During its operation, it is
estimated that over 9 million gallons of chemical waste were disposed of at the site.
Groundwater in the area is seriously contaminated. The drinking water supply for Atlantic
City had been threatened until relocation of the water supply wells took place. Approximately
100 houses are located within 1 1/2 miles of the site, with a total population estimated at 380.
Land use in the immediate area consists of residential properties, small business properties,
sand and gravel excavations, and undeveloped rural lots. There are four sites on the NPL and
three other landfills in the drainage basin feeding Absecon Creek, which runs near the site.
Illegal dumping is still occurring.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with heavy metals including lead and cadmium, and
the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) benzene, chloroform, vinyl chloride, and
methylene chloride. Potential health risks may exist for individuals accidentally
drinking or coming in direct contact with contaminated groundwater. Groundwater
contamination also may threaten Absecon Creek and other nearby creeks.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on wells/plume management/source control and cleanup of the entire site.
190
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA provided drinking water from tank trucks to the
affected residences and, in 1981, 37 affected residences were connected to the
New Jersey Water Company (NJWC) system. To ensure that the contaminant
plume would not reach the Atlantic County Municipal Utilities Authority (ACMUA) public
water supply well field, the EPA and the State of New Jersey constructed an interconnection
with the NJWC System, redeveloped three ACMUA production wells, installed granular
activated carbon filtration units, and implemented a water conservation program.
Wells/Plume Management/Source Control: From 1983 to 1985, the State
replaced and relocated the ACMUA water supply well field and transmission
facilities and conducted additional analysis of the plume management, source
control, and treatment alternatives.
Entire Site: The EPA has selected the following site cleanup actions: (1)
installation of a security fence around the landfill site; (2) installation of
groundwater extraction wells adjacent to the landfill to control the contaminant
source; (3) installation of groundwater extraction wells hydraulically downgradient from the
landfill to stop the contaminant plume; (4) construction of a groundwater/leachate
pre-treatment facility at or near the site; (5) construction of a force main to the ACMUA
interceptor system; (6) extraction of contaminated groundwater followed by pre-treatment
and ultimate disposal and treatment at the ACMUA wastewater treatment plant; (7)
quarterly monitoring of groundwater for approximately 25 years; and (8) construction of a
landfill cap at the conclusion of the groundwater extraction process. The State began design
of the various cleanup alternatives in 1987. Design activities recently were halted when
ACMUA refused to accept wastewater from the on-site treatment facility. The New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) currently is reviewing
alternatives for on-site disposal of the groundwater.
Site Facts: Notice letters were sent to potentially responsible parties in February 1982, and
in January 1987. The EPA, the State of New Jersey, and the ACMUA reached an agreement
with approximately 50 companies and individuals to provide for the payment of part of the
costs of cleaning up the landfill. This sum will remain in an escrow account, subject to the
final negotiation of a judicial Consent Decree.
Environmental Progress
An interceptor system was installed to prevent the migration of the contaminant plume from
the Price Landfill site to the ACMUA water system, and affected residents have been
supplied with a safe drinking water source, thus reducing the potential for exposure to
contaminated groundwater while the site awaits final cleanup actions.
PRICE LANDFILL 191 March 1992
-------
Site Repository
Atlantic City Public Library, 1 North Tennessee Avenue, Atlantic City, NJ 08401
March 1992
192
PRICE LANDFILL
-------
Site Description
RADIATION
TECHNOLOGY IkM^T^Z/ Rockaway Township
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD047684451
Radiation Technology, Inc. (RTI) is located on a 15-acre site close to Lake Denmark in
Rockaway Township. Since 1970, operations on the site have included radiation sterilization,
production of architectural products, and production and finishing of hardwood flooring.
Radiation sterilization is the only activity currently performed at the facility. Beginning in
1980, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) and
the Rockaway Township Health Department (RTHD) conducted numerous inspections of the
site. These inspections revealed that the company improperly stored and disposed of waste
drums containing solvents and other organic chemicals. In 1981, the RTHD sampled two RTI
water supply wells. Results indicated that volatile organic compounds (VOCs) had
contaminated the groundwater supplying these wells. They subsequently were condemned by
the New Jersey Department of Health and the NJDEPE and were closed. The area is totally
dependent upon groundwater for drinking supplies. The size of the population within a 2-mile
radius of the site is 20,000. The area around the site is generally rural and light industrial.
The site is immediately northeast of the U.S. Army Picatinny Arsenal facility, which also is on
the NPL. The wooded areas surrounding the site are used for hunting.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 09/08/83
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Final Date: 09/21/84
Groundwater has been contaminated with VOCs including benzene, carbon
tetrachloride, and trichloroethylene (TCE). A surface water stream, originating
from a production well and connected to Lake Denmark, also was found to be
contaminated with VOCs. Lake Denmark and its aquatic life may be threatened
from groundwater and surface water VOC contamination. Potential health risks
may exist for individuals who drink the contaminated well water or come into
direct contact with the contaminated waters.
193 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The State initiated an investigation in 1986 to determine the type and
extent of contamination on the site and to identify alternative technologies for the
cleanup. The majority of the remaining field work involves sampling and analysis of
the monitoring wells. The investigation is expected to be completed in 1993.
Site Facts: On July 6, 1983, the NJDEPE and RTI signed a judicial Consent Order. This
Order required RTI to install groundwater monitoring wells and to collect samples for VOC
analyses to determine the source of the contamination. On March 12, 1987, RTI entered into
an Administrative Order on Consent with the NJDEPE and agreed to pay the cost of an
investigation into the nature and extent of contamination at the site.
Environmental Progress
The investigation leading to the selection of final cleanup technologies is underway. While
these studies are taking place, the EPA has determined that the Radiation Technology, Inc.
site does not pose an imminent threat to the surrounding residents or the environment.
Site Repository
Rockaway Township Public Library, 61 Mount Hope Road, Rockaway Township, NJ 07866
March 1992 194 RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
-------
REICH FARMS >T>>^—v. EPA REGION 2
riCIVsn r/^niVIO <%^5r^^ Ocean County
NEW JERSEY £^r^\ Jr 1milenortheastofTomsRiver
EPA ID* NJD980529713 ^' «-* */
Site Description
The Reich Farms site is an open, relatively flat, sandy area covering approximately 3 acres in
Dover Township. The site is surrounded by commercial facilities and wooded areas. During a
5-month period in 1971, the site, which had been leased from the Reich Farm owners by an
independent waste hauler, was used illegally for the disposal of drums containing organic
solvents, still bottoms, and residues from the manufacturing of organic chemicals, plastics, and
resins. In December 1971, the owners of the property discovered approximately 4,500 drums
containing wastes on a portion of the land they had rented out. These drums bore labels
indicating that they belonged to the Union Carbide Corporation. Trenches into which wastes
were believed to have been dumped also were found. From 1972 to 1974, drums, trench
waste, and contaminated soil were removed from the site by the Union Carbide Corporation.
In addition, contaminated private wells were closed and a zoning ordinance was passed
preventing further groundwater use in the area. Approximately 565 people work or live within
a 1/4-mile radius of the site. The population served by groundwater within a 3-mile radius of
the site is 106,500. The nearest residence is about 1,500 feet southwest of the site. Land use
in the general vicinity of the site is predominantly commercial, residential, and agricultural.
The area overlies the Cohansey aquifer, a major source of drinking water for Dover
Township and the surrounding area. The site is located 1,000 feet from an intermittent
stream draining into the Toms River.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
195 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including
trichloroethylene (TCE). VOCs, including toluene and TCE, were detected in soils
just east of a construction company shop building located on site. The surface soils
on site show no significant contamination; however, hot spots are present in the
subsurface soils. These hot spots are contaminated with both VOCs and
semi-volatile organics. Potential health risks may exist for individuals, especially
on-site workers, who make direct contact with or accidentally ingest the
contaminated soils or groundwater.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
directed at the cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1972, approximately 5,095 drums and trench wastes were
removed. In 1974, about 50 drums and approximately 1,100 cubic yards of
contaminated soil were removed from the site by the Union Carbide Corporation.
Also in 1974, 148 private wells near the Reich Farms site were ordered closed by the Dover
Township Board of Health after sampling of a number of wells indicated the presence of
organic contaminants. A zoning ordinance restricting groundwater use was established in the
area of Reich Farms, based on a recommendation by the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy. Residences in the immediate vicinity of the site are
connected to a permanent alternate water supply.
Entire Site: The remedies selected by the EPA to clean up the site include: the
installation of extraction wells; treatment of extracted groundwater by air stripping
and carbon adsorption; discharge of the treated groundwater into injection wells
upgradient of the site; excavation of approximately 1,100 cubic yards of soil contaminated
with VOCs and treatment in an enhanced volatilization unit; backfilling of the excavated area
with the treated soils; excavation of approximately 900 cubic yards of soil contaminated with
semi-volatile organics and off-site incineration; and off-site disposal of the soil at an
EPA-approved facility and backfilling with clean fill. Under EPA monitoring, the Union
Carbide Corporation is undertaking additional sampling and performing treatability studies on
the chosen soil remedy and is scheduled to complete the technical design in late 1993.
Site Facts: Notification/Information Request Letters were sent to the parties potentially
responsible for the contamination in October 1983. A Consent Decree between the
potentially responsible parties and the EPA was entered in court in March 1990. Under this
decree, the Union Carbide Corporation will perform cleanup activities at the site, and the
property owners will provide access.
March 1992 196 REICH FARMS
-------
Environmental Progress
The removal of drums, wastes, and contaminated soil and the restriction of groundwater use
have reduced the threat of exposure to contaminants at the Reich Farms site. The remedy
selections have been made and reviewed by the EPA. The potentially responsible party has
begun the design of the selected technologies. While these activities are taking place, the
EPA has determined that the site does not pose an imminent threat to the surrounding
residents or the environment.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
REICH FARMS
197
March 1992
-------
RENORA INC >/>>\ REGION 2
riCWVJriM, I nO. -(^/^ Middlesex County
NEW JERSEY fl/£& Edison Township
EPAID# NJD070415005
Site Description
The 1-acre Renora, Inc. site was used for the collection and hauling of waste oil and
hazardous wastes from 1978 to 1982. During its operation, oils and hazardous waste materials
were accepted, stored, blended, and ultimately, placed in drums and abandoned at the site.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) inspection
reports consistently noted lack of site security, poor housekeeping, and leaking drums and
tankers. The NJDEPE detected several minor spills on site in 1978 and subsequently
determined that Renora, Inc. lacked the proper registration to act as a special waste transfer
station. In 1980, the NJDEPE ordered Renora, Inc. to cease all activities and clean up the
site. Subsequent investigation by the NJDEPE showed that, while the company had ceased
operations, it had not begun any efforts to clean up the site. As a result, its license was
revoked. All cleanup activities at the site by the owner ceased in 1980 due to lack of funds.
The site was abandoned in 1982, after more than a year of inactivity. The site presently is
enclosed by a chain-link fence. The site is located in a heavily populated area of Edison
Township. Approximately 2,200 people live in the Bonhantown section of Edison Township.
c-+ D ««^-K-I-* TT, v u AA ALU u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater underlying the site area is contaminated with various heavy metals
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Sediments are contaminated with
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals including cadmium and
zinc. The soil was contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and still is
contaminated with PAHs, VOCs, and heavy metals including zinc and cadmium.
Surface water is contaminated with cadmium and zinc. On-site workers and, to a
lesser extent, area residents could be exposed to site-related contaminants through
direct contact.
198 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on cleanup of the entire site and cleanup of PAH-contaminated soils.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA started removing site contaminants in 1984, and
the potentially responsible parties took over these actions, under EPA oversight,
shortly thereafter. Approximately 1,000 drums, 20 to 30 tankers, truck trailers,
and 200 tons of visibly contaminated soils have been removed from the site.
Entire Site: In 1987, the EPA selected cleanup remedies for contamination at the
site, which include removal of PCB-contaminated soils and placement in an
EPA-approved hazardous waste landfill, on-site treatment of PAH-contaminated
soils using bioremediation, and decontamination of the groundwater by using it as an
irrigation mechanism in the bioremediation. The removal of PCB-contaminated soils was
completed in 1990. Approximately 2,000 cubic yards of soil containing PCBs were excavated
and transported to an off-site federally approved facility. Remaining contaminated soils will
be cleaned up by the potentially responsible parties, under EPA monitoring.
PAH-Contaminated Soils: Additional studies showed bioremediation of the
PAH-contaminated soils to be an ineffective treatment; therefore, new studies are
underway to re-define this contamination and to investigate alternatives for
cleanup. Field work for the additional studies was completed in 1992. Once the investigation
is reviewed, a final cleanup remedy will be selected.
Environmental Progress
The cleanup actions described above have removed the exposed sources of contamination and
have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the Renora, Inc. site.
Continuing actions at the site will reduce soil and groundwater contamination to safe levels.
Site Repository
Edison Main Library, 340 Plainfield Drive, Edison, NJ 08817
RENORA, INC. 199 March 1992
-------
RINGWOOD
MIN ES/LAN DFl / Ringwood Borough
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980529739
Site Description
Magnetite mines were operated on the 500-acre Ringwood Mines/Landfill site as early as the
1700s, and wastes have been disposed of at the site since the 1960s. The site is about 1/2 mile
wide and 1 1/2 miles long and consists of rugged forested areas, open areas overgrown with
vegetation, abandoned mine shafts and surface pits, an inactive landfill, an industrial refuse
disposal area, small surficial dumps, a municipal recycling center, the Ringwood Borough
garage, and about 50 private homes. Two abandoned mines, Peter's Mine and Cannon Mine,
have been filled with garbage over the years. Peter's Mine also contains paint sludges,
solvents, and scrap metal. Several drums have been observed in Cannon Mine. Mining ended
at the site in the early 1900s, and the history of the site is unclear from then until the late
1930s. The site was purchased by the U.S. Government prior to 1940 and later was sold to a
succession of owners. From 1967 until 1974, Ringwood Realty, one of the former owners,
deposited waste products for Ford Motor Company, including car parts, solvents, and paint
sludges, on the ground surface and in abandoned mine shafts. In 1970, Ringwood Realty
donated 290 acres in the southern portion of the site to the Ringwood Solid Waste
Management Authority, which began operating a permitted municipal disposal area in 1972.
The landfill was closed by the State in 1976. Groundwater beneath the site discharges to
surface streams and the Wanaque Reservoir, located 1/2 mile southeast of the on-site sludge
disposal area. The area around the site is primarily residential, with about 50 residences
located on or near disposal areas. Approximately 20 water supply wells draw water from the
bedrock aquifer, which also supplies a few residences and industries in the area.
Approximately 13,000 people live in Ringwood Borough. The Wanaque Reservoir provides
drinking water to about 650,000 people.
o-» o -u-r* TU- v • u • AA AH, u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
200 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Iffl]
Stream sediments are contaminated with the heavy metals cadmium and lead,
while streams on and near the site are contaminated with the volatile organic
compound (VOC) methylene chloride. On-site soils are contaminated with lead.
VOCs and heavy metals have been found in the groundwater. The primary health
concern associated with this site was the risk to those people who accidentally
ingested contaminated soils. The removal of contaminated soil has eliminated the
health threat from direct contact with soil. There is a potential health risk
associated with eating garden-grown foods that were watered with contaminated
groundwater.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: From 1987 to 1988, a potentially responsible party, Ford
International Services, Inc., removed 7,000 cubic yards of surficial paint sludge
containing lead and arsenic from four on-site areas and disposed of it off site.
Entire Site: Cleanup technologies selected to address groundwater, surface water,
soil, and sediment contamination include: sampling of soil, with excavation and
off-site disposal of soil confirmed to be contaminated; backfilling and revegetation
of soil; and groundwater, surface water, and wetlands monitoring. Long-term groundwater
and surface water monitoring has begun at the site and will last a minimum of 30 years.
Groundwater treatment is not needed because area groundwater is not used as a drinking
water source. Also, attenuation of contaminants in the groundwater through natural
biodegradation is expected to reduce levels adequately once the source of contamination is
cleaned up. In early 1990, during soil excavation, 60 drums containing wastes were discovered.
The drums were removed and disposed of off-site. Further testing of the site is currently
underway to determine if any contamination remains. The potentially responsible party, under
EPA supervision, is proceeding with an oversight and maintenance phase for the site. The
EPA anticipates deleting the site from the NPL in 1995.
Site Facts: The EPA issued an Administrative Order to Ford International Services, Inc. to
clean up soil contamination and to eliminate health and environmental risks associated with
the site.
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL 201 March 1992
-------
Environmental Progress
By removing the contaminated soil and drums containing hazardous wastes and disposing of
them off site, the potential for exposure to hazardous materials from the Ringwood
Mines/Landfill site has been virtually eliminated. Since the groundwater is not used as a
drinking water source, it does not pose a threat to any of the surrounding residents.
Continuous monitoring of the site will ensure the safety of public health and the
environment.
Site Repository
Ringwood Library, 145 Sylands Road, Ringwood, NJ 07456
March 1992
202
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL
-------
ROCKAWAY
BOROUGH
WELL FIELD
NEW JERSEY
EPAID* NJD980654115
EPA REGION 2
Morris County
Rockaway Township
Site Description
The Rockaway Borough Well Field site covers a 2-square-mile area and consists of three
municipal water supply wells, which are located in a glacial aquifer designated by the EPA as
the sole source aquifer for Rockaway Borough and the surrounding communities. Eight other
wells previously used for potable water supply by the Borough were abandoned because of
their lack of productivity. In 1980, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in the
municipal wells. The contaminated wells are close to the Rockaway River, which runs through
the center of the Borough. The site is located in a suburban residential setting and is
surrounded by homes, businesses, and municipal property. The Borough of Rockaway's
municipal wells supply potable water to about 11,000 people.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Although thirteen VOCs have been detected in the well water, trichloroethylene
(TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) are the primary contaminants of concern.
Threats to the health of people include exposure to TCE and PCE through
drinking or direct contact with groundwater.
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in four stages: initial actions and three long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the wells, groundwater plume, and additional source areas of the
contamination.
203
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1981, an emergency was declared, and the residents supplied
by the distribution system were advised not to use their tap water for drinking and
cooking. Temporary drinking water supplies were trucked in by the National
Guard. In 1981, the Borough installed an activated carbon water treatment system to reduce
contaminant concentrations.
Wells: Rockaway Borough is maintaining the existing filtration system to ensure
compliance with Safe Drinking Water Act standards. The water is being monitored
by the Borough on a monthly basis since the installation of a carbon water
treatment system. Besides monitoring the water, it was determined in 1986 that no further
actions were necessary to address contamination at the wells.
Groundwater Plume: In 1991, the EPA selected the cleanup action to treat
contaminated groundwater to restore the aquifer. The remedy includes: the
installation of extraction wells; treatment of extracted groundwater by chemical
precipitation and air stripping; reinjection of treated groundwater; and appropriate
environmental monitoring to ensure the effectiveness of the remedy. The design phase for
this remedy is expected to begin in 1993.
Source Control: A subsequent study is expected to begin in late 1992 to further
delineate the nature and extent of the source of contamination. Once this
investigation is completed, the EPA will evaluate the study findings and select a
final cleanup remedy.
Environmental Progress
The installation of a water filtration system has reduced the threat of exposure to
contaminants in drinking water while activities leading to the design of a final cleanup remedy
are being planned.
Site Repository
Rockaway Borough Municipal Complex, 1 East Main Street, Rockaway, NJ 07866
March 1992
204
ROCKAWAY BOROUGH WELL FIELD
-------
ROCKAWAY /^ EPAJ?SN2
TOWNSHIP WELLS ^4*^ Rockaway Township
NEW JERSEY
EPAID#NJD980654214
Site Description
The Rockaway Township Wells site is a 2-square-mile well field area containing a cluster of
three municipal wells within 100 feet of each other. In 1979 and 1980, the wells were found
to contain a variety of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Two gasoline service stations,
freight and transit facilities, and industrial properties are located near the well field.
Groundwater contamination in the area appears to have resulted from several sources,
including the gasoline stations and industrial facilities. Monitoring wells in the area indicated
widespread contamination by chlorinated solvents and fuel components. In 1980, a treatment
system for the combined pumping of the wells was installed and included an air stripping unit
and an activated carbon filtration system. Only two of the three wells currently are in
operation. The two operative wells serve 12,500 people and are located adjacent to White
Meadow Brook, between Green Pond and Ford Roads. The Valley Fill aquifer is the only
water supply source capable of meeting the Township's water demand.
«>•* n -U-I-* TU- • • u • AA A .u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with VOCs including trichloroethylene (TCE).
Inhaling volatilized organics released into indoor air during water use and ingesting
or making direct contact with contaminated water were potential health threats
prior to the installation of the water treatment systems.
205 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a single long-term remedial
phase focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The Shell Oil Company, under EPA and State monitoring,
installed an air stripping system to remove ether contamination from the water.
The Township installed an activated carbon system to remove other volatile
Entire Site: The EPA and the State currently are conducting a study into the
nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site. The study will define
the contaminants of concern and will recommend alternatives for final
groundwater cleanup. The investigation is planned to be completed in late 1992. Once
completed, the EPA will evaluate the study findings and select a final remedy for
groundwater treatment and any other contaminated areas identified in the study.
Environmental Progress
An activated carbon system to remove contaminants has been installed at the Rockaway
Township Water Department, which has proven to be effective in reducing the potential for
residents to be exposed to contaminated groundwater. A study leading to a final remedy
selection for the groundwater contamination currently is taking place.
Site Repository
Rockaway Township Public Library, 61 Mount Hope Road, Rockaway Township, NJ 07866
March 1992
206
ROCKAWAY TOWNSHIP WELLS
-------
HII I /^ EPA REGION 2
HILL ^^AAjN Somerset County
MUNICIPAL ^: ^-^-^ RockyHi"Borough
NEW JERSEY
EPAID#NJD980654156
Site Description
The Rocky Hill Municipal Well site covers 2 acres in Somerset County and consists of two
wells that were constructed in 1936 to supply the residents of the Borough of Rocky Hill with
a source of drinking water. In 1978, the first well was sealed and abandoned because it was
contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE). The second well continued to operate until 1979,
when it was also closed due to high levels of TCE. The well reopened for a short time when
TCE levels declined, only to be closed again in 1982, when contamination levels increased in
the groundwater. The Borough temporarily used a private water supply until an air stripper
could be installed on the municipal well. Studies of the site in 1988 found that a septic tank
in the area was a probable source of the TCE contamination. Approximately 7,200 people
depend on the Rocky Hill Municipal Well as a drinking water resource. The area that
surrounds the site is wooded, and land use is primarily agricultural and residential.
_.. _ ...... „, . .. . , . .. , .. , NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater at the site is contaminated with the heavy metals arsenic and
beryllium; chlordane, a pesticide; and TCE. TCE is the main contaminant at this
site; the presence of other chemicals may be unrelated to it. The contaminated
groundwater is treated before the residents of Rocky Hill receive it. Part of the
Borough of Rocky Hill is located on the State and National registers of historic
places.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
207 March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Entire Site: Following the closure and temporary treatment of the wells, the
State conducted an investigation into alternatives for groundwater cleanup. The
remedy chosen for this site includes: continuing groundwater extraction and
on-site treatment through air stripping and reinjecting the treated water into the ground;
connecting residences still using private well water to the public water supply; and sealing
private water supply wells that are affected and installing wells to monitor the contaminant
plume. Residents using private wells have been connected to alternate water supplies. The
design of the cleanup remedy began in 1989 and is expected to continue until 1993. The EPA
expects to start the cleanup of the contaminated groundwater shortly thereafter.
Environmental Progress
The affected residences have been supplied with an alternate safe drinking water supply,
thereby reducing the potential for residents to be exposed to contaminated groundwater at
the Rocky Hill Municipal Well site. The air stripping treatment system continues to remove
contamination from impacted groundwater and will be operated until safety levels are
achieved.
Site Repository
Somerset County Library, Main Library, North Bridge Street and Vogt Drive, Bridgewater,
NJ 08807
March 1992
208
ROCKY HILL MUNICIPAL WELL
-------
Site Description
ROEBLING
STEEL CO. <^t v Florence
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD073732257 ^fc^/ X I JARSCO
The Roebling Steel Company site occupies 206 acres of a former manufacturing plant for
steel and wire products located next to the Delaware River on 2nd Street in Florence. The
Roebling Steel Company has been producing steel wire and cable at this site for the last 75
years. Fifty-five buildings occupy most of the site and are connected by a series of paved and
unpaved roads. More recently, portions of the site were used for housing polymer reclamation
operations, storing insulating products, refurbishing refrigerated trailers and shipping
containers, and construction equipment storage. The raw materials and waste products that
these operations produced are stored or buried in several on-site locations. The site includes
two inactive sludge lagoons, an abandoned landfill, a 34-acre slag disposal area, soils soaked
with oils and other potentially hazardous materials, tanks and pits containing sludges and
liquids, asbestos pipe insulation, and a network of underground piping. Sporadic vandalism
has occurred since the plant stopped operations; several buildings have been partially
destroyed, a pile of old tires was set on fire, and a building housing a chemical laboratory was
destroyed by fire. The site is next to the Delaware River, and the groundwater under it is
only about 10 feet below the ground surface. Approximately 12,000 people in the area
depend on the groundwater for their drinking water, supplied by private and municipal wells
within 3 miles of the site. The distance from the site to the nearest well is 2,000 feet.
Residents in the area use the Delaware River and a wetland next to the site for recreation.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions. Final Date: Q9/08/83
209 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Buildings on the site contain exposed asbestos and chemical dust. Groundwater
under the site is contaminated with various heavy metals including chromium, lead,
cadmium, nickel, zinc, and copper. River and creek sediments are potentially
contaminated with heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The
soil at the site and an adjacent playground is contaminated with heavy metals
including lead. People on or off site could come into direct contact with hazardous
materials or could accidentally inhale contaminated materials from exposed
asbestos, contaminated soil, process dust in the buildings, and tank and pit
contents. Runoff from precipitation on the site may have contaminated the
Delaware River, which is next to the site.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in four stages: initial actions and three long-term remedial phases
focusing on interim action plans, cleanup of the slag area and Southeast Park, and cleanup of
the remaining site contamination.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Approximately 300 lab pack containers of chemicals were
collected, removed, and properly disposed of by the EPA. Approximately 3,200
full and empty drums were sampled and disposed of at federally permitted
facilities, and 120 cubic yards of crushed and emptied drums were removed to an
EPA-approved hazardous waste landfill. Three pounds of metallic mercury were collected,
repackaged, and sent to a recycling facility for distillation and reuse. Over 35 tons of
baghouse dust were secured with tarps and barriers. One drum of hazardous waste-containing
cyanide was shipped to an approved treatment facility, and 10 compressed gas cylinders were
returned to manufacturers for proper reuse and recycling or were treated on site.
Approximately 3,000 gallons of sulfuric acid and 2,150 gallons of phosphoric acid were
sampled, analyzed, and removed from two large aboveground tanks and sent off site for
reuse; 239,000 pounds of base neutral solids in drums were consolidated and shipped to a
permitted facility. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy
packaged and removed picric acid and other chemicals found in the labs and shipped them to
an approved treatment facility. Exposed asbestos in a potential personnel entry zone was
wrapped and contained.
March 1992 210 ROEBLING STEEL CO.
-------
Interim Action: In 1990, the EPA selected a remedy to address the remaining
high hazard sources of contamination, such as additional drums and tanks,
transformers contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls, baghouse dust and
chemical piles, tires, and contaminated soils from the adjacent playground. The total quantity
of material removed off site for treatment, disposal, and recycling included 263 overpacked
drums and 663 crushed drums; 45,864 gallons of transformer oil and 860,709 pounds of
transformer carcasses; 266,843 gallons of tank liquids and 1,351 tons of tank sludges; 800 tons
of baghouse dust; 251 tons of chemical piles and asbestos; and 126 tons of burnt tires and
261 tons of recyclable tires. This removal action was completed in late 1991.
Slag Area and Southeast Park: In late 1991, remedies were selected to
address the slag area and Southeast Park. The cleanup plan selected for the 34-
acre slag area includes treating the hot spots, and then covering the entire 34-
acre lag area with a soil cover and vegetation. Two areas of concern in the Southeast Park
will be excavated and hazardous materials disposed of off site. The technical designs for the
remedies are now underway. The EPA restricted access to the slag disposal area by installing
a fence. The fence is a temporary measure until the EPA completes the final cleanup of this
area. Cleanup activities are scheduled to begin in mid-1993.
Remaining Contamination: The EPA started to study the site contamination
and options for cleaning up remaining contamination areas in 1984. The study
addresses surface and subsurface soils, surface water, sediments, groundwater, air
quality, buildings, landfills, lagoons, and other remaining contamination sources at the site.
The first phase of this study is expected to be completed in mid-1992.
Environmental Progress
The EPA initiated and carried out numerous waste removal actions at the Roebling Steel
Company site, thereby reducing the potential for exposure to hazardous materials on or off
the site. A fence has been installed to restrict access to areas of the site. Other actions to
remove the contaminated materials at the slag area and Southeast Park are currently being
designed while investigations leading to a final remedy for the remaining contamination at the
site are underway.
Site Repository
Florence Township Public Library, 1350 Hornberger Avenue, Roebling, NJ 08554
ROEBLING STEEL CO. 211 March 1992
-------
SAYREVILLE /-•••* / EPA REGION 2
OMTnCVILLQ £T.:X: /S£^ Middlesex County
LANDFILL > ,^T)
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505754
Site Description
The Sayreville Landfill is an inactive municipal landfill covering approximately 30 acres in a
moderately industrialized area. The site is one of a series of disposal operations located along
the tidal South River. The town owned and operated the site as a municipal landfill beginning
in 1970. It was licensed to receive municipal waste and light industrial waste; however,
hazardous waste allegedly also was disposed of during operations and after closure in 1977.
Part of the site is in a wetland adjacent to the South River. Approximately 67,000 people live
within a 3-mile radius of the site, and the closest residence is located 1/2 mile away. Because
of the tidal influence and the infusion of salt water, private wells in the area are not used.
The Sayreville and Perth Amboy well fields are within 3 miles of the site. Sayreville has not
detected any contamination in its municipal well. There are other municipal wells in the
vicinity, which are tested regularly. These wells draw from aquifers as yet unaffected by the
site.
o-* c, -U-I-. TU- •* • u • .1.1 s u u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
m
Heavy metals including iron and manganese, phenol, the volatile organic
compound (VOC) benzene, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were
detected in on-site groundwater. Iron also was detected in off-site well water. The
VOC toluene and pesticides, including aldrin and endrin were detected in on-site
landfill liquids. Sediments contain toluene and trichloroethylene (TCE). Surface
water was shown to be contaminated with cadmium and lead. Benzene, arsenic,
and chloroform were detected in on-site soils. Groundwater and leachate from the
landfill discharge into the South River; however, due to mixing in the river, the
contamination from the landfill has not been detected in the river waters. The
South River flows into the Raritan River, which already has been condemned for
fishing because of contamination from a source other than this site. Potential risks
may exist for those individuals coming in direct contact with the contaminated
leachate and surface water or those individuals consuming fish or other aquatic life
from the contaminated river.
212 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: initial actions and two long-term remedial phases
directed at cleanup of the entire site, as well as leachate collection and cleanup of river
sediments.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy (NJDEPE), in coordination with the New Jersey Division of Criminal
Justice, excavated and sampled 30 drums from the site in 1982. Additional drums
may exist on the site.
Entire Site: The EPA selected a remedy for cleanup of the site in 1990. The
remedy includes the removal of hazardous waste drums and thermal treatment of
the wastes off site, capping the site, and installing a stormwater control system
and a methane gas collection system. Design of the remedy was initiated later that year.
Cleanup activities will begin once the design of the remedy is completed.
Leachate Collections and River Sediments: Investigations leading to the final
selection of a leachate collection system and cleanup of river sediments have been
underway since late 1990. These investigations are expected to be completed in
1993, at which time a decision on further cleanup work will be made.
Site Facts: The State signed an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with the
potentially responsible parties in 1986 requiring that they fund the investigation to determine
the type and extent of contamination. In late 1991, a second AOC with the potentially
responsible parties was signed, which requires them to perform the cleanup activities at the
site.
Environmental Progress
Initial actions have been completed to remove drums from the surface of the site. The EPA
has determined that the Sayreville Landfill site does not pose an imminent threat to the
surrounding community or the environment while the design of additional cleanup activities is
underway and further studies are being completed.
Site Repository
Sayreville Free Public Library, 1050 Washington Road, Parlin, NJ 08859
SAYREVILLE LANDFILL 213 March 1992
-------
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
CHEMICAL ! ^^r^ Canstadt
PROCESSING
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD070565403
Site Description
The Scientific Chemical Processing site covers 6 acres and is located in a light industrial area
of Carlstadt. This site is a former waste processing facility that accepted various wastes for
recovery and disposal. About 375,000 gallons of hazardous substances were stored on site in
tanks, drums, and tank trailers. The site shut down operations in 1980 in response to a court
order. Some company officials have received fines and jail terms for illegally dumping
hazardous waste. In 1979 to 1980, drums and contaminated soil were removed. The site now
is vacant, except for two small buildings and a roll-off container holding a polychlorinated
biphenyl (PCB) sludge tank. The site is located within a coastal wetlands management area,
bordered on the northeast by Peach Island Creek, a tidal waterway. Local surface water is
used for recreation and industrial water supplies. Three private residences are within a mile
of the site. All nearby businesses and residences are believed to be on public water supplies.
There are 60 wells nearby with 11 possibly used for drinking water purposes. The population
within a 2-mile radius is approximately 14,500.
o-* •-. -U-I-. r^. . . , . ,, , . . NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
On-site groundwater and soil contamination consists of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) including benzene, chloroform, and trichloroethylene (TCE); PCBs;
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) including naphthalene; and heavy metals.
Off-site sediment contamination along Peach Island Creek consists of VOCs,
phenol, PAHs, petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and the pesticide dieldrin.
Surface water contamination in Peach Island Creek consists of VOCs, petroleum
hydrocarbons, and heavy metals including nickel and zinc. The site is fenced on
three sides and bordered by Peach Island Creek on the fourth side, thereby
reducing public access to the site. Potential health risks may exist for those who
come into direct contact with site pollutants, specifically those who accidentally
ingest or touch contaminated soils, surface waters, groundwater, and sediments.
The coastal wetlands also may be threatened by the site contaminants.
214 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in four stages: immediate actions and three long-term remedial
phases focusing on interim cleanup of the on-site groundwater and soil, final cleanup of the
aquifer and off-site groundwater contamination, and final cleanup of the on-site groundwater
and soil.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: To address the immediate threats posed by the
contaminants, Inmar Associates, the property owner, removed 55 tanks and one
tank trailer under New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy supervision between 1985 and 1986. Some delays were caused due to the high PCB
concentrations in one of the tanks.
Interim Cleanup of On-Site Groundwater/Soil: Under EPA monitoring, the
potentially responsible parties began conducting an investigation in 1985 to
determine the type and extent of on-site groundwater and soil contamination. In
1990, the EPA selected an interim remedy for cleanup of the on-site groundwater and soil
which includes construction of a slurry wall, infiltration barrier, and groundwater collection
system to retrieve groundwater for treatment off site. This interim remedy, scheduled for
completion in late 1992, will contain the contamination until a permanent remedy can be
selected. Investigations to identify final cleanup alternatives are ongoing, as described below.
Aquifer and Off-Site Groundwater: The parties potentially responsible for the
contamination began an investigation in 1988, under EPA monitoring, to
determine the type and extent of contamination to the underlying aquifer and
off-site groundwater and to identify alternative technologies for the cleanup. This
investigation is expected to be completed in late 1993.
Final On-Site Groundwater/Soil: In 1993, a subsequent investigation is
expected to begin to identify the contaminants of concern and recommend
effective alternatives for final on-site groundwater and soil cleanup.
Site Facts: A Federal District Court trial resulted in the conviction of three corporate
officials of Scientific Chemical Processing on charges arising out of the disposal of bulk
solvents into the Newark sewer systems and drummed wastes into Lone Pine Landfill. In
1983, the State Court ruled that the site owner/operators are liable for the cleanup and must
submit a cleanup plan by July 1983 or show poverty. In September 1985, the EPA issued an
Administrative Order on Consent to 108 respondents for the performance of an investigation
to determine the type and extent of contamination at the site and to identify alternative
technologies for the cleanup. In October 1985, the EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative
Order to an additional 31 respondents, requiring them to cooperate with the 108 parties and
to participate in the investigation. A civil complaint against Inmar was filed by the United
States in January 1987. The complaint seeks reimbursement for the EPA's oversight costs as
well as penalties for violation of the EPA's Administrative Order. A settlement was reached
in 1988.
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING 215 March 1992
-------
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated tanks and a tank trailer by the owner of the property addressed
immediate threats posed by the Scientific Chemical site. An interim remedy for on-site
groundwater and soil contamination cleanup will reduce migration of the contamination until
final remedies are chosen. Further investigations leading to the selection of final remedies for
the off-site groundwater and aquifer contamination, and on-site groundwater and soil
contamination are being conducted by the parties potentially responsible for the site
contamination.
Site Repository
William E. Dermody Free Public Library, 420 Hackensack Street, Carlstadt, NJ 07072
March 1992
216
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING
-------
SHARKEY LANDFILL/^ **«£.«•2
NEW JERSEY ^ iS^f~& Townships (H Parslppany.Troy Hills
EPA ID* NJD980505762 , /t^~i V , and East Ha"°ver
Other Names:
Sharkey Farm Landfill
Site Description
The Sharkey Landfill site, approximately 90 acres in size, is divided into five separate sections:
the North Fill, South Fill, Northwest Fill (South), Northwest Fill (North), and the Southwest
Fill. The North Fill is a 26-acre island surrounded by branches of the Rockaway River. The
sides of the landfill are steep and contain leachate seeps and erosion gullies. The South Fill
area is bordered by the Rockaway and Whippany Rivers and the Parsippany-Troy Hills
Sewage Treatment Plant. The total area of South Fill, including the sewage treatment plant,
is approximately 64 acres; however, the area containing landfill material consists of about 29
acres out of the 64. The Northwest Fill area is separated by Interstate Route 280 into two
sections totalling about 26 acres. The Southwest Fill is in East Hanover Township and covers
about 9 acres. This fill is bordered by the Whippany River and a river channel. Sharkey
Landfill began operation in 1945, accepting municipal wastes from several surrounding
counties and some hazardous and toxic materials. These materials included more than
100,000 gallons of various volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The landfill also accepted
wastes from sewage treatment plants. There are reports that a chemical manufacturer
disposed of several million gallons of wastewater in the landfill from 1972 to 1974. From 1979
to 1981, refuse was removed from the South Fill portion of the site and disposed of in the
North Fill area because of expansion of the sewage treatment plant. Landfill contaminants
have migrated, and continue to migrate, into the shallow aquifer beneath the site. The
Parsippany-Troy Hills area has a total population of about 50,000. The Towns of Montville
and East Hanover have populations of about 12,000 each. The area to the west and north of
the site is mainly light industrial, although there are scattered residential properties in the
area.
0-* n -U-I-* -ru v • u • AA A^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 12/30/82
Federal and State actions. Final Date: 09/08/83
217 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater contamination beneath the site is a primary concern. On-site
groundwater is contaminated with VOCs including benzene, semi-volatile
compounds, and heavy metals including lead, cadmium, and chromium. Soil is
contaminated with heavy metals. Those who ingest contaminated groundwater may
suffer adverse health effects. The Whippany and Rockaway Rivers are the major
surface waters in the area. Leachate from landfill seeps, surface water runoff from
rainfall, and the undercutting action on the landfill sides may contaminate the
rivers.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The groundwater, surface water, and soil cleanup remedies selected
to address site contamination include: capping of the landfill with a 2-foot clay
cap that conforms to Federal requirements; installation of a venting system for
landfill gases and extraction and treatment of shallow groundwater and leachate; surface
water controls to handle rainfall, storm runoff, and erosion of river banks; installation of
security fencing to restrict site access; and a long-term groundwater monitoring program. The
State, in conjunction with the EPA, is preparing the technical specifications and design for
the cleanup. The design is expected to be completed in 1993.
Environmental Progress
The EPA has selected the final cleanup technologies for the Sharkey Landfill site. While
remedy design activities are taking place, the EPA has determined that the site does not pose
an imminent threat to the surrounding community or the environment.
Site Repository
Morris County Public Library, 30 East Hanover Avenue, Whippany, NJ 07981
March 1992 218 SHARKEY LANDFILL
-------
EPA REGION 2
Gloucester County
NEW JERSEY cA X Boroughof Newfield
EPA ID# NJD002365930
Site Description
The 61-acre Shieldalloy Corp. site houses an active specialty plant that manufactures
chromium alloy products.. Past disposal practices included the release of process wastewater
directly to an unlined lagoon, causing surface water and groundwater contamination. This
resulted in extensive chromium contamination in an area that is totally dependent upon
groundwater for drinking supplies. In 1979, the plant constructed a decontamination plant for
the treatment of chromium-contaminated groundwater. Since 1979, the plant has pumped and
treated the groundwater prior to discharge into the Hudson's Branch Tributary of the
Maurice River. The backwash from the ion-exchange treatment system is placed in three
lined surface impoundments for final treatment. The decontamination system has experienced
numerous operational problems over the years that have caused efforts to contain or remove
the chromium plume to fail. There are slag piles and other wastes, including low-level
radioactive wastes, on site; the site is licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. There
are approximately 56,000 people living within a 2-mile radius of the site. The closest residence
is located less than 1/5 mile away. Private wells are located within a mile, and a municipal
well is within 400 feet of the site. Private and municipal wells in the vicinity of the site have
been shown to be contaminated. Area surface waters are used for swimming and fishing, and
these waters are contaminated.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Both on- and off-site groundwater are contaminated with volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and hexavalent chromium. Soil is contaminated with VOCs
and possibly radionuclides. On-site sludge contamination includes the heavy metal
chromium. The Hudson's Branch Tributary of the Maurice River contains
hexavalent chromium and VOCs including trichloroethylene (TCE). There is a risk
from radionuclides to on-site workers if they are not properly protected. Off-site
threats to public health include drinking or coming in direct contact with
groundwater and surface water, inhaling contaminated air particles, and eating
contaminated fish from the nearby surface waters.
219 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: initial actions and two long-term remedial phases
focusing on cleanup of the groundwater plume and contamination source control.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The potentially responsible party has been pumping and treating
chromium-contaminated groundwater since 1979. The party also designed and
built a new treatment facility. However, the facility is not working properly, and
Shieldalloy still is performing studies to upgrade the groundwater treatment system. The party
also replaced lined underground storage tanks with aboveground tanks.
Groundwater Plume: The potentially responsible party completed a preliminary
study of the chromium contaminant plume. During this initial study, VOC
contamination was detected in groundwater both on and off site. The extent of the
VOC and chromium contamination currently is being evaluated, and this study is expected to
be completed in 1992.
Source Control: The potentially responsible party and the State, under EPA
monitoring, currently are conducting a study into the nature and extent of soil and
sludge contamination at the site. The study will define the contaminants of
concern and will be the basis for recommending alternatives for the final cleanup. Surface
water, sediments, air, and soil sampling has been completed. Groundwater and radiological
sampling are continuing. The investigation is scheduled to be completed in 1992.
Site Facts: In 1984, the State and the potentially responsible party, under EPA supervision,
entered into an Administrative Order on Consent requiring the party to prepare a study of
the site's groundwater contamination problems and to develop systems to address the plume.
In 1986, the State directed the party to improve its groundwater decontamination system by
modifying and upgrading it immediately and expanding the groundwater monitoring program.
In 1986, the EPA filed an action against the party in Federal District Court for failure to
certify compliance with groundwater monitoring and financial assurance requirements for the
three surface impoundments used for groundwater and process water treatment. In 1988, the
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy and Shieldalloy Corp.
signed an Administrative Order on Consent to implement an upgraded pump and treatment
system and to perform a site-wide study.
Environmental Progress
The initial treatment of contaminated groundwater and the removal of underground storage
tanks have reduced the threat to public health and the environment while studies leading to
the final selection of cleanup technologies for the Shieldalloy Corp. site are taking place. The
EPA has determined that the site does not pose an immediate threat to the surrounding
communities or the environment.
March 1992 220 SHIELDALLOY CORP.
-------
Site Repository
Newfield Borough Library, Catawba Avenue and Church Street, Newfield, NJ 08344
SHIELDALLOY CORP.
221
March 1992
-------
SOUTH BRUNSWIG
LANDFILL
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980530679
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Middlesex County
1/2 mile northwest of Route 1
Other Names:
Browning-Ferris Industries
The South Brunswick Landfill covers 68 acres in Middlesex County. The site was a landfill for
over 20 years before it was closed by the State in 1978. The landfill received municipal refuse,
pesticides, chemical wastes, and hazardous wastes. In 1980, the EPA conducted an
investigation and found volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and iron in the groundwater and
surface water. The landfill is adjacent to a school, a park, and private residences, although a
substantial portion of the property is surrounded by woods. Residences are located as close as
100 to 200 feet from the site. A nearby brook feeds into a public drinking water supply 10
miles downstream.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater, sediments, soils, leachate, and surface water are contaminated
with VOCs and heavy metals including iron. People who touch or accidentally
ingest contaminated water and soil may be at risk. Systems to collect the leachate
are in place; therefore, the threat of contaminants migrating from the site is
minimal.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two long-term remedial phases focusing on controlling the
source of contamination and cleanup of the off-site contamination.
222
March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Source Control: In 1983, the EPA selected a remedy that called for the
installation of a system to collect and treat the leachate; construction of a trench,
known as a slurry wall, filled with materials that prevent seepage; covering of the
landfill with clay; and the installation of a system to vent gas buildup. The EPA completed all
the remedies to control the source of the contamination in 1985. The EPA plans to monitor
the site for 30 years to ensure the effectiveness of the cleanup
Off-Site Contamination: The EPA will be investigating the extent of
contamination that has migrated off the site. Once the investigation is completed
and the results are evaluated, cleanup measures will be recommended, if necessary,
to address contamination in the area around the landfill.
Environmental Progress
The EPA has completed all work required to control the source of contamination. The site
will be monitored for the effectiveness of these remedies for a period of 30 years. The EPA
also plans to conduct an investigation into the extent of off-site contamination and will
recommend any necessary remedies for cleanup of the area surrounding the South Brunswick
Landfill site.
Site Repository
South Brunswick Public Library, 110 Kingston Lane, Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852
SOUTH BRUNSWICK LANDFILL
223
March 1992
-------
Site Description
SOUTH JERSEY
CLOTHING C
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980766828
The South Jersey Clothing Co. (SJCC) is an active facility that once manufactured military
uniforms. As part of the manufacturing process, assembled garments were treated by a dry
cleaning unit that utilized trichloroethylene (TCE). These operations generated
TCE-contaminated wastewaters and sludges that were routinely discharged onto the ground
behind the process building and along the adjacent railroad tracks. In addition, a fire in 1979
may have released an estimated 275 gallons of TCE from a storage tank located on site. In
1981, various sampling efforts by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy (NJDEPE) and the Atlantic County Department of Health and Institutions
revealed significant contamination of groundwater and soils in the vicinity of the site. Later
the same year, a number of drums and contaminated soils were excavated and removed from
the SJCC site by the site owners. The following year, the SJCC agreed to install 12
groundwater monitoring wells in the vicinity of the site between 1981 and 1984. In addition,
the SJCC installed a groundwater pump and treatment system which still remains in
operation. Buena Borough began construction of a municipal water supply system in 1985
independent of NJDEPE efforts, and expanded it in 1988 to serve approximately 75 percent
of its population. The SJCC is located 500 feet from Garden State Cleaners (GSC), also a
site on the NPL. The SJCC and GSC sites are being addressed in a combined investigation
due to their proximity to one another and similar contamination. The surrounding area is
predominately rural and one of New Jersey's prime agricultural areas. Approximately 9,000
people obtain drinking water, and 3,800 acres of farmland are irrigated from wells within 3
miles of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 10/04/89
The groundwater and soil are contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), primarily TCE. Use of contaminated groundwater for domestic purposes
and agricultural irrigation may pose a potential health threat. There are potential
public health concerns associated with homes that have not yet been connected to
the area-wide water supply. Private residences located approximately 4,000 feet
downgradient from the two sites are not connected to the municipal water supply
system.
224 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in a single long-term remedial phase focusing on cleanup of the
entire site.
Response Action Status
Entire Site: The EPA began an intensive investigation in 1989 to determine the
nature and extent of contamination and to identify alternatives for cleanup of the
SJCC site. Based on the results of the investigation, the following remedy was
chosen: in-place treatment of contaminated soil using a vapor extraction process; extraction
of groundwater with concentrations of VOCs above Federal standards; treatment of
groundwater with an on-site air stripping column and carbon absorption units; reinjection of
the treated water into the aquifer; and long-term monitoring of groundwater. The design of
the remedy is currently underway and is expected to be completed by late 1993.
Site Facts: The EPA sent a special Notice Letter to the owners in 1988 requesting a
proposal to conduct or finance site studies. Based on information obtained from the site
owners and other sources, the EPA determined that the company is neither financially nor
technically capable of undertaking the cleanup activities. Instead, the EPA will conduct the
required work using Trust Fund monies.
Environmental Progress
The EPA performed preliminary evaluations and determined that, as a result of previous
actions taken to address contaminated groundwater and soil, the site does not present an
immediate threat to the surrounding residents or the environment while the engineering
design for the selected remedy is in progress.
Site Repository
Buena Borough Municipal Building, 616 Central Avenue, Minotola, NJ 08341
SOUTH JERSEY CLOTHING CO. 225 March 1992
-------
SPENCE FARM />>^^ EPA REGION 2
Ort-l>IWI_ rJ«iniVI ^V^^C^v^ Ocean County
NEW JERSEY &T¥~$\:— |T PlumstedTownship
EPA ID# NJD980532816 \SloV Xs/ Other Names:
Thlokol Corporation Site
Site Description
The Spence Farm site covers about 20 acres in Plumsted Township, 2 miles northeast of New
Egypt. From the 1950s to the 1970s, hazardous wastes in drums, bulk, and free-flowing liquid
form were disposed of in the wooded and low-lying areas of the site. Some of the drums were
intact, while others appeared to have been opened prior to dumping. Other drums rusted
enough to allow their contents to leak out. Laboratory wastes were scattered throughout the
disposal area. State investigations found volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in groundwater
and surface water. Spence Farm, the Friedman Property, Goose Farm, and Pijak Farm, all on
the NPL, are called the "Plumsted Sites" and are within a 2-mile radius of each other. The
site is in a rural area, and the land is used for agriculture. The Town of New Egypt has a
population of 2,100. Two municipal water wells are about 1 1/2 miles from the farm. On the
site are two tributaries to Crosswick Creek.
c-+« DM«««»-U-I-* TU- v • u • AA A^ u NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
Proposed Date: 10/23/81
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater and sediments were contaminated with the VOC acetone; phthalate,
a plastics by-product; phenol; and the heavy metals zinc, chromium, and mercury.
Soil was contaminated with VOCs including methylene chloride and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are still
contained in the soil. Crosswick Creek contains mercury, zinc, and toluene.
Because the farm is operating, there is a chance that the groundwater is used for
domestic purposes and irrigation. Coming in contact with or ingesting the water, as
well as sediments, may have posed a health threat. Individuals who come in direct
contact with PCB-contaminated soils may be at risk. Groundwater at the site flows
toward tributaries of Crosswick Creek, which allowed the contamination in the
groundwater to migrate to the surface water. Those who use the creek for
recreation may suffer adverse health effects by coming in contact with or
accidentally ingesting the water. In addition, wildlife in and around the creek may
be harmed by the pollutants.
226 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1982, the State installed 16 monitoring wells for
sampling of groundwater.
Entire Site: In 1984, the EPA selected a remedy to clean up the site which
included removing all drums and laboratory wastes and disposing of them at a
federally approved facility; excavating contaminated soil and disposing of it at a
federally approved facility; installing a system to control the sediment so contaminants do not
migrate during excavation; and monitoring the groundwater for 5 years to ensure the
effectiveness of the cleanup. Morton-Thiokol, under State supervision, completed soil and
material removal activities at the site in 1990. However, recent sampling shows that additional
site soils are contaminated with PCBs. Additional soil sampling will be conducted in 1992 to
determine the quantity of contaminated soil to be excavated. Although the groundwater has
now been determined to be clean, monitoring will continue for two more years.
Site Facts: In 1985, the State and Morton-Thiokol entered into an Administrative Order on
Consent requiring the company to clean up the site.
Environmental Progress
Removal of the sources of contamination has reduced the potential for future migration of
contaminants into surface water and groundwater. The potentially responsible party, under
State supervision, will monitor the Spence Farm site for another two years to ensure the
groundwater pollution has completely dissipated.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
SPENCE FARM
227
March 1992
-------
Site Description
SWOPEOIL&
CHEMICAL CO, Pennsauken Township
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD041743220
The Swope Oil & Chemical Co. site is located in an industrial area in the northern
Pennsauken Township. The 2-acre site is bordered by a railway and national highway. Swope
Oil & Chemical Co., a chemical reclamation facility, operated from 1965 until 1979,
processing solvents, oils, paints, and other chemical compounds. The site included one main
building, a "distillation house", a drum storage area, an unlined lagoon, a diked tank farm,
and an area containing buried sludge waste. The soil and shallow groundwater in the area are
contaminated, as well as the deeper aquifer beneath the site. Waste liquids and sludges were
discharged to an excavated, unlined lagoon. Contaminated materials also were placed within a
diked tank farm and in an exposed drum storage area. In 1975, after several inspections,
Swope was cited for operating without proper permits. Four years later, it was cited again,
this time for failure to prepare, maintain, and implement a Spill Prevention, Containment,
and Countermeasure Plan. The company ceased operations in late 1979. The site is in a
predominantly industrial area. Approximately 17,000 people reside in the area and depend on
groundwater from municipal wells located 175 feet south of the site.
-.. -, ...... T, ...... .. . iU , NPL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date: 07/23/82
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
The soil is contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), phthalates, and metals. The groundwater is primarily
contaminated with VOCs. Railroad employees and trespassers may be exposed to
contaminants through direct contact with and accidental ingestion of contaminated
soil. The contamination in the aquifer beneath the site could lead to drinking
water contamination.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on removal of contaminants and cleanup of the groundwater and soil.
228 March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1982, the EPA removed two fuel storage tanks and
approximately 180,000 gallons of liquid sludge containing hazardous material. In
addition, a temporary cap was placed over contaminated sludge lagoons to
prevent the further migration of contaminants. A security fence was built around the site.
Removal of Contaminants: In 1985, the EPA selected the following cleanup
methods: removal of tanks and buildings with off-site incineration, treatment, or
disposal of tank contents, and off-site disposal of tanks and building debris;
construction of a cap at the site; preparation of a supplemental investigation to determine the
nature and extent of groundwater contamination and to identify alternatives for cleanup;
excavation of up to 1 1/2 feet of contaminated soil containing PCBs and off-site disposal;
excavation of up to 1 1/2 feet of PCB-contaminated soils below the lagoon and off-site
disposal; and sampling, excavation, and off-site disposal of contaminated soils containing
PCBs from the parking lot area and along the railroad right-of-way adjacent to the lagoon.
Should additional sampling determine that cleanup of soil to these depths will not achieve the
cleanup goals, the cleanup action for this area will be re-evaluated. As part of the surface
cleanup effort, the following actions have been completed: excavation and off-site disposal of
more than 24,000 tons of PCB-contaminated soils and backfilled excavations; removal and
disposal of 70 tanks and their contents; removal of asbestos-containing insulation; and
removal of cesspool and septic structures with associated hazardous liquids. A cap will be
installed over the site after cleanup of the contaminated subsurface soils is completed.
Groundwater and Soil: In late 1991, the EPA selected a remedy for the
treatment of contaminated subsurface soils which are contributing contamination
to groundwater. The selected remedy calls for the in-place treatment of volatile
and semi-volatile organic subsurface soil contaminants through vapor extraction with
biodegradation. In addition, the groundwater will be monitored for a period of five years to
assess the impact of surface contamination on the groundwater. The engineering design of
the selected remedy is scheduled to begin in late 1992. The EPA has postponed installation of
a cap over the site, since the in-place treatment of subsurface soils may make installation of
the cap unnecessary.
Site Facts: Cleanup activities at the Swope Oil & Chemical Co. site are being conducted by
a group of potentially responsible parties, collectively known as the Swope Oil Cleanup
Committee, under monitoring by the EPA.
Environmental Progress
The EPA and potentially responsible parties have removed large quantities of the
contaminated surficial materials and soils from the Swope Oil & Chemical Co. site and
temporarily capped the contaminated sludge lagoons to prevent the further migration of
contaminants from the site. These measures, as well as building a security fence around the
site, have reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials at the site while cleanup
proceeds.
SWOPE OIL & CHEMICAL CO. 229 March 1992
-------
Site Repository
Clerk's Office, Township of Pennsauken, 5605 North Crescent Boulevard,
Pennsauken, NJ 08110
March 1992
230
SWOPE OIL & CHEMICAL CO.
-------
SYNCON RESINS
NEW JERSEY ^— & Kearny
EPAID# NJD064263817
Site Description
The Syncon Resins site encompasses approximately 15 acres and is located on a heavily
industrialized area of northern New Jersey. The site is situated on the peninsula formed by
the Passaic and Hackensack Rivers. In addition to the buildings on site, there are two unlined
lagoons, numerous large bulk storage tanks, underground storage tanks, and at least two
chemical reactor buildings housing stainless steel vessels. Prior to removal, the site also
contained approximately 12,800 55-gallon drums. Some of the 55-gallon drums had rusted,
spilling their contents onto the soil. The Syncon Resins facility produced alkyd resin carriers
for pigments, paints, and varnish products. In the production process, excess xylene or toluene
was separated from the wastewater and was reused in subsequent reactions. The remaining
wastewater was pumped to an unlined lagoon to evaporate or percolate into the soil.
Investigations of the site have found that there is extensive contamination of the
groundwater, soil, building dirt and dust, and stainless vessels and tanks. The site is in an
industrial area, with 10,000 people residing within 3 miles of the site. The closest residential
area is a mile to the west in Newark. There are no municipal water supply wells in the
immediate area.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal and State actions.
Proposed Date: 07/23/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
toluene, xylenes, and trichloroethylene (TCE) and heavy metals such as lead and
nickel. Contaminants in the sediments include heavy metals, VOCs, and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Soil is contaminated with the pesticides DDT
and aldrin, as well as heavy metals, VOCs, and PCBs. Potential health threats exist
through direct contact, inhalation of contaminated dust, and accidental ingestion of
soils. The site is situated within a coastal wetland area, which could be at risk from
contaminant runoff.
231 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Starting in late 1982, the State removed all of the exposed
55-gallon drums from the site, cleaned up the lab area, and stored the materials
found on site. These actions were completed in early 1984. In early 1990, the site
was fenced to provide additional security during cleanup.
Entire Site: Based on the results of the site investigation, in 1986 the EPA
selected the following methods for site cleanup: remove the contents of the
storage tanks and vessels for off-site disposal; decontaminate buildings and tank
structures as necessary; excavate lagoon liquids, sediments, and contaminated surface soil and
dispose of off site; install a cover over the site that allows natural flushing of underlying soil
and groundwater contaminants; collect and treat contaminated water from the shallow
aquifer, with discharge to the Passaic River; and conduct supplemental studies to evaluate
methods to enhance the effectiveness of flushing and/or treatment and destruction of the
contaminated soils. Cleanup activities have begun at the site and are slated for completion in
1992. To date, the building has been decontaminated, asbestos has been removed, and the
groundwater collection system has been installed.
Site Facts: In December 1982, the EPA and the State of New Jersey entered into a
Cooperative Agreement for the State to perform site investigations and cleanup activities.
Environmental Progress
By removing all the visible contaminated 55-gallon drums, cleaning up the lab area, storing
the contaminated materials found on the Syncon Resins site, and securing the site, the threat
of exposure to hazardous materials has been reduced. The EPA has determined that the site
is safe to the surrounding community and the environment while final cleanup actions are
being taken.
Site Repository
Kearny Public Library, 318 Kearny Avenue, Kearny, NJ 07302
March 1992 232 SYNCON RESINS
-------
TABERNACLE
DUMP
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980761357
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Burlington County
1/2 mile from Bozarthtown
The Tabernacle Drum Dump site is a wooded, 1-acre parcel of undeveloped land located on
Carranza Road in Tabernacle Township in the northern region of the New Jersey Pine
Barrens. In a one-time dumping incident in the summer of 1976 or 1977, approximately 200
containers (55-gallon drums, 20-gallon containers, and several 5-gallon pails) of solvents,
paint, and paint sludges were deposited on a 2,000-square-foot portion of the property. These
containers were stored at the site until 1984. Deterioration and leakage of some containers
resulted in visible soil and groundwater contamination. Based on a referral from Tabernacle
Township officials, the Burlington County Health Department conducted a site inspection in
1982 and discovered over 100 abandoned drums. The New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) followed-up with a more detailed site
inspection, collecting drum and soil samples. Sampling revealed the presence of carbon
tetrachloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, chromium and lead. Land in the area
is used primarily for agriculture and recreation. Approximately 75 to 100 residences living
within a 1-mile radius of the site are dependent on groundwater wells for potable and
agricultural purposes.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal and potentially responsible
parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
The heavy metals lead, chromium, and cadmium and the volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) tetrachloroethylene and dichloroethylene are the major
groundwater contaminants. On-site soils are mainly contaminated with chromium,
cyanide, and lead. A Public Health Evaluation (PHE) was conducted which showed
that ingestion of contaminated groundwater, especially by residents downgradient
of the site, poses the greatest threat to the community. The PHE also showed that
since the site is unfenced, individuals entering the site are at risk when
contaminated soil is touched or accidentally swallowed. However, this risk has been
reduced by the excavation of the contaminated soil and the removal of all the
drums and containers. In addition, the EPA has implemented a residential well
sampling program which, thus far, indicates that the sampled residential water
meets federal health-based standards.
233
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the groundwater and any residual soil contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1984, under EPA supervision, Atlantic Disposal Services
(ADS), a potentially responsible party, numbered, logged, and sampled on-site
containers. ADS completed surface cleanup in 1984 that consisted of removing
containers, 40 yards of drummed materials, 8 truckloads of excavated soil, and approximately
3,000 gallons of liquid material.
Groundwater and Residual Soil: The plan selected by the EPA to clean up
the site includes: installation of groundwater monitoring wells and a monitoring
program to trace the groundwater plume; groundwater pump and treatment using
air stripping and possibly carbon adsorption followed by reinjection of treated water,
groundwater monitoring, and exhaust gas analysis; and soil sampling of the former drum
dumping and storage area to determine if residual contamination is present. The EPA has
performed, and continues to perform, residential well sampling and analysis in the area of the
site. USX Corporation, one of the potentially responsible parties, began designing the
site-specific technologies to be used in the cleanup in 1988. In early 1991, the EPA approved
the design of the final cleanup remedy prepared by USX Corporation. The company
completed the soil sampling in the former drum dumping storage in March 1991 and began a
groundwater plume investigation at that time. The investigation included a quick plume
tracking methodology, known as drive point sampling, to delineate the general location of the
plume. Drive point sampling occurred in two phases and was completed in mid-1991. As
follow-up to the drive point sampling, twenty-two monitoring wells were installed in 1991. Six
additional wells were installed in early 1992. The well network was sampled from late 1991
through early 1992. The design of the groundwater extraction, treatment, and injection
system has been on-going and is expected to be completed in 1992. The design includes an
additional investigation to determine the horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant
plume, continuation of the residential sampling program, and soil sampling in the former
drum disposal area. Final cleanup activities are expected to begin in 1992.
Site Facts: A Unilateral Order was issued in 1984 to ADS, requiring the company to
remove the containers and to excavate contaminated soil. The EPA sent Notice Letters to
the potentially responsible parties in 1985. In 1989, the EPA and USX Corporation signed a
Consent Decree, requiring the company to perform the cleanup at the site.
March 1992 234 TABERNACLE DRUM DUMP
-------
Environmental Progress
By removing the contaminated containers, soil, and liquids from the Tabernacle Drum Dump
site, the EPA and the potentially responsible parties have reduced the potential for exposure
to hazardous materials at the site while further cleanup activities are taking place.
Site Repository
Tabernacle Township Building, 163 Carranza Road, Tabernacle Township, NJ 08088
TABERNACLE DRUM DUMP
235
March 1992
-------
Site Description
U.S. RADIUM CdRPXi/ EPAJ2S!2N 2
NEW JERSEY S jC City of Orange
EPA ID# NJD980654172 | r^J other Names:
U.S. Radium-West Orange
The U.S. Radium Corp. site covers 2 acres in the City of Orange. The site is a former
processing facility where radium extraction, production, application, and distribution took
place from about 1917 through 1926. Approximately 1/2 ton of ore per day was processed and
disposed of on and off the site. The original buildings on the site have been removed or
incorporated into the seven buildings that still exist. Other areas identified as being
potentially contaminated include properties covering about 21 acres in the vicinity of the site,
and 22 satellite properties located throughout the Cities of Orange, East Orange, and South
Orange. Approximately 50,000 people live within a mile of the site. The vicinity and satellite
properties are occupied by light industries, offices, houses, grocery stores, and apartments.
The main site is located in a urban residential neighborhood.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions. Final Date. 09/08/83
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Threats and Contaminants
Soil contains radium-226 and other radioactive materials. The radium-226 decays
to radon gas and radon decay products which can concentrate in basements and
other ground-level enclosed spaces. People who are directly exposed to radiation,
inhale radioactive dust particles, or inadvertently ingest radioactive particles from
the site may suffer adverse health effects.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
236 March 1992
-------
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The EPA will be installing radon control systems and
gamma radiation shielding at certain properties where elevated contaminant levels
have been detected. In 1989, a fence was installed around the perimeter of the
site to prevent trespassers from coming into contact with contaminated material.
Entire Site: The EPA is conducting an investigation to determine the nature and
extent of contamination on the site. In addition, the EPA is investigating both
vicinity and satellite properties for radium-contaminated soil. Once the study is
completed, scheduled for 1993, measures will be recommended to clean up the affected areas.
Environmental Progress
By constructing a fence around the site, access has been restricted, thereby making the site
safer while the investigations leading to the final selection of cleanup technologies for the
U.S. Radium Corp. site are taking place. In addition, the installation of radon control systems
at certain properties will minimize potential radiation exposures.
Site Repository
Orange City Public Library, 348 Main Street, Orange, NJ 07050
U.S. RADIUM CORP.
237
March 1992
-------
UNIVERSAL O
PRODUCTS
(CHEMICAL Dl
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD002005106
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
East Rutherford
Other Names:
UOP Chemical Division
Universal Oil Products (Chemical Division) is located on a 75-acre site along Route 17.
Various chemicals were manufactured from 1932 until 1979, when the company ceased
operations and dismantled the plant. The company also recovered solvents and waste
chemicals at the site from 1960 through 1979. Approximately 4 1/2 million gallons of waste
solvents and solid chemical wastes were dumped into two unlined lagoons during this time,
which resulted in contamination of the soil, surface water, and groundwater. The wells for
Wellington Township are located approximately 2 1/2 miles from the site. Approximately
36,500 people within 3 miles of the site depend on groundwater for their source of drinking
water. Groundwater also provides process cooling water to local industry and drinking water
to the residents of the Township. The site is in the coastal wetland management area of the
Hackensack River Basin. Berry's Creek borders the southeastern part of the site, and
Ackerman's Creek, which is a tributary to Berry's Creek, passes through the site. Berry's
Creek joins the Hackensack River about 3 1/2 miles downstream from the site. Local
residents use the area's surface water for recreation.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 12/30/82
Final Date: 09/08/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including
benzenes, trichloroethylene (TCE), vinyl chloride, and toluene; polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs); and the heavy metals lead and arsenic. Sediments contain PCBs.
Soil contains VOCs, PCBs, and the heavy metal manganese. Surface water is
contaminated with VOCs and lead. People who come into direct contact with or
accidentally ingest contaminated soil, sediments, groundwater, or surface water
may suffer adverse health effects. The wetland management area also may be at
risk from site runoff.
238
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
directed at cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: Allied Signal, the parent company of Universal Oil
Products, removed 950,000 gallons of contaminated water from the lagoon areas
of the site in 1990. Of the 950,000 gallons of water removed, 350,000 gallons
were treated and discharged on-site and 600,000 gallons were transported to and treated at a
treatment facility in Newark. Over 1,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils were removed
from the lagoon area and were transported to a hazardous waste landfill.
Entire Site: The potentially responsible party, under New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDPE) and EPA monitoring, is
conducting a study of the nature and extent of contamination at the site. Based on
the results of the study, site cleanup may be divided into multiple long-term response actions.
The study is scheduled for completion in 1993.
Site Facts: Under an Administrative Order on Consent from the NJDPE, Allied Signal has
taken the lead in studying the nature and extent of contamination at the site.
Environmental Progress
By removing waste materials from two lagoon areas responsible for site contamination, the
threat of exposure to hazardous materials has been reduced and further environmental
degradation has been prevented at the Universal Oil Products site. The investigations leading
to the selection of final remedies for the site currently are taking place.
Site Repository
East Rutherford Memorial Library, 143 Boiling Spring Avenue, East Rutherford, NJ 07073
UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS (CHEMICAL DIVISION) 239 March 1992
-------
IIPPPP nFFRFIFWi EPA REGION 2
UKKtK Utthtritl-U Cumberland County
TOWNSHIP SA
LANDFILL
NEW JERSEY
EPAID# NJD980761399
Site Description
The Upper Deerfield Township Sanitary Landfill site is an inactive landfill covering 14 acres
on a 23-acre tract of land. The site originally was used as a gravel pit from 1938 to 1960,
when the Township purchased 12 acres; the remaining acreage was purchased by the
Township in 1977. The property was operated as a municipal landfill licensed to accept
normal household waste until it closed in 1983. Residents became concerned over the quality
of their water, and in response to requirements by the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy, the Township installed three monitoring wells. The
County sampled residential wells and the monitoring wells and found them to be
contaminated with mercury and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In 1983, the State and
the County advised residents to discontinue using their wells, and the Township began
supplying the affected residents with bottled water. In 1986, utilizing funds provided by the
State of New Jersey, the Township installed a public water supply well and distribution system
to provide potable water to residents in the area. Approximately 100 people live within a mile
of the site, and the nearest residence is about 100 feet away. Upper Deerfield Township has
a population of approximately 6,800 people.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and Municipal actions.
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater is contaminated with low levels of VOCs such as benzene,
trichloroethylene (TCE), and vinyl chloride and heavy metals including mercury.
Initial sampling data indicated low-level soil contamination in the fill area. People
who drink or touch the contaminated groundwater may suffer adverse health
affects. In addition, people who touch or accidentally ingest the contaminated soils
may be at risk. The immediate threat to the residents in the vicinity of the landfill
was eliminated by the installation of the alternate water supply in 1986.
240 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
addressing the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: After detection of residential well contamination in 1983
and before the completion of the public water supply and distribution system in
1986, the Township supplied affected residents with bottled water and
subsequently installed permanent water lines. All hookups to the new water system were
completed in 1986, and the supply of bottled water was discontinued.
Entire Site: In 1987, the EPA began a study to determine the type and extent of
the contamination by sampling the groundwater, soil, sediments, and air. The
results of the investigation showed that the groundwater and soil contamination
associated with the site no longer pose a health threat under current or likely future land use.
In 1991, it was determined that no further actions were necessary to address the
contamination at the site. However, since groundwater contamination did exist in the vicinity
of the landfill and because low levels of hazardous substances will remain on site, continued
air and groundwater monitoring is necessary. A comprehensive monitoring program of the air
and groundwater is currently being implemented and monitoring is expected to begin in late
1992.
Site Facts: Notice letters have been sent to potentially responsible parties known to have
utilized the site. To date, no viable potentially responsible parties have been located, with the
exception of the Township, which operated the landfill.
Environmental Progress
Provision of an alternate water supply has reduced the threat of exposure to contaminants in
drinking water. After the EPA performed a detailed investigation, it was determined that the
Upper Deerfield Township Sanitary Landfill site no longer posed a health threat. No cleanup
actions are required except groundwater and air monitoring to ensure the safety of the site.
Site Repository
Cumberland County Library, 800 East Commerce Street, Bridgeton, NJ 08302
UPPER DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP SANITARY LANDFILL 241 March 1992
-------
VENTRON/VE
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980529879
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
Wood-Ridge Borough
Other Names:
Berry's Creek
Thiokol Chemical
Wood-Ridge Chemical
The 40-acre Ventron/Velsicol site operated as a chemical processing plant from 1929 until
1974. During that time, approximately 160 tons of process waste were buried on site. The
Ventron facilities were abandoned and demolished in 1974. Two buildings have been erected
on site where the old Mercury processing plant stood. Presently, one of these buildings is
used as a food distribution center. Contaminants still remain on site and are suspected of
migrating off site in groundwater and air. The Ventron/Velsicol Site is located in a densely
populated and industrialized area; however, access to the site is restricted. There are
approximately 11,600 people living within a 1-mile radius of the site.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
zni
Groundwater and sediments on site are contaminated with mercury. Off-site
sediments are contaminated with mercury and zinc. Soils and surface water contain
various heavy metals. Private wells located in the vicinity of the site are believed to
be contaminated. Nearby residents could be exposed to site-related contaminants
when drinking or touching the water or sediments in the creek. Because wastes
were dumped directly onto the ground, on-site workers also may be exposed to
contaminated soils and sediments. The migration of site-related contaminants is
threatening nearby wetlands.
242
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two phases: immediate actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In late 1990, soils contaminated with elevated levels of
mercury were removed from nine surrounding residential properties and one
publicly-owned tract. The contaminated soils were replaced with clean fill.
Entire Site: The EPA and the State of New Jersey have began investigating the
site contamination and the most effective methods to clean up the site. An outline
of the investigations and work that will be performed to determine the nature and
extent of site contamination has been completed. An initial study concerning the amount and
the effects of mercury accumulation in fish, as well as other organisms in the food chain of
the affected area, was completed in 1988. Aquatic organisms were found to have
bioaccumulated mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from the food chain. All
investigations are planned to be completed in 1994. The EPA will review these study findings
as well as other site investigation results to select final technologies and cleanup strategies to
address site contamination and potential health threats.
Environmental Progress
The removal of contaminated soils from nine residential properties and one publicly owned
tract has reduced the threat of exposure to hazardous materials from the Ventron/Velsicol
site while investigations leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies taking place.
Site Repository
Carlstadt Public Library, 420 Hackensack Street, Carlstadt, NJ 07062
VENTRON/VELSICOL 243 March 1992
-------
Site Description
VINELAND CH
CO., INC. Vineland
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD002385664
The Vineland Chemical Co., Inc. (ViChem) has manufactured arsenic-based herbicides since
1950 on this 54-acre site in a residential and industrial area of Vineland City. The plant site
includes several manufacturing and storage buildings, a laboratory, several lagoons, and
former chicken coops. The majority of the site is covered with vegetation, with the exception
of the parking lots and a paved manufacturing area. A security fence surrounds the main part
of the plant, including the manufacturing buildings and lagoon area. Prior to 1977, the
company stored by-product arsenic salts in open piles and in the chicken coops. As a result of
water contacting the exposed piles, arsenic has contaminated the subsurface soils,
groundwater, and the nearby Maurice River system downstream of the site. Also downstream
from the site is Union Lake, which covers approximately 800 acres. The Maurice River
system extends 26 miles from the lake to the Delaware Bay. By 1982, ViChem, in response to
State actions, instituted some cleanup actions and modified the production process. These
modifications included: installing a non-contact cooling water system, lining two of the
lagoons, installing a storm water runoff collection system, and disposing of piles of waste salts.
Also in 1982, ViChem, under a State Administrative Order, began operating a wastewater
decontamination system to remove arsenic. The decontamination system receives
contaminated process water and groundwater from two lined surface impoundments and
discharges treated water to percolation lagoons under a State permit. However, the
decontamination system can treat only 35,000 gallons of contaminated water per day, while
an estimated 150,000 gallons leave the site daily, and the system has been unable to reduce
arsenic concentrations to acceptable levels. Approximately 57,000 people depend on the
groundwater system in the area, either through private or municipal wells, for drinking water.
Residential areas are located on all sides of the site. Numerous towns and villages are close
to the Maurice River.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions. Final Date: 09/21/84
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
244 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The groundwater is contaminated with heavy metals including arsenic, antimony,
cadmium, and lead and the volatile organic compound (VOC) trichloroethylene
(TCE). The surface soil on the site is contaminated with arsenic and small amounts
of other heavy metals. The subsurface soil is contaminated only with arsenic.
Arsenic also has contaminated Union Lake and the Maurice River. Results of a
health screening study showed that ViChem employees had elevated
concentrations of arsenic in their blood and urine. Accidental ingestion, direct
contact, or inhalation of the contaminants may subject workers or trespassers to an
increased exposure to carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks. Nearby residents
downstream of the plant site using well water also may be subject to health risks.
Because of the contamination migrating from the site to the Maurice River and
Union Lake, recreational activities have been restricted at Union Lake.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in five phases: initial actions and four long-term remedial phases
focusing on plant site source control and migration management, and cleanup of the river and
Union Lake sediments.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: The EPA currently is boarding up the chicken coops and
abandoned buildings, removing hazardous chemicals stored on site and fencing off
the contaminated areas because the owners are planning to abandon the site.
Plant Site Source Control: The EPA plans to clean up the
arsenic-contaminated soil, which is a continuing source of groundwater
contamination, by using in-place soil flushing. This process will accelerate natural
soil flushing in four active zones that will be bermed and flooded. The engineering design of
the remedy is currently being prepared and is expected to be completed by 1993.
Plant Site Management of Migration: The EPA plans to clean up the
arsenic-contaminated underlying shallow groundwater and stop its migration to
the Blackwater Branch, a tributary to the Maurice River by pumping groundwater
at a high flow rate, which will then be treated and recharged to the aquifer and, if required,
to the river. The engineering design of the treatment process is underway and is expected to
be completed in 1993. Construction is expected to be completed by late 1994. After
construction, treatment of the contaminated groundwater is expected to take 13 years to
complete.
VINELAND CHEMICAL CO., INC. 245 March 1992
-------
River Areas Sediments: In the Blackwater Branch tributary, the EPA plans to
clean up those areas with unacceptably high arsenic concentrations by excavating
contaminated flood plain sediments and removing the arsenic. The sediment then
will be redeposited in the flood plain. At the same time, the submerged contaminated
sediments will be dredged, cleaned, and deposited in undeveloped areas of the site. The water
used to treat the sediment will be treated to remove arsenic, which would then be
transported, in the form of sludge, to an off-site hazardous waste facility. After the cleanup
action is completed, a 3-year period of natural river flushing will then be used to complete
cleanup of the rest of the river areas.
Union Lake Sediments: After the river areas are cleaned, the EPA plans to
clean up those areas of the lake with unacceptably high arsenic concentrations by
lowering the water level and then dredging. High public access areas, including the
public beach and the sailing club, will be cleaned up by treating the contaminated materials
with clean water, and then returning the cleaned material to the lake. The extraction water
used for treatment will be treated to remove and convert arsenic to a sludge form for off-site
treatment and disposal. The treated water will be returned to the lake.
Site Facts: The EPA is performing environmental studies to determine the need to cleanup
the river and lake sediments. These long-term studies will use data collected before and
during the cleanup activities for the soil and groundwater.
Environmental Progress
After placing the Vineland Chemical site on the NPL, the EPA performed an evaluation and
determined that the site does not pose an imminent threat to the surrounding community or
the environment while investigations leading to the selection of final cleanup remedies are
taking place.
Site Repository
Vineland Public Library, 1058 East Landis Avenue, Vineland, NJ 08360
March 1992
246
VINELAND CHEMICAL CO., INC.
-------
VINELAND
SCHOOL Vinaiand
IFDQFV /s>, | y Other Names:
UtnOtI 1 ^w^My Vineland Development Center (VDC)
EPA ID# NJD980529887
Site Description
The Vineland State School site is a residential and treatment facility for mentally
handicapped women. The State's Department of Human Services runs the facility, which sits
on a 195-acre campus located in a primarily suburban and residential setting on East Landis
Avenue in Vineland. The school operated an unregulated incinerator and landfill on the
property to dispose of its waste. The incinerator has been dismantled, and the pit was filled in
and graded. In the early 1980s, hazardous chemicals including polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) may have been dumped at the site. The school property consists of five distinct
subsites, where the following activities took place: (1) the school dumped between 6,000 and
8,000 one-quart containers of mercury-based pesticides into ponded water, about 20 feet
below the ground; (2) an on-site contractor spilled approximately 150 gallons of PCB-laced
transformer oil onto the ground when four large transformers were removed in the
mid-1970s; (3) starting in the 1950s, the school used a part of the site as a general dump for
any type of wastes, including chemicals produced and used at the school; (4) during the early
to mid-1950s, the school dumped an unknown amount of transformer oil laced with PCBs
from out-of-service electrical transformers into a 10- to 15-foot-deep pit; and (5)
approximately 10 cubic yards of pesticides and possibly other chemicals the school used for
farming may have been dumped into a 10-foot-deep pit some time during the 1950s. The
State of New Jersey investigated a PCB spill that occurred in subsite 2, which led to an
extensive cleanup of PCB-contaminated soil, building rubble, concrete and construction
material, soil contaminated with gasoline, and asbestos roofing. Approximately 13,620 people
within 3 miles of the site depend on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water.
The school itself houses approximately 1,050 residents.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal and State actions.
Threats and Contaminants
Final Date: 09/08/83
Groundwater contains low levels of the pesticides DDT and dieldrin; volatile
organic compounds (VOCs); phthalate, which is a plastics by-product; and heavy
metals including lead and mercury. Soils in the subsite 2 area contained oil
contaminated with PCBs and fluid from electrical transformers. Soils also
contained heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and pesticides.
As a result of the State investigation, it was determined that the very low levels of
contaminants in the soil and groundwater do not pose a threat to human health or
the environment.
247 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed through immediate actions; further investigations showed that no
other cleanup actions are required.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy (NJDEPE) installed three monitoring wells and sampled soils at the
site. The City of Vineland extended its water main to the school and several
homes near the site that previously used water from private wells. In 1988, the NJDEPE
removed PCB-contaminated soil at subsite 2 and installed a permanent cap over the area. A
fence was installed around subsite 2.
Entire Site: The State completed a study of contaminants at the site in 1989. The
EPA determined that no further cleanup actions were needed at the site because
of the following conditions: subsite 2 was cleaned up by the immediate actions
described above; the State's study of the four remaining areas shows that low contamination
levels do not pose a threat to human health; and the City extended its public water supply
system to the affected residences near the site. The State will monitor groundwater and the
disposal areas on site to ensure that the cleanup of soil remains protective and that the
groundwater under the site remains free of contaminants.
Environmental Progress
After studying conditions at the Vineland State School site, the EPA and the State
determined that the actions already taken to provide the affected area residences with a safe
alternate drinking water supply and the low contaminant levels in the remaining areas of
contamination did not warrant any further cleanup actions at the site. The Vineland State
School site is being closely monitored, however, to ensure that the steps taken to clean up
subsite 2 remain effective.
Site Repository
Vineland Public Library, 1058 East Landis Avenue, Vineland, NJ 08360
March 1992 248 VINELAND STATE SCHOOL
-------
W.R. GRACE
& CO. INC./ --r Wayne Township
WAYNE INTERIM
STORAGE SITE
(USDOE)
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID#NJ1891837980
Site Description
From 1948 until 1971, site operators extracted thorium and rare earths from monazite ore on
the 6 1/2-acre W.R. Grace & Co., Inc./Wayne Interim Storage site in Wayne Township. In
1971, W.R. Grace ceased processing monazite ore and amended its Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) license to cover only the storage of radioactive materials. In 1974, the
company decontaminated the property, burying much of the materials to the then-established
criteria. In 1975, the NRC released the land for unrestricted use, provided that the deed
indicated the presence of radioactive material under the site's surface. In 1980, the EPA
conducted an aerial survey that showed elevated radiation levels at the plant site, an adjacent
school bus maintenance facility, a township park, the banks of Sheffield Brook, and the
Pompton Plains railroad spur. Much of the off-site contamination was spread by runoff and
water discharges from the site. From 1985 through 1987, the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), acting under its authority through the 1984 Energy and Water Appropriations Act,
which specifically addressed the W.R. Grace site, investigated and removed radioactively
contaminated soils from the school bus maintenance facility, township park, and the banks of
the Sheffield Brook, and stockpiled them at the W.R. Grace & Co., Inc. facility. This facility
was acquired by DOE for this purpose. Radioactive process wastes, process equipment, and
building rubble still are buried beneath the site. An active agricultural area is located within
200 feet of the site, and there are homes located to the east and along Sheffield Brook.
Many commercial businesses lie within 3 miles of the site. Residents within 3 miles of the site
rely on groundwater for drinking, household, and irrigation purposes. The municipal well
system serves 51,000 people, and the nearest well is 3,200 feet from the site. Local surface
water is used for recreation.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal actions.
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
249 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
The contaminants identified in the groundwater and surface water are radioactive
particles in the thorium and uranium decay series. The cleanup and stockpiling of
waste has decreased the health risk to the surrounding community. Radionuclide
contamination in soil and sediment is still a potential concern at the Pompton
Plains railroad spur.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Cleanup activities began in 1985 under DOE's "Formerly
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program" (FUSRAP). The DOE excavated and
contained about 39,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil from all areas except the
railroad spur area. A stockpile was constructed at the interim storage site to contain the
contaminated soil. Another 70,000 cubic yards of contaminated wastes exist below-grade at
the site. The DOE is continuing to maintain and monitor the site and is complying with State
permit requirements.
Entire Site: In late 1989, the DOE began an intensive study of remaining
contamination at and around the W.R. Grace site. This investigation is exploring
the nature and extent of remaining contamination, which will result in
recommendations for cleanup of any residual contamination. The DOE has sampled the
storage pile, the railroad spur area, and the material buried on site below the storage pile.
Field work was completed in late 1991. The entire investigation is expected to be completed
in 1994, at which time final cleanup remedies will be selected.
Site Facts: The DOE was given responsibility for cleanup by Congressional action in 1984.
The DOE bought the site from W.R. Grace that year and renamed it the Wayne Interim
Storage Site. The Department used the site as a temporary storage facility for low-level
radioactive soils removed during cleanup of nearby properties. In accordance with an
Interagency Agreement, a draft investigation report will be submitted to the EPA by mid-
1993.
March 1992 250 W.R. GRACE & CO./ WAYNE INTERIM
STORAGE SITE (USDOE)
-------
Environmental Progress
Initial cleanup activities were completed by the DOE in 1987, and close monitoring by the by
the DOE and the EPA to ensure that radiation levels do not become elevated is keeping the
site safe while further investigations leading to a selection of final cleanup technologies are
underway.
Site Repository
Wayne Municipal Library, 474 Valley Road, Wayne, NJ 07470
W.R. GRACE & CO., INC./ WAYNE
INTERIM STORAGE SITE (USDOE)
251
March 1992
-------
Site Description
WALDICK AEROSPACES EPUA m™°" 2
Monmouth County
__ ____ Sea Girt section of Wall Township
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD054981337
The Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc. site, approximately 1 1/2 acres in size, is an inactive
industrial facility located at 2121 Highway 35 in the Sea Girt section of Wall Township. From
1979 until about 1984, Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc. leased this property for the
manufacture and plating of metal components for the aerospace industry. In 1982, State and
County inspectors found that during the years of operation a series of degreasing, dip, rinse,
and plating tanks, as well as a polishing machine, were discharging wastewater directly onto
the ground toward the front of the main building. Runoff flowed across the front lawn. In
addition, used machine oil drained out of perforated drums onto the ground at the rear of
the building. Sampling revealed that the wastes contained heavy metals, acids, and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). Soil and groundwater, as well as two of the leased buildings, are
contaminated. A third building never used by the Waldick firm has been used in recent years
for several retail operations. It is isolated from the main building by a stockade fence.
Highway 35 is an industrial/commercial corridor that separates largely undeveloped land to
the west from developed land to the east. Western land use consists mainly of woodland,
agriculture, and scattered residential areas, although a housing development is being built just
north of the site. Public and private wells within a 3-mile radius of the site serve about 41,500
people. The nearest residence is approximately 1/4 mile from the site. The few private wells in
this area are used for irrigation only. The closest drinking water well is on a residential
property about 3/8 mile upgradient from the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through NPL LISTING HISTORY
Federal, State, and County actions.
Proposed Date: 10/15/84
Final Date: 06/10/86
Threats and Contaminants
The main and auxiliary buildings are contaminated with low levels of petroleum
hydrocarbons, pesticides, dyestuffs, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
Contaminated soil and groundwater contain VOCs and heavy metals, primarily
cadmium and chromium. Surface water and sediments are contaminated with
VOCs and chromium. Accidental ingestion of or direct contact with contaminated
soils may pose a health risk.
252 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases directed at source control and cleanup of the off-site contamination.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In June 1983, the State and the County authorities
excavated about 40 cubic feet of contaminated soil from the southeastern corner
of the main building and about 40 cubic feet more from an area behind the
building. In January 1985, after the facility was abandoned, the EPA discovered about 30
drums and other containers of varying sizes containing hazardous materials, as well as a
storage cabinet of laboratory chemicals. The material was securely repackaged and shipped to
a hazardous waste disposal facility.
Source Control: The EPA selected a remedy for controlling the source of
contamination on the site in 1987 that featured: in-situ air stripping to treat
contaminated soils; excavating all treated soils showing elevated levels of metal
contamination and disposing of them off site; decontaminating or demolishing the buildings,
depending on how severely they are undermined by excavation; installing additional
groundwater monitoring wells; establishing an environmental monitoring program; and
completely fencing the site to restrict access. The EPA began the engineering design for this
remedy in 1988. Sampling conducted during the design phase determined that the originally
selected air stripping technology for soils is not appropriate. Therefore, the remedy has been
modified to include the on-site low temperature thermal treatment of contaminated soil prior
to its disposal. The design was completed in late 1991 and final cleanup actions are expected
to begin in 1992.
Off-Site Contamination: The EPA completed an investigation of the extent of
groundwater, surface water, and stream sediment contamination and selected an
interim cleanup remedy in March 1991. The interim remedy involves extracting
contaminated groundwater and treating it by chemical precipitation to remove metals,
followed by air stripping to remove VOCs. Once the groundwater is treated, it will be
reinjected into the aquifer. Additional investigations will be conducted to determine a final
cleanup remedy for the groundwater. Interim cleanup actions will begin once the engineering
design of the selected remedy is completed. The design phase began in late 1991.
Site Facts: In March 1984, Waldick was tried in Superior Court for criminal violation of
Federal and State environmental laws. Waldick and two of the three company officers have
filed for bankruptcy.
WALDICK AEROSPACE DEVICES, INC.
253
March 1992
-------
Environmental Progress
By removing the containers of hazardous materials and the laboratory chemicals, and securing
the building, the EPA has reduced the potential for exposure to contamination at the
Waldick Aerospace Devices site. Source control cleanup activities are scheduled to begin in
1992, while the design for the off-site contamination remedy in ongoing.
Site Repository
Wall Township Library, 2700 Allaire Road, Wall, NJ 07719
March 1992
254
WALDICK AEROSPACE DEVICES, INC.
-------
WHITE CHEMICAL ^pfc, Epi2!S!2N2
CORPORATION <^t^W
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980755623
Site Description
The White Chemical Corporation site is a 4.4-acre, inactive facility that formerly
manufactured acid chlorides and flame retardant compounds. The site is located in a heavily
populated and industrialized area of Newark, Essex County, New Jersey. The site consists of
five major buildings and three smaller, facility support buildings. White Chemical Corporation
(WCC) operated the facility from 1983 until July 1990 when it ceased most operations.
During its operational years WCC was issued numerous violations of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy (NJDEPE). Initially the EPA found over 10,000 55-gallon drums and
other containers of hazardous substances precariously stacked or in other ways improperly
stored throughout the site. Drums and other containers were found in various stages of
deterioration, fuming or leaking their contents onto the soil. Other containers found on the
site included 150 gas cylinders; 126 storage tanks, vats, and process reactors; hundreds of
fiberpack drums; glass and plastic bottles; carboys; and boxes. In addition, an on-site
laboratory was found to contain approximately 12,000 laboratory-size containers haphazardly
stored on structurally unsound shelving, or stacked in piles on the floor. Site conditions
suggest that the present unstable situation could lead to a catastrophic release of hazardous
material that would likely affect the surrounding community. Mixtures of incompatible
substances can lead to fire, explosion or release of vapors. Improper storage of incompatible
substances on site could result in a rapidly spreading fire upon uncontrolled release, which
could involve large quantities of flammable and toxic materials and result in a significant
airborne release of toxic organic and inorganic chemicals. Approximately 12,000 people live
and work within a one-quarter mile radius of the site. Exposed or potentially exposed
populations include nearby residents, workers, trespassers, fire-fighting personnel and railway
commuters. The predominant route of exposure is inhalation for all of the exposed
populations, and direct contact for trespassers or fire-fighting personnel.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal actions.
Final Date. 09/25/91
255 March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic adverse health effects have been associated
with many of the contaminants identified on the site. Many of the substances will
react upon contact with moisture or air, forming toxic and irritating substances. A
catastrophic release would likely cause the generation of a plume that could
contain hazardous concentrations of acid gases, or irritating and toxic substances
which would significantly endanger the public and workers in the area.
Chronic inhalation of or direct contact with site contaminants could pose a serious
health threat.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: emergency actions and two long-term remedial
phases focusing on the cleanup of the surface contamination and of the remaining areas.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: A removal action to stabilize the site was initiated by
NJDEPE in 1990, under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act.
However, later in 1990, after removing 1,000 drums, NJDEPE requested that the
EPA consider taking an interim cleanup action at the site. The EPA initiated its removal
action late 1990, which included drum overpacking, separating incompatible substances,
sampling chemicals, and further assessing the nature of the chemicals present.
Surface Contamination: In 1991, the EPA selected a remedy for the surface
contamination at the site, which includes the tanks, drums, vats, laboratory-size
containers and other containers. The selected remedy is a continuation of the
initial actions which were initiated in 1990. To date, 4,200 empty drums have been shipped off
the site; the remaining 6,700 have been staged, sampled and remain on the site. All of the
126 tanks have been inventoried; all laboratory-size containers have been staged and
segregated; shock-sensitive material has been isolated. Off-site disposal to approved EPA
facilities and recycling of material has begun. It is expected that all material will be removed
off the site by the end of the summer of 1992.
Remaining Areas: Once the cleanup of the surface contamination is
completed, the EPA plans to conduct a detailed investigation at the site for other
possibly contaminated media (e.g., groundwater, surface water, soil, and
buildings).
Site Facts: In May 1992, three potentially responsible parties, under an Unilateral
Administrative Order, agreed to participate in the cleanup of the surface contamination at
the site. The EPA will remove all the drums and its contents off site and the potentially
responsible parties will perform the remaining cleanup work.
March 1992 256 WHITE CHEMICAL CORPORATION
-------
Environmental Progress
The EPA is presently maintaining 24-hour security at the inactive facility and is continuing to
perform response activities. On-going actions addressing the surface contamination have
reduced the threat of exposure to hazardous materials while future investigations addressing
other possibly contaminated media are being planned.
Site Repository
Not established.
WHITE CHEMICAL CORPORATION
257
March 1992
-------
Site Description
WILLIAMS
NEW JERSEY \ <>%~ Swainton
EPA ID# NJD980529945
The Williams Property site is a 6-acre abandoned hazardous waste dump on wooded land in
Swainton. Approximately 200 drums of liquid hazardous wastes were disposed of at the site in
1979. Waste solvents currently are stored in drums and tanks on the site. Soils and
groundwater have been contaminated with high concentrations of toxic and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). The area is sparsely populated, although a residence stands on the site.
This home's well is contaminated and has been closed since 1985. The remaining residences
along the Sigetown Road have been provided with a municipal water supply. The private wells
at these homes are no longer in use. Surface water bodies in the vicinity are used for
recreation, and more than 60 people depend on groundwater for drinking supplies.
Groundwater contaminant levels have been decreasing since the initial disposal of wastes.
The site and its surroundings are used primarily for residential purposes; about eight families
live in the area. Municipal and private wells servicing about 4,900 people lie within 3 miles of
the site. Groundwater is used for crop irrigation.
c-* D AM-h-r* TU- v • u • AA A^ u NpL LISTING HISTORY
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through Proposed Date- 12/30/82
Federal and State actions. Final Date. 09/03/83
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater on the site is contaminated with VOCs and metals. On-site soil
contains phthalates, a plastics by-product, and VOCs including xylene and
methylene chloride. Nearby residents have been connected to the municipal water
supply and, therefore, are no longer threatened by the contaminated groundwater.
However, the contaminant plume is migrating toward other wells in the area.
People who ingest or come into direct contact with the polluted water or
hazardous waste may be at risk. The site is in a rural, agricultural region near
coastal wetlands and wildlife management areas that could be subject to
contamination from the site runoff.
258 March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in two stages: initial actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: In 1980, the State removed about 1,200 cubic yards of
contaminated sludge and soil. Continued evidence of groundwater contamination
forced the closing of the Williams well in 1985. Several contaminated drums and
cylinders have been removed to off-site EPA-approved locations for disposal.
Entire Site: The EPA selected a remedy for cleanup of the entire site in 1987
that included: extracting and treating contaminated groundwater and discharging
the cleaned water to the underlying aquifer; excavating contaminated soils and
removing the soils to an off-site disposal facility for incineration; backfilling the excavation
with clean soil, regrading it, and revegetating it; and providing an alternate water supply to
nearby residents with polluted wells. Portions of the final cleanup remedy have been
conducted by the EPA. Approximately 1,500 tons of contaminated soils were excavated and
transported to a facility in South Carolina to be treated by incineration, with the ash to be
reused as a cement aggregate. Restoration and revegetation activities of the excavation area
were completed in the spring of 1991. In addition, 55-gallon drums, 5-gallon pails, and
compressed gas cylinders found on the property were disposed of and warning signs and
security gates were installed to restrict access to the site.
Site Facts: In 1984, the parties potentially responsible for the contamination notified the
EPA of their willingness to conduct a study of the site. The potentially responsible parties
filed suit against the EPA and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy, seeking to enjoin the agencies from spending any monies for the study. In 1985, the
scope of work submitted by the potentially responsible parties was found to be inadequate.
The EPA informed the potentially responsible parties that they will not perform the study,
and further negotiations will not occur. Both the State and the EPA currently are involved in
cost recovery litigation with a potentially responsible party.
Environmental Progress
Removal of contaminated sludge and soil and the completion of most of the final remedy has
reduced the potential for exposure to hazardous materials while remaining groundwater
cleanup activities take place at the site.
WILLIAMS PROPERTY 259 March 1992
-------
Site Repository
Cape May County Public Library, Cape May Court House, Mechanic Street,
Cape May, NJ 08210
March 1992
260
WILLIAMS PROPERTY
-------
WILSON FARM
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980532824
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Ocean County
Plumsted Township
Other Names:
Thlokol Corporation
The 438-acre Wilson Farm site is one of seven similar "Plumsted" sites located within 20
square miles of Plumsted Township. Four of these sites are listed on the NPL. Through an
agreement with the site owner, Thiokol Chemical Company allegedly disposed of bulk liquid
and drummed wastes on 10 acres of this site. The wastes were dumped on the surface in the
late 1960s and early 1970s; there is no evidence of buried materials. Inorganic chemicals were
found in drinking wells near the site in 1987. The site is not fenced or posted, and there is
evidence that the area is used for hunting and recreation. Approximately 1,900 people live
within a 3-mile radius of the site, and 300 people live within a mile. The residents rely on
private wells for drinking supplies. The closest drinking water well sampled was approximately
1,500 feet from the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), pesticides, and heavy metals were detected in
groundwater and stream sediments. Surface and subsurface soils are contaminated
with VOCs and heavy metals. Contaminated surface water and groundwater may
pose a threat to public health if used for recreational activities or for a drinking
water source. Contaminants found at the site may pose a threat to Borden's Run
Creek, Collier's Mill Lake, and a wildlife refuge.
261
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
This site is being addressed in two stages: emergency actions and a long-term remedial phase
focusing on cleanup of the entire site.
Response Action Status
Emergency Actions: In 1980, New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) workers installed six groundwater monitoring
wells, removed drums, and excavated and removed sludge, solid wastes, and
approximately 620 cubic yards of contaminated soil. In addition, the party potentially
responsible for site contamination is scheduled to perform other interim cleanup actions
during 1992 which will address surface waste at the site.
Entire Site: In 1987, the NJDEPE began an intensive study of the remaining
water and soil pollution at the site. This investigation is exploring the nature and
extent of contamination problems and will recommend the best strategies for final
cleanup. It is scheduled for completion in 1992.
Environmental Progress
The removal of drums and the excavation and removal of sludge, solid wastes, and
contaminated soil have reduced the potential for exposure to contaminants at the Wilson
Farm site while further studies of site contamination are taking place.
Site Repository
Ocean County Library, Main Library, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ 08753
March 1992 262 WILSON FARM
-------
WITCO CHE
CORP.
(OAKLAND PLA
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD045653854
Site Description
EPA REGION 2
Bergen County
Oakland
The Witco Chemical Corp. (Oakland Plant) operates a technical research facility for the
development of specialty chemicals at this 9-acre site on Bauer Drive in Oakland. From 1966
through 1984, the company neutralized laboratory wastewater in an underground tank and
then discharged it into a network of six unlined subsurface seepage pits. This network lies in
an aquifer used for domestic and industrial purposes. The New Jersey State Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy (NJDEPE) inspected the operation in 1982. Petroleum
hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in soil and groundwater
samples. The operation is located in an industrial park. It is bordered by Hopper Lake, a
recreational water body, and a housing development. Approximately 43,000 people live within
a 3-mile radius of the site, and 5,000 live within 1 mile. The entire population draws its
drinking water supplies from either municipal or private wells that tap the aquifer of concern.
A freshwater wetland lies within a mile of the site, and Franklin Lake, used for recreation, is
3 miles downstream.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 06/24/88
Final Date: 10/04/89
Threats and Contaminants
Groundwater contained petroleum hydrocarbons, the VOCs toluene and ethyl
benzene, and carbon disulfide and phthalates. Soil was contaminated with
pesticides including dieldrin, DDE, and DDT and the heavy metals mercury,
cadmium, and lead. The seepage pit samples revealed the presence of high levels
of petroleum hydrocarbons and other organic and inorganic contaminants.
263
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed through initial actions; further investigations showed that no other
cleanup actions are required.
Response Action Status
Initial Actions: Under a 1982 directive from the NJDEPE, Witco began cleanup
operations. The company installed a 6,000-gallon fiberglass tank to receive
laboratory waste. This completely eliminated any subsurface discharges by early
1984. A separate system for discharging uncontaminated cooling waters into a nearby lake
has been established under a State environmental permit. In 1987, Witco started its own
independent soil cleanup. Workers removed remaining sludges, contaminated soil, and various
pieces of discharge equipment. They backfilled and closed the excavation by 1988.
Entire Site: To ensure that Witco's cleanup meets standards, the EPA ordered
the company to conduct a study of any remaining contamination. In 1992, Witco
completed further groundwater and soil investigations to determine the nature and
extent of any remaining contamination present on site. Based on the results of the
investigations, the EPA determined that the initial actions conducted by the potentially
responsible party have reduced contamination to within safety levels. A residential well
situated between the site and the Town water supply wells will be monitored once a year for
the next five years to ensure the effectiveness of the remedies.
Site Facts: Pursuant to a July 1982 State directive, Witco deactivated its seepage pit system
and performed a hydrogeologic investigation. In August 1989, Witco entered into an
Administrative Order with the EPA for the performance of an investigation of the site.
Environmental Progress
The initial actions completed by the potentially responsible party have eliminated the threat
of exposure to contamination at the Witco Chemical Corp. (Oakland Plant) site. The EPA
has determined that no further cleanup actions are needed at the site while monitoring
continues for the next five years.
Site Repository
Free Public Library of Oakland, Municipal Plaza, Oakland, NJ 07436
March 1992 264 WITCO CHEMICAL CORP.
(OAKLAND PLANT)
-------
WOODLAND
ROUTE 532
DUMP
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505887
EPA REGION 2
Burlington County
Woodland Township
Site Description
The Woodland Route 532 Dump site is an inactive chemical waste dump covering about 20
acres along Route 532. Illegal dumping started after nearby residents forced abandonment of
an almost identical site along Route 72 about 2 miles away from the Woodland Route 72
dump, which also is on the NPL. Several chemical companies disposed of wastes here from
1956 until the mid-1960s, dumping, burning, and burying drummed and bulk materials. The
site contains several sludge mounds and numerous sandy depressions containing drums. The
area around the site is sparsely populated. One private residence is located within a 3-mile
radius of the dump, and 900 people live within 4 miles. The closest residences rely on private
well water. The site is located within the Preservation Area District of the New Jersey
Pinelands. Goodwater Run, an intermittent stream, borders the site to the east. An active
cranberry bog is located 4,000 feet to the southwest. The local cranberry producers use the
surface waters to flood the cranberry bogs.
Site Responsibility:
This site is being addressed through
Federal, State, and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
Threats and Contaminants
ZGJ
Groundwater and soil are contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
semi-volatiles, heavy metals, and pesticides. Goodwater Run contains elevated
levels of the heavy metals zinc and lead. Sub-surface soils are contaminated with
VOCs, metals, and semi-volatiles. Hazardous waste disposal areas are covered with
a sand layer. This may pose a physical danger to trespassers who come into contact
with the wastes. People may be at risk from direct contact with contaminated
sludge, soil, surface water or sediments. People who drink contaminated
groundwater also may be at risk. Pollutants from the site may be harmful to
wildlife inhabiting the Pinelands National Reserve.
265
March 1992
-------
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases directed at cleanup of the soil and groundwater and cleanup of the sub-surface soils.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1986, a security fence was constructed to restrict site
access.
Soil and Groundwater Contamination: The State concluded a study of soil
and groundwater pollution at the site in 1989. In 1990, the EPA selected the
cleanup remedy, which involves excavating all contaminated surface materials and
disposing of them at an approved off-site facility, and installing a groundwater recovery
system consisting of air stripping, metals removal, biological treatment, and advanced
oxidation or carbon adsorption. By early 1991, waste materials were removed and disposed of
by the potentially responsible parties at an EPA-approved facility. Design of the groundwater
cleanup currently is underway.
Sub-surface Soils Contamination: In 1992, an investigation began to explore
the nature and extent of sub-surface soils contamination at the site. The study will
define the contaminants of concern and will recommend effective alternatives for
final cleanup. The investigation is expected to be completed in 1993. Once completed, the
EPA will evaluate the study findings and select a final remedy.
Site Facts: In 1991, an Administrative Order on Consent was signed between the State and
several potentially responsible parties. The parties agreed to pay for the groundwater
cleanup and perform a study on the sub-surface soils.
Environmental Progress
By constructing a fence to limit site access and removing a substantial amount of waste
materials, the EPA, the State, and the potentially responsible parties have reduced the
potential for exposure to hazardous materials on the Woodland Route 532 Dump site while
the final cleanup remedy for the groundwater is being designed and an investigation to
explore sub-surface soils contamination is underway.
Site Repository
Woodland Township Municipal Building, Main Street, Chatsworth, NJ 08019
March 1992
266
WOODLAND ROUTE 532 DUMP
-------
WOODLAND
ROUTE 72
DUMP
NEW JERSEY
EPA ID# NJD980505879
EPA REGION 2
Burlington County
Woodland Township
Other Names:
Manahawkin Site
Site Description
The Woodland Route 72 Dump site is a 12-acre industrial dump located along Route 72, just
2 miles away from an almost identical site on Route 532 called the Woodland Route 532
Dump site. Both sites are on the NPL; one residence lies between them. From the early
1950s to the mid-1960s, various wastes were brought to this uncontrolled disposal site in
55-gallon drums and in bulk transport. Records indicate that the wastes were dumped into
open pits and trenches and then burned. Investigations, however, reveal that substantial
amounts of these wastes were buried. In addition to numerous chemical contaminants in soil
and water, there are some areas of the site where gamma radiation exposure is greater than
the EPA-recommended action level. Active commercial cranberry bogs lie 1/2 mile northwest
of the site. Approximately 900 people live within a 4-mile radius of the site, and only one
private residence is located within a 3-mile radius. Land use in the area is limited to cranberry
and blueberry cultivation and harvesting of cedar and pine for wood products. Residents rely
on groundwater for drinking, household use, and irrigation; about 20 people use private wells
within 3 miles of the site. The closest well is 1 1/2 miles from the dump. There is no evidence
of well contamination. The site is located within the Pinelands National Reserve. Pope
Branch, an intermittent stream, is located approximately 500 feet to the north and 1,000 feet
west of the site. Wetlands are located approximately 1/4 mile southwest of the site.
Site Responsibility: This site is being addressed through
Federal, State and potentially
responsible parties' actions.
NPL LISTING HISTORY
Proposed Date: 09/08/83
Final Date: 09/21/84
267
March 1992
-------
Threats and Contaminants
ZGJ
Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
semi-volatiles, heavy metals, and pesticides. Two areas on the site have elevated
levels of gamma radioactivity (from thorium-232, radium-226, and uranium-238).
Off-site sediments contain lead. Surface and subsurface soils are contaminated with
metals, VOCs, semi-volatiles, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and the pesticide
DDT. Surface and subsurface sludge wastes contain a range of organic compounds,
including VOCs, acids, semi-volatiles, DDT, PCBs, and metals. Phenol and lead
have been detected in off-site surface water. A chain-link fence, installed in 1986,
may somewhat restrict site access, but there is evidence that children and adults
use the property for recreation. People may be at risk from direct contact with
contaminated sludge, soil, surface water or sediments. In addition, people who
drink contaminated groundwater may be at risk. Pollutants migrating from the site
may be harmful to wildlife inhabiting the Pinelands National Reserve.
Cleanup Approach
The site is being addressed in three stages: immediate actions and two long-term remedial
phases directed at cleanup of the soil and groundwater and cleanup of the sub-surface soils.
Response Action Status
Immediate Actions: In 1986, a security fence was constructed to restrict site
access.
Soil and Groundwater Contamination: The state conducted a study of soil
and groundwater pollution at the site in 1989. In 1990, the EPA selected the
cleanup remedy, which includes excavating all contaminated surface materials and
disposing of them at an approved off-site facility, and installing a groundwater treatment
system consisting of air stripping, metals removal, biological treatment, and advanced
oxidation or carbon adsorption. By early 1991, waste materials were removed and disposed of
by the potentially responsible parties at an EPA-approved facility. Design of the groundwater
cleanup remedy currently is underway.
Sub-surface Soil Contamination: In 1992, an investigation began to explore
the nature and extent of sub-surface soil contamination at the site. The study will
define the contaminants of concern and will recommend effective alternatives for
final cleanup. The investigation is expected to be completed in 1993. Once completed, the
EPA will evaluate the study findings and select a final remedy for final sub-surface soil
contamination.
March 1992 268 WOODLAND ROUTE 72 DUMP
-------
Site Facts: In 1991, an Administrative Order on Consent was signed between the State and
several potentially responsible parties. The parties agreed to pay for the groundwater cleanup
and to perform a study of the sub-surface soil contamination.
Environmental Progress
The construction of a fence to restrict site access and removal and disposal of contaminated
soil have reduced the threat of exposure to the public and the environment at the Woodland
Route 72 Dump Site while groundwater cleanup activities are being designed and an
investigation to explore sub-surface soils contamination is underway.
Site Repository
Woodland Township Municipal Building, Main Street, Chatsworth, NJ 08019
WOODLAND ROUTE 72 DUMP
269
March 1992
-------
GLOSSARY
Terms Used in the NPL Book
This glossary defines terms used throughout the NPL Volumes. The terms and
abbreviations contained in this glossary apply specifically to work performed
under the Superfund program in the context of hazardous waste management. These
terms may have other meanings when used in a different context. A table of common
toxic chemicals found at NPL sites, their sources, and their potential threats is located
on page G-15
Acids: Substances, characterized by low pH
(less than 7.0), that are used in chemical manu-
facturing. Acids in high concentration can be
very corrosive and react with many inorganic
and organic substances. These reactions possi-
bly may create toxic compounds or release
heavy metal contaminants that remain in the
environment long after the acid is neutralized.
Administrative Order On Consent: A
legal and enforceable agreement between the
EPA and the parties potentially responsible for
site contamination. Under the terms of the
Order, the potentially responsible parties (PRPs)
agree to perform or pay for site studies or
cleanups. It also describes the oversight rules,
responsibilities, and enforcement options that
the government may exercise in the event of
non-compliance by potentially responsible
parties. This Order is signed by PRPs and the
government; it does not require approval by a
judge.
Administrative Order [Unilateral]: A
legally binding document issued by the EPA,
directing the parties potentially responsible to
perform site cleanups or studies (generally, the
EPA does not issue Unilateral Orders for site
studies). This type of Order is not signed by the
PRPs and does not require approval by a judge.
Aeration: A process that promotes breakdown
of contaminants in soil or water by exposing
them to air.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Dis-
ease Registry (ATSDR): The Federal
agency within the U.S. Public Health Service
charged with carrying out the health-related
responsibilities of CERCLA.
Air Stripping: A process whereby volatile
organic chemicals (VOCs) are removed from
contaminated material by forcing a stream of air
through the contaminated material in a pressur-
ized vessel. The contaminants are evaporated
into the air stream. The air may be further
treated before it is released into the atmosphere.
Ambient Air: Any unconfined part of the
atmosphere. Refers to the air that may be
inhaled by workers or residents in the vicinity of
contaminated air sources.
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Requirements (ARARs): Federal, State, or
local laws which apply to Superfund activities at
NPL sites. Both emergency and long-term
actions must comply with these laws or provide
sound reasons for allowing a waiver. ARARs
must be identified for each site relative to the
characteristics of the site, the substances found
at the site, or the cleanup alternatives being
considered for the site.
G-1
-------
GLOSSARY
Aquifer: An underground layer of rock, sand,
or gravel capable of storing water within cracks
and pore spaces, or between grains. When
water contained within an aquifer is of sufficient
quantity and quality, it can be tapped and used
for drinking or other puiposes. The water
contained in the aquifer is called ground water.
A "sole source aquifer" supplies 50 percent or
more of the drinking water of an area.
Artesian (Well): A well made by drilling into
the earth until water is reached, which, due to
internal pressure, flows up like a fountain.
Asbestos: A mineral fiber that can pollute air
or water and is known to cause cancer or
asbestosis when inhaled.
Attenuation: The naturally occurring process
by which a compound is reduced in concentra-
tion over time through adsorption, degradation,
dilution, or transformation.
Background Level: The amount of a sub-
stance typically found in the air, water, or soil
from natural, as opposed to human, sources.
Baghouse Dust: Dust accumulated in
removing particulates from the air by passing it
through cloth bags in an enclosure.
Bases: Substances characterized by high pH
(greater than 7.0), which tend to be corrosive in
chemical reactions. When bases are mixed with
acids, they neutralize each other, forming salts.
Berm: A ledge, wall, or a mound of earth used
to prevent the migration of contaminants.
Bioaccumulate: The process by which some
contaminants or toxic chemicals gradually
collect and increase in concentration in living
tissue, such as in plants, fish, or people, as they
breathe contaminated air, drink contaminated
water, or eat contaminated food.
Biological Treatment: The use of bacteria
or other microbial organisms to break down
toxic organic materials into carbon dioxide and
water.
Bioremediation: A cleanup process using
naturally occurring or specially cultivated
microorganisms to digest contaminants and
break them down into non-hazardous compo-
nents.
Bog: A type of wetland that is covered with
peat moss deposits. Bogs depend primarily on
moisture from the air for their water source, are
usually acidic, and are rich in plant residue [see
Wetland].
Boom: A floating device used to contain oil
floating on a body of water or to restrict the
potential overflow of waste liquids from
containment structures.
Borehole: A hole that is drilled into the
ground and used to sample soil or ground-water.
Borrow Pit: An excavated area where soil,
sand, or gravel has been dug up for use else-
where.
Cap: A layer of material, such as clay or a
synthetic material, used to prevent rainwater
from penetrating and spreading contaminated
materials. The surface of the cap generally is
mounded or sloped so water will drain off,
Carbon Adsorption: A treatment system in
which contaminants are removed from ground-
water and surface water by forcing water
through tanks containing activated carbon, a
specially treated material that attracts and holds
or retains contaminants.
Carbon DJSUlfide: A degreasing agent
formerly used extensively for parts washing.
This compound has both inorganic and organic
G-2
-------
GLOSSARY
properties, which increase cleaning efficiency.
However, these properties also cause chemical
reactions that increase the hazard to human
health and the environment.
Carbon Treatment: [see Carbon Adsorp-
tion].
Cell: In solid waste disposal, one of a series of
holes in a landfill where waste is dumped,
compacted, and covered with layers of dirt.
CERCLA: [see Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act].
Characterization: The sampling, monitoring,
and analysis of a site to determine the extent and
nature of toxic releases. Characterization
provides the basis for acquiring the necessary
technical information to develop, screen, ana-
lyze, and select appropriate cleanup techniques.
Chemical Fixation: The use of chemicals to
bind contaminants, thereby reducing the poten-
tial for leaching or other movement.
Chromated Copper Arsenate: An insecti-
cide/herbicide formed from salts of three toxic
metals: copper, chromium, and arsenic. This
salt is used extensively as a wood preservative
in pressure-treating operations. It is highly toxic
and water-soluble, making it a relatively mobile
contaminant in the environment.
Cleanup: Actions taken to eliminate a release
or threat of release of a hazardous substance.
The term "cleanup" sometimes is used inter-
changeably with the terms remedial action,
removal action, response action, or corrective
action.
Closure: The process by which a landfill stops
accepting wastes and is shut down under Federal
guidelines that ensure the protection of the
public and the environment.
Comment Period: A specific interval during
which the public can review and comment on
various documents and EPA actions related to
site cleanup. For example, a comment period is
provided when the EPA proposes to add sites to
the NPL. Also, there is minimum 3-week
comment period for community members to
review and comment on the remedy proposed to
clean up a site.
Community Relations: The EPA effort to
establish and maintain two-way communication
with the public. The goals of community
relations programs include creating an under-
standing of EPA programs and related actions,
assuring public input into decision-making
processes related to affected communities, and
making certain that the Agency is aware of, and
responsive to, public concerns. Specific com-
munity relations activities are required in
relation to Superfund cleanup actions [see
Comment Period].
Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA): Congress enacted the
CERCLA, known as Superfund, in 19X0 to
respond directly to hazardous waste problems
that may pose a threat to the public health and
the environment. The EPA administers the
Superfund program.
Confluence: The place where two bodies of
water, such as streams or rivers, come together.
Confined Aquifer: An aquifer in which
groundwater is confined under pressure that is
significantly greater than atmospheric pressure.
G-3
-------
GLOSSARY
Consent Decree: A legal document ap-
proved and issued by a judge, formalizing an
agreement between the EPA and the parties
potentially responsible for site contamination.
The decree describes cleanup actions that the
potentially responsible parties are required to
perform, or the costs incurred by the govern-
ment that the parties will reimburse, and the
roles, responsibilities, and enforcement options
that the government may exercise in the event of
non-compliance by potentially responsible
parties. If a settlement between the EPA and a
potentially responsible party includes cleanup
actions, it must be in the form of a Consent
Decree. A Consent Decree is subject to a public
comment period.
Consent Order: [see Administrative Order
on Consent].
Containment: The process of enclosing or
containing hazardous substances in a structure,
typically in a pond or a lagoon, to prevent the
migration of contaminants into the environment.
Contaminant: Any physical, chemical,
biological, or radiological material or substance
whose quantity, location, or nature produces
undesirable health or environmental effects.
Contingency Plan: A document setting
out an organized, planned, and coordinated
course of action to be followed in case of a
fire, explosion, or other accident that releases
toxic chemicals, hazardous wastes, or radioac-
tive materials into the environment.
Cooperative Agreement: A contract
between the EPA and the States, wherein a State
agrees to manage or monitor certain site cleanup
responsibilities and other activities on a cost-
sharing basis.
Cost Recovery: A legal process by which
potentially responsible parties can be required
to pay back the Superfund program for money
it spends on any cleanup actions [see Poten-
tially Responsible Parties].
Cover: Vegetation or other material placed
over a landfill or other waste material. It can
be designed to reduce movement of water into
the waste and to prevent erosion that could
cause the movement of contaminants.
Creosotes: Chemicals used in wood pre-
serving operations and produced by distilla-
tion of tar, including polycyciic aromatic
hydrocarbons and polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons [see PAHs and PNAs]. Con-
taminating sediments, soils, and surface
water, creosotes may cause skin ulcerations
and cancer through prolonged exposure.
Culvert: A pipe used for drainage under a
road, railroad track, path, or through an embank-
ment.
Decommission: To revoke a license to
operate and take out of service.
Degradation: The process by which a chemi-
cal is reduced to a less complex form.
Degrease: To remove grease from wastes,
soils, or chemicals, usually using solvents.
Deletion: A site is eligible for deletion from
the NPL when Superfund response actions at the
site are complete. A site is deleted from the
NPL when a notice is published in the Federal
Register.
De minimis: This legal phrase pertains to
settlements with parties who contributed small
amounts of hazardous waste to a site. This
process allows the EPA to settle with small, or
de minimis contributors, as a single group rather
than as individuals, saving time, money, and
effort.
Dewater: To remove water from wastes, soils,
or chemicals.
G-4
-------
GLOSSARY
Dike: A low wall that can act as a barrier to
prevent a spill from spreading.
Dioxin: An organic chemical by-product of
pesticide manufacture which is known to be one
of the most toxic man-made chemicals.
Disposal: Final placement or destruction of
toxic, radioactive, or other wastes; surplus or
banned pesticides or other chemicals; polluted
soils; and drums containing hazardous materials.
Disposal may be accomplished through the use
of approved secure landfills, surface impound-
ments, land fanning, deep well injection, or
incineration.
Downgradient: A downward hydrologic
slope that causes groundwater to move toward
lower elevations. Therefore, wells downgradi-
ent of a contaminated groundwater source are
prone to receiving pollutants.
Ecological Assessment: A study of the
impact of man-made or natural activity on living
creatures and their environment
Effluent: Wastewater, treated or untreated,
that flows out of a treatment plant, sewer, or
industrial outfall. Generally refers to wastes
discharged into surface waters.
Emission: Pollution discharged into the
atmosphere from smokestacks, other vents, and
surface areas of commercial or industrial facili-
ties.
Emulsifiers: Substances that help in mixing
materials that do not normally mix; e.g., oil and
water.
Endangerment Assessment: A study
conducted to determine the risks posed to public
health or the environment by contamination at
NPL sites. The EPA or the State conducts the
study when a legal action is to be taken to direct
the potentially responsible parties to clean up a
site or pay for the cleanup. An endangerment
assessment supplements an investigation of the
site hazards.
Enforcement: EPA, State, or local legal
actions taken against parties to facilitate
settlements; to compel compliance with laws,
rules, regulations, or agreements; or to obtain
penalties or criminal sanctions for violations.
Enforcement procedures may vary, depending
on the specific requirements of different
environmental laws and related regulatory
requirements. Under CERCLA, for example,
the EPA will seek to require potentially
responsible parties to clean up a Superfund
site or pay for the cleanup [see Cost Recov-
ery].
Erosion: The wearing away of land surface
by wind or water. Erosion occurs naturally
from weather or surface runoff, but can be
intensified by such land-related practices as
fanning, residential or industrial develop-
ment, road building, or timber-cutting. Ero-
sion may spread surface contamination to off-
site locations.
Estuary (estuarine): Areas where fresh
water from rivers and salt water from
nearshore ocean waters are mixed. These
areas may include bays, mouths of rivers, salt
marshes, and lagoons. These water ecosys-
tems shelter and feed marine life, birds, and
wildlife.
Evaporation Ponds: Areas where sewage
sludge or other watery wastes are dumped and
allowed to dry out.
Feasibility Study: The analysis of the
potential cleanup alternatives for a site. The
feasibility study usually starts as soon as the
remedial investigation is underway. In this
volume, the feasibility study is referred to as a
site study [see also Remedial Investigation].
G-5
-------
GLOSSARY
Filtration: A treatment process for remov-
ing solid (participate) matter from water by
passing the water through sand, activated
carbon, or a man-made filter. The process is
often used to remove particles that contain
contaminants.
Flood Plain: An area along a river, formed
from sediment deposited by floods. Flood
plains periodically are innundated by natural
floods, which can spread contamination.
Flue Gas: The air that is emitted from a
chimney after combustion in the burner
occurs. The gas can include nitrogen oxides,
carbon oxides, water vapor, sulfur oxides,
particles, and many chemical pollutants.
Fly Ash: Non-combustible residue that results
from the combustion of flue gases. It can
include nitrogen oxides, carbon oxides, water
vapor, sulfur oxides, as well as many other
chemical pollutants.
French Drain System: A crushed rock drain
system constructed of perforated pipes, which is
used to drain and disperse wastewater.
Gasification (coal): The conversion of soft
coal into gas for use as a fuel.
General Notice Letter: [See Notice Letter].
Generator: A facility that emits pollutants
into the air or releases hazardous wastes into
water or soil.
Good Faith Offer: A voluntary offer, gener-
ally in response to a Special Notice letter, made
by a potentially responsible party, consisting of
a written proposal demonstrating a potentially
responsible party's qualifications and willing-
ness to perform a site study or cleanup.
Groundwater: Water that fills pores in soils
or openings in rocks to the point of saturation.
In aquifers, groundwater occurs in sufficient
quantities for use as drinking and irrigation
water and other purposes.
Groundwater Quality Assessment: The
process of analyzing the chemical characteris-
tics of groundwater to determine whether any
hazardous materials exist.
Halogens: Reactive non-metals, such as
chlorine and bromine. Halogens are very
good oxidizing agents and, therefore, have
many industrial uses. They are rarely found
by themselves; however, many chemicals
such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
some volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
and dioxin are reactive because of the pres-
ence of halogens.
Hazard Ranking System (HRS): The
principal screening tool used by the EPA to
evaluate relative risks to public health and the
environment associated with abandoned or
uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The HRS
calculates a score based on the potential of
hazardous substances spreading from the site
through the air, surface water, or groundwater
and on other factors such as nearby popula-
tion. The HRS score is the primary factor in
deciding if the site should be on the NPL.
Hazardous Waste: By-products of society
that can pose a substantial present or potential
hazard to human health and the environment
when improperly managed. Hazardous waste
possesses at least one of four characteristics
(ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxic-
ity), or appears on special EPA lists.
Heavy Metals: Metallic elements with high
atomic weights, such as arsenic, lead, mercury,
and cadmium. Heavy metals are very hazardous
even at low concentrations and tend to accumu-
late in the food chain.
Herbicide: A chemical pesticide designed to
control or destroy plants, weeds, or grasses.
G-6
-------
GLOSSARY
Hot Spot: An area or vicinity of a site contain-
ing exceptionally high levels of contamination.
Hydrocarbons: Chemical compounds that
consist entirely of hydrogen and carbon.
Hydrology: The properties, distribution, and
circulation of water.
Hydrogeology: The geology of groundwater,
with particular emphasis on the chemistry and
movement of water.
Impoundment: A body of water or sludge
confined by a dam, dike, floodgate, or other
barrier.
Incineration: A group of treatment technolo-
gies involving destruction of waste by controlled
burning at high temperatures, e.g., burning
sludge to reduce the remaining residues to a
non-burnable ash that can be disposed of safely
on land, in some waters, or in underground
locations.
Infiltration: The movement of water or
other liquid down through soil from precipita-
tion (rain or snow) or from application of
wastewater to the land surface.
Influent: Water, wastewater, or other liquid
flowing into a reservoir, basin, or treatment
plant.
Injection Well: A well into which waste
fluids are placed, under pressure, for purposes
of disposal.
Inorganic Chemicals: Chemical sub
stances of mineral origin, not of basic carbon
structure.
Installation Restoration Program: The
specially funded program established in 1978
under which the Department of Defense has
been identifying and evaluating its hazardous
waste sites and controlling the migration of
hazardous contaminants from those sites.
Intake: The source from where a water supply
is drawn, such as from a river or water body.
Interagency Agreement: A written agree-
ment between the EPA and a Federal agency
that has the lead for site cleanup activities,
setting forth the roles and responsibilities of the
agencies for performing and overseeing the
activities. States often are parties to interagency
agreements.
Interim (Permit) Status: Conditions under
which hazardous waste treatment, storage,
and disposal facilities, that were operating
when regulations under the RCRA became
final in 1980, are temporarily allowed by the
EPA to continue to operate while awaiting
denial or issuance of a permanent permit. The
facility must comply with certain regulations
to maintain interim status.
Lagoon: A shallow pond or liquid waste
containment structure. Lagoons typically are
used for the storage of wastewaters, sludges,
liquid wastes, or spent nuclear fuel.
Landfarm: To apply waste to land or incor-
porate waste into the surface soil, such as
fertilizer or soil conditioner. This practice
commonly is used for disposal of composted
wastes and sludges.
Landfill: A disposal facility where waste is
placed in or on land. Sanitary landfills are
disposal sites for non-hazardous solid wastes.
The waste is spread in layers, compacted to the
smallest practical volume, and covered with soil
at the end of each operating day. Secure chemi-
cal landfills are disposal sites for hazardous
waste. They are designed to minimize the
chance of release of hazardous substances into
the environment [see Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act].
Leach, Leaching [v.t.]: The process by
which soluble chemical components are dis-
solved and carried through soil by water or
some other percolating liquid.
G-7
-------
GLOSSARY
Leachate [n]: The liquid that trickles through
or drains from waste, carrying soluble compo-
nents from the waste.
Leachate Collection System: A system
that gathers liquid that has leaked into a landfill
or other waste disposal area and pumps it to the
surface for treatment.
Liner: A relatively impermeable barrier
designed to prevent leachate (waste residue)
from leaking from a landfill. Liner materials
include plastic and dense clay.
Long-term Remedial Phase: Distinct,
often incremental, steps that are taken to solve
site pollution problems. Depending on the
complexity, site cleanup activities can be
separated into several of these phases.
Long-term Response Action: An action
which requires a continuous period of on-site
activity before cleanup goals are achieved.
These actions typically include the extraction
and treatment of groundwater and monitoring
actions.
Marsh: A type of wetland that does not
contain peat moss deposits and is dominated by
vegetation. Marshes may be either fresh or
saltwater and tidal or non-tidal [see Wetland].
Migration: The movement of oil, gas, con-
taminants, water, or other liquids through porous
and permeable soils or rock.
Mill Tailings: [See Mine Tailings].
Mine Tailings: A fine, sandy residue left from
mining operations. Tailings often contain high
concentrations of lead, uranium, and arsenic or
other heavy metals.
Mitigation: Actions taken to improve site
conditions by limiting, reducing, or controlling
toxicity and contamination sources.
Modeling: A technique using a mathematical
or physical representation of a system or theory
that tests the effects that changes on system
components have on the overall performance of
the system.
Monitoring Wells: Special wells drilled at
specific locations within, or surrounding, a
hazardous waste site where groundwater can be
sampled at selected depths and studied to obtain
such information as the direction in which
groundwater flows and the types and amounts of
contaminates present.
National Priorities List (NPL): The
EPA's list of the most serious uncontrolled or
abandoned hazardous waste sites identified
for possible long-term cleanup under Super-
fund. The EPA is required to update the NPL
at least once a year.
Natural Attenuation: [See Attenuation].
Neutrals: Organic compounds that have a
relatively neutral pH, complex structure and,
due to their organic bases, are easily absorbed
into the environment. Water is the most
commonly known neutral, however, naphtha-
lene, pyrene, and trichlorobenzene also are
examples of neutrals.
Nitroaromatics: Common components of
explosive materials, which will explode if
activated by very high temperatures or pres-
sures; 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) is a
nitroaromatic.
Notice Letter: A General Notice Letter
notifies the parties potentially responsible for
site contamination of their possible liability. A
Special Notice Letter begins a 60-day formal
period of negotiation during which the EPA is
not allowed to start work at a site or initiate
enforcement actions against potentially respon-
sible parties, although the EPA may undertake
certain investigatory and planning activities.
G-8
-------
GLOSSARY
The 60-day period may be extended if the EPA
receives a good faith offer from the PRPs
within that period. [See also Good Faith Offer].
On-Scene Coordinator (OSC): The
predesignated EPA, Coast Guard, or Depart-
ment of Defense official who coordinates and
directs Superfund removal actions or Clean
Water Act oil- or hazardous-spill corrective
actions.
Operation and Maintenance: Activities
conducted at a site after a cleanup action is
completed to ensure that the cleanup or
containment system is functioning properly.
Organic Chemicals/Compounds:
Chemical substances containing mainly
carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
Outfall: The place where wastewater is
discharged into receiving waters.
Overpacking: Process used for isolating
large volumes of waste by jacketing or encap-
sulating waste to prevent further spread or
leakage of contaminating materials. Leaking
drums may be contained within oversized
barrels as an interim measure prior to removal
and final disposal.
Pentachlorophenol (PCP): A synthetic,
modified petrochemical that may be used as a
wood preservative because of its toxicity to
termites and fungi. It is a common component
of creosotes and can cause cancer.
Perched (ground water): Ground water
separated from another underlying body of
groundwater by a confining layer, often clay or
rock.
Percolation: The downward flow or filtering
of water or other liquids through subsurface
rock or soil layers, usually continuing down-
ward to groundwater.
Pesticide: A substance or mixture of sub-
stances intended to prevent, destroy, or repel any
pest. If misused, pesticides can accumulate in
the foodchain and contaminate the environment.
Petrochemicals: Chemical substances
produced from petroleum in refinery operations
and as fuel oil residues. These include
fluoranthene, chrysene, mineral spirits, and
refined oils. Petrochemicals are the bases from
which volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
plastics, and many pesticides are made. These
chemical substances often are toxic to humans
and the environment.
Phenols: Organic compounds that are used in
plastics manufacturing and are by-products of
petroleum refining, tanning, textile, dye, and
resin manufacturing. Phenols are highly poison-
ous.
Physical Chemical Separation: The
treatment process of adding a chemical to a
substance to separate the compounds for further
treatment or disposal.
Pilot Testing: A small-scale test of a pro-
posed treatment system in the field to determine
its ability to clean up specific contaminants.
Plugging: The process of stopping the flow of
water, oil, or gas into or out of the ground
through a borehole or well penetrating the
ground.
Plume: A body of contaminated groundwater
flowing from a specific source. The movement
of the groundwater is influenced by such factors
as local groundwater flow patterns, the character
of the aquifer in which groundwater is con-
tained, and the density of contaminants [see
Migration].
Pollution: Generally, the presence of matter
or energy whose nature, location, or quantity
produces undesired health or environmental
effects.
G-9
-------
GLOSSARY
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons or
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs):
PAHs, such as pyrene, are a group of highly
reactive organic compounds found in motor oil.
They are a common component of creosotes and
can cause cancer.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs): A
group of toxic chemicals used for a variety of
purposes including electrical applications,
carbonless copy paper, adhesives, hydraulic
fluids, microscope immersion oils, and caulking
compounds. PCBs also are produced in certain
combustion processes. PCBs are extremely
persistent in the environment because they are
very stable, non-reactive, and highly heat
resistant. Chronic exposure to PCBs is believed
to cause liver damage. It also is known to
bioaccumulate in fatty tissues. PCB use and
sale was banned in 1979 with the passage of the
Toxic Substances Control Act.
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PNAs): PNAs, such as naphthalene, and
biphenyls, are a group of highly reactive organic
compounds that are a common component of
creosotes, which can be carcinogenic.
Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC): A plastic made
from the gaseous substance vinyl chloride. PVC
is used to make pipes, records, raincoats, and
floor tiles. Health risks from high concentra-
tions of vinyl chloride include liver cancer and
lung cancer, as well as cancer of the lymphatic
and nervous systems.
Potable Water: Water that is safe for drink-
ing and cooking.
Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs):
Parties associated with a Superfund site who
may be liable for the cost of remedying the
release of hazardous substances. This may
include owners or operators of the site or trans-
porters who disposed of materials at the site.
PRPs may admit liability, or liability may be
determined by a court of law. PRPs may sign a
Consent Decree or Administrative Order on
Consent to participate in the site cleanup without
admitting liability.
Precipitation: The removal of solids from
liquid waste so that the solid and liquid portions
can be disposed of safely; the removal of
particles from airborne emissions. Electro-
chemical precipitation is the use of an anode or
cathode to remove the hazardous chemicals.
Chemical precipitation involves the addition of
some substance to cause the solid portion to
separate.
Preliminary Assessment: The process of
collecting and reviewing available information
about a known or suspected waste site or release
to determine if a threat or potential threat exists.
Pump and Treat: A groundwater cleanup
technique involving the extracting of contami-
nated groundwater from the subsurface and the
removal of contaminants, using one of several
treatment technologies.
Radionuclides: Elements, including radium
and uranium-235 and -238, which break down
and produce radioactive substances due to their
unstable atomic structure. Some are man-made,
and others are naturally occurring in the envi-
ronment. Radon, the gaseous form of radium,
decays to form alpha particle radiation, which
cannot be absorbed through skin. However, it
can be inhaled, which allows alpha particles to
affect unprotected tissues directly and thus cause
cancer. Radiation also occurs naturally through
the breakdown of granite.
RCRA: [See Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act].
Recharge Area: A land area where rainwater
saturates the ground and soaks through the earth
to reach an aquifer.
G-10
-------
GLOSSARY
Record of Decision (ROD): A public
document that explains which cleanup
alternative(s) will be used to clean up sites
listed on the NPL. It is based on information
generated during the remedial investigation
and feasibility study and consideration of
public comments and community concerns.
Recovery Wells: Wells used to withdraw
contaminants or contaminated groundwater.
Recycle: The process of minimizing waste
generation by recovering usable products that
might otherwise become waste.
Remedial Action (RA): The actual con-
struction or implementation phase of a
Superfund site cleanup following the remedial
design [see Cleanup].
Remedial Design: A phase of site cleanup
where engineers design the technical specifi-
cations for cleanup remedies and technolo-
gies.
Remedial Investigation: An in-depth
study designed to gather the data necessary to
determine the nature and extent of contamina-
tion at a Superfund site, establish the criteria
for cleaning up the site, identify the prelimi-
nary alternatives for cleanup actions, and
support the technical and cost analyses of the
alternatives. The remedial investigation is
usually done with the feasibility study. In this
volume, the remedial investigation is referred
to as a site study [see also Feasibility Study].
Remedial Project Manager (RPM): The
EPA or State official responsible for oversee-
ing cleanup actions at the site.
Remedy Selection: The selection of the
final cleanup strategy for the site. At the few
sites where the EPA has determined that
initial response actions have eliminated site
contamination, or that any remaining con-
tamination will be naturally dispersed without
further cleanup activities, a "No Action"
remedy is selected [see Record of Decision].
Removal Action: Short-term immediate
actions taken to address releases of hazardous
substances [see Cleanup].
Residual: The amount of a pollutant re-
maining in the environment after a natural or
technological process has taken place, e.g.,
the sludge remaining after initial wastewater
treatment, or the particulates remaining in air
after the air passes through a scrubber.
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA): A Federal law that established
a regulatory system to track hazardous sub-
stances from the time of generation to dis-
posal. The law requires safe and secure
procedures to be used in treating, transport-
ing, storing, and disposing of hazardous
substances. RCRA is designed to prevent
new, uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
Retention Pond: A small body of liquid
used for disposing of wastes and containing
overflow from production facilities. Some-
times retention ponds are used to expand the
capacity of such structures as lagoons the
store waste.
Runoff: The discharge of water over land
into surface water. It can carry pollutants
from the air and land and spread contaminants
from its source.
Scrubber: An air pollution control device
that uses a spray of water or reactant or a dry
process to trap pollutants in emissions.
Sediment: The layer of soil, sand, and
minerals at the bottom of surface waters such
as streams, lakes, and rivers, that absorbs
contaminants.
G-11
-------
GLOSSARY
Seeps: Specific points where releases of
liquid, usually leachate, form from waste
disposal areas, particularly along the lower
edges of landtills.
Seepage Pits: A hole, shaft, or cavity in
the ground used for the storage of liquids,
usually in the form of leachate, from waste
disposal areas. The liquid gradually leaves
the pit by moving through the surrounding
soil.
Septage: Residue remaining in a septic tank
after the treatment process.
Sinkhole: A hollow depression in the land
surface in which drainage collects; associated
with underground caves and passages that
facilitate the movement of liquids.
Site Characterization: The technical pro-
cess used to evaluate the nature and extent of
environmental contamination, which is neces-
sary for choosing and designing cleanup mea-
sures and monitoring their effectiveness.
Site Inspection: The collection of informa-
tion from a hazardous waste site to determine
the extent and severity of hazards posed by the
site. It follows, and is more extensive than, a
preliminary assessment. The purpose is to
gather information necessary to score the site,
using the Hazard Ranking System, and to
determine if the site presents an immediate
threat that requires a prompt removal action.
Slag: The fused refuse or dross separated
from a metal in the process of smelting.
Sludge: Semi-solid residues from industrial
or water treatment processes that may be
contaminated with hazardous materials.
Slurry Wall: Barriers used to contain the flow
of contaminated groundwater or subsurface
liquids. Slurry walls are constructed by digging
a trench around a contaminated area and filling
the trench with an impermeable material that
prevents water from passing through it. The
groundwater or contaminated liquids trapped
within the area surrounded by the slurry wall
can be extracted and treated.
Smelter: A facility that melts or fuses ore,
often with an accompanying chemical change,
to separate the metal. Emissions from smelters
are known to cause pollution.
Soil Gas: Gaseous elements and compounds
that occur in the small spaces between par-
ticles of soil. Such gases can move through
or leave the soil or rock, depending on
changes in pressure.
Soil Vapor Extraction: A treatment
process that uses vacuum wells to remove
hazardous gases from soil.
Soil Washing: A water-based process for
mechanically scrubbing soils in-place to remove
undesirable materials. There are two ap-
proaches: dissolving or suspending them in the
wash solution for later treatment by conven-
tional methods, and concentrating them into a
smaller volume of soil through simple particle
size separation techniques [see Solvent Extrac-
tion].
Stabilization: The process of changing an
active substance into inert, harmless material,
or physical activities at a site that act to limit
the further spread of contamination without
actual reduction of toxicity.
Solidification/Stabilization: A chemical
or physical reduction of the mobility of
hazardous constituents. Mobility is reduced
through the binding of hazardous constituents
into a solid mass with low permeability and
resistance to leaching.
G-12
-------
GLOSSARY
Solvent: A substance capable of dissolving
another substance to form a solution. The
primary uses of industrial solvents are as
cleaners for degreasing, in paints, and in
Pharmaceuticals. Many solvents are flam-
mable and toxic to varying degrees.
Solvent Extraction: A means of separating
hazardous contaminants from soils, sludges,
and sediment, thereby reducing the volume of
the hazardous waste that must be treated. It
generally is used as one in a series of unit
operations. An organic chemical is used to
dissolve contaminants as opposed to water-
based compounds, which usually are used in
soil washing.
Sorption: The action of soaking up or
attracting substances. It is used in many
pollution control systems.
Special Notice Letter: [See Notice Let-
ter].
Stillbottom: Residues left over from the
process of recovering spent solvents.
Stripping: A process used to remove volatile
contaminants from a substance [see Air Strip-
ping].
Sumps: A pit or tank that catches liquid
runoff for drainage or disposal.
Superf und: The program operated under the
legislative authority of the CERCLA and
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) to update and improve environ-
mental laws. The program has the authority to
respond directly to releases or threatened re-
leases of hazardous substances that may endan-
ger public health, welfare, or the environment.
The "Superfund" is a trust fund that finances
cleanup actions at hazardous waste sites.
Surge Tanks: A holding structure used to
absorb irregularities in flow of liquids, including
liquid waste materials.
Swamp: A type of wetland that is dominated
by woody vegetation and does not accumulate
peat moss deposits. Swamps may be fresh or
saltwater and tidal or non-tidal [see Wetlands].
Thermal Treatment: The use of heat to
remove or destroy contaminants from soil.
Treatability Studies: Testing a treatment
method on contaminated groundwater, soil, etc.,
to determine whether and how well the method
will work.
Trichloroethylene (TCE): A stable, color-
less liquid with a low boiling point. TCE has
many industrial applications, including use as
a solvent and as a metal degreasing agent.
TCE may be toxic to people when inhaled,
ingested, or through skin contact and can
damage vital organs, especially the liver [see
Volatile Organic Compounds].
Unilateral [Administrative] Order: [see
Administrative Order].
Upgradient: An upward hydrologic slope;
demarks areas that are higher than contaminated
areas and, therefore, are not prone to contamina-
tion by the movement of polluted groundwater.
Vacuum Extraction: A technology used to
remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from soils. Vacuum pumps are connected to a
series of wells drilled to just above the water
table. The wells are sealed tightly at the soil
surface, and the vacuum established in the soil
draws VOC-contaminated air from the soil
pores into the well, as fresh air is drawn down
from the surface of the soil.
G-13
-------
GLOSSARY
Vegetated Soil Cap: A cap constructed with
graded soils and seed for vegetative growth, to
prevent erosion [see Cap].
Vitrification: The process of electrically
melting wastes and soils or sludges to bind the
waste in a glassy, solid material more durable
than granite or marble and resistant to leaching.
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs):
VOCs are manufactured as secondary petro-
chemicals. They include light alcohols, acetone,
trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene,
dichloroethylene, benzene, vinyl chloride,
toluene, and methylene chloride. These poten-
tially toxic chemicals are used as solvents,
degreasers, paints, thinners, and fuels. Because
of their volatile nature, they readily evaporate
into the air, increasing the potential exposure to
humans. Due to their low water solubility,
environmental persistence, and widespread
industrial use, they are commonly found in soil
and groundwater.
Waste Treatment Plant: A facility that
uses a series of tanks, screens, filters, and
other treatment processes to remove pollut-
ants from water.
Wastewater: The spent or used water from
individual homes or industries.
Watershed: The land area that drains into a
stream or other water body.
Water Table: The upper surface of the
groundwater.
Weir: A barrier to divert water or other liquids.
Wetland: An area that is regularly saturated
by surface or groundwater and, under normal
circumstances, is capable of supporting
vegetation typically adapted for life in satu-
rated soil conditions. Wetlands are critical to
sustaining many species of fish and wildlife.
Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes,
and bogs. Wetlands may be either coastal or
inland. Coastal wetlands have salt or brackish
(a mixture of salt and fresh) water, and most
have tides, while inland wetlands are non-
tidal and freshwater. Coastal wetlands are an
integral component of estuaries.
Wildlife Refuge: An area designated for
the protection of wild animals, within which
hunting and fishing are either prohibited or
strictly controlled.
G-14
-------
GLOSSARY
Some Common Contaminants at NPL Sites
Category
Chemical Types
Sources
Potential Health
Threats*
Heavy Metafs
Volatile Organic
Compounds
(VOCs)
Pesticide*/
Herbicides
(PCBs)
Creosotes
Radiation
(Radionudkfes}
Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium,
Cadmium, Cobalt, Copper,
Chromium, Lead, Manga-
nese, Mercury, Nickel,
Silver, Selenium, Zinc
Trichloroethylene (TCE),
Perchloroethylene (PCE),
Acetone, Benzene,
Ketone, Methyl chloride,
Toluene, Vinyl Chloride,
Dichlorethylene
Chlordane, DDT 4-4, DDE,
Heptachlor, Aldrin, Endrin,
Atrazine, Dieldrin, Toxa-
phene
Polyaromatic hydrocar-
bons (PAHs), Polynuclear
aromatics (PNAs),
Phenolic Tars, Pentachlo-
rophenol (PCP)
Radium-226, Radon,
Uranium-235, Uranium-
238
Electroplating, batteries,
paint pigments, photogra-
phy, smelting, thermom-
eters, fluorescent lights,
solvent recovery
Solvents and degreasers,
gasoline octane enhanc-
ers, oils and paints, dry
cleaning fluids, chemical
manufacturing.
Agricultural applications,
pesticide and herbicide
production
Electric transformers and
capacitors, insulators and
coolants, adhesives,
caulking compounds,
carbonless copy paper,
hydraulic fluids.
Wood preserving, fossil
fuel combustion
Mine tailings, radium
products, natural decay of
granites
Tumors, cancers, and kidney,
brain, neurological, bone and
liver damage
Cancers, kidney and liver
damage, impairment of the
nervous system resulting in
sleepiness and headaches,
leukemia
Various effects ranging from
nausea to nervous disorders.
Dioxin is a common by-product
of the manufacture of pesti-
cides and is both highly toxic
and a suspected carcinogen.
Cancer and liver damage.
Cancers and skin ulcerations
with prolonged exposure
Cancer
Sources Toxic Chemicals—What They Are, How They Affect You (EPA, Region 5)
Glossary of Environmental Terms (EPA, 1988)
'The potential for risk due to these contaminants is linked to a number of factors; for example, the length and level of exposure
and environmental and health factors such as age.
US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1993 — 341-835' 83023
G-15
------- |