ECOREGIONS OF THE UPPER MIDWEST STATES
3                                                   by

^                                            James M. Omernik
v                               Environmental Research Laboratory -- Corvallis
                                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
J                                           200 S.W. 35th Street
j                                          Corvallis, Oregon 97333
5
                                                    and

                                              Alisa L. Gallant
                                     NSI Technology Services Corporation
                                        1600 S.W. Western Boulevard
                                           Corvallis, Oregon 97333
                                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                       Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
                                       77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
                                       Chicago, IL  60604-3590

-------
                                   DISCLAIMER
   The information in this document has been funded wholly by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency. It has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review,  and
it  has been approved  for publication as an EPA document.  Mention of trade  names or
commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                         11

-------
                                      ABSTRACT
   A map of ecoregions of the Upper Midwest States was compiled to give managers of aquatic
and terrestrial resources a better understanding of the regional patterns of attainable quality of
these resources.  The ecoregions represent areas that are relatively homogeneous in patterns of
combinations of factors including land use, land-surface form, potential natural vegetation, and
soils. Descriptions and photographs provide a synopsis of the major characteristics affecting and
distinguishing each ecoregion.  A synoptic approach, similar  to that used in defining the
ecoregions, is  also useful for applications  of the map.  Initial efforts to use the  framework are
at the State level of aquatic resource management and center on identifying attainable ranges in
chemical quality, biotic assemblages, and lake trophic condition.
                                           111

-------
                                     CONTENTS
Abstract	iii
Figures	v
Photographs	vi
Acknowledgement	vii

   1.  Background	1
   2.  Ecoregion Delineation	2
   3.  Ecoregion Descriptions	3
           Northern Glaciated Plains.	4
           Western Corn Belt Plains	6
           Red River Valley	9
           Northern Minnesota Wetlands	11
           Northern Lakes and Forests	14
           North Central Hardwood Forests	16
           Driftless Area	19
           Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains	21
           Central Corn Belt Plains	24
           Eastern Corn Belt Plains	26
           Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains	29
           Huron/Erie Lake Plain	32
           Erie/Ontario Lake Plain	34
           Western Allegheny  Plateau	37
           Interior Plateau	39
           Interior River Lowland	42
   4.  Applications	45
           Applications in Ohio	46
           Applications in Minnesota.	49

Literature Cited	54

-------
                                      FIGURES
Number                                                                     Page

1  Regional signatures of dominant fish species in Ohio streams.	47
2  Principal component axis I scores for nutrient richness and ionic strength
   variables sampled for Ohio streams	48
3  Total phosphorus values for Minnesota lakes	50
4  Nitrate-nitrite values for Minnesota streams	52

-------
                                   PHOTOGRAPHS

Number                                                                       Page
1  Northern Glaciated Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	4
2  Northern Glaciated Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	5
3  Northern Glaciated Plains Ecoregion, ground photograph	5
4  Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	7
5  Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	8
6  Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion, ground photograph	8
7  Red River Valley Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	9
8  Red River Valley Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	10
9  Red River Valley Ecoregion, ground photograph	10
10 Northern Minnesota Wetlands Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet. ...  12
11 Northern Minnesota Wetlands Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet. ...  13
12 Northern Minnesota Wetlands Ecoregion, ground photograph	13
13 Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	14
14 Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	15
15 Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion, ground photograph	15
16 North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet .  .  17
17 North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet .  .  18
18 North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion, ground photograph	18
19 Driftless Area Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	19
20 Driftless Area Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	20
21 Driftless Area Ecoregion, ground photograph.	20
22 Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000  feet.  .  22
23 Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000  feet.  .  23
24 Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains Ecoregion, ground  photograph.	23
25 Central Corn Belt Plains  Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	24
26 Central Corn Belt Plains  Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	25
27 Central Corn Belt Plains  Ecoregion, ground photograph	25
28 Eastern Corn Belt Plains  Ecoregion,  aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	27
29 Eastern Corn Belt Plains  Ecoregion,  aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	28
30 Eastern Corn Belt Plains  Ecoregion,  ground photograph	28
31 Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at
   5,000 feet	29
32 Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at
   2,000 feet	30
33 Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregion, ground photograph,  30
34 Huron/Erie Lake Plain Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	32
35 Huron/Erie Lake Plains Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	33
36 Huron/Erie Lake Plains Ecoregion, ground photograph	33
37 Erie/Ontario  Lake Plain  Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	35
38 Erie/Ontario  Lake Plain  Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	36
39 Erie/Ontario  Lake Plain  Ecoregion, ground photograph,	36
40 Western Allegheny  Plateau Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	37
41 Western Allegheny  Plateau Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	38
42 Western Allegheny  Plateau Ecoregion, ground photograph	38
43 Interior Plateau Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 5,000 feet	40
44 Interior Plateau Ecoregion, aerial photograph at 2,000 feet	41
45 Interior Plateau Ecoregion, ground photograph	41
46 Interior River Lowland Ecoregion, aerial photograph  at 5,000 feet	43
47 Interior River Lowland Ecoregion, aerial photograph  at 2,000 feet	44
48 Interior River Lowland Ecoregion, ground photograph	44

                                           vi

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
   The successful application of this map and its regional concept for resource management
should be credited to a number of people.  In the Upper Midwest region, State resource
managers, notably Daniel R.  Dudley and Christopher O. Yoder of the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency and Steven A.  Heiskary and Gary S. Fandrei of the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, promoted and implemented applications for management of resources and paved
the way for similar  work in other States. David P. Larsen and Robert M. Hughes played a
major role in the interaction between State and regional resource managers. Christina M. Rohm
and Thomas R. Whittier, along with  Larsen and Hughes, analyzed much of the data and
developed verification and application papers. We are especially indebted to Philip J. Gersmehl
for insightful review and revisions to the text.
                                         VII

-------
BACKGROUND

     Some   of  the   most  difficult   problems  facing  a  resource   manager  center  on
"representativeness" of data  and research  results, and "attainable" ecosystem conditions or
quality. Processes and relationships that are dominant in one part of the country are often less
important, even nonexistent, in other places. Interrelationships among natural and anthropogenic
factors vary, both spatially and temporally, in such a complex way that models  developed to
predict land use-resource quality relationships are of questionable value when applied outside the
specific area for which they were developed.   This complexity  precludes  formulation of
quantitative predictions without a prior qualitative understanding  of the regional patterns of
ecosystems.

     Ecoregions 1  of  the  United States were delineated  (Omernik 1987) to alleviate these
problems and to provide a geographic framework for more efficient management of ecosystems
and their components. Most  important, this spatial framework can establish a logical basis for
characterizing ranges of ecosystem conditions or qualities  that are realistically attainable. For
example, in regions of cultivated cropland, it is unrealistic to expect the present  quality of
water  and  land  resources  to be  the same as existed  before  major  human  settlement.
"Realistically attainable" depends on economically, culturally, and politically acceptable protective
measures  and  their  compatibility  with   regional  patterns  of natural  and anthropogenic
characteristics.

     Our approach for defining ecoregions  is based on the  hypothesis that ecosystems and their
components display regional patterns that  are reflected in spatially variable  combinations of
causal and  integrative  environmental  factors.   Various combinations  of climate, mineral
availability (soils and geology), vegetation, physiography, and land use dictate various associated
biological community structures.  Although these factors interact, their relative importance in
determining the character of ecosystems varies  from one place to another.  We believe that
distinct regional patterns of ecosystems can be distinguished through analysis of a combination
of small-scale maps depicting the important factors.

     Neither the concept of ecological regions nor the attempt to delineate them is new. The
development of regional classifications that incorporate spatial patterns from several ecological
factors has been an evolutionary process." One of the earliest efforts, by Herbertson (1905), was
on a global scale.  Herbertson considered the distribution of a combination of characteristics in
defining his "major natural regions" (an unpopular approach at the time) and also recognized the
need to consider distribution of human development (land use).

     There are two notable examples of regional classification schemes that have been developed
for the United States:  1) Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United
States (Austin 1965; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1981), developed
to help make decisions about national and regional agricultural concerns, and 2) Ecoregions of
the United States (Bailey 1976), developed for use by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
   *The term ecoregions was coined by J.M. Crowley (1967) and popularized by Robert G.
    Bailey (1976) to define a mapped classification of ecosystem regions of the United States.
    Unlike many coined words or words used to express special new meanings, such as
    "landscape" or "stream order," there is little disagreement, misunderstanding, or difference
    of opinion about the meaning of "ecoregion." Ecoregions are generally considered to be
    regions of relative homogeneity in ecological systems or in relationships between
    organisms and their environments.

                                            1

-------
Service. The former is a hierarchical classification based primarily upon soil survey information;
the latter is a hierarchical classification which relies upon a different environmental parameter
to delineate units at each level of resolution (e.g., Ecoregion Divisions  are based on a climate
map [Trewartha 1943], Ecoregion Sections, two steps finer in resolution, are based on units, or
groups of units, from Kuchler's map of potential natural vegetation [Kuchler 1970]).

     Our  approach to defining ecoregions grew out of an  effort to  use  existing spatial
frameworks to classify streams  for more effective water quality management  (Hughes and
Omernik  1981; Omernik, Shirazi, and Hughes 1982).  Because these frameworks were  not
developed to sort environmental characteristics relating to aquatic ecosystems,  they did  not
correspond to observed regional patterns in water quality. Least helpful were classifications
based on a single mapped environmental feature, and/or based on features not well related to
causal characteristics  that affect regional patterns in ecosystem quality [such as Hydrologic
Units (U.S. Geological Survey 1982)]. Additionally, none of the available classifications afforded
a means to evaluate the "typicalness" of entire watersheds.  Such an evaluation is necessary to
assess utility of existing data, design sampling schemes to address regional representativeness,
and determine regional patterns of attainable ecosystem quality.

     Recognizing that different  parameters (or sets of parameters) will have  a predominating
effect on water quality in different areas, we developed a more satisfactory scheme for defining
aquatic  ecoregions,  based on synoptic  assessment of patterns of terrestrial  and climatic
characteristics. The resulting regions are not exclusive to aquatic ecosystems but, because they
have  been developed using  mapped terrestrial features, are  useful for assessing  terrestrial
ecosystems as well.
ECOREGION DELINEATION

     To define ecoregions of the Upper Midwest States , we examined factors that either cause
regional variations in ecosystems, or integrate causal factors.  In general, many of the factors
are interrelated; patterns depicted by a map of one factor also appeared in other maps. These
congruent patterns help in the definition of ecoregions by reinforcing the relative homogeneity
of particular areas.  The following combination of maps was found to be most useful: Land Use
(Anderson 1970); Potential Natural Vegetation (Kuchler 1970); Land-Surface Form (Hammond
1970); and Soils (Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Lands and Soil 1973; U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Soil Surveys of the States of the North Central Region 1957). We
refer to these as the "component maps."  Other important environmental parameters such as
climate and length of growing season have already been integrated into the patterns depicted on
the component maps.

     The land use map is a strong integrative  tool for revealing ecosystem patterns in most of
the United States, reflecting spatial patterns in potentials and capacities of the land.  Potential
natural vegetation (PNV) is  also integrative because it synthesizes a variety of natural and
imposed land features. Hammond combined regional patterns of slope and local relief to produce
a map of relatively homogeneous classes of land-surface form. The classification scheme of the
soils taxonomy map (US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1970) was most
appropriate for our purposes but, because of its inaccuracies (resulting from a poor data base
and inappropriate cartographic techniques [Gersmehl 1977]), we relied on larger-scale soil maps
(as referenced above).
   ^
    We define "Upper Midwest" as including the States of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan,
    Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

-------
     Other maps were consulted to verify the regional accuracy of component maps and to
reinforce patterns indicating ecoregions. Most helpful were Surficial Geology (Hunt 1979),
Physical Divisions (Fenneman 1946), and Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas
of the United States (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1981). Maps in
Climates of the United States (Baldwin 1973) and the Census of Agriculture, Graphic Summary
(U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census 1973,1978,1982, and 1985) also were useful.

     The four most important component  maps were analyzed  together to sketch regions
exhibiting spatial homogeneity with regard to soils, land use, land-surface form, and potential
natural vegetation.  Identifying classes of each characteristic were tabulated, as shown on the
reverse  side  of  the enclosed ecoregion map.   We attempted  to delineate ecoregions at  a
functional  level of  resolution for regional and State resource management. For instance, an
ecoregion should not include highly contrasting areas containing topographic watersheds of
greater than  200 square  miles .  However,  some ecoregions exhibit a mosaic of conditions
common throughout the region that essentially constitutes an overall homogeneous pattern. In
the "most typical" portions of the North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion, for example, most
200 square-mile watersheds contain cropland, woodland, and wetland. Some watersheds contain
many lakes; in others, there are few or no lakes.  Thus, the ecoregion is typified by a degree of
contrast uncharacteristic  of other adjacent ecoregions.

     Subsequent steps for determining ecoregions included delineating ecoregion boundaries and
defining the  most  typical  portions of each ecoregion.   The most  typical portions of each
ecoregion are those areas sharing  all of the characteristics that typify that ecoregion.  The
remainder, or generally typical portions of each ecoregion, share most, but not all of these same
characteristics.

     The final step  was to color-code each ecoregion to convey a sense of the broader, multi-
regional patterns.   Regions predominantly of cropland were assigned shades from yellow to
brown and those characterized by  forests were assigned shades of green or blue.  Within each
ecoregion, darker color tones denote the most typical areas, while lighter tones represent the
generally typical areas.
ECOREGION DESCRIPTIONS

     Descriptions  of the  Upper Midwest  ecoregions  summarize  the  significant  natural
characteristics and land use conditions affecting aquatic ecosystems.  Discussions of ecoregions
are limited to those having "most typical" portions within the boundaries of the Upper Midwest
map (i.e., the Central Irregular Plains and Mississippi Alluvial Plain Ecoregions are excluded).
Each ecoregion synopsis includes a description of regional landscape features, stream and
watershed drainage characteristics^, major vegetation types, major soil taxa, and predominant
land uses.  Significant disturbances contributing to stream quality degradation  are also listed.
   •'Most references used in this research presented information in English units of measure.
    We have presented our  measurements'accordingly for ease of checking information.

   ^Because of the interest in applying this regional approach toward aquatic resource
    management, we have included information about "within-region" watershed size and
    stream density. Knowledge of within-region watershed size is important for determining
    the largest stream sizes of regionally representative (reference) stream sites. Estimates of
    stream density can provide a picture of the spatial distribution of the resource being managed.

-------
     Ecoregion photographs generally show most typical characteristics rather than extremes or
anomalous examples.  The high oblique views are taken from approximately 5,000 feet above
mean terrain.  Low oblique aerial photos (taken about 2,000 feet above the streams) have been
paired with ground photos of the same, relatively undisturbed  streams.

     The ecoregion descriptions include information from a variety of sources (Anderson 1970;
Braun 1974; Hammond 1970; Kuchler 1964, 1970; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
1974; Society of American Foresters 1980; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 1970,
1977; US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1970,1975,1981; US Department
of Agriculture, Soil Surveys of the States of the North Central Region 1957; U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Census 1982, 1985; U.S. Geological Survey 1970;  Weeks 1970).  Stream
density was determined from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic maps.
Northern Glaciated Plains (map unit #46^)

     The irregular, glacially formed topography, low to moderate annual precipitation, and
relatively short growing (frost-free) season of the Northern Glaciated Plains Ecoregion promote
a land use emphasis on dry-farming and livestock production (Photos 1-3). Approximately 7600
square miles,  or a little more  than  10 percent, of this ecoregion occurs within  the Upper
Midwest States.   Here glacial  lake plains and nearly level to rolling  glacial till plains are
punctuated by kettle holes, kames, and moraines. Elevations range from 1,000 to 1,800 feet
         Photo 1. The Northern Glaciated Plains Ecoregion is a natural grassland. Dryland farming and livestock
         production are the principal land uses.
   ^Numbers correspond to numerical labels used on the Upper Midwest and national ecoregion
   (Omernik 1987) maps.

-------
Photo 2
Photos 2 and 3. Most of the streams in the Northern  Glaciated Plains Ecoregion are intermittent. Water
withdrawal is a management concern in streams with enough water for irrigation.
 Photo 3.

-------
above sea level.  Topographic relief varies from a few feet on the till plains to greater than 150
feet in steep-walled stream valleys. The terrain is higher in elevation and more irregular than
in the nearby Red River Valley Ecoregion. Average annual precipitation varies from 22 to 26
inches.  Although more than half of the annual precipitation occurs during the growing season,
it usually limits maximum crop production.

     Large watersheds in this ecoregion^ cover more than one thousand square miles; however,
most watersheds are 100 square miles or less.  Except for the large rivers, almost all of the
streams (85 to 90  percent) in this ecoregion are intermittent.  Drainage density  of perennial
streams is  very low, approximately one-tenth  mile per  square mile.  Numerous lakes  and
reservoirs  are  scattered  throughout the ecoregion, but  many of  the smaller lakes  are
intermittent. Marshes occur in depressions and poorly drained flat areas.

     Grasses such as big and little bluestem, green needlegrass, and porcupine grass predominate
over most of the  Minnesota and Iowa portion  of this  ecoregion.   Prairie dropseed  and
needle-and-thread grow on steep  slopes. Prairie cordgrass occurs on wet soils.

     Chief crops in the Northern Glaciated Plains are corn and soybeans. The rest  of the
ecoregion is dry-farmed oats and other feed grains for livestock.  The intensity of farming is
somewhat less than in the adjacent Red River Valley and Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregions.
Swine  are  the predominant livestock in the  "Upper Midwest portion" of the ecoregion (beef
cattle predominate throughout the rest of the Northern Glaciated Plains).  Beef cattle, dairy
cattle,  and sheep are also raised.

     The soils of the Northern Glaciated Plains have been derived from parent materials similar
to the soils of adjacent ecoregions. Some soils have formed from glacial lacustrine deposits and
calcareous loam till, similar to the Red River Valley; however, the glaciated plains soils are drier
and typically contain a horizon of carbonate accumulation. Other soils resemble those of the
Western Corn Belt Plains and are derived from glacial till discontinuously mantled  by loess.
Haploborolls are dominant on well drained sites.  Calciborolls are found primarily on calcareous
loam till. Natriborolls and Psamments occur on some fluvial and aeolian materials.  Calciaquolls
and Haplaquolls in depressions are often drained  for crop production.

     Livestock production and dryland farming are the land use practices most affecting stream
water quality in the Northern Glaciated  Plains.  Trampling of stream banks and stream beds is
particularly severe in this region because livestock tend to travel in dry water courses.  Washing
of manure from feed lots and stock yards into streams has a dramatic effect on stream water
chemistry. Rainstorms in this ecoregion tend to be of short duration and high intensity; severe
erosion of cropland soils during runoff increases  water turbidity and sedimentation in many
streams.  Fertilizers and herbicides, applied over extensive acreage, are carried to streams
during  runoff.  In flat areas,  many stream courses have been plowed for cultivation.
Western Corn Belt Plains (map unit #47)

     About eighty percent, or 68,000 square miles, of the Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion
occurs in the Upper Midwest States.  The regional landscape includes extensive cropland on
nearly level to gently rolling dissected glacial till plains (Photos 4-6), hilly loess plains, and
   "Information concerning large watersheds refers to the largest topographic watersheds
    which originate, and are completely contained, within the ecoregion.

-------
morainal hills with broad, smooth ridgetops.  Streams generally have narrow, shallow valleys, and
local relief is typically less than 100 feet, approaching 250 feet along stream valleys in the hilly
portions of the ecoregion.  Elevation ranges from less than 600 feet along the Mississippi River
to about 1,700 feet in the northwest portion of the ecoregion, but most of the central portion
of the ecoregion is between 900 and 1,200 feet above sea level.  Average annual precipitation
ranges from 25 to 35 inches across the ecoregion and occurs mainly during the growing season.

     Larger watersheds cover as much as 4,000 square  miles. The Des Moines River, draining
more than 12,000 square miles, is a striking exception.  Perennial and intermittent streams are
equally  characteristic of the ecoregion.  Density of perennial streams is low,  from virtually no
streams to about three-fourths of a mile per square mile. Some streams are channelized for soil
drainage and to improve field shape for crop production; however,  the proportion of streams
that are channelized is much lower than in the adjacent Central Corn Belt  Plains Ecoregion.
Lakes and reservoirs are scattered over portions  of the region and  groundwater is available
under much of the area.

     The  most distinctive feature of the Western  Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion is the extensive
acreage in corn, soybeans, feed grains, and forage for livestock. Approximately three-fourths of
the ecoregion is cropland, with most of the remainder serving as pasture vegetated with native
and introduced grasses and legumes. The irregular topography of the Western Corn Belt Plains
promotes a stronger emphasis on livestock production than in the neighboring Central Corn Belt
Plains.  Swine are the major  livestock  raised, but beef cattle, poultry, and sheep  are also
economically important. Deciduous woodland exists on some wet bottomlands and on steep slopes
bordering stream valleys.
         Photo 4. Livestock production of hogs, pigs, and beef cattle, and cultivation of corn, soybeans, feed grain and
         hay are major land use practices in the Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion.

-------
Photo 5
    Photos 5 and 6. Many streams are denuded of riparian
    vegetation  and/or  channelized  to  increase  area
    available for cultivation. This portion of Elm Creek
    provides  an  example  of a less-impacted stream,
    though the sediment bars are typical of  streams in
    areas of upland erosion.
                                                Photo 6

-------
     The dominant vegetation in the Western Corn Belt Plains is tall-grass prairie.  In areas of
sandy, droughty soils, native grasses include little bluestem, indiangrass, needlegrass, porcupine
grass, and sand lovegrass.  Big bluestem grows on well drained soils.  Shallow soils support
sideoats grama, blue grama, and  little bluestem.  Prairie forbs include roundhead lespedeza,
spiderwort, and flowering spurge.  Clover, phlox, sunflower, bayfeather, and goldenrod occur on
the better developed soils.

     Soils in the Western Corn Belt Plains are generally deep and fertile, formed from loess and
glacial  till  under grasses.  Upland  soils are  Hapludolls,  Argiudolls,  and Udorthents, with
Haplaquolls in depressions and Hapludalfs on  wooded slopes. Soils of stream terraces include
Hapludolls and Haplaquolls. Haplaquolls, Udifluvents, and Fluvaquents are derived from alluvium
on bottomlands.

     Stream water quality is altered by crop and livestock production practices.  In areas  of low
topographic relief, many streams are plowed  to increase crop acreage.  A major concern in
steeper areas, especially in loess soils, is erosion. Fertilizers, herbicides, and insecticides, used
extensively for crop production in this region, are  washed and leached during runoff, altering
stream chemistry.  This process may  be accelerated in areas with artificial drainage.  Stream
quality  is greatly affected by manure  dispersal in areas where livestock congregate. Livestock
grazing in and near streams trample and denude riparian vegetation, thereby, reducing stream
bank and stream bed stability.
Red River Valley (map unit #48)

     The 16,500 square-mile Red  River Valley Ecoregion occupies the nearly level basin of
ancient Glacial Lake Agassiz  (Photos 7-9). More than half of this ecoregion lies in the Upper
         Photo 7. The Red River Valley Ecoregion occupies the nearly flat basin of former Glacial Lake Agassiz.
         Though the ecoregion includes very little standing water, a high water table has a significant influence on soil
         and vegetation.

-------
Photo 8
Photos 8 and 9.  Most streams in the Red River Valley Ecoregion are intermittent. An exception is Antelope
Creek, draining approximately 280 square miles at this photo point. Its meandering course reflects the flatness
of the terrain.
Photo 9.
                                               10

-------
Midwest States, generally at an elevation of about 800 to 1,100 feet.  Local relief is minimal
except around the margins of the ecoregion, where relief varies from 50 to 100 feet.  Unlike the
adjoining Northern Minnesota Wetlands Ecoregion, the Red River Valley has very little standing
water. Lakes in this ecoregion occur mainly where glacial till  and glacial moraine mark the
transition to adjacent ecoregions.  Most streams originating from within the  ecoregion are
intermittent and drain watersheds ranging up to a few hundred square miles. Perennial streams
in the valley typically originate in adjacent ecoregions. Stream  density averages less than one
mile per square mile. Average annual precipitation is from 20 to 22 inches, approximately half
of which occurs during the growing season.

     Land use and vegetation in the Red River Valley resemble that of the  nearby Northern
Great Plains Ecoregion; however, the valley soils are distinctive because of the presence of a
seasonally or permanently high water table (see mottling in Photos 7 and 8).  Soils  of the Red
River Valley formed from lacustrine sediments and sandy, gravelly beach deposits.  In some
areas, the soils are calcareous.  Soils have poor to imperfect drainage in areas of silt loam and
clay, and poor to excessive drainage in areas of sandy loam or loamy sand.  Principal soils on
level sites are Calciaquolls and Haplaquolls. Haploborolls and Udipsamments occur on beach
ridges and out wash plains.

      Natural vegetation in the Red River Valley is primarily tall-grass prairie, dominated by big
and little bluestem, switchgrass, and indiangrass. Bur oak, American basswood, American elm,
eastern cottonwood, green ash, and willow!; grow in some riparian areas.

     The ecoregion is dry-farmed for spring wheat, barley,  sunflower seeds, sugar beets,
potatoes, corn, rye, red clover, soybeans, and flax. Though most of the ecoregion is cropland,
some farmers also raise beef and dairy cattle, and swine. Poultry farms are concentrated  in
some areas.

     The main land use impacts on stream water quality in this region are related to dry-
farming practices. Because of the flat topography of the region, many smaller headwater stream
courses have been denuded and plowed for cropland. Runoff delivery of fertilizers, insecticides,
and other farm chemicals, employed extensively in this ecoregion, alters water chemistry in many
streams.  This process is generally accelerated where drainage tiles assist in  areas of naturally
poor soil drainage.


Northern Minnesota Wetlands (map  unit #49)

      Much of the Northern Minnesota Wetlands Ecoregion is a vast and nearly level, sparsely
(human) populated marsh.  Formerly occupied  by broad glacial lakes, most of the flat terrain is
still  covered by standing water (Photos 10-12).  Elevation for most of this 7,700 square-mile
ecoregion is around 1,200  feet, and  average annual precipitation  ranges from 20 to 25 inches
across the ecoregion.  There are few lakes; the three  largest are Upper and  Lower Red Lake
and  Lake of the Woods. An area directly south of Lower Red Lake contains many small lakes;
however, the area is transitional between the Northern Minnesota Wetlands and Northern Lakes
and  Forests Ecoregions.

      Watersheds are difficult to define in  this  region because of the flat terrain and numerous
drainage ditches that have been constructed. Most watersheds within the ecoregion occupy less
than 200 square miles, though a few are as large as 500 to 700 square  miles.  Natural streams
account for approximately one-fourth of  the total drainages in the ecoregion; their density is
generally less than 0.3 miles per square mile. Streams  are typically stained yellow-brown  from

                                           11

-------
           Photo 10. The Northern Minnesota Wetlands Ecoregion is characterized by swamp and marshland. Ditches
           along roadsides augment the otherwise naturally poor drainage.
dissolved organic material.

     Soils  of the  Northern  Minnesota  Wetlands  are affected  mainly  by poor drainage.
Ochraqualfs formed in poorly drained lacustrine materials and Eutroboralfs formed in better
drained areas.   Organic soils such as Sphagnofibrists and Borosaprists formed from organic
residues  in depressional areas.

     Most of the ecoregion is covered by swamp and boreal forest vegetation. Dominant tree
species are tamarack, black spruce, northern white-cedar, and black ash. Other prominent forest
components are balsam fir, red maple, mountain maple, glossy buckthorn, several shrub and
herbaceous species, and sphagnum mosses.

     The forested portions of the ecoregion are used primarily for lumber and recreation. Land
is  severely limited for agricultural use because of the locally poor soil  drainage and short
growing season. Wild rice, however, is grown in some wet soils, and feed grains and forage are
cultivated locally for beef and dairy cattle.

     Land use effects on stream quality are mainly from channelization of streams to improve
soil drainage.  Channelization alters the  physical habitat for stream biota and affects biotic
community structure.
                                            12

-------
 Photo 11.
Photos 11 and 12. Stream water in the Northern Minnesota Wetlands Ecoregion is typically transparent, but
coffee colored from dissolved organic material. Land use in this ecoregion is limited by poor soil drainage and
adverse climate.
Photo 12.
                                                  13

-------
Northern Lakes and Forests (map unit #50)

     Forests of conifers and northern hardwoods blanket the undulating till plains, morainal
hills, broad lacustrine basins, and extensive sandy outwash plains of the 69,700 square-mile
Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion (Photos 13-15). Rock outcrops are common in some areas.
Elevations across the ecoregion range from 600 feet, along the shorelines of the Great Lakes, to
greater than 2,000 feet,  on hills of the Superior National Forest in northeastern Minnesota.
Most of the ecoregion is between 1,200 and  1,600 feet above sea level. Local relief is minimal
on the plains,  about 200 to 500 feet in most of the hills, and 600 to 1,200 feet in the hills and
cliffs bordering the western part of Lake Superior. Numerous lakes dot the landscape. Average
annual  precipitation  ranges  from 26 to  36 inches across the  ecoregion.   Snowfall  in  this
ecoregion is considerably greater than in the rest  of the Upper Midwest (where average annual
snowfall ranges from  12 to 50 inches) and averages 50 to 80 inches over most of the ecoregion,
exceeding 100 inches along the southern shores of Lake Superior.

     Most streams in  the ecoregion are perennial, commonly originating in  lakes or wetlands.
Stream  density, however,  is  relatively low, generally less than one mile per square mile.
Although relatively free of sediment, surface waters have a characteristic brownish cast  because
of high concentrations of dissolved organic material.  Many streams originating within this
ecoregion drain  watersheds of more than 1,000 square miles; a few  drain watersheds on the
order of 4,000 square miles.  Extensive wetlands cover flat and/or low-lying areas.
         Photo 13. The Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion has numerous lakes and extensive wetlands.
                                           14

-------
      Photo 14.
         Photos  14 and  15.  The  natural vegetation  in  the
         Northern  Lakes and Forests Ecoregion  consists of
         mixed northern hardwoods and pine. Stream water is
         usually stained brown by dissolved organic material.
                                                      Photo 15.
15

-------
     Soils in the Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion formed primarily from sandy and loamy
glacial drift materials; the variety of parent materials is evident in the complexity of the soil
pattern. Haplorthods and Dystrochrepts dominate on uplands and outwash plains. Udipsamments
occur on sandy outwash plains. Glossoboralfs, Glossaqualfs, and Ochraqualfs can be found on
loess-mantled drift on outwash and till plains. Haplaquepts and Ochraqualfs occur on low till
plains and lake plains.  Borosaprists and other organic soils are common in  depressions.

     Like the North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion, the Northern Lakes and Forests region
supports mixed northern hardwoods forest vegetation, but additionally includes some extensive
stands of coniferous forest.  Sandy soils support forests of white pine, red pine, jack pine,
bigtooth aspen, and bur oak. Sugar maple, mountain maple, balsam fir, yellow birch, hemlock,
and  American beech grow on more moist sites.  Swampy lowlands support tamarack, black
spruce, black  ash, and northern  white cedar; sphagnum bogs occur in the wettest sites.

     Similar in many respects to  the North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion, the Northern
Lakes and Forests Ecoregion is markedly different in agricultural potential. Farming is all but
precluded by a combination of interrelated factors, including relatively nutrient-poor soils and a
short growing season. Most of this ecoregion remains as ungrazed forest and woodland, some of
which is used for timber production and recreation.  In the few cultivated areas, crops mainly
provide forage and feed grains for dairy and beef cattle and other livestock. A small acreage is
in permanent pasture.  Though  mining is not widespread in this ecoregion, the belt of  hills
comprising the Mesabi Range in Minnesota has been heavily strip-mined for iron.

     Historic logging, followed by extensive fires, have greatly altered forest vegetation and
stream quality in the  Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion. Cut-over pine/spruce forests have
been replaced by  aspen and birch. Layers of charcoal in lake sediments and an entirely altered
litter chemistry in streams are evidence of the effects on water quality from these early  land
use practices.  Effects on stream water quality from present land use practices are  minimal.
North Central Hardwood Forests (map unit #51)

     The North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion is transitional between the predominantly
forested Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion and the.agricultural ecoregions to the south
(Photos 16-18). This 36,000 square-mile ecoregion consists of nearly level to rolling glacial till
plains, lacustrine basins, outwash plains, and rolling to hilly moraines and beach ridges. Clusters
of lakes dominate the landscape in  many parts of the  region, particularly the western half.
Local topographic relief is minimal  in the plains, and generally 100 to 200 feet in morainal
areas.  Elevation ranges from approximately 600 feet above sea level, along the Lake Michigan
shoreline, to over 2,000 feet in  the extreme  western portion of the ecoregion.  The region
averages 24 to 32 inches of annual precipitation, occurring primarily during the growing season.

     Stream density and stream flow are highly variable throughout the ecoregion.  Density
ranges from virtually no streams, as in kettle/wetland terrain, to  more than two miles  of
perennial streams per square mile. Stream flow, while entirely intermittent in some portions  of
the ecoregion, is entirely perennial in others.  Streams with watersheds contained completely
within the ecoregion generally drain less than 600 square miles. Two larger exceptions are the
Long Prairie River and the North Fork of the Crow River in Minnesota, each draining more than
1,500 square miles.

     This ecoregion has mixed land  use potential.  Almost one-third of the land is cultivated
primarily to feed dairy cattle.  Poultry farms are concentrated in some areas. Truck crops and

                                           16

-------
        Photo 16. The varied terrain of the North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion supports forest and woodland,
        cropland, dairy farming and poultry production. Numerous lakes and wetlands provide habitat for wildlife and
        recreation.
cash crops are also important.  Potatoes, snap beans, peas, corn, and other canning crops are
commonly grown  under irrigation, and  cranberries are  grown in some of the wetter areas.
Fruits (especially cherries) and specialty crops are important on the Door Peninsula in Wisconsin.
Ten to 15 percent of the farmland is in permanent pasture. Wet bottomlands, steep slopes of
stream valleys and moraines, and extensive sandy areas remain  forested and are used for
woodlots and pulp and timber production.

     The North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion is named for its dominant forest species,
although the region is a mosaic with patches of many vegetation types that are more common in
some surrounding ecoregions. Some areas of wet soils have tamarack, white cedar, and other
conifers, similar to those found in the adjacent Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion.  Prairie
openings resemble those of the Driftless Area; both regions contain species also found in the
Western  Corn  Belt Plains.    The  overstory  in the  hardwood lowlands resembles  the
maple/basswood forests in the Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains and Driftless Area Ecoregions,
typically including some combination of sugar maple, yellow birch, American beech, American
basswood, oak, white ash,  and  hemlock.

     Soils have been derived from glacial materials of many different  particle sizes.  A few
areas are covered by  sandy outwash  or capped by silty  loess.   Peat bogs are sometimes
numerous. Hapludalfs are the  dominant soils on well drained uplands, though Eutroboralfs,
Hapludolls, and Haplorthods are locally common.  Glossoboralfs, Glossaqualfs, Ochraqualfs,
Haplaquolls, and Haplaquods occur where drainage is somewhat poorer. Wet organic soils, such
as Borofibrists, Sphagnofibrists, Borosaprists, Borohemists, and Humaquepts formed from plant
residues in wet areas and depressions.   Fluvaquents and Udifluvents occur on floodplains of
rivers and streams.  Udipsamments and Psammaquents are common on  sandy outwash plains.

                                           17

-------
                                                           Photo 17.
  Photos 17 and  18. Density of streams  draining the
  North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion is widely
  variable.  Some  areas support only perennial streams
  while other areas support only intermittent streams.
Photo 18.
                                                           18

-------
     Land use practices affecting stream water quality in the North Central Hardwood Forests
center around dairy farming.  Cattle affect stream bank stability by trampling and destroying
riparian vegetation. Manure from livestock or poultry alters stream water chemistry.  Water
quality is also affected by erosion of topsoil and runoff of farm chemicals from cropland.
Driftless Area (map unit #52)

     The hilly uplands of the Driftless Area Ecoregion easily distinguish it from the surrounding
ecoregions.  Much of the area consists of a loess-capped plateau, deeply dissected by streams
(Photos 19-21).  Some lower areas are covered by glacial outwash or lake and stream sediments.
Unlike adjacent ecoregions, the "Driftless" Area escaped the most recent glacial advance, and, in
fact, much of the region was apparently free of ice during the Pleistocene Epoch.

     Elevations  across the  13,500 square-mile ecoregion vary from about 600 to  1,400 feet.
Local relief is generally between 200 and 500 feet. Occurring mainly during the growing season,
average annual precipitation ranges from 30 to 33  inches throughout the ecoregion.

     Large streams in the  Driftless Area drain 300 to 400 square miles; a few streams have
watersheds in excess of 700 square miles. Intermittent streams account for somewhat more than
half of the total stream miles in this  ecoregion. Density of perennial streams  is around one-
half mile per square mile.  Wetlands  border  some of the streams, especially in  headwater
stretches and where natural or constructed dams have altered water levels.

     Livestock and dairy farming are  major land uses.  Level and gently sloping areas are used
         Photos 19. Dairy farming is the principal land use in the hilly Driftless Area Ecoregion. The less sloping terrain
         is cultivated for feed grains and forage for cattle.
                                           19

-------
 Photo 20.
 Photos 20 and 21. Streams in the larger watersheds of the Driftless Area Ecoregion are perennial. High flow is
 usually accompanied by suspended sediments from erosive loessal soils.
Photo 21.
                                             20

-------
as cropland, primarily for corn and feed grains.  Permanent pasture and forests cover most of
the steeper slopes, and woodlots are sufficiently extensive to allow some production of lumber
and firewood.

     The vegetation of the Driftless Area is transitional between the mixed forests of North
Central Wisconsin and the oak savannas of Iowa.  Upland hardwood forests consist primarily of
red oak, white oak, bitternut hickory, shellbark hickory, sugar maple, and/or wild cherry. Low
areas support forests dominated by elm, cottonwood, river birch, ash, silver maple, and willow.
Savanna communities of bur oak and bluestem grasses grow in some areas, particularly on sandy
soils; however, the grasslands have largely been converted for cropland or invaded by forests.

     The soils of the Driftless Area are derived mainly from variously thick layers of loess over
sedimentary bedrock.  The major soils on well drained uplands are Hapludalfs.  Argiudolls and
Hapludolls occur on some benches and broad ridgetops.  Quartzipsamrnents are derived from
sandstone on steep slopes.  Udipsamments, Udifluvents, and Haplaquolls are found on  stream
terraces and bottomlands.

     Agricultural activities have a major impact on stream quality in the Driftless Area.  Unless
carefully  managed, the loessal soils  are  extremely vulnerable to  sheet and rill erosion.
Sediments delivered to streams during runoff increase stream turbidity, Livestock affect stream
quality when they remove riparian vegetation and trample stream banks and stream beds.  Direct
deposit of animal wastes has altered the chemistry of many streams. Quarries and gravel pits
affect  the physical  habitat quality of nearby streams.
Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains (map unit #53)

     The Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains Ecoregion is primarily oriented toward livestock and
dairy farming and secondarily oriented toward production of canning and truck crops (Photos 22-
24). Terrain features include outwash plains, lacustrine basins, and nearly level to rolling till
plains  locally mantled with silt.  The plains  are interrupted by drumlins  and morainal belts,
adding as much as 200 to 250  feet of topographic relief.  Elevation is about 600 feet along the
Lake Michigan shoreline and  over 1,000 to  1,200 feet on some of the hills.  Lakes and basin
bogs are  common  in many parts of this 12,000  square-mile  ecoregion.   Average  annual
precipitation is from 28 to 33 inches across the ecoregion. Most precipitation occurs during the
growing season.

     Large watersheds in this ecoregion typically cover 400 to 1,000 square miles. The Rock
River, draining 4,000 square miles, is exceptionally large. Approximately 25 to 30 percent of the
streams in this region are intermittent. Density of perennial streams averages around one-half
mile per square mile.  Many streams are channelized to facilitate the drainage of wetland areas.
Constructed  channels supply additional  drainage  for wet  sites.   Numerous perennial and
intermittent lakes occur in depressions throughout the ecoregion.

     The Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains have a noticeably larger percentage of cropland than
the nearby  North  Central  Hardwood Forests, Northern Lakes  and  Forests, and  Southern
Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregions. The Central  Corn Belt Plains is the only
neighboring ecoregion with an equally strong emphasis on cropland; however, the mosaic of crops
in the two  regions is entirely different.  Dairy and  livestock farming  predominate in the
Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains, and most of the cropland is dedicated to the cultivation of
forage and feed grains. Canning  and truck crops are also important.  Large areas of organic
soils are cultivated  for onions, mint, corn, potatoes, beans, peas, and other vegetables. Sandier
                                             21

-------
 soils  produce  fruits  such   as
 berries, strawberries,  and  some
 orchard crops.  The  remaining
 cropland is  in pasture and farm
 woodlots.

      The agricultural soils of the
 Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains
 formed  in  a  humid  temperate
 climate  under hardwood  forest
 vegetation.  They are lighter  in
 color and  more  acid  than the
 prairie  soils  of  the  adjoining
 Central    Corn   Belt    Plains
 Ecoregion.   Hapludalfs  are the
 dominant soils on the silt-covered
 till plains.  Argiudolls are found
 on  grassy   parts   of  the  same
 landscape.      Haplaquolls  and
 Argiaquolls   are   common   in
 depressions, while Udipsamments
 occur  on   some  sandy   sites.
 Udifluvents and  Hapludolls are
 found  in   silty  sediments  on
 floodplains.

      The Southeastern Wisconsin
 Till Plains supports  a  mosaic of
 vegetation types,  representing a
 transition between the hardwood
 forests  of  the North  Central
 Hardwood Forests Ecoregion, the
 oak  savannas   of  the  Driftless
 Area, and the tall-grass prairies of
 the  Central  Corn  Belt  Plains.
 Upland  soils support  stands  of
 oak, sugar maple, and hickory, as
 well    as     natural     prairie
 characterized by big and little bluestem. Oak and hickory trees are scattered throughout many
 of the prairies. Uplands  in the northern  portion of the ecoregion support forests of mixed
 hardwood and pine species including sugar maple, oak, white ash, elm, yellow birch, white pine,
 red pine, and American beech. Lowland soils support sedge and grass meadows and mixed stands
 of hardwoods and conifers,  including elm, ash, cottonwood,  soft maple, and white cedar.

     Primary land use impact to stream quality is related to dairy farming. Livestock in and
 near streams reduce stream bank and stream bed stability.  Manure deposited in streams has a
 major impact on stream water chemistry. Runoff of agricultural fertilizers and insecticides also
alters stream chemistry in this  ecoregion.  In wet, marshy areas, channelization of  streams to
increase drainage causes loss of stream  habitat for biota.  The numerous  gravel pits in this
ecoregion affect habitat quality of nearby streams.
Photo 22. Dairy farming is the major land use in the Southeastern
Wisconsin Till Plains Ecoregion. Feed grains and hay dominate on upland
fields. Some organic soils are cultivated for onions, mint, corn, and truck
crops.
                                             22

-------
Photo 23.
 Photos 23 and 24. Cultivating wet soils and allowing livestock near streams can affect stream habitat quality in
 the Southeastern Wisconsin Till Plains Ecoregion.
 Photo 24.
                                                    23

-------
Central Corn Belt Plains (map unit #54)

     The Central Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion is strongly oriented toward production of feed
crops for livestock (Photos 25-27).  It has less topographic relief and more rainfall than the
adjacent Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion. For these reasons, almost all of the Central Corn
Belt Plains Ecoregion is in cropland, and there is less emphasis on raising of livestock. Much of
the ecoregion consists of a dissected glacial till plain mantled with loess.  The till plain has
mostly low relief, but the northern portion of the ecoregion includes some morainal hills with
local relief approaching 200 feet.  Stream valleys are generally shallow throughout  the 46,400
square-mile ecoregion.  Small streams have narrow valley floors;  larger streams have broad
valley floors. Elevation varies from about 400 feet,  in the southern portion of the ecoregion, to
over 1,000 feet on a few of the hills in the north.  Precipitation occurs mainly during the
growing season and averages from 32 to 44 inches annually.  Except near Lake Michigan, and in
the meander corridors along major rivers, few natural lakes occur in the ecoregion.  Several
reservoirs have been constructed for flood control,  water supply, low-flow augmentation, and
hydroelectric power generation.

     Large watersheds in the ecoregion generally cover  1,000 square  miles.   Exceptional
watersheds include those of the Embarras River (2,000 square miles) and the Sangamon River
(5,000  square miles). Other large rivers, such as the Rock and Illinois, originate in adjacent
ecoregions and flow  through the Central Corn Belt Plains.  Both perennial and intermittent
streams are common in this ecoregion. Constructed drainage ditches and channelized streams
further assist in soil drainage in  flat, poorly drained areas  (e.g., claypans). Stream density is
approximately one mile per square mile in the "most typical" portions of the ecoregion, but
ranges from one to two miles per square mile in the "generally typical" portions of the
ecoregion.
        Photo 25. Land use in the Central Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion is strongly oriented toward cultivation of corn,
        soybeans, feed grains, and hay. Drainage ditches and channelized streams aid soil drainage where claypans
                                              24

-------
                                                       Photo 26.
  Photos 26 and 27. Land  in the Central Corn Belt
  Plains Ecoregion is  commonly plowed  right up to
  streams banks to maximize cropland  acreage. This
  vegetated, unchannelized section of Rooks Creek is
  an example of a stream having relatively little impact.
Photo 27.
                                                                 25

-------
     Crops cultivated in the Central Corn Belt Plains are mainly corn, soybeans, feed grains,
and some forage for livestock. Hogs and pigs are of primary economic importance; beef cattle,
sheep, poultry, and some dairy cattle are also produced.  Emphasis on livestock production is not
as great as in the Eastern and Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregions. Approximately five percent
of the Central Corn Belt Plains remains as woodland, primarily on wet floodplains, steeply
sloping valley  sides, and morainal ridges. Numerous oil fields occur in the southeastern quarter
of the ecoregion, and several areas of the ecoregion (particularly in western Illinois) have been
strip-mined for  coal.

     Most of the soils of the Central Corn Belt Plains developed under tall-grass prairie. They
are darker and  more  fertile  than soils in  the formerly wooded Eastern  Corn Belt Plains.
Hapludolls and  Argiudolls are  the most common soils on loess-covered  till.   Argiaquolls,
Haplaquolls, and Ochraqualfs occur on broad, flat uplands, especially in  the claypan region of
south central Illinois. Fragiaqualfs and Hapludalfs are locally common on forested slopes and
loessal ridges/ Hapludolls, Haplaquolls, Udifluvents, and Fluvaquents are found on poorly drained
silty or clayey alluvium  on floodplains.  A few Haplaquolls and Medisaprists  have formed in
poorly drained flats and wet depressions.

     The Central  Corn  Belt  Plains historically supported a mosaic of  bluestem  prairie and
oak/hickory forest.  Most of the level uplands and broad floodplains  were  covered by tall
grasses: big and little bluestem, indiangrass, prairie dropseed, and switchgrass. Hardwood forest
originally occupied the irregular topography of stream valleys and moraines.  The woodlands
were mainly a mixture of oak and hickory species: black oak, white oak,  bur oak,  red oak,
shingle oak, shagbark hickory, and bitternut hickory, with an occasional black walnut, yellow
poplar, white ash, sugar maple, basswood, elm, and beech. Riparian areas at present support pin
oak, silver maple,  elm, ash, cottonwood, willow, sycamore, and sweetgum. Cattails, bulrushes,
and  common  reed grow in organic soils in marshes.

     Nonpoint source pollution in the Central Corn Belt Plains is derived  mainly from crop and
livestock production. Erosion of soils from cultivated slopes,  particularly a  problem in loessal
soils, increases  stream  turbidity and  sedimentation.   Likewise,  runoff  of the  fertilizers,
herbicides, and  insecticides  used extensively  in  this  region  alter water chemistry  in many
streams. Channelization of streams and construction of drainage ditches in cropland, particularly
where claypans  exist, reduce habitat for stream biota.  Decreased stream bank and stream bed
stability result from livestock trampling and grazing of riparian vegetation in and near streams.
Where livestock  congregate, manure dispersal can strongly affect stream water chemistry.  Strip
mining for coal  has long-term effects on stream water chemistry and habitat over many stream
miles.
Eastern Corn Belt Plains (map unit #55)

     The  Eastern Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion is a  region of extensive cropland agriculture
(Photos 28-30). It is distinguished from similar corn belt regions to the west primarily by its
natural forest cover and associated soils.   The gently rolling glacial till plain comprising the
Eastern Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion is broken by moraines, kames, and outwash plains. Elevations
throughout the ecoregion range from about 600 feet, near Lake Erie, to greater than 1,200 feet.
Local relief  is generally less than 50  feet; however, in some of the north central moraines,
relief reaches 200 feet, and along some streams in the southern portion of the ecoregion, there
are elevation differences of up to 400 feet.  Valleys are typically narrow and shallow.

     Larger watersheds in  the ecoregion cover thousands of  square miles.  For example, the

                                             26

-------
 White River (Indiana) drains some
2,500  square   miles; the  Great
Miami River (Ohio) drains 3,500
square  miles;  and  the Wabash
River (Indiana) drains 4,000 square
miles.  About  half the streams in
this 31,800 square-mile  ecoregion
are perennial, and many  have been
channelized to assist soil drainage.
Larger  streams  are regulated to
inhibit  flooding.     Density  of
perennial streams is approximately
one-half  mile per square mile.
The ecoregion has few  reservoirs
or natural lakes.  Of these, many
are in steeper river  valleys and
are long and  sinuous.   Average
annual precipitation ranges from
35  inches in   the  north,  to  40
inches in the south.  Much of the
precipitation  occurs  during  the
growing season and is  generally
adequate for crop production.

     The Eastern Corn Belt Plains
support a diverse hardwood forest;
American beech and sugar maple
predominate,  but  a significant
amount of white oak, black oak,
northern red oak, yellow poplar,
hickory,  white ash, and black
walnut is also  found. Many of the
same   tree  species   occur  in
adjacent ecoregions, but most of
those ecoregions are characterized
by a  predominance of oak and
hickory. On wetter sites  in  the
Eastern Corn  Belt  Plains,  the forest includes white oak, pin oak, northern red oak, yellow
poplar, ash, and sweetgum as major constituents; shingle oak, black oak, and hickory may also
occur. Silver maple, cottonwood, sycamore, pin oak, elm, and sweetgum grow along rivers and
streams.

     Soils of the Eastern Corn Belt Plains reflect the influence of deciduous forest vegetation.
The parent material is mainly a loamy calcareous glacial till, overlain by loess deposits in some
southern parts of the ecoregion.  Though derived from similar parent materials, these soils are
lighter in color and more acid  than those  of the adjacent Central Corn Belt Plains,  which
formed under tall grasses. Hapludalfs and Ochraqualfs are the dominant soil groups on drier and
wetter upland  sites, respectively. Argiaquolls, Haplaquolls, and Medisaprists have developed in
flats and depressions.  Hapludalfs and Fragiudalfs are common on well drained slopes of valleys.
Shallow Hapludolls occur on some valley sides where erosion has removed the glacial material
and exposed the underlying shaly limestone.  Udifluvents and Fluvaquents have derived from
Photo 28. Approximately three-fourths of the Eastern Corn Belt Plains
Ecoregion is in cropland, primarily for corn and soybeans.
                                             27

-------
Photo 29.
Photos 29  and 30.  Many streams in  the Eastern Corn  Belt Plains  Ecoregion have been channelized  or
regulated to inhibit  flooding. This portion of the Stillwater River provides an example of a less  impacted
stream.
 Photo 30.
                                                  28

-------
silty alluvium in relatively narrow floodplains.

     The ecoregion is almost entirely farmland.  Three-fourths of the area is in cropland; the
rest is permanent pasture, small woodlots, or urban.  Corn and soybeans are the principal crops;
other feed grains and hay for  livestock are also grown.  Truck and canning crops are locally
important, and some farms grow tobacco as a cash crop. Swine, beef and dairy cattle, chickens,
and turkeys are raised throughout the ecoregion.  Oil fields augment the economy in some areas.

     Stream quality in the Eastern Corn Belt Plains is influenced by the agricultural economy.
Runoff of fertilizers, herbicides, and insecticides, used extensively for crop production in this
ecoregion, can alter stream chemistry.  Where natural soil drainage is poor, artificial drainage
systems accelerate the rate of delivery of these farm chemicals to streams.  Extensive stream
channelization reduces habitat  diversity for stream biota.  In livestock areas, manure  disposal
can pollute streams. Cattle in and near streams can contribute to stream bank and stream bed
erosion.  Seepage of sludge near drilling sites in oil fields may increase stream turbidity.  A
moderate  number of quarries and instream mining of gravel occur in this ecoregion and  may
impose local effects on stream habitats.
Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains (map unit #56)

     Land use in the Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregion is more varied
than in the adjacent Northern Lakes and Forests, Huron/Erie Lake Plain, Eastern Corn Belt
Plains, and Central Corn Belt Plains Ecoregions.  Land use in this transitional region (Photos
31-33) encompasses crop and livestock production, forests and woodland, a high degree of
        Photo 31. Land use is varied in the Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregion. Cropland is
        mainly in corn, other feed grains, and hay for dairy cattle. Pasture, forest, and woodland occupy sloping sites.
                                              29

-------
 Photo 32.
 Photos 32 and 33.  Streams  in the Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregion are typically

 sluggish and often bordered by swampy tracts.

'fk   '  "s   •
 '  '     '  -  '
Photo 33.
                                           30

-------
urbanization (particularly near the Great Lakes and along major rivers), and extensive quarrying.
The ecoregion includes a broad, nearly flat to rolling glaciated plain, deeply mantled by glacial
till and outwash, sandy and gravelly beach ridges and flats, belts of morainal hills (including
drumlins and kames), and boggy kettle depressions. The terrain is more irregular than in the
adjacent Huron/Erie Lake Plain,  Central Corn  Belt Plains,  and Eastern Corn Belt Plains
Ecoregions, but not as hilly as the  Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion. Local topographic
relief is only a few feet in the flatter portions of the Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till
Plains, and several hundred feet on the more irregular features.  Elevation ranges from about
600 feet along the shores of the Great Lakes, to over 1,000 feet on some moraines.  Average
annual precipitation is from 35 to 46 inches, generally increasing from north to south across the
ecoregion.  Most of the precipitation occurs during the freeze-free p>eriod.

     The 25,800 square-mile ecoregion is drained predominantly by perennial streams. Density of
perennial streams is approximately  one-half mile per square mile.  Only 10 to 15 percent of the
streams are intermittent. Streams are typically sluggish and are bordered, often extensively, by
swampy tracts. Drainage ditches and channelized streams commonly assist drainage of wetter
areas.  The larger streams  originating from within the ecoregion drain watersheds of 500 to
2,000 square miles. Lakes are common in some areas; however, many depressions are filled with
peat deposits or dark mineral soils.

     Land is managed for cropland, livestock, forest and woodland, and urban use. Cropland is
mainly in corn, other feed  grains, soybeans, and hay for livestock. Soft winter wheat and dry
edible beans are important  cash crops. Other cash and truck crops, especially on outwash areas
near the Great Lakes include berries, strawberries, apples, peaches, plums, grapes, Irish
potatoes, asparagus,  cucumbers, onions, cabbage, sweet corn, and red clover seed. Livestock
emphasis is on dairy cattle, but beef cattle, swine, sheep, and  poultry are also  important.
Approximately one-fourth  of the ecoregion is urbanized. Gravel quarries are common across the
entire region.

     Oak/hickory forests  are  the  natural  vegetation  throughout  most of  the  Southern
Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains. Major tree species include white oak, red oak, black oak,
bitternut hickory, shagbark hickory,  sugar maple, and beech. This vegetation is not common in
the mixed forest to the north or on the poorly drained lake plains to the south and east.  Red
maple, white  oak, American elm and basswood are common on somewhat wetter  soils in the
Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains. Wet sites support swamp forests of white ash,
red maple, quaking aspen, and black cherry.

     Soils of the  Southern  Michigan/Northern  Indiana Till Plains have been derived from a
variety of  parent materials under  the influence of forest  vegetation cover.  Hapludalfs and
Ochraqualfs developed in loamy glacial drift and till.  Soils derived from finer materials and
areas of poor drainage include Argiaquolls, Haplaquolls,  Haplaquepts, and Psammaquents.
Udipsamments formed on better drained outwash plains. Medisaprists and other organic soils can
be found in depressions throughout  the ecoregion.

     Farming  practices and urban needs impose the greatest land use impacts on water quality in
the Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Till Plains Ecoregion. Stream channelization reduces
habitat for biota.  Runoff carries fertilizers and other chemical compounds to streams, altering
water chemistry.  Where livestock  have access to streams, grazing and trampling along stream
banks and  stream beds reduces stability of  the physical  stream habitat.  Animal wastes alter
stream water chemistry. Urbanization occurs mainly along the shores of the Great Lakes and
the major rivers.  Water courses are physically and chemically altered through a variety of
municipal and industrial practices  (winter road-salting is  one  significant example).  Numerous

                                             31

-------
gravel pits in this ecoregion have local impacts on stream water quality where hillslope erosion
is accelerated or stream substrate is disturbed by quarrying activities.


Huron/Erie Lake Plain (map unit #57)

     The discontinuous Huron/Erie Lake Plain Ecoregion is distinguished from surrounding
ecoregions primarily by features related to poor soil drainage.  The ecoregion consists of a
broad, nearly level lake plain crossed by beach ridges and low moraines. Most of the area was
once covered by forested wetlands.  Many  wetlands still dot the landscape, but much of the
region  has  been  drained  and
cleared  for cropland (Photos 34-
36).  The elevation across most of                                    ''
the ecoregion is around 600 feet,
rising to 800 feet on some of the
moraines. Local relief is generally
only a few feet.

     More  than  half   of   the
streams   draining   the   11,000
square-mile Huron/Erie Lake Plain
are intermittent, though density of
perennial  streams  accounts  for
approximately one-half mile per
square  mile.    In  the northern
section of the ecoregion,  streams
draining    larger    watersheds
(contained completely within  the
ecoregion) drain 100 to 200 square
miles.  In the southern section of
the ecoregion, large streams drain
as much  as  400 to  500  square
miles.  However, the majority of
streams in the ecoregion drain less
than  100 square miles (because
larger streams generally originate
in  adjacent  ecoregions).     In
addition to the construction  of
numerous drainage ditches, many
streams    are     extensively
channelized for quicker drainage.
The  few lakes and  reservoirs  in
this  ecoregion (mainly in Ohio)
are small,  with  surface areas  of
less than one-fourth of a square
mile. Average annual precipitation
ranges from 31 to 35 inches across
the ecoregion.  Precipitation  is
fairly evenly distributed throughout the year and generally adequate for crop production.

     The  extensive,  nearly level plains and  numerous depressions in  morainal areas are
responsible for  the  formation  of poorly and  very poorly drained soils.  Ochraqualfs  and
Haplaquepts have formed in lacustrine and glacial drift. Udipsamments and Hapludalfs can be
Photo 34. Extensive plains and numerous depressions have led to the forma-
tion of poorly to very poorly drained soils in the Huron/Erie Lake Plain
Ecoregion.
                                             32

-------
 Photo 35.
Photos 35 and 36. A majority of the Huron/Erie Lake Plain Ecoregion is in cropland, most of which requires
artificial drainage. Portions of this stream have been channelized to improve field shape.
 Photo 36.
                                                  33

-------
found on beach ridges and other well drained sites.

     The poorly drained soils of the Huron/Erie Lake Plain support swamp forests.  Major
species are American elm, red maple, and black ash (replaced by white ash where soil drainage
is slightly better, as in northern Ohio).  Accompanying the major forest species in the northern
part of the ecoregion are balsam poplar, balsam fir,  yellow birch, and, less commonly, eastern
white pine, tamarack, black spruce, northern white cedar, white spruce, quaking aspen, slippery
elm, paper birch, and American basswood. In parts of northern Ohio, the forest also includes
silver maple, swamp white oak, sycamore, pin oak, blackgum, and eastern  cottonwood.

     Cash crop farming is the primary land use in the Huron/Erie Lake Plain.   Corn, winter
wheat, soybeans, and hay are the principal crops, but sugar beets, field and seed beans, and a
variety  of canning crops are  also important.   Fruit  and truck  crops  are grown  on some
coarse-textured soils.  Some farmland is  in pasture and small woodlots.  Principal  livestock
include swine, dairy cattle, and chickens.  Approximately one-tenth of the  area is urbanized.

     Land use impacts on stream water quality in the Huron/Erie Lake Plain are primarily from
crop and  livestock production and the  exploration and drilling activities  associated with
numerous oil fields.  Channelization of streams and construction of  ditches to improve soil
drainage reduce habitat for stream biota. Additionally, delivery of farm chemicals to streams is
expedited by  the  use  of  artificial  drainage.  Livestock can disrupt stretches  of stream by
trampling and  grazing in and near streams, and through deposition of animal  wastes (either
directly by instream livestock,  or indirectly by manure dispersal).
Erie/Ontario Lake Plain (map unit #61)

     The  nearly level to strongly rolling terrain of the Erie/Ontario Lake  Plain Ecoregion
exhibits a mosaic of cropland, pasture, livestock and poultry production, and woodland and forest
(Photos 37-39). The 8,000 square miles shown on the map of the Upper Midwest, and addressed
in this description, represent one-third of the total area of this ecoregion. The glacial plain is
interspersed with higher remnant beach ridges, drumlins, glacial till ridges, till plains, and
outwash terraces. Local relief is greater in the Erie/Ontario Lake Plain Ecoregion than in the
neighboring Huron/Erie Lake Plain and Eastern Corn Belt Plains Ecoregions, but less than in the
steep, rugged terrain of the Western Allegheny Plateau.  The elevation of the Erie/Ontario Lake
Plain ranges from about 600 feet near Lake Erie, to 1,200 feet on the uplands. Local relief of
the plain  is generally minimal, but glacial till ridges and outwash terraces may rise  100 feet
above  adjacent valley floors, and larger drumlins may have as much as 300 feet of elevation
change.

     The  majority of streams in the Ohio portion of the Erie/Ontario Lake Plain ecoregion are
perennial; however, there is great local variation in the concentration of streams.  Density of
perennial streams, for example, varies from one-half mile to two miles per square mile. Many
streams have been channelized to control adjacent marshy areas.

     Large watersheds in this ecoregion typically cover 500 square miles.  Two larger examples
are French Creek, draining more than 1,000 square miles, and Beaver River, draining more than
2,000 square miles.  Average annual precipitation ranges from  35 to 45 inches. Precipitation is
generally  adequate for good crop production, although some high value fruit and vegetable crops
receive supplemental irrigation. The ecoregion  includes many lakes and reservoirs.
                                             34

-------
        Photo 37. Dairy farming is the major enterprise in the Erie/Ontario Lake Plain Ecoregion. Cultivation of feed
        grains and forage is interspersed with pasture, woodland, and forest.
     Dairy cattle are raised throughout the Erie/Ontario  Lake Plain Ecoregion.  In  Ohio,
approximately one-tenth of the region provides pasture for cattle. Poultry farms are found in
some areas.  Cropland covers about one-third of the area and  is interspersed with pasture,
woodland, and forest.  Cropland emphasis is on feed grains and forage for dairy cattle.  Hay is
the principal crop; corn is common. Cash crops include canning and truck crops such as berries
and some orchard varieties.  Forests cover about one-fifth of the area and are used primarily as
woodlots, saw logs, and pulpwood. Approximately  20 percent of the ecoregion is urbanized.
There is  some oil  and gas drilling and  strip mining  for  coal  in the  southern arm of the
ecoregion.

     The Erie/Ontario Lake Plain supports a northern hardwoods forest.  Many of the tree
species also occur in the Western Allegheny Plateau Ecoregion,  but the simpler forest of the
Erie/Ontario Lake Plain more closely resembles the Eastern Corn Belt Plains forests.  On wetter
soils, vegetation of the Erie/Ontario Lake Plain is similar to the swamp forest of the Huron/Erie
Lake Plain. American beech, sugar maple, red oak, white ash, and white oak predominate over
much of the region in Ohio. Associated trees are American basswood, shagbark hickory, black
cherry, and cucumbertree. On wet sites in northern  Ohio, forest  constituents are silver maple,
swamp white oak, sycamore, pin oak, blackgum, and eastern cottonwood.

     Soil traits in the Erie/Ontario Lake Plain reflect the humid climate and forest cover.  Soils
tend  to be light-colored  and acid, and are mainly derived from glacial till and  lacustrine
sediments. Hapludalfs, Fragiudalfs, and Fragiudults formed on  uplands.  Ochraqualfs,
Haplaquepts, and Eutrochrepts developed in lacustrine sediments and in depressions in glacial till
plains.  Eutrochrepts,  Fluvaquents, and Haplaquepts developed  from alluvial deposits along
streams.
                                             35

-------
                     Photo 38.
                              Photos 38 and 39. Most streams in the Erie/Ontario
                              Lake  Plain Ecoregion are perennial.  Stream habitat
                              quality is most likely to be affected by in- and near-
                              stream dairy cattle, and runoff of farm chemicals.
                                              ft
                                              ••*•-
                                                                     Photo 39.
.   ,      -        .

               36

-------
     Dairy farming is responsible for the major land use impacts on stream quality in the
Erie/Ontario Lake Plain Ecoregion.  Pastured cattle with access to streams cause stream bank
erosion through trampling and grazing of riparian vegetation.  Where cattle or poultry are
concentrated near streams, manure  dispersal greatly  alters  stream water chemistry.   Some
cropland  areas require artificial  drainage,  which accelerates  the rate of delivery  of farm
chemicals to streams.  Streams are often channelized, regulated, and used for industrial purposes
in urbanized areas. Numerous gravel pits, quarries, and oil and gas drilling have local effects
on nearby streams.
Western Allegheny Plateau (map unit #70)
     The    Western   Allegheny
Plateau Ecoregion  is a dissected
plateau comprised of horizontally
bedded sandstone, siltstone, shale,
and limestone.  The 12,000 square
miles of the Ohio portion  of this
ecoregion,    discussed    here,
represent  somewhat more than
one-third of the total  extent  of
the  region.   This  portion  is
characterized  by  steeper,  more
rugged terrain than  neighboring
ecoregions to the north and west
(Photos 40-42).   Consequently,
most of the ecoregion remains in
forest.   Elevation  ranges from
about  600  feet along  the Ohio
River, to over 1,000 feet on some
of the higher ridges.  Local relief
is between 300 to 500 feet.

     Large  watersheds  in  this
ecoregion typically cover  200 to
400 square  miles.  Most streams
are perennial;  some, in  smaller
agricultural  valleys,  may   be
channelized. Density of streams is
generally  between one and two
miles per square mile.  The few
natural lakes  are small,  usually
less  than  half a  square  mile.
Reservoirs, though few, outnumber
natural lakes.  Most reservoirs are
smaller than five square miles.
Photo 40. Steep topography and erosive soils influence land use in the
Western Allegheny Plateau Ecoregion. Streams are most heavily impacted
from strip mining practices. Effects from mining are generally long-term.
     Steep topography and  high
erosion potential are  the  chief
land use limitations of the Western Allegheny Plateau. Most of the ecoregion is forested; timber
harvest is an important land use over much of the area.  A large portion of the ecoregion has
                                              37

-------
        Photo 41.
               Photos  41 and 42. Most of the Western Allegheny
               Plateau Ecoregion is forested. Cropland and pasture
               occur  where  local relief is minimal, primarily  on
               valley  floors.
                                                       Photo 42.
38

-------
been strip-mined for coal. Less than one-fifth of the ecoregion is in cropland, which generally
occurs on valley floors.  Alfalfa and hay for beef and dairy cattle are the main crops.  Fruit
and vegetable crops are farmed on a small, local scale.  Urban growth continually infringes on
farmland area.

     The  Western  Allegheny  Plateau   is  an  ecoregion of mixed  mesophytic  forest.
Characteristically,  canopy dominance is  shared by  more species than in the neighboring
ecoregions to the north and west. Major forest species are white oak, black oak, northern red
oak, scarlet oak, shagbark hickory, bitternut hickory, pignut hickory,  mockernut  hickory,
basswood, American beech, yellow poplar, blackgum, sugar maple, red maple, white ash, green
ash, American elm, red elm, cucumbertree, sweetgum, short leaf pine, pitch pine, Virginia pine,
loblolly pine, linden, black walnut, black cherry, and eastern hemlock. The composition of the
forest changes spatially with moisture  availability and soil fertility.  Oak/hickory communities,
accompanied by pines, occur on drier sites, such as ridge tops or  southwest-facing slopes.
Mixed forests of maples and other hardwoods  occur on sites with more moisture, such as  in
coves or on northeast-facing slopes.

     Soils of the Western Allegheny Plateau  are formed  predominantly from unglaciated
sedimentary rocks, with  a capping of loess in some areas.  Soils developed under forest cover
are light in color, acidic, and likely to have a hardpan layer. On steep slopes, there is enough
root throw activity to disrupt soil layering and inhibit soil profile development.  Such activity
explains the relatively large percentage of Inceptisols on the steeper terrain. Hapludalfs formed
in residuum from shales and siltstones. Hapludults are found in the more acid siltstones, shales,
and some sandstones.  Shallow, acid  Dystrochrepts  are common on steep  slopes and ridges.
Fragiudults, occur in colluvium or residuum on side slopes.  Eutrochrepts, Fluvaquents, and
Haplaquolls have developed on floodplains.

     Mining operations have a major impact on stream water quality in the Western Allegheny
Plateau. Erosion of sediments from  open pits, introduction of toxic compounds, and direct
physical disruption of stream beds have degraded stream habitat and water  quality in many
areas.  Sludge and seepage from numerous oil and gas fields add sediment and affect stream
water chemistry on nearby streams. Though crop and livestock agriculture account for only a
small percentage of land use in the Western Allegheny Plateau, their impact on water  quality is
significant because they occur predominantly in narrow stream valleys. Stream side vegetation
has often been removed to expand cropland or pasture, causing erosion along denuded stream
banks  and adjacent cropland.  This increases stream turbidity and sedimentation.


Interior Plateau (map unit #71)

     Characteristics  of the Interior Plateau Ecoregion  are transitional between the adjacent
Eastern Corn Belt Plains and Western Allegheny Plateau Ecoregions.   The Interior Plateau
includes a till plain of low topographic relief formed from Illinoian glacial drift materials, rolling
to moderately dissected basin  terrain, and rolling to  deeply dissected  plateaus (Photos 43-45).
Layers of sandstone, siltstone, shale, and limestone underlie  much  of  the  Interior Plateau.
Limestone outcrops are common, as are areas pitted with limestone sinks.

     Approximately 15 percent, or 8,400 square miles, of the entire ecoregion is represented on
the map of the Upper Midwest.  Elevations within this area vary from about 500 feet near
the Ohio River, to more than 1,000 feet on some of the higher hills.  Local relief is commonly
between 100 and 200  feet on the till plains and generally around 400 feet in  the more hilly
terrain, though relief may exceed 800 feet on some  of the steeper hills. Average annual
                                             39

-------
         Photo 43. The Interior Plateau Ecoregion is transitional between the flat to rolling cropland of the corn belt and
         the hilly, forested uplands to the east. Stream density is high, except in areas of numerous limestone sinks.
precipitation in the Interior Plateau ranges from 40 to 45 inches.  Precipitation is distributed
fairly evenly throughout the growing season and is usually adequate for crop  production.

    The majority of the streams in this ecoregion are perennial. Stream density over much of
the region is approximately two miles per square mile, except in areas containing numerous
limestone sinks, where surface streams are much less common.  Large watersheds cover 200 to
500 square miles.  Natural lakes are few, and  occur mainly in areas underlain  by limestone
(which may include many limestone sinks containing standing water).

     Land use  in the Interior Plateau represents a transition  between the Eastern Corn Belt
Plains and the Western Allegheny Plateau.  The Eastern Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion is well
suited for cropland and livestock production while the Western Allegheny Plateau is managed
mainly for timber and mining products. Acreage in the Interior Plateau is managed for cropland,
livestock, pasture, woodland, and forest; the land use varies with local topography. Principal
crops include hay, grains,  and pasture for livestock.   Corn, soybeans, wheat, and tobacco are
cultivated  to  a lesser degree.   Beef cattle  are the predominant livestock  throughout the
ecoregion, with dairy cattle and swine well represented. Poultry is raised intensively in some
locations. Numerous quarries and gravel pits occur throughout the ecoregion,  and some areas
are covered by gas and oil fields and coal strip mines.

     As with soils of the Western Allegheny Plateau, many of the soils in the Interior Plateau
formed in residuum from a variety of sedimentary rocks overlain by varying amounts of loess.
Some soils of the Interior Plateau, like those of  the Eastern Corn Belt Plains, are derived from
calcareous loam till with localized mantlings of loess.  Developed under predominantly forest
vegetation, soils are lighter in  color, more acid, and more likely to have  a hardpan layer.

                                              40

-------
      Photo 44.
          Photos 44 and 45. This Interior Plateau stream flows
          through  a forested  lowland,  but its sediment load
          reflects  the  intensity of  cultivation on the  sloping
          uplands.
                                                    Photo 45.
41

-------
Fragiudalfs, Hapludalfs, Fragiudults, and Hapludults formed on ridge tops, side slopes, and flat
areas of uplands. Dystrochrepts formed locally on upland ridge tops and side slopes. Hapludolls,
Haplaquolls, Eutrochrepts, Dystrochrepts, Fluvaquents, and Udifluvents developed in association
with floodplains. Fragiaquults evolved in some small basins and depressions, and Haplaquepts in
slack water areas.  Paleudults developed on old landscapes  with broad, smooth slopes.

    The vegetation of the Interior Plateau includes a variety of forest types which range from
hardwood forests, like those in the Eastern Corn Belt Plains, to mixed mesophytic forest, like
that of the Western Allegheny Plateau.  The  biotic complexity in the Interior Plateau can be
attributed to the variety in topographic and edaphic factors.  On drier slopes and uplands, forest
communities include combinations of oak species (such as white, black, red, scarlet, chinkapin,
post, bur, blackjack, and chestnut) and one or more species of hickory (bitternut, mockernut,
pignut, and shagbark). Associated trees include yellow poplar, blackgum, sugar maple, red maple,
white ash, green ash, American  elm, red elm, basswood, sweetgum,  and several pine species.
Black walnut, black cherry, American  beech, and eastern  hemlock  may also be present.  In
basins underlain by limestone, forests are comprised of blue ash, white ash, American elm, Ohio
buckeye, and red mulberry. Flat areas with impervious  soils support hydro-mesophytic forest
communities of pin oak, Shumard oak, cherry bark oak, sweetgum, red maple, white  elm, and
associated species such as swamp white oak, sourgum, white oak, shellbark hickory, beech, and
cottonwood.

     Land use impacts on stream quality are mainly from production  of livestock, poultry, and
crops.   Where  pastured cattle have  access to streams, stream banks become eroded through
trampling and removal of riparian vegetation.  Manure dispersal can have large effects on stream
water chemistry.  Many rivers have been channelized and/or dammed for flood control.  Such
alteration of seasonal hydrologic cycles decreases the array  of stream habitats for biota.  Strip
mines can have long-term physical and chemical effects over many stream miles. Seepage of
sludge from drilling sites in gas  and  oil fields can  affect water turbidity and  water chemistry.
Interior River Lowland (map unit #72)

     Varied land use potential is typical of the Interior River Lowland Ecoregion and includes:
forestry, diverse cropland agriculture, orcharding, production of livestock, and excavation for
fossil fuels. The ecoregion is comprised of a dissected glacial till plain (a portion of which is
covered by a moderately thick mantle of loess), rolling, narrow ridgetops, and hilly to steep
ridge slopes and valley sides (Photos 46-48). About 19,000 square miles, or two-thirds, of this
ecoregion occurs in the Upper Midwest.  Most of this area ranges between 400 and 600 feet in
elevation; however, elevation along the Mississippi River is around 300 feet, and a few hilltops
in southern Illinois exceed 1,000 feet.  Local relief varies from a few feet on the till plains, to
100 feet on rolling ridges, to nearly 600 feet on more prominent ridges.  Average annual rainfall
is between 35  and 46 inches,  and most precipitation occurs during  the freeze-free period.
Lakes, reservoirs,  and numerous ponds are scattered throughout the ecoregiogion

     Large watersheds in the  ecoregion cover as much as 350 square miles. A large exception is
the Saline  River in Illinois, draining more than 1,000 square miles. Streams in hills are often
intermittent, becoming perennial  when  they reach valley  floors.   Density of streams is
approximately two miles per square mile. Ditches and channelized streams are common in areas
of poor natural  soil drainage.

     Patterns of land use in the Interior River Lowland are more varied than in the neighboring


                                             42

-------
        Photo 46. The Interior River Lowland Ecoregion has a mosaic of land use patterns because the soils and
        topography are more locally variable than in many other ecoregions.
Corn Belt Plains and Interior Plateau regions. Drained alluvial soils are farmed intensively for
feed grains and hay for livestock, some corn, soybeans, and red clover seed.  Undrained sites
are used for forage crops (such as lespedeza), pasture, or timber (approximately one-third of the
area is forested).  Upland soils are used for mixed farming, livestock (mostly beef cattle, swine,
and poultry), some orcharding (peaches and apples), and, on a more local scale, grape vineyards.
Many square miles of this ecoregion have been strip-mined for  coal.  Oil and gas fields are
scattered throughout  the area.

     The  better  drained soils of this forested  ecoregion are generally light in color and
moderately acid.   Hapludalfs, dominate in silty loess,  glacial till,  and sandy aeolian materials.
Fragiudalfs have  formed on some silt-covered ridgetops. Paleudalfs are common on old cherty
limestones. Shallow Hapludolls occur on steep slopes.  Udif luvents, Fluvaquents, and Haplaquolls
are found in poorly drained floodplains.

     The Interior River  Lowland is mainly a region of oak/hickory forest. White oak,  black
oak, red oak, bitternut hickory, shagbark hickory, yellow poplar, white ash, sugar maple, and
black walnut occur on well drained sites.  Pin oak,  shingle oak, and sweetgum join on wetter
sites.  Riparian  areas support  pin  oak,  silver  maple, cottonwood,  willow,  sycamore,  elm,
sweetgum, ash, and river birch.

     The greatest land use impacts on stream water quality in the Interior River Lowland  result
from crop and livestock production and strip mining.  Channelization of streams and construction
of drainage ditches  decrease stream  habitat for biota in many  streams.  Soil  erosion and

                                             43

-------
  Photo 47.
         Photos 47 and 48. Approximately one-third of the
         Interior  River  Lowland  Ecoregion  is  forested,
         dominated mainly by oak and hickory species.
                                                  Photo 48.
44

-------
sedimentation can be severe on cultivated slopes.  Runoff delivery of farm chemicals, used
extensively in some areas (as near the Wabash River), alters water chemistry in many streams.
Where livestock have access to streams, trampling of stream banks and grazing of riparian
vegetation reduce stream bank stability.  Deposition of animal wastes into streams directly, or
by manure dispersal mechanisms, strongly alters stream chemistry.  Seepage of sludge from oil
and gas fields has local effects on water quality of nearby streams.  Strip mining activities have
long-term effects on stream quality.
APPLICATIONS

     The primary function of the ecoregion map is to provide a geographic framework for
organizing aquatic ecosystem resource information. This framework should improve the ability of
managers, planners, and scientists to: (1) compare the similarities and differences of land/water
relationships;  (2) determine reasonably attainable water quality conditions consistent  with
regional patterns of tolerances and resilience to human impacts; (3) locate sites for monitoring,
demonstration, or reference; (4) extrapolate from existing site-specific studies; and (5) predict
the effects of changes in land use and pollution controls.  Specific applications will vary among
States  and  regions,  as  do the  issues  of concern  such  as  nonpoint  source  pollution,
eutrophication, and sensitivity of forest and water resources to acidification.  In spite of (or
perhaps because of) these differences, there is a significant need  to understand the spatial
patterns of realistically attainable conditions and quality of aquatic ecosystems.

     Initial efforts to use this ecoregion  framework  are underway in Arkansas, Colorado,
Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wisconsin. These statewide
projects focus on the attainable ranges of chemical quality  and biotic assemblages in aquatic
systems. A typical application involves three steps:
     1.    Transfer boundaries of ecoregions and their most typical portions  to  State-level
          (normally l:500,000-scale) maps.7
     2.    Select and sample streams, or lakes, or watersheds within the most typical portions of
          each ecoregion. Each selected stream/watershed should have a relative lack of human
          disturbance^  and be  reasonably typical in  terms of overall land-surface form,
          vegetation, soil, and land use characteristics.  For example, one would not expect a
          "typical" stream draining 125 square miles in the Western Corn Belt Plains to be void
          of cropland, or even with less than 75 percent cropland.  However, there are streams
          of that  size  in  that ecoregion  that drain watersheds  having a relative lack  of
   7 Caution must be used when transferring the ecoregion boundaries to larger scale maps.
    Ecoregions do not start and end at precise lines; there are transition areas along  the
    boundaries. Correctly locating these boundaries at a larger scale requires concurrent
    analysis with the original information used to define the ecoregion.

   8The selection of less impacted sites addresses the notion of "reasonably attainable quality".
    These sites represent the best quality of aquatic biotic habitat that  can currently  be
    found in an ecoregion.  Thus, under present land use conditions, it  is possible to attain
    such a level of aquatic habitat quality; to attain quality surpassing this level would require
    major alterations in land use practices, which may not be considered "reasonable" within
    the constraints imposed on resource  managers.

                                             45

-------
         of  that size in that ecoregion that drain watersheds  having a  relatiyg  lack  of
         population density and industrial impact, a relative abundance of woody  riparian
         vegetation, and relatively little stream channelization.


     3.   Map and statistically analyze data to determine:  the regional patterns of attainable
         aquatic  ecosystem  quality;  the   relationship  between  ecosystem  quality  and
         stream/watershed size; the variation of quality within and between ecoregions; and the
         regional properties that appear to be most helpful in explaining these variations and,
         thus, enabling more precise predictions of attainable quality.
Applications in Ohio

     The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) has been interested in determining
reasonably attainable water quality and biological integrity in streams.  In previous monitoring
programs, sampling was on a case-by-case basis, focused on highly disturbed stream systems.
This approach was not suited for  extrapolation of information from one stream system to
another, so a regional ecological stratification was devised to address this need.

     Streams that were regionally representative and least impacted by management practices
were selected for sampling.   Numerical data from these  streams were analyzed to provide
information on regionally attainable stream quality. Sampling included a variety of measurements
relating  to  nutrient  richness, ionic  strength, concentration  of  metals,  and  biological
characteristics (including  fish assemblages) (Whittier et al. 1987). Examples of stream data
analyses are described below.

     Distinct regional differences are most apparent in two of Ohio's five  ecoregions.  The
Huron/Erie Lake Plain Ecoregion of northwestern Ohio is characterized by nearly flat terrain,
poor soil drainage, extensive farming,  stream channelization,  and a lack  of woody riparian
vegetation.   In contrast,  the  Western Allegheny Plateau Ecoregion  in southeastern Ohio  is
characterized by the mostly forested, steep, rugged terrain  of a dissected  plateau.  The
remaining  ecoregions in  Ohio consist  of  characteristics intermediate between those of the
Huron/Erie Lake Plain and the Western Allegheny Plateau.

     Regional differences in fish assemblages are most pronounced in the Huron/Erie Lake Plain
and Western Allegheny Plateau Ecoregions. Regional species signatures (Figure 1) indicate that
the dominant fish of the  Huron/Erie Lake Plain Ecoregion are  those considered tolerant of
turbid conditions and low concentrations of dissolved oxygen (Becker 1983; Pflieger 1975; Smith
1979; Trautman  1981).   The species signature of the contrasting Western Allegheny Plateau
indicates dominance by a number of moderately intolerant and  intolerant fish species.  The
species signatures of the other three Ohio  ecoregions are transitional.

     In  a similar fashion,  analyses of Ohio stream chemistry also shows the greatest degree of
regional difference between the Huron/Erie Lake Plain and Western Allegheny Plateau Ecoregions
(Figure  2). Using a principal component analysis (PCA), data for sites in different ecoregions
cluster together, illustrating the degree  of regional homogeneity (the data would be randomly
distributed over the graph if there were no regional  patterns in water quality). Because streams
sampled were minimally impacted,  as well as representative, circumscribed areas in Figure 2
indicate the range of attainable water quality (given current land use practices) within each
ecoregion.

     Streams in the intensively farmed Huron/Erie  Lake Plain Ecoregion are characterized by

                                            46

-------
       n""T°d
CL

0)
0)
'i_
111
c
o
                        Q_

                        0
                        XL
                        CO
                        _l

                        g

                        ra


                        O

                        ^£
_co
Q.

C
O
.c
O>
C
o
w

I
                                                                              —r~
                                                                               o
                                                                               CO
                                                                            —I	r—
                                                                             o    o
                                                                             n    CM
CO
yj

O
LJJ
Q.
05
II
a  £
5  o
                                  5   *.
                                                                                                                re —^

                                                                                                                o3 P
 Pli
 M-oca

 'O * r-
i   SS   o
: i. g, o 5 o>
5 " o £ = £
 ujtrcoOTO
Bluntnose minnow
n
3
.C
0
JC
CO
CO
k.
o
.c
(0
c
3
CO
c
0)
0>
5
Johnny darter
Blackstripe topminnow
White sucker
•o
CO
CD
£
3
.a
s
o
"o
>
Fathead minnow
Common carp
Greenside darter
Q>
C
!c
CO
c

-------
o
Q-
i—/
I

O
z
UJ
DC
CO
O
z
o
       5 -
       4 -
      3  -
      2  -
1 -
 0-
-1 -
     -2 -
           /
\
 \
 \


/-
        ,
           D
          D
                          •,0
                                  \
                                    \
                                \
                                 \


                                   \

                                O  I

                                          -
                      v
                    T  T
      -3 -
      -4-
          D     u

          "*   k
        \  n     /D
                                              •  Huron/Erie  Lake Plain

                                              O  Eastern  Corn  Belt Plains
                                              V  Erie/Ontario Lake Plain
                                              A  Interior  Plateau
                                              D  Western  Allegheny  Plateau
                  i
                -2
                        -1
                           l
                           0
                                         i
                                         2
                                        i
                                        3
i
4
l
5
i
6
i
7
l
8
                                      NUTRIENT  RICHNESS CPCA  1}
                Figure 2. Principal component axis I scores for nutrient richness and ionic strength variables sampled for Ohio
                streams. Attainable water quality for each region is inferred from circumscribed areas (coded to correspond with
                ecoregions). Dashed enclosures have been estimated by eye to suggest range of attainable water quality for each
                region (Larsen, Dudley, and Hughes 1988).
                                                    48

-------
nutrient-rich water with high ionic strength. By contrast, streams in the more forested Western
Allegheny Plateau Ecoregion show lower levels of ionic strength (though a wider range than the
Huron/Erie Lake Plain Ecoregion) and much lower concentrations of nutrients.  Although there
may be great overlap in one set of ecoregion characteristics (e.g., the range in ionic strength
for the Western Allegheny Plateau and Erie/Ontario Lake  Plain Ecoregions), there may be
distinct separation between another set of characteristics (e.g., the range in nutrient richness
for these two ecoregions).  This illustrates the importance of assessing a suite of parameters
(rather than a single parameter) in determining ecosystem regions.
Applications in Minnesota

     The  Minnesota Pollution  Control Agency (MPCA) is responsible for assessment and
management of pollution  in the State's more than  12,000 lakes.  Much  of the focus of
assessment and management is  on trophic state of lakes and the  role of phosphorus control.
Lakes are routinely sampled for various trophic state indicators including phosphorus and Secchi
depth. Regional patterns in productivity of Minnesota surface waters have been previously noted
(e.g., Moyle  1956) and generally thought to  be  related to geology, hydrology, vegetation, and
land use.  These observations have influenced  fishery and wildlife management in the State
(Heiskary, Wilson, and Larsen 1987).

     From 1980 to  1985,  approximately nine  percent of Minnesota's lakes  were sampled.
Although these lakes were not selected with an ecoregional framework in mind, (i.e., regionally
representative and minimally impacted), Heiskary, Wilson, and Larsen (1987) used this framework
to interpret the available data'. The lakes (about 30 percent of the State's  total lake surface
area) occur in four of Minnesota's seven ecoregions (only two percent of Minnesota's lakes are
found outside these  regions):  the Northern Lakes and Forests, the North Central Hardwood
Forests,  the  Northern Glaciated  Plains,  and the Western Corn Belt Plains.  Following is  a
summary, by ecoregion, of the results and recommendations suggested by Heiskary, Wilson, and
Larsen (1987) (Figure 3).

     The Northern Lakes  and Forests Ecoregion, dominated by forests, lakes, and marsh, had
very low concentrations of total phosphorus, with a median of 23 ug/1. Median Secchi disk
transparency was 2.7 meters. Lakes in this region tend to be small and deep and are sensitive
to small  changes in phosphorus levels.

     The North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregion is typified by a variety of land uses. Fifty
percent of the region is cultivated, interspersed with pasture, cleared land, prairie, and forest.
Regional data exhibit a large range in total phosphorus concentration, 2 to 454 ug/1. Although
this range is wide, 90 percent of the lakes sampled were below  150 ug/1. Median phosphorus
concentration was 50 ug/1. Lakes in this region are generally small and deep.  Median Secchi
disk transparency measured 1.5 meters. Phosphorus concentrations greater than 150 ug/1 likely
result  from extensive urban or  agricultural runoff.

     The Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion is primarily under cultivation, but about 10 percent
is pasture or cleared  land (no longer under cultivation). Lakes in this region are typically large,
but shallow. Median total phosphorus concentration  was 121 ug/1.  Median Secchi disk
     ^Sources contributing available data included the MPCA (80%); the Metropolitan Council
     (9%); the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service (6%); and miscellaneous others
      (5%).

                                             49

-------



300 -
0 250 -
O)
D
* — / _
CO
g 200 H
O
I
CL
o 15°-
I
CL

|5 100 -
0
h- ~
50 -
-
0 -
















H


















~L





















i









.. 4.


















0
ts


















4

,







J



c



]





C
H



)

r 449
1422







)


•




..

d°j v
^
1
	 i



A
1

B





C D
                                                                                  I    rV
  90 -

— 75 •
                                                                                            —Median <»
                                                                                            — 25 -

                                                                                              10 -
                                                                                     Relative
                                                                                    Sample Size
                                 ECOREGION
Figure 3. Total phosphorus values for Minnesota lakes, by ecoregion (adapted from Heiskary, Wilson, and Larsen
1987). A=Northern Lakes and Forests,  B = North Central Hardwood Forests,  C=Western Corn Belt  Plains,
D=Northern Glaciated Plains.
                                               50

-------
transparency was 0.5 meters.

     Ninety percent of the Northern Glaciated  Plains Ecoregion is cultivated; the rest is in
pasture, cleared land, and prairie.  The median total phosphorus concentration in these lakes was
176 ug/1.  Median Secchi disk transparencies measured 0.8 meters.

     Based on this regional analysis of total in-lake phosphorus, Heiskary, Wilson, and Larsen
(1987) suggested the following management strategies:

         Northern Lakes and Forests.  Management emphasis should be to protect the high
         quality lakes and reduce phosphorus concentrations in  lakes with phosphorus levels
         above  20 ug/1 exhibiting water quality problems.  These levels appear regionally
         attainable.
         North Central Hardwood Forests.  Frequency of summer algal blooms can probably be
         reduced if lake phosphorus concentrations are maintained at or below the median level
         of 50 ug/1. Implementation of "best management practices" to reduce total phosphorus
         export in the watersheds of  these lakes should prove  helpful in this region where
         nonpoint sources of phosphorus are important. In-lake remedial measures may also be
         necessary to attain total phosphorus concentration less  than 50 ug/I in the shallower
         lakes.
         Western Corn Belt Plains. Lakes cannot be expected to attain the quality of those in
         the Northern Lakes and Forests or North Central Hardwood Forests Ecoregions.  A
         reasonable goal for this naturally fertile region might be no more than 100 ug/1 total
         phosphorus. Lakes which cannot attain this level are probably unsuitable for primary
         contact recreation during much  of the  open  water season.   For these lakes,
         management emphasis could be directed towards maintenance of a fishery or wildlife
         habitat.
         Northern Glaciated Plains. Like the Western Corn Belt Plains, this region is fertile,
         and attainable lake quality will be governed both by natural fertility and agricultural
         practices. Lakes have large surface areas, but are shallow. Although directives for
         the Northern Glaciated Plains should be "similar to those of the Western Corn Belt
         Plains, it will be more  difficult to attain lake phosphorus below levels promoting
         summer  algal bloom.

     Based on this evaluation of  lake phosphorus and Secchi disk transparency, measurable
regional differences are evident in the water quality of Minnesota's lakes.

     In another application, the MPCA examined trends in  stream water quality over  time
(Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 1986) using data collected from monitoring stations in all
seven Minnesota ecoregions.  Data for  water quality attributes such as dissolved oxygen, un-
ionized ammonia, nitrate-nitrite concentration, and total suspended solids were plotted for water
years'^ 1975 to 1985 and trends were noted . As an example, data from nitrate-nitrite (NC«3-
NC>2) concentrations are presented by ecoregion (Figure 4). Nitrates are found in agricultural
       water year is calculated over a twelve-month period beginning each October.

                                            51

-------
                       Driftless Area
 O)
 E
0.210
0.163
0.116
0.068
0.021
                      Red River Valley
1.71 -
1.29 -
0.86 -
0.43 -
   0
                                                                  Northern Glaciated  Plains
 CM
O
Z
 i
 CO
O
0.120 -
0.092 -
0.065 -
0.037 -
0.009
         Northern Lakes and Forests
                                     i   I   r
   8 -
   6 -
   4 -
   2 -
   0
         Western  Corn Belt Plains
                                                                  I   I   I   I   I   I   F   I  I   I   I   I
               Northern Minnesota Wetlands
       0.070  -
       0.055  -
       0.040  -
       0.024  -
       0.009
                 i   i  i   i   i   i   i   i   r  r   i   i
             73 74 75 76  77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
                                                        North Central Hardwood  Forests
                                                    1.01 -i
                                                   0.80 -
                                                   0.59 -
                                                   0.37 -
                                                   0.16
                      WATER  YEAR
                                                            i   i   i   i  i   i   ii  ii   i   i
                                                        73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
                                                                  WATER   YEAR
             Figure 4. Nitrate-nitrite values for Minnesota streams, by ecoregion (adapted from Minnesota Pollution Control
             Agency 1986). Values are expressed as medians of all observations for each water year. Solid line indicates best
             fitting trend line. Note that scaling on Y-axis differs for each ecoregion.
                                               52

-------
fertilizers and often carried to streams via artificial drainages and surface runoff.  Ambient
levels of NO3-NO2 in Minnesota differ among regions.  In the Western Corn Belt Plains, for
example, median concentrations range from less than one, to eight milligrams per liter.  In the
Northern Minnesota Wetlands, yearly median concentrations are substantially lower, from 0.009 to
0.07 mg/1. Significant increases in NC>3-NO2 concentrations over the 10-year sample period have
occurred in the agricultural Driftless Area and Northern Glaciated Plains Ecoregions.  Though
nitrates, alone,  at these  levels may not  be important  stream pollutants, the  increasing
concentration in streams due to farm runoff may indicate that other, more detrimental water-
soluble contaminants are leaking into streams. Thus, specific land use related pollutants may be
regionally defined and monitored.
                                             53

-------
LITERATURE CITED

Anderson, J. R. 1970. Major land uses. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). In: The national atlas of the
     United States of America. U.S. Geological Survey.  Washington, D.C. (revised from a map
     by F. J.  Marschner).  Plates 158-159.
Austin, M. E.  1965, revised 1972. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the
     United States.  Agriculture Handbook 296. USDA Soil Conservation Service. Washington,
     D.C. 156 pp.
Bailey, R. G.  1976. Ecoregions of the United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000).  USDA Forest
     Service.   Intermountain Region.  Ogden, Utah.
Baldwin, J. L.  1973. Climates of the United States. U.S. Department of Commerce, National
     Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington,
     D.C. 113 pp.
Becker, G.C.   1983.  Fishes of Wisconsin.   The  University of Wisconsin Press,  Madison,
     Wisconsin.  1052 pp.
Braun, E. L.  1974.  Deciduous forests of eastern North  America. The Free Press, New York.
     (reprint of 1950 edition). 596 pp.
Crowley, J. M.  1967.  Biogeography.   Canadian Geographer 11:312-326.
Fenneman, N. M. 1946. Physical divisions of the United States. Map (scale 1:7,000,000). U.S.
     Geological Survey. Reston, Virginia.
Gersmehl, P.J. 1977.  Soil taxonomy  and mapping.  Annals of  the Association of American
     Geographers 67:419-428-428.
Hammond, E. H. 1970. Classes of land-surface form. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). In: The national
     atlas of the United States of America.  U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C. Plates
     62-63.
Herbertson, A. J.   1905.  The major natural regions:  an essay  in  systematic geography.
     Geographical Journal 25:300-312.
Heiskary, S. A., C. B. Wilson, and D. P. Larsen.  1987. Analysis of regional lake water quality
     patterns:   Implications for  lake  management in Minnesota.   In:   Lake and  reservoir
     management 3:337-344.  North American Lake Management Society, Washington, D. C.
     Figure reprinted by permission.
Hughes, R. M., and  J. M. Omernik.  1981. A proposed approach to determine regional patterns
     in aquatic ecosystems.   In:  Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory
     information, proceedings of a symposium. October 28-30,1981. Portland, Oregon. Western
     Division, American Fisheries Society,  pp.  92-102.
Hunt, C.  B. 1979. Surficial geology. Color proof of unpublished map (scale 1:7,500,000) of the
     United States.  U.S. Geological Survey.  Washington, D.C.
Kuchler, A. W. 1970. Potential natural vegetation.  Map (scale 1:7,500,000).  In:  The national
     atlas of the United States of America. U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C. Plates
     90-91.
	. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential natural vegetation
     of the conterminous United States. American Geographical Society. Special Publication No.
     36.  New York, New York.  116 pp.
Larsen, D. P., D. R. Dudley, and R.M. Hughes.   1988.  A regional approach for assessing
     attainable surface water quality:   An Ohio case study.  J.  Soil and Water Conservation
     43:171-176.  Copyrighted; figure reprinted by permission.
Minnesota Pollution Control  Agency.  1986.  Minnesota water quality, water years 1984-1985.
     Report to the Congress of the U.S.  Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Roseville, MN.
     69 pp.
Moyle, J.B. 1956.  Relationships between the chemistry of Minnesota surface waters and wildlife
     management.   Journal of Wildlife Management 20:303-320.
                                            54

-------
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.   1974.  Climates of the states.   Water
     Information Center, Inc., Manhasset Isle, Port Washington, New York. Vols. 1, 2.  975 pp.
Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Lands and Soil.  1973.  Know Ohio's soil
     regions. Map (scale 1:500,000). Columbus, Ohio.
Omernik, J. M.   1987.  Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. The Annals of the
     Association of American Geographers.  77:118-125.
Omernik, J. M., M. A. Shirazi, and R. M. Hughes. 1982. A synoptic approach for regionalizing
     aquatic  ecosystems.   In:   In-place resource inventories:   principles  and  practices,
     proceedings of a national workshop.  August 9-14, 1981.  University of Maine, Orono,
     Maine. Society of American Foresters,  pp.  199-218.
Pflieger, W.L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson
     City.  343 pp.
Society of American Foresters.  1980.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. F.
     H. Eyre, ed. Washington, D.C.  148  pp.
Smith P.W.  1979. The Fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Chicago, Illinois.  314pp.
Trautman, M.B.  1981.  The fishes of Ohio.  Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio.
     782 pp.
Trewartha, G. T. 1943. An introduction to weather and climate. McGraw-Hill Cook Company,
     New York,  2nd ed.  545 pp.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of
     forest and range ecosystems.  Agriculture Handbook no. 475.  U.S. Government Printing
     Office, Washington, D.C. 68 pp.
	. 1970. Major forest types. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). In: The national
     atlas of the  United States of America.  U.S. Geological Survey.  Washington, D.C. Plates
     154-155.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1981.  Land resource regions and
     major land resource areas of the United States.  Agricultural Handbook 296.  U.S.
     Government Printing Office.  Washington, D.C.  Map (scale 1:7,500,000) 156 pp.
	. 1975. Soil taxonomy, a basic system of soil classification for making
     and interpreting soil surveys. Agriculture Handbook no. 436.  U.S. Government Printing
     Office, Washington, D.C. 754 pp.
	. 1970. Distribution of principal kinds of soils: Orders, suborders, and
     great groups.  Map (scale 1:7,500,000). In:  The national atlas of the United States of
     America. U.S. Geological Survey.  Washington, D.C.  Plates 86-87.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Surveys of the States of the North Central Region. 1957.
     Soils of the North Central Region of the United States.  North Central regional publication
     no. 76, Bulletin 544. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
     192 pp.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1985.  1982 Census of agriculture. Volume 2,
     Subject series. Parti.  Graphic summary.  U.S. Government Printing Office: 83-600308.
     188 pp.
	.  1982. 1978 Census of agriculture. Volume 5, Special reports. Part 1.
     Graphic summary.  U.S. Government Printing Office:  0-365-907: QL 2.  177 pp.
	.  1978. 1974 Census of agriculture. Volume 4, Special reports. Parti.
     Graphic summary.  U.S. Government  Printing Office:  0-264-545.  189 pp.
    	. 1973. 1969 Census of agriculture. Volume 5, Special reports. Part 15.
     Graphic summary.  U.S. Government Printing Office:  0-529-261.  145 pp.
U.S. Geological Survey.   1982.  Hydrologic unit map of the United States.  Map (scale
     1:5,000,000).  U.S. Government Printing Office.  Washington, D.C.
	. 1970. Organic fuel deposits. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). In: The national
     atlas of the United States of America. Washington, D.C.  Plates 186-187.
Weeks, R.A.  1970. Resources and production of major metals.  Map (scale 1:7,500,000).  In:
     The national atlas of the United States of America. U.S. Geological Survey. Washington,

                                            55

-------
Whittier, T.R., D.P. Larsen, R.M. Hughes, C.M. Rohm, A.L. Gallant and J.M. Omernik. 1987. The
    Ohio  stream  regionalization project  A compendium of results.   U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR.  EPA/600/3-87/025. 66 pp.
                                         56

-------