EPA/540/8-91/067
                                Publication 9355.6-04
                                        July 1991
   ROD ANNUAL REPORT
            FY 1990
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Washington, DC  20460
                              {Sp Printed on Recycled Paper

                     U S. Erttawnert.^^

                     ffitt'JSw.-.'.', i..
                     Chicago, IL 60604-StoJ

-------
                                         NOTICE

The  policies and  procedures  set forth here are intended  as  guidance to Agency and  other
government employees.  They do not constitute rulemaking by the Agency, and may not be relied
on to create a substantive or procedural right enforceable by any other person.  The Government
may take action that is at variance with the policies and procedures in this manual.

-------
                              CONTENTS

      Sections                                                        Page

I.     Introduction                                                         1
II.     Records Of Decision Abstracts                                       65
III.    Records Of Decision Summary Table: FY 1990                       209
IV.    Records Of Decision Summary Table: FY 1982-1989                   285
V.     Records Of Decision Keyword List:  FY 1982-1990                     445

-------
                                        SECTION I
                                     INTRODUCTION
FY 1990  marks  the fourth year  since  the
passage of the Superfund  Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA),  which
amended  the  Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980  (CERCLA).     During this  period,  the
remedial program has modified its approach in
site cleanups to reflect mandates in CERCLA,
as amended by SARA; for example. Section 121
of  CERCLA  mandates  the selection  of a
remedial action that is protective of human
health and  the  environment,  complies with
applicable or relevant and appropriate Federal
and    State   requirements   (ARARs),   is
cost-effective, and utilizes permanent solutions
and   alternative  treatment  technologies  or
resource recovery technologies to the maximum
extent practicable.     In  addition, CERCLA
includes a preference for remedies  that employ
treatment  that permanently  and  significantly
reduce  the  volume, toxicity, or  mobility of
hazardous wastes as a principal element, and
requires an explanation in those cases in which
the selected  remedy  does  not  satisfy  this
preference.  The  Records of Decision (RODs)
listed    in   this  annual  report    document
compliance  with  these  mandates  for  the
remedial program in FY 1990.   All of the FY
1990  RODs were approved at the Regional
level,  which is consistent  with  the  policy
initiated in FY 1986  to delegate ROD approval
authority to the Regions.

FY 1990 RODs

One hundred sixty-one (161) RODs and seven
(7) ROD  Amendments, including  Fund-lead,
Enforcement, and  Federal Facility  RODs were
signed during FY 1990.   The data in this ROD
Annual  Report are based on these 168 RODs
and ROD  Amendments; for clarity, however,
these  are  collectively  referred  to  as  RODs
throughout the remainder of the report.  Sixty
(60) of  the FY 1990 RODs  addressed source
control  only,   and  thirty-four   (34)  RODs
addressed  ground  water remediation only.
Sixty-five  (65)  RODs  selected both source
control  and   ground   water   remediation
components, and the remaining nine (9) RODs
were  no action/no further action  (see Exhibit
1).  Of the total 125 source control RODs, 106
addressed  a final remedy, and the remaining 19
addressed  an interim remedy. Of the total 34
ground water only RODs, 27 addressed a final
remedy, and 7 addressed an interim remedy for
the site.

In keeping with CERCLA Section 121  and the
National  Contingency  Plan  (NCP)  program
expectations to treat highly toxic, highly mobile
wastes and contain low level wastes or large
volumes of waste, source control treatment was
selected in 88 of the 106 final source  control
RODs  (see Exhibit 1).    Also in  keeping with
NCP   program  expectations,  ground  water
should be returned to its beneficial uses within
a  reasonable time  frame,  when practicable.
This expectation  has been  evidenced by  the
selection of active ground water restoration, in
addition  to  a source  control  remedy,  in 59
RODs; and  selection of active ground  water
restoration  in 32 RODs where source  control
was not being addressed.

Exhibits 1 through 14 summarize various data
from  the 168  FY  1990 RODs.   Exhibit 1
provides  an overview of the types of remedial
action  selected for all FY  1990 RODs.   This
Exhibit reflects FY 1990 ROD compliance with
the CERCLA mandate  to  utilize  permanent
solutions.    Exhibit 2  provides a quantitative
summary of remedial action components by the
number of occurrences in RODs.   This exhibit
demonstrates that occurrences of the  use  of
treatment technologies (109) in selected source
control remedies exceeded that of containment
only remedy occurrences (35) by a factor  of
three.       Furthermore,   the  number   of
occurrences of ground water treatment was 192
compared with 26 occurrences of  nontreatment
remedies.   Of the 109 occurrences  of source
control   treatment   technologies,    thermal
destruction/incineration treatment was selected
most frequently (28 occurrences) with 2 RODs
using two types of thermal treatment, followed
by immobilization (24 occurrences), and In-situ
(19 occurrences).  In-situ vitrification was also
selected as treatment  (4 occurrences), which
represents  an increase  in  the  use  of this
treatment technology in the remedial program
compared to previous  fiscal years.   Exhibit 3
compares the number of source control RODs
employing   'containment'   as   a   primary
component  of   the  remedy   with  RODs
employing    'treatment'   as   a   principal
component.      Exhibit  4  illustrates  the

-------
occurrences  of  treatment  technologies  in  FY
1990  source  control  remedies  by  treatment
category.  Separation/recovery was the main
treatment  technology  category (33% of total
source control remedies), followed closely by
destruction/detoxification  technologies  (32%).
Immobilization  was employed as  a  source
control treatment in 22% of the remedies.  The
remaining 13% of technology occurrences were
unspecified  treatment  technologies (9%), or
in-situ vitrification (4%).  Of the 109 treatment
technologies selected, 96 were selected in final
source control RODs, while 13 were selected in
interim source control  RODs.

Exhibit 5 shows the total number of treatment
occurrences (192) for ground water remedies in
FY 1990 RODs. The majority of ground water
treatment   occurrences   (79%)   were
physical/chemical   treatment   technologies
including air stripping (46), carbon adsorption
(28),  and   precipitation   (19).     Biological
treatment   was  employed  in  4%  of   the
treatments.   Two  categories  comprised  the
remaining 17%: unspecified or to be determined
treatment technologies (9%), and treatment at  a
publicly  owned   treatment  works  (POTW)
facility (8%).

An  index  of site  remedies  for  FY  1990 is
provided in  Exhibit 6, which contains RODs
grouped by the specific type of source  control
and/or non-source control remedy selected. To
assist in understanding  the  technology  data
presented in Exhibits 1 through 6, a description
of  each  source  control  and ground water
treatment category is provided in Exhibit 7.

Historical Overview FY 1982-1990

The   passage of   SARA  strengthened  and
extended   the   Superfund  program  while
maintaining  the   overall   framework   for
implementation.    New  requirements under
CERCLA, as amended by SARA, were intended
to  ensure   protective  cleanup   standards,
permanent remedies, and the use of alternative
technologies, where applicable.   A  historical
overview of FY 1982-1990 RODs is provided in
Exhibits 8 through 12  to show annual progress
in achieving statutory mandates. This overview
includes data collected for the FY  1990 RODs
in Exhibits 1 through  6.  Exhibit 8 depicts the
number of RODs signed  per fiscal year, which
demonstrates that there  has been  a marked
increase in the number of RODs signed since
the enactment  of SARA (October  17, 1986).
Exhibit  9 is  a quantitative overview  of the
occurrences and type of treatment technologies
which  have been  selected in source  control
RODs.  An index of the ROD sites where these
treatment  technologies   were   selected  is
provided in Exhibits 10 and 11.

Comparative data on the number of RODS and
number   of   occurrences   of   treatment
technologies   selected   for  source   control
remedies in post-SARA RODs (FY  1987-1990)
are presented  in  Exhibit 12.   These  data
demonstrate that, in accordance  with  SARA,
there   has  been:    (1) an  increase   in  the
percentage  of  RODs selecting treatment  as  a
principal element of source control, and (2) an
increase  in  the  percentage  of  innovative
treatment technologies  selected (see Exhibit 9).
Exhibit  13  provides  a   comparison  of FY
1982-1990 ROD data on remedial action costs.
Exhibits  14   and   15  show   and  list  the
information for FY 1990 treatment train RODs,
i.e. RODs  which  employ  a  sequence  of
treatment technologies  to  a single medium or
constituent.

During FY 1990, EPA initiated a comprehensive
effort  between  several   offices  to   achieve
consistency of historical ROD data with respect
to current definitions of treatment technologies,
and  interim   and   final  remedial  action
categories.    The  results  of  this  effort are
evidenced in this report, and in the Exhibit 7
descriptions of treatment categories.

FY 1990 ROD Annual Report Sections
The FY 1990 ROD Annual Report is designed
to provide the Regions, Headquarters, and the
public with summary information on FY 1990
RODs  and  historical   information  on   FY
1982-1990 RODs.  The report should be used as
a  reference  document.   To  ensure ease of
reference, the material in this report is divided
into the following sections:

    •   Introduction   -   highlights
        accomplishments   in   the  remedial
        program, and compliance with CERCLA
        and the NCP.

    •   FY 1990 ROD Abstracts - describes site
        conditions, key  contaminants, selected
        remedial  actions, specific performance
        standards   and   goals   for   key
        contaminants,   institutional   controls,

-------
    remedial    action   costs,    operation
    and    maintenance    costs,   and
    site-specific   keywords   for   each
    FY 1990 ROD.

•   FY  1990   ROD  Summary   Table  -
    provides  the  remedial  action number
    (e.g., 1st, 2nd,  etc.), and summarizes
    the contaminants by media,  estimated
    waste volume,  major components of
    the selected remedy, cleanup goals for
    key contaminants,  present   worth  or
    capital   costs,  and  operation  and
    maintenance costs for  each  FY  1990
    ROD.

•   FY 1982-1989 ROD  Summary Table -
    provides  the  remedial  action location
    and   date,   and   summarizes   the
    contaminants   by   media,   estimated
    waste volume,  major components of
    the selected remedy, cleanup goals for
    key  contaminants,  present  worth or
    capital   costs,  and  operation  and
    maintenance   costs  for   each   FY
    1982-1989 ROD.

•   ROD  Keyword  List  -  provides  a
    summary listing under each keyword
    of all RODs that have an association
    with  the  keyword based   on  the
    selected remedial  action.  A keyword
    list index is located at the beginning of
    the section.

-------
  A

  «T
   OC
   HI

   5
   Wf


"  0


   2
   DC


   §
   OC
                                              \\ti\\

                                                  II
                                                U T9 0) »-

-------
                                      Exhibit 2

              FY 1990 ROD REMEDIAL ACTION SUMMARY TABLE a
-------
CO
 X

UJ
UJ

Q
UJ

S
UJ
cc


o
or



O
O

UJ
o
cc
r>
o
CO

o
o>
O)
T-


U.
             C











>
O
UJ
111
cc
^J
o
1
0
0
LLJ
o
QC
O







1-
z
UJ
o
cc
111
Q.
U.
O
NUMBER
RODs















£
CO
c
^
mary compc
a.
ra
TO
IS

I
c
c
o
o


v°
b
CM



R
in
CO
o>
TO
CO
TO
TO
1
*O
C
CO
I
js
8
c
TO
1
O
Q-
8
O-
'o
c
Q.
TO
TO

C
0)
E
•«^
^


^o
CM



CO
CM



to
"co

1
2
"o
c
cr
c
'TO
8
a>
'(/)
!g
i3
hout onsite

o
.c
5 c
i. o
£ 1
E ™
to co
0) £
l± o


v? 'ip
O" 0s
§ w



O CM




























^o
O
T—


»

-------
     Ul*
        uj





(/)
Ul
§~


TREATMENT TECHNOL
^
Ul
u
oc
SI








CO
Separation/Recovery (31
i
s?
8
O)
c
.0
T5
S
w
LU
1—
2
In-situ Vacuum/Soil Vaf
Soil Washing (8)












Thermal Desorption (6)
Soil Flushing (2)











•^~^
Volatilization/Aeration (




oo"
Ci
c.
-^ .Q
H/ ^S
£2. ™
c S
o •?;
Destruction/Detoxificati
Thermal Destruction/Inc
1
3?
CM
CO









Bioremediation (5)
Dechlorination (2)












Immobilization (24)
Stabilization (8)
§
go
CM
CM





*— -.
^
^>
c 	
Solid if ication/Stabilizatio
Sorbent Solidification (5]








j-f.
c
c
c
Other/Unspecified Treat
D

«
o"
^/r
0)
o"
"o
c
-C
o
0)
1—
Technologies (14)
Unspecified Treatment

S?
§









In-srtu Vitrification (4)



*r
*•>
'5
!E
x
in
     Ji-D
     Oo
     wen
     UJo
     O<3>
     O

     O
                                                                                           £2

-------
   O>Q
   ZCC
to
8
C
£
I
0
o>
.0
E
3
Technology





(O CO
 Air Stripping
> Carbon Adsorption
* HN
1 18
o



O> CO





> Precipitation
> Granular Activated
Carbon
91




o> r-





» Filtration
> Ion Exchange
m




 Sedimentation
> UV Peroxidation
) Chemical Treatment
in




CO CO





> Flocculation
' Activated Alumina
01




CM CM CM





' Aeration
* Incineration
> pH Adjustment
iwu




T- J—





* Neutralization
> Reverse Osmosis
^ ti
11




CO





:al
> Biological Treatment
f ©
5



^





> Ex-Situ Bioremediation
®




oo in
^ ^





> Other/Unspecified
Treatment Technologies
> POTW
| 0 0
6



n>
CM
O>
"~





|

2II
x
UJ

-------
                                        Exhibit 6

                    INDEX  OF SITE REMEDIES  FOR FY  1990
 FISCAL YEAR  OF
 ROD SIGNATURE

        FY90
TECHNOLOGIES*1    REGION
Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
                      Immobilization (24)
1
1
1
2
2
2

2
2
2
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
6

6

6

6
6
7
                         7
                         7
                         8
                         8
                        10

                         1
                         2
                         3
                         3
SITE NAME. STATE

Beacon Heights Landfill, CT
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NHa
New Bedford, MAa
FAA Technical Center, NJ
Hooker 102nd Street, NY
Hooker Chemical-Ruco
  Polymer, NJ
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY
Sayreville Landfill, NJ
Sealand Restoration, NY
Greenwood Chemical, VAa
M.W. Manufacturing, PAa
Bofors Nobel, Mlb
Fisher Calo Chem, INa
Pristine (Amendment), OHa
St. Louis River, MN
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
  OKa-c
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,
  ARa
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
  ARa
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX
Vertac, AR
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,
  IAC
Hastings Groundwater
  Contamination (East Industrial
  Park), NEa
Missouri Electric Works, MO
Shenandoah Stables, MOa
Ogden Defense Depot, UT
Sand Creek Industrial, COa
FMC Yakima Pit, WA

New Bedford, MAa
Roebling Steel, NJa
C&R Battery, VA
Greenwood Chemical, VAa
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
" ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.

-------
                                       Exhibit  6
                   INDEX  OF SITE REMEDIES  FOR  FY 1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES3    REGION
                      Immobilization (24)
                      (Continued)
                      In-situ Vacuum/Vapor
                      Extraction (19)
                         3
                         4
                         4
                         4
                                               4
                                               4
                                               4
                                               5
                                               5

                                               5
                                               5
                                               6

                                               6

                                               7
                                               7
                                               8

                                               8

                                               9
                                              10
                         1
                         2
                         3
                         4
                         4
                         5
SITE  NAME.  STATE

M.W. Manufacturing, PAa
62nd Street Dump, FL
Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Cole man-Evans Wood
  Preserving (Amendment), FLa
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
  Disposal, FL
Schuylkill Metal, FL
Yellow Water Road, FL
Zellwood Groundwater
  Contamination (Amendment),
  FL
Oconomowoc Electroplating, Wl
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
  (USDOI), ILa
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,
  ARa
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
  ARa
Hastings Groundwater
  Contamination (East Industrial
  Park), NEa
Shenandoah Stables, MOa
Martin Marietta, Denver
  Aerospace, COa
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
  (OU17),CO
J.H. Baxter, CAa
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany
  (TWCA),OR

Stamina Mills, Rl
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY
Lord Shope Landfill, PA
Jadco-Hughes, NCa
SCRDI  Bluff Road, SC
Fisher Calo Chem, INa
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           10

-------
                                       Exhibit  6
                    INDEX  OF SITE  REMEDIES FOR  FY 1990
                                     (Continued)
 FISCAL  YEAR OF
 ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES^    REGION
                       In-situ Vacuum/Vapor
                       Extraction (19)
                       (Continued)
                      Other/Unspecified
                      Treatment Technologies
                      (10)
                      Soil Washing (8)
                         5
                         5
                         5
                         5
                         6
                                               7
                                               7
                         9
                         9
                         9

                         1
                         2
                         2
                         2
                         2
                         2
                         3
                         6
                         6
                         2
                         2
                         4
                         4

                         5

                         5
SITE NAME.  STATE

Hagen Farm, Wl
Pristine (Amendment), OHa
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
  OKa'c
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
  3001), OK
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
Waverly Groundwater
  Contamination, NE
Martin Marietta, Denver
  Aerospace, COa
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
  (OU18), CO
Intersil, CAa
Solvent Service, CAC
Watkins-Johnson, CA

Kearsarge, NHa
Mattiace Petrochemical, NY
Radium Chemical, NY
Roebling Steel, NJa
Sarney Farm, NYa
Solvent Savers, NY
Avtex Fibers, VA
Jacksonville, ARa
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
  ARa
Intersil, CAa

King of Prussia, NJ
Myers Property, NJa
Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Coleman-Evans Wood
  Preserving (Amendment), FLa
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
  Wla
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           11

-------
                                       Exhibit  6
                   INDEX  OF SITE REMEDIES  FOR  FY 1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES*    REGION
                      Soil Washing (8)
                      (Continued)

                      Thermal Desorptlon (6)
                      Bioremediation (5)
                      In-SItu Vitrification (4)
                      Dechlorination (2)


                      Soil Flushing (2)


                      Volatilization/ Aeration (1)

OTHER  TREATMENT (30)
                         6
                         8

                         2
                         2
                         2
                         5
                         5
                         8
                         4
                         5

                         5
                         9

                         5
                         5

                         6
                         8
                         2
                         4

                         3
                         3
                                               1
                                               2
                                               2
                                               2
SITE  NAME.  STATE

Arkwood, AR
Sand Creek Industrial, COa

American Thermostat, NY
Claremont Polychemical, NY
Sarney Farm, NYa
Bofors Nobel, Mlb-c
University of Minnesota, MN
Martin Marietta, Denver
  Aerospace, C0a>b

Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Dubose Oil Products, FL
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
 Wla
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl
J.H. Baxter, CAa

Anderson Development, Ml
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
  (USDOI), ILa
Crystal Chemical, TX
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
  (OU16),CO

Myers Property, NJa
Tenth Street  Dump/Junkyard, OK

US Titanium,  VA
Jadco-Hughes, NCa

Howe Valley Landfill, KY
                                   Coakley Landfill, NH
                                   American Thermostat, NY*
                                   Claremont Polychemical, NY*
                                   Hooker-102nd Street, NY*
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
D ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           12

-------
                                       Exhibit  6
                    INDEX  OF  SITE REMEDIES  FOR  FY 1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL  YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES*    REGION
OTHER  TREATMENT  (30)
(Continued)
CONTAINMENT  ONLY
                     Onsite (30)
                                               2
                                               2
                                               2
                                               3
                                               3
                                               3
                                               3
                                               3
                                               4
                                               5
                                               5
                                               5
                                               5
                                               5
                                               5
                                               5
                                               5

                                               5
                                               6
                                               8
                                               6
                                               6
                                               8
                                               8
                          1
                          2
SITE  NAME.  STATE
                                   Myers Property, NJ*
                                   Radium Chemical, NY*
                                   Robeling Steel, NJ
                                   Avtex Fibers, VA*
                                   Brown's Battery Breaking, PA*
                                   C&R Battery, VA*
                                   Dover Air Force Base, DE
                                   Fike Chemical, WV
                                   Schuylkill Metal, FL*
                                   Algoma Municipal Landfill, Wl*
                                   Anderson Development, Ml*
                                   Bofors Nobel, Ml*
                                   Hunts Disposal, Wl*
                                   Janesville Old Landfill, Wl*
                                   Metamora Landfill, Ml*
                                   Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, Wl*
                                   NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt,
                                    IL
                                   St, Louis River, MN*
                                   Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK*
                                   East Helena, MT
                                   Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR*
                                   Rogers Road Landfill, AR*
                                   Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT
                                   Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16),
                                    CO*
                                   Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
                                    CO*
                                   Operating Industries Landfill
                                    (Amendment), CA*
Old Springfield Landfill, VT
Scientific Chemical Processing,
 NJ
Syosset Landfill, NY
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           13

-------
                                       Exhibit 6
                    INDEX OF  SITE REMEDIES FOR FY  1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
     TECHNOLOGIES^     REGION
CONTAINMENT
(Continued)
ONLY
                      Onsite (30)
                      (Continued)
                                                3
                                                3
                                                3
                                                3
                                                3
                                                4

                                                4
                                                4
                                                4
                                                5
                                                5
                                                5

                                                5
                                                7

                                                7

                                                7

                                                7
                                                7
                                                8

                                                8

                                                8

                                                8

                                                8
                                                8
                                                9
                                               10
SITE  NAME.  STATE
                                         Coker's Sanitation Service
                                           Landfills, DE
                                         East Mt. Zion, PA
                                         Hranica Landfill, PA
                                         Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA
                                         Osborne Landfill, PA
                                         Walsh Landfill, PA
                                         Bypass 601  Groundwater
                                           Contamination, NCd
                                         Lewisburg Dump, TN
                                         North Hollywood Dump, TNd
                                         Pickettville Road Landfill, FL
                                         Janesville Ash Beds, Wl
                                         K&L Landfill, Ml
                                         Master Disposal Service Landfill,
                                          Wl
                                         Wheeler Pit, Wl
                                         Midwest Manufacturing/North
                                           Farm, IA
                                         Northwestern States Portland
                                           Cement, IA
                                         Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/
                                           Pits (USDOE), MO
                                         Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
                                         White Farm  Equipment Dump, IA
                                         Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 &
                                           #3), UTd
                                         Rocky Mountain Arsenal
                                           (OU20), CO
                                         Rocky Mountain Arsenal
                                           (OU23),  CO
                                         Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings),
                                          UT
                                         Silver Bow Creek, MT
                                         Whitewood Creek, SDd
                                         Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
                                         Silver Mountain Mine, WA
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           14

-------
                                       Exhibit  6

                    INDEX OF  SITE  REMEDIES FOR  FY  1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL  YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES^    REGION
CONTAINMENT  ONLY
(Continued)
                      Offsite (9)
OTHER  ACTIONS (2)
                      (Institutional
                      Controls, Relocation)
NON-SOURCE  CONTROL
                      Pump and Treatment
                      in Addition to a  Source
                      Control Remedy (59)
                          2
                          2

                          2
                          2
                          2
                                                4
                                                8
                          2
                         10
                          1
                          1
                          1
                          1
                          2
                          2
                          2
                          2
                          2
                          2
                          2

                          2
                          2
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
" ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
SITE NAME.  STATE
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ
Imperial Oil/Champion
  Chemicals, NJ
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ
Woodland Township Route
  532, NJ
Bypass 601 Groundwater
  Contamination, NCd
North Hollywood Dump, TNd
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 &
  #3), UTd
Whitewood Creek, SDd
Forest Glen Subdivision, NY
Louisiana-Pacific, CA
Coakley Landfill, NH
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH
Old Springfield, VT
Stamina Mills, Rl
American Thermostat, NY
Claremont Polychemical, NY
FAA Technical Center, NJ
Hooker-102nd Street, NY
King of Prussia, NJ
Myers Property, NJa
Scientific Chemical Processing,
 NJ
Solvent Savers, NY
Woodland Township
 Route 72, NJ
Woodland Township
 Route 532, NJ
                                           15

-------
                                       Exhibit 6
                    INDEX OF  SITE REMEDIES  FOR FY  1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL  YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
      TECHNOLOGIES3    REGION
NON-SOURCE
(Continued)
CONTOL
                      Pump and Treatment
                      in Addition to a  Source
                      Control Remedy (59)
                      (Continued)
                                3
                                3
                                3
                                4
                                4
                                4

                                4
                                4
                                4
                                5
                                5
                                5
                                5
                                5

                                5
                                5
                                5

                                5
                                5
                                5
                                5
                                5
                                5
                                6
                                6

                                6
                                6
SITE  NAME.  STATE
Keystone Sanitation,
  PA
Lord Shope Landfill, PA
Osborne Landfill, PA
US Titanium, VA
62nd Street Dump, FL
Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Coleman-Evans Wood
  Preserving (Amendment), FLa
Jadco-Hughes, NCa
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
Schuylkill Metal, FL
Bofors Nobel, Mlc
Fisher Calo Chem, IN
Hunts Disposal, Wl
Janesville Ash Beds, Wl
Janesville Old Landfill,
 Wl
K&L Landfill, Ml
Metamora Landfill, Ml
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
 Wla
Oconomowoc  Electroplating, Wl
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl
Pristine (Amendment),  OHa
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
University of Minnesota, MN
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
Crystal Chemical, TX
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
  OKa-c
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX
Tinker AFB  (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
  3001) OK
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,
  IAC
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           16

-------
                                       Exhibit  6
                    INDEX OF  SITE REMEDIES  FOR  FY 1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL  YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
      TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION
SITE  NAME.  STATE
NON-SOURCE
(Continued)
CONTROL
                      Pump and Treatment
                      in Addition to a Source
                      Control Remedy (59)
                      (Continued)
                                7
                                7

                                7
                                7
                                                7
                                                8

                                                8
                                                8
                                                8
                                                9
                                                9
                                                9
                                                9
             Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
             Midwest Manufacturing/North
               Farm, IA
             Missouri Electric Works, MO
             Northwestern States Portland
               Cement, IA
             Waverly Groundwater
               Contamination, NE
             White Farm Equipment Dump, IA
             Martin Marietta, Denver
               Aerospace, COa
             Ogden Defense Depot, UT
             Rocky Mountain Arsenal
               (OU17),CO
             Rocky Mountain Arsenal
               (OU18), CO
             Rocky Mountain Arsenal
               (OU20), CO
             Silver Bow Creek, MT
             Intersil, CAa
             J.H. Baxter, CAa
             Solvent Service, CAa
             Watkins-Johnson, CA
                      Pump and Treatment
                      Only (32) (Continued)
                                2
                                2

                                2
                                2
                                2
                                2
                                3
                                3
             Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
             Cinnaminson Groundwater
               Contamination, NJ
             Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NYC
             Lone Pine Landfill,  NJ
             Mannheim Avenue  Dump, NJ
             Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ
             Army Creek Landfill, DE
             Croydon TCE Spill, PA
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
k ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
^ ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           17

-------
                                       Exhibit 6
                    INDEX OF  SITE REMEDIES FOR  FY  1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
      TECHNOLOGIES3    REGION
NON-SOURCE
(Continued)
CONTROL
                      Pump and Treatment
                      Only (32) (Continued)
OTHER GROUND  WATER REMEDIES
ALTERNATE  WATER  SUPPLY (6)
                                3
                                3
                                3
                                3
                                4
                                4
                                4

                                4
                                5
                                5
                                5

                                5
                                5

                                5
                                5
                                6
                                8
                                8
                                8

                                9
                                9
                                9
                                9
                               10
                                                2
                                                3
                                                3
                                                4
                                                5
                                               10
SITE  NAME.  STATE
Cryo-Chem, PA
Raymark, PA
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD
Tyson Dump #1, PA
City Industries, FL
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL
Hipps Road Landfill
  (Amendment), FL
Munisport Landfill, FL
Clare Water Supply, Mlc
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN
Naval Industrial Reserve
  Ordnance Plant, MN
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, Ml
Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis
  Park), MN
Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml
Tri-State Plating, IN
Cimarron Mining, NM
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WYC
Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
  (OU19),CO
Applied Materials, CA
Intel (Santa Clara III), CA
Solvent Service, CAC
Stringfellow, CA
Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA
                                          Higgins Farm, NJ
                                          Butz Landfill, PA
                                          Walsh Landfill, PA
                                          Pickettville Road Landfill, FL
                                          National Presto Industries, Wl
                                          Silver Mountain Mine, WA
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
" ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
^ ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           18

-------
                                       Exhibit  6
                   INDEX  OF SITE  REMEDIES FOR  FY  1990
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL  YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES^    REGION
SITE  NAME.  STATE
NATURAL  ATTENUATION (6)
GROUND WATER  CONTAINMENT
                      Management of Migration
                      in Addition to a Source
                      Control and/or Pump and
                      Treatment Remedy (4)
NO ACTION/NO  FURTHER
ACTION (9)
                                                2
                                                3
                                                4
                                                4
                         2
                         5
                         5
                         5
                                                1
                                                2
                                                2

                                                3
                                                4
                                                5
                                                6
                                                7
                                   Sarney Farm, NY
                                   East Mt. Zion, PA
                                   Arkwood, AR
                                   Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
                                    OKa-c
                                   Faiilield Coal Gasification Plant,
                                    IAC
                                   Mystery Bridge at Highway 20,
                                    WYC
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NYC
Bofors Nobel, Mlc
Clare Water Supply, Mlb-c
Master Disposal Service Landfill,
 Wl
                                   Baird & McGuire, MA
                                   M&T DeLisa Landfill, NJ
                                   Pomona Oaks Well
                                    Contamination, NJ
                                   Westline (Amendment), PA
                                   National Starch & Chemical, NC
                                   Union Scrap Iron Metal, MN
                                   Pagano Salvage, NM
                                   Hastings Groundwater
                                    Contamination (FAR-MAR-
                                    CO), NE
                                   Rocky Mountain Arsenal
                                    (OU22), CO
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
" ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                           19

-------
                                      Exhibit  6

                   INDEX OF  SITE REMEDIES  FOR  FY  1990
                                    (Continued)

FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE    TECHNOLOGIES^    REGION     SITE  NAME. STATE

OTHER ACTIONS (1)

                     Institutional Controls         9        Louisiana-Pacific, CA
 Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
D ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
                                          20

-------
                                     Exhibit  7

         DESCRIPTION  OF  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES  FOR
                SOURCE CONTROL  AND GROUND WATER
 Source  Technologies:

 Treatment technology for source material are grouped based on the primary functions for which
 they are generally used: destruction/detoxification, separation/recovery, immobilization, and
 other. The specific technologies listed are those identified in the RODs.

                   I.    DESTRUCTION/DETOXIFICATION

 A.    Bloremedlatlon

       Biological treatments use microorganisms to degrade primarily low to moderate levels of
       organic contaminants in aqueous waste streams and soil. Biological treatments include:

              *      ln-$Jtu. piprQrnedjptlon - uses natural populations or seeded bacteria to
                     biodegrade organic compounds. The biological process may be
                     accelerated by Introducing nutrients and oxygen. This process is often
                     used in conjunction with a ground water pumping and reinjection system
                     to circulate nutrients and oxygen through a contaminated aquifer and
                     associated contaminated soil.

              •      Solkj/glurry phase BioremQdlfltion - involves commingling excavated
                     organic-contaminated soil and sludge with bioactive microorganisms in a
                     mobile batch reactor or an in-ground reactor.  Waste is mixed with water to
                     create a slurry composition, and the slurry is mixed to maximize treatment
                     of organic contaminants.  Upon completion of the process, the slurry is
                     dewatered and the treated soil is disposed of.

 B.     Chemical  Destruction/Detoxification

       Chemical destruction/detoxification processes alter the hazardous substances to
       produce a by-product residue that is less hazardous than the original waste and may be
       easier to remove from the waste stream.  Chemical destruction/detoxification processes
       include:
                             Reduction/Oxidation fredox) - a destructive process that
                     changes the chemical nature of the nature of the contaminants.

              •       QechJprJna.tJpn • Is a destruction process in which chlorine is chemically
                     removed from chlorinated organic compounds.  This process converts
                     the more toxic compounds into less toxic, more water soluble products.
                     The transformation of contaminants within the soil produces compounds
                     that are more readily removed from the soil.

C.     Thermal  Treatment

       Thermal treatments use heat to destroy or detoxify hazardous substances,
       encompassing such technologies as Incineration, pyrolysis, and wet air oxidation.
       Specific incineration types include rotary Kiln, liquid injection, fluidized-bed, and infrared
       treatment.
                                        21

-------
                                    Exhibit  7

         DESCRIPTION  OF  TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES  FOR
               SOURCE  CONTROL AND  GROUND WATER
                                  (Continued)
              Incineration - is a controlled flame combustion process in which organics are
              destroyed producing carbon dioxide, water, and other compounds.

              Pyrolysis - is a decomposition process in which organics are thermally
              decomposed into their individual elements, in an oxygen deficient atmosphere.

              Wet Air Oxidation - is a process that involves adding high pressure and
              temperature to a water solution or suspension to destroy organics.


                        II.    SEPARATION/RECOVERY

A.     Chemical/Physical  Extraction

       Chemical/Physical Extraction is a transfer/separation process in which contaminants are
       dissociated from the matrix either through a chemical or a physical process and are
       dissolved in a liquid or gaseous phase which may require further treatment.
       Chemical/physical extraction processes  include:

                     In-Situ Soil Flushing - is  an in-situ extraction process that uses a flushing
                     agent, e.g., water to extract contaminants.

                     In-Situ Vacuum/Soil Vapor Extraction - is an in-situ process that involves
                     extraction of VOCs from  soil using a vacuum or forced air. This process is
                     generally used with other technologies since it transfers contaminants
                     from the soil to air and water waste streams.

                     Soil Washing - is a physical/chemical separation technology in which
                     excavated soil is washed with fluids to remove contaminants. Soil
                     washing  is generally followed by other technologies in a treatment train.

B.     Thermal Desorption

       Thermal Desorption uses heat to extract volatile organics from the matrix and may be
       followed by other treatments to collect and/or destroy contaminants.  Thermal desorption
       processes include:

              Ex-Situ Thermal Desorption - is a physical transfer process that uses air, heat, and
              mechanical agitation to change volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soil into a
              gas stream, where the contaminants are then further treated.

              In-situ Stream Stripping/Hot Air Stripping - involves the injection of steam or hot
              air into soil to volatilize VOCs. As VOCs rise to the surface they are condensed or
              trapped on activated carbon.
                                         22

-------
                                    Exhibit  7

         DESCRIPTION  OF  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES  FOR
               SOURCE CONTROL  AND GROUND WATER
                                   (Continued)
                             III.    IMMOBILIZATION

       Immobilization

       The term "immobilization" is used to mean any of the technologies which limit the
       solubility or mobility of contaminants. The term "fixation" has also been used as a
       synonym for immobilization. Technology types which fall within the realm of
       immobilization include:

                     Stabilization - involves the addition and mixing of materials that limit the
                     solubility or mobility of the waste constituents even though the physical
                     characteristics of the waste may not be changed.

                     Solidification/Stabilization - involves the addition and mixing of materials
                     that limit the solubility or mobility of the waste constituents, and results in
                     a monolithic structure.

                     Sorbent Solidification - involves the addition and mixing of materials that
                     limit the mobility of the waste constituents through the action of sorption.


                                   IV.   OTHER

       In-situ Vitrification (ISV) - is a thermochemical treatment process that destroys,
       removes, or immobilizes hazardous wastes by electrically melting the waste media (e.g.,
       soil) which upon cooling creates an extremely stable glass-like solid. ISV can be used to
       treat soil and sludge contaminated with radioactive, inorganic, or organic wastes or
       mixtures of these contaminants.


Ground Water Technologies:

Treatment technologies for ground water are grouped based on the categories commonly used in
the waste water treatment industry:  chemical/physical treatment biological, and other. The
technologies are listed in their order of appearance in Exhibit 5.

                          I.   CHEMICAL/PHYSICAL

                     Air Stripping (Desorption) - is a physical process that involves bringing
                     ground water into close contact with air thereby  causing VOCs in the
                     liquid phase to transfer to the gas phase. For ground water, this generally
                     is accomplished by injecting water into an air stream. Exhaust air may
                     have to be treated (e.g., using carbon adsorption) to remove VOCs
                     before discharge to the atmosphere.
                                        23

-------
                             Exhibit  7

DESCRIPTION  OF  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES  FOR
       SOURCE  CONTROL  AND  GROUND  WATER
                           (Continued)
             Carbon Adsorption - is a physicochemical process that involves using
             activated carbon as a sorbent to remove primarily soluble organics from air
             and water. As contaminated ground water contacts activated carbon,
             organic molecules become physically/chemically attached (i.e.,
             adsorbed) to the carbon surface.  There are two basic types of activated
             carbon: granular and powdered, based on the size of the carbon
             particles.

             Precipitation - is a physicochemical process that involves transforming a
             contaminant from solution into a solid phase.  Precipitation for ground
             water remediation is used primarily for the removal of heavy metals using
             such precipitating chemicals as lime, alum,  or iron salts. Chemical
             precipitation is followed frequently by flocculation to enhance settling of
             solid particles for subsequent removal by filtration or sedimentation.
             Physical precipitation, including cooling, heating or altering the solvent
             concentration, also can be used to alter solubilities and precipitate
             contaminants.

             Granular Activated Carbon - is carbon prepared by heating various types
             of woods and coal to drive off hydrocarbons but with insufficient air to
             sustain combustion. The resulting char is activated by exposure to an
             oxidizing gas at high temperatures.  The carbon particles generally are
             used in carbon adsorption processes (see above).

             Filtration - is a physical process that involves forcing contaminated ground
             water through a porous granular-media filter (e.g., sand, anthracite) to
             remove suspended particles. Several mechanisms are involved in
             filtering suspended particles from the ground water, including straining,
             flocculation, and sedimentation.

             Ion Exchange - is a reversible process whereby toxic ions (i.e., anions
             and cations) in solution are exchanged with less harmful, similarly charged
             ions electrostatically attached to a solid synthetic resin material. The toxic
             ions having a stronger affinity to the  resin, will replace the original ions
             that were placed on the resin before treatment. Once the available
             exchange sites on the resin are filled, the resin can be regenerated.

             Sedimentation - is the removal of suspended solids from wastewaters by
             the gravitational settling of particles heavier than water. Sedimentation
             may be used in ground water treatment after biological treatment or
             precipitation/flocculation to remove biomass or precipitants.

             UV Peroxidation - is a chemical oxidation process that uses hydrogen
             peroxide in the presence of a catalyst to generate hydroxyl radicals that
             react with organics and reduced compounds to yield carbon  dioxide,
             water, salts, simple organic acids, and/or sulfates thereby reducing the
             toxicity and organic content of wastewaters. The application  of ultraviolet
             (UV) light to the waste treatment (photolysis) to enhance/induce chemical
                                 24

-------
                            Exhibit   7

DESCRIPTION  OF  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES  FOR
       SOURCE  CONTROL  AND  GROUND WATER
                           (Continued)
            transformations can be used in conjunction with peroxidation. A major
            advantage of UV application is that specific bonds can be targeted by
            selecting the appropriate frequency of the light source.

            Chemical Treatment - involves chemical reduction-oxidation (redox)
            reactions in which the oxidation state of at least one reactant is raised
            while that of another is lowered. Redox reactions can detoxify and
            enhance biodegradability or adsorption (oxidation), or reduce solubility
            (reduction).

            Flocculation - is a chemical/physical process that involves agitating
            chemically treated water to enhance precipitation and induce
            coagulation.  Fine suspended particles formed during precipitation
            collide during gentle mixing, and agglomerate into larger heavier particles
            or floes and settle out.  Flocculating agents such as alum, lime, iron salts,
            and organic flocculating agents are added to reduce natural repelling
            surface charges on particles, and physical agitation is used for the
            formation of  large floes.

            Activated Alumina - is an adsorption process that is used to remove
            dissolved inorganic constituents such as  arsenic, fluoride, and selenium.
            As contaminated ground water contacts activated alumina, inorganics
            become physically/chemically attached (i.e., adsorbed) to the alumina
            surface. Activated alumina is a highly porous, granular form of aluminum
            oxide.

            Aeration - is a gas-liquid mass-transfer process that is used for adding
            oxygen during biological treatment processes, or for air stripping VOCs
            from wastewaters.

            Neutralization (pH Adjustment) - is a chemical process that involves
            adding an acid (e.g., sulfuric acid) or base (e.g., lime) to adjust the pH.
            Neutralization may be used as a pretreatment before biological or
            chemical treatment.

            Reverse Osmosis - is a physical separation process involving membrane
            filtration. Sufficient pressure is applied to a concentrated solution to
            force the water from the solution to flow through a semi-permeable
            membrane but selectively prevents impurities from passing through the
            membrane; concentrations of impurities build up on the pressure
            induced side of the membrane. Reverse osmosis is generally limited to
            polishing low flow streams  containing highly toxic contaminants,  and is
            especially effective for high molecular weight organics and ions.
                                25

-------
                           Exhibit  7

DESCRIPTION  OF  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES  FOR
       SOURCE CONTROL  AND  GROUND WATER
                          (Continued)
                       II.   BIOLOGICAL

            Biological Treatment (In-Situ Bioremediation) - is an in-situ process that
            uses natural populations or seeded bacteria in an aquifer to transform
            organic contaminants (e.g., petroleum hydrocarbons) into less hazardous
            compounds thereby reducing the concentration ot hazardous
            substances. The biological process generally involves the aerobic
            oxidation of organic compounds by bacteria, which produce water,
            carbon dioxide, and new biomass as products.  In-situ biological
            treatment generally is accomplished via a ground water pump-and-
            reinjection system and is often limited by the ability to provide additional
            oxygen and nutrients to the bacteria.

            Ex-situ Bioremediation - is a batch process that uses bacteria to degrade
            organic matter aerobically or anaerobically.  Aerobic bioremediation
            involves the conversion of organics to carbon dioxide, water, and new
            bacteria cells.  Anaerobic bioremediation generally involves the
            conversion of organics to carbon dioxide and methane gas in the
            absence of molecular oxygen. There are several biological treatment
            processes, including conventional activated sludge systems and fixed
            film systems (e.g., trickling filter, biotower).
                          III.  OTHER

            Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POT\M - encompasses any device or
            system used in the treatment (including recycling and reclamation) of
            municipal or industrial wastes of a liquid nature, that is owned by a State or
            municipality, including sewers, pipes, or other conveyances if they
            convey wastewater to a facility providing treatment.
                                26

-------
                                                 Exhibit 8

                                  RODs SIGNED PER FISCAL YEAR
Number of
   RODs
                      82
84
85      86      87
    Fiscal Year
88
89
90
                           RODs SIGNED PER FISCAL YEAR BY REGION
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1
3
3
7
6
5
11
11
7
1
2
1
13
15
15
22
23
32
1
2
5
10
15
5
26
18
23
1
0
0
5
13
11
12
15
20
0
2
9
20
16
14
25
32
31
0
0
4
5
6
11
21
7
11
0
1
2
1
2
3
12
11
12
0
0
1
2
7
7
4
5
18
0
2
5
3
1
5
13
18
10
0
1
2
3
3
1
7
3
4
4
13
38
69
84
77 •
153b
143C
168d
                                                                      Total RODs 749
    a Contains one ROD Amendment: Picillo Farm, Rl 03/03/87 amends the 09/30/85 ROD.
    b Contains one ROD Amendment: Tyson's Dump, PA 03/31/88 amends the 12/21/84 ROD.
    0 Contains four ROD Amendments- Ordnance Works, WV 09/29/89 amends the 03/31/88 ROD; Chemtronics, NC
     04/26/89 amends the 04/05/88 ROD; Outboard Marine, IL 03/31/89 amends the 05/15/84 ROD; and
     New Brighton/Arden Hills (Well #7), MN 08/11/89 amends the 06/30/86 ROD.
    d Contains seven ROD Amendments: Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving, FL 9/26/90 amends the 9/25/86 ROD,
     Hardage/Criner, OK 11/22/89 amends the 7/14/86 ROD; Hipps Road Landfill, FL 9/21/90 amends the 9/3/86 ROD;
     Operating Industries, CA 9/27/90 amends the 11/16/87 ROD; Pristine, OH 3/30/90 amends the 12/31/87 ROD; Westlme,
     PA 3/30/90 amends the 6/29/88 ROD; Zellwood Groundwater Contamination, FL 03/01/90 amends the 12/17/87 ROD.
                                                   27

-------
                                       Exhibit 9
Number
120


100 1


 80


 60 •
                OCCURRENCES OF SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT
                         TECHNOLOGIES PER FISCAL YEAR
               82
                                                                 100
                        Occurrences of Treatment Technologies
                        Source Control Treatment RODs
                     84
85     86      87
   Fiscal Year
88
89
90
                 OCCURRENCES OF SELECTED SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT
                             TECHNOLOGIES PER FISCAL YEAR •
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
0
0
3
7
12
13
26
30
34
1
0
1
2
9
9
18
18
24
0
0
0
1
0
1
10
17
19
0
0
0
2
4
2
6
4
1
0
0
0
2
2
2
6
6
10
0
0
1
1
3
1
6
10
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
9
16
1
0
5
15
30
32
76
100
109
                                                           Total 368
    a Data reflect occurrences of technologies as selected in source control RODs; more than one remedy may be
      associated with a ROD.
    * Denotes innovative technologies
   ** Contains both innovative and non-innovative technologies.
                                         28

-------
                                      Exhibit  10

             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES'
                       SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODs
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY82
       FY83

       FY84
       FY85
TECHNOLOGIES8

Solidification/
Stabilization (1)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (3)
Solidification/
Stabilization (1)

Biodegradation/Land
Application (1)

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (7)
                           Solidification/
                           Stabilization (2)

                           Volatilization/Soil
                           Aeration (2)

                           Soil Washing/
                           Flushing (2)
                           Vacuum/Vapor
                           Extraction (1)
REGION

   3
   5
   5
  10
   2
   2
   2
   5
   6
   6
   8
                              2
                              4

                              1
                              6

                              2
                              10
SITE NAME.  STATE

Bruin Lagoon, PA
Berlin & Farro, Ml
Laskin/Poplar, OH
Western Processing,
  WA*

Bioecology, TX


Old Inger, LA
Bog Creek Farm, NJ
Bridgeport, NJ
Swope Oil, NJ
Acme Solvents, IL
MOTCO, TX
Triangle Chemical, TX
Woodbury Chemical,
 CO

Wide Beach, NY
Davie Landfill, FL

McKin, ME
Triangle Chemical, TX

Goose Farm, NJ
South Tacoma/Well
 12-A, WA

Verona Well Field, Ml
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           29

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                       SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODS
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY85
       FY86
TECHNOLOGIES3

Biodegradation/
Land Application (1)

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (12)
                           Solidification/
                           Stabilization (9)
                           Volatilization/
                           Soil Aeration (4)
REGION      SITE  NAME.  STATE

   5          Byron/Johnson
               Salvage, IL

   1          Baird & McGuire, MA
   2          Hyde Park, NY*
   3          Drake, PA
   3          Westline, PA
   4          Coleman Evans, FL
   5          Mowbray Engineering,
               AL°
   5          Arrowhead Refinery,
               MN
   5          Fields Brook, OHC
   5          LaSalle Electrical, IL
   5          Metamora Landfill, Ml
   5          Spiegelberg  Landfill, Ml
   6          Sikes Disposal Pit, TX

   2          Marathon Battery, NY
   3          Bruin Lagoon,  PA
   4          Mowbray Engineering,
               ALb
   4          Pepper's Steel, FL*
   4          Sapp Battery, FL
   5          Burrows Sanitation, Ml
   5          Fields Brook, OHC
   5          Forest Waste, Ml
   10          Queen City Farms, WA*

   1          Tinkhams Garage, NHb
   2          Caldwell Trucking, NJ
   2          Metaltec/Aerosystems,
               NJ
   4          Hollingsworth
               Solderless, FL
   Enforcement-lead RODs.
   Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
   RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
   ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
   ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
   Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
   ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
   ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           30

-------
                                      Exhibit 10
            SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED  IN  FY 1982-1990 RODs
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE


       FY86
       FY86
       FY87
TECHNOLOGIES8

Biodegradation/
Land Application (3)
Soil Washing/
Flushing (2)

Decontamination (1)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (13)
                           Solidification/
                           Stabilization (9)
REGION      SITE NAME. STATE

   1          Tinkhams Garage, NHb
   3          Leetown Pesticide, WV
   5          Burlington Northern,
               MN*

   1          Tinkhams Garage, NHb
  10          United Chrome, OR

  10          Western Processing
               (Amendment), WA

   1          Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc
   1          Ottati & Goss, NH*-C
   2          Williams Property, NJ
   4          Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*-C
   4          Sodyeco, NC*
   4          Tower Chemical, FL
   5          Laskln/Poplar, OH
   5          Rose Township, Ml
   6          Bayou Bonfouca, LA
   6          Cleve Reber, LA
   6          Gurley Pit, AR*-C
   6          Hardage/Criner, OK*
   6          Sand Springs
               Petrochemical
               Complex, OK

   2          Chemical Control, NJ
   4          Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*-C
   4          Gold Coast, FL*
   4          Independent Nail, SC
   5          Liquid Disposal Landfill,
              Ml
   5          Northern Engraving, Wl*
   6          Gurley Pit, ARC
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                          31

-------
                                       Exhibit  10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES**
                       SELECTED IN FY  1982-1990 RODS
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION
SITE  NAME.  STATE
       FY87
Solidification/
Stabilization (9)
(Continued)
                           Other Treatment
                           Technologies (4)
                           Volatilization/
                           Soil Aeration (2)

                           Soil Washing/
                           Flushing (2)

                           Vacuum Extraction (1)

                           Biodegradation/
                           Land Application (1)
   6
   6
                               1
                               3
                               3
                               1
                               2

                               1
                               4

                               5

                               2
Mid-South, AR
Sand Springs
  Petrochemical
  Complex, OKC

Resolve, MA
Palmerton Zinc, PA*
West Virginia Ordnance
  Works, WV*
Central City/Clear
  Creek, CO

Ottati & Goss, NH*-C
Waldick Aerospace, NJ*

Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc
Palmetto Wood, SC

Seymour, IN*

Renora, Inc., NJ*
       FY88
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (26)
   1
   2
   2
   2
   2

   2
   2
   3
   3
Rose Disposal Pit, MA
Brewster Well Field, NY
Ewan Property, NJ
Lipari Landfill, NJ
Love Canal (10/26/87),
 NY
Reich Farms, NJb
York Oil, NYC
Berk Sand Pits, PA
Delaware  Sand &
 Gravel, DE
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                            32

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES'*
                       SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODS
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY88
TECHNOLOGIES8

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (26)
(Continued)
                           Solidification/
                           Stabilization (18)
BEG ION      SITg  NAME. STATE

   3          Douglassville Disposal,
               PA
   3          Drake Chemical, PA
   3          Fike Chemical, WVb
   3          Ordnance Works
               Disposal, WV*-d
   3          Southern Maryland
               Wood.MD
   3          Wildcat Landfill, DE
   4          Zellwood, FLC
   5          Forest Waste Disposal,
               Ml
   5          Fort Wayne, IN
   5          LaSalle Electrical, IL
   5          Summit National, OH
   6          Brio Refining, TX*
   6          Old Midland Products,
               AR
   7          Minker Stout/Romaine,
               MO
   7          Syntex Verona, MO*
   7          Times Beach, MO
   8          Broderick Wood, CO*

   2          Love Canal (09/26/88),
               NY
   2          Marathon Battery, NY°
   2          York Oil, NYC
   3          Aladdin, PA
   3          Fike Chemical, WV
   4          Chemtronics, NC*-d
   4          Flowood, MS*
   5          Mid-State Disposal, Wl
   5          Velsicol Chemical, IL
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           33

-------
                                      Exhibit 10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
                       SELECTED  IN  FY 1982-1990 RODs
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY88
TECHNOLOGIES8

Solidification/
Stabilization (18)
(Continued)
                           Vacuum/Vapor
                           Extraction (10)
                           Volatilization/Soil
                           Aeration (6)
REGION      SITE NAME. STATE

   6          Bailey Waste Disposal,
               TX*
   6          Industrial Waste Control,
               AR*
   7          Arkansas City Dump, KS
   7          Midwest Manufacturing,
               IA
   9          Selma Pressure
               Treating, CA*
  10          Commencement Bay/
               Nearshore, WA*
  10          Frontier Hard Chrome
               (12/30/87), WA
  10          Gould, OR*
  10          Pacific Hide & Fur, WA*

   1          Groveland Well, MA
   1          Keefe Environmental,
               NH
   3          Bendix Flight Systems,
               PA*-c
   3          Tyson's Dump
               (Amendment), PA*-d
   4          Airco, KY*
   4          Goodrich, B.F., KY*
   6          South Valley (PL-83),
               NM*
   7          Hastings  (09/28/88), NE
   7          Hastings  (09/30/88), NE
   9          Motorola, AZ*

   1          Cannon Engineering,
               MA
   2          Marathon Battery, NYC
   2          Reich Farms, NJb
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           34

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES"
                       SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODS
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY88
       FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8

Volatilization/Soil
Aeration (6)
(continued)
                           Soil Washing/
                           Flushing (6)
                           Biodegradation/
                           Land Application (6)
                           Other Treatment
                           Technologies (4)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (30)
REGION      SITE  NAME.  STATE

   3          Bendix Flight Systems,
               PA*
   4          Wamchem, SC*
   6          Long Prairie, NM

   3          L.A. Clarke & Son, VAC
   4          Zellwood, FL
   5          United Scrap Lead, OH
   5          U.S. Aviex, Ml*
   6          Koppers/Texarkana,
               TX*
   6          South Cavalcade, TX*

   1          Iron Horse Park, MAC
   3          L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
   4          Brown Wood
               Preserving, FL*
   6          Atchison/Santa Fe
               (Clovis), NM*
   6          French Limited, TX
   6          North Cavalcade, TX

   2          GE Wiring, PR*
   5          Pristine, OH
   6          Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX
   7          Fulbright, MO*

   1          Baird & McGuire, MA
   1          Pinette's Salvage Yard,
               MEC
   1          Wells G&H, MAC
   1          W.R. Grace (Acton
               Plant), MA*,C
   2          Bog Creek Farm, NJ
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           35

-------
                                      Exhibit 10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES'
                      SELECTED  IN  FY 1982-1990 RODs
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
RQD  SIGNATURE


       FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (30)
(Continued)
REGION      SITE NAME. STATE

   2          De Rewal Chemical, NJC
   2          FAA Technical Center,
               NJ*-C
   2          Fulton Terminals, NY
   3          Douglassville Disposal,
               PA*

   3          M.W. Manufacturing, PA
   3          Whitmoyer
               Laboratories, PAb
   4          Aberdeen
               Pesticides/Fairway Six,
               NC
   4          American Creosote
               Works, TNC
   4          Celanese (Shelby ^Fiber
               Operations), NC*-C
   4          Newsom Brothers/Old
               Reichhold, MS
   4          Smith's Farm, KYC
   5          Alsco Anaconda, OH*>C
   5          Big D Campground,
               OH*
   5          Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*-c
   5          Cross Brothers Pail
               (Pembroke), ILC
   5          Ionia City Landfill, Ml*
   5          Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
   5          New Brighton/Arden
               Hills TCAAP), MN*
   5          Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
   5          Outboard Marine
               (Amendment),  Lb
   5          Wedzeb Enterprises, IN
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           36

-------
                                      Exhibit 10
            SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED  IN  FY 1982-1990 RODs
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (30)
(Continued)
                           Solidification/
                           Stabilization (18)
REGION      SITE NAME. STATE

   7          Vogel Paint & Wax,
               IA*. b. e
   8          Sand Creek Industrial,
               C0*-c
   8          Woodbury Chemical,
               CO*
  10          Northwest Transformer,
               WA*

   1          Sullivan's Ledge, MA
   1          W.R. Grace (Acton
               Plant), MA -c
   2          De Rewal Chemical, NJC
   2          Marathon Battery, NY^
   3          Craig Farm Drum, PA*
   3          Hebelka Auto Salvage
               Yard, PA
   3          Ordnance Works
               Disposal Areas
               (Amendment), WV*-C
   4          Amnicola Dump, TN
   4          Celanese (Shelby Fiber
               Operations), NC*-C
   4          Kassouf-Kimerling, FL
   4          Smith's Farm, KYC
   5          Auto Ion Chemicals, Ml*
   5          MIDCO1,IN*.C
   5          MIDCO2.IN*
   6          Pesses Chemical, TX
   9          Coast Wood
               Preserving, CA*
   9          Koppers (Oroville
               Plant), CA*-C
   9          Purity Oil Sales, CA
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           37

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                       SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODs
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION
SITE  NAME.  STATE
       FY89
Vacuum/Vapor
Extraction (17)
   1

   1

   1
   2

   5

   5

   5
   5
                                                          7
                                                          8
                                                          9

                                                          9

                                                          9

                                                          9

                                                          9
Kellogg-Deering Well
  Field, CT
South Municipal Water
  Supply Well, NH*
Wells G&H, MAC
FAA Technical Center,
  NJ*-C
Kysor Industrial, Ml

Miami County
  Incinerator, OH
MIDCO1.IN*
Wausau Water Supply
  (9/29/89), Wl
  NE
Hastings Ground Water,
Sand Creek Industrial,
  C0"-c
Fairchild Semiconductor
  (Mt. View), CA*-C  (1st
  Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor
  (Mt. View), CA*-C  (2nd
  Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor
  (S. San Jose), CA*
IBM (San Jose Plant),
  CA*-C
Intel (Mt. View Plant),
  CA*
Litchfield Airport Area,
  AZ*
Raytheon (Mt. View
  Plant), CA*-C
*  Enforcement-lead RODs.
**  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
a  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
D  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
*  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           38

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
            SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODS
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY89
TECHNOLOGIES3

Biodegradatipn/
Land Application (10)
                           Other/Not Specified
                           Treatment Technologies (9)
REGION      SITE NAME. STATE

   3          Ordnance Works
               Disposal Areas
               (Amendment), WV*-C
   3          Whitmoyer
               Laboratories, PAb
   4          American Creosote
               Works, FL
   5          Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*-c
   5          Galesburg/Koppers, IL
   6          Sheridan Disposal
               Services (12/29/88),
               TX*
   7          Vogel Paint & Wax,
               IA*'b'e
   8          Burlington Northern
               (Somers Plant), MT*
   8          Libby Ground Water,
               MT*
   9          Koppers (Oroville
               Plant), CA*-C

   1          Saco Tannery Waste
               Pits, ME
   2          Claremont
               Polychemical, NY
   2          SMS Instruments (Deer
               Park), NY
   3          Havertown PCP, PA
   3          Publicker/Cuyahoga
               Wrecking, PA
   4          American Creosote
               Works, TNC
   5          Alsco Anaconda, OH*-C
   7          Doepke Disposal
               (Holliday), KS*
   7          Findett, MO
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                          39

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
             SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                       SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODs
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8

Soil Washing/
Flushing (6)
                           Solvent Extraction (6)
                           Volatilization/Soil
                           Aeration (4)
REGION

   2
   2

   2

   4

   5

   9


   1
   1
   1

   2
   5

   6

   9
                                                          9

                                                          9
       FY90
Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
SITE  NAME.  STATE

Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
Vineland Chemical, NJC
  (Soil Washing)
Vineland Chemical, NJC
  (Soil Flushing)
Cape Fear Wood
  Preserving, NC
Cross Brothers Pail
  (Pembroke), ILC
Koppers (Oroville
  Plant), CA*-C

Norwood PCBs, MA
O'Connor, ME*
Pinette's Salvage Yard,
  MEC
Ewan Property, NJ
Outboard Marine
  (Amendment), IL
United Creosoting, TX

Fairchild Semiconductor
  (Mt. View), CA*-C  (1st
  Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor
  (Mt. View), CA*-C  (2nd
  Remedial Action)
Intel (Mt. View Plant),
  CA>C
Raytheon (Mt. View
  Plant), CA*-C

Beacon Heights
  Landfill, CT
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           40

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
            SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED  IN  FY  1982-1990  RODs
                                     (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8

Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
(Continued)
REGION
1
2

2

2

2

2
2

3

3

5
5
5
                              5
                              6

                              6

                              6
          SITE NAME.  STATE
          Kearsarge Metallurgical,
                                                                   New Bedford, MAC
                                                                   FAA Technical Center,
                                                                    NJ
                                                                   Hooker 102nd Street,
                                                                    NY
                                                                   Hooker Chemical-Ruco
                                                                    Polymer, NJ
                                                                   Mattiace
                                                                    Petrochemicals, NYb
                                                                   Sayreville Landfill, NJ
                                                                   Sealand Restoration,
                                                                    NY
                                                                   Greenwood Chemical,
                                                                    VAC
                                                                   M.W. Manufacturing,
                                                                    PAC
                                                                   Bofors Nobel, Mlb
                                                                   Fisher Calo Chem, INb
                                                                   Pristine (Amendment),
                                                                    OHC
                                                                   Springfield Township
                                                                    Dump, MNC
                                                                   St. Louis River, MN
                                                                   Hardage/Criner
                                                                    (Amendment), OKC
                                                                   Jacksonville Municipal
                                                                    Landfill, ARC
                                                                   Rogers Road Municipal
                                                                    Landfill, ARC
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                          41

-------
                                     Exhibit  10
            SOURCE  CONTROL TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES**
                      SELECTED IN  FY  1982-1990  RODs
                                    (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE


       FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8

Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
(Continued)
       FY90
Immobilization (24)
REQION     SITE NAME,  STATE

   6         Texarkana Wood
               Preserving, TX
   6         Vertac, AR
   7         FairfiekJ Coal
               Gasification Plant, IA
   7         Hastings Groundwater
               Contamination (East
               Industrial Park), NEC
   7         Missouri Electric Works,
               MO
   7         Shenandoah Stables,
               MO0
   8         Ogden Defense Depot,
               UT
   8         Sand Creek Industrial,
               COP
  10         FMC Yakima Pit, WA

   1         New Bedford, MAC
   2         Roebling Steel, NJC
   3         C&R Battery, VA
   3         Greenwood Chemical,
               VAC
   3         M.W. Manufacturing,
               PAC
   4         62nd Street Dump, FL
   4         Cabot/Koppers, FLC
   4         Coleman-Evans Wood
               Preserving
               (Amendment), FLC
   4         Kassouf-Kimerling
               Battery Disposal, FL
   4         Schuylkill Metal, FL
   4         Yellow Water Road, FL
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                          42

-------
                                     Exhibit 10
            SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED  IN  FY 1982-1990  RODs
                                    (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

       FY90
TECHNOLOGIES3

Immobilization (24)
(Continued)
                          Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (19)
REGION     SITE  NAME.  STATE

   4         Zellwood Groundwater
               Contamination
               (Amendment), FL
   5         Oconomowoc
               Electroplating, Wl
   5         Sangamo/Crab Orchard
               NWR (USDOI), IL
   5         Springfield Township
               Dump, Mlc
   5         Wayne Waste Oil, INC
   6         Jacksonville Municipal
               Landfill, ARC
   6         Rogers Road Municipal
               Landfill, ARC
   7         Hastings Groundwater
               Contamination (East
               Industrial Park), NEC
   7         Shenandoah Stables,
               MO0
   8         Martin Marietta, Denver
               Aerospace, COC
   8         Rocky Mountain Arsenal
               (OU17), CO
   9         J.H. Baxter, CAC
  10         Teledyne Wah Chang
               Albany TWCA), OR

   1         Stamina Mills, Rl
   2         Vestal Water Supply
               1-1, NY
   3         Lord Shope Landfill, PA
   4         Jadco-Hughes, NCC
   4         SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
   5         Fisher Calo Chem, INb
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                         43

-------
                                     Exhibit  10
            SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED IN  FY  1982-1990  RODs
                                    (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE


       FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8

Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (19)
(Continued)
                           Soil Washing (8)
REGION     SITE NAME.  STATE

   5         Hagen Farm, Wl
   5         Pristine (Amendment),
               OHC
   5         Springfield Township
               Dump, Mlc
   5         Wayne Waste Oil, INC
   6         Hardage/Criner
               (Amendment), OKC
   6         Tinker AFB (Soldier
               Creek/Bldg. 3001),
               OK
   7         Lindsay Manufacturing,
               NE
   7         Waverly Groundwater
               Contamination, NE
   8         Martin Marietta, Denver
               Aerospace, COC
   8         Rocky Mountain Arsenal
               (OU18), CO
   9         Intersil, CAC
   9         Solvent Service,  CA
   9         Watkins-Johnson, CA

   2         King of Prussia, NJ
   2         Myers Property, NJC
   4         Cabot/Koppers,  FLC
   4         Coleman-Evans Wood
               Preserving
               (Amendment), FLC
   5         Moss-American Kerr-
               McGee Oil, Wlc
   5         Wayne Waste Oil, INC
   6         Arkwood, AR
   8         Sand Creek Industrial,
               CO0
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                          44

-------
                                      Exhibit  10
            SOURCE  CONTROL TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED IN FY  1982-1990  RODS
                                    (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
BOP  SIGNATURE

       FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8

Thermal Desorption (6)
                           Bioremediation (5)
                          Other/Unspecified
                          Treatment Technologies (5)
REGION     SITE NAME.  STATE

   2         American Thermostat,
              NY
   2         Claremont
               Polychemical, NY
   2         Samey Farm, NYC
   5         Bofors Nobel, Ml
   5         University of Minnesota,
              MN
   8         Martin Marietta, Denver
               Aerospace, COc-f

   4         Cabot/Koppers, FLC
   4         Dubose Oil  Products,
              FL
   5         Moss-American Kerr-
              McGee Oil, Wlc
   5         Onalaska Municipal
              Landfill, Wl
   9         J.H. Baxter,  CAC

   1         Kearsarge, NHC
   2         Mattiace Petrochemical,
              NVb
   2         Radium Chemical, NYC
   2         Roebling Steel, NJC
   2         Sarney Farm, NYC
   2         Solvent Savers, NY
   3         Avtex Fibers, VA
   6         Jacksonville, ARC
   6         Rogers Road Municipal
              Landfill, ARC
   9         Intersil, CAC
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                          45

-------
                                      Exhibit  10

            SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGIES*
                      SELECTED IN FY  1982-1990  RODS
                                    (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIESa

In-Situ Vitrification (4)
                           Dechlorination (2)
                           Soil Flushing (2)
                           Volatilization/
                           Aeration (1)
REGION     SITE NAME,  STATE

   5         Anderson
               Development, Ml
   5         Sangamo/Crab Orchard
               NWR (USDOI), IL
   6         Crystal Chemical, TX
   8         Rocky Mountain Arsenal
               (OU16),CO
   2         Myers Property, NJC
   6         Tenth Street
               Dump/Junkyard, OK

   3         US Titanium, VA
   4         Jadco-Hughes, NCC

   4         Howe Valley Landfill, KY
  Enforcement-lead RODs.
  Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
  RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
  ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
  ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
  Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
  ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
  ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                          46

-------
                                       Exhibit  11

                               FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
               SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
TECHNOLOGIES3

Solidif ication/Stabi lizatio n/
Immobilization (82)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85

     FY86
                                 FY87
                                 FY88
SITE NAME. STATE         REGION

Bruin Lagoon, PA                  3

Bioecology, TX                     6
Wide Beach, NY                    2
Davie Landfill, FL                   4
Marathon Battery, NY                2
Bruin Lagoon, PA                  3
Mowbray Engineering, AL^          4
Pepper's Steel, FL*                 4
Sapp Battery, FL                   4
Burrows Sanitation, Ml               5
Fields Brook, OHC                  5
Forest Waste, Ml      t              5
Queen City Farms, WA*             10
Chemical Control, NJ                2
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*'C              4
Gold Coast, FL*                     4
Independent Nail, SC                4
Liquid Disposal Landfill, M\           5
Northern Engraving, Wl*              5
Gurley Pit, ARC                     6
Mid-South, AR*                     6
Sand Springs Petrochemical          6
  Complex, OKC
Love Canal (09/26/88), NY           2
Marathon Battery, NYC               2
York Oil, NYC                       2
Aladdin, PA                        3
Fike Chemical, WV                  3
Chemtronics,4NC*-d                 4
Flowood, MS*                      4
Mid-State Disposal, Wl               5
Velsicol Chemical, IL     ^           5
Bailey Waste Disposal, TX* ^          6
Industrial Waste Control, AR*          6
Arkansas City Dump, KS              7
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
' ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                            47

-------
                                      Exhibit  11
                              FY  1982-1990  RODS  BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY**
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3

Solidif ication/Stabi lizatio n/
Immobilization (82)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY88
                                 FY89
                                FY90
SITE  NAME.  STATE         REGION

Midwest Manufacturing, IA   ^        7
Selma Pressure Treating, CA*        9
Commencement Bay/              10
  Nearshore, WA*
Frontier Hard Chrome              10
  (12/30/87), WA
Gould, OR*                      10
Pacific Hide & Fur, WA*            10
Sullivan's Ledge, MA               1
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA*>C      1
De Rewal Chemical, NJC             2
Marathon Battery, NY^               2
Craig Farm Drum, PA*               3
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA      3
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas      3
  (Amendment), WV*-C
Amnicola Dump, TN                 4
Celanese (Shelby Fiber             4
  Operations), NC*'C
Kassouf-Kimerling, FL               4
Smith's Farm, KYC     t             4
Auto Ion Chemicals, Ml*             5
MIDCO I, IN*-C                     5
MIDCO II, IN*                       5
Pesses Chemical, TX      ^         6
Coast Wood Preserving, CA*         9
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA*-C       9
Purity Oil Sales, CA                 9
New Bedford, MAC                 1
Roebling Steel, NJ                 2
C&R Battery, VA                   3
Greenwood Chemical,  VAC          3
M.W. Manufacturing, PAC            3
62nd Street Dump, FL               4
Cabot/Koppers, FLC                4
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           48

-------
                                       Exhibit 11
                               FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
               SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
                                      (Continued)
 TECHNOLOGIES3

 Solidification/Stabilization/
 {Immobilization (82)
 (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY90
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
                                 FY85
SITE NAME.  STATE         REGION

Coleman-Evans Wood              4
  Preserving (Amendment), FLC
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery           4
  Disposal, FL
Schuylkill Metal, FL                 4
Yellow Water Road, FL              4
Zellwood Groundwater              4
  Contamination (Amendment), FL
Oconomowoc Electroplating, Wl      5
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
  (USDOI), ILb                     5
Springfield Township Dump, Mlc      5
Wayne Waste Oil,  INC               5
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,       6
  ARC
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,       6
  ARC
Hastings Groundwater              7
  Contamination (East Industrial
  Park), NEC
Shenandoah Stables, MOC          7
Martin Marietta,  Denver              7
  Aerospace, COC
Rocky Mountain Arsenal             8
  (OU17),CO
J.H. Baxter, CAC                   9
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany       10
  (TWCA), OR
Berlin & Farro, M                   4
Laskin/Poplar, OH      ^           5
Western Processing, WA*          10
Bog Creek Farm, NJ                2
Bridgeport, NJ                     2
Swope Oil, NJ                     2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
' ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           49

-------
                                       Exhibit  11
                              FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY85
                                 FY86
                                 FY87
                                FY88
SITE  NAME.  STATE         REGION

Acme Solvents, IL                  5
MOTCO, TX                       6
Triangle Chemical, TX               6
Woodbury Chemical, CO            8
Baird & McGuire, MA                1
Hyde Park, NY*                    2
Drake, PA                        3
Westline, PA                      3
Coleman Evans, FL                 4
Mowbray Engineering, ALb          5
Arrowhead Refinery, MN             5
Fields Brook, OHC                  5
LaSalle Electrical, IL                 5
Metamora Landfill, Ml                5
Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml             5
Sikes Disposal Pit, TX               6
Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc             1
Ottati & Goss, NH*.C                1
Williams Property, NJ                2
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*-C             4
Sodyeco, NC*                     4
Tower Chemical, FL                 4
Laskin/Poplar, OH                  5
Rose Township, Ml                 5
Bayou Bonfouca, LA                6
Cleve Reber, LA                   6
Gurley Pit, AR*>C   ^                6
Hardage/Criner, OK*                6
Sand Springs Petrochemical         6
  Complex, OK
Rose Disposal Pit, MA*              1
Brewster Well Field, NY             2
Ewan Property, NJ                  2
Lipari Landfill, NJ                   2
Love Canal (10/26/87), NY           2
Reich Farms, NJb                  2
York Oil, NYC                      2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           50

-------
                                       Exhibit 11
                              FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
              SOURCE CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
                                      (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY88
                                 FY89
SITE NAME. STATE         REGION

Berk Sand Pits, PA                 3
Delaware Sand & Gravel, DE         3
Douglassville Disposal, PA          3
Drake Chemical, PA                3
Fike Chemical, WVb                3
Ordnance Works Disposal,          3
  WV**d
Southern Maryland Wood, MD       3
Wildcat Landfill, DE                 3
Zellwood, FLC                     4
Forest Waste Disposal, Ml           5
Fort Wayne, IN                    5
LaSalle Electrical,  IL                5
Summit National, pH               5
Brio Refining, TX*                  6
Old Midland Products, AR           6
Minker Stout/Romaine, MO          7
Syntex Verona, MO*               7
Times Beach, MO                  7
Broderick Wood, CO*               8
Baird & McGuire, MA               1
Pinette's Salvage Yard, MEC         1
Wells G&H, MAC                   1
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA*,C      1
Bog Creek Farm, NJ                2
De Rewal Chemical, NJC            2
FAA Technical Center, NJ*>C         2
Fulton Terminals, NY               2
Douglassville Disposal, PA*          3
M.W. Manufacturing, PA            3
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PAb        3
Aberdeen Pesticides/Fairway        4
 Six, NC
American Creosote Works, TNC       4
Celanese (Shelby Fiber             4
  Operations), NC*-C
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
8 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           51

-------
                                       Exhibit  11

                              FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY89
                                 FY90
SITE  NAME.  STATE         REGION

Newsom Brothers/Old              4
  Reichhold, MS
Smith's Farm, KYC   ^              4
Alsco Anaconda, OH*-C             5
Big D Campground, OH*             5
Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*'c              5
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke),      5
  ILC
Ionia City Landfill, Ml*                5
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH               5
New Brighton/Arden Hills            5
  (TCAAP), MN*
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN             5
Outboard Marine (Amendment),      5
  ILb
Wedzeb Enterprises,  IN             5
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA*.b- e          7
Sand Creek Industrial, CO*'C         8
Woodbury Chemical, CO*   ^         8
Northwest Transformer, WA*         9
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT         1
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH          1
New Bedford, MAC                 1
FAA Technical Center, NJ            2
Hooker 102nd Street, NY            2
Hooker Chemical-Ruco              2
  Polymer, NJ
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY         2
Sayreville Landfill, NJ                2
Sealand Restoration, NY             2
Greenwood Chemical, VAC          3
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
s ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           52

-------
                                       Exhibit 11
                              FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
              SOURCE CONTROL  TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
                                      (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3

Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY90
Biodegradation/Land
Application/Bioremediation
(27)
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85
     FY86
                                 FY87
                                 FY88
SITE NAME. STATE         REGION

M.W. Manufacturing, PAC            3
Bofors Nobel, Mlc                   5
Fisher Calo Chem, INb               5
Pristine (Amendment), OHC          5
Springfield Township Dump, Mlc      5
St. Louis River, MN                  5
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),        6
  OKC
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,        6
  ARC
Rogers Road Municipal  Landfill,       6
  ARC
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX      6
Vertac, AR                         6
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,        7
  IA
Hastings Groundwater               7
  Contamination (East Industrial
  Park), NEC
Missouri Electric Works, MO          7
Shenandoah Stables, MOC           7
Ogden Defense Depot,  UT           8
Sand Creek Industrial, COC           8
FMC Yakima Pit, WA               10
Old Inger, LA                      6
Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL          5
Tinkham Garage, NHb               1
Leetown Pesticide, WV             3
Burlington Northern, MN*           5
Renora, Inc., NJ*                   2
Iron Horse Park, MAC               1
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           53

-------
                                       Exhibit 11
                              FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY**
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8

Biodegradation/Land
Application/Bioremediation
(27) (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
RQD  SIGNATURE

     FY88
                                 FY89
                                 FY90
Volatilization/Soil Aeration/
Aeration (19)
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85

     FY86
                                 FY87
SITE  NAME.  STATE         REGION

L.A. Clarke & Son, VA     t        3
Brown Wood Preserving, FL*        4
Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM*      6
French Limited, TX                 6
North Cavalcade, TX                6
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas      3
  (Amendment), WV*-C
Whitmoyer Laboratories,  PAb        3
American Creosote Works,  FL        4
Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*-c              5
Galesburg/Koppers, IL              5
Sheridan Disposal Services          6
  (12/29/88), TX*
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA*-b-e           7
Burlington Northern (Somers         8
  Plant),  MT*
Libby Ground Water, MT*            8
Koppers (Oroville Plant),  CA*-C       9
Cabot/Koppers, FLC                4
Dubose  Oil Products, FL            4
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,      5
  Wlc
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl        5
J.H. Baxter, CAC                   9
McKin, ME                         1
Triangle Chemical, TX                6
Tinkham Garage, NHb                1
Caldwell Trucking, NJ                2
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ            2
Hollingsworth Solderless, FL          4
Ottati & Goss, NH*-C  ^              1
Waldick Aerospace, NJ*              2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
D ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
' ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                            54

-------
                                       Exhibit 11
                               FY  1982-1990  RODs BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY1
                                      (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8

Volatilization/Soil Aeration/
Aeration (19) (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY88
                                 FY89
Soil Washing/Flushing (28)
     FY90

     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85

     FY86

     FY87

     FY88
                                 FY89
SITE NAME. STATE         REGION

Cannon Engineering                1
Marathon Battery, NYC               2
Reich Farms, NvP                   2
Bendix Flight Systems,              3
  PA*
Wamchem, SC*                     4
Long Prarie, MN                    5
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt.          9
  View),CA*-c (1st Remedial
  Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt.          9
  View),CA*-c (2nd Remedial
  Action)
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CA*-C           9
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant),            9
  CA*>C
Howe Valley Landfill, KY             4
Goose Farm, NJ                   2
South Tacoma/Well 12-A, WA       10
Tinkham Garage, NHb               1
United Chrome, OR               10
Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc             1
Palmetto Wood, SC                4
L.A. Clarke & Son, VAC             3
Zellwood, FL                      4
United Scrap Lead, OH             5
U.S. Aviex, Ml*        ^            5
Koppers/Texarkana, TX*            6
South Cavalcade, TX*               6
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY            2
Vineland Chemical, NJC (Soil         2
 Washing)
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                            55

-------
                                      Exhibit  11
                              FY 1982-1990 RODS BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3

Soil Washing/Flushing (28)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY89
                                FY90
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (48)
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85
     FY86
     FY87
     FY88
SITE  NAME.  STATE
REGION
Vineland Chemical, NJC (Soil         2
  Flushing)
Cape Fear Wood Preserving,         4
 NC
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke),      5
  ILC
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA*-C       9
King of  Prussia, NJ                 2
Myers Property, NJC                2
Cabot/Koppers, FLC                4
Coleman-Evans Wood              4
  Preserving (Amendment), FLC      5
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, Wlc
Wayne  Waste Oil, INC               5
Arkwood, AR                      6
Sand Creek Industrial, COC          8
US Titanium, VA                   3
Jadco-Hughes, NCC                4
                                                 Verona Well Field, Ml               5

                                                 Seymour, IN*                      5
                                                 Groveland Well, MA                1
                                                 Keefe Environmental, NH           1
                                                 Bendix Flight Systems, PA*-C        3
                                                 Tyson's Dump (Amendment),        3
                                                   PA*'d
                                                 Airco, KY*                        4
                                                 Goodrich, B.F., KY*                4
                                                 South Valley (PL-83), NM*           6
                                                 Hastings (09/28/88), NE            7
                                                 Hastings (09/30/88), NE            7
                                                 Motorola, AZ*                      9
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           56

-------
                                       Exhibit  11
                               FY  1982-1990  RODs BY
               SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
                                      (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3

Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (48)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY89
                                 FY90
SITE NAME. STATE
REGION
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT       1
South Municipal Water Supply        1
  Well, NH*
Wells G&H, MAC                    1
FAA Technical Center, NJ*>C         2
Kysor Industrial, Ml                  5
Miami County Incinerator, OH         5
MIDCO I, IN*                        5
Wausau Water Supply               5
  (9/29/89), Wl
Hastings Ground Water, NE           7
Sand Creek Industrial, CO*-C         8
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt.          9
  View), CA*'C (1st Remedial
  Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt.          4
  View), CA*'C (2nd Remedial
  Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (S. San       4
  Jose), CA*
IBM (San Jose Plant), CA*-C           9
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CA*4           9
Litchfield Airport Area, AZ*           9
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant),           9
  CA*'C
Stamina Mills, Rl                     1
Vestal Water Supply 1 -1, NY          2
Lord Shope Landfill, PA              3
Jadco-Hughes, NCC                 4
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC               4
Fisher Calo Chem, INb               5
Hagen Farm, Wl                     5
Pristine (Amendment), OHC           5
Springfield Township Dump, Mlc       5
Wayne Waste Oil, INC                5
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OKC    6
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                            57

-------
                                      Exhibit 11
                              FY  1982-1990  RODs  BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL  TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3

Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (48)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR  OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY90
Solvent Extraction (6)
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85
     FY86
     FY87
     FY88
     FY89
In-Situ Vitrification (4)
     FY90

     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85
     FY86
     FY87
     FY88
     FY89
SITE  NAME.  STATE

Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
 3001), OK
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
Waverly Groundwater
 Contamination, NE
Martin Marietta, Denver
 Aerospace, COC
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
 (OU18),CO
Intersil, CAC
Solvent Service, CA
Watkins-Johnson, CA
REGION
                                                                                  7
                                                                                  7

                                                                                  8

                                                                                  8

                                                                                  9
                                                                                  9
                                                                                  9
                                                 Norwood PCBs, MA
                                                 O'Connor, ME*
                                                 Pinette's Salvage Yard, MEC
                                                 Ewan Property, NJ
                                                 Outboard Marine (Amendment),
                                                  IL
                                                 United Creosoting, TX
                                 1
                                 1
                                 1
                                 2
                                 5
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           58

-------
                                      Exhibit  11
                              FY 1982-1990 RODS BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8

In-Situ Vitrification (4)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY90
Dechlorination (2)
Other/Not Specified/
Unspecified Treatment
Technologies (22)
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85
     FY86
     FY87
     FY88
     FY89
     FY90
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85
     FY86
     FY87
                                FY88
                                FY89
SITE  NAME,  STATE

Anderson Development, Ml
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
  (USDOI), IL
Crystal Chemical, TX
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
  (OU16),CO
REGION

    5
    5

    6
    8
                                                 Myers Property, NJC
                                                 Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard,
                                                  OK
Resolve, MA
Palmerton Zinc, PA*
West Virginia Ordnance Works,
 WV*
Central City/Clear Creek, CO
GE Wiring, PR*
Pristine, OH
Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX
Fulbright, MO*
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
Claremont Polychemical, NY
SMS Instruments (Deer Park),
 NY
                                 2
                                 6
    1
    3
    3

    8
    2
    5
    6
    7
    1
    2
    2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           59

-------
                                      Exhibit  11
                              FY 1982-1990 RODs  BY
              SOURCE  CONTROL TREATMENT  TECHNOLOGY*'
                                     (Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8

Other/Not Specified/
Unspecified Treatment
Technologies (22)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD  SIGNATURE

     FY89
                                FY90
Thermal Desorption (6)
     FY82
     FY83
     FY84
     FY85
     FY86
     FY87
     FY88
     FY89
     FY90
SITE  NAME,  STATE

Havertown PCP, PA
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking,
  PA
American Creosote Works, TNC
Alsco Anaconda, OH*-C
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS*
Findett, MO
Kearsarge, NCC
Mattiace Petrochemical, NY*3
Radium Chemical, NYC
Robeling Steel, NJC
Sarney Farm, NYC
Solvent Savers, NY
Avtex Fibers, VA
Jacksonville, ARC
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
  ARC
Intersil, CAC
REGION

    3
    3

    4
    5
    7
    7
    1
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    3
    6
    6
                                                 American Thermostat, NY
                                                 Claremont Polychemical, NY
                                                 Samey Farm, NY
                                                 Bofors Nobel, Mlb-c
                                                 University of Minnesota, MN
                                                 Martin Marietta, Denver
                                                   Aerospace, CO3-0
                                 2
                                 2
                                 2
                                 5
                                 5
                                 8
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
                                           60

-------
                                Exhibit 12

      OVERVIEW OF SOURCE CONTROL RODs WITH TREATMENT
                            FOR FY 1987-1990
     Column 1
FY
87
88
89
90
RODs Signed
77
153
143
168
                               Column 2
                       Data Represent a Subset of Column 1
                          RODs Selecting One or More
                          Treatment Technologies for
                              Source Control
                                  27
                                  69
                                  76
                                  76
     Column 3
                                                   Data Represent a Subset of Column 2
RODs Selecting Innovative
Treatment Technologies lor
    Source Control
                                                             28
                                                             40
                                                             42
OVERVIEW OF SOURCE CONTROL OCCURRENCES WITH TREATMENT
                  TECHNOLOGIES  FOR FY 1987-1990
     Column A
FY
87
88
89
90
Occurrences of
Source Control
50
100
105
125
                               Column B
                      Data Represent a Subset of Column A
                          Occurrences of Treatment
                          Technologies Selected for
                              Source Control
                                  32
                                  76
                                 100
                                 104
     Column C
                                                  Data Represent a Subset of Column B
Occurrences of Innovative
 Treatment Technologies
  for Source Control
                                                             30
                                                             45
                                                             47
                                    61

-------
                                                 Exhibit 13

                                 FY 1982-1990 ROD REMEDY COSTa'b

1982
1983
1984
1985b
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
TOTAL
0-$2M
2
8
18
23
31
25
43
44
47
241
2.1M-S5M
1
2
12
16
14
22
44
23
33
167
5.1 -$10M
1
2
3
11
11
12
31
23
30
124
10.1 - $20M
0
1
3
9
13
6
15
20
24
91
20.1 - $30M
0
0
2
4
6
5
14
7
11
49
30.1M+
0
0
0
3
9
5C
6
19
17
59
Total
RODs
Signed
4
13
38
69
84
77
153
143d
168e
749d,e
  Estimates are based on present worth costs when available
  Data are not available for three sites (Harris Farley, TX and two Westinghouse, IN sites that are confidential).
c Includes a combined remedial cost for the Envirochem, IN and Northside, IN, which are both represented in one ROD.
d Data are not available for seven FY 1989 RODs.
e Data are not available for six FY 1990 Federal Facility RODs
                                                   62

-------
    o
    81
    §
    O

JQ



I
    o uj
>- DC
U. UJ

M
    UJ
    UJ
    tc
                                                                CO -D
                                  63

-------
                                   Exhibit 15

  FY 1990  TREATMENT  TRAIN RODS FOR  SOURCE AND GROUND
                             WATER  CONTROL*
SOURCE  CONTROL  H8)
 1   New Bedford, MA
 2   Myers Property, NJ**
 2   Solvent Savers, NY
 3   Greenwood Chemical, VA
 3   M.W. Manufacturing, PA
 4   Cabot/Koppers, FL
 4   Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving
        (Amendment), FL
 5   Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WP*
 5   Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI),
         IL
5   Springfield Township Dump, Ml
5   Wayne Waste Oil, IN
6   Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR
6   Rogers Road  Municipal Landfill, AR
7   Hastings Groundwater Contamination
      (East Industrial Park), NE
7   Shenandoah  Stables, MO
8   Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO**
8   Sand Creek Industrial, CO
9   J.H. Baxter, CA
GROUND WATER  (52)
 1   Coakley Landfill, NH                    5
 1   Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH              5
 1   Stamina Mills, Rl                        5
 2   American Thermostat, NY                5
 2   Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
 2   Cinnaminson Groundwater              5
        Contamination, NJ                   5
 2   Claremont Polychemical, NY             5
 2   FAA Technical Center, NJ                5
 2   Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY           5
 2   Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ               6
 2   Myers Property, NJ**                   Q
 2   Solvent Savers, NY
 3   Croydon TCE Spill, PA                  7
 3   Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA          7
 3   Lord Shope Landfill, PA                 7
 3   Osborne Landfill, PA                   7
 3   Raymark, PA                          7
 3   Sand Gravel & Stone, MD                8
 3   US Titanium, VA
 4   62nd Street Dump, FL                  8
 4   City Industries, FL                      8
 4   Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving         8
        (Amendment), FL                   8
 4   Jadco-Hughes, NC                     9
 4   SCRDI Bluff Road, SC                  9
 4   Schuylkill Metal, FL                     9
 5   Fisher CaloChem, IN                  10
 5   K&L Landfill, Ml
    Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN**
    Metamora Landfill, Ml**
    Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, Wl**
    Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant,
      MN
    Oconomowoc Electroplating, Wl
    Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl
    Pristine (Amendment), OH
    Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml**
    Wayne Waste Oil, IN
    Crystal Chemical, TX
    Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.  3001),
      OK
    Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, lA
    Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
    Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
    Missouri Electric Works, MO
    White Farm Equipment Dump, IA
    Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace,
      CO**
    Ogden Defense Depot, UT
    Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO
    Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO
    Silver Bow Creek, MT
    J.H. Baxter, CA
    Solvent Service,  CA
    Stringfellow, CA
    Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA
* Treatment train RODs employ a sequence of treatment technologies to address a specific
  medium or constituent.
"Selected treatment trains for both source and ground water.
                                        64

-------
                                 SECTION II

                    RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
ROD summaries are arranged alphabetically by Region.  The States in each Region
are listed at the beginning of each Region; however, not  all States have had a ROD
signed in FY 1990.

Each ROD  summary presented in this section  consists of the following:

      •     ROD Abstract - summarizing site location and background information,
            contaminated media,  key contaminants,  selected remedial action, and
            present worth or capital costs and O&M costs.

            Performance Standards  or  Goals - describing  qualitative/quantitative
            cleanup criteria.

      •     Institutional Controls - describing  ordered site restrictions.

            Keywords - highlighting treatment technologies, contaminated media, key
            contaminants,  and major keyword categories for  the RODs.   A list of
            RODs by keywords is presented  in the last section of this document.

-------
                       RECORDS OF  DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                       FY1990

                                     CONTENTS
SITE NAME/STATE

Region 1

Baird & McGuire, MA                                                                 73
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT                                                            73
Coakley Landfill, NH                                                                  74
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH                                                            75
New Bedford, MA                                                                    76
Old Springfield Landfill, VT                                                            77
Stamina Mills, RI                                                                      78

Region 2

American Thermostat, NY                                                              79
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ                                                        79
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ                                             80
Claremont Polychemical, NY                                                            81
FAA Technical Center, NJ                                                              82
Forest Glen  Subdivision, NY                                                            82
Glen Ridge  Radium, NJ                                                                83
Higgins Farm, NJ                                                                     84
Hooker-102nd Street, NY                                                               84
Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY                                                    85
Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ                                                   86
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY                                                         87
King of Prussia, NJ                                                                    88
Lone Pine Landfill, NJ                                                                 89
M&T DeLisa Landfill, NJ                                                              89
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ                                                          90
Mattiace Petrochemicals,  NY                                                            91
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ                                                              91
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ                                                      92
Myers Property, NJ                                                                    93
Pomona Oaks Well Contamination, NJ                                                   94
Radium Chemical, NY                                                                 94
Roebling Steel, NJ                                                                     95
Sarney  Farm, NY                                                                      96
Sayreville Landfill, NJ                                                                  96
Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ                                                        97
Sealand Restoration, NY                                                                98
Solvent Savers, NY                                                                    99
Syosset Landfill, NY                                                                  100
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY                                                           100
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ                                                      101
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ                                                     102
                                          67

-------
                      RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                       FY1990

                                    CONTENTS
                                    (Continued)
SITE NAME/STATE                                                           PAGE

Region 3

Army Creek Landfill, DE                                                             103
Avtex Fibers, VA                                                                    103
Brown's Battery Breaking, PA                                                         104
Butz Landfill, PA                                                                    105
C&R Battery, VA                                                                    106
Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE                                                 106
Croydon TCE Spill, PA                                                              107
Cryo-Chem, PA                                                                     108
Dover Air Force Base, DE                                                            109
East Mt. Zion, PA                                                                   109
Fike Chemical, WV                                                                  110
Greenwood Chemical, VA                                                            111
Hranica Landfill, PA                                                                 111
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA                                                       112
Lord Shope Landfill, PA                                                             113
M.W. Manufacturing, PA                                                             114
Osborne Landfill, PA                                                                115
Raymark, PA                                                                       116
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD                                                            117
Tyson Dump #1, PA                                                                 117
US  Titanium, VA                                                                    118
Walsh Landfill, PA                                                                  119
Westline (Amendment), PA                                                           120

Region 4

62nd Street Dump, FL                                                               121
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC                                            121
Cabot/Koppers, FL                                                                  122
City Industries, FL                                                                  123.
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL                                       124
Dubose Oil Products, FL                                                             125
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL                                                          126
Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL                                                 127
Howe Valley Landfill, KY                                                            127
Jadco-Hughes, NC                                                                   128
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL                                                 129
Lewisburg Dump, TN                                                               130
Munisport Landfill, FL                                                              131
National Starch & Chemical, NC                                                       132
North Hollywood Dump, TN                                                         132
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL                                                         133
Schuylkill Metal, FL                                                                 134
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC                                                               135
                                          68

-------
                       RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                       FY1990

                                     CONTENTS
                                     (Continued)
SITE NAME/STATE                                                            PAGE

Region 4 (continued)

Yellow Water Road, FL                                                                135
Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL                                   136

Region 5

Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI                                                         138
Anderson Development, MI                                                            138
Bofors Nobel, MI                                                                     139
Clare Water Supply, MI                                                                140
Fisher Calo Chem, IN                                                                 140
Hagen Farm, WI                                                                      141
Hunts Disposal, WI                                                                   142
Janesville Ash Beds, WI                                                                143
Janesville Old Landfill, WI                                                             143
K&L Landfill, MI                                                                     144
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN                                                         145
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI                                                     146
Metamora Landfill, MI                                                                147
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI                                                     147
National Presto Industries, WI                                                          148
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN                                             149
NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL                                                  150
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI                                                        151
Onalaska Municipal Landfill,  WI                                                        152
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI                                                       153
Pristine (Amendment), OH                                                             154
Reilly Tar &  Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN                                              155
Sangamo/Crab  Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL                                                155
Spiegelberg Landfill, MI                                                                156
Springfield Township Dump,  MI                                                        157
St. Louis River, MN                                                                   158
Tri-State Plating, IN                                                                   158
Union Scrap  Iron Metal, MN                                                            159
University of Minnesota, MN                                                           159
Wayne Waste Oil, IN                                                                  160
Wheeler Pit, WI                                                                      161

Region 6

Arkwood, AR                                                                        163
Cimarron Mining, NM                                                                 164
Crystal Chemical, TX                                                                  164
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK                                                      165
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR                                                      167
                                          69

-------
                      RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                       FY1990

                                     CONTENTS
                                     (Continued)



SITE NAME/STATE                                                           PAGE

Region 6 (continued)

Pagano Salvage, NM                                                                 167
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR                                                   168
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK                                                     169
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX                                                       170
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK                                             170
Vertac, AR                                                                         172

Region 7

Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA                                                    173
Hastings Groundwater Contamination
  (East Industrial Park), NE                                                           174
Hastings Groundwater Contamination (FAR-MAR-CO), NE                                 174
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE                                                           175
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA                                                176
Missouri Electric Works, MO                                                         177
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA                                               178
Shenandoah Stables, MO                                                             178
Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE                                               179
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO                                         180
Wheeling Disposal Service, MO                                                       181
White Farm Equipment Dump, IA                                                     181

Region 8

East Helena, MT                                                                    183
Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO                                                 183
Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT                                                    184
Mystery Bridge at Highway  20, WY                                                   185
Ogden Defense Depot, UT                                                            186
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust  #2 & #3), UT                                              187
Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO                                                         188
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO                                                  189
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO                                                  189
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO                                                  190
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO                                                  191
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO                                                  192
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU22), CO                                                  192
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO                                                  193
Sand Creek Industrial, CO                                                            194
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT                                                    194
Silver Bow Creek, MT                                                               195
Whitewood Creek, SD                                                               196
                                          70

-------
                     RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                     FY1990

                                   CONTENTS
                                   (Continued)
SITE NAME/STATE                                                         PAGE

Region 9

Applied Materials, CA                                                             198
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA                                                        198
Intel  (Santa Clara III), CA                                                          199
Intersil, CA                                                                      200
J.H. Baxter, CA                                                                   200
Louisiana-Pacific, CA                                                              201
Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA                                        202
Solvent Service, CA                                                               202
Stringfellow, CA                                                                  203
Watkins Johnson  (Stewart Division), CA                                               204

Region 10

FMC Yakima Pit, WA                                                              206
Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA                                                      206
Silver Mountain Mine, WA                                                          207
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR                                            208
                                        71

-------
                            RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 1
           (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont)
         BAIRD & MCGUIRE, MA
        Third Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The 20-acre Baird & McGuire site is a former
chemical manufacturing  facility in Holbrook,
Massachusetts.  The South Street wellfield, part
of the municipal water supply for Holbrook, is
located  within  1,500  feet  of the  property.
Bordering on the east of the site, the Cochato
River, which flows down past a sluice gate, is
the major water supply source for the towns of
Holbrook, Randolph, and Braintree.  Products
mixed and stored at the Baird &  McGuire site
included herbicides,  pesticides,  disinfectants,
soaps,  floor waxes,  and   solvents.    Waste
disposal  methods at  the  site included direct
discharge into the  soil,  nearby  brook,  and
wetlands, as well as a former gravel pit (now
covered) in  the eastern portion of the site.  In
1983, EPA conducted a removal action after a
waste  lagoon  overflowed  near  the  Cochato
River and spread contaminants into the river.
A second removal action was initiated  in 1985
when  dioxin   was   discovered  in site  soil.
Between  1985  and  1987,  EPA conducted an
Initial Remedial Measure to construct a new
water  main to  replace   the  main   passing
through the site and to place temporary caps
over some  of  the site.  The 1986 and 1989
Records of  Decision (RODs) addressed all  of
the previous  remedial  activities  at  the  site
including pumping  and onsite  treatment  of
ground   water  (OU1),  as  well  as  onsite
excavation and incineration of contaminated soil
(OU2), and remediation of the sediment of the
Cochato  River  (OU3).  This remedial action
addresses the fourth operable unit, provision of
an alternate  water supply to compensate for the
loss of the South Street wellfield and provide
an additional 0.31 million gallons/day. Since
the previous RODs  have addressed all of the
site-related   contamination,   there  are   no
contaminants of concern associated with this
remedial action.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes future reactivation of the Donna Road
aquifer, by obtaining Federal and  local  permits
to increase  the allowable  capacity  of water
withdrawal;   constructing   a   new   well,
performing pre-design tests  required to obtain
the  permits,  ground  water  filtration  and
disinfection,  and  piping  the  water  to  the
current distribution system.   The  estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$1,188,000, which includes an annual  O&M cost
of $23,000 for 20 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  No Action Remedy; O&M; State
Permit.
    BEACON HEIGHTS LANDFILL, CT
 First Remedial Action - Final (Supplemental)
             September 28, 1990

The 34-acre Beacon Heights Landfill site is on
the northwest corner of an 82-acre property in
Beacon Falls, Connecticut.  From the 1920s to
1970,  a 6-acre area of the site was used as a
dumping and incineration  area.  The site was
subsequently expanded to a 34-acre area where
waste materials including industrial liquids and
chemicals were buried until the State closed the
landfill in 1979.  Industrial wastewater  sludge
also was disposed of onsite. Because of  a slide
of soil and  buried waste in 1972, ground water
and leachate discharge points were created in
the north/northwestern  areas  of  the landfill;
several of these discharge points still persist in
the slide  area.  In 1984, sampling of forty-four
residential  wells  downgradient  of  the  site
revealed  VOC-contaminated  water  in  two
residential wells.  As a result of the sampling,
the State provided bottled drinking  water  to
the affected  residents.    A  1985  Record  of
Decision (ROD) documented remedial activities,
including   consolidation   and   capping   of
contaminated   soil  at   the   six-acre   area;
installation of a leachate collection system; and
extension of a public water supply line to area
residences.   This ROD  supplements  the 1985
ROD  by resolving those  determinations left
open  in the  1985 ROD including the manner
and  locations of leachate  treatment/disposal;
cleanup levels for soil deemed impracticable to
cap in areas contiguous to the landfill; and  the
need  for air  pollution  controls on the landfill
                                              73

-------
gas  vents.    The  primary  contaminants  of
concern affecting the soil, ground water, surface
water, and air are VOCs  including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
supplements the remedial actions documented
in the 1985 ROD and includes off site leachate
treatment at  a wastewater treatment facility
prior to offsite discharge of the treated effluent
to offsite surface  water; offsite incineration of
the sludge generated during leachate treatment;
monitoring of  landfill gases; and providing the
criteria for excavation of the contaminated soil
deemed  impracticable  to  cap.   Although  air
pollution controls are not currently necessary,
the vents to be built into the future cap will be
constructed in such a way as to facilitate the
addition of pollution control devices should
continual  monitoring  reveal  levels  of  air
contaminants  exceeding  Federal  and  State
standards.   The  present  worth cost for this
supplemental remedial action is $2,241,000, with
a present worth O&M cost of $951,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
In order to protect the aquifer underlying the
site  from  further  potential  contamination,
excavation levels for contaminants of concern in
soil  contiguous  to the  area of the  landfill
deemed  impracticable  to  cap are  based  on
leachate  modeling.    In   the  absence  of  a
chemical-specific ARAR, cleanup goals will be
based  on a 10*  excess cancer  risk level  for
carcinogens or a HI=1 for noncarcinogens. Soil
excavation levels  include benzene 0.08 mg/kg,
TCE  0.01 mg/kg,  toluene 100 mg/kg,  and
xylenes 500 mg/kg.   No cleanup levels  for
leachate  were set  because all  but  negligible
amounts of  leachate  will be  removed  and
treated offsite. The treatment  effluent will meet
all  NPDES  permit  requirements  prior  to
discharge to surface water.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Air; Air Monitoring; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact;   Drinking  Water
Contaminants;  Excavation;  Ground  Water;
Leachability   Tests;    Leachate
Collection/Treatment;  MCLGs;  MCLs;  O&M;
Offsite  Discharge; Offsite  Disposal;  Offsite
Treatment; Organics; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
State   Permit;  State  Standards/Regulations;
Surface  Water;  TCE;  Toluene;  Treatment
Technology; Venting; VOCs; Xylenes.
         COAKLEY LANDFILL, NH
           First Remedial Action
               June 28, 1990

The  92-acre  Coakley Landfill  site  is in  the
towns  of  Greenland  and  North  Hampton,
Rockingham County, New Hampshire. The site
includes   a  27-acre   landfill,   and  borders
farmland,   undeveloped   woodlands,   and
wetlands to the north and west and commercial
and residential properties to the east and south.
A drainage bounds the southern and western
sides of  the landfill, channeling surface water
runoff into wetlands north of the landfill.  Sand
and  gravel operations  were conducted  from
1968 to 1972 during which time rock quarrying
and  landfill  operations also  were  conducted.
From  1972  to  1985,  the  landfill  primarily
accepted  refuse from Pease Air  Force Base and
neighboring municipalities  and later accepted
incinerator residue from the refuse-to-energy
plant operated at Pease Air Force Base.  Much
of the  refuse disposed  of at the  landfill was
placed  in open trenches created by the  rock
quarrying and sand and gravel operations.  In
1979, the State  received complaints concerning
leachate  breakouts in  the  area, and by  1983
VOC-contamination had been  identified  in a
domestic  drinking water  well.   Subsequent
testing confirmed VOC-contamination in  the
ground water, and public water was extended
to area  residents  and businesses  who  had
previously received water from private wells.
This Record of Decision (ROD), the first of two
operable  units, addresses source  control and
ground water contamination near the landfill.
A subsequent ROD will address offsite ground
water contamination should  it  be determined
that a contaminated plume underlying wetlands
to the  north of the site requires remediation.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, sediment, and  ground water below the
surface  of the  landfill  are  VOCs including
benzene  and PCE;  other  organics including
phenols;   and  metals  including arsenic  and
chromium.

The  selected remedial  action  for  this  site
includes    excavating   and   consolidating
approximately  2,000 cubic yards  of wetlands
sediment and 30,000 cubic yards of solid waste
and  depositing  the material into the landfill
                                              74

-------
prior to capping; collecting and treating landfill
gases  using  a  thermal  destruction  process;
ground water pumping  and treatment using
chemical precipitation for metals removal,  air
stripping  for  VOC  removal, and biological
treatment, if necessary, prior to  recharge into
the aquifer or discharge to onsite  surface water;
treating  air  from  the  air  stripper  using
incineration or activated carbon filtration prior
to release to the atmosphere; implementing site
access restrictions; and long-term environmental
monitoring including air and  ground water
monitoring.  The estimated present worth cost
for the remedial  action is  $20,200,000, which
includes an  annual O&M cost of $245,000  for
30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels were established to  measure
contaminant levels in the sediment remaining
in the  wetlands following excavation and will
protect the aquifer from potential soil leachate.
Soil cleanup values are based on the  Organic
Leaching  Model  and   incorporates   SDWA
MCLs/MCLGs    and   State    standards.
Chemical-specific  soil  cleanup  goals   include
benzene  0.055 mg/kg, PCE 0.13 mg/kg, and
phenols  2.3  mg/kg.  Ground water  cleanup
goals will meet SDWA  MCLs/MCLGs, State
standards, and  health  advisories and  include
benzene  5 ug/1  (MCL), PCE 3.5 ug/1 (State),
arsenic  50  ug/1  (MCL),  phenols 280 ug/1
(health  advisory),  and  chromium  50 ug/1
(MCL).   In the absence of  a chemical-specific
cleanup standard, cleanup levels will be based
on a  10* excess  cancer  risk level and/or a
Hazard Index = 1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS: Air  Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic; Background Levels; Benzene; Capping;
Carbon  Adsorption  (GAC);    Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium;  Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground
Water    Treatment;   Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;  MCLs;  MCLGs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite  Disposal;  Onsite  Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite  Treatment; Organics; PCE;
Phenols; RCRA;  Safe Drinking Water  Act;
Sediment; Soil;  State  Standards/Regulations;
Treatment Technology; Venting;  VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
   KEARSARGE METALLURGICAL, NH
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The nine-acre Kearsarge Metallurgical site is an
abandoned foundry  in the town of Conway,
Carroll County, New Hampshire.  The site is
located within the 100-year floodplain  of the
Saco River.  Pequawket Pond borders the site
to the south.  The site contains a drainage pipe
with  four  open-bottomed  catch basins,  two
waste piles, a septic  tank and  leach field, and
forested  wetlands.   The  site  was originally
operated  as a saw mill but from 1964 to 1982
was operated as a foundry. Wastes generated
by Kearsarge, the  foundry operator, included
solid  wastes  such  as ceramics  and  metal
grindings, and hazardous substances including
caustic soda, hydrofluoric acid, volatile organic
compounds,  and  flammable  liquids.   These
were disposed of in  the septic system and in
the waste  piles.   In 1979, the  State ordered
Kearsarge to  stop disposing of wastes through
the septic system.  Wastes were subsequently
placed  in  drums   and   stored onsite,  but
Kearsarge removed them in 1982. A hydrologic
study in 1982 revealed contamination of ground
water in  the upper aquifer underlying the site,
a potential  drinking water source. This Record
of  Decision  (ROD)   addresses both   source
control and management of migration  of the
contaminated  ground water   plume.    The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil,  debris,  and  ground  water  are  VOCs
including TCE; and metals including chromium.

The  selected  remedial action  for  the  site
includes removing the septic tank and contents,
followed   by  offsite  incineration  and  ash
disposal  in a RCRA  hazardous waste landfill;
excavating  and dewatering approximately 250
cubic  yards of leach field soil, followed  by
offsite treatment and  disposal; excavating 4,650
cubic yards of waste  pile materials with offsite
disposal of approximately 4,400 cubic yards in
a  RCRA  solid   waste landfill and   offsite
treatment and disposal of  approximately 250
cubic  yards  in  a hazardous   waste  landfill;
ground   water  pumping  and   treatment  by
precipitating  metals,  air stripping to remove
VOCs, using a carbon column  to control  air
emissions from the air stripper, and discharging
treated ground  water to a  publicly  owned
treatment works; and long-term environmental
monitoring. The estimated present worth  cost
for  source  control,  including  O&M,   is
$3,256,000.  The  estimated present worth  cost
                                             75

-------
for management  of migration is $4,020,000,
including  an annual  O&M cost  of  $170,000.
The total  present worth  cost of the remedial
action is $7,276,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup  levels  include  TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL) and chromium 50 ug/1 (National
Interim Primary Drinking  Water Regulation).
For the debris, chromium will be remediated to
the level of 1,400 ug/kg, based on a Hazard
Index  of  1.   Soil  cleanup levels were also
provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:       Air   Stripping;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC);  Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean  Air  Act; Clean  Water Act;
Closure Requirements;  Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water  Monitoring;  Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal    Destruction;    MCLs;
MCLGs;  Metals;  O&M;  Offsite  Discharge;
Offsite  Disposal;  Offsite  Treatment;  Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solvents;  State  Standards/Regulations;  TCE;
VOCs; Wetlands.
           NEW BEDFORD, MA
           First Remedial Action
               April 6, 1990

The New Bedford  site is a harbor area in the
port  city  of  New  Bedford,  Massachusetts,
approximately 55  miles south of Boston.  Two
electrical capacitor manufacturing facilities, the
Aerovox  facility   and  the  Cornell-Dubilier
Electronics facility, are located along the  New
Bedford  Harbor and were major PCB  users
from the 1940s to 1978, when EPA banned the
use of  PCBs.   These  manufacturers  released
PCB-contaminated  wastewater  onto  shoreline
mudflats and  into the harbor.  As a result of
the widespread PCB  contamination,  the  State
closed three fishing areas in the harbor in  1979,
resulting in the loss  of approximately 18,000
acres of productive lobstering ground. Between
1982  and  1985, EPA  and  the Coast Guard
posted warnings notifying the public of fishing
and swimming restrictions.  The site has been
divided into  three study areas which include
the Hot Spot area, the  Acushnet River Estuary,
and  the Lower Harbor  and Upper  Buzzards
Bay.  This Record of Decision (ROD), the first
of two  operable units,  is an  interim remedy
and addresses the 5-acre Hot Spot area, located
along the western bank of the Acushnet River
Estuary adjacent to  the Aerovox facility.  This
first  interim action  operable unit will remove
approximately 48 percent of the total PCB mass
in the sediment from the estuary portion of the
site,   which   is  a  continuing  source  of
contamination throughout the entire  site.  A
subsequent ROD will address  the remediation
of the Acushnet River Estuary and  the Lower
Harbor and Upper Buzzards Bay. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the sediment
in the  New  Bedford  Harbor  are  organics
including PCBs and metals including lead.

The selected interim remedial action for the site
includes dredging   10,000  cubic  yards  of
contaminated   sediment,   dewatering   the
sediment using an  existing confined  disposal
facility  (CDF) and  incinerating the sediment
onsite; solidifying/stabilizing the residual ash
to immobilize metals, if a leaching test indicates
it  is necessary;  treating  effluent  from  the
dewatering  process  using  the best available
control  technology prior to discharge  into the
harbor;  and  passing  exhaust  gases from the
incineration   process  through  air  pollution
control  devices prior  to  their  release  into the
atmosphere.  During the remedial  action the
solidified/stabilized  ash will  be temporarily
stored onsite, and following the completion of
the remedial action, the ash will be stored and
covered  in  a  secondary  cell  of  the CDF.
Ultimate  disposition  of  the  ash   will  be
addressed in the second operable unit.   The
estimated total  cost for  this remedial  action is
$14,379,300.  No O&M costs were specified.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Sediment areas  where PCB   concentrations
exceed  4,000 mg/kg  (based on a cancer  risk
level of 10"6) will be dredged and incinerated.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:    The  Coast
Guard  and  EPA  have  implemented fishing
restrictions to prevent ingestion of contaminated
aquatic  life.

KEYWORDS:  Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Air  Act;  Clean Water  Act;  Direct  Contact;
Dredging;   Floodplain;  Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;  Institutional  Controls;   Interim
Remedy;  Leachability  Tests;  Lead;   Metals;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCBs;   Public  Exposure;  RCRA;  Sediment;
Solidification/Stabilization;    State
                                              76

-------
Standards/Regulations;  Temporary   Storage;
Toxic  Substances  Control  Act;  Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; Water Quality
Criteria; Wetlands.
    OLD  SPRINGFIELD LANDFILL, VT
       Second Remedial Action - Final
             September 29, 1990

The Old Springfield Landfill  site is a  27-acre
inactive   municipal/industrial    landfill
approximately one  mile from the  Springfield
city center in Windsor County, Vermont. Land
use  within  a  one-mile  radius of  the  site
includes  commercial  activities,  low  density
housing,  light  agriculture, and  undeveloped
forest land.  The landfill was operated by the
town  of Springfield between 1947 and 1968,
accepting  industrial  waste and municipal trash.
The site was closed in 1968, and subsequently
sold and developed for use as a mobile home
park.  Municipal water lines were extended to
serve  the  mobile homes. A nearby resident's
complaint about foul-smelling water prompted
an investigation of the site by the State, which
revealed VOC contamination in a  nearby spring
and  the  residential  well.    Because  of  the
VOC-contaminated  water,  the affected  home
near the mobile home park was connected to
the public water supply. Currently the mobile
home  park  is  unoccupied  except   for  the
property owner  who  still resides onsite.   The
site has been divided into two operable units.
Operable  unit one  is documented in a  1988
Record  of Decision (ROD)  which addressed
management of migration of the  contaminated
seeps and ground  water  from  the  site  and
required  that additional  studies  would  be
conducted to determine  the  source control
remedy for the site.  This second operable unit
ROD  documents the  source  control  remedy,
which addresses the risks  associated  with the
inhalation of landfill gases and dermal contact
with and  ingestion  of contaminated  soil.   In
addition,  this   ROD  also   addresses   risks
associated with the  ingestion of  contaminated
ground  water.   The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including benzene,  PCE, TCE,  toluene,
and  xylenes;  and  other  organics  including
PAHs and PCBs.

The  selected  remedial  action   for  this  site
includes  placing   a  multi-layer  cap   over
approximately eight acres (120,000 cubic yards
of contaminated soil) where  waste has been
disposed of or has come to be located or where
the soil cleanup levels are exceeded; collecting
ground and surface water in french drains and
extracting ground water with  source  control
wells  with  treatment,  as  necessary,  in the
treatment system developed  in  operable unit
one or other  equivalent treatment system (not
specified); stabilizing the side  slopes  of the
waste mounds; active gas collecting and  passive
gas  venting  of   landfill gases,  followed  by
treatment using vapor phase carbon adsorption;
operating and maintaining these components;
ground  water   and  air   monitoring;  and
implementing institutional  controls, including
deed restrictions.  The estimated present worth
cost of this remedial action is $8,692,800, which
includes an annual  O&M cost of $123,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Goals   for   soil    cleanup   (i.e.,   areas  of
contamination to be capped) are based on total
carcinogenic  risk  levels of 10s and  include
PCBs 6,000 ug/kg (5 x  lOf* level of risk) and
PAHs  3,000  ug/kg (5  x  10*  level of  risk).
Chemical-specific  ground water treatment goals
are based on SDWA MCLs and State standards
and include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL), xylenes 400 ug/1 (State  standard), and
PCE  5  ug/1 (proposed  MCLs/quantitative
limit).   Because  EPA has determined  that in
this circumstance  it  is technically impracticable,
from an engineering perspective, to  establish a
standard below a practical  quantitative level,
EPA is invoking a waiver from  compliance
with the State standard  for PCE.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions will be imposed on  the  use of the
land, including restricting excavation that might
compromise  the  integrity of the cap, french
drains,  or other remedial features and  on the
use of  ground water.

KEYWORDS:   Air Monitoring; ARAR Waiver;
Benzene; Capping; Carbon  Adsorption  (GAC);
Carcinogenic   Compounds;   Direct  Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground  Water   Monitoring; Ground  Water
Treatment;   Institutional   Controls;   MCLs;
MCLGs; O&M;  Onsite  Containment;  Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil;  Cleanup Standards/Regulations;  TCE;
Toluene; Treatment Technology; Venting; VOCs;
Rural/Residential.
                                             77

-------
           STAMINA MILLS, RI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The  five-acre  Stamina Mills site is a former
textile weaving and finishing facility in North
Smithfield, Providence County,  Rhode Island.
A portion  of  the  site is  within the  100-year
floodplain  and  wetland area  of  the Branch
River. The facility was operated from  the early
1800s to 1975, and was subsequently destroyed
by a fire.   The  manufacturing process used
cleaning  solvents,  acids, bases  and dyes  for
coloring, pesticides  for  moth  proofing,  and
plasticizers to coat fabrics.  Mill process wastes
were landfilled  onsite.   TCE  was  used  to
remove oil and dirt from newly woven fabrics.
In 1969, an  unknown  quantity of TCE  was
spilled  onsite, and  migrated into soil and  the
bedrock  aquifer beneath  the  site with  some
runoff to the Branch River.  EPA initiated three
removal actions from 1984 to 1990, including an
extension of the municipal water supply  to
residents  obtaining  water from the affected
aquifer; and treatment of two underground and
one  above-ground storage  tanks, followed by
offsite disposal. Subsequent investigations have
identified  a   septic   tank   that   may  be
contaminated  with  TCE.    This  Record  of
Decision (ROD)  provides a final remedy, and
addresses both source control and management
of contaminated ground water migration at this
site.   The primary  contaminants of  concern
affecting the soil, debris, sediment, and ground
water are VOCs including TCE  and PCE; other
organics  including   pesticides;  and  metals
including chromium.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes treating VOC-contaminated soil using
vacuum  extraction, followed by treatment of
the extracted  gases using an activated  carbon
filter; excavating approximately 550 cubic yards
of landfill  wastes,  and  sediment  from  the
Branch River  100-year floodplain area; placing
these within the landfill  area  outside of  the
floodplain;   capping   landfill    wastes  and
installing a leachate collection system  to collect
runoff from the landfill; testing, removing, and
disposing of the septic tanks and their contents
offsite;  demolishing  and  removing  partially
standing structures with onsite  disposal of all
earthen debris and disposing of all other solid
wastes offsite; grading and vegetating the  site
after remediation; ground  water  pumping,
pressure   filtration,  and  treatment   using
UV/hydrogen peroxide innovative technology;
discharging the treated ground water to surface
water, subsurface  water onsite,  or existing
sewer line contingent  upon pilot test studies;
surface water  diversion;  long-term monitoring
of   ground    and   surface    waters;   and
implementing  institutional controls  including
deed  restrictions  to   limit  land  use.    The
estimated present worth  cost for this remedial
action is $4316,485, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $164,400.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels that will ensure attainment
of MCLs in  ground  water include TCE  195
ug/kg (MCL) and  PCE  66 ug/kg (Proposed
MCL, PMCL).  Soil levels for chromium were
not  established  since  elevated levels  were
detected  only in landfill wastes that  will be
consolidated   and  capped  as  part of  this
remediation.    Ground water  cleanup levels
include  TCE  5  ug/1  (MCL),  PCE 5  ug/1
(PMCL),   and  chromium 50  ug/1  (National
Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation).
INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions  will be  implemented to regulate
land use and prevent disturbance of remediated
areas at the site.

KEYWORDS:   Capping; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC);  Carcinogenic  Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Air Act; Clean  Water Act; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground  Water
Treatment;  Institutional  Controls;   Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs;  MCLGs; Metals;
O&M;  Offsite  Discharge;  Offsite   Disposal;
Onsite  Discharge; Onsite  Disposal;  Onsite
Treatment;  Organics;  PCE;  Pesticides;  RCRA;
Safe  Drinking  Water   Act;  Sediment;  Soil;
Solvents; State  Standards/Regulations; Surface
Water Monitoring; TCE; Treatability Studies;
Treatment    Technology;   VOCs;   Vacuum
Extraction; Wetlands.
                                              78

-------
                           RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 2
                      (New Jersey, New  York, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands)
      AMERICAN THERMOSTAT, NY
       Second Remedial Action - Final
               June 29, 1990

The 8-acre American Thermostat (AT) site is a
former thermostat assembly facility  in  South
Cairo, Greene County, New York.  Surrounding
land use is agricultural and  light residential.
The  site overlies a shallow  unconsolidated
aquifer and a deeper bedrock aquifer.  From
1954 to 1985, thermostats for small appliances
were assembled using machine oils, lubricants,
and solvents in the process.  Waste chemical
sludge were disposed  of  directly into drains
and dumped onsite for dust control.   In  1981,
after  employees   were  observed   dumping
solvents  onsite,  a  State  investigation   was
conducted, which  revealed a high level of VOC
contamination in  the ground water  near the
site.  As a result, in  1982 AT supplied bottled
water to affected residents and installed carbon
filters on affected wells.   In  1983, an interim
consent order  was  signed  requiring  AT to
cleanup  the site; however,  this was  never
implemented before plant operations  ceased in
1985.    A  1988  Record  of  Decision  (ROD)
provided  for a  permanent  alternate  water
supply for approximately 43  affected  residents.
This final ROD addresses remediation  of all
remaining contaminated media at the  site.  The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil,  sediment,  sludge, debris, ground water,
and surface water are VOCs including PCE and
TCE;  other organics;  and  metals   including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial action   for  this  site
includes  excavating and  treating 6,500 cubic
yards   of   contaminated   soil   using   low
temperature enhanced volatilization;  removing
300 cubic yards of contaminated sediment from
a residential pond and  treating it concurrently
with the soil; backfilling the  treated soil  and
sediment and covering the area with clean soil;
pumping and treatment of ground water using
filtration, air stripping,  and carbon adsorption,
followed by reinjecting treated  water onsite;
decontaminating the AT building; removing 18
waste oil drums,  debris, and less than 5 cubic
yards of drain sludge from  the  building for
offsite treatment and disposal; disposing of all
treatment residuals  offsite;  and  conducting
ground   water  and  air monitoring.      The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $26,102,200, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $1,304,300 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific  goals for  soil  include PCE
1.0 mg/kg and TCE 0.4 mg/kg. Ground water
chemical-specific  cleanup  goals  include PCE
5.0 ug/1,  TCE  5.0 ug/1,  arsenic  25.0 ug/1,
chromium 50 ug/1, and lead 25 ug/1,  all of
which are State MCLs.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not provided.

KEY WORDS:  Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic;   Carbon    Adsorption   (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Closure; Clean
Water   Act;   Chromium;   Debris;
Decontamination;  Direct  Contact;  Dredging;
Drinking  Water   Contaminants;   Excavation;
Ground  Water;  Ground  Water   Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment;  Leachability Tests;
Lead; Metals; O&M;  Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment;   Oils;  Onsite   Discharge;  Onsite
Disposal;  Onsite  Treatment;  Organics;  PCE;
RCRA; Sediment; Sludge;  Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations;  Surface  Water;  TCE;
Treatment    Technology;   VOCs;
Volatilization/Soil  Aeration;  Water  Quality
Criteria.
  CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, NJ
           First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 31-acre Chemical Lean-van Tank Lines site
is a liquid tanker truck terminal and  cleaning
operation   in  Logan  Township,  Gloucester
County, New Jersey.  Surrounding land use is
primarily   rural  residential.    An extensive
wetlands  area  occupies  the  southern  and
eastern  portions of the site.   An underlying
aquifer  was used  as a local drinking water
supply until the  late 1970s when ground water
contaminants including solvents, were  detected
in the aquifer. From 1961 to  1975, wastewater
from  tanker  washing and rinsing operations
was  discharged  into  a  network  of  seven
unlined settling/aeration lagoons, which have
been determined to be the source of the present
                                             79

-------
organic  and inorganic contamination  of soil,
ground water, and adjacent wetlands.  In 1975,
a rinse-water containment system was installed
and the lagoons were no longer  used in the
wastewater process.  In 1977, liquid  remaining
in the lagoons  was drained to the  wetlands,
sludge was removed from settling lagoons, and
these   were  filled   with   clean   soil  and
construction debris.   Aeration lagoons were
filled  with  perimeter diking  materials  and
construction debris, but  the sludge was  not
removed.   In 1982, visible sludge was again
removed from the settling lagoons.  From 1980
to 1981, the State documented onsite and offsite
ground water contamination and consequently,
in 1987, six homes were connected to a public
water supply as part  of a removal action.  A
current removal action will connect  four more
homes to this system.  This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation  of  the  ground
water contaminant plume.  Subsequent RODs
will address source control, surface water, and
sediment   contamination.     The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting ground water
are  VOCs including benzene,  PCE,  and TCE;
other  organics;  and metals including  arsenic,
chromium, and  lead.

The  selected remedial action for  this  site
includes pumping and treatment of  ground
water using chemical  precipitation to  remove
metals, an air  stripper to remove VOCs, and
granular activated carbon to remove residual
organic contaminants;  incinerating fumes from
the air stripper unit onsite; discharging treated
water to onsite  surface water; ground  water
monitoring; and conducting further  studies to
more thoroughly characterize the contamination
and  the  contaminant plume, and  to more
thoroughly define the  design and  operation of
the  treatment system.   The estimated present
worth cost of this remedial action is $5,420,000,
which includes an estimated annual  O&M cost
of $320,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Aquifer cleanup levels will utilize both Federal
and  State  Safe  Drinking Water  Act  MCLs,
which  include  benzene 1 ug/1  (State MCL),
PCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL), TCE 1 ug/I (State
MCL),   arsenic  50 ug/1  (MCL),   chromium
50 ug/1  (State  MCL),  and  lead  15 ug/1
(proposed MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not provided.
KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon   Adsorption   (GAC);   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground
Water;  Ground  Water Monitoring;  Ground
Water   Treatment;   Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCE; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking    Water    Act;    State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs; Wetlands.
     CINNAMINSON GROUNDWATER
          CONTAMINATION, NJ
           First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The   400-acre   Cinnaminson   Groundwater
Contamination  site is  in  the  townships  of
Cinnaminson  and  Delran, Burlington  County,
New  Jersey,  and  is comprised  of a  landfill,
several  industrial  operations, and  residential
properties.   The  site  overlies a deep and  a
shallow aquifer, and the latter is  a potential
source of drinking  water. Furthermore, the site
lies  within  the Delaware  River  floodplain.
Land use  in  the vicinity  of  the  site  is
residential, agricultural, and  industrial.  The
onsite landfill was  originally used for sand and
gravel mining operations.  From 1950 to 1980,
municipal solid waste  and other refuse were
deposited in  the  mining pits,  while mining
operations continued in  other site areas.   In
1970, Sanitary Landfill Inc. (SLI) operated an
onsite sanitary landfill in the same  area, which
accepted hazardous industrial waste.  In 1980,
the State  identified improper waste  disposal
practices onsite, and ordered SLI to close the
landfill.  In  1981  as part of the closure plan,
SLI capped the landfill with 18  inches of clay,
installed a gas  collection and venting system,
and   initiated   ground   water   monitoring.
Subsequent ground water studies by EPA and
SLI   identified    onsite   ground   water
contamination    in   the   landfill   area.
Additionally,    various   onsite   industrial
operations and  local area septic  systems were
also  identified as  potential sources of ground
water contamination.  This Record of Decision
(ROD)   addresses remediation  of  onsite
contaminated ground water in the shallow and
deep aquifers,  and  prevention  of  further
migration of  contamination into  municipal
wells.  The adequacy of the SLI landfill closure
will  be  addressed  in a subsequent ROD.  The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
                                             80

-------
ground  water are  VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other organics
including  PAHs  and phenols;  and  metals
including arsenic, chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  pumping  and  treatment of ground
water from the  shallow  and  deep aquifers
using   chemical  precipitation    and
biological/granular activated carbon; reinjecting
the treated water onsite  into the deep aquifer;
ground  water monitoring; and  implementing
engineering  and  institutional  controls.    The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $20,500,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $751,000 for  30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific  ground water cleanup goals
are based on the  more  stringent  of SDWA
MCLs or  State Standards including benzene
1 ug/1 (State), xylenes  44 ug/1  (State),  and
arsenic 50 ug/1 (State).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls will be implemented at the site.

Keywords:      Arsenic;    Benzene;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC);  Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Chromium;  Direct  Contact; Drinking  Water
Contaminants;  Floodplain;  Ground   Water;
Ground   Water  Monitoring;   Ground  Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; Mining Wastes; O&M; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite  Treatment;  Organic;   PAHs;  PCE;
Phenols;  Safe  Drinking  Water Act;  Solvents;
State  Standards/Regulations;  TCE;  Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Xylenes.
    CLAREMONT POLYCHEMICAL, NY
       Second Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The 9.5-acre Claremont Polychemical site is an
abandoned production facility in Oyster Bay,
Nassau County,  New York.   Land use in the
vicinity  of  the  site  is light industrial and
commercial.  From  1968 to 1980 when onsite
operations  ceased,   Claremont  Polychemical
manufactured inks and  pigments for  plastics,
coated metallic flakes, and vinyl stabilizers in
several onsite buildings, which  had  asbestos
insulation.   The principal wastes  generated
were  organic  solvents, resins,  and  mineral
spirits wash wastes.   In   1979,  the  State
identified  improper  storage  practices onsite,
including stockpiles of over 2,000 uncovered or
leaking drums of  wastes and an  onsite spill
area.   Organic  solvents from several  onsite
spills  and  discharge   incidents  may  have
contaminated onsite soil and ground water.  By
1980, most of the onsite drums were sorted and
removed offsite,  reused, or  burned  onsite.
Subsequently, contaminated soil was excavated
and placed on a plastic  sterile liner, which has
degraded  over   time.     Ground   water
investigations  in 1980 revealed ground water
contamination directly  under the  site.  The
remedial actions for this site have been divided
into two Operable Units (OUs).  This Record of
Decision (ROD)  focuses  on  OU2,  overall
remediation of ground  water and  soil/wastes
contained onsite in drums and holding basins.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil,  debris, and ground  water are VOCs
including PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other
organics; metals including arsenic, chromium,
and lead; and inorganics including asbestos.

The  selected  remedial   action for this  site
includes  excavation  and onsite treatment  of
1,600 cubic yards  of contaminated soil using
low   temperature   enhanced   volatilization,
followed by redeposition of the treated soil in
the  excavated  areas;  decontaminating  the
building,  which  includes   removal,   offsite
disposal,  and   treatment  of  the asbestos
insulation; excavating, treating, and disposing
of  the   underground  tanks,  tank contents,
associated  equipment,   liquid  wastes,  and
contaminated   soil   offsite;   backfilling  the
excavated area with clean soil; and pumping
and  treatment of  ground  water  using  air
stripping, with carbon  adsorption  to  control
offgasses, followed by onsite reinjection of the
treated ground water.   The  estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $16,800,00,
which  includes  an annual  O&M cost  of
$1,100,400 for years 0-10 and $701,900 for years
11-17.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
No  chemical-specific  cleanup  levels  were
provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Asbestos;
Carbon  Adsorption   (GAC);  Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Closure
Requirements; Debris; Decontamination;  Direct
Contact;  Excavation; Ground  Water;  Ground
Water  Treatment;  Inorganics;  Lead;  MCLs;
                                             81

-------
Metals;   O&M;  Offsite   Disposal;   Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics;  PAHs;  PCE;  RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE;   Toluene;   VOCs;   Volatilization/Soil
Aeration; Xylenes.
      FAA TECHNICAL CENTER, NJ
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The 5,000-acre FAA Technical Center  site is 8
miles northwest of Atlantic  City, in  Atlantic
County, New Jersey.  The site is comprised of
several installations including the Atlantic City
International Air Terminal, the Upper Atlantic
City Reservoir, and  the  facilities of the FAA
Technical  Center.  Forested land, commercial,
and  residential areas are  adjacent to  the site.
A salvage yard (Area 2OA), located southeast
of the Atlantic City International Terminal, has
been  used  for  storing  old  aircraft   parts,
automobiles, scrap metal, and empty 55-gallon
drums.   Soil contamination  of  Area  20A by
PCBs and VOCs has resulted from leaking and
deteriorating  drums  that  have been  stored
onsite.   The total volume  of contaminated soil
was  estimated   to  be   930  cubic   yards.
Additionally, onsite ground water has been
contaminated  by VOCs  leaching  out  of the
contaminated  soil and  into  the shallow and
intermediate  aquifers.     A   ground   water
contaminant plume, identified during State site
investigations in 1983, is limited to the shallow
aquifer  below  the  salvage yard area.    This
Record  of Decision (ROD) addresses  soil and
ground  water  contamination.   The  primary
contaminants of concern  affecting the soil and
ground  water are  VOCs including TCE and
toluene;  other  organics  including PCBs; and
metals including chromium.

The selected  remedial  action  for  this site
includes  excavating  930   cubic  yards  of
contaminated soil, temporarily storing the soil
onsite before  transporting the soil off site for
rotary  kiln incineration,  followed  by  offsite
disposal of residual ash;  pumping  and  onsite
treatment of contaminated ground water using
air  stripping  and  emissions  controls,  if
necessary; reinjecting onsite the treated ground
water   from   the   upper   aquifer  (located
upgradient   of   the  contaminated   area);
discharging the treated ground water  from the
intermediate aquifer to an existing borrow pit
area; and  continuing  site  access restrictions.
The  estimated present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial action is $6,300,000, which includes an
annual O&M cost of $86,000 for eight years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific  ground water cleanup levels
are based  on SDWA  MCLs or stricter State
standards,  including 1,1,1-TCA 26 ug/1 (State
MCL), PCBs  0.5 ug/1  (State MCL),  toluene
2,000  ug/1   (SDWA  MCL)  and  chromium
50 ug/1 (SDWA MCL).  Soil cleanup levels are
based  on State action levels  including PCBs
5 mg/kg for  the  0 to  0.5-foot interval  and
25 mg/kg for soil at greater depths.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Chromium; Clean
Air Act; Direct Contact; Excavation;  Ground
Water;    Ground   Water    Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal    Destruction;   MCLs;
Metals; Offsite  Disposal;  Offsite  Treatment;
O&M;  Organics;   Onsite  Discharge;  Onsite
Treatment;  PCBs; Plume Management; RCRA;
Safe   Drinking  Water   Act;   Soil;   State
Standards/Regulations;   TCE;   Temporary
Storage; Toluene; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
     FOREST GLEN SUBDIVISION, NY
            First Remedial Action
             December 29, 1989

The Forest Glen Subdivision site consists of 21
acres of developed residential properties and
undeveloped land  in  Niagara Falls, Niagara
County,   New  York.     Land  in  the  area
surrounding the Forest  Glen subdivision is
used for  residential and industrial purposes,
including a mobile  home park, small shopping
mall, and the CECOS Landfill.  Also, northwest
of the subdivision  is the New Road Landfill,
which is  currently  under investigation  by the
State.  Chemical companies reportedly disposed
of wastes  onsite from the  early 1950s to the
early 1970s.  Evidence of  past waste disposal
became   apparent   in   1973   when  utility
installation workers encountered resinous and
powder-like wastes, drums, and battery casing
parts.   Residents also encountered wastes  on
their  properties and  contacted  the  county,
which responded to complaints regarding drum
tops and  resinous materials in June 1980. Ten
truckloads of a yellow, resin-like material were
subsequently excavated and transported to the
CECOS Landfill by the property owner at the
                                              82

-------
time.   Sampling by EPA's Field Investigation
Team   revealed   the   presence   of   high
concentrations  of  unknown  and  tentatively
identified  compounds (TICs) in August  1987,
and  further soil sampling was conducted to
identify the TICs.  EPA  has executed  interim
measures  to stabilize site conditions including
collecting, staging, and securing drums in areas
north  and   east  of  the  subdivision   and
temporarily covering visibly contaminated soil
with concrete.   This  remedial activity  is the
first  of  two  planned   operable   units  and
addresses   resident   relocation  only.     A
subsequent  operable  unit  will  address the
remediation  of  site  contamination once the
relocation   is   complete.      The   primary
contaminants of concern  affecting the soil are
organics including PAHs; metals including lead;
and other inorganics.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this  site
includes permanently relocating all Forest Glen
subdivision   residents;   sampling   and,   if
necessary,  decontaminating,   salvaging,  or
disposing  of  mobile homes  remaining onsite
after completion of  resident  relocation;  and
implementing site access  restrictions.    The
estimated  present worth cost for this remedial
action  ranges from  $4,710,000 to  $6,020,000,
depending on the  relocation options selected.
No O&M costs are associated with this  first
operable unit.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This  operable  unit  only  addresses  the
permanent   relocation   of   the   residents.
Therefore, no cleanup standards or  goals were
applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not  applicable.

KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact;  Inorganics;  Lead;  Metals; Organics;
PAHs;  Relocation Soil.
        GLEN RIDGE RADIUM, NJ
       Second Remedial Action - Final
                June 1, 1990

The  90-acre  Glen  Ridge  Radium site  is  a
residential community in the Borough of Glen
Ridge, Essex County, New Jersey. The site  is
adjacent  to   another  Superfund  site,  the
Montclair/West Orange site.  The Glen Ridge
site includes  a community of  274 properties
serviced by surface reservoirs in northern New
Jersey. In the early 1900s, a radium processing
or utilization facility was located in the vicinity
of the site.  It is  suspected  that radioactive
waste material  from the facility was disposed
of in then  rural areas within  the community.
Some of the radioactive-contaminated  soil  is
believed to have been moved from the original
disposal  location,  used  as  fill material  in
low-lying areas, or mixed with  Portland cement
to make concrete  sidewalks  or foundations.
Houses were subsequently constructed on  or
near the radium waste disposal areas.  EPA
investigations in 1981 and 1983  confirmed the
presence of gamma radiation contamination  in
the Glen Ridge area  and  in  several  adjacent
houses.    Subsequently,  EPA  established  a
quality air monitoring program to determine
the  levels  of  radon  decay products  in the
contaminated houses.  In 1984,  EPA installed
and  maintained temporary radon  ventilation
systems,  and  gamma radiation  shielding  in
twenty residences. In 1985, the State excavated
contaminated onsite soil from 12  Glen Ridge
properties and disposed of the  soil offsite. This
ROD complements the previous 1989 ROD for
this  site  and provides  a final remedy.   The
primary contaminant  of concern affecting the
soil is radium  **.   The public drinking water
supply was tested and  no contamination was
detected, therefore,  a ground water action was
not implemented at the Glen Ridge site.

The  selected interim  remedial action for this
site  includes   excavating  and  disposing  of
323,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and
other  radium-contaminated   materials  from
residential  and public properties, followed by
disposing   of  the   soil  offsite;  filling  the
excavated areas; environmental monitoring; and
continued treatment technology studies, which
may reduce the volume  of materials disposed
of offsite.   The estimated  present worth cost
for  this    remedial   action   ranges   from
$252,700,000  to $348,700,000,  based   on the
selected transportation method.  There are no
O&M costs associated with this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil  contaminated with concentrations greater
than radon 5.0 pCi/g of soil  to a depth of 6
inches and radon 15 pCi/g in subsurface soil
will be removed and disposed of offsite.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
                                              83

-------
KEYWORDS:  Air Monitoring; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Filling; Offsite Disposal; Radioactive
Materials;  Soil;  State  Standards/Regulations;
Treatability Studies.
           HIGGINS FARM, NJ
           First Remedial Action
             September 24, 1990

The 75-acre Higgins Farm site is a cattle farm
in Franklin Township, Somerset County, New
Jersey. The site is primarily pasture land with
poor  onsite drainage.   Approximately  3,200
residents living within a  three-mile radius of
the site rely on ground water as their drinking
water source.  In 1985, after  receiving  reports
of ground water contamination near the  farm,
the State  investigated the area and found  a
drum burial  area.   In 1986, the  site owner
began to remove the drums from the site, and
ten drums were removed, crushed  and placed
in a  roll-off  container. Later in 1986, another
50 drums were  excavated,  and  during the
excavation, the drums were punctured and
their contents spilled onto the ground.  Fluids
from the pit formed during excavation activities
were subsequently pumped to a holding tank
while excavation  continued.   In  addition to
excavating the drums, visibly  contaminated soil
was placed in roll-off containers. In late 1986,
State  site inspections  revealed ground water
and  soil contamination by VOCs, pesticides,
metals,  and   dioxins.    Bottled   water was
temporarily provided to affected residents until
1989,  when the  State installed  carbon  filter
units on affected wells. In 1987, EPA initiated
stabilization  activities  at the site, including
construction   of    a   barn    to     store
dioxin-contaminated   material   such   as
overpacked  drums  and   roll-off  containers;
draining,  lining,  and   backfilling   of  the
excavation pit; treatment of the pumped liquids
and storage of the treated liquids in a holding
tank; and implementing site access  restrictions.
This Record  of  Decision  (ROD)  provides  a
permanent safe drinking water supply source
for affected residents as part of  an  interim
remedy.     A  future  ROD  will   address
remediation  of final  ground water  and  all
remaining onsite contamination including soil,
sediment, surface  water, and ground  water.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE,  TCE, and  xylenes;  other organics; and
metals including lead.
The  selected interim  remedial  action for this
site  includes  developing,  designing,   and
constructing  a  water  main   extension  and
distribution   system;  installing new  carbon
adsorption units, as necessary; operating and
maintaining existing  carbon adsorption  units
until  construction  is  completed;  conducting
environmental sampling of residential  wells;
removing  carbon  units   and  private  well
connections  once the  permanent water supply
is  installed;  and  implementing institutional
controls   including   ground   water   use
restrictions.  Since the proposed remedy would
not  restore  ground water  to beneficial use
levels,  an  interim  ARAR waiver  will  be
invoked  as part of  this remedial action.  The
total present worth cost for this remedial action
is $1,716,000, which includes a total O&M cost
of $28,200 for 2 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific ARARs for drinking water are
based on SDWA MCLs and the more stringent
State  standards  including benzene  1.0 ug/1
(State MCL), PCE 1.0 ug/1 (State MCL), and
TCE 1.0 ug/1 (State MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Ground water
use restrictions will be implemented to limit
new well installation within the affected area.

KEYWORDS:  Alternate Water Supply; ARAR
Waiver;  Benzene;  Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Carbon   Adsorption  (GAC);  Direct  Contact;
Drinking Water  Contaminants;  Ground Water;
Ground   Water   Monitoring;  Institutional
Controls; Interim Remedy; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M;    Organics;    PCE;   State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs; Xylenes.
       HOOKER - 102nd STREET, NY
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 26, 1990

The 22-acre Hooker - 102nd  Street site  is a
former industrial landfill  in the city of Niagara
Falls, Niagara County, New York.  The site is
adjacent  to, and partially within the Niagara
River's 100-year floodplain.  Surrounding  land
use is industrial and residential. From 1943 to
1970, the site was used by Occidental Chemical
Corporation (formerly  Hooker  Chemicals and
Plastics Corporation) and Olin  Corporation as
a disposal area for at least 159,000 tons of solid
and liquid industrial wastes including benzene,
chlorobenzene and hexachlorocyclohexanes.  In
                                              84

-------
1970,  the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers
ordered   landfilling   operations   to  cease
temporarily  until  a  bulkhead  between  the
landfill  and the  river could  be constructed.
The  bulkhead  was  completed  in  1973,  but
landfill operations were not resumed.  In 1973,
a series of investigations were  conducted by
EPA to characterize site subsurface conditions.
These studies  and the Remedial Investigation
(RI) initiated in 1984, identified  contamination
in  ground  water,   onsite  and  offsite  soil,
rivershore sediment, and  within a storm sewer.
Additionally, the presence of a leachate plume
of non-aqueous phase liquids  (NAPLs)  was
discovered emanating  from the landfill area.
This Record of Decision (ROD) is  the final
remedy,   which   addresses    all    of  the
contaminated    media.       The    primary
contaminants  of  concern  affecting  the  soil,
sediment,   and  ground  water  are  VOCs
including  benzene,  TCE, and toluene; other
organics  including  PCBs and  phenols;  and
metals including arsenic.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes consolidating offsite  soil and lesser
contaminated sediment within  the landfill  area
then capping  the landfill and perimeter  soil;
constructing a slurry  wall around  the  site
perimeter   to   contain  the  NAPL   plume;
extracting   NAPLs   from  the  landfill  and
dredging "hot spot" river sediment, transporting
sediment and  leachate offsite  for incineration;
dredging and  dewatering remaining sediment
and consolidating them within  the landfill area;
recovering ground water with an interception
drain,  followed by  onsite  discharge to  the
Niagara   River  or   offsite   treatment  and
discharge  to a city  sewer; cleaning the storm
sewer, and placing a plastic slipliner within the
sewer;  extracting   and   incinerating  offsite
NAPLs  within consolidated  river  or  sewer
sediment;  long-term ground  water monitoring;
and   implementing   institutional   controls
including  deed and land use  restrictions,  and
site access restrictions  such as  fencing.   The
estimated  present worth cost for this remedial
action is $30,080,000,  which includes an annual
O&M cost of $7,209,600.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Cleanup goals for ground water will be  the
more  stringent  of   Federal  MCLs  or State
regulated  levels.    Chemical-specific   ground
water goals include benzene to detection limits
(State), TCE 5.0 ug/1  (State), PCBs  0.1 ug/1
(State),  phenols 1 ug/1  (State), and  arsenic
25.0 ug/1 (State).  Sediment remedial levels will
be the solid phase concentrations necessary to
potentially exceed State Ambient Water Quality
Standards   in    the    liquid    phase.
Chemical-specific cleanup levels for sediment
include benzene 40 ug/kg, TCE 111 ug/kg, and
PCBs 42.4 ug/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented at  the site.

KEYWORDS:    Arsenic;  Benzene;  Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Direct  Contact;
Dredging;   Excavation;   Floodplain;   Ground
Water;  Ground   Water  Monitoring;   Ground
Water   Treatment;    Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;   Institutional   Controls;   MCLs;
Metals;  O&M;    Offsite    Disposal;    Offsite
Treatment;    Onsite   Containment;    Onsite
Discharge; Onsite  Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCBs;  Phenols; Plume Management;
RCRA;  Safe Drinking  Water Act; Sediment;
Slurry Wall; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
HOOKER CHEMICAL/RUCO POLYMER, NY
           First Remedial Action
             September 28,  1990

The  14-acre Hooker Chemical/Ruco  Polymer
site is an active polymer production facility in
Hicksville,   Nassau   County,  New  York.
Surrounding  land  use is primarily industrial
and  commercial,  and  a residential  area  is
located  near  the site.  Since 1946,  the facility
has produced various plastics, polymers  and
resins,   including   polyvinyl    chloride,
styrene/butadiene  latex, vinyl chloride/vinyl
acetate copolymer, and polyurethanes.  From
1956 to 1975, plant wastewater containing VOCs
and  heavy  metals was discharged  into  six
onsite ground water recharge basins, which has
led to  contamination  of the  onsite ground
water.   From 1946 to 1978, the onsite plant
utilized a heat  transfer  fluid  that contained
PCBs.   Since 1984, site investigations  have
identified    four   onsite   areas   of    PCB
contamination. These include a direct spill  area
where  releases of  heat transfer fluid escaped
through a  relief  valve at the pilot  plant, a
transport area contaminated by PCBs spread
from the direct spill area by onsite truck traffic,
the recharge  basin that was contaminated by
surface runoff, and soil contamination around
an underground  fuel storage tank,  which  was
disposed of offsite in 1989.  Contaminated soil
                                              85

-------
from  the  tank excavation  is currently  stored
onsite.    This  Record  of  Decision   (ROD)
addresses remediation  of  Operable Unit  2
(OU2), the PCB-contaminated soil at  the above
locations.  Remediation of remaining  site areas,
VOC-contaminated soil, and ground water will
be addressed  as OU1  in a subsequent ROD.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and debris are PCBs.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating all soil contaminated with
greater  than 10 mg/kg PCBs from  the direct
spill and transport areas, and the soil from the
recharge basin to a depth of 10 feet;  disposing
of approximately 1,100  cubic yards  of  soil
contaminated with 10 to 500 mg/kg PCBs at an
offsite landfill  along with  the stockpiled  soil
from  the  earlier tank  excavation; treating
approximately   36  cubic   yards  of  soil
contaminated  with  PCB  levels  greater than
500 mg/kg offsite using incineration, followed
by  offsite disposal of the  residual  ash;  and
backfilling and paving  all  excavated  areas,
except for the  recharge basin.  The  estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$995,650.  There are  no O&M costs  associated
with this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
The   excavation  level,  PCBs  greater  than
10 mg/kg, and treatment  level,  PCBs greater
than 500 mg/kg, are based on the TSCA Spill
Cleanup  Policy  and  EPA's  "Guidance  on
Selecting  Remedies for Superfund Sites with
PCB Contamination," respectively.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:      Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Debris;    Direct   Contact;   Excavation;
Incineration/Thermal   Destruction;    Offsite
Disposal;  Offsite Treatment;  Organics; PCBs;
Soil;  Temporary  Storage;  Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatment Technology.
              IMPERIAL OIL/
       CHAMPION CHEMICALS, NJ
            First Remedial Action
             September 26, 1990

The 15-acre Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals
site  is  an  active  oil  blending  facility  in
Marlboro Township, Monmouth County, New
Jersey.   Surrounding land  use is  primarily
residential, and several contaminated wetland
areas are located to the north of the site.  Since
1912, a variety of operations have taken place
onsite, including  food  processing,  chemical
manufacturing,  and   flavor   and   essence
production.   In 1950, the plant was modified
for oil reclamation during which time used oil
was  washed  and  distilled  onsite.   Residual
sludge and  oily filter clay  were  disposed  of
onsite and wash water was discharged  to an
onsite settling lagoon.  Wash water and used
oil were  also reportedly spread on area  roads
to control dust. In 3969 Imperial Oil  began
onsite oil blending operations that  included
mixing and  repacking unused  oil.  Currently,
chemicals  are  delivered   by   truck   and
transferred to  56  onsite above-ground tanks.
The   resulting  oil/water  separator   sludge
reportedly has been disposed of onsite near the
oily  filter clay pile.  Several private and State
investigations  from  1981   to  1990  revealed
contamination in onsite  soil  and ground water,
as well as contamination by oily sludge in two
of the offsite wetland areas.  Probable sources
of the  contamination  include leaching and
erosion of material from an onsite waste pile,
overflowing   of  oil/water  separators,  and
improper treatment of  separator  effluent for
arsenic.    This Record  of Decision  (ROD)
addresses remediation  of  the contaminated
offsite wetland areas.  Remediation of onsite
sources and contaminated ground water will be
addressed in a subsequent ROD.  The primary
contaminants  of concern affecting the soil are
VOCs including benzene, toluene, and xylenes;
other organics including PAHs and PCBs; and
metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.

The  selected remedial  action for  this  site
includes  excavating  approximately  3,700 cubic
yards of  soil from  the offsite wetlands area
contaminated with greater than 1 mg/kg PCBs;
temporarily   storing  the excavated  material
onsite in a dewatering and  staging area before
disposing of  the material offsite in a hazardous
waste landfill; air monitoring and soil sampling;
restoring  the  wetlands after  completion  of
excavation;  and controlling site  access  with
fencing  until remediation has been completed.
A contingency for soil  treatment  has  been
included  if   teachability   studies  determine
treatment is  necessary  to meet land disposal
restrictions.   The estimated  present worth cost
for  this  remedial  action  is  $6,889,985, which
includes an  annual O&M cost  of $1,700  for 10
years.
                                              86

-------
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Cleanup  levels for  soil  have been based on
State Soil Cleanup Objectives and include lead
250-1,000 mg/kg,  PAHs  10 mg/kg and  PCBs
5 mg/kg.   The actual excavation volume of
3,700 cubic yards  of soil has been based on a
PCB level of 1 mg/kg, which is designed to
account for all soil contaminated above Soil
Cleanup  Objectives for  any  contaminant of
concern.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:     Air   Monitoring;   Arsenic;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Contingent Remedy; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Leachability Tests; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Oils; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; RCRA;
Soil; State  Standards/Regulations; Temporary
Storage; Toluene; Toxic Substances Control Act;
VOCs;  Wetlands; Xylenes.
  KENTUCKY AVENUE WELLFIELD, NY
          Second Remedial Action
            September 28, 1990

The  Kentucky  Avenue Wellfield  site is  an
inactive municipal water supply in Horseheads,
Chemung County, New York. The site is in a
low-relief area, part of which  lies within a
100-year  floodplain.   In  addition,  several
wetland areas are onsite. Surrounding land use
is mixed residential, commercial, and industrial.
The site overlies the Newtown Creek Aquifer,
a major  source  of  water  in the area.   The
wellfield  was established in 1962, when a water
supply was needed for a food processing plant.
In 1980, elevated levels of TCE were discovered
in ground water, and the wellfield was closed.
Subsequent onsite investigations by the State
and    EPA    identified   additional   onsite
contamination  by VOCs and metals.   In 1985
and 1986, a removal action by  EPA required
the  connection of 56 homes  that were served
by the wellfield to the public water distribution
system as an alternate  water supply.  A 1986
Record of  Decision  (ROD)  documented  the
selection   of   ground  water   monitoring,
identification of contaminant sources, and  the
provision of  public  water  to  46 additional
residences as part of the remedy for this site.
The primary source  of  this contamination was
determined  to  be  from  the  disposal  of
industrial wastes in lagoons or land areas and
from industrial spills,  including  ones from a
nearby Westinghouse  facility.    This  ROD
addresses management of migration of ground
water contaminants.  A  subsequent ROD will
address source and final  ground water cleanup
activities. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
TCE and xylenes; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this site
includes restoring   the  Kentucky  Avenue
wellfield as  a  public drinking  water supply
well by constructing two treatment plants, one
near the well and  one between the  well and
the adjacent  Westinghouse  facility;  pumping
and treatment of ground water using filtration
to remove inorganics and air stripping/carbon
adsorption or UV-oxidation to remove organics;
disposing  of any treatment residuals offsite;
discharging  the treated  water  to  the  public
water supply, to surface water, or reinjecting
the  treated   water   onsite; ground   water
monitoring;  and investigating  an additional
possible source of onsite contamination.  The
estimated present worth  cost for this  remedial
action is $14,963,900, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $905,300 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Goals for  discharge of  treated  ground  water
were chosen as the most  stringent of Federal or
State MCLs or MCLGs,  or other State ground
water standards.  Chemical-specific goals  for
ground  water  include  TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL),
arsenic  25 ug/1 (State),  chromium  50 ug/1
(MCL), and lead 25  ug/1 (State).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.

KEYWORDS:  Air  Stripping; Arsenic; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act;  Clean Water Act-
Closure Requirements; Direct Contact;  Drinking
Water   Contaminants;   Floodplain;  Ground
Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground
Water   Treatment;   Interim   Remedy;   Lead;
MCLGs; MCLs; Metal; O&M; Offsite Discharge;
Offsite  Disposal; Onsite  Discharge; Onsite
Treatment;  Plume  Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking    Water    Act;   State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;    Treatment
Technology;   VOCs;  Venting; Water  Quality
Criteria; Wetlands; Xylenes.
                                             87

-------
          KING OF PRUSSIA, NJ
           First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  10-acre King of Prussia  (KOP) site is an
abandoned waste disposal and recycling facility
in Winslow Township, Camden County, New
Jersey.   The  nearest  residence is one  mile
northeast  of the site, and the nearest  surface
water body is the Great Egg  Harbor River,
which flows 1,000 feet southwest of the site. In
addition,  an  onsite swale, which  directs  site
runoff toward the river, has been dammed by
two  fire roads resulting in the formation of
onsite wetlands.   Site features include three
man-made, former  lagoons, two  rusting  and
torn tankers on a  concrete pad, and an area
with an undetermined number of buried drums
and  containers.  The  waste  recycling  facility
was  operated  from 1970 to  1974 by the KOP
Corporation.  Past waste handling and disposal
practices at the facility, as well as suspected
illegal  dumping  of  trash  and   hazardous
materials after the facility closed, have resulted
in organic and inorganic contamination of site
soil,  sediment, and ground water.  Soil  and
ground  water  contamination were  detected by
the State in 1976, and  subsequently confirmed
by EPA during site investigations conducted
from 1978 to  1982.   As a result of these
investigations,  buried  plastic containers  and
visibly contaminated soil  west of  the lagoons
were excavated and removed in late 1989 or
1990.   However,  several  additional discrete
areas of  contamination have been  identified
including: metal-contaminated soil adjacent to
the  lagoons,  lagoon sludge, swale  sediment,
and  soil near the  tankers; VOC-contaminated
soil  in  the drum disposal area; organic-  and
metal-contaminated ground water; and possible
contamination  of   the  surface   water   and
sediment in the river.  This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses the first operable  unit for the
site,  including the contaminated ground water,
soil, sediment, sludge, drums and  tankers. A
future ROD  will  address contaminated  soil
associated with the buried  drum area.   The
primary contaminants  of concern affecting the
soil,  sediment,  sludge,  debris, and  ground
water are VOCs including benzene,  PCE,  and
TCE; and metals including chromium and lead.

The   selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating lagoon sludge, soil adjacent
to the  lagoons, and sediment in  the swale,
treating these materials using soil  washing for
metals removal, and redepositing  the residual
materials  in  their  original  location  onsite;
excavating  and  disposing  of buried  drums,
their   contents,   and   associated   visibly
contaminated soil onsite; removing tankers for
offsite  disposal;  ground water pumping  and
treatment  using  air  stripping,  followed  by
reinjection of ground water and offsite disposal
or treatment of residuals; conducting additional
sampling and  analysis of surface  waters  and
sediment of the  Great Egg Harbor River  and
soil in  the buried drums area to determine the
need   for   further   site  remediation;   and
implementing  institutional  controls  including
ground water  use restrictions.  The  estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$14,889,000, which includes an estimated annual
O&M cost of $285,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil  cleanup objectives  are based on a   10*
cancer  risk to human health, an HI less than 1,
or State Action Levels and include chromium
483 mg/kg   (Health-Based    level),   copper
3,571 mg/kg   (Health-Based    level),    lead
500 mg/kg  (State) and nickel  1,935 mg/kg
(Health-Based  level).   Ground water cleanup
levels  are based  on  State and Federal MCLs,
whichever is  more  stringent, including  PCE
1 ug/1 (State MCL),  TCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL),
chromium   50 ug/1    (State   MCL),  copper
1,000 ug/1  (State MCL), and  nickel 210 ug/1
(State MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Ground water
use  restrictions   will  be implemented  until
remediation  goals are achieved.

KEYWORDS:   Air Monitoring; Air  Stripping;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean  Air Act; Clean Closure; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;  Ground
Water;  Ground   Water  Monitoring;  Ground
Water  Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M;  Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Disposal;  Onsite  Treatment;  PCE;   Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Sludge;  Soil; Soil  Washing;  State
Standards/Regulations;   Surface    Water
Monitoring;   TCE;   Treatability   Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.

-------
        LONE PINE LANDFILL, NJ
       Second Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The  45-acre  Lone  Pine Landfill  site is an
abandoned,  privately  owned  waste disposal
facility  in  Freehold  Township,   Monmouth
County, New Jersey.   The site lies within a
semi-wooded  wetlands  area,  and  in   the
Manasquan  River  floodplain.   Contaminated
ground  water  underlies the  site  within  the
surficial Water Table Aquifer and  the deeper
Red  Bank Aquifer.  Ground water from  both
aquifers discharges into the Manasquan River
downgradient from the site.    From  1959 to
1979, municipal,  commercial,  and  industrial
wastes, including approximately 17,000 drums
containing hazardous  waste, tanks containing
liquid chemicals, and containers  of  chemical
sludge, were disposed of onsite.  Following a
chemical fire in 1977 and  an explosion at the
site  in 1978, the  State ordered the owner to
mitigate the  potential environmental damage.
In 1979, when the owner failed  to comply, the
State ordered the landfill closed, and  the site
was  abandoned.  A 1984  Record of Decision
(ROD) addressed Operable Unit One (OU1), the
source  control  remedy,  which   included
constructing  a landfill  containment  system;
capping the  landfill; installing  a slurry  wall
around  the  landfill perimeter;  and collecting
and  treating leachate  from within the slurry
wall containment area.  This ROD addresses
OU2, contaminated ground water outside of the
containment system. The primary contaminants
of concern  affecting  the  ground  water  are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, phenols, TCE,
toluene,  and  xylenes;  and metals including
arsenic,  chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this  site
includes pumping and treating ground water
after installation of an interceptor drain parallel
to the Manasquan River that is  keyed  into the
Water Table  Aquifer to capture contaminated
ground  water;  supplementing  the  drain  with
extraction wells screened within the Red Bank
Aquifer;  constructing  an onsite  wastewater
treatment  plant consisting of an air stripper to
remove   VOCs,   precipitation/filtration   for
removal of metals,  and carbon adsorption to
treat recovered ground water; dewatering and
testing of residual solids to determine proper
method for  offsite disposal;  reinjecting  the
treated  ground water  into  the  Red  Bank
Aquifer or discharging into a recharge trench
onsite;  conducting  long-term   monitoring  of
ground  water,  surface water, river  sediment
and  biota;  and  implementing  institutional
controls including deed restrictions and land
and  ground  water  use   limitations.    The
estimated  present worth cost  for this remedial
action is $10,267,661, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $482,600.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific  ground water cleanup goals
include  benzene  1 ug/1  (State  MCL),  PCE
1 ug/1  (State  MCL),  phenols  0.0035 ug/1
(State),  TCE  1 ug/1   (State   MCL),  toluene
50 ug/1 (State  MCL),  xylenes 44 ug/1  (State
MCL), arsenic 50  ug/I  (State MCL),  chromium
50 ug/1 (State MCL),  and lead 50 ug/1 (State
MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls including land use, ground  water use,
and  deed  restrictions  will be implemented at
the site.

KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon    Adsorption   (GAC);   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium;  Clean  Water Act;
Direct  Contact;  Floodplain;  Ground  Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;   Ground   Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Leachability
Tests;  Lead; MCLs;   Metals; O&M;  Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
PCE; Phenols; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking   Water    Act;    State
Standards/Regulations;   Surface   Water
Monitoring;   TCE;  Toluene;  VOCs;   Water
Quality  Criteria; Wetlands; Xylenes.
       M&T DELISA LANDFILL, NJ
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 20, 1990

The  132-acre  M&T  DeLisa  Landfill  site is
northwest of the city of Asbury Park in Ocean
Township,  New  Jersey.   The 39-acre M&T
DeLisa  landfill  was  operated with  a State
permit from 1914 until 1974.  After the landfill
was  closed, a private company constructed a
shopping mall on 30 acres of the landfill.  The
developer  took  control  measures to  protect
against  the generation of landfill gases  and
leachate. Although landfill gas is generated at
the site and  slightly  elevated levels  of VOC
accumulation were detected  on the northern
edge  of  the  mall,  sampling and  analysis
indicate that  the  landfill  is not the source of
detectable  levels  of VOCs  in the mall.   The
                                             89

-------
developer installed storm  drainage  from the
parking lot to protect Deal Lake Brook, which
is the nearest surface water and is immediately
south of the mall.  Onsite surface water and
ground  water  are not  used  as  sources of
potable water. Site investigations and historical
research onsite activities  revealed no evidence
to  indicate  that  the landfill  was  used for
hazardous  waste  disposal.    There are no
contaminants  of  concern  affecting  the  site,
therefore, this is a no action Record of Decision
(ROD).

The  selected  remedial   action  for  this  site
includes a no further action scenario.  Although
no significant contamination  is present  at the
site,   EPA  recommends   that  environmental
controls be implemented, including continued
surface   and  ground    water  monitoring,
restricting possible future use of onsite ground
water, continued  sampling and monitoring of
the leachate collection system, replacing a gas
vent, sealing cracks in building floors  and walls
in  contact  with  subsurface  soil, improving
detention ponds leading into  Deal Lake Brook,
venting of the north corridor area of the mall,
and   periodic   indoor   and   outdoor  air
monitoring.   EPA  has determined  that such
actions  will  not  be implemented under the
authority  of  the  Superfund  program,  and
responsibility for  the site has been transferred
to  the State.  There are no costs associated with
this no action remedy.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:       EPA
recommends modifying  the property deed to
restrict the possible use of onsite ground water.
KEYWORDS: Institutional Controls; No Action
Remedy.
     MANNHEIM AVENUE DUMP, NJ
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The 2-acre Mannheim Avenue Dump site is a
former  municipally-owned  industrial  waste
landfill in Galloway Township, Atlantic County,
New  Jersey.   Surrounding land use is rural
residential, and many residents and facilities in
the area use ground water as  their  drinking
water supply.  The site is adjacent to a wooded
wetland   area   which   overlies  a  shallow
unconsolidated sand and gravel aquifer and a
deeper aquifer separated from the shallow zone
by a semi-permeable clay layer.  Prior to 1964,
the site was used as a sand and gravel quarry.
Beginning in 1964, drummed industrial wastes,
including   TCE   degreasing   sludge,  leaded
porcelain fragments, and municipal waste were
buried onsite in  35 waste mounds.  In 1982, a
State  survey indicated the presence of many
unburied and  leaking drums onsite.  In 1984,
EPA ordered  a  removal action  that required
cleanup of the  drummed  waste,  including
25,000  pounds   of   degreasing   sludge.
Subsequent  sampling   from  1985  to  1986
reveale-d  ground water contamination onsite.
In 1989, 35 mounds of contaminated soil were
disposed of offsite.  This Record  of Decision
(ROD) addresses ground water contamination
at the site.   The primary  contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including benzene and TCE.

The  selected  remedial action  for this  site
includes ground  water  pumping and treatment
using  air  stripping,   with  pretreatment  for
removal of iron, if necessary; reinjecting  the
ground water  onsite with an evaluation of the
feasibility  of  using infiltration  basins  as an
alternate means  of discharge;  covering  the
disposal  area with clean  fill;  developing a
contingency  plan  for  the  installation  of
individual   carbon  adsorption   units   on
residential  wells, which may become affected
by  migration  of  the contaminant  plume;
monitoring   ground   and   surface   waters;
sampling the sediment; performing a treatability
study  to   investigate  the  need  for  further
treatments   to  remove  toluene,   lead,  and
chromium from ground water; and determining
the need for  off-gas  controls on  air stripper
units.  The  estimated present worth cost for the
remedial action is $4,217,100, which includes an
annual  O&M cost ranging  from  $18,600 to
$394,100 based on differences in  treatment and
monitoring systems over a period of 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific  goals  for  ground  water
include TCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL) and benzene
1 ug/1 (State MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS:
Air   Stripping;  Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Contingent Remedy;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground  Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Offsite
                                              90

-------
Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act;    State    Guidance;   State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Monitoring; TCE; Treatability Studies; VOCs;
Wetlands.
    MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL, NY
            First Remedial Action
             September 27, 1990

The 2-acre Mattiace Petrochemical  site is  an
inactive liquid storage and redistribution facility
in Glen  Cove, Nassau County, New  York.
Surrounding  land  use  is primarily  industrial.
The   site   overlies  a   system   of   three
unconsolidated  sedimentary  aquifers,  which
may be affected by onsite contamination. From
the mid-1960s to  1986, organic solvents were
stored, blended, and repackaged onsite.  Onsite
features involved  with the operation included
a metal Quonset  hut, a concrete fire shed, a
leaching  pond, a  partially  covered concrete
loading dock, and 32  underground  and  24
aboveground storage  tanks.    Drums were
reconditioned    onsite,    and   resulting
water/solvent mixtures were  discharged  to
above-ground tanks  or  to an onsite leaching
pond.  A solvent  water separator was used to
collect overflow from the above-ground tanks
for discharge to the leaching pond.  There is
evidence, however, that overflow  from these
tanks  may  have been discharged directly into
the soil.   In  1988, EPA  characterized and
disposed  of 100,000  gallons  of  hazardous
liquids offsite from  approximately  24  above-
and 32 below-ground storage tanks.  In  1989, a
second investigation identified approximately 25
buried drums and numerous other  containers
that were leaking  contaminated material into
the surrounding soil and ground water.  This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses Operable
Unit  2  (OU2)   and  includes  removal  of
drummed sludge and highly contaminated soil.
A subsequent ROD will address all  remaining
sources of  contamination  including ground
water as OU1.  The primary contaminants of
concern affecting  the soil, sludge, and debris
are VOCs  including  benzene,  PCE,  TCE,
toluene, and  xylenes; other organics including
phenols;   and   metals   including  arsenic,
chromium,  and  lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes excavating all drums, containers, and
highly contaminated soil;  consolidating  the
waste and overpacking drums  as  necessary;
containing contaminated soil, and transporting
the material offsite for  treatment  (possibly
incineration)  and  disposal.   The  estimated
present  worth cost for this remedial action is
$322,300.  There are no O&M costs associated
with this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation;  Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Lead;   Metals;   Offsite   Disposal;   Offsite
Treatment; Organics; PCE; Phenols; Sludge; Soil;
Solvents; TCE; Toluene; VOCs; Xylenes.
      METALTEC/AEROSYSTEMS, NJ
       Second Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The  15.3-acre  Metaltec/Aerosystems site is a
former metal products manufacturing operation
in the Borough of Franklin,  Sussex  County,
New  Jersey.    A  marshy wetlands  area  is
southeast of the site, and surrounding land use
is  primarily   semi-rural  residential.     The
Metaltec plant was operated from 1965 to 1980.
The  area  surrounding the plant  included a
process well,  a wastewater  lagoon,  a  drum
storage area,  soil  saturated  with wastewater,
and two piles of waste material.   In 1980, the
State detected VOCs in the wastewater lagoon,
surrounding soil, and in onsite ground  water.
In    1981,    the    State    ordered
Metaltec/Aerosystems to remove waste material
from the wastewater lagoon,  and in 1982 the
lagoon was partially excavated and filled.   A
1986 Record of Decision (ROD) addressed the
remediation of soil, provided an alternate water
supply for nearby residents,  and required a
supplemental  remedial investigation/feasibility
study to  determine the extent of the ground
water contamination.  This ROD addresses final
ground water remediation at the  site.   The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are  VOCs  including  PCE, TCE,
toluene, and   xylenes; and  metals including
chromium and lead.

The  selected   remedial  action  for  this  site
includes onsite  ground water pumping  and
treatment using precipitation, air  stripping, and
                                             91

-------
carbon adsorption, followed by discharge of the
treated water to onsite surface water; disposing
of precipitated sludge from the ground water
treatment process offsite; regenerating the spent
carbon, and disposing of the  residual offsite;
and ground water monitoring.  The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$4^48,900, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $466300 for 10 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water goals are based
on Federal or State  MCLs and include PCE
1 ug/1 (State MCL),  TCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL),
toluene 2,000 ug/1 (MCL), and xylenes 44 ug/1
(State MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:      Air    Stripping;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air  Act;  Clean  Water Act;
Direct  Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water;   Ground Water   Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M;   Offsite   Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water  Act; State  Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene;  VOCs;  Water   Quality   Criteria;
Wetlands;  Xylenes.
MONTCLAIR/WEST ORANGE RADIUM, NJ
          Second Remedial Action
                June 1, 1990

The  120-acre Montclair/West Orange Radium
site is comprised of 239 residential properties in
the  Town  of Montclair and  127  residential
properties in the Town of West Orange, Essex
County, NJ. The site is located in proximity to
the Glen Ridge Radium Superfund site.  In the
early 1900s, a radium processing or utilization
facility  was located  near  the  site.   It is
suspected  that radioactive waste material from
the facility was disposed  of in then rural areas
within  the   community.     Some  of  the
radioactively-contaminated soil  is believed to
have been moved from  the original  disposal
location, used  as  fill  materials in low-lying
areas, or mixed with Portland cement to make
concrete    sidewalks    or   foundations.
Subsequently, houses were constructed  on or
near the radium waste disposal areas.   EPA
investigations in 1981 and 1983, confirmed the
presence of gamma radiation contamination in
the Glen Ridge  area  and in several  adjacent
houses.  Subsequently, EPA established an air
quality monitoring program to determine the
levels  of  radon   decay  products   in  the
contaminated houses.  In 1984, EPA initiated a
remedial  investigation/feasibility  study  to
determine the nature and extent of the problem
and develop remedial alternatives for the site.
Also  in  1984,  the  Agency  installed  and
maintained   temporary  radon    ventilation
systems,  and  gamma radiation  shielding in
twenty   residences.     In  1985,  the  State
implemented  the pilot study,  which included
excavating and disposing of contaminated soil
offsite  from 12 Glen Ridge site properties and
several properties in Montclair.  A 1989 Record
of Decision (ROD) addressed partial excavation
and offsite disposal of contaminated soil from
a number of residences as the selected remedial
action. This ROD also addresses contaminated
onsite  soil,  and is  a  final  source  control
remedy.   A separate  ground water study has
been  initiated, and  will be addressed in a
subsequent ROD, if necessary.   The primary
contaminants of  concern affecting  the soil are
radioactive materials,  especially  radium  226;
and metals including  lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  excavating   323,000 cubic  yards of
contaminated  soil   (including   Glen  Ridge
Radium  site  soil,  which will be remediated
concurrently)  and disposing of the soil  offsite;
restoring the  excavated areas;  and conducting
environmental  monitoring.    The   estimated
present worth cost  for this remedial action
ranges from $252,700,000 to $348,700,000 for the
Montclair/West   Orange  and   Glen  Ridge
Radium  sites  combined.  No  O&M costs are
associated with this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS   OR  GOALS:
All material contaminated with concentrations
of radon greater than 5.0 pCi/g of soil in the
first 6  inches,  and 15  pCi/g in subsurface soil
will be excavated and removed offsite.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Air Monitoring;  Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Excavation; Lead;
Metals; Offsite Disposal; Radioactive Materials;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations.
                                             92

-------
          MYERS PROPERTY, NJ
           First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  7-acre Myers Property site  is a  former
pesticide and industrial chemical manufacturing
facility  in  Franklin  Township,  Hunterdon
County, New Jersey.  The site lies adjacent to,
and   in  the   100-year   floodplain  of  the
Cakepoulin Creek which  flows to the north of
the site.  The site is comprised of adjourning
private lands,  two acres of wetlands, and  five
acres of  residential  property   with   onsite
residents.  The estimated 250 people who reside
within one mile of the site use the underlying
sole-source aquifer as  their  drinking  water
supply.  From 1928 to 1959, the site was used
intermittently   by   several   companies   to
manufacture pesticides and industrial chemicals.
Improper  handling by  facility   owners  and
operators  of  hazardous  substances including
components used to manufacture  DDT  and its
by-products (e.g.,  PCBs),  and asbestos,  has
resulted in onsite contamination.  In 1978, State
investigations identified 20 unlabeled drums of
chemicals containing metals, DDT, other organic
chemicals  in  a shed,  and  24 cubic  yards of
asbestos material in an onsite warehouse.   In
addition, surface soil and debris were found to
be contaminated with high levels of DDT, other
organics, and metals.  In  1985, EPA performed
the first of two removal actions  at the  site,
which included  repackaging the  deteriorating
drums, solid  DDT, lead compounds, asbestos,
soil,  and debris into  fifty-five gallon  drums
followed by  offsite disposal at a hazardous
waste landfill.   In  1987,  the  second EPA
removal action was performed, which included
implementing   site   access  restrictions   by
installing a  security  fence.   This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses  the  first  of  two
operable units, and includes remediation of the
soil,  sediment, buildings, and shallow ground
water aquifer.   This ROD  also  addresses
interim  remedial  activities  for  the  second
operable unit,  the ground water in the bedrock
aquifer,  which will be  fully addressed in  a
future ROD.    The primary  contaminants of
concern  affecting the soil, sediment, debris,  and
ground  water are VOCs including  benzene;
other organics including  PCBs, PAHs,  dioxin,
and  pesticides  such  as DDT;  and  metals
including arsenic and  lead.

The  selected  remedial   action for  this  site
includes  excavating   48,700  cubic yards  of
organic- and  inorganic-contaminated soil  and
sediment;  treating  the  soil/sediment  using
chemical  dechlorination  to remove  organics
followed   by   soil   washing   to  remove
dechlorination process reagents, soluble reaction
by-products and  metals; onsite  backfilling of
treated  soil; restoring designated wetlands, if
affected  by the  remedy;  shallow  and  deep
ground  water pumping  and  treatment using
ion exchange  and granular activated carbon,
followed by reinjection to the aquifer, or offsite
discharge to Cakepoulin Creek; conducting an
additional study of deep bedrock ground water
to determine the need for subsequent  remedial
actions;  performing ground water  and other
appropriate environmental monitoring;  and
decontaminating onsite buildings with disposal
of contaminated debris offsite.  A contingency
to this  remedial action  is the provision of
point-of-use  treatment  of residential  wells
should   drinking  water   supplies  become
contaminated.  The total present worth cost for
this  remedial  action  is  $45,918,000  which
includes a total O&M cost of $3,053,00  for years
0-5 and  $441,000 for years 6-30.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific  cleanup  goals for  soil  and
sediment are based  on State Soil Action levels
and include total DDT 10 mg/kg, total VOCs
1  mg/kg,   total   carcinogenic   and
noncarcinogenic   PAHs   10 mg/kg,   arsenic
20 mg/kg,   cadmium    3 mg/kg,   copper
170 mg/kg,   and   lead   250-1,000 mg/kg.
Chemical-specific  ground water cleanup goals
for discharge are based on Federal and State
MCLs and State Ground Water Quality Criteria
(GWQC)  and  include benzene  1 ug/1  (State
MCL),   DDT  0.001  (State GWQC),  arsenic
50 ug/1  (Federal  and  State MCL), and lead
50 mg/1 (Federal  and State MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not  applicable.

KEYWORDS:     Arsenic;  Benzene;  Carbon
Adsorption (GAC);  Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act;  Contingent Remedy; Debris;
Decontamination;  Dioxin;  Direct   Contact;
Drinking   Water  Contaminants; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Interim
Remedy;   Leachability  Tests;  Lead;  MCLs;
Metals;   O&M;   Offsite    Discharge;   Offsite
Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite   Treatment;  Organics;  PAHs;  PCBs;
Pesticides;  Plume Management; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Sediment; Soil; Soil
                                             93

-------
Washing/Flushing; Sole-Source Aquifer; State
Standards/Regulations;  Treatability   Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.
             POMONA OAKS
        WELL CONTAMINATION, NJ
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 26, 1990

The 354-acre Pomona Oaks Well Contamination
site is comprised of a 193-residence subdivision
and an  adjacent shopping center  in Galloway
Township, Atlantic County, New  Jersey.  The
site overlies  a surficial  unconsolidated  sand
aquifer.  Home construction at the  site began in
1972,  and private wells within  the  surficial
aquifer were initially used as the water supply.
In 1982, onsite residents complained  of foul
tasting   well    water,    and    subsequent
investigations from 1982 to 1985 confirmed the
presence of onsite ground water contamination.
Possible  contamination  sources   include two
nearby  gas  stations,  a  salvage   yard, a dry
cleaner,  and onsite residential septic tanks.  In
1985,  all homes were hooked to  a municipal
water supply by  the State, eliminating public
exposure to  ground water   contamination.
Further  sampling  conducted from  1986 to 1990
revealed  only   low-level   ground    water
contamination.  This Record of Decision (ROD)
provides a final remedy for the ground water.
Because ground water contaminant levels no
longer exceed health-based  or State standards,
there  are no contaminants of concern at the
site.

The selected remedial action for this site is no
further  action, because  onsite investigations
revealed that the  source of contamination was
a singular event, and that the contamination
dispersed through natural attenuation and/or
biodegradation. Ground water monitoring will
be continued.  No costs are associated with this
no action remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Ground Water  Monitoring; No
Action Remedy.
         RADIUM CHEMICAL, NY
        First Remedial Action - Final
               June 21, 1990

The  Radium  Chemical  site  consists  of  a
one-story   brick   building   in    a   light
industrial/residential  section  in  Woodside,
Queens County,  New  York.   The  Radium
Chemical Company (RCC) produced  luminous
paint beginning in 1913 and later manufactured,
leased, and sold radium226 to hospitals, medical
centers and research laboratories.  The radium
sources were stored onsite in lead containers in
a poured concrete  vault.  In 1983,  the  State
suspended  the  RCC operating  license due to
disposal  and safety infractions and  in  1987
ordered RCC to  remove the radium sources
and   decontaminate  the  building.     RCC
abandoned the  building without complying
leaving a large number of  radium-containing
sealed  devices,  some of  which were suspected
of releasing radium and  radon gas.  Also onsite
were hundreds of containers  of  laboratory
chemicals.  From 1988 to 1989, EPA undertook
a limited emergency removal action  to secure
the facility and  remove the radioactive sources.
In 1989, a Public  Health Advisory was issued
for the site based on the threatened release of
radium226.  This  Record  of Decision (ROD)
supplements the emergency  removal  action by
addressing the  remaining residual radioactive
contamination at  the site including drummed
hazardous  waste  contaminated with radium.
The  primary contaminants of concern affecting
the   soil and  debris are radioactive  materials
including radium226 and  its decay  products,
including radon gas.

The  selected remedial   action for  this  site
includes partial  decontamination and complete
dismantling  of the  contaminated  building,
followed   by offsite  disposal  of  debris  as
appropriate  based on  a contamination level;
excavation and  offsite disposal of contaminated
soil  and  subsurface   piping,   followed  by
replacement  of  piping   and backfilling  with
clean   soil;    and   treatment   of   some
radium-contaminated hazardous waste, followed
by offsite disposal of  treated  and  untreated
radium-contaminated  hazardous  wastes  in
approved facilities.  The  estimated total cost for
this  remedial action is $18,699,000.  O&M costs
are included in the total cost estimate.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
All   soil  will be  excavated   and  disposed of
offsite  that exceeds 5 pCi/g  above background
                                              94

-------
at the  surface  in  the first  six  inches  and
15 pCi/g above background at the subsurface
(i.e,  subsequent 6-inch  layers).     Building
masonry with less than 5 pCi/g radium226 will
be disposed of in a  sanitary landfill,  masonry
exceeding this level and other  material (e.g.,
steel) exceeding specific surface  contamination
levels will be disposed  of offsite along with the
soil  at  a  radioactive  waste  disposal  facility.
Chemical-specific goals for radium-contaminated
hazardous waste were  not specified.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:    Institutional
controls were not specified as  a  component of
the selected  remedy.

KEYWORDS:     Clean  Air   Act;   Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact;  Excavation;
Metals;  Offsite  Disposal;  Offsite  Treatment;
Public  Health  Advisory;  RCRA;  Radioactive
Materials;  Soil;  State  Standards/Regulations;
Treatment Technology.
           ROEBLING STEEL, NJ
            First Remedial Action
               March 29, 1990

The  200-acre Roebling  Steel site is a former
steel wire and  cable manufacturing facility in
the village  of  Roebling,  Florence  Township,
Burlington County, New Jersey.  The site abuts
the Delaware River  to the north and  Crafts
Creek to the east, and lies adjacent to Roebling
Park, a public playground.  From 1906 to 1982,
the facility was operated primarily to produce
steel products, but in recent years, portions of
the site  have  been used  for various other
industrial operations that have resulted  in the
onsite  generation, storage,  or burial of raw
materials  and wastes.   Two  removal actions
were performed as a result of these industrial
operations.  In 1985, the State removed picric
acid and  other explosive chemicals from one
onsite laboratory and detonated  the chemicals
offsite.  From 1987 to  1988, EPA performed a
second  removal  action  which  included  the
offsite  disposal  of  lab pack containers and
drums; recycling/reuse of metallic mercury, gas
cylinders, sulfuric acid, and phosphoric acid;
and onsite containment of baghouse dust and
exposed  asbestos.  This interim  operable unit
will  address those  areas  where contaminant
sources pose a sufficiently imminent hazard to
require  expedited  remediation.   These areas
include  the  remaining  drums  and  exterior
tanks,    transformers   containing
PCB-contaminated oils,  a baghouse  dust  pile,
chemical piles, tires, and  the  soil under the
water  tower in  Roebling Park.   Additional
operable units  will  address  the  remaining
sources of contamination and those areas where
contaminant  migration  has occurred.    The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and debris are organics including acids and
PCBs; metals including arsenic,  chromium, and
lead; and oils.

The  selected interim remedial  action for this
site includes offsite incineration  and disposal at
a RCRA-permitted  facility of the contents  of
757    drums   and    67,000    gallons    of
PCB-contaminated   oil   found   in   183
transformers; dismantling and decontaminating
the  transformers  and  disposing  of   the
transformer  housings  at  a  RCRA-permitted
facility; offsite  disposal at a RCRA-permitted
facility of 150,000 gallons  of tanked material;
offsite   stabilization   and   disposal   at  a
RCRA-permitted facility of 530 cubic yards of
baghouse   dust  and   120 cubic  yards  of
excavated  surface  soil  from  Roebling  Park;
offsite    treatment   and   disposal  at   a
RCRA-regulated landfill  of 40  cubic yards  of
metal-contaminated materials from 79 chemical
piles and offsite  disposal of 10,000  tires. The
estimated total  cost for  this remedial action is
$5,003,400.  No O&M costs are  associated  with
this operable unit.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Surface soil under the water tower at Roebling
Park will  be excavated if lead levels exceed
250 mg/kg.        Because  the  remaining
components of  the remedy involve removal of
contaminant  sources  to   prevent additional
migration, no other specific performance  goals
were given.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Acids;  Arsenic;  Carcinogenic
Compounds;   Chromium;   Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Incineration;   Inorganics;  Interim   Remedy;
Leachability  Tests;   Lead;  Metals;  Offsite
Disposal;  Offsite Treatment;  Oils;  Organics;
PCBs;  RCRA; Soil;  Solidification/Stabilization;
Temporary Storage;  Toxic  Substances Control
Act;  Treatment  Technology.
                                              95

-------
            SARNEY FARM, NY
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The  143-acre  Sarney  Farm  site includes  a
former  5-acre  landfill in  Amenia,  Dutchess
County, New  York.  Land use  in the area  is
agricultural  and includes  wetlands.   The site
overlies a bedrock aquifer, which is currently
used    as    a   drinking    water    source.
Approximately 2,000 residences  are  located
within one  mile of the  site.    In  1968, the
portion of  the site that  included  a  5-acre
sanitary  landfill  was  purchased by  Harris
Haul-A-Way.   Investigations later  that year
revealed  that  industrial   wastes  including
approximately 40 drums of waste solvents were
being  disposed  of  illegally  in  several  onsite
areas.   In 1970, the State  ordered the  illegal
dumping  to cease.   Site  studies by private
parties have identified two trench areas used
for hazardous waste disposal,  and  acting  as
localized sources of  onsite soil contamination.
In both areas,  soil contaminants have infiltrated
into  the onsite ground water,  but only  in
limited amounts.   Approximately 40  drums
were  crushed  or  buried  onsite  in  the  two
disposal areas.    In 1987,  EPA initiated  a
removal/treatment   action    for   organic
contamination, including  installing  an  in-situ
soil washing system at two areas. One of these
areas is addressed in this  Record of Decision
(ROD). This  ROD addresses the remediation
of onsite contaminated soil, debris, and ground
water  in  two source  areas.    The primary
contaminants  of concern  affecting   the  soil,
debris, and  grpund water are VOCs including
toluene; other  organics including pesticides; and
metals including lead.

The  selected  remedial  action   for   this site
includes removing  waste drums  from  trench
areas 2 and 4 and disposing of  these offsite at
a    permitted   facility;    treating   onsite
approximately   2,365    cubic   yards    of
contaminated  soil from the areas surrounding
the drums storage area using low temperature
thermal treatment, or if soil contamination is at
highly  elevated levels, the  surrounding soil
may be removed offsite and disposed of with
the drums; backfilling the excavated  areas with
any  onsite-treated  soil;  allowing for natural
attenuation   of  ground   water; conducting
hydrogeologic studies onsite to better define the
hydrologic condition of the site;  ground water
and    surface   water    monitoring;    and
implementing  institutional  controls  including
deed restrictions.  The present worth cost for
this remedial action is $907,500, which includes
an annual O&M cost of $15300 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup  levels for soil  are
based on risk-based levels (10s) and  include
TCE 0.2 ug/1,  and  toluene  3.3 ug/1.   These
levels  are  based   on  the  maximum   soil
concentrations   needed  to  reach  a  99.9%
treatment   efficiency.       Ground   water
contaminant  levels are expected  to  decrease
once source contamination is eliminated.  The
estimated  time  frame   for   ground  water
attenuation to acceptable levels is 30 years.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:        Deed
restrictions will be implemented   to  prevent
ground  water use at source areas.

KEYWORDS:  Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Water  Act;  Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Excavation; Ground Water
Monitoring;  Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal  Destruction;
Institutional  Controls;  Lead;  Metals;  O&M;
Offsite  Treatment;  Offsite  Disposal;  Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; Pesticides;
Safe Drinking Water Act;  Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Monitoring;  TCE;     Treatment   Technology;
Toluene; VOCs.
        SAYREVILLE LANDFILL, NJ
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  35-acre  Sayreville Landfill   site  is  an
inactive municipal and industrial landfill in the
Borough of Sayreville, Middlesex County,  New
Jersey.  The site overlies several  sedimentary
aquifers, includes a tidal wetlands area, and
lies within the 500-year floodplain  of the South
River, which forms the western boundary of
the site.  Surrounding land use is industrial.
Beginning  in  1971,  the landfill was used to
dispose of  municipal and  hazardous  wastes,
including  an  estimated 50 to  150  drums
containing hazardous wastes.  The drums  were
buried in a 20-acre  area of the site.  In  1977,
landfill  operations  ceased,  but   subsequent
unauthorized dumping of hazardous waste may
have occurred.  In 1980, a landfill  closure plan
was implemented by the borough, but was not
properly  completed.    In  1981,  the  State
excavated   30   drums  containing  benzene,
                                              96

-------
pesticide-,   and   acid-contaminated   liquids.
Investigations from 1986  to  1990,  revealed
ground and surface water  contamination as a
result   of   migration   of   onsite   landfill
contaminants, and the  data  were  used  to
further characterize contaminant sources within
the landfill.  This  Record  of Decision (ROD)
addresses  remediation  of  onsite  drummed
wastes.   A subsequent  ROD will  address
further  source  remediation   (leachate)  and
remediation of ground and surface waters. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and debris are VOCs  including  benzene,
toluene, and xylenes; other organics including
pesticides  and  phenols;  acids;  and metals
including arsenic, chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes excavating the remaining  50 to 150
drums buried onsite, and thermally treating the
drummed  waste  offsite;  disposing   of  the
residual ash offsite; installing a multi-media cap
over  the  landfill;  constructing  passive  gas
collection and surface runoff control systems at
the landfill;  monitoring  ground  and  surface
waters, stream sediment, and air to determine
the need  for subsequent  remedial activities
and/or a  leachate collection  and treatment
system; and implementing institutional controls
including deed  restrictions,  and  site access
restrictions such  as fencing.   The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$16,516,600, which  includes  a  present worth
O&M cost of $746,400 for year one, $431,800 for
years  2-5, and $354,600 for  years 6-30.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels  will be  based  on the  State
Interim Soil  Action Levels  (ISALs) including
arsenic 20 mg/kg (ISAL), chromium 100 mg/kg
(ISAL), and lead 250-1,000 mg/kg (ISAL).

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions will be  implemented at  the site to
restrict  landfill property  and  ground  water
usage.

KEYWORDS:  Acids; Air Monitoring;  Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean  Air  Act; Clean  Water Act;
Debris; Direct Contact;  Excavation; Floodplain;
Ground   Water    Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Treatment;  Onsite Containment; Onsite
Disposal; Organics; Pesticides; Phenols;  Safe
Drinking    Water   Act;    Soil;    State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Monitoring; Toluene; Toxic Substances Control
Act; Treatment Technology;  VOCs; Wetlands;
Xylenes.
 SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING, NJ
            First Remedial Action
             September 14, 1990

The 6-acre Scientific Chemical Processing site is
a  former chemical handling, treatment,  and
disposal facility in Carlstadt,  Bergen County,
New  Jersey.  The site is  in a light industrial
area adjacent to an extensive salt marsh and
wetlands  area,  and is also considered to be
within  the  floodplain  of tributaries  to the
Hackensack River.  The site is underlain by a
system  of three  aquifers,  all of which have
been contaminated by the site.  The water table
aquifer flows into a Hackensack River tributary;
the bedrock aquifer is a current drinking water
source for the vicinity. Prior to 1970, and until
its closure in 1980, a wide variety of industrial
and chemical wastes  were disposed of at the
site.  Many of these  wastes were  apparently
released  onsite.   In  1985, EPA  required the
removal  of five tanks  of waste  containing
numerous hazardous materials including PCBs;
and four were removed.  At present, one  tank
remains onsite due to  the complex mixture and
high concentrations of wastes present, and the
failure to locate an appropriate treatment and
disposal  facility to accept  the  waste.    This
Record of Decision (ROD)  outlines  an  interim
remedy for source control and management of
contaminant migration while further study  is
conducted   to   find   a  suitable   treatment
technology for the onsite wastes.  Future RODs
will address final source  and ground water
remedial activities.  The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil and  ground water
are VOCs including  benzene,  PCE, phenols,
TCE,  toluene,  and   xylenes;  other organics
including PAHs, PCBs, and pesticides; metals
including arsenic, chromium, and  lead;  and
other  inorganics.

The selected remedial  action for  this site is an
interim  remedy,  which includes installing  a
slurry wall  around  the site  perimeter to  a
depth of 15 to 20 feet (corresponding to the top
of  a  confining  clay  layer);   installing  a
temporary infiltration barrier  over the  site
surface  to  minimize   entry  of  precipitation;
extracting ground water from within the slurry
wall boundary  for the purpose of dewatering
                                              97

-------
onsite  soil  and  controlling   movement  of
contaminated ground water away from the site;
transporting extracted ground water offsite for
pretreatment, treatment, and disposal; ground
water  and  surface  water monitoring;  and
maintaining a  fence  around  the  site.  The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,933,000, which  includes  an annual
O&M cost of $42,000 for 3  years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels for the contaminants  of concern
have not been  set due to the interim nature of
this remedy. Chemical-specific  ARARs will be
met for final remedies, and will be presented in
subsequent RODs.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Chromium;   Clean  Water  Act;
Deferred Decision;  Direct  Contact;  Drinking
Water   Contaminants;  Floodplain;   Ground
Water; Ground Water  Monitoring; Inorganics;
Interim  Remedy;  Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal;   Offsite   Treatment;    Onsite
Containment;  Organics;  PAHs;  PCBs;  PCE;
Pesticides; Phenols; Plume Management; RCRA;
Slurry Wall; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface  Water  Monitoring;   TCE;  Toluene;
Treatability Studies; VOCs;  Wetlands; Xylenes.
      SEALAND RESTORATION, NY
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  210-acre  Sealand Restoration site  is  a
former  liquid  waste  disposal  and   storage
facility in the town of Lisbon,  St. Lawrence
County,  New  York.    Both  wetland   and
woodland  areas  are  onsite.   The   site  is
underlain by a shallow alluvial aquifer and a
deeper   bedrock   aquifer,  which may  be
hydraulically connected to  one another in the
site area.  Approximately 25 private wells and
one municipal well  are within one mile of the
site.  The municipal water  system  draws  from
the bedrock aquifer.   In  1979,  supposedly
uncontaminated  liquid petroleum  wastes and
mineral  oils  were  disposed of  in   several
locations, including  a land application/disposal
area, a cell disposal area,  and a  drum storage
area.  In  1980, the State found Sealand to  be  in
non-compliance  by  accepting  contaminated
wastes, their permits were revoked, and onsite
disposal  operations  ceased.  From 1983 to  1984,
the State  conducted a remedial investigation
that identified several onsite areas of concern.
The land  application area was contaminated
with   PCBs   as   a  result   of   improper
land spreading practices. The cell disposal area
was found to have sediment contaminated with
potentially high levels of a chemical solvent.
The drum storage area contained 200 empty or
nearly empty drums seeping  tar-like residue
onsite, a  tanker  trailer containing  less than
1,000  gallons of waste oil, and a storage tank
containing 5,000 gallons  of  waste oil.  From
1987   to   1990,  the  State   removed  the
contaminated soil and debris and documented
these  as part  of this Record of  Decision (ROD).
The purpose of this  ROD is to  review the State
action and to determine its appropriateness for
reimbursement of costs under CERCLA.  A
follow-up  investigation will be conducted to
determine  the  extent  of  ground  water  and
wetlands  contamination,  as   well   as  any
remaining soil  contamination.   A subsequent
ROD  will address   these media,  if deemed
necessary.    The  primary  contaminants  of
concern potentially affecting the soil and debris
are VOCs  including  benzene, TCE, toluene, and
xylenes; other  organics including PCBs,  and
pesticides; and metals including chromium and
lead.

The   selected  remedial action for  the  site,
performed by  the  State, was found  to  be
appropriate as an interim action, and included
excavating 1,445 drums and 4,762  cubic yards
of contaminated soil, along with the removal of
375,000 gallons of liquid  waste from the cell
disposal area, incinerating these wastes offsite,
and   disposing  of  residuals at   a   RCRA
hazardous waste  facility; capping   the  cell
disposal area with a multi-layer cap; installing
a  leachate monitoring system; removing 200
empty or nearly empty drums, 5,000  gallons of
oily waste from an above-ground storage tank,
and 1,000 gallons of waste oil  from the tanker
trailer, along with the excavation and removal
of 20  cubic yards of contaminated soil all from
the drum storage area; treating and  disposing
of these wastes offsite in a  RCRA-permitted
Subtitle C facility; and backfilling the area with
clean  soil. The estimated capital  cost of this
remedial  action is  $20,000,000.   The  cost of
O&M as well as the total present worth cost
associated with the  remedy have not yet been
determined.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No contaminant-specific goals  were provided.
                                              98

-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Benzene; Capping;  Chromium;
Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct  Contact;
Excavation;  Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Interim Remedy; Lead; Metals;  O&M; Offsite
Disposal;   Offsite  Treatment;  Oils; Onsite
Containment; Organics; PCBs; Pesticides; RCRA;
Soil;   Solvents;   TCE;  Toluene;   Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
          SOLVENT SAVERS, NY
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The  13-acre Solvent Savers site  is  a  former
chemical waste recovery facility in Lincklaen,
Chenango County,  New  York.   The  site is
bordered by Mud Creek to the east and by an
intermittent stream to the north. Between 1967
and 1974, a variety  of wastes including solids,
liquids, and sludge  from a distillation process
used to recover solvents were disposed of at
the   facility.       Concurrently,    a   drum
reconditioning process was also operated onsite.
EPA and  State investigations conducted from
1981 to 1982 revealed metals, VOCs, and other
organic compounds including  PCBs  in  onsite
soil,  and  metals and  VOCs  in  the ground
water.   The site has been separated into  five
principal source areas, which contain a total of
59,000  cubic yards  of  contaminated soil,  300
buried and 100 surficial drums, and 578,000,000
gallons of contaminated ground water. In 1989,
EPA required  seven Potentially  Responsible
Parties (PRPs)  to conduct an extensive removal
action,  which  included   removing  and/or
treating   all   drums  and  the   associated
contaminated soil. To the extent that the work
is  not completed by the  PRPs  in  a  timely
fashion  or  to  the  extent   that   any  soil
contamination   will  remain onsite  following
completion of that  work,  the remedial  action
documented in this  ROD will be implemented.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, debris, and ground water are  VOCs
including  PCE and  TCE;  other  organics
including  carcinogenic  and  noncarcinogenic
PAHs, PCBs, and phenols; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating 300 buried drums, followed
by treating and disposing  of the  drums  and
associated wastes at an offsite RCRA facility;
excavating 59,000 cubic yards of contaminated
soil from two highly contaminated source areas,
followed by treating soil highly contaminated
with  VOCs  onsite  using  low  temperature
thermal extraction; treating approximately 1,000
cubic yards of the excavated PCB-contammated
soil  using the same thermal  process or  by
incinerating the soil offsite, based on the results
of   a   treatability   study;   treating   soil
contaminated with low  levels of VOCs using
soil flushing and/or vapor extraction processes,
based on the results of a  treatability study;
treating  any  organic  vapors  from  the  soil
treatment using an  as  yet  undetermined  air
pollution control system; backfilling excavated
areas with treatment residuals and clean fill;
ground  water pumping and treatment onsite
using chemical precipitation, air stripping, and
carbon  adsorption,  followed  by  reinjection
and/or discharge to surface water; disposing of
ground  water treatment residuals offsite; and
monitoring  air  and ground  water.   The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action  is  $29,350,000,   which  includes  an
estimated annual O&M cost of $523,000 for 20
years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Initial  soil cleanup  levels are based on  an
average  of  model-derived cleanup  levels  to
prevent further contamination of ground water,
and  include PCE 2.2 mg/kg, TCE 0.8 mg/kg,
toluene   1.5  mg/kg  and xylenes  3.1 mg/kg.
PCB-contaminated soil will be treated to attain
the  level of  1  mg/kg  (TSCA PCB policy).
Chemical-specific goals  for ground  water are
based  primarily  on  the  more stringent  of
SDWA  MCLs or  State standards.    Cleanup
goals for over 50 contaminants are provided in
the   ROD,   including  PCE  5 ug/1   (CLP
Quantitation Limit), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), arsenic
25 ug/1   (State),    noncarcinogenic   PAHs
32,340 ug/1    (health-based),   and   phenols
48,500 ug/1 (health-based).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic;   Carbon   Adsorption    (GAC);
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Chromium; Clean
Air Act; Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct
Contact;  Excavation;  Offsite  Disposal; Ground
Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground
Water   Treatment;    Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;  Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs;  PCBs;  PCE;  Phenols;  RCRA;  Safe
                                             99

-------
Drinking   Water    Act,    Soil;    Soil
Washing/Flushing;   Solvents;   State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatability Studies;  Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
         SYOSSET LANDFILL, NY
           First Remedial Action
             September 27, 1990

The  35-acre Syosset  Landfill site is a closed
municipal landfill in Syosset, Oyster Bay, New
York.  Surrounding  land use is  high-density
residential and industrial. The site overlies a
sole-source aquifer, and eight  public  supply
wells are  located within 3 miles of the site.
From 1933  to 1975, commercial,  industrial,
residential, demolition, and agricultural wastes,
sludge, and ash were disposed of in the onsite
landfill. Typical wastes included heavy metals,
solvents,  organics,  oils,  sludge,  and  metal
hydroxides.   The  county closed the landfill in
1975  because  of suspected  ground  water
contamination.     Subsequent  studies  have
confirmed ground water contamination beneath
and  downgradient of the site resulting from
landfill  leachate.   This Record  of Decision
(ROD) addresses source control at the site.  A
subsequent ROD  will  address  onsite ground
water   contamination.       The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
VOCs  including  benzene,  PCE, TCE, and
toluene; other organics; and  metals including
arsenic.

The  selected  remedial  action for  this  site
includes placing a geosynthetic membrane cap
over the landfill area; installing a passive gas
venting system,  in  addition  to  the  venting
system  installed   during  the   1975   landfill
closure;  maintaining  the  cap  and  venting
system; conducting  air  and ground  water
monitoring;   and   implementing  institutional
controls including land use restrictions, and site
access  restrictions  including  fencing.   The
estimated  present worth cost for this remedial
action is $26,200,000,  which includes an annual
O&M cost of $222,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Not  applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls including land use restrictions will be
implemented.
KEYWORDS:     Air   Monitoring;   Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping;  Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Direct Contact;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Institutional  Controls;  Metals;
O&M;  Onsite  Containment; Organics;  PCE;
RCRA; Soil; Sole-Source Aquifer; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;  Venting;
VOCs.
     VESTAL WATER SUPPLY 1-1, NY
       Second Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The Vestal Water Supply 1-1  site is located in
Vestal, Broom County, New York. The site is
on the south bank of the Susquehanna River,
and lies east of Choconut Creek.  The site lies
within the floodplain of the Susquehanna River,
and contains several wetland areas.  Well No.
1-1  is one of  three production wells  that
provide  drinking  water  to  several  water
districts in  the  Vestal area.   A  State  Road
Industrial  Park  thought to  be  a source of
contamination is located 1,500 feet  southeast of
the Vestal Well No.  1-1.   Chlorinated solvents
were  first detected  in Well  No.  1-1  in  1978,
after  a chemical spill at a  plant in nearby
Endicott  led to the  testing  of wells in the
vicinity  for  specific  synthetic   compounds.
Subsequently, contaminated ground water was
pumped from this well and discharged offsite
to   the    Susquehanna   River.       Further
investigations  determined  that the chlorinated
solvents present in  Well No.  1-1 could not be
attributed to  the chemical  spill at  the IBM
plant.   A  1986 Record  of  Decision (ROD)
documented  the selection of  ground  water
treatment  using air stripping  to remove VOCs,
addressed Well 1-1 contamination, and required
additional studies of four potential source areas
in the State Road Industrial  Park.  This ROD
addresses contaminated soil in the four source
areas and is a final remedy.  This ROD also
addresses a contingency remedy  for  potable
water, if needed.  The  primary contaminants
of  concern  affecting  the   soil  are  VOCs
including   TCE   and  PCE;   other   organics
including    PAHs;   and   metals   including
chromium and lead.

The   selected  remedial   action  for  this site
includes  treating the soil by in-situ vacuum
extraction to remove VOCs in two of the four
source areas within the State Road  Industrial
Park, followed by carbon absorption  to control
air emissions;  disposing of the residual carbon
                                             100

-------
offsite; and ground  water monitoring.   This
ROD  provides  a  contingency  remedy  for
ground water treatment using precipitation and
filtration to remove heavy metals in addition to
the  current  treatment,   as  necessary.   The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,700,000.  There are no annual O&M
costs associated with  this  selected  remedial
action.  The estimated present  worth cost for
the contingency remedy  is $17,900,000, which
includes  an estimated annual  O&M cost  of
$925,000.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil in the
two  source  areas  include  TCE  140 ug/kg,
1,1,1-TCA 170 ug/kg, and 1,2-DCE 188 ug/kg
(for Area 2 only).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Background  Levels;  Benzene;
Carbon  Adsorption   (GAC);   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Contingency Remedy;
Direct Contact; Drinking  Water Contaminants;
Floodplain;  Ground  Water; Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Institutional   Controls;   Lead;
MCLGs; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Treatment; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs; PCBs;  PCE;  Safe  Drinking Water Act;
Soil;  TCE;  Treatment Technology;  Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs; Wetlands.
         WOODLAND TOWNSHIP
           ROUTE 72 DUMP, NJ
           First Remedial Action
               May 16,  1990

The  12-acre  Woodland  Township  Route  72
Dump site is an abandoned hazardous  waste
dump  in  Woodland  Township,  Burlington
County,  New  Jersey.   The site   is  being
remediated   concurrently    with    another
abandoned  dump,  the   20-acre  Woodland
Township Route 532 Dump site, located 3 miles
from the Route 72 site.  Both sites are in the
Pinelands Preservation Area  District  of New
Jersey.  Several chemical  manufacturing firms
dumped   chemicals  and  other  wastes  into
trenches  and  lagoons or  burned  the waste at
the sites from  the early  1950s to 1962.   An
estimated total of 54,000 cubic yards  (Route 72,
28,000  cubic  yards;  Route 532,  26,000  cubic
yards) of surface material including surface soil,
stream sediment, sludge, and debris at the sites
are contaminated  with wastes including tarry
substances and paint residues.  Furthermore,
leaching from surface materials has resulted in
the contamination of 300,000 cubic yards (Route
72, 130,000 cubic yards;  Route 532,  170,000
cubic yards) of subsurface soil and  ground
water  beneath both  sites.   This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses  surface material and
ground water remediation at both  sites.  A
subsequent ROD  will address subsurface  soil.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the surface soil, sediment, sludge, debris,  and
ground water  are  VOCs including benzene,
toluene, TCE and  xylenes; organics  including
PAHs, pesticides, and phenols; radionuclides
(e.g., uranium and thorium series); and metals
including  lead and chromium.

The selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes excavation,  further  characterization,
and offsite disposal at a permitted facility of
54,000 cubic yards  (total  from both sites) of
contaminated surface  soil, sludge,  debris  and
sediment;  offsite  disposal of  19 cubic yards
(total   from   both   sites)   of  radiologically
contaminated  surface  materials including  a
drum  of  radioactive  pellets;  ground  water
pumping  and treatment with  treatment to be
determined  during design (but anticipated to
include air stripping, metals removal, biological
treatment, and  advanced oxidation  or  carbon
adsorption)  and reinjection of treated  ground
water;  and  ground  and   surface   water
monitoring. The total estimated present worth
cost for the concurrent remedial actions at the
Route 72  and Route 532 sites is $142,200,000,
which includes an estimated  present  worth
O&M cost of $114,000,000  for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Soil  cleanup   objectives  have  been   based
primarily  on State standards and background
levels  including  total VOCs  1 mg/kg,  total
chromium  100 mg/kg,  pesticides  (DDT  and
metabolites)    10 mg/kg,   and   lead
250-1,000 mg/kg   (based    on   State   risk
assessment).   Ground water  nondegradation
remedial   goals   are  based  on    natural
background levels for the Pine Barrens area
including  benzene 0.88 ug/1, pesticides (DDT
and metabolites) 0.001 ug/1, toluene 1.2 ug/1,
TCE  0.38 ug/1,  total  xylenes  1.0 ug/1,  and
phenols 0.15 ug/1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
                                             101

-------
KEYWORDS:  Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Background  Levels;  Benzene;  Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground  Water;  Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Offsite  Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;  Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Pesticides; Phenols;
Radioactive Materials; RCRA; Sediment;  Sludge;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies;
VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
         WOODLAND TOWNSHIP
           ROUTE 532 DUMP, NJ
            First Remedial Action
                May 16, 1990

The  20-acre Woodland Township Route 532
Dump site is  an abandoned hazardous waste
dump in  Woodland  Township, Burlington
County,  New  Jersey.    The  site  is  being
remediated   concurrently    with   another
abandoned dump,  the 12-acre Woodland Route
72 Dump site, located  3 miles from the Route
532  site.    Both sites are  in the Pinelands
Preservation  Area District  of  New  Jersey.
Several chemical manufacturing firms dumped
chemicals and other wastes into  trenches and
lagoons or burned the waste at the sites from
the early 1950s to  1962.  An estimated  total of
54,000 cubic  yards (Route  72,  28,000  cubic
yards; Route 532, 26,000 cubic yards) of surface
material including surface soil, stream sediment,
sludge, and debris  at the sites are contaminated
with  wastes including tarry  substances  and
paint  residues.   Furthermore, leaching  from
surface  materials  has   resulted   in  the
contamination of 300,000 cubic yards (Route 72,
130,000 cubic  yards; Route  532, 170,000  cubic
yards) of  subsurface soil  and ground water
beneath  both  sites.   Contaminated  ground
water discharges to a cranberry bog  and an
adjacent bog reservoir.  This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses surface material and  ground
water remediation at both sites.  A subsequent
ROD will address subsurface soil. The primary
contaminants  of concern affecting the surface
soil,  sediment,  sludge,  debris,  and  ground
water are  VOCs  including benzene,  TCE,
toluene, and xylenes; organics including PAHs,
pesticides,   and phenols;  radionuclides  (e.g.,
uranium  and  thorium  series);   and   metals
including chromium and lead.
The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  excavation,  further  characterization,
and  offsite disposal  at a permitted facility  of
54,000  cubic  yards (total from both  sites)  of
contaminated  surface  soil,  sediment,  sludge,
and  debris; offsite disposal  of 19  cubic yards
(total  from   both  sites)   of  radiologically
contaminated  surface  materials  including  a
drum  of  radioactive  pellets;  ground  water
pumping and treatment  with treatment to be
determined during design  (but anticipated  to
include air stripping, metals removal, biological
treatment, and advanced oxidation or carbon
adsorption) and reinjection  of treated ground
water;   and   ground   and  surface  water
monitoring.  The total estimated present worth
cost  for the concurrent remedial actions at the
Route  72 and Route 532 sites is  $142,200,000,
which  includes  an  estimated  present  worth
O&M cost of $114,000,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil  cleanup  objectives have  been  based
primarily on  State standards and  background
levels  including  total VOCs 1 mg/kg,  total
chromium  100 mg/kg, pesticides (DDT  and
metabolites)  10 mg/kg,  and lead  250  to
1,000 mg/kg  (based  on State risk  assessment).
Ground water nondegradation remedial goals
are based on  natural background levels for the
Pine Barrens  area including benzene 0.88 ug/1,
pesticides (DDT and metabolites) 0.001 ug/1,
toluene 1.2 ug/1,  TCE 0.38 ug/1,  total xylenes
1.0 ug/1, and phenols 0.15  ug/1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Background  Levels;  Benzene;  Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water  Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground  Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal;   Onsite   Discharge;  Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Pesticides; Phenols;
Radioactive Materials; RCRA; Sediment; Sludge;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Surface
Water  Monitoring; Toluene; Treatability Studies;
VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
                                              102

-------
                            RECORDS  OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 3
             (Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia)
       ARMY CREEK LANDFILL, DE
       Second Remedial Action - Final
               June 29, 1990

The  Army Creek Landfill site, a former sand
and  gravel quarry, is approximately two miles
southwest of New Castle, Delaware.  The site
abuts  Army Creek/Pond  and  high  quality
wetlands  to the  south and  east  and  lies
adjacent to Delaware  Sand & Gravel  Landfill,
another Superfund  site.  From  1960  to 1968,
when the  landfill reached capacity and closed,
the   44-acre  municipal  landfill  accepted
approximately  1.9  million  cubic yards  of
municipal and industrial wastes. Ground water
problems first became apparent in 1971, when
a  residential well  downgradient  of  the  site
developed water quality problems. Since 1972,
EPA, the State, and  the county have continued
to sample the ground water and have identified
ground  water  contaminants  indicative  of
hazardous  waste disposal.   A  contaminant
plume has also been identified downgradient of
the  landfill.   In 1973,  the  county  installed
recovery  wells  to  intercept  the  contaminant
plume and  to create  a  ground water  divide
between the Army Creek Landfill and nearby
potable water supply wells.  A 1986 Record of
Decision  (ROD)  provided for capping  of the
landfill and for the  continued operation of the
recovery well network to maintain the ground
water  divide.   The extracted  ground  water
currently  discharges  untreated   into  Army
Creek/Pond.  This  ROD, the second  of two
operable units, addresses the  need to treat the
recovered   ground  water  prior  to   onsite
discharge into Army Creek/Pond.  The primary
contaminant of concern with respect to the
impact of  discharge to surface water is iron.

The  selected  remedial   action  for  this  site
includes  ground  water  pumping  using  the
recovery well network and treatment using  a
modified   conventional  precipitation   water
treatment   plant  which   involves  aeration,
precipitation,  sedimentation,  and  filtration
followed by onsite discharge  of the effluent to
Army  Creek/Pond;  sampling   and   offsite
disposal of the sludge  generated during the
treatment   process;  and monitoring  of  the
sediment,   recovered  ground water,   surface
water, and wetlands.  The estimated  present
worth cost for this remedial action is $4,900,000,
which   includes  an  annual  O&M  cost of
$294,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
The  recovered  ground water  will meet State
water quality criteria prior to  onsite discharge
into  Army  Creek/Pond.   Chemical-specific
goals include iron 1,000 ug/1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Aeration;  Clean Water  Act;
Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring;  Ground Water Treatment; Metals;
O&M;   Offsite  Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface  Water Monitoring; Wetlands.
            AVTEX FIBERS, VA
          Second Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  440-acre  Avtex Fibers site  is  a former
synthetic fibers manufacturing facility in Front
Royal, Warren County, Virginia.   The site is
bounded by the South Fork of the Shenandoah
River  to  the  west  and  northwest,  and  by
residential areas to the south, northeast,  and
east.   A  section of the  site  lies within  the
100-year Shenandoah River floodplain.   The
plant produced rayon  (1940-1989),  polyester
(1970-1977),   and   polypropylene   fibers
(1985-1989).    Until  1983,  the  by-products,
including  sodium  cellulose   xanthate-based
viscose waste and zinc hydroxide sludge, were
disposed  of   onsite   in  unlined   surface
impoundments or landfills.  Subsequently,  the
waste  was  routed to an onsite  wastewater
treatment facility.   Fly ash (from incinerator
exhaust air pollution control devices) and boiler
house  solids were  disposed of in four other
surface  impoundments and one fly ash waste
pile.  In 1982, a  State investigation  identified
carbon disulfide, a constituent of viscose waste,
in residential  wells located across  the river
from the plant. In 1983 and 1984, in response
to  the  result of  this  investigation, Avtex
implemented interim measures to address  this
ground  water  contamination by purchasing 23
subdivision  properties  in  the   area  with
                                             103

-------
contaminated  ground  water,  providing  an
alternate water supply to permanent residents,
and  implementing a  ground  water pumping
and  treatment  program.   A  1988  Record of
Decision (ROD) addressed  further remediation
of ground  water and  dewatering of 3 onsite
viscose basin surface impoundments.  In 1989,
State   site   investigations  identified  PCB
contamination in the  soil and in Shenandoah
River fish.  This contamination may have been
the result of a transformer explosion, general
maintenance  practices  within  the  facility's
polyester drying area, and subsequent discharge
of  PCB-contaminated  wastewater  from the
plant's sewer system to the Shenandoah River.
In October  1989, EPA  issued an Administrative
Order (AO) to the site owners, Avtex Fibers
Inc., requiring PCB cleanup and identification
and  disposal  of  drummed  wastes  present
onsite.  The State  revoked the plant's NPDES
permit,   and  Avtex  subsequently  ceased
operations.  In 1989,  EPA  initiated  a removal
action  to stabilize the drummed wastes.  In
1990, EPA  issued another AO and  the former
site  owners  took over the  maintenance of
freeboard in sulfate basins and the continuation
of wastewater  treatment  onsite.   This  ROD
addresses  the  removal of PCB-contaminated
soil, breakdown of the acid reclamation facility,
and  the disposal of drummed wastes thought
to contain oils, bases, acids, solvents, and PCBs.
Also, this ROD addresses site security, control,
maintenance, and  health and safety measures.
A  subsequent  ROD  will address  possible
remediation  of remaining contamination of
onsite   structures,  surface water,   sediment,
ground  water,  sewer  system, and  waste
disposal areas.  The  primary  contaminants of
concern  affecting the  soil  and   debris are
organics including PCBs.

The  selected remedial  action  for  this site
includes excavation  and  offsite disposal of
approximately   5,000  cubic  yards   of  soil
contaminated  with  PCB  levels   exceeding
10 mg/kg, followed by restoration of excavated
areas; identification of drum contents, treatment
and  offsite disposal of drum contents that are
RCRA wastes; decontaminating and recycling or
crushing   the  empty  drums  followed  by
incineration or  disposal in a  RCRA landfill;
dismantlement of the  unstable acid reclamation
facility with decontamination, as necessary; and
disposing of unusable  rubble and  machinery
onsite.     Drums  containing  nonhazardous
substances will remain onsite and available for
liquidation by the corporate trustee upon EPA's
approval.  The fourth component of this ROD
is site security, maintenance, control, and health
and  safety measures.   The estimated capital
cost  for this  remedial  action  is  $8,708,400.
There are no O&M costs associated with this
remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Cleanup levels for PCB-contaminated soil  are
based   on  EPA   published   guidance  on
"Remedial Actions  for  Superfund  Sites with
PCB Contamination." The recommended action
level  for  industrial  land use soil  is PCB
10-25 mg/kg.  For this site, all soil in excess of
10 mg/kg of PCB will be removed.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS: Acids; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris;   Decontamination;   Direct   Contact;
Excavation;  Floodplain;  Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment;
Oils; Onsite Disposal; Organics; PCBs; RCRA;
Soil;  Solvents;  State  Standards/Regulations;
Toxic  Substances  Control  Act;  Treatment
Technology.
   BROWN'S BATTERY BREAKING, PA
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 14-acre Brown's Battery Breaking site is an
inactive lead-acid battery processing facility in
Tilden Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania.
The  area  surrounding the site is primarily
agricultural with  scattered rural  residences.
The  site is bordered by  Conrail  tracks,  Mill
Creek, and the Schuylkill River.  The site  lies
within the  100-year floodplain  of the Schuylkill
River.  From 1961 to 1971, the facility recovered
lead-bearing  materials from automobiles and
truck batteries by breaking the battery casings,
draining the acid, and recovering the lead alloy
grids, plates, and plugs.  During this time, the
crushed  casings were used as a substitute for
road gravel or disposed of onsite.  The State
conducted  onsite  and  offsite  investigations
during   the   1980s   that   identified   lead
concentrations in excess of acceptable limits in
residents, livestock, soil, and surface waters. A
1983 EPA investigation revealed extensive lead
contamination  in  onsite   soil  and sediment
located in  the Schuylkill River.  As a result of
the investigation, EPA initiated an Immediate
Removal Request to relocate three families and
to excavate and consolidate 13,000 cubic yards
                                              104

-------
of contaminated soil and battery casings into an
onsite containment area, that was covered with
a low  permeability cap.  A second removal,
initiated  in  1990,  consisted  of   temporarily
relocating all  onsite residents.  The cleanup
strategy for the site consists of three operable
units: site access; remediation of onsite soil and
battery casings; and ground water remediation.
This Record of Decision addresses site access;
subsequent  actions  will   address  soil   and
ground  water remediation.   The  primary
contaminant of concern affecting  the soil  and
sediment is lead.

The  selected  remedial action for  this  site
includes  permanently  relocating  all  onsite
residents and  businesses to compatible offsite
locations; decontaminating personal belongings,
as appropriate; and  implementing  site access
restrictions including fencing and institutional
controls  including  deed   restrictions.    The
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$342,900.  There are no O&M  costs associated
with this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
There are no chemical- specific ARARs  for this
operable unit.  The initial remedy will eliminate
human contact with the soil and sediment.  Site
use  and access  restrictions will  reduce  the
potential  for transport of contaminants  offsite.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions will  be  implemented  to prevent
future residential and industrial use of the  site.

KEYWORDS:     Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Decontamination;  Direct Contact;  Floodplain;
Institutional Controls;  Lead;  Metals;  Public
Exposure; Relocation; Sediment; Soil.
           BUTZ LANDFILL, PA
           First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The Butz Landfill site is an inactive landfill in
Jackson    Township,    Monroe   County,
Pennsylvania.      The   sole-source   aquifer
underlying the site supplies drinking water for
the vicinity, which includes approximately 3,300
people who live within three miles of the site
and an additional 3,000 people during tourist
seasons.  Beginning in 1965, municipal waste,
sewage sludge/liquids,  and  possibly  some
industrial wastes were accepted at  the landfill.
During the years the landfill was operated, the
waste was disposed of without a State permit.
In  1971, onsite investigations revealed well
water  contamination  and  the  presence  of
leachate seeps.  By 1973, the State ordered the
landfill  closed  and  required   that corrective
measures be taken, including the development
of a surface water management plan, ground
water monitoring, and  placement of a cover
over   the   landfill.      Additional   onsite
investigations in 1986 revealed  high TCE levels
in domestic  wells to the south of the landfill,
which prompted a request to EPA that the site
be considered  for emergency action.  In 1986,
the State and EPA initiated emergency response
activities,   including   additional  sampling,
installing water coolers, and supplying bottled
water  or  carbon   filters  to  homes  with
contaminated  well  water.   This Record  of
Decision addresses  the first   Operable Unit
(OU), which  establishes  an  alternate  water
supply.     Subsequent  OUs   will  address
remediation  of the contaminated soil, surface
water,   and  ground  water.     The  primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs, including PCE and TCE.

The selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes   construction  of new water service
lines and replacement  of pumps, valves, and
drinking water  storage  tanks; connection  of
new water  supply wells to approximately 49
residences; and construction of access roads, as
required.   The  total cost for  this remedial
action is $5,910,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $23,000 for 50 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup  goals  were  not
provided because this remedial alternative will
not address  ground  water contamination but
rather  will  mitigate and/or  prevent  human
exposure  to  currently  used  contaminated
ground  water.   The selected  alternative will
provide potable water that  will  meet SDWA
MCLs.  Water from  the water supply system
will meet State standards.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:     Alternate   Water   Supply;
Carcinogenic  Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground  Water;  MCLs;  O&M;  PCE;  Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source Aquifer; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs; Wetlands.
                                             105

-------
           C & R BATTERY, VA
        First Remedial Action - Final
               March 30, 1990

The  11-acre  C & R  Battery  site  is a  former
battery-sawing  and   shredding  facility   in
Chesterfield County, Virginia.  Open fields and
woods border the site on the north, south, and
west, a small fuel  oil distributor borders the
site  on  the  east,  and the  James  River  is
approximately 650 feet north of the site.  From
the early 1970s to 1985 the facility was used to
recycle  discarded batteries.    Site operations
included  draining  battery  acids into onsite
ponds, recovering and stockpiling lead and lead
compounds from the batteries, and  shredding
and  stockpiling battery casings  onsite.  The
State began  monitoring the  site in the late
1970s and  detected elevated lead levels in the
soil,  surface water,  and  ground  water.   An
OSHA inspection revealed indoor air levels of
lead   to  be  more   than  twice  the  OSHA
standards   of  50 ug/m3.     Also,   facility
employees were  found to have elevated lead
levels in their blood.  In response to public
health concerns, EPA  conducted  a removal
action in 1986, which  included extracting acidic
liquid from onsite lagoons and raising the pH
level of  the liquid  before  discharging  the
neutralized liquid into onsite  ditches.  Lagoon
sludge  was  neutralized and  returned  to  the
lagoon, and  surface soil was  also neutralized.
In addition, shredded battery  casings, soil, and
debris found east of  the drainage ditch, were
consolidated into two debris piles and  remain
onsite.   This remedial  action addresses  the
former acid pond area, the debris piles, and a
drainage ditch.   The  primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris, and
surface  water are metals  including lead and
arsenic.

The   selected remedial  action  for  this  site
includes the  demolition of a concrete pad and
dismantlement of a  storage shed followed  by
offsite  disposal  of  the  debris,  and  offsite
treatment,  if necessary, of surface water from
the drainage  ditch prior  to  the  excavation of
contaminated soil and sediment; excavation and
stabilization  of  approximately  36,800 cubic
yards  of  contaminated  soil, sediment, and
debris piles  followed by offsite  disposal in a
permitted  landfill; backfilling of all excavated
areas; soil cover  over all   areas  with  lead
contamination   above   background;   hybrid
closure (soil cover) for residual contamination
of lead-contaminated  soil outside the acid pond
area; clean closure of the acid pond area; offsite
treatment and disposal of 350 batteries; ground
and    surface   water    monitoring;   and
implementing  institutional controls including
site use restrictions.  The estimated present
worth   cost   for   this  remedial   action  is
$15,572,000,  which includes  an annual  O&M
cost of $14,550.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Soil will be excavated if the soil contaminants
exceed  established action  levels,  which  are
based  on a  10^ risk  level and include lead
1,000 mg/kg and arsenic 10 mg/kg. Accidental
ingestion route of  exposure will be eliminated.
Sediment  will  be  excavated  if   sediment
contaminants exceed action levels, which were
derived from a  Puget Sound Estuary Program
study,  and include lead 450 mg/kg and arsenic
57 mg/kg.    By  remediating  the   soil  and
sediment   to  these   levels,   exposure  via
inhalation of suspended particulates should also
be  acceptable.   The  soil  action  levels  will
remove   the   threat   of   ground   water
contamination.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls will be  used  to control future site use.

KEYWORDS:       Arsenic;   Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean Air Act;  Clean  Closure;
Debris; Direct  Contact;  Excavation;  Ground
Water  Monitoring; Hybrid/Alternate  Closure;
Institutional Controls; Leachability Tests; Lead;
Metals;   O&M;   Offsite   Disposal;   Offsite
Treatment;   RCRA;    Sediment;   Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization;   State
Standards/Regulations; Surface  Water; Surface
Water  Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
Treatability  Studies; Treatment Technology.
     COKER'S SANITATION SERVICE
              LANDFILLS, DE
         First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The Coker's  Sanitation Service Landfills site is
comprised of two inactive landfills, the 10-acre
landfill #1 and the  15-acre landfill #2, located
approximately 0.5 miles apart, in Kent County,
Delaware. Landfill #1 is  bordered to the north
by a forested wetland that includes a shallow
stream known  as the Willis Branch of  the
Lepisc River.  Land use in the area is primarily
agricultural  and  residential.    Each  landfill
contains approximately 45,000 cubic yards of
                                              106

-------
latex   sludge   waste  in  addition  to  the
contaminated soil/waste.  From 1969 to 1977,
latex rubber waste sludge was disposed of at
Landfill #1 into unlined  trenches,  which were
topped off with local  soil  when nearly filled
with sludge.  From 1976 to 1980, latex  sludge
was  also disposed  of in  lined  trenches at
Landfill  #2.    The landfill operating  permit
required  a leachate  collection and  treatment
system and a ground water monitoring system
to be installed.  Subsequently,  the latex  sludge
waste in both  landfills gradually  settled and
compacted   reducing  permeability    and
minimizing the amount  of leachate from the
site.  Excess levels of styrene and ethylbenzene
were  found  in the  waste  trenches  of both
landfills and in the leachate collection system of
landfill  #2.   This  Record  of  Decision  (ROD)
addresses contamination in both landfills and in
the leachate collection system at  Landfill #2.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the  soil  and  sludge are  VOCs  including
benzene and metals.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this site
includes  covering  the seeps  at Landfill #1;
backfilling depressed areas of  Landfill #2 and
sealing  the  Landfill  #2  leachate  collection
system;  monitoring  ground  and/or  surface
water;  and implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions on land use and site
access restrictions.  The estimated total cost for
this  remedial  action  is  $653,000,  with total
O&M costs of $527,257.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific goals are not  applicable, since
this  remedial   action   uses   no   treatment
technologies.    The  remedial  activities  will
reduce the cancer  risk level to  less than 10"6,
and the Hazard Index  to less than 1.0.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:        Deed
restrictions limiting  future land use will be
implemented  at both landfill properties.

KEYWORDS:       Benzene;    Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Direct  Contact;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Institutional  Controls;   Metals;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Sludge; Soil; Surface
Water Monitoring;  VOCs.
            CROYDON TCE, PA
       Second Remedial Action - Final
                June 29, 1990

The Croydon TCE site is in Bristol Township,
Bucks  County,  Pennsylvania.    A  series  of
studies conducted by EPA beginning in 1984
led to the detection  of  VOC contamination in
the ground  water over  a 3.5-square mile area
referred to as the study area.  The study area
is  predominantly residential with an estimated
3,000 residents.  A small southeastern portion
of the study area containing elevated levels of
VOCs,   particularly   TCE,  and  numerous
potential source areas have been  identified and
are referred to collectively as the "focused area
of  investigation."    This  smaller  area   is
composed   of   the   Croydon   residential
community  and  several  manufacturing  and
commercial  establishments.  The study area is
bordered on the south  by the Delaware River.
Neshaminy  Creek, which  borders the study
area to the  west, and Hog Run Creek, which
flows through the focused area of investigation,
both discharge  to the  river.   Although  the
source of contamination  has not been identified,
the contaminant plume  appears  to be flowing
south-southeast into  the East Branch of Hog
Run Creek  and  probably  into  the  Delaware
River.   A  1988  Record  of Decision  (ROD)
documented the  provision of a public water
supply to  11  residents within  the  identified
ground  water  contaminant plume area.  This
1990 ROD addresses  remediation of the ground
water contamination  at  the site.   The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the  ground
water are  VOCs including TCE and 1,1-DCE.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes  ground  water pumping and  onsite
treatment  using  air stripping,  followed  by
carbon adsorption as  an ancillary treatment step
before onsite discharge  of  the treated  ground
water;    vapor-phased   carbon    adsorption
treatment  of air stripper exhaust, followed by
offsite disposal or treatment of  spent  carbon;
implementation  of  institutional   controls   to
prevent  the  use of contaminated  ground water
during   remediation;   and   ground   water
monitoring.  The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial  action is $1,345,000,  which
includes  an estimated  annual O&M cost  of
$46,709  for  45  years (i.e.,  assuming  that  the
State ARARs of remediating ground water  to
background  levels are to be met by extending
treatment  from  30 to 45 years).
                                             107

-------
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
The  ground  water remedy  is  designed  to
contain further  migration of the plume while
attempting to restore ground water to the State
ARAR of background  levels,  including TCE
1 ug/1 and  1,1-DCE   1 ug/1  (assuming  no
additional  release of  contaminants  to  the
aquifer).    However, because  the  source  of
ground  water  contamination  has  not  been
identified, a permanent solution  may not  be
achieved.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  State and local
authorities will implement institutional controls,
including ground water use restrictions, in the
affected   area   to   prevent  the   use  of
contaminated ground water during remediation.

KEYWORDS:    Air   Stripping;  Background
Levels; Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact;  Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground  Water; Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
MCLs;   O&M;   Offsite    Disposal;  Onsite
Discharge;   Onsite   Treatment;   Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
             CRYO-CHEM, PA
          Second Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The   19-acre   Cryo-chem  site   is  a  metal
fabricating facility in Worman, Earl Township,
Berks County, Pennsylvania.  A woodland area
is  located northeast of  the site, and an onsite
stream  has  been  identified west  of  the
contaminant  area.   Between 1970 and  1982,
chemical solvents were  used at the facility at a
rate of two to three 55-gallon drums per year.
During  this time, a chemical  spill occurred at
Cryo-chem, but cannot  be definitely linked to
the source  of contamination.  Well sampling
conducted  during  1985  and 1987  showed
ground  water contamination in monitoring and
residential  wells  within 1 mile of  the  site,
which led to a removal  action that required the
installation of activated-carbon filter units in 14
affected homes.  In  1989, a Record of Decision
(ROD)  was  signed  for  Operable  Unit  One
(OU1), which provided  for the installation of a
new  water  supply   well   outside  of  the
contaminant plume and hookups for all affected
and potentially affected residents.  This ROD
addresses OU2,  the treatment of the ground
water  and containment  of  the contaminant
plume.    A  subsequent  ROD will address
remediation of the source of the contamination
onsite  (OU3).   The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water  are VOCs
including PCE, TCE, DCA, DCE, and TCA.

The  selected  remedial  action  for   this  site
includes  pumping  and  treatment of ground
water using  air stripping, followed by carbon
adsorption, if emissions are  above Clean Air
Act  levels, with onsite discharge  of treated
water to surface water; other discharge options
will  be  considered  as necessary,  including
offsite  discharge to a downstream wastewater
treatment  facility or  reinjection at  the  site,
depending on  the discharge  rate; and ground
water  and surface  water monitoring.   The
estimated  present worth cost for this remedial
action  is $2,065,000,  which includes an annual
O&M cost of $75,200 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water  will  be remediated  to  meet
SDWA MCLs, or to  an excess cancer-risk level
of 10"6 or  less, if no current  MCL exists for a
particular  contaminant.   Specific   goals  for
ground water include DCE 0.007 mg/1 (MCL),
PCE 5 ug/1  (proposed MCL), TCA  0.2 mg/1
(MCL), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL). Surface water must
meet Clean Water Act Federal  Water Quality
Criteria  (FWQO  including  PCE   0.8 ug/1
(FWQC) and TCE  2.7 ug/1 (FWQC) for both
water and fish ingestion.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  No institutional
controls are  planned at this time.   However,
future  need  for these  restrictions will  be
determined at the five-year review.

KEYWORDS:      Air   Stripping;    Carbon
Adsorption (GAC);  Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground  Water
Treatment; MCLs;  O&M; Onsite  Discharge;
PCE; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water   Act;    Solvents;    State
Standards/Regulations;   Surface   Water
Monitoring TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
                                            108

-------
       DOVER AIR FORCE BASE, DE
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 3,734-acre Dover Air  Force Base site is an
active  military base  in Dover,  Kent  County,
Delaware.  Surrounding land use is primarily
agricultural/residential, and wetlands associated
with stream floodplain areas are located onsite.
Since 1941, the base has operated as a military
air field  and  has served  several  different
functions   including   present    day   cargo
operations.     Hazardous  waste  has  been
generated   at   the  base   from  industrial
operations, fuels management, fire training,  and
pesticide use.  These wastes have been handled
in  various manners  since  1941,  including
disposal in onsite landfills and pits, use in fire
training  exercises,  and discharge to surface
drainage ditches.  A 1.3-acre area referred to as
Fire Training  Area  #3 (FT-3), located in  the
northeastern portion of the site, was  used to
conduct  fire  training exercises,  and currently
contains  several  waste  pits,  an  oil/water
separator,  dumpsters,  and  an  underground
storage tank used during  the exercises.  From
1962 until 1970, contaminated waste  oils  and
fuels were placed  on an old  aircraft or spread
in a pit and ignited for fire training  exercises
in FT-3.  Approximately 1,000 gallons of waste
material were  used  per  exercise, with   two
exercises being performed each week.   In 1970,
the original pit was  filled in, and a  new pit
was excavated.  Metal dumpsters  were placed
in the pit and  waste JP-4 fuel was ignited on
them   during  quarterly   training  exercises.
Drainage  from  the pit was  collected in an
underground  oil/water  separator,  and   was
removed from the site by  a waste oil recovery
contractor. An underground storage tank, used
to store JP-4 fuel used in  the  exercises,  and
underground pipes, also  are  located  near  the
pit.   Fire  training exercises  ceased  in 1989.
Investigations in 1989 by Dover Air Force Base
revealed the presence of  contaminated soil in
the pit area.   Residual  waste  fuel,  oil,  and
sludge  still remain in underground  piping,
creating  a fire and explosion hazard.  This
Record    of    Decision   (ROD)   addresses
remediation of soil and structures within  the
FT-3 area. Subsequent RODs will address other
sources of  contamination and  contaminated
ground water in other site areas.  The  primary
contaminants  of concern affecting the  soil,
sludge,   and   debris  are  VOCs  including
benzene, toluene, and xylenes; metals including
lead; and  oils.
The selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes removing residual liquids, sludge, and
solids  from the underground tank, oil/water
separator, and piping, and transporting these
materials  offsite  for  disposal; excavating the
underground   tank,   oil/water   separator,
dumpsters,  and piping,  and  decontaminating
them using high-temperature steam cleaning
equipment;  disposing  of  the  contaminated
steam  cleaning solution  and excavated debris
and structures offsite; backfilling and grading
excavated areas; and placing a revegetated soil
cover  over the  FT-3 area.   The  estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$100,000, which includes a  total O&M  cost of
$5,000  over 20 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific  cleanup  goals  were   not
provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.

KEYWORDS:       Benzene;   Carcinogenic
Compounds;   Clean   Air   Act;    Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain;  Landfill  Closure; Lead;  Metals;
O&M;  Offsite Disposal; Oils;  Onsite  Disposal;
RCRA;   Sludge;    Soil;    State
Standards/Regulations;    Toluene;    VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
            EAST MX. ZION, PA
        First Remedial Action - Final
                June 29, 1990

The  10-acre East Mt. Zion  site  is  a privately
owned,  inactive  landfill   in  Springettsbury
Township, York  County, Pennsylvania.  The
landfill is on  a  forested  ridge  along  with
recreational  park  lands  and  a   residential
subdivision.   From  1955  to 1972, domestic,
municipal, and industrial wastes were disposed
of onsite.   In 1969 and 1971, the landfill was
cited for improper disposal practices and was
subsequently closed by the State in 1972.  In
1983 and  1988,  State investigations identified
several  contaminants in onsite ground  water
and leachate.  This Record  of Decision (ROD)
addresses the ground water contamination by
inhibiting the mobility of contaminants  from
the landfill.   The  primary contaminants  of
concern affecting the ground  water are  VOCs
including  vinyl chloride and benzene.
                                              109

-------
The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes   capping   the  landfill  with   an
impermeable multi-layer  cap;  constructing a
passive  vent  system  to  control  methane
offgasses;  installing  surface   water  control
systems   for   the   cap;  allowing   natural
attenuation    to    reduce   ground   water
contamination to background levels; conducting
ground water monitoring to monitor  natural
attenuation of contaminants; and implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions,
and  site access  restrictions, such as fencing.
The  estimated present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial action is $2,230,000, which includes an
annual O&M cost for ground water monitoring.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Based  on  ground   water velocity  and  the
elimination  of  the  source,   ground  water
concentrations are expected to meet background
levels  within  five  years  through  natural
attenuation. Chemical-specific goals for ground
water include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), and vinyl
chloride 2 ug/1 (MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions will  be  implemented to  limit site
usage.

KEYWORDS:   Background Levels;  Benzene;
Capping;   Carcinogenic  Compounds;   Direct
Contact;    Drinking   Water   Contaminants;
Ground  Water;   Ground Water  Monitoring;
Institutional  Controls;  MCLs;  Metals;  O&M;
Onsite Containment; Safe Drinking Water  Act;
State  Standards/Regulations;   Surface  Water
Collection/Diversion; Venting; VOCs.
           FIKE CHEMICAL, WV
       Second Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The   11.9-acre   Fike   Chemical   site  is  an
abandoned chemical manufacturing facility  in
Nitro, West Virginia.  The site is  comprised  of
an  11-acre chemical  plant and  a  0.9-acre
Cooperative Sewage  Treatment  plant  (CST).
Onsite   features  include  several  chemical
production areas,  process control equipment,
various  onsite  structures,  drum and  waste
burial areas, over  400 storage  tanks, and 3
inactive waste lagoons. During operating years,
the  CST  facility   treated  the   sewage  and
industrial wastewater generated by the chemical
manufacturing   processes  and   onsite   truck
terminal operations.  The CST facility currently
treats  contaminated  storm  water generated
onsite.   From  1951  to  1988,  Fike  Chemical
manufactured   more  than   sixty   different
chemicals.  Hazardous wastes generated from
onsite operations were discharged onsite to the
nearby Kanawha River. In 1983, EPA identified
onsite  dioxin-contaminated soil.  In addition,
asbestos was found in several onsite structures
and  was used  as  insulation  for  onsite pipes,
tanks, and  cooling towers. A 1988 Record of
Decision  (ROD) addressed the disposal of bulk
chemicals stored in onsite tanks and drums.  In
1989, an  Explanation of Significant Differences
modified  the  1988  ROD, documenting  that
drum contents would not be consolidated prior
to disposal.   In 1990,  a  Focused Feasibility
Study (FFS) was completed by EPA to evaluate
remedial  alternatives for the tanks, equipment,
and structures.  This ROD addresses the tanks,
equipment, and structures evaluated in the 1990
FFS  report.  Future RODs will address  other
onsite areas of concern including contaminated
soil and sludge. The primary contaminants of
concern contained  in  the waste/debris include
organics and asbestos.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  removing 5.5 tons of  onsite asbestos
material  from various site areas; dismantling
and  decontaminating 400 onsite storage tanks,
approximately 130 pieces of equipment, and 39
buildings and disposing of the debris offsite;
treating  and  if  necessary,  discharging  the
decontamination fluids;  and implementing  site
access  restrictions  including fencing.   The
estimated present worth  cost for  this remedial
action  is $2,830,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost  of $5,200 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Any tanks, equipment, or structure identified as
a  safety  hazard  and  health risk and/or  an
obstacle   to   future   investigation   will   be
dismantled, decontaminated,  if necessary, and
removed to an offsite facility for disposal or
salvaging.  Any waste, which cannot be treated
onsite will  be removed to an  offsite facility for
treatment.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:        Asbestos;    Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act;  Clean Water Act;
Debris; Decontamination; Direct Contact; O&M;
Offsite  Disposal;  Offsite  Treatment;  Onsite
Discharge;  Onsite Treatment; Organics; RCRA;
State Standards/Regulations.
                                              110

-------
      GREENWOOD CHEMICAL, VA
            First Remedial Action
             December 29, 1989

The  five-acre  Greenwood Chemical site is a
former  chemical plant  in Newton, Virginia.
Adjoining lands to the  east, west, and south
are used for rural, residential, and agricultural
purposes, and the Blue Ridge Mountain Range
bounds the site to  the north.  Ground water is
used by all persons within a three-mile radius
for drinking  water purposes.    The   closest
residential well  is  within 400 feet of the site,
and   the   closest   downgradient  well   is
approximately 2,500 feet  from the site. The
chemical plant  was used primarily for  the
production   of    industrial,    pesticide,
pharmaceutical,  and  photographic  products
from  1947 until 1985,  and  produced  waste
solvents including  listed RCRA F002 and F005
wastes.   Plant operations were  terminated  in
April 1985,  after  a toluene  fire killed four
employees.   Contaminated  areas at the  site
include  seven   lagoons   used  to   store
wastewaters generated during plant operations,
and a buried drum area.  To mitigate  threats
due to contamination, EPA emergency response
activities were conducted between  1987 and
1988.    These   activities  included  removing
surface  drums  and other  stored chemicals;
excavating lagoon  sludge from  three lagoons
and  stabilizing  the  underlying  soil   before
disposing of the treated  soil  onsite in  a lined
vault  constructed in one  of the  lagoons; and
capping a lagoon. This operable unit addresses
approximately   1.5   acres    of   the   most
contaminated portions of the site including  the
contaminated soil associated with three of  the
former  lagoons, a  backfilled   lagoon now
referred to as the backfilled area, and contained
chemicals in the buildings.  A second operable
unit  will  address  the  remainder of the  site
including additional soil  and  sediment, and
ground  water underlying and downgradient of
the   contaminated  soil.      The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil  are
VOCs including  benzene, PCE, and TCE; other
organics including PAHs;  metals  including
arsenic; and other inorganics including cyanide.

The selected remedial action for  this operable
unit includes excavation and offsite incineration
of  approximately   4,500   cubic  yards   of
contaminated soil,  backfilling  with clean soil,
and revegetating; removal of chemicals  stored
in  onsite   buildings;   and  surface   water
collection/diversion    during   remedy
implementation.  The estimated present worth
cost  for this  remedial  action is  $8,787,900.
There are no O&M  costs associated with  the
remedial action for this operable unit.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Contaminated  soil will  be excavated to levels
where  leachate contamination  will  not raise
ground   water  levels   above the  associated
MCLs,  WQC,   or  health-based criteria.    For
individual contaminants in the soil, the cleanup
goals and  associated  target  criteria  include
benzene 0.83 mg/kg, TCE  0.13 mg/kg, PCE
0.07  mg/kg,  and  PAH 5,000 mg/kg.    The
cleanup level for arsenic was set at 25 mg/kg,
based on a non-lethal excess lifetime cancer risk
of 10-5

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Arsenic;  Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean  Air Act; Clean  Closure;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;  Excavation;
Filling;   Incineration/Thermal   Destruction;
Inorganics;  MCLs; Metals;  Offsite  Disposal;
Offsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCE; RCRA;
Soil;  Solidification/Stabilization; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Collection/Diversion; TCE; VOCs.
         HRANICA LANDFILL, PA
            First Remedial Action
               June 29, 1990

The 15-acre  Hranica Landfill site is an inactive
landfill 21 miles north of Pittsburgh, in Butler
County, Pennsylvania.   The site  is in  a rural
agricultural  setting with  4,000 people residing
within a  two-mile radius of the site. Between
1966 and  1974, both municipal and industrial
wastes were accepted onsite  including  paint
and  solvent  wastes,  plating  wastes,   metal
sludge,  and waste  oils.   The  wastes  were
incinerated  and/or  stored  onsite in  surface
impoundments until 1981.  Liquid wastes were
then   directly   discharged   into    surface
impoundments causing ground,  surface, and
soil   cover   contamination.     The   surface
impoundments were subsequently abandoned
and the wastes were then openly burned. The
residual ash from the incineration process was
stored onsite in unprotected piles.  Numerous
drums of unprocessed wastes were also staged
onsite  without further treatment.   In  1983,
removal   activities   were  performed   which
included  removing and disposing of more than
                                             111

-------
19,000  drums  and  4,000  cubic  yards  of
contaminated soil; incinerating oil and paint
sludge and  consolidating the  incinerator  ash
onsite; and  capping the site.   Although  the
removal  action  reduced  the  extent  of  the
contamination,  further  site  studies  revealed
elevated levels of contamination in the  ash pit
area, the landfill, and the former drum  storage
areas.   This  first  operable  unit Record  of
Decision addresses the soil contamination in the
ash pile area and other areas  where the lead
concentration exceeds the background range.
The primary contaminant of concern affecting
the soil is lead.

The  selected  remedial   action for  this  site
includes repairing the 29,000-square foot  ash
pile  cover,  capping other  areas  where lead
contamination  exceeds 300 mg/kg; monitoring
ground water and surface water; implementing
site access restrictions and institutional controls
including land and ground water use and deed
restrictions;  and performing a ground water
verification  study  to  determine  whether  any
ground water  remediation is necessary.   The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action  is $1,037,000, which includes an annual
O&M of  $81,450 for year 0-1  and $30,550 for
years 2-30.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
By repairing the  ash cover and  capping  the
lead-contaminated   areas   exceeding   lead
300 mg/kg,  the remedial action will reduce the
Hazard Index to below the target of 1.

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions  including  water  and  land  use
restrictions will be implemented.

KEYWORDS:   Background  Levels;  Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Direct  Contact;
Closure   Requirements;   Ground   Water
Monitoring;  Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals;
O&M;  Onsite Containment; RCRA; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations;   Surface    Water
Monitoring.
 KEYSTONE SANITATION LANDFILL, PA
            First Remedial Action
             September 30, 1990

The 40-acre Keystone Sanitation Landfill site, an
inactive,  privately owned  landfill, is in Union
Township,   Adams   County,   Pennsylvania.
Surrounding land use is primarily  agricultural
with scattered residences.  From 1966 to  1990,
the unlined landfill accepted household  and
municipal wastes  as well as  industrial  and
construction   debris,   including
phosphorus-contaminated sand, potato sludge,
resin sludge, incineration ash, and dried  latex
paint.  The volume of non-homogeneous waste
at the site currently is 1.7 million cubic yards.
In 1982, State investigations  revealed onsite
ground   water    contamination   and   a
contaminated onsite residential well attributable
to leachate from the landfill contents.  In  1984,
EPA found low-level  contamination in nearby
residential wells.   As a result of the  ground
water contamination, EPA  ordered Keystone to
install an onsite spray irrigation system and a
leachate collection system to prevent migration
of contaminants offsite.    This  Record  of
Decision (ROD) addresses  Operable  Unit  1
(OU1), the containment of onsite  source area
and remediation of onsite contaminated ground
water.  A subsequent ROD will address offsite
ground water contamination in monitoring and
residential   wells   (OU2).     The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water  are  VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride; other  organics
including  acids  and phenols;  and  metals
including chromium and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating approximately 4,150  cubic
yards  of  contaminated  surface  soil  with
consolidation of the soil in the landfill; placing
a  cap  on   the   landfill  and  subsequent
revegetation; installing an  active gas extraction
system  to  collect  gases   emitted  from the
landfill; pumping  and  treatment of  ground
water    using    equalization,
flocculation/precipitation,   filtration,   ion
exchange,  air  stripping,  and  filter   press
technologies, followed by offsite disposal of any
sludge   produced   by   these   processes;
discharging  the  treated  water  onsite  to  a
surface  stream;  monitoring  ground water,
surface  water, and  sediment;  installing  an
in-home water treatment system for the onsite
resident;  and  implementing   site  access
restrictions and institutional controls, including
deed, land use, and ground water restrictions.
The  estimated present worth  cost  for  this
remedial action is $9,156,950, which includes an
annual O&M cost of $217,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
No chemical-specific cleanup goals were stated
in the  ROD.   For  carcinogenic compounds,
                                             112

-------
cleanup goals were established to reduce the
excess lifetime cancer risk to 104 to 10"6.  For
non-carcinogenic  compounds,  the goal  is  a
Hazard  Index  (HI)  equal  to  1  or  less.
Individual ground water remediation standards
are based  on the more stringent of  SDWA
MCLs or non-zero MCLGs, or State background
levels. If these levels cannot be met, the ROD
will be amended.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed, land use,
and  ground  water  use restrictions  will  be
implemented.

KEYWORDS: Acids; Air Stripping; Background
Levels;   Benzene;   Capping;   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Excavation;  Ground
Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure; Lead;  MCLs; MCLGs;  Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal;  Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge;  Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCE; Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil;  State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Monitoring; TCE;  VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria.
       LORD SHOPE LANDFILL, PA
        First Remedial Action - Final
               June 29, 1990

The  25-acre  Lord Shope Landfill site  is an
inactive hazardous waste  landfill in  Girard
Township,    Erie   County,    northwestern
Pennsylvania.   The site consists of a  4-acre
landfill and adjacent areas of contaminated soil,
surface  water  and  ground  water.    The
surrounding area  is primarily agricultural and
residential, with two unnamed tributaries of Elk
Creek bordering the site to the north and west.
From the mid-1950s to  1979, industrial wastes,
including spent adhesives, degreasing solvents,
acids, caustics, and some drummed  wastes
were disposed of  onsite from nearby facilities.
During  1982  and  1983, responsible  parties,
under   an   agreement  with   the   State,
implemented a  remedial  alternative,   which
included removing 81 exposed drums, capping
the landfill,  and installing a low  permeability
ground  water cutoff wall to reduce leachate
production  from  the landfill and  to  divert
ground  water flow around the site.   Landfill
leachate has, however,  resulted  in VOC and
inorganic ground  water contamination both
beneath and to the north of the landfill, with a
contaminant  plume  migrating  towards  the
north.  Surface soil around the landfill has also
been found to contain elevated levels of VOCs.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the landfill material,  surrounding  soil, and
ground water are  VOCs including benzene,
PCE, and TCE; and metals  including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes in-situ vapor stripping using vacuum
wells  to volatize and remove VOCs from the
landfill material  and  the  surrounding soil;
collection  and  treatment  of gas   emissions
generated  by the vapor stripping process using
carbon filtration; ground water pumping and
treatment  including  pretreatment  for  metal
removal,   followed  by air stripping, to halt
plume migration, with final discharge of treated
ground  water  into   the   nearby  surface
tributaries;  implementation  of  site   access
restrictions and institutional  controls including
ground water use  restrictions.  The  estimated
present worth cost for the remedial action is
$5,760,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $420,000 for years 0-2,  and  $310,000  for
years 3-50.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific  soil criteria for the landfill
material and the  surrounding soil  were  not
provided,  but will  be  determined during the
remedial   design and will be based on  soil
contaminant levels  that will not significantly
impact the underlying ground water.  Ground
water cleanup goals will meet SDWA MCLs or
proposed  MCLs (PMCLs), and  a 10"* excess
cancer  risk or a Hazard  Index  = 1.  Target
ground water  cleanup  levels  include  PCE
5 ug/1 (PMCL),  TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), benzene
5 ug/1 (MCL),  arsenic 20 ug/1 (based on an
excess  cancer risk  of 10"*), chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL),    and   lead   15 ug/1    (risk-based
calculation).   Ground  water goals  will be
revised  to  meet  background  levels   in
accordance with State ARARs.  Air emissions
from  the  air stripping of the ground  water
treatment  system and the gas released from the
in-situ  vapor  stripping process will  be treated
to meet State standards.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Ground water
use restrictions will be implemented  to prevent
permitting and construction of ground  water
wells in the contaminated  plume area.
                                             113

-------
KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon   Adsorption   (GAC);  Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact;   Ground  Water;   Ground   Water
Treatment;  Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
Metals;   O&M;   Onsite   Discharge;  Onsite
Treatment;  PCE;  Plume Management;  RCRA;
Safe  Drinking   Water   Act;   Soil;   State
Standards/Regulations;   TCE;   Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs.
       M.W. MANUFACTURING, PA
          Second Remedial Action
               June 29, 1990

The  15-acre  M.W. Manufacturing site  is  a
former  copper recovery  facility  in  Montour
County,  Pennsylvania,  two  miles  north  of
Danville.   The  Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation (PennDOT) maintains a storage
area  immediately  north  of the  site,  and
farmlands and wooded lots are adjacent to the
site on the  west and  south.   Mauses Creek
flows in a  southerly direction past  the  site.
Several private residences, motels, gas stations,
restaurants, and a Head Start school are located
just north of the  Penn DOT  storage area  and
rely on private ground water wells for drinking
water. From 1966 to 1972, M.W. Manufacturing
was  engaged  in secondary  copper  recovery
from  scrap  wire, using both  mechanical  and
chemical processes.  Granular carbon wastes
generated  by  the  chemical  process  were
dumped onsite, and spent solvents and acids
were  allegedly disposed of onsite.   In  1972,
M.W. Manufacturing filed for bankruptcy and
the Philadelphia  National  Bank acquired the
property.  Warehouse 81, Inc., acquired the site
in 1976 and unsuccessfully attempted to recover
copper  from  the  large  waste piles of fluff
material   (fibrous   insulation    materials
contaminated with  metals and solvents).  The
initial  remedial investigation revealed several
areas posing potential threats to public health:
the carbon  waste pile, four wire-fluff waste
piles, a surface impoundment, a buried lagoon,
and  contaminated  soil, drums  and  storage
tanks.   A 1989 remedial action addressed the
concerns for direct contact with, and  migration
of contaminants from, the carbon waste pile by
excavating  the   carbon  waste   pile   and
incinerating the  waste  offsite.   This second
remedial  action   addresses  the  remaining
principal  threats  at the site  by treating the
onsite  waste  and  contaminated  soil.    A
subsequent   remedial   action  will   address
possible remediation of contaminated  ground
water and offsite  soil, sediment, and  surface
water   contamination.       The    primary
contaminants  of  concern  affecting the  soil,
debris, and lagoon water  are VOCs including
PCE and TCE; other organics including PCBs;
and metals including lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for this  site
includes excavation and onsite  incineration  of
approximately 32,000 cubic yards of  fluff waste,
followed   by    stabilization    of   the
lead-contaminated  ash and offsite disposal  of
residual ash; excavation and onsite incineration
of  approximately  13,000  cubic  yards   of
contaminated   soil,   followed  by   onsite
stabilization,   as   necessary,   before   offsite
disposal;  backfilling  and capping the  soil
(landfill closure) under the fluff waste piles;
covering the soil not under the fluff  piles using
hybrid closure (topsoil cover and revegetation);
onsite treatment of approximately 86,000 gallons
of lagoon water using carbon adsorption and
metal removal, followed by onsite discharge to
surface  water;  and   onsite  incineration  of
approximately  40  cubic  yards  of  waste
contained  in  tanks and  drums,  followed by
stabilization of the ash and offsite disposal; and
ground  water monitoring.    The   estimated
present  worth cost for this remedial action is
$35,950,000, which  includes an estimated annual
O&M  cost  of  $39,000   and  an  additional
estimated  $20,000 every 5  years.

PERFORMANCE   STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Action  levels have  been  established   for
soil/waste based on a 10"6 cancer risk  level  or
an HI of 1.0, where technically feasible. If soil
cannot be feasibly  cleaned to the 10"6 risk level
(e.g., excessive volume of  contaminated soil in
one particular area onsite), cleanup  will reduce
the additional incremental risk to the ground
water to 10"1  levels or to MCLs, whichever are
more stringent.   Chemical- specific  cleanup
levels for  soil, fluff waste, and drummed and
tanked wastes were provided for eight indicator
contaminants  including PCE,  TCE, PCB, and
lead.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:    Benzene; Capping;  Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean  Air  Act;  Clean  Water Act;  Closure
Requirements;  Debris; Dioxin;  Direct  Contact;
Excavation;     Ground   Water   Monitoring;
Hybrid/Alternate Closure;  Incineration/Thermal
                                              114

-------
Destruction;  Landfill  Closure;  Lead;  Metals;
O&M;   Offsite   Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; PCE; RCRA;
Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface  Water;  Surface
Water  Treatment; TCE;  Treatability  Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
         OSBORNE LANDFILL, PA
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 15-acre Osborne Landfill site is an inactive
abandoned coal strip mine in  Pine Township,
Mercer County, Pennsylvania.  The site is in a
semi-rural  area  with  a  large natural  pond,
woodlands, and wetlands bordering the site to
the west.   The  shallow  Clarion aquifer is
present  east of the strip  mine highwall.  The
portion of the aquifer that formerly overlaid the
site was excavated  during stripping activities.
After  the mine was abandoned, the strip  mine
pit filled with ground water.   From  the late
1950s  to 1978, contaminated spent foundry sand
and other industrial and municipal wastes were
disposed  of  into  the pit.    Other  wastes
including trash and drums containing solvents,
wastewater, and  coolants, were  disposed  of
onsite, gradually filling  the strip mine and
displacing  the water.    The  site  holds  an
estimated 233,000 cubic yards of fill material.
In 1983, Cooper  Industries, an operator of the
site,  removed approximately  600 drums  of
waste and 45 cubic yards  of soil from the site
and installed  a  fence to restrict site  access.
EPA has divided the remedial action into five
operable units. Operable Unit 2 (OU2), which
addresses contaminated wetland sediment, and
OU5,   which  addresses   the  contaminated
Homewood  aquifer will be implemented in a
subsequent Record  of  Decision  (ROD).   This
ROD  addresses  the  remaining three operable
units.  OU1 addresses  solid waste fill material
including foundry sand and other onsite  pond
sediment, OU3 addresses  leachate  associated
with the onsite water table, and OU4 addresses
the Clarion aquifer.  The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the sediment and ground
water are VOCs including benzene and  TCE;
other  organics including PCBs and PAHs; and
metals including arsenic, chromium, and  lead.

The selected remedial action  for this site is
comprised  of  three  operable  units.    The
primary remedy  for OU1  includes constructing
a slurry  wall barrier around  the  perimeter of
the fill, constructing a  clay cap  over the fill
material, ground water pumping and treatment
using equalization, pH  adjustment,  chemical
precipitation, clarification, sand filtration, and
carbon adsorption,  followed by injection into
the onsite mine pit; offsite disposal of ground
water   treatment   residues;   ground  water
monitoring;  and  implementing   institutional
controls  including  deed  restrictions.     A
contingency  remedy   for  OU1   will  be
implemented if performance standards cannot
be met during the pre-design stage of remedy
implementation and includes regrading the site,
excavating and placing solid waste in a RCRA
Subtitle-C onsite  landfill; long-term  ground
water    monitoring;   and    implementing
institutional controls.  If  the primary remedy
for OU1 is implemented,  no additional action,
other than the primary OU3 remedy of ground
water monitoring, is necessary for OU3.  If the
contingency remedy for OU1 is implemented,
the contingency remedy for OU3 also must be
implemented.   The contingency  remedy  for
OU3  includes  dewatering the  site  during
excavation;  isolating  the fill  area  from  the
onsite mine pools;  treating the ground water
using  equalization,  clarification,  and  sand
filtration  for  solids removal,   and  carbon
adsorption  for organics  removal, followed by
onsite discharge; and ground water monitoring.
The selected remedy for OU4 includes pumping
and treatment of ground  water in the Clarion
Formation   using  air  stripping,  onsite  air
emissions treatment, onsite injection of treated
ground  water, and ground water monitoring.
The estimated  present  worth  cost  for  the
primary remedies is $18,681,000 with an annual
O&M cost  of $904,000  for 30 years.  If  the
contingency remedies  are implemented,  the
estimated  present  worth  cost  is  $17,811,000,
which  includes an  annual  O&M  cost of
$940,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
The selected source remedy will not reduce the
current level of contamination in the fill area,
but will maintain an average PCB concentration
level of 23 mg/kg.   EPA's PCB  Spill Cleanup
Policy for a  reduced access area is met by this
alternative. Ground water contaminants will be
remediated to the following background levels:
TCE 0.2 ug/1, benzene 0.2 ug/1, PCBs 1  ug/1,
chromium 50 ug/1, lead 15 ug/1,  and arsenic
22 ug/1.   If any ground water contaminants
exceed SDWA MCLs or MCLGs,  the remedy
will continue until these goals are  met.
                                             115

-------
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:      Deed
restrictions will be  implemented  to reduce
exposure to the site.  The State has required
that  mining within a 1/2-mile  of the site be
restricted.

KEYWORDS:      Air  Stripping;   Arsenic;
Background Levels; Benzene; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium;  Clean  Water  Act; Contingency
Remedy;  Direct   Contact;   Drinking  Water
Contaminants;  Excavation;   Offsite  Disposal;
Ground  Water; Ground Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Lead; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals;  O&M; Onsite
Containment;   Onsite   Discharge;   Onsite
Treatment; Organics;  PAHs;   PCBs; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment;  Slurry   Wall;   Solvents;   State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toxic Substances
Control Act; VOCs.
              RAYMARK, PA
           First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  7-acre Raymark site  is  an active metal
manufacturing and electroplating plant in the
Borough of  Hatboro,  Montgomery  County,
Pennsylvania.  The site is in an  industrial area
and is approximately 100 feet  from the nearest
residence.    The  nearest  surface  water  is
Pennypack Creek,  which  flows  4,000  feet
southwest of the site.   As part of the rivet
manufacturing process  at  the  plant,  VOCs,
including 30  to 40 gallons of  TCE, were used
daily at  the site to clean and degrease metal
parts.  In 1979, when EPA  discovered TCE  in
the Hatboro  public  water  supply wells, the
Hatboro  Borough  Water Authority removed
these wells from operation, and supplemented
the water supply using an interconnection with
a neighboring water company.   Further EPA
site investigations from 1980 to  1987 identified
TCE in soil and other wells onsite and adjacent
to the  property  and  seem  to  indicate  that
contaminants from the site may have  been  at
least a contributing source of  contamination  in
the downgradient public water supply wells.
Other  chemical  contaminants  identified   in
samples  from the public water supply wells,
including TCA, did not seem to originate  at
the site, thus  indicating several distinct sources
for this contamination. In 1987, the site owners
agreed to install ground water treatment units
with air stripping towers, and, as necessary, air
emission control units, at two Hatboro public
supply  wells  to  return  these  to  routine
operation.   This Record of  Decision  (ROD)
addresses contaminated drinking water and
ground   water,  which  are  referred  to  as
Operable  Units 2  and  3  (OU2  &  OU3),
respectively.   The soil/source contamination
(OU1), will be addressed in a subsequent ROD.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including TCE and
PCE.

The  selected  remedial  action for   this site
includes   continuing   the   operation   and
maintenance of the Hatboro public supply and
the existing air stripping towers at the wells
and the installation of  new vapor phase carbon
adsorption units; completing  a ground  water
remedial  design  study to   determine the
number,  location,  and  construction of  new
extraction wells with corresponding installation
and  implementation;   onsite  pumping  and
treatment of  ground  water  with air  stripping
and vapor phase carbon adsorption units with
onsite  discharge  to   Pennypack  Creek; and
implementing  institutional  controls.    The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,700,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $125,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The  ground  water  will be  remediated until
contaminant   levels   reach   SDWA   MCLs,
non-zero  MCLGs,   or  background  levels,
whichever are more restrictive.  The residual
excess cancer risk resulting from site-related
contamination will be reduced to a  10"* level
and non-carcinogenic levels  will be reduced to
a  Hazard  Index  =   1.    Chemical-specific
standards    for    ground    water   include
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL) and PCE 5 ug/1  (proposed
MCL).    Additional  still-undefined, aquifer
contamination  at  the  site   may   make  it
technically impracticable to  attain  these levels,
and if so, an ARAR waiver will be enacted and
the ROD amended.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls will  be implemented  to restrict access
to the contaminated aquifer.

KEYWORDS:    Air  Stripping;  Background
Levels; Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground  Water; Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
                                            116

-------
MCLs; MCLGs; O&M; Onsite  Discharge; PCE;
RCRA;   Safe   Drinking  Water   Act;   State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;    Treatment
Technology; VOCs.
    SAND, GRAVEL AND STONE, MD
           Second Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 200-acre Sand, Gravel  and Stone site is a
former sand and gravel quarry three miles west
of the  town  of Elkton,   in  Cecil  County,
Maryland,  along a  tributary to Mill  Creek.
Surface water in Mill Creek eventually flows to
the  Elk  River  and  the   Chesapeake  Bay.
Beginning  in 1969, hazardous materials  were
disposed of onsite.  In 1974, a pool of chemical
waste burned in an onsite fire, the cause of
which has yet to be determined.  Subsequently,
200,000 gallons  of  this  liquid  waste  were
removed   to  an  offsite   landfill  and  the
remaining  drums  and  sludge  were  buried
onsite  in  two  excavated  pits  (eastern  and
western).   The  site has been  separated  into
three operable units (OUs).  A 1985 Record of
Decision   (ROD)   addressed   OU1,   the
remediation   of   shallow   ground   water
contamination near the eastern excavated pit,
source control (i.e., removal of buried drums),
and site access  restrictions.   This ROD  focuses
on OU2, the threat posed by soil and  ground
water contamination migrating from the eastern
portion of the  site,  including remediation of
ground  water   contamination  in  the  lower
aquifers   if   needed,   and  evaluation  of
contaminant   sources    near   the   western
excavation pit.    Soil sampling  analyses  and
geophysical studies now show that there are no
unacceptable risks associated with soil in the
western area of the site.  A future ROD will
address OUS,  the  contaminated soil,  source
control, final site  closure, and  post-closure
operation   and   maintenance activities.    The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground  water  are  VOCs  including benzene,
TCE, toluene and xylenes; and metals.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes   onsite  and  offsite  ground   water
monitoring.     If  this   monitoring   data
demonstrate  that  remediation  is  required,
ground  water may be treated either onsite, or
offsite at point of use, and  bottled  water will
be  supplied   to  affected  residences   and
businesses.    The  onsite   treatment   system
installed as a result of the first remedial action
would be expanded and modified, as necessary,
to treat the ground water in the lower aquifer.
Treatment  measures  may  utilize  granular
activated carbon, air stripping, ion exchange, or
any  combination  of  these  techniques.   The
estimated present  worth cost  of this  remedial
action ranges  from  $702,000 to  $7,125,000,
depending on  the  extent   and  nature  of
treatment required, and  an  annual O&M cost
ranging from $102,000 to $625,900 for  30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Action   levels    that    will   trigger    the
implementation of onsite and/or offsite ground
water  treatment  include  concentrations  of
chemicals of concern  in excess  of MCLs, a
cumulative carcinogenic risk in excess of 104, or
a non-carcinogenic  Hazard Index greater  than
1.0.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   ACL; Air Stripping;  Benzene;
Carbon  Adsorption   (GAC);   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Ground  Water;  Ground Water  Monitoring;
Ground  Water  Treatment;  MCLs;  MCLGs;
Metals;  O&M;   Offsite  Discharge;  Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
RCRA;   Safe   Drinking  Water   Act;  State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;    Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
           TYSON DUMP #1, PA
           Third Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The   4-acre  Tyson   Dump   #1   site   is  an
abandoned septic and chemical waste disposal
area in Upper Merion Township,  Montgomery
County, Pennsylvania.  The site  consists of a
series  of  abandoned  unlined lagoons  in  a
former sandstone quarry, and is  bordered by
unnamed tributaries to the Schuylkill River on
the east  and west, and a railroad switching
yard to the north.  Beyond the railroad yard is
a floodplain/wetlands area and the Schuylkill
River,   which   flows   southeast    toward
Philadelphia.  The river is the main source of
drinking  water in the area.  Barbadoes Island
lies in the center of the river in the site vicinity
and is used as an electrical substation. From
1960 until 1973, the privately  owned  site  was
used  for  the  disposal  of liquid  septic tank
wastes, sludge, and chemical wastes that were
hauled onsite in bulk tank trucks.   In 1973, the
                                             117

-------
State  ordered  the site  owner to  close  the
facility.  In 1983, EPA required that immediate
removal   measures   be   taken,   including
constructing a leachate collection and treatment
system  with drainage controls, covering  the
site, and implementing site access restrictions.
In 1984, the first Record of Decision (ROD) for
the site  was issued for Operable Unit 1  (OU1),
which documented  a remedy  that  included
excavation  and  offsite  disposal   of  lagoon
materials.  In 1988, a second ROD was signed,
which documented a remedy for  treating  the
ground  water contamination under the offsite
areas  (OU2), including the railroad  yard and
wetlands areas, using steam stripping followed
by  liquid-phase  carbon   adsorption  as   a
polishing step.  This third ROD addresses OU3,
the further  remediation  of the contaminated
ground  water  that  has  migrated  under  the
Schuylkill River.   Additional ground water
investigations  will be conducted on the north
side of  the  river,  and based on the results,  a
fourth operable unit may  be  identified.  The
primary contaminants  of concern affecting the
ground  water are VOCs including toluene and
xylenes.

The   selected  remedial  action  for   this  site
includes installing additional recovery wells on
the south bank of the  Schuylkill River and on
Barbadoes Island,  followed  by treating  the
contaminated  ground  water  at  the  existing
treatment  facility  on  the  south  bank  of  the
river;  expanding the capacity of  the existing
treatment  facility; investigating hydrogeologic
conditions on the north side of the river to
assess environmental  impact and the need for
additional    RODs;   and   implementing
institutional controls to  restrict ground water
use.   The  estimated present worth cost for  this
remedial action is $10,100,000, which includes
an annual O&M cost of $834,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Discharge limits for treated ground water were
calculated by  the  State based on  risk factors,
dilution within the river, and State and Federal
standards.  These limits  are toluene  1.52 mg/1
(based on a chronic WQC of 0.33 mg/1) and
xylenes 0.97 mg/1  (based on an   MCL  of
10.0 mg/1).

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:  Ground water
use on Barbados Island and on the north side
of the river within the  contaminated ground
water plume will be restricted.
KEYWORDS:       Air   Stripping;   Carbon
Adsorption  (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Water Act; Direct  Contact;  Floodplain;
Ground  Water;  Ground   Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Onsite  Discharge;  Onsite Treatment;  Plume
Management;   State   Standards/Regulations;
Toluene; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
            U.S. TITANIUM, VA
        First Remedial Action - Final
             November 21, 1989

The  175-acre  U.S.  Titanium  site,  in Nelson
County, Virginia, is a  former  titanium dioxide
manufacturing plant which was  operated from
1931 to 1971. The facility has  had a succession
of owners and  is  currently  owned by U.S.
Titanium Corporation.  Approximately 50 acres
of the site will be addressed  by this remedial
action, including seven  waste  storage  areas
containing process wastes.  These seven areas
include:  Area 1, a burial pit containing  16,000
cubic yards of solid  ferrous sulfate (copperas);
Area 2, a  former copperas stockpile area; Area
3, an evaporation pond;  Area 4, a 1-acre ore
waste  pile;  Area   5,  sedimentation  ponds
containing fine-grained sediment composed of
unreacted ore, filter cake,  and  gypsum; Area 6,
a settling  pond used to recover phosphate ore;
and  Area 7, a drainage area, which received
surface water runoff.  Several  of these areas lie
within the 100-year floodplain  of the nearby
Piney River.  After a large fish kill in 1979, the
State   ordered  U.S.  Titanium  to  bury  the
copperas waste from Area 2 by December 1980.
The copperas waste  was collected and buried in
Area  1, the onsite burial  pit.  A supplemental
remedial investigation  revealed the presence of
acidified   soil  underlying the  waste storage
areas  that  contributes  to  ground   water
contamination.   The primary  contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, ground  water, and
surface water are metals including arsenic and
chromium;  and  other  inorganics  including
acids.

The  selected remedial activities for the  seven
areas within this site include: Area  1, in-situ
dissolution of copperas waste  and treatment of
resulting leachate using physical and chemical
processes;  Areas  2,  3,  4, and 5, diversion of
surface water  flow using  drainage  controls
followed   by  revegetation;  and   Area  7,
excavation and neutralization of acidified soil,
followed  by placement of the mixed material
                                              118

-------
around  a  wetland that  will be constructed
onsite.  Area 6 requires no remedial  action.
Ground water will be collected passively using
subsurface drains and  trenches and  treated
passively  in  an  oxidation/settling pond, a
constructed    wetland,    and   a   limestone
neutralization bed. The oxidation/settling pond
will  be capable of completely  removing  iron
and  sulfur elements from the collected ground
water and will  make up for any loss in  the
performance   of  the   wetland.     Wetland
vegetation and anaerobic bacteria will  remove
iron  and sulfur  species  from the water.  As a
result of this process, an increase in pH can be
expected.  The limestone bed will act as a final
polishing  step  for pH  adjustment  before  the
effluent is discharged to the Piney River.  The
estimated  present worth cost for this remedial
action  is  $5,895,000,  which  includes  present
worth O&M costs  for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Action  levels   for  in-situ  dissolution  and
leachate collection for Area 1 will ensure  that
leaching of contaminants to ground and surface
waters  will  not exceed  State   water  quality
standards which include arsenic 0.19 mg/1 and
chromium  0.011 mg/1.    Effluent  limits  for
discharge  from  the  ground water  treatment
system  into  the surface water  include  iron
97,583 mg/1 and pH ranging from 6.0 to 9.0

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Local  deed
restrictions may be  implemented to prohibit
excavation at any of the contaminated areas
and   at   the  wetland  area  that  will  be
constructed onsite. Site access restrictions will
also  be implemented around the wetland.

KEYWORDS:     Acids;  Arsenic;   Capping;
Chromium;  Excavation;  Floodplain;  Ground
Water; Ground  Water  Treatment;  Inorganics;
Institutional   Controls;   Landfill    Closure;
Leachability   Tests;    Leachate
Collection/Treatment;  Metals;  O&M;   Offsite
Discharge; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Soil;    Soldification/Stabilization;
State/Standards/Regulations; Surface   Water;
Treatment Technology.
          WALSH LANDFILL, PA
            First Remedial Action
                June 29, 1990

The 7-acre Walsh Landfill site encompasses an
approximately 1.5-acre landfill and surrounding
area   in   a   heavily   wooded   region   of
Honeybrook    Township,   Chester  County,
Pennsylvania.   The landfill reportedly received
mixed municipal  and  industrial  wastes  for
disposal between 1963 and  1976, although State
investigations in 1979 revealed that disposal of
hazardous waste at the  site had resumed after
that   period.    Investigations  by   the  State
revealed   the  presence  of  fifteen  to twenty
drums containing various hazardous substances,
including VOCs.    Fumes from the  drums
reportedly sickened local residents, and organic
and  inorganic  compounds were  detected in
monitoring  wells  and  private wells.    In
addition  to  waste  disposal,  open burning of
material  was  conducted  in the southeastern
portion  of  the  landfill.    Residential  well
sampling  from 1987 through 1989  resulted in
an interim remedial measure in 1989 to provide
bottled water to 44 residences.   Currently, the
site is being operated as a  solid waste transfer
station and  salvage yard,  and operations  are
increasing  the  volume  of  landfill/junkyard
debris, and  the overall  size of the site.  This
Record  of  Decision (ROD)  addresses final
source control  for the landfill and allows for
expedited action on the contaminated drinking
water supply.   A second ROD will address the
contaminated  ground water.   The primary
contaminants  of concern  affecting  the  soil,
sediment,  and  ground   water  are  VOCs
including benzene,  PCE,  and  TCE;   other
organics including PAHs; and metals including
arsenic and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  removal  of  bulky items and  debris
from the landfill surface for resource recovery,
followed  by construction of an  approximately
5.2-acre landfill cap; provision  of an alternate
water supply to approximately 50 residences by
extending the municipal water system; ground
water    monitoring;    and    implementing
institutional controls including land use, ground
water use, and deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions.  The estimated present  worth cost
of this  remedial action is $3,768,000,  which
includes  an estimated  annual  O&M cost of
$63,090 for 25  years except years 5, 10,  15, 20,
and 25, which will have an estimated  O&M
cost of $108,950 due to  the five-year reviews.
                                             119

-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Provision  of  an alternate water  supply  will
ensure availability of water  meeting SDWA
MCLs.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls including land use, ground water use,
and deed restrictions will be implemented.

KEYWORDS:  Alternate Water Supply; Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Closure Requirements; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water  Contaminants;  Ground  Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLs;  Metals;  O&M;  Onsite Containment;
Organics;  PAHs; PCE;  Sediment;  Soil;  State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
              WESTLINE, PA
     First Remedial Action (Amendment)
              March 30, 1990

The Westline site is a former chemical plant in
the rural community of Westline,  LaFayette
Township, McKean County, Pennsylvania. The
site  is situated along Kinzua  Creek and  is
completely  surrounded  by  the  Allegheny
National  Forest.  From 1901 to  1952, the Day
Chemical Company plant  was operated  to
convert  lumber  to charcoal,  methanol,  and
acetic  acid.   The  Day  Chemical  Company
deposited  tar  material  containing  phenolic
compounds and PAHs into onsite lagoons and
into  small canals  to allow the tar material  to
migrate downhill towards the banks of Kinzua
Creek. In 1983, EPA conducted an immediate
removal action to remove 2,000 tons of tar and
contaminated soil from the largest lagoon of tar
deposits.   Although a 1986 Record of Decision
(ROD)  addressed  the  remediation  of  an
additional 2,340 tons of tar and soil found  in
an onsite tar pit and in some of the interpersed
tar deposits along Kinzua Creek, there was still
an estimated 4,000  tons of tar material left at
the site  in the areas  planned for excavation.
Most of  the  remaining tar, however, is three
feet  below the surface  and is  not a dermal
contact threat.   Based on  an updated risk
assessment using  more recent risk criteria for
PAHs, EPA has determined that  the residual
soil  and  tar material presents no  potential
carcinogenic  risk   greater  than  the range  of
acceptable risks found at other Superfund sites
and  will  thus discontinue excavating soil and
tar material.  This ROD amends a July 1986
ROD,  which called for the excavation and
offsite  incineration and  disposal of waste tar
from an onsite tar pit and the interspersed tar
deposits along Kinzua Creek.   There are no
longer  any primary  contaminants  of  concern
affecting the soil at the site.
The  selected  remedial  action  for this  ROD
amendment is no further action.  Because some
tar  material  will  remain  onsite, EPA  will
monitor  the   site  to   prevent  unacceptable
exposure from the waste tar, and  a  five-year
review will be  scheduled.   No  costs  were
specified for this no action remedy.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:     No   Action  Remedy;  ROD
Amendment.
                                             120

-------
                           RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 4
                       (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
                          North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee)
         62nd STREET DUMP, FL
        First Remedial Action - Final
               June 27, 1990

The 5-acre 62nd Street Dump site is an inactive
industrial   waste  disposal  area  in  Tampa,
Hillsborough County, Florida.   Several marsh
areas and a series of fish breeding ponds  lie
adjacent to the site.  Surrounding land use is
mixed light industrial and  residential.  The site
overlies a series of sedimentary rock aquifers,
which are  currently used as  drinking  water
sources. In the mid-1970s, the site was used as
a sand borrow pit. After this operation halted,
industrial   wastes,   including  auto   parts,
batteries, and  kiln dust were  dumped onsite.
Industrial   dumping  ceased  in  1976,  but
unauthorized onsite dumping  of construction
materials and household garbage continued.  In
1976, fish kills occurred in the adjacent ponds,
which lead to site investigations in 1979 and
1980  by private  groups.   Based  on  these
investigations,    the    contamination   was
determined to be the  result  of waste  material
leaching from the landfill.  Several  additional
investigations  were conducted from  1983  to
1989  to  identify and  further  characterize
contaminant sources and  contaminated media.
This  Record  of  Decision  (ROD)  addresses
source  remediation  and  onsite  and offsite
ground water  contamination.    The  primary
contaminants  of  concern affecting  the  soil,
debris,  and  ground   water  are   organics
including PCBs; and metals  including arsenic,
chromium,  and lead.

The  selected  remedial action for  this site
includes   dewatering   and   excavating
approximately   48,000   cubic   yards   of
contaminated  soil  and   non-cement debris,
followed   by   onsite   treatment    using
solidification/stabilization,  and  placing  the
treated  material  onsite  within the  original
dump  area;   capping  the   site  with   an
impermeable membrane  and  vegetative soil
cover;  pumping  and  onsite treatment  of
contaminated  ground water using  chromium
reduction,  flocculation,  sedimentation,  and
filtration, followed by offsite  discharge  to  a
publicly owned treatment works (POTW)  or
onsite discharge to surface water; disposing of
residual  sludge  onsite;  monitoring  ground
water; and implementing institutional controls
including land use restrictions.  The estimated
present  worth cost for this remedial action is
$16,460,000,   which  includes  an  estimated
present  worth O&M  cost of $690,000 for 30
years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Federal   MCLs   were  chosen   as   cleanup
standards for ground water.  Chemical-specific
goals include chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL)  and
lead 15 ug/1 (proposed MCL).   Soil cleanup
criteria  were chosen  as the more stringent of
health-based  criteria or values calculated from
a leachate model.  Chemical-specific  goals for
soil   include  PCBs   0.33 mg/kg,    arsenic
3.5  mg/kg,  chromium 8.8 mg/kg,  and  lead
17.4 mg/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:    Land  use
restrictions will be implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:  Arsenic; Capping;  Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium;  Clean  Water  Act;
Debris;   Direct   Contact;   Drinking   Water
Contaminants;  Excavation;   Ground  Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;   Ground  Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal;  Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCBs;  Publicly  Owned    Treatment  Works
(POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;  Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization;   State
Standards/Regulations;    Toxic    Substances
Control Act; Treatability  Studies; Treatment
Technology; Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
       BYPASS 601 GROUNDWATER
          CONTAMINATION, NC
            First Remedial Action
              August 31, 1990

The  Bypass 601 Groundwater  Contamination
site,  is  in  Concord,  Cabarrus County,  North
Carolina. One of the potential sources of onsite
contamination is  the 13-acre  Martin  Scrap
Recycling Facility  (MSR)  facility,  an inactive
battery   salvage   and  recycling   operation.
                                             121

-------
Ground water at the site has also been found
to be  contaminated  with  heavy  metals  by
several unknown sources.   The MRS  Facility
consists of two tracts of land; the larger tract
includes a main facility  that was used for lead
reclamation activities;  and  the  second  lot
encompasses  the  floodplain   area.     The
immediate area  surrounding the MSR  Facility
is commercial,  light  industrial and residential
with 1,400  persons  residing within a  3-mile
radius  of  the   site.    The Main  Facility  is
comprised   of   several    lead-contaminated
buildings  including  a  scale  house,  several
garages and sheds, as a  result of onsite battery
cracking   operations.    Contaminated   debris
including old tanks, drums, wires, casings, and
trash is spread  throughout the  Main  Facility
area.   The  southeastern corner of  the Main
Facility has been backfilled with cracked battery
casings to a depth of 20 feet.  Approximately
57,000  cubic yards of lead-contaminated  soil
remains onsite  from previous battery  salvage
activities.  A 1984 EPA site investigation found
high levels  of  metals in nearby wells.  This
Record of Decision (ROD)  addresses Operable
Unit 1 (OU1),  which will  contain  the  source
contamination  from the   MSR  facility   to
minimize  the continued  degradation of ground
water  and surface water.   Subsequent RODs
will address the final action and remediation of
other onsite contaminant sources (OU2)  and
ground water   contamination  (OU3).    The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and debris  are metals including chromium
and lead.

The selected remedial action for this site is an
interim action, which includes demolishing and
disposing of debris from four onsite buildings;
excavating and consolidating the contaminated
surface soil; regrading the site,  covering with
area with 6 inches of clean fill, covering  the
soil  with a HPDE  liner,  with  18  inches  of
drainage soil and 6  additional inches of clean
topsoil;  revegetating   the  area;  backfilling
excavated areas, realigning an adjacent stream
to  minimize   the   erosion   of   the   cap;
maintaining the soil cover;  and enacting public
awareness   programs;   and   implementing
institutional controls  including deed restrictions
and  site access restrictions including  fencing.
The present worth cost for  this remedial action
is $738,821, which includes an  annual O&M
cost of $9,700.
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil contaminated with lead will be remediated
to 500 mg/kg (EPA Interim Guidance).

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:        Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS:
Capping;    Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Debris;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Institutional Controls;  Interim Remedy;  Lead;
Metals;  O&M;  Onsite Containment;  Onsite
Disposal;  Soil; State Standards/Regulations.
           CABOT/KOPPERS, FL
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The  99-acre Cabot/Koppers site is a pine tar
and  charcoal generation facility in Gainesville,
Alachua County, Florida.  The site is underlain
by shallow and intermediate aquifers. Land in
the  site vicinity is used  for commercial and
residential  purposes.  The site is comprised of
2  distinct  areas, the  inactive  Cabot  Carbon
property to the southeast, and  the industrial
zoned and currently operating Koppers area to
the west.  North Main Street borders the entire
site to the west as does a drainage ditch, which
drains into nearby Springstead  and Hogtown
creeks.    Pine tar and  charcoal  generation
operations began at the Cabot Carbon  facility
in  the  early 1900s  and  generated a  large
number of blended  solvents as by-products.
Resultant  wastewaters were treated onsite in a
lagoon.   The Koppers  portion  of  the site has
been operated since 1916 as a wood preserving
operation,  primarily   for  utility   poles  and
timbers.  The main processing facilities at the
Koppers area include a tank farm, a  former
cooling  water  pond,   cylinder drip tracks,  a
wastewater management system comprised of
a  north and south lagoon, a wood shavings
pile, and drying kilns. Between 1980 and 1989,
various site  investigations by  the  State, EPA
and private parties identified soil contamination
in the three lagoons, the inactive cooling pond,
the  drip  tracks,  and a wood  shavings pile.
Ground water contamination also was identified
in both  the onsite shallow  and  intermediate
aquifers.    In addition, in  1986  the  State
identified   organics    and    heavy    metal
contamination in offsite soil west  of the site.
This Record  of  Decision  (ROD)  addresses
contaminated onsite  soil and ground water.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
                                              122

-------
the soil and ground water are VOCs including
benzene; other organics including oils, phenols,
and PAHs;  and metals  including arsenic and
chromium.

The  selected  remedial   action  for  this site
includes excavating 6,400 cubic yards of onsite
contaminated soil  from  the  north  and  south
Koppers lagoon areas, treating the soil  using
soil washing and bioremediation if necessary,
followed by solidifying/stabilizing the residual
material and disposing of these residuals onsite;
treating soil from  the cooling pond and drip
track areas by in-situ bioremediation; lining the
North  Main Street  ditch to  prevent  further
discharge of leachate  (if the  ditch is to remain
intact);  pumping  and  treatment  of  ground
water  followed by  offsite  discharge  to  a
publicly  owned  treatment   works  (POTW);
operating and  maintaining   the North  Main
Street lift station as needed  until  the  ground
water    remediation   system   renders   it
superfluous;  monitoring  ground  water  and
surface  water; and implementing institutional
controls  including  land  use restrictions.   The
estimated present worth  cost for this remedial
action is $4,192,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $388,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific   soil  cleanup  goals  were
developed based on  ground water protection
and  include carcinogenic PAHs 0.59  mg/kg,
phenols  4.28 mg/kg, arsenic  27 mg/kg, and
chromium  92.7 mg/kg.     Chemical-specific
ground   water   cleanup    goals    include
carcinogenic  PAHs 0.003 ug/1 (health-based),
phenols 2,630 ug/1, arsenic 50 ug/1, chromium
50 ug/1  (MCL), and benzene 1 ug/1  (State).
Total noncarcinogenic risk will result in a HI <
1.0.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls including land use restrictions will be
implemented to prevent exposure  to onsite
contamination.

KEYWORDS:       Arsenic;    Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application: Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Chromium;   Direct   Contact;
Excavation;  Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;    Ground    Water    Treatment;
Institutional    Controls;    Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; Metals;  O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Oils; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs;  Phenols;  Publicly
Owned   Treatment   Works  (POTW);  Safe
Drinking  Water Act; Soil Washing/Flushing;
Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; Surface Water
Monitoring; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
          CITY INDUSTRIES, FL
        First Remedial Action - Final
               March 29, 1990

The City Industries site is a former hazardous
waste   recycling   and   transfer  facility   in
Goldenrod Township, Orange County,  Florida,
near the cities of Winter Park and Orlando.
The city of  Winter Park's water supply well
field is located approximately 1,900 feet west of
the site.  These  wells draw  from  the deep
Floridan aquifer,  which  is  separated  from a
surficial aquifer by a  140-foot-thick  confining
layer. In 1971, a former fuel oil business at the
site  was  developed  into  a   waste-handling
facility.     Activities   at  the   site  included
receiving,  handling, storing, reclaiming,  and
disposing    of  various   waste   chemicals.
Improper  disposal  practices and intentional
dumping led to onsite soil and surficial ground
water contamination.   In  1983, after the State
ordered  the  business closed,   the  site  was
abandoned.  The  State subsequently removed
the onsite waste  drums, some contaminated
soil, and waste sludge. In 1984, EPA removed
and   thermally   treated   1,670   tons    of
contaminated soil  and disposed  of the residuals
onsite.  Additionally,  EPA removed  180 cubic
yards   of   highly  contaminated  soil  and
transported  the soil to  an  offsite hazardous
waste landfill.   This Record  of Decision (ROD)
addresses  contaminated ground  water, which is
migrating  through  the   surficial aquifer, a
potential drinking water source, and prevention
of  contaminant  migration  to  the   deeper
Floridan aquifer.  The primary contaminants of
concern affecting  the ground water are VOCs
including  benzene, PCE, TCE, and toluene.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this   site
includes pumping  and  treatment of  ground
water using air stripping, followed by offsite
discharge  to a  publicly owned treatment works
(POTW),  if   treatability  studies show   the
discharged water meets pretreatment standards;
and  ground  water  monitoring.  If  a local
POTW will  not accept the  treated effluent, a
contingency  remedy will  be instituted, which
includes ground water pumping and  treatment
using air  stripping followed by precipitation,
filtration,  carbon   adsorption,   and   possibly
biological  oxidation;   conducting treatability
                                             123

-------
studies to ensure compliance with surface water
discharge criteria; and discharging the treated
effluent  off site to  a  nearby  drainage  canal.
Both  the selected  and  contingency  remedies
include implementation of institutional controls,
including land use  and deed restrictions,  and
securing    construction   rights-of-way    and
easements at the site.  The estimated present
worth cost for the  selected remedial  action  is
$4,575,632, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $292,500 for 15 years. The estimated present
worth cost for  the  contingency  remedy  is
$4,262,101, which includes present worth O&M
costs of $2,849,191 for 15 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
The surficial aquifer  is a potential source of
drinking water,  therefore,  contaminant  levels
must  be  reduced to drinking water standards,
including benzene  1.0 ug/1  (State   drinking
water standard), PCE 3.0 ug/1 (State  drinking
water standard), TCE 3.0 ug/1 (State  drinking
water  standard),   and   toluene  2,000 ug/1
(Proposed MCLG).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use   restrictions,  as  well  as   construction
easements  and  other rights-of-way,  will  be
implemented.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption; Carcinogenic Compounds;  Clean
Air   Act;  Clean   Water  Act;   Contingency
Remedy;  Direct  Contact;   Drinking  Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Ground    Water   Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLGs; MCLs;  O&M;
Offsite   Discharge;  Onsite  Treatment;  PCE;
Plume Management; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;    Toluene;
Treatability Studies; VOCs.
        COLEMAN-EVANS WOOD
             PRESERVING, FL
  First Remedial Action  - Final (Amendment)
             September 26, 1990

The  11-acre Coleman-Evans Wood  Preserving
site is a former wood treatment facility, which
was  operated from 1954 to the  late 1980s,  in
the community of Whitehouse, Duval County,
Florida. The surrounding land use is primarily
residential and light commercial/industrial, and
there are  approximately 1,000 local residents
who rely exclusively on ground water for their
drinking water supply. The site is divided into
2 areas, including a wood treatment facility on
the western portion of the site, and a landfill
area used for disposal of wood chips and other
facility wastes on the eastern portion  of the
site. In addition  to the treatment and storage
areas  there is an onsite  drainage  ditch that
carries site runoff into nearby McGirts  Creek.
Prior to 1970, wastewater from the facility was
precipated   and  discharged  to  the  onsite
drainage ditch.  The  precipitated sludge was
deposited  into  two  unlined pits  until  1970,
when the sludge  was stored in tanks.   The
wastewater   treatment   process   was   also
enhanced in 1970  with lime  precipitation and
chlorination.   In  1980, onsite  ground  water
contamination  was  detected  and  activated
charcoal filters  were  added  to  the  treatment
process to  remove  organics.   The  primary
contaminant in onsite soil and ground water
has been identified as pentachlorophenol (PCP).
The highest areas of PCP concentration were in
the vicinity of onsite chemical  tanks and the
unlined pit areas.  In  1985, EPA conducted an
emergency response, which included excavating
and disposing of pit material offsite and filling
excavated areas with clean fill. PCP-laden fuel
is thought  to be floating on the water table
surface;  however,  only  limited  low,  level
ground water contamination has been detected
onsite. This Record of Decision (ROD) amends
a 1986 ROD, which documented the selection of
incineration for an estimated  9,000 cubic yards
of  contaminated  soil.    Since  that   time,
additional studies during the remedial  design
phase  indicated  that  there are approximately
27,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil.  Based
on the excessive  volume of soil and  the high
cost of incineration, treatability studies were
conducted  and an alternative  source control
treatment   was   selected.     The  primary
contaminants  of   concern  affecting the  soil,
sediment,   and  ground  water  are  organics
including PCP and metals.

The selected amended remedial action for this
site includes excavating  approximately  27,000
cubic yards of soil and sediment contaminated
with PCP  levels  greater than 25 mg/kg, and
pre-treating these materials using soil washing;
separating    clean   soil    fractions   from
contaminated  soil fines and woody  wastes,
followed by  solidification/stabilization of any
soil fines  or  sludge,  which exceed cleanup
criteria; placing  a cover over  the solidified
mass; replacing the solidified soil and  sludge
onsite; treating  residual soil wash water using
                                              124

-------
bioremediation,   followed   by   a   granular
activated polishing unit with subsequent onsite
discharge to the drainage ditch; pumping and
recovering ground  water  to  facilitate  soil
excavation, followed by onsite treatment using
the GAC adsorption unit, if PCP levels exceed
1.0 ug/1, and  using chemical precipitation for
metals removal  prior  to discharging ground
water to the onsite drainage ditch; covering the
area  with   vegetation;  and   implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions,
and site  access restrictions including fencing.
The estimated total cost for  this remedial action
is   $8,567,304.    There  are  no  O&M  costs
associated with this remedy.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil contaminated  with PCPs  greater  than
25.0 mg/kg will  be excavated  and treated to
the established cleanup level below 25 mg/kg.
After  bioremediation,   solidified/stabilized
contaminant   fines   will   meet   Toxicity
Characteristic  Leaching Procedure Criteria of
3.6 mg/kg.   Ground water recovered during
soil dewatering will be treated to below PCP
1.0 ug/1 (State).
INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:       Biodegradation/Land
Application;   Carbon    Adsorption   (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact;  Excavation; Ground  Water; Ground
Water    Treatment;   Institutional   Controls;
Leachability  Tests;  MCLs;  Metals;   Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; RCRA; ROD Amendment;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil; Soil
Washing/Rushing;  Solidification/Stabilization;
State   Standards/  Regulations;  Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology.
       DUBOSE OIL PRODUCTS, FL
        First Remedial Action - Final
               March 29, 1990

The  20-acre Dubose Oil  Products  site is an
inactive waste storage, treatment, recycling, and
disposal facility  in  Cantonment,   Escambia
County,  Florida.    Surrounding  land  use  is
primarily rural agricultural.  The site overlies a
deep aquifer, which serves as a  drinking water
source for area residents.  Site operations began
in 1979, and  included  thermal  treatment of
waste oil, petroleum refining wastes, oil based
solvents, and wood treatment wastes; steam
heating of  spent iron/steel pickle liquors; and
rock salt filtration of waste diesel fuel.  Liquid
waste was transferred  from tanker  trucks and
drums  to  onsite  treatment tanks  for  these
processes.  Empty drums were either sold  or
crushed and  buried onsite.  Operations ceased
in 1981, and the site owner commenced closure
of  the  site  without  a  proper  closure plan.
Unauthorized  closure   activities    included
excavation  of  buried  drums (causing  some
drums  to  be  punctured), operation  of  an
aeration  system to  remediate onsite drainage
ponds, and movement of contaminated material
with heavy  equipment.   A State  emergency
response action in 1985 included  excavation
and onsite vaulting  of 38,000 cubic yards  of
contaminated soil  and the offsite disposal  of
onsite  drums.    Site  investigations in 1988
identified the  soil  containment vault as the
principal  contaminant  source and  revealed
contamination above health-based levels of the
shallow  aquifer beneath the site,  in  onsite
surface  water,  and sediment.   Investigations
showed  that  the  deep  aquifer   contained
extremely  low  to   undetectable   levels   of
contaminants, which were below drinking water
standards.    This Record of  Decision  (ROD)
addresses final  remediation of source areas and
onsite  shallow  ground  water.  The primary
contaminants of  concern  affecting  the soil,
sediment, ground water,  and surface water are
VOCs  including benzene,  TCE, toluene,  and
xylenes;  and other organics including PAHs
and phenols.

The selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating the top 20  feet of vault soil
containing    low-level   contamination   and
disposing of soil  in an onsite  ravine area;
excavating the remaining vault soil and treating
by  aerobic  biodegradation,  which  includes
windrowing of  soil on a concrete slab, addition
of microbial  seed and  nutrients, and aeration;
disposing of treated soil onsite  in  the  ravine
area; placing a two-foot soil  cover  over the
vault area  and the ravine  area;  treating soil
leachate  from the windrowing process using
filtration and either carbon adsorption or UV
oxidation  followed  by  onsite  discharge   to
surface  water;  draining  and filling of onsite
ponds; installing surface  water runoff controls;
conducting ground water and  soil monitoring;
restoring ground water by natural attenuation;
and  implementing   institutional    controls
including  deed   and   ground  water  use
restrictions.  The estimated present  worth cost
                                             125

-------
for  this remedial action  is $3,008,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $115,000 for
years 0 to 5 and $10,000 for years 6 to 10.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup  standards for leachate discharge are
based on the more stringent of Federal or State
ARARs  and  include  benzene 1 ug/1 (State),
TCE 3 ug/1 (State), xylenes 50 ug/1  (State), and
PNAs  10 ug/1  (EPA detection limit).   Soil
cleanup goals are based  on  either leaching
potential (LP) or health-based criteria (HBC)
and  include benzene 10 mg/kg (HBC),  TCE
0.050 mg/kg (LP), xylenes 1.5  mg/kg (LP), and
PAHs 50 mg/kg (LP).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:    Deed  and
ground   water   use  restrictions  will  be
implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:       Aeration;    Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land   Application;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation;  Filling;  Ground  Water;  Ground
Water   Monitoring;   Institutional  Controls;
Leachate Collection/Treatment; MCLGs; MCLs;
O&M;   Oils;  Onsite  Containment;   Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act;   Sediment;    Soil;    Solvents;    State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water  Collection/Diversion;   TCE;  Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Water  Quality
Criteria; Xylenes.
     HARRIS/PALM BAY FACILITY, FL
            First Remedial Action
               June 28, 1990

The 345-acre Harris/Palm Bay Facility site is an
electronics  manufacturing company  in  Palm
Bay, Brevard  County,  Florida.  Surrounding
land  use  is  commercial,  residential,  and
industrial.  The site overlies an unconsolidated
aquifer, which is  used  by a public wellfield
located south of and downgradient of the site.
From the 1950s to 1967, the site was operated
by an electronics firm when Harris Corporation
purchased   the   facility.    Current   facility
operations are subdivided into the Government
Systems operations area and the Semiconductor
Complex area.  In 1981, EPA identified  VOCs
in ground  water  wells located  south of  the
Government  Systems  facility.   Ground  water
contamination was attributed to  several  onsite
incidents at  the  Government Systems plant
including  two  fires,  which  resulted  in  the
dumping   of  chemical   vats,   a   broken
acid/solvent line,  and spillage at drum  storage
areas.   Seepage  from two  former treatment
lagoons may also be a  source  of  a  shallow
contaminant   plume.     In   1985,   Harris
constructed a treatment facility to implement an
onsite ground water treatment and monitoring
program which is  still  in  operation.   This
Record  of  Decision (ROD) addresses ground
water   contamination  at  the   Government
Systems  facility.   A subsequent  ROD will
address the contaminated ground water at the
Semiconductor  Complex  and   all  of  the
contaminated  onsite  soil.     The primary
contaminants of concern  affecting the ground
water  are  VOCs   including   TCE;   metals
including   chromium  and  lead;  and  other
inorganics including fluoride.

The selected  remedial   action   for  this  site
includes continued ground water pumping and
treatment using air stripping to  remove VOCs;
using the treated ground water as industrial
process water  then  reinjecting  the  treated
ground water onsite into  a deep aquifer; and
evaluating  and modifying the existing  ground
water monitoring  program to fully characterize
onsite  contamination.   The estimated  present
worth cost for this remedial action is $1,430,000,
which  includes a  total O&M cost of $950,000
for five years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
The goal of this  remedial action is to restore
the  aquifer to its  beneficial  use.   Cleanup
standards were chosen as the more stringent of
State   or   Federal    SDWA    standards.
Chemical-specific  ground  water  goals  include
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL),
and lead 15 ug/1  (proposed MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:  Not provided.

KEYWORDS:    Air  Stripping;   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium;  Clean  Air  Act; Clean
Water  Act;  Direct Contact;  Drinking  Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring;   Ground    Water    Treatment;
Inorganics; Lead;  MCLs;  Metals; O&M;  Onsite
Discharge;   Onsite  Treatment;  RCRA;  Safe
Drinking    Water    Act;   Solvents;    State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
                                             126

-------
       HIPPS ROAD LANDFILL, FL
 First Remedial Action (Amendment) - Final
             September 21, 1990

The  7-acre  Hipps  Road  Landfill  site  is an
inactive landfill in Jacksonville, Duvall County,
Florida.    Surrounding  land  use  is  rural
residential.  The  site overlies a  sedimentary
surficial aquifer system, used as  a source of
drinking water, which has  been affected by the
site.  Prior to the start of landfilling operations
in  1968, the  site was a cypress swamp.   Types
of  hazardous waste disposed of onsite included
cans of TCE and  artillery rounds from U.S.
Navy facilities.  After onsite operations ceased,
the property was divided  into lots,  and five
homes   were  constructed on  the   landfill.
Subsequently, biota  in an  adjacent  pond died,
and  area  residents began  to  complain  of
deteriorating well water quality. In 1983, State
investigations confirmed the presence of ground
water contamination, and  bottled  water was
supplied    to   the   affected   residents.
Consequently  in  1985,   area  homes  were
connected to the municipal water supply.   In
1989, remedial actions stemming from  a 1986
Record of Decision  (ROD) commenced, and
included   properly  closing  the  landfill and
implementing   institutional  controls.      In
addition, the 1986 ROD documented ground
water pumping and treatment at a publicly
owned treatment works (POTW) as part  of the
overall site remedy.  In 1990, the landfill was
capped   to  control  the   source  of  the
contamination.  Ground water investigations
after 1986 revealed that  the ground  water
contaminantion plume was not  as extensive,
and  the  overall  site quality  was better than
previously estimated.  This ROD amends  the
1986 ROD for the ground water component.
The primary contaminants of  concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including benzene;
and metals including chromium and lead.

The 1986 selected ground water remedial  action
included  ground water pumping,  followed by
offsite  discharge to  a POTW for treatment.
This amendment provides for onsite ground
water treatment using air  stripping to remove
VOCs,  followed by onsite  discharge  of  the
treated water to a storm water retention  basin,
and  monitoring of  onsite  and offsite ground
water.    This amendment will  substantially
decrease  the overall  cost of the remedy from
that of the POTW treatment alternative.  The
estimated present worth cost for this amended
remedial action is $1,242,000, which includes an
O&M cost of $370,600 for five years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup standards were chosen
as the more stringent of State standards or
Federal MCLs.   Chemical-specific goals for
ground water include benzene 1 ug/1  (State),
chromium 50 ug/1  (MCL), and lead 15 ug/1
(Federal Recommended Cleanup Goal).   Lead
and chromium contamination  were determined
to be non-site related, but cleanup goals will be
met in water discharged to the retention basin.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls, which were  implemented  as part of
the  1986 ROD, include ground water and land
use restrictions.

KEYWORDS:     Air   Stripping;   Benzene;
Chromium;  Clean Air Act; Clean  Water Act;
Ground Water;   Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Lead;  MCLGs; MCLs; Metals; O&M;  Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; ROD Amendment;
Safe    Drinking    Water    Act;    State
Standards/Regulations;   Treatability  Studies;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
      HOWE VALLEY LANDFILL, KY
        First Remedial Action - Final
            September 28, 1990

The  11-acre Howe  Valley Landfill  site is  an
inactive  landfill  in  Howe  Valley,  Hardin
County,  Kentucky.    A  Class  IIA  aquifer
underlies the site, but is not currently used as
a drinking water source. Ground water flow is
southeasterly toward  Boutwell  Spring  and
Linders Creek.  From 1967 to  1976, 2.5 acres of
the site were used  for disposal of refuse and
manufacturing by-products.   In  1974,  a State
inspection revealed that  acidic liquid  wastes
were being dumped directly into the landfill, in
direct violation  of the  solid-waste disposal
permit issued.  Although the permit expired in
1974, the landfill continued dumping operations
until 1976.  In 1988, EPA required the removal
of 9,150 full or partially filled drums containing
metal plating sludge, caulk, flammable silicone
polymers, and paint-like pigments; 1,621 empty
drums; 6,000 smaller containers; and 3,000 cubic
yards of loose  waste from  the  site.   State
investigations in 1987 found that the potential
migration of this waste posed a drinking water
                                             127

-------
hazard. Contaminant levels for the underlying
ground water  system  cannot accurately  be
monitored because of the karst topography at
the site.   This  remedial  action  focuses  on
reducing  the  source  contamination.    The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil  are VOCs including PCE;   and metals
including chromium.

The  selected  remedial  action  for   the  site
includes excavating  approximately 100 cubic
yards of soil from the outlying areas of the site
containing elevated inorganic levels,  followed
by disposal  offsite; excavating approximately
7,400   cubic  yards   of  soil  with   elevated
concentrations of organics, followed by aeration;
performing a treatability study to ensure  that
an onsite aeration process will reduce organic
concentrations in soil to acceptable levels; onsite
disposal  of  the  treated   soil;  onsite   air
monitoring; installing water diversion ditches to
prevent water from running  onto  the aerating
soil; covering the area with soil and installing
a  vegetative   cover  over   the   entire   site;
monitoring ground  water at Boutwell Spring
and  at  additional  springs   or   wells;  and
implementing  institutional controls,  such as
deed restrictions, to  limit the property  and
ground water usage.  If the  treatability study
indicates that soil aeration will not effectively
reduce  contamination  to protective  levels,  a
proposed contingency remedy  would include
excavating,   stockpiling,   and    transporting
approximately    7,500    cubic   yards   of
contaminated soil to an offsite RCRA-approved
landfill for disposal.   The estimated present
worth  cost of the primary remedial  action is
$394,524, which includes a total O&M cost of
$42,625 for five years.  The estimated present
worth  cost  of  the  contingency  remedy is
$3,852,000, which includes a total O&M cost of
$42,625 for five years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Health-based soil  action  levels  have  been
calculated for the site-specific conditions,  and
include PCE  7.50 rng/kg and  chromium  (VI)
400 mg/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:      Deed
restrictions  will  be  implemented   to  limit
property and ground  water usage.

KEYWORDS:   Aeration; Air Monitoring; Air
Stripping;   Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water  Act;
Contingency   Remedy;   Direct   Contact;
Excavation;    Ground   Water    Monitoring;
Institutional  Controls; Metals; O&M;  Offsite
Disposal;  Onsite  Disposal; Onsite  Treatment;
PCE;  RCRA; Safe Drinking  Water  Act;  Soil;
State  Standards/Regulations; Surface  Water
Collection/Diversion;    Treatability   Studies;
VOCs.
           JADCO-HUGHES, NC
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The  6-acre  Jadco-Hughes  site  is  a  former
solvent  reclamation and  waste storage facility
in North  Belmont,  Gaston  County,  North
Carolina.  The surrounding area, along with
portions  of  the  site,  contains  woodlands
interspersed  with industrial  and  residential
developments.  Two unnamed tributaries that
flow through the site ultimately empty into the
Catawba  River,  which  is the  predominant
public  drinking water supply  source  for  the
area.  Ground  water is not used as drinking
water onsite, but offsite residents who do  not
yet have  municipal  water connections  utilize
this  ground  water for their drinking water
source.   From 1969  to  1975,  the  plant  was
operated  to  reclaim  used waste  paint  and
ink-type solvents.  In addition,  the plant  area
was  used  to store drummed wastes, including
waste   chemicals   and   sludge  from   area
industries.   In  1975,  the  State ordered  the
cleanup of two in-ground solvent pits and the
consolidation and covering of contaminated
surface  soil  in  an  onsite  landfill  in   the
southwest portion of  the site.   In 1983, all
remaining storage tanks, a mobile tanker, and
drums  were  removed  from  the   site.    In
addition,  responsible  parties   are  currently
leading the  remediation  of PCB-contaminated
soil  in  a  southeastern  area of  the site,  also
known  as the  "swale" area.  This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses the remediation of
remaining   contaminated   soil   and    the
contaminated ground  water and surface water.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, ground water, and surface water are
VOCs including benzene,  PCE,  TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; other organics including PCBs and
phenols;  and    metals    including   arsenic,
chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this   site
includes soil  venting  followed by vacuum
extraction and  carbon adsorption  to  remove
VOCs and other organics; flushing  the treated
                                              128

-------
soil, then collecting and treating the residual
water  in  a ground  water treatment system;
collecting ground water with a subsurface drain
system; pumping  ground water  from  highly
contaminated areas followed by  pretreatment
using aeration and carbon adsorption to reduce
VOC concentrations  and  subsequent  offsite
discharge to a publicly owned treatment works
(POTW);  conducting  a  treatability  study to
ensure compliance with POTW  pretreatment
standards;  replacing an  onsite surface  water
culvert; monitoring ground water and surface
water;  sampling  soil   and   sediment;  and
implementing institutional  controls,  including
land and ground  water use restrictions.  A
contingency remedy has also been prepared for
this  site  in the  event that a POTW  will not
accept the discharge  from the site  within  a
reasonable  time  frame.    The  contingency
remedy includes ground water pumping  and
treatment using  ultraviolet  oxidation followed
by  discharge to  an  onsite  tributary.    The
estimated present worth  cost  for this remedial
action   is   $4,830,900,   which   includes  an
estimated  present  worth   O&M  cost  of
$2,665,600  for   30  years.    No  costs  were
provided for the contingency  remedy.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
The  goal of this remedial action  is to restore
ground water to  its beneficial use as a potential
drinking water source.  Both soil and ground
water  cleanup  goals   were developed  to
remediate  and  protect  the  ground   water.
Chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil include
PCBs 10.0 mg/kg (TSCA), arsenic 48.0 mg/kg
(background),    chromium   140.0 mg/kg
(background), and  lead 1.3 mg/kg.  Treatment
goals for ground water include benzene 1 ug/1
(State), PCE 0.7 ug/1 (State), phenols 4,200 ug/1
(RfD), TCE 2.8 ug/1 (State), toluene 1,000 ug/1
(State), xylenes 400 ug/1 (State), arsenic 50 ug/1
(State), chromium 50 ug/1 (State), and lead
15 ug/1  (Recommended Cleanup  Goal  for
Superfund  sites).

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls including  land use and ground water
use restrictions will be implemented.

KEYWORDS:  Aeration;  Arsenic; Background
Levels; Benzene; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds;  Chromium;  Clean
Water Act; Contingent Remedy; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water  Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground   Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
MCLGs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment;  Organics;  PCBs; PCE;  Phenols;
Publicly  Owned  Treatment  Works  (POTW);
RCRA;  Safe Drinking Water Act;  Soil;  Soil
Washing/Flushing;    Solvents;   State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water  Monitoring;  TCE;   Toluene;  Toxic
Substances  Control Act;  Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction; Soil
Venting; VOCs; Xylenes.
     KASSOUF-KIMERLING BATTERY
               DISPOSAL, FL
       Second Remedial Action - Final
               March 30, 1990

The  Kassouf-Kimerling  Battery  Disposal  site,
formerly known as  the  Timber Lake  Battery
Disposal site and the 58th Street Landfill, is in
Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida within a
100-year floodplain area.  The site consists of a
42,000  square   foot  landfill  area  with  an
estimated landfill volume of 11,350 cubic yards.
The  site  is bordered  by  small  lakes  and
marshes to the  north, east, and west.  Surface
water flows from the west marsh to the east
marsh by way  of a  canal which cuts through
the  site, connects  the  marsh areas,  and
eventually discharges into the Palm River.  In
1978, empty battery  casings were deposited in
previously   excavated   onsite   areas,   and
contributed  to  the release of  metals into the
landfill.  Storm water running eastward off of
the landfill drained  into the wetlands, and the
dense wetland vegetation has contributed to the
retention of heavy metal  contamination.  The
first  Operable Unit  (OU1) Record of Decision
(ROD) addressed remediation of landfill wastes
and  contaminated underlying soil.  This ROD
addresses contamination of wetlands adjacent to
the  landfill.   The  primary  contaminants of
concern  affecting the  sediment  and  surface
water are metals including arsenic, chromium,
and  lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for the  site
includes dredging   15,000  cubic  yards  of
contaminated sediment  in the canal that lies
within 150 feet  of the landfill, and marsh area
sediment within 20  feet of the landfill to  a
depth of 2  feet;  solidifying and stabilizing the
sediment and disposing of the treated sediment
onsite  along with  the treated landfill  wastes
from OU1;  covering  the  area  with  soil;
implementing engineering controls on the canal
to flood the wetlands year  round; wetlands
                                             129

-------
mitigation;  and ground  water monitoring.  A
waiver  will  be  invoked  for  surface  water
because of the  negative impact  that  further
remediation would  have on  sediment in the
wetlands area and the potential for mobilization
of lead  beyond the site areas.  The estimated
present  worth cost for this remedial action is
$511,700, which includes a  total O&M cost of
$99,500.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Marsh sediment within  20  feet of the landfill
and sediment  in  the canal  within 150 feet of
the landfill will be remediated  to  achieve
Federal   Ambient  Water   Quality  Criteria
(FAWQC)  and include lead  40  mg/kg.   A
waiver  of  the  FAWQC  will be  imposed on
marsh sediment greater than 20 feet away from
the landfill and  sediment in  the canal greater
than 150 feet away from the landfill.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:     ARAR   Waiver;   Arsenic;
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Chromium;  Clean
Water  Act;   Direct    Contact;   Dredging;
Excavation;    Floodplain;   Ground    Water
Monitoring; Landfill Closure; Lead;  MCLs;
MCLGs; Metals;  O&M;  Onsite Containment;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe
Drinking    Water    Act;    Sediment;
Solidification/Stabilization;   State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Collection/Diversion;  Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands.
          LEWISBURG DUMP, TN
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 19, 1990

The 20-acre Lewisburg  Dump  site includes a
4-acre  abandoned  landfill developed in  an
abandoned   6-acre   limestone  quarry   in
Lewisburg, Marshall County, Tennessee. Land
in the  vicinity of the site  is primarily used as
farm and  pasture land.  There  are four public
water wells located within one-half mile of the
site. This municipally-owned and operated site
began  landfilling operations between 1963 and
1969, and  a variety of residential and  industrial
wastes, including solvents and  metallic wastes
were landfilled onsite.   Some municipal waste
was burned onsite, and the resulting ash was
placed in  the dump.  Soil samples taken from
various test  pits  during  State investigations
showed elevated levels of metals and organics
onsite.  In addition, a 2-acre quarry pond was
suspected to be contaminated  when  oil and
other debris were seen floating on  its  surface
and gas bubbles were observed in the absence
of any aquatic  life.   In 1973, the State found
that the old quarry  was in violation of recent,
more stringent  State environmental laws, and
concluded that landfilling operations should be
discontinued.   In  1975,   the State approved
plans for interim maintenance and final closure
of the dump.  In 1977, the waste was covered
with  soil  as part of the preliminary  closure
activities.    This  Record  of  Decision  (ROD)
addresses the  contaminated  soil and  debris
present  at  the  site  in the landfill  and in the
quarry pond, and provides for protection of the
ground  water, pond water, and sediment from
further   contamination.       The    primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
debris   are  organics   including
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP);  and metals
including aluminum, barium, copper, zinc, and
manganese.

The   selected  remedial  action for this  site
includes removing landfill  surface  and quarry
debris and disposing of  the wastes in one of
the test pits at the  site, an approved  sanitary
landfill, or a hazardous waste landfill; replacing
the  plastic  test-pit caps  with  landfill  cap
material; regrading  the landfill cap  to  stabilize
site conditions  and  to meet State and  Federal
regulations; revegetating the landfill; conducting
long-term  ground   water  monitoring  and
analysis;   and   implementing   institutional
controls including deed restrictions to restrict
site usage, and site access restrictions such as
fencing.  The estimated present worth cost  for
this  remedial action ranges between  $791,512
and  $1,189,741  (depending on which of the
three disposal options is  implemented), which
includes a total O&M cost of $270,042 for years
0 to 5.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
No chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil or
debris were provided.  Source treatment and
removal should indirectly reduce the level of
ground water contamination. Chemical-specific
ground water cleanup goals are based primarily
on the proposed MCL for DEHP 4.0 ug/1. The
surface   water  cleanup  goal   for  copper  is
12.0 ug/1, which will be  less than or  equal to
a hazard quotient of 1.0.
                                             130

-------
INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions will be implemented to limit  site
usage.

KEYWORDS:    Capping;  Clean  Water  Act;
Debris;   Direct  Contact;   Drinking   Water
Contaminants;   Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Inorganics;  Institutional   Controls;  MCLGs;
MCLs;  Metals; O&M;  Onsite  Containment;
Organics; Safe  Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations.
        MUNISPORT LANDFILL, FL
        First Remedial Action - Final
                July 26, 1990

The 291-acre Munisport Landfill site, including
a 170-acre, inactive municipal landfill, is within
the city of North Miami, Dade County, Florida.
The  site  is adjacent to the  State Mangrove
Preserve,  a  wetlands  area  that is  tidally
connected  to  Biscayne  Bay.   To minimize
contaminated  surface  water runoff from  the
landfill,  a  dike  was  installed  through  the
Mangrove swamp at the southeast edge of the
site.   This dike has  hydrologically altered  the
fauna and flora of the inland wetlands area.
The Biscayne aquifer underlies the Munisport
property and  is  the sole  source  of  drinking
water for Dade County; however, the ground
water in  the  portion  of the aquifer located
directly under the site is non-potable due to
high salt  concentrations.   The  city of North
Miami  leased  291  acres  to  Munisport  for
recreational development in 1971 which begin
filling low-lying areas of the site with clean fill
and construction debris.  In 1975, a temporary
permit allowed solid waste to be used as fill
above the water  table   However, in  1976, a
State inspection found  twelve 55-gallon drums
that were  leaking wastes onsite; a violation was
issued, and these drums were removed offsite
by the city. In 1977, Munisport applied for a
404 permit modification to  dump additional
solid wastes in the wetlands.  EPA opposed the
modification and in 1981, issued a CWA 404(c)
veto followed by an Administrative Order (AO)
that  prohibited   any  additional  filling  and
required removal or realignment of the diking
at the Mangrove Preserve to restore the altered
wetland  area.   In  1981,  the State  directed
Munisport and the city to provide final closure
of the landfill.  Landfilling operations ceased in
1981,  but  closure has not  yet  taken place.
Leachate from the landfill  waste still  poses a
significant  threat  to  the aquatic organisms in
the Mangrove Preserve.  The ground water is
no longer used for potable purposes as a result
of salt water  intrusion.  The contaminants of
concern  affecting  the ground  water include
VOCs  including  benzene and  toluene; other
organics including phenols; metals including
arsenic,  chromium,  and   lead;   and  other
inorganics.

The  selected   remedial  action  for  the  site
includes intercepting, collecting, and  treating
the leachate-contaminated ground water prior
to its emergence  into the Mangrove  Preserve,
with onsite discharge of treated ground water;
initiating  landfill closure proceedings by the
State; conducting hydrologic, water quality, and
treatability studies as  part of  the  remedial
design.  Based on  the studies, the less favored
alternative remedy may  include  intercepting
the leachate-contaminated ground water plume
by  constructing   a  hydraulic barrier  using
negative pressure;  treating  the  contaminated
ground  water with air stripping,adjusting the
pH,  and discharging  the treated effluent into
onsite  shallow subsurface   trenches or onsite
surface water to enhance the treatment process;
and  making  hydrologic improvements to the
Mangrove Preserve and  the altered wetlands.
Alternatively, the site may be treated by using
positive infiltration to provide the hydraulic
barrier,  biological  treatment  to  reduce  the
contaminants,  and discharging treated effluent
to an onsite trench to maintain  a hydraulic
barrier.  The estimated total  present worth cost
for  the negative-pressure  remedial action is
$6,166,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $430,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Treated effluent will  meet  appropriate Clean
Water Act and  State standards for discharge to
ground  water or surface water, as appropriate;
however,  no  chemical-specific  goals  were
provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Biodegradation/LandApplication; Carcinogenic
Compounds;   Chromium; Clean Water  Act;
Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring;    Ground   Water    Treatment;
Inorganics;  Landfill  Closure;  Lead;  Metals;
O&M;  Onsite  Discharge;   Onsite  Treatment;
Organics;  Phenols; Plume Management;
                                              131

-------
Sole-Source    Aquifer;   State
Standards/Regulations;  Toluene;  Treatability
Studies; VOCs; Wetlands.
  NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL, NC
          Second Remedial Action
             September 28,  1990

The 465-acre National Starch and Chemical site
is a manufacturing facility for textile finishing
and  custom  speciality  chemicals in  Rowan
County, North Carolina.  A  portion of the site
is heavily wooded, and surrounding land use
is mixed industrial and residential.  From 1971
to  1978,  approximately  350,000  gallons  of
reaction  vessel  wash water  containing  salt
brines,  sulfuric  acid  solutions,  and  solvents
were  disposed  of onsite  in unlined trenches.
Liquid  plant  production  wastes also  were
disposed of in the trenches after being held in
an  unlined pretreatment lagoon.   In  1976,
sampling by the site operator revealed shallow
ground water contamination in the trench area.
A State  investigation in  1977 supported  this
finding,  and  the  State  requested the  site
operator to cease onsite liquid waste disposal
in the trench area. A 1988 Record of Decision
(ROD) addressed Operable Unit 1 (OU1), which
called for onsite ground  water pumping and
treatment,   further   investigation  of   soil
contamination in  the  trench  area, continued
surface water and sediment monitoring and a
supplemental remedial investigation (RI). This
ROD  addresses OU2, and identifies no further
action as the remedy for the trench area soil
based on the supplemental  RI.  A subsequent
ROD  will  address OU3, the remediation of
onsite  contaminated   surface   water   and
sediment, which are unrelated to the trench soil
contamination.  Results of the supplemental RI
indicate  that the  natural leaching  process of
percolating rainfall will continue to reduce the
soil contamination level.   Because the  existing
ground water treatment system is designed to
treat  contaminants leaching into  the  ground
water, there are no additional contaminants of
concern relating to the trench area soil.

The selected remedial action for OU2 is no
further action.   Soil  will be monitored on a
quarterly  basis,  and  institutional  controls
including    deed    restrictions   will   be
implemented.    The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $151,000, which
includes a total O&M cost  of $150,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:        Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:  Institutional Controls; No Action
Remedy; O&M.
    NORTH HOLLYWOOD DUMP, TN
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 13, 1990

The 70-acre North Hollywood Dump site is an
inactive, privately owned landfill in Memphis,
Shelby County,  Tennessee, in the Wolf River
floodplain.   Directly beneath   the  site is a
contaminated aquifer from which ground water
discharges directly to the Wolf River.  Adjacent
to the site are an abandoned dredge pond, a
beaver pond, and Oxbow  Lake, all of which
were  affected by the site.  From the mid-1930s
until  its   closure  in  1967,  municipal  and
industrial refuse  were disposed of  at the site,
which was operated by the  city of Memphis.
A precise description of the materials disposed
of is unknown.   In  addition,  unauthorized
dumping  is thought to have occurred  during
the 1970s. In 1979 and 1980,  EPA and State
studies  revealed  various  contaminants both
onsite and offsite  in  soil, sediment, ground
water, surface water, and fish.  Commercial
fishing activities in the Wolf River ceased, and
EPA  required removal of  contaminated soil,
capping of the landfill, and fencing of the site.
The  RI/FS process identified   buried  drums
onsite.     This  Record  of  Decision  (ROD)
addresses  all of the  contaminated media by
containing the  source  areas,   including  the
landfill  and onsite surface water bodies, with
provisions for  offsite  surface  and  shallow
ground water  monitoring  and  treatment  as
necessary.   The  primary  contaminants  of
concern  affecting the soil,  sediment,  debris,
ground water, and surface water are organics
including pesticides, specifically aldrin, endrin
and  chlordane;  and metals  including  arsenic
and  lead.

The   selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating buried wastes  and soil in
easily eroded areas near the edge of the landfill
and  consolidating  them in  the landfill area;
excavating and characterizing waste within the
buried  drums;   consolidating  debris  in  the
landfill or, should contaminant levels warrant
                                              132

-------
it, properly  disposing  of debris as well  as
drummed wastes offsite; upgrading the existing
landfill cover to be a total of 24 inches thick;
partially dewatering the surface impoundments;
excavating the contaminated sediment from the
beaver pond and placing them within Oxbow
Lake; covering  the  contaminated  lake  and
beaver pond sediment with a 36-inch hydraulic
geofabric cover, and infilling Oxbow Lake with
clean fill; harvesting contaminated fish from the
abandoned   dredge   pond;    hydraulically
containing  the  contaminated  dredge   pond
sediment with geofabric and three feet of clean
fill;  refilling the   pond  with   water  and
restocking with unaffected fish; monitoring the
shallow  ground  water,   with  provisions  for
future  pumping  and  treatment  if necessary;
conducting  surface  water  (both onsite  and
offsite),   air,  and  biota  monitoring;  and
implementing institutional controls to  restrict
onsite land use and to prohibit well installation
in the  vicinity,  and  site access restrictions
including fencing.  The estimated present worth
cost  for   this remedial  action  is  $8,041,890,
which includes a total O&M cost  of $1,610,310.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Specific goals for ground water include  arsenic
0.140 ug/1  (proposed  State  Water Quality
Standard)  and  lead 3.8 ug/1 (CWA  Water
Quality Criteria) at the point the ground water
reaches the Wolf River.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Construction of
wells in the vicinity is not permitted, as  county
regulations  prohibit  the  placement  of wells
within  a   floodplain.     Onsite  land  use
restrictions will also  be implemented.

KEYWORDS:     Air   Monitoring;   Arsenic;
Capping;   Carcinogenic   Compounds;  Clean
Water Act;  Debris; Direct Contact; Dredging;
Excavation; Filling; Floodplain; Ground  Water;
Ground    Water  Monitoring;   Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Onsite Containment;  Onsite Disposal; Organics;
Pesticides;   Sediment;    Soil;    State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Water Quality Criteria.
   PICKETTVILLE ROAD LANDFILL, FL
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The 52-acre Pickettville Road Landfill site is an
inactive  municipal  landfill   in  Jacksonville,
Duval County,  Florida.  The  area is rural with
mixed  industrial   and   residential  usage.
Adjacent to the site is Little Sixmile Creek to
the east, which empties into Sixmile Creek to
the north of the site.  Waste debris from the
landfill   is  present  within   the  100-year
floodplain of Sixmile Creek.  The site overlies
a surficial sand aquifer and a deeper limestone
aquifer.  From  the 1940s to the  1960s, the  site
was  used  primarily as a  sand borrow  pit.
From 1968, when landfilling  operations began,
to 1971, the municipal landfill accepted  all
types of wastes.   Subsequently, the landfill
accepted hazardous wastes exclusively. Types
of wastes disposed of onsite included waste oil,
lead-acid battery liquid waste, battery casings,
terpene  sludge,  and   PCBs.    County   site
inspections in  1975  and 1976, revealed many
improper   waste disposal  and  maintenance
practices, and the landfill was closed in 1977.
These disposal  practices resulted in  leaching of
wastes into Sixmile  Creek,  the  ground water
and soil.  Several investigations  from 1979 to
1990,  characterized the affected media and the
nature  and  extent  of  onsite  and  offsite
contamination.  This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses both  source control and management
of contaminant  migration, and is a final remedy
for the site.   The  primary contaminants  of
concern affecting the soil, debris, and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, TCE, and
toluene; other organics including acids, PCBs;
and metals including arsenic, chromium, and
lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this   site
includes excavating the waste, soil,  and debris
from  the 100-year floodplain of  Sixmile Creek
to a  depth of  five  feet, followed  by onsite
disposal of waste and debris within  the landfill
area; capping the landfill with a  clay and soil
cover; installing a passive landfill gas venting
system; providing an alternate water supply to
residents  affected   by  the  ground  water
contaminant plume by extending a  city water
main,   implementing   a    plugging   and
abandonment program  for the affected wells;
ground  water  monitoring; and  implementing
institutional controls including ground water
use and  deed  restrictions,  and  site access
restrictions,  such as fencing.  The estimated
                                              133

-------
present  worth cost  for this remedial action is
$9,935,000, which includes an estimated annual
O&M cost of $171,100 for 20  years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Surface   water  discharge  limits  are  SARA
Alternate  Concentration  Limits (ACLs),  and
include  benzene 115 ug/1 and vinyl chloride
115 ug/1.    Ground water  discharge,  which
exceeds ACLs may indicate the need for future
ground  water remediation.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use and deed restrictions will be implemented
at the site.

KEYWORDS:   Acids; ACLs;  Alternate  Water
Supply;   Arsenic;   Benzene;    Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds; Chromium;  Clean
Water Act; Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct
Contact;  Drinking  Water   Contaminants;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLGs;  MCLs;   Metals;   O&M;  Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Organics; PCBs;
Plume  Management;  RCRA;  Safe  Drinking
Water  Act;  Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; Venting; VOCs; Water Quality
Criteria.
         SCHUYLKILL METAL, FL
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The 17-acre Schuylkill Metal site  is a former
battery recycling facility containing marsh areas
in  the  southwest  portion of  Plant  City,
Hillsborough County, Florida.   From  1972  to
1986, the facility was used to recycle lead from
batteries; the lead was subsequently sent offsite
for smelter processing.  Wastes generated in the
recycling process included rubber and plastic
chips from battery casings and sulfuric  acid
solution.   In  1980,  the  State required the
removal of approximately 250 tons of sediment
from a disposal  pond, 3,000 tons of battery
casings, and 500 tons of soil  underlying the
battery   casings.    Prior   to   1981,  acidic
washdown  wastewaters  were  stored  in  a
2.2-acre, unlined wastewater holding pond, and
neutralized with lime or ammonia. In 1981, the
facility  upgraded  the  wastewater  treatment
system, and acidic rinse washdown wastewaters
were neutralized with sodium  hydroxide and
discharged into the city's treatment plant. Site
investigations conducted in 1981 revealed that
onsite   surficial  aquifer  monitoring   wells
contained   elevated   levels   of  ammonia.
Analyses of soil,  surface water, and sediment
samples near the processing area and around
the   holding    pond    revealed    elevated
concentrations  of metals.    This  Record  of
Decision (ROD) provides a final remedy and
addresses all contaminants at  the  site.   The
contaminants  of  concern  affecting the  soil,
debris,  sediment, ground  water, and surface
water  are  acids  and  metals including  lead,
arsenic, and chromium.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this site
includes excavation and onsite solidification of
approximately    36,000    cubic    yards   of
contaminated soil from the process area and
approximately    2,000   cubic   yards   of
contaminated sediment from the ditches;  onsite
disposal of  treated soil  and sediment; debris
recycling; onsite  treatment of  surface  water
from   the   wastewater  holding  pond  and
pumping and treatment of ground water by
chemical action  and  filtration,  followed by
offsite  discharge  of the treated surface and
ground water to a publicly  owned treatment
works  (POTW) or to surface water; biological
monitoring of the east and west onsite marshes;
installing flood  control mechanisms to maintain
continued surface water inundation in the east
marsh; mitigating the wetlands that have been
adversely   impacted   by   the   site;   and
implementing  of   site   access   restrictions
including fencing. The estimated present  worth
cost for  this  remedial action  ranges  from
$5,864,000 to $8,161,000, depending on  O&M
costs,  which  will  be  estimated  during  the
RD/RA phase.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
All soil with lead levels  of 500 mg/kg and
ditch sediment to a  depth of 2 feet will  be
treated  by chemical stabilization.  This cleanup
level  was   based onsite-specific analyses  to
prevent excessive lead leaching to  the ground
water.  Debris  will be excavated to a depth of
between 3 and 10 feet below land surface and
will be recycled.   Ground  water cleanup level
is  lead 0.015 mg/1  (MCLs  or  background
levels),  and  treated water discharged to nearby
wetlands will achieve lead  levels of 0.013 mg/1
(WQC).  The Ambient Water Quality Criteria
for the existing marsh and for surface  water
has  been waived, due to the  potential for
destructive  effects of  the  remediation on the
wetlands.
                                              134

-------
INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls will be implemented in marsh areas.

KEYWORDS:  Acids; ARAR Waiver; Arsenic;
Background Levels; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium;  Clean Water Act; Debris;  Direct
Contact;  Excavation; Ground  Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;  Onsite  Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works  (POTW);  Safe  Drinking Water  Act;
Sediment;   Soil;    Solidification/Stabilization;
Surface   Water;  Surface  Water  Treatment;
Treatability  Studies;  Treatment  Technology;
Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
         SCRDI BLUFF ROAD, SC
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 12, 1990

The 4-acre SCRDI Bluff Road site is an inactive
chemical   waste   manufacturing,   storage,
recycling,  and  disposal  facility  in  Richland
County, South Carolina. Surrounding land use
is rural residential and industrial, and  part of
the site has been classified as a wetlands area.
The site was first used as an industrial  facility,
which   manufactured  acetylene  gas.    Two
lagoons were constructed onsite to support this
operation.  Starting in 1975, the site  was used
as a storage, recycling, and disposal facility for
chemical waste.  An above-ground storage tank
was installed for use in  these  processes.  All
operations at the site ceased in 1982 after State
investigations identified onsite soil and  ground
water contamination.  From 1982 to  1983, the
State  addressed  the  site contamination  and
required the removal of over 7,500  drums
containing   various    chemicals,    visibly
contaminated soil, and above-ground structures.
Additionally,  in  1989,   the   storage  tank
containing   approximately   100  gallons  of
contaminated  sludge  was  removed.    This
Record   of   Decision   (ROD)    addresses
remediation of both the contaminant source and
ground water, and provides a final remedy for
the site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil  and  ground water are VOCs
including  benzene, toluene,  PCE, TCE,  and
xylenes,  other   organics   including   PCBs,
phenols, and  pesticides; and metals.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes pumping  and  onsite  treatment of
ground water using flocculation/precipitation as
a pretreatment  to remove metals, air stripping
to remove VOCs, and granular activated carbon
adsorption  to  remove  semi-volatile  organic
compounds,   if  necessary,   followed   by
reinjecting  the  treated  water onsite;  treating
contaminated   soil  in-situ   using  vacuum
extraction,  followed  by carbon adsorption or
fume   incineration   to  destroy   off-gases;
managing carbon residuals from ground water
and  soil treatments through offsite disposal or
regeneration; and monitoring soil and  ground
water.  The estimated present worth cost for
this   remedial   action  is  $5,574,984,   which
includes an annual O&M cost of $311,287 for
16 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup standards  for  ground water  are the
more stringent of Federal or State MCLs or
proposed  MCLs.    Chemical-specific  ground
water  goals  include benzene 5 ug/1  (MCL),
PCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), toluene
2 mg/1 (MCL),  and xylenes 10 mg/1  (MCL).
Soil cleanup levels were calculated using a soil
leachability.
        YELLOW WATER ROAD, FL
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 14-acre Yellow Water Road site is a former
storage  area for  PCB-contaminated liquids and
electrical equipment in Baldwin, Duval County,
Florida.  Dense  woodlands are located along
the perimeter of  the site, and surrounding land
use is commercial  and residential.   In  1981,
onsite storage of PCB-contaminated liquids and
electrical  equipment  began  at  the  former
operational  area in anticipation of upcoming
onsite incineration operations, but the proper
permits for the incinerator were never obtained.
Subsequently in 1982, PCB-contaminated  oils
were  spilled at  the site as a  result of onsite
salvage   operation   which  included  metal
removal from transformers.  As a result of this
onsite PCB  contamination,  EPA  conducted a
removal action in 1984 that included cleaning
and storing 719 electrical transformers, securing
100,000  gallons of PCB liquids in onsite holding
tanks, and excavating and storing 3,000 cubic
yards of PCB-contaminated soil onsite. In 1988,
EPA directed a  second  removal action  which
included demolishing an  onsite  warehouse;
disposing of warehouse debris and stockpiling
contaminated soil  offsite;  incinerating  78,854
gallons  of PCB liquids offsite; and disposing of
                                             135

-------
704  transformers   and   18,690  pounds  of
capacitors offsite.   This  Record of Decision
(ROD)   addresses   the   remediation   of
PCB-contaminated  soil and sediment.  Onsite
ground water contamination will be addressed
in  a  subsequent  ROD.     The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
sediment are organics including PCBs.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes excavating 3,560 cubic yards of onsite
contaminated  soil  and sediment with  PCB
concentrations   greater    than   10 mg/kg;
solidifying   and   stabilizing  the  soil   and
sediment, if a treatability study determines the
effectiveness of using solidification for organics;
placing  treated  soil  within  the old salvage
operational  area and covering the area with
1-foot-thick  soil cover; conducting teachability
studies  of   the   treated  mass;  backfilling
excavated areas with clean  soil and revegetating
the site; implementing site  access restrictions
including  fencing;  conducting ground  water
monitoring;  and   abandoning  ground  water
wells within the excavated area, if necessary.
The  estimated present worth  cost  for  this
remedial  action  ranges   from  $1,119,000  to
$1,448,200,  (depending  on  the  soil  disposal
method used), which includes a total O&M cost
of $62,600 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Onsite soil  cleanup levels are based  on the
TSCA PCB Spill Cleanup Policy for unrestricted
sites.  PCBs will be remediated to a level of
10 mg/kg with a minimum excavation depth of
10 inches, and excavated areas will be covered
with clean  fill to reduce levels of PCBs to less
than 1 mg/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water Monitoring;
Leachability Tests; O&M;  Onsite Containment;
Onsite Disposal;  Onsite  Treatment;  Organics;
PCBs;   Sediment;    Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization;  Toxic  Substances
Control Act;  Treatability Studies;  Treatment
Technology.
      ZELLWOOD GROUNDWATER
            CONTAMINATION, FL
     First Remedial Action (Amendment)
               March 1, 1990

The    57-acre   Zellwood    Groundwater
Contamination site  is approximately 1/2-mile
west  of  the  town of  Zellwood  in  Orange
County, Florida.  The  site is situated in a rural
area,  and  approximately  300  homes  located
within one mile  of the site depend on private
wells for their potable water supply.  The site
is comprised of  four  active industries  and an
open field with marshy wetlands.  Prior to
1963,  the   area   was   used   by   several
agriculturally  related  businesses.  In  1963, a
drum recycling facility began operations at the
site.  During the  drum recycling process, onsite
wastewaters were generated by draining and
cleaning    procedures,   and    two    onsite
evaporation/percolation ponds (#1 and #2) were
used  in  the  treatment and  disposal  of the
wastewaters.   A new treatment system  was
installed  in 1980 and use of  the  ponds  was
discontinued.  In 1981, the site owners drained
the  two  ponds and moved   some  of the
contaminated  sediment  to an  offsite  landfill.
The  remainder of  the contaminated sediment
was   consolidated  into a  temporary  sludge
storage area  before the sediment  was moved
offsite in 1982 and the onsite ponds were filled
in.    In  1982, EPA identified  an abandoned
drum storage area by a  6-acre field at the
northern part of  the site, which was apparently
used  for the disposal  of drums and  other
wastes.   Site investigations by EPA from 1988
to 1990  identified contamination  in the  soil,
sediment, and ground water at  the site.   This
Record    of   Decision    (ROD)   addresses
remediation of onsite source areas.    Ground
water remediation  will  be  addressed  in a
subsequent ROD. The primary contaminants of
concern  affecting the soil and sediment  are
VOCs including PCE,  toluene and  xylenes;
other organics including PAHs  and pesticides;
and  metals including  lead and chromium.

The   selected  remedial  action  for  this site
includes  excavating approximately 3,000 cubic
yards of contaminated soil and sediment from
the ditch, drum, and  pond areas,  followed by
onsite stabilization and solidification of the soil
and  sediment; replacing the stabilized soil and
sediment into the excavation area, covering the
area  with top  soil  and  reseeding  the area;
evaluating existing ground  water wells  for
decommissioning;    and   ground    water
                                             136

-------
monitoring.  This ROD amends a 1987 ROD,
which proposed treatment of contaminated soil
and sediment by incineration with disposal of
the residual  ash onsite.  The estimated total
cost  for  this remedial action  is  $1,030,000,
which includes an estimated total O&M cost of
$250,000 over 10 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil cleanup criteria were calculated using site
specific soil and climatic data from the  EPA,
State, and other sources.  Chemical-specific
goals  for  soil  include  lead   220 mg/kg,
chromium  100 mg/kg, total PAHs 10 mg/kg,
PCE 1  mg/kg,  toluene 30 mg/kg, and  total
xylenes 5 mg/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.

KEYWORDS:     Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Chromium; Clean  Water Act; Direct  Contact;
Drinking   Water  Contaminants;  Excavation;
Ground Water Monitoring; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Onsite  Containment;  Onsite  Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Pesticides; RCRA;
ROD  Amendment;    Sediment;    Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization;   State
Standards/Regulations; PCE;  Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
                                           137

-------
                           RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 5
                    (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin)
  ALGOMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, WI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 29, 1990

The 13-acre  Algoma Municipal Landfill site is
an  inactive  municipal  landfill   in  Algoma,
Kewaunee  County, Wisconsin.   Surrounding
land   use   is   primarily   agricultural/rural
residential with wetlands adjacent to the site.
The  site overlies  an  aquifer that  currently
supplies water to private wells.  From  1969 to
1983,  the  site was operated  as  a municipal
landfill comprised of  3 distinct landfill areas.
Solvents,  thinners,   lacquers,   as  well   as
municipal wastes were reportedly disposed of
in the main  landfill area known as the Landfill
Disposal Area (LDA).  Two smaller areas, the
North  Disposal  Area  (NDA)  and the South
Disposal Area (SDA) were reportedly used for
the  disposal  of  construction   debris  and
asbestos-contaminated sludge.  Approximately
400,000 cubic yards of municipal  wastes were
disposed of at the site.  In 1983, the  landfill
was  closed and  the  wastes were  covered.
However,  over time, the cap has deteriorated
due  to weather  and  lack of  protection from
freezing and thawing.  Therefore, the  current
cover has not been impermeable and  landfill
contaminants  have  been  released  into  the
ground  water.     EPA  site  investigations
conducted  in  1984 and  1989  revealed onsite
ground water contamination caused by  sources
leaching  from  the LDA.    This Record  of
Decision  (ROD)  addresses the remediation of
contaminated source and ground water. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water,  soil,  and  debris are  VOCs
including benzene; other organics; and metals
including arsenic and cadmium.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  capping  the  LDA with  a  soil/clay
cover and  installing a gas venting system to
remove off-gases; covering the SDA and NDA
with   a   soil   cover,   if   further   waste
characterization  determines  these areas to  be
sources of  asbestos contamination; monitoring
ground water onsite,  offsite,  and  in  nearby
private wells to  determine  the effectiveness of
the landfill cap in controlling the migration of
contaminants into ground  water; monitoring
landfill gases; and implementing  institutional
controls including deed  restrictions, and site
access   restrictions   such  as  fencing.   The
estimated present worth cost  for this remedial
action  is $1,298,000,  which  includes  a  total
O&M cost of $11,000 for  30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
The  State  has determined  that  contaminant
migration  from the  landfill to ground water
must not exceed State Prevention Action Limits
(PALs), including benzene 0.067 ug/1 (PAL).

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:        Deed
restrictions  will be implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:    Arsenic;  Benzene;  Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds;   Debris;  Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls;   MCLs;   Metals;   O&M;   Onsite
Containment;  Organics;  Plume Management;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; Solvents;  State
Standards/Regulations;    Venting;   VOCs;
Wetlands.
     ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT, MI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28,  1990

The 12.5-acre Anderson Development site is an
active   chemical   manufacturing  facility  in
Adrian, Madison  Township, Lenawee County,
Michigan.  The site is in a 40-acre  industrial
park, and  is  comprised  of several areas of
contamination that  exceed health-based levels,
including a 0.5-acre former process wastewater
pretreatment lagoon containing lagoon sludge,
clay  underlying  the  lagoon,   and  a  small
quantity of soil near the lagoon. From 1970 to
1979,   the   plant   produced   4,4-methylene
bis(2-chloroaniline)   (MBOCA),  a  hardening
agent  for  the  production   of polyurethane
plastics. Process wastewater was discharged
directly to  surface  water until  1973, when it
was  discharged to a publicly owned  treatment
works  (POTW).  In 1979, the State ordered the
POTW  not to  accept the  waste  stream  because
of  the decreased  efficiency of  the   POTW
resulting from MBOCA.  In  1980 and 1981, the
site owner  and the State performed  a  cleanup
action  of all contaminated site areas with levels
                                             138

-------
of  MBOCA  above  1  ppm.  This  included
decontaminating the plant, sweeping  streets,
shampooing/vacuuming residential carpet, and
removing some  surface soil.  This Record of
Decision (ROD)  addresses  the  remediation of
the pretreatment lagoon area.   The primary
contaminants  of concern  affecting  soil  and
lagoon  sludge are organics, namely MBOCA
and its degradation products.

The selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes removing and treating standing water
in the lagoon; excavating  contaminated  soil,
clay, and lagoon sludge from a  100-foot by
75-foot  area  and placing the  material  in an
unexcavated portion of the  lagoon; treating the
contaminated  material  by  in-situ vitrification;
collecting pyrolized  gases, and  treating the
gases using a scrubber system, air filters, and
carbon  adsorption  beds;  filling  the  lagoon
containing the vitrified material with clean fill;
and conducting ground water monitoring and
soil sampling.   The estimated present  worth
cost for  this remedial  action  is $2,364,050,
which  includes  a  total  O&M cost of $38,530
over 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS: A
cleanup  action level of MBOCA 1,684 ug/kg
was calculated  based  upon  EPA  guidance
documentation.  The cleanup level corresponds
with the excess lifetime cancer risk level of 10"6.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:      Air   Monitoring;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water  Act; Direct Contact;
Dredging;   Excavation;   Ground   Water
Monitoring;  O&M; Onsite  Disposal;  Onsite
Treatment; Organics; RCRA; Sludge; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Treatment;  Treatability  Studies;  Treatment
Technology; Vitrification.
           BOFORS NOBEL, MI
           First Remedial Action
             September 17, 1990

The  85-acre  Bofors  Nobel  site  is an  active
specialty chemical production plant in Edelston
Township,  Muskegon County, Michigan.  An
inactive landfill  is also  located in the  eastern
portion of the site.  Onsite wetlands lie within
icthe floodplain of Big Black Creek, which runs
through the southern portion of the site.  The
site overlies  a  lacustrine aquifer, a potential
drinking  water  source,  which  has  been
contaminated  as a  result  of site  activities.
During  the  1960s  and  early 1970s,  sludge,
wastewater,  and waste  liquids  from  plant
operations  were discharged  into 10  onsite
lagoons.   Subsequent  investigations by EPA
have identified eight of  the onsite lagoons  as
potential    sources   of    ground    water
contamination.   In  1976, the State restricted
wastewater  discharge  from  the  site,  and  a
ground water pump and  treatment system was
installed to treat contaminated ground water  in
the lacustrine aquifer.  This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation of the lagoons,  as
well as upgrading  the  current ground water
treatment system. A subsequent final ROD will
address other contaminated  soil  and complete
restoration   of   the  aquifer.    The  primary
contaminants  of concern affecting the  soil,
sludge, and ground water are VOCs including
benzene.

The selected  remedial  action  for  this site
includes excavating approximately 101,000 cubic
yards of  sludge and  berm  material highly
contaminated   with   VOCs,   treating   the
contaminated material onsite using incineration
and  low  temperature  thermal  desorption,
disposing  of the residual  ash  in an  onsite
landfill, and  treating scrubber water from the
incinerator  by  precipitation;  treating  landfill
leachate in  the ground water treatment  system;
excavating approximately 372,000 cubic yards of
less VOC-contaminated  soil  and  sludge and
disposing of these wastes onsite in the landfill;
pumping and treatment of ground water using
ozone oxidation or a comparable treatment with
onsite discharge to  surface  water; monitoring
ground  water,  surface  water, and air;  and
implementing site access restrictions including
fencing.  The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial  action  is $70,874,000, which
includes an annual  O&M cost of $313,000 for
43 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Landfilled  material  must  exhibit  an excess
lifetime  cancer  risk   of   less   than   10*
Chemical-specific soil   cleanup   levels  were
developed  based on the type and location  of
contaminated media within  or adjacent to the
lagoons including benzene 410 to 4,500 ug/kg.
Ground water  cleanup  levels are based  on
proposed Best Available  Technology discharge
standards including benzene 5.0  ug/1.
                                             139

-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not provided.

KEYWORDS:     Air   Monitoring;   Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water  Act;  Direct  Contact;  Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground
Water;  Ground  Water Monitoring;  Ground
Water   Treatment;   Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;  Leachability Tests; MCLs; MCLGs;
O&M;  Onsite  Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water  Act; Sludge;  Soil;  Solvents;
State  Standards/Regulations;  Surface  Water
Monitoring;  Treatability   Studies;  Treatment
Technology;  VOCs; Wetlands.
       CLARE WATER SUPPLY, MI
           First Remedial Action
              August 30, 1990

The Clare Water Supply site is the public water
supply system for the city of Clare,  Clare
County,  Michigan.  The Clare Water Supply
system withdraws  ground  water  from four
municipal wells (MW) in the site wellfield, each
tapping an unconsolidated sand aquifer.   In
1981,   ground  water   sampling   revealed
contaminants    including    chlorinated
hydrocarbons in two of the wells (MW #2 and
MW #5)  in the northeastern portion of the site.
An industrial area containing approximately 14
manufacturing and retailing businesses operates
west of the contaminated wells.  Soil samples
extracted from this industrial area indicate soil
contaminated with TCE and DCE. In addition,
a nearby settling lagoon contains solvents and
heavily  contaminated   sediment.       EPA
conducted a short-term study that determined
that   the major   source  of  ground   water
contamination  resulted  from  contaminants
leaching out of soil on the industrial properties,
entering  a   shallow  perched   aquifer,  and
migrating to the deeper aquifer that  serves the
municipal wellfield.  The Clare Water Supply
wellfield is the sole source of drinking water
for the community.  Remedial actions for this
site will  focus on  two Operable Units (OUs).
This Record  of Decision  (ROD) provides an
interim  remedy,   which  addresses   TCE
contamination of the drinking water supply. A
subsequent  ROD   will  address  OU2,  the
remaining ground  water contaminants as well
as   soil   contamination.      The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including TCE.
The  selected  remedial  action for this interim
remedy includes installing and operating an air
stripper to treat the ground water,  modifying
pipelines on the existing water supply system,
monitoring treated water from the air stripper
prior to   its  release into  the  water  supply
system, and monitoring air emissions from the
air stripper. The estimated present worth cost
for  this interim remedial action is  $1,284,059,
which includes  an annual O&M cost of $61,000
for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
This ROD will remediate ground water TCE
and TCE-degradation components to meet Safe
Drinking  Water  Act  MCLs  including  TCE
5.0 ug/1.   Additional chemical-specific ground
water  goals   will  be  determined  in  the
subsequent ROD.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not  applicable.

KEYWORDS:    Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Carcinogenic   Compounds;  Direct   Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground  Water Monitoring; Ground   Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy; MCLs; Municipally
Owned Site;  O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW);  Safe Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source
Aquifer;   State   Standards/Regulations;  TCE;
Treatment Technology;  VOCs.
         FISHER CALO CHEM, IN
        First Remedial Action - Final
               August 7, 1990

The  Fisher  Calo  Chem  site  is  in  LaPorte
County, Indiana.  The site is comprised of the
33-acre  One-Line Road facility,  the  340-acre
Two-Line Road facility, and  the 170-acre Space
Leasing facility.   Surrounding the  site are
woodlands, grasslands, wetlands, and a wildlife
area.  Site contamination at all three facilities is
the result of the production and distribution of
industrial chemicals,  and reclamation of waste
paint and  metal finishing solvents.  From 1970
to 1985, packaging and storage  violations were
documented by the State during investigations.
In 1979 when the State excavated buried drums
from the  One-Line  Road  facility, additional
onsite contamination was  identified.  In 1982,
EPA  initiated  site investigations that  revealed
elevated  levels of  organic  compounds  in
ground  water,  heavy metals in the soil, and
evidence of additional buried drums. Sampling
                                             140

-------
and  analysis continued until 1988, when EPA
initiated a removal action to dispose of drums,
tanks,  and  containers at the Two-Line Road
facility.   This  Record  of  Decision  (ROD)
addresses the remaining contaminated  areas
including  the  soil,   waste   material,  and
structures at the site, and contaminated ground
water  in aquifers underlying the site.    The
primary contaminants  of concern affecting  the
soil, debris, and  ground  water are  VOCs
including TCE, toluene, xylenes; other organics
including PAHs  and PCBs; and asbestos.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this   site
includes  excavation   and  incineration   of
semi-volatile and PCB-contaminated  soil, with
ash  disposal location  to be determined  upon
leaching    test   results;    treatment    of
VOC-contaminated   soil  remaining  in   the
excavated area  using  soil flushing  or vapor
extraction; limited asbestos  removal/repair of
structures   and  offsite   disposal   of   any
asbestos-containing materials, drums, tanks, or
containers and their contents; treating ground
water   using  an  equalization/sedimentation
basin,   granular  activated  carbon,   and  air
stripping, followed by  filtration and reinjection
of the treated water into the shallow  aquifer to
enhance soil ground  water monitoring;  and
implementation of site  access restrictions.  The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $31,685,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $9,379.000.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Excavation  levels  for   contaminated  soil  are
based  on TSCA standards and  TBC criteria
including PCBs 10  mg/kg.    Ground  water
cleanup levels are derived from  action levels
adopted by  the  State from SDWA MCLs and
MCLGs, including TCE 5  ug/1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Asbestos; Carbon
Adsorption  (GAC);  Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Debris;   Direct   Contact;  Drinking   Water
Contaminants;   Excavation;  Ground  Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground  Water
Treatment;  Incineration/Thermal  Destruction;
Inorganics; Leachability Tests; MCLGs; MCLs;
O&M;   Offsite   Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;
Onsite  Disposal; Onsite Treatment;  Organics;
PAHs;  PCBs; RCRA; Safe  Drinking Water Act;
Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing; State
Standards/Regulations;  TCE; Toluene;  Toxic
Substances Control Act; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Xylenes.
            HAGEN FARM, WI
            First Remedial Action
             September 17, 1990

The 10-acre Hagen Farm site is a former waste
disposal facility in Dade County, Wisconsin.
This site is in a rural area that is dominated by
sand  and  gravel  mining  and  agricultural
activities.  From 1950 to 1966, waste materials
were disposed of in three subareas of the site's
defined   area   of  contamination.     Onsite
investigations indicate that subarea A, a 6-acre
area  in  the  southern   portion  of  the site,
contains industrial wastes consisting of solvents
and various other organics as well as municipal
waste, whereas subareas B and C, each 1.5-acre
areas in the northeastern portion of the site,
appear  to contain  only  scattered  municipal
wastes.  Site investigations have determined the
need  for  two concurrent operable units.  The
source control operable unit, which  is defined
in this Record of Decision (ROD), addresses the
waste refuse and subsurface soil at areas A, B,
and  C  with  the  goal  of  controlling  the
migration of the waste refuse and  sub-soil and
reducing the volume of contaminants from the
waste and sub-soil  to the ground water. The
ground  water operable  unit will be  addressed
in  a   subsequent   ROD.     The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
waste  refuse  are VOCs including benzene,
toluene,   xylenes;  other  organics  including
phenols and PCBs; and  metals including lead.

The selected  remedial  action for  this  site
includes consolidating  waste  materials from
disposal areas B and C into  disposal area A
and backfilling  excavated  depression  areas
within disposal areas  B  and C with  clean soil,
followed by revegetation; capping disposal area
A  after  consolidation;  treating 67,650  cubic
yards of  waste and  112,000 cubic  yards  of
contaminated sub-soil  materials in disposal area
A using  in-situ vapor  extraction  (ISVE) and
treating   off-gas  emissions   using   carbon
adsorption, followed by regenerating the spent
carbon from the off-gas  treatment process; and
implementing   site  access   restrictions  and
institutional controls including deed restrictions
to prevent installation of drinking water wells
and to protect the integrity of  the cap.   The
                                             141

-------
estimated present worth cost for the remedial
action is $3,299,000 which includes an annual
O&M cost of $29,530 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
The goal of the ISVE will be a 90% removal of
the VOCs from the waste and  contaminated
sub-soil.  Off-gas extracts from the ISVE will be
treated to meet State emission standards.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions  will be  implemented  to prevent
disturbances   of   the   consolidated   capped
material.

KEYWORDS:    Benzene;  Capping;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation; Institutional
Controls;   Lead;   Metals;    O&M;   Onsite
Containment;   Onsite   Disposal;   Onsite
Treatment;   Organics;  PCBs; Phenols;  Soil;
Solvents; State Standards/Regulations; Toluene;
Treatability   Studies;  Treatment  Technology;
Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Xylenes.
          HUNTS DISPOSAL, WI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 29,  1990

The 84-acre Hunts Disposal  site is an inactive
landfill in Caledonia Township, Racine County,
Wisconsin.  Onsite  features include  a 35-acre
landfill  surrounded by woodlands,  wetlands,
agricultural areas, and a lake.  Part of the site
that includes the landfill is within the 100-year
floodplain of the Root River. The site overlies
a  contaminated  surficial  sand  and  gravel
aquifer.  Prior to  1959, when onsite landfilling
operations began, the site  was  a sand  and
gravel pit.  By 1961,  municipal and  industrial
wastes were dumped  and burned in an onsite
open pit.  Approximately 620,000 cubic yards of
waste is currently landfilled onsite, with 168,000
cubic yards present  below  the  water table.
Specific  wastes  disposed of  onsite  included
waste newspaper ink, spent solvents,  tannery
wastes,  chromic  acids,  arsenic  acid,  and
beryllium.    Because State  site  inspections
revealed  improper landfilling practices,   the
State ordered the landfill to close in 1974. EPA
investigations conducted  in  1984  and 1988
characterized   contaminated    media   and
determined the extent of onsite contamination.
The primary contaminant migration pathway is
onsite ground water, which is  contaminated by
wastes leaching from the eroded  landfill cap
and from wastes below the water table.  This
Record  of  Decision  (ROD)  addresses  both
source control and management of contaminant
migration.    The  primary contaminants  of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris, and
ground  water are VOCs  including benzene,
TCE, and xylenes; acids; and metals including
arsenic and chromium.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating  and consolidating 5,300
cubic yards of onsite contaminated soil and
sediment  from outside  the landfill area  to
within the landfill, and filling excavated areas
with clean soil; constructing a levee to prevent
erosion  of the landfill during floods; capping
the landfill  with  a multi-layer  clay and  soil
cover; installing an active landfill gas collection
and  combustion  system; constructing a slurry
wall intersecting  the  cap and  a  subsurface
confining  layer   to   hydraulically   contain
contaminated  ground  water;  pumping and
offsite treatment of ground water, followed by
offsite discharge; and implementing institutional
controls including land and ground  water use
and   deed   restrictions,  and   site   access
restrictions such as  fencing.   The  estimated
present  worth cost for this remedial action is
$17,454,000,  which includes an  annual O&M
cost  of $375,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels chosen for the site
are  State Preventive  Action Limits  (PALs),
which are equal  to,  or more stringent than
Federal  MCLs. Ground water chemical-specific
goals include benzene 1 ug/1, TCE  0.18 ug/1,
xylenes 124 ug/1, arsenic 5 ug/I, and chromium
5 ug/1.  Specific cleanup standards for soil and
sediment  have not been set.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:     Land  and
ground  water use, and deed restrictions will be
implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS:
Acids;   Arsenic;   Benzene;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Water Act; Closure Requirements; Debris;
Deferred Decision; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain;  Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Ground    Water    Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Levees; MCLGs;  MCLs;
Metals;  O&M;  Offsite   Discharge;   Offsite
Treatment;   Onsite   Containment;    Plume
Management; RCRA;  Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Slurry Wall; Soil; State
                                              142

-------
Standards/Regulations;    Surface   Water
Monitoring; TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
       JANESVILLE ASH BEDS, WI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             December 29, 1989

The   Janesville  Ash  Beds   site  is   being
remediated concurrently with the Janesville Old
Landfill site and two  nearby,  non-NPL  sites,
the Janesville  Old  Dump  and the Janesville
New Landfill sites.  These  four sites comprise
the 65-acre Janesville Disposal Facility (JDF) in
Janesville, Wisconsin.  The Janesville Ash Beds
(JAB) site, which is RCRA regulated, operated
from  1974  to  1985  and consisted  of five ash
beds  in which industrial liquids  and  sludge
were  deposited  and allowed to evaporate or
dry.   Although  the JAB site  was excavated,
closed and capped with clay, it is a source of
ground  water  contamination  and  possibly
surface water contamination in the nearby Rock
River.   The  second NPL  site,   the  18-acre
Janesville Old  Landfill site  was operated  from
1963  to 1978, accepting both  municipal  and
industrial  wastes.  The site was capped with
silty sand and  sandy clay at the time of closure
in 1978, but was  subsequently shown to be
contributing   to   air   and   ground   water
contamination.  Two other contingent sites are
also included as  part of this remedy because of
their proximity to the two NPL sites.   A 1986
Consent Order authorized  that the four sites
comprising the JDF would be addressed in one
remedial investigation under the joint authority
of CERCLA and  RCRA. The 16-acre Janesville
New  Landfill  site was operated from  1978 to
1985  and  accepted municipal  and industrial
wastes.  The site is also a possible source of air
and ground water contamination.  The  second
additional  site is  the 15-acre  Janesville  Old
Dump site which was operated from  1950 to
1963  as  a  general  refuse  dump, accepting
unknown  types  of waste.  This site  does not
significantly contaminate the JDF area.   The
primary contaminants of concern  affecting the
ground  water and  air are VOCs including
benzene, PCE, and TCE; and metals including
arsenic.

Remedial  activities  at the JDF site  will  be
implemented at  three of the sites and  include
upgrading the landfill cap, and providing site
drainage as needed, at the JAB site; treating the
landfill gas by  extraction and flaring, upgrading
the landfill cap, and air monitoring at the Old
Landfill site; and treating the landfill gas by
extraction and flaring, upgrading the landfill
cap, improving the leachate collection system,
and  air monitoring at the New  Landfill  site.
No further action will be implemented at the
Janesville    Old    Dump   site.      Overall,
contaminated ground water at the JDF site will
be pumped and treated onsite by  air stripping,
with discharge to  Rock  River,  in conjunction
with ground water monitoring.  Ground water
and  land use and deed restrictions will be
implemented  at  each site.   The  estimated
present worth cost for the Janesville Ash Beds
site  is $1,020,000,  which includes  an annual
O&M cost ranging from $33,100 to $53,100.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Ground water will be treated to attain Federal
MCLs or State standards.  Surface water  will
meet State  surface  water quality  standards.
Chemical-specific   cleanup  goals  were  not
provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and  land
use restrictions will be implemented to assure
that  future use of the site does not increase the
potential  release  of  hazardous  substances.
Deed and ground water use restrictions for the
area between the JDF site and the neighboring
Rock River will also be implemented.

KEYWORDS:    Air;  Air   Monitoring;  Air
Stripping;   Arsenic;    Benzene;   Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds;   Direct   Contact;
Floodplain;  Ground  Water; Ground  Water
Monitoring;    Ground    Water    Treatment;
Institutional  Controls; Landfill Closure; Leachate
Collection/Treatment;  MCLs; Metals;  O&M;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;  Onsite
Treatment; PCE; RCRA;  Safe Drinking Water
Act;   Solvents; State  Standards/Regulations;
TCE; VOCs.
     JANESVILLE OLD LANDFILL, WI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             December 29, 1989

The  Janesville  Old  Landfill  site  is  being
remediated concurrently with the Janesville Ash
Beds site and two nearby, non-NPL sites, the
Janesville Old Dump and the Janesville New
Landfill sites.  These four sites comprise the
65-acre  Janesville  Disposal  Facility  (JDF)  in
Janesville, Wisconsin.   The 18-acre Janesville
Old  Landfill  site was operated  from 1963  to
                                             143

-------
1978, accepting both municipal and industrial
wastes.  The site was capped with silty sand
and sandy clay at the time of closure in 1978,
but was subsequently shown to be contributing
to air and ground water contamination. The
second NPL site, Janesville Ash Beds (JAB) site,
was operated from 1974 to 1985 and consisted
of five ash beds in which industrial liquids and
sludge   were  deposited   and   allowed  to
evaporate or dry.  Although the JAB  site was
excavated, closed and capped with clay, it is a
source  of ground  water  contamination and
possibly  surface  water  contamination in the
nearby Rock River.  Two other contingent sites
are also  included  as   part  of  this  remedy
because of  their proximity to the two NPL
sites.  A  1986 Consent  Order authorized that
the four sites comprising the JDF would  be
addressed in one remedial investigation under
the joint authority of CERCLA and RCRA. The
16-acre  Janesville  New  Landfill  site was
operated  from  1978  to  1985 and accepted
municipal and industrial  wastes.  The  site  is
also a possible source of air and ground water
contamination.   The second  additional  site  is
the 15-acre Janesville Old Dump site which was
operated from 1950  to 1963 as a general refuse
dump,  accepting unknown  types of  waste.
This site does not significantly contaminate the
JDF  area.   The  primary  contaminants  of
concern affecting the ground  water and air are
VOCs including benzene,  PCE, and TCE; and
metals  including arsenic.

Remedial  activities  at   the  JDF  site  will  be
implemented at  three of the  sites and include
treating  the landfill gas  by extraction and
flaring,  upgrading  the  landfill  cap,  and  air
monitoring at the Old Landfill site; upgrading
the landfill cap, and providing site drainage as
needed, at the JAB site; and treating the landfill
gas by  extraction and   flaring, upgrading the
landfill cap, improving  the  leachate collection
system, and air monitoring at the New Landfill
site.  No further action will be implemented at
the  Janesville  Old Dump  site.    Overall,
contaminated ground water at the JDF site will
be pumped  and treated  onsite by air stripping,
with discharge to Rock River, in conjunction
with ground water monitoring. Ground water,
land  use  and  deed  restrictions  will  be
implemented  at  each   site.   The  estimated
present worth cost  for  the Old Landfill site is
$6,059,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
ranging from $71,500 to $174,000.
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Ground water will be treated to  attain Federal
MCLs or State standards.  Surface  water will
meet  State  surface  water  quality  standards.
Chemical-specific   cleanup   goals   were  not
provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented to assure
that future use of the site does not increase the
potential  release  of  hazardous  substances.
Deed and ground water use restrictions for the
area between the  JDF site and the neighboring
Rock River will also be implemented.

KEYWORDS:     Air;  Air  Monitoring;  Air
Stripping;    Arsenic;   Benzene;    Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Direct  Contact;
Floodplain;  Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;    Ground   Water    Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; Metals; No Action
Remedy;  O&M;   Offsite  Discharge; Onsite
Containment; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act;   Solvents; State  Standards/Regulations;
TCE; VOCs.
            K&L LANDFILL, MI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 28, 1990

The  87-acre K&L  Landfill site is an inactive
municipal  landfill  in   Oshtemo  Township,
Kalamazoo  County, Michigan.   Surrounding
land use is rural-residential with several nearby
small lakes and ponds.   The site overlies two
sand  and  gravel aquifers (shallow and  deep),
which  are   not   apparently   hydraulically
connected, but both are  area drinking water
sources.    From  the  early  1960s  to  1979,
approximately 5 million  cubic yards of refuse
and   an  unknown  quantity  of  liquid  and
drummed chemical wastes were accepted at the
landfill.   In  1972,  the State notified the  site
owners to stop accepting chemical wastes,  but
the  request  was  ignored.   Residential well
testing in  1976, 1978, and 1979 revealed ground
water contamination. In 1979, the State ordered
the landfill  to  cease operations,  to supply an
alternate water supply to  affected residents, and
to cover the landfill.  This Record of Decision
(ROD) provides a final remedy and addresses
contaminated  ground  water  in the shallow
aquifer.  The primary contaminants of concern
present in the landfill affecting the soil,  debris,
and ground water are VOCs including benzene,
                                             144

-------
toluene, and xylenes; other organics including
acids, PAHs, PCBs,  and phenols; and metals
including chromium and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  capping  approximately 83 acres of
landfill area with a RCRA multi-layer cap and
installing  gas vents  throughout the landfill;
pumping and onsite treatment of ground water
using   enhanced   bioremediation/fixed-film
bioreactor technology accompanied by aeration;
conducting treatability studies or pilot tests to
ensure  the  effectiveness  of  the  selected
technology; discharging the treated effluent by
either onsite reinjection, discharge to an onsite
filtration pond, or offsite discharge of ground
water to a  publicly  owned  treatment works
(POTW); disposing  offsite  of any resulting
sludge; continued ground water, surface water,
and air monitoring; closure and abandonment
of affected   residential  wells;  implementing
institutional  controls including deed restrictions
to limit ground  water and land  use, and site
access  restrictions  such  as  fencing.     The
estimated  present worth cost of this remedial
action  is $16,407,100,  which  includes a  total
O&M cost of $1,099,900 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Remedial goals  are  based  upon  reduction of
excess life-time cancer risks to 104 to 10"6 for
carcinogens.  For non-carcinogens, the Hazard
Index  (HI)  will be  reduced  to 1  or  less.
Chemical-specific  goals  for   ground   water
include  acetone  700 ug/1   (State), benzene
1.0 ug/1 (State),  toluene 40 ug/1  (State), vinyl
chloride  0.02 ug/1  (State),   xylenes  20 ug/1
(State),  phenols  300 ug/1  (State),  and  lead
5.0 ug/1 (State).

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:      Deed
restrictions limiting ground water and land use
will be implemented.

KEYWORDS: Acids; Aeration; Air Monitoring;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Capping;
Chromium;    Clean    Air    Act;   Closure
Requirements; Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional    Controls;   Landfill   Closure;
Leachability Tests; Lead; MCLGs; MCLs; Metals;
Municipally   Owned   Site;   O&M;   Offsite
Discharge;    Offsite   Disposal;   Onsite
Containment;    Onsite    Discharge;   Onsite
Treatment;  Organics;  PAHs;  PCBs; Phenols;
Publicly Owned Treatment  Works (POTW);
RCRA;  Safe  Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Monitoring;  Toluene;  Treatability  Studies;
Treatment Technology; Venting; VOCs; Xylenes.
   KUMMER SANITARY LANDFILL, MN
        Third Remedial Action - Final
             September 29, 1990

The 35-acre Kummer Sanitary Landfill site is an
inactive  mixed  municipal  waste  landfill  in
Northern   Township,    Beltrami   County,
Minnesota, approximately  one mile west  of
Lake  Bemidji.   A  large residential  area  lies
approximately 1,000 feet east of the  site, and
there  is  a hospital  directly  southwest.   The
privately  owned landfill  was  operated  from
1971 until 1985;  however, business records for
the site are virtually nonexistent. Operations at
the landfill caused the State to take a number
of administrative and  enforcement actions.
Following  the  discovery  of  ground  water
contamination in Northern Township in  1984,
the State  issued  a  public  health  advisory
concerning the  well water  and  provided a
temporary water  supply.    Two  previous
Records of Decision (RODs) in 1985 and  1988
documented  the provision of an alternative
water supply for the Northern municipal water
system as Operable Unit 1 (OU1), and a source
control Operable Unit (OU2), which included a
cover  system  to   control  the   source   of
contamination   (OU3).     This   final   ROD
addresses ground water contamination.   The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are  VOCs  including  benzene,
PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes ground  water pumping and treatment
using advanced oxidation processes (e.g., ozone,
hydrogen peroxide,  or  ultraviolet  light),  and
lime soda softening, as necessary, to precipitate
alkalinity  and  other  inorganic  compounds,
followed by disposal of the precipitate sludge,
polishing  the  effluent stream with granulated
activated  carbon,  and  discharging  treated
ground water to an onsite infiltration  pond;
and  ground  water  monitoring.   Treatability
studies   for   bioremediation  as   a  more
cost-effective remedy are planned; however, the
ROD  will  be amended if the treatment  is
changed to biotreatment. The estimated present
worth   cost   for  this   remedial   action  is
$1,800,000-$6,200,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $240,000-$510,000 for 30 years.
                                             145

-------
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Contaminants of concern in the ground water
will be reduced to meet current and proposed
Maximum   Contaminant   Levels   (MCLs)
including  PCE 5  ug/1  (proposed MCL),  TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL),  and  benzene  5 ug/1  (MCL);
thereby   reducing    cumulative   residual
carcinogenic risk due to ingestion to 10*.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Benzene; Carbon  Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean  Air
Act; Clean Water  Act; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Ground  Water;  Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
MCLs; MCLGs; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment;  PCE;   Plume  Management;  Safe
Drinking Water Act;  TCE; Treatability  Studies;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
       MASTER DISPOSAL SERVICE
              LANDFILL, WI
            First Remedial  Action
             September 26, 1990

The  26-acre Master Disposal Service  Landfill
site  is an  inactive industrial  landfill  in  the
Town  of   Brookfield,   Waukesha   County,
Wisconsin.   The  site  lies within the marshy
floodplain  of  the  Fox River  and  is partially
surrounded by wetlands and drainage channels.
The  site  overlies  a surficial sand/gravel and
dolomite  aquifer  system,  which   has been
contaminated  by  onsite  disposal activities.
Onsite disposal of mainly  industrial  foundry
sands  and  slags  occurred  between 1967 and
1982.  Onsite disposal of  hazardous wastes
including inks, sludge, and solvents was also
observed during  this period.   The site was
partially  closed in  1982, but controlled burning
of wood  waste continued until 1985, when the
site  was permanently closed.   Investigations
completed  in 1990 identified negative impacts
on surface  water  and ground  water from the
landfill  sources.   This  Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses  source  control  as  a  final
remedy  and  management  of  migration  of
ground  water as an  interim  remedy.   A
subsequent   ROD  will   address   the  final
restoration  of the  surficial aquifer system. The
primary  contaminants of concern affecting the
soil,  debris, and ground  water   are  VOCs
including benzene, TCE, toluene, and xylenes;
and  metals including arsenic,  chromium, and
lead.
The  selected  remedial action for  this  site
includes capping  the landfill with a clay/soil
cap and soil cover; installing  an active landfill
gas venting system; pumping and treatment of
ground  water in  the  surficial aquifer system
using filtration and either air stripping, carbon
adsorption, ion exchange or chemical treatment,
based on  the results  of  treatability studies;
discharging the treated water onsite to surface
water; restoring or mitigating any  wetlands
impacted by  this remedial action; conducting
long  term  surface  water  and ground  water
monitoring;   and   implementing  institutional
controls including deed, land use, and ground
water   use   restrictions,   and   site   access
restrictions such  as fencing.   The  estimated
present  worth  cost for this  remedial  action
ranges from  $4,632,000 to  $5,016,000,  which
includes an annual O&M  cost ranging from
$142,730 to $164,130 for 30 years, depending
upon the selected ground water treatment.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Effluent  discharge  limitations  for treated
ground  water  were   calculated  from   State
discharge statutes, and  specify weekly averages
for metal contaminants and monthly  averages
for VOCs, as well as maximum concentration
levels. Chemical-specific goals include benzene
8.5 Ibs/day,  TCE  22 Ibs/day,  toluene  (daily
concentration   level) 17    rng/1,   arsenic
0.045 Ibs/day, chromium (total) 0.034 Ibs/day,
and  lead 0.0096 Ibs/day.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed, land use,
and  ground  water  use restrictions will  be
implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Capping;    Carbon   Adsorption   (GAC);
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Chromium;  Clean
Water Act; Debris;  Direct  Contact; Floodplain;
Ground  Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Interim  Remedy;  Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite  Disposal;  Onsite   Treatment;  Plume
Management;  RCRA;   Soil;  Solvents;   State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies;
VOCs;  Venting;   Water   Quality   Criteria;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
                                             146

-------
       METAMORA LANDFILL, MI
          Second Remedial Action
             September 28,  1990

The  160-acre  Metamora Landfill  site  is  an
inactive, privately owned landfill in Metamora
Township,  Lapeer County,  Michigan.    Both
wetland and woodland areas are present onsite.
The  site is underlain  by   a  shallow  glacial
deposit aquifer, a lower sand  and gravel unit
("the intermediate aquifer"), and the Marshall
Sandstone bedrock aquifer.  Landfill operations
began in  1955 as an  open dump, and the
facility was upgraded in 1969.  Industrial and
municipal  wastes,   including  approximately
35,000 drums, were accepted until the landfill
closed in  1980.   In  1981,  the State sampled
seven drums and identified  several hazardous
materials.   A  1986 Record  of  Decision (ROD)
for Operable  Unit   1   (OU1)  called  for the
excavation  and disposal of the  waste  drums
offsite  at  a  RCRA  incinerator.   This  ROD
addresses  ground water contamination  of the
shallow  aquifer, as  well as the generation of
leachate at the landfill  (OU2).  A third  ROD
will address onsite contaminated subsurface soil
(OU3).  The primary contaminants of concern
in the landfill affecting debris and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, PCE, TCE,
and xylenes; and  metals including  arsenic and
barium.

The  selected  remedial  action for  this  site
includes  pumping and  treatment of ground
water using precipitation/flocculation to remove
inorganic   contaminants,   followed  by   air
stripping and  carbon  adsorption  to remove
organics, and  reinjection of  treated water into
the  shallow   aquifer;  offsite  treatment and
disposal of secondary waste streams including
flocculation sludge and  spent  carbon; capping
the landfill area using a  multi-layer clay cap as
required by the State, and collection and flaring
of landfill  gases; monitoring ground   water;
implementing  institutional   controls  such  as
deed and ground water use restrictions, and
site access  restrictions such as fencing.  The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $19,354,050,  which includes an annual
O&M cost of $856,944 for 20 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific  cleanup  goals  for ground
water are based on Michigan Act 307 rules as
well  as  MCLs and   include benzene 1.0 ug/1
(State), PCE 0.7 ug/1 (State), TCE 3.0 ug/1
(State), xylenes 20 ug/1 (State), and for arsenic
the more  stringent of  0.02 ug/1  (State)  or
background.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:    Deed and
ground   water   use  restrictions   will   be
implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:      Air   Stripping;    Arsenic;
Background Levels; Benzene; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption  (GAC); Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Closure Requirements; Debris;
Direct Contact; Drinking  Water Contaminants;
Ground  Water;  Ground  Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Landfill  Closure; Leachability Tests;  MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment;    Onsite   Containment;   Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe
Drinking   Water   Act;    State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;   Treatability
Studies; Venting; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
 MOSS-AMERICAN KERR-MCGEE OIL, WI
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The  88-acre  Moss-American  Kerr-McGee Oil
site,  a former wood  preserving facility  is in
Milwaukee County,  Wisconsin.  Part of the
facility lies within the 100-year floodplain of
the  Little  Menomonee  River,  which  flows
through  the  site.   A section  of  the site is
wooded, and wetlands are located near the
river  onsite  and  downstream.    A  23-acre
portion  of the  site  is presently  used  as  a
railroad  loading  and   storage  facility  for
automobiles,  and the  remainder of the site is
an  undeveloped  parkland.    An  unconfined
shallow aquifer underlies the site. Beginning in
1921,  onsite  operations  consisted  of  wood
preserving  of railroad ties, poles,  and fence
posts with a mixture of creosote, which is high
in PAHs, and  No. 6 fuel  oil.  The facility
changed  names  and ownership several times
until it ceased operations in 1976. Wastes were
discharged  to onsite settling ponds until  1971,
when wastewater was  discharged into  the
sanitary sewer system. In 1971, several people
received  chemical burns attributed to creosote
while wading three miles downstream of the
site.    This led  to  a State order  requiring
cleanup of onsite settling  ponds  by the site
owner and operator.   In  1973, EPA dredged
5,000  feet of  the river directly downstream of
the site.  During 1977 to 1978, 450  cubic yards
                                             147

-------
of contaminated soil were removed during the
dismantling of the facility.  Studies conducted
before  1980 indicated that extensive  creosote
contamination was present in  the  soil and
ground water onsite as well as in the sediment
of the Little Menomonee River.   This Record
of Decision (ROD) provides a final remedy and
addresses   source   and    ground    water
remediation.   The primary  contaminants  of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, and ground
water are  VOCs  including benzene,  toluene,
and  xylenes;  and  other organics  including
PAHs.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes rerouting  5 miles of the river channel
onsite parallel to the existing channel, followed
by excavating highly contaminated  sediment
from the old channel; mitigating wetland areas;
treating 5,200 cubic yards of river sediment and
80,000 cubic yards of  contaminated onsite soil
using  onsite  soil washing  and   bioslurry
technologies;  separation  and  dewatering  of
residues   followed  by   redeposition  onsite;
covering  treated material with 2 feet  of clean
soil  and  6 inches of  topsoil,  followed  by
revegetation; recycling or treating slurry water
onsite before discharge  to a publicly owned
treatment   works   (POTW)   or  the  river;
constructing a synthetic geomembrane barrier
to prevent movement  of contaminated ground
water into the  river;  collecting ground water
using a drain and interceptor system, followed
by treatment using an oil/water  separator and
granular  activated carbon,  with discharge of
treated water to  a  POTW or  to  the river;
removing pure-phase  liquid wastes for offsite
incineration;  and  ground  water monitoring.
The  estimated  present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial  action is $26,000,000, which  includes
an annual O&M cost of  $130,000 for 10 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Goals are designed to reduce the excess lifetime
cancer risk for carcinogens  to 10"* or less.  For
non-carcinogens, cleanup levels will reduce the
Hazard    Index   (HI)    to    1   or   less.
Chemical-specific   goals  for  ground  water
include  benzene 0,067 ug/1 [State Preventive
Action Level (PAL)],  toluene  68.6 ug/1 (State
PAL), and xylenes 124.0  ug/1 (State PAL).  The
chemical-specific goal  for soil and sediment is
PAHs (carcinogenic) 6.1  mg/kg (State).

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions will be implemented  to  prevent
onsite development.
KEYWORDS:     ARAR  Waiver;   Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land   Application;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC);  Carcinogenic Compounds;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Ground  Water; Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls; O&M; Offsite
Discharge;    Offsite   Treatment;    Onsite
Containment;    Onsite   Disposal;    Onsite
Treatment; Organics;  PAHs;  Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTW);  RCRA; Sediment;
Soil;    Soil    Washing/Flushing;   State
Standards/Regulations;  Toluene;   Treatability
Studies;   Treatment  Technology;   Wetlands;
Xylenes.
  NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, WI
            First Remedial Action
               August 1, 1990

The 325-acre National Presto Industries site is
a former munitions and metal-working facility
in Eau  Claire,  Chippewa County, Wisconsin,
adjacent to the town of Hallie.  From 1942 until
1945,    the   site   was   government-owned,
contractor-operated, and produced  gunpowder
and small arms.  From 1945 to 1980, the site
was owned by National Presto Industries (NPI).
Initial operations were for the manufacture of
cookware  and  consumer  products,   which
generated waste streams consisting of metals,
oils,   grease,  and  spent  solvents.     Also,
beginning in 1951, artillery shell fuses, aircraft
parts, and metal projectiles were produced by
NPI   under   a  military  contract.      Early
waste-handling practices included  the use of
dry wells and seepage pits with overflow from
the pits pumped to a series of lagoons, used as
settling and percolation ponds.  A major waste
steam   generated  from  the   defense-related
activities  was  a  spent  forge  compound,
comprised of mineral  oil, graphite, VOCs, and
asphalt, which accounts for much of the sludge
in the bottom of  one of  the settling ponds.
From 1966 to  1969, the spent forge compound
was  also landfilled onsite.  Subsequently,  the
spent forge compound was recycled as part of
the manufacturing  process.   Based on their
investigations,  EPA required  National  Presto
Industries to provide bottled water to an area
in Hallie, where private wells are contaminated
or threatened by contamination from confirmed
onsite sources.  This Record of Decision (ROD)
provides  for  a  permanent  alternate  water
supply to address the principal threat posed by
the ground water  contamination  at  the site.
                                             148

-------
Future  operable  units  will  address source
control  and ground water remediation.   The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground  water are VOCs including  PCE  and
TCE.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes constructing  a  well  field,  storage
facilities and  distribution  system  to  supply
water to the businesses and residences within
the affected area of the Hallie Sanitary District;
extending  municipal  water service  from the
City of Eau Claire to businesses and residences
within the  affected area  that have annexed to
Eau Claire; closing and abandoning all existing
private wells within the affected area  that draw
from  the contaminated  aquifer; and  annual
monitoring  of  the designated  private wells
immediately outside the  affected area that are
still used as drinking water supply  to ensure
continued  quality of  drinking  water.    The
estimated present worth  cost for this remedial
action  is between  $3,000,000  and $3,200,000,
which includes an estimated annual O&M  cost
of between $48,200 and $120,000, depending on
the size and extent of remediation  required.
The most likely annual O&M cost  is  $90,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
The primary goal of the  EPA  and the State is
to provide  a permanent  and  safe alternate
drinking water supply to the affected area.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:     Alternate  Water   Supply;
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Direct   Contact;
Ground  Water;   Ground  Water  Monitoring;
O&M;  PCE; Safe  Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
      NAVAL INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
         ORDNANCE PLANT, MN
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The   82.6-acre  Naval   Industrial   Reserve
Ordnance Plant (NIROP)  site  is  a  weapons
system   manufacturing  facility  in  Fridley,
Minnesota, which  began  operations in  1940.
The    site    is    a   government-owned,
contractor-operated  plant located just north of
the FMC Corp. Superfund site.   NIROP is
located approximately  30  feet above and 700
feet east  of the Mississippi  River and less than
one mile  upstream from the city of Minneapolis
drinking water  supply  intake.    During  the
1970s,  paint  sludge and  chlorinated solvents
were disposed of onsite in  pits and trenches.
In 1981, State investigations identified  TCE in
onsite  water  supply wells drawing from  the
Prairie DuChien/Jordan aquifer, and the wells
were   shut  down.    In 1983,  EPA  found
drummed waste in the trenches or pits at  the
northern portion  of the site, and  as a result,
during 1983 and 1984,  the Navy authorized an
installation restoration  program, during which
approximately    1,200   cubic    yards    of
contaminated soil and 42 drums were excavated
and landfilled offsite.  In 1987, TCE use at  the
site was discontinued,  but the principal threat
posed by the  site is the continued migration of
TCE via ground water  to the Mississippi River.
This  Record  of  Decision  (ROD)  addresses
remediation  of   a  shallow  ground  water
operable unit. The  need for a second operable
unit  to treat potential  contamination  sources
will  be determined pending the  results  of
additional  investigations.     The   primary
contaminants of  concern affecting  the  ground
water are  VOCs including PCE,  TCE, toluene,
and xylenes.

The selected  remedial  action for the site is a
two-phased approach.  Phase I includes ground
water pumping and pre-treatment, as necessary,
before  disposal  to  a   local publicly  owned
treatment   works   (POTW)   via  an  existing
sanitary   sewer   system;  and   testing   the
recovered  water to assist in the design of Phase
II  treatment  facilities.     Phase  II  includes
treating the recovered  ground water by either
a two-stage air  stripping process, followed by
vapor-phase granular activated carbon (GAC) to
treat air emissions, or  treating ground water
using aqueous-phase GAC, depending on Phase
1 test results; and discharging treated  ground
water into the Mississippi River. Both  options
include disposal  of the treated  effluent offsite
and regenerating the spent carbon at an offsite
facility. The  estimated present worth cost  for
this  remedial action  is  $4,100,000  for  the
GAC-only  option.    O&M  costs  were  not
provided.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Ground water quality  in the unconsolidated
aquifer at  the site will  be restored  to MCLs
or State recommended allowable limits, if more
restrictive.   Because TCE was found with  the
greatest   frequency  and   in   the   highest
concentrations at the site than any  other VOC,
TCE  5.0 ug/1 (MCL) was established  as  the
                                             149

-------
target cleanup  goal  for ground water  in  the
aquifer.  Cleanup levels for recovered ground
water discharged to  the local POTW must  not
exceed 10 mg/1, total VOCs, and individual
VOC  levels must be less  than  3  mg/1 (local
POTW  standards).     Contaminants  in  any
uncaptured portion of the aquifer are  expected
to dissipate by  natural means over time.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:      Air    Stripping;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Clean Air Act; Clean Water
Act;  Direct  Contact;  Ground  Water; Ground
Water  Monitoring; Ground Water  Treatment;
MCLs;   Offsite  Discharge;   PCE;    Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW);  Safe   Drinking  Water  Act;  State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;  VOCs;
Xylenes.
       NL INDUSTRIES/TARACORP
           LEAD SMELTING, IL
           First Remedial Action
               March 30, 1990

The NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelting site
is  an inactive secondary lead  smelting facility
in  a heavily  industrialized  section  of Granite
City,  Madison  County,  Illinois.   Land in the
site vicinity is primarily  industrial, but includes
adjacent  residential  communities,  including
Eagle Park Acres and Venice Township.  Prior
to  1903, the  site was used  for metal refining,
fabricating,  and  other  associated  activities.
From  1903  to 1983, the site was used  for
secondary  lead  smelting   activities.   These
operations generated an  onsite pile of  blast
furnace slag  and battery casing  debris waste
(the  Taracorp pile).  From 1981 to  1983, St.
Louis   Lead   Recyclers,  Inc.  (SLLR)   used
equipment on an adjacent property to recycle
lead-bearing materials from  the Taracorp waste
pile for use in the furnaces  at Taracorp.  Hard
rubber  was  the  end waste  product of this
recycling  process.   In  1983,  both  operations
were   discontinued   and    the   equipment
dismantled.   In  1983,  a State  study of the
Granite City lead  attainment  air  emissions
problem linked emissions from the  onsite lead
smelter and  reclamation operations at the NL
Industries/Taracorp site to the  air  pollution
problem.  Onsite contaminated areas identified
during the study included the 85,000 cubic yard
Taracorp  pile, smaller  adjacent waste   piles
associated  with the SLLR recycling operation
that total 2,450 cubic yards, and 25 to 35 drums
containing  solid  waste from onsite  smelting
operations. Additionally, the adjacent property
contained a 4,000 cubic yard  pile of battery
casing debris  from the SLLR  operation, and
another large contaminated unpaved area was
identified south and west of the site.  Other
contamination  associated       with  the site
included 2,700 cubic  yards of battery casing
material in Eagle Park Acres and an additional
670 cubic yards of similar material  in Venice
Township.   In  1984,  the State  required  the
implementation of remedial actions to improve
air quality.   This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses the Taracorp pile, the  SLLR piles,
and residential soil, alleys, and  driveways that
are contaminated by airborne lead and/or hard
rubber battery  casing material.   The  primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil and
debris is lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this site
includes excavating a  total of  94,820  cubic
yards of lead-contaminated soil and debris from
the SLLR piles, the unpaved area, and  adjacent
residential  areas,  and  hard  rubber  battery
casing material from Venice, Eagle Park Acres,
and other nearby  communities; consolidating
the soil and  debris within the Taracorp pile;
covering  the  Taracorp  pile  with  a  RCRA
multi-media   cap,    and   lining   the
newly-expanded Taracorp pile with a clay liner;
removing  all  onsite  drums  to  an  offsite
secondary  lead  smelter  facility for recovery;
monitoring nearby communities to determine if
additional  areas  need remediation   or  lead
exposures need mitigation; performing  blood
lead  sampling  to  determine  potential  acute
site-associated health effects; monitoring air and
ground  water  during   remedial  activities;
developing  a  contingency  plan  to  provide
remedial action if any nearby  soil  lead levels
exceed  500 mg/kg or  ground water or  air
exceed applicable standards; and implementing
institutional    controls,    including   deed
restrictions, and site access restrictions such as
fencing.  The estimated present worth cost  for
this  remedial  action  is  $30,000,000, which
includes an annual O&M  cost of $35,300 for 30
years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Soil cleanup  levels for  lead  are based on the
"Interim Guidance on Establishing  Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites" (1989).  All
contaminated soil in the unpaved area  adjacent
to the site will be excavated to achieve a lead
                                              150

-------
cleanup   level   of   1,000 mg/kg.      All
contaminated soil in adjacent residential  areas
will be excavated to achieve a cleanup level of
lead 500 mg/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:        Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site to
prevent  disturbance  of the capped Taracorp
pile.

KEYWORDS:     Air  Monitoring;  Capping;
Carcinogenic    Compounds;    Closure
Requirements; Contingency Remedy;  Debris;
Direct  Contact;   Excavation; Ground  Water
Monitoring;  Institutional   Controls;  Landfill
Closure;  Lead; Metals;  Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; RCRA; Soil; State Guidance; State
Standards/ Regulations.
 OCONOMOWOC ELECTROPLATING, WI
            First Remedial Action
             September 20, 1990

The  10.5-acre Oconomowoc Electroplating site
encompasses a  5-acre  active  electroplating
facility and 5 acres of adjacent  wetlands in
Dodge County,  Ashippun, Wisconsin.    The
Oconomowoc Electroplating Company's  (OEC)
facility includes  a main  building that houses
process lines, a wastewater treatment building,
two   formerly   used  wastewater  treatment
lagoons, and various storage tank and container
deposit areas. Recreational facilities, residences,
and businesses that use ground water  for their
drinking  water supply, are in proximity to the
OEC facility. In addition, Davy Creek, a small
creek and  warm  water  sport fishery,  flows
through the wetlands 500 feet south of the site.
Electroplating,   finishing,   and   degreasing
processes performed since 1957 at the OEC
facility produce a multi-source effluent stream
contaminated with  heavy  metals and VOCs.
The  effluent, as  well as  accidental  spills  and
leaks around the  property, have resulted in
widespread site contamination.  Prior  to 1972,
untreated wastewaters were discharged directly
into  the Davy Creek wetlands, and  even after
the  construction  of two  treatment  lagoons,
untreated wastes and  sludge  overflowed the
lagoons and continued to accumulate in the
wetlands. Lagoon sludge removal was  initiated
by OEC in 1979 but was never completed, and
therefore, discharge of  contaminants, including
RCRA-listed hazardous waste (F006), continued
into the wetlands.  An  estimated 10,000 square
yards of wetlands are contaminated with metals
and cyanide. Hazardous waste was also found
in  between  the  walls  and   floor  of  the
wastewater  treatment building (where it was
placed  as  a  sealant),  leaking  from  waste
containers, and spilled in a north parking lot
area.  Due to  its complexity, the site has been
divided  into  four  Operable Units  (OU)  for
remediation: the  surface water, sludge  and
contaminated  soil  associated  with the  two
lagoons  (OU1);  all  other  contaminated soil
around the OEC facility not associated with the
lagoons or  found  beneath the manufacturing
building, including a fill area, a lowlands area,
the drainage ditches and  the parking lot area
(OU2);  the  associated  contaminated  ground
water  (OU3);  and the  highly contaminated
sediment  in the  Davy Creek  wetlands area
(OU4).  All remedial  actions for the operable
units  are final except for OU4, which  is an
interim  action. Further wetland investigation
will  delineate  the final  removal  area.   In
addition,  if  after  further  investigation,  the
building foundation and  underlying soil will
need  remediating,  an  appropriate remedial
action  will  be developed to  accompany  the
wetland   remedial  action.      The  primary
contaminants  of  concern  affecting the soil,
sediment, debris,  sludge, ground  water and
surface water are VOCs including TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; and metals  including chromium
and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this site
includes clean  closing  the lagoon by excavating
650  cubic  yards  of  lagoon  sludge   and
surrounding soil, followed by stabilization and
offsite disposal of the material  and pumping
72,000  gallons of contaminated lagoon water
(which  will be hauled   offsite and treated)
(OU1); excavating 700 cubic yards of soil and
debris  with offsite  treatment  and  disposal
(OU2);  onsite  ground  water  pumping  and
treatment using filtration, ion  exchange,  air
stripping, and  carbon adsorption, followed by
onsite discharge to surface water (a treatability
study  will  be conducted  to  determine  the
effectiveness of  the  ion exchange and  to
determine the  disposition of the resin) (OU3);
excavating 6.000 cubic yards of contaminated
sediment  from  Davy  Creek   and  adjacent
wetlands to a  depth of two feet, followed by
offsite stabilization, treatment, and disposal of
the contaminated  sediment and monitoring of
the area;  and  performing additional bioassay
and risk assessment work to determine final
exposure levels (OU4).  The estimated  present
worth cost for  this remedial action is $7,576,196,
                                             151

-------
which includes an annual O&M cost of $90369.
The present worth costs associated with each of
the four OUs  are  $490,302  (OU1); $258,667
(OU2); $1,831,805 (OU3), which  includes an
annual O&M cost of $90,569; and $4,995,422
(OU4).

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
The lagoon soil excavation levels  for the OEC
site  OU1   will  attain  background   levels
consistent with State and Federal (RCRA) clean
closure  levels;  excavation  of OU2  soil will
attain a  10"6 cumulative carcinogenic risk and a
cumulative HI<1 for noncarcinogens.  Ground
water treatment (OU3) will attain Federal and
State ground water cleanup standards and are
based  on  State  preventative action  limits
(PALs).   Chemical-specific ground water goals
include  chromium 5.0 ug/1 (PAL); and TCE
0.18 (PAL). Cleanup levels for Davy Creek and
adjacent wetlands have not been determined.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping;  Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Closure; Clean Water Act;
Debris;   Direct   Contact;   Drinking   Water
Contamination;   Excavation;  Filling;  Ground
Water;  Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground
Water  Treatment;  Hybrid/Alternate Closure;
Interim Remedy; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals;  O&M;
Offsite  Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;  Onsite
Treatment;   Organics;   Plume  Management;
RCRA;  Safe  Drinking Water Act; Sediment;
Sludge;   Soil;  Solvents;  State Permit;   State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water  Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies;  VOCs; Water
Quality  Criteria; Wetlands;  Xylenes.
 ONALASKA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, WI
        First Remedial Action - Final
              August 14, 1990

The  11-acre Onalaska  Municipal Landfill site
includes  a  7-acre  landfill  owned  by  the
Township of Onalaska,  which  is  located  in
central-western  Wisconsin.  The Black River
and its associated wetlands are 400 feet west  of
the site and lie within a  wildlife and  fish
refuge.  The site was operated as a sand and
gravel quarry until the late 1960s, when it was
converted and  used  as a municipal  landfill
until  1980.  Although the site was primarily
used  for  the  disposal  of municipal  wastes,
solvent  wastes were  also disposed  of  onsite
until 1976.  Approximately 320,000 gallons of
liquid solvent waste and  approximately 1,000
drums of solvent waste  were either burned
with other trash onsite or  poured directly into
holes for burial in the southwestern portion of
the landfill.  The Township capped the landfill
in 1982,  but subsequent onsite  investigations
revealed  ground  water contamination  within
and  around  the  site.   Ground  water  flows
beneath the landfill, where it comes into contact
with solvents leaking from the solvent disposal
area.     The   ground  water  flows  in  a
southwesterly  direction and  a ground  water
contaminant  plume  has  migrated  from the
southwestern edge of the  landfill and appears
to be  discharging into the  wetlands.   This
Record  of Decision  addresses  two operable
units,  the  ground  water  plume  and  the
contaminated soil adjacent to  the southwestern
portion of the landfill, which is a major  source
of ground water  contamination.  The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground  water  are VOCs including benzene,
TCE,  toluene,  and  xylenes;  other  organics
including PAHs; and  metals including arsenic
and lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes   in-situ   bioremediation   of  the
solvent-contaminated  soil  and,  if feasible,  a
portion  of the landfill  debris; pumping  and
treatment of the ground  water plume  using
aeration, clarification, and filtration, followed by
discharge of the treated ground water into the
Black River  and onsite disposal  of the  sludge
generated  during   the   treatment   process;
reconstruction  of   the   landfill   cap  and
installation of a passive methane  gas venting
system to control the  gas buildup under the
cap;   ground   water    monitoring;    and
implementation   of   institutional   controls
including deed  restrictions  limiting ground
water and surface water  use.  The  estimated
present  worth cost for this remedial action  is
$8,000,000, which includes  an annual O&M cost
of $164,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS;
Chemical-specific soil cleanup standards were
not provided but will be  established once the
reduction rate for bioremediation  has been
determined   during   the   pilot-scale    test.
Currently, the  estimated  cleanup goal  is an
80-95%  reduction of the organic contaminant
mass in the  soil.  Ground water at the landfill
waste boundary  will meet SDWA  MCLs or
                                             152

-------
non-zero MCLGs.   Chemical-specific  cleanup
standards for the ground water beyond the site
boundary are based on State cleanup levels and
include benzene 0.067 ug/1, toluene 68.6 ug/1,
xylenes  124 ug/1  TCE  0.18 ug/1,  arsenic
5 ug/1, and  lead 5 ug/1.  The  reconstructed
cap  is  projected  to  reduce   the  rate  of
precipitation  infiltration  by  80%,  thereby
minimizing contaminant migration toward the
ground water.
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions limiting surface and ground  water
use at the site will be implemented.

KEYWORDS:    Aeration;  Arsenic;  Benzene;
Biodegradation;    Capping;   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Ground Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring; Ground  Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
MCLGs; Metal; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Discharge;  Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
Plume  Management;  RCRA; Safe  Drinking
Water    Act;   Soil;    Solvents;    State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;   Toluene;
Treatability  Studies;  Treatment  Technology;
Venting; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
  OTT/STORY/CORDOVA CHEMICAL, MI
          Second Remedial Action
             September 29, 1990

The  Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical  site is  a
former specialty chemical manufacturing facility
in  Dalton   Township,  Muskegon   County,
Michigan.  The site is  at the headwaters of a
small, unnamed tributary of Little Bear Creek,
which flows southeast of the site approximately
one-half mile away to  Muskegon River, three
miles to  the south.  The site operated from
1957  to   1985  under  a   series  of  owners.
Chemical    products   manufactured   onsite
included    intermediate    items   used    in
manufacturing   pharmaceuticals,   dyestuffs,
agricultural   chemicals,  diisocyanates,  and
herbicides.  For at least ten years, production
vessel clean-out wastes and wastewaters were
discharged  to  onsite  unlined  lagoons  and
allowed to dissipate into soil.  In subsequent
years, wastes were  also drummed and stored
onsite.  In the early 1960s, the State noted signs
of water  and soil contamination.  Site owners
attempted   to  manage  the  ground  water
contaminant plumes emanating from the site,
but the effectiveness of  these  measures was
uncertain. In 1977, the State negotiated with a
new site owner to remove several  thousand
drums,  thousands of cubic yards  of  lagoon
sludge,  and  to  destroy  or  to  neutralize
phosgene gas left onsite.  In 1982, an alternate
water supply was undertaken and financed in
part by the State and  a former owner.   A
Record of Decision (ROD), signed in 1989 and
reaffirmed  in  1990   after  additional  public
comment,  addressed  Operable  Unit  1  (OU1),
the contamination of the nearby Little  Bear
Creek system.   This  ROD addresses  aquifer
restoration.  A subsequent ROD  will address
remaining threats posed  by the contaminated
soil  areas  at  the  site.     The  primary
contaminants of concern  affecting the  ground
water  are  VOCs  including  benzene,  1,2
dichloroethane,  PCE,  TCE,   toluene,  vinyl
chloride, and xylenes;  other organics  including
pesticides; and metals including arsenic.

The  selected  remedial   action for  this  site
includes  installing and  operating  extraction
wells in a  phased approach to restore  the
aquifer  and prevent  degradation of  useable
ground  water  downgradient  of the  plume;
pumping and treatment of ground water in the
shallow and deeper zones of the aquifer system
using physical-chemical  treatment   including
UV-oxidation, air stripping, biological treatment
such    as   activated   sludge,    and/or
filtration/adsorption such as granular activated
carbon as  determined in  the  design  phase;
discharging  the treated effluent in the  nearby
stream;  installing a ground water monitoring
system  to  demonstrate  the  effectiveness  of
restoration;  and  implementing  institutional
controls,  such  as  deed  restrictions to  limit
ground  water  use.   The  estimated  present
worth   cost  for  this   remedial  action  is
$26,000,000,  which includes an annual O&M
cost of $1,400,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup goals  include benzene
1 ug/1 (10"6  cancer risk level), toluene 40  ug/1
(State standard), TCE  3 ug/1 (10* cancer risk
level), and  xylenes 20 ug/1 (State  standard).
Effluents  must  meet limitations for  stream
discharge as administered by the State.

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions  or   other  controls   will   be
implemented to limit current and future uses of
ground  water  at  and downgradient  of  the
facility.
                                             153

-------
KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon  Adsorption   (GAC);  Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean  Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct  Contact;  Floodplain;   Ground  Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground   Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals;
O&M;   Offsite   Discharge;   Organics;  PCE;
Pesticides;  Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking    Water   Act;   State
Standards/Regulations; TCE;  Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
              PRISTINE, OH
  First Remedial  Action (Amendment) - Final
              March 30, 1990

The 2-acre Pristine site is in Reading, Hamilton
County,  Ohio.    The  site  is  bordered  by
industrial and  residential  areas, including a
trailer park three hundred feet northeast of  the
site.  Eight municipal supply wells serving  the
citizens  of  Reading are  located approximately
300 feet  northwest of the site.  Prior to  1974,
this  site was used  for the  manufacture  of
sulfuric   acid.    Subsequently, Pristine  began
liquid waste disposal operations at the site, and
in 1977, obtained a permit to operate an onsite
liquid waste incinerator.  An onsite concrete
lined pit (the magic pit) was used to store and
treat hazardous  materials during liquid waste
disposal    operations.       In   1979,   State
investigations  identified as  many  as 8,000 to
10,000 drums and  several thousand gallons of
liquid wastes onsite.  Types of waste included
acids, solvents, pesticides, and PCBs.  Over 90
hazardous compounds were detected onsite in
the soil, ground water, surface water, sediment,
and  debris  as  a  result   of  past  disposal
activities. In 1981, the State ordered all onsite
disposal  operations  to cease.  From 1980 to
1983, EPA  and Pristine removed onsite wastes
including paint  and solvent sludge,  solvents,
pesticides, organics, PCB-contaminated soil, and
incinerator  ash.    During   1984,  the  PRPs
removed contaminated  soil  and  waste  as a
means to address  the immediate site hazards.
A 1987  Record of Decision  (ROD)  documents
the selection of in-situ vitrification of the upper
12 feet   of  soil  across  the site.    This  ROD
amends the soil component remedy of the 1987
ROD  from in-situ vitrification to  incineration
and  soil  vapor  extraction.    The  primary
contaminants  of concern  affecting the soil,
sediment, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, PCE, TCE, and xylenes;
other organics including dioxin and pesticides
such as DDT; metals including lead, chromium,
and arsenic; and other inorganics.

The selected amended remedial action for this
site includes excavating  and incinerating the
top one foot of contaminated soil  from across
the site (a total of 3,598 cubic yards) and 1,799
cubic yards of contaminated soil to a  depth of
four feet  in areas  that  contain  semi-volatile
organic compounds and pesticides in excess of
performance goals; incinerating 600 cubic yards
of contaminated sediment and 1,125 cubic yards
of contaminated soil surrounding the magic pit;
testing the residual ash  and placing  the ash
onsite  if  it  meets  standards  for  delisting;
performing in-situ soil vapor extraction with an
off-gas control  system to extract  VOCs from
onsite soil to a depth of 12 feet; dewatering the
upper  aquifer, and onsite  treatment of the
extracted   ground   water   using   carbon
adsorption;  capping  the  soil with  a  RCRA
multi-layer  cap; pumping and treatment of
ground water  from   the  lower  and  upper
aquifer and lower outwash  lens of the upper
aquifer   using  air   stripping  and   carbon
adsorption;  decontaminating  and demolishing
all onsite structures and disposing of the debris
offsite;   monitoring   ground   water;   and
implementing institutional controls including
deed  restrictions, and site  access restrictions
such as fencing. The estimated present worth
cost for  this  remedial action  is  $13,500,000,
which includes an O&M cost of $6,000,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific goals for soil/sediment were
based on a cumulative 10"6 incremental lifetime
cancer risk of eleven indicator  compounds
including aldrin 15 ug/kg, benzene 116 ug/kg,
chloroform  2,043  mg/kg,   DDT  487 ug/kg,
1,2-DCA   19 ug/kg,   1,1-DCE   285 ug/kg,
dieldrin  6 ug/kg,  PAHs  14 ug/kg,  dioxin
0 ug/kg,    PCE   3,244 ug/kg,   and   TCE
175 ug/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Capping;   Carbon    Adsorption    (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Debris;  Decontamination; Dioxin;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Ground    Water    Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal  Destruction;  Inorganics;
                                             154

-------
Institutional  Controls;  Lead;  MCLs;  Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite  Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics;  PCE; Pesticides;  RCRA;
ROD Amendment;  Safe Drinking Water  Act;
Sediment;  Soil;  State  Standards/Regulations;
TCE;    Treatability    Studies;   Treatment
Technology;  VOCs; Water Quality  Criteria;
Xylenes.
        REILLY TAR & CHEMICAL
            (ST. LOUIS PARK), MN
           Third Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 80-acre Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis
Park) site is a former coal tar distillation and
wood  preserving  plant  in  St.  Louis  Park,
Minnesota. The site overlies a complex system
of aquifers, including the St. Peter aquifer that
provide drinking water to area residences.  The
St. Peter Aquifer contains one municipal well,
which is used during periods of peak demand,
however, the majority of the drinking water in
St. Louis Park is obtained from deeper aquifers.
Surrounding  land use is primarily residential.
From  1917  to  1972,  wastewater  containing
creosote and  coal tar was discharged to onsite
surface water, and as a result, small wastewater
spills occured into onsite soil.  In  1972,  the site
was  purchased  by the  city  in  response to
complaints about  wastewater  contamination,
and   the  plant   was   dismantled.     State
investigations from  1978  to  1981  identified
site-related ground water contamination.  Two
previous Records of Decision (RODs)  in 1984
and  1986 addressed  remediation of  specific
aquifers, the  filling of a  small onsite wetland,
and  offsite  soil  contamination.   This  ROD
addresses Operable Unit 4 (OU4), remediation
of the St. Peter aquifer.  A  subsequent  ROD
will  address  any remaining  site  problems as
OU3.  The primary contaminants of concern
affecting  the  ground   water  are  organics
including PAHs and phenols.

The   selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes pumping an  existing well screened
within  the   St. Peter  aquifer  and   initially
discharging  the extracted  water  offsite  to  a
publicly owned treatment works (POTW); and
ground water monitoring. Within 3 to 5 years,
direct onsite discharge to surface water will be
conducted if  NPDES permit requirements can
be met.   If requirements are not met, onsite
treatment,  possibly using granular  activated
carbon,  will  be  conducted  prior  to  onsite
discharge.  The estimated capital cost  for this
remedial  action   is  $225,000  to  $250,000,
depending on the need  for  onsite treatment.
Annual O&M costs are estimated at $60,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Extracted  ground  water  must  meet  NPDES
discharge  requirements for both discharge to a
POTW and to surface water.  Chemical-specific
levels include carcinogenic PAHs 70 ug/1, other
PAHs 17 ug/1, and phenols 10 ug/1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.

KEYWORDS:    Carbon   Adsorption  (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean  Water  Act;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground  Water
Treatment;  O&M; Offsite Discharge;  Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics;  PAHs; Phenols; Plume Management;
Publicly  Owned  Treatment  Works  (POTW);
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Wetlands.
    SANGAMO/CRAB ORCHARD NWR
                (USDOI), IL
          Second Remedial Action
               August 1, 1990

The  Sangamo/Crab Orchard  NWR  (USDOI)
site,  in the Crab Orchard  National  Wildlife
Refuge, is near Carterville, Illinois. Within the
refuge,  lakes  and adjacent  wetlands support
recreational activities on the western portion of
the refuge, while the eastern portion is used for
manufacturing purposes.  The Department of
Defense (DOD), the original administrator of
the refuge,  leased  portions of the refuge to
munitions and explosives manufacturers who
continue  to  operate   onsite.  In   1947,  DOD
transferred the administration  of the refuge to
the Department of the Interior (DOI). DOI also
leased portions of the refuge to manufacturers
of PCB transformers and capacitors, automobile
parts, fiberglass boats, plated metal parts, and
jet engine  starters.  Solid wastes generated from
these  industrial activities were disposed of in
onsite landfills while  other liquid  wastes may
have  been  discharged  into  nearby  surface
waters and impoundments.  EPA  has divided
the site into  four operable units.  The  first
operable unit,  documented  in a  March 1990
Record  of  Decision   (ROD),  addressed  the
metal-contaminated areas. The second operable
unit is documented in this ROD and focuses on
the PCB-contaminated soil and  sediment in four
                                             155

-------
sites including the Job Corps Landfill (site 17),
an inactive 1-acre landfill containing 1,400 cubic
yards  of  contaminated  material;  the  Water
Tower Landfill  (site  28),  an  inactive  1-acre
landfill  containing   100   cubic  yards   of
contaminated material; the Area 9 Landfill (site
32), an inactive 2.5-acre landfill; and the Area
9   Building   Complex   (site  33),    where
contaminated runoff from an industrial building
complex discharges into two drainage ditches.
The  Area 9  Landfill  and  Building  Complex
together   contain   36,000   cubic  yards   of
contaminated  material.     Two   additional
operable  units will be addressed in a  future
ROD.  The  primary contaminants of concern
affecting   soil  and  sediment  are  organics
including PCBs and metals including lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes   excavation   and   treatment   of
PCB-contaminated  soil  and sediment  using
incineration  or  in-situ  vitrification  (ISV),  if
appropriate,   and   stabilization/fixation   of
incineration   residues   and   non-incinerated,
metal-contaminated soil and sediment, followed
by onsite disposal in a RCRA-permitted landfill;
backfilling, capping, and closure of excavated
areas and  areas where  contamination is  below
the    excavation   criteria;   environmental
monitoring including  ground   water, surface
water,    and    leachate   monitoring;   and
implementation   of   institutional    controls
including  land use and transfer restrictions.
ISV, an innovative treatment technology, will
substitute   for  incineration if  a  successful
demonstration of the technology is made. The
estimated  present worth cost for this remedial
action  is $25,000,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $379,701  for 30 years.  If  ISV  is
used, the estimated present worth cost of  this
remedial   action will  be  $17,080,215,   which
includes an annual O&M cost  of $201,800.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil  and  sediment contaminated  above  the
established remediation goals will be excavated
and  treated.   Soil  remediation  goals include
PCBs   1  mg/kg  for  the  top  12  inches  of
surficial soil, PCBs 25 mg/kg for soil below 12
inches,  and   lead 450 mg/kg.    Sediment
remediation  goals  include  PCBs 0.5 mg/kg.
Soil and sediment  remediation goals are based
on the risk assessment, a 10* excess cancer risk
level, and an HI=1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Land use and
transfer restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS:       Capping;   Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean Air Act; Clean  Closure;
Clean Water  Act;  Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground    Water    Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls;   Lead;   Metals;   O&M;   Onsite
Containment;    Onsite   Disposal;   Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; RCRA; Sediment;
Soil;    Solidification/Stabilization;   State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface   Water
Monitoring;  Toxic  Substances  Control   Act-
Treatment Technology;  Vitrification.
       SPIEGELBERG LANDFILL, MI
       Second Remedial Action - Final
               June 29, 1990

The  115-acre Spiegelberg  Landfill  site  is an
active  sand, peat, and  gravel mining site in
Green  Oak  Township,  Livingston  County,
Michigan.  Surrounding the site are several
residences and small businesses which rely on
onsite  non-municipal  water sources for their
drinking   water  supply.   In  addition,  the
Rasmussen Superfund site neighbors the  site to
the east.  From 1966 to 1977, a 2.5-acre portion
of the site was  used  to  dispose of  septic,
domestic, and industrial wastes, including paint
sludge.  Site investigations  revealed two areas
of concern,  a paint  sludge disposal  area,
Operable Unit I (OU I) and a ground  water
plume (OU II), contaminated as a result of the
paint sludge disposal area.  The  paint sludge
disposal  area was addressed in a 1986 Record
of Decision (ROD), and all wastes associated
with  the  paint  sludge  disposal  area  were
removed, including the paint sludge and debris,
the  contaminated  soil  underlying the  paint
waste, liquid paint, laboratory liquid waste, and
gas cylinders.  This second ROD focuses  on the
resulting  ground  water   plume,  which  is
estimated to contain 3,770,000 cubic feet of
contaminated ground  water.   Although the
contaminated ground water plume has not yet
migrated beyond  the site boundary, continued
migration of the plume poses a threat to water
supply wells north and northwest of the  site.
The  primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes; and metals including lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for this  site
includes  ground water pumping and treatment
using chemical precipitation and pH adjustment
to remove  inorganics, biological  treatment to
remove organics, and air stripping and granular
                                             156

-------
activated carbon  to  remove residual organic
contamination, followed by onsite discharge of
treated   water   to   the   ground   water;
implementing  institutional controls including
deed restrictions;  and ground and well water
monitoring.  The  estimated present worth cost
for the remedial action  is $4,420,000 which
includes  a  present  worth  O&M   cost  of
$2,000,000 over at least 5 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific  ground  water cleanup goals
include benzene  1.2 ug/1 (based on a  10*
cancer  risk level), toluene 40 ug/1  (based on
taste and odor thresholds), and  lead  5.0 ug/1
(based  on human lifecycle safe concentrations).

INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions  and other institutional controls, as
necessary, will be implemented to ensure the
integrity of the remedial action.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Absorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring;    Ground    Water    Treatment;
Institutional Controls;  Lead;  Metals; O&M;
Onsite  Discharge; Onsite  Treatment; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe  Drinking Water Act;
State Standards/Regulations; Toluene; VOCs;
Xylenes.
   SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP DUMP, MI
        First Remedial Action - Final •
             September 29, 1990

The 16-acre Springfield Township Dump site is
in Davisburg, Springfield Township, Michigan.
The  site is comprised of an open field  area
surrounded  by  dense woods.   Surrounding
land use is mixed agricultural and residential.
The  site overlies both a shallow  and deep
aquifer, and there are several wetlands adjacent
to the  site.  A 4-acre portion of the site was
used for industrial waste disposal between 1966
and  1968.  Unknown  quantities of industrial
waste were drained into  onsite excavated pits
in a  central disposal area or deposited on low
ground areas.   Random  dumping of refuse
occurred onsite, and many drums  containing
liquid  wastes  were  seen  scattered  throughout
the woods. In 1978, the State identified PCBs,
paint sludge, solvents, oils, and greases in 1,500
onsite  drums.  State  studies also  determined
that a portion of the aquifer underlying the site
was highly susceptible to contamination, due to
the absence of a clay layer.  In 1979 and 1980,
VOC-contaminated  well water was found at
private residences near  the site.  In 1979, the
State ordered the 1,500 onsite drums removed
and disposed of off site. From 1979 to 1980, 711
tons of contaminated soil  were excavated and
removed from several onsite areas including
the centrally located disposal pits.  Because of
limited funding,  some wastes remained onsite,
but the pits  were subsequently filled  in and
regraded.   In 1980, the State identified onsite
PCB-  and  DDT-contaminated soil and onsite
VOC-contamination in  ground  water.   This
Record    of   Decision   (ROD)   addresses
remediation of onsite  contaminated soil and
ground water and will  be a  final remedy for
the site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are VOCs
including  TCE  and toluene; other organics
including  PCBs;  and metals  including  arsenic,
chromium, and lead.

The selected  remedial action  for  this site
includes excavating and treating onsite a total
of  11,820   cubic  yards of VOC-  and  other
organic-contaminated soil  by  incineration, and
solidifying   the    resulting   ash;   treating
metal-contaminated soil using solidification and
redepositing the  treated soil and ash onsite or
temporarily storing  the treated soil onsite in a
solid waste unit; treating remaining soil  using
in-situ vacuum  extraction and  performing a
treatability study to determine its effectiveness;
ground  water pumping and treatment  using
carbon  adsorption,   followed   by   onsite
reinjection  of the treated  ground  water; and
implementing site access  restrictions,  such as
fencing. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial  action   is  $9,271,290,   which
includes an annual O&M cost of $97,659.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Soil remediation  goals  are  based  on  a 10*
cancer risk  and  State  Michigan  Act  307
Standards.  Chemical-specific soil cleanup levels
include  PCBs 1  mg/kg,  toluene 0.08 mg/kg,
and TCE 0.08 mg/kg.  Ground  water  will  be
remediated to meet or exceed SDWA  Federal
MCLs or  MCLGs including toluene 0.4  mg/1
(MCL) and TCE 0.003 mg/1 (MCL). Lead and
arsenic will be remediated  to background levels
for both soil and ground water.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not provided.
                                             157

-------
KEYWORDS:    Arsenic;  Background  Levels;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Direct
Contact;  Excavation;  Ground Water;  Ground
Water   Treatment;    Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;  Lead;  MCLGs;  MCLs;  Metals;
O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Safe Drinking Water
Act;  Soil;  Solidification/Stabilization;  State
Standards/Regulations;   Temporary   Storage;
TCE;  Toluene;  Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum  Extraction; VOCs.
          ST. LOUIS RIVER, MN
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 230-acre St. Louis River site (also known as
the St. Louis River/Interlake Duluth Tar site) is
on the north  bank of the St.  Louis River in
Duluth, Minnesota, with  portions of  the  site
within the 100-year floodplain.  The bank of
the river  consists  of  a  series  of  inlets and
peninsulas,  including the Stryker Embayment
and the boat slip inlets. This site is the former
location of several pig iron and coking plants,
as well as separate tar and chemical companies,
which used byproducts from the plants.  The
chemical companies closed in  the 1940s, and
the pig iron coking plants closed during the
1960s.  Tar  seeps are present onsite  in  several
locations,  including the embayment and boat
slip areas where tar producers had disposed of
tars   directly  onto  the  ground.   Soil and
underlying ground water are contaminated with
high  levels of PAHs as a result of past onsite
disposal activities. Chemicals released from the
sediment  are  the source  of a  thick layer of
tar-like material in  portions of  the embayment
and boat  slip areas.  This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses Operable Unit 1  (OU1), the
remediation of the  onsite tar seeps,  which are
a potential source of ground water and surface
water contamination.    A future  ROD will
include a treatability study  to address  the
contamination  of the soil, sediment,  ground
water, and surface water at the site  (OU2).
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil are organics including  PAHs.

The   selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating 300-2300  cubic  yards of
visible  tar  seeps with offsite  disposal  to a
power  plant or  a  similar facility  for  use as
recyclable fuel, and landfilling the tar and ash
residues  offsite.    This  ROD  provides  a
contingency for incineration of up  to  10% of
the materials at a  RCRA  incinerator if the
power plant  will not accept the contaminated
soil/tar mixture.  The estimated present worth
cost  for  this  remedial action ranges  from
$700,000 to $2,700,000, depending on the extent
of excavation required.  There are no O&M
costs  associated with this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No   chemical-specific   goals  are   provided;
however,  this remedial action will  reduce the
current excess lifetime cancer risk for  ground
water  to  acceptable   levels   and  prevent
migration  of contaminants to  surface  and
ground water.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Carcinogenic  Compounds; Clean
Air Act; Clean Water Act; Contingent Remedy;
Direct   Contact;    Excavation;   Floodplain;
Incineration; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment;
Organics;    PAHs;   RCRA;    Soil;    State
Standards/Regulations.
         TRI-STATE PLATING, IN
         First Remedial Action - Final
               March  30, 1990

The 3,900-square foot Tri-State Plating site is an
abandoned metal plating facility in Columbus,
Bartholomew County, Indiana.  Land use in the
vicinity of the site is residential and industrial.
Metal  plating  operations  at  the  site  began
during the 1940s.  Tri-State Plating operated the
facility from 1981  until 1984, when  operations
were shut down and the site abandoned.  Site
features  include an electroplating building and
an  onsite storage building.   In 1983, the State
identified soil  contaminated  with  chromium,
lead, and other metals, which was thought to
be  a result  of an onsite waste spill.  Tri-State
Plating excavated the  contaminated soil  and
placed it in onsite drums.   Subsequently, the
State identified additional onsite contaminated
soil and  elevated levels of chromium in offsite
ground  water, and  determined  that  facility
wastes had been discharged directly into the
sewer line.  In 1984, following additional onsite
waste disposal  violations, onsite spills, and the
failure of Tri-State Plating to install an onsite
waste  treatment  system,  the  State  blocked
sewers  from the  site and  cut off  the water
supply.  From 1987 to 1989, in two separate
actions,  EPA removed 27 drums of inorganic
material from the storage building, excavated
                                              158

-------
contaminated onsite soil, decontaminated and
demolished  all  onsite structures, filled and
revegetated the excavated areas,  and disposed
of the  soil  and  debris  in  offsite  landfills.
Subsequent  site investigations revealed that
ground water beneath and migrating from the
site was contaminated with metals and required
remediation.     Previous   removal  actions
successfully  reduced  metal concentration  in
onsite  soil  to  background  levels; therefore,
onsite soil does not warrant remedial  action.
This  ROD addresses the contaminated  onsite
ground  water.   The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are metals
including chromium.

The  selected  remedial   action  for  this  site
includes pumping  contaminated ground  water
from the underlying aquifer and  discharging
the water to a publicly owned treatment  works
(POTW); monitoring ground water and surface
water; conducting a public education program;
and implementing institutional controls and site
access  restrictions  including  fencing.    The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action ranges from $1,110,000 to  $1,115,000 for
2-10  years,  depending on the ground  water
pumping rate.  O&M costs were not provided
for this  remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Pumping of ground water will continue until
contaminant  levels meet State  and Federal
standards including chromium 50 ug/1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Ground  water
usage will be restricted until remediation has
been completed.

KEYWORDS:      Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Chromium;  Clean  Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking  Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
MCLs;  MCLGs;  Metals;  Offsite Discharge;
Offsite Treatment;  Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); RCRA;  Safe Drinking  Water
Act; State Standards/Regulations; Surface  Water
Monitoring.
    UNION SCRAP IRON METAL, MN
        First Remedial Action - Final
              March 30, 1990

The Union Scrap Iron Metal site is a vacant
industrial  property  in Minneapolis, Hennepin
County,  Minnesota.   The site  overlies  an
alluvial aquifer.    Surrounding  land  use is
primarily  industrial  and  commercial,  with
adjacent residential areas. From the early 1970s
until 1983, the site  was used as a  processing
facility for used batteries and  scrap metal.
Batteries were crushed and recyclable materials
were sorted onsite.  Several  piles of crushed
battery casings and electrical equipment  were
present onsite at various  times.   Intermittent
investigations conducted from 1980  to  1987
identified contaminated soil onsite as a result of
these   processing   activities.     In   1987,  a
potentially responsible party removed 773 tons
of battery casing material  from the  site.  Two
subsequent  EPA  removal  actions  in  1988
included the excavation and offsite disposal of
onsite  contaminated  soil,  an  underground
storage tank, debris, a concrete  pad, and an
onsite  building.    A  1989 to 1990 remedial
investigation  determined  that prior  removal
actions    were    effective    in    eliminating
contaminated onsite soil and  waste,  and the
low level ground water contamination does not
pose any  threat  to public  health.   Therefore,
there are no contaminants of concern affecting
this site.

The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action.  Previous site removal activities
have  reduced onsite  contaminant  levels to
below background or EPA health-based levels.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy.
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MN
        First Remedial Action - Final
               June 11, 1990

The University of Minnesota site, composed of
four subsites, is in Rosemount, Dakota County,
Minnesota, approximately 20 miles southeast of
the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan  area.
Surrounding land use is agricultural and rural
residential. The site is underlain by a shallow
                                             159

-------
sand and gravel aquifer and a deeper fractured
dolomite   and   sandstone   aquifer,   both
hydraulically connected and current sources of
drinking water.  Three of the  subsites  were
occupied by tenants between approximately
1968  and  1985.    All three  subsites  were
involved    with    the    storage   and/or
reconditioning  of  electrical  equipment  and
contain PCB-contaminated  soil and debris from
spills or disposal  of PCB oil.  One subsite was
also involved with reclamation of copper wire.
The fourth subsite was used by the University
as a burn pit for  waste chemicals.  From 1968
to 1974, it  is estimated that 90,000 gallons of
laboratory chemicals, solvents, corrosives, salts,
heavy metals,  organics, and inorganics  were
disposed  of in  the  burn  pit,  which  was
ultimately capped in 1980.   In  1984, ground
water sampling identified the burn pit as a
source  of  contamination.     In  1986,  the
University  submitted  plans  for  an alternate
water supply for affected residents.  This action
has  been  updated  and is addressed  in this
Record  of  Decision (ROD).   This ROD  also
addresses ground water treatment in the burn
pit area and treatment and consolidation of
contaminated soil and  debris in  the remaining
three subsites.  The primary contaminants of
concern affecting  the soil, debris,  and ground
water are  VOCs including chloroform;  other
organics including  PCBs;  and metals such as
lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for this site
includes excavating  2,620 cubic yards of soil
containing  greater  than 1,000 mg/kg of  lead
and transporting  the soil  to  an offsite  RCRA
landfill for disposal; excavating 160 cubic yards
of concrete debris and 6,309 cubic yards of soil
with greater than 25 mg/kg of PCBs, followed
by  onsite  thermal  desorption  and   fume
incineration; consolidating  14,809 cubic yards of
soil with  10-25 mg/kg of PCBs and limiting
access  with man-made  barriers;  backfilling
excavations with  treated soil  and grading and
revegetating the  area;  pumping and treating
contaminated  ground  water using a  packed
tower air stripper, followed by onsite discharge
to  an infiltration supply  pond; and  ground
water monitoring.   Outside  of  the selected
remedy,  the  University of   Minnesota  is
constructing two supply  wells  upgradient of
the  contaminant  plume  and  supplying 27
affected  residents  with   this  alternate   water
supply.  The combined estimated capital cost
for both remedies is $8,308,686.   There are no
O&M costs associated with  the soil remedy.
The estimated annual O&M cost for the ground
water remedy is $8,695 for 20 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Cleanup levels for carcinogenic compounds are
meant to reduce the excess lifetime cancer risk
to 104  to  10"7.   Specific  soil cleanup  goals
include  PCBs  25 mg/kg  (TSCA  PCB  "Spill
Cleanup Policy") and  lead 1,000  mg/kg (EP
Toxicity Leach Testing).  Specific ground water
cleanup goals for VOCs were  also  provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:    Air  Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean Air  Act; Debris;  Direct
Contact;   Drinking  Water   Contaminants;
Excavation;   Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Ground    Water    Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction;  Leachability
Tests; Lead;  MCLs;  MCLGs; Metals;  O&M;
Offsite  Disposal;   Onsite  Discharge; Onsite
Disposal;  Onsite  Treatment;  Organics; PCBs;
RCRA;  Safe  Drinking Water  Act; Soil;  State
Standards/Regulations;    Toxic   Substances
Control  Act;  Treatment Technology; VOCs.
          WAYNE WASTE OIL, IN
        First Remedial Action - Final
               March  30, 1990

The 30-acre Wayne Waste  Oil site is a  former
oil reclamation operation and municipal landfill
in Columbia City, Indiana.  The site lies within
the Blue River floodplain, and a wetlands area
is  located  onsite.     The  site  overlies   a
contaminated unconsolidated surficial aquifer.
From  1953 to  1970,  part of  the  site  was
operated as a municipal landfill.  From 1975 to
1982, waste oil reclamation activities,  which
included the storage and handling of hazardous
wastes  were conducted  onsite.   Site features
include an incinerator,  onsite  disposal  pits,
buried  drums,  vacant office buildings,  and
several above-ground and underground storage
tanks, which contain hazardous material. From
1979 to 1980,  an estimated 250,000  gallons of
hazardous waste were illegally dumped onsite
and allowed  to percolate  into the soil.   In
addition the current landfill cap is not adequate
to prevent exposure of buried landfill material.
Removal  actions  by  potentially responsible
parties  (PRPs)  in  1986  and 1988 resulted  in
remediation of several  onsite disposal pits, and
the removal and offsite disposal of 340 buried
drums,  the contents of 23 storage tanks,  over
                                              160

-------
12,900 tons of contaminated soil from the onsite
pits,  and   implementation   of  site  access
restrictions.   Site  investigations by  the  PRP
under  a Consent  Order from  1988  to 1989,
characterized  the   location   and  extent  of
remaining contaminated media, and quantified
the chemical contaminants at the site.  The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, debris,  and  ground water  are VOCs
including  benzene, PCE, TCE,  toluene,  and
xylenes; other organics including  PAHs and
phenols;  and   metals   including   arsenic,
chromium, and lead.

The selected  remedial  action  for  this   site
includes treating VOC-contaminated soil using
vapor extraction; treating metals-contaminated
soil    using   soil   washing   or
solidification/stabilization; delineating the area
of the  municipal landfill;  capping  the landfill
and constructing a landfill venting system if
necessary; covering PAH-contaminated  soil or
consolidating the soil under  the landfill  cap;
treating and  disposing  of   the  contents  of
storage  tanks  offsite,  steam cleaning,  and
removing the storage tanks offsite; dismantling
the incinerator and  disposing  of  the debris
offsite or within the onsite municipal landfill;
pumping and treatment of ground water onsite
using air stripping, or discharging  the ground
water offsite to a publicly  owned treatment
works (POTW); monitoring air, ground water,
and  surface   water;   and   implementing
institutional  controls including deed, land use,
and ground  water use restrictions,  and  site
access  restrictions  such  as  fencing.    The
estimated present worth cost for this  remedial
action is $5,582,499, which includes an  annual
O&M cost of $291,000 for 15 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Cleanup levels for soil will be calculated using
a   contaminant   leaching    model.
Chemical-specific  cleanup levels  for ground
water are based on Federal MCLs and  non-zero
MCLGs including benzene 5  ug/1 (MCL),  PCE
5 ug/1  (MCL), TCE  5 ug/1  (MCL), toluene
2,000 ug/1    (MCL),   xylenes    10,000 ug/1
(proposed MCL), and arsenic  50 ug/1 (MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Deed, ground
water,   and   land   use  restrictions  will  be
implemented onsite.

KEYWORDS:  Air Monitoring;  Air Stripping;
Arsenic;   Benzene;  Capping;   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water  Act;  Debris; Direct Contact;  Drinking
Water   Contaminants;  Floodplain;   Ground
Water;  Ground Water Monitoring;  Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure;  Leachability  Tests;  Lead;  MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal;    Offsite   Treatment;   Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE;
Pesticides; Phenols; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); RCRA; Safe  Drinking  Water
Act;    Soil    Washing/Flushing;    Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization;   State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Monitoring;  TCE;  Toluene;  Toxic Substances
Control Act;  Treatability  Studies; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; Venting; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
            WHEELER PIT, WI
        First Remedial Action - Final
            September 28, 1990

The  3.4-acre Wheeler Pit site  is a  former
industrial   waste  disposal  pit  in  LaPrairie
Township,  approximately  1-1/2  miles  from
Janesville, Wisconsin.  The soil beneath the site
is  generally  sand   and  gravel,   and  the
uppermost aquifer, also composed of sand and
gravel, serves  as a major source of drinking
water for the Janesville area. From 1900 to the
1970s, the site  was used as a sand and gravel
pit  by a railroad  company, which may also
have used the pit for refuse disposal. In 1956,
General Motors Corporation (CMC) leased 3.82
acres  of  the  pit, and  from  1956  to   1960,
disposed of general refuse onsite.  From 1960
to 1974, CMC disposed of an estimated 22.3
million gallons  of  industrial wastes, including
paint  spray booth sludge,  residue  from part
hanger stripping systems, clarifier sludge, and
powerhouse coal  ash.   In  1974,  the   State
required closure of the disposal area along with
ground  water  monitoring.   Onsite elevated
levels of several contaminants, including TCE
and chromium,  were  detected in the ground
water after the site was closed. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses control of the source
area, as well as monitoring of ground water.
Natural attenuation  will  be  relied  upon  to
remediate the  ground water.    The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the  waste,
soil, and/or ground water are VOCs including
benzene,  toluene and xylenes; other organics
including PAHs; and metals including arsenic,
lead, and chromium.
                                             161

-------
The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes consolidating waste and contaminated
soil from  adjacent property into the original
onsite disposal area; removing trees from the
area to provide a regular surface for the cap;
capping the landfill with a solid waste cap to
comply  with State  requirements; installing a
gas venting system in the cap, if necessary, to
release  gas  generated  during   tree  root
decomposition; monitoring of ground water and
private  wells,  and   evaluating  results  to
determine the need for any additional remedial
action; implementing institutional  controls to
limit  land and ground  water use, and  site
access restrictions  including  fencing.   The
estimated  present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,940,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $137,300 per year for 30 years.
Costs associated with the gas venting system
are not included.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Cleanup levels identified for ground  water are
based on  State Preventive Action  Limits and
include   arsenic   5.0 ug/1   and   chromium
5.0 ug/1.    No  cleanup levels  have  been
determined  for soil or onsite  wastes, as these
will be permanently  contained onsite.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls including deed  restrictions, will  be
implemented to limit land and  ground water
use at the site.

KEYWORDS:    Arsenic;  Benzene;  Capping;
Chromium;  Debris:  Direct  Contact; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls;  Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Organics;    Sludge;    Soil;   State
Standards/Regulations;    Toluene;    Venting;
VOCs; Xylenes.
                                              162

-------
                        RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                      REGION 6
                  (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas)
            ARKWOOD, AR
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 28, 1990

The 15-acre Arkwood site is a former wood
treatment   facility   in   Boone  County,
Arkansas.   Land use in the vicinity of the
site  is  primarily  agricultural and  light
industrial.  Approximately 200 residences
are located within one mile of the site, and
35 domestic water supply wells are within
1.5  miles  of  the  site.     In   addition,
numerous springs including  New Cricket
Spring, are found  on, and adjacent to the
site.   The site  is characterized  as karst
terrain formed by the solution of limestone
and  dolomite  by ground  water.  Ground
water  on, or near  the site is  highly
susceptible to  contamination as a result of
underground  cavities,  enlarged  fractures
and conduits which hinder monitoring and
pumping.   From 1962 to 1973, Arkwood
operated  a   PCP  and  creosote  wood
treatment  facility at the site.  Subsequently
from 1973 to  1984,  Mass Merchandisers,
Inc. (MMI) leased the plant and continued
operations until the lease expired, and MMI
removed  all  remaining  inventory  and
materials offsite.   In 1986, the site  owner
dismantled the plant.   State investigations
conducted  during the  1980s  documented
PCP and creosote contamination in surface
water,  soil,    debris,    and   buildings
throughout the site. Contaminated surface
features  at the  site  include  the  wood
treatment    facility,   a   sinkhole    area
contaminated with oily waste, a ditch area,
a wood storage  area, and an ash pile.  In
1987, EPA  ordered  the site owner  to
perform  an  immediate   removal  action,
which included  implementing site  access
including  fencing and sign postings.  This
Record  of Decision   (ROD)  addresses
remediation of  all affected   media,  and
provides the final remedy for the site.  The
primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, sludge,  debris,  ground water and
surface  water  are  organics  including
pentachlorophenol  (PCP),   PAHs,   and
dioxin; and oils.
The  selected  remedial action for this  site
includes  excavating  approximately 21,000
cubic  yards  of  contaminated  soil  and
sludge  from  the  railroad  ditch,  wood
treatment facility, storage  areas  and  ash
pile; pretreating these materials by sieving
and    washing   the   soil;   incinerating
approximately  7,000   cubic   yards   of
pretreated  materials  exceeding   cleanup
levels  onsite; backfilling  washed  coarse
materials pretreated to below cleanup levels
as   well    as   any   residual    ash;
decontaminating  onsite  structures  and
debris,  followed  by   onsite  or  offsite
disposal; covering the  site  with a soil  cap
and  revegetating  the area; onsite pumping
and  treatment  of  3,000  gallons  of oily
sinkhole  liquids and any wastewater from
decontamination  activities  using  filtration
and  granular activated carbon, followed by
onsite  discharge  of treated  liquids, and
incineration of any free phase oil; disposing
of any residuals offsite; implementing  site
access    restrictions   including   fencing;
monitoring  drinking water  and  ground
water;  providing  municipal water lines to
affected residences; monitoring New Cricket
Spring for  a two-year period to measure
the success of natural attenuation. If PCP
levels still exceed  State standards after two
years,   a  treatment   system   will  be
implemented for the spring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
is $10,300,000.    O&M costs  were  not
provided.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Action  levels  for   soil  excavation  and
treatment include PCP  300 mg/kg  (based
on the leachability of PCP from site soil),
carcinogenic PAHs  6.0 mg/kg (W3 excess
cancer  risk), and dioxin 20 ug/kg (ATSDR).
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
provided.
Not
KEYWORDS:    Alternate  Water  Supply;
Capping;   Carbon  Adsorption   (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act-
Debris;  Decontamination;  Dioxin;  Direct
Contact;  Drinking Water  Contaminants;
Excavation;  Ground Water; Ground Water
                                          163

-------
Monitoring;   Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; O&M;  Offsite Disposal; Oils;
Onsite  Containment;  Onsite  Discharge;
Onsite   Disposal;    Onsite    Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; RCRA; Sludge; Soil; Soil
Wa shi ng / Fl u sh i  ng;   State
Standards/Regulations;   Surface   Water;
Surface  Water  Monitoring;  Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology.
       CIMARRON MINING, NM
          First Remedial Action
           September 21, 1990

The 10.6-acre Cimarron Mining site, Lincoln
County, New Mexico, is an inactive milling
facility  used  to  recover  iron  from  ores
transported   to   the   site.     The  land
surrounding the site supports agricultural,
commercial,  and  residential uses.    A
shallow aquifer, which  is not a potential
drinking  water  source,  and  a  deeper
primary drinking water  aquifer lie beneath
the site.   The iron recovery process was
conducted  onsite between the  late  1960s
and 1979.  Although cyanide was not used
in  the  original   iron-recovery   milling
process, operations changed  in 1979, and
cyanide was  used  until  1982  to  recover
precious metals.  The operation  of the mill
resulted in the discharge of  contaminated
liquids   onsite.      The   sources    of
environmental cyanide contamination at the
site  are  the  processed  waste materials,
including  tailings  piles and  cinder  block
trench sediment  piles, the cyanide solution
and tailings spillage areas, and the cyanide
solution  recycling  and  disposal  areas,
including  cinder block  trenches  and an
unlined discharge pit.   The major  sources
of ground water contamination by cyanide
are the  cinder  block  trenches and  the
discharge  pit.  These areas  of prolonged
contact between  cyanide  solution  and
underlying   soil    led   to    cyanide
contamination in the shallow aquifer. Field
investigations  revealed another abandoned
mill, known as Sierra Blanca, operated by
the same  owner  nearby,  which will be
addressed in a second Record of Decision
(ROD). This ROD addresses contaminated
shallow ground  water  at  the  Cimarron
Mining mill area as Operable Unit 1  (OU1).
The   primary  contaminants of  concern
affecting the debris and  ground water are
inorganics including cyanide.
The  selected  remedial  action for this site
includes    pumping   and   discharging
contaminated shallow ground water to an
offsite  publicly  owned  treatment  works
(POTVV); ground water monitoring; removal
and  offsite disposal of  process chemical
drums,    decontaminated   tanks,    and
associated piping;  filling in the discharge
pit and cinder  block trenches with onsite
soil and waste  pile material and covering
with  clean  soil;   plugging  the  onsite
abandoned   water  supply   well;  and
inspecting  and maintaining  the existing
fence.  The estimated  present  worth cost
for this remedial action is $105,000, which
includes  a total estimated O&M  cost  of
$50,825.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The  discharge to  the POTW will  comply
with the pretreatment standard of cyanide
5 mg/1 (CWA). Ultimate cleanup goals for
the shallow aquifer are based  on  Federal
MCLs  and State  action levels including
cyanide   200 ug/1  (State   and   MCL).
Cyanide will be remediated  to a  Hazard
Index (HI) of less than or equal to 1.
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:   Carcinogenic  Compounds:
Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact;
Filling;  Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;  Ground  Water  Treatment;
Inorganics; MCLs; O&M; Offsite Discharge;
Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Publicly
Owned  Treatment  Works (POTW);  Safe
Drinking    Water    Act;   State
Standards/Regulations;   Water   Quality
Criteria.
       CRYSTAL CHEMICAL, TX
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 27, 1990

The  24-acre Crystal Chemical  site consists
of   a    7-acre   abandoned    herbicide
manufacturing  facility  (referred  to as the
onsite  area) and  18   acres  of  affected
surrounding properties  (referred  to as the
offsite  area)  in Houston, Harris  County,
Texas.   The site lies within the 100-year
floodplain  of  an  adjacent  flood control
channel,  and is underlain  by a shallow
aquifer system.  Surrounding land use is
                                          164

-------
commercial/industrial. From 1968 to 1981,
herbicides, including  arsenide compounds
were manufactured at the site. During that
time several structures,  four evaporation
ponds,  and  many   storage  tanks  were
utilized.    Drums  of raw  and  finished
product were routinely stored in the open.
Onsite soil was contaminated by herbicides
spilled from drums during transfer of raw
materials from rail cars.  Contamination of
offsite  soil and  sediment was a result of
periodic    flooding,   which    caused
contaminated   onsite  materials  to   be
relocated  offsite.  In  1981,  the  site was
abandoned,  and   approximately  99,000
gallons of chemical liquids  in  a storage
tank and 600,000 gallons of wastewater in
the evaporation  ponds  were left  onsite.
Emergency  Removal  Actions conducted
intermittently from 1981  to 1988, included
removing chemical liquids and wastewater,
temporarily capping the site, dismantling
and   decontaminating    structures,
constructing  drains  and   fencing,  and
placing fill material  onsite.  The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil,
sediment,  and ground water is arsenic.

The selected remedial action  for this  site
includes  excavating  approximately 55,000
cubic  yards of  offsite soil  and sediment
with arsenic levels greater  than  30 mg/kg
and redepositing  the   materials  onsite;
treating approximately 16,500 cubic yards of
onsite  soil and sediment  with levels  of
arsenic  greater  than 300 mg/kg  using
in-situ  vitrification; covering the onsite area
with  a  multi-layer  cap;  pumping  and
treating approximately 3 million  gallons of
contaminated ground  water  using  ferric
hydroxide    precipitation,    flocculation,
clarification, filtration, and  ion  exchange;
discharging the  treated  water offsite to  a
publicly owned  treatment works (POTW),
to surface water, or reinjecting the treated
water onsite; disposing of residual sludge
at an  offsite facility; conducting  long-term
ground    water   monitoring;   and
implementing    institutional   controls
including   land   use  restrictions.    The
estimated   present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial  action  is  $18,590,740,  which
includes an annual O&M cost of $140,079
for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The excavation level of arsenic is 30 mg/kg
for offsite soil and sediment and  is based
on calculated health  standards.  Treatment
of onsite soil with greater than 300 mg/kg
arsenic  will  effectively treat  95% of the
onsite contamination  and will reduce the
amount of leachable  arsenic to 5 mg/kg.
The cleanup  standard  for ground  water is
arsenic 0.05 mg/kg, which is based on the
Federal  MCL.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Land use
restrictions will be implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:       Arsenic;    Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds; Clean Air Act;
Clean Water  Act; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water    Contaminants;   Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground  Water
Monitoring;  Ground  Water  Treatment;
Institutional  Controls;  Landfill   Closure;
Leachability  Tests;  MCLs; Metals;  O&M;
Offsite Discharge;  Offsite  Disposal; Onsite
Containment;  Onsite  Discharge;  Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Publicly Owned
Treatment  Works (POTW);  RCRA; Safe
Drinking   Water  Act;   Sediment;  Soil;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
Vitrification; Water Quality Criteria.
        HARDAGE/CRINER, OK
   First Remedial Action (Amendment)
           November 22, 1989

The   Hardage/Criner   site   is   in   an
agricultural  area  near  Criner,  McClain
County, in central Oklahoma.  The site is
situated in the North Criner Creek drainage
basin,  approximately 0.8  miles from  the
confluence of  North  Criner Creek  and
Criner Creek.   From 1972 to 1980 the  site
was operated under a State permit for the
disposal  of  industrial  wastes  including
paint  sludge and solids, ink  solvents,  tire
manufacturing  wastes,  oils, other solvents,
cyanides, and plating wastes sludge. Waste
disposal  practices  have resulted in  the
contamination of approximately 70 acres of
ground water beneath and adjacent to the
site as well as several acres of surface soil.
The principal  source of contamination is
approximately  278,000  cubic yards   of
sludge, waste drums, highly  contaminated
soil, and waste liquids  contained in three
main  waste (source) areas near the center
                                          165

-------
of the property.  Additional source areas
include scattered mixing ponds, spill areas,
and runoff paths in the vicinity of the main
source areas.   Dense  non-aqueous phase
liquids have pooled beneath the disposal
areas  and  are  a  continuing  source  of
contamination to the ground water.  A 1986
Record   of   Decision  addressed  source
control through incineration, stabilization,
and onsite disposal; however, the remedial
action was  not  implemented  due  to
protracted   litigation.    The  1989  ROD
Amendment provides a comprehensive site
remedy addressing both source control and
ground water remediation and takes into
consideration recently enacted land disposal
restrictions.   The primary contaminants  of
concern  affecting the  soil, debris,  and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE,   TCE   and    other  carcinogenic
compounds; other organics including PCBs
and   pesticides;  and   metals  including
arsenic, chromium, and lead; and oils.

The  selected remedial  action  for the site
includes  source control and ground water
components.  Source  control  remediation
includes  installation of  liquid  extraction
wells to  pump out  free liquids  currently
pooled in the three waste areas and any
liquids released from drums buried in the
mounds, followed by  offsite treatment  of
the removed organic  liquids and  onsite
treatment of aqueous liquids; excavation of
drummed   organic  liquids  for  offsite
destruction;  excavation  and consolidation of
contaminated  soil  adjacent to  the main
source areas with placement in the main
source  areas,   followed   by  temporary
capping; treatment of the  main source areas
using  in-situ  soil  vapor  extraction  with
treatment of air used in  soil extraction by
thermal   destruction;  installation  of   a
permanent  RCRA-compliant   cap   once
remedial activities are complete.  Ground
water components are  designed  to  control
the spread  of ground water plumes and
protect downgradient areas because of the
technical impracticability of restoration  of
the  bedrock  aquifer.     Ground  water
remediation  includes  installation  of an
interceptor  trench  downgradient  of  the
source  areas  to  intercept  and  collect
contaminated ground water migrating into
bedrock  zones,  and  a second  trench  or
equally effective system of extraction wells
to  intercept  and   collect  contaminated
ground  water contaminating the alluvium;
design  and   construction  of  an  onsite
ground  water  treatment  system to  treat
both organic  and  inorganic  contaminants
before discharge of treated water to surface
water.  Contaminants already present in the
alluvium will be allowed to dissipate by
natural  dilution, natural attentuation, and
flushing; however, active restoration will be
implemented if contaminant reduction goals
are not  met.   In  addition,  institutional
controls,  surface   water  controls,  and
multimedia   monitoring    will   be
implemented, and the current provision of
an   alternate  water   supply   will  be
continued.   The estimated present worth
cost of this  remedial action is $62,904,655,
which  includes  an  annual O&M cost  of
$1,300,000.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The goal of the soil vapor extraction is  a
99% reduction of the VOC concentrations
found  at  the  beginning of   treatment.
Beyond reduction of the source, the goal of
this action is to restore the ground water,
especially the  alluvial  aquifer  associated
with North  Criner  Creek, to levels below
MCLs, including chromium  50 ug/1.   If
contaminant concentrations in the alluvium
increase  after  trench  installation  and
pumping, or there is a decline in the  mass
of  contaminants of less than 40%  in  10
years,  active  restoration of  the  alluvium
will be implemented.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls  including  deed  restrictions and
maintenance  of  the  availability  of an
alternate water supply  system will be
implemented  to restrict access to the site
and contaminated ground water.

KEYWORDS:    Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Benzene;    Capping;   Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Chromium;  Clean  Air Act;
Clean Water  Act;   Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation;  Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring;   Ground   Water  Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal   Destruction;
Institutional  Controls;  Landfill  Closure;
Lead;   MCLs;  Metals;  O&M;   Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment;  Oils;  Onsite
Discharge;    Onsite    Disposal;   Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; PCE; Pesticides;
Plume   Management;   RCRA;    ROD
Amendment; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
                                          166

-------
Solvents;   State   Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Collection/Diversion; Surface
Water Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
TCE;   Toxic  Substances   Control   Act;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction;
VOCs.
     JACKSONVILLE MUNICIPAL
            LANDFILL, AR
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 27,  1990

The 80-acre Jacksonville Municipal Landfill
site is an inactive landfill outside the city
limits  of  Jacksonville,  Lonoke   County,
Arkansas,   in    a   floodplain   area.
Neighboring the site are the Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill and the Vertac Chemical
Superfund sites.   From  1960  to  1973,
approximately half the site was  used  to
landfill  unknown types or quantities  of
drummed or  loose  waste.   Before 1969,
waste was openly burned prior to onsite
disposal  in unlined trenches.  During this
period,  trenching  was  used  as  the  sole
disposal  method. EPA holds evidence that
the onsite wastes were  physically  and
chemically similar  to the wastes  at  the
Vertac  Chemical  Superfund site,  and that
the waste may have  originated at Vertac.
Dioxin was found in some  of the 10-50
above-ground  waste  drums  at  the  site.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
the drummed waste, soil, and  loose debris,
and  their offsite  disposal at  the Vertac
facility.    The  primary  contaminants  of
concern  affecting the soil and debris  are
organics   including  pesticides,   such   as
dioxin.

The selected  remedial action  for this site
includes  sampling of soil to determine the
amount  of contaminated  soil and debris
onsite;  excavating, with  offsite  thermal
treatment and disposal  of soil and debris
exceeding 2,3,7,8-TCDD 10 mg/kg at  the
Vertac Chemical  Superfund site; excavating,
disinfecting, and  onsite disposal of debris
removed   from    the    10 mg/kg
TCDD-contaminated  areas; backfilling and
covering  the remaining soil and debris with
clean soil; revegetating excavated  areas at
the site;   monitoring  ground  water;  and
implementing    institutional   controls
including deed, ground water use, and land
use restrictions.    The  estimated  present
worth  cost for  this  remedial  action is
$1,949,940,  which includes an annual O&M
cost of $523,730.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil action levels are based on action levels
established  by  the  Centers for  Disease
Control.  Soil with concentrations exceeding
2,3,7,8-TCDD 10.0 mg/kg will be excavated
and transported offsite for treatment.  Soil
with concentrations exceeding 2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.0 mg/kg but less  than  10.0 mg/kg  will
be covered with one foot of soil.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:     Deed
restrictions will be  implemented to limit
land use and  ground  water use on,  and
downgradient  of the site.

KEYWORDS:   Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Dioxin; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain;  Ground   Water  Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal    Destruction;
Institutional   Controls;   O&M;   Offsite
Disposal;    Offsite   Treatment;   Onsite
Disposal; Organics; Pesticides; RCRA; Soil.
       PAGANO  SALVAGE, NM
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 27, 1990

The 1.4-acre Pagano Salvage site is in Los
Lunas, Valencia County, New  Mexico, and
consists of a family-run salvage business
and  a residence.   During 1983,  salvage
operations at the site  included purchasing
"high  technology"  scrap  material  from
Federal   facilities  such  as  transformers,
drums  containing  waste  fluids,  and
capacitors.  Site  inspections in 1984, 1985,
and  1986 revealed several areas  of soil
contamination in  the yard due  to leaks
from   scrap  materials,   which  released
PCB-contaminated  oil  into  the soil.  These
areas  included two surface burn areas,  a
stained soil area, and a surface pool of oil.
In 1990, EPA removed approximately 5,100
cubic yards (i.e., soil in excess of 10 mg/kg
PCBs based on  TSCA cleanup policy)  of
contaminated soil and debris for disposal in
an approved RCRA facility offsite.  Soil
containing  less  than 10 mg/kg PCB  was
covered with a 10-12 inch  soil cover.  Soil
sampling has confirmed that this removal
has resolved the  PCB contamination at the
site  and  EPA  proposes  no additional
                                          167

-------
remedial action.  Based  on this rationale,
there  are  no  primary  contaminants  of
concern affecting this site.

The selected remedial action for this site is
a no  action  remedy with  ground water
monitoring for  one year at  the request of
the State.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:  Ground Water Monitoring;
No Action Remedy.
            ROGERS  ROAD
        MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, AR
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September  27, 1990

The 10-acre Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
site is an inactive landfill in a residential
and  agricultural  area  in  Pulaski  County,
outside  the  city  limits  of  Jacksonville,
Arkansas. Approximately 50 residences are
located  within one-half  mile of  the site.
Furthermore, the site lies within a 100-year
floodplain and has poor drainage because
of slow  percolation of rainwater.   From
1953 until 1974, approximately one half of
the  site  was  used  intermittently  as  a
municipal waste disposal facility.  Specific
waste types and  quantities  are unknown;
however, wastes  appear  to have  been
disposed of in a long excavated trench and
in  several  surface  piles.    In  addition,
chemical   waste   materials    probably
originating   from   the   nearby   Vertac
Chemical Corporation,  including herbicides
and associated dioxin impurities, have been
disposed of at the site.  Currently, as many
as 50 drums of contaminated materials are
estimated to be onsite, of which 30 drums
are visibly  corroded  with  their contents
exposed.  Investigations by EPA beginning
in  1983  revealed that a  1/2-acre  drum
disposal  area containing drums, waste piles
of other  types of  contaminated debris, and
associated soil contaminated with herbicides
and  dioxin, comprises  the principal threat
from the site.  Vertac Chemical Corporation
wastes   were   also  disposed  of  at  the
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill Superfund
site, which is 1/2 mile east of the site. To
achieve economies of  scale, the two sites
will be remediated concurrently, including
excavating highly contaminated wastes and
soil,  and  transporting  these to Vertac for
final  treatment  and  disposition.    The
primary contaminants  of concern affecting
the soil and debris are organics including
dioxin/furan (2,3,7,8-TCDD), the pesticide
dieldrin, and herbicide compounds (2,4,5-T,
2,4-D, and 2,4,5-TP).

The  selected remedial action  for this site
includes   additional  soil sampling  with
excavation of approximately 50 cubic yards
of highly contaminated soil and debris (i.e.,
greater than 10 ug/kg  of  2,3,7,8-TCDD),
followed by offsite temporary storage of the
material at the Vertac Chemical Corporation
Superfund   site;    conducting   thermal
treatment  of all Rogers Road  site material
stored  at  the  Vertac  site,  followed by
residual  analysis  to  evaluate treatment
effectiveness, backfilling of residuals on the
Vertac  site, and revegetating backfilled ash
areas;  steam cleaning  and  disposing  of
debris  removed from the Rogers Road site
at the Vertac  site;  backfilling excavated
areas  and   the   open   trench   with
uncontaminated    native    soil   and
decontaminated refuse; covering onsite soil,
debris, and  waste  contaminated  at low
levels (i.e., below the cleanup criteria) with
twelve inches of native soil;  inspecting and
maintaining soil caps  and fences; ground
water   monitoring;   and  implementing
institutional  controls   including  ground
water  and  land  use  restrictions.   The
estimated   present   worth  cost  for  this
remedial   action  is   $1,226,000,   which
includes a total O&M cost of $384,000 over
30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Pre-remedial  action  levels  have   been
identified  and  will be used to determine
where   soil    remediation   is   required.
Post-remedial treatment goals  will be used
to assure  that effective treatment has been
achieved.    Moderately-contaminated  soil
and    debris   triggering  action    levels,
including   2,3,7,8-TCDD between  1  and
10 ug/kg (10"5  excess cancer risk), dieldrin
greater than 37.0 ug/kg (10"7 excess  cancer
risk),  and/or  a  dieldrin  and  herbicide
(2,4,5-T and 2,4,5-TP) combination resulting
in  a  cumulative  Hazard  Index  (HI)
                                          168

-------
exceeding 0.7,  will  be covered  with 12
inches of clean soil.  Thermal  treatment
will  be used for approximately  50  cubic
yards of soil and debris with 2,3,7,8-TCDD
exceeding  10 ug/kg.    Treatment  goals
include achieving 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.0 ug/kg
(health-based) or a  99.9999% destruction
removal efficiency (40 CFR 264.343), and
2,4-D   10,000 ug/kg   (40   CFR   268.43),
2,4,5-TP 7,900 ug/kg (40 CFR 268.43), and
dieldrin 37 ug/kg Thealth-based),  as  well
as  a  combined  dieldrin  and  herbicide
cumulative HI  less  than 0.7.  The overall
residual risk  attained by these goals will
be  less than 8 x  10s and  a maximum
cumulative HI of 1.0.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including land use controls will be
implemented  to limit ground water use on,
and immediately downgradient of the site.

KEYWORDS:   Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Debris; Decontamination;  Dioxin;  Direct
Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Ground    Water    Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal    Destruction;
Institutional  Controls;  Landfill  Closure;
Leachability Tests; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite  Treatment;   Onsite   Containment;
Organics; Pesticides; RCRA; Soil; Temporary
Storage; Treatability Studies;  Treatment
Technology.
TENTH STREET DUMP/JUNKYARD, OK
       First Remedial Action - Final
           September 27, 1990

The 3.5-acre Tenth Street  Dump/Junkyard
site is an inactive landfill  in Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma, within the North Canadian
River's 100-year floodplain.  There are two
residences and a salvage  yard within 100
yards of the site.  From 1951  to 1979, the
site was used,  in succession, as a municipal
landfill, a privately owned  and  operated
salvage yard,  and an  automobile salvage
yard.  Waste materials accepted by the first
salvage yard  included  paint thinners, old
transformers,  and tires.   Dielectric fluid
that contained PCBs was drained from old
transformers,  stored  in barrels, and sold.
During   this   PCB   recovery  process,
substantial quantities of PCB-contaminated
oil were spilled onto the ground at the site.
In 1983, EPA  site inspections located 20
drums, some of which were corroded and
leaking contaminated material into the soil.
Soil samples, taken on and around the site,
showed   contamination   by   hazardous
materials, particularly, high levels of PCBs.
In 1985,  EPA completed removal actions,
which   included   disposal   of  drums
containing   hazardous    waste,
decontamination and  relocation  of junk
automobiles, consolidation of contaminated
soil to the center of the site, installation of
a  plastic  liner and  a  clay  cap,  and
installation of security fencing. This Record
of Decision addresses soil contamination at
the site.   It is estimated  that 8,500  cubic
yards of  soil  are contaminated  by PCBs,
with 7,500 cubic yards of this total having
PCBs levels  above the TSCA  PCB spill
cleanup policy level of 25 mg/kg.   The
primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil are organics including PCBs.

The  selected  remedial  action for this  site
includes removing the  red clay cover and
plastic liner; excavating an estimated 7,500
cubic yards of PCB-contaminated soil with
concentrations  of 25 mg/kg  and  higher,
followed by treatment of the excavated  soil
by  chemical  dechlorination  and  carbon
adsorption to control  air  emissions;  and
backfilling and  regrading the  excavated
area with clean and  treated soil.   The
estimated   present  worth  cost for  this
remedial  action is $4,044,000.  There are no
O&M costs associated  with this remedial
action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminated  soil  with   greater  than
300 mg/kg PCB (an order of  magnitude
higher  than  the  health-based  goal)  is
considered the principal threat.  However,
the soil excavation goal is  PCB 25 mg/kg
(TSCA), due to the cost  effectiveness  of
treating soil with low levels of PCBs along
with the  highly contaminated soil, and is
based on a 10* excess cancer  risk  level.
Soil  residuals  will  contain  less  than
2 mg/kg PCBs.
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:  Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Onsite Disposal;
                                         169

-------
Onsite Treatment;  Organics;  PCBs;  Soil;
Toxic Substances Control  Act; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology.
TEXARKANA WOOD PRESERVING, TX
          First Remedial Action
           September 25, 1990

The  25-acre  Texarkana Wood  Preserving
site is a former wood  treating facility in
Bowie County,  Texas,  within  the  Days
Creek 100-year  floodplain.   Surrounding
land  use  is  industrial,  residential,  and
agricultural.  Since the early 1900s, several
lumber-related businesses have  operated at
the site, with documented creosote-based
wood treating operations  starting in 1954.
By 1971, Texarkana was also using creosote
and    pentachlorophenol   for   wood
preserving.  State investigations of the site
between 1968 and 1984  showed Texarkana
to be negligent or delinquent in fulfilling
various permit requirements.   Fund-lead
removal actions from 1986 to 1988 included
implementation of site  access  restrictions,
and  construction of  a berm  around, and
pumping  down the  creosote-contaminated
onsite processing ponds to prevent runoff
and  overflow.   This Record  of Decision
(ROD) addresses onsite contaminated  soil
near    the   processing   ponds   and
contaminated ground water  in a  shallow
aquifer.  Remediation of ground water in a
deeper  aquifer  will  be  addressed  in  a
subsequent   ROD.        The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment,  sludge,  and  ground  water are
organics including dioxin, PAHs, pesticides,
such  as dioxin, and phenols.

The  selected remedial action for this  site
includes excavating  approximately 77,000
cubic yards of  contaminated  soil (includes
any   affected   sediment  and   sludge),
followed   by   onsite   treatment   using
incineration, leachability testing of residual
ash,  and onsite backfilling of ash with the
installation of a soil cover and revegetation;
pumping and treatment of approximately
16 million gallons of contaminated ground
water from  the  shallow aquifer  using
carbon  adsorption,  with  onsite or offsite
regeneration  or offsite disposal of the spent
carbon, pretreatment using ferric hydroxide
precipitation and flocculation, followed by
clarification and filtration  as needed,  and
reinjecting the treated water onsite into the
shallow   aquifer;    and   implementing
institutional    controls,   including   deed
restrictions  to  limit  land  use.    The
estimated  present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial  action   is  $47,500,000,  which
includes a total O&M cost of $1,060,000.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil  remediation will reduce  the  excess
cancer risk to below 10*.  Ground water
will  be restored  to its  beneficial use  as
drinking water. Chemical-specific goals for
soil include  carcinogenic PAHs 3 mg/kg,
total PAHs 2450 mg/kg, dioxin 20 ug/kg,
and    pentachlorophenol   150 mg/kg.
Chemical-specific goals  for  ground water
include   carcinogenic   PAHs   10 ug/1
(detection   limit),    dioxin    0.001 mg/1
(Proposed MCL).  CWA requirements for
PAHs  and  dioxin  in ground  water  are
lower  than the above values, but ground
water   will   be   remediated   to  below
detection limits as indicated.

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:     Deed
restrictions will be implemented to restrict
future site land use.  Water use restrictions
cannot be enforced in Texas,  however.

KEYWORDS:    Air  Monitoring;  Carbon
Adsorption   (GAC);   Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean Closure; Clean Water
Act; Closure  Requirements; Dioxin; Direct
Contact; Excavation;  Floodplain;  Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water  Treatment;   Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;    Institutional   Controls;
Leachability  Tests; MCLs;  O&M;  Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite   Treatment;   Organics;   PAHs;
Pesticides; Phenols;  RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water  Act;   Sediment;  Sludge;   Soil;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
              TINKER APB
     (SOLDIER CREEK/BLDG 3001), OK
          First Remedial Action
             August 16, 1990

The   220-acre   Tinker   AFB   (Soldier
Creek/Building  3001)  site, which  includes
an active military  facility  and the  adjacent
Soldier  Creek  is  in  Oklahoma   City,
Oklahoma.  Surrounding land use  is urban
residential.    Underlying  the  site  is  a
                                          170

-------
surficial perched aquifer and a sole-source
aquifer for the region.  The Building 3001
(B3001)  facility  is used  as  an  aircraft
overhaul and modification complex for jet
engine service, repair, and upgrades. From
the 1940s to the  1970s, organic solvents
were  used  to  degrease  metal  parts in
subsurface   pits.      Ground   water
contamination has  occurred onsite  as a
result of  seepage  from these pits, direct
discharge of solvents to storm drains, spills,
and faulty drainage system connections.  A
North Tank  Area  contains  several active
and abandoned underground waste oil and
fuel tanks. Contamination in this area has
resulted from leaking tanks and  fuel spills
directly onto the ground. In addition, there
is onsite VOC contamination, which may be
the result of leaking utility lines in  the
area.  Investigations by the Air Force from
1982 to  1989 documented  ground water
contamination under the  B3001  complex;
the potential threat of further contamination
from  Pit   Q-51,   one  of  the  former
degreasing  pits;  and  that  underground
storage tanks in the North Tank Area were
leaking.   In 1985  in response  to   the
detection of onsite contamination,  the  Air
Force removed an abandoned 13,000 gallon
gasoline tank from the North Tank Area,
closed three contaminated production wells,
and  cleaned  all  of the onsite degreasing
pits with the exception of Pit Q-51, which
contains   approximately   45  gallons  of
contaminated liquid waste.  This  Record of
Decision (ROD)  addresses  remediation of
onsite ground water, along  with remedial
actions relating to  Pit Q-51 and  the North
Tank  Area.   A  subsequent ROD  will
address  contamination  associated  with
Soldier Creek.  The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil, debris,  and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE,  TCE,  toluene,  and  xylenes; other
organics  including phenols; and metals
including chromium and lead.

The selected remedial  action for this site
includes ground water pumping and onsite
treatment  using air stripping to  remove
VOCs, precipitation to remove metals, and
fine  filtration to remove any  remaining
organics  and metals;  using  the  treated
water  in   onsite  industrial   processes;
disposing  of any  residuals   from   the
treatment processes offsite; recovering 6,000
to 12,000 gallons of hydrocarbons  floating
above the ground water table by  using a
dual fluid production system, followed by
offsite   disposal   of   the   hydrocarbons;
removing approximately  45  gallons of
liquid waste from Pit Q-51, and placing the
liquid waste into  55-gallon  drums; steam
cleaning, backfilling and covering the pit
with a  concrete  slab;  storing the drums
temporarily  onsite; disposing of waste and
wash water  from  the  steam  cleaning
process  offsite; removing and disposing of
a  750-gallon  waste  tank,  and  properly
abandoning,  demolishing  and  backfilling
the onsite 235,000-gallon fuel oil tank at the
North Tank Area; treating the contaminated
soil from the North Tank Area using vapor
extraction, with destruction of vapors in a
thermal   combustor;  and  ground water
monitoring.   The estimated  present worth
cost for  this remedial action  is $13,198308.
O&M costs were not provided.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil  remediation  goals include  a  99%
removal  of  organic  contaminants  at  the
North   Tank  Area.     Chemical-specific
ground   water  cleanup  goals   include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), PCE  5 ug/1 (MCL),
TCE 5  ug/1 (MCL),  chromium  50 ug/1
(MCL), and  lead 50 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:    Air  Stripping;  Benzene;
Carcinogenic   Compounds;   Chromium;
Clean Air  Act; Clean Water Act; Debris;
Direct   Contact;   Drinking   Water
Contaminants;  Ground  Water;  Ground
Water    Monitoring;   Ground    Water
Treatment;   Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Lead;  MCLs;  Metals;  O&M;
Offsite  Disposal;  Onsite  Containment;
Onsite   Discharge;   Onsite   Treatment;
Organics;    PCE;   Phenols;   Plume
Management; RCRA;  Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil;  Sole-Source Aquifer;  Solvents;
State   Standards/Regulations;    TCE;
Temporary  Storage;  Toluene;  Treatment
Technology;  Vacuum Extraction; VOCs;
Xylenes.
                                         171

-------
             VERTAC, AR
          First Remedial Action
           September 27, 1990

The Vertac site,  a former  herbicide and
pesticide   manufacturing    facility   in
Jacksonville, Arkansas, is comprised of an
onsite  and  offsite  area.   Production of
herbicides and pesticides, including "Agent
Orange," began  in  1948 and resulted in
extensive onsite contamination. The offsite
contamination, which  is the  focus of this
Record  of Decision (ROD),  resulted from
improper    discharge    of    wastewater
generated  during onsite operations.  Prior
to  1960,   untreated   wastewater   was
discharged  directly  into Rocky  Branch
Creek, which flows into Bayou Metro a few
miles  south  of the site.  Beginning in the
1960s, wastewater was  discharged  to the
city's  Old Sewage Treatment Plant, which
had been upgraded with a  pretreatment
facility that included an aerated lagoon and
oxidation    ponds    (West    Wastewater
Treatment Plant).   A  solvent  treatment
process  was later added to remove dioxin
from the product.  This process, however,
created contaminated liquid and solid waste
residues that were  drummed and  buried
or stored onsite until 1987, when pesticide
production ceased.  As part of an effort to
improve onsite disposal methods, a cooling
water pond and  equalization basin were
closed,  and  sediment  was  removed  and
placed in an onsite sediment vault in 1986.
The burial area was capped,  a french drain
and   leachate  collection  system   were
installed, and ground water monitoring was
initiated.   Since  1986,  EPA has made
various  improvements to the onsite area
and  ordered the site  owners to  remove
some  offsite soil and install  fencing in the
Rocky Branch floodplain.  Currently, the
State has ordered that  offsite contamination
including   remediation   of   process
wastewater  to   Rocky   Branch   Creek,
discharge of pretreated process wastewater
to city sewer lines, and stormwater runoff
from the Vertac onsite area.  The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil,
sediment,    and    sludge   is
2,3,7,8-tetra-chlordibenzo-p-dioxin.

The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing contaminated sediment
from  the active sewage lines between the
Vertac  plant  and  the  West Wastewater
Treatment Plant, with onsite incineration of
sediment, followed by onsite disposal  of
residual  ash;  grouting  abandoned  sewer
lines; removing sludge from the sludge
digester  at  the  Old  Sewage  Treatment
Plant;  incinerating  the   sludge  onsite,
followed by onsite disposal of residual ash;
capping the sludge drying beds with clean
soil and  demolishing treatment units after
removing and treating the  accumulated
water at the Old Sewage Treatment Plant,
followed by  onsite  discharge  of treated
water to  Rocky Branch Creek; draining and
capping  the  aeration basin  at  the  West
Wastewater Treatment Plant; removing soil
and sediment with TCE levels greater than
1 ug/kg from Rocky  Branch Creek and
Bayou Metro  floodplains;  incinerating  the
contaminated  soil  and sediment onsite,
followed by onsite disposal of residual ash;
continuing to enforce a commercial fishing
ban  and a sport  fishing  advisory.   The
estimated present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial  action  is  $14,000,000,  which
includes  an  annual O&M  cost of $57,000
for year  one and $46,000 for years 2-30.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The  Agency   for  Toxic  Substances  and
Disease  Registry  has  recommended  a
soil/sediment  action level for  TCDD  of
1 ug/kg for  the offsite area, which will
result in the reduction  of carcinogenic risk
from as  high as 10"3  due to the sewer line
sediment to  10"5 or 10"6, depending on  the
point of  exposure.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Deed and
land use restrictions will  be  implemented
at the West  Wastewater  Treatment  Plant
and  the  Old  Sewage Treatment Plant  to
maintain the commercial/industrial zoning.

KEYWORDS:      Capping;  Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean Closure;  Clean Water
Act;  Dioxin;   Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain;    Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;  Institutional  Controls;  O&M;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment;   Organics;  RCRA;   Sediment;
Sludge; Soil; Treatment Technology.
                                          172

-------
                        RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                     REGION 7
                           (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska)
           FAIRFIELD COAL
        GASIFICATION PLANT, IA
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 21,  1990

The  1.3-acre  Fairfield  Coal Gasification
Plant is a former coal  gas generator plant
in the town of Fairfield, Jefferson County,
Iowa. Since 1917, the site  has been owned
by the local power company.  From 1878 to
1950, gas was generated from  coal as an
energy source using various processes, each
producing an array of by-products  that
were either sold or disposed  of  onsite.
Since 1937, coal tar  and ammonium liquor
wastes were disposed  of onsite.  In 1986,
site investigations by the power company
found evidence  of  surface  contamination
and   contamination  in  the   underlying
ground  water  as a result of leaching from
buried  coal tar wastes.  The  source  of
contamination  was  determined  to be  the
sediment and  soil associated with  a relief
gas holder, a gas holder pit area, and a tar
separator.  The  primary contaminants  of
concern affecting the soil, sediment,  and
ground  water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene,  and  xylenes;  other  organics
including PAHs;  and  metals   including
arsenic,  chromium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action for the site
includes excavating  3,800 cubic yards  of
PAH-contaminated coal tar waste, soil, and
sediment from the   source areas and  an
additional undetermined quantity  of soil
from these site areas after separating and
decontaminating larger items, followed by
offsite   treatment   using   incineration;
pumping and  treatment of an  estimated
1,577,000 gallons of  contaminated  ground
water using filtration,  polymer injection,
and  settling  out of the  sludge  wastes,
followed by treatment of  the supernatant
using   carbon  adsorption   with   offsite
discharge to a publicly owned  treatment
works (POTW) or onsite use of  the treated
water in a nutrient  addition   treatment
process; disposing of the settled sludge in
accordance   with   approved    disposal
methods; treating the  coal gas migration
areas by enhanced bioremediation if a pilot
study proves successful; and implementing
institutional  controls,  including  ground
water and land use restrictions, and site
access  restrictions, such  as  fencing.  The
estimated  present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial   action  is   $5,815,000,  which
includes  an  estimated   O&M  cost   of
$4,762,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will be treated to reduce the
level of contaminants to levels acceptable to
the State,  including benzene  1  ug/1  (10*
cancer   risk  level),  toluene  2,000 ug/1
(lifetime health  advisory),  and  xylenes
10,000 ug/1  (lifetime  health   advisory).
Ground  water   will be  treated to  best
available detection levels.  If the ground
water   remediation  levels  can  not  be
attained, alternate concentration levels may
be established or a chemical-specific ARAR
waiver  may be invoked in  an amended
ROD. Cleanup levels for soil are based on
risk  assessment and include  total PAHs
500 ug/kg, carcinogenic PAHs 100 ug/kg,
and benzene 241 ug/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Ground
water and land  use  restrictions will be
implemented to prevent direct contact with
contaminants.

KEYWORDS:       Arsenic;    Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application; Carbon
Adsorption    (GAC);   Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Chromium; Clean Air  Act;
Decontamination;   Direct    Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring;  Ground   Water   Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal    Destruction;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment;   Onsite   Discharge;   Onsite
Treatment;    Organics;   PAHs;    Plume
Management; Publicly  Owned Treatment
Works   (POTW);  RCRA;  Sediment; Soil;
State    Standards/Regulations;    Toluene;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Xylenes.
                                         173

-------
     HASTINGS GROUNDWATER
        CONTAMINATION, NE
       (EAST INDUSTRIAL PARK)
          First Remedial Action
           September 28, 1990

The Hastings Groundwater Contamination
site is a contaminated aquifer in and near
the  city  of Hastings,  Adams  County,
Nebraska. The site consists of seven source
areas,  or   subsites,  contaminated   with
industrial  chemicals.    This  Record  of
Decision   (ROD)  addresses  contaminated
surface soil (1-10 feet)  on approximately 14
acres  of  the  2,600-acre  Hastings  East
Industrial  Park subsite.  The subsite is on
a  portion of the former Hastings  Naval
Ammunition Depot (NAD).  Investigations
have  detected  three  major  types  of
contaminants  in  onsite  soil,   including
explosives such  as trinitrotoluene (TNT),
carcinogenic    and    noncarcinogenic
polynuclear  aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
and  metals.  The  remedy  is designed to
control the migration of contaminants from
surface soil to the underlying aquifer. One
or more future RODs for this subsite will
address contaminated ground water,  and
possibly  vadose zone remediation.    The
primary contaminants of concern  affecting
the  soil   are  organics  including PAHs;
metals including arsenic,  chromium,  and
lead; and  TNT.

The selected remedial action for this subsite
includes    excavating   and    treating
approximately  125,900   cubic  yards  of
contaminated  soil.    Treatment  of  the
excavated soil includes  onsite incineration
of an estimated  16,400 cubic yards of soil
containing  high   levels    of   organic
contaminants    (e.g.,    TNT   exceeding
660 mg/kg, PAHs  exceeding  1.8 mg/kg)
with  final  residue disposition  based  on
residual   analysis    results;   stabilizing
approximately   39,000  cubic  yards  of
metal-contaminated soil followed by placing
the soil  in an  onsite  RCRA Subtitle  C
hazardous waste landfill; and  stabilizing
approximately 70,500  cubic yards of soil
with low levels of organic and explosive
contamination (less than 104 excess  cancer
risk), if effective, and placing the stabilized
soil in the  constructed  onsite landfill.   If
stabilizing   the   low-level
organic-contaminated soil is ineffective, the
soil will  be placed  directly in the landfill.
If  soil is RCRA  characteristic  hazardous
waste, it  will be treated to the appropriate
RCRA   best  demonstrated   available
technology treatment standard or to the soil
and   debris  variance  levels  prior  to
placement in the  landfill.  The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
is $45,000,000, which includes an estimated
annual O&M cost of $86,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil  with concentrations  exceeding TNT
660 mg/kg   or   PAHs   1.8  mg/kg
(carcinogenic risk  exceeding  104)  will be
remediated by incineration. Cleanup goals
for the  surface soil contaminants  include
TNT  2.5 mg/kg  (based on  carcinogenic
risk),  total  PAHs  50 ug/kg  (based  on
analytical   detection   limits),   arsenic
11 mg/kg (background  levels),  chromium
230 mg/kg (noncarcinogenic hazards), and
lead 69 mg/kg  (noncarcinogenic hazards).
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:  Arsenic; Background Levels;
Carcinogenic   Compounds;   Chromium;
Direct   Contact;    Excavation;
Incineration/Thermal   Destruction;  Lead;
Metals;    O&M;    Organics;    Onsite
Containment;   Onsite   Disposal;  Onsite
Treatment;  PAHs;   RCRA;  Soil;   Soil
Washing;  Solidification/Stabilization;  State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology.
     HASTINGS GROUNDWATER
        CONTAMINATION, NE
            (FAR-MAR-CO)
         Second Remedial Action
           September 28, 1990

The Hastings Groundwater Contamination
site  (FAR-MAR-CO)  is  a   contaminated
aquifer  in and near the city of Hastings,
Adams County, Nebraska. The site consists
of   seven   source   areas,   or   subsites,
contaminated   with   volatile   industrial
chemicals.  This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses  the   Zone  2  portion  of  the
FAR-MAR-CO  subsite,  which  has been
divided   into   two   general   areas   of
contamination referred  to as Zone 1 and
Zone 2.  Zone 1, which includes grain
elevators  and areas to  the  north  of  the
                                          174

-------
elevators, contains soil, soil-gas, and ground
water   contaminated   with    ethylene
dibromide   and   carbon   tetrachloride
originating from the  disposal  of  liquid
grain fumigants  used  in  grain elevator
operations.   Zone 1 contamination  was
addressed in a 1988 ROD that documented
the selection of a remedy to construct a soil
vapor extraction system.  Zone 2,  which
includes  the  area  south  of  the  grain
elevators  (between   the   elevators  and
manufacturing  and  production  buildings
owned  and  operated  by  the   Hastings
Irrigation Pipe Company (HIPCO)) contains
soil   contamination   primarily   due   to
1,1,1-trichloroethane  (TCA)  resulting from
the disposal of cleaning solvents used  in
the manufacturing operations.  In  December
1989, HIPCO performed a  removal action
excavating  contaminated soil in Zone  2.
Subsequent  testing   revealed   that  the
concentration of TCA in Zone 2  had been
reduced to a protective  level.   Response
actions  for  ground  water contamination
near the FAR-MAR-CO subsite,  however,
will be addressed  in subsequent remedial
activities.

The selected remedial action for this site is
that no further action be taken at this time
with regard to the TCA soil contamination.
Due  to  the  small  amount   of residual
contamination remaining in the soil and the
significant depth to  the water  table, the
possibility of transport of TCA  from this
source  to   ground   water   is  minimal.
Ground water monitoring will continue on
a semi-annual basis for two years.  HIPCO
will conduct the ground water monitoring
and has agreed to reimburse the EPA for
all oversight costs.  There are  no additional
costs associated with this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:  Ground Water Monitoring;
No Action Remedy.
   LINDSAY MANUFACTURING, NE
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 28, 1990

The 42-acre  Lindsay Manufacturing site is
an   irrigation   sprinkler  manufacturing
facility in Lindsay, Platte County, Nebraska.
The site is in a topographic low created by
Shell  Creek, a USDA-designated wetland.
Part  of the  site  is also within a 100-year
floodplain, and a sand and gravel aquifer
underlies the site. Sprinkler manufacturing
operations began in 1958, and until 1982,
10,000 to 15,000 gallons of spent acid from
a galvanizing process was piped monthly
to an earthen unlined disposal pit.  After
1982,  a wastewater treatment facility was
used.    In  addition,  small quantities  of
solvents and degreasers were burned in
two burn areas,  or disposed of at the rear
of the facility in  a disposal pit.  Test wells
for the 1982 treatment facility construction
showed  acid  contamination  of  ground
water.  In  1984, Lindsay and  the State
performed  interim  remedial  measures to
extract  and  treat  ground  water  using
precipitation and flocculation technologies.
Investigations from  1987-1989 revealed  soil
and   ground  water  contamination  by
organics and metals  throughout the site.
This ROD addresses both the remediation
of soil source areas and the enhancement of
the   ground  water   treatment  already
underway as a result of the interim action.
The   primary contaminants   of  concern
affecting the soil and ground  water  are
VOCs, including  PCE; and metals including
chromium and lead.

The selected remedial action  for the  site
includes  vacuum extraction  of  volatile
organic compounds from soil, followed by
a  carbon adsorption  filter system  before
vapor   emission,   with    full-scale
implementation based on the  results of a
pilot study; onsite pumping and treatment
of ground  water using  precipitation and
flocculation,  followed by sedimentation of
the flocculant,  with  onsite  discharge  to
surface water, and disposing of dewatered
solid  residuals  offsite at a local  landfill.
The estimated present worth cost  for this
remedial  action  is  $3,006,600,   which
includes an  annual  O&M cost of $636,000
for 5  years.
                                         175

-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup  levels  are  based on  the more
stringent of either SDWA MCLs  or State
regulations.    These  levels  will  reduce
lifetime cancer risks to between 104 and 10*
for   carcinogenic  compounds,  and  the
Hazard Index  (HI)  to less  than  1  for
non-carcinogens. Chemical-specific ground
water  cleanup  goals include  PCE 5 ug/1
(proposed  MCL),  chromium  0.05 mg/1
(MCL), and lead 0.05 mg/1 (MCL). Specific
cleanup levels for soil were not  provided.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:    Ground
water use restrictions will  be implemented
to prohibit drinking water well construction
within the contaminant plume.

KEYWORDS:  Carbon Adsorption  (GAC);
Carcinogenic   Compounds;  Chromium;
Clean   Water   Act;   Direct    Contact;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring;  Ground  Water   Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite  Discharge;
Onsite  Treatment;  PCE;  RCRA;  Safe
Drinking    Water   Act;   Soil;   State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum  Extraction;
VOCs; Wetlands.
    MIDWEST MANUFACTURING/
           NORTH FARM, IA
      First Remedial Action -  Final
           September 27, 1990

The 8-acre Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm site is located on a manufacturing site
owned and operated by Smith-Jones, Inc. in
Kellog,  Iowa.   Land  use in  the  area is
primarily  industrial.   From 1973 to 1981,
Smith-Jones engaged in electroplating and
painting  operations   of   manufactured
products, which involved the use of TCE to
clean the product before it was coated with
the metal.  In  1977,  the  State required
treatment  of the wastewaters to precipitate
metals.  The solid residuals were stored in
an  above-ground  tank,  then  transferred
periodically to an  unlined  disposal  cell
onsite.  Site inspections in the early 1980s,
by  EPA  revealed elevated  heavy metal
concentrations in the 170 cubic yard waste
disposal cell, the surrounding soil,  as well
as a 7,200 cubic foot waste metals pile and
a borrow pit area.  Ground water sampling
revealed  contamination  of  the  alluvial
aquifer underlying  the  site.   This  ROD
addresses both source control and ground
water remediation at the site.  The primary
contaminants  of concern  affecting  the
soil/waste and ground  water are VOCs,
including PCE, TCE, toluene,  and xylenes;
and metals, including chromium and lead.

The selected  remedial action  for  this site
includes installing a low permeability cap
over the waste disposal  cell in accordance
with RCRA  landfill closure requirements;
treating ground water using air stripping,
and possible treatment of vapor/air mixture
using carbon adsorption, and filtering water
to   remove   inorganics,    if   needed;
discharging the treated water  onsite to the
Skunk River or offsite to a publicly owned
treatment  works (POTW); implementing
institutional  controls including deed  and
ground water use restrictions; and ground
water  monitoring   for  30 years.    The
estimated  capital cost  for this  remedial
action is  $288,419,  which includes a total
O&M cost of $200,425 for 25 to 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water contamination at the site will
be reduced to meet  Iowa Anti-Degradation
Requirements.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Deed and
ground  water  use  restrictions   will  be
implemented    until   remediation    is
completed.

KEYWORDS:    Air  Stripping;   Arsenic;
Capping;   Carbon   Adsorption   (GAC);
Carcinogenic  Compounds;   Chromium;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water  Treatment;   Institutional  Controls;
Landfill Closure; Leachability Tests;  Lead;
MCLGs;  MCLs;  Metals;   O&M;   Offsite
Discharge;   Onsite  Containment;   Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW); RCRA;
Safe  Drinking  Water  Act;  Soil;  State
Standards/Regulations;   TCE;    Toluene;
VOCs; Xylenes.
                                         176

-------
  MISSOURI ELECTRIC WORKS, MO
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 28, 1990

The   6.4-acre   Missouri  Electric   Works
(MEW) site is an electrical equipment sales,
service,  and remanufacturing operation  in
Cape  Girardeau, Missouri.    Intermittent
onsite  runoff  channels  flow  into  Cape
LaCroix Creek located 0.7 miles east of the
site, which enters the Mississippi River, 1.1
miles  to the southeast.  A wetland area is
located  700  feet south of the site.   Since
1953, MEW has recycled materials from old
electrical equipment, including the reuse of
filtered transformer oil.   More than 16,000
transformers   have   been    repaired   or
scrapped, and approximately 28,000 gallons
of transformer  oil received  onsite were
never recycled.   The MEW  property,  as
well   as  adjacent  properties, have been
contaminated with  PCBs as  the result  of
inadequate  storage  and   handling   of
transformers   and   PCB-contaminated
transformer  oils.   In  addition, spills and
disposal   of  industrial   spent  solvents
occurred  onsite  affecting  ground  water
underlying the site.  In  1984, preliminary
State and EPA investigations found leaking
drums of  transformer oil onsite and  PCB
levels in  soil  of  up  to  21,000 mg/kg.
Based on  this,  in 1984,  the State required
removal of approximately 5,000 gallons  of
drummed  waste  oil.    EPA  conducted
investigations  from 1985  to  1987  that
revealed onsite PCB contamination  in the
soil  at  levels  of  up  to  58,000 mg/kg.
Offsite migration of PCBs also was detected
during these investigations.   In 1988, the
EPA required MEW to notify the public  of
site  contamination,  limit   exposure   to
employees and the public, and minimize
movement of PCB-contaminated soil offsite
from runoff  and erosion. In 1989, barriers
were  installed  across runoff  channels  to
intercept contaminated runoff.  This Record
of  Decision   (ROD)   addresses   both
contaminated soil and sediment removal,  as
well  as  the  treatment of affected  ground
water.   The  primary   contaminants  of
concern  affecting the soil,  sediment, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE,  and  TCE;  and organics  including
PCBs.
The  selected  remedial action for this  site
includes excavating PCB-contaminated  soil
and   sediment  and   treating   these  by
incineration onsite; placing  exhaust gases
through  flue-gas coolers and  particulate
removal  systems;  removing  acid  gases
in-situ; backfilling with residual materials,
based   on   leachability   test   results;
constructing  a soil  cover over  the site;
pumping and treatment of  ground  water
with  filtration  and   treatment  via  air
stripping    with   subsequent   carbon
adsorption; discharging the  treated  water
offsite to a surface drainage  ditch between
the site and the wetlands or to a publicly
owned  treatment  works (POTW).   The
estimated   present  worth cost  for  this
remedial   action  is   $9,130,000,  which
included an estimated annual O&M cost of
$64,010 for 15 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminant  levels for soil  and sediment
after  treatment  will  represent an  excess
upper bound  lifetime cancer risk of 2 x 10"5.
Cleanup  levels for ground  water will be
10"5 and cleanup levels will meet the TSCA
PCB  Spill  Cleanup  Policy, State  water
quality standards  and  Federal MCLs  for
VOCs. Chemical-specific goals include TCE
5 ug/1  (MCL) for  ground  water, PCB
10 mg/kg (TSCA) for soil to a depth of 4
feet, and PCB 100 mg/kg (TSCA) for  soil
below a 4-foot depth.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:     Deed
and/or  land  use  restrictions  will  be
implemented  to limit  the site to industrial
or commercial use.

KEYWORDS:   Air;  Air  Monitoring;  Air
Stripping;  Benzene;  Carbon  Adsorption
(GAC);  Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water  Treatment;  Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;   Institutional    Controls;
Leachability Tests; MCLGs;  MCLs; O&M;
Offsite Discharge;  Onsite  Disposal;  Onsite
Treatment;  Organics;  PCBs;  PCE;  Public
Exposure;  Publicly  Owned  Treatment
Works (POTW); Safe  Drinking Water Act-
Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE;   Toxic   Substances   Control   Act;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Wetlands.
                                         177

-------
      NORTHWESTERN STATES
       PORTLAND CEMENT, IA
      First Remedial Action -  Final
             June  26, 1990

The Northwestern States Portland Cement
site, a cement manufacturing facility, is in
Mason City,  Cerro  Gordo County, Iowa.
Calmus    Creek   flows   between   the
Northwestern   States  Portland  Cement
Company (NWSPCC) facility and another
cement manufacturing plant facility located
just north of  the site.  The site includes a
150-acre  area  named  the  West  Quarry
where NWSPCC disposed of 2  million tons
of waste cement  kiln  dust from 1969 to
1985.   Local ground  water and  surface
water have been impacted by elevated pH
levels as a result of  waste cement kiln dust
disposal in the West Quarry.   Two seeps
emerged  from the northeastern portion of
the West  Quarry in  1979  with high pH
water from the seeps flowing overland into
Calmus  Creek.   In  1984,  the  State found
elevated  pH   levels   in   Calmus  Creek
downstream of the  seep area,  and  in 1985
ordered NWSPCC to cease discharge from
the seep area  to Calmus Creek and to cease
kiln dust disposal in the quarry.  In 1987,
NWSPCC installed  an  acid-neutralization
system to  treat the  seep water  and  to
dewater the West Quarry pond, the open
area    of   the   quarry   filled   with
approximately 420 million gallons of water.
This  action has significantly decreased the
contact of the water  with the kiln dust and,
as a  result, pH levels in the quarry water
have  declined.   This Record  of Decision
(ROD) addresses the contamination source,
the cement kiln dust  disposed of  in the
West  Quarry,  and  the resulting  ground
water and surface   water contamination.
The  primary  contaminants  of  concern
affecting  the  ground  water and  surface
water  are organics   including  phenols;
metals including chromium and lead; and
other inorganics including  waste  cement
kiln dust.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this site
includes  continued  acid neutralization of
the water from the dewatered West Quarry,
followed by  discharge of  the  neutralized
water to Calmus  Creek; construction of a
permanent   drainage   system   in  the
dewatered    West   Quarry   to   collect
precipitation  runoff  and  ground  water
inflow to the West  Quarry, followed by
onsite  treatment  of contaminated  water
prior  to discharge of the treated  water to
Calmus  Creek;   installation  of  bedrock
dewatering wells to collect contaminated
ground water beneath the West Quarry, to
prevent  migration  of  the  contaminated
ground  water  from  the   site,  and  to
maintain ground  water  levels  below  the
kiln   dust;   installation  of   kiln   dust
dewatering wells, if necessary, to facilitate
kiln dust dewatering; capping of the West
Quarry area containing cement kiln dust;
pumping and  treatment  of ground  water;
and  monitoring  of ground  water  and
treated discharge.   The estimated present
worth  cost  for   this  remedial  action  is
$2,037,129,  with  estimated  O&M costs  of
$210,000  for  year  one  and $65,000  for
subsequent years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Discharges to Calmus Creek will meet State
effluent limitations including pH 6.0 to 9.0
and  phenols  0.05 mg/1.  Treated ground
water will meet State ground water action
levels   and   SDWA   MCLs,   including
chromium 0.05 mg/1 (MCL), lead 0.05 mg/1
(MCL), and pH 6.5 to 8.5 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:     Capping;   Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Direct Contact; Chromium;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Inorganics; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite  Containment;
Onsite   Discharge;   Onsite   Treatment;
Organics; Phenols; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standard/Regulations; Surface Water;
Treatment Technology.
     SHENANDOAH STABLES, MO
     Second Remedial Action - Final
           September 28, 1990

The Shenandoah Stables (SS) site is located
in a  rural area near Moscow Mills, Lincoln
County,   Missouri,   within   the   upper
floodplain of Crooked Creek.  The property
includes  an  enclosed  arena   and  horse
stables building, a number of single family
residences, a livestock operation, and other
small businesses on  approximately  5-  to
10-acre land parcels around the facility.  In
                                          178

-------
1971, the area inside the arena was sprayed
with  approximately   1,500   gallons   of
dioxin-contaminated  waste  oil  for dust
control purposes. Subsequently, a number
of adverse effects were noted in horses,
other  animals,  and in  humans.   In  two
separate  removals during 1971 and 1972,
approximately  24 to  26  inches  of  the
contaminated materials were removed and
disposed of either offsite or onsite.  EPA
investigations    in    1982    identified
contamination  at  the  facility  by  dioxin
levels  greater   than   1,750 ug/kg,  with
approximately  8,600 yd2 of  interior  and
exterior site areas affected.  A 1988 Record
of  Decision   (ROD)   documented   the
remedial action, which involved excavating
and   interim   onsite   storage    of
dioxin-contaminated soil  exceeding Federal
and State health-based  levels.   This ROD
addresses the final remedy for the site, the
removal   of   3,471   cubic   yards   of
contaminated  materials  currently  stored
onsite in  2,660 separate containers.   The
primary  contaminant of concern  affecting
the soil  and debris is dioxin.

The selected  remedial  action for this  site
includes  transporting of  3,471  cubic yards
of  contaminated  materials offsite to  the
Times  Beach Superfund site for thermal
treatment,  followed by  land  disposal  of
treatment residuals offsite; and restoring the
Shenandoah Stables site by decontaminating
and  dismantling  the   onsite   storage
buildings.  The  estimated total cost for this
remedial action is $2,800,000. There are no
O&M costs associated  with this  remedial
action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Thermal  treatment  will  ensure 99.9999%
destruction and removal of dioxin from the
contaminated soil and debris.
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:   Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Clean Air  Act; Clean  Water Act; Debris;
Decontamination; Dioxin; Direct  Contact;
Floodplain;    Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;   Offsite  Disposal;   Offsite
Treatment;  Organics;  RCRA; Soil;  State
Standards/Regulations;   Treatment
Technology.
      WAVERLY GROUNDWATER
        CONTAMINATION, NE
      First Remedial Action - Final
           September 26, 1990

The Waverly Groundwater Contamination
site  is  in  Waverly,  Lancaster  County,
Nebraska.  At this municipally owned site,
the ground water aquifer provides 100% of
the drinking water for  the community of
approximately 2,000 people  through  the
municipal water system. Between 1952 and
1974,  a Federal grain facility, located on a
portion  of  the  site,  was the source  of
ground water contamination.  From 1955 to
1965, the fumigant 80/20, composed of 80%
carbon  tetrachloride   and   20%  carbon
disulfide, was used onsite on stored grain.
Chloroform  is a  by-product  of  carbon
tetrachloride production and may also have
been present onsite. In 1982, contamination
was detected in Public Water Supply Well
(PWS) Numbers  1  and 3.   PWS 3  was
removed from service and four additional
wells were installed outside the known area
of contamination.   In  1988,  EPA  began
contaminant  treatment  at   the  site   by
installing  an  air  stripping  system,  in
conjunction  with  ground water pumping
and  treatment and soil vapor  extraction
systems.    The contaminants of concern
affecting the soil  and  ground water  are
VOCs including carbon tetrachloride and
chloroform.

The selected  remedial  action for this  site
includes   continued    operation    and
maintenance  of  the   ground  water  air
stripping  system  and  the  soil  vapor
extraction system; ground water monitoring
to delineate the  magnitude and extent of
contamination;    evaluation   of    the
construction  of  PWS   3  to  explain  the
contamination  in  this  well;  sampling
existing  and  new   monitoring   wells;
development of a ground water flow and
transport model to determine the correct
pumping rate for the existing ground water
extraction  well,  and investigation of  the
potential  uses  for  the  treated  water
discharged offsite.  The estimated  present
worth cost  for   this  remedial  action  is
$3,550,000, which includes an  annual O&M
cost of $451,000 for 15 years.
                                         179

-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil gas cleanup levels for VOCs will be
reduced to the performance criteria level of
6.5 ug/kg calculated  for  the  site.   Soil
levels were  below the calculated cleanup
levels of  1.1 mg/kg  and 1.7 mg/kg for
carbon   tetrachloride  and  chloroform,
respectively.  The treated  water discharge
will  meet State NPDES  permit  levels  of
5.0 ug/1  for  carbon  tetrachloride  and
3.8 mg/1 for chloroform.   Ground  water
cleanup  levels will  meet  State   MCLs
including  carbon  tetrachloride  5.0 ug/1
(MCL)  and  chloroform  below  3.8 ug/1
(MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean  Water  Act;  Direct
Contact;  Drinking  Water  Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment;  MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Pesticides;  Plume  Management; Publicly
Owned  Treatment Works  (POTW);  Safe
Drinking  Water  Act;  Soil;  Sole-Source
Aquifer;    State    Permit;   State
Standards/Regulations;   Treatment
Technology;  Vacuum  Extraction;  VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria.
     WELDON SPRING QUARRY/
      PLANT/PITS (USDOE), MO
        Second Remedial Action
           September 28, 1990

The   226-acre    Weldon   Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE) site is a former
ordnance works  and  chemical plant  near
the city of Weldon Spring in St. Charles
County, Missouri.  The site is divided into
two   noncontiguous  areas:  a  217-acre
chemical plant area, comprised of various
buildings, ponds  and  four raffinate  pits,
and a 9-acre quarry, which forms a valley
wall at the edge  of  the  Missouri  River
floodplain.  Since the  early 1940s, the site
has been  used  by  various  government
agencies   for  chemical   and  ordnance
processing  with  chemical  and radioactive
waste disposal in the quarry. From 1941 to
1946, the site was an Army ordnance works
used for the  production of trinitrotoluene
(TNT) and dinitrotoluene (DNT) explosives,
and the quarry was used to dispose of the
chemical wastes.  From 1955 to 1966 the
Atomic  Energy  Commission (AEC),  the
predecessor to the Department of Energy,
constructed  and  operated  the  chemical
plant for processing uranium and thorium.
Types   of  wastes  disposed   of  onsite
included uranium and thorium ore residues
(drummed and uncontained), radioactively
contaminated building  debris, processing
equipment, and residues of TNT and DNT
from  cleanup  of  the  former  ordnance
works.      Except   for    partially
decontaminating buildings and dismantling
some equipment, the site has not been used
since  1967.    In 1990, EPA  released  a
remedial investigation/feasibility study and
proposed  plan,  which  documented five
remedial actions for the quarry.  The first
remedial   action   involves   treating
contaminated surface water, followed  by
discharge of treated water  to the Missouri
River.  The second remedial  action, which
is documented in this Record of Decision
(ROD), addresses interim deposition of bulk
wastes in the quarry  to minimize future
ground water and air contamination and to
facilitate  additional characterization  of
waste and residuals in and around  the
quarry.   Final  decisions  for disposal  of
wastes will be made in a subsequent ROD
for  the  chemical  plant.   Future remedial
actions will address materials remaining in
the  quarry walls  and floor, ground water
contamination, and contaminated properties
outside   the  quarry.      The  primary
contaminants  of  concern  affecting  the
quarry soil, sludge, and debris are organics
including  PCBs  and   PAHs;  radioactive
materials; and metals including arsenic and
lead.

The selected  interim remedial  action for
this site includes excavating an estimated
95,000   cubic  yards of  chemically  and
radioactively  contaminated  bulk  wastes
from the  quarry  and  temporarily  storing
the  wastes onsite in  the  chemical plant
area;   and   implementing   site  access
restrictions.   The estimated  total cost for
this remedial action is  $11,000,000.   There
are  no  O&M costs associated with this
remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not provided.
                                         180

-------
INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS:   Arsenic;   Carcinogenic
Compounds;   Debris;   Direct   Contact;
Excavation;  Floodplain;  Interim  Remedy;
Lead;  Metals;  Organics;   PAHs;  PCBs;
Radioactive  Materials; Sludge; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Temporary Storage;
Toxic Substances Control Act.
 WHEELING DISPOSAL SERVICE, MO
       First Remedial Action - Final
           September 27, 1990

The 200-acre Wheeling Disposal Service site
is  an  inactive  industrial  and  sanitary
landfill in Amazonia,  Missouri.    Onsite
disposal features include nine solid waste
trenches,  five  liquid  waste trenches, two
evaporation  ponds, a farm chemical area,
three tannery  waste  areas, and a rinsed-
container area.   Surrounding  land  use is
mixed residential and agricultural.   From
1964 until the landfill was closed in 1986,
municipal and industrial wastes, including
tanning   sludge,    pesticides,   asbestos,
laboratory wastes, construction debris, paint
sludge, battery  and  cyanide  waste,  and
crushed  drums  were disposed of  in  the
various onsite disposal units.  EPA and the
State    conducted   onsite   and   offsite
investigations  from  1980  to  1987  that
identified   the   presence   of   onsite
contamination  with no  evidence of offsite
contaminant  migration.   The  remedial
investigation/feasibility  study conducted in
1989  and 1990 confirmed  these  results.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
both  source control and  management  of
contaminant  migration, and  is  a final
remedy.  The   primary contaminants  of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, ground
water,  and  surface  water  are  VOCs
including TCE and  toluene; other organics
including pesticides; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and  lead.

The selected remedial action for  this site
includes upgrading the existing landfill cap
with  a revegetated  clay  and  soil  cover;
monitoring  onsite  ground   and  surface
water;  abandoning  onsite   wells;  and
implementing    institutional    controls
including deed  restrictions, and site access
restrictions such as fencing. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
is $1,205,800, which  includes  an annual
O&M cost of $42,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Performance criteria for ground water and
surface water will be developed,  and may
be  based on  Federal  MCLs or  Ambient
Water   Quality  Criteria,  or State  water
quality standards.   If contaminant  levels
exceed   these  criteria,   ground   water
treatment and/or leachate  collection and
treatment may be required.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:     Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
agricultural use of the disposal area.

KEYWORDS:       Arsenic;    Capping;
Carcinogenic    Compounds;   Chromium;
Clean Water  Act; Direct Contact;  Drinking
Water   Contaminants;   Ground  Water;
Ground  Water   Monitoring; Institutional
Controls;  Landfill Closure; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Disposal;   Organics;   Pesticides;  Plume
Management;  RCRA;  Safe Drinking Water
Act;   Sediment;    Soil;   State
Standards/Regulations;   Surface   Water;
Surface Water Monitoring; TCE;  Toluene;
VOCs;  Water Quality Criteria.
           WHITE FARM EQUIPMENT DUMP, IA
                 First Remedial Action - Final
                     September 28, 1990

          The 20-acre White Farm Equipment Dump
          site  is  an active  landfill  near  the  north
          border  of Charles City in  Floyd  County,
          Iowa.   The  site lies within the 100-year
          floodplain of the Cedar River in the former
          location of a sand and gravel quarry, and
          borders farmlands to the west, north and
          east with residential areas to the south of
          the site.  Drainage from the site toward the
          northwest and  south  feeds  into adjacent
          wetland areas.  The Charles City municipal
          wells,  located  700 feet  east  of  the site,
          obtain water from the deep, confined Cedar
          Valley aquifer.  Additionally, six  shallow
          drinking water  wells  that draw from  an
          uncontrolled  water  table  are 1,000 feet
          downgradient from the site. Intermittently
          since 1971,  approximately 650,000  cubic
          yards  of wet  scrubber   sludge, foundry
          sands, baghouse dusts, and other industrial
                                          181

-------
wastes were disposed of onsite.  In 1984, to
assess  the environmental impact of this
disposal, the State required the  installation
of four  ground  water  monitoring wells.
Site assessments in 1985 and 1986 revealed
ground   water   contamination    and
documented that elevated metal  levels were
present in the  shallow  alluvial aquifer  in
close  proximity  to the  municipal  wells.
The  primary   contaminants  of  concern
affecting the soil, debris, and ground water
are VOCs including benzene and toluene;
and  metals  including arsenic,  chromium,
and lead.

The  selected remedial action for this site
includes regrading and covering the landfill
with an impermeable  layer of topsoil and
vegetation  to   prevent   contaminant
infiltration, leaching, run-off, and erosion;
ground water  pumping and  treatment by
air stripping followed by onsite discharge
of treated water; controlling  air emissions
by carbon adsorption  with offsite disposal
of residuals; monitoring  metal contaminant
levels and adding a metals treatment train
as needed; ground  water monitoring; and
implementing  site access restrictions and
institutional   controls,   including   deed
restrictions.  The estimated present worth
cost  for this remedial action  is $2,352,121,
which  includes an annual O&M cost  of
$89,345 for years 1-5 and $35,865  for years
6-30.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The  concentration of benzene  in ground
water  will  be  reduced  and  maintained
below  1 ug/1 (State standard).

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:     Well
installation  and  property  use  will   be
limited by deed restrictions.

KEYWORDS:     Air  Stripping;  Arsenic;
Benzene;  Capping;  Carbon   Adsorption
(GAC);  Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Water Act;  Debris; Direct
Contact; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water   Monitoring;    Ground    Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure;  Lead;  Metals;  O&M;  Onsite
Containment;   Offsite   Disposal;   Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Sludge;
Soil;   State  Permit;   State
Standards/Regulations;   Toluene;  VOCs;
Wetlands.
                                          182

-------
                            RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 8
               (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming)
            EAST HELENA, MT
            First Remedial Action
             November 22, 1989

The 80-acre East Helena site,  in East Helena,
Lewis  and  Clark  County,  Montana,  is  a
primary lead smelting facility that has been in
operation  since 1888.   In 1927 the Anaconda
Company  constructed a plant adjacent  to the
lead smelter to recover zinc from the smelter's
waste slag.  Asarco, the owner and operator of
the smelter facility, purchased the zinc plant in
1972 and operated the plant until 1982.  Prickly
Pear Creek flows near the site and has been
found to contain elevated levels of arsenic and
lead.  Air  quality and soil investigations also
revealed the presence of contaminated soil in
East Helena  residential  areas,  contaminated
process ponds over shallow ground  water near
the plant,  and elevated  blood-lead levels in
school children.  A 1984 remedial investigation
identified    elevated    levels    of    metal
contamination in soil, livestock, plants,  and
ground and surface waters with the sources of
onsite  contamination  being   primary   and
fugitive emissions  and seepage  from process
ponds and process fluid circuitry. The site has
been  segregated  into  five  operable  units,
consisting  of  the process ponds, the ground
water, the surface water, the slag pile, and the
ore storage areas.  This  Record of Decision
(ROD)  addresses  four  process  fluid   ponds
which are used for process water retention and
include the Lower Lake, the speiss granulating
pond and  pit, the acid plant  water treatment
facility, and  the former Thornock  Lake, now
dry.  The primary contaminants  of concern
affecting the soil and  sediment in  the process
ponds are metals including arsenic and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this  site
includes excavating and smelting 55,150  cubic
yards of soil  and/or  sediment from  all four
process  ponds and multi-media  monitoring
after   individual   remedial  activities   are
implemented  at three of  the process  pond
areas.   Process  pond  remediation activites
include replacing the  speiss granulating  pond
with a  tank  and  a  secondary  containment
facility and  replacing the  pit with  a  lined
facility; replacing the settling system at the acid
plant  water  treatment facility with a  closed
circuit  filtration  treatment  system;  in-situ
co-precipitation of the process wastes from the
Lower Lake, replacing  the  Lower Lake with
two steel tanks to contain process wastes, and
constructing  a  lined   pond  for  emergency
containment  of  storm  runoff.   If  pilot-scale
testing of in-situ co-precipitation proves to be
impractical,   a  contingency  plan   will  be
implemented, which  includes  treatment of
Thornock Lake  water  at  an  onsite  water
treatment facility to remove metals, followed by
discharge to a publicly owned treatment works
(POTW).  The estimated present worth ost for
this   remedial   action  is   $9,644,500  which
includes an annual O&M cost of $611,200.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil/sediment will be excavated  to a level that
will   ensure  that leachate   will  not exceed
Federal  drinking  water   standards.    The
prescribed standards for Lower Lake process
waters  include  arsenic  0.02 mg/1,  which  is
lower than EPA's MCL  of 0.05 mg/1, and lead
0.05 mg/1,  EPA's MCL.   The State  water
quality  standards  for  arsenic and lead were
waived   on   the    basis   of    technical
impracticability.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:      ARAR   Waiver;   Arsenic;
Carcinogenic  Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water  Act;   Contingency   Remedy;  Direct
Contact;  Excavation; teachability Tests;  Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal;  Onsite Treatment; Publicly Owned
Treatment   Works  (POTW);   RCRA;   Safe
Drinking  Water Act;  Sediment;  Soil;  State
Standards/Regulations;  Surface Water; Surface
Water   Treatment;    Treatability   Studies;
Treatment Technology.
      MARTIN MARIETTA, DENVER
             AEROSPACE, CO
            First Remedial Action
             September 24, 1990

The   5,200-acre  Martin   Marietta,   Denver
Aerospace site is in Waterton, Jefferson County,
Colorado.  The site completely surrounds 464
acres  of  contaminated  Air Force  property,
                                             183

-------
which  is  being  addressed  as  a  separate
Superfund site.  Since 1950, the Martin Marietta
Aeronautics  Group   (MMAG)   has   been
conducting high technology engineering, design,
development, and manufacturing operations for
the space industry onsite.   Types  of  wastes
generated during onsite activities  include oils,
metals, organic solvents, wastewater, chemical
process sludge, and VOCs.  From 1959 to 1980,
untreated,  highly concentrated  waste  from
onsite activities was disposed of in five onsite
ponds, referred to as the  Inactive Site Ponds
Area. An estimated 2,100 cubic  yards of waste
and 24,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil are
contained in  the  Inactive  Site Ponds  Area.
From  1957   to   1969,  solid   wastes  and
construction debris generated at the site were
disposed of in an 11-acre landfill known as the
Rifle Range Landfill.  In addition, waste was
stored in underground storage tanks in an area
referred  to  as the Chemical  Storgage  Area.
Previous site  remediations by MMAG from
1969 to  1985 did not address  contaminant
sources  or migration, but included backfilling
and  regrading of the  Rifle  Range Landfill;
consolidation of  soil and  wastes  from two
onsite  disposal  ponds  into  one pond  and
covering of the ponds with soil; and operation
of a  ground  water recovery  system.    EPA
investigations have identified the  Inactive Site
Ponds  and the Chemical Storage areas,  both
located to the north of the main facility, as the
two  major sources of onsite  soil  and ground
water contamination.  This  Record of Decision
(ROD)   addresses   remediation   of  onsite
contaminated  soil, waste/debris,  and ground
water.   The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil, debris, and ground water are
VOCs  including  TCE;  toluene, and xylenes;
other organics including PCBs,  pesticides, and
phenols; and metals including  chromium and
lead.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this site has
been  divided  into three  separate  areas:  the
Inactive Site Ponds Area, the Chemical Storage
Area, and the  ground water in  the  south
central portion of the site.   Remediation of the
Inactive  Site  Ponds Area includes dewatering
1.3 million gallons of water from perched water
zones; excavating and incinerating off site 2,100
cubic yards of organic waste/soil material from
in and  around  the ponds; thermally treating
onsite    24,000   cubic    yards    of
organic-contaminated   soil;   solidifying  and
stabilizing remaining soil  contaminated  with
inorganics; backfilling excavated areas with the
treated soil, and covering the ponds area with
a RCRA-multilayer  cap.   Remediation of the
Chemical  Storage   Area  includes   treating
VOC-contaminated soil using in-situ soil vapor
extraction, incinerating, and disposing of offsite
any  residual organic-laden sludge from the
thermal extraction  treatment  system  at the
ponds area along with any spent carbon from
the  in-situ   soil  vapor  extraction   process.
Contaminated  ground   water   remediation
includes onsite  pumping and treatment using
air stripping, carbon adsorption,  ion exchange,
UV photolysis/oxidation,  chemical reduction,
and precipitation, followed by onsite discharge
to surface water; and ground water monitoring.
The present worth cost for this remedial action
is $58,240,000, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $1,231,500 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR   GOALS:
Both onsite  and offsite ground water  will be
treated  to  meet SDWA  MCLs  or   MCLGs.
Chemical-specific   ground   water   cleanup
standards  include  benzene 5  ug/1   (MCL),
arsenic  50 ug/1  (MCL),  chromium  50 ug/1
(MCL), lead  5  ug/1 (MCL), and TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL).  Chemical-specific  soil cleanup levels
are based  on  soil  action  levels and TCLP
treatment    standards    including    toluene
28 mg/kg (TCLP), PCB 1.0 mg/kg (TCLP), and
TCE 0.09 mg/kg (TCLP).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not provided.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Chromium; Debris;  Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water;  Ground  Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Treatment; Landfill Closure;  Lead;   MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals;  O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Pesticides;
Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization;    State
Standards/Regulations;   TCE;    Temporary
Storage;   Toluene;  Treatment   Technology;
Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Xylenes.
 MONTICELLO MILL TAILINGS (DOE), UT
            First Remedial Action
               August 22, 1990

 The 300-acre Monticello Mill Tailings site  is
 comprised  of a 78-acre inactive uranium and
 vanadium   milling  operation   and  affected
                                             184

-------
peripheral  properties in Monticello, San Juan
County, Utah.  Surrounding land use is rural
residential and agricultural.  The site overlies a
shallow alluvial aquifer, and part of  the  site
lies within the floodplain of Montezuma Creek.
Approximately 18-acres of wetlands adjacent to
Montezuma Creek also have been contaminated
by tailings.  In 1940, the site was operated as
a vanadium ore-buying station.  Milling of ore
began  in  1942,  and  a  vanadium/uranium
sludge product was produced onsite from 1943
to 1944.   Onsite uranium   milling processes
began  in the mid-forties  and continued until
1959.  Mill tailings from these operations were
disposed of in four onsite tailings piles that are
within the floodplain of the Montezuma Creek.
The mill was permanently closed in 1960, and
the tailings  piles  were covered and  vegetated.
From  1964 to  1965, the  entire  plant  was
dismantled  and  foundations  were  partially
buried onsite along with contaminated material.
Onsite and offsite  soil contamination is  the
result of wind and surface water erosion of the
contaminated  tailings piles  with  subsequent
deposition  elsewhere.   In 1972, 15,000  cubic
yards of contaminated soil were excavated and
disposed of on the  onsite tailings  piles.   Site
investigations from  1989 to 1990 identified  the
presence   of    onsite    and    offsite
radioactively-contaminated  soil  and  ground
water,  and  elevated  concentrations  of metals
within  the  tailings  piles.   This  Record  of
Decision (ROD) addresses remediation of two
Operable Units (OUs): the 78-acre Millsite area
(OU1),  and  the   240-acres  of  peripheral
properties  (OU2).   A  subsequent ROD will
address  remediation  of  ground water  and
surface water once the source areas have been
removed.  The primary contaminants of concern
affecting  the   soil   and  debris  are  metals
including  arsenic, chromium,  and  lead; and
radioactive materials including radium-266 and
radon.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this  site
includes dewatering and excavating 1.5 million
cubic yards of tailings, contaminated soil, and
process-related material from the contaminated
tailings piles; consolidating  these materials in
an onsite repository that will be built one mile
south  of   the   existing   millsite;  diverting
Montezuma Creek to allow for the relocation of
mill tailings and  contaminated floodplain soil,
excavating 300,000 cubic yards of contaminated
soil from the peripheral properties, followed by
eventual consolidation of the soil  within  the
repository;   backfilling  excavated areas with
clean  fill;   treating   surface   runoff  and
construction/dewatering water collected during
construction using evaporation ponds, reverse
osmosis, or another technology and discharging
the  treated   water   to  Montezuma  Creek;
disposing of any treatment residuals within the
repository or at an offsite facility; covering the
repository with  a clay and  multi-media cap;
revegetating  the  millsite  and repository site;
monitoring  air,   ground  water  and surface
water; and implementing  institutional controls
and  site  access  restrictions.   The estimated
capital cost for this remedial action ranges from
$64,787,500 to $70,600,000  (based on the cost of
engineering controls), which includes an annual
O&M cost of $40,846 for 24 years.

PERFORMANCE   STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Federal standards for radium-226 are 5 pCi/g
above background in the surface 15  centimeters
of soil, and  15 pCi/g above  background  level
for radium-226 in the deeper  15 cm  thick layer.
Because  the  background  level  at  the  site is
radium-226  1.0 - 0.4 pCi/g,  excavation  levels
were set  at  6 pCi/g   for surficial  soil, and
16 pCi/g  for  soil greater than 15  centimeters
deep.  The Federal standard  of 20 pCi/m2/sec
for radon emissions  will also be met.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:    Institutional
controls will be implemented at the site.

KEYWORDS:      Air   Monitoring;  Arsenic;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;  Chromium;
Clean  Air   Act;   Debris;  Direct  Contact;
Excavation;    Floodplain;    Ground   Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals;
Mining Wastes; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment;   Onsite    Disposal;    Onsite
Treatment; Radioactive Materials;  Soil;  State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface    Water
Collection/Diversion; Surface Water Monitoring;
Water Quality Criteria;  Wetlands.
 MYSTERY BRIDGE AT HIGHWAY 20, WY
            First Remedial Action
             September  24, 1990

The Mystery Bridge at Highway 20 site is an
industrial  area  with  two  onsite  residential
subdivisions, in Natrona  County, one mile east
of Evansville, Wyoming.   A portion of the site
lies within the 100- and 500-year flood plains of
the North Platte  River   and  Elkhorn  Creek.
Two  plants  are   located  at   the  site:  the
DOW/DSI facility, an oil and  gas  production
                                              185

-------
enhancement service facility; and the KN plant,
which   is  a   natural   gas   fractionation,
compression,   cleaning,    odorizing    and
transmission  plant.    The   site   overlies  a
contaminated  alluvial   aquifer,  which   was
previously used as a source  of potable water.
Probable  sources  of  onsite  ground  water
contamination  include  contaminant releases
from a  DOW/DSI truck wash water system,
which is comprised of an oil/water separator,
a vitreous tile drain, and a leach sump system;
and an onsite toluene storage area.  In 1965, an
underground pipe  burst,  releasing  5,000  to
10,000 gallons  of absorption  oil from the KN
facility into the soil. From  1965 to 1987, a flare
pit was used by KN to collect spent materials
and wastes, and an onsite  catchment area was
used to collect the contaminated surface runoff
and steam condensate from a dehydration unit.
From  1965 to 1987, several small contaminant
releases  occurred   near  the  flare  pit  and
catchment area.   In 1987, site investigations
revealed the presence of aromatic hydrocarbons
in the soil in this area.  Additionally, ground
water sampling revealed the  presence of two
contaminated ground water plumes originating
from the Dow/DSI the  BETX  plume and KN
(VHO plume) facilities, respectively.  The BETX
plume   consists  of aromatic  hydrocarbons
including toluene, and xylenes, while the VHO
plume consists of volatile halogenated organics
and chlorinated organics.  From 1988 to  1989,
both DOW/DSI  and KN  conducted removal
actions,  which   included   remediation   of
approximately 440 cubic yards of contaminated
onsite soil using vapor extraction;  excavation
and  landfilling  of  contaminated   soil   and
removal of the separator, a waste oil tank, and
part of the vitreous tile drain at the Dow/DSI
facility; and ground water treatment at the KN
plant.    This  Record  of  Decision (ROD)
addresses remediation  of  the onsite ground
water emanating from  the Dow/DSI and KN
facilities;  the  VHO   and   BETX  plumes,
respectively. Further cleanup of the remaining
source areas will be addressed in a  subsequent
ROD.  The  primary contaminants  of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene,  and  xylenes.

The  selected  remedial  action for  this  site
includes pumping and  treatment  of ground
water  in  the  VHO plume  followed by  air
stripping  of  ground   water  in   the  more
contaminated upgradient portion of the plume,
and  natural  attenuation  in  downgradient
portions of the plume; pumping and treatment
of ground water in  the BETX plume using air
stripping; reinjecting the treated ground water
from  both plumes into  the  onsite  alluvial
aquifer; ground water and air monitoring; and
implementing  institutional  controls including
deed and  ground water use restrictions.  The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action  is $601,739, which  includes an  annual
O&M cost of $122,914 for 6 years at the VHO
plume,  and  $50,564 for 1  year  at  the BETX
plume.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals
are based  on Safe Water Drinking Act MCLs
and  include benzene  5 ug/1 (MCL),  toluene
2000 ug/1   (proposed  MCL),  and  xylenes
10,000  ug/1 (proposed MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Ground water
use and deed  restrictions  will be temporarily
implemented at the  site.

KEYWORDS:  Air Monitoring;  Air Stripping;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act;  Direct Contact; Drinking
Water   Contaminants;    Floodplain;
Ground Water;  Ground   Water  Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
MCLs;  O&M;  Oils; Onsite Discharge;  Onsite
Treatment;  PCE; Plume Management;  RCRA;
Safe    Drinking   Water    Act;   State
Standards/Regulations; TCE;  Toluene;  VOCs;
Water  Quality Criteria; Xylenes.
      OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT, UT
           First Remedial Action
             September 27, 1990

The 1,100-acre Ogden Defense Depot  site is an
active military facility in Ogden, Weber County,
Utah.  Land  use in the surrounding area is
mixed  residential and  commercial.   The  site
overlies a  shallow  unconsolidated  lacustrine
and alluvial aquifer, which is a potential source
of drinking water.  In the past, both liquid and
solid wastes have been disposed of at the site.
Oily liquid materials and combustible solvents
were burned  in onsite pits, and  solid  materials
were  buried   onsite.   In  fact,  six  different
contaminated   disposal  areas   have  been
identified and divided into four Operable Units
(OUs) for remediation.  This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses OU2, which is comprised of
a  french  drain area, a  building  used  for
pesticide storage (B51), and a parade ground
                                             186

-------
area.  From the early 1970s to 1985, the 8.5 by
20-foot french drain area, which is comprised
of a 2.5 to 4-foot deep gravel-filled excavation,
was used as a loading and mixing area  for
pesticides and herbicides, and for rinsing the
empty containers.   Rinsate  from this  activity
was allowed to  percolate through  the french
drain directly into the ground.   The onsite
storage  building was used  to mix and  store
pesticides, herbicides, and paint,  although no
contamination resulting from B51 activities has
been detected to date.  In addition, two onsite
oil  and solvent burning  pits were  previously
utilized on or near the onsite parade  ground
area.   Site  investigations in 1979, 1981,  and
from  1985  to 1986, determined that improper
waste disposal practices were used at the  site,
and discovered ground water contaminated by
VOCs and pesticides near the french drain area.
Subsequent  investigations from 1988 to  1990,
further   characterized   the   ground   water
contamination, and also  identified  onsite soil
contamination, including high pesticide levels
in the french drain area.  This ROD addresses
soil at the french drain area and onsite  ground
water contamination.   Subsequent RODs  will
address  the  remaining three OUs  and  will
involve continued  investigations and  possible
remediation of other onsite  areas  and media,
including buried wastes, a mustard gas  storage
area, and the oil burning pit area.  The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground  water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE,  and TCE; and other organics including
pesticides and herbicides.

The selected  remedial action for  this  site
includes excavating  approximately  40 cubic
yards of pesticide-contaminated soil from the
french  drain  area,   followed   by  off site
incineration and disposal at a hazardous waste
treatment facility; backfilling  the excavated area
with  clean  soil and  revegetating the  area;
pumping and treatment of approximately
28 million  gallons  of contaminated   ground
water using air stripping and  liquid phase
carbon  adsorption, if  contaminants are  not
adequately  removed   in  the  air  stripping
process;  reinjecting   or  infiltrating   treated
ground   water  onsite;  and  ground   water
monitoring.  The estimated present worth  cost
for this  remedial  action  is $676,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of  $75,000 to
$103,000 for five years.
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
The excavation level for soil has been set at the
lowest consistently detected concentration level
including   pesticides/herbicides
(chlordane/bromacil) 1 mg/kg.  Ground water
cleanup goals are Federal MCLs and  include
TCE  5 ug/1 (MCL)  and  chlordane  2 ug/1
(MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not provided.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping;  Benzene;  Carbon
Adsorption  (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean  Air  Act; Closure  Requirements; Direct
Contact;    Drinking    Water   Contaminants;
Excavation;  Ground  Water;  Ground  Water
Monitoring;   Ground   Water   Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Treatment; MCLs; O&M;
Offsite  Disposal;  Offsite Treatment;  Onsite
Discharge;  Onsite Treatment; Organics;  PCE;
Pesticides;  RCRA; Safe Drinking  Water  Act;
Soil;   State   Standards/Regulations;    TCE;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
           PORTLAND CEMENT
         (KILN DUST #2 & #3), UT
            First Remedial Action
               July 19, 1990

The 71-acre Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 &
#3) site is in a primarily industrial/comrrlercial
area of Salt Lake City, Utah, and consists of 3
separate but adjacent properties known as Site
2, Site  3, and the West Site.  Between 1965 and
1983,  the Portland Cement  Co., which  was
purchased  by Lone Star  Industries in  1979,
deposited approximately 495,000 cubic yards of
waste cement kiln  dust (CKD) on each  of  the
three  properties comprising the site.   Waste
CKD consists primarily of heavy metals and
other   inorganics  and  is   highly  alkaline.
Approximately 360 tons of  chromium-bearing
refractory bricks were disposed of  with  the
waste CKD.  Unlike Sites 2 and 3, the waste
CKD at the West Site is mixed with soil and
debris  including demolition rubble, scrap iron,
concrete  slabs, asphalt, and common and  the!
chromium bearing  refractory kiln bricks.  The
waste CKD has also produced a contaminant
plume  which is present in the shallow ground
water  beneath  the  site  and some adjacent
properties.   This Record of Decision, the first
operable unit, addresses removal of the waste
CKD  and  temporary  onsite  storage  of  the
chromium bricks.  A subsequent  operable unit
will address any  remaining soil  and ground
                                             187

-------
water  contamination   and  treatment  and
disposal of the chromium bricks. The primary
contaminants of concern  affecting  the  waste
CKD are metals including arsenic, chromium,
and lead, and other inorganics.

The selected  interim remedial action for this
site includes excavation  and offsite disposal of
495,000  cubic  yards of  waste  CKD  at  a
noncommercial, industrial  landfill,  which will
be  capped;   removal    of   360   tons   of
chromium-bearing  refractory kiln bricks from
the waste CKD prior to offsite disposal of the
waste CKD,  followed  by  temporary onsite
storage;   ground   water   monitoring;   and
implementation   of   institutional    controls
including   well   construction   and  deed
restrictions.  The estimated present worth cost
for the remedial action is $12,143,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $5,000 for 30
years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Offsite disposal of waste  CKD will eliminate
fugitive  dust emissions  from the site thereby
contributing to compliance with Federal and
State  air quality  standards.   Final soil and
ground water cleanup levels will be addressed
in a subsequent operable unit.

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:    Temporary
deed restrictions will be imposed  prohibiting
site development that could disturb waste CKD
such that  fugitive dust emissions  would  be
generated.  Restrictions will also be imposed to
prohibit the  construction  of  ground  water
drinking wells on or adjacent to the site.

KEYWORDS:      Air;    Arsenic;    Capping;
Carcinogenic  Compounds; Chromium;  Clean
Air Act;  Direct Contact;  Excavation; Ground
Water  Monitoring;  Inorganics;  Institutional
Controls; Interim Remedy;  Lead; Metals; Offsite
Disposal;    O&M;    RCRA;   State
Standards/Regulations; Temporary Storage.
     ROCKY FLATS PLANT (DOE), CO
           First Remedial Action
              January 5, 1990

The 6,550-acre Rocky Hats Plant (DOE) site is
a federal  facility,  which serves as a nuclear
weapons research development and production
complex   in  Jefferson   County,  Colorado.
Surrounding  land   use   is  primarily  rural
residential, although there are some industrial
properties  nearby.     The  site  overlies  an
alluvial/colluvial aquifer, and a small wetlands
area is present within the  facility boundaries.
Since 1951, onsite operations have included the
manufacture of nuclear weapons components
from  plutonium,  uranium,   beryllium,  and
stainless   steel.    There  are twelve   sites,
designated as  solid waste  management units,
which comprise the 881 Hillside area.  In  1987,
EPA  identified  VOC-contaminated  ground
water in the 881  Hillside area located in the
southeast  corner  of  the site  near  a  surface
stream.  Possible sources for this contamination
included chemical  and oil  waste  pits, fuel  oil
tanks, and an  associated drum storage  area,
onsite sol vent/oil spills and leaks, and sanitary
sewer overflow discharge.    This  Record  of
Decision  (ROD)  addresses  management  of
migration  and cleanup of ground  water in the
881 Hillside area,  and is an interim  remedy.
Final remediation of this site will be addressed
in  a   subsequent  ROD.     The   primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs  including   PCE  and  TCE;
metals including  chromium;  and radioactive
materials.

The  selected  remedial  action for  this  site
includes   intercepting  contaminated  ground
water in the alluvial/colluvial aquifer using a
french drain system;  treating the contaminated
water in   an  onsite  treatment  plant  using
filtration followed  by UV peroxide  to remove
organics,   and  ion   exchange  to  remove
inorganics;   storing   the    treated    water
temporarily onsite  during  effluent   quality
testing prior to discharging  the treated  water to
an onsite  interceptor ditch; and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $4,588,200, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $258,100  for
30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Ground water  cleanup standards will be the
more stringent of Federal MCLs or MCLGs, or
State water quality standards. Chemical-specific
goals include PCE 5 ug/1 (State), TCE 5 ug/1
(State),  trivalent chromium 0.05 mg/1 (State),
and chromium  0.05 mg/1 (State).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.

KEYWORDS:     Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Chromium; Direct  Contact;   Ground  Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy;  MCLGs; MCLs;
                                             188

-------
Metals;   O&M;   Onsite  Discharge;   Onsite
Treatment;   PCE;   Plume   Management;
Radioactive  Materials;  RCRA;  Safe  Drinking
Water Act; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Temporary Storage; VOCs; Wetlands.
      ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
         (OPERABLE UNIT 16), CO
          Second Remedial Action
             February 26, 1990

The Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 16) comprises part of the 17,000-acre RMA
site,  which  is a former U.S.  Army chemical
warfare   and   incendiary   munitions
manufacturing and  assembly  plant  in Adams
County, Colorado.  From  the  1950s until  late
1969, the U.S. Army used  the  RMA facility to
produce   the  nerve  agent   GB   (isopropyl
methyl-phosphonofluoridate).   From  1947 to
1982, private industries leased major portions of
the plant  facilities  to  manufacture  various
insecticides and herbicides.  Since 1970, facility
operations   primarily   have  involved   the
destruction  of   chemical   warfare  materials.
Because final remediation of the RMA  site  will
take  many years to complete,  thirteen Interim
Response  Actions  (IRAs)  were  determined
necessary prior to  implementing  the  final
On-Post Record of Decision (ROD).  Operable
Unit 16 (M-l Settling  Basins  area)  is one of
several areas being addressed as part of the
Other Contamination Sources  IRA.  The M-l
Settling Basins area occupies 84,500 square feet
and consists  of three unlined basins  used to
treat waste  fluids from  the  lewisite  facility.
The  basins   also  may  have  received  lesser
amounts of waste materials including mercuric
chloride  from  alleged  spills  within  several
onsite  buildings.    The  basins  have  been
backfilled and are partly covered with soil or
structures.   Site investigations by the Army
revealed  that the waste material in  the basins
is a source of arsenic contamination  in ground
water.      This  ROD   addresses   interim
remediation of  source areas and management
of contaminant  migration.    The   primary
contaminants of  concern   affecting the  soil,
sludge,   and  ground  water  are  organics
including pesticides, and metals  including
arsenic.

The selected  Interim Response Action for  this
interim   remedy  includes   sampling    and
relocating tanks from  the basin  area to an
adjacent area to await a final disposition in the
final On-Post ROD; constructing a  temporary
360-degree subsurface barrier such as a slurry
wall  or  sheet  pilings  around  the  basins;
performing an in-situ vitrification demonstration
test; treating approximately 2,600 cubic yards of
soil and  6,400 cubic yards  of sludge using
in-situ  vitrification  followed   by   carbon
adsorption to  treat  off-gasses; treating  the
recovered  water driven from the sludge during
the vitrification process onsite at the CERCLA
Wastewater Treatment System  or by another
method to  be determined  during remedial
design; and conducting ground water and air
monitoring.  The vitrified soil  will  remain
onsite,  pending  determination  of  a  final
remedial action in the final On-Post ROD.  No
costs were provided for this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
The treatment process will be  constructed to
provide 99.99%  destruction  and removal  of
organics. Treatment standards for effluent from
the offgas control process and other liquids
generated  through dewatering of  the area are
contained   in  the  ROD  for  the  CERCLA
Wastewater Treatment   System  IRA.    Air
emissions  from the  vitrification process will
comply with applicable Clean Air Act emission
standards.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS: Not  applicable.

KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic; Carbon
Adsorption  (GAC); Clean Air  Act;  Ground
Water;  Ground   Water  Monitoring; Interim
Remedy; Metals;  Onsite  Treatment; Organics;
Pesticides;  Sludge;  Slurry Wall;  Soil; State
Standards/Regulations;   Temporary  Storage;
Treatability  Studies;  Treatment  Technology;
Vitrification.
      ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
           (OPERABLE UNIT 17), CO
           Eighth Remedial Action
               May 14, 1990

The Rocky  Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 17) is  a part of the 17,000-acre RMA site,
which is a  former U.S. Army chemical warfare
and  incendiary munitions manufacturing and
assembly plant in Adams  County, Colorado.
From the 1950s until late 1969, the U.S. Army
used the RMA facility  to produce the nerve
agent GB (isopropylmethylphosphonofluoridate).
In addition, between 1947 and  1982,  private
industries  leased  major  portions of the plant
                                             189

-------
facilities  to  manufacture  various  insecticides
and herbicides.  Since 1970, facility operations
have  primarily  involved  the destruction  of
chemical  warfare  materials.   Because  final
remediation  of the RMA  site  will take many
years  to complete, thirteen Interim Response
Actions (IRAs) were determined necessary prior
to implementing the  final remedial  action.
Operable  Unit  17  (CERCLA   Wastewater
Treatment  System)  is  among   those IRAs
specified.   This ROD addresses  the  interim
remedy to develop and  implement a program
to treat  contaminated wastewaters  resulting
from  the  assessment and  implementation  of
response actions at the RMA site.  The primary
contaminants   of    concern  affecting   the
wastewaters are VOCs including benzene, PCE,
toluene, and  TCE;  other  organics including
pesticides;   and  metals   including   arsenic,
chromium, and lead.

The selected Interim Response Action  for this
interim  remedy  includes  constructing   a
centrally located wastewater treatment facility
that will consist of a sequence of unit processes
including    chemical  addition/precipitation,
filtration,  ultraviolet  light/chemical oxidation,
activated carbon adsorption, air stripping, and
an  activated   alumina   treatment   process;
constructing decontamination pads at both the
treatment  facility and satellite non-treatment
wastewater facilities; constructing  five  storage
tanks  with 10,000  to 12,000 gallon capacities;
and  incorporating  offsite discharge  of  the
treated  effluent to  the  sanitary  sewer and
offsite  disposal of treatment facility sludge and
residuals.   No costs were  provided  for this
remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific ARARs, based on  Colorado
Basic Standards for Ground Water (CBSG) and
State MCLs, will be applied to the design of
the treatment  system  and include  arsenic
50 ug/1   (MCL),  benzene  5 ug/1   (MCL),
chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL), lead 50 ug/1 (MCL),
PCE   10 ug/1   (CBSG),   toluene  2,420 ug/1
(CBSG), and TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:  Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon   Adsorption  (GAC);   Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Chromium;   Clean   Water Act;
Decontamination; Interim Remedy; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; Offsite  Discharge; Offsite  Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE; Pesticides;
Safe  Drinking  Water  Act;   Sludge;   State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;    Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
      ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
         (OPERABLE UNIT 18), CO
           Third Remedial Action
             February 26, 1990

The Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 18) site comprises part of the 17,000-acre
RMA  site,  which  is  a  former U.S.  Army
chemical  warfare  and  incendiary  munitions
manufacturing and  assembly plant  in Adams
County, Colorado.  From the  1950s  until late
1969, the U.S. Army used the  RMA facility to
produce the nerve agent GB (isopropyl methyl-
phosphonofluoridate).   In addition,  between
1947 and 1982, private industries leased major
portions of the plant facilities to manufacture
various insecticides and herbicides. Since 1970,
facility operations primarily have involved the
destruction  of   chemical  warfare  materials.
Because final remediation of the RMA site will
take many years to complete,  thirteen Interim
Response Actions  (IRAs) were  determined
necessary prior  to  implementing  the  Final
On-post Record of Decision (ROD).  Operable
Unit  18  (Motor  Pool Area) is  one  of several
areas included   in  the   Other  Contamination
Sources  IRA.   The  U.S. Army acquired the
motor pool area in 1942, and used it for storing
diesel fuel, gasoline, road  oil, and  flammable
liquids in an above-ground storage tank farm.
In addition, during the early 1950s, several
buildings were used for pesticide and herbicide
storage, and  later these  buildings housed an
agricultural  research and bioassay laboratory.
The  Army continues to use the area to service
equipment,  vehicles,  and  railroad cars.   A
diesel  fuel  spill  and other spills  related to
piping  from underground  tanks  have been
recorded.  In 1985, ground water monitoring
identified TCE contamination  near  the motor
pool area and in downgradient water supply
wells.      Records   indicate    that   vehicle
maintenance  operations  involved discharging
water  and  other  liquids,  and  rust  residues
through floor drains and  pipes into  unlined
ditches.     This  ROD   addresses   interim
remediation of source areas and management of
migration.    The  primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil  and ground water are
VOCs, including benzene and  TCE.
                                             190

-------
The selected Interim Response Action for this
interim  remedy  includes conducting a vapor
extraction pilot test; installing and operating an
in-situ vapor extraction system, followed by
granular  activated   carbon   treatment   of
condensed  water vapor with  offsite  thermal
carbon  reactivation;  capping the  site with  a
layer of asphalt to improve the efficiency of the
vapor   extraction   system;   conducting   air
monitoring,   followed  by   possible   stack
treatment by a  vapor phase carbon filter  or
catalytic oxidizer; and ground water pumping,
treatment, and reinjection in conjunction with
the Rail Classification Yard IRA.   No costs
were provided for  this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No chemical-specific goals were identified for
soil contaminants.  Chemical-specific goals for
ground  water treatment, which apply at the
point of injection, are contained in the ROD for
the Rail Classification  Yard  IRA and include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:    Air  Monitoring;   Benzene;
Capping;   Carbon   Adsorption    (GAC);
Carcinogenic  Compounds;  Clean  Air  Act;
Ground  Water;  Ground  Water  Treatment;
Interim   Remedy;  MCLs;  Offsite  Treatment;
Onsite  Discharge;   Onsite  Treatment;  Safe
Drinking Water  Act;  Soil;  TCE;  Treatability
Studies;  Treatment   Technology;   Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs.
      ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
         (OPERABLE UNIT 19), CO
          Fourth Remedial Action
             February 26, 1990

The Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 19)  site comprises part of the 17,000-acre
RMA  site, which  is  a former  U.S. Army
chemical  warfare  and  incendiary  munitions
manufacturing and  assembly  plant  in Adams
County, Colorado.   From the 1950s until late
1969, the U.S. Army used the RMA facility to
produce    the    nerve    agent   GB
(isopropylmethyl-phosphonofluoridate).      In
addition,  between  1947 and  1982,  private
industries leased major portions of the plant
facilities  to  manufacture various insecticides
and herbicides.  Since 1970, facility  operations
primarily  have involved  the destruction  of
chemical  warfare  materials.    Because  final
remediation of the  RMA site will take many
years to complete, thirteen Other Contamination
Sources Interim Response Actions (IRAs) were
determined necessary prior to implementing the
Final  Onpost  Record  of  Decision   (ROD).
Operable Unit 19 (Rail Classification Yard) is
one of the areas included in the  IRAs.  In 1980,
the   pesticide   l,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
(DBCP) was  detected in the alluvial ground
water near the Rail Classification Yard or RMA.
To prevent off-post migration of DBCP in the
ground water, the Irondale  Control System
(ICS) was installed in the Rail Classification
yard in 1981.  This system,  which has been
effective  in  preventing   off-post migration,
involves    pumping   and    treatment    of
contaminated  ground  water  followed  by
reinjection.    Site investigations by  the  U.S.
Army   indicate   DBCP   contamination   in
unsaturated  soil and  sediment,  possibly from
leaking rail cars, to  be  potential sources  of
ground water contamination.     This  ROD
addresses interim management of  migration of
the contaminated ground  water plume.  The
primary contaminant  of concern affecting the
ground water is DBCP.

The  selected  interim  remedial action  for this
site  includes  installing  a  ground  water
interception/containment system parallel to the
contaminant flowpath; increasing the treatment
capacity of the ICS and constructing  pipelines
to convey extracted ground water to the ICS;
ground water pumping and  treatment using
carbon adsorption  at the ICS followed  by
reinjection;   and  conducting  ground  water
monitoring.   This interim remedial action will
be implemented jointly with  the  RMA motor
pool area IRA.  The estimated  present worth
cost   of  this  interim  remedial  action  is
$2,662,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $183,000 for 5 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
The  chemical-specific  goal  for  ground water
treatment of  DBCP is 0.2  ug/1 based  on  the
proposed MCL.   Chemical-specific goals  for
other  potential contaminants  are based  on
MCLs  and   Colorado Basic  Standards  for
Ground Water (CBSG) and include benzene
5 ug/1 (MCL), toluene 2,420 ug/1  (CBSG), and
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS: Not applicable.
                                             191

-------
KEYWORDS:    Carbon  Adsorption  (GAC);
Carcinogenic  Compounds:  Ground  Water;
Ground-Water  Monitoring;   Ground  Water
Treatment;   Interim  Remedy;  MCLs;  O&M;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
Pesticides; Plume Management; Safe  Drinking
Water Act.
      ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
         (OPERABLE UNIT 20), CO
           Fifth Remedial Action
              March 20, 1990

The   17,000-acre  Rocky  Mountain  Arsenal
(Operable Unit 20) site is a former U.S. Army
chemical  warfare  and  incendiary munitions
manufacturing and assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado.  From  the 1950s until late
1969,  the U.S. Army  used  the RMA facility  to
produce   the  nerve  agent  GB  (isopropyl-
methylphosphonofluoridate).   From  1947  to
1982, private industries leased major portions of
the plant  facilities  to  manufacture various
insecticides and herbicides.  Since 1970, facility
operations  primarily   have  involved  the
destruction  of  chemical  warfare  materials.
Because final remediation of the RMA site will
take many years to complete, thirteen Interim
Response  Actions  (IRAs)   were determined
necessary  prior   to  implementing  the  final
On-Post Record of Decision  (ROD).  Operable
Unit 20 (OU20), the Lime Settling Basins area,
is one of several areas being addressed as part
of the Other Contaminated Sources IRA.  The
unlined   Lime    Settling    Basins   occupy
approximately 5 acres, and  were used  in the
1940s  and 1950s to treat chemical production
wastewater  using  a precipitation  process  to
remove  metals and to accept wastewater from
pesticide production.  The wastewater discharge
produced lime sludge contaminated with metals
and pesticides within the basins.  Sludge also
was removed from the basins for drying in  an
adjacent area.  Investigations by the Army  in
1987  and  1989  have characterized the  nature
and   extent of contamination   at the  Lime
Settling   Basins   Area.      The   primary
contaminants of  concern affecting the  soil,
sludge,   and  ground  water   are  organics
including   pesticides; and  metals  including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.

The selected Interim Response Action for this
site includes consolidating 26,000  cubic yards of
contaminated sludge  located adjacent to  the
basins  with  80,000  cubic  yards of  sludge
located in the basins, and containing the sludge
and  any excavated contaminated soil with a
vegetative soil cover;  hydraulically containing
ground  water with a  slurry wall  or  sheet
pilings constructed around the perimeter of the
basin area; pumping ground water to maintain
an inward hydraulic gradient across the slurry
wall; treating ground water onsite, either at the
CERCLA Wastewater Treatment System or at a
separate  onsite treatment facility  to remove
organic   and  inorganic  contaminants;  and
ground water monitoring.  No cost information
was provided for this  interim remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific  ARARs  for ground water
treatment will be contained in the ROD for the
CERCLA Wastewater  Treatment System IRA.
No chemical-specific ARARs were given for soil
or sludge.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.

KEYWORDS:       Arsenic;   Carcinogenic
Compounds;   Chromium;  Clean   Air  Act-
Excavation;  Ground  Water;   Ground  Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Interim
Remedy; Lead;  Metals; Onsite  Containment;
Onsite Disposal;  Onsite Treament;  Organics;
Pesticides; Plume Management; Sludge; Slurry
Wall; Soil; State Standards/Regulations.
      ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
         (OPERABLE UNIT 22), CO
           Sixth Remedial Action
                May 3, 1990

The 17,000-acre Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA)
(Operable Unit 22) site is a former U.S. Army
chemical  warfare  and  incendiary  munitions
manufacturing and  assembly plant  in  Adams
County, Colorado.  From the 1950s to late 1969,
the  U.S.  Army used  the  RMA  facility  to
produce   the    nerve    agent   GB
(isopropylmethylphosphonofluoridate).      In
addition, from 1947 to 1982, private industries
leased major portions of the plant facilities to
manufacture various insecticides and herbicides.
Since 1970, U.S. Army facility  operations have
primarily involved the destruction of chemical
warfare materials. Because final remediation of
the RMA site will take many years to complete,
thirteen  interim response actions  (IRAs) were
determined necessary prior to implementing the
final  On-Post  Record  of  Decision   (ROD).
Operable Unit 22 (OU22), the Complex Disposal
                                             192

-------
Trenches,   is  one  of  several  areas  being
addressed as part of the Other Contaminated
Sources  Interim  Remedial  Action.    These
disposal trenches are located in the  107-acre
Site 36-17N in the center of the RMA.  During
the 1940s and 1950s, this area was the primary
disposal   area  for  solid  chemical  waste,
contaminated  tools and equipment,  rejected
incendiaries,  and  empty  munitions  casings.
This waste  was decontaminated,  placed  in
onsite pits, and burned using fuel oil to ensure
complete   decontamination.      Salvageable
materials such as metal were sold as scrap after
burning,  and nonsalvageable materials  were
buried in onsite pits. Investigations by RMA in
1988 and  1989, identified onsite contaminated
soil and a variety of buried waste, including
scrap metal,  concrete rubble,  wood, charcoal,
drums of  waste chemicals,  and  glass  vials
containing unknown liquids.  Ground water
under  the site  also  was  determined to  be
contaminated.  The main  source area  for the
contaminant  plume, however, appears  to  be
from upgradient trenches located south of Site
36-17N. Ground water contaminant sources are
the subject  of another ROD.   The  selected
interim remedial action is designed  to prevent
taking  measures that may be incompatible with
final decisions.  Therefore,  this ROD will not
address the primary contaminants of concern
affecting   the   soil   and   ground   water.
Remediation  of contaminated media will be a
component of the final site remedy.

The  selected  interim remedial action for this
site is no further action with the installation of
ground   water  wells   for  further   site
characterization; and ground water monitoring.
A reevaluation procedure will identify the need
for any additional onsite remedial actions. No
costs were provided for this interim remedial
action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.

KEYWORDS:    Ground  Water  Monitoring;
Interim Remedy; No Action Remedy.
      ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
         (OPERABLE UNIT 23), CO
          Seventh Remedial Action
                May 3, 1990
The 17,000-acre Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA)
(Operable Unit  23) site is  a former U.S. Army
chemical  warfare  and  incendiary munitions
manufacturing and  assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado.  From the 1950s  to late 1969,
the  U.S.  Army used  the  RMA  facility to
produce   the  nerve  agent  GB  (isopropyl-
methylphosphonofluoridate).    From  1974 to
1982, private industries leased major portions of
the  plant  facilities  to  manufacture various
insecticides and herbicides. Since 1970, the U.S.
Army   facility   operations   primarily   have
involved the destruction of chemical warfare
materials.  Because  final  remediation of the
RMA site will  take  many years to complete,
thirteen Interim Response  Actions  (IRAs) were
determined   to  be   necessary   prior  to
implementing  the  final  On-Post  Record of
Decision (ROD).  Operable Unit 23  (OU23), the
Shell  Section 36 Trenches, is one of several
areas being addressed  as part of the  Other
Contaminated Sources Interim Remedial Action.
Approximately  31  trenches occupy an  8-acre
area of Section 36 in the central portion of the
RMA.   From 1952  to 1965, liquid and  solid
waste  including bulk or  drummed  process
intermediates,   off-specification     product,
laboratory sample filters, and other debris from
the manufacture of pesticides was  disposed of
and buried in the trenches.  Investigations by
the  Army  from  1987 through  1989  have
identified ground  water  contamination  in  a
surficial unconsolidated sand aquifer underlying
the site.  A plume of dense non-aqueous phase
liquids  (DNAPLs)  was  also detected, and is
believed  to have  originated from the  Shell
Section 36 trenches.  The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil and ground water
are  VOCs;  and  other  organics including
pesticides.

The selected Interim Response  Action for this
Operable   Unit  includes   constructing   a
subsurface barrier around  the perimeter  of the
site,  such  as  a grout  curtain  tied  into  an
impermeable  clay  layer  located beneath the
sand aquifer to effectively contain ground water
and DNAPLs; covering the trench  area with a
vegetative  soil  cover to reduce precipitation
infiltration;  and   investigating further  the
DNAPL plume,  which is located downgradient
                                             193

-------
of the trench area.   The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $1,500,000.
O&M costs were not provided.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Not applicable.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not provided.

KEYWORDS:     Carcinogenic  Compounds;
Ground  Water;   Interim  Remedy;  Onsite
Containment;  Organics;   Pesticides;  Plume
Management; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
VOCs.
     SAND CREEK INDUSTRIAL, CO
          Second Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  Sand  Creek  Industrial  site  is chemical
manufacturing  facility  in  Commerce  City,
Adams  County, Colorado.  Land  use in the
area surrounding the site is primarily industrial
and  residential  with  13  residents  onsite.
Production wells  north and downgradient of
the site supply drinking water to the county.
The  Sand  Creek  Industrial  site  lies  in the
vicinity  of  three  other  Superfund   sites:
Woodbury Chemical,   Chemical  Sales,  and
Rocky  Mountain   Arsenal.  Beginning  in the
1960s,   the   Colorado   Organic   Chemical
Company    (COO    conducted    pesticide
manufacturing operations onsite. Disposal and
onsite storage areas include a landfill and acid
pits. Onsite fires in  1968 and  1977, as  well as
improper pesticide storage practices, resulted in
pesticide-contaminated  soil, ground water, and
surface  water.  In 1978, COC  removed  some
contaminated soil, and in  1984, COC removed
drummed wastes, excess  product,  additional
contaminated soil, and  implemented  site access
restrictions including fencing.   The site has
been divided into six Operable Units (OU) to
facilitate  remediation.    A  1989   Record of
Decision (ROD) addressed OU1, which included
remediating some of the subsurface  soil.  This
second ROD  addresses  OU5, and includes the
final response action for the 14,000 cubic yards
of contaminated soil  present onsite at the COC
area.   Subsequent  RODs  will  address the
remaining contamination including the landfill,
acid pits, and ground water.  The primary
contaminants of concern affecting  the soil are
organics  including  pesticides;  and   metals
including arsenic  and chromium.
The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes excavating approximately 14,000 cubic
yards of surface soil above  the health-based
action levels, treating the soil onsite using soil
washing  and  subsequently  backfilling  the
treated soil onsite; grading and revegetating the
site;  incinerating the soil washing wastewater
offsite; and ground  water monitoring.   The
estimated present  worth cost for this selected
remedial action is $4,490,734, which includes an
estimated annual O&M cost of $20,000 for 30
years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Remediation  goals are based on health-based
action  levels  or RCRA  treatabiliry  variance
action  levels,  whichever is more  stringent.
Health-based action levels were established for
soil based  on  a  10* cancer risk and  include
dieldrin    0.155 mg/kg   and   heptachlor
0.553 mg/kg.  Treatability variance action levels
were established for arsenic (90-99% reduction),
chromium   0.5-0.6 mg/1  (TCLP),  chlordane
(90-99% reduction),  2,4-D (90-99% reduction),
and   4,4-DDT  0.5-20 mg/1   (Total   Waste
Analysis).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:       Arsenic;    Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium;) Closure Requirements;
Direct  Contact;  Excavation;  Ground  Water
Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Metals;   O&M;   Offsite  Disposal;    Offsite
Treatment;  Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics;    Pesticides;   RCRA;   Soil;   Soil
Washing/Flushing; State Standards/Regulations;
Treatability Studies;  Treatment Technology.
SHARON STEEL (MIDVALE TAILINGS), UT
            First Remedial Action
             September 24, 1990

The Sharon Steel  (Midvale Tailings) site is  a
former ore milling operation facility in Midvale,
Utah.   Land  use in  the  area  is  residential,
urban, agricultural,  and commercial.   Onsite
and offsite features include a mill  site,  a
tailings  area,   and   an  offsite   residential
community that relies on drinking water supply
wells located within a  three mile radius of the
site.   From 1906  to  1971, the  facility was
operated as a custom  mill, receiving ore from
many sources, then concentrating and extracting
a  variety  of  metals.    Tailings  from these
operations   were   deposited   into  onsite
                                              194

-------
uncovered   tailings  piles,  which  have  an
estimated volume of  14,000,000 cubic yards.
Previous investigations by  the  State  in  1982
identified elevated levels of metals within the
tailings piles.  It is estimated that over 242,000
cubic yards of soil in the residential community
were contaminated by wind-blown tailings from
the  onsite  pile  at  the mill site area.   In
addition, investigations have identified that the
shallow aquifer directly under the mill site also
is contaminated.   This Record  of  Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation  of offsite soil in
the  residential  areas.    A  future ROD will
address contaminant source and ground water
remediation.  The  primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil are metals including
arsenic, cadmium, and lead.

The  selected  remedial  action  for   this  site
includes excavating 242,000  cubic  yards of
contaminated soil with lead levels  greater than
500 mg/kg  and  arsenic  levels greater than
70 mg/kg  to  a  maximum depth of 2  feet,
followed by temporarily disposing of the  soil
onsite  for  future treatment with  the onsite
tailings;  filling  and   revegetating  excavated
areas;   temporarily  relocating  residents  as
necessary; and indoor cleaning if required. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $22,650,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $72,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Soil  contaminated with concentrations greater
then the action  levels  of lead 500 ug/kg and
arsenic   70  mg/kg  will  be  excavated  and
disposed of onsite.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:    A  building
permit must be obtained for future construction
including removal or replacement of pavement
or foundations.   This  requirement will be
imposed to reduce the  level of contaminant
exposure.   A "citizens repository"  may be
created  to provide a  place for residents to
dispose of soil during these future activities.

KEYWORDS:   Arsenic;   Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean  Air Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals;
O&M;  Offsite  Disposal; Onsite Disposal;  Soil;
State   Standards/Regulations;   Temporary
Storage.
         SILVER BOW CREEK, MT
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The  Silver Bow  Creek site  is a  mining and
processing area in the Upper Clark Fork River
Basin,   Deer  Lodge  County,   Southwestern
Montana.   This Record  of  Decision  (ROD)
documents the selected interim remedial action
for one of eleven operable units for the site, the
Warm  Springs  Ponds operable  unit, which
covers  approximately 2,500 acres just above the
beginning of the Clark  Fork River.  Several
onsite  creeks (e.g., Warm Springs, Silver Bow,
Mill, Willow) and a stream bypass (Mill-Willow
Bypass) serve as principal headwaters to Clark
Fork River.   Three settling ponds (i.e., Warm
Springs Ponds),  an area between the northern
most   pond  and  the  Clark  Fork  River's
beginning point, and a series of wildlife ponds
are located in close  proximity to  the streams.
Contamination at the site is the result of over
100 years of mining  and process operations in
the area.  Mining, milling, and smelting wastes
were dumped directly into Silver Bow Creek
and transported  downstream to the Clark Fork
River with final  deposition downstream as far
as 130  miles.  The three  settling ponds, which
cover  over  four square  miles,  were built  to
allow  the wastes from  mining, milling, and
smelting operations   that  were  deposited  in
Silver Bow Creek to settle out before discharge
to the Clark  Fork River.  An  estimated  19
million cubic yards  of  tailings  and  heavy
metal-contaminated sediment and sludge have
collected in the ponds. An estimated 3 million
cubic yards  of  contaminated tailings remain
upstream of the ponds,  along the banks  of
Silver  Bow Creek.  Principal  threats from the
site include the possibility of pond berm failure
due to  flood and earthquake damage that could
release millions  of cubic yards of tailings and
sediment to the river.  Furthermore,  the creeks
are contaminated with dissolved  metals, and
exposed soil and tailings are contaminated with
elevated  levels of several metals.  The primary
contaminants  of concern  affecting the  soil,
sediment, ground water, and surface water are
metals   including  arsenic, cadmium,  copper,
lead, and zinc.

The  selected  remedial  action  for this site
includes raising and  strengthening all  pond
berms; increasing the capacity of settling Pond
3   to   receive   and   treat   (using   metals
precipitation)  flows  up  to a  100-year  flood
level, and constructing new inlet and hydraulic
                                              195

-------
structures to prevent debris from plugging the
settling Pond 3 inlet; upgrading the treatment
capability of Ponds 2 and 3 to treat all flows
up  to  the  100-year  peak   discharge,  and
constructing spillways for routing excess flood
water  into  the   bypass  channel;  flooding
(wet-closure) all dry portions of settling Pond
2;   reconstructing   the   Mill-Willow   Bypass
channel,  and removing  all remaining  tailings
and   contaminated  soil  from  the   bypass,
followed   by  consolidating these  with dry
tailings and contaminated soil within the dry
portion of settling Pond  1 and  settling Pond 3,
capping  and revegetating  the closure areas;
dewatering wet portions of settling Pond 1,
covering  the area with a RCRA-type cap and
revegetating; constructing interception trenches
to collect contaminated  ground water  in and
below settling Pond 1, then pumping the water
to settling Pond 3  for treatment; establishing
surface and ground water  quality monitoring
systems; and implementing institutional controls
and  site  restrictions.    Decisions  concerning
remediation of  contaminated soil, tailings and
ground water in the area below settling Pond
1  will be made  within one  year, pending
evaluation of  various wet-  and  dry-closure
alternatives and public  review.  Until these
decisions are made, soil  cleanup levels cannot
be   determined.      Three   chemical-  and
location-specific ARARs  pertaining  to water
quality standards  and  potential  solid waste
disposal  requirements will be waived  in this
remedy.    The present  worth cost for this
remedial  action is $57,416,000 which includes
an estimated annual O&M cost of $379,000 for
5 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All exposed tailings and contaminated soil in
the Mill-Willow  Bypass  have already  been
removed  and placed in the closure area behind
the settling Pond 3 berm.  Final soil cleanup
levels will be set within one year of this ROD.
Ground  water pumping and discharge for
treatment in the pond system will comply with
State  standards, with the exception of arsenic
(0.02 mg/1) and lead (0.05 mg/1).  State surface
water concentrations  of  arsenic and mercury
require an ARAR waiver based  on technical
impracticability and the fact  that  this is  an
interim remedy.  The replacement criteria are
arsenic 0.02 mg/1 and mercury 0.0002 mg/1 at
the beginning of the river.
     INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Restrictions will
     be enacted to prevent residential development,
     swimming,  and  human consumption of fish
     from the site.

     KEYWORDS:      ARAR   Waiver;   Arsenic;
     Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;  Clean Air
     Act; Clean  Water Act;  Closure  Requirements;
     Direct  Contact;  Excavation;  Ground  Water;
     Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground  Water
     Treatment;   Institutional  Controls;  Interim
     Remedy; Lead; MCLs; Metals; Mining Wastes;
     O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite  Discharge;
     Onsite  Disposal; Onsite  Treatment;  Plume
     Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
     Sediment;     Soil;    State    Permit;   State
     Standards/Regulations;  Surface Water; Surface
     Water Monitoring;  Surface Water Treatment;
     Water Quality Criteria;  Wetlands.
             WfflTEWOOD CREEK, SD
             First Remedial Action - Final
                   March 30, 1990

     The Whitewood Creek site is a mine tailings
     deposit area near the town  of Whitewood in
     Lawrence, Mead,  and Butte counties,  South
     Dakota.  Situated along 18 miles of Whitewood
     Creek, the 2,018-acre site consists of woodlands,
     farmland, and residential homes.  From 1877 to
     1977, arsenic-rich  tailings from gold and ore
     mining and  milling operations, conducted by
     the   Homestake  Mining   Company,   were
     discharged directly into Whitewood Creek. The
     tailings,  which consist of finely ground  rock,
     residual  metallic and  non-metallic compounds
     not   extracted  from  the   ore,   and   trace
     compounds used during the extraction process,
     were deposited downstream from  the  mine.
     The largest  tailings  deposits  at the  site are
     found along the floodplains of Whitewood
     Creek and   the Belle Fouche and  Cheyenne
     Rivers. Since 1977, however, material from the
     ore  milling process  has been treated  prior to
     backfilling residual material into the mine, and
     process  water also has been treated  prior to
     discharge into Whitewood Creek. The tailings
     are  the  major source of contamination at the
     site affecting onsite soil in residential areas and
     continue  to  leach   metals   to  surface  and
     subsurface   waters.      A    1989   remedial
     investigation revealed that   some  residential
     properties contain arsenic levels that presented
     health  risks.   Soil  in the  residential   areas
     contain arsenic contamination as a  result of a
     building  in  the  tailings   area,   windblown
196

-------
tailings, and the use of arsenic-contaminated
soil as a soil conditioner and a driveway base.
Approximately 12 residences are estimated to
have   arsenic-contaminated   soil  exceeding
100 mg/kg.   The  total number  of  affected
residences, however, will be determined during
the remedial design  phase.   This Record of
Decision   (ROD)   addresses    the
arsenic-contaminated  soil  in  the  residential
areas.   The  primary  contaminant of concern
affecting the soil is arsenic.

The  selected  remedial action  for  this  site
includes removing and/or covering frequently
used  areas with  clean surface  soil  (arsenic
<20 mg/kg)  in residential  areas with arsenic
levels  above 100 mg/kg  followed by  offsite
disposal of the arsenic-contaminated  soil,  if
approved  by EPA, and revegetation of the
remediated area; soil sampling at all remediated
areas  to confirm that  arsenic levels are below
100 mg/kg; implementing institutional controls
including land access restrictions; conducting an
annual  education  program   to  inform  site
residents  of  the  potential   health  hazards
associated with exposure to tailings, soil, and
downgradient   ground    water;    refining
knowledge of the extent of the contamination
and  delineating  the  100-year  floodplain of
Whitewood  Creek;   and   surface   water
monitoring.  EPA is  invoking  ARAR waivers
based  on  the  technical   impracticability of
remediating contaminated  ground and surface
waters.  The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $882,813, which  includes
an annual  O&M cost  of $12,000 for years 1-5
and $6,000 for years 6-30.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Contaminated surface soil  in  frequently used
residential  areas will  be excavated if arsenic
levels exceed 100 mg/kg (based on 104 target
risk level).

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Land  use
restrictions  will  be  implemented.   Ground
water well  installation restrictions have already
been  implemented  and will  continue  to be
enforced.

KEYWORDS:     ARAR   Waiver;   Arsenic;
Background Levels; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct  Contact;
Excavation;  Floodplain;  Institutional Controls;
MCLs; Metals; Mining Wastes; Offsite Disposal;
O&M; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations;    Surface   Water
Monitoring; Water Quality Criteria.
                                             197

-------
                           RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 9
                          (American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam,
                               Hawaii, Nevada, Trust Territories)
        APPLIED MATERIALS, CA
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The 9-acre Applied Materials site is an active
equipment  manufacturing facility   in  Santa
Clara, Santa Clara County, California. The site
is  located  within  the  San   Tomas Aquino
floodplain,  and  land  use  in   the  area   is
primarily  light  industrial,  commercial, and
residential.  Shallow ground  water  at the site
is  a potential drinking water source.  Onsite
operations   include   manufacturing   vapor
deposition  equipment   for   use   by  the
semiconductor  industry.   In  1983,  Applied
Materials  discovered that several leaks and/or
spills from three onsite underground tanks near
Building 1 had contaminated onsite soil and
shallow ground water with  VOCs  and other
organics.  In 1984 and 1985, as part of interim
onsite  cleanup activities,  Applied  Materials
excavated and removed  underground  tanks,
piping,  and more than  60  cubic  yards   of
contaminated onsite soil,  and installed  an  air
stripping unit onsite to treat VOC-contaminated
ground  water.  This Record of Decision (ROD)
provides a final remedy for contaminated onsite
ground   water  at   the   Building   1   area.
Remediation of onsite contaminated soil will be
addressed in a subsequent ROD.  The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the  ground
water  are VOCs  including  PCE,  TCE, and
1,1,1-TCA.

The  selected remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  onsite pumping and  treatment   of
contaminated ground water using an existing
air stripping unit, followed by onsite discharge
of the treated water to surface water; ground
water    monitoring;   and    implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions.
The  estimated present  worth  cost  for  this
remedial  action is  $715,000.   No O&M costs
were provided for this remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels will  meet State
and Federal Drinking Water MCLs and include
PCE 0.005 ug/1 (MCL), TCE 0.005 ug/1 (MCL),
and  1,1,1-TCA  0.0032 ug/1   (MCL).    It  is
estimated  that the  time  needed  to restore
ground water to beneficial use will be 50 years.
INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will  be implemented to limit site
activities and ground water  use   until  safe
drinking water levels are achieved.

KEYWORDS:    Air  Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Direct  Contact;  Drinking Water
Contaminants;   Floodplain;  Ground  Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground  Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; O&M;
Onsite Discharge;  PCE;  Plume Management;
Safe  Drinking  Water  Act;  Solvents;  State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
     COALINGA ASBESTOS MINE, CA
       Second Remedial Action - Final
             September 21, 1990

The  557-acre Coalinga  Asbestos  Mine  site, a
former asbestos  processing area and  chromite
mine, comprises part  of the Johns  Manville
Coalinga Asbestos Mill  site in  western  Fresno
County,  California.  This rural  mountainous
area is used primarily for recreational purposes.
From 1962 to 1974,  asbestos ore  from  several
local  mines was processed and sorted  onsite,
and  the  resulting asbestos mill  tailings were
periodically  bulldozed   into  an  intermittent
stream channel.   Subsequently, from 1975 to
1977,  a  chromite  milling  operation  was
conducted onsite.  Tailings were often washed
downstream during periods of stream flow, and
the resuspension of asbestos fibers  from  the
tailings   into the  air produced  a significant
inhalation  hazard.   As  a  result  of these
activities, approximately 450,000 cubic yards of
mill tailings  and  asbestos ore remain onsite
within a large tailing pile. Other site features
include  an asbestos ore storage/loading area,
an   abandoned   mill  building,   an  inactive
chromite mine, filled-in chromite settling ponds,
and  debris.     In  1980  and   1987,  State
investigations indicated  that  the  site  was
contributing  a significant amount of asbestos
into  the  surface  water.   This  site will  be
remediated as two Operable  Units (OU).  This
                                              198

-------
Record  of  Decision  (ROD)  addresses   the
remedial action  for  OU2, the Johns Manville
Coalinga Asbestos  Mill  Area.   The  primary
contaminant of  concern  affecting  the  surface
water is asbestos.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  consolidating contaminated soil  and
asbestos  ores within  the tailing pile; grading
and  revegetating the tailing pile  to  reduce
erosion and increase stability; diverting surface
water away from the tailing pile; improving an
existing sediment trapping dam by constructing
a  concrete spillway; dismantling  the  mill
building; paving the  mill  access road;  and
implementing engineering controls, institutional
controls including deed  restrictions, and site
access  restrictions  such  as  fencing.    The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action  is $1,947,000,  which  includes  a total
O&M cost of $815,000.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:  A
specific  cleanup level for asbestos  was not
determined due to uncertainties in  sampling
parameters; however, the  selected  remedial
action will reduce  the excess lifetime  cancer
risk to the  level  of 104 to 10*.

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:        Deed
restrictions  will be implemented  at the site.

KEYWORDS:    Air;  Asbestos; Carcinogenic
Compounds;  Clean  Air  Act; Direct  Contact;
Excavation; Inorganics; Institutional  Controls;
O&M;  Onsite  Containment;  Onsite  Disposal;
Public Exposure; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface   Water;    Surface    Water
Collection/Diversion; Surface Water Monitoring.
      INTEL (SANTA CLARA III), CA
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 20, 1990

The Intel (Santa Clara III) site includes a  plant
that   performs  quality   control  testing  of
chemicals    and    electrical   testing    of
semiconductors in  Santa Clara, Santa  Clara
County,  California.     The   site  is  in  a
predominantly industrial area,  and overlies a
major ground regional source of ground water,
the Santa Clara Valley ground water basin. In
1982,  the State conducted  a  leak  detection
program, which identified VOC contamination
in an  onsite shallow aquifer.  Possible sources
for  the  contamination  may  include   the
accidental dumping of solvents  into an acid
neutralization tank, accidental spills near an
above-ground  solvent  storage  facility,  and
cleaning of solvent-contaminated  pipes during
plant construction.  It has been determined that
no  onsite source is presently  contributing  to
ground water contamination.  Since 1985, Intel
has been pumping  and treating ground  water
using granular activated carbon  as an  Initial
Remedial Measure   (IRM).   This  Record  of
Decision (ROD) addresses a final solution for
restoring ground water  to  its beneficial use.
The primary  contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including TCE.

The selected remedial  action  for  this site
includes installing an additional extraction well
onsite; continuing the pumping and treatment
of ground  water using  an  existing  granular
activated  carbon   adsorption  system,  with
regeneration    of    carbon    filters   offsite;
discharging   treated water  to  onsite surface
water;   conducting   a  treatability  study  to
evaluate the  effectiveness of pulsed pumping
techniques   that  enhance  the  removal   of
contaminants adsorbed  to soil and  allow for
aquifer equilibration; ground water monitoring;
and  implementing   institutional   controls,
including deed restrictions  to  limit  ground
water use.   The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $594,400. O&M costs
were not provided.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Ground water  cleanup  goals will reduce the
excess lifetime cancer risk for carcinogens from
10"4 to  10"*, and will reduce  the Hazard  Index
(HI) for non-carcinogens to a value of 1 or less.
Chemical-specific  goals  include  TCE 5 ug/1
(State MCL).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Deed  and
ground   water  use  restrictions  will  be
implemented until  safe drinking  water  levels
are achieved.

KEYWORDS:    Carbon   Adsorption  (GAC);
Carcinogenic  Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground  Water; Ground  Water   Monitoring;
Ground  Water Treatment;   Initial  Remedial
Measure (IRM); Institutional Controls; MCLs;
O&M;  Onsite  Discharge;  Onsite  Treatment;
RCRA;   Safe  Drinking   Water   Act;   State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;    Treatability
Studies; VOCs.
                                             199

-------
               INTERSIL, CA
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The 12-acre Intersil site contains two industrial
properties,    Intersil,   Inc.,    and    Siemens
Components,  Inc.,  in Cupertino, California.
Since  1978,   Siemens   has  manufactured
semiconductor  products   for  optoelectronic
applications at the site.   Former underground
waste-handling facilities,   which  have  been
removed, included five unvaulted waste solvent
tanks and  an unvaulted  acid  dilution basin.
Solvents are currently stored above-ground and
wastewater is treated in an acid neutralization
system. From 1967 to 1988, Intersil operated as
a  semiconductor  assembly  facility.    Two
vaulted and one unvaulted underground acid
neutralization systems, now  excavated,  were
used  in  the operation.   Both  facilities  used
various  organic   solvents  and  commercial
mixtures.  Contamination, a result of releases
from the underground waste handling facilities
at both plants, has been detected in  soil and
ground water beneath the site.  A contaminant
plume also  has been detected, which affects
offsite ground water.  In 1983,  Siemens began
onsite  soil vapor  extraction, and subsequently
in 1986, began pumping and treatment of
onsite  ground water.   Intersil began  onsite
ground  water  treatment  and  soil  vapor
extraction in  1987.   This Record of  Decision
(ROD) outlines the  final remedy addressing
onsite  source  areas,  and  onsite and  offsite
contaminated  ground  water.    The  primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including PCE, TCE,
and  toluene; and  other  organics  including
phenols.

The  selected remedial  action  for  this  site
includes  enhancement and/or expansion of
onsite  and  offsite ground  water pumping and
treatment systems, which use air stripping, and
the soil vapor extraction  systems, which use
carbon adsorption at  the Siemens and Intersil
facilities; excavating  40  cubic  yards  of soil
contaminated  with  greater  than  10 mg/kg
semi-volatile organics at the Siemens facility,
followed by  offsite  disposal;  pumping  and
treatment of  offsite ground  water  using  air
stripping; discharging all treated ground water
to onsite  surface water; and  monitoring soil
vapor  and   ground  water.    The  estimated
present worth cost  for this remedial  action is
$18,750,000.   O&M costs were not provided.
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
Ground water cleanup standards were chosen
as the more stringent of Federal or State MCLs,
or State Recommended Drinking Water Action
Levels (RDWALs).    Chemical-specific   goals
include PCE 5 ug/1  (State  MCL), TCE 5 ug/1
(State MCL), and toluene 100 ug/1  (RDWAL).
Soil cleanup goals have  been set at 1 mg/kg
total VOCs for vapor extraction, and 10 mg/kg
total semi-volatile organics  (including phenols)
for soil excavation and offsite disposal.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:      Air   Stripping;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC);  Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking  Water  Contaminants;  Excavation;
Ground  Water;   Ground  Water Monitoring;
Ground  Water  Treatment;  MCLGs;  MCLs;
O&M; Offsite  Disposal;  Onsite  Discharge;
Onsite Treatment;  Organics;  PCE;  Phenols;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; Solvents;
State  Standards/Regulations;  TCE;  Toluene;
Treatment  Technology;  Vacuum  Extraction;
VOCs.
             J.H. BAXTER, CA
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The  J.H.  Baxter  site  is  in Weed,  Siskiyou
County, north-central California, and consists
of the  33-acre  J.H.  Baxter  facility  and  the
adjacent  870-acre Roseburg Forest  Products
facility.  These properties continue  to be used
for wood  treatment  operations and lumber
product manufacturing.  The site is surrounded
by pasture and woodland areas with residential
areas to  the north and west. Man-made and
natural   wetlands   exist   within   the   site
boundaries,  and Beaughton Creek runs through
the eastern  portion  of  the site.  Since 1937,
wood treatment  operations at  the site have
involved  a  variety  of   chemicals  including
ammonical copper-zinc-arsenate, creosote, and
PCP.   Numerous waste  products  have been
generated including tank and  retort sludge,
process  water,  storage  area  drippings,  and
spilled raw  preservative compounds.  Prior to
1983, when the State ordered the  J.H.  Baxter
facility to  cease  all waste  disposal  practices,
onsite  waste  management  involved  onsite
disposal  and  discharge,  spray  irrigation  of
wastewater  onsite, storage in tanks  and  ponds,
and  discharge  of wastewater into the bermed
                                             200

-------
area around a 500,000 gallon  tank, once used
for creosote  storage  and  currently used  for
process water storage.  These disposal practices
and leakage from storage tanks led to soil and
sediment  contamination.    Water  that  was
collected by  the lumber  operations drainage
system  was discharged  to Beaughton Creek
until 1987, at which time a carbon adsorption
system  was  installed  to  treat  the extracted
ground water.   The primary  contaminants  of
concern affecting  the  soil, sediment,  ground
water, and surface water are organics including
PAHs  and dioxins;  and  metals  including
arsenic.

The selected  remedial  action  for this  site
includes  excavation  of 41,000 cubic yards  of
contaminated  soil,  followed  by  biological
treatment  for soil with organic  contaminants,
chemical  fixation  for soil  with  inorganic
contaminants, biological treatment and chemical
fixation for  soil  with  both inorganic  and
organic contaminants,  and  onsite  disposal  of
treated soil in  lined  cells;  leachate collection
and  treatment;   ground   water   pumping,
followed  by  biological  treatment, chemical
precipitation, and polishing,  prior  to  onsite
discharge    of    treated   ground    water;
implementation  of institutional  controls;  and
long-term  ground water, surface water, and air
monitoring. All sediment in the site drainage
system  with   detectable   levels   of  wood
treatment  chemicals  will  be excavated  and
treated with stabilized soil.  No remedy for the
Beaughton Creek sediment is proposed unless
additional  data  indicate  the need  for further
action.   Surface water contamination  will be
controlled  through soil remedial  actions  that
will reduce contact between the contaminated
soil and surface  water.  The estimated  present
worth   cost  for  this  remedial   action   is
$37,829,100, which  includes an  annual O&M
cost of $1,207,600 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Chemical-specific  cleanup   goals  for  soil
remediation   include   arsenic    8  mg/kg
(background),  carcinogenic  PAHs  0.5 mg/kg
(10* risk level and detection limit), and dioxin
1 ug/kg  (detection limit).   Chemical-specific
goals for ground water remediation are based
on MCLs or non-zero MCLGs, State MCLs, the
10"5 to  10* risk  range, or  whichever is more
restrictive, and include arsenic 5 ug/1  (10"5  to
10* risk range), PAHs 5 ug/1 (detection limit),
and dioxin 0.000025 ug/kg (lO"5  to 10"*  risk
range).
INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions will be required for all areas where
treated waste has been deposited.

KEYWORDS:     Air   Monitoring;  Arsenic;
Biodegradation;   Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Dioxin;  Direct Contact;  Excavation; Ground
Water;  Ground Water  Monitoring; Ground
Water  Treatment;  Inorganics;   Institutional
Controls;    Leachability    Tests;   Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals;
O&M; Onsite  Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs;  RCRA;  Safe  Drinking   Water  Act;
Sediment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Treatment Technology.
         LOUISIANA-PACIFIC, CA
            First Remedial Action
             September 28, 1990

The Louisiana-Pacific (L-P) site is comprised of
an active wood processing plant and a landfill
in Butte County, Oroville, California.  The plant
and landfill are 1/2 mile apart,  separated by
another Superfund site, the Koppers Company
site.   The plant lies within the Feather  River
flood plain with the river located 1/2 mile west
of the  site.   Area  land  use  is agricultural,
residential, commercial, and industrial.   The
plant  rests on mine tailings created by dredge
mining  activities conducted from  1900 until
1969.  Since 1970, plant activities have included
log storage, lumber production, and hardboard
manufacturing.   Wood  wastes  have  been
disposed of  onsite  at the  landfill.   Possible
sources  of contamination at the site  include
discharge  of  wastewater  and  plant  process
wastes  from  the   site,   and   contaminants
migrating  from  the  adjacent   Koppers  site.
Between 1970  and  1984,  a fungicide  spray
containing pentachlorophenol (PCP)  was used
onsite to  prevent fungal  discoloration of  cut
lumber. In 1973, State investigations discovered
PCP   and   various   other  contaminants   in
downgradient ground water and surface water,
as well as,  sawdust and  wood  waste at  the
plant  and  landfill. In addition, contamination
has been  detected  at the  adjacent  Koppers
Company  site.  This Record of Decision (ROD)
documents an interim remedy and the need to
collect  additional   data   on   arsenic   and
formaldehyde levels on and near the site.  The
primary contaminants of concern affecting  the
                                             201

-------
soil and ground water  are  VOCs including
toluene; organics including formaldehyde; and
metals including arsenic,  lead, and zinc.

The selected  interim remedial action  for this
site includes  onsite ground water monitoring;
and    implementing   institutional   controls
including  deed and well permit  restrictions,
and site access  restrictions,  such  as  fencing.
The  estimated  present  worth  cost  for this
remedial action  is $193,000.   There  are  no
significant  O&M  costs  associated  with this
remedial action.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
EPA has determined that before final remedial
action  goals for the site can be set, additional
information  is   necessary   to   determine
background  arsenic   levels  in   soil,  and
formaldehyde and  arsenic levels  in  ground
water.  Therefore, no chemical-specific goals are
provided for  this remedial action.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and well
permit  restrictions will  be  implemented  to
eliminate exposure to onsite contaminants.

KEYWORDS:  Arsenic; Chromium; Floodplain;
Ground  Water;  Ground Water  Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; Organics;
Pesticides; Toluene; VOCs; Soil; Ground Water;
Zinc.
      OPERATING INDUSTRIES, CA
    Third Remedial Action - (Amendment)
             September 28, 1990

The 190-acre Operating  Industries  site is  an
inactive municipal landfill in  Monteray Park,
California. Surrounding  land  use is primarily
industrial,  however,   53,000  residences  are
located  within three miles of the site.  Onsite
disposal activities began in 1948, and continued
until  1984.   Wastes accepted at the  landfill
included household and  organic refuse, scrap
metal,  non-decomposable  inert  solids,  and
liquid wastes. The landfill was capped with a
soil cover after operations ceased.  Two 1987
Records of  Decision  (RODs) addressed  site
control, monitoring, and leachate management.
A third ROD, signed in 1988, addressed landfill
gas migration  control  and  documented  the
implementation   of  an   active   landfill  gas
collection and treatment  system.   Since that
time, continued settling of onsite landfill wastes
and the occurrence  of subsurface  fires  have
decreased the  integrity of the existing landfill
cap.   As a result, oxygen and  precipitation
have  intruded landfill  wastes.   This  ROD
amends the original 1988 landfill gas migration
control  ROD  to  include  the  addition  of  an
upgraded landfill cap.  A final comprehensive
site remedy will be addressed in a subsequent
ROD.  The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the air are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, and toluene.

The amended selected remedial action includes
capping  the  landfill  to  reduce  surface gas
emissions, to  prevent oxygen intrusion and
surface  water  infiltration, and  to provide  for
erosion control; installing landfill gas extraction
wells around the perimeter and on the top of
the cap; collecting and treating landfill gas by
incineration; and  dewatering  saturated landfill
zones.  The estimated present worth cost  for
this  amended  remedial  action ranges  from
$125,300,000 to $181,300,000 (based on the range
of costs for the gas control system and landfill
cover), which includes an  annual O&M cost of
$3,700,000 to $4,100,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
A destruction and removal efficiency of 99.99%
for each organic landfill  gas component will be
achieved   in    accordance    with    RCRA
requirements.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:  Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:   Air Monitoring; Air; Benzene;
Capping;   Clean   Water    Act;   Closure
Requirements;   Direct   Contact;
Incineration/Thermal   Destruction;   Landfill
Closure;  O&M;  Onsite  Containment;  Onsite
Treatment; PCE;  RCRA;  ROD  Amendment;
State  Standards/Regulations;   TCE;   Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
          SOLVENT SERVICE, CA
        First Remedial Action - Final
             September 27, 1990

The 3-acre Solvent Service (SSI) site is an active
treatment, storage and disposal  facility in San
Jose, California.  Land use in the vicinity of the
site is industrial and commercial.  Since 1983,
SSI has been operated  as  a treatment, storage,
and disposal facility.  Mixed and  segregated
solvents have been  recycled by a variety  of
methods including distillation, separation, and
blending.      Approximately   99%  of  the
                                             202

-------
recoverable  solvents  are  recycled  and  then
reused and consumed by industry. After VOCs
were  detected  in   the  ground water,  the
California Water Quality Control Board adopted
Waste Discharge Requirements requiring further
site  investigations   and  implementation  of
interim  remedial measures.  In 1988 and then
again in  1989,  the Board  adopted  Revised
Waste    Disposal    Requirements    requiring
completion of the pollution investigation, final
installation  of soil  cleanup  measures,  and
submittal  of an  RI/FS  and  RAP.   Interim
remedial actions conducted  during the 1980s
included the removal of underground storage
tanks,  paving  storage,  unloading,  and  spill
containment  areas,  placing  berms  in  the
treatment and storage  areas;  and  changing
operational procedures to minimize the risk of
additional  contamination.   SSI is  currently
operating a  containment/extraction system for
the  ground  water  plume.     The  primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground  water  are  VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene, and  xylenes.

The  selected  remedial  action  for  this  site
includes capping  the entire  site with asphalt;
operating a  steam  injection   and  vacuum
extraction (SIVE) system  for the removal  of
VOCs from  soil; extracting ground  water via
three  excavation  trenches and five ground
water extraction wells, and treating the ground
water using bio-treatment, carbon adsorption,
and  air stripping;  soil and   ground  water
monitoring; and implementing deed restrictions.
The  estimated  capital cost  for  this remedial
action is $948,000 with an annual O&M cost of
$1,172,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR  GOALS:
A soil  remediation goal  of 1 ppm total VOCs
has been set to protect the ground water from
future  VOC leaching.  Inorganic soil cleanup
goals  have  not  been   established  due  to
uncertainty surrounding  the natural occurrence
of metals  in soil  in  the  South   Bay area.
Ground  water  remediation   goals  include
benzene 1 ug/1 (State MCL),  PCE 5 ug/1 (State
MCL),   TCE  5 ug/1 (State  MCL),  toluene
1000 ug/1   (Federal  MCL),   and   xylenes
1750 ug/1 (State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL    CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be  implemented to  control
residential development of the property  until
cleanup standards for  soil and ground water
are achieved.
            KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Capping;
            Carbon   Adsorption   (GAC);   Carcinogenic
            Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
            Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
            Monitoring;    Ground   Water    Treatment;
            Institutional  Controls; MCLs; MCLGs; O&M;
            Onsite  Treatment; PCE; Safe Drinking Water
            Act; Soil; Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
            TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies; Treatment
            Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Xylenes.
           STRINGFELLOW, CA
           Fourth Remedial Action
             September 30, 1990

The Stringfellow site is an inactive hazardous
waste  disposal facility in Riverside County,
California, approximately 50 miles east of Los
Angeles. The site is divided into four zones:
the  onsite/upper   mid-canyon  area, which
includes a  17-acre, inactive industrial disposal
area  in the  southern  portion  of  the Jurupa
Mountains (Zone 1); the mid-canyon area (Zone
2); the  lower canyon area (Zone  3); and the
community of Glen Avon (Zone 4).  From 1956
to 1972, approximately 34 million gallons of
industrial   waste   from   metal   finishing,
electroplating, and  DDT production activities
were disposed of in unlined evaporation ponds
located throughout Zone 1.  Some of the wastes
from  these ponds migrated  into  the ground
water  system and  were transported 2 miles
downgradient (under Zones 2 and 3) to form a
ground water plume  beneath the  Glen Avon
community (Zone 4).  Between  1975 and 1980,
the State removed  approximately  6.5  million
gallons  of   unspecified  liquid   waste  and
DDT-contaminated material from  the site.  In
1980,  EPA  removed approximately 10 million
gallons  of   contaminated   water,  reinforced
containment  barriers,  and  improved a truck
loading area.  Further removal actions included
installing  french drain system fences; removal
of all  remaining  surface  liquids;  partially
neutralizing and capping the wastes; installing
a gravel drain network, monitoring wells, and
surface  channels;  and  constructing  a surface
barrier   and  leachate    collection   system
downgradient from the  original   evaporation
ponds.  In 1983, the  first Record  of Decision
(ROD) provided an interim remedial measure
and addressed additional fencing of the  site
and implemented erosion  control  and offsite
disposal of the extracted leachate.   In  1984, a
second  ROD addressed  construction of  an
onsite  pretreatment  plant  for contaminated
                                             203

-------
ground  water,  and  the  third ROD in 1987,
specified  installation  of  a  ground   water
extraction system  in the lower canyon area
(Zone 3), as well as  surface channels to direct
surface  water  runoff.    This  fourth  ROD
addresses the contaminated ground water in
Zone  1  (an  interim  measure) and  in Zone 4,
and proposes treatability studies to remediate
the source material in Zone 1. A future ROD
will specify  the source  treatment methods as
well as  a remedy for any remaining ground
water contamination  in Zone 1.  The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water include VOCs  such as TCE.

The  selected  remedial   action for  this  site
includes dewatering the bedrock in the original
disposal  area (Zone 1),  followed by ground
water treatment at  the  existing pretreatment
plant, and offsite discharge to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW) facility; ground water
pumping and treatment using air stripping or
granular activated  carbon, and reverse osmosis
in Zone  4,  followed by onsite reinjection or
disposal  in  an  industrial  sewer;  conducting
field  tests  on  reinjection  of  treated ground
water into  Zones  2  and 3; and  performing
treatability  tests on  soil vapor  extraction at
Zone  1.   The estimated  present worth  cost of
this  remedial action is $115,000,000,   which
includes unspecified  O&M costs.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
No remediation goals have  been determined in
this   ROD   for   Zone  1   ground   water
contamination,  because  this  is  an interim
measure.  Chemical-specific goals  for ground
water in Zone 4 include  TCE 5.0 ug/1 (SDWA
MCLs).

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not  applicable.

KEYWORDS:      Air   Stripping;   Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Clean Air Act; Clean Water
Act;   Direct   Contact;   Drinking    Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground  Water
Treatment;   MCLs;  O&M;  Offsite  Discharge;
Onsite  Discharge; Onsite  Treatment;   Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW);  Safe   Drinking  Water  Act;  State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;   Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
           WATKINS-JOHNSON
          (STEWART DIVISION), CA
        First Remedial Action - Final
               June 29, 1990

The Watkins-Johnson site is an active research
and development, manufacturing, and industrial
complex in Santa Cruz County, five miles north
of Santa Cruz, California. The Watkins-Johnson
Company has owned and operated the complex
since 1963, conducting such activities as: metal
machining, degreasing, metal plating, and photo
laboratory activities.  During these activities, a
variety of organics, inorganics, and metals were
used.  In 1984, Regional authorities found TCE
and TCA in  the Watkins-Johnson wastewater
disposal   system.      Further  investigations
revealed  soil contamination  at  the site  and
ground   water  contamination  in  the  Santa
Margarita aquifer  underlying the site.   The
aquifer  has  been  designated a  sole-source
aquifer  used  for  drinking   water,  and  is
comprised of a perched zone and  a regional
zone.     In  addition,  the aquifer  is  easily
accessible for drinking water  supplies and for
contamination from the ground surface.   The
primary contaminants of concern  affecting the
soil and ground water are VOCs including PCE
and TCE; and metals including silver.
The  selected  remedial  action for  this  site
includes  soil  vapor (vacuum) extraction with
pretreatment of extracted vapors using granular
activated  carbon  (GAC)  prior  to  ambient
discharge; capping and grading  contaminated
soil  areas to  minimize  the potential  for
mobilization of soil contaminants to the ground
water;   installing  infiltration  leachfields  to
prevent  offsite  migration of ground  water
contaminants in the perched  zone;  installing
gravity  drains  to  transfer the  contaminated
ground  water from  the perched  zone to  the
regional aquifer zone for subsequent extraction;
ground water pumping and onsite treatment to
remove  contamination  from both the perched
and regional zones using GAC adsorption with
offsite regeneration of spent carbon; discharging
the treated  water  onsite for industrial  and
consumptive  use and to recharge the perched
zone or  offsite to  surface water; and ground
water monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost  for  this remedial  action is  $2,156,243,
which includes an estimated annual O&M cost
of $167,820.
                                             204

-------
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water treatment standards for both the
perched and regional zones  were based on
chemical-specific SDWA  MCLGs or  the more
stringent of SDWA MCLs or MCLGs and State
MCLs, thereby achieving a residual risk of 10"4
to 10^  Chemical-specific goals for ground
water  include  PCE 0.005 mg/1 (PMCL) and
TCE 0.005 mg/1 (MCL).  Soil remediation will
ensure that soil no longer poses a threat  to the
ground water; however,  no  chemical-specific
goals have been set for the soil.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls will be  developed and implemented
during the remedial design/remedial action.

KEYWORDS:   Capping;  Carbon  Adsorption
(GAC);   Carcinogenic   Compounds;  Direct
Contact;   Drinking   Water   Contaminants;
Inorganics;  Ground  Water;   Ground  Water
Monitoring;    Ground    Water   Treatment;
Institutional  Controls; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Discharge;  Onsite Containment;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite  Treatment;  PCE;
Plume Management; Safe  Drinking Water Act;
Soil;  Sole-Source  Aquifer;   Solvents;  State
Standards/Regulations;    TCE;   Treatability
Studies;   Treatment   Technology;   Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs.
                                           205

-------
                            RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
                                         REGION 10
                              (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington)
          FMC YAKIMA PIT, WA
            First  Remedial Action
             September 14, 1990

The FMC Yakima Pit site is a former pesticide
formulation facility in central Yakima County,
Washington. The site consists of a 58,000 square
foot fenced area on the northeastern portion of
a 10-acre property.  Pesticide dusts and liquids
were manufactured onsite  from 1951 to  1986,
and between 1952 and 1969 wastes containing
pesticides were disposed  of in  an onsite pit.
Raw material containers, soil contaminated by
leaks or spills from process equipment, broken
bags,   and  off-specification  materials  were
disposed of  in the excavated pit and covered
with dirt.   After 1969, waste materials  were
disposed of offsite.   Beginning in the 1970s,
liquid  products  were  formulated  onsite,  a
process  that used solvents,  emulsifiers  and
stabilizers.   Spills, leaks, and other  accidental
releases of these  liquid formulation materials
are believed to  be sources of soil and concrete
contamination.  A 1988 remedial investigation
confirmed hot spots of DDT and other pesticide
contamination  in  the  former  disposal  pit.
Investigation results led to two removal actions
in 1988 and  1989, which included excavating,
removing,  and  disposing   of  850  tons  of
contaminated soil from the waste pit.   This
Record of Decision addresses the contamination
that remains in  the formulation areas and some
contaminated soil in the  former disposal pit,
including 900  cubic  yards of pesticide- and
metal-contaminated   soil   and   portions   of
buildings and  other concrete structures  that
contain high levels of pesticide contamination
including  1,460   square   feet  of  concrete
structures.    The  primary  contaminants  of
concern  affecting  the  soil   and  debris  are
organics  including  pesticides  and  metals
including chromium.

The  selected   remedial  action  for this site
includes excavation and  onsite incineration of
contaminated   soil;   dismantling   of    the
contaminated portions of the buildings and, if
necessary, repairing those buildings  where the
removal of portions of the buildings affect their
safety or structural integrity; onsite incineration
of contaminated concrete building structures or
offsite  disposal  at a RCRA Subtitle C-permitted
hazardous waste facility, depending on volume;
analysis of the ash  from the incinerated  soil
and  debris prior  to  onsite disposal if the  ash
meets cleanup goals or offsite disposal  if the
ash remains contaminated; and  ground  water
monitoring to confirm  source removal.   The
estimated  present worth cost  for the  remedial
action is $1,755,000,  which includes an annual
O&M cost of $33,000.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR  GOALS:
Health-based  levels and  cleanup goals  for
contaminated    concrete    structures   were
determined based on a 10* cancer risk and  a
Hazard  Index of 1.0,  and include chromium
1.0 mg/kg.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.

KEYWORDS:    Chromium;  Clean  Closure;
Debris;  Direct Contact;  Excavation;  Ground
Water    Monitoring;    Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;Metals;   O&M;  Offsite   Disposal;
Onsite Disposal;  Onsite Treatment; Organics;
Pesticides; RCRA; Soil; Treatment Technology.
  FORT LEWIS LOGISTICS CENTER, WA
         First Remedial Action - Final
             September 25, 1990

The 650-acre Fort Lewis Logistics Center site is
a military storage and  maintenance facility in
Pierce County, Washington. Surrounding land
use is mixed residential and commercial.  The
site overlies a surficial aquifer, and a  deeper
bedrock aquifer that is used as a water supply
to  over 85,000  people  in  the  area.   The
Logistics Center is an industrial complex, which
includes warehouses, motor pools, maintenance
facilities,  and  an  equipment  disposal  yard.
From the  1940s  to the  mid  1970s, solvents
including  TCE  and   PCE  were  used  as
degreasers during maintenance activities.  The
solvents were frequently combined with waste
oil  and disposed  of at several locations within
the Logistics Center.  Site investigations  from
1985  to  1988 detected  VOC contamination in
onsite  monitoring  wells  and  offsite  private
wells.  As a result  of these findings, affected
residents were connected to  a  public  water
supply.    This   Record  of Decision  (ROD)
                                              206

-------
addresses  restoration  of  the  contaminated
surficial ground  water aquifer, and provides a
final remedy for the site.   Confirmation soil
sampling  and further  characterization of the
deep aquifer contamination will be evaluated as
part or this  remedial action.   The  primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including PCE, TCE, and  DCE.

The selected  remedial  action  for  this site
includes  pumping  and  onsite  treatment of
ground water using air stripping to remove
VOCs; discharging the treated water onsite to
infiltration trenches,   including  one  trench
located upgradient  to  facilitate flushing of
secondary  contaminant   sources;  long-term
monitoring  of  ground  water;  conducting
confirmation  soil sampling; investigating the
deep   aquifer   contamination   for   possible
remediation;  and  implementing institutional
controls.  The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial  action  is  $9,068,000,  which
includes  an annual  O&M  cost  (exclusive of
maintenance) of  $517,000 for 30 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup standards are based on
Federal MCLs and include PCE 5 ug/1  TCE
5 ug/1, and DCE 70 ug/1.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:   Institutional
controls will be implemented  onsite and in
downgradient  offsite areas affected  by the
contaminant plume.

KEYWORDS:    Air   Stripping;  Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground  Water  Monitoring;  Ground  Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; O&M;
Onsite Discharge;  Onsite  Treatment;   PCE;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations;   TCE;   Treatability
Studies; VOCs.
      SILVER MOUNTAIN MINE, WA
        First Remedial Action - Final
               March 27, 1990

The five-acre Silver Mountain Mine site is an
abandoned mine dump in Okanogan County,
north-central  Washington.   Land  in  the  site
vicinity is used primarily for cattle grazing, and
the nearest well, two miles away, is used for
cattle watering and irrigation.   The  nearest
residence  is  three  miles south  of  the  site.
Operations at the mine were initiated  in 1902
to extract silver, gold,  and copper  from soil
and ore.  From  1980 to 1981, a cyanide leach
heap   of  previously  mined  material  was
constructed in an attempt to extract (leach out)
silver and gold.  The heap consisted of 5,300
tons of ore on  top of a 20 ml  plastic liner.
About 4,400 pounds of sodium cyanide were
mixed with  water and sprayed on the top of
the heap.  The cyanide-laden effluent was then
collected in a leachate pond at the base of the
heap.   The heap  leaching  operation  was
abandoned in late 1981 without cleanup of
contaminated    material.       In   addition,
approximately 5,200 tons of unprocessed mixed
material (mine  dump) lie to the west of the
leach heap.  In  1982, the State took action to
treat  the  cyanide at the  site using  sodium
hypochlorite to partially neutralize the leachate
pond and heap.  In 1985, the State conducted
a  site  stabilization  effort,  which  included
removal of liquids from the leachate pond and
installation of a 33 ml  plastic  cover over the
heap  and  pond.  Empty cyanide drums were
also removed, and a fence was installed.  The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and mined material in the leach heap, mine
dump, mine  drainage area, and bedrock are
metals including arsenic (naturally occurring)
and   other   inorganics  including   cyanide.
Ground  water  beneath   the   site   contains
relatively high levels of dissolved anions and
cations  as  well   as   metals   and   cyanide
associated  with  the  mine  dump  material,
however,  low   ground  water  quality  and
quantity make  it an  unlikely drinking water
source and  will not  be addressed  by  this
remedial action.

The  selected remedial action  for  this  site
includes consolidating all contaminated soil and
mine  dump  material  with  the  leach heap,
followed  by  grading  and  contouring  the
consolidated 5,740 cubic yards of contaminated
materials;  capping the heap and consolidated
materials with  a soil/clay cap; plugging the
mine  entrance and  removing a mine drainage
pipe  that  supplies the animal  water supply
tank and installing a new well for an alternate
animal water supply; implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions; and ground
water monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for the remedial action is $635,600, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $39,650 for 30
years.
                                             207

-------
PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS  OR GOALS:
All material contaminated with concentrations
of arsenic greater than 200 mg/kg (based on an
HI=1 and a cancer risk level of 10"4) or cyanide
greater than 95 mg/kg (based on an HI=1) will
be consolidated and covered.   Ground water
treatment  will  not  be  implemented  unless
monitoring  detects  concentrations  exceeding
standards  set for six contaminants  including
cyanide 154  ug/1 (based on a health  advisory),
and arsenic  6 ug/1  (based on 104 cancer risk
level) at the point  of compliance,  which  has
been  established  100-200 feet downgradient
from the edge of the leach heap.

INSTITUTIONAL   CONTROLS:       Deed
restrictions  will  be implemented to prevent
disturbance  of   the   consolidated,  capped
material.

KEYWORDS:  Arsenic; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean  Air  Act;  Direct Contact;
Excavation;   Ground    Water   Monitoring;
Inorganics; Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals;
Mining Wastes;  O&M;  Onsite  Containment;
Onsite Disposal; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations.
         TELEDYNE WAH CHANG
           ALBANY (TWCA), OR
            First Remedial Action
             December 28, 1989

The Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) site,
in Millersburg, Oregon, is an active plant used
to produce nonferrous  metals  and products.
The site consists of a 110-acre plant site,  which
contains  the plant's former sludge ponds, and
a 115-acre farm site, which contains four active
wastewater  sludge ponds.   Portions  of  the
TWCA site are within the Willamette River's
100- and 500-year floodplain.  The Wah Chang
Corporation began operating a U.S.  Bureau of
Mines  zirconium  metal sponge  pilot  plant
under  contract  with the U.S.  Atomic Energy
Commission in  1956. Additional facilities were
subsequently built near the plant beginning in
1957  to  produce  nonferrous  metals  and
products. The Lower River Solids Pond (LRSP)
and Schmidt Lake sludge pond, which  stored
wastewater   generated   from   the   plant
operations,  are  being  addressed  by this
remedial action.   The  3-acre LRSP received
sludge from TWC's onsite wastewater treatment
plant  from  1967 to 1979 and  currently holds
approximately  75,000 cubic yards of sludge.
Schmidt Lake covers 0.6  acres and accepted
approximately 10,000 cubic yards  of  sludge
from  1974  to  1979.  The  sludge  in both the
LRSP and Schmidt Lake contains heavy metals,
organic  compounds,  and  trace  levels  of
radionuclides.    Because  the  ponds contain
radioactive  materials and are a potential source
of ground water contamination, TWCA decided
to cleanup  the ponds without waiting for the
full site remedial investigation to be completed.
This interim action addresses the contaminated
sludge  in   the   LRSP  and Schmidt   Lake.
Contaminated soil in the sludge ponds will be
addressed  as part of an overall  site remedy.
The primary contaminants of concern from the
sludge  in  the  ponds  are organics;  metals
including chromium, zirconium, and lead; and
radioactive  materials.

The  selected  remedial  action for  this interim
remedy  includes excavation  of  85,000  cubic
yards of sludge with partial solidification of the
sludge,  followed  by  offsite  disposal  in  a
permitted solid waste landfill.   The  estimated
present  worth cost for this remedial action  is
$10,716,000, with no O&M costs.

PERFORMANCE  STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The  selected  remedy will  attain  Federal and
State  ARARs.  Individual contaminant goals
were  not  specified for this interim remedial
action.

INSTITUTIONAL  CONTROLS:   The   offsite
disposal facility  will comply with solid  waste
disposal permit requirements to  ensure that the
sludge mixture is isolated from the surrounding
environment.

KEYWORDS:      Carcinogenic   Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air  Act;  Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Floodplain; Interim
Remedy; Lead; Metals;  Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment;   Organics;  Radioactive   Materials;
Sludge;     Solidification/Stabilization;    State
Standards/Regulations; Treatment Technology.
                                             208

-------
                               SECTION III

                RECORDS OF DECISION SUMMARY TABLE

                                 FY 1990
The FY 1990 Record of Decision (ROD) Summary Table provides an overview of site
problems, selected remedies, cleanup criteria, and estimated costs provided in the
RODs signed during FY 1990. The table is presented by Region, in alphabetical order
according to the site name.

-------




















V
1
to
1
"8
!
4)
i*
g
fe



















t- "O V5
0 C to
> (0 0
> [ J
sis
CJ CM *S
&



J2

C.
3
C
B
6






Components of
Selected Remedy

V
g
_3
"Q
QJ

(A
1

E
 ^y f v) ti
-•§1 s ^^
U °- ™ 60 60-2 Si T3
•DO . o 3 C
^W»^«C^§«
ycjXSi C'u s OTJ
C ". (jA .C O ^ fl] _Q U
-^eS 5s S!"B o
l-ffg ^ s Is g
1 6b2^2 f S o a

eEij«n'5^c^ .
•B«gEc|uE;fa
s§!i°-^!i;e
gaj2«-s.gjii^lS
«Ct£sn2it3s"T3
u S-^c^ a-S-cS
= c'S>,«!nlenJ«"Sre
c2^ E^^ 1 SJ Sg
..
(0 _^ O,
^fc- W5 -S CO
o ra u
Offsite leachate treatment at a wastewater
treatment facility prior to offsite discharge c
treated effluent to offsite SW; offsite
incineration of the sludge generated during
leachate treatment; monitoring of landfill g,
and providing the criteria for excavation of
contaminated soil deemed impracticable to

•^
CJ
c
I
tn
o
•b -a
a c
•2 -c ™
S -c  re





E
•^
3




o
o
S-2
Sg
v> ti
60
•^ s-
^
C
"^
o^
w E
y .,
ft .
j?S
X 0
bo c
C flj
e _g
uj a
312
o re


process; GW pumping and treatment using
chemical precipitation, air stripping, and


a1
wa
i
T3
1

-S3
c1 *^
^5 |
l-a
.= CQ
u uT
'c 1
n3 C
£?^
O 0,




o
o
c^
t







< uf
>• T3
> C
8-S
-1
«i
E  55
> vj
^2 w1
cs O
si f ^
DO W
^, S
U> A
g ^
S u
TJ S

•S 're
biological treatment, prior to recharge into
aquifer or discharge to onsite SW; treating






-a
c
re
u
'S
re
£l
11
"3 i!
E-g






to







? ^1
.S 3 S
-a w ,-> j=
-2 y °
c "S
.S _r •= 60
W 3 g =
S u e o
C ^< " «K
o S re «

'^ ^•'v ^a
™^2§
•S w $£ .S
13 ai — ^
nj r; *X •*
•= 1 3 3
N M
•g s-^M
ra A co O

S
V -r=
from the air stripper using incineration or
activated carbon filtration; implementing sit
access restrictions; and air and GW monitor




























1

O
in
g

r-j
fj

1
^
c

1


























211

-------
a E
C «J
-,
        : -g i s 1 s
        : oj o o,
          T3 D.CJ

          oS'S
       G  S s§ s

       S  ^ll
      ffi
i
 2

 S
            O^  en
                             ell §
                             £.* °>
                              to -a s -a o
                              j_, 18 'C <5 _
                              c fa S ^ 1

                              ms*

                              s§ln
                             j-  ~
                       212

-------
5 c
^ «

s a
o
Q.



I
Components of

Selected Remedy
     O
     o
     CO u

     sf ££•
     S S c

     §ai
               *

             '
                               !u^*a;M_3xr  c

                               II.M  1|!I
                              -s
                                "S -S g g I £ f
                                -S-BS^Je!
                                g §ti="S.||
                                     -
leanup levels are

ating GW and SW;
soi

nd
eering controls; collecting

l gases, followed by vapor

rption; GW and air

plementing institutional

deed restrictions
       0
       o
      SlillllK
53
        g,.g

        IS
        3 T3
              <>•
              0
                                         o
                                            *
                                            .
                              •S S f= -S! S C •- 2 « (U -C


                           i.-UU^^H1:*'
                           - cS^-.S'5 « g)'ft= £i iTra'Co
                           ogg*^:ii'S'5fSa.-SoSS
                           ±I-S-sfi§i-sgg'Sa'g?i§
                                              U
                                           X  C
                                           - M IB 3 X. ,, C~
                           O C in
                           to _ra co
                         gl^S  IE
                         E .E =5 -S » S |
                          E 3. ° i E E
                          I Sw'!^ 8
                           =3

                           »
                        ^ 0
                        —T _,

                        '   -
                          .
                         "5 5 '0 -a
                      _,  rri W '£3 3
                      e -1 y Sf S 1
                      w ? S. o £,.£

                           2
                                o
                                o
                              o^  S
                              o  ^2
                           213

-------
^
•£ "O en
tls
S -s.S
CU U4 IV
Sfl co °«
£ U O
a,



en
1
U
CM
D
C
CO
a;
U




Components of
Selected Remedy

CU
_3
O
>
jy
w
•2
5

I
Threat/Prob

Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Actior
c
0
°5o
S
o f
O OS
CN O O
IN S ™ -
2 Ss S |
*>~ £ S "I c
Sal si
.a -a
's u -S £ S <"
S P 1 % * a
0 T3 "3 « ~i>,xl
«2 c e - |° o
1JJO81
?tjsi*
*§ ~ E § 'i -
cu H o _-
£8 6o<-g^
- (X _* 1 U_ 3 u
•- -S ^ in S, CN S
g -a g in g,tN ^
^IS^slI
60
•1 » S c ^
.3 .E .2 M a .b
Excavating and treating soil and sediment i
low temperature enhanced volatilization;
backfilling treated soil and sediment and
covering with clean soil; pumping and
treatment of GW using filtration, air stripp
and carbon adsorption followed by reinject
onsite; decontaminating buildings; removin
drums, debris, and sludge for offsite treatrr
and disposal; disposing of all treatment
residuals offsite; and conducting GW and a


fi ^
-o c
X T3 C 'S
0 ^ ?,.£ « »
0 r= .-, =6 T3 ^
in o g S >*.3
o" -iS m *£> in •£>
 rri J£ -n
T3 > _ n 13 m
3 w -S s v, S
« -a | t ^ P -a -
s-slfllil
I^Sl^S-e-
l^l-sSBMl
"-liS^'Sl I
• — ^ C?s~ bbTj i-
^-S8ggc3.l-5
OJ
>- 'x
* E
CO 5 CO
c ^ Q o c
II 1 1 '"
11 1 § -a
< E-1 tn o cs


CN














monitoring
















o
o
O *-J
8"§£
Sli
.2
rs
-•a
— CO tn
S en J3
ll^
£ w|
— -a <
CM C I.
3 CO CU
e - S
S g&
u -a so
fc £.s
tg X
til
"co cu
.CJ J=
Pumping and treatment of GW using chem
precipitation, air stripping, and granular
activated carbon; incinerating fumes from I


"8
ta
'C
s.
«

o
•z.
Jl
'5
1.1
GW contaminal
VOCs including
benzene, PCE,
c
Chemical Leama
Tank Lines, NJ


CN

8-S
 H
u
oj ^ '5
3 ri $
iSg n
\ cu ^J
>Sd
1/3 S
I-H ^_^ ^^
U TT S
C K>, CO
S S? ™
R 3 W
S rt ^
-° w x
tx>y »
.5
"^ /-N I"~l
- M W
.ES^
o
n j h^
air stripper onsite; discharging treated wati
onsite SW; GW monitoring; and conductinj
funher studies concerning contaminant







-a
«£
•1=6 E
ra 3 3
TCE; other org
and metals incl
arsenic, chromi

Former Liquid
Tanker Truck
Terminal and






in
•u
_S
E_
AJ
3 C
e ".
O /"N
S 3
-C CJ
u S
A
O1 QJ
^J *-J
U co
S «
s,s,
60 60
3 3
0 0
in m

'o
characterization and design and operation
the treatment system









•a
_
c
.0
Cleaning Operat










9


1
1



1
in
8"
f>

CM
3
C
CO
CU
~s
5
u
CJ
IS
I
(A
i
CU
U

S

£
tfi C
ai
Si rH
CO CU
c/i g
§ S S
is QJ
E ,3 Z
OJ CJ QJ
•s s^
3
5 < "3
0 > c
> ..—
"8 9 -a
K "3 C
CO u_ CO
•° o .
a si
™ § CO
2
CO
£"§
ra «
U5 ^Cx-N
^^ a s
x S S
3 J£!S


deep aquifer; GW monitoring; and
implementing engineering and institutional
controls







.El
"i n
"y W
.S 2 M
other organics
PAHs and pher
metals includin

Landfill
09/28/90

























T3
C
CO
E
1
u
o"
'S
CU T3
SJ

w



214

-------







































OJ
£
CO
s
K



i
C T3 V3
o c 5
1 w 3
"^ — U
111
|c33

c/;
U
a.
3
e
S
u




Components of
Selected Remedy
OJ
E
3
~3
•>
V
w
^
>


B
cu
_Q

p
>
CO
cu
u
s

^ o

41 r? U
P- Q ^
^ §3
oJ 2 -5
4-1 P3 CJ
See
w .5? S
<*> CS
c
o
'5b
cu
a


o
o^

so" c
«a





•a
QJ
ts
I
M
1

Excavating and treating onsite soil using low
temperature enhanced volatilization;



f*i
"S
O /— N
O 13
~-£


5
u -s

"§ '^
CO ^
~ s
•c ra
i .s
CU c
"°. 1
'& 8

>"•


- S
II
£ £
-2 "o
u <£


CN




/— \
i











redepositing the treated soil onsite;
decontaminating an onsite building, which









of
y HD
^ c
60 CO
i <"-
^ c
3 v
u 3
•S o
O tlT
O U
> F-

£*


tu
"ro
•c
u
x
3
TJ
C




!2
o jS
s s.
~

Ss
1-1 c&
5&










w
includes removal, offsite disposal and treatmer
of asbestos insulation; excavating and treating








a
c
CO
bO
« IV!
o oo
u .S
CU T3
-C 3
S.=

QJ tfl
S s
•S. v
x E





o
Os
0>
CN
£
O







0
^H
O











underground storage tanks and their contents,
liquid wastes, and associated contaminated soi








t3
g
CO - -n
^ = d^ s 1 §£ c
HS21§1^|
E^S^-oo^-Sog
silyiilli

Excavating soil, temporarily storing the soil
onsite before transporting the soil offsite for
rotary kiln incineration, followed by offsite
disposal of residual ash; pumping and onsite
treatment of GW using air stripping and
emissions controls, if necessary; reinjecting
onsite the treated GW from the upper aquifer
upgradient of the contaminated area;
discharging the treated GW from the




**i
^^
«'§
0 •£•
a
y 5-a
. S -a S> S
c > c ff ™
8 js ™ ° « £
0 •B rjj t. m .S
•^> 'C ri 4J rn "O
? 5 p x: y 3
^•g "s Ng 1
^ £i C JT C — 3
f|lslll
•= e u ^ o ,
"ffl ^
fi —
u rs
'2-5 M
I2. ± | .i
H t- ™ «? E
c dj ^ oo
5 s -s ^ :
£d £ § S


CM










M
•S
8-
T3
U
Si
CQ
&

intermediate aquifer to an existing borrow pit
area; and continuing site access restrictions





























1
§§

Kill
£££§

u
1C
9 1
S^JP
c c "to
SB I*
"111
? ffl " 3
s y n o,
g o 2 Q,
cB -53 c co
^ « (fa
Jj (3 0 CO
W flj ^b^
(J J ^ M
Sill
n
Permanently relocating all residents; sampling
and, if necessary, decontaminating, salvaging, i
disposing of mobile homes remaining onsite
after completion of permanent resident
relocation; and implementing site access

7
CU
1C
1
£,
S
2
g>g,
T3 T3 S
•o a ^ 3
CU CO U "o
"5 .E •£ c i-
J2 r" """ CJ
g E w w J3
« S •- 13 o
™ ti c *3 °
^ 1 as-s
73 U £7 C3 C
S s ° «r *
=5 1^5"S
« -g & 2^

>-
2 ~o
G
C c - ™
 QJ S
Sf s 2L
03 | 8
b to « a,


CN


*?

S
g











restrictions















.a
2
CO
|
TJ
C
IS
h~J

"g
•§
13
C



215

-------















icord of Decision Summary Table
K
1
f
ft



















^
C -o
o e
> ™
s.a
QJ OH
I3












S

S



J2
o
a.
3
C
_




Components of
Selected Remedy
















.

a;
1



a;
3

IX

i_


c
o
Remedial Acti
c
o
'5b
OJ
PS
'
Q

$252,700,
c
o
•a
2
•S
5
"S
S
1
3
8
1


60
C
'•3
_3
1
60
C
1
tw
T3
C
ro
60
_e
1
S

^

_
cs

.c
'i
"8
en
C
*S
c
8
1
E"
_3
'a
T3
3
c
o


cs



o
$348,700,
•o
£
£X
«^
ro
0
'o
60
o
A


Montclair/West Orange Radium site soil) and



,-,
1







S
E
3
TJ
2



S







a
CO
*C
1
_c
60

y
10
c
-Q
1
1
•J


other radium-contaminated materials from























xT
tt
o
present w
based on
selected
"8
I
5
X
QJ S
=3 1
^ ^
li
II
« ro


c
o

transports











residential and public properties, followed by
offsite disposal; filling excavated areas;
environmental monitoring; and continued
treatment technology studies to reduce the


















Residential
Community






















06/01/90







1 1
1 S











volume of materials disposed of offsite


















"ro
c
E
"O
c
cs







S- g o So
F: § •§ 2-1
»— i CV P CS O
w -iJ ?  - S c?
T3 CJ ^ "O
tj 60 Tj
e .E a fc c
'5 -a u £ —
K 3 Cu 4^ w
2 T3 . ° ~S
c c " \n U
° '3 § i E
cSglfll

5
^
•! 1 |
.S 4J ^
1? a Cl „
5 fl § -


cs














^_
o
interim ARAR waiver will be invoked as part
this remedial action























216

-------
g| 8

c!
« §"=8
Si o o
   a
Si

R
        .  «^.g   -
        |"S a § g'g.g 8 g «|-g1
        ^'
                                  60

                                  •3
                         .
                             l!  1
                                is
        s ^ = To afi>

        £ =3 cu  § «i ^ |
        i in   ii

        1
        I
        o
       •o
        c
       g
       ffi«
S  .2
                      .9 ~
he ex

g/kg,

500

SCA Spil

EPA's "Gui

Remedies

with PCB
m

>
                      ^K°
                      E ™ -S

                      sil*
                      A |^

                      11.
                      ST3 S
                      •p C ^2
                      S ™ eg
                      g=£?
                      E S-5
 S «
 2 lif
'j5 "> .0
 i E I
 s-§ s
 ™- £
 .1.SS

 Hi
 8!^
 1s-
a
in

ted
  1
js ?
CJ <£i

•a §1
ffl 's w -a
U (0 . rv O
£ C _e *-<
  
-------
US
c.§S

ISl
   '5b
         g?i§.l^
         •= .s  _
         w E eo 2 .2
         S S -g w S
         * §!"§ 1
         W y M nj c
                              o
         "8
  !|i,j
    o

S" 3 h
-— 3 4J
  O
g_g»|

'E -O n J= £
                   'S -a
                   " c
                     ro
El2|
2T3 .°ooSBo-
S.S g «.E i.S.2
                -,•§ bcS"
                .E ra .B
         Si
                               .
                               1 if S -
                              O > w .S o
                o
                s,
                00
     c
     _OJ
     CQ

     3
                        'S >•
                        3 C~
                        S g-
                     r> ^~  G V



                     II  II
                                        I
                                   218

-------
£ -a «
| Si
— u
4-1 CS
c .s s

?

_OJ
JD
8
OH
>
V
£




£ §
fl 5,1
.§ill
w <5S .5? £
0/5 K
C
O
'Bo
S
o
S
or
00
00
Tt-"
w
K
a
cj
V
'S
o

o,
3
£
ts
"u
'5
t/5

V
•S
o
§
(S
'•&
re
1
u"
60
T3
_3
"w
I
60
C
•a
§
S
S


•a
<£
1
W5
O
2

QJ
•O











0
£ §9
^ m «
n °° &
9 (NO
? w ---
li i? || a-og
ii^|IIS Sg?
ffl E i! S ffm ^ 'T ^ u e°'oi
ra §-" i5 "^ ^ 3 1 -"1
•s-S-^'li-s'a 1 « "1 x,'5
'n^'S0o:^2S^w2a^
Qj5??ocsy5^?;UPnoc
-Ch-j c cj.o^-'^— 'JsH c_> cj cs
 J5 E- .5 cs
60
01 C
™ "E
5a
v *
§^ §
| 1 £ «s
£ £,= 
>
O

— r
tn
T3
C
J3
u
c
S
u
c
3


CN

4_J
c
QJ
8
S
-&
1
S
a
1
^

u
"O
J3
"D
c
W5
§
60

a
cs
QJ
f
S
i
^
tw
CS
Xj
c
's
T3
1
b
_g








60
C
^
3
CJ
_C
3

>






2




0
ij f^
o §
i I
75 _ *
r^s
>^I
CO
r^ O — •
, 0 ^
£jj . OO
M O 3

— *""'
/-^ 2 pq
dlE
S-S.H.
^-^
CU ^^ HJ
ts H ™
4J U 4-1
55- S SiS

table aquifer to capture contaminated GW;
supplementing the drain with extraction wells
screened within the Red Bank aquifer;






i/r
o
C a:
.S-g 2
o. S u
- E

y £ i
<^s g
i 2 b"
I w S
S u is,
Z P >t



I
(A
S
a.&
« r.^
ro u
5£





r-N
S
BBgS
s s s a
11^1
to e^ 55 —
^ ^ ^^ BO
~KX 1>. X 3
60 60 66 o
3 1/1
S ± ° P
^ ^r 10 c
c S .a i
Sees
3 Ji Si 2
"r"! >^ 1-2 ^*
" x re '0
o
constructing an onsite wastewater treatment
plant consisting of air stripping,
precipitation/filtration and carbon adsorption
dewatering and testing of residual solids for






-a
.*-
C T3
$ %
ili ™
(C ~
60 E
.E -2
^ E
- S
y h
.E "5




- I
^
•x. -0
O C
O CN







1
OJ
ra
£
^
ex
3

O
in
•g
_«
T:
2
re

offsite disposal; reinjecting treated GW or









































discharging into a recharge trench onsite; GW
and SW monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls





























-------
Present Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs

o.
a
1
u


Components of
Selected Remedy

i
J2
£
S
to
5
5


Threat/Problem

> S
^ S .2
„:• ;?> co t^
1 §,Q ^
to S  E
vj .2?  N
GW contaminated \
VOCs including ben
CU
3
c
S
<
12
•§ e£
c E
22

CN
1
•1
Z3
u
S
I
1
u
§
1
•o
c
IS
$18,600 -
$394,100





necessary; reinjecting the GW onsite with an
evaluation of the feasibility of using infiltration
basins as an alternate means of discharge;
covering the disposal area with clean fill;










u
g
•a
c
a


E
•a
c
5
OJ
S
£

















S
?;
c?
<>
o


(O&M, based
on differences





developing a contingency plan for the
installation of individual carbon adsorption















CD
C
'£
t
V)


in treatment
and





units on residential wells, which may become
affected by migration of the contaminant





















monitoring
systems)





plume; monitoring GW and SW; sampling the
sediment; performing a treatability study to
investigate the need for further treatments to



























remove toluene, lead, and chromium from GW;



























VI
1
8
1
°
£
1
tj
c
1
i
^c
a
-S
T3
C
(3



























on air stripper units





















« Is- 1
a If s
« S, 2 o
V» .3 5 ty»


1
1
U)
S
Excavating drums, containers, and highly
contaminated soil; consolidating the waste and
overpacking drums as necessary; containing
contaminated soil, and transporting the material
offsite for treatment (possibly incineration) and
disposal

13
1C
I
en

n
z

c
•c -E
JS LTT3
Soil, sludge, and de
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE,
toluene, and xylene
other organics inclu
phenols; and metals

^
— 3 e
8 g.-o|
P -3 c a
cu g ^ ™ J
M-5 .1 So'S b
'E S 02 = 3
5 S S 2^ S «
O CA
O i— '


220

-------
  ~
'
(3
  O.
  3
  C
  s
Components
Selected Rem
       22 QJ

       "8
       o
       0 >
  60

11
                  8
      S
                         |

                         •5 60
                         3-S
                         1> 3

                         gl
                         * 8
                         C
                         jy £T
                         =5 60 'C
                         a .5 2

                         III
                         ^ .2 E

                         S I 3
                         60 to S
                         •a ^ E
                         0 QJ S
                         X » C
                         w "Z S
                        CO ^S
                        "S
                  w
               JS  "w
               I  i
             .11
             il^ffl?
             jifi!
             •s "o a.-a "o
             5 iS ffl EJ .S
                             s
                                    co"
                                    8
                                    °
              8
              O £4
                                         £ I.
                                              S

                                        •S~H 60 g I 8
                                        -= 3 .S g1 < ."S
                                         aj C ^ u ^ n
i p .5 & 5 .•§   S
ii.E-3 bo, 55 TS "
•a 5 3 °  5 c 60
^liijs.;-!
a§rt«^.-s^-g

                                             60
                                             _c
                                          2
                               221

-------
1 e g
l> a o
^ — U
S S s
4J OH ^5
833
a.
49
a
3
C
£
0






ot
1 g
u A
I?
|j
o*








a
£
3
1
>
S
to
1
e
QJ
S
s
ex
>
s
h


fc g
«T "^ S S
C P4 1— ' •<
g?§ -s
a | «"S
•^ a .& §
to c<
c
.2
SP
c£
aj
3
___
"S,
D.
ra
O



V
3
S
"5,
a
ra
O


^
0
1
1
8
1
t
£
00
c c
2 'C
8 3
C8 -g
o o
z e


aj
£>
S

11






aj
Q
Z
IS
J2.I
5g
g E
ii
£3


(S














































is 2
Resideni
Subdivis




   8 „
    g
I J
CO U
I *
           -8-8
        M
   * 1 -8 8 -8 -s c S

   liilf


  •8
  w
   o
     yl
     T3 f
   •S-c" •
   •> s E
   S
  UHH
  :2 = -a ~ "2 Ti
  5 8 S .E a .S

T3 U
(5 _
     11
       222

-------
 in 2
J2  2
te u K
O £ ta
           w
           00
   !«3g-s
            •a


          'E -a
 -g^l 2gS;'S
™Et>0 J= .!
                                              |S||

                                  liaiSl Ill § =33 -a 55
                                  in
                                  vO
                                  CO
     u  c
     111
     2 1 E
ll.i;s^-s
« a •§  s «> J
.i .s "S  E? is »
«J S .S  o ^ .5
~ S  «  ^ 'G "g
—- g 0  u '= 2
                                  o
                                     >       —
                                     s   1 8..K
                              Z   =
                                      •a
    I
    u-
Ov   t/j
O   »—i
                             223

-------
u

    o
    g
    "8  .a 8
    tfl  c r"t
    .8 -3 ™ -g M
      y M E -a
    = < c g s
    i a =5 i ^
      9 3 U T4.
    .2 # 13 -.13

    £ a -s 9 S
       ra  O
    •O ... BO £0 i)
     llllllil
    IilPJ!
               ^
    IltHliP
    xl«'=l££!3'?
    w-S'-a E §. £> S .E g
    §i
    6 5
        •o .y

        CO fo
    « 5 eo g ° IS ." e1 i
    *r*  C 5* i— S wa ..3 P
    ^"Sl-2^ ^s^ I

    -11SJ«!11^
        !-E
           =

        -a - |


        III
1 around site perimeter
T3
S
E"
_3
Installing a ;
CJ
.e
o
tx>
c
1
1
£
s
o
IO
ib«
o
f
Q.
OJ
•a
CO
CO
c>0
tc
1
VI
.E
1
JO
X
.2
CJ
60
^C
'c
e
8
CO
•8
c.
2
u
'«
1
1
2
c
•§
2
E
temporary ir
itry of precipitation;
rithin the slurry wall
V
%
1
|c
surface to m
f
I
5
extracting G
>ose of dewatering onsii
tr
3
0.
0)
r-
L^
boundary foi
ovement of contaminate
E
bo
_c
|
8
•g
CO
1
:e; transporting extracte
*E3
CJ
"S

«-
X
CO
O
tment, treatment, and
CO
I
0.
Ui
o
c;
a
i
g
monitoring; and
5
w
•o
c
CO
^
O
W
'•3
S
"«
1
•o
1
<0
§
JU
<0
maintaining
                         "8
                         S
                         '0
                         R
                         o
                                   o
                                   Ov
I
                       224

-------
81
SI
2   •%
T3    ?,

<£    M /-<
                               I


                                                    •9
                                                    C
                                                    ra
                                             "•S
                               Hill? 1.1 II
                               •is s 2
        •a
        c
        w

        « &
                                >•
      u Q 
-------
 O

 a


 ra
a?
at!
 B
 O

 'Bo
      1
      1
      O
                     il
   •liifr

   1§S|E
   I 2 1 •§ SS


   1|1!1
   cu s^ cu TJ £
   S .§ "S g ^
   u c^ »S

   Illll

   I ^"TJ E H
"8
tc

1
                   §.
Soil contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
cu
o
[if
T>
E
CO
00
•3
3
'E
CO
S?
o
2
CJ
•o
B
CO
vi
a.
including chromium
and lead
".
a.
3
1/1
             •5*
             53 TO
             •a c
             is
   2 -K S - -o
    $N O ~ ^

   .St-si! -g s -g.
        5g> <2 ot S
      •o oo -ij S =
                               s §
                                              t—i  CX
                               l|111o§l^|S^
                               & j$ jz a u>-i" co o "t: -2 o o co
             If PI
             sil-il
       ssjs a E
                               cu
                               00
                               T>
                               _3


                               :-5
                               E O

                               |TJ
                               .1 e
                               TJ CO
                  S|
               •-  « oo

               illl
               11*1
        J2
        O


       Jl
                                         S |
                                  2 a " x = -a I

                                  §§I1M1
tN



fl
                               •g-S-
                               ja-g
                               "S? c
                        g
                           226

-------
12 E
c
OJ

 •&
                    Is § i
                    '

             8
    lilt! MHi
            TS
            c


            1
            0
                    IS
                    «
     . ™ ,,  •% -a g ^ e
     liilllllll

     3


     &
    =  2
1 3
go
"2
         2
  ^
  ^
E  ^
               B

               18 £•
               •a t
               £ ra

                          ?

                  ^  T3
                  »o  c
                  o  cs
                    227

-------
O
U
    o
    o
    ^- /->

    §.§
    fv a
        •a
        c
       £2 = -
      \ f — O *&
 «  -e o £8 * %
 1 g S/f-j^-aj?
«-2^1|s.a|
^j£|*ni*e

*iys^-
              .a
      •s « 5
      i-s <
       «„
      .E 3 .2
       If

       8-S'
     M
     0 8
     a J5 T3
     KH.S
       lla

       ill
     o ,-^
     o s
     o o
 I a-
"° e
•g •§ fl
          •c
     I
              o


       5eM  I
    _l&


   (SE 2

                           "8
                       I
                           if
                           ja M



                           'I 8
b

§<
a0:

•st
> -^
                           CQ CQ  r i
                                                  s
                                     I
                                     I
                                          o
                                          P
                                          o >
                        228

-------

































>
C
«
«
|
i
**i
•s.
o
o
00
^r
CO

•s"
u



E
"P
CJ
i
<
.
c*
£i
1
cs
S


CO

4_,
1
^_
o
^

§
K
R
^
^
-
8
00
,^


/•^
i S



.2
&
S
C
1



followed by offsite treatment; excavating 3£
yd3 of soil, sediment, and debris with



™
O
^-/

"8
«3
C

«J
C
o

>
1









c
V
£

T3
«

M
^
_3

.£
vs
~s
V

1

w
tt
!
1





IS
S
K
^
• w
'^1
s *
ll
;J
11
e^
_e
13
subsequent stabilization, followed by dispos.
a RCRA-permitted hazardous waste landfill;

V
-a

£•
CO


•o

_1J

c
to
y
i
^
*o
•o ^
«l
m -c
jn U5



I

1
c
&
3 •«
S ~
•o -a
§ ^
CJ ~°
ll
is
•S A:
s
>
backfilling excavated areas; placing a soil c<
over areas with lead contamination above



















o
o.
S
0







ep
^b
E
1/5
0
1
M
1
¥

•^
background; treating and disposing of 350
batteries offsite; GW and SW monitoring; ai



















I
s


















implementing institutional controls including







































site use restrictions
























o i
§o ^s* 5?
rf ± |3. °
11 i!

if ~ "§"§
O O r- flj
* C E
1 a K3
•a " "S '«? „
(v wa *3 Ci
!1^v
s?*|3
SS^c u re
III!
^ f= QJ (J >
Spls
§ §0,= V
(75 -g «'5 2

1



Che
                   ,1
                    o
                   O > a
                       S
                               S   •£
                          &
                        M
                        a S
                              o
229

-------
















cord of Decision Summary Table
K
o
g






















1-a
O C to
— CJ
C .ti *S



&


^
a
3
£
U



Components of
Selected Remedy
QJ
E
1
£j
co
^


E
2
a.
03
QJ
C




"fiY S
-. X ^ '§
ca c* QJ ^-
2 \ S .2
a ^ ™«
« 2 c p
1/1 55 .£« g
C/3 (X
C
_o
of
PS


0
JO


cs
V)

QJ
QJ
2
a
18
1!

£
1
O


Pumping and treatment of GW using air

1
1
W
O
Z
•s

T3
 E-


60
B
•a
18


2
S












18
CA
IU
Ej
s
4-1
i
o
c

C5
onsite discharge of treated water to SW; ai












<
^






£p
1





o /_N
S ^

IT) 00

w ^
& "e
llBislS^S
t« si "^ cj rv £j
LH O ^ •— " ^^ 6O bJ "Si
£ cxS m U u c U >
_;^g_WwS^H^
S's3'6oy oi55-a6
J2o P£>UGO
.5 60^-^ —.S 18^
E o 6btx Cto 18 "^^^u
2S^q t | ^ O g, £
8|w°||£||g|
^ "w S r^3 ^ — SQJ
3 .« ^J * ,^ *KX &H ^
— r" U U ri *S ^ "n1 CO "*^x *^~
CO -1-" ?• & W .> ^>. M . oO yj
D,U.SSE-'S>Uo 3«


GW and SW monitoring



















o
Os
-v.
5J T3
O\ C
0 M





O ^

o" f,
O c

«A -_-




•8
1C
1
w

w
1
Is
tfl
f^
To ^
41
II
CO Cw
3 OO
H
•gJS
E
1*

1
1

o

»
*c
•o •£
i '?
CO T3
QJ a
60 18
T3 C
3 "3
il
'18



QJ
fci
£
L- ^
^ 5J

CO




^^



*







o;
(A OJ
separator, and piping, and transporting the
materials offsite for disposal; excavating thi







-a
18
ll
•g-o
~ ".
c oJ"
sS
£J
QJ
tA
CO
CQ
£>
18
QJ
>
•a



s

S
O



«»








underground tank, oil/water separator,







w
's
E
•a
18

1
1


























60
dumpsters, and piping, and decontaminatin






.—
'S
c
-a
18
—
eo
c
^3
j3
.£





o
o5
1

















E
60 ftj
them using high-temperature steam cleanin
equipment; disposing of the contaminated !
cleaning solution and excavated debris and





















S

















^
S 2
structures offsite; and placing a soil cover i
the FT-3 area backfilling and grading excai

























230

-------
C T3 M
0 C t»
**<5
c .§ g
W m c£
1(33
D.
w
"n
O
O
c
c
«
JL
„_, >*
o "g
a E
c «j

S
3
<:



1
3
1
>

£
p^

x c
H o
LSI
Signature
Remedial .

1
60
U
c£

f^^
- e fi^
o S ^^ ^^ ^
« 9J -S «s S
(NBC S3
S-sl g s.
v* * — ' > kj ya
ti- Based on GW velocity and
m elimination of the source, GW
concentrations are expected to
meet background levels within 5
years through natural
;; attenuation. Chemical-specific
goals for GW include benzene 5
ug/1 (MCL) and vinyl chloride 2
ug/1 (MCL)
3 a _ y
e & > 2 o -c
JH «K 2 - 2 12
liVI'M
i s| « s E § 2
g > 2 '5 "S S S .3
|s.a|l58«
a'ifSS-fl8?
eg p! (JS £X ^ O ^ C
•s * 1 s 1 11 i |
•? S"£.s « gll*
_-a°«ooc-c6o
a o «j i- a .„••• oc
^aj^l^ S'S'S
|iii;ilis
J3 W3 £ X C3 ^ M
Itlflllll
d-i- oS c_^"" a'C
DnftJ U C  n
< _

- C
§ •§
K a s 1
*j QJ ON C
S 1 S? E
w o es .
° ^

CO
/— \
o °^
o O
O 4J *— '
S"§2 8
oo S C CN
c£ fe, S LO"
6» ^ ? 09
Any tanks, equipment, and
structures identified as a safety
hazard and health risk will be
decontaminated and removed to
an offsite facility. Any waste that
cannot be treated onsite will be
removed to an offsite facility
£l-o *§
"§§ 1?
ffili1
2 33 «£ 1
e e 1 •§ B -S
£ I £ S -2 -g
± g 1 b « «
S £
           '9 S S " < ">
           u5 i ja o a, (N
            60
          llflff
          S - M e 'S
            Co e O "
              -a o

               -  B
             11!
          •
        I *
          8s
          U M« 'I
          g.c^-g?
               .
               "§"§ b =
              S
           <;  e
          si  |s cj
          06  £1 S  «
231

-------
tl
3 o
z^la
s g I "8
•ssag
  c/3 a;
              I
     ^11^1
     £ -a u E x a

     :s s «
      '
     l
     1
     i
     2
     j£ c
     X S
                   1 S1 S

                   8.^8S

                   1P-


                   «fll
                   •n E 8 S?
                   (S T3 B
                   2 g S 'a



                   I  !!
                   •a e "S
                   C -s C T3

                   ||||





                   lid
                  o ^

                  U1 3

                  >-H O
                      c-S »-p^^

                      ms§
Mill!
« .2 c 3
  2 e
  •s-s
                      e - --g "
                   S "S -3 y ~o "3 ^"


                   = Sl^|-SgS B

                   11-S^II^I
                         •S 6
                  c
                  o
                  •a
                  re
                  4J .

                  Si
                     tc
                     •a
                     c

                     3
                     ts

                     S
                     232

-------
            I
              (N
             • O
I
o
ID
I
fll
§•
1
!*
o
•2-
11
35 S
Is


o
06/29/9


T3
_g
,3
                                   233

-------
C T3 "3
O C M
£f 5
a S .-
it*
E o o
a.


J3


a
1

Components of
Selected Remedy

V
3
"3
>
S
CA
CO
£

e



s



1? o
v S? a 'S
e I.Q <
CO C* «J —
Z \ 3 .2
„. V G -o
S S CO OJ
•S 2 c e
"> (/i .s? £
t/3 Bi
C
_g
'ee
cu
rt
o

S- -
. "aJ
"8 S
E ~
flJ r^
= g
qj U
3 u
v
°l
Is
11
 —
CO 4J
r- _ >
Itamination ii
1 maintain an
icentration le
o =5 o
CJ > U
GW pumping and treatment using equalization,
pH adjustment, chemical precipitation,
clarification, sand filtration, and carbon







n cS
cu n
S S
^ g3
S? u ^
.£ x 3
TD S "3
3 ° C
e w'«
•-" U v
Q i-c "5
pS ™ bo
> a o
1
O qj
"r -£
5 *-
^ s
< D.
CU "S
.S w
u —
™ o







o
o
o o
S3
SS

£
ns GJ ^
Qd U C
C/J 3 -S
_ -a c
gas
& CO §
w u °
<: £ >
a^ ^^ >
W >-0
|!§
e o. co
1 1 i
-C °J H
SUn


fc"s
CO ^
E^
•C E
&t>
ga
lo
ill
o-a CN
" § o
5 P u
O
o
o_
r~t S o
w. ^ f
^ c S
S&i
^M
*^3 *~H
S _:7
^8
S*^
^a S
o „ 1
« -| S
e S.s
to & g 3 g E
lllhl
| M .-g ™ W
^1H1|
118
adsorption, followed by injection into the onsite
mine pit; offsite disposal of GW treatment
residues; GW monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions.
A contingency remedy for OUI includes placing
solid waste in a RCRA Subtitle-C onsite landfill;







VI
S T3
4J CO
E tT v
C CJ —
"O 'E TD
C 4) C
re j£ c9
. « rt
w e
3^3
< .E •=
Sli
~ Tj >-
g.s-g




g
35
CN

O
O



























^j
(A




in c
r-l <-H CO
long-term GW monitoring, and institutional
controls. If the primary remedy for OUI is
implemented, no additional actions other than





























>•
C
!"£ §
.S -n O
e * °
11 I

u-5
•SB
« §
rh ^
a 
£°

S"2
o ^ £?
S 'g 1!
*— ' ^^ U








contingency remedy for OU3 includes
dewatering the site during excavation; isolating
the fill area from the onsite mine pools;










































treating the GW using equalization,
clarification, sand filtration, and carbon























































adsorption, followed by onsite discharge; and
GW monitoring. The selected remedy for OU4
including pumping and treatment of GW in the
Clarion Formation using air stripping, onsite air
emissions treatment, onsite injection of treated







































































GW; and GW monitoring





























234

-------
Components of
Selected Remedy
o
'5 w
o > S

03   U ^ ^
cd   < S u
                          &!
Action levels that will trigger tl
implementation of onsite GW
CO
CO
•o
Jl
of onsite and offsite G
onitoring reveal a nee
oo 6
Ji
II
1
1
o
:e treatment include concentratiol
'53
C
O
u
CU
'S
•§
ro
S
CO
O
remediation



will of chemicals of concern in exa
I
S
1
1
T3
C
ro
cu
M
3
'o
C
1
CO
"o
o



of MCLs, a cumulative
carcinogenic risk in excess of
10"5, or a noncarcinogenic HI :

T3
C
CO
to affected residences
1
"E-
a.
D
M
J{




SJ
(2
0
<4--
_|
S
_c
OJ
f
e
businesses.



>,
1
o
'i
£J
Q.
cu
JS
M
"S
i
V
•a
.S2
§
contaminati



i
2
3
o
1
I
1
fl
installed on



cu
_c
c
i
cu
to
2
1
1
•u
c
expanded ai





cu
•a
"u
r"«
ers. Treatment may ii
1
LH
^O




1
oc
'o.
o.
•fi
Sfl
l_
"3
1
S3
•g
.1
o
LH
3
2
00





•S
ir any combination of
exchange, c







techniques



     •?> 2
o>Jle
                          235

-------

















1
Decision Summary
^M
•s
1
a!
E


















1-a

> n3 o

c S 5
PO



1
o
a.
3
C
U



Components of
Selected Remedy

V
3
1

S
5

2
b
H

r^
s? .!
i ^u ""
Z \ 3 5
_s ^ g "8
"5 35 _bo g
en ns
c
.0
a?
ft
O
O
o_

o
o"

^
^
1
^
>4_l

'I
1
•S
3
S
1
i
_w
additional recovery we
Installing
1
!
M
O

f
1
2
c
o
0
1
S
E
Q
c
S
E-

00





S
1


S
1
^
^

2
1
5

1
1
S
§
•§
TO
LH
Si
5
|
1
CU
J3
^J
'o
-^
C
5





I
i
3
CJ
^C

>





ft.







21
1


B
^
O
y

^
i
•°

CU
•S
to
a
llowed by treatment of
£
T3"
C
CO
3







ffl
^u
>,
X
T3
B
CO
















•o
c
1
B
CO

S
i
5

CU
^
"S
60
_E
^
reatment facility; expan
^i
txi
c
M
'S











D.
"S
B
•^
CO
<





O
o

i

a
1
1

«

•S
I
u.

so
_c
CO
60
reatment facility; invest:
00
^g
tw
'x
u












'I
1
U
•a
S







g1
S
,
W
r
t
s
r_^

E
1
.—
U-H
o
QJ
3
'w
1
logic conditions on the
hydrogeo











1
M
5
«L>
CO
^









B
^ 0
11
l|
^o E


y'o
|!
0 n

To
B
O
•o
3
and implementing insti
:o restrict GW use
N
•c s
,  u  ° '-3
   _  CU  C "3
   -
^ S =3 's  ™

1    11
« u .= u .£
 E
 •3
'E
 2
S
 E
.2     oo

I    I
wed Leaching of contaminants to GW
g and SW will not exceed State
o .=
£3 CD
£ 3
- «
S a
i» .C
to u
5 «
•^ OJ
2 T.
situ dissolution of copper;
treatment of the resulting
W water quality standards, which
1/3
u*
O
§
'2
£
'•5
ysical chemical processes;
•o
c
co
^
o.
0
.0
1
CO
V
•o
J3
"u
^c
•O
C
to
xcavation
CU
w using drainage controls
&£•&&
chromium 0.011 mg/1. Discharge
from the GW treatment system
£•-0
"8 »
11
£ JS
=f 8
urralization of acidified so
site disposal. GW will be
v c
c o
1
S
0
i
I
1
a
o
•a
i
g
ated in an oxidation/settli
S
o
<>
T3
C
(0
o
vO
£
TJ
C
(0
1
CO
CO
to
£



1
3
en
•a
c
CO
C
S
: for Provision of an alternate water
S
1
W
S
T3
B
JO
1
1
,w
1
•a
•o
1
1
•o
b
5
JO
1
CO
a
1
'5
>,
o,
D.
3
(A
<^^
O
o
construct!
vision water meeting SDWA MCLs
a
0.
i£
3
S
£1
!
S
3
§
approximately 5.2-acre la
c
CO
>,
fl
CO
i
a. -a
g. c
co aj
2 a
an alternate water supply
residences; GW monitorir
. , O
O in


controls
"«
plementation of institution
.§


1
T3
•a
c
(0
i
i
13
.1 «
Jfl
I'S
cj (n
                                 I
                                 "u
                                  SL

                                                 3  CU
                                                73  S  -2
                                                .S  E  S
                                 •a
                                 j£    -a
                                              ex
                                              IN
         236

-------
  I
  ro



 I
   0)

   S
I
zs
         g
g~
  « II

                       1
                                                           i
                  ™ 7 5 s ^
                    fsu E eg

                    m .£ -a a  e
                    .E M e eo  E
                  u S 8 n c  g
                  •=> E •? .-^  e
                  o.
Il
                              l
          a
          C

         E
SS.1
«, -g e
                                                                g
                                 237

-------
O
0.
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
         o
         o
         o
                        8
    •
    elllillll
g
y
south Koppers
oil washin
ollowed by
te and
Ex
lag
n
    t-'8
                       •8
                       in
                       1
                   £
                        *
                          •a
                          C
                          co
    c     -
    lililll
12
8.
a.
q
    -§
    a
                        co "•••
                        S u .
                        c .c u u

                        IgSl
                        ^ vJ GJ "X
                        O > -5 2
                        JS
       "  o
         '
         o  o
         '
  las
§ s

                      238

-------
a
       "Milt!
       •a  y y c ur c
ui > £> a o ra
            §1

                   «
                           239

-------
8.1
3|
a.II-a
ill
 S .5,2
    60
 s^i
Illl
          8  S
                       o
                           g

                         fl I .5
                        .,K
                      '§"§ g-S
                      1 "i i? g>-B
                      S -S e .5 n
                      O >
                           .5 re
                           1
                             c
                          1  1
                           I   § 2
                            240

-------
Components of

Selected Remedy
r.ssK  A-S-S
*Flo  nl
<->STI S-Tosa-a n
8Sco^-3Suf«
Oo^c-'WO*^'-
t-iynj.st^Ouwo
'S
1-1
 •a •-
 ^ ^2 e
 ; H a |
 .S oj .2
m
   s-e
ctive La
28/90
Si  I  s S
                    241

-------
o
a
3
c
U
Components of

Selected Remedy
§
S)

S
O
o
O *j

0~
                o
                o
                MO
$4,83
           l
SJ5   &

§•8   &.

8:i   -a e
§ S a g §
v—' CX *3 U t-

/acuum extraction am
u
CJ
x:
o
•o
c
CO
>
£
o
c
CJ
J3
'o
VI
1
ITl
nj
.£
U
OJ
i
To
3
•a
1
CO
f
1
O
t»
c
1
1
5
O
BO
C
'a.
E
3
a.
>,
—
•s
_o
2
1
S
T3
C
CO
s
1
z
1
W3
•a
c
ca
W
s
1
1
o
_>,
T3
^
T3
3
w
V]
&
!5
CO
CO
tx>
                            C M -
                            o .S -S
                      S 5 _ c 8 n.2
                      ^'§i^i
                      ^ > 60 3 3  H
                      S > c -a   M o
                        IMSJH

   " e pIS





,O 0,43 _ w Cd "£
^ t7 « ^ C i- C
       S"S -a

     »>§,§ S



                   ,-a


           j'fi
          S 3 ij

          I c'I
  .2 "0 co E" £?:"'« o

  ffllifSs
  8 ?.«§! g"gs
  K •« -S « ~ '2

     5 S
     •8
     is
      o
                                .U
^5
w s


1?
  CO

g!

            -I-
            ,-a ca
               .
          c
     S
     U
                 _

          1 I ja a £
          S •— -CM QJ ^
          •a
        w c
          •S 2
        Illl
                o
                ON

                                         S
                               4_, CO t*-H _N
                                     OJ
                                  co^|

                                  2 «1

                                  a-S-8
                                           S
                              11
                                  jS S
                                   S fa
                                    SI
                            2   K
   i   (U
   1 "c «
   °«o
   CJ C 60
   ^£•1
   si a
   e O -S2
   C w -^

   | if-a
                       l-.-Sff

                       |1§I
                       •S r- J2 C
                       c ^ "S o
                       J '? a E
                       •o co § 5
                       S Si " O
                       S 
-------

















_0j
CA
Q
•8
1
a!

fe

















|| g

-•s5
g -R.S
(A m* 08
i °


1
O
c.
3
C
S
0




Components of
Selected Remedy
V
e
1
QJ
W
CO
^


_CJ
2
2
«£
>
03
Si


^ .2
| ^Q ^
z ^ | 3
M a e e
w « & |
W DS
C
•-•
&0
(S
1 t— 1
OJ "^
in oC
o^ *"!.
feS

1 1
ll
*?j "O

w ®
^ii r3
.3 S
S Q
QJ l£*
"6 J2
ll
T3
c
a j3
•n'a
11
N
|o
•§ s
S °
8-S
11
W ™
E  ^ CO
-'!-
I6l
test-pit caps with landfill cap material;
regrading the landfill cap to stabilize site
conditions; long-term GW monitoring and







M -
2 3
QJ £
^ 'I of
C "3 di
co ro O
f=?l
^ 3 .2
8 .11



09/19/90







K
21





*••
11
PH d, .C CO
O — •

,_j ;>
CJ S-j
•* V
t£
"

_;
!.£
analysis; and implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions, and site access







CJ
C
'5
1
_
tt
1
1



'£
t/l


t^-a

O rf]
M ^^ ^~"
^ o "o
**^ o e
u* ^^ §
0,13 "§
8^8-
restrictions such as fencing





















0 w °

E~" ^
^— '
T3
Jj k. j= £ £,
allHi-a
c ^2 d< g ^o

S r^ *o w w P
3 to " O ^*
S *B "g gf c gj
Ti ^ S aj S»
sj D. w k- S >
*^ Q OJ ^ U U9
U CX (« ^ ? CO
E-i ra on O x; BO
Collecting and treating leachate-contaminated
GW prior to its emergence into the Mangrove
Preserve, discharging treated GW onsite;
initiating landfill closure proceedings by the
State; and conducting hydrologic, water quality,
and treatability studies. Based on study results,
an alternative remedy may include constructing
a hydraulic barrier using negative pressure;
treating contaminated GW with air stripping,
adjusting pH level, and discharging the treated
effluent into onsite shallow subsurface trenches

1
1
tA

O
Z
* c
1g -a 3
|-*l|«.y|l

"c "^ oT "w *u *2 ^ .Cj
^*u S"""1 beE 1~l
CC^ ¥j V* G 3 r~\
l>irt.i-§i
7 ,
^ :s
nj c
" 3
k- ^ O W
R s; = 5 -s
.§• .> E ^ fc
§^ «1 S "
S EJ £ 5 & £

*

















or onsite SW; or a third alternate remedy may
include positive infiltration, biological treatment,





































Si
c
o
c
2
$
re
1
•3
c






















-•Si
^ u o
^ ^3 >





qj
2
.8
"H.
S
re
1
No further action with quarterly soil monitoring
and implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions

-a
1


o
z






u
*

U BO
2 Z -c
1/3 - 2
2 S jo
•88 1
^S £

*


oS
l/> ^
WV-.






























Facility
09/28/90


243

-------
1 "i i
g is q
l!i
E3o
OH



M
O.
3
C

n>
Si
>f c
a o
| |Q|
2 f §3
.S i I"8
'"5 55 so §
to rt
c
o
°5o
OJ
d
o
Os
°°,
S
00"
i&
5
O
1
.2
g
So
0
ta
y
1
S
g
u
u
Excavating buried waste and soil and

•a
e
I
C/5

1

'C
•8
"O
^T
C
OJ
E
1
1

g
1.
1
.c
tt
o

Tl-

G
8 tt
&i
N-^ >
£•
13
^bO
|fi
•* ™
""! %
6 ?
o a
'S S
g M
W QJ
CJ E^
*^ D-
1 S
.E •&






S,
bo
3
00
CO
"S
_u
"O
c
03
1
T3
55
consolidating them in the landfill area;
excavating and characterizing waste within
buried drums; consolidating debris in landfill or








43
.^
S
> T>
> a
W B
GW, and
contamin



g
c£
|
Q










60
C
•5
_3
"u
^c
organics

c
"O
c
3
£
• ~
U
C


O
CO,
O C?
^> og
*~* O
•
55
l_, QJ
a« u
ro oj
5 e >
> -S 2
< g,"
111















disposing of debris and drummed wastes offsite;
upgrading the existing landfill cover; partially
dewatering surface impoundments; excavating
contaminated sediment from beaver pond and
placing them in Oxbow Lake; covering the lake
and beaver pond sediment with geofabric cover
and infilling Oxbow Lake with clean fill;






>~,~°
= c
03 ra 1/3
U - -Z2
is c 3
~u 'C «J
&=3!

8" G" «
-a is •-
Pi
4> js e
D^ U (U



O
Os
\
CO
\
OS
O









c
a
_y
i
Cfl
.E
•a
l-s
.E i



13
c
E
1
w

















containing the dredge pond sediment;
restocking fish; monitoring of shallow GW and





































SW; and implementing institutional controls





































a
*w
T3
C
(B
wT
1
o
•5
§
1
i
T3
C
M
T3
J
00
C
1
~v
£





































access restrictions including fencing























§
in"
CO
Os
a
«A

i
Si
Si
a
a
1
jj
6?
«
"§
'S
£
01
•s
1
V]
•c
XI
 W \-f
"> —
a " ^ £
i a « -a 5
3 | 3 8 S
r* C M
lllsll
pi 3 ^ J3 *3 -a
§ 1 _ * .§ 1
G — • *t^ W "3 Q;
fl -a .E cr.S u-
u c > g ^>
a *•§! |5
E3 "^ « S
s n xi t> >-i 3
3«=^-a
100-year floodplain of Sixmile Creek to a depth
of 5 ft, followed by onsite disposal of waste
and debris within the landfill area; capping the
landfill with a clay and soil cover; installing a
passive landfill gas venting system; providing an
alternate water supply to residents affected by
the GW contaminant plume by extending a city
water main; implementing a plugging and
abandonment program for the affected wells;
GW monitoring; and implementing institutional
controls including GW use and deed
restrictions, and site access restrictions such as






8 .. "§
'5 a) 60 »
•5 1 8> S := e~
•ti ^ *-" " ;2 5
> .--. ra o - J2 .3
llsll-M
a 3 ^ o ™ J9 J3
c T! . " eo 2 u
IpI^-L
gilillll
1
_o
'c
, 3
^ S o "ra
— r tu — ^ ^
E .& E 2& E
c Sc ^ «
5 .S.3 g ^2



244

-------

































V
B
a
2
t/5


111
£ "5
4-, 13 ^
I'll
1 3 o
PH

M
0
a.
3
e
n
6



Components of
Selected Remedy
o
E
-~
$
£j
W5
CO
^
5



g
3
S
OH
QJ
£


£1
^ a a
5.H <
€e
Sec
W3 £? g
C/3 ("5
I
I
'
§
s
00
i/i
w

o
o
in
•8
w
*^r
1
«
=
°
3

Excavation and onsite solidification of


r*l
"§,
o
o
o
*0
CO

t T-
B
V
"s
M
wT
1
OJ
T3
1
J
b
's
QJ
S
2
>,
3
1

^-
1 1?
o CM
8 - 1 !!•§.
sis sl"S
t— i qj C -^ t3 •£ \
ocT o, P 2; *::: Soj — "5 uT2o\e
^•if-S^iSSf"
!?1i|i^i!
•* -S E e -H 8 ft" * "3 .£?
•gtaSgaBs^^C-^o
E-S-S-0 &£o «i £l-S
OJ
" 60 11
contaminated soil from the process area and
contaminated sediment from the ditches; onsi
disposal of treated soil and sediment; debris
recycling; onsite treatment of SW from
wastewater holding pond and pumping and
treatment of GW by chemical action and
filtration, followed by offsite discharge of
treated SW and GW to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW); biological
monitoring; installing flood controls; replacin
contaminated wetlands; and implementing sit
access restrictions including fencing


x— s
T3 C
^E
^-v o .E
a o-3
o o aj
v2- CS" **2>
M
."3
'0 ^
a »o
fii,
*> 3 C
* T3 IB
5 "S -s ""
03 « -s 'I P
•a .E 2 S^ 1
c 5 u a .3
™ I E ™ E
S c -a -^ S
5 8 S -8-5

&•
b =
ffl ^
" ftn
C8 —
« 60 0 W
u E 5" •£
OJ Ti o^ ^
11 1 H








CO
-o 9
s °
P
S J2
J3 dJ
•I
tp
J3 ™ —
«1>
T3 ? E




























s
CO
o. ^
•f g
rx 3
LO 4J
LO* Q
& ^S

CX —
g^
ra 3
•§«
QJ
5 c
0 S
u C
S^
S.-S
f 3
sl
E »
ll
U So
o
Pumping and onsite treatment of GW using
flocculation/precipitation as a pretreatment t<

•s
1C
'I
(A

O
~z



•S
?
> T3
> 2
CJ m
_ c
^ 'S
5 c
ra TO
^3 c
5 8
*X3*
1
PH
fa
3
3
Q
pi
U U
t/i in

•*t-


-g
o
S
in
M
^_
Bl
S S
w 2
W "
^§
I_J
^
x_> 3

remove metals, air stripping to remove VOCs,
and granular activated carbon adsorption to









w
c_^
V
c° S
•S 3
I 2
CJ
C ^
si
O flj
> i

1
G
QJ
•C
u
u
5
'6
1



fx
00
31
r- ' °S
CO rj
«« y
j?
"a ^
x, WM
E|g
V5 ¥ C
QJ U
S.8-*
•s-g-s
« 4) 3
•§61
™ . —
Cj1 Cj1 E5
U U *
ESI
3
remove semi-volatile organic compounds, if
necessary, followed by reinjecting the treated
water onsite; treating contaminated soil in-sit











fc «> c
J3 .E 18
O "2 uT
^ a ja
P|
QJ c/i -*—
•e 8 o.
!>> - S
x c M-
•o SR
c S? U
18 O PH
60
_C
bo *U
C >•
« CJ
•c 8
3 p=
U _
23 1
w C >.
w ca o
5 S 55







00
1
S
^
CO
in

g

using vacuum extraction, followed by carbon









U3

I
•^
c
ra
S
*o
]0
W5
S.


I1IL_I
CO
w
3
•o
e
ns








E
s
s
s
'g
CJ
t/3
jjf
^
14!
adsorption or fume incineration to destroy of























£•
0
S












g
Ul
gasses; managing carbon residuals from GW
and soil treatments through offsite disposal o






















o
?•
c>
1














regeneration; and monitoring soil and GW























i


245

-------
oil
i CJ
S 2S
QJ CX
K 3 u
IX



JS
§•
c
u

Components of
Selected Remedy

V
E
1
S2
1


g
3
!

.x^l
U  g
c
'So
V
8
o^
t— 1
,_,-
6f>



M
Jfl
J^
Cu
3
C
s
1
a
1
o
•s
Excavating contaminated soil and sediment wit



o
co"


^^
c
_- ?

O

based on the TSCA PCB spill
cleanup policy for unrestricted
sites. PCBs will be remediated
>,
PCB concentrations >10 mg/kg; solidifying an
stabilizing the soil and sediment, if a treatabili
study determines the effectiveness of using



1 |
11
£
p
•5 60
•c c
> -a
v TJ
CO .S
1|
2 g
g E?
o o
V
60
E
2
U
QJ
i-J O




_
§s
S o
& >-<

o _,
1— < ! — !
a level of 10 mg/kg with a
minimum excavation depth of
inches, and excavated areas wi

solidification for organics; placing treated soil
within the old salvage operational area and
covering the area with 1 ft thick soil cover;













Area
09/28/90











o
E
c
n
;§
1
8
JS

a
RJ
1
"o
•5
3
u
B
CJ
3
T3
8

























V
g
t/5
1

•a


c
g
Excavating contaminated soil and sediment fro



>,
I


^^
sedimen
c
1


1

^J-


4^
g
U5 -S
QJ C
D. °
^ ^
_y
•C . ,
ra (g
71 C QJ
w CQ 1*1.
— uti c
S f 0)
I B 3


^
o"
LO
(N
V>



1

the drum and pond areas followed by onsite
stabilization and solidification; evaluating
existing water wells for decommissioning; GW
monitoring. This ROD amends a 1987 ROD,



1 1
'o -3
c
o
3
5 2 S
•g 60-S
E °
11 »
.£ .c _£
^ w ^
8gl
—
rn .^
Groundwati
Contaminat








i
ry
60
includin
•|
°
rt
H
Industrial A





S
o
^"^



i S E &
I »| j
j.
which proposed treatment of soil and sedimeni
by incineration with disposal of the residual as
onsite






"rtl
"O QJ
c — •*
« t>0
.-. C —
ill
'CCO
S.!a-g
111
•*?
g
o 1
I f



O
o
O 4-J «
Ox Sa •£ O S
CN u C ** *y
" D. s "0
(^ & $ <&&


V _
The State has determined that
contaminant migration from th
landfill to GW must not exceed
State Prevention Action Limits
(PALs), which include benzene
0.067 ug/1 (PAL)
r"
Capping the landfill disposal area with a
soil/clay cover and installing a gas venting
system to remove off-gasses; covering the nortl
and south disposal areas with a soil cover;
offsite and onsite GW monitoring; monitoring
landfill gases; and implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions, and site
access restriction including fencing


1
"G
g.
o

^ w ?
o -5 2 ra
1 1 .c fc | 1
cu "3 *£ c i2
« ^ 3 O CO W
1 1 1 jf 8 = I
^ 1 a a g -g i
— i C ?s C 60 Tj "O
o o o i) c' y s
to S > ^5 o .S 8
1. 1
'0 .3
'S _ E
™j ET^ 3
Sfe *3 —
> ^ o g
g tG • & 1C ON ^
|-g o •§ CJ ^
^3 S3 o S



246

-------
° = 1
*f 3
S ss
f'Sl
«
1
o
o.
S
c
S
D
Components of
Selected Remedy

V
e
3
1
£J
M
1




E
 |
u5 (2
c
o
•&
tt
o
in
O w
tfS
v 35
CO i)
tf&
A cleanup action level of MBOCA
1,684 ug/kg was calculated based
Removing and treating standing water in the
lagoon; excavating contaminated soil, clay, and


"8
tc
1
V5
1

QJ
So
"O
J2 J-
«!
Is
.2 a
•sl
re ^
1 8


S

c
0)
li-
IS 5
-S g
^3

m



j? °
e ">•
I s
5 v)
on EPA guidance documentation.
The cleanup level corresponds
with the excess lifetime cancer-
lagoon sludge from a 100-ft by 75-ft area and
placing the material in an unexcavated portion
of the lagoon; treating the contaminated








0
3
X -P
"v £ S
g — o.
s?s
s'cjS
s H s
re w ^H
&0 CO &Q
u K 
.1

SU
ro
oo e
** C HH
% 'C -a
•S 3 ^
O rj *-
2 S « !!
g i = -^
•s S s ^
S 61^

in



i
contaminated media, and include
benzene 410-4,500 ug/kg. GW
cleanup levels are based on



proposed Best Available
Technology discharge standards
incinerator by precipitation; treating landfill
leachate in the GW treatment system;
excavating less VOC-contaminated soil and
sludge and disposing of these onsite in the
landfill; pumping and treatment of GW using




















- ^
e fc
= S
3 S
























M






1
in

^? -a
Qj T)
§• «
3 7~ ]
t/5 aj
u >
Si
ra "ra o
> CL ON
B 1 sr
ra •— < 3 ^ t-1
u S S § Z

L/)

247

-------
C/5
                  o °a

                  §2

                  £1
                  CO g
              §1§I"3
              •s 6 .^j&So
              w r T bb "P  *2
              cd W J2^ 4J >, *5
              "^ H "aX *C "^ "O
            iS-gs^ia^

            -*a2fi*as
            g 151 11

            W 8 H .E ~ «
  ^ _ u t/i c
  S .S2 co » cj
            "8
            
-------
1.
M
c S
(L) *Q^
I"3





Components of


k







£
nT ^ JS
| *La
3 K E
2 \ g
.sSi
r7\ *J r"
Vj c/3 bo
v3


cn
£J
S
8
Cleanup Goals




Selected Remedy
. C
fd
O
0 .-3
CO O
in &

- T3
Soil, sediment, debris
and GW contaminate
g
1
s
.a
Q
a
X

in

^^ o
•§ K"
1 «
5 «
2 £
3ll
8--§ 1
u fa u
13 cS
•a .3 8
U "t3 CL>
15 « f
111
III
|!|
,3 o S
IB 4,
60 60 >
c c fl
il*
J..fi g
E S M
1 S J
JS j- 2
!'§.§
|ia
2 "o T3
^ -S J
2 '1 u
S a ""
1 § g"
= w '5.
§ 1 S*
ls^
a; S Si
•S g 1


c-
(U
g

1


eo
.S -a "O
•a c e
_3 03 IB
•"isf
c3H. «
> g 8"
•s c S
•5l"&

=3
IS
TJ
B
^3 o
BJ O*.
I ^
1 I


/— \
IB
c
•Z
W
U m
-- - I
HI
;a-s
§'»>'§
f-t 2 03
4? u — r
^
3^">
ii.g
^ CO qj
O O IB
..& £
§£ $
l-S'fi
1/3 g =5
n m
landfill gas collection and combustioi
constructing a slurry wall; pumping ;
treatment of GW, followed by offsite






u
'S
metals including arse
and chromium



"S
c
°£
M





ug/1. Specific cleanup standards



ja
and implementing institutional contrc





















o
c
$
IB
£
C
U
1
•a
c
IB „
1*
II
ffl
•a
c
IB
vT
C
including land and GW use restrictio
access restrictions including fencing



















o
o
0 £
1
si
GW will be treated to meet
Federal MCLs or State standards.
iT.a
.a s
" S
^
•~i ,g
fll 1J
Upgrading and landfill capping at th)
contaminated GW at the site will rec

•8
tc

(A

o
T3
B _r-
Sediment, GW, SW, c
air contaminated witl
wT
•w
^
_QJ

f
ll

in

o o
o ° o
"5 "-"-
S fO CO
S co in
? W (A
SW will meet State SW quality
standards. Cleanup goals must
comply with AAQS, NPDES, and
RCRA standards

fa?
§ 3
v -a
a £ g
treatment by air stripping, with offsil
discharge; GW monitoring; and impli
institutional controls including GW, 1
and deed restrictions








VOCs including PCE,
vinyl chloride, TCE,
acetone, benzene,
dichloroethane, and

_
Q
a.
Q
fl£
II


/ — \
*w
g
1
^10












eo
^c
methylene chloride;
other organics includ



o\
CO
^
C .S2 0
~ __r Q co
'§ S v ff o?
8-0 to 3 N
II 12 *

in
249

-------
n -o n
O C ti
*a8
s.9s
9J &S
« co 28
E 0 O


ja

o
O,
3
c
u

J
Components of
Selected Remedy
u
E
3
1
U
1
?


 *ij (L) 3 ^
>  e S M a
U -S - «> g if "a
.« OJ ^ " O QJ
"B * »| ° - £ c~
™7.s S fe^^l^
is 1 s S-S « °-^ ro
^ S •" .r ° BO"? C g
1 E-E = 8| S^-|
_-ga | Sldfa |
5§OS->;"uyj=
c^ 8>J5 S'.So, E u
« "s
5 .&
** _o
«r 'S
E 3 _
*o 2 o ra
c ., o c
5 .SE s& E
3 «= ^ -
S 1 5 § S

in

S

§- ^ 0 O
o 1
O O tX •** "* "3
S £3 S t 2 ° e
. . C S ^" •— " c
^-" ^o G. y N i/> s
W (A S £ (/> (A -S
a E 7 >, I
•g 3 S T3 ^ S
uP . S C ju — (B
•s jj|« |™| § a1
e EJSrf S'i'S^""
I oS^ad^gs
y*j-pO_.3j >- n.
Sll-a^t^l-s
o-S O w^--i «
ac^^Hin^l13
l^ll^^l
els e-sH S.s ^
s^Ss^^Ni-5
is&aHji!
Pumping and treatment of GW using advanced
oxidation processes (e.g., ozone, hydrogen
peroxide, or ultraviolet light), and lime soda
softening as necessary, to precipitate inorganic
compounds, followed by disposal of the
precipitant sludge, polishing the effluent stream
with granulated activated carbon, and
discharging treated GW to an onsite infiltration
pond; and GW monitoring

"S
QJ
G
I
V*
O
2
•s 1
'% ™-
T5 g
§ «H
c .S w" a)
•= -a u TJ
E 3 S. 'C
2 TJ ..2
g-S g-S
U uj «J
> 3 C^
> o 5 c
O > £ '5
& 1
2 .y
'C *-y "E
«S | 0 |
U. ^ rt, Os E
p E ^ E S E
C « •-" ^C ON
e -a S -a cs '
EC tH G \ T3
5 S 5 s & H
t«5 J S J O CO

U1

250

-------
>
t- *u to
0 C S
*n8
" 2 ^
c • — S
£ &^
Sfl CO °r
Si O O
PH
tfi
0,
3
B
U
Components of
Selected Remedy

CJ
1
> "3
>
S
en
1



E
CJ
13
1
^
1

£ §
l|a'|
a c v _
2 S 3-2
ill!
C/5 pS
C
O
•R
(U
rt


§o
o
o
CN~ *o
vO O
•if Ln"
w w
Effluent discharge limitations for
treated GW were calculated from
•g
™ V,
§• a
= E
ST3
. C
>,JS
^S u
o 5
^§
1 §
— 00

c s
CO 73
.. CJ
•s 1
J2 .S
cj 3
:-l
5 8
5
"re s3
8.1
si
t- CU
QJ U
1 'E
s£


LO




t_)
£
w -S
QJ C
£i
State discharge statutes, and
specify weekly averages for metal
contaminants and monthly
venting system; pumping and treatment of GW
using filtration and either air stripping, carbon
adsorption, ion exchange or chemical treatment,






J£
cj" co
11
3 C
2 "S
bo C
c ta
^ U w"
3 P CJ
g  £ a
^
w
3
-a
£
£ 1=
•g^s
II




§"
«M
i °0
m °-
" 2 ™
^S"l
~ *O £3
SSS
averages for VOCs, as well as
MCLs. Chemical-specific goals
include benzene 8.5 Ibs/day, TCE
based on treatability studies; discharging treated
water onsite to SW; SW and GW monitoring;
and implementing institutional controls








T3

.a ~
'E -a
CJ c
J2 a
:luding a
romium,
.B-6


o
Os
^
CN
1











22 Ibs/day, toluene 17 mg/1 daily
concentration level, arsenic 0.045
including deed, land use, and GW use
restrictions; and site access restrictions
















VI











Ibs/day, chromium (total) 0.034
Ibs/day, and lead 0.0096 Ibs/day
including fencing






















o
i/)
o_
« 5 :?
« a £
fO CJ n
sal
w —
"ra re J3
&f|
0,0^
B§ S
CO _, _M
•§§1
«l!
ill
— — ( rt *•*
l^&
B O m
^ k- S
u£^
Pumping and treatment of GW using
precipitation/flocculation with air stripping and
carbon adsorption, and reinjection of treated


"S
1C
1
w
O



f
^ § e
«"Sl
"2 a M
-1.1
V3 C
'C ra r^
^ C 3C
41 o O
Q S >
E
*a
c
^3
2
Q
2
(U ,_
S S


in




5
o
*o"
i
'S'
2 °.
c/1 m
r«
^
^s
g 2
aj c/3
N v-x
1^
ff^
1 d
IB
water into the shallow aquifer; offsite treatment
and disposal of secondary waste streams






T3
C
re
..r ui
oj —
r j n3
W *-J
H u
« e
U T3
^ S
s «
S a
si
i s?
=
^
T3
C
3
^
s
re
j3




/— \
nM
29
O
"c3
3
C
C
re
S>
g>3
I3
^ o -a
803
HI
M
Hi
t/5 ^ ^
^ s a
S, S 2
3 S J£
including flocculation sludge and spent carbon;
capping the landfill area using a multi-layer
clay cap, and collection and flaring of landfill








•o
c
CO
CJ
'S
ro
ao
1.1
"7j i-
.S J


o
o
II












gases; monitoring GW; and implementing
institutional controls such as deed and GW use





























restrictions; and site access restrictive such as





























be
_e
'0
1





















251

-------
     u
Components of
Selected Remedy
   8 .9
.aSil
<3 55 B§
   to os
    I
               §1
               « S
               3,1
                   o w
                   8s
lities, and
water
Sanitary
rvice from
d
and
the
ted
that
l
l field,
to suppl
area of t
municipal
ire to bu
                                    ,.1SB
                                    salj
          60 r? r^ fa >-.«r---SC^JU"'*:1O5
          .sl llUl 8.1 ifi-fi fi s>fa'£ fil

1 c £ « » —s  »at>--
 ^tfe^^S  "II'SJ
>U ft g-j-'S =  g>" « 2 «
           III?*
           Si =lt
           i'ili"
           6 =5 5 S -S
            illlll
            I  is
dences within the affected aa; closin
abandoning all existing private wells withi
affec ea that draw from the contami
ted
resi
 ! w -^
  13 w
  s K £•
  s ™ a
  g.a s
  •n •= i-
  °- eg a
   gg
  II £
  '8J! s
  •^ CC IM
  ^. w re
  o iu -a
  M-S a
  lei
  a  re
               II
          _ !Q  23
           c 'E  S | £•

          SI  111
§  £
                               252

-------
O

o.
3
     o
     o
     2  S
     2 S c
I?


H
O (A
8
o

11'
O 35 '
o* iJ
co cL
                          8
8 g
"
     «re
     '§.
      sgl
                              111
                              1 §
              8
     2 rt
              CSI

              ^   S
                         >-



                         il
                         cj qj

                         c E
                         £ in
                                         CO
                            253

-------
S
b
«


to
.a
0

1
I
£
Components of

Selected Remedy
              '•o" £ c?  ^2
                                               R
                                               § g
                                                            -p'u 0,
                                                                        c
                                                                        _e


                                                                        §
                                                                        •a
                                                                        S
                                                                        &
              <§.- fe"§ 111.
              •S T3 DO .S 8. 5 n 1" 18 T3 JJ

              il-iS=ilS,§^f S |
              s^ E s-a.s-e^-a^  •
                     J£
                     ra
               . ft-S'  5S>S   o-o  §=5
                J25   2
              a-l s§ 2 s^
               o JS  o
               CD.  O

               I E  &
               S «  M
                   §   2



                                                       •S   o



1
I
                                         O
                                                   C 60
                                         llillllll
                                         "ra    , _ ,
                                         C
                                         3
                                         -2 ig
     c
     3

     S    o  "n

     01 -  ?•  -S
     -> E  >  ^
     tj "O  r"   '
                                         5^   £^3
                                       254

-------
Components of

Selted Remedy
Si
O °9

§2
0~ <9
 •
          •-
  !^>!UIM
         £"S
        HI



       "§"
          -
 CO os ^M .1?^ «i5 •"" ?• oj

 fiilil&ff.
S
a, -a .
liiliJIlt!
B.MD,OMiaScw2
1
O
s
o
"S
     60
     c
     •c
     3
s   1
06
    E 2
    v 5 -n

    611

               §
               8
                    o
                    o
                    o
                       !!!!?
Soil, sediment, debris,
1
•o
c
ra
O
contaminated with
VOCs including
•a
c
ro
w"
^
w"
K
u
i
1
xylenes; other organics
•§
ra
^c
'x
_o
^
.S
•a
3
"3
^C
pesticides such as DDT;
metals including
•a
c
«
e
3
u
j:
u
_u~
ra
1-1
CJ
j:
4-1
O
T3
B
CO
S
_«J
inorganics
                    B
                    
-------
  §0 _
  O S?
003
in o -s
       81
       2-i
       IS
     EH «ss i a-
     Sills!£
 •s s
Q.

l^g
a, K 5
  S S S3 S c £?
w X 3  1 g a
•S in -2 *J S J-g
O _ g cu  co  o^
    a,   d. Q > cu  o
                      w
                                  o
                                  t>
                                                    3C ^=i
                                                    5S
                                                  CO
                                             .§ S g 'g »
                                             I 2 o S 3
                                             •* • • " EC-a
                                             o S «
                                             j?l
                                                 e -a 8
                                                 I S S
                                                 is3!
                                                  'S. S
                                             g13

                                             1 SI'i2
                                             a   £.* e
                                                  «
                                             I  ill
                                             18 •§
                                             <*>3
                                           tf a 8
  - s a s
•5.S- g, g 5
                                             e.2
                                             B "
                                                 o
                                               a .s
     e-
     o
                                       1C

                                       I
                                        £?

                                       "^
                                        S?
                                       'S:
                                                  $ CO
          S   e
          ?   s
                          256

-------
O
Q.
3


I
u
     r 8
     tp x;
     c S

     II
                           o
                           II
                           |3a
                           5 ft,
                           •g a1
                           S=5
                           C 3
                             «
                            § .a
                            ^ §
                            ap
2
.52

J
                                I
                o
                                          "8
                                          tc
                                           o
               1
               TO
               ^C


               If
               81
               S 2
               5-6
                                          s
                                          £
I
ra
B
E
                           257

-------
i'SS
S\
   U
Components of

Selected Remedy
        !U

        3
        D.
        to
        O
        IU

        IS
         a
         !0



         I
No furth
         a
         ex
         aj


         o
          -
         .23
                      §
                      CO Q.
                           '
                           .


                                            i
                        | "S^^a^g agfiSalt
                        S'2''^'-o§8SSE
                               '^•zsaegssBssB
                                toowojcoOoOcooc

                           .503

                           T3 ... o
                        t/3 o
                           > ±i 0
                              V BO

                              60 .C

                              S C

                              o .2
                  &
            s
            8 8-
                              .


                     to  £ iS   — CTCCO  vO   «
                     r-H  D 5   WUtOb  O   •-'
                                258

-------











e
S
a


C "a a
C !1 5
1
D.
p
1
a
Components of
Selected Remedy
1
"5
S
c/l
g
sat/Problem
X
£
£§
|o|
IJJ
I
S
£
•* S   o -
S S £•  0.3
"> IB c  ?r s

         g   _ c  — " |^§
-------
  u
o-S
i!
e *
  •a
                                                                          •a I '& I
         3=5
•RT>
         CS
           .-a -a
            8 J
           ^-^
          •> «     "g   o ~
          II   s.t-g
          s v—'   CO ^^ CO
                               S
                                                                 "8
                                                                 tn
                                                                 I
                                                                      be
                                                                    s.s
                                                                    "5 c 
         sg   i^
             fc H
                LH   O\    (A
                Ho"
                                                        _c
                                                        "5
                                                        S
                                                         c
                                                         Eg   «3
                                                         02   £S
                                         260

-------
  J8
  §
  O
  a
  3

  I
  G
Components of
Selected Remedy
.
w pj
 o
 'R
 S
            w
            OS
             1 s -a  S ,3
                  °"
               .
               -
                 -a
*g





                     il
                     '
      !J!E
       1 "S  ~
       --x35  ^H
      o

      'I
      £^
      I 1
      1 E.y
      - 2 *-
      13 o %
      t/iow
     UH
                  o
                          IN
                                —
                               O ^
                               0 3
                               «
o I "
s ^^ffl
                                 °1 g
fo
to
liq
te
tm
ed o
vati
in
it
nsta
includes inlling
ells, followed by offsi
liquids and onsite tre
g drumm
on; exca
soil in o
mpora
cti
quids; excava
offsite destructio
ng contaminated
s-gt
^|Ig&
 "iliii
MSiSS
Hlill
«s g § § I
"3.13 s-a S2
•g 8 ^ | -g ^
n g S o S c
aq
liq
co
dis
the
sou
cap.
inte
onsi
      **>   e
      •R  |

      lla^a?
      oo" 3 "» —r w '3
      l^3i § S^T
      u 1.5 S S 9 8 g .5 -3 Ja
      ^ n r«a § u 8. S 6. -2 E 'S
      SlilllllJIl
      CM
      5  *
      fe  1   I
      1  la  §
      K  £K  S
                        261

-------
U

o.
3
C
0
S3 E
e «J
u a;
ii
ii
u#
                         jy

                         S

                         &
                         eg


                         1
                 A
                         CO
                         I
                         o



                         I
                         a
                         -
                         •S -
                         1
      o >
      S-8
                          J3

                           S
            -a
      •r   "S -C
      E T3 ^ U
      •S a| S

      ^.li»

      ll-ll

      -i&'9
      o
      c/i
            SB .2
            cx -a
                         o
            1
                         !l
                         D. Z
                                   s  1
                               t,
                                       ClH



                                    g  2
                              262

-------
                                       si
                                   II 111
 £

  •c bo
  •- c

.« ^ TJ
 vr.a-e
 sr « « •
$
   .
i2 '0
    c 5
 l§l|9
3.2 p .a I *
 •a E-I -a u M

  3
  2



  II
aisi  II
                                  o
                                  O
IE    I  §
£<§g  I  I
                       263

-------
ss
CJ
  o
   o
   o.
  ss e
  c w
  u c£
  ll
   •a
                o
                o
                o
i  si
1
§ 5
II
3 2
**
e .a
.°
CO ffJ
ll
a 1
1 s
•Sg
2 5
"§£
2 2
CA C
K:§
,Q «1
CQ
> y)
sl
0-5
ia
^' g
2.2
^3
w fO
t-i en
£^
^ s
pecific goa
•cinogenic
Chemical-s
include cai
3
1
o
¥
<*•§
W CQ
l!
CO g
2 0
. M
b& o
e^
Is
ti
O j«
^ 5
Jl
f 8.
pentachlor
Chemical-s
ol
rt -a
•g-o
la
""S1
U
^a
.S o
"cj 'O
ca u
0 S
•S3
il
1
a
o
o
o
CO
V
•a
s
1
W
1
CO
.0
.a
•a
E
E
1
^
c
&
-«1
C 2
&^
o •&
O CO
5^
99% remoi
contaminai
O
&
I
f
1
U
m .
01 C?
IS
•;*
•S 3
1«
JK
s /->
&d
|g
l^
13 3
^
3 0
a1"
I'S
J2 i
U
-•g
li
-§
^s
"> ^C?
w 3 u
P o S
r- t/> ^-'
         WJ 4~l "Q fl
         •a co 3 .y
         — -S "3 fl
         M e.l S,

         g i " •*
         .1 8'
         flj ?
         w U


         1
!.§•§
         g g,
         ro '5
         nS -i
                                   264

-------
                    8  g
                    o  g

                    52  c
I
WS



I
    §
                                   265

-------
  u
is e
£2

ll
                  o
                  o
                  o
in
V)
                                                     •ill
                                                              e 5 S x "t? ra 01
                                                              E 1) g &*>   £
                                                              oj 5-3 o c .52 5 t-
                                                              L. U y c C O to
                    o
                    o
                    o
         o " a S   tC   o


         S^l   Ei-il
         co -—' S K   r-i ao>—'
Soil, sediment, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes; other organics
•o
c
ro
M
C*
S
•a
_3
T3
_e
eo
_c
^
_3
13
_c
w
2
01
arsenic, chromium, and
•o
M
(U
                   U o

                   53 2
                     e

                    E
                                           266

-------
£•« S3
O C w
£ ™ rg
els
CU d< ^
in co «
a o o
J/
li
£
C

C
n
(!_
L







V
3
£
1 -at
Decision Sumi
Components
Selected Rem
•8
1
orf cu
e
S •§
^ ^*
t^ cu
S
—
IS
8
IX
i>
CO
Ei
J3
t~




•& §
I^'l
2C§1
a |s"S
33 ^ .1 1
w rt
c
.2
00
Si

w 2
^•f S
0 S 0
t» 5 w



OJ
3
1
"H.
a,
RJ
o

^
o
1
c
ii
•s-0
'? §
££
(U W
p •—
QJ P
<- QJ
C w
o rt
'S e
CO O
*J g"
^S
5 "5
•II


_CJ
2
u
ll
Z co






u
c
o
Z
u

*-
b.I8
iHi
i§i§
£566


t^s









































Contaminated
Aquifer
09/28/90



    g
      O
      -5
            o
            o
            o
            v»
"8
tn
 o


            c
         S    .
         00 C ^
 CM    'c « y
as    £ s (2
T3  C
                      .     u
                     §     ^2
                                 2»
                                 * S
                                 S-a
                                 nj  ro
                                 S  S


                                 Ula
                                 e  w  c
   i/)
   (N
                                 '3
                                  -
Ca
                                 
-------
 o
 O,
•53
re
al
te
ate/
atu
e
Si
R
         £
         o

•a
S
1
           « '

           &
                            t-
                            s
                        i-g  o-
                                o
                                  U5   (Q
                                  '3   Ji
                                     -
                             ii!
                               y.s a
by
mus C
yst
GW
zatio the wa
rry, owed
wat Calm
nent inage
rry; treating
n of
, follo
te to
t drai
; t
                                   I-g
                                   JS g
                                   2 5
                                   .§«
                                   ... 60
                                   ^ c
                                   u -c
                                   K 2
                                   u-a
                                   IE
                                   —-" "^
                                     c
                                     cd
Ca
prior to discharge
of dewatering we
treated discharge
Continued acid neutraliza
the dewatered West Qua
discharge of the treated
construction of a perman
the dewatered West Qua
                            1
                             O
                              flff 1411
                              'S I ja I S 1 a
                              is = 3 S -3 a S
                            £S«£-g£-£o
                            1/3 S-E e M^-a-S
                            "§|.§ J9".s|'|3
                            s i Sil-i-s o I
                            5 8 o-S-.s g.s 5

|
!!<
                             268



-------

s <£
CO O
•I

1
       o
       o
       O u
       *w TO «3 '^ t_i

       Sllll
I s
5 u
          2
M





"§£


P =
C &

o <
S  £
              269

-------
  O
  D.
  3
  u
£3 E
1
        5J&I
         o
S|   "He?
00 **   " •-
                                 I
                               ll
                                      c
                                      b
                                 s<
                                  §   5
                                                        8
                                               o> 5.
  o
  o
  -S
  r-i 03
  go
                                                        &
                                                             ^. e c
                                                              a 2 %
                                                              c: 
                                                -• c _
                                                T3 '£3 d- J^
                                                § 1 8 | § I

                                                I u S ™ 1
                                                (XI'M £ S „
                                                C C   ^ "
                                                •a o
                                                        o /-^   o .S
                                                        10 ™   o\ -a
                                                         e-
                                                         S"§1
                                                         E 
-------
u
s
                    _

                111 I
       O

       O ,-^

       O r=
o
o
o
             H  ^
                                                e s ji B s
                                            8 S>
                  1
                  "
                                                  g e    ••       a
                                                  i CO 5 tin <   O   r-1
                                    271

-------
Dat
it

ta
Si

R
           Si
         E

         "B.
                       §80
                       '*£«
                      ilsB s
                       0  ^ ca
                       CO « 01 TS
                  c.gppl
                  •s-s Site S.y-6
11 IE.1!|
> u.S m - « e-l
al'S^ will
lfiv*s>Scio.i"
ON D- u o* DJ w ra .5
U-i
1
             B »
             — .S -a
             - CO C. C   OJ
            s B c w   .a
            QJ O C    !«
            S .1 S. ff e g

            •i'^ttg
            l-i (3 —- M tT U
            "° « 'a S S _

            •S § -a ^ 1
            c o 4-1 rt   co
            S 2 c „. c 53
            C P IP 60 Q g


            Ill'ifl


            iSSIll!
                  Illitii
                  i^^-o i^-g
                  >< n  G 0 (U C
O
                     w
                     a
I'SS'S
lltfrf
.° c°5 S S
            c > c •=> e
            "S l-ol-o
            I *jj S 1 S

            llplll
            llllll!
     ,-a
7, >-


II
S K
    o
8 '«  °
«


 |i
£ 5 U2
      .
    0  rl
as
C *J
oj o
•p a.
1)  IN

•S  5;
fi  o
                                •
                                "oi vis S « "u .S
                                        o
                                        Ov
                    272

-------
 §•'
I
      £ g-S'S 1 8.S.S
      S •§ s | £ | .8 S
I1
      •g
      tc
      o
     l-slll
          .
       ,3 P "S 2 'E
     ^ o 'H'S "S «
     O > a .S a S
'S .S
> T3
                      BO CO .t


                     I-§ E
  '2 '0 -o
     c

     .5
     CL,
     |8  3

     £g  S
     IS  3
8
c ^
'S «
1 s
I?
>> ™
¥> S
g J


&
TJ
S
1
1




g
&
?j
o






•a
c
(S
                               273

-------
eg
 .1
      o
                       "8
                       o
     •S S
     g^
a. 3 .H

&I
     S gj^§
    „ "°

  _, CJ ^3



s3lS|
 S -'C w5,_,

l^d =ru
S2 bbS O b»2
co 3 *—•' «-< 3 ^-^
                          •8
      s a^
      I 'i w VM .


.siilt!
ra CL>
                                *"
                       |S||1.

                       S^l 8«

      t:  u « u
      o w| fc"S
      C S?^3 § „
      ..GcjSc   ». ™ w - — — N.
      a '3 .ti '3 aj   o !-• * o co -c 53 t>o


      ll?!!   HiUli!
                       w U Ol
                       c -a i.
      o
                       •8
                       IB
                        O
        W u
        "" J=
        U -S  «
        O« n  "S
       ~ = -2 -2
            2  -a
      S "°
      ?2 co
      5^ c 12  "5 "0 ^ E

      IllBI'Ill
                              g
                                 "S
                                 CO
                                            8.1

                                            Sg
                        c"c£-S'S-So-ii««

                        illg-sJiffigli
                        I^II^lliliSs
                        6.s£3ss.§^g,sS?
                               £§1318121
                                « 2 ^


                                •s al-SS
                                13 QJ W "S *5

                                III 2-|
                                    •s* I
                                    « c E


                                    -s-e§
                                    5. D-d
                                    B M *O
                                    3 -a G
                                    a. co co
                                        o
                              S -a
                              co 3
                              c 73

                              E-S
                                 T3
                                 '0 a,


                                 l§
                                      I
                         274

-------
"5 "g a

n
c S «
g -ES





,-
0
o
o,
3
C
S
0





Components of
Selected Remedy


s
u


Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
o
°eo
OJ
Pfi
"8
2 "8 « 5 | 2

SS b oj T3 TH
— c >2 s 8 4j
i 1 Q 1 1 ^
-c §0 2i^ 8
CJ £j CS H U CX
Consolidating sludge adjacent to the basins with
sludge in the basins and containing the sludge
and any excavated contaminated soil with a
vegetative soil cover; hydraulically containing
GW with a slurry wall or sheet pilings
constructed around the perimeter of basin area;
pumping GW to maintain an inward hydraulic
gradient across the slurry wall; treating GW
onsite, either at the CERCLA Wastewater
Treatment System or at a separate onsite
treatment facility to remove organic and
inorganic contaminants; and GW monitoring


r-l
"R
§ ^
If
O "^

5 ~S -o
u -S e*> 52 - S
•a -| S E .a —
f-aPi1
bO CQ .S •" c"
•a c sft oo b
2 •— « CJ c 3
"« § "S 'S "3 *S
^ C (X) w "o fc-
O O 1— i QJ c- J2
WUOCL.SU
O
U
c -
18 1"
p J g
s — — 5s
>> g 12 o
•* S OJ  e 3
8f |-s
^•g S3 »
« c o ^
mi
8
c ^
2*— co £7*
c M S
!§ 1 o
>> S "2 S?
-* g !U O
•S 8 1 "8 ^ -S
VO PH <, tin O IN


CO

275

-------
.!
     £
     HI
     •s
     § S II |
     •2 BO K, «. a
        3
        i

     •S
     I -s 1 1 -s a"
      i
    g sjg
    tl "tfl O
     o

     83
        3 c
     Iiill
     o c o ^ E
       « -a 3 o
       Sf S3 1 i
       O 6..S u
o
1/3
      1  II
                          t>0

                         o .5 £ J3 _
                       llfffl

                       llsi^l
                       .E fc O .3 _>..«
                             §1
  8.1 o u;


  => « •'S e
  ^ C L4 *^
  I/) B  ^

  A a ^ 2
                            8
                         2

                         E
                       ll
•S .1 1 1
nil
                                   •§


                                 o
                                 Ov




                                 1
                                 O
                         276

-------
         _
W
Components of
Selected Redy
         ,LJ

         I
                      o
                      o

c c =5 E  -
i> '~ 3 -5 "^
Ifl8.3
i*a-§£
                  i
                    s§  s
                    o« |5   x
                    'E "   ^
              K 2
          o   ^3
                                                                o
                                                                CO
                                                 -
                                                of

l
<20 mg/kg), followed by offsite disposal
(contingent on EPA approval) of the removed
arsenic-contaminated soil, and revegetation; SW
monitoring; and implementing institutional
controls including land and access restrictions
                                               "8
                                               1C
                                               1

.-§

|

1


— 1
'5 !2
t)5 a



•v
U
                                          §
                                          ^
                                          CO
                                             a
                                       277

-------
t- "^3 ^
p c tS
!> CO o

e 2 .-
B '5.3
I30




oa
D.
3
B
S
QJ
u






•*
^ X
°^
ss e
S c v> CJ S
jalgS-
53 1 ° S>
~ Q W bfc 3
_ r i ^i
D- — W 3 rj
E= s "> S
11 111
llJBS
B
10 a ..
§>! 1°
2 0 'S
3 O en
a £-5 1
•B _ § "
gleg
0 S .., u
5 - ? 13
S "3 u c
^ «• .. s
"S-rfSl s
w E 10 " O
c 3 > *a 'a
S 3 > tn u
g B° S -S fa
g 'S.v2 g1 §
CH dj ^ .—
" 'fi 3 c i>
l.^2M
fflftfl
•&.S S .E -a
EO 43 3
3 "3 « •§ "3
*-* X •-- C r"
O.  H
1 I 60
a s,.s
a •& §
s Jri
i ^&
"7^ .S C ^
&< s « ^
< U < S i2

0^












































o
o^
^
M
s^
o


§
O 4-1 2
-. c ^ . 	 .
ti S *P ° Q1
ST M 'P in" ^
O^ CU C r-4 C4J
I-H" rv P CO O
V» 0? ? W fci
-rt ^-i
(U 5 O
3 r — i
•O elj « ^
"P hrt *S J£3 ^
•Nil ^
•a i c"3 u "
§ a 1 c'S 2
bo v ui aj
a10 c £ 83
•3 *-i •— > 3 *C
1 § fill b
S « 'a * ^ g
"o 5 .S ^- = E ve
La * g g'S 8»
^ 8 8 H-&S o
§j S B E -g E 2
8* i 3 2 B '="
< S 2 D. i! 3 «
Consolidating soil and asbestos ores within the
tailing pile; grading and revegetating tailing
pile; diverting SW away from the tailing pile;
improving an existing sediment trapping dam by
constructing a concrete spillway; dismanding
the mill building; paving the mill access road;
and implementing engineering controls,
institutional controls including deed restrictions,
and site access restrictions including fencing
T3
(U
C3
I
on
O
z
f
">
?•
a
CO
B
1
2
c S
o 2
U (n
:> i!
& -g
C/3 (0
S c°|
8 =a „
•* S =
3 S c -a
« < i o S
SS, 5 ss -S* °^ -r
00 ^^ O j^ \ ti*
a «r s w a
JO C ^ -o \ T3
OS « c Os C
OS < co o CM
*-}
OO ^— N
_. w c ^
§ E ^ £ g
£ 8 H S ^
SJ s. S ^ S.
 »-i u
£13 n rt -S
= 'c 2 V|»R
^ nlT. O "cO S
^ ^ 0 « o ^
s i-i M bo
« G S 
2 |
10 •-
U '0
m
8 E _
B •-- o "H
« . .2 0s E
^S i | s
a --^ -i S \ ^
£ a £ < o S
278

-------




































1
CO
ffi
35




o « 1
£ *<§
c.3s
 OH jTi
fao
J2
§M
O
o.
3
C
CO
OJ
U
u^ >-
°-s
a E
C QJ
| ^
S *a
11
3j
u
E
3
"o
>
a
w
CO
5
E
V
S
2
ex
JB
S
^ §
|a'|
f il
^ CO OJ
2 c c
55 SP S
cyj pj
e
_o
*5o
I
o

R
                             §
                             v£>
 si
                                          »ft
                                          s Jn
      :s § 2

.» .. — K .73 u •>
.afal.gsli


"512111 a
  c o -3 ^ *n S ra
x "2  -
U C bo
<-i 3

S *'
 .S -6 g
  o

 15-a
, T3 ui ^ "S


 !l'li
r c S S .S

: | K "I S

 I | I 'S
^ U3 tl _._„ O




 M S .2 ™

 C M"° >"
 O C 0) >
 •a 'a .a w


 "il^
  o " sa
W O
           CO
           c

           E
                       •a  ^3 w

                       S ^ | 3



                       E^l o


                       S I 1 ^ I



                       Hill
                       Qj c cj o .£
                       ^ 8 '2 =6 •§



                       tO [/) O CO .£
                             §
                      279

-------
1
o
o,
Ctf
      1

       'S .


       3 .S o
      '0
      s
c
«

5-
boe

•S"S

8 j
      16  1
                         § 8 s


                         ">" rn" 5j '
                         CS 00 li
                                 SUB
              S&8"
                          lli
                         o
1

fc
'2 13
                              1
                             < 2
                      a -a v v * > c a a
                      I a-S-S-So^mSS
                                                at'
                             1
                                          o
                                             H D~ "ffl

                                             aj  s
                               280

-------
 -S3
 §
 O
 a,
 3
 C

 u
&T3
I!
      i
      o
      1.S
       =
      u >
                         —
BlP'i
* 1-^1
is ca « H ^
llgll
      60
      C

      OT
1|
« C
.5 5
J< S
                           I
       i
                          281

-------














1
B
c7
j
13
1
ti
c -o a
?i«
S "cL J3J

£



J2
8
o
n.
°


Components of
Selected Remedy
* |
8 J
fe «





















V)
$
QJ
!
(i
•^

aj
C
J3
P


\ c
S .2
jT j[ a '§
r? QJ
2 X 3 5
S g 1*8
M S C C
^ ft 60 g
to oj
c
o
"So
S

i/C C! s-< \ o f*>
£ flf o S
«• = 0 co~ n

s >& s «i y
, C ™ T3
•S °~ "8 S"B §-S
a ~% ii .S t! " 'a '? »?
2?5
U »•§ «"S »«? ll"
Sj3«aK.SSl?EE
SS^«g aa S SJ2T3.2
S-S-c = ?'3v? -^SSE
S3!u"S-§2'SSl^g
^ M"»J^ o uTS a.(8.e
-^"illsScI^^
slSlggg^g-ag1
5'8>I>|§8-87'0S.IS
Ii;lliisli1
QJ 60 T3
Excavation and onsite incineration of soil;
dismantling of contaminated portions of
buildings and, if necessary, repairing those
buildings where the removal activities may
affect their structural integrity; onsite
incineration of contaminated concrete building
structures or offsite disposal at a RCRA Subtitl
C-permitted hazardous waste facility, dependin
on volume; analysis of ash from the incinerate
materials prior to onsite disposal if ash meets
cleanup goals or offsite disposal if ash remains
contaminated; and GW monitoring
M U S
^ e S 3
>>,-^ O 0 «
... r= vo c y
| 8 *- S g
ON ^-' r-i *— ' «
«
2 £
PM
ll'Sli
ISl'-s
e SR 60
"° -S u -a C
C e .-- '"^
« cc C 'u 'S
*-J 03 "C 3
1 o E? Si
t/5 u o O..S
_£-
«J QJ 'G
S 2 £
o fe
TO *n ,— i
S So
j*i a, 'a o
(n C3 CJ\
^ ^2 ^

S S O O Os 1/1
H, > BH (i, O rH


0

*• !$
9. o e
| g _ | | §
llf §ll|
o B, g mn><2
«» S 5 vi ii 8 E
13 M — .
l = g
S 4J cij
•" T3 M
a! Q
* S 73
lii
•o ™ \
C H IX>
2 Q 3
« K in
°- U
c 2 H
S-S _-
°2~bO^
^ c = »
5 0 in E

Pumping and onsite treatment of GW using air
stripping to remove VOCs; discharging the
treated water onsite to infiltration trenches,
including one trench located upgradient to
facilitate flushing of secondary contaminant
sources; confirmation soil sampling;
investigating deep aquifer contamination for
possible remediation; and implementing
institutional controls
"S
S
U
S.
V5
1
€
5 w"
"S ^
a «u
c .5 n
11°
S U T3
c c d
8 « "
•a. Q W~
> O U
O > H
.y
C/l
'So &•
3 -
< u
yl >^r 03
•?£ ^ s
a S 2 ^
„ S S (M
C C T3 V. ,j
O V C ON to
u, U b o ^H


o
'""'
282

-------
>
t3 T3 a
o c g
> CO O
sis
QJ Cl* «


—
0,
7
c
CO
D








of
a E
S c<
!l
li>
u3






tu
E
3
> "3
* >
1 CU
1


2
1
K
^

> S
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Dat(
Remedial Actk
E
.O
'So
OJ
rt



n
10"
CO
vO
t»

E
rial with concentratio
CU
to
3
.
•£
«J
ca

ex
e
•a
CU
c
'g
•a
B
ft
1
~n
BO
E
•a
to
."9

c!




**i
u

g
ID
—
.2
QJ
CO
1
1
"g
CO
1
E
i»
Silver Mountail


0


S



8 C
£i
E u-.
O O
"O "cu
S g
S3.S
e.*
£'?
66 g
e g
O 0
O _
tN ra
A T3
.a S
C-
"S
O CO
•a c
c -s
« g;
BO CO
.S U
"1 J3
^ CO
BO-g
>> ffi
J=> CO
15 e
Is
1. "2
ex S
SB
js 8
•si
_ 00
c
cu -r
*§
•5 s
1 8



ex
_ E
1-i
TO
= c
o .E
^ E
,0
'c
u
^^
5 I3
"§1
ca u
d c
's '«
2 "3
§1

1
tu"
B
S












60
-*
•Jb
S
A
tu
3
1
Ui
O
b


ca
x;
'?
>
V)
CO
•c
cu
1
•g
nd consolidat
ca

ex
r^
•S





^2
"C
s
CO


ly occurring)
S
3
CO
£,
•s
5-Acre Abando





9
c« S

w ^y
lie
III

5
o
^^^
— 0) OJ
111
P " T3
Jll «
5^ co gJ
gl^
•^ x
•8=3 §
1 £ =
£85
cu
-a " tu
c » E
to 5;
., « CO
JJ ex
e ex BO
a D -S
2 w ~*
E to 2
^.s
il^
c ex ca
1 &•*
2 S
to c 3
lit
til
H:E g
S ra «
BO >
X c ?
co .S —
""be
^ 1 -S
0 S E
w t- CO










er inorganics
g cyanide
!i
"9 Ti
C c
co .E

Mine Dump
03/27/90










CA
§
ng detects concentrat
g standards set for
154 ug/1 (based on a
monitori
exceedin
cyanide
5
O
^r 'w
-£- B
ex §
ex -a
S 3
W C
LH "C «
a B §
CO •- •-
5 60 0
ill
.S tu c
alternate an
; and implem
:luding deed
g B? £
CO E —

£ 2 "1
= 'S *3
^3 o S
S E 8














"to
E
E
tc










J_l
\O « E -rt
^*^ 5fl 2 ^3
o "C ^ 2
"S i, D. 60
Slli
1 §^-§
•?T °fi
B2=o
|§^s
I'Sl 2
•O tfl
™ S «•-
S-s-s
l^ll








































ex
S
QJ
JT
-S
s
cu
•5
0
So
•8
CU
•S
p
U_i






































>o~
K
o"



al contaminant goals
Individui
U— 1
O
c
o


€
s
"o
CA
OJ
"w
C
O
1
s.
•a
c
CO
c
o

1
S
X
w



«*)
•^
o

8
J8


CA
•a
1
lo
13
3
tyi

Teledyne Wah


o






E
ex
E
'£
.S
.—
Ic
£
"S
ta
1
CA
O
E
K
1




ra
.E
i
VI
^
aj
1
o
1-
XJ
CJ
_o

"o
>4_l
oT
tX)
*o
3
"u3





cu
bo
T3
3
S


•S
'?
"S
CO
E
2
E
O
CJ

X
1
<2
60
B
CO
U







^^
s
I 1
i s

T3
action; the selected
will attain Federal an
lARs
3 x3
cu In tu
£ E to
2i i! «







E
T3
C
_co
Oj
^
CO
r2
"5
cA
T3
OJ
w
S.










;; and metals
g chromium,
d zirconium;
ioactive
S E E -0
•g ^ CO g
CO 3 -rT ^H
sill
^J
E
(TWCA), OR
Active Metal
Production Pla






































t/a
lo
tu
to

12/28/89





283

-------
                               SECTION IV

                 RECORDS OF DECISION SUMMARY TABLE

                               FY 1982-1989
The FY 1982-1989 Record of Decision Summary Table provides an overview of site
problems, selected remedies, cleanup criteria and estimated costs provided in the
RODs signed between  FY  1982-1989.   The table  is  presented by  Region,  in
alphabetical order according to the site name.

-------
       I O  v> <—> f  V) •
o

o >
ai
§  H
                  2 5.
               s •§
        a S
        Sbti u
        I »s

        SI I
           o
               ftf
            ^
            'I 60
              2 §
             'e-s
               
S 8'5^
if   ;
M * B'S
•o -p •- .9
S s S ^
                      •8
                      08
                              I
                              CO
                                 g«
                                 r-i
                                    III
                                    g 1C O
                                    C - "" -
                                    jj ^ =3 f 'Z
                                     'S S B-g
11111 °
« « u 1 c E
« B ^2 * O S
Ss ^-s'g b
§ § _a « g c
"| e^ til
                                    1
                                       O t/1
Pll
8P-2
                                       TD "ca
                                       C 2
                                       10
                                 =3 •£ 3 "° I
                                 v 'C *C C £
                                 oS f a, S S
          .S

          I
          Il
                                        §-g
     ill
     o S a
     U. £ UH
                      287

-------
S
  r-.   °
  s   8.1
  'ass
 I
 s
«£.§
T3 TJ gf
sl °
o

d
 60


'I
o
in
to
               * o
               to~ "I
                    1   i»S
                                                         !
                                                         a
                                                         c
                                                         o
                                                         •55
y_i

I
                    &f eo

                    yi
                    •o ^
                                         a  ^   E
                                         M  ^^
                                     8   1
                        to
                        5f
                            288

-------
8
m S-
3.3
alls
1
o
 •p 60 C


 £ .S S

-------
O

I'
§
u






>,
°1
S3 E
gS
11
33






"° .—
eg £
O Us
Z o. .,13 -
u. c IT nj
S 3 S£ g>8
£>•£ 1st
vl s ™ *-°
1 . . TJ .£ g S
> — - c "5 R 03
J '5 a " % «§
•3 S bo2 ^ 3
« -S .S c v, J3
c S S, o o 3
O 03 Q. *£3 HA ^
I-S'S a e «
w E « •? ^ -S
S|-al8a
llflli
§ o 3 ^ .,:=
u c 7. c S?-a
5 o S o e cs
> 'a B 'o S 03
3 &S £-2 g S
11 mil
                                          -
                                         m S
                                         r-l .ti
                                         sir
                                                                   CO
                                                                   1
                                                                   5
                                                                   1
                                                                   IS
                                                                   •o
                                                                   I
                                      2
                                     •o
           l
                                         1

                                         1
O
        fe- S S  2 §
 I      5 -8 ^  S .a
_
.O

I
        I
               1   I
                                                to
                                            290

-------













1 = 1
£ «6
e 2 S
P°




J!
^
C
C
£
U


41
3
S
cision Summarv
s
C-
»j..j
^
!
CO
S.
I
£














•>
•sl"
i §
S «
I"S
Is
33



 O bo (U 9?
m. °. .S E o o .S E O
pf N TJ 2 S 0 0 -3 5 -
8 3 S f § ? £ §- § § 3
rf or Sr Z £ ! »"&fc
sss-lai ssS-Sl
S eel S '^ §
8 .* I S x e
C x, P s -a w
J3 60 5 EC"
E "5 S E «
y — _, y ai 'E
311 S " 3
c co w > -3 -a
8 A b?^l
^ u M .
o -a x, . <5 on
S S <* s« ri c>
.s Jj E ^ y 5
"° a o bb* 5
O « O £ ^^ f-t
11 A § 1 S
S - -a 2 - | J2
a s J A -g s -a
2r^
O >n
i»{ S
3 j= C  S E c -a
5 « ™ 8 S
.rlsn
liSl-8
oo u g--a u
 -
"J3 'P "o 2
Ee"
= 2 ro g5 u
S C „-;•= C
^ O -— ^ O
>- u 2 ^ g
S u oj o E?
0 'S E .S ^
<
x"
1 s
I 1
T3 \
C g w
3
0 S
O *
o /^ o *^
« 2 o i 5
31 £lg
5 "S -s
g^ ™ «
M * _M TJT
iJ *C °? .5 jj

"S§'3l2!8n v n u
*~" ?5 ^« ^ ft ^^ ?• S"
QS£2uO"3o ,r
^of ^gSg^^jOfei
S«lSlll^l
|.|lj5|f || J
^iislllll
C 66
M C
2 oj •—
1 * i -e
E _ vu, o-
2 S o w
g - e •§ "g
"o « P e" w
§iil§
"C 03 O ^^ O
ra 3 u & bO
11* ?«
liHS
•o 5 .2 w
"2 4J £ U 0
e oo1*" s -a
ra *o _r o w
e — 3 ° .S «
o « j= a e g-
'a -a ™ o s E
g e c « | g
« ra 8 e 8
w S JS •§ -a §


**1
^i
||I
WO 3
35

ai .ii
1 -ai
•3 j: c a
" •is n w
t3 '5 .60
sv-8il
»j- £ S S 3
60 M 60 Ti
•§.S g^^.S-o
— E •= „ <5
"lefi-i-3
s c X -n « -a
£ 8 £ J i S
if -t
5 1
1 1 1
§ irf
§ < •§ s
C 5 C R M
*~ A *« O »-*


1
S
*

oj JS
M 9
"S a
TS o.
*!
al
requiremen
Individual c


























                          S
                          B.
                          M
                          I
                             > S E
291

-------
eg
is
 u
•at
«
 g-8
o
o
CO .
o i
o *•
t^ iJ
fc~§
          fc
        •- p-
       _ ™ «
      = £?
      o  -
         -s c >
      S ' « -S I
      si & 2 «
       .

      II5HJ
      H u ra « -o -D
      O *S
      m 2
      c >
      811

      111
                       18 g rt
                       3-o a
                       SB*
                       „ u 2
po
G

TC

cor

cancer risk
                       Si
                       ^•3,
                       'S. e
                       dj w
                       u
                       'is
                       00
                       •5-5 e
                       C/5 W5 CJ

                       '8'8 |
                       •82 g

                       5»1
                       O nl Xi
                       •3-6'S
                       S
                       «
                       ^•E
                       o > S

                        2
                        01
                       III
                               s"«?
                               (-H (U C
                               £&l
                                       I
                               Tf

                               S
                                ja
                                  •6 c
                                  ~z Si
                                      £
                                         £•
                                         5
                                   u a 1 S § _-
                                   i^ c H ri _Q *n
                                i^dilill
                                M-'~  cSs-^P-
                                  ; •a -- E .g s & S
                                             in
                                             in
                                          «
                                          s
                                          6
                                      8
                                              2
                                              o

                                    1
                                    •o
                                    'S
                                    3
                                        S
                          292

-------
o
a.


I

       I
       §.
-C   fTf
^^   cj

•O   o"



111
  2"o
G -S C
O  yj QJ

.fa o S'
•2 > Js
                                                       8.1
                                                       st
                                                1
                         "8
                         1C
                         •§.
                                                        o
                              "S-fl
> -p  3
O S  „-
                              |-|
                              .1 S
                                                            60
                                                            .S
                                                            "
                                   o
                                    K (A

                                   $ s
                                   > 1
                                  «   c
                                  ^   E
                                  CO   '

                                  I   s
                         .S   ,0
                         00   CO
                         .5   "?
                         a   o
                                                                           jf S
                                                             I
                                                                    o
                                                                    If
S
w

2
                                                                        I
                                                                        o
                                      293

-------
•a £
   o
   a.
   3
Components of

Selected Remedy
o
o
o

§
                    nr /""\
                    1 s
                   ij
            ~\t
        o .5
        O T3
        O CU
             E 8
"S 5 S -g 8 S j»
 M U ^  ffl 'c «  g
= -o -S w g^ a  5
 3 c -g U £? < j=
tn CO > CX O CLH  Q-
                            X.    j_i
                            ON    w
                            O    T-H
                                                                         88
                                                                          .  . =?   0
                                                              .  .
                                                             o  o
                                                             0  0 .ti
                                                             vO  CO  0,

                                                                   8
                                                                  -
          0 S
            -
                                                                           o\
                                                                                              o c


w
1
CO
la,
3

if>
^
cu
^> \
5 »
•(3 3
.Su>
^3 "
s 1
x G
£ =5
II
T3 C
(U ™
00 =
•a p
_3 »
"w -&
N.S
C CO
'£,.£

11
_ c
5 8
5
12
'33
cu
•a
1

f
'I
1
(fl


S
1 1"
•* 1
T3 CJ
backgroun
•ad, and m
*Lt
3 ~
TD E"
a .2
§ E
> Q
s S
a -c
01 °
u
a &
Excavati

and sedi

and rev

over en
                                                                         1
                                                              O
1 •-    s
   n3    T3


 °-"  I-S
on u  o a
^ .§ j= 2?
                                                                         0
                                                                               5
                                                              cu
                                                             u
                                                              a

                                                             h
                                                                                 »
                                                    294

-------
O

a.
3



I
u
                    t

                   - cs
                        _
                       CN*
      ., o s! eo —  u x
      J2c"fj_,i,:c66
      SSfeft^^^s
            S b
•s-6-
§-ip^£
e >< a y ^ ..'
      60 « .S .S

      fi e c"S
      H o £ S
in
\o
p

d
             •*
             o
     ill
        "
     iflif^af
     » fi ,. S -o :.- -S
        ill
                                    o
                                    o
                                    O
                                 [1
                                 ^ Z
                                    II
a « .-R
2 ri ^ C

1s^'5
S c^-g

•sis"-
CO M OJ \
                                       II
                                    U O J/J w

                                    w a S TS
                                    JS -a a e
                              T3 C tS 'S
                              c u c   £-3
                                   •o e
                                         V.S-
                                         il
                                        O9




                                        1
                                   §
                                   "Is?
                                   % 3
                                                    I
                                        _r c
                                        Z&
                                                      a—
... •= "J u w »  e

SI-.-9SS * "
.It 5 2-* 2
                                     - ' 2 -5 -5 = »

                                   S|8J?i8Sl

                                   ll^tl§11
                                   OKt-iB3.aJ5u
                                              o sy £?
                                              t/5 u > o
                                   O

                                   &

                                   •a

                                   §
                                   o
                             295

-------
c«
"8
ls
 §o  o
. 2  2

 '
     .a  o?
     a.  o
                        5f*IJ
                         * C 'u
                  : «g-K-8
                  ^6 s s^sS«o
                  E-S.jQTioe-W'S S
                        8s
                        cs o
                                           o
                                           = •5

                                            '
                        296

-------
s-o a
e  a s

JJg
     o.
     3


     §

     O
    O

    '5o
    cu
    Bfi
            8
            to
                     I
                     PH
 W
 e
E
                                               297

-------
u
Q.




I
                                    8
"•f g 3-3 s-a ss^ e
S 3 <" 73 3 G J2 jgw-S •


iilsSli^l-
IE 3 jo n § H "? "i =5:
StoinHSSto^-'"?
                                                             3 ° u 'I ^ O -I
                                                             13- ts v a o 1-1 s
      •R
      o ,
      >    JE fl ^






       ^ ? 60 QJ "3 "^3

      E 13 -S 3. 2 c
      V QJ T3 ^ "u ™

      e a 2" 3 U"
        o >
        I
        1/3
        a
             60

             _E

         K
         z
                              S 60 U •= M 60

                             P to E t-< in ± .5

                              .S =3 ~a •- < "S
                              e = E E a. =
                            •3
                            «
                                      C/3 >
                                           -s y
                                           O S
                            I
                            3
                            Cfl
                                       s
                                               (^
                                               CN
8  45
                                298

-------
•o S3















i
S
n
decision Summ
1-H
•8
1
1
M
fe
i









O C i£
^ ™ (S
els
dn




J2
O
o
ex
3
C
m
S





1
Components of
Selected Remedy




CLJ
3
£
s
V5
ra
^


Threat/Problem
^^g
llS|
ie§-si
.aSli
wall
c
.0
o ^^ Q _^
CN co o SS
S -a g- §
*S feS








"S
1C
'g
a,
V3
^J
O
Z

r _,
1
|
*w
W
•s
c
o
•a
™
"s
CA
^C
X!
4—1
tx>
c
'5.
S
a

•n
cu
c
I
M
O

13
C
GW, SW, and air
contaminated with
VOCs, inorganics a
heavy metals

E
a" £
s ^ §
£ £ I


0 0 =2
3« §°
§" "ra o" w
.•S 00 3
a co c
_.- eo - c
^ U i— i («
y^ *— ' fA \«_i
^3
u
<
c
1
ra

S
>
>
c
OJ
03
S
^
u



d treatment system
c
CO
Q.
a
3
Q.
O

"8
G
'0
s.
V)
Q

T3
C
GW, SW, and air
contaminated with
VOCs, inorganics, i
metals

X
z
S 5
g 3
£ ! s


§ 88
°o" "s o 2
8-f ?fl
a 3 s »
y
S u
4j°|
JS .
f I"S
S ^b =
s E m
S" 2
e~ O -a
Ife a
P ^
E| JiP
w S = ~°
Z S 5 g
•8 a
•sll
-S §
S g>g
li. .3 " w
o S-o-g
id onsite treatment
washing, or compc
osal; GW pump an
sstoration of wetlai
C _ Q, C
CO 1^ M
c S^-g
•a c.S w
2 -S S 3f
W Cd O fn
x  §
                                    S
                                    0
                                                    O Q.



                                                    GO
                                                    I/) •—
                    5f
                                                    a
                                                    •
IS
•sl§
Teatment of soil \
or composting fol
pump and treatm
of wetlands
s <»5 §
urs
Excavation and o
aeration, soil was
by onsite disposal
POTW; and resto
S".sl£
| 'S, g U j.
a 'g § S"l JL
•isSUl?
° •£ S 3=3 -° 2
"§ -a a fi * | g
s 1 1 •§ 1 1 e
= a-s S 3 ?«
JS e^ § S^=
i J 1 'S S f '£
5 1 * | -g N
'§ |j 1 S -3 .2 J§
"§ e ? " | .§ |
(S 3 in .§> is « 5
lUil
S "3 -a 2, — co -a
5 -S g S 5 fi I
V
'I j-'e S?
^ i g S -g
1" £.is.§ h
oo-i •? -a e fe _
•3 .£> (0 C O 3 CO
Ill-Hi s'S
igaailii
0 £ &-s *° ».2
•a .2 -2 § oj ^& v
fc -o — " M 8 o "§
•§ S S =3 ^ e g
c - -a S e U" e
^ 8 § -| -g g I
= ? S o JS So £
|ll?*l3»
1 1 g 1 & > -g g
li^J&lll
w8J>2i3lgi
               illli!
               _- e o a y. T .E
               •
                -i '5 JS 11

0.
£
Q
u
.co
ti
C/5


o
CO
s
i


«
c
E
tx

,^
c

-------
c TS a
o c 5
£ a8
sis
i §*$
OH




"s
o
o
G.
3
c
s
u



Components of
Selected Remedy

§

'J? C
.So
l|f|
2 V 3 "«
u S S '"3
1 s s g
" M .2? £
w S
e
o
'5b
f^g §^!J
•llep!1^;^!
^^"^rsi^ §VO*^ r-W 0
Oin&.S^OiJd « oJ33
VH 	 |
In-situ volatilization using carbon adsorption
treatment of the extracted vapor of VOC-
contaminated soil; excavation and onsite
incineration of the remaining contaminated s(
and backfilling of the excavated areas; GW
pumping and treatment using pretreatment fc
metals, followed by air stripping and vapor
phase carbon filtering with either onsite
discharge or reinjection, or both; removing ai
disposing sludge and debris; GW monitoring;
and implementation of deed and land use
restrictions

^ «
0 "T3 ™ ~

o- 's 2 — -S
" ^ "* ^"°
^ W ~ji
1 ~v ^ g1"? e
QJ (^ ^0 qj "O ^ -rt
"^ c.S^_3 "c"2
ij" 'i "3 o "§ w ™ i
•o* 2 "u • - "" oJ ip1 oo
•i § ~ ^ | «-3|
lEglllll

S — 3
111
— '"" T3 ^"




g
S^ °§
« S o oo § •-•
all ill







1
1
W5
o
2

Installation of carbon canister filters as a
temporary measure; and installation of a
permanent alternate water supply

1
1
VI
O
Z
5 F'T
"8 ^
« »
c -S w
1"B|
" -n e
W W ffl
g-S Ef
U ia 0
5 Ql
o > S

OC
•a
^ s
E_- *
CJ QJ CO
S 2 S -
& o § S




2^ S
58 o o 2? ^
Q CO Q O O '"*
Hi 1! Hal
S>S^ S ^ S-Sss S
2
c
SQJ
e •"
"i ° gs
2^25
C M J _
8*3!
^"S^s-s
°« . 2 I
•S 3 .2 c- —
S 2 STfg
u S -c S §
^gil
H = n 2 y
^ S S 8.2

RCRA capping; alternate water supply; and
institutional controls

•a

-------
JS
     fli
       2°
       o o ™
       o o 2

       9"°" e
       o ~ e
                      I
1 =
11 w


8 3

O > a
c a

!§
qj »-*
                           b

                           ^
I  I

1  b   ~
                                            O C3 -3

                                            g 9.3
                 a g
                                                    OJ
                                                    2
                                                    S

                                                    I
                                                    o
                 §8 'a?
                 ^5 tA

               S'lS
                                                   I
                                                   1
                         so .5
                         .E E
                         •sg

                         S8
               i  1
          2  I
   S   3
«  -9   -a
                                           oa


                                           I
                                           CO
                                           g
                                   oo  M
                                   00  B
                              301

-------
i
ll

!»











1 Record of Decision Svunmary Table
Components of
00
5
53
SH
&H






>
" *S CO

r? 
W
03
^


i
Threat/Prot

e
•£•

<
!™
1
c
_o
'&
QJ
a

•" « C!
a, 2 "5
co E
O 2^ QJ




2
S
"S*
a!
CO
I
ff
•a
2
'c
o
co
O
£
C
o
•a
i
o


i
«4-l
O
e

CO

1
u


Removal of wastewater and sediment from

1
§.
u
o
2
c
.1
1
•a
c
10
1
O

c-
(0
p£j

C^ CO oj
00 C Jj
o& S U
\ ^ oo
O r^ QD


M

s
8

! II


S
t
s
!

o

o
I— (
A

o ^
pond and bog with regrading and covering
both areas and treatment of wastewater wil
discharge to stream; excavation of VOC
contaminated soil with onsite or offsite







JS e
•| W-
contaminated
VOCs, organic
metals





o3
&
5 §
2 o

















•8
« a














e
incineration; evaluation of soil washing,
segregation, and other technologies to reduc
the volume of soil to be incinerated; compa
soil capping; fencing around site and work
areas; and evaluation of monitoring prograt
effectiveness
















a


























o

s~8?
ON QJ LH
**? D, §
<» ^ ?
1||
|1|
K 3 j
js i S
I^J
§*£ ™
ro w W
^ -S "
"u !pj
c eu
5 §1
O J3 3
60
C
GW pumping and treatment using air stripp
H2O2-UV photolysis oxidation, and carbon
adsorption and reinjection; brook sediment

c
c
12, •-
O ^
0.&

A
o 'S ™
Sediment and
contaminated '
VOCs includinj

B-
ra


u
U


N


o

1
ll
l/> W
Si
 a
|
S -J3 u
|| «
•S °" •§
•|g-s
6 a-S
•ta a 1
<0 C/3 S
60 wl •>
C *H ^

w S iS


GW pump and treatment using existing air
stripping facilities with reinjection to the
aquifer

is
I

o

•£
'5 w
1 H
GW contamina
VOCs includinj
and PCE
T3-
13
E
-3
CU
5

n 2


CN

§
i
00 —
si

>,
in
"S
CO
3
s
^ ^
\ s
60 u
O cj^


















vO
00
&
CO
^ £




302

-------
c -a a
o e - &
         .5 M ? '-3 '3

         s :§ 8 s IS
          . 3

         5 c
^a|s|

ll-ll
*-J   nj   ro

Hill
'2 - ° e a
•S1£-S §
.s -S -a s -
I s 111
0 si =2 2 !>
•a c * •=- a
SS.5P1 8

     ll
          l
I.. ll
          eo o > co
             "a;
             S3  Si
        ^  l£  I

                                       §.3
                                       N D,
                                     cT tfl  ty

                                       '
                 .s «
                 7" >,
                 U (0
                 0 ^

                 u «
                 QJ
                 £ n

                 !§


                 if
                 £o
                 u K
                                      I
                                      S
                         •a
                           "
                         S"§
                         
                    a s g- « h
                    n _ e », s

                    s
                             s S
                             •»•" r<

                             1 "
                             <-> c
                    o 5
                    u -a
                                E =3 !a  w -55
                         1
                         O
                                      o
                         '0 o M

                         " "
                         ail
                                          S
                                          (U
                               ft w"
                                      E  «
                                      w  v£>
                                                         (2-S
 X
 a
 to

'x

 II
 n C
^ I

ll
                                                            •S
                                                            C 00
                                                            .1-1
                                                            00 O

                                                            ? J2
                                                                 £   -
  Igl^l
                                                           to ,_,
^ 2
c u
CO t^


li
1°
™ O
K ^.
u in
111

  8-g
  e «



ll1

111

U"« c

£ S|
E c 2

|| §
MAD
a S »
•8 S"S
s ij:
S " '3
ill
I"!
^•ii
"SSI
18 a §
U-T3 O
§ S-J
i .s -i
III
                                                            l
                                                         gf
                                                         00
SI S
E « _
        M
                                 303

-------
•si-
ll
  c
  o
  I
           o
           s.
           o\
         **"!£
         o a sfc
       a ^-is g 3 w
       £ £*3 So^
       -« g-a8.
e ^^ •§ s'S1" v  -
f  " 2 . aw Jj B«CO
    _d«^rlij#
    ySH-S «l*^
         ss
               E.I S-S1
      0
      iiilliii
      u5u>-22oB.£
          ii
          I
                     •8
                     ts
                     I
                     o
                     CO
                     M
                     I
                     •a
                                 1 oo
                         o
                         Z
                as s  2  as
                                      U5 3

                                      £f'S.
                                         1
                                            Ii|i|
                                            es to o o >
                                            o
                                            QJ
                         304

-------
•8*
a E
  a
        _c
        s
        c
        
-------
CTS a
oca
£ «Q
gls
& O, 08
JG(3 o



W5
1
O
Q.
3
C
S
u



Components of
Selected Remedy

t

:a
en
03
<:


i
S
o
Ui
a,
>
g
S
£§
ll°'l
™ C" P —
2 C S «
.SSI'S
">£.§>§
w ^
c
o
'5o
D
rt


§ g |
sSf s
5&I S
U
*c * X
3 IS g
a r|«3 S
S -1 § 9 ^
a § &5-S
a) ro co 5 w
2 w 0 8>

W fa ~ ^ tp
log "3. IJ "8
=§ 5 1 8 1 1
^§§2S!
T3
^ «
ility testing and consolidation of
e wastes and pumping contents ol
>ins and sump into storage tanks;
testing of samples to determine
te treatment or disposal methods;
ng wastes for offsite treatment or
as appropriate
•Q js 5 ~a .S 'e -
O -rt J3 r) U 5-2
|g.jfl.|li
1 1 g s a i t
U cj *j ca nj £3 "O


M
" ^ =2_
S° i? o IR o-o
.a gf g -3
§ -3 ^-5 0- .21
f>J r^H ""*
W"
L3 ^txa
•g f o- | .y J
~S ^ 5 flj *^
*^3T3-S PJ^"O « B
-aii'S'oofflra"!.
c g -3 "..-.„ oo E"
™ 'g •- c U .§ ^ -|
•^4- *? 5 S ?J
U 2 >o a. < --!


cs

I!  II
S u  S 
                   W ^M'g



                   I If!
S ^ §
•S o-S
^ E=3
ec S -S
c g,S
'a, « S
O. *w «
nee
iss
cj S S
PS fa fa
"8
IS
1
VI
O
Z
4_l
c

i?
"H-
a.
3
M
§
3
5







§
•a
GJ
^g
£
Q
*




S
2








u
2


CO
                       M
                     •a -S

                   ill
•al
ra ^
§ 8
j£
C
i
£
E

a 0
5 o
8>^
o "o



\o "w
CO C
^ =
1 s
c I -S y
^ C 3 T3
o 8 > i
JS
3
5
>E^ CO C
^ \ [T
ff ^
s Ct ^
as 1 s
                               I
                                  o
                                  CO
                                  §   2
306

-------
"o 13
s I
            ob „
     •g*
     Jc s:

     S3 J2
      8
      1
 if 1^
 ; ^ c ra
 U-S-«
 — u — a .I)  'x
 £ . -a u O w »
» £ 60 c .2 "g U 3
^•S^w^^Eo

w 6 bfc rf,
:<_:s
        iPijiii.
        is5n^i>
        g 2 O 8 £ 2
        v in > S O 55
        ...s
     O ra — " S "a "
       C u __ G bo __.

     ^ '5 .E c o a CM

     « ra ,"! ra '2 L»f ^ -^
          S£.E §
     01

     u

     "3

     I
                      §-
                      S"|
                      0 S-
                       -
                     1

                     1
                      o
                        g-
             •3 ra C 5
             u g -a w
             •a q '0 Q
               1 "n Q
              «
              ^

              ^

              T3
              C
              o
                        307

-------
o
o.
c
s
u
  '.  fe S

Rl  51

  .« So o
  c r E? "
1
o >
CD


2
a .a

         3
                        if
                         ••« •-

                          a
                        .5 m
                        &. T3
                        *"* "O CO 4J fO
                        
-------
o

I
                                             s
                o
                CO
1
 S "S ^ ? y —
                          o « 5 S g .g o
                          *O •" C ^J . •« jo CJ
                          B a
                                  vO
                                  es
                                                       1
                                                §
                                  o

                                  8.1
                                  o c

                                  si
                                                            s
                                                               S
                                                o
                                                            <4_l
                                                            I
                                                            o
                             o
                                •
                              5 2
                              •p SJ
                            = 1 B
                             vi g -^
                            •§|s
                             ra ra wj

                            o 8 >
                                               I
                                                           -S'S
                                                           •Sfi

                                                           •II
                                                           o c
                                                           •Z, a
                                         c
                                         o
A


z
                                                     K
                                                           SS
                                                                    10
                               309

-------









Record of Decision Summary Table
I
S
g



















£
i 1
c "3
P





2

2
g



1
o
Q-
c
O
Components of
Selected Remedy














| J£Q
^~ *>• 3
2 a s
•S S c
1/3 K gf




CJ
3
1
5
&


g

ti
3
S
CLi
\
*j
£


.0
"w
1
S
&
B
.0
00
 y P co o m irt oo
""* "£j QJ ^ ^ O LJ 3
i! J; ifi -^ i "ob Si « .c ~ .y
Excavation and low temperature thermal
treatment of soil followed by backfilling;
capping site with clean top soil; GW pumping
and treatment using air stripping and carbon
adsorption followed by reinjection or other type
of recharge into the aquifer; disposal of soil
and GW treatment residues waste at a RCRA-
approved facility; air and GW monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls
including GW use restrictions

"5,
8s
$•£

0 'S
'S-o %
•S T3 00 M ")
•-- C Ul
5 « £ f~i * •• 00
f 00 ™ u M c
£ 11 =3 8 ! 
S^s?9
s^sS
^2^ y M w
ra eg ,>• tu c]
a, 0 5 •§ |j
J "§ 2 ^ £
™ a) — O «
o Q. c • nj
t/5 to S in >
Excavation of soil with disposal under cap;
slurry wall installation (completed); SW and
GW treatment with air stripping; and extension
of municipal water supply to affected residents

"§,
o
S
co"
00
w~ :s
fe-S^ =
v* -i* ~ "7^
0 £ oo c
1-Sl s
CO *-> 3 -i-
<8 — C
^r c y «
-1|sw
f i Q •§ 8
c/2 o > oj a,


|
ra K^
£J co
1 2

W tx "
o o 42


M

l/^ C^1
S 3
SI

u
ra
S 2
? 
n
VOCs, ini
organics



iff cd
CO .C
*\ ™
CS i
\ „
§ 42












existing water supply system























R
00 /~N
,
1
73
i
"O
^C







u
O
,^N
1 s
213
5 j<
en
TS'C
i §
Hazardous
21 ppm ba
agent with residual discharge to POTW;
additional investigation of the GW to determine


^
0











CO
M
x^
s









"5
if there are no lev
NESHAP
ingestion, :
exceeding
extent of contamination; and limited GW
monitoring, if GW remediation is not required
ft

II
•«• s











c
E

VI



310

-------
  .2


£ §'
     .2
       • e o ea

^ '5 •£ g?
<" i .» o
                        c X -a «

                        8 > g o,
I
                                  *>• S
JB S


11
             a -c

             S-i
                                  «l

                                  I I
                                  S--S
                                        8
                                        "> 2
                                                                g
                                                                        o " a   g

                                                                        llfil
                                    a  «
                                                    a ^   P

                                                sIII a?


                                                Itilli

                                                I I ff.S 5 I
                                                8 1 i ." 1 =0
                                                 3  C 0 vK    e
                                                •a .0 -a .,  ,„ g
                                  "S
                                  ts

                                  I
                                  &
                                                D !••§  S. 13  8  o
                          I
                                                o
                                   . -C

                                    .tJ w
                                  u

                                  T3 •«
                                  C C
                                  .5 2
                                  Jli
                                  D.

                                  E
                                  T3


                                  g
                            •c y ^
                            .S H O
                            S bo.S
                                                  S-o  -

                                                  E -S |
                  CO


                  ^

                  CO
          T
          c

          E
                                                O
                                                        ra
                              311

-------
Itl
',30
   O

   ex
   3
   C
          I
            QJ
            if S
          I
           o
2   S
c   S?

I   |

5   I
           o

           o"
           00
                     •if
85
                            "w
MH      ^   MH

 '  -S  ^   '
%   &  ^;   "
s  K  n   ^
                     58.3
                                g
                                •a
                                1


                      c  c
                      O u fli
                      •g is a
                      JS  b
                                "8
                                o
SI  g   2
                           eo S  o S


                           ft  SI
                           co u  i—i CQ
                           ift vii  6% vS
                                            i
                                             I
                                             JJ
                                             5
                                             -
                                  o.
                                  a.


                                  J |


                                  11
                                  2 E
                           .2 S

                           I if

                           I 1
                                  1


                                  I
                                             o
                                             2 "o
                                             c c

                                             8 a
                                             > O
                                             r?   S
                                                  CK
                                                  O
                                               .^
                                       g =
                                       °. o
                                ill!!'




                                 S ° -n e
                                 ™ a c tj 2
                                 S S 'S g "
                                 c   .S -
                                 IB "- ,5 C


                                 ill'i
                                '(3 e 2 S 2 «
                                 E 2 5 8 o. =5
                                    5

                                    "O
B

S
                                   312

-------
  .52

  §
  O

  a
  u
•8'
a
6S
        •*>•


        O .
             sg

             $ g
             rH re
             PA ,1U,
        I
        o
  fll

  '* «f
= ||
  IE?
el °
™ S fl
                   a.§
                   CO O.

                   SfS
                   c

                   1
                   a
                O 5

                of §
                1-1 C

                *!

                   I
                   S *

                   rs
                   S -c
                   nj tj


                   ll
                   u 53
                   B -a 'c1

                   1 g g
                   u E f
                   •S __ -g »
                   sSS S.S
                   °£||


                   c'lli
                   § 1 1 I-
                   w S o, M

                             1
                    "8-a
                    ll

                   £?
                   2
                   (X

                   g"
                               g o
                               8 >

                                          Si 8
                                        o 8 >  o
                                                   1
                                                   o
                                                   -  _
                                                   j- e -3 s
                                                           1
                                                     s
                                                        S c  S
y^

Is
                                  313

-------
  i «- «- .S B
   O O e 'H u_

   60 60 S fl O



  "'S "! "2 c""a

   ft-2 g §5

     a to'g s
w •- E

1 Srfll
JI-8
OS 8S T3
i
o
"i -
  '
      2
fllii
S  in
a  00
             •-
                      3 60-*
            jp.a


            ^1
            C|
            0 g
            132
            H-s

            U'I
            S o
            P ^
               1  -tSg|ll^

               slft-sliSl

               ililg^l^g

               ^gE^S^-S - P

               •a .S. 8 .s •« -S u 1
               <3go;'SsS = S'
               ^ 5.5 g- B a S S
               3 _»j ., «


               |lf2"^
               QJ rv C -Q £; *
               C QJ O flJ QJ "-^

               J b S 8 "S- "*
               "H, cs -o ex S
               g e 3 ex s
               .5 a < o o
             o o

             o" o~
              •a
              u
              .
             u P
             .
              s|

              §1
              o -a
            3
                        C
                       cs
                                       a.
                                       cs -
                                       a ~ ^ c
                                       S "9 U 'C
                                       •s S J s

                                       I ™ I 1'
                                       IB CXrs .2
                                       S ^s g,

                                       "n •- C m
                                       •a S e

                                       Hil

IP!



11^



I §11
                                                   •s
                                                   CO
                       314

-------
S c o
els
80s
£ u
1
o
0.
n
U
Components of
Selected Remedy

V
(fl
CO



E
jy
"I
£

CO
Si
.c
E-i

O
1^1
5 cu _
— ^ 3 ^
S n "5


t/5 a;
c
o
'oo
cu
A
08
2 <*
^0)
t-. ^
IN m
^-.f
m t-H

T3 CO
^ I-


(N


|f
& £
Pollution Discharge Elimination
System, Technical Operations
Guidance Series, Ambient Water
RCRA capping; leachate/GW collection and
dewatering of the landfill with onsite treatment
and offsite residual discharge; hydraulic


^
c
CU
g




8 "c
'c ra
00 03
O g-
__
c ^
CO .S J2
c°3 "3 d
ill



00
00
^
CO

o




s
1 o
1^-1
00" vO c
tn co a
 & ««
Sediment will be treated to a
100 mg/kg established
background concentration.
Standards for total cadmium
Hydraulic dredging of sediment with chemical
fixation and offsite disposal; dredging, water
treatment, and disposal; marsh restoration; and
site access restrictions


\
CO
00
o
0~
CO


M-o
1118.
w 2 *u "u
• r .s c -^
c P: "" .y
S | j« E

.« c S r^
•a o w c
1 8 E.|

C/3 ^S 5 U
c?
OJ
I
C \D
O CO
•S ^
E ro

IS 1


IN

I 1
is i- 1 i
c ^ 2 s, g.
&& w-5£>
water concentrations include
6.6xlO"4 mg/1 and
2.0xlO'3 mg/1 for water hardness
levels of 50 mg/1 and 200 mg/1,
respectively
















•b-J
^3
8








45




I- o
58 o o
0 ° " °
g -a * 2
s- § s 5-
(N c v 2
S vS vb »
o.
3
C
u
o
en
1
1
a.
Decontamination of the inside surfaces and


^
>,
o
0
"O
c
CO
^
O
c

E
•5
S
^
1
^
a
CO
oa
c
o



1


CN

o
o, 2 rv

goals for indicator compounds.
The ACLs are below Federal and
State MCLs, if available, and
include PCE 0 ug/1 and TCE 3
contents of the former battery facility, and
excavation of cadmium-contaminated soil and
the dredge spoils vault, followed by onsite
fixation of the excavated soil, dust and vault


*TJ "§
C
/_^ o .5
I 11



•o 2?
a •— "a
C ^ CO 00
1 g w- !
S — ' p 3
C r^ "u
^ X "O .E
M > g J£
*c ^- "^5
£ -S w jr"
u -5 y a
•a s ts E
^
;—
t— , "0
S 05
" _
c -J2
CO C
OH «
E3
•a
(S 1




I
— ' — ^
s_ , » — ,
2
1
1°
u "
3 W
sediment with offsite disposal, and backfilling
excavated areas; excavating the VOC-




(A
2,



















-a
B
cs




o1
CO
IN
' — '
E
0
CN
"3
1
institutional controls; and evaluation and
performance of repairs, if needed, to the
inoperable sprinkler and heating systems inside
the former battery facility































315

-------
^
£ -o a
oca
£ «3
sis
8 S-8
a,

w
1
o
a,
1




>%
mponents of
ected Remed
33







cu
E
3
P
>
S
-2
^


1
15
1
^

gj
£
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
o
'5o
u
ai

$48,499,500

Acceptable sediment



ited sedimeni
CO
um-contamin
•|
*o
CO
60
C
'&
H
Q


^
g
O
i/T
IT)
1

__
2
y

C
e
J

Ss
S c
£1
0 >>
a*
concentration of cadmium is
mg/kg. Expectations are tha
S-a
|g
OK/\
OO
•§•!
18 U
1*
*ZJ (—
gf
,2 >
la. >
ite chemical
nt sampling
W 0)
0 E
=3
>, 5
J3 %
"S -a"
C1J CO
> w
O gi,
li


C

.a U
,« o.
O w
•g a
co ra
>
•o
3
M

t technology
e
n of treatme]
.0
CO
3
C
•a
c
g
•o
c
CO














Former Radium




































Processing or
Utilization Area




                           8 s
                           I
                            I
                            i
                            •s
                            > PJ


                            l!
                            II
                            o >
                            tu _-
                            e .&
                            O JS
316

-------
o
a.
3

i
u
    a
    s
     s
li
    "8
    is


    1
    o
    §.s


    II
    8 «
    o >
           I
                o
           S J3 S
           •Sf g

           I*?

           *r.lh
               ~ c X
               Q O P
               (X u >
         S  <"
         £  S
                    CO
                    CO
           I  1  I  «
           Z  >3  O  -H
                          O O
                          o o
                          O O w


                          §S|:
                                    881

                                      '
                              '•§
                             "e  -0 "
                             JO N .£ §

                             OJ -C _C OJ
13 = O OJ -C
lal**:!

"till
   »«= B •-1
ffSI


1
I
                              o
                               1
i|,  i
222  2
                                      g S
                     317

-------
K
1

ex










•*









QJ* U
EP-
tr
ro rp
.— ra
" K


TJ a
C <"
CO °
S g
'S. 08
30



W5
§
O
o.
3
C

U


Components of
Selected Remedy

V
3
1
0)
VI
&
S

Threat/Problem
^ c
2 o
S'§
Signature
Remedial /
e
o
'5b
OJ
rt
o
o
o
in" £
s 1
CO- §
s£
OJ
ex
o
si
1 n
« M
S 2
£ o
— W5
"Si
_ . -Q
S c
l!
1 s
H to

GW pump and treatment using air stripping
and, if necessary, carbon filtration with

"8
e
1
V5
4—1
O
2
J3
1 £
GW contaminated
benzene, and tolue
>•
z

oT
CXI
S.
_c
1
T3
O

(N


S
c
i
m E
H/i -J
OO ,-r
1 1
la*
111
•B 53
U O M
§ e g
fa S «>
s-,—
C CO
0 JJ 3
:s b 3
3 E -S
C T3
8 S S
J3
be
discharge into an upgradient injection well
system; hydraulic control of the plume throu
installation of GW recovery wells; GW





^
'5
M .„
e -M
and metals includil
chromium and lea<
contaminated with
\
S.E
'0 -a
S §.
65-Acre Mi
Industrial 1







W — ;






"§tl .^
0.025 mg/1
, benzene r
toluene 50
•s^-«
1^ S
— - ^ nT
^bx -°
E a1 2
in E Si
9 9 S
o m -o
oo3
monitoring; completion of the landfill cappin
(29 acres previously capped); continuation ai
expansion, or enhancement, of the leachate






•a
c
nJ
•f:
IX
%
1
(U



03/17/88
1st - Final


a . S"p
IliSH
III^I*
a u% §9«0
 •H, •
z,
o
00
 c
1-1 C
S«S









01
RCRA capping with slurry wall containment
system and site grading; and GW and leachal
recovery and treatment






to
CB
1



06/06/84
1st - Final


S
K~ ^
CN"M o g
II II





•a
ta
I
o
T3
J3 C
Removal and offsite disposal of drums and la
packs; and excavation and offsite disposal of
visibly contaminated soil with GW pumping a
removal

-a
S
I
o

(/r &
.a ~s
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, PCBs, organ
pesticides, and met

•-a
Z
1 •* ~%
CO CO C
fe ^ s
J< m
•2. > "
•' § s

(N
318

-------
lulitl!
   "•s 3 8
o
iL
                   81  8"!
                   r-i D-  i-l C
                    . w   . c
                   CN u  rH nl
                      -
                    o

                    U >
                      lilt
                      S « qj w
                        qj X3 4-j

                      w< 2  G

                                             b V
                                             nj Ul
                                           22 so

                                             C3 ej
                                          •a
                          .E i I




                       SL3.N ft
                       bo S? ^ CS L-
                       e .S fe M S
                      •a = S SP-c

                       2 2
S § T, a g 60


^ •- c 'C to 'S
s -a P S s 2
•S C > .  -l *s

                                          o

                                           1   1!
11 -s'
                        o o u -s a
                        o > H O E
                (^
                oo

                Sj


                ^
                o
                                          .E >•   ™

                                          •S*   £

                                          lia"   Ki
          S

          ^
          CO
                                                       §tA

                                                       I-H
                        319

-------
              **-t
              II
    &
                                                a
                     I
        .2 o
<0
3

1
J
         1
            i
                     o
                     2
                      >s
                    5 -g

                    e **
                    § .S
                              2
                             •g «
                             TO O
                    O =3



                    .1
                             o
                                   o
                                   o
                                   es"
    QJ
    3
    S
    o.
    ^
O > § .S B
                      •5 8
                      ''
                      •
                     c g w
                     ™ 2 3
                     a 8 >
                                               w"


                                        toll^S
                                        11-5 a-tf
                                      a
 >  *j ^-<
OS^
g PK,

nil
    O
    b
     !   !  ?!
     £Z  5  I
                >  w
                 1
                     .
                     ex
(S
T3
C
                                    01
                                    o:
                             320

-------
u
               ol
       2 •
       •*
SI S ?
o 0 S3 C
o 2

if
                                   o
                                   Jg J,
       "i.
       in"
          00

          1
          o
                             1
                             o
2

'§•
S
-

                                                  g «

                                                  I
                                  I
                                        I
                                                                         r*
                                                                f^NI
                                                                E 
                                  I
                  !•     !   .1
                  0     ^   fc

                  II   §   «
                  S tL,   O   i—I
                                    321

-------
  u

  a
  3
  B
  U
   ,
'S'S

U
        —
       tx 3

        '
      25   o

     o S   oC"«  o

     §1   Sf  I
       1
o,


3
Q.



U

T3
B
to


bo
B

'S.
d,

3
       1
       o
       Illl

       ;  g|
       u 8 ? .s
          I
                                  il  Sfl^l'l

                                  *ll^!^E
                                        o s^^-ss
                                          U2 C8 =3
                 o
                 -C

                 '5
                                       §1
                                  §."
                                  E 00  .S-
                                  ™.S £ fi
III
,«'§ 8
 .§ 8^
                                  tf TD C O< — J5

                                  S S 'fi .1 '§ -8
                           " S
                           S 8
                                       _
                 C >H

                 u5 Z
              CK
              O
      §  ^2
                                             ^S
                                              ^
                                             S s
                                             S E
                                             « a
             611
                                             $*
                                             I
                                                     II
.s 'a i
-a ]£ bo
B =3 E
*3 O -r1
nog
                                                    .2 E w
                                                    •p w =5

                                                    1=3-1
                                                    •g
                                                    ta

               8 >
                                             !

                                             15
                                                         o
                                                         CO
                                                        1
                                                               o
                  H
                              322

-------
X
fc
t- T3 £9
o c «
S §5
|ll
«s " °




IA
1
O
a.
3
r"
u

Components of
Selected Remedy

a;
3
£
cu
wi
n
&

Threat/Problem
> c
. S g
gfcS'J
« 5? 
2 o ?
t |Ss
o co o. 2?
(A «* ^? O

^
"5,<*
E °
8CJ
c
g!
!• a
r^U
_r w
o
s|
* c
c/1 ^-«
TJ Hi "x
Z-S2
S-s q
> -r- O
O ? K

No further action with GW monitoring


- & « a
w>S SS


gr^
t°A
s s-iS
2 u
U3 -g 0.
jc « e
III
* u C
(U X O
0 OJ U
!-£:§
N1^
nj _ <_r x
•SlJlt
wa r5 ..
Capping; removal of tanks and building debri
with offsite incineration; treatment or disposj
of tank contents with offsite disposal of tank;
and building debris; excavation and offsite
disposal of buried sludge waste area; and
excavation and offsite disposal of PCB
contaminated soil


1
1
CA
4_>
0
2

GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs

3
S 8
1 1 -
1 § ,2


(N



o
o
°, ~
if
in" S
«« -r.

00
""l^
M ob 3
g E s
• M
JJ M C
j= To 3
U i-i C
co g co
0 JJ gl
" "r^1
lit
-IS
•its

Excavation of lagoon sediment and highly
contaminated subsurface soil with offsite
disposal.


*•)
\ *
>• o
8 8
tx O)
e
GW, soil, and sedimei
contaminated with
VOCs, PCBs, organics
2
t/r
c
'8
at •*>
00
c \
O Os
U IN
R fc
in o


CN
^.^
s


„
o —
S-S
S i
al


•P s
standat
' treatm
° ?
X 0
Ul
M ,2
•a "-
S *j
flj n
g SB,^
— • w *-*
11 li
«l^§
tS.S-s'1
p p a .&
S *-s
^TxT >- C
^ efc-a co
|N 1 »
5 W — "ai
u U ~ >
.E S S ^
E










1
i
s
2
t/3
U
1

Installation of GW monitoring wells with
implementation of a monitoring program to
delineate extent of plume; GW treatment usir
air stripping followed by reinjection; exhaust
gas analysis; and soil sampling of former drui
dumping and storage area


•g
IS
1
v:
O
•z.
.c
GW contaminated wil
VOCs including 1,1,1-
TCA and DCE

§ 1
oT d<
- .2
rO Q
II


(N











c»
00
^
nj m
$ t














"3
C
K
CA




(

o o _
o o o
°- °. — 0
O O CO
o o .t; <-r
 ro
"i ^
CU g
•a^
CX **
3 CO
CD o
iil
u
O
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
with discharge to either a GW recharge area
a public water supply system; installation of
chloride monitoring wells near the coastline;
and GW monitoring


"8
c
1
(/5
O
2
_e
GW contaminated wil
carbon tetrachloride
£>
I* 1
y £ !jS
!•§! i
fil i


(N
/- N
s
_S(
a
8?
»- S
8 g
fel






















CO
oo
^
CO
5?
o
































1
b
a
T— 1



323

-------
n ~a
f S
el
CJ rs.
1(3
OH













iponents of
B
u




















£
l|<3
*fl
•Sag
1/3 Si
on




a
3
s
g




M
a,
3
i
u







>,
•8
i
1
JB
A




aj
E
_3
O
>
V
v
1


1
2
E
CL,
\
1

C
C.
<
*c
1
!
pi
c:
c
'5
a
OH

|
1
3f


1
C
,
JS

•n





8
3
1
S
S
"O
•i
i
j=
1
%
o
IS
£
u
o
CJ

g
o.
00
in
«}



^
i— i
T— *
1
f-
d
ta
%
£
60
C
'E
3
43
(fl
1
stripping, am
with discharj
i system; and
.fa
n
w~
i
a
D.

^
"S*
Cu
3
v5
"E.
60

w
^
bo
C
"3
g
1
8
>







c
_g
•e
5
"S
!













u
K
•a
c
ra

tx
co
^
1




O
•3
3
.Q
1
•a
U
|
a,























S
3
1
c
c
CO
OJ
C
O
N
1
^
3
CO
0^
o
OJ
1
_o
X
u
^

JJ
•5
3

1
y
i
8
5
M
•s
?
o
I
0
1


















tS
T— 1









00
cs
tu
c
(U
J=
^J
_o
r-j
^y
*c
T3
C
M
1
tv
d






S
1
g
O
•a
3
£*
•fi
M
'•3
u
1
Q.




























'o
nment
2
n
a
ra
2
3
1
i










































o
•a
S
(a
•a
g
3







'w?
I
£ §
15
IB
1




































•§
a




































 . _  o ^
 • O  in -—

IU  S,
W-r




I

  eo
  C
O >
 o,
 3
If  §
> ?  o
.1 "i

^.a-SPlr
i~ stilvsl'
t/5 60 r-1 S E BO.
            O

            8
            o
                 11
            H1
            a g j«

            _-| 2
            JS
            OJ

            IS
         OS
         M



         I  «
        324

-------














V
3
ord of Decision Summary T
<2
1
s
rsl
gj
§2
fT
&t











c-a S3
£83
S-ls
83*8
(X °
V.
1
O
c
C
S
u





Components of
Selected Remedy

u
3
•X
5
^
£!
W5
03
E
CJ
3
\
4->
£


^^§
E!°I
co C^ 1)
2 > 3^2
all's
w S ||
KS
c
•a
CJ
rt
"8
ia
(A
S
z


V
3
.1
"5.
ex
CO
S
z
(4-1
O
J2 v
B-S
^ c
> 'S
:stigation results indicated very lov
tamination. Because risks fall witl
> S
S 8
jy
2
CO
.0
*-l ".
5 ex
2; co



S
o
Z
41
2
W3 3
T3 2
(0 "o
ll
5«

tN














a
s
c/3
OJ
:ptable range, as determined by th
y
































EPA, no further remedial action i;
•o
c
CO














8

















sidered necessary
8












&
'G
_£
CO ^
Resident!,
Treatmen


 S s -o =• _   _ „
 e|SSr--?H-s
 EX'S 
       325

-------







1 Record of Decision Summary Table
M
S
£
*.
m

fe


























e -a a
o c g

ill
£3°

Cleanup Goals
Components of
Selected Remedy
u
E
_3
P
^*

 3 .2


 a

tj
to
a,
2
*^ t~v
^ CO
u ^
•o fNi
*w *^ w

& 2 o rt


oq



0 ^
& 'S,
w ^i
.
||



IN



S
S
S

O 3
t^ ,
vO ^
.t! "O







residuals; offsite disposal of contaminated
asphaltic material, and repavement of roadways
and driveways; perched water treatment in
sewer trench; construction of hydraulic barrier
at end of sewer trench; conduction of
















in
§




LO 10
CO .C


"\ ^
Os t/5
O rH












































treatability study to determine effective PCB
and soil treatment; and sewage and sediment
sampling

































s
°8
=>-, °
LO — " O *"3
t^ ra o ™
SS IS
:>
Soil will be excavated to the Nev
Jersey Environmental Cleanup
Responsibility Act (ECRA) target
level of 1.0 mg/kg total VOCs.
GW will be treated to MCls
which include TCE 5.0 ug/1,
chloroform 100.0 ug/1, barium
1,000.0 ug/1, arsenic 50.0 ug/1,
cadmium 10.0 ug/1, chromium
50.0 ug/1, and lead 50.0 ug/1
Excavation of soil with removal to an offsite
disposal facility for incineration; regrading,
revegetation, and site restoration; GW pump
and treatment using air stripping and carbon
adsorption with reinjection; and provision of an
alternate water supply to affected residences




•a
>,
o
o



w" •"
«Sl
S bo E
^. -a -S -a

" 1 1 J
n ra '« 'S
"s § o &
C/l U > 0

«
P*
1
t^ ^
« CO C
E \ [T
10 ON


•> H2 ON trt
> 2 O r-l


CS


O
|

g

a
OJ
•s
c
1
10
c
_
"u
O
Excavation and onsite solidification of soil and


T3
X
Q

§-
CO
•a
c
to
5
Lr
c

1
"
1



><

IT3
O


Q
>"


CN



^^
I
NS
.u
"o
 0
bO
_C
^
I
3 co

 &4 O











offsite thermal treatment of tank oils in
addition to other soil collected at the site;
cleaning and demolition of empty storage tanks;
and surface grading


10
bo 'g'
o c
o ^ 
-------















E-O a
5 c S
> a 8
e 3 s
I'fg



Jtf
c

1



01
••M
X


£
? Record of Decision Summarv
S

00
fe














Components of
Selected Remedy
.3
*o
>
M

S

OH
I
J=


 w -a
6 ^ ^
fl n Si —
Sill
1/3 s.&g
c
o
'5b
S


4_J
"* c
*-* o3 o
Hi
*4M
O
to
_e
1 ^
fs
' o
IE
•3 'E
a S
a -e
T3
•« s
2 S

.a S
T3 X
^ffl "
Excavation and offsite stabilization
contaminated soil, followed by offsi
in a landfill; and replacement of thi
soil with clean fill
„

0
1
€
1 S?
.S =6
E 3.
e-S 1
— 3 p
SI-S
04 f*>
.5 '"5
JO tt,
04 "co
« 'S
T3 3
J "S


CO
 .

10
«/> >
 E
 CO


, £

o o
o o
o o

\o~co~;
TJ* \o
          -

        CO" S
8 S
o g


5"g'
tv CL
          I

C

v w".i2

              t
              lill
a geotex

of waste
on

ar
  IK!,

  Mill

   lip
   ro 5  "5
   C  Qj" o

  f'PJN
  'P =3 C CJ ..
  CO O Q .S3 S
  a " a, -a -53
  fs *.s §

  t?.in

  ft?f{
   u a. ? ^
  - 1 E - -a
  8 i tiS g
   ii
   o ^
   O yj
   o -s
iment and

slope stabilit

after testing;

and a
sed
§
 cu
              fis
              e 8 a

              7 fe
              X § to


              t/5 co S
   •§

                  m s  S
      327

-------
  U
<^H -H
O S
a |
g Si



P
as
O O ,_!
o o e
o o 3

o" o" K3 U ^

8 S B, g .|
                   88T3-S

                   *o~ oo~ •
                   O 00
                   CO CO
                   
ted
be
                                                   I
                                             S J£

                                             g.S

                                             e I

                                             S u

                                             5 v
                                              £>
                                               to
CLs

ilabl

incl
goals

(MCL
                                                   1
                                             .

                                           11
                                           c c
                                                    S <
                                                    to —
                                                   5  J.  =
                                           -a §

                                            B 'B



                                            - 1



                                           "1
                                            >N *?

                                                              5 "8 =a

                                                              Sii
                                                              ™ a
                                                                      5>
                                                                          I
                                                                                  to
                                                                  1   I   S
                                    328

-------
13
1
§    «i
H* £  •
" ? :
1! §  o "
«5 8  > ~"
            o
     .2       eo    13
     Q       «    .5    -5
     a       ^    fa    F
     ft  s    N     i     i
o?    ft    -S <    <^    «
5    ;S    oa B<    o    ••*
|   ^    tt
n   o    ,-H
                                                                                  .


                                                                                  «5    I
                                        329

-------
£
O "§ M
^ - o
c 2 g
S '5.3
£ 5 o

0.
3
C
U



*
X
•8-8
si
« «
1*8
IB
33

i
1
^
c
c
!
< S
TO



E
CU
.0
%
s
£
^c

oT i? g 'g
•-a 1^
Maw|
c
o
'ob
 TO !x
e
si
1 1
CJ CU
'C ^
s M —
13
TO
1
:>
T3
C
(9
yf
C

U
1
"S ^
4J ra
« "Jfl






S
S 0

•S ™
•g £?
^^
S^
'i ™
I 1



§
ON wi
O M




2^
ejfcj o
||e °-
3 § ^ 1-1

1
a
3
i
.52
2
cu


<
<,
£
'o
c
2
s
£
3
^-
O
c
_o
1
s

_
S
V)
O
z
.g


?
CO
c
'§
ra
c
i
5

^
i
%


CO


4-^
If
o, S

for vanadium; however, an
unpublished Estimated Advisory
Concentration for vanadium of

J_
s
•a
c

<
c
Q
tc
TR "o
S..S
TO^S
^ *?
>> §
1 E
•!£
^"5
ag.






13
_u
"S
00
ll
"^ "re
'w §
aj "2
C CO


i
_«
OJ
CO £









U_i
tc
1
i
'I
1
tv
tx






































water systems. Remediation wi
attain the Clean Water Act leve



























CO
CO
X
o









E
Tj-
CO
1
U
'5
£



























1
E
•a
c




f^
i- §°f
§ 1 1 1 1 %
<£ 5^ 1 " TO S^
* R
Soil will be excavated until
organics are undetectable (<50
mg/kg). GW performance level
include benzene 0.005 mg/1
(MCL), phenols 3.5 mg/1
(AWQC), chromium 0.05 mg/1
(MCL), and lead 0.05 mg/1 (MC
0 2
di QJ
ifiu
i|rg.||

111 «f .s
s ^ a | 'B 1
O n ^ '" "O
^3 ^ « p cu 3 ej
S c = = " S |
t».2 ^ 8 a § §
g (a | efts S S
If a ill I
w a u u ? > o.


\
8^
O ™
CN g
ro
'S u,
TO -rT CJ
^ u? y TO 'S
'? oo ° °° c1^ §>
"llfllll
1 '§ '- g ^ ^ -| g
iliiiiii
5 E
u ~o
Q c
1 1 | I
Ss i i s


CO


8 s
°- 1 '•s
S >3 i

Remedy prevents exposure to
concentrations of TCE in excess
of Federal, State, and local
health-based ARARs

CO
g
X
"H.
Q.
3
VI
S =
co 'C
*.i
£ ^
i ^
^5
13 O
C "O
TO C
«- «
O ".
!i S
1!

-a
CU
S
(A
O
z
.£

^E^
cu ^
S C
c .5
I"3
S "w w
C .S M
5 § c
U > TO
&i

ta S
1 1
U f-


co

s^
?f
i i l
8 la





























§
^
(N to




330

-------
^
c TJ a

^ ra o
111
a,3o
Q,
3
C
U

J
Components of
Selected Remedy
g
i
!
5


6
QJ
3
2
OH

CO
£i
£


.xSJ
^ X f*^ U
E 5; <


•i s il
V3 p;
c
.0
£?
rt



o
o~
•*£>
CN_
5
C
'1
g

Installation of dual-activated carbon adsorptior


o
z
.g
1
T3
ra
_c
re
c
o
"
o

<
&H
e"
CJ

"g
U


CO





1
•£>
C
CO
CJ

















I
^
C
ro
^

CO
c
3
S3
1
TS
1
CO
CO
a
'E
3
1
S









w
u
^
ro
&
'u
tt,
bO


1
1




0
^

o
81
o- 1
§s
W QJ
1 1
J _ £,
JS §" 3 "So







§

permanent clean water supply is developed;
implementation of periodic sampling at
potentially affected homes; construction of a
new uncontaminated water supply to serve
affected and potentially affected homes and
businesses; and periodic sampling of residence;
outside the affected area



















c^
cl 1





























Q
^
o S
o O
ll tl
sS Ss
Recovery wells will operate until
concentrations of VCM, EDC, and
TCE reach 1 ug/1, 0.94 ug/1, and
2.7 ug/1, respectively, for two
consecutive sample analyses

Excavation and removal of contaminated soil
and sludges with offsite disposal; capping; GW
pumping and treatment; and alternate water
supply

•a
o
8
in
CN

w
•Z3 "S UH
° '>
f > 00
•a -a .S
C OJ T3
re —
^T C v
t/3 6 '
- 1 u
o 8 >
u

£j"
u


co rp
3s o? s
Q Q 0 r3


CO


o
o

||
s£
.si
2 ^
a a
ll
^ o
« J£
3 4J
C ~
CS JX
V in
~3 'C
$1
rr3




|
^
site boundary, and meet NPDES
requirements for SW discharge.
Individual GW cleanup levels
were not specified. Soil cleanup

Excavation and onsite incineration of
approximately 36,000 tons of contaminated so:
and waste from the Drum Disposal and Ridge
areas, followed by residual ash disposal offsite
grading, and revegetation of excavated areas;
removal and offsite disposal of surface debris

^
tf
l/> >^-/


J2
5I
O re
"^ •—
c E
!3 C
« 8
G
re
re
c/3 w


||
U CJ


CO





T3 of
c -5
£
fjlg
T3 ""I ° oo
C 1J~ ^ c
*"* C ffi •-•
t3 g S 3
>£"&._=

1
3
T3
c


•^ "O
(N 3










levels were based on acceptable
drinking water exposure levels
and include toluene 6,000 mg/kg,
c
from the Inert area, followed by capping;
construction of a RCRA cap over the Granthar
South area; GW pump and treatment with





T3

."fja co
C c C

•^ vi '£
•£"5 |
g 1-s




CO *CO
00 .C

cl 2










W
"o
1
ex
•a
c
CO
00
^
"So
"^
|e
^i tx
^ 0\
x -3-

offsite discharge; and GW monitoring

























•g
0 ^
o a
o O
lit 11
«a > 3
-------

















Record of Decision Summary Table
g
fe
S
S
E

















>
u "n
p c
£ *
c S
« 'S,
Is3












Components of













^^
el°
5 K Si
2 S 3
.ssl
5/1 #.!>
t^




s

s
0



s

u
o,
3
B
RJ
a


Selected Remedy
OJ
£
_3
"o
S
W
1



E
JU
3
1
>
1

c
_g
|

13
H
1
e
o
'&
ctf


8
in ^
s"l
in d.
in S
w -ii







"8
QJ
IG
1
M
I
Removal and consolidation of contaminated
sediment from the drainage ditch, drainage
•Q
B
ta
1



i/i
GO
fc
01
1



S3

oO
8.1
S e
ON e
S«a












s e
1 « 8
1 a^,
W CJ
bQ „ 0)
11 2
0. Q, D.
8=3 S
Itl
u 3 -0
•§ "-2
sl-
ip
" bo c
'| JH -a
§ ^1
•*- *o ™
? "w .5




s
•5 J£
O, a
s* w
.S E
12 T5
5 c
O CO
c .
— M
W3 CO
•IH
S-O
C C
O ro




W5




















100-year flooding event; and soil predesign
study to determine extent of excavation and
capping























§ «
0 |
8 8
3f&
M
«
-E |
8|

§5
^"S
bo S
» (0
'S- ^
•l|
cyT C
.3 Q,
1 P-
H «J
Removal, transportation, and offsite incineration
of liquid and sludge tank waste;

f
o
o
0 ^£
o" 5
8-S
bo *-j
C C
11
0. o.
S2"'5
•2 ST
C CJ
2 i
cn1 ej
bo 5
1 s.
~ T3
s §

^<
•5 ^
« -a"
_ra g
00 O
p .S2
Q Q

CO




^^
•g
1
"o3
x^t a"
3 E V
(U 03 O Q
sit5
Sf (0 3 0)
g g 0
A -S o j«
15 E o "t
1/1 a i-i 3
fe c -P §
£ § p u
TJ § 8 -S
a-S £ e
S X o °
.§3^ 2 g
ffi ~ o u
•a S c a
decontamination of tanks, piping, processing
equipment, and building materials; offsite
disposal of building rubble; selling of tanks and
other metal materials as scrap; offsite disposal


a1
a
S


- "p
•5 cw
•ti ca —
> (X)
S cS aj
-1-1 •-- W n
1 g^ E
§ &t"S
•g ° .s ™
S 3! .a"
e X TI ~a
8i.s£
bo
C bo
« c
>,•§
a 1
OH O
oj jx &
!•§!
5 S (2









o c $ •
c w o i
J2" S -S S- :
Illli
1 « gf 1
08 •« 'B '
sgi 5^
•S fc « wf
0 .s -S n .-
-a eg P V ,
» 4.3 M •*• t
C r- C5
:-si^
~ » P bb <
_s -g j g 4.
a 'J '
M -S 1) O V»
a f £ in f
of concrete, asphalt, and other materials; and
treatment of generated decontamination fluids,
as appropriate










"a
_
bo
B
^
_3
3


CO
00
*
^ T=
vd C
o cs








u W % S" JS 0
J * C '« .S "-
&!fi!S*
?!isii
3 — m ^ z v
s ^ E -5 g Si
•> !2 3 u 8 's
2 Jj 6 £ E Ei
« Q. ^ v** ..— (U
S* 4J S
S ° 2|^"5
2 S 4- S ^ &
s p 0.5 o E
3 ^ g < B S
id g = s " a
- « 
-------
—» c t! 'w 'g g o
5 b s oj '3 2 S co-
to i-i H .2 u e .S N
 •5 ..
1^  ^|



w" 'S J  § 1
•* >2. •«  vo -5.
O
    CO CJ

    y"o.s-s
I-
c rt .
 i | .c g" S J £ j»- .§•
|S'3'o^"S.gc
is^rr5-g-«
          I
             13
                        1
                        t/5

                        S
                        6  s
                        dj  O
                        ^  CO
                                  •C  «
                                  -0 •£ £?

                                 ?!li
                                 ill!

                                 sill
                                           °. _- s
™s  efu
>- s  P -y •§ ^
0-3  a" ara s
s I a11fe 3 E
Ililtfh
 •o
u- S

g^
« e
£ w

                                                lllll
                                      •o
                                      c
                                      (N
E
                                           ..
                                           QJ
                                           2  -s
                                           o  S
                                                   £

                                                   •s
                     333

-------
•8

          g'S.a-g'sBwS:5
          i a "3 & a s 13 'e S

          lilliilll
                            W

                           •o
                    0^-5?  8



                    111  S.

                   --
           t/5
             o p"i i i•§"§
             o > .S E .S co co
1  £
           U
   3

   •g
                                    TB
                                    tc
                                      o
                                      c to co a" 2

                                      §!£§§

                                      l-^llo

                                      c a a g y
                                      g -p g •= S
                                      fc C v ua a
                                         J2

                                         i
                                        u >
                                     1


                                     I
                                                   #§
                                                   X ™.
                                                J5


                                                I
                                               1
=«

u
CLJ



Is:
                                                 =

                                                N
                                     §1 £{j! §

                                     § i 3 s 2"°
                                     •g    «

                                     ^^S-5|I
                                                 o
                                                    c -a
                                                 8 5
                                                -I,

                                                g§
                                                 UJ

                                                 Q
                                                a
                                                o
                                                    §  2
                       334

-------
            £2


           1
           £-
 •B^l
  | £«
         $$£

           S-o jo
         _ c g
         C co O

         o ~'5
 •3TB J9
       o o

       STB
          m  y
     S £ S £ 8

             8
     So w <5 to
 al a-51-2


 |'S^Ig?


 i'feillSl
s'5

I"S«
^ TO ^


i'1-8
(N -2--0
         TO
         00
o g

§J
vO O
5   "^       c
'5   TO £     ^ jg

"S   <" 'S •§" ? "" '5
Sg>g&iS.s^

I I I o^a:-i S
EaS^ Q.u2..

Od^el

8 - | °=5| »!
«   I
o
tt

S!
re
     1
         Ov


         §



         I
                      "So
                      0*6
                      , .- U5
                      Is
                      01  E Ti

                     'c  3 .S
                     •o ^-v 11



                     111
                             ja
                             cu
                            - "o
                           83
                                V   jj
                                         o
                                         o
                                         O ^-N


                                         of!
                                                  to
                                                  3

                                                  C
                                             -5 B S
                                         o
                                          JJ



                                          'I
                                        > C X T3

                                        5 8i S
                                        c
                                        •a
                                        c

                                        ^3
                                        S
                                        S
                                       '£
                                    52   w
                                    o   »-<
                           335

-------
-S3
       1
       o
       sl-a
       •a E
8s
tv O
of£
R.I
l/) O
                                                  8
               a
               a
               •s
                                                                     !
                                       •HI SI
                                       u S
                                       |S g-
              rs  co
               0  \   w
               w  ro   «
              fc,  O   1-1

Si <   S   o?   c
K tf   So   cs
                         I   I   s
                                   336

-------
o

o.
3
e

8
u
05
         '2
          '5.
o -s
s  1
        8
       •a
        e
        ra
                             c S


                            Jl
                            •S <-"
         ^  CO

         O  bO*ra
         c  c 5


         a '§ «
         u  " E

         Ji  S E
         HI  ^ ^
                       •s
                              -
                        a O « 8

                        a -8 I e |
                        8.
                        o
                          .

                       I?
                       S T3
                       C K
                       O —
                   2
                       2
         2
                             •p.S
                              53 TJ
                                            s 3

                                            §il
I    i
                                                                   s  § §
                                                                   w -a o
                                                    1



                                                    1
                                                     (A



                                                    1
                                                                       •a

                                                                     •S  S


                                                                     '*  tf
                                                    -



                                                    IP
                                                                   S!

                                                                   1

                                                                     a"
                                         337

-------













jjj
•rt
1 Record of Decision Summary 1
M
1

E












*? — - 03
& "O i2
:> G S
IIs
&



3
D.
3
I
a





Components of
Selected Remedy
V
E
3
1
&
CO




Threat/Problerr

||

ill!
•* a
c
_o
fp
a.
-

o *
282 s 5 ^
T. fl P °* y> S
m i2 § «•> K 3
w^S w£3

" §i 60
2 ^A "
illif
1 1 .s | S
Ji'b •« S &
a-"1 Si .a a
3 U _ c §
i -a § & g
•3 -2 ;o g J
iiili
60
If -L ll^l

^^il 111 a 1 !•§
SlfilUliila'
•s 1 1 ° § i 1 11 « ^ 'g
i§j°5§i|||°|
SSf^ll^Sl^li
^!illH?il-
lllll^Iilll^
S-gSsgjig^fc^"™
C .2 -a 5 u TJ o _- .."g 5 ;.-
igtl8Sl!»l3ffa-a
S •? s -S i 'S s 1 K l f §
.§e><3£lSwraS"6o
•if--ujSugeig'Si5-2§J
S^^SS'SgilS^gS

w
o
8
CO"
1—1
QJ
S
o ^

a • c* u ^
CU £ /~ (.
"S a a §
lilfg
w 2 H S
~ c c T; c
$ 8 8 .s X

T3 a
C 'M
ro n)
1 < 1 S
U > tS "
< = •§ " -
53 1 S 42

m

S
(O<
l« ^
ll 11
« S 2" |
W ^ V>^s

•g
If1
|as
•"* CN *o
u •-< e
>2 ° "
BN
ll|f
a u ° y
Bo-S c »
illS




Permanent relocation of residents

1
U
O

1
(S
c
.5 60
Dwellings contam
with radioactive
materials includin
radium


g
£ c in
So eo
o 'a S
T3 ra g
11 1 S

fO



i 1 ^
HI If
" ^

•5
§S'§
"^ B — •
I^J
i- -• e
v2 0 «
S|£
H§§
5o-S e "•
Ills

8
o
J
Demolition and offsite disposal of tw
and excavation and offsite disposal o
contaminated soil

1
1
o
Z


— j" ™
Dwellings and soi
contaminated witl
radioactive materi
including radium


£
ii I
il 1 ,
rd ^5 O^ C
J CC o es

CO

2

8 ^ O
It |i
r/K ^^ f» ^^
•S*
T3.a
si
^ g -S -
"7u co o w
I-S3 g g
!3 j§ J'|
f "i -1 §P
u j5 3 c
»g8-P
s2 E .sa S

1

1 S'l
Excavation, consolidation, and anaen
biodegradation of contaminated soil;
removal and offsite disposal of conta
debris


f
s
co"


_e
Soil and debris
contaminated wit]
pesticides
oT
-a
'u
•a
sc
c §
1 £
I) > \
3% 8

CO




r- 1
U
























1
to



                                              
-------
Ijl
|.f S



1
o
Q.
3
E
U





•»

Components of
Selected Remedy
1
3
1
V
tn
ro



Threat/Problem
s?§

C p, Q Jj
K 5S .1 §
V3 ^
E
O
'So
50 mg/k
0
^ "re O
« o tu
*^3 &1 *"•
ra^l^
G [« t>o .0 §
*^ *o .S S ?
Excavation and removal of cor
transformers, and debris with <
soil; demolition of onsite build
backfilling, grading, and vegeti
minimize erosion and control i
1

I

o
Z
.c
'S
Soil contaminated
VOCs and PCBs
o"
•g

S S3 1
-E if E
_60 J^ ,
QJ CN to
»-J O T— '


CO
o JSS
00 *)
it Si



Not specified





.1°

1
•a
c
1
•a
2
bo
.E
1
E
'S.
O.
"8
S
'§.
CA
O
Z
•8
*-< fto
CO e
•o E .E -a
E •= -a E
Q B 3 a
£- 1 ! Pj
5~ c O "S
0 i > *-i



1 !
CU 00
li i s


CO
8 1
<==• E
r-T M C _
VO .tj M Q
O D. ^ <
S -§• § O
E V -S
•S a !„
Q — & 60
1 U S s
Soil excavation will be b
visible contamination.
Carcinogens will be treal
ug/kg for individual
contaminants, which cor
to the 10"4 to 10"* risk n
60
C
'£>
•n a
•S .E

3 "M
E .S *t!
W!a °
" o ^3
Excavation of carbon waste pil
soil with transportation to an <
incineration facility and dispos
RCRA landfill

JU
'rs'ui'

K i 1
oo £> a
£
I PL]
Soil contaminated
VOCs including PC
and TCE; other
organics including
PCBs; and metals
including lead
6 S

""D tS
E <£ _
-1 ! !
> C 3 CO
••*• C x) ^
S 3 £ o


CO
^^
80 i°
1! 11



"8
•»
t-i
1

Extension of existing municipa
affected residents
"8
>a
I
(A
O
Z


•S
a'S'l
Illi
jg C M *g
lill
2

_E
J2 ft co "c3
* "3. °° .E


CO
Q S
1/^2 28
If S



1
1
0
oj "«
CO Jv

"e u '§
3 .a .g
L? O 5 W
Cleaning and removal of unde:
storage tanks; excavation and
visibly contaminated soil; and
analytical results of soil analys
1

1
M
0
z
.§
«
GW and soil
contaminated with
organics and inorg


<
p-
5 cS
1 1
1 i


CO
339

-------
|
o
5
c
CJ
£






























flj (L?
E g;
sf



TJ
E
ra
3
0.
(3


















a

u
S

°





w
g
o
ex
i
u








*^_
Components of
Selected Remed]










^
1
Signature






OJ
S
3
1
£j
«
Threat/Problem
E
1
Remedial
E
'BO
&


§
o~
co_



*a
8.
„
o
*
1
i
•a
1
3
a
c
o
V
•S
,
o
• £3
•5
S
1
•a
E
ra
1
I

"S
c
1
t/s
o
1
•a
c
ra
1"
o
ra
1
McAdoo A

CO



/-^v
3
'B,




o
E
3
1
•a
8
1
U
1



"S
J-J
'e
•"^
> n
contaminated soil
-a
B
ra
wT
J3
V
•a






contaminated with


g









•a
ra
BO
"Sb
3


|
|
u
BO


^
^
C/J
BO
B
'B.
ex
S
I
**•
Q
B
O
•a
ra
S
X
QJ






1
«r
BO
E
a








o
**- •*
J>
g







^
CO
CO
V
^
1








BO
I
•a
B
a
1
1






solvents, metallic


06/28/85





=•
^
5
S
ex




























E
ra
s
ra
•o
E
m
T3
_3
"w










































































caustic liquids, toluene,
waste oil/water, and


•g
CN











































S
1
•a
1






                             8§i
.    s

 1
I
o
I
k4

.£
I
•O
3 Q

S S
                  3

               JS 'C
               a
             |11


             III
             JD § S

             O « H
III
             •s
             > UJ

             It

             11.
               > ra
                   -o
                  BO 3 B
                  -^   a
                             •3
                'S
                t/5
                                   _


                                   BO
                                   3
                                   •a
                                   B
                 O  «.S c?

                 §.slS

                •g-SB
                S
b j= .S a
jj .a ex > g



° S = g «

1 ^ S- i §
™ g E S -a

g e -s 11
•a ra 3 g g

ra « ^ E"5
S "a U > o
x c ? > o
W 3 C UJ CB
                             ex
g


Q


Ql   00
C   \
L-I   r^*
o   o
                                     O
                                                 "8
                                                 ia

                                                 1
                                                 (S
                                                 T3
                                     I  I
                                     lls
           340

-------
Components of
Selected Remedy
.
         o
         OJ

         I
        H   —
foi
e,
   u
   J4
 •a I
 •S *
s
te
criterion of 4.4 mg/1 whi
based on an average dail
of 0.125 mg/kg/day of tri
(2-chloropropyl) -phosphat
                                       •
                                       IBS S
Natural attenuation; GW, SW, and sedimen
monitoring; and implementation of institutil
controls restricting further well installation
the shallow aquifer
                       1
Consolida
applicatio
excavatio
area and
sediment
ding and getation
surface manament tec
and sediment ontrol in
ambient air and post-tre
gra
           1
                       I
                                       .*  1?
           -  s    fl
           S § 1 S 1 g
                   _   "
                   S   1
            a i1  ~  c
                   s    s
v. "£   ?  .S
a oo   ^  fe
E .C   M  i
si   I  2
                              341

-------
.
k
*

e




























cj-
E
S
s
[73



>
2 -a a
5 C 2
u S £•*
£^5^
js 2 % E
S <
LO
CO ^
CO 13
to" g

"O
c
w £ N.J2 «
C -^ C 2 u
Ji ? =6 u '5
E _ 3 E cj
• 3 ^ "^ K ?5
-O CJ Tj ._ C
8 ™ .S 1 ™
•a .S M ra g1
C K <•> • - .5
« § 'S h3 -a
nilii
^ s ^
S s -a 9
| « 3 S
M a |
li 1 t I
| | E ?j S
o5 6 cl S

CO

0
E
S g
S °
f~ e
E o
- 3 „ _, xD
•a S 1 g^ 1 a
S^2^™-iE^
Mis:* •§ -s!
k-"-°— 5B_
.p9K«,o
t: « § ^ d a" ^ •§
S^^S^tJfSg
s|a^||,,--S.
beEnCcxico,
Cm • ° u "" ' u ™
• M "^ O ^ P O ™
•S S2>-6>&U
S^^^a^s-gb
«,"2 4?o y"jjo-5-;?
ffl3o.-™si'w;>
s •§ &i>^s bg
l/l.SBr-lSCN-oS
Onsite installation of concrete pad with berms
to mix offsite sewage sludge and fly ash;
application of lime (10 tons/acre) and potash
(80 Ibs/acre) on target areas; application of fly
ash and offsite sludge on target areas; and
application of grass seed, seedlings, and mulch
"8
tn
1
CA
0
Z
B
s
§ -a 3
3 co u-
O cj ^
E "™ ^
u- o"-a
o .c c
— N CO
•s | E"
« g 3 Oj
^2 C3 -p T3
l-sll
Q B 3 -o
<
d.
cj"
C
N
§ «
S ^
e o
CO O t«
d. O T^

CO

o S 4) _ .2?
s.iiii
Sllill
^? a, S ,2? «J = o
A v_y ? C TD 13 («
1
J2 T3 w
41 c 13
~^l
C C T3
5 Ji c Si
E E 3 b
i K 8 5
S '=^42
•^ JT u nj
s ^5 §> -S
2 < > - S
l^ljl 1
IIIll 1
Slope modification, capping, and application of
a vegetation cover on the residue bank;
construction of SW diversion channels;
SW/leachate collection and treatment using
lime-activated filtration lagoons and/or
constructed wetlands; implementation of an
inspection, monitoring, and maintenance plan;
and wetlands restorative measures, if necessary
No further action
!_l
ii
o 13 _«J
°. E 9 3
g -s jg I1 5

W w y 72 *j *5
t-~ g 2 $ o a
CN a Q. £ Z CO
t/2
•a „ "O
c -S S
18 -5 M "
& •« 'S "ra"
o si "3 i
- CO CJ
S .S .E E
S E « .3
Ulii i
on u c u N z
2 ^
.1 I *
N £ o3 
-------
o
o
o
 §" c-

 •I
23
.1 .§•
11 •a .1 § c
i=l «ll
i g •§ | f j
! P c S TR S
 &i ^i-s
• -—,   ?
oo -c-
      .O  CJ
      g'S-S
  |..r
  ^ QJ -rt
  •a •£ .2
  2i o u "
c 's ra .y
ro ffl -«5 C



     &^
     I
     •
       oo
       c
            Ov
            00
                  §
                  •a
                  2
                OJ
                c
                o
                                 •a
                               o
U B la .
_-S 2
                               C
                               a

                               1
                                                 •8
                                                 e
                                                 1
                                               o
                     t-^

                     I
                     «
                     ^   S
                        343

-------
 o
  c_
  3
II
   O
  'Bo
       ill
          S-s
        •8
        is
o
          a
        •S-S-g
= c 8
o o •-•
* u C


K a o J2
t>- •- -S S
5 -5 3 S
5 S S E
        u
         .
        •o
          8   &   %
          in   o   1-1
                                            11   si
                                            SI   II
                        a ^ e 2
                        ™ § w •£  -a
                      .8 g I ^ 8   §
                       g -g > u " > 8.
                       ° *g b8i- g 3 a
                       ffclll'S'S
                      •a's s * g « o

                       - s ^^^,-S-s
                       c K 5 s »~s *>
                     o   c
                     8 S I

                     S Si
                     i-i w^ wi
J-'C
c -o
l-s

1 "S
« n

IB
                           il
                        i
                            1
                            E
                                                "w n
                                     o
s » ™
•p .S (T
s TS e
%3 S

1M
2 rt ,,r

                                               Q.
                                    344

-------
  8
  u
  o.
  3

  §
  u
•0-5
is
II
           .S
            -

        |

        !
         o
        .
        •a
        S
          j= y
          .tt H
           5 «,
         8 | ~ S



         U5 O > «
        I
                          s
                          'B.
                          S
                          •a
                          1C
                          u
                           3
                           C


                          .1


                           S!
                           \-,  bO
                           V  C
                          •S 'c
                           is
                          "-  5

                          II
                          •a
                          •i.  -
                          ><  X
                          ,W   CO
                          E-   o
                                        m-'S.
                                      in m g   rt
                                      t, «A o.   a.
                                        T3
                                        B
                                        ra
                                        Q.
                                      a e

                                      I &
                                      •a .5
                                      C Q,
                                      « S
                                      a 5

                                      |-a
                                      5 a
                                      c -a „
                                      O B S
                                      •a TS g
                                          60 ,


                                        "8 '-3 '
°°" 3   8_ 1
                                                                    ».
                                                              o
                                                              o
                                                                          113111
              S's"B
            1 u « «
            s a-a S
            60.C ™ "
            •I £"8 o
            |a^^
            S.511
                                                                      S3   > c "3 .
                                                                      13   O tO Q. ".
                                                                         1
                                                                         •fi S „-
                                                                         •
                                                                          |"§| SB
                                                                         O > «"
                                     345

-------
I
        u 3.S S feL-S
        o
         i -^
        .O CQ




        J! 2
                                   I
                                   8
                                   •S
                                   •s
                                   co -5
                                  •a
                                     c nJ
                                     l-s
       §1
       m o,
                                                        o ^
                                                        8s
                                                   "8
                                                   tc
                                                   1
       111.18-
       is-SS S.
                                                   o
                                  .
-SI
js g

1 =
E co
       •a ra
         «?
          . 8


       111

       "
                                   1
                                   e
00
00
                                               u
                                           vO   01
                                           O   rH
ra
c
S
                    £ S * -a
                    u u u e
                                                                  "SS
,J CO CO

  II
  g 8
  8 s
    .
    "8
    «
•II
'E? a
> g
II
5 o
                                346

-------








V
1
s/5
1
ts
!
£
£
i
&

















e -o a
peg
& ™8
sis
QJ £^ ^W
(S
J2
a.
3
C
U



Components of
Selected Remedy
£
e
1

c -a
QJ CU
.i 2
Soil, sed
contamil
4
a O
'IS
'&s
> g
II
5 0


CO



c
i
GW cleanup goals were provided
for six contaminants including

~a
c
treatment with discharge to SW; purchase la
construct a soil cover over the contaminated





13
_
T3
C
CO

.§
CO
e
nitroaro




1





8_
£f
cs O
(A Ci-
1
o
IS)
H

iS

area, and incorporate land into existing wild!
preserve












£•
'0
&
1 1
J 1










•a
CU
Area 2 - Relocation of ponds 1 and 2, follow
by backfilling with clean fill; and GW pump
and treatment with discharge to SW















"co
c
E
-a
e
(N












Area 3 - Installation of a soil cover; and GW
pump and treatment with discharge to SW






















§/_^ *?
co 5g
3 -a S
|s g
Soil will be excavated to a 10"4
cancer-risk level for contaminants
present onsite, which is consistent
with the 10'* risk level for GW



Excavation and offsite incineration of tar
deposits; backfilling with clean soil; and GW
verification study


r«l
"R
0
tx
g-B
* £
•§•&
ro bo
C C
'i Is
CO CO va
c c 3
o o ?
u u a,
S3 K T3
^2 g
<
OH

CU
'^ VO «
cu oo e
^ 5} E
2 ° :
& & £


CO


Is
'a
S,
g
The remedy meets the
8.93xlO"5 increased cancer-risk

"O
r"
No action with continued GW monitoring; ai
implementation of institutional controls to

"8
(S
1
o
Z
£
1
"8
™ *?
c S
'5 "^
c 3
2 -0
c c
8 a
^ o
o >


s
iT
c
1


CO





level. Natural attenuation can
meet the MCL for benzene 5 ug/1
within a 5 to 10 year period.



prevent the addition of new drinking water
wells





.8
E
ro
e?
o
•a
c

benzene
I

S
|£
^1
5£








Additionally, WQC and standards
have not been exceeded



















00 1
1 E
§ 1
O IN





1? I
n &
$ 5 o
w -ii «»
This interim remedial action will
comply with ARARs; however,
chemical-specific cleanup levels
were not provided
 co co
< £
OH "
U
of ra
u OJ U-
£'! 1 s
i 2 i £
2.2 ^ ^ „
$ 3 S % £


CO

347

-------
 U
  ,

"8T3

S I

I*
I "8
Is
                   •?s  a  -3
sll
        §"§ 2 EP

      illzf^ff-s

      !la  111
      9 o P S •>, a a
      t/5 u > J5 x .E E
Q  i> -

_-  .2 E

s  si
•a  3 «
E  -a J

JS  c —

«  71 S.
re  C -n
u  u .s
of drums and

I
.—
*o
1
re
1
i

T3
drum contents with offsi
or incineration, if

3
o
•s
S
s
1
60
E
B
1
3
•a

3
hazardous; grading, soil
•eplacement of two
M
»
of direct contact risk are
o
jT
V
rr
t2
o
domestic wells adjacent
controls including

1
.9
2
1
00
•c
Q


B
O
•a
1
E
JS
•a
E
re
1
•a"
i
00
B
•a
re
1
i
i
E
00
'E
1
00
E
•a
B
01
"a.
a
'w
C
O
constructing a new pond
i
00

3
institutional controls incl
00
c
'C
o
'c
restrictions; and GW mo

             ^ -S  E
             o'S g>|


             i?ii

             sll"5
             a i « .a

             I 1 s S
             s ° c £
             W U C O3
             I  a
          ^2  <:
                •: O  r?

                CS ft  r-l
                                o
                                o
                                o

                                       4J tx

                                     :  -S S


                                     ^^^
                                     °^i
                                        8S
                                § ™ -g


                                111
                                  -
                                II
I
                                         O ,-N
                                         O S

                                         °- s
                                               o 3
                                               s^ T1
                                                         O «
                                            3
                                            •a
                                                    C

                                                    3
                           348

-------
 l

il
 *8
   o
   Q.

   i
   a
£
                    -1-
                    O rc X ~
                    «  . 60 C
                      E 3
        -.2 % 

         *s
         a P
         (3 I


         •8
        .5 Si

        S

                  If   1
                  1!  1!
             !
      re x2
      ^•5^

        1  1
05/18/88


1st - Final
                           11
                  I8
                  l!
                  u o
                           o

                            ^
                  E re

                  11
                  5Itf-a


                       S

                           is
                           l-s
                           §.s
                           S 3
                                    §|
                                    •o £
                      811
                      *o w re
                      C CO "•"

                      C CO K
                      O e U

                      11?
                      re ^ .5
                      IN 8
                      w a o

                                   •S
                                   5


                                 / \


                                 °
                                  d
                                  O
                            349

-------
e -o a
| g 8
sis
K eurfj
|ao

"§
o
o
ex
3
I
U

Components of
Selected Remedy
I u
! 1

' "5
1 >
i a
4 CO



E
^
(X
'cO

£


^ c
*X rtl *^
E" 6.P %
n £? OJ
2 C fa IS
.sSfi
a a « £
•« s
c
o
'Eb
o
o"
o
o


towards
I
CO

!>s
9l

^
^
"O '>
C >
(0 "U
uT *-;
-o .5
0) g
"°.I
c/5 cj

c£
6
S
Amnicola
TN


*
S
O ^S
O Q
§ §£
M "O
^ §|

total cPAHs. GW
including chlorofo
chromium 890 ug/
use restrictions
„
fixation and onsite disposal; GW monitoring;
conducting a public health assessment five yea
after completion; and imposing institutional
controls including land and GW use restriction



r*i ^^
!>!
85
5
S 0°
.S
.E "§
11
(J ° —
C E/I
'« 2 1
Q oj .2
•| E E
O CO CJ

To
o
&
S
Is































03/30/89



350

-------
ill
1
tA


1

3

§
u >
f

PJ
S.u^
                                                               5 e
                                 vi 
-------
II
8.1
  «
  §
 I
      1
       c .5 c
      •= T3 —

       3 "w "«
      O > a £
H.
                       o
O > (3 .S B
                                    1 S |
                                    «t, e
                                    P 2 a
    **s
     ^t u
     o "*

     °°- "«
o -e-E u S ja"
it g51Ji
w ^ S > a o D. i
                                    v &   a
                                    1?   S
                                    fQ U   M
                                 S   3l^  I
                      g
                      ^
                         1
                            352

-------
a
a
3

i
a
         !   i
         H O E__
           '8
              «- Si -2
; aS g^ e°S §>.£?«!
I -3 O B s-   Q, X •*
 1 XH CTlwTITS^
                                      -
                                 ..5 re v
                                              3


                                              f
                           ig-e.-g-S.sfa  -8.1

                           SS111I3  M
                                                I S
                                               .
                                             I "S g 1 « i

                                             MIS**
                                             8 •« S s ;c ••§
                                               c
                                               re
                                               S

1* 1
§1  S
                                                       §  2
                         353

-------
t- "O £3
O C S3
> ^ o
QJ DM d(
£3





—
0
0.
c

u




Components of
Selected Remedy



V
:E
3
—

:M
w
5

Threat/Problem
fc.!
c Q. Q ^
^ >s ^
2 X 3 5


"^ c/3 bb 6
K ^
c
_g
*5o
I
,
§o
§ /_x §
o o .t; o
O 00 O. *-*
ro" co" 8 o
1*
c "S S
flj cO — ^ ^*
n « 1 'J to
n >< ~™ .£ W
y w ° Q
60 _ IS f °
'3 1 3 ^ "H
'5 60 " ^ -S
1 \^ 1" a
1 o 1 -g to |
^^115
V
60

C 0
f PCP contaminated soil and
li onsite incineration; backfil
minated soil; GW recovery, s
possible onsite GW treatmer
adsorption with discharge t(
O .ti 2 ia c
is ill
>< QJ *> C *t/3 3
U4 w > cQ 3 vj



\
8
o
oT
c
GW, soil, and sedim(
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCP, and
metals including
chromium
vT
§
W —
\O eg
C 00 .C


^ \ '
O 0? ft
U o £


^
§
o o ?8
o o _ O
° ° -~* o —
BBS °- S
§ ° 5, o g
co co S •-! n
c
5 S
Ji ">
Sj -g
4J ^ U
^ C £
w u .f2
& to >-
^ * u
S n I
Q.!S
-------
"S T3 i2
o e ss
S ™ ,9
> CJ
gig
&
Cleanup Goals




•^
Components of
Selected Remedy






V
E
3
1
a
S
>
?


E
_OJ
2
s
d.
^

(Q
Si

v^§
 n «3 ^
ns *-5 ^ S
u e o y
X S 5 W
w u J5 c




«
•R

Q

vO
T3
CO
JS
4_- -C
||
"S a
(A tfl
c
"i E
jo g
1 8
S
[/) K
•5 <
^ —
T= 00 CO
•53 .2 oo e
1 » S S
1 3 5
E 1 1 2


•*

1
» ^
10 m ^^
CO C? vO ti
^2 « S /-N
S '& Sal
S^ sao
Pond water dilution will meet
Ambient Water Quality Criteria


a
ro
S-o
1 s
a °- &•
>f sediment with onsi;
i; RCRA site closure;
i discharge to tributa
controls
o -a -a
c -a 'g S
o ra * a
•a TJ |- .2
nj "^ 5 a
> "P -2 2
8 8 S|
a 8 -3 .1




<*i
"R
O
o
\o

"


-s
^ '5
C •— T3
e ^ S
c 4-1 ro
.5 ra w
•o c w w
lel'l
•gl-S &
Is 8.1
yT
TD
C
O
p-t ^_
^, \O W
^ w c
? £ £
— M '
sis


1-

•g
Q

^v ^, ^i O ^
tv CO g o CM g ^
S S 8 t fe Sfi S
Sfeal S^o
Specified preliminary goals for
soil based on MCLs to include
lead 166.5 mg/kg, chromium 3.7
mg/kg, benzene 14.4 mg/kg,
trans-l,2-dichloroethylene 76.0
ug/kg, toluene 971.0 ug/kg, and
PCB (Aroclor 1254) 1,050 ug/kg.
GW will attain the cumulative
10"s cancer-risk level which
includes MCL values for benzene
5.0 ug/1, toluene 175.0 ug/1, and
lead 50.0 ug/1
~ T3
3 g^
U-4 _, -5
O J2 too-—
^ c ^
u -5 .5 ?
C 5 T3 ij
S-s&S
 ?. u
'g "S I e° E?
S 5 E -I ™
8-2-3 £|
32.2 8=5



fi O
•5. 8
o o"
0 O
CO O yl
rx" f-f 13
r-i VO 60


•a
JS C
i—1 ro
? w vT
„ U Q3
S TB "2 y
""* J ITt p
O ra hi)
C w bo
"S 1 ° -E „
!|d = l
3 8 g .1 I
§


S
J=i CO
OJ ^
60 M
Sbi £ 2


T)-

1
vO *

« § i 1 —
i— i .— oo s i—
tN o. ,(.- S 2
«" S ^o.??
w» >ii «A vS^Cj
Soil will be excavated to the
10"4 health-based risk level which
includes lead 100.0 mg/kg. GW
treatment will attain MCLs for
VOC contamination which include
1,1-dichloroethane 5.0 ug/1,
methylene chloride 5.0 ug/1,
trans-l,2-dichloroethylene 70.0
ug/1, tetrachloroethylene 3.0 ug/1,
toluene 340.0 ug/1, and
trichloroethylene 3.0 ug/1
V, D
60 "•*
~m *r-1 60 ^
2 — >• ?P BS
«j TI 3 > .E °
| H "S U | "3
>iii;i
§9,= a « -a
.l,85ls
C a"Rgs ^
M 8 ^ ^ I
o 0 m n 0 -g
!.-§ ° «r=3
c 5 e "m c n
-^ =§ •= 1 i 1
s s i -1 1 *§
N. •ri ™ "Q D
^1 ^^ fa-S
•s i u 1 -g -s
s| a iS §;;
— 1 -S ° n. ?
^ a &-s at
*-i o ra *c 3 1;
C/3 0 0 ? D.T3


J2
ra
n 60
1L o
X 0
§o
in °
"I 0



w-s
.c U 2
*3 L_i BJ
3 «E
^l|l
U cc .2
e ^ *
"S 1 % y
OS CO M S
= E §•§
cX 8 > ra
_:
u-

m lv "«
O 00 C
U ^ E
T3 rH I
S 1 2


Tf

355

-------
of
edy
Compon
Selected
•R
£
             c
            *S
    SfS
       •g
       ra
               V o
               8 "

     g  2

.sssksiss-ss

       E
    ' 0 .2 E o
    v-< 73 _3 a •
          efS-S
     e T3 .5 3
       1 2
E 5£
    S
    8
S85ISJ
     , I fl s ™ |
         o   a j§
         ^ 'a  ^ §
        . CQ '5!  1-1 J
                    :=-  I
                    r a  i-/
                    :t  S:
                    • S
                          0   „. o  s     u«   u1?
                          °£? 2-  «=C?  Or="   •=«
                          S.§ si  af  slg  ilg
                        i ii II  gi  an  In
                           S
                  M!
                  li!\
                  S B «-S
                      Ji
                  ; rs |
                  5^.^-S
                  >ls|
                      £
                      £b
                      o K
                       i!
                       ST?
                       4-1 (Q
                       * ..
                       w OJ
                       e »-
                  6E
                  1 =
                  g JS
                  e-Q
                  S u J2
                  s-sg
                  > J2 C
                  u5 8
                       "S
                       tc

                       o
                       O > !3
               .E  eg--
               fc  .. S
                          _ "O t/5


                          ill
                          — ^ W
                          i-?a
                          J2 fe 5
                          8 ^^
                          "8 ff
                          §> a
                          io e
                          J§^Q
                          "•s a
                          ^ e 2
                          O O 
                                 B
                                          E ^~
                                         a BO s
                                         w js t;
                                         1
                                    Ill
         IB -
         rt nj rs
         sll
                                     I
                                 2  la
                                        i
                                        01
                          356

-------



















41
3
.2
~

' Decision Summary
"8
Record
S
§2

(N
i
£












C T3 £3
O C ^
1 SC§
|l|
cu






(A
"§
O
U
0.
3
C

U








Components of
Selected Remedy


V
E
3
o
£
s
&


E
u
3
Threat/Pro

^£§
«r «> ffl 3
lla*
™ iC1 U
2 oJ 3 -"2
S3 a |) E
V3 £
C
O
'5b
&
'
1 o « IT?
°" °" S -? 1
0 ° 5= -S »s ~
u\ in^ i) C So
V» Wi «» £? J O »J
4j ^ C
2 w ^ ^ .9
C <• OJ C *-J
u a S & a j2 §
ss « 2 cs 3 - 8 E
3« Q^S^MXiS
•S "i *a2'S^.--2
S g S 3
|& "1-8
Z. 01 r-.v2.T3

•S T3
'5 > C
5 > ra
V 0 £ -
S so -a •> BO g
M c c * c .2
.E T3 ffl "O T3 E
E 2 w- ffl 3 -a
| = | 5 c c S
§ » 1 •« B « .a"
§11 *il!l
Oeu c^oEn^i
=" & 2?
3 •= .S
2 ^ Ti P
4-1 CO OJ 1C
c S - E j 12
1 i s J Si ! s
8 =>3£?oj^
& 3ro'Sati«
I« 2 i 1 3S ^ 1 s

•* •*
s
0 ??
1- s°
g" 2 3 §
« 'S. 55 E
sfs si
^
o
E
&

•p
X
I
(U tt
I-3
•" eo
^1
ai
< E
"e3 *o

S* i™, tu . «
^3 "S §
"
S S "w
-i § B
> .E P •-
^ Irfl
o 8 >.E
__-
CH
•g
5
S S S
| s° s
1^ 1 I

•*

§ ^
S"l
in a.
sS








-s

1
0
z.
c
_o
M
? ™
C o
ra £
.. 
-------
c-o a
O c g
*Hl (^

1
O.
3
C
ra
U





-•£
1 §
| B!
a|



Volume
t/3
ra
E
2
E
OH
JS
ll
sll
c
o
'So
&
• / — \
II 1
Illlll
- ~ tM (i Ui n
5 8 3. E si
» "
8s
1 a^
ill
I-
•S
'B
_ _0 w
« g s
13 01 u
a-E -s
03 C vu.
|ll
ill
— Co
1 1 1
•> QJ fS
111
»^
o
o
00_
-C
i!
11
2! 1 I
ll S a
S W 0 r2

*
go | o||
|| a 1 1 s § | .§ g s
2 8 -a | g f S S 2 8 "§
« « s y S. S "S2a2
(AWO.ES? (A>-StS«S?























o

m
                    "> c
             S % S
                 S5 — J5
                   P S
                 *? c d
        c-g-3
                   "• £J  « S yj ^«
                    ..«  «> o h |
             l§
             S, ">
                '.hJa

                i :s-
                : .E -a e
       js -5 e ^

        ^ii &-
          LH
                       E -a
                       V ra
•a Hr S SS-s
  C> c _, t- .« 5
  ^ QJ t* Q pa CD
o o e °3  >
**3 *O g _ ^T ? ^


2 a S § I

S g. g,| I
             "8
             (C
             o
                            _ Q
                          01 S 5.

                          •S 5 2
C
dJ
1
T3
C
1
o
"O
c
ro

0
2
01
1


•|
^
S
'e
ra
8







1
o>


CO

•3
3
.1
i



u
2
c"
o
•a
1
01
c
01
3
2
u"
^
V
c
1








JU
2
OJ
•g
03
S
£
"g-
•a
c
03




c
S

!5
1

E
1
S
J3
00
_c
13






















00
00
CO
             J5 j: o   ;:
             2 U U   £
358

-------
  u
as
         a  «

         nBo'5

        P 8 ^ w1
        ! - 2 °
       1.1

2 c S o

3   T3 C
6 c e .o


^K '13  ^

  E E •-

o 2 S 3
              §
           O G
           '
       8
       I
       I  i  S
                   qj    Pi

                   CO CO "ffl "O

                   E e o S

                   a ° ° BO


                   fe 2 v "So

                   *.S-ca

                   S y « °
                     c3 ^ *""*
                   4-J"   £ O
                   B .g S £
                   cy to  ^




                   ft 3 gj *^ 5?
                    „ C  3 C


                   'S ™0 "5 1
                   1/5 "y t-i .5 1-1
                   "8        BO

                   I      "S'E

                   i^>.iii

                   If si-S §
                   O ° T3 N ., C

                   15 "S § 5 S «
                   •a ™^5 Re

                   III "=5 8.
                   .52 co m   w fij
1|| || §"5


.2 " 'B .1 'o 1 ^
" -a g -3 •*• ™ c


S — •« -^ 2 -S oT

s i J1 i E -a
                             "S.S-C
                               W5 OJ
                             o t« a
                                 a.


                                 0"
                            t/3

                            2
                   •S -d  -s
                   o -x  £
                                ,.§•  i
                             \  W

                             8  ^2
                                                           s .g   "- s
                                                           s-&  s g

                                           1
                                           c .S -a
                                           •s -a c
                                           E 3 n
                                           2 T! -
                                           c c w
                                           5 •= y
                                           u u; &
                                           O
                                           -£ t-
                                           oo _-
                                     : x •" c

                                     1581"

                                iJliilP
                                1 "si"SiI p§
                                u5 ja .5 re S .E o m
                                   BO



                                 v fo 2 „ =3
                                 *3 ~  AI 2l Hr
                                                                bi S
                                                           1ii!i!
                                                           | § § g .5 o
                                                           5 -rr ^, c2 O wa
                                                   •s « S g -a.
                                                   5 .s a 1 i
                                                   c
-------
 J3

 g
 O

 D.
 3
 C
I
§|  i|

S3  si

a
CO



O

"8
M
_e

o,
       CJ

       3
      n
      o
      •a
      co J2

      ||


      l-s

      S's
      §5
              51  §
              N -
              §
              I
                   o. S   .

                        1


        £»J  O
        u.  o
                                  =1
                                  '
                                  I-a

                                  ^d
                                  U S
                                   •g
•si-s
""S3

Si!

in
iii
                .a
               "£3 "O -3 _t«


               111!
               W O 13 0
          H3 -S M w
          S'Sll
          •« -P 5 S

          sill
               5 8
             13 OT

               -
                                     ,
                              l§'g
                              §tE
                              s  5

                              a "S -o
                              •a e c
                             all
                             o
                    5

                    1
                              5 £
                              u S

                              5 S
                              O Js
             r-(  (X  O  rl
                               s
                               o
                                  S- I
                                          I S
                         360

-------
•at
                 0
                 to
     13



     I
                            5
   1
                            core? P* —
                            r-i g co 2
                            co .s >o g
                            *" & "f c
                            s! d^,
                    o
                   •§
                    O <
                    ft O
                          a

                          I
Is
S  £
     S»  %-.

     If  31
     fe 3  s s
                                    II
                                    2 2
                                    ~% s
                                    i-a
                                     ' '
     to

     I
     •s
                                    i

                                    I
                                    D.

                                    O
     I
     •a
     S
     s
                        361

-------
O
a.
Components of
Selected Remedy

nated soil
, soil was
team strip
and GW
e to SW
tamin
hing,
itu ste
halt;
harge
                                I   w 8 '? 8
n
flus
in-si
asph
disc
             0 -
       jo-     £ S
       CN s — '   t/) ^— '
                                    c"S=e s
                                    to " g -a
       .
       ?
       E
       t/3
it
y Si
< « S
'  ra u
o •> H
CO > <
                  55
                   *
                                        (S
                                                             s-a   s
                                                             co- s   i
                                                             <&    O
GW clea
SDWA M
carbon te
(MCL)
ontinued operation of the existing
ntercept/ treatment system; installatio
dditional extraction/monitoring wells
                                                             "8

tment system; and
nt, GW concentrations,
fication o
itoring of
ping rates
odi
m
mon
pum
                                                               ^•s
                                                               *- O
                                                               8^ S=
                                                             K_ U S° w 'fl
                                                             ^ o S £? a
                                                             o > s o &
                                                             S 8J
                                                             12
_ 3
sll
a;   a
o   »-i
                                   362

-------
S3;

la<
Cl
   p
 S »J
 g Bi


 H
 6S
o w

" 'S.
      § '0
    3 -2 *
 £l£S|
'S s e? e a
•
V L.-.ti «J >
•c E e 4^ ^
" a o c o
o E e g «-


lalfl
       o
•S $ - -2 g? 2
1 k s g •§ g>
e '
6 > a o
                     o
                     o
                     o
§2
tV OH

>5 S
                                               's u    gf 1   ^s<
                                      _

                                         --2
                      .
                      SLffl-S-s
                       «
                       gi 8 Il| g
                             ^3 „, a co c
                             ^ S to 3 S
                             p '« .Of "3 ">

                             S g 1 6 S
                     |
                               "5.
                                       Tf s S g S s .s .s

                                         O CO
                                         i-i 00
                     13
                        v
                             ra S? S

                             •s i -2


                             I1S^
                             e c oT ^
                             §•==•?.
                             U ys 1J X


                             & H C ^

                             O > ^ M
                                       j= 2
                                       w QJ
                                     "Q ." W

                                     111

                                     1st
                 5
                         363

-------
u
o.
3
B
u
       s
       s
     -
     S o

     §Ia

     JSl
"8
IB
      o
      II
               B
               O
               •a
                o
      1
         O    o °
         v0--  § -a
         S.|  Si
                         o


u"
E
S
S
to


X
S
2
1/3


£
Signature I


•a
C)
Remedial A<
c
.2
v*
O
b
u
£



09/21/87



"ra
B
E
4»l
VI


c/3
'B.
to
co



03/29/85
1st


t/3
Wamchem,


ca
Industrial F



06/30/88


                                                  "!  §
§
GW cleanup goals were based
Federal AWQC and include:
benzene 0.7 mg/1, toluene 5.0
mg/1, xylenes 2.0 mg/1. Soil
cleanup goals were based on
estimates of contaminants that
a c
•|J8
-I*
to -° bo
c *o .S
C flj V5

•g,
o

Cvf

GW and SW quality should m
State primary drinking water
standards. Soil and sediment
be removed to background or
C
I
"B ll
CB w
ex? 4!
|s -a
as B
E'l'i
•« 0 5
6 0 5
O g_, ^
•g o-S
E "3 »
£3 > E
S ° 'S.
s e s
8 g g
13 tr<
> B K
? 01 u
b§^
§ g T3
c/3 is flj
1
1
V)
o
Z

&
1
S
*C
r























                                                         IS
                                                  •o _
                                                  B ^ =6 «
                                                  "J S 3 6
                                            =1
                                            .a-3
                                      s n Ss 3 ° E
                                    >- s y S •§ •« S
                                    I 8 S 11 S •&
                                                       «
                                                   •E ^   ^
                                                   0) .—   O
                                                   .w &.   CO

                                                   Is   ^
                                                           _E

                                                           b
                              364

-------
E -0 J3
.p c se
^ « ,9
"> eS

      fl
£   ill
£   "-S'i
«2^S§
73 60 S O >


*l?'8^
" *? > » _
imen

idual tes

osal; G

of tr
sed
          T, ^f g>»
          C .,^> ^ =

          " cTJ: « §
          n: .2 a 5 5

         -
         •a
         4J i
     S       «

1S"
c ^

   2U
   4^

S"S
^s "
- S
X ^


«!

II;
                               o* bo
                               J— c

                               j^ 'B,
                               c a.

                               2 S

                              .S «-

                              §2
                              » u

                              o E
                        .


                  lill
                  ™ 3=5.5
                  S '£-•«
                  o S.S «
                  JS

                  •Sri

                  w ex   S

                  S g   £
                  Li. JJ   (S
                                             .
                                            S &   S 'I
                                            w S   =8 8
                                            «A o   O a.
                                             £ S
                                             * S
                                           £ 'S c 2 = E
                                           y < '"   ** $°
                                           & u a     -
                                                       ^4
                                              .    *     „

                                           Zll
                                               2ui Jb eo

                                             o * "-S
                                             1 _ S- •«


                                           =5 £ S 1 ob

                                           t- "O in" 2 Si
                                           O C bo «" _
                                 ra 2 3 •= c o
                                 — e cr   ;
                                          •? S
                                          s a
o   =   g   ^5

                       1
                                      365

-------
1
1^3
sll
l*°
1
o
Q.
3
1
°






o-r
S E
i *
8.TJ
II


 g
8 -5 of w
I'SSS
•Sisffi
slili
^ E-il o
G 2 .E .S .5
j
E
1 8
1 I a
in

c ^,
w S
flj gW
v&l S
o S o
v* f v>


w
S
1
re
O
Z

.§ "o '3
CX qj
Illfcg
;,, 2 U t5 •§
I Ssla
I|jjj
fc -g"^ E H
^ S. ^ § -3
z 5 B JL 2



V
Z
.8
0 &
Z w

e -g
° -5 S
Soil and GW
laminated wi
petroleum-rei
releases

fi i
s? 1
ii ii
in
         o?   S
         "X   4>4
         g   ^2
366

-------
Ill
S-i.
§3
  II
                              S
                              fe.
                              co -
                 fc
                     13
                     c
                     M
                                          O\
                                          CO
                                                    •- c 5 S 5-
                                                    •a to u JS ra
                                                 — o

                                                 '§S.
                                                 QJ A
                                                 -a .S
f   S
I   «
                           II
                           -rfT Wl
                                                                         §
                                S  §
                                c$
                                s
                                   367

-------

































v
co
a
33




**
I9
4J S
nj Cl<
g<3
D.














"JS
O
a
§
1













S
fcfl
P a
'SJ 5
>
"8
I
1
i!
S




1
£
tfl
5


i
3
1
>
§

1
a
"co
H
E
D;
c
O
"Si
a;
rt
co
CO
Ov
of
to
co_
co"
w




f
1

1
CO
CO \«
?s
i
O
4^
"§

£
S3
1


ti-l
O


s
M
3
2
ws
a
1
1
CQ
1
CO
s
s
^
g
CN
tC
•s
1
•8
1
^
I cancer-rii
I
I
*-o
ftj

1
o
£

I
S
1
•a
1
s
'e
a
8

s

<~s






U
1
1
B
P
i
(A
3
•8
2
S
X
OJ
u-l
o
^j
g
E
S
I
•g
*B
S
1
1
•8






•g ^
antaminati
0
1
an Chemicals,
1-1
o
5


in
•3
_3
"^
_C
.S
B



§



s
1
•a
c
CO
a.








o
o
°5.
in
v>



~S
i
1

.a
13
s
1








i2
B
<0
4i
o
.•s
'S
•s






(JT
'S
E
E
CO
9
1
1
S
!
s
•a
^



i
CO
3
C
1



|
K
SJ
S
J2
1,
60
J-8
11
U VI


















-a
J
1
CO
1
•8
&
1
c
V
E
8
H



« _   o w
°_ C?   O —

   §2   °. 3

   '5,   r s

8" 5   Bl
•a D

1 E
  •§ * .1 =  ° 8 3 
-------
si
       S, fc"-a re  .
           (Tl
       '0 "5 M is a
       g, P -B BJ 'C
S. 2 "5 Si
? o- s §

li"*
             u e
        Si
          §"*
         : ~ S 2
       "8
       (S

       1
       o
           ^


      •g 1 «S
       •=" m i- w
      •S c » ir bo  •« -S
      ^•§^ a c^2 c o
        C.2 Qj^S ™T3
      ttS^N^u-ae
      Ss-=S"oES™
              a"
           E V
  5g"§.OS-S.3l
  0>nea.-2Ea
          ra
          'C

3

$  -5 s

S  II
              fO  t/i

              O  r-t
                       °. s

                       I!
                     §1
                                          2 §
                                          £•2.
                          eg v

                          •35
-iifli;ni
Slfe-cSSlail
O^-2uwJt;5'5!<
                       8
                       C ns
                       n .c


                       O 2

                                es  oo
                              "2 -S  -E

                              SI'S!
                               » 
-------
>
"CM
1 ™u
1 13 S
OH



tn

O
O
o.
3
e
S
0





Components of
Selected Remedy
; tU3

U o;
& 8
•g
(Q u
.3 CO
Provision of home carbon treatment un
bottled water as an interim alternate w

•8
IS
'u


o
2

4_>
'S W"
GW contaminated
VOCs including TC

Byron/ Johnson
Salvage Yard, IL


m
S
o
|l
S J,









c
nj
1
C
8



1









_8
c
metals, and inorgai
including cyanide

09/23/86
2nd




o
o
Us
rH",S i


g
Isl


— - J5 §
*S = c
Ja'S 8
I| i
§*^ '!
c (/" ra
S H e
u^ 8
"3
1 »
E T
a s
Removing wastes generated during the
investigation; covering, regrading, and
revegetating surface; GW and SW moni

•a
aj
"S
'u
g-

o


4-i
'S
GW contaminated
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, and
1
e
« =3


m


o
o
5

b
C *c3
aj ~^
Is
™ <0

*-J
55
"c js
If
73
U O1
Si
a"8
w u
13 3
plugging and abandoning monitoring w
longer in use; providing an alternate so








T3
60 C
C ra
TCE; metals includ
arsenic, chromium,

Waste Disposal/
Dumping Area



S
oZ
"ro
3
c
c



"8
QJ
.5 v.
03 U

03 'C
flj "O
— §
!"§
"H ^
^3 ^
I S
en C
'o
.E T3
E ^ a
drinking water by extending the water
the municipal system; and implementinj
institutional controls including GW use











lead; and other
organics including
cyanide

06/30/89























deed restrictions













•E
m




rl „
^ o ^
N <-^ C "9
Si ^1
co a. 2 >
-" S 5S S
w >i On,









1
I
!«
|
o

£!
Excavation and offsite RCRA disposal o!
drums

1

'u
W)

O



t/i
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, and organic
including PCBs
§
Cemetery Dump,
09/11/85
1st


m

g
|
8








u
3
1
Q.
a.
(0
8
H
§
?

-------
Compo

Selected
     s
 •^   08
 3   O


 1  |1

 s  si
 l§|

 111
 2 g S
 3 S o
    S

    2
f?8
U BO —
'iS c ra
So g

 «I K_ ra 'C
•S I w.2
1-sll
e 3 g —
!

I


f
^ w
"U c"i

lr
1 =
llw
8-:S
^o-g
O > a
•s  ">
S  00
I  ^
«  n
      •g
      CN

51
          .§<
          M CC
          li
          o S
          o-B

          gl
          C ^


          ^ i

          Si
          a. ..
          ..


          Ill
          o
              •a
              B
              CO
          S I jV
         1'e
         « CO


         I Si
   /.-•a J8
   ;5 2
   j U QJ
   ».£ 6
      co  g

      I  I
                          O r=
                          00 S
 rf£6  81
S3  cu -a

i^§s

11 2 «f
2 ~  . s
g-S S*
°r^ 8
   E -a
   .2 g
      ao
      £

      •a
      3

      "u j«

      .S ^


      B|

      E a.
g"E
S
                                     1

•a

Sl«
> co B

-II
>T eg o
> ^ C


-8fl:
C (U O "


n!
=P a •£ f
Sj'Si
                                 *•!

                                u-.g|
                                    CU CJ

                                    ff-S
                                    §•"
                                    o -a

                                    g>g
                                                     ;:-.§  8
                                                     £ 5,  ti
                                                     « S  o
                                                     Vt -^  V)
                               B

                               °£
                                      O
                                                    1
                                                     O
                                                    "8
                                                    2
                       371

-------
a.
3
C

s
u
     8
     1
          £14
         1
     0-5
     i * »• 5 ••
     Bi 
-------
     Q.





     1
f, x 3 .a


I 111
          11  IJ
          gllsll
          a s

          M | 2



          111
          V 'u ?


          Ill
          bo e .5
          C CJ C
           *3 -a —

           '
           'c e •
          O K M a,
          I
          o
          " w
           .

          1 =
          1 1
          U > ra
5  I
oT  _      "3

•si-    II
O  !3    •-<   i


w  S E   o  01
                       8
                       o
                 -S

                 5
                                  ~  o
                                o "S  o

« zs
^H * »M
V) U U


Excavat

contami

residual
                                 O "& u

                                 -a — S
                                 b " .S
                                 C w to
                                 3 -g M
                                           OJ P fO O)
                                           be " (& So


                                           Ili
                                            -
                                           C T3 "C C
                                 x
                                 01 o

                                 £^1 0
                                 5 2 JS ffl
                                           "8
                                           is
                                           o
                                                              s
                                                              '
                                                              £
                       "S-s
£t
Sn
Soil, sediment, S
GW contaminat*

Z
E"
01
js
o
,p!
w
in


•a
c
VOCs, organics
including PCBs,
inorganics



&
IO
CN
1







£



Brook sediment
K
0
•g
«
en
2
E
in

£
contaminated w








w
^
60
_C
^
3
U
_q
>



S
^
ro
0?
O


S
I
w
K
•o
c
n








•a

including PCBs,
metals






2

J
•a
GW contaminate



|

u"
[J-
in
w
^
'•3
|
>








373
                      S


                      cs

                      o?
                      o

-------
















Record of Decision Summary Table
£
g°
K?
b
N
§2
E














C T3 J3
s S s
5 J- U
•M S 5
S "S. ^
SuO
a.



CO
"s
O
o
ex
3
c

O



Components of
Selected Remedy
u
E
3
5
>
OJ
I



(U
2
£
^>
s
S

$ i
|"|S$
CO cC OJ —
^ " *-< (tj
«j 3 =3
a S s n
K 1 .§ 1
t/a ps
'5
0,
P*

I S
°-— ^
m 2 S
a -a s
~ 3 o
Vj Cl* y^

1
§ *o

 KJ hA
CJ t* J|j
||g
•- W5 m
CO 5j ™
ii g? b
U .5 «2
T3
Excavation of sludge and sediment and remc
of aqueous lagoon wastes with solidification
and offsite RCRA disposal

CO
CO
<•> M
T3
?- 8
o o
o *-^
S 2
•* rH

en
u jc Ta
G -c (3
1 s 1
la-E
« CO CO
•sl.s
™ 2 g
=3 § E?
t/3 O O

S
u"
I -
5 §
£ oo
O vo to
ffc O r^
LT)
8 I
8 Oo
OS 0-3
53 S 2 "> §
*- S e 2 c
8& 1 11

I°S.
*— t- bO l*~l O
O QJ c wa C
•pS 2 § K
fa £ ^ oo u
0 •=! -C a 5
8 .a £ g j« '
8 1 S § .S
g •* c Js S
|§S"|
^11^
•a'g| o-al
tu co — « -e S3
i §£b! S.
rt 8 o ° .5 S-
v -Ti
T3 -c -a c cu
r- ^ C n ni
Removal and offsite incineration of drums ai
associated contaminated soil, followed by
installation of a containment system around
landfill including a RCRA cap, slurry wall, a:
a dewatering system with a leachate collectii
treatment and disposal system; access and di
restrictions; and GW monitoring

CO ( 	 ^
E -a 
?, -a ra S
__ _. " ^"
o 91 8 '3 -a
o o o S"s
rSJS, rfB$
8 .a
'S 2? "2 S
&T3 .E g g
, E? c -a ra co
C O CO J3 nJ-
3 6 £ S S .s
> 'I 3 - 5 -a
^!^si
"Ss-s>l-;|
™ 1 "i -o- " -i -
=§ 'a 1 g g S -s
c^ 2 .E K P S a
H
;g
'c
Is- I >
> 13 cu -c =3 5^
s g b s e «
§5. < a •§ JP
g .a ^ "S g <^
& O 1-1 iS J o
in
o
O
O
cf tf
3 S S"
o M -5
o"  W
CO C

374

-------
>
!"§
1 ™
i-l
I3












%

*o
1
1
5























Site Name,
State/Type/
ignature Date/
C/J





a
1



«
"s
o
o
o.
3
1








"8

4J
W5
ffl
£

E
V
3
S
a.
>

£
H



E
O
1
~n
H
rt
E
.0
'00
a;
B;

0
1"
fO_
V)

1
t/3

I
's
J2
I
0.
a


1
5
•a
CJ
ro
.S
'35
3
c
1
03
E
'5.
g
O

"8
ta

g.
&

o

j=
1
*o
CJ
CO
.e
3
o
u
^

O
8
^dblum Industri
S


in



E

O
•o
3
TJ
_E
J2
<$
I
&
I
i
ir
§
i

Q
OJ
So
u
"1
^
1
1
1
3












00
.£
"u
c

*3
o

>


§






!
•a
c
03
^
3
to
tk
3
in
OJ
c
1







00
E
|
1
B
i
T3
C
cd










^
,
a
§
s,
OS
              o
                 S.S
                 5S g
                 O > .S
              OJ

              11

              II
                     I
                            a. E
                            a 3
                                  S|   g*h
                                  iiilw
                                  "still!
                             00

                           .ft
                           •g §.
            if
        llill
   lOj.BSSg.gt
   g-^^ £5 s g-S
                             o -t:
                                I'M
                            o- E  T3  "
                               'g 5 jf 8 -n 2 -a

                               fa J a =3 || jg
                               C T3 -O 9S E .S -S
                            -
                            80
                            o ^-^
                           "S^

                           18 •=  J2
                           5 * oo 2
                           u TJ B aj
                            . a =3 E

                           = B-2-o


                           •- 1 -S

                           ^ § 'S I
                            •• O CO "pi

                           tn 'to o E
                         uj K
                         _ O
                                •a -o

                                1 §
                             =   u 'C
~  I?
42  ^5
                                  3 ,3
I
      375

-------









V
3
£
^
c
n
P

Decision S
•8

1
8
£
&>
£
£
N
P
£















•^
"g ng a
113
111
| 3 8




J2
S
o
D.
3
C
S
D





's-s
a g
Componeni
Selected Rei





o
B
"o
S-
a
CO
5
B
z
£
!

N. C
a c

1 JL<3|
z \ 1 "«
.§ § In
W yi OO r
i/3 B!
c
c
'5b
c
cc
^-\
§a 8> n> E
f -5 -S u .2
M 5 op | k, E |
Ill-all!
•° s % ° ° - »
•§ 1 -s « ^ .9 1
- S S 'g 'g S 1
•^3 C ?S •-— »^H be Ti
5 Sg-g-S f.E
Is •"? -a E
"2 S E "2
C « f« C

           B
           ra
0/87
                                 ~
i   s

                 376

-------
>
t= -g a
o S S
£ a O
a a s
Its
(X



J2

O
i







ot
{2 E
c cu
c *

8.TJ
11
3$




cu
E
3
"3
^
CU
VI

5
e
2
1


S

S .2
ciT ^ 5 S
2 Xs 3 .^
.Sail
1/3 all
in &,
c
.0
If
1 0 ^


01 ° o d o —
8 8" S .9 8 3
j? * CN g- 10 g

1
"Q g JJ
— ^ re
C C CO
Q O O
§ -3 60
SB 2 0.
i •- 3
i'g §
? s-
18 SB^
7 '!•§ 8
i s;sf
Isll
60
To -C
c o
| 8 1 |
E co £ fj .« E

CO e co 'O _ *^ 60
£ s c a fo -a -
t)'| S.1 ^§!§
•s s-a a> u » s,
O ys «— U 00 aJ ~"
•§8§ xiyi
ffl 55 (^ CQ 03
- "g 8 13 ^ c>
S « s T ^ -S 5
•8 i*a|.-a S-g
c 1 J! r. ™ S? «
o 2 o £* ^c > • «
'fl oc •— a? S2
islil^l
e 5 '"° @ E u '£
rS '5 0 « B § 8
U > CJ & C u b

T3
C
§CO
'o "^
o~ •£> w 'S

CO "5_ CO CO
^-^, S E
C > OH
Sgrf
o T, E~ ' £
T= S c= e
C CO ^- CJ
™ .S 3
== E tl "9
5 2.S g
E?
2 E
'E 5» "°
«i 1 co
u == 
CN
1




E
3
'1
e
j=
CJ


















CO
c
E
H
                                  8
                                  ri
                                   !,
                                  •o
                                  '!!

                                  I" 8 ^ -S E
                                  f
                                  w
377

-------
  D.2
  ^-^ f
a -5 .S


|l fiif
W a S, re re
a

1
I
2
•a
  •s-S


  |l«
  ^ o y

=    •
o 8



.j



"re

'C



u
    > .S
            m  i
           I B jj I i


           "I A a e 8-
            v
             >
               = S= S
               S x O o
               > a; K c:
                 TD T:
                e B C
                B re «
           o
           o
           in
s

I
s
           35   s
                            o  a
                             -  re

                            Sil
                             O
                             s s
                             aj
                             £ a
                            2 g

                            g I
                            u C

                            •8 8

                            § °

                            s £
                            T!  ffl

                            B  V,
                            1
                         •3   g-
                         e   o


                         =
                                  I

                                          \O    Wi


                                          il  §
                                          tf O,  ^
                                          a" g  o
                                          O o
                                          x   oo

                                              So
                                              o
                                          o   o
                                                           "8
                                                           ta


                                                           1
                                                           o
                                          •i i    ^

                                          a SSI'S
                                          s "  s  a ™
                                          *-1-g-5* s
                                          ^_, *o £J  w 5 'e

                                          ° -^ s I s a
                                              •s  re __, u-
                                              E  oo^ o
                                              ».  - re .5
                              J-sll-a
                                         _re
                                          a,

                                         <£


                                         •J
                                               o
                                               CO
                                                                      I
CO
c

S
                            378

-------
U

0.
3
C
Components

Selected Rem
•a
44
        §c?  o
       .2  §
       8 g-  §•
       g£  £
•o  v-
SS-2
e "a c
I*-S

M*S
fa w e
Sew
v S c
4J .52 O
e s u
3 § •*
"5. 8 .2

!•=!*
S S C oo
a | s^
oj n«  W
|SS2^
       D. i
       C, t

       'C !
       «3 §
       .£ « E
       "« i_i c
       3 OJ O
        S3 «
       IS 15 -a js
       Sir g

       E

       Jill
        X fc
      1
Wl T-]

T3 1 g1

c ™ W
19 C ^



111
      s
                 "8
                SI&B
                 2
                 a
             .S  Q
              S
                •
             S?  .S
             £  £
             «   .
             x.  „
             ON  («
             O  rH
                                •g-a

                                S 0
                                HI
                                El!
                                o
                                o
                                o
                                o"
                                o
                                o
§ll
111
2
OH
BO
!
a
'0
'e "a
23
5 u.
                                                S
                          379

-------
\


1 *<3
|aS



a
1








*»
Components of
Selected Remedy




' V
1
1

1
^

Threat/Problem

a .§
v 1? ^ 8
ra P <" -
2 \ 3 .5
.sill
1/2 w^
c
o
'So
n and maintenance of
vision of three private
Is; and additional GW !
£P-5 'S 8 "B !»•>

"O ro ? . „ $
I'i Sll§


o
o
o
o"

rH^

Soil, SW, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PAHs, and
inorganics


60
60
22 _
m — tv co
• _- °° 3
o is o *
c " '
1,3 8 2


U)

£
0
o o •»
o o *
O u O u
\" C s~* r^ C
Sal s a o
O OJ
",€
° 11^2
l-r|S|
O O eg w —
Q "O QJ "" QJ
« 2 "S S «
111 111
III Iff
^ S
c ^
g S ,3 w
"" ni ^
S E b c&
1 1 ^ ^
^< ra O O^ M
2 J rH O rH


in


o
o
o^
Sa

1!
F!
§•1
C "
Is
•a 3
E^


U— i
O
C
o
s

ffl
•a
oj ra
to p
§ S

ra 05
S w
x 5


^
o

CO-
rH

C >
8g
&'i
O 2
E
c
,3
2
0
2
tu _
S S


in

380

-------
& e
c 
-------
e -g a


c •§ S

§ Q °
cu




i/i
§"~*
O
D.
C
CO

U



Components of
Selected Remedy
x u

1 ~™
' «u
< w
^



1
2

(X
>
g
fS


^^1
-- i> 03 *3
E|°^
2fS3
•sSfl
w«.&l
yi PS
1
es
o
o
0^


•^•
oC



3
ffl
^
y
1
D.
13
^
'§
•^
1

Excavation and onsite consolidation of ash


,
O
§

'~i



c
o

5
C5
"§
~
&

£^
'§
's
in



c , 	 s
tS tri

-5 i

£
"8^

S "§
"§ —
8 §•
S CO
J5 0
cy
1 i
V3 "^
II

wastes and soil into landfills with capping of
landfills and previously excavated areas; GW



o
O '
o_ "53

-. .0
V
wi C
Q <"
n ~^

£*
*£ W
? ^
13 bo
«j -S
ll
2.S

a
Incinerator, (


8
o_

S s
*°_ 08
SS

u
rn" U g fe
^ "5 c S.
° « S 8
s — « S
§ | ° |
,3 "» -a S
5 '"? S C
CJ " ^
° § ^S
•^ u c —- 1
I'sll

pumping and treatment with discharge to
POTW; vapor/vacuum extraction of liquid
disposal area using carbon filters; continued
testing of soil, ash, and tributary sediment;

a
c
1 S-JT
'3 _§• g
ffo*


C "U

i- l^ •—
3d 3 "O w
o "3 w"^
•5 EC "0
S .a °- B
^ !(f-a
g 0 0, CO

1|>
Incinerator/\
Disposal Faci
06/30/89





















co *o
provision of an alternate water supply for are
residents and businesses; and implementation
deed and land use restrictions







13


g
^
_3
^
'«
1
S


To


o


o

5


I

«
i
.2*
3
H
bo
1
?
U




W "? cf

^ § S

'o
11
b C (8
C ™ "c
S W " ,j
fe .§ J js
1-1 S W tg
"^ c1 S ~
•"* jj .5
|£~ |
•q _M u. aj
Ilsl
its
Installation of new soil/clay caps for lagoon
and landfill and in-situ solidification/
stabilization of sludge and landfill gas flaring,
necessary; site monitoring that includes GW,
SW, and landfill gas monitoring; offsite GW

IS
J*— 1
tA
3
•z



'$•
V3
•a
c
«
.,
g
— -
&

1
i
in







w"
^J

•£ T3
•5 C
f BO ™
ID .S W
^ 1 S
c *u - "nJ
'i •- = I
1 § CT3
8>'2 "
1
"B
C i -^


1


S <;>•

0,^7 jj


s
CO C
3 §•








•8
c
1
ui
I
13
Interim GW treatment using granular activatei
carbon and air stripping

"g
tc
i
o
2
x
'5 w
[ ]
1s
ra S?
c .S
'11
2-i
§-s
^ O
O >
2
s
e S
2|
S la
E 03 -g
2 II
l/>

/— \


s-§
o e
CO flj

-------
•R
    <* 2  ^
    £ -a  s •§
    *^ f«  -W C
     O
    .

    I
     D.


     60
    •a s
    u Sfi

    °l
    6^
    £2
     O
     sj?
     g-S

     £8
     O >
     c S-
     O Cu

       •
               O
               "8
          s
          §
          z


          e^>

          II
                    j» a  g 3

                    is  sTl
                    (fl Ci   S
II I  I  HI  I I  111 i  i  II!
5 <;

£>



f*


|
                               I
                                    8
                               §s
           5 r? <" E 6
           S^5 | 13

           5B2 8 £
                                    "S
                                    o
                               "S
                                    O > to
          III
                      2
                      'a
                         2 5
                                              sf 3 N '3 x
                                         I  "8 s^^ |s

                                         Sji «|^g'§n.§


                                         !**SlsS*i
                                         •a-plr, *«33co-s
                                         gBSttZ0-5i56

                                         *1 I 8*I^« 1
                                         §-Jf BlM^Bl
                                         G2g,e"a«s"3J-o
                                         ||||-||5t§


                                         rslllli
                                              •a
                                              c
                                              ra
                                         Q.
                                         G.

                                         'B
                                               ..

                                              IB
                                              a o>
                                         G§
                                         1
                                              o
                     f

                     'I

                     "S^
                     a 2


                     is
                     23



                     §l
                     5* O
                     o >
                        383

-------

if

is
rn" Q
N 
-------
-a a
         :-S
      1  11
       c^ E
           '5
       S 2
     1"
          WV hH



         11 &
     =   I
     IB  a
     if  S
o
CO
     z a
      So  o 2
      8 H  g e
      £>i  S3,
                 C -S

                        .li
                       .&
     •SlJfJl
     fulfill:
     "S i -a .s § w .s s .5
     Vi C S »t flj B "O • n ^3
     ^ssag«sa=
                  s
g



< W CU
si I
CO — CO
                                  1
                      ^o
                      Ui 4-1

                      y 5
                      2 0 S S
     fi en ^
     VI   v^
     3 -a 
-------
           o
           o.
 E

C/5


 §

.a
*5
a  E
c  v
e ~

8.TB

II
1
i
                      o c?
                      o fl

                      11
                      o     o

                        s
                                        c "O

                                        I g
Excavation and offsite disp
sewer line to privately-own
o
•2
S
ra
jc
13
C
ra
to
3
•o
00
_c
'c
ra
_jj
"o
Q.
3
60
C
'Si
t*3
1
§
C
60
2
'3
.0
1
.5
"5.
1
"S
•a
•a
c
ra
disposal of any contaminat
£?
I
u
•S
|
to
Q.
03
I
g
§
ra
Two-stage GW pumping an
2-g.gg
°l^E
*w "- OJ .>
e-5 §5
•IS §£
™ 5 n K
1^2
a S. o a,
mi
3 (8 ra T)
mentation of site access an
restrictions
             <4_i




             1
                      O
                                        o
                       •8
                          BO -a


                      l-^l
                      £ i ^ S


                     •il-M
                               * S" 8

                               '5J S
                               -a P,
                        u
                          s e

                          11
                          xi o
                               re 2?T3 Ti
                               c .£ e c
                               E'~ TD W ""
                               _ 3  _J£  „
                               2 "o w ra  E

                               c S V v  =

                               8 •;£ E i

                               > g WTS  S
                               ^ LJ LJ c _e
                               O > P S  u
                     S


                     Si"
                      Cl

                     I
                                         1   i  3
               o
               o
               o

               o"
                                                                             -
                                                                            >o  n
                                                                            CO  BO
                                                              S
                                                     e
                                                     TD


                                                 _   I
S
(A



Is
                                                                    S
3
S   S
                                                                            tf
                                                                            z S
                                              386

-------
-  a
a
  u

  ~
           -

          '
                 « "S
                 <•> 3
                                    s
  .«? §
il|l
fill
                                     . —
                                    rx a


                                    SI
8 g
°- e
a =
       ••§•§
       s S

       g>fc
       .S > oo
       &8.g

       3=5.2
       :« « e

       Bfrl
       Si ur-
                                    .-= c «
                                      SB 3 u
                                      S ^ •£ 2
       S '5
         y -a
         a 2
       =3 §5
       on S >
      •
      c
      si

                                    I

i   «
                                     •S $
                                     •> g
                                     > ra w
                                   _ -o E?p8

                                   1 S o ^
                                    * to -n
                                   T3.S C »
                                    c E « -S

                                    " Ifl^
                                   > o O ^3
                                   o 8 5 .S
                                                    §
       J
                                 387

-------
8.]}
            8
       Uj>


       e
      E E
      wZ-3
         '?•§

        -II
      > .1 8 E
      = g'in 2
      .sS-g S
      S-l
      o 5
      1
      I
      1'e
       M M


      g§
B U  -
•s e 5J
   > c — .s a
  nT . u M s; .5
  e a •?..« 8 w


glliltl
                       si  Jl
                       SI  ll
                     1
            "8
            e

            1
                     o
                        Sf  81
                        1^ .'".  *V\ iWJ*
                     •c
                       ri  S
                        ra


                        "2
a

Jf
                                      11
                                     g

                                     •a
                     ll
                         d  S S
                             388

-------
O C «

5 ™ u

sis
          OJ

          3
          I



          I
         "a
         a.
         to



         I
                        tx C?

                        m S
                        00 .t-


                          <»   ^5
                        j; O   — .2
             « -o
             V B
                                    10 .  IB

                                   ! "g .3  B

                                    313 =
                                                                O -R  00

                                                                R 3  2
                                                                v> £>  <*
                                I

A
£
$
«
E ^ x
E °-S
9 a i
w g J
r* ** CM
1 |1
.<9 eg
C o j2
S O T3

Q ""

^
1
at
1 !
i O
1 «
Eb to
u
tu
1
M
•g
to
>
&
•S
i
c
o
•a
u
to
| c
rg
•a-s
0 0
Z £
qj

3
.1
0 1
                             O

                             60
        5
         to
                            •if
                             t-  60
                             jj  e
                            •S "C
                             S  §

                            li
                              _

                              s

                            II
ed
                                s
                                u
                                _2
                                3


                                2
                                60
GW
                                           •s
                                           F

                                           1
                                                                          .5
                                                                          Its

                                                                          Ifr
                                                                          " to
                                                                          •slf to
                                                                          o
                       tx

                       tC
         o
         S w
         nj I*

         (S O
g

•g  .
<8 _,
&0
C

is «
S S
Ov

O
         -a  c


                                          •a'I
                                           f> C  O w

                                          £|'g«3
                                          O S  to cC
i-e
S ID
eu j:
B! U

1
                                     389

-------
•f-g a
sll





us
C.
3
C
ra
a



Components of
Selected Remedy
> u
e
' 3
H *O
>

> a
< ts
' 5
?


CJ
2
a
PH
1>
1


£2 O
dj1 "aj" ^ ' u
c P-I Q -tf
2 C 3 !S
Si * a "B
rS ~ &> S
w«s
1

0 c
?! 53 2"
So

"c3
o >
" O
s "8 1
|3j 0
& £,"3 T3
O « 3 Oj
Hj r^ 4J "O Uj
0 Q " '? '"
£3 o=5 g,
^s S^r
ge'^S
Is S I a
iilfis
- i'3 S ^
'5 .52 g* jj o
t/l 13 C J5 00
•§
rt
Excavation and offsite disposal of contamin
soil; and GW monitoring




<*i
•o

O --5
§ 8
r-i ^
^
'I
"Sj£
3 S

s
j-j 2
S™
19

S
*p u
— E IX
_y 0 -^ g
3 ^ 5 ^
3 S 3 CO
as 1 1
in
o Is- I
^, O '
Sll 11 B 11
SI III gl
J3 .S -

2 o *^ "^ 3 w
a * «^ o'|2o
*-1~!ii^iS'so
C"t«o C '? — • *O ^J *^
III
Urt.S&E'S.Snsu
& j:
3 -e 60
0 S c
Excavation of soil and onsite thermal
destruction with disposal of ash as either
backfill or placement in an offsite RCRA fa
(if ash is EP toxic, teachable lead removal
treatment will be required); GW pump and
treatment using chemical coagulation, air
stripping, and activated carbon adsorption '
discharge in appropriate manner; and fenci


<•)
•a
>.
o
o
o
o"
in
CA
tfy
c > c1
8 J= -3 -a
J. •- 3. c
> ^ "o ra
*^3 "™ «2 u
inn
Sl 111
i
.&
ic
vs
~S 5 tv "5
C 0 CO C
E H ^- E
i a; co *
Sill
in
to
 i g1
                 ^ fc •«<^ • ^ -5
                 ^ S CJ "^ ^tf3 "u CO
                 & 8 > .S S .E i
                 S
                 .-
I
                     s
_  g
SI
                     i   il
390

-------
>
c •« a
o C ^
1 as
*^ « *«• '
e .5 S
Its

Cleanup Goals
Components of
Selected Remedy
OJ
I
•3
g
S
w
•2
&


1
2
S
OH
>

fS
\ c
.si
|" |S|
C 5T ^*
Sf §3
•alii
1/3 E. II
w (2
c
o
'S?
(2


*—
m ^ *
S"3 o
o 'S, *
 Mg E
c o e — 3
8tf!-i!
8 i 1 i •§
£
ex
E
3
0 in
N CO
1 £
3 i 2

L/>

r— %
1

°- S f 1
Is- £§
\O u •"•" S
TJ
Trivalent chromium does not
exceed the MCL (50.0 ug/1) an
lead was not reported above
detection units
Installation of a low permeability, compacted
earth material cap over approximately 7 acres
of soil

•8
c
1
W5
O
•z.
^
'I
S
M
c
1
2
c
8-9
11
5
c£
3
Q rv 1
N 00 ;-
1 ^ *
JS ^. "V
& S ^

m

S
3
§^ °
.2 8.1
!'§• §«
Si £.2

Water discharge will conform
with POTW standards
GW extraction and treatment with discharge to
POTW

o
o
o
o"
*o
r-T M
O "rt
<-« 60

O «
o ~s
c> v
8«|
1*1

•a S if
c w .y
™ c c
1,11


z
h- S
0 fc
C CO

irT I^N O 4-J
\o •—• ». f-
S> 3 ° § /-s
LO ••• O 55 he^
o- a. c^ Ju S
si ££g
^
•S "Re
™ V w c a box
e fc 2 '5 g S .S S
'Be1" -aSi^e
"«2 S-S-ni
ny" MO— y.=
- vf M _- > =3 .5 i
•go -a a - eoKiS-0
3 g 1 W = 8 3 -a
•SSrgglBo-^llg
JfitS-S §$£*!>* *
03_;~ g°O 3'CJ2 C -
liilslslllli
Implementation of a full scale soil vapor
extraction system; installation of a multimedia
cap; excavation of contaminated sediment and
consolidation of sediment beneath cap; GW
pump and treatment; and institutional controls
to include deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions with compliance point at the edge
of the cap

*•>
"R
o
8
m
£
U w-
•s-sg
ro '£
, * 60
g 1 =i 8
E 2 -n 'S
•— • e^ u >n
•p -3 c 80
$ E '" s
iW
c« y > M
oc
tc
"p
4J
S » 1
i § 4,
&* ^ 8

in

§


j-
«« >& S
bO&
Remediation is aimed at
controlling migration, not
restoring the aquifer to drinkin
water standards, thus no cleani
levels were established
GW extraction; provision of an alternate water
supply to private well users; GW monitoring;
and implementation of well use restrictions

"8
IS
•••
i
u
M
O
Z
•S T3 T3
•c r e g
f w eo n
"8 ^ S" bo B"
M » § s .a
Hill
3-S-a s 3 a
c e c •— .3
| - « js -a '§
^. o cif 2 S p
O > ^ E n -g
•z
v "5
O V
1 -a §
^ ^ xl
J= OJ .? 0
1 1! I 2

in

391

-------
u
 o.
u
          o o

          88
          •a
           c
           OJ
           60
           aj


          '
                   vO
                   00
m


I
                                t,      ^e

                                         S5*1  P
                                   »->    o .5
                                in s    o-q
                                                                                 E    3

                                                                                 1 S ^
                                                                                 K ra c
                                                                                 ego
                                                                                 "as
                                                                                 a.

                                                                                 2
                                                                      •s     °o
                                                                      •r     ^°
       e

c?    S
ro     i
                                                                                           eg"
                                                        392

-------
                            £.€
                            tx D.
                                  I
.a s..s S,

3*iB-§
O O O 3
if
55
u- •
 3 .5

            fjfgflfl"'
            2 " •§  U  £ i
                   o  S
                  1  I
                                     "?fl

                                     |l?

                                     |l>
                                     •S S o
                                     •95°
                                     18"
                                     ra ^ o

                                     us

                                      Sfl1 (LJ

                                     •- ^ P
                                     «I4J
                                      *
                                     c" oo
                                     •2 .E
                                     £j C

                                     If


                                     if
                                     > s
                         g I

                         •El
                         3 §
                         u Q.

                         |i
                         i *




                         111
ill
sl-S
G 2 .5
                                   •o
                                   13


                  393

-------





V
1
W
§
13
1
DM
|
Uu
1



















c-s a
!.!5
W Q M
P-
Cleanup Goals

jmponents of
ected Remedy


E
3
1
a
V3
5
5


2
S
PH
^
S
^

s§
l|S|
Sf§3
«> H «
a s « ^
K « .1 §
c/3 o-
B
0
'60
til
o:
1
f
8 g
^^ CL o
(A ^ 0

tg y •— »
lip
J2 "co -a
u §>S
-a
W extraction wells in the
lumes; treatment of extracte
tower aeration; discharge of
.2 1 S.

"8
S
Wi
fej
o
•z.
£
'I w
"§ ^
.S •—
B ;3
S "u
c •- u
Is^
O > s
5
5
•B
S
(U
'« 2
5 S


m


s|
o 8-

g 0
C^06
o w
'> G
0 «j \
•^ S.^ g1
t^l CO
8.sfa
S3 S CO DJ
•c v o n
5 X ! 60^
&"&-a
03 W 03 (0
Isl^
-a < -a 3

1
_c
o c
1














M
1 » 1
'u co ^
'2 js
3 ^j u
S^ w
0 rH




^1
S"l S"| 0
m &• & v ^
£& 5 £? S

= w S S
'S u _ g « '3
!hl ,?> .S
^ CO tfl
_ J2 "3 _, T3
^i"
lllll
Illll
s a "S *J
5 e-S^s g
flili
^. c « S —
S o K c 13
8 •£ u c ^
pi S = £ 60
co oo 8 'E.-E
^ -S " HI
0 § o'~-i
C 3 <^ i- £ 60
O " u To •- c
llni'i
811 til
£ b TS •« o E

'o .s „
« M £ :2
S ' o ° o '1 S "S
COOO<2T3 °-vk.
.5°°. "aJco2°^2
S"S255 fcei'S.*
J3
'? ifS
I'll 0.
_c £? i! S
c O s* .,
a T3 O 60
g CO _ 3
8 »s "?
M *^J cij
> O c E
O > .2 =
"~* ms "~
.2 -S .2 ix T3
a s o » .s
c; c a > ^

^ PJ ? ^ l-H I—I


U^

S
° ^
o O
0 O o —
It |i

•8
IS
1
CA
O
cl
achate collection drains;
ichate disposal at sewage
or at an offsite hazardous
facility; regrading with clea
^vegetation of bare and erod
Installation of le
provision for lea
treatment plant
waste treatment
soil cover and n

1

I
[A
O
"Z,

•o
lls:
"c *s *s 8
en 2i cd PH
^- E £? 60
to 's -s
£f $|!
0 8 > .E E
TI
c
•a s£ m
C CO
8 "w o
™ 2 S
5 Cj O


in






60
B
I
•o
B
CO
CO

















w
'-'




394

-------
^ „
g"g 8
5 § c
?*" CM U
c .3 s
U S- Qi

cx



y;

C
c

S
u

i
*


>>

v, X
o'S
a E
ss
Hi
il
u$

CU
3
1
s
J?
5
Threat/Problem
£g
P 1(31
E S; <
J? F& «
F-* x^ 3 .M
s g i"S
'^o r« Ex E
vj .2. u
to as
c
_o
*5b
OJ
OS
*o ^
o °8
°. 0 °
^ r- O -T-
m g o 10 a
JJ s ^ S" 1
(N (- o tx g
S-S5 SS
-rl >• C u . QJ
x ^ ra QJ --. -a c
8 o „ « M.y ^= ,, c .E
5 i!§I| IJI"^^
§E|gS.ga -SlS-S^llt,
.aSS^S-Sff'SlS'g.JilgfS
l^fiSlll-^JSS'elgflA
12 Sa „ l|-§Sjfa §| i " 6 -a
fflll-B^^I-cSi'i'eS^^ia
«§BjS"? --So£^aj°]c-i!s
ioto< oo i- u!2_ c'SS ra:5 e-a
•a^^-J^llSll SI.
all^5-5S^if^sU?j?j
l^glyil^llplllsl
Sa.ocrSnSeB.n.Si.aouSbpB
1 c o «>
I -a s |
,b •-' i- ^ o2i *2
n 2 J! qj O 'S
•2 « C S-T3 § § %
c^30ajEE>--3
o **j ~o 3 Sj -^H ^ >^
.- _ ..c cS^ -S
^ C ^J ffl '"" >. L- C "-^
^oC^c"™0^3
t/3 *S rt C S '3
^r S K .2 8 g* 9f 3 o
>• 3 oj -3 •— ^ c- "C
^••riu TO 'ff ^ c a\ &
Uga=Eg^|g
u-ucna? . g =
0 «fe S g,^ g"5, o
»Sm---"1c5p
Ill^SsIl
Iflijlfl!
S^^'oSocgg
Sillill 1
oPRS^w^'u^
3£iJ3^iES.S
•o
c
c
I
o
•z
.a u
•RS U
u -s | a § s
»•? bo| ff B
Jill!!
K E — T3 w g
- 3 fl 5 "ra -
i> c n ^ ^J "O
a S > "6 e S
•« ^ E
•g I 1
^ S ^^3
-Sri fi-a-o| os 1
S - u .& fc c » E
§1 ^"11 § 4
m (0 i -3 t- W X. ™
5o Sl8rt 8 <^


lO

*— \
58
o o °
0 e o -3 C1
0 g 0 0 « "
o § •§ m" e fe
to 2 n ° C S
^ai ss^

ji
ai .2 j?
c -a w
S 5 3
— e 

MO?
1 C J2
•a c "§
•a a; S
re g _
V ^S
1 §1
S s E
OS E w
60
C
'S
a,
"fi
US
•f S
ra Jj
.s-g
g «
^^ >T
S S
QJ t/J
|s
(C
SdJ
B>
•g-s
s.y
bo-o
c
•a. § g>
E a -c
i.§ 2
S|1
0 5 E

1
'1
W5
Q
S
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
S
5 „
> £ 2 oo
g OJ CO
S •£ E ^?
3 CX — o)
ra & 13 S
55 5 S ^2


in


                            is
                            "
usi

ys
bon

atm
fi
                          "8
                          is

                          1

                           c > c
                          Sis
                          c « ;•=
                          w C 2


                          111
                               u —   Ov
                               s D.  Xi
                               S S  \
                               3 3   o;
                               S to   o
395

-------
1"SS
1 M5
£ s s
 c
Si o
l&a'l
« C u -
2 > a-2
S 3 «"S
•* s .§ s
c/i en
c
c
'5
u
K

S- 11
s^i
£
<**
j?
^
E "
>.
o .ca
•8?
° J3
— .S3 >,
3s.£
so 3 "3
Q, Sfl OH
3 " _

g CO ^
QJ g C/3
"" tt <
oj CQ u
£££
..
bo5
<4- e H
o -a o
eo3 ft.
Ifi a
Hydraulic flushing and vacuum pum
sewer lines followed by filtering the
water and sediment and discharging

"8
e
I
o
2
.a
, s
C ™
§§>
^ -S (Jg
E '5 y
lag
bll
III
















w
c
cu
1
offsite incineration and disposal of s













S
2,
o
t»











1-1
o
bo
_^
"bo
O
LO
a
CO
ui
<^-
2
T3
OJ
w
1
•o
C
CO



























£
CO
_cu
14-1
X
1
.2
•O
.a
02
"8
S
S





























c
_o
~Vi
'I
"S
CO
•u
c
CO
jf
1
o
l/>
BQ
Si
1
2




























"a
structur
inspection of the pipeline to ensure






























integrity













C
QJ
S
Z.
o.
5




01
2
CO
.CJ
"3.
o.
CO
s


1
1
bo
C
1
.2
c
_o
1
1
o



o
2






cu
c
o

^^
=
o













o
c
-§
contaminant levels in the site's well;


C "O N
SS o;
S b o



                8 E
The municipal water treatment
system will remove VOCs and v
ensure that contaminants of
concern do not exceed a 10'5
lifetime excess cancer risk and
SDWA MCLs. GW will be treat
IT >*
E "°
CO c
—i CO
E "S.-O
a 2 § bo
•S«c
.fill
S.S.8 §
&.S c E
S §•§£
Si E 2 G
13 60 K -a
e c ra c
«'«•««
bo'x o 
C CU -5 C
'1*11
3 60™ >
lit!
US g
U E.E g
"8
c
III ..g
jj s i ~ ^ S|
'^ 1 1 c ^ -2
CO g,» g^ g
•8 * § S H --
1d«ES>
SI § g^q
> „ _ « 3 «
5 s 8 S <°. y »6
w i.2 co0^ | 3
fl all Sa
fa CO CO C P i i-i























         "S Ms-§^
         S.Ew.E °
         11 a -i •§
         O >
         1
         Q
               w g g1

                   .
                       e
                      E
      W5   >

      t-i   >
396

-------
 a -a 3 « y _
 -a <« 6 " 7513

 1.11.1!
  o ^ 5 =3 5-
                                       og  t-, s
                                       S'l-  Rg
                                       a^i  K.S
                                                     - —
                                                    tv 2
                                                    _r 3
                                      I
                          c
                          bo  —
                      C" CO -U g

                      I|.N
                      f Ijs
                      I s g •§ K
                        - e °'§

                      filii
                      o " .-a 6 ^3
                      I 8 111
                        •8
                                               8 „- g. £ * 'c1

                                               S^=5 SS'g
T3
S
8.
o
                      o
                      CO
                      Ov
SI
siir^f
11 = -1»I
=5 S '» «• 3 °

^IPf.
•Refill.
                      11
                            •a
                            c
                            ro
                         oo e
                       _ c «
                       8 =3 £?
                       3 = o
                     S§ £III
                                               "S  -S »
                                               18 . '5 .S
                                               j-> s -a
                                               E .x tS .S

                                               111 .s
                                               w c a c

                                               lllf
5    |
fe    a
11   1
                      S x

                      ™P,


                      ^ S,
                      "S "*
                      So
                          5*

                          II
CO
i
                                     3
                                     ,§
I  »
a  §  s
8
1
I
I
                       397

-------
X
1
£




































1
• >
U _,
•ol
E co
CO ^C
11
3
1
X
c^
1
S
vO

J— C* 3 U
2^-° c
tn Bi o
E «
C
., w
1 8
3 E
'3 CO
« 00
S.8


*O CO
00 E
^ 'fe
\ *-
»— 1 t/5
t— 1 I— 1
















a
i
o
t_l
o
E
I
T3
E
60
£
S
I
«
3
JO
1
'E







































TJ
e
CO
£
£
CO
I
S
a
CO
"8
t>0
1
R
tn
•S







































TJ
B
1
c«
CA
•o
S
of gravel access r
|
S
8
























\  .
si
II
 I
 Ul

 I
§.€

Si
                             • -3 I ti -5 &> i
                         s s?B5 EJS5 E i
                                            I
                                  §* i E
                             C  M
                             E T3 Jj
               N M ~O
               O g '3
               tx 3 -
                  •Js 2  •"•"

^^
'is *
a| s
.2 g, $
« io 5

lo
B
b
ta
T— (
00
E
'S
•a
A
Q
•c
CO
"u
b
CO
'£
W
3
1

00
00
\
m
S
o

CO
B
E
M
                                             1  I   .1
                                             •3  i>   e-
                                             8
        398

-------
      §1
      iff
 $3
     O ^
     co —-
     co ™
O

§•1
                Jd  O Z'
                                                I
                                                 * S!
                                  •S_
                                 •" 'S P
                                 Si * b
                                                    c S
                            ag"!-8^
                           S f I £ * «
                           ^1 = ^'

                           J*|iIPr
           §
                              si
                           O »
      " —
      "O n
      x eo
        o
        o
        O
      (S O
      CN IT)
O
O
O

8"
O
O
O

of
     11
     I'll
     . 5 «
     & 8 g?
     t/3 ui O
  £?
  O
 -a  ,
                   .

                 1 II
         •   T3



         "
         « « ' 3 &
         1
         ;§ §
         a s S s
          _ ro 60 u
         51 s-s
         O E . «
         --gas
         ^ li i
                 'S
     >  CO

     a  i  2
«r-  ss  §
as  ^  E
E 1  c;
alls
                          0
09/29/87
      re  _^ —-
         .5  T
         Q  £
                      399

-------
      o -c
    i
       -2 ee
     IP
    w a

    rf 1

    w 8

                          O «

                          — CO
                          .15  £.
                                    D.
                              j a 53 ^a *.•"

                              51I*1.!


                              ill pi
                              .a oi — 53
                                 s a
                              'B B . - -a 5
                              2 |s E ?

                              in
                              "L 8*
                              * -a /
•*.


CO
•<)•
"w OJ  °.

_-£  g
                                        c3
        •s |
        i'l

        §1
                                         i
        U E

oT
to
a
t/5
^ §
1*1
State/Tj
Signature
Remedial
T^"
1
E* —
1
S
S
1
t-
Industrial


03/24/88


1
E
a
                  •fi
                     t
         O
                                                 «
                                                 c
                                                 S
I'
                     400

-------
S
o
D.



I
•a
&
     s.f
      -
                     .1  §
     o
           ltl
     1  III
     S
         1 1 .1
                    T3
                    O
T3 ^ C



1||


1| °-.


o 8 >
                    VJ

                    'I

                    •8
                    i
                        i
                               IB
                               4) B


                               if
                               sf
                               C i-3
                               B CJ
                               60
                               _C
                               e

                               o
action wit
                               o
l
                              ii.
                              i > i
                              1*1
                              8'S-s
                              «i CO "
•o?
                              S
ighland
                                               -
                                               s.a

                                                 *
                           1
                I
                           ii  .i^i*!
                           ^2  KP
    fe
    ^

    1
Final
                           401

-------
    T3
    C
    3
'S -5  'S
       05
       00
                       g-s i

                       •S 11SS-8
                       ra & o ^ e >
                        ^lUJNt °
                        si-ai<8'sU
                       SlMiHlif
                       £ 11 °. I s -a". *.
                       Pi-B.a-wSSPJS
                            a ^-e
                            o o a
                  3  8§3
                           U.
Soil, sediment, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
,
X
including arsenic, and
organics including PAHs
                     12
00
00
                   402

-------
Components of

Selected Rey
 8" .3
     o w
     o —
     in 2

     «2 c
       w


 1   1*11*2

 11
 a v
     _. .

    •£ «
 •S .
  a f. i 15 '5

.-33.S±3-§i

•§§&Il!'S
g-g S 2.S gb

u § < u bO.O«



•= TJ (U -5  C U


*1!!!II
  -   .
     i

o
in
tv
"S-S
  Mi

  I.aa
  u e of
==> a|
« o o S

•S  •£>
3  00



>?  ^

.•3  \  „
M  ^^  ^

                8  g
                          0
                               § § -E i
                            ? §§£ s
                            a o" o" o s
                              5 -a
                              00 C
•13
                          E ra^
                            i  .1 1 S J
                             u C  _

                             [2-2  S

                             u 2  'E —
                             CO)  0) t?
                              UH  O
                      403

-------
e-a a
S § q
> _ 0
S 3 "s
!#s

J9
a.
3
c
8
u





%
*- £•
°*8
S3 E
ss
P
IS
! 3 3
\
i
i
)
|
i
? «
' i
4 "r"
, P
3 >
J V
•< v.
J a
5


E
I
\
K
|

S? C
i&s'l
(M 5T ^
Sf |3
slfl
K S .§> g
tt S
c
c
'5
t
A
g
2" |S
:? ?
= ^ "ra m — - •«
'5U^ 5^"o6 S^1
Iliili !
— b S oo ^cs-o
lsl||l|H«
|p:|r^»i
5 EcxSS^,,, >;3
^ 3 ^ 1 o ^ g i =3 2 ^
Ic^'g^Mfl^l
".E-^ NJ2_ «:- S
rs§^lgg^'g|gi
c/5M'n.Sj5So3w<3S:
= & 3
•g 1 -^ 85
4 ^s^ |&u
Is §- s g^
S ° -S -2 'g 1 B
E S g g -a c E
-'£ &c fflT3£
'S 0 « .2 -5i ^ ^3
™ .. u c ° «
*S 13> u « ° = M
° c: § 'c1 c .2 g
I 11^ 2 § §*
•5 4_. *6 "i3 .S ^ <^^
iirlMi
l|2|lii
60^3 C [7 .2 K to
o QJ o "a o -o
"3 "8 S -3 s;^ '3
•s S S « C" C o1
•° « S .- <3 « =
.§ I b | 8 i- s
w) w T3 -g o o ^ O
8^ §•
S^ S-i
rq-S in &
5
S ^
^•s a g
18 '> n S -5.
"^0 | ^
|l>|-s
•§ S H » w
*^ ••• to c i.r
a; c ro .s: QJ
"1^'S |
? §?1l
t/a b 0- .S 2
nj DO
•n C
1 't
"a v
as i. i i
r- 4-r -n ^ cb' fe
•S oj X ™ Sa .
IS I'S S a
Z  ft, O t-i

vO

O _.
MO C
£•8 "
r^ p,
§S ;

W
1
a
ro
s s
bo
U e
io .2
1 '^
2l
J3 O
tJ u
*•§
a «
S X
ill
&s S,
BUM
&l §
•a 5 -a
•3 -a 5
a§'s
« x .2
2 (U T3

"8
ta

M
O
2
•S
'?
"§ 60
I.E
.S "a
E-r
2 S E
C •- 3
JH
181
E
•2
I
6
is

vO

 2   ^
 e   S
• s   «.
 1   S
CO
       al
        c
        § 2
      Ja -3-3
      
-------
" S «=
sll
§3o
a.





£
o.
3
§
0


cision Summary Table
Components of
:lected Remedy
Q *
*
1
ai
g
E i
g !
fc I
e
s
I
>
1



4? §
lJS'1
Seg-S
D a s TS
.5 B S a
M a.ig
wj A
c
o
•&
00 S o
3 si t
sal
B
-SP
1-8
u 2
s ° "
e X-S
.£ 66 S
.1 E
'S W "S
~* . m
!°t
|l|
E-" u 2

S 5?
treatment using electrochem:
sinjection; and site monitoril
TJ =
c .c
i a
a?
E M
3 TJ
a.C
S U
5 e

"8
e
1
1
£
'g
"§ 60
ra c
.S =3
£2
1 = 1
8 -le
> s g
5 ti b
5 e-g
E
_a
c ^
6 .g
1^ 1
Sa 1


^D
ctf
^* "c3 o ""*
K -g. 8- i
tfS sS






1
M— I
I
W5
S
c
•n .2
gO. T3
Is « a
'§ T, -g I-B
2 g * 3^
C bo O.
8 c.s>-s
CJ « > C
^ | o o S
I -S y - S
S 2 .-H"u v
S8|II
« a S ~z b
S -| S § T,
= ° e "Sc
co .« en «
CJ V *^ -1 -T-l
t. BO C 3 ^
" -a o P S
•a 3 o fe ra
c T/I x G cr ..
^2 _ •& 3 c g,
al «£>£ «
.ti ™ ""• c & _e
g -- « •— 03 u
O w O Sa fa -3

"8
tc
1
(A
^J
O
r°f -
0 B
, P s
c > E
O j-
U "S TD
= 5 S
•S3 tf
c w 3
a e o
•^ *s '^
> P M
0 1 S,


„ 5
I 1 g £ 1
£ , c 5j b
" -a ^ CJ •
« n 2 ov «
0 (N O 0 £


•0

o B
tfll
w £r s

jj .§

* "O c > 2
CL, D S « £
III°!I
^i^^ sJ!
e ••• *H "t3 c ^3
H *J *^ ™ *C*
- « 'S g s I
A « u £ -3 5
111 1
— s o _ s M
o 8 8 o S fi
t/j Qj co t/5 .5 H
_.
IB « g>
on of contaminated surface
id drainageway sediment wii
if residual ash; placement of
ish and revegetation; and
collection and treatment usii
in
g S ° ra > .2
5 "" ^ > X
8 g, S Ji o r
•S -o | & -n S
U5 L4 C *O
.C "w s 
O Ox J? O


vO





^ "8 v!
p * w
c g c
CS *- t»
: u ™^
o g w
sil
HI
Jill








J2
a
&
00 C
OS c
in u r
't ii «









"a
c
b
(A




405

-------
.a
 8
I
r>
tj -o a
113
ill




W3

0
O
c.
3
C
CO
ai
_£
U



Components of
Selected Remedy
P
c
3
"3
QJ
VI
OJ



OJ
1
PH
•co
£
E-
fcl
llo |
£€3 & S vj -S
1
•SlSt
2 Eo
m -a '"'
™ e co
2 « e
T3 SP °
l^-g_
« " g?.*
JJ _ -* w
s I VE
*|Bg
S3 tJ g d
Q CO O ca
W U 1-1 U
Consolidation of offsite contaminated soil with
onsite wastes and surface soil followed by in-
situ stabilization and installation of a concrete
cap over the fenced portion of the site and a
RCRA-clay cap placed in the south field;
decontamination of warehouse with resultant
solid wastes combined with soil remediation
and wastes treated and discharged into sewer
system; offsite disposal of drums and equipment
not adequately cleaned; offsite disposal of water
not meeting discharge requirements; and
cleaning and sealing sumps



•a 'u
>• 00
*>.!
23
1 -
«J S
•a js 3i

•gig1
"•s'-5
u" S S
00 CO U
•ace
3 •— —
"»> m —
co ^5
111
S
_- £•
.§ i
C CO
r fe
CJ —
-c *a °° 2
U .g » .5
S3 i ^ ^
1 2 ^ S


0=1
« ^
co O
t^- 'I~^ —M
rfl s 1
N- §• ^- i
Si S-S
!
2 -a
2 2
-o b oo
01 o ^/
(0 OO'Si
8^^
£E9
u q 5
J3 O rH
X
S ° ¥>
= ^H jg
? M =3
_ JC CO
'3 < "3
C/5 dn 5
Excavation and temporary storage of soil in an
onsite RCRA facility; construction of a road
over excavated areas and existing roadway to
provide access to site area; and temporary
relocation of residents during excavation


**1
•g.
o
o
o
•*"
£
*>
*.8
5 c
III
•= o <
6-X3 P-
2 e oo
c to c
8^
Igl
"TO
U
s£
1 H t^
6 | g
2 a §
s s, ^
a, t/a o


o 3
« n
o u
K? ||
*-'§• S- g
Si S5.
^
o.
3
s
"o
u
 .1
« "« ^
g>.a o
'^ll 1
TD g g IN
S 115 1


                                                             8.3
                                                             CO CL
                                                             oC S
                                                             o
                                                             c

                                                             S 2

    .8 ^  2
   !•« e 151
    .a s £  a
   C JS > ^- V  rt *^
00 "• U
c E «
O "" u
- -a .2
-C C W5
™ ^ T-l
C C
O 'C a
!•§ s
CO c *.;

Sl8
I
                                                                       E

                                                                     •gl
                                                                     § 2
                                                                CO ^
                                                                .5 B w
                                                              Sa§^11

                                                               g
                                                               •g.
                                                               1/1
    I

    CO
    'C
                                         406

-------
u
       a-8*
                £«!
     W O "« <9

                   '§'
'S  ^ J2  2 O -a s
85  5 Ta  o c; c E
^•^  co *—'  co O to cj
        °o  P3
       ' C  U
       1 (0  ft,
1 M"§1
« -a  « -S

lI|g.S
-Ills
•5 E -u 2 go
w S .E S o
                              "8
                              1C

                              1
                                   o
                              -C

                              s
                                     „ § js .a
                                     5?  to c
                             CJ y] 
-------
•8
tc

I
o
if

II,
B e S
 ?> S
   S

  H «-"
xg a
jjj 55 «
"co « >
> E "«

1M
^ S
               g
               •a
                  i-is
                  Si.1
                  t- £ C
                  (Q  ™
                1  I
                                I
          U W

          *S 3J


          1 E
          = v
                                   I
                                   i
                                1
            S-S « i
  o
  'S
CO C
,1 'e -O
va E c
•o 3 S
ecu

1 8 8.
X g X « u t?
f §?P -3s
  w a S-6 e
" 2 2 a 'i K
'S i. £ Jj -3 fe
   K S S ?
                                1
                                o

                                IS
                                   1B

                                Sill
                                 CO
                                 CO

                                 £
                                             01
                                             1

                                             I
                                             S
                                             1
                               o R*
                               2 <8
                                             S
                                             'E '•
                                             t>0
                          |1

                          J? °

                          ^§
                                             z  a

                     409

-------
 J2
•a
         |
         o
         o
     fr



     1


£    S
§    •§    o*
CO    £    O
                              'a
                              '5.
                    "8
                    1C
                            I
                            c
                            5P
                            M
                            c1
                            12 ^
                              if
                    H2 "3.
                    £-0
                   S S



                   "S
                   cs

                   I
                   g§:
                           X
                           o
t-l    ^
S    js
1-1    H
     Snj
.     .S

i   ^

i   «
                                  So    g
                                  °. S   ^.
                                          1
                                          o
                                          c

                                          1
                                          CO


                                          8
                                          u

                                         S
                                          00
                                          c
                                                 o    "
                                                           & 2
                                                           r"7  =
                                                           8
                                                           o
                                                         I
                                                         o   S
                                           410

-------
iii
> — 0
*-* S *5
S "S, §
CU
Cleanup Goals




•*
^^
Components of
Selected Remedj


V
E
1
CL
V,
•2
5


9.
&
8
ex
n
n
£
£

\ E
^ s.s
flT Tj fO *•
e e-Q %
co C" cu _
2 fe; s«
a § «1
'& « .1 1
C/3 (2
B
O
•E
<
cS
f
U JA
8 oil
° °- ? Si.
§£ o S ^
go £ S <-.
,- 8 n J<- 8 S S
*N C S ^ v- *X CO
Sl&i 5£>oA
O v^
O O fe e
£•» is*-!
1.3 .2 -3 I M g; |
^"SSluSS-s^
f'-^^-lgae,;
ll§§8s-§Ms
_«-a-=i>'2E,E£g
gSssfi.g'.fSsl
v'ScjS.E's0iijj£°,3.
| § £?£? g 3 ™-S f2^
.sis32 Is li s
miiij^i
all^sl^ll
c/T ^-i
CU T3 E
60 0 Jj CO
"co S ° cj if — r
•o ff^'S S E
'B | i & g> a §
t».« e ° = -s jj
-S ^ tS -3 S <" "
= feg §.§.*«
•§ g'^s " ° 5
M •= .S ^ CU C |g
Illllf!
" _ S & M "• CO
g ^ 2 =i S -a 1
" w u -a 3 'G .S
iiasBsii
"ot-Ecuel--n
lilllsll
I^iSSssi
K 1 S 1 g ? S .ts
WCS.SuM^co

f)
"R
o
o ™
•* 9
OS ^
^
'1
•a »o
S B "0
« "" S
E 3 ra
1 ^"S"
1 8^
Si .-.1
•3&5.S
t/3 O (X T3
&b
E h oo
•a e c
o § •§
0 0 & _
Si ^ ffi ^,2
" K £ « E
1 ^1 S ^
IP §11 1 1



\o


Q tfl ._ 60
0 ¥E<
!^il!
u &*>. ^- .;- ~ 1/1
.p ^ 
8 -c
±•5 S
=5 S3
« T3 U
T3 S §
E a 8
co c 6<
5 '§ •§
0 2 §




5 S
g 
-------


















Record of Decision Summarv Table
8
&
%
^



















O C £
1 "o
sis
|ag






J2

O
O<
S
C
«
5




Components of
Selected Remedy
CJ
E
3
1
flj
•C
WS
fO
£


o
T^
S
(x
"i>

£
£§
<"" 5? S ' o
S c <

s?il
IB |1
« W3 .60 §
W3 OS
C
0
'Eo
S
s
K^ Og
H 11
£ & Kg
^2 o °9 ra

In-situ neutralization of the acid sludge wasl
followed by construction of a soil cover ovei
the waste area; institutional controls includil
deed restrictions; GW monitoring; and
completion of feasibility study addressing the
subsequent sediment and GW operable unit

l!
S 3
CO -,
~t;
eo -a
c '0
•8| «
•M 3 y
•ill
Lil
§ S-2
0 E? i

» ° »
•§.-§3
!/J S O.
.11
& "° §
n £ s
^ ,* «s
i a -Is- §
id i^E o?
CQ C 3 i T3 CS
ll !§J i


t-x
      0 g
      VI f
      :
      (B
      S
No action remedy. EPA has determined that
lacks authority or jurisdiction to undertake
cleanup of onsite petroleum wastes that are
being released in significant concentrations
     Z a
     < Q
 Ilfl!
                   ,
                  •8
                  a
                  c
                  _o
                  1
                  o

                  o
            o
                  i- >;
                  ij c
«>
•a 3
            ra
            'I
S  S
412

-------
O
0.
9
B
    II
     ii ii 11 I
       -       1
     Elllll
     I
     o
     Jf
     "3.
     §
     «S
     U
bo
C
'C
3
    S
     s
    o
                  I -II
                   5
           1171
           K -g 1 -g
           •a o-f S
           •S a = 2
           -•S * u
           O j_,
              -s
           60
           a 2
                  o
                  •S


                  •8
                  S
                  b»
                  5 a
                  o E
 •o > B ,£ S
 S § .2 j? .3
 ™ -s O \ e
« _. TfJ o bfc C
5 Tg £ * E 'S

!Sfl«s5
£BH3l
>> QJ ^ WS  ^
1M1||
l^.ai-?t
                              •BJU
                              18 e c
                              •a w o js
                              IF
                              _.- e
                       3 u •-
                       3 .E ffi

                       ^1

                        II
                        3 3
    o .S 7 S -g =
    I jfl SI ".1

    Blllt-8
      S3 £:, o aft P
    ||&iP§
    5 12 s .£ 53 o
    ^ C n  e u

    aj&l^.i
      ° = _ v> _O
                              "8
                              o
                          .1
                       > I ^ I»
                       Slil-a
                                  •c
                           60
                           B
                           'E
       oC
       O
                         413

-------
Cleanup Goal
Components of
Selected Remedy
'
           -
          c  o
          "  —


            d    •-
            >S &
             — cj O
            "5 '3 c
         -a S sf
          g S -s f
         —, 'S ra 2
                  CO
                  \
                  <5
         6

S
I!
£
Discharged GW will meet NPD
guidelines. GW treatment will
3

2;
u-
o
$ s
S.2

S3
Extraction and offsite dischargi
continue GW extraction and cc
•o
V
I
t/5
O
z
£
'g
•8
I.s
'i 1i
c c
8'"
f

meet MCLs and EPA Health
Advisories, and withdraw the


•a
3 i
cu *^
z >>
(^ "H.
0 §•

from well-3, with offsite dispos
provision of an alternate watei









1!
                                                                                                        co

                                                  414

-------
o

I
        111
        -S O S"
      I
      1
       o
          I
      isl
       ra c c

      =§ e &
      5 2 S
       O
       I
           8
                  1

                  I
o
          •8
          tc

          I
                             E 'S

                             2 2
                               '
          'o o a
          t/5 > E
          i
I
a
                                           O „
              "8
              c

              I
                                           o
              i   I
              rf   3

                                               u   ~   —
                                        1
                                        w

                                        o
|

!
                                                           o

                                        ^ a    «

                                        g§- i

                                        SI  2-g
                                        =5 e  4! S
                               .
                              ~ >5^  >
                               5 >  g
                              U3 C« ^
 o
 ra O

Si
                                                                       o
                                                                       CO
                                                                 s
                                                                 Ov
                                                    §   ,2
                                     415

-------
s
o
a.
3
c
IS
D
O
lS"S
t/5 > w
        •
        11
1
oo


I
                        _e   V
                        •S  ^a
                        '5 «'e
                          •o o
                        •y 'c g
                        £ o ^
                        (0*^*0

                        11 s

                        !§•§.
                        o e-S
                        u o 
-------
•* I 8
sa 8 <=

'!is
S — g

•- o 8

» •a'b
•o a --1
§ g w
s g-s
<8 S'S
    = T3 M

^fig^
10 ^ u to"
"§ 1 'S S - -r «

j: a a b s -S l
•ff *3 ?s J3 be W u
O O ^-* >3 £• V S
ft 8 > o S S..S
  O
       Ml
       ^C


       z
     OJ U

     •3, JS
     U 3 .


     '
§  S
                   its
I   «
£  i

1&&
CB C *•"

1^1
IK

8-al

SH
                                        B
                                          «.
                                          o
                       u. C
C C  \  t3
SO  o?  C

S ee  o  N

                                  1
                                                   li
                                        1
                        417

-------
U
    O

    83
    E
    s
    ~ o
    t/5
          I
               -f §3.l2'
                        J2
               §1
= ls
itf
w o -a
£ s

                         11
           1.
           1!
           Is
           o >
                           u
              u .S

              ll
                                        w '-
                              •c
eg   u
C/3   ^2 ^v


li  II
                                  g
                   I  «
                              8 S
                       418

-------
  R.S
 o
"53
 E
 s

 8 s
— *
t/5 'a
 .
•S 2
  ">

, I.?
4; 
-------
§ II
sal
H
               sf
                     ^^ sa a
                     tl-M-a
                iifSsiJll^
                   J^I1I*1
   1
£ a y
*-• f
               O .-3
               sl
                   o
                   O £"J

       III
                                  e   ^ w _. •§ g g
                                  $"S If 111 s"s
                                 aj-^ 3t«T3"u *-••! O *u
                                 'S " S  . S3 -S  - -^
                                 = J= J1"^" J2
                                 S a a -g|
                                     ffl ^
                                 o
                                 E | = g •
                                 "81.8 I •
      ifi
      M
      fS
                                     OJ
                                      =
                                         ON
                                         o
                                            1
                                            b

                                            to
                   420

-------






































dj

H

Threat/Problem
> c
. ffl .2
4? r? U
SQ <
cH-T QJ — i
I il
<55 .S? 1
c/> S
B
O
'5o
S
g
rx
f^
cs":=
S.€
_r S
51

B
CO
s
JZ
s b
•S .>
4-1 ^
3 >
aj "P
s]
2 |
j; *-
CX e
O E
|l
f B
H .=

li
|-£
E TO
9
H a
Ja: 3
^ a
" S
CO u
w £
"2 s
Construction of surge po
Portal; construction of cc



1 a
ta
o g
CN -S
SW, sediment, and GW
contaminated with
j:
_o
3
O
California
CO


00


- S
«
u 1







I







ll
•si
« |
a u.
^^
w S
U-l
O  t_i
H
•8 S
00 «
B V
'13 O
3 e
P o
DO '3
•o 2
tunnel recharge areas an
fractured rock; implemen



























5
O
o

&.
oT
network to detect leakag

























.E

S
_E
•a
B
CO
a.
E
a.
U_i
O
E
migration; and installatio



























Ui

£5
QJ
bo
a
s
treatment should surface







metals including
cadmium, copper, lead,
and zinc

CJ

U3
3
00
B
'E
S







03/29/88















1
Z.
2












2
0
m
^r
S
5

£
1
^
B
S
*•
>
•p
it
i
E
1
c


V
c
'E
T3
'u
CO
1-
£
s
1
c
u
i
c
N
.1
S

"8
(C
I
W
^j
S
Possible contamination
u
CO
cy
•2
M
<
^
U
1


00


^-N
"1
O.
~s



3
O
il
S
,-2
£•
1
'3
S
u
•u








drainage discharge







of sediment, and
downstream SW and




8
j«r






_
L/)
V)





























3.
s
CO
E?
o
_E
jB
1
U




09/30/87



S
2S
_
CO
3
B
B
-S


































t



       ta



     H
     13 w
     c "o
         J
         '5.
     c ro QJ

     .2 •"
       •"
       QJ 03

         ^
     t/5 O 2
     o
       2

     cG

     8-S


     81
     •a a
     c ra
     ra c


     11

          •
     08  a
                      8
•5
•g
111
                        O-
        r^
        CO
        i.
                      Ij5p  ^   -s
                      U --- U  O   TC
421

-------
(























sljf
1||
C
(A
1
O
ex
c
u
«- A
°^S
12 e
§tu
a.
P
O
S$
V
S
3
1
u
1
E
u
3
s
s,
t5
§
s
£§
|S'|
€§3
0? d •£
3 IE
wi .S? S
C/3 K
C
,c
'5
S
c:
o «
S,
•S
'|

1
1
03
C
1
xcavation of conta;
w
rH
^t-
o
g
_o
1
B
CO
c
§
T3
Si
2
o
M
2
'i
0
OJ
00
2
0
CA
QJ
2
1
_e
x>f and placement
c
'55
d
o
•g
g
d.
S
60
C
laintenance of exis
fc
1
U.
,0
^
*o
JS
ca
S
c
3
£>
'u
^s
OJ
2
s
W
^
o
^j
•«(•
LO"
T— (
_QJ
3
JS
'S
isposal becomes av
•o





*ra
a
.—
^
cy
*w
ti
o
"ra
c
tc
8
•s 8
s^
•a.s " a

! |l|
slit
e
3 to
       K

       ^

       0?
  n p  o?   -s
  >— • O  o   in
                                           B
                                                    S

ill
« A D<
                   T3

                  i S
                6  0
                .2 „ 0
                    S  fe
                fe o .2

                S8-1      ^
                4J ,-T o   os  •£
                O v_^ J   O  VD
                                   C «J

                                   (  .t
                                   18 c "S
                                   J-'l g a
                                   c E  o


                                   M-i-i
                                   ^5 O -5 C
                  o
                  c/3
tu -5 tu
-a ? TD

                  > T3   ro

                  S S   ^
                  Q O   O
                                                     •a
                                                     V
                Oj "O


                C g,


                1 "S
111
                II
                Q O OH
       fe


       1   •
       O   tV
                          422

-------
ti •« a
1^
sis
QJ D. J
I3

_«
c
C

C
CC
a





j
4
•l

o-S
£3 E
is
11
6V
y




V
1
"rt
£
&
cfl
5
s


p
s
e
OH
>

-C
p

Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
o
'EC
JT
«
i
o i
0 O
^ c? —
N""I| O g
t> '5, 8 c
sl si
£1-
111
111


»*I
i — °-
til
V rr* ™
s; F P
T3 "M T3
* c 5
ra
c B c
ill
C N c
Big 8
•*~ CO lu
o a o
lg" 8
6 .0 *a
-S2 £3 ^
all
g" 8
0 ° a
c-Sl
s t- c
™ ^ o
r" O
o "° b
**3 ^Q rt
W C X
85 l«
S S a §

13
*** T7 '•"*
•?, « :§ a
-p ^o c
8s o ii§
°- S o ^ '3
tv OS 





"8
IB
I
s
*
00
B
•a
2
1
CL
trt
8
4~l
C
8
1
CO
y;
1
«
1

> OJ
1) BO
2 CO
CO i«
E s
a =s
^ 1

1
^
I
CA
S
z
1"H
CO <8
, £? u-
c o &
8 •£ §
^1 |
O T-I so
?1 1=1
« S ^ a
_ •§ ^ £?
•g E 75 O
5 S .S .5

Libby Ground
Water, MT
09/26/86
1st

CO

423

-------
u
 _g
      £ll
             8^
      8
Si
                                      8
                                o
                                CO

                                d-


                                E
                                                      -      -

       8
       o
                                                     o
              .S cs .S o
       1
       1
                                                     1
S   2
•a   
-------
    O
    O.




    I
. S 2 Ji
153 a.§§
        1
        s
       I

          ff
o

1
111,

W
>cd e E u .
SlsSits
oli|t§

l4*«
" — 2 8 S" "• --
<§ 11 g 11 k
               • •a
               "
                   61
  ill-!
  =5 8 I 3
liiiM
              'ii
&
'E
!S f-
> =

£ tf
8'fi
•g 8.
•i 2
S (x
                 S
                 e
               I
               to

               I
                               •a m
                               S M
                               2 -£

                               1 =
                               O E
               s 's
               J-S
               JS E-
              |
                                 Q
                                   O 3
                                        ll-st
                            1
                            •a

                                            1il"H
                                            .s o n ra
                        •1
                        1
                         U)
                        I
                        I c 8
                        -n'i
                        3 73 g?
                                       u 5
                         2

                         1§

                         II

                        425

-------
o
a.
3
u
                     -
                   § "3 ^
  s -g -
E S a -
«b §
s .S || fi -S «-


          III
     M_.   -   -0
           -a      oo
           S      .E

         £ I g>    1
         •S '5 « "2 "u

         S 11  ™ -s
         = T3 -S

         5  g '5
             S

          1  8.
           0   S
           "   s
                 v

                 S 60
                               5
                          o   .-.
                                   g
                                   in /-<
                                   vo" 2

                                      '
S
1
•a
c
CO
I
2
s
X
w
.«
•5
a;
2
1
c
u
c
CO
s.
•o
c
CO
c
o
Excavati
<*i
TD
5,
8
o
o"
^-


c
8
'5
w
•o
C
CO
O
c"
S
c
3
@
u
IU
bo
bo
tr>
i- c c 5 r
CiJ CJ l_i rh -^
co S ¥ ° "3.
MNI
_ -2 gj 8 u
l|f |s
5**-Bl
•J^jf ».§
itlli
>%
1
(A
I_i
OJ
1

c'*
ill




s
^
8^2
Standards
GW pump and treatment Not specified
n with discharge to river;
u-1
I
>4«l
0
bo
C
M
9J
Rechanr
c
CO
£
u
cu

§
U


c
8
1
T3
C
CO
O



U
S
*u
£
1
c
_o
1
<^j
CO
e
5
-g
S
•S
'5
T3
>%
O

o"
o
t^
s.
c
CO
r construction

-------
.9


II
         8-
         S
         °
               « X
               — 60
J»
Q.
C
O








14- >>
°"S
£3 £
c 
W S t/5 O B! H .-i
>-¥ §
42 Q C
60 & _P3
•* =3 T3 V
** „,  BO «
S-S S-g^ §
_- d w — * ™
l|l|ll
5 E to g  ra > to J3 >
S S S E -a S
X O X O C ><
W o u u to S
       J3
       .—       w

        5 w     2

       •OK   « Ji
        v ^   c E u

        eo *P 
  .
'0 "0
-a =
S "g
a. .5
                   o\

                   ^
                   CK
        E
S
oo 5?
0 0 « °
88 Is II
">-«.§§ in i
SS£?| Ss
c i? § ><
*S « a §•
E 2 I | -g
•§ §• ! .s s
All contaminated soil a
wastes will be cleaned
below one area percen
using polarized light m
and at or below backgi
levels for nickel
rtT
OJ
« £
•g 'oD »0
re 60 S '0 4-r
Excavating and consolidating asbestos-
nickel-contaminated soil and debris;
constructing onsite underground waste
management unit (WMU) and disposin
contaminated soil in WMU; capping W
regrading excavated area; decontamina
debris; monitoring soil moisture conten
air, and personnel; and implementing
institutional controls

o .,
O n *~*
18s -1!
Jr w -S *e S3
fx QJ t- ^ y
s a 1 g 1
jy m
- i-llp
-§^° i fe ?-S
liliafi
3 ^ 3 5 g !
i>^agu^
'e M & "S ~ D-
aS-s §£ | g
c M a « i- i a
8^^°§^
n^nai
., ^ -a
*«§!?.!
o^^3|^
Excavation and offsite disposal of lead-
contaminated soil; continued operation
GW pumping and treatment system for
upper aquifer; pumping and treatment
from upper aquitard and lower aquifer
air stripping; offsite discharge of all tre
into infiltration basins or irrigation can
GW monitoring
   w    -a

 c  §1   S


 SS^.S
 M  r* flj U us

S -g -g g J ss

l| 'S & 8 I

T!  a g>g g>^

 S.ilbl&

'g  B I ^ -3 .§
5  2 .E o .S E
                                  i u TJ .s;
                                 c > c ~A
                                                  .«
— •
•s c a  aj

5 2.S  E
                                            .

                                                 S   S
                                                                          I
                                                                         •8
                                                                         31   ^
                                     427

-------
•£
I
c









































v y
If
Si ^
'& 1





•8
a
2
'S.
3











'o
c
OJ
c

1
S
wi
S
o
a
3
TO
OJ
u



^
*s
u


g.'S
E
0






















£
s
li
v5










OJ
E
D
O
w
Vi
1

u
XI
Threat/Pt


§
S'O
3
V _
5.S
11
.2? S
C/3



(2
E
O
'&

00
CO
CO
in
g
co"
V)
1
5
.2
1
!3
10
Q
""
M
>
.S
1
t4_l
O
.2
•a
ffl
g
o

K
Ctf
•a
B
18
B
O
•a
J8
>
S
X
tL)

1

!

^

B
8
1
T3
B
10
1
6
-~
'i
|
6


Ov

"TO
'E
18
>ii
&
1
W
h2
5
•—
c
•§
18
g








_
8

"§
15
c

'E
W
c
o
u






^
1
•B
1
c^
_B
£









i
1
O
•a
TO
^
^
V3
TO
1
U


























1
E
J
60
_C
^
_c


1
CO
\
0




o
o
o
rC
ft
$
'S
D
0
Cfl
O
^
^
C
1





























^u
'E
re







S
°
'tfl
3
B
B
S
g
_g

.a
.^^
^
S
1
U

































1
'£
 a u o
   .. _ « •= P
                         J8
1|
  I
  ii
ij
^ S
o &

g I
'O ^
8'i
^8
£2 M
                1
o
                  1-g
!S E -3 =
5 2 .S-g
                                         cs 'o,
                                         s 3
                                         ^i m Q
                                         u S K
                          8
           428

-------
            o,

            I
    •s.5?0
S 2-§ fc^o;

 7  -3 •*• 3 .g

I 2 .s -s » I

^  -a S og


   S«gl
   .* CJP"
5
II
     "a

     'B
             1
             E
•g
ra
                  •go
                    ^iSi
                   _ ^ a O. «j
                   '" E W > b
                   c 3 "- > C
                   O Q, ra O 5
           W '
            I «.i|
            •§•§ sE
            1 S'S5

            ||B2
            o a-a c
            s e 8 w

            fir«i

            3-Hl
            •a B 3 c
            c S -3 5
            O -C C  o


                            HHlBB
                            0 c -a S .E H £
                                fig
                                                QJ r~t


                                                §i
                                                a S
                         'i-S S
                         "3 Cu ^-<
                         5 & o
                        ra C


                        ., o
                                         »s
                                         •§ 2
                                  • Q.
                                   c;

                                  I
                •— ^••TL « c .„»•- e
               eou-^«^aSo
               e !2 M ., — .2 e « -a


               lillUPI
                         I
                         C/3


                         I
Si c

PE
u
C w
o g


ll
                             K I
                                  S
S
E
                                 E £  S S S
                    429

-------
"5 -g a
o c g
^ _ a
d -S US
I

o
a.
1





•»
^H ^*
a E

§.!
o QJ
"S
:
>

i
> (U
B
M
11 "5
! ^
' i)
* 
* S?



§
S
1

_C
PH


*~. -52s
••3^pj=4-1
O S o
.2 '5, §
u O. t.
S'E^
2 "° 3
S .b o*
" 5 ™
l^t
> S 2 i
1 g «c
I g 1 *
O •& *O C/3

13
 2 T3
8«^«
"1 «1
•a a E i S3
C CO S X.3
CO E ^ X E
a E 1 -a &
$ 3 .S a 0
g>
§rz3
U
"™s t2
|^ | 8 1
|| 1 S s
BO. A r-l ^H
Ov
0 «»
o ,-* O
o " 8 _
oo g o o g
S § H 8' 1
oo" o, S mm
w S ? tfi -S
"H "™"
1 2^
— ri 3
ei^
^2cg*
.E"S^S =
g"«Sfe
™ js w y °
|| |l?
li.li:-
illil
"§
w c S
^ O ft

Q. wa OJ
•fi'g-S
to 4) >^ £
'3 '3 B ^
%£ '1 "
E^-l 1

I's!>!
gj « -p '2
||| i

g » Q
I'll ^
o<§8 i

"O
S

(A

o
z
.g
p

IS3
E!
2 "u

U yj &
&• ^s "O
O > §
j£
VI V]
5 1
TJ _;
c i -i ^
.i2 3 S  c S

              i o -i 11 &
              j M 3 O &-•§



              JlllS J
              ! ^ B g -g Ji
              ; a S •=< -S -3
           §.11
           S
           I Mlllli
              i > D, vS w O,
           o
           C >


           u •£
                O ;*

               c7^-!
               S 5 e

           _c


           E



           ^—'


        «  a
OH  6



5  3
430

-------
*-SG.^E™
                £jg|j°2§<3 = .a

                ^gfpl^^H
                ^0^|-|8^|!
                E-HU «'C.Eoin'Si2
                            •.
                            3
                              T3
               fi
                            S .->*. U 01
                             o _
                             *a
           'g.S
            '" 'u D. u c A, ta TJ
            g-asg-gl - s

            sl.t!l°|l
            •= E^J c — Jt> E -6
             - a .Si S -° 3 n
                •3 .H -p o. o
                S E £ p -p

            niiili!
                   |l.i°
            03-|-  •-"
                           X



                           I
                  01

                  I

                  ffl
                  w

                  a
                  13
                  oo
                           8
                           O ,
8

o
•a
c
™
   (X)
   C
  sl

il!^
2 "i '2 „-
  5 c9 ci-
llfs

ill!
.E K o a,
                               60
                               c
                               •a
 _o
 "5
 v
T3 e
C «

" 2s
w .S C
Si I
               - E
                g-o'i
                Ifl
                111
                               & S.  §  S
                                                 O
                                                 a-g
                                                 s s
                         431

-------
I
    I 5?

    If
    a <
OH

| g

I |

1 I
•u
B
M
              II tfl ^| B5
              SflS^lSl
              SilLMl
                                o
                                0"O
                                SS

                                Si
                                •a-a
                                lill
                                3
                                a"
                                •
IS §  -2  S S 42
                     432

-------
DC C
C O
•s ~a
sSSJfifafl
y; U ffl « C 'O W C 18





•° ™ g « J

1 v e ° i

s s is»
o." g-a =3


^gl|

o^ I g o

gllJ-S-S
a S <• s» "5
1 E -a ^ S
 ; o c
 i >- ™

 i •S s
   e 5
      !=§
Q S
o

1/1

co~
*  I

§  |
                         1
                   c  0 Si
                   u e ra i

                   "SSt-a
                   *- T3 P 3
                   4J ft c 6
                   QJ W 4-j 60
                   a-g S &
                   = 2 .S g
                   * w e I
                   S^l!

                   1-8 §1,


                   iiin
                   5« 8.S i.
                   ^
                    ..S

                   | o

                   °"§
                   s ™
                     u
                   1
                   o
                   2
                   "111
                   c E '- «
                    5  £
                           CO
                                 §1  8
                                   D,
                                 1
                                 CO
                                 _e



                                 2
2 .
c gi
3 -S
o o

So
                                      CO
                                      oo
                                                      o
                                                      CO
           $8-3  S 3 12
           all  °- g S
           S^i  55.>b
                                            •8
                                              -S •§
                                            I'
                                                 co^i  g  :
                                                 s g^  §  -^
                       433

-------

£ £
B U
01 (J



l!
•i
s
      •a
      c
      re
    •8J8
     « o
     c a,

     E =

     I I
     S.S-S

        «
     sit

     !&§.
     B 60S
     8-S.S
     QJ (M CJ
     K 55 j§

     11
     t^ "cU
     c .E

     8*
     "•
               81-  s
                               -sl  as
               1
                 U-i


                 1 |


                 |B
                 § ™
                 o «>
applicable
                    a
                    ;c
                    5
                    3
                   S  ^^S
                   •a  o e
                  • g  o jj
h continued
                                                   B5
                               1
                              o
                                                 II
                                                 CO '£
                                                 ii
                                                 I
*,K-

li|I
•si i I
E re £ a
S S c "§
O re'-a ra
0 •£ S w"
•^ 1 .5 ^
                                    &
                                    u
                                    'c
                                    3



                                    L
                                  o e
                                                  &
                                                  CO

                                                  o
                                                  Z
                  g  1
                                                1
                  O

                  •s
                  O
                                                    3  §  2
                           434

-------















CD"
I
a
33


i-gf
lj!6
._. «i , 	
£.5 2
"u o- o?
I13
«
1
O
ex
3
C
S
o
Components of
Selected Remedy
CD
3
£
tu
IS
1
"S
1
1
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
_o
"So
I
o
o
o
o"
  w *
8i
o ~

          J2
             8 8 -g | « | § g1
             ifJ ifrl
             3 |
             •53 >
        "8
        s
        &
             JBt
  g>
  '
ra
<*
S,
        t 3
        I 1
                to O
                                §1
                             •s:
                       111
                       fa ^ e
ent using
followed
t plant an
GW pumping and treat
light/chemica oxidation
                            "S

al o
al treat
ted GW
to the regi
reuse of t
                             M
                       J
                             .
                            O > a
 s
l!
2
                435

-------
     111
     gl
E

on
       is
o
1
I
I

LT
O,
00
              sfS
     in
     0
                S
                **"
               18 11 E
               g 3-g S
.E i- c ~S
S3 7 .§ |
c 8 a .a.
« o 2 3
&Z "'c
I 3 ff.S
a 3 jS-u

^ I J2 1 £
U OOTJ W O
       8.
 I
               I
  II
  2.S
                    fe
                    8
            5 B-fi
            <* £ B
            *> s. i
            W C? f
                    a
                    (0
                            §1
              <* S  E
             ].E E  S
              '§:w u e,
              •E S -S "
             9.b
             5™
             o
                                s §
              I Sll
              3 -O
              .n «
                   D.

                 S «


                 11.^
                  o..y B
                 ..S- § >
                  § la
            1


            1
             a »
             c .S
             '§•3
                           U > ra
                                1
               jj  c -a
               "3  S S
               >  S &.
                       s
                             8=-
                             o 2
                             I!
                                           I
                                            ra
                                            60
CO u

II
3 5
a u
£•8
                             "8
                              o
                             I
                             «
                             u

                             icS
                                        ^P!  521
                                                         o
                                                         " 2
                                         111
                                         lir
                                         «> a- a.
                                         o--£ k.
                                         c S"2
                                         C II
                                          4-1 QJ
                                          s s
                                         11
                                                        I.S
                                                        11
                                                        u >
                                                        a
                                                        c
                                                            §  -
                                                       •5
                                                       •| w

                                                       l!
                                                       el
                                                       |.lg

                                                       U > a
                          *l
                          |cs
                          •§--
                          O M
                          C CiJ
                          CO H
I

.f
S

£
52
'I -,-
a, u.
                                                                  §
                                                                  5s
                                         436

-------































If
ra
a
t/3

jl
>• „_
s.s
S B
$ n
J; C










*4-(
o
a
1
1















v^
|a
II
"3 .2?
W5

V
|
U
«£

01

£
"o
,?
u
Q.
C
j
.s



Selected Remedy
OJ
3
"3
a
V3
1



S
23


>
to
£
C
.0
1
Remedial
g
•R
S
8
o^
§

»
.^
01
6

?.


vD



C
8
5*
>
o
T3
C
ca
1
0
L4
3
CO
S
0\


§
o"
o
tv
M"
Is
S S
60 3
£?>S
O X
-c-i
w X
•e o
* =5
S 2
tamina
includi;
>i
1
o
U
60
e
ra
&3

o
8
o"
o
cr>
w
S
IS
.So
" in
S °
E E
— 3
11
3-S
C °
Su
- «2
^^
5 U
0 S

fixation, and replacement into excavated areas
followed by construction of a RCRA cap; GW




w
Jlw
03
&0
CJ
S*"

e
-a nj
c *.
« ^
a"13
3
11
•§••3
11
&
"o
s
Industrial

1
~a
a
c
c
rc










and soil monitoring; and access and land use













E
|
CJ


















restrictions and institutional controls on GW
use

















09/24/88
1st - Final

o
o
(^
Jf
CO
S

1
I
t/3
(A
1
60
U
1C
1
<
S
J=
o

g

CL











j?
C
i










by soil cover and revegetation; implementation
of erosion control measures; and deed











g

1
n
.c
'1


6





















8

v^
w










restrictions















S
^
Residentia,
Levee

               a  i
and
s
;
ard
issions
treets;
nated
estri
          ? 18
          
     £
     o
437

-------
to
\
\
^

c
1






























 §
.31
Signature
i Remedial
§
So
g
§o O
f—^ o _ ^
oC "*3 ^-" f
00 w M ^
I-H QU t^ S
S" 5 5 J.
1
1
1

«
•3
flj

'o
•S

£
e
OJ
g
S
•a
c
ra
a.
3 H
»« Q
5 o
o 2

1
I

o
z
:§1
> c
T3 M-

o o
o o

t*s vD cj
SCO .i-
— D.

GW treatment will meet SAWPA
limitations for discharge to
arsenic 2.0 mg/1, cadmium 0.064

OJ
c
u u
3 2

rt

^ t/5 "O
£"§^
S . ?
S ^ §
T3 n. S
C =i
eg O O
*^ U
i|J
^ j3 S£
5 w >
U =3 '-3

2
I

g
z
.£



co"

s
11
. to
1?
o *a
ts 2
E — '
'E 2
If
\ CO
bbiA
E 6























S

o
CO" ™
0 g
~ c
?
•a
'u
1"
a. 03
Ig
w S
g£
y s
S, 03
c>c »r
|^k
•§ e
~ CO
^s





























1
8
0
1
'-i
I























'? H if
u ^



M 3 ra « $>

2 c/T
o S .§
O 0 C
111
2
^
i* S
t/3 S O «
0.
.S| S
E|.S
o > S
T3
'0
<
o
IS
i.*
on a<
o

V3
IS


06/25/87





T3
n
CS












o
1
w
O
"o 'o
ja ^§a
•c 1 '» 1
a « c ^
!•§!,§
Ilil
"S c *a -~
jfl 2 c .S
6,-S * ^
^5- C yT ^
.S 2 I 2
E o S jg
•g-S>2-g
*Q 5J" oo re
1° "ll
cq ^ g > o
& O c =3 .i£
OS S o to -a

1
I
1/3
O
Z
•s

•« 'E §
U CO
ti *x> £
2 t-T CQ
c o U
|lf|
8d = :i
•^ o "5 B
<>.££.
^|
l|
.5 t- \
*3 ct) tx
g_3 CM
Ov



GO" o"

fefe


4_ i
C y— ^
S C
si
GW cleanup levels will attain an
overall excess cancer-risk level of
10"* by remediating TCE to 1.5
ug/1, thereby reducing the levels
of other contaminants below their
o
«'8
"c 'S
CQ
< "o
W5 *J
re c
a g
« g

o S
concentrations






























08/22/88

                                              438

-------
b
n

I
          G


          I
        a .§
          g
          I
                u.S
                 CO If
                    >,
                    "H,
                    a.
                   o re

                 Lf J
                   s re
                 :£ C
                Is?
                 ro a .2
                =3 O w
                 2 2 '5
                 £ S S
                M   to
                •a
                 c
                3
                 c
      l-v   re
      S°   .E
      ?s   T

      I   S
                 fl   S-i
                 : £  £ S1 !
                                    II
                 iial
               <*li1
                       "e "u
                 S.S O re .S
§1
g^
E •=
E S
r9 Z.
I
"re
'C
«^
[A
3
•a
c
                                        si«iS!Ui5"O — -5
                                        0&2 al.SS S?
                                                        P
                                        s ^ s s
                                        60 c .S 3

                                        Illi
                                        E re J«! c so
                                        ^ CX g £j .g
                                        •2 | " T3 P
                                        o °- w "S S
                                        2 S-
                         I
                                                         o
                                              a,,
                                              w p
                                              .
                                          •s S-SB
                           -S E
                         C 2 3
                           "' i
                                                OJ '
                                        Slj£
                                        O,, f e
                                                           ^^ c
                                                                to
                                                                .§ -E
                       .5 0)
                     r^ "O C
                   _ I 3 « re S
                   = E 73 5 go73
                     2 .S 2 o .S

                                                           <
      re —
      'Eg
      Si
      |.3

      a!
5
-------
t2 -o 2
o S I
5 ra G
sis:
1) O. jjj
g 3 o



Cleanup Goals







,, >,
"S -o
w
£3 E
C OJ
QJ pj
i"s
s 8
1 &
u "5
t/5




U
E
1
Si
V5
ra
5
2
IX
>
8
1

£g
||S|
Sf Sa
a 3 11
w U5 .§> |
c/: BS.
c
.9
6
V
tZ
§
O —
o* G ^^

5^i
Si
°fS£l5§*s
8 "2 i 3 ^ 1
s -d s i g o s
S S "^ S j tu 1?
•sfisS.fflSS
I^OilS
Il8lsl-a§
S^td-ii^
i^|l^"|-H
^Es|2«-i
lK.alillI
fflS
'ilsl
g si
E E « u
a OJ .tS oj
S £ " 1
£ H "*-H O
« O. O 
tj _, ^-
S?l
8 S c 6
c 1 „ -2
•3 M W e
re CO "S ft
- ? 2 P
'o S W 2
(55 8 E-6
£
•a , '3
C < ra
w > (fa
M 1 ^
11 1 I «


o


Hi e
S .S S .2
     'o
     a
     •
  6  £
T3
C
N
                           ^2  ^|
                              a  03
                           g-S  S JS
                           CO 3  _- 3
               B  I
                                   §10
                                 .- E
                     « •£ .
                       '
•Ml
E E <«
18 3 T3
                     as
                     O
    I
          440

-------













V
1
h-
of Decision Summarj
Record
1
|
§
rr















^
111
^ 2 5
a.





o.
3
C
S
a



Components of
Selected Remedy

01
3
"3
>
S
(A
5


01
1
a.
>
§


. c
till
.111!
w 5a .S? S
M pj
C
_o
'5
cti

$6,707,400

.0
s
£

1
-
M

C
n
_u
1
Q
!
dation of cathode waste m;
1

"P^
o
~L
vO

•c
•S
*o
T3
C
IS
O



§
w
•c
S


o


it

u-a
2 Sj
So _§

0 ^
8|
§K
(Q £
oo o.
^1
E ^/
in .g

1 .
landfill, followed by cappi:
placement of a soil cover
i!







^
|8
contamina
asbestos, \




g




s s^
§ 1 e § 3 E
^ C* « C M
21. c ra ,ft* E co
^ C CJ u* C QJ

=
2 'Sb
3 O B

IS ^ CN
_ii t- O
^ 13 2
^ u (S
. < 3
3 S "^
fe Q —
^i. C X
U D. 00
5 | e
o c ^
g'-'S fi 1
•a e •s .£ §
S IS. 9-ll
Ilp11ll
ItilPll
•§ =-s s"f | g
llilillil





8
§ T= 00^
C^ " =1 'S
- J£ 3 ?•
ClJ HH W W
U -5 .£ -a
60 60 8 «
.S .E E u-
~o -e S,'S
5 5 £? §
u u O s«
E C3 E S


&

— GO "fO
•c " .S
1 0 S




^"v
$30,000,001
(present
worth)

•a
> - §
O ^ 4_r

« ^ e
"5 o 'E
o vi
fii
Q^ C _M
*P t-
U W5 QJ
l-2^
U !S 5
!&
co
«>j2
fig
S 0! X-
eu.s o
closure and capping; GW
:nt during closure with offs
GW monitoring; provision
E E5
"§ 3K
J E 0
I-J 4_< 4-1
1
'0
&
O
•z.
•S
Sg^
•8^ §
Ifg
e 1 P
Il-s
O "" W
CJ WJ
O > H


S
1
Northside
Wa


0




TD
g
CO
£j*
U

!_
o t;
Ss
^ x""/
£^
CJ =
•a i/>
"c P

O w
C bO
•S ^
rS .S
sl
r- C
1§
•§•§
^ "
"S- wT
§•8
M 4J
s§
*s
S o S
Mi
111






g
bo
•6
"" nj
to QJ
li
E is
is
IS — .
'S<3
31
I-3
a! |
< 13 o
r c m
f> a \
TJ- 2 0
C
1
^
^
PCB concentration >10 mj
rification; filling entire site;
CS-g
1-
> CA


;-,
1

r T
^
00
^c
^
3
1
organics ii


<
5
uT
Transform
















oc
r^
monitoril
O
1
OJ
'53
i
•o
i
B
O
•o
1
ra












u
a.
C
!





i
s










Er
o S
QJ i)
S g
a c
5 •-
npling of onsite wooden sti
ine whether a second O.U.
S |
-a i!
B 01
w -a













ra
Salvage Y
09/15/89


































1




441

-------
>
c "2 a
Q C JO
ii " 5
ill


.52
"fO
3
a
y
c

u







^
Components of
Selected Remedy
I
} 
CO
1

Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
.0
'eb
S
§
0 2
§o
-— 0 —
§ a 83
31 si
« sii « -3






•s
(a
1
en

O
z


60
C
a
'C
to
J_<
*CO
60
^e
'w
3
C
OJ
j,
•a
c
CO
a.
E
3
O.
O

"8
 O
O >
s
" _
g^
II ?
-eg «
1^ 1


0

s
o 9§
o O
O *^~\ fj
gl 8 3
21 81
£ 1 c
fi E u
•3.E.2
1*1
. OJ
O.T3 60
3 D C
C J3 CO
S.!S •"
_ g ^
u "S "> -a
^ 3 -c 0
^ wj *a
S ^* e
^g2|
S^_g 1
H 7" -S 0
a o M- S
eyi c o u.
be
« a; -E
"" •- •£
r- fc .5 «
§ o = -S
tinue operation of IRM; constructi
treatment system; excavation and
ssal of contaminated soil with soil
maintenance of institutional conti
c > cu-a
8> S2 c
O T3 CO

•a
&
1
VI
0
Z
UJ
w y
O PH
O "O
<=> g
8^«
=5 *S
M "S 60
•a S c
C ra ~
CO C ^
£ 'e -3
O S .S
IRM
South Tacoma
Channel Well 12A,
WA
05/03/85


o
•^




o
w






"8
c
I
*-J
o
Z



BO
rurther action with GW monitorin;
o

"8
c
1
VI
O
Z






S
o
Z
2nd
Toftdahl Drums,
WA


o
*"•
       §
           „
       O^   trt
       O   ^^
             'S 6
         o
     *-i 2 -a
     c   aj
     W CO tj
               "8
                S
              f- v2
     &Sll
     IS^l
      S « o-
                            o
                              •§ w- ~ '.5 | _
                            •6 ^ -S i I I
                            " -     *
                .
              5 e-  S
              5 2 .S .E
                            E
                            o
                            83 <
                   §
443

-------
I"S
^ ™
a-1
Is3














Components of



















•jj
"3? ™
X
£* &
8? E
ro ^
& .£





a
s
°





ws
1
o
o

Cu
3
g-

u


Selected Remedy
u
E
1
a
VI
a



e
tu
J2
s
IX
^
ro
a
S



B
•a
•<
_
•3
dj
E
OS
c
o
'5i
CC
i s!
§"0 °_ —
-H.§ 0 |
Si 51

o
^ QJ -
K - i
.•s|||l
_- O ^ O O
2 -0 ^ .0 ^


e 60^ ^ u
|^ w-d |ja

's M "8 5 ^ 0°
3 > >< x ^ y
< o o u > •<
Soil sampling and analysis of onsite and offsite
areas; excavation and offsite disposal of
selected soil and non-soil materials; excavation
or cleaning and plugging all utility and process
lines in Area I; GW extraction and treatment;
stormwater control; excavation and onsite
disposal of selected soil; excavation of utility
lines; cleaning utility manholes and vaults;
capping; performing bench scale testing of soil
solidification technique; and excavation of Mill
Creek sediment; and performing supplemental
remedial planning studies if GW contamination
migrates

1
1

o


_ -a
"e •S S «
"S "ra
™ 4-1 ? (rt yi *-J
=§" | "§ 'E S e
^ "3 e ^ bo "c

§5 w E . -~ .
-^ 3 3 5 x
O t! 8 > .E PL,
00
c
'«
I
s
^ in

oj m
S3 < \ -a
55 0  s i.
"-1 B 5i
•S 8-i
13 « -|

>< x:
« 5u
i ^ ob
>•— "Jv
S fe =
•~ c ^
Q ra **-<
(^ u O
Soil sampling in all on- and off-property areas
and waste sampling in Area I; excavation and
offsite disposal of highly contaminated soil and

1
I

O
z

,vT
QJ *S
"O "C
* ?
g 5 "S
• — e

M ra E
a">" c
So 8
00
c
§
b
lM
&H
E
tj
S <
5 5


0

^^
£
8

c
o

ll
Jl

"S 0

— w
§"B
Ji
13 M
8!
other wastes found in Area I and capping the
excavated area; excavation and onsite or offsite






•o
M ™
^ y
c£
bp ^
=5 u
•73

•— rj
d 9
>3





v£>
*
^T
^
S












3
^
*

i
0
D,
<
Q
C/3
disposal of soil found in off-property areas and
covering the remaining surface soil; onsite or
offsite disposal of all buried containerized







Is"
£? ^* "o
o - c
*2 c?
•s 1 *
^ too C

g :— j:
3 — ^
2 .1 g

^.
c
i
c
V
e
*— '
ta

-------
                                SECTION V

                          RECORDS OF DECISION

                      KEYWORD LIST: FY 1982-1990
The ROD Keyword List presents the RODs approved from FY  1982-1990  by major
keyword categories and subcategories.  The list is a compilation of those keywords
identified for each site in the ROD abstracts found  at the beginning of this document.
The first two  pages of this  list provide  an  index of all  keyword categories and
subcategories.  The following text lists those RODs associated with  each keyword.

-------
                 RECORD OF DECISION KEYWORD LIST  INDEX
Listed below are major keyword categories and their subcategories for Superfund Records of
Decision (RODs).
Primary Hazardous
Substances Detected

Acids
Arsenic
Asbestos
Benzene
Carcinogenic Compounds
Chromium
Dioxin
Inorganics (other than metals)
Lead
Metals
Mining Wastes
Oils
Organics
PAHs
PCBs
PCE
Pesticides
Phenols
Radioactive  Materials
Solvents
TCE
Toluene
VOCs
Xylenes

Contaminated Media

Air
Debris
Ground Water
Sediment
Sludge
Soil
Surface Water

Public Health and
Environmental Threats

Direct Contact
Public Exposure

Remedy Selection

ARAR Waiver
Institutional Controls
Interim Remedy
No Action Remedy
O&M
ROD Amendment

Water Supply

Alternate Water Supply
Drinking Water Contaminants

Site-Specific Characteristics

Hoodplain
Sole-Source Aquifer
Wetlands

Standards/Regulations/Permits/
Guidance

Hybrid/Alternate Closure (not under RCRA)
ARARs (not listed as a keyword after FY
1988)
       Clean Air Act
       Clean Water Act
             Water Quality Criteria
       RCRA
             Closure Requirements
             Clean Closure
             Landfill Closure
       Safe Drinking Water Act
             MCLs
             MCLGs
       State Standards/Regulations
       Toxic Substances  Control Act
Public Health Advisory
State Guidance
State Permit

Testing/Pilot Studies

Leachability Tests
Treatability Studies

Technology

Aeration
Air Monitoring
Air Stripping
                                         447

-------
                  RECORD OF DECISION KEYWORD  LIST  INDEX
                                      (Continued)
Biodegradation/Land Application
Capping
Carbon Adsorption (GAC)
Decontamination
Dredging
Excavation
Filling
Ground Water Monitoring
Ground Water Treatment
Incineration/Thermal Destruction
Leachate Collection/Treatment
Levees
Offsite Discharge
Offsite Disposal
Offsite Treatment
Onsite Containment
Onsite Discharge
Onsite Disposal (includes residuals)
Onsite Treatment
Plume Management
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
Relocation
Slurry Wall
Soil Washing/Flushing
Solidification/Stabilization
Solvent Extraction
Surface Water Collection/Diversion
Surface Water Monitoring
Surface Water Treatment
Temporary Storage
Treatment Technology
Vacuum Extraction
Venting
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Vitrification

Miscellaneous

Municipally Owned Site

Historically Significant

ACL
Background Levels
Deferred Decision
Initial Remedial Measure (IRM)
Contingent Remedy
                                         448

-------
                  SUPERFUND RECORDS OF DECISION:  KEYWORD LIST

Listed below are major keyword categories and their subcategories for Superfund Records of
Decision (RODs).   Following each of these categories is a broad sampling of RODs containing the
listed keyword.  Some categories may become obsolete or new categories may develop over time
due  to changes in the focus of the Superfund remedy selection process; these categories have been
noted, as appropriate.  The Superfund managers in each Region  have copies of all RODs.


                KEYWORDS (BY CATEGORY) AND ASSOCIATED ROD SITES
                                 (BY SITE, STATE (REGION))

PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Acids

Charles George, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical,
MA  (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Western Sand  & Gravel, RI (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Chemical
Control, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; PAS Oswego, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal,
PA (III); Fike Chemical,  WV (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lackawanna  Refuse Site,
PA (III); Southern  Maryland Wood, MD (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL
(FV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Hunts Disposal, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI  (V); Northside
Sanitary Landfill/  Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Highlands Acid
Pit, TX  (VI); Tar Creek, OK  (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical,  MO (VII);
Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mines, CA
(IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Gould, OR (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD WA (X);
Western Processing, WA  (X)

Arsenic

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*;
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Groveland  Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA
(I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; W.R.
Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical
Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical,  NY (II); Claremont Polychemical
(09/28/90), NY (II)*; D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II);
Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue
Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari  Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill,  NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY  (II); Love Canal/93rd Street
School, NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); North Sea  Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney  Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill,  NJ (II); Sealand  Restoration, NY
(II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II);
Syosset  Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA  (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III);
Dorney  Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA  (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Hederson Road, PA (III); Lord Shope
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             449

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Arsenic (continued)

Landfill, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III);
Ordnance  Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA
(III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88), DE
(III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape
Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Davie
Landfill, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC  (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL
(IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal (03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump, KY  (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Sapp Battery,
FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV);
Algoma Municipal Landfill,  WI (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron &  Metal, OH (V);
Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage  Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*;
Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH  (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest
Waste Disposal,  MI (V)*; Fort Wayne  Reduction, IN (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill,  WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Master Disposal Service
Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO II, IN (V); Morris Arsenic, MN (V); New
Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical (09/29/90), MI
(V)*; Pristine (Amendment),  OH (V); South Andover, MN (V); Springfield Township Dump,  MI (V);
Summit National, OH  (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V);  Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX  (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood,  AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand,  KS
(VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater  Contamination (East
Industrial  Park), NE  (VII); Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Weldon
Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service,  MO  (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA  (VII);  Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek,  MT (VIII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND  (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*; East Helena,
MT (VIII);  Milltown, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln
Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand  Creek Industrial, CO (VIII);
Sharon Steel (Midvale  Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical,  CO (VIII)*; Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA  (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz
Barrel & Drum,  CA (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); McColl, CA  (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA
(IX); Commencement Bay/NearShore  (09/30/89), WA (X); Martin Marietta,  OR (X); Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)

Asbestos

Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;  Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler
Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV  (III)*;
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (HI); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Cape Fear Wood
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              450

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS  SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Asbestos (continued)

Preserving, NC (IV); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V);
Broderick Wood Products,  CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA (IX)*; Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*;
Martin Marietta, OR (X)

Benzene

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I);
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis  Liquid Waste, RI (I);  Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT  (I)*;  Landfill & Resource Recovery,
RI (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill,  VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT
(I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal  Pit, MA (I); Sullivan's  Ledge, MA (I); W.R.  Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel  & Drum, NY (II)*;  Chemical Leaman
Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination,  NJ  (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;  Ewan Property,  NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ  (II)*; FAA
Technical  Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ
(II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II);  Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals,  NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ
(II); King  of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill,  NJ  (II)*;
Ludlow Sand  & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY
(II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville
Landfill, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;
Volney  Landfill, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72,  NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ
(II); York  Oil, NY (II); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware  Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE  (III); Drake  Chemical,  PA (III)*; East Mt.  Zion,
PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III);
Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*;Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane and Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A.  Clarke  & Son, VA (III); Lord  Shope Landfill, PA (III);
M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Walsh Landfill,  PA (III); Westline, PA (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III);
Airco, KY (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC  (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics,  NC (IV);  Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City  Industries, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);
Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old  Reichhold, MS  (IV);
Perdido Groundwater, AL  (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);  Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Bofors
Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump,  MI (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort Wayne  Reduction, IN
(V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts  Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V);  Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/30/88), MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90),  MN
(V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V);  Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI
(V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP),  MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              451

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Benzene (continued)

Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN
(V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI  (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Seymour, IN  (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Summit National, OH  (V);
U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel,  IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil,
IN (V); Wheeler  Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX  (VI);
Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pits, TX (VI)*; Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(VI); North Cavalcade Street,  TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John,  Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield  Coal  Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO
(VII);Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump,
IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20,  WY (VIII); Ogden
Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky  Mountain Arsenal
(OU18), CO (VIII)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant),  CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM
Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*;
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA  (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment) (09/28/90),
CA (IX)*; Purity  Oil Sales, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Commencement  Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X)

Carcinogenic Compounds

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I); Charles George, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid
Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
Keefe Environmental Services, NH  (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood  PCBs,
MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield  Landfill (09/29/90), VT
(I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve,  MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,  MA (I); Saco Tannery
Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),
NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R.  Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY  (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (ID*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell  Trucking,
NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier
Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ  (II); Ewan Property, NJ  (II)*;  FAA
Technical Center, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Glen Ridge
Radium, NJ (II);  Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco
Polymer, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ  (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone  Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel,  NY (II);
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);  Marathon  Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals,
NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ  (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West
Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange  Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery
Township, NJ  (II);  Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage,
NY (II); Port Washington Landfill,  NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY  (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             452

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Carcinogenic Compounds (continued)

Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II);
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township
Route 532, NJ (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA
(III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); C&R  Battery, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III);
Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem
(09/28/90), PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE  (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA
(III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Fike
Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown
PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA  (III);  Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill,
PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA  (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III);
M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (HI)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand
Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA  (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson Dump #1,
PA (III)*; Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PA (III); 62nd Street  Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV);
Airco,KY (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV);
Amnicola  Dump,  TN (IV); Brown  Wood Preserving, FL  (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater
Contamination, NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers,  FL  (IV);  Cape  Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn,
SC (PvO; Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
(IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment),
FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL  (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm  Bay  Facility, FL (IV); Hollingsworth,  FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill,  KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal
(03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill,  FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN  (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm,
KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek),  AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL  (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke,  OH (V)*; Alsco
Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill,
IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH  (V); Byron Salvage
Yard, IL (V)*; Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling  Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*;  Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Ionia
City Landfill MI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN  (V)*;  Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);  Long
Prairie,  MN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V);
Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*;  Miami County Incinerator,  OH  (V); MIDCO  I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/ Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical
(09/20/90), MI (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment),  IL  (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park) (09/28/90), MN
(V)*; Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision  Document
                                             453

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Carcinogenic Compounds (continued)

Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V);  U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*;
Wausau Water Supply, WI  (V); Wausau Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN
(V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bailey Waste
Disposal, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,
AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI);  Pesses
Chemical, TX  (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,  TX (VI)*;
South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK
(VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.  3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield  Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine  Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works,  MO (VII); Northwestern States
Portland Cement, IA (VII);   Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach,
MO  (VII)*; Vogel Paint  &  Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon
Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO  (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE),  UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20,
WY  (VIII); Ogden Defense  Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln  Dust  #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky
Rats Plant (DOE), CO  (VIII); Rocky Mountain  Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO  (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU19), CO
(VIII)*; Rocky  Mountain  Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*;
Sand Creek Industrial, CO  (VIII); Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT
(VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas Asbestos  Mine, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine,  CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos
Mine (09/21/90), CA (IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA  (IX); IBM  (San Jose), CA  (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX);  Intel (Santa Clara III), CA  (IX); Intersil, CA (IX);  J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ  (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ
(IX)*; MGM Brakes, CA  (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX); Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*;  Raytheon, CA  (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX)*; San Gabriel Area  1, CA (IX);
Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area,
CA (IX)*; Stringfellow  Acid Pits, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Tucson
International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement  Bay/Near shore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X)*;  Fort Lewis Logistic  Center,  WA (X); Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);  Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X);  Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang  Albany (TWCA),
OR (X)
 *       Subsequent Record of Decision
 S       Supplemental Record of Decision
 EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              454

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Chromium

Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical,
NH (I); Nyanza  Chemical, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Byron Barrel  & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical,
NJ (II); DTmperio Property,  NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*;
FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II);  Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ
(II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King  of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang
Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II);
Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments,  NY (II); Solvent Savers,
NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II);  Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY  (II)*; Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE  (III); Dorney
Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical,  PA (III)*;  Havertown PCP,
PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA
(III); Matthews Electroplating,  VA (III); PA (III); Limestone  Road, MD  (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA
Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);1 McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE  (III); Osborne
Landfill, PA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; 62nd
Street Dump, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination,  NC (IV);
Cabot/Koppers,  FL  (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC(IV);
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M
Oil), SC (FV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe
Valley  Landfill, KY  (FV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes,  NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump,
KY (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville  Road
Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV);
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL  (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V);  Auto Ion  Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground,
OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH  (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Hunts  Disposal,  WI (V); Ionia  City Landfill,  MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service  Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*;
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;  Novaco Industries,  MI (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI  (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH  (V); Schmaltz  Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz
Dump  (09/30/87), WI (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Springfield Township  Dump,  MI (V); Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating,  IN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel,  IL (V); Wayne  Waste Oil, IN
(V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*;  Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*;  Odessa  Chromium I,  TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I
(03/18/8), TX (VI)*; Odessa  Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday),  KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination
(FAR-MAR-CO),  NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA  (VII); Northwestern States
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDO   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             455

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Chromium (continued)

Portland Cement, IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII); Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII);
Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Del Norte, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant),  CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ*; Louisiana-Pacific,
CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); FMC Yakima Pit, WA
(X); Frontier Hard Chrome  (12/30/87), WA (X); Frontier  Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*;  Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X); United Chrome, OR
(X); Western Processing, WA (X)*

Dioxin

Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II);
Love Canal, NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Havertown
PCP, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; American Creosote Works, FL (IV);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill,  AR (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);  United Creosoting, TX (VI)*;
Vertac, AR (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Ellisville MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO
(VII)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO
(VII); Times Beach,  MO (VII); Times Beach (09/28/88), MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO
(VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX)

Inorganics

Auburn Road, NH  (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA
(I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Sylvester, NH  (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control,  NJ
(II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II);
Friedman Property, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY  (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY  (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill,  NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Roebling Steel, NJ (II);
Scientific Chemical  Processing, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA  (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III);
Chisman Creek (03/31/88), VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA
(III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fisher Calo Chem,  IN (V); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III);  Limestone Road,
MD (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III);  Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire
Fire, VA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wade, PA (III);  Airco, KY (IV); A.
L. Taylor, KY (IV);  Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Distler Brickyard,
KY (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);  Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV);
Hipps  Road Landfill, FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              456

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Inorganics (continued)

Landfill, FL (IV); Newport Dump, KY (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*;
Acme Solvents, IL (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bower's Landfill,
OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste (06/30/86), MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal (03/31/88), MI
(V)*; Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Lake Sandy Jo,  IN (V); Liquid
Disposal, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Republic Steel  Quarry, OH  (V); Rose Township,
MI (V); South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); Wauconda Sand  & Gravel,  IL (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cimarron
Mining, NM (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);  Mid-South Wood,
AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco, TX  (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Tar  Creek, OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee
County/Galena, KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac  River Landfill, MO (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm,  IA (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA  (VII); Syntex
Verona, MO (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT  (VIII); California Gulch, CO  (VIII); Central
City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground  Water, MT (VIII)*;
Coalinga  Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Iron Mountain
Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);  Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); South
Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division),
CA (IX); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X);  Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X)

Lead

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells,  MA (I); Iron Horse
Park,  MA (I); New Bedford,  MA (I); Pinette's Salvage  Yard,  ME (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
(I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat,
NY (II)*; Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel  & Drum, NY  (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
(II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont
Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan
Property  (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY  (II)*;  Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*;  Lone Pine Landfill,  NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals,  NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ  (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
(II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Roebling  Steel, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vestal  Water Supply 1-1,
NY (II)*; Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland  Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil,
NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); C&R
Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum,  PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE  (III);  Dorney Road
Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville  Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Dover Air  Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III);
Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation  Landfill, PA  (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             457

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Lead (continued)

M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; New Castle Steel  DE (III); Ordnance
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III);
Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Walsh
Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat
Landfill (11/28/88), DE  (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination,
NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (FV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV);  Rowood, MS  (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes, NC  (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville  Landfill, GA (IV);
Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Auto Ion Chemicals,  MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard,
IL (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction,  IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V);
Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI  (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
(V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*;  Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V);  NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic  Steel Quarry, OH (V);  Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), IL (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V);  University of Minnesota, MN (V); Wauconda Sand &
Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN  (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),  NM  (VI); Gurley Pit, AR
(VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR  (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*;
Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);  South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier  Creek/Bldg.  3001),
OK Wayne Waste Oil, IN  (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial  Waste Control, AR  (VI);  Motco,  TX (VI)*; Pesses
Chemical, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK
(VI); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);  Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Doepke Disposal  (Holliday),
KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East
Industrial Park), NE (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing,  NE  (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North  Farm,
IA (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Todtz,  Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel
Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*;  Wheeling Disposal
Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT
(VIII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII);  Central City/Clear  Creek,
CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver  Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill
Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale
Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant),  CA (IX); Litchfield
Airport, AZ (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX);  Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);  Stringfellow  Acid Pits, CA
(IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89),  WA (X);
Gould, OR (X); Teledyne Wah Chang  Albany (TWCA), OR (X)

Metals

Auburn Road  Landfill, NH (I);  Auburn Road Landfill  (09/29/89), NH  (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA
(I); Baird & McGuire (09/27/90), MA  (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I);  Charles George Landfill 3 &
4, MA (I)*; Charles George, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH  (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI  (I);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             458

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Metals (continued)

Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond,  MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge
Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe  Environmental Services, NH (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA
(I); Norwood  PCBs, MA (I);  Nyanza Chemical, MA (I);  O'Connor, ME (I); Ottari & Goss/Great
Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*;
South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's  Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester,
NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R.  Grace (Acton Plant),  MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ
(II)*; Byron Barrel &  Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II);
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical
Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*;  Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination,  NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY  (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property,  NJ (II); Ewan Property
(09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Forest Glen
Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton  Terminals, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR  (II);
Haviland Complex, NY (II);  Higgins Farm, NJ  (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY  (II)*;  Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
King of  Prussia, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill (09/28/90),  NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*;  Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY
(II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems,
NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West  Orange Radium, NJ (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); North Sea  Municipal Landfill, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II);  Picatinny Arsenal,
NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ
(II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY  (II);  Roebling Steel, NJ  (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville
Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II);  Sealand Restoration,  NY (II);  Sharkey
Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syncon
Resins, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical,  NJ
(II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route  72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil,  NY (II); Aladdin  Plating, PA (III); Army Creek
Landfill, DE (III); Army Creek Landfill (06/29/90), DE  (III)*; Avtex  Fibers, VA  (III); Blosenski
Landfill, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA  (III)*; C&R Battery, VA
(III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE
(III); Craig Farm Drum,  PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA
(III); Douglassville  Disposal,  PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment),  PA (III); Dover Air
Force Base, DE  (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III);
Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Havertown PCP,
PA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III);  Henderson Road, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III);
Kane &  Lombard, MD (III);  Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lord  Shope Landfill, PA (III);
McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer  Landfill, PA (III); M.W.  Manufacturing, PA  (III);
M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill,  PA (III); Palmerton
Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Sand Gravel & Stone (09/28/90), MD
(III)*; US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill,  PA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wade, PA (III);
West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA  (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE
(III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88), DE (III)*; 62nd Street  Dump, FL (IV);  A. L. Taylor, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                               459

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Metals (continued)

Contamination, NC  (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn,
SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;  Chemtronics, NC
(IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC  (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving
(Amendment), FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL  (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY
(IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump,  TN (IV); Miami  Drum Services, FL
(IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National  Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS
(IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN  (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL
(IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL  (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powersville  Landfill, GA  (IV); Sapp
Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff  Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal,  FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood,  FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater  Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV);
A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*; Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco  Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI
(V); Byron/Johnson  Salvage Yard, IL  (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Coshocton Landfill,  OH (V);
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*;  Forest Waste Disposal (03/31/88),
MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction,  IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V);  Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts
Disposal, WI  (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI  (V); Kysor  Industrial, MI (V); Lake
Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil,  OH (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*;  Miami County Incinerator,  OH  (V); MIDCO I,
IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State  Disposal, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V);
New Brighton (TCAAP), MN  (V)*;  New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth  Avenue Dump  (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental  Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove
Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab  Orchard
NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); South
Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota,
MN  (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel (03/31/89), IL (V)*; Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);  Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),  NM
(VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);  Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA  (VI); Crystal
Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited,  TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);  Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands  Acid  Pit (06/26/87), TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);
Johns-Manville, IL (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);  Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Old  Inger, LA (VI);  Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sand Springs,  OK
(VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX  (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83,
NM  (VI)*; Tar Creek,  OK (VI); Tinker AFB  (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI);  United Nuclear,
NM  (VI); Big River  Sand, KS  (VII); Cherokee County/Galena,  KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);  Fairfield Coal Gasification
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             460

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS  SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Metals (continued)

Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Kem-Pest
Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence  Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint
& Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits
(USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII);
Anaconda Smelter/Mill Metals Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products,  CO (VIII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground  Water, MT
(VIII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta,  Denver Aerospace, CO  (VIII); Milltown, MT
(VIII); Milltown-S, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity
Properties, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO  (VIII)*;
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII);  Sharon Steel
(Midvaie Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT  (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union
Pacific, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville,
CA (IX);  Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works  (09/30/85), CA (IX)*; Coalinga
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA  (IX); Litchfield  Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel  & Drum, CA
(IX); Louisiana-Pacific,  CA  (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ  (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX);  Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Selma  Pressure Treating, CA (IX);  Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow
Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA  (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier
Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA  (X); Queen  City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA  (X);  Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA),
OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing (09/25/85), WA
(X)*

Mining Wastes

Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Tar Creek, OK  (VI); United Nuclear,  NM (VI);
Cherokee County, KS  (VII)*; California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO  (VIII)*;
Milltown, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
(VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO  (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII);
Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X)

Oils

Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); McKin, ME (I)*; American Thermostat, NY
(II)*; Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ  (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Pijak
Farm, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II);  Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Avtex Fibers,
VA (III)*; Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon (09/29/86), PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal,
PA(III)*; Dover Air Force Base,  DE (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking,  PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote  Works, TN (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products,
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             461

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS  SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Oils (continued)

FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV);
Mowbray Engineering, AL  (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest
Waste, MI (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (06/30/89), OH (V)*; New Lyme,
OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Old Mill, OH (V);
Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Geneva Industries,  TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Arkansas City
Dump, KS (VII)*; Ellisville, MO (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water,
MT (VIII)*; Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Western  Processing,  WA (X)

Organics/VOCs

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill (09/29/89), NH  (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA
(I); Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill (09/28/90), CT (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA
(I); Charles George, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH  (I);
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA
(I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
Keefe Environmental Services (03/21/88), NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I);
Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery,  RI (I); Laurel Park,
CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90),, VT (I)*; Ottati and
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo  Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard,  ME (I);  Re-Solve, MA (I);
Re-Solve (09/24/87), MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I);
Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I);
Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA  (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II);
Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89),  NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field,  NY (II); Brewster Well Field (09/29/88),
NY (II)*; Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Hy Bog (09/29/88),  NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel
& Drum,  NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; Chemical
Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,
NY (II); Combe Fill North  Landfill, NJ (II); Combe  Fill South Landfill, NJ (II);  DeRewal Chemical,
NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II);
Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89),  NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);  FAA
Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II);
Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II);  GE Moreau, NY  (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II);
Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Higgins Farm, NJ  (II);
Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II);
Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky  Avenue
Wellfield  (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ
(II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ  (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ
(II); Lone Pine Landfill (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School,
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              462

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Organics/VOCs  (continued)

NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery
(09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II);  Old Bethpage, NY (II); Clean Well
Field, NY (II); PAS Oswego,  NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred  Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ  (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);  Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ  (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand
Restoration, NY  (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY  (II);
Solvent Savers, NY (II); Suffern Village  Well Field, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins,  NJ
(II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II);  Vega
Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;  Volney Landfill, NY (II);  Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams  Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland
Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil,  NY  (II); Army Creek  Landfill, DE (III);  Avtex Fibers, VA
(III)*;  Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand  Pit, PA (III);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Butz  Landfill, PA (III); Coker's Sanitation
Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon  TCE  Spill, PA  (III); Croydon TCE
Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,  PA (III); Cryo-Chem  (09/28/90), PA (III)*; Delaware Sand
and Gravel, DE  (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal  (Amendment), PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (06/30/89), PA (III)*; Dover Air Force  Base,
DE (III);  Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (05/13/86), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical  (09/29/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood  Chemical, VA  (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road
(09/29/89), PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation
Landfill,  PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA  (III);  Leetown
Pesticide, WV (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III);
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA
(III); M.W.  Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; New Castle Spill, DE (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal  Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne  Landfill, PA (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking,
PA (III);  Raymark, PA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III);  Sand Gravel & Stone (09/28/90),  MD
(III)*;  Southern Maryland  Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III);
Tybouts Corner,  DE (III);  Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (09/30/88), PA (III)*; Tyson's
Dump (Amendment), PA  (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Wade, PA  (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III);
Westline, PA (III)*; Westline  (06/29/88), PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West
Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill,
DE (III);  62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Alpha  Chemical, FL  (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC
(IV); Airco, KY (IV); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV);  American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works  (09/29/89), FL (IV)*; Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving,  FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL  (IV); Cape
Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn,  SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC  (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV);  Ciba-Geigy, AL  (IV);  Coleman Evans, FL
(IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler  Farm, KY (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL  (IV); Gallaway
Ponds, TN (IV);  Geiger  (C&M Oil), SC  (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);  Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL
(PvO; Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV);  Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome  Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              463

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Organics/VOCs (continued)

Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (FV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powerville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff
Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical  (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water Road,  FL  (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*;
Acme Solvents, IL (V); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Anderson  Development, MI (V); Arrowhead  Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V);
Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI
(V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*;
Cemetery Dump, MI (V);  Charlevoix, MI  (V); Charlevoix (09/30/85), MI (V)*; Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH
(V); Clare  Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow  Dump, MI  (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V);
Eau Claire-IRM,  WI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*;  Forest Waste Disposal, MI  (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI  (V);
Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH  (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V);
Kummer Landfill, MN (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/30/88), MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary
Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; LaSalle  Electrical  Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*;
Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V);  Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg
Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill,  MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill,  WI (V);
Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator,  OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance  Plant,  MN (V);  New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Interim
Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton/St. Anthony-IRM, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAPP), MN
(V)*; New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN  (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill,
WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (03/31/90), MI (V)*;
Outboard  Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar
& Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH
(V); Rose Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI),  IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V);  Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
Township  Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Summit National,  OH  (V); U.S. Aviex,  MI (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona
Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering,  MN (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V);  Wausau Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*;
Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises,  IN (V);  Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump,  MN
(V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX  (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Dixie
Oil, TX  (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);
Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Highlands Acid Pit (06/27/87), TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);  Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/30/88), TX (VI)*; North
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                            464

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Organics/VOCs (continued)

Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI);
Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI);  South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM
(VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*;
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI);  Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United  Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR
(VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big River
Sand, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque
Works, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);  Ellisville, MO
(VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII);
Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE  (VII); Hastings
Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Northwestern States
Portland Cement, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid  State Circuits, MO (VII); Syntex
Verona, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint  & Wax, IA  (VII); Waverly
Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*;
Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII);
Libby Ground Water (12/30/88), MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII);
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3),  UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky
Mountain  Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain  Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain  Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA
(IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Del  Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel  (Mountain View),  CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA  (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel  & Drum, CA
(IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX);  Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
(IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment) (09/28/90), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil
Sales, CA  (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1),
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San  Gabriel Area  1, CA (IX); San
Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma  Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA
(IX); Stringfellow Acid  Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits (07/17/84), CA (IX); Stringfellow
Acid Pits (06/25/87), CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA  (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX);
Tucson International  Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner-IRM, WA (X); Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*;
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing
(09/04/86), WA (X)*
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             465

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

PAHs (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons)

Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I);
Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Iron Horse Park, MA (I);
Norwood  PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill
(09/22/88), VT (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H,
MA  (I); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater
Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Renora  Inc., NJ (II); Scientific
Chemical  Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vestal Water  Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Woodland
Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Delaware Sand and  Gravel, DE
(III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(06/24/88), PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA  (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane &
Lombard, MD (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Ordnance  Works Disposal, WV  (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III);  Taylor Borough, PA (III); Walsh
Landfill, PA (III); Westline Site, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); A. L.  Taylor, KY (IV); American Creosote
Works,  FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV)*;
Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL  (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV);  Cape Fear
Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;  Geiger (C&M  Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich,
B.F., KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold,  MS  (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm,
KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Arrowhead Refinery, MN  (V);  Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V);  Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN  (V); Forest Waste  Disposal, MI  (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; K&L Landfill, MI (V); Lake Sandy
Jo, IN (V);Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I,  IN (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth  Avenue  Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*;
Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental  Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Onalaska  Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Reilly Tar, MN  (V); Reilly Tar &  Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly
Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN  (V);
Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI);
Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca,  LA (VI)*; French  Limited, TX (VI); Geneva
Industries, TX (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);  Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North
Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United
Creosoting (09/29/89), TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII);  Doepke
Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Weldon  Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE),  MO
(VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT  (VIII); J.H.  Baxter,  CA (IX);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);  Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Martin Marietta,  OR (X); Western  Processing (09/25/85), WA
(X)*
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              466

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls)

Cannon Engineering, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;  Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes,
NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,
MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA  (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH
(I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Clothier Disposal,NY (II); FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Goose Farm,  NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II);
Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ  (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ  (II); Ludlow Sand
& Gravel, NY (II); Myers Property, NJ  (II); Pijak Farm,  NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ  (II); Roebling Steel,
NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY
(II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY
(II)*; Wide Beach, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel,
DE (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III);  Douglassville  Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Fike Chemical,  WV (III); Harvey-Knott, DE  (III);  Kane &  Lombard, MD (III);
Lehigh Electric, PA (III); Millcreek, PA  (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing
(06/29/90), PA (III)*; Ordnance Works  Disposal, WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd  Street Dump, FL  (IV);
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL  (IV); Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL  (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI  Dixiana,  SC (IV); Smith's
Farm, KY (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V); A&F Materials-IRM, IL
(V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Belvidere  Landfill, IL (V); Berlin &  Farro, MI
(V); Biphenyls Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD,  OH (V);  Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem,  IN (V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*;
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL
(V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL  (V)*;  Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (06/30/89),
OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI  (V); Miami County  Incinerator, OH (V);  MIDCO  I, IN (V); MIDCO II,
IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V);  Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/ Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Old Mill, OH (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical,  MI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V);  Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard  NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V);
Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Wayne  Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V);
Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI);  French Limited,  TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit,  AR,
(VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,  TX (VI);
Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI);  Doepke Disposal (Holliday),
KS (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits
(USDOE), MO (VII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;  Martin Marietta,  Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel  & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Purity
Oil Sales, CA (IX); Taputimu  Farm,  AS (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X);
Northwest  Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen  City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA
(X); Western Processing, WA  (X)*
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             467

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

PCE (Tetrachloroethylene/Perchloroethylene)

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
Kellogg-Deering Well  Field, CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT(I); Old
Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Picillo Farm, RI (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South
Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Tinkhams Garage  (Amendment), NH (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*;
Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well Field (09/29/88), NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont
Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property  (09/29/89),  NJ (II)*; Higgins
Farm, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ
(II)*; Marathon  Battery (09/30/88),  NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY  (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems,
NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ  (II)*; Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred
Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ  (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II);
Rocky Hill, NJ  (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers,
NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III);  Butz Landfill, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Cryo-Chem, PA (III);
Cryo-Chem (09/29/90), PA (III)*; Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Henderson Road,  PA  (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lord
Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA  (III); M.W.
Manufacturing  (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III);
Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics,  NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC  (IV); City Industries,
FL (IV); Howe  Valley Landfill, KY  (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI
Dixiana, SC (IV); Big  D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V);  Byron Salvage Yard, IL
(V)*; Byron Salvage Yard (06/30/89), IL (V)*;  Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Cross  Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*;
FMC Corporation,  MN (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;
Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Kummer Sanitary  Landfill, MN (V)*;
Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street  Wellfield, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora
Landfill, MI (V)*;  Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal,  WI (V); National Presto
Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New  Brighton/Arden
Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),  MN (V); Northernaire Plating,
MI (V)*; Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*;
Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); South Andover, MN  (V); U.S. Aviex, MI  (V);
Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona Well  Field, MI (V)*; Waite  Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau
Water Supply, WI  (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Geneva Industries, TX
(VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK  (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,
TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South
Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK  (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE  (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest  Manufacturing/North Farm,  IA  (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO  (VII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense
Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln  Dust #2 &  #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             468

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS  SUBSTANCES DETECTED

PCE (Tetrachloroethylene/Perchloroethylene) (continued)

(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX);
Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San  Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel
Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA  (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); Watkins
Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Fort  Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X);
South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*

Pesticides

Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird &  McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth MA (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ottati &  Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali,
NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal
(10/26/87), NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street  School (09/26/88), NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II);
Pijak Farm,  NJ (II); Renora, Inc., NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II);  Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Douglassville Disposal, PA  (III); Drake Chemical,  PA (III);
Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga  Wrecking, PA (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway
Six, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI
Dixiana, SC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek),  AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL
(IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL  (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V);  E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);  Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);  Liquid Disposal,  MI (V);
Miami County Incinerator,  OH (V); MIDCO I, IN  (V); Mid-State  Disposal, WI (V); Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical,  MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical  (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Bayou
Sorrel, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR  (VI); Old  Inger, LA (VI); Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Doepke
Disposal  (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII);  Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal
Service, MO (VII); Martin Marietta,  Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Ogden  Defense  Depot, UT (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO  (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek  Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*;
Del Norte, CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX);  Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);
Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits,  CA (IX)*; Taputimu Farm,  AS (IX);
FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             469

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Phenols

Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Norwood PCBs,
MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI  (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Goose
Farm, NJ  (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-HDD, NY (II); Lipari
Landfill (09/30/85),  NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*;  Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love
Canal, NY (II);  Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Pijak Farm, NJ
(II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand  Restoration, NY (II);
Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland
Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II);  Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware  Sand and  Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III);  Douglassville  Disposal, PA
(III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical,  PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA
(III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Sand,  Gravel & Stone, MD  (III);
Westline,  PA (III); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products,  FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI  (V); E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH  (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN  (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar  &
Chemical  (St. Louis  Park), MN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V);  Velsicol  Chemical,  IL (V); Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX  (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Ellisville, MO
(VII); Northwestern  States Portland Cement, IA  (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII);
Burlington Northern (Somers),  MT (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Fairchild
Semicond (Mt. View),  CA (IX); Intel (Mountain  View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Selma  Pressure Treating, CA (IX);
Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*

Radioactive Materials

Glen Ridge Radium, NJ  (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange
Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Radium Chemical, NY (ID;
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation (09/22/89), PA (III)*;  Moyer Landfill, PA (III); United
Nuclear, NM (VI); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO  (VII)*; Denver Radium  Site
Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver  Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/12th &  Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium ROBCO, CO  (VIII)*; Monticello Mill Tailings
(DOE), UT (VIII);  Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Rocky Hats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII);
Teledyne  Wah Chang  Albany (TWCA), OR (X)

Solvents

Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);  Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
McKin, ME (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);  Stamina Mills, RI (I); Western  Sand & Gravel, RI
(I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I);  Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Burnt
 *       Subsequent Record of Decision
 S       Supplemental Record of Decision
 HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                               470

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS  SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Solvents (continued)

Fly Bog, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II);
Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II);
Solvent Savers, NY  (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal, NY (II); Avtex
Fibers, VA (III)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Enterprise
Avenue, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Henderson Road, PA (HI)*; Lackawanna Refuse
Site, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing, PA  (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Harris/Palm Bay
Facility, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Miami Drum Services,  FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V);
Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Berlin & Farro, MI  (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI
(V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hagen Farm,
WI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V);
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton-Interim Water
Treatment, MN (V)*; New  Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill, OH (V);  Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Summit National, OH (V);  Verona Well Field, MI  (V)*; Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK  (VI); Old Inger, LA  (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001),
OK (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville,  MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Fairchild  Semicond (Mt. View), CA  (IX);
Applied Materials, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX);
Indian Bend Wash,  AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA  (IX); Litchfield  Airport,
AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street,  AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);  Solvent Service, CA (IX); Taputimu
Farm, AS (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA  (IX);  Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders
Corner-IRM, WA (X);  Fort  Lewis Logistic  Center, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma,
WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)

TCE (Trichloroethylene)

Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT  (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Charles George,  MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid
Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe  Environmental
Services, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT  (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*;
McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA  (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield
Landfill (09/22/88), VT (I)*; Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,  MA (I); South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills,  RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I);
Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);  Wells G&H, MA (I); Western Sand  & Gravel, RI (I);
American Thermostat, NY  (II); American Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY
(II); Brewster Well Field (09/29/88), NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ
(II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ  (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ
(II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;  Combe
Fill South Landfill, NJ (II);  DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); DTmperio Property, NJ  (II); Ewan Property,
NJ (II);  Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ  (II)*; FAA  Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street,
NY (II); Kentucky Avenue  Wellfield, NY  (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang  Property, NJ (II); Lone
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              471

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

TCE (Trichloroethylene) (continued)

Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90),
NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ  (II)*; Old Bethpage, NY (II); Clean Well Field, NY (II);
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney  Farm, NY (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill,
NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vega
Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Bendix, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Butz Landfill,
PA (III);  Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fischer &
Porter, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA  (III); Heleva  Landfill, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); Keystone
Sanitation Landfill, PA (HI); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*;  Limestone Road,
MD (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield,  PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer
Landfill,  PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III);  Raymark, PA (III);
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's
Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; City Industries, FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Dubose  Oil
Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility,  FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL
(IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill,  FL (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F
Materials-HDD, IL (V);  Acme  Solvents, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL
(V)*; Byron Salvage Yard (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI  (V); Charlevoix (09/30/85),  MI (V)*;
Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V);
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*;
Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old
Landfill, WI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN
(V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie,
MN (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI
(V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI  (V)*; Miami  County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); National
Presto  Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),  MN (V); New  Brighton-Interim
Water Treatment, MN  (V)*; New  Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/St.  Anthony-IRM,
MN (V); New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN  (V)*; Northernaire
Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and  Chemical
Corporation, IN  (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI  (V); Onalaska Municipal  Landfill, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI  (V)*;  Pristine,
OH (V);  Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); South Andover, MN (V); Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM,
MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*;
Wausau  Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI);  Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI)*; Sol  Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South
Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere,
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              472

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS  SUBSTANCES DETECTED

TCE (Trichloroethylene) (continued)

John,  Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
(VII);  Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO  (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln  Dust #2 & #3),  UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU17), CO O/III)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18),
CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials,
CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Indian
Bend  Wash, AZ (IX); Intel  (Mountain View), CA  (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA
(IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ; Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA
(IX)*;  Operating Industries  (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA
(IX)*;  Purity Oil Sales, CA  (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX);  San Fernando
Valley (Area 1), CA  (IX); San Gabriel/Area  I,  CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA
(IX)*;  Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow  Acid  Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;  Tucson
International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA
(X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA  (X); Frontier  Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X);  Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South
Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA  (X)*; Western Processing, WA (X)

Toluene

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon  Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles  George, MA (I);
Industri-plex, MA  (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);  South  Municipal  Water Supply, NH (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I);
Yaworski  Lagoon,  CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89),  NJ (II)*; Bridgeport,
NJ (II);  Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson  Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II);
Combe  Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical,  NJ (II);
D'Imperio Property,  NJ  (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical
Center (09/28/90), NJ (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ  (II);
Hooker-102nd  Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85),
NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*;  Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand  & Gravel, NY (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY
(II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ  (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand  Restoration, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY  (II); Syosset
Landfill, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force  Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP,
PA 011); Henderson  Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD
(III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates,  PA (III)*; Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Sand  Gravel  &
Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill,  PA (III); Taylor Borough,
PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; A. L. Taylor, KY (IV); Airco, KY  (IV);
American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Chemtronics,  NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment),  NC (IV);
Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL  (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV);  Dubose Oil Products, FL
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              473

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Toluene

(IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site,
KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI  (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V); Forest Waste Disposal,
MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm,  WI (V); Hedblum  Industries, MI (V); K&L
Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service  Landfill, WI  (V); MIDCO I, IN
(V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance
Plant, MN (V); New  Brighton (TCAAP), MN  (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI  (V)*; Oak Grove Landfill,
MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal  Landfill, WI  (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI  (V)*; Republic
Steel Quarry, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); South Andover, MN  (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*;
Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well
Field, MI  (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Industrial  Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI);  Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street,  TX (VI);
Tinker AFB  (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA  (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);
Ellisville, MO (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm,
IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal  Service,
MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump,  IA  (VII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII);
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY  (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Fairchild
Semicond  (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel  (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil,  CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Louisiana-Pacific,  CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA
(IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA  (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*;
Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Raytheon,  CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western Processing,
WA (X)*

Xylenes

Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Old Springfield Landfill
(09/29/90), VT (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ  (II)*;  Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ  (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;
Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90),  NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*;
FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Higgins Farm,  NJ (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY  (II)*;  Lone Pine  Landfill, NJ  (II)*;
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific  Chemical Processing, NJ  (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532,  NJ (II); Dover Air Force
Base, DE  (III); Henderson Road, PA  (III)*; Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*;  Strasburg Landfill, PA
(III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); SCRDI Bluff
Road, SC  (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              474

-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS  SUBSTANCES DETECTED

Xylenes (continued)

(V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts
Disposal, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill,
WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V);  Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Northernaire Plating,
MI (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);  Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI  (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI
(V); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK  (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII);  Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint &  Wax, IA (VII);  Fairchild Semicond
(Mt. View), CA (IX); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery  Bridge at Highway 20,
WY (VIII); Fairchild  Semicond (S San Jose), CA  (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ  (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA  (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Solvent Service, CA  (IX)

CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Air

Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles George  Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Landfill & Resource
Recovery, RI (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Sylvester, NH  (I); Asbestos  Dump, NJ (II); Combe Fill South
Landfill, NJ (II); Diamond  Alkali, NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II);  Helen Kramer, NJ (II);  Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*;  Love Canal, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II);
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Saltville
Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Wade,  PA (III); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC  (IV); Berlin & Farro,  MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH  (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old  Landfill, WI  (V); Johns-Manville, IL
(V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI  (V); Outboard Marine, IL (V); Verona Well  Field-IRM, MI
(V); Wauconda Sand &  Gravel, IL (V)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill
Creek, MT (VIII); Denver Radium II, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium  III, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/12th & Quivas,  CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Coalinga Asbestos
Mine, CA (IX)*; Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2  & #3), UT (VIII); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX);
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*;  Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South  Bay Asbestos
Area  (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Taputimu Farm, AS  (IX); South Tacoma,  WA (X)

Debris

Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Norwood
PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Stamina Mills,  RI  (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski
Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*;  Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum,
NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*;  Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont  Polychemical, NY
(II)*; GE Wiring Devices, PR  (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY
(II); King  of Prussia, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace
Petrochemicals, NY (II); Montclair/West Orange  Radium, NJ (II);  Myers Property,  NJ (II); Radium
Chemical, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville  Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              475

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Debris

Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA
(III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers,  VA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Delaware  Sand
and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (HI); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air
Force Base,  DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Havertown PCP,
PA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD
(III); M.W.  Manufacturing,  PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Publicker/Cuyahoga
Wrecking, PA (III); Southern  Maryland Wood, MD  (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat
Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway  Six, NC (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN  (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination,  NC
(IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Lewisburg Dump,
TN (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL
(IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI  (V); Ionia
City Landfill, MI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil,
OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V);  Metamora Landfill, MI
(V)*; NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Summit National, OH  (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM  (VI); Cleve
Reber, LA (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Odessa  Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK
(VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO
(VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*;  White Farm  Equipment Dump, IA
(VII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*;  Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*;  Martin  Marietta,
Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE),  UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity
Properties,  UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties (09/29/89), UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial,
CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga  Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); MGM  Brakes, CA  (IX);
South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87),
WA (X); Martin Marietta,  OR (X)

Ground Water

Auburn Road,  NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I);  Baird & McGuire
(09/27/90),  MA (I)*; Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I);  Cannon Engineering,
MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3  & 4, MA
(I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH  (I); Davis Liquid Waste,  RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco
Pond, MA  (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services,
NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well  Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field  (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Laurel
Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);  Nyanza  Chemical,  MA  (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Ottati  &
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);
Re-Solve (09/24/87), MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery  Waste Pits, ME  (I)*; South
Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina  Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA  (I); Sylvester, NH (I);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              476

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Ground Water (continued)

Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek
Farm (06/28/89), NJ (II)*;  Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II);
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*;
Chemical  Control, NJ (II);  Chemical Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
(II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village
Well Field, NY (II); Ewan  Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Friedman
Property,  NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill,  NJ (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Higgins
Farm, NJ  (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY
(II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield (09/28/90),  NY (II)*; Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill  (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone  Pine
Landfill, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY  (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems
(09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township (06/30/88),  NJ (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); PAS Oswego,  NY (II);
Picatinny  Arsenal, NJ (II);  Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington  Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ  (II); Price Landfill (09/29/86), NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ  (II); Renora, Inc.,
NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway  Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ  (II); Sinclair
Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments,  NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Suffern
Village Well  Field, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ
(II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II);  Vega Alta,  PR (II); Vestal,
NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Volney  Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA (III);  Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Army Creek Landfill  (06/29/90), DE (III)*;
Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination,  PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit,
PA (HI); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon (09/29/86), PA  (III)*;
Butz Landfill, PA (III); Chisman  Creek, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill,
PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and  Gravel, DE (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal(Amendment), PA (III);  Drake Chemical, PA
(III); Drake Chemical (05/13/86), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion,  PA (III); Fischer & Porter, PA  (III);
Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA  (III); Henderson Road
(09/29/89), PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); Kane & Lombard,  MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Limestone Road, MD  (III); Lord Shope
Landfill, PA (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA  (III); McAdoo Associates, PA
(III)*; Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Spill,
DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone,  MD  (III);  Sand  Gravel & Stone (09/28/90), MD
(III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA  (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III);
Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US  Titanium, VA (III);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              477

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Ground Water (continued)

Wade, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Westline, PA (III); Westline, PA (III)*; West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill,
DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV);  Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote
Works, FL (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (TV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries,  FL (IV);  Coleman Evans,
FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment),  FL  (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Distler
Brickyard, KY (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Independent  Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV);
National  Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA  (IV);  Sapp Battery,
FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Sodyeco,
NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV);
Tower Chemical, FL (IV);  Varsol Spill Site, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits,
FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDO,  IL (V)*;  A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V);  Acme
Solvents, IL  (V); Algoma Municipal  Landfill, WI  (V); Allied/Ironton  Coke, OH (V)*; Arcanum Iron
& Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V);  Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH
(V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH  (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron Salvage
Yard, IL  (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix (09/30/85),
MI (V)*; Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V);  Clare Water  Supply,  MI  (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V);
Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail  (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM,  WI (V); Eau
Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Fisher Calo Chem,  IN  (V); FMC Corporation, MN  (V)*; Forest
Waste, MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne  Reduction, IN (V);  Galesburg/Koppers,
IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts  Disposal, WI  (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill (07/17/89), OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill,
WI (V); Johns-Manville,  IL (V); K&L  Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer
Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI  (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical
Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Well Field, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Master
Disposal  Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*;  Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);
MIDCO I, IN  (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial  Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New
Brighton/St. Anthony-IRM, MN (V);  New Brighton/Arden Hills/St.  Anthony, MN  (V)*; New
Brighton-Interim Water  Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*;  New
Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*;  Northernaire, MI (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and  Chemical  Corporation, IN (V); Novaco
Industries, MI (V); Oak  Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating,  WI
(V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Outboard Marine  Corp., IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V);  Reilly  Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar  & Chemical
(St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH  (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S.  Aviex, MI  (V);
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              478

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Ground Water (continued)

University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona
Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel (03/31/89), IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply,  WI
(V); Wausau Water Supply (09/29/89), WI  (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);  Wheeler Pit, WI  (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87),
LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel,  LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil
Lindsey, AR (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
Dixie Oil, TX  (VI); French Limited,  TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK  (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit
(06/26/87), TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR  (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South
Wood, AR (VI); Motco,  TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89),  TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI);
Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa  Chromium I (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Odessa  Chromium  II, TX
(VI); Odessa Chromium II (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products,  AR
(VI); Sand Springs, OK  (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol
Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street,  TX (VI); South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83,  NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tar
Creek,  OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier  Creek/Bldg.  3001), OK
(VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Aidex-IRM, IA  (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*;
Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*; Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des
Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday),  KS (VII); Fairfield Coal  Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Findett,  MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac  River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII);
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE  (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North  Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern
States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII);
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA  (VII); Waverly  Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal
Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT  (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water (12/30/88),  MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO
(VIII); Martin  Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Milltown-S,  MT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT  (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII);
Rocky  Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky  Mountain Arsenal
(OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII);
Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Applied Materials, CA  (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA  (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX);
Indian Bend Wash, AZ  (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX);
Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport,  AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ; Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX);
McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA  (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1) (09/29/88), CA (IX); San  Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas 1, 2 &  4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure  Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow
Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA  (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;  Tucson
International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert  Landfill, WA
(X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);  Frontier Hard
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              479

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Ground Water (continued)

Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders
Corner-IRM, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South
Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12 A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X); Western
Processing, WA (X); Western Processing (09/04/88), WA  (X)»

Sediments (Creek/River/Stream)

Auburn Road, NH (I); Baird  & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George
Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond,
MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA
(I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA
(I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); W.R.  Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski
Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*;  Brewster Well Field, NY
(II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Combe Fill
South Landfill, NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY
(II); Hudson River, NY (II); Kin-Buc  Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal  (10/26/87), NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel,
NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon  Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Wide
Beach, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ  (II); York
Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA
(III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; C&R  Battery, VA (III); Chisman
Creek, VA (III); Douglassville Disposal,  PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III);  L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Limestone
Road, MD (III); Millcreek, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne  Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton
Zinc, PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal  Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III);  Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Westline, PA (III);
West Virginia  Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Airco, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works,  FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving,
NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
(IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products,  FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal,
FL (IV)*; National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); North  Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery,
FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV);  Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV);
Yellow Water  Road, FL (IV); Zellwood,  FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Arcanum  Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead  Refinery, MN (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Burrows  Sanitation, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Fields Brook,  OH  (V); Forest Waste, MI  (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hunts
Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;  Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle  Electrical
Utilities, IL (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI  (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump,  IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and
Chemical  Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V);
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V);  Pristine (Amendment), OH  (V); Republic
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              480

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Sediments (Creek/River/Stream) (continued)

Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V);
Seymour,  IN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN
(V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI);
Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87), LA  (VI)*; Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber,  LA (VI); Crystal
Chemical, TX (VI); Sediments (Creek/River/Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);  Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX  (VI)*; North Cavalcade
Street, TX (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); South Calvacade
Street, TX (VI); Texarkarta Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Vertac, AR (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest  Laboratory, MO (VII);
Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); Burlington Northern
(Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; East
Helena, MT (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO
(VIII); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); MGM  Brakes, CA (IX); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)

Sludge

Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA
(I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA (I);  Yaworski  Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY
(II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Claremont  Polychemical, NY (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
(II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Woodland  Township Route 72,  NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ
(II); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE
(HI); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Enterprise Avenue, PA  (III); Fike Chemical,  WV (III); Lackawanna
Refuse Site, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL  (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Davie Landfill,  FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL  (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V);
Anderson Development, MI (V);  Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Berlin &  Farro,  MI (V); Bofors
Nobel,  MI (V);  Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Forest Waste IRM, MI (V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V)*;
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid  Disposal,  MI (V); Mason
County  Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI  (V); Newlyme, OH (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems,  TX (VI); Brio
Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);  Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Gurley
Pitt-Edd, AK (VI); Highlands Acid  Pit, TX (VI);  Mid-South Wood, AK (VI);  Motco, TX (VI); Old
Inger, LA (VI);  Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Pesses  Chemical, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pitts, TX (VI); Texarkana  Wood  Preserving, TX (VI);  Vertac, AR
(VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Weldon Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; White Farm Equipment Dump, IA  (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; McColl,  CA (IX); Purity Oil  Sales, CA (IX);
Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA  (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA),  OR (X)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             481

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Soil

Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Beacon Heights,
CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I);
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond,
MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I);  Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field,
CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM,  ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA
(I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);  Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo
Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA  (I); Re-Solve  (09/24/87), MA (I)*; Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),  NH (I); Western Sand &
Gravel, RI  (I); W.R. Grace (Acton  Plant),  MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT  (I); American Thermostat,
NY (II)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II);  Bog Creek Farm, NJ  (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport,
NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II);  Burnt Fly  Bog (09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II);
Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II);
Claremont  Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II);
Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property
(09/29/89), NJ  (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ  (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY  (II); FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical  Center (09/24/90), NJ (II)*;  Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau,
NY (II); GEMS Landfill,  NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium,  NJ (II); Glen
Ridge Radium, NJ (II)*; Goose Farm, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco
Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ  (II); Hyde
Park-EDO, NY  (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II);  Lang
Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II);  Lipari Landfill (07/11/88),  NJ  (II)*; ; Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II); Love Canal, NY  (II); Love Canal/93rd Street  School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY
(II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metal tec /Aerosystems,
NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium,  NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ
(II)*; Myers Property, NJ  (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); North Sea  Municipal Landfill, NY  (II); PAS Oswego,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak  Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ
(II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill,
NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ  (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY  (II);
SMS Instruments,  NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Swope Oil, NJ  (II); Syncon
Resins, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams  Property, NJ
(II); Woodland  Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland  Township Route 532, NJ (II); York  Oil, NY
(II); Aladdin Plating, PA  (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex
Fibers, VA (III)*; Bendix, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III);
Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA  (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig
Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force
Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA  (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*; Greenwood
Chemical,  VA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Hebelka  Auto Salvage Yard,
PA (HI); Henderson Road, PA  (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane &  Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lackawanna Refuse  Site, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA, (III); Lansdowne Radiation (09/22/86),  PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide,
WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                               482

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Soil (continued)

McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds,
VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (HI); Taylor Borough, PA (III);
Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's  Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment),  PA (III); US Titanium, VA
(III); Wade, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance  Works, WV (III);
West Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL  (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway
Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL
(IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC
(IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood  Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,  NC (IV)*;
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman  Evans, FL  (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV);
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich,  B.F., KY (IV);  Hipps Road Landfill,  FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV);
Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Lewisburg  Dump,
TN (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood  Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's  Steel-EDD, FL (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill,  FL  (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powersville  Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill  Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV);  Wamchem,  SC  (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV);
Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL  (V);
A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*; Acme Solvents, IL (V); Algoma Municipal  Landfill,  WI (V);  Allied/Ironton Coke,
OH  (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V);  Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere  Landfill, IL (V); Berlin & Farro, MI  (V);
Big D Campground, OH (V);  Bower's  Landfill,  OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage
Yard, IL (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL  (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Distler
Brickyard, KY (V); E.H.  Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo  Chem, IN (V); Forest  Waste-IRM, MI (V);  Forest
Waste, MI (V)*; Forest Waste  Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne  Reduction,  IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);
Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal,  WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI  (V);
K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial,  MI  (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V);
LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;  Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar  Oil
(06/30/89), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal,  MI (V); Main  Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V);
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V);  Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Morris Arsenic, MN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V);  New Lyme,  OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills  (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation
and  Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove  Landfill, MN  (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill,
OH  (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill,  WI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL  (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment),
IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH  (V); Reilly  Tar, MN (V);  Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN  (V)*;
Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI  (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI  (V)*;
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); St.  Louis River, MN (V); Summit National, OH  (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI
(V);  University of Minnesota,  MN (V); Velsicol  Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Wauconda Sand
& Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel (03/31/89), IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste
Oil,  IN (V);  Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood,  AR  (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca  (03/31/87), LA (VI)*; Bayou
Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining,  TX (VI);  Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Crystal Chemical,
TX (VI); Crystal City, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX  (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley
Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);  Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR  (VI); Jacksonville  Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Inger,  LA (VI); Old Midland
Products, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical  Systems, TX (VI); Rogers Road
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                                  483

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Soil (continued)

Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol
Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tenth
Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Creosoting
(09/29/89), TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump,
KS  (VII)*; Big  River Sand, KS (VII);  Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII);
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site  Area, MO  (VII)*; (VII);
Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek,  MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric
Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times  Beach, MO (VII);
Times Beach (09/28/88), MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII);  Broderick Wood Products, CO
(VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT  (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/llth & Umatilla,  CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Card  Property, CO (VIII)*;  Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT  (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII);
Milltown-S,  MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
(VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII);
Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical, CO  (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Atlas  Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA
(IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA  (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA
(IX); Fairchild  Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX);  IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX);  Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); McColl,  CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX);
Motorola 52nd Street, AZ  (IX); Raytheon,  CA (IX); Selma  Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent
Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*;
Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Taputimu  Farm, AS (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart  Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA  (X); FMC
Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier Hard  Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta,
OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X);  Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);  Ponders Corner-IRM,  WA
(X); Ponders Comer, WA (X)*; Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma, WA  (X); South
Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA  (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)*

Surface Water

Auburn Road, NH (I); Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill  (09/28/90), CT (I);
Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond,  MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH  (I)*;
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             484

-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

Surface Water (continued)

Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati &
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Sylvester, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field,
NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II);
Chemical Insecticide,  NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);  GEMS
Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty
Farm, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II);
Love Canal, NY (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Pijak  Farm, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Sharkey
Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill,  DE (III); Avtex  Fibers, VA  (III);
Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*;
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*;
Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fischer & Porter  PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE
(III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lackawanna Refuse
Site, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (HI)*; Millcreek,  PA  (III); Moyer
Landfill, PA  (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA
(III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel &  Stone, MD Surface  Water (III);
Southern  Maryland Wood, MD (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III);  Tyson's  Dump, PA (III); US
Titanium, VA (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Dubose  Oil Products, FL (IV); Gallaway
Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (VI); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Disposal,  FL (IV)*; National Starch, NC (IV); North Hollywood Dump,  TN (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL
(IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV);  Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical,  FL (IV); Whitehouse Waste
Oil Pits, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery,
MN (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI  (V);
Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak
Grove Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating,  WI (V); Old  Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine,
OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry,  OH (V);
Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Arkwood,
AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou  Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bio-Ecology Systems, TX
(VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit,
TX (VI)*;  Mid-South Wood,  AR (VI); Motco,  TX (VI); Old  Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX  (VI); Sikes Disposal  Pits, TX (VI); Tar Creek,  OK (VI); Fulbright/Sac  River Landfill,
MO (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service,  MO (VII);
California Gulch, CO  (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Silver
Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor
Chemical, CA (IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Iron Mountain  Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); McColl, CA  (IX); Stringfellow Acid  Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid  Pits (06/25/87),
CA (IX)*; Western Processing, WA (X)*
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              485

-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND  ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS

Direct Contact

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex,  MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I);
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (1); Keefe Environmental Services,  NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field,
CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs,  MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill  (09/29/90), VT  (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal
Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Wells G&H,  MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA  (I); Yaworski  Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY  (II);  American Thermostat
(06/29/90),  NY (II)*; Brewster  Well Field,  NY  (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum,
NY (II)*; Chemical Insecticide,  NJ (II); Chemical  Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont
Polychemical (09/28/90),  NY (II)*; DeRewal  Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond  Alkali, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Forest
Glen  Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR  (II); Glen Ridge
Radium, NJ  (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Higgins Farm, NJ (II);  Hooker
Chemical/Ruco Polymer,  NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals,
NJ (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY  (II); Kentucky  Avenue Wellfield, NY
(II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);  King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone
Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd  Street School,
NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);  Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);  Marathon Battery
(09/30/88),  NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange
Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery  Township, NJ (II); Myers  Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ
(II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington
Landfill, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ  (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill,  NJ (II);  Roebling Steel, NJ  (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville  Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing,  NJ (II); Sealand
Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers,  NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY  (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical,
NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick  Aerospace, NJ  (II);  Williams Property, NJ  (II); Woodland
Township Route  72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III);  Ambler  Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE  (III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA
(III); Avtex  Fibers (09/28/90),  VA (III)*; Bendix, PA  (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Butz
Landfill, PA (III); C&R  Battery, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills,  DE (III); Craig Farm
Drum, PA (III); Croydon  TCE  Spill, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand  and Gravel, DE  (III); Dorney Road  Landfill,  PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air  Force  Base,  DE  (III); Drake Chemical, PA  (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA
(III); Fike Chemical, WV  (III);  Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood  Chemical, VA  (III);
Havertown  PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road,  PA  (III); Henderson Road (09/28/89), PA (III)*; Hranica
Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard,  MD (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill,  PA (III); Kimberton, PA
(III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III);
Middletown Airfield, PA (III);  M.W.  Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA
(III)*; New  Castle Spill, DE (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works  Disposal, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas  (Amendment),  WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA  (III); Palmerton
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                               486

-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS

Direct Contact (continued)

Zinc,  PA (HI)*; Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone,
MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump
(Amendment), PA  (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump #1 (09/28/90), PA (III)*; Walsh
Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works
(09/30/88), WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV);  Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV);  American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood
Preserving, FL (IV); Bypass  601 Groundwater Contamination,  NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV);
Cape  Fear Wood Preserving, NC  (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); City
Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans  Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL  (IV); Dubose Oil Products,
FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV);  Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich,  B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay
Facility, FL (IV); Howe Valley  Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery,
FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery  Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport
Landfill, FL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); National  Starch, NC (IV); North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Powersville  Landfill, GA (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal,  FL  (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodeyco, NC (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL  (IV); Wamchem,
SC (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater  Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda,  OH  (V); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Anderson
Development, MI (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere  Landfill, IL (V); Big  D Campground,
OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow  Dump, MI (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH  (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill,  OH  (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN
(V)*; Forest Waste-IRM, MI  (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen  Farm, WI  (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);
Industrial  Excess Landfill, OH  (V);  Ionia  City Landfill, MI  (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill,  MN (V)*;  Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; Kysor
Industrial, MI (V);  LaSalle Electrical Utilities,  IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal,
MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN  (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service
Landfill, WI (V); Metamora  Landfill, MI  (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V);
Mid-State  Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead
Smelt, IL (V); National Presto Industries, WI  (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN  (V);
New Brighton/Arden Hills  (TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP); MN (V)*;
NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto  Parts, MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump
(06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside  Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation,  IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);  Rose Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Seymour,  IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI  (V)*;
Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); St.  Louis River, MN  (V); Summit  National,  OH (V); Tri-State
Plating, IN (V); U.S.  Aviex,  MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University  of Minnesota, MN (V);
Velsicol Chemical,  IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*;  Wausau Water  Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply
(09/29/89), WI (V)*;  Wedzeb Enterprises, IN  (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR  (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                            487

-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS

Direct Contact (continued)

(VI)*; Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); North Cavalcade Street,  TX (VI); Odessa Chromium
I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX
(VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services  (09/27/89), TX (VI)*;  Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX
(VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United  Nuclear, NM (VI);
Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump,  KS (VII); Chemplex,  IA (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Kem-Pest Laboratory,  MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits,
MO (VII); Syntex  Verona, MO  (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII);
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon  Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal  Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products,
CO (VIII); Burlington  Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Central City/Clear  Creek, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO  (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th &
Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver  Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello  Mill Tailings (DOE),
UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway  20, WY (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant
(DOE), CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*;
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver  Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX);  IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel  (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara  III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);  Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);  Litchfield Airport
(09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX);  Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot,  CA (IX); San Fernando
Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area  1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 &
4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent  Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area,
CA (IX)*; Stringfellow  Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ
(IX); Watkins Johnson  (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore  (09/30/89), WA (X); Frontier
Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);
Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR  (X); Martin Marietta,  OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID  (X); Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
 *       Subsequent Record of Decision
 S       Supplemental Record of Decision
 HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                             488

-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS

Public Exposure

Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt
Fly Bog, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II);
Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal (10/26/87), NY (II)*; Ludlow
Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II);
Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA  (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing,
PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Saltville Waste Disposal  Ponds, VA (III); West
Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,
NC (IV)*; National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
Sodeyco, NC (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Eau Claire
Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill,
MI (V); Miami County incinerator, OH (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation
and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL
(V); Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Deere, John,
Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac  River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek,
MO (VII)*;  Missouri  Electric Works, MO  (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO  (VII); Times Beach, MO
(VII)*; California Gulch, CO (VIII);  Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth  & Umatilla, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open  Space, CO (VIII)*; Coalinga
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); McColl, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area
1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2  & 4), CA (IX)*; South Bay  Asbestos Area, CA (IX);
Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X);  Martin Marietta, OR (X)

REMEDY  SELECTION

ARAR Waiver

Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*;  Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); E.H. Schilling Landfill,  OH
(V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Silver
Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII)

Institutional Controls

Beacon Heights, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield
Landfill, VT (I);  Old Springfield Landfill  (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's  Salvage Yard, ME (I);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             489

-------
REMEDY SELECTION

Institutional  Controls (continued)

Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal
Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination,
NJ (II); Clothier Disposal, NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton
Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);  Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Higgins Farm,  NJ (II);
Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia,  NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); M&T DeLisa Landfill, NJ (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II);
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Olean Well Field,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply  1-1, NY (II)*; Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles,  PA (III);  Avtex Fibers,  VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit,  PA (III); Brown's Battery  Breaking, PA (III); C&R Battery,
VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum,
PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*;  Hranica Landfill, PA (III);
Industrial Lane, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord
Shope Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Spill,  DE (III);  Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment),
WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III);  Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA  (III);
Tybouts Corner, DE  (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA  (III)*; US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III);
Westline, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV  (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works
(09/30/88), WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill,  DE (III); Wildcat Landfill,  DE (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL
(IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American  Creosote Works, FL (IV);
Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater  Contamination,
NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC  (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL
(IV); Dubose Oil  Products, FL (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road
Landfill,  FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); National Starch & Chemical, NC (IV)*; Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's  Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville
Road  Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL
(IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Algoma  Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery,  MN (V); Belvidere
Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL
(V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke),  IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V);
IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill,  WI  (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill,  MI (V);
Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN  (V); Mason County
Landfill, MI (V);  Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
Morris Arsenic,  MN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead
Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical  Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old  Mill, OH (V);
Onalaska Municipal  Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI  (V)*;  Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar  & Chemical,  MN (V)*; Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              490

-------
REMEDY SELECTION

Institutional Controls (continued)

(USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste  Oil, IN (V);
Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Atchison/Santa  Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal Chemical,
TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX  (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK  (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,  AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood
Products; AR (VI); Motco, TX  (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI);
Old Inger, LA (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; South Cavalcade Street,
TX (VI); South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood  Preserving,  TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX
(VI); Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County, KS
(VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deer, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke  Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII);  Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO
(VII); Lindsay Manufacturing,  NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri  Electric Works, MO  (VII); Solid State Circuits,
MO (VII); Times  Beach, MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO  (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver
Radium Site Streets,  CO (VIII); Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Libby  Ground Water, MT
(VIII); Libby Ground Water (12/30/88), MT (VIII)*;  Monticello Mill  Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust  #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Silver
Bow Creek, MT (VIII);  Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas Asbestos
Mine, CA (IX);  Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga  Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA (IX)*;
Intel (Santa Clara HI), CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H.  Baxter, CA (IX);
Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos
Area, CA  (IX); South Bay  Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division),
CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA
(X); Commencement  Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*;  Martin  Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide
and Fur,  ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma
Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Western  Processing, WA (X)*

Interim Remedy

New Bedford,  MA (I);  Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II);
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky  Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II);  Sealand Restoration,
NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III);  Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*;
Fike Chemical,  WV (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA
(III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III);  Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III);
Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III);
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill, WI  (V); New  Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),
MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Cherokee
County/Galena, KS (VII);  Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Weldon Spring
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             491

-------
REMEDY SELECTION

Interim Remedy (continued)

Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Anaconda  Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); California Gulch,
CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/11th & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th
& Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground  Water, MT (VIII)*;
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU22), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek,
MT (VIII); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1),
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX);  San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); Silver
Mountain Mine, WA (X);  Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Gould, OR (X); Teledyne Wah Chang
Albany (TWCA), OR (X)

No Action Remedy

Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beachwood/Berkeley Well, NJ (II); BEC Trucking, NY (II); Cooper  Road,
NJ (II); Friedman Property, NJ (II); M&T DeLisa  Landfill, NJ (II); Pijak  Farm, NJ (II); Pomona  Oaks
Well Contamination, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Price Landfill
(09/29/86), NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood  Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ  (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Suffern Village Well
Field, NY (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal,
NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Vineland State School, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill,  DE (III); Bally  Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (HI); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III);
Middletown Road, MD (III);  New Castle Steel DE (III); Presque Isle, PA (III);  Reeser's Landfill, PA
(III); Taylor Borough, PA  (III)*; Voortman Farm, PA (III); Westline, PA  (III)*; Westline
(Amendment), PA (III)*; Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Independent Nail, SC  (IV)*; Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); National Starch & Chemical, NC (IV)*; Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Varsol  Spill,
FL (IV); Adrian Municipal Well  Field, MN (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);
Morris Arsenic,  MN (V); NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Peterson  Sand & Gravel, IL
(V); Poer Farm,  IN (V); Union Scrap  Iron Metal,  MN (V); Whitehall Municipal Wells, MI (V); Cecil
Lindsey, AR (VI); Gurley  Pit, AR (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Homestake Mining, NM  (VI);
Pagano Salvage, NM (VI); Sand  Springs, OK (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Stewco,
TX (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*;  Big River Sand, KS (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (FAR-MAR-CO), NE (VII); John's  Sludge Pond, KS (VII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU22), CO (VIII)*; Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Toftdahl Drum, WA  (X)*

O & M

Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road  Landfill, NH  (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA  (I); Baird & McGuire
(09/14/89), MA (I)*; Baird & McGuire (09/27/90),  MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT  (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid  Waste, RI  (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I);  Iron Horse  Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              492

-------
REMEDY SELECTION

O & M (continued)

Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well
Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT
(I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Ottati &  Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's
Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery
Waste  Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH  (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD,  ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Asbestos  Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*;  Chemical Insecticide, NJ
(II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy,  NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater
Contamination, NJ  (II); Claremont Polychemical,  NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill
North  Landfill, NJ  (II); Combe Fill South  Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical,  NJ (II); Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ
(II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center
(09/28/90), NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II);  GE Moreau, NY (II);
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ  (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II);  Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, KY (II); Kentucky Avenue  Wellfield (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ  (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill,  NJ (II)*;  Love Canal, NY (II);  Love Canal/93rd
Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88),  NY  (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY
(II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ  (II)*; Montgomery
Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old
Bethpage, NY (II); PAS  Oswego, NY  (II);  Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Sarney
Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill,  NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand
Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply  1-1, NY
(II)*; Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland  Township Route 532, NJ (II); Army  Creek
Landfill, DE  (III)*; Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin  Lagoon (09/29/86), PA (III)*;  Butz Landfill, PA
(III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA  (III); Chisman Creek (03/31/88), VA (III)*; Coker's
Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA  (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem (09/28/90), PA  (HI)*;
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III);
Drake  Chemical,  PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Fike
Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III);  Henderson Road, PA (III);
Henderson Road  (09/29/89), PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA  (III); Kane &  Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (HI); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*;  L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III);  Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Limestone Road, MD  (III); Lord Shope
Landfill, PA  (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); Middletown Airfield,  PA (III); Millcreek, PA
(III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal
Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA  (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire,
VA (III); Saltville Waste  Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III);  Tybouts Corner Landfill,  DE  (III); Tyson's
Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA
(III); West Virginia  Ordnance Works, VA  (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works  (09/30/88), WV  (III)*;
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement  Decision Document
                                              493

-------
REMEDY SELECTION

O & M (continued)

62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV);
Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL
(IV); City Industries,  FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV);  Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill,  FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill,  KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery Disposal, FL  (TV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport  Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch,
NC (IV); National Starch & Chemical, NC (IV)*; Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC
(IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand,  FL (IV);
Powersville Landfill,  GA  (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff  Road, SC  (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC
(IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC  (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold
Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer  Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse
Waste  Oil Pits, FL (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V); Algoma  Municipal  Landfill, WI
(V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Anderson  Development, MI (V);  Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH
(V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals,  MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D
Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel,  MI (V); Bower's  Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V);
Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL  (V);  Byron Salvage Yard, IL  (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V);
Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Clare  Water Supply, MI (V);  Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton
Landfill,  OH (V); Cross Brothers  Pail  (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire
Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC
Corporation, MN  (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH  (V)*; Ionia City Landfill,  MI (V);
Janesville Ash Beds,  WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI  (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill,  MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial,
MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Marion/Bragg
Landfill,  IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal  Service Landfill, WI  (V);
Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,  WI (V); National Presto Industries,
WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump,  IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump
(06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI  (V)*; Northside  Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak  Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);  Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);  Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL  (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly
Tar &  Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI
(V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR  (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of
Minnesota, MN (V);  Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI  (V); Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN  (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             494

-------
REMEDY SELECTION

O & M (continued)

Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump,
MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA  (VI)*;
Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio  Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM
(VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX
(VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);  Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK
(VI); Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste
Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South
Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium  I, TX (VI);  Odessa Chromium I (03/18/88), TX
(VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II  (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Old Inger,  LA (VI);
Passes Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR
(VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX
(VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); Texarkana
Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK  (VI); United Creosoting, TX
(VI); United Creosoting (09/29/89), TX (VI)*; United  Nuclear, NM (VI);  Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA
(VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex,  IA  (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);
Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical,  MO (VII);  Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA
(VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);  Ellisville Site Area, MO
(VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill,
MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park),  NE  (VII); Hastings
Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric
Works, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence  Farm,
IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE  (VII); Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII);
California Gulch, CO  (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/11th &  Umatilla, CO  (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver  Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO  (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water (12/30/88), MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta,
Denver  Aerospace, CO (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement  (Kiln
Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sharon Steel
(Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT  (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union
Pacific, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials,
CA (IX); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA  (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA  (IX)*;  Fairchild  Semicond  (Mt.
View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA  (IX);  Indian Bend  Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
(Mountain  View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III),  CA (IX); Intersil, CA  (IX); Iron Mountain  Mine,
CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum,  CA (IX); Motorola 52nd  Street, AZ
(IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*;  Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX);
Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX);  San Fernando Valley  (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA
(IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas  1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay  Asbestos
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             495

-------
REMEDY SELECTION

O & M (continued)

Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow,
CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX);
Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X);
Ponders Corner-IRM, WA (X); Silver Mountain  Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A,
WA (X)*; Toftdahl  Drum, WA (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*

ROD Amendment

Picillo Farm (Amendment), RI (I); Tinkharns Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (HI); Westline (Amendment),
PA (III)*; Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV
(III); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV);  Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); New  Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V);  Pristine (Amendment), OH  (V); Rose Township (Amendment), MI  (V);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Woodbury Chemical (Amendment), CO (VIII); Operating
Industries Landfill  (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Ponders Corner/Lakewood (Amendment), WA (X);
Western  processing (Amendment), WA (X)

WATER  SUPPLY

Alternate Water Supply

Auburn Road, NH (I): Charles George, MA  (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kellogg-Deering  Well
Field, CT (I)*; Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); American  Thermostat, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II);
Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY  (II);  Haviland
Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Well Field, NY (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ
(II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township  Housing,
NJ (II)*; Nascolite,  NJ  (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II);
Vega Alta, PR (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Butz Landfill,  PA (III); Chisman  Creek, VA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III);  Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Fischer &  Porter,  PA (III); Industrial Lane, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Strasburg Landfill,  PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III);  Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC (IV); Pickettville  Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Acme
Solvents, IL  (V); Allied/Ironton  Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Byron Salvage, IL
(V)*; Byron Salvage (06/30/89),  IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire
Municipal Well Field,  WI (V)*; Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Kummer Landfill, MN (V); Lake
Sandy Jo, IN (V);  Miami County Incinerator, OH  (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); National Presto
Industries, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New  Brighton-Water Supply
System, MN  (V)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); South Andover, MN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI
(V);  Verona  Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI);
Odessa Chromium II,  TX (VI); South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);
Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII);  Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA
(VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Libby Ground  Water, MT  (VIII); Libby Ground Water  (12/30/88),
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             496

-------
WATER SUPPLY

Alternate Water Supply (continued)

MT (VIII)*; Milltown, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Silver Mountain  Mine, WA (X)

Drinking Water Contaminants

Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage
Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);  South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendmment), NH (I); W.R. Grace  (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski
Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II);  American Thermostat (06/20/90), NY (II)*; Brewster
Well Field, NY (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*; Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines,  NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination,  NJ (II); Combe Fill South
Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY
(II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins  Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Well Field (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township,
NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing,  NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough Well Field, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ  (II);  SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply  1-1, NY (II)*;
Williams Property, NJ  (II); Avtex Fibers,  VA  (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Chisman  Creek, VA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III);
Cryo-Chem (09/28/90), PA (III)*; Delaware Sand  and Gravel, DE (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*;
Industrial Lane,  PA (III); Kimberton, PA  (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; Middletown Airfield,
PA (III);  New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Walsh Landfill,
PA (III);  Wildcat Landfill, DE  (III); 62nd  Street  Dump, FL (IV);  Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
(IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M  Oil), SC  (IV); Harris/Palm Bay
Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV);
National Starch, NC  (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Sodyeco,  NC  (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical  (LeMoyne Plant),  AL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood
Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bofors Nobel,  MI (V); Bower's
Landfill,  OH (V); Byron Johnson Salvage  Yard, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Clare Water
Supply, MI (V);  Eau  Claire-IRM, WI (V);  Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*;  Fisher Calo
Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill,
OH (V);  Industrial Excess Landfill (07/17/89), OH (V)*; K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary
Landfill,  MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN  (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V);
Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason  County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State  Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New
Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony,  MN (V)*; Northernaire  Plating, MI (V)*;  Northside Sanitary
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             497

-------
WATER SUPPLY

Drinking Water Contaminants (continued)

Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI  (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN
(V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI
(V)*; Tower Chemical, FL (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V);  U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota,
MN (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL
(V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX
(VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa  Chromium II (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88),
TX (VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*;
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK  (VI); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee
County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,  NE (VII)*; Vogel
Paint  & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination,  NE  (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service,
MO (VII); Arsenic  Trioxide, ND (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway
20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Smuggler
Mountain, CO (VIII); Applied  Materials, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond  (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield  Airport, AZ
(IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd  Street, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX);  San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX);
San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4)*, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport,
AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill,  WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*;  Martin Marietta,  OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X)

Floodplain

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;  New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood  PCBs,  MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH  (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); Yaworski  Lagoon, CT (I);  Burnt  Fly Bog, NJ  (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*;
Chemical Control,  NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson  Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Clothier Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II);  Florence Landfill, NJ
(II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kentucky
Avenue Wellfield,  NY (II)*; Kin-Buc  Landfill, NJ (II); King of  Prussia, NJ (II);  Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ  (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific  Chemical Processing, NJ  (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Vestal
Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler
Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Bendix,  PA (III); Brown's  Battery Breaking, PA (HI);  Bruin
Lagoon, PA (III)*;  Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover
Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA
(III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Tyson
Dump #1, PA (III)*; US Titanium, VA  (III);  West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill,  DE  (III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88), DE (III)*; American
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              498

-------
WATER SUPPLY

Floodplain (continued)

Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (01/05/89), FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill,
FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling  Battery, FL (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); A&F Materials, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V);
Auto  Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); FMC Corporation,  MN (V)*; Fort Wayne  Reduction, IN  (V); Ionia
City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill,  WI (V); Laskin/Poplar
Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Miami County Incinerator,
OH (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; St. Louis River, MN  (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN
(V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);  Bayou  Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87), LA
(VI)*;  Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries,
TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Gurley Pit (09/26/88), AR (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Highlands Acid Pit (06/26/87), TX (VI)*; Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*;  Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan  Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX
(VI)*;  Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI);  Texarkana  Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX  (VI)*; Vertac, AR  (VI);
Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big  River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Deere, John,
Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Findett,  MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill,  MO (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII);
Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO  (VII)*; Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO
(VII)*; White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII);  Denver
Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials,
CA (IX); East Helena, MT (VIII); Monticello  Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX);
Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*;  Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); San
Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay  Asbestos
Area  (09/29/89), CA (IX)*;  Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89),  WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Teledyne Wah  Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)

Sole-Source Aquifer

Davis Liquid Waste, RI  (I);  Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ
(II); Rockaway Borough  Wellfield, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY  (II); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Biscayne Aquifer
Sites,  FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Clare Water Supply, MI (V);  Master
Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Odessa  Chromium I, TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB  (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;  Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue,
NE (VII); Waverly  Groundwater Contamination, NE  (VII); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Purity Oil Sales,
CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);  Watkins Johnson
(Stewart Division),  CA (IX); Northside Landfill, WA  (X)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             499

-------
WATER  SUPPLY

Wetlands

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I);
Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); New Bedford, MA (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits,  ME (I)*; Stamina Mills,
RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89),  NJ (II)*; Bridgeport, NJ
(II); Burnt Fly Bog,  NJ (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical
Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman  Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy,  NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,
NY (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ  (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
Mannheim Avenue  Dump, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems,  NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); PAS
Oswego, NY (II); Renora Inc.,  NJ  (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ
(II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Wide  Beach, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland
Township Route 532, NJ (II); Ambler  Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek  Landfill, DE (III)*; Avtex
Fibers, VA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek
(03/31/88), VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE  (III); L.A. Clarke &
Son, VA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Sand Gravel
& Stone, MD (III)*;  Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Westline, PA
(III); West Virginia  Ordnance Works,  WV  (III); West Virginia Ordnance  Works (09/30/88),  WV
(III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88),  DE
(III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Flowood,  MS (IV); Geiger
(C&M Oil), SC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*;  Munisport Landfill, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL  (IV); Zellwood,  FL (IV);
Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal  Landfill,  WI (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bofors  Nobel, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction,  IN (V); Hedblum Industries, MI  (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal  Service
Landfill,  WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN  (V)*;
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant,  MN (V); Oak Grove Landfill,  MN (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill,  WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical,  MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical
(09/29/90), MI (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park)
(09/28/90), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI  (V);  Schmaltz Dump, WI (V);  Schmaltz Dump, WI  (V)*;
Waste Disposal Engineering, MN  (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Gurley Pit,
AR (VI); Homestake Mining, NM (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI);
Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Lindsay  Manufacturing, NE (VII);  Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT
(VIII); Rocky Hats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); South Bay Asbestos  Area,
CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89),
WA (X)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              500

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Hybrid/Alternate Closure

Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); C&R Battery, VA (III); Kane &
Lombard, MD (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Johns-Mansville, IL (V) Oconomowoc Electroplating,
WI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X)

ARARs (Used as a keyword from FY 1982 - 1988 only)

Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Laurel
Park, CT (I);  Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH  (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*;
Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);  American Thermostat, NY (II); Asbestos  Dump,
NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field,  NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ  (II); GE Moreau,  NY (II);
GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY; Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*;  Love
Canal, NY (II)*;  Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Rocky Hill, NJ (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ  (II)*; Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II);  Vega Alta, PR (II);  Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles,  PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III);
Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA  (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III);  Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III):
Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire  Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds,
VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (HI); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Westline, PA
(III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV  (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat
Landfill, DE (III); Airco, KY (IV);  Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil),
SC (IV): Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); National Starch,  NC (IV);  Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Palmetto
Wood Preserving,  SC (IV); Perdido  Groundwater,  AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sodeyco,
NC (IV); Tower  Chemical, FL (IV); Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Wamchem,  SC (IV); Zellwood,
FL (IV); Allied/Ironton  Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere  Landfill, IL (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Eau
Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
IMC Terre Haute,  IN (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V);  Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; LaSalle
Electrical Utilities,  IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN
(V); Marion/Bragg Landfill,  IN (V); Mason  County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*;
NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN
(V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex,
MI (V); Velsicol  Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal  Engineering, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),
NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca,  LA (VI)*;  Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             501

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

ARARs (Used as a keyword from FY 1982 - 1988 only) (continued)

Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French
Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood  Products, AR
(VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa  Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Old Midland  Products, AR (VI); Petro-Chemical System, TX (VI); Sand  Springs, OK (VI)*; Sol
Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South
Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*;  South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*;  United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City
Dump, KS (VII); Big River Sand, KS (VII);  Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA  (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII);
Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE
(VII)*; Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*;
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State  Circuits, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO  (VII); Times
Beach, MO (VII)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick  Wood  Products, CO (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property,
CO (VIII)*; Denver  Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Indian
Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes,
CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX);Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*;  Operating
Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA
(IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Stringfellow  Acid Pits,
CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ  (IX); Colbert Landfills, WA  (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X);  Frontier Hard  Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta,  OR (X);  Pacific Hide and  Fur, ID (X)

Clean Air Act

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering,  MA (I); Charles George  Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley  Landfill, NH  (I);  Groveland
Wells, MA (I);  Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well  Field, CT  (I)*;  Landfill  &
Resource Recovery, RI (I);  Laurel Park, CT (I);  New  Bedford, MA (I); Norwood  PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME  (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,  MA (I);
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H,  MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I);  Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman  Tank
Lines, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well
Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical  Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton
Terminals, NY  (II);  Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King  of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Myers  Property, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Radium
Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ  (II); Solvent Savers,  NY (II); Syosset
Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Woodland
Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532,  NJ (II); Ambler  Asbestos Piles,  PA
(III); Bally Groundwater  Contamination, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover  Air Force Base,
DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV  (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Keystone
Sanitation Landfill,  PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              502

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Clean Air Act (continued)

Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Raymark, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Airco,
KY (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese/Shelby
Fibers, NC (IV)*; City Industries,  FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV);
Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich,  B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps
Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Big D
Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI  (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI  (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V);  Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City
Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*;
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Master  Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval  Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant,  MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Northernaire  Plating, MI (V)*;
Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical, MI (V)*; Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR  (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour,
IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI  (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S.
Aviex, MI (V); University  of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wausau Water  Supply,
WI (V)*; Wayne  Waste Oil, IN  (V); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French  Limited, TX (VI); Gurley  Pit,
AR (VI); Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI); Tinker  AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI);
United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Solid State Circuits, MO  (VII); Vogel Paint  & Wax, IA
(VII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Monticello  Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at  Highway
20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16),  CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO  (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek,
MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD  (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX): Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/28/90), CA (IX)*;  Intersil, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales,
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); Solvent  Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos
Area, CA (IX); South Bay  Asbestos  Area  (09/29/89), CA  (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;  Gould, OR
(X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Tcledyne Wah Chang Albany
(TWCA), OR (X)

Clean Water Act

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird &  McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste,  RI (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical,
NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill &
Resource Recovery,  RI (I); ; Laurel Park,  CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT  (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA
(I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);  Saco Tannery Waste Pits,  ME  (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply,
NH (I); Stamina  Mills, RI  (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American  Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat
(06/29/90), NY (II)*; Chemical  Control, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Endicott Village Well  Field,
NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue W^'field,
NY (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ  (II)*; Marathon Battery
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             503

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Clean Water Act (continued)

(09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II);
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); South
Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II); Vega Alta,  PR (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Woodland Township Route
72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route  532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE
(III)*; Avtex  Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Butz
Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon  TCE Spill, PA
(III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA  (III)*; Fike
Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown
PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill,
PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke  & Son, VA  (III); M.W.
Manufacturing (06/29/90),  PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV  (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc,  PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III);
Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III);  Saltville  Waste  Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD
(III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump  #1, PA (III)*;
West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV);
Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries,
FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);  Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV);
Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment),  FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery,  FL (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump,
TN (IV);  Munisport Landfill,  FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold,
MS (IV);  North Hollywood Dump, TN  (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road,
SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold  Creek), AL (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant),  AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL  (IV); Wamchem, SC  (IV);
Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood  Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV);  Allied/Ironton
Coke, OH (V)*; Anderson Development, MI (V); Big D  Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Clare Water Supply, MI (V);  Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V);
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN  (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL  (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Ionia City
Landfill,  MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI  (V); LaSalle Electrical
Utilities,  IL (V)*;  Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI  (V); Master Disposal Service
Landfill,  WI (V);  Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);  MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V); Ninth Avenue  Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI  (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI  (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical  (St.  Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose
Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI),  IL (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V);
Summit National, OH (V);  University of Minnesota, MN (V);  U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical,
IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste  Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel,
IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI  (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI);
Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited,  TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI)*;  Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX
(VI); Odessa  Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI);  Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001),  OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI);  Arkansas City Dump, KS
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              504

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Clean Water Act (continued)

(VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO
(VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Vogel Paint  &
Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
(VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East
Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM  (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Operating
Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating  Industries (09/30/88), CA  (IX)*; Operating Industries
Landfill (Amendment)  (09/28/90), CA (IX)*; Ordot Landfill, GU (IX);  Purity Oil  Sales, CA (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX);  Solvent Service, CA (IX); South  Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid
Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA  (IX)*; Colbert Landfill, WA  (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA  (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);
Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside Landfill, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang
Albany  (TWCA), OR (X)

Water Quality  Criteria

Coakley Landfill, NH (I); New  Bedford, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American  Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*; Chemical
Control, NJ (II)*;  Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Fulton Terminals,  NY (II); Katonah Municipal
Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield,  NY (II)*; Lipari  Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*;
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Preferred Plating, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Solvent Savers,
NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE  (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III);  Bally Groundwater Contamination,
PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE  (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson Road, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA
(III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*;  Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump,  PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV  (III)*;
Wildcat Landfill,  DE (III)*;  62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco,  KY (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving,
NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman
Evans, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products,  FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL
(IV)*; Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville
Road Landfill, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);  Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Eau  Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI
(V)*; Hedblum  Industries, MI (V);  Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial  Excess Landfill,  OH (V)*;
Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); New
Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI
(V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation  and  Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S.
Aviex, MI (V);  Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI  (V); Waite  Park  Wells, MN
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand &  Gravel,  IL (V)*; Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V); Brio Refining, TX  (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              505

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Water Quality Criteria (continued)

Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control,
AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX  (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; United Creosoting,  TX (VI)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
(VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII);  Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII);
Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Silver Bow
Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine,  CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos
Mine, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport,  AZ (IX) Ordot Landfill, GU
(IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore,  WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier  Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside
Landfill,  WA (X)

RCRA

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Baird & McGuire (09/27/90), MA  (I)*;
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge  Metallurgical, NH (I);  Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;  Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park,  CT (I);  New
Bedford, MA  (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old
Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
South Municipal Water Supply, NH  (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams
Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Western Sand &  Gravel, RI  (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American  Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Cinnaminson
Groundwater  Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II);
Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);  GE
Wiring Devices, PR (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II);  Imperial Oil/Champion  Chemicals, NJ (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ  (II); King  of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ  (II)*;  Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal,  NY (II)*;
Ludlow Sand  & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ  (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88),
NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; PAS Oswego,  NY
(II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Radium
Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY  (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); South Brunswick
Landfill,  NJ (II)*; Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical,  NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route  532,
NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA  (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex  Fibers,
VA (III)*; Bendix,  PA (III); Berks  Sand Pit, PA  (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum,  PA
(III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,  PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE  (III);
Dorney  Road  Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air  Force Base, DE (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV  (III); Fike Chemical  (09/28/90),  WV (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III);  Henderson
Road (06/30/88), PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III);  Keystone  Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope  Landfill, PA (III);  M.W.  Manufacturing,  PA (III);  M.W.
Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE  (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Publicker/Cuyahoga
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision  Document
                                              506

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

RCRA (continued)

Wrecking, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds,
VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV);  Alpha Chemical, FL (IV);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV); Amnicola
Dump, TN (IV); Biscayne  Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving,  FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,  NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV);  Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL
(IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility,  FL (IV); Howe Valley  Landfill,  KY  (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal,  FL (IV)*; Newport Dump
Site, KY  (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV);
Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold
Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood,
FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater  Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH
(V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum  Iron &  Metal, OH (V);
Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Big D  Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill,
OH (V);  Burrows Sanitation, MI  (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow  Dump,  MI (V); Cross
Brothers Pail (Pembroke),  IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V);  Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V);  Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers,  IL (V); Hunts Disposal, WI  (V); IMC Terre  Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill,  OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville  Ash  Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill,
WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer  Sanitary Landfill, MN
(V)*; Kysor  Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities,  IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V);  Mason County Landfill, MI
(V); Master  Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,  WI (V);  NL Industries/Taracorp  Lead  Smelt, IL
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump,  IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN  (V)*;  Northernaire Plating,
MI (V); Northernaire Plating (09/29/89), MI (V)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating,
WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical (09/29/90), MI  (V)*; Pristine, OH '(V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park),  MN (V)*; Republic Steel  Quarry, OH  (V); Sangamo/Crab
Orchard  NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg  Landfill, MI (V)*; St.  Louis River,
MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); Tri-State  Plating, IN (V);  U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of
Minnesota, MN (V);  Velsicol Chemical, IL  (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel,  IL (V)*; Wayne Waste
Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI);
Bailey Waste Disposal, TX  (VI); Cleve Reber,  LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI);  Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR  (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR  (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana,  TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX
(VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR  (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*;  Sol Lynn
(03/25/88),  TX (VI);  South Calvacade Street, TX  (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker
AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA
(VII)*; Arkansas City Dump,KS (VII); Chemplex, IA  (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday),  KS  (VII);
Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield  Coal  Gasification Plant,  IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              507

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

RCRA (continued)

Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*;
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence
Farm, IA (VII); Vogel  Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII);  Burlington Northern (Somers), MT
(VIII); Central City/Gear Creek, CO (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2  & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant
(DOE), CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial  (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*;
Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII);  Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA
(IX); Fairchild Semicond (San Jose),  CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara HI), CA  (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H.
Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield  Airport
(09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Operating Industries
(11/16/87), CA (IX)*;  Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA
(IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1),  CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX);
Selma Pressure Treating,  CA  (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)  Commencement Bay/Nearshore,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89),  WA (X)*; Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA
(X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);  Frontier Hard Chrome
(07/05/88), WA (X)*;  Gould,  OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific
Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA  (X)*

Closure Requirements

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI
(I);  Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport,
NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue
Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand
& Gravel, NY (II);  Picatinny Arsenal, NJ  (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II);  Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vineland Chemical,
NJ (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel,  DE
(III); Dorney  Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA  (III); Enterprise
Avenue, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III);  Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Moyer Landfill, PA  (III);
M.W. Manufacturing,  PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Tyson's
Dump (Amendment),  PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA  (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV  (III)*;
Whitmoyer Laboratories,  PA  (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment),
NC (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV);  Pickettville Road  Landfill, FL  (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Auto  Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Allied/Ironton  Coke,  OH  (V)*; Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI  (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hunts Disposal,  WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);
Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI  (V);
Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL
(V); Rose Township, MI (V);  Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand
& Gravel, IL (V)*; Windom Dump,  MN (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI);  Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Pesses  Chemical, TX  (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke  Disposal (Holliday),  KS  (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             508

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Closure Requirements (continued)

(VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Martin Marietta,
Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Operating Industries  Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure
Treating, CA  (IX); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); South Tacoma,
WA (X);  Western Processing, WA (X)*

Clean Closure

American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ  (II)*;  Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring
Devices,  PR (ID; King of Prussia, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); C&R
Battery, VA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP,  PA (III); Ordnance  Works
Disposal, WV (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD  (III); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
Vertac, AR (VI); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X)

Landfill  Closure

Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI  (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Love Canal/93rd  Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Dover Air Force Base,
DE (III);  Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); M.W.  Manufacturing, PA  (III)*; Ordnance Works
Disposal  (Amendment), WV (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's  Dump (Amendment), PA (III);
US Titanium, VA (III); Chemtronics (Amendment),  NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL
(IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Bower's Landfill, OH (V); E.H.
Schilling  Landfill, OH (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville,  IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V);  Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);  Oak Grove Landfill, MN
(V); Summit National, OH (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Crystal Chemical, TX  (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
Rogers Road  Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Operating Industries Landfill
(Amendment), CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill,  WA  (X)

Safe Drinking Water Act

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT  (I); Cannon  Engineering, MA (I);
Charles George  Landfill 3  & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);  Davis  Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH  (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well  Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I);  Norwood  PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I);
Old Springfield  Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield  Landfill (09/29/90), VT  (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard,
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision  Document
                                             509

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Safe Drinking Water Act (continued)

ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South
Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace  (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon,
CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Chemical  Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field,
NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ  (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90),
NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE  Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hooker-102nd
Street, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue  Dump, NJ (II); Marathon  Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township,  NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ
(II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY  (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II);
Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vestal
Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;  Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Williams Property,
NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA  (III);
Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*;  Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA
(III)*; Keystone Sanitation  Landfill, PA  (III); Kimberton, PA (III);  Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope
Landfill,  PA (III); Middletown  Airfield, PA (III); New  Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA
(III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel &  Stone, MD (III)*; Voortman Farm,  PA  (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV);  Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC  (IV);
Celanese Fibers Operations,  NC  (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries,
FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose  Oil Products, FL (IV);
Flowood, MS (IV); Harris/Palm  Bay Facility,  FL (IV);  Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV);
Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL  (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump,  TN (IV); National Starch, NC (IV);
Newsorne Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS  (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido
Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm,  KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (Cold  Creek), AL  (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne  Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL
(IV); Zellwood, FL 
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Safe Drinking Water Act (continued)

Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN  (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township
Dump, MI  (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol  Chemical, IL
(V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL
(V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil IN (V);
Windom Dump, MN  (V); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste
Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium II, TX  (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol  Lynn (09/23/88),  TX (VI)*;
South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM  (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83,  NM
(VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX  (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big  River
Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA  (VII);
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII);  Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA  (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint  & Wax,
IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling  Disposal Service, MO (VII);
Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East Helena, MT
(VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery
Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky  Flats Plant (DOE), CO
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*;
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial,  CO (VIII); Silver  Bow  Creek,
MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA  (IX);  Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild  Semicond (S
San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA  (IX); Indian Bend Wash,  AZ  (IX); Intel (Mountain View),
CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA  (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);  Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes,
CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento
Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area  1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area  1)
(06/30/89), CA (IX)*;  San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*;  Selma Pressure Treating, CA
(IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA  (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome  (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X); Silver Mountain  Mine, WA (X)

MCLs

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon  Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon  Engineering, MA  (I);
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,  MA (I); Saco Tannery  Waste
Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills,  RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA
(I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton  Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Leaman  Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination,  NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field,
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             511

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

MCLs (continued)

NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90),
NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm,
NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY
(II)*; Metal tec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Old Bethpage,  NY (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II);
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ  (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY
(II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump,
NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit,  PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Craig
Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem (09/28/90),
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield,  PA
(III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone,
MD (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Walsh Landfill, PA (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six,  NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV);
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL
(IV); Coleman-Evans  Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);
Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL  (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL
(FV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal
(03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV);  National  Starch,  NC (IV); Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV);  Pickettville Road Landfill, FL  (IV);  SCRDI Bluff
Road, SC  (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's  Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL
(IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI  (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V);  Big D Campground, OH (V);  Bofors
Nobel, MI (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*;  E.H.  Schilling
Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fisher Calo Chem,  IN (V); Forest Waste  Disposal, MI
(V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old  Landfill, WI  (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial,  MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL
(V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V);  Long Prairie, MN (V);  Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V);  MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant,
MN  (V);  New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*;
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V);  Ninth Avenue Dump  (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI
(V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova  Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment),  OH  (V); Rose Township, MI
(V); Schmaltz  Dump,  WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover,  MN (V);  Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V);
Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply,  WI (V)*;
Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Brio  Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM
(VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX  (VI);  Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             512

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

MCLs (continued)

Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade
Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade  Street, TX (VI); South
Valley/Edmunds  Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX
(VI); Tinker AFB  (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS
(VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly
Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East  Helena, MT (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;  Martin  Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20,  WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Hats  Plant (DOE), CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),  CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Sand  Creek Industrial, CO
(VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt.  View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA  (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel
(Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);  Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz  Barrel & Drum, CA (IX);
MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA  (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA
(IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX)*;
San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma  Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service,
CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA  (X);  Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside Landfill, WA (X); Silver
Mountain Mine, WA (X)

MCLGs

Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Rose Disposal Pit,  MA (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Kentucky Avenue
Wellfield, NY  (II)*; Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson  Road,  PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*;
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);  Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Osborne Landfill,  PA (III);
Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV);  Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV);  City Industries, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products,
FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment),  FL (IV);  Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal,  FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Bofors Nobel, MI
(V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hunts  Disposal, WI (V); IMC Terre  Haute, IN (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI  (V); Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V);
Wayne Waste Oil, IN  (V); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Missouri Electric Works,  MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA  (VII); Martin Marietta, Denver
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             513

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

MCLGs (continued)

Aerospace, CO (VIII); Rocky Rats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Solvent Service, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX)

State Standards/Regulations/Guidance

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering,  MA (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA  (I);
Iron Horse Park,  MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill  & Resource Recovery, RI (I); New Bedford, MA (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old  Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard,
ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*;  Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal  Water Supply, NH
(I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace  (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American
Thermostat (06/29/90),  NY (II)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron  Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy,
NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;
Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II);
Endicott  Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan  Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau,
NY (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II)*; Goose  Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins
Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Katonah
Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield
(09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ  (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88),
NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love  Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery
(09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ  (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II);
Old Bethpage, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY
(II); Preferred Plating, NY  (II); Radium  Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ  (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II);
Ringwood Mines/Land fill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney  Farm,  NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ
(II); Scientific Chemical  Processing, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS
Instruments,  NY  (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Swope Oil,  NJ (II); Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II);
Syosset Landfill,  NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn  Manufacturing, PR (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II);  Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil,  NY (II);
Aladdin  Plating,  PA (HI); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler  Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA
(III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Avtex  Fibers (09/28/90), VA  (III)*; Bally
Groundwater Contamination,  PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA
(III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal  (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III);  Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt.
Zion, PA (III);  Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical,  VA  (III); Havertown  PCP, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope  Landfill, PA
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              514

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

State  Standards/Regulations/Guidance (continued)

(III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; New Castle, DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton
Zinc,  PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*;
Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA  (III); Tyson's Dump, PA
(III)*;  Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill,  DE (III);  62nd Street Dump,  FL (IV); Alpha Chemical,
FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV);
Cape  Fear Wood  Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers  Operations, NC  (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,
NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV);
Coleman Evans, FL  (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood  Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road
Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill,  KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*;  Lewisburg Dump,  TN (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL
(IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA
(IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV);
Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater  Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco  Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Auto Ion Chemicals (09/27/89), MI (V); Big  D Campground, OH (V); Bofors
Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill,  OH  (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*;  Clare Water Supply, MI (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross  Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC  Corporation,  MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*;  Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI  (V);  Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*;  Kysor Industrial,  MI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V);
Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI
(V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V);
National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance  Plant, MN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; NL Industries/Taracorp Lead
Smelt, IL (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary  Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN  (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska  Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI  (V)*;
Pristine,  OH  (V);  Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Sangamo/Crab
Orchard  NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill,
MI  (V)*;  Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Summit National, OH  (V);
Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN  (V); Waite Park Wells,
MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand  & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);  Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom  Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),  NM (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining,
NM (VI); Dixie Oil,  TX (VI); Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK  (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX  (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol  Lynn (03/25/88), TX
(VI); South Calvacade Street, TX  (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street,  NM (VI)*;  South Valley/PL-83,
NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6,  NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII);
Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee  County,  KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision  Document
                                             515

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

State Standards/Regulations/Guidance (continued)

Deere,  John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville Site Area,
MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East
Industrial Park), NE (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII);
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits,MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times
Beach,  MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly
Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*;
Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings
(DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY
(VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky
Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23),
CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand  Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon
Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow  Creek,  MT (VIII);  Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*;  Fairchild Semicond (Mt.  View), CA (IX); Fairchild  Semicond
(S San  Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose),  CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX);  Intel (Mountain View),
CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield  Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport
(09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries
(11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating  Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*;  Operating  Industries Landfill
(Amendment), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA
(IX); San Fernando  Valley (Area  1), CA  (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas  1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA
(IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos  Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA
(IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome  (12/30/87), WA (X); Frontier Hard  Chrome (07/05/88),  WA
(X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill,  WA (X); Northwest  Transformer, WA (X); Silver
Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA  (X)*; Teledyne Wah Chang Albany
(TWCA), OR (X)

Drinking Water Standards (FY 1982 - 1988 only)

Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);  GE Moreau, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Reich Farm,
NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Upjohn  Manufacturing, PR (II); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Old Inger, LA  (IV); Tri-City
Conservation, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;  Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute,
IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN  (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              516

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Drinking Water Standards (FY 1982 - 1988 only) (continued)

NM (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa  Chromium II, TX (VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM
(VI); South ValIey/PL-83, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Milltown, MT (VIII); Indian Bend
Wash, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); United Chrome, OR (X)

Toxic Substances Control Act

Cannon Engineering, MA (I); New Bedford, MA  (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I);
Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); Burnt  Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ
(II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II);
Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY  (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II);  Roebling Steel, NJ
(II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); York Oil, NY  (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles,
PA (III);  Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV);  Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Disposal, FL (IV)*; Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV);
Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Conservation and
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fields Brook, OH  (V); Fisher
Calo Chem, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); New  Brighton/Arden
Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*;
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine,  OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*;  Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI Control
Act (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL  (V); Verona  Well Field-IRM, MI
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V);
Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); North Calvacade Street,
TX (VI);  Sheridan Disposal  Services, TX (VI); Sol  Lynn  (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street,
TX (VI);  Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard,  OK (VI);  Conservation Chemical,  MO (VII); Deere, John,
Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Missouri  Electric Works, MO (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits
(USDOE), MO (VII)*; Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX);
South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(07/05/88), WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X);  Pacific  Hide and Fur, ID (X)

Public Health Advisory

Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Myers Property, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles,  PA (III); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Teledyne  Wah  Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
Baird & McGuire,  MA (I)*;  Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I);  Iron  Horse Park, MA (I); Norwood
PCBs, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II);
Goose Farm, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Ambler
Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III);
Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA  (III); Delaware Sand  and Gravel, DE (III); Fike Chemical,
WV (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC  (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV);  Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS  (IV); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V);  Hedblum Industries, MI  (V); Kysor  Industrial, MI (V);  MIDCO I, IN (V);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             517

-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE

Public Health Advisory (continued)

New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oconomowoc
Electroplating, Wl (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V);

State Permit

Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); South Calvacade Street,  TX (VI); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII);
Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump,  IA (VII); IBM (San
Jose), CA  (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA  (X)

TESTING/PILOT STUDIES

Leachability Tests

Iron Horse Park, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);  American Thermostat, NY (II)*;
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ  (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*;
Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
(II); Picatinny  Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington  Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); C&R Battery, VA (III); US Titanium, VA (III);  Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL
(IV); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); United Scrap  Lead, OH (V); University of
Minnesota, MN  (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);  Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Rogers
Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United  Creosoting, TX
(VI)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Midwest  Manufacturing/North  Farm, IA (VII);  Missouri Electric
Works, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII);  Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); East Helena,
MT (VIII); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)

Treatabiliry Studies

Beacon Heights  Landfill, CT (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I);
New Bedford, MA  (I); Norwood  PCBs, MA  (I); O'Connor, ME (I);  Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*;  Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's  Ledge, MA (I);
Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),  NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R.
Grace  (Acton  Plant), MA (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ  (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ
(II)*; GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ
(II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia,  NJ (II); Mannheim  Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Montclair/West  Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ  (II)*; Myers Property,
NJ (II); Preferred Plating,  NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY
(II); Scientific  Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II);
Vineland  Chemical, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route  72, NJ (II); Woodland  Township Route 532,
NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex  Fibers, VA  (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Bendix, PA  (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA  (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson
Road,  PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA
(III)*;  Ordnance  Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              518

-------
TESTING/PILOT STUDIES

Treatability Studies (continued)

Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*;  Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA,
(III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway
Six, NC (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (01/05/89), FL (IV);
Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving
(Amendment), FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery,  FL (IV);  Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL
(IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Sodyeco,
NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV);
Yellow Water Road, FL  (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
(V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora
Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); Ninth Avenue  Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Arkwood,  AR (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX
(VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Odessa  Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa
Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Old Inger,  LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn
(09/23/88), TX (VI)*; Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings  Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Groundwater Contamination  (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE  (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern
(Somers), MT (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek,  CO (VIII); East Helena, MT  (VIII); Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU18),
CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Fairchild  Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Santa
Clara III), CA  (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); San Gabriel
Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX);  Stringfellow, CA  (IX)*; Watkins Johnson
(Stewart Division), CA  (IX); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Northwest Transformer,  WA (X)

TECHNOLOGY

Aeration

Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); McKin, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes,
NH (I); Army  Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Bendix,  PA (III); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);
Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM  (VI)*;
Triangle Chem., TX (VI); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Indian  Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area
1), CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             519

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Air Monitoring

Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*;
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog
Creek Farm, NJ  (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Fulton Terminals,
NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II)*; Imperial Oil/Champion
Chemicals, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange
Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange  Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; North Sea Municipal Landfill,
NY (II); Sayreville  Landfill, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY  (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II);  Woodland
Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township  Route 532, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
(III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Drake Chemical,  PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Airco, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Howe Valley Landfill,
KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Forest Waste  Disposal, MI (V)*; Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds,  WI (V); Janesville Old  Landfill, WI  (V);
Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal,
WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN  (V); Brio Refining, TX  (VI); Dixie Oil, TX  (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);  Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving,
TX (VI); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;  Missouri  Electric Works, MO  (VII); Solid State
Circuits, MO (VII); Monticello  Mill Tailings (DOE), UT  (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY
(VIII); Rocky  Mountain Arsenal (OU16),  CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*;
Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga  Asbestos  Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond  (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); J.H.  Baxter, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX),
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
Raytheon, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area,  CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X);
Gould, OR (X)

Air Stripping

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Coakley  Landfill,  NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Industri-plex,
MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);  Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well  Field  (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*;  Brewster Well Field, NY (II);
Byron Barrel  & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell  Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)»;
Chemical  Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Claremont  Polychemical, NY (II)*; Endicott  Village Well
Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);
Haviland  Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY  (II);  Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)»;
King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Lang Property, NJ (II); Mannheim Avenue
Dump, NJ (II); Metal tec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township  Housing, NJ (II)*; Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rocky  Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump,  NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta,
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              520

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Air Stripping (continued)

PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township
Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA
(III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (HI)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*;
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA  (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III);
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (09/30/88), PA (III)*;
Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Airco,  KY (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY  (IV); Harris/Palm  Bay Facility, FL
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Hollingsworth,  FL  (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY
(IV); Munisport Landfill,  FL (IV); National Starch, NC  (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI
(V); Clare Water Supply,  MI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V);
Janesville Old Landfill,  WI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V);
Liquid Disposal, MI (V);  Long Prairie, MN  (V);  Main Street Well  Field,  IN (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill,  WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN
(V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN  (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating,
WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V); Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI
(V)*; University of Minnesota, MN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MA (V); Verona
Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water
Supply (09/29/89), WI  (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South
Valley/Edmunds  Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Des  Moines TCE, IA (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works,  MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint &
Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
(VII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense  Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial,  CO (VIII); Applied Materials,
CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond  (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM
(San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales,
CA (IX); San Fernando  Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas 1, 2 & 4),  CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA  (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Ponders Corner-IRM,
WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Ponders  Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma, WA (X);
South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A,  WA (X)*

Biodegradation/Land Application

Iron Horse Park,  MA (I);  Tinkhams  Garage, NH (I); Renora Inc. NJ. (II); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Whitmoyer Laboratories,  PA (III);  American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Brown Wood  Preserving, FL
(IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL  (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL (V); Cliff/Dow Dump,
MI (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);  Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Atchinson/Santa  Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); North Cavalcade,
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             521

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Biodegradation/Land Application (continued)

TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal
Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)

Capping

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights, CT (I); Charles George, MA (I)*;  Coakley Landfill,
NH (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Nyanza Chemical,
MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati  & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);
Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA  (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD,  ME (I);
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon,  CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ  (II); Burnt Fly
Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South
Landfill, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE
Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Goose  Farm, NJ (II); Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88),
NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School,  NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II);  Old Bethpage, NY  (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand  Restoration, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II);  Sinclair
Refinery, NY (II); Swope Oil,  NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY  (II);  Volney Landfill, NY (II); Ambler
Asbestos Piles, PA  (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA  (III); Army Creek Landfill,  DE (III);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum,
PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake  Chemical, PA (III); East Mt.
Zion, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III);  Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*;
Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);
McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA
(III)*; Ordnance Works  Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance  Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc,  PA (III)*;  Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's  Dump, PA
(III); US Titanium, VA (III); Wade, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance
Works, WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco,  KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); A. L.
Taylor, KY (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Davie  Landfill,  FL (IV); Flowood,  MS (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); North
Hollywood  Dump, TN  (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL  (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere  Landfill, IL (V); Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest
Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash  Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old  Landfill, WI
(V); Johns-Manville, IL  (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor
Industrial,  MI (V); Laskin/Poplar  Oil, OH (V);  Liquid Disposal, MI (V);  Marion/Bragg Landfill, MI
(V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill,
MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO  II, IN (V); Mid-State
Disposal, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth  Avenue
Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation,
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              522

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Capping (continued)

IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN  (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom
Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems Site,
TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX, (VI); Gurley Pit, AR, (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR
(VI); Motco, TX  (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA  (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern Slates Portland Cement,  IA (VII); Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/12th  & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO  (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE),
UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO
(VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Selma
Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Watkins
Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Silver Mountain  Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A,
WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*

Carbon  Adsorption (GAC)

Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH  (I)*; Baird & Beacon Heights, CT (I); Coakley
Landfill, NH (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH  (I); Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT  (I)*; McGuire, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old  Springfield
Landfill, VT (I);  Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
Stamina Mills, RI (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*;  Bog Creek
Farm, NJ  (II)*; Chemical  Leaman Tank Lines,  NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Ground water Contamination, NJ  (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II);
Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Metal tec/Aerosy stems, NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Myers
Property,  NJ (II); North Sea Municipal  Landfill, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
(II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich  Farm, NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Solvent
Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vestal  Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Bendix, PA
(III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA  (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem (09/28/90), PA (III)*;
Kimberton, PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA  (III);  M.W. Manufacturing, PA  (III)*; Osborne Landfill,
PA (HI); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern  Maryland  Wood,  MD (III);
Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*;  Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN  (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment),  FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich,
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             523

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Carbon Adsorption (GAC) (continued)

B.F., KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Wamchem, SC (IV); Anderson
Development, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen  Farm, WI
(V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI
(V); Metamora Landfill,  MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee
Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Interim Water Treatment, MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;
New Lyme, OH (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL  (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical  (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Outboard
Marine  (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly  Tar &
Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical  (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*;
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump,  MN (V); Arkwood, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tenth
Street Dump/Junkyard,  OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);  Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII);  Hastings Groundwater, NE  (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE
(VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing,  NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); White  Farm Equipment
Dump,  IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products,  CO  (VIII); Martin Marietta,  Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel  (Santa Clara  III), CA
(IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant),  CA (IX); Litchfield Airport,  AZ (IX); Litchfield
Airport (09/26/89), AZ  (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA
(IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area  1), CA  (IX); San Gabriel  Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1,  2  &
4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA  (IX)*;  Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Northside
Landfill, WA (X)

Decontamination

Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse  Park, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY  (II)*;  Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II) Ewan Property,  NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ
(II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Vineland  Chemical, NJ (II); Avtex  Fibers, VA
(III)*; Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III);  Dover Air  Force Base, DE  (III); Fike Chemical,  WV (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Whitmoyer  Laboratories, PA (HI); American Creosote
Works,  TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump,  IN  (V)*;  Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);  United Scrap Lead, OH (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX  (VI);  Rogers
Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI);  Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII);  Shenandoah Stables, MO  (VII)*;  Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA  (IX)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             524

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Dredging

Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's
Ledge, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hudson River, NY
(II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon
Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood,  MD (III); Cape Fear Wood  Preserving, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Anderson
Development, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill,  OH (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Outboard
Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI);
Tar Creek, OK (VI); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X)

Excavation

Baird &  McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*;  Beacon Heights, CT (I);  Beacon Heights
Landfill,  CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I);  Charles  George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley
Landfill,  NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ottati  & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Hocomonco Pond,
MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza
Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve,
MA (I)*;  Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH  (I); Wells G&H, MA  (I);  W.R. Grace (Acton Plant),
MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek  Farm, NJ (II); Bog  Creek Farm (03/31/89), NJ
(II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II);  Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog
(09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/28/89),
NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE  Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring
Devices,  PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen  Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY  (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II);  King of Prussia,  NJ  (II); Krysowaty  Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property,
NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love  Canal, NY (II); Ludlow Sand  & Gravel, NY  (II);
Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*;  Mattiace
Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II);
Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Myers Property,  NJ (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II);
Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ  (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II);  Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II);
Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY  (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II);
Vineland Chemical, NJ  (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ  (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams Property, NJ
(II); York Oil, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72,  NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ
(II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Avtex Fibers (09/28/90),  VA (III)*; Berks Sand
Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig  Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (HI); Douglassville  Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (HI); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical,
PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA
(III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road  (06/30/88), PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III);  Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*;
Leetown  Pesticide, WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA  (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates,
PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (HI); M.W.  Manufacturing,  PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90),  PA
(III)*; Ordnance  Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal  Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Osborne  Landfill, PA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD  (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); US Titanium, VA (HI);
Westline,  PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works,  WV (III);  62nd Street Dump, FL  (IV); Aberdeen
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              525

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Excavation (continued)

Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American
Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans
Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Dubose
Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV);
Goodrich, B.F.,  KY (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL  (IV)*; Miami  Drum Services, FL (IV);
Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old  Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood
Dump, TN (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Sapp
Battery, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow
Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL
(IV); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson
Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Berlin &  Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL (V); Cemetery
Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH  (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Cross
Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H.  Schilling Landfill,  OH (V);  Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI
(V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator,  OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead  Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire,
MI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard
Marine  (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment),  OH (V); Republic Steel
Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*;
Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River,
MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN  (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa
Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87), LA (VI)*; Bayou
Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA  (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Geneva
Industries, TX (VI);  Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);  Hardage/Criner, OK  (VI); Jacksonville
Municipal Landfill,  AR (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX(VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI);
Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA  (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);
Petro-Chemical Systems, TX  (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn  (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade
Street, TX (VI); Tenth Street  Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Creosoting (09/29/89), TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA
(VII)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal
Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings
Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Kern-Pest  Laboratory, MO (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm,  IA  (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri
Electric Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach,
MO (VII); Times Beach (09/28/88), MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Weldon Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits  (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                             526

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Excavation (continued)

(Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Sapce, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; East Helena,  MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin
Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Ogden Defense
Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT
(VIII); Smuggler  Mountain,  CO (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD  (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works,
CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine
(09/28/90), CA (IX)*; Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),  CA (IX); IBM (San Jose),
CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville  Plant), CA (IX); McCoIl, CA (IX);  MGM  Brakes, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA
(IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89),  WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87),
WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest  Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide
and  Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA  (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD,  WA  (X); Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well  12A,  WA  (X)*; Teledyne Wah
Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*

Filling

Baird & McGuire, MA  (I)*;  Iron Horse Park, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); South Municipal Water  Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge,  MA (I); GE  Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90),  NJ  (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III)*; Greenwood Chemical,  VA (III); Lehigh Electric,  PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA
(III); Wade, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*;  Airco, KY (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Coleman Evans, FL (FV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*;
Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto  Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar  Oil, OH (V); Miami County  Incinerator, OH (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve
Reber, LA (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX  (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI);
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*;  Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Monticello Vicinity  Properties, UT (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury  Chemical, CO (VIII), Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*;
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX);  MGM Brakes, CA (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X)

Ground Water Monitoring

Auburn Road Landfill,  NH (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill  3 & 4, MA
(I)*;  Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Groveland Wells,  MA (I); Hocomonco  Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex,
MA  (I); Kearsarge
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             527

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Ground Water Monitoring (continued)

Metallurgical,  NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;  Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I);
Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park,
CT (I); McKin, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I);Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Ottati &  Goss/Great Lakes,
NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,
MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste  Pits, ME  (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI
(I); Sullivan's  Ledge, MA  (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton  Plant), MA (I); Yaworski  Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*;  Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); BEC Trucking,  NY (II);  Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*;  Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*;
Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ  (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater  Contamination, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Endicott
Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA
Technical Center, NJ (II);  Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II);  GE Moreau, NY
(II); Haviland  Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd  Street, NY (II); Hyde
Park-EDD,  NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky  Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky
Avenue Well  Field (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ  (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II);  Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone  Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim  Avenue Dump, NJ
(II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY  (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ  (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems
(09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township,  NY (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea  Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); PAS Oswego,
NY (II); Pepe  Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Pomona Oaks Well  Contamination, NJ; Port
Washington Landfill, NY  (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II);  Price Landfill, NJ (II)*;  Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Ringwood  Mines/Land fill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ
(II); Scientific  Chemical Processing,  NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ
(II)*; Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY  (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II);
Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega  Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland
Chemical, NJ  (II); Vineland State School, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY  (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ
(II); Woodland Township  Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ  (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III);  Army Creek  Landfill  (06/29/90), DE (III)*; Avtex
Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA
(III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek,
VA (III); Clothier  Disposal,NY (II); Coker's Sanitation Service  Landfills, DE (III);  Croydon TCE Spill,
PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA  (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel,
DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Henderson Road,
PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III);  Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA (III);  Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A.  Clarke & Son, VA (III); Limestone
Road, MD  (III); Middletown  Airfield, PA  (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing, PA (III)*;  New Castle Spill, DE (III); Ordnance Works  Disposal Areas (Amendment),
WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Reeser's Landfill,
PA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III);  Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Taylor Borough,
PA (III)*; Tybouts Corner, DE  (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*;  Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA  (III);
Tyson Dump  #1, PA  (III)*; Voortman  Farm, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Westline,  PA (III)*;  Wildcat  Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill,  DE
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              528

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Ground Water Monitoring (continued)

(III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN
(IV); Brown Wood  Preserving, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
(IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy,
AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds,
TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery  Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL
(PvO; National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood
Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL
(IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Smith's Farm,
KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*; Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke,  OH (V)*; Anderson Development, MI  (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH  (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron Salvage, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Clare
Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI  (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem,  IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum  Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill,  OH (V)*; Ionia  City Landfill, MI (V);
Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; Kysor
Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Long Prairie, MN (V);
Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill,
WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO
II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); National  Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance  Plant,  MN  (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89),  IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Novaco
Industries, MI (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical
(09/29/90), MI (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH  (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar  & Chemical (St. Louis Park),
MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz
Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour,  IN (V)*; South Andover,  MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH  (V); University of Minnesota,
MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN
(V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Wheeler Pit, WI  (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),  NM
(VI); Bayou Sorrel,  LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil  Lindsey, AR
(VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX
(VI); French Limited,  TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit  (06/26/87), TX  (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                            529

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Ground Water Monitoring (continued)

(VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Pagano
Salvage, NM (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services (09/28/90), TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX
(VI); Sol  Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street,
NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI);  United  Nuclear, NM (VI);
Aidex, IA (VII)*;  Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical,
MO (VII); Deere,  John, Dubuque Works, IA  (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville
Site Area, MO  (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,  IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO
(VII); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Northwestern States
Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz,  Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel
Paint & Wax, IA  (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service,
MO (VII); White  Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII);  Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII);  Burlington Northern (Somers),  MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver  Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway  20,  WY (VIII); Ogden
Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant
(DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal,  CO (VIII);  Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*;
Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU22), CO (VIII)*; Sand  Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler  Mountain,  CO (VIII); Union Pacific,
WY (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas  Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (Mt.  View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond  (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street,  AZ (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando  Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1,  2 & 4), CA (IX)*;
Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA  (IX); Tucson International Airport,  AZ  (IX);
Watkins  Johnson  (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Gould, OR (X); FMC Yakima Pit,
WA (X); Fort Lewis  Logistic Center, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X);
Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);  Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA
(X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)

Ground  Water Treatment

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*;
Coakley  Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste,  RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex,  MA
(I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; McKin, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);  Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME  (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              530

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Ground Water Treatment (continued)

Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Sylvester,  NH (I); Sylvester-S, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),
NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog
Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Byron Barrel &  Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell
Trucking,  NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill South Landfill,
NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott
Village Well Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ
(II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (ID; GEMS Landfill, NJ  (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ  (II); Hooker-102nd Street,
NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II);  Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield,
NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(09/30/85), NJ (II)*;  Lipari  Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine  Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim
Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Olean  Well Field, NY (II); PAS
Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rockaway  Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky
Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syncon
Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn  Manufacturing,  PR (II); Vega Alta, PR  (II);
Vestal, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Williams Property,  NJ (II); Woodland Township Route
72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill,  DE
(III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III);  Berks
Sand Pit,  PA (III); Blosenski Landfill,  PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
(III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill,  PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lord
Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA  (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA
(III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand  Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Strasburg  Landfill, PA (III);  Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA  (III)*; US Titanium, VA
(III); West Virginia Ordnance  Works, WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV);
Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV);  Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC  (IV); Carolawn,  SC (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV);  Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY  (IV); Goodrich,  B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm
Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road  Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps  Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV);
Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC
(IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);  SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV);  Sodyeco, NC (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC  (IV); Whitehouse Waste  Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Belvidere Landfill,  IL (V); Big  D
Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Clare Water Supply, MI
(V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Fisher Calo
Chem, IN  (V); FMC Corporation, MN  (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);  Galesburg/Koppers, IL
(V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill,  OH (V)*;
Janesville  Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill,  MI  (V); Kummer
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              531

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Ground Water Treatment (continued)

Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;
LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO II,
IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V);
New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Lyme,
OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (•¥)*; Novaco Industries, MI (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI
(V); Old Mill,  OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V);
Spiegelberg Landfill,  MI (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V);
Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical,
IL (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite  Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN
(V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply (09/28/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil,
IN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical,
TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva  Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control,  AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana,  TX (VI); Motco, TX
(VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa  Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88),  TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX
(VI); South Valley/Edmunds  Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001),  OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII);  Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des
Moines TCE, IA (VII); Fairfield  Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO (VII); Northwestern States Portland  Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO  (VII); Vogel
Paint & Wax,  IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Flats
Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU18), CO
(VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*;
Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX);  Indian Bend  Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA  (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant),
CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport  (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum,
CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street,  AZ (IX); Purity Oil  Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon,
CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando
Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel  Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley  (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA
(IX)*; Selma Pressure  Treating, CA (IX);  Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA  (IX)*;
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson  (Stewart
Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Fort Lewis
Logistic Center,  WA  (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*;
United Chrome, OR  (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              532

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Incineration/Thermal Destruction

Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I);
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I);
New Bedford, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage
Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm,  NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89), NJ (II)*;
Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center,
NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd  Street,
NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love
Canal, NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II);  Reich Farm, NJ (II);  Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney
Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ  (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II);
Swope Oil, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Delaware
Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical,  PA (III);
Drake Chemical  (09/29/88), PA  (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical,  VA (III);
Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (HI)*;
Ordnance Works  Disposal, WV (III);  Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Westline, PA (III);
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC
(IV); American Creosote Works,  TN (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC  (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL
(IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); SCRDI  Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Soydeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Acme
Solvents, IL (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH
(V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke),  IL (V); Fields
Brook, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN  (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V);
LaSalle Electrical  Utilities, IL (V)»; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (06/30/89), OH
(V)*; Metamora Landfill,  MI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);  Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH  (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Spiegelberg  Landfill, MI (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI  (V); St. Louis  River, MN  (V);
Summit National, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN  (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V);
Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Brio Refining, TX (VI);
Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR  (VI); Motco,  TX (VI);  Motco, TX (VI)*;
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR  (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,
TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana  Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI);
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park),  NE (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri
Electric Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex  Verona, MO (VII); Times  Beach,
MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood  Products, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO  (VIII)*; Operating
Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Western Processing,  WA (X)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             533

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Leachate Collection/Treatment

Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill (09/28/90), CT (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4,
MA (I)*;  Charles George, MA (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Picillo Farm,
RI (I); Stamina Mills,  RI (I); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ  (II); Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ  (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ  (II)*; Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*;
Volney Landfill, NY (II); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Moyer Landfill,  PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA
(III)*; Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote Works, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Dubose Oil  Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Allied/Ironton
Coke, OH  (V)*; Coshocton Landfill, OH  (V); E.H.  Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal,
MI (V)*;  Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
New Lyme, OH (V); Northside Sanitary  Landfill/Environmental Conservation and  Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel,  IL (V); Wauconda Sand
& Gravel, IL (V)*; Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Petro-Chemical  Systems, TX (VI); Vogel Paint & Wax,
IA (VII);  J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Ordot  Landfill,  GU (IX);  Martin Marietta, OR (X);  United Chrome, OR (X)

Levees

Baird &  McGuire, MA (I);  Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); American Creosote Works, TN (IV);
Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Old Inger, LA (VI) Sheridan Disposal Services,  TX (VI); Times Beach, MO
(VII)*; South Bay Asbestos Area, CA  (IX)

Offsite Discharge

Groveland  Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT  (I)*; Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);  Tinkhams
Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Byron  Barrel &  Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking,  NJ (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; GE  Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Katonah  Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield,  NY  (II)*;  Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand  & Gravel, NY (II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Reich
Farm, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); York
Oil, NY  (II); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson Road, PA  (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*;
US Titanium, VA (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape
Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL  (IV);
Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV);Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC
Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL  (V);  Hunts Disposal,
WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Old Landfill, WI  (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Long
Prairie, MN  (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Moss-American  Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval
Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN  (V); New Brighton/Arden  Hills (TCAAP),  MN (V);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Onalaska  Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St.
Louis Park), MN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN  (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Cimarron Mining, NM  (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              534

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Off site Discharge (continued)

(VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Findett, MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO  (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE (VII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville,
CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ
(IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM  Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87),
CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA  (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area
IX CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX);
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins  Johnson  (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*;
Northside Landfill, WA (X)

Offsite Disposal

Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Coakley
Landfill,  NH (I); Kearsarge  Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
McKin-IRM, ME (I); McKin, ME (I)*;  O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);  Re-Solve,
MA  (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);  American Thermostat, NY
(II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog,  NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II);  Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; D'Imperio Property, NJ (II);
Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical
Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY  (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge
Radium  (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Hooker  Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY
(II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc
Landfill,  NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill,  NJ (II)*;  Lone Pine Landfill,  NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue
Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II);  Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery
(09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West
Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II);
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Radium  Chemical, NY (II); Reich  Farm, NJ (II);
Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments,
NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill,  NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II);
Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent  Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ  (II);  Swope Oil, NJ (II);
Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vega Alta, PR (II);  Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route  72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating,  PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*;
Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon,  PA (III); C&R  Battery, VA (HI);
Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE  Spill, PA (III)*;  Delaware Sand and  Gravel, DE (III);
Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air Force Base, DE (III);
Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III);
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Hebelka Auto
Salvage Yard, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site,  PA (III);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision  Document
                                              535

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Offsite Disposal (continued)

Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM,
PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing
(06/29/90), PA (III)*; Osborne  Landfill, PA (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Saltville
Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor
Borough, PA, (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat  Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump,  FL (IV); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL  (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Miami Drum
Services, FL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV);
Palmetto  Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); SCRDI  Bluff Road, SC (IV);
SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Soydeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV);
A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V);  A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda,
OH (V); Arcanum  Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron
Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H.  Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V);
Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Johns-Manville,  IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill,  MN (V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*;
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO  I, IN (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN  (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Outboard  Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL  (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump,
WI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V); University of  Minnesota, MN (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wayne Waste  Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN  (V);  Arkwood, AR (VI);
Bayou  Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI);  Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI);
Cimarron  Mining,  NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);  Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX
(VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal  Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood  Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker
AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.  3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*;
Aidex-IRM, IA  (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Chemplex,  IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII);
Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII);
Findett, MO (VII);  Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);  Minker/Stout/Romaine
Creek, MO (VII)*;  Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Broderick  Wood Products, CO (VIII); Denver Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII);
Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla,  CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th
& Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver  Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver  Radium/Open Space, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII);
Portland  Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII);  Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO  (VIII)*;
Rocky  Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial,  CO  (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Del
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             536

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Offsite Disposal (continued)

Norte CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA
(IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson
(Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA  (X)*; Teledyne Wah Chang
Albany (TWCA), OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing,  WA (X); Western Processing
(09/25/85), WA (X)*

Offsite Treatment

Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
Laurel Park, CT (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster
Well Field, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90),  NY (II)*;
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA
Technical Center,  NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ  (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); Hooker
Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Mattiace
Petrochemicals, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II);
Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY  (II);  Sayreville Landfill, NJ  (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR
(II); Vestal Water  Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical,  NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY  (II);  Aladdin Plating, PA (III);  Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*;
Bendix, PA (HI); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig  Farm Drum, PA (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (HI); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA  (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD
(III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump,  PA (III)*; Whitmoyer  Laboratories, PA (III);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda,
OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals,  MI  (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross  Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL
(V); Hunts  Disposal, WI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI  (V);
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL  (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Tri-State
Plating, IN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises,  IN (V);  Cimarron Mining, NM (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK  (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);  South
Calvacade Street,  TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);
Fairfield Coal  Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO
(VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO  (VII); Vogel  Paint  & Wax, IA (VII);
Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*;
Commencement Bay/Tacoma,  WA (X)

Onsite Containment

Auburn Road  Landfill, NH (I)*; Coakley Landfill,  NH (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Landfill &
Resource Recovery, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             537

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Onsite Containment (continued)

W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hudson River, NY (II);  Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim
Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing,
PR (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Delaware
Sand and  Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA  (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); East Mt. Zion,
PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane &
Lombard,  MD (III); Keystone  Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);  Millcreek, PA (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA
(III);  Walsh Landfill,  PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III);
62nd Street Dump, FL (rV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Davie  Landfill, FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL  (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal,  FL (IV)*; Lewisburg
Dump, TN (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); North Hollywood  Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road
Landfill, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Yellow Water  Road, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal  Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH
(V)*; Bofors Nobel, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hagen
Farm, WI  (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash  Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V);
K&L Landfill, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI
(V); Master Disposal  Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI  (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL  (V)*; St.  Louis  River, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX  (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI);  Industrial Waste Control,  AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); South Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmonds Street, NM (VI)*; Tinker
AFB (Soldier  Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting,  TX (VI); Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas
City  Dump, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Doepke Disposal (Holliday),  KS (VII); Ellisville
Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater  Contamination (East Industrial
Park), NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA  (VII);  Northwestern States Portland
Cement, IA (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal  Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT  (VIII); Burlington Northern  (Somers),
MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta,  Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII);
Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain  Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT  (VIII);  Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA  (IX);  Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/28/90),  CA (IX)*; J.H. Baxter, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; South
Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart
Division),  CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89),  WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific  Hide and Fur,
ID (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              538

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Onsite Discharge

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; New
Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's  Salvage Yard, ME (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I)*;  Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank  Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy,
NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;
Endicott Village  Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kentucky
Avenue Wellfield,  NY (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems,  NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II);
Nascolite, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred  Plating,
NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ  (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY
(II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland  Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE
(III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA  (III); Bally  Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III)*; Cryo-Chem,  PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Fike  Chemical,  WV (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Osborne
Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*;  Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*;  US
Titanium, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; 62nd
Street Dump, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Harris/Palm
Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
(IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Zellwood, FL  (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel,  MI (V);
Clare Water Supply, MI  (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI  (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary
Landfill, MN (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Master  Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora
Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN  (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V);  Ninth  Avenue Dump, IN  (V)*;  Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V);
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical,  MI  (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical
(St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI  (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI  (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wayne Waste  Oil,  IN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Crystal Chemical,  TX (VI); Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);  Motco, TX  (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium
I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn
(09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM  (VI)*;
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);  Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Fairfield  Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO
(VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North  Farm, IA (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); White Farm Equipment  Dump, IA (VII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII);  Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin  Marietta, Denver Aerospace,
CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY  (VIII); Ogden Defense  Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky  Hats
Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain  Arsenal  (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU19), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM (San
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              539

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Onsite Discharge (continued)

Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX);
J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Fort Lewis
Logistic Center, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X)

Onsite Disposal

Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Laurel Park,  CT (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH  (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm,
NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking,  NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ  (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);  Hooker-102nd Street, NY
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow
Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);  Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Craig  Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA  (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Henderson
Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Southern Maryland Wood,  MD (III); 62nd Street  Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American
Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN  (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC
(IV); Cabot/Koppers,  FL (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood,
MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY  (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY  (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery  Disposal (03/30/90), FL  (IV)*; North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Sapp Battery,  FL (IV); SCRDI
Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill  Metal, FL (IV); Smith's  Farm, KY (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV);
Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV);  Anderson  Development,  MI (V);
Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN
(V); Fort Wayne Reduction,  IN (V); Hagen  Farm, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); LaSalle
Electrical, IL  (V); Laskin/Poplar  Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal,  MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II,
IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);  Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Springfield  Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V);
United Scrap Lead,  OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler  Pit, WI (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI);
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX  (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK  (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK
(VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX  (VI);  Petro-Chemical Systems,
TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Tenth Street
Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*;
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              540

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Onsite Disposal (continued)

Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE
(VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII);
Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sharon Steel
(Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII);  Atlas
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA
(IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX);  Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Mountain  View/Globe, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X);  FMC Yakima  Pit, WA (X); Gould, OR (X);
Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Silver Mountain  Mine, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)*

Onsite Treatment

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George  Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse  Park, MA (I); Keefe  Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I)*; New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME  (I); Old
Springfield Landfill,  VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina
Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells  G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I);
American Thermostat, NY  (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*;  Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ
(II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont  Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GE  Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Haviland  Complex, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY  (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ  (II)*; Lone Pine  Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY  (II)*;
Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon
Battery (09/30/88), NY  (II)*; Marathon Battery  (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*;
Montgomery Township  Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ
(II); Picatinny Arsenal,  NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred  Plating, NY (II); Reich
Farm, NJ  (II); Renora Inc.,  NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY
(II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply
1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick  Aerospace, NJ (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II);  Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532,
NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Avtex
Fibers, VA (III); Avtex  Fibers (09/28/90), VA (III)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Bendix,  PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA  (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*;
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (HI); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force
Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA  (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*;  L.A. Clarke & Son, VA  (III); Lord Shope Landfill,
PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III);  M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal,
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              541

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Onsite Treatment (continued)

WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III);
Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc  (09/29/90), PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand Gravel &  Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Tyson's Dump  (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US
Titanium, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American
Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC
(IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV);
City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL  (IV); Hipps  Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley
Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery,  FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery  Disposal (03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV);
Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); SCRDI  Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek),
AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Anderson  Development, MI (V); Belvidere
Landfill, IL (V); Big D  Campground, OH  (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field,
WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH  (V);  Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*;
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum
Industries, MI (V); Industrial  Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V); K&L  Landfill, MI (V);  Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities,
IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar  Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI
(V); Long Prairie, MN  (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*;
Miami County  Incinerator, OH (V);  MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN  (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton
(TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside  Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and
Chemical Corporation,  IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating,  WI (V); Onalaska  Municipal Landfill,
WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);  Outboard Marine  (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH
(V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*;
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*;
Springfield Township Dump, MI  (V); Summit National, OH (V);  U.S.  Aviex, MI  (V); United Scrap
Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol  Chemical, IL (V);  Waite Park Wells, MN
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wausau  Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply,
WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey
Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
French  Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);  Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste  Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);  Motco, TX
(VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI);  Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn  (09/23/88),  TX (VI)*; South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*;
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving,  TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
*       Subsequent Record of Decision
S       Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                             542

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Onsite Treatment (continued)

Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS
(VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,
IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination
(East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Hastings
Groundwater, NE (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest  Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm (09/27/90), IA (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA  (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO
(VII)*; Vogel  Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT
(VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin
Marietta, Denver  Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO  (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/29/90), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek,  MT  (VIII); Beckman  Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San  Jose), CA  (IX); IBM  (San Jose),
CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain  View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA
(IX); Intersil,  CA (IX); J.H.  Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield  Airport, AZ
(IX); Lorentz  Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX);  Motorola  52nd  Street, AZ (IX);
Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating
Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area  1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel  Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure
Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA  (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;
Tucson  International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert
Landfill, WA (X)  FMC Yakima Pit, WA  (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center,  WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA  (X);  Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and
Fur, ID  (X); Teledyne Wah Chang  Albany (TWCA),  OR (X)

Plume Management

Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I);
Sullivan's Ledge,  MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ  (II);
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Company, NY
(II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*;
King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II);
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Scientific  Chemical Processing,  NJ (II);
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Havertown PCP, PA  (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*;
Lord  Shope Landfill, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA  (III); Price  Landfill, NJ (III); Tyson Dump #1,
PA (III)*; Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); City Industries, FL  0V); Munisport  Landfill, FL
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             543

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Plume Management (continued)

(IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries,  MI (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*;  Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI  (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V);  Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI  (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St.
Louis Park), MN (V)*; Seymour,  IN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona
Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V)*; Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Hardage/Criner  (Amendment), OK (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*;
Sheridan Disposal  Services, TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM  (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal
Gasification Plant,  IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII);  Burlington Northern (Somers), MT
(VIII); Libby  Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Mystery Bridge  at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Rocky Hats
Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII);
Applied Materials, CA  (IX);  Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Purity
Oil Sales,  CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San  Fernando  Valley (Area 1),  CA (IX);
Stringfellow,  CA (IX)*;  Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA  (IX);  Commencement  Bay/Tacoma,
WA (X)

Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)

Beacon Heights  Landfill, CT (I);  Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well,
NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ
(II)*; Vega Alta, PR (II); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Tybouts Corner,
DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Cape Fear
Wood Preserving,  NC (IV); City  Industries, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC
(IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);  K&L Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH  (V);
Moss-American  Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V);  Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New
Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),  MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Reilly Tar &
Chemical  (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; University of
Minnesota, MN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Brio Refining,  TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM
(VI); Crystal  Chemical, TX (VI);  Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88),
TX (VI); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS  (VII); Fairfield  Coal Gasification  Plant, IA (VII);  Findett,
MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly  Groundwater Contamination, NE
(VII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Del Norte,  CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA
(IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87),  CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA  (IX)*; San
Gabriel Area 1,  CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA  (X);  Western Processing, WA (X)*
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              544

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Relocation

Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III);
Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Waste Disposal Engineering, MN
(V); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI);
Times Beach, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII);
Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX)

Solvent Extraction

Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*;
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); United Creosoting,  TX (VI)*

Slurry Wall

Sylvester, NH (I); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II);  Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lone
Pine Landfill, NJ (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ  (II); Volney Landfill,
NY (II); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Osborne  Landfill, PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V);  Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI  (V)*; Summit  National,
OH (V); Waste  Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Union Pacific,  WY  (VIII)

Soil  Washing/Flushing

Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Byron Barrel &  Drum, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; King of Prussia,  NJ (II);
Myers Property, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);  L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); US Titanium, VA (III); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI  (V);  Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)

Solidification/Stabilization

Charles George Landfill 3  & 4, MA (I)*; New Bedford, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA  (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Chemical Control,  NJ (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (ID; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Roebling Steel,  NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin
Lagoon (09/29/86), PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm  Drum, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV  (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Hebelka
Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing,  PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); 62nd  Street Dump, FL  (IV);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             545

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Solidification/Stabilization (continued)

Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics,
NC (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M
Oil), SC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV);
Pepper's Steel, FL (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL
(IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood
Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation,
MI (V); Fields Brook, OH (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Sangamo/Crab
Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA
(VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR
(VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR
(VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial  Park),
NE (VII);  Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables,  MO (VII)*; Denver
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; J.H. Baxter, CA  (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Selma  Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);  Frontier
Hard Chrome  (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Pacific Hide andFur, ID (X); Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Queen City Farms, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany  (TWCA), OR
(X);

Surface Water Diversion/Collection

Charles George,  MA  (I)*; McKin, ME (I)*; Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA  (I);
Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ  (II);  Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek,
VA (HI)*; Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva Landfill, PA  (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD
(III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Leetown  Pesticide, WV (III);  Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton  Zinc, PA
(III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Taylor Borough, PA
(III); Dubose Oil Products,  FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Disposal,  FL (IV)*; Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Industrial  Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Mid-State
Disposal,  WI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial
Waste Control, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; California
Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek,  CO  (VIII)*; Monticello  Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X)

Surface Water Monitoring

Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);  Saco
Tannery Waste Pits, ME  (I)*; Stamina Mills,  RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); BEC Trucking, NY (II); Chemical Insecticide, N} (II); Clothier Disposal,NY
(II); FAA  Technical Center, N] (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Ludlow
Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue  Dump, NJ  (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Woodland Township  Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II);
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              546

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Surface Water Monitoring (continued)

Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination,
PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);  C&R Battery, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE
(III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; New Castle  Steel DE (III); New Castle Spill, DE (HI); Palmerton Zinc, PA
(III)*; Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); North Hollywood Dump,
TN (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*;
Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;
Johns-Manville, IL  (V); K&L Landfill,  MI (V); Master Disposal  Service Landfill, WI (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN  (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI  (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI  (V); Peterson Sand & Gravel, IL (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; United Scrap Lead,
OH (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*;  Wayne Waste Oil, IN  (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Sand
Springs, OK (VI)*;  Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Fulbright/Sac  River Landfill, MO (VII);
Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE),
UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT  (VIII); Whitewood  Creek, SD (VIII); Coalinga Asbestos Mine,  CA
(IX)*; J.H.  Baxter, CA (IX); Gould, OR (X)

Surface Water Treatment

C&R Battery, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA  (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*;  Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); East Helena,  MT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII)

Temporary Storage

New Bedford, MA (I); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ  (II);
Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer,  NY  (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals,  NJ (II); Picatinny
Arsenal, NJ  (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA
(III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Brown  Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV); Sangamo/Crab Orchard  NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers
Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII); Minker Stout/Stout, MO (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII);
Times  Beach, MO (VII)*;  Weldon  Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium 12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Open Space Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*;  Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust  #2 &
#3), UT (VIII); Rocky Hats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*;
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             547

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Treatment Technology

Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I);
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge
Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs,  MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes,  NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Stamina Mills,  RI  (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),  NH  (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat,  NY (II)*; Brewster  Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well
Field (09/29/88), NY (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ  (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*;  Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Ewan
Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical
Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ
(II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ  (II)*;  Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY
(II)*; Love Canal, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon  Battery (09/30/88), NY  (II)*;
Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals,  NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ
(II); Montgomery Township  Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers  Property, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II);  Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred  Plating, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Renora  Inc., NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm,  NY (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent  Savers, NY (II); Syncon  Resins, NJ
(II); Upjohn Manufacturing,  PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles,  PA (III);
Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Avtex Fibers  (09/28/90), VA (III)*; Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);
Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm  Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical,  PA (III)*;  Fike Chemical, WV
(III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*;  L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA  (III); M.W.
Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV
(III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (HI)*; Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; US
Titanium, VA (III);  West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories,  PA  (III);
62nd Street  Dump, FL (IV);  Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); American Creosote Works,
TN (IV); American Creosote Works (01/05/89), FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown  Wood
Preserving, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV);  Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Celanese Fibers  Operations, NC (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Geiger
(C&M Oil),  SC (rV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes,  NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal,  FL (IV)*; Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS  (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC  (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV);  Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water
Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment),  FL (IV);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;  Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V);
Arrowhead  Refinery, MN (V); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              548

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Treatment Technology (continued)

Nobel, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste, MI
(V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Ionia City
Landfill,  MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities,  IL
(V)*; Laskin/Poplar, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid  Disposal, MI (V);
Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI
(V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),  MN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Outboard Marine (Amendment),  IL (V); Pristine,  OH (V);  Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI
(V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S.  Aviex, MI  (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of
Minnesota, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises,
IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French  Limited, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street,
TX (VI);  Oil Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,
TX (VI);  Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds
Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*;  Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK  (VI);  Texarkana
Wood Preserving, TX  (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United  Creosoting, TX
(VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA  (VII);
Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park),  NE
(VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables,
MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII);
Waverly  Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington
Northern (Somers),  MT (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin
Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Ogden Defense
Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand
Creek Industrial  (09/28/90), CO  (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt.
View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose),  CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX);  Intel
(Mountain View), CA  (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H.  Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel  & Drum,  CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street,  AZ (IX);
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
Purity Oil Sales,  CA (IX); Raytheon, CA  (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel
Valley (Areas 1,  2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA  (IX);
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International  Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins  Johnson (Stewart Division), CA  (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement  Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X);  Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA  (X); Gould,  OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);
Teledyne Wah Chang  Albany (TWCA), OR (X); Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United  Chrome, OR
(X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                             549

-------
TECHNOLOGY

Vacuum Extraction

Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH  (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
(I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI  (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),
NH (I); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Solvent  Savers, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Bendix, PA  (III);
Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes,  NC (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen
Farm, WI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI  (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment),
OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); Springfield Township  Dump, MI (V); Verona  Well Field, MI (V)*;
Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.  3001), OK  (VI); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado  Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,  NE  (VII)*;
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Martin Marietta,
Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*;  Sand Creek Industrial,
CO (VIII); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ  (IX); Solvent
Service, CA (IX); Watkins  Johnson (Stewart Division), CA  (IX)

Venting

Beacon Heights, CT (I);  Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles  George, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill,
NH (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Kentucky
Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Port Washington Landfill, NY (II);  Syosset Landfill, NY (II);  East Mt.
Zion, PA (III); Heleva Landfill,  PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);  Allied/Ironton Coke, OH
(V)*; IMC Terre Haute,  IN (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Long Prairie,  MN (V); Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; New Lyme,
OH (V); Onalaska Municipal  Landfill, WI  (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit,  WI (V);
Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK  (VI), Operating  Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Martin  Marietta, OR (X)

Volatilization/Soil Aeration

Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V);  Fairchild Semicond  (Mt. View), CA  (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S  San
Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain  View), CA (IX); Raytheon, CA  (IX)

Vitrification

Anderson Development, MI (V); Ionia City Landfill,  MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), IL (V)*; Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Rocky Mountain  Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*;
Northwest Transformer, WA  (X)
 *       Subsequent Record of Decision
 S       Supplemental Record of Decision
 EDD    Enforcement Decision Document
                                              550

-------
MISCELLANEOUS

Municipally-Owned Site

Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); North Sea Municipal Landfill,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II);
Volney Landfill, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Ionia City  Landfill, MI (V); New
Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Crystal City  Airport,
TX (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); John's Sludge Pond, KS (VII); Denver Radium Site
Streets, CO (VIII), Ordot Landfill, GU (IX)

Woodlands (FY 1982 - 1988 only)

Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III);  Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Old Inger,  LA (VI)

HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT

ACL

Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME  (I)*; Sylvester, NH (I);  Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon,  CT (I); Bog  Creek Farm, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Marathon  Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Blosenski  Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III);  Henderson Road, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV  (III)*;
Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC  (IV); Byron  Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V);  Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Velsicol  Chemical, IL (V); Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Western Processing,
WA (X)*

Background Levels

Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I);  Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II);  Montclair/West
Orange Radium, NJ (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Woodland  Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Croydon TCE  Spill, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Industrial Lane, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA  (III)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Raymark, PA  (III); Sand,
Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Aberdeen  Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV);
Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV);
Metamora Landfill,  MI (V)*; Reilly Tar,  MN (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); United Scrap
Lead, OH (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM
(VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East  Industrial Park),  NE (VII);
Anaconda Smelter/Mill  Creek, MT (VIII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                              551

-------
HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT

Deferred Decision

Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II);
Douglassville Disposal, PA  (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's
Dump, PA (III);  American Cresote, FL (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN (V)*; Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma
Channel-Well 12A, WA  (X)*

Initial Remedial Measure (IRM)

New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Intel (Santa Clara III),  CA  (IX)

Temporary Remedial Measure (FY 1982 - 1988 only)

Hudson River, NY (II); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (VI)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII); Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Union Pacific, WY (VIII)

Contingent Remedy

Saco Tannery Waste  Pits, ME (I)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Imperial Oil/Champion
Chemicals, NJ (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Myers Property, NJ  (II); Preferred Plating, NY
(II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); City Industries, FL (IV); Howe  Valley Landfill,  KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); St.  Louis River, MN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); East
Helena, MT (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
*      Subsequent Record of Decision
S      Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD   Enforcement Decision Document
                                                  * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1991. 5 » 8. 1 6 7 t o 5 S 3
                                             552

-------
-------
>
tn "2 •"
1 ™U
ill




ja
8
o
0.
3
I
U





Components of
Selected Remedy
( HI
1
I
OJ
ns
*

.0)
.Q
1
^
§
S
•& s
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Dati
Remedial Actk
c
o
'So
OJ
Btf
,
0 0
o o
0 0 «
°" °" S 'P
£ SJ H H
CO CO OJ C
5 S & i
irt _ ra
r>4 T3 j_.
« .c -S - o
e8 "S u -e Si -=
u — ^o > QJ &o
o f .£?!: ^ ^

^^ fol^
Itllll
JH ^ ^- ro ^J "C ,->
n= -° w S ^ w S


aj \ *3 02 ^' *"" —
f |gy fa S a
r* C CO CXi r-H d yl
o 5 ^

Excavation of soil followed by screening to
separate large contaminated materials and
stabilization fixation of a portion of the soi
using an immobilization technique; construi
of a bottom clay liner, where necessary; an
capping of the stabilized material along wit
any remaining contaminated materials; rem
of some GW monitoring wells; GW monitor
and deed and access restrictions. Onsite
consolidation will be implemented if pilot
testing finds treatment impracticable


\
§
IN
CO"
_c
'5
a
CO
_c
2
§
" «
:= S3
&£
•* £
CO "0
-S S
5 | § S
o Q H ;> E
S " 3 S .
a ts -a •> «
W 3 ^ ^ 
j_r
OJ
8 *
S >
•a o _.
§^ ^ 1
ft > 0 S


o


S
^
o
^ Gf O —
Ov 18 O ™
*"•§ ° e
" §" Sf e
g 3 g ^M
.,1
ie a
«Sa
•£ o ra
Ipi
l-o3"S
^502
l"§ u ^
1 e^^
QJ t f/5
u c ja n
dJ O QJ *•"*
^ El o
C ®^ i
Si ja 'i
Continued operation of H1-H2 treatment
system; installation of variable-frequency
controllers on well pump motors to reduce
energy requirements; changing of fan drive
treatment tower; installation of new monitc
wells, upgrading of existing wells, and
continued sampling and analysis of aquifer;
excavation and offsite disposal of septic tan
and drain field piping; and placement of
administrative restrictions on excavation of
and installation and usage of wells

"8
IS
1
VI
O
Z
ta
*Z
5 M
s C ^
° g-i
•g 1 -s S
18 ^ CA £X
u 8 > i
tf
u
! „
12 5J
u o
"O m
C < \ T3
o >  O ft .E 18
i
u £
c ^
8J S
a5 2 S


0


442