EPA/540/8-91/067
Publication 9355.6-04
July 1991
ROD ANNUAL REPORT
FY 1990
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
{Sp Printed on Recycled Paper
U S. Erttawnert.^^
ffitt'JSw.-.'.', i..
Chicago, IL 60604-StoJ
-------
NOTICE
The policies and procedures set forth here are intended as guidance to Agency and other
government employees. They do not constitute rulemaking by the Agency, and may not be relied
on to create a substantive or procedural right enforceable by any other person. The Government
may take action that is at variance with the policies and procedures in this manual.
-------
CONTENTS
Sections Page
I. Introduction 1
II. Records Of Decision Abstracts 65
III. Records Of Decision Summary Table: FY 1990 209
IV. Records Of Decision Summary Table: FY 1982-1989 285
V. Records Of Decision Keyword List: FY 1982-1990 445
-------
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
FY 1990 marks the fourth year since the
passage of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), which
amended the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA). During this period, the
remedial program has modified its approach in
site cleanups to reflect mandates in CERCLA,
as amended by SARA; for example. Section 121
of CERCLA mandates the selection of a
remedial action that is protective of human
health and the environment, complies with
applicable or relevant and appropriate Federal
and State requirements (ARARs), is
cost-effective, and utilizes permanent solutions
and alternative treatment technologies or
resource recovery technologies to the maximum
extent practicable. In addition, CERCLA
includes a preference for remedies that employ
treatment that permanently and significantly
reduce the volume, toxicity, or mobility of
hazardous wastes as a principal element, and
requires an explanation in those cases in which
the selected remedy does not satisfy this
preference. The Records of Decision (RODs)
listed in this annual report document
compliance with these mandates for the
remedial program in FY 1990. All of the FY
1990 RODs were approved at the Regional
level, which is consistent with the policy
initiated in FY 1986 to delegate ROD approval
authority to the Regions.
FY 1990 RODs
One hundred sixty-one (161) RODs and seven
(7) ROD Amendments, including Fund-lead,
Enforcement, and Federal Facility RODs were
signed during FY 1990. The data in this ROD
Annual Report are based on these 168 RODs
and ROD Amendments; for clarity, however,
these are collectively referred to as RODs
throughout the remainder of the report. Sixty
(60) of the FY 1990 RODs addressed source
control only, and thirty-four (34) RODs
addressed ground water remediation only.
Sixty-five (65) RODs selected both source
control and ground water remediation
components, and the remaining nine (9) RODs
were no action/no further action (see Exhibit
1). Of the total 125 source control RODs, 106
addressed a final remedy, and the remaining 19
addressed an interim remedy. Of the total 34
ground water only RODs, 27 addressed a final
remedy, and 7 addressed an interim remedy for
the site.
In keeping with CERCLA Section 121 and the
National Contingency Plan (NCP) program
expectations to treat highly toxic, highly mobile
wastes and contain low level wastes or large
volumes of waste, source control treatment was
selected in 88 of the 106 final source control
RODs (see Exhibit 1). Also in keeping with
NCP program expectations, ground water
should be returned to its beneficial uses within
a reasonable time frame, when practicable.
This expectation has been evidenced by the
selection of active ground water restoration, in
addition to a source control remedy, in 59
RODs; and selection of active ground water
restoration in 32 RODs where source control
was not being addressed.
Exhibits 1 through 14 summarize various data
from the 168 FY 1990 RODs. Exhibit 1
provides an overview of the types of remedial
action selected for all FY 1990 RODs. This
Exhibit reflects FY 1990 ROD compliance with
the CERCLA mandate to utilize permanent
solutions. Exhibit 2 provides a quantitative
summary of remedial action components by the
number of occurrences in RODs. This exhibit
demonstrates that occurrences of the use of
treatment technologies (109) in selected source
control remedies exceeded that of containment
only remedy occurrences (35) by a factor of
three. Furthermore, the number of
occurrences of ground water treatment was 192
compared with 26 occurrences of nontreatment
remedies. Of the 109 occurrences of source
control treatment technologies, thermal
destruction/incineration treatment was selected
most frequently (28 occurrences) with 2 RODs
using two types of thermal treatment, followed
by immobilization (24 occurrences), and In-situ
(19 occurrences). In-situ vitrification was also
selected as treatment (4 occurrences), which
represents an increase in the use of this
treatment technology in the remedial program
compared to previous fiscal years. Exhibit 3
compares the number of source control RODs
employing 'containment' as a primary
component of the remedy with RODs
employing 'treatment' as a principal
component. Exhibit 4 illustrates the
-------
occurrences of treatment technologies in FY
1990 source control remedies by treatment
category. Separation/recovery was the main
treatment technology category (33% of total
source control remedies), followed closely by
destruction/detoxification technologies (32%).
Immobilization was employed as a source
control treatment in 22% of the remedies. The
remaining 13% of technology occurrences were
unspecified treatment technologies (9%), or
in-situ vitrification (4%). Of the 109 treatment
technologies selected, 96 were selected in final
source control RODs, while 13 were selected in
interim source control RODs.
Exhibit 5 shows the total number of treatment
occurrences (192) for ground water remedies in
FY 1990 RODs. The majority of ground water
treatment occurrences (79%) were
physical/chemical treatment technologies
including air stripping (46), carbon adsorption
(28), and precipitation (19). Biological
treatment was employed in 4% of the
treatments. Two categories comprised the
remaining 17%: unspecified or to be determined
treatment technologies (9%), and treatment at a
publicly owned treatment works (POTW)
facility (8%).
An index of site remedies for FY 1990 is
provided in Exhibit 6, which contains RODs
grouped by the specific type of source control
and/or non-source control remedy selected. To
assist in understanding the technology data
presented in Exhibits 1 through 6, a description
of each source control and ground water
treatment category is provided in Exhibit 7.
Historical Overview FY 1982-1990
The passage of SARA strengthened and
extended the Superfund program while
maintaining the overall framework for
implementation. New requirements under
CERCLA, as amended by SARA, were intended
to ensure protective cleanup standards,
permanent remedies, and the use of alternative
technologies, where applicable. A historical
overview of FY 1982-1990 RODs is provided in
Exhibits 8 through 12 to show annual progress
in achieving statutory mandates. This overview
includes data collected for the FY 1990 RODs
in Exhibits 1 through 6. Exhibit 8 depicts the
number of RODs signed per fiscal year, which
demonstrates that there has been a marked
increase in the number of RODs signed since
the enactment of SARA (October 17, 1986).
Exhibit 9 is a quantitative overview of the
occurrences and type of treatment technologies
which have been selected in source control
RODs. An index of the ROD sites where these
treatment technologies were selected is
provided in Exhibits 10 and 11.
Comparative data on the number of RODS and
number of occurrences of treatment
technologies selected for source control
remedies in post-SARA RODs (FY 1987-1990)
are presented in Exhibit 12. These data
demonstrate that, in accordance with SARA,
there has been: (1) an increase in the
percentage of RODs selecting treatment as a
principal element of source control, and (2) an
increase in the percentage of innovative
treatment technologies selected (see Exhibit 9).
Exhibit 13 provides a comparison of FY
1982-1990 ROD data on remedial action costs.
Exhibits 14 and 15 show and list the
information for FY 1990 treatment train RODs,
i.e. RODs which employ a sequence of
treatment technologies to a single medium or
constituent.
During FY 1990, EPA initiated a comprehensive
effort between several offices to achieve
consistency of historical ROD data with respect
to current definitions of treatment technologies,
and interim and final remedial action
categories. The results of this effort are
evidenced in this report, and in the Exhibit 7
descriptions of treatment categories.
FY 1990 ROD Annual Report Sections
The FY 1990 ROD Annual Report is designed
to provide the Regions, Headquarters, and the
public with summary information on FY 1990
RODs and historical information on FY
1982-1990 RODs. The report should be used as
a reference document. To ensure ease of
reference, the material in this report is divided
into the following sections:
• Introduction - highlights
accomplishments in the remedial
program, and compliance with CERCLA
and the NCP.
• FY 1990 ROD Abstracts - describes site
conditions, key contaminants, selected
remedial actions, specific performance
standards and goals for key
contaminants, institutional controls,
-------
remedial action costs, operation
and maintenance costs, and
site-specific keywords for each
FY 1990 ROD.
• FY 1990 ROD Summary Table -
provides the remedial action number
(e.g., 1st, 2nd, etc.), and summarizes
the contaminants by media, estimated
waste volume, major components of
the selected remedy, cleanup goals for
key contaminants, present worth or
capital costs, and operation and
maintenance costs for each FY 1990
ROD.
• FY 1982-1989 ROD Summary Table -
provides the remedial action location
and date, and summarizes the
contaminants by media, estimated
waste volume, major components of
the selected remedy, cleanup goals for
key contaminants, present worth or
capital costs, and operation and
maintenance costs for each FY
1982-1989 ROD.
• ROD Keyword List - provides a
summary listing under each keyword
of all RODs that have an association
with the keyword based on the
selected remedial action. A keyword
list index is located at the beginning of
the section.
-------
A
«T
OC
HI
5
Wf
" 0
2
DC
§
OC
\\ti\\
II
U T9 0) »-
-------
Exhibit 2
FY 1990 ROD REMEDIAL ACTION SUMMARY TABLE a
-------
CO
X
UJ
UJ
Q
UJ
S
UJ
cc
o
or
O
O
UJ
o
cc
r>
o
CO
o
o>
O)
T-
U.
C
>
O
UJ
111
cc
^J
o
1
0
0
LLJ
o
QC
O
1-
z
UJ
o
cc
111
Q.
U.
O
NUMBER
RODs
£
CO
c
^
mary compc
a.
ra
TO
IS
I
c
c
o
o
v°
b
CM
R
in
CO
o>
TO
CO
TO
TO
1
*O
C
CO
I
js
8
c
TO
1
O
Q-
8
O-
'o
c
Q.
TO
TO
C
0)
E
•«^
^
^o
CM
CO
CM
to
"co
1
2
"o
c
cr
c
'TO
8
a>
'(/)
!g
i3
hout onsite
o
.c
5 c
i. o
£ 1
E ™
to co
0) £
l± o
v? 'ip
O" 0s
§ w
O CM
^o
O
T—
»
-------
Ul*
uj
(/)
Ul
§~
TREATMENT TECHNOL
^
Ul
u
oc
SI
CO
Separation/Recovery (31
i
s?
8
O)
c
.0
T5
S
w
LU
1—
2
In-situ Vacuum/Soil Vaf
Soil Washing (8)
Thermal Desorption (6)
Soil Flushing (2)
•^~^
Volatilization/Aeration (
oo"
Ci
c.
-^ .Q
H/ ^S
£2. ™
c S
o •?;
Destruction/Detoxificati
Thermal Destruction/Inc
1
3?
CM
CO
Bioremediation (5)
Dechlorination (2)
Immobilization (24)
Stabilization (8)
§
go
CM
CM
*— -.
^
^>
c
Solid if ication/Stabilizatio
Sorbent Solidification (5]
j-f.
c
c
c
Other/Unspecified Treat
D
«
o"
^/r
0)
o"
"o
c
-C
o
0)
1—
Technologies (14)
Unspecified Treatment
S?
§
In-srtu Vitrification (4)
*r
*•>
'5
!E
x
in
Ji-D
Oo
wen
UJo
O<3>
O
O
£2
-------
O>Q
ZCC
to
8
C
£
I
0
o>
.0
E
3
Technology
(O CO
Air Stripping
> Carbon Adsorption
* HN
1 18
o
O> CO
> Precipitation
> Granular Activated
Carbon
91
o> r-
» Filtration
> Ion Exchange
m
Sedimentation
> UV Peroxidation
) Chemical Treatment
in
CO CO
> Flocculation
' Activated Alumina
01
CM CM CM
' Aeration
* Incineration
> pH Adjustment
iwu
T- J—
* Neutralization
> Reverse Osmosis
^ ti
11
CO
:al
> Biological Treatment
f ©
5
^
> Ex-Situ Bioremediation
®
oo in
^ ^
> Other/Unspecified
Treatment Technologies
> POTW
| 0 0
6
n>
CM
O>
"~
|
2II
x
UJ
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
TECHNOLOGIES*1 REGION
Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
Immobilization (24)
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
10
1
2
3
3
SITE NAME. STATE
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NHa
New Bedford, MAa
FAA Technical Center, NJ
Hooker 102nd Street, NY
Hooker Chemical-Ruco
Polymer, NJ
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY
Sayreville Landfill, NJ
Sealand Restoration, NY
Greenwood Chemical, VAa
M.W. Manufacturing, PAa
Bofors Nobel, Mlb
Fisher Calo Chem, INa
Pristine (Amendment), OHa
St. Louis River, MN
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
OKa-c
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,
ARa
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
ARa
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX
Vertac, AR
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,
IAC
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial
Park), NEa
Missouri Electric Works, MO
Shenandoah Stables, MOa
Ogden Defense Depot, UT
Sand Creek Industrial, COa
FMC Yakima Pit, WA
New Bedford, MAa
Roebling Steel, NJa
C&R Battery, VA
Greenwood Chemical, VAa
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
" ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES3 REGION
Immobilization (24)
(Continued)
In-situ Vacuum/Vapor
Extraction (19)
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
4
5
SITE NAME. STATE
M.W. Manufacturing, PAa
62nd Street Dump, FL
Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Cole man-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FLa
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Disposal, FL
Schuylkill Metal, FL
Yellow Water Road, FL
Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment),
FL
Oconomowoc Electroplating, Wl
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), ILa
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,
ARa
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
ARa
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial
Park), NEa
Shenandoah Stables, MOa
Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, COa
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU17),CO
J.H. Baxter, CAa
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany
(TWCA),OR
Stamina Mills, Rl
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY
Lord Shope Landfill, PA
Jadco-Hughes, NCa
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
Fisher Calo Chem, INa
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
10
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES^ REGION
In-situ Vacuum/Vapor
Extraction (19)
(Continued)
Other/Unspecified
Treatment Technologies
(10)
Soil Washing (8)
5
5
5
5
6
7
7
9
9
9
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
6
6
2
2
4
4
5
5
SITE NAME. STATE
Hagen Farm, Wl
Pristine (Amendment), OHa
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
OKa'c
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
3001), OK
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE
Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, COa
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18), CO
Intersil, CAa
Solvent Service, CAC
Watkins-Johnson, CA
Kearsarge, NHa
Mattiace Petrochemical, NY
Radium Chemical, NY
Roebling Steel, NJa
Sarney Farm, NYa
Solvent Savers, NY
Avtex Fibers, VA
Jacksonville, ARa
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
ARa
Intersil, CAa
King of Prussia, NJ
Myers Property, NJa
Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FLa
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
Wla
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
11
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES* REGION
Soil Washing (8)
(Continued)
Thermal Desorptlon (6)
Bioremediation (5)
In-SItu Vitrification (4)
Dechlorination (2)
Soil Flushing (2)
Volatilization/ Aeration (1)
OTHER TREATMENT (30)
6
8
2
2
2
5
5
8
4
5
5
9
5
5
6
8
2
4
3
3
1
2
2
2
SITE NAME. STATE
Arkwood, AR
Sand Creek Industrial, COa
American Thermostat, NY
Claremont Polychemical, NY
Sarney Farm, NYa
Bofors Nobel, Mlb-c
University of Minnesota, MN
Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, C0a>b
Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Dubose Oil Products, FL
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
Wla
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl
J.H. Baxter, CAa
Anderson Development, Ml
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), ILa
Crystal Chemical, TX
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU16),CO
Myers Property, NJa
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK
US Titanium, VA
Jadco-Hughes, NCa
Howe Valley Landfill, KY
Coakley Landfill, NH
American Thermostat, NY*
Claremont Polychemical, NY*
Hooker-102nd Street, NY*
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
D ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
12
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES* REGION
OTHER TREATMENT (30)
(Continued)
CONTAINMENT ONLY
Onsite (30)
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
8
6
6
8
8
1
2
SITE NAME. STATE
Myers Property, NJ*
Radium Chemical, NY*
Robeling Steel, NJ
Avtex Fibers, VA*
Brown's Battery Breaking, PA*
C&R Battery, VA*
Dover Air Force Base, DE
Fike Chemical, WV
Schuylkill Metal, FL*
Algoma Municipal Landfill, Wl*
Anderson Development, Ml*
Bofors Nobel, Ml*
Hunts Disposal, Wl*
Janesville Old Landfill, Wl*
Metamora Landfill, Ml*
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, Wl*
NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt,
IL
St, Louis River, MN*
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK*
East Helena, MT
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR*
Rogers Road Landfill, AR*
Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16),
CO*
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
CO*
Operating Industries Landfill
(Amendment), CA*
Old Springfield Landfill, VT
Scientific Chemical Processing,
NJ
Syosset Landfill, NY
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
13
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES^ REGION
CONTAINMENT
(Continued)
ONLY
Onsite (30)
(Continued)
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
10
SITE NAME. STATE
Coker's Sanitation Service
Landfills, DE
East Mt. Zion, PA
Hranica Landfill, PA
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA
Osborne Landfill, PA
Walsh Landfill, PA
Bypass 601 Groundwater
Contamination, NCd
Lewisburg Dump, TN
North Hollywood Dump, TNd
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL
Janesville Ash Beds, Wl
K&L Landfill, Ml
Master Disposal Service Landfill,
Wl
Wheeler Pit, Wl
Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA
Northwestern States Portland
Cement, IA
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/
Pits (USDOE), MO
Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
White Farm Equipment Dump, IA
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 &
#3), UTd
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU20), CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU23), CO
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings),
UT
Silver Bow Creek, MT
Whitewood Creek, SDd
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
Silver Mountain Mine, WA
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
14
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES^ REGION
CONTAINMENT ONLY
(Continued)
Offsite (9)
OTHER ACTIONS (2)
(Institutional
Controls, Relocation)
NON-SOURCE CONTROL
Pump and Treatment
in Addition to a Source
Control Remedy (59)
2
2
2
2
2
4
8
2
10
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
" ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
SITE NAME. STATE
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ
Imperial Oil/Champion
Chemicals, NJ
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ
Woodland Township Route
532, NJ
Bypass 601 Groundwater
Contamination, NCd
North Hollywood Dump, TNd
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 &
#3), UTd
Whitewood Creek, SDd
Forest Glen Subdivision, NY
Louisiana-Pacific, CA
Coakley Landfill, NH
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH
Old Springfield, VT
Stamina Mills, Rl
American Thermostat, NY
Claremont Polychemical, NY
FAA Technical Center, NJ
Hooker-102nd Street, NY
King of Prussia, NJ
Myers Property, NJa
Scientific Chemical Processing,
NJ
Solvent Savers, NY
Woodland Township
Route 72, NJ
Woodland Township
Route 532, NJ
15
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES3 REGION
NON-SOURCE
(Continued)
CONTOL
Pump and Treatment
in Addition to a Source
Control Remedy (59)
(Continued)
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
SITE NAME. STATE
Keystone Sanitation,
PA
Lord Shope Landfill, PA
Osborne Landfill, PA
US Titanium, VA
62nd Street Dump, FL
Cabot/Koppers, FLa
Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FLa
Jadco-Hughes, NCa
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
Schuylkill Metal, FL
Bofors Nobel, Mlc
Fisher Calo Chem, IN
Hunts Disposal, Wl
Janesville Ash Beds, Wl
Janesville Old Landfill,
Wl
K&L Landfill, Ml
Metamora Landfill, Ml
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
Wla
Oconomowoc Electroplating, Wl
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl
Pristine (Amendment), OHa
Springfield Township Dump, Mla
University of Minnesota, MN
Wayne Waste Oil, INa
Crystal Chemical, TX
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
OKa-c
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
3001) OK
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,
IAC
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
16
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION
SITE NAME. STATE
NON-SOURCE
(Continued)
CONTROL
Pump and Treatment
in Addition to a Source
Control Remedy (59)
(Continued)
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA
Missouri Electric Works, MO
Northwestern States Portland
Cement, IA
Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE
White Farm Equipment Dump, IA
Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, COa
Ogden Defense Depot, UT
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU17),CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18), CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU20), CO
Silver Bow Creek, MT
Intersil, CAa
J.H. Baxter, CAa
Solvent Service, CAa
Watkins-Johnson, CA
Pump and Treatment
Only (32) (Continued)
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
Cinnaminson Groundwater
Contamination, NJ
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NYC
Lone Pine Landfill, NJ
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ
Army Creek Landfill, DE
Croydon TCE Spill, PA
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
k ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
^ ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
17
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES3 REGION
NON-SOURCE
(Continued)
CONTROL
Pump and Treatment
Only (32) (Continued)
OTHER GROUND WATER REMEDIES
ALTERNATE WATER SUPPLY (6)
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
2
3
3
4
5
10
SITE NAME. STATE
Cryo-Chem, PA
Raymark, PA
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD
Tyson Dump #1, PA
City Industries, FL
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL
Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL
Munisport Landfill, FL
Clare Water Supply, Mlc
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN
Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant, MN
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, Ml
Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis
Park), MN
Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml
Tri-State Plating, IN
Cimarron Mining, NM
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WYC
Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU19),CO
Applied Materials, CA
Intel (Santa Clara III), CA
Solvent Service, CAC
Stringfellow, CA
Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA
Higgins Farm, NJ
Butz Landfill, PA
Walsh Landfill, PA
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL
National Presto Industries, Wl
Silver Mountain Mine, WA
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
" ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
^ ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
18
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES^ REGION
SITE NAME. STATE
NATURAL ATTENUATION (6)
GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT
Management of Migration
in Addition to a Source
Control and/or Pump and
Treatment Remedy (4)
NO ACTION/NO FURTHER
ACTION (9)
2
3
4
4
2
5
5
5
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sarney Farm, NY
East Mt. Zion, PA
Arkwood, AR
Hardage/Criner (Amendment),
OKa-c
Faiilield Coal Gasification Plant,
IAC
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20,
WYC
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NYC
Bofors Nobel, Mlc
Clare Water Supply, Mlb-c
Master Disposal Service Landfill,
Wl
Baird & McGuire, MA
M&T DeLisa Landfill, NJ
Pomona Oaks Well
Contamination, NJ
Westline (Amendment), PA
National Starch & Chemical, NC
Union Scrap Iron Metal, MN
Pagano Salvage, NM
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (FAR-MAR-
CO), NE
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU22), CO
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
b ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
" ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
19
-------
Exhibit 6
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1990
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGIES^ REGION SITE NAME. STATE
OTHER ACTIONS (1)
Institutional Controls 9 Louisiana-Pacific, CA
Includes treatment component.
a ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
D ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
c ROD selected two non-source control measures.
d ROD selected onsite and offsite containment remedies.
20
-------
Exhibit 7
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
SOURCE CONTROL AND GROUND WATER
Source Technologies:
Treatment technology for source material are grouped based on the primary functions for which
they are generally used: destruction/detoxification, separation/recovery, immobilization, and
other. The specific technologies listed are those identified in the RODs.
I. DESTRUCTION/DETOXIFICATION
A. Bloremedlatlon
Biological treatments use microorganisms to degrade primarily low to moderate levels of
organic contaminants in aqueous waste streams and soil. Biological treatments include:
* ln-$Jtu. piprQrnedjptlon - uses natural populations or seeded bacteria to
biodegrade organic compounds. The biological process may be
accelerated by Introducing nutrients and oxygen. This process is often
used in conjunction with a ground water pumping and reinjection system
to circulate nutrients and oxygen through a contaminated aquifer and
associated contaminated soil.
• Solkj/glurry phase BioremQdlfltion - involves commingling excavated
organic-contaminated soil and sludge with bioactive microorganisms in a
mobile batch reactor or an in-ground reactor. Waste is mixed with water to
create a slurry composition, and the slurry is mixed to maximize treatment
of organic contaminants. Upon completion of the process, the slurry is
dewatered and the treated soil is disposed of.
B. Chemical Destruction/Detoxification
Chemical destruction/detoxification processes alter the hazardous substances to
produce a by-product residue that is less hazardous than the original waste and may be
easier to remove from the waste stream. Chemical destruction/detoxification processes
include:
Reduction/Oxidation fredox) - a destructive process that
changes the chemical nature of the nature of the contaminants.
• QechJprJna.tJpn • Is a destruction process in which chlorine is chemically
removed from chlorinated organic compounds. This process converts
the more toxic compounds into less toxic, more water soluble products.
The transformation of contaminants within the soil produces compounds
that are more readily removed from the soil.
C. Thermal Treatment
Thermal treatments use heat to destroy or detoxify hazardous substances,
encompassing such technologies as Incineration, pyrolysis, and wet air oxidation.
Specific incineration types include rotary Kiln, liquid injection, fluidized-bed, and infrared
treatment.
21
-------
Exhibit 7
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
SOURCE CONTROL AND GROUND WATER
(Continued)
Incineration - is a controlled flame combustion process in which organics are
destroyed producing carbon dioxide, water, and other compounds.
Pyrolysis - is a decomposition process in which organics are thermally
decomposed into their individual elements, in an oxygen deficient atmosphere.
Wet Air Oxidation - is a process that involves adding high pressure and
temperature to a water solution or suspension to destroy organics.
II. SEPARATION/RECOVERY
A. Chemical/Physical Extraction
Chemical/Physical Extraction is a transfer/separation process in which contaminants are
dissociated from the matrix either through a chemical or a physical process and are
dissolved in a liquid or gaseous phase which may require further treatment.
Chemical/physical extraction processes include:
In-Situ Soil Flushing - is an in-situ extraction process that uses a flushing
agent, e.g., water to extract contaminants.
In-Situ Vacuum/Soil Vapor Extraction - is an in-situ process that involves
extraction of VOCs from soil using a vacuum or forced air. This process is
generally used with other technologies since it transfers contaminants
from the soil to air and water waste streams.
Soil Washing - is a physical/chemical separation technology in which
excavated soil is washed with fluids to remove contaminants. Soil
washing is generally followed by other technologies in a treatment train.
B. Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption uses heat to extract volatile organics from the matrix and may be
followed by other treatments to collect and/or destroy contaminants. Thermal desorption
processes include:
Ex-Situ Thermal Desorption - is a physical transfer process that uses air, heat, and
mechanical agitation to change volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soil into a
gas stream, where the contaminants are then further treated.
In-situ Stream Stripping/Hot Air Stripping - involves the injection of steam or hot
air into soil to volatilize VOCs. As VOCs rise to the surface they are condensed or
trapped on activated carbon.
22
-------
Exhibit 7
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
SOURCE CONTROL AND GROUND WATER
(Continued)
III. IMMOBILIZATION
Immobilization
The term "immobilization" is used to mean any of the technologies which limit the
solubility or mobility of contaminants. The term "fixation" has also been used as a
synonym for immobilization. Technology types which fall within the realm of
immobilization include:
Stabilization - involves the addition and mixing of materials that limit the
solubility or mobility of the waste constituents even though the physical
characteristics of the waste may not be changed.
Solidification/Stabilization - involves the addition and mixing of materials
that limit the solubility or mobility of the waste constituents, and results in
a monolithic structure.
Sorbent Solidification - involves the addition and mixing of materials that
limit the mobility of the waste constituents through the action of sorption.
IV. OTHER
In-situ Vitrification (ISV) - is a thermochemical treatment process that destroys,
removes, or immobilizes hazardous wastes by electrically melting the waste media (e.g.,
soil) which upon cooling creates an extremely stable glass-like solid. ISV can be used to
treat soil and sludge contaminated with radioactive, inorganic, or organic wastes or
mixtures of these contaminants.
Ground Water Technologies:
Treatment technologies for ground water are grouped based on the categories commonly used in
the waste water treatment industry: chemical/physical treatment biological, and other. The
technologies are listed in their order of appearance in Exhibit 5.
I. CHEMICAL/PHYSICAL
Air Stripping (Desorption) - is a physical process that involves bringing
ground water into close contact with air thereby causing VOCs in the
liquid phase to transfer to the gas phase. For ground water, this generally
is accomplished by injecting water into an air stream. Exhaust air may
have to be treated (e.g., using carbon adsorption) to remove VOCs
before discharge to the atmosphere.
23
-------
Exhibit 7
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
SOURCE CONTROL AND GROUND WATER
(Continued)
Carbon Adsorption - is a physicochemical process that involves using
activated carbon as a sorbent to remove primarily soluble organics from air
and water. As contaminated ground water contacts activated carbon,
organic molecules become physically/chemically attached (i.e.,
adsorbed) to the carbon surface. There are two basic types of activated
carbon: granular and powdered, based on the size of the carbon
particles.
Precipitation - is a physicochemical process that involves transforming a
contaminant from solution into a solid phase. Precipitation for ground
water remediation is used primarily for the removal of heavy metals using
such precipitating chemicals as lime, alum, or iron salts. Chemical
precipitation is followed frequently by flocculation to enhance settling of
solid particles for subsequent removal by filtration or sedimentation.
Physical precipitation, including cooling, heating or altering the solvent
concentration, also can be used to alter solubilities and precipitate
contaminants.
Granular Activated Carbon - is carbon prepared by heating various types
of woods and coal to drive off hydrocarbons but with insufficient air to
sustain combustion. The resulting char is activated by exposure to an
oxidizing gas at high temperatures. The carbon particles generally are
used in carbon adsorption processes (see above).
Filtration - is a physical process that involves forcing contaminated ground
water through a porous granular-media filter (e.g., sand, anthracite) to
remove suspended particles. Several mechanisms are involved in
filtering suspended particles from the ground water, including straining,
flocculation, and sedimentation.
Ion Exchange - is a reversible process whereby toxic ions (i.e., anions
and cations) in solution are exchanged with less harmful, similarly charged
ions electrostatically attached to a solid synthetic resin material. The toxic
ions having a stronger affinity to the resin, will replace the original ions
that were placed on the resin before treatment. Once the available
exchange sites on the resin are filled, the resin can be regenerated.
Sedimentation - is the removal of suspended solids from wastewaters by
the gravitational settling of particles heavier than water. Sedimentation
may be used in ground water treatment after biological treatment or
precipitation/flocculation to remove biomass or precipitants.
UV Peroxidation - is a chemical oxidation process that uses hydrogen
peroxide in the presence of a catalyst to generate hydroxyl radicals that
react with organics and reduced compounds to yield carbon dioxide,
water, salts, simple organic acids, and/or sulfates thereby reducing the
toxicity and organic content of wastewaters. The application of ultraviolet
(UV) light to the waste treatment (photolysis) to enhance/induce chemical
24
-------
Exhibit 7
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
SOURCE CONTROL AND GROUND WATER
(Continued)
transformations can be used in conjunction with peroxidation. A major
advantage of UV application is that specific bonds can be targeted by
selecting the appropriate frequency of the light source.
Chemical Treatment - involves chemical reduction-oxidation (redox)
reactions in which the oxidation state of at least one reactant is raised
while that of another is lowered. Redox reactions can detoxify and
enhance biodegradability or adsorption (oxidation), or reduce solubility
(reduction).
Flocculation - is a chemical/physical process that involves agitating
chemically treated water to enhance precipitation and induce
coagulation. Fine suspended particles formed during precipitation
collide during gentle mixing, and agglomerate into larger heavier particles
or floes and settle out. Flocculating agents such as alum, lime, iron salts,
and organic flocculating agents are added to reduce natural repelling
surface charges on particles, and physical agitation is used for the
formation of large floes.
Activated Alumina - is an adsorption process that is used to remove
dissolved inorganic constituents such as arsenic, fluoride, and selenium.
As contaminated ground water contacts activated alumina, inorganics
become physically/chemically attached (i.e., adsorbed) to the alumina
surface. Activated alumina is a highly porous, granular form of aluminum
oxide.
Aeration - is a gas-liquid mass-transfer process that is used for adding
oxygen during biological treatment processes, or for air stripping VOCs
from wastewaters.
Neutralization (pH Adjustment) - is a chemical process that involves
adding an acid (e.g., sulfuric acid) or base (e.g., lime) to adjust the pH.
Neutralization may be used as a pretreatment before biological or
chemical treatment.
Reverse Osmosis - is a physical separation process involving membrane
filtration. Sufficient pressure is applied to a concentrated solution to
force the water from the solution to flow through a semi-permeable
membrane but selectively prevents impurities from passing through the
membrane; concentrations of impurities build up on the pressure
induced side of the membrane. Reverse osmosis is generally limited to
polishing low flow streams containing highly toxic contaminants, and is
especially effective for high molecular weight organics and ions.
25
-------
Exhibit 7
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
SOURCE CONTROL AND GROUND WATER
(Continued)
II. BIOLOGICAL
Biological Treatment (In-Situ Bioremediation) - is an in-situ process that
uses natural populations or seeded bacteria in an aquifer to transform
organic contaminants (e.g., petroleum hydrocarbons) into less hazardous
compounds thereby reducing the concentration ot hazardous
substances. The biological process generally involves the aerobic
oxidation of organic compounds by bacteria, which produce water,
carbon dioxide, and new biomass as products. In-situ biological
treatment generally is accomplished via a ground water pump-and-
reinjection system and is often limited by the ability to provide additional
oxygen and nutrients to the bacteria.
Ex-situ Bioremediation - is a batch process that uses bacteria to degrade
organic matter aerobically or anaerobically. Aerobic bioremediation
involves the conversion of organics to carbon dioxide, water, and new
bacteria cells. Anaerobic bioremediation generally involves the
conversion of organics to carbon dioxide and methane gas in the
absence of molecular oxygen. There are several biological treatment
processes, including conventional activated sludge systems and fixed
film systems (e.g., trickling filter, biotower).
III. OTHER
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POT\M - encompasses any device or
system used in the treatment (including recycling and reclamation) of
municipal or industrial wastes of a liquid nature, that is owned by a State or
municipality, including sewers, pipes, or other conveyances if they
convey wastewater to a facility providing treatment.
26
-------
Exhibit 8
RODs SIGNED PER FISCAL YEAR
Number of
RODs
82
84
85 86 87
Fiscal Year
88
89
90
RODs SIGNED PER FISCAL YEAR BY REGION
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1
3
3
7
6
5
11
11
7
1
2
1
13
15
15
22
23
32
1
2
5
10
15
5
26
18
23
1
0
0
5
13
11
12
15
20
0
2
9
20
16
14
25
32
31
0
0
4
5
6
11
21
7
11
0
1
2
1
2
3
12
11
12
0
0
1
2
7
7
4
5
18
0
2
5
3
1
5
13
18
10
0
1
2
3
3
1
7
3
4
4
13
38
69
84
77 •
153b
143C
168d
Total RODs 749
a Contains one ROD Amendment: Picillo Farm, Rl 03/03/87 amends the 09/30/85 ROD.
b Contains one ROD Amendment: Tyson's Dump, PA 03/31/88 amends the 12/21/84 ROD.
0 Contains four ROD Amendments- Ordnance Works, WV 09/29/89 amends the 03/31/88 ROD; Chemtronics, NC
04/26/89 amends the 04/05/88 ROD; Outboard Marine, IL 03/31/89 amends the 05/15/84 ROD; and
New Brighton/Arden Hills (Well #7), MN 08/11/89 amends the 06/30/86 ROD.
d Contains seven ROD Amendments: Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving, FL 9/26/90 amends the 9/25/86 ROD,
Hardage/Criner, OK 11/22/89 amends the 7/14/86 ROD; Hipps Road Landfill, FL 9/21/90 amends the 9/3/86 ROD;
Operating Industries, CA 9/27/90 amends the 11/16/87 ROD; Pristine, OH 3/30/90 amends the 12/31/87 ROD; Westlme,
PA 3/30/90 amends the 6/29/88 ROD; Zellwood Groundwater Contamination, FL 03/01/90 amends the 12/17/87 ROD.
27
-------
Exhibit 9
Number
120
100 1
80
60 •
OCCURRENCES OF SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES PER FISCAL YEAR
82
100
Occurrences of Treatment Technologies
Source Control Treatment RODs
84
85 86 87
Fiscal Year
88
89
90
OCCURRENCES OF SELECTED SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES PER FISCAL YEAR •
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
0
0
3
7
12
13
26
30
34
1
0
1
2
9
9
18
18
24
0
0
0
1
0
1
10
17
19
0
0
0
2
4
2
6
4
1
0
0
0
2
2
2
6
6
10
0
0
1
1
3
1
6
10
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
9
16
1
0
5
15
30
32
76
100
109
Total 368
a Data reflect occurrences of technologies as selected in source control RODs; more than one remedy may be
associated with a ROD.
* Denotes innovative technologies
** Contains both innovative and non-innovative technologies.
28
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES'
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
TECHNOLOGIES8
Solidification/
Stabilization (1)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (3)
Solidification/
Stabilization (1)
Biodegradation/Land
Application (1)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (7)
Solidification/
Stabilization (2)
Volatilization/Soil
Aeration (2)
Soil Washing/
Flushing (2)
Vacuum/Vapor
Extraction (1)
REGION
3
5
5
10
2
2
2
5
6
6
8
2
4
1
6
2
10
SITE NAME. STATE
Bruin Lagoon, PA
Berlin & Farro, Ml
Laskin/Poplar, OH
Western Processing,
WA*
Bioecology, TX
Old Inger, LA
Bog Creek Farm, NJ
Bridgeport, NJ
Swope Oil, NJ
Acme Solvents, IL
MOTCO, TX
Triangle Chemical, TX
Woodbury Chemical,
CO
Wide Beach, NY
Davie Landfill, FL
McKin, ME
Triangle Chemical, TX
Goose Farm, NJ
South Tacoma/Well
12-A, WA
Verona Well Field, Ml
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
29
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY85
FY86
TECHNOLOGIES3
Biodegradation/
Land Application (1)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (12)
Solidification/
Stabilization (9)
Volatilization/
Soil Aeration (4)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
5 Byron/Johnson
Salvage, IL
1 Baird & McGuire, MA
2 Hyde Park, NY*
3 Drake, PA
3 Westline, PA
4 Coleman Evans, FL
5 Mowbray Engineering,
AL°
5 Arrowhead Refinery,
MN
5 Fields Brook, OHC
5 LaSalle Electrical, IL
5 Metamora Landfill, Ml
5 Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml
6 Sikes Disposal Pit, TX
2 Marathon Battery, NY
3 Bruin Lagoon, PA
4 Mowbray Engineering,
ALb
4 Pepper's Steel, FL*
4 Sapp Battery, FL
5 Burrows Sanitation, Ml
5 Fields Brook, OHC
5 Forest Waste, Ml
10 Queen City Farms, WA*
1 Tinkhams Garage, NHb
2 Caldwell Trucking, NJ
2 Metaltec/Aerosystems,
NJ
4 Hollingsworth
Solderless, FL
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
30
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY86
FY86
FY87
TECHNOLOGIES8
Biodegradation/
Land Application (3)
Soil Washing/
Flushing (2)
Decontamination (1)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (13)
Solidification/
Stabilization (9)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
1 Tinkhams Garage, NHb
3 Leetown Pesticide, WV
5 Burlington Northern,
MN*
1 Tinkhams Garage, NHb
10 United Chrome, OR
10 Western Processing
(Amendment), WA
1 Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc
1 Ottati & Goss, NH*-C
2 Williams Property, NJ
4 Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*-C
4 Sodyeco, NC*
4 Tower Chemical, FL
5 Laskln/Poplar, OH
5 Rose Township, Ml
6 Bayou Bonfouca, LA
6 Cleve Reber, LA
6 Gurley Pit, AR*-C
6 Hardage/Criner, OK*
6 Sand Springs
Petrochemical
Complex, OK
2 Chemical Control, NJ
4 Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*-C
4 Gold Coast, FL*
4 Independent Nail, SC
5 Liquid Disposal Landfill,
Ml
5 Northern Engraving, Wl*
6 Gurley Pit, ARC
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
31
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES**
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION
SITE NAME. STATE
FY87
Solidification/
Stabilization (9)
(Continued)
Other Treatment
Technologies (4)
Volatilization/
Soil Aeration (2)
Soil Washing/
Flushing (2)
Vacuum Extraction (1)
Biodegradation/
Land Application (1)
6
6
1
3
3
1
2
1
4
5
2
Mid-South, AR
Sand Springs
Petrochemical
Complex, OKC
Resolve, MA
Palmerton Zinc, PA*
West Virginia Ordnance
Works, WV*
Central City/Clear
Creek, CO
Ottati & Goss, NH*-C
Waldick Aerospace, NJ*
Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc
Palmetto Wood, SC
Seymour, IN*
Renora, Inc., NJ*
FY88
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (26)
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
Rose Disposal Pit, MA
Brewster Well Field, NY
Ewan Property, NJ
Lipari Landfill, NJ
Love Canal (10/26/87),
NY
Reich Farms, NJb
York Oil, NYC
Berk Sand Pits, PA
Delaware Sand &
Gravel, DE
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
32
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES'*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY88
TECHNOLOGIES8
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (26)
(Continued)
Solidification/
Stabilization (18)
BEG ION SITg NAME. STATE
3 Douglassville Disposal,
PA
3 Drake Chemical, PA
3 Fike Chemical, WVb
3 Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV*-d
3 Southern Maryland
Wood.MD
3 Wildcat Landfill, DE
4 Zellwood, FLC
5 Forest Waste Disposal,
Ml
5 Fort Wayne, IN
5 LaSalle Electrical, IL
5 Summit National, OH
6 Brio Refining, TX*
6 Old Midland Products,
AR
7 Minker Stout/Romaine,
MO
7 Syntex Verona, MO*
7 Times Beach, MO
8 Broderick Wood, CO*
2 Love Canal (09/26/88),
NY
2 Marathon Battery, NY°
2 York Oil, NYC
3 Aladdin, PA
3 Fike Chemical, WV
4 Chemtronics, NC*-d
4 Flowood, MS*
5 Mid-State Disposal, Wl
5 Velsicol Chemical, IL
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
33
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY88
TECHNOLOGIES8
Solidification/
Stabilization (18)
(Continued)
Vacuum/Vapor
Extraction (10)
Volatilization/Soil
Aeration (6)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
6 Bailey Waste Disposal,
TX*
6 Industrial Waste Control,
AR*
7 Arkansas City Dump, KS
7 Midwest Manufacturing,
IA
9 Selma Pressure
Treating, CA*
10 Commencement Bay/
Nearshore, WA*
10 Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA
10 Gould, OR*
10 Pacific Hide & Fur, WA*
1 Groveland Well, MA
1 Keefe Environmental,
NH
3 Bendix Flight Systems,
PA*-c
3 Tyson's Dump
(Amendment), PA*-d
4 Airco, KY*
4 Goodrich, B.F., KY*
6 South Valley (PL-83),
NM*
7 Hastings (09/28/88), NE
7 Hastings (09/30/88), NE
9 Motorola, AZ*
1 Cannon Engineering,
MA
2 Marathon Battery, NYC
2 Reich Farms, NJb
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
34
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES"
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY88
FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8
Volatilization/Soil
Aeration (6)
(continued)
Soil Washing/
Flushing (6)
Biodegradation/
Land Application (6)
Other Treatment
Technologies (4)
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (30)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
3 Bendix Flight Systems,
PA*
4 Wamchem, SC*
6 Long Prairie, NM
3 L.A. Clarke & Son, VAC
4 Zellwood, FL
5 United Scrap Lead, OH
5 U.S. Aviex, Ml*
6 Koppers/Texarkana,
TX*
6 South Cavalcade, TX*
1 Iron Horse Park, MAC
3 L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
4 Brown Wood
Preserving, FL*
6 Atchison/Santa Fe
(Clovis), NM*
6 French Limited, TX
6 North Cavalcade, TX
2 GE Wiring, PR*
5 Pristine, OH
6 Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX
7 Fulbright, MO*
1 Baird & McGuire, MA
1 Pinette's Salvage Yard,
MEC
1 Wells G&H, MAC
1 W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA*,C
2 Bog Creek Farm, NJ
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
35
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES'
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
RQD SIGNATURE
FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (30)
(Continued)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
2 De Rewal Chemical, NJC
2 FAA Technical Center,
NJ*-C
2 Fulton Terminals, NY
3 Douglassville Disposal,
PA*
3 M.W. Manufacturing, PA
3 Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PAb
4 Aberdeen
Pesticides/Fairway Six,
NC
4 American Creosote
Works, TNC
4 Celanese (Shelby ^Fiber
Operations), NC*-C
4 Newsom Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS
4 Smith's Farm, KYC
5 Alsco Anaconda, OH*>C
5 Big D Campground,
OH*
5 Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*-c
5 Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), ILC
5 Ionia City Landfill, Ml*
5 Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
5 New Brighton/Arden
Hills TCAAP), MN*
5 Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
5 Outboard Marine
(Amendment), Lb
5 Wedzeb Enterprises, IN
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
36
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction (30)
(Continued)
Solidification/
Stabilization (18)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
7 Vogel Paint & Wax,
IA*. b. e
8 Sand Creek Industrial,
C0*-c
8 Woodbury Chemical,
CO*
10 Northwest Transformer,
WA*
1 Sullivan's Ledge, MA
1 W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA -c
2 De Rewal Chemical, NJC
2 Marathon Battery, NY^
3 Craig Farm Drum, PA*
3 Hebelka Auto Salvage
Yard, PA
3 Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV*-C
4 Amnicola Dump, TN
4 Celanese (Shelby Fiber
Operations), NC*-C
4 Kassouf-Kimerling, FL
4 Smith's Farm, KYC
5 Auto Ion Chemicals, Ml*
5 MIDCO1,IN*.C
5 MIDCO2.IN*
6 Pesses Chemical, TX
9 Coast Wood
Preserving, CA*
9 Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA*-C
9 Purity Oil Sales, CA
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
37
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION
SITE NAME. STATE
FY89
Vacuum/Vapor
Extraction (17)
1
1
1
2
5
5
5
5
7
8
9
9
9
9
9
Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT
South Municipal Water
Supply Well, NH*
Wells G&H, MAC
FAA Technical Center,
NJ*-C
Kysor Industrial, Ml
Miami County
Incinerator, OH
MIDCO1.IN*
Wausau Water Supply
(9/29/89), Wl
NE
Hastings Ground Water,
Sand Creek Industrial,
C0"-c
Fairchild Semiconductor
(Mt. View), CA*-C (1st
Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor
(Mt. View), CA*-C (2nd
Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor
(S. San Jose), CA*
IBM (San Jose Plant),
CA*-C
Intel (Mt. View Plant),
CA*
Litchfield Airport Area,
AZ*
Raytheon (Mt. View
Plant), CA*-C
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
a RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
D ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
* ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
38
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
TECHNOLOGIES3
Biodegradatipn/
Land Application (10)
Other/Not Specified
Treatment Technologies (9)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
3 Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV*-C
3 Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PAb
4 American Creosote
Works, FL
5 Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*-c
5 Galesburg/Koppers, IL
6 Sheridan Disposal
Services (12/29/88),
TX*
7 Vogel Paint & Wax,
IA*'b'e
8 Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant), MT*
8 Libby Ground Water,
MT*
9 Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA*-C
1 Saco Tannery Waste
Pits, ME
2 Claremont
Polychemical, NY
2 SMS Instruments (Deer
Park), NY
3 Havertown PCP, PA
3 Publicker/Cuyahoga
Wrecking, PA
4 American Creosote
Works, TNC
5 Alsco Anaconda, OH*-C
7 Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS*
7 Findett, MO
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
39
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
TECHNOLOGIES8
Soil Washing/
Flushing (6)
Solvent Extraction (6)
Volatilization/Soil
Aeration (4)
REGION
2
2
2
4
5
9
1
1
1
2
5
6
9
9
9
FY90
Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
SITE NAME. STATE
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
Vineland Chemical, NJC
(Soil Washing)
Vineland Chemical, NJC
(Soil Flushing)
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC
Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), ILC
Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA*-C
Norwood PCBs, MA
O'Connor, ME*
Pinette's Salvage Yard,
MEC
Ewan Property, NJ
Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL
United Creosoting, TX
Fairchild Semiconductor
(Mt. View), CA*-C (1st
Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor
(Mt. View), CA*-C (2nd
Remedial Action)
Intel (Mt. View Plant),
CA>C
Raytheon (Mt. View
Plant), CA*-C
Beacon Heights
Landfill, CT
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
40
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8
Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
(Continued)
REGION
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
SITE NAME. STATE
Kearsarge Metallurgical,
New Bedford, MAC
FAA Technical Center,
NJ
Hooker 102nd Street,
NY
Hooker Chemical-Ruco
Polymer, NJ
Mattiace
Petrochemicals, NYb
Sayreville Landfill, NJ
Sealand Restoration,
NY
Greenwood Chemical,
VAC
M.W. Manufacturing,
PAC
Bofors Nobel, Mlb
Fisher Calo Chem, INb
Pristine (Amendment),
OHC
Springfield Township
Dump, MNC
St. Louis River, MN
Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OKC
Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, ARC
Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, ARC
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
41
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES**
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8
Incineration/Thermal
Treatment (28)
(Continued)
FY90
Immobilization (24)
REQION SITE NAME, STATE
6 Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX
6 Vertac, AR
7 FairfiekJ Coal
Gasification Plant, IA
7 Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East
Industrial Park), NEC
7 Missouri Electric Works,
MO
7 Shenandoah Stables,
MO0
8 Ogden Defense Depot,
UT
8 Sand Creek Industrial,
COP
10 FMC Yakima Pit, WA
1 New Bedford, MAC
2 Roebling Steel, NJC
3 C&R Battery, VA
3 Greenwood Chemical,
VAC
3 M.W. Manufacturing,
PAC
4 62nd Street Dump, FL
4 Cabot/Koppers, FLC
4 Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving
(Amendment), FLC
4 Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery Disposal, FL
4 Schuylkill Metal, FL
4 Yellow Water Road, FL
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
42
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
TECHNOLOGIES3
Immobilization (24)
(Continued)
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (19)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
4 Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination
(Amendment), FL
5 Oconomowoc
Electroplating, Wl
5 Sangamo/Crab Orchard
NWR (USDOI), IL
5 Springfield Township
Dump, Mlc
5 Wayne Waste Oil, INC
6 Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, ARC
6 Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, ARC
7 Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East
Industrial Park), NEC
7 Shenandoah Stables,
MO0
8 Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, COC
8 Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU17), CO
9 J.H. Baxter, CAC
10 Teledyne Wah Chang
Albany TWCA), OR
1 Stamina Mills, Rl
2 Vestal Water Supply
1-1, NY
3 Lord Shope Landfill, PA
4 Jadco-Hughes, NCC
4 SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
5 Fisher Calo Chem, INb
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
43
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (19)
(Continued)
Soil Washing (8)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
5 Hagen Farm, Wl
5 Pristine (Amendment),
OHC
5 Springfield Township
Dump, Mlc
5 Wayne Waste Oil, INC
6 Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OKC
6 Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001),
OK
7 Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE
7 Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE
8 Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, COC
8 Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18), CO
9 Intersil, CAC
9 Solvent Service, CA
9 Watkins-Johnson, CA
2 King of Prussia, NJ
2 Myers Property, NJC
4 Cabot/Koppers, FLC
4 Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving
(Amendment), FLC
5 Moss-American Kerr-
McGee Oil, Wlc
5 Wayne Waste Oil, INC
6 Arkwood, AR
8 Sand Creek Industrial,
CO0
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
44
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
BOP SIGNATURE
FY90
TECHNOLOGIES8
Thermal Desorption (6)
Bioremediation (5)
Other/Unspecified
Treatment Technologies (5)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
2 American Thermostat,
NY
2 Claremont
Polychemical, NY
2 Samey Farm, NYC
5 Bofors Nobel, Ml
5 University of Minnesota,
MN
8 Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, COc-f
4 Cabot/Koppers, FLC
4 Dubose Oil Products,
FL
5 Moss-American Kerr-
McGee Oil, Wlc
5 Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, Wl
9 J.H. Baxter, CAC
1 Kearsarge, NHC
2 Mattiace Petrochemical,
NVb
2 Radium Chemical, NYC
2 Roebling Steel, NJC
2 Sarney Farm, NYC
2 Solvent Savers, NY
3 Avtex Fibers, VA
6 Jacksonville, ARC
6 Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, ARC
9 Intersil, CAC
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
45
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES*
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1990 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIESa
In-Situ Vitrification (4)
Dechlorination (2)
Soil Flushing (2)
Volatilization/
Aeration (1)
REGION SITE NAME, STATE
5 Anderson
Development, Ml
5 Sangamo/Crab Orchard
NWR (USDOI), IL
6 Crystal Chemical, TX
8 Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU16),CO
2 Myers Property, NJC
6 Tenth Street
Dump/Junkyard, OK
3 US Titanium, VA
4 Jadco-Hughes, NCC
4 Howe Valley Landfill, KY
Enforcement-lead RODs.
Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
46
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
TECHNOLOGIES3
Solidif ication/Stabi lizatio n/
Immobilization (82)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
Bruin Lagoon, PA 3
Bioecology, TX 6
Wide Beach, NY 2
Davie Landfill, FL 4
Marathon Battery, NY 2
Bruin Lagoon, PA 3
Mowbray Engineering, AL^ 4
Pepper's Steel, FL* 4
Sapp Battery, FL 4
Burrows Sanitation, Ml 5
Fields Brook, OHC 5
Forest Waste, Ml t 5
Queen City Farms, WA* 10
Chemical Control, NJ 2
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*'C 4
Gold Coast, FL* 4
Independent Nail, SC 4
Liquid Disposal Landfill, M\ 5
Northern Engraving, Wl* 5
Gurley Pit, ARC 6
Mid-South, AR* 6
Sand Springs Petrochemical 6
Complex, OKC
Love Canal (09/26/88), NY 2
Marathon Battery, NYC 2
York Oil, NYC 2
Aladdin, PA 3
Fike Chemical, WV 3
Chemtronics,4NC*-d 4
Flowood, MS* 4
Mid-State Disposal, Wl 5
Velsicol Chemical, IL ^ 5
Bailey Waste Disposal, TX* ^ 6
Industrial Waste Control, AR* 6
Arkansas City Dump, KS 7
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
' ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
47
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODS BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY**
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3
Solidif ication/Stabi lizatio n/
Immobilization (82)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY88
FY89
FY90
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
Midwest Manufacturing, IA ^ 7
Selma Pressure Treating, CA* 9
Commencement Bay/ 10
Nearshore, WA*
Frontier Hard Chrome 10
(12/30/87), WA
Gould, OR* 10
Pacific Hide & Fur, WA* 10
Sullivan's Ledge, MA 1
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA*>C 1
De Rewal Chemical, NJC 2
Marathon Battery, NY^ 2
Craig Farm Drum, PA* 3
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA 3
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas 3
(Amendment), WV*-C
Amnicola Dump, TN 4
Celanese (Shelby Fiber 4
Operations), NC*'C
Kassouf-Kimerling, FL 4
Smith's Farm, KYC t 4
Auto Ion Chemicals, Ml* 5
MIDCO I, IN*-C 5
MIDCO II, IN* 5
Pesses Chemical, TX ^ 6
Coast Wood Preserving, CA* 9
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA*-C 9
Purity Oil Sales, CA 9
New Bedford, MAC 1
Roebling Steel, NJ 2
C&R Battery, VA 3
Greenwood Chemical, VAC 3
M.W. Manufacturing, PAC 3
62nd Street Dump, FL 4
Cabot/Koppers, FLC 4
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
48
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3
Solidification/Stabilization/
{Immobilization (82)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
Coleman-Evans Wood 4
Preserving (Amendment), FLC
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery 4
Disposal, FL
Schuylkill Metal, FL 4
Yellow Water Road, FL 4
Zellwood Groundwater 4
Contamination (Amendment), FL
Oconomowoc Electroplating, Wl 5
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), ILb 5
Springfield Township Dump, Mlc 5
Wayne Waste Oil, INC 5
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, 6
ARC
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, 6
ARC
Hastings Groundwater 7
Contamination (East Industrial
Park), NEC
Shenandoah Stables, MOC 7
Martin Marietta, Denver 7
Aerospace, COC
Rocky Mountain Arsenal 8
(OU17),CO
J.H. Baxter, CAC 9
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany 10
(TWCA), OR
Berlin & Farro, M 4
Laskin/Poplar, OH ^ 5
Western Processing, WA* 10
Bog Creek Farm, NJ 2
Bridgeport, NJ 2
Swope Oil, NJ 2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
' ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
49
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
Acme Solvents, IL 5
MOTCO, TX 6
Triangle Chemical, TX 6
Woodbury Chemical, CO 8
Baird & McGuire, MA 1
Hyde Park, NY* 2
Drake, PA 3
Westline, PA 3
Coleman Evans, FL 4
Mowbray Engineering, ALb 5
Arrowhead Refinery, MN 5
Fields Brook, OHC 5
LaSalle Electrical, IL 5
Metamora Landfill, Ml 5
Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml 5
Sikes Disposal Pit, TX 6
Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc 1
Ottati & Goss, NH*.C 1
Williams Property, NJ 2
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC*-C 4
Sodyeco, NC* 4
Tower Chemical, FL 4
Laskin/Poplar, OH 5
Rose Township, Ml 5
Bayou Bonfouca, LA 6
Cleve Reber, LA 6
Gurley Pit, AR*>C ^ 6
Hardage/Criner, OK* 6
Sand Springs Petrochemical 6
Complex, OK
Rose Disposal Pit, MA* 1
Brewster Well Field, NY 2
Ewan Property, NJ 2
Lipari Landfill, NJ 2
Love Canal (10/26/87), NY 2
Reich Farms, NJb 2
York Oil, NYC 2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
50
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY88
FY89
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
Berk Sand Pits, PA 3
Delaware Sand & Gravel, DE 3
Douglassville Disposal, PA 3
Drake Chemical, PA 3
Fike Chemical, WVb 3
Ordnance Works Disposal, 3
WV**d
Southern Maryland Wood, MD 3
Wildcat Landfill, DE 3
Zellwood, FLC 4
Forest Waste Disposal, Ml 5
Fort Wayne, IN 5
LaSalle Electrical, IL 5
Summit National, pH 5
Brio Refining, TX* 6
Old Midland Products, AR 6
Minker Stout/Romaine, MO 7
Syntex Verona, MO* 7
Times Beach, MO 7
Broderick Wood, CO* 8
Baird & McGuire, MA 1
Pinette's Salvage Yard, MEC 1
Wells G&H, MAC 1
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA*,C 1
Bog Creek Farm, NJ 2
De Rewal Chemical, NJC 2
FAA Technical Center, NJ*>C 2
Fulton Terminals, NY 2
Douglassville Disposal, PA* 3
M.W. Manufacturing, PA 3
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PAb 3
Aberdeen Pesticides/Fairway 4
Six, NC
American Creosote Works, TNC 4
Celanese (Shelby Fiber 4
Operations), NC*-C
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
8 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
51
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
FY90
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
Newsom Brothers/Old 4
Reichhold, MS
Smith's Farm, KYC ^ 4
Alsco Anaconda, OH*-C 5
Big D Campground, OH* 5
Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*'c 5
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), 5
ILC
Ionia City Landfill, Ml* 5
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH 5
New Brighton/Arden Hills 5
(TCAAP), MN*
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN 5
Outboard Marine (Amendment), 5
ILb
Wedzeb Enterprises, IN 5
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA*.b- e 7
Sand Creek Industrial, CO*'C 8
Woodbury Chemical, CO* ^ 8
Northwest Transformer, WA* 9
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT 1
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH 1
New Bedford, MAC 1
FAA Technical Center, NJ 2
Hooker 102nd Street, NY 2
Hooker Chemical-Ruco 2
Polymer, NJ
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY 2
Sayreville Landfill, NJ 2
Sealand Restoration, NY 2
Greenwood Chemical, VAC 3
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
s ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
52
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3
Incineration/Thermal
Destruction/Treatment (119)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
Biodegradation/Land
Application/Bioremediation
(27)
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
M.W. Manufacturing, PAC 3
Bofors Nobel, Mlc 5
Fisher Calo Chem, INb 5
Pristine (Amendment), OHC 5
Springfield Township Dump, Mlc 5
St. Louis River, MN 5
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), 6
OKC
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, 6
ARC
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, 6
ARC
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX 6
Vertac, AR 6
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, 7
IA
Hastings Groundwater 7
Contamination (East Industrial
Park), NEC
Missouri Electric Works, MO 7
Shenandoah Stables, MOC 7
Ogden Defense Depot, UT 8
Sand Creek Industrial, COC 8
FMC Yakima Pit, WA 10
Old Inger, LA 6
Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL 5
Tinkham Garage, NHb 1
Leetown Pesticide, WV 3
Burlington Northern, MN* 5
Renora, Inc., NJ* 2
Iron Horse Park, MAC 1
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
53
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY**
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8
Biodegradation/Land
Application/Bioremediation
(27) (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
RQD SIGNATURE
FY88
FY89
FY90
Volatilization/Soil Aeration/
Aeration (19)
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
L.A. Clarke & Son, VA t 3
Brown Wood Preserving, FL* 4
Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM* 6
French Limited, TX 6
North Cavalcade, TX 6
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas 3
(Amendment), WV*-C
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PAb 3
American Creosote Works, FL 4
Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml*-c 5
Galesburg/Koppers, IL 5
Sheridan Disposal Services 6
(12/29/88), TX*
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA*-b-e 7
Burlington Northern (Somers 8
Plant), MT*
Libby Ground Water, MT* 8
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA*-C 9
Cabot/Koppers, FLC 4
Dubose Oil Products, FL 4
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, 5
Wlc
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl 5
J.H. Baxter, CAC 9
McKin, ME 1
Triangle Chemical, TX 6
Tinkham Garage, NHb 1
Caldwell Trucking, NJ 2
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ 2
Hollingsworth Solderless, FL 4
Ottati & Goss, NH*-C ^ 1
Waldick Aerospace, NJ* 2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
D ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
' ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
54
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY1
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8
Volatilization/Soil Aeration/
Aeration (19) (Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY88
FY89
Soil Washing/Flushing (28)
FY90
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
FY89
SITE NAME. STATE REGION
Cannon Engineering 1
Marathon Battery, NYC 2
Reich Farms, NvP 2
Bendix Flight Systems, 3
PA*
Wamchem, SC* 4
Long Prarie, MN 5
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. 9
View),CA*-c (1st Remedial
Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. 9
View),CA*-c (2nd Remedial
Action)
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CA*-C 9
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant), 9
CA*>C
Howe Valley Landfill, KY 4
Goose Farm, NJ 2
South Tacoma/Well 12-A, WA 10
Tinkham Garage, NHb 1
United Chrome, OR 10
Davis Liquid Waste, Rlc 1
Palmetto Wood, SC 4
L.A. Clarke & Son, VAC 3
Zellwood, FL 4
United Scrap Lead, OH 5
U.S. Aviex, Ml* ^ 5
Koppers/Texarkana, TX* 6
South Cavalcade, TX* 6
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY 2
Vineland Chemical, NJC (Soil 2
Washing)
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
55
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODS BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3
Soil Washing/Flushing (28)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
FY90
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (48)
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
SITE NAME. STATE
REGION
Vineland Chemical, NJC (Soil 2
Flushing)
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, 4
NC
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), 5
ILC
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA*-C 9
King of Prussia, NJ 2
Myers Property, NJC 2
Cabot/Koppers, FLC 4
Coleman-Evans Wood 4
Preserving (Amendment), FLC 5
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, Wlc
Wayne Waste Oil, INC 5
Arkwood, AR 6
Sand Creek Industrial, COC 8
US Titanium, VA 3
Jadco-Hughes, NCC 4
Verona Well Field, Ml 5
Seymour, IN* 5
Groveland Well, MA 1
Keefe Environmental, NH 1
Bendix Flight Systems, PA*-C 3
Tyson's Dump (Amendment), 3
PA*'d
Airco, KY* 4
Goodrich, B.F., KY* 4
South Valley (PL-83), NM* 6
Hastings (09/28/88), NE 7
Hastings (09/30/88), NE 7
Motorola, AZ* 9
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
56
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (48)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
FY90
SITE NAME. STATE
REGION
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT 1
South Municipal Water Supply 1
Well, NH*
Wells G&H, MAC 1
FAA Technical Center, NJ*>C 2
Kysor Industrial, Ml 5
Miami County Incinerator, OH 5
MIDCO I, IN* 5
Wausau Water Supply 5
(9/29/89), Wl
Hastings Ground Water, NE 7
Sand Creek Industrial, CO*-C 8
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. 9
View), CA*'C (1st Remedial
Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. 4
View), CA*'C (2nd Remedial
Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (S. San 4
Jose), CA*
IBM (San Jose Plant), CA*-C 9
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CA*4 9
Litchfield Airport Area, AZ* 9
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant), 9
CA*'C
Stamina Mills, Rl 1
Vestal Water Supply 1 -1, NY 2
Lord Shope Landfill, PA 3
Jadco-Hughes, NCC 4
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC 4
Fisher Calo Chem, INb 5
Hagen Farm, Wl 5
Pristine (Amendment), OHC 5
Springfield Township Dump, Mlc 5
Wayne Waste Oil, INC 5
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OKC 6
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
57
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES3
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (48)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
Solvent Extraction (6)
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
FY89
In-Situ Vitrification (4)
FY90
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
FY89
SITE NAME. STATE
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
3001), OK
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE
Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, COC
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18),CO
Intersil, CAC
Solvent Service, CA
Watkins-Johnson, CA
REGION
7
7
8
8
9
9
9
Norwood PCBs, MA
O'Connor, ME*
Pinette's Salvage Yard, MEC
Ewan Property, NJ
Outboard Marine (Amendment),
IL
United Creosoting, TX
1
1
1
2
5
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
58
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODS BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8
In-Situ Vitrification (4)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY90
Dechlorination (2)
Other/Not Specified/
Unspecified Treatment
Technologies (22)
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
FY89
FY90
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
FY89
SITE NAME, STATE
Anderson Development, Ml
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), IL
Crystal Chemical, TX
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU16),CO
REGION
5
5
6
8
Myers Property, NJC
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard,
OK
Resolve, MA
Palmerton Zinc, PA*
West Virginia Ordnance Works,
WV*
Central City/Clear Creek, CO
GE Wiring, PR*
Pristine, OH
Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX
Fulbright, MO*
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
Claremont Polychemical, NY
SMS Instruments (Deer Park),
NY
2
6
1
3
3
8
2
5
6
7
1
2
2
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
6 ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
59
-------
Exhibit 11
FY 1982-1990 RODs BY
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY*'
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGIES8
Other/Not Specified/
Unspecified Treatment
Technologies (22)
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
FY90
Thermal Desorption (6)
FY82
FY83
FY84
FY85
FY86
FY87
FY88
FY89
FY90
SITE NAME, STATE
Havertown PCP, PA
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking,
PA
American Creosote Works, TNC
Alsco Anaconda, OH*-C
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS*
Findett, MO
Kearsarge, NCC
Mattiace Petrochemical, NY*3
Radium Chemical, NYC
Robeling Steel, NJC
Sarney Farm, NYC
Solvent Savers, NY
Avtex Fibers, VA
Jacksonville, ARC
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill,
ARC
Intersil, CAC
REGION
3
3
4
5
7
7
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
6
6
American Thermostat, NY
Claremont Polychemical, NY
Samey Farm, NY
Bofors Nobel, Mlb-c
University of Minnesota, MN
Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, CO3-0
2
2
2
5
5
8
* Enforcement-lead RODs
** Names of Technology Categories may have changed during 1982-1990
a RODS may contain non-source remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
e ROD selected two or more non-source control measures.
f ROD selected two types of Incineration/Thermal Treatment.
60
-------
Exhibit 12
OVERVIEW OF SOURCE CONTROL RODs WITH TREATMENT
FOR FY 1987-1990
Column 1
FY
87
88
89
90
RODs Signed
77
153
143
168
Column 2
Data Represent a Subset of Column 1
RODs Selecting One or More
Treatment Technologies for
Source Control
27
69
76
76
Column 3
Data Represent a Subset of Column 2
RODs Selecting Innovative
Treatment Technologies lor
Source Control
28
40
42
OVERVIEW OF SOURCE CONTROL OCCURRENCES WITH TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES FOR FY 1987-1990
Column A
FY
87
88
89
90
Occurrences of
Source Control
50
100
105
125
Column B
Data Represent a Subset of Column A
Occurrences of Treatment
Technologies Selected for
Source Control
32
76
100
104
Column C
Data Represent a Subset of Column B
Occurrences of Innovative
Treatment Technologies
for Source Control
30
45
47
61
-------
Exhibit 13
FY 1982-1990 ROD REMEDY COSTa'b
1982
1983
1984
1985b
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
TOTAL
0-$2M
2
8
18
23
31
25
43
44
47
241
2.1M-S5M
1
2
12
16
14
22
44
23
33
167
5.1 -$10M
1
2
3
11
11
12
31
23
30
124
10.1 - $20M
0
1
3
9
13
6
15
20
24
91
20.1 - $30M
0
0
2
4
6
5
14
7
11
49
30.1M+
0
0
0
3
9
5C
6
19
17
59
Total
RODs
Signed
4
13
38
69
84
77
153
143d
168e
749d,e
Estimates are based on present worth costs when available
Data are not available for three sites (Harris Farley, TX and two Westinghouse, IN sites that are confidential).
c Includes a combined remedial cost for the Envirochem, IN and Northside, IN, which are both represented in one ROD.
d Data are not available for seven FY 1989 RODs.
e Data are not available for six FY 1990 Federal Facility RODs
62
-------
o
81
§
O
JQ
I
o uj
>- DC
U. UJ
M
UJ
UJ
tc
CO -D
63
-------
Exhibit 15
FY 1990 TREATMENT TRAIN RODS FOR SOURCE AND GROUND
WATER CONTROL*
SOURCE CONTROL H8)
1 New Bedford, MA
2 Myers Property, NJ**
2 Solvent Savers, NY
3 Greenwood Chemical, VA
3 M.W. Manufacturing, PA
4 Cabot/Koppers, FL
4 Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving
(Amendment), FL
5 Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WP*
5 Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI),
IL
5 Springfield Township Dump, Ml
5 Wayne Waste Oil, IN
6 Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR
6 Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR
7 Hastings Groundwater Contamination
(East Industrial Park), NE
7 Shenandoah Stables, MO
8 Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO**
8 Sand Creek Industrial, CO
9 J.H. Baxter, CA
GROUND WATER (52)
1 Coakley Landfill, NH 5
1 Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH 5
1 Stamina Mills, Rl 5
2 American Thermostat, NY 5
2 Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
2 Cinnaminson Groundwater 5
Contamination, NJ 5
2 Claremont Polychemical, NY 5
2 FAA Technical Center, NJ 5
2 Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY 5
2 Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ 6
2 Myers Property, NJ** Q
2 Solvent Savers, NY
3 Croydon TCE Spill, PA 7
3 Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA 7
3 Lord Shope Landfill, PA 7
3 Osborne Landfill, PA 7
3 Raymark, PA 7
3 Sand Gravel & Stone, MD 8
3 US Titanium, VA
4 62nd Street Dump, FL 8
4 City Industries, FL 8
4 Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving 8
(Amendment), FL 8
4 Jadco-Hughes, NC 9
4 SCRDI Bluff Road, SC 9
4 Schuylkill Metal, FL 9
5 Fisher CaloChem, IN 10
5 K&L Landfill, Ml
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN**
Metamora Landfill, Ml**
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, Wl**
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant,
MN
Oconomowoc Electroplating, Wl
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Wl
Pristine (Amendment), OH
Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml**
Wayne Waste Oil, IN
Crystal Chemical, TX
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001),
OK
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, lA
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
Missouri Electric Works, MO
White Farm Equipment Dump, IA
Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace,
CO**
Ogden Defense Depot, UT
Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO
Silver Bow Creek, MT
J.H. Baxter, CA
Solvent Service, CA
Stringfellow, CA
Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA
* Treatment train RODs employ a sequence of treatment technologies to address a specific
medium or constituent.
"Selected treatment trains for both source and ground water.
64
-------
SECTION II
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
ROD summaries are arranged alphabetically by Region. The States in each Region
are listed at the beginning of each Region; however, not all States have had a ROD
signed in FY 1990.
Each ROD summary presented in this section consists of the following:
• ROD Abstract - summarizing site location and background information,
contaminated media, key contaminants, selected remedial action, and
present worth or capital costs and O&M costs.
Performance Standards or Goals - describing qualitative/quantitative
cleanup criteria.
• Institutional Controls - describing ordered site restrictions.
Keywords - highlighting treatment technologies, contaminated media, key
contaminants, and major keyword categories for the RODs. A list of
RODs by keywords is presented in the last section of this document.
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
FY1990
CONTENTS
SITE NAME/STATE
Region 1
Baird & McGuire, MA 73
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT 73
Coakley Landfill, NH 74
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH 75
New Bedford, MA 76
Old Springfield Landfill, VT 77
Stamina Mills, RI 78
Region 2
American Thermostat, NY 79
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ 79
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ 80
Claremont Polychemical, NY 81
FAA Technical Center, NJ 82
Forest Glen Subdivision, NY 82
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ 83
Higgins Farm, NJ 84
Hooker-102nd Street, NY 84
Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY 85
Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ 86
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY 87
King of Prussia, NJ 88
Lone Pine Landfill, NJ 89
M&T DeLisa Landfill, NJ 89
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ 90
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY 91
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ 91
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ 92
Myers Property, NJ 93
Pomona Oaks Well Contamination, NJ 94
Radium Chemical, NY 94
Roebling Steel, NJ 95
Sarney Farm, NY 96
Sayreville Landfill, NJ 96
Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ 97
Sealand Restoration, NY 98
Solvent Savers, NY 99
Syosset Landfill, NY 100
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY 100
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ 101
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ 102
67
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
FY1990
CONTENTS
(Continued)
SITE NAME/STATE PAGE
Region 3
Army Creek Landfill, DE 103
Avtex Fibers, VA 103
Brown's Battery Breaking, PA 104
Butz Landfill, PA 105
C&R Battery, VA 106
Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE 106
Croydon TCE Spill, PA 107
Cryo-Chem, PA 108
Dover Air Force Base, DE 109
East Mt. Zion, PA 109
Fike Chemical, WV 110
Greenwood Chemical, VA 111
Hranica Landfill, PA 111
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA 112
Lord Shope Landfill, PA 113
M.W. Manufacturing, PA 114
Osborne Landfill, PA 115
Raymark, PA 116
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD 117
Tyson Dump #1, PA 117
US Titanium, VA 118
Walsh Landfill, PA 119
Westline (Amendment), PA 120
Region 4
62nd Street Dump, FL 121
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC 121
Cabot/Koppers, FL 122
City Industries, FL 123.
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL 124
Dubose Oil Products, FL 125
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL 126
Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL 127
Howe Valley Landfill, KY 127
Jadco-Hughes, NC 128
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL 129
Lewisburg Dump, TN 130
Munisport Landfill, FL 131
National Starch & Chemical, NC 132
North Hollywood Dump, TN 132
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL 133
Schuylkill Metal, FL 134
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC 135
68
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
FY1990
CONTENTS
(Continued)
SITE NAME/STATE PAGE
Region 4 (continued)
Yellow Water Road, FL 135
Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL 136
Region 5
Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI 138
Anderson Development, MI 138
Bofors Nobel, MI 139
Clare Water Supply, MI 140
Fisher Calo Chem, IN 140
Hagen Farm, WI 141
Hunts Disposal, WI 142
Janesville Ash Beds, WI 143
Janesville Old Landfill, WI 143
K&L Landfill, MI 144
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN 145
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI 146
Metamora Landfill, MI 147
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI 147
National Presto Industries, WI 148
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN 149
NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL 150
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI 151
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI 152
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI 153
Pristine (Amendment), OH 154
Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN 155
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL 155
Spiegelberg Landfill, MI 156
Springfield Township Dump, MI 157
St. Louis River, MN 158
Tri-State Plating, IN 158
Union Scrap Iron Metal, MN 159
University of Minnesota, MN 159
Wayne Waste Oil, IN 160
Wheeler Pit, WI 161
Region 6
Arkwood, AR 163
Cimarron Mining, NM 164
Crystal Chemical, TX 164
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK 165
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR 167
69
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
FY1990
CONTENTS
(Continued)
SITE NAME/STATE PAGE
Region 6 (continued)
Pagano Salvage, NM 167
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR 168
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK 169
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX 170
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK 170
Vertac, AR 172
Region 7
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA 173
Hastings Groundwater Contamination
(East Industrial Park), NE 174
Hastings Groundwater Contamination (FAR-MAR-CO), NE 174
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE 175
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA 176
Missouri Electric Works, MO 177
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA 178
Shenandoah Stables, MO 178
Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE 179
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO 180
Wheeling Disposal Service, MO 181
White Farm Equipment Dump, IA 181
Region 8
East Helena, MT 183
Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO 183
Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT 184
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY 185
Ogden Defense Depot, UT 186
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT 187
Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO 188
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO 189
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO 189
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO 190
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO 191
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO 192
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU22), CO 192
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO 193
Sand Creek Industrial, CO 194
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT 194
Silver Bow Creek, MT 195
Whitewood Creek, SD 196
70
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
FY1990
CONTENTS
(Continued)
SITE NAME/STATE PAGE
Region 9
Applied Materials, CA 198
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA 198
Intel (Santa Clara III), CA 199
Intersil, CA 200
J.H. Baxter, CA 200
Louisiana-Pacific, CA 201
Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA 202
Solvent Service, CA 202
Stringfellow, CA 203
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA 204
Region 10
FMC Yakima Pit, WA 206
Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA 206
Silver Mountain Mine, WA 207
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR 208
71
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 1
(Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont)
BAIRD & MCGUIRE, MA
Third Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 20-acre Baird & McGuire site is a former
chemical manufacturing facility in Holbrook,
Massachusetts. The South Street wellfield, part
of the municipal water supply for Holbrook, is
located within 1,500 feet of the property.
Bordering on the east of the site, the Cochato
River, which flows down past a sluice gate, is
the major water supply source for the towns of
Holbrook, Randolph, and Braintree. Products
mixed and stored at the Baird & McGuire site
included herbicides, pesticides, disinfectants,
soaps, floor waxes, and solvents. Waste
disposal methods at the site included direct
discharge into the soil, nearby brook, and
wetlands, as well as a former gravel pit (now
covered) in the eastern portion of the site. In
1983, EPA conducted a removal action after a
waste lagoon overflowed near the Cochato
River and spread contaminants into the river.
A second removal action was initiated in 1985
when dioxin was discovered in site soil.
Between 1985 and 1987, EPA conducted an
Initial Remedial Measure to construct a new
water main to replace the main passing
through the site and to place temporary caps
over some of the site. The 1986 and 1989
Records of Decision (RODs) addressed all of
the previous remedial activities at the site
including pumping and onsite treatment of
ground water (OU1), as well as onsite
excavation and incineration of contaminated soil
(OU2), and remediation of the sediment of the
Cochato River (OU3). This remedial action
addresses the fourth operable unit, provision of
an alternate water supply to compensate for the
loss of the South Street wellfield and provide
an additional 0.31 million gallons/day. Since
the previous RODs have addressed all of the
site-related contamination, there are no
contaminants of concern associated with this
remedial action.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes future reactivation of the Donna Road
aquifer, by obtaining Federal and local permits
to increase the allowable capacity of water
withdrawal; constructing a new well,
performing pre-design tests required to obtain
the permits, ground water filtration and
disinfection, and piping the water to the
current distribution system. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$1,188,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $23,000 for 20 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy; O&M; State
Permit.
BEACON HEIGHTS LANDFILL, CT
First Remedial Action - Final (Supplemental)
September 28, 1990
The 34-acre Beacon Heights Landfill site is on
the northwest corner of an 82-acre property in
Beacon Falls, Connecticut. From the 1920s to
1970, a 6-acre area of the site was used as a
dumping and incineration area. The site was
subsequently expanded to a 34-acre area where
waste materials including industrial liquids and
chemicals were buried until the State closed the
landfill in 1979. Industrial wastewater sludge
also was disposed of onsite. Because of a slide
of soil and buried waste in 1972, ground water
and leachate discharge points were created in
the north/northwestern areas of the landfill;
several of these discharge points still persist in
the slide area. In 1984, sampling of forty-four
residential wells downgradient of the site
revealed VOC-contaminated water in two
residential wells. As a result of the sampling,
the State provided bottled drinking water to
the affected residents. A 1985 Record of
Decision (ROD) documented remedial activities,
including consolidation and capping of
contaminated soil at the six-acre area;
installation of a leachate collection system; and
extension of a public water supply line to area
residences. This ROD supplements the 1985
ROD by resolving those determinations left
open in the 1985 ROD including the manner
and locations of leachate treatment/disposal;
cleanup levels for soil deemed impracticable to
cap in areas contiguous to the landfill; and the
need for air pollution controls on the landfill
73
-------
gas vents. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, ground water, surface
water, and air are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes.
The selected remedial action for this site
supplements the remedial actions documented
in the 1985 ROD and includes off site leachate
treatment at a wastewater treatment facility
prior to offsite discharge of the treated effluent
to offsite surface water; offsite incineration of
the sludge generated during leachate treatment;
monitoring of landfill gases; and providing the
criteria for excavation of the contaminated soil
deemed impracticable to cap. Although air
pollution controls are not currently necessary,
the vents to be built into the future cap will be
constructed in such a way as to facilitate the
addition of pollution control devices should
continual monitoring reveal levels of air
contaminants exceeding Federal and State
standards. The present worth cost for this
supplemental remedial action is $2,241,000, with
a present worth O&M cost of $951,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
In order to protect the aquifer underlying the
site from further potential contamination,
excavation levels for contaminants of concern in
soil contiguous to the area of the landfill
deemed impracticable to cap are based on
leachate modeling. In the absence of a
chemical-specific ARAR, cleanup goals will be
based on a 10* excess cancer risk level for
carcinogens or a HI=1 for noncarcinogens. Soil
excavation levels include benzene 0.08 mg/kg,
TCE 0.01 mg/kg, toluene 100 mg/kg, and
xylenes 500 mg/kg. No cleanup levels for
leachate were set because all but negligible
amounts of leachate will be removed and
treated offsite. The treatment effluent will meet
all NPDES permit requirements prior to
discharge to surface water.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Ground Water;
Leachability Tests; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLGs; MCLs; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Organics; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
State Permit; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water; TCE; Toluene; Treatment
Technology; Venting; VOCs; Xylenes.
COAKLEY LANDFILL, NH
First Remedial Action
June 28, 1990
The 92-acre Coakley Landfill site is in the
towns of Greenland and North Hampton,
Rockingham County, New Hampshire. The site
includes a 27-acre landfill, and borders
farmland, undeveloped woodlands, and
wetlands to the north and west and commercial
and residential properties to the east and south.
A drainage bounds the southern and western
sides of the landfill, channeling surface water
runoff into wetlands north of the landfill. Sand
and gravel operations were conducted from
1968 to 1972 during which time rock quarrying
and landfill operations also were conducted.
From 1972 to 1985, the landfill primarily
accepted refuse from Pease Air Force Base and
neighboring municipalities and later accepted
incinerator residue from the refuse-to-energy
plant operated at Pease Air Force Base. Much
of the refuse disposed of at the landfill was
placed in open trenches created by the rock
quarrying and sand and gravel operations. In
1979, the State received complaints concerning
leachate breakouts in the area, and by 1983
VOC-contamination had been identified in a
domestic drinking water well. Subsequent
testing confirmed VOC-contamination in the
ground water, and public water was extended
to area residents and businesses who had
previously received water from private wells.
This Record of Decision (ROD), the first of two
operable units, addresses source control and
ground water contamination near the landfill.
A subsequent ROD will address offsite ground
water contamination should it be determined
that a contaminated plume underlying wetlands
to the north of the site requires remediation.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, sediment, and ground water below the
surface of the landfill are VOCs including
benzene and PCE; other organics including
phenols; and metals including arsenic and
chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating and consolidating
approximately 2,000 cubic yards of wetlands
sediment and 30,000 cubic yards of solid waste
and depositing the material into the landfill
74
-------
prior to capping; collecting and treating landfill
gases using a thermal destruction process;
ground water pumping and treatment using
chemical precipitation for metals removal, air
stripping for VOC removal, and biological
treatment, if necessary, prior to recharge into
the aquifer or discharge to onsite surface water;
treating air from the air stripper using
incineration or activated carbon filtration prior
to release to the atmosphere; implementing site
access restrictions; and long-term environmental
monitoring including air and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for the remedial action is $20,200,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $245,000 for
30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels were established to measure
contaminant levels in the sediment remaining
in the wetlands following excavation and will
protect the aquifer from potential soil leachate.
Soil cleanup values are based on the Organic
Leaching Model and incorporates SDWA
MCLs/MCLGs and State standards.
Chemical-specific soil cleanup goals include
benzene 0.055 mg/kg, PCE 0.13 mg/kg, and
phenols 2.3 mg/kg. Ground water cleanup
goals will meet SDWA MCLs/MCLGs, State
standards, and health advisories and include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), PCE 3.5 ug/1 (State),
arsenic 50 ug/1 (MCL), phenols 280 ug/1
(health advisory), and chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL). In the absence of a chemical-specific
cleanup standard, cleanup levels will be based
on a 10* excess cancer risk level and/or a
Hazard Index = 1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic; Background Levels; Benzene; Capping;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE;
Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Treatment Technology; Venting; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
KEARSARGE METALLURGICAL, NH
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The nine-acre Kearsarge Metallurgical site is an
abandoned foundry in the town of Conway,
Carroll County, New Hampshire. The site is
located within the 100-year floodplain of the
Saco River. Pequawket Pond borders the site
to the south. The site contains a drainage pipe
with four open-bottomed catch basins, two
waste piles, a septic tank and leach field, and
forested wetlands. The site was originally
operated as a saw mill but from 1964 to 1982
was operated as a foundry. Wastes generated
by Kearsarge, the foundry operator, included
solid wastes such as ceramics and metal
grindings, and hazardous substances including
caustic soda, hydrofluoric acid, volatile organic
compounds, and flammable liquids. These
were disposed of in the septic system and in
the waste piles. In 1979, the State ordered
Kearsarge to stop disposing of wastes through
the septic system. Wastes were subsequently
placed in drums and stored onsite, but
Kearsarge removed them in 1982. A hydrologic
study in 1982 revealed contamination of ground
water in the upper aquifer underlying the site,
a potential drinking water source. This Record
of Decision (ROD) addresses both source
control and management of migration of the
contaminated ground water plume. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including TCE; and metals including chromium.
The selected remedial action for the site
includes removing the septic tank and contents,
followed by offsite incineration and ash
disposal in a RCRA hazardous waste landfill;
excavating and dewatering approximately 250
cubic yards of leach field soil, followed by
offsite treatment and disposal; excavating 4,650
cubic yards of waste pile materials with offsite
disposal of approximately 4,400 cubic yards in
a RCRA solid waste landfill and offsite
treatment and disposal of approximately 250
cubic yards in a hazardous waste landfill;
ground water pumping and treatment by
precipitating metals, air stripping to remove
VOCs, using a carbon column to control air
emissions from the air stripper, and discharging
treated ground water to a publicly owned
treatment works; and long-term environmental
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for source control, including O&M, is
$3,256,000. The estimated present worth cost
75
-------
for management of migration is $4,020,000,
including an annual O&M cost of $170,000.
The total present worth cost of the remedial
action is $7,276,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels include TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL) and chromium 50 ug/1 (National
Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation).
For the debris, chromium will be remediated to
the level of 1,400 ug/kg, based on a Hazard
Index of 1. Soil cleanup levels were also
provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; MCLs;
MCLGs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge;
Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solvents; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
VOCs; Wetlands.
NEW BEDFORD, MA
First Remedial Action
April 6, 1990
The New Bedford site is a harbor area in the
port city of New Bedford, Massachusetts,
approximately 55 miles south of Boston. Two
electrical capacitor manufacturing facilities, the
Aerovox facility and the Cornell-Dubilier
Electronics facility, are located along the New
Bedford Harbor and were major PCB users
from the 1940s to 1978, when EPA banned the
use of PCBs. These manufacturers released
PCB-contaminated wastewater onto shoreline
mudflats and into the harbor. As a result of
the widespread PCB contamination, the State
closed three fishing areas in the harbor in 1979,
resulting in the loss of approximately 18,000
acres of productive lobstering ground. Between
1982 and 1985, EPA and the Coast Guard
posted warnings notifying the public of fishing
and swimming restrictions. The site has been
divided into three study areas which include
the Hot Spot area, the Acushnet River Estuary,
and the Lower Harbor and Upper Buzzards
Bay. This Record of Decision (ROD), the first
of two operable units, is an interim remedy
and addresses the 5-acre Hot Spot area, located
along the western bank of the Acushnet River
Estuary adjacent to the Aerovox facility. This
first interim action operable unit will remove
approximately 48 percent of the total PCB mass
in the sediment from the estuary portion of the
site, which is a continuing source of
contamination throughout the entire site. A
subsequent ROD will address the remediation
of the Acushnet River Estuary and the Lower
Harbor and Upper Buzzards Bay. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the sediment
in the New Bedford Harbor are organics
including PCBs and metals including lead.
The selected interim remedial action for the site
includes dredging 10,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sediment, dewatering the
sediment using an existing confined disposal
facility (CDF) and incinerating the sediment
onsite; solidifying/stabilizing the residual ash
to immobilize metals, if a leaching test indicates
it is necessary; treating effluent from the
dewatering process using the best available
control technology prior to discharge into the
harbor; and passing exhaust gases from the
incineration process through air pollution
control devices prior to their release into the
atmosphere. During the remedial action the
solidified/stabilized ash will be temporarily
stored onsite, and following the completion of
the remedial action, the ash will be stored and
covered in a secondary cell of the CDF.
Ultimate disposition of the ash will be
addressed in the second operable unit. The
estimated total cost for this remedial action is
$14,379,300. No O&M costs were specified.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Sediment areas where PCB concentrations
exceed 4,000 mg/kg (based on a cancer risk
level of 10"6) will be dredged and incinerated.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: The Coast
Guard and EPA have implemented fishing
restrictions to prevent ingestion of contaminated
aquatic life.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Dredging; Floodplain; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls; Interim
Remedy; Leachability Tests; Lead; Metals;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCBs; Public Exposure; RCRA; Sediment;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
76
-------
Standards/Regulations; Temporary Storage;
Toxic Substances Control Act; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; Water Quality
Criteria; Wetlands.
OLD SPRINGFIELD LANDFILL, VT
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1990
The Old Springfield Landfill site is a 27-acre
inactive municipal/industrial landfill
approximately one mile from the Springfield
city center in Windsor County, Vermont. Land
use within a one-mile radius of the site
includes commercial activities, low density
housing, light agriculture, and undeveloped
forest land. The landfill was operated by the
town of Springfield between 1947 and 1968,
accepting industrial waste and municipal trash.
The site was closed in 1968, and subsequently
sold and developed for use as a mobile home
park. Municipal water lines were extended to
serve the mobile homes. A nearby resident's
complaint about foul-smelling water prompted
an investigation of the site by the State, which
revealed VOC contamination in a nearby spring
and the residential well. Because of the
VOC-contaminated water, the affected home
near the mobile home park was connected to
the public water supply. Currently the mobile
home park is unoccupied except for the
property owner who still resides onsite. The
site has been divided into two operable units.
Operable unit one is documented in a 1988
Record of Decision (ROD) which addressed
management of migration of the contaminated
seeps and ground water from the site and
required that additional studies would be
conducted to determine the source control
remedy for the site. This second operable unit
ROD documents the source control remedy,
which addresses the risks associated with the
inhalation of landfill gases and dermal contact
with and ingestion of contaminated soil. In
addition, this ROD also addresses risks
associated with the ingestion of contaminated
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; and other organics including
PAHs and PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes placing a multi-layer cap over
approximately eight acres (120,000 cubic yards
of contaminated soil) where waste has been
disposed of or has come to be located or where
the soil cleanup levels are exceeded; collecting
ground and surface water in french drains and
extracting ground water with source control
wells with treatment, as necessary, in the
treatment system developed in operable unit
one or other equivalent treatment system (not
specified); stabilizing the side slopes of the
waste mounds; active gas collecting and passive
gas venting of landfill gases, followed by
treatment using vapor phase carbon adsorption;
operating and maintaining these components;
ground water and air monitoring; and
implementing institutional controls, including
deed restrictions. The estimated present worth
cost of this remedial action is $8,692,800, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $123,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Goals for soil cleanup (i.e., areas of
contamination to be capped) are based on total
carcinogenic risk levels of 10s and include
PCBs 6,000 ug/kg (5 x lOf* level of risk) and
PAHs 3,000 ug/kg (5 x 10* level of risk).
Chemical-specific ground water treatment goals
are based on SDWA MCLs and State standards
and include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL), xylenes 400 ug/1 (State standard), and
PCE 5 ug/1 (proposed MCLs/quantitative
limit). Because EPA has determined that in
this circumstance it is technically impracticable,
from an engineering perspective, to establish a
standard below a practical quantitative level,
EPA is invoking a waiver from compliance
with the State standard for PCE.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be imposed on the use of the
land, including restricting excavation that might
compromise the integrity of the cap, french
drains, or other remedial features and on the
use of ground water.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; ARAR Waiver;
Benzene; Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs;
MCLGs; O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; Cleanup Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Treatment Technology; Venting; VOCs;
Rural/Residential.
77
-------
STAMINA MILLS, RI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The five-acre Stamina Mills site is a former
textile weaving and finishing facility in North
Smithfield, Providence County, Rhode Island.
A portion of the site is within the 100-year
floodplain and wetland area of the Branch
River. The facility was operated from the early
1800s to 1975, and was subsequently destroyed
by a fire. The manufacturing process used
cleaning solvents, acids, bases and dyes for
coloring, pesticides for moth proofing, and
plasticizers to coat fabrics. Mill process wastes
were landfilled onsite. TCE was used to
remove oil and dirt from newly woven fabrics.
In 1969, an unknown quantity of TCE was
spilled onsite, and migrated into soil and the
bedrock aquifer beneath the site with some
runoff to the Branch River. EPA initiated three
removal actions from 1984 to 1990, including an
extension of the municipal water supply to
residents obtaining water from the affected
aquifer; and treatment of two underground and
one above-ground storage tanks, followed by
offsite disposal. Subsequent investigations have
identified a septic tank that may be
contaminated with TCE. This Record of
Decision (ROD) provides a final remedy, and
addresses both source control and management
of contaminated ground water migration at this
site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil, debris, sediment, and ground
water are VOCs including TCE and PCE; other
organics including pesticides; and metals
including chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes treating VOC-contaminated soil using
vacuum extraction, followed by treatment of
the extracted gases using an activated carbon
filter; excavating approximately 550 cubic yards
of landfill wastes, and sediment from the
Branch River 100-year floodplain area; placing
these within the landfill area outside of the
floodplain; capping landfill wastes and
installing a leachate collection system to collect
runoff from the landfill; testing, removing, and
disposing of the septic tanks and their contents
offsite; demolishing and removing partially
standing structures with onsite disposal of all
earthen debris and disposing of all other solid
wastes offsite; grading and vegetating the site
after remediation; ground water pumping,
pressure filtration, and treatment using
UV/hydrogen peroxide innovative technology;
discharging the treated ground water to surface
water, subsurface water onsite, or existing
sewer line contingent upon pilot test studies;
surface water diversion; long-term monitoring
of ground and surface waters; and
implementing institutional controls including
deed restrictions to limit land use. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $4316,485, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $164,400.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels that will ensure attainment
of MCLs in ground water include TCE 195
ug/kg (MCL) and PCE 66 ug/kg (Proposed
MCL, PMCL). Soil levels for chromium were
not established since elevated levels were
detected only in landfill wastes that will be
consolidated and capped as part of this
remediation. Ground water cleanup levels
include TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), PCE 5 ug/1
(PMCL), and chromium 50 ug/1 (National
Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be implemented to regulate
land use and prevent disturbance of remediated
areas at the site.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite Disposal;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCE; Pesticides; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil;
Solvents; State Standards/Regulations; Surface
Water Monitoring; TCE; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Vacuum
Extraction; Wetlands.
78
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 2
(New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands)
AMERICAN THERMOSTAT, NY
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1990
The 8-acre American Thermostat (AT) site is a
former thermostat assembly facility in South
Cairo, Greene County, New York. Surrounding
land use is agricultural and light residential.
The site overlies a shallow unconsolidated
aquifer and a deeper bedrock aquifer. From
1954 to 1985, thermostats for small appliances
were assembled using machine oils, lubricants,
and solvents in the process. Waste chemical
sludge were disposed of directly into drains
and dumped onsite for dust control. In 1981,
after employees were observed dumping
solvents onsite, a State investigation was
conducted, which revealed a high level of VOC
contamination in the ground water near the
site. As a result, in 1982 AT supplied bottled
water to affected residents and installed carbon
filters on affected wells. In 1983, an interim
consent order was signed requiring AT to
cleanup the site; however, this was never
implemented before plant operations ceased in
1985. A 1988 Record of Decision (ROD)
provided for a permanent alternate water
supply for approximately 43 affected residents.
This final ROD addresses remediation of all
remaining contaminated media at the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, sediment, sludge, debris, ground water,
and surface water are VOCs including PCE and
TCE; other organics; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating and treating 6,500 cubic
yards of contaminated soil using low
temperature enhanced volatilization; removing
300 cubic yards of contaminated sediment from
a residential pond and treating it concurrently
with the soil; backfilling the treated soil and
sediment and covering the area with clean soil;
pumping and treatment of ground water using
filtration, air stripping, and carbon adsorption,
followed by reinjecting treated water onsite;
decontaminating the AT building; removing 18
waste oil drums, debris, and less than 5 cubic
yards of drain sludge from the building for
offsite treatment and disposal; disposing of all
treatment residuals offsite; and conducting
ground water and air monitoring. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $26,102,200, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $1,304,300 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific goals for soil include PCE
1.0 mg/kg and TCE 0.4 mg/kg. Ground water
chemical-specific cleanup goals include PCE
5.0 ug/1, TCE 5.0 ug/1, arsenic 25.0 ug/1,
chromium 50 ug/1, and lead 25 ug/1, all of
which are State MCLs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEY WORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Closure; Clean
Water Act; Chromium; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Dredging;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Leachability Tests;
Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Oils; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE;
RCRA; Sediment; Sludge; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; TCE;
Treatment Technology; VOCs;
Volatilization/Soil Aeration; Water Quality
Criteria.
CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 31-acre Chemical Lean-van Tank Lines site
is a liquid tanker truck terminal and cleaning
operation in Logan Township, Gloucester
County, New Jersey. Surrounding land use is
primarily rural residential. An extensive
wetlands area occupies the southern and
eastern portions of the site. An underlying
aquifer was used as a local drinking water
supply until the late 1970s when ground water
contaminants including solvents, were detected
in the aquifer. From 1961 to 1975, wastewater
from tanker washing and rinsing operations
was discharged into a network of seven
unlined settling/aeration lagoons, which have
been determined to be the source of the present
79
-------
organic and inorganic contamination of soil,
ground water, and adjacent wetlands. In 1975,
a rinse-water containment system was installed
and the lagoons were no longer used in the
wastewater process. In 1977, liquid remaining
in the lagoons was drained to the wetlands,
sludge was removed from settling lagoons, and
these were filled with clean soil and
construction debris. Aeration lagoons were
filled with perimeter diking materials and
construction debris, but the sludge was not
removed. In 1982, visible sludge was again
removed from the settling lagoons. From 1980
to 1981, the State documented onsite and offsite
ground water contamination and consequently,
in 1987, six homes were connected to a public
water supply as part of a removal action. A
current removal action will connect four more
homes to this system. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation of the ground
water contaminant plume. Subsequent RODs
will address source control, surface water, and
sediment contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting ground water
are VOCs including benzene, PCE, and TCE;
other organics; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and treatment of ground
water using chemical precipitation to remove
metals, an air stripper to remove VOCs, and
granular activated carbon to remove residual
organic contaminants; incinerating fumes from
the air stripper unit onsite; discharging treated
water to onsite surface water; ground water
monitoring; and conducting further studies to
more thoroughly characterize the contamination
and the contaminant plume, and to more
thoroughly define the design and operation of
the treatment system. The estimated present
worth cost of this remedial action is $5,420,000,
which includes an estimated annual O&M cost
of $320,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Aquifer cleanup levels will utilize both Federal
and State Safe Drinking Water Act MCLs,
which include benzene 1 ug/1 (State MCL),
PCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL), TCE 1 ug/I (State
MCL), arsenic 50 ug/1 (MCL), chromium
50 ug/1 (State MCL), and lead 15 ug/1
(proposed MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCE; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs; Wetlands.
CINNAMINSON GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 400-acre Cinnaminson Groundwater
Contamination site is in the townships of
Cinnaminson and Delran, Burlington County,
New Jersey, and is comprised of a landfill,
several industrial operations, and residential
properties. The site overlies a deep and a
shallow aquifer, and the latter is a potential
source of drinking water. Furthermore, the site
lies within the Delaware River floodplain.
Land use in the vicinity of the site is
residential, agricultural, and industrial. The
onsite landfill was originally used for sand and
gravel mining operations. From 1950 to 1980,
municipal solid waste and other refuse were
deposited in the mining pits, while mining
operations continued in other site areas. In
1970, Sanitary Landfill Inc. (SLI) operated an
onsite sanitary landfill in the same area, which
accepted hazardous industrial waste. In 1980,
the State identified improper waste disposal
practices onsite, and ordered SLI to close the
landfill. In 1981 as part of the closure plan,
SLI capped the landfill with 18 inches of clay,
installed a gas collection and venting system,
and initiated ground water monitoring.
Subsequent ground water studies by EPA and
SLI identified onsite ground water
contamination in the landfill area.
Additionally, various onsite industrial
operations and local area septic systems were
also identified as potential sources of ground
water contamination. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation of onsite
contaminated ground water in the shallow and
deep aquifers, and prevention of further
migration of contamination into municipal
wells. The adequacy of the SLI landfill closure
will be addressed in a subsequent ROD. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
80
-------
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other organics
including PAHs and phenols; and metals
including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and treatment of ground
water from the shallow and deep aquifers
using chemical precipitation and
biological/granular activated carbon; reinjecting
the treated water onsite into the deep aquifer;
ground water monitoring; and implementing
engineering and institutional controls. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $20,500,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $751,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals
are based on the more stringent of SDWA
MCLs or State Standards including benzene
1 ug/1 (State), xylenes 44 ug/1 (State), and
arsenic 50 ug/1 (State).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented at the site.
Keywords: Arsenic; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; Mining Wastes; O&M; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; Organic; PAHs; PCE;
Phenols; Safe Drinking Water Act; Solvents;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Xylenes.
CLAREMONT POLYCHEMICAL, NY
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 9.5-acre Claremont Polychemical site is an
abandoned production facility in Oyster Bay,
Nassau County, New York. Land use in the
vicinity of the site is light industrial and
commercial. From 1968 to 1980 when onsite
operations ceased, Claremont Polychemical
manufactured inks and pigments for plastics,
coated metallic flakes, and vinyl stabilizers in
several onsite buildings, which had asbestos
insulation. The principal wastes generated
were organic solvents, resins, and mineral
spirits wash wastes. In 1979, the State
identified improper storage practices onsite,
including stockpiles of over 2,000 uncovered or
leaking drums of wastes and an onsite spill
area. Organic solvents from several onsite
spills and discharge incidents may have
contaminated onsite soil and ground water. By
1980, most of the onsite drums were sorted and
removed offsite, reused, or burned onsite.
Subsequently, contaminated soil was excavated
and placed on a plastic sterile liner, which has
degraded over time. Ground water
investigations in 1980 revealed ground water
contamination directly under the site. The
remedial actions for this site have been divided
into two Operable Units (OUs). This Record of
Decision (ROD) focuses on OU2, overall
remediation of ground water and soil/wastes
contained onsite in drums and holding basins.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other
organics; metals including arsenic, chromium,
and lead; and inorganics including asbestos.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation and onsite treatment of
1,600 cubic yards of contaminated soil using
low temperature enhanced volatilization,
followed by redeposition of the treated soil in
the excavated areas; decontaminating the
building, which includes removal, offsite
disposal, and treatment of the asbestos
insulation; excavating, treating, and disposing
of the underground tanks, tank contents,
associated equipment, liquid wastes, and
contaminated soil offsite; backfilling the
excavated area with clean soil; and pumping
and treatment of ground water using air
stripping, with carbon adsorption to control
offgasses, followed by onsite reinjection of the
treated ground water. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $16,800,00,
which includes an annual O&M cost of
$1,100,400 for years 0-10 and $701,900 for years
11-17.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No chemical-specific cleanup levels were
provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Asbestos;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Closure
Requirements; Debris; Decontamination; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Inorganics; Lead; MCLs;
81
-------
Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; VOCs; Volatilization/Soil
Aeration; Xylenes.
FAA TECHNICAL CENTER, NJ
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 5,000-acre FAA Technical Center site is 8
miles northwest of Atlantic City, in Atlantic
County, New Jersey. The site is comprised of
several installations including the Atlantic City
International Air Terminal, the Upper Atlantic
City Reservoir, and the facilities of the FAA
Technical Center. Forested land, commercial,
and residential areas are adjacent to the site.
A salvage yard (Area 2OA), located southeast
of the Atlantic City International Terminal, has
been used for storing old aircraft parts,
automobiles, scrap metal, and empty 55-gallon
drums. Soil contamination of Area 20A by
PCBs and VOCs has resulted from leaking and
deteriorating drums that have been stored
onsite. The total volume of contaminated soil
was estimated to be 930 cubic yards.
Additionally, onsite ground water has been
contaminated by VOCs leaching out of the
contaminated soil and into the shallow and
intermediate aquifers. A ground water
contaminant plume, identified during State site
investigations in 1983, is limited to the shallow
aquifer below the salvage yard area. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses soil and
ground water contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including TCE and
toluene; other organics including PCBs; and
metals including chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 930 cubic yards of
contaminated soil, temporarily storing the soil
onsite before transporting the soil off site for
rotary kiln incineration, followed by offsite
disposal of residual ash; pumping and onsite
treatment of contaminated ground water using
air stripping and emissions controls, if
necessary; reinjecting onsite the treated ground
water from the upper aquifer (located
upgradient of the contaminated area);
discharging the treated ground water from the
intermediate aquifer to an existing borrow pit
area; and continuing site access restrictions.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $6,300,000, which includes an
annual O&M cost of $86,000 for eight years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup levels
are based on SDWA MCLs or stricter State
standards, including 1,1,1-TCA 26 ug/1 (State
MCL), PCBs 0.5 ug/1 (State MCL), toluene
2,000 ug/1 (SDWA MCL) and chromium
50 ug/1 (SDWA MCL). Soil cleanup levels are
based on State action levels including PCBs
5 mg/kg for the 0 to 0.5-foot interval and
25 mg/kg for soil at greater depths.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Chromium; Clean
Air Act; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; MCLs;
Metals; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment;
O&M; Organics; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; PCBs; Plume Management; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Temporary
Storage; Toluene; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
FOREST GLEN SUBDIVISION, NY
First Remedial Action
December 29, 1989
The Forest Glen Subdivision site consists of 21
acres of developed residential properties and
undeveloped land in Niagara Falls, Niagara
County, New York. Land in the area
surrounding the Forest Glen subdivision is
used for residential and industrial purposes,
including a mobile home park, small shopping
mall, and the CECOS Landfill. Also, northwest
of the subdivision is the New Road Landfill,
which is currently under investigation by the
State. Chemical companies reportedly disposed
of wastes onsite from the early 1950s to the
early 1970s. Evidence of past waste disposal
became apparent in 1973 when utility
installation workers encountered resinous and
powder-like wastes, drums, and battery casing
parts. Residents also encountered wastes on
their properties and contacted the county,
which responded to complaints regarding drum
tops and resinous materials in June 1980. Ten
truckloads of a yellow, resin-like material were
subsequently excavated and transported to the
CECOS Landfill by the property owner at the
82
-------
time. Sampling by EPA's Field Investigation
Team revealed the presence of high
concentrations of unknown and tentatively
identified compounds (TICs) in August 1987,
and further soil sampling was conducted to
identify the TICs. EPA has executed interim
measures to stabilize site conditions including
collecting, staging, and securing drums in areas
north and east of the subdivision and
temporarily covering visibly contaminated soil
with concrete. This remedial activity is the
first of two planned operable units and
addresses resident relocation only. A
subsequent operable unit will address the
remediation of site contamination once the
relocation is complete. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
organics including PAHs; metals including lead;
and other inorganics.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes permanently relocating all Forest Glen
subdivision residents; sampling and, if
necessary, decontaminating, salvaging, or
disposing of mobile homes remaining onsite
after completion of resident relocation; and
implementing site access restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action ranges from $4,710,000 to $6,020,000,
depending on the relocation options selected.
No O&M costs are associated with this first
operable unit.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This operable unit only addresses the
permanent relocation of the residents.
Therefore, no cleanup standards or goals were
applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Inorganics; Lead; Metals; Organics;
PAHs; Relocation Soil.
GLEN RIDGE RADIUM, NJ
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 1, 1990
The 90-acre Glen Ridge Radium site is a
residential community in the Borough of Glen
Ridge, Essex County, New Jersey. The site is
adjacent to another Superfund site, the
Montclair/West Orange site. The Glen Ridge
site includes a community of 274 properties
serviced by surface reservoirs in northern New
Jersey. In the early 1900s, a radium processing
or utilization facility was located in the vicinity
of the site. It is suspected that radioactive
waste material from the facility was disposed
of in then rural areas within the community.
Some of the radioactive-contaminated soil is
believed to have been moved from the original
disposal location, used as fill material in
low-lying areas, or mixed with Portland cement
to make concrete sidewalks or foundations.
Houses were subsequently constructed on or
near the radium waste disposal areas. EPA
investigations in 1981 and 1983 confirmed the
presence of gamma radiation contamination in
the Glen Ridge area and in several adjacent
houses. Subsequently, EPA established a
quality air monitoring program to determine
the levels of radon decay products in the
contaminated houses. In 1984, EPA installed
and maintained temporary radon ventilation
systems, and gamma radiation shielding in
twenty residences. In 1985, the State excavated
contaminated onsite soil from 12 Glen Ridge
properties and disposed of the soil offsite. This
ROD complements the previous 1989 ROD for
this site and provides a final remedy. The
primary contaminant of concern affecting the
soil is radium **. The public drinking water
supply was tested and no contamination was
detected, therefore, a ground water action was
not implemented at the Glen Ridge site.
The selected interim remedial action for this
site includes excavating and disposing of
323,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and
other radium-contaminated materials from
residential and public properties, followed by
disposing of the soil offsite; filling the
excavated areas; environmental monitoring; and
continued treatment technology studies, which
may reduce the volume of materials disposed
of offsite. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action ranges from
$252,700,000 to $348,700,000, based on the
selected transportation method. There are no
O&M costs associated with this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil contaminated with concentrations greater
than radon 5.0 pCi/g of soil to a depth of 6
inches and radon 15 pCi/g in subsurface soil
will be removed and disposed of offsite.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
83
-------
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Filling; Offsite Disposal; Radioactive
Materials; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Treatability Studies.
HIGGINS FARM, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 24, 1990
The 75-acre Higgins Farm site is a cattle farm
in Franklin Township, Somerset County, New
Jersey. The site is primarily pasture land with
poor onsite drainage. Approximately 3,200
residents living within a three-mile radius of
the site rely on ground water as their drinking
water source. In 1985, after receiving reports
of ground water contamination near the farm,
the State investigated the area and found a
drum burial area. In 1986, the site owner
began to remove the drums from the site, and
ten drums were removed, crushed and placed
in a roll-off container. Later in 1986, another
50 drums were excavated, and during the
excavation, the drums were punctured and
their contents spilled onto the ground. Fluids
from the pit formed during excavation activities
were subsequently pumped to a holding tank
while excavation continued. In addition to
excavating the drums, visibly contaminated soil
was placed in roll-off containers. In late 1986,
State site inspections revealed ground water
and soil contamination by VOCs, pesticides,
metals, and dioxins. Bottled water was
temporarily provided to affected residents until
1989, when the State installed carbon filter
units on affected wells. In 1987, EPA initiated
stabilization activities at the site, including
construction of a barn to store
dioxin-contaminated material such as
overpacked drums and roll-off containers;
draining, lining, and backfilling of the
excavation pit; treatment of the pumped liquids
and storage of the treated liquids in a holding
tank; and implementing site access restrictions.
This Record of Decision (ROD) provides a
permanent safe drinking water supply source
for affected residents as part of an interim
remedy. A future ROD will address
remediation of final ground water and all
remaining onsite contamination including soil,
sediment, surface water, and ground water.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, and xylenes; other organics; and
metals including lead.
The selected interim remedial action for this
site includes developing, designing, and
constructing a water main extension and
distribution system; installing new carbon
adsorption units, as necessary; operating and
maintaining existing carbon adsorption units
until construction is completed; conducting
environmental sampling of residential wells;
removing carbon units and private well
connections once the permanent water supply
is installed; and implementing institutional
controls including ground water use
restrictions. Since the proposed remedy would
not restore ground water to beneficial use
levels, an interim ARAR waiver will be
invoked as part of this remedial action. The
total present worth cost for this remedial action
is $1,716,000, which includes a total O&M cost
of $28,200 for 2 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ARARs for drinking water are
based on SDWA MCLs and the more stringent
State standards including benzene 1.0 ug/1
(State MCL), PCE 1.0 ug/1 (State MCL), and
TCE 1.0 ug/1 (State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use restrictions will be implemented to limit
new well installation within the affected area.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; ARAR
Waiver; Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls; Interim Remedy; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Organics; PCE; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs; Xylenes.
HOOKER - 102nd STREET, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
September 26, 1990
The 22-acre Hooker - 102nd Street site is a
former industrial landfill in the city of Niagara
Falls, Niagara County, New York. The site is
adjacent to, and partially within the Niagara
River's 100-year floodplain. Surrounding land
use is industrial and residential. From 1943 to
1970, the site was used by Occidental Chemical
Corporation (formerly Hooker Chemicals and
Plastics Corporation) and Olin Corporation as
a disposal area for at least 159,000 tons of solid
and liquid industrial wastes including benzene,
chlorobenzene and hexachlorocyclohexanes. In
84
-------
1970, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
ordered landfilling operations to cease
temporarily until a bulkhead between the
landfill and the river could be constructed.
The bulkhead was completed in 1973, but
landfill operations were not resumed. In 1973,
a series of investigations were conducted by
EPA to characterize site subsurface conditions.
These studies and the Remedial Investigation
(RI) initiated in 1984, identified contamination
in ground water, onsite and offsite soil,
rivershore sediment, and within a storm sewer.
Additionally, the presence of a leachate plume
of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) was
discovered emanating from the landfill area.
This Record of Decision (ROD) is the final
remedy, which addresses all of the
contaminated media. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, TCE, and toluene; other
organics including PCBs and phenols; and
metals including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes consolidating offsite soil and lesser
contaminated sediment within the landfill area
then capping the landfill and perimeter soil;
constructing a slurry wall around the site
perimeter to contain the NAPL plume;
extracting NAPLs from the landfill and
dredging "hot spot" river sediment, transporting
sediment and leachate offsite for incineration;
dredging and dewatering remaining sediment
and consolidating them within the landfill area;
recovering ground water with an interception
drain, followed by onsite discharge to the
Niagara River or offsite treatment and
discharge to a city sewer; cleaning the storm
sewer, and placing a plastic slipliner within the
sewer; extracting and incinerating offsite
NAPLs within consolidated river or sewer
sediment; long-term ground water monitoring;
and implementing institutional controls
including deed and land use restrictions, and
site access restrictions such as fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $30,080,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $7,209,600.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup goals for ground water will be the
more stringent of Federal MCLs or State
regulated levels. Chemical-specific ground
water goals include benzene to detection limits
(State), TCE 5.0 ug/1 (State), PCBs 0.1 ug/1
(State), phenols 1 ug/1 (State), and arsenic
25.0 ug/1 (State). Sediment remedial levels will
be the solid phase concentrations necessary to
potentially exceed State Ambient Water Quality
Standards in the liquid phase.
Chemical-specific cleanup levels for sediment
include benzene 40 ug/kg, TCE 111 ug/kg, and
PCBs 42.4 ug/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Dredging; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCBs; Phenols; Plume Management;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment;
Slurry Wall; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
HOOKER CHEMICAL/RUCO POLYMER, NY
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 14-acre Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer
site is an active polymer production facility in
Hicksville, Nassau County, New York.
Surrounding land use is primarily industrial
and commercial, and a residential area is
located near the site. Since 1946, the facility
has produced various plastics, polymers and
resins, including polyvinyl chloride,
styrene/butadiene latex, vinyl chloride/vinyl
acetate copolymer, and polyurethanes. From
1956 to 1975, plant wastewater containing VOCs
and heavy metals was discharged into six
onsite ground water recharge basins, which has
led to contamination of the onsite ground
water. From 1946 to 1978, the onsite plant
utilized a heat transfer fluid that contained
PCBs. Since 1984, site investigations have
identified four onsite areas of PCB
contamination. These include a direct spill area
where releases of heat transfer fluid escaped
through a relief valve at the pilot plant, a
transport area contaminated by PCBs spread
from the direct spill area by onsite truck traffic,
the recharge basin that was contaminated by
surface runoff, and soil contamination around
an underground fuel storage tank, which was
disposed of offsite in 1989. Contaminated soil
85
-------
from the tank excavation is currently stored
onsite. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses remediation of Operable Unit 2
(OU2), the PCB-contaminated soil at the above
locations. Remediation of remaining site areas,
VOC-contaminated soil, and ground water will
be addressed as OU1 in a subsequent ROD.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and debris are PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating all soil contaminated with
greater than 10 mg/kg PCBs from the direct
spill and transport areas, and the soil from the
recharge basin to a depth of 10 feet; disposing
of approximately 1,100 cubic yards of soil
contaminated with 10 to 500 mg/kg PCBs at an
offsite landfill along with the stockpiled soil
from the earlier tank excavation; treating
approximately 36 cubic yards of soil
contaminated with PCB levels greater than
500 mg/kg offsite using incineration, followed
by offsite disposal of the residual ash; and
backfilling and paving all excavated areas,
except for the recharge basin. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$995,650. There are no O&M costs associated
with this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The excavation level, PCBs greater than
10 mg/kg, and treatment level, PCBs greater
than 500 mg/kg, are based on the TSCA Spill
Cleanup Policy and EPA's "Guidance on
Selecting Remedies for Superfund Sites with
PCB Contamination," respectively.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs;
Soil; Temporary Storage; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatment Technology.
IMPERIAL OIL/
CHAMPION CHEMICALS, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 26, 1990
The 15-acre Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals
site is an active oil blending facility in
Marlboro Township, Monmouth County, New
Jersey. Surrounding land use is primarily
residential, and several contaminated wetland
areas are located to the north of the site. Since
1912, a variety of operations have taken place
onsite, including food processing, chemical
manufacturing, and flavor and essence
production. In 1950, the plant was modified
for oil reclamation during which time used oil
was washed and distilled onsite. Residual
sludge and oily filter clay were disposed of
onsite and wash water was discharged to an
onsite settling lagoon. Wash water and used
oil were also reportedly spread on area roads
to control dust. In 3969 Imperial Oil began
onsite oil blending operations that included
mixing and repacking unused oil. Currently,
chemicals are delivered by truck and
transferred to 56 onsite above-ground tanks.
The resulting oil/water separator sludge
reportedly has been disposed of onsite near the
oily filter clay pile. Several private and State
investigations from 1981 to 1990 revealed
contamination in onsite soil and ground water,
as well as contamination by oily sludge in two
of the offsite wetland areas. Probable sources
of the contamination include leaching and
erosion of material from an onsite waste pile,
overflowing of oil/water separators, and
improper treatment of separator effluent for
arsenic. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses remediation of the contaminated
offsite wetland areas. Remediation of onsite
sources and contaminated ground water will be
addressed in a subsequent ROD. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
VOCs including benzene, toluene, and xylenes;
other organics including PAHs and PCBs; and
metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 3,700 cubic
yards of soil from the offsite wetlands area
contaminated with greater than 1 mg/kg PCBs;
temporarily storing the excavated material
onsite in a dewatering and staging area before
disposing of the material offsite in a hazardous
waste landfill; air monitoring and soil sampling;
restoring the wetlands after completion of
excavation; and controlling site access with
fencing until remediation has been completed.
A contingency for soil treatment has been
included if teachability studies determine
treatment is necessary to meet land disposal
restrictions. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $6,889,985, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $1,700 for 10
years.
86
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels for soil have been based on
State Soil Cleanup Objectives and include lead
250-1,000 mg/kg, PAHs 10 mg/kg and PCBs
5 mg/kg. The actual excavation volume of
3,700 cubic yards of soil has been based on a
PCB level of 1 mg/kg, which is designed to
account for all soil contaminated above Soil
Cleanup Objectives for any contaminant of
concern.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Contingent Remedy; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Leachability Tests; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Oils; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; RCRA;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; Temporary
Storage; Toluene; Toxic Substances Control Act;
VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
KENTUCKY AVENUE WELLFIELD, NY
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The Kentucky Avenue Wellfield site is an
inactive municipal water supply in Horseheads,
Chemung County, New York. The site is in a
low-relief area, part of which lies within a
100-year floodplain. In addition, several
wetland areas are onsite. Surrounding land use
is mixed residential, commercial, and industrial.
The site overlies the Newtown Creek Aquifer,
a major source of water in the area. The
wellfield was established in 1962, when a water
supply was needed for a food processing plant.
In 1980, elevated levels of TCE were discovered
in ground water, and the wellfield was closed.
Subsequent onsite investigations by the State
and EPA identified additional onsite
contamination by VOCs and metals. In 1985
and 1986, a removal action by EPA required
the connection of 56 homes that were served
by the wellfield to the public water distribution
system as an alternate water supply. A 1986
Record of Decision (ROD) documented the
selection of ground water monitoring,
identification of contaminant sources, and the
provision of public water to 46 additional
residences as part of the remedy for this site.
The primary source of this contamination was
determined to be from the disposal of
industrial wastes in lagoons or land areas and
from industrial spills, including ones from a
nearby Westinghouse facility. This ROD
addresses management of migration of ground
water contaminants. A subsequent ROD will
address source and final ground water cleanup
activities. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
TCE and xylenes; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes restoring the Kentucky Avenue
wellfield as a public drinking water supply
well by constructing two treatment plants, one
near the well and one between the well and
the adjacent Westinghouse facility; pumping
and treatment of ground water using filtration
to remove inorganics and air stripping/carbon
adsorption or UV-oxidation to remove organics;
disposing of any treatment residuals offsite;
discharging the treated water to the public
water supply, to surface water, or reinjecting
the treated water onsite; ground water
monitoring; and investigating an additional
possible source of onsite contamination. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $14,963,900, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $905,300 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Goals for discharge of treated ground water
were chosen as the most stringent of Federal or
State MCLs or MCLGs, or other State ground
water standards. Chemical-specific goals for
ground water include TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL),
arsenic 25 ug/1 (State), chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL), and lead 25 ug/1 (State).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act-
Closure Requirements; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Interim Remedy; Lead;
MCLGs; MCLs; Metal; O&M; Offsite Discharge;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Venting; Water Quality
Criteria; Wetlands; Xylenes.
87
-------
KING OF PRUSSIA, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 10-acre King of Prussia (KOP) site is an
abandoned waste disposal and recycling facility
in Winslow Township, Camden County, New
Jersey. The nearest residence is one mile
northeast of the site, and the nearest surface
water body is the Great Egg Harbor River,
which flows 1,000 feet southwest of the site. In
addition, an onsite swale, which directs site
runoff toward the river, has been dammed by
two fire roads resulting in the formation of
onsite wetlands. Site features include three
man-made, former lagoons, two rusting and
torn tankers on a concrete pad, and an area
with an undetermined number of buried drums
and containers. The waste recycling facility
was operated from 1970 to 1974 by the KOP
Corporation. Past waste handling and disposal
practices at the facility, as well as suspected
illegal dumping of trash and hazardous
materials after the facility closed, have resulted
in organic and inorganic contamination of site
soil, sediment, and ground water. Soil and
ground water contamination were detected by
the State in 1976, and subsequently confirmed
by EPA during site investigations conducted
from 1978 to 1982. As a result of these
investigations, buried plastic containers and
visibly contaminated soil west of the lagoons
were excavated and removed in late 1989 or
1990. However, several additional discrete
areas of contamination have been identified
including: metal-contaminated soil adjacent to
the lagoons, lagoon sludge, swale sediment,
and soil near the tankers; VOC-contaminated
soil in the drum disposal area; organic- and
metal-contaminated ground water; and possible
contamination of the surface water and
sediment in the river. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses the first operable unit for the
site, including the contaminated ground water,
soil, sediment, sludge, drums and tankers. A
future ROD will address contaminated soil
associated with the buried drum area. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, sediment, sludge, debris, and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, PCE, and
TCE; and metals including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating lagoon sludge, soil adjacent
to the lagoons, and sediment in the swale,
treating these materials using soil washing for
metals removal, and redepositing the residual
materials in their original location onsite;
excavating and disposing of buried drums,
their contents, and associated visibly
contaminated soil onsite; removing tankers for
offsite disposal; ground water pumping and
treatment using air stripping, followed by
reinjection of ground water and offsite disposal
or treatment of residuals; conducting additional
sampling and analysis of surface waters and
sediment of the Great Egg Harbor River and
soil in the buried drums area to determine the
need for further site remediation; and
implementing institutional controls including
ground water use restrictions. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$14,889,000, which includes an estimated annual
O&M cost of $285,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup objectives are based on a 10*
cancer risk to human health, an HI less than 1,
or State Action Levels and include chromium
483 mg/kg (Health-Based level), copper
3,571 mg/kg (Health-Based level), lead
500 mg/kg (State) and nickel 1,935 mg/kg
(Health-Based level). Ground water cleanup
levels are based on State and Federal MCLs,
whichever is more stringent, including PCE
1 ug/1 (State MCL), TCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL),
chromium 50 ug/1 (State MCL), copper
1,000 ug/1 (State MCL), and nickel 210 ug/1
(State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use restrictions will be implemented until
remediation goals are achieved.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Air Act; Clean Closure; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Sludge; Soil; Soil Washing; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.
-------
LONE PINE LANDFILL, NJ
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 45-acre Lone Pine Landfill site is an
abandoned, privately owned waste disposal
facility in Freehold Township, Monmouth
County, New Jersey. The site lies within a
semi-wooded wetlands area, and in the
Manasquan River floodplain. Contaminated
ground water underlies the site within the
surficial Water Table Aquifer and the deeper
Red Bank Aquifer. Ground water from both
aquifers discharges into the Manasquan River
downgradient from the site. From 1959 to
1979, municipal, commercial, and industrial
wastes, including approximately 17,000 drums
containing hazardous waste, tanks containing
liquid chemicals, and containers of chemical
sludge, were disposed of onsite. Following a
chemical fire in 1977 and an explosion at the
site in 1978, the State ordered the owner to
mitigate the potential environmental damage.
In 1979, when the owner failed to comply, the
State ordered the landfill closed, and the site
was abandoned. A 1984 Record of Decision
(ROD) addressed Operable Unit One (OU1), the
source control remedy, which included
constructing a landfill containment system;
capping the landfill; installing a slurry wall
around the landfill perimeter; and collecting
and treating leachate from within the slurry
wall containment area. This ROD addresses
OU2, contaminated ground water outside of the
containment system. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the ground water are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, phenols, TCE,
toluene, and xylenes; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and treating ground water
after installation of an interceptor drain parallel
to the Manasquan River that is keyed into the
Water Table Aquifer to capture contaminated
ground water; supplementing the drain with
extraction wells screened within the Red Bank
Aquifer; constructing an onsite wastewater
treatment plant consisting of an air stripper to
remove VOCs, precipitation/filtration for
removal of metals, and carbon adsorption to
treat recovered ground water; dewatering and
testing of residual solids to determine proper
method for offsite disposal; reinjecting the
treated ground water into the Red Bank
Aquifer or discharging into a recharge trench
onsite; conducting long-term monitoring of
ground water, surface water, river sediment
and biota; and implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions and land
and ground water use limitations. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $10,267,661, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $482,600.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals
include benzene 1 ug/1 (State MCL), PCE
1 ug/1 (State MCL), phenols 0.0035 ug/1
(State), TCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL), toluene
50 ug/1 (State MCL), xylenes 44 ug/1 (State
MCL), arsenic 50 ug/I (State MCL), chromium
50 ug/1 (State MCL), and lead 50 ug/1 (State
MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including land use, ground water use,
and deed restrictions will be implemented at
the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Leachability
Tests; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
PCE; Phenols; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria; Wetlands; Xylenes.
M&T DELISA LANDFILL, NJ
First Remedial Action - Final
September 20, 1990
The 132-acre M&T DeLisa Landfill site is
northwest of the city of Asbury Park in Ocean
Township, New Jersey. The 39-acre M&T
DeLisa landfill was operated with a State
permit from 1914 until 1974. After the landfill
was closed, a private company constructed a
shopping mall on 30 acres of the landfill. The
developer took control measures to protect
against the generation of landfill gases and
leachate. Although landfill gas is generated at
the site and slightly elevated levels of VOC
accumulation were detected on the northern
edge of the mall, sampling and analysis
indicate that the landfill is not the source of
detectable levels of VOCs in the mall. The
89
-------
developer installed storm drainage from the
parking lot to protect Deal Lake Brook, which
is the nearest surface water and is immediately
south of the mall. Onsite surface water and
ground water are not used as sources of
potable water. Site investigations and historical
research onsite activities revealed no evidence
to indicate that the landfill was used for
hazardous waste disposal. There are no
contaminants of concern affecting the site,
therefore, this is a no action Record of Decision
(ROD).
The selected remedial action for this site
includes a no further action scenario. Although
no significant contamination is present at the
site, EPA recommends that environmental
controls be implemented, including continued
surface and ground water monitoring,
restricting possible future use of onsite ground
water, continued sampling and monitoring of
the leachate collection system, replacing a gas
vent, sealing cracks in building floors and walls
in contact with subsurface soil, improving
detention ponds leading into Deal Lake Brook,
venting of the north corridor area of the mall,
and periodic indoor and outdoor air
monitoring. EPA has determined that such
actions will not be implemented under the
authority of the Superfund program, and
responsibility for the site has been transferred
to the State. There are no costs associated with
this no action remedy.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: EPA
recommends modifying the property deed to
restrict the possible use of onsite ground water.
KEYWORDS: Institutional Controls; No Action
Remedy.
MANNHEIM AVENUE DUMP, NJ
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 2-acre Mannheim Avenue Dump site is a
former municipally-owned industrial waste
landfill in Galloway Township, Atlantic County,
New Jersey. Surrounding land use is rural
residential, and many residents and facilities in
the area use ground water as their drinking
water supply. The site is adjacent to a wooded
wetland area which overlies a shallow
unconsolidated sand and gravel aquifer and a
deeper aquifer separated from the shallow zone
by a semi-permeable clay layer. Prior to 1964,
the site was used as a sand and gravel quarry.
Beginning in 1964, drummed industrial wastes,
including TCE degreasing sludge, leaded
porcelain fragments, and municipal waste were
buried onsite in 35 waste mounds. In 1982, a
State survey indicated the presence of many
unburied and leaking drums onsite. In 1984,
EPA ordered a removal action that required
cleanup of the drummed waste, including
25,000 pounds of degreasing sludge.
Subsequent sampling from 1985 to 1986
reveale-d ground water contamination onsite.
In 1989, 35 mounds of contaminated soil were
disposed of offsite. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses ground water contamination
at the site. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including benzene and TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes ground water pumping and treatment
using air stripping, with pretreatment for
removal of iron, if necessary; reinjecting the
ground water onsite with an evaluation of the
feasibility of using infiltration basins as an
alternate means of discharge; covering the
disposal area with clean fill; developing a
contingency plan for the installation of
individual carbon adsorption units on
residential wells, which may become affected
by migration of the contaminant plume;
monitoring ground and surface waters;
sampling the sediment; performing a treatability
study to investigate the need for further
treatments to remove toluene, lead, and
chromium from ground water; and determining
the need for off-gas controls on air stripper
units. The estimated present worth cost for the
remedial action is $4,217,100, which includes an
annual O&M cost ranging from $18,600 to
$394,100 based on differences in treatment and
monitoring systems over a period of 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific goals for ground water
include TCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL) and benzene
1 ug/1 (State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS:
Air Stripping; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Contingent Remedy;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Offsite
90
-------
Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; State Guidance; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Treatability Studies; VOCs;
Wetlands.
MATTIACE PETROCHEMICAL, NY
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1990
The 2-acre Mattiace Petrochemical site is an
inactive liquid storage and redistribution facility
in Glen Cove, Nassau County, New York.
Surrounding land use is primarily industrial.
The site overlies a system of three
unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers, which
may be affected by onsite contamination. From
the mid-1960s to 1986, organic solvents were
stored, blended, and repackaged onsite. Onsite
features involved with the operation included
a metal Quonset hut, a concrete fire shed, a
leaching pond, a partially covered concrete
loading dock, and 32 underground and 24
aboveground storage tanks. Drums were
reconditioned onsite, and resulting
water/solvent mixtures were discharged to
above-ground tanks or to an onsite leaching
pond. A solvent water separator was used to
collect overflow from the above-ground tanks
for discharge to the leaching pond. There is
evidence, however, that overflow from these
tanks may have been discharged directly into
the soil. In 1988, EPA characterized and
disposed of 100,000 gallons of hazardous
liquids offsite from approximately 24 above-
and 32 below-ground storage tanks. In 1989, a
second investigation identified approximately 25
buried drums and numerous other containers
that were leaking contaminated material into
the surrounding soil and ground water. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses Operable
Unit 2 (OU2) and includes removal of
drummed sludge and highly contaminated soil.
A subsequent ROD will address all remaining
sources of contamination including ground
water as OU1. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sludge, and debris
are VOCs including benzene, PCE, TCE,
toluene, and xylenes; other organics including
phenols; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating all drums, containers, and
highly contaminated soil; consolidating the
waste and overpacking drums as necessary;
containing contaminated soil, and transporting
the material offsite for treatment (possibly
incineration) and disposal. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$322,300. There are no O&M costs associated
with this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Lead; Metals; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Organics; PCE; Phenols; Sludge; Soil;
Solvents; TCE; Toluene; VOCs; Xylenes.
METALTEC/AEROSYSTEMS, NJ
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 15.3-acre Metaltec/Aerosystems site is a
former metal products manufacturing operation
in the Borough of Franklin, Sussex County,
New Jersey. A marshy wetlands area is
southeast of the site, and surrounding land use
is primarily semi-rural residential. The
Metaltec plant was operated from 1965 to 1980.
The area surrounding the plant included a
process well, a wastewater lagoon, a drum
storage area, soil saturated with wastewater,
and two piles of waste material. In 1980, the
State detected VOCs in the wastewater lagoon,
surrounding soil, and in onsite ground water.
In 1981, the State ordered
Metaltec/Aerosystems to remove waste material
from the wastewater lagoon, and in 1982 the
lagoon was partially excavated and filled. A
1986 Record of Decision (ROD) addressed the
remediation of soil, provided an alternate water
supply for nearby residents, and required a
supplemental remedial investigation/feasibility
study to determine the extent of the ground
water contamination. This ROD addresses final
ground water remediation at the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including PCE, TCE,
toluene, and xylenes; and metals including
chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes onsite ground water pumping and
treatment using precipitation, air stripping, and
91
-------
carbon adsorption, followed by discharge of the
treated water to onsite surface water; disposing
of precipitated sludge from the ground water
treatment process offsite; regenerating the spent
carbon, and disposing of the residual offsite;
and ground water monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$4^48,900, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $466300 for 10 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water goals are based
on Federal or State MCLs and include PCE
1 ug/1 (State MCL), TCE 1 ug/1 (State MCL),
toluene 2,000 ug/1 (MCL), and xylenes 44 ug/1
(State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
MONTCLAIR/WEST ORANGE RADIUM, NJ
Second Remedial Action
June 1, 1990
The 120-acre Montclair/West Orange Radium
site is comprised of 239 residential properties in
the Town of Montclair and 127 residential
properties in the Town of West Orange, Essex
County, NJ. The site is located in proximity to
the Glen Ridge Radium Superfund site. In the
early 1900s, a radium processing or utilization
facility was located near the site. It is
suspected that radioactive waste material from
the facility was disposed of in then rural areas
within the community. Some of the
radioactively-contaminated soil is believed to
have been moved from the original disposal
location, used as fill materials in low-lying
areas, or mixed with Portland cement to make
concrete sidewalks or foundations.
Subsequently, houses were constructed on or
near the radium waste disposal areas. EPA
investigations in 1981 and 1983, confirmed the
presence of gamma radiation contamination in
the Glen Ridge area and in several adjacent
houses. Subsequently, EPA established an air
quality monitoring program to determine the
levels of radon decay products in the
contaminated houses. In 1984, EPA initiated a
remedial investigation/feasibility study to
determine the nature and extent of the problem
and develop remedial alternatives for the site.
Also in 1984, the Agency installed and
maintained temporary radon ventilation
systems, and gamma radiation shielding in
twenty residences. In 1985, the State
implemented the pilot study, which included
excavating and disposing of contaminated soil
offsite from 12 Glen Ridge site properties and
several properties in Montclair. A 1989 Record
of Decision (ROD) addressed partial excavation
and offsite disposal of contaminated soil from
a number of residences as the selected remedial
action. This ROD also addresses contaminated
onsite soil, and is a final source control
remedy. A separate ground water study has
been initiated, and will be addressed in a
subsequent ROD, if necessary. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
radioactive materials, especially radium 226;
and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 323,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil (including Glen Ridge
Radium site soil, which will be remediated
concurrently) and disposing of the soil offsite;
restoring the excavated areas; and conducting
environmental monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
ranges from $252,700,000 to $348,700,000 for the
Montclair/West Orange and Glen Ridge
Radium sites combined. No O&M costs are
associated with this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All material contaminated with concentrations
of radon greater than 5.0 pCi/g of soil in the
first 6 inches, and 15 pCi/g in subsurface soil
will be excavated and removed offsite.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Excavation; Lead;
Metals; Offsite Disposal; Radioactive Materials;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations.
92
-------
MYERS PROPERTY, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 7-acre Myers Property site is a former
pesticide and industrial chemical manufacturing
facility in Franklin Township, Hunterdon
County, New Jersey. The site lies adjacent to,
and in the 100-year floodplain of the
Cakepoulin Creek which flows to the north of
the site. The site is comprised of adjourning
private lands, two acres of wetlands, and five
acres of residential property with onsite
residents. The estimated 250 people who reside
within one mile of the site use the underlying
sole-source aquifer as their drinking water
supply. From 1928 to 1959, the site was used
intermittently by several companies to
manufacture pesticides and industrial chemicals.
Improper handling by facility owners and
operators of hazardous substances including
components used to manufacture DDT and its
by-products (e.g., PCBs), and asbestos, has
resulted in onsite contamination. In 1978, State
investigations identified 20 unlabeled drums of
chemicals containing metals, DDT, other organic
chemicals in a shed, and 24 cubic yards of
asbestos material in an onsite warehouse. In
addition, surface soil and debris were found to
be contaminated with high levels of DDT, other
organics, and metals. In 1985, EPA performed
the first of two removal actions at the site,
which included repackaging the deteriorating
drums, solid DDT, lead compounds, asbestos,
soil, and debris into fifty-five gallon drums
followed by offsite disposal at a hazardous
waste landfill. In 1987, the second EPA
removal action was performed, which included
implementing site access restrictions by
installing a security fence. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses the first of two
operable units, and includes remediation of the
soil, sediment, buildings, and shallow ground
water aquifer. This ROD also addresses
interim remedial activities for the second
operable unit, the ground water in the bedrock
aquifer, which will be fully addressed in a
future ROD. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene;
other organics including PCBs, PAHs, dioxin,
and pesticides such as DDT; and metals
including arsenic and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 48,700 cubic yards of
organic- and inorganic-contaminated soil and
sediment; treating the soil/sediment using
chemical dechlorination to remove organics
followed by soil washing to remove
dechlorination process reagents, soluble reaction
by-products and metals; onsite backfilling of
treated soil; restoring designated wetlands, if
affected by the remedy; shallow and deep
ground water pumping and treatment using
ion exchange and granular activated carbon,
followed by reinjection to the aquifer, or offsite
discharge to Cakepoulin Creek; conducting an
additional study of deep bedrock ground water
to determine the need for subsequent remedial
actions; performing ground water and other
appropriate environmental monitoring; and
decontaminating onsite buildings with disposal
of contaminated debris offsite. A contingency
to this remedial action is the provision of
point-of-use treatment of residential wells
should drinking water supplies become
contaminated. The total present worth cost for
this remedial action is $45,918,000 which
includes a total O&M cost of $3,053,00 for years
0-5 and $441,000 for years 6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil and
sediment are based on State Soil Action levels
and include total DDT 10 mg/kg, total VOCs
1 mg/kg, total carcinogenic and
noncarcinogenic PAHs 10 mg/kg, arsenic
20 mg/kg, cadmium 3 mg/kg, copper
170 mg/kg, and lead 250-1,000 mg/kg.
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals
for discharge are based on Federal and State
MCLs and State Ground Water Quality Criteria
(GWQC) and include benzene 1 ug/1 (State
MCL), DDT 0.001 (State GWQC), arsenic
50 ug/1 (Federal and State MCL), and lead
50 mg/1 (Federal and State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Contingent Remedy; Debris;
Decontamination; Dioxin; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Interim
Remedy; Leachability Tests; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs;
Pesticides; Plume Management; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Sediment; Soil; Soil
93
-------
Washing/Flushing; Sole-Source Aquifer; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.
POMONA OAKS
WELL CONTAMINATION, NJ
First Remedial Action - Final
September 26, 1990
The 354-acre Pomona Oaks Well Contamination
site is comprised of a 193-residence subdivision
and an adjacent shopping center in Galloway
Township, Atlantic County, New Jersey. The
site overlies a surficial unconsolidated sand
aquifer. Home construction at the site began in
1972, and private wells within the surficial
aquifer were initially used as the water supply.
In 1982, onsite residents complained of foul
tasting well water, and subsequent
investigations from 1982 to 1985 confirmed the
presence of onsite ground water contamination.
Possible contamination sources include two
nearby gas stations, a salvage yard, a dry
cleaner, and onsite residential septic tanks. In
1985, all homes were hooked to a municipal
water supply by the State, eliminating public
exposure to ground water contamination.
Further sampling conducted from 1986 to 1990
revealed only low-level ground water
contamination. This Record of Decision (ROD)
provides a final remedy for the ground water.
Because ground water contaminant levels no
longer exceed health-based or State standards,
there are no contaminants of concern at the
site.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action, because onsite investigations
revealed that the source of contamination was
a singular event, and that the contamination
dispersed through natural attenuation and/or
biodegradation. Ground water monitoring will
be continued. No costs are associated with this
no action remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Ground Water Monitoring; No
Action Remedy.
RADIUM CHEMICAL, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
June 21, 1990
The Radium Chemical site consists of a
one-story brick building in a light
industrial/residential section in Woodside,
Queens County, New York. The Radium
Chemical Company (RCC) produced luminous
paint beginning in 1913 and later manufactured,
leased, and sold radium226 to hospitals, medical
centers and research laboratories. The radium
sources were stored onsite in lead containers in
a poured concrete vault. In 1983, the State
suspended the RCC operating license due to
disposal and safety infractions and in 1987
ordered RCC to remove the radium sources
and decontaminate the building. RCC
abandoned the building without complying
leaving a large number of radium-containing
sealed devices, some of which were suspected
of releasing radium and radon gas. Also onsite
were hundreds of containers of laboratory
chemicals. From 1988 to 1989, EPA undertook
a limited emergency removal action to secure
the facility and remove the radioactive sources.
In 1989, a Public Health Advisory was issued
for the site based on the threatened release of
radium226. This Record of Decision (ROD)
supplements the emergency removal action by
addressing the remaining residual radioactive
contamination at the site including drummed
hazardous waste contaminated with radium.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and debris are radioactive materials
including radium226 and its decay products,
including radon gas.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes partial decontamination and complete
dismantling of the contaminated building,
followed by offsite disposal of debris as
appropriate based on a contamination level;
excavation and offsite disposal of contaminated
soil and subsurface piping, followed by
replacement of piping and backfilling with
clean soil; and treatment of some
radium-contaminated hazardous waste, followed
by offsite disposal of treated and untreated
radium-contaminated hazardous wastes in
approved facilities. The estimated total cost for
this remedial action is $18,699,000. O&M costs
are included in the total cost estimate.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All soil will be excavated and disposed of
offsite that exceeds 5 pCi/g above background
94
-------
at the surface in the first six inches and
15 pCi/g above background at the subsurface
(i.e, subsequent 6-inch layers). Building
masonry with less than 5 pCi/g radium226 will
be disposed of in a sanitary landfill, masonry
exceeding this level and other material (e.g.,
steel) exceeding specific surface contamination
levels will be disposed of offsite along with the
soil at a radioactive waste disposal facility.
Chemical-specific goals for radium-contaminated
hazardous waste were not specified.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls were not specified as a component of
the selected remedy.
KEYWORDS: Clean Air Act; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Metals; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment;
Public Health Advisory; RCRA; Radioactive
Materials; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Treatment Technology.
ROEBLING STEEL, NJ
First Remedial Action
March 29, 1990
The 200-acre Roebling Steel site is a former
steel wire and cable manufacturing facility in
the village of Roebling, Florence Township,
Burlington County, New Jersey. The site abuts
the Delaware River to the north and Crafts
Creek to the east, and lies adjacent to Roebling
Park, a public playground. From 1906 to 1982,
the facility was operated primarily to produce
steel products, but in recent years, portions of
the site have been used for various other
industrial operations that have resulted in the
onsite generation, storage, or burial of raw
materials and wastes. Two removal actions
were performed as a result of these industrial
operations. In 1985, the State removed picric
acid and other explosive chemicals from one
onsite laboratory and detonated the chemicals
offsite. From 1987 to 1988, EPA performed a
second removal action which included the
offsite disposal of lab pack containers and
drums; recycling/reuse of metallic mercury, gas
cylinders, sulfuric acid, and phosphoric acid;
and onsite containment of baghouse dust and
exposed asbestos. This interim operable unit
will address those areas where contaminant
sources pose a sufficiently imminent hazard to
require expedited remediation. These areas
include the remaining drums and exterior
tanks, transformers containing
PCB-contaminated oils, a baghouse dust pile,
chemical piles, tires, and the soil under the
water tower in Roebling Park. Additional
operable units will address the remaining
sources of contamination and those areas where
contaminant migration has occurred. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and debris are organics including acids and
PCBs; metals including arsenic, chromium, and
lead; and oils.
The selected interim remedial action for this
site includes offsite incineration and disposal at
a RCRA-permitted facility of the contents of
757 drums and 67,000 gallons of
PCB-contaminated oil found in 183
transformers; dismantling and decontaminating
the transformers and disposing of the
transformer housings at a RCRA-permitted
facility; offsite disposal at a RCRA-permitted
facility of 150,000 gallons of tanked material;
offsite stabilization and disposal at a
RCRA-permitted facility of 530 cubic yards of
baghouse dust and 120 cubic yards of
excavated surface soil from Roebling Park;
offsite treatment and disposal at a
RCRA-regulated landfill of 40 cubic yards of
metal-contaminated materials from 79 chemical
piles and offsite disposal of 10,000 tires. The
estimated total cost for this remedial action is
$5,003,400. No O&M costs are associated with
this operable unit.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Surface soil under the water tower at Roebling
Park will be excavated if lead levels exceed
250 mg/kg. Because the remaining
components of the remedy involve removal of
contaminant sources to prevent additional
migration, no other specific performance goals
were given.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Incineration; Inorganics; Interim Remedy;
Leachability Tests; Lead; Metals; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Oils; Organics;
PCBs; RCRA; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization;
Temporary Storage; Toxic Substances Control
Act; Treatment Technology.
95
-------
SARNEY FARM, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 143-acre Sarney Farm site includes a
former 5-acre landfill in Amenia, Dutchess
County, New York. Land use in the area is
agricultural and includes wetlands. The site
overlies a bedrock aquifer, which is currently
used as a drinking water source.
Approximately 2,000 residences are located
within one mile of the site. In 1968, the
portion of the site that included a 5-acre
sanitary landfill was purchased by Harris
Haul-A-Way. Investigations later that year
revealed that industrial wastes including
approximately 40 drums of waste solvents were
being disposed of illegally in several onsite
areas. In 1970, the State ordered the illegal
dumping to cease. Site studies by private
parties have identified two trench areas used
for hazardous waste disposal, and acting as
localized sources of onsite soil contamination.
In both areas, soil contaminants have infiltrated
into the onsite ground water, but only in
limited amounts. Approximately 40 drums
were crushed or buried onsite in the two
disposal areas. In 1987, EPA initiated a
removal/treatment action for organic
contamination, including installing an in-situ
soil washing system at two areas. One of these
areas is addressed in this Record of Decision
(ROD). This ROD addresses the remediation
of onsite contaminated soil, debris, and ground
water in two source areas. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
debris, and grpund water are VOCs including
toluene; other organics including pesticides; and
metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing waste drums from trench
areas 2 and 4 and disposing of these offsite at
a permitted facility; treating onsite
approximately 2,365 cubic yards of
contaminated soil from the areas surrounding
the drums storage area using low temperature
thermal treatment, or if soil contamination is at
highly elevated levels, the surrounding soil
may be removed offsite and disposed of with
the drums; backfilling the excavated areas with
any onsite-treated soil; allowing for natural
attenuation of ground water; conducting
hydrogeologic studies onsite to better define the
hydrologic condition of the site; ground water
and surface water monitoring; and
implementing institutional controls including
deed restrictions. The present worth cost for
this remedial action is $907,500, which includes
an annual O&M cost of $15300 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup levels for soil are
based on risk-based levels (10s) and include
TCE 0.2 ug/1, and toluene 3.3 ug/1. These
levels are based on the maximum soil
concentrations needed to reach a 99.9%
treatment efficiency. Ground water
contaminant levels are expected to decrease
once source contamination is eliminated. The
estimated time frame for ground water
attenuation to acceptable levels is 30 years.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
ground water use at source areas.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Excavation; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Treatment; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; Pesticides;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Treatment Technology;
Toluene; VOCs.
SAYREVILLE LANDFILL, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 35-acre Sayreville Landfill site is an
inactive municipal and industrial landfill in the
Borough of Sayreville, Middlesex County, New
Jersey. The site overlies several sedimentary
aquifers, includes a tidal wetlands area, and
lies within the 500-year floodplain of the South
River, which forms the western boundary of
the site. Surrounding land use is industrial.
Beginning in 1971, the landfill was used to
dispose of municipal and hazardous wastes,
including an estimated 50 to 150 drums
containing hazardous wastes. The drums were
buried in a 20-acre area of the site. In 1977,
landfill operations ceased, but subsequent
unauthorized dumping of hazardous waste may
have occurred. In 1980, a landfill closure plan
was implemented by the borough, but was not
properly completed. In 1981, the State
excavated 30 drums containing benzene,
96
-------
pesticide-, and acid-contaminated liquids.
Investigations from 1986 to 1990, revealed
ground and surface water contamination as a
result of migration of onsite landfill
contaminants, and the data were used to
further characterize contaminant sources within
the landfill. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses remediation of onsite drummed
wastes. A subsequent ROD will address
further source remediation (leachate) and
remediation of ground and surface waters. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and debris are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes; other organics including
pesticides and phenols; acids; and metals
including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating the remaining 50 to 150
drums buried onsite, and thermally treating the
drummed waste offsite; disposing of the
residual ash offsite; installing a multi-media cap
over the landfill; constructing passive gas
collection and surface runoff control systems at
the landfill; monitoring ground and surface
waters, stream sediment, and air to determine
the need for subsequent remedial activities
and/or a leachate collection and treatment
system; and implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions such as fencing. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$16,516,600, which includes a present worth
O&M cost of $746,400 for year one, $431,800 for
years 2-5, and $354,600 for years 6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels will be based on the State
Interim Soil Action Levels (ISALs) including
arsenic 20 mg/kg (ISAL), chromium 100 mg/kg
(ISAL), and lead 250-1,000 mg/kg (ISAL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site to
restrict landfill property and ground water
usage.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation; Floodplain;
Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Treatment; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Disposal; Organics; Pesticides; Phenols; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; Toluene; Toxic Substances Control
Act; Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands;
Xylenes.
SCIENTIFIC CHEMICAL PROCESSING, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 14, 1990
The 6-acre Scientific Chemical Processing site is
a former chemical handling, treatment, and
disposal facility in Carlstadt, Bergen County,
New Jersey. The site is in a light industrial
area adjacent to an extensive salt marsh and
wetlands area, and is also considered to be
within the floodplain of tributaries to the
Hackensack River. The site is underlain by a
system of three aquifers, all of which have
been contaminated by the site. The water table
aquifer flows into a Hackensack River tributary;
the bedrock aquifer is a current drinking water
source for the vicinity. Prior to 1970, and until
its closure in 1980, a wide variety of industrial
and chemical wastes were disposed of at the
site. Many of these wastes were apparently
released onsite. In 1985, EPA required the
removal of five tanks of waste containing
numerous hazardous materials including PCBs;
and four were removed. At present, one tank
remains onsite due to the complex mixture and
high concentrations of wastes present, and the
failure to locate an appropriate treatment and
disposal facility to accept the waste. This
Record of Decision (ROD) outlines an interim
remedy for source control and management of
contaminant migration while further study is
conducted to find a suitable treatment
technology for the onsite wastes. Future RODs
will address final source and ground water
remedial activities. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil and ground water
are VOCs including benzene, PCE, phenols,
TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other organics
including PAHs, PCBs, and pesticides; metals
including arsenic, chromium, and lead; and
other inorganics.
The selected remedial action for this site is an
interim remedy, which includes installing a
slurry wall around the site perimeter to a
depth of 15 to 20 feet (corresponding to the top
of a confining clay layer); installing a
temporary infiltration barrier over the site
surface to minimize entry of precipitation;
extracting ground water from within the slurry
wall boundary for the purpose of dewatering
97
-------
onsite soil and controlling movement of
contaminated ground water away from the site;
transporting extracted ground water offsite for
pretreatment, treatment, and disposal; ground
water and surface water monitoring; and
maintaining a fence around the site. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,933,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $42,000 for 3 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels for the contaminants of concern
have not been set due to the interim nature of
this remedy. Chemical-specific ARARs will be
met for final remedies, and will be presented in
subsequent RODs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Water Act;
Deferred Decision; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Inorganics;
Interim Remedy; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Containment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE;
Pesticides; Phenols; Plume Management; RCRA;
Slurry Wall; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Monitoring; TCE; Toluene;
Treatability Studies; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
SEALAND RESTORATION, NY
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 210-acre Sealand Restoration site is a
former liquid waste disposal and storage
facility in the town of Lisbon, St. Lawrence
County, New York. Both wetland and
woodland areas are onsite. The site is
underlain by a shallow alluvial aquifer and a
deeper bedrock aquifer, which may be
hydraulically connected to one another in the
site area. Approximately 25 private wells and
one municipal well are within one mile of the
site. The municipal water system draws from
the bedrock aquifer. In 1979, supposedly
uncontaminated liquid petroleum wastes and
mineral oils were disposed of in several
locations, including a land application/disposal
area, a cell disposal area, and a drum storage
area. In 1980, the State found Sealand to be in
non-compliance by accepting contaminated
wastes, their permits were revoked, and onsite
disposal operations ceased. From 1983 to 1984,
the State conducted a remedial investigation
that identified several onsite areas of concern.
The land application area was contaminated
with PCBs as a result of improper
land spreading practices. The cell disposal area
was found to have sediment contaminated with
potentially high levels of a chemical solvent.
The drum storage area contained 200 empty or
nearly empty drums seeping tar-like residue
onsite, a tanker trailer containing less than
1,000 gallons of waste oil, and a storage tank
containing 5,000 gallons of waste oil. From
1987 to 1990, the State removed the
contaminated soil and debris and documented
these as part of this Record of Decision (ROD).
The purpose of this ROD is to review the State
action and to determine its appropriateness for
reimbursement of costs under CERCLA. A
follow-up investigation will be conducted to
determine the extent of ground water and
wetlands contamination, as well as any
remaining soil contamination. A subsequent
ROD will address these media, if deemed
necessary. The primary contaminants of
concern potentially affecting the soil and debris
are VOCs including benzene, TCE, toluene, and
xylenes; other organics including PCBs, and
pesticides; and metals including chromium and
lead.
The selected remedial action for the site,
performed by the State, was found to be
appropriate as an interim action, and included
excavating 1,445 drums and 4,762 cubic yards
of contaminated soil, along with the removal of
375,000 gallons of liquid waste from the cell
disposal area, incinerating these wastes offsite,
and disposing of residuals at a RCRA
hazardous waste facility; capping the cell
disposal area with a multi-layer cap; installing
a leachate monitoring system; removing 200
empty or nearly empty drums, 5,000 gallons of
oily waste from an above-ground storage tank,
and 1,000 gallons of waste oil from the tanker
trailer, along with the excavation and removal
of 20 cubic yards of contaminated soil all from
the drum storage area; treating and disposing
of these wastes offsite in a RCRA-permitted
Subtitle C facility; and backfilling the area with
clean soil. The estimated capital cost of this
remedial action is $20,000,000. The cost of
O&M as well as the total present worth cost
associated with the remedy have not yet been
determined.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No contaminant-specific goals were provided.
98
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Capping; Chromium;
Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Interim Remedy; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Oils; Onsite
Containment; Organics; PCBs; Pesticides; RCRA;
Soil; Solvents; TCE; Toluene; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
SOLVENT SAVERS, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 13-acre Solvent Savers site is a former
chemical waste recovery facility in Lincklaen,
Chenango County, New York. The site is
bordered by Mud Creek to the east and by an
intermittent stream to the north. Between 1967
and 1974, a variety of wastes including solids,
liquids, and sludge from a distillation process
used to recover solvents were disposed of at
the facility. Concurrently, a drum
reconditioning process was also operated onsite.
EPA and State investigations conducted from
1981 to 1982 revealed metals, VOCs, and other
organic compounds including PCBs in onsite
soil, and metals and VOCs in the ground
water. The site has been separated into five
principal source areas, which contain a total of
59,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil, 300
buried and 100 surficial drums, and 578,000,000
gallons of contaminated ground water. In 1989,
EPA required seven Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs) to conduct an extensive removal
action, which included removing and/or
treating all drums and the associated
contaminated soil. To the extent that the work
is not completed by the PRPs in a timely
fashion or to the extent that any soil
contamination will remain onsite following
completion of that work, the remedial action
documented in this ROD will be implemented.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including PCE and TCE; other organics
including carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic
PAHs, PCBs, and phenols; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 300 buried drums, followed
by treating and disposing of the drums and
associated wastes at an offsite RCRA facility;
excavating 59,000 cubic yards of contaminated
soil from two highly contaminated source areas,
followed by treating soil highly contaminated
with VOCs onsite using low temperature
thermal extraction; treating approximately 1,000
cubic yards of the excavated PCB-contammated
soil using the same thermal process or by
incinerating the soil offsite, based on the results
of a treatability study; treating soil
contaminated with low levels of VOCs using
soil flushing and/or vapor extraction processes,
based on the results of a treatability study;
treating any organic vapors from the soil
treatment using an as yet undetermined air
pollution control system; backfilling excavated
areas with treatment residuals and clean fill;
ground water pumping and treatment onsite
using chemical precipitation, air stripping, and
carbon adsorption, followed by reinjection
and/or discharge to surface water; disposing of
ground water treatment residuals offsite; and
monitoring air and ground water. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $29,350,000, which includes an
estimated annual O&M cost of $523,000 for 20
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Initial soil cleanup levels are based on an
average of model-derived cleanup levels to
prevent further contamination of ground water,
and include PCE 2.2 mg/kg, TCE 0.8 mg/kg,
toluene 1.5 mg/kg and xylenes 3.1 mg/kg.
PCB-contaminated soil will be treated to attain
the level of 1 mg/kg (TSCA PCB policy).
Chemical-specific goals for ground water are
based primarily on the more stringent of
SDWA MCLs or State standards. Cleanup
goals for over 50 contaminants are provided in
the ROD, including PCE 5 ug/1 (CLP
Quantitation Limit), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), arsenic
25 ug/1 (State), noncarcinogenic PAHs
32,340 ug/1 (health-based), and phenols
48,500 ug/1 (health-based).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Air Act; Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Offsite Disposal; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Phenols; RCRA; Safe
99
-------
Drinking Water Act, Soil; Soil
Washing/Flushing; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
SYOSSET LANDFILL, NY
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1990
The 35-acre Syosset Landfill site is a closed
municipal landfill in Syosset, Oyster Bay, New
York. Surrounding land use is high-density
residential and industrial. The site overlies a
sole-source aquifer, and eight public supply
wells are located within 3 miles of the site.
From 1933 to 1975, commercial, industrial,
residential, demolition, and agricultural wastes,
sludge, and ash were disposed of in the onsite
landfill. Typical wastes included heavy metals,
solvents, organics, oils, sludge, and metal
hydroxides. The county closed the landfill in
1975 because of suspected ground water
contamination. Subsequent studies have
confirmed ground water contamination beneath
and downgradient of the site resulting from
landfill leachate. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses source control at the site. A
subsequent ROD will address onsite ground
water contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, TCE, and
toluene; other organics; and metals including
arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes placing a geosynthetic membrane cap
over the landfill area; installing a passive gas
venting system, in addition to the venting
system installed during the 1975 landfill
closure; maintaining the cap and venting
system; conducting air and ground water
monitoring; and implementing institutional
controls including land use restrictions, and site
access restrictions including fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $26,200,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $222,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including land use restrictions will be
implemented.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Direct Contact; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Metals;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Organics; PCE;
RCRA; Soil; Sole-Source Aquifer; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; Venting;
VOCs.
VESTAL WATER SUPPLY 1-1, NY
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The Vestal Water Supply 1-1 site is located in
Vestal, Broom County, New York. The site is
on the south bank of the Susquehanna River,
and lies east of Choconut Creek. The site lies
within the floodplain of the Susquehanna River,
and contains several wetland areas. Well No.
1-1 is one of three production wells that
provide drinking water to several water
districts in the Vestal area. A State Road
Industrial Park thought to be a source of
contamination is located 1,500 feet southeast of
the Vestal Well No. 1-1. Chlorinated solvents
were first detected in Well No. 1-1 in 1978,
after a chemical spill at a plant in nearby
Endicott led to the testing of wells in the
vicinity for specific synthetic compounds.
Subsequently, contaminated ground water was
pumped from this well and discharged offsite
to the Susquehanna River. Further
investigations determined that the chlorinated
solvents present in Well No. 1-1 could not be
attributed to the chemical spill at the IBM
plant. A 1986 Record of Decision (ROD)
documented the selection of ground water
treatment using air stripping to remove VOCs,
addressed Well 1-1 contamination, and required
additional studies of four potential source areas
in the State Road Industrial Park. This ROD
addresses contaminated soil in the four source
areas and is a final remedy. This ROD also
addresses a contingency remedy for potable
water, if needed. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil are VOCs
including TCE and PCE; other organics
including PAHs; and metals including
chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes treating the soil by in-situ vacuum
extraction to remove VOCs in two of the four
source areas within the State Road Industrial
Park, followed by carbon absorption to control
air emissions; disposing of the residual carbon
100
-------
offsite; and ground water monitoring. This
ROD provides a contingency remedy for
ground water treatment using precipitation and
filtration to remove heavy metals in addition to
the current treatment, as necessary. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,700,000. There are no annual O&M
costs associated with this selected remedial
action. The estimated present worth cost for
the contingency remedy is $17,900,000, which
includes an estimated annual O&M cost of
$925,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil in the
two source areas include TCE 140 ug/kg,
1,1,1-TCA 170 ug/kg, and 1,2-DCE 188 ug/kg
(for Area 2 only).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Background Levels; Benzene;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Contingency Remedy;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLGs; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Treatment; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; TCE; Treatment Technology; Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs; Wetlands.
WOODLAND TOWNSHIP
ROUTE 72 DUMP, NJ
First Remedial Action
May 16, 1990
The 12-acre Woodland Township Route 72
Dump site is an abandoned hazardous waste
dump in Woodland Township, Burlington
County, New Jersey. The site is being
remediated concurrently with another
abandoned dump, the 20-acre Woodland
Township Route 532 Dump site, located 3 miles
from the Route 72 site. Both sites are in the
Pinelands Preservation Area District of New
Jersey. Several chemical manufacturing firms
dumped chemicals and other wastes into
trenches and lagoons or burned the waste at
the sites from the early 1950s to 1962. An
estimated total of 54,000 cubic yards (Route 72,
28,000 cubic yards; Route 532, 26,000 cubic
yards) of surface material including surface soil,
stream sediment, sludge, and debris at the sites
are contaminated with wastes including tarry
substances and paint residues. Furthermore,
leaching from surface materials has resulted in
the contamination of 300,000 cubic yards (Route
72, 130,000 cubic yards; Route 532, 170,000
cubic yards) of subsurface soil and ground
water beneath both sites. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses surface material and
ground water remediation at both sites. A
subsequent ROD will address subsurface soil.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the surface soil, sediment, sludge, debris, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, TCE and xylenes; organics including
PAHs, pesticides, and phenols; radionuclides
(e.g., uranium and thorium series); and metals
including lead and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation, further characterization,
and offsite disposal at a permitted facility of
54,000 cubic yards (total from both sites) of
contaminated surface soil, sludge, debris and
sediment; offsite disposal of 19 cubic yards
(total from both sites) of radiologically
contaminated surface materials including a
drum of radioactive pellets; ground water
pumping and treatment with treatment to be
determined during design (but anticipated to
include air stripping, metals removal, biological
treatment, and advanced oxidation or carbon
adsorption) and reinjection of treated ground
water; and ground and surface water
monitoring. The total estimated present worth
cost for the concurrent remedial actions at the
Route 72 and Route 532 sites is $142,200,000,
which includes an estimated present worth
O&M cost of $114,000,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup objectives have been based
primarily on State standards and background
levels including total VOCs 1 mg/kg, total
chromium 100 mg/kg, pesticides (DDT and
metabolites) 10 mg/kg, and lead
250-1,000 mg/kg (based on State risk
assessment). Ground water nondegradation
remedial goals are based on natural
background levels for the Pine Barrens area
including benzene 0.88 ug/1, pesticides (DDT
and metabolites) 0.001 ug/1, toluene 1.2 ug/1,
TCE 0.38 ug/1, total xylenes 1.0 ug/1, and
phenols 0.15 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
101
-------
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Background Levels; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Pesticides; Phenols;
Radioactive Materials; RCRA; Sediment; Sludge;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies;
VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
WOODLAND TOWNSHIP
ROUTE 532 DUMP, NJ
First Remedial Action
May 16, 1990
The 20-acre Woodland Township Route 532
Dump site is an abandoned hazardous waste
dump in Woodland Township, Burlington
County, New Jersey. The site is being
remediated concurrently with another
abandoned dump, the 12-acre Woodland Route
72 Dump site, located 3 miles from the Route
532 site. Both sites are in the Pinelands
Preservation Area District of New Jersey.
Several chemical manufacturing firms dumped
chemicals and other wastes into trenches and
lagoons or burned the waste at the sites from
the early 1950s to 1962. An estimated total of
54,000 cubic yards (Route 72, 28,000 cubic
yards; Route 532, 26,000 cubic yards) of surface
material including surface soil, stream sediment,
sludge, and debris at the sites are contaminated
with wastes including tarry substances and
paint residues. Furthermore, leaching from
surface materials has resulted in the
contamination of 300,000 cubic yards (Route 72,
130,000 cubic yards; Route 532, 170,000 cubic
yards) of subsurface soil and ground water
beneath both sites. Contaminated ground
water discharges to a cranberry bog and an
adjacent bog reservoir. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses surface material and ground
water remediation at both sites. A subsequent
ROD will address subsurface soil. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the surface
soil, sediment, sludge, debris, and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, TCE,
toluene, and xylenes; organics including PAHs,
pesticides, and phenols; radionuclides (e.g.,
uranium and thorium series); and metals
including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation, further characterization,
and offsite disposal at a permitted facility of
54,000 cubic yards (total from both sites) of
contaminated surface soil, sediment, sludge,
and debris; offsite disposal of 19 cubic yards
(total from both sites) of radiologically
contaminated surface materials including a
drum of radioactive pellets; ground water
pumping and treatment with treatment to be
determined during design (but anticipated to
include air stripping, metals removal, biological
treatment, and advanced oxidation or carbon
adsorption) and reinjection of treated ground
water; and ground and surface water
monitoring. The total estimated present worth
cost for the concurrent remedial actions at the
Route 72 and Route 532 sites is $142,200,000,
which includes an estimated present worth
O&M cost of $114,000,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup objectives have been based
primarily on State standards and background
levels including total VOCs 1 mg/kg, total
chromium 100 mg/kg, pesticides (DDT and
metabolites) 10 mg/kg, and lead 250 to
1,000 mg/kg (based on State risk assessment).
Ground water nondegradation remedial goals
are based on natural background levels for the
Pine Barrens area including benzene 0.88 ug/1,
pesticides (DDT and metabolites) 0.001 ug/1,
toluene 1.2 ug/1, TCE 0.38 ug/1, total xylenes
1.0 ug/1, and phenols 0.15 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Background Levels; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Pesticides; Phenols;
Radioactive Materials; RCRA; Sediment; Sludge;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Surface
Water Monitoring; Toluene; Treatability Studies;
VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
102
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 3
(Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia)
ARMY CREEK LANDFILL, DE
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1990
The Army Creek Landfill site, a former sand
and gravel quarry, is approximately two miles
southwest of New Castle, Delaware. The site
abuts Army Creek/Pond and high quality
wetlands to the south and east and lies
adjacent to Delaware Sand & Gravel Landfill,
another Superfund site. From 1960 to 1968,
when the landfill reached capacity and closed,
the 44-acre municipal landfill accepted
approximately 1.9 million cubic yards of
municipal and industrial wastes. Ground water
problems first became apparent in 1971, when
a residential well downgradient of the site
developed water quality problems. Since 1972,
EPA, the State, and the county have continued
to sample the ground water and have identified
ground water contaminants indicative of
hazardous waste disposal. A contaminant
plume has also been identified downgradient of
the landfill. In 1973, the county installed
recovery wells to intercept the contaminant
plume and to create a ground water divide
between the Army Creek Landfill and nearby
potable water supply wells. A 1986 Record of
Decision (ROD) provided for capping of the
landfill and for the continued operation of the
recovery well network to maintain the ground
water divide. The extracted ground water
currently discharges untreated into Army
Creek/Pond. This ROD, the second of two
operable units, addresses the need to treat the
recovered ground water prior to onsite
discharge into Army Creek/Pond. The primary
contaminant of concern with respect to the
impact of discharge to surface water is iron.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes ground water pumping using the
recovery well network and treatment using a
modified conventional precipitation water
treatment plant which involves aeration,
precipitation, sedimentation, and filtration
followed by onsite discharge of the effluent to
Army Creek/Pond; sampling and offsite
disposal of the sludge generated during the
treatment process; and monitoring of the
sediment, recovered ground water, surface
water, and wetlands. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $4,900,000,
which includes an annual O&M cost of
$294,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The recovered ground water will meet State
water quality criteria prior to onsite discharge
into Army Creek/Pond. Chemical-specific
goals include iron 1,000 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Monitoring; Wetlands.
AVTEX FIBERS, VA
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 440-acre Avtex Fibers site is a former
synthetic fibers manufacturing facility in Front
Royal, Warren County, Virginia. The site is
bounded by the South Fork of the Shenandoah
River to the west and northwest, and by
residential areas to the south, northeast, and
east. A section of the site lies within the
100-year Shenandoah River floodplain. The
plant produced rayon (1940-1989), polyester
(1970-1977), and polypropylene fibers
(1985-1989). Until 1983, the by-products,
including sodium cellulose xanthate-based
viscose waste and zinc hydroxide sludge, were
disposed of onsite in unlined surface
impoundments or landfills. Subsequently, the
waste was routed to an onsite wastewater
treatment facility. Fly ash (from incinerator
exhaust air pollution control devices) and boiler
house solids were disposed of in four other
surface impoundments and one fly ash waste
pile. In 1982, a State investigation identified
carbon disulfide, a constituent of viscose waste,
in residential wells located across the river
from the plant. In 1983 and 1984, in response
to the result of this investigation, Avtex
implemented interim measures to address this
ground water contamination by purchasing 23
subdivision properties in the area with
103
-------
contaminated ground water, providing an
alternate water supply to permanent residents,
and implementing a ground water pumping
and treatment program. A 1988 Record of
Decision (ROD) addressed further remediation
of ground water and dewatering of 3 onsite
viscose basin surface impoundments. In 1989,
State site investigations identified PCB
contamination in the soil and in Shenandoah
River fish. This contamination may have been
the result of a transformer explosion, general
maintenance practices within the facility's
polyester drying area, and subsequent discharge
of PCB-contaminated wastewater from the
plant's sewer system to the Shenandoah River.
In October 1989, EPA issued an Administrative
Order (AO) to the site owners, Avtex Fibers
Inc., requiring PCB cleanup and identification
and disposal of drummed wastes present
onsite. The State revoked the plant's NPDES
permit, and Avtex subsequently ceased
operations. In 1989, EPA initiated a removal
action to stabilize the drummed wastes. In
1990, EPA issued another AO and the former
site owners took over the maintenance of
freeboard in sulfate basins and the continuation
of wastewater treatment onsite. This ROD
addresses the removal of PCB-contaminated
soil, breakdown of the acid reclamation facility,
and the disposal of drummed wastes thought
to contain oils, bases, acids, solvents, and PCBs.
Also, this ROD addresses site security, control,
maintenance, and health and safety measures.
A subsequent ROD will address possible
remediation of remaining contamination of
onsite structures, surface water, sediment,
ground water, sewer system, and waste
disposal areas. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and debris are
organics including PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation and offsite disposal of
approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil
contaminated with PCB levels exceeding
10 mg/kg, followed by restoration of excavated
areas; identification of drum contents, treatment
and offsite disposal of drum contents that are
RCRA wastes; decontaminating and recycling or
crushing the empty drums followed by
incineration or disposal in a RCRA landfill;
dismantlement of the unstable acid reclamation
facility with decontamination, as necessary; and
disposing of unusable rubble and machinery
onsite. Drums containing nonhazardous
substances will remain onsite and available for
liquidation by the corporate trustee upon EPA's
approval. The fourth component of this ROD
is site security, maintenance, control, and health
and safety measures. The estimated capital
cost for this remedial action is $8,708,400.
There are no O&M costs associated with this
remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels for PCB-contaminated soil are
based on EPA published guidance on
"Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites with
PCB Contamination." The recommended action
level for industrial land use soil is PCB
10-25 mg/kg. For this site, all soil in excess of
10 mg/kg of PCB will be removed.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Decontamination; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment;
Oils; Onsite Disposal; Organics; PCBs; RCRA;
Soil; Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
Toxic Substances Control Act; Treatment
Technology.
BROWN'S BATTERY BREAKING, PA
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 14-acre Brown's Battery Breaking site is an
inactive lead-acid battery processing facility in
Tilden Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania.
The area surrounding the site is primarily
agricultural with scattered rural residences.
The site is bordered by Conrail tracks, Mill
Creek, and the Schuylkill River. The site lies
within the 100-year floodplain of the Schuylkill
River. From 1961 to 1971, the facility recovered
lead-bearing materials from automobiles and
truck batteries by breaking the battery casings,
draining the acid, and recovering the lead alloy
grids, plates, and plugs. During this time, the
crushed casings were used as a substitute for
road gravel or disposed of onsite. The State
conducted onsite and offsite investigations
during the 1980s that identified lead
concentrations in excess of acceptable limits in
residents, livestock, soil, and surface waters. A
1983 EPA investigation revealed extensive lead
contamination in onsite soil and sediment
located in the Schuylkill River. As a result of
the investigation, EPA initiated an Immediate
Removal Request to relocate three families and
to excavate and consolidate 13,000 cubic yards
104
-------
of contaminated soil and battery casings into an
onsite containment area, that was covered with
a low permeability cap. A second removal,
initiated in 1990, consisted of temporarily
relocating all onsite residents. The cleanup
strategy for the site consists of three operable
units: site access; remediation of onsite soil and
battery casings; and ground water remediation.
This Record of Decision addresses site access;
subsequent actions will address soil and
ground water remediation. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil and
sediment is lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes permanently relocating all onsite
residents and businesses to compatible offsite
locations; decontaminating personal belongings,
as appropriate; and implementing site access
restrictions including fencing and institutional
controls including deed restrictions. The
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$342,900. There are no O&M costs associated
with this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
There are no chemical- specific ARARs for this
operable unit. The initial remedy will eliminate
human contact with the soil and sediment. Site
use and access restrictions will reduce the
potential for transport of contaminants offsite.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
future residential and industrial use of the site.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; Public
Exposure; Relocation; Sediment; Soil.
BUTZ LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The Butz Landfill site is an inactive landfill in
Jackson Township, Monroe County,
Pennsylvania. The sole-source aquifer
underlying the site supplies drinking water for
the vicinity, which includes approximately 3,300
people who live within three miles of the site
and an additional 3,000 people during tourist
seasons. Beginning in 1965, municipal waste,
sewage sludge/liquids, and possibly some
industrial wastes were accepted at the landfill.
During the years the landfill was operated, the
waste was disposed of without a State permit.
In 1971, onsite investigations revealed well
water contamination and the presence of
leachate seeps. By 1973, the State ordered the
landfill closed and required that corrective
measures be taken, including the development
of a surface water management plan, ground
water monitoring, and placement of a cover
over the landfill. Additional onsite
investigations in 1986 revealed high TCE levels
in domestic wells to the south of the landfill,
which prompted a request to EPA that the site
be considered for emergency action. In 1986,
the State and EPA initiated emergency response
activities, including additional sampling,
installing water coolers, and supplying bottled
water or carbon filters to homes with
contaminated well water. This Record of
Decision addresses the first Operable Unit
(OU), which establishes an alternate water
supply. Subsequent OUs will address
remediation of the contaminated soil, surface
water, and ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs, including PCE and TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes construction of new water service
lines and replacement of pumps, valves, and
drinking water storage tanks; connection of
new water supply wells to approximately 49
residences; and construction of access roads, as
required. The total cost for this remedial
action is $5,910,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $23,000 for 50 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals were not
provided because this remedial alternative will
not address ground water contamination but
rather will mitigate and/or prevent human
exposure to currently used contaminated
ground water. The selected alternative will
provide potable water that will meet SDWA
MCLs. Water from the water supply system
will meet State standards.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; MCLs; O&M; PCE; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source Aquifer; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs; Wetlands.
105
-------
C & R BATTERY, VA
First Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1990
The 11-acre C & R Battery site is a former
battery-sawing and shredding facility in
Chesterfield County, Virginia. Open fields and
woods border the site on the north, south, and
west, a small fuel oil distributor borders the
site on the east, and the James River is
approximately 650 feet north of the site. From
the early 1970s to 1985 the facility was used to
recycle discarded batteries. Site operations
included draining battery acids into onsite
ponds, recovering and stockpiling lead and lead
compounds from the batteries, and shredding
and stockpiling battery casings onsite. The
State began monitoring the site in the late
1970s and detected elevated lead levels in the
soil, surface water, and ground water. An
OSHA inspection revealed indoor air levels of
lead to be more than twice the OSHA
standards of 50 ug/m3. Also, facility
employees were found to have elevated lead
levels in their blood. In response to public
health concerns, EPA conducted a removal
action in 1986, which included extracting acidic
liquid from onsite lagoons and raising the pH
level of the liquid before discharging the
neutralized liquid into onsite ditches. Lagoon
sludge was neutralized and returned to the
lagoon, and surface soil was also neutralized.
In addition, shredded battery casings, soil, and
debris found east of the drainage ditch, were
consolidated into two debris piles and remain
onsite. This remedial action addresses the
former acid pond area, the debris piles, and a
drainage ditch. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris, and
surface water are metals including lead and
arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes the demolition of a concrete pad and
dismantlement of a storage shed followed by
offsite disposal of the debris, and offsite
treatment, if necessary, of surface water from
the drainage ditch prior to the excavation of
contaminated soil and sediment; excavation and
stabilization of approximately 36,800 cubic
yards of contaminated soil, sediment, and
debris piles followed by offsite disposal in a
permitted landfill; backfilling of all excavated
areas; soil cover over all areas with lead
contamination above background; hybrid
closure (soil cover) for residual contamination
of lead-contaminated soil outside the acid pond
area; clean closure of the acid pond area; offsite
treatment and disposal of 350 batteries; ground
and surface water monitoring; and
implementing institutional controls including
site use restrictions. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is
$15,572,000, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $14,550.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil will be excavated if the soil contaminants
exceed established action levels, which are
based on a 10^ risk level and include lead
1,000 mg/kg and arsenic 10 mg/kg. Accidental
ingestion route of exposure will be eliminated.
Sediment will be excavated if sediment
contaminants exceed action levels, which were
derived from a Puget Sound Estuary Program
study, and include lead 450 mg/kg and arsenic
57 mg/kg. By remediating the soil and
sediment to these levels, exposure via
inhalation of suspended particulates should also
be acceptable. The soil action levels will
remove the threat of ground water
contamination.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be used to control future site use.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Closure;
Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water Monitoring; Hybrid/Alternate Closure;
Institutional Controls; Leachability Tests; Lead;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; RCRA; Sediment; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
COKER'S SANITATION SERVICE
LANDFILLS, DE
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills site is
comprised of two inactive landfills, the 10-acre
landfill #1 and the 15-acre landfill #2, located
approximately 0.5 miles apart, in Kent County,
Delaware. Landfill #1 is bordered to the north
by a forested wetland that includes a shallow
stream known as the Willis Branch of the
Lepisc River. Land use in the area is primarily
agricultural and residential. Each landfill
contains approximately 45,000 cubic yards of
106
-------
latex sludge waste in addition to the
contaminated soil/waste. From 1969 to 1977,
latex rubber waste sludge was disposed of at
Landfill #1 into unlined trenches, which were
topped off with local soil when nearly filled
with sludge. From 1976 to 1980, latex sludge
was also disposed of in lined trenches at
Landfill #2. The landfill operating permit
required a leachate collection and treatment
system and a ground water monitoring system
to be installed. Subsequently, the latex sludge
waste in both landfills gradually settled and
compacted reducing permeability and
minimizing the amount of leachate from the
site. Excess levels of styrene and ethylbenzene
were found in the waste trenches of both
landfills and in the leachate collection system of
landfill #2. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses contamination in both landfills and in
the leachate collection system at Landfill #2.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and sludge are VOCs including
benzene and metals.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes covering the seeps at Landfill #1;
backfilling depressed areas of Landfill #2 and
sealing the Landfill #2 leachate collection
system; monitoring ground and/or surface
water; and implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions on land use and site
access restrictions. The estimated total cost for
this remedial action is $653,000, with total
O&M costs of $527,257.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific goals are not applicable, since
this remedial action uses no treatment
technologies. The remedial activities will
reduce the cancer risk level to less than 10"6,
and the Hazard Index to less than 1.0.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions limiting future land use will be
implemented at both landfill properties.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Metals;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Sludge; Soil; Surface
Water Monitoring; VOCs.
CROYDON TCE, PA
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1990
The Croydon TCE site is in Bristol Township,
Bucks County, Pennsylvania. A series of
studies conducted by EPA beginning in 1984
led to the detection of VOC contamination in
the ground water over a 3.5-square mile area
referred to as the study area. The study area
is predominantly residential with an estimated
3,000 residents. A small southeastern portion
of the study area containing elevated levels of
VOCs, particularly TCE, and numerous
potential source areas have been identified and
are referred to collectively as the "focused area
of investigation." This smaller area is
composed of the Croydon residential
community and several manufacturing and
commercial establishments. The study area is
bordered on the south by the Delaware River.
Neshaminy Creek, which borders the study
area to the west, and Hog Run Creek, which
flows through the focused area of investigation,
both discharge to the river. Although the
source of contamination has not been identified,
the contaminant plume appears to be flowing
south-southeast into the East Branch of Hog
Run Creek and probably into the Delaware
River. A 1988 Record of Decision (ROD)
documented the provision of a public water
supply to 11 residents within the identified
ground water contaminant plume area. This
1990 ROD addresses remediation of the ground
water contamination at the site. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including TCE and 1,1-DCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes ground water pumping and onsite
treatment using air stripping, followed by
carbon adsorption as an ancillary treatment step
before onsite discharge of the treated ground
water; vapor-phased carbon adsorption
treatment of air stripper exhaust, followed by
offsite disposal or treatment of spent carbon;
implementation of institutional controls to
prevent the use of contaminated ground water
during remediation; and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $1,345,000, which
includes an estimated annual O&M cost of
$46,709 for 45 years (i.e., assuming that the
State ARARs of remediating ground water to
background levels are to be met by extending
treatment from 30 to 45 years).
107
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The ground water remedy is designed to
contain further migration of the plume while
attempting to restore ground water to the State
ARAR of background levels, including TCE
1 ug/1 and 1,1-DCE 1 ug/1 (assuming no
additional release of contaminants to the
aquifer). However, because the source of
ground water contamination has not been
identified, a permanent solution may not be
achieved.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: State and local
authorities will implement institutional controls,
including ground water use restrictions, in the
affected area to prevent the use of
contaminated ground water during remediation.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Background
Levels; Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
MCLs; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
CRYO-CHEM, PA
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 19-acre Cryo-chem site is a metal
fabricating facility in Worman, Earl Township,
Berks County, Pennsylvania. A woodland area
is located northeast of the site, and an onsite
stream has been identified west of the
contaminant area. Between 1970 and 1982,
chemical solvents were used at the facility at a
rate of two to three 55-gallon drums per year.
During this time, a chemical spill occurred at
Cryo-chem, but cannot be definitely linked to
the source of contamination. Well sampling
conducted during 1985 and 1987 showed
ground water contamination in monitoring and
residential wells within 1 mile of the site,
which led to a removal action that required the
installation of activated-carbon filter units in 14
affected homes. In 1989, a Record of Decision
(ROD) was signed for Operable Unit One
(OU1), which provided for the installation of a
new water supply well outside of the
contaminant plume and hookups for all affected
and potentially affected residents. This ROD
addresses OU2, the treatment of the ground
water and containment of the contaminant
plume. A subsequent ROD will address
remediation of the source of the contamination
onsite (OU3). The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including PCE, TCE, DCA, DCE, and TCA.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and treatment of ground
water using air stripping, followed by carbon
adsorption, if emissions are above Clean Air
Act levels, with onsite discharge of treated
water to surface water; other discharge options
will be considered as necessary, including
offsite discharge to a downstream wastewater
treatment facility or reinjection at the site,
depending on the discharge rate; and ground
water and surface water monitoring. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,065,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $75,200 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will be remediated to meet
SDWA MCLs, or to an excess cancer-risk level
of 10"6 or less, if no current MCL exists for a
particular contaminant. Specific goals for
ground water include DCE 0.007 mg/1 (MCL),
PCE 5 ug/1 (proposed MCL), TCA 0.2 mg/1
(MCL), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL). Surface water must
meet Clean Water Act Federal Water Quality
Criteria (FWQO including PCE 0.8 ug/1
(FWQC) and TCE 2.7 ug/1 (FWQC) for both
water and fish ingestion.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: No institutional
controls are planned at this time. However,
future need for these restrictions will be
determined at the five-year review.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Onsite Discharge;
PCE; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
108
-------
DOVER AIR FORCE BASE, DE
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 3,734-acre Dover Air Force Base site is an
active military base in Dover, Kent County,
Delaware. Surrounding land use is primarily
agricultural/residential, and wetlands associated
with stream floodplain areas are located onsite.
Since 1941, the base has operated as a military
air field and has served several different
functions including present day cargo
operations. Hazardous waste has been
generated at the base from industrial
operations, fuels management, fire training, and
pesticide use. These wastes have been handled
in various manners since 1941, including
disposal in onsite landfills and pits, use in fire
training exercises, and discharge to surface
drainage ditches. A 1.3-acre area referred to as
Fire Training Area #3 (FT-3), located in the
northeastern portion of the site, was used to
conduct fire training exercises, and currently
contains several waste pits, an oil/water
separator, dumpsters, and an underground
storage tank used during the exercises. From
1962 until 1970, contaminated waste oils and
fuels were placed on an old aircraft or spread
in a pit and ignited for fire training exercises
in FT-3. Approximately 1,000 gallons of waste
material were used per exercise, with two
exercises being performed each week. In 1970,
the original pit was filled in, and a new pit
was excavated. Metal dumpsters were placed
in the pit and waste JP-4 fuel was ignited on
them during quarterly training exercises.
Drainage from the pit was collected in an
underground oil/water separator, and was
removed from the site by a waste oil recovery
contractor. An underground storage tank, used
to store JP-4 fuel used in the exercises, and
underground pipes, also are located near the
pit. Fire training exercises ceased in 1989.
Investigations in 1989 by Dover Air Force Base
revealed the presence of contaminated soil in
the pit area. Residual waste fuel, oil, and
sludge still remain in underground piping,
creating a fire and explosion hazard. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
remediation of soil and structures within the
FT-3 area. Subsequent RODs will address other
sources of contamination and contaminated
ground water in other site areas. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sludge, and debris are VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and xylenes; metals including
lead; and oils.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing residual liquids, sludge, and
solids from the underground tank, oil/water
separator, and piping, and transporting these
materials offsite for disposal; excavating the
underground tank, oil/water separator,
dumpsters, and piping, and decontaminating
them using high-temperature steam cleaning
equipment; disposing of the contaminated
steam cleaning solution and excavated debris
and structures offsite; backfilling and grading
excavated areas; and placing a revegetated soil
cover over the FT-3 area. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$100,000, which includes a total O&M cost of
$5,000 over 20 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals were not
provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain; Landfill Closure; Lead; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Oils; Onsite Disposal;
RCRA; Sludge; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
EAST MX. ZION, PA
First Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1990
The 10-acre East Mt. Zion site is a privately
owned, inactive landfill in Springettsbury
Township, York County, Pennsylvania. The
landfill is on a forested ridge along with
recreational park lands and a residential
subdivision. From 1955 to 1972, domestic,
municipal, and industrial wastes were disposed
of onsite. In 1969 and 1971, the landfill was
cited for improper disposal practices and was
subsequently closed by the State in 1972. In
1983 and 1988, State investigations identified
several contaminants in onsite ground water
and leachate. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses the ground water contamination by
inhibiting the mobility of contaminants from
the landfill. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including vinyl chloride and benzene.
109
-------
The selected remedial action for this site
includes capping the landfill with an
impermeable multi-layer cap; constructing a
passive vent system to control methane
offgasses; installing surface water control
systems for the cap; allowing natural
attenuation to reduce ground water
contamination to background levels; conducting
ground water monitoring to monitor natural
attenuation of contaminants; and implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions,
and site access restrictions, such as fencing.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $2,230,000, which includes an
annual O&M cost for ground water monitoring.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Based on ground water velocity and the
elimination of the source, ground water
concentrations are expected to meet background
levels within five years through natural
attenuation. Chemical-specific goals for ground
water include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), and vinyl
chloride 2 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to limit site
usage.
KEYWORDS: Background Levels; Benzene;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Onsite Containment; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; Venting; VOCs.
FIKE CHEMICAL, WV
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 11.9-acre Fike Chemical site is an
abandoned chemical manufacturing facility in
Nitro, West Virginia. The site is comprised of
an 11-acre chemical plant and a 0.9-acre
Cooperative Sewage Treatment plant (CST).
Onsite features include several chemical
production areas, process control equipment,
various onsite structures, drum and waste
burial areas, over 400 storage tanks, and 3
inactive waste lagoons. During operating years,
the CST facility treated the sewage and
industrial wastewater generated by the chemical
manufacturing processes and onsite truck
terminal operations. The CST facility currently
treats contaminated storm water generated
onsite. From 1951 to 1988, Fike Chemical
manufactured more than sixty different
chemicals. Hazardous wastes generated from
onsite operations were discharged onsite to the
nearby Kanawha River. In 1983, EPA identified
onsite dioxin-contaminated soil. In addition,
asbestos was found in several onsite structures
and was used as insulation for onsite pipes,
tanks, and cooling towers. A 1988 Record of
Decision (ROD) addressed the disposal of bulk
chemicals stored in onsite tanks and drums. In
1989, an Explanation of Significant Differences
modified the 1988 ROD, documenting that
drum contents would not be consolidated prior
to disposal. In 1990, a Focused Feasibility
Study (FFS) was completed by EPA to evaluate
remedial alternatives for the tanks, equipment,
and structures. This ROD addresses the tanks,
equipment, and structures evaluated in the 1990
FFS report. Future RODs will address other
onsite areas of concern including contaminated
soil and sludge. The primary contaminants of
concern contained in the waste/debris include
organics and asbestos.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing 5.5 tons of onsite asbestos
material from various site areas; dismantling
and decontaminating 400 onsite storage tanks,
approximately 130 pieces of equipment, and 39
buildings and disposing of the debris offsite;
treating and if necessary, discharging the
decontamination fluids; and implementing site
access restrictions including fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,830,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $5,200 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Any tanks, equipment, or structure identified as
a safety hazard and health risk and/or an
obstacle to future investigation will be
dismantled, decontaminated, if necessary, and
removed to an offsite facility for disposal or
salvaging. Any waste, which cannot be treated
onsite will be removed to an offsite facility for
treatment.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Asbestos; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Debris; Decontamination; Direct Contact; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; RCRA;
State Standards/Regulations.
110
-------
GREENWOOD CHEMICAL, VA
First Remedial Action
December 29, 1989
The five-acre Greenwood Chemical site is a
former chemical plant in Newton, Virginia.
Adjoining lands to the east, west, and south
are used for rural, residential, and agricultural
purposes, and the Blue Ridge Mountain Range
bounds the site to the north. Ground water is
used by all persons within a three-mile radius
for drinking water purposes. The closest
residential well is within 400 feet of the site,
and the closest downgradient well is
approximately 2,500 feet from the site. The
chemical plant was used primarily for the
production of industrial, pesticide,
pharmaceutical, and photographic products
from 1947 until 1985, and produced waste
solvents including listed RCRA F002 and F005
wastes. Plant operations were terminated in
April 1985, after a toluene fire killed four
employees. Contaminated areas at the site
include seven lagoons used to store
wastewaters generated during plant operations,
and a buried drum area. To mitigate threats
due to contamination, EPA emergency response
activities were conducted between 1987 and
1988. These activities included removing
surface drums and other stored chemicals;
excavating lagoon sludge from three lagoons
and stabilizing the underlying soil before
disposing of the treated soil onsite in a lined
vault constructed in one of the lagoons; and
capping a lagoon. This operable unit addresses
approximately 1.5 acres of the most
contaminated portions of the site including the
contaminated soil associated with three of the
former lagoons, a backfilled lagoon now
referred to as the backfilled area, and contained
chemicals in the buildings. A second operable
unit will address the remainder of the site
including additional soil and sediment, and
ground water underlying and downgradient of
the contaminated soil. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, and TCE; other
organics including PAHs; metals including
arsenic; and other inorganics including cyanide.
The selected remedial action for this operable
unit includes excavation and offsite incineration
of approximately 4,500 cubic yards of
contaminated soil, backfilling with clean soil,
and revegetating; removal of chemicals stored
in onsite buildings; and surface water
collection/diversion during remedy
implementation. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $8,787,900.
There are no O&M costs associated with the
remedial action for this operable unit.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminated soil will be excavated to levels
where leachate contamination will not raise
ground water levels above the associated
MCLs, WQC, or health-based criteria. For
individual contaminants in the soil, the cleanup
goals and associated target criteria include
benzene 0.83 mg/kg, TCE 0.13 mg/kg, PCE
0.07 mg/kg, and PAH 5,000 mg/kg. The
cleanup level for arsenic was set at 25 mg/kg,
based on a non-lethal excess lifetime cancer risk
of 10-5
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Closure;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Filling; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Inorganics; MCLs; Metals; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCE; RCRA;
Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; TCE; VOCs.
HRANICA LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action
June 29, 1990
The 15-acre Hranica Landfill site is an inactive
landfill 21 miles north of Pittsburgh, in Butler
County, Pennsylvania. The site is in a rural
agricultural setting with 4,000 people residing
within a two-mile radius of the site. Between
1966 and 1974, both municipal and industrial
wastes were accepted onsite including paint
and solvent wastes, plating wastes, metal
sludge, and waste oils. The wastes were
incinerated and/or stored onsite in surface
impoundments until 1981. Liquid wastes were
then directly discharged into surface
impoundments causing ground, surface, and
soil cover contamination. The surface
impoundments were subsequently abandoned
and the wastes were then openly burned. The
residual ash from the incineration process was
stored onsite in unprotected piles. Numerous
drums of unprocessed wastes were also staged
onsite without further treatment. In 1983,
removal activities were performed which
included removing and disposing of more than
111
-------
19,000 drums and 4,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil; incinerating oil and paint
sludge and consolidating the incinerator ash
onsite; and capping the site. Although the
removal action reduced the extent of the
contamination, further site studies revealed
elevated levels of contamination in the ash pit
area, the landfill, and the former drum storage
areas. This first operable unit Record of
Decision addresses the soil contamination in the
ash pile area and other areas where the lead
concentration exceeds the background range.
The primary contaminant of concern affecting
the soil is lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes repairing the 29,000-square foot ash
pile cover, capping other areas where lead
contamination exceeds 300 mg/kg; monitoring
ground water and surface water; implementing
site access restrictions and institutional controls
including land and ground water use and deed
restrictions; and performing a ground water
verification study to determine whether any
ground water remediation is necessary. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,037,000, which includes an annual
O&M of $81,450 for year 0-1 and $30,550 for
years 2-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
By repairing the ash cover and capping the
lead-contaminated areas exceeding lead
300 mg/kg, the remedial action will reduce the
Hazard Index to below the target of 1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions including water and land use
restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Background Levels; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Closure Requirements; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals;
O&M; Onsite Containment; RCRA; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring.
KEYSTONE SANITATION LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action
September 30, 1990
The 40-acre Keystone Sanitation Landfill site, an
inactive, privately owned landfill, is in Union
Township, Adams County, Pennsylvania.
Surrounding land use is primarily agricultural
with scattered residences. From 1966 to 1990,
the unlined landfill accepted household and
municipal wastes as well as industrial and
construction debris, including
phosphorus-contaminated sand, potato sludge,
resin sludge, incineration ash, and dried latex
paint. The volume of non-homogeneous waste
at the site currently is 1.7 million cubic yards.
In 1982, State investigations revealed onsite
ground water contamination and a
contaminated onsite residential well attributable
to leachate from the landfill contents. In 1984,
EPA found low-level contamination in nearby
residential wells. As a result of the ground
water contamination, EPA ordered Keystone to
install an onsite spray irrigation system and a
leachate collection system to prevent migration
of contaminants offsite. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses Operable Unit 1
(OU1), the containment of onsite source area
and remediation of onsite contaminated ground
water. A subsequent ROD will address offsite
ground water contamination in monitoring and
residential wells (OU2). The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride; other organics
including acids and phenols; and metals
including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 4,150 cubic
yards of contaminated surface soil with
consolidation of the soil in the landfill; placing
a cap on the landfill and subsequent
revegetation; installing an active gas extraction
system to collect gases emitted from the
landfill; pumping and treatment of ground
water using equalization,
flocculation/precipitation, filtration, ion
exchange, air stripping, and filter press
technologies, followed by offsite disposal of any
sludge produced by these processes;
discharging the treated water onsite to a
surface stream; monitoring ground water,
surface water, and sediment; installing an
in-home water treatment system for the onsite
resident; and implementing site access
restrictions and institutional controls, including
deed, land use, and ground water restrictions.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $9,156,950, which includes an
annual O&M cost of $217,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No chemical-specific cleanup goals were stated
in the ROD. For carcinogenic compounds,
112
-------
cleanup goals were established to reduce the
excess lifetime cancer risk to 104 to 10"6. For
non-carcinogenic compounds, the goal is a
Hazard Index (HI) equal to 1 or less.
Individual ground water remediation standards
are based on the more stringent of SDWA
MCLs or non-zero MCLGs, or State background
levels. If these levels cannot be met, the ROD
will be amended.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed, land use,
and ground water use restrictions will be
implemented.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Air Stripping; Background
Levels; Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure; Lead; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCE; Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Monitoring; TCE; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria.
LORD SHOPE LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1990
The 25-acre Lord Shope Landfill site is an
inactive hazardous waste landfill in Girard
Township, Erie County, northwestern
Pennsylvania. The site consists of a 4-acre
landfill and adjacent areas of contaminated soil,
surface water and ground water. The
surrounding area is primarily agricultural and
residential, with two unnamed tributaries of Elk
Creek bordering the site to the north and west.
From the mid-1950s to 1979, industrial wastes,
including spent adhesives, degreasing solvents,
acids, caustics, and some drummed wastes
were disposed of onsite from nearby facilities.
During 1982 and 1983, responsible parties,
under an agreement with the State,
implemented a remedial alternative, which
included removing 81 exposed drums, capping
the landfill, and installing a low permeability
ground water cutoff wall to reduce leachate
production from the landfill and to divert
ground water flow around the site. Landfill
leachate has, however, resulted in VOC and
inorganic ground water contamination both
beneath and to the north of the landfill, with a
contaminant plume migrating towards the
north. Surface soil around the landfill has also
been found to contain elevated levels of VOCs.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the landfill material, surrounding soil, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, and TCE; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes in-situ vapor stripping using vacuum
wells to volatize and remove VOCs from the
landfill material and the surrounding soil;
collection and treatment of gas emissions
generated by the vapor stripping process using
carbon filtration; ground water pumping and
treatment including pretreatment for metal
removal, followed by air stripping, to halt
plume migration, with final discharge of treated
ground water into the nearby surface
tributaries; implementation of site access
restrictions and institutional controls including
ground water use restrictions. The estimated
present worth cost for the remedial action is
$5,760,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $420,000 for years 0-2, and $310,000 for
years 3-50.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific soil criteria for the landfill
material and the surrounding soil were not
provided, but will be determined during the
remedial design and will be based on soil
contaminant levels that will not significantly
impact the underlying ground water. Ground
water cleanup goals will meet SDWA MCLs or
proposed MCLs (PMCLs), and a 10"* excess
cancer risk or a Hazard Index = 1. Target
ground water cleanup levels include PCE
5 ug/1 (PMCL), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), benzene
5 ug/1 (MCL), arsenic 20 ug/1 (based on an
excess cancer risk of 10"*), chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL), and lead 15 ug/1 (risk-based
calculation). Ground water goals will be
revised to meet background levels in
accordance with State ARARs. Air emissions
from the air stripping of the ground water
treatment system and the gas released from the
in-situ vapor stripping process will be treated
to meet State standards.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use restrictions will be implemented to prevent
permitting and construction of ground water
wells in the contaminated plume area.
113
-------
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; PCE; Plume Management; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs.
M.W. MANUFACTURING, PA
Second Remedial Action
June 29, 1990
The 15-acre M.W. Manufacturing site is a
former copper recovery facility in Montour
County, Pennsylvania, two miles north of
Danville. The Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation (PennDOT) maintains a storage
area immediately north of the site, and
farmlands and wooded lots are adjacent to the
site on the west and south. Mauses Creek
flows in a southerly direction past the site.
Several private residences, motels, gas stations,
restaurants, and a Head Start school are located
just north of the Penn DOT storage area and
rely on private ground water wells for drinking
water. From 1966 to 1972, M.W. Manufacturing
was engaged in secondary copper recovery
from scrap wire, using both mechanical and
chemical processes. Granular carbon wastes
generated by the chemical process were
dumped onsite, and spent solvents and acids
were allegedly disposed of onsite. In 1972,
M.W. Manufacturing filed for bankruptcy and
the Philadelphia National Bank acquired the
property. Warehouse 81, Inc., acquired the site
in 1976 and unsuccessfully attempted to recover
copper from the large waste piles of fluff
material (fibrous insulation materials
contaminated with metals and solvents). The
initial remedial investigation revealed several
areas posing potential threats to public health:
the carbon waste pile, four wire-fluff waste
piles, a surface impoundment, a buried lagoon,
and contaminated soil, drums and storage
tanks. A 1989 remedial action addressed the
concerns for direct contact with, and migration
of contaminants from, the carbon waste pile by
excavating the carbon waste pile and
incinerating the waste offsite. This second
remedial action addresses the remaining
principal threats at the site by treating the
onsite waste and contaminated soil. A
subsequent remedial action will address
possible remediation of contaminated ground
water and offsite soil, sediment, and surface
water contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
debris, and lagoon water are VOCs including
PCE and TCE; other organics including PCBs;
and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation and onsite incineration of
approximately 32,000 cubic yards of fluff waste,
followed by stabilization of the
lead-contaminated ash and offsite disposal of
residual ash; excavation and onsite incineration
of approximately 13,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil, followed by onsite
stabilization, as necessary, before offsite
disposal; backfilling and capping the soil
(landfill closure) under the fluff waste piles;
covering the soil not under the fluff piles using
hybrid closure (topsoil cover and revegetation);
onsite treatment of approximately 86,000 gallons
of lagoon water using carbon adsorption and
metal removal, followed by onsite discharge to
surface water; and onsite incineration of
approximately 40 cubic yards of waste
contained in tanks and drums, followed by
stabilization of the ash and offsite disposal; and
ground water monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$35,950,000, which includes an estimated annual
O&M cost of $39,000 and an additional
estimated $20,000 every 5 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Action levels have been established for
soil/waste based on a 10"6 cancer risk level or
an HI of 1.0, where technically feasible. If soil
cannot be feasibly cleaned to the 10"6 risk level
(e.g., excessive volume of contaminated soil in
one particular area onsite), cleanup will reduce
the additional incremental risk to the ground
water to 10"1 levels or to MCLs, whichever are
more stringent. Chemical- specific cleanup
levels for soil, fluff waste, and drummed and
tanked wastes were provided for eight indicator
contaminants including PCE, TCE, PCB, and
lead.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Closure
Requirements; Debris; Dioxin; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water Monitoring;
Hybrid/Alternate Closure; Incineration/Thermal
114
-------
Destruction; Landfill Closure; Lead; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; PCE; RCRA;
Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Treatment; TCE; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
OSBORNE LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 15-acre Osborne Landfill site is an inactive
abandoned coal strip mine in Pine Township,
Mercer County, Pennsylvania. The site is in a
semi-rural area with a large natural pond,
woodlands, and wetlands bordering the site to
the west. The shallow Clarion aquifer is
present east of the strip mine highwall. The
portion of the aquifer that formerly overlaid the
site was excavated during stripping activities.
After the mine was abandoned, the strip mine
pit filled with ground water. From the late
1950s to 1978, contaminated spent foundry sand
and other industrial and municipal wastes were
disposed of into the pit. Other wastes
including trash and drums containing solvents,
wastewater, and coolants, were disposed of
onsite, gradually filling the strip mine and
displacing the water. The site holds an
estimated 233,000 cubic yards of fill material.
In 1983, Cooper Industries, an operator of the
site, removed approximately 600 drums of
waste and 45 cubic yards of soil from the site
and installed a fence to restrict site access.
EPA has divided the remedial action into five
operable units. Operable Unit 2 (OU2), which
addresses contaminated wetland sediment, and
OU5, which addresses the contaminated
Homewood aquifer will be implemented in a
subsequent Record of Decision (ROD). This
ROD addresses the remaining three operable
units. OU1 addresses solid waste fill material
including foundry sand and other onsite pond
sediment, OU3 addresses leachate associated
with the onsite water table, and OU4 addresses
the Clarion aquifer. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the sediment and ground
water are VOCs including benzene and TCE;
other organics including PCBs and PAHs; and
metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site is
comprised of three operable units. The
primary remedy for OU1 includes constructing
a slurry wall barrier around the perimeter of
the fill, constructing a clay cap over the fill
material, ground water pumping and treatment
using equalization, pH adjustment, chemical
precipitation, clarification, sand filtration, and
carbon adsorption, followed by injection into
the onsite mine pit; offsite disposal of ground
water treatment residues; ground water
monitoring; and implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions. A
contingency remedy for OU1 will be
implemented if performance standards cannot
be met during the pre-design stage of remedy
implementation and includes regrading the site,
excavating and placing solid waste in a RCRA
Subtitle-C onsite landfill; long-term ground
water monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls. If the primary remedy
for OU1 is implemented, no additional action,
other than the primary OU3 remedy of ground
water monitoring, is necessary for OU3. If the
contingency remedy for OU1 is implemented,
the contingency remedy for OU3 also must be
implemented. The contingency remedy for
OU3 includes dewatering the site during
excavation; isolating the fill area from the
onsite mine pools; treating the ground water
using equalization, clarification, and sand
filtration for solids removal, and carbon
adsorption for organics removal, followed by
onsite discharge; and ground water monitoring.
The selected remedy for OU4 includes pumping
and treatment of ground water in the Clarion
Formation using air stripping, onsite air
emissions treatment, onsite injection of treated
ground water, and ground water monitoring.
The estimated present worth cost for the
primary remedies is $18,681,000 with an annual
O&M cost of $904,000 for 30 years. If the
contingency remedies are implemented, the
estimated present worth cost is $17,811,000,
which includes an annual O&M cost of
$940,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected source remedy will not reduce the
current level of contamination in the fill area,
but will maintain an average PCB concentration
level of 23 mg/kg. EPA's PCB Spill Cleanup
Policy for a reduced access area is met by this
alternative. Ground water contaminants will be
remediated to the following background levels:
TCE 0.2 ug/1, benzene 0.2 ug/1, PCBs 1 ug/1,
chromium 50 ug/1, lead 15 ug/1, and arsenic
22 ug/1. If any ground water contaminants
exceed SDWA MCLs or MCLGs, the remedy
will continue until these goals are met.
115
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to reduce
exposure to the site. The State has required
that mining within a 1/2-mile of the site be
restricted.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic;
Background Levels; Benzene; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Water Act; Contingency
Remedy; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Offsite Disposal;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Lead; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Slurry Wall; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toxic Substances
Control Act; VOCs.
RAYMARK, PA
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 7-acre Raymark site is an active metal
manufacturing and electroplating plant in the
Borough of Hatboro, Montgomery County,
Pennsylvania. The site is in an industrial area
and is approximately 100 feet from the nearest
residence. The nearest surface water is
Pennypack Creek, which flows 4,000 feet
southwest of the site. As part of the rivet
manufacturing process at the plant, VOCs,
including 30 to 40 gallons of TCE, were used
daily at the site to clean and degrease metal
parts. In 1979, when EPA discovered TCE in
the Hatboro public water supply wells, the
Hatboro Borough Water Authority removed
these wells from operation, and supplemented
the water supply using an interconnection with
a neighboring water company. Further EPA
site investigations from 1980 to 1987 identified
TCE in soil and other wells onsite and adjacent
to the property and seem to indicate that
contaminants from the site may have been at
least a contributing source of contamination in
the downgradient public water supply wells.
Other chemical contaminants identified in
samples from the public water supply wells,
including TCA, did not seem to originate at
the site, thus indicating several distinct sources
for this contamination. In 1987, the site owners
agreed to install ground water treatment units
with air stripping towers, and, as necessary, air
emission control units, at two Hatboro public
supply wells to return these to routine
operation. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses contaminated drinking water and
ground water, which are referred to as
Operable Units 2 and 3 (OU2 & OU3),
respectively. The soil/source contamination
(OU1), will be addressed in a subsequent ROD.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including TCE and
PCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes continuing the operation and
maintenance of the Hatboro public supply and
the existing air stripping towers at the wells
and the installation of new vapor phase carbon
adsorption units; completing a ground water
remedial design study to determine the
number, location, and construction of new
extraction wells with corresponding installation
and implementation; onsite pumping and
treatment of ground water with air stripping
and vapor phase carbon adsorption units with
onsite discharge to Pennypack Creek; and
implementing institutional controls. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,700,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $125,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The ground water will be remediated until
contaminant levels reach SDWA MCLs,
non-zero MCLGs, or background levels,
whichever are more restrictive. The residual
excess cancer risk resulting from site-related
contamination will be reduced to a 10"* level
and non-carcinogenic levels will be reduced to
a Hazard Index = 1. Chemical-specific
standards for ground water include
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL) and PCE 5 ug/1 (proposed
MCL). Additional still-undefined, aquifer
contamination at the site may make it
technically impracticable to attain these levels,
and if so, an ARAR waiver will be enacted and
the ROD amended.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to restrict access
to the contaminated aquifer.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Background
Levels; Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
116
-------
MCLs; MCLGs; O&M; Onsite Discharge; PCE;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; VOCs.
SAND, GRAVEL AND STONE, MD
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 200-acre Sand, Gravel and Stone site is a
former sand and gravel quarry three miles west
of the town of Elkton, in Cecil County,
Maryland, along a tributary to Mill Creek.
Surface water in Mill Creek eventually flows to
the Elk River and the Chesapeake Bay.
Beginning in 1969, hazardous materials were
disposed of onsite. In 1974, a pool of chemical
waste burned in an onsite fire, the cause of
which has yet to be determined. Subsequently,
200,000 gallons of this liquid waste were
removed to an offsite landfill and the
remaining drums and sludge were buried
onsite in two excavated pits (eastern and
western). The site has been separated into
three operable units (OUs). A 1985 Record of
Decision (ROD) addressed OU1, the
remediation of shallow ground water
contamination near the eastern excavated pit,
source control (i.e., removal of buried drums),
and site access restrictions. This ROD focuses
on OU2, the threat posed by soil and ground
water contamination migrating from the eastern
portion of the site, including remediation of
ground water contamination in the lower
aquifers if needed, and evaluation of
contaminant sources near the western
excavation pit. Soil sampling analyses and
geophysical studies now show that there are no
unacceptable risks associated with soil in the
western area of the site. A future ROD will
address OUS, the contaminated soil, source
control, final site closure, and post-closure
operation and maintenance activities. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
TCE, toluene and xylenes; and metals.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes onsite and offsite ground water
monitoring. If this monitoring data
demonstrate that remediation is required,
ground water may be treated either onsite, or
offsite at point of use, and bottled water will
be supplied to affected residences and
businesses. The onsite treatment system
installed as a result of the first remedial action
would be expanded and modified, as necessary,
to treat the ground water in the lower aquifer.
Treatment measures may utilize granular
activated carbon, air stripping, ion exchange, or
any combination of these techniques. The
estimated present worth cost of this remedial
action ranges from $702,000 to $7,125,000,
depending on the extent and nature of
treatment required, and an annual O&M cost
ranging from $102,000 to $625,900 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Action levels that will trigger the
implementation of onsite and/or offsite ground
water treatment include concentrations of
chemicals of concern in excess of MCLs, a
cumulative carcinogenic risk in excess of 104, or
a non-carcinogenic Hazard Index greater than
1.0.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: ACL; Air Stripping; Benzene;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; MCLGs;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
TYSON DUMP #1, PA
Third Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 4-acre Tyson Dump #1 site is an
abandoned septic and chemical waste disposal
area in Upper Merion Township, Montgomery
County, Pennsylvania. The site consists of a
series of abandoned unlined lagoons in a
former sandstone quarry, and is bordered by
unnamed tributaries to the Schuylkill River on
the east and west, and a railroad switching
yard to the north. Beyond the railroad yard is
a floodplain/wetlands area and the Schuylkill
River, which flows southeast toward
Philadelphia. The river is the main source of
drinking water in the area. Barbadoes Island
lies in the center of the river in the site vicinity
and is used as an electrical substation. From
1960 until 1973, the privately owned site was
used for the disposal of liquid septic tank
wastes, sludge, and chemical wastes that were
hauled onsite in bulk tank trucks. In 1973, the
117
-------
State ordered the site owner to close the
facility. In 1983, EPA required that immediate
removal measures be taken, including
constructing a leachate collection and treatment
system with drainage controls, covering the
site, and implementing site access restrictions.
In 1984, the first Record of Decision (ROD) for
the site was issued for Operable Unit 1 (OU1),
which documented a remedy that included
excavation and offsite disposal of lagoon
materials. In 1988, a second ROD was signed,
which documented a remedy for treating the
ground water contamination under the offsite
areas (OU2), including the railroad yard and
wetlands areas, using steam stripping followed
by liquid-phase carbon adsorption as a
polishing step. This third ROD addresses OU3,
the further remediation of the contaminated
ground water that has migrated under the
Schuylkill River. Additional ground water
investigations will be conducted on the north
side of the river, and based on the results, a
fourth operable unit may be identified. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including toluene and
xylenes.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes installing additional recovery wells on
the south bank of the Schuylkill River and on
Barbadoes Island, followed by treating the
contaminated ground water at the existing
treatment facility on the south bank of the
river; expanding the capacity of the existing
treatment facility; investigating hydrogeologic
conditions on the north side of the river to
assess environmental impact and the need for
additional RODs; and implementing
institutional controls to restrict ground water
use. The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $10,100,000, which includes
an annual O&M cost of $834,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Discharge limits for treated ground water were
calculated by the State based on risk factors,
dilution within the river, and State and Federal
standards. These limits are toluene 1.52 mg/1
(based on a chronic WQC of 0.33 mg/1) and
xylenes 0.97 mg/1 (based on an MCL of
10.0 mg/1).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use on Barbados Island and on the north side
of the river within the contaminated ground
water plume will be restricted.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Plume
Management; State Standards/Regulations;
Toluene; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
U.S. TITANIUM, VA
First Remedial Action - Final
November 21, 1989
The 175-acre U.S. Titanium site, in Nelson
County, Virginia, is a former titanium dioxide
manufacturing plant which was operated from
1931 to 1971. The facility has had a succession
of owners and is currently owned by U.S.
Titanium Corporation. Approximately 50 acres
of the site will be addressed by this remedial
action, including seven waste storage areas
containing process wastes. These seven areas
include: Area 1, a burial pit containing 16,000
cubic yards of solid ferrous sulfate (copperas);
Area 2, a former copperas stockpile area; Area
3, an evaporation pond; Area 4, a 1-acre ore
waste pile; Area 5, sedimentation ponds
containing fine-grained sediment composed of
unreacted ore, filter cake, and gypsum; Area 6,
a settling pond used to recover phosphate ore;
and Area 7, a drainage area, which received
surface water runoff. Several of these areas lie
within the 100-year floodplain of the nearby
Piney River. After a large fish kill in 1979, the
State ordered U.S. Titanium to bury the
copperas waste from Area 2 by December 1980.
The copperas waste was collected and buried in
Area 1, the onsite burial pit. A supplemental
remedial investigation revealed the presence of
acidified soil underlying the waste storage
areas that contributes to ground water
contamination. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, ground water, and
surface water are metals including arsenic and
chromium; and other inorganics including
acids.
The selected remedial activities for the seven
areas within this site include: Area 1, in-situ
dissolution of copperas waste and treatment of
resulting leachate using physical and chemical
processes; Areas 2, 3, 4, and 5, diversion of
surface water flow using drainage controls
followed by revegetation; and Area 7,
excavation and neutralization of acidified soil,
followed by placement of the mixed material
118
-------
around a wetland that will be constructed
onsite. Area 6 requires no remedial action.
Ground water will be collected passively using
subsurface drains and trenches and treated
passively in an oxidation/settling pond, a
constructed wetland, and a limestone
neutralization bed. The oxidation/settling pond
will be capable of completely removing iron
and sulfur elements from the collected ground
water and will make up for any loss in the
performance of the wetland. Wetland
vegetation and anaerobic bacteria will remove
iron and sulfur species from the water. As a
result of this process, an increase in pH can be
expected. The limestone bed will act as a final
polishing step for pH adjustment before the
effluent is discharged to the Piney River. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $5,895,000, which includes present
worth O&M costs for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Action levels for in-situ dissolution and
leachate collection for Area 1 will ensure that
leaching of contaminants to ground and surface
waters will not exceed State water quality
standards which include arsenic 0.19 mg/1 and
chromium 0.011 mg/1. Effluent limits for
discharge from the ground water treatment
system into the surface water include iron
97,583 mg/1 and pH ranging from 6.0 to 9.0
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Local deed
restrictions may be implemented to prohibit
excavation at any of the contaminated areas
and at the wetland area that will be
constructed onsite. Site access restrictions will
also be implemented around the wetland.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Arsenic; Capping;
Chromium; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Treatment; Inorganics;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure;
Leachability Tests; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Discharge; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Soil; Soldification/Stabilization;
State/Standards/Regulations; Surface Water;
Treatment Technology.
WALSH LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action
June 29, 1990
The 7-acre Walsh Landfill site encompasses an
approximately 1.5-acre landfill and surrounding
area in a heavily wooded region of
Honeybrook Township, Chester County,
Pennsylvania. The landfill reportedly received
mixed municipal and industrial wastes for
disposal between 1963 and 1976, although State
investigations in 1979 revealed that disposal of
hazardous waste at the site had resumed after
that period. Investigations by the State
revealed the presence of fifteen to twenty
drums containing various hazardous substances,
including VOCs. Fumes from the drums
reportedly sickened local residents, and organic
and inorganic compounds were detected in
monitoring wells and private wells. In
addition to waste disposal, open burning of
material was conducted in the southeastern
portion of the landfill. Residential well
sampling from 1987 through 1989 resulted in
an interim remedial measure in 1989 to provide
bottled water to 44 residences. Currently, the
site is being operated as a solid waste transfer
station and salvage yard, and operations are
increasing the volume of landfill/junkyard
debris, and the overall size of the site. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses final
source control for the landfill and allows for
expedited action on the contaminated drinking
water supply. A second ROD will address the
contaminated ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, PCE, and TCE; other
organics including PAHs; and metals including
arsenic and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removal of bulky items and debris
from the landfill surface for resource recovery,
followed by construction of an approximately
5.2-acre landfill cap; provision of an alternate
water supply to approximately 50 residences by
extending the municipal water system; ground
water monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls including land use, ground
water use, and deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions. The estimated present worth cost
of this remedial action is $3,768,000, which
includes an estimated annual O&M cost of
$63,090 for 25 years except years 5, 10, 15, 20,
and 25, which will have an estimated O&M
cost of $108,950 due to the five-year reviews.
119
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Provision of an alternate water supply will
ensure availability of water meeting SDWA
MCLs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including land use, ground water use,
and deed restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Closure Requirements; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Organics; PAHs; PCE; Sediment; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
WESTLINE, PA
First Remedial Action (Amendment)
March 30, 1990
The Westline site is a former chemical plant in
the rural community of Westline, LaFayette
Township, McKean County, Pennsylvania. The
site is situated along Kinzua Creek and is
completely surrounded by the Allegheny
National Forest. From 1901 to 1952, the Day
Chemical Company plant was operated to
convert lumber to charcoal, methanol, and
acetic acid. The Day Chemical Company
deposited tar material containing phenolic
compounds and PAHs into onsite lagoons and
into small canals to allow the tar material to
migrate downhill towards the banks of Kinzua
Creek. In 1983, EPA conducted an immediate
removal action to remove 2,000 tons of tar and
contaminated soil from the largest lagoon of tar
deposits. Although a 1986 Record of Decision
(ROD) addressed the remediation of an
additional 2,340 tons of tar and soil found in
an onsite tar pit and in some of the interpersed
tar deposits along Kinzua Creek, there was still
an estimated 4,000 tons of tar material left at
the site in the areas planned for excavation.
Most of the remaining tar, however, is three
feet below the surface and is not a dermal
contact threat. Based on an updated risk
assessment using more recent risk criteria for
PAHs, EPA has determined that the residual
soil and tar material presents no potential
carcinogenic risk greater than the range of
acceptable risks found at other Superfund sites
and will thus discontinue excavating soil and
tar material. This ROD amends a July 1986
ROD, which called for the excavation and
offsite incineration and disposal of waste tar
from an onsite tar pit and the interspersed tar
deposits along Kinzua Creek. There are no
longer any primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil at the site.
The selected remedial action for this ROD
amendment is no further action. Because some
tar material will remain onsite, EPA will
monitor the site to prevent unacceptable
exposure from the waste tar, and a five-year
review will be scheduled. No costs were
specified for this no action remedy.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy; ROD
Amendment.
120
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 4
(Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee)
62nd STREET DUMP, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
June 27, 1990
The 5-acre 62nd Street Dump site is an inactive
industrial waste disposal area in Tampa,
Hillsborough County, Florida. Several marsh
areas and a series of fish breeding ponds lie
adjacent to the site. Surrounding land use is
mixed light industrial and residential. The site
overlies a series of sedimentary rock aquifers,
which are currently used as drinking water
sources. In the mid-1970s, the site was used as
a sand borrow pit. After this operation halted,
industrial wastes, including auto parts,
batteries, and kiln dust were dumped onsite.
Industrial dumping ceased in 1976, but
unauthorized onsite dumping of construction
materials and household garbage continued. In
1976, fish kills occurred in the adjacent ponds,
which lead to site investigations in 1979 and
1980 by private groups. Based on these
investigations, the contamination was
determined to be the result of waste material
leaching from the landfill. Several additional
investigations were conducted from 1983 to
1989 to identify and further characterize
contaminant sources and contaminated media.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
source remediation and onsite and offsite
ground water contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
debris, and ground water are organics
including PCBs; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes dewatering and excavating
approximately 48,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and non-cement debris,
followed by onsite treatment using
solidification/stabilization, and placing the
treated material onsite within the original
dump area; capping the site with an
impermeable membrane and vegetative soil
cover; pumping and onsite treatment of
contaminated ground water using chromium
reduction, flocculation, sedimentation, and
filtration, followed by offsite discharge to a
publicly owned treatment works (POTW) or
onsite discharge to surface water; disposing of
residual sludge onsite; monitoring ground
water; and implementing institutional controls
including land use restrictions. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$16,460,000, which includes an estimated
present worth O&M cost of $690,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Federal MCLs were chosen as cleanup
standards for ground water. Chemical-specific
goals include chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL) and
lead 15 ug/1 (proposed MCL). Soil cleanup
criteria were chosen as the more stringent of
health-based criteria or values calculated from
a leachate model. Chemical-specific goals for
soil include PCBs 0.33 mg/kg, arsenic
3.5 mg/kg, chromium 8.8 mg/kg, and lead
17.4 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land use
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Water Act;
Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCBs; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
BYPASS 601 GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION, NC
First Remedial Action
August 31, 1990
The Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination
site, is in Concord, Cabarrus County, North
Carolina. One of the potential sources of onsite
contamination is the 13-acre Martin Scrap
Recycling Facility (MSR) facility, an inactive
battery salvage and recycling operation.
121
-------
Ground water at the site has also been found
to be contaminated with heavy metals by
several unknown sources. The MRS Facility
consists of two tracts of land; the larger tract
includes a main facility that was used for lead
reclamation activities; and the second lot
encompasses the floodplain area. The
immediate area surrounding the MSR Facility
is commercial, light industrial and residential
with 1,400 persons residing within a 3-mile
radius of the site. The Main Facility is
comprised of several lead-contaminated
buildings including a scale house, several
garages and sheds, as a result of onsite battery
cracking operations. Contaminated debris
including old tanks, drums, wires, casings, and
trash is spread throughout the Main Facility
area. The southeastern corner of the Main
Facility has been backfilled with cracked battery
casings to a depth of 20 feet. Approximately
57,000 cubic yards of lead-contaminated soil
remains onsite from previous battery salvage
activities. A 1984 EPA site investigation found
high levels of metals in nearby wells. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses Operable
Unit 1 (OU1), which will contain the source
contamination from the MSR facility to
minimize the continued degradation of ground
water and surface water. Subsequent RODs
will address the final action and remediation of
other onsite contaminant sources (OU2) and
ground water contamination (OU3). The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and debris are metals including chromium
and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site is an
interim action, which includes demolishing and
disposing of debris from four onsite buildings;
excavating and consolidating the contaminated
surface soil; regrading the site, covering with
area with 6 inches of clean fill, covering the
soil with a HPDE liner, with 18 inches of
drainage soil and 6 additional inches of clean
topsoil; revegetating the area; backfilling
excavated areas, realigning an adjacent stream
to minimize the erosion of the cap;
maintaining the soil cover; and enacting public
awareness programs; and implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions
and site access restrictions including fencing.
The present worth cost for this remedial action
is $738,821, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $9,700.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil contaminated with lead will be remediated
to 500 mg/kg (EPA Interim Guidance).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS:
Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Debris;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Institutional Controls; Interim Remedy; Lead;
Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Disposal; Soil; State Standards/Regulations.
CABOT/KOPPERS, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 99-acre Cabot/Koppers site is a pine tar
and charcoal generation facility in Gainesville,
Alachua County, Florida. The site is underlain
by shallow and intermediate aquifers. Land in
the site vicinity is used for commercial and
residential purposes. The site is comprised of
2 distinct areas, the inactive Cabot Carbon
property to the southeast, and the industrial
zoned and currently operating Koppers area to
the west. North Main Street borders the entire
site to the west as does a drainage ditch, which
drains into nearby Springstead and Hogtown
creeks. Pine tar and charcoal generation
operations began at the Cabot Carbon facility
in the early 1900s and generated a large
number of blended solvents as by-products.
Resultant wastewaters were treated onsite in a
lagoon. The Koppers portion of the site has
been operated since 1916 as a wood preserving
operation, primarily for utility poles and
timbers. The main processing facilities at the
Koppers area include a tank farm, a former
cooling water pond, cylinder drip tracks, a
wastewater management system comprised of
a north and south lagoon, a wood shavings
pile, and drying kilns. Between 1980 and 1989,
various site investigations by the State, EPA
and private parties identified soil contamination
in the three lagoons, the inactive cooling pond,
the drip tracks, and a wood shavings pile.
Ground water contamination also was identified
in both the onsite shallow and intermediate
aquifers. In addition, in 1986 the State
identified organics and heavy metal
contamination in offsite soil west of the site.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
contaminated onsite soil and ground water.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
122
-------
the soil and ground water are VOCs including
benzene; other organics including oils, phenols,
and PAHs; and metals including arsenic and
chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 6,400 cubic yards of onsite
contaminated soil from the north and south
Koppers lagoon areas, treating the soil using
soil washing and bioremediation if necessary,
followed by solidifying/stabilizing the residual
material and disposing of these residuals onsite;
treating soil from the cooling pond and drip
track areas by in-situ bioremediation; lining the
North Main Street ditch to prevent further
discharge of leachate (if the ditch is to remain
intact); pumping and treatment of ground
water followed by offsite discharge to a
publicly owned treatment works (POTW);
operating and maintaining the North Main
Street lift station as needed until the ground
water remediation system renders it
superfluous; monitoring ground water and
surface water; and implementing institutional
controls including land use restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $4,192,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $388,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific soil cleanup goals were
developed based on ground water protection
and include carcinogenic PAHs 0.59 mg/kg,
phenols 4.28 mg/kg, arsenic 27 mg/kg, and
chromium 92.7 mg/kg. Chemical-specific
ground water cleanup goals include
carcinogenic PAHs 0.003 ug/1 (health-based),
phenols 2,630 ug/1, arsenic 50 ug/1, chromium
50 ug/1 (MCL), and benzene 1 ug/1 (State).
Total noncarcinogenic risk will result in a HI <
1.0.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including land use restrictions will be
implemented to prevent exposure to onsite
contamination.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application: Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Oils; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Phenols; Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW); Safe
Drinking Water Act; Soil Washing/Flushing;
Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; Surface Water
Monitoring; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
CITY INDUSTRIES, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
March 29, 1990
The City Industries site is a former hazardous
waste recycling and transfer facility in
Goldenrod Township, Orange County, Florida,
near the cities of Winter Park and Orlando.
The city of Winter Park's water supply well
field is located approximately 1,900 feet west of
the site. These wells draw from the deep
Floridan aquifer, which is separated from a
surficial aquifer by a 140-foot-thick confining
layer. In 1971, a former fuel oil business at the
site was developed into a waste-handling
facility. Activities at the site included
receiving, handling, storing, reclaiming, and
disposing of various waste chemicals.
Improper disposal practices and intentional
dumping led to onsite soil and surficial ground
water contamination. In 1983, after the State
ordered the business closed, the site was
abandoned. The State subsequently removed
the onsite waste drums, some contaminated
soil, and waste sludge. In 1984, EPA removed
and thermally treated 1,670 tons of
contaminated soil and disposed of the residuals
onsite. Additionally, EPA removed 180 cubic
yards of highly contaminated soil and
transported the soil to an offsite hazardous
waste landfill. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses contaminated ground water, which is
migrating through the surficial aquifer, a
potential drinking water source, and prevention
of contaminant migration to the deeper
Floridan aquifer. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including benzene, PCE, TCE, and toluene.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and treatment of ground
water using air stripping, followed by offsite
discharge to a publicly owned treatment works
(POTW), if treatability studies show the
discharged water meets pretreatment standards;
and ground water monitoring. If a local
POTW will not accept the treated effluent, a
contingency remedy will be instituted, which
includes ground water pumping and treatment
using air stripping followed by precipitation,
filtration, carbon adsorption, and possibly
biological oxidation; conducting treatability
123
-------
studies to ensure compliance with surface water
discharge criteria; and discharging the treated
effluent off site to a nearby drainage canal.
Both the selected and contingency remedies
include implementation of institutional controls,
including land use and deed restrictions, and
securing construction rights-of-way and
easements at the site. The estimated present
worth cost for the selected remedial action is
$4,575,632, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $292,500 for 15 years. The estimated present
worth cost for the contingency remedy is
$4,262,101, which includes present worth O&M
costs of $2,849,191 for 15 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The surficial aquifer is a potential source of
drinking water, therefore, contaminant levels
must be reduced to drinking water standards,
including benzene 1.0 ug/1 (State drinking
water standard), PCE 3.0 ug/1 (State drinking
water standard), TCE 3.0 ug/1 (State drinking
water standard), and toluene 2,000 ug/1
(Proposed MCLG).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions, as well as construction
easements and other rights-of-way, will be
implemented.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Air Act; Clean Water Act; Contingency
Remedy; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLGs; MCLs; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE;
Plume Management; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Treatability Studies; VOCs.
COLEMAN-EVANS WOOD
PRESERVING, FL
First Remedial Action - Final (Amendment)
September 26, 1990
The 11-acre Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving
site is a former wood treatment facility, which
was operated from 1954 to the late 1980s, in
the community of Whitehouse, Duval County,
Florida. The surrounding land use is primarily
residential and light commercial/industrial, and
there are approximately 1,000 local residents
who rely exclusively on ground water for their
drinking water supply. The site is divided into
2 areas, including a wood treatment facility on
the western portion of the site, and a landfill
area used for disposal of wood chips and other
facility wastes on the eastern portion of the
site. In addition to the treatment and storage
areas there is an onsite drainage ditch that
carries site runoff into nearby McGirts Creek.
Prior to 1970, wastewater from the facility was
precipated and discharged to the onsite
drainage ditch. The precipitated sludge was
deposited into two unlined pits until 1970,
when the sludge was stored in tanks. The
wastewater treatment process was also
enhanced in 1970 with lime precipitation and
chlorination. In 1980, onsite ground water
contamination was detected and activated
charcoal filters were added to the treatment
process to remove organics. The primary
contaminant in onsite soil and ground water
has been identified as pentachlorophenol (PCP).
The highest areas of PCP concentration were in
the vicinity of onsite chemical tanks and the
unlined pit areas. In 1985, EPA conducted an
emergency response, which included excavating
and disposing of pit material offsite and filling
excavated areas with clean fill. PCP-laden fuel
is thought to be floating on the water table
surface; however, only limited low, level
ground water contamination has been detected
onsite. This Record of Decision (ROD) amends
a 1986 ROD, which documented the selection of
incineration for an estimated 9,000 cubic yards
of contaminated soil. Since that time,
additional studies during the remedial design
phase indicated that there are approximately
27,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil. Based
on the excessive volume of soil and the high
cost of incineration, treatability studies were
conducted and an alternative source control
treatment was selected. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, and ground water are organics
including PCP and metals.
The selected amended remedial action for this
site includes excavating approximately 27,000
cubic yards of soil and sediment contaminated
with PCP levels greater than 25 mg/kg, and
pre-treating these materials using soil washing;
separating clean soil fractions from
contaminated soil fines and woody wastes,
followed by solidification/stabilization of any
soil fines or sludge, which exceed cleanup
criteria; placing a cover over the solidified
mass; replacing the solidified soil and sludge
onsite; treating residual soil wash water using
124
-------
bioremediation, followed by a granular
activated polishing unit with subsequent onsite
discharge to the drainage ditch; pumping and
recovering ground water to facilitate soil
excavation, followed by onsite treatment using
the GAC adsorption unit, if PCP levels exceed
1.0 ug/1, and using chemical precipitation for
metals removal prior to discharging ground
water to the onsite drainage ditch; covering the
area with vegetation; and implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions,
and site access restrictions including fencing.
The estimated total cost for this remedial action
is $8,567,304. There are no O&M costs
associated with this remedy.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil contaminated with PCPs greater than
25.0 mg/kg will be excavated and treated to
the established cleanup level below 25 mg/kg.
After bioremediation, solidified/stabilized
contaminant fines will meet Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure Criteria of
3.6 mg/kg. Ground water recovered during
soil dewatering will be treated to below PCP
1.0 ug/1 (State).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Biodegradation/Land
Application; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Leachability Tests; MCLs; Metals; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; RCRA; ROD Amendment;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil; Soil
Washing/Rushing; Solidification/Stabilization;
State Standards/ Regulations; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology.
DUBOSE OIL PRODUCTS, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
March 29, 1990
The 20-acre Dubose Oil Products site is an
inactive waste storage, treatment, recycling, and
disposal facility in Cantonment, Escambia
County, Florida. Surrounding land use is
primarily rural agricultural. The site overlies a
deep aquifer, which serves as a drinking water
source for area residents. Site operations began
in 1979, and included thermal treatment of
waste oil, petroleum refining wastes, oil based
solvents, and wood treatment wastes; steam
heating of spent iron/steel pickle liquors; and
rock salt filtration of waste diesel fuel. Liquid
waste was transferred from tanker trucks and
drums to onsite treatment tanks for these
processes. Empty drums were either sold or
crushed and buried onsite. Operations ceased
in 1981, and the site owner commenced closure
of the site without a proper closure plan.
Unauthorized closure activities included
excavation of buried drums (causing some
drums to be punctured), operation of an
aeration system to remediate onsite drainage
ponds, and movement of contaminated material
with heavy equipment. A State emergency
response action in 1985 included excavation
and onsite vaulting of 38,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and the offsite disposal of
onsite drums. Site investigations in 1988
identified the soil containment vault as the
principal contaminant source and revealed
contamination above health-based levels of the
shallow aquifer beneath the site, in onsite
surface water, and sediment. Investigations
showed that the deep aquifer contained
extremely low to undetectable levels of
contaminants, which were below drinking water
standards. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses final remediation of source areas and
onsite shallow ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, ground water, and surface water are
VOCs including benzene, TCE, toluene, and
xylenes; and other organics including PAHs
and phenols.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating the top 20 feet of vault soil
containing low-level contamination and
disposing of soil in an onsite ravine area;
excavating the remaining vault soil and treating
by aerobic biodegradation, which includes
windrowing of soil on a concrete slab, addition
of microbial seed and nutrients, and aeration;
disposing of treated soil onsite in the ravine
area; placing a two-foot soil cover over the
vault area and the ravine area; treating soil
leachate from the windrowing process using
filtration and either carbon adsorption or UV
oxidation followed by onsite discharge to
surface water; draining and filling of onsite
ponds; installing surface water runoff controls;
conducting ground water and soil monitoring;
restoring ground water by natural attenuation;
and implementing institutional controls
including deed and ground water use
restrictions. The estimated present worth cost
125
-------
for this remedial action is $3,008,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $115,000 for
years 0 to 5 and $10,000 for years 6 to 10.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup standards for leachate discharge are
based on the more stringent of Federal or State
ARARs and include benzene 1 ug/1 (State),
TCE 3 ug/1 (State), xylenes 50 ug/1 (State), and
PNAs 10 ug/1 (EPA detection limit). Soil
cleanup goals are based on either leaching
potential (LP) or health-based criteria (HBC)
and include benzene 10 mg/kg (HBC), TCE
0.050 mg/kg (LP), xylenes 1.5 mg/kg (LP), and
PAHs 50 mg/kg (LP).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and
ground water use restrictions will be
implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Filling; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls;
Leachate Collection/Treatment; MCLGs; MCLs;
O&M; Oils; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Sediment; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Collection/Diversion; TCE; Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Water Quality
Criteria; Xylenes.
HARRIS/PALM BAY FACILITY, FL
First Remedial Action
June 28, 1990
The 345-acre Harris/Palm Bay Facility site is an
electronics manufacturing company in Palm
Bay, Brevard County, Florida. Surrounding
land use is commercial, residential, and
industrial. The site overlies an unconsolidated
aquifer, which is used by a public wellfield
located south of and downgradient of the site.
From the 1950s to 1967, the site was operated
by an electronics firm when Harris Corporation
purchased the facility. Current facility
operations are subdivided into the Government
Systems operations area and the Semiconductor
Complex area. In 1981, EPA identified VOCs
in ground water wells located south of the
Government Systems facility. Ground water
contamination was attributed to several onsite
incidents at the Government Systems plant
including two fires, which resulted in the
dumping of chemical vats, a broken
acid/solvent line, and spillage at drum storage
areas. Seepage from two former treatment
lagoons may also be a source of a shallow
contaminant plume. In 1985, Harris
constructed a treatment facility to implement an
onsite ground water treatment and monitoring
program which is still in operation. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses ground
water contamination at the Government
Systems facility. A subsequent ROD will
address the contaminated ground water at the
Semiconductor Complex and all of the
contaminated onsite soil. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including TCE; metals
including chromium and lead; and other
inorganics including fluoride.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes continued ground water pumping and
treatment using air stripping to remove VOCs;
using the treated ground water as industrial
process water then reinjecting the treated
ground water onsite into a deep aquifer; and
evaluating and modifying the existing ground
water monitoring program to fully characterize
onsite contamination. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $1,430,000,
which includes a total O&M cost of $950,000
for five years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The goal of this remedial action is to restore
the aquifer to its beneficial use. Cleanup
standards were chosen as the more stringent of
State or Federal SDWA standards.
Chemical-specific ground water goals include
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL),
and lead 15 ug/1 (proposed MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Inorganics; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
126
-------
HIPPS ROAD LANDFILL, FL
First Remedial Action (Amendment) - Final
September 21, 1990
The 7-acre Hipps Road Landfill site is an
inactive landfill in Jacksonville, Duvall County,
Florida. Surrounding land use is rural
residential. The site overlies a sedimentary
surficial aquifer system, used as a source of
drinking water, which has been affected by the
site. Prior to the start of landfilling operations
in 1968, the site was a cypress swamp. Types
of hazardous waste disposed of onsite included
cans of TCE and artillery rounds from U.S.
Navy facilities. After onsite operations ceased,
the property was divided into lots, and five
homes were constructed on the landfill.
Subsequently, biota in an adjacent pond died,
and area residents began to complain of
deteriorating well water quality. In 1983, State
investigations confirmed the presence of ground
water contamination, and bottled water was
supplied to the affected residents.
Consequently in 1985, area homes were
connected to the municipal water supply. In
1989, remedial actions stemming from a 1986
Record of Decision (ROD) commenced, and
included properly closing the landfill and
implementing institutional controls. In
addition, the 1986 ROD documented ground
water pumping and treatment at a publicly
owned treatment works (POTW) as part of the
overall site remedy. In 1990, the landfill was
capped to control the source of the
contamination. Ground water investigations
after 1986 revealed that the ground water
contaminantion plume was not as extensive,
and the overall site quality was better than
previously estimated. This ROD amends the
1986 ROD for the ground water component.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including benzene;
and metals including chromium and lead.
The 1986 selected ground water remedial action
included ground water pumping, followed by
offsite discharge to a POTW for treatment.
This amendment provides for onsite ground
water treatment using air stripping to remove
VOCs, followed by onsite discharge of the
treated water to a storm water retention basin,
and monitoring of onsite and offsite ground
water. This amendment will substantially
decrease the overall cost of the remedy from
that of the POTW treatment alternative. The
estimated present worth cost for this amended
remedial action is $1,242,000, which includes an
O&M cost of $370,600 for five years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup standards were chosen
as the more stringent of State standards or
Federal MCLs. Chemical-specific goals for
ground water include benzene 1 ug/1 (State),
chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL), and lead 15 ug/1
(Federal Recommended Cleanup Goal). Lead
and chromium contamination were determined
to be non-site related, but cleanup goals will be
met in water discharged to the retention basin.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls, which were implemented as part of
the 1986 ROD, include ground water and land
use restrictions.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Lead; MCLGs; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; ROD Amendment;
Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
HOWE VALLEY LANDFILL, KY
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 11-acre Howe Valley Landfill site is an
inactive landfill in Howe Valley, Hardin
County, Kentucky. A Class IIA aquifer
underlies the site, but is not currently used as
a drinking water source. Ground water flow is
southeasterly toward Boutwell Spring and
Linders Creek. From 1967 to 1976, 2.5 acres of
the site were used for disposal of refuse and
manufacturing by-products. In 1974, a State
inspection revealed that acidic liquid wastes
were being dumped directly into the landfill, in
direct violation of the solid-waste disposal
permit issued. Although the permit expired in
1974, the landfill continued dumping operations
until 1976. In 1988, EPA required the removal
of 9,150 full or partially filled drums containing
metal plating sludge, caulk, flammable silicone
polymers, and paint-like pigments; 1,621 empty
drums; 6,000 smaller containers; and 3,000 cubic
yards of loose waste from the site. State
investigations in 1987 found that the potential
migration of this waste posed a drinking water
127
-------
hazard. Contaminant levels for the underlying
ground water system cannot accurately be
monitored because of the karst topography at
the site. This remedial action focuses on
reducing the source contamination. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil are VOCs including PCE; and metals
including chromium.
The selected remedial action for the site
includes excavating approximately 100 cubic
yards of soil from the outlying areas of the site
containing elevated inorganic levels, followed
by disposal offsite; excavating approximately
7,400 cubic yards of soil with elevated
concentrations of organics, followed by aeration;
performing a treatability study to ensure that
an onsite aeration process will reduce organic
concentrations in soil to acceptable levels; onsite
disposal of the treated soil; onsite air
monitoring; installing water diversion ditches to
prevent water from running onto the aerating
soil; covering the area with soil and installing
a vegetative cover over the entire site;
monitoring ground water at Boutwell Spring
and at additional springs or wells; and
implementing institutional controls, such as
deed restrictions, to limit the property and
ground water usage. If the treatability study
indicates that soil aeration will not effectively
reduce contamination to protective levels, a
proposed contingency remedy would include
excavating, stockpiling, and transporting
approximately 7,500 cubic yards of
contaminated soil to an offsite RCRA-approved
landfill for disposal. The estimated present
worth cost of the primary remedial action is
$394,524, which includes a total O&M cost of
$42,625 for five years. The estimated present
worth cost of the contingency remedy is
$3,852,000, which includes a total O&M cost of
$42,625 for five years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Health-based soil action levels have been
calculated for the site-specific conditions, and
include PCE 7.50 rng/kg and chromium (VI)
400 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to limit
property and ground water usage.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Air Monitoring; Air
Stripping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Contingency Remedy; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; Treatability Studies;
VOCs.
JADCO-HUGHES, NC
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 6-acre Jadco-Hughes site is a former
solvent reclamation and waste storage facility
in North Belmont, Gaston County, North
Carolina. The surrounding area, along with
portions of the site, contains woodlands
interspersed with industrial and residential
developments. Two unnamed tributaries that
flow through the site ultimately empty into the
Catawba River, which is the predominant
public drinking water supply source for the
area. Ground water is not used as drinking
water onsite, but offsite residents who do not
yet have municipal water connections utilize
this ground water for their drinking water
source. From 1969 to 1975, the plant was
operated to reclaim used waste paint and
ink-type solvents. In addition, the plant area
was used to store drummed wastes, including
waste chemicals and sludge from area
industries. In 1975, the State ordered the
cleanup of two in-ground solvent pits and the
consolidation and covering of contaminated
surface soil in an onsite landfill in the
southwest portion of the site. In 1983, all
remaining storage tanks, a mobile tanker, and
drums were removed from the site. In
addition, responsible parties are currently
leading the remediation of PCB-contaminated
soil in a southeastern area of the site, also
known as the "swale" area. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses the remediation of
remaining contaminated soil and the
contaminated ground water and surface water.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, ground water, and surface water are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; other organics including PCBs and
phenols; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes soil venting followed by vacuum
extraction and carbon adsorption to remove
VOCs and other organics; flushing the treated
128
-------
soil, then collecting and treating the residual
water in a ground water treatment system;
collecting ground water with a subsurface drain
system; pumping ground water from highly
contaminated areas followed by pretreatment
using aeration and carbon adsorption to reduce
VOC concentrations and subsequent offsite
discharge to a publicly owned treatment works
(POTW); conducting a treatability study to
ensure compliance with POTW pretreatment
standards; replacing an onsite surface water
culvert; monitoring ground water and surface
water; sampling soil and sediment; and
implementing institutional controls, including
land and ground water use restrictions. A
contingency remedy has also been prepared for
this site in the event that a POTW will not
accept the discharge from the site within a
reasonable time frame. The contingency
remedy includes ground water pumping and
treatment using ultraviolet oxidation followed
by discharge to an onsite tributary. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $4,830,900, which includes an
estimated present worth O&M cost of
$2,665,600 for 30 years. No costs were
provided for the contingency remedy.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The goal of this remedial action is to restore
ground water to its beneficial use as a potential
drinking water source. Both soil and ground
water cleanup goals were developed to
remediate and protect the ground water.
Chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil include
PCBs 10.0 mg/kg (TSCA), arsenic 48.0 mg/kg
(background), chromium 140.0 mg/kg
(background), and lead 1.3 mg/kg. Treatment
goals for ground water include benzene 1 ug/1
(State), PCE 0.7 ug/1 (State), phenols 4,200 ug/1
(RfD), TCE 2.8 ug/1 (State), toluene 1,000 ug/1
(State), xylenes 400 ug/1 (State), arsenic 50 ug/1
(State), chromium 50 ug/1 (State), and lead
15 ug/1 (Recommended Cleanup Goal for
Superfund sites).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including land use and ground water
use restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Arsenic; Background
Levels; Benzene; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Contingent Remedy; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
MCLGs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; PCE; Phenols;
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW);
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; Soil
Washing/Flushing; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; Toxic
Substances Control Act; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction; Soil
Venting; VOCs; Xylenes.
KASSOUF-KIMERLING BATTERY
DISPOSAL, FL
Second Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1990
The Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal site,
formerly known as the Timber Lake Battery
Disposal site and the 58th Street Landfill, is in
Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida within a
100-year floodplain area. The site consists of a
42,000 square foot landfill area with an
estimated landfill volume of 11,350 cubic yards.
The site is bordered by small lakes and
marshes to the north, east, and west. Surface
water flows from the west marsh to the east
marsh by way of a canal which cuts through
the site, connects the marsh areas, and
eventually discharges into the Palm River. In
1978, empty battery casings were deposited in
previously excavated onsite areas, and
contributed to the release of metals into the
landfill. Storm water running eastward off of
the landfill drained into the wetlands, and the
dense wetland vegetation has contributed to the
retention of heavy metal contamination. The
first Operable Unit (OU1) Record of Decision
(ROD) addressed remediation of landfill wastes
and contaminated underlying soil. This ROD
addresses contamination of wetlands adjacent to
the landfill. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the sediment and surface
water are metals including arsenic, chromium,
and lead.
The selected remedial action for the site
includes dredging 15,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sediment in the canal that lies
within 150 feet of the landfill, and marsh area
sediment within 20 feet of the landfill to a
depth of 2 feet; solidifying and stabilizing the
sediment and disposing of the treated sediment
onsite along with the treated landfill wastes
from OU1; covering the area with soil;
implementing engineering controls on the canal
to flood the wetlands year round; wetlands
129
-------
mitigation; and ground water monitoring. A
waiver will be invoked for surface water
because of the negative impact that further
remediation would have on sediment in the
wetlands area and the potential for mobilization
of lead beyond the site areas. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$511,700, which includes a total O&M cost of
$99,500.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Marsh sediment within 20 feet of the landfill
and sediment in the canal within 150 feet of
the landfill will be remediated to achieve
Federal Ambient Water Quality Criteria
(FAWQC) and include lead 40 mg/kg. A
waiver of the FAWQC will be imposed on
marsh sediment greater than 20 feet away from
the landfill and sediment in the canal greater
than 150 feet away from the landfill.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: ARAR Waiver; Arsenic;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Dredging;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water
Monitoring; Landfill Closure; Lead; MCLs;
MCLGs; Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sediment;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Collection/Diversion; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands.
LEWISBURG DUMP, TN
First Remedial Action - Final
September 19, 1990
The 20-acre Lewisburg Dump site includes a
4-acre abandoned landfill developed in an
abandoned 6-acre limestone quarry in
Lewisburg, Marshall County, Tennessee. Land
in the vicinity of the site is primarily used as
farm and pasture land. There are four public
water wells located within one-half mile of the
site. This municipally-owned and operated site
began landfilling operations between 1963 and
1969, and a variety of residential and industrial
wastes, including solvents and metallic wastes
were landfilled onsite. Some municipal waste
was burned onsite, and the resulting ash was
placed in the dump. Soil samples taken from
various test pits during State investigations
showed elevated levels of metals and organics
onsite. In addition, a 2-acre quarry pond was
suspected to be contaminated when oil and
other debris were seen floating on its surface
and gas bubbles were observed in the absence
of any aquatic life. In 1973, the State found
that the old quarry was in violation of recent,
more stringent State environmental laws, and
concluded that landfilling operations should be
discontinued. In 1975, the State approved
plans for interim maintenance and final closure
of the dump. In 1977, the waste was covered
with soil as part of the preliminary closure
activities. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses the contaminated soil and debris
present at the site in the landfill and in the
quarry pond, and provides for protection of the
ground water, pond water, and sediment from
further contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
debris are organics including
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP); and metals
including aluminum, barium, copper, zinc, and
manganese.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing landfill surface and quarry
debris and disposing of the wastes in one of
the test pits at the site, an approved sanitary
landfill, or a hazardous waste landfill; replacing
the plastic test-pit caps with landfill cap
material; regrading the landfill cap to stabilize
site conditions and to meet State and Federal
regulations; revegetating the landfill; conducting
long-term ground water monitoring and
analysis; and implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions to restrict
site usage, and site access restrictions such as
fencing. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action ranges between $791,512
and $1,189,741 (depending on which of the
three disposal options is implemented), which
includes a total O&M cost of $270,042 for years
0 to 5.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil or
debris were provided. Source treatment and
removal should indirectly reduce the level of
ground water contamination. Chemical-specific
ground water cleanup goals are based primarily
on the proposed MCL for DEHP 4.0 ug/1. The
surface water cleanup goal for copper is
12.0 ug/1, which will be less than or equal to
a hazard quotient of 1.0.
130
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to limit site
usage.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Clean Water Act;
Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water Monitoring;
Inorganics; Institutional Controls; MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Organics; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations.
MUNISPORT LANDFILL, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
July 26, 1990
The 291-acre Munisport Landfill site, including
a 170-acre, inactive municipal landfill, is within
the city of North Miami, Dade County, Florida.
The site is adjacent to the State Mangrove
Preserve, a wetlands area that is tidally
connected to Biscayne Bay. To minimize
contaminated surface water runoff from the
landfill, a dike was installed through the
Mangrove swamp at the southeast edge of the
site. This dike has hydrologically altered the
fauna and flora of the inland wetlands area.
The Biscayne aquifer underlies the Munisport
property and is the sole source of drinking
water for Dade County; however, the ground
water in the portion of the aquifer located
directly under the site is non-potable due to
high salt concentrations. The city of North
Miami leased 291 acres to Munisport for
recreational development in 1971 which begin
filling low-lying areas of the site with clean fill
and construction debris. In 1975, a temporary
permit allowed solid waste to be used as fill
above the water table However, in 1976, a
State inspection found twelve 55-gallon drums
that were leaking wastes onsite; a violation was
issued, and these drums were removed offsite
by the city. In 1977, Munisport applied for a
404 permit modification to dump additional
solid wastes in the wetlands. EPA opposed the
modification and in 1981, issued a CWA 404(c)
veto followed by an Administrative Order (AO)
that prohibited any additional filling and
required removal or realignment of the diking
at the Mangrove Preserve to restore the altered
wetland area. In 1981, the State directed
Munisport and the city to provide final closure
of the landfill. Landfilling operations ceased in
1981, but closure has not yet taken place.
Leachate from the landfill waste still poses a
significant threat to the aquatic organisms in
the Mangrove Preserve. The ground water is
no longer used for potable purposes as a result
of salt water intrusion. The contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water include
VOCs including benzene and toluene; other
organics including phenols; metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead; and other
inorganics.
The selected remedial action for the site
includes intercepting, collecting, and treating
the leachate-contaminated ground water prior
to its emergence into the Mangrove Preserve,
with onsite discharge of treated ground water;
initiating landfill closure proceedings by the
State; conducting hydrologic, water quality, and
treatability studies as part of the remedial
design. Based on the studies, the less favored
alternative remedy may include intercepting
the leachate-contaminated ground water plume
by constructing a hydraulic barrier using
negative pressure; treating the contaminated
ground water with air stripping,adjusting the
pH, and discharging the treated effluent into
onsite shallow subsurface trenches or onsite
surface water to enhance the treatment process;
and making hydrologic improvements to the
Mangrove Preserve and the altered wetlands.
Alternatively, the site may be treated by using
positive infiltration to provide the hydraulic
barrier, biological treatment to reduce the
contaminants, and discharging treated effluent
to an onsite trench to maintain a hydraulic
barrier. The estimated total present worth cost
for the negative-pressure remedial action is
$6,166,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $430,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Treated effluent will meet appropriate Clean
Water Act and State standards for discharge to
ground water or surface water, as appropriate;
however, no chemical-specific goals were
provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Biodegradation/LandApplication; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Inorganics; Landfill Closure; Lead; Metals;
O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; Phenols; Plume Management;
131
-------
Sole-Source Aquifer; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; Treatability
Studies; VOCs; Wetlands.
NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL, NC
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 465-acre National Starch and Chemical site
is a manufacturing facility for textile finishing
and custom speciality chemicals in Rowan
County, North Carolina. A portion of the site
is heavily wooded, and surrounding land use
is mixed industrial and residential. From 1971
to 1978, approximately 350,000 gallons of
reaction vessel wash water containing salt
brines, sulfuric acid solutions, and solvents
were disposed of onsite in unlined trenches.
Liquid plant production wastes also were
disposed of in the trenches after being held in
an unlined pretreatment lagoon. In 1976,
sampling by the site operator revealed shallow
ground water contamination in the trench area.
A State investigation in 1977 supported this
finding, and the State requested the site
operator to cease onsite liquid waste disposal
in the trench area. A 1988 Record of Decision
(ROD) addressed Operable Unit 1 (OU1), which
called for onsite ground water pumping and
treatment, further investigation of soil
contamination in the trench area, continued
surface water and sediment monitoring and a
supplemental remedial investigation (RI). This
ROD addresses OU2, and identifies no further
action as the remedy for the trench area soil
based on the supplemental RI. A subsequent
ROD will address OU3, the remediation of
onsite contaminated surface water and
sediment, which are unrelated to the trench soil
contamination. Results of the supplemental RI
indicate that the natural leaching process of
percolating rainfall will continue to reduce the
soil contamination level. Because the existing
ground water treatment system is designed to
treat contaminants leaching into the ground
water, there are no additional contaminants of
concern relating to the trench area soil.
The selected remedial action for OU2 is no
further action. Soil will be monitored on a
quarterly basis, and institutional controls
including deed restrictions will be
implemented. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $151,000, which
includes a total O&M cost of $150,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Institutional Controls; No Action
Remedy; O&M.
NORTH HOLLYWOOD DUMP, TN
First Remedial Action - Final
September 13, 1990
The 70-acre North Hollywood Dump site is an
inactive, privately owned landfill in Memphis,
Shelby County, Tennessee, in the Wolf River
floodplain. Directly beneath the site is a
contaminated aquifer from which ground water
discharges directly to the Wolf River. Adjacent
to the site are an abandoned dredge pond, a
beaver pond, and Oxbow Lake, all of which
were affected by the site. From the mid-1930s
until its closure in 1967, municipal and
industrial refuse were disposed of at the site,
which was operated by the city of Memphis.
A precise description of the materials disposed
of is unknown. In addition, unauthorized
dumping is thought to have occurred during
the 1970s. In 1979 and 1980, EPA and State
studies revealed various contaminants both
onsite and offsite in soil, sediment, ground
water, surface water, and fish. Commercial
fishing activities in the Wolf River ceased, and
EPA required removal of contaminated soil,
capping of the landfill, and fencing of the site.
The RI/FS process identified buried drums
onsite. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses all of the contaminated media by
containing the source areas, including the
landfill and onsite surface water bodies, with
provisions for offsite surface and shallow
ground water monitoring and treatment as
necessary. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris,
ground water, and surface water are organics
including pesticides, specifically aldrin, endrin
and chlordane; and metals including arsenic
and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating buried wastes and soil in
easily eroded areas near the edge of the landfill
and consolidating them in the landfill area;
excavating and characterizing waste within the
buried drums; consolidating debris in the
landfill or, should contaminant levels warrant
132
-------
it, properly disposing of debris as well as
drummed wastes offsite; upgrading the existing
landfill cover to be a total of 24 inches thick;
partially dewatering the surface impoundments;
excavating the contaminated sediment from the
beaver pond and placing them within Oxbow
Lake; covering the contaminated lake and
beaver pond sediment with a 36-inch hydraulic
geofabric cover, and infilling Oxbow Lake with
clean fill; harvesting contaminated fish from the
abandoned dredge pond; hydraulically
containing the contaminated dredge pond
sediment with geofabric and three feet of clean
fill; refilling the pond with water and
restocking with unaffected fish; monitoring the
shallow ground water, with provisions for
future pumping and treatment if necessary;
conducting surface water (both onsite and
offsite), air, and biota monitoring; and
implementing institutional controls to restrict
onsite land use and to prohibit well installation
in the vicinity, and site access restrictions
including fencing. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $8,041,890,
which includes a total O&M cost of $1,610,310.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Specific goals for ground water include arsenic
0.140 ug/1 (proposed State Water Quality
Standard) and lead 3.8 ug/1 (CWA Water
Quality Criteria) at the point the ground water
reaches the Wolf River.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Construction of
wells in the vicinity is not permitted, as county
regulations prohibit the placement of wells
within a floodplain. Onsite land use
restrictions will also be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Dredging;
Excavation; Filling; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Organics;
Pesticides; Sediment; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Water Quality Criteria.
PICKETTVILLE ROAD LANDFILL, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 52-acre Pickettville Road Landfill site is an
inactive municipal landfill in Jacksonville,
Duval County, Florida. The area is rural with
mixed industrial and residential usage.
Adjacent to the site is Little Sixmile Creek to
the east, which empties into Sixmile Creek to
the north of the site. Waste debris from the
landfill is present within the 100-year
floodplain of Sixmile Creek. The site overlies
a surficial sand aquifer and a deeper limestone
aquifer. From the 1940s to the 1960s, the site
was used primarily as a sand borrow pit.
From 1968, when landfilling operations began,
to 1971, the municipal landfill accepted all
types of wastes. Subsequently, the landfill
accepted hazardous wastes exclusively. Types
of wastes disposed of onsite included waste oil,
lead-acid battery liquid waste, battery casings,
terpene sludge, and PCBs. County site
inspections in 1975 and 1976, revealed many
improper waste disposal and maintenance
practices, and the landfill was closed in 1977.
These disposal practices resulted in leaching of
wastes into Sixmile Creek, the ground water
and soil. Several investigations from 1979 to
1990, characterized the affected media and the
nature and extent of onsite and offsite
contamination. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses both source control and management
of contaminant migration, and is a final remedy
for the site. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, debris, and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, TCE, and
toluene; other organics including acids, PCBs;
and metals including arsenic, chromium, and
lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating the waste, soil, and debris
from the 100-year floodplain of Sixmile Creek
to a depth of five feet, followed by onsite
disposal of waste and debris within the landfill
area; capping the landfill with a clay and soil
cover; installing a passive landfill gas venting
system; providing an alternate water supply to
residents affected by the ground water
contaminant plume by extending a city water
main, implementing a plugging and
abandonment program for the affected wells;
ground water monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls including ground water
use and deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions, such as fencing. The estimated
133
-------
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$9,935,000, which includes an estimated annual
O&M cost of $171,100 for 20 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Surface water discharge limits are SARA
Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs), and
include benzene 115 ug/1 and vinyl chloride
115 ug/1. Ground water discharge, which
exceeds ACLs may indicate the need for future
ground water remediation.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use and deed restrictions will be implemented
at the site.
KEYWORDS: Acids; ACLs; Alternate Water
Supply; Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLGs; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Organics; PCBs;
Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; Venting; VOCs; Water Quality
Criteria.
SCHUYLKILL METAL, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 17-acre Schuylkill Metal site is a former
battery recycling facility containing marsh areas
in the southwest portion of Plant City,
Hillsborough County, Florida. From 1972 to
1986, the facility was used to recycle lead from
batteries; the lead was subsequently sent offsite
for smelter processing. Wastes generated in the
recycling process included rubber and plastic
chips from battery casings and sulfuric acid
solution. In 1980, the State required the
removal of approximately 250 tons of sediment
from a disposal pond, 3,000 tons of battery
casings, and 500 tons of soil underlying the
battery casings. Prior to 1981, acidic
washdown wastewaters were stored in a
2.2-acre, unlined wastewater holding pond, and
neutralized with lime or ammonia. In 1981, the
facility upgraded the wastewater treatment
system, and acidic rinse washdown wastewaters
were neutralized with sodium hydroxide and
discharged into the city's treatment plant. Site
investigations conducted in 1981 revealed that
onsite surficial aquifer monitoring wells
contained elevated levels of ammonia.
Analyses of soil, surface water, and sediment
samples near the processing area and around
the holding pond revealed elevated
concentrations of metals. This Record of
Decision (ROD) provides a final remedy and
addresses all contaminants at the site. The
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
debris, sediment, ground water, and surface
water are acids and metals including lead,
arsenic, and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation and onsite solidification of
approximately 36,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil from the process area and
approximately 2,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sediment from the ditches; onsite
disposal of treated soil and sediment; debris
recycling; onsite treatment of surface water
from the wastewater holding pond and
pumping and treatment of ground water by
chemical action and filtration, followed by
offsite discharge of the treated surface and
ground water to a publicly owned treatment
works (POTW) or to surface water; biological
monitoring of the east and west onsite marshes;
installing flood control mechanisms to maintain
continued surface water inundation in the east
marsh; mitigating the wetlands that have been
adversely impacted by the site; and
implementing of site access restrictions
including fencing. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action ranges from
$5,864,000 to $8,161,000, depending on O&M
costs, which will be estimated during the
RD/RA phase.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All soil with lead levels of 500 mg/kg and
ditch sediment to a depth of 2 feet will be
treated by chemical stabilization. This cleanup
level was based onsite-specific analyses to
prevent excessive lead leaching to the ground
water. Debris will be excavated to a depth of
between 3 and 10 feet below land surface and
will be recycled. Ground water cleanup level
is lead 0.015 mg/1 (MCLs or background
levels), and treated water discharged to nearby
wetlands will achieve lead levels of 0.013 mg/1
(WQC). The Ambient Water Quality Criteria
for the existing marsh and for surface water
has been waived, due to the potential for
destructive effects of the remediation on the
wetlands.
134
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented in marsh areas.
KEYWORDS: Acids; ARAR Waiver; Arsenic;
Background Levels; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization;
Surface Water; Surface Water Treatment;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
SCRDI BLUFF ROAD, SC
First Remedial Action - Final
September 12, 1990
The 4-acre SCRDI Bluff Road site is an inactive
chemical waste manufacturing, storage,
recycling, and disposal facility in Richland
County, South Carolina. Surrounding land use
is rural residential and industrial, and part of
the site has been classified as a wetlands area.
The site was first used as an industrial facility,
which manufactured acetylene gas. Two
lagoons were constructed onsite to support this
operation. Starting in 1975, the site was used
as a storage, recycling, and disposal facility for
chemical waste. An above-ground storage tank
was installed for use in these processes. All
operations at the site ceased in 1982 after State
investigations identified onsite soil and ground
water contamination. From 1982 to 1983, the
State addressed the site contamination and
required the removal of over 7,500 drums
containing various chemicals, visibly
contaminated soil, and above-ground structures.
Additionally, in 1989, the storage tank
containing approximately 100 gallons of
contaminated sludge was removed. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
remediation of both the contaminant source and
ground water, and provides a final remedy for
the site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, toluene, PCE, TCE, and
xylenes, other organics including PCBs,
phenols, and pesticides; and metals.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and onsite treatment of
ground water using flocculation/precipitation as
a pretreatment to remove metals, air stripping
to remove VOCs, and granular activated carbon
adsorption to remove semi-volatile organic
compounds, if necessary, followed by
reinjecting the treated water onsite; treating
contaminated soil in-situ using vacuum
extraction, followed by carbon adsorption or
fume incineration to destroy off-gases;
managing carbon residuals from ground water
and soil treatments through offsite disposal or
regeneration; and monitoring soil and ground
water. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $5,574,984, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $311,287 for
16 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup standards for ground water are the
more stringent of Federal or State MCLs or
proposed MCLs. Chemical-specific ground
water goals include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
PCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), toluene
2 mg/1 (MCL), and xylenes 10 mg/1 (MCL).
Soil cleanup levels were calculated using a soil
leachability.
YELLOW WATER ROAD, FL
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 14-acre Yellow Water Road site is a former
storage area for PCB-contaminated liquids and
electrical equipment in Baldwin, Duval County,
Florida. Dense woodlands are located along
the perimeter of the site, and surrounding land
use is commercial and residential. In 1981,
onsite storage of PCB-contaminated liquids and
electrical equipment began at the former
operational area in anticipation of upcoming
onsite incineration operations, but the proper
permits for the incinerator were never obtained.
Subsequently in 1982, PCB-contaminated oils
were spilled at the site as a result of onsite
salvage operation which included metal
removal from transformers. As a result of this
onsite PCB contamination, EPA conducted a
removal action in 1984 that included cleaning
and storing 719 electrical transformers, securing
100,000 gallons of PCB liquids in onsite holding
tanks, and excavating and storing 3,000 cubic
yards of PCB-contaminated soil onsite. In 1988,
EPA directed a second removal action which
included demolishing an onsite warehouse;
disposing of warehouse debris and stockpiling
contaminated soil offsite; incinerating 78,854
gallons of PCB liquids offsite; and disposing of
135
-------
704 transformers and 18,690 pounds of
capacitors offsite. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses the remediation of
PCB-contaminated soil and sediment. Onsite
ground water contamination will be addressed
in a subsequent ROD. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
sediment are organics including PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 3,560 cubic yards of onsite
contaminated soil and sediment with PCB
concentrations greater than 10 mg/kg;
solidifying and stabilizing the soil and
sediment, if a treatability study determines the
effectiveness of using solidification for organics;
placing treated soil within the old salvage
operational area and covering the area with
1-foot-thick soil cover; conducting teachability
studies of the treated mass; backfilling
excavated areas with clean soil and revegetating
the site; implementing site access restrictions
including fencing; conducting ground water
monitoring; and abandoning ground water
wells within the excavated area, if necessary.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action ranges from $1,119,000 to
$1,448,200, (depending on the soil disposal
method used), which includes a total O&M cost
of $62,600 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Onsite soil cleanup levels are based on the
TSCA PCB Spill Cleanup Policy for unrestricted
sites. PCBs will be remediated to a level of
10 mg/kg with a minimum excavation depth of
10 inches, and excavated areas will be covered
with clean fill to reduce levels of PCBs to less
than 1 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water Monitoring;
Leachability Tests; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCBs; Sediment; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology.
ZELLWOOD GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION, FL
First Remedial Action (Amendment)
March 1, 1990
The 57-acre Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination site is approximately 1/2-mile
west of the town of Zellwood in Orange
County, Florida. The site is situated in a rural
area, and approximately 300 homes located
within one mile of the site depend on private
wells for their potable water supply. The site
is comprised of four active industries and an
open field with marshy wetlands. Prior to
1963, the area was used by several
agriculturally related businesses. In 1963, a
drum recycling facility began operations at the
site. During the drum recycling process, onsite
wastewaters were generated by draining and
cleaning procedures, and two onsite
evaporation/percolation ponds (#1 and #2) were
used in the treatment and disposal of the
wastewaters. A new treatment system was
installed in 1980 and use of the ponds was
discontinued. In 1981, the site owners drained
the two ponds and moved some of the
contaminated sediment to an offsite landfill.
The remainder of the contaminated sediment
was consolidated into a temporary sludge
storage area before the sediment was moved
offsite in 1982 and the onsite ponds were filled
in. In 1982, EPA identified an abandoned
drum storage area by a 6-acre field at the
northern part of the site, which was apparently
used for the disposal of drums and other
wastes. Site investigations by EPA from 1988
to 1990 identified contamination in the soil,
sediment, and ground water at the site. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
remediation of onsite source areas. Ground
water remediation will be addressed in a
subsequent ROD. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and sediment are
VOCs including PCE, toluene and xylenes;
other organics including PAHs and pesticides;
and metals including lead and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 3,000 cubic
yards of contaminated soil and sediment from
the ditch, drum, and pond areas, followed by
onsite stabilization and solidification of the soil
and sediment; replacing the stabilized soil and
sediment into the excavation area, covering the
area with top soil and reseeding the area;
evaluating existing ground water wells for
decommissioning; and ground water
136
-------
monitoring. This ROD amends a 1987 ROD,
which proposed treatment of contaminated soil
and sediment by incineration with disposal of
the residual ash onsite. The estimated total
cost for this remedial action is $1,030,000,
which includes an estimated total O&M cost of
$250,000 over 10 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup criteria were calculated using site
specific soil and climatic data from the EPA,
State, and other sources. Chemical-specific
goals for soil include lead 220 mg/kg,
chromium 100 mg/kg, total PAHs 10 mg/kg,
PCE 1 mg/kg, toluene 30 mg/kg, and total
xylenes 5 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Ground Water Monitoring; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Pesticides; RCRA;
ROD Amendment; Sediment; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; PCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
137
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 5
(Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin)
ALGOMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, WI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1990
The 13-acre Algoma Municipal Landfill site is
an inactive municipal landfill in Algoma,
Kewaunee County, Wisconsin. Surrounding
land use is primarily agricultural/rural
residential with wetlands adjacent to the site.
The site overlies an aquifer that currently
supplies water to private wells. From 1969 to
1983, the site was operated as a municipal
landfill comprised of 3 distinct landfill areas.
Solvents, thinners, lacquers, as well as
municipal wastes were reportedly disposed of
in the main landfill area known as the Landfill
Disposal Area (LDA). Two smaller areas, the
North Disposal Area (NDA) and the South
Disposal Area (SDA) were reportedly used for
the disposal of construction debris and
asbestos-contaminated sludge. Approximately
400,000 cubic yards of municipal wastes were
disposed of at the site. In 1983, the landfill
was closed and the wastes were covered.
However, over time, the cap has deteriorated
due to weather and lack of protection from
freezing and thawing. Therefore, the current
cover has not been impermeable and landfill
contaminants have been released into the
ground water. EPA site investigations
conducted in 1984 and 1989 revealed onsite
ground water contamination caused by sources
leaching from the LDA. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses the remediation of
contaminated source and ground water. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water, soil, and debris are VOCs
including benzene; other organics; and metals
including arsenic and cadmium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes capping the LDA with a soil/clay
cover and installing a gas venting system to
remove off-gases; covering the SDA and NDA
with a soil cover, if further waste
characterization determines these areas to be
sources of asbestos contamination; monitoring
ground water onsite, offsite, and in nearby
private wells to determine the effectiveness of
the landfill cap in controlling the migration of
contaminants into ground water; monitoring
landfill gases; and implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions, and site
access restrictions such as fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,298,000, which includes a total
O&M cost of $11,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The State has determined that contaminant
migration from the landfill to ground water
must not exceed State Prevention Action Limits
(PALs), including benzene 0.067 ug/1 (PAL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Debris; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Organics; Plume Management;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Venting; VOCs;
Wetlands.
ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT, MI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 12.5-acre Anderson Development site is an
active chemical manufacturing facility in
Adrian, Madison Township, Lenawee County,
Michigan. The site is in a 40-acre industrial
park, and is comprised of several areas of
contamination that exceed health-based levels,
including a 0.5-acre former process wastewater
pretreatment lagoon containing lagoon sludge,
clay underlying the lagoon, and a small
quantity of soil near the lagoon. From 1970 to
1979, the plant produced 4,4-methylene
bis(2-chloroaniline) (MBOCA), a hardening
agent for the production of polyurethane
plastics. Process wastewater was discharged
directly to surface water until 1973, when it
was discharged to a publicly owned treatment
works (POTW). In 1979, the State ordered the
POTW not to accept the waste stream because
of the decreased efficiency of the POTW
resulting from MBOCA. In 1980 and 1981, the
site owner and the State performed a cleanup
action of all contaminated site areas with levels
138
-------
of MBOCA above 1 ppm. This included
decontaminating the plant, sweeping streets,
shampooing/vacuuming residential carpet, and
removing some surface soil. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses the remediation of
the pretreatment lagoon area. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting soil and
lagoon sludge are organics, namely MBOCA
and its degradation products.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing and treating standing water
in the lagoon; excavating contaminated soil,
clay, and lagoon sludge from a 100-foot by
75-foot area and placing the material in an
unexcavated portion of the lagoon; treating the
contaminated material by in-situ vitrification;
collecting pyrolized gases, and treating the
gases using a scrubber system, air filters, and
carbon adsorption beds; filling the lagoon
containing the vitrified material with clean fill;
and conducting ground water monitoring and
soil sampling. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $2,364,050,
which includes a total O&M cost of $38,530
over 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS: A
cleanup action level of MBOCA 1,684 ug/kg
was calculated based upon EPA guidance
documentation. The cleanup level corresponds
with the excess lifetime cancer risk level of 10"6.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Dredging; Excavation; Ground Water
Monitoring; O&M; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; RCRA; Sludge; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Treatment; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Vitrification.
BOFORS NOBEL, MI
First Remedial Action
September 17, 1990
The 85-acre Bofors Nobel site is an active
specialty chemical production plant in Edelston
Township, Muskegon County, Michigan. An
inactive landfill is also located in the eastern
portion of the site. Onsite wetlands lie within
icthe floodplain of Big Black Creek, which runs
through the southern portion of the site. The
site overlies a lacustrine aquifer, a potential
drinking water source, which has been
contaminated as a result of site activities.
During the 1960s and early 1970s, sludge,
wastewater, and waste liquids from plant
operations were discharged into 10 onsite
lagoons. Subsequent investigations by EPA
have identified eight of the onsite lagoons as
potential sources of ground water
contamination. In 1976, the State restricted
wastewater discharge from the site, and a
ground water pump and treatment system was
installed to treat contaminated ground water in
the lacustrine aquifer. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation of the lagoons, as
well as upgrading the current ground water
treatment system. A subsequent final ROD will
address other contaminated soil and complete
restoration of the aquifer. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sludge, and ground water are VOCs including
benzene.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 101,000 cubic
yards of sludge and berm material highly
contaminated with VOCs, treating the
contaminated material onsite using incineration
and low temperature thermal desorption,
disposing of the residual ash in an onsite
landfill, and treating scrubber water from the
incinerator by precipitation; treating landfill
leachate in the ground water treatment system;
excavating approximately 372,000 cubic yards of
less VOC-contaminated soil and sludge and
disposing of these wastes onsite in the landfill;
pumping and treatment of ground water using
ozone oxidation or a comparable treatment with
onsite discharge to surface water; monitoring
ground water, surface water, and air; and
implementing site access restrictions including
fencing. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $70,874,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $313,000 for
43 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Landfilled material must exhibit an excess
lifetime cancer risk of less than 10*
Chemical-specific soil cleanup levels were
developed based on the type and location of
contaminated media within or adjacent to the
lagoons including benzene 410 to 4,500 ug/kg.
Ground water cleanup levels are based on
proposed Best Available Technology discharge
standards including benzene 5.0 ug/1.
139
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Leachability Tests; MCLs; MCLGs;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sludge; Soil; Solvents;
State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.
CLARE WATER SUPPLY, MI
First Remedial Action
August 30, 1990
The Clare Water Supply site is the public water
supply system for the city of Clare, Clare
County, Michigan. The Clare Water Supply
system withdraws ground water from four
municipal wells (MW) in the site wellfield, each
tapping an unconsolidated sand aquifer. In
1981, ground water sampling revealed
contaminants including chlorinated
hydrocarbons in two of the wells (MW #2 and
MW #5) in the northeastern portion of the site.
An industrial area containing approximately 14
manufacturing and retailing businesses operates
west of the contaminated wells. Soil samples
extracted from this industrial area indicate soil
contaminated with TCE and DCE. In addition,
a nearby settling lagoon contains solvents and
heavily contaminated sediment. EPA
conducted a short-term study that determined
that the major source of ground water
contamination resulted from contaminants
leaching out of soil on the industrial properties,
entering a shallow perched aquifer, and
migrating to the deeper aquifer that serves the
municipal wellfield. The Clare Water Supply
wellfield is the sole source of drinking water
for the community. Remedial actions for this
site will focus on two Operable Units (OUs).
This Record of Decision (ROD) provides an
interim remedy, which addresses TCE
contamination of the drinking water supply. A
subsequent ROD will address OU2, the
remaining ground water contaminants as well
as soil contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including TCE.
The selected remedial action for this interim
remedy includes installing and operating an air
stripper to treat the ground water, modifying
pipelines on the existing water supply system,
monitoring treated water from the air stripper
prior to its release into the water supply
system, and monitoring air emissions from the
air stripper. The estimated present worth cost
for this interim remedial action is $1,284,059,
which includes an annual O&M cost of $61,000
for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This ROD will remediate ground water TCE
and TCE-degradation components to meet Safe
Drinking Water Act MCLs including TCE
5.0 ug/1. Additional chemical-specific ground
water goals will be determined in the
subsequent ROD.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy; MCLs; Municipally
Owned Site; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source
Aquifer; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
FISHER CALO CHEM, IN
First Remedial Action - Final
August 7, 1990
The Fisher Calo Chem site is in LaPorte
County, Indiana. The site is comprised of the
33-acre One-Line Road facility, the 340-acre
Two-Line Road facility, and the 170-acre Space
Leasing facility. Surrounding the site are
woodlands, grasslands, wetlands, and a wildlife
area. Site contamination at all three facilities is
the result of the production and distribution of
industrial chemicals, and reclamation of waste
paint and metal finishing solvents. From 1970
to 1985, packaging and storage violations were
documented by the State during investigations.
In 1979 when the State excavated buried drums
from the One-Line Road facility, additional
onsite contamination was identified. In 1982,
EPA initiated site investigations that revealed
elevated levels of organic compounds in
ground water, heavy metals in the soil, and
evidence of additional buried drums. Sampling
140
-------
and analysis continued until 1988, when EPA
initiated a removal action to dispose of drums,
tanks, and containers at the Two-Line Road
facility. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses the remaining contaminated areas
including the soil, waste material, and
structures at the site, and contaminated ground
water in aquifers underlying the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including TCE, toluene, xylenes; other organics
including PAHs and PCBs; and asbestos.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation and incineration of
semi-volatile and PCB-contaminated soil, with
ash disposal location to be determined upon
leaching test results; treatment of
VOC-contaminated soil remaining in the
excavated area using soil flushing or vapor
extraction; limited asbestos removal/repair of
structures and offsite disposal of any
asbestos-containing materials, drums, tanks, or
containers and their contents; treating ground
water using an equalization/sedimentation
basin, granular activated carbon, and air
stripping, followed by filtration and reinjection
of the treated water into the shallow aquifer to
enhance soil ground water monitoring; and
implementation of site access restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $31,685,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $9,379.000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Excavation levels for contaminated soil are
based on TSCA standards and TBC criteria
including PCBs 10 mg/kg. Ground water
cleanup levels are derived from action levels
adopted by the State from SDWA MCLs and
MCLGs, including TCE 5 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Asbestos; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Inorganics; Leachability Tests; MCLGs; MCLs;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs; PCBs; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; Toxic
Substances Control Act; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Xylenes.
HAGEN FARM, WI
First Remedial Action
September 17, 1990
The 10-acre Hagen Farm site is a former waste
disposal facility in Dade County, Wisconsin.
This site is in a rural area that is dominated by
sand and gravel mining and agricultural
activities. From 1950 to 1966, waste materials
were disposed of in three subareas of the site's
defined area of contamination. Onsite
investigations indicate that subarea A, a 6-acre
area in the southern portion of the site,
contains industrial wastes consisting of solvents
and various other organics as well as municipal
waste, whereas subareas B and C, each 1.5-acre
areas in the northeastern portion of the site,
appear to contain only scattered municipal
wastes. Site investigations have determined the
need for two concurrent operable units. The
source control operable unit, which is defined
in this Record of Decision (ROD), addresses the
waste refuse and subsurface soil at areas A, B,
and C with the goal of controlling the
migration of the waste refuse and sub-soil and
reducing the volume of contaminants from the
waste and sub-soil to the ground water. The
ground water operable unit will be addressed
in a subsequent ROD. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
waste refuse are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, xylenes; other organics including
phenols and PCBs; and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes consolidating waste materials from
disposal areas B and C into disposal area A
and backfilling excavated depression areas
within disposal areas B and C with clean soil,
followed by revegetation; capping disposal area
A after consolidation; treating 67,650 cubic
yards of waste and 112,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sub-soil materials in disposal area
A using in-situ vapor extraction (ISVE) and
treating off-gas emissions using carbon
adsorption, followed by regenerating the spent
carbon from the off-gas treatment process; and
implementing site access restrictions and
institutional controls including deed restrictions
to prevent installation of drinking water wells
and to protect the integrity of the cap. The
141
-------
estimated present worth cost for the remedial
action is $3,299,000 which includes an annual
O&M cost of $29,530 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The goal of the ISVE will be a 90% removal of
the VOCs from the waste and contaminated
sub-soil. Off-gas extracts from the ISVE will be
treated to meet State emission standards.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
disturbances of the consolidated capped
material.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Phenols; Soil;
Solvents; State Standards/Regulations; Toluene;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Xylenes.
HUNTS DISPOSAL, WI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1990
The 84-acre Hunts Disposal site is an inactive
landfill in Caledonia Township, Racine County,
Wisconsin. Onsite features include a 35-acre
landfill surrounded by woodlands, wetlands,
agricultural areas, and a lake. Part of the site
that includes the landfill is within the 100-year
floodplain of the Root River. The site overlies
a contaminated surficial sand and gravel
aquifer. Prior to 1959, when onsite landfilling
operations began, the site was a sand and
gravel pit. By 1961, municipal and industrial
wastes were dumped and burned in an onsite
open pit. Approximately 620,000 cubic yards of
waste is currently landfilled onsite, with 168,000
cubic yards present below the water table.
Specific wastes disposed of onsite included
waste newspaper ink, spent solvents, tannery
wastes, chromic acids, arsenic acid, and
beryllium. Because State site inspections
revealed improper landfilling practices, the
State ordered the landfill to close in 1974. EPA
investigations conducted in 1984 and 1988
characterized contaminated media and
determined the extent of onsite contamination.
The primary contaminant migration pathway is
onsite ground water, which is contaminated by
wastes leaching from the eroded landfill cap
and from wastes below the water table. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses both
source control and management of contaminant
migration. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
TCE, and xylenes; acids; and metals including
arsenic and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating and consolidating 5,300
cubic yards of onsite contaminated soil and
sediment from outside the landfill area to
within the landfill, and filling excavated areas
with clean soil; constructing a levee to prevent
erosion of the landfill during floods; capping
the landfill with a multi-layer clay and soil
cover; installing an active landfill gas collection
and combustion system; constructing a slurry
wall intersecting the cap and a subsurface
confining layer to hydraulically contain
contaminated ground water; pumping and
offsite treatment of ground water, followed by
offsite discharge; and implementing institutional
controls including land and ground water use
and deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions such as fencing. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$17,454,000, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $375,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels chosen for the site
are State Preventive Action Limits (PALs),
which are equal to, or more stringent than
Federal MCLs. Ground water chemical-specific
goals include benzene 1 ug/1, TCE 0.18 ug/1,
xylenes 124 ug/1, arsenic 5 ug/I, and chromium
5 ug/1. Specific cleanup standards for soil and
sediment have not been set.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land and
ground water use, and deed restrictions will be
implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS:
Acids; Arsenic; Benzene;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Water Act; Closure Requirements; Debris;
Deferred Decision; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Levees; MCLGs; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Containment; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Slurry Wall; Soil; State
142
-------
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
JANESVILLE ASH BEDS, WI
First Remedial Action - Final
December 29, 1989
The Janesville Ash Beds site is being
remediated concurrently with the Janesville Old
Landfill site and two nearby, non-NPL sites,
the Janesville Old Dump and the Janesville
New Landfill sites. These four sites comprise
the 65-acre Janesville Disposal Facility (JDF) in
Janesville, Wisconsin. The Janesville Ash Beds
(JAB) site, which is RCRA regulated, operated
from 1974 to 1985 and consisted of five ash
beds in which industrial liquids and sludge
were deposited and allowed to evaporate or
dry. Although the JAB site was excavated,
closed and capped with clay, it is a source of
ground water contamination and possibly
surface water contamination in the nearby Rock
River. The second NPL site, the 18-acre
Janesville Old Landfill site was operated from
1963 to 1978, accepting both municipal and
industrial wastes. The site was capped with
silty sand and sandy clay at the time of closure
in 1978, but was subsequently shown to be
contributing to air and ground water
contamination. Two other contingent sites are
also included as part of this remedy because of
their proximity to the two NPL sites. A 1986
Consent Order authorized that the four sites
comprising the JDF would be addressed in one
remedial investigation under the joint authority
of CERCLA and RCRA. The 16-acre Janesville
New Landfill site was operated from 1978 to
1985 and accepted municipal and industrial
wastes. The site is also a possible source of air
and ground water contamination. The second
additional site is the 15-acre Janesville Old
Dump site which was operated from 1950 to
1963 as a general refuse dump, accepting
unknown types of waste. This site does not
significantly contaminate the JDF area. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water and air are VOCs including
benzene, PCE, and TCE; and metals including
arsenic.
Remedial activities at the JDF site will be
implemented at three of the sites and include
upgrading the landfill cap, and providing site
drainage as needed, at the JAB site; treating the
landfill gas by extraction and flaring, upgrading
the landfill cap, and air monitoring at the Old
Landfill site; and treating the landfill gas by
extraction and flaring, upgrading the landfill
cap, improving the leachate collection system,
and air monitoring at the New Landfill site.
No further action will be implemented at the
Janesville Old Dump site. Overall,
contaminated ground water at the JDF site will
be pumped and treated onsite by air stripping,
with discharge to Rock River, in conjunction
with ground water monitoring. Ground water
and land use and deed restrictions will be
implemented at each site. The estimated
present worth cost for the Janesville Ash Beds
site is $1,020,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost ranging from $33,100 to $53,100.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will be treated to attain Federal
MCLs or State standards. Surface water will
meet State surface water quality standards.
Chemical-specific cleanup goals were not
provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented to assure
that future use of the site does not increase the
potential release of hazardous substances.
Deed and ground water use restrictions for the
area between the JDF site and the neighboring
Rock River will also be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Air
Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; VOCs.
JANESVILLE OLD LANDFILL, WI
First Remedial Action - Final
December 29, 1989
The Janesville Old Landfill site is being
remediated concurrently with the Janesville Ash
Beds site and two nearby, non-NPL sites, the
Janesville Old Dump and the Janesville New
Landfill sites. These four sites comprise the
65-acre Janesville Disposal Facility (JDF) in
Janesville, Wisconsin. The 18-acre Janesville
Old Landfill site was operated from 1963 to
143
-------
1978, accepting both municipal and industrial
wastes. The site was capped with silty sand
and sandy clay at the time of closure in 1978,
but was subsequently shown to be contributing
to air and ground water contamination. The
second NPL site, Janesville Ash Beds (JAB) site,
was operated from 1974 to 1985 and consisted
of five ash beds in which industrial liquids and
sludge were deposited and allowed to
evaporate or dry. Although the JAB site was
excavated, closed and capped with clay, it is a
source of ground water contamination and
possibly surface water contamination in the
nearby Rock River. Two other contingent sites
are also included as part of this remedy
because of their proximity to the two NPL
sites. A 1986 Consent Order authorized that
the four sites comprising the JDF would be
addressed in one remedial investigation under
the joint authority of CERCLA and RCRA. The
16-acre Janesville New Landfill site was
operated from 1978 to 1985 and accepted
municipal and industrial wastes. The site is
also a possible source of air and ground water
contamination. The second additional site is
the 15-acre Janesville Old Dump site which was
operated from 1950 to 1963 as a general refuse
dump, accepting unknown types of waste.
This site does not significantly contaminate the
JDF area. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water and air are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, and TCE; and
metals including arsenic.
Remedial activities at the JDF site will be
implemented at three of the sites and include
treating the landfill gas by extraction and
flaring, upgrading the landfill cap, and air
monitoring at the Old Landfill site; upgrading
the landfill cap, and providing site drainage as
needed, at the JAB site; and treating the landfill
gas by extraction and flaring, upgrading the
landfill cap, improving the leachate collection
system, and air monitoring at the New Landfill
site. No further action will be implemented at
the Janesville Old Dump site. Overall,
contaminated ground water at the JDF site will
be pumped and treated onsite by air stripping,
with discharge to Rock River, in conjunction
with ground water monitoring. Ground water,
land use and deed restrictions will be
implemented at each site. The estimated
present worth cost for the Old Landfill site is
$6,059,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
ranging from $71,500 to $174,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will be treated to attain Federal
MCLs or State standards. Surface water will
meet State surface water quality standards.
Chemical-specific cleanup goals were not
provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented to assure
that future use of the site does not increase the
potential release of hazardous substances.
Deed and ground water use restrictions for the
area between the JDF site and the neighboring
Rock River will also be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Air
Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; Metals; No Action
Remedy; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Onsite
Containment; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; VOCs.
K&L LANDFILL, MI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 87-acre K&L Landfill site is an inactive
municipal landfill in Oshtemo Township,
Kalamazoo County, Michigan. Surrounding
land use is rural-residential with several nearby
small lakes and ponds. The site overlies two
sand and gravel aquifers (shallow and deep),
which are not apparently hydraulically
connected, but both are area drinking water
sources. From the early 1960s to 1979,
approximately 5 million cubic yards of refuse
and an unknown quantity of liquid and
drummed chemical wastes were accepted at the
landfill. In 1972, the State notified the site
owners to stop accepting chemical wastes, but
the request was ignored. Residential well
testing in 1976, 1978, and 1979 revealed ground
water contamination. In 1979, the State ordered
the landfill to cease operations, to supply an
alternate water supply to affected residents, and
to cover the landfill. This Record of Decision
(ROD) provides a final remedy and addresses
contaminated ground water in the shallow
aquifer. The primary contaminants of concern
present in the landfill affecting the soil, debris,
and ground water are VOCs including benzene,
144
-------
toluene, and xylenes; other organics including
acids, PAHs, PCBs, and phenols; and metals
including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes capping approximately 83 acres of
landfill area with a RCRA multi-layer cap and
installing gas vents throughout the landfill;
pumping and onsite treatment of ground water
using enhanced bioremediation/fixed-film
bioreactor technology accompanied by aeration;
conducting treatability studies or pilot tests to
ensure the effectiveness of the selected
technology; discharging the treated effluent by
either onsite reinjection, discharge to an onsite
filtration pond, or offsite discharge of ground
water to a publicly owned treatment works
(POTW); disposing offsite of any resulting
sludge; continued ground water, surface water,
and air monitoring; closure and abandonment
of affected residential wells; implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions
to limit ground water and land use, and site
access restrictions such as fencing. The
estimated present worth cost of this remedial
action is $16,407,100, which includes a total
O&M cost of $1,099,900 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Remedial goals are based upon reduction of
excess life-time cancer risks to 104 to 10"6 for
carcinogens. For non-carcinogens, the Hazard
Index (HI) will be reduced to 1 or less.
Chemical-specific goals for ground water
include acetone 700 ug/1 (State), benzene
1.0 ug/1 (State), toluene 40 ug/1 (State), vinyl
chloride 0.02 ug/1 (State), xylenes 20 ug/1
(State), phenols 300 ug/1 (State), and lead
5.0 ug/1 (State).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions limiting ground water and land use
will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Aeration; Air Monitoring;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Capping;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Closure
Requirements; Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure;
Leachability Tests; Lead; MCLGs; MCLs; Metals;
Municipally Owned Site; O&M; Offsite
Discharge; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; Phenols;
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW);
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; Toluene; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Venting; VOCs; Xylenes.
KUMMER SANITARY LANDFILL, MN
Third Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1990
The 35-acre Kummer Sanitary Landfill site is an
inactive mixed municipal waste landfill in
Northern Township, Beltrami County,
Minnesota, approximately one mile west of
Lake Bemidji. A large residential area lies
approximately 1,000 feet east of the site, and
there is a hospital directly southwest. The
privately owned landfill was operated from
1971 until 1985; however, business records for
the site are virtually nonexistent. Operations at
the landfill caused the State to take a number
of administrative and enforcement actions.
Following the discovery of ground water
contamination in Northern Township in 1984,
the State issued a public health advisory
concerning the well water and provided a
temporary water supply. Two previous
Records of Decision (RODs) in 1985 and 1988
documented the provision of an alternative
water supply for the Northern municipal water
system as Operable Unit 1 (OU1), and a source
control Operable Unit (OU2), which included a
cover system to control the source of
contamination (OU3). This final ROD
addresses ground water contamination. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes ground water pumping and treatment
using advanced oxidation processes (e.g., ozone,
hydrogen peroxide, or ultraviolet light), and
lime soda softening, as necessary, to precipitate
alkalinity and other inorganic compounds,
followed by disposal of the precipitate sludge,
polishing the effluent stream with granulated
activated carbon, and discharging treated
ground water to an onsite infiltration pond;
and ground water monitoring. Treatability
studies for bioremediation as a more
cost-effective remedy are planned; however, the
ROD will be amended if the treatment is
changed to biotreatment. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is
$1,800,000-$6,200,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $240,000-$510,000 for 30 years.
145
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminants of concern in the ground water
will be reduced to meet current and proposed
Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs)
including PCE 5 ug/1 (proposed MCL), TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL), and benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL);
thereby reducing cumulative residual
carcinogenic risk due to ingestion to 10*.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
MCLs; MCLGs; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; PCE; Plume Management; Safe
Drinking Water Act; TCE; Treatability Studies;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
MASTER DISPOSAL SERVICE
LANDFILL, WI
First Remedial Action
September 26, 1990
The 26-acre Master Disposal Service Landfill
site is an inactive industrial landfill in the
Town of Brookfield, Waukesha County,
Wisconsin. The site lies within the marshy
floodplain of the Fox River and is partially
surrounded by wetlands and drainage channels.
The site overlies a surficial sand/gravel and
dolomite aquifer system, which has been
contaminated by onsite disposal activities.
Onsite disposal of mainly industrial foundry
sands and slags occurred between 1967 and
1982. Onsite disposal of hazardous wastes
including inks, sludge, and solvents was also
observed during this period. The site was
partially closed in 1982, but controlled burning
of wood waste continued until 1985, when the
site was permanently closed. Investigations
completed in 1990 identified negative impacts
on surface water and ground water from the
landfill sources. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses source control as a final
remedy and management of migration of
ground water as an interim remedy. A
subsequent ROD will address the final
restoration of the surficial aquifer system. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, TCE, toluene, and xylenes;
and metals including arsenic, chromium, and
lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes capping the landfill with a clay/soil
cap and soil cover; installing an active landfill
gas venting system; pumping and treatment of
ground water in the surficial aquifer system
using filtration and either air stripping, carbon
adsorption, ion exchange or chemical treatment,
based on the results of treatability studies;
discharging the treated water onsite to surface
water; restoring or mitigating any wetlands
impacted by this remedial action; conducting
long term surface water and ground water
monitoring; and implementing institutional
controls including deed, land use, and ground
water use restrictions, and site access
restrictions such as fencing. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
ranges from $4,632,000 to $5,016,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost ranging from
$142,730 to $164,130 for 30 years, depending
upon the selected ground water treatment.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Effluent discharge limitations for treated
ground water were calculated from State
discharge statutes, and specify weekly averages
for metal contaminants and monthly averages
for VOCs, as well as maximum concentration
levels. Chemical-specific goals include benzene
8.5 Ibs/day, TCE 22 Ibs/day, toluene (daily
concentration level) 17 rng/1, arsenic
0.045 Ibs/day, chromium (total) 0.034 Ibs/day,
and lead 0.0096 Ibs/day.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed, land use,
and ground water use restrictions will be
implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Interim Remedy; Lead; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Plume
Management; RCRA; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies;
VOCs; Venting; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
146
-------
METAMORA LANDFILL, MI
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 160-acre Metamora Landfill site is an
inactive, privately owned landfill in Metamora
Township, Lapeer County, Michigan. Both
wetland and woodland areas are present onsite.
The site is underlain by a shallow glacial
deposit aquifer, a lower sand and gravel unit
("the intermediate aquifer"), and the Marshall
Sandstone bedrock aquifer. Landfill operations
began in 1955 as an open dump, and the
facility was upgraded in 1969. Industrial and
municipal wastes, including approximately
35,000 drums, were accepted until the landfill
closed in 1980. In 1981, the State sampled
seven drums and identified several hazardous
materials. A 1986 Record of Decision (ROD)
for Operable Unit 1 (OU1) called for the
excavation and disposal of the waste drums
offsite at a RCRA incinerator. This ROD
addresses ground water contamination of the
shallow aquifer, as well as the generation of
leachate at the landfill (OU2). A third ROD
will address onsite contaminated subsurface soil
(OU3). The primary contaminants of concern
in the landfill affecting debris and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, PCE, TCE,
and xylenes; and metals including arsenic and
barium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and treatment of ground
water using precipitation/flocculation to remove
inorganic contaminants, followed by air
stripping and carbon adsorption to remove
organics, and reinjection of treated water into
the shallow aquifer; offsite treatment and
disposal of secondary waste streams including
flocculation sludge and spent carbon; capping
the landfill area using a multi-layer clay cap as
required by the State, and collection and flaring
of landfill gases; monitoring ground water;
implementing institutional controls such as
deed and ground water use restrictions, and
site access restrictions such as fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $19,354,050, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $856,944 for 20 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals for ground
water are based on Michigan Act 307 rules as
well as MCLs and include benzene 1.0 ug/1
(State), PCE 0.7 ug/1 (State), TCE 3.0 ug/1
(State), xylenes 20 ug/1 (State), and for arsenic
the more stringent of 0.02 ug/1 (State) or
background.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and
ground water use restrictions will be
implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic;
Background Levels; Benzene; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Closure Requirements; Debris;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Landfill Closure; Leachability Tests; MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatability
Studies; Venting; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
MOSS-AMERICAN KERR-MCGEE OIL, WI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 88-acre Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil
site, a former wood preserving facility is in
Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. Part of the
facility lies within the 100-year floodplain of
the Little Menomonee River, which flows
through the site. A section of the site is
wooded, and wetlands are located near the
river onsite and downstream. A 23-acre
portion of the site is presently used as a
railroad loading and storage facility for
automobiles, and the remainder of the site is
an undeveloped parkland. An unconfined
shallow aquifer underlies the site. Beginning in
1921, onsite operations consisted of wood
preserving of railroad ties, poles, and fence
posts with a mixture of creosote, which is high
in PAHs, and No. 6 fuel oil. The facility
changed names and ownership several times
until it ceased operations in 1976. Wastes were
discharged to onsite settling ponds until 1971,
when wastewater was discharged into the
sanitary sewer system. In 1971, several people
received chemical burns attributed to creosote
while wading three miles downstream of the
site. This led to a State order requiring
cleanup of onsite settling ponds by the site
owner and operator. In 1973, EPA dredged
5,000 feet of the river directly downstream of
the site. During 1977 to 1978, 450 cubic yards
147
-------
of contaminated soil were removed during the
dismantling of the facility. Studies conducted
before 1980 indicated that extensive creosote
contamination was present in the soil and
ground water onsite as well as in the sediment
of the Little Menomonee River. This Record
of Decision (ROD) provides a final remedy and
addresses source and ground water
remediation. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, toluene,
and xylenes; and other organics including
PAHs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes rerouting 5 miles of the river channel
onsite parallel to the existing channel, followed
by excavating highly contaminated sediment
from the old channel; mitigating wetland areas;
treating 5,200 cubic yards of river sediment and
80,000 cubic yards of contaminated onsite soil
using onsite soil washing and bioslurry
technologies; separation and dewatering of
residues followed by redeposition onsite;
covering treated material with 2 feet of clean
soil and 6 inches of topsoil, followed by
revegetation; recycling or treating slurry water
onsite before discharge to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW) or the river;
constructing a synthetic geomembrane barrier
to prevent movement of contaminated ground
water into the river; collecting ground water
using a drain and interceptor system, followed
by treatment using an oil/water separator and
granular activated carbon, with discharge of
treated water to a POTW or to the river;
removing pure-phase liquid wastes for offsite
incineration; and ground water monitoring.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $26,000,000, which includes
an annual O&M cost of $130,000 for 10 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Goals are designed to reduce the excess lifetime
cancer risk for carcinogens to 10"* or less. For
non-carcinogens, cleanup levels will reduce the
Hazard Index (HI) to 1 or less.
Chemical-specific goals for ground water
include benzene 0,067 ug/1 [State Preventive
Action Level (PAL)], toluene 68.6 ug/1 (State
PAL), and xylenes 124.0 ug/1 (State PAL). The
chemical-specific goal for soil and sediment is
PAHs (carcinogenic) 6.1 mg/kg (State).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
onsite development.
KEYWORDS: ARAR Waiver; Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls; O&M; Offsite
Discharge; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTW); RCRA; Sediment;
Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; Wetlands;
Xylenes.
NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, WI
First Remedial Action
August 1, 1990
The 325-acre National Presto Industries site is
a former munitions and metal-working facility
in Eau Claire, Chippewa County, Wisconsin,
adjacent to the town of Hallie. From 1942 until
1945, the site was government-owned,
contractor-operated, and produced gunpowder
and small arms. From 1945 to 1980, the site
was owned by National Presto Industries (NPI).
Initial operations were for the manufacture of
cookware and consumer products, which
generated waste streams consisting of metals,
oils, grease, and spent solvents. Also,
beginning in 1951, artillery shell fuses, aircraft
parts, and metal projectiles were produced by
NPI under a military contract. Early
waste-handling practices included the use of
dry wells and seepage pits with overflow from
the pits pumped to a series of lagoons, used as
settling and percolation ponds. A major waste
steam generated from the defense-related
activities was a spent forge compound,
comprised of mineral oil, graphite, VOCs, and
asphalt, which accounts for much of the sludge
in the bottom of one of the settling ponds.
From 1966 to 1969, the spent forge compound
was also landfilled onsite. Subsequently, the
spent forge compound was recycled as part of
the manufacturing process. Based on their
investigations, EPA required National Presto
Industries to provide bottled water to an area
in Hallie, where private wells are contaminated
or threatened by contamination from confirmed
onsite sources. This Record of Decision (ROD)
provides for a permanent alternate water
supply to address the principal threat posed by
the ground water contamination at the site.
148
-------
Future operable units will address source
control and ground water remediation. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including PCE and
TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes constructing a well field, storage
facilities and distribution system to supply
water to the businesses and residences within
the affected area of the Hallie Sanitary District;
extending municipal water service from the
City of Eau Claire to businesses and residences
within the affected area that have annexed to
Eau Claire; closing and abandoning all existing
private wells within the affected area that draw
from the contaminated aquifer; and annual
monitoring of the designated private wells
immediately outside the affected area that are
still used as drinking water supply to ensure
continued quality of drinking water. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is between $3,000,000 and $3,200,000,
which includes an estimated annual O&M cost
of between $48,200 and $120,000, depending on
the size and extent of remediation required.
The most likely annual O&M cost is $90,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The primary goal of the EPA and the State is
to provide a permanent and safe alternate
drinking water supply to the affected area.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
O&M; PCE; Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
NAVAL INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
ORDNANCE PLANT, MN
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 82.6-acre Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant (NIROP) site is a weapons
system manufacturing facility in Fridley,
Minnesota, which began operations in 1940.
The site is a government-owned,
contractor-operated plant located just north of
the FMC Corp. Superfund site. NIROP is
located approximately 30 feet above and 700
feet east of the Mississippi River and less than
one mile upstream from the city of Minneapolis
drinking water supply intake. During the
1970s, paint sludge and chlorinated solvents
were disposed of onsite in pits and trenches.
In 1981, State investigations identified TCE in
onsite water supply wells drawing from the
Prairie DuChien/Jordan aquifer, and the wells
were shut down. In 1983, EPA found
drummed waste in the trenches or pits at the
northern portion of the site, and as a result,
during 1983 and 1984, the Navy authorized an
installation restoration program, during which
approximately 1,200 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and 42 drums were excavated
and landfilled offsite. In 1987, TCE use at the
site was discontinued, but the principal threat
posed by the site is the continued migration of
TCE via ground water to the Mississippi River.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
remediation of a shallow ground water
operable unit. The need for a second operable
unit to treat potential contamination sources
will be determined pending the results of
additional investigations. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including PCE, TCE, toluene,
and xylenes.
The selected remedial action for the site is a
two-phased approach. Phase I includes ground
water pumping and pre-treatment, as necessary,
before disposal to a local publicly owned
treatment works (POTW) via an existing
sanitary sewer system; and testing the
recovered water to assist in the design of Phase
II treatment facilities. Phase II includes
treating the recovered ground water by either
a two-stage air stripping process, followed by
vapor-phase granular activated carbon (GAC) to
treat air emissions, or treating ground water
using aqueous-phase GAC, depending on Phase
1 test results; and discharging treated ground
water into the Mississippi River. Both options
include disposal of the treated effluent offsite
and regenerating the spent carbon at an offsite
facility. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $4,100,000 for the
GAC-only option. O&M costs were not
provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water quality in the unconsolidated
aquifer at the site will be restored to MCLs
or State recommended allowable limits, if more
restrictive. Because TCE was found with the
greatest frequency and in the highest
concentrations at the site than any other VOC,
TCE 5.0 ug/1 (MCL) was established as the
149
-------
target cleanup goal for ground water in the
aquifer. Cleanup levels for recovered ground
water discharged to the local POTW must not
exceed 10 mg/1, total VOCs, and individual
VOC levels must be less than 3 mg/1 (local
POTW standards). Contaminants in any
uncaptured portion of the aquifer are expected
to dissipate by natural means over time.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Clean Air Act; Clean Water
Act; Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
MCLs; Offsite Discharge; PCE; Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Xylenes.
NL INDUSTRIES/TARACORP
LEAD SMELTING, IL
First Remedial Action
March 30, 1990
The NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelting site
is an inactive secondary lead smelting facility
in a heavily industrialized section of Granite
City, Madison County, Illinois. Land in the
site vicinity is primarily industrial, but includes
adjacent residential communities, including
Eagle Park Acres and Venice Township. Prior
to 1903, the site was used for metal refining,
fabricating, and other associated activities.
From 1903 to 1983, the site was used for
secondary lead smelting activities. These
operations generated an onsite pile of blast
furnace slag and battery casing debris waste
(the Taracorp pile). From 1981 to 1983, St.
Louis Lead Recyclers, Inc. (SLLR) used
equipment on an adjacent property to recycle
lead-bearing materials from the Taracorp waste
pile for use in the furnaces at Taracorp. Hard
rubber was the end waste product of this
recycling process. In 1983, both operations
were discontinued and the equipment
dismantled. In 1983, a State study of the
Granite City lead attainment air emissions
problem linked emissions from the onsite lead
smelter and reclamation operations at the NL
Industries/Taracorp site to the air pollution
problem. Onsite contaminated areas identified
during the study included the 85,000 cubic yard
Taracorp pile, smaller adjacent waste piles
associated with the SLLR recycling operation
that total 2,450 cubic yards, and 25 to 35 drums
containing solid waste from onsite smelting
operations. Additionally, the adjacent property
contained a 4,000 cubic yard pile of battery
casing debris from the SLLR operation, and
another large contaminated unpaved area was
identified south and west of the site. Other
contamination associated with the site
included 2,700 cubic yards of battery casing
material in Eagle Park Acres and an additional
670 cubic yards of similar material in Venice
Township. In 1984, the State required the
implementation of remedial actions to improve
air quality. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses the Taracorp pile, the SLLR piles,
and residential soil, alleys, and driveways that
are contaminated by airborne lead and/or hard
rubber battery casing material. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil and
debris is lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating a total of 94,820 cubic
yards of lead-contaminated soil and debris from
the SLLR piles, the unpaved area, and adjacent
residential areas, and hard rubber battery
casing material from Venice, Eagle Park Acres,
and other nearby communities; consolidating
the soil and debris within the Taracorp pile;
covering the Taracorp pile with a RCRA
multi-media cap, and lining the
newly-expanded Taracorp pile with a clay liner;
removing all onsite drums to an offsite
secondary lead smelter facility for recovery;
monitoring nearby communities to determine if
additional areas need remediation or lead
exposures need mitigation; performing blood
lead sampling to determine potential acute
site-associated health effects; monitoring air and
ground water during remedial activities;
developing a contingency plan to provide
remedial action if any nearby soil lead levels
exceed 500 mg/kg or ground water or air
exceed applicable standards; and implementing
institutional controls, including deed
restrictions, and site access restrictions such as
fencing. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $30,000,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $35,300 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels for lead are based on the
"Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites" (1989). All
contaminated soil in the unpaved area adjacent
to the site will be excavated to achieve a lead
150
-------
cleanup level of 1,000 mg/kg. All
contaminated soil in adjacent residential areas
will be excavated to achieve a cleanup level of
lead 500 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site to
prevent disturbance of the capped Taracorp
pile.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Closure
Requirements; Contingency Remedy; Debris;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure; Lead; Metals; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; RCRA; Soil; State Guidance; State
Standards/ Regulations.
OCONOMOWOC ELECTROPLATING, WI
First Remedial Action
September 20, 1990
The 10.5-acre Oconomowoc Electroplating site
encompasses a 5-acre active electroplating
facility and 5 acres of adjacent wetlands in
Dodge County, Ashippun, Wisconsin. The
Oconomowoc Electroplating Company's (OEC)
facility includes a main building that houses
process lines, a wastewater treatment building,
two formerly used wastewater treatment
lagoons, and various storage tank and container
deposit areas. Recreational facilities, residences,
and businesses that use ground water for their
drinking water supply, are in proximity to the
OEC facility. In addition, Davy Creek, a small
creek and warm water sport fishery, flows
through the wetlands 500 feet south of the site.
Electroplating, finishing, and degreasing
processes performed since 1957 at the OEC
facility produce a multi-source effluent stream
contaminated with heavy metals and VOCs.
The effluent, as well as accidental spills and
leaks around the property, have resulted in
widespread site contamination. Prior to 1972,
untreated wastewaters were discharged directly
into the Davy Creek wetlands, and even after
the construction of two treatment lagoons,
untreated wastes and sludge overflowed the
lagoons and continued to accumulate in the
wetlands. Lagoon sludge removal was initiated
by OEC in 1979 but was never completed, and
therefore, discharge of contaminants, including
RCRA-listed hazardous waste (F006), continued
into the wetlands. An estimated 10,000 square
yards of wetlands are contaminated with metals
and cyanide. Hazardous waste was also found
in between the walls and floor of the
wastewater treatment building (where it was
placed as a sealant), leaking from waste
containers, and spilled in a north parking lot
area. Due to its complexity, the site has been
divided into four Operable Units (OU) for
remediation: the surface water, sludge and
contaminated soil associated with the two
lagoons (OU1); all other contaminated soil
around the OEC facility not associated with the
lagoons or found beneath the manufacturing
building, including a fill area, a lowlands area,
the drainage ditches and the parking lot area
(OU2); the associated contaminated ground
water (OU3); and the highly contaminated
sediment in the Davy Creek wetlands area
(OU4). All remedial actions for the operable
units are final except for OU4, which is an
interim action. Further wetland investigation
will delineate the final removal area. In
addition, if after further investigation, the
building foundation and underlying soil will
need remediating, an appropriate remedial
action will be developed to accompany the
wetland remedial action. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, debris, sludge, ground water and
surface water are VOCs including TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; and metals including chromium
and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes clean closing the lagoon by excavating
650 cubic yards of lagoon sludge and
surrounding soil, followed by stabilization and
offsite disposal of the material and pumping
72,000 gallons of contaminated lagoon water
(which will be hauled offsite and treated)
(OU1); excavating 700 cubic yards of soil and
debris with offsite treatment and disposal
(OU2); onsite ground water pumping and
treatment using filtration, ion exchange, air
stripping, and carbon adsorption, followed by
onsite discharge to surface water (a treatability
study will be conducted to determine the
effectiveness of the ion exchange and to
determine the disposition of the resin) (OU3);
excavating 6.000 cubic yards of contaminated
sediment from Davy Creek and adjacent
wetlands to a depth of two feet, followed by
offsite stabilization, treatment, and disposal of
the contaminated sediment and monitoring of
the area; and performing additional bioassay
and risk assessment work to determine final
exposure levels (OU4). The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $7,576,196,
151
-------
which includes an annual O&M cost of $90369.
The present worth costs associated with each of
the four OUs are $490,302 (OU1); $258,667
(OU2); $1,831,805 (OU3), which includes an
annual O&M cost of $90,569; and $4,995,422
(OU4).
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The lagoon soil excavation levels for the OEC
site OU1 will attain background levels
consistent with State and Federal (RCRA) clean
closure levels; excavation of OU2 soil will
attain a 10"6 cumulative carcinogenic risk and a
cumulative HI<1 for noncarcinogens. Ground
water treatment (OU3) will attain Federal and
State ground water cleanup standards and are
based on State preventative action limits
(PALs). Chemical-specific ground water goals
include chromium 5.0 ug/1 (PAL); and TCE
0.18 (PAL). Cleanup levels for Davy Creek and
adjacent wetlands have not been determined.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Closure; Clean Water Act;
Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contamination; Excavation; Filling; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Hybrid/Alternate Closure;
Interim Remedy; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; Plume Management;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment;
Sludge; Soil; Solvents; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria; Wetlands; Xylenes.
ONALASKA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, WI
First Remedial Action - Final
August 14, 1990
The 11-acre Onalaska Municipal Landfill site
includes a 7-acre landfill owned by the
Township of Onalaska, which is located in
central-western Wisconsin. The Black River
and its associated wetlands are 400 feet west of
the site and lie within a wildlife and fish
refuge. The site was operated as a sand and
gravel quarry until the late 1960s, when it was
converted and used as a municipal landfill
until 1980. Although the site was primarily
used for the disposal of municipal wastes,
solvent wastes were also disposed of onsite
until 1976. Approximately 320,000 gallons of
liquid solvent waste and approximately 1,000
drums of solvent waste were either burned
with other trash onsite or poured directly into
holes for burial in the southwestern portion of
the landfill. The Township capped the landfill
in 1982, but subsequent onsite investigations
revealed ground water contamination within
and around the site. Ground water flows
beneath the landfill, where it comes into contact
with solvents leaking from the solvent disposal
area. The ground water flows in a
southwesterly direction and a ground water
contaminant plume has migrated from the
southwestern edge of the landfill and appears
to be discharging into the wetlands. This
Record of Decision addresses two operable
units, the ground water plume and the
contaminated soil adjacent to the southwestern
portion of the landfill, which is a major source
of ground water contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other organics
including PAHs; and metals including arsenic
and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes in-situ bioremediation of the
solvent-contaminated soil and, if feasible, a
portion of the landfill debris; pumping and
treatment of the ground water plume using
aeration, clarification, and filtration, followed by
discharge of the treated ground water into the
Black River and onsite disposal of the sludge
generated during the treatment process;
reconstruction of the landfill cap and
installation of a passive methane gas venting
system to control the gas buildup under the
cap; ground water monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls
including deed restrictions limiting ground
water and surface water use. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$8,000,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $164,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS;
Chemical-specific soil cleanup standards were
not provided but will be established once the
reduction rate for bioremediation has been
determined during the pilot-scale test.
Currently, the estimated cleanup goal is an
80-95% reduction of the organic contaminant
mass in the soil. Ground water at the landfill
waste boundary will meet SDWA MCLs or
152
-------
non-zero MCLGs. Chemical-specific cleanup
standards for the ground water beyond the site
boundary are based on State cleanup levels and
include benzene 0.067 ug/1, toluene 68.6 ug/1,
xylenes 124 ug/1 TCE 0.18 ug/1, arsenic
5 ug/1, and lead 5 ug/1. The reconstructed
cap is projected to reduce the rate of
precipitation infiltration by 80%, thereby
minimizing contaminant migration toward the
ground water.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions limiting surface and ground water
use at the site will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Arsenic; Benzene;
Biodegradation; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
MCLGs; Metal; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
Venting; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
OTT/STORY/CORDOVA CHEMICAL, MI
Second Remedial Action
September 29, 1990
The Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical site is a
former specialty chemical manufacturing facility
in Dalton Township, Muskegon County,
Michigan. The site is at the headwaters of a
small, unnamed tributary of Little Bear Creek,
which flows southeast of the site approximately
one-half mile away to Muskegon River, three
miles to the south. The site operated from
1957 to 1985 under a series of owners.
Chemical products manufactured onsite
included intermediate items used in
manufacturing pharmaceuticals, dyestuffs,
agricultural chemicals, diisocyanates, and
herbicides. For at least ten years, production
vessel clean-out wastes and wastewaters were
discharged to onsite unlined lagoons and
allowed to dissipate into soil. In subsequent
years, wastes were also drummed and stored
onsite. In the early 1960s, the State noted signs
of water and soil contamination. Site owners
attempted to manage the ground water
contaminant plumes emanating from the site,
but the effectiveness of these measures was
uncertain. In 1977, the State negotiated with a
new site owner to remove several thousand
drums, thousands of cubic yards of lagoon
sludge, and to destroy or to neutralize
phosgene gas left onsite. In 1982, an alternate
water supply was undertaken and financed in
part by the State and a former owner. A
Record of Decision (ROD), signed in 1989 and
reaffirmed in 1990 after additional public
comment, addressed Operable Unit 1 (OU1),
the contamination of the nearby Little Bear
Creek system. This ROD addresses aquifer
restoration. A subsequent ROD will address
remaining threats posed by the contaminated
soil areas at the site. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including benzene, 1,2
dichloroethane, PCE, TCE, toluene, vinyl
chloride, and xylenes; other organics including
pesticides; and metals including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes installing and operating extraction
wells in a phased approach to restore the
aquifer and prevent degradation of useable
ground water downgradient of the plume;
pumping and treatment of ground water in the
shallow and deeper zones of the aquifer system
using physical-chemical treatment including
UV-oxidation, air stripping, biological treatment
such as activated sludge, and/or
filtration/adsorption such as granular activated
carbon as determined in the design phase;
discharging the treated effluent in the nearby
stream; installing a ground water monitoring
system to demonstrate the effectiveness of
restoration; and implementing institutional
controls, such as deed restrictions to limit
ground water use. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is
$26,000,000, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $1,400,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup goals include benzene
1 ug/1 (10"6 cancer risk level), toluene 40 ug/1
(State standard), TCE 3 ug/1 (10* cancer risk
level), and xylenes 20 ug/1 (State standard).
Effluents must meet limitations for stream
discharge as administered by the State.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions or other controls will be
implemented to limit current and future uses of
ground water at and downgradient of the
facility.
153
-------
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Discharge; Organics; PCE;
Pesticides; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
PRISTINE, OH
First Remedial Action (Amendment) - Final
March 30, 1990
The 2-acre Pristine site is in Reading, Hamilton
County, Ohio. The site is bordered by
industrial and residential areas, including a
trailer park three hundred feet northeast of the
site. Eight municipal supply wells serving the
citizens of Reading are located approximately
300 feet northwest of the site. Prior to 1974,
this site was used for the manufacture of
sulfuric acid. Subsequently, Pristine began
liquid waste disposal operations at the site, and
in 1977, obtained a permit to operate an onsite
liquid waste incinerator. An onsite concrete
lined pit (the magic pit) was used to store and
treat hazardous materials during liquid waste
disposal operations. In 1979, State
investigations identified as many as 8,000 to
10,000 drums and several thousand gallons of
liquid wastes onsite. Types of waste included
acids, solvents, pesticides, and PCBs. Over 90
hazardous compounds were detected onsite in
the soil, ground water, surface water, sediment,
and debris as a result of past disposal
activities. In 1981, the State ordered all onsite
disposal operations to cease. From 1980 to
1983, EPA and Pristine removed onsite wastes
including paint and solvent sludge, solvents,
pesticides, organics, PCB-contaminated soil, and
incinerator ash. During 1984, the PRPs
removed contaminated soil and waste as a
means to address the immediate site hazards.
A 1987 Record of Decision (ROD) documents
the selection of in-situ vitrification of the upper
12 feet of soil across the site. This ROD
amends the soil component remedy of the 1987
ROD from in-situ vitrification to incineration
and soil vapor extraction. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, PCE, TCE, and xylenes;
other organics including dioxin and pesticides
such as DDT; metals including lead, chromium,
and arsenic; and other inorganics.
The selected amended remedial action for this
site includes excavating and incinerating the
top one foot of contaminated soil from across
the site (a total of 3,598 cubic yards) and 1,799
cubic yards of contaminated soil to a depth of
four feet in areas that contain semi-volatile
organic compounds and pesticides in excess of
performance goals; incinerating 600 cubic yards
of contaminated sediment and 1,125 cubic yards
of contaminated soil surrounding the magic pit;
testing the residual ash and placing the ash
onsite if it meets standards for delisting;
performing in-situ soil vapor extraction with an
off-gas control system to extract VOCs from
onsite soil to a depth of 12 feet; dewatering the
upper aquifer, and onsite treatment of the
extracted ground water using carbon
adsorption; capping the soil with a RCRA
multi-layer cap; pumping and treatment of
ground water from the lower and upper
aquifer and lower outwash lens of the upper
aquifer using air stripping and carbon
adsorption; decontaminating and demolishing
all onsite structures and disposing of the debris
offsite; monitoring ground water; and
implementing institutional controls including
deed restrictions, and site access restrictions
such as fencing. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $13,500,000,
which includes an O&M cost of $6,000,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific goals for soil/sediment were
based on a cumulative 10"6 incremental lifetime
cancer risk of eleven indicator compounds
including aldrin 15 ug/kg, benzene 116 ug/kg,
chloroform 2,043 mg/kg, DDT 487 ug/kg,
1,2-DCA 19 ug/kg, 1,1-DCE 285 ug/kg,
dieldrin 6 ug/kg, PAHs 14 ug/kg, dioxin
0 ug/kg, PCE 3,244 ug/kg, and TCE
175 ug/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Decontamination; Dioxin;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Inorganics;
154
-------
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCE; Pesticides; RCRA;
ROD Amendment; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Xylenes.
REILLY TAR & CHEMICAL
(ST. LOUIS PARK), MN
Third Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 80-acre Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis
Park) site is a former coal tar distillation and
wood preserving plant in St. Louis Park,
Minnesota. The site overlies a complex system
of aquifers, including the St. Peter aquifer that
provide drinking water to area residences. The
St. Peter Aquifer contains one municipal well,
which is used during periods of peak demand,
however, the majority of the drinking water in
St. Louis Park is obtained from deeper aquifers.
Surrounding land use is primarily residential.
From 1917 to 1972, wastewater containing
creosote and coal tar was discharged to onsite
surface water, and as a result, small wastewater
spills occured into onsite soil. In 1972, the site
was purchased by the city in response to
complaints about wastewater contamination,
and the plant was dismantled. State
investigations from 1978 to 1981 identified
site-related ground water contamination. Two
previous Records of Decision (RODs) in 1984
and 1986 addressed remediation of specific
aquifers, the filling of a small onsite wetland,
and offsite soil contamination. This ROD
addresses Operable Unit 4 (OU4), remediation
of the St. Peter aquifer. A subsequent ROD
will address any remaining site problems as
OU3. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are organics
including PAHs and phenols.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping an existing well screened
within the St. Peter aquifer and initially
discharging the extracted water offsite to a
publicly owned treatment works (POTW); and
ground water monitoring. Within 3 to 5 years,
direct onsite discharge to surface water will be
conducted if NPDES permit requirements can
be met. If requirements are not met, onsite
treatment, possibly using granular activated
carbon, will be conducted prior to onsite
discharge. The estimated capital cost for this
remedial action is $225,000 to $250,000,
depending on the need for onsite treatment.
Annual O&M costs are estimated at $60,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Extracted ground water must meet NPDES
discharge requirements for both discharge to a
POTW and to surface water. Chemical-specific
levels include carcinogenic PAHs 70 ug/1, other
PAHs 17 ug/1, and phenols 10 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; Phenols; Plume Management;
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW);
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Wetlands.
SANGAMO/CRAB ORCHARD NWR
(USDOI), IL
Second Remedial Action
August 1, 1990
The Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI)
site, in the Crab Orchard National Wildlife
Refuge, is near Carterville, Illinois. Within the
refuge, lakes and adjacent wetlands support
recreational activities on the western portion of
the refuge, while the eastern portion is used for
manufacturing purposes. The Department of
Defense (DOD), the original administrator of
the refuge, leased portions of the refuge to
munitions and explosives manufacturers who
continue to operate onsite. In 1947, DOD
transferred the administration of the refuge to
the Department of the Interior (DOI). DOI also
leased portions of the refuge to manufacturers
of PCB transformers and capacitors, automobile
parts, fiberglass boats, plated metal parts, and
jet engine starters. Solid wastes generated from
these industrial activities were disposed of in
onsite landfills while other liquid wastes may
have been discharged into nearby surface
waters and impoundments. EPA has divided
the site into four operable units. The first
operable unit, documented in a March 1990
Record of Decision (ROD), addressed the
metal-contaminated areas. The second operable
unit is documented in this ROD and focuses on
the PCB-contaminated soil and sediment in four
155
-------
sites including the Job Corps Landfill (site 17),
an inactive 1-acre landfill containing 1,400 cubic
yards of contaminated material; the Water
Tower Landfill (site 28), an inactive 1-acre
landfill containing 100 cubic yards of
contaminated material; the Area 9 Landfill (site
32), an inactive 2.5-acre landfill; and the Area
9 Building Complex (site 33), where
contaminated runoff from an industrial building
complex discharges into two drainage ditches.
The Area 9 Landfill and Building Complex
together contain 36,000 cubic yards of
contaminated material. Two additional
operable units will be addressed in a future
ROD. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting soil and sediment are organics
including PCBs and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation and treatment of
PCB-contaminated soil and sediment using
incineration or in-situ vitrification (ISV), if
appropriate, and stabilization/fixation of
incineration residues and non-incinerated,
metal-contaminated soil and sediment, followed
by onsite disposal in a RCRA-permitted landfill;
backfilling, capping, and closure of excavated
areas and areas where contamination is below
the excavation criteria; environmental
monitoring including ground water, surface
water, and leachate monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls
including land use and transfer restrictions.
ISV, an innovative treatment technology, will
substitute for incineration if a successful
demonstration of the technology is made. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $25,000,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $379,701 for 30 years. If ISV is
used, the estimated present worth cost of this
remedial action will be $17,080,215, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $201,800.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil and sediment contaminated above the
established remediation goals will be excavated
and treated. Soil remediation goals include
PCBs 1 mg/kg for the top 12 inches of
surficial soil, PCBs 25 mg/kg for soil below 12
inches, and lead 450 mg/kg. Sediment
remediation goals include PCBs 0.5 mg/kg.
Soil and sediment remediation goals are based
on the risk assessment, a 10* excess cancer risk
level, and an HI=1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land use and
transfer restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Closure;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; RCRA; Sediment;
Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; Toxic Substances Control Act-
Treatment Technology; Vitrification.
SPIEGELBERG LANDFILL, MI
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1990
The 115-acre Spiegelberg Landfill site is an
active sand, peat, and gravel mining site in
Green Oak Township, Livingston County,
Michigan. Surrounding the site are several
residences and small businesses which rely on
onsite non-municipal water sources for their
drinking water supply. In addition, the
Rasmussen Superfund site neighbors the site to
the east. From 1966 to 1977, a 2.5-acre portion
of the site was used to dispose of septic,
domestic, and industrial wastes, including paint
sludge. Site investigations revealed two areas
of concern, a paint sludge disposal area,
Operable Unit I (OU I) and a ground water
plume (OU II), contaminated as a result of the
paint sludge disposal area. The paint sludge
disposal area was addressed in a 1986 Record
of Decision (ROD), and all wastes associated
with the paint sludge disposal area were
removed, including the paint sludge and debris,
the contaminated soil underlying the paint
waste, liquid paint, laboratory liquid waste, and
gas cylinders. This second ROD focuses on the
resulting ground water plume, which is
estimated to contain 3,770,000 cubic feet of
contaminated ground water. Although the
contaminated ground water plume has not yet
migrated beyond the site boundary, continued
migration of the plume poses a threat to water
supply wells north and northwest of the site.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes; and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes ground water pumping and treatment
using chemical precipitation and pH adjustment
to remove inorganics, biological treatment to
remove organics, and air stripping and granular
156
-------
activated carbon to remove residual organic
contamination, followed by onsite discharge of
treated water to the ground water;
implementing institutional controls including
deed restrictions; and ground and well water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for the remedial action is $4,420,000 which
includes a present worth O&M cost of
$2,000,000 over at least 5 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals
include benzene 1.2 ug/1 (based on a 10*
cancer risk level), toluene 40 ug/1 (based on
taste and odor thresholds), and lead 5.0 ug/1
(based on human lifecycle safe concentrations).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions and other institutional controls, as
necessary, will be implemented to ensure the
integrity of the remedial action.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Absorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standards/Regulations; Toluene; VOCs;
Xylenes.
SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP DUMP, MI
First Remedial Action - Final •
September 29, 1990
The 16-acre Springfield Township Dump site is
in Davisburg, Springfield Township, Michigan.
The site is comprised of an open field area
surrounded by dense woods. Surrounding
land use is mixed agricultural and residential.
The site overlies both a shallow and deep
aquifer, and there are several wetlands adjacent
to the site. A 4-acre portion of the site was
used for industrial waste disposal between 1966
and 1968. Unknown quantities of industrial
waste were drained into onsite excavated pits
in a central disposal area or deposited on low
ground areas. Random dumping of refuse
occurred onsite, and many drums containing
liquid wastes were seen scattered throughout
the woods. In 1978, the State identified PCBs,
paint sludge, solvents, oils, and greases in 1,500
onsite drums. State studies also determined
that a portion of the aquifer underlying the site
was highly susceptible to contamination, due to
the absence of a clay layer. In 1979 and 1980,
VOC-contaminated well water was found at
private residences near the site. In 1979, the
State ordered the 1,500 onsite drums removed
and disposed of off site. From 1979 to 1980, 711
tons of contaminated soil were excavated and
removed from several onsite areas including
the centrally located disposal pits. Because of
limited funding, some wastes remained onsite,
but the pits were subsequently filled in and
regraded. In 1980, the State identified onsite
PCB- and DDT-contaminated soil and onsite
VOC-contamination in ground water. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
remediation of onsite contaminated soil and
ground water and will be a final remedy for
the site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are VOCs
including TCE and toluene; other organics
including PCBs; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating and treating onsite a total
of 11,820 cubic yards of VOC- and other
organic-contaminated soil by incineration, and
solidifying the resulting ash; treating
metal-contaminated soil using solidification and
redepositing the treated soil and ash onsite or
temporarily storing the treated soil onsite in a
solid waste unit; treating remaining soil using
in-situ vacuum extraction and performing a
treatability study to determine its effectiveness;
ground water pumping and treatment using
carbon adsorption, followed by onsite
reinjection of the treated ground water; and
implementing site access restrictions, such as
fencing. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $9,271,290, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $97,659.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil remediation goals are based on a 10*
cancer risk and State Michigan Act 307
Standards. Chemical-specific soil cleanup levels
include PCBs 1 mg/kg, toluene 0.08 mg/kg,
and TCE 0.08 mg/kg. Ground water will be
remediated to meet or exceed SDWA Federal
MCLs or MCLGs including toluene 0.4 mg/1
(MCL) and TCE 0.003 mg/1 (MCL). Lead and
arsenic will be remediated to background levels
for both soil and ground water.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
157
-------
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Background Levels;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Lead; MCLGs; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Temporary Storage;
TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs.
ST. LOUIS RIVER, MN
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 230-acre St. Louis River site (also known as
the St. Louis River/Interlake Duluth Tar site) is
on the north bank of the St. Louis River in
Duluth, Minnesota, with portions of the site
within the 100-year floodplain. The bank of
the river consists of a series of inlets and
peninsulas, including the Stryker Embayment
and the boat slip inlets. This site is the former
location of several pig iron and coking plants,
as well as separate tar and chemical companies,
which used byproducts from the plants. The
chemical companies closed in the 1940s, and
the pig iron coking plants closed during the
1960s. Tar seeps are present onsite in several
locations, including the embayment and boat
slip areas where tar producers had disposed of
tars directly onto the ground. Soil and
underlying ground water are contaminated with
high levels of PAHs as a result of past onsite
disposal activities. Chemicals released from the
sediment are the source of a thick layer of
tar-like material in portions of the embayment
and boat slip areas. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses Operable Unit 1 (OU1), the
remediation of the onsite tar seeps, which are
a potential source of ground water and surface
water contamination. A future ROD will
include a treatability study to address the
contamination of the soil, sediment, ground
water, and surface water at the site (OU2).
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil are organics including PAHs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 300-2300 cubic yards of
visible tar seeps with offsite disposal to a
power plant or a similar facility for use as
recyclable fuel, and landfilling the tar and ash
residues offsite. This ROD provides a
contingency for incineration of up to 10% of
the materials at a RCRA incinerator if the
power plant will not accept the contaminated
soil/tar mixture. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action ranges from
$700,000 to $2,700,000, depending on the extent
of excavation required. There are no O&M
costs associated with this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No chemical-specific goals are provided;
however, this remedial action will reduce the
current excess lifetime cancer risk for ground
water to acceptable levels and prevent
migration of contaminants to surface and
ground water.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Air Act; Clean Water Act; Contingent Remedy;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Floodplain;
Incineration; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; RCRA; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations.
TRI-STATE PLATING, IN
First Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1990
The 3,900-square foot Tri-State Plating site is an
abandoned metal plating facility in Columbus,
Bartholomew County, Indiana. Land use in the
vicinity of the site is residential and industrial.
Metal plating operations at the site began
during the 1940s. Tri-State Plating operated the
facility from 1981 until 1984, when operations
were shut down and the site abandoned. Site
features include an electroplating building and
an onsite storage building. In 1983, the State
identified soil contaminated with chromium,
lead, and other metals, which was thought to
be a result of an onsite waste spill. Tri-State
Plating excavated the contaminated soil and
placed it in onsite drums. Subsequently, the
State identified additional onsite contaminated
soil and elevated levels of chromium in offsite
ground water, and determined that facility
wastes had been discharged directly into the
sewer line. In 1984, following additional onsite
waste disposal violations, onsite spills, and the
failure of Tri-State Plating to install an onsite
waste treatment system, the State blocked
sewers from the site and cut off the water
supply. From 1987 to 1989, in two separate
actions, EPA removed 27 drums of inorganic
material from the storage building, excavated
158
-------
contaminated onsite soil, decontaminated and
demolished all onsite structures, filled and
revegetated the excavated areas, and disposed
of the soil and debris in offsite landfills.
Subsequent site investigations revealed that
ground water beneath and migrating from the
site was contaminated with metals and required
remediation. Previous removal actions
successfully reduced metal concentration in
onsite soil to background levels; therefore,
onsite soil does not warrant remedial action.
This ROD addresses the contaminated onsite
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are metals
including chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping contaminated ground water
from the underlying aquifer and discharging
the water to a publicly owned treatment works
(POTW); monitoring ground water and surface
water; conducting a public education program;
and implementing institutional controls and site
access restrictions including fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action ranges from $1,110,000 to $1,115,000 for
2-10 years, depending on the ground water
pumping rate. O&M costs were not provided
for this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Pumping of ground water will continue until
contaminant levels meet State and Federal
standards including chromium 50 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
usage will be restricted until remediation has
been completed.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
MCLs; MCLGs; Metals; Offsite Discharge;
Offsite Treatment; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring.
UNION SCRAP IRON METAL, MN
First Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1990
The Union Scrap Iron Metal site is a vacant
industrial property in Minneapolis, Hennepin
County, Minnesota. The site overlies an
alluvial aquifer. Surrounding land use is
primarily industrial and commercial, with
adjacent residential areas. From the early 1970s
until 1983, the site was used as a processing
facility for used batteries and scrap metal.
Batteries were crushed and recyclable materials
were sorted onsite. Several piles of crushed
battery casings and electrical equipment were
present onsite at various times. Intermittent
investigations conducted from 1980 to 1987
identified contaminated soil onsite as a result of
these processing activities. In 1987, a
potentially responsible party removed 773 tons
of battery casing material from the site. Two
subsequent EPA removal actions in 1988
included the excavation and offsite disposal of
onsite contaminated soil, an underground
storage tank, debris, a concrete pad, and an
onsite building. A 1989 to 1990 remedial
investigation determined that prior removal
actions were effective in eliminating
contaminated onsite soil and waste, and the
low level ground water contamination does not
pose any threat to public health. Therefore,
there are no contaminants of concern affecting
this site.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action. Previous site removal activities
have reduced onsite contaminant levels to
below background or EPA health-based levels.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MN
First Remedial Action - Final
June 11, 1990
The University of Minnesota site, composed of
four subsites, is in Rosemount, Dakota County,
Minnesota, approximately 20 miles southeast of
the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area.
Surrounding land use is agricultural and rural
residential. The site is underlain by a shallow
159
-------
sand and gravel aquifer and a deeper fractured
dolomite and sandstone aquifer, both
hydraulically connected and current sources of
drinking water. Three of the subsites were
occupied by tenants between approximately
1968 and 1985. All three subsites were
involved with the storage and/or
reconditioning of electrical equipment and
contain PCB-contaminated soil and debris from
spills or disposal of PCB oil. One subsite was
also involved with reclamation of copper wire.
The fourth subsite was used by the University
as a burn pit for waste chemicals. From 1968
to 1974, it is estimated that 90,000 gallons of
laboratory chemicals, solvents, corrosives, salts,
heavy metals, organics, and inorganics were
disposed of in the burn pit, which was
ultimately capped in 1980. In 1984, ground
water sampling identified the burn pit as a
source of contamination. In 1986, the
University submitted plans for an alternate
water supply for affected residents. This action
has been updated and is addressed in this
Record of Decision (ROD). This ROD also
addresses ground water treatment in the burn
pit area and treatment and consolidation of
contaminated soil and debris in the remaining
three subsites. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, debris, and ground
water are VOCs including chloroform; other
organics including PCBs; and metals such as
lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 2,620 cubic yards of soil
containing greater than 1,000 mg/kg of lead
and transporting the soil to an offsite RCRA
landfill for disposal; excavating 160 cubic yards
of concrete debris and 6,309 cubic yards of soil
with greater than 25 mg/kg of PCBs, followed
by onsite thermal desorption and fume
incineration; consolidating 14,809 cubic yards of
soil with 10-25 mg/kg of PCBs and limiting
access with man-made barriers; backfilling
excavations with treated soil and grading and
revegetating the area; pumping and treating
contaminated ground water using a packed
tower air stripper, followed by onsite discharge
to an infiltration supply pond; and ground
water monitoring. Outside of the selected
remedy, the University of Minnesota is
constructing two supply wells upgradient of
the contaminant plume and supplying 27
affected residents with this alternate water
supply. The combined estimated capital cost
for both remedies is $8,308,686. There are no
O&M costs associated with the soil remedy.
The estimated annual O&M cost for the ground
water remedy is $8,695 for 20 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels for carcinogenic compounds are
meant to reduce the excess lifetime cancer risk
to 104 to 10"7. Specific soil cleanup goals
include PCBs 25 mg/kg (TSCA PCB "Spill
Cleanup Policy") and lead 1,000 mg/kg (EP
Toxicity Leach Testing). Specific ground water
cleanup goals for VOCs were also provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Debris; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Leachability
Tests; Lead; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
WAYNE WASTE OIL, IN
First Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1990
The 30-acre Wayne Waste Oil site is a former
oil reclamation operation and municipal landfill
in Columbia City, Indiana. The site lies within
the Blue River floodplain, and a wetlands area
is located onsite. The site overlies a
contaminated unconsolidated surficial aquifer.
From 1953 to 1970, part of the site was
operated as a municipal landfill. From 1975 to
1982, waste oil reclamation activities, which
included the storage and handling of hazardous
wastes were conducted onsite. Site features
include an incinerator, onsite disposal pits,
buried drums, vacant office buildings, and
several above-ground and underground storage
tanks, which contain hazardous material. From
1979 to 1980, an estimated 250,000 gallons of
hazardous waste were illegally dumped onsite
and allowed to percolate into the soil. In
addition the current landfill cap is not adequate
to prevent exposure of buried landfill material.
Removal actions by potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) in 1986 and 1988 resulted in
remediation of several onsite disposal pits, and
the removal and offsite disposal of 340 buried
drums, the contents of 23 storage tanks, over
160
-------
12,900 tons of contaminated soil from the onsite
pits, and implementation of site access
restrictions. Site investigations by the PRP
under a Consent Order from 1988 to 1989,
characterized the location and extent of
remaining contaminated media, and quantified
the chemical contaminants at the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene, and
xylenes; other organics including PAHs and
phenols; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes treating VOC-contaminated soil using
vapor extraction; treating metals-contaminated
soil using soil washing or
solidification/stabilization; delineating the area
of the municipal landfill; capping the landfill
and constructing a landfill venting system if
necessary; covering PAH-contaminated soil or
consolidating the soil under the landfill cap;
treating and disposing of the contents of
storage tanks offsite, steam cleaning, and
removing the storage tanks offsite; dismantling
the incinerator and disposing of the debris
offsite or within the onsite municipal landfill;
pumping and treatment of ground water onsite
using air stripping, or discharging the ground
water offsite to a publicly owned treatment
works (POTW); monitoring air, ground water,
and surface water; and implementing
institutional controls including deed, land use,
and ground water use restrictions, and site
access restrictions such as fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $5,582,499, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $291,000 for 15 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels for soil will be calculated using
a contaminant leaching model.
Chemical-specific cleanup levels for ground
water are based on Federal MCLs and non-zero
MCLGs including benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), PCE
5 ug/1 (MCL), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), toluene
2,000 ug/1 (MCL), xylenes 10,000 ug/1
(proposed MCL), and arsenic 50 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed, ground
water, and land use restrictions will be
implemented onsite.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic; Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure; Leachability Tests; Lead; MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE;
Pesticides; Phenols; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil Washing/Flushing; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; Venting; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
WHEELER PIT, WI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 3.4-acre Wheeler Pit site is a former
industrial waste disposal pit in LaPrairie
Township, approximately 1-1/2 miles from
Janesville, Wisconsin. The soil beneath the site
is generally sand and gravel, and the
uppermost aquifer, also composed of sand and
gravel, serves as a major source of drinking
water for the Janesville area. From 1900 to the
1970s, the site was used as a sand and gravel
pit by a railroad company, which may also
have used the pit for refuse disposal. In 1956,
General Motors Corporation (CMC) leased 3.82
acres of the pit, and from 1956 to 1960,
disposed of general refuse onsite. From 1960
to 1974, CMC disposed of an estimated 22.3
million gallons of industrial wastes, including
paint spray booth sludge, residue from part
hanger stripping systems, clarifier sludge, and
powerhouse coal ash. In 1974, the State
required closure of the disposal area along with
ground water monitoring. Onsite elevated
levels of several contaminants, including TCE
and chromium, were detected in the ground
water after the site was closed. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses control of the source
area, as well as monitoring of ground water.
Natural attenuation will be relied upon to
remediate the ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the waste,
soil, and/or ground water are VOCs including
benzene, toluene and xylenes; other organics
including PAHs; and metals including arsenic,
lead, and chromium.
161
-------
The selected remedial action for this site
includes consolidating waste and contaminated
soil from adjacent property into the original
onsite disposal area; removing trees from the
area to provide a regular surface for the cap;
capping the landfill with a solid waste cap to
comply with State requirements; installing a
gas venting system in the cap, if necessary, to
release gas generated during tree root
decomposition; monitoring of ground water and
private wells, and evaluating results to
determine the need for any additional remedial
action; implementing institutional controls to
limit land and ground water use, and site
access restrictions including fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $2,940,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $137,300 per year for 30 years.
Costs associated with the gas venting system
are not included.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels identified for ground water are
based on State Preventive Action Limits and
include arsenic 5.0 ug/1 and chromium
5.0 ug/1. No cleanup levels have been
determined for soil or onsite wastes, as these
will be permanently contained onsite.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including deed restrictions, will be
implemented to limit land and ground water
use at the site.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Chromium; Debris: Direct Contact; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls; Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Organics; Sludge; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; Venting;
VOCs; Xylenes.
162
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 6
(Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas)
ARKWOOD, AR
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 15-acre Arkwood site is a former wood
treatment facility in Boone County,
Arkansas. Land use in the vicinity of the
site is primarily agricultural and light
industrial. Approximately 200 residences
are located within one mile of the site, and
35 domestic water supply wells are within
1.5 miles of the site. In addition,
numerous springs including New Cricket
Spring, are found on, and adjacent to the
site. The site is characterized as karst
terrain formed by the solution of limestone
and dolomite by ground water. Ground
water on, or near the site is highly
susceptible to contamination as a result of
underground cavities, enlarged fractures
and conduits which hinder monitoring and
pumping. From 1962 to 1973, Arkwood
operated a PCP and creosote wood
treatment facility at the site. Subsequently
from 1973 to 1984, Mass Merchandisers,
Inc. (MMI) leased the plant and continued
operations until the lease expired, and MMI
removed all remaining inventory and
materials offsite. In 1986, the site owner
dismantled the plant. State investigations
conducted during the 1980s documented
PCP and creosote contamination in surface
water, soil, debris, and buildings
throughout the site. Contaminated surface
features at the site include the wood
treatment facility, a sinkhole area
contaminated with oily waste, a ditch area,
a wood storage area, and an ash pile. In
1987, EPA ordered the site owner to
perform an immediate removal action,
which included implementing site access
including fencing and sign postings. This
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
remediation of all affected media, and
provides the final remedy for the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, sludge, debris, ground water and
surface water are organics including
pentachlorophenol (PCP), PAHs, and
dioxin; and oils.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 21,000
cubic yards of contaminated soil and
sludge from the railroad ditch, wood
treatment facility, storage areas and ash
pile; pretreating these materials by sieving
and washing the soil; incinerating
approximately 7,000 cubic yards of
pretreated materials exceeding cleanup
levels onsite; backfilling washed coarse
materials pretreated to below cleanup levels
as well as any residual ash;
decontaminating onsite structures and
debris, followed by onsite or offsite
disposal; covering the site with a soil cap
and revegetating the area; onsite pumping
and treatment of 3,000 gallons of oily
sinkhole liquids and any wastewater from
decontamination activities using filtration
and granular activated carbon, followed by
onsite discharge of treated liquids, and
incineration of any free phase oil; disposing
of any residuals offsite; implementing site
access restrictions including fencing;
monitoring drinking water and ground
water; providing municipal water lines to
affected residences; monitoring New Cricket
Spring for a two-year period to measure
the success of natural attenuation. If PCP
levels still exceed State standards after two
years, a treatment system will be
implemented for the spring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
is $10,300,000. O&M costs were not
provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Action levels for soil excavation and
treatment include PCP 300 mg/kg (based
on the leachability of PCP from site soil),
carcinogenic PAHs 6.0 mg/kg (W3 excess
cancer risk), and dioxin 20 ug/kg (ATSDR).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
provided.
Not
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply;
Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act-
Debris; Decontamination; Dioxin; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
163
-------
Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Oils;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; RCRA; Sludge; Soil; Soil
Wa shi ng / Fl u sh i ng; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water;
Surface Water Monitoring; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology.
CIMARRON MINING, NM
First Remedial Action
September 21, 1990
The 10.6-acre Cimarron Mining site, Lincoln
County, New Mexico, is an inactive milling
facility used to recover iron from ores
transported to the site. The land
surrounding the site supports agricultural,
commercial, and residential uses. A
shallow aquifer, which is not a potential
drinking water source, and a deeper
primary drinking water aquifer lie beneath
the site. The iron recovery process was
conducted onsite between the late 1960s
and 1979. Although cyanide was not used
in the original iron-recovery milling
process, operations changed in 1979, and
cyanide was used until 1982 to recover
precious metals. The operation of the mill
resulted in the discharge of contaminated
liquids onsite. The sources of
environmental cyanide contamination at the
site are the processed waste materials,
including tailings piles and cinder block
trench sediment piles, the cyanide solution
and tailings spillage areas, and the cyanide
solution recycling and disposal areas,
including cinder block trenches and an
unlined discharge pit. The major sources
of ground water contamination by cyanide
are the cinder block trenches and the
discharge pit. These areas of prolonged
contact between cyanide solution and
underlying soil led to cyanide
contamination in the shallow aquifer. Field
investigations revealed another abandoned
mill, known as Sierra Blanca, operated by
the same owner nearby, which will be
addressed in a second Record of Decision
(ROD). This ROD addresses contaminated
shallow ground water at the Cimarron
Mining mill area as Operable Unit 1 (OU1).
The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the debris and ground water are
inorganics including cyanide.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and discharging
contaminated shallow ground water to an
offsite publicly owned treatment works
(POTVV); ground water monitoring; removal
and offsite disposal of process chemical
drums, decontaminated tanks, and
associated piping; filling in the discharge
pit and cinder block trenches with onsite
soil and waste pile material and covering
with clean soil; plugging the onsite
abandoned water supply well; and
inspecting and maintaining the existing
fence. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $105,000, which
includes a total estimated O&M cost of
$50,825.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The discharge to the POTW will comply
with the pretreatment standard of cyanide
5 mg/1 (CWA). Ultimate cleanup goals for
the shallow aquifer are based on Federal
MCLs and State action levels including
cyanide 200 ug/1 (State and MCL).
Cyanide will be remediated to a Hazard
Index (HI) of less than or equal to 1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds:
Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact;
Filling; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Inorganics; MCLs; O&M; Offsite Discharge;
Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW); Safe
Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; Water Quality
Criteria.
CRYSTAL CHEMICAL, TX
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 24-acre Crystal Chemical site consists
of a 7-acre abandoned herbicide
manufacturing facility (referred to as the
onsite area) and 18 acres of affected
surrounding properties (referred to as the
offsite area) in Houston, Harris County,
Texas. The site lies within the 100-year
floodplain of an adjacent flood control
channel, and is underlain by a shallow
aquifer system. Surrounding land use is
164
-------
commercial/industrial. From 1968 to 1981,
herbicides, including arsenide compounds
were manufactured at the site. During that
time several structures, four evaporation
ponds, and many storage tanks were
utilized. Drums of raw and finished
product were routinely stored in the open.
Onsite soil was contaminated by herbicides
spilled from drums during transfer of raw
materials from rail cars. Contamination of
offsite soil and sediment was a result of
periodic flooding, which caused
contaminated onsite materials to be
relocated offsite. In 1981, the site was
abandoned, and approximately 99,000
gallons of chemical liquids in a storage
tank and 600,000 gallons of wastewater in
the evaporation ponds were left onsite.
Emergency Removal Actions conducted
intermittently from 1981 to 1988, included
removing chemical liquids and wastewater,
temporarily capping the site, dismantling
and decontaminating structures,
constructing drains and fencing, and
placing fill material onsite. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, and ground water is arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 55,000
cubic yards of offsite soil and sediment
with arsenic levels greater than 30 mg/kg
and redepositing the materials onsite;
treating approximately 16,500 cubic yards of
onsite soil and sediment with levels of
arsenic greater than 300 mg/kg using
in-situ vitrification; covering the onsite area
with a multi-layer cap; pumping and
treating approximately 3 million gallons of
contaminated ground water using ferric
hydroxide precipitation, flocculation,
clarification, filtration, and ion exchange;
discharging the treated water offsite to a
publicly owned treatment works (POTW),
to surface water, or reinjecting the treated
water onsite; disposing of residual sludge
at an offsite facility; conducting long-term
ground water monitoring; and
implementing institutional controls
including land use restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $18,590,740, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $140,079
for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The excavation level of arsenic is 30 mg/kg
for offsite soil and sediment and is based
on calculated health standards. Treatment
of onsite soil with greater than 300 mg/kg
arsenic will effectively treat 95% of the
onsite contamination and will reduce the
amount of leachable arsenic to 5 mg/kg.
The cleanup standard for ground water is
arsenic 0.05 mg/kg, which is based on the
Federal MCL.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land use
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure;
Leachability Tests; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTW); RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
Vitrification; Water Quality Criteria.
HARDAGE/CRINER, OK
First Remedial Action (Amendment)
November 22, 1989
The Hardage/Criner site is in an
agricultural area near Criner, McClain
County, in central Oklahoma. The site is
situated in the North Criner Creek drainage
basin, approximately 0.8 miles from the
confluence of North Criner Creek and
Criner Creek. From 1972 to 1980 the site
was operated under a State permit for the
disposal of industrial wastes including
paint sludge and solids, ink solvents, tire
manufacturing wastes, oils, other solvents,
cyanides, and plating wastes sludge. Waste
disposal practices have resulted in the
contamination of approximately 70 acres of
ground water beneath and adjacent to the
site as well as several acres of surface soil.
The principal source of contamination is
approximately 278,000 cubic yards of
sludge, waste drums, highly contaminated
soil, and waste liquids contained in three
main waste (source) areas near the center
165
-------
of the property. Additional source areas
include scattered mixing ponds, spill areas,
and runoff paths in the vicinity of the main
source areas. Dense non-aqueous phase
liquids have pooled beneath the disposal
areas and are a continuing source of
contamination to the ground water. A 1986
Record of Decision addressed source
control through incineration, stabilization,
and onsite disposal; however, the remedial
action was not implemented due to
protracted litigation. The 1989 ROD
Amendment provides a comprehensive site
remedy addressing both source control and
ground water remediation and takes into
consideration recently enacted land disposal
restrictions. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, debris, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE and other carcinogenic
compounds; other organics including PCBs
and pesticides; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead; and oils.
The selected remedial action for the site
includes source control and ground water
components. Source control remediation
includes installation of liquid extraction
wells to pump out free liquids currently
pooled in the three waste areas and any
liquids released from drums buried in the
mounds, followed by offsite treatment of
the removed organic liquids and onsite
treatment of aqueous liquids; excavation of
drummed organic liquids for offsite
destruction; excavation and consolidation of
contaminated soil adjacent to the main
source areas with placement in the main
source areas, followed by temporary
capping; treatment of the main source areas
using in-situ soil vapor extraction with
treatment of air used in soil extraction by
thermal destruction; installation of a
permanent RCRA-compliant cap once
remedial activities are complete. Ground
water components are designed to control
the spread of ground water plumes and
protect downgradient areas because of the
technical impracticability of restoration of
the bedrock aquifer. Ground water
remediation includes installation of an
interceptor trench downgradient of the
source areas to intercept and collect
contaminated ground water migrating into
bedrock zones, and a second trench or
equally effective system of extraction wells
to intercept and collect contaminated
ground water contaminating the alluvium;
design and construction of an onsite
ground water treatment system to treat
both organic and inorganic contaminants
before discharge of treated water to surface
water. Contaminants already present in the
alluvium will be allowed to dissipate by
natural dilution, natural attentuation, and
flushing; however, active restoration will be
implemented if contaminant reduction goals
are not met. In addition, institutional
controls, surface water controls, and
multimedia monitoring will be
implemented, and the current provision of
an alternate water supply will be
continued. The estimated present worth
cost of this remedial action is $62,904,655,
which includes an annual O&M cost of
$1,300,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The goal of the soil vapor extraction is a
99% reduction of the VOC concentrations
found at the beginning of treatment.
Beyond reduction of the source, the goal of
this action is to restore the ground water,
especially the alluvial aquifer associated
with North Criner Creek, to levels below
MCLs, including chromium 50 ug/1. If
contaminant concentrations in the alluvium
increase after trench installation and
pumping, or there is a decline in the mass
of contaminants of less than 40% in 10
years, active restoration of the alluvium
will be implemented.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including deed restrictions and
maintenance of the availability of an
alternate water supply system will be
implemented to restrict access to the site
and contaminated ground water.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act;
Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure;
Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Oils; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; PCE; Pesticides;
Plume Management; RCRA; ROD
Amendment; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
166
-------
Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Collection/Diversion; Surface
Water Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
TCE; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction;
VOCs.
JACKSONVILLE MUNICIPAL
LANDFILL, AR
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 80-acre Jacksonville Municipal Landfill
site is an inactive landfill outside the city
limits of Jacksonville, Lonoke County,
Arkansas, in a floodplain area.
Neighboring the site are the Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill and the Vertac Chemical
Superfund sites. From 1960 to 1973,
approximately half the site was used to
landfill unknown types or quantities of
drummed or loose waste. Before 1969,
waste was openly burned prior to onsite
disposal in unlined trenches. During this
period, trenching was used as the sole
disposal method. EPA holds evidence that
the onsite wastes were physically and
chemically similar to the wastes at the
Vertac Chemical Superfund site, and that
the waste may have originated at Vertac.
Dioxin was found in some of the 10-50
above-ground waste drums at the site.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
the drummed waste, soil, and loose debris,
and their offsite disposal at the Vertac
facility. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and debris are
organics including pesticides, such as
dioxin.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes sampling of soil to determine the
amount of contaminated soil and debris
onsite; excavating, with offsite thermal
treatment and disposal of soil and debris
exceeding 2,3,7,8-TCDD 10 mg/kg at the
Vertac Chemical Superfund site; excavating,
disinfecting, and onsite disposal of debris
removed from the 10 mg/kg
TCDD-contaminated areas; backfilling and
covering the remaining soil and debris with
clean soil; revegetating excavated areas at
the site; monitoring ground water; and
implementing institutional controls
including deed, ground water use, and land
use restrictions. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is
$1,949,940, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $523,730.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil action levels are based on action levels
established by the Centers for Disease
Control. Soil with concentrations exceeding
2,3,7,8-TCDD 10.0 mg/kg will be excavated
and transported offsite for treatment. Soil
with concentrations exceeding 2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.0 mg/kg but less than 10.0 mg/kg will
be covered with one foot of soil.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to limit
land use and ground water use on, and
downgradient of the site.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Dioxin; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Disposal; Organics; Pesticides; RCRA; Soil.
PAGANO SALVAGE, NM
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 1.4-acre Pagano Salvage site is in Los
Lunas, Valencia County, New Mexico, and
consists of a family-run salvage business
and a residence. During 1983, salvage
operations at the site included purchasing
"high technology" scrap material from
Federal facilities such as transformers,
drums containing waste fluids, and
capacitors. Site inspections in 1984, 1985,
and 1986 revealed several areas of soil
contamination in the yard due to leaks
from scrap materials, which released
PCB-contaminated oil into the soil. These
areas included two surface burn areas, a
stained soil area, and a surface pool of oil.
In 1990, EPA removed approximately 5,100
cubic yards (i.e., soil in excess of 10 mg/kg
PCBs based on TSCA cleanup policy) of
contaminated soil and debris for disposal in
an approved RCRA facility offsite. Soil
containing less than 10 mg/kg PCB was
covered with a 10-12 inch soil cover. Soil
sampling has confirmed that this removal
has resolved the PCB contamination at the
site and EPA proposes no additional
167
-------
remedial action. Based on this rationale,
there are no primary contaminants of
concern affecting this site.
The selected remedial action for this site is
a no action remedy with ground water
monitoring for one year at the request of
the State.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Ground Water Monitoring;
No Action Remedy.
ROGERS ROAD
MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, AR
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 10-acre Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
site is an inactive landfill in a residential
and agricultural area in Pulaski County,
outside the city limits of Jacksonville,
Arkansas. Approximately 50 residences are
located within one-half mile of the site.
Furthermore, the site lies within a 100-year
floodplain and has poor drainage because
of slow percolation of rainwater. From
1953 until 1974, approximately one half of
the site was used intermittently as a
municipal waste disposal facility. Specific
waste types and quantities are unknown;
however, wastes appear to have been
disposed of in a long excavated trench and
in several surface piles. In addition,
chemical waste materials probably
originating from the nearby Vertac
Chemical Corporation, including herbicides
and associated dioxin impurities, have been
disposed of at the site. Currently, as many
as 50 drums of contaminated materials are
estimated to be onsite, of which 30 drums
are visibly corroded with their contents
exposed. Investigations by EPA beginning
in 1983 revealed that a 1/2-acre drum
disposal area containing drums, waste piles
of other types of contaminated debris, and
associated soil contaminated with herbicides
and dioxin, comprises the principal threat
from the site. Vertac Chemical Corporation
wastes were also disposed of at the
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill Superfund
site, which is 1/2 mile east of the site. To
achieve economies of scale, the two sites
will be remediated concurrently, including
excavating highly contaminated wastes and
soil, and transporting these to Vertac for
final treatment and disposition. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and debris are organics including
dioxin/furan (2,3,7,8-TCDD), the pesticide
dieldrin, and herbicide compounds (2,4,5-T,
2,4-D, and 2,4,5-TP).
The selected remedial action for this site
includes additional soil sampling with
excavation of approximately 50 cubic yards
of highly contaminated soil and debris (i.e.,
greater than 10 ug/kg of 2,3,7,8-TCDD),
followed by offsite temporary storage of the
material at the Vertac Chemical Corporation
Superfund site; conducting thermal
treatment of all Rogers Road site material
stored at the Vertac site, followed by
residual analysis to evaluate treatment
effectiveness, backfilling of residuals on the
Vertac site, and revegetating backfilled ash
areas; steam cleaning and disposing of
debris removed from the Rogers Road site
at the Vertac site; backfilling excavated
areas and the open trench with
uncontaminated native soil and
decontaminated refuse; covering onsite soil,
debris, and waste contaminated at low
levels (i.e., below the cleanup criteria) with
twelve inches of native soil; inspecting and
maintaining soil caps and fences; ground
water monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls including ground
water and land use restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $1,226,000, which
includes a total O&M cost of $384,000 over
30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Pre-remedial action levels have been
identified and will be used to determine
where soil remediation is required.
Post-remedial treatment goals will be used
to assure that effective treatment has been
achieved. Moderately-contaminated soil
and debris triggering action levels,
including 2,3,7,8-TCDD between 1 and
10 ug/kg (10"5 excess cancer risk), dieldrin
greater than 37.0 ug/kg (10"7 excess cancer
risk), and/or a dieldrin and herbicide
(2,4,5-T and 2,4,5-TP) combination resulting
in a cumulative Hazard Index (HI)
168
-------
exceeding 0.7, will be covered with 12
inches of clean soil. Thermal treatment
will be used for approximately 50 cubic
yards of soil and debris with 2,3,7,8-TCDD
exceeding 10 ug/kg. Treatment goals
include achieving 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.0 ug/kg
(health-based) or a 99.9999% destruction
removal efficiency (40 CFR 264.343), and
2,4-D 10,000 ug/kg (40 CFR 268.43),
2,4,5-TP 7,900 ug/kg (40 CFR 268.43), and
dieldrin 37 ug/kg Thealth-based), as well
as a combined dieldrin and herbicide
cumulative HI less than 0.7. The overall
residual risk attained by these goals will
be less than 8 x 10s and a maximum
cumulative HI of 1.0.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls including land use controls will be
implemented to limit ground water use on,
and immediately downgradient of the site.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Debris; Decontamination; Dioxin; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure;
Leachability Tests; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Treatment; Onsite Containment;
Organics; Pesticides; RCRA; Soil; Temporary
Storage; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology.
TENTH STREET DUMP/JUNKYARD, OK
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 3.5-acre Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard
site is an inactive landfill in Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma, within the North Canadian
River's 100-year floodplain. There are two
residences and a salvage yard within 100
yards of the site. From 1951 to 1979, the
site was used, in succession, as a municipal
landfill, a privately owned and operated
salvage yard, and an automobile salvage
yard. Waste materials accepted by the first
salvage yard included paint thinners, old
transformers, and tires. Dielectric fluid
that contained PCBs was drained from old
transformers, stored in barrels, and sold.
During this PCB recovery process,
substantial quantities of PCB-contaminated
oil were spilled onto the ground at the site.
In 1983, EPA site inspections located 20
drums, some of which were corroded and
leaking contaminated material into the soil.
Soil samples, taken on and around the site,
showed contamination by hazardous
materials, particularly, high levels of PCBs.
In 1985, EPA completed removal actions,
which included disposal of drums
containing hazardous waste,
decontamination and relocation of junk
automobiles, consolidation of contaminated
soil to the center of the site, installation of
a plastic liner and a clay cap, and
installation of security fencing. This Record
of Decision addresses soil contamination at
the site. It is estimated that 8,500 cubic
yards of soil are contaminated by PCBs,
with 7,500 cubic yards of this total having
PCBs levels above the TSCA PCB spill
cleanup policy level of 25 mg/kg. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil are organics including PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing the red clay cover and
plastic liner; excavating an estimated 7,500
cubic yards of PCB-contaminated soil with
concentrations of 25 mg/kg and higher,
followed by treatment of the excavated soil
by chemical dechlorination and carbon
adsorption to control air emissions; and
backfilling and regrading the excavated
area with clean and treated soil. The
estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $4,044,000. There are no
O&M costs associated with this remedial
action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminated soil with greater than
300 mg/kg PCB (an order of magnitude
higher than the health-based goal) is
considered the principal threat. However,
the soil excavation goal is PCB 25 mg/kg
(TSCA), due to the cost effectiveness of
treating soil with low levels of PCBs along
with the highly contaminated soil, and is
based on a 10* excess cancer risk level.
Soil residuals will contain less than
2 mg/kg PCBs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Onsite Disposal;
169
-------
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Soil;
Toxic Substances Control Act; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology.
TEXARKANA WOOD PRESERVING, TX
First Remedial Action
September 25, 1990
The 25-acre Texarkana Wood Preserving
site is a former wood treating facility in
Bowie County, Texas, within the Days
Creek 100-year floodplain. Surrounding
land use is industrial, residential, and
agricultural. Since the early 1900s, several
lumber-related businesses have operated at
the site, with documented creosote-based
wood treating operations starting in 1954.
By 1971, Texarkana was also using creosote
and pentachlorophenol for wood
preserving. State investigations of the site
between 1968 and 1984 showed Texarkana
to be negligent or delinquent in fulfilling
various permit requirements. Fund-lead
removal actions from 1986 to 1988 included
implementation of site access restrictions,
and construction of a berm around, and
pumping down the creosote-contaminated
onsite processing ponds to prevent runoff
and overflow. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses onsite contaminated soil
near the processing ponds and
contaminated ground water in a shallow
aquifer. Remediation of ground water in a
deeper aquifer will be addressed in a
subsequent ROD. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, sludge, and ground water are
organics including dioxin, PAHs, pesticides,
such as dioxin, and phenols.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 77,000
cubic yards of contaminated soil (includes
any affected sediment and sludge),
followed by onsite treatment using
incineration, leachability testing of residual
ash, and onsite backfilling of ash with the
installation of a soil cover and revegetation;
pumping and treatment of approximately
16 million gallons of contaminated ground
water from the shallow aquifer using
carbon adsorption, with onsite or offsite
regeneration or offsite disposal of the spent
carbon, pretreatment using ferric hydroxide
precipitation and flocculation, followed by
clarification and filtration as needed, and
reinjecting the treated water onsite into the
shallow aquifer; and implementing
institutional controls, including deed
restrictions to limit land use. The
estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $47,500,000, which
includes a total O&M cost of $1,060,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil remediation will reduce the excess
cancer risk to below 10*. Ground water
will be restored to its beneficial use as
drinking water. Chemical-specific goals for
soil include carcinogenic PAHs 3 mg/kg,
total PAHs 2450 mg/kg, dioxin 20 ug/kg,
and pentachlorophenol 150 mg/kg.
Chemical-specific goals for ground water
include carcinogenic PAHs 10 ug/1
(detection limit), dioxin 0.001 mg/1
(Proposed MCL). CWA requirements for
PAHs and dioxin in ground water are
lower than the above values, but ground
water will be remediated to below
detection limits as indicated.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to restrict
future site land use. Water use restrictions
cannot be enforced in Texas, however.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Closure; Clean Water
Act; Closure Requirements; Dioxin; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls;
Leachability Tests; MCLs; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
Pesticides; Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Sediment; Sludge; Soil;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
TINKER APB
(SOLDIER CREEK/BLDG 3001), OK
First Remedial Action
August 16, 1990
The 220-acre Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Building 3001) site, which includes
an active military facility and the adjacent
Soldier Creek is in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma. Surrounding land use is urban
residential. Underlying the site is a
170
-------
surficial perched aquifer and a sole-source
aquifer for the region. The Building 3001
(B3001) facility is used as an aircraft
overhaul and modification complex for jet
engine service, repair, and upgrades. From
the 1940s to the 1970s, organic solvents
were used to degrease metal parts in
subsurface pits. Ground water
contamination has occurred onsite as a
result of seepage from these pits, direct
discharge of solvents to storm drains, spills,
and faulty drainage system connections. A
North Tank Area contains several active
and abandoned underground waste oil and
fuel tanks. Contamination in this area has
resulted from leaking tanks and fuel spills
directly onto the ground. In addition, there
is onsite VOC contamination, which may be
the result of leaking utility lines in the
area. Investigations by the Air Force from
1982 to 1989 documented ground water
contamination under the B3001 complex;
the potential threat of further contamination
from Pit Q-51, one of the former
degreasing pits; and that underground
storage tanks in the North Tank Area were
leaking. In 1985 in response to the
detection of onsite contamination, the Air
Force removed an abandoned 13,000 gallon
gasoline tank from the North Tank Area,
closed three contaminated production wells,
and cleaned all of the onsite degreasing
pits with the exception of Pit Q-51, which
contains approximately 45 gallons of
contaminated liquid waste. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses remediation of
onsite ground water, along with remedial
actions relating to Pit Q-51 and the North
Tank Area. A subsequent ROD will
address contamination associated with
Soldier Creek. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil, debris, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other
organics including phenols; and metals
including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes ground water pumping and onsite
treatment using air stripping to remove
VOCs, precipitation to remove metals, and
fine filtration to remove any remaining
organics and metals; using the treated
water in onsite industrial processes;
disposing of any residuals from the
treatment processes offsite; recovering 6,000
to 12,000 gallons of hydrocarbons floating
above the ground water table by using a
dual fluid production system, followed by
offsite disposal of the hydrocarbons;
removing approximately 45 gallons of
liquid waste from Pit Q-51, and placing the
liquid waste into 55-gallon drums; steam
cleaning, backfilling and covering the pit
with a concrete slab; storing the drums
temporarily onsite; disposing of waste and
wash water from the steam cleaning
process offsite; removing and disposing of
a 750-gallon waste tank, and properly
abandoning, demolishing and backfilling
the onsite 235,000-gallon fuel oil tank at the
North Tank Area; treating the contaminated
soil from the North Tank Area using vapor
extraction, with destruction of vapors in a
thermal combustor; and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $13,198308.
O&M costs were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil remediation goals include a 99%
removal of organic contaminants at the
North Tank Area. Chemical-specific
ground water cleanup goals include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), PCE 5 ug/1 (MCL),
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL), and lead 50 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Debris;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCE; Phenols; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; Sole-Source Aquifer; Solvents;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Temporary Storage; Toluene; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs;
Xylenes.
171
-------
VERTAC, AR
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1990
The Vertac site, a former herbicide and
pesticide manufacturing facility in
Jacksonville, Arkansas, is comprised of an
onsite and offsite area. Production of
herbicides and pesticides, including "Agent
Orange," began in 1948 and resulted in
extensive onsite contamination. The offsite
contamination, which is the focus of this
Record of Decision (ROD), resulted from
improper discharge of wastewater
generated during onsite operations. Prior
to 1960, untreated wastewater was
discharged directly into Rocky Branch
Creek, which flows into Bayou Metro a few
miles south of the site. Beginning in the
1960s, wastewater was discharged to the
city's Old Sewage Treatment Plant, which
had been upgraded with a pretreatment
facility that included an aerated lagoon and
oxidation ponds (West Wastewater
Treatment Plant). A solvent treatment
process was later added to remove dioxin
from the product. This process, however,
created contaminated liquid and solid waste
residues that were drummed and buried
or stored onsite until 1987, when pesticide
production ceased. As part of an effort to
improve onsite disposal methods, a cooling
water pond and equalization basin were
closed, and sediment was removed and
placed in an onsite sediment vault in 1986.
The burial area was capped, a french drain
and leachate collection system were
installed, and ground water monitoring was
initiated. Since 1986, EPA has made
various improvements to the onsite area
and ordered the site owners to remove
some offsite soil and install fencing in the
Rocky Branch floodplain. Currently, the
State has ordered that offsite contamination
including remediation of process
wastewater to Rocky Branch Creek,
discharge of pretreated process wastewater
to city sewer lines, and stormwater runoff
from the Vertac onsite area. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, and sludge is
2,3,7,8-tetra-chlordibenzo-p-dioxin.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing contaminated sediment
from the active sewage lines between the
Vertac plant and the West Wastewater
Treatment Plant, with onsite incineration of
sediment, followed by onsite disposal of
residual ash; grouting abandoned sewer
lines; removing sludge from the sludge
digester at the Old Sewage Treatment
Plant; incinerating the sludge onsite,
followed by onsite disposal of residual ash;
capping the sludge drying beds with clean
soil and demolishing treatment units after
removing and treating the accumulated
water at the Old Sewage Treatment Plant,
followed by onsite discharge of treated
water to Rocky Branch Creek; draining and
capping the aeration basin at the West
Wastewater Treatment Plant; removing soil
and sediment with TCE levels greater than
1 ug/kg from Rocky Branch Creek and
Bayou Metro floodplains; incinerating the
contaminated soil and sediment onsite,
followed by onsite disposal of residual ash;
continuing to enforce a commercial fishing
ban and a sport fishing advisory. The
estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $14,000,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $57,000
for year one and $46,000 for years 2-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry has recommended a
soil/sediment action level for TCDD of
1 ug/kg for the offsite area, which will
result in the reduction of carcinogenic risk
from as high as 10"3 due to the sewer line
sediment to 10"5 or 10"6, depending on the
point of exposure.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and
land use restrictions will be implemented
at the West Wastewater Treatment Plant
and the Old Sewage Treatment Plant to
maintain the commercial/industrial zoning.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Closure; Clean Water
Act; Dioxin; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls; O&M;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; RCRA; Sediment;
Sludge; Soil; Treatment Technology.
172
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 7
(Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska)
FAIRFIELD COAL
GASIFICATION PLANT, IA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 21, 1990
The 1.3-acre Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant is a former coal gas generator plant
in the town of Fairfield, Jefferson County,
Iowa. Since 1917, the site has been owned
by the local power company. From 1878 to
1950, gas was generated from coal as an
energy source using various processes, each
producing an array of by-products that
were either sold or disposed of onsite.
Since 1937, coal tar and ammonium liquor
wastes were disposed of onsite. In 1986,
site investigations by the power company
found evidence of surface contamination
and contamination in the underlying
ground water as a result of leaching from
buried coal tar wastes. The source of
contamination was determined to be the
sediment and soil associated with a relief
gas holder, a gas holder pit area, and a tar
separator. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes; other organics
including PAHs; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for the site
includes excavating 3,800 cubic yards of
PAH-contaminated coal tar waste, soil, and
sediment from the source areas and an
additional undetermined quantity of soil
from these site areas after separating and
decontaminating larger items, followed by
offsite treatment using incineration;
pumping and treatment of an estimated
1,577,000 gallons of contaminated ground
water using filtration, polymer injection,
and settling out of the sludge wastes,
followed by treatment of the supernatant
using carbon adsorption with offsite
discharge to a publicly owned treatment
works (POTW) or onsite use of the treated
water in a nutrient addition treatment
process; disposing of the settled sludge in
accordance with approved disposal
methods; treating the coal gas migration
areas by enhanced bioremediation if a pilot
study proves successful; and implementing
institutional controls, including ground
water and land use restrictions, and site
access restrictions, such as fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $5,815,000, which
includes an estimated O&M cost of
$4,762,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will be treated to reduce the
level of contaminants to levels acceptable to
the State, including benzene 1 ug/1 (10*
cancer risk level), toluene 2,000 ug/1
(lifetime health advisory), and xylenes
10,000 ug/1 (lifetime health advisory).
Ground water will be treated to best
available detection levels. If the ground
water remediation levels can not be
attained, alternate concentration levels may
be established or a chemical-specific ARAR
waiver may be invoked in an amended
ROD. Cleanup levels for soil are based on
risk assessment and include total PAHs
500 ug/kg, carcinogenic PAHs 100 ug/kg,
and benzene 241 ug/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground
water and land use restrictions will be
implemented to prevent direct contact with
contaminants.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act;
Decontamination; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); RCRA; Sediment; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; Toluene;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Xylenes.
173
-------
HASTINGS GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION, NE
(EAST INDUSTRIAL PARK)
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The Hastings Groundwater Contamination
site is a contaminated aquifer in and near
the city of Hastings, Adams County,
Nebraska. The site consists of seven source
areas, or subsites, contaminated with
industrial chemicals. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses contaminated
surface soil (1-10 feet) on approximately 14
acres of the 2,600-acre Hastings East
Industrial Park subsite. The subsite is on
a portion of the former Hastings Naval
Ammunition Depot (NAD). Investigations
have detected three major types of
contaminants in onsite soil, including
explosives such as trinitrotoluene (TNT),
carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
and metals. The remedy is designed to
control the migration of contaminants from
surface soil to the underlying aquifer. One
or more future RODs for this subsite will
address contaminated ground water, and
possibly vadose zone remediation. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil are organics including PAHs;
metals including arsenic, chromium, and
lead; and TNT.
The selected remedial action for this subsite
includes excavating and treating
approximately 125,900 cubic yards of
contaminated soil. Treatment of the
excavated soil includes onsite incineration
of an estimated 16,400 cubic yards of soil
containing high levels of organic
contaminants (e.g., TNT exceeding
660 mg/kg, PAHs exceeding 1.8 mg/kg)
with final residue disposition based on
residual analysis results; stabilizing
approximately 39,000 cubic yards of
metal-contaminated soil followed by placing
the soil in an onsite RCRA Subtitle C
hazardous waste landfill; and stabilizing
approximately 70,500 cubic yards of soil
with low levels of organic and explosive
contamination (less than 104 excess cancer
risk), if effective, and placing the stabilized
soil in the constructed onsite landfill. If
stabilizing the low-level
organic-contaminated soil is ineffective, the
soil will be placed directly in the landfill.
If soil is RCRA characteristic hazardous
waste, it will be treated to the appropriate
RCRA best demonstrated available
technology treatment standard or to the soil
and debris variance levels prior to
placement in the landfill. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
is $45,000,000, which includes an estimated
annual O&M cost of $86,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil with concentrations exceeding TNT
660 mg/kg or PAHs 1.8 mg/kg
(carcinogenic risk exceeding 104) will be
remediated by incineration. Cleanup goals
for the surface soil contaminants include
TNT 2.5 mg/kg (based on carcinogenic
risk), total PAHs 50 ug/kg (based on
analytical detection limits), arsenic
11 mg/kg (background levels), chromium
230 mg/kg (noncarcinogenic hazards), and
lead 69 mg/kg (noncarcinogenic hazards).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Background Levels;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Direct Contact; Excavation;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Lead;
Metals; O&M; Organics; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; PAHs; RCRA; Soil; Soil
Washing; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology.
HASTINGS GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION, NE
(FAR-MAR-CO)
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The Hastings Groundwater Contamination
site (FAR-MAR-CO) is a contaminated
aquifer in and near the city of Hastings,
Adams County, Nebraska. The site consists
of seven source areas, or subsites,
contaminated with volatile industrial
chemicals. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses the Zone 2 portion of the
FAR-MAR-CO subsite, which has been
divided into two general areas of
contamination referred to as Zone 1 and
Zone 2. Zone 1, which includes grain
elevators and areas to the north of the
174
-------
elevators, contains soil, soil-gas, and ground
water contaminated with ethylene
dibromide and carbon tetrachloride
originating from the disposal of liquid
grain fumigants used in grain elevator
operations. Zone 1 contamination was
addressed in a 1988 ROD that documented
the selection of a remedy to construct a soil
vapor extraction system. Zone 2, which
includes the area south of the grain
elevators (between the elevators and
manufacturing and production buildings
owned and operated by the Hastings
Irrigation Pipe Company (HIPCO)) contains
soil contamination primarily due to
1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) resulting from
the disposal of cleaning solvents used in
the manufacturing operations. In December
1989, HIPCO performed a removal action
excavating contaminated soil in Zone 2.
Subsequent testing revealed that the
concentration of TCA in Zone 2 had been
reduced to a protective level. Response
actions for ground water contamination
near the FAR-MAR-CO subsite, however,
will be addressed in subsequent remedial
activities.
The selected remedial action for this site is
that no further action be taken at this time
with regard to the TCA soil contamination.
Due to the small amount of residual
contamination remaining in the soil and the
significant depth to the water table, the
possibility of transport of TCA from this
source to ground water is minimal.
Ground water monitoring will continue on
a semi-annual basis for two years. HIPCO
will conduct the ground water monitoring
and has agreed to reimburse the EPA for
all oversight costs. There are no additional
costs associated with this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Ground Water Monitoring;
No Action Remedy.
LINDSAY MANUFACTURING, NE
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 42-acre Lindsay Manufacturing site is
an irrigation sprinkler manufacturing
facility in Lindsay, Platte County, Nebraska.
The site is in a topographic low created by
Shell Creek, a USDA-designated wetland.
Part of the site is also within a 100-year
floodplain, and a sand and gravel aquifer
underlies the site. Sprinkler manufacturing
operations began in 1958, and until 1982,
10,000 to 15,000 gallons of spent acid from
a galvanizing process was piped monthly
to an earthen unlined disposal pit. After
1982, a wastewater treatment facility was
used. In addition, small quantities of
solvents and degreasers were burned in
two burn areas, or disposed of at the rear
of the facility in a disposal pit. Test wells
for the 1982 treatment facility construction
showed acid contamination of ground
water. In 1984, Lindsay and the State
performed interim remedial measures to
extract and treat ground water using
precipitation and flocculation technologies.
Investigations from 1987-1989 revealed soil
and ground water contamination by
organics and metals throughout the site.
This ROD addresses both the remediation
of soil source areas and the enhancement of
the ground water treatment already
underway as a result of the interim action.
The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs, including PCE; and metals including
chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for the site
includes vacuum extraction of volatile
organic compounds from soil, followed by
a carbon adsorption filter system before
vapor emission, with full-scale
implementation based on the results of a
pilot study; onsite pumping and treatment
of ground water using precipitation and
flocculation, followed by sedimentation of
the flocculant, with onsite discharge to
surface water, and disposing of dewatered
solid residuals offsite at a local landfill.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $3,006,600, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $636,000
for 5 years.
175
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup levels are based on the more
stringent of either SDWA MCLs or State
regulations. These levels will reduce
lifetime cancer risks to between 104 and 10*
for carcinogenic compounds, and the
Hazard Index (HI) to less than 1 for
non-carcinogens. Chemical-specific ground
water cleanup goals include PCE 5 ug/1
(proposed MCL), chromium 0.05 mg/1
(MCL), and lead 0.05 mg/1 (MCL). Specific
cleanup levels for soil were not provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground
water use restrictions will be implemented
to prohibit drinking water well construction
within the contaminant plume.
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction;
VOCs; Wetlands.
MIDWEST MANUFACTURING/
NORTH FARM, IA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 8-acre Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm site is located on a manufacturing site
owned and operated by Smith-Jones, Inc. in
Kellog, Iowa. Land use in the area is
primarily industrial. From 1973 to 1981,
Smith-Jones engaged in electroplating and
painting operations of manufactured
products, which involved the use of TCE to
clean the product before it was coated with
the metal. In 1977, the State required
treatment of the wastewaters to precipitate
metals. The solid residuals were stored in
an above-ground tank, then transferred
periodically to an unlined disposal cell
onsite. Site inspections in the early 1980s,
by EPA revealed elevated heavy metal
concentrations in the 170 cubic yard waste
disposal cell, the surrounding soil, as well
as a 7,200 cubic foot waste metals pile and
a borrow pit area. Ground water sampling
revealed contamination of the alluvial
aquifer underlying the site. This ROD
addresses both source control and ground
water remediation at the site. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the
soil/waste and ground water are VOCs,
including PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes;
and metals, including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes installing a low permeability cap
over the waste disposal cell in accordance
with RCRA landfill closure requirements;
treating ground water using air stripping,
and possible treatment of vapor/air mixture
using carbon adsorption, and filtering water
to remove inorganics, if needed;
discharging the treated water onsite to the
Skunk River or offsite to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW); implementing
institutional controls including deed and
ground water use restrictions; and ground
water monitoring for 30 years. The
estimated capital cost for this remedial
action is $288,419, which includes a total
O&M cost of $200,425 for 25 to 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water contamination at the site will
be reduced to meet Iowa Anti-Degradation
Requirements.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and
ground water use restrictions will be
implemented until remediation is
completed.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic;
Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Landfill Closure; Leachability Tests; Lead;
MCLGs; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Discharge; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW); RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
VOCs; Xylenes.
176
-------
MISSOURI ELECTRIC WORKS, MO
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 6.4-acre Missouri Electric Works
(MEW) site is an electrical equipment sales,
service, and remanufacturing operation in
Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Intermittent
onsite runoff channels flow into Cape
LaCroix Creek located 0.7 miles east of the
site, which enters the Mississippi River, 1.1
miles to the southeast. A wetland area is
located 700 feet south of the site. Since
1953, MEW has recycled materials from old
electrical equipment, including the reuse of
filtered transformer oil. More than 16,000
transformers have been repaired or
scrapped, and approximately 28,000 gallons
of transformer oil received onsite were
never recycled. The MEW property, as
well as adjacent properties, have been
contaminated with PCBs as the result of
inadequate storage and handling of
transformers and PCB-contaminated
transformer oils. In addition, spills and
disposal of industrial spent solvents
occurred onsite affecting ground water
underlying the site. In 1984, preliminary
State and EPA investigations found leaking
drums of transformer oil onsite and PCB
levels in soil of up to 21,000 mg/kg.
Based on this, in 1984, the State required
removal of approximately 5,000 gallons of
drummed waste oil. EPA conducted
investigations from 1985 to 1987 that
revealed onsite PCB contamination in the
soil at levels of up to 58,000 mg/kg.
Offsite migration of PCBs also was detected
during these investigations. In 1988, the
EPA required MEW to notify the public of
site contamination, limit exposure to
employees and the public, and minimize
movement of PCB-contaminated soil offsite
from runoff and erosion. In 1989, barriers
were installed across runoff channels to
intercept contaminated runoff. This Record
of Decision (ROD) addresses both
contaminated soil and sediment removal, as
well as the treatment of affected ground
water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, and TCE; and organics including
PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating PCB-contaminated soil
and sediment and treating these by
incineration onsite; placing exhaust gases
through flue-gas coolers and particulate
removal systems; removing acid gases
in-situ; backfilling with residual materials,
based on leachability test results;
constructing a soil cover over the site;
pumping and treatment of ground water
with filtration and treatment via air
stripping with subsequent carbon
adsorption; discharging the treated water
offsite to a surface drainage ditch between
the site and the wetlands or to a publicly
owned treatment works (POTW). The
estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $9,130,000, which
included an estimated annual O&M cost of
$64,010 for 15 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminant levels for soil and sediment
after treatment will represent an excess
upper bound lifetime cancer risk of 2 x 10"5.
Cleanup levels for ground water will be
10"5 and cleanup levels will meet the TSCA
PCB Spill Cleanup Policy, State water
quality standards and Federal MCLs for
VOCs. Chemical-specific goals include TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL) for ground water, PCB
10 mg/kg (TSCA) for soil to a depth of 4
feet, and PCB 100 mg/kg (TSCA) for soil
below a 4-foot depth.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
and/or land use restrictions will be
implemented to limit the site to industrial
or commercial use.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Air
Stripping; Benzene; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls;
Leachability Tests; MCLGs; MCLs; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCBs; PCE; Public
Exposure; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act-
Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Wetlands.
177
-------
NORTHWESTERN STATES
PORTLAND CEMENT, IA
First Remedial Action - Final
June 26, 1990
The Northwestern States Portland Cement
site, a cement manufacturing facility, is in
Mason City, Cerro Gordo County, Iowa.
Calmus Creek flows between the
Northwestern States Portland Cement
Company (NWSPCC) facility and another
cement manufacturing plant facility located
just north of the site. The site includes a
150-acre area named the West Quarry
where NWSPCC disposed of 2 million tons
of waste cement kiln dust from 1969 to
1985. Local ground water and surface
water have been impacted by elevated pH
levels as a result of waste cement kiln dust
disposal in the West Quarry. Two seeps
emerged from the northeastern portion of
the West Quarry in 1979 with high pH
water from the seeps flowing overland into
Calmus Creek. In 1984, the State found
elevated pH levels in Calmus Creek
downstream of the seep area, and in 1985
ordered NWSPCC to cease discharge from
the seep area to Calmus Creek and to cease
kiln dust disposal in the quarry. In 1987,
NWSPCC installed an acid-neutralization
system to treat the seep water and to
dewater the West Quarry pond, the open
area of the quarry filled with
approximately 420 million gallons of water.
This action has significantly decreased the
contact of the water with the kiln dust and,
as a result, pH levels in the quarry water
have declined. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses the contamination source,
the cement kiln dust disposed of in the
West Quarry, and the resulting ground
water and surface water contamination.
The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water and surface
water are organics including phenols;
metals including chromium and lead; and
other inorganics including waste cement
kiln dust.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes continued acid neutralization of
the water from the dewatered West Quarry,
followed by discharge of the neutralized
water to Calmus Creek; construction of a
permanent drainage system in the
dewatered West Quarry to collect
precipitation runoff and ground water
inflow to the West Quarry, followed by
onsite treatment of contaminated water
prior to discharge of the treated water to
Calmus Creek; installation of bedrock
dewatering wells to collect contaminated
ground water beneath the West Quarry, to
prevent migration of the contaminated
ground water from the site, and to
maintain ground water levels below the
kiln dust; installation of kiln dust
dewatering wells, if necessary, to facilitate
kiln dust dewatering; capping of the West
Quarry area containing cement kiln dust;
pumping and treatment of ground water;
and monitoring of ground water and
treated discharge. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is
$2,037,129, with estimated O&M costs of
$210,000 for year one and $65,000 for
subsequent years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Discharges to Calmus Creek will meet State
effluent limitations including pH 6.0 to 9.0
and phenols 0.05 mg/1. Treated ground
water will meet State ground water action
levels and SDWA MCLs, including
chromium 0.05 mg/1 (MCL), lead 0.05 mg/1
(MCL), and pH 6.5 to 8.5 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Chromium;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Inorganics; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; Phenols; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standard/Regulations; Surface Water;
Treatment Technology.
SHENANDOAH STABLES, MO
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The Shenandoah Stables (SS) site is located
in a rural area near Moscow Mills, Lincoln
County, Missouri, within the upper
floodplain of Crooked Creek. The property
includes an enclosed arena and horse
stables building, a number of single family
residences, a livestock operation, and other
small businesses on approximately 5- to
10-acre land parcels around the facility. In
178
-------
1971, the area inside the arena was sprayed
with approximately 1,500 gallons of
dioxin-contaminated waste oil for dust
control purposes. Subsequently, a number
of adverse effects were noted in horses,
other animals, and in humans. In two
separate removals during 1971 and 1972,
approximately 24 to 26 inches of the
contaminated materials were removed and
disposed of either offsite or onsite. EPA
investigations in 1982 identified
contamination at the facility by dioxin
levels greater than 1,750 ug/kg, with
approximately 8,600 yd2 of interior and
exterior site areas affected. A 1988 Record
of Decision (ROD) documented the
remedial action, which involved excavating
and interim onsite storage of
dioxin-contaminated soil exceeding Federal
and State health-based levels. This ROD
addresses the final remedy for the site, the
removal of 3,471 cubic yards of
contaminated materials currently stored
onsite in 2,660 separate containers. The
primary contaminant of concern affecting
the soil and debris is dioxin.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes transporting of 3,471 cubic yards
of contaminated materials offsite to the
Times Beach Superfund site for thermal
treatment, followed by land disposal of
treatment residuals offsite; and restoring the
Shenandoah Stables site by decontaminating
and dismantling the onsite storage
buildings. The estimated total cost for this
remedial action is $2,800,000. There are no
O&M costs associated with this remedial
action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Thermal treatment will ensure 99.9999%
destruction and removal of dioxin from the
contaminated soil and debris.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Debris;
Decontamination; Dioxin; Direct Contact;
Floodplain; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Organics; RCRA; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatment
Technology.
WAVERLY GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION, NE
First Remedial Action - Final
September 26, 1990
The Waverly Groundwater Contamination
site is in Waverly, Lancaster County,
Nebraska. At this municipally owned site,
the ground water aquifer provides 100% of
the drinking water for the community of
approximately 2,000 people through the
municipal water system. Between 1952 and
1974, a Federal grain facility, located on a
portion of the site, was the source of
ground water contamination. From 1955 to
1965, the fumigant 80/20, composed of 80%
carbon tetrachloride and 20% carbon
disulfide, was used onsite on stored grain.
Chloroform is a by-product of carbon
tetrachloride production and may also have
been present onsite. In 1982, contamination
was detected in Public Water Supply Well
(PWS) Numbers 1 and 3. PWS 3 was
removed from service and four additional
wells were installed outside the known area
of contamination. In 1988, EPA began
contaminant treatment at the site by
installing an air stripping system, in
conjunction with ground water pumping
and treatment and soil vapor extraction
systems. The contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including carbon tetrachloride and
chloroform.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes continued operation and
maintenance of the ground water air
stripping system and the soil vapor
extraction system; ground water monitoring
to delineate the magnitude and extent of
contamination; evaluation of the
construction of PWS 3 to explain the
contamination in this well; sampling
existing and new monitoring wells;
development of a ground water flow and
transport model to determine the correct
pumping rate for the existing ground water
extraction well, and investigation of the
potential uses for the treated water
discharged offsite. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is
$3,550,000, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $451,000 for 15 years.
179
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil gas cleanup levels for VOCs will be
reduced to the performance criteria level of
6.5 ug/kg calculated for the site. Soil
levels were below the calculated cleanup
levels of 1.1 mg/kg and 1.7 mg/kg for
carbon tetrachloride and chloroform,
respectively. The treated water discharge
will meet State NPDES permit levels of
5.0 ug/1 for carbon tetrachloride and
3.8 mg/1 for chloroform. Ground water
cleanup levels will meet State MCLs
including carbon tetrachloride 5.0 ug/1
(MCL) and chloroform below 3.8 ug/1
(MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Pesticides; Plume Management; Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW); Safe
Drinking Water Act; Soil; Sole-Source
Aquifer; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria.
WELDON SPRING QUARRY/
PLANT/PITS (USDOE), MO
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 226-acre Weldon Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE) site is a former
ordnance works and chemical plant near
the city of Weldon Spring in St. Charles
County, Missouri. The site is divided into
two noncontiguous areas: a 217-acre
chemical plant area, comprised of various
buildings, ponds and four raffinate pits,
and a 9-acre quarry, which forms a valley
wall at the edge of the Missouri River
floodplain. Since the early 1940s, the site
has been used by various government
agencies for chemical and ordnance
processing with chemical and radioactive
waste disposal in the quarry. From 1941 to
1946, the site was an Army ordnance works
used for the production of trinitrotoluene
(TNT) and dinitrotoluene (DNT) explosives,
and the quarry was used to dispose of the
chemical wastes. From 1955 to 1966 the
Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), the
predecessor to the Department of Energy,
constructed and operated the chemical
plant for processing uranium and thorium.
Types of wastes disposed of onsite
included uranium and thorium ore residues
(drummed and uncontained), radioactively
contaminated building debris, processing
equipment, and residues of TNT and DNT
from cleanup of the former ordnance
works. Except for partially
decontaminating buildings and dismantling
some equipment, the site has not been used
since 1967. In 1990, EPA released a
remedial investigation/feasibility study and
proposed plan, which documented five
remedial actions for the quarry. The first
remedial action involves treating
contaminated surface water, followed by
discharge of treated water to the Missouri
River. The second remedial action, which
is documented in this Record of Decision
(ROD), addresses interim deposition of bulk
wastes in the quarry to minimize future
ground water and air contamination and to
facilitate additional characterization of
waste and residuals in and around the
quarry. Final decisions for disposal of
wastes will be made in a subsequent ROD
for the chemical plant. Future remedial
actions will address materials remaining in
the quarry walls and floor, ground water
contamination, and contaminated properties
outside the quarry. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the
quarry soil, sludge, and debris are organics
including PCBs and PAHs; radioactive
materials; and metals including arsenic and
lead.
The selected interim remedial action for
this site includes excavating an estimated
95,000 cubic yards of chemically and
radioactively contaminated bulk wastes
from the quarry and temporarily storing
the wastes onsite in the chemical plant
area; and implementing site access
restrictions. The estimated total cost for
this remedial action is $11,000,000. There
are no O&M costs associated with this
remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not provided.
180
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
applicable.
Not
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Interim Remedy;
Lead; Metals; Organics; PAHs; PCBs;
Radioactive Materials; Sludge; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Temporary Storage;
Toxic Substances Control Act.
WHEELING DISPOSAL SERVICE, MO
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 200-acre Wheeling Disposal Service site
is an inactive industrial and sanitary
landfill in Amazonia, Missouri. Onsite
disposal features include nine solid waste
trenches, five liquid waste trenches, two
evaporation ponds, a farm chemical area,
three tannery waste areas, and a rinsed-
container area. Surrounding land use is
mixed residential and agricultural. From
1964 until the landfill was closed in 1986,
municipal and industrial wastes, including
tanning sludge, pesticides, asbestos,
laboratory wastes, construction debris, paint
sludge, battery and cyanide waste, and
crushed drums were disposed of in the
various onsite disposal units. EPA and the
State conducted onsite and offsite
investigations from 1980 to 1987 that
identified the presence of onsite
contamination with no evidence of offsite
contaminant migration. The remedial
investigation/feasibility study conducted in
1989 and 1990 confirmed these results.
This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses
both source control and management of
contaminant migration, and is a final
remedy. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, ground
water, and surface water are VOCs
including TCE and toluene; other organics
including pesticides; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes upgrading the existing landfill cap
with a revegetated clay and soil cover;
monitoring onsite ground and surface
water; abandoning onsite wells; and
implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions such as fencing. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action
is $1,205,800, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $42,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Performance criteria for ground water and
surface water will be developed, and may
be based on Federal MCLs or Ambient
Water Quality Criteria, or State water
quality standards. If contaminant levels
exceed these criteria, ground water
treatment and/or leachate collection and
treatment may be required.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
agricultural use of the disposal area.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls; Landfill Closure; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Disposal; Organics; Pesticides; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Sediment; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water;
Surface Water Monitoring; TCE; Toluene;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
WHITE FARM EQUIPMENT DUMP, IA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1990
The 20-acre White Farm Equipment Dump
site is an active landfill near the north
border of Charles City in Floyd County,
Iowa. The site lies within the 100-year
floodplain of the Cedar River in the former
location of a sand and gravel quarry, and
borders farmlands to the west, north and
east with residential areas to the south of
the site. Drainage from the site toward the
northwest and south feeds into adjacent
wetland areas. The Charles City municipal
wells, located 700 feet east of the site,
obtain water from the deep, confined Cedar
Valley aquifer. Additionally, six shallow
drinking water wells that draw from an
uncontrolled water table are 1,000 feet
downgradient from the site. Intermittently
since 1971, approximately 650,000 cubic
yards of wet scrubber sludge, foundry
sands, baghouse dusts, and other industrial
181
-------
wastes were disposed of onsite. In 1984, to
assess the environmental impact of this
disposal, the State required the installation
of four ground water monitoring wells.
Site assessments in 1985 and 1986 revealed
ground water contamination and
documented that elevated metal levels were
present in the shallow alluvial aquifer in
close proximity to the municipal wells.
The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil, debris, and ground water
are VOCs including benzene and toluene;
and metals including arsenic, chromium,
and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes regrading and covering the landfill
with an impermeable layer of topsoil and
vegetation to prevent contaminant
infiltration, leaching, run-off, and erosion;
ground water pumping and treatment by
air stripping followed by onsite discharge
of treated water; controlling air emissions
by carbon adsorption with offsite disposal
of residuals; monitoring metal contaminant
levels and adding a metals treatment train
as needed; ground water monitoring; and
implementing site access restrictions and
institutional controls, including deed
restrictions. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $2,352,121,
which includes an annual O&M cost of
$89,345 for years 1-5 and $35,865 for years
6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The concentration of benzene in ground
water will be reduced and maintained
below 1 ug/1 (State standard).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Well
installation and property use will be
limited by deed restrictions.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct
Contact; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure; Lead; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Sludge;
Soil; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands.
182
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 8
(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming)
EAST HELENA, MT
First Remedial Action
November 22, 1989
The 80-acre East Helena site, in East Helena,
Lewis and Clark County, Montana, is a
primary lead smelting facility that has been in
operation since 1888. In 1927 the Anaconda
Company constructed a plant adjacent to the
lead smelter to recover zinc from the smelter's
waste slag. Asarco, the owner and operator of
the smelter facility, purchased the zinc plant in
1972 and operated the plant until 1982. Prickly
Pear Creek flows near the site and has been
found to contain elevated levels of arsenic and
lead. Air quality and soil investigations also
revealed the presence of contaminated soil in
East Helena residential areas, contaminated
process ponds over shallow ground water near
the plant, and elevated blood-lead levels in
school children. A 1984 remedial investigation
identified elevated levels of metal
contamination in soil, livestock, plants, and
ground and surface waters with the sources of
onsite contamination being primary and
fugitive emissions and seepage from process
ponds and process fluid circuitry. The site has
been segregated into five operable units,
consisting of the process ponds, the ground
water, the surface water, the slag pile, and the
ore storage areas. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses four process fluid ponds
which are used for process water retention and
include the Lower Lake, the speiss granulating
pond and pit, the acid plant water treatment
facility, and the former Thornock Lake, now
dry. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and sediment in the process
ponds are metals including arsenic and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating and smelting 55,150 cubic
yards of soil and/or sediment from all four
process ponds and multi-media monitoring
after individual remedial activities are
implemented at three of the process pond
areas. Process pond remediation activites
include replacing the speiss granulating pond
with a tank and a secondary containment
facility and replacing the pit with a lined
facility; replacing the settling system at the acid
plant water treatment facility with a closed
circuit filtration treatment system; in-situ
co-precipitation of the process wastes from the
Lower Lake, replacing the Lower Lake with
two steel tanks to contain process wastes, and
constructing a lined pond for emergency
containment of storm runoff. If pilot-scale
testing of in-situ co-precipitation proves to be
impractical, a contingency plan will be
implemented, which includes treatment of
Thornock Lake water at an onsite water
treatment facility to remove metals, followed by
discharge to a publicly owned treatment works
(POTW). The estimated present worth ost for
this remedial action is $9,644,500 which
includes an annual O&M cost of $611,200.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil/sediment will be excavated to a level that
will ensure that leachate will not exceed
Federal drinking water standards. The
prescribed standards for Lower Lake process
waters include arsenic 0.02 mg/1, which is
lower than EPA's MCL of 0.05 mg/1, and lead
0.05 mg/1, EPA's MCL. The State water
quality standards for arsenic and lead were
waived on the basis of technical
impracticability.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: ARAR Waiver; Arsenic;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Contingency Remedy; Direct
Contact; Excavation; teachability Tests; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Discharge; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTW); RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Treatment; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology.
MARTIN MARIETTA, DENVER
AEROSPACE, CO
First Remedial Action
September 24, 1990
The 5,200-acre Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace site is in Waterton, Jefferson County,
Colorado. The site completely surrounds 464
acres of contaminated Air Force property,
183
-------
which is being addressed as a separate
Superfund site. Since 1950, the Martin Marietta
Aeronautics Group (MMAG) has been
conducting high technology engineering, design,
development, and manufacturing operations for
the space industry onsite. Types of wastes
generated during onsite activities include oils,
metals, organic solvents, wastewater, chemical
process sludge, and VOCs. From 1959 to 1980,
untreated, highly concentrated waste from
onsite activities was disposed of in five onsite
ponds, referred to as the Inactive Site Ponds
Area. An estimated 2,100 cubic yards of waste
and 24,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil are
contained in the Inactive Site Ponds Area.
From 1957 to 1969, solid wastes and
construction debris generated at the site were
disposed of in an 11-acre landfill known as the
Rifle Range Landfill. In addition, waste was
stored in underground storage tanks in an area
referred to as the Chemical Storgage Area.
Previous site remediations by MMAG from
1969 to 1985 did not address contaminant
sources or migration, but included backfilling
and regrading of the Rifle Range Landfill;
consolidation of soil and wastes from two
onsite disposal ponds into one pond and
covering of the ponds with soil; and operation
of a ground water recovery system. EPA
investigations have identified the Inactive Site
Ponds and the Chemical Storage areas, both
located to the north of the main facility, as the
two major sources of onsite soil and ground
water contamination. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation of onsite
contaminated soil, waste/debris, and ground
water. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil, debris, and ground water are
VOCs including TCE; toluene, and xylenes;
other organics including PCBs, pesticides, and
phenols; and metals including chromium and
lead.
The selected remedial action for this site has
been divided into three separate areas: the
Inactive Site Ponds Area, the Chemical Storage
Area, and the ground water in the south
central portion of the site. Remediation of the
Inactive Site Ponds Area includes dewatering
1.3 million gallons of water from perched water
zones; excavating and incinerating off site 2,100
cubic yards of organic waste/soil material from
in and around the ponds; thermally treating
onsite 24,000 cubic yards of
organic-contaminated soil; solidifying and
stabilizing remaining soil contaminated with
inorganics; backfilling excavated areas with the
treated soil, and covering the ponds area with
a RCRA-multilayer cap. Remediation of the
Chemical Storage Area includes treating
VOC-contaminated soil using in-situ soil vapor
extraction, incinerating, and disposing of offsite
any residual organic-laden sludge from the
thermal extraction treatment system at the
ponds area along with any spent carbon from
the in-situ soil vapor extraction process.
Contaminated ground water remediation
includes onsite pumping and treatment using
air stripping, carbon adsorption, ion exchange,
UV photolysis/oxidation, chemical reduction,
and precipitation, followed by onsite discharge
to surface water; and ground water monitoring.
The present worth cost for this remedial action
is $58,240,000, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $1,231,500 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Both onsite and offsite ground water will be
treated to meet SDWA MCLs or MCLGs.
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup
standards include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
arsenic 50 ug/1 (MCL), chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL), lead 5 ug/1 (MCL), and TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL). Chemical-specific soil cleanup levels
are based on soil action levels and TCLP
treatment standards including toluene
28 mg/kg (TCLP), PCB 1.0 mg/kg (TCLP), and
TCE 0.09 mg/kg (TCLP).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Treatment; Landfill Closure; Lead; MCLGs;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Pesticides;
Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Temporary
Storage; Toluene; Treatment Technology;
Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Xylenes.
MONTICELLO MILL TAILINGS (DOE), UT
First Remedial Action
August 22, 1990
The 300-acre Monticello Mill Tailings site is
comprised of a 78-acre inactive uranium and
vanadium milling operation and affected
184
-------
peripheral properties in Monticello, San Juan
County, Utah. Surrounding land use is rural
residential and agricultural. The site overlies a
shallow alluvial aquifer, and part of the site
lies within the floodplain of Montezuma Creek.
Approximately 18-acres of wetlands adjacent to
Montezuma Creek also have been contaminated
by tailings. In 1940, the site was operated as
a vanadium ore-buying station. Milling of ore
began in 1942, and a vanadium/uranium
sludge product was produced onsite from 1943
to 1944. Onsite uranium milling processes
began in the mid-forties and continued until
1959. Mill tailings from these operations were
disposed of in four onsite tailings piles that are
within the floodplain of the Montezuma Creek.
The mill was permanently closed in 1960, and
the tailings piles were covered and vegetated.
From 1964 to 1965, the entire plant was
dismantled and foundations were partially
buried onsite along with contaminated material.
Onsite and offsite soil contamination is the
result of wind and surface water erosion of the
contaminated tailings piles with subsequent
deposition elsewhere. In 1972, 15,000 cubic
yards of contaminated soil were excavated and
disposed of on the onsite tailings piles. Site
investigations from 1989 to 1990 identified the
presence of onsite and offsite
radioactively-contaminated soil and ground
water, and elevated concentrations of metals
within the tailings piles. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses remediation of two
Operable Units (OUs): the 78-acre Millsite area
(OU1), and the 240-acres of peripheral
properties (OU2). A subsequent ROD will
address remediation of ground water and
surface water once the source areas have been
removed. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and debris are metals
including arsenic, chromium, and lead; and
radioactive materials including radium-266 and
radon.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes dewatering and excavating 1.5 million
cubic yards of tailings, contaminated soil, and
process-related material from the contaminated
tailings piles; consolidating these materials in
an onsite repository that will be built one mile
south of the existing millsite; diverting
Montezuma Creek to allow for the relocation of
mill tailings and contaminated floodplain soil,
excavating 300,000 cubic yards of contaminated
soil from the peripheral properties, followed by
eventual consolidation of the soil within the
repository; backfilling excavated areas with
clean fill; treating surface runoff and
construction/dewatering water collected during
construction using evaporation ponds, reverse
osmosis, or another technology and discharging
the treated water to Montezuma Creek;
disposing of any treatment residuals within the
repository or at an offsite facility; covering the
repository with a clay and multi-media cap;
revegetating the millsite and repository site;
monitoring air, ground water and surface
water; and implementing institutional controls
and site access restrictions. The estimated
capital cost for this remedial action ranges from
$64,787,500 to $70,600,000 (based on the cost of
engineering controls), which includes an annual
O&M cost of $40,846 for 24 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Federal standards for radium-226 are 5 pCi/g
above background in the surface 15 centimeters
of soil, and 15 pCi/g above background level
for radium-226 in the deeper 15 cm thick layer.
Because the background level at the site is
radium-226 1.0 - 0.4 pCi/g, excavation levels
were set at 6 pCi/g for surficial soil, and
16 pCi/g for soil greater than 15 centimeters
deep. The Federal standard of 20 pCi/m2/sec
for radon emissions will also be met.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Air Act; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals;
Mining Wastes; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Radioactive Materials; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; Surface Water Monitoring;
Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
MYSTERY BRIDGE AT HIGHWAY 20, WY
First Remedial Action
September 24, 1990
The Mystery Bridge at Highway 20 site is an
industrial area with two onsite residential
subdivisions, in Natrona County, one mile east
of Evansville, Wyoming. A portion of the site
lies within the 100- and 500-year flood plains of
the North Platte River and Elkhorn Creek.
Two plants are located at the site: the
DOW/DSI facility, an oil and gas production
185
-------
enhancement service facility; and the KN plant,
which is a natural gas fractionation,
compression, cleaning, odorizing and
transmission plant. The site overlies a
contaminated alluvial aquifer, which was
previously used as a source of potable water.
Probable sources of onsite ground water
contamination include contaminant releases
from a DOW/DSI truck wash water system,
which is comprised of an oil/water separator,
a vitreous tile drain, and a leach sump system;
and an onsite toluene storage area. In 1965, an
underground pipe burst, releasing 5,000 to
10,000 gallons of absorption oil from the KN
facility into the soil. From 1965 to 1987, a flare
pit was used by KN to collect spent materials
and wastes, and an onsite catchment area was
used to collect the contaminated surface runoff
and steam condensate from a dehydration unit.
From 1965 to 1987, several small contaminant
releases occurred near the flare pit and
catchment area. In 1987, site investigations
revealed the presence of aromatic hydrocarbons
in the soil in this area. Additionally, ground
water sampling revealed the presence of two
contaminated ground water plumes originating
from the Dow/DSI the BETX plume and KN
(VHO plume) facilities, respectively. The BETX
plume consists of aromatic hydrocarbons
including toluene, and xylenes, while the VHO
plume consists of volatile halogenated organics
and chlorinated organics. From 1988 to 1989,
both DOW/DSI and KN conducted removal
actions, which included remediation of
approximately 440 cubic yards of contaminated
onsite soil using vapor extraction; excavation
and landfilling of contaminated soil and
removal of the separator, a waste oil tank, and
part of the vitreous tile drain at the Dow/DSI
facility; and ground water treatment at the KN
plant. This Record of Decision (ROD)
addresses remediation of the onsite ground
water emanating from the Dow/DSI and KN
facilities; the VHO and BETX plumes,
respectively. Further cleanup of the remaining
source areas will be addressed in a subsequent
ROD. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and treatment of ground
water in the VHO plume followed by air
stripping of ground water in the more
contaminated upgradient portion of the plume,
and natural attenuation in downgradient
portions of the plume; pumping and treatment
of ground water in the BETX plume using air
stripping; reinjecting the treated ground water
from both plumes into the onsite alluvial
aquifer; ground water and air monitoring; and
implementing institutional controls including
deed and ground water use restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $601,739, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $122,914 for 6 years at the VHO
plume, and $50,564 for 1 year at the BETX
plume.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals
are based on Safe Water Drinking Act MCLs
and include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), toluene
2000 ug/1 (proposed MCL), and xylenes
10,000 ug/1 (proposed MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use and deed restrictions will be temporarily
implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
MCLs; O&M; Oils; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; PCE; Plume Management; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria; Xylenes.
OGDEN DEFENSE DEPOT, UT
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1990
The 1,100-acre Ogden Defense Depot site is an
active military facility in Ogden, Weber County,
Utah. Land use in the surrounding area is
mixed residential and commercial. The site
overlies a shallow unconsolidated lacustrine
and alluvial aquifer, which is a potential source
of drinking water. In the past, both liquid and
solid wastes have been disposed of at the site.
Oily liquid materials and combustible solvents
were burned in onsite pits, and solid materials
were buried onsite. In fact, six different
contaminated disposal areas have been
identified and divided into four Operable Units
(OUs) for remediation. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses OU2, which is comprised of
a french drain area, a building used for
pesticide storage (B51), and a parade ground
186
-------
area. From the early 1970s to 1985, the 8.5 by
20-foot french drain area, which is comprised
of a 2.5 to 4-foot deep gravel-filled excavation,
was used as a loading and mixing area for
pesticides and herbicides, and for rinsing the
empty containers. Rinsate from this activity
was allowed to percolate through the french
drain directly into the ground. The onsite
storage building was used to mix and store
pesticides, herbicides, and paint, although no
contamination resulting from B51 activities has
been detected to date. In addition, two onsite
oil and solvent burning pits were previously
utilized on or near the onsite parade ground
area. Site investigations in 1979, 1981, and
from 1985 to 1986, determined that improper
waste disposal practices were used at the site,
and discovered ground water contaminated by
VOCs and pesticides near the french drain area.
Subsequent investigations from 1988 to 1990,
further characterized the ground water
contamination, and also identified onsite soil
contamination, including high pesticide levels
in the french drain area. This ROD addresses
soil at the french drain area and onsite ground
water contamination. Subsequent RODs will
address the remaining three OUs and will
involve continued investigations and possible
remediation of other onsite areas and media,
including buried wastes, a mustard gas storage
area, and the oil burning pit area. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, and TCE; and other organics including
pesticides and herbicides.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 40 cubic
yards of pesticide-contaminated soil from the
french drain area, followed by off site
incineration and disposal at a hazardous waste
treatment facility; backfilling the excavated area
with clean soil and revegetating the area;
pumping and treatment of approximately
28 million gallons of contaminated ground
water using air stripping and liquid phase
carbon adsorption, if contaminants are not
adequately removed in the air stripping
process; reinjecting or infiltrating treated
ground water onsite; and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $676,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $75,000 to
$103,000 for five years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The excavation level for soil has been set at the
lowest consistently detected concentration level
including pesticides/herbicides
(chlordane/bromacil) 1 mg/kg. Ground water
cleanup goals are Federal MCLs and include
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL) and chlordane 2 ug/1
(MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Closure Requirements; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Treatment; MCLs; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE;
Pesticides; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
PORTLAND CEMENT
(KILN DUST #2 & #3), UT
First Remedial Action
July 19, 1990
The 71-acre Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 &
#3) site is in a primarily industrial/comrrlercial
area of Salt Lake City, Utah, and consists of 3
separate but adjacent properties known as Site
2, Site 3, and the West Site. Between 1965 and
1983, the Portland Cement Co., which was
purchased by Lone Star Industries in 1979,
deposited approximately 495,000 cubic yards of
waste cement kiln dust (CKD) on each of the
three properties comprising the site. Waste
CKD consists primarily of heavy metals and
other inorganics and is highly alkaline.
Approximately 360 tons of chromium-bearing
refractory bricks were disposed of with the
waste CKD. Unlike Sites 2 and 3, the waste
CKD at the West Site is mixed with soil and
debris including demolition rubble, scrap iron,
concrete slabs, asphalt, and common and the!
chromium bearing refractory kiln bricks. The
waste CKD has also produced a contaminant
plume which is present in the shallow ground
water beneath the site and some adjacent
properties. This Record of Decision, the first
operable unit, addresses removal of the waste
CKD and temporary onsite storage of the
chromium bricks. A subsequent operable unit
will address any remaining soil and ground
187
-------
water contamination and treatment and
disposal of the chromium bricks. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the waste
CKD are metals including arsenic, chromium,
and lead, and other inorganics.
The selected interim remedial action for this
site includes excavation and offsite disposal of
495,000 cubic yards of waste CKD at a
noncommercial, industrial landfill, which will
be capped; removal of 360 tons of
chromium-bearing refractory kiln bricks from
the waste CKD prior to offsite disposal of the
waste CKD, followed by temporary onsite
storage; ground water monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls
including well construction and deed
restrictions. The estimated present worth cost
for the remedial action is $12,143,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $5,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Offsite disposal of waste CKD will eliminate
fugitive dust emissions from the site thereby
contributing to compliance with Federal and
State air quality standards. Final soil and
ground water cleanup levels will be addressed
in a subsequent operable unit.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Temporary
deed restrictions will be imposed prohibiting
site development that could disturb waste CKD
such that fugitive dust emissions would be
generated. Restrictions will also be imposed to
prohibit the construction of ground water
drinking wells on or adjacent to the site.
KEYWORDS: Air; Arsenic; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Air Act; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water Monitoring; Inorganics; Institutional
Controls; Interim Remedy; Lead; Metals; Offsite
Disposal; O&M; RCRA; State
Standards/Regulations; Temporary Storage.
ROCKY FLATS PLANT (DOE), CO
First Remedial Action
January 5, 1990
The 6,550-acre Rocky Hats Plant (DOE) site is
a federal facility, which serves as a nuclear
weapons research development and production
complex in Jefferson County, Colorado.
Surrounding land use is primarily rural
residential, although there are some industrial
properties nearby. The site overlies an
alluvial/colluvial aquifer, and a small wetlands
area is present within the facility boundaries.
Since 1951, onsite operations have included the
manufacture of nuclear weapons components
from plutonium, uranium, beryllium, and
stainless steel. There are twelve sites,
designated as solid waste management units,
which comprise the 881 Hillside area. In 1987,
EPA identified VOC-contaminated ground
water in the 881 Hillside area located in the
southeast corner of the site near a surface
stream. Possible sources for this contamination
included chemical and oil waste pits, fuel oil
tanks, and an associated drum storage area,
onsite sol vent/oil spills and leaks, and sanitary
sewer overflow discharge. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses management of
migration and cleanup of ground water in the
881 Hillside area, and is an interim remedy.
Final remediation of this site will be addressed
in a subsequent ROD. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including PCE and TCE;
metals including chromium; and radioactive
materials.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes intercepting contaminated ground
water in the alluvial/colluvial aquifer using a
french drain system; treating the contaminated
water in an onsite treatment plant using
filtration followed by UV peroxide to remove
organics, and ion exchange to remove
inorganics; storing the treated water
temporarily onsite during effluent quality
testing prior to discharging the treated water to
an onsite interceptor ditch; and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $4,588,200, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $258,100 for
30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup standards will be the
more stringent of Federal MCLs or MCLGs, or
State water quality standards. Chemical-specific
goals include PCE 5 ug/1 (State), TCE 5 ug/1
(State), trivalent chromium 0.05 mg/1 (State),
and chromium 0.05 mg/1 (State).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Direct Contact; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy; MCLGs; MCLs;
188
-------
Metals; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; PCE; Plume Management;
Radioactive Materials; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Temporary Storage; VOCs; Wetlands.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
(OPERABLE UNIT 16), CO
Second Remedial Action
February 26, 1990
The Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 16) comprises part of the 17,000-acre RMA
site, which is a former U.S. Army chemical
warfare and incendiary munitions
manufacturing and assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado. From the 1950s until late
1969, the U.S. Army used the RMA facility to
produce the nerve agent GB (isopropyl
methyl-phosphonofluoridate). From 1947 to
1982, private industries leased major portions of
the plant facilities to manufacture various
insecticides and herbicides. Since 1970, facility
operations primarily have involved the
destruction of chemical warfare materials.
Because final remediation of the RMA site will
take many years to complete, thirteen Interim
Response Actions (IRAs) were determined
necessary prior to implementing the final
On-Post Record of Decision (ROD). Operable
Unit 16 (M-l Settling Basins area) is one of
several areas being addressed as part of the
Other Contamination Sources IRA. The M-l
Settling Basins area occupies 84,500 square feet
and consists of three unlined basins used to
treat waste fluids from the lewisite facility.
The basins also may have received lesser
amounts of waste materials including mercuric
chloride from alleged spills within several
onsite buildings. The basins have been
backfilled and are partly covered with soil or
structures. Site investigations by the Army
revealed that the waste material in the basins
is a source of arsenic contamination in ground
water. This ROD addresses interim
remediation of source areas and management
of contaminant migration. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sludge, and ground water are organics
including pesticides, and metals including
arsenic.
The selected Interim Response Action for this
interim remedy includes sampling and
relocating tanks from the basin area to an
adjacent area to await a final disposition in the
final On-Post ROD; constructing a temporary
360-degree subsurface barrier such as a slurry
wall or sheet pilings around the basins;
performing an in-situ vitrification demonstration
test; treating approximately 2,600 cubic yards of
soil and 6,400 cubic yards of sludge using
in-situ vitrification followed by carbon
adsorption to treat off-gasses; treating the
recovered water driven from the sludge during
the vitrification process onsite at the CERCLA
Wastewater Treatment System or by another
method to be determined during remedial
design; and conducting ground water and air
monitoring. The vitrified soil will remain
onsite, pending determination of a final
remedial action in the final On-Post ROD. No
costs were provided for this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The treatment process will be constructed to
provide 99.99% destruction and removal of
organics. Treatment standards for effluent from
the offgas control process and other liquids
generated through dewatering of the area are
contained in the ROD for the CERCLA
Wastewater Treatment System IRA. Air
emissions from the vitrification process will
comply with applicable Clean Air Act emission
standards.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Clean Air Act; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Interim
Remedy; Metals; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
Pesticides; Sludge; Slurry Wall; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Temporary Storage;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
Vitrification.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
(OPERABLE UNIT 17), CO
Eighth Remedial Action
May 14, 1990
The Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 17) is a part of the 17,000-acre RMA site,
which is a former U.S. Army chemical warfare
and incendiary munitions manufacturing and
assembly plant in Adams County, Colorado.
From the 1950s until late 1969, the U.S. Army
used the RMA facility to produce the nerve
agent GB (isopropylmethylphosphonofluoridate).
In addition, between 1947 and 1982, private
industries leased major portions of the plant
189
-------
facilities to manufacture various insecticides
and herbicides. Since 1970, facility operations
have primarily involved the destruction of
chemical warfare materials. Because final
remediation of the RMA site will take many
years to complete, thirteen Interim Response
Actions (IRAs) were determined necessary prior
to implementing the final remedial action.
Operable Unit 17 (CERCLA Wastewater
Treatment System) is among those IRAs
specified. This ROD addresses the interim
remedy to develop and implement a program
to treat contaminated wastewaters resulting
from the assessment and implementation of
response actions at the RMA site. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the
wastewaters are VOCs including benzene, PCE,
toluene, and TCE; other organics including
pesticides; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected Interim Response Action for this
interim remedy includes constructing a
centrally located wastewater treatment facility
that will consist of a sequence of unit processes
including chemical addition/precipitation,
filtration, ultraviolet light/chemical oxidation,
activated carbon adsorption, air stripping, and
an activated alumina treatment process;
constructing decontamination pads at both the
treatment facility and satellite non-treatment
wastewater facilities; constructing five storage
tanks with 10,000 to 12,000 gallon capacities;
and incorporating offsite discharge of the
treated effluent to the sanitary sewer and
offsite disposal of treatment facility sludge and
residuals. No costs were provided for this
remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ARARs, based on Colorado
Basic Standards for Ground Water (CBSG) and
State MCLs, will be applied to the design of
the treatment system and include arsenic
50 ug/1 (MCL), benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL), lead 50 ug/1 (MCL),
PCE 10 ug/1 (CBSG), toluene 2,420 ug/1
(CBSG), and TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Water Act;
Decontamination; Interim Remedy; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; Offsite Discharge; Offsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE; Pesticides;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sludge; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
(OPERABLE UNIT 18), CO
Third Remedial Action
February 26, 1990
The Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 18) site comprises part of the 17,000-acre
RMA site, which is a former U.S. Army
chemical warfare and incendiary munitions
manufacturing and assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado. From the 1950s until late
1969, the U.S. Army used the RMA facility to
produce the nerve agent GB (isopropyl methyl-
phosphonofluoridate). In addition, between
1947 and 1982, private industries leased major
portions of the plant facilities to manufacture
various insecticides and herbicides. Since 1970,
facility operations primarily have involved the
destruction of chemical warfare materials.
Because final remediation of the RMA site will
take many years to complete, thirteen Interim
Response Actions (IRAs) were determined
necessary prior to implementing the Final
On-post Record of Decision (ROD). Operable
Unit 18 (Motor Pool Area) is one of several
areas included in the Other Contamination
Sources IRA. The U.S. Army acquired the
motor pool area in 1942, and used it for storing
diesel fuel, gasoline, road oil, and flammable
liquids in an above-ground storage tank farm.
In addition, during the early 1950s, several
buildings were used for pesticide and herbicide
storage, and later these buildings housed an
agricultural research and bioassay laboratory.
The Army continues to use the area to service
equipment, vehicles, and railroad cars. A
diesel fuel spill and other spills related to
piping from underground tanks have been
recorded. In 1985, ground water monitoring
identified TCE contamination near the motor
pool area and in downgradient water supply
wells. Records indicate that vehicle
maintenance operations involved discharging
water and other liquids, and rust residues
through floor drains and pipes into unlined
ditches. This ROD addresses interim
remediation of source areas and management of
migration. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs, including benzene and TCE.
190
-------
The selected Interim Response Action for this
interim remedy includes conducting a vapor
extraction pilot test; installing and operating an
in-situ vapor extraction system, followed by
granular activated carbon treatment of
condensed water vapor with offsite thermal
carbon reactivation; capping the site with a
layer of asphalt to improve the efficiency of the
vapor extraction system; conducting air
monitoring, followed by possible stack
treatment by a vapor phase carbon filter or
catalytic oxidizer; and ground water pumping,
treatment, and reinjection in conjunction with
the Rail Classification Yard IRA. No costs
were provided for this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No chemical-specific goals were identified for
soil contaminants. Chemical-specific goals for
ground water treatment, which apply at the
point of injection, are contained in the ROD for
the Rail Classification Yard IRA and include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Benzene;
Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act;
Ground Water; Ground Water Treatment;
Interim Remedy; MCLs; Offsite Treatment;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Soil; TCE; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
(OPERABLE UNIT 19), CO
Fourth Remedial Action
February 26, 1990
The Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) (Operable
Unit 19) site comprises part of the 17,000-acre
RMA site, which is a former U.S. Army
chemical warfare and incendiary munitions
manufacturing and assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado. From the 1950s until late
1969, the U.S. Army used the RMA facility to
produce the nerve agent GB
(isopropylmethyl-phosphonofluoridate). In
addition, between 1947 and 1982, private
industries leased major portions of the plant
facilities to manufacture various insecticides
and herbicides. Since 1970, facility operations
primarily have involved the destruction of
chemical warfare materials. Because final
remediation of the RMA site will take many
years to complete, thirteen Other Contamination
Sources Interim Response Actions (IRAs) were
determined necessary prior to implementing the
Final Onpost Record of Decision (ROD).
Operable Unit 19 (Rail Classification Yard) is
one of the areas included in the IRAs. In 1980,
the pesticide l,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
(DBCP) was detected in the alluvial ground
water near the Rail Classification Yard or RMA.
To prevent off-post migration of DBCP in the
ground water, the Irondale Control System
(ICS) was installed in the Rail Classification
yard in 1981. This system, which has been
effective in preventing off-post migration,
involves pumping and treatment of
contaminated ground water followed by
reinjection. Site investigations by the U.S.
Army indicate DBCP contamination in
unsaturated soil and sediment, possibly from
leaking rail cars, to be potential sources of
ground water contamination. This ROD
addresses interim management of migration of
the contaminated ground water plume. The
primary contaminant of concern affecting the
ground water is DBCP.
The selected interim remedial action for this
site includes installing a ground water
interception/containment system parallel to the
contaminant flowpath; increasing the treatment
capacity of the ICS and constructing pipelines
to convey extracted ground water to the ICS;
ground water pumping and treatment using
carbon adsorption at the ICS followed by
reinjection; and conducting ground water
monitoring. This interim remedial action will
be implemented jointly with the RMA motor
pool area IRA. The estimated present worth
cost of this interim remedial action is
$2,662,000, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $183,000 for 5 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The chemical-specific goal for ground water
treatment of DBCP is 0.2 ug/1 based on the
proposed MCL. Chemical-specific goals for
other potential contaminants are based on
MCLs and Colorado Basic Standards for
Ground Water (CBSG) and include benzene
5 ug/1 (MCL), toluene 2,420 ug/1 (CBSG), and
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
191
-------
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds: Ground Water;
Ground-Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy; MCLs; O&M;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
Pesticides; Plume Management; Safe Drinking
Water Act.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
(OPERABLE UNIT 20), CO
Fifth Remedial Action
March 20, 1990
The 17,000-acre Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(Operable Unit 20) site is a former U.S. Army
chemical warfare and incendiary munitions
manufacturing and assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado. From the 1950s until late
1969, the U.S. Army used the RMA facility to
produce the nerve agent GB (isopropyl-
methylphosphonofluoridate). From 1947 to
1982, private industries leased major portions of
the plant facilities to manufacture various
insecticides and herbicides. Since 1970, facility
operations primarily have involved the
destruction of chemical warfare materials.
Because final remediation of the RMA site will
take many years to complete, thirteen Interim
Response Actions (IRAs) were determined
necessary prior to implementing the final
On-Post Record of Decision (ROD). Operable
Unit 20 (OU20), the Lime Settling Basins area,
is one of several areas being addressed as part
of the Other Contaminated Sources IRA. The
unlined Lime Settling Basins occupy
approximately 5 acres, and were used in the
1940s and 1950s to treat chemical production
wastewater using a precipitation process to
remove metals and to accept wastewater from
pesticide production. The wastewater discharge
produced lime sludge contaminated with metals
and pesticides within the basins. Sludge also
was removed from the basins for drying in an
adjacent area. Investigations by the Army in
1987 and 1989 have characterized the nature
and extent of contamination at the Lime
Settling Basins Area. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sludge, and ground water are organics
including pesticides; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected Interim Response Action for this
site includes consolidating 26,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sludge located adjacent to the
basins with 80,000 cubic yards of sludge
located in the basins, and containing the sludge
and any excavated contaminated soil with a
vegetative soil cover; hydraulically containing
ground water with a slurry wall or sheet
pilings constructed around the perimeter of the
basin area; pumping ground water to maintain
an inward hydraulic gradient across the slurry
wall; treating ground water onsite, either at the
CERCLA Wastewater Treatment System or at a
separate onsite treatment facility to remove
organic and inorganic contaminants; and
ground water monitoring. No cost information
was provided for this interim remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific ARARs for ground water
treatment will be contained in the ROD for the
CERCLA Wastewater Treatment System IRA.
No chemical-specific ARARs were given for soil
or sludge.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act-
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Interim
Remedy; Lead; Metals; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treament; Organics;
Pesticides; Plume Management; Sludge; Slurry
Wall; Soil; State Standards/Regulations.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
(OPERABLE UNIT 22), CO
Sixth Remedial Action
May 3, 1990
The 17,000-acre Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA)
(Operable Unit 22) site is a former U.S. Army
chemical warfare and incendiary munitions
manufacturing and assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado. From the 1950s to late 1969,
the U.S. Army used the RMA facility to
produce the nerve agent GB
(isopropylmethylphosphonofluoridate). In
addition, from 1947 to 1982, private industries
leased major portions of the plant facilities to
manufacture various insecticides and herbicides.
Since 1970, U.S. Army facility operations have
primarily involved the destruction of chemical
warfare materials. Because final remediation of
the RMA site will take many years to complete,
thirteen interim response actions (IRAs) were
determined necessary prior to implementing the
final On-Post Record of Decision (ROD).
Operable Unit 22 (OU22), the Complex Disposal
192
-------
Trenches, is one of several areas being
addressed as part of the Other Contaminated
Sources Interim Remedial Action. These
disposal trenches are located in the 107-acre
Site 36-17N in the center of the RMA. During
the 1940s and 1950s, this area was the primary
disposal area for solid chemical waste,
contaminated tools and equipment, rejected
incendiaries, and empty munitions casings.
This waste was decontaminated, placed in
onsite pits, and burned using fuel oil to ensure
complete decontamination. Salvageable
materials such as metal were sold as scrap after
burning, and nonsalvageable materials were
buried in onsite pits. Investigations by RMA in
1988 and 1989, identified onsite contaminated
soil and a variety of buried waste, including
scrap metal, concrete rubble, wood, charcoal,
drums of waste chemicals, and glass vials
containing unknown liquids. Ground water
under the site also was determined to be
contaminated. The main source area for the
contaminant plume, however, appears to be
from upgradient trenches located south of Site
36-17N. Ground water contaminant sources are
the subject of another ROD. The selected
interim remedial action is designed to prevent
taking measures that may be incompatible with
final decisions. Therefore, this ROD will not
address the primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water.
Remediation of contaminated media will be a
component of the final site remedy.
The selected interim remedial action for this
site is no further action with the installation of
ground water wells for further site
characterization; and ground water monitoring.
A reevaluation procedure will identify the need
for any additional onsite remedial actions. No
costs were provided for this interim remedial
action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Ground Water Monitoring;
Interim Remedy; No Action Remedy.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL
(OPERABLE UNIT 23), CO
Seventh Remedial Action
May 3, 1990
The 17,000-acre Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA)
(Operable Unit 23) site is a former U.S. Army
chemical warfare and incendiary munitions
manufacturing and assembly plant in Adams
County, Colorado. From the 1950s to late 1969,
the U.S. Army used the RMA facility to
produce the nerve agent GB (isopropyl-
methylphosphonofluoridate). From 1974 to
1982, private industries leased major portions of
the plant facilities to manufacture various
insecticides and herbicides. Since 1970, the U.S.
Army facility operations primarily have
involved the destruction of chemical warfare
materials. Because final remediation of the
RMA site will take many years to complete,
thirteen Interim Response Actions (IRAs) were
determined to be necessary prior to
implementing the final On-Post Record of
Decision (ROD). Operable Unit 23 (OU23), the
Shell Section 36 Trenches, is one of several
areas being addressed as part of the Other
Contaminated Sources Interim Remedial Action.
Approximately 31 trenches occupy an 8-acre
area of Section 36 in the central portion of the
RMA. From 1952 to 1965, liquid and solid
waste including bulk or drummed process
intermediates, off-specification product,
laboratory sample filters, and other debris from
the manufacture of pesticides was disposed of
and buried in the trenches. Investigations by
the Army from 1987 through 1989 have
identified ground water contamination in a
surficial unconsolidated sand aquifer underlying
the site. A plume of dense non-aqueous phase
liquids (DNAPLs) was also detected, and is
believed to have originated from the Shell
Section 36 trenches. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil and ground water
are VOCs; and other organics including
pesticides.
The selected Interim Response Action for this
Operable Unit includes constructing a
subsurface barrier around the perimeter of the
site, such as a grout curtain tied into an
impermeable clay layer located beneath the
sand aquifer to effectively contain ground water
and DNAPLs; covering the trench area with a
vegetative soil cover to reduce precipitation
infiltration; and investigating further the
DNAPL plume, which is located downgradient
193
-------
of the trench area. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $1,500,000.
O&M costs were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not provided.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Ground Water; Interim Remedy; Onsite
Containment; Organics; Pesticides; Plume
Management; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
VOCs.
SAND CREEK INDUSTRIAL, CO
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The Sand Creek Industrial site is chemical
manufacturing facility in Commerce City,
Adams County, Colorado. Land use in the
area surrounding the site is primarily industrial
and residential with 13 residents onsite.
Production wells north and downgradient of
the site supply drinking water to the county.
The Sand Creek Industrial site lies in the
vicinity of three other Superfund sites:
Woodbury Chemical, Chemical Sales, and
Rocky Mountain Arsenal. Beginning in the
1960s, the Colorado Organic Chemical
Company (COO conducted pesticide
manufacturing operations onsite. Disposal and
onsite storage areas include a landfill and acid
pits. Onsite fires in 1968 and 1977, as well as
improper pesticide storage practices, resulted in
pesticide-contaminated soil, ground water, and
surface water. In 1978, COC removed some
contaminated soil, and in 1984, COC removed
drummed wastes, excess product, additional
contaminated soil, and implemented site access
restrictions including fencing. The site has
been divided into six Operable Units (OU) to
facilitate remediation. A 1989 Record of
Decision (ROD) addressed OU1, which included
remediating some of the subsurface soil. This
second ROD addresses OU5, and includes the
final response action for the 14,000 cubic yards
of contaminated soil present onsite at the COC
area. Subsequent RODs will address the
remaining contamination including the landfill,
acid pits, and ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
organics including pesticides; and metals
including arsenic and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating approximately 14,000 cubic
yards of surface soil above the health-based
action levels, treating the soil onsite using soil
washing and subsequently backfilling the
treated soil onsite; grading and revegetating the
site; incinerating the soil washing wastewater
offsite; and ground water monitoring. The
estimated present worth cost for this selected
remedial action is $4,490,734, which includes an
estimated annual O&M cost of $20,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Remediation goals are based on health-based
action levels or RCRA treatabiliry variance
action levels, whichever is more stringent.
Health-based action levels were established for
soil based on a 10* cancer risk and include
dieldrin 0.155 mg/kg and heptachlor
0.553 mg/kg. Treatability variance action levels
were established for arsenic (90-99% reduction),
chromium 0.5-0.6 mg/1 (TCLP), chlordane
(90-99% reduction), 2,4-D (90-99% reduction),
and 4,4-DDT 0.5-20 mg/1 (Total Waste
Analysis).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium;) Closure Requirements;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground Water
Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; Pesticides; RCRA; Soil; Soil
Washing/Flushing; State Standards/Regulations;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
SHARON STEEL (MIDVALE TAILINGS), UT
First Remedial Action
September 24, 1990
The Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings) site is a
former ore milling operation facility in Midvale,
Utah. Land use in the area is residential,
urban, agricultural, and commercial. Onsite
and offsite features include a mill site, a
tailings area, and an offsite residential
community that relies on drinking water supply
wells located within a three mile radius of the
site. From 1906 to 1971, the facility was
operated as a custom mill, receiving ore from
many sources, then concentrating and extracting
a variety of metals. Tailings from these
operations were deposited into onsite
194
-------
uncovered tailings piles, which have an
estimated volume of 14,000,000 cubic yards.
Previous investigations by the State in 1982
identified elevated levels of metals within the
tailings piles. It is estimated that over 242,000
cubic yards of soil in the residential community
were contaminated by wind-blown tailings from
the onsite pile at the mill site area. In
addition, investigations have identified that the
shallow aquifer directly under the mill site also
is contaminated. This Record of Decision
(ROD) addresses remediation of offsite soil in
the residential areas. A future ROD will
address contaminant source and ground water
remediation. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil are metals including
arsenic, cadmium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavating 242,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil with lead levels greater than
500 mg/kg and arsenic levels greater than
70 mg/kg to a maximum depth of 2 feet,
followed by temporarily disposing of the soil
onsite for future treatment with the onsite
tailings; filling and revegetating excavated
areas; temporarily relocating residents as
necessary; and indoor cleaning if required. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $22,650,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $72,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil contaminated with concentrations greater
then the action levels of lead 500 ug/kg and
arsenic 70 mg/kg will be excavated and
disposed of onsite.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: A building
permit must be obtained for future construction
including removal or replacement of pavement
or foundations. This requirement will be
imposed to reduce the level of contaminant
exposure. A "citizens repository" may be
created to provide a place for residents to
dispose of soil during these future activities.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Disposal; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; Temporary
Storage.
SILVER BOW CREEK, MT
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The Silver Bow Creek site is a mining and
processing area in the Upper Clark Fork River
Basin, Deer Lodge County, Southwestern
Montana. This Record of Decision (ROD)
documents the selected interim remedial action
for one of eleven operable units for the site, the
Warm Springs Ponds operable unit, which
covers approximately 2,500 acres just above the
beginning of the Clark Fork River. Several
onsite creeks (e.g., Warm Springs, Silver Bow,
Mill, Willow) and a stream bypass (Mill-Willow
Bypass) serve as principal headwaters to Clark
Fork River. Three settling ponds (i.e., Warm
Springs Ponds), an area between the northern
most pond and the Clark Fork River's
beginning point, and a series of wildlife ponds
are located in close proximity to the streams.
Contamination at the site is the result of over
100 years of mining and process operations in
the area. Mining, milling, and smelting wastes
were dumped directly into Silver Bow Creek
and transported downstream to the Clark Fork
River with final deposition downstream as far
as 130 miles. The three settling ponds, which
cover over four square miles, were built to
allow the wastes from mining, milling, and
smelting operations that were deposited in
Silver Bow Creek to settle out before discharge
to the Clark Fork River. An estimated 19
million cubic yards of tailings and heavy
metal-contaminated sediment and sludge have
collected in the ponds. An estimated 3 million
cubic yards of contaminated tailings remain
upstream of the ponds, along the banks of
Silver Bow Creek. Principal threats from the
site include the possibility of pond berm failure
due to flood and earthquake damage that could
release millions of cubic yards of tailings and
sediment to the river. Furthermore, the creeks
are contaminated with dissolved metals, and
exposed soil and tailings are contaminated with
elevated levels of several metals. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, ground water, and surface water are
metals including arsenic, cadmium, copper,
lead, and zinc.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes raising and strengthening all pond
berms; increasing the capacity of settling Pond
3 to receive and treat (using metals
precipitation) flows up to a 100-year flood
level, and constructing new inlet and hydraulic
195
-------
structures to prevent debris from plugging the
settling Pond 3 inlet; upgrading the treatment
capability of Ponds 2 and 3 to treat all flows
up to the 100-year peak discharge, and
constructing spillways for routing excess flood
water into the bypass channel; flooding
(wet-closure) all dry portions of settling Pond
2; reconstructing the Mill-Willow Bypass
channel, and removing all remaining tailings
and contaminated soil from the bypass,
followed by consolidating these with dry
tailings and contaminated soil within the dry
portion of settling Pond 1 and settling Pond 3,
capping and revegetating the closure areas;
dewatering wet portions of settling Pond 1,
covering the area with a RCRA-type cap and
revegetating; constructing interception trenches
to collect contaminated ground water in and
below settling Pond 1, then pumping the water
to settling Pond 3 for treatment; establishing
surface and ground water quality monitoring
systems; and implementing institutional controls
and site restrictions. Decisions concerning
remediation of contaminated soil, tailings and
ground water in the area below settling Pond
1 will be made within one year, pending
evaluation of various wet- and dry-closure
alternatives and public review. Until these
decisions are made, soil cleanup levels cannot
be determined. Three chemical- and
location-specific ARARs pertaining to water
quality standards and potential solid waste
disposal requirements will be waived in this
remedy. The present worth cost for this
remedial action is $57,416,000 which includes
an estimated annual O&M cost of $379,000 for
5 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All exposed tailings and contaminated soil in
the Mill-Willow Bypass have already been
removed and placed in the closure area behind
the settling Pond 3 berm. Final soil cleanup
levels will be set within one year of this ROD.
Ground water pumping and discharge for
treatment in the pond system will comply with
State standards, with the exception of arsenic
(0.02 mg/1) and lead (0.05 mg/1). State surface
water concentrations of arsenic and mercury
require an ARAR waiver based on technical
impracticability and the fact that this is an
interim remedy. The replacement criteria are
arsenic 0.02 mg/1 and mercury 0.0002 mg/1 at
the beginning of the river.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Restrictions will
be enacted to prevent residential development,
swimming, and human consumption of fish
from the site.
KEYWORDS: ARAR Waiver; Arsenic;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act; Closure Requirements;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Interim
Remedy; Lead; MCLs; Metals; Mining Wastes;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
WfflTEWOOD CREEK, SD
First Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1990
The Whitewood Creek site is a mine tailings
deposit area near the town of Whitewood in
Lawrence, Mead, and Butte counties, South
Dakota. Situated along 18 miles of Whitewood
Creek, the 2,018-acre site consists of woodlands,
farmland, and residential homes. From 1877 to
1977, arsenic-rich tailings from gold and ore
mining and milling operations, conducted by
the Homestake Mining Company, were
discharged directly into Whitewood Creek. The
tailings, which consist of finely ground rock,
residual metallic and non-metallic compounds
not extracted from the ore, and trace
compounds used during the extraction process,
were deposited downstream from the mine.
The largest tailings deposits at the site are
found along the floodplains of Whitewood
Creek and the Belle Fouche and Cheyenne
Rivers. Since 1977, however, material from the
ore milling process has been treated prior to
backfilling residual material into the mine, and
process water also has been treated prior to
discharge into Whitewood Creek. The tailings
are the major source of contamination at the
site affecting onsite soil in residential areas and
continue to leach metals to surface and
subsurface waters. A 1989 remedial
investigation revealed that some residential
properties contain arsenic levels that presented
health risks. Soil in the residential areas
contain arsenic contamination as a result of a
building in the tailings area, windblown
196
-------
tailings, and the use of arsenic-contaminated
soil as a soil conditioner and a driveway base.
Approximately 12 residences are estimated to
have arsenic-contaminated soil exceeding
100 mg/kg. The total number of affected
residences, however, will be determined during
the remedial design phase. This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses the
arsenic-contaminated soil in the residential
areas. The primary contaminant of concern
affecting the soil is arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes removing and/or covering frequently
used areas with clean surface soil (arsenic
<20 mg/kg) in residential areas with arsenic
levels above 100 mg/kg followed by offsite
disposal of the arsenic-contaminated soil, if
approved by EPA, and revegetation of the
remediated area; soil sampling at all remediated
areas to confirm that arsenic levels are below
100 mg/kg; implementing institutional controls
including land access restrictions; conducting an
annual education program to inform site
residents of the potential health hazards
associated with exposure to tailings, soil, and
downgradient ground water; refining
knowledge of the extent of the contamination
and delineating the 100-year floodplain of
Whitewood Creek; and surface water
monitoring. EPA is invoking ARAR waivers
based on the technical impracticability of
remediating contaminated ground and surface
waters. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $882,813, which includes
an annual O&M cost of $12,000 for years 1-5
and $6,000 for years 6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminated surface soil in frequently used
residential areas will be excavated if arsenic
levels exceed 100 mg/kg (based on 104 target
risk level).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land use
restrictions will be implemented. Ground
water well installation restrictions have already
been implemented and will continue to be
enforced.
KEYWORDS: ARAR Waiver; Arsenic;
Background Levels; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Institutional Controls;
MCLs; Metals; Mining Wastes; Offsite Disposal;
O&M; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; Water Quality Criteria.
197
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 9
(American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam,
Hawaii, Nevada, Trust Territories)
APPLIED MATERIALS, CA
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The 9-acre Applied Materials site is an active
equipment manufacturing facility in Santa
Clara, Santa Clara County, California. The site
is located within the San Tomas Aquino
floodplain, and land use in the area is
primarily light industrial, commercial, and
residential. Shallow ground water at the site
is a potential drinking water source. Onsite
operations include manufacturing vapor
deposition equipment for use by the
semiconductor industry. In 1983, Applied
Materials discovered that several leaks and/or
spills from three onsite underground tanks near
Building 1 had contaminated onsite soil and
shallow ground water with VOCs and other
organics. In 1984 and 1985, as part of interim
onsite cleanup activities, Applied Materials
excavated and removed underground tanks,
piping, and more than 60 cubic yards of
contaminated onsite soil, and installed an air
stripping unit onsite to treat VOC-contaminated
ground water. This Record of Decision (ROD)
provides a final remedy for contaminated onsite
ground water at the Building 1 area.
Remediation of onsite contaminated soil will be
addressed in a subsequent ROD. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including PCE, TCE, and
1,1,1-TCA.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes onsite pumping and treatment of
contaminated ground water using an existing
air stripping unit, followed by onsite discharge
of the treated water to surface water; ground
water monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $715,000. No O&M costs
were provided for this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels will meet State
and Federal Drinking Water MCLs and include
PCE 0.005 ug/1 (MCL), TCE 0.005 ug/1 (MCL),
and 1,1,1-TCA 0.0032 ug/1 (MCL). It is
estimated that the time needed to restore
ground water to beneficial use will be 50 years.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be implemented to limit site
activities and ground water use until safe
drinking water levels are achieved.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; O&M;
Onsite Discharge; PCE; Plume Management;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
COALINGA ASBESTOS MINE, CA
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 21, 1990
The 557-acre Coalinga Asbestos Mine site, a
former asbestos processing area and chromite
mine, comprises part of the Johns Manville
Coalinga Asbestos Mill site in western Fresno
County, California. This rural mountainous
area is used primarily for recreational purposes.
From 1962 to 1974, asbestos ore from several
local mines was processed and sorted onsite,
and the resulting asbestos mill tailings were
periodically bulldozed into an intermittent
stream channel. Subsequently, from 1975 to
1977, a chromite milling operation was
conducted onsite. Tailings were often washed
downstream during periods of stream flow, and
the resuspension of asbestos fibers from the
tailings into the air produced a significant
inhalation hazard. As a result of these
activities, approximately 450,000 cubic yards of
mill tailings and asbestos ore remain onsite
within a large tailing pile. Other site features
include an asbestos ore storage/loading area,
an abandoned mill building, an inactive
chromite mine, filled-in chromite settling ponds,
and debris. In 1980 and 1987, State
investigations indicated that the site was
contributing a significant amount of asbestos
into the surface water. This site will be
remediated as two Operable Units (OU). This
198
-------
Record of Decision (ROD) addresses the
remedial action for OU2, the Johns Manville
Coalinga Asbestos Mill Area. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the surface
water is asbestos.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes consolidating contaminated soil and
asbestos ores within the tailing pile; grading
and revegetating the tailing pile to reduce
erosion and increase stability; diverting surface
water away from the tailing pile; improving an
existing sediment trapping dam by constructing
a concrete spillway; dismantling the mill
building; paving the mill access road; and
implementing engineering controls, institutional
controls including deed restrictions, and site
access restrictions such as fencing. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,947,000, which includes a total
O&M cost of $815,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS: A
specific cleanup level for asbestos was not
determined due to uncertainties in sampling
parameters; however, the selected remedial
action will reduce the excess lifetime cancer
risk to the level of 104 to 10*.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented at the site.
KEYWORDS: Air; Asbestos; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Inorganics; Institutional Controls;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal;
Public Exposure; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; Surface Water Monitoring.
INTEL (SANTA CLARA III), CA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 20, 1990
The Intel (Santa Clara III) site includes a plant
that performs quality control testing of
chemicals and electrical testing of
semiconductors in Santa Clara, Santa Clara
County, California. The site is in a
predominantly industrial area, and overlies a
major ground regional source of ground water,
the Santa Clara Valley ground water basin. In
1982, the State conducted a leak detection
program, which identified VOC contamination
in an onsite shallow aquifer. Possible sources
for the contamination may include the
accidental dumping of solvents into an acid
neutralization tank, accidental spills near an
above-ground solvent storage facility, and
cleaning of solvent-contaminated pipes during
plant construction. It has been determined that
no onsite source is presently contributing to
ground water contamination. Since 1985, Intel
has been pumping and treating ground water
using granular activated carbon as an Initial
Remedial Measure (IRM). This Record of
Decision (ROD) addresses a final solution for
restoring ground water to its beneficial use.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes installing an additional extraction well
onsite; continuing the pumping and treatment
of ground water using an existing granular
activated carbon adsorption system, with
regeneration of carbon filters offsite;
discharging treated water to onsite surface
water; conducting a treatability study to
evaluate the effectiveness of pulsed pumping
techniques that enhance the removal of
contaminants adsorbed to soil and allow for
aquifer equilibration; ground water monitoring;
and implementing institutional controls,
including deed restrictions to limit ground
water use. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $594,400. O&M costs
were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup goals will reduce the
excess lifetime cancer risk for carcinogens from
10"4 to 10"*, and will reduce the Hazard Index
(HI) for non-carcinogens to a value of 1 or less.
Chemical-specific goals include TCE 5 ug/1
(State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and
ground water use restrictions will be
implemented until safe drinking water levels
are achieved.
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Initial Remedial
Measure (IRM); Institutional Controls; MCLs;
O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatability
Studies; VOCs.
199
-------
INTERSIL, CA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 12-acre Intersil site contains two industrial
properties, Intersil, Inc., and Siemens
Components, Inc., in Cupertino, California.
Since 1978, Siemens has manufactured
semiconductor products for optoelectronic
applications at the site. Former underground
waste-handling facilities, which have been
removed, included five unvaulted waste solvent
tanks and an unvaulted acid dilution basin.
Solvents are currently stored above-ground and
wastewater is treated in an acid neutralization
system. From 1967 to 1988, Intersil operated as
a semiconductor assembly facility. Two
vaulted and one unvaulted underground acid
neutralization systems, now excavated, were
used in the operation. Both facilities used
various organic solvents and commercial
mixtures. Contamination, a result of releases
from the underground waste handling facilities
at both plants, has been detected in soil and
ground water beneath the site. A contaminant
plume also has been detected, which affects
offsite ground water. In 1983, Siemens began
onsite soil vapor extraction, and subsequently
in 1986, began pumping and treatment of
onsite ground water. Intersil began onsite
ground water treatment and soil vapor
extraction in 1987. This Record of Decision
(ROD) outlines the final remedy addressing
onsite source areas, and onsite and offsite
contaminated ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including PCE, TCE,
and toluene; and other organics including
phenols.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes enhancement and/or expansion of
onsite and offsite ground water pumping and
treatment systems, which use air stripping, and
the soil vapor extraction systems, which use
carbon adsorption at the Siemens and Intersil
facilities; excavating 40 cubic yards of soil
contaminated with greater than 10 mg/kg
semi-volatile organics at the Siemens facility,
followed by offsite disposal; pumping and
treatment of offsite ground water using air
stripping; discharging all treated ground water
to onsite surface water; and monitoring soil
vapor and ground water. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$18,750,000. O&M costs were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup standards were chosen
as the more stringent of Federal or State MCLs,
or State Recommended Drinking Water Action
Levels (RDWALs). Chemical-specific goals
include PCE 5 ug/1 (State MCL), TCE 5 ug/1
(State MCL), and toluene 100 ug/1 (RDWAL).
Soil cleanup goals have been set at 1 mg/kg
total VOCs for vapor extraction, and 10 mg/kg
total semi-volatile organics (including phenols)
for soil excavation and offsite disposal.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLGs; MCLs;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE; Phenols;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; Solvents;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction;
VOCs.
J.H. BAXTER, CA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The J.H. Baxter site is in Weed, Siskiyou
County, north-central California, and consists
of the 33-acre J.H. Baxter facility and the
adjacent 870-acre Roseburg Forest Products
facility. These properties continue to be used
for wood treatment operations and lumber
product manufacturing. The site is surrounded
by pasture and woodland areas with residential
areas to the north and west. Man-made and
natural wetlands exist within the site
boundaries, and Beaughton Creek runs through
the eastern portion of the site. Since 1937,
wood treatment operations at the site have
involved a variety of chemicals including
ammonical copper-zinc-arsenate, creosote, and
PCP. Numerous waste products have been
generated including tank and retort sludge,
process water, storage area drippings, and
spilled raw preservative compounds. Prior to
1983, when the State ordered the J.H. Baxter
facility to cease all waste disposal practices,
onsite waste management involved onsite
disposal and discharge, spray irrigation of
wastewater onsite, storage in tanks and ponds,
and discharge of wastewater into the bermed
200
-------
area around a 500,000 gallon tank, once used
for creosote storage and currently used for
process water storage. These disposal practices
and leakage from storage tanks led to soil and
sediment contamination. Water that was
collected by the lumber operations drainage
system was discharged to Beaughton Creek
until 1987, at which time a carbon adsorption
system was installed to treat the extracted
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, ground
water, and surface water are organics including
PAHs and dioxins; and metals including
arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation of 41,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil, followed by biological
treatment for soil with organic contaminants,
chemical fixation for soil with inorganic
contaminants, biological treatment and chemical
fixation for soil with both inorganic and
organic contaminants, and onsite disposal of
treated soil in lined cells; leachate collection
and treatment; ground water pumping,
followed by biological treatment, chemical
precipitation, and polishing, prior to onsite
discharge of treated ground water;
implementation of institutional controls; and
long-term ground water, surface water, and air
monitoring. All sediment in the site drainage
system with detectable levels of wood
treatment chemicals will be excavated and
treated with stabilized soil. No remedy for the
Beaughton Creek sediment is proposed unless
additional data indicate the need for further
action. Surface water contamination will be
controlled through soil remedial actions that
will reduce contact between the contaminated
soil and surface water. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is
$37,829,100, which includes an annual O&M
cost of $1,207,600 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals for soil
remediation include arsenic 8 mg/kg
(background), carcinogenic PAHs 0.5 mg/kg
(10* risk level and detection limit), and dioxin
1 ug/kg (detection limit). Chemical-specific
goals for ground water remediation are based
on MCLs or non-zero MCLGs, State MCLs, the
10"5 to 10* risk range, or whichever is more
restrictive, and include arsenic 5 ug/1 (10"5 to
10* risk range), PAHs 5 ug/1 (detection limit),
and dioxin 0.000025 ug/kg (lO"5 to 10"* risk
range).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be required for all areas where
treated waste has been deposited.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Biodegradation; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Dioxin; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground
Water Treatment; Inorganics; Institutional
Controls; Leachability Tests; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Treatment Technology.
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC, CA
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1990
The Louisiana-Pacific (L-P) site is comprised of
an active wood processing plant and a landfill
in Butte County, Oroville, California. The plant
and landfill are 1/2 mile apart, separated by
another Superfund site, the Koppers Company
site. The plant lies within the Feather River
flood plain with the river located 1/2 mile west
of the site. Area land use is agricultural,
residential, commercial, and industrial. The
plant rests on mine tailings created by dredge
mining activities conducted from 1900 until
1969. Since 1970, plant activities have included
log storage, lumber production, and hardboard
manufacturing. Wood wastes have been
disposed of onsite at the landfill. Possible
sources of contamination at the site include
discharge of wastewater and plant process
wastes from the site, and contaminants
migrating from the adjacent Koppers site.
Between 1970 and 1984, a fungicide spray
containing pentachlorophenol (PCP) was used
onsite to prevent fungal discoloration of cut
lumber. In 1973, State investigations discovered
PCP and various other contaminants in
downgradient ground water and surface water,
as well as, sawdust and wood waste at the
plant and landfill. In addition, contamination
has been detected at the adjacent Koppers
Company site. This Record of Decision (ROD)
documents an interim remedy and the need to
collect additional data on arsenic and
formaldehyde levels on and near the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
201
-------
soil and ground water are VOCs including
toluene; organics including formaldehyde; and
metals including arsenic, lead, and zinc.
The selected interim remedial action for this
site includes onsite ground water monitoring;
and implementing institutional controls
including deed and well permit restrictions,
and site access restrictions, such as fencing.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $193,000. There are no
significant O&M costs associated with this
remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
EPA has determined that before final remedial
action goals for the site can be set, additional
information is necessary to determine
background arsenic levels in soil, and
formaldehyde and arsenic levels in ground
water. Therefore, no chemical-specific goals are
provided for this remedial action.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and well
permit restrictions will be implemented to
eliminate exposure to onsite contaminants.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Chromium; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; Organics;
Pesticides; Toluene; VOCs; Soil; Ground Water;
Zinc.
OPERATING INDUSTRIES, CA
Third Remedial Action - (Amendment)
September 28, 1990
The 190-acre Operating Industries site is an
inactive municipal landfill in Monteray Park,
California. Surrounding land use is primarily
industrial, however, 53,000 residences are
located within three miles of the site. Onsite
disposal activities began in 1948, and continued
until 1984. Wastes accepted at the landfill
included household and organic refuse, scrap
metal, non-decomposable inert solids, and
liquid wastes. The landfill was capped with a
soil cover after operations ceased. Two 1987
Records of Decision (RODs) addressed site
control, monitoring, and leachate management.
A third ROD, signed in 1988, addressed landfill
gas migration control and documented the
implementation of an active landfill gas
collection and treatment system. Since that
time, continued settling of onsite landfill wastes
and the occurrence of subsurface fires have
decreased the integrity of the existing landfill
cap. As a result, oxygen and precipitation
have intruded landfill wastes. This ROD
amends the original 1988 landfill gas migration
control ROD to include the addition of an
upgraded landfill cap. A final comprehensive
site remedy will be addressed in a subsequent
ROD. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the air are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, and toluene.
The amended selected remedial action includes
capping the landfill to reduce surface gas
emissions, to prevent oxygen intrusion and
surface water infiltration, and to provide for
erosion control; installing landfill gas extraction
wells around the perimeter and on the top of
the cap; collecting and treating landfill gas by
incineration; and dewatering saturated landfill
zones. The estimated present worth cost for
this amended remedial action ranges from
$125,300,000 to $181,300,000 (based on the range
of costs for the gas control system and landfill
cover), which includes an annual O&M cost of
$3,700,000 to $4,100,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
A destruction and removal efficiency of 99.99%
for each organic landfill gas component will be
achieved in accordance with RCRA
requirements.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air; Benzene;
Capping; Clean Water Act; Closure
Requirements; Direct Contact;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Landfill
Closure; O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Treatment; PCE; RCRA; ROD Amendment;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
SOLVENT SERVICE, CA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1990
The 3-acre Solvent Service (SSI) site is an active
treatment, storage and disposal facility in San
Jose, California. Land use in the vicinity of the
site is industrial and commercial. Since 1983,
SSI has been operated as a treatment, storage,
and disposal facility. Mixed and segregated
solvents have been recycled by a variety of
methods including distillation, separation, and
blending. Approximately 99% of the
202
-------
recoverable solvents are recycled and then
reused and consumed by industry. After VOCs
were detected in the ground water, the
California Water Quality Control Board adopted
Waste Discharge Requirements requiring further
site investigations and implementation of
interim remedial measures. In 1988 and then
again in 1989, the Board adopted Revised
Waste Disposal Requirements requiring
completion of the pollution investigation, final
installation of soil cleanup measures, and
submittal of an RI/FS and RAP. Interim
remedial actions conducted during the 1980s
included the removal of underground storage
tanks, paving storage, unloading, and spill
containment areas, placing berms in the
treatment and storage areas; and changing
operational procedures to minimize the risk of
additional contamination. SSI is currently
operating a containment/extraction system for
the ground water plume. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes capping the entire site with asphalt;
operating a steam injection and vacuum
extraction (SIVE) system for the removal of
VOCs from soil; extracting ground water via
three excavation trenches and five ground
water extraction wells, and treating the ground
water using bio-treatment, carbon adsorption,
and air stripping; soil and ground water
monitoring; and implementing deed restrictions.
The estimated capital cost for this remedial
action is $948,000 with an annual O&M cost of
$1,172,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
A soil remediation goal of 1 ppm total VOCs
has been set to protect the ground water from
future VOC leaching. Inorganic soil cleanup
goals have not been established due to
uncertainty surrounding the natural occurrence
of metals in soil in the South Bay area.
Ground water remediation goals include
benzene 1 ug/1 (State MCL), PCE 5 ug/1 (State
MCL), TCE 5 ug/1 (State MCL), toluene
1000 ug/1 (Federal MCL), and xylenes
1750 ug/1 (State MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be implemented to control
residential development of the property until
cleanup standards for soil and ground water
are achieved.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Capping;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; MCLGs; O&M;
Onsite Treatment; PCE; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Xylenes.
STRINGFELLOW, CA
Fourth Remedial Action
September 30, 1990
The Stringfellow site is an inactive hazardous
waste disposal facility in Riverside County,
California, approximately 50 miles east of Los
Angeles. The site is divided into four zones:
the onsite/upper mid-canyon area, which
includes a 17-acre, inactive industrial disposal
area in the southern portion of the Jurupa
Mountains (Zone 1); the mid-canyon area (Zone
2); the lower canyon area (Zone 3); and the
community of Glen Avon (Zone 4). From 1956
to 1972, approximately 34 million gallons of
industrial waste from metal finishing,
electroplating, and DDT production activities
were disposed of in unlined evaporation ponds
located throughout Zone 1. Some of the wastes
from these ponds migrated into the ground
water system and were transported 2 miles
downgradient (under Zones 2 and 3) to form a
ground water plume beneath the Glen Avon
community (Zone 4). Between 1975 and 1980,
the State removed approximately 6.5 million
gallons of unspecified liquid waste and
DDT-contaminated material from the site. In
1980, EPA removed approximately 10 million
gallons of contaminated water, reinforced
containment barriers, and improved a truck
loading area. Further removal actions included
installing french drain system fences; removal
of all remaining surface liquids; partially
neutralizing and capping the wastes; installing
a gravel drain network, monitoring wells, and
surface channels; and constructing a surface
barrier and leachate collection system
downgradient from the original evaporation
ponds. In 1983, the first Record of Decision
(ROD) provided an interim remedial measure
and addressed additional fencing of the site
and implemented erosion control and offsite
disposal of the extracted leachate. In 1984, a
second ROD addressed construction of an
onsite pretreatment plant for contaminated
203
-------
ground water, and the third ROD in 1987,
specified installation of a ground water
extraction system in the lower canyon area
(Zone 3), as well as surface channels to direct
surface water runoff. This fourth ROD
addresses the contaminated ground water in
Zone 1 (an interim measure) and in Zone 4,
and proposes treatability studies to remediate
the source material in Zone 1. A future ROD
will specify the source treatment methods as
well as a remedy for any remaining ground
water contamination in Zone 1. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water include VOCs such as TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes dewatering the bedrock in the original
disposal area (Zone 1), followed by ground
water treatment at the existing pretreatment
plant, and offsite discharge to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW) facility; ground water
pumping and treatment using air stripping or
granular activated carbon, and reverse osmosis
in Zone 4, followed by onsite reinjection or
disposal in an industrial sewer; conducting
field tests on reinjection of treated ground
water into Zones 2 and 3; and performing
treatability tests on soil vapor extraction at
Zone 1. The estimated present worth cost of
this remedial action is $115,000,000, which
includes unspecified O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No remediation goals have been determined in
this ROD for Zone 1 ground water
contamination, because this is an interim
measure. Chemical-specific goals for ground
water in Zone 4 include TCE 5.0 ug/1 (SDWA
MCLs).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Clean Air Act; Clean Water
Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Offsite Discharge;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
WATKINS-JOHNSON
(STEWART DIVISION), CA
First Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1990
The Watkins-Johnson site is an active research
and development, manufacturing, and industrial
complex in Santa Cruz County, five miles north
of Santa Cruz, California. The Watkins-Johnson
Company has owned and operated the complex
since 1963, conducting such activities as: metal
machining, degreasing, metal plating, and photo
laboratory activities. During these activities, a
variety of organics, inorganics, and metals were
used. In 1984, Regional authorities found TCE
and TCA in the Watkins-Johnson wastewater
disposal system. Further investigations
revealed soil contamination at the site and
ground water contamination in the Santa
Margarita aquifer underlying the site. The
aquifer has been designated a sole-source
aquifer used for drinking water, and is
comprised of a perched zone and a regional
zone. In addition, the aquifer is easily
accessible for drinking water supplies and for
contamination from the ground surface. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and ground water are VOCs including PCE
and TCE; and metals including silver.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes soil vapor (vacuum) extraction with
pretreatment of extracted vapors using granular
activated carbon (GAC) prior to ambient
discharge; capping and grading contaminated
soil areas to minimize the potential for
mobilization of soil contaminants to the ground
water; installing infiltration leachfields to
prevent offsite migration of ground water
contaminants in the perched zone; installing
gravity drains to transfer the contaminated
ground water from the perched zone to the
regional aquifer zone for subsequent extraction;
ground water pumping and onsite treatment to
remove contamination from both the perched
and regional zones using GAC adsorption with
offsite regeneration of spent carbon; discharging
the treated water onsite for industrial and
consumptive use and to recharge the perched
zone or offsite to surface water; and ground
water monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $2,156,243,
which includes an estimated annual O&M cost
of $167,820.
204
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water treatment standards for both the
perched and regional zones were based on
chemical-specific SDWA MCLGs or the more
stringent of SDWA MCLs or MCLGs and State
MCLs, thereby achieving a residual risk of 10"4
to 10^ Chemical-specific goals for ground
water include PCE 0.005 mg/1 (PMCL) and
TCE 0.005 mg/1 (MCL). Soil remediation will
ensure that soil no longer poses a threat to the
ground water; however, no chemical-specific
goals have been set for the soil.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be developed and implemented
during the remedial design/remedial action.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Inorganics; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; MCLGs; Metals;
O&M; Offsite Discharge; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE;
Plume Management; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; Sole-Source Aquifer; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs.
205
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION 10
(Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington)
FMC YAKIMA PIT, WA
First Remedial Action
September 14, 1990
The FMC Yakima Pit site is a former pesticide
formulation facility in central Yakima County,
Washington. The site consists of a 58,000 square
foot fenced area on the northeastern portion of
a 10-acre property. Pesticide dusts and liquids
were manufactured onsite from 1951 to 1986,
and between 1952 and 1969 wastes containing
pesticides were disposed of in an onsite pit.
Raw material containers, soil contaminated by
leaks or spills from process equipment, broken
bags, and off-specification materials were
disposed of in the excavated pit and covered
with dirt. After 1969, waste materials were
disposed of offsite. Beginning in the 1970s,
liquid products were formulated onsite, a
process that used solvents, emulsifiers and
stabilizers. Spills, leaks, and other accidental
releases of these liquid formulation materials
are believed to be sources of soil and concrete
contamination. A 1988 remedial investigation
confirmed hot spots of DDT and other pesticide
contamination in the former disposal pit.
Investigation results led to two removal actions
in 1988 and 1989, which included excavating,
removing, and disposing of 850 tons of
contaminated soil from the waste pit. This
Record of Decision addresses the contamination
that remains in the formulation areas and some
contaminated soil in the former disposal pit,
including 900 cubic yards of pesticide- and
metal-contaminated soil and portions of
buildings and other concrete structures that
contain high levels of pesticide contamination
including 1,460 square feet of concrete
structures. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and debris are
organics including pesticides and metals
including chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes excavation and onsite incineration of
contaminated soil; dismantling of the
contaminated portions of the buildings and, if
necessary, repairing those buildings where the
removal of portions of the buildings affect their
safety or structural integrity; onsite incineration
of contaminated concrete building structures or
offsite disposal at a RCRA Subtitle C-permitted
hazardous waste facility, depending on volume;
analysis of the ash from the incinerated soil
and debris prior to onsite disposal if the ash
meets cleanup goals or offsite disposal if the
ash remains contaminated; and ground water
monitoring to confirm source removal. The
estimated present worth cost for the remedial
action is $1,755,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $33,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Health-based levels and cleanup goals for
contaminated concrete structures were
determined based on a 10* cancer risk and a
Hazard Index of 1.0, and include chromium
1.0 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Chromium; Clean Closure;
Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation; Ground
Water Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction;Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
Pesticides; RCRA; Soil; Treatment Technology.
FORT LEWIS LOGISTICS CENTER, WA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 25, 1990
The 650-acre Fort Lewis Logistics Center site is
a military storage and maintenance facility in
Pierce County, Washington. Surrounding land
use is mixed residential and commercial. The
site overlies a surficial aquifer, and a deeper
bedrock aquifer that is used as a water supply
to over 85,000 people in the area. The
Logistics Center is an industrial complex, which
includes warehouses, motor pools, maintenance
facilities, and an equipment disposal yard.
From the 1940s to the mid 1970s, solvents
including TCE and PCE were used as
degreasers during maintenance activities. The
solvents were frequently combined with waste
oil and disposed of at several locations within
the Logistics Center. Site investigations from
1985 to 1988 detected VOC contamination in
onsite monitoring wells and offsite private
wells. As a result of these findings, affected
residents were connected to a public water
supply. This Record of Decision (ROD)
206
-------
addresses restoration of the contaminated
surficial ground water aquifer, and provides a
final remedy for the site. Confirmation soil
sampling and further characterization of the
deep aquifer contamination will be evaluated as
part or this remedial action. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including PCE, TCE, and DCE.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes pumping and onsite treatment of
ground water using air stripping to remove
VOCs; discharging the treated water onsite to
infiltration trenches, including one trench
located upgradient to facilitate flushing of
secondary contaminant sources; long-term
monitoring of ground water; conducting
confirmation soil sampling; investigating the
deep aquifer contamination for possible
remediation; and implementing institutional
controls. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $9,068,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost (exclusive of
maintenance) of $517,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup standards are based on
Federal MCLs and include PCE 5 ug/1 TCE
5 ug/1, and DCE 70 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented onsite and in
downgradient offsite areas affected by the
contaminant plume.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; O&M;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatability
Studies; VOCs.
SILVER MOUNTAIN MINE, WA
First Remedial Action - Final
March 27, 1990
The five-acre Silver Mountain Mine site is an
abandoned mine dump in Okanogan County,
north-central Washington. Land in the site
vicinity is used primarily for cattle grazing, and
the nearest well, two miles away, is used for
cattle watering and irrigation. The nearest
residence is three miles south of the site.
Operations at the mine were initiated in 1902
to extract silver, gold, and copper from soil
and ore. From 1980 to 1981, a cyanide leach
heap of previously mined material was
constructed in an attempt to extract (leach out)
silver and gold. The heap consisted of 5,300
tons of ore on top of a 20 ml plastic liner.
About 4,400 pounds of sodium cyanide were
mixed with water and sprayed on the top of
the heap. The cyanide-laden effluent was then
collected in a leachate pond at the base of the
heap. The heap leaching operation was
abandoned in late 1981 without cleanup of
contaminated material. In addition,
approximately 5,200 tons of unprocessed mixed
material (mine dump) lie to the west of the
leach heap. In 1982, the State took action to
treat the cyanide at the site using sodium
hypochlorite to partially neutralize the leachate
pond and heap. In 1985, the State conducted
a site stabilization effort, which included
removal of liquids from the leachate pond and
installation of a 33 ml plastic cover over the
heap and pond. Empty cyanide drums were
also removed, and a fence was installed. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil and mined material in the leach heap, mine
dump, mine drainage area, and bedrock are
metals including arsenic (naturally occurring)
and other inorganics including cyanide.
Ground water beneath the site contains
relatively high levels of dissolved anions and
cations as well as metals and cyanide
associated with the mine dump material,
however, low ground water quality and
quantity make it an unlikely drinking water
source and will not be addressed by this
remedial action.
The selected remedial action for this site
includes consolidating all contaminated soil and
mine dump material with the leach heap,
followed by grading and contouring the
consolidated 5,740 cubic yards of contaminated
materials; capping the heap and consolidated
materials with a soil/clay cap; plugging the
mine entrance and removing a mine drainage
pipe that supplies the animal water supply
tank and installing a new well for an alternate
animal water supply; implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions; and ground
water monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for the remedial action is $635,600, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $39,650 for 30
years.
207
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All material contaminated with concentrations
of arsenic greater than 200 mg/kg (based on an
HI=1 and a cancer risk level of 10"4) or cyanide
greater than 95 mg/kg (based on an HI=1) will
be consolidated and covered. Ground water
treatment will not be implemented unless
monitoring detects concentrations exceeding
standards set for six contaminants including
cyanide 154 ug/1 (based on a health advisory),
and arsenic 6 ug/1 (based on 104 cancer risk
level) at the point of compliance, which has
been established 100-200 feet downgradient
from the edge of the leach heap.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
disturbance of the consolidated, capped
material.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water Monitoring;
Inorganics; Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals;
Mining Wastes; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Disposal; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations.
TELEDYNE WAH CHANG
ALBANY (TWCA), OR
First Remedial Action
December 28, 1989
The Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) site,
in Millersburg, Oregon, is an active plant used
to produce nonferrous metals and products.
The site consists of a 110-acre plant site, which
contains the plant's former sludge ponds, and
a 115-acre farm site, which contains four active
wastewater sludge ponds. Portions of the
TWCA site are within the Willamette River's
100- and 500-year floodplain. The Wah Chang
Corporation began operating a U.S. Bureau of
Mines zirconium metal sponge pilot plant
under contract with the U.S. Atomic Energy
Commission in 1956. Additional facilities were
subsequently built near the plant beginning in
1957 to produce nonferrous metals and
products. The Lower River Solids Pond (LRSP)
and Schmidt Lake sludge pond, which stored
wastewater generated from the plant
operations, are being addressed by this
remedial action. The 3-acre LRSP received
sludge from TWC's onsite wastewater treatment
plant from 1967 to 1979 and currently holds
approximately 75,000 cubic yards of sludge.
Schmidt Lake covers 0.6 acres and accepted
approximately 10,000 cubic yards of sludge
from 1974 to 1979. The sludge in both the
LRSP and Schmidt Lake contains heavy metals,
organic compounds, and trace levels of
radionuclides. Because the ponds contain
radioactive materials and are a potential source
of ground water contamination, TWCA decided
to cleanup the ponds without waiting for the
full site remedial investigation to be completed.
This interim action addresses the contaminated
sludge in the LRSP and Schmidt Lake.
Contaminated soil in the sludge ponds will be
addressed as part of an overall site remedy.
The primary contaminants of concern from the
sludge in the ponds are organics; metals
including chromium, zirconium, and lead; and
radioactive materials.
The selected remedial action for this interim
remedy includes excavation of 85,000 cubic
yards of sludge with partial solidification of the
sludge, followed by offsite disposal in a
permitted solid waste landfill. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$10,716,000, with no O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected remedy will attain Federal and
State ARARs. Individual contaminant goals
were not specified for this interim remedial
action.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: The offsite
disposal facility will comply with solid waste
disposal permit requirements to ensure that the
sludge mixture is isolated from the surrounding
environment.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Floodplain; Interim
Remedy; Lead; Metals; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; Radioactive Materials;
Sludge; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatment Technology.
208
-------
SECTION III
RECORDS OF DECISION SUMMARY TABLE
FY 1990
The FY 1990 Record of Decision (ROD) Summary Table provides an overview of site
problems, selected remedies, cleanup criteria, and estimated costs provided in the
RODs signed during FY 1990. The table is presented by Region, in alphabetical order
according to the site name.
-------
V
1
to
1
"8
!
4)
i*
g
fe
t- "O V5
0 C to
> (0 0
> [ J
sis
CJ CM *S
&
J2
C.
3
C
B
6
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
g
_3
"Q
QJ
(A
1
E
^y f v) ti
-•§1 s ^^
U °- ™ 60 60-2 Si T3
•DO . o 3 C
^W»^«C^§«
ycjXSi C'u s OTJ
C ". (jA .C O ^ fl] _Q U
-^eS 5s S!"B o
l-ffg ^ s Is g
1 6b2^2 f S o a
eEij«n'5^c^ .
•B«gEc|uE;fa
s§!i°-^!i;e
gaj2«-s.gjii^lS
«Ct£sn2it3s"T3
u S-^c^ a-S-cS
= c'S>,«!nlenJ«"Sre
c2^ E^^ 1 SJ Sg
..
(0 _^ O,
^fc- W5 -S CO
o ra u
Offsite leachate treatment at a wastewater
treatment facility prior to offsite discharge c
treated effluent to offsite SW; offsite
incineration of the sludge generated during
leachate treatment; monitoring of landfill g,
and providing the criteria for excavation of
contaminated soil deemed impracticable to
•^
CJ
c
I
tn
o
•b -a
a c
•2 -c ™
S -c re
E
•^
3
o
o
S-2
Sg
v> ti
60
•^ s-
^
C
"^
o^
w E
y .,
ft .
j?S
X 0
bo c
C flj
e _g
uj a
312
o re
process; GW pumping and treatment using
chemical precipitation, air stripping, and
a1
wa
i
T3
1
-S3
c1 *^
^5 |
l-a
.= CQ
u uT
'c 1
n3 C
£?^
O 0,
o
o
c^
t
< uf
>• T3
> C
8-S
-1
«i
E 55
> vj
^2 w1
cs O
si f ^
DO W
^, S
U> A
g ^
S u
TJ S
•S 're
biological treatment, prior to recharge into
aquifer or discharge to onsite SW; treating
-a
c
re
u
'S
re
£l
11
"3 i!
E-g
to
? ^1
.S 3 S
-a w ,-> j=
-2 y °
c "S
.S _r •= 60
W 3 g =
S u e o
C ^< " «K
o S re «
'^ ^•'v ^a
™^2§
•S w $£ .S
13 ai — ^
nj r; *X •*
•= 1 3 3
N M
•g s-^M
ra A co O
S
V -r=
from the air stripper using incineration or
activated carbon filtration; implementing sit
access restrictions; and air and GW monitor
1
O
in
g
r-j
fj
1
^
c
1
211
-------
a E
C «J
-,
: -g i s 1 s
: oj o o,
T3 D.CJ
oS'S
G S s§ s
S ^ll
ffi
i
2
S
O^ en
ell §
£.* °>
to -a s -a o
j_, 18 'C <5 _
c fa S ^ 1
ms*
s§ln
j- ~
212
-------
5 c
^ «
s a
o
Q.
I
Components of
Selected Remedy
O
o
CO u
sf ££•
S S c
§ai
*
'
!u^*a;M_3xr c
II.M 1|!I
-s
"S -S g g I £ f
-S-BS^Je!
g §ti="S.||
-
leanup levels are
ating GW and SW;
soi
nd
eering controls; collecting
l gases, followed by vapor
rption; GW and air
plementing institutional
deed restrictions
0
o
SlillllK
53
g,.g
IS
3 T3
<>•
0
o
*
.
•S S f= -S! S C •- 2 « (U -C
i.-UU^^H1:*'
- cS^-.S'5 « g)'ft= £i iTra'Co
ogg*^:ii'S'5fSa.-SoSS
±I-S-sfi§i-sgg'Sa'g?i§
U
X C
- M IB 3 X. ,, C~
O C in
to _ra co
gl^S IE
E .E =5 -S » S |
E 3. ° i E E
I Sw'!^ 8
=3
»
^ 0
—T _,
' -
.
"5 5 '0 -a
_, rri W '£3 3
e -1 y Sf S 1
w ? S. o £,.£
2
o
o
o^ S
o ^2
213
-------
^
•£ "O en
tls
S -s.S
CU U4 IV
Sfl co °«
£ U O
a,
en
1
U
CM
D
C
CO
a;
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
CU
_3
O
>
jy
w
•2
5
I
Threat/Prob
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Actior
c
0
°5o
S
o f
O OS
CN O O
IN S ™ -
2 Ss S |
*>~ £ S "I c
Sal si
.a -a
's u -S £ S <"
S P 1 % * a
0 T3 "3 « ~i>,xl
«2 c e - |° o
1JJO81
?tjsi*
*§ ~ E § 'i -
cu H o _-
£8 6o<-g^
- (X _* 1 U_ 3 u
•- -S ^ in S, CN S
g -a g in g,tN ^
^IS^slI
60
•1 » S c ^
.3 .E .2 M a .b
Excavating and treating soil and sediment i
low temperature enhanced volatilization;
backfilling treated soil and sediment and
covering with clean soil; pumping and
treatment of GW using filtration, air stripp
and carbon adsorption followed by reinject
onsite; decontaminating buildings; removin
drums, debris, and sludge for offsite treatrr
and disposal; disposing of all treatment
residuals offsite; and conducting GW and a
fi ^
-o c
X T3 C 'S
0 ^ ?,.£ « »
0 r= .-, =6 T3 ^
in o g S >*.3
o" -iS m *£> in •£>
rri J£ -n
T3 > _ n 13 m
3 w -S s v, S
« -a | t ^ P -a -
s-slfllil
I^Sl^S-e-
l^l-sSBMl
"-liS^'Sl I
• — ^ C?s~ bbTj i-
^-S8ggc3.l-5
OJ
>- 'x
* E
CO 5 CO
c ^ Q o c
II 1 1 '"
11 1 § -a
< E-1 tn o cs
CN
monitoring
o
o
O *-J
8"§£
Sli
.2
rs
-•a
— CO tn
S en J3
ll^
£ w|
— -a <
CM C I.
3 CO CU
e - S
S g&
u -a so
fc £.s
tg X
til
"co cu
.CJ J=
Pumping and treatment of GW using chem
precipitation, air stripping, and granular
activated carbon; incinerating fumes from I
"8
ta
'C
s.
«
o
•z.
Jl
'5
1.1
GW contaminal
VOCs including
benzene, PCE,
c
Chemical Leama
Tank Lines, NJ
CN
8-S
H
u
oj ^ '5
3 ri $
iSg n
\ cu ^J
>Sd
1/3 S
I-H ^_^ ^^
U TT S
C K>, CO
S S? ™
R 3 W
S rt ^
-° w x
tx>y »
.5
"^ /-N I"~l
- M W
.ES^
o
n j h^
air stripper onsite; discharging treated wati
onsite SW; GW monitoring; and conductinj
funher studies concerning contaminant
-a
«£
•1=6 E
ra 3 3
TCE; other org
and metals incl
arsenic, chromi
Former Liquid
Tanker Truck
Terminal and
in
•u
_S
E_
AJ
3 C
e ".
O /"N
S 3
-C CJ
u S
A
O1 QJ
^J *-J
U co
S «
s,s,
60 60
3 3
0 0
in m
'o
characterization and design and operation
the treatment system
•a
_
c
.0
Cleaning Operat
9
1
1
1
in
8"
f>
CM
3
C
CO
CU
~s
5
u
CJ
IS
I
(A
i
CU
U
S
£
tfi C
ai
Si rH
CO CU
c/i g
§ S S
is QJ
E ,3 Z
OJ CJ QJ
•s s^
3
5 < "3
0 > c
> ..—
"8 9 -a
K "3 C
CO u_ CO
•° o .
a si
™ § CO
2
CO
£"§
ra «
U5 ^Cx-N
^^ a s
x S S
3 J£!S
deep aquifer; GW monitoring; and
implementing engineering and institutional
controls
.El
"i n
"y W
.S 2 M
other organics
PAHs and pher
metals includin
Landfill
09/28/90
T3
C
CO
E
1
u
o"
'S
CU T3
SJ
w
214
-------
OJ
£
CO
s
K
i
C T3 V3
o c 5
1 w 3
"^ — U
111
|c33
c/;
U
a.
3
e
S
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
OJ
E
3
~3
•>
V
w
^
>
B
cu
_Q
p
>
CO
cu
u
s
^ o
41 r? U
P- Q ^
^ §3
oJ 2 -5
4-1 P3 CJ
See
w .5? S
<*> CS
c
o
'5b
cu
a
o
o^
so" c
«a
•a
QJ
ts
I
M
1
Excavating and treating onsite soil using low
temperature enhanced volatilization;
f*i
"S
O /— N
O 13
~-£
5
u -s
"§ '^
CO ^
~ s
•c ra
i .s
CU c
"°. 1
'& 8
>"•
- S
II
£ £
-2 "o
u <£
CN
/— \
i
redepositing the treated soil onsite;
decontaminating an onsite building, which
of
y HD
^ c
60 CO
i <"-
^ c
3 v
u 3
•S o
O tlT
O U
> F-
£*
tu
"ro
•c
u
x
3
TJ
C
!2
o jS
s s.
~
Ss
1-1 c&
5&
w
includes removal, offsite disposal and treatmer
of asbestos insulation; excavating and treating
a
c
CO
bO
« IV!
o oo
u .S
CU T3
-C 3
S.=
QJ tfl
S s
•S. v
x E
o
Os
0>
CN
£
O
0
^H
O
underground storage tanks and their contents,
liquid wastes, and associated contaminated soi
t3
g
CO - -n
^ = d^ s 1 §£ c
HS21§1^|
E^S^-oo^-Sog
silyiilli
Excavating soil, temporarily storing the soil
onsite before transporting the soil offsite for
rotary kiln incineration, followed by offsite
disposal of residual ash; pumping and onsite
treatment of GW using air stripping and
emissions controls, if necessary; reinjecting
onsite the treated GW from the upper aquifer
upgradient of the contaminated area;
discharging the treated GW from the
**i
^^
«'§
0 •£•
a
y 5-a
. S -a S> S
c > c ff ™
8 js ™ ° « £
0 •B rjj t. m .S
•^> 'C ri 4J rn "O
? 5 p x: y 3
^•g "s Ng 1
^ £i C JT C — 3
f|lslll
•= e u ^ o ,
"ffl ^
fi —
u rs
'2-5 M
I2. ± | .i
H t- ™ «? E
c dj ^ oo
5 s -s ^ :
£d £ § S
CM
M
•S
8-
T3
U
Si
CQ
&
intermediate aquifer to an existing borrow pit
area; and continuing site access restrictions
1
§§
Kill
£££§
u
1C
9 1
S^JP
c c "to
SB I*
"111
? ffl " 3
s y n o,
g o 2 Q,
cB -53 c co
^ « (fa
Jj (3 0 CO
W flj ^b^
(J J ^ M
Sill
n
Permanently relocating all residents; sampling
and, if necessary, decontaminating, salvaging, i
disposing of mobile homes remaining onsite
after completion of permanent resident
relocation; and implementing site access
7
CU
1C
1
£,
S
2
g>g,
T3 T3 S
•o a ^ 3
CU CO U "o
"5 .E •£ c i-
J2 r" """ CJ
g E w w J3
« S •- 13 o
™ ti c *3 °
^ 1 as-s
73 U £7 C3 C
S s ° «r *
=5 1^5"S
« -g & 2^
>-
2 ~o
G
C c - ™
QJ S
Sf s 2L
03 | 8
b to « a,
CN
*?
S
g
restrictions
.a
2
CO
|
TJ
C
IS
h~J
"g
•§
13
C
215
-------
icord of Decision Summary Table
K
1
f
ft
^
C -o
o e
> ™
s.a
QJ OH
I3
S
S
J2
o
a.
3
C
_
Components of
Selected Remedy
.
a;
1
a;
3
IX
i_
c
o
Remedial Acti
c
o
'5b
OJ
PS
'
Q
$252,700,
c
o
•a
2
•S
5
"S
S
1
3
8
1
60
C
'•3
_3
1
60
C
1
tw
T3
C
ro
60
_e
1
S
^
_
cs
.c
'i
"8
en
C
*S
c
8
1
E"
_3
'a
T3
3
c
o
cs
o
$348,700,
•o
£
£X
«^
ro
0
'o
60
o
A
Montclair/West Orange Radium site soil) and
,-,
1
S
E
3
TJ
2
S
a
CO
*C
1
_c
60
y
10
c
-Q
1
1
•J
other radium-contaminated materials from
xT
tt
o
present w
based on
selected
"8
I
5
X
QJ S
=3 1
^ ^
li
II
« ro
c
o
transports
residential and public properties, followed by
offsite disposal; filling excavated areas;
environmental monitoring; and continued
treatment technology studies to reduce the
Residential
Community
06/01/90
1 1
1 S
volume of materials disposed of offsite
"ro
c
E
"O
c
cs
S- g o So
F: § •§ 2-1
»— i CV P CS O
w -iJ ? - S c?
T3 CJ ^ "O
tj 60 Tj
e .E a fc c
'5 -a u £ —
K 3 Cu 4^ w
2 T3 . ° ~S
c c " \n U
° '3 § i E
cSglfll
5
^
•! 1 |
.S 4J ^
1? a Cl „
5 fl § -
cs
^_
o
interim ARAR waiver will be invoked as part
this remedial action
216
-------
g| 8
c!
« §"=8
Si o o
a
Si
R
. «^.g -
|"S a § g'g.g 8 g «|-g1
^'
60
•3
.
l! 1
is
s ^ = To afi>
£ =3 cu § «i ^ |
i in ii
1
I
o
•o
c
g
ffi«
S .2
.9 ~
he ex
g/kg,
500
SCA Spil
EPA's "Gui
Remedies
with PCB
m
>
^K°
E ™ -S
sil*
A |^
11.
ST3 S
•p C ^2
S ™ eg
g=£?
E S-5
S «
2 lif
'j5 "> .0
i E I
s-§ s
™- £
.1.SS
Hi
8!^
1s-
a
in
ted
1
js ?
CJ <£i
•a §1
ffl 's w -a
U (0 . rv O
£ C _e *-<
-------
US
c.§S
ISl
'5b
g?i§.l^
•= .s _
w E eo 2 .2
S S -g w S
* §!"§ 1
W y M nj c
o
"8
!|i,j
o
S" 3 h
-— 3 4J
O
g_g»|
'E -O n J= £
'S -a
" c
ro
El2|
2T3 .°ooSBo-
S.S g «.E i.S.2
-,•§ bcS"
.E ra .B
Si
.
1 if S -
O > w .S o
o
s,
00
c
_OJ
CQ
3
'S >•
3 C~
S g-
r> ^~ G V
II II
I
218
-------
£ -a «
| Si
— u
4-1 CS
c .s s
?
_OJ
JD
8
OH
>
V
£
£ §
fl 5,1
.§ill
w <5S .5? £
0/5 K
C
O
'Bo
S
o
S
or
00
00
Tt-"
w
K
a
cj
V
'S
o
o,
3
£
ts
"u
'5
t/5
V
•S
o
§
(S
'•&
re
1
u"
60
T3
_3
"w
I
60
C
•a
§
S
S
•a
<£
1
W5
O
2
QJ
•O
0
£ §9
^ m «
n °° &
9 (NO
? w ---
li i? || a-og
ii^|IIS Sg?
ffl E i! S ffm ^ 'T ^ u e°'oi
ra §-" i5 "^ ^ 3 1 -"1
•s-S-^'li-s'a 1 « "1 x,'5
'n^'S0o:^2S^w2a^
Qj5??ocsy5^?;UPnoc
-Ch-j c cj.o^-'^— 'JsH c_> cj cs
J5 E- .5 cs
60
01 C
™ "E
5a
v *
§^ §
| 1 £ «s
£ £,=
>
O
— r
tn
T3
C
J3
u
c
S
u
c
3
CN
4_J
c
QJ
8
S
-&
1
S
a
1
^
u
"O
J3
"D
c
W5
§
60
a
cs
QJ
f
S
i
^
tw
CS
Xj
c
's
T3
1
b
_g
60
C
^
3
CJ
_C
3
>
2
0
ij f^
o §
i I
75 _ *
r^s
>^I
CO
r^ O — •
, 0 ^
£jj . OO
M O 3
— *""'
/-^ 2 pq
dlE
S-S.H.
^-^
CU ^^ HJ
ts H ™
4J U 4-1
55- S SiS
table aquifer to capture contaminated GW;
supplementing the drain with extraction wells
screened within the Red Bank aquifer;
i/r
o
C a:
.S-g 2
o. S u
- E
y £ i
<^s g
i 2 b"
I w S
S u is,
Z P >t
I
(A
S
a.&
« r.^
ro u
5£
r-N
S
BBgS
s s s a
11^1
to e^ 55 —
^ ^ ^^ BO
~KX 1>. X 3
60 60 66 o
3 1/1
S ± ° P
^ ^r 10 c
c S .a i
Sees
3 Ji Si 2
"r"! >^ 1-2 ^*
" x re '0
o
constructing an onsite wastewater treatment
plant consisting of air stripping,
precipitation/filtration and carbon adsorption
dewatering and testing of residual solids for
-a
.*-
C T3
$ %
ili ™
(C ~
60 E
.E -2
^ E
- S
y h
.E "5
- I
^
•x. -0
O C
O CN
1
OJ
ra
£
^
ex
3
O
in
•g
_«
T:
2
re
offsite disposal; reinjecting treated GW or
discharging into a recharge trench onsite; GW
and SW monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls
-------
Present Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
o.
a
1
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
i
J2
£
S
to
5
5
Threat/Problem
> S
^ S .2
„:• ;?> co t^
1 §,Q ^
to S E
vj .2? N
GW contaminated \
VOCs including ben
CU
3
c
S
<
12
•§ e£
c E
22
CN
1
•1
Z3
u
S
I
1
u
§
1
•o
c
IS
$18,600 -
$394,100
necessary; reinjecting the GW onsite with an
evaluation of the feasibility of using infiltration
basins as an alternate means of discharge;
covering the disposal area with clean fill;
u
g
•a
c
a
E
•a
c
5
OJ
S
£
S
?;
c?
<>
o
(O&M, based
on differences
developing a contingency plan for the
installation of individual carbon adsorption
CD
C
'£
t
V)
in treatment
and
units on residential wells, which may become
affected by migration of the contaminant
monitoring
systems)
plume; monitoring GW and SW; sampling the
sediment; performing a treatability study to
investigate the need for further treatments to
remove toluene, lead, and chromium from GW;
VI
1
8
1
°
£
1
tj
c
1
i
^c
a
-S
T3
C
(3
on air stripper units
« Is- 1
a If s
« S, 2 o
V» .3 5 ty»
1
1
U)
S
Excavating drums, containers, and highly
contaminated soil; consolidating the waste and
overpacking drums as necessary; containing
contaminated soil, and transporting the material
offsite for treatment (possibly incineration) and
disposal
13
1C
I
en
n
z
c
•c -E
JS LTT3
Soil, sludge, and de
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE,
toluene, and xylene
other organics inclu
phenols; and metals
^
— 3 e
8 g.-o|
P -3 c a
cu g ^ ™ J
M-5 .1 So'S b
'E S 02 = 3
5 S S 2^ S «
O CA
O i— '
220
-------
~
'
(3
O.
3
C
s
Components
Selected Rem
22 QJ
"8
o
0 >
60
11
8
S
|
•5 60
3-S
1> 3
gl
* 8
C
jy £T
=5 60 'C
a .5 2
III
^ .2 E
S I 3
60 to S
•a ^ E
0 QJ S
X » C
w "Z S
CO ^S
"S
w
JS "w
I i
.11
il^ffl?
jifi!
•s "o a.-a "o
5 iS ffl EJ .S
s
co"
8
°
8
O £4
£ I.
S
•S~H 60 g I 8
-= 3 .S g1 < ."S
aj C ^ u ^ n
i p .5 & 5 .•§ S
ii.E-3 bo, 55 TS "
•a 5 3 ° 5 c 60
^liijs.;-!
a§rt«^.-s^-g
60
_c
2
221
-------
1 e g
l> a o
^ — U
S S s
4J OH ^5
833
a.
49
a
3
C
£
0
ot
1 g
u A
I?
|j
o*
a
£
3
1
>
S
to
1
e
QJ
S
s
ex
>
s
h
fc g
«T "^ S S
C P4 1— ' •<
g?§ -s
a | «"S
•^ a .& §
to c<
c
.2
SP
c£
aj
3
___
"S,
D.
ra
O
V
3
S
"5,
a
ra
O
^
0
1
1
8
1
t
£
00
c c
2 'C
8 3
C8 -g
o o
z e
aj
£>
S
11
aj
Q
Z
IS
J2.I
5g
g E
ii
£3
(S
is 2
Resideni
Subdivis
8 „
g
I J
CO U
I *
-8-8
M
* 1 -8 8 -8 -s c S
liilf
•8
w
o
yl
T3 f
•S-c" •
•> s E
S
UHH
:2 = -a ~ "2 Ti
5 8 S .E a .S
T3 U
(5 _
11
222
-------
in 2
J2 2
te u K
O £ ta
w
00
!«3g-s
•a
'E -a
-g^l 2gS;'S
™Et>0 J= .!
|S||
liaiSl Ill § =33 -a 55
in
vO
CO
u c
111
2 1 E
ll.i;s^-s
« a •§ s «> J
.i .s "S E? is »
«J S .S o ^ .5
~ S « ^ 'G "g
—- g 0 u '= 2
o
> —
s 1 8..K
Z =
•a
I
u-
Ov t/j
O »—i
223
-------
u
o
g
"8 .a 8
tfl c r"t
.8 -3 ™ -g M
y M E -a
= < c g s
i a =5 i ^
9 3 U T4.
.2 # 13 -.13
£ a -s 9 S
ra O
•O ... BO £0 i)
llllllil
IilPJ!
^
IltHliP
xl«'=l££!3'?
w-S'-a E §. £> S .E g
§i
6 5
•o .y
CO fo
« 5 eo g ° IS ." e1 i
*r* C 5* i— S wa ..3 P
^"Sl-2^ ^s^ I
-11SJ«!11^
!-E
=
-a - |
III
1 around site perimeter
T3
S
E"
_3
Installing a ;
CJ
.e
o
tx>
c
1
1
£
s
o
IO
ib«
o
f
Q.
OJ
•a
CO
CO
c>0
tc
1
VI
.E
1
JO
X
.2
CJ
60
^C
'c
e
8
CO
•8
c.
2
u
'«
1
1
2
c
•§
2
E
temporary ir
itry of precipitation;
rithin the slurry wall
V
%
1
|c
surface to m
f
I
5
extracting G
>ose of dewatering onsii
tr
3
0.
0)
r-
L^
boundary foi
ovement of contaminate
E
bo
_c
|
8
•g
CO
1
:e; transporting extracte
*E3
CJ
"S
«-
X
CO
O
tment, treatment, and
CO
I
0.
Ui
o
c;
a
i
g
monitoring; and
5
w
•o
c
CO
^
O
W
'•3
S
"«
1
•o
1
<0
§
JU
<0
maintaining
"8
S
'0
R
o
o
Ov
I
224
-------
81
SI
2 •%
T3 ?,
<£ M /-<
I
•9
C
ra
"•S
Hill? 1.1 II
•is s 2
•a
c
w
« &
>•
u Q
-------
O
a
ra
a?
at!
B
O
'Bo
1
1
O
il
•liifr
1§S|E
I 2 1 •§ SS
1|1!1
cu s^ cu TJ £
S .§ "S g ^
u c^ »S
Illll
I ^"TJ E H
"8
tc
1
§.
Soil contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
cu
o
[if
T>
E
CO
00
•3
3
'E
CO
S?
o
2
CJ
•o
B
CO
vi
a.
including chromium
and lead
".
a.
3
1/1
•5*
53 TO
•a c
is
2 -K S - -o
$N O ~ ^
.St-si! -g s -g.
5g> <2 ot S
•o oo -ij S =
s §
t—i CX
l|111o§l^|S^
& j$ jz a u>-i" co o "t: -2 o o co
If PI
sil-il
ssjs a E
cu
00
T>
_3
:-5
E O
|TJ
.1 e
TJ CO
S|
•- « oo
illl
11*1
J2
O
Jl
S |
2 a " x = -a I
§§I1M1
tN
fl
•g-S-
ja-g
"S? c
g
226
-------
12 E
c
OJ
•&
Is § i
'
8
lilt! MHi
TS
c
1
0
IS
«
. ™ ,, •% -a g ^ e
liilllllll
3
&
= 2
1 3
go
"2
2
^
^
E ^
B
18 £•
•a t
£ ra
?
^ T3
»o c
o cs
227
-------
O
U
o
o
^- /->
§.§
fv a
•a
c
£2 = -
\ f — O *&
« -e o £8 * %
1 g S/f-j^-aj?
«-2^1|s.a|
^j£|*ni*e
*iys^-
.a
•s « 5
i-s <
«„
.E 3 .2
If
8-S'
M
0 8
a J5 T3
KH.S
lla
ill
o ,-^
o s
o o
I a-
"° e
•g •§ fl
•c
I
o
5eM I
_l&
(SE 2
"8
I
if
ja M
'I 8
b
§<
a0:
•st
> -^
CQ CQ r i
s
I
I
o
P
o >
228
-------
>
C
«
«
|
i
**i
•s.
o
o
00
^r
CO
•s"
u
E
"P
CJ
i
<
.
c*
£i
1
cs
S
CO
4_,
1
^_
o
^
§
K
R
^
^
-
8
00
,^
/•^
i S
.2
&
S
C
1
followed by offsite treatment; excavating 3£
yd3 of soil, sediment, and debris with
™
O
^-/
"8
«3
C
«J
C
o
>
1
c
V
£
T3
«
M
^
_3
.£
vs
~s
V
1
w
tt
!
1
IS
S
K
^
• w
'^1
s *
ll
;J
11
e^
_e
13
subsequent stabilization, followed by dispos.
a RCRA-permitted hazardous waste landfill;
V
-a
£•
CO
•o
_1J
c
to
y
i
^
*o
•o ^
«l
m -c
jn U5
I
1
c
&
3 •«
S ~
•o -a
§ ^
CJ ~°
ll
is
•S A:
s
>
backfilling excavated areas; placing a soil c<
over areas with lead contamination above
o
o.
S
0
ep
^b
E
1/5
0
1
M
1
¥
•^
background; treating and disposing of 350
batteries offsite; GW and SW monitoring; ai
I
s
implementing institutional controls including
site use restrictions
o i
§o ^s* 5?
rf ± |3. °
11 i!
if ~ "§"§
O O r- flj
* C E
1 a K3
•a " "S '«? „
(v wa *3 Ci
!1^v
s?*|3
SS^c u re
III!
^ f= QJ (J >
Spls
§ §0,= V
(75 -g «'5 2
1
Che
,1
o
O > a
S
S •£
&
M
a S
o
229
-------
cord of Decision Summary Table
K
o
g
1-a
O C to
— CJ
C .ti *S
&
^
a
3
£
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
QJ
E
1
£j
co
^
E
2
a.
03
QJ
C
"fiY S
-. X ^ '§
ca c* QJ ^-
2 \ S .2
a ^ ™«
« 2 c p
1/1 55 .£« g
C/3 (X
C
_o
of
PS
0
JO
cs
V)
QJ
QJ
2
a
18
1!
£
1
O
Pumping and treatment of GW using air
1
1
W
O
Z
•s
T3
E-
60
B
•a
18
2
S
18
CA
IU
Ej
s
4-1
i
o
c
C5
onsite discharge of treated water to SW; ai
<
^
£p
1
o /_N
S ^
IT) 00
w ^
& "e
llBislS^S
t« si "^ cj rv £j
LH O ^ •— " ^^ 6O bJ "Si
£ cxS m U u c U >
_;^g_WwS^H^
S's3'6oy oi55-a6
J2o P£>UGO
.5 60^-^ —.S 18^
E o 6btx Cto 18 "^^^u
2S^q t | ^ O g, £
8|w°||£||g|
^ "w S r^3 ^ — SQJ
3 .« ^J * ,^ *KX &H ^
— r" U U ri *S ^ "n1 CO "*^x *^~
CO -1-" ?• & W .> ^>. M . oO yj
D,U.SSE-'S>Uo 3«
GW and SW monitoring
o
Os
-v.
5J T3
O\ C
0 M
O ^
o" f,
O c
«A -_-
•8
1C
1
w
w
1
Is
tfl
f^
To ^
41
II
CO Cw
3 OO
H
•gJS
E
1*
1
1
o
»
*c
•o •£
i '?
CO T3
QJ a
60 18
T3 C
3 "3
il
'18
QJ
fci
£
L- ^
^ 5J
CO
^^
*
o;
(A OJ
separator, and piping, and transporting the
materials offsite for disposal; excavating thi
-a
18
ll
•g-o
~ ".
c oJ"
sS
£J
QJ
tA
CO
CQ
£>
18
QJ
>
•a
s
S
O
«»
underground tank, oil/water separator,
w
's
E
•a
18
1
1
60
dumpsters, and piping, and decontaminatin
.—
'S
c
-a
18
—
eo
c
^3
j3
.£
o
o5
1
E
60 ftj
them using high-temperature steam cleanin
equipment; disposing of the contaminated !
cleaning solution and excavated debris and
S
^
S 2
structures offsite; and placing a soil cover i
the FT-3 area backfilling and grading excai
230
-------
C T3 M
0 C t»
**<5
c .§ g
W m c£
1(33
D.
w
"n
O
O
c
c
«
JL
„_, >*
o "g
a E
c «j
S
3
<:
1
3
1
>
£
p^
x c
H o
LSI
Signature
Remedial .
1
60
U
c£
f^^
- e fi^
o S ^^ ^^ ^
« 9J -S «s S
(NBC S3
S-sl g s.
v* * — ' > kj ya
ti- Based on GW velocity and
m elimination of the source, GW
concentrations are expected to
meet background levels within 5
years through natural
;; attenuation. Chemical-specific
goals for GW include benzene 5
ug/1 (MCL) and vinyl chloride 2
ug/1 (MCL)
3 a _ y
e & > 2 o -c
JH «K 2 - 2 12
liVI'M
i s| « s E § 2
g > 2 '5 "S S S .3
|s.a|l58«
a'ifSS-fl8?
eg p! (JS £X ^ O ^ C
•s * 1 s 1 11 i |
•? S"£.s « gll*
_-a°«ooc-c6o
a o «j i- a .„••• oc
^aj^l^ S'S'S
|iii;ilis
J3 W3 £ X C3 ^ M
Itlflllll
d-i- oS c_^"" a'C
DnftJ U C n
< _
- C
§ •§
K a s 1
*j QJ ON C
S 1 S? E
w o es .
° ^
CO
/— \
o °^
o O
O 4J *— '
S"§2 8
oo S C CN
c£ fe, S LO"
6» ^ ? 09
Any tanks, equipment, and
structures identified as a safety
hazard and health risk will be
decontaminated and removed to
an offsite facility. Any waste that
cannot be treated onsite will be
removed to an offsite facility
£l-o *§
"§§ 1?
ffili1
2 33 «£ 1
e e 1 •§ B -S
£ I £ S -2 -g
± g 1 b « «
S £
'9 S S " < ">
u5 i ja o a, (N
60
llflff
S - M e 'S
Co e O "
-a o
- B
11!
•
I *
8s
U M« 'I
g.c^-g?
.
"§"§ b =
S
<; e
si |s cj
06 £1 S «
231
-------
tl
3 o
z^la
s g I "8
•ssag
c/3 a;
I
^11^1
£ -a u E x a
:s s «
'
l
1
i
2
j£ c
X S
1 S1 S
8.^8S
1P-
«fll
•n E 8 S?
(S T3 B
2 g S 'a
I !!
•a e "S
C -s C T3
||||
lid
o ^
U1 3
>-H O
c-S »-p^^
ms§
Mill!
« .2 c 3
2 e
•s-s
e - --g "
S "S -3 y ~o "3 ^"
= Sl^|-SgS B
11-S^II^I
•S 6
c
o
•a
re
4J .
Si
tc
•a
c
3
ts
S
232
-------
I
(N
• O
I
o
ID
I
fll
§•
1
!*
o
•2-
11
35 S
Is
o
06/29/9
T3
_g
,3
233
-------
C T3 "3
O C M
£f 5
a S .-
it*
E o o
a.
J3
a
1
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
3
"3
>
S
CA
CO
£
e
s
1? o
v S? a 'S
e I.Q <
CO C* «J —
Z \ 3 .2
„. V G -o
S S CO OJ
•S 2 c e
"> (/i .s? £
t/3 Bi
C
_g
'ee
cu
rt
o
S- -
. "aJ
"8 S
E ~
flJ r^
= g
qj U
3 u
v
°l
Is
11
—
CO 4J
r- _ >
Itamination ii
1 maintain an
icentration le
o =5 o
CJ > U
GW pumping and treatment using equalization,
pH adjustment, chemical precipitation,
clarification, sand filtration, and carbon
n cS
cu n
S S
^ g3
S? u ^
.£ x 3
TD S "3
3 ° C
e w'«
•-" U v
Q i-c "5
pS ™ bo
> a o
1
O qj
"r -£
5 *-
^ s
< D.
CU "S
.S w
u —
™ o
o
o
o o
S3
SS
£
ns GJ ^
Qd U C
C/J 3 -S
_ -a c
gas
& CO §
w u °
<: £ >
a^ ^^ >
W >-0
|!§
e o. co
1 1 i
-C °J H
SUn
fc"s
CO ^
E^
•C E
&t>
ga
lo
ill
o-a CN
" § o
5 P u
O
o
o_
r~t S o
w. ^ f
^ c S
S&i
^M
*^3 *~H
S _:7
^8
S*^
^a S
o „ 1
« -| S
e S.s
to & g 3 g E
lllhl
| M .-g ™ W
^1H1|
118
adsorption, followed by injection into the onsite
mine pit; offsite disposal of GW treatment
residues; GW monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls including deed restrictions.
A contingency remedy for OUI includes placing
solid waste in a RCRA Subtitle-C onsite landfill;
VI
S T3
4J CO
E tT v
C CJ —
"O 'E TD
C 4) C
re j£ c9
. « rt
w e
3^3
< .E •=
Sli
~ Tj >-
g.s-g
g
35
CN
O
O
^j
(A
in c
r-l <-H CO
long-term GW monitoring, and institutional
controls. If the primary remedy for OUI is
implemented, no additional actions other than
>•
C
!"£ §
.S -n O
e * °
11 I
u-5
•SB
« §
rh ^
a
£°
S"2
o ^ £?
S 'g 1!
*— ' ^^ U
contingency remedy for OU3 includes
dewatering the site during excavation; isolating
the fill area from the onsite mine pools;
treating the GW using equalization,
clarification, sand filtration, and carbon
adsorption, followed by onsite discharge; and
GW monitoring. The selected remedy for OU4
including pumping and treatment of GW in the
Clarion Formation using air stripping, onsite air
emissions treatment, onsite injection of treated
GW; and GW monitoring
234
-------
Components of
Selected Remedy
o
'5 w
o > S
03 U ^ ^
cd < S u
&!
Action levels that will trigger tl
implementation of onsite GW
CO
CO
•o
Jl
of onsite and offsite G
onitoring reveal a nee
oo 6
Ji
II
1
1
o
:e treatment include concentratiol
'53
C
O
u
CU
'S
•§
ro
S
CO
O
remediation
will of chemicals of concern in exa
I
S
1
1
T3
C
ro
cu
M
3
'o
C
1
CO
"o
o
of MCLs, a cumulative
carcinogenic risk in excess of
10"5, or a noncarcinogenic HI :
T3
C
CO
to affected residences
1
"E-
a.
D
M
J{
SJ
(2
0
<4--
_|
S
_c
OJ
f
e
businesses.
>,
1
o
'i
£J
Q.
cu
JS
M
"S
i
V
•a
.S2
§
contaminati
i
2
3
o
1
I
1
fl
installed on
cu
_c
c
i
cu
to
2
1
1
•u
c
expanded ai
cu
•a
"u
r"«
ers. Treatment may ii
1
LH
^O
1
oc
'o.
o.
•fi
Sfl
l_
"3
1
S3
•g
.1
o
LH
3
2
00
•S
ir any combination of
exchange, c
techniques
•?> 2
o>Jle
235
-------
1
Decision Summary
^M
•s
1
a!
E
1-a
> n3 o
c S 5
PO
1
o
a.
3
C
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
3
1
S
5
2
b
H
r^
s? .!
i ^u ""
Z \ 3 5
_s ^ g "8
"5 35 _bo g
en ns
c
.0
a?
ft
O
O
o_
o
o"
^
^
1
^
>4_l
'I
1
•S
3
S
1
i
_w
additional recovery we
Installing
1
!
M
O
f
1
2
c
o
0
1
S
E
Q
c
S
E-
00
S
1
S
1
^
^
2
1
5
1
1
S
§
•§
TO
LH
Si
5
|
1
CU
J3
^J
'o
-^
C
5
I
i
3
CJ
^C
>
ft.
21
1
B
^
O
y
^
i
•°
CU
•S
to
a
llowed by treatment of
£
T3"
C
CO
3
ffl
^u
>,
X
T3
B
CO
•o
c
1
B
CO
S
i
5
CU
^
"S
60
_E
^
reatment facility; expan
^i
txi
c
M
'S
D.
"S
B
•^
CO
<
O
o
i
a
1
1
«
•S
I
u.
so
_c
CO
60
reatment facility; invest:
00
^g
tw
'x
u
'I
1
U
•a
S
g1
S
,
W
r
t
s
r_^
E
1
.—
U-H
o
QJ
3
'w
1
logic conditions on the
hydrogeo
1
M
5
«L>
CO
^
B
^ 0
11
l|
^o E
y'o
|!
0 n
To
B
O
•o
3
and implementing insti
:o restrict GW use
N
•c s
, u ° '-3
_ CU C "3
-
^ S =3 's ™
1 11
« u .= u .£
E
•3
'E
2
S
E
.2 oo
I I
wed Leaching of contaminants to GW
g and SW will not exceed State
o .=
£3 CD
£ 3
- «
S a
i» .C
to u
5 «
•^ OJ
2 T.
situ dissolution of copper;
treatment of the resulting
W water quality standards, which
1/3
u*
O
§
'2
£
'•5
ysical chemical processes;
•o
c
co
^
o.
0
.0
1
CO
V
•o
J3
"u
^c
•O
C
to
xcavation
CU
w using drainage controls
&£•&&
chromium 0.011 mg/1. Discharge
from the GW treatment system
£•-0
"8 »
11
£ JS
=f 8
urralization of acidified so
site disposal. GW will be
v c
c o
1
S
0
i
I
1
a
o
•a
i
g
ated in an oxidation/settli
S
o
<>
T3
C
(0
o
vO
£
TJ
C
(0
1
CO
CO
to
£
1
3
en
•a
c
CO
C
S
: for Provision of an alternate water
S
1
W
S
T3
B
JO
1
1
,w
1
•a
•o
1
1
•o
b
5
JO
1
CO
a
1
'5
>,
o,
D.
3
(A
<^^
O
o
construct!
vision water meeting SDWA MCLs
a
0.
i£
3
S
£1
!
S
3
§
approximately 5.2-acre la
c
CO
>,
fl
CO
i
a. -a
g. c
co aj
2 a
an alternate water supply
residences; GW monitorir
. , O
O in
controls
"«
plementation of institution
.§
1
T3
•a
c
(0
i
i
13
.1 «
Jfl
I'S
cj (n
I
"u
SL
3 CU
73 S -2
.S E S
•a
j£ -a
ex
IN
236
-------
I
ro
I
0)
S
I
zs
g
g~
« II
1
i
™ 7 5 s ^
fsu E eg
m .£ -a a e
.E M e eo E
u S 8 n c g
•=> E •? .-^ e
o.
Il
l
a
C
E
SS.1
«, -g e
g
237
-------
O
0.
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
o
o
o
8
•
elllillll
g
y
south Koppers
oil washin
ollowed by
te and
Ex
lag
n
t-'8
•8
in
1
£
*
•a
C
co
c -
lililll
12
8.
a.
q
-§
a
co "•••
S u .
c .c u u
IgSl
^ vJ GJ "X
O > -5 2
JS
" o
'
o o
'
las
§ s
238
-------
a
"Milt!
•a y y c ur c
ui > £> a o ra
§1
«
239
-------
8.1
3|
a.II-a
ill
S .5,2
60
s^i
Illl
8 S
o
g
fl I .5
.,K
'§"§ g-S
1 "i i? g>-B
S -S e .5 n
O >
.5 re
1
c
1 1
I § 2
240
-------
Components of
Selected Remedy
r.ssK A-S-S
*Flo nl
<->STI S-Tosa-a n
8Sco^-3Suf«
Oo^c-'WO*^'-
t-iynj.st^Ouwo
'S
1-1
•a •-
^ ^2 e
; H a |
.S oj .2
m
s-e
ctive La
28/90
Si I s S
241
-------
o
a
3
c
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
§
S)
S
O
o
O *j
0~
o
o
MO
$4,83
l
SJ5 &
§•8 &.
8:i -a e
§ S a g §
v—' CX *3 U t-
/acuum extraction am
u
CJ
x:
o
•o
c
CO
>
£
o
c
CJ
J3
'o
VI
1
ITl
nj
.£
U
OJ
i
To
3
•a
1
CO
f
1
O
t»
c
1
1
5
O
BO
C
'a.
E
3
a.
>,
—
•s
_o
2
1
S
T3
C
CO
s
1
z
1
W3
•a
c
ca
W
s
1
1
o
_>,
T3
^
T3
3
w
V]
&
!5
CO
CO
tx>
C M -
o .S -S
S 5 _ c 8 n.2
^'§i^i
^ > 60 3 3 H
S > c -a M o
IMSJH
" e pIS
,O 0,43 _ w Cd "£
^ t7 « ^ C i- C
S"S -a
»>§,§ S
,-a
j'fi
S 3 ij
I c'I
.2 "0 co E" £?:"'« o
ffllifSs
8 ?.«§! g"gs
K •« -S « ~ '2
5 S
•8
is
o
.U
^5
w s
1?
CO
g!
-I-
,-a ca
.
c
S
U
_
1 I ja a £
S •— -CM QJ ^
•a
w c
•S 2
Illl
o
ON
S
4_, CO t*-H _N
OJ
co^|
2 «1
a-S-8
S
11
jS S
S fa
SI
2 K
i (U
1 "c «
°«o
CJ C 60
^£•1
si a
e O -S2
C w -^
| if-a
l-.-Sff
|1§I
•S r- J2 C
c ^ "S o
J '? a E
•o co § 5
S Si " O
S
-------
_0j
CA
Q
•8
1
a!
fe
|| g
-•s5
g -R.S
(A m* 08
i °
1
O
c.
3
C
S
0
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
e
1
QJ
W
CO
^
_CJ
2
2
«£
>
03
Si
^ .2
| ^Q ^
z ^ | 3
M a e e
w « & |
W DS
C
•-•
&0
(S
1 t— 1
OJ "^
in oC
o^ *"!.
feS
1 1
ll
*?j "O
w ®
^ii r3
.3 S
S Q
QJ l£*
"6 J2
ll
T3
c
a j3
•n'a
11
N
|o
•§ s
S °
8-S
11
W ™
E ^ CO
-'!-
I6l
test-pit caps with landfill cap material;
regrading the landfill cap to stabilize site
conditions; long-term GW monitoring and
M -
2 3
QJ £
^ 'I of
C "3 di
co ro O
f=?l
^ 3 .2
8 .11
09/19/90
K
21
*••
11
PH d, .C CO
O — •
,_j ;>
CJ S-j
•* V
t£
"
_;
!.£
analysis; and implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions, and site access
CJ
C
'5
1
_
tt
1
1
'£
t/l
t^-a
O rf]
M ^^ ^~"
^ o "o
**^ o e
u* ^^ §
0,13 "§
8^8-
restrictions such as fencing
0 w °
E~" ^
^— '
T3
Jj k. j= £ £,
allHi-a
c ^2 d< g ^o
S r^ *o w w P
3 to " O ^*
S *B "g gf c gj
Ti ^ S aj S»
sj D. w k- S >
*^ Q OJ ^ U U9
U CX (« ^ ? CO
E-i ra on O x; BO
Collecting and treating leachate-contaminated
GW prior to its emergence into the Mangrove
Preserve, discharging treated GW onsite;
initiating landfill closure proceedings by the
State; and conducting hydrologic, water quality,
and treatability studies. Based on study results,
an alternative remedy may include constructing
a hydraulic barrier using negative pressure;
treating contaminated GW with air stripping,
adjusting pH level, and discharging the treated
effluent into onsite shallow subsurface trenches
1
1
tA
O
Z
* c
1g -a 3
|-*l|«.y|l
"c "^ oT "w *u *2 ^ .Cj
^*u S"""1 beE 1~l
CC^ ¥j V* G 3 r~\
l>irt.i-§i
7 ,
^ :s
nj c
" 3
k- ^ O W
R s; = 5 -s
.§• .> E ^ fc
§^ «1 S "
S EJ £ 5 & £
*
or onsite SW; or a third alternate remedy may
include positive infiltration, biological treatment,
Si
c
o
c
2
$
re
1
•3
c
-•Si
^ u o
^ ^3 >
qj
2
.8
"H.
S
re
1
No further action with quarterly soil monitoring
and implementing institutional controls
including deed restrictions
-a
1
o
z
u
*
U BO
2 Z -c
1/3 - 2
2 S jo
•88 1
^S £
*
oS
l/> ^
WV-.
Facility
09/28/90
243
-------
1 "i i
g is q
l!i
E3o
OH
M
O.
3
C
n>
Si
>f c
a o
| |Q|
2 f §3
.S i I"8
'"5 55 so §
to rt
c
o
°5o
OJ
d
o
Os
°°,
S
00"
i&
5
O
1
.2
g
So
0
ta
y
1
S
g
u
u
Excavating buried waste and soil and
•a
e
I
C/5
1
'C
•8
"O
^T
C
OJ
E
1
1
g
1.
1
.c
tt
o
Tl-
G
8 tt
&i
N-^ >
£•
13
^bO
|fi
•* ™
""! %
6 ?
o a
'S S
g M
W QJ
CJ E^
*^ D-
1 S
.E •&
S,
bo
3
00
CO
"S
_u
"O
c
03
1
T3
55
consolidating them in the landfill area;
excavating and characterizing waste within
buried drums; consolidating debris in landfill or
43
.^
S
> T>
> a
W B
GW, and
contamin
g
c£
|
Q
60
C
•5
_3
"u
^c
organics
c
"O
c
3
£
• ~
U
C
O
CO,
O C?
^> og
*~* O
•
55
l_, QJ
a« u
ro oj
5 e >
> -S 2
< g,"
111
disposing of debris and drummed wastes offsite;
upgrading the existing landfill cover; partially
dewatering surface impoundments; excavating
contaminated sediment from beaver pond and
placing them in Oxbow Lake; covering the lake
and beaver pond sediment with geofabric cover
and infilling Oxbow Lake with clean fill;
>~,~°
= c
03 ra 1/3
U - -Z2
is c 3
~u 'C «J
&=3!
8" G" «
-a is •-
Pi
4> js e
D^ U (U
O
Os
\
CO
\
OS
O
c
a
_y
i
Cfl
.E
•a
l-s
.E i
13
c
E
1
w
containing the dredge pond sediment;
restocking fish; monitoring of shallow GW and
SW; and implementing institutional controls
a
*w
T3
C
(B
wT
1
o
•5
§
1
i
T3
C
M
T3
J
00
C
1
~v
£
access restrictions including fencing
§
in"
CO
Os
a
«A
i
Si
Si
a
a
1
jj
6?
«
"§
'S
£
01
•s
1
V]
•c
XI
W \-f
"> —
a " ^ £
i a « -a 5
3 | 3 8 S
r* C M
lllsll
pi 3 ^ J3 *3 -a
§ 1 _ * .§ 1
G — • *t^ W "3 Q;
fl -a .E cr.S u-
u c > g ^>
a *•§! |5
E3 "^ « S
s n xi t> >-i 3
3«=^-a
100-year floodplain of Sixmile Creek to a depth
of 5 ft, followed by onsite disposal of waste
and debris within the landfill area; capping the
landfill with a clay and soil cover; installing a
passive landfill gas venting system; providing an
alternate water supply to residents affected by
the GW contaminant plume by extending a city
water main; implementing a plugging and
abandonment program for the affected wells;
GW monitoring; and implementing institutional
controls including GW use and deed
restrictions, and site access restrictions such as
8 .. "§
'5 a) 60 »
•5 1 8> S := e~
•ti ^ *-" " ;2 5
> .--. ra o - J2 .3
llsll-M
a 3 ^ o ™ J9 J3
c T! . " eo 2 u
IpI^-L
gilillll
1
_o
'c
, 3
^ S o "ra
— r tu — ^ ^
E .& E 2& E
c Sc ^ «
5 .S.3 g ^2
244
-------
V
B
a
2
t/5
111
£ "5
4-, 13 ^
I'll
1 3 o
PH
M
0
a.
3
e
n
6
Components of
Selected Remedy
o
E
-~
$
£j
W5
CO
^
5
g
3
S
OH
QJ
£
£1
^ a a
5.H <
€e
Sec
W3 £? g
C/3 ("5
I
I
'
§
s
00
i/i
w
o
o
in
•8
w
*^r
1
«
=
°
3
Excavation and onsite solidification of
r*l
"§,
o
o
o
*0
CO
t T-
B
V
"s
M
wT
1
OJ
T3
1
J
b
's
QJ
S
2
>,
3
1
^-
1 1?
o CM
8 - 1 !!•§.
sis sl"S
t— i qj C -^ t3 •£ \
ocT o, P 2; *::: Soj — "5 uT2o\e
^•if-S^iSSf"
!?1i|i^i!
•* -S E e -H 8 ft" * "3 .£?
•gtaSgaBs^^C-^o
E-S-S-0 &£o «i £l-S
OJ
" 60 11
contaminated soil from the process area and
contaminated sediment from the ditches; onsi
disposal of treated soil and sediment; debris
recycling; onsite treatment of SW from
wastewater holding pond and pumping and
treatment of GW by chemical action and
filtration, followed by offsite discharge of
treated SW and GW to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW); biological
monitoring; installing flood controls; replacin
contaminated wetlands; and implementing sit
access restrictions including fencing
x— s
T3 C
^E
^-v o .E
a o-3
o o aj
v2- CS" **2>
M
."3
'0 ^
a »o
fii,
*> 3 C
* T3 IB
5 "S -s ""
03 « -s 'I P
•a .E 2 S^ 1
c 5 u a .3
™ I E ™ E
S c -a -^ S
5 8 S -8-5
&•
b =
ffl ^
" ftn
C8 —
« 60 0 W
u E 5" •£
OJ Ti o^ ^
11 1 H
CO
-o 9
s °
P
S J2
J3 dJ
•I
tp
J3 ™ —
«1>
T3 ? E
s
CO
o. ^
•f g
rx 3
LO 4J
LO* Q
& ^S
CX —
g^
ra 3
•§«
QJ
5 c
0 S
u C
S^
S.-S
f 3
sl
E »
ll
U So
o
Pumping and onsite treatment of GW using
flocculation/precipitation as a pretreatment t<
•s
1C
'I
(A
O
~z
•S
?
> T3
> 2
CJ m
_ c
^ 'S
5 c
ra TO
^3 c
5 8
*X3*
1
PH
fa
3
3
Q
pi
U U
t/i in
•*t-
-g
o
S
in
M
^_
Bl
S S
w 2
W "
^§
I_J
^
x_> 3
remove metals, air stripping to remove VOCs,
and granular activated carbon adsorption to
w
c_^
V
c° S
•S 3
I 2
CJ
C ^
si
O flj
> i
1
G
QJ
•C
u
u
5
'6
1
fx
00
31
r- ' °S
CO rj
«« y
j?
"a ^
x, WM
E|g
V5 ¥ C
QJ U
S.8-*
•s-g-s
« 4) 3
•§61
™ . —
Cj1 Cj1 E5
U U *
ESI
3
remove semi-volatile organic compounds, if
necessary, followed by reinjecting the treated
water onsite; treating contaminated soil in-sit
fc «> c
J3 .E 18
O "2 uT
^ a ja
P|
QJ c/i -*—
•e 8 o.
!>> - S
x c M-
•o SR
c S? U
18 O PH
60
_C
bo *U
C >•
« CJ
•c 8
3 p=
U _
23 1
w C >.
w ca o
5 S 55
00
1
S
^
CO
in
g
using vacuum extraction, followed by carbon
U3
I
•^
c
ra
S
*o
]0
W5
S.
I1IL_I
CO
w
3
•o
e
ns
E
s
s
s
'g
CJ
t/3
jjf
^
14!
adsorption or fume incineration to destroy of
£•
0
S
g
Ul
gasses; managing carbon residuals from GW
and soil treatments through offsite disposal o
o
?•
c>
1
regeneration; and monitoring soil and GW
i
245
-------
oil
i CJ
S 2S
QJ CX
K 3 u
IX
JS
§•
c
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
E
1
S2
1
g
3
!
.x^l
U g
c
'So
V
8
o^
t— 1
,_,-
6f>
M
Jfl
J^
Cu
3
C
s
1
a
1
o
•s
Excavating contaminated soil and sediment wit
o
co"
^^
c
_- ?
O
based on the TSCA PCB spill
cleanup policy for unrestricted
sites. PCBs will be remediated
>,
PCB concentrations >10 mg/kg; solidifying an
stabilizing the soil and sediment, if a treatabili
study determines the effectiveness of using
1 |
11
£
p
•5 60
•c c
> -a
v TJ
CO .S
1|
2 g
g E?
o o
V
60
E
2
U
QJ
i-J O
_
§s
S o
& >-<
o _,
1— < ! — !
a level of 10 mg/kg with a
minimum excavation depth of
inches, and excavated areas wi
solidification for organics; placing treated soil
within the old salvage operational area and
covering the area with 1 ft thick soil cover;
Area
09/28/90
o
E
c
n
;§
1
8
JS
a
RJ
1
"o
•5
3
u
B
CJ
3
T3
8
V
g
t/5
1
•a
c
g
Excavating contaminated soil and sediment fro
>,
I
^^
sedimen
c
1
1
^J-
4^
g
U5 -S
QJ C
D. °
^ ^
_y
•C . ,
ra (g
71 C QJ
w CQ 1*1.
— uti c
S f 0)
I B 3
^
o"
LO
(N
V>
1
the drum and pond areas followed by onsite
stabilization and solidification; evaluating
existing water wells for decommissioning; GW
monitoring. This ROD amends a 1987 ROD,
1 1
'o -3
c
o
3
5 2 S
•g 60-S
E °
11 »
.£ .c _£
^ w ^
8gl
—
rn .^
Groundwati
Contaminat
i
ry
60
includin
•|
°
rt
H
Industrial A
S
o
^"^
i S E &
I »| j
j.
which proposed treatment of soil and sedimeni
by incineration with disposal of the residual as
onsite
"rtl
"O QJ
c — •*
« t>0
.-. C —
ill
'CCO
S.!a-g
111
•*?
g
o 1
I f
O
o
O 4-J «
Ox Sa •£ O S
CN u C ** *y
" D. s "0
(^ & $ <&&
V _
The State has determined that
contaminant migration from th
landfill to GW must not exceed
State Prevention Action Limits
(PALs), which include benzene
0.067 ug/1 (PAL)
r"
Capping the landfill disposal area with a
soil/clay cover and installing a gas venting
system to remove off-gasses; covering the nortl
and south disposal areas with a soil cover;
offsite and onsite GW monitoring; monitoring
landfill gases; and implementing institutional
controls including deed restrictions, and site
access restriction including fencing
1
"G
g.
o
^ w ?
o -5 2 ra
1 1 .c fc | 1
cu "3 *£ c i2
« ^ 3 O CO W
1 1 1 jf 8 = I
^ 1 a a g -g i
— i C ?s C 60 Tj "O
o o o i) c' y s
to S > ^5 o .S 8
1. 1
'0 .3
'S _ E
™j ET^ 3
Sfe *3 —
> ^ o g
g tG • & 1C ON ^
|-g o •§ CJ ^
^3 S3 o S
246
-------
° = 1
*f 3
S ss
f'Sl
«
1
o
o.
S
c
S
D
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
e
3
1
£J
M
1
E
|
u5 (2
c
o
•&
tt
o
in
O w
tfS
v 35
CO i)
tf&
A cleanup action level of MBOCA
1,684 ug/kg was calculated based
Removing and treating standing water in the
lagoon; excavating contaminated soil, clay, and
"8
tc
1
V5
1
QJ
So
"O
J2 J-
«!
Is
.2 a
•sl
re ^
1 8
S
c
0)
li-
IS 5
-S g
^3
m
j? °
e ">•
I s
5 v)
on EPA guidance documentation.
The cleanup level corresponds
with the excess lifetime cancer-
lagoon sludge from a 100-ft by 75-ft area and
placing the material in an unexcavated portion
of the lagoon; treating the contaminated
0
3
X -P
"v £ S
g — o.
s?s
s'cjS
s H s
re w ^H
&0 CO &Q
u K
.1
SU
ro
oo e
** C HH
% 'C -a
•S 3 ^
O rj *-
2 S « !!
g i = -^
•s S s ^
S 61^
in
i
contaminated media, and include
benzene 410-4,500 ug/kg. GW
cleanup levels are based on
proposed Best Available
Technology discharge standards
incinerator by precipitation; treating landfill
leachate in the GW treatment system;
excavating less VOC-contaminated soil and
sludge and disposing of these onsite in the
landfill; pumping and treatment of GW using
- ^
e fc
= S
3 S
M
1
in
^? -a
Qj T)
§• «
3 7~ ]
t/5 aj
u >
Si
ra "ra o
> CL ON
B 1 sr
ra •— < 3 ^ t-1
u S S § Z
L/)
247
-------
C/5
o °a
§2
£1
CO g
§1§I"3
•s 6 .^j&So
w r T bb "P *2
cd W J2^ 4J >, *5
"^ H "aX *C "^ "O
iS-gs^ia^
-*a2fi*as
g 151 11
W 8 H .E ~ «
^ _ u t/i c
S .S2 co » cj
"8
-------
1.
M
c S
(L) *Q^
I"3
Components of
k
£
nT ^ JS
| *La
3 K E
2 \ g
.sSi
r7\ *J r"
Vj c/3 bo
v3
cn
£J
S
8
Cleanup Goals
Selected Remedy
. C
fd
O
0 .-3
CO O
in &
- T3
Soil, sediment, debris
and GW contaminate
g
1
s
.a
Q
a
X
in
^^ o
•§ K"
1 «
5 «
2 £
3ll
8--§ 1
u fa u
13 cS
•a .3 8
U "t3 CL>
15 « f
111
III
|!|
,3 o S
IB 4,
60 60 >
c c fl
il*
J..fi g
E S M
1 S J
JS j- 2
!'§.§
|ia
2 "o T3
^ -S J
2 '1 u
S a ""
1 § g"
= w '5.
§ 1 S*
ls^
a; S Si
•S g 1
c-
(U
g
1
eo
.S -a "O
•a c e
_3 03 IB
•"isf
c3H. «
> g 8"
•s c S
•5l"&
=3
IS
TJ
B
^3 o
BJ O*.
I ^
1 I
/— \
IB
c
•Z
W
U m
-- - I
HI
;a-s
§'»>'§
f-t 2 03
4? u — r
^
3^">
ii.g
^ CO qj
O O IB
..& £
§£ $
l-S'fi
1/3 g =5
n m
landfill gas collection and combustioi
constructing a slurry wall; pumping ;
treatment of GW, followed by offsite
u
'S
metals including arse
and chromium
"S
c
°£
M
ug/1. Specific cleanup standards
ja
and implementing institutional contrc
o
c
$
IB
£
C
U
1
•a
c
IB „
1*
II
ffl
•a
c
IB
vT
C
including land and GW use restrictio
access restrictions including fencing
o
o
0 £
1
si
GW will be treated to meet
Federal MCLs or State standards.
iT.a
.a s
" S
^
•~i ,g
fll 1J
Upgrading and landfill capping at th)
contaminated GW at the site will rec
•8
tc
(A
o
T3
B _r-
Sediment, GW, SW, c
air contaminated witl
wT
•w
^
_QJ
f
ll
in
o o
o ° o
"5 "-"-
S fO CO
S co in
? W (A
SW will meet State SW quality
standards. Cleanup goals must
comply with AAQS, NPDES, and
RCRA standards
fa?
§ 3
v -a
a £ g
treatment by air stripping, with offsil
discharge; GW monitoring; and impli
institutional controls including GW, 1
and deed restrictions
VOCs including PCE,
vinyl chloride, TCE,
acetone, benzene,
dichloroethane, and
_
Q
a.
Q
fl£
II
/ — \
*w
g
1
^10
eo
^c
methylene chloride;
other organics includ
o\
CO
^
C .S2 0
~ __r Q co
'§ S v ff o?
8-0 to 3 N
II 12 *
in
249
-------
n -o n
O C ti
*a8
s.9s
9J &S
« co 28
E 0 O
ja
o
O,
3
c
u
J
Components of
Selected Remedy
u
E
3
1
U
1
?
*ij (L) 3 ^
> e S M a
U -S - «> g if "a
.« OJ ^ " O QJ
"B * »| ° - £ c~
™7.s S fe^^l^
is 1 s S-S « °-^ ro
^ S •" .r ° BO"? C g
1 E-E = 8| S^-|
_-ga | Sldfa |
5§OS->;"uyj=
c^ 8>J5 S'.So, E u
« "s
5 .&
** _o
«r 'S
E 3 _
*o 2 o ra
c ., o c
5 .SE s& E
3 «= ^ -
S 1 5 § S
in
S
§- ^ 0 O
o 1
O O tX •** "* "3
S £3 S t 2 ° e
. . C S ^" •— " c
^-" ^o G. y N i/> s
W (A S £ (/> (A -S
a E 7 >, I
•g 3 S T3 ^ S
uP . S C ju — (B
•s jj|« |™| § a1
e EJSrf S'i'S^""
I oS^ad^gs
y*j-pO_.3j >- n.
Sll-a^t^l-s
o-S O w^--i «
ac^^Hin^l13
l^ll^^l
els e-sH S.s ^
s^Ss^^Ni-5
is&aHji!
Pumping and treatment of GW using advanced
oxidation processes (e.g., ozone, hydrogen
peroxide, or ultraviolet light), and lime soda
softening as necessary, to precipitate inorganic
compounds, followed by disposal of the
precipitant sludge, polishing the effluent stream
with granulated activated carbon, and
discharging treated GW to an onsite infiltration
pond; and GW monitoring
"S
QJ
G
I
V*
O
2
•s 1
'% ™-
T5 g
§ «H
c .S w" a)
•= -a u TJ
E 3 S. 'C
2 TJ ..2
g-S g-S
U uj «J
> 3 C^
> o 5 c
O > £ '5
& 1
2 .y
'C *-y "E
«S | 0 |
U. ^ rt, Os E
p E ^ E S E
C « •-" ^C ON
e -a S -a cs '
EC tH G \ T3
5 S 5 s & H
t«5 J S J O CO
U1
250
-------
>
t- *u to
0 C S
*n8
" 2 ^
c • — S
£ &^
Sfl CO °r
Si O O
PH
tfi
0,
3
B
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
CJ
1
> "3
>
S
en
1
E
CJ
13
1
^
1
£ §
l|a'|
a c v _
2 S 3-2
ill!
C/5 pS
C
O
•R
(U
rt
§o
o
o
CN~ *o
vO O
•if Ln"
w w
Effluent discharge limitations for
treated GW were calculated from
•g
™ V,
§• a
= E
ST3
. C
>,JS
^S u
o 5
^§
1 §
— 00
c s
CO 73
.. CJ
•s 1
J2 .S
cj 3
:-l
5 8
5
"re s3
8.1
si
t- CU
QJ U
1 'E
s£
LO
t_)
£
w -S
QJ C
£i
State discharge statutes, and
specify weekly averages for metal
contaminants and monthly
venting system; pumping and treatment of GW
using filtration and either air stripping, carbon
adsorption, ion exchange or chemical treatment,
J£
cj" co
11
3 C
2 "S
bo C
c ta
^ U w"
3 P CJ
g £ a
^
w
3
-a
£
£ 1=
•g^s
II
§"
«M
i °0
m °-
" 2 ™
^S"l
~ *O £3
SSS
averages for VOCs, as well as
MCLs. Chemical-specific goals
include benzene 8.5 Ibs/day, TCE
based on treatability studies; discharging treated
water onsite to SW; SW and GW monitoring;
and implementing institutional controls
T3
.a ~
'E -a
CJ c
J2 a
:luding a
romium,
.B-6
o
Os
^
CN
1
22 Ibs/day, toluene 17 mg/1 daily
concentration level, arsenic 0.045
including deed, land use, and GW use
restrictions; and site access restrictions
VI
Ibs/day, chromium (total) 0.034
Ibs/day, and lead 0.0096 Ibs/day
including fencing
o
i/)
o_
« 5 :?
« a £
fO CJ n
sal
w —
"ra re J3
&f|
0,0^
B§ S
CO _, _M
•§§1
«l!
ill
— — ( rt *•*
l^&
B O m
^ k- S
u£^
Pumping and treatment of GW using
precipitation/flocculation with air stripping and
carbon adsorption, and reinjection of treated
"S
1C
1
w
O
f
^ § e
«"Sl
"2 a M
-1.1
V3 C
'C ra r^
^ C 3C
41 o O
Q S >
E
*a
c
^3
2
Q
2
(U ,_
S S
in
5
o
*o"
i
'S'
2 °.
c/1 m
r«
^
^s
g 2
aj c/3
N v-x
1^
ff^
1 d
IB
water into the shallow aquifer; offsite treatment
and disposal of secondary waste streams
T3
C
re
..r ui
oj —
r j n3
W *-J
H u
« e
U T3
^ S
s «
S a
si
i s?
=
^
T3
C
3
^
s
re
j3
/— \
nM
29
O
"c3
3
C
C
re
S>
g>3
I3
^ o -a
803
HI
M
Hi
t/5 ^ ^
^ s a
S, S 2
3 S J£
including flocculation sludge and spent carbon;
capping the landfill area using a multi-layer
clay cap, and collection and flaring of landfill
•o
c
CO
CJ
'S
ro
ao
1.1
"7j i-
.S J
o
o
II
gases; monitoring GW; and implementing
institutional controls such as deed and GW use
restrictions; and site access restrictive such as
be
_e
'0
1
251
-------
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
8 .9
.aSil
<3 55 B§
to os
I
§1
« S
3,1
o w
8s
lities, and
water
Sanitary
rvice from
d
and
the
ted
that
l
l field,
to suppl
area of t
municipal
ire to bu
,.1SB
salj
60 r? r^ fa >-.«r---SC^JU"'*:1O5
.sl llUl 8.1 ifi-fi fi s>fa'£ fil
1 c £ « » —s »at>--
^tfe^^S "II'SJ
>U ft g-j-'S = g>" « 2 «
III?*
Si =lt
i'ili"
6 =5 5 S -S
illlll
I is
dences within the affected aa; closin
abandoning all existing private wells withi
affec ea that draw from the contami
ted
resi
! w -^
13 w
s K £•
s ™ a
g.a s
•n •= i-
°- eg a
gg
II £
'8J! s
•^ CC IM
^. w re
o iu -a
M-S a
lei
a re
II
_ !Q 23
c 'E S | £•
SI 111
§ £
252
-------
O
o.
3
o
o
2 S
2 S c
I?
H
O (A
8
o
11'
O 35 '
o* iJ
co cL
8
8 g
"
«re
'§.
sgl
111
1 §
8
2 rt
CSI
^ S
>-
il
cj qj
c E
£ in
CO
253
-------
S
b
«
to
.a
0
1
I
£
Components of
Selected Remedy
'•o" £ c? ^2
R
§ g
-p'u 0,
c
_e
§
•a
S
&
<§.- fe"§ 111.
•S T3 DO .S 8. 5 n 1" 18 T3 JJ
il-iS=ilS,§^f S |
s^ E s-a.s-e^-a^ •
J£
ra
. ft-S' 5S>S o-o §=5
J25 2
a-l s§ 2 s^
o JS o
CD. O
I E &
S « M
§ 2
•S o
1
I
O
C 60
llillllll
"ra , _ ,
C
3
-2 ig
c
3
S o "n
01 - ?• -S
-> E > ^
tj "O r" '
5^ £^3
254
-------
Components of
Selted Remedy
Si
O °9
§2
0~ <9
•
•-
!^>!UIM
£"S
HI
"§"
-
CO os ^M .1?^ «i5 •"" ?• oj
fiilil&ff.
S
a, -a .
liiliJIlt!
B.MD,OMiaScw2
1
O
s
o
"S
60
c
•c
3
s 1
06
E 2
v 5 -n
611
§
8
o
o
o
!!!!?
Soil, sediment, debris,
1
•o
c
ra
O
contaminated with
VOCs including
•a
c
ro
w"
^
w"
K
u
i
1
xylenes; other organics
•§
ra
^c
'x
_o
^
.S
•a
3
"3
^C
pesticides such as DDT;
metals including
•a
c
«
e
3
u
j:
u
_u~
ra
1-1
CJ
j:
4-1
O
T3
B
CO
S
_«J
inorganics
B
-------
§0 _
O S?
003
in o -s
81
2-i
IS
EH «ss i a-
Sills!£
•s s
Q.
l^g
a, K 5
S S S3 S c £?
w X 3 1 g a
•S in -2 *J S J-g
O _ g cu co o^
a, d. Q > cu o
w
o
t>
3C ^=i
5S
CO
.§ S g 'g »
I 2 o S 3
•* • • " EC-a
o S «
j?l
e -a 8
I S S
is3!
'S. S
g13
1 SI'i2
a £.* e
«
I ill
18 •§
<*>3
tf a 8
- s a s
•5.S- g, g 5
e.2
B "
o
a .s
e-
o
1C
I
£?
"^
S?
'S:
$ CO
S e
? s
256
-------
O
Q.
3
I
u
r 8
tp x;
c S
II
o
II
|3a
5 ft,
•g a1
S=5
C 3
«
§ .a
^ §
ap
2
.52
J
I
o
"8
tc
o
1
TO
^C
If
81
S 2
5-6
s
£
I
ra
B
E
257
-------
i'SS
S\
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
!U
3
D.
to
O
IU
IS
a
!0
I
No furth
a
ex
aj
o
-
.23
§
CO Q.
'
.
i
| "S^^a^g agfiSalt
S'2''^'-o§8SSE
'^•zsaegssBssB
toowojcoOoOcooc
.503
T3 ... o
t/3 o
> ±i 0
V BO
60 .C
S C
o .2
&
s
8 8-
.
to £ iS — CTCCO vO «
r-H D 5 WUtOb O •-'
258
-------
e
S
a
C "a a
C !1 5
1
D.
p
1
a
Components of
Selected Remedy
1
"5
S
c/l
g
sat/Problem
X
£
£§
|o|
IJJ
I
S
£
•* S o -
S S £• 0.3
"> IB c ?r s
g _ c — " |^§
-------
u
o-S
i!
e *
•a
•a I '& I
3=5
•RT>
CS
.-a -a
8 J
^-^
•> « "g o ~
II s.t-g
s v—' CO ^^ CO
S
"8
tn
I
be
s.s
"5 c
sg i^
fc H
LH O\ (A
Ho"
_c
"5
S
c
Eg «3
02 £S
260
-------
J8
§
O
a
3
I
G
Components of
Selected Remedy
.
w pj
o
'R
S
w
OS
1 s -a S ,3
°"
.
-
-a
*g
il
'
!J!E
1 "S ~
--x35 ^H
o
'I
£^
I 1
1 E.y
- 2 *-
13 o %
t/iow
UH
o
IN
—
O ^
0 3
«
o I "
s ^^ffl
°1 g
fo
to
liq
te
tm
ed o
vati
in
it
nsta
includes inlling
ells, followed by offsi
liquids and onsite tre
g drumm
on; exca
soil in o
mpora
cti
quids; excava
offsite destructio
ng contaminated
s-gt
^|Ig&
"iliii
MSiSS
Hlill
«s g § § I
"3.13 s-a S2
•g 8 ^ | -g ^
n g S o S c
aq
liq
co
dis
the
sou
cap.
inte
onsi
**> e
•R |
lla^a?
oo" 3 "» —r w '3
l^3i § S^T
u 1.5 S S 9 8 g .5 -3 Ja
^ n r«a § u 8. S 6. -2 E 'S
SlilllllJIl
CM
5 *
fe 1 I
1 la §
K £K S
261
-------
U
o.
3
C
0
S3 E
e «J
u a;
ii
ii
u#
jy
S
&
eg
1
A
CO
I
o
I
a
-
•S -
1
o >
S-8
J3
S
-a
•r "S -C
E T3 ^ U
•S a| S
^.li»
ll-ll
-i&'9
o
c/i
SB .2
cx -a
o
1
!l
D. Z
s 1
t,
ClH
g 2
262
-------
si
II 111
£
•c bo
•- c
.« ^ TJ
vr.a-e
sr « « •
$
.
i2 '0
c 5
l§l|9
3.2 p .a I *
•a E-I -a u M
3
2
II
aisi II
o
O
IE I §
£<§g I I
263
-------
ss
CJ
o
o
o.
ss e
c w
u c£
ll
•a
o
o
o
i si
1
§ 5
II
3 2
**
e .a
.°
CO ffJ
ll
a 1
1 s
•Sg
2 5
"§£
2 2
CA C
K:§
,Q «1
CQ
> y)
sl
0-5
ia
^' g
2.2
^3
w fO
t-i en
£^
^ s
pecific goa
•cinogenic
Chemical-s
include cai
3
1
o
¥
<*•§
W CQ
l!
CO g
2 0
. M
b& o
e^
Is
ti
O j«
^ 5
Jl
f 8.
pentachlor
Chemical-s
ol
rt -a
•g-o
la
""S1
U
^a
.S o
"cj 'O
ca u
0 S
•S3
il
1
a
o
o
o
CO
V
•a
s
1
W
1
CO
.0
.a
•a
E
E
1
^
c
&
-«1
C 2
&^
o •&
O CO
5^
99% remoi
contaminai
O
&
I
f
1
U
m .
01 C?
IS
•;*
•S 3
1«
JK
s /->
&d
|g
l^
13 3
^
3 0
a1"
I'S
J2 i
U
-•g
li
-§
^s
"> ^C?
w 3 u
P o S
r- t/> ^-'
WJ 4~l "Q fl
•a co 3 .y
— -S "3 fl
M e.l S,
g i " •*
.1 8'
flj ?
w U
1
!.§•§
g g,
ro '5
nS -i
264
-------
8 g
o g
52 c
I
WS
I
§
265
-------
u
is e
£2
ll
o
o
o
in
V)
•ill
e 5 S x "t? ra 01
E 1) g &*> £
oj 5-3 o c .52 5 t-
L. U y c C O to
o
o
o
o " a S tC o
S^l Ei-il
co -—' S K r-i ao>—'
Soil, sediment, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes; other organics
•o
c
ro
M
C*
S
•a
_3
T3
_e
eo
_c
^
_3
13
_c
w
2
01
arsenic, chromium, and
•o
M
(U
U o
53 2
e
E
266
-------
£•« S3
O C w
£ ™ rg
els
CU d< ^
in co «
a o o
J/
li
£
C
C
n
(!_
L
V
3
£
1 -at
Decision Sumi
Components
Selected Rem
•8
1
orf cu
e
S •§
^ ^*
t^ cu
S
—
IS
8
IX
i>
CO
Ei
J3
t~
•& §
I^'l
2C§1
a |s"S
33 ^ .1 1
w rt
c
.2
00
Si
w 2
^•f S
0 S 0
t» 5 w
OJ
3
1
"H.
a,
RJ
o
^
o
1
c
ii
•s-0
'? §
££
(U W
p •—
QJ P
<- QJ
C w
o rt
'S e
CO O
*J g"
^S
5 "5
•II
_CJ
2
u
ll
Z co
u
c
o
Z
u
*-
b.I8
iHi
i§i§
£566
t^s
Contaminated
Aquifer
09/28/90
g
O
-5
o
o
o
v»
"8
tn
o
c
S .
00 C ^
CM 'c « y
as £ s (2
T3 C
. u
§ ^2
2»
* S
S-a
nj ro
S S
Ula
e w c
i/)
(N
'3
-
Ca
-------
o
O,
•53
re
al
te
ate/
atu
e
Si
R
£
o
•a
S
1
« '
&
t-
s
i-g o-
o
U5 (Q
'3 Ji
-
ii!
y.s a
by
mus C
yst
GW
zatio the wa
rry, owed
wat Calm
nent inage
rry; treating
n of
, follo
te to
t drai
; t
I-g
JS g
2 5
.§«
... 60
^ c
u -c
K 2
u-a
IE
—-" "^
c
cd
Ca
prior to discharge
of dewatering we
treated discharge
Continued acid neutraliza
the dewatered West Qua
discharge of the treated
construction of a perman
the dewatered West Qua
1
O
flff 1411
'S I ja I S 1 a
is = 3 S -3 a S
£S«£-g£-£o
1/3 S-E e M^-a-S
"§|.§ J9".s|'|3
s i Sil-i-s o I
5 8 o-S-.s g.s 5
|
!!<
268
-------
s <£
CO O
•I
1
o
o
O u
*w TO «3 '^ t_i
Sllll
I s
5 u
2
M
"§£
P =
C &
o <
S £
269
-------
O
D.
3
u
£3 E
1
5J&I
o
S| "He?
00 ** " •-
I
ll
c
b
s<
§ 5
8
o> 5.
o
o
-S
r-i 03
go
&
^. e c
a 2 %
c:
-• c _
T3 '£3 d- J^
§ 1 8 | § I
I u S ™ 1
(XI'M £ S „
C C ^ "
•a o
o /-^ o .S
10 ™ o\ -a
e-
S"§1
E
-------
u
s
_
111 I
O
O ,-^
O r=
o
o
o
H ^
e s ji B s
8 S>
1
"
g e •• a
i CO 5 tin < O r-1
271
-------
Dat
it
ta
Si
R
Si
E
"B.
§80
'*£«
ilsB s
0 ^ ca
CO « 01 TS
c.gppl
•s-s Site S.y-6
11 IE.1!|
> u.S m - « e-l
al'S^ will
lfiv*s>Scio.i"
ON D- u o* DJ w ra .5
U-i
1
B »
— .S -a
- CO C. C OJ
s B c w .a
QJ O C !«
S .1 S. ff e g
•i'^ttg
l-i (3 —- M tT U
"° « 'a S S _
•S § -a ^ 1
c o 4-1 rt co
S 2 c „. c 53
C P IP 60 Q g
Ill'ifl
iSSIll!
Illitii
i^^-o i^-g
>< n G 0 (U C
O
w
a
I'SS'S
lltfrf
.° c°5 S S
c > c •=> e
"S l-ol-o
I *jj S 1 S
llplll
llllll!
,-a
7, >-
II
S K
o
8 '« °
«
|i
£ 5 U2
.
0 rl
as
C *J
oj o
•p a.
1) IN
•S 5;
fi o
•
"oi vis S « "u .S
o
Ov
272
-------
§•'
I
£ g-S'S 1 8.S.S
S •§ s | £ | .8 S
I1
•g
tc
o
l-slll
.
,3 P "S 2 'E
^ o 'H'S "S «
O > a .S a S
'S .S
> T3
BO CO .t
I-§ E
'2 '0 -o
c
.5
CL,
|8 3
£g S
IS 3
8
c ^
'S «
1 s
I?
>> ™
¥> S
g J
&
TJ
S
1
1
g
&
?j
o
•a
c
(S
273
-------
eg
.1
o
"8
o
•S S
g^
a. 3 .H
&I
S gj^§
„ "°
_, CJ ^3
s3lS|
S -'C w5,_,
l^d =ru
S2 bbS O b»2
co 3 *—•' «-< 3 ^-^
•8
s a^
I 'i w VM .
.siilt!
ra CL>
*"
|S||1.
S^l 8«
t: u « u
o w| fc"S
C S?^3 § „
..GcjSc ». ™ w - — — N.
a '3 .ti '3 aj o !-• * o co -c 53 t>o
ll?!! HiUli!
w U Ol
c -a i.
o
•8
IB
O
W u
"" J=
U -S «
O« n "S
~ = -2 -2
2 -a
S "°
?2 co
5^ c 12 "5 "0 ^ E
IllBI'Ill
g
"S
CO
8.1
Sg
c"c£-S'S-So-ii««
illg-sJiffigli
I^II^lliliSs
6.s£3ss.§^g,sS?
£§1318121
« 2 ^
•s al-SS
13 QJ W "S *5
III 2-|
•s* I
« c E
-s-e§
5. D-d
B M *O
3 -a G
a. co co
o
S -a
co 3
c 73
E-S
T3
'0 a,
l§
I
274
-------
"5 "g a
n
c S «
g -ES
,-
0
o
o,
3
C
S
0
Components of
Selected Remedy
s
u
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
o
°eo
OJ
Pfi
"8
2 "8 « 5 | 2
SS b oj T3 TH
— c >2 s 8 4j
i 1 Q 1 1 ^
-c §0 2i^ 8
CJ £j CS H U CX
Consolidating sludge adjacent to the basins with
sludge in the basins and containing the sludge
and any excavated contaminated soil with a
vegetative soil cover; hydraulically containing
GW with a slurry wall or sheet pilings
constructed around the perimeter of basin area;
pumping GW to maintain an inward hydraulic
gradient across the slurry wall; treating GW
onsite, either at the CERCLA Wastewater
Treatment System or at a separate onsite
treatment facility to remove organic and
inorganic contaminants; and GW monitoring
r-l
"R
§ ^
If
O "^
5 ~S -o
u -S e*> 52 - S
•a -| S E .a —
f-aPi1
bO CQ .S •" c"
•a c sft oo b
2 •— « CJ c 3
"« § "S 'S "3 *S
^ C (X) w "o fc-
O O 1— i QJ c- J2
WUOCL.SU
O
U
c -
18 1"
p J g
s — — 5s
>> g 12 o
•* S OJ e 3
8f |-s
^•g S3 »
« c o ^
mi
8
c ^
2*— co £7*
c M S
!§ 1 o
>> S "2 S?
-* g !U O
•S 8 1 "8 ^ -S
VO PH <, tin O IN
CO
275
-------
.!
£
HI
•s
§ S II |
•2 BO K, «. a
3
i
•S
I -s 1 1 -s a"
i
g sjg
tl "tfl O
o
83
3 c
Iiill
o c o ^ E
« -a 3 o
Sf S3 1 i
O 6..S u
o
1/3
1 II
t>0
o .5 £ J3 _
llfffl
llsi^l
.E fc O .3 _>..«
§1
8.1 o u;
=> « •'S e
^ C L4 *^
I/) B ^
A a ^ 2
8
2
E
ll
•S .1 1 1
nil
•§
o
Ov
1
O
276
-------
_
W
Components of
Selected Redy
,LJ
I
o
o
c c =5 E -
i> '~ 3 -5 "^
Ifl8.3
i*a-§£
i
s§ s
o« |5 x
'E " ^
K 2
o ^3
o
CO
-
of
l
<20 mg/kg), followed by offsite disposal
(contingent on EPA approval) of the removed
arsenic-contaminated soil, and revegetation; SW
monitoring; and implementing institutional
controls including land and access restrictions
"8
1C
1
.-§
|
1
— 1
'5 !2
t)5 a
•v
U
§
^
CO
a
277
-------
t- "^3 ^
p c tS
!> CO o
e 2 .-
B '5.3
I30
oa
D.
3
B
S
QJ
u
•*
^ X
°^
ss e
S c v> CJ S
jalgS-
53 1 ° S>
~ Q W bfc 3
_ r i ^i
D- — W 3 rj
E= s "> S
11 111
llJBS
B
10 a ..
§>! 1°
2 0 'S
3 O en
a £-5 1
•B _ § "
gleg
0 S .., u
5 - ? 13
S "3 u c
^ «• .. s
"S-rfSl s
w E 10 " O
c 3 > *a 'a
S 3 > tn u
g B° S -S fa
g 'S.v2 g1 §
CH dj ^ .—
" 'fi 3 c i>
l.^2M
fflftfl
•&.S S .E -a
EO 43 3
3 "3 « •§ "3
*-* X •-- C r"
O. H
1 I 60
a s,.s
a •& §
s Jri
i ^&
"7^ .S C ^
&< s « ^
< U < S i2
0^
o
o^
^
M
s^
o
§
O 4-1 2
-. c ^ . .
ti S *P ° Q1
ST M 'P in" ^
O^ CU C r-4 C4J
I-H" rv P CO O
V» 0? ? W fci
-rt ^-i
(U 5 O
3 r — i
•O elj « ^
"P hrt *S J£3 ^
•Nil ^
•a i c"3 u "
§ a 1 c'S 2
bo v ui aj
a10 c £ 83
•3 *-i •— > 3 *C
1 § fill b
S « 'a * ^ g
"o 5 .S ^- = E ve
La * g g'S 8»
^ 8 8 H-&S o
§j S B E -g E 2
8* i 3 2 B '="
< S 2 D. i! 3 «
Consolidating soil and asbestos ores within the
tailing pile; grading and revegetating tailing
pile; diverting SW away from the tailing pile;
improving an existing sediment trapping dam by
constructing a concrete spillway; dismanding
the mill building; paving the mill access road;
and implementing engineering controls,
institutional controls including deed restrictions,
and site access restrictions including fencing
T3
(U
C3
I
on
O
z
f
">
?•
a
CO
B
1
2
c S
o 2
U (n
:> i!
& -g
C/3 (0
S c°|
8 =a „
•* S =
3 S c -a
« < i o S
SS, 5 ss -S* °^ -r
00 ^^ O j^ \ ti*
a «r s w a
JO C ^ -o \ T3
OS « c Os C
OS < co o CM
*-}
OO ^— N
_. w c ^
§ E ^ £ g
£ 8 H S ^
SJ s. S ^ S.
»-i u
£13 n rt -S
= 'c 2 V|»R
^ nlT. O "cO S
^ ^ 0 « o ^
s i-i M bo
« G S
2 |
10 •-
U '0
m
8 E _
B •-- o "H
« . .2 0s E
^S i | s
a --^ -i S \ ^
£ a £ < o S
278
-------
1
CO
ffi
35
o « 1
£ *<§
c.3s
OH jTi
fao
J2
§M
O
o.
3
C
CO
OJ
U
u^ >-
°-s
a E
C QJ
| ^
S *a
11
3j
u
E
3
"o
>
a
w
CO
5
E
V
S
2
ex
JB
S
^ §
|a'|
f il
^ CO OJ
2 c c
55 SP S
cyj pj
e
_o
*5o
I
o
R
§
v£>
si
»ft
s Jn
:s § 2
.» .. — K .73 u •>
.afal.gsli
"512111 a
c o -3 ^ *n S ra
x "2 -
U C bo
<-i 3
S *'
.S -6 g
o
15-a
, T3 ui ^ "S
!l'li
r c S S .S
: | K "I S
I | I 'S
^ U3 tl _._„ O
M S .2 ™
C M"° >"
O C 0) >
•a 'a .a w
"il^
o " sa
W O
CO
c
E
•a ^3 w
S ^ | 3
E^l o
S I 1 ^ I
Hill
Qj c cj o .£
^ 8 '2 =6 •§
tO [/) O CO .£
§
279
-------
1
o
o,
Ctf
1
'S .
3 .S o
'0
s
c
«
5-
boe
•S"S
8 j
16 1
§ 8 s
">" rn" 5j '
CS 00 li
SUB
S&8"
lli
o
1
fc
'2 13
1
< 2
a -a v v * > c a a
I a-S-S-So^mSS
at'
1
o
H D~ "ffl
aj s
280
-------
-S3
§
O
a,
3
C
u
&T3
I!
i
o
1.S
=
u >
—
BlP'i
* 1-^1
is ca « H ^
llgll
60
C
OT
1|
« C
.5 5
J< S
I
i
281
-------
1
B
c7
j
13
1
ti
c -o a
?i«
S "cL J3J
£
J2
8
o
n.
°
Components of
Selected Remedy
* |
8 J
fe «
V)
$
QJ
!
(i
•^
aj
C
J3
P
\ c
S .2
jT j[ a '§
r? QJ
2 X 3 5
S g 1*8
M S C C
^ ft 60 g
to oj
c
o
"So
S
i/C C! s-< \ o f*>
£ flf o S
«• = 0 co~ n
s >& s «i y
, C ™ T3
•S °~ "8 S"B §-S
a ~% ii .S t! " 'a '? »?
2?5
U »•§ «"S »«? ll"
Sj3«aK.SSl?EE
SS^«g aa S SJ2T3.2
S-S-c = ?'3v? -^SSE
S3!u"S-§2'SSl^g
^ M"»J^ o uTS a.(8.e
-^"illsScI^^
slSlggg^g-ag1
5'8>I>|§8-87'0S.IS
Ii;lliisli1
QJ 60 T3
Excavation and onsite incineration of soil;
dismantling of contaminated portions of
buildings and, if necessary, repairing those
buildings where the removal activities may
affect their structural integrity; onsite
incineration of contaminated concrete building
structures or offsite disposal at a RCRA Subtitl
C-permitted hazardous waste facility, dependin
on volume; analysis of ash from the incinerate
materials prior to onsite disposal if ash meets
cleanup goals or offsite disposal if ash remains
contaminated; and GW monitoring
M U S
^ e S 3
>>,-^ O 0 «
... r= vo c y
| 8 *- S g
ON ^-' r-i *— ' «
«
2 £
PM
ll'Sli
ISl'-s
e SR 60
"° -S u -a C
C e .-- '"^
« cc C 'u 'S
*-J 03 "C 3
1 o E? Si
t/5 u o O..S
_£-
«J QJ 'G
S 2 £
o fe
TO *n ,— i
S So
j*i a, 'a o
(n C3 CJ\
^ ^2 ^
S S O O Os 1/1
H, > BH (i, O rH
0
*• !$
9. o e
| g _ | | §
llf §ll|
o B, g mn><2
«» S 5 vi ii 8 E
13 M — .
l = g
S 4J cij
•" T3 M
a! Q
* S 73
lii
•o ™ \
C H IX>
2 Q 3
« K in
°- U
c 2 H
S-S _-
°2~bO^
^ c = »
5 0 in E
Pumping and onsite treatment of GW using air
stripping to remove VOCs; discharging the
treated water onsite to infiltration trenches,
including one trench located upgradient to
facilitate flushing of secondary contaminant
sources; confirmation soil sampling;
investigating deep aquifer contamination for
possible remediation; and implementing
institutional controls
"S
S
U
S.
V5
1
€
5 w"
"S ^
a «u
c .5 n
11°
S U T3
c c d
8 « "
•a. Q W~
> O U
O > H
.y
C/l
'So &•
3 -
< u
yl >^r 03
•?£ ^ s
a S 2 ^
„ S S (M
C C T3 V. ,j
O V C ON to
u, U b o ^H
o
'""'
282
-------
>
t3 T3 a
o c g
> CO O
sis
QJ Cl* «
—
0,
7
c
CO
D
of
a E
S c<
!l
li>
u3
tu
E
3
> "3
* >
1 CU
1
2
1
K
^
> S
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Dat(
Remedial Actk
E
.O
'So
OJ
rt
n
10"
CO
vO
t»
E
rial with concentratio
CU
to
3
.
•£
«J
ca
ex
e
•a
CU
c
'g
•a
B
ft
1
~n
BO
E
•a
to
."9
c!
**i
u
g
ID
—
.2
QJ
CO
1
1
"g
CO
1
E
i»
Silver Mountail
0
S
8 C
£i
E u-.
O O
"O "cu
S g
S3.S
e.*
£'?
66 g
e g
O 0
O _
tN ra
A T3
.a S
C-
"S
O CO
•a c
c -s
« g;
BO CO
.S U
"1 J3
^ CO
BO-g
>> ffi
J=> CO
15 e
Is
1. "2
ex S
SB
js 8
•si
_ 00
c
cu -r
*§
•5 s
1 8
ex
_ E
1-i
TO
= c
o .E
^ E
,0
'c
u
^^
5 I3
"§1
ca u
d c
's '«
2 "3
§1
1
tu"
B
S
60
-*
•Jb
S
A
tu
3
1
Ui
O
b
ca
x;
'?
>
V)
CO
•c
cu
1
•g
nd consolidat
ca
ex
r^
•S
^2
"C
s
CO
ly occurring)
S
3
CO
£,
•s
5-Acre Abando
9
c« S
w ^y
lie
III
5
o
^^^
— 0) OJ
111
P " T3
Jll «
5^ co gJ
gl^
•^ x
•8=3 §
1 £ =
£85
cu
-a " tu
c » E
to 5;
., « CO
JJ ex
e ex BO
a D -S
2 w ~*
E to 2
^.s
il^
c ex ca
1 &•*
2 S
to c 3
lit
til
H:E g
S ra «
BO >
X c ?
co .S —
""be
^ 1 -S
0 S E
w t- CO
er inorganics
g cyanide
!i
"9 Ti
C c
co .E
Mine Dump
03/27/90
CA
§
ng detects concentrat
g standards set for
154 ug/1 (based on a
monitori
exceedin
cyanide
5
O
^r 'w
-£- B
ex §
ex -a
S 3
W C
LH "C «
a B §
CO •- •-
5 60 0
ill
.S tu c
alternate an
; and implem
:luding deed
g B? £
CO E —
£ 2 "1
= 'S *3
^3 o S
S E 8
"to
E
E
tc
J_l
\O « E -rt
^*^ 5fl 2 ^3
o "C ^ 2
"S i, D. 60
Slli
1 §^-§
•?T °fi
B2=o
|§^s
I'Sl 2
•O tfl
™ S «•-
S-s-s
l^ll
ex
S
QJ
JT
-S
s
cu
•5
0
So
•8
CU
•S
p
U_i
>o~
K
o"
al contaminant goals
Individui
U— 1
O
c
o
€
s
"o
CA
OJ
"w
C
O
1
s.
•a
c
CO
c
o
1
S
X
w
«*)
•^
o
8
J8
CA
•a
1
lo
13
3
tyi
Teledyne Wah
o
E
ex
E
'£
.S
.—
Ic
£
"S
ta
1
CA
O
E
K
1
ra
.E
i
VI
^
aj
1
o
1-
XJ
CJ
_o
"o
>4_l
oT
tX)
*o
3
"u3
cu
bo
T3
3
S
•S
'?
"S
CO
E
2
E
O
CJ
X
1
<2
60
B
CO
U
^^
s
I 1
i s
T3
action; the selected
will attain Federal an
lARs
3 x3
cu In tu
£ E to
2i i! «
E
T3
C
_co
Oj
^
CO
r2
"5
cA
T3
OJ
w
S.
;; and metals
g chromium,
d zirconium;
ioactive
S E E -0
•g ^ CO g
CO 3 -rT ^H
sill
^J
E
(TWCA), OR
Active Metal
Production Pla
t/a
lo
tu
to
12/28/89
283
-------
SECTION IV
RECORDS OF DECISION SUMMARY TABLE
FY 1982-1989
The FY 1982-1989 Record of Decision Summary Table provides an overview of site
problems, selected remedies, cleanup criteria and estimated costs provided in the
RODs signed between FY 1982-1989. The table is presented by Region, in
alphabetical order according to the site name.
-------
I O v> <—> f V) •
o
o >
ai
§ H
2 5.
s •§
a S
Sbti u
I »s
SI I
o
ftf
^
'I 60
2 §
'e-s
S 8'5^
if ;
M * B'S
•o -p •- .9
S s S ^
•8
08
I
CO
g«
r-i
III
g 1C O
C - "" -
jj ^ =3 f 'Z
'S S B-g
11111 °
« « u 1 c E
« B ^2 * O S
Ss ^-s'g b
§ § _a « g c
"| e^ til
1
O t/1
Pll
8P-2
TD "ca
C 2
10
=3 •£ 3 "° I
v 'C *C C £
oS f a, S S
.S
I
Il
§-g
ill
o S a
U. £ UH
287
-------
S
r-. °
s 8.1
'ass
I
s
«£.§
T3 TJ gf
sl °
o
d
60
'I
o
in
to
* o
to~ "I
1 i»S
!
a
c
o
•55
y_i
I
&f eo
yi
•o ^
a ^ E
M ^^
8 1
to
5f
288
-------
8
m S-
3.3
alls
1
o
•p 60 C
£ .S S
-------
O
I'
§
u
>,
°1
S3 E
gS
11
33
"° .—
eg £
O Us
Z o. .,13 -
u. c IT nj
S 3 S£ g>8
£>•£ 1st
vl s ™ *-°
1 . . TJ .£ g S
> — - c "5 R 03
J '5 a " % «§
•3 S bo2 ^ 3
« -S .S c v, J3
c S S, o o 3
O 03 Q. *£3 HA ^
I-S'S a e «
w E « •? ^ -S
S|-al8a
llflli
§ o 3 ^ .,:=
u c 7. c S?-a
5 o S o e cs
> 'a B 'o S 03
3 &S £-2 g S
11 mil
-
m S
r-l .ti
sir
CO
1
5
1
IS
•o
I
2
•o
l
1
1
O
fe- S S 2 §
I 5 -8 ^ S .a
_
.O
I
I
1 I
to
290
-------
1 = 1
£ «6
e 2 S
P°
J!
^
C
C
£
U
41
3
S
cision Summarv
s
C-
»j..j
^
!
CO
S.
I
£
•>
•sl"
i §
S «
I"S
Is
33
O bo (U 9?
m. °. .S E o o .S E O
pf N TJ 2 S 0 0 -3 5 -
8 3 S f § ? £ §- § § 3
rf or Sr Z £ ! »"&fc
sss-lai ssS-Sl
S eel S '^ §
8 .* I S x e
C x, P s -a w
J3 60 5 EC"
E "5 S E «
y — _, y ai 'E
311 S " 3
c co w > -3 -a
8 A b?^l
^ u M .
o -a x, . <5 on
S S <* s« ri c>
.s Jj E ^ y 5
"° a o bb* 5
O « O £ ^^ f-t
11 A § 1 S
S - -a 2 - | J2
a s J A -g s -a
2r^
O >n
i»{ S
3 j= C S E c -a
5 « ™ 8 S
.rlsn
liSl-8
oo u g--a u
-
"J3 'P "o 2
Ee"
= 2 ro g5 u
S C „-;•= C
^ O -— ^ O
>- u 2 ^ g
S u oj o E?
0 'S E .S ^
<
x"
1 s
I 1
T3 \
C g w
3
0 S
O *
o /^ o *^
« 2 o i 5
31 £lg
5 "S -s
g^ ™ «
M * _M TJT
iJ *C °? .5 jj
"S§'3l2!8n v n u
*~" ?5 ^« ^ ft ^^ ?• S"
QS£2uO"3o ,r
^of ^gSg^^jOfei
S«lSlll^l
|.|lj5|f || J
^iislllll
C 66
M C
2 oj •—
1 * i -e
E _ vu, o-
2 S o w
g - e •§ "g
"o « P e" w
§iil§
"C 03 O ^^ O
ra 3 u & bO
11* ?«
liHS
•o 5 .2 w
"2 4J £ U 0
e oo1*" s -a
ra *o _r o w
e — 3 ° .S «
o « j= a e g-
'a -a ™ o s E
g e c « | g
« ra 8 e 8
w S JS •§ -a §
**1
^i
||I
WO 3
35
ai .ii
1 -ai
•3 j: c a
" •is n w
t3 '5 .60
sv-8il
»j- £ S S 3
60 M 60 Ti
•§.S g^^.S-o
— E •= „ <5
"lefi-i-3
s c X -n « -a
£ 8 £ J i S
if -t
5 1
1 1 1
§ irf
§ < •§ s
C 5 C R M
*~ A *« O »-*
1
S
*
oj JS
M 9
"S a
TS o.
*!
al
requiremen
Individual c
S
B.
M
I
> S E
291
-------
eg
is
u
•at
«
g-8
o
o
CO .
o i
o *•
t^ iJ
fc~§
fc
•- p-
_ ™ «
= £?
o -
-s c >
S ' « -S I
si & 2 «
.
II5HJ
H u ra « -o -D
O *S
m 2
c >
811
111
18 g rt
3-o a
SB*
„ u 2
po
G
TC
cor
cancer risk
Si
^•3,
'S. e
dj w
u
'is
00
•5-5 e
C/5 W5 CJ
'8'8 |
•82 g
5»1
O nl Xi
•3-6'S
S
«
^•E
o > S
2
01
III
s"«?
(-H (U C
£&l
I
Tf
S
ja
•6 c
~z Si
£
£•
5
u a 1 S § _-
i^ c H ri _Q *n
i^dilill
M-'~ cSs-^P-
; •a -- E .g s & S
in
in
«
s
6
8
2
o
1
•o
'S
3
S
292
-------
o
a.
I
I
§.
-C fTf
^^ cj
•O o"
111
2"o
G -S C
O yj QJ
.fa o S'
•2 > Js
8.1
st
1
"8
1C
•§.
o
"S-fl
> -p 3
O S „-
|-|
.1 S
60
.S
"
o
K (A
$ s
> 1
« c
^ E
CO '
I s
.S ,0
00 CO
.5 "?
a o
jf S
I
o
If
S
w
2
I
o
293
-------
•a £
o
a.
3
Components of
Selected Remedy
o
o
o
§
nr /""\
1 s
ij
~\t
o .5
O T3
O CU
E 8
"S 5 S -g 8 S j»
M U ^ ffl 'c « g
= -o -S w g^ a 5
3 c -g U £? < j=
tn CO > CX O CLH Q-
X. j_i
ON w
O T-H
88
. . =? 0
. .
o o
0 0 .ti
vO CO 0,
8
-
0 S
-
o\
o c
w
1
CO
la,
3
if>
^
cu
^> \
5 »
•(3 3
.Su>
^3 "
s 1
x G
£ =5
II
T3 C
(U ™
00 =
•a p
_3 »
"w -&
N.S
C CO
'£,.£
11
_ c
5 8
5
12
'33
cu
•a
1
f
'I
1
(fl
S
1 1"
•* 1
T3 CJ
backgroun
•ad, and m
*Lt
3 ~
TD E"
a .2
§ E
> Q
s S
a -c
01 °
u
a &
Excavati
and sedi
and rev
over en
1
O
1 •- s
n3 T3
°-" I-S
on u o a
^ .§ j= 2?
0
5
cu
u
a
h
»
294
-------
O
a.
3
I
u
t
- cs
_
CN*
., o s! eo — u x
J2c"fj_,i,:c66
SSfeft^^^s
S b
•s-6-
§-ip^£
e >< a y ^ ..'
60 « .S .S
fi e c"S
H o £ S
in
\o
p
d
•*
o
ill
"
iflif^af
» fi ,. S -o :.- -S
ill
o
o
O
[1
^ Z
II
a « .-R
2 ri ^ C
1s^'5
S c^-g
•sis"-
CO M OJ \
II
U O J/J w
w a S TS
JS -a a e
T3 C tS 'S
c u c £-3
•o e
V.S-
il
O9
1
§
"Is?
% 3
I
_r c
Z&
a—
... •= "J u w » e
SI-.-9SS * "
.It 5 2-* 2
- ' 2 -5 -5 = »
S|8J?i8Sl
ll^tl§11
OKt-iB3.aJ5u
o sy £?
t/5 u > o
O
&
•a
§
o
295
-------
c«
"8
ls
§o o
. 2 2
'
.a o?
a. o
5f*IJ
* C 'u
: «g-K-8
^6 s s^sS«o
E-S.jQTioe-W'S S
8s
cs o
o
= •5
'
296
-------
s-o a
e a s
JJg
o.
3
§
O
O
'5o
cu
Bfi
8
to
I
PH
W
e
E
297
-------
u
Q.
I
8
"•f g 3-3 s-a ss^ e
S 3 <" 73 3 G J2 jgw-S •
iilsSli^l-
IE 3 jo n § H "? "i =5:
StoinHSSto^-'"?
3 ° u 'I ^ O -I
13- ts v a o 1-1 s
•R
o ,
> JE fl ^
^ ? 60 QJ "3 "^3
E 13 -S 3. 2 c
V QJ T3 ^ "u ™
e a 2" 3 U"
o >
I
1/3
a
60
_E
K
z
S 60 U •= M 60
P to E t-< in ± .5
.S =3 ~a •- < "S
e = E E a. =
•3
«
C/3 >
-s y
O S
I
3
Cfl
s
(^
CN
8 45
298
-------
•o S3
i
S
n
decision Summ
1-H
•8
1
1
M
fe
i
O C i£
^ ™ (S
els
dn
J2
O
o
ex
3
C
m
S
1
Components of
Selected Remedy
CLJ
3
£
s
V5
ra
^
Threat/Problem
^^g
llS|
ie§-si
.aSli
wall
c
.0
o ^^ Q _^
CN co o SS
S -a g- §
*S feS
"S
1C
'g
a,
V3
^J
O
Z
r _,
1
|
*w
W
•s
c
o
•a
™
"s
CA
^C
X!
4—1
tx>
c
'5.
S
a
•n
cu
c
I
M
O
13
C
GW, SW, and air
contaminated with
VOCs, inorganics a
heavy metals
E
a" £
s ^ §
£ £ I
0 0 =2
3« §°
§" "ra o" w
.•S 00 3
a co c
_.- eo - c
^ U i— i («
y^ *— ' fA \«_i
^3
u
<
c
1
ra
S
>
>
c
OJ
03
S
^
u
d treatment system
c
CO
Q.
a
3
Q.
O
"8
G
'0
s.
V)
Q
T3
C
GW, SW, and air
contaminated with
VOCs, inorganics, i
metals
X
z
S 5
g 3
£ ! s
§ 88
°o" "s o 2
8-f ?fl
a 3 s »
y
S u
4j°|
JS .
f I"S
S ^b =
s E m
S" 2
e~ O -a
Ife a
P ^
E| JiP
w S = ~°
Z S 5 g
•8 a
•sll
-S §
S g>g
li. .3 " w
o S-o-g
id onsite treatment
washing, or compc
osal; GW pump an
sstoration of wetlai
C _ Q, C
CO 1^ M
c S^-g
•a c.S w
2 -S S 3f
W Cd O fn
x §
S
0
O Q.
GO
I/) •—
5f
a
•
IS
•sl§
Teatment of soil \
or composting fol
pump and treatm
of wetlands
s <»5 §
urs
Excavation and o
aeration, soil was
by onsite disposal
POTW; and resto
S".sl£
| 'S, g U j.
a 'g § S"l JL
•isSUl?
° •£ S 3=3 -° 2
"§ -a a fi * | g
s 1 1 •§ 1 1 e
= a-s S 3 ?«
JS e^ § S^=
i J 1 'S S f '£
5 1 * | -g N
'§ |j 1 S -3 .2 J§
"§ e ? " | .§ |
(S 3 in .§> is « 5
lUil
S "3 -a 2, — co -a
5 -S g S 5 fi I
V
'I j-'e S?
^ i g S -g
1" £.is.§ h
oo-i •? -a e fe _
•3 .£> (0 C O 3 CO
Ill-Hi s'S
igaailii
0 £ &-s *° ».2
•a .2 -2 § oj ^& v
fc -o — " M 8 o "§
•§ S S =3 ^ e g
c - -a S e U" e
^ 8 § -| -g g I
= ? S o JS So £
|ll?*l3»
1 1 g 1 & > -g g
li^J&lll
w8J>2i3lgi
illli!
_- e o a y. T .E
•
-i '5 JS 11
0.
£
Q
u
.co
ti
C/5
o
CO
s
i
«
c
E
tx
,^
c
-------
c TS a
o c 5
£ a8
sis
i §*$
OH
"s
o
o
G.
3
c
s
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
§
'J? C
.So
l|f|
2 V 3 "«
u S S '"3
1 s s g
" M .2? £
w S
e
o
'5b
f^g §^!J
•llep!1^;^!
^^"^rsi^ §VO*^ r-W 0
Oin&.S^OiJd « oJ33
VH |
In-situ volatilization using carbon adsorption
treatment of the extracted vapor of VOC-
contaminated soil; excavation and onsite
incineration of the remaining contaminated s(
and backfilling of the excavated areas; GW
pumping and treatment using pretreatment fc
metals, followed by air stripping and vapor
phase carbon filtering with either onsite
discharge or reinjection, or both; removing ai
disposing sludge and debris; GW monitoring;
and implementation of deed and land use
restrictions
^ «
0 "T3 ™ ~
o- 's 2 — -S
" ^ "* ^"°
^ W ~ji
1 ~v ^ g1"? e
QJ (^ ^0 qj "O ^ -rt
"^ c.S^_3 "c"2
ij" 'i "3 o "§ w ™ i
•o* 2 "u • - "" oJ ip1 oo
•i § ~ ^ | «-3|
lEglllll
S — 3
111
— '"" T3 ^"
g
S^ °§
« S o oo § •-•
all ill
1
1
W5
o
2
Installation of carbon canister filters as a
temporary measure; and installation of a
permanent alternate water supply
1
1
VI
O
Z
5 F'T
"8 ^
« »
c -S w
1"B|
" -n e
W W ffl
g-S Ef
U ia 0
5 Ql
o > S
OC
•a
^ s
E_- *
CJ QJ CO
S 2 S -
& o § S
2^ S
58 o o 2? ^
Q CO Q O O '"*
Hi 1! Hal
S>S^ S ^ S-Sss S
2
c
SQJ
e •"
"i ° gs
2^25
C M J _
8*3!
^"S^s-s
°« . 2 I
•S 3 .2 c- —
S 2 STfg
u S -c S §
^gil
H = n 2 y
^ S S 8.2
RCRA capping; alternate water supply; and
institutional controls
•a
-------
JS
fli
2°
o o ™
o o 2
9"°" e
o ~ e
I
1 =
11 w
8 3
O > a
c a
!§
qj »-*
b
^
I I
1 b ~
O C3 -3
g 9.3
a g
OJ
2
S
I
o
§8 'a?
^5 tA
S'lS
I
1
so .5
.E E
•sg
S8
i 1
2 I
S 3
« -9 -a
oa
I
CO
g
oo M
00 B
301
-------
i
ll
!»
1 Record of Decision Svunmary Table
Components of
00
5
53
SH
&H
>
" *S CO
r?
W
03
^
i
Threat/Prot
e
•£•
<
!™
1
c
_o
'&
QJ
a
•" « C!
a, 2 "5
co E
O 2^ QJ
2
S
"S*
a!
CO
I
ff
•a
2
'c
o
co
O
£
C
o
•a
i
o
i
«4-l
O
e
CO
1
u
Removal of wastewater and sediment from
1
§.
u
o
2
c
.1
1
•a
c
10
1
O
c-
(0
p£j
C^ CO oj
00 C Jj
o& S U
\ ^ oo
O r^ QD
M
s
8
! II
S
t
s
!
o
o
I— (
A
o ^
pond and bog with regrading and covering
both areas and treatment of wastewater wil
discharge to stream; excavation of VOC
contaminated soil with onsite or offsite
JS e
•| W-
contaminated
VOCs, organic
metals
o3
&
5 §
2 o
•8
« a
e
incineration; evaluation of soil washing,
segregation, and other technologies to reduc
the volume of soil to be incinerated; compa
soil capping; fencing around site and work
areas; and evaluation of monitoring prograt
effectiveness
a
o
s~8?
ON QJ LH
**? D, §
<» ^ ?
1||
|1|
K 3 j
js i S
I^J
§*£ ™
ro w W
^ -S "
"u !pj
c eu
5 §1
O J3 3
60
C
GW pumping and treatment using air stripp
H2O2-UV photolysis oxidation, and carbon
adsorption and reinjection; brook sediment
c
c
12, •-
O ^
0.&
A
o 'S ™
Sediment and
contaminated '
VOCs includinj
B-
ra
u
U
N
o
1
ll
l/> W
Si
a
|
S -J3 u
|| «
•S °" •§
•|g-s
6 a-S
•ta a 1
<0 C/3 S
60 wl •>
C *H ^
w S iS
GW pump and treatment using existing air
stripping facilities with reinjection to the
aquifer
is
I
o
•£
'5 w
1 H
GW contamina
VOCs includinj
and PCE
T3-
13
E
-3
CU
5
n 2
CN
§
i
00 —
si
>,
in
"S
CO
3
s
^ ^
\ s
60 u
O cj^
vO
00
&
CO
^ £
302
-------
c -a a
o e - &
.5 M ? '-3 '3
s :§ 8 s IS
. 3
5 c
^a|s|
ll-ll
*-J nj ro
Hill
'2 - ° e a
•S1£-S §
.s -S -a s -
I s 111
0 si =2 2 !>
•a c * •=- a
SS.5P1 8
ll
l
I.. ll
eo o > co
"a;
S3 Si
^ l£ I
§.3
N D,
cT tfl ty
'
.s «
7" >,
U (0
0 ^
u «
QJ
£ n
!§
if
£o
u K
I
S
•a
"
S"§
a s g- « h
n _ e », s
s
s S
•»•" r<
1 "
<-> c
o 5
u -a
E =3 !a w -55
1
O
o
'0 o M
" "
ail
S
(U
ft w"
E «
w v£>
(2-S
X
a
to
'x
II
n C
^ I
ll
•S
C 00
.1-1
00 O
? J2
£ -
Igl^l
to ,_,
^ 2
c u
CO t^
li
1°
™ O
K ^.
u in
111
8-g
e «
ll1
111
U"« c
£ S|
E c 2
|| §
MAD
a S »
•8 S"S
s ij:
S " '3
ill
I"!
^•ii
"SSI
18 a §
U-T3 O
§ S-J
i .s -i
III
l
gf
00
SI S
E « _
M
303
-------
•si-
ll
c
o
I
o
s.
o\
**"!£
o a sfc
a ^-is g 3 w
£ £*3 So^
-« g-a8.
e ^^ •§ s'S1" v -
f " 2 . aw Jj B«CO
_d«^rlij#
ySH-S «l*^
ss
E.I S-S1
0
iiilliii
u5u>-22oB.£
ii
I
•8
ts
I
o
CO
M
I
•a
1 oo
o
Z
as s 2 as
U5 3
£f'S.
1
Ii|i|
es to o o >
o
QJ
304
-------
•8*
a E
a
_c
s
c
-------
CTS a
oca
£ «Q
gls
& O, 08
JG(3 o
W5
1
O
Q.
3
C
S
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
t
:a
en
03
<:
i
S
o
Ui
a,
>
g
S
£§
ll°'l
™ C" P —
2 C S «
.SSI'S
">£.§>§
w ^
c
o
'5o
D
rt
§ g |
sSf s
5&I S
U
*c * X
3 IS g
a r|«3 S
S -1 § 9 ^
a § &5-S
a) ro co 5 w
2 w 0 8>
W fa ~ ^ tp
log "3. IJ "8
=§ 5 1 8 1 1
^§§2S!
T3
^ «
ility testing and consolidation of
e wastes and pumping contents ol
>ins and sump into storage tanks;
testing of samples to determine
te treatment or disposal methods;
ng wastes for offsite treatment or
as appropriate
•Q js 5 ~a .S 'e -
O -rt J3 r) U 5-2
|g.jfl.|li
1 1 g s a i t
U cj *j ca nj £3 "O
M
" ^ =2_
S° i? o IR o-o
.a gf g -3
§ -3 ^-5 0- .21
f>J r^H ""*
W"
L3 ^txa
•g f o- | .y J
~S ^ 5 flj *^
*^3T3-S PJ^"O « B
-aii'S'oofflra"!.
c g -3 "..-.„ oo E"
™ 'g •- c U .§ ^ -|
•^4- *? 5 S ?J
U 2 >o a. < --!
cs
I! II
S u S
W ^M'g
I If!
S ^ §
•S o-S
^ E=3
ec S -S
c g,S
'a, « S
O. *w «
nee
iss
cj S S
PS fa fa
"8
IS
1
VI
O
Z
4_l
c
i?
"H-
a.
3
M
§
3
5
§
•a
GJ
^g
£
Q
*
S
2
u
2
CO
M
•a -S
ill
•al
ra ^
§ 8
j£
C
i
£
E
a 0
5 o
8>^
o "o
\o "w
CO C
^ =
1 s
c I -S y
^ C 3 T3
o 8 > i
JS
3
5
>E^ CO C
^ \ [T
ff ^
s Ct ^
as 1 s
I
o
CO
§ 2
306
-------
"o 13
s I
ob „
•g*
Jc s:
S3 J2
8
1
if 1^
; ^ c ra
U-S-«
— u — a .I) 'x
£ . -a u O w »
» £ 60 c .2 "g U 3
^•S^w^^Eo
w 6 bfc rf,
:<_:s
iPijiii.
is5n^i>
g 2 O 8 £ 2
v in > S O 55
...s
O ra — " S "a "
C u __ G bo __.
^ '5 .E c o a CM
« ra ,"! ra '2 L»f ^ -^
S£.E §
01
u
"3
I
§-
S"|
0 S-
-
1
1
o
g-
•3 ra C 5
u g -a w
•a q '0 Q
1 "n Q
«
^
^
T3
C
o
307
-------
o
o.
c
s
u
'. fe S
Rl 51
.« So o
c r E? "
1
o >
CD
2
a .a
3
if
••« •-
a
.5 m
&. T3
*"* "O CO 4J fO
-------
o
I
s
o
CO
1
S "S ^ ? y —
o « 5 S g .g o
*O •" C ^J . •« jo CJ
B a
vO
es
1
§
o
8.1
o c
si
s
S
o
<4_l
I
o
o
•
5 2
•p SJ
= 1 B
vi g -^
•§|s
ra ra wj
o 8 >
I
-S'S
•Sfi
•II
o c
•Z, a
c
o
A
z
K
SS
10
309
-------
Record of Decision Summary Table
I
S
g
£
i 1
c "3
P
2
2
g
1
o
Q-
c
O
Components of
Selected Remedy
| J£Q
^~ *>• 3
2 a s
•S S c
1/3 K gf
CJ
3
1
5
&
g
ti
3
S
CLi
\
*j
£
.0
"w
1
S
&
B
.0
00
y P co o m irt oo
""* "£j QJ ^ ^ O LJ 3
i! J; ifi -^ i "ob Si « .c ~ .y
Excavation and low temperature thermal
treatment of soil followed by backfilling;
capping site with clean top soil; GW pumping
and treatment using air stripping and carbon
adsorption followed by reinjection or other type
of recharge into the aquifer; disposal of soil
and GW treatment residues waste at a RCRA-
approved facility; air and GW monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls
including GW use restrictions
"5,
8s
$•£
0 'S
'S-o %
•S T3 00 M ")
•-- C Ul
5 « £ f~i * •• 00
f 00 ™ u M c
£ 11 =3 8 !
S^s?9
s^sS
^2^ y M w
ra eg ,>• tu c]
a, 0 5 •§ |j
J "§ 2 ^ £
™ a) — O «
o Q. c • nj
t/5 to S in >
Excavation of soil with disposal under cap;
slurry wall installation (completed); SW and
GW treatment with air stripping; and extension
of municipal water supply to affected residents
"§,
o
S
co"
00
w~ :s
fe-S^ =
v* -i* ~ "7^
0 £ oo c
1-Sl s
CO *-> 3 -i-
<8 — C
^r c y «
-1|sw
f i Q •§ 8
c/2 o > oj a,
|
ra K^
£J co
1 2
W tx "
o o 42
M
l/^ C^1
S 3
SI
u
ra
S 2
?
n
VOCs, ini
organics
iff cd
CO .C
*\ ™
CS i
\ „
§ 42
existing water supply system
R
00 /~N
,
1
73
i
"O
^C
u
O
,^N
1 s
213
5 j<
en
TS'C
i §
Hazardous
21 ppm ba
agent with residual discharge to POTW;
additional investigation of the GW to determine
^
0
CO
M
x^
s
"5
if there are no lev
NESHAP
ingestion, :
exceeding
extent of contamination; and limited GW
monitoring, if GW remediation is not required
ft
II
•«• s
c
E
VI
310
-------
.2
£ §'
.2
• e o ea
^ '5 •£ g?
<" i .» o
c X -a «
8 > g o,
I
*>• S
JB S
11
a -c
S-i
«l
I I
S--S
8
"> 2
g
o " a g
llfil
a «
a ^ P
sIII a?
Itilli
I I ff.S 5 I
8 1 i ." 1 =0
3 C 0 vK e
•a .0 -a ., ,„ g
"S
ts
I
&
D !••§ S. 13 8 o
I
o
. -C
.tJ w
u
T3 •«
C C
.5 2
Jli
D.
E
T3
g
•c y ^
.S H O
S bo.S
S-o -
E -S |
CO
^
CO
T
c
E
O
ra
311
-------
Itl
',30
O
ex
3
C
I
QJ
if S
I
o
2 S
c S?
I |
5 I
o
o"
00
•if
85
"w
MH ^ MH
' -S ^ '
% & ^; "
s K n ^
58.3
g
•a
1
c c
O u fli
•g is a
JS b
"8
o
SI g 2
eo S o S
ft SI
co u i—i CQ
ift vii 6% vS
i
I
JJ
5
-
o.
a.
J |
11
2 E
.2 S
I if
I 1
1
I
o
2 "o
c c
8 a
> O
r? S
CK
O
.^
g =
°. o
ill!!'
S ° -n e
™ a c tj 2
S S 'S g "
c .S -
IB "- ,5 C
ill'i
'(3 e 2 S 2 «
E 2 5 8 o. =5
5
"O
B
S
312
-------
.52
§
O
a
u
•8'
a
6S
•*>•
O .
sg
$ g
rH re
PA ,1U,
I
o
fll
'* «f
= ||
IE?
el °
™ S fl
a.§
CO O.
SfS
c
1
a
O 5
of §
1-1 C
*!
I
S *
rs
S -c
nj tj
ll
u 53
B -a 'c1
1 g g
u E f
•S __ -g »
sSS S.S
°£||
c'lli
§ 1 1 I-
w S o, M
1
"8-a
ll
£?
2
(X
g"
g o
8 >
Si 8
o 8 > o
1
o
- _
j- e -3 s
1
s
S c S
y^
Is
313
-------
i «- «- .S B
O O e 'H u_
60 60 S fl O
"'S "! "2 c""a
ft-2 g §5
a to'g s
w •- E
1 Srfll
JI-8
OS 8S T3
i
o
"i -
'
2
fllii
S in
a 00
•-
3 60-*
jp.a
^1
C|
0 g
132
H-s
U'I
S o
P ^
1 -tSg|ll^
slft-sliSl
ililg^l^g
^gE^S^-S - P
•a .S. 8 .s •« -S u 1
<3go;'SsS = S'
^ 5.5 g- B a S S
3 _»j ., «
|lf2"^
QJ rv C -Q £; *
C QJ O flJ QJ "-^
J b S 8 "S- "*
"H, cs -o ex S
g e 3 ex s
.5 a < o o
o o
o" o~
•a
u
.
u P
.
s|
§1
o -a
3
C
cs
a.
cs -
a ~ ^ c
S "9 U 'C
•s S J s
I ™ I 1'
IB CXrs .2
S ^s g,
"n •- C m
•a S e
Hil
IP!
11^
I §11
•s
CO
314
-------
S c o
els
80s
£ u
1
o
0.
n
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
(fl
CO
E
jy
"I
£
CO
Si
.c
E-i
O
1^1
5 cu _
— ^ 3 ^
S n "5
t/5 a;
c
o
'oo
cu
A
08
2 <*
^0)
t-. ^
IN m
^-.f
m t-H
T3 CO
^ I-
(N
|f
& £
Pollution Discharge Elimination
System, Technical Operations
Guidance Series, Ambient Water
RCRA capping; leachate/GW collection and
dewatering of the landfill with onsite treatment
and offsite residual discharge; hydraulic
^
c
CU
g
8 "c
'c ra
00 03
O g-
__
c ^
CO .S J2
c°3 "3 d
ill
00
00
^
CO
o
s
1 o
1^-1
00" vO c
tn co a
& ««
Sediment will be treated to a
100 mg/kg established
background concentration.
Standards for total cadmium
Hydraulic dredging of sediment with chemical
fixation and offsite disposal; dredging, water
treatment, and disposal; marsh restoration; and
site access restrictions
\
CO
00
o
0~
CO
M-o
1118.
w 2 *u "u
• r .s c -^
c P: "" .y
S | j« E
.« c S r^
•a o w c
1 8 E.|
C/3 ^S 5 U
c?
OJ
I
C \D
O CO
•S ^
E ro
IS 1
IN
I 1
is i- 1 i
c ^ 2 s, g.
&& w-5£>
water concentrations include
6.6xlO"4 mg/1 and
2.0xlO'3 mg/1 for water hardness
levels of 50 mg/1 and 200 mg/1,
respectively
•b-J
^3
8
45
I- o
58 o o
0 ° " °
g -a * 2
s- § s 5-
(N c v 2
S vS vb »
o.
3
C
u
o
en
1
1
a.
Decontamination of the inside surfaces and
^
>,
o
0
"O
c
CO
^
O
c
E
•5
S
^
1
^
a
CO
oa
c
o
1
CN
o
o, 2 rv
goals for indicator compounds.
The ACLs are below Federal and
State MCLs, if available, and
include PCE 0 ug/1 and TCE 3
contents of the former battery facility, and
excavation of cadmium-contaminated soil and
the dredge spoils vault, followed by onsite
fixation of the excavated soil, dust and vault
*TJ "§
C
/_^ o .5
I 11
•o 2?
a •— "a
C ^ CO 00
1 g w- !
S — ' p 3
C r^ "u
^ X "O .E
M > g J£
*c ^- "^5
£ -S w jr"
u -5 y a
•a s ts E
^
;—
t— , "0
S 05
" _
c -J2
CO C
OH «
E3
•a
(S 1
I
— ' — ^
s_ , » — ,
2
1
1°
u "
3 W
sediment with offsite disposal, and backfilling
excavated areas; excavating the VOC-
(A
2,
-a
B
cs
o1
CO
IN
' — '
E
0
CN
"3
1
institutional controls; and evaluation and
performance of repairs, if needed, to the
inoperable sprinkler and heating systems inside
the former battery facility
315
-------
^
£ -o a
oca
£ «3
sis
8 S-8
a,
w
1
o
a,
1
>%
mponents of
ected Remed
33
cu
E
3
P
>
S
-2
^
1
15
1
^
gj
£
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
o
'5o
u
ai
$48,499,500
Acceptable sediment
ited sedimeni
CO
um-contamin
•|
*o
CO
60
C
'&
H
Q
^
g
O
i/T
IT)
1
__
2
y
C
e
J
Ss
S c
£1
0 >>
a*
concentration of cadmium is
mg/kg. Expectations are tha
S-a
|g
OK/\
OO
•§•!
18 U
1*
*ZJ (—
gf
,2 >
la. >
ite chemical
nt sampling
W 0)
0 E
=3
>, 5
J3 %
"S -a"
C1J CO
> w
O gi,
li
C
.a U
,« o.
O w
•g a
co ra
>
•o
3
M
t technology
e
n of treatme]
.0
CO
3
C
•a
c
g
•o
c
CO
Former Radium
Processing or
Utilization Area
8 s
I
I
i
•s
> PJ
l!
II
o >
tu _-
e .&
O JS
316
-------
o
a.
3
i
u
a
s
s
li
"8
is
1
o
§.s
II
8 «
o >
I
o
S J3 S
•Sf g
I*?
*r.lh
~ c X
Q O P
(X u >
S <"
£ S
CO
CO
I 1 I «
Z >3 O -H
O O
o o
O O w
§S|:
881
'
'•§
"e -0 "
JO N .£ §
OJ -C _C OJ
13 = O OJ -C
lal**:!
"till
»«= B •-1
ffSI
1
I
o
1
i|, i
222 2
g S
317
-------
K
1
ex
•*
QJ* U
EP-
tr
ro rp
.— ra
" K
TJ a
C <"
CO °
S g
'S. 08
30
W5
§
O
o.
3
C
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
3
1
0)
VI
&
S
Threat/Problem
^ c
2 o
S'§
Signature
Remedial /
e
o
'5b
OJ
rt
o
o
o
in" £
s 1
CO- §
s£
OJ
ex
o
si
1 n
« M
S 2
£ o
— W5
"Si
_ . -Q
S c
l!
1 s
H to
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
and, if necessary, carbon filtration with
"8
e
1
V5
4—1
O
2
J3
1 £
GW contaminated
benzene, and tolue
>•
z
oT
CXI
S.
_c
1
T3
O
(N
S
c
i
m E
H/i -J
OO ,-r
1 1
la*
111
•B 53
U O M
§ e g
fa S «>
s-,—
C CO
0 JJ 3
:s b 3
3 E -S
C T3
8 S S
J3
be
discharge into an upgradient injection well
system; hydraulic control of the plume throu
installation of GW recovery wells; GW
^
'5
M .„
e -M
and metals includil
chromium and lea<
contaminated with
\
S.E
'0 -a
S §.
65-Acre Mi
Industrial 1
W — ;
"§tl .^
0.025 mg/1
, benzene r
toluene 50
•s^-«
1^ S
— - ^ nT
^bx -°
E a1 2
in E Si
9 9 S
o m -o
oo3
monitoring; completion of the landfill cappin
(29 acres previously capped); continuation ai
expansion, or enhancement, of the leachate
•a
c
nJ
•f:
IX
%
1
(U
03/17/88
1st - Final
a . S"p
IliSH
III^I*
a u% §9«0
•H, •
z,
o
00
c
1-1 C
S«S
01
RCRA capping with slurry wall containment
system and site grading; and GW and leachal
recovery and treatment
to
CB
1
06/06/84
1st - Final
S
K~ ^
CN"M o g
II II
•a
ta
I
o
T3
J3 C
Removal and offsite disposal of drums and la
packs; and excavation and offsite disposal of
visibly contaminated soil with GW pumping a
removal
-a
S
I
o
(/r &
.a ~s
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, PCBs, organ
pesticides, and met
•-a
Z
1 •* ~%
CO CO C
fe ^ s
J< m
•2. > "
•' § s
(N
318
-------
lulitl!
"•s 3 8
o
iL
81 8"!
r-i D- i-l C
. w . c
CN u rH nl
-
o
U >
lilt
S « qj w
qj X3 4-j
w< 2 G
b V
nj Ul
22 so
C3 ej
•a
.E i I
SL3.N ft
bo S? ^ CS L-
e .S fe M S
•a = S SP-c
2 2
S § T, a g 60
^ •- c 'C to 'S
s -a P S s 2
•S C > . -l *s
o
1 1!
11 -s'
o o u -s a
o > H O E
(^
oo
Sj
^
o
.E >• ™
•S* £
lia" Ki
S
^
CO
§tA
I-H
319
-------
**-t
II
&
a
I
.2 o
<0
3
1
J
1
i
o
2
>s
5 -g
e **
§ .S
2
•g «
TO O
O =3
.1
o
o
o
es"
QJ
3
S
o.
^
O > § .S B
•5 8
''
•
c g w
™ 2 3
a 8 >
w"
toll^S
11-5 a-tf
a
> *j ^-<
OS^
g PK,
nil
O
b
! ! ?!
£Z 5 I
> w
1
.
ex
(S
T3
C
01
o:
320
-------
u
ol
2 •
•*
SI S ?
o 0 S3 C
o 2
if
o
Jg J,
"i.
in"
00
1
o
1
o
2
'§•
S
-
g «
I
I
I
r*
f^NI
E
I
!• ! .1
0 ^ fc
II § «
S tL, O i—I
321
-------
u
a
3
B
U
,
'S'S
U
—
tx 3
'
25 o
o S oC"« o
§1 Sf I
1
o,
3
Q.
U
T3
B
to
bo
B
'S.
d,
3
1
o
Illl
; g|
u 8 ? .s
I
il Sfl^l'l
*ll^!^E
o s^^-ss
U2 C8 =3
o
-C
'5
§1
§."
E 00 .S-
™.S £ fi
III
,«'§ 8
.§ 8^
tf TD C O< — J5
S S 'fi .1 '§ -8
" S
S 8
_
C >H
u5 Z
CK
O
§ ^2
^S
^
S s
S E
« a
611
$*
I
II
.s 'a i
-a ]£ bo
B =3 E
*3 O -r1
nog
.2 E w
•p w =5
1=3-1
•g
ta
8 >
!
15
o
CO
1
o
H
322
-------
X
fc
t- T3 £9
o c «
S §5
|ll
«s " °
IA
1
O
a.
3
r"
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
a;
3
£
cu
wi
n
&
Threat/Problem
> c
. S g
gfcS'J
« 5?
2 o ?
t |Ss
o co o. 2?
(A «* ^? O
^
"5,<*
E °
8CJ
c
g!
!• a
r^U
_r w
o
s|
* c
c/1 ^-«
TJ Hi "x
Z-S2
S-s q
> -r- O
O ? K
No further action with GW monitoring
- & « a
w>S SS
gr^
t°A
s s-iS
2 u
U3 -g 0.
jc « e
III
* u C
(U X O
0 OJ U
!-£:§
N1^
nj _ <_r x
•SlJlt
wa r5 ..
Capping; removal of tanks and building debri
with offsite incineration; treatment or disposj
of tank contents with offsite disposal of tank;
and building debris; excavation and offsite
disposal of buried sludge waste area; and
excavation and offsite disposal of PCB
contaminated soil
1
1
CA
4_>
0
2
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
3
S 8
1 1 -
1 § ,2
(N
o
o
°, ~
if
in" S
«« -r.
00
""l^
M ob 3
g E s
• M
JJ M C
j= To 3
U i-i C
co g co
0 JJ gl
" "r^1
lit
-IS
•its
Excavation of lagoon sediment and highly
contaminated subsurface soil with offsite
disposal.
*•)
\ *
>• o
8 8
tx O)
e
GW, soil, and sedimei
contaminated with
VOCs, PCBs, organics
2
t/r
c
'8
at •*>
00
c \
O Os
U IN
R fc
in o
CN
^.^
s
„
o —
S-S
S i
al
•P s
standat
' treatm
° ?
X 0
Ul
M ,2
•a "-
S *j
flj n
g SB,^
— • w *-*
11 li
«l^§
tS.S-s'1
p p a .&
S *-s
^TxT >- C
^ efc-a co
|N 1 »
5 W — "ai
u U ~ >
.E S S ^
E
1
i
s
2
t/3
U
1
Installation of GW monitoring wells with
implementation of a monitoring program to
delineate extent of plume; GW treatment usir
air stripping followed by reinjection; exhaust
gas analysis; and soil sampling of former drui
dumping and storage area
•g
IS
1
v:
O
•z.
.c
GW contaminated wil
VOCs including 1,1,1-
TCA and DCE
§ 1
oT d<
- .2
rO Q
II
(N
c»
00
^
nj m
$ t
"3
C
K
CA
(
o o _
o o o
°- °. — 0
O O CO
o o .t; <-r
ro
"i ^
CU g
•a^
CX **
3 CO
CD o
iil
u
O
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
with discharge to either a GW recharge area
a public water supply system; installation of
chloride monitoring wells near the coastline;
and GW monitoring
"8
c
1
(/5
O
2
_e
GW contaminated wil
carbon tetrachloride
£>
I* 1
y £ !jS
!•§! i
fil i
(N
/- N
s
_S(
a
8?
»- S
8 g
fel
CO
oo
^
CO
5?
o
1
b
a
T— 1
323
-------
n ~a
f S
el
CJ rs.
1(3
OH
iponents of
B
u
£
l|<3
*fl
•Sag
1/3 Si
on
a
3
s
g
M
a,
3
i
u
>,
•8
i
1
JB
A
aj
E
_3
O
>
V
v
1
1
2
E
CL,
\
1
C
C.
<
*c
1
!
pi
c:
c
'5
a
OH
|
1
3f
1
C
,
JS
•n
8
3
1
S
S
"O
•i
i
j=
1
%
o
IS
£
u
o
CJ
g
o.
00
in
«}
^
i— i
T— *
1
f-
d
ta
%
£
60
C
'E
3
43
(fl
1
stripping, am
with discharj
i system; and
.fa
n
w~
i
a
D.
^
"S*
Cu
3
v5
"E.
60
w
^
bo
C
"3
g
1
8
>
c
_g
•e
5
"S
!
u
K
•a
c
ra
tx
co
^
1
O
•3
3
.Q
1
•a
U
|
a,
S
3
1
c
c
CO
OJ
C
O
N
1
^
3
CO
0^
o
OJ
1
_o
X
u
^
JJ
•5
3
1
y
i
8
5
M
•s
?
o
I
0
1
tS
T— 1
00
cs
tu
c
(U
J=
^J
_o
r-j
^y
*c
T3
C
M
1
tv
d
S
1
g
O
•a
3
£*
•fi
M
'•3
u
1
Q.
'o
nment
2
n
a
ra
2
3
1
i
o
•a
S
(a
•a
g
3
'w?
I
£ §
15
IB
1
•§
a
. _ o ^
• O in -—
IU S,
W-r
I
eo
C
O >
o,
3
If §
> ? o
.1 "i
^.a-SPlr
i~ stilvsl'
t/5 60 r-1 S E BO.
O
8
o
11
H1
a g j«
_-| 2
JS
OJ
IS
OS
M
I «
324
-------
V
3
ord of Decision Summary T
<2
1
s
rsl
gj
§2
fT
&t
c-a S3
£83
S-ls
83*8
(X °
V.
1
O
c
C
S
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
u
3
•X
5
^
£!
W5
03
E
CJ
3
\
4->
£
^^§
E!°I
co C^ 1)
2 > 3^2
all's
w S ||
KS
c
•a
CJ
rt
"8
ia
(A
S
z
V
3
.1
"5.
ex
CO
S
z
(4-1
O
J2 v
B-S
^ c
> 'S
:stigation results indicated very lov
tamination. Because risks fall witl
> S
S 8
jy
2
CO
.0
*-l ".
5 ex
2; co
S
o
Z
41
2
W3 3
T3 2
(0 "o
ll
5«
tN
a
s
c/3
OJ
:ptable range, as determined by th
y
EPA, no further remedial action i;
•o
c
CO
8
sidered necessary
8
&
'G
_£
CO ^
Resident!,
Treatmen
S s -o =• _ _ „
e|SSr--?H-s
EX'S
325
-------
1 Record of Decision Summary Table
M
S
£
*.
m
fe
e -a a
o c g
ill
£3°
Cleanup Goals
Components of
Selected Remedy
u
E
_3
P
^*
3 .2
a
tj
to
a,
2
*^ t~v
^ CO
u ^
•o fNi
*w *^ w
& 2 o rt
oq
0 ^
& 'S,
w ^i
.
||
IN
S
S
S
O 3
t^ ,
vO ^
.t! "O
residuals; offsite disposal of contaminated
asphaltic material, and repavement of roadways
and driveways; perched water treatment in
sewer trench; construction of hydraulic barrier
at end of sewer trench; conduction of
in
§
LO 10
CO .C
"\ ^
Os t/5
O rH
treatability study to determine effective PCB
and soil treatment; and sewage and sediment
sampling
s
°8
=>-, °
LO — " O *"3
t^ ra o ™
SS IS
:>
Soil will be excavated to the Nev
Jersey Environmental Cleanup
Responsibility Act (ECRA) target
level of 1.0 mg/kg total VOCs.
GW will be treated to MCls
which include TCE 5.0 ug/1,
chloroform 100.0 ug/1, barium
1,000.0 ug/1, arsenic 50.0 ug/1,
cadmium 10.0 ug/1, chromium
50.0 ug/1, and lead 50.0 ug/1
Excavation of soil with removal to an offsite
disposal facility for incineration; regrading,
revegetation, and site restoration; GW pump
and treatment using air stripping and carbon
adsorption with reinjection; and provision of an
alternate water supply to affected residences
•a
>,
o
o
w" •"
«Sl
S bo E
^. -a -S -a
" 1 1 J
n ra '« 'S
"s § o &
C/l U > 0
«
P*
1
t^ ^
« CO C
E \ [T
10 ON
•> H2 ON trt
> 2 O r-l
CS
O
|
g
a
OJ
•s
c
1
10
c
_
"u
O
Excavation and onsite solidification of soil and
T3
X
Q
§-
CO
•a
c
to
5
Lr
c
1
"
1
><
IT3
O
Q
>"
CN
^^
I
NS
.u
"o
0
bO
_C
^
I
3 co
&4 O
offsite thermal treatment of tank oils in
addition to other soil collected at the site;
cleaning and demolition of empty storage tanks;
and surface grading
10
bo 'g'
o c
o ^
-------
E-O a
5 c S
> a 8
e 3 s
I'fg
Jtf
c
1
01
••M
X
£
? Record of Decision Summarv
S
00
fe
Components of
Selected Remedy
.3
*o
>
M
S
OH
I
J=
w -a
6 ^ ^
fl n Si —
Sill
1/3 s.&g
c
o
'5b
S
4_J
"* c
*-* o3 o
Hi
*4M
O
to
_e
1 ^
fs
' o
IE
•3 'E
a S
a -e
T3
•« s
2 S
.a S
T3 X
^ffl "
Excavation and offsite stabilization
contaminated soil, followed by offsi
in a landfill; and replacement of thi
soil with clean fill
„
0
1
€
1 S?
.S =6
E 3.
e-S 1
— 3 p
SI-S
04 f*>
.5 '"5
JO tt,
04 "co
« 'S
T3 3
J "S
CO
.
10
«/> >
E
CO
, £
o o
o o
o o
\o~co~;
TJ* \o
-
CO" S
8 S
o g
5"g'
tv CL
I
C
v w".i2
t
lill
a geotex
of waste
on
ar
IK!,
Mill
lip
ro 5 "5
C Qj" o
f'PJN
'P =3 C CJ ..
CO O Q .S3 S
a " a, -a -53
fs *.s §
t?.in
ft?f{
u a. ? ^
- 1 E - -a
8 i tiS g
ii
o ^
O yj
o -s
iment and
slope stabilit
after testing;
and a
sed
§
cu
fis
e 8 a
7 fe
X § to
t/5 co S
•§
m s S
327
-------
U
<^H -H
O S
a |
g Si
P
as
O O ,_!
o o e
o o 3
o" o" K3 U ^
8 S B, g .|
88T3-S
*o~ oo~ •
O 00
CO CO
ted
be
I
S J£
g.S
e I
S u
5 v
£>
to
CLs
ilabl
incl
goals
(MCL
1
.
11
c c
S <
to —
5 J. =
-a §
B 'B
- 1
"1
>N *?
5 "8 =a
Sii
™ a
5>
I
to
1 I S
328
-------
13
1
§ «i
H* £ •
" ? :
1! § o "
«5 8 > ~"
o
.2 eo 13
Q « .5 -5
a ^ fa F
ft s N i i
o? ft -S < <^ «
5 ;S oa B< o ••*
| ^ tt
n o ,-H
.
«5 I
329
-------
£
O "§ M
^ - o
c 2 g
S '5.3
£ 5 o
0.
3
C
U
*
X
•8-8
si
« «
1*8
IB
33
i
1
^
c
c
!
< S
TO
E
CU
.0
%
s
£
^c
oT i? g 'g
•-a 1^
Maw|
c
o
'ob
TO !x
e
si
1 1
CJ CU
'C ^
s M —
13
TO
1
:>
T3
C
(9
yf
C
U
1
"S ^
4J ra
« "Jfl
S
S 0
•S ™
•g £?
^^
S^
'i ™
I 1
§
ON wi
O M
2^
ejfcj o
||e °-
3 § ^ 1-1
1
a
3
i
.52
2
cu
<
<,
£
'o
c
2
s
£
3
^-
O
c
_o
1
s
_
S
V)
O
z
.g
?
CO
c
'§
ra
c
i
5
^
i
%
CO
4-^
If
o, S
for vanadium; however, an
unpublished Estimated Advisory
Concentration for vanadium of
J_
s
•a
c
<
c
Q
tc
TR "o
S..S
TO^S
^ *?
>> §
1 E
•!£
^"5
ag.
13
_u
"S
00
ll
"^ "re
'w §
aj "2
C CO
i
_«
OJ
CO £
U_i
tc
1
i
'I
1
tv
tx
water systems. Remediation wi
attain the Clean Water Act leve
CO
CO
X
o
E
Tj-
CO
1
U
'5
£
1
E
•a
c
f^
i- §°f
§ 1 1 1 1 %
<£ 5^ 1 " TO S^
* R
Soil will be excavated until
organics are undetectable (<50
mg/kg). GW performance level
include benzene 0.005 mg/1
(MCL), phenols 3.5 mg/1
(AWQC), chromium 0.05 mg/1
(MCL), and lead 0.05 mg/1 (MC
0 2
di QJ
ifiu
i|rg.||
111 «f .s
s ^ a | 'B 1
O n ^ '" "O
^3 ^ « p cu 3 ej
S c = = " S |
t».2 ^ 8 a § §
g (a | efts S S
If a ill I
w a u u ? > o.
\
8^
O ™
CN g
ro
'S u,
TO -rT CJ
^ u? y TO 'S
'? oo ° °° c1^ §>
"llfllll
1 '§ '- g ^ ^ -| g
iliiiiii
5 E
u ~o
Q c
1 1 | I
Ss i i s
CO
8 s
°- 1 '•s
S >3 i
Remedy prevents exposure to
concentrations of TCE in excess
of Federal, State, and local
health-based ARARs
CO
g
X
"H.
Q.
3
VI
S =
co 'C
*.i
£ ^
i ^
^5
13 O
C "O
TO C
«- «
O ".
!i S
1!
-a
CU
S
(A
O
z
.£
^E^
cu ^
S C
c .5
I"3
S "w w
C .S M
5 § c
U > TO
&i
ta S
1 1
U f-
co
s^
?f
i i l
8 la
§
^
(N to
330
-------
^
c TJ a
^ ra o
111
a,3o
Q,
3
C
U
J
Components of
Selected Remedy
g
i
!
5
6
QJ
3
2
OH
CO
£i
£
.xSJ
^ X f*^ U
E 5; <
•i s il
V3 p;
c
.0
£?
rt
o
o~
•*£>
CN_
5
C
'1
g
Installation of dual-activated carbon adsorptior
o
z
.g
1
T3
ra
_c
re
c
o
"
o
<
&H
e"
CJ
"g
U
CO
1
•£>
C
CO
CJ
I
^
C
ro
^
CO
c
3
S3
1
TS
1
CO
CO
a
'E
3
1
S
w
u
^
ro
&
'u
tt,
bO
1
1
0
^
o
81
o- 1
§s
W QJ
1 1
J _ £,
JS §" 3 "So
§
permanent clean water supply is developed;
implementation of periodic sampling at
potentially affected homes; construction of a
new uncontaminated water supply to serve
affected and potentially affected homes and
businesses; and periodic sampling of residence;
outside the affected area
c^
cl 1
Q
^
o S
o O
ll tl
sS Ss
Recovery wells will operate until
concentrations of VCM, EDC, and
TCE reach 1 ug/1, 0.94 ug/1, and
2.7 ug/1, respectively, for two
consecutive sample analyses
Excavation and removal of contaminated soil
and sludges with offsite disposal; capping; GW
pumping and treatment; and alternate water
supply
•a
o
8
in
CN
w
•Z3 "S UH
° '>
f > 00
•a -a .S
C OJ T3
re —
^T C v
t/3 6 '
- 1 u
o 8 >
u
£j"
u
co rp
3s o? s
Q Q 0 r3
CO
o
o
||
s£
.si
2 ^
a a
ll
^ o
« J£
3 4J
C ~
CS JX
V in
~3 'C
$1
rr3
|
^
site boundary, and meet NPDES
requirements for SW discharge.
Individual GW cleanup levels
were not specified. Soil cleanup
Excavation and onsite incineration of
approximately 36,000 tons of contaminated so:
and waste from the Drum Disposal and Ridge
areas, followed by residual ash disposal offsite
grading, and revegetation of excavated areas;
removal and offsite disposal of surface debris
^
tf
l/> >^-/
J2
5I
O re
"^ •—
c E
!3 C
« 8
G
re
re
c/3 w
||
U CJ
CO
T3 of
c -5
£
fjlg
T3 ""I ° oo
C 1J~ ^ c
*"* C ffi •-•
t3 g S 3
>£"&._=
1
3
T3
c
•^ "O
(N 3
levels were based on acceptable
drinking water exposure levels
and include toluene 6,000 mg/kg,
c
from the Inert area, followed by capping;
construction of a RCRA cap over the Granthar
South area; GW pump and treatment with
T3
."fja co
C c C
•^ vi '£
•£"5 |
g 1-s
CO *CO
00 .C
cl 2
W
"o
1
ex
•a
c
CO
00
^
"So
"^
|e
^i tx
^ 0\
x -3-
offsite discharge; and GW monitoring
•g
0 ^
o a
o O
lit 11
«a > 3
-------
Record of Decision Summary Table
g
fe
S
S
E
>
u "n
p c
£ *
c S
« 'S,
Is3
Components of
^^
el°
5 K Si
2 S 3
.ssl
5/1 #.!>
t^
s
s
0
s
u
o,
3
B
RJ
a
Selected Remedy
OJ
£
_3
"o
S
W
1
E
JU
3
1
>
1
c
_g
|
13
H
1
e
o
'&
ctf
8
in ^
s"l
in d.
in S
w -ii
"8
QJ
IG
1
M
I
Removal and consolidation of contaminated
sediment from the drainage ditch, drainage
•Q
B
ta
1
i/i
GO
fc
01
1
S3
oO
8.1
S e
ON e
S«a
s e
1 « 8
1 a^,
W CJ
bQ „ 0)
11 2
0. Q, D.
8=3 S
Itl
u 3 -0
•§ "-2
sl-
ip
" bo c
'| JH -a
§ ^1
•*- *o ™
? "w .5
s
•5 J£
O, a
s* w
.S E
12 T5
5 c
O CO
c .
— M
W3 CO
•IH
S-O
C C
O ro
W5
100-year flooding event; and soil predesign
study to determine extent of excavation and
capping
§ «
0 |
8 8
3f&
M
«
-E |
8|
§5
^"S
bo S
» (0
'S- ^
•l|
cyT C
.3 Q,
1 P-
H «J
Removal, transportation, and offsite incineration
of liquid and sludge tank waste;
f
o
o
0 ^£
o" 5
8-S
bo *-j
C C
11
0. o.
S2"'5
•2 ST
C CJ
2 i
cn1 ej
bo 5
1 s.
~ T3
s §
^<
•5 ^
« -a"
_ra g
00 O
p .S2
Q Q
CO
^^
•g
1
"o3
x^t a"
3 E V
(U 03 O Q
sit5
Sf (0 3 0)
g g 0
A -S o j«
15 E o "t
1/1 a i-i 3
fe c -P §
£ § p u
TJ § 8 -S
a-S £ e
S X o °
.§3^ 2 g
ffi ~ o u
•a S c a
decontamination of tanks, piping, processing
equipment, and building materials; offsite
disposal of building rubble; selling of tanks and
other metal materials as scrap; offsite disposal
a1
a
S
- "p
•5 cw
•ti ca —
> (X)
S cS aj
-1-1 •-- W n
1 g^ E
§ &t"S
•g ° .s ™
S 3! .a"
e X TI ~a
8i.s£
bo
C bo
« c
>,•§
a 1
OH O
oj jx &
!•§!
5 S (2
o c $ •
c w o i
J2" S -S S- :
Illli
1 « gf 1
08 •« 'B '
sgi 5^
•S fc « wf
0 .s -S n .-
-a eg P V ,
» 4.3 M •*• t
C r- C5
:-si^
~ » P bb <
_s -g j g 4.
a 'J '
M -S 1) O V»
a f £ in f
of concrete, asphalt, and other materials; and
treatment of generated decontamination fluids,
as appropriate
"a
_
bo
B
^
_3
3
CO
00
*
^ T=
vd C
o cs
u W % S" JS 0
J * C '« .S "-
&!fi!S*
?!isii
3 — m ^ z v
s ^ E -5 g Si
•> !2 3 u 8 's
2 Jj 6 £ E Ei
« Q. ^ v** ..— (U
S* 4J S
S ° 2|^"5
2 S 4- S ^ &
s p 0.5 o E
3 ^ g < B S
id g = s " a
- «
-------
—» c t! 'w 'g g o
5 b s oj '3 2 S co-
to i-i H .2 u e .S N
•5 ..
1^ ^|
w" 'S J § 1
•* >2. •« vo -5.
O
CO CJ
y"o.s-s
I-
c rt .
i | .c g" S J £ j»- .§•
|S'3'o^"S.gc
is^rr5-g-«
I
13
1
t/5
S
6 s
dj O
^ CO
•C «
-0 •£ £?
?!li
ill!
sill
°. _- s
™s efu
>- s P -y •§ ^
0-3 a" ara s
s I a11fe 3 E
Ililtfh
•o
u- S
g^
« e
£ w
lllll
•o
c
(N
E
..
QJ
2 -s
o S
£
•s
333
-------
•8
g'S.a-g'sBwS:5
i a "3 & a s 13 'e S
lilliilll
W
•o
0^-5? 8
111 S.
--
t/5
o p"i i i•§"§
o > .S E .S co co
1 £
U
3
•g
TB
tc
o
c to co a" 2
§!£§§
l-^llo
c a a g y
g -p g •= S
fc C v ua a
J2
i
u >
1
I
#§
X ™.
J5
I
1
=«
u
CLJ
Is:
=
N
§1 £{j! §
§ i 3 s 2"°
•g «
^^S-5|I
o
c -a
8 5
-I,
g§
UJ
Q
a
o
§ 2
334
-------
£2
1
£-
•B^l
| £«
$$£
S-o jo
_ c g
C co O
o ~'5
•3TB J9
o o
STB
m y
S £ S £ 8
8
So w <5 to
al a-51-2
|'S^Ig?
i'feillSl
s'5
I"S«
^ TO ^
i'1-8
(N -2--0
TO
00
o g
§J
vO O
5 "^ c
'5 TO £ ^ jg
"S <" 'S •§" ? "" '5
Sg>g&iS.s^
I I I o^a:-i S
EaS^ Q.u2..
Od^el
8 - | °=5| »!
« I
o
tt
S!
re
1
Ov
§
I
"So
0*6
, .- U5
Is
01 E Ti
'c 3 .S
•o ^-v 11
111
ja
cu
- "o
83
V jj
o
o
O ^-N
of!
to
3
C
-5 B S
o
JJ
'I
> C X T3
5 8i S
c
•a
c
^3
S
S
'£
52 w
o »-<
335
-------
-S3
1
o
sl-a
•a E
8s
tv O
of£
R.I
l/) O
8
a
a
•s
!
•HI SI
u S
|S g-
rs co
0 \ w
w ro «
fc, O 1-1
Si < S o? c
K tf So cs
I I s
336
-------
o
o.
3
e
8
u
05
'2
'5.
o -s
s 1
8
•a
e
ra
c S
Jl
•S <-"
^ CO
O bO*ra
c c 5
a '§ «
u " E
Ji S E
HI ^ ^
•s
-
a O « 8
a -8 I e |
8.
o
.
I?
S T3
C K
O —
2
2
2
•p.S
53 TJ
s 3
§il
I i
s § §
w -a o
1
1
(A
1
•a
•S S
'* tf
-
IP
S!
1
a"
337
-------
jjj
•rt
1 Record of Decision Summary 1
M
1
E
*? — - 03
& "O i2
:> G S
IIs
&
3
D.
3
I
a
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
E
3
1
&
CO
Threat/Problerr
||
ill!
•* a
c
_o
fp
a.
-
o *
282 s 5 ^
T. fl P °* y> S
m i2 § «•> K 3
w^S w£3
" §i 60
2 ^A "
illif
1 1 .s | S
Ji'b •« S &
a-"1 Si .a a
3 U _ c §
i -a § & g
•3 -2 ;o g J
iiili
60
If -L ll^l
^^il 111 a 1 !•§
SlfilUliila'
•s 1 1 ° § i 1 11 « ^ 'g
i§j°5§i|||°|
SSf^ll^Sl^li
^!illH?il-
lllll^Iilll^
S-gSsgjig^fc^"™
C .2 -a 5 u TJ o _- .."g 5 ;.-
igtl8Sl!»l3ffa-a
S •? s -S i 'S s 1 K l f §
.§e><3£lSwraS"6o
•if--ujSugeig'Si5-2§J
S^^SS'SgilS^gS
w
o
8
CO"
1—1
QJ
S
o ^
a • c* u ^
CU £ /~ (.
"S a a §
lilfg
w 2 H S
~ c c T; c
$ 8 8 .s X
T3 a
C 'M
ro n)
1 < 1 S
U > tS "
< = •§ " -
53 1 S 42
m
S
(O<
l« ^
ll 11
« S 2" |
W ^ V>^s
•g
If1
|as
•"* CN *o
u •-< e
>2 ° "
BN
ll|f
a u ° y
Bo-S c »
illS
Permanent relocation of residents
1
U
O
1
(S
c
.5 60
Dwellings contam
with radioactive
materials includin
radium
g
£ c in
So eo
o 'a S
T3 ra g
11 1 S
fO
i 1 ^
HI If
" ^
•5
§S'§
"^ B — •
I^J
i- -• e
v2 0 «
S|£
H§§
5o-S e "•
Ills
8
o
J
Demolition and offsite disposal of tw
and excavation and offsite disposal o
contaminated soil
1
1
o
Z
— j" ™
Dwellings and soi
contaminated witl
radioactive materi
including radium
£
ii I
il 1 ,
rd ^5 O^ C
J CC o es
CO
2
8 ^ O
It |i
r/K ^^ f» ^^
•S*
T3.a
si
^ g -S -
"7u co o w
I-S3 g g
!3 j§ J'|
f "i -1 §P
u j5 3 c
»g8-P
s2 E .sa S
1
1 S'l
Excavation, consolidation, and anaen
biodegradation of contaminated soil;
removal and offsite disposal of conta
debris
f
s
co"
_e
Soil and debris
contaminated wit]
pesticides
oT
-a
'u
•a
sc
c §
1 £
I) > \
3% 8
CO
r- 1
U
1
to
-------
Ijl
|.f S
1
o
Q.
3
E
U
•»
Components of
Selected Remedy
1
3
1
V
tn
ro
Threat/Problem
s?§
C p, Q Jj
K 5S .1 §
V3 ^
E
O
'So
50 mg/k
0
^ "re O
« o tu
*^3 &1 *"•
ra^l^
G [« t>o .0 §
*^ *o .S S ?
Excavation and removal of cor
transformers, and debris with <
soil; demolition of onsite build
backfilling, grading, and vegeti
minimize erosion and control i
1
I
o
Z
.c
'S
Soil contaminated
VOCs and PCBs
o"
•g
S S3 1
-E if E
_60 J^ ,
QJ CN to
»-J O T— '
CO
o JSS
00 *)
it Si
Not specified
.1°
1
•a
c
1
•a
2
bo
.E
1
E
'S.
O.
"8
S
'§.
CA
O
Z
•8
*-< fto
CO e
•o E .E -a
E •= -a E
Q B 3 a
£- 1 ! Pj
5~ c O "S
0 i > *-i
1 !
CU 00
li i s
CO
8 1
<==• E
r-T M C _
VO .tj M Q
O D. ^ <
S -§• § O
E V -S
•S a !„
Q — & 60
1 U S s
Soil excavation will be b
visible contamination.
Carcinogens will be treal
ug/kg for individual
contaminants, which cor
to the 10"4 to 10"* risk n
60
C
'£>
•n a
•S .E
3 "M
E .S *t!
W!a °
" o ^3
Excavation of carbon waste pil
soil with transportation to an <
incineration facility and dispos
RCRA landfill
JU
'rs'ui'
K i 1
oo £> a
£
I PL]
Soil contaminated
VOCs including PC
and TCE; other
organics including
PCBs; and metals
including lead
6 S
""D tS
E <£ _
-1 ! !
> C 3 CO
••*• C x) ^
S 3 £ o
CO
^^
80 i°
1! 11
"8
•»
t-i
1
Extension of existing municipa
affected residents
"8
>a
I
(A
O
Z
•S
a'S'l
Illi
jg C M *g
lill
2
_E
J2 ft co "c3
* "3. °° .E
CO
Q S
1/^2 28
If S
1
1
0
oj "«
CO Jv
"e u '§
3 .a .g
L? O 5 W
Cleaning and removal of unde:
storage tanks; excavation and
visibly contaminated soil; and
analytical results of soil analys
1
1
M
0
z
.§
«
GW and soil
contaminated with
organics and inorg
<
p-
5 cS
1 1
1 i
CO
339
-------
|
o
5
c
CJ
£
flj (L?
E g;
sf
TJ
E
ra
3
0.
(3
a
u
S
°
w
g
o
ex
i
u
*^_
Components of
Selected Remed]
^
1
Signature
OJ
S
3
1
£j
«
Threat/Problem
E
1
Remedial
E
'BO
&
§
o~
co_
*a
8.
„
o
*
1
i
•a
1
3
a
c
o
V
•S
,
o
• £3
•5
S
1
•a
E
ra
1
I
"S
c
1
t/s
o
1
•a
c
ra
1"
o
ra
1
McAdoo A
CO
/-^v
3
'B,
o
E
3
1
•a
8
1
U
1
"S
J-J
'e
•"^
> n
contaminated soil
-a
B
ra
wT
J3
V
•a
contaminated with
g
•a
ra
BO
"Sb
3
|
|
u
BO
^
^
C/J
BO
B
'B.
ex
S
I
**•
Q
B
O
•a
ra
S
X
QJ
1
«r
BO
E
a
o
**- •*
J>
g
^
CO
CO
V
^
1
BO
I
•a
B
a
1
1
solvents, metallic
06/28/85
=•
^
5
S
ex
E
ra
s
ra
•o
E
m
T3
_3
"w
caustic liquids, toluene,
waste oil/water, and
•g
CN
S
1
•a
1
8§i
. s
1
I
o
I
k4
.£
I
•O
3 Q
S S
3
JS 'C
a
|11
III
JD § S
O « H
III
•s
> UJ
It
11.
> ra
-o
BO 3 B
-^ a
•3
'S
t/5
_
BO
3
•a
B
O «.S c?
§.slS
•g-SB
S
b j= .S a
jj .a ex > g
° S = g «
1 ^ S- i §
™ g E S -a
g e -s 11
•a ra 3 g g
ra « ^ E"5
S "a U > o
x c ? > o
W 3 C UJ CB
ex
g
Q
Ql 00
C \
L-I r^*
o o
O
"8
ia
1
(S
T3
I I
lls
340
-------
Components of
Selected Remedy
.
o
OJ
I
H —
foi
e,
u
J4
•a I
•S *
s
te
criterion of 4.4 mg/1 whi
based on an average dail
of 0.125 mg/kg/day of tri
(2-chloropropyl) -phosphat
•
IBS S
Natural attenuation; GW, SW, and sedimen
monitoring; and implementation of institutil
controls restricting further well installation
the shallow aquifer
1
Consolida
applicatio
excavatio
area and
sediment
ding and getation
surface manament tec
and sediment ontrol in
ambient air and post-tre
gra
1
I
.* 1?
- s fl
S § 1 S 1 g
_ "
S 1
a i1 ~ c
s s
v. "£ ? .S
a oo ^ fe
E .C M i
si I 2
341
-------
.
k
*
e
cj-
E
S
s
[73
>
2 -a a
5 C 2
u S £•*
£^5^
js 2 % E
S <
LO
CO ^
CO 13
to" g
"O
c
w £ N.J2 «
C -^ C 2 u
Ji ? =6 u '5
E _ 3 E cj
• 3 ^ "^ K ?5
-O CJ Tj ._ C
8 ™ .S 1 ™
•a .S M ra g1
C K <•> • - .5
« § 'S h3 -a
nilii
^ s ^
S s -a 9
| « 3 S
M a |
li 1 t I
| | E ?j S
o5 6 cl S
CO
0
E
S g
S °
f~ e
E o
- 3 „ _, xD
•a S 1 g^ 1 a
S^2^™-iE^
Mis:* •§ -s!
k-"-°— 5B_
.p9K«,o
t: « § ^ d a" ^ •§
S^^S^tJfSg
s|a^||,,--S.
beEnCcxico,
Cm • ° u "" ' u ™
• M "^ O ^ P O ™
•S S2>-6>&U
S^^^a^s-gb
«,"2 4?o y"jjo-5-;?
ffl3o.-™si'w;>
s •§ &i>^s bg
l/l.SBr-lSCN-oS
Onsite installation of concrete pad with berms
to mix offsite sewage sludge and fly ash;
application of lime (10 tons/acre) and potash
(80 Ibs/acre) on target areas; application of fly
ash and offsite sludge on target areas; and
application of grass seed, seedlings, and mulch
"8
tn
1
CA
0
Z
B
s
§ -a 3
3 co u-
O cj ^
E "™ ^
u- o"-a
o .c c
— N CO
•s | E"
« g 3 Oj
^2 C3 -p T3
l-sll
Q B 3 -o
<
d.
cj"
C
N
§ «
S ^
e o
CO O t«
d. O T^
CO
o S 4) _ .2?
s.iiii
Sllill
^? a, S ,2? «J = o
A v_y ? C TD 13 («
1
J2 T3 w
41 c 13
~^l
C C T3
5 Ji c Si
E E 3 b
i K 8 5
S '=^42
•^ JT u nj
s ^5 §> -S
2 < > - S
l^ljl 1
IIIll 1
Slope modification, capping, and application of
a vegetation cover on the residue bank;
construction of SW diversion channels;
SW/leachate collection and treatment using
lime-activated filtration lagoons and/or
constructed wetlands; implementation of an
inspection, monitoring, and maintenance plan;
and wetlands restorative measures, if necessary
No further action
!_l
ii
o 13 _«J
°. E 9 3
g -s jg I1 5
W w y 72 *j *5
t-~ g 2 $ o a
CN a Q. £ Z CO
t/2
•a „ "O
c -S S
18 -5 M "
& •« 'S "ra"
o si "3 i
- CO CJ
S .S .E E
S E « .3
Ulii i
on u c u N z
2 ^
.1 I *
N £ o3
-------
o
o
o
§" c-
•I
23
.1 .§•
11 •a .1 § c
i=l «ll
i g •§ | f j
! P c S TR S
&i ^i-s
• -—, ?
oo -c-
.O CJ
g'S-S
|..r
^ QJ -rt
•a •£ .2
2i o u "
c 's ra .y
ro ffl -«5 C
&^
I
•
oo
c
Ov
00
§
•a
2
OJ
c
o
•a
o
U B la .
_-S 2
C
a
1
•8
e
1
o
t-^
I
«
^ S
343
-------
o
c_
3
II
O
'Bo
ill
S-s
•8
is
o
a
•S-S-g
= c 8
o o •-•
* u C
K a o J2
t>- •- -S S
5 -5 3 S
5 S S E
u
.
•o
8 & %
in o 1-1
11 si
SI II
a ^ e 2
™ § w •£ -a
.8 g I ^ 8 §
g -g > u " > 8.
° *g b8i- g 3 a
ffclll'S'S
•a's s * g « o
- s ^^^,-S-s
c K 5 s »~s *>
o c
8 S I
S Si
i-i w^ wi
J-'C
c -o
l-s
1 "S
« n
IB
il
i
1
E
"w n
o
s » ™
•p .S (T
s TS e
%3 S
1M
2 rt ,,r
Q.
344
-------
8
u
o.
3
§
u
•0-5
is
II
.S
-
|
!
o
.
•a
S
j= y
.tt H
5 «,
8 | ~ S
U5 O > «
I
s
'B.
S
•a
1C
u
3
C
.1
S!
\-, bO
V C
•S 'c
is
"- 5
II
•a
•i. -
>< X
,W CO
E- o
m-'S.
in m g rt
t, «A o. a.
T3
B
ra
Q.
a e
I &
•a .5
C Q,
« S
a 5
|-a
5 a
c -a „
O B S
•a TS g
60 ,
"8 '-3 '
°°" 3 8_ 1
».
o
o
113111
S's"B
1 u « «
s a-a S
60.C ™ "
•I £"8 o
|a^^
S.511
S3 > c "3 .
13 O tO Q. ".
1
•fi S „-
•
|"§| SB
O > «"
345
-------
I
u 3.S S feL-S
o
i -^
.O CQ
J! 2
I
8
•S
•s
co -5
•a
c nJ
l-s
§1
m o,
o ^
8s
"8
tc
1
111.18-
is-SS S.
o
.
-SI
js g
1 =
E co
•a ra
«?
. 8
111
"
1
e
00
00
u
vO 01
O rH
ra
c
S
£ S * -a
u u u e
"SS
,J CO CO
II
g 8
8 s
.
"8
«
•II
'E? a
> g
II
5 o
346
-------
V
1
s/5
1
ts
!
£
£
i
&
e -o a
peg
& ™8
sis
QJ £^ ^W
(S
J2
a.
3
C
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
£
e
1
c -a
QJ CU
.i 2
Soil, sed
contamil
4
a O
'IS
'&s
> g
II
5 0
CO
c
i
GW cleanup goals were provided
for six contaminants including
~a
c
treatment with discharge to SW; purchase la
construct a soil cover over the contaminated
13
_
T3
C
CO
.§
CO
e
nitroaro
1
8_
£f
cs O
(A Ci-
1
o
IS)
H
iS
area, and incorporate land into existing wild!
preserve
£•
'0
&
1 1
J 1
•a
CU
Area 2 - Relocation of ponds 1 and 2, follow
by backfilling with clean fill; and GW pump
and treatment with discharge to SW
"co
c
E
-a
e
(N
Area 3 - Installation of a soil cover; and GW
pump and treatment with discharge to SW
§/_^ *?
co 5g
3 -a S
|s g
Soil will be excavated to a 10"4
cancer-risk level for contaminants
present onsite, which is consistent
with the 10'* risk level for GW
Excavation and offsite incineration of tar
deposits; backfilling with clean soil; and GW
verification study
r«l
"R
0
tx
g-B
* £
•§•&
ro bo
C C
'i Is
CO CO va
c c 3
o o ?
u u a,
S3 K T3
^2 g
<
OH
CU
'^ VO «
cu oo e
^ 5} E
2 ° :
& & £
CO
Is
'a
S,
g
The remedy meets the
8.93xlO"5 increased cancer-risk
"O
r"
No action with continued GW monitoring; ai
implementation of institutional controls to
"8
(S
1
o
Z
£
1
"8
™ *?
c S
'5 "^
c 3
2 -0
c c
8 a
^ o
o >
s
iT
c
1
CO
level. Natural attenuation can
meet the MCL for benzene 5 ug/1
within a 5 to 10 year period.
prevent the addition of new drinking water
wells
.8
E
ro
e?
o
•a
c
benzene
I
S
|£
^1
5£
Additionally, WQC and standards
have not been exceeded
00 1
1 E
§ 1
O IN
1? I
n &
$ 5 o
w -ii «»
This interim remedial action will
comply with ARARs; however,
chemical-specific cleanup levels
were not provided
co co
< £
OH "
U
of ra
u OJ U-
£'! 1 s
i 2 i £
2.2 ^ ^ „
$ 3 S % £
CO
347
-------
U
,
"8T3
S I
I*
I "8
Is
•?s a -3
sll
§"§ 2 EP
illzf^ff-s
!la 111
9 o P S •>, a a
t/5 u > J5 x .E E
Q i> -
_- .2 E
s si
•a 3 «
E -a J
JS c —
« 71 S.
re C -n
u u .s
of drums and
I
.—
*o
1
re
1
i
T3
drum contents with offsi
or incineration, if
3
o
•s
S
s
1
60
E
B
1
3
•a
3
hazardous; grading, soil
•eplacement of two
M
»
of direct contact risk are
o
jT
V
rr
t2
o
domestic wells adjacent
controls including
1
.9
2
1
00
•c
Q
B
O
•a
1
E
JS
•a
E
re
1
•a"
i
00
B
•a
re
1
i
i
E
00
'E
1
00
E
•a
B
01
"a.
a
'w
C
O
constructing a new pond
i
00
3
institutional controls incl
00
c
'C
o
'c
restrictions; and GW mo
^ -S E
o'S g>|
i?ii
sll"5
a i « .a
I 1 s S
s ° c £
W U C O3
I a
^2 <:
•: O r?
CS ft r-l
o
o
o
4J tx
: -S S
^^^
°^i
8S
§ ™ -g
111
-
II
I
O ,-N
O S
°- s
o 3
s^ T1
O «
3
•a
C
3
348
-------
l
il
*8
o
Q.
i
a
£
-1-
O rc X ~
« . 60 C
E 3
-.2 %
*s
a P
(3 I
•8
.5 Si
S
If 1
1! 1!
!
re x2
^•5^
1 1
05/18/88
1st - Final
11
I8
l!
u o
o
^
E re
11
5Itf-a
S
is
l-s
§.s
S 3
§|
•o £
811
*o w re
C CO "•"
C CO K
O e U
11?
re ^ .5
IN 8
w a o
•S
5
/ \
°
d
O
349
-------
e -o a
| g 8
sis
K eurfj
|ao
"§
o
o
ex
3
I
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
I u
! 1
' "5
1 >
i a
4 CO
E
^
(X
'cO
£
^ c
*X rtl *^
E" 6.P %
n £? OJ
2 C fa IS
.sSfi
a a « £
•« s
c
o
'Eb
o
o"
o
o
towards
I
CO
•
!>s
9l
^
^
"O '>
C >
(0 "U
uT *-;
-o .5
0) g
"°.I
c/5 cj
c£
6
S
Amnicola
TN
*
S
O ^S
O Q
§ §£
M "O
^ §|
total cPAHs. GW
including chlorofo
chromium 890 ug/
use restrictions
„
fixation and onsite disposal; GW monitoring;
conducting a public health assessment five yea
after completion; and imposing institutional
controls including land and GW use restriction
r*i ^^
!>!
85
5
S 0°
.S
.E "§
11
(J ° —
C E/I
'« 2 1
Q oj .2
•| E E
O CO CJ
To
o
&
S
Is
03/30/89
350
-------
ill
1
tA
1
3
§
u >
f
PJ
S.u^
5 e
vi
-------
II
8.1
«
§
I
1
c .5 c
•= T3 —
3 "w "«
O > a £
H.
o
O > (3 .S B
1 S |
«t, e
P 2 a
**s
^t u
o "*
°°- "«
o -e-E u S ja"
it g51Ji
w ^ S > a o D. i
v & a
1? S
fQ U M
S 3l^ I
g
^
1
352
-------
a
a
3
i
a
! i
H O E__
'8
«- Si -2
; aS g^ e°S §>.£?«!
I -3 O B s- Q, X •*
1 XH CTlwTITS^
-
..5 re v
3
f
ig-e.-g-S.sfa -8.1
SS111I3 M
I S
.
I "S g 1 « i
MIS**
8 •« S s ;c ••§
c
re
S
1* 1
§1 S
§ 2
353
-------
t- "O £3
O C S3
> ^ o
QJ DM d(
£3
—
0
0.
c
u
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
:E
3
—
:M
w
5
Threat/Problem
fc.!
c Q. Q ^
^ >s ^
2 X 3 5
"^ c/3 bb 6
K ^
c
_g
*5o
I
,
§o
§ /_x §
o o .t; o
O 00 O. *-*
ro" co" 8 o
1*
c "S S
flj cO — ^ ^*
n « 1 'J to
n >< ~™ .£ W
y w ° Q
60 _ IS f °
'3 1 3 ^ "H
'5 60 " ^ -S
1 \^ 1" a
1 o 1 -g to |
^^115
V
60
C 0
f PCP contaminated soil and
li onsite incineration; backfil
minated soil; GW recovery, s
possible onsite GW treatmer
adsorption with discharge t(
O .ti 2 ia c
is ill
>< QJ *> C *t/3 3
U4 w > cQ 3 vj
\
8
o
oT
c
GW, soil, and sedim(
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCP, and
metals including
chromium
vT
§
W —
\O eg
C 00 .C
^ \ '
O 0? ft
U o £
^
§
o o ?8
o o _ O
° ° -~* o —
BBS °- S
§ ° 5, o g
co co S •-! n
c
5 S
Ji ">
Sj -g
4J ^ U
^ C £
w u .f2
& to >-
^ * u
S n I
Q.!S
-------
"S T3 i2
o e ss
S ™ ,9
> CJ
gig
&
Cleanup Goals
•^
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
E
3
1
a
S
>
?
E
_OJ
2
s
d.
^
(Q
Si
v^§
n «3 ^
ns *-5 ^ S
u e o y
X S 5 W
w u J5 c
«
•R
Q
vO
T3
CO
JS
4_- -C
||
"S a
(A tfl
c
"i E
jo g
1 8
S
[/) K
•5 <
^ —
T= 00 CO
•53 .2 oo e
1 » S S
1 3 5
E 1 1 2
•*
1
» ^
10 m ^^
CO C? vO ti
^2 « S /-N
S '& Sal
S^ sao
Pond water dilution will meet
Ambient Water Quality Criteria
a
ro
S-o
1 s
a °- &•
>f sediment with onsi;
i; RCRA site closure;
i discharge to tributa
controls
o -a -a
c -a 'g S
o ra * a
•a TJ |- .2
nj "^ 5 a
> "P -2 2
8 8 S|
a 8 -3 .1
<*i
"R
O
o
\o
"
-s
^ '5
C •— T3
e ^ S
c 4-1 ro
.5 ra w
•o c w w
lel'l
•gl-S &
Is 8.1
yT
TD
C
O
p-t ^_
^, \O W
^ w c
? £ £
— M '
sis
1-
•g
Q
^v ^, ^i O ^
tv CO g o CM g ^
S S 8 t fe Sfi S
Sfeal S^o
Specified preliminary goals for
soil based on MCLs to include
lead 166.5 mg/kg, chromium 3.7
mg/kg, benzene 14.4 mg/kg,
trans-l,2-dichloroethylene 76.0
ug/kg, toluene 971.0 ug/kg, and
PCB (Aroclor 1254) 1,050 ug/kg.
GW will attain the cumulative
10"s cancer-risk level which
includes MCL values for benzene
5.0 ug/1, toluene 175.0 ug/1, and
lead 50.0 ug/1
~ T3
3 g^
U-4 _, -5
O J2 too-—
^ c ^
u -5 .5 ?
C 5 T3 ij
S-s&S
?. u
'g "S I e° E?
S 5 E -I ™
8-2-3 £|
32.2 8=5
fi O
•5. 8
o o"
0 O
CO O yl
rx" f-f 13
r-i VO 60
•a
JS C
i—1 ro
? w vT
„ U Q3
S TB "2 y
""* J ITt p
O ra hi)
C w bo
"S 1 ° -E „
!|d = l
3 8 g .1 I
§
S
J=i CO
OJ ^
60 M
Sbi £ 2
T)-
1
vO *
« § i 1 —
i— i .— oo s i—
tN o. ,(.- S 2
«" S ^o.??
w» >ii «A vS^Cj
Soil will be excavated to the
10"4 health-based risk level which
includes lead 100.0 mg/kg. GW
treatment will attain MCLs for
VOC contamination which include
1,1-dichloroethane 5.0 ug/1,
methylene chloride 5.0 ug/1,
trans-l,2-dichloroethylene 70.0
ug/1, tetrachloroethylene 3.0 ug/1,
toluene 340.0 ug/1, and
trichloroethylene 3.0 ug/1
V, D
60 "•*
~m *r-1 60 ^
2 — >• ?P BS
«j TI 3 > .E °
| H "S U | "3
>iii;i
§9,= a « -a
.l,85ls
C a"Rgs ^
M 8 ^ ^ I
o 0 m n 0 -g
!.-§ ° «r=3
c 5 e "m c n
-^ =§ •= 1 i 1
s s i -1 1 *§
N. •ri ™ "Q D
^1 ^^ fa-S
•s i u 1 -g -s
s| a iS §;;
— 1 -S ° n. ?
^ a &-s at
*-i o ra *c 3 1;
C/3 0 0 ? D.T3
J2
ra
n 60
1L o
X 0
§o
in °
"I 0
w-s
.c U 2
*3 L_i BJ
3 «E
^l|l
U cc .2
e ^ *
"S 1 % y
OS CO M S
= E §•§
cX 8 > ra
_:
u-
m lv "«
O 00 C
U ^ E
T3 rH I
S 1 2
Tf
355
-------
of
edy
Compon
Selected
•R
£
c
*S
SfS
•g
ra
V o
8 "
g 2
.sssksiss-ss
E
' 0 .2 E o
v-< 73 _3 a •
efS-S
e T3 .5 3
1 2
E 5£
S
8
S85ISJ
, I fl s ™ |
o a j§
^ 'a ^ §
. CQ '5! 1-1 J
:=- I
r a i-/
:t S:
• S
0 „. o s u« u1?
°£? 2- «=C? Or=" •=«
S.§ si af slg ilg
i ii II gi an In
S
M!
li!\
S B «-S
Ji
; rs |
5^.^-S
>ls|
£
£b
o K
i!
ST?
4-1 (Q
* ..
w OJ
e »-
6E
1 =
g JS
e-Q
S u J2
s-sg
> J2 C
u5 8
"S
tc
o
O > !3
.E eg--
fc .. S
_ "O t/5
ill
— ^ W
i-?a
J2 fe 5
8 ^^
"8 ff
§> a
io e
J§^Q
"•s a
^ e 2
O O
B
E ^~
a BO s
w js t;
1
Ill
IB -
rt nj rs
sll
I
2 la
i
01
356
-------
41
3
.2
~
' Decision Summary
"8
Record
S
§2
(N
i
£
C T3 £3
O C ^
1 SC§
|l|
cu
(A
"§
O
U
0.
3
C
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
V
E
3
o
£
s
&
E
u
3
Threat/Pro
^£§
«r «> ffl 3
lla*
™ iC1 U
2 oJ 3 -"2
S3 a |) E
V3 £
C
O
'5b
&
'
1 o « IT?
°" °" S -? 1
0 ° 5= -S »s ~
u\ in^ i) C So
V» Wi «» £? J O »J
4j ^ C
2 w ^ ^ .9
C <• OJ C *-J
u a S & a j2 §
ss « 2 cs 3 - 8 E
3« Q^S^MXiS
•S "i *a2'S^.--2
S g S 3
|& "1-8
Z. 01 r-.v2.T3
•S T3
'5 > C
5 > ra
V 0 £ -
S so -a •> BO g
M c c * c .2
.E T3 ffl "O T3 E
E 2 w- ffl 3 -a
| = | 5 c c S
§ » 1 •« B « .a"
§11 *il!l
Oeu c^oEn^i
=" & 2?
3 •= .S
2 ^ Ti P
4-1 CO OJ 1C
c S - E j 12
1 i s J Si ! s
8 =>3£?oj^
& 3ro'Sati«
I« 2 i 1 3S ^ 1 s
•* •*
s
0 ??
1- s°
g" 2 3 §
« 'S. 55 E
sfs si
^
o
E
&
•p
X
I
(U tt
I-3
•" eo
^1
ai
< E
"e3 *o
S* i™, tu . «
^3 "S §
"
S S "w
-i § B
> .E P •-
^ Irfl
o 8 >.E
__-
CH
•g
5
S S S
| s° s
1^ 1 I
•*
§ ^
S"l
in a.
sS
-s
1
0
z.
c
_o
M
? ™
C o
ra £
..
-------
c-o a
O c g
*Hl (^
1
O.
3
C
ra
U
-•£
1 §
| B!
a|
Volume
t/3
ra
E
2
E
OH
JS
ll
sll
c
o
'So
&
• / — \
II 1
Illlll
- ~ tM (i Ui n
5 8 3. E si
» "
8s
1 a^
ill
I-
•S
'B
_ _0 w
« g s
13 01 u
a-E -s
03 C vu.
|ll
ill
— Co
1 1 1
•> QJ fS
111
»^
o
o
00_
-C
i!
11
2! 1 I
ll S a
S W 0 r2
*
go | o||
|| a 1 1 s § | .§ g s
2 8 -a | g f S S 2 8 "§
« « s y S. S "S2a2
(AWO.ES? (A>-StS«S?
o
m
"> c
S % S
S5 — J5
P S
*? c d
c-g-3
"• £J « S yj ^«
..« «> o h |
l§
S, ">
'.hJa
i :s-
: .E -a e
js -5 e ^
^ii &-
LH
E -a
V ra
•a Hr S SS-s
C> c _, t- .« 5
^ QJ t* Q pa CD
o o e °3 >
**3 *O g _ ^T ? ^
2 a S § I
S g. g,| I
"8
(C
o
_ Q
01 S 5.
•S 5 2
C
dJ
1
T3
C
1
o
"O
c
ro
0
2
01
1
•|
^
S
'e
ra
8
1
o>
CO
•3
3
.1
i
u
2
c"
o
•a
1
01
c
01
3
2
u"
^
V
c
1
JU
2
OJ
•g
03
S
£
"g-
•a
c
03
c
S
!5
1
E
1
S
J3
00
_c
13
00
00
CO
J5 j: o ;:
2 U U £
358
-------
u
as
a «
nBo'5
P 8 ^ w1
! - 2 °
1.1
2 c S o
3 T3 C
6 c e .o
^K '13 ^
E E •-
o 2 S 3
§
O G
'
8
I
I i S
qj Pi
CO CO "ffl "O
E e o S
a ° ° BO
fe 2 v "So
*.S-ca
S y « °
c3 ^ *""*
4-J" £ O
B .g S £
cy to ^
ft 3 gj *^ 5?
„ C 3 C
'S ™0 "5 1
1/5 "y t-i .5 1-1
"8 BO
I "S'E
i^>.iii
If si-S §
O ° T3 N ., C
15 "S § 5 S «
•a ™^5 Re
III "=5 8.
.52 co m w fij
1|| || §"5
.2 " 'B .1 'o 1 ^
" -a g -3 •*• ™ c
S — •« -^ 2 -S oT
s i J1 i E -a
"S.S-C
W5 OJ
o t« a
a.
0"
t/3
2
•S -d -s
o -x £
,.§• i
\ W
8 ^2
s .g "- s
s-& s g
1
c .S -a
•s -a c
E 3 n
2 T! -
c c w
5 •= y
u u; &
O
-£ t-
oo _-
: x •" c
1581"
iJliilP
1 "si"SiI p§
u5 ja .5 re S .E o m
BO
v fo 2 „ =3
*3 ~ AI 2l Hr
bi S
1ii!i!
| § § g .5 o
5 -rr ^, c2 O wa
•s « S g -a.
5 .s a 1 i
c
-------
J3
g
O
D.
3
C
I
§| i|
S3 si
a
CO
O
"8
M
_e
o,
CJ
3
n
o
•a
co J2
||
l-s
S's
§5
51 §
N -
§
I
o. S .
1
£»J O
u. o
=1
'
I-a
^d
U S
•g
•si-s
""S3
Si!
in
iii
.a
"£3 "O -3 _t«
111!
W O 13 0
H3 -S M w
S'Sll
•« -P 5 S
sill
5 8
13 OT
-
,
l§'g
§tE
s 5
a "S -o
•a e c
all
o
5
1
5 £
u S
5 S
O Js
r-( (X O rl
s
o
S- I
I S
360
-------
•at
0
to
13
I
5
1
core? P* —
r-i g co 2
co .s >o g
*" & "f c
s! d^,
o
•§
O <
ft O
a
I
Is
S £
S» %-.
If 31
fe 3 s s
II
2 2
~% s
i-a
' '
to
I
•s
i
I
D.
O
I
•a
S
s
361
-------
O
a.
Components of
Selected Remedy
nated soil
, soil was
team strip
and GW
e to SW
tamin
hing,
itu ste
halt;
harge
I w 8 '? 8
n
flus
in-si
asph
disc
0 -
jo- £ S
CN s — ' t/) ^— '
c"S=e s
to " g -a
.
?
E
t/3
it
y Si
< « S
' ra u
o •> H
CO > <
55
*
(S
s-a s
co- s i
<& O
GW clea
SDWA M
carbon te
(MCL)
ontinued operation of the existing
ntercept/ treatment system; installatio
dditional extraction/monitoring wells
"8
tment system; and
nt, GW concentrations,
fication o
itoring of
ping rates
odi
m
mon
pum
^•s
*- O
8^ S=
K_ U S° w 'fl
^ o S £? a
o > s o &
S 8J
12
_ 3
sll
a; a
o »-i
362
-------
S3;
la<
Cl
p
S »J
g Bi
H
6S
o w
" 'S.
§ '0
3 -2 *
£l£S|
'S s e? e a
•
V L.-.ti «J >
•c E e 4^ ^
" a o c o
o E e g «-
lalfl
o
•S $ - -2 g? 2
1 k s g •§ g>
e '
6 > a o
o
o
o
§2
tV OH
>5 S
's u gf 1 ^s<
_
--2
.
SLffl-S-s
«
gi 8 Il| g
^3 „, a co c
^ S to 3 S
p '« .Of "3 ">
S g 1 6 S
|
"5.
Tf s S g S s .s .s
O CO
i-i 00
13
v
ra S? S
•s i -2
I1S^
e c oT ^
§•==•?.
U ys 1J X
& H C ^
O > ^ M
j= 2
w QJ
"Q ." W
111
1st
5
363
-------
u
o.
3
B
u
s
s
-
S o
§Ia
JSl
"8
IB
o
II
B
O
•a
o
1
O o °
v0-- § -a
S.| Si
o
u"
E
S
S
to
X
S
2
1/3
£
Signature I
•a
C)
Remedial A<
c
.2
v*
O
b
u
£
09/21/87
"ra
B
E
4»l
VI
c/3
'B.
to
co
03/29/85
1st
t/3
Wamchem,
ca
Industrial F
06/30/88
"! §
§
GW cleanup goals were based
Federal AWQC and include:
benzene 0.7 mg/1, toluene 5.0
mg/1, xylenes 2.0 mg/1. Soil
cleanup goals were based on
estimates of contaminants that
a c
•|J8
-I*
to -° bo
c *o .S
C flj V5
•g,
o
Cvf
GW and SW quality should m
State primary drinking water
standards. Soil and sediment
be removed to background or
C
I
"B ll
CB w
ex? 4!
|s -a
as B
E'l'i
•« 0 5
6 0 5
O g_, ^
•g o-S
E "3 »
£3 > E
S ° 'S.
s e s
8 g g
13 tr<
> B K
? 01 u
b§^
§ g T3
c/3 is flj
1
1
V)
o
Z
&
1
S
*C
r
IS
•o _
B ^ =6 «
"J S 3 6
=1
.a-3
s n Ss 3 ° E
>- s y S •§ •« S
I 8 S 11 S •&
«
•E ^ ^
0) .— O
.w &. CO
Is ^
_E
b
364
-------
E -0 J3
.p c se
^ « ,9
"> eS
fl
£ ill
£ "-S'i
«2^S§
73 60 S O >
*l?'8^
" *? > » _
imen
idual tes
osal; G
of tr
sed
T, ^f g>»
C .,^> ^ =
" cTJ: « §
n: .2 a 5 5
-
•a
4J i
S «
1S"
c ^
2U
4^
S"S
^s "
- S
X ^
«!
II;
o* bo
J— c
j^ 'B,
c a.
2 S
.S «-
§2
» u
o E
.
lill
™ 3=5.5
S '£-•«
o S.S «
JS
•Sri
w ex S
S g £
Li. JJ (S
.
S & S 'I
w S =8 8
«A o O a.
£ S
* S
£ 'S c 2 = E
y < '" ** $°
& u a -
^4
. * „
Zll
2ui Jb eo
o * "-S
1 _ S- •«
=5 £ S 1 ob
t- "O in" 2 Si
O C bo «" _
ra 2 3 •= c o
— e cr ;
•? S
s a
o = g ^5
1
365
-------
1
1^3
sll
l*°
1
o
Q.
3
1
°
o-r
S E
i *
8.TJ
II
g
8 -5 of w
I'SSS
•Sisffi
slili
^ E-il o
G 2 .E .S .5
j
E
1 8
1 I a
in
c ^,
w S
flj gW
v&l S
o S o
v* f v>
w
S
1
re
O
Z
.§ "o '3
CX qj
Illfcg
;,, 2 U t5 •§
I Ssla
I|jjj
fc -g"^ E H
^ S. ^ § -3
z 5 B JL 2
V
Z
.8
0 &
Z w
e -g
° -5 S
Soil and GW
laminated wi
petroleum-rei
releases
fi i
s? 1
ii ii
in
o? S
"X 4>4
g ^2
366
-------
Ill
S-i.
§3
II
S
fe.
co -
fc
13
c
M
O\
CO
•- c 5 S 5-
•a to u JS ra
— o
'§S.
QJ A
-a .S
f S
I «
II
-rfT Wl
§
S §
c$
s
367
-------
v
co
a
33
**
I9
4J S
nj Cl<
g<3
D.
"JS
O
a
§
1
S
fcfl
P a
'SJ 5
>
"8
I
1
i!
S
1
£
tfl
5
i
3
1
>
§
1
a
"co
H
E
D;
c
O
"Si
a;
rt
co
CO
Ov
of
to
co_
co"
w
f
1
1
CO
CO \«
?s
i
O
4^
"§
£
S3
1
ti-l
O
s
M
3
2
ws
a
1
1
CQ
1
CO
s
s
^
g
CN
tC
•s
1
•8
1
^
I cancer-rii
I
I
*-o
ftj
1
o
£
I
S
1
•a
1
s
'e
a
8
s
<~s
U
1
1
B
P
i
(A
3
•8
2
S
X
OJ
u-l
o
^j
g
E
S
I
•g
*B
S
1
1
•8
•g ^
antaminati
0
1
an Chemicals,
1-1
o
5
in
•3
_3
"^
_C
.S
B
§
s
1
•a
c
CO
a.
o
o
°5.
in
v>
~S
i
1
.a
13
s
1
i2
B
<0
4i
o
.•s
'S
•s
(JT
'S
E
E
CO
9
1
1
S
!
s
•a
^
i
CO
3
C
1
|
K
SJ
S
J2
1,
60
J-8
11
U VI
-a
J
1
CO
1
•8
&
1
c
V
E
8
H
« _ o w
°_ C? O —
§2 °. 3
'5, r s
8" 5 Bl
•a D
1 E
•§ * .1 = ° 8 3
-------
si
S, fc"-a re .
(Tl
'0 "5 M is a
g, P -B BJ 'C
S. 2 "5 Si
? o- s §
li"*
u e
Si
§"*
: ~ S 2
"8
(S
1
o
^
•g 1 «S
•=" m i- w
•S c » ir bo •« -S
^•§^ a c^2 c o
C.2 Qj^S ™T3
ttS^N^u-ae
Ss-=S"oES™
a"
E V
5g"§.OS-S.3l
0>nea.-2Ea
ra
'C
3
$ -5 s
S II
fO t/i
O r-t
°. s
I!
§1
2 §
£•2.
eg v
•35
-iifli;ni
Slfe-cSSlail
O^-2uwJt;5'5!<
8
C ns
n .c
O 2
es oo
"2 -S -E
SI'S!
»
-------
>
"CM
1 ™u
1 13 S
OH
tn
O
O
o.
3
e
S
0
Components of
Selected Remedy
; tU3
U o;
& 8
•g
(Q u
.3 CO
Provision of home carbon treatment un
bottled water as an interim alternate w
•8
IS
'u
o
2
4_>
'S W"
GW contaminated
VOCs including TC
Byron/ Johnson
Salvage Yard, IL
m
S
o
|l
S J,
c
nj
1
C
8
1
_8
c
metals, and inorgai
including cyanide
09/23/86
2nd
o
o
Us
rH",S i
g
Isl
— - J5 §
*S = c
Ja'S 8
I| i
§*^ '!
c (/" ra
S H e
u^ 8
"3
1 »
E T
a s
Removing wastes generated during the
investigation; covering, regrading, and
revegetating surface; GW and SW moni
•a
aj
"S
'u
g-
o
4-i
'S
GW contaminated
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, and
1
e
« =3
m
o
o
5
b
C *c3
aj ~^
Is
™ <0
*-J
55
"c js
If
73
U O1
Si
a"8
w u
13 3
plugging and abandoning monitoring w
longer in use; providing an alternate so
T3
60 C
C ra
TCE; metals includ
arsenic, chromium,
Waste Disposal/
Dumping Area
S
oZ
"ro
3
c
c
"8
QJ
.5 v.
03 U
03 'C
flj "O
— §
!"§
"H ^
^3 ^
I S
en C
'o
.E T3
E ^ a
drinking water by extending the water
the municipal system; and implementinj
institutional controls including GW use
lead; and other
organics including
cyanide
06/30/89
deed restrictions
•E
m
rl „
^ o ^
N <-^ C "9
Si ^1
co a. 2 >
-" S 5S S
w >i On,
1
I
!«
|
o
£!
Excavation and offsite RCRA disposal o!
drums
1
'u
W)
O
t/i
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, and organic
including PCBs
§
Cemetery Dump,
09/11/85
1st
m
g
|
8
u
3
1
Q.
a.
(0
8
H
§
?
-------
Compo
Selected
s
•^ 08
3 O
1 |1
s si
l§|
111
2 g S
3 S o
S
2
f?8
U BO —
'iS c ra
So g
«I K_ ra 'C
•S I w.2
1-sll
e 3 g —
!
I
f
^ w
"U c"i
lr
1 =
llw
8-:S
^o-g
O > a
•s ">
S 00
I ^
« n
•g
CN
51
.§<
M CC
li
o S
o-B
gl
C ^
^ i
Si
a. ..
..
Ill
o
•a
B
CO
S I jV
1'e
« CO
I Si
/.-•a J8
;5 2
j U QJ
».£ 6
co g
I I
O r=
00 S
rf£6 81
S3 cu -a
i^§s
11 2 «f
2 ~ . s
g-S S*
°r^ 8
E -a
.2 g
ao
£
•a
3
"u j«
.S ^
B|
E a.
g"E
S
1
•a
Sl«
> co B
-II
>T eg o
> ^ C
-8fl:
C (U O "
n!
=P a •£ f
Sj'Si
*•!
u-.g|
CU CJ
ff-S
§•"
o -a
g>g
;:-.§ 8
£ 5, ti
« S o
Vt -^ V)
B
°£
O
1
O
"8
2
371
-------
a.
3
C
s
u
8
1
£14
1
0-5
i * »• 5 ••
Bi
-------
Q.
1
f, x 3 .a
I 111
11 IJ
gllsll
a s
M | 2
111
V 'u ?
Ill
bo e .5
C CJ C
*3 -a —
'
'c e •
O K M a,
I
o
" w
.
1 =
1 1
U > ra
5 I
oT _ "3
•si- II
O !3 •-< i
w S E o 01
8
o
-S
5
~ o
o "S o
« zs
^H * »M
V) U U
Excavat
contami
residual
O "& u
-a — S
b " .S
C w to
3 -g M
OJ P fO O)
be " (& So
Ili
-
C T3 "C C
x
01 o
£^1 0
5 2 JS ffl
"8
is
o
s
'
£
"S-s
£t
Sn
Soil, sediment, S
GW contaminat*
Z
E"
01
js
o
,p!
w
in
•a
c
VOCs, organics
including PCBs,
inorganics
&
IO
CN
1
£
Brook sediment
K
0
•g
«
en
2
E
in
£
contaminated w
w
^
60
_C
^
3
U
_q
>
S
^
ro
0?
O
S
I
w
K
•o
c
n
•a
including PCBs,
metals
2
J
•a
GW contaminate
|
u"
[J-
in
w
^
'•3
|
>
373
S
cs
o?
o
-------
Record of Decision Summary Table
£
g°
K?
b
N
§2
E
C T3 J3
s S s
5 J- U
•M S 5
S "S. ^
SuO
a.
CO
"s
O
o
ex
3
c
O
Components of
Selected Remedy
u
E
3
5
>
OJ
I
(U
2
£
^>
s
S
$ i
|"|S$
CO cC OJ —
^ " *-< (tj
«j 3 =3
a S s n
K 1 .§ 1
t/a ps
'5
0,
P*
I S
°-— ^
m 2 S
a -a s
~ 3 o
Vj Cl* y^
1
§ *o
KJ hA
CJ t* J|j
||g
•- W5 m
CO 5j ™
ii g? b
U .5 «2
T3
Excavation of sludge and sediment and remc
of aqueous lagoon wastes with solidification
and offsite RCRA disposal
CO
CO
<•> M
T3
?- 8
o o
o *-^
S 2
•* rH
en
u jc Ta
G -c (3
1 s 1
la-E
« CO CO
•sl.s
™ 2 g
=3 § E?
t/3 O O
S
u"
I -
5 §
£ oo
O vo to
ffc O r^
LT)
8 I
8 Oo
OS 0-3
53 S 2 "> §
*- S e 2 c
8& 1 11
I°S.
*— t- bO l*~l O
O QJ c wa C
•pS 2 § K
fa £ ^ oo u
0 •=! -C a 5
8 .a £ g j« '
8 1 S § .S
g •* c Js S
|§S"|
^11^
•a'g| o-al
tu co — « -e S3
i §£b! S.
rt 8 o ° .5 S-
v -Ti
T3 -c -a c cu
r- ^ C n ni
Removal and offsite incineration of drums ai
associated contaminated soil, followed by
installation of a containment system around
landfill including a RCRA cap, slurry wall, a:
a dewatering system with a leachate collectii
treatment and disposal system; access and di
restrictions; and GW monitoring
CO ( ^
E -a
?, -a ra S
__ _. " ^"
o 91 8 '3 -a
o o o S"s
rSJS, rfB$
8 .a
'S 2? "2 S
&T3 .E g g
, E? c -a ra co
C O CO J3 nJ-
3 6 £ S S .s
> 'I 3 - 5 -a
^!^si
"Ss-s>l-;|
™ 1 "i -o- " -i -
=§ 'a 1 g g S -s
c^ 2 .E K P S a
H
;g
'c
Is- I >
> 13 cu -c =3 5^
s g b s e «
§5. < a •§ JP
g .a ^ "S g <^
& O 1-1 iS J o
in
o
O
O
cf tf
3 S S"
o M -5
o" W
CO C
374
-------
>
!"§
1 ™
i-l
I3
%
*o
1
1
5
Site Name,
State/Type/
ignature Date/
C/J
a
1
«
"s
o
o
o.
3
1
"8
4J
W5
ffl
£
E
V
3
S
a.
>
£
H
E
O
1
~n
H
rt
E
.0
'00
a;
B;
0
1"
fO_
V)
1
t/3
I
's
J2
I
0.
a
1
5
•a
CJ
ro
.S
'35
3
c
1
03
E
'5.
g
O
"8
ta
g.
&
o
j=
1
*o
CJ
CO
.e
3
o
u
^
O
8
^dblum Industri
S
in
E
O
•o
3
TJ
_E
J2
<$
I
&
I
i
ir
§
i
Q
OJ
So
u
"1
^
1
1
1
3
00
.£
"u
c
*3
o
>
§
!
•a
c
03
^
3
to
tk
3
in
OJ
c
1
00
E
|
1
B
i
T3
C
cd
^
,
a
§
s,
OS
o
S.S
5S g
O > .S
OJ
11
II
I
a. E
a 3
S| g*h
iiilw
"still!
00
.ft
•g §.
if
llill
lOj.BSSg.gt
g-^^ £5 s g-S
o -t:
I'M
o- E T3 "
'g 5 jf 8 -n 2 -a
fa J a =3 || jg
C T3 -O 9S E .S -S
-
80
o ^-^
"S^
18 •= J2
5 * oo 2
u TJ B aj
. a =3 E
= B-2-o
•- 1 -S
^ § 'S I
•• O CO "pi
tn 'to o E
uj K
_ O
•a -o
1 §
= u 'C
~ I?
42 ^5
3 ,3
I
375
-------
V
3
£
^
c
n
P
Decision S
•8
1
8
£
&>
£
£
N
P
£
•^
"g ng a
113
111
| 3 8
J2
S
o
D.
3
C
S
D
's-s
a g
Componeni
Selected Rei
o
B
"o
S-
a
CO
5
B
z
£
!
N. C
a c
1 JL<3|
z \ 1 "«
.§ § In
W yi OO r
i/3 B!
c
c
'5b
c
cc
^-\
§a 8> n> E
f -5 -S u .2
M 5 op | k, E |
Ill-all!
•° s % ° ° - »
•§ 1 -s « ^ .9 1
- S S 'g 'g S 1
•^3 C ?S •-— »^H be Ti
5 Sg-g-S f.E
Is •"? -a E
"2 S E "2
C « f« C
B
ra
0/87
~
i s
376
-------
>
t= -g a
o S S
£ a O
a a s
Its
(X
J2
O
i
ot
{2 E
c cu
c *
8.TJ
11
3$
cu
E
3
"3
^
CU
VI
5
e
2
1
S
S .2
ciT ^ 5 S
2 Xs 3 .^
.Sail
1/3 all
in &,
c
.0
If
1 0 ^
01 ° o d o —
8 8" S .9 8 3
j? * CN g- 10 g
1
"Q g JJ
— ^ re
C C CO
Q O O
§ -3 60
SB 2 0.
i •- 3
i'g §
? s-
18 SB^
7 '!•§ 8
i s;sf
Isll
60
To -C
c o
| 8 1 |
E co £ fj .« E
CO e co 'O _ *^ 60
£ s c a fo -a -
t)'| S.1 ^§!§
•s s-a a> u » s,
O ys «— U 00 aJ ~"
•§8§ xiyi
ffl 55 (^ CQ 03
- "g 8 13 ^ c>
S « s T ^ -S 5
•8 i*a|.-a S-g
c 1 J! r. ™ S? «
o 2 o £* ^c > • «
'fl oc •— a? S2
islil^l
e 5 '"° @ E u '£
rS '5 0 « B § 8
U > CJ & C u b
T3
C
§CO
'o "^
o~ •£> w 'S
CO "5_ CO CO
^-^, S E
C > OH
Sgrf
o T, E~ ' £
T= S c= e
C CO ^- CJ
™ .S 3
== E tl "9
5 2.S g
E?
2 E
'E 5» "°
«i 1 co
u ==
CN
1
E
3
'1
e
j=
CJ
CO
c
E
H
8
ri
!,
•o
'!!
I" 8 ^ -S E
f
w
377
-------
D.2
^-^ f
a -5 .S
|l fiif
W a S, re re
a
1
I
2
•a
•s-S
|l«
^ o y
= •
o 8
.j
"re
'C
u
> .S
m i
I B jj I i
"I A a e 8-
v
>
= S= S
S x O o
> a; K c:
TD T:
e B C
B re «
o
o
in
s
I
s
35 s
o a
- re
Sil
O
s s
aj
£ a
2 g
g I
u C
•8 8
§ °
s £
T! ffl
B V,
1
•3 g-
e o
=
I
\O Wi
il §
tf O, ^
a" g o
O o
x oo
So
o
o o
"8
ta
1
o
•i i ^
a SSI'S
s " s a ™
*-1-g-5* s
^_, *o £J w 5 'e
° -^ s I s a
•s re __, u-
E oo^ o
». - re .5
J-sll-a
_re
a,
<£
•J
o
CO
I
CO
c
S
378
-------
U
0.
3
C
Components
Selected Rem
•a
44
§c? o
.2 §
8 g- §•
g£ £
•o v-
SS-2
e "a c
I*-S
M*S
fa w e
Sew
v S c
4J .52 O
e s u
3 § •*
"5. 8 .2
!•=!*
S S C oo
a | s^
oj n« W
|SS2^
D. i
C, t
'C !
«3 §
.£ « E
"« i_i c
3 OJ O
S3 «
IS 15 -a js
Sir g
E
Jill
X fc
1
Wl T-]
T3 1 g1
c ™ W
19 C ^
111
s
"8
SI&B
2
a
.S Q
S
•
S? .S
£ £
« .
x. „
ON («
O rH
•g-a
S 0
HI
El!
o
o
o
o"
o
o
§ll
111
2
OH
BO
!
a
'0
'e "a
23
5 u.
S
379
-------
\
1 *<3
|aS
a
1
*»
Components of
Selected Remedy
' V
1
1
1
^
Threat/Problem
a .§
v 1? ^ 8
ra P <" -
2 \ 3 .5
.sill
1/2 w^
c
o
'So
n and maintenance of
vision of three private
Is; and additional GW !
£P-5 'S 8 "B !»•>
"O ro ? . „ $
I'i Sll§
o
o
o
o"
rH^
Soil, SW, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PAHs, and
inorganics
60
60
22 _
m — tv co
• _- °° 3
o is o *
c " '
1,3 8 2
U)
£
0
o o •»
o o *
O u O u
\" C s~* r^ C
Sal s a o
O OJ
",€
° 11^2
l-r|S|
O O eg w —
Q "O QJ "" QJ
« 2 "S S «
111 111
III Iff
^ S
c ^
g S ,3 w
"" ni ^
S E b c&
1 1 ^ ^
^< ra O O^ M
2 J rH O rH
in
o
o
o^
Sa
1!
F!
§•1
C "
Is
•a 3
E^
U— i
O
C
o
s
ffl
•a
oj ra
to p
§ S
ra 05
S w
x 5
^
o
CO-
rH
C >
8g
&'i
O 2
E
c
,3
2
0
2
tu _
S S
in
380
-------
& e
c
-------
e -g a
c •§ S
§ Q °
cu
i/i
§"~*
O
D.
C
CO
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
x u
1 ~™
' «u
< w
^
1
2
(X
>
g
fS
^^1
-- i> 03 *3
E|°^
2fS3
•sSfl
w«.&l
yi PS
1
es
o
o
0^
•^•
oC
3
ffl
^
y
1
D.
13
^
'§
•^
1
Excavation and onsite consolidation of ash
,
O
§
'~i
c
o
5
C5
"§
~
&
£^
'§
's
in
c , s
tS tri
-5 i
£
"8^
S "§
"§ —
8 §•
S CO
J5 0
cy
1 i
V3 "^
II
wastes and soil into landfills with capping of
landfills and previously excavated areas; GW
o
O '
o_ "53
-. .0
V
wi C
Q <"
n ~^
£*
*£ W
? ^
13 bo
«j -S
ll
2.S
a
Incinerator, (
8
o_
S s
*°_ 08
SS
u
rn" U g fe
^ "5 c S.
° « S 8
s — « S
§ | ° |
,3 "» -a S
5 '"? S C
CJ " ^
° § ^S
•^ u c —- 1
I'sll
pumping and treatment with discharge to
POTW; vapor/vacuum extraction of liquid
disposal area using carbon filters; continued
testing of soil, ash, and tributary sediment;
a
c
1 S-JT
'3 _§• g
ffo*
C "U
i- l^ •—
3d 3 "O w
o "3 w"^
•5 EC "0
S .a °- B
^ !(f-a
g 0 0, CO
1|>
Incinerator/\
Disposal Faci
06/30/89
co *o
provision of an alternate water supply for are
residents and businesses; and implementation
deed and land use restrictions
13
g
^
_3
^
'«
1
S
To
o
o
5
I
«
i
.2*
3
H
bo
1
?
U
W "? cf
^ § S
'o
11
b C (8
C ™ "c
S W " ,j
fe .§ J js
1-1 S W tg
"^ c1 S ~
•"* jj .5
|£~ |
•q _M u. aj
Ilsl
its
Installation of new soil/clay caps for lagoon
and landfill and in-situ solidification/
stabilization of sludge and landfill gas flaring,
necessary; site monitoring that includes GW,
SW, and landfill gas monitoring; offsite GW
IS
J*— 1
tA
3
•z
'$•
V3
•a
c
«
.,
g
— -
&
1
i
in
w"
^J
•£ T3
•5 C
f BO ™
ID .S W
^ 1 S
c *u - "nJ
'i •- = I
1 § CT3
8>'2 "
1
"B
C i -^
1
S <;>•
0,^7 jj
s
CO C
3 §•
•8
c
1
ui
I
13
Interim GW treatment using granular activatei
carbon and air stripping
"g
tc
i
o
2
x
'5 w
[ ]
1s
ra S?
c .S
'11
2-i
§-s
^ O
O >
2
s
e S
2|
S la
E 03 -g
2 II
l/>
/— \
s-§
o e
CO flj
-------
•R
<* 2 ^
£ -a s •§
*^ f« -W C
O
.
I
D.
60
•a s
u Sfi
°l
6^
£2
O
sj?
g-S
£8
O >
c S-
O Cu
•
O
"8
s
§
z
e^>
II
j» a g 3
is sTl
(fl Ci S
II I I HI I I 111 i i II!
5 <;
£>
f*
|
I
8
§s
5 r? <" E 6
S^5 | 13
5B2 8 £
"S
o
"S
O > to
III
2
'a
2 5
sf 3 N '3 x
I "8 s^^ |s
Sji «|^g'§n.§
!**SlsS*i
•a-plr, *«33co-s
gBSttZ0-5i56
*1 I 8*I^« 1
§-Jf BlM^Bl
G2g,e"a«s"3J-o
||||-||5t§
rslllli
•a
c
ra
Q.
G.
'B
..
IB
a o>
G§
1
o
f
'I
"S^
a 2
is
23
§l
5* O
o >
383
-------
if
is
rn" Q
N
-------
-a a
:-S
1 11
c^ E
'5
S 2
1"
WV hH
11 &
= I
IB a
if S
o
CO
z a
So o 2
8 H g e
£>i S3,
C -S
.li
.&
•SlJfJl
fulfill:
"S i -a .s § w .s s .5
Vi C S »t flj B "O • n ^3
^ssag«sa=
s
g
< W CU
si I
CO — CO
1
^o
Ui 4-1
y 5
2 0 S S
fi en ^
VI v^
3 -a
-------
o
o.
E
C/5
§
.a
*5
a E
c v
e ~
8.TB
II
1
i
o c?
o fl
11
o o
s
c "O
I g
Excavation and offsite disp
sewer line to privately-own
o
•2
S
ra
jc
13
C
ra
to
3
•o
00
_c
'c
ra
_jj
"o
Q.
3
60
C
'Si
t*3
1
§
C
60
2
'3
.0
1
.5
"5.
1
"S
•a
•a
c
ra
disposal of any contaminat
£?
I
u
•S
|
to
Q.
03
I
g
§
ra
Two-stage GW pumping an
2-g.gg
°l^E
*w "- OJ .>
e-5 §5
•IS §£
™ 5 n K
1^2
a S. o a,
mi
3 (8 ra T)
mentation of site access an
restrictions
<4_i
1
O
o
•8
BO -a
l-^l
£ i ^ S
•il-M
* S" 8
'5J S
-a P,
u
s e
11
xi o
re 2?T3 Ti
c .£ e c
E'~ TD W ""
_ 3 _J£ „
2 "o w ra E
c S V v =
8 •;£ E i
> g WTS S
^ LJ LJ c _e
O > P S u
S
Si"
Cl
I
1 i 3
o
o
o
o"
-
>o n
CO BO
S
e
TD
_ I
S
(A
Is
S
3
S S
tf
z S
386
-------
- a
a
u
~
-
'
« "S
<•> 3
s
.«? §
il|l
fill
. —
rx a
SI
8 g
°- e
a =
••§•§
s S
g>fc
.S > oo
&8.g
3=5.2
:« « e
Bfrl
Si ur-
.-= c «
SB 3 u
S ^ •£ 2
S '5
y -a
a 2
=3 §5
on S >
•
c
si
I
i «
•S $
•> g
> ra w
_ -o E?p8
1 S o ^
* to -n
T3.S C »
c E « -S
" Ifl^
> o O ^3
o 8 5 .S
§
J
387
-------
8.]}
8
Uj>
e
E E
wZ-3
'?•§
-II
> .1 8 E
= g'in 2
.sS-g S
S-l
o 5
1
I
1'e
M M
g§
B U -
•s e 5J
> c — .s a
nT . u M s; .5
e a •?..« 8 w
glliltl
si Jl
SI ll
1
"8
e
1
o
Sf 81
1^ .'". *V\ iWJ*
•c
ri S
ra
"2
a
Jf
11
g
•a
ll
d S S
388
-------
O C «
5 ™ u
sis
OJ
3
I
I
"a
a.
to
I
tx C?
m S
00 .t-
<» ^5
j; O — .2
« -o
V B
10 . IB
! "g .3 B
313 =
O -R 00
R 3 2
v> £> <*
I
A
£
$
«
E ^ x
E °-S
9 a i
w g J
r* ** CM
1 |1
.<9 eg
C o j2
S O T3
Q ""
^
1
at
1 !
i O
1 «
Eb to
u
tu
1
M
•g
to
>
&
•S
i
c
o
•a
u
to
| c
rg
•a-s
0 0
Z £
qj
3
.1
0 1
O
60
5
to
•if
t- 60
jj e
•S "C
S §
li
_
s
II
ed
s
u
_2
3
2
60
GW
•s
F
1
.5
Its
Ifr
" to
•slf to
o
tx
tC
o
S w
nj I*
(S O
g
•g .
<8 _,
&0
C
is «
S S
Ov
O
-a c
•a'I
f> C O w
£|'g«3
O S to cC
i-e
S ID
eu j:
B! U
1
389
-------
•f-g a
sll
us
C.
3
C
ra
a
Components of
Selected Remedy
> u
e
' 3
H *O
>
> a
< ts
' 5
?
CJ
2
a
PH
1>
1
£2 O
dj1 "aj" ^ ' u
c P-I Q -tf
2 C 3 !S
Si * a "B
rS ~ &> S
w«s
1
0 c
?! 53 2"
So
"c3
o >
" O
s "8 1
|3j 0
& £,"3 T3
O « 3 Oj
Hj r^ 4J "O Uj
0 Q " '? '"
£3 o=5 g,
^s S^r
ge'^S
Is S I a
iilfis
- i'3 S ^
'5 .52 g* jj o
t/l 13 C J5 00
•§
rt
Excavation and offsite disposal of contamin
soil; and GW monitoring
<*i
•o
O --5
§ 8
r-i ^
^
'I
"Sj£
3 S
s
j-j 2
S™
19
S
*p u
— E IX
_y 0 -^ g
3 ^ 5 ^
3 S 3 CO
as 1 1
in
o Is- I
^, O '
Sll 11 B 11
SI III gl
J3 .S -
2 o *^ "^ 3 w
a * «^ o'|2o
*-1~!ii^iS'so
C"t«o C '? — • *O ^J *^
III
Urt.S&E'S.Snsu
& j:
3 -e 60
0 S c
Excavation of soil and onsite thermal
destruction with disposal of ash as either
backfill or placement in an offsite RCRA fa
(if ash is EP toxic, teachable lead removal
treatment will be required); GW pump and
treatment using chemical coagulation, air
stripping, and activated carbon adsorption '
discharge in appropriate manner; and fenci
<•)
•a
>.
o
o
o
o"
in
CA
tfy
c > c1
8 J= -3 -a
J. •- 3. c
> ^ "o ra
*^3 "™ «2 u
inn
Sl 111
i
.&
ic
vs
~S 5 tv "5
C 0 CO C
E H ^- E
i a; co *
Sill
in
to
i g1
^ fc •«<^ • ^ -5
^ S CJ "^ ^tf3 "u CO
& 8 > .S S .E i
S
.-
I
s
_ g
SI
i il
390
-------
>
c •« a
o C ^
1 as
*^ « *«• '
e .5 S
Its
Cleanup Goals
Components of
Selected Remedy
OJ
I
•3
g
S
w
•2
&
1
2
S
OH
>
fS
\ c
.si
|" |S|
C 5T ^*
Sf §3
•alii
1/3 E. II
w (2
c
o
'S?
(2
*—
m ^ *
S"3 o
o 'S, *
Mg E
c o e — 3
8tf!-i!
8 i 1 i •§
£
ex
E
3
0 in
N CO
1 £
3 i 2
L/>
r— %
1
°- S f 1
Is- £§
\O u •"•" S
TJ
Trivalent chromium does not
exceed the MCL (50.0 ug/1) an
lead was not reported above
detection units
Installation of a low permeability, compacted
earth material cap over approximately 7 acres
of soil
•8
c
1
W5
O
•z.
^
'I
S
M
c
1
2
c
8-9
11
5
c£
3
Q rv 1
N 00 ;-
1 ^ *
JS ^. "V
& S ^
m
S
3
§^ °
.2 8.1
!'§• §«
Si £.2
Water discharge will conform
with POTW standards
GW extraction and treatment with discharge to
POTW
o
o
o
o"
*o
r-T M
O "rt
<-« 60
O «
o ~s
c> v
8«|
1*1
•a S if
c w .y
™ c c
1,11
z
h- S
0 fc
C CO
irT I^N O 4-J
\o •—• ». f-
S> 3 ° § /-s
LO ••• O 55 he^
o- a. c^ Ju S
si ££g
^
•S "Re
™ V w c a box
e fc 2 '5 g S .S S
'Be1" -aSi^e
"«2 S-S-ni
ny" MO— y.=
- vf M _- > =3 .5 i
•go -a a - eoKiS-0
3 g 1 W = 8 3 -a
•SSrgglBo-^llg
JfitS-S §$£*!>* *
03_;~ g°O 3'CJ2 C -
liilslslllli
Implementation of a full scale soil vapor
extraction system; installation of a multimedia
cap; excavation of contaminated sediment and
consolidation of sediment beneath cap; GW
pump and treatment; and institutional controls
to include deed restrictions, and site access
restrictions with compliance point at the edge
of the cap
*•>
"R
o
8
m
£
U w-
•s-sg
ro '£
, * 60
g 1 =i 8
E 2 -n 'S
•— • e^ u >n
•p -3 c 80
$ E '" s
iW
c« y > M
oc
tc
"p
4J
S » 1
i § 4,
&* ^ 8
in
§
j-
«« >& S
bO&
Remediation is aimed at
controlling migration, not
restoring the aquifer to drinkin
water standards, thus no cleani
levels were established
GW extraction; provision of an alternate water
supply to private well users; GW monitoring;
and implementation of well use restrictions
"8
IS
•••
i
u
M
O
Z
•S T3 T3
•c r e g
f w eo n
"8 ^ S" bo B"
M » § s .a
Hill
3-S-a s 3 a
c e c •— .3
| - « js -a '§
^. o cif 2 S p
O > ^ E n -g
•z
v "5
O V
1 -a §
^ ^ xl
J= OJ .? 0
1 1! I 2
in
391
-------
u
o.
u
o o
88
•a
c
OJ
60
aj
'
vO
00
m
I
t, ^e
S5*1 P
»-> o .5
in s o-q
E 3
1 S ^
K ra c
ego
"as
a.
2
•s °o
•r ^°
e
c? S
ro i
eg"
392
-------
£.€
tx D.
I
.a s..s S,
3*iB-§
O O O 3
if
55
u- •
3 .5
fjfgflfl"'
2 " •§ U £ i
o S
1 I
"?fl
|l?
|l>
•S S o
•95°
18"
ra ^ o
us
Sfl1 (LJ
•- ^ P
«I4J
*
c" oo
•2 .E
£j C
If
if
> s
g I
•El
3 §
u Q.
|i
i *
111
ill
sl-S
G 2 .5
•o
13
393
-------
V
1
W
§
13
1
DM
|
Uu
1
c-s a
!.!5
W Q M
P-
Cleanup Goals
jmponents of
ected Remedy
E
3
1
a
V3
5
5
2
S
PH
^
S
^
s§
l|S|
Sf§3
«> H «
a s « ^
K « .1 §
c/3 o-
B
0
'60
til
o:
1
f
8 g
^^ CL o
(A ^ 0
tg y •— »
lip
J2 "co -a
u §>S
-a
W extraction wells in the
lumes; treatment of extracte
tower aeration; discharge of
.2 1 S.
"8
S
Wi
fej
o
•z.
£
'I w
"§ ^
.S •—
B ;3
S "u
c •- u
Is^
O > s
5
5
•B
S
(U
'« 2
5 S
m
s|
o 8-
g 0
C^06
o w
'> G
0 «j \
•^ S.^ g1
t^l CO
8.sfa
S3 S CO DJ
•c v o n
5 X ! 60^
&"&-a
03 W 03 (0
Isl^
-a < -a 3
1
_c
o c
1
M
1 » 1
'u co ^
'2 js
3 ^j u
S^ w
0 rH
^1
S"l S"| 0
m &• & v ^
£& 5 £? S
= w S S
'S u _ g « '3
!hl ,?> .S
^ CO tfl
_ J2 "3 _, T3
^i"
lllll
Illll
s a "S *J
5 e-S^s g
flili
^. c « S —
S o K c 13
8 •£ u c ^
pi S = £ 60
co oo 8 'E.-E
^ -S " HI
0 § o'~-i
C 3 <^ i- £ 60
O " u To •- c
llni'i
811 til
£ b TS •« o E
'o .s „
« M £ :2
S ' o ° o '1 S "S
COOO<2T3 °-vk.
.5°°. "aJco2°^2
S"S255 fcei'S.*
J3
'? ifS
I'll 0.
_c £? i! S
c O s* .,
a T3 O 60
g CO _ 3
8 »s "?
M *^J cij
> O c E
O > .2 =
"~* ms "~
.2 -S .2 ix T3
a s o » .s
c; c a > ^
^ PJ ? ^ l-H I—I
U^
S
° ^
o O
0 O o —
It |i
•8
IS
1
CA
O
cl
achate collection drains;
ichate disposal at sewage
or at an offsite hazardous
facility; regrading with clea
^vegetation of bare and erod
Installation of le
provision for lea
treatment plant
waste treatment
soil cover and n
1
I
[A
O
"Z,
•o
lls:
"c *s *s 8
en 2i cd PH
^- E £? 60
to 's -s
£f $|!
0 8 > .E E
TI
c
•a s£ m
C CO
8 "w o
™ 2 S
5 Cj O
in
60
B
I
•o
B
CO
CO
w
'-'
394
-------
^ „
g"g 8
5 § c
?*" CM U
c .3 s
U S- Qi
cx
y;
C
c
S
u
i
*
>>
v, X
o'S
a E
ss
Hi
il
u$
CU
3
1
s
J?
5
Threat/Problem
£g
P 1(31
E S; <
J? F& «
F-* x^ 3 .M
s g i"S
'^o r« Ex E
vj .2. u
to as
c
_o
*5b
OJ
OS
*o ^
o °8
°. 0 °
^ r- O -T-
m g o 10 a
JJ s ^ S" 1
(N (- o tx g
S-S5 SS
-rl >• C u . QJ
x ^ ra QJ --. -a c
8 o „ « M.y ^= ,, c .E
5 i!§I| IJI"^^
§E|gS.ga -SlS-S^llt,
.aSS^S-Sff'SlS'g.JilgfS
l^fiSlll-^JSS'elgflA
12 Sa „ l|-§Sjfa §| i " 6 -a
fflll-B^^I-cSi'i'eS^^ia
«§BjS"? --So£^aj°]c-i!s
ioto< oo i- u!2_ c'SS ra:5 e-a
•a^^-J^llSll SI.
all^5-5S^if^sU?j?j
l^glyil^llplllsl
Sa.ocrSnSeB.n.Si.aouSbpB
1 c o «>
I -a s |
,b •-' i- ^ o2i *2
n 2 J! qj O 'S
•2 « C S-T3 § § %
c^30ajEE>--3
o **j ~o 3 Sj -^H ^ >^
.- _ ..c cS^ -S
^ C ^J ffl '"" >. L- C "-^
^oC^c"™0^3
t/3 *S rt C S '3
^r S K .2 8 g* 9f 3 o
>• 3 oj -3 •— ^ c- "C
^••riu TO 'ff ^ c a\ &
Uga=Eg^|g
u-ucna? . g =
0 «fe S g,^ g"5, o
»Sm---"1c5p
Ill^SsIl
Iflijlfl!
S^^'oSocgg
Sillill 1
oPRS^w^'u^
3£iJ3^iES.S
•o
c
c
I
o
•z
.a u
•RS U
u -s | a § s
»•? bo| ff B
Jill!!
K E — T3 w g
- 3 fl 5 "ra -
i> c n ^ ^J "O
a S > "6 e S
•« ^ E
•g I 1
^ S ^^3
-Sri fi-a-o| os 1
S - u .& fc c » E
§1 ^"11 § 4
m (0 i -3 t- W X. ™
5o Sl8rt 8 <^
lO
*— \
58
o o °
0 e o -3 C1
0 g 0 0 « "
o § •§ m" e fe
to 2 n ° C S
^ai ss^
ji
ai .2 j?
c -a w
S 5 3
— e
MO?
1 C J2
•a c "§
•a a; S
re g _
V ^S
1 §1
S s E
OS E w
60
C
'S
a,
"fi
US
•f S
ra Jj
.s-g
g «
^^ >T
S S
QJ t/J
|s
(C
SdJ
B>
•g-s
s.y
bo-o
c
•a. § g>
E a -c
i.§ 2
S|1
0 5 E
1
'1
W5
Q
S
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
S
5 „
> £ 2 oo
g OJ CO
S •£ E ^?
3 CX — o)
ra & 13 S
55 5 S ^2
in
is
"
usi
ys
bon
atm
fi
"8
is
1
c > c
Sis
c « ;•=
w C 2
111
u — Ov
s D. Xi
S S \
3 3 o;
S to o
395
-------
1"SS
1 M5
£ s s
c
Si o
l&a'l
« C u -
2 > a-2
S 3 «"S
•* s .§ s
c/i en
c
c
'5
u
K
S- 11
s^i
£
<**
j?
^
E "
>.
o .ca
•8?
° J3
— .S3 >,
3s.£
so 3 "3
Q, Sfl OH
3 " _
g CO ^
QJ g C/3
"" tt <
oj CQ u
£££
..
bo5
<4- e H
o -a o
eo3 ft.
Ifi a
Hydraulic flushing and vacuum pum
sewer lines followed by filtering the
water and sediment and discharging
"8
e
I
o
2
.a
, s
C ™
§§>
^ -S (Jg
E '5 y
lag
bll
III
w
c
cu
1
offsite incineration and disposal of s
S
2,
o
t»
1-1
o
bo
_^
"bo
O
LO
a
CO
ui
<^-
2
T3
OJ
w
1
•o
C
CO
£
CO
_cu
14-1
X
1
.2
•O
.a
02
"8
S
S
c
_o
~Vi
'I
"S
CO
•u
c
CO
jf
1
o
l/>
BQ
Si
1
2
"a
structur
inspection of the pipeline to ensure
integrity
C
QJ
S
Z.
o.
5
01
2
CO
.CJ
"3.
o.
CO
s
1
1
bo
C
1
.2
c
_o
1
1
o
o
2
cu
c
o
^^
=
o
o
c
-§
contaminant levels in the site's well;
C "O N
SS o;
S b o
8 E
The municipal water treatment
system will remove VOCs and v
ensure that contaminants of
concern do not exceed a 10'5
lifetime excess cancer risk and
SDWA MCLs. GW will be treat
IT >*
E "°
CO c
—i CO
E "S.-O
a 2 § bo
•S«c
.fill
S.S.8 §
&.S c E
S §•§£
Si E 2 G
13 60 K -a
e c ra c
«'«•««
bo'x o
C CU -5 C
'1*11
3 60™ >
lit!
US g
U E.E g
"8
c
III ..g
jj s i ~ ^ S|
'^ 1 1 c ^ -2
CO g,» g^ g
•8 * § S H --
1d«ES>
SI § g^q
> „ _ « 3 «
5 s 8 S <°. y »6
w i.2 co0^ | 3
fl all Sa
fa CO CO C P i i-i
"S Ms-§^
S.Ew.E °
11 a -i •§
O >
1
Q
w g g1
.
e
E
W5 >
t-i >
396
-------
a -a 3 « y _
-a <« 6 " 7513
1.11.1!
o ^ 5 =3 5-
og t-, s
S'l- Rg
a^i K.S
- —
tv 2
_r 3
I
c
bo —
C" CO -U g
I|.N
f Ijs
I s g •§ K
- e °'§
filii
o " .-a 6 ^3
I 8 111
•8
8 „- g. £ * 'c1
S^=5 SS'g
T3
S
8.
o
o
CO
Ov
SI
siir^f
11 = -1»I
=5 S '» «• 3 °
^IPf.
•Refill.
11
•a
c
ro
oo e
_ c «
8 =3 £?
3 = o
S§ £III
"S -S »
18 . '5 .S
j-> s -a
E .x tS .S
111 .s
w c a c
lllf
5 |
fe a
11 1
S x
™P,
^ S,
"S "*
So
5*
II
CO
i
3
,§
I »
a § s
8
1
I
I
397
-------
X
1
£
1
• >
U _,
•ol
E co
CO ^C
11
3
1
X
c^
1
S
vO
J— C* 3 U
2^-° c
tn Bi o
E «
C
., w
1 8
3 E
'3 CO
« 00
S.8
*O CO
00 E
^ 'fe
\ *-
»— 1 t/5
t— 1 I— 1
a
i
o
t_l
o
E
I
T3
E
60
£
S
I
«
3
JO
1
'E
TJ
e
CO
£
£
CO
I
S
a
CO
"8
t>0
1
R
tn
•S
TJ
B
1
c«
CA
•o
S
of gravel access r
|
S
8
\ .
si
II
I
Ul
I
§.€
Si
• -3 I ti -5 &> i
s s?B5 EJS5 E i
I
§* i E
C M
E T3 Jj
N M ~O
O g '3
tx 3 -
•Js 2 •"•"
^^
'is *
a| s
.2 g, $
« io 5
lo
B
b
ta
T— (
00
E
'S
•a
A
Q
•c
CO
"u
b
CO
'£
W
3
1
00
00
\
m
S
o
CO
B
E
M
1 I .1
•3 i> e-
8
398
-------
§1
iff
$3
O ^
co —-
co ™
O
§•1
Jd O Z'
I
* S!
•S_
•" 'S P
Si * b
c S
ag"!-8^
S f I £ * «
^1 = ^'
J*|iIPr
§
si
O »
" —
"O n
x eo
o
o
O
(S O
CN IT)
O
O
O
8"
O
O
O
of
11
I'll
. 5 «
& 8 g?
t/3 ui O
£?
O
-a ,
.
1 II
• T3
"
« « ' 3 &
1
;§ §
a s S s
_ ro 60 u
51 s-s
O E . «
--gas
^ li i
'S
> CO
a i 2
«r- ss §
as ^ E
E 1 c;
alls
0
09/29/87
re _^ —-
.5 T
Q £
399
-------
o -c
i
-2 ee
IP
w a
rf 1
w 8
O «
— CO
.15 £.
D.
j a 53 ^a *.•"
51I*1.!
ill pi
.a oi — 53
s a
'B B . - -a 5
2 |s E ?
in
"L 8*
* -a /
•*.
CO
•<)•
"w OJ °.
_-£ g
c3
•s |
i'l
§1
i
U E
oT
to
a
t/5
^ §
1*1
State/Tj
Signature
Remedial
T^"
1
E* —
1
S
S
1
t-
Industrial
03/24/88
1
E
a
•fi
t
O
«
c
S
I'
400
-------
S
o
D.
I
•a
&
s.f
-
.1 §
o
ltl
1 III
S
1 1 .1
T3
O
T3 ^ C
1||
1| °-.
o 8 >
VJ
'I
•8
i
i
IB
4) B
if
sf
C i-3
B CJ
60
_C
e
o
action wit
o
l
ii.
i > i
1*1
8'S-s
«i CO "
•o?
S
ighland
-
s.a
*
1
I
ii .i^i*!
^2 KP
fe
^
1
Final
401
-------
T3
C
3
'S -5 'S
05
00
g-s i
•S 11SS-8
ra & o ^ e >
^lUJNt °
si-ai<8'sU
SlMiHlif
£ 11 °. I s -a". *.
Pi-B.a-wSSPJS
a ^-e
o o a
3 8§3
U.
Soil, sediment, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
,
X
including arsenic, and
organics including PAHs
12
00
00
402
-------
Components of
Selected Rey
8" .3
o w
o —
in 2
«2 c
w
1 1*11*2
11
a v
_. .
•£ «
•S .
a f. i 15 '5
.-33.S±3-§i
•§§&Il!'S
g-g S 2.S gb
u § < u bO.O«
•= TJ (U -5 C U
*1!!!II
- .
i
o
in
tv
"S-S
Mi
I.aa
u e of
==> a|
« o o S
•S •£>
3 00
>? ^
.•3 \ „
M ^^ ^
8 g
0
§ § -E i
? §§£ s
a o" o" o s
5 -a
00 C
•13
E ra^
i .1 1 S J
u C _
[2-2 S
u 2 'E —
CO) 0) t?
UH O
403
-------
e-a a
S § q
> _ 0
S 3 "s
!#s
J9
a.
3
c
8
u
%
*- £•
°*8
S3 E
ss
P
IS
! 3 3
\
i
i
)
|
i
? «
' i
4 "r"
, P
3 >
J V
•< v.
J a
5
E
I
\
K
|
S? C
i&s'l
(M 5T ^
Sf |3
slfl
K S .§> g
tt S
c
c
'5
t
A
g
2" |S
:? ?
= ^ "ra m — - •«
'5U^ 5^"o6 S^1
Iliili !
— b S oo ^cs-o
lsl||l|H«
|p:|r^»i
5 EcxSS^,,, >;3
^ 3 ^ 1 o ^ g i =3 2 ^
Ic^'g^Mfl^l
".E-^ NJ2_ «:- S
rs§^lgg^'g|gi
c/5M'n.Sj5So3w<3S:
= & 3
•g 1 -^ 85
4 ^s^ |&u
Is §- s g^
S ° -S -2 'g 1 B
E S g g -a c E
-'£ &c fflT3£
'S 0 « .2 -5i ^ ^3
™ .. u c ° «
*S 13> u « ° = M
° c: § 'c1 c .2 g
I 11^ 2 § §*
•5 4_. *6 "i3 .S ^ <^^
iirlMi
l|2|lii
60^3 C [7 .2 K to
o QJ o "a o -o
"3 "8 S -3 s;^ '3
•s S S « C" C o1
•° « S .- <3 « =
.§ I b | 8 i- s
w) w T3 -g o o ^ O
8^ §•
S^ S-i
rq-S in &
5
S ^
^•s a g
18 '> n S -5.
"^0 | ^
|l>|-s
•§ S H » w
*^ ••• to c i.r
a; c ro .s: QJ
"1^'S |
? §?1l
t/a b 0- .S 2
nj DO
•n C
1 't
"a v
as i. i i
r- 4-r -n ^ cb' fe
•S oj X ™ Sa .
IS I'S S a
Z ft, O t-i
vO
O _.
MO C
£•8 "
r^ p,
§S ;
W
1
a
ro
s s
bo
U e
io .2
1 '^
2l
J3 O
tJ u
*•§
a «
S X
ill
&s S,
BUM
&l §
•a 5 -a
•3 -a 5
a§'s
« x .2
2 (U T3
"8
ta
M
O
2
•S
'?
"§ 60
I.E
.S "a
E-r
2 S E
C •- 3
JH
181
E
•2
I
6
is
vO
2 ^
e S
• s «.
1 S
CO
al
c
§ 2
Ja -3-3
-------
" S «=
sll
§3o
a.
£
o.
3
§
0
cision Summary Table
Components of
:lected Remedy
Q *
*
1
ai
g
E i
g !
fc I
e
s
I
>
1
4? §
lJS'1
Seg-S
D a s TS
.5 B S a
M a.ig
wj A
c
o
•&
00 S o
3 si t
sal
B
-SP
1-8
u 2
s ° "
e X-S
.£ 66 S
.1 E
'S W "S
~* . m
!°t
|l|
E-" u 2
S 5?
treatment using electrochem:
sinjection; and site monitoril
TJ =
c .c
i a
a?
E M
3 TJ
a.C
S U
5 e
"8
e
1
1
£
'g
"§ 60
ra c
.S =3
£2
1 = 1
8 -le
> s g
5 ti b
5 e-g
E
_a
c ^
6 .g
1^ 1
Sa 1
^D
ctf
^* "c3 o ""*
K -g. 8- i
tfS sS
1
M— I
I
W5
S
c
•n .2
gO. T3
Is « a
'§ T, -g I-B
2 g * 3^
C bo O.
8 c.s>-s
CJ « > C
^ | o o S
I -S y - S
S 2 .-H"u v
S8|II
« a S ~z b
S -| S § T,
= ° e "Sc
co .« en «
CJ V *^ -1 -T-l
t. BO C 3 ^
" -a o P S
•a 3 o fe ra
c T/I x G cr ..
^2 _ •& 3 c g,
al «£>£ «
.ti ™ ""• c & _e
g -- « •— 03 u
O w O Sa fa -3
"8
tc
1
(A
^J
O
r°f -
0 B
, P s
c > E
O j-
U "S TD
= 5 S
•S3 tf
c w 3
a e o
•^ *s '^
> P M
0 1 S,
„ 5
I 1 g £ 1
£ , c 5j b
" -a ^ CJ •
« n 2 ov «
0 (N O 0 £
•0
o B
tfll
w £r s
jj .§
* "O c > 2
CL, D S « £
III°!I
^i^^ sJ!
e ••• *H "t3 c ^3
H *J *^ ™ *C*
- « 'S g s I
A « u £ -3 5
111 1
— s o _ s M
o 8 8 o S fi
t/j Qj co t/5 .5 H
_.
IB « g>
on of contaminated surface
id drainageway sediment wii
if residual ash; placement of
ish and revegetation; and
collection and treatment usii
in
g S ° ra > .2
5 "" ^ > X
8 g, S Ji o r
•S -o | & -n S
U5 L4 C *O
.C "w s
O Ox J? O
vO
^ "8 v!
p * w
c g c
CS *- t»
: u ™^
o g w
sil
HI
Jill
J2
a
&
00 C
OS c
in u r
't ii «
"a
c
b
(A
405
-------
.a
8
I
r>
tj -o a
113
ill
W3
0
O
c.
3
C
CO
ai
_£
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
P
c
3
"3
QJ
VI
OJ
OJ
1
PH
•co
£
E-
fcl
llo |
£€3 & S vj -S
1
•SlSt
2 Eo
m -a '"'
™ e co
2 « e
T3 SP °
l^-g_
« " g?.*
JJ _ -* w
s I VE
*|Bg
S3 tJ g d
Q CO O ca
W U 1-1 U
Consolidation of offsite contaminated soil with
onsite wastes and surface soil followed by in-
situ stabilization and installation of a concrete
cap over the fenced portion of the site and a
RCRA-clay cap placed in the south field;
decontamination of warehouse with resultant
solid wastes combined with soil remediation
and wastes treated and discharged into sewer
system; offsite disposal of drums and equipment
not adequately cleaned; offsite disposal of water
not meeting discharge requirements; and
cleaning and sealing sumps
•a 'u
>• 00
*>.!
23
1 -
«J S
•a js 3i
•gig1
"•s'-5
u" S S
00 CO U
•ace
3 •— —
"»> m —
co ^5
111
S
_- £•
.§ i
C CO
r fe
CJ —
-c *a °° 2
U .g » .5
S3 i ^ ^
1 2 ^ S
0=1
« ^
co O
t^- 'I~^ —M
rfl s 1
N- §• ^- i
Si S-S
!
2 -a
2 2
-o b oo
01 o ^/
(0 OO'Si
8^^
£E9
u q 5
J3 O rH
X
S ° ¥>
= ^H jg
? M =3
_ JC CO
'3 < "3
C/5 dn 5
Excavation and temporary storage of soil in an
onsite RCRA facility; construction of a road
over excavated areas and existing roadway to
provide access to site area; and temporary
relocation of residents during excavation
**1
•g.
o
o
o
•*"
£
*>
*.8
5 c
III
•= o <
6-X3 P-
2 e oo
c to c
8^
Igl
"TO
U
s£
1 H t^
6 | g
2 a §
s s, ^
a, t/a o
o 3
« n
o u
K? ||
*-'§• S- g
Si S5.
^
o.
3
s
"o
u
.1
« "« ^
g>.a o
'^ll 1
TD g g IN
S 115 1
8.3
CO CL
oC S
o
c
S 2
.8 ^ 2
!•« e 151
.a s £ a
C JS > ^- V rt *^
00 "• U
c E «
O "" u
- -a .2
-C C W5
™ ^ T-l
C C
O 'C a
!•§ s
CO c *.;
Sl8
I
E
•gl
§ 2
CO ^
.5 B w
Sa§^11
g
•g.
1/1
I
CO
'C
406
-------
u
a-8*
£«!
W O "« <9
'§'
'S ^ J2 2 O -a s
85 5 Ta o c; c E
^•^ co *—' co O to cj
°o P3
' C U
1 (0 ft,
1 M"§1
« -a « -S
lI|g.S
-Ills
•5 E -u 2 go
w S .E S o
"8
1C
1
o
-C
s
„ § js .a
5? to c
CJ y] 5 ^ .E
•o
B
M
IS
'
I.I
25 II
o
Ul
8 >
407
-------
sla!
a O
J2 g
•3 g
•§ a
s «
§1
•a >%
II
2
b
^
s
V
•5
I
° §1 °
.h 'S S -a
CB .S2 _ e
.t i 2 c
«£ ^3
c u S g1
LS.
!I
cd-S 2
lU5
a a C. «
|-3
a. S g -g .e
g^bS
ii,
sf a
o >
X 'B
P—" fe="" *v="" us="" f*="" j="" 3="" n="" 2^1^="" 1="" o="" ii="" •a="" 13="" «y="" o"i="" »="" g="" j2="T3" .s="" to="" -a="" "="" '.§*="" ^="^" «="" •§="" ra="" c="" 's="" i's="" 408="" <="" pre="">
-------
•8
tc
I
o
if
II,
B e S
?> S
S
H «-"
xg a
jjj 55 «
"co « >
> E "«
1M
^ S
g
•a
i-is
Si.1
t- £ C
(Q ™
1 I
I
U W
*S 3J
1 E
= v
I
i
1
S-S « i
o
'S
CO C
,1 'e -O
va E c
•o 3 S
ecu
1 8 8.
X g X « u t?
f §?P -3s
w a S-6 e
" 2 2 a 'i K
'S i. £ Jj -3 fe
K S S ?
1
o
IS
1B
Sill
CO
CO
£
01
1
I
S
1
o R*
2 <8
S
'E '•
t>0
|1
J? °
^§
z a
409
-------
J2
•a
|
o
o
fr
1
£ S
§ •§ o*
CO £ O
'a
'5.
"8
1C
I
c
5P
M
c1
12 ^
if
H2 "3.
£-0
S S
"S
cs
I
g§:
X
o
t-l ^
S js
1-1 H
Snj
. .S
i ^
i «
So g
°. S ^.
1
o
c
1
CO
8
u
S
00
c
o "
& 2
r"7 =
8
o
I
o S
410
5 ^ .E
•o
B
M
IS
'
I.I
25 II
o
Ul
8 >
407
-------
sla!
a O
J2 g
•3 g
•§ a
s «
§1
•a >%
II
2
b
^
s
V
•5
I
° §1 °
.h 'S S -a
CB .S2 _ e
.t i 2 c
«£ ^3
c u S g1
LS.
!I
cd-S 2
lU5
a a C. «
|-3
a. S g -g .e
g^bS
ii,
sf a
o >
X 'B
P—" fe="" *v="" us="" f*="" j="" 3="" n="" 2^1^="" 1="" o="" ii="" •a="" 13="" «y="" o"i="" »="" g="" j2="T3" .s="" to="" -a="" "="" '.§*="" ^="^" «="" •§="" ra="" c="" 's="" i's="" 408="" <="" pre="">
5 ^ .E
•o
B
M
IS
'
I.I
25 II
o
Ul
8 >
407
-------
sla!
a O
J2 g
•3 g
•§ a
s «
§1
•a >%
II
2
b
^
s
V
•5
I
° §1 °
.h 'S S -a
CB .S2 _ e
.t i 2 c
«£ ^3
c u S g1
LS.
!I
cd-S 2
lU5
a a C. «
|-3
a. S g -g .e
g^bS
ii,
sf a
o >
X 'B
P—" fe="" *v="" us="" f*="" j="" 3="" n="" 2^1^="" 1="" o="" ii="" •a="" 13="" «y="" o"i="" »="" g="" j2="T3" .s="" to="" -a="" "="" '.§*="" ^="^" «="" •§="" ra="" c="" 's="" i's="" 408="" <="" pre="">-------
iii
> — 0
*-* S *5
S "S, §
CU
Cleanup Goals
•*
^^
Components of
Selected Remedj
V
E
1
CL
V,
•2
5
9.
&
8
ex
n
n
£
£
\ E
^ s.s
flT Tj fO *•
e e-Q %
co C" cu _
2 fe; s«
a § «1
'& « .1 1
C/3 (2
B
O
•E
<
cS
f
U JA
8 oil
° °- ? Si.
§£ o S ^
go £ S <-.
,- 8 n J<- 8 S S
*N C S ^ v- *X CO
Sl&i 5£>oA
O v^
O O fe e
£•» is*-!
1.3 .2 -3 I M g; |
^"SSluSS-s^
f'-^^-lgae,;
ll§§8s-§Ms
_«-a-=i>'2E,E£g
gSssfi.g'.fSsl
v'ScjS.E's0iijj£°,3.
| § £?£? g 3 ™-S f2^
.sis32 Is li s
miiij^i
all^sl^ll
c/T ^-i
CU T3 E
60 0 Jj CO
"co S ° cj if — r
•o ff^'S S E
'B | i & g> a §
t».« e ° = -s jj
-S ^ tS -3 S <" "
= feg §.§.*«
•§ g'^s " ° 5
M •= .S ^ CU C |g
Illllf!
" _ S & M "• CO
g ^ 2 =i S -a 1
" w u -a 3 'G .S
iiasBsii
"ot-Ecuel--n
lilllsll
I^iSSssi
K 1 S 1 g ? S .ts
WCS.SuM^co
f)
"R
o
o ™
•* 9
OS ^
^
'1
•a »o
S B "0
« "" S
E 3 ra
1 ^"S"
1 8^
Si .-.1
•3&5.S
t/3 O (X T3
&b
E h oo
•a e c
o § •§
0 0 & _
Si ^ ffi ^,2
" K £ « E
1 ^1 S ^
IP §11 1 1
\o
Q tfl ._ 60
0 ¥E<
!^il!
u &*>. ^- .;- ~ 1/1
.p ^
8 -c
±•5 S
=5 S3
« T3 U
T3 S §
E a 8
co c 6<
5 '§ •§
0 2 §
5 S
g
-------
Record of Decision Summarv Table
8
&
%
^
O C £
1 "o
sis
|ag
J2
O
O<
S
C
«
5
Components of
Selected Remedy
CJ
E
3
1
flj
•C
WS
fO
£
o
T^
S
(x
"i>
£
£§
<"" 5? S ' o
S c <
s?il
IB |1
« W3 .60 §
W3 OS
C
0
'Eo
S
s
K^ Og
H 11
£ & Kg
^2 o °9 ra
In-situ neutralization of the acid sludge wasl
followed by construction of a soil cover ovei
the waste area; institutional controls includil
deed restrictions; GW monitoring; and
completion of feasibility study addressing the
subsequent sediment and GW operable unit
l!
S 3
CO -,
~t;
eo -a
c '0
•8| «
•M 3 y
•ill
Lil
§ S-2
0 E? i
» ° »
•§.-§3
!/J S O.
.11
& "° §
n £ s
^ ,* «s
i a -Is- §
id i^E o?
CQ C 3 i T3 CS
ll !§J i
t-x
0 g
VI f
:
(B
S
No action remedy. EPA has determined that
lacks authority or jurisdiction to undertake
cleanup of onsite petroleum wastes that are
being released in significant concentrations
Z a
< Q
Ilfl!
,
•8
a
c
_o
1
o
o
o
i- >;
ij c
«>
•a 3
ra
'I
S S
412
-------
O
0.
9
B
II
ii ii 11 I
- 1
Elllll
I
o
Jf
"3.
§
«S
U
bo
C
'C
3
S
s
o
I -II
5
1171
K -g 1 -g
•a o-f S
•S a = 2
-•S * u
O j_,
-s
60
a 2
o
•S
•8
S
b»
5 a
o E
•o > B ,£ S
S § .2 j? .3
™ -s O \ e
« _. TfJ o bfc C
5 Tg £ * E 'S
!Sfl«s5
£BH3l
>> QJ ^ WS ^
1M1||
l^.ai-?t
•BJU
18 e c
•a w o js
IF
_.- e
3 u •-
3 .E ffi
^1
II
3 3
o .S 7 S -g =
I jfl SI ".1
Blllt-8
S3 £:, o aft P
||&iP§
5 12 s .£ 53 o
^ C n e u
aj&l^.i
° = _ v> _O
"8
o
.1
> I ^ I»
Slil-a
•c
60
B
'E
oC
O
413
-------
Cleanup Goal
Components of
Selected Remedy
'
-
c o
" —
d •-
>S &
— cj O
"5 '3 c
-a S sf
g S -s f
—, 'S ra 2
CO
\
<5
6
S
I!
£
Discharged GW will meet NPD
guidelines. GW treatment will
3
2;
u-
o
$ s
S.2
S3
Extraction and offsite dischargi
continue GW extraction and cc
•o
V
I
t/5
O
z
£
'g
•8
I.s
'i 1i
c c
8'"
f
meet MCLs and EPA Health
Advisories, and withdraw the
•a
3 i
cu *^
z >>
(^ "H.
0 §•
from well-3, with offsite dispos
provision of an alternate watei
1!
co
414
-------
o
I
111
-S O S"
I
1
o
I
isl
ra c c
=§ e &
5 2 S
O
I
8
1
I
o
•8
tc
I
E 'S
2 2
'
'o o a
t/5 > E
i
I
a
O „
"8
c
I
o
i I
rf 3
u ~ —
1
w
o
|
!
o
^ a «
g§- i
SI 2-g
=5 e 4! S
.
~ >5^ >
5 > g
U3 C« ^
o
ra O
Si
o
CO
s
Ov
§ ,2
415
-------
s
o
a.
3
c
IS
D
O
lS"S
t/5 > w
•
11
1
oo
I
_e V
•S ^a
'5 «'e
•o o
•y 'c g
£ o ^
(0*^*0
11 s
!§•§.
o e-S
u o
-------
•* I 8
sa 8 <=
'!is
S — g
•- o 8
» •a'b
•o a --1
§ g w
s g-s
<8 S'S
= T3 M
^fig^
10 ^ u to"
"§ 1 'S S - -r «
j: a a b s -S l
•ff *3 ?s J3 be W u
O O ^-* >3 £• V S
ft 8 > o S S..S
O
Ml
^C
z
OJ U
•3, JS
U 3 .
'
§ S
its
I «
£ i
1&&
CB C *•"
1^1
IK
8-al
SH
B
«.
o
u. C
C C \ t3
SO o? C
S ee o N
1
li
1
417
-------
U
O
83
E
s
~ o
t/5
I
-f §3.l2'
J2
§1
= ls
itf
w o -a
£ s
11
1.
1!
Is
o >
u
u .S
ll
w '-
•c
eg u
C/3 ^2 ^v
li II
g
I «
8 S
418
-------
R.S
o
"53
E
s
8 s
— *
t/5 'a
.
•S 2
">
, I.?
4;
-------
§ II
sal
H
sf
^^ sa a
tl-M-a
iifSsiJll^
J^I1I*1
1
£ a y
*-• f
O .-3
sl
o
O £"J
III
e ^ w _. •§ g g
$"S If 111 s"s
aj-^ 3t«T3"u *-••! O *u
'S " S . S3 -S - -^
= J= J1"^" J2
S a a -g|
ffl ^
o
E | = g •
"81.8 I •
ifi
M
fS
OJ
=
ON
o
1
b
to
420
-------
dj
H
Threat/Problem
> c
. ffl .2
4? r? U
SQ <
cH-T QJ — i
I il
<55 .S? 1
c/> S
B
O
'5o
S
g
rx
f^
cs":=
S.€
_r S
51
B
CO
s
JZ
s b
•S .>
4-1 ^
3 >
aj "P
s]
2 |
j; *-
CX e
O E
|l
f B
H .=
li
|-£
E TO
9
H a
Ja: 3
^ a
" S
CO u
w £
"2 s
Construction of surge po
Portal; construction of cc
1 a
ta
o g
CN -S
SW, sediment, and GW
contaminated with
j:
_o
3
O
California
CO
00
- S
«
u 1
I
ll
•si
« |
a u.
^^
w S
U-l
O t_i
H
•8 S
00 «
B V
'13 O
3 e
P o
DO '3
•o 2
tunnel recharge areas an
fractured rock; implemen
5
O
o
&.
oT
network to detect leakag
.E
S
_E
•a
B
CO
a.
E
a.
U_i
O
E
migration; and installatio
Ui
£5
QJ
bo
a
s
treatment should surface
metals including
cadmium, copper, lead,
and zinc
CJ
U3
3
00
B
'E
S
03/29/88
1
Z.
2
2
0
m
^r
S
5
£
1
^
B
S
*•
>
•p
it
i
E
1
c
V
c
'E
T3
'u
CO
1-
£
s
1
c
u
i
c
N
.1
S
"8
(C
I
W
^j
S
Possible contamination
u
CO
cy
•2
M
<
^
U
1
00
^-N
"1
O.
~s
3
O
il
S
,-2
£•
1
'3
S
u
•u
drainage discharge
of sediment, and
downstream SW and
8
j«r
_
L/)
V)
3.
s
CO
E?
o
_E
jB
1
U
09/30/87
S
2S
_
CO
3
B
B
-S
t
ta
H
13 w
c "o
J
'5.
c ro QJ
.2 •"
•"
QJ 03
^
t/5 O 2
o
2
cG
8-S
81
•a a
c ra
ra c
11
•
08 a
8
•5
•g
111
O-
r^
CO
i.
Ij5p ^ -s
U --- U O TC
421
-------
(
sljf
1||
C
(A
1
O
ex
c
u
«- A
°^S
12 e
§tu
a.
P
O
S$
V
S
3
1
u
1
E
u
3
s
s,
t5
§
s
£§
|S'|
€§3
0? d •£
3 IE
wi .S? S
C/3 K
C
,c
'5
S
c:
o «
S,
•S
'|
1
1
03
C
1
xcavation of conta;
w
rH
^t-
o
g
_o
1
B
CO
c
§
T3
Si
2
o
M
2
'i
0
OJ
00
2
0
CA
QJ
2
1
_e
x>f and placement
c
'55
d
o
•g
g
d.
S
60
C
laintenance of exis
fc
1
U.
,0
^
*o
JS
ca
S
c
3
£>
'u
^s
OJ
2
s
W
^
o
^j
•«(•
LO"
T— (
_QJ
3
JS
'S
isposal becomes av
•o
*ra
a
.—
^
cy
*w
ti
o
"ra
c
tc
8
•s 8
s^
•a.s " a
! |l|
slit
e
3 to
K
^
0?
n p o? -s
>— • O o in
B
S
ill
« A D<
T3
i S
6 0
.2 „ 0
S fe
fe o .2
S8-1 ^
4J ,-T o os •£
O v_^ J O VD
C «J
( .t
18 c "S
J-'l g a
c E o
M-i-i
^5 O -5 C
o
c/3
tu -5 tu
-a ? TD
> T3 ro
S S ^
Q O O
•a
V
Oj "O
C g,
1 "S
111
II
Q O OH
fe
1 •
O tV
422
-------
ti •« a
1^
sis
QJ D. J
I3
_«
c
C
C
CC
a
j
4
•l
o-S
£3 E
is
11
6V
y
V
1
"rt
£
&
cfl
5
s
p
s
e
OH
>
-C
p
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
o
'EC
JT
«
i
o i
0 O
^ c? —
N""I| O g
t> '5, 8 c
sl si
£1-
111
111
»*I
i — °-
til
V rr* ™
s; F P
T3 "M T3
* c 5
ra
c B c
ill
C N c
Big 8
•*~ CO lu
o a o
lg" 8
6 .0 *a
-S2 £3 ^
all
g" 8
0 ° a
c-Sl
s t- c
™ ^ o
r" O
o "° b
**3 ^Q rt
W C X
85 l«
S S a §
13
*** T7 '•"*
•?, « :§ a
-p ^o c
8s o ii§
°- S o ^ '3
tv OS
"8
IB
I
s
*
00
B
•a
2
1
CL
trt
8
4~l
C
8
1
CO
y;
1
«
1
> OJ
1) BO
2 CO
CO i«
E s
a =s
^ 1
1
^
I
CA
S
z
1"H
CO <8
, £? u-
c o &
8 •£ §
^1 |
O T-I so
?1 1=1
« S ^ a
_ •§ ^ £?
•g E 75 O
5 S .S .5
Libby Ground
Water, MT
09/26/86
1st
CO
423
-------
u
_g
£ll
8^
8
Si
8
o
CO
d-
E
- -
8
o
o
.S cs .S o
1
1
1
S 2
•a
-------
O
O.
I
. S 2 Ji
153 a.§§
1
s
I
ff
o
1
111,
W
>cd e E u .
SlsSits
oli|t§
l4*«
" — 2 8 S" "• --
<§ 11 g 11 k
• •a
"
61
ill-!
=5 8 I 3
liiiM
'ii
&
'E
!S f-
> =
£ tf
8'fi
•g 8.
•i 2
S (x
S
e
I
to
I
•a m
S M
2 -£
1 =
O E
s 's
J-S
JS E-
|
Q
O 3
ll-st
1
•a
1il"H
.s o n ra
•1
1
U)
I
I c 8
-n'i
3 73 g?
u 5
2
1§
II
425
-------
o
a.
3
u
-
§ "3 ^
s -g -
E S a -
«b §
s .S || fi -S «-
III
M_. - -0
-a oo
S .E
£ I g> 1
•S '5 « "2 "u
S 11 ™ -s
= T3 -S
5 g '5
S
1 8.
0 S
" s
v
S 60
5
o .-.
g
in /-<
vo" 2
'
S
1
•a
c
CO
I
2
s
X
w
.«
•5
a;
2
1
c
u
c
CO
s.
•o
c
CO
c
o
Excavati
<*i
TD
5,
8
o
o"
^-
c
8
'5
w
•o
C
CO
O
c"
S
c
3
@
u
IU
bo
bo
tr>
i- c c 5 r
CiJ CJ l_i rh -^
co S ¥ ° "3.
MNI
_ -2 gj 8 u
l|f |s
5**-Bl
•J^jf ».§
itlli
>%
1
(A
I_i
OJ
1
c'*
ill
s
^
8^2
Standards
GW pump and treatment Not specified
n with discharge to river;
u-1
I
>4«l
0
bo
C
M
9J
Rechanr
c
CO
£
u
cu
§
U
c
8
1
T3
C
CO
O
U
S
*u
£
1
c
_o
1
<^j
CO
e
5
-g
S
•S
'5
T3
>%
O
o"
o
t^
s.
c
CO
r construction
-------
.9
II
8-
S
°
« X
— 60
J»
Q.
C
O
14- >>
°"S
£3 £
c
W S t/5 O B! H .-i
>-¥ §
42 Q C
60 & _P3
•* =3 T3 V
** „, BO «
S-S S-g^ §
_- d w — * ™
l|l|ll
5 E to g ra > to J3 >
S S S E -a S
X O X O C ><
W o u u to S
J3
.— w
5 w 2
•OK « Ji
v ^ c E u
eo *P
.
'0 "0
-a =
S "g
a. .5
o\
^
CK
E
S
oo 5?
0 0 « °
88 Is II
">-«.§§ in i
SS£?| Ss
c i? § ><
*S « a §•
E 2 I | -g
•§ §• ! .s s
All contaminated soil a
wastes will be cleaned
below one area percen
using polarized light m
and at or below backgi
levels for nickel
rtT
OJ
« £
•g 'oD »0
re 60 S '0 4-r
Excavating and consolidating asbestos-
nickel-contaminated soil and debris;
constructing onsite underground waste
management unit (WMU) and disposin
contaminated soil in WMU; capping W
regrading excavated area; decontamina
debris; monitoring soil moisture conten
air, and personnel; and implementing
institutional controls
o .,
O n *~*
18s -1!
Jr w -S *e S3
fx QJ t- ^ y
s a 1 g 1
jy m
- i-llp
-§^° i fe ?-S
liliafi
3 ^ 3 5 g !
i>^agu^
'e M & "S ~ D-
aS-s §£ | g
c M a « i- i a
8^^°§^
n^nai
., ^ -a
*«§!?.!
o^^3|^
Excavation and offsite disposal of lead-
contaminated soil; continued operation
GW pumping and treatment system for
upper aquifer; pumping and treatment
from upper aquitard and lower aquifer
air stripping; offsite discharge of all tre
into infiltration basins or irrigation can
GW monitoring
w -a
c §1 S
SS^.S
M r* flj U us
S -g -g g J ss
l| 'S & 8 I
T! a g>g g>^
S.ilbl&
'g B I ^ -3 .§
5 2 .E o .S E
i u TJ .s;
c > c ~A
.«
— •
•s c a aj
5 2.S E
.
S S
I
•8
31 ^
427
-------
•£
I
c
v y
If
Si ^
'& 1
•8
a
2
'S.
3
'o
c
OJ
c
1
S
wi
S
o
a
3
TO
OJ
u
^
*s
u
g.'S
E
0
£
s
li
v5
OJ
E
D
O
w
Vi
1
u
XI
Threat/Pt
§
S'O
3
V _
5.S
11
.2? S
C/3
(2
E
O
'&
00
CO
CO
in
g
co"
V)
1
5
.2
1
!3
10
Q
""
M
>
.S
1
t4_l
O
.2
•a
ffl
g
o
K
Ctf
•a
B
18
B
O
•a
J8
>
S
X
tL)
1
!
^
B
8
1
T3
B
10
1
6
-~
'i
|
6
Ov
"TO
'E
18
>ii
&
1
W
h2
5
•—
c
•§
18
g
_
8
"§
15
c
'E
W
c
o
u
^
1
•B
1
c^
_B
£
i
1
O
•a
TO
^
^
V3
TO
1
U
1
E
J
60
_C
^
_c
1
CO
\
0
o
o
o
rC
ft
$
'S
D
0
Cfl
O
^
^
C
1
^u
'E
re
S
°
'tfl
3
B
B
S
g
_g
.a
.^^
^
S
1
U
1
'£
a u o
.. _ « •= P
J8
1|
I
ii
ij
^ S
o &
g I
'O ^
8'i
^8
£2 M
1
o
1-g
!S E -3 =
5 2 .S-g
cs 'o,
s 3
^i m Q
u S K
8
428
-------
o,
I
•s.5?0
S 2-§ fc^o;
7 -3 •*• 3 .g
I 2 .s -s » I
^ -a S og
S«gl
.* CJP"
5
II
"a
'B
1
E
•g
ra
•go
^iSi
_ ^ a O. «j
'" E W > b
c 3 "- > C
O Q, ra O 5
W '
I «.i|
•§•§ sE
1 S'S5
||B2
o a-a c
s e 8 w
fir«i
3-Hl
•a B 3 c
c S -3 5
O -C C o
HHlBB
0 c -a S .E H £
fig
QJ r~t
§i
a S
'i-S S
"3 Cu ^-<
5 & o
ra C
., o
»s
•§ 2
• Q.
c;
I
•— ^••TL « c .„»•- e
eou-^«^aSo
e !2 M ., — .2 e « -a
lillUPI
I
C/3
I
Si c
PE
u
C w
o g
ll
K I
S
S
E
E £ S S S
429
-------
"5 -g a
o c g
^ _ a
d -S US
I
o
a.
1
•»
^H ^*
a E
§.!
o QJ
"S
:
>
i
> (U
B
M
11 "5
! ^
' i)
*
* S?
§
S
1
_C
PH
*~. -52s
••3^pj=4-1
O S o
.2 '5, §
u O. t.
S'E^
2 "° 3
S .b o*
" 5 ™
l^t
> S 2 i
1 g «c
I g 1 *
O •& *O C/3
13
2 T3
8«^«
"1 «1
•a a E i S3
C CO S X.3
CO E ^ X E
a E 1 -a &
$ 3 .S a 0
g>
§rz3
U
"™s t2
|^ | 8 1
|| 1 S s
BO. A r-l ^H
Ov
0 «»
o ,-* O
o " 8 _
oo g o o g
S § H 8' 1
oo" o, S mm
w S ? tfi -S
"H "™"
1 2^
— ri 3
ei^
^2cg*
.E"S^S =
g"«Sfe
™ js w y °
|| |l?
li.li:-
illil
"§
w c S
^ O ft
Q. wa OJ
•fi'g-S
to 4) >^ £
'3 '3 B ^
%£ '1 "
E^-l 1
I's!>!
gj « -p '2
||| i
g » Q
I'll ^
o<§8 i
"O
S
(A
o
z
.g
p
IS3
E!
2 "u
U yj &
&• ^s "O
O > §
j£
VI V]
5 1
TJ _;
c i -i ^
.i2 3 S c S
i o -i 11 &
j M 3 O &-•§
JlllS J
! ^ B g -g Ji
; a S •=< -S -3
§.11
S
I Mlllli
i > D, vS w O,
o
C >
u •£
O ;*
c7^-!
S 5 e
_c
E
^—'
« a
OH 6
5 3
430
-------
*-SG.^E™
£jg|j°2§<3 = .a
^gfpl^^H
^0^|-|8^|!
E-HU «'C.Eoin'Si2
•.
3
T3
fi
S .->*. U 01
o _
*a
'g.S
'" 'u D. u c A, ta TJ
g-asg-gl - s
sl.t!l°|l
•= E^J c — Jt> E -6
- a .Si S -° 3 n
•3 .H -p o. o
S E £ p -p
niiili!
|l.i°
03-|- •-"
X
I
01
I
ffl
w
a
13
oo
8
O ,
8
o
•a
c
™
(X)
C
sl
il!^
2 "i '2 „-
5 c9 ci-
llfs
ill!
.E K o a,
60
c
•a
_o
"5
v
T3 e
C «
" 2s
w .S C
Si I
- E
g-o'i
Ifl
111
& S. § S
O
a-g
s s
431
-------
I
I 5?
If
a <
OH
| g
I |
1 I
•u
B
M
II tfl ^| B5
SflS^lSl
SilLMl
o
0"O
SS
Si
•a-a
lill
3
a"
•
IS § -2 S S 42
432
-------
DC C
C O
•s ~a
sSSJfifafl
y; U ffl « C 'O W C 18
•° ™ g « J
1 v e ° i
s s is»
o." g-a =3
^gl|
o^ I g o
gllJ-S-S
a S <• s» "5
1 E -a ^ S
; o c
i >- ™
i •S s
e 5
!=§
Q S
o
1/1
co~
* I
§ |
1
c 0 Si
u e ra i
"SSt-a
*- T3 P 3
4J ft c 6
QJ W 4-j 60
a-g S &
= 2 .S g
* w e I
S^l!
1-8 §1,
iiin
5« 8.S i.
^
..S
| o
°"§
s ™
u
1
o
2
"111
c E '- «
5 £
CO
§1 8
D,
1
CO
_e
2
2 .
c gi
3 -S
o o
So
CO
oo
o
CO
$8-3 S 3 12
all °- g S
S^i 55.>b
•8
-S •§
I'
co^i g :
s g^ § -^
433
-------
£ £
B U
01 (J
l!
•i
s
•a
c
re
•8J8
« o
c a,
E =
I I
S.S-S
«
sit
!&§.
B 60S
8-S.S
QJ (M CJ
K 55 j§
11
t^ "cU
c .E
8*
"•
81- s
-sl as
1
U-i
1 |
|B
§ ™
o «>
applicable
a
;c
5
3
S ^^S
•a o e
• g o jj
h continued
B5
1
o
II
CO '£
ii
I
*,K-
li|I
•si i I
E re £ a
S S c "§
O re'-a ra
0 •£ S w"
•^ 1 .5 ^
&
u
'c
3
L
o e
&
CO
o
Z
g 1
1
O
•s
O
3 § 2
434
-------
CD"
I
a
33
i-gf
lj!6
._. «i ,
£.5 2
"u o- o?
I13
«
1
O
ex
3
C
S
o
Components of
Selected Remedy
CD
3
£
tu
IS
1
"S
1
1
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
_o
"So
I
o
o
o
o"
w *
8i
o ~
J2
8 8 -g | « | § g1
ifJ ifrl
3 |
•53 >
"8
s
&
JBt
g>
'
ra
<*
S,
t 3
I 1
to O
§1
•s:
111
fa ^ e
ent using
followed
t plant an
GW pumping and treat
light/chemica oxidation
"S
al o
al treat
ted GW
to the regi
reuse of t
M
J
.
O > a
s
l!
2
435
-------
111
gl
E
on
is
o
1
I
I
LT
O,
00
sfS
in
0
S
**"
18 11 E
g 3-g S
.E i- c ~S
S3 7 .§ |
c 8 a .a.
« o 2 3
&Z "'c
I 3 ff.S
a 3 jS-u
^ I J2 1 £
U OOTJ W O
8.
I
I
II
2.S
fe
8
5 B-fi
<* £ B
*> s. i
W C? f
a
(0
§1
<* S E
].E E S
'§:w u e,
•E S -S "
9.b
5™
o
s §
I Sll
3 -O
.n «
D.
S «
11.^
o..y B
..S- § >
§ la
1
1
a »
c .S
'§•3
U > ra
1
jj c -a
"3 S S
> S &.
s
8=-
o 2
I!
I
ra
60
CO u
II
3 5
a u
£•8
"8
o
I
«
u
icS
^P! 521
o
" 2
111
lir
«> a- a.
o--£ k.
c S"2
C II
4-1 QJ
s s
11
I.S
11
u >
a
c
§ -
•5
•| w
l!
el
|.lg
U > a
*l
|cs
•§--
O M
C CiJ
CO H
I
.f
S
£
52
'I -,-
a, u.
§
5s
436
-------
If
ra
a
t/3
jl
>• „_
s.s
S B
$ n
J; C
*4-(
o
a
1
1
v^
|a
II
"3 .2?
W5
V
|
U
«£
01
£
"o
,?
u
Q.
C
j
.s
Selected Remedy
OJ
3
"3
a
V3
1
S
23
>
to
£
C
.0
1
Remedial
g
•R
S
8
o^
§
»
.^
01
6
?.
vD
C
8
5*
>
o
T3
C
ca
1
0
L4
3
CO
S
0\
§
o"
o
tv
M"
Is
S S
60 3
£?>S
O X
-c-i
w X
•e o
* =5
S 2
tamina
includi;
>i
1
o
U
60
e
ra
&3
o
8
o"
o
cr>
w
S
IS
.So
" in
S °
E E
— 3
11
3-S
C °
Su
- «2
^^
5 U
0 S
fixation, and replacement into excavated areas
followed by construction of a RCRA cap; GW
w
Jlw
03
&0
CJ
S*"
e
-a nj
c *.
« ^
a"13
3
11
•§••3
11
&
"o
s
Industrial
1
~a
a
c
c
rc
and soil monitoring; and access and land use
E
|
CJ
restrictions and institutional controls on GW
use
09/24/88
1st - Final
o
o
(^
Jf
CO
S
1
I
t/3
(A
1
60
U
1C
1
<
S
J=
o
g
CL
j?
C
i
by soil cover and revegetation; implementation
of erosion control measures; and deed
g
1
n
.c
'1
6
8
v^
w
restrictions
S
^
Residentia,
Levee
a i
and
s
;
ard
issions
treets;
nated
estri
? 18
£
o
437
-------
to
\
\
^
c
1
§
.31
Signature
i Remedial
§
So
g
§o O
f—^ o _ ^
oC "*3 ^-" f
00 w M ^
I-H QU t^ S
S" 5 5 J.
1
1
1
«
•3
flj
'o
•S
£
e
OJ
g
S
•a
c
ra
a.
3 H
»« Q
5 o
o 2
1
I
o
z
:§1
> c
T3 M-
o o
o o
t*s vD cj
SCO .i-
— D.
GW treatment will meet SAWPA
limitations for discharge to
arsenic 2.0 mg/1, cadmium 0.064
OJ
c
u u
3 2
rt
^ t/5 "O
£"§^
S . ?
S ^ §
T3 n. S
C =i
eg O O
*^ U
i|J
^ j3 S£
5 w >
U =3 '-3
2
I
g
z
.£
co"
s
11
. to
1?
o *a
ts 2
E — '
'E 2
If
\ CO
bbiA
E 6
S
o
CO" ™
0 g
~ c
?
•a
'u
1"
a. 03
Ig
w S
g£
y s
S, 03
c>c »r
|^k
•§ e
~ CO
^s
1
8
0
1
'-i
I
'? H if
u ^
M 3 ra « $>
2 c/T
o S .§
O 0 C
111
2
^
i* S
t/3 S O «
0.
.S| S
E|.S
o > S
T3
'0
<
o
IS
i.*
on a<
o
V3
IS
06/25/87
T3
n
CS
o
1
w
O
"o 'o
ja ^§a
•c 1 '» 1
a « c ^
!•§!,§
Ilil
"S c *a -~
jfl 2 c .S
6,-S * ^
^5- C yT ^
.S 2 I 2
E o S jg
•g-S>2-g
*Q 5J" oo re
1° "ll
cq ^ g > o
& O c =3 .i£
OS S o to -a
1
I
1/3
O
Z
•s
•« 'E §
U CO
ti *x> £
2 t-T CQ
c o U
|lf|
8d = :i
•^ o "5 B
<>.££.
^|
l|
.5 t- \
*3 ct) tx
g_3 CM
Ov
GO" o"
fefe
4_ i
C y— ^
S C
si
GW cleanup levels will attain an
overall excess cancer-risk level of
10"* by remediating TCE to 1.5
ug/1, thereby reducing the levels
of other contaminants below their
o
«'8
"c 'S
CQ
< "o
W5 *J
re c
a g
« g
o S
concentrations
08/22/88
438
-------
b
n
I
G
I
a .§
g
I
u.S
CO If
>,
"H,
a.
o re
Lf J
s re
:£ C
Is?
ro a .2
=3 O w
2 2 '5
£ S S
M to
•a
c
3
c
l-v re
S° .E
?s T
I S
fl S-i
: £ £ S1 !
II
iial
<*li1
"e "u
S.S O re .S
§1
g^
E •=
E S
r9 Z.
I
"re
'C
«^
[A
3
•a
c
si«iS!Ui5"O — -5
0&2 al.SS S?
P
s ^ s s
60 c .S 3
Illi
E re J«! c so
^ CX g £j .g
•2 | " T3 P
o °- w "S S
2 S-
I
o
a,,
w p
.
•s S-SB
-S E
C 2 3
"' i
OJ '
Slj£
O,, f e
^^ c
to
.§ -E
.5 0)
r^ "O C
_ I 3 « re S
= E 73 5 go73
2 .S 2 o .S
<
re —
'Eg
Si
|.3
a!
5
-------
t2 -o 2
o S I
5 ra G
sis:
1) O. jjj
g 3 o
Cleanup Goals
,, >,
"S -o
w
£3 E
C OJ
QJ pj
i"s
s 8
1 &
u "5
t/5
U
E
1
Si
V5
ra
5
2
IX
>
8
1
£g
||S|
Sf Sa
a 3 11
w U5 .§> |
c/: BS.
c
.9
6
V
tZ
§
O —
o* G ^^
5^i
Si
°fS£l5§*s
8 "2 i 3 ^ 1
s -d s i g o s
S S "^ S j tu 1?
•sfisS.fflSS
I^OilS
Il8lsl-a§
S^td-ii^
i^|l^"|-H
^Es|2«-i
lK.alillI
fflS
'ilsl
g si
E E « u
a OJ .tS oj
S £ " 1
£ H "*-H O
« O. O
tj _, ^-
S?l
8 S c 6
c 1 „ -2
•3 M W e
re CO "S ft
- ? 2 P
'o S W 2
(55 8 E-6
£
•a , '3
C < ra
w > (fa
M 1 ^
11 1 I «
o
Hi e
S .S S .2
'o
a
•
6 £
T3
C
N
^2 ^|
a 03
g-S S JS
CO 3 _- 3
B I
§10
.- E
« •£ .
'
•Ml
E E <«
18 3 T3
as
O
I
440
-------
V
1
h-
of Decision Summarj
Record
1
|
§
rr
^
111
^ 2 5
a.
o.
3
C
S
a
Components of
Selected Remedy
01
3
"3
>
S
(A
5
01
1
a.
>
§
. c
till
.111!
w 5a .S? S
M pj
C
_o
'5
cti
$6,707,400
.0
s
£
1
-
M
C
n
_u
1
Q
!
dation of cathode waste m;
1
"P^
o
~L
vO
•c
•S
*o
T3
C
IS
O
§
w
•c
S
o
it
u-a
2 Sj
So _§
0 ^
8|
§K
(Q £
oo o.
^1
E ^/
in .g
1 .
landfill, followed by cappi:
placement of a soil cover
i!
^
|8
contamina
asbestos, \
g
s s^
§ 1 e § 3 E
^ C* « C M
21. c ra ,ft* E co
^ C CJ u* C QJ
=
2 'Sb
3 O B
IS ^ CN
_ii t- O
^ 13 2
^ u (S
. < 3
3 S "^
fe Q —
^i. C X
U D. 00
5 | e
o c ^
g'-'S fi 1
•a e •s .£ §
S IS. 9-ll
Ilp11ll
ItilPll
•§ =-s s"f | g
llilillil
8
§ T= 00^
C^ " =1 'S
- J£ 3 ?•
ClJ HH W W
U -5 .£ -a
60 60 8 «
.S .E E u-
~o -e S,'S
5 5 £? §
u u O s«
E C3 E S
&
— GO "fO
•c " .S
1 0 S
^"v
$30,000,001
(present
worth)
•a
> - §
O ^ 4_r
« ^ e
"5 o 'E
o vi
fii
Q^ C _M
*P t-
U W5 QJ
l-2^
U !S 5
!&
co
«>j2
fig
S 0! X-
eu.s o
closure and capping; GW
:nt during closure with offs
GW monitoring; provision
E E5
"§ 3K
J E 0
I-J 4_< 4-1
1
'0
&
O
•z.
•S
Sg^
•8^ §
Ifg
e 1 P
Il-s
O "" W
CJ WJ
O > H
S
1
Northside
Wa
0
TD
g
CO
£j*
U
!_
o t;
Ss
^ x""/
£^
CJ =
•a i/>
"c P
O w
C bO
•S ^
rS .S
sl
r- C
1§
•§•§
^ "
"S- wT
§•8
M 4J
s§
*s
S o S
Mi
111
g
bo
•6
"" nj
to QJ
li
E is
is
IS — .
'S<3
31
I-3
a! |
< 13 o
r c m
f> a \
TJ- 2 0
C
1
^
^
PCB concentration >10 mj
rification; filling entire site;
CS-g
1-
> CA
;-,
1
r T
^
00
^c
^
3
1
organics ii
<
5
uT
Transform
oc
r^
monitoril
O
1
OJ
'53
i
•o
i
B
O
•o
1
ra
u
a.
C
!
i
s
Er
o S
QJ i)
S g
a c
5 •-
npling of onsite wooden sti
ine whether a second O.U.
S |
-a i!
B 01
w -a
ra
Salvage Y
09/15/89
1
441
-------
>
c "2 a
Q C JO
ii " 5
ill
.52
"fO
3
a
y
c
u
^
Components of
Selected Remedy
I
}
CO
1
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
c
.0
'eb
S
§
0 2
§o
-— 0 —
§ a 83
31 si
« sii « -3
•s
(a
1
en
O
z
60
C
a
'C
to
J_<
*CO
60
^e
'w
3
C
OJ
j,
•a
c
CO
a.
E
3
O.
O
"8
O
O >
s
" _
g^
II ?
-eg «
1^ 1
0
s
o 9§
o O
O *^~\ fj
gl 8 3
21 81
£ 1 c
fi E u
•3.E.2
1*1
. OJ
O.T3 60
3 D C
C J3 CO
S.!S •"
_ g ^
u "S "> -a
^ 3 -c 0
^ wj *a
S ^* e
^g2|
S^_g 1
H 7" -S 0
a o M- S
eyi c o u.
be
« a; -E
"" •- •£
r- fc .5 «
§ o = -S
tinue operation of IRM; constructi
treatment system; excavation and
ssal of contaminated soil with soil
maintenance of institutional conti
c > cu-a
8> S2 c
O T3 CO
•a
&
1
VI
0
Z
UJ
w y
O PH
O "O
<=> g
8^«
=5 *S
M "S 60
•a S c
C ra ~
CO C ^
£ 'e -3
O S .S
IRM
South Tacoma
Channel Well 12A,
WA
05/03/85
o
•^
o
w
"8
c
I
*-J
o
Z
BO
rurther action with GW monitorin;
o
"8
c
1
VI
O
Z
S
o
Z
2nd
Toftdahl Drums,
WA
o
*"•
§
„
O^ trt
O ^^
'S 6
o
*-i 2 -a
c aj
W CO tj
"8
S
f- v2
&Sll
IS^l
S « o-
o
•§ w- ~ '.5 | _
•6 ^ -S i I I
" - *
.
5 e- S
5 2 .S .E
E
o
83 <
§
443
-------
I"S
^ ™
a-1
Is3
Components of
•jj
"3? ™
X
£* &
8? E
ro ^
& .£
a
s
°
ws
1
o
o
Cu
3
g-
u
Selected Remedy
u
E
1
a
VI
a
e
tu
J2
s
IX
^
ro
a
S
B
•a
•<
_
•3
dj
E
OS
c
o
'5i
CC
i s!
§"0 °_ —
-H.§ 0 |
Si 51
o
^ QJ -
K - i
.•s|||l
_- O ^ O O
2 -0 ^ .0 ^
e 60^ ^ u
|^ w-d |ja
's M "8 5 ^ 0°
3 > >< x ^ y
< o o u > •<
Soil sampling and analysis of onsite and offsite
areas; excavation and offsite disposal of
selected soil and non-soil materials; excavation
or cleaning and plugging all utility and process
lines in Area I; GW extraction and treatment;
stormwater control; excavation and onsite
disposal of selected soil; excavation of utility
lines; cleaning utility manholes and vaults;
capping; performing bench scale testing of soil
solidification technique; and excavation of Mill
Creek sediment; and performing supplemental
remedial planning studies if GW contamination
migrates
1
1
o
_ -a
"e •S S «
"S "ra
™ 4-1 ? (rt yi *-J
=§" | "§ 'E S e
^ "3 e ^ bo "c
§5 w E . -~ .
-^ 3 3 5 x
O t! 8 > .E PL,
00
c
'«
I
s
^ in
oj m
S3 < \ -a
55 0 s i.
"-1 B 5i
•S 8-i
13 « -|
>< x:
« 5u
i ^ ob
>•— "Jv
S fe =
•~ c ^
Q ra **-<
(^ u O
Soil sampling in all on- and off-property areas
and waste sampling in Area I; excavation and
offsite disposal of highly contaminated soil and
1
I
O
z
,vT
QJ *S
"O "C
* ?
g 5 "S
• — e
M ra E
a">" c
So 8
00
c
§
b
lM
&H
E
tj
S <
5 5
0
^^
£
8
c
o
ll
Jl
"S 0
— w
§"B
Ji
13 M
8!
other wastes found in Area I and capping the
excavated area; excavation and onsite or offsite
•o
M ™
^ y
c£
bp ^
=5 u
•73
•— rj
d 9
>3
v£>
*
^T
^
S
3
^
*
i
0
D,
<
Q
C/3
disposal of soil found in off-property areas and
covering the remaining surface soil; onsite or
offsite disposal of all buried containerized
Is"
£? ^* "o
o - c
*2 c?
•s 1 *
^ too C
g :— j:
3 — ^
2 .1 g
^.
c
i
c
V
e
*— '
ta
-------
SECTION V
RECORDS OF DECISION
KEYWORD LIST: FY 1982-1990
The ROD Keyword List presents the RODs approved from FY 1982-1990 by major
keyword categories and subcategories. The list is a compilation of those keywords
identified for each site in the ROD abstracts found at the beginning of this document.
The first two pages of this list provide an index of all keyword categories and
subcategories. The following text lists those RODs associated with each keyword.
-------
RECORD OF DECISION KEYWORD LIST INDEX
Listed below are major keyword categories and their subcategories for Superfund Records of
Decision (RODs).
Primary Hazardous
Substances Detected
Acids
Arsenic
Asbestos
Benzene
Carcinogenic Compounds
Chromium
Dioxin
Inorganics (other than metals)
Lead
Metals
Mining Wastes
Oils
Organics
PAHs
PCBs
PCE
Pesticides
Phenols
Radioactive Materials
Solvents
TCE
Toluene
VOCs
Xylenes
Contaminated Media
Air
Debris
Ground Water
Sediment
Sludge
Soil
Surface Water
Public Health and
Environmental Threats
Direct Contact
Public Exposure
Remedy Selection
ARAR Waiver
Institutional Controls
Interim Remedy
No Action Remedy
O&M
ROD Amendment
Water Supply
Alternate Water Supply
Drinking Water Contaminants
Site-Specific Characteristics
Hoodplain
Sole-Source Aquifer
Wetlands
Standards/Regulations/Permits/
Guidance
Hybrid/Alternate Closure (not under RCRA)
ARARs (not listed as a keyword after FY
1988)
Clean Air Act
Clean Water Act
Water Quality Criteria
RCRA
Closure Requirements
Clean Closure
Landfill Closure
Safe Drinking Water Act
MCLs
MCLGs
State Standards/Regulations
Toxic Substances Control Act
Public Health Advisory
State Guidance
State Permit
Testing/Pilot Studies
Leachability Tests
Treatability Studies
Technology
Aeration
Air Monitoring
Air Stripping
447
-------
RECORD OF DECISION KEYWORD LIST INDEX
(Continued)
Biodegradation/Land Application
Capping
Carbon Adsorption (GAC)
Decontamination
Dredging
Excavation
Filling
Ground Water Monitoring
Ground Water Treatment
Incineration/Thermal Destruction
Leachate Collection/Treatment
Levees
Offsite Discharge
Offsite Disposal
Offsite Treatment
Onsite Containment
Onsite Discharge
Onsite Disposal (includes residuals)
Onsite Treatment
Plume Management
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
Relocation
Slurry Wall
Soil Washing/Flushing
Solidification/Stabilization
Solvent Extraction
Surface Water Collection/Diversion
Surface Water Monitoring
Surface Water Treatment
Temporary Storage
Treatment Technology
Vacuum Extraction
Venting
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Vitrification
Miscellaneous
Municipally Owned Site
Historically Significant
ACL
Background Levels
Deferred Decision
Initial Remedial Measure (IRM)
Contingent Remedy
448
-------
SUPERFUND RECORDS OF DECISION: KEYWORD LIST
Listed below are major keyword categories and their subcategories for Superfund Records of
Decision (RODs). Following each of these categories is a broad sampling of RODs containing the
listed keyword. Some categories may become obsolete or new categories may develop over time
due to changes in the focus of the Superfund remedy selection process; these categories have been
noted, as appropriate. The Superfund managers in each Region have copies of all RODs.
KEYWORDS (BY CATEGORY) AND ASSOCIATED ROD SITES
(BY SITE, STATE (REGION))
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Acids
Charles George, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical,
MA (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Chemical
Control, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; PAS Oswego, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal,
PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site,
PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL
(FV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Hunts Disposal, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Northside
Sanitary Landfill/ Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Highlands Acid
Pit, TX (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII);
Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mines, CA
(IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Gould, OR (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD WA (X);
Western Processing, WA (X)
Arsenic
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*;
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA
(I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; W.R.
Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical
Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical
(09/28/90), NY (II)*; D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II);
Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue
Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street
School, NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY
(II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II);
Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III);
Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Hederson Road, PA (III); Lord Shope
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
449
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Arsenic (continued)
Landfill, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA
(III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88), DE
(III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape
Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Davie
Landfill, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL
(IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal (03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump, KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Sapp Battery,
FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV);
Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*;
Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest
Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Master Disposal Service
Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO II, IN (V); Morris Arsenic, MN (V); New
Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI
(V)*; Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); South Andover, MN (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V);
Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS
(VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East
Industrial Park), NE (VII); Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Weldon
Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*; East Helena,
MT (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln
Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII);
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz
Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA
(IX); Commencement Bay/NearShore (09/30/89), WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
Asbestos
Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler
Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*;
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (HI); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Cape Fear Wood
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
450
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Asbestos (continued)
Preserving, NC (IV); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V);
Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA (IX)*; Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*;
Martin Marietta, OR (X)
Benzene
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I);
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery,
RI (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT
(I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Leaman
Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA
Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ
(II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*;
Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY
(II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville
Landfill, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;
Volney Landfill, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ
(II); York Oil, NY (II); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion,
PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III);
Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*;Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane and Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III);
M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Westline, PA (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III);
Airco, KY (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);
Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV);
Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Bofors
Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN
(V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/30/88), MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN
(V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI
(V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
451
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Benzene (continued)
Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN
(V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Summit National, OH (V);
U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil,
IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pits, TX (VI)*; Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO
(VII);Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump,
IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden
Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18), CO (VIII)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM
Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*;
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment) (09/28/90),
CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X)
Carcinogenic Compounds
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I); Charles George, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid
Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs,
MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT
(I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery
Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),
NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (ID*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking,
NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier
Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA
Technical Center, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Glen Ridge
Radium, NJ (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco
Polymer, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals,
NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West
Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery
Township, NJ (II); Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage,
NY (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
452
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Carcinogenic Compounds (continued)
Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II);
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township
Route 532, NJ (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA
(III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III);
Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem
(09/28/90), PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA
(III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Fike
Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown
PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill,
PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III);
M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (HI)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand
Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson Dump #1,
PA (III)*; Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PA (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV);
Airco,KY (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV);
Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater
Contamination, NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn,
SC (PvO; Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
(IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment),
FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal
(03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm,
KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco
Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill,
IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage
Yard, IL (V)*; Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Ionia
City Landfill MI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long
Prairie, MN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V);
Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/ Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical
(09/20/90), MI (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park) (09/28/90), MN
(V)*; Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
453
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Carcinogenic Compounds (continued)
Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*;
Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN
(V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bailey Waste
Disposal, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill,
AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Pesses
Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*;
South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK
(VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Northwestern States
Portland Cement, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach,
MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon
Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20,
WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky
Rats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO
(VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*;
Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT
(VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos
Mine (09/21/90), CA (IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ
(IX)*; MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX); Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX)*; San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX);
Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area,
CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Tucson
International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Near shore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X)*; Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA),
OR (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
454
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Chromium
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical,
NH (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical,
NJ (II); DTmperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*;
FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ
(II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang
Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II);
Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers,
NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney
Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP,
PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA
(III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA
Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);1 McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne
Landfill, PA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; 62nd
Street Dump, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV);
Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC(IV);
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M
Oil), SC (FV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe
Valley Landfill, KY (FV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump,
KY (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville Road
Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV);
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground,
OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*;
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Novaco Industries, MI (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz
Dump (09/30/87), WI (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN
(V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I
(03/18/8), TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination
(FAR-MAR-CO), NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern States
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDO Enforcement Decision Document
455
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Chromium (continued)
Portland Cement, IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII); Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII);
Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Del Norte, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ*; Louisiana-Pacific,
CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); FMC Yakima Pit, WA
(X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X); United Chrome, OR
(X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Dioxin
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II);
Love Canal, NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Havertown
PCP, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; American Creosote Works, FL (IV);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*;
Vertac, AR (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Ellisville MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO
(VII)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO
(VII); Times Beach, MO (VII); Times Beach (09/28/88), MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO
(VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX)
Inorganics
Auburn Road, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA
(I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Sylvester, NH (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ
(II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II);
Friedman Property, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Roebling Steel, NJ (II);
Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III);
Chisman Creek (03/31/88), VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA
(III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Limestone Road,
MD (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire
Fire, VA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wade, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); A.
L. Taylor, KY (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Distler Brickyard,
KY (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV);
Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
456
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Inorganics (continued)
Landfill, FL (IV); Newport Dump, KY (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*;
Acme Solvents, IL (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bower's Landfill,
OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste (06/30/86), MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal (03/31/88), MI
(V)*; Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid
Disposal, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township,
MI (V); South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cimarron
Mining, NM (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Mid-South Wood,
AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee
County/Galena, KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Syntex
Verona, MO (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central
City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Iron Mountain
Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); South
Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division),
CA (IX); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X)
Lead
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse
Park, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
(I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat,
NY (II)*; Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
(II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont
Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan
Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
(II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1,
NY (II)*; Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil,
NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); C&R
Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road
Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III);
Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
457
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Lead (continued)
M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III);
Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Walsh
Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat
Landfill (11/28/88), DE (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination,
NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (FV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Rowood, MS (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard,
IL (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V);
Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
(V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), IL (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Wauconda Sand &
Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Gurley Pit, AR
(VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*;
Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001),
OK Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Pesses
Chemical, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK
(VI); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Doepke Disposal (Holliday),
KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East
Industrial Park), NE (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm,
IA (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel
Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal
Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT
(VIII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek,
CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill
Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale
Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield
Airport, AZ (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA
(IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X);
Gould, OR (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
Metals
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill (09/29/89), NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA
(I); Baird & McGuire (09/27/90), MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 &
4, MA (I)*; Charles George, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
458
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Metals (continued)
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge
Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA
(I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottari & Goss/Great
Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*;
South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester,
NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ
(II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II);
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical
Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property
(09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Forest Glen
Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY
(II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems,
NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal,
NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ
(II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville
Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sharkey
Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syncon
Resins, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Army Creek
Landfill, DE (III); Army Creek Landfill (06/29/90), DE (III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Blosenski
Landfill, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA
(III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE
(III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA
(III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air
Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III);
Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Havertown PCP,
PA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III);
Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III);
McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III);
M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton
Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Sand Gravel & Stone (09/28/90), MD
(III)*; US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wade, PA (III);
West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE
(III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88), DE (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
459
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Metals (continued)
Contamination, NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn,
SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC
(IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving
(Amendment), FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY
(IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL
(IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS
(IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL
(IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp
Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV);
A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*; Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI
(V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Coshocton Landfill, OH (V);
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal (03/31/88),
MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts
Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake
Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I,
IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V);
New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove
Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard
NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); South
Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota,
MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel (03/31/89), IL (V)*; Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal
Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit (06/26/87), TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);
Johns-Manville, IL (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sand Springs, OK
(VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83,
NM (VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear,
NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
460
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Metals (continued)
Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Kem-Pest
Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint
& Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits
(USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII);
Anaconda Smelter/Mill Metals Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Milltown, MT
(VIII); Milltown-S, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity
Properties, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*;
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sharon Steel
(Midvaie Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union
Pacific, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville,
CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works (09/30/85), CA (IX)*; Coalinga
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow
Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier
Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA),
OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing (09/25/85), WA
(X)*
Mining Wastes
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI);
Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*;
Milltown, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
(VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII);
Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X)
Oils
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); McKin, ME (I)*; American Thermostat, NY
(II)*; Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Pijak
Farm, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Avtex Fibers,
VA (III)*; Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon (09/29/86), PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal,
PA(III)*; Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
461
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Oils (continued)
FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV);
Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest
Waste, MI (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (06/30/89), OH (V)*; New Lyme,
OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Old Mill, OH (V);
Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Arkansas City
Dump, KS (VII)*; Ellisville, MO (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water,
MT (VIII)*; Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
Organics/VOCs
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill (09/29/89), NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA
(I); Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill (09/28/90), CT (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA
(I); Charles George, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA
(I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
Keefe Environmental Services (03/21/88), NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I);
Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park,
CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90),, VT (I)*; Ottati and
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);
Re-Solve (09/24/87), MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I);
Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I);
Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II);
Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89), NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well Field (09/29/88),
NY (II)*; Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Hy Bog (09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel
& Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; Chemical
Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,
NY (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical,
NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II);
Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA
Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II);
Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II);
Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II);
Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II);
Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue
Wellfield (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ
(II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ
(II); Lone Pine Landfill (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
462
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Organics/VOCs (continued)
NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery
(09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Clean Well
Field, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand
Restoration, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Solvent Savers, NY (II); Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ
(II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega
Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland
Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex Fibers, VA
(III)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Butz Landfill, PA (III); Coker's Sanitation
Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Croydon TCE
Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem (09/28/90), PA (III)*; Delaware Sand
and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (06/30/89), PA (III)*; Dover Air Force Base,
DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (05/13/86), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/29/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road
(09/29/89), PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation
Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown
Pesticide, WV (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III);
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA
(III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; New Castle Spill, DE (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking,
PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Sand Gravel & Stone (09/28/90), MD
(III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III);
Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (09/30/88), PA (III)*; Tyson's
Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Wade, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III);
Westline, PA (III)*; Westline (06/29/88), PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West
Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill,
DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC
(IV); Airco, KY (IV); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (09/29/89), FL (IV)*; Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape
Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Coleman Evans, FL
(IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Gallaway
Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL
(PvO; Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
463
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Organics/VOCs (continued)
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (FV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powerville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff
Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*;
Acme Solvents, IL (V); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Anderson Development, MI (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V);
Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI
(V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*;
Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix (09/30/85), MI (V)*; Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH
(V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V);
Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V);
Kummer Landfill, MN (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/30/88), MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary
Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*;
Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg
Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V);
Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Interim
Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton/St. Anthony-IRM, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAPP), MN
(V)*; New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill,
WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (03/31/90), MI (V)*;
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar
& Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH
(V); Rose Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona
Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*;
Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN
(V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Dixie
Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);
Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Highlands Acid Pit (06/27/87), TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/30/88), TX (VI)*; North
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
464
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Organics/VOCs (continued)
Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI);
Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM
(VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*;
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR
(VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big River
Sand, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque
Works, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO
(VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII);
Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Northwestern States
Portland Cement, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Syntex
Verona, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly
Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*;
Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII);
Libby Ground Water (12/30/88), MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII);
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA
(IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
(IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment) (09/28/90), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1),
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San
Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA
(IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits (07/17/84), CA (IX); Stringfellow
Acid Pits (06/25/87), CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX);
Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner-IRM, WA (X); Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*;
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing
(09/04/86), WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
465
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
PAHs (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I);
Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Iron Horse Park, MA (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill
(09/22/88), VT (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H,
MA (I); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater
Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Woodland
Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(06/24/88), PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane &
Lombard, MD (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Walsh
Landfill, PA (III); Westline Site, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV); American Creosote
Works, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV)*;
Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear
Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich,
B.F., KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm,
KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; K&L Landfill, MI (V); Lake Sandy
Jo, IN (V);Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*;
Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly
Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V);
Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI);
Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva
Industries, TX (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North
Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United
Creosoting (09/29/89), TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Doepke
Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO
(VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Western Processing (09/25/85), WA
(X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
466
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls)
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes,
NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,
MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH
(I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Clothier Disposal,NY (II); FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II);
Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Ludlow Sand
& Gravel, NY (II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Roebling Steel,
NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY
(II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY
(II)*; Wide Beach, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel,
DE (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III);
Lehigh Electric, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing
(06/29/90), PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV);
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's
Farm, KY (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V); A&F Materials-IRM, IL
(V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Berlin & Farro, MI
(V); Biphenyls Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*;
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL
(V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (06/30/89),
OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II,
IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/ Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Old Mill, OH (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V);
Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V);
Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR,
(VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI);
Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Doepke Disposal (Holliday),
KS (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits
(USDOE), MO (VII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Purity
Oil Sales, CA (IX); Taputimu Farm, AS (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X);
Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA
(X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
467
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
PCE (Tetrachloroethylene/Perchloroethylene)
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT(I); Old
Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Picillo Farm, RI (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South
Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*;
Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well Field (09/29/88), NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont
Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; Higgins
Farm, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ
(II)*; Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems,
NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred
Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II);
Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers,
NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Cryo-Chem, PA (III);
Cryo-Chem (09/29/90), PA (III)*; Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lord
Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III);
Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries,
FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI
Dixiana, SC (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL
(V)*; Byron Salvage Yard (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*;
FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;
Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*;
Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora
Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); National Presto
Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Northernaire Plating,
MI (V)*; Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*;
Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); South Andover, MN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau
Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Geneva Industries, TX
(VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,
TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South
Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO (VII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense
Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
468
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
PCE (Tetrachloroethylene/Perchloroethylene) (continued)
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX);
Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel
Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); Watkins
Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X);
South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*
Pesticides
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth MA (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali,
NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal
(10/26/87), NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School (09/26/88), NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II);
Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Renora, Inc., NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III);
Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway
Six, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI
Dixiana, SC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL
(IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Bayou
Sorrel, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Rogers Road
Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Doepke
Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal
Service, MO (VII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*;
Del Norte, CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);
Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Taputimu Farm, AS (IX);
FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
469
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Phenols
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Norwood PCBs,
MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Goose
Farm, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-HDD, NY (II); Lipari
Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love
Canal, NY (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Pijak Farm, NJ
(II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II);
Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland
Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA
(III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA
(III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III);
Westline, PA (III); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar &
Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Ellisville, MO
(VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII);
Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Fairchild
Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX);
Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Radioactive Materials
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange
Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Radium Chemical, NY (ID;
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation (09/22/89), PA (III)*; Moyer Landfill, PA (III); United
Nuclear, NM (VI); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Denver Radium Site
Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Monticello Mill Tailings
(DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Rocky Hats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII);
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
Solvents
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
McKin, ME (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI
(I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Burnt
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
470
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Solvents (continued)
Fly Bog, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II);
Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II);
Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal, NY (II); Avtex
Fibers, VA (III)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Enterprise
Avenue, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Henderson Road, PA (HI)*; Lackawanna Refuse
Site, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Harris/Palm Bay
Facility, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V);
Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI
(V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hagen Farm,
WI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V);
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton-Interim Water
Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Summit National, OH (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001),
OK (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX);
Applied Materials, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX);
Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport,
AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Taputimu
Farm, AS (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders
Corner-IRM, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma,
WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
TCE (Trichloroethylene)
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Charles George, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid
Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental
Services, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*;
McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield
Landfill (09/22/88), VT (I)*; Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I);
Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY
(II); Brewster Well Field (09/29/88), NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ
(II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ
(II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe
Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); DTmperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property,
NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street,
NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lone
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
471
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
TCE (Trichloroethylene) (continued)
Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90),
NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Old Bethpage, NY (II); Clean Well Field, NY (II);
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill,
NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vega
Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Bendix, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Butz Landfill,
PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fischer &
Porter, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); Keystone
Sanitation Landfill, PA (HI); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; Limestone Road,
MD (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer
Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III);
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's
Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; City Industries, FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL
(IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F
Materials-HDD, IL (V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL
(V)*; Byron Salvage Yard (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix (09/30/85), MI (V)*;
Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V);
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*;
Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old
Landfill, WI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN
(V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie,
MN (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI
(V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); National
Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton-Interim
Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/St. Anthony-IRM,
MN (V); New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire
Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); South Andover, MN (V); Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM,
MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*;
Wausau Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South
Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
472
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
TCE (Trichloroethylene) (continued)
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
(VII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO O/III)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18),
CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials,
CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Indian
Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA
(IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ; Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA
(IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA
(IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando
Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel/Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA
(IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson
International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA
(X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South
Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Western Processing, WA (X)
Toluene
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles George, MA (I);
Industri-plex, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89), NJ (II)*; Bridgeport,
NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II);
Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II);
D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical
Center (09/28/90), NJ (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II);
Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85),
NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY
(II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Syosset
Landfill, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP,
PA 011); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD
(III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Sand Gravel &
Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough,
PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; A. L. Taylor, KY (IV); Airco, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV);
Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
473
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Toluene
(IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site,
KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V); Forest Waste Disposal,
MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); K&L
Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); MIDCO I, IN
(V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance
Plant, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oak Grove Landfill,
MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Republic
Steel Quarry, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*;
Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well
Field, MI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI);
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);
Ellisville, MO (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm,
IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service,
MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII);
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Fairchild
Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA
(IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*;
Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western Processing,
WA (X)*
Xylenes
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Old Springfield Landfill
(09/29/90), VT (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;
Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*;
FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*;
Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Dover Air Force
Base, DE (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA
(III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); SCRDI Bluff
Road, SC (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
474
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Xylenes (continued)
(V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts
Disposal, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill,
WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Northernaire Plating,
MI (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI
(V); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Fairchild Semicond
(Mt. View), CA (IX); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20,
WY (VIII); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Solvent Service, CA (IX)
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Air
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Landfill & Resource
Recovery, RI (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Combe Fill South
Landfill, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II);
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Saltville
Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Wade, PA (III); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL
(V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI
(V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill
Creek, MT (VIII); Denver Radium II, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Coalinga Asbestos
Mine, CA (IX)*; Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX);
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos
Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Taputimu Farm, AS (IX); South Tacoma, WA (X)
Debris
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Norwood
PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski
Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum,
NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY
(II)*; GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace
Petrochemicals, NY (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Radium
Chemical, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
475
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Debris
Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA
(III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Delaware Sand
and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (HI); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air
Force Base, DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Havertown PCP,
PA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD
(III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Publicker/Cuyahoga
Wrecking, PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat
Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC
(IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Lewisburg Dump,
TN (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL
(IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Ionia
City Landfill, MI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil,
OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI
(V)*; NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Summit National, OH (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve
Reber, LA (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK
(VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO
(VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; White Farm Equipment Dump, IA
(VII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Martin Marietta,
Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity
Properties, UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties (09/29/89), UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial,
CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX);
South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87),
WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X)
Ground Water
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire
(09/27/90), MA (I)*; Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering,
MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco
Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services,
NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Laurel
Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Ottati &
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);
Re-Solve (09/24/87), MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South
Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
476
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Ground Water (continued)
Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek
Farm (06/28/89), NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II);
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*;
Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ
(II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village
Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Friedman
Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Higgins
Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY
(II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems
(09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township (06/30/88), NJ (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II);
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Price Landfill (09/29/86), NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora, Inc.,
NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair
Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Suffern
Village Well Field, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ
(II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal,
NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Army Creek Landfill (06/29/90), DE (III)*;
Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit,
PA (HI); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon (09/29/86), PA (III)*;
Butz Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill,
PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal(Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA
(III); Drake Chemical (05/13/86), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Fischer & Porter, PA (III);
Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road
(09/29/89), PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Limestone Road, MD (III); Lord Shope
Landfill, PA (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA
(III)*; Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Spill,
DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Sand Gravel & Stone (09/28/90), MD
(III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III);
Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US Titanium, VA (III);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
477
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Ground Water (continued)
Wade, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Westline, PA (III); Westline, PA (III)*; West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill,
DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote
Works, FL (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (TV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman Evans,
FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Distler
Brickyard, KY (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV);
National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery,
FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Sodyeco,
NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV);
Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Varsol Spill Site, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits,
FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*; A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Acme
Solvents, IL (V); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arcanum Iron
& Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH
(V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron Salvage
Yard, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix (09/30/85),
MI (V)*; Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V);
Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau
Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest
Waste, MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers,
IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill (07/17/89), OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill,
WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer
Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical
Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Well Field, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Master
Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New
Brighton/St. Anthony-IRM, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New
Brighton-Interim Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New
Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Novaco
Industries, MI (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI
(V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical
(St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
478
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Ground Water (continued)
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona
Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel (03/31/89), IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI
(V); Wausau Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87),
LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil
Lindsey, AR (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit
(06/26/87), TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South
Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI);
Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI); Odessa Chromium II (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products, AR
(VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol
Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tar
Creek, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK
(VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*;
Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*; Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des
Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII);
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern
States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII);
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal
Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water (12/30/88), MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO
(VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Milltown-S, MT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII);
Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX);
Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX);
Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ; Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX);
McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1) (09/29/88), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow
Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson
International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA
(X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
479
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Ground Water (continued)
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders
Corner-IRM, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South
Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12 A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X); Western
Processing, WA (X); Western Processing (09/04/88), WA (X)»
Sediments (Creek/River/Stream)
Auburn Road, NH (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George
Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond,
MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA
(I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA
(I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski
Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY
(II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Combe Fill
South Landfill, NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY
(II); Hudson River, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal (10/26/87), NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel,
NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Wide
Beach, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York
Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA
(III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman
Creek, VA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Limestone
Road, MD (III); Millcreek, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton
Zinc, PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Westline, PA (III);
West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Airco, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving,
NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
(IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal,
FL (IV)*; National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery,
FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV);
Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Fields Brook, OH (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hunts
Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical
Utilities, IL (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V);
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
480
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Sediments (Creek/River/Stream) (continued)
Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V);
Seymour, IN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN
(V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI);
Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87), LA (VI)*; Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal
Chemical, TX (VI); Sediments (Creek/River/Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade
Street, TX (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); South Calvacade
Street, TX (VI); Texarkarta Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Vertac, AR (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII);
Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); Burlington Northern
(Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; East
Helena, MT (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO
(VIII); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)
Sludge
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA
(I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY
(II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
(II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ
(II); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE
(HI); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Lackawanna
Refuse Site, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V);
Anderson Development, MI (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Bofors
Nobel, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Forest Waste IRM, MI (V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V)*;
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason
County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Newlyme, OH (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio
Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Gurley
Pitt-Edd, AK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AK (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Old
Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pitts, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Vertac, AR
(VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Weldon Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; McColl, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);
Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
481
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Soil
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Beacon Heights,
CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I);
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond,
MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field,
CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA
(I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo
Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Re-Solve (09/24/87), MA (I)*; Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Western Sand &
Gravel, RI (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat,
NY (II)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport,
NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II);
Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control (09/23/87), NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II);
Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property
(09/29/89), NJ (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/24/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau,
NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen
Ridge Radium, NJ (II)*; Goose Farm, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco
Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Hyde
Park-EDO, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang
Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; ; Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY
(II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metal tec /Aerosystems,
NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ
(II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); PAS Oswego,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ
(II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill,
NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II);
SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon
Resins, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams Property, NJ
(II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY
(II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex
Fibers, VA (III)*; Bendix, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III);
Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig
Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force
Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*; Greenwood
Chemical, VA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard,
PA (HI); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA, (III); Lansdowne Radiation (09/22/86), PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide,
WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
482
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Soil (continued)
McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds,
VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (HI); Taylor Borough, PA (III);
Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); US Titanium, VA
(III); Wade, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III);
West Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway
Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL
(IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC
(IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV);
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV);
Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Lewisburg Dump,
TN (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV);
Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V);
A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*; Acme Solvents, IL (V); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke,
OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V);
Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage
Yard, IL (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Distler
Brickyard, KY (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest
Waste, MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);
Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V);
K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V);
LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil
(06/30/89), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V);
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Morris Arsenic, MN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation
and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill,
OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment),
IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*;
Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*;
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI
(V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Wauconda Sand
& Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel (03/31/89), IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste
Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87), LA (VI)*; Bayou
Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Crystal Chemical,
TX (VI); Crystal City, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley
Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland
Products, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers Road
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
483
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Soil (continued)
Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol
Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tenth
Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Creosoting
(09/29/89), TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump,
KS (VII)*; Big River Sand, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII);
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; (VII);
Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric
Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII);
Times Beach (09/28/88), MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO
(VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII);
Milltown-S, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
(VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII);
Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA
(IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA
(IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX);
Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent
Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*;
Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Taputimu Farm, AS (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); FMC
Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta,
OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner-IRM, WA
(X); Ponders Comer, WA (X)*; Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma, WA (X); South
Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)*
Surface Water
Auburn Road, NH (I); Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill (09/28/90), CT (I);
Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
484
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Surface Water (continued)
Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati &
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Sylvester, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field,
NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II);
Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS
Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty
Farm, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II);
Love Canal, NY (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Sharkey
Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III);
Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*;
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*;
Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fischer & Porter PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE
(III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lackawanna Refuse
Site, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (HI)*; Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer
Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA
(III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD Surface Water (III);
Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); US
Titanium, VA (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Gallaway
Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (VI); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Disposal, FL (IV)*; National Starch, NC (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL
(IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Whitehouse Waste
Oil Pits, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery,
MN (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak
Grove Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine,
OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V);
Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Arkwood,
AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bio-Ecology Systems, TX
(VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit,
TX (VI)*; Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill,
MO (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII);
California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Silver
Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor
Chemical, CA (IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits (06/25/87),
CA (IX)*; Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
485
-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS
Direct Contact
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I);
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (1); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field,
CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal
Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat
(06/29/90), NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum,
NY (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II); Claremont
Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Forest
Glen Subdivision, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge
Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker
Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals,
NJ (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY
(II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone
Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School,
NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery
(09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange
Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ
(II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington
Landfill, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand
Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical,
NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland
Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA
(III); Avtex Fibers (09/28/90), VA (III)*; Bendix, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Butz
Landfill, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm
Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA
(III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/28/89), PA (III)*; Hranica
Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA
(III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III);
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA
(III)*; New Castle Spill, DE (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
486
-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS
Direct Contact (continued)
Zinc, PA (HI)*; Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone,
MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump
(Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump #1 (09/28/90), PA (III)*; Walsh
Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works
(09/30/88), WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood
Preserving, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); City
Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products,
FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay
Facility, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery,
FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport
Landfill, FL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodeyco, NC (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem,
SC (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Anderson
Development, MI (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground,
OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN
(V)*; Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; Kysor
Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal,
MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service
Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V);
Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead
Smelt, IL (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V);
New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP); MN (V)*;
NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump
(06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*;
Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); Tri-State
Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply
(09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
487
-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS
Direct Contact (continued)
(VI)*; Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium
I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX
(VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX
(VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI);
Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits,
MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII);
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products,
CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th &
Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE),
UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant
(DOE), CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*;
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport
(09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando
Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 &
4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area,
CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ
(IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Frontier
Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);
Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
488
-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS
Public Exposure
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt
Fly Bog, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II);
Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal (10/26/87), NY (II)*; Ludlow
Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II);
Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing,
PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); West
Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,
NC (IV)*; National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
Sodeyco, NC (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Eau Claire
Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill,
MI (V); Miami County incinerator, OH (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation
and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL
(V); Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Deere, John,
Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek,
MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO
(VII)*; California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Coalinga
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); McColl, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area
1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX);
Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X)
REMEDY SELECTION
ARAR Waiver
Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*; Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH
(V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Silver
Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII)
Institutional Controls
Beacon Heights, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield
Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
489
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
Institutional Controls (continued)
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal
Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination,
NJ (II); Clothier Disposal, NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton
Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II);
Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); M&T DeLisa Landfill, NJ (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II);
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Olean Well Field,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); C&R Battery,
VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum,
PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III);
Industrial Lane, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord
Shope Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment),
WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III);
Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III);
Westline, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works
(09/30/88), WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL
(IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV);
Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination,
NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL
(IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road
Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); National Starch & Chemical, NC (IV)*; Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville
Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL
(IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Belvidere
Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL
(V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V);
IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
Morris Arsenic, MN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead
Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V);
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
490
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
Institutional Controls (continued)
(USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal Chemical,
TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood
Products; AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI);
Old Inger, LA (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; South Cavalcade Street,
TX (VI); South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX
(VI); Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County, KS
(VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deer, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO
(VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits,
MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver
Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII); Libby Ground Water (12/30/88), MT (VIII)*; Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Silver
Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas Asbestos
Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA (IX)*;
Intel (Santa Clara HI), CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos
Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division),
CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA
(X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide
and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma
Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Western Processing, WA (X)*
Interim Remedy
New Bedford, MA (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II);
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Myers
Property, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration,
NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*;
Fike Chemical, WV (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA
(III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III);
Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III);
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),
MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Cherokee
County/Galena, KS (VII); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Weldon Spring
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
491
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
Interim Remedy (continued)
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); California Gulch,
CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek (03/31/88), CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/11th & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th
& Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU22), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek,
MT (VIII); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1),
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); Silver
Mountain Mine, WA (X); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Gould, OR (X); Teledyne Wah Chang
Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
No Action Remedy
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beachwood/Berkeley Well, NJ (II); BEC Trucking, NY (II); Cooper Road,
NJ (II); Friedman Property, NJ (II); M&T DeLisa Landfill, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Pomona Oaks
Well Contamination, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Price Landfill
(09/29/86), NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Suffern Village Well
Field, NY (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal,
NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Vineland State School, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (HI); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III);
Middletown Road, MD (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Presque Isle, PA (III); Reeser's Landfill, PA
(III); Taylor Borough, PA (III)*; Voortman Farm, PA (III); Westline, PA (III)*; Westline
(Amendment), PA (III)*; Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); National Starch & Chemical, NC (IV)*; Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Varsol Spill,
FL (IV); Adrian Municipal Well Field, MN (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);
Morris Arsenic, MN (V); NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Peterson Sand & Gravel, IL
(V); Poer Farm, IN (V); Union Scrap Iron Metal, MN (V); Whitehall Municipal Wells, MI (V); Cecil
Lindsey, AR (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Homestake Mining, NM (VI);
Pagano Salvage, NM (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Stewco,
TX (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*; Big River Sand, KS (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (FAR-MAR-CO), NE (VII); John's Sludge Pond, KS (VII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU22), CO (VIII)*; Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)*
O & M
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire
(09/14/89), MA (I)*; Baird & McGuire (09/27/90), MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
492
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
O & M (continued)
Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well
Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT
(I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's
Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery
Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog (09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ
(II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater
Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill
North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ
(II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center
(09/28/90), NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, KY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd
Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY
(II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery
Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old
Bethpage, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Sarney
Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand
Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY
(II)*; Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Army Creek
Landfill, DE (III)*; Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon (09/29/86), PA (III)*; Butz Landfill, PA
(III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek (03/31/88), VA (III)*; Coker's
Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem (09/28/90), PA (HI)*;
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Fike
Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III);
Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (HI); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Limestone Road, MD (III); Lord Shope
Landfill, PA (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA
(III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal
Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire,
VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tybouts Corner Landfill, DE (III); Tyson's
Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA
(III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV (III)*;
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
493
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
O & M (continued)
62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV);
Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL
(IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery Disposal, FL (TV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch,
NC (IV); National Starch & Chemical, NC (IV)*; Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC
(IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV);
Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC
(IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold
Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse
Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI
(V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH
(V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D
Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V);
Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V);
Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire
Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC
Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V);
Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial,
MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Marion/Bragg
Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V);
Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); National Presto Industries,
WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump
(06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly
Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI
(V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of
Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
494
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
O & M (continued)
Water Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump,
MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*;
Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM
(VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX
(VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK
(VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste
Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South
Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I (03/18/88), TX
(VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI);
Passes Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR
(VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX
(VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); Texarkana
Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX
(VI); United Creosoting (09/29/89), TX (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA
(VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);
Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA
(VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO
(VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill,
MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric
Works, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm,
IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII);
California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/11th & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water (12/30/88), MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta,
Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln
Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sharon Steel
(Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union
Pacific, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials,
CA (IX); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA (IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt.
View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine,
CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
(IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX);
Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA
(IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
495
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
O & M (continued)
Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow,
CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX);
Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X);
Ponders Corner-IRM, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A,
WA (X)*; Toftdahl Drum, WA (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
ROD Amendment
Picillo Farm (Amendment), RI (I); Tinkharns Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (HI); Westline (Amendment),
PA (III)*; Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV
(III); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Rose Township (Amendment), MI (V);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Woodbury Chemical (Amendment), CO (VIII); Operating
Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Ponders Corner/Lakewood (Amendment), WA (X);
Western processing (Amendment), WA (X)
WATER SUPPLY
Alternate Water Supply
Auburn Road, NH (I): Charles George, MA (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I)*; Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II);
Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland
Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Well Field, NY (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ
(II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing,
NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II);
Vega Alta, PR (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Industrial Lane, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Acme
Solvents, IL (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Byron Salvage, IL
(V)*; Byron Salvage (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire
Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Kummer Landfill, MN (V); Lake
Sandy Jo, IN (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); National Presto
Industries, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Water Supply
System, MN (V)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); South Andover, MN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI
(V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI);
Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);
Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA
(VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water (12/30/88),
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
496
-------
WATER SUPPLY
Alternate Water Supply (continued)
MT (VIII)*; Milltown, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X)
Drinking Water Contaminants
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage
Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendmment), NH (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski
Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (06/20/90), NY (II)*; Brewster
Well Field, NY (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*; Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Combe Fill South
Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY
(II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Well Field (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township,
NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough Well Field, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;
Williams Property, NJ (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III);
Cryo-Chem (09/28/90), PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*;
Industrial Lane, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; Middletown Airfield,
PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Walsh Landfill,
PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
(IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Harris/Palm Bay
Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV);
National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood
Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Byron Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Clare Water
Supply, MI (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Fisher Calo
Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill,
OH (V); Industrial Excess Landfill (07/17/89), OH (V)*; K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary
Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V);
Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New
Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
497
-------
WATER SUPPLY
Drinking Water Contaminants (continued)
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN
(V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI
(V)*; Tower Chemical, FL (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota,
MN (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL
(V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX
(VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II (03/18/88), TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88),
TX (VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*;
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee
County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Vogel
Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service,
MO (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway
20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Smuggler
Mountain, CO (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ
(IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX);
San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4)*, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport,
AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X)
Floodplain
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*;
Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II);
Clothier Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ
(II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kentucky
Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Vestal
Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler
Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (HI); Bruin
Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover
Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA
(III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Tyson
Dump #1, PA (III)*; US Titanium, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88), DE (III)*; American
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
498
-------
WATER SUPPLY
Floodplain (continued)
Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (01/05/89), FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill,
FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); A&F Materials, IL (V); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V);
Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Ionia
City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Laskin/Poplar
Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Miami County Incinerator,
OH (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN
(V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87), LA
(VI)*; Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries,
TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Gurley Pit (09/26/88), AR (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Highlands Acid Pit (06/26/87), TX (VI)*; Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX
(VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI);
Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Deere, John,
Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII);
Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO
(VII)*; White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver
Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials,
CA (IX); East Helena, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX);
Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); San
Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos
Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
Sole-Source Aquifer
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ
(II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Biscayne Aquifer
Sites, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Master
Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue,
NE (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Purity Oil Sales,
CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson
(Stewart Division), CA (IX); Northside Landfill, WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
499
-------
WATER SUPPLY
Wetlands
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I);
Industri-plex, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); New Bedford, MA (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Stamina Mills,
RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89), NJ (II)*; Bridgeport, NJ
(II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical
Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,
NY (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); PAS
Oswego, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ
(II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*;
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland
Township Route 532, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Avtex
Fibers, VA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek
(03/31/88), VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III); L.A. Clarke &
Son, VA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Sand Gravel
& Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Westline, PA
(III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works (09/30/88), WV
(III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill (11/28/88), DE
(III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger
(C&M Oil), SC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV);
Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service
Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*;
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical
(09/29/90), MI (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park)
(09/28/90), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*;
Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Gurley Pit,
AR (VI); Homestake Mining, NM (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI);
Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT
(VIII); Rocky Hats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); South Bay Asbestos Area,
CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89),
WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
500
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Hybrid/Alternate Closure
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); C&R Battery, VA (III); Kane &
Lombard, MD (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Johns-Mansville, IL (V) Oconomowoc Electroplating,
WI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X)
ARARs (Used as a keyword from FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Laurel
Park, CT (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*;
Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Asbestos Dump,
NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);
GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY; Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Love
Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Rocky Hill, NJ (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II)*; Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III);
Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III):
Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds,
VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (HI); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Westline, PA
(III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat
Landfill, DE (III); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil),
SC (IV): Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Palmetto
Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sodeyco,
NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Zellwood,
FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Eau
Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; LaSalle
Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN
(V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*;
NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN
(V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex,
MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),
NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
501
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
ARARs (Used as a keyword from FY 1982 - 1988 only) (continued)
Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French
Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood Products, AR
(VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Petro-Chemical System, TX (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sol
Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South
Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City
Dump, KS (VII); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII);
Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE
(VII)*; Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*;
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times
Beach, MO (VII)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property,
CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Indian
Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes,
CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX);Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating
Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA
(IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits,
CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfills, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X)
Clean Air Act
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill &
Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank
Lines, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well
Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton
Terminals, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Radium
Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset
Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Woodland
Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
(III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base,
DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Keystone
Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
502
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Clean Air Act (continued)
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Raymark, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Airco,
KY (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese/Shelby
Fibers, NC (IV)*; City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV);
Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps
Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Big D
Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City
Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*;
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V)*; Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour,
IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S.
Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wausau Water Supply,
WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit,
AR (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI);
United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
(VII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway
20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek,
MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX): Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/28/90), CA (IX)*; Intersil, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales,
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos
Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area (09/29/89), CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Gould, OR
(X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Tcledyne Wah Chang Albany
(TWCA), OR (X)
Clean Water Act
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical,
NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill &
Resource Recovery, RI (I); ; Laurel Park, CT (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA
(I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply,
NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat
(06/29/90), NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field,
NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue W^'field,
NY (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Marathon Battery
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
503
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Clean Water Act (continued)
(09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II);
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); South
Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Woodland Township Route
72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE
(III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Butz
Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike
Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*; Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown
PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill,
PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III);
Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD
(III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*;
West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV);
Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries,
FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV);
Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump,
TN (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold,
MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road,
SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Allied/Ironton
Coke, OH (V)*; Anderson Development, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V);
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Ionia City
Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical
Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Master Disposal Service
Landfill, WI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine,
OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose
Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V);
Summit National, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical,
IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel,
IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI);
Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX
(VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
504
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Clean Water Act (continued)
(VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO
(VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Vogel Paint &
Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
(VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East
Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Operating
Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
Landfill (Amendment) (09/28/90), CA (IX)*; Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid
Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X);
Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside Landfill, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang
Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
Water Quality Criteria
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*; Chemical
Control, NJ (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Katonah Municipal
Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*;
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Preferred Plating, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Solvent Savers,
NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination,
PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson Road, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA
(III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*;
Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving,
NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman
Evans, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill
(Amendment), FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL
(IV)*; Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville
Road Landfill, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI
(V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;
Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); New
Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI
(V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S.
Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
505
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Water Quality Criteria (continued)
Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control,
AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
(VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII);
Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Silver Bow
Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos
Mine, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX) Ordot Landfill, GU
(IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside
Landfill, WA (X)
RCRA
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Baird & McGuire (09/27/90), MA (I)*;
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); New
Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old
Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams
Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II);
Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); GE
Wiring Devices, PR (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*;
Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88),
NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; PAS Oswego, NY
(II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Radium
Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Scientific
Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); South Brunswick
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532,
NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers,
VA (III)*; Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA
(III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III);
Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air Force Base, DE (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson
Road (06/30/88), PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Publicker/Cuyahoga
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
506
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
RCRA (continued)
Wrecking, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds,
VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV); Amnicola
Dump, TN (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL
(IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Newport Dump
Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV);
Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold
Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood,
FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH
(V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill,
OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross
Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill,
WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN
(V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI
(V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating,
MI (V); Northernaire Plating (09/29/89), MI (V)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating,
WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine, OH '(V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab
Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; St. Louis River,
MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of
Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste
Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI);
Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX
(VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn
(03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker
AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA
(VII)*; Arkansas City Dump,KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);
Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
507
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
RCRA (continued)
Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*;
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence
Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT
(VIII); Central City/Gear Creek, CO (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant
(DOE), CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*;
Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA
(IX); Fairchild Semicond (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara HI), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H.
Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport
(09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Operating Industries
(11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA
(IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX);
Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX) Commencement Bay/Nearshore,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X)*; Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA
(X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific
Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*
Closure Requirements
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI
(I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport,
NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue
Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand
& Gravel, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vineland Chemical,
NJ (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Enterprise
Avenue, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III);
M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Tyson's
Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*;
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment),
NC (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);
Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL
(V); Rose Township, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand
& Gravel, IL (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
508
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Closure Requirements (continued)
(VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Martin Marietta,
Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure
Treating, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); South Tacoma,
WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Clean Closure
American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (ID; King of Prussia, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); C&R
Battery, VA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
Vertac, AR (VI); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X)
Landfill Closure
Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Dover Air Force Base,
DE (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works
Disposal (Amendment), WV (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III);
US Titanium, VA (III); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL
(IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Bower's Landfill, OH (V); E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN
(V); Summit National, OH (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Operating Industries Landfill
(Amendment), CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X)
Safe Drinking Water Act
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I);
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I);
Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
509
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Safe Drinking Water Act (continued)
ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South
Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon,
CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field,
NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90),
NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hooker-102nd
Street, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ
(II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II);
Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vestal
Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Williams Property,
NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA
(III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope
Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA
(III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Voortman Farm, PA (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV);
Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries,
FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);
Flowood, MS (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV);
Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); National Starch, NC (IV);
Newsorne Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido
Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL
(IV); Zellwood, FL
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Safe Drinking Water Act (continued)
Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL
(V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL
(V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil IN (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste
Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*;
South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM
(VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big River
Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII);
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax,
IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII);
Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East Helena, MT
(VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery
Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*;
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Silver Bow Creek,
MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S
San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View),
CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes,
CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento
Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1)
(06/30/89), CA (IX)*; San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA
(IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside
Landfill, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X)
MCLs
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I);
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste
Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA
(I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
511
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
MCLs (continued)
NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90),
NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm,
NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY
(II)*; Metal tec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II);
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY
(II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump,
NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA (III); Craig
Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem (09/28/90),
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA
(III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone,
MD (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Walsh Landfill, PA (III); 62nd Street
Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV);
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL
(IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);
Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL
(FV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal
(03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff
Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL
(IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors
Nobel, MI (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling
Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI
(V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL
(V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant,
MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*;
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI
(V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Rose Township, MI
(V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V);
Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*;
Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM
(VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
512
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
MCLs (continued)
Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade
Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX
(VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS
(VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly
Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Hats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO
(VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel
(Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX);
MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA
(IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX)*;
San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service,
CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside Landfill, WA (X); Silver
Mountain Mine, WA (X)
MCLGs
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Kentucky Avenue
Wellfield, NY (II)*; Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (09/29/89), PA (III)*;
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III);
Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products,
FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Bofors Nobel, MI
(V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Springfield Township
Dump, MI (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V);
Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Martin Marietta, Denver
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
513
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
MCLGs (continued)
Aerospace, CO (VIII); Rocky Rats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Solvent Service, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX)
State Standards/Regulations/Guidance
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I);
Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); New Bedford, MA (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard,
ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH
(I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); American
Thermostat (06/29/90), NY (II)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy,
NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;
Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II);
Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau,
NY (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II)*; Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins
Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Katonah
Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield
(09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88),
NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery
(09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II);
Old Bethpage, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY
(II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II);
Ringwood Mines/Land fill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ
(II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II);
Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA (HI); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA
(III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Avtex Fibers (09/28/90), VA (III)*; Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Butz Landfill, PA
(III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; East Mt.
Zion, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
514
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
State Standards/Regulations/Guidance (continued)
(III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; New Castle, DE (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton
Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*;
Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA
(III)*; Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US Titanium, VA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Alpha Chemical,
FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,
NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV);
Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road
Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL
(IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA
(IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV);
Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Auto Ion Chemicals (09/27/89), MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors
Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Clare Water Supply, MI (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville
Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V);
Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI
(V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V);
National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; NL Industries/Taracorp Lead
Smelt, IL (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental
Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V)*;
Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Sangamo/Crab
Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill,
MI (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V);
Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Waite Park Wells,
MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining,
NM (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX
(VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83,
NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII);
Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
515
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
State Standards/Regulations/Guidance (continued)
Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville Site Area,
MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East
Industrial Park), NE (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII);
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits,MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times
Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly
Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*;
Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings
(DOE), UT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY
(VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky
Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23),
CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon
Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond
(S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View),
CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport
(09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries
(11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill
(Amendment), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA
(IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA
(IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA
(IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic
Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA
(X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Silver
Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Teledyne Wah Chang Albany
(TWCA), OR (X)
Drinking Water Standards (FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); GE Moreau, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Reich Farm,
NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Old Inger, LA (IV); Tri-City
Conservation, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute,
IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
516
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Drinking Water Standards (FY 1982 - 1988 only) (continued)
NM (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM
(VI); South ValIey/PL-83, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Milltown, MT (VIII); Indian Bend
Wash, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); United Chrome, OR (X)
Toxic Substances Control Act
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I);
Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Wells G&H, MA (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ
(II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II);
Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ
(II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles,
PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Disposal, FL (IV)*; Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV);
Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Conservation and
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fields Brook, OH (V); Fisher
Calo Chem, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*;
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI Control
Act (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V);
Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); North Calvacade Street,
TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street,
TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John,
Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits
(USDOE), MO (VII)*; Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX);
South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(07/05/88), WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X)
Public Health Advisory
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Myers Property, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Norwood
PCBs, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II);
Goose Farm, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Ambler
Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III);
Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Fike Chemical,
WV (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
517
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Public Health Advisory (continued)
New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oconomowoc
Electroplating, Wl (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V);
State Permit
Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII);
Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); IBM (San
Jose), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X)
TESTING/PILOT STUDIES
Leachability Tests
Iron Horse Park, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*;
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*;
Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
(II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); C&R Battery, VA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL
(IV); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of
Minnesota, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Rogers
Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX
(VI)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric
Works, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); East Helena,
MT (VIII); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
Treatabiliry Studies
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I);
New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R.
Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ
(II)*; GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ
(II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property,
NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY
(II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II);
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532,
NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Bendix, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson
Road, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA
(III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
518
-------
TESTING/PILOT STUDIES
Treatability Studies (continued)
Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc (06/29/88), PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA,
(III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway
Six, NC (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works (01/05/89), FL (IV);
Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving
(Amendment), FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL
(IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Sodyeco,
NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV);
Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
(V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); K&L Landfill, MI
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora
Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield
Township Dump, MI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX
(VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa
Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn
(09/23/88), TX (VI)*; Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern
(Somers), MT (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18),
CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Santa
Clara III), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); San Gabriel
Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson
(Stewart Division), CA (IX); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X)
TECHNOLOGY
Aeration
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); McKin, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes,
NH (I); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Bendix, PA (III); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV);
Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*;
Triangle Chem., TX (VI); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area
1), CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
519
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Air Monitoring
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*;
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog
Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Fulton Terminals,
NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II)*; Imperial Oil/Champion
Chemicals, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange
Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; North Sea Municipal Landfill,
NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Woodland
Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
(III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Airco, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Howe Valley Landfill,
KY (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V);
Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal,
WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving,
TX (VI); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid State
Circuits, MO (VII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*;
Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX),
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
Raytheon, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X);
Gould, OR (X)
Air Stripping
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Industri-plex,
MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II);
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)»;
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Endicott Village Well
Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)»;
King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Lang Property, NJ (II); Mannheim Avenue
Dump, NJ (II); Metal tec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Solvent Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
520
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Air Stripping (continued)
PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township
Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA
(III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (HI)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*;
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III);
Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (09/30/88), PA (III)*;
Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY
(IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); SCRDI
Bluff Road, SC (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI
(V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V);
Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V);
Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Well Field, IN (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN
(V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating,
WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V); Seymour (09/25/87), IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI
(V)*; University of Minnesota, MN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MA (V); Verona
Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water
Supply (09/29/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg.
3001), OK (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint &
Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO
(VII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Applied Materials,
CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM
(San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales,
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Ponders Corner-IRM,
WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma, WA (X);
South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*
Biodegradation/Land Application
Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Renora Inc. NJ. (II); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL
(IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL (V); Cliff/Dow Dump,
MI (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Atchinson/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); North Cavalcade,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
521
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Biodegradation/Land Application (continued)
TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal
Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
Capping
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights, CT (I); Charles George, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill,
NH (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Nyanza Chemical,
MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);
Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I);
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Burnt Fly
Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South
Landfill, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE
Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88),
NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair
Refinery, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Ambler
Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (09/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum,
PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); East Mt.
Zion, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*;
Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Matthews Electroplating, VA (III);
McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA
(III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA
(III); US Titanium, VA (III); Wade, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance
Works, WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); A. L.
Taylor, KY (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal
Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest
Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI
(V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor
Industrial, MI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, MI
(V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill,
MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State
Disposal, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
522
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Capping (continued)
IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom
Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems Site,
TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX, (VI); Gurley Pit, AR, (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR
(VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*;
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern Slates Portland Cement, IA (VII); Wheeling
Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE),
UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO
(VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Selma
Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Watkins
Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A,
WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Carbon Adsorption (GAC)
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & Beacon Heights, CT (I); Coakley
Landfill, NH (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I)*; McGuire, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield
Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
Stamina Mills, RI (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek
Farm, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Ground water Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II);
Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Metal tec/Aerosy stems, NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Myers
Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
(II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Solvent
Savers, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Bendix, PA
(III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III); Cryo-Chem (09/28/90), PA (III)*;
Kimberton, PA (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Osborne Landfill,
PA (HI); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
523
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Carbon Adsorption (GAC) (continued)
B.F., KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Wamchem, SC (IV); Anderson
Development, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI
(V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI
(V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee
Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Interim Water Treatment, MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;
New Lyme, OH (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Outboard
Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar &
Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*;
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tenth
Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE
(VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA
(IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield
Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA
(IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 &
4), CA (IX)*; Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Northside
Landfill, WA (X)
Decontamination
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II) Ewan Property, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ
(II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Avtex Fibers, VA
(III)*; Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (HI); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers
Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
524
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Dredging
Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); New Bedford, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's
Ledge, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hudson River, NY
(II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon
Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Anderson
Development, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Outboard
Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI);
Tar Creek, OK (VI); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X)
Excavation
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights
Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley
Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Hocomonco Pond,
MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza
Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve,
MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant),
MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm (03/31/89), NJ
(II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog
(09/29/88), NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/28/89),
NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Imperial
Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property,
NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace
Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II);
Montclair/West Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II);
Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II);
Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II);
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams Property, NJ
(II); York Oil, NY (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ
(II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Avtex Fibers (09/28/90), VA (III)*; Berks Sand
Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (HI); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force Base, DE (HI); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical,
PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA
(III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road (06/30/88), PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III);
Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*;
Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates,
PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (HI); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA
(III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); US Titanium, VA (HI);
Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
525
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Excavation (continued)
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American
Creosote Works (09/28/89), FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans
Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Dubose
Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV);
Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Miami Drum Services, FL (IV);
Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood
Dump, TN (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Sapp
Battery, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow
Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL
(IV); A&F Materials-HDD, IL (V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson
Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL (V); Cemetery
Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Cross
Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI
(V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil,
WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire,
MI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard
Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel
Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*;
Schmaltz Dump, WI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River,
MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa
Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca (03/31/87), LA (VI)*; Bayou
Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Geneva
Industries, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Jacksonville
Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX(VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI);
Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);
Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade
Street, TX (VI); Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI);
United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Creosoting (09/29/89), TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA
(VII)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal
Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings
Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII);
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri
Electric Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach,
MO (VII); Times Beach (09/28/88), MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Weldon Spring
Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
526
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Excavation (continued)
(Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Sapce, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin
Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Ogden Defense
Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT
(VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works,
CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine
(09/28/90), CA (IX)*; Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose),
CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); McCoIl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA
(IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87),
WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide
and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Silver Mountain
Mine, WA (X); South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Teledyne Wah
Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Filling
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Iron Horse Park, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III)*; Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA
(III); Wade, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Coleman Evans, FL (FV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*;
Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve
Reber, LA (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI);
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Midwest Manufacturing/North
Farm, IA (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII), Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*;
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X)
Ground Water Monitoring
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex,
MA (I); Kearsarge
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
527
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Monitoring (continued)
Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I);
Kellogg-Deering Well Field (09/29/89), CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park,
CT (I); McKin, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I);Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes,
NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit,
MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI
(I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); BEC Trucking, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking (09/28/89), NJ (II)*;
Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Endicott
Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA
Technical Center, NJ (II); Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY
(II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Higgins Farm, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde
Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kentucky
Avenue Well Field (09/28/90), NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ
(II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems
(09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township, NY (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); PAS Oswego,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Pomona Oaks Well Contamination, NJ; Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Ringwood Mines/Land fill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ
(II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ
(II)*; Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II);
Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Vineland State School, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ
(II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Army Creek Landfill (06/29/90), DE (III)*; Avtex
Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA
(III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Chisman Creek,
VA (III); Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Croydon TCE Spill,
PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel,
DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Henderson Road,
PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Limestone
Road, MD (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing, PA (III)*; New Castle Spill, DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment),
WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Reeser's Landfill,
PA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Taylor Borough,
PA (III)*; Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III);
Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; Voortman Farm, PA (III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Westline, PA (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
528
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Monitoring (continued)
(III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN
(IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
(IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy,
AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds,
TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg Dump, TN (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL
(PvO; National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood
Dump, TN (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL
(IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Smith's Farm,
KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*; Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Anderson Development, MI (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron Salvage, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage (06/30/89), IL (V)*; Clare
Water Supply, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI
(V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V);
Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill,
MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill (09/29/90), MN (V)*; Kysor
Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Long Prairie, MN (V);
Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill,
WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO
II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); National Presto Industries, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve
Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump (06/30/89), IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside
Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Novaco
Industries, MI (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska
Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical
(09/29/90), MI (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park),
MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Schmaltz
Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Summit
National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota,
MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN
(V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR
(VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX
(VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit (06/26/87), TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
529
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Monitoring (continued)
(VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Pagano
Salvage, NM (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services (09/28/90), TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX
(VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street,
NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI);
Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical,
MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville
Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO
(VII); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Ground water/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Northwestern States
Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel
Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service,
MO (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden
Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant
(DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*;
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU22), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific,
WY (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter,
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); Louisiana-Pacific, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*;
Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Gould, OR (X); FMC Yakima Pit,
WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X);
Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA
(X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)
Ground Water Treatment
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*;
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA
(I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; McKin, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
530
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Treatment (continued)
Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Sylvester, NH (I); Sylvester-S, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),
NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog
Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson
Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Combe Fill South Landfill,
NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott
Village Well Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ
(II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (ID; GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street,
NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield,
NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim
Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*;
Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); PAS
Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky
Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syncon
Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II);
Vestal, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route
72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE
(III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
(III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lord
Shope Landfill, PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA
(III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US Titanium, VA
(III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV);
Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood
Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Harris/Palm
Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV);
Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC
(IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV);
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D
Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Clare Water Supply, MI
(V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Fisher Calo
Chem, IN (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL
(V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;
Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
531
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Treatment (continued)
Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;
LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Master Disposal
Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO II,
IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V);
New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Lyme,
OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (•¥)*; Novaco Industries, MI (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI
(V); Old Mill, OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V);
Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V);
Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical,
IL (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN
(V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply (09/28/89), WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil,
IN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical,
TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX
(VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX
(VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Texarkana Wood
Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des
Moines TCE, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO (VII); Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel
Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO
(VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Flats
Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO
(VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*;
Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant),
CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum,
CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon,
CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando
Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA
(IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart
Division), CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Fort Lewis
Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*;
United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
532
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Incineration/Thermal Destruction
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I);
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I);
New Bedford, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage
Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm (06/28/89), NJ (II)*;
Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center,
NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street,
NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love
Canal, NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney
Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II);
Swope Oil, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Delaware
Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III);
Drake Chemical (09/29/88), PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (HI)*;
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Westline, PA (III);
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC
(IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL
(IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Soydeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Acme
Solvents, IL (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH
(V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fields
Brook, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V);
LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)»; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (06/30/89), OH
(V)*; Metamora Landfill, MI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); St. Louis River, MN (V);
Summit National, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V);
Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Brio Refining, TX (VI);
Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*;
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,
TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI);
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri
Electric Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach,
MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII);
Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Operating
Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
533
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Leachate Collection/Treatment
Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill (09/28/90), CT (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4,
MA (I)*; Charles George, MA (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Picillo Farm,
RI (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill
(07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*;
Volney Landfill, NY (II); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA
(III)*; Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); US Titanium, VA (III); Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote Works, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Allied/Ironton
Coke, OH (V)*; Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal,
MI (V)*; Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
New Lyme, OH (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand
& Gravel, IL (V)*; Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Vogel Paint & Wax,
IA (VII); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Martin Marietta, OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X)
Levees
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); American Creosote Works, TN (IV);
Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Old Inger, LA (VI) Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Times Beach, MO
(VII)*; South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)
Offsite Discharge
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Tinkhams
Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Reich
Farm, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); York
Oil, NY (II); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson Road, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*;
US Titanium, VA (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape
Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); City Industries, FL (IV);
Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV);
Wamchem, SC (IV);Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC
Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hunts Disposal,
WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Long
Prairie, MN (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval
Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St.
Louis Park), MN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); Tri-State Plating, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
534
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Off site Discharge (continued)
(VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA
(VII); Findett, MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works,
MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE (VII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Applied Materials, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville,
CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ
(IX); Litchfield Airport (09/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87),
CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area
IX CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX);
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*;
Northside Landfill, WA (X)
Offsite Disposal
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Coakley
Landfill, NH (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I);
McKin-IRM, ME (I); McKin, ME (I)*; O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve,
MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); American Thermostat, NY
(II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*; D'Imperio Property, NJ (II);
Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical
Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Glen Ridge
Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY
(II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue
Dump, NJ (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery
(09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems (09/27/90), NJ (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West
Orange Radium (06/01/90), NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II);
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments,
NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II);
Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II);
Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*;
Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (HI);
Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III);
Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Dover Air Force Base, DE (III);
Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III);
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Hebelka Auto
Salvage Yard, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
535
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Offsite Disposal (continued)
Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM,
PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing
(06/29/90), PA (III)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Saltville
Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor
Borough, PA, (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Miami Drum
Services, FL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV);
Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);
SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Soydeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV);
A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda,
OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron
Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V);
Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*;
Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V);
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine
(Amendment), OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmaltz Dump,
WI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI);
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI);
Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX
(VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker
AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*;
Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII);
Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII);
Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kem-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Lindsay
Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine
Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); White Farm Equipment
Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Denver Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII);
Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th
& Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; East Helena, MT (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver
Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII);
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*;
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical (09/29/89), CO (VIII)*; Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Del
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
536
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Offsite Disposal (continued)
Norte CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA
(IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson
(Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(09/30/89), WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Teledyne Wah Chang
Albany (TWCA), OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing
(09/25/85), WA (X)*
Offsite Treatment
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
Laurel Park, CT (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster
Well Field, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical (09/28/90), NY (II)*;
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA
Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); Hooker
Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Mattiace
Petrochemicals, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II);
Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR
(II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*;
Bendix, PA (HI); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (HI); Fike Chemical (09/28/90), WV (III)*;
Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD
(III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda,
OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL
(V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V);
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Tri-State
Plating, IN (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Cimarron Mining, NM (VI);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO
(VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII);
Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*;
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X)
Onsite Containment
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Landfill &
Resource Recovery, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
537
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Containment (continued)
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim
Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical
Processing, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing,
PR (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE (III); Delaware
Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); East Mt. Zion,
PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Kane &
Lombard, MD (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA
(III); Walsh Landfill, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III);
62nd Street Dump, FL (rV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Lewisburg
Dump, TN (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); North Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road
Landfill, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH
(V)*; Bofors Nobel, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hagen
Farm, WI (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); Janesville Old Landfill, WI (V);
K&L Landfill, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI
(V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; St. Louis River, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Rogers Road Municipal
Landfill, AR (VI); South Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmonds Street, NM (VI)*; Tinker
AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas
City Dump, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville
Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial
Park), NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Northwestern States Portland
Cement, IA (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers),
MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII);
Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/28/90), CA (IX)*; J.H. Baxter, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; South
Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart
Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur,
ID (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
538
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Discharge
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; New
Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy,
NJ (II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;
Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kentucky
Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II);
Nascolite, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY
(II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE
(III)*; Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III)*; Cryo-Chem, PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Osborne
Landfill, PA (III); Raymark, PA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US
Titanium, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; 62nd
Street Dump, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Harris/Palm
Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Munisport Landfill, FL (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
(IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Janesville Ash Beds, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary
Landfill, MN (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora
Landfill, MI (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V);
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical
(St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V);
University of Minnesota, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium
I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn
(09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*;
Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO
(VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); White Farm Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace,
CO (VIII); Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Hats
Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU19), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM (San
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
539
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Discharge (continued)
Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX);
J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Fort Lewis
Logistic Center, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X)
Onsite Disposal
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm,
NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow
Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Henderson
Road, PA (III)*; Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); American
Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC
(IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Flowood,
MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV);
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal (03/30/90), FL (IV)*; North
Hollywood Dump, TN (IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI
Dixiana, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV);
Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V);
Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN
(V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); LaSalle
Electrical, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II,
IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL
(V)*; Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V);
United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wayne
Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI);
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Cimarron Mining, NM (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK
(VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems,
TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Tenth Street
Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*;
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
540
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Disposal (continued)
Vertac, AR (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE
(VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII);
Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sharon Steel
(Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Atlas
Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine (09/21/90), CA
(IX)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (09/30/89), WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Gould, OR (X);
Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Silver Mountain Mine, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)*
Onsite Treatment
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I)*; New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina
Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ
(II)*; Cinnaminson Groundwater Contamination, NJ (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Haviland Complex, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II);
Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*;
Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Marathon
Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II)*;
Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ
(II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich
Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY
(II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply
1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532,
NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Avtex
Fibers, VA (III); Avtex Fibers (09/28/90), VA (III)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III);
Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*;
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (HI); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Dover Air Force
Base, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lord Shope Landfill,
PA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
541
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Treatment (continued)
WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III);
Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc (09/29/90), PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand Gravel & Stone, MD (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Tyson Dump #1, PA (III)*; US
Titanium, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*; 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American
Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC
(IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV);
City Industries, FL (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil
Products, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Harris/Palm Bay Facility, FL (IV); Hipps Road Landfill (Amendment), FL (IV); Howe Valley
Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery Disposal (03/30/90), FL (IV)*; Munisport Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV);
Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV);
Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek),
AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination
(Amendment), FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Anderson Development, MI (V); Belvidere
Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field,
WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*;
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Hedblum
Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Janesville Ash
Beds, WI (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities,
IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI
(V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*;
Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Moss-American
Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton
(TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill,
WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH
(V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*;
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*;
Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); United Scrap
Lead, OH (V); University of Minnesota, MN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply,
WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey
Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI);
French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX
(VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*;
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
542
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Treatment (continued)
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS
(VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant,
IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination
(East Industrial Park), NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Hastings
Groundwater, NE (VII); Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA
(VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm (09/27/90), IA (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII);
Northwestern States Portland Cement, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO
(VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); White Farm
Equipment Dump, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT
(VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin
Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII); Mystery Bridge at
Highway 20, WY (VIII); Ogden Defense Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Flats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky
Mountain Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial
(09/29/90), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose),
CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA
(IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ
(IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX);
Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating
Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1) (06/30/89), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure
Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow, CA (IX)*;
Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Colbert
Landfill, WA (X) FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Fort Lewis Logistic Center, WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and
Fur, ID (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X)
Plume Management
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Old Springfield Landfill (09/29/90), VT (I)*;
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, NJ (II);
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Company, NY
(II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*;
King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II);
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II);
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; Cryo-Chem,
PA (III)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*;
Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Price Landfill, NJ (III); Tyson Dump #1,
PA (III)*; Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); City Industries, FL 0V); Munisport Landfill, FL
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
543
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Plume Management (continued)
(IV); Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;
Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical (09/29/90), MI (V)*; Reilly Tar & Chemical (St.
Louis Park), MN (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona
Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V)*; Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*;
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Fairfield Coal
Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Waverly Groundwater
Contamination, NE (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT
(VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Mystery Bridge at Highway 20, WY (VIII); Rocky Hats
Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU19), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII);
Applied Materials, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Purity
Oil Sales, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX);
Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Tacoma,
WA (X)
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Kearsarge Metallurgical, NH (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Old
Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I);
GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well,
NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ
(II)*; Vega Alta, PR (II); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Tybouts Corner,
DE (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination, NC (IV); Cape Fear
Wood Preserving, NC (IV); City Industries, FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC
(IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Clare Water Supply, MI (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);
Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, MN (V); New
Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Reilly Tar &
Chemical (St. Louis Park), MN (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; University of
Minnesota, MN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cimarron Mining, NM
(VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88),
TX (VI); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII); Findett,
MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE
(VII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Del Norte, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA
(IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; San
Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
544
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Relocation
Forest Glen Subdivision, NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Brown's Battery Breaking, PA (III);
Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Waste Disposal Engineering, MN
(V); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI);
Times Beach, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII);
Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX)
Solvent Extraction
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*;
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*
Slurry Wall
Sylvester, NH (I); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lone
Pine Landfill, NJ (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Volney Landfill,
NY (II); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; Summit National,
OH (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU20), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU23), CO (VIII)*; Union Pacific, WY (VIII)
Soil Washing/Flushing
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; King of Prussia, NJ (II);
Myers Property, NJ (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); US Titanium, VA (III); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
Solidification/Stabilization
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; New Bedford, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (ID; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Roebling Steel, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin
Lagoon (09/29/86), PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Hebelka
Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); 62nd Street Dump, FL (IV);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
545
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics,
NC (IV); Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M
Oil), SC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV);
Pepper's Steel, FL (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL
(IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Yellow Water Road, FL (IV); Zellwood
Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation,
MI (V); Fields Brook, OH (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V);
MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Sangamo/Crab
Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA
(VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR
(VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR
(VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park),
NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII)*; Denver
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII); Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal (OU17), CO (VIII)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Frontier
Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Pacific Hide andFur, ID (X); Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Queen City Farms, WA (X); Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR
(X);
Surface Water Diversion/Collection
Charles George, MA (I)*; McKin, ME (I)*; Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek,
VA (HI)*; Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); East Mt. Zion, PA (III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III);
Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD
(III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA
(III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Taylor Borough, PA
(III); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Disposal, FL (IV)*; Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Mid-State
Disposal, WI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial
Waste Control, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; California
Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE), UT (VIII);
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X)
Surface Water Monitoring
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Saco
Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkhams Garage
(Amendment), NH (I); BEC Trucking, NY (II); Chemical Insecticide, N} (II); Clothier Disposal,NY
(II); FAA Technical Center, N] (II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II)*; Ludlow
Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II);
Sarney Farm, NY (II); Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II); Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
546
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Surface Water Monitoring (continued)
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III)*; Bally Groundwater Contamination,
PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); C&R Battery, VA (III); Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, DE
(III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); New Castle Spill, DE (HI); Palmerton Zinc, PA
(III)*; Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); North Hollywood Dump,
TN (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors Nobel, MI (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*;
Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Hunts Disposal, WI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;
Johns-Manville, IL (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Oconomowoc
Electroplating, WI (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Peterson Sand & Gravel, IL (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V)*; United Scrap Lead,
OH (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V);
Arkwood, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Sand
Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII);
Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Wheeling Disposal Service, MO (VII); Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE),
UT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX)*; J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Gould, OR (X)
Surface Water Treatment
C&R Battery, VA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing, PA (III)*; Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV); Anderson Development, MI (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI); East Helena, MT (VIII); Silver Bow Creek, MT (VIII)
Temporary Storage
New Bedford, MA (I); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);
Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals, NJ (II); Picatinny
Arsenal, NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA
(III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Rogers
Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII); Minker Stout/Stout, MO (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII);
Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE), MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium 12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Open Space Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 &
#3), UT (VIII); Rocky Hats Plant (DOE), CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*;
Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings), UT (VIII)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
547
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Treatment Technology
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire (09/14/89), MA (I)*; Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I);
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill, NH (I);
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kearsarge
Metallurgical, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); New Bedford, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment), NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well
Field (09/29/88), NY (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Ewan
Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property (09/29/89), NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); FAA Technical
Center (09/28/90), NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ
(II); Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY (II); Hooker-102nd Street, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ
(II); King of Prussia, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (07/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY
(II)*; Love Canal, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*;
Marathon Battery (09/29/89), NY (II)*; Mattiace Petrochemicals, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ
(II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Myers Property, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Radium Chemical, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Roebling Steel, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Sarney Farm, NY (II);
Sayreville Landfill, NJ (II); Sealand Restoration, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Syncon Resins, NJ
(II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Avtex Fibers (09/28/90), VA (III)*; Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);
Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; C&R Battery, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV
(III); Greenwood Chemical, VA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton (06/30/89), PA (III)*; L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); M.W.
Manufacturing, PA (III); M.W. Manufacturing (06/29/90), PA (III)*; Ordnance Works Disposal, WV
(III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (HI)*; Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; US
Titanium, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III);
62nd Street Dump, FL (IV); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); American Creosote Works,
TN (IV); American Creosote Works (01/05/89), FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood
Preserving, FL (IV); Cabot/Koppers, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV);
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving (Amendment), FL (IV); Dubose Oil Products, FL (IV); Geiger
(C&M Oil), SC (rV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling
Battery, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Disposal, FL (IV)*; Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Yellow Water
Road, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Zellwood Groundwater Contamination (Amendment), FL (IV);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Anderson Development, MI (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bofors
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
548
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Treatment Technology (continued)
Nobel, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Forest Waste, MI
(V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hagen Farm, WI (V); Ionia City
Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL
(V)*; Laskin/Poplar, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil (09/30/87), OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI
(V); Moss-American Kerr-McGee Oil, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oconomowoc Electroplating, WI (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V);
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment), OH (V);
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI), IL (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Springfield Township Dump, MI
(V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); University of
Minnesota, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises,
IN (V); Arkwood, AR (VI); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner
(Amendment), OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Jacksonville Municipal Landfill, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI); Motco (09/27/89), TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street,
TX (VI); Oil Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill, AR (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services,
TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds
Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (VI); Texarkana
Wood Preserving, TX (VI); Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX
(VI)*; Vertac, AR (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant, IA (VII);
Hastings Groundwater, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE
(VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO,
NE (VII)*; Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Missouri Electric Works, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables,
MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII);
Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); East Helena, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Martin
Marietta, Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Ogden Defense
Depot, UT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU17),
CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Sand
Creek Industrial (09/28/90), CO (VIII)*; Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt.
View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Intersil, CA (IX); J.H. Baxter, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX);
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries Landfill (Amendment), CA (IX)*;
Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel
Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Solvent Service, CA (IX);
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX);
Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); FMC Yakima Pit, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), OR (X); Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Chrome, OR
(X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
549
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Vacuum Extraction
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
(I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Stamina Mills, RI (I); Tinkhams Garage (Amendment),
NH (I); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Solvent Savers, NY (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Bendix, PA (III);
Lord Shope Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (IV); Fisher Calo Chem, IN (V); Hagen
Farm, WI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Pristine (Amendment),
OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*;
Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Hardage/Criner (Amendment), OK (VI);
South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek/Bldg. 3001), OK (VI); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (VII); Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (VII); Martin Marietta,
Denver Aerospace, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU18), CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial,
CO (VIII); Intersil, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Solvent
Service, CA (IX); Watkins Johnson (Stewart Division), CA (IX)
Venting
Beacon Heights, CT (I); Beacon Heights Landfill, CT (I); Charles George, MA (I)*; Coakley Landfill,
NH (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Kentucky
Avenue Wellfield, NY (II)*; Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Syosset Landfill, NY (II); East Mt.
Zion, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); Algoma Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH
(V)*; IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); K&L Landfill, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); Master Disposal Service Landfill, WI (V); Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; New Lyme,
OH (V); Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI (V); Wayne Waste Oil, IN (V); Wheeler Pit, WI (V);
Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI), Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X)
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San
Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX)
Vitrification
Anderson Development, MI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR
(USDOI), IL (V)*; Crystal Chemical, TX (VI); Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU16), CO (VIII)*;
Northwest Transformer, WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
550
-------
MISCELLANEOUS
Municipally-Owned Site
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); North Sea Municipal Landfill,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II);
Volney Landfill, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Newport
Dump Site, KY (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); New
Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Crystal City Airport,
TX (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); John's Sludge Pond, KS (VII); Denver Radium Site
Streets, CO (VIII), Ordot Landfill, GU (IX)
Woodlands (FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Tinkhams Garage, NH (I); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Old Inger, LA (VI)
HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT
ACL
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Sylvester, NH (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (09/30/88), NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III)*;
Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV);
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Western Processing,
WA (X)*
Background Levels
Coakley Landfill, NH (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West
Orange Radium, NJ (II); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Woodland Township Route 72, NJ (II);
Woodland Township Route 532, NJ (II); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III)*; East Mt. Zion, PA (III);
Hranica Landfill, PA (III); Industrial Lane, PA (III); Keystone Sanitation Landfill, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Raymark, PA (III); Sand,
Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV);
Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Schuylkill Metal, FL (IV);
Metamora Landfill, MI (V)*; Reilly Tar, MN (V); Springfield Township Dump, MI (V); United Scrap
Lead, OH (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM
(VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park), NE (VII);
Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Whitewood Creek, SD (VIII);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
551
-------
HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT
Deferred Decision
Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (09/30/85), NJ (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Scientific Chemical Processing, NJ (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's
Dump, PA (III); American Cresote, FL (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN (V)*; Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma
Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*
Initial Remedial Measure (IRM)
New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Intel (Santa Clara III), CA (IX)
Temporary Remedial Measure (FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Hudson River, NY (II); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (VI)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII); Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Union Pacific, WY (VIII)
Contingent Remedy
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Imperial Oil/Champion
Chemicals, NJ (II); Mannheim Avenue Dump, NJ (II); Myers Property, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY
(II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); City Industries, FL (IV); Howe Valley Landfill, KY (IV);
Jadco-Hughes, NC (IV); Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (II)*; Osborne Landfill, PA (III); NL
Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelt, IL (V); St. Louis River, MN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); East
Helena, MT (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
* U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1991. 5 » 8. 1 6 7 t o 5 S 3
552
------- -------
>
tn "2 •"
1 ™U
ill
ja
8
o
0.
3
I
U
Components of
Selected Remedy
( HI
1
I
OJ
ns
*
.0)
.Q
1
^
§
S
•& s
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Dati
Remedial Actk
c
o
'So
OJ
Btf
,
0 0
o o
0 0 «
°" °" S 'P
£ SJ H H
CO CO OJ C
5 S & i
irt _ ra
r>4 T3 j_.
« .c -S - o
e8 "S u -e Si -=
u — ^o > QJ &o
o f .£?!: ^ ^
^^ fol^
Itllll
JH ^ ^- ro ^J "C ,->
n= -° w S ^ w S
aj \ *3 02 ^' *"" —
f |gy fa S a
r* C CO CXi r-H d yl
o 5 ^
Excavation of soil followed by screening to
separate large contaminated materials and
stabilization fixation of a portion of the soi
using an immobilization technique; construi
of a bottom clay liner, where necessary; an
capping of the stabilized material along wit
any remaining contaminated materials; rem
of some GW monitoring wells; GW monitor
and deed and access restrictions. Onsite
consolidation will be implemented if pilot
testing finds treatment impracticable
\
§
IN
CO"
_c
'5
a
CO
_c
2
§
" «
:= S3
&£
•* £
CO "0
-S S
5 | § S
o Q H ;> E
S " 3 S .
a ts -a •> «
W 3 ^ ^
j_r
OJ
8 *
S >
•a o _.
§^ ^ 1
ft > 0 S
o
S
^
o
^ Gf O —
Ov 18 O ™
*"•§ ° e
" §" Sf e
g 3 g ^M
.,1
ie a
«Sa
•£ o ra
Ipi
l-o3"S
^502
l"§ u ^
1 e^^
QJ t f/5
u c ja n
dJ O QJ *•"*
^ El o
C ®^ i
Si ja 'i
Continued operation of H1-H2 treatment
system; installation of variable-frequency
controllers on well pump motors to reduce
energy requirements; changing of fan drive
treatment tower; installation of new monitc
wells, upgrading of existing wells, and
continued sampling and analysis of aquifer;
excavation and offsite disposal of septic tan
and drain field piping; and placement of
administrative restrictions on excavation of
and installation and usage of wells
"8
IS
1
VI
O
Z
ta
*Z
5 M
s C ^
° g-i
•g 1 -s S
18 ^ CA £X
u 8 > i
tf
u
! „
12 5J
u o
"O m
C < \ T3
o > O ft .E 18
i
u £
c ^
8J S
a5 2 S
0
442
|