United StatM
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
              Off ice of
              Drinking Water (WH-6501
              Washington, OC 20460
EPA 570/9-85-003
May 1986
vvEPA
              Water
Report to Congress
on injection
of Hazardous Waste
                                    THIRD PRINTING
                                    AUGUST 1985

-------
REPORT TO CONGRESS ON INJECTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
              Office of Drinking Water
      U. S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                 401 M Street, S.W.
              Washington, D.C.  20460
                       U.S. Envlronmer>tal Protection Agency
                       Haslco 5, L'V , _ ..- ; r.'L--> '}
                       220 S. Daurc^'.: :^".^t, ILeoin 167Q
                                 j.   fiOQO-i

-------
REPORT TO CONGRESS ON INJECTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE - ERRATA SHEET
As of 8/23/85


0 Page II-2 - Paragraph after bullets

     The number 193 should be 195.*


0 Page II-4 - Right-hand column of "Operating Status of Class I.."

    - The fourth set of numbers should be 2/2 instead of 4/3 (Califorr
    - The fifth set of numbers should be 2/2 instead of 1/1 (Colorado)
    - The eighteenth set of numbers should be 81/31 instead of 79/31  (


0 Page VI-18 - Third paragraph, second sentence

    - Five should replace four.


0 Section 1 of the attachments

    - Partial and total counts should be disregarded**


0 Section 6 of the attachments

    - Six wells that did not inject in 1983 were included:
      .  Wells OB5, 16, 17A and OB4 at the Hercofina facility in NC;
      .  Well 1 at the Cominco America Inc. facility in TX;
      .  Well 1 at the Monsanto Chemical Co., Chocolate Bajou facility
        in TX; and
      .  Well 1 at the Waste-water Inc. facility in TX.


0 Last attachment - "Location and Status of Class IV Wells"

   - The order of the first and second page is inverted.*
   - Inadvertently two Class IV wells were left out.  These two
     wells are located in California at the Cordova Chemical,
     Aerojet Propulsion Laboratory Facility.  They are CERCLA
     clean-up wells and authorized in the UIC regulations.
*  Corrected in prints after June 12, 1985
** Corrected in prints after July 15, 1985

-------
Foreword
     This report was prepared by the Office of Drinking Water
fron data gathered by the EPA Regional Offices and a contractor.
Analysis of the data and writing of the report was done by staff
of the Underground Injection Control Branch of the Office of
Drinking Water.  The texts of the. field reports were prepared by
the EPA Regional Offices after visits to the 20 sites and reviews
of State files.  The original Project Manager was Dr. Jentai
Yang who organized the effort and was responsible for the first
drafts of the document.  The project was completed by Mario
Salazar.

Acknowledgments

0  Data Gathering

   Peter Acker and Leon Lazarus - EPA Region II
   Charles Kleeman and Karen DeWald - EPA Region III
   John Mason and John Isbell - Region IV
   Kris Kamath and Mark Vend! - EPA Region V
   Ron Van Wyck, Desi Crouther, Clay Chesney and
   Erlece Allen - Region VI
   Ralph Langemeier and Bill Pedacino - EPA Region VTI
   Paul Osborne and Mike Strieby - EPA Region VIII
   Ron Clawson and Russell Mechem - EPA Region IX
   Harold Scott - EPA Region X
   John Mentz and Gladees Abdypoor - SMC Martin, Inc.

0  Data Analysis and Report Writing

   Mario Salazar, UICB, ODW (Project Manager)
   Jentai Yang, UICB, ODW (original Project Manager)
   Gabrielle Kardon, UIBC, ODW
   A. Roger Anzzolin, UICB, ODW
   Francoise Brasier, ODW
0  Reviewers

   A. Roger Anzzolin, UICB, ODW
   Chris Shilling, IO, ODW
   Kris Kamath, Recion V
   Jim Antizzo, OSWER
   Nancy Zeller, OSWER
   Joel Smith, OPPE
   Paul Baltay, SPD, ODW
   John B. Atcheson, UICB, ODW

0  Editing

   Harriet Hubbard, UICB, ODW
   Judy Long, UICB, ODW
   Lois Canada, OPBE, ODW

0  Typing

   Harriet Hubbard, UICB, ODW
   Cheryl Clark, UICB, ODW
   Lenora Dangerfield, UICB, ODW
 Dan Sullivan, UICB, ODW
 Pat Sullivan, Ball State U.
 Paul Osborne, Region VIII
 Ron Van Wyck, Region VI
 Ton Aalto, Region VI
 Desi Crouther, Region VI
 Donald Olson, OWEP
 Thomas- E. Belk, UICB, ODW
 Erik Olson, OGC
Judy Newton, WSB, ODW
Pat Blackwell, WSB, ODW

-------

-------
      Report to Congress on the Injection of Hazardous Waste


                        Table of Contents
                                                              Page

I.    Background - History .

      1.1  Introduction                                        1-1
      1.2  The Underground Injection Control
             (UIC) Program                                     1-1
      1.3  Hazardous Waste Well Assessment and
             Inventory                                         1-3
           1.3.1  Need for the Assessment & Inventory          1-3
           1.3.2  Methodology                                  1-5

II.   General Findings

      2.1  Introduction                                       II-l
      2.2  Well Operating Status                              II-l
      2.3  Volume Injected                                    II-2
      2.4  Well Classes                                       I1-2
      2.5  Type of Operation                                  II-6
      2.6  Geographic Distribution                            II-6
      2.7  Age of Wells                                       11-10
      2.8  Users of HW Wells                                  11-10
      2.9  Surface Facilities                                 11-14

III.  Hydrogeologic Environment

      3.1  Introduction                                      III-l
           3.1.1  Geohydrologic Considerations               III-l
           3.1.2  General Geology                            JII-1
      3.2  Regional Geological Findings                      III-l
      3.3  Local Geological Findings                         III-2
           3.3.1  Lithological                               II1-2
           3.3.2  Structural                                 II1-7
      3.4  Hydrology                                         II1-7
      3.5  Other Considerations                              111-13
           3.5.1  Formation Fluid Considerations
                    and Compatibility                        111-13
           3.5.2  Water Supply Wells                         111-16
           3.5.3  Wells in the Area of Review                111-16

-------
                                   -2-
 IV.   Well Construction and Evaluation

      4.1  Drilling Technology                                  IV-1
      4.2  Well Construction Techniques                         IV-1
           4.2.1  Bottom-Hole and Injection Completion          rv-1
           4.2.2  Casing/ Tubing and Packer                     IV-6
           4.2.3  Cementing                                     IV-12
      4.3  Corrosion Control                                    IV-14
      4.4  Mechancial Integrity of Injection Wells              IV-15
           4.4.1  Requirements                                  IV-15
           4.4.2  Findings                                      IV-16

 V.   Waste Characteristics

      5.1  Introduction                                         V-l
      5.2  Waste Classification                                 V-l
      5.3  Distribution of Waste Types                          V-2
      5.4  Concentration of Waste Stream Components             V-2
      5.5  Distribution by Waste Codes                          V-7
      5.6  Section 201(f) of the Hazardous and Solid Waste      V-7
             Amendments
      5.7  Section 201(g) of the HSW&         •                 V-9
      5.8  Off-Site Operations                                  V-9

VI.   Reoulatory Controls

      6.1  Introduction                                         VI-1
      6.2  Hazardous Waste Management Program                   VE-1
      6.3  Natural Pollutant Discharge Elimination
             System (NPDES)                                     VI-2
           6.3.1  Limitation of the NPDES Program               VI-2
           6.3.2  NPDES Permits                              "  VI-5
      6.4  The Underground Injection Control
             (UIC) Program   "                                   VI-6
           6.4.1  Requirements for Class I Hazardous
                    Waste Wells                                 VI-7
      6.5  UIC Permits                                          VI-8
           6.5.1  UIC Operation Requirerents                    VI-9
           6.5.2  Monitoring                           .         VI-12
           6.5.3  Reporti ng                                     VI-14
      6.6  Inspection and Surveillance                          VI-15
      6.7  Noncompliance and Enforcement —                     VI-17
      6.8  Financial Responsibility                             VI-21
      6.9  Class IV Wells                                       VI-28

APPENDICES

-------
                            List of Figures
Figure #                                                       Page
I   -   1   Location of Class I Hazardous Waste                 1-9
              Facilities
II  -   1   Operational Status of HW Wells                      II -    3
II  -   2   Active On-Site / Off-Site Wells                     II -    8
II  -   3   Distribution of Active Hazardous Waste              II -    9
              Injection Wells
II  -   4   Hazardous Waste Wells Built Per Year                II -   11
II  -   5   Industries Using HW Injection Wells                 II -   12
II  -   6   Surface Facilities at HW Injection Sites            II -   13
III -   1   Regional Geological Features in the U.S.            Ill-    3
III -   2   Injection Zone Lithologies                          III-    5
III -   3   Confining Zone Lithologies                          III-    6
III -   4   Average Depths: IZ, USDW, Separation                III-   12
III -   5   Wells in the Vicinity of Class I HW Wells           III-   19
IV  -   1   Conponents of a Rotary Drilling Operation           IV -    2
IV  -   2   Injection Well with Open Hole Completion            IV -    3
IV  -   3   Injection Well with Screened Bottom                 IV -    4
IV  -   4   Injection Well with Perforated Botton               IV -    5
IV  -   5   Well Completions                                    IV -    7
IV  -   6   Schematic Showing Well Construction Steps           IV -    8
IV  -   7   Well Construction Materials                         IV -   11
IV  -   8   Injection Well with Open Annulus Completion         IV -   13
IV  -   9   Schematic Diagram Showing Injection Well            TV -   17
              with Lack of Mechanical Integrity
V   -   1   Breakdown of the Undiluted Waste-Hazardous          V -    4
              and Non-Hazardous
V   -   2   Breakdown of the Non-Aqueous Hazardous Waste        V -    5
VI  -   1   Class I HW Injection Permits Issued              "   VI -    4
VI  -   2   Status of UIC Permits                               VI -   10
VI  -   3   Comparison of bottom hole pressures                 VI -   11
VI  -   4   Compliance and Enforcement                          VI -   19

-------
                             List of Tables
Table f                                                           Page

I  -  1  List of Class I Hazardous Waste Injection               I  •-  7
           Facilities Assessed
1-2  Representativeness of Assessed Facilities               I  - 10
1-3  Outline of Class I Hazardous Waste  Injection           I  - 12
           Facility Report
1-4  Hazardous Waste Injection Wells-Quality  of              1-13
           Data Collected
II -  1  Operating Status of Class I Hazardous Waste  Wells      II -  4
           Facilities in the U.S. (August  1984)
II -  2  Estimated Volume of Hazardous Waste                    II -  5
           Injection in the U.S. 1983
II -  3  Off-Site Wells and Facilities in  each State             II -  7
II -  4  Distribution by Industrial Category                    II - 15
III-  1  Injection Zone Characteristics                          III-  8
III-  2  Confining Zone Characteristics                          III- 10
III-  3  USDW in the Vicinity of Class I HW  Wells               III- 11
III-  4  Cannon Water Analyses Performed on                      III- 15
           Subsurface Water Samples
III-  5  Wells in the Vicinity of Class I  HW Wells               III- 17
IV -  1  Tests to be Considered During Construction              IV - 18
IV -  2  Acceptable Test to Prove Mechanical                    TV - 19
           Integrity Periodically
IV -  3  Applicability of tests That May Be  Used  For   •          IV - 20
           Mechancial Integrity Verification
IV -  4  MIT Performed in Facilities Visited                    TV - 22
V  -  1  Waste Characteristics of 108 HW Active HW               V  -  3
           Wells in the U.S. in 1983
V  -  2  Hazardous Waste Stream Conponents and                   V  -  6
           Concentration
V  -  3  Eleven Most Frequently Encountered  RCRA                 V  -  8
           Cedes
V  -  4  Facilities Injecting RCRA Cedes F001 to  F005           V  - 10
V  -  5  Wells Injecting Acids With pH less  than                 V  - 11
           2 J1983)
V  -  6  Calculated Annual Volume Injecting  into                 V  - 13
           Active Off-site Wells
VI -  1  Summary of State Permitting Programs                    VI -  3
VI -  2  EPA Implemented Program (DI-I) 5/11/84              -    VI -  7
VI -  3  Non-Conpliance Episodes at Off-site                    VT - 22
           Facilities
VI -  4  Non-Conpliance Episodes at Cn-site  Facilities          VI - 23

-------
                         EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IN^ODUCTION

    This report was prepared to meet the requirements of Section 701 of
the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.  This Section requires
that:

    "(a) The Administrator, in cooperation with the States, shall
    compile and, not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of
    the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, submit to the
    Committee on Environment and Public Works of the United States
    Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the United
    States House of Representatives an inventory of all wells in the
    United States which inject hazardous waste [hazardous wastes are
    designated as such under the provisions of 40 CFR Part 261 of the
    Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976] .  The inventory
    shall include the following information:

    "(1)  the location and depth of each well;

    "(2)  engineering and construction details of each well, including
          the thickness and composition of its casing, the width and
          content of the annulus, and pump pressure and capacity;

    "(3)  the hydrogeological characteristics of the overlying and
          underlying strata, as well as that into which the waste is
          injected;

    "(4)  the location and size of all drinking water aquifers penetrated
          by the well, or within a one-mile radius of the well or
          within 200 feet below the well injection point;

    "(5)  the location, capacity, and population served by each well
          providing drinking or irrigation water which is within a
          five-mile radius of the injection well;

    "(6)  the nature and volume of the waste during the one-year
          period immediately preceding the date of the report;

    "(7)  the dates and nature of the inspections of the injection well
          conducted by independent third parties or agents of State,
          Federal,  or local government;

-------
    "(8)  the name and address of all owners and operators of the well
          and any disposal facility associated with it;

    "(9)  the identification of all wells at which enforcement actions
          have been initiated under this Act (by reason of well failure,
          operator error, groundwater contamination, or for other
          reasons) and an identification of the wastes involved in such
          enforcement actions; and

    "(10) such other information as the Administrator may, at his
          discretion, deem necessary to define the scope and nature of
          hazardous waste disposal in the United States through underground
          injection.
    n
     (b) In fulfilling the requirements of paragraphs (3) through (5)
    of subsection (a), the Administrator need only submit such information
    as can be obtained fron currently existing State records and from
    site visits to at least 20 facilities containing wells which inject
    hazardous waste."

     The report summarizes the raw data and is organized, along the
following lines:

     *   A General information chapter contains information required by
         paragraphs 1, 8 and 10;

     0   A chapter on Engineering covers the construction of the wells
         and the information in paragraphs 2 and 6;

     0   The chapter on Hydrcgeolcgy covers paragraphs 3, 4 and 5;

     0   Information required by paragraph 6 is covered  under Waste
         Characteristics; and

     0   A chapter on Regulatory Controls covers paragraohs 7-and 9.

     The raw data containing the information requested in paragraphs 1
through 10 of Section 701(a) is attached as an appendix.  Field reports
fron the 20 facilities visited are available and may be  obtained bv
contacting the Project Manager, Mr. Mario Salazar, in the Office of
Drinking Water, U.S. EPA, or through the appropriate Regional office.
A list of these facilities appears in Chapter I.
                            -2-

-------
BACKGROUND

    Disposal of waste by underground injection started in the oil
fields in the thirties as an alternative to surface disposal of produced
brines.  Disposal of industrial wastes in injection wells started in
the fifties.  It was considered a method to isolate wastes  (that could
not be easily treated) from the accessible environment by placing them
into deep formations where they would remain for geologic time.

    The practice was premised on simple hydrogeologic principles.  In
several areas of the United States, the basement rock is covered by up
to 20,000 feet of sedimentary rocks, which have been deposited over
millions of years and have remained relatively undisturbed.  These
rocks are stratified, and the many layers vary with regard  to composition,
structure, permeability, and porosity both vertically and laterally.
They also contain water whose composition changes with depth.  Generally,
the concentration of total dissolved solids (TDS), increases with
depth.  Usually water is considered potable when it contains less than
500 mg/1 TDS, while the upper limit for irrigation and stock watering
is 2,500 to 3,000 mg/1 TDS.  (EPA protects water with a TDS content of
10,000 mg/1 or less since there is evidence that this water can be used
as a potable source after treatment.) By way of comparison, brines
associated with oil and gas production generally contain 30,000 to
100,000 mg/1 TDS, and seawater generally contains 35,000 mg/1 TDS.  The
fact that there are these large differences between the composition of
surficial and deep water indicates that the various impermeable strata
act as barriers to the upward movement of the deep saline water.  It is
sedimentary rocks with sufficient permeability, thickness, depth and
areal extent which best serve as injection zones.  The location of such
thick sedimentary sequences (in the Gulf Coast and Michigan Basin, for
instance) is one of the factors controlling where deep well injection can
occur.

    The engineering of injection wells was based on oil-field technology
and was developed further by major companies to dispose of their specific
waste streams.  A typical injection well is several thousand feet deep
and injects wastes into highly saline permeable injection zones.  The
well consists of concentric pipes (figure 1).  The cuter pipe or surface
casing usually extends below the base of usable water and is cemented
back to the surface.  Two pipes extend to the injection zone, the long
string casing which is also usually cemented back to the surface, and
within it the injection tubing.  It is through the tubing and perforations
at the bottom of the long-string casing that waste is injected.  The
space between the tubing and the casing (called the annulus) is closed
off at the bottom by a device called a packer, which keeps injected
                                -3-

-------

-------
 400
 Feet"
  800-
 1200-
 1600-
2000-
2400-
2800-
3200-
3600-
4000-
4400-
           Ideal Injection Well and  Site
                 GAUGE ON INJECTION TUBING

                             WELLHEAD
          GAUGE ON TUBING-CASING ANNULUS
          Water Table
                        SURF ACE CASING-4;
               ANNULUS (POSITIVE PRESSURE)-
                            CEMENT •
                        INJECTION TUBING
                             PACKER-
                        PERFORATIONS
Surficiai Aquifer (USDVV)
                                                   Confined Aquifer (USDW)
Saline Aquifer
>10,000 TDS
Saline Aquifer
< 30. 000 TDS
                                                    Confining Zone
                                                    Injection Zone
                                                    > 30,000 TDS
                                 Figure 1
                                   -3 A-

-------
fluids from backing up into the annulus.  This annular space is
typically filled with an inert, pressurized fluid.  The inert fluid
is kept at a higher pressure than the injection pressure in the
tubing to prevent escape of the waste into the annulus if a leak
should occur.  Capping the well is the wellhead, which contains
valves and gauges to control and monitor injection.

    The practice of underground injection came under Federal control
in 1974 when the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) was enacted.  In
order to ensure the protection of the Nation's underground sources
of drinking water (USDWs) fron improper injection of fluids, Congress
established the Underground Injection Control (UIC) program in Part
C of the Act.  The law required that the Agency set minimum standards
and technical requirements which the States were to adopt in order
to assume primary enforcement responsibility (primacy).  The salient
points of the regulations adopted in 1980 are as follows:

    0 They define underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) as
      all aquifers containing water with less than 10,000 mq/1 TDS.

    0 They categorize injection wells into five classes.  Class I
      wells inject hazardous and non-hazardous waste below the
      deepest USDW.  Class II wells are used in conjunction with
      oil and gas production and include the vast majority of
      injection wells.  Class III wells are used for the extraction
      of minerals in solution mining operations.  Class IV wells
      inject hazardous wastes into or above USDWs and are banned.
      Class V wells are nonhazardous waste injection wells that do
      not fit into the other four classifications.  Class I hazardous
      waste wells are the focus of this study.

    0 They adopt the definition of hazardous waste pronulgated in
      40 CFR Part 261, pursuant to the requirements of the Resource
      Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA).

    8 They establish minimum technical requirements designed to
      ensure that the waste will be  injected in the proper horizon
      and remain there.

These requirements include:

            - siting  (in areas free  of faults, with adequate
              confining zones);

            - construction  (requirements for casings, tubing and
              packer, cementing, logging and testing);
                            -4-

-------
        - operation (fracturing of the injection zone is prohibited);

        - monitoring (including periodic testing of the integrity of
          the well) 'and reporting; and

        - plugging and abandonment (including financial responsibility
          demonstration).

     For a State to have a Federally approved UIC program-, it must meet
these minimum regulatory standards.  Proper oversight by EPA guarantees
that these standards are implemented.  Where EPA implements the UIC
program in a State, the Agency has to follow these same minimum standards.
As of March 18, 1985, 32 States1/ had primacy for Class I wells, and
EPA has started to implement the program in 25 States.

     In response to Congressional and Agency preliminary directives,
the Office of Drinking Water in 1983 began examining Class I wells which
inject hazardous wastes.  During August and September of 1983, a task
force with participants from EPA Headquarters and the Regions visited
20 hazardous waste injection facilities with 59 wells and obtained
detailed information on surrounding ground-water usage, wastes injected
and the regulatory controls applied to these wells.  In addition,
information on the rest of the existing Class I hazardous waste injection
facilities was obtained from State and EPA records by EPA Regional
personnel and a contractor.  Questionable information was verified by
contacting the companies and asking for a voluntary review of the data
originally obtained from EPA and State files.  Response to the verification
effort was approximately 70% (68 responses out of 94 requests).

RESULTS OF THE INVENTORY

     Nationwide, this inventory has identified 112 facilities which
inject hazardous wastes through 252 Class I wells.  Ninety of these
facilities were active and injected hazardous waste into 195 wells
during 1984 (only 181 wells were operating in 1983).  The other 57
wells (out of the 252 total) were inactive.  Of the 195 active wells,
152 operated continuously and 43 intermittently.  Of the 57 inactive
wells, 41 were abandoned, 3 were shut-in or in the process of changing
type of operation, and 13 had a permit pending or were under construction.
V "States" are defined in the SDWA as the 50 States, District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, Samoa, Trust
Territories and Northern Marianas.
                            -5-

-------
     Active hazardous waste injection wells are found in fifteen States.
The vast majority of the wells are located along the Gulf Coast and
near the Great Lakes.  Louisiana and Texas alone account for 66% of the
wells.  Other States with sizeable numbers of hazardous waste wells are
Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, and Oklahoma.  These two areas, the
Gulf Coast and Great Lakes regions, have similar historical and geological
backgrounds.  Historically, these States have had experience in underground
injection due mainly to oil and gas related activities, which have
provided abundant data on deep formations.  Geologically, formations  in
these States are amenable to efficient injection.  Another ccmmon
characteristic, though not exclusive to these two regions, is that both
are highly industrialized.

     Most of the wells were drilled between the mid-1960's and the
mid-1970's. There has been no significant increase in the rate of
construction of new wells since 1980.

     The biggest user of Class I HW wells is the chemical industry.
Manufacturers of organic chemicals account for 44.1% of the wells and
50.8% of the volume.  The petroleum refining industry accounts for 20%
of the wells and 25% of the volume.  Other chemical manufacturers
(agricultural, inorganic and miscellaneous) account for 17.5% of the
wells and 12.6% of the volume.  The metals and minerals industry
accounts for 8.2% of the wells and 5.8% of the volume.  The aerospace
industry accounts for 1% of the wells and 1.5% of the volume.

     Only 4.4% of the total injected volume is handled by commercial
waste disposers with 9.2% of the wells (18 wells at 13 facilities).
They are classified as "off-site wells" because they inject 'hazardous
waste which has been generated at other locations.. The waste must be
accompanied by a manifest under BORA.

     Hvdrcqeology

     Nationwide, most of the HW injection wells (76%) inject-into sand
and sandstone formations, 14.3% inject into limestones or dolomites,
and the remainder in shaley sandstones (9.7%).  In all cases, the
injection formations are unusable as potential future mineral resources
or as potable water sources.  Many (42.7%) of the confining  zone litholcgies
are shale, followed by shaley sandstone (20.8%), shaley limestone
(10.0%), and other (26.5%).

     The average depth of all hazardous waste injection wells from the
ground surface down to the top of the injection zone was found to be
4,063 feet.  The depth fron the ground surface to the bottom of aquifers
containing water with 10,000 mg/1 TDS averaged 1,179 feet.  There is  an
average separation between injection zones and USOtfs of approximately
2,925 feet.
                            -6-

-------
     Some information on the location and names of all water well
owners within a five-mile radius of injection wells was obtained,
although the information was not complete because it is not regularly
required by State agencies in reviewing well permit applications and so
is not readily available.  Much of the information was obtained indirectly,
for example, by identifying residences on a county map.  The number of
known water wells within a five-mile radius of the facilities visited
varied from 1 to 2,764 wells.

      Engineering

      Information on the engineering characteristics of HW injection
wells was relatively complete because the States usually require very
specific information on the design and construction of the wells before
a permit is issued.  Information was received on 99% of the HW wells.

Casings: All of the wells were found to have at least two casing strings
         and 46% have three strings.  Decisions concerning the selection
         of the casing depend on the hydraulic loading of the well,
         internal and external pressures, axial loading (tension and
         compression), temperatures, and corrosion action of the environ-
         ment.  In over half the wells the material used for casing is
         steel with a yield strength of 55,000 psi (J-55).  Other
         materials used are J-80 steel, fiberglass, fibercast, stainless
         steel and others.

         In every case, the wells are cemented from the surface to
         below the base of the lowermost USDW and from the injection
         zone trough the overlying confining zone.  In'addition, 88% of
         the wells are cemented for their entire length in at least one
         string.

Tubing:  The materials used in 94% of the wells were designed to be
         resistant to corrosion caused by the injection fluid.  There
         is no information available on the remaining 6%.  Tubing
         materials found were:  steel 66%, fiberglass 13%, fibercast
         10%, stainless steel 5% and unreported 6%.

Annulus and Packer: Mechanical packers were found in 93% of the wells
         and fluid seals in 7%.  Fluid seals isolate the annulus by
         maintaining a line of equal and opposite pressure between the
         injection and annulus fluids.
                            -7-

-------
     Mechanical Integrity Tests and Monitoring

     For most wells, continuous monitoring of the volume and the injection
and annulus pressure provides information as to the operation of wells.
However, Other tests are required before injection begins and every
five years thereafter to confirm the integrity of wells.  These tests
are generically known as "mechanical integrity tests"  (MITs).  Every HW
well visited had been tested for mechanical integrity prior to beginning
operation to evaluate the soundness of the tubular goods (casing,
tubing, and packer).  However, not all of the wells had been tested to
evaluate the soundness of the cementinq job.  Approximately 23% of the
active injection wells have been repermitted.  The MITs, in States
which have started to repeonit wells, have uncovered a few shortcomings
which could have potentially threatened USCWs.  These shortcomings have
been or will be corrected before any damage is done to USDWs.  Thus,
the MIT requirement is proving to be an excellent tool in identifying a
large number of mechanical defects and preventing contamination
of USCWs.

     There are only a few HW injection facilities at which deep aquifers
are monitored since such wells become another possible pathway for
undesired upward migration, are difficult to site and are very expensive
to construct.  At most of the facilities, monitoring is only done on
surficial aquifers that can be affected by surface facilities associated
with the injection wells.

     Waste Characteristics

     Information on both, waste concentration "and volume was obtained!
for 108 of 181 active Class I wells injecting hazardous wastes during
1983.  During 1983 the 108 wells disposed of a total of 6.2 billion
gallons of wastes, composed of roughly 5.9 billion gallons of water in
which 228 million gallons of wastes were diluted.  Extrapolating frcm
the data on the 108 wells to the total number of active wells, out of
the 11.5 billion gallons estimated to have been injected in L983, 423
million gallons were actual wastes while the remainder was water.  Cf
these 423 million gallons, it is estimated that 48% (203 million gallons)
are hazardous compounds.  Even though hazardous waste constituents only
account for 1.77% of the total volume, under the RCRA definition, the
whole volume (11.5 billion gallons) is considered hazardous.

     In this report, hazardous wastes are categorized as either acids,
organics, heavy metals, hazardous inorganics, or "other." Acids may be
either inorganic or organic, liquids with a pH eoual to or less than
2.0.  Heavy metals injected include chromium, copper and nickel, and
                                -8-

-------
hazardous inorganics include selenium and cyanide.  Qrganics consist
of those injected compounds which contained carbon.  The  "other" category
includes waste reported as chemical oxygen demand (COD),  biochemical
oxygen demand fBOD) "and 'total suspended solids  (TSS) which because of
the lack of specific data were assumed to be hazardous.   Acids and
organics were the prevalent wastes by volume, accounting  for 41% and
36% respectively of the non-aqueous hazardous components.  Heavy metals
account for 1.39%, hazardous inorganics for .08%, and  "other" for
20.99%.

     The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984  in  Section 201(f)
are particularly concerned with the disposal of solvents  (RCRA codes
F001, F002, F003, F004 and F005), and dioxin-containing compounds (RCRA
codes F020, F021, F022 and F023).  Hazardous waste codes  were obtained
for wastes from 89 active wells.  In general, the information was
sketchy.  Complete data (both RCRA codes and the amount injected) were
available for only 51 of the wells. From the information  obtained, only
eight well operators reported disposing of the solvents.  No wells were
reported to have been injecting dioxin-containing compounds.

     The Amendments are also concerned with the disposal  of the wastes
included in the "California list" (Section 201  (d)).   The only wastes
on this list found to be injected were hazardous wastes with a pH less
than or equal to 2.0, and nickel in a concentration greater than 134
mg/1.  Of the 181 wells which reported information on  pH, 25% (35
wells) reported injecting acids with pH <_ 2, and one well was injecting
nickel with a concentration of 600 mg/1.

Enforcement actions

     The information on non-compliance was obtained from  the surveillance
records of the States, but these records do not report whether the
cases were investigated under a Federally mandated UIC program or prior
to this.  A total of 84 nonconpliance incidents at 39  facilities involving
75 wells have been reported.  Administrative violations accounted for 50%
of these incidents and 50% (42 incidents) were related to construction,
design or operational problems.  Out of the 42 nonadministrative violations,
legal action was required in 10 cases, while the rest  were corrected
through voluntary compliance.1

     Of all of the violations, in only nine cases were there significant
problems which could have resulted in contamination of USDWs.  In five
cases, we have evidence that the release did not affect USDWs or if it
did, it was not.caused by the well:
^It was not clear in the State record whether legal action was taken  in
response to major violations.  In some cases major violations were
corrected through administrative or informal procedures.
                                -9-

-------
 0 Chemical Waste Management, an off-site facility in Ohio, did not
   discover leaks in the botton part of the longstring casing of
   their wells until large amounts of waste were injected into a
   shallower formation,  which was separated from the botton of the
   lowermost USDW by more than 1,500 feet, 1,000 feet of which is
   confining strata.  This operational problem was detected during
   mechanical integrity tests conducted to obtain information for a
   UIC permit.  The company was fined $12.5 million for these and
   other violations at the site.  Five of the six wells at the site
   have been repaired and the other may be abandoned.

 0 Leaks in the wells of the Chemical Resources, Inc., facility (off-site)
   in Oklahoma were discovered as a result of mechanical integrity
   tests performed as part of the implementation of the UIC program.
   The operator is now under State orders to repair the wells and is
   subject to on-going enforcement action.

 0 Rollins Environmental Service (formerly CLAW) in Louisiana discovered
   leaks in a well allegedly resulting fron the former owner's (CLAW)
   disregard for compatibility problems between the wastes, tubing,
   packer, and casing.  Rollins has repaired the leaks and is pursuing
   legal action against CLAW.

 0 Sonics International operated a ccmmercial (off-site) facility at
   Ranger, Texas.  Due to shortconings in the operation there was a well
   blow-out.  There was no ground-water contamination, and the site was
   cleaned up, and the wells were plugged and abandoned.

 0 Browning Ferris in Lake Charles, Louisiana contaminated a surficial
   aquifer at the site.   The State does not believe the contamination
   resulted from injection but rather fron surface impoundments.  The
   State is investigating the cause.

In one case, a final determination has not been made:

 0 At the Hereofina facility in North Carolina, injected wastes leaked
   fron the injection zone through the borehole into the Black Creek
   Formation which contains water with TDS ranging from <150 - >10,000
   mg/1.  Two injection wells have been plugged and abandoned and two
   have stopped operating and are presently being used for monitoring.
   The State is conducting an investigation.

 Finally, in three cases, contamination of a USEW has been documented:

 0 At the Hammermill facility in Erie, Pennsylvania, apparently because
 of excessive injection pressures, seme of the  injected waste migrated
 through the injection zone and reached an improperly abandoned
 well.  The site, which was closed in 1975, is  now on the "Superfund"
 list for remedial action.
                             -10-

-------
  0 Shortly after Louisiana received primacy, a well at the Tenneco
    site in Chalmatte, Louisiana was found to be leaking into one of
    the lower USDWs (not considered potable).  The contaminants consisted
    of "sour water" refinery waste which had corroded through both
    tubing and casing.  The well was plugged and abandoned.  Tenneco  is
    cleaning up the contamination by the use of recovery wells and
    reinjection into the permitted zone through several new injection
    wells.

  0 The Velsicol Chemical Corporation in Beaumont, Texas violated its
    permit by injecting fluids with a lower pH than authorized.  As a
    result, injected fluids did enter an unauthorized injection zone
    which contained formation water with a TDS content of 4,000 mg/1
    TDS.  Even though this formation is not considered a potential
    source of drinking water, Velsicol is using the injection well to
    clean up the contamination.  In addition, wells were drilled and
    approximately 1.5 million gallons of water were pumped out.

     Of special note are the number of violations at off-site (commercial)
facilities.  Of the total 25 off-site wells, fourteen (56%) have been
in violation compared to sixty (24%) of the total 227 on-site wells.
Additionally, all three of the abandoned off-site wells had had a major
violation.  The high percentage of non-compliance by off-site facilities
could be due to conpatibility problems inherent in injecting many types
of waste in the same wells.  It was also found that several of the
facilities were in violation because of the lack of adequate training
of the operator in regard to well operation.

FINDINGS

     The inventory has shown that hazardous waste injection is not a
widespread practice, as only 15 States have active wells that inject
hazardous wastes.  Another four States have wells that are no longer
injecting hazardous waste.

     Hazardous waste wells are concentrated in the industrial areas
around the Great Lakes and the Gulf Coast.  The geology of these States
lends itself to deep injection due to the existence of deep,, permeable,
stable formations with thick and extensive confining zones.  Because
oil and gas production also occurs in these areas, the States have
acquired considerable information on the regional geology and drilling
practices.  This information, in turn, can be applied to properly
evaluate injection facilities.
                                -11-

-------
     Based on the lithologies and separation, most USEWs apoear  to be
adequately separated fron injection zones.  However, this study  did
identify a few individual cases where the separations appear  inadequate
and where repermitting decisions will lead to case-by-case reconsiderations
and appropriate actions.

     Most HW injection wells (81%) are located in primacy States.  The
majority (129) of the active wells are in Texas and Louisiana.   At this
time, Texas has a fully implemented UIC program.  The rest of the
States are beginning implementation.  However, repermitting of Class; I
HW wells has been made a priority in all States.

     In addition, the implementation of the UIC program has produced:
data which further increases a State's ability to evaluate hazardous
waste injection.  Repermitting of hazardous waste wells and the  associated
mechanical integrity tests have identified shortcomings.  As  a result,
these shortcomings have been corrected and USDWs protected.   This
experience has increased the State's and EPA's knowledge of underground
injection and ability to properly implement the UIC program.

     Seme of the facilities visited have gone beyond the current requirements
in order to insure safe injection:

     Most facilities pretreat the waste to avoid down-hole problems
     such as plugging of the injection formation or interaction  of
     incompatible waste streams.

     Sane facilities have installed automatic shut-off systems which
     stop injection when certain monitored parameters reach soecific
     levels.

     Certain facilities which inject acids into limestones have  developed
     special operating techniques to prevent well blow-outs or other
     problems associated with this type of injection.

LOOKING AHEAD

     The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 have mandated the
ban of land disposal of hazardous waste unless the Administrator can
make a finding that the practice is protective of human health and the
environment.  Injection of hazardous waste is one of the practices
affected by this ban.

     In order to provide the technical information necessary  for the
Administrator to make the required findings, the Agency has started an
extensive review of the practice.  This review will try to establish
the adequacy of the regulations and may lead to regulatory changes
should the practice be allowed to continue.
                                -12-

-------
     The Agency will also review whether the adequacy of confining
zones to prevent the movement of injection fluids outside the injection
zone can be clearly established.  It is the ability of confining zones
to properlY isolate wastes which determines the suitability of the site
for injection.  Once information on the injection and confining zones
is obtained, it can be analyzed and models reoresentative of the geology
can be employed.  These models can provide a better evaluation of the
site with more assurances that vertical confinement exists.

     We will also evaluate the extent of horizontal movement in the
injection zone away fron the well.  Even though fluids injected into
deep formations move slowly (on the scale of inches per year), EPA
needs to know the extent of this movement to further evaluate the
safety of the practice.  Little empirical data exist on the long-term
movement of fluids in deep formations; however, experience with secondary
recovery of oil and gas shows that this movement is not significant
once the driving force (pumping) is stopped.  More studies will be
needed to confirm this.

     Another important consideration that needs to be fully studied is
the chemical fate and transport of the waste in the injection formation.
Factors such as interactions of the waste with the injection formation
and chemical and physical gradients need to be evaluated.

     Finally, we have not discussed Class IV wells as Dart of this
report.  As the study evolved, only thirty-four such wells were identified
of which six are active (two are CERCIA clean-up sites), seventeen
are permanently plugged and abandoned, and eleven are abandoned but not
yet plugged.  Moreover, the UIC program banned such wells effective
December 1984 for most States, and in June 1985 for the remaining
States.  The HSWA of 1984 also banned these facilities, effective May
1985.  The practice is, therefore, limited and soon to be terminated.
Most States already ban the practice, and when Class IV wells are
identified in those States they are shut down.  Accordingly, very
little data is available in State files.
                                -13-

-------

-------
                               Chapter I

                           Background-History
1.1   Introduction
      This report was prepared to meet the requirement of section 701
of "The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984".  This section
requires EPA to prepare a report on the characteristics of wells which
inject Hazardous Waste (HW) in The United States.  This chapter provides
a brief description of the relevant portions of the Underground Injection
Control (UIC) program and the background and methodology used to obtain
information for the report.

1.2   The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program

      The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program was mandated by
Congress in Part C of the Safe Drinking Water Act  (SDWA) of 1974 as
amended.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published final.
technical UIC regulations on June 24, 1980.  These regulations set
minimum technical standards which the States and EPA must follow in
implementing the UIC program.  The UIC technical regulations can be
found under 40 CFR Part 146.  The technical regulations were amended in
1982 to incorporate changes resulting from litigation settlements.

      The basic concept of the EPA UIC program is  to prevent the
contamination of underground sources of drinking water (USDW)* by
keeping injected fluids within the well and in the intended injection
zone.  Two categories of wells are identified by the UIC regulations
for injection of hazardous waste, i.e., Class I and Class TV.  Class I
wells inject hazardous waste below the lowermost USDW and Class IV
wells inject into or above a USDW.  Stringent requirements in the
regulations pertain to Class I wells.  Class IV wells have been banned
and are required to be plugged and abandoned six months after" the UIC
program becomes effective in a State.  Furthermore, the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 have reinforced the ban by requiring all
Class IV wells to be plugged and abandoned by May  8, 1985 (KCRA, Section
7010).  Therefore, this study includes a detailed  inventory of Class I
wells, since 701(a) of the HSWA requires the Agency to inventory only
those wells... which inject hazardous waste (emphasis added); the ban
on Class IV wells means no such well may "inject" hazardous waste after
May 8, 1985.  Nevertheless, for informational purposes, EPA has appended
the raw data on Class IV wells available to the Agency on the 34 active
and closed Class IV wells which have injected HW, that have been identified
during the preparation of this report.  The Agency has placed a high
priority upon ensuring that all Class IV wells are closed and plugged
as required by the HSWA and EPA regulations.
* As defined in 40 CFR §144.3

-------
     There are five major ways in which injection practices can cause
fluids to migrate into OSDWs.   The technical requirements in the UIC
regulations are therefore, designed to deal with the five pathways of
fluid migration as described below:

       (1) Faulty Well Construction

           Leaks in Che well casing or the movement of fluid
           forced back up between the well's outer casing and
           the well bore can cause contamination of USDWs.
           The regulations require adequate casing and cementing
           to protect USDWs and to isolate the injection zone.
           The absence of significant leaks and fluid movement
           in the space between the casing and the well bore must
           be demonstrated upon well completion and at least every
           five years thereafter by a "mechanical integrity test", as
           defined in 40 CFR §146.08.

       (2)  Improperly Plugged or Completed Wells in the Zone of
            Endangering Influence;

            Fluids from the pressurized area in the injection zone
            may be forced upward through improperly plugged or
            completed wells that penetrate the injection interval in
            the zone of endangering influence.   These fluids may migrate
            into USDWs.  The UIC regulations require that all wells
            penetrating the injection zone in the zone of endangering
            influence be reviewed to assure that they are properly
            completed or plugged.   Corrective action must be taken
            if they are not completed or plugged to prevent fluids
            migration.  Newly  abandoned wells must be plugged to
            conform with EPA and State OIC procedures.

       (3)  Faulty or Fractured Confining Strata:

            Fluid may be forced upward out of the injection zone
            through faults or  fractures in the  confining formations,
            as the result of injection.  The UIC regulations require
            that wells be sited so that they inject below an adequate
            .confining formation.  Injection pressure must be controlled
            so that fractures  are not propagated in the injection zone
            or initiated in the confining formation that could  cause
            the movement of injection or formation fluids into  an
            underground source of drinking water (USDW).
                                  1-2

-------
           (4)  Lateral Displacement:

                Fluid may be displaced from the injection zone into
                hydraulically connected USDWs as a result of the injection
                pressure.  The regulations require careful planning to
                select the injection site to prevent such situations.
                Information on the continuity of the injection and
                confining zones must be considered when evaluating the
                site, as well as the proximity of injection wells to
                USDWs.  Also faults and the distance from recharge areas
                must be taken into account.  Well operators must
                control injection pressure and conduct other monitoring
                activities to prevent the lateral migration of fluids.

           (5)  Direct Injection:

                Some injection wells inject into or above USDWs.  EPA
                has banned all injection of hazardous waste into or
                above underground sources of drinking water except for
                wells associated with Federal activities designed to
                clean up an aquifer.

             As of March 18, 1985, 32 States* had applied fo-r and
       received enforcement authority of the UIC program for Class I
       HW wells.  The Agency has promulgated 25 programs in States that
       chose not to or did not obtain delegation of the UIC program for
       Class I HW wells.

1.3    Hazardous Waste Well Assessment and Inventory

1.3.1  Need for the Assessment and Inventory

            In 1981, the Office of Solid Waste of EPA conducted a
       survey of hazardous wastes management practices by sending
       questionnaires to owners and operators of facilities who had
*"States" are defined in the Safe Drinking Water Act as the 50 States,
 Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, Samoa, Guam,
 the Trust Territories and the Northern Marianas (a total of 57).
                                  1-3

-------
notified the Agency that they handled hazardous wastes, pursuant
to notification requirements under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA).  The results of this survey were published
in "National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators and Treatment,
Storage and Disposal Facilities Regulated Under RCRA in 1981"
(EPA 530/SW-84-005, April 1984).

     The RCRA survey identified 87 hazardous waste injection
facilities used to dispose of an estimated 8.7 billion gallons
per year.  As a result of the magnitude of volume of the waste
injected, the Agency started a limited effort to investigate
the characteristics of hazardous waste injection.

     Almost concurrently, several bills were introduced in
Congress (S-757, HR 5959 and HR 2867) each of which required
EPA to prepare a report on hazardous waste injection practices.
On October 5, 1984, Congress passed the reauthorization of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  The amendments
in the reauthorization took the short title of "The Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984" and became effective November 8, 1984.
Included is the prohibition of injection of certain hazardous
wastes within 45 months of enactment, unless the EPA Administrator
makes a finding that such injection is not damaging to human health
and the environment.  Another requirement is that EPA prepare a
report to Congress on hazardous waste injection (section 701).
Section 701 of the "Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendment of 1984"
reads (verbatim):

"Report to Congress on Injection of Hazardous Waste.

     (a) The Administrator, in cooperation with the States, shall
compile and, not later than 6 months after the date of enactment
of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, submit to
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the United
States Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the
United States House of Representatives, an inventory of all
wells in the United States which inject hazardous wastes.  The
inventory shall include the following information:

     " (1) the location and depth of each well;

       (2) engineering and construction details of each
           including the thickness and composition of its
           casing, the width and content of the annulus, and
           pump pressure and capacity;
                           1-4

-------
             (3) the hydrogeological characteristics of the overlying
                 and underlying strata, as well as that into which the
                 waste is injected;

             (4) the location and size of all drinking water aquifers
                 penetrated by the well, or within a one-mile radius of
                 the well or within two hundred feet below the well
                 injection point;

             (5) the location, capacity, and population served by each
                 well providing drinking or irrigation water which is
                 within a five-mile radius of the injection well;

             (6) the nature and volume of the waste injected during the
                 one-year period immediately preceding the date of the
                 report;

             (7) the dates and nature of the inspections of the injection
                 wells conducted by independent third parties or agents
                 of State, Federal or local government;

             (8) the name and address of all overseers and operators of
                 the well and any disposal facility associated with it;

             (9) the identification of all wells at which enforcement
                 actions  have been initiated under this Act (by reasons
                 of well  failure, operator error,  groundwater contamination
                 or for other reasons) and an identification of the
                 wastes involved in such enforcement actions; and

            (10) such other information as the Administrator may, in his
                 discretion,  deem necessary to define the scope and nature
                 of hazardous waste disposal in the United States through
                 underground  injection."

         (b) In fulfilling the requirements of paragraphs (3) through (5)
       of subsection (a), the Administrator need only submit such information
       as can be obtained from currently existing State records and from
       site visits  to at  least 20 facilities containing wells which inject
       hazardous waste.

         (c) The states shall make available to the Administrator such
       information  as he  deems necessary to accomplish the objectives of
       this section."

1.3.2  Methodology

            In preparation for the report required in the several bills
                                  1-5

-------
introduced, which culminated with the promulgation of section 701,
of the "Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984",  EPA
started gathering information in late 1983.  In order to conduct
an in-depth assessment of hazardous waste injection wells, EPA.
selected 20 facilities representing a cross section of geographic
areas, on-and off-site waste generation and mixed delegation
situations.  These 20 facilities operate a total of 59 injection
wells with waste streams that cover a broad spectrum.  The focal
points of this assessment study were facility design, siting,
construction, operation and maintenance of both above ground
facilities regulated under RCRA and below ground facilities
regulated under UIC.  The existing Federal and State oversight
and enforcement programs were also assessed*  These programs were
examined to determine if there were significant regulatory gaps.
Three (3) of the twenty facilities were subsequently found not to
meet the Class I hazardous waste definition and are not included
in this report.

     EPA selected the 20 facilities based on a 1981 hazardous
waste injection well inventory compiled by the Office of Solid
Waste (OSW) as a result of the notification process under the
authority of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
(The 1981 inventory identified 87 hazardous waste injection
facilities nationwide with a total estimated injection volume
of 8.7 billion gallons in 1981.)  In order to investigate the
extent and impact of this practice, a coordinated effort between
the Office of Drinking Water, the Office of Solid Waste, EPA
Regions and States,  was launched.  Table 1-1 lists the 20 facilities
selected for the detailed assessment.  The current operating
performance of the injection wells was not used as a criterion
for the selection of these wells.  Figure 1-1 shows the location
of these facilities on the national map.

     The facilities selected represent a sample size of over
20% of the total known hazardous waste injection wells in the
United States.  Table 1-2 portrays the various criteria that
the selected sites represent.

     Additional analysis on the facilities based on their age,
waste distribution,  industrial category and depth of injection
zone/USDW separation was conducted in order to establish a firm
relationship with the data base of all hazardous waste injection
wells.  The results of the assessment of the 20 facilities and data
obtained on the other HW facilities are used to portray the
national picture of all the Class I HW injection wells.

     Following the selection of the facilities, a field assessment
was conducted.  EPA organized a technical task force which was
led by the Office of Drinking Water (ODW) in cooperation with
the Office of Solid Waste (OSW).  The technical task force included
individuals in several disciplines such as geology, environmental
                           1-6

-------
                           Table 1-1

 LIST OF CLASS I HAZARDOUS WASTE INJECTION FACILITIES VISITED

                                                     # Wells at
 Region     State     Facility Name and Location      Facility

 III         WV       E.I.Dupont De Nemours*             1
                      Belle, West Virginia

 IV          AL       Stauffer Chemical                  3
                      Bucks, Alabama

             FL       Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical         1
                      Mulberry, Florida

             KY       E.I.Dupont De Nemours              2
                      Louisville, Kentucky

             MS       Filtrol Corporation                1
                      Jackson, Mississippi

             TN       Stauffer Chemical**                4
                      Mt. Pleasant, Tennessee

  V          IL       Allied Chemical Corporation        1
                      Danville, Illinois

                      Cabot Corporation                  2
                      Tuscola, Illinois

             IN       Inland Steel                       1
                      Gary, Indiana

             MI       BASF Wyandotte Corporation         3
                      Holland, Michigan

             OH       SOHIO Chemical Corporation         3
                      Lima, Ohio

                      Chemical Waste                     6
                      Management Incorporated
                      Vickery, Ohio

 VI          LA       Rollins Environmental Services     1
                      Plaquemine, Louisiana

 * State of West Virginia and Region III subsequently determined
   that the waste injected by this facility does not meet the
   RCRA definition for classification as a hazardous waste management
   facility,

** State of Tennessee later determined that this facility does  not
   inject "hazardous waste".   TN has been granted authorization
   under RCRA to make this determination.
                             1-7

-------
LIST OF CLASS I HAZARDOUS WASTE INJECTION FACILITIES VISITED  (cont'd.)
                                                         # Wells  at
     Region     State     Facility Name and Location      Facility
     VI          LA       Shell Oil Company                 12
                          Norco, Louisiana
                 OK       Chemical Resources                  1
                          Tulaa,  Oklahoma

                 TX       E.I.Dupont                        10
                          Victoria, Texas

                          Empak,  Incorporated                1
                          Deerpark, Texas

                          Gibraltar Wastewaters              1
                          Winona, Texas

                          Monsanto Company                   4
                          Alvin,  Texas

     IX          CA       Rio Bravo Refining                  1
                          Kern County, California
          Total  14       20                                59
                                 1-8

-------
CO
CO
=3
O
to
CO
o
JJJ»
c5

                                                                                     £

                                                                                     5   E
                                 /
                                                               1-9
                                                                                     a
                                                                                     UJ
                                                                                     12    Q
                                                                                     z    w
                                                                                     —    H

                                                                                     I    «
                                                                                     Z    H-l
                                                                                    O    «

-------
 CO
 C  -H
 O  *
1-1  W     O
 (JO O     O
 
                •H h eti
a
Ed
cn


•x
1
1— 1

Cd
>j
5
3
H















M
H
>— i
M
CJ
<;
EX*

Cu
O
w
W
Cd
z
u
>
1— 1
H
<3
H
Z
U
en
U
OS
Od
Cd
Ofi

3J O
U ^.
CO »
> U

CO S
UJ i-t
, (j
•H '•l
U C.
•* C
r-t 0
•H Z
u ~~~
CO >>
C&4 U
1-1
u
Q-
                               -^     in
                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                            •.N
                                                                                 —i  .N  —«
                                                                                     .N  —i

                                                                                                                    00
                                                                                                                      •

                                                                                                                    r-.
                                                                  ca
                                                                  (I)
                                                                                                                 co

                                                                                                                 O
                                                                                                                T3
                                                                                                                 U
                                                                                                                 CO
                                                                                                                 N
                                                                                                                 CO
                                                                                                                .e

                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                                                    u
                                                                                                                                    0)
                                                                                                                                    C

                                                                                                                                    O
                                                                                                                 C
                                                                                                                 (U
                                                                                                                 3
                                                                                                                 tr
                                                                                                                 *
                                                       Si
S  Z  h-3
o  M  M
                                                                                                                     <0
                                                                                                                     •u
                                                                                                  (0
                                                                                                  C
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                                                     §
                        C
                        o
                    <  -rt
                    eu  BO     M
                    WO)      M
                        as      M
                                                                                                 y-i
                                                                                                  o
                                                                   0)
                                                                   co
                                                                   D

                                                                  H
                                                                         I-10

-------
and chemical engineering, geochemistry and hydrology.  The assess-
ment task force was augmented by scientific and technical support
from the EPA Regional Offices and States responsible for the
selected facilities.

     Visits to all the selected facilities took place during the
month of September 1983.  Regional personnel participated in all
the visits and Headquarters ODW personnel accompanied them on 17
out of the 20 visits.  An OSW representative also participated
in two of the visits.  These site visits served to corroborate data
from State and EPA files and to make members from the task force
familiar with each site.

     After the site visits, the Regional participants prepared a
facility report in the format in Table 1-3 as recommended by
the task force.  A compilation of the field reports from the
twenty facilities actually visited by EPA personnel is available
from the Office of Drinking Water or the appropriate Regional
Office.

     Information on the hazardous waste facilities not visited
was obtained from EPA and State files and other miscellaneous
sources.

     Upon review of the information obtained, it was compiled in
an electronic file for easy retrieval.  Both the paper and
computer files were reviewed for missing information.  Missing
data were identified and an effort was made to obtain them.
These efforts included direct contact with 94 hazardous waste
injection facilities to verify data obtained mainly from State
files.  There was approximately 70% response to this verification
effort.  Table 1-4 gives a description of the quality of the
data obtained in the overall information gathering effort.

     In order to answer questions posed in Section 701 of "The
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984", the information
obtained in the inventory and assessment was summarized under:
general findings; hydrogeologic environment; engineering charac-
teristics;  waste characteristics; and regulatory controls.   In
addition, the data obtained in the inventory and assessment  have
been included in the appendices of this report.   These appendices
have been organized in accordance with the specific information
obtained to answer the questions  in Section 701  of the RCRA  amend-
ments.
                           1-11

-------
                         TABLE 1-3

OUTLINE OF CLASS I HAZARDOUS WASTE INJECTION FACILITY REPORT
               (ONE REPORT FOR EACH FACILITY)

                  Facility Identification

                  Summary

                  Introduction

                  Geologic and Hydrologic Environment

                  Well Design and Evaluation

                  Regulatory Controls (UIC, RCRA, NPDES)

                  Conclusions

                  Recommendations

                  References

                  Appendices (as needed)
                         1-12

-------
53
ELLS — QUALITY OF DATA COLLECTED
3
Z
O
^H
H
CJ
W
*->
z
rH

W
H
CO
<
3
CO
3
O
§
^J
CM
2|
K




















CO
4J
C
01
cS
5s
y
CO
M
3
y
%
TJ
O
O
bo
is
u
01
^*< f




CO
co
0)
c
01
u
01
rH
O.
B
O
CJ


TJ
o
o
bO

5S
u
01



e
o
1-1
TJ
01
4J
o
01
rH
iH
o
CJ

ation
g
0
<4H
C
M
4-1
CO
CJ
fl
>4H
•H
4J
C
01
TJ
M
rH
rH
0)
3
rH
CO
M
01
C
<$
Original permitting information not always
available.
TJ
O
O
bo











TJ
o
o
bo












CO
4-1
CO
o
rH
rH
01
3
rH
CO
M
O>
c
3
Not always site specific.
Not well documented in files.
Not well documented in files.
TJ l-i (-1
O "* ft
O * CO
bO <4H 14M











TJ H r-
O •H ft
O W CO
bO •»"» <4H














CO
co bo
Q 0
fH
rH O
CO *
y TJ
•H 5s CO
box: 3
0 O Q
rH O) U)
0 O S
CU
o

TJ
o
o
bO











TJ
o
o
00















bo
ft
co
01
Q

rH
rH
1
CU
4J
cfl
rl
y
y
cfl
CO
1
rH
CO
4-1
O
c
CO
4-1
CO
TJ
60
C
•H
4-1
i
3
TJ
O
O
60
5S
U
01
>







TJ
O
O
60

5s
U
01
>















ction
u
4J
CO
C
o
o

•
0)
4-1
CO
M
y
y
cfl
CO
5s
CO
r?
CO
U
o
z
u
o
0
o.
fr
01







t-l
o
a

C?
01
>









&
0
<;

e
•H
co
rH
rH
4H <4-|











f-l i-l
•H f|
<0 cfl
4H 14.1






09
y
•H C
4J O
CO fl
•H 4J
U CO
01 M
4-1 4-1
harac
oncen
CJ CJ
01 0)
4J u
co co
CO cfl
3 3

injection.
TJ
O
O
60











TJ
O
O
60















01
8
rH
0
>
01
4-1
CO
CO
3

Partially documented in General Correspondence
TJ
O
O
60











M
O
O
Q.















60
C
•H
4J
CO
01
H

rH
fH
£























CO
4-1
C

Q
o>
M
•H
3
CT
01
K
60
C
•H
U
0
iJ
•H
c
o
•&
CO
rH
CO
•H
y
•H
UH
<4H
O
0)
4-1
cfl
4-1
CO
e
o
u
(b
TJ
O
O
bO











TJ
O
o
60












TJ
ft
S
rH
rVl
O
•H
4-i
y
O)
•>-)
c
I— 1

•
co
rH
rH
5
c
O
fl
4-1
y
0)
T~)
C
ft
u
o
M-l
4-1
O
z
TJ
O
0
60











TJ
O
O
60











CO
rH
rH
01
3
60
C
•H
I-l
O
4J
•H
C
o
s

•
TJ
0)
4J
C
0)
y
0
TJ
fH
rH
01
3
4J
0
e
co
rH
Cfl
iH
y
•H
>4H
M-4
O
01
4-1
CO
4-1
CO
a •
o
M
b
TJ
O
O
60











TJ
0
O
bo


01
y
c
cfl
fH
rH
•H
01
>
rl
3
CO

TJ
C
cfl
C
0
•H
4-1
y
01
a.
CO
c
i— i
Not well documented.
i-i
o
o
a











M
o
o
a.















0)
y
c
cfl
•H
rH
a
B
0
y
C
£
Not well documented.
M
0
O
0.











IH
O
O
a.














c
Actio
rH
cfl
•H
T5
01
S
0)
oi

M
•H
CO
<4H











U
•H
CO
>4H











co
C
O
iH
mitat
•H
rJ

4H
ft

)•!
01
CU
*
cu
rH
ft
14H
01
4-1
CO
4-1
CO
B
•H
01
rH
U3
CO
rH
•H
CO
CO
4-1
O
z
TJ r<
0 0
o o
bo cu











U M
•H 0
CO o
u-i a.









CO
rH
rH
01
3

5s
CO rH
3 a
o a
01 3
C CO
CO
rH M
rH 0)
01 u
y to
co 3
•H
2
                                                                     u-i
                                                                                       vO
                                                                                                            co
                                                                                                                           o     -•
                                                                                                                                         '.N

-------
     As is to be expected in a limited information gathering
effort like this one, the data presented do not represent a
complete picture.  As an example, table III-2, in page III-10
indicates that there is a wide variation in the thickness of
confining zones; however, there is not enough available information
on whether the thicker confining zones are more impermeable than
the thin ones.  A site specific effort would be necessary to
ascertain this fact.
                           1-14

-------
                               Chapter II

                            General Findings
2.1    Introduction
            This chapter describes the general characteristics of
       hazardous waste wells nationwide.  Parameters considered are:

       0 Well Operating Status;
       0 Volumes Injected;
       0 Well Classes;
       0 Type of Operation (on-site,  off-site);
       0 Geographical distribution;
       0 Age of the Wells;
       0 Users; and
       0 Surface Facilities.

       Additionally, the appendices  contain tables showing the status;
the name and address (active);  the type and the  RCRA ID numbers for
the wells.

2.2    Well Operating Status

            In the context  of this report, the term "active well" is
       used to describe a hazardous  waste (HW) well which is operated
       either continuously  on a regular schedule,  or on an occasional
       or intermittent basis and for which there are no extensive
       shut-ins or workovers.*   This category includes all intermittent,
       back-up and standby  HW wells,  provided that they are in operational
       condition.   "Abandoned well"  is a HW well whose use has been
       temporarily or permanently discontinued,  including any well
       that has ceased HW injection  or is plugged  and abandoned.
       "Other" refers to any HW well which has been permitted but not
       yet drilled, a well  under construction, a completed well not
       yet injecting, or a  well with a permit pending.  "Shut in" refers
       to a well that is indefinitely shut in for  repair or for other
       reasons.

            Nationwide, there are 112 facilities,  identified by this
       inventory,  that have a total  of 252 wells that fall into one of
       the categories mentioned above.  Ninety of  these facilities
       injected hazardous waste into 195 wells during 1984,  with 152
       operating continuously and 43 operating intermittently.   The
       balance of  the 252 wells (57  wells)are inactive, either abandoned
       (41); shut  in or in  the  process of changing type of operation
       (3); or with a permit pending  or under construction (13).
       *  "Active"  and  "Active I"  respectively  in  the  appendices

-------
            The States with the largest number of active HW wells are:
       Texas with 69; Louisiana with 60; Ohio with 14; and Michigan
       with 11.  Figure II-l gives the percentages of wells in each
       operational category.  Table II-l gives the total number of
       wells and facilities in each of the operational categories for
       each State.

2.3    Volumes Injected

            A total of 144 wells reported actual injection volumes in 1983.
       The volume injected in the 144 wells in 1983 was 8.309 billion
       gallons.  An additional 37 wells were active in 1983, but they did
       not report volumes injected.  The volume injected for these additional
       37 wells was calculated from the reported injection rate.  This
       calculated volume was then corrected by multiplying by 0.73 which
       was the ratio of the reported volume vs. the volumes calculated
       from the injection rate for 114 wells.  (These 114 wells reported
       both injection volumes and injection rates in 1983.)

            To summarize:

       8 Volume reported for 144 HW wells               8.309 billion gal.

       0 Volume computed for 37 wells                  [4.425 billion gal.]

       0 Corrected by multiplying by 0.73              +3.230 billion gal.

       " Total reported and computed for 181* wells    11.539 billion gal.

            A comparison of design vs. reported volume in 93 out of the 195
       active wells indicate that only 29% of their capacity is being used
       This would indicate that the total capacity of all BOW injection wells
       is approximately 40 billion gallons per year.

2.4    Well Classes
            As explained in Chapter I, Class I by definition includes
       HW wells that inject into deep formations which are below USDWs;
       Class IV refers to those HW wells that inject into or above
       USDWs.  The UIC Regulations apply very stringent standards to
       assure that Class I HW wells do not contaminate USDWs and ban
       Class IV HW wells.
* Only 181 wells were active in 1983.  An additional 12 wells resumed
  or started injection in 1984.
                                  II-2

-------
01
-I
_l  01
UJ  LJ
I  -J
U-  U
O  <
    LL
01
    C\J
01
<  CO
z:
a
H
    LU
LLJ  in
a.  CM
a
                                                         LO
                                                         00
                                                         u
                           rr-s

-------
                                  TABLE IX-1

              OPERATING STATUS OF CLASS I HAZARDOUS WASTE WELLS
               AT FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES (AUGUST 1984)
ACTIVE
FACILITIES
STATE TOTAL
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Florida
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
Mississippi
North Carolina
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Texas
Wyoming
TOTALS
1
1
3
2
0
2
4
6
1
1
22
7
1
0
5
5
0
29
0
90
ACTIVE
WELLS
TOTAL
2
1
4
2
0
4
6
8
5
2
60
11
1
0
14
6
0
69
0
195
ABANDONED
WELLS
TOTAL
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
2
0
5
11
0
4
1
1
3
7
0
41
OTHER
WELLS
TOTAL
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
1
16
                                                                    WELLS/
                                                                   FACILITY
                                                                     TOTAL*-**

                                                                      3/1

                                                                      2/1

                                                                      5/3

                                                                      4/3

                                                                      1/1

                                                                      4/2

                                                                      6/4

                                                                     13/10

                                                                      7/2

                                                                      2/1

                                                                     71/28

                                                                     22/10

                                                                      1/1

                                                                      4/1

                                                                     15/5

                                                                      8/6

                                                                      3/1

                                                                     79/31

                                                                   '   1/1

                                                                    252/112
* Total includes inactive and active facilities

** Since there are sane "inactive" wells in "active" facilities, for the
sake of clarity a separate column for facilities where there are inactive
(abandoned, others) wells has not been included.
                                     II-4

-------































•.N
1
I-l
M
a
1






















































CO
oo
ON
f^
z
M
CO
td
S3
H
CO
Cd
H
M
Z
3
Cd
H
Z
M
Z
o
M
H
U
Cd
Z
i^

Cd
£H
CO
<;
3

CO
3
O

QC
<«
N
2
fa
o
U
3^
,j
o
>

Q
Cd
£_i

Z
1^
H
CO
Ed



















C/5
Ofj _]
WJ
^^
§Cd
3
Z fa
d s
3
8
Q
Cd Cd
H 33
£§
5 o
z >
M

CO
& iJ
Cd i-4
S W
2 2
•K Z fa
Q 0
Cd
B
li Cd Cd
O H 33
CJ CJ S
H J
"-> O
Z >
IH



CO
cri ,-J
cd 3
pa cd
1 *
O Z fa
Cd O
H
£
o
CU
Cd Q
K Ed Cd
H 33
£3
is
2 >
^











Cd
H
<;
E-3
05
















.N —• sf — H •* lO






OO O 00 O O O
o m co ON o °o
,» .N ON CO O r-.
•k A ft •» MM
co oo m O o >n
i-. sr o co o o
«3- O '.N CO -.N ON
-H 00 00 *H vO O
m vo m o
CO p.. .N


1 1 -.N 1 1 -N




1 1 .N 1 1 O
0 2
m O
* M
VO *H
'.N ON
00 f*
* M
O •»
vO -4
CO ""'



1

•.N — ' '.N ~* -if CO







CO O vO O O O
o m co ON o "*
sr '.N -3- co o r*-
CO 00 ON O O •*
f»» -3" r-» co o ^
~3- O CO CO .-M — "^
•—I OO !-• — * vO ^O
in m oo
r-»







CO
•H
OB C 09
ca CO 1* <0 i-l
8 CO CO O TJ O
cfl Jd C "*-i . i-t C
ja co co 1-1 }-> -H
CO c8 ^d "H O "— 1
tH rH I-l CO i-H r*
*4 < •< U fa M
















r-x m .N m
m





O O O vO
00 0 0 CO
\o o o -*
l^ O O 00
•H O O -N
co r^ co O
\O !*•> CO ^JO
oo ON r>. -^
-^ sr ON
co

-4 1 | 00




-H 1 1 -3-
.N -N
sj. -4
M A
m -N
.N -N
-H 00
*l •»
O ON
m •*
*
•-4



vo m '.N r~
-3-






ON O O -N
m O o -"
•.N O O O
-.N O O ^O
ON O O O
-^ r-. co '.M
\O f~- CO ^O
CO ON |~. vO
— < -* r^

'.N





CO
>> c
CO J^ CO
C CO O i-(
co CO 3 CO
1-1 CO 4-1 "H
•O G C 3
C « CU 0
1-4 M M -J
















—4
F^





o
vr
ON
m
CO
ON
m
r*
.N


in




o
sr
ON
^
'.N
O
°1
•.N
.•M
^^





vO







0
O
o_
CO
CO
o
CO
m
— *








C
«
bO
•H
J=
U
5
















—H






O
o
o^
o
o
o
o
co
I—I


t




1








—4







o
0
o^
0
0
0^
o
CO
*-*






•H
a
Q.
•H
Cfl
CO
1-1
ca
Cfl
•H
















>3"
—•4





rv
v£>
^H
0
CO
r-»
co
ON
CO


«3-




.N
vO
ao
M
O
>3-
ON
O
r»»





O
-H






in
o
CO
ON
00
p»
•-N
-.•vi
CO










O
•H
C§
















vO






O
.N
CO
ON
in
-3-
*
ao
oo
m


—4




O
0
vO
ft
l-»
ON
vO
00
00
*-^





m







o
•.>*
r>-
v£>
r-.
ON
ON
CO



*




O
J2
CO
r- 1
3














«
•K
co •— '
vo ao
—4




CO .->>»
\G P^
vO vO
v£ -H
sO O
ON vO
M *«
O 00
ON CO
o m
« M
-3- -H
i—4

-* r»*
•-4 CO



00 r~-
-i O
vO — <
9* *
m -N
o\ o
m r~
f> •*
-< ON
r~. .N
—4 .N
9> *
-4 CO



ON -3-
sr <•
»-H





in m
•% 
c'o
•H -I-1
co co
00 CO
ca I
t-i 3
cu *H
> o
CO >
T3 --J
CU CO
4J 3
I-l 4J
0 CJ
a. ca
cu
1-4 bO
C
B •*
0 tJ
LJ Co
W *v
14-1 Ou
B
T3 O
cu u
w
3 >N
8"°
O-rt
^*
ej cu
rt) S
w p
0) H
43 CU
4J
co i)
> T3
CO
J3 CO
CO
co S co
 co ^r
M-l 1—4
CU -H
CO CO
01 i-l >-i
£* £ °
H H M-4
•K




















•
•3-
oo
ON
••H
c
•H
O
•H
*J
CO
U
CU
a.
0

•o
cu
§
CO
CO
t .
M
t j
M
o
T3
CU
4^
I-l
CO
4J
CO
CO
00
ON
•—4

G
•H

!
cu
•H
4J
U
_«
•
4-1
O
g
cu
t-t
cu
3

4J
CO
JS,
4-1

CO
rH
,^
CU
3
C
CO
cu
4J
f-l
3
0
fa
•K
•K
11-5

-------
            Table II-1 gives the location of and operating status of
       Class I HW wells that have been identified nationwide.  There
       are five wells, three in Pennsylvania and two in California,
       which are or will be used to restore aquifers under the Compre-
       hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
       (CERCLA).  These wells are technically Class IV wells but are
       authorized under a special exemption.  They are mentioned here
       because they will continue to operate legally.

            As indicated by Table II-l, 195 active Class I HW wells
       in 90 facilities* have been identified in 15 States.

2.5    Type of operation

            In the course of the HW well assessment and inventory, it
       was observed that 90.1% of the wells were owned and operated by
       the waste generators themselves and were located at the site of
       the generating facility.  These wells have been classified as
       "on-site" wells.  Commercial wells operated by persons who
       collect service fees for the disposal of the waste and which are
       located at places other than the waste generating facility are
       classified as "off-site" wells.  A total of 25 HW wells in 16
       facilities have been identified as off-site; 18 of which are
       active.  The remaining seven were either abandoned or in the
       process of being built or recompleted.  The "off-site" wells
       have special characteristics which make them more susceptible to
       problems and they account for an inordinate number of violations.
       Chapter VI lists the violations and Chapter VII gives some
       possible reasons for them. Table II-3 and Figure II-2 shows the
       number of off-site wells and facilities for each State.  The
       total volume injected into these wells is 4.1% of the total
       estimated volume.

2.6    Geographic Distribution

            The great majority of HW injection wells are located in the
       Gulf Coast and Great Lakes states.  Figure II-3 shows the number
       of active HW wells in each state.  The siting of HW wells in a
       certain region of The United States follows the same historical
* As of the time of this report decisions are being made as to the
  classification of a small number of wells.   Furthermore, there is the
  possibility that the well classification of several of the wells
  listed may change due to the fact that well classification is a
  derivative function that depends on RCTLA regulations and State de-
  terminations (where applicable).
                                  11-6

-------
                                Table II-3
                  OFF-SITE WELLS AND FACILITIES IN EACH STATE
STATE
Alaska
California
Louisiana
Ohio
Oklahoma
Texas

WELLS
1
1
2
5
1
_8
18
FACILITIES
1
1
2
1
1
_J_
13
WELLS
1
0
0
1
0
_5
7
FACILITIES
1
0
0
1
0
^^•^
6
WELLS
2
1
2
6
1
_L3
25
FACILI'
1
1
2
1
1
12
16<
* There are both active and inactive wells at some off-site facilities
                                II-7

-------
an
3
CJ
    01
    -J
    LLJ
    UJ
    I—
    U
    LU
    h-
cn
 i
LL
LL
a

o<3

UJ
h-
    a
                                                               to
                                                                I
                                                               z
                                                               a
                                                          x

3
>,
1
a
(0
i
a
in
i
a
•^>
i
a
en
i
a

-------
                           FIGURE  II-3
DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVE CIASS I HAZARDOUS WASTE  INJDCTION WELLS (1984]
                                .11-9

-------
       and geological pattern.  The States with the great majority of
       wells Texas, Louisiana, Ohio and Michigan have had similar
       historical and geological backgrounds.  Historically, these
       States have had experience in underground injection due mainly
       to oil and gas related activities.  Geologically, there are
       formations in these States which are amenable to efficient injection.
       Another common characteristic, although not exclusive to just these two
       regions, is that both are highly industrialized.

            Tables II-l and II-2 give the geographical distribution of
       the 195 HW wells that were active in 1984 by state and estimated
       volume of injection for 181 wells that were active in 1983, re-
       spectively.  These tables demonstrate that 66.0% of all active
       identified HW wells are located in just 2 States, Texas and
       Louisiana, and that they account for 69.42 of the total estimated
       volume of hazardous waste injected in 1983.

2.7    Age of Wells

            The use of wells for injection of hazardous waste is a
       relatively recent development.  Figure IT-4 is a graphic
       representation of the distribution of the drilling date for all
       HW wells.  The earlier HW wells were generally drilled to serve
       other purposes such as oil, gas or water production and were
       converted to injection wells at a later date.  The majority of
       the wells were drilled in the mid 1960s to the mid 1970s, with
       most of the injection commencing in the 1970s.

            The annual growth rate of HW wells has gradually declined
       in the past decade.  The average annual growth rate for the
       period from 1972 to 1982 was 6.5% per year.  This is equivalent
       to a projection of 15 new wells for 1984 and 17 for 1985, based
       on the current HW well population of 1^48.  The biggesC yearly
       increases in the well population were found in 1969 and 1973-1975,
       possibly as a result of the implementation of the Clean Water
       Act.

2.8    Users of HW Wells

            The type of industries using HW wells are listed in
       Figure II-5 according to their contribution to the estimated
       total volume injected.  The typical user of wells for injection
       of hazardous waste is a large industry which produces large
       volumes of low concentration waste.  The original financial
       investment is very high and requires continuous operation of
       the well, in most cases, to be economically feasible.
                                 11-10

-------
  or
  <
  UJ
  UJ
  a.
  ID

7 CD
H

s to
&1   I
•H 	1
  LJ
  cn
  CO
  u

-------
        CD
    CO  DO
    -I
    _i  in
    u    .
    I


    CD
U1
 I
u
OH
    CO
    ID
    a
        a
    -J  h-
    LU  a
    u  a
    co  u
    U  U
        en
                    CM
                    CO
                         X
                         in
                         in
                               (M
              CM **

              ™ d
o
%
z
>>^
u.
UJ
cc
                      a
                      cc
                      H-
                      UJ
                      a.
                               11-12

-------
                            m
     en  co
u
3
CD
     U  UJ
         LO
         CD
         LL
     LD
     CO
     ID  _J
     >-  h-
     «l  O
     LU  H
     "*^  ^^
H-  CO
CJ
     CO
     U
        LLJ
     CO
     ID UJ
     Q DO





(M
CD
XN
M
OJ
GO

& MINRLS
«/

LU
I
U

^ORGANIC.

«j£
LU
U
i_
.AGRICULI
(M
O
^
LU
U
_AEROSPA
                cn
             o
             o
                                 Lu
                                 LU
                                 or
                                 _J
                                 a
                                 cc
                                 H-
                                 LU
                                 a.
                                 11-13

-------
            Figure II-5 clearly shows that chemical industries generate
       most of the injected hazardous waste in the  country.   Table I1-4
       gives the distribution of HW injectors  by industrial  category.
       The largest user, E. I.  DuPont,  with 31 HW wells,  alone accounts
       for 1.5 billion gallons per year or 13Z of the total  volume injected.
       Chapter V of this report addresses  the  type  and quantity of hazardous
       waste injected underground.  Figure II-6 gives the percentage of
       wells used by each type  of industry.

2.9    Surface Facilities

            The Office of Solid Waste in EPA has jurisdiction over all
       surface facilities located at HW veil sites.   These facilities
       are regulated under RCRA.

            In April 1984, EPA's Office of Solid Waste released the
       findings from an extensive survey of hazardous waste  generators
       and treatment, storage 'and disposal (TSD) facilities  regulated
       under RCRA in 1981.  Survey results estimated that 4,818 facilities
       treated, stored, or disposed of  hazardous waste in RCRA regulated
       processes.  Hazardous waste storage was the  most prevalent
       management activity regulated under RCRA. Out of  4,818 facilities,
       4,299 were estimated to  have stored hazardous waste,  an estimated
       1,495 facilities treated hazardous  waste and only  about 430
       facilities disposed of hazardous waste.  Eventhough underground
       injection is not a widespread practice  (it is only practiced in
       15 States), it is the method used to dispose  of the largest volume
       of hazardous waste.

            Figure II-7 summarizes the  various surface facilities
       existing at the hazardous waste  underground  injection sites.
       The sum of the various- processes exceeds the total number of
       facilities due to the use of multiple processes at some of
       these facilities.
                                11-14

-------
                           TABLE II-4

               DISTRIBUTION BY INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY
    Industrial
    Category
Organic Chemical

Petroleum Refining
& Petrochemical
Products

Miscellaneous
Chemical
Products

Agricultural
Chemical
Products

Inorganic Chemical
Products

Cornier cial
Disposal

Metals and
Minerals

Aerospace &
Related
Industry

Totals
  Estimated
1983 Injection
 Volume (MGY)
   5,868

   2,888



     687



     525



     254


     475


     672


     169



  11,539 (MGY)
   Percent
   of Total
Annual Volume
     50.86

     25.03



      5.95



      4.55



      2.,20


      4.12


      5.82


      1.47



    100%
                              11-15

-------
 CO
 U
     CO
 3: UJ
 IE h-
§co
ILU
 u
 <
 LL

 LU
 U
  LL.
     CO


     OJ
     a
                                                      a
                                                      oo
                                                       •
                                                      en
             00
             r^
              •
             00
a:
Ui
z
2:
a
a
                                                      ui
   ^»^W^
   OQ ;>>>\Vx\\\-,:^fl j i   i f hVVxXX* <*• •' 1
   m*^$W\  |ii!!!pte^7
   V\N- .\vN >o.v^f i«'. ', n i; 11  i; ?  Mi  rKs>-. x v. J
                        in
                        a
                         •
                        a
                        en
  CO
                                11-16

-------
                              Chapter III

                       Hydrogeolcgic Environment

3.1   Introduction

3.1.1 Geohydrolcgic Considerations

           Knowledge of the regional and site-specific geologic and
      hydrologic characteristics is fundamental to the evaluation of
      the suitability of the site for injection.  These characteristics
      also influence the design, construction, operation and monitoring
      methods chosen for each particular well.  In defining the geologic
      environment, the subsurface rock units are described in terms of
      their litholcgy, thickness, areal distribution, structural con-
      figuration, engineering properties, and potential resource value.
      The chemical and physical properties of subsurface fluids and
      flow systems which comprise the hydrologic environment must also
      be defined.

3.1.2 General Geology

           Geology is the study of the earth and its processes.  The
      rocks of which the earth is composed are described in terms of
      their origin and lithology, which refers to their composition and
      texture.  By origin, rocks are classified as igneous, metamorphic
      and sedimentary.  While nearly all rock types can, under certain
      circumstances, serve as injection zones, sedimentary rocks are
      most likely to have suitable geologic and engineering characteristics.
      Sufficient porosity, permeability, thickness and areal extent are
      needed to permit the rock to act as a liquid-storage reservoir at
      safe injection pressures.

           The folding and fracturing of these rocks is also of concern to
      the well builder.  Structural geologic characteristics on a regional
      and local scale are significant because of their role in influencing:
      1) subsurface fluid flow; 2) the engineering properties of rocks;
      3) the localization of mineral deposits; and 4) earthquakes.  The
      two basic kinds of folds are synclines (downward or trough-like
      folds) and anticlines (upward folds).  Synclinal basins of a
      regional scale (hundreds of miles) are viewed as particularly
      favorable for injection.  Faults are fractures in a rock sequence
      along which there has been displacement of the two sides relative
      to one another.  Faults may act either as barriers or as channels
      to fluid movement.

3.2   Regional Geologic Findings

           Selection of an environmentally acceptable site is critical for
      Class I hazardous waste injection wells.  The choice of an injection

-------
      site begins with an evaluation at the regional level, then is
      narrowed to the vicinity of the site and finally focuses upon
      the immediate well location.

           In general terms, geologic characteristics divide the United
      States into regions.  Synclinal sedimentary basins with thick
      clastic wedges, such as the Michigan Basin and Gulf Coast  (Figure
      III-l), are particularly favorable sites for Class I wells.  They
      contain relatively thick sequences of saltwater-bearing sedimentary
      rocks and the subsurface geology of these basins is well known.
      Vfcere sedimentary rock cover is absent, or thin, these areas are
      generally not suitable for Class I injection wells.  Regions
      shown in Figure III-l where a thick volcanic sequence lies at the
      surface are also usually unfavorable as sites.  To the west, the
      immense and geologically complex Basin and Range Province is a
      series of narrow basins and intervening, structurally positive
      ranges.  Sane of the basins might provide injection sites, but
      their geology is mostly unknown.  The geology of the West Coast:
      is relatively complex in which seme tertiary sedimentary basins
      (that yield large quantities of oil and gas) could be geologically
      satisfactory sites for Class I injection wells.  In general most
      of the HW injection wells are located in either the sedimentary
      basin of the Great Lakes area or the Gulf Coast.

3.3   Local Geologic Findings

3.3.1 Lithological

           To predict the performance of injection wells and their effect
      on the environment, the local hydrcgeolcgical data must be estimated
      prior to well construction, and the actual geologic characteristics
      and values for rock and fluid properties determined during well
      construction and testing.  A wealth of subsurface geologic and engineerinc
      information can be obtained during the drilling and the testing of any
      well.  The extent to which information can be obtained depends on the
      availability of existing data in the immediate vicinity of the well.
      At a site where no wells have previously been drilled within miles, it
      may be necessary to collect all the important information during installa-
      tion of a test boring or well, if feasible.

           In a local site evaluation the geological characteristics of the
      injection zone should be examined.  In this study, the injection zone
      refers to the litholcgic formation or part of formation in which the
      injection occurs.  The desired characteristics of such a zone are:
                                    III-2

-------
                                                               00
                                                               vC
                                                          I
                                                      o
                                                      LU et      «

                                                      z 5    Z

                                                       i  oo
                                                      LU •=>     r.
                                                      I— O
                                                      00 Z
                                                       >-,_;
LU LU OO   .
^       P-
   LU Z^
O t— O   .
I—I >—I »—I  (J
O 00 h-  OJ
O  i  O  c
_1 _l LU  C
o _n  !3
LU LU Z IT.
CO 3 «f

 I
H4
M
                                                      C3
III-3

-------
(1) sufficient thickness, with adequate porosity and permeability
to accept liquid at the proposed injection rate without necess-
itating excessive injection pressures; (2) homogeneous litholcgy
without high permeability lenses or streaks; (3) large enough
araal extant to minimize injection pressure and prevent the
injection fluid fron reaching recharge areas; and  (4) confining
strata with relatively low permeabilities over and under the
injection zone.

     Nationwide, most of the injection wells inject wastes into
sand and sandstone formations (76%) followed by limestone or
dolomite (14.3%) and sandstone shale (9.7%).  The most comionly
used formations for hazardous waste disposal are Mt. Simon (32
wells), Frio (17 wells), Catahoula (14 wells), and Arbuckle (15
wells) located in the Great Lakes and Gulf Coast regions.  .

     Examination of the confining zones is also of importance.  A
confining zone is a formation or a group of formations that immed-
iately overlies the injection zone and separates the injection
horizon from other formations, especially the lowermost underground
sources of drinking water (bottom of 10,000 mg/1 TDS level).  To
provide a good seal against upward or downward flow of fluids,
the confining zone should be sufficiently thick and impermeable.,
Most of these zones are made of shale (42.7%) followed by sandstone
shale (20.8%) and limestone shale (10.0%).  The rest of the
confining zones are made of silt, clay, dolomite and other
impermeable materials.  Both the injection and confining zone
litholcgies are depicted in Figures III-2 and III-3.

      The geologic characteristics of the Great Lakes and Gulf
Coast areas, which contain the highest concentrations of hazardous
waste wells, can be broadly generalized.  These generalizations
can be made with regard to wells in the Great Lakes area due to
the relative honcgenity of the geologic deposits in those States.
Class I hazardous waste wells in the Great Lakes Area typically
inject into 611-foot thick sandstones (Mt. Simon)  or dolomite
lying at an average depth of 2,462 feet.  Confining zones of
shale with seme limestones, dolomite or siltstone  averages 631
feet in thickness.  The bottom of the USDW was separated from the
injection horizon by an average total depth of 2,264 feet.  The
Gulf Coast states also share common geologic characteristics and
therefore, the hydrcgeology can be regionally characterized to a
limited extent.  The injection zone for the Gulf Coast States HW
wells was typically sand or sandstone which averaged 502 feet in
                               III-4

-------
                                    en
                                    LU
CM

 I
I
o
M
tu
       CO
       UJ
       CD
       a
       a
UJ
z:
a
N
       u
       UJ
                                                             LU

                                                             a

                                                             en
                                                             a

                                                             <
                                                             en
                                       III-5

-------
 I
M
OS


O
      CO
      UJ
      CD
      O
      _J
      0
      UJ
o
N

CD
      LL
      z:
      a
      u
                                       UJ
                                 en
                        V'-s^sNvvNv vV'^
                                            gwwwq

                                            ^9^^
                                             '^^x V  V V^V V y  V
                                             v /'s yv. /*»  ^v Xv .'X .>x x^x .- x
                                a
                                in

                                (D
                                      tn
                                      o:
                                      u

-------
      thickness and lie at an average depth of 4,572 feet.  The confining
      zone is predominantly shale with seme clay or marl averaging 990
      feet in thickness.  The average separation between the lowermost
      USDW and the injection horizon is 3,305 feet.

           The average thickness, lithology and formation names for
      injection and confining zones for all hazardous waste wells
      are tabulated by State and presented in Table III-l and III-2.
      The depth to the top of the injection zone averages 4,063 feet
      nationally, and the thickness of the injection interval averages
      556 feet.  The injection zones are separated frcm the bottom of
      the USDWs by an average, nationally, of 2,925 feet.  The confining
      zone thickness averages 928 feet.
3.3.2 Structural
           In addition to litholcgical concerns, the local structural
      geology of the site must be examined.  Generally simple structural
      geologic conditions (i.e., reasonably free of complex folding
      and faulting) and an area of low seismic activity with a low
      probability of earthquake damage are desired.
3.4   Hydrology
           The goal of the UIC program is to protect underground sources
      of drinking water (USDWs).  According to the UIC Regulations
      (40 CFR § 146.03) water containing up to 10,000 ppm total dissolved
      solids (TES) is considered a USDW.  Whenever available, data
      was collected on the depth of both the 3,000 and 10,000 ppm TDS
      isopleths in the course of the Class I well inventory.

           Table III-3 shows the most intensively used aquifers in the
      States in which Class I hazardous waste wells operate.  As expected,
      most of these aquifers are alluvial in nature and locates! at very
      shallow depths.  The depth and thickness of these aquifers are also
      provided whenever possible.

           Figure III-4 compares the average depths of injection zones,
      USDWs, (base of 10,000 mg/1 TDS) and their separations by State
      as computed frcm 178 wells.  The data shows that in most instances
      there is good separation between the injection zone and the base
      of the 10,000 Dpm TDS.  In more than fifty percent of these
      wells this distance is more than 2,500 ft.  There is of course
      greater separation frcm the base of 3,000 mg/1 TDS water, the upper
                                    III-7

-------
 CO



z


 6
1-1
JJ
                                           re
                                           rtJ
JJ

u


I
m

3
w
                                                              Q)
                                                              flJ
          *g
           - co
          CO  CO
          CD  O
          > r-l
          rtJ CO
          U
                                                    §
                                                   5
                                                                        .1
                                                                       CD  r-l
                                                                                        2   -
                                                                                         - C/l
                                                                                       r
                                                                             m co co
                                                                            r-4 CO CT
                                                                            CJ g jj

                                                                         CO  3 O/M
                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                                                 r-t

                                                                                                                                 Cb
                                                                                                 W  *•*
                                                                                                JJ  
CJ)  O C U
^  -4 M 0)


      •tt =
      O M
                                           r
-------
                   CO



                  2


                   s
                  •1-1
                  -U
                  O
                  Du
               0)
                                                 .

                                                  B
"S
 «J
rH
 w
M

 CO
                  I
                             CO
                             CO
 O
•o
 CO
 CO
                                                  CO
                                                  en
                                                 TJ
                                                     °
                                                             CO
               fl)
            - JC
           CO  CO
           CO
S-u
H_l
CO -H ^
OJ CO JJ
Ol 0) O rH
(0 C 0) (0
u .* T-I ;>
0) 0 C !H
5 -H M 0)
H «W C
O HH



CM r-
rH f-
CM rH
rH





rr o CM
vo r> o
a\ r~



                                                                                                   in
5     5
               c —
               O *J
           Qa JJ <— •
       <»  a o
       & H 0)  0)
       (8
              T-I c
           O  C  O
           4J M  N
                  (0
                  -U
                  w
                            ro
              ro
                                   ro
                            a
 CO      O
 CO     -H

•S     6
                                                            (0
                                                            •i-i
                         CO

                         c
                                   ro

                                   in
           CO
           (0
           X
                                                               ro
                                                               V£)
                                                               O
                                                            I
                                                            >-i
                                                            —
                                                                          4J

                                                                          CO


                                                                          "S
                                                                          (0
                                                                          CO
                                                                                  I   I
                                                                                            CO

                                                                                     •  • •-! ®
                                                                                     (o  o I
                                                                                     £ -u -H
                                                                                     CO     rH

                                                                                             I
                                                                                                                        O  CO
                                                                                                                        4J 4J
                                                                                                                            CO

                                                                                                                            I

                                                                                                                           4J
              JC  O
               CO  TD
                                                                                                                        CO "H

                                                                                                                        H  CO
                                                     III-9

-------
cn
g
c
£
cn
CJ
M
So
2
N O
01
O i
H N *H
O
2 -W
h-t -"H
2 J
 -H 5
< *4 O

0)
-U
HJ
JJ
cn
(rt
g
(TJ »
rH CO £
U CO CO

O O -H
in o {N
^
^


CO
(TJ (T3
ra »K C
J3 co ^
IT]
O



co
tn
^
cn
it V>
{^
% "Q
CO
f^ ^J
cn ^
•i-i
» tn
CO
CO
^


u
i en* -P
•f^
» cn
CO
f+ ^t
cn -<

» cn
tn
cn
cn
cn
CO

«,
CQ
to
-H
^
1— «
«
m cn
i— i
O -
cn
- cn
cn
tn
fH

^
r*
"3



cn
*fc
cn in
rH
- CO
rH P-( «•
O J^
T3 tn
1
«>
^H

»•
cn
cn
CO
o

*i
CO
o
o
                                               m
                                                                  8
                                                                  ro
                o
                o
                r-
                                                                               CN

                                                                               "O"
                                                            00
                                                            m
                                                                                                  CN
                                                                            m

                                                                            CN
                                                                                                                  C3
                            (TJ
                                                CO
          u

          o
          r-H
          Cb
                             (TJ
                             •H

                             •a
CO

CO


I
o




I
 (TJ

 (TJ

 cn
•iH


1
                                                                                         CJ
                                                                                        •r-l

                                                                                        s:
                                          a
                                         •^
                                          cn
                                          cn
                                         •i-(
                                          cn
                                          CO
                                                                                                                        in
                                                                                                                        HI


                                                                                                                         cn
                                                                                                                               (fl
                                                                                                                               m
                                                                                                                               x
                                                            111-10

-------
USDW 15* USDW 15
Depth(ft) Thickness
>DW 15 ( Approx.) Feet
3
al*
u O 
ft 1-4 4H
MS 2
1-4 Q w
SB «
p4 u £ jj o
S 2 x a) "i
< O o «) «
3 W -n fa
M « ~-~
^ CM JJ •
2 «• M-l X
t-H ^— O O
Oi 2 -G Vj 03
O H ^ o* QO
o S 2-
s M
a J It! s
U n o a; -4
1 « --
•^ ^J •

*w o O
* 1.1 ~*
Q —
•^
2 §
S 3
V
10 J
JJ <
w
o

(M <"
14
§i§ § •£
•r} -4 g -H nj
K -u c jj a.
JO Jo 5
fa fa *^
0 0 CO
S Pi ^
*



o o o «r
So r~ r-
in H •»
CN -*
V4 C
a] )4 IQ 4) O
c ij c u > ra (utn
O iQrtj M'iH o tU'n
2 au5 ^ a a • c
W jj fl
tn w

« cs <; j j
< < U fa M


H
n
ro
— i
— i
1-1
uS
d) O
4J J-f
0} co
J^
CO W


o
^


o
in


8
J2
ra
2 °
S



o
vc
^

c ^ 9>
nj 1C
•^ -r4  u
> 3 U
-4 -40)
•* — I P
w 3
O O PO
r^ m ^H



o o rn
ao rn mH
•H
S 5
••* -^ £
m > 5
y Is •--
H a; >
a «4 3
*H U-j -4
583

Z c/3 >^
S 1
a a
CM
(0 £
-4 4)
4> DI
o w u
o
o m
O (N
CM
O O
rr in
-4 00

V
* 3
fn Q


in VD ^- o
t-- CM O


O V 1C O
oo m mo
-r -H •»

^ i
•*W - J^ Jj 4J C
1 U il i
p» JM CO O O
CM O TT — t in
*r T — i in

—

f\i m op ^o u"i o
-4 ^o in fNj p* in
^r ro ^r rr
S-l
 14
01 >i -H <8 o:i*jn3 o
(T3 3 ^4 4J 'O '** <3* '**
N ^tn t(C O3 o tfi
c £ ^ 33 (5 **"* cr ™^ tn
5 3CO U*UJ4^
-------
CL
LU
Cf)
a
CO
N
cn

i—
CL
a

LU
CD
a:
u
a
»—i
H-
<
a:
<
a.
LU
a?

Uf
a
<
o:
UJ
                                                               n
a
O)
13

LU
a
<
C£
LU
                         133J NI  HldBO


                           Figure III-4
                               HI-12

-------
      limit of water usually considered useable as a  source of drinking
      water.  This distance is greater than 2,500 ft. in approximately
      63% of the wells in the inventory.

3.5   Other Considerations

3.5.1 Formation Fluid Considerations and Compatibility

           In a local site evaluation, the nature of the formation fluid
      contained within the injection zone ideally must be considered.
      1.) The slow lateral movement of the fluid (with its injected
      wastes) in the injection zone must be assured in order to prevent
      rapid movement of waste away fron the injection site.  2.) The
      formation fluid pressure must be low to normal to limit rates of
      undesirable reactions (e.g., corrosion).  3.) The formation fluid
      should have no apparent econonic value (i.e., not potable, unfit
      for industrial or agricultural use, or not containing minerals in
      economically recoverable quantities).

           The design of an injection well must also (§ 146.15) account
      for injection and formation fluid interactions.  These interactions
      may lead to severe reduction in formation permeability or to a
      loss of structural integrity within the formation itself.  Waste
      and formation compatibility problems are specific to the particular
      formation and waste involved, and the prediction of their compati-
      bility requires site-specific studies.  Specific problems associated
      with compatibility include plugging of the injection formation
      with suspended solids, precipitation and polymerization of the
      waste fluid which reduces permeability , and alteration of the
      injection or confining formation matrix.

           In seme cases, the injection fluid may react directly with
      the rock matrix.  One conmon problem is the swelling of clays
      fron contact with the injection fluid.  Affected clays can signi-
      ficantly reduce the permeability of the formation.  In other
      instances, polar-organic compounds can be adsorbed by the rocks,
      particularly silicates, and can significantly reduce the permeability
      of the formation.

           The injection of acids may result in dissolution of the rock
      matrix.  In the case of certain cemented material, dissolution
      can result in the migration of particles which then block pore
      spaces and reduce the injection zone-permeability.  Dissolution
      of the confining formation can allow the migration of injection
      fluid out of the injection formation.

           To avoid interaction problems, the injection and confining
      formations should have their respective formation fluid and rock
      matrices tested, by column studies for example, for compatibility
      with the proposed injection (or similar) fluid.  Drilling a
                                    111-13

-------
borehole offers an excellent opportunity to collect data froti
drill cuttings, cores, and fluid samples on a number of important
parameters of the formations to be penetrated.

     table III-4 lists the chemical and physical determinations
that may be made for the naturally occurring water in an injection
zone.  The routine determinations characterize the general geo-
chemical nature of the water.  The additional analyses suggested
for an injection zone are for the purpose of predicting the
reactivity of that water with the injection fluid, and would be
selected on the basis of reactions that are suggested by the
chemistry of the two fluids.  Samples of water taken fron shallow
fresh-water aquifers should be analyzed more completely for
minor elements so that their baseline quality is well established
and the presence of any introduced contaminants can be detected.

     In seme cases, compatibility problems can be prevented by
pretreatment of the waste.  The most common pre-injection treatment
used to ensure compatibility is filtration.  This measure was
employed at fourteen of the twenty facilities visited.  Four of
these fourteen facilities did not perform compatibility tests
but practiced filtration only as a precaution against incompatibility.
Of the fourteen facilities, seven also adjusted the pH of the
effluent prior to injection to minimize precipitation of solids.
Three of the seven injected a buffer solution prior to injecting
waste to separate it from the formation fluid in an attempt to
eliminate solids precipitation.  Five of the fourteen also removed
oil or volatiles to avoid lowering the permeability of the injection
formation.  Sane of these facilities employed more than one
measure in addition to filtration.

     The six facilities that did not practice any pre-injection
treatment have concluded, based en tests and/or analyses, that
compatibility exists without treatment.

     This study found that the compatibility of the hydrcgeolcgical
environment as it relates to precipitation appeared to be satisfactory.
However, little information was available concerning other chemical
reactions that can take place in the subsurface environment.  Fran
the available information, there is seme evidence that extreme care
should be taken when injecting acid into a carbonate formation.
The subsequent formation of carbon dioxide frcm the interaction
of the acid with carbonate may interfere with the operation of
the well and may ultimately cause a "blow-cut".  In at least two
facilities  (Cabot in Illinois and Hercafina in North Carolina)
poor operation led to well blow-outs.
                            111-14

-------
                       TABLE III-4

          CCMMCN WATER ANALYSES PERFORMED ON
               SUBSURFACE WATER SAMPLES
(*Warner,  D.C.  and Lehr,  J.H.: An Introduction to the
    Technology of Subsurface Waste water Injection
          EPA-600/2-77-240,  Deceniber, 1977)

Determination
Alkalinity
Aluninum
Barium
Calcium
Chloride
Hydrogen ion(pH)
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Potassium
Sodium
Specific Conductance
Specific gravity
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids
Routine Analysis
X


X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
Injection-Interval
Water Analysis
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
                        111-15

-------
3.5.2 Water Supply Wells

           Another important siting consideration is the dependence of
      the area on ground water.  The number of water wells and especially
      the number of public water supply wells in the area give a good
      idea of the degree of this dependence.  These water wells should
      be inventoried according to their number, depth, type, pumping
      rate, and proximity to the proposed injection well.  These inven-
      tories plus additional data are available on most municipal
      water supply wells.

           The assessment team collected information on the location and
      names of all water well owners within a 5 mile radius (80 square
      miles) of hazardous waste injection wells.  Because this information
      was not regularly required by State agencies in reviewing HW well
      permit applications, it was not readily available. Much of the
      drinking water well information was obtained by identifying
      residences on a county street map or from other indirect sources.

           Table IXI-5 summarizes the data obtained on all Class I HW
      wells as relative to the presence of public and private water
      supply wells within a five mile radius.  The average number of
      water supply wells of all types in the vicinity of injection
      wells are presented for each State,  wherever known, the percentage
      of public water supply wells is provided.

           Though Florida has a greater number of water supply wells
      located within a five mile radius of HW wells than any other State,
      this is primarily the result of one facility where 2,700  wells
      were located within a five mile radius.

           A special note related to this data is warranted.  Much of
      the information collected is inconclusive, and, therefore, seme
      caution needs to be applied when attempting to interpret'this
      data.  Sane data for the wells in the Great Lakes States were
      not available or could not be inferred frcm the information
      obtained.  Other data were, at best, preliminary.

3.5.3 Wells in the Area of Review

           Of concern in considering Class I hazardous waste well siting
      is the presence of any wells which penetrate the proposed injection
      zone within the area of .review (AOR) of a Class I well.  The
      area of review is defined in 40 CFR 146.06 as the zone of en-
      dangering influence in terms of disposal zone hydrology and
      injection well hydraulics.  Federal regulation sets a minimum
      AOR of one-quarter mile radius or the radius resulting from the
      application of a representative physical model.  It is recognized
                                  111-16

-------
                                      TABLE III-5

                       WELLS  IN THE VICINITY OF CLASS  I HW WELLS
Average Number of Water
Supply Wells in 5 Mile
State Radius of Class I Wells
AL
AK
AR
CA
FL
IN
KS
KY
LA
MI
MS
OH
OK
TX
30
0
28
2
2,764
17
-
215
31
7
-
-
5
110
Percent Average Percent of
Manicipal Water Number Wells Abandoned
* Supply Wells* In AOR** Wells in AOR
5
0 24
3
36
0
3
5
0
13 29
2
0
4
0 44
34
.
0
67
30
0
36
60
0
37
100
-
16
93
43
 * These are water wells which do not penetrate  the disposal  zone.

** AOR - "Area of Review",  which is a radius  extending  from the well  bore,  this  radius
   is 1/4 mile at the minimum, but varies fron state to state.

   Only wells penetrating the disposal zone in the AOR  are  included.

(-) - No information available
                       111-17

-------
that individual state agencies may vary in their interpretation,
of "area of review."   Data obtained in this study reflect this
variance.

     Even a properly completed and cemented Class I well can pose a
substantial contamination risk, if there are improperly abandoned
wells or active injection or production wells which penetrate through
confining layers.  An improperly plugged or actively pumping well
can become an alternate avenue for injected wastes diverting
them to an underground source of drinking water instead of the
intended receiving zone.  Table III-5  also presents the average
number of wells in the area of review of HW wells in each state.
Where it could be determined, the percent of abandoned wells are
also presented. This is represented graphically in Figure III-5.
On the average, it appears that not only are there more wells
within the area of review in Oklahoma, but that a great percentage
of them have been abandoned.
                            111-18

-------
in
i
cu
       LLl

       h-
       cn
       LL
       o
       h-
       u
       LU
       CO
       UJ
             o
             in
             CM
in    o   in   o
CM    o   i>   in
ru    CM   -«   ~
in
ca
a
o
in
r>.
o
in
in
OJ
                           31IS/S113M  dO #
                                           111-19

-------

-------
                                  CHAPTER IV

                       WELL CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION
  4.1    Drilling Technology

         Various methods are used to drill injection wells.  The choice
         of drilling method depends upon the purpose of the well, the
         geology of the well site, the character of the formations to be
         drilled, the depth of the injection zone, the availability of
         drilling equipment, and other site-specific factors such as
         total well depth, the lithology of the injection and confining
         intervals, the location of the fresh-water bearing aquifers and
         the location of any possible mineral resources.

         The three major methods used for drilling are the cable-tool
         method, the rotary method, and the reverse-rotary method.  Figure
         IV-1 shows the components of a rotary drilling operation.  This
         method is today the most widely used for drilling injection wells.

  4.2    Well Construction Techniques
                                             »>
4.2.1    Bottcm-Hole and Injection Interval Completion

         Selection of a bottom-hole completion method is an initial step in
         planning a well.  Depending primarily on the geologic characteristics
         of the injection zone, a wide variety of bottom-hole completion
         methods are used, but generally methods can be categorized as those
         applied to competent formations and those applied to incompetent
         formations.  Competent formations include limestone, dolomite,
         and consolidated sandstone that will stand unsupported in a
         borehole.  The most cotmonly encountered incompetent formations
         were unconsolidated sand and gravel that would cave into the
         borehole if not artificially supported.

         The term injection interval completion is used in this context
         to indicate the configuration or device used to allow the fluids
         to exit the tubing and casing to enter the disposal formation.

         Three major types of well completions were found to be utilized
         in the HW hazardous waste (HW) injection wells — open hole (Fig.
         IV-2), screened (Fig.  IV-3), and perforated (Fig. rv-4).

-------
                            Figure IV-1
Swivel
Kelly
Power unit
Controls
Rotary table
                                 Mast
                                Sheave
                                Crown block
Hoisting drum

Mud pump
Hose
                                                              Ground  surface
                                       Settling  pit
                                                    Mud pit
                                 Drill  string
                                  Uncased  hole
                                                              Direction of
                                                              drilling  fluid
                                                              flow
               COMPONENTS  OF THE  ROTARY DRILLING  OPERATION
                                IV-2

-------
               FIGURE'IV-2
o
90 fct hOlt — •!£;

18 in. holt •


12 l/» In, holt — *•

Common ctmtnt —




Undtrr tamtd «
13 3/4 in. holt


.


i?v>
iVJ
J*<
'•ft
v:
$
O^i
•
Vt"
'• •*
1
&
"*•
1
P

*»
*••?
$
•V.
s
% _•
it
&
.**•*' "
!• *» «
•• *• •
***s"
'**"•
':?
,»:*-f
•« »^ '
*;*
*!?*
^
V*
• «* *
I-*
m

feat*
™ w
;>
i »
• .* .
*•* '
Ws
*•*' ^
••' '
• * ^
^


	 B
paa
>



_jf^__
»^es








1

i
\
y,
&

**
^
.'.V
;-';
:•'
••*.
.*;/.
ssa
:• • '{'
o
J
. • **

*.**v
'*•**
•M
ss
:AV;iv
;>.**»y
*•.•• •".•"
.•••.•*
o •
• *
'."?
t* .
* •
'• 4
t'.
^M
-,
"*** V
l^«*
•^
•X**
.\;
/F.*-\
iJ 24 h. ttttl conductor casing







casing




, plastic injtction tubing




' — — Acid-proof ctmtnt
4
1


-*»
INJECTION WELL WITH  OPEN  HOLE COMPLETION
                IV-3

-------
                           FIGURE IV-3
   17  1/2 in. hol«
  Common ctmenf
  12 1/4 in. hole
Diesel-oil-filled  annul us
            Packer
5 1/2 in. injection
scrttn
                                               13 3/8 in. steel casing
                                               9 5/8 in. steel casing
                                               5 1/2 in.  stainless steel
                                               injection  tubing
                                                Acid-proof cement
                                               .Underreamed  16 in. hole
                                                packed  with  20-40
                                                mesn  gravel
         INJECTION WELL  WITH  SCREENED  BOTTOM
                             IV-4

-------
                FIGURE IV-4
1
Common camtnt .



onnulus

i
!?
>••„
"••"
••jf
vV,
*.*•
£;
iii

i

.v
1

••j
•
n
Ml


I
JL
1
Mi
i



I
^
Perforations *i"JI^
i •
> ;
'•"
[•':
1*
?
>;
r
V*
•;
1".
••
••
•*.
?
IT

^
tS
'•«
.^v
r*V*'
'/»
' V
"v
j?;
vj
*j Win, holt
95/8 in stttl casino



plastic tubing


plastic cosing
rJ Acid-orocf ctment
INJECTION WELL WITH  PERFORATED BOTTOM
                   IV-5

-------
       Nationwide, data was obtained for 229 HW injection wells of which
       53 percent were perforated, 18 percent were screened, 27 percent
       were open hole and 2 percent were listed as combinations of
       screened and perforated or open hole and perforated completions
       (Figure IV-5).  Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Arkansas contain
       the majority of the perforated and screened injection wells.
       Ninety five percent of the wells in these States are screened or
       perforated; the remaining five percent of wells are open hole
       completions.  Screened and perforated completions are appropriate
       for the unconsolidated bedrock geology prevalent in these regions.
       Eighty percent of the wells in Ohio, Michigan and Indiana have open
       hole completion, the remaining 20 percent have perforated or
       combination of the two.  These States have the greatest majority of
       open hole completions.

4.2.2  Casing, Tubing and Packer

       The selection of casing size and casing material is determined
       before drilling is begun.  Casing selection is influenced by
       several variables including the setting depth, total diameter of
       the drilled well, formation temperature and pressure, and quantity
       and chemical composition of injected fluid.

       Casing is used to prevent the hole fron caving and to prevent con-
       tamination of underground sources of drinking water by confining
       injection fluids inside.  Many injection wells are constructed
       with more than one string of casing cemented in the hole.  Three
       casing strings are commonly used:  surface string, one or more
       intermediate strings, and long string.  Conductor pipe and liner
       strings may also be used.  The various casing strings are described
       in most injection well technology manuals.

       Casing is installed in stages where there is more than one string.
       Figure TV-6 depicts the various steps in well construction.

       The design of casing used in constructinq an injection well is
       generally based on internal and external pressure on the well,
       axial loading (conpressive and tensile stresses) exerted on the
       well, temperature of injection fluid and well environment, and
       corrosive action of in injection fluids and/or fluids or formations
       surrounding the well.  Any or all of these stresses, if incompatible
       with casing characteristics, can cause failure of the well.
                                   IV-6

-------
                        X
                        in
                                    a
   CO
   z
   a
   h-
   UJ
LO
   a.
   LU
                 UJ
                 0.
                 0
                               IV-7

-------
                        FIGURE IV-6
CASING  AND  CEMENTING  METHODS
1.

_J

JL
R
A
H


•••••


5.

•
•




.
•


i*
w
•

2.
fluid
Drill
Orlll^
Wt
-••
£
J


r
Camont
^•^•••i
;
Float
\

n.
Not
•• ••»*
• 4
4
i
Li
( •«
<«
i.
^
!)
••^
•«
•*
•

•^•B
Bottom
— Cuing
*-Hol«
fluid
rn
central izvrs
•n t««ing
6.

3.

Cosir
^•««

tf»M
S«t
Cantor
Top
plug

7.


Ctmtnt
•9
i^
*
iL


••
•—4

i
M^MM
k
fe



tj

;
4 *
J

fT"~
[ Drill
— pip*
T_ Bottom


4.


£
••
••MB
•••P
^
cr.



mm
iM



£


•^
'

i.
TiT""
» 1
bl
etc
8.
       SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM SHOWING WELL CONSTRUCTION STEPS
                             IV-8

-------
The most cotmonly used material for casing is steel.  The American
Petroleum Institute (API) has developed specifications for numerous
physical requirements/ including minimum yield strength, restricted
yield strength, and chemical characteristics and properties of
casing material.  These specifications are widely used by the
drilling industry.

The corrosion rate of steel casing is highly dependent upon the
environment surrounding the well and the chemical characteristics
of the injection fluid.  Therefore, materials that are highly
corrosion resistant and well suited for such environments are
usually designed into the construction of a well.  Although
many of these materials are quite expensive, their use may
ultimately prove economical, particularly for the bottom-most
strings which contact the injection zone directly.

Plastic casing is also commonly used.  Two major groups of plastic
casing have been developed which are applicable to injection well
completion: thermoset plastic and thermoplastic.  Thermoset
plastics include epoxy and vinyl-epoxy resins which can be rein-
forced with fiberglass.  Thermoplastics, on the other hand, can
be formed and reformed repeatedly by the application of heat
followed by cooling.  Thermoplastics include acrylonitrile-bu-
tadienestyrene (ABS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), chlorinated PVC
(CPVC), and styrene rubber (SR).  The most commonly used thermoset
casings consist of epoxy-resin fiberglass-reinforced material.

With respect to corrosion resistance, thermoset and thermoplastic
materials are uniquely superior to metallic materials, because
they are not susceptible to corrosion by galvanic and electrochemical
effects.  They are also resistant to chemical attack by oil and
water and are unaffected by microbial agents.  However, such
materials may be susceptible to organic solvents such as acetone,
methyl-ethyl ketone, toluene, trichloroethylene, turpentine, and
xylene.  Fibergalss reinforced plastic tubing has been found to be
prone to chemical attack, unless it is coated with a fiber of special
inert polymer.

This study found that HW injection wells utilized several methods
of design and construction and generally involved two or three
strings of casing and one of three conpletion methods.  All HW
wells have a minimum of two strings of casing that combined, extend
to at least the top of the injection zone.

Ninety-five percent of the wells inventoried had data on surface
casing; no data on the casings was available for the remaining
5%.  In the wells with available TDS data, the surface casing is
set to below a depth corresponding to ground-water TDS concentration
of 3,000 mg/1 in 66 percent of the cases and of 10,000 mg/1 in 57%
of the cases.
                            IV-9

-------
Sixty-eight percent of the injection wells were completed with
long string and averaged a depth of 3,585 feet, and 32 percent
were completed with intermediate string and averaged 3,134 feet
deep.

Approximately 35 percent of the active wells that were visited had
three (3) strings of casing:  a surface, intermediate, and long
string.  However, all wells had surface casing and a long string
or intermediate casing.  Seme of the wells did not have the long
string running continuous to the surface, but overlapping to  the
intermediate string.

Most casing was constructed of carbon steel with a minimum yield
strength of 55,000 psi (J-55).  Figure IV-7 portrays the casing
materials used that were found in HW wells.  The casing weights
varied between 14 pounds per foot to 94 pounds per foot.  The
heavier weight casings were found in the surface casing.

The average injection tubing size is 5.5 inches.  Tubing material
varies with specific injected fluids and pressures.  Of the
wells with tubing material information, 66 percent used steel
of various API grades, 13 percent used fiberglass tubing, 10
percent used fibercast tubing, 5 percent used stainless steel
tubing and 6 percent used specialized material tubing.

Of all the wells with information on annular fluid, those using
brine or fresh water with inhibitors were the most cannon.  Other
cannon fluids used include: oil, kerosene and diesel fuel.

Packer

Packers are used at or near the end of injection tubing to  isolate
injection fluids and pressure fron the annulus between the  tubing
and casing.  They serve to "plug" the annulus between
the tubing and the casing.  There are several tvpes of packers
which can resist pressure either frcm the top and botton or only
in one direction.  Generically, there are only two types of "packers"
the mechanical type which actually uses a device to plug the  annulus;
and fluid seals which depend on hydraulically balancing the annulus
fluid column and the usually denser waste fluid column in the tubing,
as in a manometer.
                            rv-io

-------
                          FIGURE   VI-7
             WELL CONSTRUCTION  MATERIALS USED
A:    INTERMEDIATE
      CASING
                                 H-40  05.79X)
                                                      ,K-55 <10.531)
                                                          .A-53 (2.63X)

                                                           .N-80 <2. B3X)

                                                           .FIBRGLASS (2.631)
                           J-55 (85.791)
                      H-5S  (2S. 93X>
                                                 FIBRCLASS (II. 11Z)
                                                        ,H-40 (7. 41X3
B:    LONG STRING
      CASING
                                                           .A-53 (3. 70X)


                                                           .N-80 (3. 70S)
                                                 (48. 152)
                              FIBERGLASS <13»
C:    INNER TUBING
                                                      IBERCAST  (10«
                                                          SPECIAL MATERIAL(6Z>
                                                            .STAINLESS STEEL <5X>
                       ITEQ. CASING (MX)
                             IV-11

-------
        Information on 72% of the wells indicates that ninety-three
        percent (93%) use some type of mechanical packer.  In the visited
        facilities, most wells use a mechanical packer between the long
        string casing and the injection tubing.  Others use a fluid
        seal in the tubing/long string annulus.  Figure IV-8  shows this
        type of completion with fluid seal.  Packers were reported to be
        of the conpression, tension, or other mechanical types; of various
        sizes and materials (stainless steel, zirconium, carbon steel);
        and of several brands and models.  Most of these packers are set
        at the bottom of the long string casing.  Seme are set at various
        depths up to 400 feet frcm the bottom of the tubing.
4.2.3   Cementing
        Cement is applied between the outer walls of the casing and the
        borehole or other casing.  The major functions of the cement are
        to restrict movement of fluids between the surface and the sub-
        surface or between different strata in the subsurface, to support
        the casing, to prevent pollution of underground sources of drinking
        water, and to prevent casing corrosion.

        The selection of cement and cement additives is based on depth,
        temperature and pH conditions of the injection or formation
        fluids.  Many different compositions of cement are available to
        meet the particular specifications that are needed to comolete
        the well.  The additives selected are valuable in controlling the
        rate of setting of the cement, in changing the density and strength
        of the base cement, in limiting slurry loss to formations, in
        reducing cost, and in increasing resistance to corrosion.

        The most common cement used in well completion is Portland cement.
        Two important criteria in selecting a cement are ccmpressive
        strength development and thickening time.  These, as well as
        other necessary properties and characteristics of cements, can be
        obtained through blending specialty cements or by the addition
        of specific cement additives.  Several specialty cements and
        cement additives have been developed to achieve certain properties
        or alter basic characteristics of standard cement classes.

        Information obtained from 67 percent of the active wells indicates
        that 90 percent of these wells have their surface casing fully
        cemented.  The intermediate casing is fully cemented in 98 percent
        of the cases and the long string in 88 percent.  In all cases,
        cement is applied in at least one string, from the surface to
        below the base of the USDWs and at the confining zone above the
        injection zone.
                                   W-12

-------
                               FIGURE IV-8
Monitoring fluid
16 in. ttetl
pip«
 FLUID FILLED
 ANNULUS
 Cement
Electrodes
Casing shoe
Open  hole
                                      T7/>>/^>x^>/^^
Bottom of well
                                           Wostt pickle  liquor inlet
Ground elevation
          — Glacial drift
                                                  7in. steel pipe
                                                   4 1/2 in fibercast tubing

                                                    7 in. alloy pipe
                                                    Disposal  zone
                                                    Total  depth  4,291 ft.
        INJECTION  WELL  WITH OPEN ANNULUS COMPLETION
                                IV-13

-------
4.3  Corrosion Control

     Corrosion is the transformation of a base-metal material to a more
     stable component, such as an oxide, by a chemical or electrochemical
     reaction.  Corrosion also refers to other types of degradation
     such as the dissolution of plastic materials by organic solvents.

     In injection wells, corrosion can occur inside the tubing, casing,
     and well head equipment due to contact with the iniection fluids.
     External corrosion of the casing is caused by the soil or water-
     in which the well is placed.  All facilities visited practice
     seme form of corrosion control.  The most prevalent practice by
     far is the use of corrosion resistant materials.  Each facility,
     in addition to protecting with selected materials, also uses an
     annular fluid that inhibits corrosion inside the well casing.

     Seven of the facilities visited neutralize their waste streams
     to sane degree.  This is usually to ensure compatibility with
     the injection formation, but it also has the effect of lowering
     the corrosiveness.  Nine facilities either iniect fluids that
     are relatively neutral, or inject into a formation that neutralizes
     the fluid.  The remaining two facilities** have had seme difficulties
     that are clearly the result of corrosion even though they both
     used corrosion resistant materials.  Kaiser Aluminum in Mulberry,
     Florida, and BASF in Holland, Michigan, both have very acidic
     injection fluids that have corroded well casings so much that
     portions have broken off..  Vfaile both facilities have repaired
     their wells, the following illustrates what can happen:

         "Kaiser does not adjust the pH of their extremely acidic
          waste stream that is injected into a limestone formation.
          The acid is neutralized in the formation as it causes a
          cavity in the limestone.  It is believed that injection
          fluid caused some of the supporting rock to dissolve
          away fron the bottom of the casing.  The casing has been
          found to leak (probably as a result of corrosion), and
          when cament was squeezed into the annulus to stop this
          leak a large portion of the well casing and packer broke
          off.  The repaired well is now protected below the packer
          and casing by diesel oil that was injected.  There is
          evidence, however, that'corrosion also occurred higher
          up on the casing.  Isolating the casing fron the injection
          fluid has stopped the corrosion process."*
     *  Fran the site report on this facility as revised  for  clarity.
    **  Twenty facilities were visted however two of  these were
        subsequently found to be non-hazardous facilities.
                                IV-14

-------
       Ttoo facilities in Texas, Gibraltar and Monsanto, have samples of
       their casing material that are exposed continuously to the waste
       stream at a location that is accessible above ground.  These
       "weight-loss" specimens provide a warning of corrosion at an
       early stage.

       None of the facilities visited practice cathodic protection
       to decrease the corrosion potential of their injection wells.
       Even though cathodic protection is not used, corrosion control
       practices on the whole appear to be sound.  However, the cannon
       practice at a few of these facilities has been to rework an
       injection well only after leaks are detected.

  4.4  Mechanical Integrity of Injection Wells

4.4.1  Requirements

       In developing regulations to prevent pollution of underground
       sources of drinking water (USDWs) as mandated by Part C of the
       Safe Drinking Water Act, EPA developed the concept of "pathways
       of pollution."  These pathways refer to the different ways by
       which underground injection can pollute USDWs.  The basic principle
       is that if one can control these pathways, no pollution would
       occur.  Two of the most important potential causes of USDW pollution
       are: breaches in the casing, tubing, and packer; and fissures,
       channels, or insufficient or total absence of cement in the space
       between the borehole walls and the casing.  The mechanism put in
       place in the Underground Injection Control (UIC) regulations to
       control these pathways of pollution is known as the mechanical
       integrity test (MIT) requirement.

       The term mechanical integrity is used in injection well
       technology to indicate that a facility has sound operational
       components (and by inference does not allow fluids to contaminate
       or to cause to contaminate underground sources of drinking water).
       With the advent of the Underground Injection Control program,
       mechanical integrity requirements for all UIC facilities were
       further defined.  In general, operators of all Class I wells have
       to show during construction and prior to start of operation and at
       least every five years thereafter that their wells have mechanical
       integrity.  The mechanical integrity requirement under the UIC
       program is twofold,and in accordance with the "pathways" mentioned
       above.  The UIC technical regulations under 1) 40 CFR §146.08 (b)
       define the tests which are acceptable to demonstrate that "there
       is no significant leakTn the casing tubing or packer";  and 2)
       40 CFR §146.08 (c) defines acceptable tests to demonstrate that
       "there is no significant fluid movement into an underground
                                  17-15

-------
       source of drinking water through vertical channels adjacent to
       the injection well bore,"

       The first requirement concerns the integrity of all the
       tubular goods.  The second requirement concerns the effect of
       the drilling of the well through the different strata and especially
       the naturally occurring "confining" or impermeable zones between
       aquifers.  VJien the well is drilled/ a conduit is created for
       cotmunication between the different strata, and unless an adequate
       cementing program is followed, movement of fluids could occur from
       the injection zone into other formations or between formations
       penetrated by the well.  In both cases, such movement can result
       in the degradation of an underground source of drinking water by
       either the injection fluid or formation fluids of lesser quality.
       Figure IV-9 depicts the injection well with a leak through the
       casing and fluid movement through a vertical channel.

       The acceptable tests which are required before injection begins
       are shown in Table IV-1.  They are divided into two categories:
       1) test required before the casing is installed; and 2) test
       required after the casing is installed and cemented".  Additionally,
       EPA has recommended that all such tests for HW wells be witnessed
       by the regulatory agency (State or EPA).  The acceptable mechanical
       integrity tests which are required periodically during the life
       of the well are shown in Table IV-2.  They are divided into two  *
       categories:  1) tests to prove that there are no leaks in the
       tubular goods and the packers; and 2) tests to Drove that there
       is no movement of fluids along the borehole.

       Table IV-3 shows the applicability of tests that may be used for
       mechanical integrity verification.  Other specific and technical
       information on the different types of MITs can be found in EPA
       technical assistance manuals and EPA guidance documents.
4.4.2  Findings
       Information on the tests done at the wells to confirm mechanical
       integrity was obtained frcm state files almost exclusively.
       Several problems developed during the data gathering effort.
       One problem was that in most cases the files contained only
       information on the tests done during the construction of the
       well.  Another problem was that since each service company has
       proprietory names for the test they do, it was difficult to
       assess which tests were done, and in fact, what they tested for.
       This latter problem was made more acute since several mechanical
       integrity tests (logs) have more than one application.

       The possible reason for the incomplete information found in the
       files is that delegation of the UIC program took place recently
                                  rv-16

-------
                  FIGURE IV-9
•EJECTED FLUID
                                    CASING
     CONFINING ZONE
 — INJECTION  ZONE
                                           CEMENT

                                                FORMATION


                                               LEAK THROUG
                                                 HOLE IN
                                               CASING
                                        CASING
                                        r- CEMENT
                                              FORMATION
                                                 FLUID
                                                 MOVEMENT
                                                 THROUGH
                                                 VERTICAL
                                                 CHANNEL
                                                 IN ANNULU
   Schematic "Diagram Showing Lack of Mechanical Integrity
                   IV-17

-------
















t— I

a
1






























§
M
gs
5?
Q
CJ
££
g
a
CzJ
a
M
U

ca
CD

8

%
"













•9 2
w 3 Q*
8 £S£
S~j- *«^
•i-4
•i-( JJ FT. •*••
JJI «• i-t CN
•** 5 >~
01 Q JJ T3
fO T3 j2 -»H —
O 35 w CN
4J JJ C -1
U C CO)*
jj s c ^«
<; o cj o vi





§ 9
(U i-J «—•
jj C . fO ClJ
w jj o —
ftj '^ F^ *••*
O > — —
U W C -1*
O — H CO W 	 •
>*-l W JJ CT--»
0) 
4J —
W W —
57 c CN
0  3J OS •*-•
1JJ JJ IhJ E
C 3 U <4

335 U •<»• J3
O ai »— •**
o a —
fl3 T5 S FTl «»^
L 2 5 Q •*
BJ 03 jj P-J •—





W TJ
gig
(T3 > — .
JJ JJ O ^
Is35
w u to •*«
O rn-**
" a ° X
JJ ^^ ^
•1-4 »H >.«—
> «J 
low
M f— ^ in
,s
JJ •<->
"* JJ
U 03
8s B
JJ O
C >4-l
•i-l
•
o 57

-------
           *
           •)C
           *
*
*
                              CU
                                                            4J  0) T3
                                                            CO T3  C
                                                            0)  
                                                            jj  CD  CU
                                                            O TJ  &
                                                                        0
                                                                        JJ

                                                                        CD
CN
(X
X
H
M
Cu
g
M
^
^J
w
JJ
2
a
s

£
Q
CU





CO
1— 1
rH
£

rg
£

M
cn
cn
03
cH
O

£
M y TJ
3 O C
CO 03
CO TJ
cu f« —*
a§-
t^ w ^""
CO rH 2
rH £ CO
3 ±) 0
C -iH •
S 3 ^o
< ^f
CO rH
14-1 4J C^l
O CO
CU CK
?4J Cti
0
•rH CU
U SJ 0
O3^
4J CO •— ' .
• H CO r^
c cu co — »
0 U 
•iH iH
 3 0
rH £
u-i cu
    u
 o o
2 J2
                                                                                                 (X
                                                                                                 "8
                                                                                                 03
                                                                                      u
                                                                                      cn


                                                                                      J8
                                                                                      c
                                                                                      03
                                                                                      O

                                                                                      3
                                                                                      CO
                                                                                      cu
                                                                                                   
-------
a
S
M
t_i

>i on
i— i O
j
M fc
03 C
la
o2 £«
cu H

Q
OT

CU *5
M
cn


(Q CO
CU CU
>. >.





j
U £$
M G

co co
cu cu
^^1 ^"
1
MM
y
* S
2 is
o cc
S M a
L^ ^H
ca < <
03 O Gb
^^
* M tj
Jg Q£ M
H §
IH §
HH f"4
|| |
i— i
£ S

>H ca
3 3
M CJ
S M
o Q
5*
o§
M M
3 i
fe 03
jj
a

J
cu

cu
en
)»4
cu

O O
c c




i i




ll
o **
2 O
^^
cnS
^ M
2 m
u S
A t^ C«4
o
JJ
nj
vj
i— i
o o


OJ
^
cu
cn
CU
u
"2 cu


en cn
ft ft


C*j
H^
^1
cu
Oi CU
< S-i
en
cn
2
cu
en
CO 3

m C
« 5
en JJ
05 -^
CU C
Ou S

^
en
ft






CO
cu
>,




CO
CU




CQ





CQ
ft




en
s,









S

perature
g


CN
en
£






en
^




CO
cu




CO
ft




cn
ft




CO
ft











s
13
•l-l
§


CQ
ft






CU
>•


*••*,
i£.
cn
^
_
in
>~'
CO
CU




cn
ft




cn




«•"••*
^J*
*$?
Q
^
Trace

ioactive
T3
S

(N
en







en
^


^M^
m
cn
^
^_
C"O
*—
en



m

O


^~*
C2
i








~
i

0)

o


en
cu






en
cu
>


^•^
m
O
C
^^
n
^"

O


m

0


^"**
C
o
c









••a1

S
u
i— !
3



8






cn
>•


<— s
d
O
C
^^
f*^
*^

g


«
^^
en
ft

^^
rH
*-*
cn
ft






5

i
g
jj
•i-t
CJ
cn
3












•
CD
jj
H3
cr
cu
T3
^0
rtj

•$
c
>
<0
s
cn
o
jj
i
1
a
* s
"C f3
CD rr
i^jj
JJ ro
CQ .C

CO CU

Q
jj cn
cn
m cu
JJ jQ

Mi ^^
*»H fO
s* CU
cn cn
£1

cn
CU CU
o tj
§^
*— s ^^
rH CN




•
8
cn
S

en en
CU «3
•i o
Q
fO rtj
c cu
{Q C
(i\
cn .a
jj
a 8
CQ

0 •«•<
•-H cn
8*t3
u °
W O
o 5
•
c? ^ "01
o u u
JZ JJ £
cn cn JJ
> c •n
J2 -^ cu
cu % -S
•^4 ("T
cn <
CU d)
cu u jQ
u
3 U-l C
^ O 03
•i-( O
OS r-l
U_l 03 U
Bcu
o
ftj w •
o 5 ^
a-^ cn
3 cn
cu cu
JJ TJ 0
(T3 CU CJ
o cn  >^H
-— * -^ ^— ^
n •v in
                                      17-20

-------
in most States.  Their underground injection control program prior
to delegation may not have had requirements for MIT which paralleled
the Federal program.  As the states implement the Federally mandated
UIC program their MIT program will become more structured.

During the design and construction stage of an injection well,
emphasis is placed on the structural integrity and operational
soundness of the well.  This is because of the large investment  in
the drilling of deep wells.  Therefore, most of these wells have
a very thorough testing program to ensure their structural and
operational soundness (as discussed above).  In many cases, the
tests done to assure that the well is properly supported (structural)
and that it can be pressurized (operational) will also determine
whether the well has mechanical integrity and the USDWs are
protected.  In all the sites surveyed, a number of MITs were
done during construction of the well.  The most camion are pressure
tests, cement bond logs and caliper logs.  Other fairly common
tests done during construction include temperature, density,
neutron logs and radioactive tracer surveys.  Table IV-4 gives
the breakdown by categories and applicability of the MITs for
each site visited.  Another consideration which is very important
in the determination of the degree of protection of USDWs is the
extent and effectiveness of cementing the well casing.  In all the
sites visited, it was found that sane type of a test (cement
bond, 3D Velocity, temperature) was run to confirm the soundness
of the cementing job.  These findings indicate that at least in
the facilities visited, cementing practices are adequate to
protect USDWs.

Another major test in determining the degree of protection of
USDWs is the assurance that there is no potential for the escape
of injection fluid through leaks in the casing tubing and packer.
This consideration is addressed in all the wells surveyed
either at the time of construction or as the result of corrective
action.  In most cases, the potential for leaks was investigated
by doing pressure tests and by running caliper and microcaliper
logs and Radioactive Tracer Surveys (RATs).  Periodic pressure
tests and RATs are most effective in these circumstances, however
caliper logs are not recommended unless the breach is significant.

The two States which have started to implement a periodic
MIT program have chosen to use the RATs test to determine the
presence of channels in the cement.  This test is extremely
useful to determine any upward movement of injection fluid from
the injection zone and to determine leaks in the injection string.
The use of RATs to determine the absence of channels in the
cement outside the casing is not effective in all cases, however.
                           IV-21

-------
B      ;
M      •«






en
i— *
I
C 4J

JM fl)
* u i
!i o °
jj lu CD

en en *J
•^ jj
> en c
en £-*
CD
•r-l
•l-l
rH
• •»•>
M en
S £>


S
i^
M

1









5


2
jj
(^
Ll

|


en
jj
LI en
O jj
S CD
10 Li
83
Li en
O CD
£ CL

C"S
•"* CO
rH Ql



tJ
> fa
M
^
.§ |
(J (B
(g S*




#0^
m
^^
^^
ff
i— i

5 Li
O 3
jO -u
«J
JJ U
C GJ
rtj tij
5 5
CJ 4J




CN ro

^9 ij
CD Li
rH U 0
ft} <4J
en p
fH H •"•
*""' s
5 ^ <43
•H tt
Li JJ >-*
O 0
M-l <3 >
0 CD
C T3 U
2 (2 5

1^

Ll
CD

VD








81
P^

!•
_§

jj
c
1









f^i
en
CD
JJ

2
3

£ 5


X
^
^
4J
a

c
n
jS en
ni
jj o
C »H
CD
S O
CJ Li
JJ
- 3
88
3
Jj »
«3 >
Li JJ
i*'i
aj CD






W
£-4
^
JJ
- en
0 jj
^.^
CD
Li Li
c. en
•r* at
^ CD
(Q Li
o a
h- 1
U
S'


> 5

S ^
11 3

prj
2
o
JQ

4J
c

o

CD*
Ll
3
jj
Li
&
f.81

en
81
r-l
^^
(fl CT
en c
cu — ^
_g -Q
O JJ
JS ^
JJ JJ
en
gy XJ

u 2
S. w
•H w
_i CD
m LI
cj a,



i— i

|
3
CD
Li
3
JJ
(Q
£
fll
U>
I

»
m
_g

jj
CD CO
O ^


6
Ll
O
's en
.81
ns -H
Li
CD O
Q *H
?3 c
O 0
en
CD
"O L?

Q 13
c2 o
g
I)
CD
JJ
en

1
^•^
c
1— 1
                                                                                                                                           JJ
                                                                                                                                           X
                                                                                                                                           CD

-------
    "8
     CO
     CO
     
rH -rH
-08
C rH
Q CU
I*

JJ **
c m
CJ ^
2
CO
CO «—
CU rH
Ll rH
0, CQ
ta.
CO Ol
t^ 0
0? ^
^ 8
Ll rH
rHC?
3-



CD
jj
(C

J^
§











81
rH

Q
J^

JJ
CU
CJ
JJ
CO
i a
rH ff
rH -5
 CO
O rH
JO ^
^j
jj 4J
C -rH
CO CQ
CO CU
CJTJ




^
ro
L^
,^
OM
^
JJ
CO
rH
CU
co a
CO -«H
CU rH
& «3
& u


2
8
rH
rH
CU
I?











S1
rH
2
3
JJ

-------
EPA will define the applicability of the RATS test  in  the  near
future through an ongoing research effort.

Three facilities visited have not performed any UIC or UIC related
mechanical integrity tests within the last five years  according
to plant records.  Although these facilities are not out of
compliance with State permits, they need to upgrade the operation,
including periodic MITs, to fulfill the requirements of yet
unissued UIC permits.  These facilities are Inland  Steel Company
in East Chicago, Indiana; BASF Wyandotte Corporation in Holland,
Michigan; and Sohio Chemical Company in Lima, Ohio.  Of the
fifteen facilities that have performed mechanical integrity
tests, four have tested within the last five years, three  test
every two years, and two test annually.  The remaining six
facilities have performed mechanical integrity tests less  than
one year ago of which the following two are included:

     1.  Chemical Waste Management (CWM) in Vickery, Ohio, had
         mechanical integrity tests run on all six  of  their
         injection wells late in 1983 bv order of the  State of
         Ohio as a result of leakage detected during a recent-
         inspection.  All of the six wells were found  to be
         leaking and were shut down.  Five of the wells have
         subsequently been worked over and put back into operation.
         The fate of the sixth well is yet to be determined.  CWM
         was fined 12.5 million dollars for these and  other violations
         by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

     2.  Chemical Resources, Inc. (CRI), of Tulsa,  Oklahoma, ran
         mechanical integrity tests on its one injection well
         early in 1983 and found the casing to have many holes
         and a deteriorated packer.  The well was completely
         reworked and will have mechanical integrity tests performed
         on it every six months.  There is on-going legal  action
         against CRI by the State.

It is worth noting that at all the sites, which have had problems
in the past related to underground injection, the problems were
either identified or confirmed by the performance of mechanical
integrity tests.  The requirement for MITs under  the UIC regulations
thus appears to be the most effective tool in identifying  the
potential for pollution of USDWs as a result of underground
injection.
                            TV-24

-------
                               Chapter V

                         Waste Characteristics
5.1    Introduction

            Operators of Class I HW wells are required to monitor the
       characteristics of the injected fluids with sufficient "frequency
       to yield representative data of their characteristics."
       (40 CFR §146.13(b)(l)).  In most of the cases the State establishes
       the parameter for which it requires the permittee to test.  Not
       only do the parameters vary from state to state, but so does
       the degree of detail in the testing.  This is reflected in the
       kind of waste characteristics information which was obtained
       from state files and the subsequent verification effort.  In
       general the information obtained for the waste characteristics
       is not specific enough to be amenable to classification by
       compound, rather it is only adequate to be treated under generic
       headings (see Section 5.2 below).

            Much of the waste is pretreated before being injected.
       This study indicates that the large majority of HW operations
       use seme type of physical or physical-chemical process to
       remove suspended solids prior to injection.  Many also treat
       the fluids by adjusting their pH.  This is done to avoid pre-
       cipitation and other undesirable chemical reactions in the
       injection zone and in the well itself.  The process generally
       guarantees that the injected fluids will be compatible with
       formation fluids and with each other.  Waste streams may also
       be blended prior to injection.  The most common treatments were
       found to include sedimentation, disinfection, filtration, oil
       and grease removal, neutralization and dilution.

5.2    Waste Classification

            For the reasons indicated above, wastes have been classified
       as acids, heavy metals, organics, hazardous inorganics, non-
       hazardous inorganics and "other".  Acids are either inorganic
       or organic liquids with a pH either equal to or less than 2.0.
       Heavy metals include waste streams which have concentrations of
       arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury or nickel.
       Organics consist of those componds which contain carbon. Hazardous
       inorganics include selenium and cyanide.  In addition to the
       hazardous components, many non-hazardous inorganics are injected
       with the waste stream.  The non-hazardous inorganics category
       generally includes those inorganic compounds not classified in
       the above categories.  There was a small amount of overlap

-------
       between the organic and the acid categories.  The "other" category
       includes fluid wastes reported and identified by their chemical
       oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total
       suspended solids (TSS).  Because of the lack of specific information
       these were assumed to be hazardous.

5.3    Distribution of Waste Types

            Data was conpiled on the waste characteristics of 108
       hazardous waste injection wells.  With this information on
       over half of the HW wells currently in operation, the total
       volume of undiluted hazardous waste for all 181 HW injection
       wells active in 1983 was extrapolated.

            Utilizing their annual flow volumes and waste concentration,
       it was found that during 1983 the 108 wells disposed a total of
       228,021,900 gallons of non-aqueous* waste with 6.2 billion gallons
       of water.  Forty-eight percent (109,342,200 gallons) of this
       non-aqueous waste was hazardous, while the remaining 52% (118,679,700
       gallons) was nonhazardous inorganics**.  Of the non-aqueous
       hazardous waste, acids account for 41.27% by volume, organics
       for 36.27%, heavy metals for 1.39%, hazardous inorganics for
       .08%, and "other" for 20.99%.  This data is listed in Table v-1
       and graphically depicted in Figures V-1 and V-2.
        *>
            To extrapolate the volume of non-aqueous hazardous waste
       injected down all 181 HW wells active in 1983, the total volume
       of 11.5 billion gallons injected in 1983 (estimated in Table II-2)
       is utilized.  Then a ratio is set up between the total estimated
       volume injected down the 108 wells in 1983 and the volume of
       actual non-aqueous waste injected down.  This ratio is compared
       to the total volume of 11.5 billion gallons injected in all
       the 181 wells, and the volume of non-aqueous waste disposed in
       the 181 wells is calculated fron there.

            It was found that an estimated 423,000,000 gallons of
       non-aqueous waste was deposited down the 181 HW wells.  Utilizing
       the percentages of waste components found in the 108 wells, it
       can be estimated that 220,000,000 gallons (52%) of the non-aqueous
       waste was nonhazardous and that 203,000,000 (48%) was hazardous.
       The non-aqueous hazardous waste can be further broken down:  83,800,000
       gallons were acids; 2,800,000 were heavy metals; 73,600,000
       were organics; 200,000 hazardous inorganics; and 42,600,000
       "other".

5.4    Concentration of Waste Stream Components

            Table V-2 lists the individual waste components classified


 *  This is the waste stream devoid of water
**  It should be emphasized that under RCBA regulations the whole volume
    injected is considered hazardous waste.

                                  V-2

-------
                             TABLE V-l

            WASTE CHARACTERISTICS OF 108 HW WELLS ACTIVE

                    IN 1983 IN THE UNITED STATES
Waste Type
Acids
Heavy Metals
Organics
Hazardous
Inorganics
Gallons
44,140,900
1,517,600
39,674,500
89,600
Percent
of Total
Gallons
20.26
.70
17.40
.04
Pounds
367,250,000
12,626,100
330,090,000
745,800
Well
Count
35
19
71
4
  Non-Hazardous
  Inorganics

  Other

       TOTAL
  (non-aqueous)
118,679,700     52.04


 22,964,600      9.91

228,066,900    100.35
  ACTUAL TOTAL     228,021,900    100.00
(minus overlaps e.g. "organic acids")
987,410,000     50
191,070,000
33
                                V-3

-------
w
OS


UJ
t
r~-
CO
<
3:
cn
ID
Q
LU
ID
a
<







CO
ID
O
a
rv
<
N
<
H







/-\
>«
(T)
C\J
•
r-*
«H
>•/
cn
u
>~i
z
s ^
§ ^


/^
X
«-*
O)
•
o
>»/
ct:
LU
»-
a
~>^
/^
^L
M^
^^\
m^
~ o
X
a o
t^ **
d u
^ a:
a
cn z
_i >-»
<
j- cn
LU =3
z a
a
>- cr
> <
< M
111 <
X X
_ll
	 f




y

$
X

X
      a  a
      uj  a
      LL  01
      a  ID
          a
      :z  a
      ^  o:
      a  <
      a  N
      :*:  <
      <  IE
      UJ
01
a
>-«
u
                                     a
      CD
                                      v-4

-------
CM
 I
w
OS

o
        LLJ
        h-
        01
        N
        <
        I

        01
        Z)
        a
        UJ
        ID
        a
       o
       LLJ
       I
       LJL
       a
       o
       a
       LiJ
       C£
       CD
                                               OD
                                              /-O
                                              X  .
                                              00
                  O
                 012
                                              M/)
O)
O)
 •
o
CM
                                              3D
                                               a
X

-------
                            TABLE 7-2

        HW WELL WASTE STREAM CCMPCNENTS AND CCNCENTPATICN

                   IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1983
Waste Stream
    Type

Acids
Heavy Metals
Organics
Hazardous
Inorganics
      Waste
   Conponents

Hydrochloric Acid
Sulfuric Acid
Nitric Acid
Formic Acid
Acid, unspecified

Chronium
Nickel
Metals, unspecified
Metal Hydroxides
  unspecified

Total Organic Carbon
 (TOG)
Phenol
Oil
Organic Acids
Organic Cyanide
Iscpropyl Alcohol
Formaldehyde
Acetcphenone
Urea "N"
Chlorinated Organics
Formic Acid
Organic Peroxides
Pentachlorophenol
Acetone
Nitrile
Methacrylonitrile
Ethylene Chloride
Carbon Tetrachloride

Selenium
Cyanide
   Incidence of
Injection by wells

       15
        6
        2
        2
       12

       11
        5
        2  .
        1
       24

       22
        6
        3
        3
        3
        2
        2
        2
        2
        2
        2
        2
        2
        1
        1
        1
        1

        2
        2
   Average
Concentration
	(mg/1)

   78,573
   43,000
   75,000
   75,000
   44,900

      1.4
      600
    5,500
    1,000
   11,413

      805
    3,062
   10,000
      400
    1,775
   15,000
      650
    1,250
   35,000
   75 ,,000
    4,950
      7.6
      650
      700
       22
      264
      970

       .3
      391
                               7-6

-------
       as either acids, heavy metals,organics,or hazardous inorganics.
       Hydrochloric acid was the most frequently injected acid, while
       chroniura was the most common heavy metal, and phenol the most
       cannon organic.  Acids were,by far, the most concentrated
       components of the waste streams.  The average hydrochloric acid
       concentration was 78,573 mg/1., followed by nitric and formic
       acid at 75,000 mg/1., and sulfuric acid at 43,000 mg/1.

5.5    Distribution by Waste Codes

            With the inception of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
       Act (RCRA), a system of codes was introduced corresponding to the
       various types of hazardous waste.  The hazardous waste codes are
       used to identify individual conpounds, hazardous characteristics
       and specific process wastes.

            Hazardous waste codes were obtained for wastes injected in
       84 wells active in 1983 contained within 47 facilities.  In
       general, assessment of distribution by waste codes was limited
       by the fact that complete information identification of RCRA
       codes and amounts injected was available on only 51 of the
       wells. The most frequently reported hazardous waste codes are
       listed in Table V-3. In the first column, where quantitative
       information on the injection volumes was absent, the applicability
       of the codes is ambiguous.  The.codes either refer to the wastes
       generated or to wastes injected but of unknown volume. The wells
       listed in the second column are those which are known to have
       definitely injected wastes identified by RCRA codes.  Based upon
       incidence of reported hazardous waste codes alone, corrosive
       waste (D002) was the most conmonly encountered RCRA waste.  The
       next most prevalent type of wastes were ignitable wastes (D001),
       followed by reactive wastes (D003) and spent pickle liquor
       (K062) fron steel finishing operations.
5.6    Section 201(f) of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments

            The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 are specif-
       ically concerned with the disposal of dioxins and solvents
       (RCRA codes F020-F023 and F001-F005).  Forty-five months after
       the date of enactment of this Amendment the disposal of these
       wastes "is prohibited unless the Administrator determines the
       prohibition of one or more methods of land disposal of such
       waste is not required in order to protect human health and the
       environment for as long as the wastes remain hazardous."  Of
       the wells which reported RCRA codes (only 84 of the 181 wells
       active in 1983), none reported disposing dioxins.

            Eight wells reported the solvents with RCRA codes F001,
       F002, F003, F004, F005.  More specifically F001 and F002 are
       spent halcgenated solvents and F003, F004, and F005 are spent
                                  V-7

-------
                  Organics, unspecified      14               13,107
                             TABLE V-3
      ELEVEN MOST FREQUENTLY REPORTED HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES
 IN RCRA INVENTORY OF HW WELLS ACTIVE IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1983

                                           Incidence of      Incidence of
Hazardous Waste
Disposal Code
D002
D001
D003
D007
K062
Waste
Identity
Corrosive
Igni table
Reactive
Chromium containing
Spent pickle liquor
Being Reported
by Wells
53
28
20
13
12
Injection
By Wells
29
10
7
4
9
                fron steel finishing
                operations

K011            Bottom Stream from
                wastewater stripper
                in production of
                acrylonitrile

KD13            Botton stream fro^i the
                acetonitrile column in
                the production of acry-
                lonitrile

K014            Bottons fron acetonitrile
                purification column in
                production acrylonitrile

F001            Halogenated solvents used
                in degreasing

U105                  Benzene
                                V-8

-------
       non-halcgenated solvents.  In four of these wells it was ambiguous
       as to whether these wastes were actually injected.  The particular
       facilities injecting these solvents are listed in Table V-4.

            The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments are also concerned
       in Section 201(f) with the disposal of particular liquid hazardous
       wastes.   The Amendments require that not later than 45 months
       after the date of the enactment of these Amendments "the Admin-
       istrator shall complete a review of the disposal of all hazardous
       wastes referred to in paragraph (2) of subsection (e) by under-
       ground injection into deep wells".  Of the wastes listed in the
       "California list", only wastes with a pH £ 2.0 and with nickel
       in concentrations higher than 134 mg/1 were found to be injected.

            Of the 181 active wells in 1983/ information concerning the
       pH of the waste streams was obtained on 138 wells.  There were
       133 wells which reported a pH greater than 2 and 35 wells
       (25% of the total) had a pH less than or equal to 2.  The wells
       injecting acids with a pH £ 2 are listed in Table V-5.  Nickel
       with a concentration of 500 mg/1 was found to be injected into
       wells by E.I. Dupont (Victoria, Texas).

5.7    Section 201(g) of the HSWA

            Section 201(g) of the HSWA might also affect the injection
       of hazardous waste.  In the case of any hazardous waste identified
       or listed under §6921 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act the Admin-
       istrator shall promulgate final regulations prohibiting one or
       more methods of land disposal of the wastes listed except for
       methods of land disposal which the Administrator determines will
       be protective of human health and the environment for as long as
       the waste remains hazardous.  These listed wastes are ranked
       taking into consideration their intrinsic hazard and their volume.
       For the first one-third of the listed wastes the Administrator
       shall promulgate regulations or make a determination of their
       protectiveness within forty-five motnhs after November 8, 1984.
       For the second third, the deadline is fifty-five months, and for
       the last third, the deadline is sixty-six months.

5.8    Off-Site Operations

            Off-site operations may be characterized as cotmercial
       waste disposal facilities which accept a variety of wastes
       from various manufacturing and industrial concerns located off
       the site of the injection well.  Due to the high variability in
       composition of waste streams disposed of in these wells (up to
       300 different waste streams were reportedly accepted at a single
       off-site facility), very little can be generalized about the
                                  V-9

-------
                          TABLE V-4

FACILITIES INJECTING RCRA CODES F001, F002, F003, F004, and  F005



State      Facility         Well No.  F001   F002   F003   F004   F005

Alaska     Arco Alaska Inc.   1         x      x      x             x

Louisiana  Witco Chemical     1                                     x
           Corp.,Gretna

Ohio       Chemical Waste     3         *
           Management, Inc.   4         *
                              5         *
                              6         *

Oklahoma   American Airlines  1         x

           Chemical           1         x             x       x     x
           Resources, Inc.
                x Reported RCRA codes ambiguous as  to whether this waste
                  was injected

                * Reported injected RCRA codes
                                V-10

-------
                      TABLE V-5

WELLS INJECTING ACIDS WITH pH  LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 2
             •IN "THE UNITED STATES IN 1983


WELL


5TATE FACILITY NUMBER pH
FL



IL

IN

KS



KY

IA




MI

MS
OH



TX







Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Co.
Monsanto Co.


Allied Chemical Co.
LTV Steel Co.
Midwest Steel
United States Steel Corp.
Vulcan Materials Co.



E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.

BASF Wyandotte Chemical Corp.
Intrn'l. Minerals & Chemical
Corp.
Shell Oil Co., West Site

"BASF Wyandotte

Filtrol Corp.
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.



EW. I. DuPont, Sabine River Works


E.I. DuPont, Victoria



Potash Co. of America Division
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
IN9
4
7
8
9
1
2
D-l
1
2
8
9
2
3
1
5
3
4
6
10
8
ACN3
10
7
6
5
1
0
1.5-4.0
1.5-4.0.
1.5-4.0
1.0
< 1.0
1.0
<.1.0
1.0-12.5
1.5-13.0
1.0-12.5
1.0-12.5
2.0
2.0
< 1.0
1.0
1.0
0.2
0.2
2.0
2.0
1.8
0.5
.0.5
0.5
0.3
1.1
1.1
1.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
2.0
1.0



















( ave . )
(ave.)
( ave . )







( ave . )
(ave.)
( ave . )


                         V-ll

-------
    types of wastes disposed at off-site Class I well facilities.
    Table V-6 provides the number, location and estimated annual
    volume injected by the active offsite wells.  The 13 wells
    active in 1983 constitute 8.3% of the total number of
    active Class I wells and account for about 4.1% of the
    calculated total annual volume injected by active Class I
    wells.*  It appears, then, that off-site wells do not receive a
    disproportionate volume of hazardous waste.  Dividing the total
    annual volume for off-site wells 475 by the number of wells
    gives an approximate average injection volume of 31.7 million
    gallons of waste per well per year.  The average injection
    volume for all active Class I wells is 63 MGY.
Three more off-site wells started or returned to. operation  in  1984.
It is estimated that in 1984 the percentage of volume  injected  in
off-site wells was 4.4%.
                               V-12

-------
                     TABLE V-6

VOLUME=INJECTED INTO "ACTIVE CLASS I HW OFF-SITE WELLS  IN  1983


                                              Annual Volume
                                              Injected (MGY)
State            Number of Wells              in  1983	

Louisiana              2                            90

Ohio                   5                           101

Oklahoma               1                            18

Texas                 __7                           256

         TOTAL        15                           475
                             V-13

-------

-------
                               Chapter VI

                          Regulatory Controls

6.1   Introduction

      Three EPA programs regulate the injection of hazardous waste.   The
      RCRA program has jurisdiction over all surface facilities  at
      injection sites and over the disposal of hazardous waste.   The
      NPDES program has jurisdiction over all discharges into waters of
      the United States, and in some States NPDES permits have been
      issued for injection wells.  EPA lacks federal NPDES jurisdiction
      over the disposal of wastes through wells;  however, States must
      have specific authority to control this type of disposal in order
      to receive NPDES program approval (CWA §402(b)(1)(D)).  This was
      resolved by the courts (Exxon vs. Train (10ERC 1289)) in 1977.
      The UIC program regulates all underground injection facilities.
      UIC jurisdiction occurs once the liquid enters the injection
      well.

6.2   Hazardous Waste Management Program

      The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA)  of 1976, as
      amended, required EPA to develop and implement a regulatory
      program to control "from the cradle to the  grave"  those wastes
      which were determined to be "hazardous" as  a result of their
      "tOxicity, persistence, and degradability in nature, potential for
      accumulation in tissue, and other related factors  such as
      flammability, corrosiveness, and other hazardous characteristics."
      In fulfilling this statutory mandate,  EPA promulgated a set
      of regulations identifying hazardous wastes and establishing minimum
      requirements for the generation, transportation, treatment,
      storage and disposal of hazardous waste.   "The Hazardous and
      Solid Waste Amendments of 1984"  became effective November  8, 1984,
      and set future limitations upon  the land  disposal  of hazardous
      wastes.          •

      EPA is fully responsible, under  RCRA,  for implementing this
      regulatory program throughout  the country,  including responsibility
      for issuance of permits to all hazardous  waste treatment,  storage
      and disposal facilities.   This implementation responsibility may,
      however, be transferred to any State which  has a hazardous waste
      management program which  is "equivalent"  (i.e.,  at least as
      stringent) to the Federal RCRA,  Subtitle  C, program.  As of
      February 1984, 44 states  had become "authorized" to. implement
      RCRA Subtitle C in lieu of EPA.

      Since the RCRA Subtitle C program addressed all hazardous  waste
      generation and management, those injection  wells used for  disposal
      of hazardous waste became subject to RCRA regulation in addition
      to requirements and regulations  under  the Safe Drinking Water
      Act (which mandates the UIC program).

      By July 26,  1982 , EPA had issued the bulk of  the RCRA regulations
      for permitting facilities which  treated,  stored, or disposed of
      hazardous waste, both new and  existing, except  for injection well
      disposal.  However,  the Agency determined that  under 40 CFR

-------
      §270.60(b) hazardous waste injection wells would be granted RCRA
      "permits by rule." Permits would be granted under an EPA approved
      UIC program, and it was not necessary to promulgate separate
      permitting regulations under RCRA.  Under these guidelines, all
      Class I HW wells in hazardous waste management facilities are
      deemed to have a permit by-rule under the RCRA program if they
      are permitted under the UIC program.  Existing Class I HW
      wells are authorized by rule in the UIC program until they are
      formally repermitted following the requirements of 40 CFR Parts
      144, 146 and 147 (UIC regulations).

      Table VI-1 and figure VI-1 show the numbers of permit or interim
      status (RCRA) given under each program.  The heading "others"
      gives the number of permits issued by the States independently
      and not necessarily following Federal standards.

      Any other hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal unit
      located at the site of a hazardous waste injection well is subject
      to full permitting under RCRA and must have a separate permit.

6.3   National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)

      The principal mechanism for the control and management of pollutant
      discharges to waters of the United States is the National Pollutant
      Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) authorized under Section
      402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)  (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq,).  Each dis-
      charge permit issued by EPA or an approved state under the NPDES
      program imposes enforceable pollution control .requirements, including:

           0  Discharge limitations based on national technology-based
              requirements or, where necessary, more stringent state
              water quality standards;

           0  Schedules for needed construction or installation of new
              pollution control technology; and

           0  Self-monitoring and reporting requirements.

6.3.1 Limitations of the NPDES Program

      Section 402(b)(l)(D) of the CWA specifically requires that
      States must have sufficient statutory authority to control the
      disposal of pollutants into wells to qualify for NPDES program
      approval.   Additionally, 40 CFR §123.28 provides that a state
      with a UIC program approved under Section 1422 of the SDWA
      satisfies  this requirement.

      The question of whether or not EPA has the same jurisdiction
      over disposal of pollutants into wells as States has been addressed
      in Exxon v. Train (10 ERG 1289).   The Court has interpreted the.
      legislative history of the CWA as not authorizing Federal control
      over any phase of ground-water pollution.  Rather, the Court
      relied heavily on the research provisions of sections 102, 104
      and 106 of the CWA to confirm Congressional intent for EPA to
                                  VI-2

-------
        CO
       rH
       rH
    CO  0)

    2*
 to  rtJ 2
jj  jj £
 m -H  co
£  Li  en
    0)  (Q
U-4 JJ rH
 0  C CJ

        Li
 O  Li  O
Z  O u-i
                       CO
                       ro
                              C     -H
                                               ooooccvmooovcvo
                                                                                               CM
                                                                                               CN
co
g
S
•H  CO
 Li  3
 H O JJ
oi Cu 













CD rH
> CO ,0)
•H co 2
JJ (TJ
0 rH 2
< cj £
CN -rH
JJ
c
CT
UIC Program

S1
•H
JJ
C
fl)
C
0)
1
M

U
S
^

C
Ed

U-l
0 X
S S

_g S1
Vj (2
rflj
Q Ed
"T
?
ion Control
jj
3
iH
rH
Q
cu

U-l
O
jj
C >

JJ rH
D O
ao
Ed
a
CN ^«
JJ
rH
3
rH
Q
Li
•H
• >
£
Ed

X u-i
M 0
C JJ
o c
•H  >
u 5
CO -H
•H PJ*.
O 33
C C£
• H
rH <£
rH £X
IH Cd
in CM
jj
Ll
•H
Ed
•a
(TS
jr
jj
rH

0
E

U-t >
O M
JJ C
C O
3J -H
4J C?
Li OS
(0
Qu  0
S S
•H (U
c? B
0£ Li
< a
cm 
O
3
JJ
<9
(TJ
(TJ
•H
CO
•H
3
Q
c
Dl
•H
o
•H
a
•H
CO
en
•H
03
en
•H



O
•H
•S
1
Q
,c
rH
-*


CO
(TJ
X

                                                     Cb

-------
a
LU
ID
CO
01
CO
1—
UJ
CL


_J
CO
en
u
                                                            en
                                                            u
                                                            a
                                                            CL
                                                           1
                                                                cc
                                                                a.
                         S"I"13M  dO #


                               VI-4

-------
      perform an information gathering role.  Efforts to control ground-
      water pollution should be left to the States until such time as EPA
      develops the necessary information so that Congress could legislate
      intelligently on the subject.  Thus, the Court held that "...
      the Administrator, as an incident to his power under §402(a) to
      issue permits authorizing the discharge of pollutants into
      surface waters, does not have the authority to place conditions
      in such permits that control the disposal of wastes into deep
      wells."

      The NPDES permits are also limited with respect to which discharged
      pollutants fall under their jurisdiction.  The term pollutant, as
      defined in section 502(2) and subsection (B) of the CWA specifically
      excludes "... water, gas or other material which is injected into a
      well to facilitate production and which is disposed in a well, if the
      well used either to facilitate production or for disposal purposes is
      approved by authority of the state in which the well is located, and
      if such state determines that such injection or disposal will not result
      in the degradation of ground or subsurface water resources."  With this
      provision, Congress has limited the control of the NPDES program has
      over oil and gas production.

6.3.2 NPDES Permits

      As noted previously, EPA lacks authority to regulated injection wells
      under the NPDES Program.  This authority has been given to the UIC program
      by Congress.   However, NPDES permits do contain monitoring and reporting
      requirements  applicable to injection wells'.  Generally, monitoring re-
      quirements are limited to volume and pressure and, in some cases, pH.
      Failure to perform monitoring and/or report the results is a violation of
      the permit and may subject the permittee to permit modification or revocatior
      and administrative or judicial enforcement actions.

      To date EPA and the 37 approved NPDES States have issued over 65,000
      discharge permits.  Of this total,  over 7,500 have been classified as
      major dischargers due to their la»rge size, location with respect to water
      quality problems, complexity or toxic nature of their discharge.   A small
      number of these issued permits cover the discharge of pollutants into
      wells.  Table VI-1 lists by State the number of Class I HW NPDES well
      permits issued.  Approximately 40%  of the wells have been permitted by
      the NPDES program.

6.4   The Underground Injection Control (UIC)  Program

      This program was mandated in part C of the Safe Drinking Water Act
      (SDWA) of 1974.  The UIC program is referenced in the SDWA under
      the title of  "The Underground Water Source Protection Program."
      The SDWA requires EPA to:

      0   Publish minimum national requirements for effective State Underground
         Injection  Control programs;

      0   List States that need UIC programs (all States have been listed);
                               VI-5

-------
0  Make grants to States for developing and implementing UIC programs;

0  Review proposed State programs and either approve or disapprove
   them;

0  Give primary enforcement responsibility to States with approved
   proposals;

0  Overview implementation of the program in the States with
   approved programs;

0  Promulgate and enforce UIC programs in listed States which
   choose not to participate or do not develop and operate an approvable
   program.

The main purpose of the program is to protect underground sources of
drinking water (USDW), defined as aquifers yielding water containing
less than 10,000 mg/1 of IDS, from any threats resulting from
underground injection.

Under the scheme of the SDWA, the national regulations, which were
promulgated in 1980, define minimum standards for effective State
programs.  Requirements become applicable to owners and operators of
injection wells in a particular jurisdiction when the Administrator
approves a State's UIC program or promulgates a Federally-implemented
program for a State, except that injectors of hazardous waste are
subject to the interim standards under RCRA.  The first State UIC
program for Class I wells was approved for Texas in January 1982.  By
December 1985, UIC programs had been approved or promulgated for all
States and Territories.

Existing Class I wells must be repermitted within five years of Che
effective date of the State or Federal program.   New wells may not be
constructed without a permit.  Existing wells are authorized by rule
until they are repermitted.  However, within one year from the effective
date they must be in compliance with most of the construction, operating,
monitoring and reporting requirements of the regulations.  Since many
States regulated Class I wells in some form prior to the UIC program,
the rule requirement in the case of primacy States normally mesms the
continued application of the previously-issued State permit.

While the national regulations allowed five years for the repermitting
of the existing Class I wells, EPA hopes to accomplished this much
sooner, especially in the case of wells injecting hazardous waste.  At
the time State programs were approved, the State submissions were
required to contain a schedule for calling in Class I permit applications
Furthermore, as part of the Agency's Strategic Planning and Management
System, the repermitting of Class I wells, has been established as an Agen
priority.
                            VI-6

-------
6.4.1 Requirements for Class I Hazardous  Waste Wells

      Because of the potential danger  of  hazardous  wastes,  Class  I
      hazardous waste (HW)  injection wells  must meet  very  strict
      construction and operating requirements.  These technical requirements
      are set forth in 40 CFR Part 146, Subparts A  and B.   Subpart A
      contains general specifications  used  for permitting  and repermitting
      all Class I wells.  Subpart B provides  for specific  construction,
      operation, monitoring, and reporting  requirements  that take into
      account the site characteristics for  a  well.  These  characteristics
      include the geology,  hydrology,  types of waste,  and  construction
      techniques.  These  requirements  are discussed further in the section
      on UIC Permits.

      A stated purpose in the Safe Drinking Water Act is the delegation
      of the UIC program  to the States.   EPA  has delegated  the UIC program
      to States that have most of the  HW  injection  wells,  and provides
      technical and financial assistance  to these States for a sound
      start of the implementation of. the  programs.

      Of the 252 HW injection wells, the  32 delegated States account
      for 200 wells (80.6%).   Of the 195  active wells  these States
      account for 171  (87.7%).

      In the event that a State fails  to  submit an  application, or if a
      State application is  disapproved, EPA must promulgate the UIC
      program for that State and assume primary enforcement responsibility.
      EPA promulgated  direct  implementation programs  for the 25 States
      shown in Table VI-2 on May 11 and November 15,  1984.  Four of
      the States (California,  Indiana, Kentucky and Michigan) in Table
      VI-2 are known to have active HW injection wells.  A  total of 24
      active wells  in  17  facilities  have  been inventoried in these
      States.                                  •
                               TABLE VI-2
                       EPA  Implemented Programs

      ALASKA                       INDIANA             MINNESOTA
      AMERICAN SAMOA               IOWA                *MISSOURI
      ARIZONA                      KENTUCKY            MONTANA
      CALIFORNIA                   MICHIGAN            NEVADA
      COLORADO                                        NEW  YORK
     *COMMONWEALTH  OF  THE                             VIRGINIA
        NORTHERN MARIANA  ISLANDS  *SOUTH  DAKOTA        PENNSYLVANIA
      DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA        **OSAGE               PUERTO RICO
     *HAWAII                                          TENNESSEE
     *IDAHO                                           TRUST TERRITORIES
      VIRGIN ISLANDS
     * These 5 states are also applying for delegation of the UIC program
       and their status may change.
     ** Indian Nation, not a State.

-------
6.5   UIC Permits

      A permit is a specific authorization to an individual to carry
      out an activity under certain conditions and  limitations.
      Permits are generally considered to make possible a higher degree
      of control over the affected  activity.   On the  other hand,  permits
      are resource and time intensive since they require:   (1)  the
      individual to file an application containing  information about:
      his proposed activity;  (2)  the effective participation of  the public
      in the review process;  and  (3)  State or EPA personnel to  review,
      write and process each permit.

      UIC Class I HW permits may  be issued or reissued  for a ten year term.
      In addition, if a facility  holds permits under  more  than  one EPA-
      administared program, all permits must  be reviewed whenever any
      permit is changed, revoked  or reissued.

      Each permit must be enforceable in the  jurisdiction  in which it is
      issued.  It must specify construction,  abandonment,  operating,
      monitoring and reporting requirements.   In addition,  permits must
      incorporate appropriate compliance schedules  if any  corrective
      action is to be taken by the  well owner/operator.  Finally,  permits
      must recognize the right of the permitting authority to have
      access to the well and related  records  to assure  compliance  with
      permit terms.

      The information that must be  available  to the permitting  authority
      is specified in the State program which  is based  on  the requirements
      in 40 CFR Part 146.  Generally, such information  includes  the
      surface and subterranean features  of the injection area,  the
      location of underground sources of drinking water in the  vicinity,
      the results of tests  in the proposed injection  formation,
      construction features of the  well,  composition  of  the injection
      fluid, and the nature of the  proposed injection operation.

      The review of  a permit application begins with  the receipt  of a
      complete application  by the permitting  authority.  The  permitting
      authority considers the application,  gathers  additional information
      it needs, and  prepares a draft  permit.   The draft  permit must be
      presented for public comment  for at  least 30  days  with  a  fact
      sheet that provides enough  information  so that  the public  can
      make informed judgments about the proposed action.   If  the
      Director of the UIC program determines  that there  is  sufficient
      interest, a public hearing  is held and  announced  at  least  30 days
      in advance before the final permit  can  be prepared.

      Where EPA is the permitting authority,  certain  other requirements
      including an administrative record,  opportunity for  further  public
      hearing and cross examination,  revised  draft  permit  and appeal,
      etc., must be  met.
                                 VI-8

-------
      As of January 1985, 48 wells in 26 facilities had been permitted
      following criteria set in the UIC regulations.  These 48 permits
      account for 24.6% of the total number to be issued.   The remainder
      of the permits have been presented to the regulatory Agencies and
      are being reviewed.  Figure VI-2 shows this fact graphically.

6.5.1 UIC Operational Requirements

      The ground-water environment is extremely vulnerable to pollution,
      and it is extremely slow to cleanse .itself when pollution occurs.
      Due to the vulnerability of ground water and the nation's dependence
      on this resource, the Underground Injection Control  program must
      have strong operational and monitoring requirements.  Operational
      requirements for Class I wells under the OIC program include (40
      CFR §146.l3(a)):

        1)  Injection pressure must not exceed a pressure  which would
            initiate or propagate fractures in the injection or confining
            zones.  In no case shall injection pressure cause the movement
            of injection or formations fluids  into underground sources
            of drinking water.

        2)  Injection between the outermost casing protecting USDWs and
            the well bore is not  permitted.
                                                        *
        3)  The annulus should be filled with  a fluid and  pressurized.

      In general,  all  injection wells have a limitation on the injection
      pressure.   This  limitation  is set below  some calculated fracture
      pressure which is representative of the  geological conditions in
      the States.   There are several methods and equations utilized for
      computing injection pressures.   Most States  set the  injection
      pressure limitations based  on a hydraulic fracturing gradient.
      The average  injection pressure for Class I HW wells  was found to
      be 572 psig, and 85% of the wells injected waste at  less than
      1,000 psig.   Approximately  20% of wells  in Figure VI-3 injected
      waste into formations by gravity flow.  In this case minimum
      pressure was maintained only to keep the injected fluid moving
      through the pipes toward the injection wells.   No formal inves-
      tigation was conducted in this  assessment to find out  the
      reliability  of the criteria applied in establishing  the pressure
      limit by the States.

      However,  an analysis was made of the reported average  bottom hole
      pressure  in  94 out  of the 195 active wells  as  compared with  an
      "allowable"  injection pressure.   This "allowable" injection
      pressure  was calculated by  assuming a fracture  gradient  of
      0.733 psi/ft which  is a rather conservative  number.   Figure  VI-3
      shows this comparison.   Out  of  the 94 wells  only 4 appear to be
      injecting above  this pressure.   Additional analysis  of the data
      revealed  that:
                                VI-9

-------
-J
u
^  LL
ID  O


LL.  CO
0  <


CO
                   CO


                   (C
                   CM
a
LU
^ ~
LO I
^ CO *U
T cn „
S-/ . 	 | ,
^^ /
£> /
^ >^ /
>— 1 C£
CN ^ <^
g o: D
| U Z

/


•




•
/




•





!«
/






*







^
>
j>







?
y







•








"
s








k
V








•
>








^








i
>








•
>








•
^








>>








5*
f*








^








?
f








^








^








*








••








!•








*







«
•







•p
|M«







^
- 'u >x v'
vvv^
XV y^. y^V y
£X<;v^
-------
   CO
   LL!
   a:
   CO
   CO
   LU
   a.

   LL)
     «
   — i
   a
   2:
2  o
  -o
   *—/
   CQ

   LL
   a
   a
   CO
   01
   <
   CL
   a
   u

                       
-------
        1)  One well injects at a pressure of 800 psi which may be
            high;

        2)  The specific gravity of the liquid injected in one well
            varies widely.  The highest number (1.65) was used for the
            calculation;

        3)  Two wells inject into very shallow formations (in OK);

      Determination of the suitability of formations to withstand the
      bottom hole pressure exerted on it by injection wells is not a
      simple process.  In most cases the regulations controlling the
      injection pressure in a State are very conservative and it is
      the responsibility of the permittee to prove that the well can
      be operated at a higher than the allowable pressure.  Of the
      cases described above it appears that the only problem may be
      in the two Oklahoma wells.  This is because the apparently high
      injection pressure is compounded by the fact that these two
      wells inject into a very shallow formation in which the confining
      zone is very thin.  The distance from the top to the injection
      zone to the bottom of the USDW in the two OK wells is less
      than 30 feet.

      In all but one of the wells visited,  the annulus between the
      casing and the tubing was filled with a fluid and pressurized.
      BASF Wyandotte in Michigan uses a fluid seal instead of a mechanical
      packer.  In one of the wells, (Shell-Norco, LA), the annulus was
      filled with cement.  This well will be abandoned in the near
      future.  All other wells at the twenty facilities visited had the
      annulus filled with a fluid and isolated by the use of a packer
      or fluid seal.
6.5.2 Monitoring
      Monitoring requirements for Class I wells under the UIC program
      include (40 CFR §146.13(b):

        1)  Analysis of injected fluids with sufficient frequency to be
            representative.

        2)  Installation and use of continuous monitoring devices for
            injection pressure,  flow rate, volume and annulus pressure.

        3)  A demonstration of mechanical integrity at least every 5 years.

        4)  A plan that shows the types, number and location of wells
            in the Area of Review to be used to monitor any migration
            of fluids into and pressure in the underground source of
                                 VI-12

-------
      drinking water.  Included in this plan there should also be
      a description of the parameters of the monitoring and its
      frequency.

  5)  Special requirements are also applicable for commercial
      (off-site) facilities.  These facilities are covered under
      the manifest requirements of RCRA.

This next to last requirement appears to imply the need for
monitoring wells.  However, such a requirement is not clearly
mandated in the UIC regulations.  In the originally proposed UIC
regulations there was a requirement for monitoring wells for
Class I facilities.  This requirement was relaxed in the final
regulations as the result of comments to the effect that there
was no technology that would define the siting of these monitoring
wells.  Furthermore, the drilling of multiple monitoring wells
into a very deep interval would be prohibitively expensive.  The
final regulations have only a requirement for a plan showing the
wells that would be monitored, and not a directive to drill
monitoring wells.  However, all facilities visited which have
surface impoundments are equipped with shallow monitoring wells
to detect ground-water contamination, required under the RCRA
provisions.  Unfortunately, their use for monitoring deep injection
wells may not be very effective since they only monitor shallow
aquifers.

Because the UIC program has not been 'fully implemented in most
States there appeared to be no consistency in the scheduling of
the analysis of injection fluids.  However,  there was a common
practice for commercial activities to sample the waste from each
client prior to injection.  This practice was mainly for the
purpose of justifying different disposal price structures and in
some cases to determine compatibility of the equipment and the    •
injection zone with the injection fluid.  In most on-site operations,
industries that manufacture different products sample regularly
and usually every time the waste stream changes.  However, depending
on what information the State required from the operator, this
information may or may not be available in the files.   Once all
States have put in place the requirements for their federally
approved UIC program, specific waste information should be available,

Of the 181 wells which were active in 1983,  82 provided information
regarding the frequency of injection analysis.   Fifty four of
these facilities conducted injection fluid analysis at least on a
weekly basis.  In general, the frequency of  analysis varied in
off-site facilities and they were conducted only when different
types of waste were received.  With the advent  of full implementation
of the UIC program, a more consistent injection fluid analysis
program will be implemented.
                           VI-13

-------
      In at least one case, frequent analysis could have alerted Louisiana
      State officials (if a program had been in place) of the potential
      for corrosion of the Rollins (previously CLAW) facility, due to
      the indiscriminate injection of all types of waste by its former
      owner.

      All but two of the facilities visited in this assessment operated
      continuous monitoring instruments in their flow path.  These
      instruments measure at least injection pressure, annulus pressure
      and pumping rate.   In addition, many of these facilities have
      alarms and/or automatic shut-off systems to prevent any mishaps.
      In some facilities, an on-the-job operator monitors the operations
      24 hours a day from the control room.

      Inland Steel in East Chicago, Indiana was one of the facilities
      that did not monitor continuously.  During the site visit of
      this facility it was observed that the injection pressure
      gauge on the facility's one injection well was not operational.
      Evidence also indicated that even when the gauge was operational,
      it was delivering inaccurate readings.
6.5.3 Reporting
      Reporting requirements for Class I wells under the UIC
      program include (40 CFR § 146.13(c)):

           (1)  The results of the analyses of the injection fluid
                including physical and chemical characteristics
                must be reported every quarter to the State Director
                (in the case of  State UIC primacy) or the Regional
                Administrator (in the case of a Federally implemented
                program).

           (2)  All of the injection well characteristics that have
                been monitored and recorded continuously (injection
                pressure, flow-rate,  volume,  and annular pressure)
                should be reported quarterly as monthly averages,
                maximums and minimums.

           (3)  The results of each mechanical integrity test must
                be reported in the first quarterly report to the
                State Director or Regional Administrator after the test
                is completed.

           (4)  Every quarter, the number,  locations, and types of
                monitoring wells within the area of review used to
                detect fluid migration into and pressure changes in
                underground sources of drinking water must be reported.
                The frequency of monitoring and characteristics to be
                monitored must be reported for each of the wells.
                                 VI-14

-------
           (5)  The results of other injection well tests required
                by the State Director or Regional Administrator
                (as appropriate) and the results of any well work-overs
                should be reported in the first quarterly report after
                these have occurred.

           (6)  Report within 24 hours any violation that may cause
                contamination of a USDW.

      Information on reporting could only be obtained from the twenty
      facilities visited.  All of these facilities sent reports to the
      appropriate State agency regarding the items discussed above.
      Seven facilities sent reports monthly, seven quarterly, and six
      sent reports periodically but did not list the frequency.  Nineteen
      of the facilities reported the monitoring information which was
      identified in the permit requirements.  Only one of these facilities
      had refused to submit waste characteristics information to the
      State as of the time of the EPA visit.  Since then this facility
      has agreed to report periodically.

      From the information available it appears that most of the UIC
      requirements for monitoring and reporting are being fulfilled.
      When all the wells are repermitted under the UIC program, these
      requirements will be included as conditions for approval and/or
      corrective action.                     .

6.6   Inspection" and Surveillance

      A surveillance program is usually associated with the efforts
      of the regulating entity to assure that the requirements of a
      program are followed.  In following the concept of the "pathways
      of pollution" the surveillance program should assure that all the
      requirements for the particular facility (i.e., permit conditions,
      State regulations) are  being followed in order to prevent
      pollution.

      The tools used in surveillance are inspections and investi-
      gations.  Inspections are routine procedures which are conducted
      periodically for all facilities.   During an inspection the regulator
      should assure that all  systems are operating properly and in
      accordance with the permit and the regulations.  An investigation
      is usually originated by complaints,  a pollution episode, suspicion
      of noncompliance, etc.

      The UIC program under 40 CFR Part 145 Subpart B requires all
      States receiving delegation of the program to have inspection
      and surveillance procedures to determine independently, compliance
      or noncompliance by the  regulated facility.   To this effect the
      State has to maintain:

           1)   The capability  to investigate compliance with
               permitting and  other regulatory requirements;
                                 VI-15

-------
     2)  The capability to inspect the regulated facilities
         periodically to determine: compliance or noncompliance
         with permit conditions and other requirements; accuracy
         of self-monitoring data; and adequacy of sampling and
         monitoring programs;

     3)  A program to investigate violations of permit conditions
         or other program requirements; and

     4)  The capability and mechanisms to receive and investigate
         information provided by the public related to violations.

To accomplish the above the State statute should give the UIC agencies:
1) the right of entry;  2) the right to copy reports on site; 3) the
right to conduct investigations; and 4) the right to assess penalties
to violators or to sue in civil and/or criminal court.  This is re-
quired before delegation can be given to the State.

The amount of regulatory activity performed by State agencies on Class
I HW facilities varies from State to State, depending on such factors
as the number of active wells in the State, previous problems and
historical practices of both industry and government.  Under existing
programs, all States require inspections of Class I wells but the
frequency of such inspections varies.

Most States inspect wells annually or semi-annually, but three States
have quarterly inspections, one has monthly inspections and two
States inspect on a nonscheduled basis.  The date of the last
inspections at each facility and other relevant information is
contained in the appendices.

Data collected during inspection depended on the activity occurring
at each well at the time of inspection.  For frequent, routine
inspections, data collected by the State official was generally
limited to operational parameters and would often include a check
on compliance or obvious problems with surface features (gauges,
piping, pumps, recording devices, tanks, signs, fences, etc.).
In addition, where monitoring records were kept on-site, the records
were usually reviewed for completeness and accuracy.

Some State agencies, notably in Arkansas, California, Louisiana,
Oklahoma and Texas made attempts to witness or inspect mechanical
integrity tests.  Louisiana officials also inspected the records of
such tests if they had not actually witnessed the test-in operation.
Most State agencies will inspect part of a workover operation.,
especially if such workover is mandated by an enforcement action.
Only Florida, California, Ohio and Texas reported inspections of
wells during initial construction.
                             VI-16

-------
6.7   Noncompliance and Enforcement*

      The number of recorded permit noncompliance actions  in each
      State was proportional to the number of Class I wells in the
      State.  Texas and Louisiana,  with the majority of  wells, reported
      the greatest number of permit violations.   There is  no record
      of violations in Kansas,  Kentucky and Mississippi.

      The actions taken by State agency officials in cases of noncompliance
      were generally commensurate with the seriousness of  the violations.
      Most minor violations such as paperwork deficiencies, improper
      recording devices, or lack of signs  and barriers were corrected
      through an informal process of agreement between well operator
      and State agency.  The inventory records indicated that for minor
      problems, such informal agreements were effective  and resulted in
      the attainment of compliance.

      For more serious violations,  enforcement tools used  by State
      agencies had included formal  notices of violation, consent
      agreements and judicial action.   These had  been used in cases of
      failure to report data, well  construction problems,  loss of
      mechanical integrity, and exceeding  pressure limitations.

      Most of the serious cases of  noncompliance  had .either been
      resolved to the satisfaction  of  the  State agency or  were in the
      process of being resolved.  For  those that  were  being resolved,
    •  they were apparently being corrected under  agency auspices  under  an
      agreed-upon schedule.
      *The information in  thi-s  section was mostly obtained from  State
      files.   It was assumed in the analysis of the data that the
      absence  of information in the State's files indicated that the
      well was in compliance.   In the more notorious cases, other sources
      were consulted.   The reader should realize that in some of the
      major violations  the State could have had corrections made by
      administrative or informal actions; while in a few less serious
      cases (e.g. reporting violations) the State may have had to
      resort to more drastic actions.
                                VI-17

-------
Figure VI-4 graphically summarizes compliance and enforcement
actions.  Graph A indicates that 29.8% of all off-site and  on-site
Class I HW wells in the United States have had a nonconpliance
record in State or EPA files.  The occurrences of different
types of noncompliance are depicted proportionately  in graph B.

The most frequently occurring type of nonconpliance, violation
of monitoring and reporting requirements, accounted  for 50% of
all violations.  The States' various responses to noncompliance
are shown in Graph C, indicating that most violations have  been
resolved by administrative action.  (Graph A also indicates that
of the total percent of wells in nonccmpliance, 5.6%, were  off-site
wells However, since off-site wells constitute approximately 9.9%
of the total, this would indicate that about 56% of  all off-site
wells were in nonccmpliance.)  Table VI-3 shows the  off-site
facilities and wells in these facilities involved in nonccmpliance
actions.  Table VI-4 shows the on-site facilities and wells in
these facilities involved in noncompliance actions.

In summary, of the total 112 facilities, only nine have had
significant problems which could have resulted in contamination of
USDWs.  Of the nine, there is evidence that four did not  contaminate
USDWs as a result of injection.  These five facilities are:

     0  Chemical Waste Management, an off-site facility in  Ohio,
        did not discover leaks in the bottom part of the  long
        string casing of their wells until large amounts  of waste
        were injected into a shallower formation, which was
        separated fron the bottcm of the lowermost USDW by  more
        than 1,500 feet, 1,000 feet of which is confining strata.
        This operational problem was detected during mechanical
        integrity tests conducted to obtain information for a OIC
        permit.  The company has repaired five of the six problem
        wells and has been fined $12.5 million for these  and
        other violations.  The injection well that has not  been
        repaired is not in operation and may be permanently
        abandoned.

     0  Leaks in the wells of the Chemical Resources, Inc., facility
        (off-site) in Oklahoma were discovered as a  result  of
        mechanical integrity tests performed as part of the
        implementation of the UIC program.  This facility is also  in
        violation of its permit requirements in other areas (e.g.
        injection pressure) and the State is pursuing legal action.
        The State has indicated that a permit will be denied to  the
        present owner to operate this facility.
                           VI-18

-------
                                   FIGURE VI-a
                         COMPLIANCE  STATUS  OF  WELLS
                   TOTAL  OF  252  WELLS  IN  112  FACILITIES
 GRAPH A
 GRAPH B
                    IN COMPLIANCE 00.24X5
                                                ,CM SITE NONCOMP ««. 21X5
                                                        OFF SITE NONCOM (5. SSI)
                            TYPES  OF  NONCOMPLIANCE
                   (BASED  ON  84  NONCOMPLIANCE  EPISODES)
                                              THERS (11.901)
                  CONST, t OP. <22. B2*>
                                                    .MECH.  INTEGRITY CB. 33Z5
                                                       PRES. I RATE (7. 13Z)
                               *ON. t REP. «OXTT

                            ACTION TAKEN BY  STATE
                             JUDICIAL (IS. 321)
GRAPH C
                      ADMINISTRATIVE (82. 96Z)
                                                     INFORMAL U2. B8X)
                                                        .OTHERS (5. 56X)
                                       VI-19

-------
     0  Rollins Environmental Service (formerly CLAW) in Louisiana
        discovered leaks in a well allegedly resulting from the
        former owner's (CIAW) disregard for compatibility problems
        between the wastes, tubing, packer, and casing.  Rollins
        has repaired the leaks and is pursuing legal action
        against CLAW.

     0  Sonics International operated a commercial (off-site)
        facility in Ranger, Texas.  Due to shortcomings in the
        operations there was a well blow out.  Fortunately, there
        was no ground-water contamination.  The site was cleaned
        and the wells were plugged and properly abandoned.

     0  Browning-Ferris in Lake Charles, Louisiana contaminated a
        surficial aquifer at the site.  The State does not believe
        the contamination resulted fron injection, but rather
        from surface impoundments at the site.  The State is in-
        vestigating the cause.

In one case a final determination has not been made.

     0  At the Hereofina facility in North Carolina, waste migrated
        to a shallow formation because of inadequate cement in the
        borehole.  The formation in question, the Black Greek,
        contains water ranging from < 150 to > 10,000 mg/1 TDS.  The
        State is continuing to investigate to determine whether the
        Black Greek formation is a USDW within 1/4 of a mile of
        the injection well.  Two wells at this facility have been
        properly abandoned and the other two wells have ceased
        injection and are being used for monitoring.


There are three cases where USDWs have been contaminated as
a result of injection wells:

     0  At the Hammermill facility in Erie, Pennsylvania, apparently
        because of excessive injection pressures, sane of the injected
        waste migrated through the injection zone and reached an
        improperly abandoned well.  The site, which was closed in
        1975, is now on the "Superfund" list for remedial action.

     0  Shortly after Louisiana received UIC primacy, a well at
        the Tenneco site in Chalmette, Louisiana was found to be
        leaking into one of the lower USCWs  (not considered
        potable).  The contaminants  consisted of "sour water"
        refinery waste which had corroded through both tubing
        and casing.  The well was plugged and abandoned and Tenneco
        is cleaning up the contamination by  the use of recovery wells,
        and reinjection into the permitted zone through several new
        injection wells.
                           VI-20

-------
          0  The Velsicol Chemical Corporation in Beaumont, Texas violated
             their permit with respect to pH.  As a result, the casinq
             corroded and injected fluid did enter an unauthorized injection
             zone, which contained formation water with a TDS content of
             4,000 mg/1.  Velsicol is using the injection well to clean
             up the contamination.  In addition, wells were drilled and
             approximately 1.5 million gallons of water were pumped out.

     All three of the confirmed and the one suspected episodes took
     place before UIC implementation in the States.

6.8  Financial Responsibility

     The Underground Injection Control Regulations contain generic
     financial requirements to assure that the owner or operator of an
     injection well, has, or will have, the financial resources to
     properly plug and abandon the well at the end of its service
     life.  The objectives of requiring financial assurances are the
     following:

          (1)  To close, plug, abandon an injection well using sound
               engineering and technical standards;

          (2)  To provide the finances to complete the entire
               plugging operation necessary according to the
               best practice available;.

          (3)  To prevent the movement of fluids either into or
               between underground sources of drinking water.

     The UIC regulations do not contain any requirements for "post-
     abandonment" monitoring (post-closure in RCRA) of the ground
     water, or any time limits or restrictions on subsequent care of
     the plugged and abandoned well.

     The regulations require the Director (where the State has primacy,
     or Regional Administrator where EPA has direct implementation)
     to consider the following criterion when considering a permit
     application for a Class I, II, and III well:

          "A certificate that the applicant has assured through a
           performance bond, or other appropriate means, the resources
           necessary to close, plug, or abandon the well as required
           by 40 CFR §144.52(a)(7)".
                                VI-21

-------
Jj
I
 en
i
 (B
 O
 g
IH CD 0 £ C
03 C -rH O
S-rH (H CO TH
U-l rH i-H JJ
.* -rH rH (TJ
&£silfc
5 (TJ in LI
Q, • CD O
U £ CN >
O O rH TH C
•f~ CJ V)- Cti -rH
2
0)
JJ
03
JJ
CO

rH
03
•*H
O
?•
^
JJ
•rH
"SS1
rH JJ
•rH C
(TJ -rH
U-l
rH
CO (TJ
rH O
rH -rH
§c
(5
.c jj
vo a en
§03
jj
rH
<<




"8
>
rH
0
CO
£
03
jj
(TJ
JJ
CO
g
IJH -rH
0 JJ
03,2
80
*f4 ,—J
* >
•z
.
•rH
JJ
1 .
M
a
p
U
•
TJ en
C 03
(TJ -rH
o
-?g
•rH -rH
^ °
0 -rH
JJ U-i
•-H 03
g^
s:
                                                    1
                                                    en

                                                    ITJ
                                                    o
                                                    2
                                                    (TJ
                                                    JJ
                                                    (TJ
                                                   •rH
                                                    O
                                                   •rH

                                                   •g
                                                   ra
                                       CO
                                      ••H
                                       a
C
ui i?
03 03 TH
T3 U rH •n
C Cl"-" C
3 03 > 5
S"="S
•rH 03 •> 0
jj en JJ -
Z
en
03
• rH
g
03
•rH
CJ
-EC
C 03 03
0 TJ
•rH ryi
jj C CT
03 --H C
i-l i4 -H
03 0 -U
C. JJ U
O "H 0
c a
r^i 2
i
£ 03 £
03 JJ 03
UH 03
•G 03 rH
03 O

"3.13
C 03
CO 03 JJ
rH .C -rH Q,
rH 03 CO 3
£


03
>
• rH
JJ
03
U
jj
CO
•rH
C
1
<




ow-out
I-H
CO
CO
r-H
rH
1
                                       
M
03
CO

03
^> G
03 O
CL rH
e in
3 s

r-J
(TJ
g
•rH
U
(TJ
U
03
-W
C
M

en
o
• rH

co
 0}
 JJ
 (tj
 -U
 en
 o
•H
S
                                        ITS
                                       •t-(
                                        CO
co
(TJ
X

-------
en
cc
en
S3
en
cn
M
a>
 8
•H
JJ
              CO
                     CO
                    JJ
                     03
                    Jj
                    cn
       co -u
       O 03
       •H rH

       3-2
       Z. >
                     03
                     O
      •r?
      'w  •

       Sr^


       c S
      •H £

          to
          U-l
          Ll
                 CD
                 JJ
                 03
                 jj
                 en
 CD  JJ
 o  03
•H  rH
JJ  O
 O  'H
Z  >
 §
 tn
 cn

 2
 a

 cn

rH

 i3
          5
          (D
          JJ
          en
                                           •tH

                                        CD JJ
                                        O  03
                                        Z  >     M
                                        03
                                        3

CD
4J
8
Li

8
CD
JJ
03
JJ
cn
rH
g
fj
0
MJ.
c
pH
JJ
JJ U-l
O U-l
MJ. j5 0 •
O S-J
- CO CD
jj CD j*: S
Li C 0 0
03 0 Li 1
Q. N .C .*
15 8 ?^
rH JJ 10 CT
O O 03 C
cn o> o -H
CO -r- Ll
•H C M-l 3
Q -H O T3
CD
•rH
JJ
CD 8
Li »H
Li JJ 1
0 Q
CJ < *
CD
JJ
2
en
rH
03

cJ
0

C 1
IH *
L) -O
3 c cn
cn 03 CD
cn -H

°"I §
* o 'o
CO JJ -rH
JJ -H IJ-I JJ
03 C CD 3
Li 0 T3 0
Srji 2
* c D
•H 05 -H rH
JJ 3 JJ jQ
CJ rH Ll
CD 3 O rH
•r-l C O- rH
C C CO .CD
M (0 Ll 5

Li
CD
8
jV*
Ij
5
CD
JJ
03
JJ
en
•H
CD JJ
CJ 03
•H rH
JJ O
O -H
2 >
•S
03
S

JJ
CJ
2
cn c
c o
O -H
rH Ll
rH CO
3 o"

cn
03
3
^-4
pwJ
£
CD
JJ
03
cn






*
S
^)
a

*
S1
•H
on it or
s
                                                                     "8
                                                                                                    (0
                                                                                                          cn
rH C
rH (D
IS 03
CD
JJ
03
jj
cn

j
*




^
•
?
•H
JJ

1

•s
03
Li
O
jj
•H
8
s
1
1
*
CD
jj
03
JJ
cn
84J
03
"8 -H
Z. >
E













                              
-------










_J»1^
*
JJ
1

CO
M
H

tH
CJ

H- 1
CO
§

<
CO
rH
O<
Cd
Cd
y
M
j
a.
jj
D
0
S
as
£•
c
0)
cr
, <<
CO JJ
c
u_  b o


1
I
*


^J
Qj
cc
0 S
••H
3) JJ
CJ 

?
•H
8
(0
i-4
0
S
z
'o

i
jj
U
a

•g
m
g*
• H
• b
•*•>
S


CD TJ
rH £ JJ
sis



rH




1
1
*


g1

u
a
s
•g
(0
g1
b
jj
I



CN




|
1
*


g1
•r"4
•H
a
s
1
?
b
•i-1
1 •



m




I
1
*
0)
jj


g"
•^
JJ
a
^
•g
^
^?
• rH
b
jj
i



CN




1
1
•K
0)
JJ


?
• rH
JJ
O
a

"g
(TJ

b
jj
i



m




,
1
*


I

JJ
1
£
"g
(0
S1
•rH
b
•>->
l



CN




I
1
•K
0}
JJ

JJ
CO
II I p*
o 3
•H
0) JJ
CJ (C
3.2
z >

rj>
•1-1
t!
0
CL
£
"g
(T3

U
O
JJ
1



rH



*r
 I
5

a
 >
                                  6
                                   c
                                                                                         (0
o
o

1
•H
1
CJ

5
>
^.
CJ
ff
o
u
§
0)
2
jj
O
0

-.ti
CJ
u
3)
c
2
rH
(0
g
•H
JJ
flj
£
OJ
j^l
c
rH
C
rH
^ ^j
r""
fTJ
•H
J=
CJ

g
• H
3
OM
                                                                                                                                                     0?
                                                                                                                                                     IT3
                                                                                                                                                    jj
                                                                                                                                                     m
                                                                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                                                                    14-1
                                                                                                                                                     c
                                                                                                                                                    • fH

                                                                                                                                                     O


                                                                                                                                                     CO
                                                                                                                                                     0)
 (0
jj
CO
             (0  ^
            •H    •
             en
                                      §
                                                                                                                                                    "g

-------
 JJ


 I
 V}
 ^
 a
O
^T3
jj
to
0 g
•rH
8JJ
to
5 °
i^

•g
(C

g"g
•rH ITJ
JJ
<0 Cf
Sj C CT
fll -rH C
&' 8 'jj
JJ S-J
rH "H O
3J O 1)
State
0 g
•rH


C
•rH
JJ
•rH
•rH >rH
•S3
•rH U-l
U-l tl
O 3
rH
X. 3
O C
to c
i—l (u
State Aquifer restora-
rH
fl3
•rH
O
1

g
'H
JJ
03
•rH
JJ
O

§
cion
State * —
<$ §
• rH
0) JJ
o 
T
Report]

"g
(0
• rH
^
J^J
•P-t
I
1
-tc
(U
JJ
JJ
to
0 g
•H
o 
?
Report]

•g
1T3
•rH
8

•rH
g
•rH
?
(T3
JJ
0 g
•rH
8JJ
(0
'jj "o
O -iH
z >
r?
a

"S
(0
?
•rH
8
^j
•i-4
g
•rH
"g
(0
JJ
*8 g
•rH
(1) JJ
O (0
?-2
2 >
?
.__j
Report]

"g
10
•rH
8
^j
•
-------







jj

0
CO








03 JJ
C

Q c
ay
U
> 0
f-t 14-1

lution
0
en
£
|
O
CT
<


S
jj
o
<

1
*

,rf
cu
Ct3
UH C
0 0

8JJ
ItJ
•<-l •—»
JJ 0
z">
TJ
(-1

TJ
•t-i S T3 £
TJ C --H C
a -H a TJ "H
3 giu-i 3 u-i
ice i en c
j ^H O 3 OJ O
0 IH CJ 0 rt o
»H Q, rH d
i— t £ JJ r-i £ JJ
0 (3 O O S 0
Eb en c Eh en c
CO  *
5
•rH
en
1
U-l
U
gi
5
j3
ftj
j^
CO

(TJ
'o
•iH
^


1
*
^
(C

CO



I
•K
QJ
p
t— 1
CO
1
CO
§
CO
1— 1
CL
CsJ
1
<
M
1
u^
cu
5
CJ

§
ITJ
"c.

o
g
2
•s
1
g
jj
u

•r—
C
1
3



u
*"H O *O
<-* & 0)
J4J
•5




CM



g
JJ
(TJ
o

ing canmun
i J




i-^




c

tamination
g
CJ




i— i




en
^••1
itoring we
ers
C J=
S 0









c

tamination
CJ




CN




W
»—4
itoring we
1









en
C rH
•-t
b*




i— t


U
«
jj
0
"S
fQ
struct ion
s




p-4






iolations
*
>








g
ti
(fl
W con tam in
n
CO



i— i
^H
<



TJ
jj
jj
•*H o
S -u
G (TJ
"8 5
73 JJ
o; o
0) 
-------













I
u

U-l
o
fl)
1












i— i
>H
1



5
•H
JJ
3
f-j
O
CO
(l\
u/
K
fr
C
0)
&
<
JJ
C

S o
O •>-(
u jj
O 0

jj



CO

6
«U
CO
z

Sj
0>
14-1
•38
<^ jj
0)
JJ
nj
jj
en

r- 1
(C
•H
0
•d
3


g
•i-i
jj
m
•r-l
i
jj
§
CO
D




                                      5
                                      03
                                      jj
                                      en
                                      to

                                     i—i
                                      g
                                          d>
                                     JJ  3
                                      O  CO
                                      d)  CO
                                     •f—>  0)

                                      C  Q
                                     M  Qj
                                     
(!)

O
             3
                     0)
                     jj
                     (0
                     JJ

                     §
                         o
                         o
                        •f-l
                         en
 o
 CJ
JJ
•H
3
                                                                                                                   d)
                                                                                                                  i—i
                                                                                                                  J2
                                                                                                                   (0
                                                                                                                           (C

                                                                                                                           s
                                                                                                                  JJ

                                                                                                                  i

                                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                                  M-l
                                                                                                                  C
S
CO
X  O
d)  O

-------
      Section 144.52(a)(7)  referenced above, states that the permittee
      is required to maintain and show evidence of financial responsibility.
      Financial mechanisms  available to a permit applicant for a UIC
      permit may include surety or performance bonds, which are widely
      used in the business  and industrial ccmmunity, or other assurances,
      such as trust funds,  escrow accounts, letters of credit, or
      financial statements.  These instruments shift the liability for
      risk of damage or nonperformance to a third party, such as a
      bank.  In this way, resources are available to close the well
      properly.

      As one of the objectives of the requirements is to abandon the
      well using sound engineering practices, the regulations also
      require fron the operator a plugging and abandonment plan which
      should include conditions that prevent contamination of USCWs.
      For EPA-administered  programs the Agency is in the process of
      promulgating more specific requirements for Class I hazardous
      waste wells.

      Financial assurance details were available for 8 of the 18 HW
      facilities visited.  Two facilities apparently used a financial
      statement to provide  coverage for abandonment: these were Stauffer
      Chemical in Alabama;  and Allied Chemical in Illinois.  The Chemical
      Resources well in Oklahoma used a letter of credit with a standby
      trust, but no information on the amount was available.  Ducont
      and Monsanto in Texas used an asset trust to prove financial
      responsibility.  Three other facilities - Rollins in Louisiana,
      Gibraltar and Empak in Texas - used bonding ranging fron $75,000 to
      $99,000 to provide coverage for abandonment.  Financial assurance
      had not been required on many injection wells in several States
      in the past.   However, because the coverage for abandoning a well
      in a proper manner will be one of the permit conditions, all the
      wells have to prove financial responsibility and more data will
      become available as new UIC permits are issued, and existing
      wells are reissued permits under the UIC program.

6.9   Class IV Wells

      Under the UIC program a Class TV well is one that injects hazardous
      or radioactive waste into or above a USCW  (40 CFR §144.05(d)).
      Class TV wells were prohibited in 40 CFR §144.13.  Through this
      regulation, all Class IV wells were banned "... except for
      injections associated with Federal activities  [approved under
                                 VI-28

-------
RCRA or CERCIA] designed to clean up an aquifer that has been
contaminated by a hazardous waste site or similar source of
contamination.".  Under §144.23(c) operators are required to plug
and abandon all Class IV wells within six months of the effective
date of the EPA-administered program or within six months after
delegation of the UIC program to a State.  As discussed elsewhere
in this report, the "Hazardous and Solid Wastes Amendment of 1984"
has established a deadline for plugging Class IV wells of May 8,
1985.
                           VI-29

-------

-------
                              APPENDICES
Foreword

     These appendices have been organized in accordance to the 10
specific request for information in Section 701 of the Hazardous
and Solid Waste Mendments of 1984.  Only "raw" data is provided.

Organization

     In accordance to the above paragraph, these appendices are
organized as follows:

Section                              Content

   1                 The location and depth of each well;

   2                 Engineering and construction details of each,
                     including the thickness and composition of its
                     casing, the width and content of the annulus,
                     and pump pressure and capacity;

   3                 The hydrogeological characteristics of the
                     overlying, and underlying strata, as well as
                     that into which the waste is injected;

   4                 The location and size of all drinking water
                     aquifers penetrated by the well, or within
                     a one-mile radius of the well, or within two
                     hundred feet below the well iniection point;

   5                 The location, capacity, and population served
                     by each well providing drinking or irrigation
                     water which is within a five-mile radius of
                     the injection well;

   6                 The nature and volume of the waste injected during
                     the one-year period immediately preceding the
                     date of the report;

   7                 The dates and nature of the inspection of the
                     injection well conducted by independent third
                     parties or agents of State, Federal, or local
                     government;

   8                 The name and address of all owners and operators
                     of the well and any disposal facility associated
                     with it;

-------
                                -2-
Section                              Content

   9                 The identification of all wells at which
                     enforcement actions have been initiated
                     under this Act (by reason of well failure,
                     operator error, aroundwater contamination
                     or for other reasons) and an indentification
                     of the wastes involved in such enforcement
                     actions; and

  10                 Such other information as the Administrator
                     may, in his discretion, deem necessary to
                     define the scope and nature of hazardous
                     waste disoosal in the United States through
                     underground injeciton.

-------
                             SECTION 1
Data on



  " The location and depth of each well;"

-------

-------
                FACILITY NAHE
LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL CLASS I HH HELLS

                HELL NO.           Lat
                                         Long
DEPTH(FT)
Arco Alaska Inc.
Staiifter Cheiical Co.
Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., Main plant
Great Lakes Cheiical Corp., South plant
Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Coipany
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility

SHELL OIL COMPANY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS AND CHEMICAL  CORP.

Kaiser Aluiinui & Cheiical Co.
Monsanto Coipany
 Allied  Chei.  Co.
 Cabot Corp.

 LTV Steel Coipanyt
 Velsicol  Corp.
Bethlehei  Steel  Corporation,Burn  Harbor Plant

General Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing  Co.
Indiana Fara  Bureau  Cooperative
Inland Steel  Coipanyt

niduest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigient  Co.

Uniroyal Inc.  t
United States Steel  Corporation

Shernin Milliais

Vulcan Materials Co.
2t
It

3
1
2

1
2
3X
4
5

 1
 I
 E.I.  Dupont  De Neiours I Co.
 1
 3
 1
 2

 1
 2
' 1
 1
 1
 2

 21
 It
 2
 1
 1
 IN3
 2
 1
 It
 It
 2t
 1
 IN9

 3
 2
 4
 3
 7
 8
 9

 1
 2
70/14/00
70/14/00



33/10/40
33/11/00



38/35/53
35/26/00
27/54/06
30/35/00
30/35/00
30/35/00
40/20/00


41/16/00
39/24/38
39/24/38

41/37/58
37/54/23
37/54/23

37/56/29
41/39/00
41/39/07
41/37/46



41/27/27


37/15/00
37/35/00
27/35/00
37/35/00
37/35/00
38/13/09
38/12/55
148/29/00
148/29/00



93/12/07
92/42/00?



121/14/22
119/15/00
82/00/03
87/15/00
87/15/00
87/15/00
87/45/00


89/20/00
87/41/44
87/41/44

87/07/08
87/55/26
87/55/26-

87/54/36
87/00/00
87/27/12
B7/IO/10



87/21/59


97/25/15
97/25/15
97/25/15
97/25/15
97/25/15
85/50/25
85/50/32
2,217
2,200
4,728
4,330
4,600
3,200
J,003t
2,854
2,860
2,915
1,600
11,420
4,984
1,664
1,808
1,654
4,0001
5,300
5,318
4,368
2,634
6,000
4,290
4,292
2,878
2,806
4,132
2,335t
4,385
4,333
4,296
4,506
4,528
6, 160
4,291
2,427
2,000
4,600
4,750
4,650
4,250
4,600
4,470
4,470

-------
                                 LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL CLASS I HH HELLS
State FACILITY NAHE
LA Aierican Cyanaaid Co.




Arcadian Corporation!
Atlas Processing Co.
BASF Xyandotte Corporation
Borden Cheiical Co.


Browning-Ferris Industries (CEGDS)
Chevron Cheaical Co.

Citgo Petroleua Corp.l



E. I. Oupont, Laplace






Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Seorgia-Pacific Corporation
International Minerals and Cheiical Carp.

Honsanto Cheaical Coapany,Luling plant

NASA, Michoud Asseably Facility*

Rollins Environaental Services of LA,Inc
Rubicon Cheiical Inc.


Shell Cheiical Coapany

Shell oil Coapany, East sits






Shell Oil Coapany, Nest site




Stauffer Cheaical Coapany


HELL NO.
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
0-1
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
4
3
1
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
4
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
5
4
9
2
4
5
6
7
8
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
Lat
29/57/22
29/57/19.2
29/57/15.6
29/57/17
29/56/51.19
30/14/17
32/27/37.61
30/11/52
30/13/50
30/14/00
30/13/50
30/19/13
29/48/00
29/48/00
30/10/26
30/10/26


30/03/21
30/03/10
30/03/53
30/03/48
30/03/35
30/03/09
30/03/34
30/20/32
30/16/58
32/41/32.4
32/41/35.4
29/55/20
29/5//20
30/01/21
30/01/21

30/12/00
30/12/00
30/12/00
30/12/00
30/12/00
30/00/00

30/00/11
30/00/00
30/00/87
30/00/00
30/00/00
30/00/11
30/00/30
30/00/20
30/00/32
30/00/11
30/14/1.51
30/14/2.25
30/14/15.53
Long
90/16/10
90/16/9.6
90/16/9.1
90/60/10.5
90/16/11.36
91/02/30
93/47/21.59
91/00/04
91/00/30
91/00/30
91/00/30
93/18/24
90/00/30
90/00/30
93/19/55
93/19/48


90/31/19
90/31/25
90/31/27
90/31/40
90/31/35
90/31/27.
90/31/f?
91/18/35
91/10/58
92/04/35.22
92/04/34.14
90/21/30
90/21/30
89/54/45
39/54/45

91/00/30-
91/00/30
91/00/12
91/00/00
91/00/11
90/24/00

90/24/32
90/24/00
90/24/22
90/24/00
90/24/40
90/25/32
90/24/30
90/25/35
90/25/20
90/25/32
91/05/57
91/06/3.6
91/06/20.38
DEPTH (i
2,538
3,302
4,815
5,010
4,900
5,012
2,063.81
5,900
3,472
3,200
3,715
4,628
2,852
6,360
4,950
5,000


3, 7501
5,662
5,315
4,960
5,0581
5,132
3,5051
9,2411
3,600
3,350!
3,350
3,401
3,363
6,665
6,665
5,4561
3,547
3,733
5,433
2,5441
1,0221
3,546!
1,824!
1,984!
2,6301
3,166!
3,060!
3,4911
!,Q13
1,6761
1,332
1,384!
2,7701
4,400
4,400
4,502
TENNECQ OIL COR

-------
                                          LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL CLASS  I HN «ELLS
ate
FACILITY NAHE
HELL NO.
Lat
Long
                                                                                                                    DEPTH(FT)


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Mitco Cheiical Corporation, Sretna
Kit co Cheiical Corporation, Hahnville

Hyandotte Cheiical Corporation
BASF Hyandotte


Detroit Cole Coapany


DOM Chei. Co.



E.I. Dupont,Hontaque
Ford Motor Co., Rouge Steel

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis 4 Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleui Inc.l

Velsicol Chei. Corp.
Filtrol Corp.
HERCOFINA



Arico Steel Corp.

Calhio Cheiical Inc.!

Cheiical Haste Nanageient, Inc.



3
4
5
4
2
I
6
1
2
3
7
6
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
8
1
D-l
D-2
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
16
17 A
OB 4
OB 5
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
29/56/00
29/55/57.72
30/06/00
30/06/40
30/06/40
30/06/40
30/06/00
30/12/7.1617
30/12/4.0146
30/12/5.581
30/37/6.26
30/37/15.07
30/37/18.25
29/54/48.72
29/58/51
29/53/55.15


42/37/45
42/37/48

42/17/30





43/23/49

42/18/00






43/22/45
43/22/45










to be deteriined
E9,843.720
£8,137.601
E9, 065. 457
89/58/24.6
89/58/25.8
90/53/00
90/54/17
90/53/50
90/54/05
90/53/00
91/00/16
91/00/12
91/00/14
93/55/27
93/55/28.8
93/55/38.4
90/04/33
90/27/13.8
90/27/14.4


86/07/51
86/08/00

83/06/20





86/24/23

83/09/03



-


84/38/00
84/38/00










to be deterained
N10,937.112
NO, 010. 259
N10.107.79
2,853
2,900
3,6161
3,935
3,950
4,110
3,6501
3,169*
3,7941
4,775»
*9,000
1,081
1,102
7,162*
1,710
3,125*


5,910
5,900
4,231
4,112
4,127

3,978
5,153
5,150
6,432
563
4,308

1,946
1,635
5,930
5,931
1,476
1,244
3,622
3,750
5,671
1025
1011
1050
1025
3,500
3,500
6,072
6,100
2,955
2,961
2,960
2,905

-------
                                            LOCATION AND  DEPTH  OF  ALL  CLASS  I  HN  HELLS
State
FACILITY NAKE
HELL NO.
Lat
Long
DEPTH(FT)
OK
PA
n


Sohio Chaiical Coapany, Vistron


United States Steel Corporation

Agrico Cnei. CD.
Aierican Airlines Inc.

Cheiical Resources Inc.
Kaiser

Rocbell International
Soiex
Haaaeriill Paper Co.

.
A*oco Oil Co.




Arco Che«. CO., Lyondals plant


Badisctie Carp. (Daw Badische Co.)

Braxninq - Ferris Industries
Celanese Cheaical Co.
•


Celanese Cheiical Co., Clear Lake plant

Chaaplin, Soltex 4 ICI, Carpus Chnsti Petro

Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFDI
Cheaical Haste flanageaent
CHEMICAL XASTE KANA8£?Or,lNC

Caiinco Aierican Inc.
Disposal Systejs, Inc.
E. I. Dupont,Beauioant

E. I. Dopant, Houstan plant


E. I. Dupont,Inqleside


L I. Dupont,Sabine River works
5
1A
I
2
3
1
2t
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
S
4
3
2
-1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
10
£5,384.28?
7,637.446



38/35/33.5
38/35/33
T-20N


36/06/25
36/15/40
36/15/40
36/12/00




29/22/07
29/22/09
29/22/36
29/22/38
29/22/30
29/51/45
29/49/01
29/48/52
29/00/16
29/00/16

28/51/22
23/51/47
28/51/13
28/51/29
29/37/34
29/37/43
27/48/40
27/48/40
31/51/24

29/52/15
29/52/15

29/44/10
30/01/08
30/01/09
29/41/53
29/42/07
29/41/52
27/52/23.7
27/52/23.7
27/52/28.7
30/03/29
Nil, 013.977
10,958.318



82/49/16
82/49/17
R-15E Section 9


96/01/10
95/16/55
95/16/55
95/54/00




94/55/40
94/55/40
94/55/14
94/55/14
94/55/24
95/07/34
95/06/28
95/06/24
95/24/02
95/2V05

96/01/07
96/01/20
96/01/09-
96/01/11
95/03/50
95/03/53
'7/36/03
97/36/03
102/19/38
27/42/48
94/06/00
94/06/00

95/05/30
94/01/43
94/01/51
95/02/22
95/02/17
95/02/25
97/14/33,4
97/14/22.9
97/14/37.8
93/44/49
2,943
2,965
3,135
3,170
3,170
5,617
5,568
2,733
3,093
3,036
3,364
820
789
3,100
2,054
1,601
1,600
1,450


7,000
' 4,459
6,950
4,677
7,242
7,223
7,420
6,200

3,430
5,939
3,780
3fff*
, J«J
5,425
5,420
7,450
7,497
5,715
4,300
7204


7,300
4,962
5,015
7,000
7,000
5,770
5,268
5,2991
5,2551
5,648

-------
                                  LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL CLASS  I HH HELLS
                FACILITY NAME
HELL NO.
Lat
Long
                                                                                                            DEPTH(FT)
E. I. Dupont,Victoria
E«pak, Inc.
General Aniline and Fill Corp.
Silbraltar Hastsnaters, Inc.
Hal one Service Co.

flerichei co.
Monsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou
Honsanto Co.

Phillips Chetical Co.

Potash Co. of Aaerica Division
Shell Cheiical Co.

SONICS INTERNATIONAL

Velsicol Cheaical Co.


Vistron Corporation
Haste-water Inc.
Nitco Cheiical Co.,Houston

Hi tea Cheiical Co.,Marshall
9
8
7
6
ADN3
4
5
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
4t
1
2
3
1
2
D-2
D-3
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
2
30/03/06
30/03/06

30/03/25
30/03/30
30/03/24
30/03/28
28/40/35
28/40/25
28/40/28
28/40/14
28/40/08
28/40/21
28/40/34
28/40/32
28/39/58
28/40/16
29/44/25
29/25/30
29/25/23
29/25/41
32/27/42


29/45/34

29/14/51
29/15/20
29/15/32
29/22/39
29/22/33
35/43/06
35/43/10
35/56/16
29/43/37
29/43/06



29/58/11

28/33/57
28/31/00
28/34/03
29/15/50
29/34/48
29/34/45
32/26/23
32/36/26
93/45/18
93/44/30

93/45/28
93/45/32
93/45/15
93/45/30
96/57/08
96/57/27
96/57/05
96/57/30
96/57/39
96/57/14
96/57/28
96/57/12
96/56/50
96/57/45
95/05/40
94/57/59
94/57/51
94/57/31
95/10/48


95/10/40

95/12/49
95/12/45
95/12/10
94/53/47
94/53/28.7
101/25/36
101/25/51
101/57/26
95/07/30 -
95/07/24



94/03/36?

96/50/14
96/50/14
96/50/08
95/49/36
95/26/07
95/26/05
91/21/00
94/20/59

5,063

4,750
5,019
5,059
4,762 t
4,693
4,752.6
4,690
4,219
3,810
3,980
4,5551
4,000 t
4,705
4,875
7,518
4,028
1,160
3,912

7,000
5,124
7336
6,175 proposed
6,409
4,8151
12,750
7,1861
7,069
5,075
5,075
1,265
7,645
7,645



6,010
5,750 .
8,250
7,973
7,530
6,450
7,180
7,410
6t601
2,526
HYCON CHEMICAL COMPANY

-------

-------
                             SECTION 2
Data on
   "Engineering and construction details of each, including the
   thickness and composition of its casing, the width and content
   of the annulus, and Dump pressure and capacity;"

-------

-------
;ate
         ENGINEERING DETAILS-SURFACE CASING INFORMATION, CLASS  I HU

FACILITY NAKE                     WELL NO.     DIRK.       depth
                         grade
cemented to surf
        Oreo Alaska  Inc.
        Stauffer Cheaical  Co.
        Ethyl Corp.
        Great Lakes  Chemical  Corp.,  tain plant
        Great Lakes  Chemical  Corp.,  South plant
        Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Company
        Rio  Bravo  Disposal Facility

        SHELL OIL  COMPANY
        U.S. CORP. OF  ENGINEERS  AND CHEMICAL CORP.
                           %
        Kaiser Aluainui  4 Chemical Co.
        Monsanto Company
        Allied Chen. Co.
        Cabot Corp.

        LTV Steel Company*
        Velsicol Corp.
        Bethlehea Steel Corporation,Bum Harbor Plant

        General Electric

        Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
        Indiana Fara Bureau Cooperative
        Inland Steel Ccapany*

        Midwest Steel
        Pfizer Mineral and Pignent Co.

        Uniroyal Inc. *
        United States Steel Corporation

        SherMin Williams
                                  2*
                                  It

                                  3
                                  1
                                  2

                                  1
                                  2
                                  3X
                                  4
                                  5

                                  1
                                  1
                                  1
                                  3
                                  1
                                  2

                                  1
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  1
                                  2

                                  2*
                                  1*
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  IN3
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1*
                                  1*
                                  2*
                                  1
                                  IN9

                                  3
13.37
13.37

16
16
16

13.38
10.75
10.75
10.75
9.63

12.75
13.38
30
2*
16

19.63
16
8.63
13.38
8.63
13.38

13.37
20
13.38
8.63
8.62
10.75
13.37
16
16
16
20
10.75
16

10.75
100
100
150
32
125
160
1,005.4
103
1,071
907
970
2,566
202
106
86
110
2,273
280
816
300
417
77
219
20
186
412
105
800
168
180
310
341
498
170
226





48t
401


361
N-40,461
CSD 64i544

carbon stl
carbon stl
steel
K-55,36**

24*
H-40,481


H-40,4fi*
API,STD
B-40,48*
K-55,24*
H-40,331
H-40,48*
H-40,65*
J,26i



H-40,55*
API





y




y
n
y
y
y
y
y
y

y
y

y
y

y
y
y
y
y


y

Y
                                                           Page  1

-------
                                   EN6INEEHINB DETfllLS-SUfffiCE CflSING IffORHflTION, CLASS I HW
State
                FACILITY NOC
WELL NO.
DIAM.
depth
grade
resented to surf
KY
LA
          Vulcan Materials Co.
LI. Oupont Oe Neaours i Co.
finerican Cyanaiid Co.
          Arcadian Corporation*
          fit las Processing Co.
          BflSF Wyandotte Corporation
          Borden Cheaical Co.
          Browning-Ferris Industries (CECCS)
          Chevron Cheaical Co.

          Citgo Petroieui Corp.*
          E. I. Dupont, Laplacs
          Ethyl Cora, of Baton Souge
          Georgia-Pacific Corporation
          International Minerals and Cheaical Corp,

          Monsanto Cheaical Coapany,Luling plant

          NASA, Michoud Assesbly Facility*

          Rollins Environmental Services of LA, Inc
          Rubicon Chesical Inc.
2
4
3
7
a
9
i
2
9.63
16
10.75
16
18
ia
18
18
200
163.56
401
156
165
157
125
125
steel
API, 65*
H-40, 33*
API, 50*
API, 65*
API, 64*
H-40
H-40
y
y
Y
y
y
Y
y
y
             20
             20
           106.55
           94.72
3
4
5
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
i
2
2
1
1
1
2
20
20
24
20

10.75
13.38
13.38
9.63
10.75
16
13.33
24
24

20
16
16
16
16
16
16
20
16
16
16
12.38
20
16
16
13.38
13.38
10.75
100
147
144
200

900
1,010
1,016

2,554
134
518
SO
70

90
100
100
100
118
£8
114
116
791
610
81
1,235
109
&0
60
2,505
302
809





4-J
H-40, 48*
H-40, 47i
K-55
J-55,41*
75*
61



65*
65* '
65*
65*
65*
65 ,41*
55*

H-40, 654

Nft
K-55, 55*



551
K-55,3S*
K-55, 36*



y

y
y


y
y
y








Y


y
n
n




y


                                                             Page 2

-------
         ENGINEERING DETfllLS-SURFflCE CASING IfFORKflTIQN, CLASS  I HW




RCILrrir'NflHE                    HELL NO.      DIM.        depth
grade
cesented to surf

Shell Cheoical Coapany

Shell Oil Company, East site






Shell Oil Company, West site




Stauffer Chemical Coaoany


TENNECQ OIL COMPLY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Witco Chemical Corporation,3retna
Witco Chenical Corporation, Hah nvi lie

ityandotte Chenical Corporation
BflSF Uyandotte


Detroit Coke Coapany


DOM CheM. Co,


3
4
5
4
5
6
7
a
9
2
8
I
5
6
9
a
i
3
?
3
4
5
4
^
i
6
a
3
1
7
6
5
1
I
a
D-e
i
a .
3
1
2
3
5
2
4

10.75
13.38
14
20
20
20
20
20
14
16
IB
20
20
IS
16
16
16

13.38
13.38
24
16
13.38
20
24
13.38
13.38
13.38
16
8.63
16
10.75
10.34
9.63

10.75
10.75
10.75
13.38
13.75
13.63
13.38
11.75
18

880
1,011
100
118
106
121
145
145
100
166
120
117
97
152
72
67
79

1,320
1,365
83
1,008
1,800
60
38
885
850
884
212
156
997
2,212
1,257
1,257

539
535
585
121
96
113
1,382
1,388
86.7

K-55,411

551
551
551
J-55,78t
B,94i
ft, 94*
551

39i
-------
State
         ENGINEERING  DETRILS-SURFflCE CfiSING IffOBWTION, CLASS I HH




FflCIllTY NRHE                    WELL NO.     DlflH.        depth
              grade
               ceaented  to surf

E.I. Dupont,Montaque
Ford Motor Co., Rouge Steel

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis I Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleua Inc.*

Velsicol Chen. Corp.
ffi • Filtrol Corp.
NC HESCCFINfl



OH Sraco Steel Core.

Cilhio Cfieaical Inc.*

Chemical Waste Management, Inc.





Sohio Cheaical Ccspany, Vistron


United States Steel Corporation

OK flgrico Che». co.
ftaerican flirlines Inc.

Chesicai Resources Inc.
Kaiser

Rockwell International
Scsex
a
i
D-l
D-2
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
OB 5
16
17 fl
QB 4
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
2
. 3
1
2*
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
10.75
20
7
13.38
10.75
10.75
10.5
24
20
10.25
10.75
20
10.75
20
20
24"
18
20
13.38
'13.38
10.75
16
10.75
13.75
10.75
10.75
10.75
10.75
10.38
10.38
10
10.75
10.75
20
13.37
10,75
8.63
13.38
8. S3
10.75
10.75
1,380
106
483
137
640
152
125
50
41
340
452
65
713
31
85
350
127
35

298
512
40
651
629
661
646
654
629
434
504
507
500
500
40
460
416
127
50
397
417
176
40.54

24*
H-40, 48*
J-55,41*
H-40, 32*
424
H
N,904
4£i

MR, 60*
Y-3,32*
5-6






32.75*

464
4-40,41*
H-40,41*
H-40,41*
41*
H-40,41*
H-40
H-40

J-55,41*
J-55,41*
X-42,65*
Steel, 55*

steel

J-55,24*
40.5
29.44




y
Y

y

y
y



Y
Y
Y
Y
y
y
n
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y "
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
                     Paper Co.
                                              13.37
58
H-40,40*
                                                            Page 4

-------
;ate
         ENGINEERING DETfllLS-SURFflCE CflSINS INFQRWTION, CLfiSS I HW

FPCILITTHWE                     HELL"NO.      DIffit.        derth
grade
cemented to surf
        Araoco Oil Co.
        flrco Chen. CO., Lyondale plant
        Badische Corp. (Do* Badische Co.)

        Browning - Ferris Industries
        Celanese Cheoiical Co.
        Celanese Chemical Co.,Clear Lake plant

        Chaaplin, Soltex  i ICI, Corpus Christi Petro

        Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFD*
        Cheaical Waste Managerent
        CHEMICAL HflSTc JWNflGEMENT, INC

        Cosinco American Inc.
        Disposal Systeus, Inc.
        E. I. Dupont, Beauaount

        E. I. Dupont,Houston plant


        £. I. Dupont, Ingleside


        E. I. Dupont,Sabine River works
        E. I. Dupont, Victoria
                                  2
                                  1

                                  5
                                  4
                                  3
                                  2
                                  1
                                  3
                                  2
                                  1
                                  2
                                  1
                                  i
                                  4
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  1
                                  2
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  1
                                  1
                                  2
                                  I
                                  1
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  3
                                  1
                                  2
                                  9
                                  10
                                  a
                                  7
                                  6
                                  ADN3
                                  5
                                  4
                                  2
                                  3
13.37
13.37
13.37
13.38
10.75
IS
13.38
13.38
13.38
10.75
10.75
13.38
13.38
13.38
10.75
13.38
10.75
10.75
13.38
10.75
10.625
8.63
13.38
13.38
10.75
10.75
13.37
13.38
13.38
13.38
18.63
13.38
13.38
9.63
13.38
9.63
13.38
10.75
10.75
79
40
1,429
1,328
1,4%
2,003
2,561
2,526
1,500
1,327
1,389
1,394
1,368
1,760
1,568
1314
790
800
407
586
1006
2,827
1,617
1,627
1,103
1,342
1,485
1,020
1,018
1,070

1-,605
2,596
1,638
1,640
1,638
1,616
1,951
1,993
K-40,40#
H-40,40f
K-55,W.5#
K-55,54.4i
H-40,33*
J-55
K-55,611
K-55,Blf
48«


H-40,40*
H-40
H-40,33t
H-W,48I
K-S,41f
K-55,SttC
unknown

CflRB. STEEL
K-55
H-40,48#
K-55 -

32.751
K-55
K-55
H-40, 4816
K-55, 86*
J-55, 544
J-55, 544
J-55, 40*

40*, J-55
J-55, 48*
J-55, 41*
J-55, 41*


y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y

y
y
Y
y


y

y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
                                                           Page 5

-------
                                  EN6INEESINS DETSILS-SLRFflCE CfiSINS WFDRHHTION, CLflSS I KW
State
FflCILITY NME
WELL NO.
OlflM.
depth
grade
cemented to sun








capak, Inc.
General Aniline and Fila Corp.


Silbraltar Uaste»aters, Inc.
telone Servica Co.

tenches co.
Monsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou



Monsanto Co.

Phillips Cheaical Co.

Potash Co. of flserica Division
Shell Cheszcal Co.

SONICS IHTEWflTIQKflL

Velsicol Chesical Co.


Vistron Corporation


Waste-water Inc.
Witco Chesical Co., Houston

Uiteo Cheaical Co., Marshall

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
D-3
1
1
2
i
2
2
1
4
2
1
2
3
1
2
1 .
3
2
10.75
9.53
9.63
9.53
10.75
10.75
13.75
10.75
10.76
13.38
13.38
13.33

10.33
10.33
10.75
13.38
30
18
10.75
13.38
13.38
16
15
a. s
10.75
13.38



13.38
13.38
13.38
13.38
13.38
9.53
10.75
8.53
10.75
3.52 "
2,4€2
2,000
2,002
2,002
1,977
2,46£
2,016
2,449
2,830
1,043
931
1,230

1,212
1,200
2,727
100
60
20
2,002
1,578
1,555
720
720
1,110
2,957
3,026



1,531
1,656
-1,800
1,325
1,726
1,360
2,590
2,650
663
703
J-55,411
40t
H-40,32t
H-40,32i
H-40,41*
J-55,41*
K-55,55*
J-55,41f
J-55
45*
68*
54.54

H-40
K-55,464




H-40, 411

J-55, 55*
J-55, 75*
J-55, 75*
K-55,244
J-55, 411
J-55



K-55,55*
K-33,351
H-40, 43*




K-55


y
y
Y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y



y

y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y



y
y

y
y
y
y
y
V
J
y
          «YCCN OBHCfiL
                                                            Page &

-------
State

flK


AL



AR
CA
CO
Ft
IL
IN
                                   ENGINEERING DETAILS-INTERMEDIATE STRING,CLASS  I MU

                          FACILITY NflME                     WELL NO.     DIflMETER
KS
          Arco Alaska Inc.
          Stauffer Cheaical Co.
          Ethyl Corp.
          Great Lakes Che»ical Corp., Main plant
          Great Lakes Chemcal Corp., South plant
          Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Company
          Rio Bravo Disposal Facility

          S*£LL OIL COMPANY
          U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS AND D€MICflL CORP.

          Kaiser Aluainua  4 Chemical Co.
          Monsanto Company
          Allied Che».  Co.
          Cabot Corp.

          LTV Steel Coapany*
          Velsicol Corp.
          Bethlehei Steel Corporation, Burn Harbor Plant

          General Electric

          Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
          Indiana Fan Bureau Cooperative
          Inland Steel Coipany*

          MidNest Steel
          Pfizer Mineral and Piguent Co.

          Uniroyal Inc. t
          United States Steel Corporation

          Sherwin Uilliais
2*
1*
                                                                         5.5
                                                                                       2,200
M-80, 17*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1
10.75
10.75
10.75
8.63
7
7
7
7
8.63
7.63
1,312
1,237.78
1,334
3,200
2,996
2,851
2,854
2,915.02
1,563
11,385
J-55
H-40
J-55
32*
26*
23*
steel
23*
22*
OK 39434*



y




y
n
1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2*
1*
2
1
1
IN3
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
IN9
3
10.75
IB
18
10
7
10.3
5.5
9.63
4.5
9.63
9.63
10.75
9.63
4.5
5.5
5.5

10.75
10.5
10
13.37
7
10.75
7.63
2,933
1,190
982
1,395
3,700
1,590
4,597
2,703
1,540
500
1,424
3,800
2,986
2,760
3,418
2,335.

800
400
605
645
5,450
811
1,423
K-55,40.5
ASTM A53
carbon stel
steel
K-55,26#

J-55, 14*
J-55, 36*
,

J-55, 36*
H-40, 32*
K-55,47*

K-55, 17*
H-40, 14*

H-40, 33*
J,26*

54*

H-40, 41*
API
y
y
y
y

y

y
y

y
y


y


y





Y
                                                         Page 1

-------
                                 ENGINEERING DeTfllLS-INTBWEDIflTE STRING, CLASS I HU
state                    FSCILITY'NBE                    UELL NO.     DIOCTER
KY
Lfl

Vulcan Materials Co,




LI. Duoont De Neaours i Co.

flaerican Cyanaiid Co.




flrcadian Corporation*
fttlas Processing Co.
BflSF Uyandotte Corporation
Borden Cheaical Co.


Browung-ferris Industries (CECCS)
Chevron Chwical Co.

Citgo Petroleui Corp.*-


E. I. Dupont, Laplace






Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Seorgia-Pacific Corporation
International Minerals and Qeaical Corp.

Monsanto Chesical Coapany, Ltil ing plant

NftSfl, Hichoud Assesfaly Facility*

Rollins Environaental Services of LA, Inc
Rubicon Cheaical Inc.

2
4
3
7
a
9
i
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
7.63
10.75

10.75
13.38
13.38
11.75
11.75
11.75
11.75
13.38
13.38
15
13.38


9.63
9.63

7
10.75
9.63
16
16

13.38
9.53
9.63
10.75
10.75
10.75
10.75
13.38
9.63
10.75
10.75
9.63
13.38
11.75
11.75



1,500
933

981
980
950
430
430
2,538.56
3,275.33
1,200
1,252
1,177
1,582

395
3,330
3,330

2,527"
449
2,710
1,123
1,101

1,000
1,028
1,006
1,014
1,048
1015
1,014
1,338
3,323
2,447
2,495
3,277
1,235
1,174
1,174



steel
flPI,40.5*

flPI,40.5*
flPI, 48*
API, 48*
H-40
H-40
J-55, 47*
J-55
H-40, 48*
55*
65*
J-55

40*
C-75,3S
C-75,K-55

K-55,26*
41*
36
H-40, 65*
H-40, 65*

H-40, 48*
32.75*
33*
40.5*
40.5*
405 ,23*
41*
K-52,55*
J-55, 36*
K-55,41*
X-55,40.34
K-55,40*
55*
J-55, 473
J-55, 47*



y
y

y
Y
Y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y


y
y
y


y
y

y

y
Y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y

y
y
y



                                                      Page 2

-------
State
         ENGINEERING DETfllLS-INTEWOIflTE STRING, CLflSS I KW




FflCILITY NttC                    HELL NO.     DIflXETER
HI

Shell Cheaical Company

Shell Oil Coapany, East site






Shell Oil Coapany, West site




Stauffer Cheaical Coapany


TENNECO OIL COHPflNY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Uitco Cheaical Corporation, Gretna
Uitco Cheaical Corporation,Hahnville

Uyandotte Chemical Corporation
BASF Uyandotte


Detroit Coke Company


DOM Che*. Co.


3
4
5
4
5
&
7
a
9
2
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1
7
6
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
13.38
7.63
9.63
9.63
13.38
13.38
13.38
13.38
13.38
9.63
10.75
10.75
13.38
13.38
10.75
10.75
10.38
10.75

8.63
8.63
16
10.38
10.75
13.38
16



10.75
7

7
7
7

7


8.63
9.53
9.63
8.63
8.63
10.75
870
2,995
3,711
1,000
1,004
1,019
1,019
1,018
1,014
1,000
1,345
1,840
975
1,020
1,322
908
900
1,002

2,850
2,900
1,230
2,712
3,950
1,939.6
1,185



1,955
1,100

7,257
3,637
3,641

4,606


1,774
631
872
3,980
3,740
1,380
K-55,55i
N-80,26i
36,40,44 Is
H-40,32!
J-55,55t
J-55,481

K-55,551
K-55,55t
H-5-40,32t
K-55,41t
41f,J-55
48»,J-55
55f,J-55
K-55,41f
8R,41 t 48*5
411
J-55,40.5t

J-55,281
J-55,281
H-40,65*
41t
k-55,41t
J-55,55t
651




J-55,26f

23 t 26 Is
23 i 251s
23 4 2&*s

J-55,23*


J-55,24t
H-40,32t
H-40,32f
J-55,36i
J-55,36t
J-55,41t
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y

y
y
y
y
Y
y
y






y
y
y




y
n
y



                                                        Page3

-------
State
                       EN6IJGRIN6 DETfllLS-INTSWDIflTE STRING, CUSS I HW




               FflCILITY «WE                   HELL NO.     DIWETER

E.I. Dupont,«ontaque
Ford fetor Co., Rouge Steel

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis i Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleum Inc.*

Velsicol DIM. Corp.
>6 Filtrol Corp.
1C KERCCFINfl



OH flrico Steel Corp.

Calhio Cheaical Inc.*

Cheaical Waste Management, Inc.





Sohio Cheaical Company, Vistron


United States Steel Corporation

CK flgrico Dies. co.
flier ican flir lines Inc.

Qie»ical Resources Inc.
Kaiser

Rockwell International
So«ex
a
i
D-l
D-a
i
i
i
2
4
2
i
i
i
i
OB 5
15
17 A
OB 4
1
2
1
2
&
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
Z
3
1
2*
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
7
13.38
5.5
9.&3
5.5
7
7
13.38
13.38
7

13.38
7
13.38
5
3'
12
6
9.53
9.53
7
10.75
7
7
7
7
7

7
7
7


13.38
9.63
7
t? c
J* tj



1
4,898
790
192
664
2,538
1,649
1,435
279
277
1,275

510
3,414
1,627
999
855
852
999

2,546
5,950
490
2,730
2,370
2,364
2,384
2,728

2,783
2,311
2,506


200
1,740
1,807
2,093



1,729
20*
K-55,35*

tWO, 381
K-55, 14*
J-55,23*

N,43*
N,43f
171

H-40,48*
K-55, 23*
H-40






254
H-40,33*
J-35,2:3t

J-55,231
J-55,234
J-55,23*

J-55,20*
K,20f



K-55, 544
K-55
J-55,20*
steel 15.3



J-55,20*




y
Y

y
y
y

y




Y

y
y
n
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y


y
y
y
y



y
Pfl
Hanemill Pacer Co.
2,179
J-55,234        y
                                                    Page 4

-------
                                   ENGINEERING DETRILS-INTERICDIflTE STRING, CLASS I HU
State
n
FflClLITY NAME


flnoco Oil Co.




ftrco Che*. CO., Lyondale plant


Badische Corp. (Dow Badische Co. )

, Browning - Ferris Industries
Celanese Chenical Co.



Celanese Che»ical Co., Clear Lake plant

Chaiplin, Soltex t ICI, Corpus Christ i Petro

Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFD*
Chenical Waste Kanagenent
CHEMICAL UflSTE MANAGEMENT, INC

Ccainco filer ican Inc.
Disposal Systess, Inc.
E. I. Dupont, Beaiuwunt

E. I. Dupont, Houston plant


E. I. Dupont, Ingleside


E. I. Dupont, Sabine River works







E. I. Dupont, Victoria

WELL NO.
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
8
7
6
QDN3
5
4
2
3
DIfil€TER
7
7





7.63
none '
none
9. S3
7

7.63
9.63
9.63
9.63

9.63
7.63
7.63
7
7
7.625


5.5
NO
NA
7.63
7.63
9.67

3.63
Nfl
11.75



5.5
9.63
5.5
9.63
Nfl
Nfl
•
5,100
2,106





6,960
3

6,900
6,195

3,368
5,635
3,750
3,710

5,124
7,114
7,191
4,875,4,808
4,770
69%


7,104

"
5,170
4,342
4,879

5,114





4,512
2,717
4,500
4,877


•
J-55,23*
J_55,23t





J-55







J-55,40i
J-55

J-55, 40. 51
K-55,26*
K-55
K-55

CflRB. STEEL


K-55/FSP



K-55, 26. 4#




K-55,54#



J-55, 171
401
171, J-55
J-55,40t


C
y






y


y
y


y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
Y









y





y
y
y
y


                                                         Pane 5

-------
State
        EN6ICEHING DETfllLS-INTEfoOIffTE STRING, OflSS I HU




FfiCILITY WWE                   HELL NO.     DIWETER
Espak, Inc.
General Aniline and Fila Corp.
Si 1 oral tar Wastewaters, Inc.
flalone Service Co.

tericiiet eo.
fonsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou



fansanto Co.

Phillies Cheaical Co.

Potash Co. of floerica Division
Shell Cheaical Co.

SQNICS IMTERNflTlONftL
Velsicol Cheaical Co.


Vistron Corporation


Waste-water Inc.
Uitco Cheaical Co. , Houston

Uitco Cheaical Co., Marshall

5
6
7
8
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
I
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
0-2
D-3
1
1
2
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
2
Nft
NA
Sfl
.Nfl
Nfl
Nfl
Nfl
NA

7
7

9.63
IS
10.75






7
8.63


9.53
9.63
9.63
9.63
9.63
5.62
7

4.5
5.5


5,120
7,000

1,700
1,547
2,011






7, £45
7,650


5,577

"6,000
7,478
6,382
6,100
7,180

6,601
2,434


J-55,26i
K-55,cS*

K-55,40*
N-50,51*
H-40,40*






tt-80,23*
N-30

-
J-55, 36i
J-55,3£t
M-80, 47i












y
y
y







y



y

y
y
y
y



         «YCON DOICSL
                                                     Page

-------
                                  ENGINEERING DETBILS-IONG STRING  INFORHflTION,CLfiSS  I HW
State
PK

flL


AR



Cfl

CO

R.



IL





IN












FflCILITY NfiXE
flrco Alaska Inc.

Stauffer Cheaical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Chenical Corp., Main plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., South plant

Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Coapany
Rio Bravo Disoosal Facility
SHELL OIL COMPflNY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS AND CHEMICAL CORP.
Kaiser Aluainua £ Chenical Co.
Monsanto Coapany


Allied Chea. Co.
Cabot Corp.

LTV Steel Coapany*
Velsicol Corp.

Bethlehea Steel Cor por at ion, Burn Harbor Plant

General Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Far* Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Coapany*

Midwest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigaent Co.

Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
WELL NO.
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
5
1
1


1
3
1
2
1
2
1
I
1
2
2*
1*
2
1
1
IN3
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
IN9
DIAMETER
5.5

7
7
7





5


7.63
10.75*
12
10
7
7.63

7

7
7
7




9.62
7
7
7
8.62

7.38
M
2,217
1,960
4,720
2,988.9
4,600





11,420


4,008
1,314.5*
872-1,390
1,415
3,537
3,160

3,066

2,440
2,510
2,201




2,495
2,283
2,750
2,505
2,590

2,360
*
N-80, 171
J-55, 4. 7*
K-55
J-55
J-55





N-80, IS


N-80, 26
ASTH-A53B-E*
cs/ss
steel
fibgl,12#


J-55,23i


J-55, 23*
J-55,2Si




K-55, 361
J-55, 26*
J,26t

K-55, 244

J-55,26t
C










n


y


y

y

y


y
y




y
y





KS
Sherxin Williams
                                                          Page 1

-------
State
        ENGINEERING DETfllLS-LONG STRING INFQSWflTIDN,CLASS  I  HH




FACILITY WK                     WELL NO.     DIAMETER
KY
LA

Vulcan Materials Co.




£. I. Dupont De Newurs 4 Co.

AKrican Cyanaaid Co.




Arcadian Corporation*
Atlas Processing Co.
BflSF Wyandotte Corporation
Bcrrien Cheiical Co.


Browning-Ferris Industries (CECOS)
Chevron Qieaical Co.

Citgo Petroleua Corp.*


E. I. Dupont, Lao lacs






Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
International Minerals and Chesical Corp.

Monsanto Cheaical Ccaoany,Luling plant

NflSfl, Wichoud ftssesbly Facility*

Rollins Environmental Services of LA, Inc
Subicon Chemical Inc.

2
4
3
7
a
9
1
2
1
2
3
4
5 '
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2

7
7
7
9.63
9.53
3.63
3.63
9.63
9.63
9.63
9.63
13.38
9.53

7



7
7.63
7
10.75
10.75

9.63
5.5
5.5
7
7
7
7
9.63
5.5
7/6.75
7/6.75

9.63
7.63
7.63
9.63
9.63
7

3,979
4,124
3,950
3,950
3,950
3,115
3,115
2,292
3,215
4,196
4,144
4,015
4,300

1,700



3,633
2,749
6,346
4,740
4,773

5, 070
5,497
5,140
4,826
5,226
5225
5,203
3,939
3,441
3,723/3,734
3714/3775

3,277
6,550
6,590
5,456
3,547
3,625

26*
J-55,26*
API, 264
API, 36*
API, 364
H-40
H-40
36*

K-55, 36*
K-55, 40*
k-55
K-55

20*



HHQ,2S*
c6»
29
K-55, 46*
K-55, 41-50*

40*
17*
17*
23*
26*
23* t 26*
23*
54* J 44*
J-55, 144
K-55,26*/55
K-55, 26*

40*
J-55,26»
J-55,26*
J-55, 36*
K-55, 364
K-55, 20423*

y
Y
y
Y
Y
y
y
y
y

y
y


y



y
y
y

y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
n
y
y

y
n
y
y


                                                           Page 2

-------
State
        ENGINEERING DETfilLS-LONS STRING  INFORMATION, CLASS I HW

FflCIUTY «WE                     WELL NO.     DTRWETER

Shell Chenical Company

Shell Oil Company, East site






Shell Oil Company, West site




Stauffer Cheiical Coapany


3
4
5
4
5
6
7
a
9
2
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
l
3
9.62

7
7
9.53
9.63
9.63
9.63
9.63
7
7
7.63
9.63
9.63
7
7
7
7
5,300

2,600
1,9840
3,517
3,488
3,579
3,585
3,590
2,000
2,999
1,608
1,797
i,602
2,919
4,400
4,400
4,500
K-55,40*

N-80,26#
H-40, 171
J-55,36*
K-55,36*
K-55,36i
K-55,36*
K-55,36*
H-40, 171
8* fbergls
39t,P-110
18t,J-55
36#,J-55
fibgls,8*
26*
23 4 25 *s
J-55,26#
y

y
n
y
y
y
y
y
n
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
          TEWECQ OIL COMPWY
          Texaco Inc.
          Uniroyal  Inc.


          Universal Oil  Products


          Witco Cheaical Corporation,Gretna
          Witco Cheaical Corporation,Hahnvilie

          Uyandotte Cheaical  Corporation

          BflSF tyandotte


          Detroit Coke Coaipany


          DOM Chen.  Co.
3
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1
7
6
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4


10.38
7
7
9.53
10.38
9.63
9.63
9.53
7.63

10.75





7
7

7
7.63
7

7


3,950
2,185
3,536
4,050
3,966
3,614
4,670
3,070
8,991

1,101





4,700
4,340

4,109
3,750
3,690

4,967


J-55,41#
K-55,25i
N-BO,23#
K-55,36#
J-55,41i
35*
J-55,36#
K-55,36«
-

K-55,36#





J-55,23i
K-55,23*

K-40,23#
J-55
J-55,20*

J-55, 23*


y
n
N
y
y-
y
y
y








y
y

y
y
n


                                                         Pace 3

-------
                                ENGINEERING DETfllLS-iONG STRING INRBWflTIW, CLASS I  HH




Stats                    FflCILlTY Nflffi                    WELL NO.     DIfflCTER

£. I. Dupont,?!ont3que
Ford Botor Co., Rouge Steel

Kostuns Manufacturing Co.
Parks Davis i Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleui Inc.*

Velsicol Dies. Corp.
MS Filtrol Corp,
NC HERCDFINfl



OH ftraco Steel Corp.

Calhio Cheaical Inc.*

Chesical Waste Management, Ire.





Schio Chesncai Cctioany, Vistron


- United States Steel Corporation

CK flgrico Chea. co.
fiaerican flirlines Inc.

Cheaical -Resources Inc.
Kaiser

fockxell International
Scsex
8
I
D-i
D-2
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
OB 5
IS
17 fl
OB 4
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1

7
5.5
5.5

4.5

3.53
8.52

7
7

9.63




7


1
5

5
5
m
7



7
7
9. S3
9. S3

4.5
3.63

7
6. S3

5,460
472
4,307

1,648

2,000
2,008

1,025
3,326

4,413







5,410
Nfl

2,310
2,310
m
2,370



5,517
5,568
1,506
1,770

2,071
353

1,306
1,729-1,1751

K-55,264
K-55, 14*
K-55,15.5*

10.5*

N,244
N,24*


K-55, 231

K-55







K-S,25*
Nfl

J-55, 154
J-55, 15*
NA




!*-60,2S4
N-80,26*
K-55,:^»
40*

stall 10. 2S*
H-40,32«

J-55, £01
scn-40





Y

y
N

y




















y
y
y


n
y

y

Pfl       Haafflerrill Paper  Co.                             3           9.62         1,393            J-55,364
                                                       Page 4

-------
Stats
        ENGINEERING DETflILS-lON6 STRING INFORMflTION, CUSS




FRC1UTY Nfi&E                    WELL NO.      DIWETER
                                                                                I HW


TX teoco Oil Co.




flrco Chen. CO., Lyondale plant


Badisdie Corp. (Dow Badisdie Co. )

Browning - Ferris Industries
Celanese Cheiical Co.



Celanese Cheaical Co., Clear Lake plant

Chaplin, Soltex i.ICI, Corpus Christi Petro

Chaoarral Disposal Co. (BFD*
Cheaical Waste Management
CHEMICM. HflSTE mNflGBENT, INC

Coainco Anerican Inc.
Disposal Systeas, Inc.
E. I. Dupont, BeauBount

E. I. Dupont, Houston plant


E. I. Dupont, Ingleside


E. I. Dupont, Sabine River works






E. I. Dupont, Victoria

2
1
5
4
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
. 1
1
1
1
2
1
1 •
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
8
7
6
ADN3
5
2
3
9.62
9.62


9.62
9.62
7.63

9.63
9.63







7

3.5
5.9116
9.6

4.5



9.63
9.63



9.63
6.63
3.63 •
11.75
9.63
8.63


7.63
5.5
7
7
2,538
1,359


6,649
6,102
6,959

7,233
7,228







5,491

7,470
9,494
5,798

6885



4813
4,847



5,055
5,120
5,031

3,682
2,424


2,507-4,271
6,22
4,651
4,752
J-55,36i
J-55,36*


N-80
K-55,N-80
J-55,C75

K-55, 36*
K-55, 36*







J-55,23i

SS-316,9i
SS-316
unknown

FIBERGLASS



K-55
K-55



K-55
K-55
K-55, 3616
N-80,60*
J-55,40t
J-55-321


N-80,25.4*
171, Carp 20
J-55,23*
J-55,23i
y
y


n
y
n

y
y







y

n
n
y










y

y





y
y
y
y
                                                       Page 5

-------
Stats
FflCILITY N»E
                                 DETfllLS-LGNS STRING INFOflNRTION, OASS I  HH




                                              WELL NO.     DIftCTES








Efloak, Inc.
General Aniline and Fila Corp.


Silbraltar Uastewatsrs, Inc.
teione Service Co.

tenches co.
ftonsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou



Monsanto Co,

Phillips Chetical Co.

Potash Co, of flnerica Division
Shell Chesical Co.

SCNICS INTERNflTIDNflL

Velsicol Che*ical Co.


Vistron Corporation
-

Waste-water Inc.
Uitco Cheaical Co,, Houston

Uitco Cheaical Co., Marshall
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
t
i
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
D-3
1
1
2
1
2
2
i
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
7
5.5
5.5
5.5
7
7
9.63
7
7
9.63
9.53
9.63



7
7
10.75
7
7
9.63
9.63
10.75'
10.73







9.63





4.5

4,673
4,203
4,205
4,366
4,438
3,910
4,42fi
4,822
7,595
3,359
3,760
3520



7,303
5,855
3,300?
6,320
6,372
5,600
5,678
5,074
5,074













7,138

J-55,23*
304 S.S.,17*
304 SS, 17*
304 S3, 17*
K-55,231
K-55,23*
fT-304L S.S.
N-60,23*
J-55
36*
40*
40*



K-55, 11.64
K-55,23*
J-55, 45*
J-55,2S*
J-55,2S#
N-80, 47*
' M-30,47*
J-55, 46. 34
• J-55, 45. 5*





-

S-30,^0*





K-55

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y



y
y

y
y
y
y
n
n















WY
WYCCN 0-EMIKL CWPWY
                                                     Page 6

-------
ENGINEERING DETAILS-TUBING ftND COMPLETION INFO,CLftSS I HU
                                                                             COMPLETION
Arco Alaska Inc.

Stauffer Chenical Co.


Ethyl Coro.
Great Lakes Che»ical Corp., toin plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., South plant


flerojet Strategic Propulsion Company
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
SfflLL OIL CCWWiY
ILS. CORP. OF ENGINEERS flND CHEMICAL CORP.
fe
Kaiser filuainun i Chemical Co.
Monsanto Coapany


Allied Chen. Co.
Cabot Corp.

LTV Steel Coapany*
Velsicol Corp.

Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Bum Harbor Plant

Seneral Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Para Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Coapany*

Midwest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pignent Co.

Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
Shentin Uilliais
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1


1
3
1
2
i
2
1
1
1
2
2*
1*
2
1
1
IH3
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
IN9
3
2.37
2.37
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.5
2.37
5.3
5.5
5.5
2.88
2.87


4.76
6.0
6
6
2.87
4.5
3.5
4.5
2.38
4.5
4.5
3
4.5

2.88
2
4.5
3.5
2
3.10
4.5

4.5
5.5
1,960

4,407
3,400.8

2,991
2,667
2,4fil
2,540
2,676.84
975
9,757


4,322
1,386
1,390
1,417
3,642
5,000
4,600300
3.091
1,743
2,428
2,565
2,223
2,600

3,332
2,246
2,500
2,583
2,750
2,471
2,640

2,600
1,420
J-55,4.78
J-55,4.7*
K-55
H-40

K-55, 171


K-55, 14*
17*
J-55
N-SO,5.5*



stnless stl
stnless stl
stnles stl
fibercast
fibercast




fiberglass
J-55, 9. 38
K-55, 121

J-55
H-40, 4. 71
fiberglass
fibercast
fibercast

fiberglass

fibercast



perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
Perforated
perforated


n open hole
ocen hole
ooen hole
open hole
ooen hole
open hole
open hole
open hole
perforated
- open hole

Perforated, open hole
perf orated
open hole

open hole, screened

open hole
open hole
open hole
open hole
perforated
open hole
open hole
                          Page 1

-------
Stata
               ENGINEERING KTfllLS-TlJBINS flNO CfflPLETICN INFO,CLflSS I HU




FfiCILITY «9£                HELL NO.  tubing
COMPLETION

Vulcan Materials Co.




E. I. Ouoont De Neaours i Co.

Aaerican Cyanaaid Co.




ftrcadian Corporation*
Atlas Procsssing Co.
BflSF Hyandotte Corooration
Border* Chenical Co.


Browning-Ferris Industries (CECCS)
Chevron Cheaical Co.

Citgo Petroleua Corp.*



E. I. Duoont, Lap lacs




-

Eihyi Corp. of Baton Rouge
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
International Minerals and Cheaical Corp.

Monsanto Chesical Ccapany,Luling plant

NflSfi, Michoud flsseably Facility*

Rollins Environsental Services of Lfl, Inc
Rubicon Cheaical Inc.

2
4
3
7
3
9
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
4
3
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
5.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
7
7
7
7
9. S3
6.63

3.5
7
7
7
3.5
3.5
3.5 -
7.63
7.63


6.53
2.38
2.38
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
2. S3
2.38
4.5
4.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
1,500
3,380
4,124
4,000
3,380
4,020
3,115
3,115
2,046
2,896
2,950
4,570
4,810
4,775

5,275
3,009
3,228

4,439
2,562
5,433
4,390
4,673


4, SCO
5,773
4,390
4,572
4,138
2,372
2,464
9,090
300
3,746
3740
2,422
2,422
4,356
"4,355
4,446
3,302
3,417
steel
Fibercast N
fibercast N
fibercast n
fibercast N
fibercast N
fiberglass n
fiberglass n

J-55
K-55
K-55
k-55
3,1555

FRP, 20001
J-55, 234
K-55, 231
fH-flO,23J
FT,2.4* n
unknown n
unknown n
K-55,2S4
K-55, 26*


254
4.71
4.7*
ISt
111
3.33 n
10. 5»
J-55
J-55 n
304 sen. 4*0
304 SCH 40 n
fiberglass

J-55, 161
J-55, IS*
10 4 11 *s
K-55, 12111 «
K-55, 12*
open hole
open hole
open hole
open hole
ocen hole
open hole
open hole
open hole
perforated
perforated
oerf orated
perforated
perforated
screened
oerf orated
Derf orated
screened
perforated
screened
perforated
ooen hole
perforated"
perforated
perforated


serf orated

wr for at sd
screened
perforated
perforated
oerforated
perforated
screened
screened

screened
screened
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
                                                             Page 2

-------
FflCILITY WtE
ENGINEERING DETfllLS-TUBINS flND COMPLETION INFQ,CLflSS I HH




               WELL NO. tubing
COMPLETION

Shell Chenical Coapany

Shell Oil Coapany, East site






Shell Oil Company, Uest site




Stauffer Cheaical Company


TENNECO OIL COHPflNY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Hitco Chesical Corooration,6retna
Uitco Chenical Corporation, Hahnvi lie

Uyandotte Chwical Corporation
BflSF Wyandotte


Detroit Coke Coapany


DOM Chen. Co.


3
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3
4
5
4
Z
1
6
Z
3
1
7
6
5
1
1
Z
D-2
1
Z
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
7
4.5
1.25
5.5
7
7
7
7
7
5
4.5
5.5
5
5.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5

5.5
5.5
7
5.5
4.5
7
7
7
7
7

5.56
8.63
4.5
4.5
4.5


3.5
3.5
2.5
4
4
5.5
3.5
3.5
5,199
4,124
2,316
1,729
1,962
1,905
2,686
2,691
2,593
1,952
2,570
1,548
1,531
1,667
2,561
3,628.64
4,018
4,454

2,600
2,620
3,194-
3,582
3,450
3,671
3,173
3,600
4,521
2,964

980
988
6,765
1,438
2,235


4,873
4,860
3,525

3,702
3,665


K-55, 25*
fiberglass
N-80, 2*
N-80, 20*0
J-55, 23*
J-55, 23*
K-55, 23*
K-55, 23*
K-55,26J25#
N-80, 18*
3* fbergls
18*, PI 10
23*, N-80
K-55, 12J16*
fibgls,3*
K-55, 11*
K-55, 11*
K-55, 10. 5*


J-55
K-55, 26*
K-55, 17*
N-60, 13*
K-55, 26*
J-55
26*
J-55, 26*
K-55, 26*

fl-53,27*

23 4 26*
J-55, 11. 6*
N-80, 13. 5


FRP
FRP
J-55, 6. 5*
J-55, 12*
J-55
J-55, 15. 5*
J-55, 9. 3*
J-55, 9. 3*
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
perforated
n perforated
n perforated
n perforated
perforated
perforated
n perforated
n perforated
y pef orated
n perforated
n perforated
perforated
perforated
n

perforated
screened
n perforated
perforated
N perforated
perforated
n perforated
screened
screened
perforated
-
perforated-
perforated
perforated
y perforated
perforated


open hole
open hole
open hole
perforated
ooen hole, perforated
open hole
open hole
open hole
                                         Page 3

-------
State
               ENBINEEHIN6 OETBILS-TUBINS ftND COMPLETION INFO, CLASS I




FftCILITY Wt*                 WELL  NO.  tubing
                      CQ1PLETIDN













MS
NC



CH














CK








E. I. Duoont, Mont ague
Ford Motor Co., Rouge Steel

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Parfce Davis i Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleia Inc.*

Velsiral Chea. Corp.
Filtrol Corp.
HEHCCFINfl


.
flnsco Steel Corp.

Calhio Chemical Inc.*

Cheaical Waste tenagesent, Inc.





Sohio Cheaical Coaoany, Vistron


United States Steel Corporation

flgrico Chen. co.
flaerican flirlires Inc.

Cheaical Resources Inc.
Kaiser

Rockwell International
SCKX
a
i
D-l
D-2
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
QB 5
IS
17 A
QB 4
1
2
1
2
S
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
5.5
3.5
2
2.37
2.75
2.38

3.5
3.5

3.5
4.5
5.5
4.5





3.5
2.37
3.5
3.5
3.5
2.75
2.75
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
3.5
6.63
5.5
5,5
3,5
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.5

5,541
563


1,584

4,834



3,331

5,670





2,315
5,900

2,765
2,800
2,730
2,308

2,808

2,803
2,aoo
5,513
5,547
1,478

1,752
2,071


i,ais
-1746


4.71
4.6*
TX-75
EVE
J-55
J-55,3.3*
J-55,3.31

H-40
K-55, 10. 5t
K-55, 17*
fibercast





fibercast
fiber., 71
K-75,9.3*
fiberglass
fiberglass
fiserglass
fiberglass
fiberglass
fiberglass

y/ 7K-90, 12*

N-80,9.3»
J-55,9.3*
fibercast
K-55
K-55, 141
stnls.stl.
CW55, 10.5$
J-55,9.5i
K-55, 12*
fiberglass
open hole
open hole
ooen hole
perforated
ooen hole

ooen hole
open hole
open hole

open hole
open hole
ooen hole
perforated




y open hole
open hole
ooen hole, perforated
open hole, oerf orated
open hole
ooen hole
ooen hole
open hole
open nole
•y open hole
ooen hole
open hole
ocen hole
y perforated
y perforated
n ocen hole
open hole
open hole
ooen hole
n open hole
n ocen hole
n open hole
ooen hols
Pfl    Haa«emill Paper Co.
                                                         1,601
fiberglass   y open hois?
                                                              Page 4

-------
               ENGINEERING DETfllLS-TUBING fiND COMPLETION INFO, CUBS I HU




FBCILITY'NBHE                 HELL NO.  tubing
COMPLETION


flwxo Oil Co.




ftrco Chen. CO., Lyondale plant


Badische Corp. (Dow Badische Co.)

Browning - Ferris Industries
Celanese Cheaical Co.



Celanese Chemical Co. , Clear Lake plant

Chaaiolin, Soltex t ICI, Corpus Christi

Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFD*
Cheaical Uaste Nanageaent
CHEMICflL HflSTE «fiNfl6E2€NT, INC

Coninco ftnerican Inc.
Disposal Systems, Inc.
E. I. Dupont, Beauiwunt

E. I. Dupont, Houston plant


E. I. Dupont, Ing leside


E. I. Dupont, Sabine River wrks







E. I. Dupont, Victoria

2
1
5
4
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
Petro 2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
8
7
6
flDN3
5
4
2
3
5
4.5
7
7
5.5
4.5
5.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.5
6.83
5.5
5.5
4.5
4,5
3.5
3.5
2.6
2.375
2.87
7
7
4.5
4.5
7
4.5
4.5
3.5
6.63
5.5
4.5
2.88
5.5
3.5
5.5
4.5
4.5
1,600
1,650
5,814
5,970
5,372
6,295
5,345
6,308
6,820
6,043
3,323
4,650
3,200
3,200
5,201
2,579-5,200
7,168
7,130
4,805
4,585
6,745
4,180
4,078

4,820
5,137
4,982
5,197
4,020

5,339
4,048
4,498
4,278

4,467
3,800
3,251
fiberglass
fiberglass
K-55,26*
K-55,261
J-55, 1551

K-55,15.5#
K-55,40i
11.61


fiberglass
J-55

fiberglass
fiberglass
TFP,3.~75*
Carbon-steel
unknown
fiberglass
fiberglass
K-55,26*
K-55
fiberglass
fiberglass
fiberglass
fibercast

Steel
316ss, 17*
31S-L,sst
sch. 40
K-55, 6. 5*
3, 16ss. 17*
9.21
316ss, 17*
K-55, 121
K-55, 12*
y selectojetted?
y perforated
n open hole
n screen and crave 1 pack
n perforated
perforated
n perforated
n cerforated
y open hole
y perforated
screened
screened
perforated
screened
y screened with gravel pack
n screened and gravel pack
n screened
n perforated
n oerforated
perforated
perforated 82/04/00
screened
- screened
screened
screened
screened
n screened
screened
n screened -
screened
screened
screened
oerf orated
n screened
n screened
n screened
n perforated
n perforated
                                        Page 5

-------
Ststa
              ENGINEERING DETfllLS-TUBING WD OHPLETION INFO, CUBS I HW




FfiCILITY  NBE                WELL NO.  tubing
COMPLETION








Eaoak, Inc.
General flmline and Fil« Corp.


Silbraltar Wastewaters, Inc.
Nalone Servica Co.

ferichea co.
Sonsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou



Monsanto Co.

Phillios Cheaical Co.

Potash Co. of fiserica Division
Shell Cheiical Co.

SCNICS INTERNfiTIOm.

Velsicol Chesical Co.


Vistron Corporation


Waste-water Inc.
Witco Cheaical Co., Houston

Witco Cheaical Co. , Marshal 1

A
5
&
7
8
9
10
I
1
1
2
3
1
1
a
i
4*
3
1
a
i
a
D-2
D-3
1
1
a
i
2
2
1
3
1
a -
3
I
2
1
3
2
4.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
6.63
4.5

4.5
4.5
4.5

3.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
7. S3
5
5.5
7
7
7
7
3.5
3.5
4.5



4.5
4.5
5.5
5.5
5.5

4.5
2.33
2.38
a. 33
3,064
3,020
3,005
3,020
3,730
3,877
4,180
3,170

3,351/3,3*'
-.160
3,5*€

4,872

6,491
5,385
5, SSI
3,500
3,988
6,Sfl2
6,525
3,305
3,745 -
1,131
5,300
5,755



3,941
4,609
5,100
7,250
5,717


7,134
5,550

K-55, 121
304 S.S.,19*
304 S. S, 13*
304 SS,9*
K-55, 12*
K-55, 12*
304 S.S.,404
K-55, 12*

4-55

K-55

J-55, 101
K-55, lit

Zircomuia

J-55, 15*
N-30, 17*
N-30 4 K-55 .
fiberglass
J-55, is*
J-55. 23*
fifaercast
olastic coat
plastic coat



£VE
EVE





J-5S


n perforated
n perforated
n perf orated
n aerf orated
n perf crated
n screened
n perforated
n oerfcrated
n perforated
screeened
screened
screened
perforated
perforated

n perforated
screened
perforated
perforated
screened
n screened
n screened.
perforated
oerfora"ad
y
perforated
perforated


-
serf orated
oerfora';ea
aerf orated
screened
Mr f orated
screened
perforated
oerf orated
oerf orated
perforated
      WYCCN C-^ICPL
                                                            Page 6

-------
tats
                •FflCILl~Y NP«c
ENGINEERING DETAILS-PRESSURE WO, CLASS I HW




                 WELL MJ.    Min     flvg        Max
Actual    Design    Pernit
Arco Alaska Inc.

Stauffer Chesical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Chesical Corp., Main plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., South plant


Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Coaoany
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
SHELL OIL COMPANY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS AND OEMICftL CORP.
Kaiser Aluainun t Chesical Co.
Monsanto Coapany


Allied Chen. Co.
Cabot Cora.

LTV Steel Cospany*
Velsicol Corp.

Bethlehes Steel Cor por at ion, Burn Harbor Plant

General Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Fans Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Goapany*

Midwest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigsent Co.

Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
2*
1*
3
j
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1


1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2*
1*
2
1
1
INS
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
INS
700
700

215
250
100 375
100 150



30 16.3
2000


65 145
135 140
135 140
135 140
-20 0
4 17

0 0


338
0 51


300
100 200
143
58


250
400 800
MA NA
1,400
1400



700
700



1.6
3,500


185
175
175
175
80
30

100



65



350
791
270
30


1,200
Nfl





375
125



29* 300* 55




200
200
200
0 485 100


41* 340

-





200 none? none?


53 Nfl 600*



0 0 none
Shentin Uilliaas
                                                   Page 1

-------
Stat-?
rflCILJTY
ENGINEERING DeifllLS-PRESSURE  I>FQ,ClflSS I  HW

                 HELL NO.     Bin      flvg        Max
         L  I.  Dupont, Laplace
         Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
         Georgia-Pacific Corporation
         International Minerals and Cheaical  Cora.

         Monsanto Cheaical Coscany,Lulinq plant

         NftSfl, Hicfioud flsseably Facility*

         Rollins Environsental Services of IP, Inc
         i?ufaicon Chesicai Inc.
                                          flctual    Design

Vulcan Materials Co.




E. I. Dupont De Newurs I Co.

foerican Cyanaiid Co.



Orcadian Corporation*
fit las Processing Co.
BflSF Wyandotte Corporation
Borden Cheaical Co.


Browning-Ferris Industries (CZCQS)
Chevron Cheaical Co.

Citgo Petroleu* Corp.*

2
4
3
7
3
9
1
2
1
2
3
5
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
I
2
3
1
2

-20
-20
-30
-35
-25
14.7
14.7






-5.3
300
300
300
1050
Nfl
Nfl



0
-5
-12
-25
-10
17.2
17.2






-5.3
500
500
500
1200
560
660
570
665'

100' Hg
0
0' Hg
0
10
19.7 psia
19.7






2.9
700
700
700
1350
770
330
900
900

-3.7
-2.5
-5.1
-13. S
-6.1
17.2
17.2




Nfl

-5.3



vary
560
560
570
665

0
0
0
0
0
2,000
2,000




250





1200
Nfl
Nfl



0
0
0
0
0
85
35




Nfl





1500
NA '
Nfl


4
3
7
&
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
                                              (100     200
                                              520
420
(100
1000
50
70
20
80
-15
90
90






300
300
£50
ISO
-10
110
110
352
307
1430
1*30
335
400
£00
600
460
450
-5
240
240






1S5
59
207
144
-10
90
110






(100 1080
(100 1000
(100 430
(100 460
-10 none








                                                             Page 2

-------
tate
                ENGIfCERINS DETBILS-PRESSURE IfFQ,ClfiSS I W




FflCILITY NR)€                    WELL NO.    Min     ftvg
flctual    Design    Pernit

Shell Cheaical Ccapany

Shell Oil Company, East site






Shell Oil Coapany, West site




Stauffer Cheaical Ccapany


TENNEO3 OIL COHPflNY


Texaco Inc.




Dmroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Uitco Cheaical Corporation,Sretna
Witco Cheaical Corporation,Hahnville

Hyandotte Cheaical Corporation
I BflSF Wyandotte


Detroit Coke Ccapany


DOM Chen. Co.


3
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1
7
6
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4

085

200
200
100
110
160
110

0
50
60
50
0
0
100
0

200
200

380

217







50
100
300










335
208











280

150
250
100

192
263

453

238
101
480
420
216

230
670
466
250
600




800






230

460
470
500
500
460
440

220
280
225

220
375
400
200

350
325

540

260








400



1,200
1,200







180


200
175
150
250
275

0
60
59
70
60
100
300
250

192
198
0
453
0
0
0
450
450
300
-


466
250
350









.

0













600
600
600

375
375
650
650
650
650
650






700
1,500
1,500



























400








779
1043
630



1000
N
N


Nfl
Nfl






                                                           Page 3

-------
ENGINEERING OETRILS-PRESSURE INFQ,CLftSS I HW
State













«S
NC



OH














OK







FflCILITY NffC

E. I. Dupont,Montaaue
Ford fetor Co., Rouge Steel

Koskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis i Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleua Inc.*

Velsicol Ches. Corn.
Filtrol Coro.
HESOJFlNfl



flrseo Steel Corp.

Cilhio Chwical Inc.*

Chexical Waste tanaoesent, Inc.





Schio Che»ical Ccaoany, Vistron


United States Steel Corooration

flgrico Chea. co.
ftoerican flirlines Inc.

Cheaical Resources Inc.
Kaiser

fockxell International
Soaex
HELL NO.
a
i
D-l
D-a
i
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
OB 5
IS
17 fl
08 4
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
1
2
i
1
i
2
1
1
Min











300
60









0
0
0
0
0
0



1424
14flO
100

345
0
90
0
0

flvg

0
134




439
520


SCO
65
.220






1400


0
700
700

700



146S
1557
280

400
408
2CO
200
245

Max





700





700
70





30
30



0
83/06/00
790

790



1517
1595
320

490
315
250
205
275

Actual Design Persii











30fl *


150
150+ 150 150
150+ 150
150





790
700 1000 790
700 1000 750
790
760 790 790



1450 1702
1,640 1,702
2BO 375 320

SCO

250 400 250
240 400 -250
245 270 275

Pfl
Hasaenill Paoer Co.
                                                         Page 4

-------
State
TY1 WK:
ENGINEERING DETfllLS-PRESSURE INFO,CLASS I HU

                 WELL hfl.    ton     flvg        Wax
         flraoco  Oil  Co.
         flrco  Chw.  CO.,  Lyondale plant
         Badische Corp. (Dow Badische Co.)

         Browning - Ferris Industries
         Celanese Chesncal Co.
         Celanese  Chemical  Co. , Clear  Lake plant

         Chanplin,  Soltex   t  ICI,  Corous  Christi  Petro

         Chaparral  Disposal Co. (BFD*
         Cheaical  Waste  Management
         CHEMICflL  WflSTt  flfiNflGEJ-ENT, INC

         Coainco ftaerican  Inc.
         Disposal  Systems,  Inc.
         E.  I. Dupont,Beauaount

         E.  I. Dupont, Houston plant


         E.  I. Duoont, Ingleside


         £.  I. Dupont, Sabine  River  works
fictual    Design    Permit
                                                                              121
        E. I. Dupont, Victoria
5
'4
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
3
7
6
ADN3
5
4
2
3


777
372


0 321
0 233

539

303
180
201
340
636

0 40
0 40
300 1403
265



WC 92.3
0 800
0 750


556







941
553
857
535
0 500
0 500





1,500
700
390









415
415
1417

400


1300
1500
1500
2000



2,000
850




970
918
1,410
847
1000
1000


600*
600*
650*

170
150

500







0
0
1417




100
635
657



-14.1

-46.5








835
815


2500
2500
2500

1000
1000
1050
1050







1500
1500
£210




1500
1500
1500














1000
1000


1000
1000
1000

1000
1000
1050
1050





1000
1000
1500
1500
2210




1300
1500
1500



850

350
1,200
950
350

1500
1500
1,500
1500
1000
1000
                                                            Page 5

-------
State
                               ENGINEERING DeTfllLS-PRESSURE INFO,CLflSS I HU




                FfiCILITY NtfS                    'JELL NO.    Min     ftvg        flax
flctual    Design    Perait








Eapak, Inc.
General flniline and Fill Corp.


Silbraltar Hastewaters, Inc.
Salone Semes Co.

Wericheji co.
Monsanto Chwical Co., Chocolate Bayou



Monsanto Co.

Phillips denical Co.

Potash Co. of flaerica Division
Siell Cheaical Co.

SGNICS IKTERNflTIGNfiL

Velsicol Cfieiical Co.


Vistron Corporation


Uaste-water Inc.
Uitco Chesical Co. , Houston

Witco Chesical Co., Marshall
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-a
0-3
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
600
600
600








0
0

0
VfiC
0
0












500
500
500
500
300
500

500
1000
850
850
350
300
1241
1074
254

800

600
746
470
14,3
0
VfiC
53.3
2023



250


560
860

12S8
1400
570
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000

1000

1500
1500
1500








1,023


10
Vacuum
ISO
200


950

950

-





330
330
470
640
0
845
730
775
900
757

913



400




746
710
0
0
we

0


-









1000
1COO
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1500
1500

1500



950




2,000
1,500
600
600 -
250














1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1500
::00

1500

1500

950




1,500
1,500
600
600
250
1000
1600












                                                                                     1,000
HY
WCON DOICfil
                                                            Page 6

-------
ate
ENGINEERING
FBCILITY'NfiHE
flrco fllaska Inc.

Stauffer Chesical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Chemical Corp., Hain plant
Great Lakes. Cheaical Corp., South plant


fterojet Strategic Propulsion Coapany
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
SHELL OIL CCMPfiNY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS flND OOICflL CORP.
Kaiser flluainua 4 Cheaical Co.
Monsanto Coapany


Allied Chen. Co.
Cabot Corp.

LTV Steel Coapany*
Velsicol Corp.

DETfllLS-RflTE
HELL NO.
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1


1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
Bethlehea Steel Cor por at ion, Burn Harbor Plant 2*

General Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Indiana rarn Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Cospany*

Midwest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigment Co.

Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
1*
2
1
1
IN3
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
IN9
OF INJECTION, CLftSSI
SPM
84
84
70
70'
70
16
100
469
474

34.6
153


300
1,200
1,200
1,200
83
225
200
260
200
100
131
6
60
28.5
21
7
230
211
75
500
500
80
300
Min
0
0



25
50



0



149
1100
1100
1100
65
170

50







2


0


50
0
HW
fivg
84
84



30
100



34.6
153


300
1250
1250
1250
83
225

175


131 -




7


53
500
500
80
184

Max Actual
336
336



100.35 28
150 75



50 35
245


387
1400
1,400
1,400
100 60
280

260 2SO

"•





15.3 5.5
300
250 211
75 62


110
300

Des:










70







200

200








now

300
Nfl



300
                                                                                                                         35
                                                                                                                          1200*
                                                                                                                          1200*
                                                                                                                          1200*

                                                                                                                          150
                                                                                                                         260
                                                                                                                none?    none?
                                                                                                                         75
      Sherttin Uilliaats
10.5
10.5
                                                            Page 1

-------
State
                ENGINEERING DETfllLS-fiflTE OF INJECTION, CLfiSSI  KM




fflCILITY MVE                   WELL  NO.       3PN       Min    ftvg     Max
KY
Lfl
fictual   Design   Persil

Vulcan toterials Co.




E.I. Dupont De Nesours i Co.

fiaerican Cyanaaid Co.




Orcadian Corporation*
fit las Processing Co.
BflSF Wyandotte Corporation
Borden Chesical Co.


Browning-Ferns Industries (CECCS)
Qievron Cheaical Co.

Citgo Petroleu* Corp.*


E. I. Dupont, Lap lacs






Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Seorgia-Pacific Corcoration
International Minerals and Cfieaical Corp.

tonsanto Cfiesical Ccaoany,Luhng plant

NflSfl, "ichcud flssesbly Facility*

Rollins Enviromental Services of LA, Inc
Rubicon Chenical Inc.

2
4
3
7
8
9
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
i
D-l
1
2
3
• 1
2
3
1
2
3
1
6
5
4
3
2
t
i
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
10.5
300
350
350
300
350
43
100
300
300
200
250
300
500
20
75
750
750
750
90
145
120
"400
"85

190
on standby
on standby
130
300
90
146
100
0
100
100
38
248
57
57
2E5
106
"170

0
0
0
0
0
25
25







0
300
300
300
30
000
000



20


9
80
44
33
0

0
0




270


10.5
208
300
300
300
350
44.3
95





50

52
750
750
750
90
145
120
346
123

190


130
300
90
146
100

100
ICO
58
243
57
57
2S5
106


350
350
350
350
WO
150
150







144
1,200
1,200
1,200
120
266
220
542
440

540


230
4QO
302
310
150

240
240




450



208
295
325
185
323
44.3
95





NONE

75



vary
145
120
346
123

200
-

230
216
132
146
100

85
0








400
400
400
400
400
150
150





500

250



120
Kfl
Nfl
800.
600

400


400
400
400
400
100

400
400








300
350
350
300
350
150
150





500

150



120
Wfl
Nfl



Nfl

N
Nfl
Nfl
Nfl
Nfl
none










                                                             Page  2

-------
:ate
                ENGINEERING DETfllLS-RflTE OF  INJECTION, ClASSI  HH




FRCILITY Nfi)€                   WELL NO.       SPM       Hin    fivg
ftctual   Design   Penult

Shell Chemical Coapany

Shell Oil Coapany, East site





I
Shell Oil Company, West site




Stauffer Chemical Coopany


TENNECO OIL CONPfiNY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


!»itco Cheaical Corporation, Sretna
Witco Cheiiical Corporation, Hahnvi lie

ityandotte Chetaical Corporation
BflSF Wyandotte


Detroit Coke Ccapany


DOM Chew. Co.


3
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3
A
5
4
I
i
6
2
3
1
7
6
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
260
87.5
50
110
175
200
290
255
280
170
110
60
245
60
200
80
85
85

54
39





452
303
583

148
211
2S£
164
163

150
130
130
50
87
67

40
21.5

60 87.5

105
175
200
290
25S
280
170
110
60
345
60
200
80 85
80 85
80 85

54
39

76 108



452
303
583

148
211
25 262
42 164
42 163




50






115

200











110
110
110

100
122

186










220
220



82
100






87

110
175
200
290
280
255
170
110
60
345
60
200
75
90
80

54
39
0
108
0
0
0
500
350
850
-


262
200
200


100
100







84

350
400
400
450
600
530
300
400
210
360
195
400
110
110
600

360
360
300
300
200
200
300






300
220
220

160
300
300























400








Nfl
N3
Nfl



400
N
M


Nft
Nfl






                                                            Page 3

-------
                                         ENGINEE3INS DETfllLS-RflTE OF INJECTION, CLASSI HU
Cv «•>•-
                        FflCILITY
WELL NO.
Hin    flvg     flax      Actual   Design   Pew

E.I. Duoont,Montaque
Ford Jtetor Co. , Rouge Steel

Heskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis t Co.



The Upjohn Co,
Total Petroleua Inc. *

Velsicol Ches. Corp.
IS Filtrol Ccro.
NC KESCCFINfl



OH flrsco Steal Corp.

Calhio Cheaical Inc.*

Chemical Wasts Management, Inc.





Sohio Cheaical Coaoany, Vistrcn


United States Steel Corporation

CK flgrico Chea. co.
&«rican flirlines Inc.

Cheaical Resources Inc.
Xaiser

Rockwell International
Sosex
8
1
0-1
D-2
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
08 5
16
17 fl
G8 4
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
20
87
18.7
15.2
10. S


45
45

0
0
156
250
208
2oa
206

43
•36,4
5S
50


49
40
56
40
400
400
400
31.6
81.6
600

450
75
305
350
160
variable


18.7




45
45

0 50
59

250






%


0 0
0 46
0 42
0
0 40



3 40
21 71
240 iSO

150 360
45 75
0 98
0 200
0 ISO











100
59





208
43
36.4



0
49 48
45 *2

48 - 33



86.5 38 -
S3 32
650 480

450
SO
150 98
240 243
300











100
100 *










100
120
100
100 NA
100 Nft
60
400
400
400
67 NA
Nfl
700 vary



250 250
3CO 350


        Hanmeraill Pacer  Co.
                                                               Page 4

-------
                                      EN6INEERIN6 DETfllLS-RflTE  OF INJECTION, CLflSSI  HH

ate                   FflCILITY NflWE                   WELL  NO.       6PM       Kin    Pvg     tax     flctual   Design   Penult
      flnoco Oil Co.
      ftrco Chea. CO., Lyondale plant
      Sadische Corp. (Dot* Badische Co.)

      Browning - Ferris Industries
      Celanese Chemical Co.
      Celanese Chemical Co.,Clear Lake plant

      Champ! in, Soltex  t  ICI, Corpus Christi  Petro

      Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFD*
      Chesucal Iteste Management
      CHEMICfiL «flSTE MflNflGSMENT, INC

      Coainco fiaerican Inc.
      Disposal Systeas, Inc.
      E.  I.  Dupont,Beausount

      E.  I.  Dupont, Houston plant


      £.  I.  Dupont, Ingleside


      E.  I.  Dupont,Sabine River works
      E.  I.  Dupont,Victoria
                                                       2           189                 189
                                                       1           1,150
5
4
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
4
i
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
8
7
6
ADN3
5
4
2
3


210
12
180
400
69
146
350
57.9

101
750
750
105
286

65
54
59
103
200


31.3
450
445
260
60
%
150
350
150




9.8
438
79
475
135
100


0
0
0

0
0









1
1
0




0
0
0










0

0

0
0


147
105

400
69
146

57.9

101
750
750
105
286


64
59
103



31.3
425
450
260
60
%







8.5
438
795
475
500
100


1200
500
800

212
2S8









200
200
57

200


260
600
500




350
150




23
700
205
683
500
500


400*
250*
325*

72
156

150







100
100
59




40
520
- 328



23.9

10.3








135
95


750
750
550

350
350
350
350







200
200
67




300
600
600














500
500


2000
2000
2000

350
350
350
350





400
400
200
200
180

200'


250
600
600



150

150

550
550





500
500
                                                           Page 5

-------
State
                ENGINEE31N8 DETfllLS-fiflTE OF INJECTION, CU5SSI HU




FACILITY ,l&r£                   WELL MJ.       SPM       Hin    ftvg     fox
fietual   Design   Perai








Effloak, Inc.
General flmline arxl Fila Corp.


Silbraltar Uastewaters, Inc.
'telcne Service Co.

tenches co.
fonsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Sayou



fonsanto Co.

Phillips Chenical Co.

Potash Co. of ftrerica Division
Shell Cheaical Co.

SWICS INTESNRTIGNftl

Velsicol Cheaical Co,


Vistron Corporation


»aste-*ater Inc.
Mitco Cheaical Co. , Houston

'Jitco Cheaical Co. , Marshall

4
5
5
7
8
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
D-3
1
1
2
1
a
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
2
100
225
£25
225
ICO


97
150

225
160
82
114
153
155
300
850
1,033
30
425
330
0
130

53.4
108



"170
100
50
138
1S2
100
140
-12
££.3
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
30
80



£0




0


0
0
0
0










0


100
225
225
225
100
125
240
100
150
135
135
135
82
114
158
155

850

90
425
330
0
76
.29
53.4
108


100
170
100
_ 50
133
152

140
12
£6.S
11
500
500
SCO
500
500
500
500
500

225
225
225



230




1,150


200
37.9
150
250












30
140
275
260
349
100
107
350
97
136
134

213



150




638



37.9
53.4
108


-










500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
300
450

450
200


300
300
350
585
1,020
1,000
1000
1,500
1,500
100
200*







-






500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
300
225

225

150

300




600*
600*
1,500

30

200*













            N CHEMICAL
                                                             Page 6

-------
                                 ENGINEERING DETfllLS-PflCKER  t  RNNULUS II^O,CLflSS I HU
State
flK

AL


OR




Cfl

FflCILITY m£
ftrco fllaska Ire.

Stauffer Chesical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., Main plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corn., South plant


flerojet Strategic Propulsion Ccupany
Rio Bravo Disoosal Facility
HELL NO.
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1
PKR
y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
DEPTH
1,960
1,960
4,407
32
4,464
3,013
2,668.4
2,340
2,498.3
2,676.84
976
9,757
finnulus fluid
Slycol 4 Hater
Blycol J water



inhibited brine
inhibited brine



2*KCl+Sodiua bicarbonat
Nitrogen gas
CO        SHELL OIL COJIPflNY
          U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS flND DOICflL CORP.

FL        Kaiser flluainua J Cheaicai Co.
          tonsanto Conpany
IL        flllied Chen. Co.
          Cabot Corp.

          LTV Steel Company*
          Velsicoi Corp.
IN        Bethlehea Steel Corporation,Burn Harbor  Plant

          General Electric

          Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
          Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative
          Inland Steel Coupany*

          Midwest Steel
          Pfizer Mineral and Pigment Co.

          Uniroyal Inc. *
          United States Steel Corooration

KS        Shemn Williams
1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2*
1*
2
1
1
IN3
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
IN9
3
y
y
y
y
n
y
n
n
n
n
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
n
n

y
y
3,916
1,360
1,370
1,395

4,551




2,508
2,185*
2,600

3,366
2,248.65
2,500
2,270
2,078



2,360
1,420
water
cnroraate brine
Chroaate brine
Chromate brine



water

-
lake water
water



solution
solution
solution










inhibited annulus fluid
water
12 diesel
Biocide treated
water
12 diesel oil
#2 diesel oil

city water



water*






                                                         Page  1

-------
State
KY
      EN6INEEHIN6 DETWLS-WCKER t fiNNULUS INFO, CUSS I  HU




FflCILITY NPE                    UcLL NO.     PKR       DEPTH
ftnnulus  fluid

Vulcan Materials Co.




LI. Duoont De Neaours 4 Co.

Rserican Cyanaaid Co.




flrcadian Corporation*
fit las Processing Co.
BflSF wyandotte Corporation
Borden Qieaical Co.


Browning-Ferris Industries (CECCS)
Chevron Cheaical Co.

Citgo Petroleu* Corp. *



L I. Dupont, Laplace






Ethyl. Corp. of Baton Rouge
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
International Minerals and Chesical Corp.

fonsanto CJieaical CcBoany, tilling plan:

NASfl, Nidicud flssa«biy Facility*

Rollins Environmental Services of Lfl,Inc
Rubicon Cfiesical Inc.

2
4
3
7
3
9
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
0-1
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
4
3
7
&
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2

n
n
n
n
n
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
n
y
n
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y


y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
*1,500





3,065
3,065
2,0465
2,3%
2,950
2,337
2,222

90S

3,000
2,900
3,123
4,-340
2,S65
5,435
4,380
4,536


4,551
5,753
4,890
4,571
4,123
2,373
2,458
3,925
3,254
3,741
3,729
2,4<2
2,422
4,356
4,85a
4,446
3,302
3,422






CaC12 brine
CaC12 Brine





none

oil



inhibited b
water
water



















rine


inmaited aater
inmoited water


brine
brine
Brine

brine
brine
brine
brine
water

water witn
















inn i bit or




inhibited srine
brine



                                                     Page 2

-------
State
       ENGINEERING DETfllLS-PflCXER i  flNMJLUS  INFO, CUSS  I HW

FfiCILITY-Nftffi                     HELL NO.      PKfi       DEPTH
          SflSF  Wyandotte
         Detroit Coke Coapany
         DOM Chen. Co.
                           flnnulus fluid

Shell Chemical Coapany

Shell Oil Coapany, East site






Shell Oil Company, west site




Stauffer Cheaical Coapany


TENNECQ OIL COMPANY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Witco Cheaical Corporation, Sretna
Witco Cheaical Corporation, Hahnvi lie

Uyandotte Cheaical Corporation
3
4
5
4
5
6
7
B
9
•2
a
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1
7
6
5
1
1
2
D-2
y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y

5,209

2,243
1,729
1,962
2,787
2,686
2,691
2,533

2,570
1,548
1,531
1,667
2,513
3,632.19
4,200
• 4,222

2,600
2,694
3,205
3,582
3,450
3,671
3,173
3,524
4,509
2,959
*6,380
980
989
6,765
1,433


brine


inhibited brine
inmbited brine
inhibited water
inhibited water
inhibited water
inhibited water

water
inhibited brine
inhibited brine
innibited brine
water
water
water
brine/ water

Brine
Brine
water
water


water
Baroid cote B 1,400
Baroid cote B 1400
flFC packer fluid 7790
-

fuel oil

water/Xlr-54
water/kw-54

                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  5
                                  2
                                  4
y
n
y

y
y
y
y
4,715

3,526

3,702
3,660
3,682
4,865
oil
oil

Fuel oil
Fuel oil
                                                       Page 3

-------
Stats
FflCILITY !«*£
                                  DCTfllLS-PflCXES t flNNULUS INFO, CLASS  I  HW




                                                 WELL NO.      PKR       DEPTH
ftrmulus fluid

E. I. Dupont,.1cntacue
Ford ftotor Co., Rouge Steel

•foskins Manufacturing Co.
Parks Davis i Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleua Inc.*

Velsicol Che*. Ccro.
«S Filtrol Corp.
NC HERCCFINfl


*
OH Ansco Steel Corp.

Calfuo Chemcal Inc.*

Dieaical Waste tenageasnt, Inc.





Sohio Cheaical Ccaoany, Vistrcn


United States Steel Corporation

OX Agrico Chea. co.
fifflerican flirhnes Ire.

Cheaical Resource Inc.
Kaiser

Rockwell Intarr^tionai
Soaex
a
i
D-l
o-a
i
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
OB 5
16
17 fl
GB ^
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
5
1ft
1
2
3
1
2*
1
2
i
1
1
2
i
*
y
n
y
y
y
Y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
YES
YES
YES
YES
y
y
y
y
*
V
J
n
n
y
n
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
4,822

454
3,834
2,588 -rssfi Watsr
1,584
1,430
4,973
4,383
1,254.3
1,025 inhibited wter
3,272 inhibited water
3,367

30
823
120
30
2,850

4,745
5,450

a, 785 Diesel
* Diesel
* Diesel
2,750 Diesel
* Dresel
2,783
2,7S9

5,422 corrosion inhibited r£0
5,^27 corrosion imioited H2Q
1,451 inhibited *atsr
1,760
1,750
2,046 crude oil
331 H20 t sooiuffl bicfiroaate
384
1,782 water
1,743
pfl
Hasaenmll Paoer Co.
                                                       Page 4

-------
State
TX
                       ENGINEER INS DETfllLS-PftCXES  i  ftNNUUJS INFO,CLflSS I HW

                FflCILITY NflWE                      HELL NO.      PKR       DEPTH
ftsoco Oil Co.
          flrco Chesu CO., Lyondale plant
          Badische Corp. (Do* Badische Co.)

          Browning - Ferris Industries
          Celanese Chemical Co.
          Celanese Chemical Co.,Clear Lake  plant

          Champlin, Soltex  t  ICI, Corpus Christi  Petro

          Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFD*
          Chemical Waste Management
          OOICflL WflSTE MflNflGEBENT, INC

          Coainco flaerican  Inc.
          Disposal Systems, Irrc.
          E. I. Dupont,Beausount

          E. I. Dupont,Houston plant


          E. I. Duoont,Ingleside


          £. I. Dupont,Sabine  River works
                                                                          y
                                                                          none
                                                                         1,600
ftnnulus fluid
          E.  I. Dupont,Victoria
5
4
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
a
7
6
flDN3
5
4
2
3


y
y
y
y
• y
y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
YES


y
y
y
y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
y


5,801
6,590
6,372
6,256
6,340
6,304
6,675
6,100

3,323
4,650
3,20S
3,195 •
5,201
5,200
7,128
7,130
4,784
4,585
6703


6,750
4,180
4,078
4,824
4,810
5,130

3,932
4,020

5,360
4,048

4,497
4,271
4,448
4,467
3, SCO
3,251


inhibited brine
inhibited brine
inhibited brine

inhibited brien
inhibited brine
brine
brine





brine, corros. inhibitor
brine, corros. inhibitor
brine*
brine*
inhibited brine




inhibited brine
10# brine
ie* brine



water

inhibited brine
*4% sodiua nitrite
8.7*/g sodiua nitrite
4* sodiua nitrite

3f/g sodiuu chloride
"4S sodiua nitrite
^4* sodiua nitrite
V4> sodiua nitrite
brine
brine
                                                         Page 5

-------
State
       ENGINEERING DETfllLS-PflCXES I flNNULUS HFO,CLflSS I  HU




FflCILITY NflJ»SD M. corrosion inmb*
H2Q *. corrosion irsni*


          WYCCN DS1IC.AL
                                                        Page 6

-------
                             SECTION 3
Data on
   "The hydrogeoloqical characteristics of the overlyinq and under-
   lying strata, as well as that into which the waste is injected;"

-------

-------
                                      INJECTION ZW€ CHflRflCTERISTICS OF CLflSS I HH WELLS
State
fiK

fit


flR




Cfl

FfiCILITY N#E
flrco Alaska Inc.

Stauffer Chemical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., Main plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., South plant


«
Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Company
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
HELL NO.
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1
LITHOLOGY
sh,slt,ss
55, Sh,Slt
ss, clay, sari
55,cl,«arls
ss, clay, aar 1
ss, sh, clay
ss
ss
ss
ss
SS,Silt
SS
Thknss
115

70
75
70
85
55 -
198
100
"100
700
801
Naae
Tertiary Sagavanirktok
Tertiary Sagavanirktok
Naheola
Nanafaha
Naheola
Tokio
Tokio, Blossoa, Graves
Graves, Meakins
Graves sand
Graves sand
ferine sediments
Rio Bravo
CO        SHELL OIL CWflNY
          U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS flND  CHENICflL  CORP.

FL        Kaiser flluminua  i Chemical Co.
          Monsanto Coapany
IL        flllied DIM. Co.
          Cabot Corp.

          LTV Steel Coapany*
          Velsicol Corp.
IN        Bethlehea Steel Corporat ion, Burn Harbor Plant

          General Electric

          Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
          Indiana Fara Bureau Cooperative
          Inland Steel Coapany*

          Midwest Steel
          Pfizer Mineral, and Pigsent Co.

          Uniroyal Inc.  *
          United States Steel Corporation

KS        Sherwin Hilliaas
1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2*
1*
2
1
1
INS
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
IN9
Is
Is
Is
Is
5s,dol.
dol.

ss
dol.
Is
ss
SS
ss
ss
ss
55
SS
ss
ss
55
SS
SS
ss
976
359
359
359
308
3%
413
1,760
215
351
1,755
2,069
74
46
800
62
1,410
It759
1800
2,338
3,969
710
1,665
Cedar Keys,Lai«on
Lower Floridan
Lower Floridan
Lower Floridan
Potosi
PotosijEainence
Eminence, Potosi
Mt. Sison
- Sales

Mt. Siaon
£au Claire, ?tt. Simon
Bethel, Cypress
Bethel
Mt. Simon
Tar Springs
Mt. Sinon
ft. Siaon
Mt. Siaon
Mt. Siston
Mt. Siflion
W. Siaon
Mt. Simon
dol, Is, chert     1,004
flrfauckle group
                                                           Page 1

-------
State
           INJECTION Z0f€ CWRflCTERISTICS  OF OfiSS I HH UELLS




FfiCILITY WWE                    WELL NO.      LITHaOSY      Thknss
KY

Vulcan Materials Co.




E. I. Oupont De Nevours 4 Co.

American Cyanasid Co.




ftrcadian Corporation*
fit las Processing Co.
SfiSr Uyandotte Corporation
Borden Cheaical Co.


Browning-ferns Industries (CECGS)
Chevron Cheaical Co.

Citgo Petroleua Corp.*


E. I. DuDcnt,Laolacs






Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
International Minerals and Cheaical Corp.

Jfonsanto Cheaical Ccapany, Luling plant

NflSfl, Michoud flssesbly Facility*

Rollins Environaental Services of Lfl, Inc
Rubicon Cheaical Inc.

a
4
3
7
3
9
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
a
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
dol, Is, chert -
dol.
dol.
dol.
dol.
dol.
doi.
dol.
ss,ciay
ss, clay, sh
ss,ciay
ss, clay
ss, clay
55
55
SS
SS
55
SS
ss
sand
sand
55
35

SS
55
SS
55
55
SS
55
Is
sh
55
55
ss, si It, clay
ss, si It, clay
55
S5
sh, ss
ss, sit, sand
ss, sit, sand
500
621
750
700
270
630
2,590
2,590
122
225
225
225
as
220

415



160
unknown
unknown
170
30

76
50
200
200
200
160
75
70

50
50
SO

200
2CO
280
185
185
flrbuckle group
ftr buckle
ftr buckle
flrbuckle
ftr buckle
ftrbuckle
Knox
Knox
Miocene age
Miocene age
aiocsne age
aiocene age
aiocene age
sediaentary
Nacatccii
Frio
Miocene
Miocene
Miocene
sand
unknown
unknown
Jascer-Sal aquifer
Jasper sal aquifer

Upoer Miocsne
" Miocene
Upper Miocene
I'oper Miocene
Upoer Miocene
pleistocene
pleistocene *
Ket Line

Hosston
Hosston




Miocsne


                                                       Page 2

-------
                                    INJECTION Z0f£ CHftRfiCTERISTICS OF CLflSS I HH UELLS
State
FflCILITY Nflffi
WELL NO.
LITHL06Y
Thknss
Nane

Shell Cheaical Coapany

Shell Oil Coapany, East site






Shell Oil Coapany, West site


•

Stauffer Cheaical Coapany


TENNECO OIL COKPflNY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Hitco Cheaical Corporation, Gretna
yitco Cheaical Corporation,Hahnville

Wyandotte Cheaical Corporation
BflSF Hyandotte


Detroit Coke Ccapany


3
4
5
4
5
6
7
a
9
a
a
2
5
&
9
2
1
3
7
3
4
5
A
2
1
G
2
3
1
7
&
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
sand
ss
SS
ss
55
SS
55
SS
SS
55
55
55, Sh
55, Sh
SS
55
55
SS
SS

55
55
55
55
SS
SS
SS
55
55
SS
55, Sh
55
ss, clay
55
55



SS
55
55
SS
SS
170
32
as
213
121
190
186
100
80
150
&£
75
70
200
62
180
130
130

*80
*80
116
180
180
130
72
200
200
100
2,000
500
500
5,500




1,180
1,260
436
169
4t-3

sand

Pliocene
Pliocene
Miocene
Miocene
Miocene
Miocene

Miocene
Pliocene
Pliocene
Pliocene
Miocene
Fleaing
Fleaing
Fleaing








Miocene
Miocene
Miocene
" Hosston
Nacatoch fora.
Nacatoch fora.
Miocene sand




Mt. Siaone
St. Siaon
Eau Claire, Mt.
Eau Claire 4 Mt.
Eau Claire t ft.







































Siaon
Siaon
Sison
                                                         Page 3

-------
                                     INJECTICN ZONE CHflRflCTERISTICS OF CUSS I HH WELLS
Stats
                FfiCILlTY
HELL NO.
LITHOLCSY
Thknss
Nae
IS
NC
CH
Dow Chen, Co.



E. I. Dupont,Montaaue
Ford Hotor Co., Rouge Steel

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis J Co.



5
2
4
a
1
D-l
D-2
1
2
1
3
A
Is.
Is.
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
Is
Is.

55
SS

15
ica
62
WO
116
381
58
297
209
as*
825
Dudee
Dudee
Sylvanu
Sylvania




Franconia,Salesville
Sylvama
flau Claire, Wt.
Dundee
Traverse

St. Sis»n
Mt. Siacn

Siaon





The Upjohn Co.

Total Petroleui Inc.*

Velsicol Chen. Corp.

Filtrol Corp.
rEHOFINfl
flrsco Steel Corp.

Calhio Cheaical Inc.*

Cheaical Waste fianagesent, Inc.
          Sohio Chemical Coapany, Vistron
          United States Steel Corporation
          flcrico Chsfl. co.
          flaerican flirlines  Inc.
                                                            15
                                                                                          203
                                                               SflM),SILT,!
                              200
                                          Traversa,Detroit  Siver
1
2
2
1
OB '5
55
I s, do I
ls,dol.
55
sm SILT, CL
214
195
150
1,212
200
tar-shall
Dudee
Dudee
Hosston
TUSCAlCOSfl
                            •njSCflLOGSfi  (CHEST.
17 fl
GB 4
1
2
1
2
8
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
1
2
1
SWD,SILT,CL
SBND,SILT,CL
55
55
ss, dol.
55, dol.
SS
55
55
55
SS
55
55
SS
55
55
S3
Is, chert
Is, ss, dol
ls,ss, dol
200
200


225
225
I3S
110
70
108
140
110
352
343
353
53
57
1,333
1,307
1,307
TUSCfiLOGSfi (CHEST.
TUSCflLOCSfl
St. Simon
Mt. Sinon
- Mayrtarcville, Hooe
Mayrardv i He, Sons
St. Siacn
«. Siscn
Mt. SiKcn
^. Siaon
Mt. Siaon
Kt. Siaon
St. SiMn
St. Sison
Mt. Sision
Mt. SiKin
M-t. c ; -nr-
! i W • W A.ilU'i i
Ar buckle
flrbuckle
fir buckle
                                                           Page 4

-------
                                     INJECTION ZONE CHflRftCTERISTICS OF CLASS I M HELLS
State
FRCILITY NfiJC
HELL NO.
LI7HCL08Y
Thknss
Name
Jfl
Chwical Resources Inc.
Kaiser

Rockwell International
Sosex
Hanervill Paper Co.


1
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
Is, sand
dol,55
dol.,55
55, dol,ls
Is, dol, chert
Is
Is
Is
1,257
465
444
1,298
£33
"70
-70
"70
ftrbuckle, Basal
fir buckle
ftrbuckle
flrbuckle
fir 1 buckle
Bass Island Forts.
Bass Island Form.
Bass Island Form.
          ftnoco Oil Co.
          ftrco Chen.  CO.,  Lyondale plant
          Badische Corp. (Dow Badische Co.)

          Browning - Ferris Industries
          Celanese Chesical Co.
          Celanese Chemcal Co.,Clear Lake plant

          Chanel in,  Soltex  t ICI,  Corpus Christi Petro

          Chaparral  Disposal Co. (BFD*
          Chenical Haste Management
          CHEHICfll WflSTE MfififlSEKENT, INC

          CoBinco ftwrican Inc.
          Disposal Systems, Inc.
          E.  I.  Dupont,Beauaount

          E.  I.  Dupont,Houston plant


          E.  I.  Dupont, Ingleside


          E.  I.  Dupont,Sabine River works
                                  5
                                  4
                                  3
                                  2
                                  1
                                  3
                                  2
                                  1
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  4
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  1
                                  2
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  1
                                  1
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  3
                                  1
                                  2
                                  9
                                  10
                                  8
Is, sand
dol, 55
dol.,55
55, dol, Is
Is, dol, chert
Is
Is
Is
sand
sand
55
sand, clays
55, Sh
55
SS
55
SS
SS
55
55
SS
55
55, clay
ss, clay
dol.
55
SflNDS
55, Sh
55
55
55
55
55
55, sh, clay
ss, clay
ss, clay, sh
55
SS
55
1,267
465
444
1,298
£33
"70
-70
"70
" 200
"200
200
335
254
285
450
300
225
235
300
200
800
300
670
670
850
1,230
2300
500
4%
"500
2,200
2,200
173
1,205
153
10
2,100
68
42
                                          Miocene
                                          Miocene
                                          Miocene
                                          Frio
                                          Frio
                                          Frio, finahuac
                                          Catahoula

                                          Heterostegina

                                          Miocene
                                          Miocene

                                          Lower Miocene

                                          Jackson,Frio
                                          Jackson
                                          San flndres

                                          CflTflHOCLA
                                          Basal Frio
                                          Oakville
                                          Ockville
                                          Frio
                                          Frio
                                          Frio
                                          Catahoula, Oakville
                                          Catahoula
                                          Oakville
                                          lower Miocene
                                          Miocene
                                          Miocene
                                                           Page 5

-------
State
           INJECTION ZONE OiflRflCTERISTICS OF CLPSS I HH «ELLS




FfiCILITY NfiK                     WELL NO.       LI7HCLCSY       Thknss
Nase





E. I. Dupont, Victoria









Eraoak, Inc.
General Aniline and Fila Cora.

*
Silbraltar Wastewaters, Inc.
Malone Service Co.

Xerichea co.
Monsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Eaycu



flonsanto Co.

ffiillios Cheaical Co.

Potash Co. of flarerica Division
Shell Cheaical Co.

3CNICS INTESNflTIDNflL

Velsicol Cheaical Co,


Vistrcn Corporation


Usste-*atsr Inc.
Witco Cheaical Co., Houston

Witco Cheaical Co. , Marshal 1
7
6
8DN3
5
4
2
3
A
5
5
7
8
9
10
1
i
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
0-3
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3

ss
S5
SS
53
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
55,5.1
sh,ss
SS
35
SS
SS
S3
SS
SS
ss, clay, ah
ss,clay
ss, sh
ss, sh
ss
ss
ss
ss
sand
ss, sh
ss, =n


ss
ss
ss
ss,sn
55, Sh
ss
Is
ss, sh
ss, sh
Is

700
700 •
700
700
WO
430
3S2
3%
386
337
430
4€0
232
441
700»
3S4
410
362

1,000
3,100
80
135

4,400
300
491
447
1,235
1,225
155
850
850



1,400
910
1,500
1,5<50
634
200
50
1,945
315


lower ,aiocene


Catahoula
Catahoula
Catanouia
Catahouia
Cathoula
Catahoula*
Catanoula
Catahoula
Greta
Catahaula
Basil Frio
Miocene
Miocene
Miocene
Wood hire


Frio


Miocene
Miocene
Catahoula
Catanoula
' Lo*«er Granite Wash.
Lo»*er Granite Wash.
Glorietta
Basai,Frio
Basal, F-io


Miocsne


Middle Frio
Middle Frio
Middle Frio
flnanuac
Frio
Frio
Blossoffl
                                                           Pace 6

-------
                                     INJECTION  ZONE CWRflCTERISTICS OF CLflSS I HH WELLS




State                     FflCILITY'NWC                     HELL NO.      LITHOLOSY       Thknss               Na«e
                                                           2            ls,ss            50          Blosson




WY        WYCON CSiEMICflL COXPfiNY
                                                          Paoe 7

-------

-------
                                     CONFINING ZONE CHflRflCTERISTICS OF CLASS I HU UELLS
ate
FflCILITY NftME
        flrco fllaska Inc.
        Stauffer Chenical Co.
        Ethyl Corp.
        Great Lakes Che*ical Corp.,  Main plant
        Sreat Lakes Chwical Corp.,  South plant
        flerojet Strategic Propulsion Company
        Rio Bravo Disoosal Facility

        SHELL OIL COMPftNY
        U.S.  CORP. OF ENGIfCESS fiND tHWICft. CORP.

        Kaiser flluninua t Chemical Co.
        Monsanto Coapany
        Allied Cheau  Co.
        Cabot Corn.

        LTV Steel Conpany*
        Velsicol Corp.
        Bethlehes Steel Corperat ion,Burn Harbor Plant

        General Electric

        Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
        Indiana Fam Bureau Cooperative
        Inland Steel Coaoany*

        Midwest Steel
        Pfizer Mineral and Pigaent Co.

        Uniroyal Ire. *
        United States Steel Corporation

        Sherwin Williaas
WELL NO.

2*
1*

3
I
2

1
2
3X
4
5

1
1
                                  1
                                  3
                                  1
                                  2

                                  1
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  1
                                  2

                                  2*
                                  1*
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1
                                  IN3
                                  2
                                  1
                                  1*
                                  1*
                                  2*
                                  1
                                  IN9
LITHOLCSY
ss
pemafrost
clay
clay
clay
marls, chalk
sh,Barls
sh,narls
sh,narls
sh,Barls
SS,Silt
sh,silt
dol,anhy *
clay
clay
clay
dol.
sh
sh
sh
sh,ls.
sh
sh
Silt.
dol, sh, sit
55, Sh

sh
SS,SH
sh
sh
sh
sh
C.Z. TWNSS
1,500

IK)
150
150
"800
800
335
335
335
500
900
500
215 lower
215 lower
215 lower
712 uoper
211
211
3S8
274
110
63
68
387
23 lower
52.5
200
700 flVS *
68
250
600
400
Name
Persiafrost




Brcvmstown, Ozan
Saratoga, flnnona
Saratoga, ftnnona
Saratoga, flnnona
Saratoga,flnnona
Valley spring-lone
Freesan-Jewett
Cecar Keys
Bucatunna
Bucatunna
Bucatunna
Prarie du Chieri*
MaQuike.li
:*aquoketa
Eau Claire
St. Senevieve
New abany
B-cao
B-cao
Eau Claire t Granite
Tar Springs, upper ly
B-cap

Eau Claire
Eau Claire
Eau Claire

Eau Claire
                                               ls,Sh,55
                             1,273
                                                           Page 1

-------
State
             CONFINING ZONE DiflRfiCTcRISTICS  OF  CLfiSS  I WJ WELLS




FflCILITY Nff€                     WELL  NO.       LlTriOLQGY      C. Z. TWNSS
Hate
KY
Lfl

Vulcan Materials Co.




E. I. Duoont De Nenours i Co.

American Cyanaiid Co.




flrcadian Corporation*
fit las Processing Co.
BflSF Wyandotte Corporation
Borden Chenical Co.


Browning-Ferris Industries (CECQS)
Chevron Chesical Co.

Citgo Petrol eia Corp.*



L I. Duoont, Lao lacs






Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
International Sinerais and Cheaical Corp.

Monsanto Cheaical Coacany,Luhng plant

NfiSfl, Michoud Sssesbly Facility*

Rollins Environsantal Services of Lfl, Inc
Rubicon Cheaical Inc.

2
4
3
7
3
3
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
1
2
3
I
2
4
3
7
5
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
t
i.
1
2
Is, sh,ss
ls,sh,ss
Is, sh,ss
ls,sh,ss
Sh, Is, 55
IS, 5h,S5
dol,ls.
dol,ls
sn,ss
55, Sh
Sh, 55
clay
clay
sh,clay

sh
sh
sh
sh
sh,clay
sh
sh




sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh

sh
sh
sh, SB, silt
clay
sn
sh
sh,ss
sh, clay, sit
sh, clay, sit
1,350
3,300
3,300
3,800
3,300
3,300
700
700
1,350
1,750
1,750
1,360
1,900
1100

275



40-80
40
40
200
200


100
70
120
100
100
40
40


320
315
"1,200
*


1080
45-*
35+



Wellington *.o

Wellington to
Trenton, Slack
Trenton/SlacK
Miocsns age
fliocere ane
aiocane age
.iiocsne age
aiccsne age •
sedimentary

Miocene
Miocene
Siocere?

shale
unknown
unkncunn
Burksville
Burkevtiie


iJDper Miocene
Miocene
Uocer :iiccere
Ucser Miocene
Uooer ;1iocsna
pliocene
PllOC2!'«4
Anahuac Ft.

SI: so
Sligo




Miocene





Siscson

Siapson
R,Chazy
R/Chazy




































                                                             Page 2

-------
•te
             OPINING ZONE CHfiRfiCTERISTICS OF CLASS I HM WELLS




FACILITY r*5**                    'SET NO.       LITHQLCSY      C.Z.  THKNSS
                                                                                                               Name

Shell Chemcal Company

Shell Oil Coflipany, East site






Shell Oil Coapany, West site




Stauffer Cheaical Company


TEWECO OIL COMPANY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Witco Chemical Corporation, Gretna
Witco Cheaical Corporation,Hahrwille

Wyandotte Cheaical Corporation
BflSF Wyandotte


Detroit Coke Ccsoany


Do« Chea. Co.


3
4
5
4
5
6
7
9
9
2
8
a
5
5
9
2
1
3
?
3
4
5
4
Z
I
6
2
3
1
7
&
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
sh,clay,slt
sh, sit, clay
SH
ss,clay,slt
55, clay, sit
silt, clay
sit, clay, sh
silt, clay
silt, clay
55, sit, clay
sit, clay, sh
sit, clay, sh
sit, clay, sh
sit, clay, sh
sit, clay, sn
silt, clay
silt, clay
silt, clay

sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
clay, sh, sit
clay, silt
clay, sit, sh
sh
sh
clay
sh




sh,dol
sh,dol
ss, ls,dol
sh, Is, do!
ls,doi,sh

sh
sh
170*
75
200
300
108
48
4oa
320
400+
130*
106
95
120
.140
365
190
390
390

N70
N70
200
200
200
200
200
150
150
200



600




700
700









Pliocene
Pliocene
Wiocene
Miocene
Miocene
Miocene

Miocene
Pliocene
Pliocene
Pliocene
Miocene
Fleming
Flesir.q
Fleming

*








Miocene
-







Prairie du Chien
Prairie du Chi en




fintriB, Sunbury
Antrim, Subury
                                                          Page 3

-------
Stats
             CONFINING ZONE OttRfiCTERISTICS OF CLPS3 I  HW WELLS




FflCILITY NflME                     WELL NO,       LITKOL06Y      C.Z.  7HKNSS








MS
NC



OH














GK



E.I. DuDcnt,Montaoue
Ford fetor Co., fouge Steel
Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis 4 Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleua Inc.*

Velsieol Chea. Corn.
Filtrol Coro.
HERCCFINfl



ftrsco Steel Coro.

Calhio CheBical Inc.*

Chemical Waste tenacesent, Ire.





Sohio Cheaicai Ccaoany, Vistron


United States Steel Corporation

3grico Chest, eo.
ftserican flirhnes Inc.

Cheaical Resources Irs:.
8
I
D-l
D-2
1
2
1
3
^
2
1
Z
2
1
OB 5
15
17 A
OB 4
1
I
1
2
6
2
3
4
5
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
1
2
1
1


sh
sh

ls,sh
sh
5h
sh
CLfiY, SILT
CLflY,SILT
CLflY, SILT
CLAY, SILT


isoeroeable
laoeraeaoie
dol
dol
dol
dol
dol
dol
dol
dol
dol
sh, Is, dol.
sh, Is, dol.
sn
sh
sh
Sh, 15



-830

ACO uoper
61 uooer

912
100
100(750-850
100(750-530
100


75
75
2,072
1,072
2,072
2, 072
2,072
2,072
400
400
400
1,SSO
1,250
361
40
40
30


Sritria,£l!swcrtr,*
Ellsxorth,flntria*

3aypor;-Micnigan
Bell
Coldxater, Sntr-.s

3UO' CS£2<
SLACK CREEK (CHES
3LAC< C^HK
ELPCX CSES<




Ross
'one
fose
Hoae
fiCTO
Rome










T.PGE












Eau claire 4 iccr.esrar
Eau cla:r« !• 3cc.i
ester
Eau claire t Rochester
Tosistcwn, Rosa,
Tcsistcxn,3cs-e,
Wood ford

Woodforti
Chattarocqa






                                                             Pace

-------
                                     COfFININB Z0f£ CWRflCTERISTICS OF CLftSS I HH HELLS
ate
FACILITY NWE
WELL NO.
LITWLOSY
C.Z.  THKNSS
Naae
Kaiser

Rockwell International
Soeex
Hawnermill Paper Co.


1
2
1
1
3
2
1
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh, Is, chert
Is, sh, chert
Is, sh, chert
57
58
52
24
*395
*395
V395
Chattanooga
Chatanooga
Chattanooga
Hood ford



        ftnoco Oil Co.
        flrco Chew.  CO.,  Lyondale plant
        Badische Corp.(Dow Badische Co.)

        Browning - Ferris Industries
        Celanese Cheaical Co.
        Celanese Cheaical Co. , Clear Lake plant

        Champlin,  Soltex  4 ICI,  Corpus Christi Petro

        Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFD*
        Chemical Waste Hanageaent
                 WftSTE HflNflGEIENT, INC
        Coainco ftnerican Inc.
        Disoosal Systems,  Inc.
        E.  I.  Duciont,BeauiBCunt

        E.  I.  Duoont, Houston plant
        L  I.  Duoont,Ingleside
        E.  I.  Duoont,Sabine River wrks
5
4
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
a
7


sh,clay
sh,clay
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh,clay

clay
clay
clay
clay
sh
sh
ss,sh,clay
sh, ss, clay
Is
clay
CLflY,SHffi_E


sh
sand, clay
sand, clay
ss, sh
55, Sh
ss, sh
ss, clay
sh,ss
ss, clay
sand,sh
ss, sh
ss, sh



Nl,200
-1200
"1,200
A10
370
400
1,500
1,500

1,200
1,300 -
1,200
1,200
3,100
3,100
1,500
1,500
3,400

4000


600
2,470
2,470
810
310
810
39
2,000
990
810
810
310



Lissie and Miocene
Lissie,. Miocene
Lissie, Miocene
flnahuac
flnahauc
flnahuac
tentgomery, Betty
Jasper, Beaumont

Beaumount
Beaunount
Beaufflont
Beaumount
Pliocene, Miocene
Jasper

flnahauc
Srayburg,Yates
-



Q^aiuac
Lac art o
Lagarto
Fr 10, flnahauc
Frio flnahauc
Frio, flnahauc
Lagarto
Oakville
Lagarto
Jasper, flnahauc
flnahauc
finahauc

                                                           Page 5

-------
                                      CONFINING ZONE CHflRflCTESISTICS OF CLPS3  I HU WELLS
State
NWE
KcLL NO.
C.Z.  TWNSS
Naae




E. I. Dupont, Victoria









Eraoak, Inc.
General firuline and Ft la Corp.


Silbraltar Wastewaters, Inc.
Salon* Service Co,

ferichea co.
Xonsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou



Monsanto Co.

Phi 11 IBS Chesical Co.

Potash Co. of ftaerica Division
Shell Cheaical Co,

SCNIC3 IMTEHNflTICm.

Velsicol Cheaical Co.


Vistron Corporation


Waste-water Inc.
Witco Cheaical Co, , Houston

Uitco Cheaical Co., Marshall

6
flDH3
5
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
D-3
1
1
2
i
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
2
55, Stl
55, Sh
ss, sn
sand,sh
sn
sh
sh
sh
sh,clay
sh
sh
sh
sh
sh
Sh, 55
55, Sh
55, Sh
55, Sh
clay,sti,ss
clay,sh,ss
sh
sh, clay, ss
55, Sh
ss, sh
ss, sh
sh
Is
Is
Syp
sh
sh
810
310
810
810
1,900
1,900
1900
1,900
1,900
1,900
1,900
1,900
1,900
1,900
300
2,490
2,490
2,490
1,300
1,300
sao
3,400
1,363
700
3,500
3, SCO
1,230
1,245
235
5€0
5£0
Jasaer,ftnahauc
Jasper, finahauc
Jasper, ftnahauc
Jasper, ftnahauc
Lesarto
Lagarto
Lagarto
Ugarto, flnahuac
Lagarto
Lagarto
Lagarto
Lagarto
Lagarto
Lenarto
ftnahauc, Burkevills
pliocene
Pliocene
Pliocene
Lissie
Lissie
flnahauc



Jascer
Jasaer
flrkosi: Liae
ftrkosic Line
Blaine
Qnanauc
finahauc
                                                                        sn,ss
                                                                        sh
                                                                        sh
                                                                        sh
                                                                        sh,ss
                                                                        sh
                                                                        sh
                                                                        sh
                                                                        clay,Is,sit
                                                     500
                                                     425
                                                     £00
                                                     600
                                                     £00
                                                     S,000
                                                     550
                                                     710
                                                     230
                                             Berkville
                                             flnahauc

                                             flnanauc
                                             finahauc
                                             Fleam:
                                             flnahuac
                                             Frio, anarauc
                                             SI enrose
                                             Navarro
                                                            Pace 6

-------
                            CONFINING ZONE CHflRfiCTERISTICS OF CLflSS  I HW WELLS




               FflC!LITY-N»€                    WELL NO.       LITHOtCGY      C.Z. TWNSS             Naae
WYCON D^MICflL CtWPfiNY
                                                 Page  7

-------

-------
                             SECTION 4
Data on
   "The location and size of all drinking water aquifers penetrated
   by the well, or within a one-mile radius of the well, or within
   two hundred feet below the well iniection point;"

-------

-------
USDH f 1  IN THE VICINITY OF CUSS  I HH «ELLS




                 ].         USDH  fw?XE
DEPTH
TWNSS
TDS
Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Coapany
Agrico Chen. co.
Allied Chen. Co.
American Airlines Inc.

American Cyananid Co.




AHOCO Oil Co.




Arcadian Cor Deration*
Arco Alaska Inc.

Arco Chew. CO., Lyondale plant


Araco Steel Corp.

Atlas Processing Co.
Badische Corn. (Dow Badische Co.)

BASF Wyandotte


BASF Hyandotte Corporation
Bethlehem Steel Cor per at ion, Burn Harbor Plant

Borden Cheaical Co.


Browning - Ferris Industries
Browning-Ferris Industries (CECOS)
Cabot Corp.

Calhio Cheaical Inc.*

Celanese Chesical Co.



Celanese Chesical Co. , Clear Lake plant
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
5
4
3
2
1
1
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
3
D-l
2*
1*
1
2
3
1
1
2
1.
1
2
4
1
2
3
1
Laguna Fn.
Verdigris Alluviu*
up. Pennsylvanian
Nowate
Nowate
Point Bar
Point Bar
Point Bar
Point Bar
Point Bar


Chicot
Chicot
Chicot
Plaaueains aauifers
none
none

Chicot
Chicot


Uilcox



none
none

Calumet
Caluaet




Chicot









130 500
30 10

75 50
25 50
(160
(160
(160
(160
(160


1000 900
1000 900
1000 900
125 100



500 500
500 500


300
1,300 1,000
1300 1000



-
6 70





700 200









200
t
1,000









(3000
(3000
(3000
500



NA
NP



(10,000
(10000




(1000





<10,000









                  Page 1

-------
                                       USDU II IN THE VICINITY OF CLflSS I HU WELLS
                FfiCILITY .
WELL NO,
    USDW i iwe
 DEPTH
THKNSS
   IDS
Chasplin, Soltex  t ICI, Corpus Christi Petro

Chaoarral Disoosal Co. (BFD*
Chesicai Resources Inc.
Chemical Haste tenageaerrt
Chemcal Waste Management, Inc.
OOICfiL WfiSTE WSNfiSOOT, INC

Chevron Chenical Co.

Citgo Petroleua Coro.*
Ccainco Pserican Inc.
Detroit Coke Cosoany
Disposal Systems, Inc.
Dow Che*.  Co.
L  I. Duoont,BeauflOunt

E.  I. Ducont,Houston plant


E.  I. Dupont,Ingleside


E.  I. Dupont,Laolace
E. I. Duccnt,Sabina River works
1
2
1
1
1
ifl
a
3
4
5
5
1
2
2
3
1
2
\
3
1
1
2
3
1
5
2
4
a
2
I
1
2
3
1
2
3
7
3
2
1
9
10
Edwards-Trinity
Qlluviu!»
Big Liae
Big Line
Big Li*
Big Lies
Big Line
Big Lias
unknown
unknown
Ciicot,ucoer
Chicot,ucoer
110
32
50
50
50
50
50
50


150
180
110
32
551
550
550
550
550
5SO


100
100
(3000
(2000
7000 *flX
3000 »!fiX
3000 W
3,000 MX
3400 "fiX
3000 *«




shallow aquifsr
uoper Chicot
Lissie
Lissie
Beauaont clay
BeauDcnt clay
Shallow Point 3ar
Siallcw point bar
shallow Point bar
shallow coint bar
Shallow (Pt. Bftr)
shallow
shallow (Pt. Bar)

fllta-ioraa
300
4CO
400
300
300
70*
70*
70*
70*
70*
70*
70*

£00
200
6%
550
300
300
60
50
50
60
50
SO
50

130
SCO
)1100
11100
5,225*
5,225*
SCO
500
500
500
500
500
SCO

650
                                                           Pace 2

-------
USDH II IN T>£ VICINITY OF  CLflSS I  HW HELLS
- FACILITY Wire






E. I. Dupont, Victoria









E, I. Duoont De Neaours t Co.

E. I. Dupont, Montaque
Esipak, Inc.
Ethyl Corp.
Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Filtrol Corp.
Ford Motor Co., Rouge Steel

General ftniline and Filn Corp.


General Electric

Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Silbraltar Hastewaters, Inc.
Great Lakes Cheaical Cora., Main plant
Great Lakes Cheancal Corp., South plant

e
Hawneraiill Paoer Co.


HERCOFINA



Hoskins Manufacturing Co.

Indiana Farn Bureau Cooperative
"'«E1 NO,
a
7
6
ADN3
4
5
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
10
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
D-l
D-2
1
2
3
2
1
1
1
2
3X
4
5
3
2
1
16
17 A
OB 4
OB 5
1
1
INS
USDW 1 f«WE
fllta-Losa


upper chicot


Beauaont *
Beaunont *
Beauaont *
Beauaont *
Beauaont *
Beaumont t
Beauaont *
BeauBont *
Beauaont *
BeauHont *
fllluviua
Alluviua

Upper Chicot *
Cockfield fora.
Plaqueaine
Moody' s Branch


Chicot
Chicot





Alluvial deposits





,
RECGNmTOFINE!}}
RECENT
RECDNT
RECONT

Glacial Drit
Nfl
DEPTH
600





500 *
500 *
500 *
500
500
500 *
500
500
500
500*
113
113

150 t

500
154


>380
" 3BO





0







0
0
0



THKNSS
130





*
t
t
*
*
i
*
*
t
t
113
113

150 *


£S


1200
1200


-


85






250
50
50
50



TDS
680





1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000*
1,000 *
1,000 *
1,000 *
1,000*
400
400

1,700

3000
400


930
S30












U50
U50
(150
(150



                   Page 3

-------
                                       USDU  II  IN  THE  VICINITY OF CLASS I HW WEL1S
FPCILI7Y Nfi«
Inland Steel Cospany*

International Minerals and Cheaical Corp.

Kaiser

Kaiser ftluaimu J Chesical Co.
LTV Steel Coapany*
Ha lone Service Co.

tenches co.
Midwest Steel
Monsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou



*tonsanto Cheaicai Coaoany,Luling plant
tonsanto Co.

tonsanto Company


NflSfl, Nichoud fisseably Facility*

Parka Davis J Co.



Pfizer Mineral and Pigaerrt Co.

Phillips Cheaical Co.

Potash Co. of flaerica Division
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
Rockwell International
Rollins Environasental Services of Lfl, Inc
Rubicon Cheaical Inc.


Shell Dheaical Co.

Shell Cheaical Ccapany

WELL SO.
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1*
4*
1
2
3
j
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
2
1
3
4
!*
2*
D-3
D-2
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
2
5
4
USDV) 1 Nfl!€
glacial drift

Sparta
Sparca


Ocala
St. Peter ss.


Chicot

Upper Chicot

Upper Chicct


Chicot
Upper Chicot
sand and gravel
sand and gravel
sand and jravel






Calmwt
Caluset
no aauifer
no aquifer
Ogallala
Kern River
Floodplain allluviua
Plaqueaine



Chicot
Chicot


DEPTH
0

300
800


370
1,474


600

300

surface


1,100
1,100
440
440
440










210
2,500
0
*900



1,000
1000


THKNSS
160

600
600


320
113


600

200

1,300


1,000
1,000
4*0
440
440






" 40 avq
»0 avg


240
2,500
varies
"700



1,000
1000


TDS
(1000

(10,000
(10,000


unknwn



200



BT3


3,000
3, CCO
10
10
10






(1000
coco


400
10, 000





730*
730*


Sffll OIL
Shell Oil Ccaoany, East site
fllluviua
160
160
(1,000
                                                           Pane

-------
                                       UBDW II IN THE VICINITY OF CLflSS  I HU HELLS
               ' FW7LITY
Shell Oil Coapany, West site
Sherwin Uilliaas

Sohio Cheaical Coapany, Vistron
Sotnex
SONICS  INTERNflTIONflL

Stauffer Cheaical Co.
Stauffer Cheaical Cospany
TENNECO OIL COWftNY
Texaco Inc.
The Uojohn Co.
Total Petroleua Inc.*

U.S.  CORP. OF ENGINEERS fiND CKEfllCfiL CORP.
Uniroyal Inc.
Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
Universal Oil Products
WELL'NO

4
5
6
7
8
9
8
2
5
6
9
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
3
?
3
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
1
2

1
2
3
1
1
IN9
2»
6
5
DEPTH
                                     THKNSS
                           TBS
fllluviua
fllluviun
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
Soffeyvalle
Coffeyville
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
30
30
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
30
30
(250
(1,000
250
250
(£50
(250
(250
(250
(250
(250
(250
2,800
2,300
fllluviua
fllluviua
fllluviua
Plaquesine Scnzales
Plaqueaine-Gonzales
Plaoueaine-Sonzales

100'  sand
100'  sand
Norco-Sraaercy
Norco-6ras*rcy
Norco-Graaercy
Norco-GraHercy
Norco-Gramercy

Saginaw formation
Songales aquifer
Songales aquifer
Songales aquifer

Ohio River flquifer
upper aquifer
Suo river aquifer
Sparta
Sparta
150
150
150
1S6
1%
196
40
100
150+
150
150+
56
56
56
shallow
snailcx
39
39
39
665
665
&65
(1,000
(1000
                                                                                        443
750
)50
750

£6
664
£5
           124
                                     375*
                                     375*
                                     375*

                                     43
                                     76
                                     43
                       10,000
                       10,000
                       10,000

                       292

                       292
                                                          Page 5

-------
                                       USDW II IN THE VICINITY OF CLfiSS  I HU WELLS
                FACILITY Nfi*E
Wyandotte Cheaical Ccrocration
WYCCN DOICPL CDflPfiNY
WELL SO,
USDW 1 NA*E
DEPTH
TWNSS
TBS

Velsicol Chea. Corp,
Velsicol Chemical Co.


Velsicol Corp.

Vistron Corporation


Vulcan Materials Co.




Waste-nater Inc.
yitco Chenical Co. , Houston

Witco Che«icai Co., Marshall

Mitco Cheaical Corporation, Sretna
Uitco Cheaical Corooration,Hahnville

7
2
2
3
1
1
2
1
2
3
4
3
7
a
9
i
i
2
3
2
1
t
2
                                                               Soarta
                                                               fllluviua/Terracs
                                                               fllluviua/Terrace
                                                               fll1uviua/Tsrracs
                                                               fllluviua/Terracs
                                                               fllluviia/Terracs
                     20
                     S&
                     20
                     20
           -80
           80
           80
           30
           30
            "300
            "300
            "300
            -300
            -300
                                                               Sand  I
                     200
           100
            253*
                                                           Page  5

-------
                FACILITY
USDH »2 IN THE VICINITY




               HELL NO.
CLflSS I m WELLS




      USDH 2 Nft*
DEPTH
THKNSS
TDS
flrco fllaska Inc.

Stauffer Chemical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Chesical Corp. , Main plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., South plant


ftsrojet Strategic Propulsion Coapany
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
St€LL OIL COIPfiNY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS fiMD CHEMICftL CORP.
Kaiser Aluminum t Chemical Co.
Monsanto Coaoany


fill led Chen. Co.
Cabot Coro.

LTV Steel Ccaoany*
Velsicol Corp.

Bethiehea Steel Corporation, Burn Harbor Plant

General Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Fara Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Ccapany*

Midwest Steel
Pfizer Hineral and Pigssnt Co.

IJniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1


1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
H*
1*
2
1
1
IN3
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
INS


Miocene, Pliocene
Niocene, Pliocene
Miocene, pliocene
Soarta sand
Cockfield form.



Laguna Fra.



flvon Park
Upper Floridan
Upper Floridan
Upper Floridan






Valparaiso
Valparasio




Silvrian


Valparaiso
Valparaiso

aiddle aquifer


800 650
300 650+
800 650
500 50
100 200 av;



350 30



S30 570
1,150 £20
1, 150 220
1, 150 220





-
30 70


2,760


160 500


45 avg
45 avg

1,332 1,034


2,200
2,200
2,200
300
150 avg



200



base USDW
700
1,130
1,130












{1000





4,470
Sherwin Uilliams
                                                     Page 1

-------
                                  USuU 12 IN THE VICINITY OF CUSS I Kli WELLS
State FACILITY VWE

Vulcan Materials Co.




XY E.!. Dupont De Neisours I Co.

LA fiserican Cyanaaid Co.


.

Arcadian Cor Deration*
fit las Processing Co.
BflSF tyandotte Corporation
WELL NO.
2
4
3
7
a
9
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
D-l
USDW 2 NME






Hfl
NA
Graaercy
Graraercy
Grancrcy
Srasiercy
Grarercy
olaqueaiir* aquifers


DEPTH








210 avg*
210 avg*
210 avg*
210 avg*
210 avn*
300


THKNS3 TDS








100
100
100
100
100 250
300 300


Screen CJieuical Co.
Sroming-rerris Industries (CECCS)
Chevron Chesical Co.

Citgo Petroieua Corp.*
E.  I.  Dupont, Lajlacs
Ethyi Corp.  of Baton Rcuce
Georgia-Pacific CorMration
International Minerals and Chesical Cora.
     nto Chesical Ccsnany, Luiing plant

NfiSS,  Michoud Pssanfaly "acility*

Rollins Envircnsentai Services of Lfi, Ire
Rubicon Chesical Irs.
3
1
2
3
1
2
4
3
7
6
c;

-------
                  USDW 12 IN THE VICINITY OF CLflSS  I KU  WELLS

FACILITY 'Nft*£                    WELL NO.           USDW  2  NAJ€
Witco Chemical Corporation,Gretna
Uitco Cheaical Corporation,Hahnville

Wyandotte Cheaical Corporation

BASF Wyandotte


Detroit Coke Coaoany


Dow Chew. Co.
 DEPTH
THKNSS
5
1
1
2
D-2

1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
                                             Wilcox
                                             Uilcox
                                             Sand  II
190
190
400
                                             deep aquifer
70
200
   TDS
Shell Chemical Company

Shell Oil Coapany, East site






Shell Oil Conpany, West site




Stauffer Chemical Ccxaoany


TENNECO OIL COWPWIY


Texaco Inc.




Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products
3
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3 •
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1
7


Graraercy
Graaercy
Graaercy
Graraercy
Granercy
Graaercy
Sramercy
Gramercy
Srastercy
Gramercy
Granercy
Granercy
aquifer systems
aouifer systess
aquifer systeas

200' sand
200' sand
6onzales-»te* Orleans
Sonzales-New Orleans
Gonzales-New Orleans
Scnzales-New Orleans
Gonzaies-New Orleans



Uilcox


160
160
160
160
160
160
260
160
160
160
160
160
230
230
230

200

450
450
450
450
450



190 -


140
140
140
140
140
140
100
140
140
140
140
140
80
80
80

shallow
snallow
300
300
300
300
300






250
250
250
250
250
250
(1,000
250
250
250
250
250
615
615
615

2,000*
2,000*
658
653
658
658
658




350*
                                     Page 3

-------
                                           USDW  *2  IN  THE VICINITY OF OJSS  I HW WELLS
State
FACILITY »**€
WELL WJ.
IJSDW 2 .W£
DEPTH
TWSS
TDS

c.I. Dupont,flontaque
Ford tetor Co. , Rouge Steal

rcskins Manufacturing Co.
Par He Davis t Co.



The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleua Inc.*

Velsicol Dies. Corp.
,*S Filtrol Corp.
NC HERCCFINfl



CH flnco Steel Corp.

Calhio Dieaical Inc.*

Cheaicai Waste Managessnt, Inc.





Sohio Chemical Coapany, Vistron


United States Steel Corooration

CK flnrico Ches. co.
.2?!erican flirlines Inc.

Cheaicai Resources Ire.
Kaiser

3
1
0-1
D-2
1
i
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
G8 5
16
17 fl
G8 4
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
5
Ifl
i
2
3
1
2*
1
2
1
1
1
2




Coldwater SH 4^8





sands (along pine river 25 15


Cookfield formation 180 20S
PS DEEJBLflCX CS£S( 50 300
CEE DEE i a^cx CSEE< 50-350 soo
PEE DEElBLflCK CREEK 50 350
'PEE DEEiBLfiCX CREEK 30 350





-









ftt
Cologan 75 110
Oolooart 75 110
Checxbcard Is. 36 4


                                                                                                                        (3000
                                                              Page 4

-------
                  USDU K IN THE VICINITY  OF CLfiSS I  HH WELLS
FACILITY Nfi!€
HELL NO.
USDH 2 NAME
DEPTH
THKNSS
TDS
Rockwell International
Soaex
Haanerai 1 1 Paper Co.


Amoco Oil Co.




Arco Chen. CO., Lyondale plant


Badische Corp. (Dow Badische Co.)

Browning - Ferris Industries
Celanese Chemical Co.



Celanesa Cheaical Co. , Clear Lake plant

Chaaplin, Soitex J Id, Corous Christi Petro

Chaoarrai Disoosal Co. (BFD*
Chenical Waste Management
CHEMICfiL WASTE WWflGEXENT, INC

Coninco flsencan Inc.
Disposal Systems, Inc.
E. I. Duoont,Beauaount

E. I. Dupcnt, Houston plant


E. I. Duoont, Ingleside


E. I. Dupont,Sabine River norks




1 Hodenville Fa.
1
3
2
1
5
A
3
2
1
3
2 Evangel ine
1 Evangel ine
2
1
1
A
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1 Santa Rosa
1
1
2
1
1 lower Chicot
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
7
6
ffiMG lower chicot
0 19 980
1









1,870 1,350 340
1,870 1370 340











1300 150 3000


-

800 500 240



*









                                     Pace 5

-------
State
FACILITY
USDU *2 IN THE VICINITY  CF CLASS I * WELLS




               HELL .NO.           USDU 2 Nfl)€
DEPTH
THKNSS
TT5S


E. I. Dupont, Victoria









Eacak, Inc.
General flnilire and Fila Corp.


Gilbraltar wstewaters, Inc.
teione Service Co.
^enchen co.
Sonsanco Cheaical Co., Chocolate Eayou



tonsanto Co.

Phillips Chesical Co.

Potash Co. of fiaenca Division
Shell Cheaical Co.

SCNICS INTEHNflTICNfiL

Velsicol Cheaical Co.


Vistron Corporation


liaste-Tiatsr Inc.
Witco Chsnical Co. , Houston

lilt co Cheaical Co. , Marshall

5
4
2
3
4
5
&
7
3
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
5-3
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
2


Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lissie
Lower Chico:
Evangel ine
Evangel ine



Evangel ine
Lower Chi cot


Lower Chi cot
Evangel ine
Evangel ine



Evangel ine
Evangel ine















500
500
500
SCO
500
500
500
SCO
500
500
500





2,400
1,300



1,560
1,580



2,700-
2700















350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
2WO
2400



1,300
300



460
*60



1,700
1700















580
580
5800

580
580
580

580
560






10,000




10,000
10,000



1,750*
1,750*













                      L CCMPfiNY
                                                                Page 6

-------
                                USDW 13 IN THE VICINITY OF CLflSS I HH WELLS
                FRCILITY  N£t
DEPTH
THKNSS
TDS
ftrco fllaska Inc.

Stauffer Cheaical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Chenical Corp., Nam plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., South plant


Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Conpany
Rio 3ravo Disocsal Facility
SHELL OIL COMPfiNY
U.S. CCRP. OF ENGINEERS RND CHOIICfiL CORP.
Kaiser flluaiimim S Chemical Co.
Jtonsanto Coapany


fill led Chem. Co.
Cabot Corp.

LTV Steel Coaoany*
Velsicoi Corp.
•
Bethlehen Steel Corporation, Burn Harbor Plant

General Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Fana Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Coapany*

Midxest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigraent Co.

Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
2*
It
3
1
2
1
2
3X
A
5
1
1


1
3
1 •
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2*
It
2
1
i
IN3
2
1
It
1*
2*
1
INS





Cane river font.
Sparta sand '600 300 avg 350 avg







Lake city ' 1,260 650 unknown
Lower Floridan 1,730 360 12,000
Loer Floridan 1,730 360 12,800
Lower Floridan 1,730 360 12,800





-
Kankakee 50 40
Kankakee




St. Peter ss. 1,113 352 2000


Kankakee 30 avg
Kankakee 30 avg

bottom aquifer 4,278 1,306
Shemin Williams
                                                  Page 1

-------
Stats
KY
Lfl
                FflCILITY NOC
USD« 13 IN THE VICINITY CF CUSS I HW WELLS

                 WELL NO.          UDSW 3 Nfl*E
          Vulcan feterials Co.
E.I. Duoont Ds Nesours i Co,
finerican Cyanaaid Co.
          Arcadian Corooration*
          fit Us Processing Co.
          EfiSr Wyandotte Corporation
          Borden Chesical Co.
          Browning-Ferris Industries (CZCCS)
          Chevron Chemical Co.

          Citgo Petroleua Corp.*
          L I. Dupont, Laplace
          Ethyl Corp, of Saton Rouge
          Secrgia-Pacific Corporation
          International Minerals and Cheaical Corp.

          Monsanto Cheaical Ccacany,Luling ciant

          N'PSfl, Michoud h5=53bly Facility*

          Rollins Environssntai Services of Lfl,Inc
          Rubicon Cheaical  Inc.
DEPTH
                 1
                 2

                 1
                 2
                 3
                 *
                 5
                 1
                 L
                 D-l
                 1
                 •3
                 3
                 1
                 2
                 3
                 1
                 2
                 4
                 3
                 7
                 5
                 5
                 4
                 ^
                 2
                 i
                 *
                 i
                 1
                 1
                 2
                 I
                 2
                 2
                 1
                 i
                 1
                 2
TM
-------
                                 USDtt *3  IN THE VICINITY OF CLflSS I  HH WELLS
                FPCH.I7Y """
!ELL NO.
UDSH 3 NflfE          DEPTH       TKKNSS         TDS
Shell Chesical Coapany

Shell Oil Coapany, East site
Shell Oil Cotapany, West site
Stauffer Chemical Coaoany
TENNECQ OIL COMPflNY
Texaco Inc.
Uniroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Witco Chemical Corporation,Sretna
Witco Chesical Corporation.HahnvillB

Wyandotte Chenical Corporation

BflSF Wyandotte


Detroit Coke Coaoany


Dew Chen. Co.
5
4
5
6
7
a
9
2
a
2
5
6
3
2
1
3
3
4

Norco
Norco
Ncrco
Norco
Norco
Norco
Narco
Norco 4 Sonzales
Norco 4 Sonzales
Norco 4 Gonzales
Norco t Sonzaies
Norco 4 Gonzales



400' sand
.400' sand

300
300
300
300
300
300 '
450
300
300
300
300
300
215
215
215
' 460


550
550
550
550
550
550
150
550
550
550
550
550
80
80
80
8*
7*

450
450
450
450
450
1,750*
1,750*
450
450
250
450
450
722
722
722
6,500*
6,500*
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1
7

5
1
1
2
D-e

i
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
                                                                Sand  III
                                     1,200
                                 600
< 10,000
                                                    Page 3

-------
State
FACILITY HttE
USD* 13 IN THE VICINITY  OF  CUSS  I hW WELLS




                 WELL  NO.         LDSW 3
          Scaex
DEPTH
                                                                                                            THKNSS
TDi

E.I. Duaont,Montacue
Ford Motor Co. , touge Steel

Hoskir.s Manufacturing Co,
Parke Davis i Co.



The Upjohn Co,
Total Petroleu* Inc.*

Velsicol Che«. Coro,
,*S Filtrol Corn.
SC KERCGFINfl



OH flraco Steel Coro.

Calhio Chesical Inc.*

Chemical Waste Manageaent, Inc.





Schio Diesical Ccaoany, Vistron


United States Steel Corporation

OK ficrico Chen. co.
ftnerican flirlires Ire.

Cheaical Resourcss Irs.
Kaiser

Rccks*eil International
3
1
D-l
D-2
1 Sunoury S^
2
i
3
4
2
1 glacial drift
2
2
1 Sparta sand
08 5
IS
17 A
QS 4
1
2
1
2
6
2
3
4
5 '
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
i m
2 labene
1 Labette
1 Cleveland sand
1
2
1 Ncwata snale




1,366





105* 63


458 4C£













-






130 20)
ICO 200
(50 (34


13 39
                                                                                                                        400
                                                                                                                        250-3
                                                                                                                        (10, OC
              mili Paper Co.
                                                             Page  4

-------
LSDW 13 IN THE VICINITY OF CLflSS I HW WELLS
                 WELL NO.
UDSU 3 1WE
DEPTH
THKNSS
TDS


Aaoco Oil Co.




flrco Chea. CO., Lyondaie plant


Badische Corp. (Dow Badische Co.)

Browning - Ferris Industries
Celanese Cheaical Co.



Celanese Cheaical Co. , Clear Lake plant

Chaiaolin, Soltex i Id, Corpus Christi Petro

Chaparral Disposal Co. (BFD*
Chemical Haste Nanageuent
DOICfiL WflSTE SftNASEMENT, INC

Ccainco Aoerican Inc.
Di 53osa 1 Systess, Inc.
E. I. Dupont, BeauMount

E. I. Dupont, Houston plant


E. I. Dupont, Ingleside


E. I. Dupont, Sabine Hiver t»orks





E. I. Dupont, Victoria

2
1
5
A
3
2
1
3
2 Jasper
1 Jasper
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1 Evangel i ne
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
3
10
a
7
6
5
2 Soliad
3 Boliad








12,800 230 Nfl
12,800 250 Nfl








'







2,700 1900 700

-












350 250 680
850 250 680
                   Page 5

-------
                                           USDW 13 IN THE VICINITY OF CLASS  I KM WELLS
State
me
WELL NO.
UDSW 3 Nflt€
DEPTH
THKNSS








Eapak, IRC.
General flniline and Fila Corp.


Gilbraitar '*iste*aters, Inc.
?alone Service Co.
benches co.
fcrtsanto Cheaical Co., Chocolate Bayou



tonsanto Co.

Phillips Cheaical Co.

Sctasti Co. of ftserica Division
Shell Chemical Co,

SuNICS !NTERNfiT!CNftL

Velsicol Cheaical Co,


Vistron Corporation


i»'a3te-*ater Inc.
Hit co Chemical Co.,, Houston

Uitco Cheaical Co., Marshall
* Soliad
5 Goliad
5 Soliad
7 Soliad
3 Goliad
9 Soliad
10 Goliad
1 Goliad
1 Evangel me
1
I
3
1
1
2
1
44
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
0-3
1
1
2
1
2
a
i
3
1
2
3
i
2
1
3
850 £50 680
850 250 600
850 £50 680
850 25020 66X)
850 £50 600
850 250 660
850 250 680
850 £50 660
2,650 2,150 1,50C



















-









          '4YCCN CKE-'ICSL CC^PPNY
                                                               Page 6

-------
                             SECTION 5
Data on
   "Ihe location, capacity, and population served by each well
   providing drinking or irrigation water which is within a five-
   mile radius of the injection well;"

-------

-------
                FPCILITY PWE
SROUND-WflTER USftSE  IN A 5 MILE RfiDIUS OF  INJ.MELL




               NO.            NO.            f GF PUWH I OF PRWW 6 W USE
Public  TOP
ftrco Alaska Inc.

Stauffer Cheaical Co,


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., Main olant
Great Lakes Chenical Corp. , South plant


fterojet Strategic Propulsion Ceapany
Rio Bravo DisDosal Facility
SHELL OIL CQflPflNY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS RND CHEMICflL CORP.
Kaiser Aluaiinua t Chemical Co.
Monsanto Coapany


fill led Ches. Co.
Cabot Coro.

LTV Steel Coapany*
Velsicol Corn.

Bethlehea Steel Corporation, Burn Harbor Plant

General Electric

Ho'skins Manufacturing Co,
Irriiana Fara Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Company*

Midwest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigusnt Co.

Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
2*
1*
3
t
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
1


1
3
1
2
i
2
1
1
1
2
2*
1*
2
1
1
INS
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
INS
0 0
0 0
30 6
30 6
30 6
9 0
47 3



2
2 one aile radius


2,764 64
none in injection zone
none in injection zone
none in injection zone






12
12


7

28
28




none* none
0 none
0 0
24
24
24
9 109,200*
44 *




2


2,700








-












none
Sherwin Uilhaas
                                                       Page 1

-------
State
FfiCILITY
SROJWHiflTES USfi6E IN fl 5 MILE RADIUS CF  INJ.UELL




           WELL NO.            NO.             tGFPfjyWIGFPRWJSyiSS* Public   PC

Vulcan Materials Co.




KY E. I. Duoont De Seaours 4 Co.

Lfl feerican Cyanaaid Co.




fircadian Cor Deration*
Ptlas Processing Co.
33SF Wyandotta Corooration
Screen Cheiical Co.


Browting-Ferris Industries (CSCOS)
Chevron Chercical Co.

Citco Petroleua Coro. *



L I. Duoont,Lapiace






Ethyl Corp. o.f Baton Souce
Seor^ia-^acific Corporation
Intsrrational H:neral5 and Cheaicai Cors.

Monsanto 'CT-iecicai Ccapany,Luhr,g aiant

.SflSfl, ^ichoud fisssfflbly Facility*

2
4
3
7
3
S
1
2
1
2
3
A
5
1
i
D-l
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
4
3
7
5
5
4
3
2
1
i
1
1
1
2
^
2
2
1






215
215
9
9
9
9
9~
78
23
78 5
7B
78
78
41
6
5
57
57


24 within two ailes 1
24 within two ailes 1
24 Kitfnn two siles 1
24 within t»o ailes i
24 within two ailes 1
24 within tx> ailes 1
24 in two ailss 1
24 5
48
IS
IS
3
3
7
7















1CO,OCO 100










23' 1.7 agd 100
23 -1.7 sod 100
24 1.7 sgd ICO
23 1.7 rand 100
23 1.7 a^d 100
23 1.7 and 100
23 1.7 aga 100








                                                                Page 2

-------
FHCILITY N
SROMHWTER USflGE IN fl 5 MILE RADIUS OF INJ.WELL




           WELL MJ.            NO.            * GF PUWW I OF PRWM 6  U USE   *  Public  POP
Rollins Environmental Services of Lfl, Inc
Rubicon Chemical Inc.


Shell Chemical Company

Shell Oil Coaoany, East site






Shell Oil Coaoany, West site




Stauffer Cheaical Coiaoany


TENNECO OIL CCHPW


Texaco Inc.




Umroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


w'itco Cheaical Coroorat ion, Sretna
Wit co Chefflical Corooration, Hahnville

Wyandotte Cheaical Corporation
BflSF Wyandotte


Detroit Coke Coaoany


1
1
2
3
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
3
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3
4
5
A
2
1
6
2
3
1
7
&
5
1
1
2
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
. 11+ 0 11
78
78
78
78
78
14*
14* 0 14 in use
14* 0 14 in use
14 0 14 in use
14 0 14 in use
14* 0 14 in use

14* 0 14 in use
14* 0 14 in use
" 14* 0 14 in use
14* 0 14 in use
14* 0 14 in use
33
33
33

15
15
38
38
38
38
38
*
78
78
10
10
10
16 co. reported 0
16
16


none none none none
none none none none
7
7
7
                                         Page 3

-------
State
FflCILITY Nff€
SROUNIHWTE3  USfi6£  IN A 5 MILE RflOlUS CF INJ.WELL




           i£LL  SO.            NO.             *  OF  PIWW f Or PRWH S H USE
Puohc  PC
Don Chen. Co.



E.I. Oiacont,Xontacue
Ford Motor Co., Rouge Steel

Hoskins Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis i Co.


The Upjohn Co.
Total Petroleua Inc.*

Veisicoi Chea. Core.
*S Filtrol Corp.
NC HERCCFINft



CH flneo Steel Coro.

Calhio Chesical Inc.*

Cheaical Waste ^ananeasnt, Inc.




Schio Cheaical Coaoany, VistTOn


United States Steel Corporation

GK flgrico Chea. co.
fiasrican Airlines Inc.

Cheaical Resources Inc.
Kaiser

Rockwell International
5
2
4
8
l
D-l
D-2
1
2
1
3
2
I
2
2
1
OB 5 (150 0 (150
IS (150 0 (150
17 fl (150 0 (150
CB 4 (150 0 (150
1
2
1
2
5
2
3
5
Ifl
1
2
3
1
2*
1
24 . 4
1 4 4
1 3*
1 6
2 6
1 4 0
                                                             Pace 4

-------
                                   SRCUND-HflTER USflSE IN A 5 «L£ RflDIUS DF INJ.WELL

                rhCiLIVY rtft£                 IZLL K3.             NC.             > GF FU** * CF  PRWH  G U USE  X Public   POP
Soaex                                         1

Haranerflill Paper Co.                           3
                                              2
                                              1

ftnoco Oil Co.                                  5



flrco Oie». CD., Lyondale plant


Badische Corp. (Dow Badischa Co.)

Browning - Ferris Industries
Celanese Chemical Co.



Celanese Chemical Co. , Clear Lake plant

Chaaolin, Sdltex i ICI, Corpus Christi

Chanarral Disposal Co. (BFD*
Cheaical Waste Nanageaent
CHEMC3L WflSTE ,«flNflGB€NT, INC

Coainco American Inc.
Disposal Systems, Inc.
E. I. DutxmtjEeauaount

E. I. Dupont, Houston plant


E. I. Dupont, Inglesids


E. I. Dupont, Sabins River works






3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
Petro 2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
3
7
&
RDN3
5
138
138
138
142
142
•142
182
182

53
53
53
53
132
132
37
37
126
17
)=8


155
26
26
151
151
151
81
81
81
150
150
150

150
150
150
                                                                                 24        114
                                                                                 24        114
                                                                                 24        114
                                                                                 2         140
                                                                                 2         140
                                                                                 2         140
                                                                                 14        168
                                                                                 14        168

                                                                                 6         47
                                                                                 6         47
                                                                                 6         47
                                                                                 &         47
                                                                                 12        120
                                                                                 12        120
                                                                                           37
                                                                                           37
                                                                                 10        116
                                                                                           17
                                                                                 5         150
                                                                                           26
                                                                                           26
                                                                                 11         140
                                                                                 11         140
                                                                                 11         140
                                                                                 6         75
                                                                                 6         75
                                                                                 6         75
                                                                                 23         127
                                                                                 23         127
                                                                                 23         127

                                                                                 23         127
                                                                                 23         127
                                                                                 23         127
                                                         Pace 5

-------
                                         SRCUflHWTER USfiGS IN fl 5 KILE RftDIUS OF
State
FflCILITY
WELL NO.
NO.
*QFPUWy*OFPRyWSHlJSE

E. I. Dupont, Victoria









Espak, Inc.
Ger«ral ftmhne and Fila Corp.


Gilbraltar Wastewaters, Inc.
^alone Service Co.

tericftes co.
tonsanto Cheaicai Co,, Chccolats Bayou



tonsanto Co.

Phiilire Cheaicai Co.

Potash Co. of Qoerica Division
Shell Cheaical Co.

SONICS INTESNflTICNfiL

Velsicol Cheaical Co.


Vistron Corporation


Waste-nater Inc.
'fiitco Cheaical Co. , Houston

'tlitco Cheaical Co. , fersfial 1

4
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
D-3
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
2
150
35
35
85
35
85
35
35
35
35


110
110
110
113
137
117
143
31
31
31
31
127
127
740 (Co. resorted cniy 4)
73 (co. reported A)

135
135


25
25
26
36
36
36
54
125
126
97
97
23











21
21
21
4
23
3
3
6
S
6
6
13
13
3
3

5
5








2
5
6
d
5
127











39
39
89
109
114
114
140
75
75
75
75
114
114
70
70

130
130 -


26
25
25
36
36
36
52
120
120
92
92
MY    WYCON OOICfiL 03!PfiNY
                                                               Page &

-------
                             SECTION 6
Data on
   "The nature and volume of the waste injected during the one-year
   period immediately preceding the date of the report:"

-------

-------
               NfiTURE  AND VOLIM INJECTED


— » — » r T-->_J it/-, • '                     r~~i   »V\
 rrUil-I i I  NrllC                    hCLl. liU.
                                                         BY CLASS  I  HW «LLS IN 1983

                                                                VU. iDfHt
                HflSTE TYPE
firco fllaska Inc.
Stauffer Cheaical Co.
Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Chesical Corg. , Main olant
Great Lakes Chemical Corp., South plant
fierojet Strategic Propulsion Coaoany
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
SHELL OIL COMPANY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS flND CrEIICflL COR
P.
Kaiser QJusinua J Chemical Co.
Monsanto Ccaoany


flllied Chea. Co.
Cabot Corp.
LTV Steel Cosnany*
Velsicol Corp.
£*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
A
5
1
1



1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
0
3,OW,250 o
not yet injected
36,792,000 i
14,681,408 g
6,645,000 g
734, 436 g
1,330,390 g*
t



53,000,000 g
234,400,000 g*
234,400,000 g*
234,400,000 g*
20,314,740 g*
0 i
60,000,000 g
5,800,000 g*
organic
organic
organics, brine
brine, organic
organics, brine
LP. toxic, corrosive waste
organic, acid
or game, acid
organics, acid
organic, acid
Inorganics
organic, inorganic, brine, acid



acid, brine
process *asts*ater,contaainat£d stormat
er, dilute acid*
orocess wastewater, contaainated storswa
ter, dilute acid*
«
process stastawter. contaainated storswat
er, dilute acid*
acid, organic
acid, silica cospounds
acid, silicon coraoouncis
acids
inorganics
inorqanics
Bethlehea Steel  Cor per at ion, Burn Harbor
Plant

Bethlehea Steel  Corporation, Burn Harbor
Plant

General Electric
                                 2*
                                              4,000,000  g*
organic,inorganic,acids,brirs
Inorganic, Organic,acid,brine,aetai
                                                                     brine,organics
                                        Pane 1

-------
                                      NflTURE flND VOU€  INJECTED BY CLASS I Hi HELLS IN 1383
State
FfiCILITY
WELL NO.
VCL(GflL)
HftSTE TYPE
KS
KY
Lfl

Hoskins "-anufacturing Co.
Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative
Inland Steel Company*

Midwest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigsent Co.

Uniroyal Inc. *
United States Steel Corporation
Sherain yilliaas

Vulcan Materials Co.




E.I. Oucont De Heaours i Co.

Raerican Cyanaaid Co.




flrcadian Corporation*
fit las Processing Co.
BASF Wyandotte Corporation
Bcrden Chesical Co.


Browning-Ferris Industries (CcCuS)
Chevron Chssicai Co.
.
Citgo Petroletia Corp.*



E. I. Duocnt, Lao lace





1
1
INS
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
IN9
3
2
*
3
7
3
0
1
i
2
1
2
3
A
5
1
1
D-l
1
2
3
i
?
•n
1
2
4
3
7
5
5
4
3
2

10,320,000 g
56,&00 g*
33,720 g
88,827,933 g
25,113,000 g*
26,208,000 g
25,208,000 g

6,191,000 3*


103,600,000 g*
141,300,000 g*
151,300,000 g*
85,400,000 5*
3,000,000 g*
23,300,000 g*
5-0,000,000 g*
48,000,000 g*
55,000,000 g*
38,000,000 g*
30,000,000 g«
71,000,000 :*
0 g

5,554,236 s*



35,000,000 g*
17, 766, 500 i*
73,788,300 c*
192,352,500 g*
44,562,800 g*
,

54,500,000 g*

0 g
55,300,000 g*
37,300,000 g*
4,200,000 g+
orgamcs
organic
spent caustic and acidic wastes
Inorganic, brine, acid
Inorganics, acids, brine, watsr
acid, brine, *ater, setal
organic
organic
brine, orgamcs, acid
acid, brine, Hater
aetals, brire
setals, brine
organics, inorganics
orgamcs, inorganics
organics, inorganics
organics, inorganics
organic, inorganic
acid
acid
acid, organic
organic, acid
acic, organic
acid, organic
aciu , organ ic
ac:d
brine, acic, organic
acid
organic, acid
organic, acid
acid, organic
organic, ratals, brire
organics, acid, water
watar, organics, acid
organic, brine, acid
acid, organic, brire


organic, brire
organic, brine
organic, :r:ns
organic, crir^s, inorganics
organic, brine, inorganics
organic. :rins, :ncr:=r::
                                                              Page  2

-------
                            NflTURE ftND VOLUHE INJECTED BY CLASS I HW WELLS  IN  1983

            "'".".eiLITY !^1E                '   1^11. !J.         VGLiSAL)
Ethyl Corp. of Baton Rouge
Georgia-Pacific Corooration
International Minerals and Chemical Corp     1
International  Minerals and Chemical Corp     2
                                     iWSTE TYPE
54,500,000 g est*     brine, organic*
161,000 g             acid,organics
0 g                   organic,acid, brine, inorganic, caustic
5,376,000 g*
                                                          67,941,788  g*
                                                                                organic, acid,
                      oragnic,acid
Monsanto Chenical Ccnpany,Luling plant

NflSS, Sichoud fesesbly Facility*

Rollins Environmental Services of Lfl, Inc
Rubicon Cheaical Inc.


Shell Chemical Ccaoany

Shell Oil Coapany, East site
Shell Oil Ccmoany, West site
Stauffer Cheaical Ccapany
TEWCCO OIL CQSPflNY
Texaco Inc,
Ururoyal Inc.
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
a
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
3
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1




54,000,000 g
60,900,000 g*
68,880,000 g*
35,700,000 g *
Og

50,000,000 g*
85,800,000 g*
82,300,000 g* •
135,400,000 g*
141,400,000 g*
133,800,000 g*

4,200,000 g*
14,500,000 g
74,700,000 g*
31,300,000 g*
86,600,000 g*
13,800,000 gt
0 g*
0 g*
28,000,000 g*
18,000,000 g*
7,588,812 g*
45,074,946 g*
92, 148 g*
59,212,020 g*
43,773,072 g*
171,600,000 g*
55,840,000 g*
36,800,000 g*
organic, acid, brine, herbicides
organic, acid, brine, herbicides
setal,, acid, alkaline
metal,, acid, alkaline
organics, brine, alkaline
organic
organic
organic
organic, brine, acid, heavy .uetais
organic, acid, brine, heavy 'ce*ais
organic
organic
organic
organic
organic
organic
organic
organic, acid
organics, *atsr
orgamcs, watzr
organic, acid
organic, acid
brir.e*
brine*
brine
organic, brine
brine, organic
acid, organic
acid, organic
organic, acid
acid, 5rir,e, organic
acid, organic
organic, acid, brine
organic, acid, brine
organic, acid, brine
                                                    Page 3

-------
                                     NATURE flND VCLU€ INJECTED BY CLASS I HH 1£LLS IN 1983
State
                       rfiCILITY  NWE
    VOUGfiL)
                     TYPE
NC
CH
Universal Oil Products


Witco Cheaical Corporation, Sretna
Witco Chesncal Corporation, Hah nvi lie

Uyandotta Cheaical Corscration
BflSF Hyandotts


Detroit Coke Ccsoany


Dow Chen. Co.



£. I. Duccnt,Sontaqus
Ford fetor Co., Rouge Steel

Kcskins Manufacturing Co.
Parks Davis i Co.



"Tie Uqjofin Co.
Total Petroieua Inc.*

Velsicol Chea. Corp.
F i 1 1 ro 1 Core.
KERCGFINfl
7
&
5
1
1
2
0-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
2
4
8
1
3-1
5-2
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
CB 5

acid, brine, setal, silicon
acid, aetai, brine, siLccn
73, &52, 140 g* organic, brine, acid
36,520,000 g* cetal, acid, organic
76, 35S, COO g* ratal, acid, organic

0
6,400,000 g*
8,370,000 g* brine, orgamcs, aetals
2£, 203, COO g organic
64,433,000 g* organic
46,363, 000 :* organic
orgamcs, Desticicss, brire
organic, pesticicss. ~9*als
orgamcs, pesticides, srine
ornanics, oasticides, brim3
orgamcs, brine
orgamcs
orgamcs
733,000 g* brine, acid, orgamcs, metals
brine, organic, acid
brine, acid, orgamcs
orgamcs, acics, brine
acid. organic, brine
orgamcs, inorganics (acids, brine)
orgamcs, acids*
orgamcs, acids*
brine
130,000,000 g acid liast&watsr and collected r'-cff
94,300,000* CSSftNIC PCIDS,^TSLS,CT;-:ER INORGPNICS
          Sraco Steel Coro.

          Calhio Cheaical Inc. *
                                                       IS


                                                       17 a

                                                       OB 4
94,300,000 &


94,300, COO

94,300, C"
                                                                                         IC3
                                                                                         CRSfiNIC ,^
GREPNIC PCI2S,htflV/ MSTSLS,DTHEH
ICS

acid,brine
acid, brine, *"*a7cr
brine, Eetai
                                                              Paae

-------
                             NfiTURE flND VCLU*E  INJECTED  BY  CLftSS I KM WELLS IN 1383
              FACILITY NfiME
WELL NO,
VQL(BflL)
WfiSTE TYPE
Chemical 'daste Itenagewent, Inc.





Schio Cheaical Ccapany, Vistron


United States Steel Corporation

figrico Chem, co.
taerican flir lines Inc.

Chemical Resources Inc.
Kaiser

Rockwell International
Sosex
Hasaerffiiil Paper Co.


fiaoco Oil Co.




flrco Cheat. CO., Lyondale plant


Badiscne Coro. (Dow Badische Co.)

Brcwriing - Ferris Industries
Celanese Chemical Co.



Calariese Chewical Co. , Clear Lake plant

6
2
3
4
5
1ft
i
2
3
1
2*
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
5 '
A
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
4
i
2
3
1
2
3,545,115 g*
30,300,000 g*
1S,OS2,&15 g*
18,575,830 3*
26,789,&35 :*
15, 016, HO g*
64,600,000 g
64,600,000 g
64, £00, 000 g
19, 57". XX) g*
38, 7 ' i, 000 g*
266,361,720 g*


18, 000, '000 g
46,700,000 a*
48,700,000 g*
18,000,000 g*






182,760,000 g*
477,600 g*
2,613,000 g*

36,134,720 g*
76,073,450 g*
0 g
38,800.000 g*





143,000,00 g*
Og
Varies
varies
varies
varies
varies
varies
organically bound cyanide groups
organically bour.d cyanide groups
organically bound cyance crcucs
organics, brine
organics, brins
metals, acid
Metals, Inorganic
cyanide, ratals, solvents
acid, brine, sesticides, o^ganics
acid. Srine, metals
acid, brine, setals
alkai ire, acid, organics
aietals, minerals
suloing liauor
Q'jbing iicuid
pupling hauior


organic, brir.e, scent caustic
organic, sour *ater,sper,t caustic
brine, organic, sour *ater, scent caustics
organic
•srcarnc
organic
Aqueous, organic
aouecus. organic

organic, acid
acid, organic
organic, acid
organic, acid
organic, acid, sstals
organic, acid. "etals
Chasiolin, Soltex  i  ICI, Corpus  Christi
Petro
             15,50-0,000 g*
                  organic, caustic
                                                     Page 5

-------
State
               NflTURE flW) VOLUS INJECTED BY CLASS I HW WELLS IN 1983

FACILITY NWS                   WELL NO.         VCKSAL)
               WflSTE TYPE
Chasolin, Soltex I ICI, Corpus Christ:
Petro
Giaoarral Disocsal Co, (S7!)*
Cheaical Uaste Management
CMEMICflL WflSTE *SNfiGE''ENT, INC

Coainco ftaerican Inc.
Qiscosal Systems, Inc.
E. I. Duoont, Beauaount

E. I. Duoont, Houston plant


L I. Duoont, Ingleside


E. I. Ducont, Sabine River warns







L I. Duoont, Victoria









1

1
t
A
1
2
1
1
2
1
i
2
3
3
1
2
9
10
a
7
6
flDN3
5
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
- 10
1
1,907,340 3*

2, SCO, 000 g*



25, 000, 000*
12,300,000 3*
106,200,000 g*
122,SOO, CCO g*
33,380,000 g*
23, 710, '000 3*

3,431,840 g*

0 g*

new well
100,000 5*

3,i5S,C
-------
                            NATURE WD VOLUffi  INJECTED BY CLflSS I HH WELLS IN 1983




             FACILITY •«&£.                  mi,'NO.         VGL(SAL)
i«S7c TYPE


Gilbraltar Hast waters, IRC.
Malone Service Co.

Merichen co.
flonsanto Chemical Co. , Chocolate Bayou



tonsanto Co.

Phillies Cheaical Co.

Potash Co. of Paterica Division
Shell Chemical Co.

SGNICS INTERNflTIGNfiL

Velsicol Cheaical Co.


Vistron Corooration


Waste-water Inc.
Uitco Cheaical Co. , Houston

Witco Cheaical Co. ,Xarsfiall
*
2
3
1
1
1
0
u
1
4*
3
1
2
1
2
D-2
D-3
1
1
2
1
2
o
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
3
2
Og
70,530,00 g*
44,430,720 g
53,754,240 g

81,707,300 g*
0 g*
12,700,000 g*
500,000 g*
376,100,000 n*
52,200,000 g*
341,668,000 g*
9,000,000 g*
24,000,000 g*
151,075 g*
23,000,000 g*
57,000,000 g*





26,203,000 g


51,840,000 g



5,765,760 g
organic, inorganic
organic, inorganic
Corrosive, acid, rsetals, organic
acid, brine
organic
brine, organic
organic
organic
organic, Dnne,acid
organic
organic
organic
drire
brir*
acid
organic, brine
organic, water, brine


Organic
organic, ratals, acid,
organic, metals, acid
organic, brine
organic, brine
organic
organic, brine, acid
acid, organic, brine
organic, acid
acid,
acid, organic'
WYCOM Ch£i*ICPL COMPANY
                                                   Paqe 7

-------

-------
Data on
                             SECTION 7
   "The dates and nature of the inspection of the injection well
   conducted by independent third parties or agents of State,
   Federal,  or local government;"

-------

-------
                DflTE flND NflTUiS OF INSPECTIONS OF CLflSS I  HM WELLS



FACILITY :«)•£                  '*ai NG.   INSP.MTE          Type
Agency
Frea
Prco ftlaska Inc.
Stauffer Chemical Co,


Ethyl Cora.
Great Lakes Cheaical Cora, Main olant
Great Lakes Chemical Corp., South plant


Aerojet Strategic Prcouision Ccaoany
Rio Bravo Disposal facility
SHELL OIL COMPflNY
U.S. CORP. OF ENGINEERS PND CHS* I CO. CORP.
Kaiser flluainuia J Cheaical Co.
t*onsanto Conpany


fllhed Dies, Co.
Cabo: Corp.

LTV Steel Coaoany*
Velaicol Corp.

Bethlehea Steel Corporation, Burn Harbor Plant

General Electric

Hoskins Manufacturing Co,
Indiana Farm Bureau Coooerative
Inland Steel Coapany*

Midxest Steel
Pfizer Mineral and Pigment Co.

Uni royal Inc. *
United States Steel Corwration
Sherwin Uilliaos
2*
1*
3
1
£
1
^
3X
4
5
1
1


1
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2*
1*
o
1
1
INS
2
1
1*
1*
2*
1
INS
3


33/07/00
83/07/00
83/03/26
B3/09/26
83/09/26
83/09/25
83/09/26
83/07/13
85/01/12


84/09/14
33/07/00
33/07/00
83/07/CO
83/08/17
33/06/23
33/05/23
33/01/24



81/07/07
83/09/23
83/09/23

80/12704
85/05/17
83/06/07
83/06/22

81/05/20
81/04/30
75/00/00



scheduled
scheduled
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
scheduled
sencd-ic


scheduled
periodic
uerioCic
periodic
cenodic
schedule
schedule
periodic
periodic
periodic

periodic
oeriodic
periodic

periodic
schedule
periodic
routine

schecula

periodic
scheduled


state
state
state
state
state
state
state
CCC3
EPfl


state
BER
DER
DE3
n,m
E?H
E^
state
state
state

state
state
state

state
E?Q
NPDES;HC/<;
state

EPfl
state
state
state


annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual



annual
monthly report
monthly resorts
.Tcrthly recortsd
Dt^er
annual
annual
otner
other


othe-
ct-ei-
otner

otner

H :eriodic
other


annual
annual
Quarterly
                                     Pace 1

-------
State
FflCILITY NWE
                                       DflTE WD NftTUSE GF INSPECT !CNS OF CLPS3 I h« '48.13
NO.    INSP. MTc
Scency
                                                                                                                      rr-eq

Vulcan Materials Co.




KY £. I. Duoont Ce Neucurs i Co.

Lfl ftnerican Cyanaaid 'Co.




Prcadian Corooration*
fit las Processing Co.
BftSF Wyandotte Corporation
Borden Chetncal Co.


Srowmnn-ferris Industries (CcCGS)
Chevron Cheaicai -Co.

Citgo Petroleua Ccro. *


L 1. Ducont, Lap lace






Ethyl Core, of Baton Souce
Georgia- Pacific Ccrxration
International Minerals and Cheaical Coro.

Scnsanto Die^icai Cwioany, Luling slant

NflSfl, ^icrcud flssssoly Facility*

Rollins Enviroraental Services of LA, Inc
Suaicon Chetaical Inc.

2
4
3
7
3
9
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
&-1
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
7
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2

34/04/00
34/04/20
54/04/00
34/04/00
34/04/00


33/09/13
33/09/13
83/09/13
32/09/13
33/09/13
Nfl

34/05/00
33/06/14
33/06/14
33/06/14
84/06/14
34/04/10
34/04/10
84/03/16
34/03/1S

34/05/15
34/05/15
34/05/16
SV05/16
34/03/ls
34/05/1S
84/05/12
84/05/22
34/05/04
34/03/27
34/03/27
32/04/12
33/04/12
33/09/09'
33/03/09
£5/01/03
34/03/20
34/03/20
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled

scheduled

periodic
oericdic
ssricdic
periodic
:eriodic
c€riodic
:ericdic
NS
jericdic
cer:odic

cerioCic
cericdic
periodic
:-sr:ixiic
^riocic
periodic
ceriodic

Dsriccic
cericdic
:sriccic
periodic
wricdic
ceriodic
periodic
5cSi-3/mual
jencdic
sen oa ic
seriodic
r-eriocic
anodic
renodic
^riociic
scneauiw, periodi
anodic
sriociic
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
E?fl
state
stats
state, EP3
5tat2
state
state
state

state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
stats
state
: state
state
state
cuarterly
cuarterly
Quarterly
c.uartsriy
cuarterly
cuarteriy
quarterly
cuarterly
SBffli-ann
se* i -ann
SMi-ann
sen i -ann
se^i-ann
sea: -ann
sent i -am
^pw ^ •~3'^T1

cgoj j — jnn
se-ai-arn
s£3i-arn
ss^l-ann
SOT i -ann
setu-arn
seiii-arr

seal -amu
zsf -ann
55^1 -jrn
se- -a-n
55^ -ann
sei iriua
sen -ar:n
se?: -srr
^8^ —ann
se" -ann
sen -ann
SOT -am
sein-ar;n
sei -arn
sesii-ann
Quarterly
sani-ann
se^i-arn
                                                             Page 2

-------
DflTE ftND NflTURE OF INSPECTIONS OF CLflSS ! HW WELLS
                                              Type
  flgency
      Freq

Shell Chesical Coaoany

Shell Oil Ccaoany, East site






Shell Oil Cosioany, West site




Stauffer Chetsical Ccaoany


TENNECQ OIL CGWPfiNY


Texaco Inc.




Umroyal Inc.


Universal Oil Products


Witco Chemical Corooration, Gretna
Witco Chesiical Corooration, Hahnville

yyandotte Chesical Corporation
BASF Wyandotte


Detroit Coka Ccacany


Co* Cheat. Co.

3
4
5
4
5
&
7
a
9
2
&
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
0
3
4
5
4
2
1
&
2
3
1
7
5
5
1
i
2
D-2
1
•5
3
1
2
3
5
2
84/03/20
84/06/29
83/07/06
84/06/15
84/08/15
84/08/15
84/08/15
64/08/15
84/08/15

84/08/15
84/08/15
84/08/15
84/08/15
64/06/15
34/04/17

84/04/17

83/09/22
S3/OS/31
84/05/02
84/05/02
84/05/02
64/05/02
83/12/09
83/07/12
33/07/12
83/07/12

33/01/26
33/01/25
33/09/14
33/10/26
33/10/26


33/00/00
33/00/00
73/06/00

79/06/23


oeriodic
periodic
periodic
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled
screduled
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled
scheduled
Quarterly
quarterly
quarterly

periodic
oeriodic
oerioaic
periodic
Deriodic
periodic
periodic
periodic
oeriooic
oericaic
periodic
oeriodic
periodic
oeriodic
periodic
periodic


annual
annual
schedule



periodic
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state

state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state


state
state




state
seni-ann
seni-arm
sasi-anr
twice/year
twice/year
twic/year
twice/year
txica/year
se'u-ar.n
twice/year
sem-ar.n
twic/year
txics/year
sesi-sr.n
semi-arm
quart sriy
Quarterly
Quarterly

sesii-ara
sesi-arn
semi-arm
sesi-arn
semi-arm
5621 -a nn
sani-arm
sen -arm
se-::-ar;ri
sesiu-ar.n
seui-ann
seni-arn
seT.-arri
san-arn
se^i-ann
se^i-ann


ether
quarterly
tncnthly

•nonthly

quarterly
                                       scheduled
state
quarterly
                      Page 3

-------
                                        DflTE «D NflTURE Cf INSPECTIONS OF CLASS I Brf *ELL3
State
*S
NC
                        FACILITY MRS
        E.I.  Duoont.Fontaque
        Ford totcr Co.,  Rouge Steel

        4oskins Manufacturing Co.
        Parks Davis 4 Co.
        The Uojchn Co.
        Total Petroleus Inc.*

        Vs-lsicol Chea.  Coro.

        Filtrol Ccro.
GH      (Vsco Steel Cora.

        Calhio Cheaical Inc. *

        Chesical '4aste ^anacesent, Inc.
        Sohio Cheaical CcaoaTW, Vistron
        United States Steel Corooraticn
CK      flgrico CJiesi. co,
        fiaencan flirhnes Inc.

        Chemical Rssourcss Inc.
        Kaiser

        Socxweil Interratior.al
        Scsex
                   Pacer Co.
1€LL NO.
                                                        1
                                                        D-l
                                                        D-2
1
2
2

1
03 5
IS
17 A
CB 4
                                                        2
                                                        S
                                                        2
                                                        3
                                                        4
                                                        5
                                                        Ifl
                                                        1
                                                        2
                                                        3
                                                        1
                                                        2*

                                                        1
                                                        2
INSP. DflTE










33/04/00
34/03/CO


81/12/00

83/12/00
34/07/00
34/12/00
84/02/00
84/07/00
SV06/90
83/04/CO
33/04/00
83/04/00
34/06/27
84/06/27
33/04/15
54/05/02
94/12/12

34/03/15
54/04/12
S3/06/19
Tycg
periodic
periodic
periodic
periodic
periodic
oeriodic
periodic
oericdic
periodic
xrioflic
scheduled

periodic
oeriodic
oericflic
ceriodic
Dcricoic
sericcic
periodic
Dsncdic
panodic
periodic
schedule
schedule
sciieduie
csrioaic
periodic
screduls
sen souls
schMuiec
schedule
schscuie
arnual
schedule
flgercy
state


state
state
state
state
state
state
stats
state
.
state
state
state
stats
3H, EPS
CH, £=Q
GH,E7fl
3'r, E?q
CH, E?q
«*j . -*-«•«
'jn o-H
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
stats
OSDH
state
-req
Quarterly
sranthly ?
quarterly
suarterly
other
Quarterly
quarterly
quarterly
Quarterly
quarterly
t^ice/yesr

otr-sr
other
o:ner
other
annual
arsnuai
arinuai
anrual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
;nnual
annual
annual
annual
annual
arnucl
annual
annual
                                                               Pane  4

-------
NW%
                                DflTE flNO NATURE OF INSPECTIONS OF CLfiSS I HH WELLS

                                                *ELL NO.   INSP. DflTE          Tyoe
ftgency
req
Amoco Oil Co.
flrco Chem. CO., Lyondale plant
Badische Corn. (Dow Badische Co,)

Browning - Ferris Industries
Celanese Chemical Co.
Celanese Chemical Co. , Clear Lake plant

      in, Soltex  i  ICI, Coraus Christ: Petro
Chaparral Disocsal Co. (BFD*
Chemical Waste Management
CKD1ICP1 WflSTE «flflGS€NT, INC

Comnco American IDC.
Disoosal Systems, Inc.
E. I. DuoontjEeauKount

E. I. Duoont, Houston 3! ant
L. I. Ducont, Ingleside
E. I. Dupont,Sabine River
                       2
                       1

                       5
                       4
                       3
                       2
                       1
                       3
                       2
                       1
                       2
                       1
                       1
                       4
                       1
                       2
                       3
                       1
                       2
                       2
                       <
                       1
                       1
                       1
                       1
                       I
                       2
                       1
                       1
                       2
                       3
                       3
                       1
                       2
                       Q
                       10
                       a
                       7
                       6
E. I. Dupont, Victoria
84/02/15
34/02/15
34/02/15

S4/03/13
84/03/13
84/04/00
84/04/00
84/02/13
84/02/13
34/02/13
84/02/13
34/03/15
84/03/15
84/00/00
84/00/00
84/05/00

85/01/00
34/03/14
83/05/04
83/05/04
84/03/15
S4/03/15
84/03/15
83/12/28

83/12/28


83/09/cl
83/09/21
83/OS/21
83/09/21
83/09/21
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
annual
schedule
schedule
schedule

schedule
=ctiedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
periodic
schedule
REElJLflR
schedule
schedule
scnodule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
schedule
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state
state UIC
stats 'JIG
state
stats

state 7D*R
state
state, nWR
state
state
state
state
stats
state
stats
state
state
state
state
state
state
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
arnual
annual
arnual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
ar.'-'-a!
annual
annual
SUfiTERLY
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
                                                      Page 5

-------
Stats
FfiCILITY
                                        M7E SND  NflTURE  GF  INSPECTIONS  3F  CLASS  I  HW  UtLLS
*ELL NO.    INSP.DflTE
Agency
Freq



Esoak, Inc.
General finihne and Fila Corp.


Gilbraitar Wast abaters, Inc.
."alone Service Co.

fericnea co.
^onsanto Chemical Co., Chccoute Eayou

.

Monsanto Co.

Shiilios Chemical 'Co.

Potash Co. of Hsenca Di/ision
Siell Chesncai Co.

SCNICS INTER?£T!CNftl

Velsicol Cheaical Co.


Vistrcn Corcoration


'<4aste-*ater Inc.
*iteo Chemical Co. , Houston

yitco Clerical Co. , Mars-nail

4
5
6
7
3
9
10
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
4*
3
1
£
1
0
D-2
D-3
1
1
2

2
2
1
3
i
3
u
3
1
2
1
3
2


34/04/25
84/03/14
34/03/09
34/03/09
33/10/24
32/11/02
33/02/14

85/02/00

33/02/15
83/02/16
33/C5/15
34/02/00
33/02/16
83/10/00
33/10/00
34/01/12
34/03/13
34/03/13



33/02/03
83/02/03
32/03/17
83/05/25
33/05/25
33/04/2S
-34/03/12
34/03/12
33/11/16
33/11/15


coaphance
ceriodic
scneduie
schedule
scnedule

scneduje
schedule
sen ecu le


scried. J Der

schedule
^er:c<1ic
schedule
scnedula
scheouled
scnedula
5£tiort>M o



scnedule
scnecule
scneauie
scr.efluie
scnMuie
schedule
schedule
scr.Kule
schedule
scnecuie


TDWR
'njyR
state
state
state
state
state
state
state

state
state
state
stats
state
state ~~*R
state T*R
TrtR (state)
state
state


-
stats
state
state
state
5 vat e
state
state
state
state
state


2/year
annual
annual
annual
annual

annual
annual
annual

annual
annual

annual
annual
yearly
anr.ua 1
annual
annual
annual



a-inual
annual
annual
arnual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
annual
                                                              Page 6

-------
                             SECTION 8
Data on
   "The name and address of all owners and operators of the well
   and any disposal facility associated with it;"

-------

-------
                                            NflHE flND ADDRESS Of CLASS  I h'W WELLS
te
FACILITY
                  Address
CITY
Arco Alaska Inc.

Stauffer Chemical Co.


Ethyl Corp.
Great Lakes Cheraical Corp., fein plant
Great Lakes Cheaical Corp., South plant


Aerojet Strategic Prooulsion Ccsoany
Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
P.O. box 100360
P.O. box 100360
P.O. box 32
P.O. box 32
0.0. box 32
P.O. box 729
P.O. box 1958
Route 2, Box 162-X
toute 2, box 162-X
route 2, sex 162-x
P.O. Box 15699C
P.O. box 53S8
Archorage
Anchorage
Cold Creek
Cold Creek
Cold Creek
Magnolia
El Dorado
El Doraco
El Dorado
El Dorado
Saeraroento
Bakersfieid
99510
S9510
36512
36512
36512
71753
71730
71730
71730
71730
75813
93388
      SHELL 01'- CQPWY
      U.S.  CORP.  OF ENSINEERS flND CHEMICAL CORP.

      Kaiser Aluannua i Chemical Co.
      Monsanto Ccspany
      Allied Chem.  Co,
      Cabot  Corn.

      LTV  Steel  Cciscany*
      Velsicol  Corp.
      Bethlehesi Steel  Corporation, Burn Harbor Plant

      Serieral  Electric

      Hoskins  fenufacturing  Co.
      Indiana  Faras  Bureau  Coonerative
      Inland Steel  Coapany*

      Midwest  Steel
      Pfizsr Mineral ar
-------
                                                    WD flDDRHSS CF CLASS I  KU ffllS
State
                         FflCILITY
                 Wdress
     :ITY
KY
Lfl
         Vulcan Satsnals Co.
         E. I.  Duoont Ce tesours i Co.
         fteerican Cyanaaid Co.
         Orcadian Ccrooratiort*
         Atlas Processing Co.
         BfiSF yyandotte Corporation
         Bordsn Cheaical Co.
         Browning-Ferris Industries (C3CCS)
         Chevron Chssucal Co.

         Citqo Petroleu* Core.*
         E.  I.  Duoont,Laalace
         Ethyl Coro.  of Baton Rouge
         Georgia-pacific 'Corporation
         International Minerals and Cheaicai 'Cora.

         Sonsanto Chesicai Coocany, Luhng oiant

         WSP, *icncud Pssanoiy Facility*

         Rollins Environmental Services of Lfi, Inc
         Rubicon Cheaicai Inc.
p.o.  box 355
p.o.  box 12283
o.o.  box 12233
o.o.  oox 12283
0.0,  box 122S3
o.o.  box 12283

p.o.  box 1378
p.o,  box 1373

10SOO River Rd.
1CSOO River road
lOoOO  River Road
ICSCO River Road
10800 River Road
D. o,  box 207
3333 ,1iCxay Ave.
o.o,  box 457
o.o.  box 427
o.o.  box 427
P.O.  box 4P7
p.o.  box 5416
p.o.  box 70
P.O.  box 70
3. o.  box 1552
o.o.  box 1562
P.O.  Box 1562
P.O.  box 15S2
p.o.  box 2CCO
0.0.  box 2000
p.o.  box 2000
p.o.  'oox 2000
0,0.  box 2000
0.0.  box 2000
o.o,  DOX 2000
O.o.  box 341
p.o.  'oox 52S
p.o,  box 525
p. o.  'box 525
3.0.  box 174
D.O.  box 174
p.o.  box 2S3M
3.0.  box 2S3CO
Route 2, box 1200
o.o,  box 517
p.o.  box 517
                                                                                                        Coffeyville
                                                                                                        Uicftita
                                                                                                        Wicnua
Wichita
Wichita

Louisville
Louisville

Westxeao
ifestweco
»est wee Q
                                                                                                        beistear
                                                                                                        S^revecort
                                                                                                        Seismar
                                                                                                        Seisaar

                                                                                                        Geissiar
                                                                                                        Lake Charles
                                                                                                        Seile ChassH
                                                                                                        Bella Chasse
                                                                                                        _ake Charles
                                                                                                        Lake Charles
                                                                                                        Lake Charles
                                                                                                        Lake Charles
                                                                                                        Laplace
                                                                                                        Laolaca
                                                                                                        Lac lace

                                                                                                        Lac lace
                                                                                                        Laolaca
                                                                                                        Lao lacs
                                                                                                        Saton Rouce
                                                                                                        Sterhrgtcn
                                                                                                        Sfcsrhnctcn
                                                                                                        Luhnc
                                                                                                        Lulirg
                                                                                                        S's^ '-iT* s^ns
                                                                                                        Xe* Crleans
                                                                                                        Plaauesire
                                                                                                        Seisaar
                                                                                                        3eissar
                                                              Page 2

-------
AND flDDRESS OF CLASS  I HW  WELLS
                       Qddress
rr-ry
wi ' I
Zip

Shell Chemical Cosioany

Shell Oil Ccapany, East site






Shell Oil Conoany, West site




Stauffer Cheaical Ccap-any


TEtfcCO OIL CCHPCNY


Texaco Inc.




Itoiroyal Ire.


Universal Oil Products


Hitco Chesucal Corcoration,Gr«tr,a
Mitco Chemical Corccraticn, Hahnville

vJyandotte Chemical Corporation
BASF tyandotto


Detroit COKS CoEcany


Do* Chei. Co.


3.0. box 517
p.o. box 500
o.o. box 500
p, o. box 10
o.o. box 10
D.O, box 10
P.O. box 10
o.o, box 10
p,o. box 10
o.o. box 10
p.o. box 10
p.o, box 10
p. o. box 10
p.o. box 10
o. o. box 10
p.o, "box E6
p.o. box 86
P.O. Box 86
PO BOX 1007
p.o. box 1007
p, o, box 1007
p.o, box 37
p.o. box 37
p.o. box 37
p. o. box 37
P.O. box 37
p. o. box 397
D.o, box 397
p.o. box 2S7
p.o, box 21555
p. o. box 215£6
p.o. box 21E66
3.0. box 30-3
o.o. box 310
p.o. box 310
P.O.BOX 457
431 Coln'abia five.
431 Colujiou Qve.
491 Coluabia five.
7817 West Jefferson
7317 West Jefferscn
7817 iJ. Jefferson
403 Buildirg
409 Building
403 Building
Seiswar
Geisraar
Geissar
Morco
Vorco
Norco
,Norco
Norco
Norco
Norco
Norco
torco
Norco
Norco
torco
St. Saoriel
St. Sabnel
St. Sabnel
CHflUTTTc
Chalsette
Chalcette
Convent
Convert
Convent
Conver.t
Convent
Seisetar
Seismar
Seisavar
" Shreveport
Sfirevecort
Shrevecort
Sretna
Hahnviile
Hahnville
SEISJ'ER
Hollar
Holland
Holland
C'etrcit
Detroit
Detroit
•"idland
Xidlano
Midland
70734
70734
70734
7C079
70079
70079
70079
70079
70079
7C079
70079
- 70079
70079
7C079
70079
70776
7C77&
70776
70044
7CO-H
70044
70723
70723
70723
70723
70723
70734
7C724
70734
71120
71120
71120
70054
70057
70057
70734
49423
4S423
45423
4S£09
46209

436^0
4-5S40
43640
          Pace  3

-------
                                      NfifE fiND ADDiSSS  OF  CLASS
                                                                               WELLS
state
                FACILITY SfiXc
                                                    CITY

LI. DusonVorrtague
Ford "^otcr Co. , Rouge Steel

Hosk-.r.s Manufacturing Co.
Parke Davis J Co.



*he L'ojchn Co.
Total Fetroleua Inc.*

Velsicol Chen. Coro.
409 Building
p.o. box 43437
3001 Miller 3d.
3001 filler Soaa
o.o. box 1273
132 'Coward five.
182 Howard HVS.
183 Howard 3ve.
1SS Howard Sve.
7171 Cortaga
East Sucerior St.
East Suoenor St.
SCO Sankson St.
Midi arc
Jtontague
Dearborn
Dearbcr"'
^0
Hollars
,-o llano
'^clland
Holland
Kalasazoc
fllaa
fllaa
St. Louis
46640
43437
43121
48121
43647
43423
43423
43423
43423
4SC01
46S01
48801
4S3SO
Filtroi Core.
HEHCCFINA
p.o.  cox 3337
PO BOX 327
3.0.  BOX 327C-W 321N)
P.O.BOX 327(WJY 421 N)
PCBCX 327
                                                                                                         Jackson
                                                                                                         «IL)!IN3TGN
CH       ATKO Steel Coro.
         Caimo Cheaicai Ire. *
         Chesncal Waste y
         Scr.io Chesicai Cosicany, v'isvrcn
         Lmtec States Steel Corcoratio^
         flgr:co •C^ei'. co.
         fiaerican Airlines  Ire.
          aisar
         •?cckw5ii  Irit er r»a:icr a 1
p.o.
0.0.
p.o.
p. o.
3S^6
33f6
3S36
3S;o
35S6
3336
3.0.
3. 0.
D.O.
3.0.
3. 0.
3.0.
3300
B.C.
3.0.
3.0.
1 ^
3.0.
box SCO
MX £00
box 56
State icute 412
State icute 412
Sta:s .^cute 412
State 'oute 412
State Route 4i2
Stats Rcuts 412
box £23
box £23
box £23
box 127
box 127
box 455
North ^ingo 3d.
box 5 ICC 3
box 246
box 246
box 51303
cox 1216
Siddietofn
"iddleton
P^rry
Perry
Vickery
Vickery
Vicksry
Vicxery
Vickery
Vickery
Lisa
-_:sia
Lina
Ircr.ton
Irontcn
'Catoosa
"ul?a
~ JiS-3
Pryor
-ryor
Tulsa
Bart lesvi lie
                                                           3.0.  Box 1440,  East Lake -d

-------
                                        NfiK fiND  RDDRESS Cf CLflSS I HW WELLS
                                                                                                        CITY
Zip
 Prco Cheat.  CO,,  Lyondale  plant
3adi5crie Ccro.(Dox B^dische  Co,

Browning - Ferris Industries
Celarese Chemical Co,
Cslar/ese Chemical Co, , Clear Lake  plant

Charalin,  Soltex ' J  ICI, Corpus Christ:  Petro

Chasan-al  Disposal Co. ISF!)*
Chesiical waste ^anagesient
i-1j 1«"W T rl/ll 1 l/l^TTf- V~l It I '"* '~1'"'y""V rr  Y 1 V^
u-t:1iL,^_ *-S';  -Nricc'IcNi ,  ...I,
Co:3inco Praerican Inc.
D:sDcsal  Eystws,  Ir.-c,
£.  I, DuQcrit,Beausour,t

E.  I. Dupont, Houston slant


L  I. DuDont, Inglssice


£,  !. Du"on;,3abine River works
E. I, Dupont,Victoria


p.o. box 401
o.o. box 401
3.0. box Wl
p. o. box 401
o.o. box 401
3.0. MX 777
p.o. box 777
2. o. box 777
602 Co peer read
502 Cooper Rd,
1020 Holccsce Blvd.
p.o. box 50S
p.o, box 503 "
B.O. x>x !iC3
o.o. box 5CS
p.o. box 53190
p.o. box 5S1SO
p,o. box 10340
p.o. box 1CS40
D. o. box 6503
p.o. box 52S5
PO EOX S63
?Q 3CX £553
D.O. tXJX 1503
D. o. Box 3253
3. o, box 3253
3. o. box 2-4?
p. o. Dox 347
D. o. box 347
p. o. box JJ
3.0. box JJ
p. o. box JJ
P. 0. Box 1C63
D.o. box 1033
P.O. box 1033
p,o. box 1083
p.o. box 1083
p.o, box 1CS3
P.O. box 1083
p. o. box 1083
D.o. box £ScS
p, o. oox 2S2S
Haramermiil
Haamersnll
''sxas City
Taxas City
"Texas City
Texas City
Texas City
ChanelviBN
Chanreiview
Channel view
Free port
Frseport
Houston
Bay city
Bay City
Bay City
Bay City
Houston
Houston
Corpus Chrisbi
Corpus Christi
Idesaa
Corpus Christi
S03T ARTHUR
PGRT PRT^US
WJStOP
Seauffiourit
Beauracunt
La 2orte
La >>rte
La Porte
l^clsside
Ingleside
Ingle-sice
Cranes
Grange
Crange
Orange
Grange
Orange
Cranns
Crange
Victoria
Victoria


77530
77530
775SO
77590
77530
77520
77530
77530
77541*
77541
77030
77414
77414
77414
77414
77S8*
77 c^5*
73410*
1S410J
73750
72417
77£tO
77640
7752E,
77704
77704
77571
77571
^757 1
733S2
78362
7S362
77530
77630
77630
77S30
77630
77S30
77520
77630
77302
77SD2
                                                       Pace 5

-------
state
&TW7
r*h?t
Nfl* AND PDDRE53 C? CLASS  I HW 'WELLS

                            Address

         Vaisicol  henxcai  o
          is'ron Corocration
                   r Ire.
         *itco Chsraical  Cc.,rouston
                                                           p.o.
                                                                    2533
                        Routs  4,  box  327
                        p.o, DOX  227
                        o.o. box  327
                        p.o. :ox  659
                        p.o, box  539
                        p. o, DOX 5c3
                        5t07 Danclexccc
                        3220 Srookfisic!
                        3220 Srooxfield
                        P.O. box  1429
                        3.0, 'cox  1*33

Ezcax. Inc.
General Smhr.e and "il.n Cora.


oilbraltar Uastenatars, Inc.
la lone Service Co,

ysriche« cc.
Yonsarto C^enical Co,, Chocolate Bayou



*onsan;o Co,

-hllilPS ;>,2ill
Duaas
Deer
on
C:
Ci
C:.
n
u-.
'wl
on




wl
Ci
1CS
103

*J31"'

ty
ty
ty

-y
*y





iv
J
ty



y
                                                                                                          RfiNGEH
                                                          ceaasor,1:
                                                          >;rt Lavaca
                                                          Port Lavaca
                                                          >;rt uavaca
                                                          3uy
                                                          rouston
                                                          '••oustcn
                                                                                                          ^rsnaii
                                                               Pace &

-------
                             SECTION 9
Data on
   "The identification of all wells at which enforcement actions
   have been initiated under this Act (by reason of well failure,
   operator error,  groundwacer contamination or for other reasons)
   and an identification of the wastes involved in such enforcement
   actions;" and

-------

-------
               UlLI TY  NA.lt
firco Plaska  Inc.
Stauffer Chetsical  Co.
               IN CLPSS  I HW WELLS

                         NONOXPL
                                                                                                            Type
»fcLL Nil.

2*
1*
3         none

1         can't  perfors aecnamcl  i.test  due to cr  to oe abandoned in 84
                                                     nona
Ethyl Core.                                1

Sreat Lakes Chsfljcal Corp., ?1ain plant     2


Great Laxes Chemical Corp., South olant    3X
          annular pr^ss.  le
          ediai act. pending
                                                                       KS !83/OS/cS5 ;r!£Ss res  notice of violation  83/09/25
Aerojet Strategic  Propuisiori  Coaoat.y       1


Rio Bravo Disposal Facility                1



3r£L_ 3IL CCKPfiNY

J.3. CCP?. CF ENGINEERS fiNC C-EMICAL  COR
r\
H.
-'aiser nl'juuinu.i J Conical Co,
Monsanto Ccsioany
Allied uiera. Co.


Cabot Corp,


LTV Steel Ccapany*


Velsicol Corp.
                                                     annul us en vacuua indicated IsaK  (33/OS/  noiice of violation  (33/10/2^)
                                                     25) jfiEcperaing
          no re on record
          THE STflTH WS X43T PvifiSE CF THIS  AGILITY
          INJECTING H!«*
          none*
          none

          scnitoring and reoor* ing (none rsoortsfl o   infernal
          n Questionnaire)

          rone
1         well construction J cperationjSEouL^TICN  notice  of  violation
          :  norxover

1         surface proole*s tied into injection nel  inforrcal
                                                         Pace  1

-------
                                                 SGNCOIPlIfiNCE IN CLASS I HW '«L
State
                    rfiCILITY >ciana  "am Bureau Coocerativ?           IN3
       Inlano Steel Coaoanv*                     2
       1ic*est Stsei
                    l ard ?igssr;t Co,
       u'nircyal Inc.  *.
       o'nitso States Steel Cc-rpcration

       Shernin Millurrs

       '•'alcan Materials Co.
       E. I. Duocnt Ds Neaours £
'•J\     fisencan Cyan^aio Co.
       Orcadian Corporation^
       fit las Processing Co.
       EPS? «yarc:o:t; Cc-roraticn
       Borten uiersirai Co.
       3rowninq-Ferris  Irxiustriss  (CSCC3;
                                                 1*
                                                 1*
                                                 2*
                                                 1
                                                           scnitoring ana reverting
          none
          nons
          Hydrccnlcric soill B2/CA/09
3
2
4
3
7
3
9
1
2
1
0
L.
3
A
5
none
r.ors
none
none
none
rone
rcne
none
ncre
aonitcnng
aonitoring
comtcring











a.'xl rscortinc*
and r?ocrt:ra
ar.d rsocrting


                                                           NP
                                                           rsonitorirc arxl r-s-jcrtins
                                                           monitoring and rswrting
                                                           scnitorinn and report in:
                                                                                                     notice of violation
                                                                                                     rotica of violation
                                                                                                     notics of violation
                                                     ,"
-------
                                                         !N  CLflSS  I  HVJ SHELLS
             FACILITY Nfti';£
Chevron Chemical Co.
                                          .ȣLL NO.
                                                       Type
                                                    982, correct ed)*

                                                    Bomtcring records, incorsisitency in an  notice of rrorcc
                                                    nulus oressure
Citoo Petroleum Corn.*
E. I. Duccnt,Laolace
Etriyl Corp. of Baton ^ouga
Geornia-3acific Corporation
                                                    sonitoring records ; inconsister-cy  in arm  not IB  of
                                                    ulus pressure

                                                    well ocerationjoonitorir-g and reporting*
                                                    non?
                                                     None
                                                    annulus zomtonr.g
                                                    nore
 Interiatio.'-ai linerals ard C^amcai Ccrp   1          sonitoring  and  reporting
                                                                                              none
                                                                                               inforsal  letter
Inlsrratioi'ial  Minerals and Chesiical Corp  2
                                                     Bcnitoring,  rsoorting
                                           infcraai  letter
?orisanto Cheaical Coaoany,Luiing  plant     1
                                           2
NfiSS, Michoud fissenoly Facility*           2
                                           1
 loliiris Envirormer'tal Services of Lfl, Inc   !
 uicon
                  re.
Shell Chesical Ccnpany

Shall Oil Cc-npany, East site
                                          1
                                          Z
                                          I
                                          4
                                          5
                                          4
                                          5
                                          6
                                          7
                                          a
                                                    sonitoring equio. rat installed by 33/04
                                                    723; Resolved
sonitoring and reporting*                 notice of violation
'nonitorirg and reporting                  notice of violation
well operation, Tomtoring sr,c resorting-*  notice of violation
lack of inhibitor fluid in annuius        notice of violation
lacK of inhibitor flaid in annul as        notice of violation
                                                    N/fl
                                                    N/3
                                                    N/fi
                                                        Page 3

-------
Stata
"ACUITY NA*E
'JELL NO.
E IN CLflSS I HW WELLS

             NQNCGM5L.
Type
9
2
Shell 3il Ccflioany, West site 8
I
5
/•
0
3
Stauffer Chetncal Cosoany 2
1
3
"EWEC3 OIL CCSPSNY 7
3
>.
t

"exaco Inc. 5
4
?

1
5
Jni royal Inc. 2
3
N/fl

N/fl
S/Q
N/fl
N/fl
N/a
none
nore
none
USDW CCMTfiMINflTICN, CLEAS 'j? IN PSCCZS5*
Barrier xsts and rrsaxs .n contiuous ira NCV 4 !_CD
Barrier sosts ar<3 breans in contmous TO *CV 4 LCD
ni tor ing
monitoring ara reporting letter of xc.rning
scnitcring 4 rt-crtinc letta- of nwr.q
monitoring 4 -xrtin3;^5olutioniin5tai lett?- o^ ^riirc
la. of rscomer
continuous x:nitoring letter of xarnirc
Tcnuorins art rscortin:* letter if warn i re
none
rrorre
                                                           none
                                                           3cnitor:rg  and  ^ccrting;  ^ssoluf.on;  :e  rotics of v'olat'on
                                                           ocing

                                                           Bcn:tcrirg  arti  i~sccrt:rg;  'esolut:cn:cen  ^tire cf v-.claticn
        itco ^'=^iC2i Ccrooration,Srstna
                                       rso  accarent  I^»;;ncor5-.s"-sr;t  scnitcring   notice of violation  33/09/
                                       =cu listen;*
             tta Chsaical Corporation
                                                            Here
                                                  2          ar.nulus  -  injection cccsiiir.icaticnjrs^oiv  notice of  /;oia::cn
                                                                Pace 4

-------
                                           NCNCOfPLIfiNCE IN CLASS I HW «ELLS
             r_Y"T' TTV  vp
             . r o i w * i I  ! 
-------
State
,-hCILITY N
       Sohio CJienical  Ccfloany,  Vistron
         S IN CLASS I HW WELLS

L NO.                  NGNKWPL.
                                                 5
                                                 Ifl
                                       well  failed aecrtamcal  integrity test
                                       *»ell  failed ^scr.anical  integrity test
                                                                                                     judicial
                                                                                                     judicial
                                       nell  failed Mechanical  intergnty test    judicial
                                       *ell  failsc aecnanical  integrity test

                                       well  sfmt dcwn en 32/ll/10;inj.  press.?
                                       ; resolved.*

                                       ccnti^iration ro^e-: in  several wnitorin
                                       g  sells.

                                       contaairatior ?»tsd in  several sscmtonn
                                       g  welis.
       'Jnitec  States Scee;  Generation
                                                           none
                                                           ecanurucaticr to annul us
                                                                                 Informal
       -werican ,-ariir-es inc.
                                                                                                     surety bcrxj
                                                           rare
                                                           failed  sacnamcal  int=grity test;.^E:Derci   notics or" violation
                                                           ma  32/11/5.
       Chemical  Resources Inc.
                             1         «ell construe.,oceration, ajnitcring ard   jucicial
                                       reoortinn*
       raiser
                                                                     traininc  'e>ccrGs  inccaiolete      ratics
"A     P.30CO
                                                           fractured  confining  :or€*,  fluid  '.sax      jucicial
                                                           fractured  confining  zone*,  fluid  lean      judicial
                                                           fractured  confining  :ons-*,  ,-VJlD  '_£?-<      judicial
                                                                    ^e^aittsa  inj,  ^ats for 6 consa
                                                           cutive aontTii
            Ches,  GG.,  Lyondals giant
                                                           rons
                                                           rcns
                                                               Page S

-------
              FACILITY ™>s
                                    NCNCCMPLIANCE IN CLflSS I HH »ELLS

                                    kdl MJ.
 Badische Cc.-p. (Dow Badische Co.
      ing  -  "erris Industries
Cslanesa Che«ical  Co.
Celanese  Cheaical  Co.,Clear Lake plant
                                                                                                              iype
                                    2         none
                                    1          none

                                    i          THIS w£LL PLLSSED UP,HI3H INJECTION 2RES   I \VESTIGA7IDJ
                                              SURES*
                                    4
                                    i
                                    a
                                    3
                                    1          none
Chataplin,  Soltex   J  ICI,  Corpus Christ:   2         none
n,  Soltex  i ICI, Corpus Christi    1
                                                     none
Cia^arral  Disposal  Co. i?FT)f
Cheaical waste ^tnacesisnt
Coairco fisierican  Ire.
DisDosal Syste-re,  Ire,
E. I. Dupor.t.SeauflC'jnt

E. I. Ducott, Houston  slant
E. I. DuDont,Innl=siC3
E. I. D'jpontjSabins  River
E.  L Dupont,Victoria
1
i
1
2
l
l
2
1
1
2
3
3
i
2
3
10
8
7
6
ADN3
4
2
3
4
5
6
none




none
none
none
none
none
none
none

none


none










-------
Stats
             FflCILITY WE
tjoak,  Inc.
General Ami ins and Fils Ccr^.
       Siibraltar *35te*at2rs. Inc.
       ""alone Servic? Co.
yen so.

7
3
3
10
1
•
1
3
              IN CLASS I KW *ELLS

                         NCNCCMPL.
                                                                                                                    ;ype
       *er:che9 cc.                                1
       '•fcrsanto diKJicai Co., Chocolate Sayou     4*
                                                  3
                                                  i
                                                  2
                                                  1
Monsanto Co.

:hill:as Chsaical Co.


Potash Co.  of Qffisrica Division
       SCMCS INTERNflTICNSL
       Velsicol Chsuical Co.
D-2
3-3
                                                            none
                                                            none
          rore
          exceeded inj. rate in  1S81.
          nor«
          none
          injected rate excsstie-3  ^fll  on  32/11/22.
                                                     *
                                                     none
                                                                                                      administrative
                                                                                                      rxDtice of  violation
                                                            rone
                                                            no re
                                                            calibration of fie* totalizer bicn (rot   infernal
                                                            '0'  xith  no flow)

                                                            nona

                                                     VICL2TICN Cf SH L.MITPTICNS.'.SDW 'CENTS?I
                                                     NflTICN
       Vistron Ccroor=:;cn


       '(«aste-sta:ar  Ire.

       Witco Chsnica!  'Co. ,'-v,uston
                                                               VIGLflTIGN CPL^ED ?•€ CGHRCSICN CF '-cL
                                                               SCW CCNTf^IK"
                                                     out of ccaolianc9 on  injec.  i  annul us  :r
                                                                Pace a

-------
w'ltco Ossical  Co.,Marshall
«YCON Q-iKICPL CCMWNY
                                          JCNCCMPLIftNCE IN CLftSS I M V£LLS




                                          '^£LL NO.                 HCNCO1PL.
Type
                                                   ess. i recording
                                                       Page  3

-------
                                      ADDITIONAL NONCOHPLIflNCc IN CLfiSS I Bi WELLS
                                                                                  ftttacnaent
Rio Bravo Disposal
1. Ordinal  hole  drilled:1938
redrilied:1953
converted  to injection  well:1383
2. Injected  fluid IDS  (cpjn),  pri,  Specific gravity,  acids (ppw),
organics  (ccf),  inorganics  (ppm),  .netals (POBI): rude ranges
3. Reported  annual volume  injected:  operation sines 84/05/01.
4. THE STfiTE  CLI9I*3  priQT THEY DID W 
-------
                                             ftDDITICWH. NONCaPLIftNCE IN CLflSS I HU wLLS
Stats              rPCILITY
       C;tco PetrolsuBi Ccrn. *
                                      «ELL NO.
                                                                                  flttacnwent
3rcwning-Ferris Industries  (CECCS)
                                                X013
                                                                            CN
                                                                                     .13*=   :,3CO
                                                         Lagoon Effluent
                                                         4.  Snnual volume injected: 43,000,000  g  1933;  163, 00,0:0 g !3S

                                                         1.  Date *e!l drille
                                                 .  Date  *e!l  drilled cor.tinued: originally drilled  in  1351.
                                                 . Porsits:      fOfl code 'row G,S.«: LPD CQC6 13238
                                                 CRfl:  applied       Part 3 sue to Ls D.E, 3
                                                34/10/10
                                                                 pplied

                                                         NPCE5: LA OC53S
                                                NHiJts:  LH  'A-dac:
                                                UIC:  aaohed       32/11/00
                                                3.  Annual  voluse injected:     32,057,45* g 33/00/00
                                                38,332,375 g  32/00/00
                                                i.  >tcrces!3 hares ccrtinued: si nor leak on *ell-^ead,  arc incorrect
                                                serial  * on I.D.  sign.   Both oroolecs rssclvec.
                                                 (•ac'iWaste  Coaoonspts:   CC?':CNE:ST3               -c»
                                                r"-i                     , t; -I,YI
                                                wUJ                     . J, '-VV
                                                 iT€
                                                 Inorganics
                                                 steter
                                                                                  5,000
                                                                                  3, 000
                                                                                  3,000
                                                                                ?60,CCO
                                                  steter            %< = ?60,CCO
                                                  5. CC.NTP.^INfiTIGN GF 2 SLH.-^Cc -Gcl^rrt  ST  >E 5I~ aTT^IsiJTS T
                                                  •« , i nr" "*J^f "l 7 '*~n * \ "*, ) E  S'^T";  C-cTE.",XIN'ES «WT 1 3 US
                                                  2jNTfl?!!.WnG.N. (.-^Cl T.^LTO i. VI, V 15/35).

                                                               of :he rcnfir.irg  layer cent i r.'^ec :   7C-2CO ~"t asc
                                                        -  ;€c*
                                                     Sorcofna 1 1 arcs actions ccrtinuec-:
                                                     olution of srfcrceren'; act: en:  rs
                                                 30-20

                                                 "^s
                                                         "^solution of srfcrceren';  act: en:  rs.recial  actiors
                                                         ar;*.ic:eatKi.
                                                         3.  CcflC5r,v r^te: ;reviou5ly  listM as Cities Ser/ics Gil ro.
                                                         ^.  Permits:  RCHQ;     _PO  COSOS0350   Irterm
                                                         N?"E3:    L^  COC53M      active
                                                                      -
                                                                             active
                                                             33-1
                                                                    '.njscte-2:  132
                                                 5.  ^rnual v'i   '.njs
                                                 .33, -03, SCO g 32/00/00
                                                                                            , 50-0 5 cxi/CO/'O
                                                                       T 330-9CO  ^EI
                                                 Suificss

                                                                         -,359
'ibicon C^s^ical  Ir-c.
                                                         1. 'JcnccEcliarcs  actions  ccncifjed:
                                                         Resolution  of  =nfcrc=7ent  actici;  «»ell -orwovs",
                                                         33/03/20.
                                                         2. traits:  RCW:     LAD 003213191      Interior
                                                         NPCE3:   iJ^ OOOS32          orsocs^l

-------
                                     flDDITIONflL NQNCDftPLIfiNCE IN CLPSS I H« WELLS

                                       WELL NO.                                  attachment
                                                 UIC:   370922
                                                 3. Total thickness of tne confining :ore: 2,480  ft.
                                                 4. Snnual voluse injected:  35,700,000 g  83/00/00
                                                 49,980,000 g  32/00/00

                                                 1. Voncompliarce actions continued:
                                                 Resolution of enforcer-fit action: December  1380,effluent
                                                 leanace ; well *as worked ovsr beginnmg of Deceatsr 9,1980.
                                                 3rd qurtsr, 1933, well c/iarts Hill be dated, annul us pressure
                                                 will bs kept )cOO psi, unless justified to  be lower.
                                                 1. Persits:   SCRfl:   LQD 008213191   Intsrior
                                                 NPDES:   Lfl 00089H       preposai
                                                 L'lC:   370S20
                                                 3. Total thickness of the cotrimng zore: 1,515  ft.
                                                 4. finnual voliw injects:  £0,500,000 g 53/00/00
                                                 £7,£00,COO 5 32/CO/OO
                                                 5. ^ajoi* injection strean ctn^rents proviCea fay tne cofioany:
                                                 Qrthodichlorcbenzane:  10          Chorobernen:  11
                                                 Aniline:  1,630                    Diamincdior'sylwthare:
                                                 NitrotenidCttj: 145                                  275
                                                 Dinitrctoluere: &5                 -henol:  122
                                                 Dipherylaaiine:  16
                                                 Toluere Diajnire:  50
                                                       erie Dichlorice: 13
TESNECO GIL ™WM                    ">         I.EPRtY IN THEIR UIC ^CSRf.,1  (19B3'1) THIS 'WELL LEP^ED  INTO fl
                                                 ,  FRC« CfiBRfi'S XOO 3/27/35.

Texaco Inc.                             5         1. Original total dscth: 3,966 ft.
                                                 2. 'toncc-mpiiancs actions continued:
                                                 Resolution of enforcement action: totalizer installed,
                                                 icnitoririg device*; repaired, annulus orsssare logged
                                                 Ccopany did not acres with this statement; hcwsvsr,
                                                 they agreed that •conitorirg p^oole^rs Did 2x12*..
                                                 3. Peraits: hazardous ,<*aste - f'sderai  (interia status)
                                                 '-lazardous waste - state  dr.taris status - 31-6D-310-I1)
                                                 NPD'EB:  Lfl  0005041
                                                 Louisiana State WSter Dischsi":e
                                                 Louisiana State 3ir Permits: c60;1464;1335
                                                 , \T*  ' rr" , "
                                                 UIL: «^«~o
                                                 4.  Annual volume injected: 43,773,072 g 33/CO/CO
                                                 7,C67,sca g aa/oo/oo
                                                 (we)Waste Co^tporents:   CdlPCMNTS      ?PM
                                                 Sour water
                                                        Page 3

-------
                                    flDDITICNflL  ^NCOIPLIRNCE IN CLASS I HU «ELLS

           -ACUITY W*£              '."JELL  SO.                                   ftttachswnt
itco Chemical Corporation,Gretna       1          1.  Original  total  depth: 7,500 ft.
                                                 2.  Sorccaoiiarca actions continued: wellhead does  not  have aceauata
                                                 srotective iarrtsr.  SSSCLUTrCN: P^tective  barrier irrstullsti
                                                 in  a3/04/CO.

                                                 fOfi:  LPD OAZP250C-6   Intern status
                                                 VPDESsLSOCOw^l       active
                                                 UIC;   T70S59
                                                 4.  flr.nual volu.-K injsctso:   73,532,1W 3 33/00/CO
                                                 82,700,3SA g S2/CO/CO
                                                 (we) Waste "csccrents:  CC^IPCNENTS       ?=M
                                                 *etnanol          1,000
                                                 Suifits          2,OCO
                                                 TS3                 50
                                                 feantha          trace
                                                 Chiorica          tracs
                                                 .Heptane          tracs
                                                 TCC                350 avg  (200-^00)
                                                 CCD              i, CCO avg  (3,OCO-3,COO>
                                                 SOD              1,000
                                                 i-ieavy  riydrocarborrs  3vO

                                       2          1.  Criminal  total  dacth: 3,5^1 ft.
                                                 Z.  .Sonccaohares actions continued:
                                                 Resolution of enforcement action:  eecnanical  integrity
                                                 ias Ceen  restored and tr.s necessary monitoring  EC"::;y*en~
                                                 has leen  installs*!.
                                                 1  Permits:   "Ifl:  L-D C£347CS1S      >tsri.T;Part 3 due 3^/12/00
                                                 SPD£3:   LPOOC57i6          Intana,awaiting ssrait
                                                 aoohcation
                                                 UIC:    5331               ^ecenittirg  aoolication
                                                 in  34/OVOO
                                                 •i.  flnncial vol'iTe injects-3:  1,313  ,* 3?_ So/C-0/CO  >'.*=!000 "*)
                                                 •  C"A  M ^~.   ac/i-f,/i%-| (v^i'.-Jiri  ")
                                                 * ^ OwV   i " ZX.  w*». v v / v J h i — * v v v  <
                                                 ««v .^*-> fT'^p^"' -» r ^" ..^f-T— ,-,-v ^^,| Tr—^  —-^w  -^-!^»  tt  , AA I  "*\n . "> -^-^
                                                 v^vNCENl -Pi iuN -r >«<3i; -,rt_L^i_H i ^D  riu.f  'jo  U,;'JO)  ^NU •MIC..*,
                                                 (S3.55)  SSSLMINS EQLfi. ^STPLS WtD  GRSf-NICS,
                                                 CC!*CGNEKT3      '^
                                                 Crsanics        5, SCO avg
                                                 *atals          3, 500 avg
                                                 Sc:53           i, OCO avg
                                                 '»a;ar   9-3.5^':55, COO
                                                 5.  TCS ranees:  10,CCO-li>,i>CO;  .-^  rar:ss:  •*-!!,

                                                 1.  Nonccniolianca  actions rcrtin-us^:  ^ssolveri;  reanngs »ouid be
                                                 held in front cf  tr.9 ^ir^ral  Veils revisory Board.
                                                        ?ags 4

-------
                                     ADDITIONS!. NQNCCMPLIflNCE IN CUSS I HW WELLS
            DOCILITY Kfl!€
ELL NO.
ftttachscent
Velsicol Chen;.  Cora.
Sohio Chemical Company,  Vistrcn
      ai  resources Ire,
                                                 2. RCRfl coda from O.S.W,: »ID C270010812
                                                 3. Capacity: 14,000,000 SPY.
                                                 (*c)Waste Cesoonents:   OPPONENTS     PC
                                                 Carbonates
                                                 Bicaroorates
                                                 Chlorides
                                                 Na
                                                 Cr
                                                 Ca
                                                 Mg
                           65
                          £00
                          £00
                        1,100
                            7.6
                            5
                            1
         1.   The annual quantity of waste generated on site mil
         vary .Vow an anticioatsd 3,000,000 gal,  (12,500 tens)
         in 1S83 to v 40,000,000 gal,  (167,CCO tons) in subsequent
         years (data taken fro^j EFfl sersnt asohcation),
         *INCIE£NT IMVGLVI.VG acCID^TPL CCNTfiPIWICN CF FEED ;ITH PBS

         1.  contaaination note-d in several lonitcring wells,
         (we)Waste Co?.oorents:
         CCXPONENTS      PP*
         Grcanic Cyanide 4CO
         NHA               4 avg
         Chloride        650 avg
         Total Solids  4,000
         ^etnacrylonitnl?    (22

         1.  Ncncc-Dphancs actions continued:
         Resolution: operating conoar.y crur^eritly opsramg i.;r;der
         consent agrssaent.  Civil action percing  in district  court,
         sort ing, other.
         2,  Pctual date of initial injection r
-------
State
FACILITY
    NGNCCWPLIfiNCS IN CLASS I nJ *S_L3

NO.                                   ftttachaent
                                                         (we)Waste Coaocnents:   C34PCNENTS        zp*i
                                                         Filtrable solids      50,COO
                                                         ncnfiitrabls  solids     £25,000
                                                         Suifats            17,300
                                                         -orwts             1,250  avg
                                                         Acetate             1,250  avg
                                                         Chloride              250

                                                         1.  Injection  terminated:  63/OS/CO,
                                                         2.  forr-ccaolianc^  actions continued:  excsssivs injection :rsssars;
                                                         incaaclstsly  plugged  ola  aoar>dored  oil  ar<5 gas *eils
                                                         led to cent sat ration  of ground  and  surface '*ai:3r.
                                                         3.  Injection  prsssura continued:  reducKl to 1100 after acicizi."g
                                                         (wc)Wdsta Cc-apcrrsnts:
                                                         riltrafcle soliis      EC, 700
                                                        rcn-*i:traD:5  so.ics
                                                        C,,'-'i-
                                                        "orsate
                                                        .Acetats
                                                        Chi ends
                                                       !7,5CO
                                                        l,2fO  avg
                                                        1,250  avg
                                                         1,  Injection  ternn^.ed  71/05/CO.
                                                         2.  .vion-ccaoiiancs  actiom;  continuec:  sxcsssws inj?c:ion pressure',
                                                         incoaoletsly  jlucgsd  old and  a 3 atoned oil arnl gas
                                                         jteils contaairatsd surfacg and ground xatsr.
                                                         (wcJWasta  Cof^ocrsnts:   'ZC^CGNEN^S      oc^
                                                         "iltrable  solids     30,000
                                                         roir-filtrable s-oiids    r.f , 000
                                                         Saifate           17,5CO
                                                         "orrate            1,250  avg
                                                         ^cstars            1,250  avg
                                                         Chlcrids             250
                                                         SRfiVITY  GF "-£ ~A37E INJHCTED.
                                                         DIFFEr-ENT Z^E,
        a tore service L-C,
                                      1.  Sopccffloharcs  actions con: i need:  well coeracio^jxinitcri.nq
                                      ana  reccrtijig,  7r-ll-14  m :ressura  on annul'is; rrcci"jer ce'rs
                                      net  inking.  £0/10/23  ura.r,hcrizsc! dis^args v,o *,ha ^r-d.
                                                         l.SLirirPCc SPILL ^
                                                         0?(PWi7 CLEAN L'-.
                                                                Pace 5

-------
                                          E  CHflRfiCTERISTIDS  flT  NCNCO&PLIfiNCE WELLS
                                                                                                           S*fiSTE TYPE
Stauffer Chemical Co,
Great Lakes Cheaical Coro., Main plant   2


3reat lakes cheaical Corp., south plant  5


Perojet Strategic Preouisicn

Rio Bravo Disposal Facility
Kaiser flluairua 4 Cheaical Co,
lorsanto C
ffllied Ch&y. Co.


Cabot Cora

LTV Steel Cciioa
Seraral Electric
Indiana Fara Bureau Cooperanva
Inland Steel Coaoary*
3        none
                                          1        can't  perform  r^chanic!  i.test  due  to cr brine,organic
                                                  iap
                                                  rione
                                                  organics, brine
         annular press,  leake  (S3/09/25);RES: rea organic,acid
         edial act. pending

         annulus on vacuua indicated  Isak  (33/CS/ organic,acid
         26);RE:oerding
         none on record
Inornanics
         Tr£ STflTE 'sfiS ?OT f^flRE GF THIS FPCILITY  organic, inorganic, bnr.e, acid
         IMJECT!)« H\J*
         none*
acid, brine

prt-cess «aste«(at3r, contaaifatsd  sto
er, dilute acic*
                                                  none
                                                  none
                                                          wastewatsr,  cortaainated  st
                                                   ter, dilute  ac:d*

                                                   orccess aastB-tatar, contaminated sto
                                                   er, dilute  acid*
         .Tionitoring and racortincfnons reoorce-J o acid,oi*canic
         n questionnaire)
         nona
acid,silica concounds
         well construction » ooarationj.^HS-L'TICiN  acids
         : wrkover

         surface profale-js tied  into injection >tel  inorganics
         1 through psrait

         surface pixbls*5-s tied  into injection #sl  i^rganics
         1 throuch pern it
2        3»nitoring and reporting
IH3      none
1        nor*
brine, orgamcs
spent caustic ard acidic «as
Inorganics,acids,brira, ^ater
                                                         Pace I

-------
State
            FSCILITY
WftSTT CKfiRflCTcRISTICS 3T  NGNCCNPLIAMZ WELLS




   WELL HO.                 NQN03PL
UflSTE TYPE
Ni cutest Steel 1*
Sfizer Mineral and Pigasnt Co, 1*
united States Steel Corporation INS
''5 sherxin 'Jill IMS 2
3
Vulcan Materials Co. 4
3
7
8
g
'fiU *r'~s T-rr<^

Chevron Cheaical Co. 2

3

Citco ?etrci9'i3 'Core. * 1
E. I. Duccnt, Laplace 7
3
2
1
Ethyl Coro. of Batcr =ouge 1
International ^irarals ana Chemical Ccro 1
none
Hydrcoloric soill 32/W/C-g
none
none
nor*
ncre
nor*
none
none
none
none
none
wintering and rscortina*
sonitoring and r^cor^ing
acnitcring and rsccrting
^
nore
sonucring and rswr^in-g
sonitoring and rsoor^ing
•sonitorirg a:1^ rsoorf.r.g
sonitorins and rscoriinct CaSins leak (1
?S2 cor'^c; ed ) *
acnitcrirg reccrcs. inccrsisits^cy :n an
nuius pressure
3»nitoring necorcs; irccrsi=t='"cy in ann
uius pressure
none
none
fere
none
annulus ftcnitorinn
rcre
icnitorina ard recornns
acid, brine, *atar, setal
organic
acid, brine, *atsr
uetals, brine
•set a Is, brine
organics, inorganics
organics, inorganics
organics, inorganics
ornanics, inorganics
organic, inorganic
acid
acid
acid, organic
organic, acid
acic, organic
acid
acid
organic, acid
organic. ac:d
acid, organic
orcanic. ,Tjia : s, 2r- r^

orcanics, acic. ^atsr
_
«:9r,;rganics,acic

:rgan:c. ;ri-e
crcan-.c,:rin2, ircrga.".^
organic, brine, :"C":a' ic
brine, rrgartics
acid, organics
organic, acid, ^tsr
International  Minerals  3rd Chemical Ccro 2        aonitoring,  rsccrting
                                                                                                oracnic,acid
                                                               ?a:e 2

-------
             FACILITY Nfli€
WfiSTE CHflRPCTERISTICS AT NCNCGMPLIflNCE WELLS




   WELL NO.                NGNCCMPL.
«fiS~E TYPE
toll ins Environmental Services of

Rubicon Chemical Inc.


Shell Chesucal Ccraoany

Shell Oil Cossoany, East site





Shell Oil Ccaoany, West site




Stauffer Chemical Ccacaiy


TENNECO OIL CCMPflNY



•A
Texaco Inc.




I Vi i *-VM -i 1 " WJ-A
urn royal A re*

L£, Inc 1

1
-5
3
5
4
5
S
7
8
9
4
8
2
5
6
9
2
1
3
?
3

4

5
4
2

1
6
2
3
sonitcring ecuis. rat installed by 83/04
/23; Resolved
monitoring ar.d report ing-*
TOnitcring arc resort ir:
*ell oD8ration,TOnitori,'ig ard resorting*
lack of inhibitor f'.uic in annul us
lack of inhibitor fluid in aro.uiLS
N/fl
N/fl
N/fl
S/fl
N/fl
N/fl
N/fl
N/q
N/fl
N/fl
N/fl
ncna
rscre
none
USDW CQN^LNfiTICN.CLEP'J UP IN PROCESS*
Barrier costs and breaks in ccrtiuous TO
nitoring
Barrier posts ard breaks in co.it i^ous TO
nitoring
.•nonitoring ard r2Kr';ing
acnitoring £ rsccrting
aonitoring { rsccrting;3esol'jtior:irstal
la. of recorder
continuous monitor ing
aonitorirg are recortirc*
ncne
ncr.s
crgamcs, 3ri,'e, alkaline

organic
cr-ga'ic
organic
organic. aci2,:r:r9.neavy metals
orgaric, brine, acid,"sav/ -etals
organic
organic
organic
organic
organic
organic
organic, acid
organics, xatsr
organics, water
organic, acid
organic. acid
arine*
brine*
brine

organic, brins

Dr if e, orgsviic
.
acid,orgar,ic
acid,or:£r,ic
organic, acid

acid, bri~!?, organic
acid, organic
organic, acic, arirs
organic, aci^., .""."r
univsrsal Oil
                    nq ard recortina; Resolution:  cs  ac:c,b,-
                                                   ndino
                                                   sxinitoring ard reoortiric; ,i9solutior:;oen acid^stal, ;ri"2, silicor
                                                          Pace 3

-------
State
             FACILITY NflHE
WSTE CrflRflCraiSTICS flT NCNCCSPLIflNCi sELLS

   i€LL NO.
XI    BftSf Uvandotta
      DC* Che«.  Co,
      Ford fotor Co.,  -iougs St&sl
      ^cskirs Xanufaciunng Co.
      Total Petroisia Inc. *
      'velsicoi Chsn.  'Cora.
"S    riitrol Cora.
                                                      TYPE
            Chemical Corxration, Srstna
Ititco 'Chemical Corcoration,.-'ilnville     !        fens
                                         8
                                         IM
                                         3-2

                                         1
                                                        ainq
                                                  no acDarent ID*; irccnsistant aor-itor:,^;  crcanic, 3r;re, ac::
                                                                                                     ai, ac:d, organic
                                                        annuius - injection ecnaunicationtresolv  saUl, acid, organic
                                                        ed*
                                                  rxins
                                                  none
                                                  none
                                                  sc«e i
                                                  abi?*

                                                  rcne
                                                  *wne
                                 brine,or^anics, rstals
                                 organic. pest;c:c'es,ratals
                                 orcanics, xstic:.dss, ;ri'=
                                 orcanics, desticicas, ::ri"9
                                 crcaiics
                                 :rqanics

idsr,;  in-'arr-B-d;  re dstaiis avail brina, acis,crimes.,metals
                                 cr:an:cs. acid's*
                                 organic?,, acids*-
                                 bnne
                                               C3 5
                                                IB
                                                        SL^PECTD LSD-*1
                                                        TIGN BLPCK C"£:
      Chemical 'aaste ^aracesent, 1,-x.
      Sohio Chanical Coac-any, Vistrcn
                                                  well Bailed rficrari

                                                  'r*>&l 1 fail 3d vsc^ap
                                                  wll failsd -Mchanica:  intscriiy  tsst     varies

                                                  «ell s,K,ut d»n on o£/ll/10;inj.  dress."'   orcanidally
                                                                Oace  4

-------
             FACiLITY Nfip£
United States Steel Corporation
finerican fiirhres Ire.
Cheaical Resources Inc.
Rock'aell International





Paoco Oil Co.
                                      WflSTE CKfiRftCTERISTICS  AT NONCGHPLIfiNCE '*£LLS

                                         Ucii.  !«J.                 \C,MXril-L
2*

1
                                                   jresolved.*

                                                   contamination noted in several wnuorin organically beurd cyanide groups
                                                   g  wells,

                                                   contamination noted in several raomtcnn organically bound cyanide groups
                                                   g  wells.
                                                   none
                                                   coaraunication to  annulus
                                                                                            or^anics, brire
                                                   failed  mechanical  integrity testi^E:send cyanide,:ietals,solv=r,t3
                                                   ing  83/11/9.
                                                   nore
                                                                                            Petals, Inorganic
                                                  well  construe., operation,Jnorutorirc ar.d  ac:a, crira, sesticides.orgar.ics
                                                  reoorting*

                                                  personnel training  records ir,cci2l5'.e '  alkaline.acir.crgarics

                                                  fractursd confining zone*,  fluid lea-<    3ul3ir:o linucr
                                                  fractured confining icr^-'t,  *luic lea*    suloir.n licuic
                                                  fractured confining :o*;e*,  "L^ID LE-K    Dueling liqaio"
                                                  none
                                                                                            orcaric.srine,scent caustic
                                                   exceeded  cermitted inj.  rate f;r 5 ^nsa cr: = ric, HCL,' ..ate-, 52='t :a_;t:c
                                                   cutive  Tjcmhs
nrco Chefc, Co., Lyordale plant

Badische Corp, (Dow Padiscre Co.!


Brcwima - Ferris Industries
Ceiarssa D.c-'iical Co,, Cl^ar Laxs plant    1

    Dlin, Soitex  S  1CI, Co.^us Oristi   2
         none
         none
         ncrs
         none
         none

         THIS '«cll ?LLcG£D L'F,HIEH  L'JJECTICN  P'ES
         S'JRES*
                                                                                                 ,
                                                                                            orcar.ic
Chaisohri, Soltsx  5 ICI, Corpus C-.nsti   1         ncr.e
                                                                                            caustic, organic
                                                          Page  5

-------
Stats
r-«r«fi -"TV XV^VC
rH^iL- 1 T rv-rx
rS3n3i""»a1 '"h cnr-'-a 1 P"- (^?* 1 *
w*'aU
D-
^

1
2
1
CHARACTERISTICS PT NGiNCCMPLISViLc WELLS
^V^TSS
i Wt is?
none

none
none
none
rone
none
none
none
none
ncns .
none
none
*cre
exceeaec inj. rate in 1:51.

rcn«
:njscT9c! rats 2xc"e^sd W^X o*1 52/11/22.
*
none
none
none
I none
3 none
calibration of el;v. totalizer .^ig.- (no:
"0" «itn no flow,
rone
none
^U. BLC^ CU-*
;«STE 7^?E
-i • •
organic, acid. uri'«, cesticic'es,^
stic, scrucber ^ast2
organic. acid, brine, "irs^al, -eta;
organic, acid, brira, siranais, ret •
acia, organic
acid, organic
organic, acid
alkaline, sodiu/i iydrx5-
-------
Witco Cheuical Co.,Houston
   CHfiRfiCTERISTICS fll NC,\CC.MPLIfiNCE *ELLS

WELL NO.

2
                                                                                                          XflSTZ
out of ccaoiiarce en injsc.  i annuius Dr acid,organic,3fire
ess.  i recorcing
                                                         Paga 7

-------

-------
                             SECTION 10
Data on
   "Such other information as the ^Administrator may, in his
   discretion, dean necessary to define the scope and nature
   of hazardous wasce disposal in the United States throuqh
   underground injection."

-------

-------
                                OPERATIONAL STflTUS AND RCRA ID FDR CLASS I HW HOIS
                                                                            STATUS
AK

AL


AR




'CA

wU

R.



11





IN












Arco Alaska Inc.

Stauffer Oieaical Co,


Ethyl Corn.
Great Lakes Chemical Ccro. , .lain Diant
Great Lakes Chetaical Core., South slant


Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Cc«!oany
Rio Bravo Discosal facility
SrELL OIL COMPANY
U.S. CORP. CF EK6INHHS AND CHEMICAL CGR?.
Kaiser Aluainui 1 Chtfaical Co.
Monsanto Ccacany


Allied Chera. Co.
Caoct Coro.

L~V Steel Conoany*
Velsicoi Cere.

Bethlenesi Steel Corporation, Burn Harbor Plant

General Electric

Hoskirrs Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Fam Bureau Coooerativs
Inland Steel Ccaioany>

.li&west Stsal
?^::er ,1ir.eral and Pig.tent Co.

Uni royal Ir.c. t
Lilted Statt»s £t?el Corcoratioi
2*
1*
3
1
2
1
2
3X
4
5
1
i


i
3
1
u
.
2
1
!
1
2
H»
U
2
1
1
IN3
2
i
U
1*
2*
1
IN9
cendirig
ACTIVE
abanciorec*
active
active
active
active
active
active
abandoned t
ACTIVE*
ACTIVE *
?:'.P~r*
SHJT-IN*
active
activel
active
active
active
active
active!*
activel
activel
active
active
active
abandonee*
abanaonec*
.Active
activel*
Activel
active
active
asar.dorsd t
aoardo.^d t
abar.cor^c:
activel

A
-------
                                 CPERflTIQNflL  STATUS W,'D SCSfl ID FCR  CLASS I r»i WELLS
State
XY
FRCILITY !W€

Vulcan Materials Co,




E.I. Ducont De Sescure J 'Co.

Risen can Cyanaaid -Co.




Orcadian Core-oration*
Atlas ?roc»S5inq Co.
SASF yyamJotte Corporation
sc^sn Chesiical Co.


dro'wrt i riQ"*" °TT is i r& us^n £S \ u*iLwij *
Chevron Chestical Co.

Citgo Petroiaua Cora. *



E, I. Ducont,Laalace





Ethyl -Core, of Eaton Scuce
Georgia-pacific Corporation
International ''irsrals anc Cheaical Corp,
*cn3ar,to Chemical Cocsany. Ailing slant

rihbH, i , 1 Ui :^Uw ^S^SAJUI^ *a^..*»i?
•tolhns Environfsental Ssrvicss of LA, Ire
Suoicon Chemical Ire,

'«ELL VO.
0
u
4
2
7
3
q
1
p
1
2
3
4
5
*
1
>1
1
a
3
t
p
3
1
2
4
3
T
0
J
3
'
1
i
t
2
•
£
i
^
2
STQ7-3
abandonee t*
active
active
active
active
active
act i ve
active
active
active
active
active
active
construction
acar<2or;5C
active!
active
active
active
active
active I
active
active
active
j'ist crillec
active
act ivsl
active!
act ive I
active".
act ive I
active!
active!
active
Inactive
act ivel
active
active
act ive
act iv si
active
active

HSD



"'SC
VCT,
XYD
XYD
J5D
LAD
^D
_AD
L"D
*
_AD
LPD


LAD
_AD
-AD
-CD
_PD
_?D
— "i
_AD
_SD
_^
_=D
" n
~~ J
_-D
_AD
Lr J
_AD
uAD
_AD

"^
.AD
-.^D
i >-_)
RCiA ID
0-071 £2233




007^202?
002?£il?3
0€23241r3
OC8175350
CC317S330
V v C i / v^w "TV
OCa 17:330
OCS173:?0

:oao3232-+
^OT^SSCS


003313^9
OCCfilSSft*
03"lrrc02
03413^3 j£
0^-£OS03SO
''C 5050330

A5C3o::o
00 13? 0357
"C0153C357
OO^S-
** j"\ ' "*" "" ~" iZ~7
^ • J i C ™ V\j — (
J°-3 -'j--'
-/1. 3 r '.'-;;
OC051:»127
037117i3i
, .Tv - J / w 7J
'.'.L .O ^ y w^ ,

XlTCOTIS
/Np^i-r7;;..)^
""08213191
\ — i -_
                                                         3;s"= ?

-------
Stats
      OPERflTIGNflL STATUS  AND  RCRfl ID FOR CLASS ! HW *ELLS




FACILITY Nfi!€

Shell C'neaical Cosoany

Shell Oil Company, East site






Shell Oil Cceioany, Uest sita




Stauffsr Chemical Ccwany


TENNECO GIL CGWPPNY


Texaco Inc.




I'm royal Inc.


I'm versa! Oil Products


>litco Chemical Ccrcoratioi^retna
4itco Che-meal Ccr»ration, -ar.r-vills

rtyarsdotte Chemical Corporation
BASF 'i-tyartbtte


Detroit Ccks Gc'-oany


Cc« Chers, Co,

3
4
5
4
5
5
7
8
9
2
8
2
5
6
3
2
1
3
•>
3
4
5
4
2
1
6
2
3
1^
7*
6
5
1
1
u
D-2
1
2
3
1
2
3
5
0
active
activel
activel
active
act : ve
active
active
active
active
abardonec*
activel
active
active
abandoned-*
active
activel
abandoned t
active
PBPNDC^ED
active
active
active
active
activel
active I
activel
active
act z ve
active
construct ici
activel
activel
active
active
active
oermttad
aza-C-sd
active
active
Pet i ve
Active
Active
abanccnsc*
•„ ' . r -r,
LAD 003213131

LAD 001313133
LAD 00313S379
_2D ;031ES373
LPD 0051353^9
LQD 0031 35573
LfiO 0081S5573
LPD 008186573
LPD 0031E5573
LAD 380622104
.AD 380622104
LCD 330££210i
LAD 330S22104
c\r\ "sr^Aco ' i"" A
— r LI j O>^D*_i_ _ _ i
LAD 33Ccc7051*
LQD ?5C6c7."£l
.AD 38C£27051

LAd 003173707
LPD COS 1/3707
LPD 0654651 i?,
_AD 055435 l-'b
LPD 063-3!; lit
' T1^ ^T'rer'ifj-
L^-J '>T) J-^O^ri -^O
LAC 0654551 ^
LPD OOS1S4060
_.QD C031340SO
.AD 003134 ?50
""

_AD 057103^3
L?D 04342600^
LAD v"S54 . '.'3 . £
LPD C55470316
_AD 0407763C3

1ID 045Zc33£6
yID 046S£33:5
0331 4704-1
)331 <*704+
C331 470**


                                                                          abar.co'iec
                                                        Page 3

-------
                                OPEHflTIGNfil  STATUS SW RCRfl  ID FCR CLASS I HH i£L.3
Stats
FACILITY Nft€
ST3TUS
-n.-o
i^C
CH
CK

E.I. Duoont,Xontacue
Ford *ctor Co. , tous? Stssl

Hoskirvs Manufacturing Co.
Parks Davis i Co.



7>ie Uojohn Co.
Total Petroleus Inc.*

Velsicol Ctiesi. Corp.
Filtrol Corn.
r£HCCf INfi



Srrcxi St&ei Coro.

Calhio O.eiaicai Inc. *

Cheaicai 'waste *anac sse.it, Ire.




Sohio Chwicai Ccacany, Vistrcn


United States Steei Corporation

Agrico Chea. co.
African Qirhr-es Ire.
.,
Cheaicai Pssources Ire,
Kaissr


'Soasx
3
1
D-!
D-2
t
2
1
3
4
•5
u
1
2
2
•,
C3 5
IS
17 fi
C8 4
J.
2
i
,3
Q

3
i
5
!M
i
3
3
i
2*
^
O
i
1
1
5

1
abandoned ^ID 00072472^
abanccreo* *ID OOC80S6»C
acar
-------
GPERflTICHflL STflTUS flND RCHfl ID FOR CLfiSS
Stir 2 FPC'LITY ":"•'•£ '//ELL \0.
2
1
TX Ptnoco Gil Co. 5
4
3
2
1
firco Ches. C3. , Lyondale slant 3
2
1
Badische Cora. (Bet* Badischs Co,) 2
1
Browning - Ferris Industries 1
Celarese Chemical Co. 4
1
2
3
Caianese Cbemcal Co, , Clear Lake slant 1
2
Charaohn, Soltsx i ICI, Corpus Christi Petro 2
1
Chaoarral Di5ocsai Co. (BFI!* 1
Chesiical Uaste ^ana^&Knt 1
CrDflCfiL *AS"rE ^PNPSE^ENT, INC 1
i
Cominco Si-erican Ire. 1
Disposal Syste-K, Inc. 1
E. I. Duoont,Bsau,sount 2
1
E. I. Duoont, Houston slant 1
0
3
I. I. Duaont, Inglesics 3
1
3
E. I. Duoont, Saoine River worxs 3
10
8
7
6
CDN3
5
4
E. I. Ducont, Victoria - 2
3
I HW WE.LS
STflTLo
aDandoned
abanccred
oer-nittec*
36^1 1 tec*
activel
active!
activel
abandor.ee*
active
act i ve
fictive*
active
pending
activel
active
active
active
active
activsl
activel
active I
actws
active
ACTIVE
PENDING*
cfcanceover*
active
activel
active!
active
active
active
active
fictive^
activel
Actwa*
active
activel
abar.dorsd-J
active
fictive-*
active
activel
active
act i ve
l"5f*"*A T T
RC.xfl II




TXD 008030333
TXD 003030533
TXD 008080533
TXD 053275769
TXD 058-275763
TXD 056275763
TXD 008081637
TXD 00303 1S37
TXD 000719104
TXD '""cSO^OTCS



TXD 078422457
TXD 073^32-57
TXD CCO£3£445
TXD 000-835^45
TXD 091270017
TXD 000761254
TXrOC0328£95

"0 081715302
*XD 0-C0713513
TXD OOcOSllOl
TXD-OC3081101


TXD 008073212
TXD 06310!":'+
~XD 063101734
~XD C63101734

TXD 0(380736-42
TXD 002073642


'XD C-030736^2


TXD 008123317
TXD M3 1223 17
Pace 5

-------
                                CPERflTIC.NAL STflTUS fiND ^Rfl  ID "05 CLPS5  I HW UEJ.3
State
fTQTTI rTV UC1C
I rHrf*4_i i I VTTlfc








Esnak, Inc.
General ftnihrs and Fils Corn.


Silbraltar Uastewaters, Ire,
*alor« Service Co,

,Menc^efl co.
^cnsanto Cheraical Co., Chocolate Bayou



/tenssnto Co.

CMllias Chemical Co.

?otas
-------
             to

             JJ
             to
             AJ
             C/3
                         cn
                         cn
                         0)
                         O
                         O
                         0)
                         in
                         3
                         cn
                         O
                        rH
                         O

                         c
                                    en
                                      0
rH JJ     T
jj  ra     co
 c  cr-     cr\
 0 -rH     rH
 cn JJ
 0  en      >-
 jj  0      ra
 a  >     2
     c

 0          0
 >  CT      CT
•H  c      cr
JJ -r-(      3
 y  0     rH
 0
 CT

 3
rH
Oj
                                                                                                                                                               CN
                                                                                                                                                               cc
                                                                                                                                                               cn
                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                    CT
             cn
*
co
            
             0
            JO
             £
CO
CO
fit.
O

co
C-t

CO
O
CJ
O
            •H
            O
            ra
            Cu
0
U
•H
in
0
CO
CT
C
•H
JJ
rH

U
0
a
c
3
03

CO
Xj
0
T3
C
ra
CO


9
rH

JJ C
ra 0
CJ C*
0
CJ
rH
ra
y
•H
s
0
x:
CJ

o
rH
_Q
0
2^
n





•
O
a

»,
o
rH
.C
0
3
a,
Arsenal

c
• rH
ra
JJ
c
3
O
•g

^
.y.
'y •
0 0
***' ? ~\
i — i ^

CT
C
•rH
JJ
ra
1 — 1
CM

>t
l_l
3
JJ
c
0
CJ
                                                                            Cu
en
cn
0
0
^_j
,— I
O
00

J^
-~J •
SJ O
o cj
3
CO rH
CT ra
c c
•H -rH
rH g
-H !H
0 0
m ^H



rH
Cu
fc
0
rH
ra
T2
Vi
0
•c
3
ra
j

jj
i.j
O
Clw
•
o
c
^
cn
c
0
c
0
D.
E
O •
CJ rH
Ctl
rH
ra «•
^-i O
0 CT
C !H
0 fO
~^D ^— ^
                                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                                   CJ   •
                                                                                                                        c
                                                                                                                   JJ  rH
                                                                                                                   ra  jj
                                                                                                                   -C  JJ
                                                                                                                   c  o
                                                                                                                   •H  y
                                                                                                                   0  .H

                                                                                                                   3  -H
                                                                                                                   o  cu
                                                                                                                                cn
                                                                                                                                y
                                                                                                                               •H
                                                                                                                                C
                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                               x:
                                                                                                                               CJ
                                                                                                                                ra
                                                                                                                               •H
                                                                                                                                in    .
                                                                                                                               JJ  >-D
                                                                                                                                en    •
                                                                                            c    -
                                                                                           (H  JJ

                                                                                            O  O
                                                                                           jj  a
                                                                                            c  0
                                                                                            ra  CT
                                                                                            CO  T3


                                                                                            °  ii
                                                                                           ^-  U-J
                                                                                                            kJ
                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                            JJ
                                                                                                            ra
                                                                                                            3
                                                                                                            0  rH
                                                                                                            3  rH
                                                                                                           rH   (D
                                                                                                            C  5
                                                                                                 •  ra z
                                                                                                O  co
                                                                                               cj  O   -

                                                                                                ra  to  0
                                                                                               T3 -H JJ
                                                                                                c Q  ra
                                                                                                o      s
                                                                                                y rH  (D
                                                                                                03 rH  3
                                                                                                C -rH rH
                                                                                               < r: CQ
                                                                                                                                                                y
                                                                                                                                                                c
                                                                                                                cn
                                                                                                                <•"•
                                                                                                                O
                                                                                                               CO

                                                                                                               -o
                                                                                                                c
                                                                                                                ra
                                                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                                               n
                                                                                                                                                                o
            0
            •U
            ra
            jj
            CO
 ra
 g
 ra

 ra
rH
<
                                   o
                                   T3
                                   ra
                                   VH
                                   O
                                   rH
                                   O
                                   CJ
                                    ra
                                   •o
                                   •iH
                                    rJ
                                    0
                                   rH
                                   Cu
                                                                   ra
                                                                   c
                                                                   ra
                                                                   •r-l
                                                                   'O
                                                                   c
                                                                   r-l
                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                en
                                                                                                                                in
                                                                                                                                0
                                                                   0
                                                                   2
                                                                                   O
                                                                                   U
                                                                                  •H
                                                                                   X
                                                                                   0
                                                                        3=
                                                                        0
                                                                       2
                                                           j*:
                                                            SH
                                                            O
                                                           >n

                                                            5
                                                            0)
                                                           z

-------
                                                                       CO
             4J
             ro
             ^j
             C-1
                             C3
 CT>
 3
r-4

O,
                                          CO
                                                       JJ
                                                      •H
                                                       to
                                                                                    w
0
4J

LI
O
•H
Ll
C,

T3
3)
O
CT'
3
i— 1
CX

<;
,_2
CJ
CSS
Cd
CJ
-~*

V
01
CT
CT
3
1—1
O<
T
r— 1

r-t
•1-4
Ll
/->

0
^
0
CT
CT
                                                                                                                                      w

Ci
3
1
C
ru
CD
r-l
O

<£.
"!
CJ
~
CJ
r— {
CO
cn
i— i

><
ro
S

TP
OJ
CT
CT
3
cu
CO
CPi
rH

.
>
O
z:

•a
CJ
CT

3
£X
O
CJ
r-l


CO

                                                                                                G
a
             u
                              u
                              C
                              3
                              C  Li
                              0  OJ
                             j-j r:
                              ro  1)

                             CJ  Cij
                                          OJ
                                           D   CO
                          0   ro


                          C    -
                          O  C-
                                                       .13
                                          O

                                          CO



                                          CJ
                                                                                    o  en
                 Q-.      O
                                                      CD  E-i

                                                      Cfl   C
                                                      W   0
                                                      GJ  —H
                                                                                                o
                                                      CT  r:
                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                             c   -
                                                                                CJ

                                                                                o
                                                                                            "C   ra
                                                                                            i!  r>,
                                                                               C   £
                                                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                                                     CJ
                                                                                                                                      CD    -
                                                                                                                                      £  O
                                                                                                                                                   O
•^  CO
 ~  ro
O '—i
             OJ
             4J
             03
 VJ
 Ll
 tT3
CJ
 O
•z.
CO
c
c
0)
ex
                                                                                                                                                   c
                                                                                                                                                   CJ
                                                                                                                      u
                                                                                                                      OJ
                                                                                                                                                                    ra
                                                                                                                                                                   CJ
                                                                                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                                                                                   CO

-------
O
CJ

00
Ci3
o

S-i
0!
                    CC
                     in
                     CO
                     
•fH
>j CO
4J 03
•H 0)
rH U
•H rr.,
0 O
m u
cu a,
CJ
CO
0
rH
rH
•H
>
C
0
10
CLj
s
CO
en
c
•H
JJ
CD
CD
E •

O
-H *.
C !M
•H 1)
£ CX
0 C:
Q CL)
c.
T3 --i
rH 3
O cj
General Organic Chemical Corp.
Fredericksburg, Va .
U-l
O
S^4
CU
r;
e
3
z
rH
03
4-1
0
H
                                                                                              o
                                                                                              Sj
                                                                                              (0
                                                                                             'O
                                                                                              0)
                                                                                              §
                                                                                              O

                                                                                             ra
                                                                                              c
                                                                                             T3
                                                                                              OJ
                                                                                              0)
                                                                                              o
                                                                                              o
            0)
            4J
                                 rtj
                                •r-l

                                 C
                                                                                 CO
                                                                                •H
                                                                                x:
            CO

-------