EPA 440/l-76/060b
 Group II      ,
   Development Document for Interim
  Final Effluent Limitations^Guidelines
 and Proposed New Source Performance
            Standards for the
            Gum and Wood
        Chemicals Manufacturing
         Point Source Category
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                APRIL 1976

-------
             DEVELOPMENT  DOCUMENT
                      for
                 INTERIM FINAL
       EFFLUENT  LIMITATIONS,  GUIDELINES
AND PROPOSED NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

                    for the

     GUM AND WOOD CHEMICALS MANUFACTURING
            POINT SOURCE  CATEGORY
                Russell E.  Train
                 Administrator

         Andrew W.  Breidenbach, Ph.D.
           Assistant Administrator
      for Water and Hazardous Materials

                Eckardt C.  Beck
      Deputy Assistant Administrator for
         Water  Planning and Standards
              Ernst P.  Hall, P.E.
Acting Director,  Effluent Guidelines Division
               Joseph S.  Vitalis
                Project Officer
                      and
                George M.  Jett
          Assistant Project Officer
                   April 1976

          Effluent Guidelines Division
   Office of Water and Hazardous Materials
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Washington, D.C.   20460
              Environmental Protection Agency-
              Region V9 Library
              230 South Dearborn Street
              Chicago, Illinois  6060H

-------
JIGMCY

-------
                          ABSTRACT
This document presents the findings of a study  of  the  gum
and  wood  chemicals manufacturing point source category for
the  purpose  of   developing   effluent   limitations   and
guidelines  for  existing  point  sources  and  standards of
performance and pretreatment standards for new and  existing
sources,  to  implement  Sections  301 (b) ,  301 (c) ,  304 (b) ,
304 (c), 306 (b), 306 (c), 307 (b)  and  307 (c)  of  the  Federal
Water  Pollution  Control  Act,  as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251,
1311, 1314(b) and (c) , 1316(b)  and 1317(b) and (c) , 86 Stat.
816 et. seq. P.L. 92-500)  (the "Act").

The development of data and recommendations in this document
relates to the gum and wood  chemicals  manufacturing  point
source  category,  which  is  one  of  the  eight industrial
segments of the miscellaneous chemicals manufacturing  point
source  category which was originally published in February,
1975.  The gum and wood chemicals manufacturing point source
category is divided into six subcategories on the  basis  of
the characteristics of the manufacturing processes involved.
Separate   effluent  limitations  were  developed  for  each
subcategory on the basis of the level of raw waste load, raw
materials  and   the   degree   of   treatment   achievable.
Appropriate  technology to achieve these limitations include
biological  and  physical/chemical  treatment  systems   and
systems   for   reduction   in   pollutant  loads.   Various
combinations of in-plant and  end-of-pipe  technologies  are
also considered.

Supporting   data  and  rationale  for  development  of  the
proposed effluent limitations, guidelines and  standards  of
performance are contained in this report.
                                   111

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS


Section                     Title                    Page

         Abstract

         Table of Contents

         List of Figures

         List of Tables

   I     Conclusions                                   1

  II     Recommendations                               7

 III     Introduction                                 13

  IV     Industrial Categorization                    25

   V     Waste Characterization                       51

  VI     Selection of Pollutant Parameters            59

 VII     Control and Treatment Technologies           81

VIII     Cost, Energy, and Nonwater Quality
         Aspects                                      93

  IX     Best Practicable Control Technology
         Currently Available  (BPT)                   115

   X     Best Available Technology Economically
         Achievable  (EAT)                            121

  XI     New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)      125

 XII     Pretreatment Standards                      127

XIII     Performance Factors for Treatment Plant
         Operations                                  131

 XIV     Acknowledgements                            135

  XV     Bibliography                                139

 XVI     Glossary                                    151

XVII     Abbreviations and Symbols                   183
                                v

-------
                      LIST OF FIGURES
Number                   Title                        Page

III-1         Interrelationships of Present Gum
              and Wood Chemicals Manufacturing         22

IV-a          Charcoal Briquet Plants Map              28

IV-1          Char and Charcoal Briquet Manufacturing  35

IV-2          Gum Rosin and Turpentine Production      38

IV-3          Wood Rosin, Pine Oil, and Turpentine
              Production via Solvent Extraction        40

IV-4          Crude Tall Oil Fractionation and
              Refining                                 42

IV-5          Distillation and Refining of Essential
              Oil                                      44

IV-6          Rosin Derivatives Manufacture            46

VII1-1        BPCTCA Cost Model for
              Subcategories C and D                    97

VIII-1A       BPCTCA Cost Model,
              Subcategories B, E and F                 98

VIII-2        BATEA Cost Model for
              Subcategories C and D                   100

VIII-2A       BATEA Cost Model,
              Subcategories B, E and F                101

VII1-3        BADCT Cost Model                        103
                               VII

-------
                       LIST OF TABLES
Number                   Title                        Page

1-1      Summary Table                                  3

II-1     BPCTCA Effluent Limitations Guidelines         8

II-2     BATEA Effluent Limitations Guidelines          9

II-3     BADCT Effluent Limitations Guidelines         10

III-1    Production and Product Value                  21

IV-1     Statistics by Geographical Areas              29

IV-2     Comparison of Raw Waste Loads by
         Product Grouping                              31

IV-3     Factors Considered for Basis of Gum
         and Wood Chemicals Segment Sub-
         categorization                                33

V-1      BPCTCA Raw Waste Loads                        52

V-2      Miscellaneous Raw waste Load Data             56

VI-1     List of Parameters Examined                   61

VII-1    Treatment Technology Survey                   83

VII-2    Treatment Plant Survey                        84

VII-3    Historic Treatment Plant Performance          85

VII-4    Summary of COD Carbon Isotherm Data           89

VIII-1   BPCTCA Treatment System Design Summary       10U

VII1-2   BATEA End-of-Pipe Treatment System
         Design Summary                               106

VIII-3   Wastewater Treatment Costs for BPCTCA,
         BADCT and BATEA Effluent Limitations
         (ENR 1780 - August, 1972 Costs) Gum
         Turpentine and Rosin - Subcategory B         107

VIII-4   Wastewater Treatment Costs for BPCTCA,
                                 JLX

-------
         BADCT and BATEA Effluent Limitations
         (ENR 1780 - August, 1972 Costs)  Wood
         Turpentine and Rosin - Sufccategory C         108

VIII-5   Wastewater Treatment Costs for BPCTCA,
         BADCT and BATEA Effluent Limitations
         (ENR 1780 - August, 1972 Costs)   Tall
         Oil Fractionation - Subcategory D            109

VIII-6   Wastewater Treatment Costs for BPCTCA,
         BADCT and BATEA Effluent Limitations
         (ENR 1780 - August, 1972 Costs)
         Essential Oil - Sutcategory E                110

VIII-7   Wastewater Treatment Costs for BPCTCA,
         BADCT and BATEA Effluent Limitations
         (ENR 7180 - August, 1972 Costs)  Rosin
         Derivatives - Subcategory F                  111

IX-1     BPCTCA Effluent Limitations Guidelines       116

X-1      BATEA Effluent Limitations Guidelines        122

XI-1     New Source Performance Standards             126

XII-1    Pretreatment Unit Operations                 128

XVIII    Metric Table                                 185
                                x

-------
                         SECTION I

                        CONCLUSIONS
General

The   miscellaneous  chemicals  manufacturing  point  source
category  encompasses  eight  industrial  segments   grouped
together   for   administrative   purposes.   This  document
provides  background  information  for  the  gum  and   wood
chemicals manufacturing point source category and represents
a  revision  of  a portion of the initial contractor's draft
document issued in February, 1975.

In that document it was pointed out that the  gum  and  wood
chemicals  manufacturing  point source category differs from
the  other  segments   in   raw   materials,   manufacturing
processes,  and  final products.  Water usage and subsequent
wastewater discharges also vary considerably  from  category
to   category.    Consequently,   for  the  purpose  of  the
development of the effluent  limitations  and  corresponding
BPT    (Best   Practicable   Control   Technology   Currently
Available),  NSPS   (Best  Available   Demonstrated   Control
Technology)   for  new  sources,  and  BAT  (Best  Available
Technology  Economically  Achievable)   requirements,   each
category is treated independently.

The  gum  and  wood  chemicals  manufacturing  point  source
category is defined  to  include  those  commodities  listed
under the Standard Industrial Classifications  (SIC) 2861.

It  should  be emphasized that the proposed model technology
will be used only as a guideline.  The cost models for  BPT,
BAT,  and  NSPS  were  developed  to facilitate the economic
analysis and should not be construed as the only  technology
capable  of meeting the effluent limitations, guidelines and
standards  of  performance  presented  in  this  development
document.   There  are many alternative systems which, taken
either singly or in combination, are  capable  of  attaining
the   effluent  limitations,  guidelines  and  standards  of
performance recommended.  These alternative choices include:

    1.   Various types of end-of-pipe wastewater treatment.

    2.   Various in-plant modifications and installation  of
         at-source pollution control equipment.

    3.   Various combinations of  end-of-pipe  and  in-plant
         technologies.

-------
The  intent  of  this document is to identify the technology
that can be used to meet the limitations.  This  information
also  will  allow the individual plant to make the choice of
what specific combination of pollution control  measures  is
best  suited to its situation in complying with the effluent
limitations,  guidelines  and   standards   of   performance
presented in this development document.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

According  to the 1972 Census of Manufactures, there are 135
establishments in SIC 2861, twenty-three of  which  produced
about 86% of the value added dollars.

For   the   purpose   of   developing  recommended  effluent
limitations,   guidelines   and   new   source   performance
standards,  the  gum  and wood chemicals manufacturing point
source category have been sutcategorized as follows:

    A.   Char and charcoal briquet  manufacture  by  carbon-
         ization of hardwood and softwood scraps.
    B.   Gum  rosin  and  turpentine  manufacture  by  steam
         distillation  of  crude  gum   (exudate) from living
         longleaf pine and slash pine trees.
    C.   Wood rosin, turpentine, and pine oil manufacture by
         solvent extraction and steam  distillation  of  old
         resinous wood stumps from cut over pine forests.
    D.   Tall oil rosin, pitch, and fatty acids  manufacture
         by fractionation of crude tall oil, a by-product of
         the Kraft  (sulfate) pulping process.
    E.   Essential oils manufacture by steam distillation of
         scrap wood fines from select lumbering operations.
    F.   Rosin-based derivatives  (specifically, rosin esters
         and modified  rosin  esters)  manufactured  by  the
         cheirdcal reaction of gum, wood, or tall oil rosins.

The    criteria    used    for    establishing   the   above
subcategorization  included  the  impact  of  the  following
factors on the above groupings:

    1.   Production processes.
    2.   Product types and yields.
    3.   Raw material sources.
    U.   Wastewater quantities, characteristics,
         control, and treatment.

The  wastewater  parameters  of significance in gum and wood
chemicals manufacturing point source category were found  to
be BOD5, COD, TSS, TOC, oils and  grease, and pH.  Chlorides,
sulfates,  total  dissolved  solids  and  zinc were considered

-------







r-.
r-
.Ot


«=C
O
fe
CQ
S-
o
q-

0)
=t
"(O
>
J

H*

Ol
C
0
_1














CO
£

Q
O
O







_J
-^
i1
_J
1



cn o
_^ -j
^ -o
\ 0
cn L-
^ o-




u
o
o
CQ


_J
cn
E




cn
_^
j*
cn
^


>.
o-
o
o
c
.C
u
£

4-J
c



ro

cn
fO
_c
u
in
"O

•^










O
un

0
O
rn
«*



r-v
CN

CN





o
^r
CO




•







S




iH
rH
m
o


+j
c —

*> o
(D D-
tu in

4J -D
— (l>

O "O

tn,—
O in

O -o

co to





O
MD
"**






00
o

r--
o
5


-_
r«->











O r*\
\O CO
CO LA
-4-



CD
m

CO
r--
rn







CN




•^r
rH
H




CO
O
r^


4-J
C —
OJ (D
E in
4-- 0
CD a.
a) vi
u .—
4-* T3
— 1)
ft) cn


m —
O w

"o -o
— c
CD fD





O
O
J-







fT\

xO
CO
o
J-
^"

CO
o"
r--










0 0
O UTi
r".J".
CN P-.
vO "—


S

o
s
[^



CN
r-"\

CNI




O
(Ni
^r
r-l




0
•V
•^r
o


4-1

4) (D
4J 0
fD D-
QJ W

•U "D
—  c

« 0
1 — 14-
₯£
0
-J 0)
o

D
o
l/>

3
4)
-z.



























CO
CO
c^
s
•=c
CQ
^
(/>
0>
13

fO
>-
E
QJ
1
cn
C
o
	 1








CO
f-

Q
O
CJ









_J
cn
E


- 4-<
cn o
-^ D
^! TJ
\ 0
cn i-
^. Q_




L/
Q
0
CO


_J
cn
e



- 4J
cn o
^ D
^•g
cn i-
^ Q_


>
a
O
'o
c
.u
u
at


c

g

"o
c
JC
u
 4-1
C V)
fD QJ
C 1-
.- at
E 4-1
fD C
4-1 —

o o


















vt
0)

l_
O
a
(U
•M
fD
U
^1
D
CO



ra
< O CO
o
>- 1- >•
U fD 1-
O -C O
a o w a
D 4-i a)
+J (J) QJ 4-1
fD 3 (0
O U CT o
J3 fO — ^
n .c L. D
CO CJ CO CO
„
CO
O CO
*l_ tfl
CJ 1-
o -
H (U -
tfi C
- fo M
O 0)
O 1- -
(-J C3 -d"
0
- t*b co
LA


CO O U







CJ

ob >
QJ 1_
C C O
.— .- a
in 4-1 0)
O C 4-1
ad ai to
0_ 0
§1- .Q
D D
fj (- CO-
CO
C3
1-


CJ
o
t-


8
CJ


LA
a
0
CO
(1)
c
c
QJ
D-

D
1- 0

.._ >
CO »-
o
m QJ a
O C Q)
a: .- 4->
Q- fD
T) U
O -0 -D
O C 3
:? . LU
(/) *J
O 4J >
cc ra t_
LC 0
— 0
— Li QJ
O *J
-C fD
— U U
— 4J J3
(D — U
H- Q- CO
i/l
l~


g



S
0


LA
O
0
QQ







— U_

O >

— o
(D O1
a>
c: fo
QJ U
m .a
in D
Lu t/>
i— CO

CO C. VI
- •• CO fO QJ
S— • h- C 1-
O — QJ
t- C. - E -M
a) c nj c
- .C CN 4-> —
Q D- C
O - O «4-
(_) * — CJ O
0) CJ

LA fD "
a QJ -d-
O L- O
CQ CJ CO


tfl
QJ

l_
O
a
QJ



(0 -H Xl
ep -ti 3
M

i/i jj
o 3
o: Q ,
                                  —  CO
                                  —  CO
                                  O  I-

-------
and  rejected  as  having  a  minor  influence  on  effluent
discharges.  In addition, for subcategory F phenol was found
to be a significant parameter.

Complete  elimination  of  discharge  of  process wastewater
pollutants should be achievable for Subcategory A, char  and
charcoal    briquet    manufacture.    Individual   effluent
limitations, guidelines and new source performance standards
were recommended for Subcategories B through F for BODS, COD
and TSS  for  NSPS  and  BAT  technology  levels.   The  BPT
limitations, guidelines and new source performance standards
for   subcategories   B  through  F  specify  BOD5  and  TSS
parameters.  Other RWL parameters were considered during the
study, and specific products or pollutants  which  might  be
inhibitory or incompatible with BPT treatment technology are
cited in Section VI.

It  was  concluded  that  the model BPT wastewater treatment
technology for this industrial segment should consist  of  a
biological  treatment  system.   Typical exemplary processes
are activated sludge or aerated lagoons with  clarification.
These  systems  may  require  pH control and equalization in
order to control variation in waste  loads,  and  phosphorus
and  nitrogen  nutrient addition to ensure maintenance of an
activated sludge with  desirable  performance  and  handling
characteristics.   These  systems do not preclude the use of
equivalent  physical/chemical  systems  such  as   activated
carbon  in  a  suitable situation where the significant land
area that would otherwise be required  (for activated  sludge
or aerated lagoon) is not available.  Additionally, in-plant
controls  are  recommended to control those pollutants which
may be inhibitory to the biological waste treatment  system,
as  well  as  segregation  of non-contact cooling waters and
utility blowdowns.

End-of-process  wastewater  treatment  technology  for   new
sources  utilizing  the  Best Available Demonstrated Control
Technology  (NSPS) is  a  biological  treatment  system  with
suspended  solids removal by means of dual-media filtration.
In  addition,   exemplary   in-plant   controls   are   also
recommended,   particularly  where  biologically  inhibitory
pollutants must  be  controlled.   These  are  described  in
section IX.

Best  Available  Technology Economically Achievable  (BAT) is
based upon the addition of filtration and  activated  carbon
to  BPT  treatment.   This technology is based upon the need
for substantial reductions of dissolved organics  which  are
biorefractory as well as those which are biodegradable.

-------
Effluent  limitations, guidelines and new source performance
standards were derived on the basis of the maximum  for  any
one  day  and  the  maximum  average of daily values for any
period of thirty consecutive days.  No  long-term  data  for
exemplary treatment were found in the gum and wood chemicals
manufacturing  point source category during this study.  The
variabilities factors  used  in  deriving  these  time-based
effluent  limitations, guidelines and new source performance
standards were derived using long-term performance data from
the  systems  evaluated  by  EPA  for   petroleum   refining
manufacturing   since   the   two   industries   have   many
similarities  (e.g., continuous  distillation  operations  of
organic  compounds)  and is judged to be reasonable transfer
of  technology.   Because  of  similarity  of  treatability,
treatment  systems,  processes  and  fit  with the daily and
monthly data.

Table 1-1 summarizes the contaminants of interest, raw waste
loads, and recommended treatment technologies for BPT,  BAT,
and  NSPS for each subcategory of the gum and wood chemicals
manufacturing point source category.

-------
                         SECTION II

                      RECOMMENDATIONS
General

The recommendations for effluent limitations and  guidelines
commensurate  with  the  BPT, BAT and NSPS are given in this
text for the gum  and  wood  chemicals  manufacturing  point
source  category.   A discussion of in-plant and end-of-pipe
control  technology  required  to  achieve  the  recommended
effluent  limitations, guidelines and new source performance
standards are included.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

Implicit in the recommended effluent limitations, guidelines
and new source performance standards for the  gum  and  wood
chemicals   manufacturing   point  source  category  is  the
assumption based on observations  of  fourteen  plants  that
process  wastes  can  be isolated from uncontaminated wastes
such as utility discharges and uncontaminated storm  runoff.
Isolation  of  process  wastewater  is  generally  the first
recommended step in accomplishing the  reductions  necessary
to  meet  the  proposed effluent limitations and guidelines.
Treatment  of  uncontaminated  wastewaters   together   with
contaminated  process wastewaters in a treatment facility is
not  generally  cost-effective  and  creates  a  great  many
operational control problems.

Effluent  limitations  and  guidelines commensurate with BPT
are presented for each  subcategory  of  the  gum  and  wood
chemicals  segment  in Table II-1.  The effluent limitations
and guidelines were derived on  the  basis  of  the  maximum
average  of daily values for thirty consecutive days and the
maximum for any one day and have been developed on the basis
of the performance factors for treatment plant operation  as
discussed  in  Section  XIII  of  this development document.
Process wastewaters subject  to  these  limitations  do  not
include non-contact sources such as boiler and cooling water
blowdown,  sanitary,  and  other  similar  flows.   BPT also
includes the  maximum  utilization  of  applicable  in-plant
pollution   abatement   technology   to   minimize   capital
expenditures   for    end-of-pipe    wastewater    treatment
facilities.   Flow for BPT is identical with flow for BAT in
this document.  End-of-pipe technology for BPT involves  the
application   of   biological   treatment,  as  typified  by
activated  sludge  or  aerated  lagoons  with  clarification
system ponds.

-------
                            LO
LO
•51-
                                                         LO
                                                                       in
                                                                                      LO
8.     S
       LO
                                                         LO
                                                         O
                                                         r-..
                                                                CN
                                                                
3 3 TO
— •— Q
M- TO -O
«4- > 4)  a
^Z 8
— 3 LU
TO U
in Q 0) 4J
0) MO
C 14- C C
O O
— O —
 O
W < M-
—1 in
1 § S g g g g
t.
Q.

M-
o
?
TO
r-
O
~cn.-LoJg LO
TO
4-1
'E
	 1

4-J
C
0) O
3 —
**- 4-> 1/1
M- C~-
1 1 1 fl\ t_
i-i_i ^y ^
3 0)
< — 4->
0 4_ 0
1 t| _.
1 *^ %O
0 LU 1_
- 1
O






§" g 1* 2 §" - §" - §" 18
^r-cdi-oai-cQi-caH-















c
O
•^
4->
U
3
TJ
O
CL

C
(U

(0
>
3
cr
0)


-------
        0)
        c
        3
       C3

        If}
        C
        o
J°
*x
 re  c
2: <
 3  re
•—  Q
 re     "O
>  a) 0)


^X
•—  3 UJ
 re  o
o    o
< **-
                                               c
                                               ro
                                               o
                                               Q.
                                                            o
                                                            CM
CO vQi—
CM roo
                     o
                     CM
    J" CTi
    O i —
                     O
                     CM
                                                          CO
                                                    O J-01
                                                    CN «— O
                                  CN
                                                                                      O
                                                                                      CM
                                                                                                   §
                                                                                                   en
                                                                                              in
                                                                                                  ,— C\J
                                                                     00
                                                                     CM
                                                                                                 j- •—
                                               (D
                                               3
                                               o
                                               o

                                               CL
        0)
        en

        (TJ
        ^
        o
        I/I
 C7)     —
^      Q


^-      O
 01     Z
                                                            Lf)
CM
CN  00
              ro
                                                                         LT>
                                                                         cyi
                                                                         o
                                                       cn

                                                    mo
                                                OJ
                                                CO
                                         CN)  CM O
                                         CN  ,- O
                                         fO  ^-
                                                                                                                                           c
                                                                                                                                           o
                                      o


                                      "o
                                      i_
                                      CL

                                      V)
                                      jo
                                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                                          o
-Q
 (D
       C
       (U
       D
                                   "~
                                    O
                                    re
                                    i.
                                    re

                                   o
  ur\
o  o oo
o  o co
co  o H
 LA

Q  Q 
-------
                    U
                    §'
        I/)
        0)
        c
        (U
       T3
        3
       C3
       O
                                 O  ID
                                **-  Q

                                 3-
                                 x
                                 ID
en
c
a

^~
M-
<4-
LU














.
3 ID
•— Q
ID -a
5* <1> Q)
> 11)
>— U
•— 4J X
••• 3 LLl
to u
a a> 4J
in O
u- c c
0 0
o —
II) r-
CT1O (D
(D CO .c
«- CO
0) l-
> O
< «•-
_l
\
O)
E












IT>
^:
^
^N.
01
^t
                                        c
                                        (D
                                        0
                                        Q_
                                               Q)
                                              4->
                                               (D
                                              Ul
                                              (U
                                              2
                                              ui
                                              (D
                                              U
                                              O
                                              !_
                                              Q.
 (U
 O)
 !_
 (D
j:
 o
 (/i

Q

 O
                                                            O
                                                            Lf>
                                                  CT\ O
                                         o
                                         LO
                                                                     CNJ  C30    0
                            •   •
                          H  LA
                                                                                             O
                                                                                             LO
                                                                                             r—    00
                                                                          o
                                                                          in
                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          ro
                                                                                                          •^r
                                                     IT)
                                                     CM
                                 LO
                                 OJ
                                         in
                                         CN
                                                in
                                                CN
                      m
                      tN
O  LAr—
r-  -o
                                                           

       'I
       C
       (1)
UJ


CJ
                                                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                                                       o
                               C •—
                               (U L.
                               3 (1)
                               — 4J
                               M- O
                               M- fo
                               UJ 1_
                                  
-------
Effluent   limitations   guidelines   to   be   attained  by
application of the BAT are presented in Table II-2.   End-of-
pipe treatment for BAT includes the addition of an activated
carbon system to the BPT treatment processes.  Exemplary in-
plant controls are also applicable to this  technology.    It
is  emphasized  that  the  model  treatment  system does not
preclude the use of activated carbon within  the  plant  for
recovery of products, by-products, and catalysts.

The  Best  Available  Demonstrated Control Technology (NSPS)
for  new  sources  includes  the  most   exemplary   process
controls,   with  biological  waste  treatment  followed  by
filtration  for  removal  of  suspended  solids.    Effluent
limitations and guidelines to be attained by the application
of  BAT  and  NSPS for subcategories within the gum and wood
chemicals manufacturing point source category are  presented
in Table II-3.

It  is  recommended  that wastewater be treated on site.  If
municipal treatment is advantageous over on-site  treatment,
a pretreatment system must be designed to remove potentially
hazardous wastes.  These wastes are identified in section VI
of this document.

Due  to the unavailability of a long-term performance record
in this industry, it is  recommended  that  the  performance
factors  be  transferred  from  the petroleum refining point
source category based on the similarities of the  categories
(continuous  distillation  operations in dedicated equipment
of basically hydrocarbon materials).  When a  more  reliable
data  base  is developed in this industry and as mandated by
the "Act", these performance factors will be reevaluated.
                               11

-------
                        SECTION III

                        INTRODUCTION
Purpose and Authority

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments  of  1972
(the  Act)   made  a  number  of  fundamental  changes in the
approach  to  achieving  clean  water.   One  of  the   most
significant changes was to shift from a reliance on effluent
limitations  related to water quality to a direct control of
effluents  through  the  establishment  of  technology-based
effluent  limitations  to  form  an  additional  basis, as a
minimum, for issuance of discharge permits.

The Act requires EPA to establish guidelines for technology-
based effluent limitations which must be achieved  by  point
sources  of  discharges  into  the  navigable  waters of the
United States.  Section  301 (b)  of  the  Act  requires  the
achievement  by  not  later  than  July  1, 1977 of effluent
limitations for point sources,  other  than  publicly  owned
treatment  works,  which are based on the application of the
BPT as defined by  the  Administrator  pursuant  to  Section
304(b)  of  the  Act.   Section  301(b)   also  requires  the
achievement by not later  than  July  1,  1983  of  effluent
limitations  for  point  sources,  other than publicly owned
treatment works, which are based on the application  of  the
BAT,  resulting  in  progress  toward  the  national goal of
eliminating the discharge of all pollutants,  as  determined
in  accordance  with regulations issued by the Administrator
pursuant to Section 304(b) of the Act.  Section 306  of  the
Act  requires  the  achievement  by  new  sources of federal
standards of performance providing for the  control  of  the
discharge  of pollutants, which reflects the greatest degree
of effluent reduction which the Administrator determines  to
be achievable through the application of the NSPS processes,
operating  methods,  or other alternatives, including, where
practicable,  a  standard   permitting   no   discharge   of
pollutants.

Section  304(b)  of  the  Act  requires the Administrator to
publish  regulations  based  on  the  degree   of   effluent
reduction  attainable through the application of the BPT and
the  best  control  measures   and   practices   achievable,
including   treatment   techniques,  process  and  procedure
innovations, operation methods, and other alternatives.  The
regulations proposed herein set forth  effluent  limitations
and guidelines pursuant to Section 304(b) of the Act for gum
and  wood  chemicals  manufacturing  point  source category.
                               13

-------
Section 304 (c) of the  Act  requires  the  Administrator  to
issue information on the processes, procedures, or operating
methods  which result in the elimination or reduction in the
discharge  of   pollutants   to   implement   standards   of
performance  under Section 306 of the Act.  Such information
is to include technical and other data, including costs,  as
are  available  on  alternative  methods  of  elimination or
reduction of the discharge of pollutants.

Section 306 of the Act reguires  the  Administrator,  within
one  year  after a category of sources is included in a list
published pursuant to Section 306 (b)  (1)  (A) of the Act,  to
propose   regulations   establishing  federal  standards  of
performance for new sources  within  such  categories.   The
Administrator  published  in the Federal Register of January
16, 1973 (38 FR  1624)  a  list  of  27  source  categories.
Publication  of  the  list  constituted  announcement of the
Administrator's intention  of  establishing,  under  Section
306, standards of performance applicable to new sources.

Furthermore, Section 307 (b) provides that:

    1.   The Administrator shall, from time to time, publish
         proposed  regulations   establishing   pretreatment
         standards   for  introduction  of  pollutants  into
         treatment works  (as defined in Section 212 of  this
         Act) which are publicly owned, for those pollutants
         which  are  determined  not  to  be  susceptible to
         treatment by such treatment works  or  which  would
         interfere  with  the  operation  of  such treatment
         works.  Not  later  than  ninety  days  after  such
         publication, and after opportunity for public hear-
         ing,   the   Administrator  shall  promulgate  such
         pretreatment  standards,   Pretreatment   standards
         under  this  subsection  shall   specify  a time for
         compliance not to exceed three years from the  date
         of promulgation and shall be established to prevent.
         the  discharge  of  any  pollutant  through treatment
         works  (as defined in Section 212 of this Act) which
         are  publicly  owned,  which  pollutant  interferes
         with,  passes through, or otherwise is incompatible
         with such works.
    2.   The Administrator shall,   from   time  to  time,  as
         control  technology,  processes, operating methods,
         or   other   alternatives   change,   revise   such
         standards,   following  the procedure established by
         this subsection for promulgation of such standards.
    3.   When proposing  or  promulgating  any  pretreatment
         standard  under   this  section,  the  Administrator
                                14

-------
         shall  designate  the  category  or  categories  of
         sources to which such standard shall apply.
    U.   Nothing  in  this  subsection  shall   affect   any
         pretreatment  reguirement  established by any State
         or local law not in conflict with any  pretreatment
         standard established under this subsection.

In  order  to  insure that any source introducing pollutants
into a publicly owned treatment works, which would be a  new
source  subject  to  Section  306  if  it  were to discharge
pollutants, will not  cause  a  violation  of  the  effluent
limitations  established  for  any such treatment works, the
Administrator  is  required   to   promulgate   pretreatment
standards  for  the  category of such sources simultaneously
with the promulgation  of  standards  of  performance  under
Section  306  for  the  equivalent  category of new sources.
Such pretreatment standards shall prevent the discharge into
such treatment works of any pollutant  which  may  interfere
with,  pass  through, or otherwise be incompatible with such
works.

The Act  defines  a  new  source  to  mean  any  source  the
construction  of which is commenced after the publication of
proposed regulations prescribing a standard of  performance.
Construction  means any placement, assembly, or installation
of facilities or equipment   (including  contractual  obliga-
tions  to  purchase  such  facilities  or  equipment) at the
premises  where  such  equipment  will  be  used,  including
preparation work at such premises.

Methods Used for Development of the Effluent Limitations and
Standards for Performance

The   effluent  limitations,  guidelines  and  standards  of
performance proposed in this document were developed in  the
following manner.  The miscellaneous chemicals manufacturing
point  source  category  was  first  divided into industrial
categories, based on  type  of  manufacturing  and  products
manufactured.   Determination  was  then  made as to whether
further subcategorization would aid in  description  of  the
category.  Such determinations were made on the basis of raw
materials   required,   products   manufactured,   processes
employed, and other factors.

The raw  waste  characteristics  for  each  category  and/or
subcategory were then identified.  This included an analysis
of:   1)  the source and volume of water used in the process
employed and the sources of wastes and  wastewaters  in  the
plant;    and   2)   the  constituents  of  all  wastewaters
(including toxic constituents) which result in taste,  odor.
                             15

-------
and  color  in water or aquatic organisms.  The constituents
of  wastewaters  which  should  be   subject   to   effluent
limitations,  guidelines  and  standards of performance were
identified.

The  full  range  of  control  and  treatment   technologies
existing   within   each  category  and/or  subcategory  was
identified.  This included an identification  of  each  dis-
tinct  control  and treatment technology, including both in-
plant and end- of-pipe technologies, which are  existent  or
capable  of  being  designed  for each subcategory.  It also
included an identification of the effluent  level  resulting
from  the  application  of each of the treatment and control
technologies, in terms of the amount of constituents and  of
the  chemical,  physical,  and biological characteristics of
pollutants.  The problems, limitations, and  reliability  of
each  treatment  and  control  technology  and  the required
implementation time were also identified.  In addition,  the
non-water quality environmental impacts  (such as the effects
of the application of such technologies upon other pollution
problems,  including air, solid waste, radiation, and noise)
were also identified.  The energy requirements  of  each  of
the  control  and treatment technologies were identified, as
well as the cost of the application of such technologies.

The information, as outlined above, was evaluated  in  order
to  determine what levels of technology constituted the BPT,
BAT, and NSPS.  In identifying  such  technologies,  factors
considered   included  the  total  cost  of  application  of
technology in relation to the effluent reduction benefits to
be achieved from such application, the age of equipment  and
facilities  involved,  the process employed, the engineering
aspects of the  application  of  various  types  of  control
techniques, process changes, non-water quality environmental
impact  (including energy requirements), and other  factors.

During  the   initial  phases of the study, an assessment was
made of the availability, adequacy, and  usefulness  of  all
existing data sources.  Data on the identity and performance
of  wastewater  treatment  systems were known to be included
in:

     1.  NPDES permit applications.
     2.  Self-reporting discharge data from various states
           and regions.
     3.  Surveys conducted by trade associations or by
           agencies under research and development  grants.

A preliminary analysis of these data  indicated  an  obvious
need for additional information.
                                16

-------
Additional  data  in  the following areas were required:   1)
process raw waste  load  (RWL)   related  to  production;   2)
currently  practiced  or  potential  in-plant  waste control
techniques; and 3) the identity and effectiveness of end-of-
pipe treatment systems.  The best source of information  was
the  manufacturers  themselves.   Additional information was
obtained from  direct  interviews  and  sampling  visits  to
production facilities.

Collection  of the data necessary for development of RWL and
effluent treatment capabilities within dependable confidence
limits required analysis of both  production  and  treatment
operations.   In  a few cases,  the plant visits were planned
so that the production operations of a single plant could be
studied in association with an end-of-pipe treatment  system
which  receives  only  the wastes from that production.  The
RWL for this plant and associated treatment technology would
fall within a single subcategory.  However, the wide variety
of products manufactured by most of  the  industrial  plants
made this situation rare.

In  the  majority  of  cases,  it  was  necessary  to  visit
facilities where the products manufactured fell into several
subcategories.    The   end-of-pipe   treatment   facilities
received   combined   wastewaters  associated  with  several
subcategories   (several   products,   processes,   or   even
unrelated  manufacturing  operations).   It was necessary to
analyze   separately   the   production    (waste-generating)
facilities  and  the  effluent  (waste treatment) facilities.
This approach required establishment of a common basis,  the
raw  waste  load   (RWL),  for  common  levels  of  treatment
technology for the products within a sutcategory and for the
translation  of  treatment  technology  between   categories
and/or subcategories.

The  selection  of wastewater treatment plants was developed
from identifying information available in the  NPDES  permit
applications,   state  self-reporting  discharge  data,  and
contacts within the manufacturing segment.  Every effort was
made to choose facilities where  meaningful  information  on
both  treatment facilities and manufacturing processes could
be obtained.

Survey teams composed of project  engineers  and  scientists
conducted  the  actual  plant  visits.   Information  on the
identity and performance of wastewater treatment systems was
obtained through:

    1.   Interviews  with  plant  water  pollution   control
         personnel or engineering personnel.
                                 17

-------
    2.   Examination   of   treatment   plant   design   and
         historical  operating data (flow rates and analyses
         of influent and effluent).
    3.   Treatment plant influent and effluent sampling.

Information on process plant operations and  the  associated
RWL Was obtained through:

    1.   Interviews with plant operating personnel.
    2.   Examination of  plant  design  and  operating  data
         (design   specification,  flow  sheets,  day-to-day
         material balances around individual process modules
         or unit operations where possible) .
    3.   Individual   process   wastewater   sampling    and
         analysis.

The  data  base obtained in this manner was then utilized by
the methodology previously described to develop  recommended
effluent    limitations,   guidelines   and   standards   of
performance for the gum  and  wood  chemicals  manufacturing
point  source  category.  All of the references utilized are
included in Section XV of this report.   The  data  obtained
during  the  field  data  collection program are included in
Supplement B.  Cost information is presented  in  Supplement
A.    These  documents  are  available  for  examination  by
interested parties at the EPA Public  Information  Reference
Unit,  Room  2922   (EPA  Library), Waterside Mall, 401 M St.
S.W., Washington, D.C.  20460.

The  following  text  describes  the  scope  of  the  study,
technical   approach   to   the   development   of  effluent
limitations and guidelines, and the scope  of  coverage  for
the data base.

Gum and wood Chemicals

    Scope of the Study

The  gum  and  wood  chemicals  segment  was defined for the
purpose of this study to include those 47 commodities listed
under SIC  (Standard  Industrial  Classification)  2861.   It
should  be  noted,  however,  that  the  list  contains some
anomalies with regard to manufacturing activities in the gum
and wood chemicals category, including the following:

     1.   The list contains some 20 natural tanning materials
         and dye stuffs which are  of  minor  importance  in
         U.S.   manufacturing   activities   in   terms   of
         production guantities or dollar value added by  the
         manufacture.   The  majority  of  these  materials,
                               18

-------
         particularly the extracts,  are imported to the  U.S.
         for distribution,  and therefore represent little or
         no manufacturing activity,
    2.    Many  of   the   products   listed   represent    old
         technology,    particularly   hardwood  distillation.
         The  products  associated  with  the  recovery   and
         processing of pyroligneous  acid have been displaced
         from   the  market,   and thus  from  manufacturing
         activity,  by cheaper synthetic substitute products.
         Compounds  which are  contained in pyroligneous   acid
         include   acetate   of   lime   (natural),  acetone
         (natural), calcium  acetate  (product  of  hardwood
         distillation)    ethyl   acetate  (natural) ,  methyl
         acetate (natural), and  methyl  alcohol  (natural).
         Also,   the   technology   for   manufacturing   pit
         charcoal,  while still employed in some parts of the
         world, is  no longer  employed in the United States.
    3.    Crude tall oil, except skimmings, is a  product  of
         the  Kraft  (sulfate)   wood  fiber pulping process.
         The manufacture of this  material  is  an  integral
         part  of   the  sulfate  process  and  therefore the
         associated wastewater production, if any, would  be
         intricately  contained in Kraft manufacturing's raw
         waste load (RWL).  In actual practice,  crude   tall
         oil  is  usually  shipped  to  fractionation plants
         which produce tall oil rosin, turpentine and pitch.
         It is this fractionation step which is included  in
         this study.
    4.    Rosins, produced by  the distillation of pine gum or
         pine wood, have historically been used with varying
         success  as  a  principal  ingredient  of  numerous
         products,    such   as   printing   inks,  linoleum,
         varnishes,  electrical  insulation,  foundry   core
         oils,   leather,  adhesives,  masonry,  and  solder
         fluxes.  However, since 1949, gum rosin  production
         has  decreased  and   wood  rosin  markets have  been
         limited by the competition  of tall oil  rosin.    In
         addition,   most of the rosins sold today are either
         thermally or chemically modified derivatives  which
         have  improved  applications  both in older markets
         and recently developed markets.

The product list under SIC 2861 was  developed by the United
States  Department  of  Commerce  and is oriented toward the
collection of economic data  related  to  gross  production,
sales,  and  unit costs.  The SIC list is not related to the
true nature of the manufacturing in  terms  of  actual  plant
operations,  production,  or   considerations associated with
water pollution control.  As  such, the list does not provide
a definitive set of boundaries for  study  of  the  effluent
                              19

-------
limitations  for  the  gum  and wood chemicals manufacturing
point source category.

It should be noted that, even  though  this  study  did  not
concern the management of forests, timber harvesting, or the
production  of  pulp  via  the  Kraft pulping process, these
areas of endeavor are included to provide  an  understanding
of   the   interrelationships   of   activities  within  the
manufacturing segment as well as those which  are  essential
to  the  supply  of  the  necessa'ry  raw  materials  to  the
manufacturers.  During the course of the  study,  six  major
production areas were identified for in-depth study:

    1,   Char  and  charcoal   briquet   manufacturing   via
         carbonization of hardwood and softwood scraps.
    2.   Gum rosin and turpentine  manufacturing  via  steam
         distillation  of  gum  from longleaf and slash pine
         trees.
    3.   Wood rosin, turpentine, and  pine  oil  manufacture
         via  the  solvent extraction and steam distillation
         of resinous material from old wood stumps  obtained
         from cut over pine forests.
    4.   Tall oil rosins, fatty acids, and pitch  production
         via  the  fractionation  of  crude  tall oil, a by-
         product of the Kraft pulping process.
    5.   Essential oils production via steam distillation of
         coniferous  wood  fines   from   select   lumbering
         operations.
    6.   Rosin  derivatives  manufacture  via  chemical   or
         thermal  modifications  of either tall oil, gum, or
         wood rosins.

    Scope of Coverage for Data Base

According to the  1972 Census of Manufacturers, there are  135
establishments  engaged   in   the   primary   manufacturing
activities    of   SIC   2861   products   and   discharging
approximately 19  billion  gallons  of  wastewater  per  year
according  to the 1967 Census of Manufacturers, Water Use in
Manufacturing.

These establishments  were  responsible  for  total  product
value   shipments  totaling $226 million, or 76 percent of the
total   $296.3  million  worth  of  gum  and  wood   chemical
products.  The remaining products are produced in facilities
primarily  engaged in other manufacturing activities.  Table
III-1 presents a  breakdown of product value  shipped by major
manufacturers as  established by this study.   It  should  be
noted   that  the  reported value  of the product shipped does
not necessarily represent a level of manufacturing activity.
                               20

-------
               CO
               3
               ro
                  c
                  CO
                  o
                  !_
                  (U
                 O_
 VO
  CM
        OO

         CM
                               oo
                                r--
                                rr\
                  O

                  cn
                                                                                                LA
                                          vo o
                                                         LA
                                                                    .- \D

                                                                    -4" CM
                                                                              r-.

                                                                              vO
                                                                  CM  CM J"

                                                                  J-"  CM' J-'
                                                                  3-  LA
                                                                                                           00
                                                                                                                  CM
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  o
                                                                                                                                                 VD
                                                                                                                                                 O
                                                                                                                                                 ro
                                                                    J-     vo     ro

                                                                    LA     cn    vo
                                                                              I    cn
                                                                              I    CM
                                co
                                                                   TJ
                                                                    CO
                                                                                                TJ
                                                                                                CO
                                                                                     TJ
                                                                                     CO
                                                                            TJ
                                                                            CO
              4-1
               C
               ro
                  to
                  co
                  c
                  O
3

ro
                        o
                        o
                         urv
                                o
                                CL
                                co
                                Cd
         O
         Z
                                ro
                                Q
                                                                   O
                                                                   Q.
                                                                   (U
                                                                   o:
    o o  o
    LA LA LA
                                           .- .- CO
                                          J" i— CM
O
LA
                                                         CO
                                                                       00
                                             ro
                                            o
                                                        o
                                                        Q.
                                                        0)
                                                        aC
                                                                               (D
                                        to
                                        o
                                                          o
                                                          Q.
                                                          
           \O cf\ ro
           LA PO Q
                                                   o
                                                   Q.
                                                   co
                                                   a:
                       o
                      z
                       ro
                                                   ro
                                                   a
                                     o
                                     a.
                                     co
 o
z

 ro
 4-1

O
 O
 3
TJ
 O

O-

TJ
 C
 to


 o
 O
 3
TJ
 O
CM
tj)
•M
0)
3
CT
"
CO

01
c
•—
TJ
3
r—
O
c
«—
^— •*
CM
(/>
^~
•—
0
..^
ro
•—
4J
C
CO
I/)
in
LD

TJ
C
ro
TJ
a)
^»
^^
•—
V)
*.
a

E
ro
CO
4->
to
"^^
TJ
CO
4-1
                         s_
                         ro
  TJ
  o
  o

  TJ

  ro
  T:
                                ro

                               o

                               TJ
                                O
                                 o
                                to
                        co
                        c
                        c
                    C  CO
                    —  a.
                    m  s-
                    o  3
                    cn
                                             co
                                             c
                                                                to
                                              H-  O
                                           TJ TJ
                                               O
                                               O
                                           >-/

                                           8
           (1)
           C
                  -Q
                   3
                  to
        ro
       z
           c
           CO  C
           Q- —

           3  O
           I- <*•
in
in
CO
O
o
»_
a.

4->
<4-
ro
i_
^

E
O
l_
14-

p_
• _
o

^







(/)
c
*—
t/)
CO


TJ
C
ro

in
c
•_
in
O
rV


TJ
CO
•—
M-
• —
0
CO
a.
m

4^
O
c

in
4-*
O
3
TJ
O
i_
a.
                                                                                 0)

                                                                                 ro  m
                                                                                 2:  co
                                                                                     u
                                                                                 cn 3
                                                                                 c  4->
                                                                                 —  X
                                                                                 CO —
JQ
 3
to
 O
to
           E  E
           3  3
        E  C3 CJ
        3
          ro
                          ro
                                                                                                                  TJ
                                                                                                                  co
o
co
D.
to
                                     o
                                    z
                                                                                                                          ro
                                                                                                                                   CO
                                                                                                                                   u
                                                                                                                                   3
                                                                                                                                   4->
                                                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                                                   ro
                                                                                                                                  M-
                                                                                                                                   3
                                                                                                                                   C
                                                                                                                                   ro
                                                                                                                                   C
                                                                                                                                   CO
                                                                                                                                  CM
                                                                                                                                  r-.
                                                                                                                                  cr»
                                                                                                                                       TJ
                                                                                                                                        co
                                                                                                                                        !_
                                                                                                                                        CO

                                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                                        0)
                                                                                                                                        c
                                                                                                                                        CO
                                                                                                                                        3
                                                                                                                                        in
                                                                                                                                        c
                                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                                                         ro
                                                                                                                                        O
                                                                                                                                        CO

                                                                                                                                        cn
              o
              a
              co

              ro
              o
              .a
              3
              to
                                                                                             O  O
                                                                                                                                  TJ
                                                                                                                                   (U
                                                                                                                  in
                                                                                                                  co
                                                                                                                 TJ
                                                                                                                  3

                                                                                                                  O
                                                                                                                  C
                                                                                                                                   a)
                                                                                                                                   Q   -
                                                                                                                                 r-   CM
                                                     21

-------
     CC

     C/5
     3
     Q
     Z

     CO
     o

     ^
     UJ
     I
     o
     Q
     O
     O
LU   (3

—.   I—

W   2
2   LU
u    CO

     CC
     Q.
     CO
     CL

     I
     CO

     o

     H-
     LU
     CC
     cc
     UJ
     \-
LU
H
>
s •*
a
z
^ CHARCOAL
BRIQUETS
ROS
ROLIGNEOUS
ID
	 ^4 BRIQUETTING
Q. < Z
yo
$
N
Z
O
00
cc
<
o


•
cc
o
CO
2°
III -
CC CC £0
« I
III-
1
cc
UJ
CO
s
p
Q
o
ib
Q LU
CC CC
< o
I LL
LU
frt "• ^
LU ^) ^^
tf < ** *•
co E z
O uj  & m
5&|
< o —
I CO \-
J
UJ
00
p
Q
o
Ife
oS
00 LL



1
z
<7
c
cc
i
c
1
	 ^ GUM TURPENTINE
, — »J 	 ^ TALL OIL ROSIN
i '
I I
. 0
c t
. Q-
J -J
j o
J _l
J _J
c <
- 1-
li
1 I
5 1
"- LU fe 0
- 	 U.
'
LL^- LUMBER j
•
EXUDATE (FROM LIVE TREES) |

' J
O
t-
LU
Q
D
CC
00
UJ V

1
i
•• SULFATE TURPENTINE
1-0 f |
> = CD $ _i ;
£* t|g j
S2 52E ^i
BOUNDARY
NOT INCLUC

OLD
TREE
STUMPS WOOD PULP •*
1
i
	 ** 	 »»• WOOD ROSIN
	 »- WOOD TURPENTINE
	 ^ PINE OIL
L
! ill
CJ I— i—
4. 
-------
For example, the $5.4 million value for natural tanning  and
dyeing   materials  and  chrome  tanning  mixtures  is  more
probably representative of a  wholesaling  operation  rather
than actual manufacturing.

To   help   quantify   the  problem,  only  14  of  the  135
establishments   primarily   engaged   in   production    of
commodities  listed  under  SIC  2861 have applied for NPDES
discharge applications.  Seven of those 14  facilities  were
surveyed   during   the  course  of  this  study  and  three
additional facilities were requested to  supply  information
and  data  via the U.S. Mail.  Another three of the fourteen
were charcoal plants  that  have  no  discharge  of  process
wastewater  pollutants.   A pilot study in the 14th plant is
available.  This  study  was  preformed  by  an  independent
consultant, AWARE, Inc.
                            23

-------
                         SECTION IV

                 INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIZATION
The  purpose  of  this  study is the development of effluent
limitations and guidelines for the gum  and  wood  chemicals
segment  that  will be commensurate with different levels of
in-plant waste reduction and end-of-pipe  pollution  control
technology.    These  effluent  limitations  and  guidelines
specify  the  quantity  of  pollutants  which  are   to   be
discharged  from  a  specific  facility and are related to a
common yardstick for the manufacturing segment, the quantity
of produc ti on.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

         Discussion of the Rationale of Categorization

In developing effluent limitations, guidelines and standards
of performance for gum and wood chemicals manufacturing,  it
was  necessary  to determine whether significant differences
existed within the segment which could be used  as  a  basis
for  subcategorization in order to define those areas of the
segment where separate effluent limitations, guidelines  and
standards    of   performance   should   apply.    A   final
subcategorization   was   developed   based    on    product
differences:

          A.  Char and charcoal briquets.
          B.  Gum rosin and gum turpentine.
          C.  Wood rosin, resin turpentine, and pine oil.
          D.  Tall oil rosin, pitch, and fatty acids.
          E.  Essential oils.
          F.  Rosin derivatives.

The  following  factors  were  considered in determining the
subcategorization  that  would  be   most   meaningful   for
developing effluent limitations, guidelines and standards of
performance:

              Manufacturing Process

The process steps by which gum, wood, tall oil chemicals and
essential  oils  are  produced  are  similar  in  that steam
distillation  is   employed   for   separating   the   major
constituents.    wood   chemical  production  processes  are
somewhat different in that solvent extraction  is  employed.
The  production  of  charcoal and rosin-fcased derivatives is
different   from   the   other   processes   because   steam
                                25

-------
distillation  is  not employed.   Charcoal is a carbonization
or   destructive   distillation   product   whereas    rosin
derivatives  are  products  of chemical reactions.   Based on
these  distinct  differences,  the  manufacturing  processes
employed    for    these    products   are   a   basis   for
subcategorization.

              Product

The  major  products  presented  above   are   significantly
different.   The  essential  oils  are chemically related to
turpentine.  However, their  product  yield,  based  on  raw
materials,  is  about one percent because there is no market
for the spent wood, while the total product yields  for  gum
and  wood  rosins approach 100 and 25 percent, respectively,
on a clean raw-materials basis.   Thus, it would  not  appear
justifiable  to  group essential oils production with gum or
wood chemicals because of  differences  in  product  make-up
yield.    Therefore,   product   type   is   a   basis   for
subcategorization.
              Raw Materials

The basic raw materials for each
subcategories are as follows:
     of  the  proposed  product
     Product

     Char and
     Charcoal Briquets

     Gum Rosin and
     Turpentine

     Wood Rosin,
     Turpentine, and
     Pine Oil

     Tall Oil Rosin,
     Pitch, and Fatty
     Acids

     Essential Oils
     Rosin  Derivatives
Raw Material Source

Hardwood and softwood
scraps

Crude gum from the
sapwood of living trees

Wood stumps and other
resinous woods from cut
over forest

By-product crude tall oil
from the Kraft process
Scrap wood fines, twigs,
barks, or roots of select
woods or plants

Rosin products from gum,
wood, and tall oil chemicals
                              26

-------
Variation  in  raw  materials  can  be  expected within each
group.  For example, seasonal changes bring about changes in
crude gum composition.  Late in the  growing  season,  crude
gum   is   termed  scrape,  which  generally  contains  less
turpentine and more trash.

However, variations in quality can be expected  in  the  raw
material  stocks within any of the groups.  Where variations
in raw materials reguire additional  processing  to  achieve
product  quality,  it is probable that additional waste will
be generated.  For purposes of this  study  these  ancillary
refining  processes  can be classified into groups according
to the type of waste  they  generate   (i.e.,  wet  or  dry).
Filtration  and  adsorption  processes, which generate semi-
solid waste disposed of in landfills, are classified as  dry
wastes.   Acid  treating  and  solvent  extraction processes
generate a liquid waste and therefore are classified as  wet
wastes.   The  solvent,  however,  is normally recovered for
reuse.

Dilute acid treatment (acidulation) is commonly employed  to
remove  odor  and  color bodies and can be expected to yield
higher  raw  waste  loads  per  unit  of  production.    The
prevalence  of acidulation of raw materials, the quantity of
specific pollutants generated, and the impact of dry  versus
wet  refining  methods  on  the final products and resulting
RWL's appears to be a function of product  type.   Based  on
the above discussion, it is concluded that raw materials are
a basis for subcategorization.

              Plant Size

Operations  in gum and wood chemicals manufacturing range in
size from intermittent batch operations, which are  operated
by  a  handful of personnel, to large complexes which employ
hundreds of personnel.  Water use management techniques  are
affected by economy of scale, as well as other factors, such
as  geographical  location.   On  the  other  hand,  smaller
operations may have waste treatment  and  disposal  options,
such as retention, land spreading, and trucking to landfill,
that are impractical  for large-scale operations.

Plant  size  has  not been observed to have an impact on the
quantity and characteristics of the  wastewater,  therefore,
plant size is not considered a basis for subcategorization.

              Plant Age

Plant age is net considered as a basis for subcategorization
in   itself  because  the  manufacturers  have  continuously
                               27

-------
                                                      I  I  I
                                                          (0
28

-------
                           Table IV - -1
                     Statistics by Geographical Areas
Geographical Area


Northeast Region
Value added by Manufacturer
$fO>Percent
 4.8
North Central Region    13.6

South Region           129.6

West Region              6.1
 3.1

 8.8

84.1

 4.0
                Establi shments
                Number Percent
22


40

68

 5
16.3

29.6

50.4

 3.7
                       154.1
                   100.0
                                                             135
                                             100.0
Source:    1972 Census of Manufacturing
                              29
                                           4/30/76

-------
upgraded and modernized their operations as dictated by  the
competitive  market.   Equipment is modernized as it becomes
necessary, so that the actual age of a  production  facility
could not be determined accurately.  Furthermore, the actual
age  of the equipment does not necessarily affect wastewater
generation.  Operation and maintenance of the equipment  are
more important factors.

              Plant Location

According  to  the  1972 Census of Manufacturers, half of the
establishments in gum  and  wood  chemicals  production  are
located  in  the  southern states  (see Table IV-1), and they
produced over 84 percent of the segment's output in terms of
dollar value added to the raw material.  9556 of today's  gum
turpentine and rosin is produced in Georgia and Florida.

Plant  location,  and  specifically  local  climate,  has an
impact on the performance of certain end-of-pipe  wastewater
treatment  systems,  e.g.,  aerated  lagoons  and  activated
sludge, but because 8H% of the industries output is from the
same region and because treatment systems should be designed
for the climate in which it will be operated, plant location
is not a basis for  subcategorization.

              Air Pollutien Control Technology

Air  pollution  is  not  a  major  problem  in   any  of  the
manufacturing  activities  in  the  six  product  groupings.
Particulate  emissions  were  observed  to  be  a  potential
problem  in  pneumatic  conveyance  systems.  However, these
emissions can be controlled with more efficient  dry  cyclone
separators.   This  will  not have any appreciable impact on
wastewater generation.

Two plants that manufactured rosin derivatives were  visited
during  the field  survey.  One of  the plants vented the non-
condensables to the atmosphere, and no significant impact on
pollutant loading  per  unit of production was observed.   The
total  quantity  of non-condensable organics vented was very
small.

A fugitive dust problem was observed at a char and  charcoal
production  unit.   The  existing  control methods employed  a
water spray, but quantities were not sufficient  to  cause   a
surplus   water problem.  It is anticipated  that  the ultimate
solution  of the  fugitive  dust  problem  would  involve  an
improved  materials-handling  system  and the elimination of
dust-wetting techniques.
                                 30

-------
Legend
                            Table IV  -2

                   Comparison of Raw Waste Loads
                        By Product Grouping
Product ion
                                RWL Characteristics
Flow
 BOD
 COD
TSS
 Oil
Char and
Charcoal

Gum Rosin and
Turpentine

Wood Ros i n,
Turpentine,
Pine Oil

Tall Oil
Fractionation
Products

Essential Oils

Rosin
Derivative
Zero
 N/A


 XXX


 XXX



 XXX



XXXX

 XXX
 N/A


 XXX


XXXX



 XXX



XXXX

 XXX
N/A
                               XX
                               XX

                                X
 N/A


 XX


 XX



XXX



  X

 XX
Flow            *     .£100 Gallons/1,000 Ibs. Product
                **      100 to 1,000 Gallons/1,000 Ibs. Product
                ***     1,000 Gallons/1,000 Ibs. Products

Other RWL's     X     £. 0. I lb./l,000 Ibs. Product
                XX      0.1 to 1.0 Ib./l.OOO  Ibs. Product
                XXX     1.0 to 10.0 Ibs./I,000 Ibs. Product
                XXXX   >10.0 Ibs./I,000 Ibs.  Product
                            31
                                          4/30/76

-------
In conclusion, air pollution is controlled in  the  gum  and
wood  chemicals  segment  by dry mechanical devices and wet-
scrubbing units which do not significantly affect wastewater
loading  or  characteristics.   Therefore,   air   pollution
control technology is not a basis for subcategorization.

              Solid Waste Disposal

Significant quantities of solid residue are generated in the
manufacturing   processes   of   charcoal,  gum,  wood,  and
essential oil production.  Spent wood fines  are  the  major
fraction   of   the  solids  from  wood  rosin,  turpentine,
essential oils, and pine  oil  production.   In  both  cases
these  wood fines are fed to boilers, where the residual BTU
value of the fines is used to generate  steam.   The  solids
which  are  generated  in  the  production  of gum rosin and
turpentine include the trash  contained  in  the  crude  gum
material  plus  filter aid material which may be employed in
the  filtration  of  the  melted  crude  gum.   Filter   aid
materials are also known to be used for the product refining
of  oil  of  cedarwood.   The  use  of  filtration  aids  or
adsorbent materials, such as powdered activated carbon,  for
refining  final  or  intermediate  products is common to all
product categories.  Such solids are normally disposed of in
sanitary landfills.

The handling and final disposal of solid  wastes  which  are
generated in the gum and wood chemicals segment has not been
observed   to   have   an   impact   on   the   quantity  or
characteristics of the wastewater.  Therefore,  solid  waste
generation, handling, or disposal is not a basis for subcat-
egorization.

         Wastewater  Quantities.,.  Characteristics,  Control,
         and Treatment

Table IV-2 shows the relative variation  in  the  wastewater
quantities  and  pollutants  per  unit  of  production.   In
reviewing the table, some similarities in the pertinent  RWL
parameters   are   apparent;  however,  the  variations  are
significant enough to support the categorization.

The control and treatment of wastewaters  for  each  of  the
product  categories  is  discussed  in  Section  VII of this
document.  Variations in the  proposed  treatment  concepts,
though  not  totally  dissimilar,  will  provide  additional
justification for the proposed subcategorization.

         Summary of Considerations
                                 32

-------
                                    Table  IV   -3

                        Factors Considered for  Basis of Gum
                            and Wood  Chemicals  Segment
                                  Subcategorization

                        	Proposed  Subcategorization
                                                Wood          Ros i n,
                                   Gum           Rosin,        Pitch,
                      Char, and    Rosin,        Turpentine    and         Essen-    Rosin,
                      Charcoal     and           and           Fatty       tial      Deriva-
 Factors               Briquets     Turpentine    Pine  Oil      Acids       Oi Is      tives
Manufacturing
Process
Product
Raw Material
Plant Size
Plant Location
Air Po11u t i on Con t ro1
Technology
Solid Waste Disposal
Operations
Wastewater Quantities
Character!sties,
Control,  and
Treatment
Legend

X denotes a contributing factor for categorization
- denotes factor was considered not pertinent for categorization

                                       33                                   4/30/76

-------
For  the  purpose  of  establishing  effluent   limitations,
guidelines   and  standards,  the  gum  and  wood  chemicals
manufacturing point source category should be subcategorized
by major product grouping.  Table IV-3 provides a summary of
the factors considered for subcategorization.   The  factors
which   were   significant   in  developing  the  basis  for
subcategorization include:

          1.  Production Processes.
          2.  Product Types and Yields.
          3.  Raw Material Sources.
          4.  Wastewater Quantities, Characteristics,
              Control, and Treatment.

As Table IV-3 shows, the five other  factors  also  examined
did  not  justify  further  subcategorization  based  on the
observations made throughout this study.

         Description of Subcategories

              Subcategory A - Char and Charcoal Briquets

Plants included under Subcategory A are those engaged in the
manufacture of  char  and  charcoal  briquets,  as  well  as
pyroligneous  acids  and  other  by-products.  Presently, no
pyroligneous acids are  known  to  be  manufactured  in  the
United States.  Char and charcoal from hardwood and softwood
distillation are economically the most important products in
the  gum  and wood chemicals segment.  Char and charcoal are
produced by the carbonization of wood, which is the  thermal
decomposition  cf  raw  wood.   See  Figure  IV-a  for plant
locations.

              Subcateqory B - Gum Rosin and Turpentine

Plants included under Subcategory B are those engaged in the
manufacture of guir rosin and turpentine by the  distillation
of crude gum.  Gum rosin and turpentine products make up 2.3
percent  of  the  total  product  value for the gum and wood
chemicals   segment,  according  to  the   1972   Census   of
Manufacturers.   High lafcor costs for  gum collection and the
development of less costly  substitute  products have caused  a
decline  in  the  value  of  product   shipments   in   this
Subcategory.   The  plants  which  were  visited during this
study operated only on intermittent schedules.

     Subcategory c: - Wood  Rosin, Turpentine and Pine Oil

Plants included under Subcategory C  are  those  engaged  in
manufacturing  wood   rosin,  turpentine and  pine oil.  These
                                 34

-------
                                                             <2
                                                             I CC
                                                             O CD
                                                                           ro
z
£
LU 0
o
£C
CQ

Z
3 s.
CC
Q


                                                              5
                                                              o

                                                              t
                                           C3



                                           OC


                                           S '
                                           Z I
35

-------
industries use solvent extraction and steam distillation  as
their   manufacturing   processes,  and  their  typical  raw
materials are resinous wood stumps.  These products  account
for  19  percent  of  the  total product value for the total
industry, according to the  1972  Census  of  Manufacturers.
The  economic  life of this subcategory is limited by a lack
of available raw materials  near  existing  plants  and  the
development of economically competitive processes.

              Subcategory  D  -  Tall Oil Rosin, Fatty Acids
              and Pitch

Plants  included  under  Subcategory  D  are   those   which
manufacture  tall  oil  rosin,  fatty  acids,  and  pitch by
fractionation of Kraft process crude tall oil.   The  growth
of  tall  oil refining has been unabated since the inception
of modern technology in 1949.  Technology for the production
of high-purity tall oil rosin  and  fatty  acids  is  fairly
recent.   Modern  fractionation techniques yield fatty acids
and rosins with very low cross-product contamination.

              Subcategory E - Essential Oils

Plants included under Subcategory E are those  manufacturing
essential  oils,  which  consist  of terpenes, hydrocarbons,
alchols, or ketones.  Most essential oils are  insoluble  in
water   and   are   volatile   enough  to  be  recovered  by
distillation.

              Subcategory j[ - Rosin Derivatives

Plants  included  under  Sutcategory  F  are   those   which
manufacture  the  rosin derivatives: esters, adduct modified
esters,  and  alkyds.   These  are  produced   by   chemical
reactions   involving   rosins,   monohydric  or  polyhydric
alcohol,  and  chemical  modifiers.   Most  of  the   rosins
produced in the United States are actually rosin derivatives
and  modified  derivative products.  That is, the rosins are
modified to eliminate undesirable properties and to  enhance
their application in many manufacturing processes.

         Process Descriptions

The following pages in this section contain a profile of the
findings  made  during  field   surveys  of  the gum and wood
chemicals manufacturing point source category.  The profiles
contain typical process  flow   schematic  diagrams,  grouped
according   to   the   proposed   subcategorization  of  the
manufacturers.
                               36

-------
              Subcategory A - Char and Charcoal Briquets

Char or charcoal is produced by the carbonization  of  wood,
which  is  the  thermal  decomposition of the raw wood.  The
product  yield  and  purity  are  a  function  of  the  kiln
temperature.   Above 270°C, exothermic reactions set in, and
the process can be self-sustaining with the rate of  carbon-
ization  normally controlled by limiting the air feed to the
kiln.  Higher temperature reactions produce a higher  carbon
content  product  but  reduce the product yield.  During the
decomposition of the wood, distillates are formed and  leave
the  kiln  with the flue gases.  The condensable distillates
are collectively referred to  as  pyroligneous  acid,  which
contains  methanol,  acetic  acid,  acetone, tars, oils, and
water.  These materials have steadily declined  in  economic
importance because of cheaper methods of producing synthetic
substitutes;   therefore,   most  plants  have  discontinued
recovery of the  by-products  from  the  pyroligneous  acid.
Instead,  the  distillate and other flue gases are fed to an
afterburner for thermal destruction before  the  flue  gases
are   exhausted   to   the   atmosphere.    The  condensable
distillates may also be recycled as fuel  for  the  kiln  or
recycled  in  the  vapor  phase as a fuel supply supplement.
The non-condensable gases contain CO2, CO, CH4, H2 and  some
higher  hydrocarbons.   The composition of the gases depends
on the distillation temperature.

A typical  flow  diagram  for  char  and  charcoal  briquets
manufacturing  is  illustrated  in Figure IV-1.  During this
study,  no  facilities  which  recovered  distillation   by-
products were known to exist in the United States.  The kiln
depicted  in  Figure IV-1 is loaded with a payloader.  After
the kiln is loaded, the wood is set  afire  and  allowed  to
burn under controlled conditions for approximately 72 hours.
The  air for oxidation is then cut off and water injected in
the kiln for quenching.  Approximately 18 hours is  required
for  the material to cool down; afterwards, it is removed by
a payloader.  Pine wood char is sold at this  point  in  the
process  to  fill  specialized  orders.   Hardwood  char  is
ground, then blended with starch binder and water  for  feed
to  the  briqueting  operation.   The resulting briquets are
dried and packaged in bags for sale.

The off gases from the furnaces contain  compounds  such  as
acetic  acid,  methanol,  acetone,  tars,  and  oils.  These
materials are presently oxidized in the  afterburners.   The
natural   gas  fuel  required  for  the  afterburners  is  a
significant operating cost.  An alternative emission control
is now under consideration, in  which  off  gases  from  the
furnace  would  be  scrubbed to remove the condensables from
                              37

-------
                                                   DC
                                                   O

                                                   <
                                                   CC
                                                   Q
                                                   >-
                                                   I
                                                   LU
                                                   a
                                                             CC
                                                             UJ
                                                             CO
                                                             <
                                                                                                                                             ro
                                           CC
                                           o
                                           a.
                                           LU
                                           CO

O
r>
Q
O
QC
a.
LU

                                                                  LU
                                                                  CDS
                                                                 ,CC<
                                                                 '< LU
                                                                 |Q- I-
                                                                 WCO CO
                                                                                                        DC)
                                                                                                        LUl
                                                                                                        I-I

                                                                                                        
-------
the flue gases.  The resulting scrubber liquor would be sent
to  a  separator  where  the  pyroligneous  acid  could   be
recovered.   The water and soluble compounds would be reused
in the scrubber system.  The separated products can then  be
recovered for sale or used as an auxiliary fuel.

              Subcategory B - Gum Rosin and Turpentine

Figure  IV-2  illustrates  a  process flow schematic for the
manufacture of gum rosin and turpentine.  The crude gum  raw
material is obtained by gum farmers who collect the gum from
scarified longleaf and slash pine trees.  The plant receives
raw  crude  gum  from  the  gum  farmers  in  435-lb  barrel
shipments.   These  shipments  contain  some  dirt,   water,
leaves, bark, and other miscellaneous trash.  Gum is emptied
into  a  vat  by  inverting  the crude gum containers over a
high-pressure steam jet.  The melter liquefies the crude gum
material, and recycled turpentine is  added  to  reduce  the
viscosity.   This  mixture  is  filtered  through a pressure
filter and collected.  The trash is periodically removed and
hauled to a landfill.  The filtered gum is then washed  with
water.   Because  iron  and  calcium  causes  gum  rosin  to
discolor at high temperature, a small amount of oxalic  acid
may  be  added  to  the wash water to precipate the iron and
calcium as an insoluble oxalate.   The  wash  water  removes
soluble   acids   and   oxalate  precipitate,  and  is  then
discharged for treatment.  The prepared crude  gum  material
is then distilled to separate the turpentine.

Non-contact  shell-and-tube steam heating and sparging steam
are used in the stills.  Turpentine and water are  distilled
overhead  and condensed with shell-and-tube condensers.  The
water is separated from the  turpentine  in  the  downstream
receivers  as  shown in Figure IV-2.  The turpentine product
is dried with a sodium chloride salt dehydrator, and the gum
rosin  is  removed  from  the   still   after   each   batch
distillation in a fluid state and packaged.

    Subcategory C - Wood Rosin, Turpentine, and Pine Qil

The  raw  material  for this process is stumps obtained from
the cut over pine forests of  the  southern  United  States.
The  stumps  are uprooted by bulldozers and freighted to the
extraction plant on railroad flat cars.

Figure IV-3 is a  flow  schematic  diagram  of  the  solvent
extraction/ steam distillation plant which was surveyed.
The
are
 pine stumps from 40- to 60-year-old longleaf pine trees
brought into the plant.   The  stumps  are  placed  on  a
                                39

-------
        oc
        I-
        x
        0
        O
        cc
EC
D

O
        Q
        O
        O

-------
conveyor  and  are  washed  with  1,000  gpm  of  water at a
pressure of approximately 110 psi.   The water and dirt  flow
to  a settling pond where the dirt settles out and the water
is recycled back to the washing operation.  The  accumulated
dirt  is  periodically  removed  to  landfill.   Wood  hogs,
chippers and shredders mechanically reduced the wood  stumps
in  size  in  a  sequence  operation until they become chips
approximately 2" in length and 1/16" thick.  These chips are
placed into intermediate storage.  The wood chips are fed to
a battery of retort extractors.  The extraction  process  is
accomplished in sequential steps as follows:

    1.   Water is  removed  from  the  chips  by  azeotropic
         distillation with a water-immiscible solvent.
    2.   The resinous material is extracted  from  the  wood
         chips with a water-immiscible solvent.
    3.   Residual solvent is removed  from  the  spent  wood
         chips by steaming.

After  the final step, the spent wood chips are removed from
the retort and sent to the boilers as fuel.  During steps  1
and 3, the steam solvent azeotrope from the retorts proceeds
to  an  entrainment  separator.   Any  entrained  wood fines
coming from the  retorts  are  removed  in  the  entrainment
separator  and  are used in the furnace as fuel.  The vapors
from the entrainment separator are condensed and proceed  to
one  or  more  separators  where  the  solvent-water mixture
separates.  The solvent is recycled for use in the retorts.

The extract liquor leaving the  retorts  during  step  2  is
placed  into  intermediate  storage  tanks  prior to further
processing.  The contents of  these  tanks  are  sent  to  a
distillation   column  to  separate  the  solvent  from  the
products.  The column is operated  under  vacuum  conditions
maintained  by  a  steam-jet ejector.  The overhead from the
column is condensed and enters a separator  where  condensed
solvent  is  removed and recycled to the retorts.  The vapor
phase from the separator, along  with  the  steam  from  the
ejector,  is  condensed  in  a  shell-and-tube exchanger and
enters a separator.  Here  the  remaining  solvent  and  the
condensed steam from the ejector are separated.  The solvent
is sent to recycle and water to treatment.

The bottoms stream from the first distillation column enters
a second distillation column, also operated under vacuum, as
shown  in  Figure IV-3.  Steam is introduced into the bottom
of the tower to strip  off  the  volatile  compounds.   This
overhead stream enters a condenser and separator.  A portion
of  the  condensed  liquor  phase  is  refluxed  back to the
distillation column, while most of it  is  stored  as  crude
                                 41

-------
                                             D
                                             UJ



                                             
                                                    CO
                                                                               CO
                                                                               O

                                                                               o
                                             "-  <  o

                                             O  >  O
                                             h-  LU  O
                                                                                                                                                           o
                                                                                                                                                           ro
•?


>


UJ

DC

D

O
LU

CC

Q
O
U
D
<\L
> -5







s
D
§s

r~f-j
CO ,






— -C
s T
< ^^ 7
I ~T~
1
1 	



H >
^f=
3^ "•=:
«2 = S
_ a. _i j-
O < o co
OLU > o >
H-CC LU O <"
i
^ >«« ^
Us ^

o
	 r^




i




















^ ^
o
_l
_l
<
^. 1-
Q
Z 2
LL CO
LU O
cc-tc







E      £
                                                               *
                                                              < UJ h-
                                                              -1 ~> CO
                                                              D ^ >
                                                              o I- co
                                                              = < O
                                                              o > o
                                                              I- LU O
                                                                                     ol  CC
                                                                                     -I  UJ
                                                                                     <  °-
                                                                                     a.  O
                                          <
                                          LU ___
                                       K
                                    < UJ H
                                    > -> CO
CC.
O

                                                                                                      y
                                                           co  <
                                                                                   p    I

                                                                                   I  CC <•
                                                                                   d  < UJ
                                                                                   (-0.1-
                                                                                   CO  CO CO
                                                                                     Q <
                                                                                     _ LU
                                                                                     O QC

                                                                                     < I-
                                                                                                cc
                                                                                                LU
                                                                             UJ
                                                                             Q
                                                                             O
                                                                             DC
                                                                             O
                                                               42

-------
terpene  for  further processing.  The steam from the vacuum
ejector and the vapor phase from the separator are condensed
in a shell-and-tube exchanger and then sent to a  separator.
The  non-aqueous phase from the separator is stored as crude
terpene while the aqueous phase is  removed  as  wastewater.
The  bottom  stream  from this second distillation column is
the finished wood rosin product.

The crude terpene, which has  been  removed  in  the  second
distillation  column,  is stored until a sufficient quantity
has been accumulated, then this material is processed  in  a
batch  distillation  column.   The  distillation  column  is
charged with the crude terpene material, the overhead vapors
are  condensed  in  a  shell-and-tube  exchanger,  and   the
condensed  material  enters a separator.  The turpentine and
pine oil products are removed from this separator while  the
vapors  and  the steam from the steam ejector enter a second
shell-and-tube exchanger and proceed to  a  separator.   The
non-aqueous  phase  from  the  separator  is recycled to the
extract liquor storage while the aqueous phase  is  sent  to
wastewater   treatment.    The   bottom   from   this  batch
distillation column is a  residue  containing  high-boiling-
point  materials,  best described as pitch.  This residue is
used for fuel.

    Subcategory D - Tall Oil Rosin, Fatty Acids, and Pitch

Technology for the production of high-purity tall oil  rosin
and  fatty acids is relatively recent compared to the age of
the wood and gum rosin manufacture.   The  first  commercial
fractionation  process  was  completed  in  1949  by Arizona
Chemical.   The  Arizona  plant  employed   partial   vacuum
distillation  techniques  used in the petroleum refining in-
dustry and adapted to protect the integrity  of  tall  oil's
heat-sensitive constitutents.

Modern  fractionation  techniques  yield  fatty  acids which
contain less than 2 percent rosin and rosins  which  contain
less  than  3  percent fatty acids.  Distillation techniques
employed  prior  to  the  current  fractionation  technology
employed  steam  distillation which produced rosin and fatty
acid   products   with   relatively    high    cross-product
cont a mi na ti on .

The  plant  surveyed during this study employed modern frac-
tionation distillation techniques.  A schematic process flow
diagram of this crude tall oil  (CTO)  fractionation  process
is presented in Figure IV-4.
                                43

-------
                                                                                                                             ro
                                                2
                                                O
                                                cc
                                                              id i-
                                                                       Q O
       V)
       _l

       5
       LJJ
       CO
       00
       LJJ

       LL

       O
LU     Z
*l    n
-J     LU
21    cc
"-i    Q
       Z
       <
       z
       O

       <
      I-
      co
                                               IX
                                               O
oc
<
a.
LU
CO
       cc
      Q.
      LU
      CO
                                                cc
                                                O

                                                LU
                                                oc
   Q    "-
   I    3
£ =>xo
co Q O H
                                             O
                                             O
                                             O

                                             CC
                                               l
                                          44

-------
The  plant  fractionates  CTO  to  produce  approximately 20
percent pitch, 49 percent fatty acids, and 31 percent rosin.
In addition, part of the plant's pitch and rosin  production
is  used  captively  for  the production of paper sizes.  No
wastewater discharges were observed coining  from  this  unit
during the survey period.

The  CTO is treated with dilute sulfuric acid to remove some
residual lignins  plus  mercaptans,  disulfides,  and  color
materials.   Acid wash water goes to the process sewer.  The
CTO then proceeds to  the  fractionation  process.   In  the
first  fractionation  column,  the pitch is removed from the
bottoms and is either sold,  saponified  for  production  of
size,  or  burned in boilers to recover its fuel value.  The
remaining fraction of the tall oil (rosin  and  fatty  acid)
then  proceeds  to  the pale plant, where the quality of the
raw material is improved through  the  removal  of  unwanted
materials such as color todies.  The second column in Figure
IV-4  separates  low-boiling point fatty acid material while
the third column completes the separation of fatty and rosin
acids.

Barometric contact condensers are employed to  condense  the
vacuum-jet steam.  The recirculated barometric contact water
is  cooled  by  a  holding  reservoir, while light-separable
organics are removed by means of an  induced  draft  cooling
tower.   This  contact  condenser water recirculation system
produces  little,  if  any,  discharge  of  wastewater,  and
therefore  is considered exemplary technology.  Once-through
cooling water is  used  in  non-contact  column  reflux  and
product heat exchangers.

         Subcategory E - Essential Oils

Figure  IV-5  is  a process flow schematic diagram for steam
distillation of cedarwood oil from scrap wood fines  of  red
cedar.

Raw  dry  dust from the planing mill and raw grain dust from
the sawmill are mixed to obtain the desired blend  and  then
fed pneumatically to mechanical cyclone separators which are
located  on  top  of the retorts.  At the time of our visit,
fugitive dust escaping from the cyclones was  visible.   For
purposes  of establishing a proposed raw waste loading  (RWL)
it is anticipated that these emissions could  be  controlled
by  more  efficient  cyclone separators.  After loading, the
extraction of oil of cedarwood is accomplished by  injecting
steam directly into the retort as shown in Figure IV-5.  The
steam  diffuses  through  the cedarwood dust, extracting the
                               45

-------
UJ
CC
D
a
       ai
       DC
       o

       LL
       D
       Z
       <
       E

       UJ
       cc
       UJ
       D
       C/5
       O
       CC
H
C
c
a
a
a
i
c
1 	 C
£ c
00 <
1 !
8 T
T

ii
5— ~l*J-- 1
s T s
s
> Z v
12 *<»
1- u. _j d
1 O O u- o
• < til
UJ OC
cc
c oc
3 	 1 uj
H
t <
e ^ s
t •• ui
J C/3
<




                                                                                                                                              n
                                                                                                                                              «*
I	
                                                                                                        ^ "•
                                                                                                     8=55
                                                                                                     ^9i
                                                                                                     Q- DC S
                                                            46

-------
oil of cedarwood, exits through the top of the  retort,  and
is condensed to an oil/water mixture.

Following the steam extraction, the spent sawdust is allowed
to  cool  for approximately two hours.  The spent sawdust is
then conveyed to storage from where it is eventually fed  as
fuel to the steam generators.

The  primary product is a crude light oil which is separated
by two oil/water separators immediately  downstream  of  the
condensers.   The  light oil is removed and mixed with clay.
The clay lightens the product by removing color  bodies  and
stabilizes  the  color  of the product by inhibiting further
oxidation.  The clay/oil slurry is  filtered  through  plate
and  frame  pressure  presses  and  the  spent  clay  filter
material is hauled to  landfill  for  final  disposal.   The
lightened  oil  product  proceeds to bulk storage, blending,
and is finally drummed for shipment.

The water phase,  which  is  separated  in  the  stillwells,
contains  a heavy red crude oil.  This material is separated
from the water phase in three settling tanks in series.  The
heavy red oil is periodically removed and drummed  for  sale
as  a  co-product,  while  the underflow, or remaining water
phase, is discharged as wastewater.

The  cedarwood  oil  process  has  been  described  and  the
operation  is representative of this category for production
of other essential oil products.

         Subcategory F - Rosin Derivatives

Most of  the  rosins  produced  in  the  United  States  are
actually  rosin  derivatives.   Prior  to the development of
rosin derivatives  rosin  was  used  in  the  production  of
printing  inks,  linoleum, varnishes, electrical insulation,
foundry core oils, leather, matches, adhesives, masonry, and
solder fluxes.   Rosins  have  some  undesirable  properties
which  include  a  tendency to crystallize from the solvents
employed, oxidation of the unsaturated chemical  bonds,  and
reaction   with   heavy   metal   salts.   Rosin  derivative
manufacturing has modified the various rosins  to  eliminate
these   undesirable   properties   and   to   enhance  their
application in the foregoing areas of application and  other
new areas.

During  this  study, two facilities which manufactured rosin
derivatives were surveyed.  Plant No. 1 was  producing  wood
rosin  ester  and  a phenolic modified tall oil ester during
the survey.  Plant No. 2 produces tall  oil  and  gum  rosin
                                 47

-------
based  esters of maleic anhydride, fumaric acid, substituted
phenolic, and other modified rosin based esters, as well  as
qlycerol   phthalate   alkyd.    Historical   data   on  the
manufacture were used, along with survey data, to  determine
RWL's.

It  should  be  noted  that  there are many rosin-derivative
manufacturing processes  which  were  not  included  in  the
study.   Those  processes  which  were not surveyed include:
isomerization,  oxidation,  hydrogenation,  dehydrogenation,
polymerization, salt formation, and decarboxylation.

Figure  IV-6  illustrates  the  process at Plant No. 2.  The
processes at Plant No. 1 are similar, except that the vacuum
jet steam is exhausted to the  atmosphere  and  the  process
wastewater   is   discharged   from   the  receiver  without
separation.

Process operating conditions  in  the  reaction  kettle  are
dependent  on  many variables, such as product specification
and raw materials.  For example, at Plant  No.  1  a  simple
ester  is  produced  from  stump  wood  rosin (WW grade) and
U.S.P. glycerin.  The esterification  reaction  takes  place
under   high-temperature   vacuum  conditions.   During  the
process, a steam sparge  (lasting approximately 2-3 hours) is
used to remove excess water of esterification, which  allows
completion of the reaction and removes fatty acid impurities
for compliance with product specifications.  The condensable
impurities  are  condensed in a non-contact condenser on the
vacuum leg  and  stored  in  a  receiver.   Non-condensables
escape  to  the atmosphere through the reflux vent and steam
vacuum jets.  Plant No.  1 also produces  phenol  and  maleic
anhydride-modified  tall  oil  rosin  esters.   The  process
operation is very similar to simple rosin  ester  production
except that steam sparging is seldom if ever used, and other
polyhydric alcohols may be used in the product formulation.

Plant No. 2 produces rosin-based esters of maleic anhydride,
fumaric  acid,  substituted  phenolic,  and  other  modified
rosin-based esters, as well as a glycerol  phthalate  alkyd.
Kettle  cook times and pressure conditions vary with type of
product.  No contact  sparge steam is  used  except  for  the
production  of  resins   to be used in hot melt adhesives and
chewing gum products, in which case steam sparge is used  at
the   end  of  the cook to remove lights and odors.  Unwanted
materials, such as fatty acids, water of esterification, and
sparge steam, are removed from the kettle by  means  of  the
vacuum   leg.   Condensable materials are condensed in a non-
contact  condenser and separated from the non-condensables in
the receiver.  Separable materials,  such  as fatty acids  and
                                48

-------
reaction  and  reflux  oils,  are separated from the process
wastewaters in the separator.  Vacuum  jet  steam  and  most
non-condensable  materials  are  removed in a scrubber which
uses a recirculated oil stream from the separator.  The oils
are recovered for a secondary market.
                                 49

-------
                         SECTION V

                   WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
General

This section is intended to describe and identify the  water
usage  and  wastewater  flows in individual processes in the
gum  and  wood  chemicals  manufacturing   segment.    After
developing  an  understanding  of the fundamental production
processes and their inter-relationships in each subcategory,
a  determination  was   made   of   the   best   method   of
characterizing  each  manufacturer's  discharges which would
enhance  the  interpretation  of  the  manufacturer's  water
pollution   profile.  If  unit  raw  waste  loads  could  be
developed for each production process within a segment, then
the current effluent wastewater profile could be obtained by
simply  adding  the  components,  and  future  profiles   by
projecting   the   types  and  sizes'  of  the  manufacturing
operation.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

The process RWL data for the six subcategories  in  the  gum
and  wood  chemicals manufacturing point source category are
presented individually in the  following  text.   Subsequent
discussions  in  these section will relate these data to the
total data base for gum  and  wood  chemicals,  and  compare
waste loadings and concentrations among subcategories.

    Subcategory A - Char and Charcoal Briquets

There   are   no  wastewater  discharges  from  the  process
operations in subcategory A.  For the  operation  as  it  is
described in Section IV, Figure IV-1, it is anticipated that
stormwater  runoff  would  carry  suspended solids loadings.
However, much of  the  dust  problem  and  suspended  solids
loading   in   stormwater  runoff  could  be  controlled  by
alternate materials handling systems.  For example,  buggies
could  be  used  to transport the materials without the need
for rehandling and thereby eliminate excessive fines produc-
tion.  Furthermore, it is  anticipated  that  no  wastewater
will be generated by the recovery of condensable by-products
in  the proposed recovery operation.  In fact, this recovery
 (air pollution control) operation should  be  an  additional
water consumer because of evaporative losses.
                               51

-------
                                                                                                                                                          s
                                                 oo

                                                 J-'
-l| O
\| Q.
E| i-
QJ

ra
SH
.*
-^
•^
a
^
o
+J
(/)
0)
3

(/I
l/l
  i-  o
-  Q-  o
O   O
r^   -*
j-   —
o   o
o   u\
(U

fO
>



cr
                  c
                  (U
                  Q.
                               —      O (D
                                                        52

-------
Based  on  the  above  observation, it can be concluded that
charcoal  production  and  hardwood  distillation   can   be
operated with no discharge of process wastewater pollutants.

    Subcategory B - Gum Rosin and Turpentine

In  the manufacturing processes for gum rosin and turpentine
as they  are  depicted  in  Figure  IV-2,  there  are  three
possible  sources  of  process  wastewaters:  crude gum wash
wastewater, still condensate and dehydration  brine.   Plant
No.  55  recycled the still condensate back into the process
to  wash  the  crude  gum  stock.   Despite   the   recycled
wastewater  stream,  plant  No.  55's RWL's were much higher
than plant No.  52's  RWL's,  as  the  following  tabulation
shows:
Plant No. 55
  Historical Data
  Survey Data

Weighted Average

Plant No. 52

Subcategory II
  Average
                      Flow
                      (1/kkg)
648
742

653

402


528
          BODS
         kg/kkq
8.11
4.39

7.88

0.99


4.44
           COD      TOC
          kq/kkg   kg/kkg
15.47
 8.29

15.0

 1.79


 8.40
3.06
0.33
The   historical   RWL   data  reported  for  Plant  No.  55
represented the average of  31  pieces  of  data  while  the
survey  RWL  data  were  developed from 2 composite samples.
The weighted average RWL  reported  for  Plant  No.  55  was
developed using the size of the respective data bases as the
weighting factor.

The disparity of the RWL's was discussed with personnel from
both  plants.   These  discussions  uncovered  several small
differences in operation between the two plants:

    1.   Plant No. 52 uses much less wash water  than  Plant
         No. 55  (106 L/kkg vs. 695 L/kkg).
    2.   Plant No. 52 treats the crude gum with oxalic  acid
         in  the melter vat and probably removes much of the
         insoluble oxalate salt in the filtration process as
         a solid waste.
    3.   Plant No. 55  uses  greater  quantities  of  oxalic
         acid.    However,   because  small  quantities  are
                                 53

-------
         involved  and  because  oxalic  acid  is  a  highly
         oxidized compound,  it is estimated that items 2 and
         3 would account for less than 0.2 Ibs BOD/1,000 Ibs
         product.

It  is  obvious from the above that a substantial portion of
the raw waste load and flow observed in this subcategory can
be prevented by careful in-process control  of  the  washing
cycle.   Proper  control  in  this  step will aid greatly in
attaining the limitations  imposed  by  regulation  of  this
subcategory.

    Subcategory C - Wood Rosin, Turpentine, and Pine Oil

The  manufacturing processes for wood rosin, turpentine, and
pine oil illustrated in Figure IV-3  produce  no  wastewater
discharge  from  stump  washing.   The water used is totally
recycled  after  solids  settle   out.    The   solids   are
periodically  removed  to  landfill.  The process wastewater
includes stripping, vacuum jet steam condensates,  and  unit
washdown  wastewaters.  The pertinent RWL's were observed to
be:

         Flow          BODS        COD     TOC
        (L/kkg)        kg/kkg      kg/kkg  kg/kkg

         9,470        6.49        12.6    4.14

These data were obtained at plant 54  and  represent  survey
data.

    Subcategory D - Tall Oil Rosin, Pitch, and Fatty Acids

Figure IV-4, which depicts the fractionation and refining of
crude  tall  oil,  indicates  that  the  sources  of process
wastewater include the acid treatment and overflow, if  any,
from    the   recirculated   evaporative   cooling   system.
Additional  process  loads  are   contributed   by   process
washdowns   and  guality  control  laboratory  wastes.   The
plant's control of contact cooling water  by  means  of  the
recirculated   evaporative   cooling  system  is  considered
exemplary  for  crude  tall  oil   processing   manufacture.
Discussions  with  plant  operating  personnel revealed that
separable  organics  which  float  to   the   top   of   the
recirculation  system1s reservoir are recovered and recycled
through the process and that a net water makeup  is  usually
required  to  maintain a certain level in the reservoir.  No
overflow from the  reservoir was observed during  the  survey
and it is assumed  that this is a normal operating condition.
Sources  of  normal makeup to the reservoir would be vacuum-
                                54

-------
jet steam, stripping steam condensates, and rainfall on  the
pond.

During  the  survey  substantial  contamination of the once-
through, non-contact condenser cooling water  was  observed.
Based  on  in-plant sampling performed during the survey, it
was determined that part of the  contamination  was  due  to
leaks  in the shell-and-tube condensers on the fractionation
columns, and the remainder of the concentration was  due  to
an   accidental   leak   or   cross-connection  between  the
barometric contact condenser  and  the  non-contact  cooling
systems.  In addition, numerous sources of other non-contact
cooling  water  and  steam  condensate  were  observed to be
discharging to a combined sewer system.

To determine the RWL for the CTO refining and  fractionation
units, the plant's total wastewater was measured and sampled
for  a continuous 24-hour period.  Concurrent grab composite
samples were taken  in-plant  to  determine  the  accidental
contamination   of  once-through  cooling  water  by  faulty
equipment, and this loading was subtracted from the  plant's
total effluent load.  The flow RWL was computed to be 19,400
L/kkg.   However, based on our understanding of the process,
discussions with manufacturing representatives, and the fact
that large amounts of water were  used  at  the  plant,  but
unaccounted  for,  it  was  estimated  that approximately 25
percent of  the  19,400  L/kkg  flow  RWL  represented  con-
taminated  wastewater.  Its source, as discussed previously,
was  the  acid-treating   unit,   process   washdowns,   and
discharges   from   the  quality  control  laboratory.   The
remaining portion of the flow RWL  was  classified  as  non-
contact  waters  and  therefore  not included.  The previous
segregation of non-contact waters did not  affect  the  BOD,
COD,   or   TOC   RWL  data  but  merely  affected  the  RWL
concentration.

Based on the  above  discussion,  the  pertinent  RWL's  for
Subcategory D are:

           Flow        BODS       COD         TOC
           fL/kkg)     kg/kkg     kg/kkg      kg/kkg

           4,860       3.11       7.08        1.58

    Subcategory E - Essential Oils

The steam used for each batch extraction of oil of cedarwood
yields  a contaminated condensate.  This represents the only
process   wastewater   discharge   from    essential    oils
manufacture, and its RWL's are:
                                55

-------
                                               •  Table  V -2




                                      Miscellaneous Raw Waste Load Data


RWL
Flow
L/kkg
TSS
mg/L
kg/kkg
TDS
mg/L
kg/kkg
Oil
mg/L
kg/kkg
Acidity
mg/L
kg/kkg
Alkalinity
mg/L
kg/kkg
TKN-N
mg/L
kg/kkg
NH3-N
mg/L
kg/kkg
N03-N
mg/L
kg/kkg
T-P
mg/L
kg/kkg
Color Units
mg/L
kg/kkg
SO^
mg/L
kg/kkg
Phenol
mg/L
kg/kkg
Ca
mg/L
kg/kkg
Mg
mg/L
kg/kkg
Cn
mg/L
kg/kkg
Zn
mg/L
kg/kkg
Cl
mg/L
kg/kkg
Subeategory B -
Gum Rosin and
Turpentine

528

265
0.140

3,640
1.92

441
0.233

2,610
1.38

—
—

22.7
0.012

9.5
0.005

Interference
—

2.3
0.0012

210
--
254
0.134

0.68
0.00036

o! 030

o!ooi6

0.03
—

15.9
0.0082

189
0.10
Subcategory C -
Wood Rosin,
Turpentine and
Pine Oil

9,470

31
0.29

702
6.65

50
0.4?

11
0.10

192
1.82

4.2
0.04

0.11
0.001

—
—

0.4
0.0036

93
	
150
1.42

0.21
0.002

132
1.25

14.8
0.14

—
—

0.25
0.0024

18.0
0.17
Subcategory 0 -
Tall Oil Rosin,
Pitch and
Fatty Acids

4,860

Negative1
Negative1

654
3.18

325
1.58

82.
0.40

300
1.46

—
—

Negative1

3.23
0.0157

—
Negative1

40
	
132
0.64

20.5
0.10

3.29
0.016

Negative1

—
—

—
—

2.1
0.01
Subcategory E -
Essential
Oils

62,100

6
0.37

55
3.41

0.5
0.03

593
36.8

—
—

8.4
0.52

.16
0.01

0.23
0.014

0.01
0.0006

—
—
1.0
0.06

0.31
0.019

0.5
0.03

0.10
0.006

—
--

--
--

2.2
0.14
Subcategory F -
Rosin
Derivatives

309

52
0.016

7480
2.31

356
0.11

841
0.26

—
—

12.9
0.004

19.4
0.006

0.06
0.00002

0.7
0.00021

--
"~
12.9
0.004

61.5
0.019

42.1
0.0130

9.06
0.0028

—
—

6.8
0.0021

17.8
0.055
Background TSS contributions exceeded the net increase across the process, resulting in a negative TSS - RWL.
                                                          56
                                                                                          V30/76

-------
           Flow         BOD       COD        TOG
          (L/kkg)      kq/kkq    kq/kkq     kq/kkq

          62,100        70.8      86.9      24.8

Subcategory _F - Rosin Derivatives

Process   wastewaters   from   the   manufacture   of  rosin
derivatives, by the process shown in Figure  IV-6,  include:
water  of  reaction;  sparge  steam, if used; and vacuum jet
steam.  Non-contact cooling water  is  used  in  the  kettle
overhead  condensers,  and periodically on the kettle coils.
The once-through cooling water was segregated  from  process
wastewaters  at  both  plants.   Sample  analyses confirm no
pollutant pickup in the non-contact cooling  water  streams.
Subcategory F RWL1s are presented below:

                   Flow        BODS      COD       TOC
                  (L/kkq)      (kq/kkq)   (kq/kkq)   (kq/kkq)

Plant No. 57      395         4.11      7.33      3.10

Plant No. 55
 Historical Data  214         4.59      9.64
 Survey Data      273         5.26      11.00      3.90

Weighted Average  222         4.68      9.83

Subcategory F Av. 309         4.40      8.58

The   historical   RWL   data  reported  for  plant  No.  55
represented the average of  18  pieces  of  data,  while  the
survey  RWL  data  were  developed from 3 composite samples.
The weighted average RWL  reported  for  plant  No.  55  was
developed using the size of the respective data bases as the
weighting factor.

    General Waste Characteristics
                         v
Table  V-2  lists  the BPT raw waste load values assigned to
each  subcategory.   These  values  include  the   following
parameters:

    1.  Contact process wastewater flow  (liters/kkg of
        product)
    2.  BOD raw waste load  (kg BOD/kkg of product)
    3.  COD raw waste load  (kg COD/kkg  of product)
    4.  TOC raw waste load  (kg TOC/kkg of product)
                                 57

-------
Raw waste load data for all parameters analyzed in the field
survey  (except BODS, COD and TOG)  are presented in Table V-
3.

For  purposes  of  comparison,  concentrations   have   been
calculated  for  the  BODS  parameter  by  dividing the BODS
loading by  the  corresponding  contact  process  wastewater
flow.   Examination of these data indicates a variability in
flows, loadings, and resulting concentrations.

It should be noted that the BODS  concentrations  shown  are
based on wastewaters coming directly from the process and do
not  necessarily  represent the waste concentrations which a
treatment plant would receive.  If the plant manufactured  a
single  product  which  generated concentrated wastes, these
might be diluted with contaminated cooling water  and  steam
condensate  or  other non-contact waters prior to biological
treatment.   In  a  multi-product  plant,  the  concentrated
wastewater  might  be  diluted with less concentrated wastes
from other processes.
                                58

-------
                         SECTION VI

             SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
General

From  review  of  NPDES  permit  applications   for   direct
discharge  of  wastewaters  from  various industries grouped
under gum and wood  chemicals  and  examination  of  related
published  data,  twelve  parameters   (listed in Table VI-1)
were selected and examined for  all  industrial  wastewaters
during   the  field  data  collection  program.   All  field
sampling data are summarized in Supplement B.  Supplement  B
includes  laboratory  analytical  results,  data from plants
visited, RWL  calculations,  historical  data,  analysis  of
historical   data,   computer   print-outs   (showing  flows,
production, and pollutants, performance  data  on  treatment
technologies   and   effluent   limitations   calculations).
Supplement  A  has   design   calculations,   capital   cost
calculations,  and  annual cost calculations.  Supplements A
and B are available at the EPA Public  Information  Reference
Unit, Room 2922 (EPA Library), Waterside Mall, 401 M Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C., 20160.

The  degree  of  impact  on the overall environment has been
used as a basis for dividing the pollutants into  groups  as
follows:

    Pollutants of significance.
    Rationale for selection of pollutant parameters.
    Pollutants of specific significance.

The rationale and justification for pollutant categorization
within  the  foregoing  groupings, as  discussed herein, will
indicate the basis for  selection  of  the  parameters  upon
which   the  actual  effluent  limitations  guidelines  were
postulated  for  each  industrial  category.   In  addition,
particular  parameters have been discussed in terms of their
validity as measures of environmental  impact and as  sources
of analytical insight.

Pollutants observed from the field data that were present in
sufficient  concentrations  so  as  to interfere  with,  be
incompatible with, or pass with inadequate treatment through
publicly owned treatment works are discussed in Section  XII
of this document.
                                 59

-------
    Pollutants of Significance

Parameters  of  pollution  significance for the gum and wood
chemicals manufacturing point source category are BODS, COD,
TOC, and TSS.

BOD5, COD, and TOC  have  been  selected  as  pollutants  of
significance  because  they  are the primary measurements of
organic  pollution.   In  the  survey  of   the   industrial
categories,  almost  all of the effluent data collected from
wastewater  treatment  facilities  were  based  upon   BOD5,
because  almost all the treatment facilities were biological
processes.   If  other  processes  (such   as   evaporation,
incineration,  or activated carbon) are utilized, either COD
or TOC may be a more appropriate measure of  pollution.   In
either case the COD parameter is highly reliable and rapidly
measured.

Because   historical   data   is   not  available  for  TOC,
limitations will only be set for BOD5, COD and TSS.
                                  60

-------
        Table VI-1



List of Parameters Examined



Acidity and Alkalinity-pH



Oil and Grease



Biochemical Oxygen Demand



Chemical Oxygen Demand



Total Organic Carbon



Total Suspended Solids



Phenols



Phosphorus



Zinc



Dissolved Solids



Nitrogen Compounds



Sulfates



Temperature
              61

-------
RATIONALE FOR THE SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS

I.  Pollutant. Proper-ties

Acidity and Alkalinity - pH

Although not a specific pollutant,  pH  is  related  to  the
acidity  or alkalinity of a waste water stream.  It is not a
linear or direct measure of either, however, it may properly
be used as a surrogate to control both  excess  acidity  and
excess alkalinity in water.  The term pH is used to describe
the   hydrogen   ion   -  hydroxyl  ion  balance  in  water.
Technically,  pH  is  the  hydrogen  ion  concentration   or
activity  present  in  a given solution.  pH numbers are the
negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration.  A  pH
of  7  generally  indicates  neutrality or a balance between
free hydrogen and free hydroxyl ions.  Solutions with  a  pH
above  7  indicate that the solution is alkaline, while a pH
below 7 indicates that the solution is acid.

Knowledge of the pH of water or waste  water  is  useful  in
determining   necessary   measures  for  corrosion  control,
pollution control, and disinfection.  Waters with a pH below
6.0 are corrosive to water  works  structures,  distribution
lines,  and  household  plumbing fixtures and such corrosion
can add   constituents  to  drinking  water  such  as  iron,
copper,  zinc,  cadmium,  and  lead.  Low pH waters not only
tend to dissolve metals from  structures  and  fixtures  but
also  tend  to  redissolve  or leach metals from sludges and
bottom sediments.  The hydrogen ion concentration can affect
the "taste" of the water and  at   a  low  pH,  water  tastes
"sour".

Extremes  of  pH  or  rapid  pH  changes  can  exert  stress
conditions or kill  aquatic  life  outright.  Even  moderate
changes   from   "acceptable"  criteria  limits  of  pH  are
deleterious to some   species.   The  relative  toxicity*  to
aquatic  life  of  many materials  is increased by changes in
the water pH.   For   example,  metalocyanide  complexes  can
increase  a  thousand-fold in toxicity with a drop of 1.5 pH
units.  Similarly, the toxicity of ammonia  is a function  of
pH.   The   bactericidal  effect of chlorine in most cases is
less  as  the  pH  increases,   and   it    is   economically
advantageous to keep  the pH close  to 7.
 *The term toxic  or toxicity is  used herein in the normal
 scientific sense of the  word and not as a specialized
 term referring to section 307 (a)  of the Act.
                               62

-------
Acidity is defined as the quantitative ability of a water to
neutralize  hydroxyl  ions.   It is usually expressed as the
calcium  carbonate   equivalent   of   the   hydroxyl   ions
neutralized.   Acidity should not be confused with pH value.
Acidity is the  quantity  of  hydrogen  ions  which  may  be
released  to react with or neutralize hydroxyl ions while pH
is a measure of the free hydrogen ions in a solution at  the
instant  the  pH  measurement  is  made.  A property of many
chemicals, called buffering, may hold  hydrogen  ions  in  a
solution  from being in the free state and being measured as
pH.  The bond of most buffers is rather  weak  and  hydrogen
ions  tend  to  be  released  from  the  buffer as needed to
maintain a fixed pH value.

Highly acid waters are corrosive  to  metals,  concrete  and
living organisms, exhibiting the pollutional characteristics
outlined  above  for  low pH waters.  Depending on buffering
capacity, water may have a higher total acidity at pH values
of 6.0 than other waters with a pH value of 4.0.

Alkalinity: Alkalinity is defined as the ability of a  water
to neutralize hydrogen ions.  It is usually expressed as the
calcium   carbonate   equivalent   of   the   hydrogen  ions
neutralized.

Alkalinity is commonly caused by the presence of carbonates,
bicarbonates, hydroxides and to a lesser extent by  borates,
silicates, phophates and organic substances.  Because of the
nature   of   the  chemicals  causing  alkalinity,  and  the
buffering capacity of carbon dioxide in water, very high  pH
values are seldom found in natural waters.

Excess  alkalinity  as exhibited in a high pH value may make
water corrosive  to  certain  metals,  detrimental  to  most
natural organic materials and toxic to living organisms.

Ammonia is more lethal with a higher pH.  The lacrimal fluid
of  the  human  eye  has  a  pH  of  approximately 7.0 and a
deviation of 0.1 pH unit from the norm  may  result  in  eye
irritation  for  the  swimmer.   Appreciable irritation will
cause severe pain.

Oil and Grease

Because of widespread use, oil and  grease  occur  often  in
waste water streams.  These oily wastes may be classified as
follows:

    1.   Light Hydrocarbons - These include light fuels such
         as  gasoline,   kerosene,   and   jet   fuel,   and
                               63

-------
         miscellaneous    solvents   used   for   industrial
         processing,  degreasing,  or cleaning purposes.    The
         presence  of  these light hydrocarbons may make the
         removal  of   other   heavier   oily   wastes   more
         difficult.

    2.   Heavy Hydrocarbons, Fuels, and Tars - These include
         the crude oils,  diesel oils, #6 fuel oil,  residual
         oils,  slop   oils,  and  in some cases, asphalt and
         road tar.

    3.   Lubricants and Cutting  Fluids  -  These  generally
         fall  into  two classes: non-emulsifiable oils such
         as lubricating oils and  greases  and  emulsifiable
         oils  such  as  water  soluble  oils, rolling  oils,
         cutting oils, and drawing compounds.   Emulsifiable
         oils   may   contain  fat  soap  or  various  other
         additives.

    4.   Vegetable  and  Animal  Fats  and  Oils   -   These
         originate  primarily  from  processing of foods and
         natural products.

    These compounds can settle or float  and  may  exist  as
    solids  or liquids depending upon factors such as method
    of use, production process,  and  temperature  of  waste
    water.

Oils  and  grease even in small quantities cause troublesome
taste and odor problems.   Scum lines from these  agents  are
produced   on   water   treatment   basin  walls  and  other
containers.  Fish and water fowl are adversely  affected  by
oils  in  their  habitat.   Oil  emulsions may adhere to the
gills of fish causing suffocation, and the flesh of fish  is
tainted  when  microorganisms that were exposed to waste oil
are eaten.  Deposition of oil in  the  bottom  sediments  of
water  can  serve to inhibit normal benthic growth.  Oil and
grease exhibit an oxygen demand.

Levels  of  oil  and  grease  which  are  toxic  to  aquatic
organisms  vary  greatly,  depending  on  the  type  and the
species susceptibility.  However, it has been reported  that
crude  oil in concentrations as low as 0.3 mg/1 is extremely
toxic to fresh-water fish.  It  has  been  recommended  that
public water supply sources be essentially free from oil and
grease.

Oil  and  grease in quantities of 100 1/sq km  (10 gallons/sq
mile) show up as a sheen on the  surface of a body of  water.
The  presence  of  oil  slicks  prevent  the  full aesthetic
                               64

-------
enjoyment of water.   The presence of oil in water  can  also
increase  the  toxicity of other substances being discharged
into  the  receiving  bodies   of   water.     Municipalities
frequently  limit the quantity of oil and grease that can be
discharged  to  their  waste  water  treatment  systems   by
industry.

Oxygen Demand (BOD,  COD, TOG and DO)

Organic  and  some  inorganic  compounds can cause an oxygen
demand  to  be  exerted  in  a  receiving  body  of   water.
Indigenous  microorganisms  utilize the organic wastes as an
energy source and oxidize the organic matter.  In  doing  so
their   natural   respiratory   activity  will  utilize  the
dissolved oxygen.

Dissolved oxygen  (DO)  in  water  is  a  quality  that,  in
appropriate  concentrations,  is  essential not only to keep
organisms living but also to sustain  species  reproduction,
vigor,   and  the  development  of  populations.   Organisms
undergo stress at reduced DO concentrations that  make  them
less  competitive  and  less  able  to sustain their species
within the aquatic environment.   For  example,  reduced  DO
concentrations  have  been  shown  to  interfere  with  fish
population through delayed hatching of  eggs,  reduced  size
and  vigor  of  embryos, production of deformities in young,
interference with  food  digestion,  acceleration  of  blood
clotting,  decreased tolerance to certain toxicants, reduced
food  utilization  efficiency,  growth  rate,  and   maximum
sustained  swimming  speed.   Other  organisms  are likewise
affected adversely during conditions of decreased DO.  Since
all aerobic aquatic organisms  need   a  certain  amount  of
oxygen,  the  consequences  of  total depletion of dissolved
oxygen due  to  a  high  oxygen  demand  can  kill  all  the
inhabitants of the affected aquatic area.

It  has  been  shown  that  fish  may,  under  some  natural
conditions,    become    acclimatized    to    low    oxygen
concentrations.   Within  certain   limits,  fish  can adjust
their rate of respiration to compensate for changes  in  the
concentration  of dissolved oxygen.  It is generally agreed,
moreover, that those species which are sluggish in  movement
 (e.g.,carp,   pike,   eel)   can   withstand   lower  oxygen
concentrations than fish which  are  more  lively  in  habit
 (such as trout or salmon).

The  lethal affect of low concentrations of dissolved oxygen
in water appears to be increased by the  presence  of  toxic
 substances,  such  as ammonia, cyanides, zinc, lead, copper,
or cresols.  With so many factors influencing the effect  of
                                  65

-------
oxygen  deficiency,  it is difficult to estimate the minimum
safe concentrations at which fish  will  be  unharmed  under
natural  conditions.   Many  investigations seem to indicate
that a DO level of 5.0 mg/1 is desirable for a good  aquatic
environment  and  higher DO levels are required for selected
types of aquatic environments.

Biochemical oxygen demand  (BOD)  is the  quantity  of  oxygen
required  for  the  biological  and  chemical  oxidation  of
waterborn  substances  under  ambient  or  test  conditions.
Materials   which   may   contribute  to  the  BOD  include:
carbonaceous organic materials usable as a  food  source  by
aerobic   organisms;   oxidizable   nitrogen   derived  from
nitrites, ammonia and organic nitrogen compounds which serve
as  food  for  specific  bacteria;  and  certain  chemically
oxidizable   materials   such  as  ferrous  iron,  sulfides,
sulfite, etc.  which will react with dissolved oxygen or are
metabolized by bacteria.  In most industrial  and  municipal
waste  waters,  the  BOD  derives  principally  from organic
materials and from ammonia  (which  is  itself  derived  from
animal or vegetable matter).

The  BOD  of  a  waste  exerts  an  adverse  effect upon the
dissolved oxygen resources of a body of  water  by  reducing
the  oxygen available to fish, plant life, and other aquatic
species.   Conditions  can  be  reached  where  all  of  the
dissolved  oxygen  in  the  water  is  utilized resulting in
anaerobic conditions and the production of undesirable gases
such as hydrogen sulfide  and  methane.   The  reduction  of
dissolved  oxygen  can  be  detrimental to fish populations,
fish growth rate, and organisms used as fish food.  A  total
lack  of  oxygen due to the exertion of an excessive BOD can
result in the death of all aerobic  aquatic  inhabitants  in
the affected area.

Water  with a high BOD indicates the presence of decomposing
organic   matter   and   associated   increased    bacterial
concentrations  that degrade its quality and potential uses.
A by-product of high BOD   concentrations  can  be  increased
algal   concentrations   and   blooms   which   result  from
decomposition of the organic matter and which form the basis
of algal populations.

The BOD5_  (5-day BOD) test  is used  widely  to  estimate  the
pollutional  strength  of  domestic and industrial wastes in
terms of the oxygen that they  will  require  if  discharged
into  receiving  streams.   The  test is an important one in
water   pollution   control  activities.   It  is   used   for
pollution  control  regulatory  activities,  to evaluate the
design  and efficiencies of waste water treatment works,  and
                              66

-------
to  indicate  the  state  of  purification  or  pollution of
receiving bodies of water.

Complete biochemical oxidation of a given waste may  require
a  period  of  incubation  too long for practical analytical
test purposes.  For this reason, the 5-day period  has  been
accepted  as  standard,  and  the  test  results  have  been
designated as BODJ5.  Specific chemical test methods are  not
readily   available  for  measuring  the  quantity  of  many
degradable substances and their reaction products.  Reliance
in such cases is placed on the collective  parameter,  BODj>,
which  measures  the  weight of dissolved oxygen utilized by
microorganisms  as  they  oxidize  or  transform  the  gross
mixture  of  chemical  compounds  in  the  waste water.  The
biochemical reactions involved in the oxidation   of  carbon
compounds  are  related  to  the  period of incubation.  The
five-day BOD  normally  measures  only  60  to  80%  of  the
carbonaceous  biochemical  oxygen  demand of the sample, and
for  many  purposes  this   is   a   reasonable   parameter.
Additionally,  it can be used to estimate the gross quantity
of oxidizable organic matter.

The BOD5 test is  essentially  a  bioassay  procedure  which
provides   an   estimate   of   the   oxygen   consumed   by
microorganisms utilizing the degradable matter present in  a
waste under conditions that are representative of those that
are likely to occur in nature.  Standard conditions of time,
temperature,  suggested  microbial  seed, and dilution water
for the wastes have been defined and are incorporated in the
standard analytical procedure.   Through  the  use  of  this
procedure,  the  oxygen  demand  of  diverse  wastes  can be
compared and evaluated for pollution potential and  to  some
extent for treatability by biological treatment processes.

Because  the  BOD  test  is  a  bioassay  procedure,  it  is
important that the environmental conditions of the  test  be
suitable   for   the   microorganisms   to  function  in  an
uninhibited manner at all  times.   This  means  that  toxic
substances  must be absent and that the necessary nutrients,
such as nitrogen, phosphorous, and trace elements,  must  be
present.

Chemical  oxygen demand  (COD) is a purely chemical oxidation
test devised as an alternate method of estimating the  total
oxygen  demand of a waste water.  Since the method relies on
the oxidation-reduction system of chemical  analyses  rather
than  on  biological  factors, it is more precise, accurate,
and rapid.than the BOD test.  The COD test is widely used to
estimate the total oxygen demand (ultimate rather than 5-day
BOD) to oxidize the compounds in a waste water.  It is based
                              67

-------
on the fact that organic compounds, with a  few  exceptions,
can  be  oxidized  by strong chemical oxidizing agents under
acid conditions with the  assistance  of  certain  inorganic
catalysts.

The  COD  test  measures the oxygen demand of compounds that
are biologically  degradable  and  of  many  that  are  not.
Pollutants  which  are  measured  by  the  BOD5 test will be
meausred by the COD test.  In addition, pollutants which are
more resistant to biological oxidation will also be measured
as COD.  COD is a more inclusive measure  of  oxygen  demand
than  is BOD5 and will result in higher oxygen demand values
than will the BOD_5 test.

The  compounds  which  are  more  resistant  to   biological
oxidation  are  becoming  of greater and greater concern not
only because of their slow but continuing oxygen  demand  on
the  resources  of  the receiving water, but also because of
their potential health effects on aquatic life  and  humans.
Many  of  these  compounds result from industrial discharges
and some have been found to have carcinogenic, mutagenic and
similar adverse effects, either singly  or  in  combination.
Concern  about  these compounds has increased as a result of
demonstrations that their long life in  receiving  waters
the  result  of  a  slow biochemical oxidation rate - allows
them to contaminate downstream water intakes.  The  commonly
used  systems  of  water  purification  are not effective in
removing these types of materials and disinfection  such  as
chlorination  may  convert  them  into  even  more hazardous
materials.

Thus the COD test measures organic matter  which  exerts  an
oxygen demand and which may affect the health of the people.
It  is  a  useful  analytical  tool  for  pollution  control
activities.  It provides a more  rapid  measurement  of  the
oxygen demand and an estimate of organic compounds which are
not measured in the BOB5 test.

Total  organic  carbon   (TQC)  is  measured by the catalytic
conversion of organic carbon in  a  waste  water  to  carbon
dioxide.   Most  organic  chemicals  have  been  found to be
measured  quantitatively by the equipment now  in  use.   The
time  of  analyses is short, from 5 to 10 minutes, permitting
a rapid and accurate estimate of the organic carbon  content
of  the   waste  waters  to  be  made by relatively unskilled
personnel.

A TOC value does not indicate the  rate at which  the  carbon
compounds are oxidized in the natural environment.  The TOC
test will measure compounds that are  readily  biodegradable
                                68

-------
and measured by the BOD5 test as well as those that are not.
TOC  analyses  will  include  those  biologically  resistant
organic compounds that are of concern in the environment.

BOD  and  COD  methods  of  analyses  are  based  on  oxygen
utilization  of the waste water.  The TOC analyses estimates
the total carbon content of a waste water.  There is as  yet
no  fundamental  correlation  of  TOC  to either BOD or COD.
However,  where  organic  laden  waste  waters  are   fairly
uniform,  there  will be a fairly constant correlation among
TOC, BOD and COD.  Once such a correlation  is  established,
TOC  can  be used as an inexpensive test for routine process
monitoring.

Total Suspended Solids  (TSS)

Suspended  solids  include  both   organic   and   inorganic
materials.   The inorganic compounds include sand, silt, and
clay.  The  organic  fraction  includes  such  materials  as
grease,  oil,  tar, and animal and vegetable waste products.
These solids may settle out rapidly and bottom deposits  are
often  a  mixture  of  both  organic  and  inorganic solids.
Solids may be suspended in water for a time, and then settle
to the bed of the stream or lake.  These  solids  discharged
with   man's  wastes  may  be  inert,  slowly  biodegradable
materials, or rapidly  decomposable  substances.   While  in
suspension, they increase the turbidity of the water, reduce
light  penetration and impair the photosynthetic activity of
aquatic plants.

Suspended solids in water  interfere  with  many  industrial
processes,  cause  foaming  in  boilers and incrustations on
equipment  exposed  to  such  water,   especially   as   the
temperature  rises.   They  are undesirable in process water
used in the manufacture of steel, in the  textile  industry,
in laundries, in dyeing, and in cooling systems.

Solids  in  suspension  are aesthetically displeasing.  When
they settle to form sludge deposits on the  stream  or  lake
bed,  they are often damaging to the life in water.  Solids,
when transformed to sludge deposits, may  do  a  variety  of
damaging things, including blanketing the stream or lake bed
and  thereby  destroying the living spaces for those benthic
organisms that would otherwise occupy the habitat.  When  of
an  organic  nature,  solids  use  a  portion  or all of the
dissolved oxygen available in the area.   Organic  materials
also  serve  as a food source for sludgeworms and associated
organisms.
                                 69

-------
Disregarding any toxic  effect  attributable  to  substances
leached  out  by  water,  suspended solids may kill fish and
shellfish by causing abrasive injuries and by  clogging  the
gills  and  respiratory  passages  of various aguatic fauna.
Indirectly, suspended solids are inimical  to  aguatic  life
because they screen out light, and they promote and maintain
the   development   of  noxious  conditions  through  oxygen
depletion.  This results in the killing  of  fish  and  fish
food   organisms.    Suspended   solids   also   reduce  the
recreational value of the water.

Turbidity: Turbidity of water is related to  the  amount  of
suspended  and  colloidal matter contained in the water.  It
affects the clearness and penetration of light.  The  degree
of  turbidity  is  only  an  expression  of  one  effect  of
suspended solids upon the character of the water.  Turbidity
can reduce the effectiveness of chlorination and can  result
in   difficulties   in  meeting  BOD  and  suspended  solids
limitations.  Turbidity is an indirect measure of  suspended
solids.
Phenols

Phenols,  defined  as hydroxy derivatives of benzene and its
condensed nuclei, may occur in domestic and industrial waste
water and in drinking water supplies.  Chlorination of  such
waters  can  produce  odoriferous  and objectionable tasting
chlorophenols   which   may   include   o-chlorophenol,   p-
chlorophenol, and 2, 4-dichlorophenol.

Although  described  in  the  technical literature simply as
phenols, the phenol waste category can include a wide  range
of  similar  chemical  compounds.   In  terms  of  pollution
control, reported concentrations of phenols are  the  result
of  a standard methodology which measures a general group of
similar compounds rather  than  being  based  upon  specific
identification    of    the    single    compound,    phenol
 (hydroxybenzene).

Phenols are used in some cutting oils and in the molding  of
plastics.   Cutting  fluids  can  contain phenolic compounds
since these materials are normal constituents of hydrocarbon
mixtures.  In addition, phenolic compounds are added to oils
as preservatives or for odor control.  They also  are  found
in  the  waste  waters  from the petroleum industry and from
certain products of the organic chemical industry.

Phenolic compounds may adversely affect fish  in  two  ways:
first,  by a direct toxic action, and second, by imparting  a
                                 70

-------
taste to the fish flesh.   The  toxicity  of  phenol  towards
fish  increases as the dissolved oxygen level is diminished,
as the  temperature  is  raised,  and  as  the  hardness  is
lessened.   Phenol  appears to act as a nerve poison causing
too much blood to get to the gills and to the  heart  cavity
and  is  reported  to  have  a toxic threshold of 0.1 to .15
mg/1.

Mixed  phenolic   substances   appear   to   be   especially
troublesome  in imparting taste to fish flesh.  Chlorophenol
produces a bad taste in  fish  far  below  lethal  or  toxic
doses.   Threshold  concentrations  for  taste  or  odor  in
chlorinated water supplies have  been  reported  as  low  as
0.00001-0.001  mg/1.   Phenols in concentrations of only one
part per billion have been known to affect water supplies.

The ingestion of concentrated solutions of phenol by  humans
results   in  severe  pain,  renal  irritation,  shock,  and
possibly death.  A total dose of 1.5  grams  may  be  fatal.
Phenols  can  be metabolized and oxidized in waste treatment
facilities containing organisms  acclimated  to  the  phenol
concentration in the wastes.

Phosphorus

Phosphorus  occurs  in natural waters and in waste waters in
the form of various types of  phosphate.   These  forms  are
commonly    classified   into   orthophosphates,   condensed
phosphates    (pyro-,   meta-,   and   polyphosphorus),   and
organically  bound  phosphates.   These  may  occur  in  the
soluble form, in particles of detritus or in the  bodies  of
aquatic organisms.

The  various  forms  of phosphates find their way into waste
waters  from  a  variety  of  industrial,  residential,  and
commercial  sources.   Small  amounts  of  certain condensed
phosphates are added to some water supplies in the course of
potable water  treatment.   Large  quantities  of  the  same
compounds may be added when the water is used for laundering
or   other   cleaning   since   these  materials  are  major
constituents  of  many  commercial  cleaning   preparations.
Phosphate  coating  of  metals  is  another  major source of
phosphates in certain industrial effluents.

The increasing problem of the growth of algae in streams and
lakes appears to be associated with the increasing  presence
of   certain  dissolved  nutrients,  chief  among  which  is
phosphorus.  Phosphorus is an element which is essential  to
the  growth  of  organisms  and it can often be the nutrient
that limits the aquatic growth that  a  body  of  water  can
                               71

-------
support.    In  instances  where  phosphorous  is  a  growth
limiting nutrient, the  discharge  of  sewage,  agricultural
drainage  or  certain industrial wastes to a receiving water
may  stimulate  the  growth,  in  nuisance  quantities,   of
photosynthetic aquatic microorganisms and macroorganisms.

The  increase  in  organic  matter  production  by algae and
plants in a lake undergoing eutrophication has ramifications
throughout the aquatic ecosystem.  Greater demand is  placed
on  the  dissolved oxygen in the water as the organic matter
decomposes at the termination of the life  cycles.   Because
of  this  process,  the deeper waters of the lake may become
entirely  depleted  of  oxygen,  thereby,  destroying   fish
habitats   and  leading  to  the  elimination  of  desirable
species.   The  settling  of  particulate  matter  from  the
productive  upper layers changes the character of the bottom
mud, also leading to the replacement of certain  species  by
less  desirable  organisms.  Of great importance is the fact
that nutrients inadvertently introduced to a lake  are,  for
the  most  part,  trapped  there and recycled in accelerated
biological processes. Consequently, the  damage  done  to  a
lake  in  a  relatively  short time requires a many fold in-
crease  in time for recovery of the lake.

When a plant population  is  stimulated  in  production  and
attains  a  nuisance  status,  a  large number of associated
liabilities are immediately apparent.  Dense populations  of
pond  weeds  make  swimming  dangerous.   Boating  and water
skiing and sometimes fishing may be  eliminated  because  of
the  mass of vegetation that serves as a physical impediment
to such activities.  Plant populations have been  associated
with  stunted fish populations and with poor fishing.  Plant
nuisances emit vile stenches, impart  tastes  and  odors  to
water   supplies,  reduce  the  efficiency  of industrial and
municipal water treatment, impair aesthetic  beauty,  reduce
or  restrict resort trade, lower waterfront property values,
cause skin rashes to man during water contact, and serve  as
a desired substrate and breeding ground for flies.

Phosphorus  in the elemental form is particularly toxic, and
subject to bioaccumulation in much the same way as  mercury.
Colloidal  elemental  phosphorus  will  poison  marine  fish
 (causing skin tissue breakdown ' and  discoloration).   Also,
phosphorus   is   capable  of  being  concentrated  and  will
accumulate in organs and   soft  tissues.   Experiments  have
shown   that  marine  fish  will  concentrate phosphorus from
water containing  as little as 1 ug/1.
                                  72

-------
Zinc (Zn)

Occurring abundantly in rocks  and  ores,  zinc  is  readily
refined  into a stable pure metal and is used extensively as
a metal, an alloy, and a  plating  material.   In  addition,
zinc  salts  are  also  used  in  paint  pigments, dyes, and
insecticides.   Many  of  these  salts   (for  example,  zinc
chloride  and  zinc  sulfate)  are  highly soluble in water;
hence,  it  is  expected  that  zinc  might  occur  in  many
industrial wastes.  On the other hand, some zinc salts  (zinc
carbonate,  zinc oxide, zinc sulfide)  are insoluble in water
and, consequently,  it  is  expected  that  some  zinc  will
precipitate and be removed readily in many natural waters.

In  soft  water,  concentrations of zinc ranging from 0.1 to
1.0 mg/1 have been reported to be lethal to fish.   Zinc  is
thought  to  exert  its  toxic  action  by forming insoluble
compounds with the mucous that covers the gills,  by  damage
to the gill epithelium, or possibly by acting as an internal
poison.   The  sensitivity  of  fish  to  zinc  varies  with
species, age, and condition, as well as  with  the  physical
and   chemical   characteristics   of   the   water.    Some
acclimatization to the presence of the zinc is possible.  It
has also been observed that the effects  of  zinc  poisoning
may  not  become  apparent  immediately so that fish removed
from zinc-contaminated to zinc-free water may die as long as
48 hours after the removal.  The presence of copper in water
may increase the toxicity  of  zinc  to  aquatic  organisms,
while  the  presence of calcium or hardness may decrease the
relative toxicity.

A complex relationship exists between  zinc  concentrations,
dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and calcium and magnesium
concentrations.  Prediction of harmful effects has been less
than   reliable   and   controlled  studies  have  not  been
extensively documented.

Concentrations of zinc in excess of 5 mg/1 in  public  water
supply  sources  cause  an  undesirable taste which persists
through conventional treatment.  Zinc can  have  an  adverse
effect on man and animals at high concentrations.

Observed values for the distribution of zinc in ocean waters
varies  widely.   The  major  concern with zinc compounds in
marine waters is not  one  of  actute  lethal  effects,  but
rather  one  of  the  long  term  sublethal  effects  of the
metallic compounds and complexes.  From the point of view of
accute lethal effects, invertebrate marine animals  seem  to
be the most sensitive organisms tested.
                                  73

-------
A  variety  of  freshwater  plants tested manifested harmful
symptoms at concentrations of 10  mg/1.   Zinc  sulfate  has
also  been  found  to  be lethal to many plants and it could
impair agricultural uses of the water.

Dissolved Solids

In  natural  waters,  the  dissolved   solids   are   mainly
carbonates,  chlorides,  sulfates,  phosphates,  and,  to  a
lesser extent, nitrates of calcium, magnesium,  sodium,  and
potassium,   with   traces  of  iron,  manganese  and  other
substances.

Many communities in the United States and in other countries
use  water  supplies  containing  2,000  to  4,000  mg/1  of
dissolved  salts,  when  no better water is available.  Such
waters are not palatable, may not  quench  thirst,  and  may
have a laxative action on new users.  Waters containing more
than  4,000  mg/1  of  total  salts are generally considered
unfit for human use, although in hot  climates  such  higher
salt  concentrations  can  be  tolerated.  Waters containing
5,000 mg/1 or more are reported to be bitter and  act  as  a
bladder  and  intestinal  irritant.   It is generally agreed
that the salt concentration of good, palatable water  should
not exceed 500 mg/1.

Limiting  concentrations of dissolved solids for fresh-water
fish may range from  5,000  to  10,000  mg/1,  depending  on
species and prior acclimatization.  Some fish are adapted to
living  in  more  saline waters, and a few species of fresh-
water forms have been found in natural waters  with  a  salt
concentration  of  15,000  to  20,000 mg/1.  Fish can slowly
become acclimatized to higher salinities, but fish in waters
of low salinity  cannot  survive  sudden  exposure  to  high
salinities,  such as those resulting from discharges of oil-
well brines.  Dissolved solids may influence the toxicity of
heavy metals and organic compounds to fish and other aquatic
life,  primarily  because  of  the  antagonistic  effect  of
hardness on metals.

Waters  with  total  dissolved  solids   (TDS) concentrations
higher than 500 mg/1 have decreasing utility  as  irrigation
water.   At  5,000  mg/1,  water  has  little or no value for
irrigation.

Dissolved  solids in industrial waters  can cause  foaming  in
boilers  and can cause interference with cleanliness, color,
or taste of many finished products.  High concentrations  of
dissolved  solids also tend to accelerate corrosion.
                                74

-------
Specific  conductance  is a measure of the capacity of water
to convey an electric current.  This property is related  to
the  total  concentration of ionized substances in water and
to the water temperature.  This property is frequently  used
as  a  substitute method of quickly estimating the dissolved
solids concentration.

Nitrogen Compounds

Ammonia nitrogen  (NH3-N) and total Kjeldahl  nitrogen  (TKN)
are  two parameters which have received a substantial amount
of interest in the last decade.  TKN is the sum of the NH3-N
and organic nitrogen present in the sample.   Both  NIO  and
TKN  are expressed in terms of equivalent nitrogen values in
mg/1 to facilitate mathematical manipulations of the values.

Organic nitrogen may be  converted  in  the  environment  to
ammonia  by  saprophytic  bacteria  under  either aerobic or
anaerobic conditions.  The ammonia nitrogen then becomes the
nitrogen  and  energy  source  for   autotrophic   organisms
 (nitrifiers).   The oxidation of ammonia to nitrite and then
to  nitrate  has  a  stoichiometric  oxygen  requirement  of
approximately  4.6  times  the  concentration of NH3-N.  The
nitrification reaction is much slower than the  carbonaceous
reactions,  and, therefore, the dissolved oxygen utilization
is observed over a much longer period.

Ammonia is a common product of the decomposition of  organic
matter.   Dead  and  decaying  animals and plants along with
human and animal body wastes account for much of the ammonia
entering the aquatic ecosystem.  Ammonia exists in its  non-
ionized  form only at higher pH levels and is the most toxic
in this state.  The lower the pH, the more  ionized  ammonia
is  formed  and  its  toxicity  decreases.   Ammonia, in the
presence of dissolved oxygen, is converted to nitrate  (NOJ3)
by   nitrifying   bacteria.   Nitrite   (NO2),  which  is  an
intermediate product between ammonia and nitrate,  sometimes
occurs  in quantity when depressed oxygen conditions permit.
Ammonia can exist in several  other  chemical  combinations,
including ammonium chloride and other salts.

Infant   methemoglobinemia,   a   disease  characterized  by
specific blood changes and cyanosis, may be caused  by  high
nitrate  concentrations  in  the  water  used  for preparing
feeding formulae.  While it is  still  impossible  to  state
precise concentration limits, it has teen widely recommended
that  water containing more than 10 mg/1 of nitrate nitrogen
 (NO3-N) should not be used for infants.
                               75

-------
Nitrates are also harmful in fermentation processes and  can
cause  disagreeable  tastes  in beer.  In most natural water
the pH range is such that ammonium ions (NH4+)  predominate.

In streams polluted with  sewage,  up  to  one-half  of  the
nitrogen  in  the sewage may be in the form of free ammonia,
and sewage may carry up to 35 mg/1 of  total  nitrogen.   It
has  been  shown  that  at  a  level of 1.0 mg/1 non-ionized
ammonia, the ability of hemoglobin to combine with oxygen is
impaired  and  may  cause  fish  to   suffocate.    Evidence
indicates that ammonia exerts a considerable toxic effect on
all aguatic life within a range of less than 1.0 to 25 mg/1,
depending on the pH and dissolved oxygen level present.

Ammonia   can  add  to  the  problem  of  eutrophication  by
supplying nitrogen through  its  breakdown  products.   Some
lakes in warmer climates, and others that are aging quickly,
are  sometimes  limited  by  the  nitrogen  available.   Any
increase will speed up the plant growth and decay process.

Sulfates

Sulfates occur  naturally  in  waters,  particulary  in  the
western  Unites States, as a result of leachings from gypsum
and other common materials.  They also occur  as  the  final
oxidized  state  of  sulfides,  sulfites  and  thiosulfates.
Sulfates may also  be  present  as  the  oxidized  state  of
organic  matter  in  the sulfur cycle, but they in turn, may
serve as sources of energy for sulfate  splitting  bacteria.
Sulfates  may  also  be  discharged  in  numerous industrial
wastes, such as those from  tanneries,  sulfate-pulp  mills,
textile  mills,  and  other  plants  that  use  sulfates  or
sulfuric acid.

In moderate concentrations, sulfates are not harmful and  it
has  been  reported  that concentrations up to  1000 mg/1 are
harmless.  Irrigation concentrations less than  336 mg/1  are
considered to be good to excellent.

Temperature

Temperature  is  one  of  the most important and influential
water quality characteristics.  Temperature determines  what
species  may be present; it activates the hatching of young,
regulates their activity, and stimulates or suppresses their
growth and development; it attracts, and may kill  when  the
water  becomes  too  hot  or  becomes  chilled  too suddenly.
Colder water generally suppresses development.  Warmer water
generally accelerates activity and may be a primary cause of
                                 76

-------
aquatic plant nuisances when other environmental factors are
suitable.

Temperature is a prime regulator of natural processes within
the water environment.  It governs  physiological  functions
in   organisms   and,   acting  directly  or  indirectly  in
combination with ether water quality  constituents,  affects
aquatic  life  with  each  change.   These  effects  include
chemical  reaction  rates,  enzymatic  functions,  molecular
movements,  and molecular exchanges between membranes within
and between the physiological systems and the organs  of  an
animal.

Chemical  reaction rates vary with temperature and generally
increase as the temperature is increased.  The solubility of
gases in water varies with temperature.  Dissolved oxygen is
decreased by the decay or decomposition of dissolved organic
substances, and the decay rate increases as the  temperature
of  the  water  increases,  reaching a maximum at about 30°C
(86°F).   The  temperature  of  stream  water,  even  during
summer,   is  below  the  optimum  for  pollution-associated
bacteria.  Increasing the water  temperature  increases  the
bacterial   multiplication  rate  when  the  environment  is
favorable and the food supply is abundant.

Reproduction  cycles  may  be   changed   significantly   by
increased  temperature  because  this  function  takes place
under restricted temperature ranges.

Spawning may not occur at  all  when  temperatures  are  too
high.   Thus,  a  fish population may exist in a heated area
only by continued immigration.  Disregarding  the  decreased
reproductive  potential,  water  temperatures need not reach
lethal levels to  decimate  a  species.   Temperatures  that
favor  competitors,  predators,  parasites,  and disease can
destroy a species at levels far below those that are lethal.

Fish food organisms are altered severely  when  temperatures
approach  or exceed 90°F.  Predominant algal species change;
primary  production  is  decreased;  and   bottom-associated
organisms  may be depleted or altered drastically in numbers
and distribution.  increased  water  temperature  may  cause
aquatic plant nuisances when othey environmental factors are
favorable.

Synergistic  actions of pollutants are more severe at higher
water temperatures.  Domestic sewage, refinery wastes, oils,
tars,  insecticides,  detergents,  and  fertilizers  deplete
oxygen in water more rapidly at higher temperatures, and the
respective toxicities are likewise increased.
                               77

-------
When  water  temperatures  increase,  the  predominant algal
species may change from diatoms, to green  algae,  then,  at
high  temperatures,  to  blue-green algae because of species
temperature  preferentials.   Blue-green  algae  can   cause
serious  odor  problems.   The  number  and  distribution of
benthic organisms decreases as water  temperature  increases
above  90°F,  which  is close to the tolerance limit for the
water's population.  This  could  seriously  affect  certain
fish that depend on benthic organisms as a food source.

The  cost of fish mortalities resulting from their returning
to cooler water after being attracted to  heated  waters  in
winter may be considerable.

Rising  temperatures  stimulate the decomposition of sludge,
formation  of  sludge  gas,  multiplication  of  saprophytic
bacteria  and fungi (particularly in the presence of organic
wastes), and  the  consumption  of  oxygen  by  putrefactive
processes,  thus  affecting  the  aesthetic value of a water
course.

In general, marine  water  temperatures  do  not  change  as
rapidly or range as widely as those of fresh waters.  Marine
and  estuarine  fishes,  therefore,  are  less  tolerant  of
temperature variation.  Although this limited  tolerance  is
greater  in  estuarine  than  in  open water marine species,
temperature changes are more important to  those  fishes  in
estuaries  and  bays  than  to  those  in open marine areas,
because of the nursery and replenishment  functions  of  the
estuary   that   can   be   adversely  affected  by  extreme
temperature changes.
Pollutants of Specific Significance

Review of RWL data indicates that the pollutants of  special
significance  to  gum and wood chemicals manufacturing point
source category are:  oil, phenol, total  dissolved  solids,
and  zinc.   Tables V-2 and V-3 contain RWL data for five of
the six  subcategories  (excluding  the  char  and  charcoal
briquet  subcategory, which involves no discharge of process
wastewater pollutants).

    Oil

Oil  RWL  data  for  the  following  subcategories   reflect
relatively  high concentrations.  The following RWL data are
summarized:
                                78

-------
                                               Oil
Subcategory                Product        RWL Concentration
                                                mq/1

    B              Gum Turpentine and Rosin     441

    D              Tall Oil, Pitch, and Fatty
                   Acids                        325

    F              Rosin Derivatives            356

The oil RWL consists mainly of oil of vegetable  origin  and
not  petroleum-based  free oil.  Oils of vegetable origin of
significant concentrations have been reported as  not  being
inhibitory to biological treatment.

         Phenol

The following are phenol RWL's which are found to be of
significance in this segment:

                                            Phenol
Subcategory              Product        RWL Concentration
                                             mg/1

    D               Tall Oil, Pitch,
                    and Fatty Acids           20.5

    F               Rosin Derivatives         61.5

Equalization  of  the wastewater before biological treatment
will minimize slug loads and the  consequent  inhibition  of
the  biological  population.   Acclimation  with time should
also reduce the impact of the phenol concentrations  in  the
RWL.

    Total Dissolved Solids

Dissolved  solids in gum and wood chemicals wastewaters vary
dramatically from one category tc another.  The following is
a summary of TDS, SO4, and Cl data:

Subcategory.       Product            RWL Concentration
                                  TDS        SOU       Cl
                                  mq/1       mq/1     mq/1

    B  Gum Turpentine & Rosin    3,640      254       189

    F  Rosin Derivatives         7,480       12.9     178
                               79

-------
    Metals

Metals such as zinc  were  found  in  the  wastewaters  from
Subcategories  B  and  F.   The  following zinc RWL data are
summarized from Table VI-1.

Subcategory       Product            Zinc RWL Concentration
                                                  mg/1

    B       Gum Turpentine and Rosin             15.5

    F       Rosin Derivatives                     6.80

The zinc in Subcategory F is attributed to catalyst  losses,
but  no  such  zinc  catalyst  is  used  in  Subcategory  B.
Consequently, it would appear that the presence of the  zinc
in Subcategory B indicates a cross-contamination between the
gum  turpentine and rosin derivative production areas within
one of the plants surveyed.
                                 80

-------
                        SECTION VII

             CONTEOL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Gen eral

The entire spectrum  of  wastewater  control  and  treatment
technology  is at the disposal of the gum and wood chemicals
segment.  The selection of technology options depends on the
economics of that technology and the magnitude of the  final
effluent  concentration.   Control  and treatment technology
may be divided into two major groupings:  in-plant pollution
abatement and end-of-pipe treatment.

After discussing the available performance data for each  of
the  subcategories  covered  under  gum  and wood chemicals,
conclusions will  be  made  relative  to  the  reduction  of
various  pollutants commensurate with the following distinct
technology levels:

    I.  Best Practicable Control Technology Currently
         Available  (BPT)
   II.  Best Available Technology Economically
          Achievable  (BAT)
  III.  Best Available Demonstrated Control Technology
           (NSPS)

To assess the economic impact  of  these  proposed  effluent
limitations  and guidelines on each of the industries, model
treatment systems have been proposed  which  are  considered
capable  of  attaining  the  recommended  RWL reduction.  It
should be noted and understood that the  particular  systems
were chosen for use in the economic analysis and are not the
only  systems  capable  of attaining the specified pollutant
reductions.

There are many possible combinations of in-plant and end-of-
pipe systems capable of attaining the effluent  limitations,
guidelines  and  standards  of performance suggested in this
report.  For economic practicalities,  and  because  of  its
general  applicability  to  all sufacategories, one treatment
model for the gum and wood chemicals  segment  is  shown  in
this text for each effluent level.

This  study  suggests  that  each  individual plant make the
final decision about what specific combination of  pollution
control   measures  is  best  suited  to  its  situation  in
                                  81

-------
complying with  the  effluent  limitations,  guidelines  and
standards presented in this report.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

    In-piant Pollution Abatement

A   significant   amount   of  pollution  abatement  can  be
accomplished by consistent adherence  to  good  housekeeping
practices.   The  gum and wood chemicals manufacturing point
source category is characterized by relatively sophisticated
process eguipment  which  has  been  developed  to  maximize
product  yield.   The  fact  that  a  number  of  the plants
discharge to municipal treatment  facilities  has  no  doubt
also influenced both water usage and pollutant levels.

Water  management and plant age are the two major factors to
be considered when discussing in-plant pollution  abatement.
Generally, the manufacturers practice good water management.
However,  instances  of poor water management were observed,
with resulting high  wastewater  flows.   Age  of  equipment
primarily   has  an  impact  on  the  cost-effectiveness  of
modifying process equipment  to  minimize  pollution  or  to
segregate storm and process wastewaters.

Since  it  is not possible, at the present time, to quantify
the effects  of  water  management  and  equipment  age,  in
specific terms, these factors should be handled on a case by
case  basis.   This is particularly feasible in light of the
fact that less than five percent of the plants  in  the  gum
and wood chemicals segment discharge to surface waters.

Some  in-plant  techniques that should be utilized to reduce
the raw waste flow internally are:

1.  Segregate discharge lines  to  reduce  the  quantity  of
    wastewater   to  be  treated.   This  includes  separate
    drainage systems for process water, sanitary wastewater,
    non-contact water, and storm water.  Replace old  piping
    and pumping systems with new ones.

2.  Instead of  simply  filling  and  draining  vessels  and
    lines,  use  a  small controlled rinsing with subsequent
    recycling of the rinse into the process.  As pointed out
    earlier in this document,  careful  control  of  washing
    operations substantially reduces the RWL.

3.  Where controlled rinsing  of  tanks  is  not  practical,
    manual  squeegeeing  of  clingage  before rinsing can be
    practiced.
                                 82

-------
                              Table VI I -1

                       Treatment Technology  Survey
Type of Treatment or Disposal Facility

Physical/Chemical - Aerated Lagoon -
   Oxidation Pond

Oil/Water Separation - Trickling
   Filter - Oxidation Pond1

Lime Treatment (Odor Control) -
   Evaporation Pond

To Municipal Treatment Plant -
   No Pretreatment

To Municipal Treatment Plant -
   Pretreatment  includes equalization,
   neutralization, and filtration

Wastewaters Drummed and Sent to
   Industrial Landfill

No discharge of process wastewater  pollutants
     TOTAL
 Plant     No. of Plants
Code No.     Observed
   59
   52


   58



   55


   57

   51
      Trickling Filter was not operational during the field survey, nor
      was performance data available for the historic period reported  in
      Table VIIB-3.
                                   83                                4/30/76

-------



































(D
4->
<0
Q
>~
0)
CM <-
1 3
CO
—
> C
ID
0) —
— O_
-Q
(D 4->
1— C
0)
E
4-1
(D
(U
u
1 —












4-1
C
-o
c 
3 —1
— ^
<4- CD
M- E
LU

C
0) -1
3 -x
— O>
M- E
M-
LU
4-1
C
0) -I
3 \
— 01
M- E
v»-
LLj
4-> •—
C (D
(U >
0 O
^ c
0) 0)
o_ oe
4-J
C
a) -i
3 \
— o>
M- E
1,1^
LU


VO
•
CM CN





C-O 1
O |
CM 1





OO CM
•H

r^ n
• •
VD VO
•3" O%






0 O
I- E
0) (U
Q- o:

n cr»
• •
oo vo
VO O>

1 1




LT>
Q
O
CD







c
(U -1
3 ' —
— 01
M— E
M-
LU

oo
•
— ro
p^




4-> —
C CO
0) >
o o
1_ E
(U 0)
0_ DC

(^ ^*
* •
r~- in
en en








O
o






4-1
c
(1)
3 —1
j 	 ^S.
«4- 01
li CZ
^^ t
UJ


cr»
oo m
ff\ pM
r» » ^j*
r-l

4-> •—
C (D
0) >
0 O
s- E
(1) (U
Q- Q£


cn in
* •
» 

4-1  (A

 <"
 (0 CO
m  o
                     pq
        a.
        o
        o
        Q_
         cr>
         LTV
                      ft?
                                                                                               vo
                                                                                               o
                                                                                               n
                                                                               c
                                                                               CO
                                                                               Q.


                                                                               O
                                                                                            6
                                                                                0)
                                                                                o
                                                                                c
                     CN
                      ro
                      in


                     84

-------
                                          0)
-Q
 10
H-
        O
        c
        TO
        K
^«
•—
ro
a

,_^
en
c <~~*
O in
— -C
4_l 4-1
ro c
i- o
3 E
Q - —
3
^f
I
>^
^~
3
— >
'
CM






(/)
to
1-










Lf>
O
o
CO










a
o
o






4-1
C
CO -J
3 ^^
•— OT
M- E
14—
LLt


CM
•
CsJ



4-J — •
c ro

o o

u o
i_, g

0 O
L- E
<1> (U
a. o;
o
cn
1 
3 ro
to u
4-1
C

1- IO
1-
4-1
c •
ro o
a.



1





O



a.
o
'
<£
I
O
Q-

cn
LTV


0
•z.
1
4->
Q-
(U
to
' — '
fO




o
ur\




i





JS.^
CO
^—





o
CTv



O
v^
CO





I





t >






,5;
I
O
Q-

U^

cu

«^
tf)
0
a.

Q
O
CO
^^ ~~~
— CL

ro ro
Q tO

, 	 ,
C71
3

1
a)
c
3
-J
« — '
ro




o
LA




i





CO
OO






vO




0

-^
CM


crt
•
(V^
UA




*— i








i
<
CM
rH

(U
4-1
•«-
(/)
o
O-
E
O
o

O
•z.
*~*
CM




0
CO




1





O
-3-




OO
•
CO
cn



0
cn






CO
cn




o





—!
i
LU
^^
a
CM
i— H
CO
                                                                               ro
                                                                               CO
                                                                                                                      cn
                                                                                                                      O

                                                                                                                     "o

                                                                                                                     -D

                                                                                                                      CO

                                                                                                                      TO
                                                                                                                      U
                                                                                                                      in

                                                                                                                     _c
                                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                                      c.
                                                                                                                      (U
                                                                                                                     -D


                                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                             TJ
                                                                                                              <0
                                                                                                              CL
                                                                                                              O

                                                                                                             "a;

                                                                                                              
                                                                                                         c    o —
                                                                                                         0)    O.TJ
                                                                                                         E    03
                                                                                                                TO
                                                                                                                (U
                                                                                ID
                                                                                IT)
                                                                                                         TO

                                                                                                         O.

                                                                                                         i
                                                                                                         X
                                                                                                        LU    C
                                                                                                      t—   CM
 CL in

 in  >-
•-  4->
 in  —
 ro  —

    -D
 c  ro
 cn 4-<
—  TO
 in  o>
 0)  l-
                                                                                                                                                    n
                                                                                                                                               c
                                                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                                                               TO
 a>         —
.-         LU
M-   e TJ
._   o  c  >-
 i_   o  O —
 re   cno- <
—   TO
O  -J  C TJ
        O  0)
L-
TO

..^
U
TJ
C

Z
_l
0-

1
o
CL.

<0
+J
fB
l_
(U
<

i
_i
<

4->
TO
TJ
•— '
X
O

1
0-
o

_
0
in
in

O

I
Lu
<
O
                                                                85

-------
4.  Pipelines and pumping systems,  where the rinse cannot be
    reworked or recycled, may be blown out with  an  air  or
    inert gas to purge clingage in the final rinse.

5.  Recirculate and reuse cleaning water and rinse water  by
    treating the water to remove solids.  Implement recovery
    systems  for -by-products from the process stream.   Good
    recovery  practices  depend  on  segregated   collection
    systems,     proper    plant    piping   systems,   good
    housekeeping, and employee awareness.

    End-of-Pipe Treatment

During the study, seven plants in the gum and wood chemicals
segment were visited  and  sampled  and  a  summary  of  the
treatment  technology  observed is presented in Table VII-1.
Six other plants were surveyed via telephone and/or letters,
three  of  which  were  charcoal  briquet  plants  that  had
achieved  no  discharge.  Plants 59 and 54 provide their own
wastewater treatment facilities,  while  Plants  58  and  55
discharge  to municipal treatment plants after pretreatment.
A final plant had an EPA grant ongoing to study  the  effect
of  carbon sorpticn treatment to naval stores aqueous waste.
Although in a draft state, this report is utilized to define
the BAT and NSPS treatment models.  The report documents the
results of 3 years of research and development activities of
a manufacturer in this category in conjunction with the  EPA
on  advance waste treatment of wastewaters generated in this
manufacturing activity.

    Biological Treatment

During the plant survey program, 24-hour  composite  samples
were  obtained  to  verify historical performance data which
were made available by the plants.  The results of the plant
survey data are presented in Table VII-2.  Plant No. 59  had
experienced  a  shutdown before the plant visit resulting in
the measurement of abnormally high organic removals.   Since
the  initial  survey  was  completed  plant  54 has put into
operaton a biological treatment system that removes 95% BOD5_
from the raw waste streams.

The historical wastewater treatment plant  performance  data
obtained  from  Plants  No.  59,  56 and 54 are presented in
Table VII-3.  The amount of data  used  in  the  performance
evaluation  is  indicated  in  the Data Base column of Table
VII-3.  Influent pollutant concentrations were not  recorded
for Plant No. 59; therefore, it was not possible to quantify
its  removal  efficiency.   The historical data reported for
Plant No. 54 was the design basis proposed in  a  consulting
                                86

-------
engineer* s  report  which  was  developed  from  bench scale
biological treatability studies.  Plant 56 is an example  of
an  operational  treatment  system that is achieving 93% BOD
and 84% COD removal today.

Table VII-3 also contains design criteria proposed  for  two
plants producing tall oil by-products, which were summarized
from  two  other  individual  consulting engineers'  reports.
The design criteria in these  reports  were  also  developed
from  bench scale biological treatability studies simulating
aerated lagoon technology.  Pilot plants A and  B  were  not
visited  during  the  field  survey  program;  however,  the
information is pertinent and was therefore included in  this
plant  evaluation phase.  These data represent the levels of
pollution abatement that are obtainable  from  the  gum  and
wood chemicals manufacturing point source category.

The relative biodegradability of the wastewaters from Plants
No,   54,  A  and  B  were  compared  using  a  mathematical
formulation for BODji removal rate and loading ratios. 1   The
results   of  the  comparison  indicated  that  these  three
wastewaters had relatively similar BOD5  removal  rates  and
therefore  could  be  equitable compared in an evaluation of
exemplary treatment plants.

Based on the previous analysis and the performance  data  in
Table VII-3, it was concluded that Plants 54, 56 A and B are
exemplary  in  this  segment  and that the following average
reductions can be achieved by exemplary treatment plants:
                 COD removal
                 BOD5 removal
                 Effluent TSS
73 percent
90 percent
50 mg/1
1 Process Design Manual for  Upgrading  Existing  Wastewater
Treatment  Plants.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency.
October 1974, pp. 5-22.
    Biological Treatment Plant Effluent Filtration

Filtration of biological treatment  plant  effluent  is  one
method  of  providing  supplemental  removal  of  solids and
organic material.  In addition, the use of  polishing  ponds
after  biological  treatment  is  a common method in the in-
dustrial wastewater treatment field  for  reducing  effluent
pollutants.
                                87

-------
BODJ3  is  reduced by filtration mostly by removing suspended
solids.  Therefore, the percentage reduction of BOD5_ will be
significantly affected by the suspended solids level in  the
treated effluent to be filtered.

The  following  analysis was developed to equitably quantify
the  expected  BODji  reduction  attributable  to  biological
treatment plant effluent filtration:

                 Plant No. 54            Calculated
             Bilogical Treatment      Filtration Effluent
Pollutant    Effluent Design Data     From Plant No. 54
   (mg/1)

Total   BODS           187                       172
Soluble BODS           162                       162
Suspended BODS          25                        10

TSS                     50                        20

The  data  for  previous  biological  treatment effluent are
taken  from Table VII-3 and the consulting engineer's  report
referred to therein.  The calculated effluent concentrations
were   determined by calculations based on 60 percent removal
of the TSS and the corresponding  suspended  BOD  component,
resulting  in  an overall BODS reduction of 8 percent.  This
60 percent removal  factor  is  based  on  the  contractor's
experience   in  filtration  of  industrial  wastewaters  at
typical effluent TSS levels  under  discussion  and  similar
studies  completed  in  the  petroleum  refining  and  grain
milling point source categories.

A  corresponding analysis  was performed using  COD  data  and
the results are shown below:

                                  Calculated
                 Plant No. 54     Filtration Effluent
Pollutant(mg/l   Survey Data      From Plant No. 54	

Total  COD            590               510
Soluble COD          457               457
Suspended COD        133                53


Soluble  COD  data  were  not  available to correspond to the
BOD5 values used in the previous analysis; therefore, survey
data from Table VII-2 were used.  An overall  COD   reduction
of  13 percent  or  better  are  obtainable with the use of
effluent filtration based on the contractor's experience and
similar treatment  models  developed  for the grain milling and
                              88

-------
o
•H
•M
     a.
   i-i
   rt
   CJ
OS
00

O
o
o
     trt
   CD G

B^J§
•J "d JH
   0) OS
 • > u
w o
LQ g  .
                 oo
                                                                                         o
                                                                                         oo
                 en
                 LO
          a>
          0)
     0)
     I— I

     •§
     i-H
     I
     w
                                    g,


                                    oo
                                    6
   (1)
  r-l

  -§
  rH


  *n

  ^8

   S
                                    O)
                                    •H

                                    in
                                    (I)
                                    V)

                                    O
                LO
                                    4)
                                    in


                                    1
                             89

-------
petroleum  refining  point  source  categories.    Dual-media
filtration can effectively reduce the suspended solids up to
80  percent  of  the influent concentration.  Based on these
studies but  because  of  transfer  of  technology,  a  more
conservative  design basis of 50 percent should be chosen as
the  achievable  concentration  for  NSPS  suspended  solids
limitations.

In  summary, it is expected that the application of effluent
filtration to  biological  treatment  would  result  in  the
following average reductions:

              COD removal  -  13 percent
              BODS removal  -  8 percent
              Effluent TSS  -25 mg/1

    Carbon Adsorption

During the plant survey program, a sample of treatment plant
effluent from Plant No. 54 was evaluated by determination of
the  carbon  sorption isotherm.  The results of the isotherm
are presented in  Table  VII-4.   The  maximum  soluble  COD
removal  was  99 percent, which corresponds to an exhaustion
rate of 0.59 pounds COD/ pound  carbon.   During  the  naval
stores   wastewater  treatment  purification  and  reuse  by
activated  carbon  treatment   study,   overall   reductions
obtained were:

    Parameter                   % Removal

      COD                        95.5
      TOC                        96.9
      BOD5.                       95.4
      S3                         96.3
      Oil and Grease             99.6

These  values  compare  quite  well with the carbon sorption
isotherm results at the other plant site.

    BPT Treatment Systems

Biological  treatment plant data  was  reviewed  so  that  it
would  be possible to quantify BPT reduction factors.  These
factors, applied to standard raw waste load figures for each
subcategory,  make  it  possible  to  generate   recommended
effluent    limitations   and   guidelines.    The   previous
discussions  of  biological  treatment  indicate   that   the
following   pollutant  reduction  factors are consistent with
BPT treatment technology:
                                  90

-------
                      Reduction Factors
                   Applied to Average BPT
    Parameter        	RWL	
     BOD5>                90 percent
     COD                  73 percent
     TSS                  50 mg/1
^Controlling Parameter.

The BPT effluent discharge recommendations will be made  for
BOD5,  COD  and  TSS.  The major source of TSS in biological
treatment plant effluents is biological solids generated  in
the  treatment  plant.  A properly operated activated sludge
treatment system followed by good clarification can  achieve
a  limit  of  less  than 20 mg/1 but due to the limited data
base, the average value demonstrated to be achievable by the
exemplary plants, 50  mg/1,  will  form  the  basis  of  the
recommendation for TSS.

    NSPS Treatment Systems

Based  on  the  previous  discussion of biological treatment
plant effluent filtration,  the  following  equitable  waste
reduction   factors   commensurate   with   NSPS   treatment
technology have been developed:

                                Reduction Factors
                                Applied to BPT
              Parameter        Effluent Limitations

                BCD1                8 percent
                COD                13 percent
                TSS                25 mg/1
Controlling Parameter.

    BAT Treatment Systems

The  quantity  and  quality  of  the  data   available   for
establishing  BAT  reduction  factors  for  the gum and wood
chemicals manufacturing point  source  category  is  sparse.
Data  recently  available  from  a  draft  of  an EPA funded
demonstration grant by the Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory described above, has shown that carbon adsorption
pretreated by an equalization basis, flotation to remove oil
and grease and pH adjustment is able to  remove  significant
amounts  of pollutants before entering the receiving waters.
Based on this study and carbon sorption isotherm  test,  BAT
technology has been developed.
                                91

-------
                     Reduction Factors
                       Applied to BPT
           Parameter      Effluent Limitation

              BOD            70 percent
              COD            70 percent
              TSS            10 mg/1

To  assess  the  economic  impact  of  the proposed effluent
standards,  a  model   biological   treatment   system   was
developed.   The  end-of-pipe  treatment  model was designed
based on raw waste load (RWL) data  for  the  gum  and  wood
chemicals  category.   The  primary design parameter in BPT,
NSPS and BAT treatment models is BODJ5 removal.

The use of a biological treatment model is done  to  facili-
tate  the economic analysis and is not to be inferred as the
only technology capable of meeting the effluent limitations,
guidelines and standards of performance  presented  in  this
report.
                                92

-------
                        SECTION VIII

         COST, ENERGY, AND NONWATER QUALITY ASPECTS
General

Quantitative  cost information for the suggested end-of-pipe
treatment models is presented in  the  following  discussion
for  the  purpose  of  assessing  the economic impact of the
proposed effluent limitations and guidelines.   An  economic
analysis  of  treatment  cost  impact will be available in a
separate document.

In order to evaluate the economic impact of treatment  on  a
uniform  basis,  end-of-pipe  treatment  models  which  will
provide the desired level of  treatment  were  proposed  for
each industrial subcategory.  In-plant control measures have
not  been  evaluated  because the cost, energy, and nonwater
quality aspects of in-plant controls are intimately  related
to  the  specific  processes  for  which they are developed.
Although there are general cost and energy requirements  for
equipment items, these correlations are usually expressed in
terms   of   specific   design  parameters  related  to  the
production rate  and  other  specific  considerations  at  a
particular production site.

In  the  manufacture  of  a  single  product there is a wide
variety of process plant sizes and  unit  operations.   Many
detailed  designs  might be required to develop a meaningful
understanding   of   the   economic   impact   of    process
modifications.   Such a development is really not necessary,
however, because  the  end-of-pipe  models  are  capable  of
attaining  the recommended effluent limitations at the RWL1s
found to  exist  within  the  subcategories.   A  series  of
designs  for end-of-pipe treatment models has been provided.
These can be related  directly  to  the  range  of  influent
hydraulic  and  organic loadings.  The costs associated with
these systems can be divided by the production rate for  any
given  subcategory to show the economic impact of the system
in terms of dollars per pound of product.   The  combination
of  in-plant  controls  and  end-of-pipe  treatment  used to
attain the effluent limiations guidelines presented in  this
document  should  be a decision made by the individual plant
based upon economic considerations specific to that site.

The major nonwater quality consideration associated with in-
plant control measures is the means of ultimate disposal  of
wastes.   As  the  quantity  of  the process RWL is reduced,
alternative  disposal  techniques  such   as   incineration.
                                 93

-------
pyrolysis,   evaporation,  ocean  discharge,   and  deep-well
injection become more feasible.   Recent regulations tend  to
limit  the  use  of  ocean discharge and deep-well injection
because  of  the  potential  long-term  detrimental  effects
associated with these disposal procedures.  Incineration and
evaporation  are  viable alternatives for concentrated waste
streams.   Considerations  involving   air   pollution   and
auxiliary  fuel reguirements, depending on the heating value
of the  waste,  must  be  evaluated  individually  for  each
situation.

Other nonwater quality aspects such as noise levels will not
be perceptibly affected by the proposed wastewater treatment
systems.   Most  chemical  plants generate fairly high noise
levels.  Equipment associated with in-plant and  end-of-pipe
control  systems  would not add significantly to these noise
levels.

Extensive  annual  and  capital  cost  estimates  have  been
prepared  for  the  end-of-pipe  treatment  models  for each
subcategory to help evaluate  the  economic  impact  of  the
proposed  effluent  limitations and guidelines.  The capital
costs  were  generated  on  a  unit  process  basis    (e.g.,
equalization,  neutralization, etc.) and are reported in the
form of cost curves in Supplement A  for  all  the  proposed
treatment  systems.   The  following percentage figures were
added on to the total unit  process  costs  to  develop  the
total capital cost requirements:

                              Percent of Unit Process
            Item              	Capital Cost

     Electrical                                 14
     Piping                                     20
     Instrumentation                             8
     Site Work                                   6
     Engineering Design and Construction
       Surveillance Fees                        15
     Construction Contingency                   15

Land costs were computed independently and added directly to
the total capital costs.

Annual costs were computed using the following cost basis:

         Item                    Cost Allocation

Capital Recovery
plus Return             10 yrs at  10 percent
                                94

-------
Operations and
    Maintenance
Energy and Power
Includes labor and supervision,
chemicals, sludge hauling and dis-
posal, insurance and taxes (computed
at 2 percent of the capital cost),
and maintenance (computed at 4 per-
cent of the capital cost).

Based on $0.02/kw hr for electrical
power and 170/gal for grade 11
furnace oil.
The  10-year  period used for capital recovery is acceptable
under   current   Internal   Revenue   Service   regulations
pertaining to industrial pollution control equipment.

The  following  is  a  gualitative as well as a quantitative
discussion  of  the  possible  effects  that  variations  in
treatment  technology  or  design criteria could have on the
total capital costs and annual costs.
    Technology or Design Criteria

1.  Use aerated lagoons and
    sludge de-watering lagoons
    in place of the proposed
    treatment system.

2.  Use earthen basins with
    a plastic liner in place
    of reinforced concrete con-
    struction, and floating
    aerators with permanent-
    access walkways.

3.  Place all treatment tankage
    above grade to minimize
    excavation, especially if
    a pumping station is re-
    quired in any case.  Use
    all-steel tankage to
    minimize capital cost.

4.  Minimize flows and maximize
    concentrations through ex-
    tensive in-plant recovery and
    water conservation, so that
    other treatment technologies,
    e.g., incineration, may be
                    Capital
               Cost Differential

             The cost reduction
             could be 20 to 40 per-
             cent of the proposed
             figures.

             Cost reduction could
             be 20 to 30 percent
             of the total cost.
             Cost savings would
             depend on the in-
             dividual situation.
             Cost differential would
             depend on a number of
             items, e.g., age of
             plant, accessibility
             to process piping,
             local air pollution
                               95

-------
    economically competitive.        standards, etc.
All cost data were computed in terms of August 1972 dollars,
which corresponds to an Engineering News Records (ENR)  index
value of 1980.

This section provides guantitative cost information relative
to  assessment  of  the  economic  impact  of  the  proposed
effluent  limitations  and  guidelines  on  the gum and wood
chemicals  segment  of  the  miscellaneous  chemicals  point
source category.

In  order  to  evaluate  the  economic  impact  on a uniform
treatment basis, end-of-pipe treatment models were  proposed
which will provide the desired level of treatment:

                             End-of-Pipe
    Technology Level         Treatment Model

         BPT              Activated Sludge.

         NSPS               Activated Sludge and Filtration.

         BAT               Activated Sludge, Filtration,
                             and Carbon Adsorption.

The   combination   of  in-plant  controls  and  end-of-pipe
treatment  used  to  attain  the  effluent  limitations  and
guidelines  is  left  up  to  the individual manufacturer to
choose on the basis of cost-effectiveness.

    BPT Cost Model

To evaluate the economic effects of BPT effluent limitations
and guidelines it was necessary to formulate a BPT treatment
cost model, which is based on an  activated  sludge  system.
The  proposed  model  for  subcategories C and D is shown in
Figure VIII-1 and for subcategories B, E and F is  shown  in
Figure  VIII-1A.  A summary of the general design basis used
to size the unit processes is presented in Table VIII-1.

The  following  is  a  brief  discussion  of  the  treatment
technology  available and the rationale for selection of the
unit processes to be included in  the  BPT  waste  treatment
model.

As  shown  in  Figure  VIII-1 for sufccategories C and D, for
critical unit operations, two  units   are  proposed  in  the
model.    This   is  to  ensure  operating  flexibility  and
                                  96

-------
_   _l O
^    j
CD    UJ
U_   1- L_
                                                                                    97

-------
c
0)
3
                                                                                                o
                                                                                                n
>
UJ
DC
                                                                                  LL

                                                                                  UJ

                                                                                  03

                                                                                  C/J
                                                                                  UJ

                                                                                  DC

                                                                                  O
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  LU
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  00
                                                                                  D
                                                                                  CO
                                                                                  _l
                                                                                  UJ
                                                                                  Q
                                                                                  O
                                                                                  CO
                                                                                  O
                                                                                  O

                                                                                  <
                                                                                  o

                                                                                  o
                                                                                  Q-
                                                                                  QQ
             98

-------
reliability.  Total wastewater flows are  characteristically
low,  generally  less  than 200,000 gpd.  The parallel-train
design is not normally used for treatment plants in the very
low flow range  because  of  economic  considerations.    For
subcategories  B, E and Fr which have low flow, provision is
made  for  single  treatment  units  with  adequate  holding
capacity.  However, standby items should be provided for key
process functions.

The  topography  of  a  particular  plant  site will dictate
whether pumping is required.   Equalization  facilities  are
provided to minimize short interval (hourly)  fluctuations in
the  organic  loading to the treatment plant to absorb loads
from reactor cleanouts, accidental spills, and  other  heavy
loads,   and   to   minimize  the  usage  of  neutralization
chemicals.  Equalization will provide for continuous  (seven
days   per  week)  operation  of  the  wastewater  treatment
facilities even though the manufacturing facilities  operate
only five days a week.

Since  many wastewater streams are of low pH, neutralization
may be necessary.  Alkaline neutralization  is  provided  in
the  form  of  hydrated lime storage and feed facilities for
subcategories C and D and in the form of caustic  soda  feed
for   subcategories   B,   E  and  F.   Since  some  of  the
subcategories have high oil  RWL  concentrations,  dissolved
air flotation was recommended for subcategories C and D.

An  activated sludge process was selected for the biological
treatment portion of the system.  However, many of  the  gum
and  wood  chemical  plants  are located in the southeastern
United States, where aerated lagoons could provide a  viable
treatment alternative.  However, to make the subsequent cost
estimates  more  broadly  applicable,  activated  sludge was
selected.

The sludge handling scheme proposed in  Figures  VIII-1  and
VIII-1A   were   developed   to   handle  anticipated  small
quantities of sludge.  The aerobic digester will  provide  a
nonputrescible  sludge  which  can  be  thickened and stored
before being trucked for  either  land  spreading  or  to  a
regional treatment facility for dewatering.

    BAT Cost Model

For  the  purpose  of  the economic evaluation of BAT it was
necessary to formulate BAT waste treatment models, which are
presented in Figures VIII-2  and  VIII-2A.   The  model  for
subcategories   C   and  D  includes  dual-media  filtration
followed by carbon adsorption of the BPT  biological  treat-
                               99

-------
       LU
CM
o

Q
Z.
     CO  UJ
       f"3  I-H
LU     o  cr
OC         C
-)     <  cr
^     I Ll  I iJ
             .
       CQ  <_>
           CQ
           c/5
                                                     ^. DC  _J
                                                     CQ I-  Q-
                                                             100

-------
                                                                                 o
                                                                                 §
                                                <
                                                CM
                                                UJ
                                                cc.
                                                D
                                                O
UJ

CD
CO
LU

cc.
o
u
UJ

<
o
CO
LU
Q
o
                                                        CO
                                                        o
                                                        o
                                                        <
                                                        LU
101

-------
ment plant effluent.  The BAT model for the subcategories B,
E and F consist of BPT treatment with addition of dual-media
filtration  and  addition of powdered carbon to the aeration
basin.  A summary of the general design tasis used  to  size
the unit processes is presented in Table VIII-2.

Dual-media  filtration  was  selected  for the BAT treatment
model to reduce suspended solids in the biological  effluent
and  to  protect  the carbon columns.  The pulsed bed upflow
carbon system was selected for  subcategories  C  and  D  to
minimize  capital  investment for a system with a relatively
high carbon exhaustion rate compared to  the  carbon  column
inventory.

The  BAT waste treatment model in Figures VIII-2 and VIII-2A
show  the  exhausted  carbon  being  hauled  to  a  sanitary
landfill.   This  is  because the amount of carbon exhausted
per day is generally less  than  500  pounds/day,  which  is
considered below the break-even point for on-site carbon re-
generation.   Regeneration  by  the carbon supplier on a fee
basis will reduce this cost  and  the  costs  presented  are
therefore quite conservative.

    NSPS Cost Model

The  evaluation of the economic effects of the NSPS effluent
limitations, guidelines and new source performance standards
necessitated the formulation of a treatment  model  using  a
dual-media  filtration  treatment  system.  A summary of the
general design basis and proposed model is presented in  the
previous discussion on BAT treatment systems.

    Cost

Capital  and  annual  cost estimates were prepared for these
end-of-pipe  treatment  models   for   five   of   the   six
subcategories.   Subcategory A has a no discharge of process
wastewater pollutants limitation and  therefore  end-of-pipe
treatment  was  not applicable.  The prepared cost estimates
are presented in Tables VIII-3 through VIII-7.  The detailed
cost  breakdown  by  unit  processes  are  included  in  the
supporting cost document  (Supplement A).

The  costs  presented  in these tables  are incremental costs
for achieving each  technology level.  For example, in  Table
VIII-4,   the  total capital cost for biological  treatment to
attain BPT effluent limitations and guidelines  is  shown  to
be  $1,390,000 for  a plant producing 114,000 Ibs/day of wood
turpentine and rosin.  The BPT effluent limitations in Table
VIII-4 were determined using the reduction factors presented
                                 102

-------
UJ
cc
        01
        Q
        O
CO
O
O
        O
        Q
        <
        DQ
                                 O)
                                 c
                   T
                                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                                               ro
                                               o  e
                                              O  w
                                              '5> E
                                              o  15
                                              o  «
                                              S  H
                                                        103

-------
                             Table VI I I  -1

                BPCTCA Treatment System Design Summary
Subcategory                         Treatment System Hydraulic Loading
                                       (Capacities covered, in gpd)

    B                                               3,020
    C                                             130,000
    D                                             133,000,
    E                                               7,960
    F                                               2,330
Pump Stat ion

Pumping Station is provided for subcategories C and D only.  Capacity to
handle 200 percent of the average daily flow.  Stand-by capability included,
with minimum pump motor of 1/4 hp.

Equalizat ion

One day detention time is provided for subcategories B,C and F.  Two days
are provided for subcategory E.  Three days are provided for subcategory D.
The basins are not provided with mixers to prevent oil  and grease emulsi-
fication.  For subcategories B,E, and F baffles and manually oil skimming
are provided.

Neutralization

The two-stage neutralization basin for subcategory D is sized on the basis
of a minimum detention time of 30 minutes.  The lime-handling facilities
are sized to provide 1,000 Ibs of hydrated lime per MGD of wastewater for
pH adjustment as needed in subcategory D.   For subcategories B,E, and F,
caustic soda addition from a carboy directly into the pipe line from
the Equalization Basin is provided.  Subcategory C requires no adjustment.
Bag storage is provided for all plants.  Lime/caustic addition is controlled
by pH probes.  In case of subcategory D,  the lime slurry is added to the
neutralization basin from a lime slurry recircu1ation loop.  The lime-
handling facilities are enclosed in a building.

Ai r Flotation

The air flotation units recommended for subcategories C and D are designed
for oil and grease removal.  They are sized on a rise rate of 1.5 gpm/ft^
including recycle of 75 percent with a minimum 40 minute detention time.
Air is provided for the units at a rate of 1.5 scf per 100 gallon recycle
at 50 psig.
 Equalized flow is 5,680 gpd.
                               104                                4/30/76

-------
                    Table VIII -1
                     (continued)
Nutrient Addition

    Facilities are provided for the addition of phosphoric
acid and aqua ammonia for subcategories C and D and
additional phosphate for subcategories B, E and F to the
biological system in order to maintain the ratio of BOD:N:P
at 100:5:1.

Aeration Basin

    Platform-mounted mechanical aerators are provided in the
aeration basin.  In addition, walkways are provided to all
aerators for access and maintenance.  The following data were
used in sizing the aerators:
       Energy oxygen
       Endogenous oxygen
       Field Oxygen Transfer
0.8 Ib 02/lb BOD removal
6   Ib 02/hr 1,000 Ib MLVSS
2.0 Ib 02/hp-hr
    Oxygen is monitored in the basins using D.O probes.  All
aeration basins are sized using kinetics developed from
treatability data for plants 2, A, B  (see Table VII-3).

Secondary Clarifiers

    All secondary clarifiers are rectangular units with a
length-to width ratio of 4 to 1.  The overflow rate varies
between 40 and 400 gpd/sq. ft. depending on plant size.
Sludge recycle pumps are sized to deliver 100 percent  of
the average flow.

Aerobic Digester

    The aerobic digester is sized on the basis of a hydraulic
detention time of 20 days.  The sizing of the aerator-mixers
is based on 165 hp per million gallons of digester volume.

Sludge Holding Tank - Thickener

    A sludge-holding tank is provided for all plants,  with
sufficient capacity to hold 7 days flow from the aerobic
digester.  Facilities are included for discharge to tank
trucks for hauling and disposal.
                             105

-------
                            Table VI I I  -2

          BATEA End-of-Pipe Treatment  System Design Summary


Subcateqory                            Treatment System Hydraulic Loading
                                          (capacities covered, in gpd)

    B                                               3,020
    C                                             130,000
    D                                             133,000
    E                                               7,960'
    F                                               2,330

Dual Media Filtration

The filters are sized on the basis of  an average hydraulic loading of
2 gpm/sq. ft.  Backwash facilities are  sized to provide rates up to 20 gpm/
sq. ft. and for a total backwash cycle  of up to 20 minutes in duration.
The filter media are 2k" of coal (1mm  effective size) and 12" of sand
(0.4-0.5 mm effective size).

Subcateqories C and D

Granular Carbon Columns

The carbon columns are sized on a hydraulic loading of k gpm/sq. ft. and a
column detention time of 40 minutes.  A backwash rate of 20 gpm/sq. ft. was
assumed for kQ percent bed expansion at 70°F.

Backwash Holding Tank

Tankage is provided to hold the backwash water and decant it back to the
treatment plant over a 24-hour period.   This will  eliminate hydraulic
surging to the treatment units.

Vjrgin/Exhausted Carbon Storage

Tankage is provided to handle the virgin and exhausted carbon.  A carbon
exhaustion capacity of 0.6 Ibs. COD/lb. carbon was used for design.  The
quantities of carbon exhausted based on the previous exhaustion capacity
are not sufficiently large enough to warrant the investment in a re-
generation furnace.  For this reason the exhausted carbon is disposed of
in a sanitary landfill as indicated in  Figure VIIB-2.

Subcateqories B.E. and F

Powdered Carbon

Powdered carbon addition directly into the aeration basin is provided for
the subcategories B,E, and F.  One day  capacity hopper for powdered carbon,
helix volumetric feeder, and vortex eductor are provided.
A building to house carbon feed facilities and to store powdered carbon
bags is provided.  The carbon will be  recycled and wasted along with the
biological sludge.

 Equalized flow is 5,680 gpd.


                                106                              4/30/76

-------
                            H-
                                                 Ill
                                                 i   i   i
                                                                             CN
                                                                                     COO
                                                                                                           O O  O O O  rA
                                                                                                           ooooo
                                                                                                           r-  I—  CM     LA

                                                                                                           r-     «-     CM

                   Ot_>
                   ^-Q
                   o<
                   £2 *"*"*
                   _c
                   O
                          r-^o
                          cn ro
                                                                                         o
                                                                                         o
                                                                                         o
                                                                                         tM
                                                                                         •
                                                                                                                              r-- LA
                                                                                                                              r^ OA
                                                                                                                                •   •
                                                                                                           ooooooo
                                                                                                           ooooo
                                                                                                                      r- oo
                                                                                                           OA     »—     LA

                                                                                                           •       O  U
 4-J  4->  O J3
 l/l   C      3
 O   0)  CM I/)
o   D  r-~-
    —  en  i
                                                                                                           CM     »-  '   .
                                                                                                           -    (0  O  C
 (0     OO •—
 5  I—  f~- 4-<
 0)<_)^-C
 •i-1  o      { X
\O ^D
r- r--
CM J-
C
o
•—
•M
o
3
-O
O
1-
O_

0>
cn
(0
i-
 .
<
U1
ro
T3
LA

l/>
>.
ro
Q

c
O
• —
4->
O
3
"O
o
1_
Q.
4-1 
U 4->
D O
o o -o
31- 0
4-> -O D- 1-
U O D-
31- cn
"O CL -^ cn
O -^
i- m o
CL _O O O
•— o o
cn •- o
-^ 0 .-
O ~v. ^
O O LA -v,
O - d o
>~ O r- O O
ro x— . - ^^ co o
Q -a «— — —i —i
^•* D.^, ro OT\ cn^^
—J cn _i cn -Y cn -^ en
V/* ^— ^ N/* *-^-^ d f^
•*- -^~ CI t
1 C C
o o
4-1 4-1
m ro
4-> 4-J

5
O
t—
U-

i_

ro
2
0)
4-1
t/)
ro
3
E
•—
_j

4-1
C
^j
3
r—
14_
(4—
LU

O
o
CO
E
•—
_J

4->
C
(U
3
t—
14_
^_
LU

Q
O
(_J
Ul
O
O

, —
(0
4-J
•—
Q.
ro
o

1 —
ro
4_J
o
1-





{/)
4-J
(/>
0
O

1 —
ro
3
C
C

L-
ro
(U
0
(§,
\°
o^
O
ro
c
3
V
in
3
D_
!_
0)
>
o
o
a>
Qi

. —
03
4-J
* —
ci-
ro
o




t/i
a)
X
ro
I-
-o
c
ro

dJ
o
c
ro
U
3
in
c





Maintenance

-J-

cn
C
• «
J_>
ro
j_
OJ
Q.
O




U
0)
3
O
Q-

JP

^>s.
en
j_
0)
c
LU




in
O
o
, —
ro
3
C
C


, —
ro
4-J
O





4J
4J O
0 3
3 -0
-o o
O 1-
i. a.
a.
in
cn _a
0 0
O
O

r —


•*>^ 	 "









4-1
(/)
0
0
_
ro
3
C
C
ro
r_ 	
ro
4-1
o
c
o
"S
ro
^
in
O
t •>
in
O
O
^j-
O
t—
O
DO
j_
D
O
Ul
O
O
ro
c
a)
E
6)
O
C







1
aver
g
3
tj>
,§
                                                                                                                                                 CM
                                                                                                                                                         CO
                                                                         107

-------
                      CM
                          .
                        DO
                      r
                   o   ^
                   c   m
             L.
             O
             cn
             CO
    in

    O
    _i  in
 in      O
4J  4-> <_)
 tn  c
 O  «> CM
CJ  Z3 P*^
 Q)  LU   -   2
 E     4-1    o
4J  <  m    <*-
 ro  LU  3
 (U  I-  cn
 i-  <  3
            -o
             c
             ro
   O
 in  <: cc
 ro  co -z.
3     LU
    o
    a.
    ca
             c
             CO
             a.
            -a
             O
             o
                        8
                        m
                              >- ro
                              ro -o
                             •a ~^.
                             "•x  m
                              cn J3
                             o o



                             K  X.


                             CO
                             o
                             o

                             T3
                             O
                             CO
                             cn
                             ro

                             co

in
>.
ro
-D
LA


>.
ro
Q

o
4-1
U
•o
o
1_
Q-
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
CM O I*"-
cn o j-
J- O •
o
o
•u
o
1_
a.
cn
o
0
>- o
_i cn —i
i

g
_.
u.

u

[ vo oo
o" cn LA
J- -t oo
vO
n
4-)
U
•D
O
1_
Q.
cn
O 0
•3 o
~o o
o
L. —
O- \
LA
m o
-Q O
— CO _J
o cn cn
0 -* E
o
*v. C
— o
ro —
cn 4J
— ' ro
4J
•_
E


4_)
C
3
14-
M-
UJ
Q
0
CO
CM r^s
0 0
\£> CM
cn —
CM
0 0
-d- vo
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
•t
LA
O
0
o
00 O
00 O
r^.oo CM
v^) r~~.

1
i
c
^
i — .r~^ CM
CM CM OO
CM
w
1 1 1
in
ro
o
0
4-1
ro
c
3
0)
L- s ro c
 T3 Z
o
0
CO
OL

t—
ro
4-1
a.
ro
o


c:
TO +
co cn
o c
c —
(D 4-1
i- ro
3 1-

o o
o o
— o
ro O
— LA
oo
-
1 I
1 1
4-1
1/1
L- O
0)
2 *-• •
o ro
O- 3
c
+ c
<
>
CO —
i- ro
0) 4J
c O
LlJ 1-


r-- LA
r~- oo
 w
-d~ LA
vo r^

o"
LA -f
t>f\ *v\
VU IAJ
 
1 1
4-> O
O 3
3 -a
•v o
O i-
i_ a.
in
cn -Q
0 O
O O
O O
_ f_^_
X^ Xs^
•- 
%*— *
7,
m
O
o



4-J
in
4-1 O
in O
8<
o
ro o
3 0-
C CO
c
ro >-
a>
ro O
4-1
0 4->
4-1 in
O
c o
o
^-~
*O CO
CO 4-J
m c
ro co
a)
4-1 U
I/) U
O C.
o —
•— CM

Q)
&>

§
>
fd

g
B
&
,_3
ro
                                                                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                                                                             m
                                                                108

-------
UJ

<
00
I   I  I
i   i  i
                                                              r-oo    o
                                                              "^ —    O
                                                               • —    o
O O O O O  •— P~-
o o o o o  — oo
o oo en on o   «  •
  .   •   n      . _J" i—
                                                                                vo
                                                                                      oo
                                                                                             Lf\
                                                                                              O

                                                                                              >
             S
o
                                     iiii
                        vQ *^   CD        O O CD O O
                        \o-3-    o        o o o o o co  o^
                          • t*\   CD        f^ -3" P"*- •"•" LT\   •   •

                                 I"--.        CM . rf
o'i~ ° 2 !
Table \l\\\ -5
Wastewater Treatment Costs
BPCTCA, BADCT and BATEA Effluent L
(ENR 1780 - August, 1972 Cos
Tall Oil Fractionat ion - Subcate
RWL BPi
1C-3 kg/day
103 Ibs/day)
3
.^
X X m"
r^ *> |Q
"O

-d- oo LA
O CN vD
^~ CN

*»— -'
d
o

4-1 (/)
O >-
i i i i
i i i i
0 0 OO 00
Lf\ O • LT»
on
] i \j
L> O
3 l-
1- U)
Q- -Q
•s/ C^
o
0 0
o ~
>. O t-
Q -a <— —
"**v. Q- *^s. tJ
-J CT) _ J Oi
v >— *• j^ •****

1

5
o
. V£>
— O
m
4-1
0
Q.
01
o
o
o
f.
o
0
CO —1
01 01
-X E

i
0

4-1

i











1A
to
o o o o o
on
X^N
LA
-4-
CM OJ CO — LTV
CM on
 v> 
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 I 1 1 1 1 1
flj
(U
o
0
(D
1_
CU 4-1 O













i_

l/)
^
Q.
>v
1_
fl)
>
o
0
 4-1
C. t/)
•— o
ro i— <->
y Q)
3 *-
+ 0 ro

.— j^ »—
o
3
-a
o
i_
a.
01
v/

CD
o
0
*.
%..
3
-o
o
J_
Q-
(fl
-Q
-—

CO
0
o
•I
•—

4->
(/)
4-> 0
t/> O
o
0 <
C_)
— 1-
(D CJ
3 Q-
C 00
C
ro »-
(U
»— >
 « —
0
Q- O
0) 4->
oi o
(D 3
1- T3
 V.
*C Q-


V,
8
CO
3
C
^
ro
4->
ro
0




4** ^
ro Oi • —
u i- ro
Q. c O
0 LU I—





4->
O
0




^— "






"O (D
(/I C
ro (D
-Q E
a)

irt O
O c
0 —
T— CM (











B
P
r>
                                                     109

-------
                CM
                 UJ

                 <
                 CD
                                            I   I
                                              CN
                                         I     H

                                              CN
       o
LA fl O
O  <- O

rv-"~ o
       LA
       •CO-
                                                                                                  O O  O O
                                                                                                  O O  O O
                                                                                                  CM O  rA i—
                                                                                                   •1   ft   Is

                                                                                                 OO T-  LA
                                                            O
                                                            O
                                                                                                                CM
                                                                                                                LA
                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                                 n
—CM
    I-
 X O
 cn Q
 O  <
—-  CD
 O
 C
-C
 o
 QJ
I-  <
    CJ
    h-
    o
    Q-
    00
                                            I   I   I
                                                                in
                                                                o
                                                                rH
                                                                        o
                                                                        CVl
       o
    o~\ o
    rsl o
      l/>
     O  —  4J  LU
    <4-  E  l/l
        —  O  >-
     in  _l CJ  1-
    4->         O
     in  4-1 CM  cn
     O  c r-  0)
vD  o  o) cn  4-*
 i      3 i—  ro
    4-1  —     O
—   CM-   - _Q
—   Q)  M-  4J  D
—   E  LU  l/l  CO

     ro  <;  cn  I
 0)   CD  LU  D
—   L.  I-  <  —
J3  L_  <
 ro      co  i  o
I-   L.
     (1)  "D  O  •—
    4J  C OO  fO
     ro  ro r^- •—
     3     —  4J
     CD  I—     C
    4J  O  C£  CO
     i/i  o  z  i/i
     ro  e^  LU  m
    5  CD -—' LU
o

o
0_
CO
                                           ,_ VD r—  LA
                                             •  cn   •  J"
                                           O    -
                 oo  o
                   • J-
                 O T-
                 r~-    -
cn o
  • o
                                                                        co   *
                                                                                            I   I   I
                                                                                            I   I   I
re
-a
in
CO
TTA
\ o
I/) T—
en
oo o
B__
. ,
o
-o
o

Q_


cn
ro
0)
<£
fff
T3
O
vD
CM

in

Q
£-
o

. t
u
3
-Q
O
L.
Q.
o
3
"o
Q_
01
O
O
> 0
ro ^~~ -
Q T) «—
_J cn_l
\f \^_^s \s

^
O
U_
L.
fll
. ,
_
2
CD
4-1
l/l
fD

0
4-J -0
O O
D !-
"O Q-
O
i. cn
0- -^
ul O
-Q O
— O
O t—
O ~-v
O Q
O
,— CO _l
•— cn cn
ro -^ E
c
O
4-1
ro
4->
'E

_j
c
CD
3
i —
u^_
14-
LU
Q
O
CO
u
O
D.
cn
O
o
o
O
c_> -1
cn cn
-^ E
c
o
4-J
ro i/i
4-1 4-J
— l/l
e

-1
4-J
c
0)
3
r^
1 J
M-
LU
Q
O
O
O
0

ro
•«-
a
ro
o
ro
4-J
O
!-



i/)
-M
I/I
O
0

fD
D
C
C
^
I/I
L-
ro
0)
o
o
ro
c
L.
3
4-J
CD
in
3
D-
CD
O
O

	 	 	
ro
4-J
•-»
D-
ro
LJ


in
CD
X
TO
X)
C
to
CD
O
c
ro
L.
3
l/>
C


Maintenance
er
2
+ 0
Q_
cn
C +
4-1 >^
ro cn
I- !_
C1J CD
CL C
O LU


l/l
O
O
1 —
ro
3
C.
£

r—
ro
4-1
O
1-


4-) O
O 3
-D O
O 1-
i_ 0-
Q_
in
cn JD
o O
o o
0 0
T-",-'1
^1^
— '
^~
4-J
l/l
o
C->


4-J
in
O
0
fD
3
C
C
ro
ro
4-J
O
4-1

C
o
TJ
CD
l/l
fD
-Q
%
O
O
«—
4-J
in
O
O
CJ
f-
CJ
Q.
CO
O
4-J &1
i/i ffj
O 7i
°1
r- CO
fD
"*"* P
c M

-------
                                                                                                                               r- OO
ii
II
                                                    „
                                                    °°
                                                            o o
                                                                                          CM
                                                                                          O
                                                                                          o
                                                                                          O
                                                                                                  r--
                                                                                                             O  O O O  O
                                                                                                             ooooo
                                                                                                             v£> J- O .—  «-
                                                                                                                                CM
                                                                                                             •—     «—     CM
                                                                                                                                                                        ,.•
                                                                                                                                                                        ro
                                                                                                                                                                        C?
                                                                                                                                                                        _>
                           CJ
    in
    C
    O

    4-1
    TO
    4J --^ U.
 \-  —  in
 O  £
14-  .—  l/l
    --I  O  O
 in     o  cn
 4-J  4-J      D
 in  C CM 4J
 o  Q) r~--  TO
o  3 cr\  o
    •— T- XI
 4-1  <4-      3
 C  <4-    - CO
 (I)  UJ  4-J
 E      in  I
 4-1  <£  3
 TO  LU  cn  m
 >- o
 cn Q
 O  <
—  CO
 o
 c
-C
 u

V-  <

    h-
    LJ
    O-
    co
                                                  I   I   I
                                                  I   I   I
                                    in

                                    § 2      ^  o
                                      . ro      °^
                                    OH      ^
                                                          I   I   I
                                        o
                                     3? 04

                                     * H
                                                                                       CM
                                                                                       CM LA
                                                                                                  O
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                  C
                                                                                                  CM
                                                                                                  -co-
O
o
o
  *>
LA
cr\
ry
XI
 TO
           CO
                1
 S-  -o      TO
 V   C  O  >
 4-i   TO CO —
 TO      r^v  i-
 5  f- i-  ».
>- ro
aj ~a
"O ^^
cn _o
^y r—

o ro
O O
r_ r__ t/)
>s.
XX TO
~Q
LA CO
LA
CO CM \O
CM vD ro
"* — '



4->
U
3
T3
o
O-

cn
V

O
o
^ o
TO x-v ^
Q "O T—
^\ Q. ^^
_j cn _J
\J ^^.^ \S



4-J
O
•u
o
L_
Q-

^
i —

O
O
O
«
*—
"^^
1 —
03
cn
• — •*



Q
D
-o
O

O-

cn
-^
o
o
o
*s
f^.
^^
o
o
CO _l
"^\
cn cn
-^ E

I
C
o
u
3
O
L
Q.

cn
-^
o
o
o
rt
t—
^^
Q
O
O

cn
y

I
C
O














_J
^^
cn
E




                                       C
                                       o
                                      T3
                                       O

                                      O-

                                       0)
                                       cn
                                       TO
                                                  TO
                                                  o
                                           c
                                           o
                                           u
                                           3
                                          -o
                                           o
                                                          o
                                                   ,- CO
                                                                                                                                    in
                                                                                                                                    00
                                                                                                      ro     T—      LA

                                                                                                      -co- -co-  -co- 
                                                                                                             ooo  o o  un CM
                                                                                                             o  o  o  o o     ~*-
                                                                                                             CO  CT)  CM  CTl CT
                                                                                                             S™™
                                                                                                                             -*/> v>
                                                                                                                  I   I
                                                                                                                                 1   1
                                                                                                              TO
                                                                                                              0)
                                                                                                              TO

                                                                                                              C
            in

            •—  1/1
            Q- D
                X
            >- TO
            i_ \~

            > -o
            o  c
            O  TO
            0)
            a:  a)
         in      O
        4-1  —  C
         I/)  TO  t)
         O  4J  1-
        0—3
            Q- l/l
        —  TO  C
         TO  O —

         C
         C
        <
                                                                                                                      TO
                                                                                                                         4-1   O
                                                                                                                          O   3

                                                                                                                         T3   O
                                                                                                                          O   >-
                                                                                                                          1-  D-
                                                                                                                         a_
                                                                                                                      4-1      l/l
                                                                                                                      in  cn jo
                                                                                                                      O -^  •—
                                                                                                                  !-  O
                                                                                                                  a)     o  o
                                                                                                                  3  — o  o
                                                                                                              +  o  TO o  o
                                                                                                                  Q-  3   -   -
                                                                                                              CD     C .-  i-
                                                                                                              c  +  c \  ^
                                                                                            03  cn—i—
                                                                                            i_  1_   TO  4-J
                                                                                            a)  a)  4-j  i/i
                                                                                            D-  C   O  O
                                                                                           O UJ  (—  O
                                                                              111

-------
in Section VII.  The incremental capital costs for achieving
the recommended NSPS effluent limitation is shown  in  Table
VIII-4  to  be  $135,000.  This cost would be in addition to
the capital investment made  to  achieve  the  BPT  effluent
limitations  and  guidelines.   In contrast, the incremental
cost for achieving the BAT COD effluent limitation would  be
$403,000.

A  discussion  of  the  possible  effects that variations in
treatment  technology  or  design  criteria  could  have  on
capital  and  annual  costs  is  presented  in  the  General
section.

    Energy

The size ranges of the BPT and BAT treatment models preclude
the application of  some  high-energy-using  unit  processes
such   as   sludge  incineration  and  carbon  regeneration.
Therefore, the overall  impact  on  energy  consumption  for
model  waste  treatment systems should be minimal; estimated
6.8 and 7.4% energy consumed by gum and wood chemical plants
54 and  59,  respectively.   Tables  VIII-3  through  VIII-7
present  the  cost  for energy and power, for each treatment
model for BPT, BAT, and NSPS.  The details  for  energy  and
power  reguirements  are  included  in  the  supporting cost
appendix document   (Supplement  A).   Telephone  discussions
with  managers  for  plants  No.  54 and 59 indicate that the
power to operate wastewater treatment facilities  for  these
plants  is  in  the  range of 7.9 to 10 percent of the total
power reguired for the manufacturing operations.

Liquid  waste  incineration  is   a  viatle  alternative  for
concentrated  waste  streams.   The  heating  value  of  the
particular waste dictates the auxiliary fuel reguirement and
thus these energy considerations  must  te  evaluated  on  an
individual basis.

    Non-water Quality Aspects

The major non-water quality aspects of the proposed effluent
limitations, guidelines and new source performance standards
are ultimate sludge disposal and  noise and air pollution.
The  BPT  treatment model process
the  digested biological  sludge.
this disposal  method  will  not
nuisance  conditions.   However,
diversity  of  opinion  over  the
crop toxicity and  in  the  food
nitrate   contamination  of  the
includes land spreading of
 If  practiced  correctly,
 create  health hazards or
there  is   a   widespread
effects of heavy metals on
chain,  and  the  possible
ground  water.   Carefully
                                 112

-------
controlled sludge application should minimize these problems
as well as the potential zinc problem.   The  following  are
summaries  of  the  biological  sludge  and exhausted carbon
residue from the proposed BPT and BAT treatment facilities:
Subcategory
   B
   C
   D
   E
   F
Biological
Sludge Quantity
(gallons/day)*

     430
   1,910
   1,820
     140
     760
Carbon
Residue
Combined
Sludge
                               (cu yd/year) z  (gals/day)
 249
  28
                1190
                 318
               1,780
1Based on a 2 percent solids concentration.
2Dry weight basis.

Noise levels will  not  be  appreciably  affected  with  the
implementation   of  the  proposed  treatment  models.   Air
pollution  should  only  be  a   consideration   if   liquid
incineration   were   selected   as   the   waste   disposal
alternative.
                                113

-------
                         SECTION IX

            BEST PRACTICABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
                 CURRENTLY AVAILABLE (BPT)
General
The effluent limitations that must be achieved by all plants
by  1  July,  1977  through  the  application  of  the  Best
Practicable Control Technology Currently Available (BPT)  are
based  upon  an average of the best performance achievements
of existing exemplary plants.  BPT effluent limitations  and
guidelines are based on level of technology of the exemplary
treatment  plants observed during the gum and wood chemicals
field survey and reported pilot plant studies.

The development of the BPT has been based on  both  in-plant
and  end-of-pipe technology for each industrial subcategory.
The effluent limitations and  guidelines  commensurate  with
the   BPT   have   been   established  for  each  industrial
subcategory on the basis  of  information  in  Sections  III
through  VIII  of  this  report,  and  are  presented in the
following  sections.   It  has   been   shown   that   these
limitations  can  be attained through the application of BPT
pollution control technology.  The approach taken in the gum
and wood chemicals segment is  described  in  the  following
section.
Gum and Wood Chemicals

    Strategy  for  Development  of  BPT Effluent Limitations
    Guidelines

The  effluent  limitations  and  guidelines  for  BPT   were
developed  by  steps,  starting  from  the process raw waste
loads  (RWL) .

As  previously  discussed  in  Section  IV,  Subcategory   A
 (production  of char and charcoal briguets via carbonization
of hardwood and  softwood)  is  a  net  water  consumer  and
discharges   no  process  wastewaters.   Raw  materials  and
intermediate char and charcoal briquets are handled in a dry
form.  The char is brittle and disintegrates with  handling,
thus  generating  excessive fines and creating fugitive dust
problems in  the  production  area.   This  problem  can  be
mitigated  by utilizing buggies for material transport.  Any
materials outside of the production specification range  can
be  reworked  or  disposed  of  in  dry form.  Therefore, no
                               115

-------
                                                                                        S    »
                                                                                        ro    ^
                                                                                                        iH    •»

                                                                                                        ^    °
                                                                                                        i-!    O
                                                                                10
                                                                                §
                                    in    to
                                    in    c^
                                    r-    o
                                                                                                              O

                                                                                                              O
O14-
                                      1 CM  O

                                      ' ^  O
                                    Q  O  V)
                                    o  o  trt
                                    OQ  O  I—
O O VI
o o to
CO O *—
O O V)
o o in
03 O K-
                                                                                                        o o
                                                                                                        o o
                                                                                                        eg CO
                                                                          go co
                                                                          O CO
                                                                       CQ  O I—
                                                     O  O



                                                     OT —
                                                      C O

                                                      ul CO
                                                      O C
                                        116

-------
discharge of process  wastewater  pollutants  is  consistent
with BPT for this subcategory.

For  the  other  five  subcategories,  the  process RWL is a
production-based  ratio  relating  specific  pollutants   to
production  quantities.   During the field sampling program,
process RWL's were developed for the five  subcategories  by
sampling  contact  process  wastewaters  wherever  possible.
Where it was not feasible to sample  a  segregated,  process
wastewater  stream   (e.g., Subcategory D), the total process
discharge was sampled but the RWL  flow  was  determined  by
subtracting  the  uncontaminated  cooling  water  and  steam
condensate contribution from the total process discharge.

There were also instances where the data  obtained  for  RWL
flow  was not considered representative of the process.  For
example, in Subcategory F, Plant No. 57  has  the  operating
practice   of   venting  an  aqueous  waste  stream  to  the
atmosphere in a vapor phase.  It was determined that  normal
manufacturing  practice  is  to  condense  such steam vapor;
therefore, this stream was included in the RWL flow for that
plant,  since  the  stream  contacted  small  quantities  of
entrained material and non-condensible hydrocarbons.

Single  RWL values were established in each category for all
pertinent pollutants; historic data on raw waste  loads  was
only available at Plant No. 55, Subcategory B, and Plant No.
55,  Subcategory  F.   All  other  data was derived from the
field sampling survey conducted by  the  contractor.   These
data  are  indicative  of  the  variations in raw waste load
which may exist for a single process at a  particular  plant
or   between  different  manufacturers  operating  the  same
process.  For example, this variation in RWL's was  observed
between  Plants  No.  55  and No. 52 in Sufccateqory B and is
discussed in Section V.

The single set  of  values  assigned  to  each  process  was
designed  as  the  RWL  which  can  be  obtained through the
application of in-plant pollution  control  practices  which
are   commensurate   with   BPT.    Briefly,   the   process
modifications considered consistent  with  BPT  include  the
following:

    1.   The recycle of still condensate  for  raw  material
         wash   water   as  illustrated  in  Plant  No.  55,
         Subcategory B.
    2.   The on-site treatment and recycle of  raw  material
         wash water as demonstrated in Subcategory c.
                                  117

-------
    3.    The  direct  recycle  of  immiscible solvents as an
         absorbent  of   non-condensible   hydrocarbons   as
         demonstrated in Plant No.  55,  Subcategory F.
    4.    The  recycle of water used in  barometric condensers
         as demonstrated in Subcategory D.

End-of-pipe treatment technologies  commensurate with BPT are
based on the utilization of biological  treatment,  including
activated  sludge  or  aerated lagoons  with clarification of
the lagoon effluent.  These end-of-pipe systems may  include
additional   treatment   operations  such  as  equalization,
neutralization, dissolved air flotation for subcategories  C
and  D  for  the  separation  of  insoluble hydrocarbons, or
nutrient addition.

Although biological systems are considered to  be  generally
applicable to the waste generated by this segment, it should
be noted that only two such systems were observed during the
study.    The  performance  data  for  these  two systems are
presented in Table VII-2.  The effluent from Plant  No.  59,
while  producing  a  high-guality  effluent,  was considered
atypical because the plant was operating at  low  levels  of
production  for  approximately  two weeks prior to the plant
survey.  Plant 56 employed dissolved air flotation  followed
by  an aerated lagoon.  This plant obtained 93% and 84% BOD5_
and COD reduction respectively.

The design criteria for the  proposed  biological  treatment
models   were   developed   from   bench   scale  biological
treatability studies on wastewaters from a wood naval stores
production operation and two tall oil by-product  production
facilities,  as  discussed in Section VIIB of this document.
It should be noted that metal catalyst may in some cases  be
used  in the production of rosin-based derivatives, and that
the process wastewaters may  contain  sufficient  levels  of
metal  to  be  toxic  or  inhibitory to a biological system.
However, if specific manufacturing processes employing  such
catalysts  discharges  wastewaters combined with wastewaters
from processes not employing metal catalysts, the  resulting
toxicity  of  the  total  wastewater  may be reduced to non-
inhibitory levels for biological treatment.  If this is  not
the  case,  BPT  does  not  preclude  the  use of in-process
pretreatment prior to discharge to biological facilities, or
physical/chemical processes to remove the toxic metals  from
the process wastewaters.

    Effluent Reduction Obtainable Through Application of BPT

Based on the information contained in Sections IV and VII of
this  document,  a determination has been made of the degree
                                118

-------
of effluent reduction obtainable via BPT, which is presented
in  Table  IX-1.   Although  the  effluent  limitations  and
guidelines  for  BPT may be obtained by whatever combination
of in-plant and end-of-pipe means  is  best  suited  to  the
individual   manufacturer,  the  numerical  values  for  the
effluent limitations and guidelines were calculated  through
application  of  waste reduction factors based on the use of
end-of-pipe  biological  treatment   systems.    The   waste
reduction  factors  used  for  calculating  the BPT effluent
limitations and guidelines for BOD are:
              BOD5 - 90 percent

These factors are based on  the  performance  of  biological
treatment  systems  described  in  Section VII - Control and
Treatment Technologies.

It is noted that BOD5 is listed as a  control  parameter  in
this  recommendation  for  limitations.   The  data  used to
evaluate the operation of the exemplary system  cited  as  a
basis for these recommendations is based in large measure on
the   reductions  of  COD  obtained  by  use  of  the  model
technology.  Since COD may be used by operators  to  control
treatment  plants  it is suggested that 13% be listed as the
long  term  reduction  efficiency  based   on   demonstrated
treatment systems.
                                119

-------
                         SECTION X

     BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICALLY ACHIEVABLE
General

The  effluent  limitations  and guidelines to be achieved by
all plants by July 1, 1983 through the  application  of  the
Best  Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT)  are
based upon the very best control  and  treatment  technology
employed by the existing exemplary plants in each industrial
subcategory.   In  those industrial subcategories where this
level  of  control  and  treatment  technology   was   found
inadequate  for  the  purpose  of  defining BAT, control and
treatment technologies transferable from other industries or
technology  demonstrated  in  pilot   plant   studies   were
employed.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

Treatment  commensurate with BAT requires the application of
activated carbon adsorption and filtration to the biological
treatment system described for BPT, or the  use  of  second-
stage  biological  treatment  in  series  with the BPT.  The
specific choice of waste treatment systems should depend  on
the specific process, or group of processes, in operation at
any given facility.

The  performance  of  these  systems  has  been discussed in
Section  VIII  -   Control   and   Treatment   Technologies.
Incremental    waste   reduction   associated   with   these
technologies for BOD5 and COD parameters are:

         COD  - 70 percent reduction   (BAT  effluent  is  30
              percent of achievable demonstrated performance
              treatment systems)

         BOD5  -  70  percent  reduction (BAT effluent is 30
              percent of a BPT effluent)

Effluent limitations and guidelines for BAT were  calculated
by  applying the above reduction factors to average effluent
for BPT shown in Table IX-1 for subcategories B  through  F.
BAT  effluent  limitations  and guidelines for subcategory A
are no discharge of process wastewater pollutants.

The  effluent  limitations  and  guidelines  for   BAT   are
presented  in  Table X-1.  Again, it must be understood that
the BODS and COD  values  as  presented  are  average  daily
                              121

-------
                             i
                        TO  nj
                       Q Q
                       00
                 O -T O~i
                 CM — O

                 d—"o
                                                                                                               ^ J-
                                                           O Q to
                                                           O O tO
                                                           CO O J—
                                                           O O 1/1
                                                           O O tO

                                                           CO O h-
                   LH
                 CD Q CO
                 O O I/)

X *-»


0) E
                              1
                                                           co    tr>
                                                           <"O OQ O
                                                           rH \^ O

                                                           o o o
                                                           O  Q  to
                                                           O  O  i/>
                                                           CO  O  h-
                                                                                             m
§
Q O to
O O CO
 t—
                                                            ^ eg  o

                                                            O e*J  O
                                                                             S~-c
                                                                               -
                            :  O o
                            I  I- O
                            •  o. o
                                  o  o
                                  O  LA

                                  ""•^
                                  oTr-v
                                  M>  —'
                                                                                                                                                  u
                                                                                                                                                  3
                                                                                                                                                 •§
                                              "O  (ft
                                              C  4->
                                              >0  
-------
                         SECTION XI

          NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS)
General
The  term  "new  source"  is  defined  in the "Federal Water
Pollution Control Act  Amendments  of  1972"  to  mean  "any
source,  the  construction  of  which is commenced after the
publication of proposed regulations prescribing  a  standard
of performance".  Technology applicable to new sources shall
be   the  Best  Available  Demonstrated  Control  Technology
(NSPS), defined by a determination of what higher levels  of
pollution  control  can  be  attained  through  the  use  of
improved  production  process  and/or  wastewater  treatment
techniques.   Thus,  in addition to considering the best in-
plant  and  end-of-pipe  control  technology,   new   source
performance  standards  (NSPS)  are  to  be  based  upon  an
analysis of how the level of  effluent  may  be  reduced  by
changing the production process itself.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

Best  Available  Demonstrated  Control  Technology (NSPS)  is
based upon the utilization of  both  in-plant  controls  and
end-of-pipe  process  treatment  technologies, which include
biological treatment as proposed  for  BPT  and  removal  of
additional  total  suspended solids via effluent filtration.
The reduction in BODS and COD parameters via the  filtration
of BPT effluent is as follows:

         BOD5 - 8 percent reduction of BPT effluent
         COD  - 13 percent reduction of BPT effluent

The  suspended  solids  limitation  should be 25 mg/1, which
will be applied to the effluent from  the  entire  treatment
facility.

NSPS  effluent  limitations and guidelines for subcategory A
are no discharge of process wastewater pollutants.

Table  XI-1  indicates   NSPS   effluent   limitations   and
guidelines  for  the  gum  and  wood chemicals manufacturing
point source category for Subcategories  B  through  F.   As
with  BPT and BAT, the values shown for the average NSPS ef-
fluent  should  not  be  directly  applied  until  they  are
adjusted,  as  presented  in  Table  XI-1,  for variation in
treatment plant performance as  provided  in  Section  XIII,
Performance Factors in Treatment Plant Operations.
                                125

-------
                   •— V)

                    (0 (D
                                                                    Q O  CO
                                                                    O O  CO
                                                                    OQ O  h-
                                                                O O  CO
                                                                CO O  I—
                                                                                                 O C
                                                                                                 O
                                 °(»->0
                                                     Q  O CO
                                                     O  O tO
                                                     CD  O |—
                                                                                               Q O to
                                                                                               O O CO
                                                                                               O3 O h-
<0 0)
l-o-
                                                                                    a*5!
                                                                                    Q Q tO
                                                                                    CJ O */*
                                                                                    CD O (—
                                                                               O O CO

                                                                               CQ O I—
   O
   co
0) 1
I- v
I  L
en

_i -
   t.
< o
o
o '01
a. to
                                 O Oo
                                 ^t O if)
                                 03 *^
                                    •#
                                                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                                                  3
                                                                                                                                  •§
                                                    3  r
                                                     Q O CO
                                                     O O CO
                                                     CO <-> (—
Ot    LO
Tf O 1^.
U3 -T ^~

O <*> O
                                                 882
                                                 CD CJ \—
                               o a
                               o o
                               CQ O
-Q


 O
                          o o
                          i-o
                          Q. o
                                                 O O



                                                 O^-^
                                          !r    -3
                                                                      126

-------
                        SECTION XII

                   PRETREATMENT STANDARDS
General

Pollutants  from  specific processes within the gum and wood
chemical manufacturing point source category  may  interfere
with,  pass  through,  or  otherwise  be  incompatible  with
publicly owned  treatment  works  (municipal  system).   The
following    sections   examine   the   general   wastewater
characteristics and the pretreatment unit  operations  which
may   be   applicable   to   the   gum  and  wood  chemicals
manufacturing point source category.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

A review of the wastewater characteristics reveals that  the
process  wastewaters  contain high concentrations of soluble
oxygen-demanding materials, and  are  generally  acidic  and
deficient   in   the  nutrients  phosphorous  and  nitrogen.
Significant concentrations of zinc  were  noted  during  the
survey  in  Subcategories  B  and  F.   The  zinc  metal  in
Subcategory F was attributed to losses of process  catalyst.
Contamination  of  gum distillation wastewaters with process
wastewaters from Subcategory  F  process  is  the  suspected
source of zinc in Subcategory B wastewaters.

Oil  and  grease  (from  vegetable  sources)  was  found  in
wastewaters from Subcategories B, D and F.  These  oils  are
not  hazardous  and  generally considered more biodegradable
than oils from petroleum sources.  However,  separable  oils
should  be  removed  from  the  process  wastewaters by pre-
treatment prior to discharge to public sewers  in  order  to
minimize  fouling  problems in the sewer.  This pretreatment
would be of a type  to  prevent  excessive  oil  and  grease
discharges  to POTW's.  A simple weir skimmer should suffice
and  essentially  no  cost  is   involved   since   existing
collection  systems can be fitted with skimmer weirs and the
oil removed periodically.   Proper  operation  and  employee
instruction should prevent any significant problems.

The  scope  of  this  study  did  not  allow  for a specific
toxicity  evaluation  of  individual  product   wastewaters.
However,  the  completeness  of  the RWL analytical data did
provide a wastewater profile which could be used to evaluate
possible biological inhibition.  Such evaluations must bring
into account the dilution  effect  of  domestic  wastewaters
when   considering  concentrations  of  possible  inhibiting
                                127

-------
                           TO
                           O
                           >- (ft
                          -c  x
                            O
                          -o —
                           C  E
                           0)  (D
                           O.JC.
                           (D O
                          T3
                           C
                                                    C
                                                    o
                         (D
                         4->
              +      +  —
                         Q.
              C  +  C  —
              O      O  O
             .-  C  —  CO
              •M  O  4J  l-
              (D  —  ro  Q-
              1-  4->  N
              TO  TO  •-  —
              Q. N  —  (D
              (U  —  (D  U
             CO  —  !_  .—
                 TO  4->  E
             —  3  3  (U
             —  IT CD  -C
             O  LLJ  2  <_>
                         +  C
                             O
                         C —
                         O  4J
                         —  TO
                         4->  N
                         TO —
                         N —
                         —  (D

                         (D  4J
                         3  3
                         or a)
                                                                                                                                                          VD
                                                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                                                          oo
        c
        O
        £
        0)
        Q.
        O
J3      C
 TO      CO
        (D
        (U


f—
JL_
3
O
i-
cu

"O
CO
X
•_
U-








E
CO
(/>
>.


p»
TO
U

CT
o
.—
o
•_
CO








+

c
o
•«
4->
TO
1_
TO
CL
CO
to

^-~
• _
o






+

c
0
•—
4->
TO
N
•—
•^
TO
3
CT
LU




+

C
0
•..
4J
TO
N
•«
r—
TO
1_
4-1
3



+
c
o

4->
U
co
4-*
o
1_
a.

t—
w-~
• _
c
o
•—
4-J
TO
•_
Q.

U
CO
!_
Q_

^->
TO
0

'i
co
CO Q- -C
"Z.
to
0






+

c
o
•«
4->
TO
N
•_
t—
TO
3
cr
LU






c
o
•^
-(->

                          T3  (D
                           (U  O
                          -O —
                           C  CT
                           Q)  O
                           Q.i—
                           Ul  O
                           3 •—
                          CO DQ
                                                        O
                -
            +  ro
               4->
        +  C .-
            O  CL
 C  +  C — —
        O 4J  O
    C —  O  Q)
    O  4-J   —  E
—  3  3 •—  0)
—  cr Q>  a. j^
O  UJ  2 to C_>
+


O

4-1

I-  4->


CO
    +  C
        O
 +  C  —
    O  4J
 c  —  o
 O  4J  0)
—  TO  4-»
 4->  N  O
                                                                 TO  4-> —
                                                                 33 —
                                                                 cr a)  a.
                                                                 LU  Z CO
                               U)
                               0)
                                                               C
                                                               a)
                                                               4->
                                                               c
                                                               O
                                                               o
                                                               i
                                                               o
 a.
 CD
-o

 o
                                                               TO
                                                               4J
                                                               Q.

                                                               O
                                                                                          TO
                                                                                          O
                                                                                         •^
                                                                                          E
                                                                                          0)
                               o
                               CT
                               0)
                               4->
                               TO
                               O
                               J3

                               to
              U.

               «v
              a


              m
                                                 TD
                                                  0)
                                                  (U
                                                           128

-------
materials.   Domestic  wastewaters   should   also   provide
sufficient   nitrogen   and   phosphorus   to   improve  the
treatability characteristics of the process wastes.  Because
this  manufacturer's  wastewaters  contain  high  levels  of
soluble  oxygen  demand in relatively small discharge flows,
it will be necessary that the sewage treatment facility have
sufficient oxygen transfer and solids handling and  disposal
capacity  to adequately treat wastewaters.  If such capacity
cannot be made available at the  public  system,  biological
pretreatment facilities must be provided by manufacturers to
reduce  the oxygen demand content of the process wastewaters
to acceptable levels before discharge to the public  sewers.
In  all  cases,  the manufacturers should provide sufficient
equalization and neutralization of  wastewaters  to  prevent
discharge  loadings  which could cause adverse impact on the
performance of the  municipal  system.   Table  XII-1  shows
possible   unit   operations   which  may  be  required  for
pretreatment of gum and wood chemicals wastewaters.
                                129

-------
                        SECTION XIII

             PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR TREATMENT
                      PLANT OPERATIONS
General

In the past,  effluent  requirements  have  been  issued  by
regulatory  agencies  without  stated  concern  for  uniform
expression.  Some agencies have issued  regulations  without
definition  of  time  interval or without stipulation of the
type of the sample (grab or  composite).   This  has  caused
difficulties  in  determining whether a particular plant was
in violation.  To overcome that situation, daily  historical
data  were reviewed, when available, from several biological
treatment plants.

Items  such   as   spills,   startup,   shutdown,   climatic
conditions, storm runoff, flow variation and treatment plant
inhibition  may  affect  the  operation  of  treatment plant
performances.

Some factors that bring about variations in treatment  plant
performance  can  be  minimized  through  proper  dosing and
operation.  Some of the controllable causes  of  variability
and techniques that can be used to minimize their effect are
explained below.

Spills  of  certain materials in the plant can cause a heavy
loading on the treatment system for a short period of  time.
A spill may not only cause higher effluent levels as it goes
through  the  system, but may inhibit a biological treatment
system and therefore have longer term effects.  Equalization
helps to lessen the effects of spills.  However,  long  term
reliable control can only be attained by an aggressive spill
prevention  and  maintenance  program  including training of
operating personnel.  Industrial associations  such  as  the
Manufacturing  Chemists  Association   (MCA)  have  developed
guidelines for prevention, control and reporting of  spills.
These  note  how to assess the potential of spill occurrence
and how to prevent spills.  Each industrial organic chemical
plant should be aware of the  MCA  report  and  institute  a
program  of  spill prevention using the principles described
in the report.  If every plant were to use  such  guidelines
as  part of plant waste management control programs, its raw
waste load and effluent variations would be decreased.
                                 131

-------
Startup and shutdown periods should be reduced to a  minimum
and  their  effect  dampened through the use of equalization
facilities and by proper scheduling of manufacturing cycles.

The design and choice of type of a treatment  system  should
be  based  on the climate at the plant location so that this
effect can be minimized.  Where there  are  severe  seasonal
climatic conditions, the treatment system should be designed
and  sufficient  operational flexibility should be available
so that the system can function effectively.

Chemicals likely to inhibit the treatment  processes  should
be identified and prudent measures taken to see that they do
not  enter  the wastewater in concentrations that may result
in treatment process inhibitions.  Such measures include the
diking  of  a  chemical  use  area  to  contain  spills  and
contaminated  wash  water, using dry instead of wet clean-up
of equipment, and changing to non-inhibiting chemicals.

The impact of process upsets and raw waste variations can be
reduced by properly sized equalization units.   Equalization
is  a  retention  of  the  wastes in a suitably designed and
operated holding system to average out the  influent  before
allowing it to enter the treatment system.

Storm  water  holding  or  diversion  facilities  should  be
designed on the basis of rainfall  history  and  area  being
drained.   The  collected storm runoff can be drawn off at a
constant rate to the treatment system.  The volume  of  this
contaminated   storm  runoff  should  be  minimized  through
segregation and  the  prevention  of  contamination.   Storm
runoff   from   outside   the   plant   area,   as  well  as
uncontaminated runoff, should be diverted around  the  plant
or contaminated area.

Gum and Wood Chemicals

    Biological Wastewater Treatment

Only two wastewater treatment plants which employ biological
treatment  were  surveyed  during the gum and wood chemicals
study.  Neither of these plants had sufficient historic data
to perform a statistical analysis to  determine  performance
factors for treatment plant operation.

Petroleum  refining  manufacturing  systems closely resemble
the gum and wood chemicals manufacturing plants in that both
employ   continuous   or   batch   continuous   distillation
operations  in  dedicated  equipment  on  hydrocarbon  based
materials.   Organic    load   variability   on   end-of-pipe
                                  132

-------
treatment  facilities  for these two segments are, therefore
anticipated to be closely related.

The performance factors for petroleum refining point  source
category have been published by EPA1 as follows:

                      Performance Factor   Performance Factor
Level of   Effluent   for Maximum Monthly  for Maximum Daily
Treatment  Parameter  Effluent Value	  Effluent Value

BPT         BOD5          1.7                     3.2
            COD           1.6                     3.1
            TSS           —*                     2.9

BAT         BOD.5          1.7                     2.1
            COD           1.6                     2.0
            TSS           —*                     2.0

NSPS        BODJ5          1.7                     2.1
            COD           1.6                     2.0
            TSS           --*                     2.0

*  Based  on  short  term  actual  performance  of exemplary
systems in gum and wood chemicals.

The proper performance factors  were  applied  to  long-term
average  daily BPT effluent limitations in order to generate
effluent limitations and guidelines  based  on  the  maximum
average  of daily values for thirty consecutive days and the
maximum for any one day as presented in Sections II, IX,  X,
and XI of this document.

The   applicability  of  this  established  treatment  plant
performance variability data for petroleum refining  to  the
gum  and  wood chemicals manufacturing point source category
will  be   further   substantiated   as   additional   plant
performance data become available.

    Activated Carbon Wastewater Treatment

During   the   survey   of   the   gum  and  wood  chemicals
manufacturing  point  source  category,  no  plant  employed
activated  carbon after biological treatment.  Consequently,
no  long-term  performance  data  were  available  for  this
process.  As a result, the performance factors developed for
BAT  and NSPS for petroleum refining were applied to BAT and
NSPS effluent  limitations  and  guidelines.   The  effluent
limitations and guidelines based on maximum average of daily
values  for  thirty consecutive days and maximum for any one
day in Tables X-1 and XI-1 were  similarly  calculated  from
                                133

-------
                        SECTION XIV

                      ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This  report  was  prepared  by the Environmental Protection
Agency on  the  basis  of  a  comprehensive  study  of  this
manufacturing  segment  performed  by  Roy  F. Weston, Inc.,
under contract  No.  68-01-2932.   The  original  study  was
conducted  and  prepared  for  the  Environmental Protection
Agency under the direction  of  Project  Director  James  H.
Dougherty,  P.E.,  and Technical Project Manager Jitendra R.
Ghia, P.E.  The following individual members of the staff of
Roy F. Weston, Inc.r made significant contributions  to  the
overall effort:

    C. Mangan                P.J. Marks
    J. McGovern              K. K. Wahl
    T.E. Taylor              W. D. Sitman
    K.M. Peil

The  original RFW  study and this EPA revision were conducted
under the supervision and guidance of Mr. Joseph S. Vitalis,
Project Officer, assisted  by  Mr.  George  Jett,  Assistant
Project Officer.

Overall  guidance  and excellent assistance was provided the
Project Officer by his associates in the Effluent Guidelines
Division, particularly Messrs. Allen Cywin, Director,  Ernst
P.  Hall, Deputy Director, Walter J. Hunt, Branch Chief, and
Dr. W. Lamar Miller.  Special acknowledgement is  also  made
of others in the Effluent Guidelines Division:  Messrs. John
Nardella,  Martin  Halper, David Becker, Bruno Maier and Dr.
Chester Rhines for  their  helpful  suggestions  and  timely
comments.  EGDB project personnel also wishes to acknowledge
the   assistance  of  the  personnel  at  the  Environmental
Protection Agency's regional centers,  who  helped  identify
those  plants achieving effective waste treatment, and whose
efforts provided much of  the  research  necessary  for  the
treatment  technology  review.  A special thanks is extended
to  Dr.  Raymond  Loehr  for  his  assistance  and  guidance
throughout the project.

Appreciation  is   extended  to  Mr. James Rodgers of the EPA
Office of General Counsel for his invaluable input.

In addition Effluent  Guidelines  Development  Branch  would
like  to  extend   its gratitude to the following individuals
for the significant  input  into  the  development  of  this
document  while  serving  as  members  of  the  EPA  working
                               135

-------
group/steerinq committee  which  provided  detailed  review,
advice, and assistance:

    W. Hunt, Chairman, Effluent Guidelines Division
    L. Miller, Effluent Guidelines Division
    J. Vitalis, Project Officer, Effluent Guidelines Div.
    G. Jett, Asst. Project officer. Effluent Guidelines Div.
    J. Ciancia, NERC, Edison, N.J.
    H. Skovrenek, NERC, Edison, N.J.
    M. Strier, Office of Enforcement
    D. Davis, Office of Planning and Evaluation
    P. Desrosiers, office of Research and Development
    R. Swank, SERL, Athens, Georgia
    E. Krabbe, Region II
    L. Reading, Region VII
    E. Struzeski, NEIC, Denver, Colorado

EGDB  would  also  like  to  acknowledge  the Pulp Chemicals
Association for providing valuable information on  tall  oil
manufacture, and the personnel of selected plants of the gum
and  wood  chemicals manufacturing point source category for
their help in the collection of data relating to process RWL
and treatment plant  performance.   Acknowledgment  is  also
extended  to  the  Charcoal  Briquet  Institute who supplied
valuable information for that segment of the study.

The cooperation of the individual  gum  and  wood  chemicals
companies   who  offered  their  facilties  for  survey  and
contributed  pertinent  data  is   gratefully   appreciated.
Alphabetically, the companies were:

    1.   Charlite-Briquets
    2.   Crosby Chemicals
    3.   George C. Brcwne & company
    H.   K.S. Varne & Company
    5.   Reichhold Chemical Corporation
    6.   Tenneco Chemical Company
    7.   Union Camp Corporation

Manufacturing  representatives  playing significant parts  in
the success of this study were:

    R.C. Crosby  (2)            W.O. Rails, Jr.  (7)
    I. Foster  (1)              S. Senzeneau  (6)
    B.C. Kendall  (3)           K.S. Varn, Sr.  (4)
    J.P. Krumbein  (5)

Acknowledgement and appreciation  is also given  to  Ms.  Kay
Starr and  Ms.   Nancy  Zrubek  for  invaluable   support   in
coordinating  the  preparation  and  reproduction  of    this
                                136

-------
report,   to  Mr.  Eric  Yunker,  Ms.  Alice  Thompson,  Ms.
Ernestine Christian, Ms. Laura Cammarota and Ms. Carol Swann
of the Effluent Guidelines Division  secretarial  staff  for
their  efforts  in the typing of drafts, necessary revision,
and final preparation of  the  revised  Effluent  Guidelines
Division development document.
                                  137

-------
                         SECTION XV

                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
Gum and wood Chemicals

1.       Biological and Chemical Treatability Studies of  an
         Emulsified    Chemical   Wastewater   for   Tenneco
         Chemicals,   Inc.,   Newport   Division,   Oakdale,
         Louisiana;   Associated  Water  and  Air  Resources
         Engineers,  Inc.,  Nashville,  Tennessee,   October
         1971.

2.       Biological Treatability of  the  Effluent  from  an
         Existing  Physical-Chemical Treatment System for an
         Emulsified  Chemical   wastewater   for   Reichhold
         Chemicals,   Inc,   Pensacola,   Florida  (Oakdale,
         Louisiana  plant);   Associated   Water   and   Air
         Resources  Engineers,  Inc.,  Nashville,  Tennesee,
         June 1974.

3.       Biological  T r e a ta b ili t y  of  Wastewater  from  the
         Production of Naval Stores for Reichhold Chemicals,
         Inc.,   Pensacola,   Florida   (Telogia,  Florida);
         Associated Water and Air Resources Engineers, Inc.,
         Nashville, Tennessee, June 1974.

4.       Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,  2nd  Edition,
         Kirk-Othmer, Interscience Publishers Division, John
         Wiley and Sons, Inc., Vol. 4, 1965.

5.       Gardner, Frank H., Jr. and A.R.  Williamson;  Naval
         Stores   Wastewater   Purification   and  Reuse  by
         Activated Carbon Treatment, Draft report; Grant No.
         S-80 1431, for EPA, Herbert  Skovronek,  Industrial
         Environment Research Laboratory, Edison, New Jersey
         08817, October 1975.

6.       Kent, J.A., ed.  Riegel's  Handbood  of  Industrial
         Chemistry,  Reinhold  Publishing  Corporation,  New
         York, 1962.

7.       Publicity Committee  (Zachary, I.G., et al.)    "Tall
         Oil and its Uses," Tall Oil Products Division, Pulp
         Chemicals  Association,  F.W.  Dodge  Company,  New
         York, 1965.
                                139

-------
8.        Revised Treatment Design for a Tall Oil  Waste  for
         Tenneco  Chemicals,  Inc.,  Newport  Division,  Bay
         Minette,  Alabama;   Associated   Water   and   Air
         Resources  Engineers,  Inc.,  Nashville, Tennessee,
         June 1973.

9.        Shreve, R.N., Chemical  Process  Industries,  Third
         Edition McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1967.

10.       Supplement A j& B - Detailed Record of Data Base for
         "Development Document for  Interim  Final  Effluent
         Limitations,     Guidelines    and    Standards   of
         Performance  for  the  Gum   and   Wood   Chemicals
         Manufacturing  Point  Source  Category",  U.S. EPA,
         Washington, D.C.  20460, April 1976.

11.       Treatment and Disposal of complex Industrial Wastes
         by C. Schimmel and D. Griffin, a draft  report  for
         Office    of   Research   and   Development,   U.S.
         Environmental Protection Agency,  Washington,  D.C.
         20460, June 1975.

12.       U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of  Manufactures,
         1972;   Industry   Series  1;   Industrial  Organic
         Chemicals, MC72(2) - 28F; U.S. Government  Printing
         Office, Washington, D.C.  1974.

13.       U.S. Bureau  of  Census,  Census  of  Manufactures,
         12-6-Zi Water Use in Manufacturing, MC67(1) - 7; U.S.
         Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.  1971.

14.       U.S. EPA; Draft Development Document  for  Effluent
         Limitations Guidelines and Standards of Performance
         - Miscellaneous Chemicals Industry, Prepared by Roy
         F.  Weston, Inc.   for Effluent Guidelines Division,
         Washington, D.C.   20460; February 1975.

15.       "Development  Document  for  Effluent   Limitations
         Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for
         Petroleum  Refining  Point  Source Category,  Issued
         April,  1974, EPA - 440174-014-A,  EPA,  Washington,
         D.C. 20460.

References

GR-1     AICHE  Environmental  Division;  "Industrial  Process
         Design for  Pollution Control," Volume 4; October,
         1971.
                                140

-------
GR-2     Allen, E.E.; "How to Combat Control  Valve  Noise,"
         Chemical  Engineering  Progress,  Vol.  71,  No. 8;
         August, 1975; pp. 43-55.

GR-3     American  Public   Health   Association;   Standard
         Methods  for  Examination of Water and Waste Water,
         13th Edition; APHA, Washington, D.C.  20036; 1971.

GR-4     Barnard, J.L.; "Treatment  Cost  Relationships  for
         Industrial  Waste  Treatment,"  Ph.D. Dissertation,
         Vanderbilt University; 1971.

GR-5     Bennett, H., editor; Concise Chemical and Technical
         Dictionary; F.A.I.C. Chemical  Publishing  Company,
         Inc., New York, New York; 1962.

GR-6     Blecker,  H.G.,  and  Cadman,  T.W.;  Capital   and
         Operating  Costs  of  Pollution  Control  Equipment
         Modules, Volume I. - User Guide; EPA-R5-73-023a; EPA
         Office of  Research  and  Development,  Washington,
         D.C.  20460; July 1973.

GR-7     Blecker,  H.G. ,  and  Nichols,  T.M.;  Capital  and
         Operating  Costs  of  Pollution  Control  Equipment
         Modules, Volume II - Data  Manual;  EPA-R5-73-023b;
         EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington,
         D.C.  20460; July, 1973.

GR-8     Bruce, R.D., and Werchan, R.E.; "Noise  Control  in
         the  Petroleum  and  Chemical  Industries," Chemical
         Engineering Progress, Vol. 71, No. 8; August, 1975;
         pp. 56-59.

GR-9     Chaffin, C.M.; "Wastewater Stabilization  Ponds  at
         Texas Eastman Company."

GR-10    Chemical  Coagulation/Mixed  Media  Filtration   of
         Aerated    Lagoon    Effluent,    EPA-660/2-75-025;
         Environmental   Protection     Technology    Series,
         National  Environmental  Research Center, Office Of
         Research  and  Development,  U.S.  EPA,  Corvallis,
         Oregon  97330.

GR-11    Chemical Engineering, August   6,  1973;  "Pollution
         Control at the Source."

GR-12    Chemical Engineering,  68   (2),  1961;  "Activated-
         Sludge Process Solvents Waste  Problem."
                                141

-------
GR-13    Chemical Week, May 9, 1973;  "Making  Hard-to-treat
         Chemical wastes Evaporate."

GR-14    Cheremisinoff, P.N., and Feller, S.M.;  "Wastewater
         Solids Separation," Pollution Engineering.

GR-15    Control of Hazardous Material  Spills,  Proceedings
         of  the  1972  National  Conference  on  Control of
         Hazardous Material Spills, Sponsored  by  the  U.S.
         Environmental  Protection  Agency at the University
         of Texas, March 1972.

GR-16    Cook, C.; "Variability in  BOD  Concentration  from
         Biological    Treatment   Plants,"   EPA   internal
         memorandum; March, 1974.

GR-17    Davis, K.E., and Funk, R.J.; "Deep Well Disposal of
         Industrial  Waste,"  Industrial   Waste;   January-
         February, 1975.

GR-18    Dean, J.A., editor; Lange* s Handbook of  Chemistry,
         11th  Edition;  McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York,
         New York; 1973.

GR-19    Eckenfelder, W.W., Jr.; Water  Quality  Engineering
         for  Practicing  Engineers; Barnes and Noble, Inc.,
         New York, New York;  1970.

GR-20    Eckenfelder, W.W., Jr.;   "Development  of  Operator
         Training Materials," Environmental Science Services
         Corp., Stamford, Conn.; August,  1968.

GR-21    Environmental Science and Technology, Vol.  8,  No.
         10, October,  1971; "Currents-Technology."

GR-22    Fassell, W.M.; Sludge  Disposal  at  a  Profit?,   a
         report  presented  at  the  National  Conference on
         Municipal     Sludge     Management,     Pittsburgh,
         Pennsylvania; June,  1974.

GR-23    Guidelines for Chemical Plants   in  the   Prevention
         Control  and  Reporting   of  Spills;  Manufacturing
         Chemists Association, Inc., Washington, D.C.  1972.

GR-24    Hauser, E.A.,  Colloidal   Phenomena,  1st Edition,
         McGraw-Hill  Eook Company,  New York,  New York; 1939.

GR-25    Iowa   State   University   Department  of   Industrial
         Engineering   and   Engineering   Research   Institute,
         "Estimating   Staff  and   Cost   Factors  for   Small
                                142

-------
         Wastewater Treatment Plants Less Than 1 MGD," Parts
         I  and  II;  EPA  Grant  No. 5P2-WP-195-0452; June,
         1973.

GR-26    Iowa  State  University  Department  of  Industrial
         Engineering  and  Engineering  Besearch  Institute,
         "Staffing Guidelines  for  Conventional  Wastewater
         Treatment  Plants  Less  Than 1 MGD," EPA Grant No.
         5P2-WP-195-0452; June, 1973.

GR-27    Judd,   S.H.;   "Noise   Abatement   in    Existing
         Refineries,"  Chemical  Engineering  Progress, Vol.
         71, No. 8; August, 1975; pp. 31-42.

GR-28    Kent, J.A., editor; Reigel's Industrial  Chemistry,
         7th  Edition;  Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New
         York; 1974.

GR-29    Kirk-Othmer; Encyclopedia of  Chemical  Technology,
         2nd Edition; Interscience Publishers Division, John
         Wiley and Sons, Inc.

GR-30    Kozlorowski,  B.,  and  Kucharski,  J.;  Industrial
         Waste Disposal; Pergamon Press, New York; 1972.

GR-31    Lindner,   G.   and   K.   Nyberg;    Environmental
         Engineering,  A Chemical Engineering Discipline; D.
         Reidel Publishing  Company,  Boston,  Massachusetts
         02116, 1973.

GR-32    Liptak,  B.G.,  editor;  Environmental   Engineers*
         Handbook,  Volume  I, Water Pollution; Chilton Book
         Company, Radnor, Pa.; 1974.

GR-33    Marshall, G.R. and E.J.  Middlebrook;  Intermittent
         Sand  Filtration  to  Upgrade  Existing  Wastewater
         Treatment Facilities,  PR  JEW  115-2;  Utah  Water
         Research  Laboratory,  College of Engineering, Utah
         State  University,  Logan,  Utah  84322;  February,
         1974.

GR-34    Martin, J.D., Dutcher, V.D.,  Frieze,  T.R.,  Tapp,
         M.,   and    Bavis,   E.M.;   "Waste   Stabilization
         Experiences  at  Union  Carbide,  Seadrift,   Texas
         Plant."

GR-35    McDermott,  G.N.;  Industrial  Spill  Control   and
         Pollution  Incident  Prevention, J. Water Pollution
         Control Federation, 43  (8)  1629 (1971).
                                143

-------
GR-36    Minear,  R.A.,  and  Patterson,  J.W.;    Wastewater
         Treatment   Technology,   2nd   Edition;   State  of
         Illinois  Institute  for   Environmental   Quality;
         January, 1973.

GR-37    National Environmental Research Center; "Evaluation
         of Hazardous Waste Emplacement in Mined  Openings;"
         NERC Contract No. 68-03-0470; September,  1974.

GR-38    Nemerow, N.L.; Liquid Waste of Industry - Theories,
         Practices and Treatment; Addision-Wesley Pulbishing
         Company, Reading, Massachusetts; 1971.

GR-39    Novak, S.M.; "Biological Waste Stabilization  Ponds
         at Exxon Company, U.S.A. Baytown Refinery and Exxon
         Chemical  Company, U.S.A. Chemical Plant (Divisions
         of Exxon Corporation) Baytown, Texas."

GR-40    Oswald, W.J., and Ramani, R.; "The Fate of Algae in
         Receiving  Waters,"  a  paper  submitted   to   the
         Conference  on  Ponds  as  a  Wastewater  Treatment
         Alternative, University  of  Texas,  Austin;  July,
         1975.

GR-41    Otakie, G.F.; A Guide to  the  Selection  of  Cost-
         effective  Wastewater Treatment Systems; EPA-430/9-
         75-002, Technical Report, U.S. EPA, Office of Water
         Program Operations, Washington, D.C.  20460.

GR-42    Parker, C.L.; Estimating  the  Cost  of  Wastewater
         Treatment  Ponds;  Pollution Engineering, November,
         1975.

GR-43    Parker,  W.P.;  Wastewater   Systems   Engineering,
         Prentice-Hall,  Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,
         1975.

GR-44    Parker, D.S.;  "Performance  of  Alternative  Algae
         Removal   Systems,"   a  report  submitted  to  the
         Conference   on  Ponds  as  a  Wastewater  Treatment
         Alternative,  University  of  Texas,  Austin; July,
         1975.

GR-45    Perry, J.H., et,  al.; Chemical Engineers* Handbook,
         5th  Edition; McGraw-Hill Book  Company,  New  York,
         New  York; 1973.

GR-46    Public Law  92-500, 92nd Congress,  S.2770;  October
         18,  1972.
                               144

-------
GR-47    Quirk, T.P.; "Application of computerized  Analysis
         to Comparative Costs of Sludge Dewatering by Vacuum
         Filtration   and   Centrifugation,"   Proc.,   23rd
         Industrial  Waste  Conference,  Purdue  University;
         1968; pp. 69-709.

GR-48    Riley,  B.T.,   Jr.;   The   Relationship   Between
         Temperature   and   the  Design  and  Operation  of
         Biological Waste Treatment Plants, submitted to the
         Effluent Guidelines Division, EPA; April, 1975.

GR-49    Rose, A., and  Rose,  E.;  The  Condensed  Chemical
         Dictionary,   6th   Edition;   Reinhold  Publishing
         Corporation, New York; 1961.

GR-50    Rudolfs, W.; Industrial Wastes, Their Disposal  and
         Treatment;  Reinhold  Publishing  Corporation,  New
         York; 1953.

GR-51    Sax,  N.I.;  Dangerous  Properties  of   Industrial
         Material,   4th   Edition;  Van  Nostrand  Reinhold
         Company, New York;  1975.

GR-52    Seabrook, B.L.; Cost  of  Wastewater  Treatment  by
         Land   Application;   EPA-430/9-75-003,   Technical
         Report;  U.S.  EPA,   Office   of   Water   Program
         Operations, Washington, D.C.  20460.

GR-53    Shreve, R.N.; Chemical  Process  Industries,  Third
         Edition; McGraw-Hill, New York; 1967.

GR-54    Spill Prevention Technigues for Hazardous Polluting
         Substances,   OHM   7102001;   U.S.   Environmental
         Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460; February
         1971.

GR-55    Stecher,  P.G.,  editor;  The   Merck   Index,   An
         Encyclopedia  of  Chemicals and Drugs, 8th Edition;
         Merck and Company,  Inc., Rahway, New Jersey; 1968.

GR-56    Stevens, J.I., "The Roles of Spillage, Leakage  and
         Venting in Industrial Pollution Control", Presented
         at  Second  Annual  Environmental  Engineering  and
         Science Conference, University of Louisville, April
         1972.

GR-57    Supplement A j> JB -  Detailed Record of Data Base for
         "Draft  Development  Document  for  Interim   Final
         Effluent  Limitations,  Guidelines and Standards of
         Performance   for   the   Miscellaneous   Chemicals
                                 145

-------
         Manufacturing  Point  Source  Category",  U.S. EPA,
         Washington, D.C.  20460, February 1975.

GR-58    Swanson,  C.L.;   "Unit   Process   Operating   and
         Maintenance  Costs for Conventional Waste Treatment
         Plants;" FWQA, Cincinnati, Ohio; June, 1968.

GR-59    U.S. Department of Health, Education, and  Welfare;
         "Interaction  of Heavy Metals and Biological Sewage
         Treatment Processes," Envir onmental Health  Series;
         HEW  Office  of Water Supply and Pollution Control,
         Washington, D.C.; May, 1965.

GR-60    U.S. Department of the  Interior;  "Cost  of  Clean
         Water,"  Industrial  Waste  Profile No. 3; Dept. of
         Int. GWQA, Washington, D.C.; November, 1967.

GR-61    U.S.  EPA;  Process  Design  Manual  for  Upgrading
         Existing  Waste  Water  Treatment  Plants, U.S. EPA
         Technology Transfer; EPA, Washington, D.C.   20460;
         October, 1974.

GR-62    U.S. EPA; Monitoring Industrial Waste  Water,  U.S.
         EPA  Technology  Transfer;  EPA,  Washington,  D.C.
         20460; August,  1973.

GR-63    U.S. EPA; Methods for Chemical  Analysis  of  Water
         and  Wastes,  U.S.  EPA  Technology  Transfer;  EPA
         625/6-74-003; Washington, D.C.  20460; 1974.

GR-64    U.S. EPA; Handbook for Analytical  Quality  Control
         in  Water  and  Waste  Water Laboratories^ U.S. EPA
         Technology Transfer; EPA, Washington, D.C.   20460;
         June,  1972.

GR-65    U.S. EPA;  Process  Design  Manual   for  Phosphorus
         Removal,   U.S.   EPA   Technology  Transfer;  EPA,
         Washington, D.C.  20460; October, 1971.

GR-66    U.S.   EPA;  Process  Design  Manual  for  Suspended
         Solids  Removal,  U.S. EPA Technology Transfer; EPA
         625/1-75-003a,  Washington,  D.C.   20460;  January,
         1975.

GR-67    U.S. EPA;  Process Design Manual for  Sulfide Control
         in Sanitary Sewerage Systems, U.S.   EPA  Technology
         Transfer;  EPA,  Washington,  D.C.   20460; October,
         1974.
                                  146

-------
GR-68    U.S.  EPA;  Process  Design   Manual   for   Carbon
         Adsorption,  U.S.  EPA  Technology  Transfer;  EPA,
         Washington, B.C.  20460; October, 1973.

GR-69    U.S.  EPA;  Process  Design   Manual   for   Sludge
         Treatment   and   Disposal,   U.S.  EPA  Technology
         Transfer;  EPA   625/1-74-006,   Washington,   D.C.
         20460; October, 1974.

GR-70    U.S.  EPA;  Effluent  Limitations  Guidelines   and
         Standards of Performance, Metal Finishing Industry,
         Draft  Development  Document;  EPA 440/1-75/040 and
         EPA 440/1-75/040a; EPA  Office  of  Air  and  Water
         Programs, Effluent Guidelines Division, Washington,
         D.C.  20460; April, 1975.

GR-71    U.S.  EPA;  Development   Document   for   Effluent
         Limitations Guidelines and Standards of Performance
         -  Organic  Chemicals  Industry; EPA 440/1-74/009a;
         EPA Office of  Air  and  water  Programs,  Effluent
         Guidelines   Division,   Washington,  D.C.   20460;
         April, 1974.

GR-72    U.S. EPA; Draft Development Document  for  Effluent
         Limitations Guidelines and Standards of Performance
             Steam   Supply  and  NQncontact  Cooling  Water
         Industries; EPA Office of Air and  Water  Programs,
         Effluent   Guidelines  Division,  Washington,  D.C.
         20460; October, 1974.

GR-73    U.S. EPA; Draft Development Document  for  Effluent
         Limitations Guidelines and Standards of Performance
         -  Organic Chemicals industry. Phase II Prepared by
         Roy F. Weston, Inc. under EPA Contract  No.  68-01-
         1509;   EPA  Office  of  Air  and  Water  Programs,
         Effluent  Guidelines  Division,  Washington,   D.C.
         20460; February, 1974.

GR-74    U.S. EPA; Evaluation of Land  Application  Systems,
         Technical    Bulletin;   EPA   430/9-75-001;   EPA,
         Washington, E.G.  20460; March, 1975.

GR-75    U.S. EPA; "Projects  in  the  Industrial  Pollution
         Control    Division,"    Environmental   Protection
         Technology   Series;   EPA    600/2-75-001;    EPA,
         Washington, D.C.  20460; December, 1974.

GR-76    U.S. EPA;  Wastewater  Sampling  Methodologies  and
         glow  Measurement Technigues; EPA 907/9-74-005; EPA
                                147

-------
         Surveillance and Analysis,  Region  VII,  Technical
         Support Branch; June, 1974.

GR-77    U.S. EPA; A Primer on Waste  Water  Treatment;  EPA
         Water Quality Office; 1971.

GR-78    U.S. EPA; Compilation of Municipal  and  Industrial
         Injection Wells in the United States; EPA 520/9-74-
         020;  Vol.  I and II; EPA, Washington, D.C.  20460;
         1974.

GR-79    U.S. EPA; "Upgrading Lagoons," U.S. EPA  Technology
         Transfer;  EPA,  Washington,  D.C.   20460; August,
         1973.

GR-80    U.S.  EPA;   "Nitrification   and   Denitrification
         Facilities,"  U.S. EPA Technology Transfer; August,
         1973.

GR-81    U.S.  EPA;  "Physical-Chemical  Nitrogen  Removal,"
         U.S. EPA Technology Transfer; EPA, Washington, D.C.
         20460; July, 1974.

GR-82    U.S. EPA; "Physical-Chemical  Wastewater  Treatment
         Plant  Design,"  U.S. EPA Technology Transfer; EPA,
         Washington, D.C.  20460; August, 1973.

GR-83    U.S.  EPA;  "Oxygen  Activated  Sludge   Wastewater
         Treatment  Systems,  Design  Criteria and Operating
         Experience," U.S.  EPA  Technology  Transfer;  EPA,
         Washington, B.C.  20460; August, 1973.

GR-84    U.S.     EPA;    Wastewater    Filtration     Design
         Considerations;  U.S. EPA Technology Transfer; EPA,
         Washington, D.C.  20460; July,  1974.

GR-85    U.S. EPA; "Flow Equalization,"  U.S. EPA  Technology
         Transfer; EPA, Washington, D.C. 20460; May, 1974.

GR-86    U.S. EPA; "Procedural  Manual   for  Evaluating  the
         Performance  of  Wastewater Treatment Plants," U.S.
         EPA Technology  Transfer;  EPA,  Washington,  D.C.
         20460.

GR-87    U.S. EPA; Supplement to  Development  Document  for
         Effluent Limitations,  Guidelines  and  New  Source
         Performance  Standards   for    the   Corn   Milling
         Subcategory,   Grain  Processing,  EPA, Office  of Air
         and Water Programs,  Effluent  Guidelines   Division,
         Washington, D.C.  20460, August 1975.
                                 148

-------
GR-88    U.S. EPA;  Pretreatment  of  Pollutants  Introduced
         Into  Publicly Owned Treatment Works; EPA Office of
         Water Program Operations, Washington, D.C.   20460;
         October, 1973.

GR-89    U.S.   Government   Printing    Office;    Standard
         Industrial    Classification   Manual;   Government
         Printing Office, Washington, D.C.  20492; 1972.

GR-90    U.S. EPA; Tertiary Treatment of  Combined  Domestic
         and    Industrial   Wastes,   EPA-R2-73-236,   EPA,
         Washington, D.C. 20460; May, 1973.

GR-91    Wang,  Lawrence   K.;   Environmental   Engineering
         Glossary (Draft) Calspan Corporation, Environmental
         Systems Division, Buffalo, New York 14221, 1974.

GR-92    Water Quality Criteria 1972, EPA-R-73-033, National
         Academy  of  Sciences  and  National   Academy   of
         Engineering;  U.S.  Government Printing Office, No.
         5501-00520, March, 1973.

GR-93    Weast, R.r editor; CRC Handbook  of  Chemistry  and
         Physics,  54th  Edition; CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio
         44128; 1973-1974.

GR-94    Weber,   C.I.,   editor;   Biological   Field   and
         Laboratory  Methods  for  Measuring  the Quality of
         Surface  Waters   and   Effluents,"   Environmental
         Monitoring    Series;    EPA   670/4-73-001;   EPA,
         Cincinnati, Ohio  45268; July, 1973.

GR-95    APHA, ASCE, AWWA, and WPCF, Glossary of  Water  and
         Wastewater Control Engineering, American Society of
         Civil Engineers, New York, 1969.
                                149

-------
                        SECTION XVI

                          GLOSSARY
Gum and wood Chemicals

Carbonization.   A  process  whereby  a  carbon  residue  is
produced via the destructive distillation of wood.

Destructive  Distillation.   Decomposition  of  wood  (or  a
hydrocarbon)   by   heat  in  a  closed  container  and  the
collection of the volatile substances produced.

Essential   Oils.    Oils   composed   mainly   of   terpene
hydrocarbons  (turpentine),  which  are  obtained  by  steam
distillation of wood chips, bark, or leaves of select trees.

Ester Gum.  A resin made  from rosin or  rosin  acids  and  a
polyhydric alcohol, such  as glycerin or pentaerythritol.

Exudate.  Exuded matter.

Exude.  To ooze or trickle forth through pores or gushes, as
sweat or gum, etc.

Fines.   crushed  solids  sufficiently fine to pass through a
screen, etc.

Gum.  The crystallized pine oleoresin or "scrape"  collected
from scarified "faces" of trees being worked for turpentine,
exudates from living long leaf and slash pine trees.

Hardwood _(gr Deciduous woods)«  Trees that lose their leaves
annually.   Morphologically and chemically distinct from the
conifers and commonly referred to as hardwoods, despite  the
fact  that  certain species such as basswood and poplar have
woods that are relatively soft.   Fibers  are  substantially
shorter  that those of coniferous wood.  Normally, deciduous
woods are not a source of turpentine.

Kraft  (or Sulfate) Process.  The  digestion  of  wood  chips
with  a  solution  of  sodium hydroxide, sodium sulfide, and
sodium  carbonate  to  product  paper  pulp.   This  process
delignifies  the  wood  chip  and  allows  separation of the
cellulose  fibers  from   a  caustic   solution   of   lignin
degradation  products   (sugars,  hemicellulose,  resin,  and
fatty acids) and unsaponifiables.
                                151

-------
Naval Store s.  Chemically reactive oils, resins,  tars,  and
pitches  derived from the oleoresin contained in, exuded by,
or extracted from trees chiefly of the pine  species   (Genus
Pinus), or from the wood of such trees.

Non-conden sibles.   Vapors  or  gases  that  remain  in  the
gaseous state at the  temperature  and  pressure  specified.
These  normally  would  be considered the final vented gases
under operating conditions.

Oleoresin.  Pine gum, the  non-aqueous  secretion  of  rosin
acids  dissolved  in  a  terpene  hydrocarbon  oil  which is
produced or exuded from the intercellular resin ducts  of  a
living   tree   or   accumulated,  together  with  oxidation
products, in the dead wood of weathered limbs and stumps.

Pine Tar Oil.  The oil obtained  by  condensing  the  vapors
from   the   retorts   in   which   resinous  pine  wood  is
destructively distilled  (carbonized).

Pitch.  A dark viscous substance obtained as residue in  the
distillation  of  the  volatile oils from retort pine oil or
crude tall oil.

Pitch, Brewer's.  A term used to designate a type  of  pitch
made  by  blending certain oils, waxes, or other ingredients
with rosin for the coating of beer barrels.

Pvroligeneous  Acid.    A   product   of   the   destructive
distillation of hardwoods composed primarily of acetic acid,
crude methanol, acetone, tars and oils, and water.

Resin.   A  large  class  of  synthetic  products  that have
properties similar to  natural  resin,  or  rosin,  but  are
chemically different.

Retort.   A  vessel  in  which  substances  are distilled or
decomposed by heat.

Rosin.  A specific kind  of  natural  resin  obtained  as   a
nitreous  water-insoluble  material  from  pine oleoresin by
removal of the volatile  oils,  or  from  tall  oil  by  the
removal  of  the fatty acid components  thereof.  It consists
primarily  of  tricyclic  monocarboxylic  acids  having  the
general  empirical formula C20  H30 O2,  with small quantities
of compounds saponifiable with  boiling  alcoholic  potassium
or  sodium  hydroxide,   and  some unsaponifiable.  The three
general classifications  of kinds of rosin in  commerce are:
gum rosin, obtained  from the oleoresin  collected from  living
trees;  wood  rosin,  from  the oleoresin contained in dead
                                 152

-------
wood, such as stumps and knots; and  tall  oil  rosin,  from
tall oil.

Rosin  Modified.   Rosin  that has been treated with heat or
catalysts,  or  both;  with  or   without   added   chemical
substances,  so  as  to  cause  substantial  change  in  the
structure   of   the   rosin   acids,   as    isomerization,
hydrogenation,  dehydrogenation,  or polymerization; without
substantial effect on the carboxyl group.

Saponification.  The reaction in which caustic combines with
fat or oil to produce soap.

Seal Leg.  The line through which an underflow liguid flows,
constructed to maintain a liquid trap that  will  not  empty
upon nominal pressure changes in the vessel.

Separator.   The  vessel  connected  to  the  vent-relief to
separate wood fines carried over in the  vent-relief  gases,
and which permits the steam and turpentine vapors  (including
non-condensables) to proceed in vapor form to the condenser.

Sparge.   To  heat  a liquid by means of live steam entering
through a perforated or nozzled pipe.

Tall Oil.  A generic name for a number of products  obtained
from  the  manufacture  of wood pulp by the alkali  (sulfate)
process, more popularly known  as  the  Kraft  process.   To
provide  some  distinction  between  the  various  products,
designations  are  often  applied  in  accordance  with  the
process  or  composition,  some of which are crude tall oil,
acid-refined tall oil, distilled tall oil,  tall  oil  fatty
acids, and tall oil rosin.

Tall  QilT  Crude.   A  dark  brown  mixture of fatty acids,
rosin, and neutral materials liberated by the  acidification
of  soap  skimmings.  The fatty acids are a mixture of oleic
acid and linoleic acid with lesser amounts of saturated  and
other  unsaturated  fatty  acids.   The rosin is composed of
resin acids similar to those found in gum  and  wood  rosin.
The  neutral  materials  are  composed  mostly of polycyclic
hydrocarbons,  sterols,  and   other   high-molecular-weight
alcohols.

Terpenes.   The  major chemical components of turpentine.  A
class of unsaturated organic compounds having the  empirical
formula  C10  H16,  occurring  in  most  essential  oils and
oleoresinous plants.  Structurally, the  important  terpenes
and   their   derivatives   are   classified  as  monocyclic
 (dipentene), bicyclic (pinene), and acyclic  (myrcene).
                                 153

-------
Turpentine.  A light-colored, volatile  essential  oil  from
resinuous  exudates  or resinous wood associated with living
or dead coniferous kinds of turpentine as follows:  (1)   gum
turpentine,  obtained  by  distilling the gum collected from
living pine trees; (2) steam-distilled wood turpentine, from
the oleoresin within the wood of pine  stumps  or  cuttings,
either by direct steaming of mechanically disintegrated wood
or  after solvent extraction of the oleoresin from the wood;
(3) sulfate wood turpentine, recovered during the conversion
of wood pulp by the Kraft  (sulfate) process.  (Sulfate  wood
turpentine   is   somewhat  similar  to  gum  turpentine  in
composition);    and    (U)   destructively   distilled   wood
turpentine,   obtained  by  fractionation  of  certain  oils
recovered from the destructive distillation of pine wood.

General Definitions

Abatement.   The  measures  taken  to  reduce  or  eliminate
pollution.

Absorption.  A process in which one material  (the absorbent)
takes  up  and  retains  another   (the  absorbate)  with the
formation of a homogeneous mixture having the attributes  of
a  solution.   Chemical  reaction  may  accompany  or follow
absorption.

Acclimation.  The ability of an organism to adapt to changes
in its immediate environment.

Acid.   A  substance  which  dissolves  in  water  with  the
formation of hydrogen ions.

Acid  Solution.   A  solution with a pH of less than 7.00 in
which the activity of the hydrogen ion is greater  than  the
activity of the hydroxyl ion.

Acidity.   The  capacity  of a wastewater for neutralizing  a
base.  It is normally associated with the presence of carbon
dioxide, mineral and organic acids and salts of strong acids
or weak bases.   It  is  reported  as  equivalent  of  CaC03_
because  many  times  it  is  not  known just what acids are
present.

Acidulate.  To make somewhat acidic.

Act*  The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments  of
1972, Public Law 92-500.
                                    154

-------
Activated   Carbon.     Carbon  which  is  treated  by  high-
temperature heating with steam or carbon  dioxide  producing
an internal porous particle structure.

Activated  Sludge  Process.   A  process  which  removes the
organic matter from sewage by saturating  it  with  air  and
biologically   active   sludge.    The  recycle  "activated"
microoganisms are  able  to  remove  both  the  soluble  and
colloidal organic material from the wastewater.

Adsorption.   An advanced method of treating wastes in which
a material removes organic matter not necessarily responsive
to clarification or biological treatment by adherence on the
surface of solid bodies.

Adsorption  Isotherm.   A  plot  used  in   evaluating   the
effectiveness  of  activated carbon treatment by showing the
amount of impurity adsorbed  versus  the  amount  remaining.
They are determined at a constant temperature by varying the
amount  of  carbon used or the concentration of the impurity
in contact with the carbon.

Advance Waste Treatment.  Any treatment  method  or  process
employed  following  biological  treatment  to  increase the
removal of pollution load, to remove substances that may  be
deleterious  to  receiving  waters  or the environment or to
produce a high-guality effluent suitable for  reuse  in  any
specific  manner or for discharge under critical conditions.
The term tertiary  treatment  is  commonly  used  to  denote
advanced waste treatment methods.

Aeration.   (1)  The  bringing  about  of  intimate  contact
between air and a liquid by one of  the  following  methods:
spraying  the  liguid  in  the air, bubbling air through the
liquid, or  agitation  of  the  liquid  to  promote  surface
absorption  of  air.    (2)  The  process  or  state of being
supplied or impregnated with  air;  in  waste  treatment,  a
process  in which liguid from the primary clarifier is mixed
with compressed air and with biologically active sludge.

Aeration  Period.    (1)  The   theoretical   time,   usually
expressed  in  hours,  that the mixed liquor is subjected to
aeration in an  aeration  tank  undergoing  activated-sludge
treatment.  It is equal to the volume of the tank divided by
the  volumetric  rate  of  flow of wastes and return sludge,
(2) The theoretical  time  that  liquids  are  subjected  to
aeration.

Aeration Tank.  A vessel for injecting air into the water.
                                 155

-------
Aerobic.   Ability  to  live, grow, or take place only where
free oxygen is present.

Aerobic  Biological  Oxidation.   Any  waste  treatment   or
process  utilizing aerobic organisms, in the presence of air
or oxygen, as agents for  reducing  the  pollution  load  or
oxygen demand of organic substances in waste.

Aerobic Digestion.  A process in which microorganisms obtain
energy  by  endogenous  or  auto-oxidation of their cellular
protoplasm.  The  biologically  degradable  constituents  of
cellular  material  are  slowly  oxidized to carbon dioxide,
water and ammonia, with the ammonia being further  converted
into nitrates during the process.

Algae.   One-celled  or  many-celled  plants  which  grow in
sunlit waters and which are capable of photosynthesis.  They
are a food for fish and small aquatic animals and, like  all
plants, put oxygen in the water.

Algae  Bloom.   Large  masses of microscopic and macroscopic
plant life, such as  green  algae,  occuring  in  bodies  of
wat er.

Algicide.  Chemical agent used to destroy or control algae.

Alkali.   A  water-soluble  metallic  hydroxide that ionizes
strongly.

Alkalinity.  The presence of salts of  alkali  metals.   The
•hydroxides,  carbonates  and bicarbonates of calcium, sodium
and magnesium are common impurities that  cause  alkalinity.
A  quantitative  measure  of  the  capacity  of  liquids  or
suspensions to neutralize strong  acids  or  to  resist  the
establishment of acidic conditions.  Alkalinity results from
the   presence   of  bicarbonates,  carbonates,  hydroxides,
alkaline  salts  and  occasionally  borates  and  is  usually
expressed  in  terms of the amount of calcium carbonate that
would have  an  equivalent  capacity  to  neutralize  strong
acids.

Alum.   A  hydrated  aluminum   sulfate or potassium aluminum
sulfate or ammonium aluminum sulfate  which  is  used   as   a
settling  agent.  A coagulant.

Ammonia  Nitrogen.   A gas  released by the microbiological
decay of  plant  and animal proteins.  When  ammonia  nitrogen
is    found    in  waters,  it   is   indicative  of  incomplete
treatment.
                                  156

-------
Ammonia Stripping,  A modification of the  aeration  process
for  removing  gases  in water.  Ammonium ions in wastewater
exist in equilibrium with ammonia and hydrogen ions.   As  pH
increases, the equilibrium shifts to the right, and above pH
9  ammonia  may  be  liberated  as  a  gas  by agitating the
wastewater in the presence of air.  This is usually done  in
a packed tower with an air blower.

Ammonification.   The process in which ammonium is liberated
from organic compounds by microoganisms.

Anaerobic.  Ability to live, grow, or take place where there
is no air or free oxygen present.

Anaerobic Biological Treatment.   Any  treatment  method  or
process utilizing anaerobic or facultative organisms, in the
absence  of  air,  for  the  purpose of reducing the organic
matter in wastes or organic solids settled out from wastes.

Anaerobic Digestion.  Biodegradable materials in primary and
excess activated sludge are stabilized by being oxidized  to
carbon  dioxide,  methane  and  other  inert  products.  The
primary digester serves mainly  to  reduce  VSS,  while  the
secondary  digester  is mainly for solids-liquid separation,
sludge thickening and storage.

Anion,  Ion with a negative charge.

Antagonistic Effects.  The simultaneous action  of  separate
agents mutually opposing each other.

Aqueous solution.  One containing water or watery in nature.

Aguifer.   A  geologic  formation  or  stratum that contains
water  and  transmits  it  from  one  point  to  another  in
quantities   sufficient   to   permit  economic  development
(capable of yielding an appreciable supply of water).

Aqueous Solution.  One containing water or watery in nature.

Arithmetic Mean.  The arithmetic mean of a number  of  items
is  obtained  by  adding all the items together and dividing
the total by the number of items.  It is  frequently  called
the average.  It is greatly affected by extreme values.

Azeotrope.   A  liquid  mixture  that  is characterized by a
constant minimum or maximum boiling point which is lower  or
higher  than that of any of the components and that distills
without change in composition.
                                 157

-------
Backwashing.  The  process  of  cleaning  a  rapid  sand  or
mechanical filter by reversing the flow of water.

Bacteria.   Unicellular,  plant-like microorganisms, lacking
chlorophyll.  Any water supply  contaminated  by  sewage  is
certain to contain a bacterial group called "coliform11.

Bateria, Coliform Group.  A group of bacteria, predominantly
inhabitants  of  the  intestine  of  man  but  also found on
vegetation, including all aerobic and facultative  anaerobic
gram-negative, non-sporeforming bacilli that ferment lactose
with  gas  formation.   This  group  includes five tribes of
which  the  very  great  majority  are  Eschericheae.    The
Eschericheae  tribe  comprises three genera and ten species,
of which  Escherichia  Coli  and  Aerobacter  Aerogenes  are
dominant.   The  Escherichia  Coli are normal inhabitants of
the intestine of man and all vertbrates  whereas  Aerobacter
Aerogenes  normally  are found on grain and plants, and only
to a varying degree in the intestine  of  man  and  animals.
Formerly  referred  to  as B. Coli, B. Coli group, and Coli-
Aerogenes Group.

Bacterial Growth.   All  bacteria  reguire  food  for  their
continued  life  and  growth  and  all  are  affected by the
conditions of their environment.  Like  human  beings,  they
consume food, they respire, they need moisture, they reguire
heat,   and  they  give  off  waste  products.   Their  food
requirements are very definite and have  been,  in  general,
already  outlined.   Without  an adequate food supply of the
type the specific organism requires, bacteria will not  grow
and  multiply at their maximum rate and they will therefore,
not perform their full and complete functions.

 (BADCT) NSPS  Effluent  Limitations.   Limitations  for  new
sources  which  are  based  on  the  application of the Best
Available Demonstrated Control Technology.  See NSPS.

Base.  A substance that in aqueous solution turns red litmus
blue,  furnishes hydroxyl ions and reacts  with  an  acid  to
form a salt and water only.

Batch  Process.  A process which has an intermittent flow of
raw materials into the  process and a resultant  intermittent
flow of product from the process.

BAT(BATEA)  Effluent  Limitations.   Limitations  for  point
sources, other than publicly owned  treatment  works,  which
are    based  on  the   application  of  the  Best  Available
Technology  Economically Achievable.  These limitations  must
be achieved by July  1,  1983.
                               158

-------
Benthic.   Attached to the bottom of a body of water.

Benthos.    Organisms  (fauna  and  flora)  that  live on the
bottoms of bodies of water.

Bioassay.  An assessment  which  is  made  by  using  living
organisms as the sensors.

Biochemical  Oxygen  Demand  (BOD).  A measure of the oxygen
required to oxidize the organic  material  in  a  sample  of
wastewater  by  natural  biological  process  under standard
conditions.  This test is presently universally accepted  as
the  yardstick  of  pollution  and is utilized as a means to
determine the degree  of  treatment  in  a  waste  treatment
process.    Usually  given  in  mg/1   (or ppm units), meaning
milligrams of oxygen required per liter  of  wastewater,  it
can also be expressed in pounds of total oxygen required per
wastewater  or  sludge batch.  The standard BOD is five days
at 20 degrees C.

Biota.  The flora and fauna  (plant and  animal  life)  of  a
stream or other water body.

Biological   Treatment   System.    A   system   that   uses
microorganisms to remove organic pollutant material  from  a
wastewater.

Blowdown.   Water intentionally discharged from a cooling or
heating   system   to   maintain   the   dissolved    solids
concentration  of  the  circulating  water  below a specific
critical level.  The removal of a  portion  of  any  process
flow to maintain the constituents of the flow within desired
levels.   Process may be intermittent or continuous.  2) The
water discharged from a boiler or cooling tower  to  dispose
of accumulated salts.

BOD5.   Biochemical  Oxygen  Demand   (BOD)  is the amount of
oxygen required by bacteria while  stabilizing  decomposable
organic  matter  under aerobic conditions.  The BOD test has
been developed on the basis of  a  5-day  incubation  period
(i, e. BOD5) .

Boiler Slowdown.  Wastewater resulting from purging of solid
and  waste materials from the boiler system.  A solids build
up in concentration as a result of water evaporation  (steam
generation) in the boiler.

BPT(BPCTCA)  Effluent  Limitations.   Limitations  for point
sources, other than publicly owned  treatment  works,  which
are based on the application of the Best Practicable Control
                               159

-------
Technology  Currently  Available.   These limitations must be
achieved by July 1, 1977.

Break Point.  The point at which impurities first appear  in
the  effluent  of  an  adsorption filter bed (e.g., granular
carbon) .

Break  Point  chlorination.    The  addition  of   sufficient
chlorine to destroy or oxidize all substances that creates a
chlorine  demand with an excess amount remaining in the free
residual state.

Brine.  Water saturated with a salt.

Buffer.   A solution containing either a weak  acid  and  its
salt  or  a  weak  base  and  its salt which thereby resists
changes in acidity or basicity, resists changes in pH.

Carbohydrat e.  A compound of carbon,  hydrogen  and  oxygen,
usually  having hydrogen and oxygen in the proportion of two
to one.

Carbonaceous.  Containing or composed of carbon.

Catalyst.  A substance which changes the rate of a  chemical
reaction but undergoes no permanent chemical change itself.

Cation.    The  ion  in  an  electrolyte  which  carries  the
positive charge and which migrates toward the cathode  under
the influence of a potential difference.

Caustic  Soda.   In  its  hydrated  form it is called sodium
hydroxide.  Soda ash is sodium carbonate.

Cellulose.  The fibrous constituent of trees  which  is  the
principal  raw  material  of paper and paperboard.  Commonly
thought of as a fibrous material of vegetable origin.

Chemical Oxygen Demand  (COD).  A measure of oxygen-consuming
capacity of organic and inorganic matter present in water or
wastewater.   It  is  expressed  as  the  amount  of  oxygen
consumed  from  a  chemical  oxidant in a specific test.  It
does not differentiate between stable and  unstable  organic
matter  and  thus does not correlate with biochemical oxygen
demand.

Chemical Synthesis.  The processes of  chemically  combining
two or more constituent  substances into a single substance.
                               160

-------
Chlorinatjon.   The application of chlorine to water, sewage
or  industrial  wastes,  generally  for   the   purpose   of
disinfection   but   frequently   for   accomplishing  other
biological or chemical results.

Clarification.  Process of removing turbidity and  suspended
solids  by  settling.  Chemicals can be added to improve and
speed up the settling process through coagulation.

Clarifier.  A basin or  tank  in  which  a  portion  of  the
material suspended in a wastewater is settled.

Clays.   Aluminum  silicates  less  than 0.002mm  (2.0 um) in
size.  Therefore, most clay  types  can  go  into  colloidal
suspension.

Coagulation.   The  clumping together of solids to make them
settle out of the sewage faster.  Coagulation of  solids  is
brought  about  with  the  use of certain chemicals, such as
lime, alum or polyelectrolytes.

Coagulation  and  Flocculation.   Processes   which   follow
sequentially.

Coagulation  Chemicals.  Hydrolyzable divalent and trivalent
metallic ions of aluminum, magnesium, and iron salts.   They
include  alum (aluminum sulfate), quicklime  (calcium oxide),
hydrated lime (calcium hydroxide), sulfuric acid,  anhydrous
ferric  chloride.  Lime and acid affect only the solution pH
which in turn causes coagulant precipitation, such  as  that
of magnesium.

Coliform.   Those bacteria which are most abundant in sewage
and in streams  containing  feces  and  other  bodily  waste
discharges.  See bacteria, coliform group,

Coliform  Organisms.   A  group  of  bacteria  recognized as
indicators of fecal pollution.

Colloid.  A finely divided dispersion of one material  (0.01-
10 micron-sized particles),  called  the  "dispersed  phase"
 (solid), in another material,  called the "dispersion medium"
 (liquid) .

Color Bodies.  Those complex molecules which impart color to
a solution.

Color  Units.  A solution with the color of unity contains  a
mg/1   of   metallic   platinum     (added    as    potassium
chloroplatinate   to  distilled  water).   Color  units  are
                               161

-------
defined against a platinum-cobalt standard and are based, as
are  all  the  other  water  quality  criteria,  upon  those
analytical  methods  described  in  Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater, 12  ed.,  Amer.  Public
Health Assoc., N.Y., 1967.

Combined  Sewer.   One  which  carries both sewage and storm
water run-off.

Composite Sample.  A combination of  individual  samples  of
wastes  taken at selected intervals, generally hourly for 24
hours,  to  minimize  the  effect  of  the   variations   in
individual   samples.   Individual  samples  making  up  the
composite may be of equal volume or be  roughly  apportioned
to the volume of flow of liquid at the time of sampling.

Composting.   The  biochemical stabilization of solid wastes
into a humus-like substance by producing and controlling  an
optimum environment for the process.

Concentration.  The total mass of the suspended or dissolved
particles  contained in a unit volume at a given temperature
and pressure.

Conductivity.   A  reliable   measurement   of   electrolyte
concentration   in   a   water   sample.   The  conductivity
measurement can be related to the concentration of dissolved
solids and is almost  directly  proportional  to  the  ionic
concentration of the total electrolytes.

Contact Stabilization.  Aerobic digestion.

Contact  Process  Wastewaters.   These are process-generated
wastewaters which have come in direct  or  indirect  contact
with  the reactants used in the process.  These include such
streams as contact cooling water, filtrates, centrates, wash
waters, etc.

Continuous Process.  A process which has a constant flow  of
raw  materials  into the process and resultant constant flow
of product from the process.

Contract Disposal.  Disposal of waste  products  through  an
outside party for a fee.

Crustaceae.   These  are  small animals ranging in  size from
0.2 to 0.3 millimeters long which move very rapidly  through
the  water   in   search of food.  They have recognizable head
and posterior sections.  They form  a  principal  source  of
                                 162

-------
food  for  small  fish  and  are found largely in relatively
fresh natural water.

Crystallization.  The formation of solid particles within  a
homogeneous phase.  Formation of crystals separates a solute
from  a  solution  and generally leaves impurities behind in
the mother liquid.

Curie.  3.7 x 10*0 disintegrations per second within a given
quantity of material.

Cyanide.  Total cyanide as determined by the test  procedure
specified in 40 CFR Part 136 (Federal Register, Vol. 38, no.
199, October 16, 1973).

Cyclone.   A  conical  shaped  vessel  for separating either
entrained solids or liquid materials from the  carrying  air
or  vapor.   The  vessel has a tangential entry nozzle at or
near the largest diameter, with an overhead exit for air  or
vapor and a lower exit for the more dense materials.

Cyanide  A.  Cyanides amendable to chlorination as described
in "1972 Annual Book of ASTM Standards"  1972:   Standard  D
2036-72, Method B, p. 553.

Degreasing.   The  process of removing greases and oils from
sewage, waste and sludge.

Demineralization.  The total removal of all ions.

Denitrification.  Bacterial mediated reduction of nitrate to
nitrite.  Other bacteria may act on the nitrite reducing  it
to  ammonia  and  finally N2 gas.  This reduction of nitrate
occurs under anaerobic  conditions.   The  nitrate  replaces
oxygen  as  an  electron  acceptor  during the metabolism of
carbon compounds under anaerobic conditions.   A  biological
process  in  which gaseous nitrogen is produced from nitrite
and  nitrate.    The   heterotrophic   microoganisms   which
participate   in   this   process   include   pseudomonades,
achromobacters  and bacilli.

Derivative.  A  substance  extracted  from  another  body  or
substance.

Desorption.  The opposite of adsorption.  A phenomenon where
an adsorbed molecule leaves the surface of the adsorbent.

Diluent.  A diluting agent.
                                163

-------
Disinfection.   The  process  of  killing the larger portion
(but not necessarily all) of the harmful  and  objectionable
microorganisms in or on a medium.

Dissolved  Air  Flotation.   The  term "flotation" indicates
something  floated  on  or  at  the  surface  of  a  liquid.
Dissolved  air  flotation  thickening is a process that adds
energy in the form of air bubbles, which become attached  to
suspended  sludge  particles, increasing the buoyancy of the
particles and producing more positive flotation.

Dissolved Oxygen  (DO).   The  oxygen  dissolved  in  sewage,
water   or   other  liquids,  usually  expressed  either  in
milligrams per liter or percent of saturation.   It  is  the
test used in BOD determination.

Distillation.   The separation, by vaporization, of a liquid
mixture of miscible and volatile substance  into  individual
components,  or,  in some cases, into a group of components.
The process of raising the temperature of a  liquid  to  the
boiling  point  and condensing the resultant vapor to liquid
form by cooling.  It is used to  remove  substances  from  a
liquid  or  to  obtain a pure liquid from one which contains
impurities or which is a mixture of several  liquids  having
different  boiling  temperatures.   Used in the treatment of
fermentation products, yeast,  etc.,  and  other  wastes  to
remove recoverable products.

DO  Units.  The units of measurement used are milligrams per
liter  (mg/1) and parts per  million   (ppm),  where  mg/1  is
defined  as  the  actual weight of oxygen per liter of water
and ppm is defined as the  parts  actual  weight  of  oxygen
dissolved  in a million parts weight of water, i.e., a pound
of oxygen in a million  pounds  of  water  is  1  ppm.   For
practical  purposes in pollution control work, these two are
used interchangeably; the density of water is so close to   1
g/cm3  that the error is negligible.  Similarly, the changes
in  volume  of  oxygen  with  changes  in  temperature   are
insignificant.   This,  however,  is not true if sensors are
calibrated in percent saturation rather than in mg/1 or ppm.
In that case, both temperature and barometric pressure  must
be taken into consideration.

Drift.  Entrained water  carried from a cooling device by the
exhaust air.

Dual   Media.   A  deep-bed  filtration  system  utilizing two
separate and discrete  layers  of  dissimilar  media   (e.g. ,
anthracite   and   sand)   placed  one  on  top of the other to
perform the  filtration function.
                                164

-------
Ecology*  The science of the interrelations  between  living
organisms and their environment.

Effluent.   A  liquid  which  leaves  a  unit  operation  or
process.  Sewage,  water  or  other  liquids,  partially  or
completely  treated  or in their natural states, flowing out
of a reservoir basin, treatment  plant  or  any  other  unit
operation.  An influent is the incoming stream.

Elution.   (1)  The process of washing out, or removinq with
the use of a solvent.   (2) In an ion exchange process it  is
defined  as  the  stripping  of  adsorbed  ions  from an ion
exchange  resin  by  passing  throuqh  the  resin  solutions
containing other ions in relatively high concentrations.

Elutriation.   A  process of sludge conditioning whereby the
sludge is washed, either with fresh water or plant effluent,
to reduce the sludqe alkalinity  and  fine  particles,  thus
decreasing  the  amount  of  required  coagulant  in further
treatment steps, or in sludge dewatering.

Emulsion.  Emulsion is a suspension of fine droplets of  one
liquid in another.

Entrainment  Separator.   A  device  to remove liquid and/or
solids from a gas stream.  Energy source is usually  derived
from pressure drop to create centrifugal force.

Environment.    The  sum  of  all  external  influences  and
conditions affecting the life  and  the  development  of  an
organism.

Equalization  Basin.  A holding basin in which variations in
flow and composition of a liquid are averaged,  such  basins
are  used to provide a flow of reasonably uniform volume and
composition to a treatment unit.

Esterification.  This generally involves the combination  of
an alcohol and an organic acid to produce an ester and water
The  reaction  is  carried  out  in  the  liquid phase, with
aqueous sulfuric acid as the catalyst.  The use of  sulfuric
acid  has  in  the  past  caused this type of reaction to be
called suIfation.

Eutrophication.  The process in  which  the  life-sustaining
quality  of  a  body  of  water is lost or diminished  (e.g.,
aging or filling in of lakes).  A eutrophic condition is one
in which the water is rich in nutrients but has  a  seasonal
oxygen deficiency.
                                165

-------
Evapotranspiration.  The loss of water from the soil both by
evaporation  and  by  transpiration  from the plants growing
thereon.

Facultative.  Having  the  power  to  live  under  different
conditons (either with or without oxygen).

Facultative  lagoon.   A  combination  of  the  aerobic  and
anaerobic lagoons.  It is divided  by  loading  and  thermal
stratifications  into  an  aerobic  surface and an anaerobic
bottom, therefore the principles of  both  the  aerobic  and
anaerobic processes apply.

Fatty  Acids.   An  organic  acid obtained by the hydrolysis
(saponification) of natural fats and oils, e.g., stearic and
palmitic acids.  These acids are monobasic and  may  or  may
not contain some double bonds.  They usually contain sixteen
or more carbon atoms.

Fauna.   The  animal  life adapted for living in a specified
environment.

Fermentation.  Oxidative decomposition of complex substances
through the  action  of  enzymes  or  ferments  produced  by
microorganisms.

Filter, Trickling.  A filter consisting of an artificial bed
of  coarse  material, such as broken stone, clinkers, slate,
slats or brush, over which sewage is distributed and applied
in drops, films for spray, from  troughs,  drippers,  moving
distributors  or fixed nozzles.  The sewage trickles through
to the underdrains and has the opportunity to form  zoogleal
slimes which clarify and oxidize the sewage.

Filter,  Vacuum.   A filter consisting of a cylindrical drum
mounted on a horizontal  axis  and  covered  with  a  filter
cloth.   The  filter  revolves with a partial submergence in
the liguid, and a vacuum is maintained under the  cloth  for
the larger part of each revolution to extract moisture.  The
cake is scraped off continuously.

Filtrate.   The  liquid  fraction that is separated from the
solids fraction of a slurry through filtration.

Filtration, Biological.  The process  of  passing  a  liquid
through a biological filter containing media on the surfaces
of  which zoogleal films develop that absorb and adsorb fine
suspended, colloidal and dissolved solids and  that  release
various biochemical  end products.
                               166

-------
Plocculants.   Those  water-soluble organic polyelect.rolyt.es
that  are  used  alone  or  in  conjunction  with  inorganic
coagulants   such  as  lime,  alum  or  ferric  chloride  or
coagulant aids to agglomerate solids  suspended  in  aqueous
systems  or  both. The large dense floes resulting from this
process permit more rapid and more  efficient  solids-liquid
separations.

Flocculation.   The  formation  of  floes.  The process step
following  the  coagulation-precipitation  reactions   which
consists  of  bringing together the colloidal particles.  It
is the  agglomeration  by  organic  polyelectroytes  of  the
small,  slowly settling floes formed during coagulation into
large floes which settle rapidly.

Flora.  The plant life characteristic of a region.

Flotation,  A method of  raising  suspended  matter  to  the
surface of the liquid in a tank as scum-by aeration, vacuum,
evolution of gas, chemicals, electrolysis, heat or bacterial
decomposition  and  the  subsequent  removal  of the scum by
skimming.

Fractionation  (or Fractional Distillation).  The  separation
of  constituents,  or  group  of  constituents,  of a liquid
mixture of miscible and volatile substances by  vaporization
and recondensing at specific boiling point ranges.

Fungus.   A  vegetable  cellular  organism  that subsists on
organic material, such as bacteria.

Gland.  A device utilizing a  soft  wear-resistant  material
used  to  minimize  leakage between a rotating shaft and the
stationary portion of a vessel such as a pump.

Gland Water.  Water used to lubricate  a  gland.   Sometimes
called "packing water."

Grab  Sample.    (1)  Instantaneous  sampling.    (2) A sample
taken at a random place in space and time.

Grease.  In sewage, grease includes fats, waxes, free   fatty
acids,  calcium  and magnesium soaps, mineral oils and  other
nonfatty materials.  The type of solvent to be used for  its
extraction should be stated.

Grit  Chamber.   A small detention chamber or an enlargement
of a sewer designed to reduce the velocity of  flow  of  the
liquid  and  permit  the  separation of mineral from organic
solids by differential sedimentation.
                                 167

-------
Groundwater.  The body of water  that  is  retained  in  the
saturated  zone which tends to move by hydraulic gradient to
lower levels.

Hardness.   A  measure  of  the  capacity   of   water   for
precipitating  soap.   It  is  reported as the hardness that
would  be  produced  if  a  certain  amount  of  CaCO3  were
dissolved  in water.  More than one ion contributes to water
hardness.  The "Glossary of  Water  and  Wastewater  Control
Engineering" defines hardness as: A characteristic of water,
imparted  by  salts  of calcium, magnesium, and ion, such as
bicarbonates, carbonates, sulfates, chlorides, and nitrates,
that  causes  curdling  of  soap,  deposition  of  scale  in
boilers,  damage in some industrial processes, and sometimes
objectionable taste.  Calcium and  magnesium  are  the  most
significant constituents.

Heavy Metals.  A general name given for the ions of metallic
elements,   such   as  copper,  zinc,  iron,  chromium,  and
aluminum.  They are normally removed from  a  wastewater  by
the   formation  of  an  insoluble  precipitate   (usually  a
metallic hydroxide).

Hydrocarbon.   A  compound  containing   only   carbon   and
hydrogen.

Hydrolysis.   A chemical reaction in which water reacts with
another substance to form one or more new substances.

Incineration.  The combustion  (by burning) of matter   (e.g.,
wastewater sludge).

Influent.   Any sewage, water or other liquid, either raw or
partly treated, flowing into a reservoir,  basin,  treatment
plant,  or  any  part  thereof.   The influent is the stream
entering a  unit  operation;  the  effluent  is  the  stream
leaving it.

In-Piant    Measures.    Technology   applied   within   the
manufacturing process to reduce or eliminate  pollutants  in
the  raw  waste water.  Sometimes called "internal measures"
or "internal controls".

Ipn.  An atom or group of  atoms  possessing  an  electrical
charge.

Ion  Exchange.   A  reversible interchange of ions between a
liquid and  a  solid  involving  no  radical  change  in  the
structure   of the  solid.  The solid can be a natural zeolite
or a synthetic resin, also called  polyelectrolyte.   Cation
                                 168

-------
exchange  resins  exchange  their  hydrogen  ions  for metal
cations in the liquid.  Anion exchange resins exchange their
hydroxyl ions for anions such as  nitrates  in  the  liquid.
When  the  ion-retaining capacity of the resin is exhausted,
it must be regenerated.  Cation resins are regenerated  with
acids and anion resins with bases.

Lacrimal.  Tear forming fluid.

Lagoons.   An  oxidation  pond that received sewage which is
not settled or biologically treated.

LC 50.  A lethal concentration  for  50%  of  test  animals.
Numerically  the same as TLm.  A statistical estimate of the
toxicant,  such  as  pesticide   concentration,   in   water
necessary  to  kill  50%  of  the  test  organisms  within a
specified time under standardized conditions (usually  24,48
or 96 hr) .

Leach.   To  dissolve  out  by  the  action of a percolating
liquid, such as water, seeping through a sanitary landfill.

Lime.  Limestone  is  an  accumulation  of  organic  remains
consisting  mostly  of  calcium  carbonate.  When burned, it
yields lime which is  a  solid.   The  hydrated  form  of  a
chemical lime is calcium hydroxide.

Liquid-liquid-extraction.    The   process   by   which  the
constituents of a solution are separated  by  causing  their
unequal distribution between two insoluble liquids.

Maximum Day Limitation.  The effluent limitation value equal
to  the maximum for one day and is the value to be published
by the EPA in the Federal Register.

Maximum Thirty  Day  Limitation.   The  effluent  limitation
value  for  which  the  average  of  daily values for thirty
consecutive days shall not exceed and is  the  value  to  be
published by the EPA in the Federal Register.

Mean.   The  arithmetic  average  of  the  individual sample
values.

Median.  In a statistical array, the value  having  as  many
cases larger in value as cases smaller in value.

Median Lethal Dose  (LC50).  The dose lethal to 50 percent of
a  group of test organisms for a specified period.  The dose
material may be ingested or injected.
                                169

-------
Median Tolerance Limit (TLm)«  In toxicological studies, the
concentration of pollutants at which 50 percent of the  test
animals can survive for a specified period of exposure.

Microbial.  Of or pertaining to a pathogenic bacterium.

Molecular   Weight.   The  relative  weight  of  a  molecule
compared to the weight of an atom of carbon taken as exactly
12.00; the sum of the atomic  weights  of  the  atoms  in  a
molecule.

Mollusk   (mollusca).   A  large animal group including those
forms  popularly  called  shellfish    (but   not   including
crustaceans).  All have a soft unsegmented body protected in
most  instances by a calcareous shell.  Examples are snails,
mussels, clams, and oysters.

Mycelium.  The  mass  of  filaments  which  constitutes  the
vegetative body of fungi.

Navigable  Waters.   Includes  all  navigable  waters of the
United States; tributaries of navigable  waters;  interstate
waters;  intrastate  lakes,  rivers  and  streams  which are
utilized by interstate travellers for  recreational or  other
purposes;  intrastate  lakes,  rivers  and streams from which
fish or shellfish are taken and sold in interstate commerce;
and intrastate lakes, rivers and streams which are  utilized
for   industrial   purposes   by  industries  in  interstate
commerce.

N eutr aliz at ion.    The  restoration  of  the   hydrogen   or
hydroxyl  ion  balance  in  a  solution  so  that  the ionic
concentration  of  each  are  equal.   Conventionally,   the
notation  "pH"  (puissance d'hydrogen) is used to describe the
hydrogen  ion  concentration  or activity present in a given
solution.  For dilute solutions of  strong acids, i.e., acids
which are considered to be completely  dissociate  (ionized in
solution), activity eguals concentration.

New Source.  Any facility from which there is or  may  be   a
discharge  of  pollutants,  the  construction  of  which  is
commenced after  the  publication   of  proposed  regulations
prescribing  a   standard of performance under section 306 of
the Act.

Nitrate.  Salt of  nitric acid, e.g., sodium nitrate, NaNO.3.

Nitrate  Nitrogen.   The final decomposition  product  of  the
organic  nitrogen compounds.  Determination of this parameter
indicates the degree of waste treatment.
                                  170

-------
Nitrification.   Bacterial  mediated oxidation of ammonia to
nitrite.  Nitrite can be further oxidized to nitrate.  These
reactions are  brought  about  by  only  a  few  specialized
bacterial  species.   Nitrosomonias  sp. and Nitrococcus sp.
oxidize ammonia to nitrite which is oxidized to  nitrate  by
Nitrobacter sp.

Nitrifiers.   Bacteria which causes the oxidation of ammonia
to nitrites and nitrates.

Nitrite Nitrogen.  An intermediate  stage  in  the  decompo-
sition  of  organic nitrogen to the nitrate form.  Tests for
nitrite nitrogen can determine whether the applied treatment1
is sufficient.

Nitrobacteria.  Those bacteria  (an autotrophic  genus)   that
oxidize nitrite nitrogen to nitrate nitrogen.

Nitrogen  Cycle.   Organic  nitrogen in waste is oxidized by
bacteria into ammonia.  If oxygen  is  present,  ammonia  is
bacterially  oxidized  first  into  nitrite  and  then  into
nitrate.  If oxygen is not present, nitrite and nitrate  are
bacterially  reduced  to  nitrogen  gas.  The second step is
called "denitrification."

Nit roge n F i x a ti on.  Biological nitrogen fixation is  carried
on by a selected group of bacteria which take up atmospheric
nitrogen  and  convert  it to amine groups or for amino acid
synthesis.

Nitrospmonas,  Bacteria which oxidize ammonia nitrogen  into
nitrite nitrogen; an aerobic autotrophic life form.

N on - con ta c t Cooling Water.  Water used for cooling that does
not   come  into  direct  contact  with  any  raw  material,
intermediate product, waste product or finished product.

Non-contact Process Wastewaters.  Wastewaters generated by  a
manufacturing process which have not come in direct  contact
with  the reactants used in the process.  These include such
streams  as  non-contact  cooling   water,   cooling   tower
blowdown, boiler blowdcwn, etc.

Nonputrescible.    Incapable  of  organic  decomposition  or
decay.

Normal Solution.  A solution that contains  1  gm  molecular
weight  of  the  dissolved substance divided by the  hydrogen
eguivalent of the substance  (that is, one  gram  equivalent)
per  liter  of  solution.   Thus,  a  one normal solution of
                                171

-------
sulfuric acid (H2SOU, mol. wt. 98)  contains (98/2)  49gms  of
H2SOJ* per liter.

NPDES.   National Pollution Discharge Elimination System.  A
federal program requiring manufacturers to obtain permits to
discharge plant effluents to the nation's water courses.

NSPS.  New Source Performance Standards.  See BADCT.

Nutrient.  Any substance assimilated by  an  organism  which
promotes growth and replacement of cellular constituents.

Operations  and  Maintenance.  Costs required to operate and
maintain  pollution  abatement  equipment  including  labor,
material, insurance, taxes, solid waste disposal, etc.

Organic  Loading,  in the activated sludge process, the food
to micoorganisms   (F/M)  ratio  defined  as  the  amount  of
biodegradable  material  available  to  a  given  amount  of
microorganisms per unit of time.

Oxidation.  A process in which an atom  or  group  of  atoms
loses electrons; the combination of a substance with oxygen,
accompanied  with  the release of energy.  The oxidized atom
usually becomes a positive ion  while  the  oxidizing  agent
becomes a negative ion in  (chlorination for example).

Oxidation  Pond.   A man-made lake or body of water in which
wastes are consumed by bacteria.  It  receives  an  influent
which  has  gone  through  primary  treatment while a lagoon
receives raw untreated sewage.

Oxidation Reduction  (OR).  A class of chemical reactions  in
which  one  of  the  reacting  species  gives  up  electrons
 (oxidation) while another species in  the  reaction  accepts
electrons   (reduction).  At one time, the term oxidation was
restricted  to  reactions   involving   hydrogen.    Current
chemical  technology  has broadened the scope of these terms
to include all reactions where electrons are  given  up  and
taken  on  by  reacting  species;  in fact, the donating and
accepting of electrons must take place simultaneously.

Oxidation Reduction Potential   (ORP).   A  measurement  that
indicates  the  activity ratio of the oxidizing and reducing
species present.

Oxygen,  Available.   The  quantity  of  atmospheric  oxygen
dissolved  in  the  water  of  a  stream;  the  quantity  of
dissolved oxygen available  for  the  oxidation  of  organic
matter in sewage.
                               172

-------
Oxygen,  Dissolved.   The  oxygen (usually designated as DO)
dissolved in sewage, water or  another  liquid  and  usually
expressed in parts per million or percent of saturation.

Ozonation.    A   water   or  wastewater  treatment  process
involving the use of ozone as an oxidation agent.

Ozone.  That molecular oxygen with  three  atoms  of  oxygen
forming  each  molecule.   The  third atom of oxygen in each
molecule of ozone is  loosely  bound  and  easily  released.
Ozone  is  used  sometimes for the disinfection of water but
more  frequently  for  the  oxidation   of   taste-producing
substances,   such   as   phenol,   in  water  and  for  the
neutralization of odors in gases or air.

Parts  Per  Million   (ppm).   Parts  by  weight  in   sewage
analysis;  ppm  by  weight  is equal to milligrams per liter
divided by the specific gravity.  It should be noted that in
water  analysis  ppm  is  always  understood  to   imply   a
weight/weight ratio, even though in practice a volume may be
measured instead of a weight.

Pathogenic.  Disease producing.

Payloader.   A  large  piece  of  heavy  equipment  used for
transporting large volumes at a time.

Percolation.  The  movement  of  water  beneath  the  ground
surface  both  vertically  and  horizontally,  but above the
groundwater table.

Permeability.  The ability of a substance   (soil)  to  allow
appreciable  movement of water through it when saturated and
actuated by a hydrostatic pressure.

pH.   The   negative   logarithm   of   the   hydrogen   ion
concentration  or  activity  in  a  solution.   The number 7
indicates  neutrality,  numbers   less   than   7   indicate
increasing  acidity,  and  numbers  greater  than 7 indicate
increasing alkalinity.

Phenol.  Class of cyclic organic derivatives with the  basic
chemical formula C6H5OH.

Phosphate.   Phosphate  ions  exist  as  an ester or salt of
phosphoric  acid,  such  as  calcium  phosphate  rock.    In
municipal  wastewater,  it  is  most  frequently  present as
orthophosphate.
                                173

-------
Phosphorus Precipitation.  The addition of  the  multivalent
metallic ions of calcium, iron and aluminum to wastewater to
form insoluble precipitates with phosphorus.

Photosynthesis.   The mechanism by which chlorophyll-bearing
plant utilize  light  energy  to  produce  carbohydrate  and
oxygen  from  carbon  dioxide  and  water   (the  reverse  of
respiration).

Physical/Chemical Treatment System.  A system that  utilizes
physical  (i.e.,  sedimentation, filtration, centrifugation,
activated carbon, reverse  osmosis,  etc.)  and/or  chemical
means (i.e.,  coagulation, oxidation, precipitation, etc.) to
treat wastewaters.

Phytoplankton.    (1)  Collective  term  for  the  plants and
plantlike organisms  present  in  plankton;  contrasts  with
zooplankton.

Plankton..   Collective  term  for  the  passively flating or
drifting flora and  fauna  of  a  body  of  water;  consists
largely of microscopic organisms.

Point   Source.   Any  discernible,  confined  and  discrete
conveyance, including but not limited to  any  pipe,  ditch,
channel, tunnel,  conduit, well, discrete  fissure, container,
rolling  stock,   concentrated  animal  feeding operation, or
vessel or other floating craft, from which  pollutants are or
may be discharged.

Pollutional Load.  A measure of the strength of a wastewater
in terms of its solids or  oxygen-demanding characteristics
or other objectionable physical and chemical characteristics
or  both  or in terms of harm done to receiving waters.  The
pollutional  load imposed  on  sewage  treatment  works  is
expressed as eguivalent  population.

Polyelectrolytes.   Synthetic  chemicals   (polymers) used to
speed up the removal of  solids from sewage.  These chemicals
cause solids to coagulate or  clump  together  more  rapidly
than do chemicals such as alum or lime.   They  can be anionic
 (-charge) ,   nonionic   (+ and -charge) or  cationic  (+charge—
the most popular) .  They are  linear  or  branched  organic
polymers.    They   have high molecular weights  and are water-
soluble.     Compounds    similar   to   the   polyelectrolyte
flocculants  include   surface~active agents and ion exchange
resins.   The former are  low molecular weight,  water  soluble
compounds  used   to disperse solids in aqueous systems.  The
latter  are high  molecular weight, water-insoluble  compounds
                                 174

-------
used  to selectively replace certain ions already present in
water with more desirable or less noxious ions.

Population Equivalent (PE).   An expression of  the  relative
strength  of  a  waste  (usually industrial)  in terms of its
equivalent in domestic waste, expressed  as  the  population
that   would  produce  the  equivalent  domestic  waste.   A
population equivalent  of  160  million  persons  means  the
pollutional effect equivalent to raw sewage from 160 million
persons;  0.17  pounds  BOD   (the oxygen demand of untreated
wastes from one person)  = 1 PE.

Potable Water.  Drinking water sufficiently pure  for  human
use.

Potash.   Potassium  compounds used in agriculture and other
manufacturing segments.   Potassium carbonate can be obtained
from wood ashes.  The mineral potash is usually  a  muriate.
Caustic potash is its hydrated form.

Preaeration .   A preparatory treatment of sewage consisting
of aeration to remove gases and add oxygen or to promote the
flotation of grease and aid coagulation.

Precipitation.  The phenomenon which occurs when a substance
held in solution passes out  of  that  solution  into  solid
form.   The adjustment of pH can reduce solubility and cause
precipitation.  Alum and lime are frequently used  chemicals
in   such   operations  as  water  softening  or  alkalinity
reduction.

Pretreatment.  Any  wastewater  treatment  process  used  to
partially reduce the pollution load before the wastewater is
introduced  into  a  main  sewer  system  or  delivered to a
treatment plant for substantial reduction of  the  pollution
load.

Primary   Clarifier.   The  settling  tank  into  which  the
wastewater  (sewage) first enters and from which  the  solids
are removed as raw sludge.

Primary Sludge.  Sludge from primary clarifiers.

Primary  Treatment.   The removal of material that floats or
will settle in sewage by using screens to catch the floating
objects and tanks for the heavy matter to  settle  in.   The
first  major treatment and sometimes the only treatment in a
waste-treatment   works,   usually   sedimentation    and/or
flocculation  and  digestion.   The  removal  of  a moderate
percentage of suspended matter but little or no colloidal or
                                175

-------
dissolved matter.  May  effect  the  removal  of  30  to  35
percent or more BOD.

Process  Wastewater.   Any water which, during manufacturing
or processing, comes into direct  contact  with  or  results
from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate
product, finished product, by-product, or waste product.

Process  Water.   Any  water (solid, liquid or vapor) which,
during the manufacturing process, comes into direct  contact
with  any  raw  material,  intermediate product, by-product,
waste product, or finished product.

Putrefaction.  Biological decomposition  of  organic  matter
accompanied  by  the  production  of  foul-smelling products
associated with anaerobic conditions.

Pyrolysis.  The high temperature  decomposition  of  complex
molecules that occurs in the presence of an inert atmosphere
(no oxygen present to support combustion).

Quench.  A liquid used for cooling purposes.

Quiesance.  Quiet, still, inactive.

Raw  waste Load  (RWL).  The quantity  (kg) of pollutant being
discharged in a plant1s wastewater.  measured  in  terms  of
some  common  denominator   (i.e., kkg of production or m2 of
floor area).

Receiving Waters.  Rivers, lakes, oceans  or  other  courses
that receive treated or untreated wastewaters.

Recirculation.   The refiltration of either all or a portion
of the effluent in a  high-rate  trickling  filter  for  the
purpose  of  maintaining  a  uniform  high  rate through the
filter.  (2)  The return of effluent to the incoming flow.

Reduction.  A process in which an atom  (or group  of  atoms)
gain electrons.  Such a process always requires the input of
energy.

Refractory   Organics.   Organic  materials  that  are  only
partially   degraded   or   entirely   nonbiodegradable   in
biological  waste  treatment processes.  Refractory organics
include  detergents,  pesticides,  color-  and  odor-causing
agents,  tannins, lignins, ethers, olefins, alcohols, amines,
aldehydes, ketones, etc.
                                 176

-------
Residual  Chlorine.   The  amount  of  chlorine  left in the
treated water that is available to oxidize  contaminants  if
they  enter  the  stream.   It  is  usually  in  the form of
hypochlorous acid of hypochlorite  ion  or  of  one  of  the
chloramines.   Hypochlorite  concentration  alone  is called
"free chlorine residual" while together with the  chloramine
concentration   their   sum  is  called  "combined  chlorine
residual."

Respiration.  Biological oxidation within a life  form;  the
most  likely  energy  source  for  animals  (the  reverse of
photosynthesis) .

Retention Time.   Volume of the vessel divided  by  the  flow
rate through the vessel.

Retort.   A  vessel,  commonly a glass bulb with a long neck
bent downward, used for distilling or decomposing substances
fcy heat.

Salt.  A compound made up of the positive ion of a base  and
the negative ion of an acid.

Sanitary  Landfill.   A sanitary landfill is a land disposal
site employing an engineered method of  disposing  of  solid
wastes  on  land  in  a  manner that minimizes environmental
hazards by spreading the wastes in thin  layers,  compacting
the  solid  wastes  to  the  smallest  practical volume, and
applying cover material at the end of  each  operating  day.
There  are  two basic sanitary landfill methods; trench fill
and area or ramp fill.  The method chosen  is  dependent  on
many  factors  such  as  drainage  and  type  of soil at the
proposed landfill site.

Sanitary Sewers.  In a separate system, pipes in a city that
carry only domestic wastewater.  The storm water  runoff  is
handled by a separate system of pipes.

Screening.   The  removal of relatively coarse, floating and
suspended solids by straining through racks or screens.

Secondary  Treatment.   The  second  step  in   most   waste
treatment systems in which bacteria consume the organic part
of  the wastes.   This is accomplished by bringing the  sewage
and bacteria together either in trickling filters or in  the
activated sludge process.

Sedimentation,  Final.   The  settling  of  partly  settled,
flocculated or oxidized sewage in a final tank.    (The  term
settling is preferred).
                                 177

-------
Sedimentation, Plain.  The sedimentation of suspended matter
in  a liquid unaided by chemicals or other special means and
without any provision for the decomposition of the deposited
solids in contact with the sewage.  (The term plain settling
is preferred) .

Seed,  To introduce microorganisms into a culture medium.

Settleable Solids.  Suspended solids which will  settle  out
of a liquid waste in a given period of time.

Settling  Velocity.  The terminal rate of fall of a particle
through a fluid as induced  by  gravity  or  other  external
forces.

Sewage, Raw.  Untreated sewage.

Sewage,  Storm.   The  liquid  flowing  in  sewers during or
following  a  period  of  heavy   rainfall   and   resulting
therefrom.

Sewerage.   A  comprehensive  term which includes facilities
for collecting, pumping, treating, and disposing of  sewage;
the sewerage system and the sewage treatment works.

Silt.   Particles with a size distribution of 0.05mm-0.002mm
 (2.0mm).  Silt is high in quartz and feldspar.

Skimming.  Removing  floating solids  (scum).

Sludge, Activated.  Sludge floe produced in raw  or  settled
sewage   by  the  growth  of  zoogleal  tacteria  and  other
organisms  in  the   presence   of   dissolved   oxygen   and
accumulated  in   sufficient  concentration  by returning the
floe previously formed.

Sludge, Age.  The ratio of the weight of volatile solids  in
the digester to the  weight of volatile solids added per day.
There   is  a  maximum sludge age beyond which no significant
reduction in  the  concentration  of  volatile  solids  will
occur.

Sludge,   Digested.    Sludge   digested    under   anaerobic
conditions until  the volatile  content  has  been  reduced,
usually by approximately  50 percent or more.

Solution.   A  homogeneous mixture of two or more substances
of dissimilar molecular structure.   In a solution, there  is
a dissolving  medium-solvent  and   a  dissolved  substance-
 solute.
                                 178

-------
Solvent..  A liquid which reacts with a material, bringing it
into soluti on.

solvent Extraction.  A mixture of two components is  treated
by  a  solvent  that preferentially dissolves one or more of
the components in the mixture.  The solvent in  the  extract
leaving the extractor is usually recovered and reused.

Sparger.   An  air  diffuser designed to give large bubbles,
used singly  or  in  combination  with  mechanical  aeration
devices.

Sparging.   Heating a liquid by means of live steam entering
through a perforated or nozzled pipe  (used, for example,  to
coagulate blood solids in meat processing).

Standard  Deviation.   The square root of the variance which
describes the variability within the sampling  data  on  the
basis  of the deviation of individual sample values from the
mean.

Standard Raw Waste jLoad fSRWL).  The raw  waste  load  which
characterizes  a  specific  subcategory.   This is generally
computed by averaging the plant raw  waste  loads  within  a
subcategory.

Steam Distillation.  Fractionation in which steam introduced
as  one  of  the  vapors  or  in  which steam is injected to
provide the heat of the system.

Sterilization.   The  complete  destuction  of  all   living
organisms  in or on a medium; heat to 121°C at 5 psig for 15
minutes.

Stillwell.    A   pipe,   chamber,   or   compartment   with
comparatively  small  inlet  or  inlets communicating with a
main body of water.  Its  purpose  is  to  dampen  waves  or
surges  while  permitting the water level within the well to
rise and fall with the major fluctuations of the  main  body
of  water.   it  is  used  with  water-measuring  devices to
improve accuracy of measurement.

Stoichiometric.  Characterized  by  being  a  proportion  of
substances  exactly  right  for a specific chemical reaction
with no excess of any reactant or product.

Stripper.  A device in which relatively volatile  components
are  removed from a mixture by distillation or by passage of
steam through the mixture.
                                  179

-------
Substrate.   (1)    Reactant  portion  of   any   biochemical
reaction,  material  transformed  into  a  product.   (2)  Any
substance used as a nutrient by a  microorganism.   (3)   The
liquor  in  which activated sludge or other material is kept
in suspension.

Sulfate.  The final decomposition product of organic  sulfur
compounds.

Supernatant.  Floating above or on the surface.

Surge tank.  A tank for absorbing and dampening the wavelike
motion  of a volume of liquid; an in-plant storage tank that
acts as a flow buffer between process tanks.

Suspended Solids.  The wastes that will not sink  or  settle
in  sewage.   The quantity of material deposited on a filter
when a liquid is drawn through a Gooch crucible.

Synergistjc.  An effect which is more than the  sum  of  the
individual contributors.

Synergistic  Effect.   The  simultaneous  action of separate
agents which, together, have greater total effect  than  the
sum of their individual effects.

Tertiary  Treatment.   A  process  to remove practically all
solids  and  organic  matter  from   wastewater.    Granular
activated carbon filtration is a tertiary treatment process.
Phosphate  removal  by chemical coagulation is also regarded
as a step in tertiary treatment.

Thermal Oxidation.  The wet combustion of organic  materials
through the application of heat in the presence of oxygen.

TKN  (Total Kieldahi Nitrogen).  Includes ammonia and organic
nitrogen  but does not include nitrite and nitrate nitrogen.
The  sum of free nitrogen and organic nitrogen in a sample.

TLm.  The concentration that kills 50% of the test organisms
within a  specified time span, usually in 96 hours  or  less.
Most  of  the  available  toxicity  data are reported as the
median tolerance limit  (TLm).  This system of reporting  has
been misapplied by some who have erroneously inferred that a
TLm value is a safe value, whereas it is merely  the level at
which half of the test organisms are killed.  In many cases,
the  differences  are  great  between TLm concentrations and
concentrations that are low enough  to  permit   reproduction
and  growth.  LC50 has the same numerical value as TLm.
                               180

-------
Total  Organic  Carbon  (TOG).    A  measure of the amount of
carbon in a sample originating  from  organic  matter  only.
The  test  is  run  by  burning the sample and measuring the
carbon dioxide produced.

Total Solids.  The total amount of solids  in  a  wastewater
both in solution and suspension.

Total  Volatile  Solids JTVSJ_.   The quantity of residue lost
after the ignition of total solids.

Transport Water.  Water used to carry insoluble solids.

Trickling Filter.  A bed of rocks or stones.  The sewage  is
trickled  over  the  bed so that bacteria can break down the
organic wastes.  The bacteria collect on the stones  through
repeated use of the filter.

Turbidity.  A measure of the amount of solids in suspension.
The  units  of  measurement  are  parts per million  (ppm) of
suspended solids  or  Jackson  Candle  Units.   The  Jackson
Candle Unit  (JCU) is defined as the turbidity resulting from
1  ppm  of  fuller's  earth (and inert mineral) suspended in
water.  The relationship between  ppm  and  JCU  depends  on
particle  size,  color, index of refraction; the correlation
between  the  two  is  generally  not  possible.   Turbidity
instruments  utilize  a light beam projected into the sample
fluid to effect a measurement.  The light beam is  scattered
by solids in suspension, and the degree of light attenuation
or   the  amount  of  scattered  light  can  be  related  to
turbidity.  The light scattered is called the Tyndall effect
and the scattered light the Tyndall light.  An expression of
the optical property of a sample which causes  light  to  be
scattered  and  absorbed rather than transmitted in straight
lines through the sample.

Viruses.     (1)   An   obligate   intracellular    parasitic
microorganism  smaller than bacteria.  Most can pass through
filters that retain bacteria.   (2) The smallest   (10-300  urn
in   diameter)  form  capable  of  producing  infection  and
diseases in man or other  large  species.   Occurring  in   a
variety  of  shapes,  viruses consist of a nucleic acid core
surrounded by an outer  shell   (capsid)  which  consists  of
numerous  protein subunits  (capsomeres).  Some of the larger
viruses contain additional chemical  substances.   The  true
viruses  are insensitive to antibiotics.  They multiply only
in  living  cells  where  they  are  assembled  as   complex
macromolecules  utilizing  the  cells'  biochemical systems.
They  do  not  multiply  by  division  as  do  intracellular
bacteria.
                                181

-------
Volatile  Suspended Solids (VSS) .  The quantity of suspended
solids lost after the ignition of total suspended solids.

Waste Treatment Plant.  A series of tanks, screens, filters,
pumps and other equipment by which  pollutants  are  removed
from water.

Water  Quality  Criteria.   Those  specific  values of water
quality associated with an identified beneficial use of  the
water under consideration.

Weir.   A  flow  measuring  device  consisting  of a barrier
across an open channel, causing the liquid to flow over  its
crest.  The height of the liquid above the crest varies with
the volume of liquid flow.

Wet  Air  Pollution Control.  The technique of air pollution
abatement utilizing water as an absorptive media.

Wet Oxidation.  The direct oxidation of  organic  matter  in
wastewater  liquids  in  the  presence of air under heat and
pressure; generally applied to organic matter  oxidation  in
sludge.

Zeolite.   Various  natural or synthesized silicates used in
water softening and as absorbents.

Zooplankton.   (1) The animal portion of the  plankton.   (2)
Collective  term for the nonphotosynthetic organisms present
in plankton; contrasts with phytoplankton.
                              182

-------
                        SECTION XVII

                 ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS

A.C.     activated carbon
ac.ft.   acre foot
Ag.      Silver
atm      atmosphere
ave      average
bbl      barrel
BOD5     biochemical oxygen demand, five day
Btu      British thermal unit
C        centigrade degrees
C.A.     carbon adsorption
cal.     calorie
cc       cubic centimeter
cfm      cubic foot per minute
cfs      cubic foot per second
Cl.      chloride
cm       centimeter
CN       cyanide
COD      chemical oxygen demand
cone.    concentration
cu       cubic
db       decibels
deg      degree
DO       dissolved oxygen
E. Coli  Escherichia ccliform bacteria
Eq.      equation
F        Fahrenheit degrees
Fig.     figure
F/M      BOD5  (Wastewater flow) / MLSS  (contractor volume)
fpm      foot per minute
fps      foot per second
ft       foot
g        gram
gal      gallon
gpd      gallon per day
gpm      gallon per minute
Hg       Mercury
hp       horsepower
hp-hr    horsepower-hour
hr       hour
in       inch
kg       kilogram
kw       kilowatt
kwhr     kilowatthour
L(l)     liter
L/kkg    liters per 1000 kilograms
Ib       pound
                                183

-------
m        meter
M        thousand
MM       million
me       milliequivalent
mg       milligram
mgd      million gallons daily
min      minute
ml       milliliter
MLSS     mixed*? liquor suspended solids
MSVSS    mixed-liquor volatile suspended solids
mm       millimeter
mole     gram-molecular weight
mph      mile per hour
MPN      most probable number
mu       millimicron
NOJ      nitrate
NH3.-N    ammonium nitrogen
0.2       oxygen
PO*£      phosphate
p.       page
pH       potential hydrogen or hydrogen-ion index  (negative
         logrithm of the hydrogen-ion concentration)
pp.      pages
ppb      parts per billion
ppm      parts per million
psf      pound per sguare foot
psi      pound per square inch
R.O.     reverse osmosis
rpm      revolution per minute
RWL      raw waste load
sec      second
Sec.     Section
S.I.C.   Standard Industrial Classification
SOx      sulfates
sq       square
sq. ft.   square foot
SS       suspended solids
STP      standard temperature and pressure
SRWL     standard raw waste load
TDS      total dissolved solids
TKN      total kjeldahl nitrogen
TLm      median tolerance limit
TOC      total organic carbon
TOD      total oxygen demand
TSS      total suspended solids
u        micron
ug       microgram
vol      volume
wt       weight
yd       yard
                                 184

-------
                                   TABLE XVIII

                                  METRIC TABLE

                                CONVERSION TABLE
 JLTIPLY  (ENGLISH UNITS)

   ENGLISH UNIT      ABBREVIATION

 ere                     ac
 ere-feet               ac  ft
 ritish Thermal
 Unit                   BTU
 ritish Thermal
 Unit/Pound             BTU/lb
 ubic feet/minute        cfm
 ubic feet/second        cfs
 :ubic feet               cu  ft
 :ubic feet               cu  ft
 :ubic inches             cu  in
 legree Fahrenheit        °F
 "eet                     ft
gallon                   gal
;allon/minute            gpm
lorsepower               hp
 .nches                   in
 .nches of mercury        in  Hg
)ounds                   Ib
 lillion gallons/day     mgd
 lile                     mi
)ound/square
 inch (gauge)           psig
 iquare feet              sq  ft
 square inches            sq  in
 ;on  (short)              ton
                        yd
        by

    CONVERSION

      0.405
   1233.5

      0.252
           TO OBTAIN  (METRIC UNITS)

ABBREVIATION      METRIC UNIT
  ha
  cu m

  kg cal
0.555
0.028
1.7
0.028
28.32
16.39
0.555 (°F-32)*
0.3048
3.785
0.0631
0.7457
2.54
0.03342
0.454
785
1.609
kg cal/kg
cu m/min
cu m/min
cu m
1
cu cm
°C
m
1
I/sec
kw
cm
atm
kg
cu m/day
km
(0.06805 psig +1)*  atm
      0.0929        sq m
      6.452         sq cm
      0.907         kkg
      0.9144        m
hectares
cubic meters

kilogram-calories

kilogram calories/kilogram
cubic meters/minute
cubic meters/minute
cubic meters
liters
cubic centimeters
degree Centigrade
meters
liters
liters/second
killowatts
centimeters
atmospheres
kilograms
cubic meters/day
kilometer

atmospheres  (absolute)
square meters
square centimeters
metric ton  (1000 kilograms)
meter
                 *Actual  conversion,  not  a multiplier
                                             185
                                          4/30/76

-------

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Region V, Library
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois  6060U

-------