EPA-810/B-92-006
                 United States            Office of Water (WttSSO)     EPA 810-B42406
                 Environmental Protection   Office of PetUddea and      February 1992
                 Agency                Tojdc Substances (H-7501C)
                QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
                                FOR THE
     NATIONAL PESTICIDE SURVEY OF DRINKING WATER WELLS
                        ANALYTICAL METHOD 6
                                Prepared by:

                        Environmental Chemistry Section
                          Office of Pesticide Programs
                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                            NASA/SSC Bldg. 1105
                      Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000
                                Prepared for

                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                          Technical Support Division
                            Office of Drinking Water
                         26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
                            Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                                          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                          Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
                                          77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
                                          Chicago, IL  60604-3590

-------
                                                                         Section No. 1
                                                                         Revision No. 4
                                                                         Dote: December 1989
                                                                         Page 2 of 2
                                     APPROVAL PAGE
                              _,  ECS Project Leader
            Robert Maxey


            	,   EPA Technical Monitor
            Aubry E. Dupuy, Jr.     Section Chief, ECS


            	,   Acting ECS; QAC
            Danny McDaniel


            	,   NPSQAO
            Lora Johnson
            Elizabeth Leovey
  List for Distribution:

       A. Dupuy, OPP/ECS
       R. Maxey, OPP/ECS
       D. McDaniel, OPP/ECS
       L Johnson, NPS QAO
       E. Leovey, OPP/QAO
       G. Gardner, OPP/ECS
       C. Byrne, STI
       S. Mecomber, OPP/ECS
                              ,  OPPQA Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard,  12th Floor
Chicago, IL  60604-3590

-------
                                                                          Section No. 2
                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                          Date: December 1989
                                                                          Page 1 of 6
                                 NATIONAL PESTICIDE SURVEY
                           QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR
                                    ANALYTICAL METHOD 6


t;  2.    TABLE OF CONTENTS

     Section                                                  Pages    Revisions    Date

        1.   TITLE AND APPROVAL PAGE                           2         4        12/89

        2.   TABLE OF CONTENTS                                6         4        12/89

        3.   PROJECT DESCRIPTION                               1          4        12/89

        4.   PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES        2         4        12/89

        5.   QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES FOR
             MEASUREMENT DATA                                5         4        12/89
             5.1   Initial Determination of Capabilities;
                    Determination of EDLs; Determination
                    of Reporting Levels
             5.2   Determining and Reporting the Presence
                    of NPS Analytes Below the Minimal
                    Reporting Levels (MRL) and Identifying
                    Unknown Peaks
                  5.2.1  Procedure for Determining and
                           Reporting the Presence of
                           NPS Analytes Below the MRL
                  5.2.2  Procedure for Determining the
                           Identity of and Reporting
                           the Presence of Non-NPS
                           Analytes
             5.3   Laboratory QC Requirements for Primary
                    Analysis
             5.4   Laboratory QC Requirements for Secondary
                    Column Analysis
             5.5   Laboratory QC and Extract Handling Related
                    to GC/MS Confirmation
             5.6   Sample Management

        6.   SAMPLING PROCEDURES                             4         4        12/89
             6.1   Sample Requirements
             6.2   Labelling of Sample Bottles
             6.3   Field Sample Tracking Form

        7.   SAMPLE CUSTODY                                   6         4        12/89
             7.1   Tracking and Notification of Sample
                    Shipments
             7.2   Sample Requirements Following Receipt at
                    Laboratory
                  7.2.1  Storage Conditions
                  7.2.2  Holding Times
                  7.2.3  Disposal

-------
                                                                          Section No. 2
                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                          Date: December 1989
                                                                          Page 2 of 6
2.   TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

  Section                                      ,               Pages    Revisions     Date

         7.3   Return of Sample Kits to EPA Contractor
                 (ICF)
         7.4   Receipt of Extracts from Analytical Contractors
                 for GC/MS Confirmation at ECL
         7.5   Internal Practices Concerning Sample Storage

     8.   CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND FREQUENCY           6          4        12/89
         8.1    Method 6 Standards
               8.1.1   Calibration Solutions
               8.1.2  Standards Prepared at ECL
               8.1.3  QA for Diluting and Checking the
                        Standards
               8.1.4  Calibration Solutions and ECL
                        Standards Verification
               8.1.5  Frequency of Calibration Standards
                        Checks
               8.1.6  Association of Calibration Standards
                        to Survey Sample Analysis
         8.2   Calibration of Instrumentation
               8.2.1   Calibration of Gas  Chromatograph
               8.2.2  Calibration of GC/MS

     9.   ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE                               2          4        12/89
         9.1    Summary of Method
         9.2   Major Equipment/Instrumentation to Be Used With
                 Methods
         9.3   Analytical Method
               9.3.1   Method as Developed by Battelle
               9.3.2  Differences from Battelle Method
               9.3.3  Requirement for Authorization to Deviate
                        from Battelle's Method
         9.4   Sample Sets

   10.   DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION AND REPORTING         6          4        12/89
         10.1  Data Reduction
         10.2  Data Validation
         10.3  Data Reporting
         10.4  Storage of Lab. Data
         10.5  Fast-Track Reporting
         10.6  GC/MS-Data Reduction, Validation, and Reporting
               10.6.1  Data Reduction
               10.6.2  Data Validation
               10.6.3  Data Reporting
               10.6.4  Filing and Storage of GC/MS Data

   11.   INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS                   7          4        12/89
         11.1  Primary Analyses
         11.2  Confirmational (Secondary-Column) GC Analyses
               11.2.1  Criteria for Peak Gaussian Factor (PGF)
         11.3  GC/MS Confirmation

-------
                                                                       Section No. 2
                                                                       Revision No. 4
                                                                       Date: December 1989
                                                                       Page 3 of 6
2.  TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

  Section                                                   Pages    Revisions     Date

         11.4 Control Charts
              11.4.1  Establishing Control Charts
              11.4.2  Outliers
              11.4.3  Plotting Data on Control Charts
              11.4.4  Out-of-Control Situations
              11.4.5  Updating Control Charts
         11.5 Other QC Checks Performed at ECL
              11.5.1  QC Data Sheet
              11.5.2  NPS Groundwater QA Data Form
         11.6 Exceptions to the QAPjP
              11.6.1  Request for Approval
              11.6.2  Documentation and Following
                       Requirements

   12.   AUDITS                                              2         4        12/89
         12.1 Requirements
         12.2 Frequency
         12.3 Nature of Audits
              12.3.1 Tech. Systems to be Addressed
              12.3.2  Data Quality Audits
              12.3.3  Performance Evaluation Audits
         12.4 Standard
         12.5 Reporting and Use of Audit Results

   13.   PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE                         2         4        12/89
         13.1 Gas Chromatographs
         13.2 GC/MS

   14.   SPECIFIC PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING
         MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DATA                        3         4        12/89
         14.1 Formulas Related to Instrument Control
                Standards and Determination of
                Chromatographic and Column
                Performance
         14.2 Formulas for Calculating Statistics
         14.3 Formulas for Defining Control Limits

   15.   CORRECTIVE ACTION                                 1         4        12/89

   16.   QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS TO
         MANAGEMENT                                       4         4         1289

-------
                                                                      Section No. 2
                                                                      Revision No. 4
                                                                      Date:  December 1989
                                                                      Page 4 of 6
2. TABLE
Appendices
A
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
*J.
*K
OF CONTENTS (continued)
I
SAMPLE CUSTODY
BATTELLE'S VERSION OF NPS METHOD 6
DATA FLOW (REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND
REPORTING)
SIGNIFICANT FIGURES AND ROUNDING OF NUMBERS
STORAGE OF NPS HARDCOPY DATA FILES AT ECS
DIXON'S TEST
ADDITIONAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
ECS COMPUTER PROGRAMS
RAPID REPORTING NOTIFICATION
GC/MS CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR METHOD 6
ADDENDA TO METHOD 6:

3aqes
6
27
11
4
3
3
6
3
6
2


Revisions
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4


Date
12/89
12/89
12/89
12/89
12/89
12/89
12/89
12/89
12/89
12/89

      JUNE 1988 TO DECEMBER 1989
12/89
In this QAPjP Rev. 4, an asterisk in the left hand margin of the text indicates an addition or
revision to the ECS NPS QAPjP Rev. 3 of June 15,1988.  The edited text will be followed by an
effective date in parenthesis and, when applicable, a reference to the addendum in Appendix K
which addressed the change.

-------
Section No. 2
Revision No. 4
Date:  December 1989
Page 5 of 6
2. LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
ECS ANALYTICAL TEAM - METHOD 6
LABEL OF SAMPLE BOTTLES
FIELD SAMPLE TRACKING FORM
SAMPLE RECEIPT SCREENS FOR NPS LABORATORIES
TEMPERATURE MONITOR CHART EPA/ECL
NPS EXTRACT SHIPMENT
STANDARD SOLUTION DATA FORM
CALIBRATION SOLUTION RECEIVING FORM
STANDARD DILUTION FORM
FLOW CHART FOR DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION,
AND REPORTING
MASS SPEC CONFIRMATION SHEET
EXCEPTIONS TO NPS QAPjP
EQUATION USED TO CALCULATE PEAK SYMMETRY
FACTOR (PSF) AND PEAK GAUSSIAN FACTOR (PGF)
EPA REFEREE LABORATORY PROGRESS - QA REPORT
TECHNICAL MONITOR PROGRESS - QA REPORT
ANALYTICAL COORDINATOR STATUS REPORT

Figure No. £
4-1
6-1
6-2
7-1
7-2
7-3
8-1
8-2
8-3
10-1
10-2
11-3
14-1
16-1
16-2
16-3

Section
4
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
10
10
11
14
16
16
16

Page
2 of 2
3of4
4 Of 4
4of 6
5 Of 6
6 Of 6
4 Of 6
5 Of 6
6of 6
5 Of 6
6 Of 6
7of 7
3 Of 3
2 Of 4
3 Of 4
4 Of 4

-------
                                                                    Section No. 2
                                                                    Revision No. 4
                                                                    Date: December 1989
                                                                    Page 6 of 6
2.   LIST OF TABLES

Title

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SAMPLE
REQUIREMENTS
Table Mo.   Section     Page
   6-1
2 of 4

-------
                                                                             Section No. 3
                                                                             Revision No. 4
                                                                             Date:  December 1989
                                                                             Page 1 of 1
3.    PROJECT DESCRIPTION

      The National Pesticide Survey (NPS) of drinking water wells is a joint project between the EPA

Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) and Office of Drinking Water (ODW). Expectations for the full

Survey are that well-water samples will be analyzed for over 100 pesticides or degradation products

from approximately 1500 domestic and community water system wells. One compound, Ethylene

thiourea, (ETU), will be determined by NPS Method 6.

      There is a referee laboratory for each method; the OPP Environmental Chemistry Laboratory at

Bay St. Louis, MS will serve this function for NPS Method 6. The roles of the referee laboratory in this

Survey are:

      •     to analyze duplicates of samples sent to the analytical contractor (primary lab.)
           limited to 20% or a maximum of 5 samples per week from those taken the first 6
           months;

      •     to perform High Resolution GC/MS Confirmation of low concentration suspected
           residues not amenable to analysis by Low Resolution GC/MS;

      •     to provide a Technical Monitor and/or EPA Project Officer to oversee analytical
           and/or contractual aspects of work done  by the analytical contractor;

      •     to evaluate any QC activities  required of the analytical contractors, including
           conducting and participating  in NPS Audits;

      •     to provide verification analyses of blind samples;

      •     and to verify prior to use, all analytical standards prepared for use with this method
           by EPA/Technical Support Division - Cincinnati or their contractor.

-------
                                                                          Section No. 4
                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                          Date: December 1989
                                                                          Page 1 of 2
4.    PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
      Referee laboratory responsibilities for NFS Method 6 will be carried out by OPP's Environmental
Chemistry Lab. (ECS) which is managed by Dr. Aubry E. Dupuy, Jr. Section Chief. The latter will also
be Technical Monitor for Method 6. Mr. Robert Maxey, Chemist at ECS, will serve as Project Officer for
the Method. Mr. Maxey, as ECS Project Leader, will also be responsible for day-to-day management
of NPS analytical activities.  Mr. Danny McDaniel, Acting ECS-QAC, will provide QA oversight (effective
05/01/89; see Appendix K; Addendum of 05/01/89). The Sample Custodian for ECS and for the NPS
Project is Gerald Gardner.
      Dr. Christian Byrne and Mr. Stanley Mecomber will handle sample preparation, analysis,  data
handling and  reporting (effective 05/01/89; see .Appendix K; Addendum of 05/01/89).  Data review has
been assigned to Mr. Henry Shoemaker.  Data handling and reporting will be backed up by Ms. Flynt.
Mr.  Joe Ferrario will provide Low Resolution GC/MS confirmation while Mr. Danny McDaniel will handle
High Resolution GC/MS work.  Refer to the Method 6 Organization Chart, Figure 4-1, at the end of this
Section.
      Federal Express shipments of samples and of extracts for GC/MS analysis to ECS-Bay St. Louis,
MS  should be addressed to ECS' Sample Custodian:
*          U.S. EPA
           Environmental Chemistry Section
           NASA/SSC Bldg. 1105
           STENNIS SPACE CENTER, MS 39529-6000
           ATTN: Gerald Gardner
           (601) 688-3170 (or 3217)
*    The Assistant Sample Custodians for NPS are:
           Mr. John Cuevas            Mr. Stanley Mecomber
           (601) 688-3170 (or 3217)       (601) 688-3170 (or 3217)
           (effective 081288; see Appendix K; Addendum of 081288)
     The telephone number for the  EPA Technical Monitor for NPS Method 6 is:
           Dr. Aubrey E. Dupuy
           (601) 688-3212
who will also serve as the back-up contact on Method 6 for the EPA Project Officer.
     The telephone number for the EPA Project Officer for NPS Method 6 is:
           Mr. Robert Maxey
           (601) 688-1225 (or 3217)
who will also serve as the back-up contact on Method 6 for the EPA Technical Monitor.

-------
                                                              Section No. 4
                                                              Revision No. 4
                                                              Date: December 1989
                                                              Page 2 of 2
                                FIGURE 4-1
                      ECS ANALYTICAL TEAM - METHOD 6
         Sample Custodian
         G. Gardner (EPA)
        Assistant Sample
        Custodians
        J. Cuevas (EPA)
        S. Mecomber (EPA)
Sample Prep./Ext.
C. Byrne (STI)*
S. Mecomber (EPA)
                                    NPS Project Leader
                                      Bob Haxey (EPA)
                                    ECS-QAC (Acting)
                                       D.McDaniel (EPA)
                            Data Review
                         H. Shoemaker (EPA)
      GC
C. Byrne (STI)*
S. Mecomber (EPA)
                                           I
    GC/MS
J. Ferrario (EPA)
 Cata Har
 Reportir
C. Byrne
S. Mecomt
      Sverdrup Technology  Inc.  (In-house Contractor for ECS)
      ECS provides overall technical  direction to Sverdrup Technology, Inc.
      (effective 05/01/89; see  Appendix K;  Addendum of 05/01/89)

-------
                                                                            Section No. 5
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Dote:  December 1989
                                                                            Page 1 of 5
5.    QA OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENT DATA

      5.1   Initial Determination Of Capabilities; Determination Of EDLs; Determination Of
           Reporting Levels

      1.    Determine concentration of standard necessary to produce an instrument detector
           response with a 5/1 signal to noise ratio.

      2.    Spike eight reagent water samples at the concentration determined above, and analyze in
           a single analytical run.

      3.    Compute Minimum Detectable Level (MDL) by multiplying the standard deviation by the
           student's t value, appropriate for a 99% confidence level, and a standard deviation
           estimate with n-1 degrees of freedom.

      4.    The EDL equals either the concentration of analyte yielding a detector response with a 5/1
           signal to noise ratio, or the calculated MDL, whichever is greater.

      5.    Determined EDLs must be no greater than twice those determined during methods
           development.

      6.    The acceptability of EDLs exceeding the above limits will be determined  by the Technical
           Monitor, based on health effect values.

      7.    These eight EDL extracts will also  be analyzed using the confirmation column. EDLs
           determined on the confirmational column must equal those determined on the primary
           column; if not, the higher of the two EDIs will prevail to assure that there is a minimal
           response on both columns.  Again, EDLs exceeding this requirement will be approved on
           a case by case basis, by the Technical Monitors.

*     8.    To ensure adequate sensitivity the day GC/MS confirmations will be performed, a standard
           of the analyte of interest will be prepared and analyzed at approximately the analyte
           concentration that will be present when the sample extract is concentrated for GC/MS
           analysis. See Appendix J for a Table of the three ions for each analyte (effective
           06/15/88).

      9.    The Minimum  Reportable Level (MRL) for Method 6 is 3 X EDL

      10.   The lower concentration calibration standard must be prepared at a concentration equal
           to the minimum reportable level.

      5.2   Determining and Reporting the Presence of NFS Analytes Below the Minimal
           Reporting Levels and Identifying Unknown Peaks

Background Information

      The Office of Pesticide  Programs (OPP)  has requested that the NPS einalytical  contractors and

referee laboratories make an effort to report the presence of NPS analytes below the Minimal

Reporting Levels (MRL). We have also been requested to attempt to identify unknown peaks or

responses.  To assure that spurious or ambiguous data is not reported and that a uniform system or

analytical routine is used at all laboratories to accomplish these requests, the following procedures will

be used.

-------
                                                                           Section No. 5
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Date: December 1989
                                                                           Page 2 of 5
           5.2.1  Procedure for Determlnlnlng and Reporting the Presence of ETU Below the
                 Minimal Reporting Level

      1.    For Method 6, only suspected ETU peaks with responses of between one-half the
           established MRL and the MRL A/ on the primary column will be investigated.

      2. (a)  For Method 6, if the response on the second column is positive, further analytical work
           under (3) below is required.

       (b) For Method 6, if the response on the second column is negative, that fact is noted. After
           five attempts at second column confirmation have failed for ETU, the ECL Project Leader
           is informed, and discussions with OPP personnel will take place before continuation of
           analytical work on that analyte.

      3.    For responses meeting the requirements of (1) and 2(a), the laboratory will attempt LR
           GC/MS B/ confirmation if the GC/MS analyst feels it is within the capability of his
           instrument.  If the confirmation is not within the capability of the LR GC/MS, the extracts
           will be run on HR GC/MS. Copies of chromatograms, the related Method Blank, and all
           pertinent sample information must accompany the extracts. Correct volume level should
           be clearly marked on the outside of the extract tube.

      4.    Only analytes positively confirmed by GC/MS will be reported beyond the ECL Project
           Leader for Method 6 and the Analytical Coordinators.  No unconfirmed data will be
           reported outside the NPS analytical system. Unsuccessful attempts at confirmation will
           also be reported to the ECL Project Leader.

           A/=NPS Method 6    MRL = 3 X EDL

           B/=LR GC/MS = Low resolution mass spectrometry
               HR GC/MS = High resolution  mass spectrometry

      5.    Following the successful GC/MS confirmation of two such responses for ETU or two
           successive failures to  confirm the analyte without any prior successful GC/MS confirmation
           on any samples, discussions with OPP personnel will take place before continuing low-
           level analytical work on that particular analyte.

      6.    As a referee laboratory, ECL will also be receiving ETU sample extracts from the
           contractor when HR GC/MS work is required. These extract shipments will be received
           and logged in by the Sample Custodian or his Representative, and the ECL Project
           Leader will be notified.

           5.2.2  Procedure for Determining the Identity and Reporting the Presence of Non-NPS
                 Analytes

      It is expected that, over the course of the NPS Program, numerous extraneous responses will be

evident on chromatograms from the various methods. The referee laboratories will be required to

attempt identification of  peaks or responses exhibiting the minimal criteria below.

      1.    For Method 6, if the response of an extraneous peak,  exclusive of the Method Blank, on
           the primary column is greater than or equal to that of ETU at the Spiking Level (10 X MRL)
           upon initial injection, an attempt must be made to identify that peak by GC/MS. Full scan
           spectra and subsequent library search is expected and must be followed by comparison
           of the spectra of the unknown compound with that of an authentic standard of the
           suspected compound.

-------
                                                                       Section No. 5
                                                                       Revision No. 4
                                                                       Date: December 1989
                                                                       Page 3 of 5
2.    The work in (1) must be attempted on the first occurrence of such a peak and the results
      of the attempt at confirmation reported to the ECL Project Leader for Method 6. If the LR
      GC/MS analyst feels his instrument is not capable of the confirmatory work, the extract is
      submitted to the HR GC/MS analyst. Volume level of extract should be marked on the
      outside of the extract vial.

      Specific sample and analytical information must accompany each such extract.

      •     Sample i.d. number, weight of sample matrix contained in the vial copies of
           chromatograms from the primary GC column,  identification of the retention window
           for the unknown peaks as defined by the last NFS analyte to elute before the
           unknown peak. The  related Method Blank extract must also be included.

3.    Only those compounds positively confirmed by GC/MS will be reported beyond the ECL
      Project Leader for the Method, and the Analytical Coordinators. No unconfirmed data will
      be reported outside the NPS analytical system. Unsuccessful attempts at identification will
      also be reported to the Technical Monitor.

4.    Following either the successful confirmation of two such extraneous peaks proving to be
      the same compound or two failures to identify the same unknown peak, discussions with
      OFF personnel will take place before continuation with identification work on that
      particular compound.

5.3   Laboratory QC Requirements For Primary Analyses

1.    A laboratory control standard  mix, containing  ETU and the surrogate (PTU), will be
      analyzed with each set of samples.

2.    A set of samples is defined as all samples, blanks, spiked samples, etc., on which similar
      analytical operations are performed at the same time and which are analyzed  in a single
      run.

3.    The internal standard area checks detailed in Method 6, will be used but may not deviate
      by more than ± 20% of the area of the the internal standard in the nearest calibration
      standard (effective 06/88).  The control limits will be  reassessed following completion of
      the initial demonstration of capabilities.

4.    The measurement system is to be evaluated whenever any analyte is observed in a
      Method Blank, at a concentration greater than or equal to 1/2 the minimum reportable
      level. Method Blanks are to be analyzed with each set of samples.

      A sample set in which the surrogate compound recovery of the Method Blank has failed to
      meet the ± 30% criteria can be validated by use of a Field Sample, from that same
      sample set, which meets all of the quality control requirements for a Method Blank.

      Note: This is not a procedure  to validate the surrogate or the Method Blank; rather, it is a
           procedure to validate the sample set by use of a Field Sample as a Method Blank.

5.    The criteria for monitoring instrument control standards will be utilized as stated in the
      method.

6.    The requirement for surrogate recoveries from Field Samples and Method Blanks is the
      Mean Recovery, R, on the  applicable Control   Chart +. 30 percentage points  (i.e.
      R ± 30%). It is not R ± 0.30 R. (effective 081888).

-------
                                                                      Section No. 5
                                                                      Revision No. 4
                                                                      Date: December 1989
                                                                      Page 4 of 5
7.    The requirements for monitoring calibration standard responses will be followed as written
      in the method.

8.    Samples failing any QC criteria must be reanalyzed.

9.    Each time that a new calibration standard dilution is prepared, it must be compared to the
      existing calibration curve, and the observed concentration must agree within +/- 20% of
      the expected concentration.

10.   Any deviation from the analytical procedures or QC requirements, must be approved by
      the appropriate Technical Monitor, and documented in writing.

5.4   Laboratory QC Requirements For Second Column Analyses

1.    Quantitate  by comparison to a calibration standard, which is within +/- 20% of the
      concentration of the ETU determined using the primary column.

2.    The concentration for ETU on the secondary column should quantitate within +/- 25% of
      the result determined on the primary column (effective 03/20/89).

3.    If the concentration determined on the secondary column does not agree within the limits
      stated above, the analyst must confer with the Technical  Monitor concerning resolution of
      the discrepancy prior to submitting the extract for GC/MS analysis.

4.    If the concentration determined on the secondary GC column meets the criteria in (2)
      above and GC/MS is positive, report the concentration of the analyte found on the primary
      column.

5.5   Laboratory QC And Extract Handling Related To GC/MS Confirmation

1.    The sample extract is to be compared to an ETU standard prepared at the concentration
      of ETU determined from the sample extract, on either the primary or secondary column,
      whichever concentration is the lower.

2.    If additional sample extract treatment is performed for GC/MS analysis (blowdown, etc.),
      the standard  and sample extract must both undergo the same treatment.

3.    Results of the GC/MS analysis are simply reported as the presence or absence of ETU.

4.    If the low concentration of ETU in the extract precludes use of Low Resolution GC/MS,
      High Resolution GC/MS Confirmation must be attempted.  HRGC/MS may also be
      required if the ETU Concentration is greater than or equal to 1/2 its lowest adverse health
      effect or if requested by the Technical Monitor.

5.6   Sample Management

1.    Samples must arrive at the laboratory with ice still remaining in the shipping box. If a
      sample box arrives at the laboratory without any ice remaining, the Sample Custodian
      should adhere to the following instructions (effective 11/06/89).

      a.    Analyze the affected samples - you will receive payment for samples that arrive with
           melted  ice.

      b.    Take the temperature of the standing water in the bottom of the sample kit, record
           the temperature in degrees Centigrade on the sample tracking form and input the
           value into NPSIS. DO NOT TAKE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE SAMPLE IN THE
           BOTTLE

-------
                                                                      Section No. 5
                                                                      Revision No. 4
                                                                      Date: December 1989
                                                                      Page 5 of 5
     c.    Record any subjective observations you have about the samples and/
           or sample kit (i.e. the bottle was warm to the touch).

     d.    Contact your Technical Monitor if you have any further questions.
           (effective 11/06/89)

2.    Strict adherence to sample and extract maximum holding times (14 days) is required for
     both primary and secondary column analyses. All analyses should be completed as soon
     as possible, but under extenuating circumstances, the maximum extract holding time may
     be extended to 28 days for GC/MS analyses only, if approved by the Technical Monitor.

3.    Water samples are to be disposed of after the 14 day sample holding time has been
     exceeded.  Sample extracts must be maintained until disposal is; approved by the ECL
     Project Leader.

-------
                                                                           Section No. 6
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Date: December 1989
                                                                           Page 1 of 4
6.   SAMPLING PROCEDURES
     6.1   Sample Requirements
     For this method, ECL will be provided one 60-ml sample preserved with mercuric chloride at 10
mg/liter. This sample is to be shipped iced along with those needed for Methods 1 and 3, by
overnight air and is to arrive iced at ECL  This sample is for duplicate analysis of the field sample sent
to the primary analytical contractor.  No 'backup" or reserve sample will be shipped.
     ECL, as a referee laboratory, is envisioned to receive no more than 10% of the total 1500
samples now expected to be taken in the Survey. Table 6-1, found at the end of Section 6.0,
summarizes these sample requirements.
     6.2   Labelling Of Sample Bottles
     The Implementation Contractor, ICF, will supply information on the labels, sample numbering
system, and explanations for field  coding or decoding at the laboratory.  The label is shown in   .
Figure 6-1.
     6.3   Field Sample Tracking Form
     ICF will supply a copy of this form along with explanations for field coding or decoding at the
laboratory. The form is shown in Figure 6-2.

-------
                                                         Section No. 6
                                                         Revision No. 4
                                                         Date:  December 1989
                                                         Page 2 of 4
                          TABLE 6-1

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SAMPLE REQUIREMENTS
               LAB
JOT TYPE
Sasple Types
BOTTLE TYPE
HOL. KETttX
Prioary

teferee
Shipping Blank
Backup Saoplc:
Lab Spikes
Tine/Storage
"totals
lia. of Sices
TOISLRBO'D
BSL t
Referee
lOOOoL lOOCfaL 60niL
1 3 6 '


1 1 1




111
ISO 150 ISO
ISO - 150 ISO
               "total Bottles:

                      100CtaL« 300
                       2SOoL» N.A.
                        60nL« ISO

-------
                                 Section No. 6
                                 Revision No 4
                                 Date: December 1989
                                 Page 3 of 4
      FIGURE 6-1

LABEL OF SAMPLE BOTTLES
  SAMPLE #:  PD-OOOO-6-1-O1

  BSL - METHOD* 1  KIT: 611
  FIELD SAMPLE
  PRESERVATIVE:  HgC12
   DATE   ',   TIME   5 SAMPLER
   NATIONAL PESTICIDE SURVEY

   SAMPLE #:  PD-OOOO-6-3-01- -
   BSL - METHOD* 3 - \ IT: £
   FIELD SAMPLE
   PRESERVATIVE:  H=C12
    DATE   '.   TIME   '. SAMPLER
    NATIONAL PESTICIDE SURVEY

    SAMPLE #:  PD-0000-6-6-01

    BSL - METHOD** 6  KIT: 611
    FIELD SAMPLE
    PRESERVATIVE:  HgC12
     DATE   !   TIME   ', SAMPLER
     NfiTJONrW _££5JJ -PJ SS SURVEY

        i'-LE «:  PC-- •• .-.•-3-i--vr.:
     BSL - METHOD* 1  KIT: 611
     BACKUP  SAMPLE
     PREBERVAT I V£ :  HgC 1 2
      DATE   !   T I !1g   \ SAMPLER

-------
                                                                                          Section No. 6
                                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                                          Date:  December 1989
                                                                                          Page 4 of 4
                                                 FIGURE 6-2

                                      FIELD SAMPLE TRACKING FORM
WELL I.D. NO.:   0000

FRDS I.D. No.  (CHS HELL  ONLY):

SAMPLE  COLLECTION DATE:  	/

TRACKING FORM COMPLETED  BY:
     LAB: SSL
SCE.1AR10: _l
EOi  1  o:   1
                                                    TO BE  CCHPLETED B*:
ICF
SAMPLE
NUMBER
F3-0000-6-1-01
FD-uOOO-6-3-01
PD-OOOO-fe-e-01
PE-0'JOO-6-i-03
1

BOTTLE
SIZE
1000
1000
aO
10CO

SAMPLE
DESCRIPTION
FIELD SAMPLE
FIELD SAMPLE
FIELD SAMPLE
BACKUP SAMPLE
FIELD TEAM
SAMPLER
'INITIAL)




i
TIRE 1 COMMENTS ill .RECEIVES; COMMENTS
SAMPLES . ;
: ; : T :;;
i
: I Ni
: . : , ft:
: • N;
 CHLORINE   TEST:
   SHIPPED BY:
    . RECEIVE:- AT LAB BY:
! SATE TIME
; SENT TO:
J
J
i

; :-ATE
LAB ADDRESS: lihiJITIiX i3
BAY St. LCjIS tsfi'E«Mt3H»EJ»TAl.
CHEMISTS .Ai. :.;£. ll.S :
.
NSTL. P.S -3;5:<
.
TIRE
:




 ,  ,li FDS EiAMPLE:  SOTT.E BROKEK, 5CTTLE BiSSl.lS, CVERFL.E5  -CTTu. f.t» MS :S5?FEB
 :  12) F3R EiiiMPLE:  BOTTLE BSOfcES, BOTTLE HISSING, SETTLE ICfcTiMMTES. TEflfiEfiATUftE CRITERIA KCT ".E7
 I  Ci FM ElAflPLE:  III MELTED, BOi LEAKING
 :      i  lid coaunts should  concur with NPSIS SAMFLE RECEIPT i

-------
                                                                          Section No. 7
                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                          Date: December 1989
                                                                          Page 1 of 6
7.   SAMPLE CUSTODY
     7.1   Tracking And Notification Of Sample Shipments
     The proposed EPA system for notification of the laboratory of sample shipments and for
notification of the Implementation Contractor (ICF) of receipt of the samples is delineated on the flow
chart and diagram, Labelled Figure 7-1, 'SAMPLE RECEIPT SCREENS FOR NPS LABORATORIES' at
the end of Section 7.0. This system will be computerized.
     7.2  Sample Requirements Following Receipt At Laboratory
     Tracking of all samples arriving at the laboratory will begin upon receipt of any sample and will
continue through each phase of the analysis.
     •     Upon receipt of samples, each is identified according to its 'Field Sample Number",
           logged in and stored at 4°C. This information is documented on a 'NPS LOGGING
           FORM'.
     •     The Sample Custodian or his/her Representative will compile 'sets' of samples for
           Method 6 comprised of 8 samples and appropriate controls as covered in Section
           9.4 of this QAPjP. The composition of each set is documented on a "SET
           COMPOSITION FORM.'
     •     Transfer of samples into and out of storage will be documented on an internal
           chain-of-custody record. Only those  samples in the 'set1 on which analytical work
           will be done will be removed. This information is documented on  a 'SAMPLE
           CONTROL RECORD FORM'. The analyst will sign and date this Record when
           removing or returning samples to storage.
     •     After removal from storage, samples are tracked through extraction and G.C.
           Analysis via an  'ECL/NPS SAMPLE TRACKING FORM'.
     •     Following extraction, sample extracts are stored in a refrigerator at 4°C until
           analyses are complete. Following analysis, they are transferred to screw-cap tubes
           (teflon liners), the extract level marked, and stored by set in a freezer at Qo to -20oC.
           An 'E)CrRACT STORAGE DATA SHEET* records chain-of-custody of extracts from
           GC Analysis to GC/MS Confirmation,  if required, and to disposal.
     •     Copies of all the above mentioned Forms and Records can be found in Appendix A
           7.2.1  Storage Conditions
     Upon receipt at the laboratory, samples win be stored under refrigeration at 4°C and protected
from light
           7.2.2  Holding Times
     Samples have a maximum holding time of 14 days from time of collection until the start of
extraction.
     Extracts have a maximum holding time of 14 days from date of extraction to GC Analysis and
GC/MS Confirmation, if required. The holding time for GC/MS Analysis may be extended an additional
14 days upon approval of the ECL Project Leader.

-------
                                                                           Section No. 7
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Date: December 1989
                                                                           Page 2 of 6
           7.2.3  Disposal

     Samples held longer than 14 days without being extracted are to be disposed of after approval
is given by the ECL Project Leader.

     The samples arrive with a 10 mg/liter concentration of mercuric chloride which Is added as a

preservative.  Disposal of these samples will be to an EPA-approved water treatment system capable

of handling these concentrations of mercuric chloride and which is connected to the ECL facility.
     The sample extracts will be disposed of as hazardous waste by an EPA-approved hazardous
waste disposal firm or contractor at an EPAapproved dispsosal site.

     7.3   Return Of Sample Kits To EPA Contractor (ICF)
     ICF is to provide information on this.

*    7.4   Receipt and Tracking of Extracts from Analytical Contractors for GC/MS Confirmations
           at ECS (effective 06/05/89)

     To carry out its responsibilities as a referee lab., (see Section 3), ECS will be receiving from
Analytical Contractors sample extracts meeting the requirements of Section 5.2.  For all such extracts
arriving at ECL, tracking will begin upon receipt and continue through final disposition according to

the following procedure.
     •     Upon receipt at ECS, the Sample Custodian or his representative will check extracts
           against the NFS EXTRACT SHIPMENT form, filling in the Date Received at ECS,
           Condition of Shipment, Number of Refrigerator where stored, the Container Number,
           and signing where appropriate.  (A copy of this form is attached at the end of this
           Section and is labeled Figure 7-2.) He should jthen  place the extracts in containers
           labeled by date and store in a refrigerator at 4°C.

     •     The Sample Custodian will make necessary copies of paperwork received with the
           extract shipment giving all the original paperwork to the NFS Technical Monitor for
           the Analytical Contractor and a copy of the original paperwork to the GCMS Analyst.
           The Sample Custodian should keep on file, in the receiving room, a copy of the
           NFS EXTRACT SHIPMENT form.

     •     The GCMS analyst should remove extracts from the designated refrigerator, analyze
           the extracts by GCMS, then complete the remainder of the NFS Extract Shipment
           form and the GCMS Data Sheets.  The analyst should give all completed forms and
           GCMS spectra to the Technical Monitor.

     •     The Technical Monitor will use the information from the NFS EXTRACT SHIPMENT
           form to complete an overall tracking form, the NFS GCMS EXTRACT TRACKING
           FORM. He will send a copy of the GCMS Data Sheet to the NFS Data Manager and
           to the Analytical Contractor. He will also send the Analytical Contractor a copy of
           the GCMS spectra.  ECS will maintain the original paperwork on file.

     •     GC/MS results will be reported as in Sections 10.5 and/or 10.63.

     •     The Technical Monitor for the appropriate Method will receive all results and reports
           of GC/MS confirmation analyses and a monthly report from the ECL Sample
           Custodian on the total number of extracts received for each Method.

-------
                                                                             Section No. 7
                                                                             Revision No. 4
                                                                             Date: December 1989
                                                                             Page 3 of 6
      •     The Technical Monitor will inform the Analytical Contractor, in writing, of the results
           of each GC/MS confirmation attempt.
      •     Disposal of extracts will be according to Section 7.23 and will be authorized by the
           Technical Monitor.
      7.5   Internal Practices Concerning Sample Storage
      The temperatures of coolers, refrigerators, and freezers where samples and/or extracts are
stored are monitored each working day and this activity and the temperature are recorded in a log
book maintained for this purpose. A copy  of this record is included as Figure 7-3 at the end of this
Section.
      The ECS Sample Custodian, Gerald Gardner, or the Assistant Sample Custodians are
responsible for monitoring these storage areas (effective 081299; see Appendix K; Addendum of
081288). ECS has an agreement with the facility contractor to provide weekly preventive maintenance
and emergency repair services on large coolers where samples will be stored.

-------
                                                   Section No. 7
                                                   Revision No. 4
                                                   Date: December 1989
                                                   Page 4 of 6
                   FIGURE 7-1
SAMPLE RECEIPT SCREENS FOR NPS LABORATORIES
                                                        I ill 11    |
                                    C O OOO
                                    — Q. Q. ift. O.  =

-------
                                                                          Section No. 7
                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                          Date: December 1989
                                                                          Page 5 of 6
                                         FIGURE 7-2
                                  NPS EXTRACT SHIPMENT
£
fr>4
X

-------
                                                               Section No. 7
                                                               Revision No. 4
                                                               Date: December 1989
                                                               Page 6 of 6
                                    FIGURE 7-3
                       TEMPERATURE MONITOR CHART EPA/ECL
* WALK-IN
COOLERS/BLDG.  1105
» WALK-IN/UPRIGHT
FREEZERS/BLDG. 2204/110!
REMARKS
                  PERSON CHECKING
                 PERSON CHECKING

-------
                                                                            Section No. 8
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Date: December 1989
                                                                            Page 1 of 6
8.    CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND FREQUENCY
      8.1   Method 6 Standards
           8.1.1   Calibration Solutions
      Calibration solutions will be provided and sent to both the referee lab (ECL) and primary
analytical contractor by EPA/TSD-Cincinnati through their contractor Bionetics.  The solutions are to
be in flamesealed glass ampules. These solutions will be sent iced by next-day air to ECL and will be
accompanied by a 'STANDARD SOLUTION DATA FORM*. The ECL Sample Custodian or other
Designated Representative will receive these standards shipments, note whether or not they were iced
and date of receipt, and relinquish custody of the standards to a member of the Method 6 analytical
team. A sample copy of this form is attached at the end of this Section and is labeled Figure 8-1.
      A 'CALIBRATION SOLUTION RECEIVING FORM1 will be initiated to record the date solutions are
received, number of sets,  condition, and place of storage at ECL  These forms will be kept in a
designated folder.  A copy is found at the end of this Section and labeled Figure 8-2.
           8.1.2  Standards Prepared at ECL
      ECL will prepare and maintain separately weighed stock standards of each anatyte.  These
stock standard materials should be from the same lot numbers as those used to prepare the
EPA/Bionetics-supplied calibration solutions. These ECL-prepared standards will be used to verify the
concentrations of the calibration solutions and resolve problems or questions that may arise
concerning any of the standards.
      A standards log book is maintained to record name of person weighing the standard, chemical
name of standard, date of preparation, purity, lot no., source, balance calibration data, and standard
weighing data.
           8.1.3  QA for Diluting and Checking the Standards
      Prior to dilution, calibration solutions and/or EPA/ECL stock standards are removed from freezer
storage and allowed to reach room temperature.
      Calibration solutions and all subsequent dilutions are labeled with the standard identifier, Batch
No., solvent, preparer, date and concentration. The Batch Nos. provide a means of tracking them to
origin. The EPA/ECL prepared standards are labeled with standard identifier, date standard was
weighed, solvent, preparer, and concentration. These standards can be tracked to origin by the date
the standard was weighed which will lead to a specific entry in the ECL standards log book as
covered in 8.12.
      A 'STANDARD DILUTION FORM',(Figure 8-3) at the end of this Section, is used to record all
information on dilutions and to facilitate the tracking of standards.
          8.1.4  Calibration Solutions and ECL Standards Verification
      Calibration solutions will be the stock material for all standards used in the NPS at both the
referee and analytical contractor laboratories.  To verify their concentrations, they must by analyzed

-------
                                                                             Section No. 8
                                                                             Revision No. 4
                                                                             Date: December 1989
                                                                             Page 2 of 6
against the ECL prepared standards before use. The calibration solutions and ECL prepared
standards must differ by no more than ± 15%.  Following the comparison, all values must be reported
to the ECL Project Leader. Standards with differences >+. 15% require resolution at this point before
work with the standard can proceed.
           8.1.5  Frequency of Calibration Standards Checks
      Calibration standards must be checked against ECL prepared standards each time a new
calibration standard is prepared from a calibration solution. Criteria in 8.14 apply.
      Concentrations of calibration solutions must be verified at ECL each time new Batch Nos. are
prepared at EPA/TSD-Cincinnati or Bionetics and before shipment to the analytical contractor.  Criteria
in 8.14 apply.
           8.1.6  Association of Calibration Standards to Survey Sample Analyses
      Each calibration (bench) standard  used in analytical determinations must be able to be traced
to its origin, and every field sample or control sample analyzed must be associated with the specific
calibration standard(s) used.
     To facilitate these requirements, each standard mix with different components or different
concentrations of these components must have a uniquely different name and a date of preparation.
This standard  identifier and date must appear on each chromatogram of the standard.  It may also
appear on the computerized  data printout.
     8.2  Calibration of Instrumentation
           8.2.1  Calibration of Gas Chromatograph
     A Hewlett-Packard 5890 A dual capillary GC with Nitrogen-Phosphorus Detectors (NPDs) will be
used to analyze  Method 6 samples.  The internal standard technique below will be used.
     The internal standard (IS) selected for use with Method 6 is 2,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2-pyrimidinethiol,
and it is compatible with the  GC columns and chromatographic conditions for this method.
     A minimum of three calibration standards will be used with each calibration standards mix, and
the lowest concentratbn of each must be at the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL). The higher
concentrations will span the range of concentrations expected in the sample extracts and in the
Laboratory Control Spikes (LCS).
      Following injection of the calibration standards, the relative response (RRJ of each analyte to
the IS is  calculated with the following equation:
                 RRa = Aa / Aj, , where
                      Aa = Area of the analyte
                      AJ, = Area of the interred standard
     The calibration curve is generated  by plotting RRa vs. analyte concentration in ug/liter.
      The working calibration curve must be verified each day or each working shift.  If the response
for any analyte varies from the predicted response by more than ± 20%, the test must be repeated

-------
                                                                            Section No. 8
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Date: December 1989
                                                                            Page 3 of 6
using a freshly prepared calibration standard. Alternatively, a new calibration curve must be prepared
for that analyte if, in using the freshly prepared calibration standard, the predicted response for the
anafyte continues to vary by more than ± 20%.
      If a new calibration curve must be prepared, the ECL Project Leader must be informed.
           8.2.2   Calibration of HR GC/MS
      Scanning Mode   -    The instrument is calibrated by the MCAL and CALJB routines in the
                           MAT 312 oprations manual
      MID Mode       -    The instrument must be further calibrated by using ESCAW and ECAL
                           routines in the manual
      The instrument will be tuned  for proper relative ion intensities by using DFTPP1  (if possible)
when library searches are indicated.
   1 Eichelburger, J.W.; Harris, L.E.; Budde, W.L  'Reference Compound to Calibrate Ion Abundance
Measurements in Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry Systems' Anal. Chem. 1975,47(7), 995-1000.

-------
                                              Section No. 8
                                              Revision No. 4
                                              Date:  December 1989
                                              Page 4 of 6
            FIGURE 8-1
, STANDARD SOLUTION DATA FORM
         CO
          o
         to
         to
       •  d.
                II—  ^
                • <: i^l
                :=!. i   i
             !°;?1 i°i
              I  M  3
              |  ||i  JS!
                io:  1"^.
              i-iic.;
              JS;—.  IOI
              :-«
il2!  II
                    ;O:
                     fc!
                 V)


-------
                                                         Section No. 8
                                                         Revision No 4
                                                         Date: December 19B9
                                                         Page 5 of 6
                           FIGURE 8-2

              CALIBRATION SOLUTION RECEIVING FORM
Date Received:	°*te Checked:.
Person Receiving	Person Checking:.
Mare Samples Iced?J_^	Relinquished Custody: (Yes/No)

Method No:  (1,3,or 6)		.	
            (circle one)
Contents:
 Person Assuming  Custody:	.	_	Date:.

 Number of Sets:		•—
  Date Calibration Solutions arrived at EPA/ECL written
  on individual standard cartons: (Yes/No)	
  Date Stored:	Freezer No:	Room No:

  Contents on condition of Calibration Solutions:

-------
                                                                             Section No. 8

                                                                             Revision No. 4

                                                                             Date: December 1989

                                                                             Page 6 of 6
                                          FIGURE 8-3

                                  STANDARD DILUTION FORM
  0
  b
  e
  c
  ea
o
h.


O
 V)

-------
                                                                           Section No. 9
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Dote: December 1989
                                                                           Page 1 of 2
9.   ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
     9.1   Summary Of Method
     This Method is applicable to the determination of ethylene thiourea (ETU) in ground water.
     The ionic strength and pH of a measured 50 ml volume of sample are adjusted by addition of
ammonium chloride and potassium flouride. The sample is poured onto an Extrelut\ column.  ETU is
eluted from the column in 400 ml of methylene chloride. The extract is solvent exchanged to ethyl
acetate and concentrated to a volume of 5 ml.
     Capillary gas-chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detectors is used for both primary and
secondary analyses of the sample extracts.
     For sample extracts with suspected-positive ETU residues, (i.e.those with positive responses on
both the primary and secondary GC columns), such extracts will be analyzed by either Low Resolution
GC/MS (LRGC/MS) or High Resolution GC/MS (HRGC/MS) to confirm the presence or absence of
ETU.
     9.2   Major Equipment/Instrumentation To Be Used With Method 6
     •     Hewlett-Packard 5890A dual capillary gas chromatograph with dual nitrogen-
           phosphorus detectors.  Similar GC for backup.
     •     Hewlett-Packard 7673A autosampler.  Identical autosampler for backup.
     •     Hewlett-Packard 3359A data system.
           Finnigan MAT 312 High Resolution GC/MS
     •     Finnigan MAT 5100 Low Resolution GC/MS
     9.3   Analytical Method
           9.3.1  Method As Developed By Battelle
     This Method is presented in Appendix B.
           9.3.2  Differences  From Battelle Method
*    4.1.1       Follow by washing with tap water... Thorough rinsing with acetone, methylene
                chloride, and  hexane following oven heating.
*    6.1.1       120 ml bottles
*    6.1.1       caps with PTFE-liners
*    6.2.4      Glass, 1 to 1.5 ml capacity with TFE septa
*    6.3        Hengar granules, amphoteric alurdum granules (Henry Troemner)
     Denotes reference to Battelle's Method and is not part of the ECL numbering system.

-------
                                                                            Section No. 9
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Dote:  December 1989
                                                                            Page 2 of 2
      6.7        Hewlett Packard Gas Chromatograph 5890 (2643A10048) with Autoinjector 7673A
                (2730A09113) with Omniscribe recorder (Model D5118-1; 134310-10070) utilizing an
                A/D 18652A convenor (2135A12210) and a 3359A Laboratory Automation System
                (2219A11648).

      6.7.1       Primary column -15m long X 0.25 mm	

      6.7.2       Confirmation column - 30 m long X 0.25 mm I.D. SPB-35	

      7.1        Reagent water - Reagent water was prepared by passing tap water through a
                Millipore - MILLIR04/MILUQ water purification system (Resistance => 10
                megaohms/cm

                The propylene thiourea was prepared and supplied by Battelle-Columbus.

                Instrument QC Standard -	25 ul of the ETU stock standard solution	

                Select a representative spike concentration (suggest 10 times the MRL)	

                    .falls between 80 and  120 percent.

                    is less than 80 or greater than 120 percent,....  (3) If the reanalysis fails the 80
                to 120 percent recovery....
*
*
*
*
*
7.9
7.1.4
10.2.1
10.4.2
10.4.3
The
Instn
Sele


     10.4.4
     10.6.1.1
     11.1.1
     TABLE 1
When the surrogate recovery for a sample is less than 80 per
or greater than 120 percent	
cent
The spiking concentration in the laboratory control standard should be 10 times the
MRL	

Add preservative to all Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Standards, and any
Samples not previously preserved (Section 8.2). Pipet 50 ml	

Primary conditions - Column: 15 m long	  Confirmation conditions - Column: 30 m
long X 0.25 mm I.D.  SPB-35	
*    TABLES   Sensitivity   Ethylene thiourea (ETU)  0.025 ug/ml

           9.3.3  Requirement For Authorization To Deviate From Battelle's Method

     Any differences from the Method in Section 9.31 must be discussed with and approved by the

ECL Project Leader for this Survey. The ECL Project Leader may require that such requests be in

writing and be supported by a rationale, facts, or laboratory data

     9.4   Sample Sets

     Samples will be carried through the analytical work in discrete groups or 'sets'. A set is a

collection of field samples and QC checks or controls sufficient to assess the quality and validity of

any data generated from the set independently of any other set. Specific controls included in  sets with

this Method are a Method Blank and a Laboratory Control Spike. At a maximum, 8 Field Samples may

be run in a set.

-------
                                                                          Section No. 10
                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                          Date: December 1989
                                                                          Page 1 of 6
10.   DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING
      10.1  Data Reduction
      ECS will use an H-P 3359A Data System to acquire, store, and analyze raw data from the
instrument and to generate data reports associated with each analysis. Information generated are
compound retention times, peak areas, relative response factors, and anatyte concentrations. These
values plus sample i.d. and instrument parameters will comprise a DATA REPORT. Concurrent with
sample analyses, hardcopy chromatograms will be generated and along with the DATA REPORTS will
form a HARDCOPY DATA FILE.  (Refer to Figure 10-1 at the end of this Section.)
      Each sample chromatogram will be labelled with the Field Sample Number, final volume of
extract, ul injected, dilution information if applicable, mg * e.q. of sample, date, and initials of analyst.
      Each chromatogram of a standard must be labelled with the unique identifier of the bench or
calibration standard, amount injected, date of preparation of the standard, date of analysis, and initials
of the analyst.
      10.2  Data Validation
      Information from each DATA REPORT will be evaluated and verified by an analyst experienced
in chromatography and with this Method. Evaluation will include all QC CHECKS against
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA as specified in Section 11.0 and the DATA MEASUREMENT requirements for
analyses as specified  in Section 5.0.
     Additionally, the following sampling and tracking data will be evaluated:
      •     Is the date from sampling to receipt at ECL within the NPS requirements? (1 day)
      •     Is the date from sampling to extraction within the NPS requirements? (14 days)
      •     Is the date from extraction to analysis, including GC/MS confirmation, within NPS
           requirements? (14 days)
      SAMPLE DATA REPORTS on all samples and controls within the set will be prepared along with
QC SUMMARIES of all QC DATA from the set. For those sample extracts that must be referred to
GC/MS CONFIRMATION SHEEP which conveys to the GC/MS operator information on the extract
necessary for the confirmation work. See Figure 10-2 at the end of this Section.
     All data generated under 10.1 and 10.2 will be PEER REVIEWED by an analyst under the
direction of the ECL Quality Assurance Coordinator (QAC) or his Designated Representative. This
review will include review of the HARDCOPY DATA FILE for the sample set and validation of  all sample
data and QC checks from which SAMPLE DATA REPORTS and QC SUMMARIES are derived.
Discrepancies will be resolved by the ECL QAC, Project Leader, and the analyst. Upon completion of
all reviews, the PEER REVIEWER will sign and date all forms and records indicating validation of the
data.

-------
                                                                           Section No. 10
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Date: December 1988
                                                                           Page 2 of 6
      10.3 Data Reporting
      Analytical sample data and QC data from the Instrument Control Standard (see Section 11.1)
will be reported via an ASCII text file on a floppy diskette. (See Appendix C for instructions on the data
format and specific data to be keyed into the ASCII files.) The data in the SAMPLE DATA REPORTS
and QC SUMMARIES will contain any data to be entered into the ASCII file.
      A d-Base III program has been written to generate and manage these ASCII files.
      Sampling data and tracking data will be entered into the files by the ECL Sample Custodian
and/or analytical team members who are completing analytical work with time limits (i.e. sample or
extract holding times).
      The floppy diskettes containing these files will be sent each month to EPA/Cincinnati, Ohio to:
                      Christopher Frebis
                      EPA/Technical Support Division
                      26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
                      Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
      Data for a set of samples are to be reported no later than 2 months from the earliest sample
collection date within that set.
      Where rounding-of-numbers or determination of significant digits is required, ECL will adhere to
the procedures and criteria in Appendix D.
      10.4 Storage of Lab. Data
      The HARDCOPY DATA FILE (chromatograms of samples, controls, associated standards and
the related DATA REPORTS or computerized printouts) will be maintained and filed by Method and
set. The data file on a set will also contain all forms used in evaluating  samples and QC checks
related to the set and the SAMPLE DATA FORMS and QC SUMMARIES. Sampling and tracking data
will also be filed.
      It is the responsibility of the analyst to assure that all elements of  the HARDCOPY DATA FILE
are in the file.  It is the responsibility of the PEER REVIEWER to see that these same elements remain
intact following review and that they are stored by Method and by Set in the RECORDS ROOM.
      These files will be retained in storage until ECL is notified by NPS Management of further
disposition.
      Raw data is acquired and stored on hard-disk and can be retrieved if necessary.  There is no
provision for back-up magnetic tape storage. The HARDCOPY DATA FILE will contain all elements
needed to support a sample analysis. The Procedure for storage of NPS files is attached as Appendix
E.
      10.5 Fast-Track Reporting
      The NPS has determined that two situations will require 'FastTrack Reporting' of data
      •    Confirmed positive residues for certain analytes to be specified by EPA. This data
           will also be reported routinely with the appropriate set data.

-------
                                                                            Section No. 10
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Date: DecembeM989
                                                                            Page 3 of 6
      •     A situation when results from the secondary QC column do not agree with results
           from the primary column within criteria set forth in Section 5.4. This situation is to be
           discussed with the ECL Project Leader prior to reporting the data
      A protocol has been provided by NFS  on reporting the "confirmed positives' mentioned above.
See Appendix I for the NFS protocol and the list of analytes and their rapid reporting levels. The ECL
Project Leader will assume the duties and responsibilities assigned to the Technical Monitor in  the
memo.
      Also included  in the Appendix are forms to be used at ECL in reporting analytes subject  to rapid
reporting requirements. Form for all three Methods being run at ECL are included with this QAPjP
since an action level in one Method triggers  rapid reporting for aN Methods.
      It is  the responsibility of the GC analyst for this Method to be aware of these rapid reporting
levels, to assure that the ECL report forms are initiated upon determining that a particular residue
associated with his/her Method is subject to  rapid reporting, and to inform the ECL Project Leader
immediately.
      10.6 GC/MS
           10.6.1   Data Reduction
      All HR GC/MS data are acquired by a Digital PDP 11/34 computer and stored on a CDC-CMD
disc drive. The LR GC/MS data are acquired by a Finnigan 5100 data system based on Supertncos
software.  The data is initially manipulated by computerized routines.  Identification is based on the
mass spectra and retention time of the analyte of interest (ETU). The GC/MS computer software will
search for ETU at the proper retention time and also look for characteristic ions. The ETU peak area in
the sample being confirmed and the area generated from a standard of ETU at about the same
concentration level are compared.  Hard copies of data are made and kept on file. After all the results
have been received, the raw data is transferred to a magnetic tape for storage.
           10.6.2   Data Validation
      The  hard copies of the MS data are reviewed by the mass spectroscopist for accuracy and
completeness. The  data must also meet the other QA requirements in this QAPjP [See Section 5.1(8),
5.21, 5.22, 5.5, 5.6(2)], that apply.  Then the  Section Chief or the NFS Project Leader reviews the data,
and a decision is made whether or not the presence of a compound can be confirmed.
           10.6.3   Data Reporting
      The  results of  the GC/MS confirmatory analyses will be reported to the ECL Project Leader if the
sample(s)  were extracted at ECL and to the appropriate Technical Monitor for the Analytical Contractor
if the extractions were done by the contractor. (See Figure 10-2 at the end of this section.) One set of
hardcopy data supporting each confirmation should be attached to the form.
           10.6.4   Filing and Storage of GC/MS Data
      The  ECL Project Leader will be responsible for the initial filing and  storage of GC/MS results and
data as described in Section 10.4.

-------
                                                                        Section No. 10
                                                                        Revision No. 4
                                                                        Date: December 1989
                                                                        Page 4 of 6
     Raw data will be stored on magnetic tape by the GC/MS analyst as described in Section 10.61.

Any GC/MS analysis or confirmation can be reconstructed from this raw data

                     STORAGE OF NPS HARDCOPY DATA FILES AT ECL

          The HARDCOPY DATA FILES and all related reports will be filed according to NPS
     Method No., and then by Sample Set.

          ECL has a RECORDS ROOM available for this purpose.  It is equipped with shelving
     for storage, a smoke alarm, and a sprinkler system. Activation of the smoke alarm is
     monitored 24 hours a day by the NSTL fire department which can respond within 2
     minutes to an alarm. ECL will take precautions to protect from sprinkler system water
     damage all files stored in this room.

          The RECORDS ROOM is also the office of the ECL QAC and is locked when the
     room is unoccupied. Access is limited to the ECL Laboratory Manager, the ECL QAC,
     and Project/Team Leaders.

          The STORED RECORDS LOG is used to log files into the RECORDS ROOM and to
     record removal and subsequent return of these files.

-------
                                                          Section No. 10
                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                          Date:  December 1989
                                                          Page 5 of 6
                            FIGURE 10-1

     FLOW CHART FOR DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING
    (7)
  Sampling/
Tracking Data
                        (1)
       Instrument
        Response
                         (3)
      Disk Storage
                   (4)
  Analysis  of  Raw  Data
     By  Data System
t fhrftmat
(Hardc


)ata
n

ogram
.opy)

                  (2)
                   (5)
  Data Report (Printout)
     Hard  Copy
     Data  File
(6)
Evaluation of Sample Data;
  Evaluation of QC Checks
Against Acceptance Criteria
(8)
                            Sample Data Reports
                           QC Summaries (by Set)
                           (9)
                               |  Peer Review |  (10)
                                Data Packets
                                (ASCII Cards)
                         (11)
                               Monthly Reports [  (12)

-------
                                                      Section No. 10
                                                      Revision No. 4
                                                      Date: December 1989
                                                      Page 6 of 6
                            FIGURE 10-2

                    MASS SPEC CONFIRMATION SHEET
                    Specific details of  sample extract*


Sample No.	  SaroP1<( C°nC g/ml-
   Compound  Cone   Ma« Spec  Ka«. Spec    Ha«e Spec   Ma.. Spec
             NO/«1  Hinber     Conftrwa-    ««t Cone.   Confirmation
                                                        coae
                               tion
1.
2.
3.
Sample No.	-	  SanlPle C°nC

   Compound  Cone   Mass Spec  Mass Spec    Mass Spec
                    Number     Confiraa-    est. Cone
                               tion
1.
2 .
3 .
4 .
 Saiaple No.
                                             Mass  Spee
                                             est.  Cone
                                tion
 Sample Mo.ConC 0/"1'
    Co.poun.  cj-   H^rc   H..-              Spec

                                 (ion

-------
                                                                            Section No. 11
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Date: December 1989
                                                                            Page 1 of 7
11.  INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
     Summarized in this Section are all the QC checks and controls required for analysis of NFS
samples. These QC checks are classified according to the analysis type (i.e.- primary column,
secondary column, GC/MS Confirmation).
     11.1  Primary Analyses
Type of QC Cheek
• Instrument Control—
Standard
PSF
PQF
Sensitivity







• Field Samples
- Internal Standard
- Surrogate Spike
• Performance Eval.
Sam pie*
• Shipping Blank
it_-J


• Time Storage Sample*
Frequency
1 day (or I tet If
uninterrupted
analytic of the est
extends to 2 days)






working ihHt
Maximum 8 eet
Each sample
Each »am pie
As needed





Criteria for Acceptance
0.95 < PSF < 1.05
Refer to Section 11. 21 -Criteria for
Peak Gaussian Factor (PQF) (effective
07/1 1/80; see Appendix K; Addendum
07/11/80)
£EDLforETU
No peaks wtthln the retention window

anaryte.
Rotor to Section 11 4.3


thai predicted by current calibration
curve
Response must be within +. 20% of
In calibration stds.
Recovery must fall within window of R
(recovery of surrogate from applicable
control chart) + 30 percentage points
(effective 08/18/80).
To be determined
NOT APPLICABLE TO ECLREFI



NOT APPLICABLE TO EOL REFI
Corrective Action
Raevaluatlon of QC System
Heevaluaoon of QC system
Reevaluatton of QC System




control Is establlhsed. Refer to Section 11.4.3.

2. Prepare a new calibration curve
See Individual QC checks.
Reft to Appendix _C_, Section 10.5, In the written method.
1. Check calculations.
2. Check internal and surrogate std. spiking solutions.
3. Reanalyze the sample extract
4. If reanarysts of extract remits In surrogate being 1n-
oontrol,' submit only data from IrMWitroT analysis.
5. freanarysls Mis to put surrogate In control,
reewaluate analytical method and measurement
system. Reextrejct failed sample when system is
again in control.
Out-of-contrel situation; problem must be corrected and
analytical system put beck In control as evldneced by
successfully analyzing a second P-E Sample.
EREE RESPONSIBILITIES



EREE RESPONSIBILITIES
     I/  Refer to Section 14.1 and to Appendix _C_, Table Son page 24 of the written Method.

-------
                                                                            Section No. 11
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Dele:  December 1989
                                                                            Page 2 of 7
    11.2  Conflrmatlonal (Secondary-Column) GC Analyses
Type of QC Check
• Calibration Standards
• Instrument Control
Standard
Sensitivity
• Method Blank
• Shipping Blank
• Quantitation
- Calibration Std.
- Analyte Concentration
Value
Frequency
min. 1 day or
each working
shift
1 day
1 set
Criteria for Acceptance
All analyte responses within +
20% of that predicted by current
calibration curve.
> EDLforETU
No peak within retention window
of any analyte >. V4 MRL for that
analyte
Corrective Action
1 . Prepare a fresh calibration
standard, or
2. Establish a new calibration
curve
Revaluation of GC System
Out-of-control situation; Method
Blank must be brought back in
control before proceeding.
NOT APPLICABLE TO ECL REFEREE RESPONSIBILITIES
As required by
suspect
positives from
primary column
Per analyte
_+ 20% of cone, of the analyte
determined on the primary
column
± 25% of the cone, determined
on the primary column
Use proper std. cone.
Confer with ECL Project Leader.
I/ Refer to Section 14.1 and to Appendix C . Table 5 on page 24 of the written Method.
          11.2.1   Criteria for Peak Gaussian Factor (PGF) (effective 07/11/89; See Appendix K;
                  Addendum 07/11/89)
    •     Using PGF data points for the first 20 valid sets of Method 6 data, calculate x, standard
          deviation, and RSD. if BSD <. 20%  and no more than 3 outliers,

               establish a 3 o control chart around x, with x +. 2 RSD as warning limits; x ± 3 RSD
               as control limits.

    •     Plot the succeeding 5 PGF data points for the next 5 sets.

    •     Reconstruct control charts for each  5 sets using the most recently generated PGF data
          points and dropping the 5 'oldest' data points.

               RSD should be < 20%

               no more than 3 outliers

    •     Two successive data points outside control limits presents an out-of-control situation
          which must be corrected before proceeding.

    11.3 GC/MS Confirmation
    •     GC/MS Confirmation will be required for all compounds confirmed by second column GC
          analysis.

-------
                                                                      Section No. 11
                                                                      Revision No. 4
                                                                      Dote: December 1989
                                                                      Page 3 of 7
•    The sample is to be compared to a standard prepared at the concentration determined for
     the sample, on either the primary or secondary column, whichever concentration is lower.

•    If additional sample treatment is performed for GC/MS analysis (blowdown, etc.), the
     standard and sample must both undergo the same treatment.

•    Results of the GC/MS analysis are simply reported as the presence or absence of the
     analyte.

•    Mass Spectral Confirmation Codes

           MIS        •     Three individual ions are scanned

           SPECTRA  -     All or a significant portion of the spectra are scanned

11.4 Control Charts

     11.4.1  Establishing Control Charts

A.   ECU, as a referee lab for Method 6, will be required to demonstrate control of the
     measurement system via use of control charts. Control must be demonstrated for each
     analyte for which quantitation is required and for the surrogate at a concentration equal to
     that spiked into samples.

B.   To establish the control charts, following initial demonstration of capability, 5  reagent
     water samples will be spiked at 10 times the Minimal Reporting Level (MRL) for the
     method and carried through extraction and analysis.  Only results of analytes on the
     primary column are used in establishing the control charts. An additional 15 samples will
     be spiked and analyzed, 5 on each of 3 days. The data from these 20 spiked samples
     will be used to construct control charts.

C.   Criteria for Accuracy and Precision

     1.    The RSDs for any analyte must be <. 20%, except where data, generated by Battelle
           at the corresponding level, indicated poorer precision. The RSDs exceeding 20%
           will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by Technical Monitors for each method.

     2.    The mean recovery (x) of each analyte must lie between Battelles' mean recovery
           for each analyte (at the corresponding level) ± 3 times the RSD for that analyte as
           determined by Battelle during methods development, but no greater than Battelle's
           mean recovery +. 30%.

           Example:

                For an analyte 'A*

                •     Battelle demonstrated recovery (x) of 80% for Analyte 'A' with RSD of
                      5%. Acceptable recoveries will be 80% ± 3 (5%) = 80% ± 15% = 65%
                      -95%;

                •     or, Battelle demonstrated recovery (x) of 80% with RSD of 15% for
                      analyte 'A". The acceptable recovery would be limited to 80% ± 30% =
                      50%-110%.

-------
                                                                               Section No. 11
                                                                               Revision No. 4
                                                                               Date: December 1989
                                                                               Page 4 of 7
            3.    Surrogate

                 In establishing the control chart for the surrogate, criteria in C(1) and (2) above,
                 apply; it follows that one of the spike mixes must contain the surrogate at the
                 concentration as spiked into actual samples.

                 Surrogate recoveries from samples will be required to be within ± 30% of the mean
                 recovery determined for that surrogate during the initial demonstration of capabil-
                 ities.

                 An LCS in which the surrogate compound recovery has failed to meet the quality
                 control limits can be validated if the following conditions are met.

                 a.    The LCS meets all other quality control criteria; and

                 b.    the surrogate compound recovery observed for the Method Blank, associated
                       with the same sample set,  meets the quality control limits determined using
                       the control chart for that surrogate.

            4.    Warning  Limits/Control Limits

                 The control charts will be drawn  up so as to depict both warning limits (+ 2 o) and
                 control limits (± 3  o) about the mean.

            11.4.2 Outliers

      Dixon's test will be used to determine outliers. There can be no more than 3 outliers per analyte

from the 20 spiked controls. The Dixon test for outliers can be found in Appendix F.

            11.4.3   Plotting Data on Control Charts

      Data (analyte recoveries in percent) from the LCS on the primary column will be plotted on the

control chart for each analyte.
            11.4.4   Out-of-Corrtrol Situations

      1.     In the following instances, analytical work must be stopped until an "in-control" situation is
            established.

            a.    The same analyte is outside ± 3 o twice in a row, even though  > 85% of the total
                 analytes  are in control.

      2.     An 'alert* situation arises when one of the following occurs:

            a.    Three or more consecutive points for an analyte are outside +. 2 o but inside the ±
                 3o

            b.    A run of 7 consecutive points for an analyte above or below the mean.

            c.    A run of 7 points for an analyle in increasing or decreasing order.

                 The 'alert" situation implies a trend toward an 'out-ofcontrof situation.  The analyst
                 is required to evaluate his analytical system before proceeding.  If "alert" or "out-of-
                 control' situations occur frequently, re-establishing control charts may be required
                 by the ECL Project Leader before analytical work can proceed.

-------
                                                                           Section No. 11
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Date: December 1989
                                                                           Page 5 of 7
           11.4.5  Updating Control Charts
      Following establishment of the control chart, a spiked control (s) is part of each analytical or
sample "set".  When 5 such controls have been run, the recoveries of these analytes will be
incorporated into the  control chart by adding these 5 most recent recoveries to the 20 original points
and then deleting the first 5 of the original points. Accuracy and precision are re-calculated and the
chart re-drawn.  The newly drawn chart will then apply to all data in sample sets subsequent to the
last one used to update the chart.
      In the event there were 1-3 outliers when establishing the control chart, add the 5 most recent
points and delete only the first 2-4 points so that a total of 20 points are used in the up-dated control
chart.
      11.5 Other QC Checks Performed at ECL
           11.5.1  Quality Control Data Sheet
      Information on all solvents, reagents, and solutions used during each NPS set extraction and
cleanup, must be kept on a 'QUALITY CONTROL DATA SHEET. This information sheet would also
record storage conditions and disposal. See Appendix G.
           11.5.2  NPS Groundwater Quality Assurance Data Form
      Before any work begins on samples or controls, a 'NFS GROUNDWATER QUALITY
ASSURANCE DATA FORM1, is initiated by the processing laboratory. After extraction, concentration,
and cleanup, all pertinent set information is recorded on this form.  This form and information for
completing it are in Appendix G.
      11.6 Exceptions to the QAPjP
           11.6.1  Request for Approval
      Occasionally, it may become necessary for personnel assigned to the NPS to request approval
for exceptions or deviations from this QAPjP. This approval must come from the ECL Project Leader
and may be initially requested either verbally  or in writing, but in either case, the request must be
supported by a clear  rationale, laboratory data, and documentation.  When approval is requested, the
particular issue or exception will be assigned a reference number consisting of the laboratory name,
and a number to differentiate  among the several discussions that may take place on that day.
           EXAMPLE: ECL 3-040888-1 indicates that an exception to the QAPjP for Method 6
                     was requested on April 8, and it was the first one that day.
           11.6.2  Documentation and Following Requirements
      The ECL Project Leader will enter into a log book the reference number, the exception
requested, and the  information and documentation required to support approval of the exception to
the QAPjP.
      The person requesting the exception to the QAPjP must prepare a folder labelled with the
reference number and his/her name, and within a time frame specified by the ECL Project Leader

-------
                                                                            Section No. 11
                                                                            Revision No. 4
                                                                            Date: December 1989
                                                                            Page 6 of 7
have in the folder documentation of the problem/ exception and all supporting information and data.
A form 'EXCEPTIONS TO NPS QAPjP1 is included at the end of this Section as Figure 11-1. A
completed version must be included with each request for an exception to the QAPjP.

-------
                                                                         Section No. 11
                                                                         Revision No. 4
                                                                         Date: December 1989
                                                                         Page 7 of 7
                                       FIGURE 11-1

                               EXCEPTIONS TO NFS QAPJP


Dale	     Method	

Reference No.	

Suggested Exception(s): 	
                                               Signature of Person Seeking Exception
Approved	   Disapproved

Comments: 	
                                                  Bob Maxey, Technical Monitor

-------
                                                                             Section No. 12
                                                                             Revision No. 4
                                                                             Dote:  December 1989
                                                                             Page 1 of 2
12.   AUDITS (Technical Systems/Data Quality/Performance Evaluation)
      12.1  Requirements
      Technical Systems and Data Quality Audits shall be conducted by the ECL QAC on NFS
Method 6 analytical work to assess the adherence to the QA Project Plan and to assess the quality of
data generated by the analytical systems.  Performance Evaluation Audits will be initiated by ECL's
QAC to evaluate the technical personnel and the analytical system.
      12.2  Frequency
           12.2.1  Technical Systems and Data Quality
      These audits shall be conducted at the beginning of the survey after (30 samples have been
analyzed and at least once every six months thereafter, exclusive of external audits.
           12.2.2  Performance
      At least one audit every six months.
      12.3  Nature of Audits
           12.3.1  Technical Systems Audits shall include the following:
                 12.3.1.1   Project Management System
                      12.3.1.1.1  Personnel - Qualifications
                      12.3.1.1.2 Documentation - QAPjP and SOPs
                      12.3.1.1.3 Communications about changes in requirements
                      12.3.1.1.4 Analyst feedback
                 12.3.1.2   Sample Tracking System - receipt through disposal or storage
                 12.3.1.3   Systems for Sample Preparations, e.g. extractions, clean up, etc.
                 12.3.1.4   Systems for Analytical Operations
                      12.3.1.4.1  Standards
                      12.3.1.4.2 Calibrations
                      12.3.1.4.3 Documentation of Analytical Operations
                      12.3.1.4.4 Corrective Action Loop
                      12.3.1.4.5 Instrument Maintenance
                 12.3.1.5   Data Management Systems
                      12.3.1.5.1  Collections
                      12.3.1.5.2 Reduction
                      12.3.1.5.3 Verification
                      12.3.1.5.4 Internal Review
                      12.3.1.5.5 Reporting
                      12.3.1.5.6 Use of QC Data at Bench Level
                      12.3.1.5.7 Data Storage and Retrieval

-------
                                                                              Section No. 12
                                                                              Revision No. 4
                                                                              Dote: December 1989
                                                                              Page 2 of 2
                 12.3.1.6  Laboratory Management Systems
                       12.3.1.6.1   Major Equipment Purchases
                       12.3.1.6.2   Services and Supplies (solvents, etc.)
                       12.3.1.6.3   Maintenance of Ancillary Equipment
                       12.3.1.6.4   General Physical Set Up - space, cross contamination, etc.
                       12.3.1.6.5   Cold Storage Facilities
            12.3.2  Data Quality Audits shall include tracking 3 samples from Method 6 from log-in
                   through preparation, primary and confirmatory analyses (including related set QC
                   checks and other information), data handling and disposal.
            12.3.3  Performance Evaluation Audits shall consist of providing a P-E sample every six
                   months.  The audit will consist of a P.E. solution to be spiked into a water matrix
                   and analyzed as a routine NPS sample. The concentration of the ETU in the P.E.
                   solution will be unknown to the analysts involved in the method.
      12.4  Standard
      ECL's Quality Assurance Project Plan for Method 6; Printed Analytical Procedure for Method 6
and ECL's Quality Assurance Facilities Plan.
      12.5  Reporting and Use of Audit Results
      Following any of the above audits, the ECL QAC shall report the results in writing to both the
Lab Section Chief and NPS Project Leader. If deficiencies are found, each shall be specifically
identified along with the cause,  if known. The QAC will provide a written  plan or suggestion for
corrective action to the NPS Project Leader with a copy to ECL's Section Chief. The QAC shall also
follow up with a limited audit to  verify that deficiencies were resolved by the proposed corrective
action.

-------
                                                                           Section No. 13
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Date: December 1989
                                                                           Page 1 of 2
13.   PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
      13.1  Gas Chromatographs
      A Hewlett Packard 5890A gas chromatograph with dual NitrogenPhosphorous Detectors (NPD)
and an H-P 7673A autosampler will be used for Method 6 analytical work. Ftoutine maintenance for
these instruments is described below.
      Maintenance Item                           Schedule
      •     change injection port septa             •     bi-weekly or as needed
      •     change compressed gas traps and filter  •     every 6 months or as required
              dryers
      •     service or change injection port liner     •     as required by instrument performance
      •     bake-out or replacement of GC column   •     daily or as required by instrument
      •     detector replacement (collectors)         •     as required by instrument performance
      Spare parts are maintained at ECL to accommodate the above maintenance requirements, and
at least one spare GC column of each required type is on hand.  ECL has a blanket purchase order
with Hewlett-Packard. Through it, parts and service can be accessed by telephone and usually are
provided in 2-5 working days, if needed.
      A log book will be maintained for each instrument.  In it will be kept records of all daily or
routine maintenance, problems and their resolution, and major repairs. It is the responsibility of the
analyst to make the above entries, and sign and date them.
      13.2  GC/MS
      The following schedule of maintenance tasks and spare parts applies to the Varian Mat 312.
      Routine maintenance will be performed on the GC/MS and purge and trap units in accordance
with the following schedule:
      Tasks                            Frequency
      Clean source                     Monthly or as required by performance
      Bake out magnetic and             Monthly or as required by performance
        electric sectors
      Bake out GC column              Daily or as required
      Change  pump oil                 Every 6 months or as required by use
      Change  GC column               As required by performance
      Change  injection port septa        Weekly or as required
      Clean injection port liner           Monthly or as required by performance
      Most maintenance is done inhouse. When a problem is encountered which cannot be resolved
here,  Finnigan MAT is contacted and service is arranged. Critical spare pants are also available to
minimize downtime and the following list of replacement parts and consumable spares is maintained
within the laboratory at all times.
      1)    Columns (at least one of each type used)
      2)    Ferrules for columns
      3)    Syringes
      4)    Filaments (at least two of each)

-------
                                                                           Section No. 13
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Dote:  December 1989
                                                                           Page 2 of 2
5)    Gold gaskets
6)    Injection port septa
7)    Vacuum pump oil

-------
                                                                          Section No. 14
                                                                          Revision No. 4
                                                                          Date: December 1989
                                                                          Page 1 of 3
14.  SPECIFIC PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DATA

     The formulas in this section are those used to calculate internal QC checks and statistics related

to QC checks.

     14.1  Formulas Related to Instrument Control Standards and Determination of
           Chromatographlc and Column Performance

     •     Peak Symmetry Factor (PSF). See Figure 14-1 at the end of this section.

           PSF=       VW1/2)
                     0.5 X W(1/2)

           , where W(1/2)   =    the width of the front of the chromatographic peak at half-height,
                                assuming the peak is split at the highest point and W(l/2) is the
                                peak width at half height.

     •     Peak Gaussian Factor (PGF). See Figure 14-1 at the end of this section.

           PGF = 1.83XVW1/2) , where
           W(1/2) = peak width at half-height

           W(1/10) = peak width at tenth-height.

     •     Resolution (R)

           R = t/W , where

           t = the difference in elution times between two peaks, and

           W = the average peak width, at the baseline, of the two peaks.

     14.2  Formulas For Calculating Statistics

     •     Standard Deviation(s)
                      n
                      S  (xr~x)2
                     i=1	  .where
                           n-1

           x^.x,, = individual sample values

              x  = sample mean
              n  = sample size or no. of sample values

           Coefficient of Variation (CV)

           CV=  s

-------
                                                                       Section No. 14
                                                                       Revision No. 4
                                                                       Dote:  December 1989
                                                                       Page Z of 3
•     Relative Standard Deviation (BSD)

      RSD = CVX100

•     Mean Recovery (R)

                n
      R=       S  Rj/n
                i=1

•     Percent Recovery (%R)

      %R =  (net value of spike) X 100
              True value of spike     .where

      (net value of spike) = (gross value) - (value attributed to background or Blank)

•     Minimum Detection Limit (MDL)

      MDL = sXt(.99)(n_1)         .where

      t(.99) = 'Student's t-value appropriate for a one tailed test at 99% confidence level and a

      standard deviation estimate with (n-1) degrees of freedom.

14.3  Formulas Defining Control Limits

      Upper Control Limit (UCL) = R + 3s

      Upper Warning Limit (UWL) = R + 2s

      Lower Warning Limit (LWL) = R - 2s

•     Lower Control  Limit (LCL) = R - 3s    .where

      R = Mean Recovery

      S = Standard  Deviation

-------
                                                      Section No. 14
                                                      Revision No. 4
                                                      Date: December 1989
                                                      Page 3 of 3
                       FIGURE 14-1

EQUATION USED TO CALCULATE PEAK SYMMETRY FACTOR (PSF)
            AND PEAK GAUSSIAN FACTOR (PGF)
                                                              H
                                                    PSF
                                                    PGF =.
                                                            0.5  x W
                                                                    i
                                                             1.03  x  W
                                                                M/IO
                                  sn
                                                           sa. as
                  N I H II t C 8

-------
                                                                           Section No. 15
                                                                           Revision No. 4
                                                                           Date: December 1989
                                                                           Page 1 of 1
15.  CORRECTIVE ACTION
     Corrective action is required when out-of-control situations develop regarding QC criteria,
procedures, or specific Survey requirements. Sections 5 and 11 contain specific QC objectives and
criteria for this Method, and Section 7 contains specific sampling and tracking requirements. All of
these elements are evaluated as required by established NFS guidelines, and log books are
maintained as documentation.
     An analyst, team member, or Sample Custodian experienced with this Method and involved in
day-to-day activities with it will be the first to be aware of a problem, inconsistency, or QC parameter
outside acceptance limits. It is his/her responsibility to note the nature and significance of the
problem and to bring it to the attention of the ECL Project Leader.  Such problems shall be properly
documented through use of the 'SAMPLE RECEIPT SCREENS FOR NPS LABORATORIES' (refer to
end of  Section 7) and a related log book in Sample Receiving or by means of the 'QUALITY
ASSURANCE DATA FORM' (See Appendix G.).
     The following areas will be addressed:
     •    specific exception to the QC requirement
     •    when the problem was first noted and by whom
     •    who was notified
     •    corrective or remedial action required
     •    action taken
     •    verification that a QC exception or problem was resolved and the date
     •    sample 'set1 numbers and specific samples involved
     If the ECL Project Leader cannot readily resolve the problem or provide guidance for corrective
action,  the ECL Quality Assurance Coordinator (ECL QAC) must be notified. The QAC will take a lead
role in  developing a strategy to resolve the problem.  Verification that the problem has been resolved
must also be provided before analytical work continues.
                                 ;•-
     AH QC exceptions, problems, corrective actions, and verification documentation must be
reported monthly to the ECL Project Leader for this Method. For any problems requiring involvement
of the ECL QAC, the ECL Project Leader must be immediately informed.

-------
                                                                         Section No. 16
                                                                         Revision No. 4
                                                                         Date: December 1989
                                                                         Page 1 of 4
16.  QA REPORTS TO MANAGEMENT
Internal Referee Laboratory QA Reporting System
     The ECL NPS Project Leader will interact daily with the analyst performing the bench work and
data generation for Method 6. The analyst will inform the Project Leader immediately when any QA
problem or unusual situation develops. The analyst will follow the verbal notification with a written note
explaining the problem. The ECL Project Leader will keep ECL's QA Coordinator informed and will
discuss unresolved problems with him. The Project Leader will inform the ECL Section Chief of major
problems.
     The analyst for Method 6 will complete an 'EPA REFEREE-LABORATORIES PROGRESS QA
REPORT". A copy of this form,  Figure 16-1, is included in this section. Copies of this form will be
submitted monthly to the Project Leader, who will in turn provide copies to the Section Chief and ECL
QA Coordinator. The ECL QA Coordinator will submit on a quarterly basis, copies of these forms to
OPP's Quality Assurance Officer and to the NPS Quality Assurance Officer.  Copies of the ECL internal
audit reports (refer to Section 12.5) will be sent to OPP's Quality Assurance Officer.
Referee Laboratory Responsibilities for External Contract Monitoring - QA Monitoring • QA
Reporting System
     Six copies of the Primary  Analytical Contractor Laboratory's report are to be provided monthly to
the ECL Technical Monitor for Method 6. These reports are to be provided within 15 calendar days
after the end of the month being reported.  The format of this report is covered in the contractor's
QAPjP for Method 6.
     The Technical Monitor for Method 6 will provide the ECL Analytical Coordinator with a quarterly
TECHNICAL MONITOR PROGRESS - QA REPORT, Figure 16-2, a copy of which appears in this
section. Copies of the 'MONTHLY CONTRACT MONITORING - QA REPORT1 for that quarter will be
attached to the TECHNICAL MONITOR REPORT.  A copy of these reports will also be provided
quarterly by the ECL Analytical  Coordinator to E-CL's Quality Assurance Coordinator, to OPP's QAO
and to the NPS QAO.
     The ECL Analytical Coordinator will submit an 'ANALYTICAL COORDINATOR STATUS REPORT
through the ECL Section Chief to the Director of the NPS. Copies of the quarterly reports from the
Technical Monitor will be attached to the 'ANALYTICAL COORDINATOR  STATUS REPORT,  Figure 16-
3.  A copy of this report is included in this section.

-------
                                                                 Section No. 16
                                                                 Revision No. 4
                                                                 Date: December 1989
                                                                 Page 2 of 4
Method 0
                                  FIGURE 16-1

                 EPA REFEREE LABORATORY PROGRESS - QA REPORT
Report Period

Analyst 	

Date
 I.   Progress:

     0  samples  received

     S  samples  analyzed
     9 samples invalidated
     No. of data sets sent to EPA Data Manager

 2.  Standards:  9 stock standards diluted 	
                 Results of check before using  dilution

 3.  Bench  Level Corrective Actions  (s)

     Date
     Problem
      Action Taken
      Verification of Correction
      Sample set  analyzed prior to problem 		
      (Use back of page  and same format  co report additional corrective
      actions.)

  A.  Problems  (Project-Related):


   5.  Information requested by Technical Monitor - (control charts, etc.)

   6.  Changes  la Personnel:


   7.  Comments:

-------
                                                               Section No. 16
                                                               Revision No. 4
                                                               Date. December 1989
                                                               Page 3 of 4
                                FIGURE 16-2
                  TECHNICAL MONITOR PROGRESS - QA REPORT
Method
Laboratory
Report Period

Date 	
 I.   Progress:

     * samples received  	

     t samples analyzed  	

      t samples  invalidated	•

      No.  for data sees  sent to EPA. Data Manager

  2.   Major Problems and Status

      a.   Technical:
       b.  Contractural:
    3.  Comments

-------
                                                                 Section No. 16
                                                                 Revision No. 4
                                                                 Date: December 1989
                                                                 Page 4 of 4
                                  FIGURE 16-3
                    ANALYTICAL COORDINATOR STATUS REPORT
                                                      Report  r«±rioa_

                                                      Prepared By _

                                                      Date
Monthly - Financial  States

        - Contract Administrative Needs
   Quarterly - Data Summary

             - Copies of quarterly reports  from Technical Monitors

-------
                                    Appendix A
                                    Revision No. 4
                                    Date: December 1989
                                    Page 1 of 6
   APPENDIX A

SAMPLE CUSTODY

-------
                                ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY
                                        NPS SAMPLE LOGGING
METHOD
       (1,3,6)
                                                PREPARED BY:


                                                DATE:
LAB. I.D.
(FIELD SAMPLE f)
                                                I
DATE SAMPLBD
DATE SHIPPED    I DATE RECEIVED
TIME SAMPLED  | CONDI

-------
                           NFS SET COMPOSITION FORM
                                  METHOD 6

APPROVED BY PROJECT OFFICER                             Set No.	
SIGNATURE
DATE	


                           SET CONTROLS

1. Method Blank

2. Lab Control Spike


                           NFS FIELD  SAMPLES

      Field Sample No.       Date Sampled          Date Arrived At ECL

3. 	       	          	

4. 	       	

5.

6.
8.

9.

10.

-------
                           SAMPLE CONTROL RECORD
                                  EPA/ECL
LABORATORY
SAMPLE  NO.
REMOVED
  BY
DATE AND TIME
   REMOVED
REASON
DATE AND TIME
   RETURNED
                                             "T"
                           -

-------
                           ECL NFS SAMPLE TRACKING FORM
                                            METHOD 6
Set #	

Sample Nurcber
Date
Sample
Taken
Date
Rec'd
at ECL
Date
Extracted
Date
Analysis
Completed
Date Removed
for GC/MS
Confirmation
GC/MS
Confirmation
Completed

-------
                            NFS Method #6.Extract Storage Data Sheet

Extracts  Relinquished By	Date:	Received By
                                                                Set:
                                                                    Date:
.•tap le Code
ho Stored
Date
Stored
lefrig. or
 reezer No.
loom No.
lemoved
By
urpose
Date
Removed
Returned
by
Date
Return
             Date Disposed:
                                      Authorized by:

-------
                                       Appendix B
                                       Revision No. 4
                                       Date: December 1989
                                       Page 1 of 27
    APPENDIX B

BATTELLE'S VERSION

-------
       Method 6.   Determination of Ethylene Thiourea (ETU)  in Ground
      Water by Gas Chromatography with a Nitrogen-Phosphorus Detector


1 .    SCOPE AND APPLICATION

     1.1   This is a gas chromatographic  (GC) method applicable to the
           determination of ethylene  thiourea (ETU, Chemical  Abstracts
           Registry No. 96-45-7)  in ground water.

      1.2   This method has been validated in a  single  laboratory.  The
           estimated detection limit  (EDL)  has  been determined and is
           listed in Table 2.  Observed detection limits may vary between
           ground waters, depending upon the nature of interferences in  the
            sample matrix  and the specific instrumentation  used.

      1.3   This method is restricted to use by or under the supervision  of
            analysts experienced  in the use of GC and  in the  interpretation
            of gas chromatogrctr.s.  Each analyst must demonstrate  the  ability
            to generate acceptable results with this method using the
            procedure described in Section  10.2.

       1.4   When  this method is used  to analyze unfamiliar samples for ETU,
             identification must be  confirmed by at  least one additional
             qualitative technique.

 2.    SUMMARY OF  METHOD

       2.1    The  ionic  strength and pH of a measured 50-mL  volume  of  sample
             are  adjusted  by  addition of ammonium chloride  and  potassium
             fluoride.   The  sample is poured onto an Extrelut column.  ETU  is
             eluted from the  column in 400 mL of methylene  chloride.   The
             extract is solvent, exchanged to ethyl  acetate  and  concentrated
             to a volume of 5 mL. Chromatographic conditions  are  described
             which permit the separation  and measurement of ETU in the
             extract by GC with a nitrogen-phosphorus  detector  (NPO).

  3.   DEFINITIONS

       3.1    Artificial ground water  -- sn aqueous  matrix designed to mimic a
              real  ground water sample.   The artificial ground water  should be
              reproducible for use by  others.

       3.2    Calibration  standard --  a known amount of a pure  analyte,
              dissolved in an organic solvent, analyzed under the  same
              procedures  and  conditions used to analyze sample  extracts
              containing  that analyte.

        3.3   Estimated detection limit (EDt) -- The minimum concentration  of
              a substance that  can be measured and  reported with  confidence
              that the analyte concentration  is greater than, zero as
              determined from the analysis of a sample in  a given matrix
               •    .      •            •                  •
                                           1

-------
      containing the analyte.  The EDL  is equal to the level
      calculated by multiplying the  standard deviation of replicate
      measurements times the  students'  t value appropriate for a 99
      percent confidence level and a standard deviation estimate v.Uh
      n-1 degrees of freedom or the  level of the compound in  a sample
      yielding a peak in the final extract 'with signal-to-noise  ratio
      of approximately five,  whichever value is higher.

3.4   Internal standard -- a pure compound  added  to  a  sample  extract
      in a known  amount and used  to  calibrate  concentration
      measurements  of other analytes that are  sample components.  The
      internal  standard must be a compound that  is not a sample
      component.

3.5   Instrument quality  control (QC)  standard -- an ethyl  acetate
      solution  containing specified concentrations of specified
      analytes.   The instrument QC  standard is analyzed each working
      day  prior to the  analysis of  sample extracts and calibration
      standards.  The performing laboratory uses  this solution  to
      demonstrate acceptable instrument performance in the areas of
       sensitivity, column performance, and chromatographic
       performance.

 3.6   Laboratory control (LC) standard --  a solution  of  ETU  prepared
       in the laboratory by dissolving a known amount  of  pure ETU in a
       known amount  of reagent water.  In this method, the  1C standard
       is prepared by adding an appropriate volumes  of the  ETU standard
       solution  to  reagent water.

 3.7   Laboratory reagent blank --  an  aliquot of reagent water analyzed
       as  if it  were a  sample.

 3.8   Performance evaluation sample -- A water-soluble solution of
       method analytes  distributed  by the Quality Assurance  Branch.
       Environmental Monitoring  and Support Laboratory, USEPA,  Cincin-
        nati, Ohio.  A small  measured volume of the  solution  is  added  to
        a known volume of reagent water and analyzed using  procedures
        identical to those used for  samples.  Analyte  true  values are
        unknown to the analyst.

  3.9   Quality control check sample -- a water  soluble solution
        containing  known  concentrations of analytes  prepared by a
        laboratory  other  than the laboratory performing the analysis.
        The  performing  laboratory uses this solution to demonstrate that
         it can  obtain acceptable identifications and measurements with  a
        method.   A small  measured volume of the solution is  added to  a
         known volume of reagent water and analyzed with procedures
         identical to those used  for samples.  True values of analytes
         are  known by the analyst.

   3.10   Stock standard solution  --  a concentrated solution containing a
         certified standard that is  a method analyte,  or a  concentrated

-------
          solution of an analyte prepared in the laboratory w^h an
          assayed reference compound.

     3.11  Surrogate standard --  a  pure compound added  to  a  sample  in  a
          known amount and used  to detect gross abnormalities  during
           sample preparation.  The surrogate standard  must  be  a  compound
           that is not a sample component.

4.   INTERFERENCES    -   •      .

     A.I   Method interferences may be caused by contaminants in solvents,
           reagents,  glassware and other sample processing apparatus that
           lead to discrete artifacts or elevated baselines in gas chrom-
           atograms.  " All  reagents and apparatus must be routinely demon-
           strated to be free from  interferences under the conditions  of
           the analysis  by running  laboratory method blanks as described  in
           Section 10.8.

           A.1.1    Glassware must  be  scrupulously cleaned.^  Clean  all .
                    glassware as  soon  as  possible after use  by  thoroughly
                    rinsing with  the last solvent used  in  it.   Follow  by
                    washing with  hot water and  detergent  and thorough
                    rinsing with  tap and  reagent water. Drain dry,  and heat
                    in an oven or muffle  furnace at  AOO'C for 1 hour.   Do
                    not heat volumetric ware.   Thermally  stable materials
                    might not be eliminated  by  this  treatment.   Thorough
                    rinsing with acetone and methylene chloride may be
                    substituted for the heating.  After drying and cooling,
                    seal  and  store glassware in a clean environment to
                    prevent any accumulation of dust or other contaminants.
                    Store inverted  or capped with aluminum  foil.

             4.1.2   The  use of high purity  reagents and solvents helps to
                     minimize interference problems.  Purification of
                     solvents by  distillation  in all-glass systems may be
                     required.

       A.2    Interfering contamination may occur when  a sample containing z
              low concentration of ETU is  analyzed immediately following a
              sample containing a relatively  high concentration of ETU.
              Between-sample rinsing of the  sample syringe and associated
              equipment with ethyl acetate can minimize sample cross contamin-
              ation.   After analysis of a sample containing high concentra-
              tions of ETU,  one or more injections of ethyl acetate  should be
              made to  ensure that accurate values are obtained  for the  next
              sample.

        A.3    Matrix interferences  may be caused by contaminants  that  are
              coextracted from the  sample.   The extent  of  matrix interferences
              will vary considerably from source to source,  depending  upon the
              ground water sampled. Positive identifications must  be  confirm-
              ed using the confirmation column  specified  in Table 1.

-------
5.   SAFETY
5.1   ETU is a cancer  suspect  agent  and  teratogen.  Primary standaids
      of ETU should be prepared  in  a hood.   A NIOSH/KESA approved
      toxic gas respirator should  be worn when the analyst handles
      high concentrations of ETU.   Each  laboratory is responsible for
      maintaining a current awareness file of OSHA regulations
      regarding the .safe handling of the chemicals specified in this
      method.  A reference file of material safety data  sheets should
      also  be made available to all personnel  involved  in  the chemical
      analysis.  Additional references to laboratory  safety  are
                                        ^
            available and  have  been  identified     for t^e information of the
            analyst.

 6.   APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT (All  specifications are suggested.  Catalog
      numbers are included for illustration only.)

      6.1   SAMPLING EQUIPMENT

            6.1.1    Grab sample bottle -- 60-ml screw cap vials  (Pierce  No.
                     13075 or equivalent) and caps equipped  with  a  PTFE-faced
                     silicone septa  (Pierce No. 12722 or  equivalent).   Prior
                     to use, wash and heat vials  and  septa  as described in
                     Section 4.1.1.

       6.2    GLASSWARE

             6.2.1   Concentrator  tube,  Kuderna-Oanish (K-0) -- 10- or 25-ir,L,
                     graduated (Kontes  K-5700SO-2S25, K-S700SO-102S or
                     equivalent).   Calibration must be checked at the volurr.es
                     employed in the test.   Ground glass stoppers are used  tc
                     prevent evaporation of extracts.

             6.2.2   Evaporative flask, K-0 -- 500-tnL (Kontes  K-570001-0500
                     or equivalent).  Attach to concentrator tube with
                     springs.

             6.2.3   Snyder column, K-0  -- three-ball macro (Kontes  K-503000-
                     0121 or equivalent).

              6.2.4    Vials  --  Glass, 5-  to  10-ml capacity  with TFE-fluoro-
                      carbon  lined  screw cap.

        6.3   Boiling stones  -- carborundum,' S12  granules (Arthur H. Thomas
              Co. S1590-033).   Heat at  400'C for  30 rain prior  to use.  Cool
              and store in a desiccator.

        6.4   Water  bath -- Heated, capable of temperature  control  (±2'C).
              The bath should be used in a hood.

-------
   6.5    Balance  --  Analytical,  capable of  accurately  weighing to the
         nearest  0.0001 g.

   6.6    Tube heater -- Capable of holding  eight K-0 concentrator tubes
         and heating the mid-section of  the tubes to 3S-40*C while
         applying a nitrogen stream.

   6.7   GAS CHROMATOGRAPH  -- Analytical  system complete with GC suitable
         for use with  capillary columns and all required accessories
         including  syringes, analytical  columns, gases, detector and
         stripchart recorder.   A data system  is recommended  for measuring
         peak  areas.

         6.7.1   Primary column --  10 m long  x 0.25 mm 1.0.  03-Wax  bonded
                  fused silica  column, 0.25 urn film thickness (available
                  from J&W). Validation data  presented in this method
                  were obtained using this  column.   Alternative columns
                  may be used in accordance with the provisions described
                  in Section 10.3.

          6.7.2   Confirmation column --5m long x 0.25 mm  1.0. 06-1701
                  bonded fused  silica column,  0.25 urn  film thickness
                  (available from J&U).

          6.7.3   Detector  -- Nitrogen-phosphorus detector  (NPO).   This
                  detector  has  proven effective  in  the analysis of  spiked
                  reagent and  artificial ground waters.   A  NPD was  used  to
                  generate  the  validation  data presented  in this method.
                  Alternative  detectors, including  a  mass spectrometer,
                  may be used  in  accordance with the  provisions  described
                   in Section 10.3.

7.    P.£AG£NTS AND CONSUMABLE KATEP.IALS

     7.1   Reagent water --  Reagent water  is defined as water in which an
           interferent is not observed at  or above the EDL of any analyte.
           Reagent water used to generate  the validation data  in this
           method was distilled water obtained from the Magnetic Springs
           Water Co.,  Columbus, Ohio.

     7.2   Acetone, methylene chloride, ethyl  acetate  -- Oistilled-in-glass
           quality  or equivalent.

     7.3   Nitrogen gas  --  high purity.

      7.<    Extraction column,  Extrelut QE  -•  Obtained from EH Science
            (Catalog No.  902050-1).

      7.5   Ammonium chloride,  granular, ACS grade •- for pH and ionic
            strength adjustment of samples  (available from Baker Chemical
            Co.)-

-------
7.6   Potassium fluoride,  anhydrous,  ACS  grade  --  for  ionic strength
      adjustment of sample (available from Baker Chemical  Co )

7.7   Mercuric chloride, granular,  ACS grade -- used  as sample preser-
      vative  (available from Hallinckrodt).
                                    t

7.8   Dithiothreitol  (OTT) -- for use as a free-radical scavanger
       (available  from Aldrich Chemical Co.).

       7.8.1    OTT in  ethyl acetate,  1000 ug/mL  -- Prepare  by adding
               1  g OTT to  a 1-L volumetric flask and diluting to  volume
               with ethyl  acetate.  Store  at room  temperature.

 7.9   Propylene thiourea  (PTU)  ••-  for use as a surrogate  standard.
       Prepared from carbon disulfide and  1,2-diaminopropane using the
       procedure published by Hardtmann,  et. al.  (Journal  of Medicinal
       Chemistry, 18(5), 447-453,  1975).

 7.10  3,4,S,6-Tetrchycro-2-pyrimicinethiol  (THP)  --  >98% purity,  for
       use as  an  internal  standard (available  from Aldrich Chemical
       Co.).

 7.11  STOCK  STANDARD SOLUTION (0.10  ug/uL) -  The stock standard
       solution  may be  purchased as  a certified solution or prepared
       from  pure standard material using the following procedure:

       7.11.1  Prepare  stock standard solution by accurately weighing
                approximately 0.0010  g of  pure  ETU.  Dissolve  the ETU  in
                ethyl  acetate containing  1000 ug/mL of  OTT  and  dilute  to
                volume in  a  10-mL  volumetric flask.  Larger volumes may
                be used at the convenience of the  analyst.   If ETU
                purity, is  certified at 96% or greater,  the weight may be
                used without  correction to calculate  the  concentration
                of  the stock standard.  Commercially  prepared stock
                standards may be used at any concentration if they are
                certified by the manufacturer or by an independent
                 source.

         7.11.2  Transfer the  stock standard solution into  a TFE-fluoro-
                 carbon-sealed screw  cap vial.  Store at 4*C and  protect
                 from  light.

         7.11.3  The stock standard solution should be  replaced  after  two
                 weeks qr  sooner  if comparison  with laboratory  control
                 standards indicates  a .problem.

   7.1Z  INTERNAL STANDARD SPIKING SOLUTION  --  Prepare  an  internal
         standard spiking  solution by accurately weighing  approximately
         0.0010 g of pure THP.  Dissolve the THP in ethyl  acetate
         containing 1000 ug/mL of OTT and dilute to volume in a 10-raL
         volumetric flask.  Transfer the internal  standard spiking
         solution  to  a TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap' bottle  and store

                                    * 6          '

-------
         at A'C  and  protect from  light.  Addition of 50 ul_ of the
         internal  standard spiking  solution to 5 ml of sample extract
         results in  a final internal  standard concentration of 1.0
         Solution should be replaced  when ongoing QC  (Section 10)
          indicates a problem.

    7.13   SURROGATE STANDARD SPIKING SOLUTION  --  Prepare  a  surrogate
          standard spiking  solution by accurately weighing  approximately
          0.0010 g of pure  PTU.  Dissolve the  PTU in ethyl  acetate
          containing  1000  ug/mL of DTT and dilute to volube in a  10-mL
          volumetric  flask.  Transfer the surrogate standard spiking
          solution to a  TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap bottle  and  store
          at <*C  and  protect  from light.  Addition of 5 uL of the
          surrogate  standard  spiking  solution to a 50-mL sample  prior to
          extraction  results  in a surrogate .standard concentration in the
          sample of  10  ug/L and,  assuming quantitative recovery of PTU, a
          surrogate  standard  concentration  in the final extract of
          0.10 ug/ml.

     7.14   INSTRUMENT QC STANDARD  -- Prepare the  instrument QC standardly
           adding 10  uL of  the ETU stock standard solution,  1.0 ml of  the
           internal standard spiking solution,  and 100 uL of the  surrogate
           standard spiking solution to a 100-mL volumetric flask and
           diluting to volume'with ethyl acetate containing 1000  ug/mL of
           OTT.  Transfer  the instrument QC standard to a TFE-fluoroccrbon-
           sealed screw  cap bottle  and  store at room temperature.
           Solution should be replaced when ongoing QC (Section  10)
           indicates  a  problem.

8.   SAMPLE COLLECTION.  PRESERVATION.  AND STORAGE

     8.1   Grab  samples must  be collected  in 60-ml  screw cap glass vials
            (Section  6.1.1).  Conventional  sampling  practices^ should  be
            followed;  however, the bottle must  not be  prerinsed with sample
            before collection.

     8.2    SAMPLE PRESERVATION AND STORAGE

            8.2.1   Add mercuric chloride to the sample bottle  in amounts  to
                    produce a concentration of 10 rog/L.  Add 60  uL of a
                    solution containing  10 mg/ml of mercuric chloride in
                    water  to the sample  bottle at the sampling site or  in
                    the  laboratory  before shipping to the sampling site.
                    Mercuric chloride  is a  highly toxic chemical.  Mercuric
                    chloride must be  handled with caution, and samples
                    containing mercuric chloride must be properly disposed.

            8.2.2  After  the sample  is collected  in  the bottle containing
                     preservative,  seal  the  sample bottle and shake vigor-
                     ously  for 1 min.

-------
          8.2.3.   £TU can degrade quickly in  water even when the sample is
                  refrigerated.  Samples should be extracted as soon as
                  possible and must be extracted within 14 days of
                  collection. The samples must be iced or refriaerated at
                  4*C and protected from light from the time of "col lection
                  until extraction.  Preservation study results given  in
                  Table 4  indicate that samples are stable  for 14 days
                  when  stored under these conditions.  However, analyte
                  stability  may  be affected by the matrix,  therefore,  the
                  analyst  should verify that the preservation  technique  is
                  applicable to  the samples under study.

    8.3    EXTRACT STORAGE

           8.3.1    Extracts should  be  stored  at 70*C  away from light.
                   Preservation study  results  given  in Table 4 indicate
                   that extracts  are  stable for at least 28 days when
                   stored under these  conditions.   The analyst should
                   verify appropriate  extract holding tines applicable to
                   the  samples under study.

8.   CALIBRATION

     9.1   Establish GC operating parameters equivalent  to  those  indicated
           in  Table  1.  The  GC system must be  calibrated  using the  internal
           standard  technique (Section  9.2).

     9.2    INTERNAL STANDARD CALIBRATION  PROCEDURE.   To use this  approach,
            the analyst must select one  or more internal  standards compat-
            ible in analytical behavior  to the compound of interest.  The
            analyst must further demonstrate  that the measurement of the
            internal standard is not  affected by method or matrix interfer-
            ences.   THP has been identified  as a suitable internal standard.

            9.2.1    Prepare  ETU calibration standards at  a  minimum of  three
                     (suggested five) concentration levels by  adding volumes
                     of  the ETU stock standard  to a volumetric  flask.   To
                     each calibration standard, add a  known  constant  amount
                     of  one or more internal standards,  and  dilute to  volume
                     with  ethyl acetate  containing  1000  ug/mL  of OTT.   One of
                     the calibration standards  should  be  representative of an
                     ETU concentration near, but  above,  the  EOL.   The other
                     concentrations should correspond  to the range of concen-
                     trations expected  in  the  sample  concentrates, or should
                     define the working  range  of the  detector.

             9.2.2   Inject 2 uL of each calibration standard and tabulate
                     the relative response for ETU to the internal standard
                      (RRa) using the equation:

                      RRa •  Aa/Ais

                              . •
                                          8

-------
                  where:   Aa  =  the  peak  area  of  ETU,  and
                          AJS =  the  peak  area  of  the internal standard.

                  Generate a calibration curve  of  RR2 versus £TU concen-
                  tration in the sample in pg/L.

          9.2.3   The working calibration curve must be verified on each
                  workipg shift by the measurement of one or more calibra-
                  tion standards.  If the ETU response varies from the
                  predicted  response by more than ±20%, the  test must be
                  repeated  using a fresh calibration standard.  Alterna-
                  tively, a new  ETU  calibration curve must  be prepared.

10.   QUALITY CONTROL

     10.1  Each laboratory using this method  is required  to  operate  a
           quality control (QC) program.  The  minimum requirements  of this
           program consist of the following:  an initial  demonstration of
           laboratory capability; the analysis  of  surrogate standards in
           each and every sample as a continuing  check on sample prepara-
           tion;  the monitoring of internal standard area counts or peak
           heights  in each and every sample as  a continuing check on system
           performance;  the  analysis of QC samples, laboratory control
            standards, and performance evaluation (PE) samples as continuing
           checks on  laboratory  performance; the analysis of  spiked  samples
            as  a continuing  check on  recovery performance; the analysis  of
            method blanks as a  continuing check on contamination; and
            frequent analysis of  the  instrument QC  standard  to assure
            acceptable instrument performance.

      10.2  INITIAL  DEMONSTRATION OF  CAPABILITY  --  To establish  the  ability
            to perform this  method,  the analyst must perform the following
            operations.

            10.2.1  Select a representative spike concentration (suggest
                    IS times the EDL) for ETU.   Using a stock standard that
                    differs  from calibration standard, prepare a laboratory
                    control  (LC) check sample~concentrate in methanol 1000
                    times more concentrated than the selected spike  concen-
                    tration.

             10.2.2  Using a syringe,  add  SO  uL of  the LC  sample concentrate
                     to  each of a minimum  of  four  SO-mL  aliquots of  reagent
                     water.   A representative ground water may be  used in
                     place of the reagent  water, but one  or  more unspiked
                     aliquots must  be analyzed  to  determine  background
                     levels, and the spike level  must,  at a minimum, exceed
                     twice the background level for the test to be valid.
                     Analyze the aliquots according to the method beginning
                      in  Section  11.

-------
     10.2.3  Calculate  the  average  percent  recovery (R)  an
-------
            •Reinject the laboratory method  blank extract.   If the
            reanalysis fails  the  70  to  130  percent recovery
            criteria, the analytical  system must be considered "out
            of control."  The problem must  be identified and
            corrected before continuing.

    10.4.4  When  the  surrogate recovery for a sample  is less  than  70
            percent  or  greater than 130 percent,  the  laboratory  must
            establish that the deviation is not due  to  laboratory
            problems.  The laboratory shall document  deviations  by
             taking the  following actions:

             (1)   Check  calculations  to  make sure  there are no
                  errors.

             (2)  Check internal  standard and surrogate standard
                  spiking solutions  for degradation, contamination,
                  or  other obvious  abnormalities.

              (3)   Check instrument performance.

              Recalculate or  reanalyze the  extract if  the  above  steps
              fail to reveal  the cause of the  noncompliant surrogate
              recoveries.   If reanalysis  of the  sample or  extract
              solves the problem, only  submit  the  sample data fron the
              analysis with surrogate spike recoveries within the
              required limits.   If reanalysis  of the sample or extract
              fails to solve the  problem,  then report all  data for
              that sample as suspect.

10.5  ASSESSING THE  INTERNAL STANDARD

      10.5.1  An  internal standard peak area or peak  height  check  must
              be  performed on all samples.   All sample  extracts  must
              be  fortified with the internal  standard.

      10.5.2   Internal  standard recovery must be  evaluated for
               acceptance by  determining whether the  measured peak  area
               or  peak height for the internal standard in any sample
               deviates  by  more than 30  percant  from the average peak
               area or height for the  internal  standard in the calibra-
               tion standards.

       10.5.3  When the  internal  standard peak area or height for any
               sample is outside  the'limit  specified in 10.5.2,  the
               laboratory must investigate.

               10.5.3.1  Single occurrence  -- Reinject  an  aliquot  of
                         the extract to ensure proper sample  injection.
                         If  the reinjected  sample extract  aliquot
                         displays an internal standard-  peak area or
                         height within specified  limits,  quantify  and
                                        .
                                    11

-------
                      report  results.   If  the  reinjected sample
                      extract aliquot displays an internal  standard
                      peak area  or  height  outside the specified
                      limits, but extract  aliquots from other
                      samples continue  to  give the proper area or
                      height for t'he internal  standard, assume an
                      error was  made during addition of the  internal
                      standard to the failed sample extract.   Repeat
                      the analysis  of that sample.

             10.5.3.2  Multiple Occurrence --  If  the  internal
                      standard peak areas or  heights  for successive
                      samples fail  the specified criteria  (10.5.2),
                      check  the instrument  for proper p£rformance.
                      After  optimizing instrument performance, check
                       the calibration  curve using a calibration
                       check  standard (Section 9).  If the  calibra-
                       tion curve is  still  applicable and if the
                       calibration  check  standard internal  standard
                       peak area or height is  within +307. of the
                       average internal standard peak area or height
                       for the calibration standards, reanalyze those
                       sample extracts  whose  internal standard failed
                       the specified criteria.   If the  internal
                       standard peak areas or heights now  fall within
                       the specified limits,  report  the results.   If
                       the internal standard  peak areas or heights
                       still  fail  to fall within the specified limits
                       or if the calibration  curve is no longer
                        applicable,  then generate a new calibration
                        curve (Section  9)  and  reanalyze those sample
                        extracts whose  internal  standard failed the
                        peak area or height criteria.

10.6  ASSESSING LABORATORY PERFORMANCE

      10.6.1  The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing  basis, analyze at
              least one  laboratory control  standard  per sample set  (a
              sample  set. is  all those  samples extracted within a
              24-hour period).

               10.6.1.1   The  spiking concentration in the laboratory
                         control standard  should  be 15 times the £01.

               10.6.1.2   Spike a reagent water aliquot with a labora-
                         tory control  (LC) sample concentrate  (the
                         volume  of  the  spike should be  kept to a
                         minimum so the solubility of the  analytes of
                          interest in water will  not be  affected) and
                          analyze it to determine  the concentration
                          after spiking (A) of each parameter.  Calcu-
                          late each percent  recovery  (Ri) as  (lOOxA)VT,
                    •                                 •
                                    12

-------
         where I is the  known  true  concentration of the
         spike.

10.6.1.3 Compare the percent recovery (R^) for each
         parameter with established QC acceptance
         criteria.  QC criteria are established by
          initially analyzing five laboratory control
          standards and calculating the average  percent
          recovery  (R) and the standard deviation of the
          percent recovery (Sp) using  the  following
          equations:
                 Rj/n
           and
          where:
                  /    ;  'n     \    .- n    \2

                 I-(I.  «,*)-(  I «,)
                   n-1 \i = l    /    \i = l   /
= number  of  measurements for each
  analyte, and
= individual percent recovery
  value.
            Calculate QC acceptance criteria  as follows:

                 Upper  Control Limit  (UCL)  «  R  *  3SR
                 Lower  Control Limit  (LCL)  =  R  -  3$R

            Alternatively,  the data generated during the
            initial demonstration  of  capability (Section
            10.2) can be used to set  the initial  upper and
            lower control  limits.

            Update the performance criteria on a contin-
            uous basis.  After each five to  ten  new
             recovery measurements (R^s), recalculate R and
             So using all the data, and  construct new
             control  limits.  When the total  number  of data
             points reach twenty, update the  control limits
             by calculating R and SR  using  only the  most
             recent twenty data  points.
                        13

-------
                      Monitor all data from laboratory control
                      standards.  Analyte recoveries must fall
                      within the established control limits.

                       If  the recovery of ETU falls outside  the
                       designated range, the laboratory performance
                       for ETU  is judged to be out of control,  and
                       the source of the problem must be  immediately
                       identified and  resolved before continuing the
                       analyses.  The  analytical result  for  ETU in
                       samples  is suspect and must be  so  labeled.
                       All results  for ETU  for that  sample set must
                       also be  labeled suspect.

     10.6.2  Each quarter, it is essential  that  the  laboratory
             analyze (if  available) QC check standards.   If the
             criteria established by the U.S.  Environmental Protec-
             tion Agency  (USEPA) and provided with the QC standards
             ire not met,  corrective action needs to be  taken  and
             documented.

      10.6.3 The laboratory must analyze an unknown performance
             evaluation  sample  (when  available) at least once a year.
             Results  for each  of the  target analytes need to  be
             w\thin acceptable limits established by USEPA.

10.7  ASSESSING ANALYTE RECOVERY

      10.7.1  The laboratory must,  on an ongoing basis,  spike each of
              the target  analytes into ten percent of the samples.

               10.7.K1  The spiking concentration in the  sample should
                        be one to  five times the background concentra-
                         tion, or,  if  it is impractical to determine
                         background levels before spiking,  15  times  the
                         EOL.

               10.7.1.2  Analyze one  sample aliquot  to determine the
                         background concentration  (8)  of  each  para-
                         meter.  Spike a second  sample  aliquot with a
                         laboratory control  (LC)  sample concentrate
                          (the volume of the spike should be kept to a
                         minimum so the solubility of the analytes of
                          interest  in water will  not be affected) and
                          analyze it to determine the concentration
                          after spiking (A) of each parameter.   Calcu-
                          late each percent recovery (Rj)  as
                          100(A-8)%/T, where T is the known  true •
                          concentration of the spike.

                10.7.1.3   Compare the  percent recovery  (R^)  for each
                          parameter with QC  acceptance criteria deter-

                                    14

-------
                       mined by the analysis  of laboratory control
                       standards.

                       Monitor all data from dosed samples.  Analyte
                       recoveries must fall within the established
                       control limits.

              10.7.1.4   If  the  recovery of  ETU  falls outside the
                       designated  range, and the  laboratory perfor-
                       mance for ETU  is judged to be  in control, the
                        recovery  problem encountered with  the dosed
                        sample is judged to be  matrix-related,  not
                        system-related.  The  result for ETU in  the
                        unspiked  sample is  labeled suspect/matrix to
                        inform the user that  the results are suspect
                        due to matrix effects.

10.8  ASSESSING LABORATORY CONTAMINATION (METHOD BLANKS) --  Before
      processing  any samples,  the analyst must demonstrate that all
      glassware and reagent  interferences  are  under control.  This is
      accomplished by  the  analysis of a laboratory method  blank.  A
      laboratory  method blank  is a 50-mL aliquot  of reagent water
      analyzed  as if  it was  a  sample.  Each time  a set of  samples  is
      extracted or  there  is  a  change  in reagents,  a laboratory method
      blank must  be  processed  to assess laboratory contamination.   If
      the method  blank exhibits  a  peak within  the retention time
      window of ETU which is greater  than  or equal  to one-half  the  EOL
      for ETU,  determine  the source  of contamination  before processing
      samples and eliminate the  interference problem.

 10.9 -ASSESSING  INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE (INSTRUMENT QC STANDARD)  --
       Instrument performance should be monitored on a daily basis  by
       analysis of the instrument QC standard.   The instrument QC
       standard contains compounds designed to indicate appropriate
       instrument sensitivity, column performance and chromatographic
       performance.   Instrument QC standard components and performance
       criteria are listed in  Table 5.  Inability to  demonstrate
       acceptable instrument performance indicates the need for
       reevaluation of the GC-NPO  system.  A GC-NPD chromatogram
       generated  from the  analysis of the  instrument  QC  standard is
       shown in Figure 1.   The sensitivity requirements  are set  based
       on the EDL published in this  method.   If the laboratory  EDL
       differs from that  listed  in this method,  concentrations  of  the
        instrument QC standard compounds must be adjusted to be com-
        patible with the laboratory EOL.   An  instrument QC standard
        should be analyzed with each sample set.

  10.10  ANALYTE CONFIRMATION - When doubt  exists over the  identification
        of  a  peak on the chromatogram, confirmatory techniques such as
        mass  spectrometry  or a second gas  chromatography column must be
        used.   A  suggested confirmation column is described in Table 1.
                                     IS

-------
   10.11 ADDITIONAL QC - It is recommended that the laboratory adopt
         additional quality assurance practices for use with this
         method.   The  specific practices that are most productive depend
         upon  the  needs of the laboratory and the nature  of the  samples.

1.  PROCEDURE

    11.1   SAMPLE EXTRACTION

          11.1.1  Add preservative  to any samples  not  previously preserved
                   (Section 8.2).   Pipet 50..mL of water sample into a 60-mL
                   bottle containing 1.5 g of ammonium chloride and 25 g of
                   potassium fluoride.  Close bottle and shake vigorously
                   until salts are dissolved.  Spike sample with  5 uL of
                   the  surrogate standard spiking solution.

           11.1.2   Pour contents of bottle onto Extrelut. column.  Allow the
                   column to stand undisturbed for 15  min.

           11.1.3   Add  5 mL of  1000 ug/mL DTT  in ethyl  acetate  to a  K-D
                   concentrator tube  equipped  with a 500-mL flask.

           11.1.4   Add  400 mL  cf  methylene chloride  in 50-75 mL portions  to
                   the  Extrelut column and collect the eluant in the K-D
                •   apparatus  (Section 11.1.3).  The  water, ammonium
                   chloride  and potassium fluoride remain on the Extrelut
                   column while the ETU is removed from the column in the
                   methylene chloride eluate.  Discard the Extrelut column.

     11.2  EXTRACT CONCENTRATION

           11.2.1  Add 1'or 2 clean  boiling stones to  the  K-0  apparatus and
                   attach a macro Snyder column.  Prewet  the Snyder column
                   by  adding  about 1  mL of  methylene  chloride  to the  top.
                   Place the  K-0 apparatus  in a 65-70'C water  bath  so  that
                   the K-0 tube  is partially  immersed in  the  hot water,  and
                   the entire lower  rounded surface of the flask is bathed
                   with  hot  vapor.   When the~apparent volume of liquid
                    reaches  S  mL,  remove the K-0 apparatus and allow it to
                    drain and cool  for at least  10 min.

            11.2.2 Reduce the liquid volume in the K-0 tube to  approximat-
                    ely 1 mL by placing the sample extract in a  tube heater
                    at 35-40*C under a stream of nitrogen.  The  tube heater
                    heats the solvent  in the K-0 tube  at  volume  markings
                    between 1 and 10 mL.

            11.2.3 Dilute sample extract to  5 ml with ethyl  acetate;  rinse
                    walls of  K-0 tube while adding ethyl  acetate.   Immed-
                     iately spike sample extract with  50  uL of internal
                     standard  spiking solution.   Agitate  sample extract to
                     disperse  internal standard.   Transfer sample extract to
           .
                                         16

-------
                a GC vial and determine ETU by GC-NPO  as  described  in
                Section  11.3.  Sample extracts should  be  protected  from
                light and analyzed within 24 hours of  extraction.
                Sample extracts can be stored for up to 28 days,  frozen
                at  -10*C and protected from light.

   11.3   GAS  CHROMATOGRAPHY

         11.3.1  Table 1  summarizes  the recommended  GC  operating condi-
                 tions.   Included  in Table  1 are  retention times observed
                 using this  method.   An example  of the  separations
                 achieved using these conditions are shown in Figure 1.
                 Other GC columns, .chromatographic conditions, or
                 detectors may be  used if the  requirements of
                 Section 10.1 are  met.

          11.3.2  Calibrate the system daily as described  in  Section 9.
                 The standards and extracts must be in ethyl  acetate
                 containing  1000 ug/mL DTT.

          11.3.3   Inject  2 uL of the  sample extract.  Record the resulting
                  peak  size  in  area  units.

          11.3.4   The  width  of  the retention time window used to make
                  identifications  should  be  based upon  measurements of
                  actual  retention time variations of  standards over the
                  course  of  a day.   Three times  the standard deviation of
                  a retention time can be used to calculate  a suggested
                  window size for  a  compound.   However, the  experience of
                  the analyst should weigh heavily in  the  interpretation
                  of chromatograms.

           11.3.5   If the response for the peak exceeds the working  range
                  of the system, dilute the extract with  ethyl  acetate
                  containing 1000 ug/mL OTT and  reanalyze.

12.   CALCULATIONS  -- Calculate  the ETU concentration  in the sample from the
     ETU  relative  response (RRa) to  the internal  standard using  the
     calibration curve  described in  Section 9-.Z.2.

13.   PRECISION AND ACCURACY

     13.1  In a single laboratory, ETU recoveries from reagent water were
           determined  at  five concentration  levels.   Results were used to
           determine the  ETU £01 and demonstrate method range.  EDI and
           method  range data are given in Table  2.

     13.2  In a single laboratory, ETU recoveries from two artificial
           ground waters were determined  at one concentration level.
           Results were used to demonstrate applicability  of the  method to
           different ground water matrices.  ETU recoveries  from  the two
           artificial matrices are given  in Table 3.
               »    *     *             *
                                       17

-------
13.3  In a single laboratory,  ETU recoveries  from  a  ground water
      preserved with mercuric  chloride were determined  0,  14,  and 28
      days after spiking the sample with ETU.   Sample  extracts were
      also reanalyzed after they were stored  for 28  days at -10*C and
      protected  from light.  Results were used to  predict expected £TU
      stability  in ground water samples and  sample extracts;  ETU
      recoveries from the preserved, spiked  ground water samples and
      stored  extracts, are given in Table 4.
                                      18

-------
REFERENCES

1.  ASTM Annual  Book of Standards, Part 11, Volume 11.02,  03694-82,
    "Standard  Practice  for  Preparation of Sample Containers and for
    Preservation",  American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadel-
    phia,  PA,  p. 86,  1986.

2.  "Carcinogens -  Working  with Carcinogens," Department of Health,
    Education, and  Welfare, Public Health  Service, Center for Disease
    Control,  National  Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
    Publication No. 77-206, Aug.  1977.

 3.   "OSHA Safety and Health Standards,  General  Industry,"  (29 CFR  1910),
    Occupational Safety and Health  Administration, OSHA 2206,  (Revised,
     January 1976).

 4.   "Safety in  Academic Chemistry Laboratories,"  American  Chemical Society
     Publication, Committee on Chemical Safety,  3rd Edition,  1979.

 5.   ASTM Annual  Book of Standards,  Part 11, Volume 11.01,  03370-82, "Stan-
     dard Practice  for  Samplina Water,"  American Society  for Testing and
     Materials,  Philadelphia, PA,  p. 130,  1986.

 6".  Mitz,  S., Moz,  P.  and  P. Korte, "A Capillary Gas-Liquid Chromatographic
     Method for Determination of  Ethylenethiourea and Propylenethiourea  in
     Hops,  Beer, and Grapes," J.  Agric.  Food Chem., 1982,  30, 593-596.
                                           19

-------
      TABLE 1.  PRIMARY AND CONFIRMATION CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
                                    Retention Time,  cnin
Analyte
Primary column
                                                 Confirmation  column
ITU
THP (internal standard)
PTU (surrogate standard)
3.5
5.1
2.7
4.5
5.0
2.2
Primary conditions:
               Column:

          Carrier gas:
           Makeup gas:
        Detector  gases:
  Injector temperature:
  Detector temperature:
      Oven temperature:
                Sample:
              Detector:

Confirmation  conditions:
                          10 m long x 0.25 mm  I.D. OB-Wax bonded fused
                          silica column  (J&W), 0.25  m  film thickness
                          He @ 30 cm/sec  linear  velocity
                          He @ 30 mL/min  flow
                          Air 
-------
        TABLE 2.   RESULTS  FROM  EOL AND METHOD  RANGE  STUDIES (a)
Spiking
Level ,
ug/L
5.0
10
25
100
Amt in
Blank,
P9/L
0.492 '
HO (b)
NO
NO


n(d)
7
7
7
7


R(e)
97 (c)
102
94
97


S(f)
0.845
0.886
1.31
5.96


RSO(g)
17
9
6
6


EDL(h)
5.0
-
-
-
(a)   Studies  conducted  in  reagent water; average  recovery of PTU
     surrogate from seven  spiked reagent water  samples was 100%
     (RSO was 8.5%).
(b)   NO = not detected.
(c)   .Data corrected for amount  detected  in  blank.
(d)   n = number of recovery data  points.
(e)   R = average percent recovery.
(f)   S - standard deviation.
(g)   RSO = percent relative standard deviation.
(h)   EDL = estimated detection limit in sample in  ug/L;  calculated by
     multiplying standard deviation (S) times the students'  t  value
     appropriate for a 99% confidence level and  a standard  deviation
     estimate with  n-1 degrees of freedom, or level of compound in
     sample  yielding a peak in the final extract with signal-to-noise
     ratio of approximately 5, whichever value  is higher.
                                    21

-------
          TABLE 3.  RESULTS FROM MATRIX  EVALUATION STUDIES (a)



                         . Amt  in
                          Blank,
Matrix                      ug/L   •      n(e)    R(f)      S(g)    RSO(h)


Hard  (b)                      HO (d)          7      93    0.372         e,

Organic-contaminated  (c)      NO        •     7      93    0.253         3
 (a)   Samples were  spiked with at the 10  ug/L level with  ETU.
 (b)   Absopure Natural  Artesian Spring Water obtained  from the Absopure
      Water Company in  Plymouth Michigan.
 (c)   Reagent water spiked  with fulvic acid at the  1 mg/L  concentration
      level.  A wel1-characterized  fulvic acid, available  from the
      International Humic  Substances  Society  (associated with the United
      States Geological Survey in  Denver, Colorado), was used.
 (d)   NO = not detected.
 (e)   n = number of recovery data  points.
 (f)   R = Average  percent recovery.
 (g)   S = standard deviation.
 (h)   RSD =  percent relative standard deviation.

-------
         TABLE 4.  RESULTS FROM PRESERVATION  STUDY
Extraction Date
Day 0
Day 0
Day 14
Day 28
Analysis Date
Day 0
Day 28 (c)
Day 14
Day 28
R(a)
86
87 r
80
45
RSD(b)
2
2
6
10
(a)  R = percent recovery; average  of  triplicate  analyses.
(b)  RSO = percent relative standard deviation  of triplicate
     analyses.
(c)  Sample extract stored for 28 days at  4*C  and protected
     from 1ight.
                                23

-------
              o

              a
               =3
               CT
               CJ
C
cz.
           32
                              T3 JO
                              0 O
                             T3 T3
                              C. C
                              o o

                        o    c  c
                              CJ  O
                        C    -
                                               O"
                                               O
   «/> i




   JC  


   CJ  —>
   -C  JC


   •—  o o

   JC     -J
       ti_  o
                                                            O *0 JC
                                                            C.    -J
                                                                               CJ
                                                                               a.
                                                                               o
                                O  O
                          <-3    1_ —
                          O    -O JC
                          I-    >*-J
                          =    JC  O
                          o    fo  c

                          J=    -J T3
                          ^ J     QJ *^_
                                H-  e
                                                            CJ
                                                            JC
                                                                   O
                                                           o -*:
                                                               «S T3
                                                           -J  O O
                                VO
                                    o.
                                     t
                                    CVI
                            VI
                            C
                            CJ
                                 CJ

                                 c
                                 fO
                                 e

                                 o
                                  o
                                  ex
                                 u
                                 I
                                  o

                                 JC
                                 <_>
                                               O
                                              —
                                               »0
                                              «_>
                                                O

                                                O
     O     rz
     W. O ^~
    «— JC  S
        -J  »J
     o    —
    JC *«  «C
    -J — <_)

    Vi_ ^-»
     O  o —
      ^-JC  O
I     jT C7> O.     •
   •o

    Sr

   JK:
    •V
    CJ   •

      CM

—>JC  O

—     3
                                                 •     u.     
                                                u_    a.     cj vi u.    cu     cj —
                                                CO           JC •«-» O           J=  CJ
                                                a.           jt — o.            X jc
                                                                    24

-------
c
o
~J
oo



*z
c
l_
o
•J
 c
                                                               a
              I  1 I  I I I • . . . J • . • • J • . . .  ! . • I ' [ • • • •  I
                           25

-------
lx   «
                                              r  8
                                              L  ri
                                              r"-
ex
O

o
                                                             <-_! cx
                                                             C. O
                                                             <_) on


                                                             el

                                                             G ^
                                                             «-J <
                                                             t/1 UJ
                                                             :2 c.

                                                             on Q

                                                             O <


                                                             < cT
                                                              => on
                                                             C* Q.
                            26

-------
                                                    Appendix C
                                                    Revision No. 4
                                                    Date: December 1989
                                                    Pagel of 11
                    APPENDIX C

DATA FLOW (REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING)

-------
                     CPDDE REPRESENTATION OF DATA FLOW



 1.  Samples are taken in the field.

 2.  Samples are iced and shipped to the laboratory.

 3.  Laboratory prepares and analyzes -field samples along with. QC sanples.

 4.  laboratory enters, field and QC data on a ocnpiter in "sets" and it
    enters instrument control  standard data in a separate file.

 5.  Laboratory creates an ASCII file  of the data using the specified formats
    on an IEM PC  compatible floppy disk.

 6.  Laboratory sends the floppy disk  to Christopher Frebis at the EPA in
    Cincinnati, Ohio.

                      26  W. Martin Luther King Drive
                      Cincinnati,  OH  45268

NOTE:   The maximum time from item 1 to item 6 is two (2) months.

 7.   Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC)  personnel transfer the data from PC
     to IBM 3090 mainframe in North Carolina (or possibly to  IEM  Logical
     Mainframe in Cincinnati).

 8.   The data is edited on the mainframe and then checked for compliance
     with QC requirements using SAS, a statistical programming language.

 9.   A hard copy of the edited data, with "suspect" data highlighted, is
     sent to the technical monitor for their review.

 10.  The technical monitor returns the data to C. Frebis with comments,
     deletions, etc. — this is the final data.

 11.  The data  is re-edited per the technical monitor's review and a SAS data
     set is created for the data.

 12.  The "approved" field samples!  are sent to  ICF for their analyses.

 13.  All QC data  is retained by C. Frebis to generate a QC report at the end
     of the survey and to write monthly reports to Dave Munch.

-------
                         NOTES ON NFS DATA POEMATS



 1. Hie format for any date is mm/dd/vy

      A missing date should be entered 01/01/60

 2. Hie format for any time is hh:mra in military time

      A missing time should be entered 00:00

 3. Any other data that is missing should be entered with a period (.)

 4. The number of decimal places should be as follows:

      Concentration         3  (significant digits)
      Percent Recovery      1
      Internal Standard     0
      Instrument Controls    2
      pH                    1
      Temperatures          0
      Volumes               0

. 5.  The codes for Column are as  follows:

       Primary'         PRIM
       Confirmatory     CONF
       Third            GCMS

 6.  The codes for lab are as follows:

       ISO              .                          TSD
       OPP                                        OPP
       WERL                                       WER
       Radian                                     PAD
       Battelle                                  BCD
       James M. Montgomery                        JMM
       Alliance                                  AIL
       Environmental Sciences and Engineering     ESE


 7. The codes for Type are as follows:

       Field Sample                SAMP
       Shipping Blank              SBLK
       Method Blank                MBLK
       Lab Control Standard         I£S@
       Lab Spike  Sample            LSS6I
       Time Storage for Extract     HTE@
       Time Storage for Sample      HZS@

    where 6 is the mix letter (A,B,C or D)
     and  # is the spiking level  (1,2 or 3)

-------
                     NOTES ON NPS DATA. FORMATS  (cont.)
 8.  There should be at least one blank line between samples in the NPS data
    file.

 9.  The codes for  Concentrations and Percent  Recoveries are as follows:
       Not Analyzed *
       Not Detected (< MiniJtum Reporting Level)               -999
       Saturated                                             -777
       Other                                                 -333
       Below Report Lunit,  but Distinct Peak                 -111

       Above Reporting Lunit,  but not Quantified             f 888

10. If a reported value is greater than (>) some number in the NPS instrument
    control data, then use a minus sign (-) instead of >

-------
               REVISIONS TO FORMAT FOR NFS DATA FILES
Format for National Pesticide Survey (NPS) Data
                               v
  Line     Column          Revision

   11       52-62    t     Revised "Enter Internal Standard" to "PERCENT
                           RECOVERY OF  INTERNAL STANDARD AS COMPARED
                           AGAINST THE  CALIBRATION STANDARD".

Motes  on NPS  Format

   4)   Revised  "Internal Standard 0 (area  count)" to
                  Internal Standard 1 (percent recovery)

   9)   - 999 - revised to denote "Not Detected (< 1/2 MRL)"

        - Ill - revised to denote ">  1/2 MRL but < MRL"

-------
                      TABLE 1: USES OF DATA. OOOES IN NFS

                                 SAMPLE TYPE

SAMP
.(a)
— ill (^)
-333 <0)
-444 (J)

-666(9)
-777 (h)
888 (f )
-999 (?)
ooncW

MBLK
.(a)
— ill (^)
-333(d)
****
-555 (*>
****
-777W
sss a
-999 UJ
concW

SBLK
.(a)
••ill (^)
-333(0)
-444 W
-555 (f)
•-666(9)
888 (*)
-SsSo)
concW

ICS
.W
****
****
****
-* j-^^~
•J M H IV
****
-777 W
. ****
****
%rectt)
LSS,DIS
HIE, HIS
.(b)
****
-333(0)
-444 («)
****
****
-777 W
****
****
% reed)
(a) Analyte drunjed from survey (Daaeton-S and Carboxin sulfoxide)  or not
    analyzed on the second column or in GCMS analysis.

(b) Analyte not in mix.

(c) Analyte's concentration between MRI/2 and MRL.   (If no 'confirmation is run,
    a ounmtit as to why should be made.)

(d) A lab mishap, e.g. sample lost during extraction, or sample dropped,  or
    a QC failure which causes the entire sample to be lost and no data
    reported. This is a unique situation.  (A cauiaait should give further
    explanation.)

(e) This analyte fails QC in this set (e.g. ICS out  of  control)  and therefore
    cannot be reported; however,  the analyte does not require a qualitative
    challenge. This code also applies to any spike sample in a set  where
    the ICS is out of control.

(f) GCMS only:  Sent to referee lab for GCMS analysis.

(g) This analyte falls QC in this set (e.g. positive method blank)  and
    therefore cannot be reported; however, the analyte  does require a
    qualitative challenge.

(h) Analyte was saturated.  Should be diluted and re-done, if observed in a
    field sample.  (Another sample with the exact same  header information
    should appear, analytes not saturated in the original sample should be
    reported as ., and saturated analytes should be  reported as their
        entration.)
(i)  Positive, can occur in two fashions:  1)  any analyte in C5CMS analysis;  or
    2)  a qualitative only analyte on either of the first two columns.

(j)  Analyte's concentration below MRI/2.

(k)  Concentration above MRL for quantitative analytes,  reported to three
    significant figures.

(1)  Percent recovery, reported to one decimal place (even if recovery  is 0.0%).

-------
                -333
                               NFS DATA REPORTING CODES  (cont.)

                            Sarrcole (Qualitative onlv analvte)
-999            888
                                           -333    -999
                       PRIM



                       CCNF
                                                 -333   -555   -999    888     GCHS
                                                                               GCMS
                                                                            (at referee)
               -333   -999    888
                    Samole (Quantitative analvte with OC failure)
                    -333
    -444
-666
                                               -333    -666    -999
                                               -333  -555 •  -999   888
                                               -333  -999    888
PRIM
                                             CONE-
                                             GCMS
                                                                             (at referee)
                    Sample (Quantitative an^lvt*-* with no OC faj^VT?)

                  -Ill      -333    -; -777a     -999       cone
               -333  -999   00«:
                          PRIM



                          CCNF
-333 -555 -999 888  -333 -555 -999  888    -333 -555 -999 888  -333 -555 -999  888   GCK5
             -111   -333   -999   cone
-333 -999  888      -333 -999  888
      -333 -999  888
      -333 -999  888       GCMS
                       (at referee)
      a = Dilute and reanalyze

-------
                  DMA CHECKS PERFORMED ON NFS DATA BY CSC
1.  Is the  instrument control standards's signal to noise ratio greater than
    the limit the method specifies?

2.  Is the  instrument control standard's peak symmetry factor within the
    limits  set by the method?

3.  Is the  instrument control standard's peak geometry factor within the
    limits  set by the methods?

4.  Is the  instrument control standard's resolution within the limits set by
    the method?

5.  Is the  date  from sampling to receipt within the limits set by the survey
    requirements?

6.  Is the  date  from sampling to eictract within the limits set by the survey
    requirements?

7.  Is the  date  from extract to analysis within the limits set by the survey
    requirements?

8.  Is the percent recovery of  the surrogate within the limits set by the
    survey requirements?

9.  Is the concentration  of a blank above the reporting limit?

10.  Is the concentration  of a field sample  above the reporting limit?

       A. If so, is there a confirmation analysis  for the analyte?

        B. Is the concentration of the confirmatory column within the limits
           set by survey requirements?
11.  Is the internal standard within the limits set by the method requirements?

12.  Is the percent recovery of each analyte in the lab control standard within
     the limits set by the survey requirements?

13.  Is the percent recovery of each analyte in the lab. spike sample within
     the limits set by the survey requirements?

-------
             FORMAT FOR NATIONAL PESTICIDE SURVEY (NFS) DATA.
CME  QQII3MNS     DESCRIPTION

L       1-9       Well I.D.
       13-20     Date_Sam
       23-30     Date_Shp
       33-40     Date_Rec
       43-50    • TimeTsam
       53-60     Tiioe_Ioe
          [FOR MEIHODS 5 AND 9 ONLY]
       64-65     pH

2       1-10     enter WELL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
       13-20     enter DATE SAMPLED
       23-30     enter DATE SHIPPED
       33-40     enter DATE RECEIVED
       43-50     enter TIME SAMPLED
       53-60     enter TIME ICED
          [FOR MEIHODS 5 AND 9 ONLY]
       63-66     enter pH

3      BLANK

4       1-8       IniJTenp
       11-18      StbJTenp
       21-29      Condition

5       1-8       enter INITIAL TEMPERATURE OF WATER
       11-18      enter STABILIZED TEMPERATURE OF WATER
       21-80      enter -CONDITION OF SAMPLE UPON RECEIPT AT LABORATORY

6      BLANK

7       1-6       Sanp #
        9-11      Lab
        14-18      Set S
       21-28      Date_Spk
        31-38      Date_Ext
        41-48      Date Ana
        51-56      Site f
        59-64      Column

 8       1-6      enter SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
        9-11      enter LAB ABBREVIATION
        14-18      enter SET NUMBER
        21-28      enter DATE SPIKED
        31-38      enter DATE EXTRACTED
        41-48      enter DATE ANALYZED
        51-56      enter SITE NUMBER
        59-64      enter ANALYSIS COLUMN

-------
           FORMAT FOR NATIONAL PESTICIDE SURVEY  (NFS) DATA (cant.)
LINE   COLUMNS

  9     BLANK
 10
 11
  12

  13

  14

  15

  16
 17-?
 1-4
 8-13
16-22
25-31
34-40
43-49
52-60
65-70

 1-5
 8-13
16-22
25-31
34-40
43-49
52-62
65-70

BLANK

 1-8

 1-80

BLANK

 1-7
29-33
39-45
67-71

  1-25
28-34
 39-63
 66-72
           DESCRIPTION
Type
Spiker
Extract
Analyst
Sean Vol
Ext_Vol
Int. Std.
% Surr

enter SAMPLE TYPE
enter SPIKER1 S INITIALS
enter EXTRACTOR'S TNTTIALS
enter ANALYST'S INITIALS
enter VOLUME OF SAMPLE
enter VOLUME OF EXTRACT
enter INTERNAL STANDARD
enter PERCENT RECOVERY OF SURROGATE
 Comments

 enter ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS ON SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
 Analyte
 Cone.
 Analyte
 Cone.

 enter ANALYTE'S NAME
 enter CONCENTRATION, OR PERCENT RECOVERY
 enter ANALYTE'S NAME
 enter CONCENTRATION OR PERCENT RECOVERY

-------
FORMAT FOR NATIONAL PESTICIDE SURVEY (NFS)  INSTRUMENT CONTROL DATA
LINE
1







COLUMNS
1-3
6-11
14-21
24-30
35-37
42-44
49-51
55-58
DESCRIPT]
I ah
Method
Date.Ana
Analyst
S/N '
PSF
PGF
Res.
 2

3-?
BLANK

 1-3
 6-11
14-21
24-30
33-37
40-44
47-51
54-58
              enter IAB ABBREVIATION
              enter METHOD NUMBER
              enter DATE ANALYZED
              enter ANALYST'S INITIALS
              enter SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO
              enter PEAK SYMMETRY FACTOR
              enter PEAK GEOMETRY FACTOR
              enter RESOLUTION

-------
                                                 Appendix D
                                                 Revision No. 4
                                                 Date: December 1989
                                                 Page 1 of 4
                 APPENDIX D

SIGNIFICANT FIGURES AND ROUNDING OF NUMBERS

-------
            SIGNIFICANT FIGURES AND ROUNDING  OF  NUMBERS
1  Introduction

To  obtain  meaningful  data  on  water  quality,  the  sample  collector  must  obtain a
representative sample and then deliver it unchanged for analysis. The analyst must perform
the proper analysis in the prescribed fashion, complete calculations, and convert results to
final form for permanent recording of the analytical data in meaningful, exact terms. These
results are transferred to a storage facility for future interpretation and use.

The following sections discuss processing of actual values, recording and reporting of data in
 the proper way, some means of quality control of data, and the storage and retrieval of data.

 2  The Analytical Value

 3    Significant Figures

 The  term "significant  figure" is used, sometimes rather loosely, to describe a judgment of
 the reportable digits in a result. When the judgment is not soundly based, meaningful digits
 are lost  or meaningless digits are reported. On the other  hand, proper  use of significant
 figures gives an indication of the reliability of the analytical method used.

 Tne following discussion describes the process of retention of significant figures.

  A number is an expression of quantity. A figure or digit is any of the characters 0,  1, 2, 3. A,
  5, 6, 7,  8, 9, which, alone or in combination, serve to express a number. A significant figure
  is a digit that denotes the amount of the quantity in the particular decimal place in which it
  stands.  Reported analytical  values should contain only significant figures. A value is made
  up of significant figures when it contains all digits known to be true and one last digit in
  doubt. For example, if a value is reported as 18.8 mg/1, the 18 must be firm while the 0.8 is
  somewhat uncertain, but presumably better than one of the values 0.7 or 0.9 would be.

  The number zero may or may not be a significant figure depending on the situation.

   Final zeros after a decimal  point are always meant to be significant figures. For example, to
   the nearest milligram, 9.8 g is reported as 9.800 g.

   Zeros before a decimal point with nonzero digits preceding them are significant. With no
   preceding nonzero digit, a zero before the decimal point is not significant.

   If there are no nonzero digits preceding a decimal point, the zeros after the decimal point
   but preceding other nonzero digits are not significant. These zeros only indicate the position
   .of the  decimal point.

   Final  zeros  in  a whole  number  may or  may  not be  significant.  In  a conductivity
   measurement of 1,000 pmho/cm. there is no implication by convention that the conductiv-
   ity is 1,000 ± 1 jimho. Rather, the zeros only indicate the magnitude of the number.

-------
A good measure of the significance of one or more zeros  interspersed  in a number is to
determine whether the zeros can be dropped by expressing the number in  exponential form.
If they can, the zeros may not  be significant.  For example,  no zeros can be dropped when
expressing  a weight of 100.08  g in exponential  form; therefore the zeros are significant.
However, a weight of 0.0008 g can be expressed in exponential form as  8 X 10~4 g, so the
zeros are not significant.  Significant figures reflect the limits in accuracy of the particular
method of analysis. It must be decided whether the number of significant  digits obtained for
resulting values is sufficient for interpretation purposes. If not, there is little that can be
done within the limits of the given laboratory operations to improve these values. If more
significant  figures are needed,  a further improvement in method or selection of another
method will be required.

Once the number of significant figures obtainable from a type of analysis  is established, data
resulting from such analyses are reduced according to set rules for rounding off.

 4     Rounding Off Numbers

 Rounding off of numbers is a  necessary operation in  all analytical areas. It is automatically
 applied by the limits of measurement of every instrument and all glassware. However, when
 it is applied in chemical calculations incorrectly  or prematurely, it can adversely affect the
 final results. Rounding off should be applied only as described in the following sections.

 5      Rounding-Off Rules

 If the figure following  those  to be retained is less than 5, the figure  is dropped, and the
 retained figures are kept unchanged. As an example, 11.443 is rounded off to 11.44.

 If the figure following those to be retained is greater than 5, the figure is dropped, and the
 last retained figure is raised by 1. As an example, 11.446 is rounded off to 11.45.

 If the figure following those to be retained  is 5, and if there are no figures other than zeros
 beyond the five, the figure 5 is dropped, and the  last-place figure retained is increased by
 one if it is an odd number or it is kept unchanged if an even number. As an example, 11.435
 is rounded off to 11.44, while 11.425 is rounded off to 11.42.

 6       Rounding Off Arithmetic Operations

 When a series of numbers is added, the sum should be rounded off to  the same number of
 decimal places as the addend  with the smallest number of places. However, the operation is
 completed with all  decimal   places  intact, and rounding off is done afterward. As an
 example,
  The sum must be rounded off to 33.4.

-------
When one number is subtracted from another, rounding off should be completed after the
subtraction operation, to avoid possible invalidation of the operation.

When two numbers are to be multiplied, all digits are carried through the operation, then
the product is rounded off to the number of significant digits of the multiplier with the
fewer significant digits..

When two numbers are to be divided, the division is carried out on the two numbers using
all digits. Then the quotient  is rounded off to the number of significant digits of the divisor
or dividend, whichever has the fewer.

When a number contains  n  significant digits, its root can be relied on for n digits, but its
power can rarely be relied on for n digits.

 7      Rounding Off the Results of a Series of Arithmetic Operations

 The  preceding rules for rounding off are reasonable for most calculations; however, when
 dealing with  two nearly  equal numbers,  there is a danger of loss of all significance when
 applied to a series of computations that rely on a relatively small difference in two values.
 Examples are calculation of variance and standard deviation. The recommended procedure is
 to carry several extra figures through the calculations and then to round off the final answer
 to the proper number of significant figures.

-------
                                                Appendix E
                                                Revision No. 4
                                                Date: December 1989
                                                Page 1 of 3
                APPENDIX E

STORAGE OF NPS HARDCOPY DATA FILES AT ECL

-------
                STORAGE OF NFS HARDCOPY DATA FILES AT ECL

     The HARDCOPY DATA FILES and all related reports will be filed according
to NPS Method No., and then  by Sample Set.

     ECL has a RECORDS ROOM  available for this purpose.  It is equipped with
shelving for storage, a smoke alarm, and a sprinkler system.  Activation of
the snoke alarm is monitored 24  hours a day by the NSTL fire department which
can respond within 2 minutes to  an alarm.  ECL will take precautions to
protect from sprinkler system water damage all files stored in this room.

     The RECORDS ROOM is also the office of the ECL QAC and is locked when
the room is unoccupied.  Access is limited to the ECL Laboratory Manager, the
ECL QAC and Project/Team Leaders.

     The STORED RECORDS LOG is used to log files  into the RECORDS ROOM
and to record removal and subsequent return of these files.

-------
tn
a
ff
5
u
UJ
Q
UJ
CC
o
I-
•Ji

01
1 1 1
1 1 !
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 01 1 1
1 X 1 1
1 CC 1 I
1 - 1
1 Z 1 CD 1
1 CC 1^1
ID 1 Hi 1
1 )- 1 .u 1
1 Ul 1  1 >. 1
IO 1 Q) 1
IH 14-11
1 UJ 1 <5 1
i cc i a i

O 1 1
1 UJ 1 > 1
1 Z 1 CD 1
1 CC 1^1
ID i ai i
1 t- 1 4J 1
1 UJ 1 * 1
1 CC 1 Q 1
10 1 X 1
1 UJ 1 CO 1
1 > \ ^ I
1 O 1 O 1
1 £ 1 -u 1
1 UJ 1 • 1
1 Z 1 CO 1
1 CC 1 X 1
ID 1 01 1
1 !- 1 4J 1
1 UJ 1 • 1
1 UJ 1 Ok 1.
1 > 1^1
1 O 1 Q 1
IE 1 .u 1
1 UJ 1 <0 1
1 CC 1 O 1
1 _! UJ 1 >. I
1 C CO 1 CD I
1 *- « 1 >. 1
1 t- CC 1 O 1
! ~ a i *j i
1 Z H 1 <6 1
1 — 01 1 O 1
RECORD
IDENTIFICATION
Method/Set No.





















•





































f




























































i
i











i
i


























i
i
i







•















i
i







i
i
















































-------
                                    Appendix F
                                    Revision No. 4
                                    Date: December 1989
                                    Page 1 of 3
 APPENDIX F

DIXON'S TEST

-------
DIXON'S TEST

Dixon's test is used to confirm the suspicion of outliers of a set of data
(for example, control chart data points).  It is based on ranking the data
points and testing the extreme values for credibility.  Dixon's .test is based
on the ratios of differences between observations and does not involve the
calculation of standard deviations.

The procedure for Dixon's test is as follows (from Taylor, 1987):

     1)   The data is ranked in order of  increasing numerical value.  For
         example:

              Xj  < X2 < X3 < ... < Vj < Xa

     2)   Decide whether the smallest, Xlt or the largest, X,,,  is
         suspected to be an outlier.

     3)   Select the risk you are willing to take for false rejection.
         For use in this QAPP we will be using a 5X risk of false
         rejection.

     4)   Compute one of the ratios in Table 1.  For use in this QAPP we
         will be using ratio r22,  since we will  be  using between  20  and
         17 points for the control charts.

     5)   Compare the ratio calculated in Step 4 with the appropriate
         values in Table 2.  If the calculated ratio is greater than the
         tabulated value, rejection may be made with the tbulated risk.
         Fort his QAPP we will be using the 5Z risk values (bolded).

Example (from Taylor)

     Given  the  following  set of ranked data:

         10.45, 10.47, 10.47,  10.48, 10.49, 10.50,  10.50, 10.53,  10.58

     The value  10.58  is suspected of being an  outlier.

     1)   Calculate ru

                       10.58 - 10.53       0.05
              ru  -    	   -   	   - 0.454
                       10.58 - 10.47       0.11

     2)   A 5X risk of false rejection (Table 2), rn - 0.477

     3)   Therefore there is no reason to reject the value 10.58.

     4)   Note that at a 10X risk of false rejection ru - 0.409,  and the  value
         10.58 would be rejected.

-------
                                  TABLE  1




                           CALCULATION OF RATIOS
For use if if Xn is
Ratio n is between suspect
_ o 7 	
rio J - /
m ° iu
(Xn - X2)
/Y Y 'S
(•^a -^n-Z/
_ 11-1^ 	
r21 ii - iJ
(Xn - X2)
_ IA . 95 	
(Xn - X3)
if Xi is
suspect
(X2 - X^)
/Y Y N
\"2 ~ ^l/
(Xn-! - Xx)
av ^
3 " *M/
/Y Y N
\An-l " Al/
/Y Y ^
\A.$ - A.^}
(Xn-2 * Xi)
Note that for use in this QAPjP ratio r22 will be used.

-------
                                   TABLE 2
              VALUES  FOR USE WITH  THE DIXON TEST  FOR OUTLIERS

                                        Risk of  False Rejection
   Ratio          a          P_5Z           IX            5%           10%
3
4 .
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
0.994
0.926
0.821
0.740
0.080
0.725
0.677
0.639
0.713
0.675
0.649
0.674
0.647
0.624
0.605
0.589
0.575
0.562





0.988
0.889
0.780
0.698
0.637
0.683
0.635
0.597
- 0.679
0.642
0.615
- 0 . 641
0.616
0.595
0.577
0.561
0.547
0.535
0.524
0.514
0.505
0.497
0.489
0.941
0.765
0 „ 642
0 .. 560
0 . 507
0.554
0 . 512
0.477
0.576
0.546
0.521
0.546
0.525
0.507
0.490
0.475
0.462
0.450
0.440
0.430
0.421
0.413
0.406
0.806
0.679
0.557
0.482
0.434
0.479
0.441
0.409
0.517
0.490
0.467
0.492
0.472
0.454
0.438
0.424
0.412
0.401
0.391
0.382
0.374
0.367
0.360
Note that for this QAPjP the 5Z risk level will be used for ratio r22-

-------
Reference:
     John K.  Taylor,  Quality Assurance  of Chemical Measurements. Lewis
     Publishers,  Chelsea,  MI,  1987.

-------
                                            Appendix G
                                            Revision No. 4
                                            Date: December 1989
                                            Page 1 of 6
             APPENDIX G

ADDITIONAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS

-------
                                  QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA FORM
                                      NFS GROUND VftTER
Sampling Date(s)
                                                                       Method
Arrival Date(s) at ECL
                                                                       Set No

Set Composition
sample vol. (ml) sample vol. (ml)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.








9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
                                Standards and Set  Controls Data

                                     Name / Date of Std.  Used   Amt. Spiked   Initials
    Method Blank
    LCS
    LCS
    LSS
    LSS
    LSS
    LSS
    LSS
    LSS
    LSS
    Surrogate
«**
***
STOP!! . Has Sanple Control Record been completed for both distribution and
         return of samples?
       . Has Set Composition Form been attached?                           ~
       . Has ECL/NPS Sample Tracking Form been attached?
     Signature:
                                              Date:

-------
   Procedure

   Column
   Extraction
   Accomplished
    Sample  Preparation

    Initials of  Bnployee(s)
    Doing Wbrk	
          Comments
   Date Begun:
                                        GC Analysis
           Analyst(s):
    Internal  Std.  Spike  Data:
         Spiked By:
                      Date:
        Name / Date of Std. Used:
    I.D. of  Instrument  Used  for Analysis:
    1.

    2.

    3.
4.

5.

6.
      Analysis Dates

7.             10.

8.             11.

9.             12.
                              Date Completed:
                              Amt.  Used:
13.

14.

1.5.
16.
    STOP! l   .  Is GC work complete?
            .  Have NPS Data Report  Forms on each sample been completed for each
              GC column?
            .  Has remedial QC work  been carried out with, results attached?
            .  If any sample in this set will be reextracted, list the 9 digit -
              code no. of the sample.
            .  Is any sample in this set a  reextracted sample?
    Signature:
                 Date:
    Data Reviewed By:	

*** Final Disposition of Extracts:_

*** Date of Final Disposition:	
                       Disposition of Extracts:
                                      Date:
                                           Signature:
                                               _ n

-------
                            EXCEPTIONS TO QC REQUIREMENTS

NPS Method	     Set	

State exception, when noticed/  who notified, remedial action required, action taken;
sign and date for each separate incident.

-------
is i







a,
D

j|
"
y
S
^^
Cd























§j
s
1
i2 C OJ
JJ O O  C § o

0) Q
^ §
/rt ^j
3"
. 3
fsH











a rt, „
> c 3 o
d -<-i Cu X


•
5c i|
U -r^ £ X










0) C
« fi
J
& o &3
u JJ Z

•«
•J en

3S




. ti «
fr'B §
353

-------
Extraction Set
                           Extracted
  IKTERXAL 

                                            PSf:   t.«S to 1.16

                                             PCF:   C.«3 to 1.17

      OUBRATIOK STAXOMD ItOBSUTT
         If the iyiUe «• not r^tlibnUo*.   Lerel of Ck SU _
         or is r«ca(ibrmU4 using CM«         Acceptable rang*
         •tandaH*, at feast one previou«ly
         prepared standard tust be  run. t«d    _ U
         ana (7 ted M a taeple, g'tring • result
         vithin  MX of the exp«ct«d value.
                                  Range:
   IKTERKAL STAXOARO AREA
      IS peak area for any saeple tuit                                       Files:
      not deviate by eor« than 7« percent  (Expressed as recovery relative
      froe  the ««in peak area for the       to the eean area of the           Range:
      calibration standards.                calibration standards.)
                                   Uth Blk  file Mo.

                                    A*t of ETU found


                                    Inst 9.C file Ho.
PSF

PCF
                                     Ck sU file Ko.
                                      Result
                                                             Coetents
 CQKTRQL CHARTS                         Control Chart ________________ LCS fit* Ko.  _
    ETU recovery fro* the US and PTU
    recovery fro. the US or Vth Blk     PTU tUiU	U	  PW ( US / BUC )
    •ust be vithin the 3 SU lieit*
    of the current control chart.        ETU lieiU	U	  ETU	xie«/9«
  Alert condition* occur  «h«n:
                                                               pass
             fail
                                                                pass
                                                                fail
                  pass     fait
                   pass

                   pass

                   pass
                                                                              fail

                                                                              fail

                                                                              fail
                    pass     fail
                                                                                                                          
-------
                                       Appendix H
                                       Revision No. 4
                                       Date: December 1989
                                       Page 1 of 3
       APPENDIX H

ECL COMPUTER PROGRAMS

-------
BASIC PROGRAM:  REGVftR

MAR 23,  1983   15:43:27

5REM***REGVAR, WRITTEN FOR ECL BY UWD,  OCT 1,1 98e
10LETN=T=C1=C2=D1=D2=0
20PRIHT"ENTER COMPOUND NAME";
30DIMAJ C403
35DIMUC100]
36DIHPC1003
37DIMXC1003
38DIMDC1003
39DIMGC100J
40IHPUTA*
50PRINT"ENTER -1 AFTER YOUR LAST DATA POINT"
60FORIMT030
7SPRINTI
S0PRINT"ENTER YOUR VALUE FOR X";
90INPUTUCI3
100IFUCI]=-1THEH150
110LETH=H+1
120PRINT-EMTER YOUR  VALUE FOR Y ";
130INPUTPCH
140HEXTI
150PRINT
lb0PRIHT"ARE ALL VALUES  CORRECT?  ";
170INPUTB*
180IFB**"Y"THEN26e
190PRINT"EHTER THE NUMBER OF THE  PAIR  IN  ERROR";
200INPUTI
216PRINT"EHTER THE CORRECT X";
220INPUTUCI]
230PRINT"ENTER THE CORRECT YM;
240INPUTPCIJ
250GOT0160
26QFORI=1TON
270LETC1=C1+UCI]
 290LETDl*Dl+Ptn
 300LETD2«D2+
 310NEXTI
 330LETY=jXCI];TAB<33);DCI];
 5I0PRINTTRB<48>;Gm
 520LETT-T+CCI3
 530NEXTI
 540PRINT"THF SUM OP T1TFF-2 IS  "

-------
5S0PRINT
576PRINT
580LETZ = 2M
598GOT0420
6000UTDVC"T1",E
610PRINTMNPUT A V VALUE. USE A -1 TO EMU THE OPERATION."
620INPUTT
630IFT=-1THEN72G
e40LETV=<-S
650PRINT"YOUR X VflLUE IS "V
£60PR1NT"YOUR V VflLUE IS "T
6700UTDVC"L1",E
680PRINT
690PRINT"YOUR X VflLUE IS "V
700PRINT"YOUR Y VALUE IS "T
7ieGOT0600
720PRINT
7300UTDVC"T1",E
748IFL$="MfiNY"THEMlG
75ePRIHT"IF YOU HflVE SEVERAL GROUPS AND WOULD LIKE  TO OMIT";
76QPRINT"THE NEXT QUESTION, ENTER MANY INSTEAD OF Y OR  N. "
770PRINT
780PRINT-DQ YOU WANT TO  ENTER ANOTHER GROUP''  < Y.'N-'MflHY) "
790INPUTLJ
8001FL**"MANY"THEN 10
810IFL$="Y"THENie
320EHD

END OF  FILE

-------
                                           Appendix I
                                           Revision No. 4
                                           Date: December 1989
                                           Page 1 of 6
          APPENDIX I

RAPID REPORTING NOTIFICATION

-------
r
      5    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                              CINCINNATI. OHIO 45268
   MEMORANDUM

   DATE:     April 12, 1988

   SUBJECT: NFS Rapid Reporting System

   FROM:     David J. Munch, Chemist
            Drinking Water Quality Assessment Branch

   TO:      NFS Technical Monitors
       Jerry Kotas has requested that any confirmed results of health
   significance be reported as quickly as possible.  Therefore, if an analyte
   listed in the attached tables is observed in the primary analyses, at or
   above the rapid reporting limit, the.following actions should be
   instituted.  For any  listed analyte where the rapid reporting level  is
   less than or equal to 1/2 the minimum reporting level  (MRL), any
   occurrence at or above 1/2 the MRL should also be processed as below.
   (Note:  The procedures for determining the occurrence  of NFS analytes that
   may occur below the MRL, and are not listed on the attached tables,  have
   not yet been finalized.)

       1.   The appropriate confirnational  analyses  (GC/MS  for methods  1-3,
            6-7, second  column for Method 5) should be performed as  soon as
            practical.

       2.   The laboratory  should  telephone their Technical Monitor, the same
            day the confirmation  is  completed.

       3.   The laboratory  should immediately  document  the  observed result in
            a  letter  to  their  Technical Monitor.

       4.   As quickly as possible on the day  the  above  telephone  call is
            received  from the  laboratory,  the Technical  Monitor  should inform
             their Laboratory Analytical Coordinator of  the finding.  The
            Technical Monitor  should forward on to the  Laboratory Analytical
             Coordinator the above documentation,  with any comments he/she may
            have concerning the validity of the result.

        5.   The Laboratory Analytical Coordinator should inform Jerry Kotas
             and the second Analytical Coordinator of the finding by telephone
             the sane day if possible, and in writing after the documentation
             is received from the Technical Monitor.

        6.   The Analytical Coordinators are to request,  through the
             appropriate Technical Monitors, that all analyses for this sample
             site be conducted, and reported in writing,  as soon as  practical.

-------
                                    -2-
    If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please let Bob
Maxey or me know.  Also,  please pass on this information to your contract
and referee laboratories.  They will need to have this information in hand
prior to their conducting the dry run.

Attachment       -   '•

Addressees:

    A. Dupuy
    L. Kamphake
    C. Madding
    R. Maxey
    R. Sorrell
    R. Thomas
 cc:
     J.  Kotas
     H.  Brass
     A.  Kroner
     J.  Orme

-------
                 METHOD 16






    ANALYTE	          RAPID REPORTING LEVEL




ethylene thiourea               1.05 ug/L

-------
                                                                                  BSL
                            NFS RAPID REPORTING NOTIFICATION
                                  NPS METHODS 1,3 AND 6
Date:
Set No.:
NPS Field Sample No.:,

BSL Lab. I.D. No.:
                                     METHOD 1
ANALYTE





Rapid
Reporting
Level (ppb)





Analytical Results
Primary GC Column
(PPb)




•
Secondary GC Column
(ppb)





GC/MS
(pos. or neq. or N/F





                                      METHOD 3
ANALYTE





Rapid
Reporting
Level (pcb)





Analytical Results
Primary GC Column
(PPb)





Secondary GC Column
(PPb)





GC/MS
(pos., neg., or N/R





   NOT ANALYZED

-------
                                       METHOD 6
ANALYTE





Rapid
Reporting
Level (ppb)





Analytical Results
Primary QC Column
l- (ppb)





Secondary GC Column
(ppb)




%
GC/MS
(pos. or neq. or N/





* —
  = NOT ANALYZED
QA Assessment:
     Is there any QC problera(s)  with the set or the sample for either Method that may
     adversely impact the identification or quantitation of the above analytes? If yes,
     describe.
                                                              R. Maxey, Project Leader

-------
                                               Appendix J
                                               Revision No. 4
                                               Date: December 1989
                                               Page 1 of 2
               APPENDIX J

GC/MS CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR METHOD 6

-------
El CHARWTTERISTIC IONS FOR BTO

I
1 Analy te
1
lETU
1
iMethod *
1
I 6
1
I Amt. Injected
1
I 100 ng
El Characteristic -Ions m/z
M.W.
'
102
1
Primary |
I
102 |
2nd
73
3rd
72

-------
                                                   Appendix K
                                                   Revision No. 4
                                                   Date: December 1989
                                                   Page 1 of 6
                   APPENDIX K

ADDENDA TO METHOD 3 - JUNE 1988 TO DECEMBER 1989

-------
                                                                            05/01/89
                           Environmental Chemistry Section
                                 Addendum - Method 6
Revision to Section 4,  page 1,  paragraph  1, sentence 5

  - Change "Dr.  Y.  A. Yonan, ECL-QAO,  ..."  to "Mr. Danny McDaniel,
    Acting ECS-QAC,"


Revision to  Section 4, page 1, paragraph 2,  sentence 1

  - Delete first two sentences.

  - Add "Dr. Christian Byrne and Mr. Stanley Mecomber will handle sample
     preparation/ analysis,  data handling and reporting."


 Revision to Section 4, page 1, paragraph 2, sentence ?.

   - Change.". .  .  Mr. George Sand." to ". .  .  Mr. Henry Shoemaker"

 Revision to Section 4, Figure 4-1  - ECS  ANALYTICAL TEAM - Method 6

   - Delete ECS  ANALYTICAL TEAM diagram from  Figure 4-1.

   - Replace with revised diagram on following page.
                                      Approved
                                                 EPA/ECS-NPS Project L#der/
                                                 PCS Analytical Coordinator
                                      Approved
                                       Approved wlf f>j A**, f*J fft^\*  •~~\ajLAfitV
                                                          QACKJDWVSQ

                                       Approved   >£ (L**-~~~**
/
                                                        NFS Director
                                      /73

-------
                                                        Project:  NPS
                                                        Section No: 4
                                                        Revision No: 3
                                                        June 1988
                                                        Page  of
        Sample Custodian

        G. Gardner (EPA)
       Assistant Sample
       Custodians

       J. Cuevas  (EPA)
       S. Mecomber (EPA)
Sample Prep./Ext.

C. Byrne (STI)*
S. Mecomber (EPA)
                                 ECS ANALYTICAL TEAM

                                     METHOD 6
                                  NPS Project Leader

                                    Bob Maxey  (EPA)
       GC  -

C.Byrne (STI)*
S. Mecomber (EPA)
                                       ECS-QAC  (Acting)

                                         D.  McDaniel  (EPA)
                                       Data Review

                                     H. Shoemaker (EPA)
       GC/MS

J. Ferrar io (EP A)
  Data Handling,
  Reporting

C. Byrne (STI)*
S. Mecomber (EP
      Sverdrup Technology Ino; (In-house Contractor for ECS)
      ECS provides overall technical direction to Sverdrup Technology/ Inc.
       FIGURE 4-1:   ECS ANALYTICAL TEAM - MFTHOD 6

-------
                                                            e/12/aa
                   ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY
                          ADDENDUM - METHOD  6


Addition to Section 4, page  1, paragraph 2,  sentence 2

  -Add "Data  review has  been assigned to Mr. George Sand.

Addition  to Section  4," page 1,  paragraph 3

   -Change "NASA/NSTL Bldg. 1105
            NSTL,MS  39529"

                to

            "NASA/SSC Bldg.  1105
            STENNIS SPACE CENTER,  MS 39529-60OO"

 Addition to Section 4,  page 1,  paragraph 4

    -Change "The Assistant Sample Custodian  -for  NPS is:

                   Mr. John Cuevas
                   (601)688-3170  (or  3217)"

                         to

             "The Assistant Sample Custodians -for NPS are:
Mr. John Cuev&s
(601)683-3170 (or 3217)
                                           Mr. Stanley Mecomber
                                            (6OD688-317O (or 3217)
   Figure 4-1 s ECU ANALYTICAL TEAM Mas  revised.  The new chart is
               enclosed.
                                       Approved
                                        Approved
                                               EPA/ECS-NPS Project Lflader
                                               ECS Analytical Coordinator

-------
                                                     Project: NFS
                                                     Section No:  4
                                                     Revision No: 3
                                                     June 1988
                                                     Page  of
     Sample Custodian

     G. Gardner (EPA)
     J. Cuevas  (EPA)
                      'I
    I
                              ECL ANALYTICAL TEAM

                                  METHOD 6

                              I                     I
                              |  NPS Project Leader  |
                              I                     I
                              I   Bob  Maxey (EPA)   \
                           GC
I                     I   I
I  Sample Prep./Ext.   |   |
I                     I   I
|  C.  Byrne  (STI)*     |   |  C.Byrne  (STI)*
I	        I   1	
                     ECL QAC

                     Y.Yonan (EPA)
                                             |    Data Review     j
                                             .1                    I
                                             I  George Sand (EPA)  I
I                       I
I        GC/MS         |
I                       !
I  D.  McDaniel (HR)(EPA)|
I  J.  Ferrario (LR)(EPA)|
  Data .Handling/
  Reporting

C. Byrne (STI)*
*  STI  = Sverdrup Technology Inc.  (In-house Contractor for BCL)
   Sverdrup is providing the ECL severeal person-Years of support.
   ECL  provides overall technical  direction to Sverdrup Technology/  Inc.
   FIGURE 4-1:  ECL ANALYTICAL TEAM - METHOD 6

-------
                                                                        7/21/88
                              Environmental Chemistry Laboratory
                                     Addendum - Method 6
           Addition to Section 2, page 1, Appendix G

             -Add "Internal Quality Control Checklist" below "QC Data Sheet".

             -Add an Appendix "J: GC/MS CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR METHOD  6".



           Addition to Section 5, page 1, number 8, end of paragraph

             -Add "See Appendix J for a table of the three ions  for ETU".



           Addition to Section 9, page 3, below 10.6.1.1

             -Add " *11.1.1  Add preservative to all Method Blanks, Laboratory Control
              Standards, and any Samples not previously preserved (Section 8.2) Pipet
              50 ml	


             -Change "TABLE 5    Sensitivity   Ethylene thiourea (ETU)  0.025"

                                         to

                     "TABLE 5    Sensitivity   Ethylene thiourea (ETU)  0.025 ug/ml"


           Delete Section  11, page  7,  II "a" and make "b" the new "a"

           Addition to Appendices

             -Add internal Quality  Control  Checklist (enclosed)  to end of Appendix G.

             -Add a cover  sheet for Appendix J:  GC/MS CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR METHOD 6.
               (For the appendix contents, see  the enclosed GC/MS Characteristic Ions
              Table.)
                                       Approved
US Environmental Protection Agency

Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th rloor
Chicago, IL  60604-3590

-------