-------
oc
OS
ui
X
O
5.0
4.0
• e 3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
10
FIGURE 12
MOBILE 2
TOTAL EMISSION RATE RANGES
AUTOMOBILES
NOx
gm/VMT
20
30
SPEED
(mph)
40
50
60
A-20
-------
FIGURE 13
17.5
15.0
12.5
tu
CO
CO
§i 10.0
LU
O
7.5
5.0 -
2.5
MOBILE 2
TOTAL EMISSION RATE RANGES
TRUCKS
NON-METHANE HC
gm/VMT
10
20
30
40
50
SPEED
(mph)
-------
FIGURE 14
MOBILE 2
TOTAL EMISSION RATE RANGES
TRUCKS
NOx
gm/VMT
12.0 I-
11.0
I
cc
zP
OS
If 10.0
5,2
IU
ox
9.0
8.0
7.0
J ' 1 1 • '
10
20
30
SPEED
(mph)
40
50
60
A-22
-------
APPENDIX B
DOCUMENTATION OF REASONABLENESS CRITERIA
-------
APPENDIX B
DOCUMENTATION OF REASONABLENESS CRITERIA
The principal sources of information for developing the
reasonableness criteria in Appendix A are included the fol-
lowing reports:
• USDOT. 1974 National Transportation Report,
Urban Data Supplement, 1976=
• Characteristics of Urban Transportation Demand -
A Handbook for Transportation Planners, Wilbur
Smith and Associates for UMTA. UMTA-IT-06-0049-78-1,
April, 1978.
• How to Prepare the Transportation Portion of Your
State Air Quality Implementation Plan, USDQT/FHWA/
EPA/ November, 1978.
Many of the tabulations in Appendix A were derived from
the 1974 National Transportation Report. In most instances,
the only adjustments made to these estimates were the rounding
of published data and the dropping of selected data points
which appeared to be unique .or in error. There are several
reasons for using this source of information: It provides
consistent information for 1372 for urban areas throughout the
nation; and it presents information that is unavailable in
other sources. This reference includes forecasts for 1980 and
1990, but this information is based on planned transportation
investments which may or may not have been implemented between
1972 and 1980.
Several updates were made to selected data items in this
reference:
• In the case of VMT/capita, the 1972 estimates were
updated to 1980 by multiplying by a factor of 1.225.
This factor came from comparing national changes in
total urban VMT and urban population between 1972
and 1979. This information was obtained from the
Highway Statistics reports published by FHWA and
from the Bureau of the Census.
• Average speed for the Interstate system in 1972 was
lowered to reflect the 55 mph speed limit. The
average operating speeds for each remaining func-
tional classification were considered reasonable, as
were the percentages of VMT for each functional high-
way classification.
B-l
-------
Of the tables not derived primarily from the National
Transportation Report, the cold start/hot start fractions
presented the most difficulty. Because of the highly variable
nature in which this parameter can be reported, it was decided
that a single set of ranges for the entire urban area based on
24-hour conditions, was the criteria most readily available from
all urban areas. The ranges were set up using the cold/hot/
stable fractions by time of day from the report, The Determination
of Vehicular Cold and Hot Operating Fractions for Estimating
Highway Emissions in combination with information on fraction of
vehicle travel by time of day contained in the report, Character-
istics of Urban Travel Demand. The combined tables provide the
basis for the daily average of cold/hot/ stable fractions presen-
ted in Table 2.
The emission rate criteria in Figures 3 through 8 were esti-
mated using MOBILE 1. MOBILE 2 was used for Figures 9 through 14.
The assumptions used for each of the model runs are listed below.
• For Figures 3, 4, 9, and 10:
Lower Curve - 80% LDV, 3.0% LDT1, 5.0% LDT2, 4.5% HDG,
7.5% HDD with 43% cold start (catalyst),
27% hot start catalyst, and 30% cold
start (non-catalyst), Temperature 75° F,
humidity 75 grains, no air conditioning,
loading, or trailer correction factors
were used.
Upper Curve - 85% LDV, 4.5% LDT1, 5.5% LDT2, 1.5% HDG,
2.5% HDD, 1% MC with 12% cold start
(catalyst), 7% hot start (catalyst), and
10% cold start (non-catalyst). Tempera-
ture 75° F, humidity 75 grains, no air
conditioning, loading, or trailer correc-
tion factors were used.
• For Figures 5, 6, 11, and 12:
Lower Curve - 99% LDV, 1% MC, Temperature 75° F., 43%
cold start (catalyst), 27% hot start
(catalyst), 30% cold start (non-catalyst),
humidity 75 grains, no air conditioning,
loading, or trailer correction factors
were used.
Upper Curve - 99% LDV, 1% MC, Temperature 75° F, 12%
cold start (catalyst), 7% hot start
(catalyst), 10% cold start (non-catalyst),
humidity 75 grains, no air conditioning,
loading, or trailer correction factors
were used.
B-2
-------
For Figures 7;
8, 13, and 14:
Lower Curve - 0% LDV, 30.2% LDT1, 30.2% LDT2, 23.5%
HD, 16.1% HDD, Temperature 75° F, with
43% cold start (catalyst), 27% hot start
(catalyst), 30% cold start (non-catalyst),
humidity 75 grains, no air conditioning,
loading, or trailer correction factors
were used.
Upper Curve - 0% LDV, 30.2% LDT1, 30.2% LDT2, 23.5%
HDG, 16.1% HDD, Temperature 75° F with
12% cold start (catalyst), 7% hot start
(catalyst), 10% cold start (non-catalyst),
humidity 75 grains, no air conditioning,
loading, or trailer correction, factors
were used.
B-3
-------
APPENDIX C
DEFINITIONS
-------
APPENDIX C
DEFINITIONS
Vehicle Classifications
LDV: All automobiles.
LDT1: Trucks used chiefly for personal transportation which are
powered by gasoline fueled, spark-ignited internal com-
bustion engines, and have a gross vehicle weight (GVW)
of 6000 Ibs. or less.
LDT2: See LDT1, except that vehicles have a GVW between 6000
and 8500 Ibs.
HDG: Trucks and buses having a GVW of over 8500 Ibs., and are
powered by gasoline-fueled, spark ignited internal com-
bustion engines.
HDD: Trucks and buses having a GVW over 8500 Ibs., and which
are powered by diesel engines.
MC: Motorcycles.
Source: Mobile Source Emissions Factors, EPA, 1978, EPA-400/
9-78-006
Highway Functional Classifications
Interstate:
Principal
Arterial:
Minor
Arterial
Collector:
Local:
Source
Any roadway that constitutes a part of The National
System of Interstate and Defense Hignways.
Streets and highways serving major metropolitan
activity centers, the highest traffic volume cor-
ridors, the longest trip desires, and a high propor-
tion of total urban area travel on a minimum of
milleage.
Streets and highways interconnecting with and aug-
menting the urban principal arterial system, and
providing service to trips of moderate length at a
somewhat lower level of travel mobility.
Streets penetrating neighborhoods, collecting
traffic from local streets in the neighborhoods,
and channeling it into the arterial system.
Streets not classified in a higher system, primar-
ily providing direct access to abutting land, and
access to higher systems.
1968 National Highway Functional Classification
Study Manual, USDOT, April, 1969.
C-l
-------
APPENDIX D
EXAMPLES OF COMPLETED WORKSHEETS
-------
-------
Reviewer
Date
iMETHODOLOGY REVIEW SHEET
1. Urban Ana •
2. What agency developed th« has* year HC and NOx emissions inventories for highway sources?
(List agency name, address and telephone number.)
JOOO Ebwtow &ri*e.
3. a) For what base year have the emissions inventories been established?.
b) !f 1C2C is nst tfta ba^s yasr for tiid ofni:uioii rnvtmtorres, indicaia why another year was used.
4. What type of procedure was used to estimate highway emissions? (Check one)
• Link-based procedure *
U - Trip-based procedure *
Q •• Hybrid procedure *
D • Other (Please explain below)
* Section II of this manual describes each of these procedures in more detail.
D-l
-------
5. a) How were VMT and vehide operating speeds estimated for use in developing the emissions inventories?
(e.g. Are the estimates based on traffic counts and travel time surveys or are they based on estimates
from the travel forecasting procedures used for urban transportation planning?)
speeds were develops/ tss/ny J~he (
J
b) Are there any elements of the travel estimation procedures that are questionable?
24- hour -fra-Pf/c assignments tt/ese snack
/Jtf/e, effort- H#S mat/ej-fc accou/* •&<- -the e-PPecte of oral?
c) What year's data was used to calibrate the travel estimation procedures cited in Question 5a?
fo
d) When were the procedures cited in question 5a last validated (i.e., checked to determine rf they can
reproduce observed traffic flows)?
r J977 Mere
1977
A// tesn/car't'San'S MMfe hjrfh/'n i'T'Z tuJ)j/e. -$>*> ni&raJJ G9/ncaif'Sor? -far a//
6. Are estimates of "off-network" VMT (e.g., VMT on links normally not included in a computerized highway
network) accounted for in the highway emissions inventories? If yes, briefly describe how the VMT and
corresponding operating speeds estimates for each travel were determined.
res -
-tables . ~Ssed<^ fire.
\J
D-2
-------
7. a) What procedure was used to estimate mobile source emission factors? (Check one)
^ MOBILE 1
D MOBILE 2
u Other procedure (Enter name of procedure)
b) If "Other" was checked in question 7a, describe and assess the adequacy of the procedure.
8. Based on the above, summarize and briefly discuss any major deficiencies in the travel and emissions estimation
procedures used by this urban area.
d /-thouh -f-rave./ rtfrde/s Ore based osi o& w-£>s/rjg-bon-
/is \/Q//*daJ-s>r/ in /977
-Tar a£\/eJopiney "Hie
' 7
D-3
-------
WORKSHEET 1
TRAVEL DATA FOR REASONABLENESS ASSESSMENT
NAME OF URBAN AREA .
REGION OF COUNTY (SEE FIGURE i
VARIABLE
1. Population
2. Avaraga Daily VMT by
a) Intantata
b) Principal Artariai
d) CaMaeton
a) Local
f) Total
3. Avaraga Daily VMT by
Vanida Oaai ••
a) LOV
•) LOT 1 « 8000 Itaa.)
e) LDT2(>6000lbsJ
d) HOC
•» HOO
') _•»-• Transit
g) Total
OR
h) Auto
i) Truck
j) Total
4. Avow* 0:i!y 3pwsti««
Spaads (24 hrsj by
Functional Cte •
a) Intvrvttta
b) Principal Artariai ?
e) Minor Artariai )
d) CoHaetor 7
a) Local j
OR
?) Avaraaa Daily Saaad
for tha Sywam (wnara-
4WJ atfWI T WVIUOWvJ
5. Avaraga Daily Trip
Lanatii
6. Avaraga Daily Vahida Trips
9| PflaMnfW' VMllCMV
bl Trucks
7. SaMBOffaan AQfUifflVMVIT
Faetor
ESTIMATE FOR BASE YEAR
VALUE UNITS
IJ50
^
87/t>
^,14^
Z373
25<&04
'Zl.fo?
f <*
/30-f
61*
6>1
2530?
5&
40
-£o
12. do
AJ.4.
AJ.4.
1JXW*
IJOTssf
(000)
(000)
(000)
(0001
(0001
(000)
1,000-iof
(000)
(0001
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
(0001
(000)
lOOO)
(000)
tfl HHMB
pawhowr
— M^B
infin
Ifldl
MkaaJat
in|jii
(fl(MI
•BM*4_.
iiipn
minutaa
in 1,000**
(000)
(000)
SOURCE
ftej.'enaJ ianj U'Se. Phf) -frOi?)
/T79 -far Bxst faf /T77.
Trsta*'»t- #///€*>
- iirfe'r*'fate'
~ &fa*abd 5vr-faee *"f"eefe
-C*Htdo<'&k>C*l ***<***
-Pm*t • &<},ai**./ &<• &tj«"'fy af>et
rflaivfejiatxe Ph* , /38O
^lccr»b>»eJ UOnfLCfTi
~ rf)0$£f TH* »•*'£ fa hi 'c./es
•S&frc* • P*»*>r>~i A-* <£•,'«/*•
<^<%/ fflaifrferta'Ke
Pf*»> ft?o
Saw catejtH'ies
as i* so*J 2.
Source: tfeqJon*./ Af @ua//h
and /ffatffesjance
Pfa^J /
f?ey,os><*( L4»ct Ust Pfatn
•fan I f 7? &r "Base for /977
.
//? /97^ a// -favr
Sfa^>or>s cue^e, cszee/
Functional clarifications. sa« Appendix C.
MOBILE 1 vantela classifications. sa« Appendix C.
D-4
-------
NDINGS
-N
C£
C
en
^
-
oc
S
1
***
iu
K
CNT
i i
Q)
.vj
«
|K
=•<
=±
ctf
|5
,
k)
O
UJ
S
i ***
CO
ce.
O
u.
c
o a
UJ
Ul
_J
03
<
E
<
N7
Hi!
o — -~
< I
-------
-
Ed
a
o
a
z
o
Ed
E
en
U
Ed
-
X
Ed
to
O
z
o
Ed
•—•
CS
5
u
ui
S
I
Q
$
m
2
i
(9
Z
i
5,.
S
(M
.J
>.
2
ui
CD
*
*
>i
a _
*
ui
2
UI
a
r-CMCVJr-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
^
T-.-1-T-t-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
^^
Of-^i-OOOQQOOOOOQOQOOO
-?•.
-^
v-t-^-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
O«-T-»-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
\
»
O^COC^OOSr^wlflCOCsj^-r-OOOOOOO
1
\
r-^IC*5^lflCOf*%cOO*®*^ *M.CO ^ 1A
cd z
D-6
-------
WORKSHEET 2c
VARIABLE 12: VEHICLE EMISSION RATES BY FUNCTIONAL CLASS
(GM/VMT)
HiQHWAY
CLASSIFICATION
COMPOSITE
OTOMATI
exmntA
?i»..J or » tor HC
TOTAL AUTO
OMISSIONS
TOTAL TMUCX
EMISSIONS
S5TIMATE
cnnmiA
ESTIMATE
CSITW
«».«or IZtorNOa
INTERSTATE
4-.ZI -
* fT7 r-n
PRINCIPAL AKTEMIAL
MINOft AKTSRIAL
COLLECTOR
rnn
LOCAL
TOTAL
NO>
MA
O. tf.
IfMOMUM wi
If MOBILE 2 MB
D-7
-------
7. a) What procedure was used to estimate mobile source emission factors? (Check one)
% MOBILE 1
" MOBILE 2
[j Other prccadura (Entar nsms of procedure)
b) If "Other" was checked in question 7a, describe and assess the adequacy of the procedure.
8. Based on the above, summarize and briefly discuss any major deficiencies in the travel and emissions estimation
procedures used by this urban area.
rtfnde/s Ore, based ov ote /
m /977
/
D-3
-------
WORKSHEET 3
REASONABLENESS .ASSESSMENT FOR TRAVEL DATA
VARIABLE
13.0aily VMT/Cjprta
14.P«rcant VMT
by function*! CJlSS
a) ImariuM
b) Prineipai Ararial 7
e) Minor Arariai )
d) Coitactor
t) Loot
By Vahfete OM§
•1 LOV
b) LOT « 6000 UM.) I
e) LOT O6000 lb«.l S
dl HOG
•1 HOO
f) >ie — Ts-asr*'!:
OR
g) Aim
hi Trade
1«.Totti VMT
1 7. Vthidt Operating
SpMdby
Functional CJ»«i
•) lllUMIUfa
WHginiiMMJ Avv^viW
rnfiQ^vv Mrorav
e) Minor Artenai
d) Caitoetor
•) Loo*
OR
SyitwnSpMd
l8.Amra»»OaiiyTrip
>-•"«*
1 9. V«flid« Tripe/Capua
a) PwMngir V«hid«t
b) Trade*
2L SMMMi AdiuniMnt
BASE YEAR REASONABLENESS
MEASURES
MEASURE
/*u £ mi/ptr.
34- 5 x
S5:? J
%
9.4*
o-*-v>%
(& *^9 M (V
(X
512 X
Z.5"X
<5. Z X
X
X
1.000 mi/day
S<3
j *°
J 20
J2.3O win.
x
A//^ TrifWtMT.
/f/9 Trip/par.
COMPUTATION
(2fr1«>
(2i42f)
(2b-!2»)
(2d-f2f)
(2e^2fl
(3.438)
(3e43»)
(3» f 3j)
(3I-J3B)
(3h-f3|)
(3143)1
(4eJ
(4.1
(4fl
(5.)
(6a*r1a)
(6b-r1«)
N
CRITERIA
SM TABLE 3
/Z-/7 •"•*«1
SM TAStS -S
(Pwomtl
/^'f3 X
X
X
/7-?7 x *
(Pweant)
7849 X
5-12 X
2J-« X
1JJ-4.5 X
2J-7 J X
-** *
7849 X
10-22 X
5>*J *T, WOflCSHMff I
1.000 mi/dav
SM TABLE 5
!»»M!s?/ftea'!
2ff- *? iS
/5-Z5"2«.*
SM TABLE B
mph
SM TABLE 7
fZ ~ /-^- (minutai)
1*2> Trip«/par.
37:49 Trips/par.
SM TABLE 8
FINDINGS
O.£.
U - L ??>*>* 'L/
~~ ffiati /&»! f» 'Y
J\ U*
' / 1
- lot*/ • C ?)
— ^j jz.. ffi/^~ fo/qh.
1 it
i ^ ffl$
~~ OL K ' lo
,
ax.
,
/'/) "ter^lfei'/S &fd
if- /
tfrferiafe are
O £ but S/'qk'tw
/
hyk
&.£.
—
fJate. -
for %
r ~tc
-from Tab/e 4 HAW. 6eeo
D-8
-------
APPENDIX E
BLANK WORKSHEETS
-------
Reviewer
Date
METHODOLOGY REVIEW SHEET
1. Urban Area
2. What agency developed the base year HC and NOx emissions inventories for highway sources?
(List agency name, address and telephone number.)
3. a) For what base year have the emissions inventories been established?.
b) If 1980 is not the base year for the emission inventories, indicate why another year was used.
4. What type of procedure was used to estimate highway emissions? (Check one)
Q - Link-based procedure *
L-I - Trip-based procedure *
D -Hybrid procedure *
D - Other (Please explain below)
* Section II of this manual describes each of these procedures in more detail.
E-l
-------
5. a) How were VMT and vehicle operating speeds estimated for use in developing the emissions inventories?
(e.g. Are the estimates based on traffic counts and travel time surveys or are they based on estimates
from the travel forecasting procedures used for urban transportation planning?)
b) Are there any elements of the travel estimation procedures that are questionable?
e) What year's data was used to calibrate the travel estimation procedures cited in Question 5a?
d) When were the procedures cited in question 5a last validated (i.e., checked to determine if they can
reproduce observed traffic flows)?
6. Are estimates of "off-network" VMT (e.g., VMT on links normally not included in a computerized highway
network) accounted for in the highway emissions inventories? If yes, briefly describe how the VMT and
corresponding operating speeds estimates for each travel were determined.
E-2
-------
7. a) What procedure was used to estimate mobile source emission factors? (Check one)
G MOBILE 1
C MOBILE 2
C Other procedure (Enter name of procedure) ______
b) If "Other" was checked in question 7a, describe and assess the adequacy of the procedure.
3. Based on the above, summarize and briefly discuss any major deficiencies in the travel and emissions estimation
procedures used by this urban area.
E-3
-------
WORKSHEET 1
TRAVEL DATA FOR REASONABLENESS .ASSESSMENT
NAME Or UflBAN AflEA .
REGION OF COUNTY (SEE FIGURE 2).
VARIABLE
* B^api «ll Pi fiji ^
•I Local
f) Tool
3. AMnaoOatty VMTby
a) LOV
It LOTIKBOOOfeBJ
e> LDT2<>«OOOIbaJ
d) HOC
•> HOO
f) mQ
1) Tool
OR
i) Track
i) Too*
4. Awra*»OatfyOpmanf
Df PiNMMBM- ArtBfUl
OR
5. AMrac* OMv Trtp
LMftt
S. A«wa*» Oailv Vtfricto Tript
b) Tmehs
P«otor
ESTIMATE FOR OA5E YEAR
VALUE UNITS
*
ijiotirt
1JO«rta*
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
1,000*0*
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
(000)
(CC4JI
(0001
1000)
inimta
par hour
S'
—
in 1JJOO*t
(000)
(000)
SOURCE
•
Funettoral ctaMfficttton*. »• Appendix C.
MOBOf 1 vwnlet* etaMtfleattam. SM Appendix C.
E-4
-------
> Cu
ZS:
« t/3
II
CO CO
•<
ts
(N
b2 ™"
CO en
C a-
So
CO
CO
Cd
t-
u
u.
O
111
5
2
CO
a
2
a
2
uZ
CRITERIA
II
LU
CO
CO
oc
u.
IU
1-
S uj
f= =»
CO -1
UJ <
VARIABLE
CM
a>
I
s
(O
c
Jj
. Average Daily Cold/
Hot Operating Fractions
) Cold Mode Catalyst
) Hot Mode Catalyst
) Cold Mode Non -catalyst
QQ TO A U
See Table 9
Indicate Source
^
'z
(3
Meteorological Data
1 Summertime
Temperature
) Summertime
Humidity
oi * -°
09 O
II
s s
o o
1- H-
I. Total Annual Highway
Emissions
1 HC
)IMOX
*• * "°
E-5
-------
Ul
eg
fid
o
Q <
Z
ui
a
z
o
en
Ed
a-
x
ui
cn
^
O
OJ
S-
c
I
£8
<
2
UI
>
01
a.
I
*
ui
UI
a
r» to
> ^
as' Z
E-6
-------
TORXSHEZ7 2c
VARIABLE 12: VEHICLE EMISSION RATES BY FUNCTIONAL CLASS
(GM/VMT)
HIGHWAY
CLASSIFICATION
!a«Md^_(MPHI
INTERSTATE
, ,. 4^Mfc^»M M<*
tvQfffmvoiiOTs? nw
NOx
SoMd____IMPH)
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
NOx
linn trr^it
MINOK AKTZHIAL
MO>
SaMd____ IMPH)
COLUECTOM
N0«
Tpial (mm 11
LOCAL
NQ>
TOTAL
MOx
COMPOSITE
EMISSIONS
ESTIMATE
CHITEHIA
S~Ri.3or9«orHC
S»R«.*or10*orMO»
•
TOTAL AUTO
EMISSIONS
ESTIMATE
CRITERIA
SMK*S«r 11««rHC
SM Kg. 8 or « tor NOs
TOTAL TRUCK
EMISSIONS
ESTIMATE
•
CRITERI
Swm».7ar13i
SM^.8or14
row in *w Taofc*. For VMT i
^^M flM^MilMd MV4«M4&MB^M>M EMM •
POT nwiiBEi ntiowppi . mr i
E-7
-------
WORKSHEET 3
REASONABLENESS ASSESSMENT FOR TRAVEL DATA
VARIABLE
llDaily VMT/Capfta
14J*reantVMT
by Functional CSaai
•) Intaiiuia
b) Principai Artariai
ei Minor Artariai
dl Cailactor
a) LoMi
1S.fareamVMT
By VaMeteOaai
*) LOV
b) LDTKBOOOIba.)
O LDTOeOOOIbaJ
dl HOG
a) HDD
f) MC
OR
«) Auto
hi Truck
ib. Total VMT
1 7. VaMote Operating
Saaodby
PufMnonM OMB
oi Prinoo'i1 ArtaWiBi
e) Minor Ararial
dl CoMaetor
•1 LOMi
OR
f|A«araoa Vahieta
SymmSpoad
ia.A«araoaOaiiyTrip
Langtti
1 9. VMtieto Tripi/Capita
•i PMMVifvr VWIMMB
bl Truck*
BASE YEAR REASONABLENESS
MEASURES
MEASURE
mi/par.
X
X
%
X
*
X
X
X
X
X
X-
X
X
1.000 mi/day
mm.
Tripvpar.
Trip/par.
COMPUTATION
(2fr-1al
(2a-r2f)
(2b4-2f)
(2e4-2f)
(2d-r2f)
0«2«
(3*43>)
(3b-r3g)
(3e+38)
(3d4-3j)
(3»,» 3;)
(»43»»
(3h43|)
" (34-3!)
Osorj)
<4a)
I4b»
(4c)
(4dl
Mai
(4»
(5.)
(8^-1.)
(«»-r1a)
"'
CRITERIA
SM TABLE 3
mi/pman
SM TABLE 4
(•araami
X
X
X
X
X
(Paraant)
7«-n x
5-12 X
ZJ4 X
1JJ-4J X
2*7.5 X
0-1 X
7849 X
10-22 X
14)00 mi/day
SM TABLE 5
imilowtwurl
mpn
men
mph
mpn
man
SM TABLE*
mph
SM TABLE 7
(mmuiai)
1&-2A Trips/par.
J7-^« Tripa/par.
SM TABLE 8
FINDINGS
*
•
E-8
-------
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
i. REPOHT NO.
EPA-4CO/12-8Q-002
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. T1TL2 AND SUBTITLE
Guidelines for Review of Highway Source
Emission Inventories for 1982 State
Implementation Plans
5. REPORT DATE
December, 1980
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
John F. DiRenzo and Mark Hallenbeck
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
1990 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-3506
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Office of Transportation and Land Use Policy
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington. D.C. 20460
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
FINAL REPORT
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NO i ES
IS. ABSTRACT
This manual presents procedures and data to assist EPA, state, and local agencies
in assessing the adequacy of HC and NO highway source emission inventories for
1980, the base year of interest in preparing 1982 SIP submission. The procedures
provide a basis for reviewing: (1) the reasonableness cf travel and relatsd inputs
used to estimate HC and NO emissions and (2) the reasonableness of the emissions
estimates themselves. The procedures are applicable to urban areas with a popula-
tion greater than 200,000 people.
17. KEYWORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
Air Quality Planning
Urban Transportation Planning
Emission Inventories
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Unclassified
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report/
Unclassified
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
c. COSATI Field/Group
21. NO. OF PAGES
74
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (R»». 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
-------