EPA-450/2-85-006
Maps Depicting Nonattainment
Areas Pursuant to Section 107
of the Clean Air Act -1985
by
Jerry Yarn
Willis Beat
Cilton Tate
Control Program Development Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Control Programs Operations Branch
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air, Noise, and Radiation
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
September 1985
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to re-
port technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies
are available - in limited quantities - from the Library Services Office
(MD-35), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161
Publication No. EPA-450/2-85-006
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
PREFACE V
DEFINITIONS AND MAP LEGENDS viii
NONATTAINMENT MAPS - ENTIRE U .S ix
REGION I NONATTAINMENT MAPS 1
REG ION II NONATTAINMENT MAPS 27
REGION III NONATTAINMENT MAPS 37
REGION IV NONATTAINMENT MAPS 61
REGION V NONATTAINMENT MAPS 95
REGION VI NONATTAINMENT MAPS 127
REGION VII NONATTAINMENT MAPS 143
REGION VIII NONATTAINMENT MAPS 1 59
REGION IX NONATTAINMENT MAPS 178
REGION X NONATTAINMENT MAPS 197
APPENDIX 211
TECHNICAL DATA REPORT 219
111
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Special mention is given to J. Calvin Thames and Melinda K. Cornman
with Engineering-Science for the data editing, maps production, and the
assembly and printing of this report.
IV
-------
PREFACE
In 1971, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for five pollutants considered
to be most dangerous to human health and welfare. These pollutants
and their numerical standard values are identified in the following
table:
SUMMARY OF NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
Pollutant
Particulate Matter
(TSP)
Sulfur Dioxide
(S02)
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
Nitrogen Dioxide
N02)
Ozone
Averaging Time
Annual
(Geometric Mean)
24-hour
Annual
(Arithmetic Mean)
24-hour
3 -hour
8-hour
1-hour
Annual
(Arithmetic Mean)
1 -hour
Primary
Standards
75 ug/m3
260 ug/m3
80 ug/m3
(0.03 ppm)
365 ug/m3
(0.04 ppm)
10 ug/m3
(9 ppm)
40 ug/m3
(35 ppm)
100 ug/3
(0.05 ppm)
243 ug/m3)
(0.12 ppm )
Secondary
Standards
150 ug/m3
1 ,300 ug/m3
(0.5 ppm )
Same as primary
Same as primary
Same as primary
Same as primary
In 1972, States were required to submit to EPA State Implementation
Plans (SIP's) containing control measures to meet these primary and
secondary standards by mid-1975 or mid-1977. Generally, the long-term
SIP progress for meeting these standards was positive. However, because
of the complex nature of many air quality problems, some areas of the
country still did not attain the NAAQS.
In recognition of this fact, in August 1977 Congress amended the
Clean Air Act. Section 107(d) directed each State to submit to the
Administrator of EPA a list describing the NAAQS attainment status of
all areas within the State. These State submittals were initially re-
viewed and promulgated by EPA on March 3, 1978. In cases where EPA and
a State could not reach agreement, an EPA designation replaced the State
submitted designation. Also, in cases where a State failed to submit
-------
designations, EPA promulgated appropriate designations. Under Section
107(d)(5) of the Clean Air Act, a State may revise its designation and
submit these to EPA for promulgation. Current EPA criteria for process-
ing redesignations were summarized in an April 21, 1983 memorandum from
Sheldon Meyers, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
This memorandum was supplemented by a December 23, 1983 memorandum from
G.T. Helms, Chief, Control Programs Development Division (see Appendix).
For those areas designated as nonattainment for one or more pollu-
tants, States were required to develop additional control programs and
plans that, when implemented, would lead to attainment of the NAAQS by
1982 (or 1987 for areas with difficult carbon monoxide or ozone
problems).
Since March 3, 197C, there have been many changes to the nonattain-
ment designations. The maps and lists in this volume reflect the non-
attainment status of the States as of September 1, 1985.
The following table identifies the number of counties, or portions
thereof, designated as nonattainment as of September 1, 1985.
NONATTAINMENT AREAS IN ALL OR PART OF THE COUNTIES IN THE U.S.
Total No. of Counties or County Equivalents
with Nonattainment Areas - September 1 , 1 985
Carbon Monoxide 142
Nitrogen Dioxide 4
Ozone 368
Sulfur Dioxide 60
Total Suspended Particulates 290
Total Areas 864
This report is a detailed mapping of the United States depicting
those areas that are not attaining the NAAQS. Following the preface are
maps for each pollutant showing all the nonattainment areas in the Conti-
nental United States. The remainder of the report is arranged in numeri-
cal order of, and color coded by, Regions I through X to show the non-
attainment areas in each State for each pollutant. It includes lists of
the nonattainment areas. Only actions made final on or before September
1, 1985 are included in this publication. Proposed designation changes
or potential changes currently undergoing Agency review are not described
in the report.
VI
-------
Each State's section includes a map identifying all county
names (except Alaska and Hawaii) and maps for each of the pollutants
for which the State is classified nonattainment. This volume does not
include States having no nonattainment areas of any kind. Listing of
nonattainment areas for territories outside the Continental United
States are included although maps are not.
The nonattainment area listing for each State should clarify any
situations where it may be difficult to interpret the shading on the
maps. In addition, the legend on the definitions page which follows nay
also be clearer than some of the legends printed with the maps.
Any questions concerning the precise location or description of
specific nonattainment areas hould be directed to the appropriate
Regional Offices as listed below:
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region I, J.F.K. Federal Building, Room 2203,
Boston, Massachusetts 02203 (617) 223-5134 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachu-
setts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region II, 26 Federal Plaza, Room 1009, New
York, New York 10278 (212) 264-2517 (New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico,
Virgin Islands).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region III, 841 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19107 (215) 597-4713 (Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania,
Virginia, West Virginia, District of Columbia).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region IV, 345 Courtland Street, N.E., Atlanta,
Georgia 30365 (404) 881-2904 (Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, South Carolina).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region V, 230 South Dearborn Street, Chicago,
Illinois 60604 (312) 353-2211 (Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota,
Ohio, Wisconsin).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VI, First International Building, 1201
Elm Street, Dallas, Texas 75270 (214) 767-8950 (Arkansas, Louisiana,
Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VII, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101 (913) 236-2893 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 1300, Denver,
Colorado 80295 (303) 293-1753 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Utah, Wyoming).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region IX, 215 Fremont Street, San Francisco,
California 94105 (415) 974-8058 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada,
Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands).
Air Programs Branch, EPA Region X, 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101 (206) 442-4198 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington).
VI1
-------
DEFINITIONS
Nonattainment Area - The term "nonattainment area" means for any air
pollutant an area which is shown by monitored data or which is calcu-
lated by air quality modeling (or other methods determined by the
Administrator to be reliable) to violate any national ambient air
quality standard for such pollutant.
National Primary Ambient Air Quality Standards - National primary
ambient air quality standards shall be ambient air quality standards the
attainment and maintenance of which in the judgment of the Administrator,
based on such criteria and allowing an adequate margin of safety, are re-
quisite to protect the public health.,
National Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards - Any national secon-
dary ambient air quality standard shal specific a level of air quality
the attainment and maintenance of which in the judgrent of the Adminis-
trator, based on such criteria, is requisite to protect the public wel-
fare from any known or anticipated adverse effects associated with the
presence of such air pollutant in the ambient air.
Map Legends
PRIM-ENTIRE COUNTY
PRIM-PART OF COUNTY
SEC-ENTIRE COUNTY
SEC-PART OF COUNTY
PRIM S SEC-PART OF CO
VI11
-------
CO
LU
M
H
Z
ID
o
u
CD
z
h-
I
z
o
Q_
CO
U_
O
CO
Q
LU
CD
_l
ID
S
O
oc
D-
in
(0
01
cr
UJ
CD
UJ
ui
IX
-------
en
LU
z
Z)
o
CJ
CD
z
M
<
o
z:
ai
o
CO
u_
o
h-
co
M
_J
Q
LU
f-
<
CD
O
cr
Q.
in
CO
01
UJ
CD
ID
a
UJ
01
-------
in
CD
01
-------
CO
UJ
Z)
O
a
CD
z
I
z
O
O
O
u_
O
CO
M
a
UJ
CD
_J
O
tr
CL
in
CD
(II
a:
UJ
CQ
tu
H
Q.
UJ
U)
XI1
-------
to
LU
Z)
a
u
CD
h-
h-
<
I
-z.
o
CVJ
o
u_
o
a
LJJ
h-
<
CD
_J
o
a:
a.
in
oo
en
tr
tu
m
a
m
07
XI 3 1
-------
Region I
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region I
JFK Federal Building
Room 2303
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
(617)223-5134
-------
-------
ftS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT I"EETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT SIR QUALITY STftNDflRDS
FOR
CONNECTICUT
COUNTY
FAIRFIELD CO
HARTFORD CO
LITCHFIELD CO
MIDDLESEX CO
tEbl HAVEN CO
NEW LONDON CO
TOLLAND CO
WINDHfttt CO
POPULATION
T S P S 0 £
PRI« SEC PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
807143
887766
156769
129017
761337
238409
114823
92312
U
W
U
W
U
U
W
W
U
P
P
U
U
P
U
U
U
W
U
COUNTIES NOT ffiETINB THE
NflTIONflL flMBIENT AIR QUALITY STftNDflRDS
FDR
KAINE
COUNTY
ANDROSCQSGIN CO
CUMBERLAND CO
FRANKLIN CO
KENNEBEC CO
KNOX CO
LINCOLN CO
OXFORD CO
PENOBSCOT CO
SASADftHCC CO
SOMERSET CO
UflLDO CO
WASHINGTON CO
YORK CO
POPULATION
99657
215789
27447
189889
32941
25691
48966
137815
28795
45046
28414
34963
139666
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
P P
CD N02 0 Z
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
flS OF SEPTEMBER 19B5
COUNTIES NOT MEETIN6 THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
MASSACHUSETTS
COUNTY
BflRNSTABLE CO
BERKSHIRE CO
BRISTOL CO
DUKES CO
ESSEX CO
FRANKLIN CO
HftMPDEN CO
HAMPSHIRE CO
MIDDLESEX CO
NANTUCKET CO
NORFOLK CO
PLYMOUTH CO
SUFFOLK CO
WORCHESTER CO
POPILATIDN
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
147925
145116
474641
8942
633632
64317
443018
138813
1367034
5087
606587
405437
650142
646352
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C 0 NQ2 D Z
U
U
U
U
U
y
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NEW HAMPSHIRE
COUNTY
BELKNflP CO
CHESHIRE CO
COOS CD
HILLSBOROUSH CO
KERRIMACK CO
ROCKIN6WM CO
STRAFORD CO
SULLIVAN CO
POPULATION
42884
62116
35147
276608
98302
198345
85488
36063
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
U
U
P U
U
u
u
u
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
W = THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NflTIQNftL flMBIENT flIR QUflLITY STflNMRI»o
FOS
RHODE ISLAND
COUNTY
BRISTOL CO
KENT CO
NEWPORT CO
PROVIDENCE CO
WASHINGTON CO
POPULflTIDN1
46942
154163
81383
571349
93317
T S P
PRIK SEC
S 0 2
PRIM SEC
CO N02 02
U
U
W
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NflTIONftL ftMBIENT flIR QUflLITY STflNDflRDS
FDR
VERMONT
COUNTY
CHITTENDEN CO
WfiSHINGTDt^ CO
POPULflTIDS
115534
47659
T S P S 0 £
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
P
P
CO N02 0 Z
P = PflRT OF THE COUNTY
H = THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
n
ji
CJ
I—i
CJ
L±J
O
CJ
-------
LU
o
in
03
m
CE CC LU UJ
o. a. tn cn
I
ID
CJ
h-
CJ
LU
O
CJ
CO
LU
h-1
h-
z
^)
o
o
CD
M
<
h-
h-
o
z
Q_
LO
LL
O
in
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
2
O
DC
Q.
in
CO
m
-------
CJ
LU
o
CJ
in
LU
.
Z)
o
u
LD
M
Z)
CJ <
HH b
2
O
LU
2
O
N
O
I—
d
LU
t—
<
CD
O
DC
CL
in
oo
0)
-------
a
o
CJ
ID
CO
cn
° R
CJ "
cr cr
a. o_
LJ
LO
LU
Z
ZD
O
u
CD
z
u
LU
z
-/-
s
o
CJ
1
z
0
z
o
CJ
U_
o
H
co
H
a
LU
t—
<
CD
a
CE
D_
in
00
01
cc
UJ
m
UJ
-------
UJ
-------
05
LU
I-H
1—
Z
13
O
U
03
Z
H
in
CD
01
tr
LU
CD
2:
HI
I-
0.
UJ
Cfl
LU
<
<
I—
f-
<
I
z
o
z
Q.
u_
o
C/)
M
_J
a
LJ
i—
<
CD
_j
ID
S
O
DC
a.
-------
CO
LJJ
1—I
1—
Z
13
O
CJ
CD
ID
ID
01
tr
!D
CD
UJ
H
CL
LU
t/1
h—I
h-
o
z
OJ
o
CO
LJ_
o
CO
M
_J
a
LU
h-
<
CO
_j
ID
2:
a
oc
D.
10
-------
LU
z
ID
O
0
CD
Z
in
CO
en
ct
m
CD
UJ
a.
tu
U)
LU
Z
I—I
o
z
LU
z
o
Nl
O
LL
o
a
LU
CO
_!
ID
2
O
cr
a.
11
-------
LU
en
ID
cj
<
LO
CO
12
-------
a
<
z
O,
Q.
CO:
ID
CD
LT)
•*-i
U.
O
>- >; ^ >-
I— H- i_ f-
iill
s°s
SggE
i ?T ?
H S P. O
cc a: UJ LU
a. a. co co
en
LU
en
ID
CJ
CO
C/J
LU
ZD
O
CJ
CD
z
O
D_
in
U_
O
h-
cn
a
LU
CD
_J
Z)
2:
O
LT
CL
in
to
01
ct
ID
CD
IU
H
Q.
HI
U)
13
-------
LU
-------
LLJ
o
u
in
m
en
S "
on
UJ
CO
I—
\—
LU
CO
ID
X
CJ
<
CO
CO
o
CJ
CD
z
M
z
M
<
1-
I
1
<
1
z
o
z
o
CJ
U_
O
a
LU
h-
<
CD
o
cr
Q-
m
01
oc
UJ
CD
Z
UJ
I-
Q.
UJ
0)
15
-------
LU
cr
i—i
D_
:z
<
LJ
16
-------
UJ!
z:
Oj
o.
U7
ID
GO
cn
i§ii
B °£fe
LU
QC
X
LO
Q_
<
LLJ
cn
UJ
M
I-
z
Z3
O
CJ
CD
O
z
Q.
CO
h-
LL
O
CO
M
n
LU
CD
_l
13
S
O
cc
CL
in
00
0)
It
UJ
CD
111
H
0.
UJ
05
17
-------
UJ
in
oo
m
LLJ
cr
o
CJ
CD
2
M
z:
H
cc
lil
m
UJ
H
Q.
UJ
u:
LL
z
o
OJ
o
CO
o
I-
a
LLJ
h-
<
to
_J
ID
s:
o
cr
Q.
18
-------
Ul
LU
in
CD
en
LU
DC
\—i
X
z
ID
O
u
CD
a:
UJ
m
ILI
a.
UJ
01
Q_
<
LU
i
z
o
z
LU
Z
o
N
O
O
M
a
LU
t-
<
CD
o
tr
a.
19
-------
IJJ
cr
X
en
o_
<
LLJ
z
in
ID
n
I-
o
u
CO
•z.
h-
f-
z:
o
o
u
LL
o
a
LU
CD
_l
Z3
S
O
DC
CL
ID
00
01
•H
Ct
11J
CD
Z
LU
H
Q.
til
U)
20
-------
11
Q
(f]
LU
Q
O
X
DC
21
-------
01
IU
'Z.
ID
O
o
CO
IO
0)
01
cr
m
aa
2
LU
f-
Q.
UJ
0)
hH
IU
a
o
cr
M
<
f-
H-
<
I
'Z.
O
CL
If)
LL
O
cn
H-l
a
LU
CO
_J
Z)
2:
o
en
CL-
22
-------
UJ
2:
M
O
O
S S
it! fe
tr cc
a. S:
in
DO
en
en
UJ
in
CD
0)
Q
o
CJ
CD
Z
M
Z
M
<
I
-z.
a
LLJ g
Qo
N
O °
31 fe
DC H
CO
Q
UJ
CD
_l
Z)
S
o
tr
a.
tr.
UJ
m
UJ
a.
UJ
U)
23
-------
II
S 8
o
IT)
00
cn
cr a:
a. Q_
C/J
IU
f— I
in
ao
0)
nc
tu
hH
o
O
u
CD
z
M
z
(— I
<
h-
H-
Z
O
z
o
u
Li.
a
i—
in
a
UJ
no
o
a:
r.u
a.
UJ
01
24
-------
o
GC
U_J
25
-------
o
DC
UJ
CO
LU
M
ID
O
U
CD
2
M
I—
H-
O
o.
cn
u_
Q
1-
cn
M
a
LLJ
CD
o
LT
Q.
in
GO
m
•H
a
UJ
m
2:
LU
H
Q.
LU
05
26
-------
Region II
New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region II
Federal Office Building
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10007
(212)264-2517
-------
AS DF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NEW JERSEY
COUNTY
ATLANTIC CO
BERBEN CO
BURLINGTON CO
CAMDEN CO
CAPE MAY CO
CUMBERLAND CO
ESSEX CO
GLOUCESTER CO
HUDSON CO
HUNTERDON CO
fERCER CO
MIDDLESEX CO
WWiQUTH CO
MORRIS CO
OCEAN CO
PASSAIC CO
SALEM CO
SOMERSET CO
SUSSEX CO
UNION CO
WARREN CO
POPULATION
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
194119
845385
362542
471658
82268
132866
851116
199917
556972
87361
307863
595893
583173
407630
346038
447585
64676
203129
116119
504094
B4429
P
P
P
U
P
P
P
P
P
P
y
y
y
y
y
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
u
y
y
w
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
COUNTIES NOT MEETING T!£
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NEW YORK
COUNTY
(OANY CO
BRONX CO
ERIE CO
GREENE CO
KINGS CO
NASSAU CO
NEW YORK CO
NIAGARA CO
ONONDA6A CO
QUEENS CO
RICHMOND CO
ROCKLAND CO
SARATOGA CO
SO€NECTADY CO
UESTCHESTER CO
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
POPULATION
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
285909
1168972
1015472
40861
2230936
1321582
1428285
227354
463920
1891325
352121
259530
153759
149946
866599
P
P
P P
P
P
y
P
P
P
P
U
U
P
y
P
u
P
P
P
u
u
y
y
u
u
u
y
u
27
= THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NOTIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
PUERTO RICO
T S P S 0 £
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIH SEC CO N02 02
BAYAMON CO 196286 P
CATANO CO 26243 kJ
GUAYNABO CO 80742 P
TOA BAJfl CO 78246 P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY H = THE WHOLE COUNTY
28
-------
LLJ
ui
DC
UJ
LU
29
-------
LU
01
CE
LU
LU
in
LU
M
h-
O
u
LD
o
_
o
_J
a
LU
h-
<
CD
_J
Z)
s
o
a:
a.
in
OD
0)
cc
tu
o
iti
a.
UJ
ui
30
-------
in
in
CO
m
LU
CO
CC
LU
LU
a
u
CD
I-
i-
<
i
z
o
z
LLJ
z
o
N
O
LL.
O
LO
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
2
O
CE
Q.
cr
UJ
m
z
UJ
H
Q.
UJ
U)
31
-------
LLJ
Z
o
z
CJ 0
fe
52
DC CC
o. n.
l_»l
ID
CD
m
LU
CO
or
LU
LU
z
in
UJ
ID
O
a
CD
z
o
o
o
Lu
o
CO
M
_J
a
LU
CD
_J
^)
s
o
DC
D_
in
(0
01
cc
ID
CD
UJ
a.
m
CO
32
-------
cr
o
LU
33
-------
cr
o
LU
LU
n
h-
z
ID
O
O
CD
Z
H
z
M
z
O
z
OL
LO
LL
o
en
d
LU
f-
<
CD
_J
Z)
S
O
CE
Q-
34
-------
LJJ
.
o
X
a
in
m
en
z ^
° I
CJ <->
fe
tz tr
II
n S
cr tr
Q. Q.
DC
O
>-
UJ
UD
LU
ID
O
U
CD
z
t-l
o
LLJ
Z
O
N
O
O
a
UJ
i—
<
CD
o
cr
a.
35
-------
LU
I—
I—
o
in
00
en
§§
a.
CE CX
Q_ 0_
cr
o
LU
LO
LU
M
I—
O
U
CD
H
2
M
o
z
o
u
_
o
I-
cn
i— i
a
LU
i __
O
cr
o_
36
-------
Region ill
Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region III
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
(215)597-4713
-------
flS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
DELAWARE
T S P S 0 £
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N0£ 02
NEW CflSTLE CO 398115 W
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
DIST. COLUMBIA
T S P S 0 £
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
WASHINGTON 638432 U W
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
MARYLAND
T S P S 0 £
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N0£ 0 Z
flNNE ARUNDEL CO 378775 P U
BALTIMORE CO 655615 P P U
CARROLL CO 96356 M
HARFDRD CO 145938 U
HOWARD CO 11857£ M
MONTGOMERY CO 579053 P U
PRINCE GEORGES CO 66M71 P U
BALTIMORE 786775 P P P U
P = PART OF THE COUNTY U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
37
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY
POPULATION
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIX SEC
CD N02 0 Z
ADAMS CO
ALLEGHENY CO
AR16TRON6 CO
BEAVER CO
BEDFORD CO
BERKS CO
BLAIR CO
BUCKS CO
BUTLER CO
CAMBRIA CO
CARBON CO
CENTRE CO
CHESTER CO
CLEARFIELD CO
CRAWFORD CO
CUMBERLAND CO
DAUPHIN CO
DELAWARE CO
ERIE CO
FAYETTE CO
FRANKLIN CO
6REENE CO
INDIANA CO
JUNIATA CO
LACKAUANNACO
LANCASTER CO
LAURENCE CO
LEBANON CO
LEHI6H CO
LUZERNE CO
LYCOMING CO
MERCER CO
MONROE CO
MONTGOMERY CO
NORTHAMPTON CO
NORTHUMBERLAND CO
PERRY CO
PHILADELPHIA CO
PIKE CO
SCHUYLKILL CO
68292
1458085 P P
77768 P
204441 P
46784
312589 P
136621 P
479211
147912
183263 P
53285
112768
316668 P
83578
86869
178541
232317
555887
279788 P
159417
113629
40476
92281
19188
227988
362346 P
187158 P
188582
272349 P
343879
118416
128299 P
69489
643621 P
225418 P
188381 P
35718
16BB218 P
18271
168638
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
w
u
u
u
u
u
w
u
w
u
w
u
u
u
u
u
H
u
w
u
u
u
w
u
u
u
u
u
w
U
u
u
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U » THE WHOLE COUNTY
38
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FDR
PENNSYLVANIA
T S P S 0 2
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 02
SNYDERCO 32504 P W
SOMERSET CO 81243 U
SUSQUEHANNA CO 37876 U
WARREN CO 47449 P U
WASHINGTON CO 217074 P U
WflYNE CO 35237 U
WESTMORELAND CO 392294 P U
WYOMING CO 26433 U
YORK 312963 P U
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR OJALITY STANDARDS
FOR
VIRGINIA
T S P S 0 £
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
ARLINGTON CO 152599 U U
CHESTERFIELD CO . 141372 M
FAIRFAX CO 596901 P W
HENRICO CO 180735 *
LOUDOUN CO 57427 U
PRINCE WILLIAM CO 144703 U
ALEXANDRIA 103217 U W
FAIRFAX 19390 U
FALLS CHURCH 9515 U
MANASSAS 15438 U
NANASSAS PARK 6524 U
RICHMOND 219214 U
P = PART OF THE COUNTY W = THE WHOLE COUNTY
39
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
WEST VIRGINIA
T S P SOS
COUN.TY POPULATION PRIK SEC PRIM SEC C D N02 OZ
BROOKE CO 31117 U
FAYETTE CO 57863 P
HANCOCK CO 41053 W P
OHIO CO 61389 W
WOOD CO 93646 P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY W = THE WHOLE COUNTY
40
-------
BI
J
LJJ
DC
LU
CD
41
-------
LU
<
o
X
ol
IE
CO
m
s s
S S
DC DC
Q- Q.
LU
cr
LU
Q
CD
UJ
ID
O
U
CD
z
M
I
z
o
z
LU
Z
o
N
O
Q
UJ
CD
_J
O
a.
a.
a>
en
DC
Ui
i
UJ
a
Ul
42
-------
GO
O
CJ
O
CJ
CC
LO
h-H
Q
43
-------
u
ID
00
g s
a. a_
DO
O
CJ
LL
O
h-
CJ
CO
LU
M
h-
2
ZJ
Q
U
CD
h-
<
I
2
O
O
O
LL
O
CO
C/3 Q
M jfi
Q g
o
CT
Q-
in
oo
en
44
-------
UJ
<
o
X
o
in
DO
en
8 "
UJ fe
op cr
a. a.
H
<
tn
ID
O
CJ
C/7
g
z:
M
<
h-
I-
LJL
0
h-
CJ
1 — 1
1 1
cr
h-
en
i — i
i i
a
z
a
z
UJ
z
o
Nl
O
u_
o
1—
0}
M
_J
Q
UJ
h-
CD
1
__J
ID
«^-
,£.
O
DC
a.
U)
01
01
n
UJ
CD
ID
H
O.
UJ
U)
45
-------
Q
>-
cn
<
46
-------
LU
2
QJ
COi
in
oo
en
>- >- CD
Hi
O 0 u
T
LU
tr a:
a. a.
cn
Q
<
CO
LLl
13
O
U
CD
<
I—
h-
<
I
Z
O
Q.
cn
I-
m
o
cn
a
LLJ
h-
<
CD
_J
O
LT
CL
in
00
cn
•H
EC
111
ffl
s
UJ
H
Q.
UJ
U)
47
-------
LU
<
§1
X
o
in
GO
en
s s
fe
cr cr
Q. D-
Q
DC
<
C/l
(U
13
O
u
CD
z
M
<
t-
I
-z.
o
LU
Z
o
N
O
in
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
2
O
oc
Q.
in
oo
0)
cr
tu
ca
tu
a.
UJ
in
48
-------
UJ
2:
z:
i—i
<
I
O!
o
CJ
ID
CD
cn
s s
LU
a. a.
CL
in
UJ
Z)
o
u
CD
-2L
H
-z.
M
<
I—
O
~z.
o
o
o
a
UJ
t—
<
CD
O
DC
Q-
m
CO
0)
a:
UJ
ca
UJ
i-
Q.
UJ
0)
-------
LU
Q_
50
-------
t/)
LU
M
I—
z
ID
O
a
t£)
z
M
z
O
z
0.
tn
i—
LL
O
h-
tn
a
UJ
CD
_l
Z)
21
O
GC
D_
ID
en
a:
UJ
m
2:
UJ
H
Q.
UJ
0)
51
-------
UJ!
2
M
<
h-
H-
<
2'
Oj
OJ
o
10
in
CD
en
>->•>->- o
(- I— 1- I- cj
i|i§fe
u " ° fe
uj fe t.i u.
-------
LU
O
X
O
gs
oc a:
a. a.
in
CD
en
LO
LU
Q_
CO
uj
M
O
u
CD
h-
<
I
z
O
z
UJ
z
O
N
O
LL
O
h-
in
a
LU
i-
<
CD
a
cr
D.
V)
o
01
DC
UJ
CD
(11
t-
Q.
UJ
U)
53
-------
CO
z
LU
Q_
en
LU
o
o
CD
o
z
o
CJ
LJ_
o
en
a
LU
CD
_j
^)
2:
o
QC
0.
in
m
en
cc
IU
m
LU
a.
LU
U)
54
-------
\—\
CD
cr
55
-------
LU
X
o
in
00
en
i
CC CC
Q_ Q.
I—I
CD
cr
LO
LU
M
I—
z
Z)
o
u
CD
h-
I—
z:
o
LU
Z
o
N
O
LL
O
Q
LU
CD
_J
Z)
21
O
DC
Q.
in
CD
01
tr
LU
m
^.
LU
(-
0.
LU
-------
LUl
<
I
o
o
in
oo
0}
II
S "
r
£
XV \N
CD
CT
01
LU
O
u
UD
f-
l—
<
I
z:
O
Q
U
U_
O
en
M
a
LLJ
CD
_l
r)
2:
o
DC
Q.
in
OD
01
EC
ID
m
m
t-
Q.
m
en
57
-------
h-1
CD
DC
LO
LLJ
58
-------
<
CD
GC
C/J
LU
CO
UJ
O
U
CJD
2
1
Z
O
Q_
LO
h-
L4_
O
I-
cn
a
UJ
CD
O
LT
a.
CD
tr
UJ
m
2
UJ
H
a.
LU
to
59
-------
UJ
z
o
OJ
o
en
in
00
cn
CD
CL
M
CO
LU
cn
LU
ID
O
CJ
CD
Z
M
<
J-
I
Z
0
OJ
o
in
u_
o
Q
LU
CD
O
cr
Q.
in
GO
m
60
-------
Region IV
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region IV
345 Courtland, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
(404)881-2904
-------
flS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
ALABAMA
COUNTY
COLBERT CO
ETOWftH CO
JACKSON CO
JEFFERSON CO
LAUDERDALE CO
MOBILE CO
RUSSELL CO
POPULATION
54519
103857
51407
671324
88546
364980
47356
T S P
PRIM SEC
P
P
S 0 2
PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
y
U
y
u
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
FLORIDA
COUNTY
BRDWARD CO
DADE CD
DUVAL CO
HILLSBOROU6H CO
ORftNBE CO
PAU BEACH CO
PINELLAS CO
POPULATION
1018200
1625781
571003
646960
471016
576863
728531
T S P
PRIM SEC
P
P
S 0 2
PRIM SEC
CO NQ2 0 Z
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P = PART OF Tf£ COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
61
-------
flS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING TIC
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
SEORSIfl
COUNTY
CLAYTON CO
COBB CO
COiETA CO
DE KftLBCO
DOUGLAS CO
FAYETTE CO
FULTON CO
6HINNETT CO
HENRY CO
HUSC06EE CO
PAULDIN6 CO
ROCKDALE CO
POPULflTION
150357
29771B
39268
483024
54573
29043
569904
166903
3630S
170108
26110
36747
T S P S 0 £
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
P U
U
U
P U
U
U
P U
U
U
U
U
U
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR DUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
KENTUCKY
COUNTY
BELL CO
BOONE CO
BOYD CO
BULLITT CO
CAMPBELL CO
DAVIESS CO
HENDERSON CO
JEFFERSON CO
KENTONCO
LAURENCE CO
MC CRACKEN CO
MADISON CO
KUHLENBER6CD
PERRY £0
PIKE CO
WHITLEYCO
T S P SOS
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO NG£ 0 Z
34330
45842
55513
43346
63317
85949
40849
684565
137058
14121
61310
53352
32238
33763
81123
333%
P
U
P
P
P
P
U
P
U
P
P
P
P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
W = THE WHOLE COUNTY
62
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
MISSISSIPPI
COUNTY
JOKES CO
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
6191C P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NOTIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY
MECKLENBURG CO
T S P S 0 Z
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
4M278 W U
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
SOUTH CAROLINA
COUNTY
CHARLESTON CO
HIGHLAND CO
YORK CO
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIK SEC PRIM SEC CO
276974 P
269735 P
106720
N02 0 Z
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
63
-------
AS Or SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
TENNESSEE
COUNTY
BENTONCO
BRADLEY CO
CMPBELLCO
DAVIDSON CO
HAMILTON CO
HUMPHREYS CO
KNOX CO
POLK CD
RDANE CO
RUTHERFORD CO
SHELBY CO
SUMNER CO
WILLIAMSON CO
WILSON CO
T S P 502
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
14901
67547
34923
447811
287748
15957
319694
13682
48425
84058
777113
85790
58108
p P
p P
p P
y
w
u
u
u
u
u
u
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
64
-------
m
65
-------
ID
o
u
CD
U)
0)
0)
IT
UJ
m
UJ
0.
UJ
en
z
M
m
<
i
D-
U.
o
in
a
LLJ
tn
o
cr
a.
66
-------
in
LLJ
H
h-
z
z>
o
u
CD
z
in
CO
m
cr
in
LU
I-
0.
UJ
in
<
<
GQ
<
h-
I—
<
I
Z
o
OJ
o
en
_
o
t/1
Q
LU
CD
_J
ID
2
O
QC
D-
67
-------
DQ
o
o
CD
z
M
<
h-
LU
Z
O
JM
O
U_
O
CO
a
LU
CD
_J
=3
2:
O
CC
cu
If)
CO
01
cc
UJ
m
UJ
a.
m
tn
68
-------
<
Q
DC
O
LL
69
-------
<
C/]
LLI
z:
Z)
o
a
CD
1 1
QT
O
1
— i
U_
i
z
o
z
DL
in
l-
LL
O
1-
in
a
UJ
h-
<
CD
O
LT
Q.
70
-------
UJ
ai
o
in
in
CD
en
lill
ss|§
LU
CE
•<
Q_
cc cr
I
CJ
LU
Q- Q. CQ LO
<
Q
DC
O
LL.
CO
LU
O
CJ
CD
z
M
z
M
I
z
o
cu
o
CO
o
h-
10
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
2!
O
GC
Q.
71
-------
LU
X
0!
in
CD
CD
8
-
T
cr tr
a. a.
<
DC
O
LU
M
h-
O
U
CD
z
o
LU
z
o
N
O
O
1-
cn
M
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
S
O
cc
D_
12
-------
CD
DC
O
LJJ
CD
73
-------
UJ
S
<
O
X
a
in
CD
m
co
UJ
in
0)
01
CD
DC
O
LU
CD
ZJ
a
u
CD
tr
UJ
o
UJ
<
i
LU
•z.
O
N
O
U.
a
en
M
_J
a
LU
CD
a
DC
a_
74
-------
o
u
11
C_> tJ
UJ fe
LU
cc
-------
1*
CJ
Z)
LU
-------
z
LU
<
Z
O
Q-
C/3
IE
CD
en
>->->->-
=3 ^ 5 n
o o o o
o " o o
LU
QC
O LU
l~" j-.i- I—
5 5 f- £
^^— ^f —y U—
^ T- ^S
§ I a 63
a. a. to cn
CJ>
LU
LU
n
I-
o
u
CD
Z
HH
<
I—
<
I
Z
o
Q.
CO
_
O
a
LU
CD
_J
o
DC
D_
10
CO
0)
tr
UJ
m
UJ
H
Q.
UJ
CO
77
-------
h-
LU
M
\/
CJ
LU
^£
CO
LLI
O
u
CD
<
I-
o
OJ
O
CO
U_
O
h-
co
M
_J
Q
tu
i—
<
CD
_J
a
DC
D.
GO
m
tr
m
ca
LU
H
a.
LU
0)
78
-------
tUi
X
o
ID
00
en
s s
fe
s
oc oc
Q- a.
1
>-
CJ
ID
UJ
CO
LU
O
CJ
CD
(-
LU
^.
O
N
O
LL
o
a
LU
I-
<
CD
o
cr
D.
in
CO
01
cr
HI
a
HI
o.
LU
U)
79
-------
LU
S
LU
LU
LU
O
CJ
in
03
m
U
CO
LLJ
Z)
o
U
CD
z
<
I-
I—
<
I
Z
O
LU S
u_
O
CO
a
LLJ
CD
O
DC
D_
in
0)
0)
ct
UJ
CD
UJ
H
0.
UJ
in
80
-------
D_
CL
M
CO
CO
CO
CO
81
-------
LLJ
Q.
tn
in
CO
en
CO
LU
1 — 1
1 1
CL
D_
i—l
10
10
Z)
O
CJ
CD
-z.
M
-z.
M
h-
1-
•z.
O
LO
C/l
Q.
LO
U.
O
CO
M
_J
Q
LU
I—
CD
_J
ID
SI
O
DC
CL
in
CD
0)
s
01
UJ
K-
Q.
UJ
82
-------
o
cr
u
cr
o
83
-------
LLJ
<
o
X
o
in
03
01
s s
UJ
5
D-
cc cc
a. a.
O
CE
CJ
X
h-
DC
O
en
LJJ
M
h-
z:
Z)
o
u
O3
z
i
z
o
z
UJ
z
o
N
O
U_
O
a
LU
H-
<
CD
O
tr
D.
V)
to
0)
•H
t£
UJ
UJ
a.
UJ
U)
84
-------
LU
i
O
CJ
IE
00
m
cr DC
0. Q-
^- \N
1
_J
O
DC
CJ
DC
O
LU
ID
O
U
CD
Z
M
o
u
LL
o
in
a
LU
cu
o
DC
D_
in
CD
01
m
2:
in
a.
m
tn
85
-------
h—1
o
QT
CJ
ID
O
CO
86
-------
LU
Q_
in
in
QD
m
••H
S
g
E ° £ °
tz "-" »-
OC
S §
s s a a
CL D_ LO LO
o
DC
CJ
o
C/]
CO
LLJ
ID
O
U
CD
h-
t-
<
I
z
o
a.
en
H-
LL
o
a
LU
CD
O
cr
Q_
87
-------
LU
3E1
<
O
X
ol
DC
EF SF
D_ d.
in
CD
en
xV x
ll
h-1
_J
O
cc
CJ
LU
z
ID
O
U
CD
Z
ID
O
in
O
z
LU
Z
O
N
O
L_
O
tn
H
a
LU
i-
<
CD
O
CE
CL
88
-------
o
DC
X
h-
Z)
O
CO
03
LJJ
ZD
O
U
CD
~Z-
M
-z.
CJ g
o
U
LJ_
o
I-
10
M
_J
a
LU
h-
<
CD
o
cr
D.
89
-------
LU
UJ
cn
L0
LU
LU
-------
LLJ
LU
in
en
LU
UJ
en
IU
o
o
CD
Z
h-
<
I
z
o
Q.
cn
Q
LU
CD
_1
13
2
O
oc
Q_
in
00
01
•H
DZ
UJ
CD
UJ
I-
D.
UJ
U)
91
-------
LLJ
Z
f-l
o
Z
OJ
o|
tn
in
CD
en
§
LLI
o
o
£ s
2 fe
fe
H l_ CJ
w
CC _
Q. Q.
a a a g
CO Ul £
UJ
LU
CD
LQ
LU
UJ
en
UJ
o
CJ
CD
O
•z.
CXJ
o
CO
Lt.
O
CO
a
LLJ
CD
_j
ID
2
O
LT
D.
10
CD
0)
IT
UJ
(D
UJ
a.
UJ
in
-------
LU
Z
HI
O
s s
CC QC
Q- Q_
in
CD
01
SN^vX
LU
LlJ
(f)
CO
LU
LiJ
LU
M
I-
2
ID
O
CJ
CD
2
M
I
2
O
UJ
2
O
N
O
LL
o
h-
U)
Q
LlJ
CD
_l
ID
Q
DC
Q.
in
CD
0)
•H
tr
UJ
CD
ui
Q.
UJ
93
-------
LU
f-
o
t-J
in
00
01
•cH
ii
££
£-
??; •<
tr cr
a. a.
LU
LU
CO
in
LU
LU
UJ
LU
a
u
LD
Z
Z
o
o
o
LJ_
o
a
LLJ
CD
O
LT
Q_
in
o
0)
ct
UJ
CD
UJ
H
a.
UJ
94
-------
Region V
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region V
230 South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60604
(312)353-2211
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
ILLINOIS
COUNTY
COOK CO
DE KALB CO
DU PftSE CO
6RUNDY CO
JO DftVIESS CO
KAf€ CO
KANKAKEE CO
KENDALL CO
LAKE CO
LA SALLE CO
MCLEAN CO
MACON CO
MACOUPIN CO
MADISON CO
MASSACCO
HENARD CO
MONROE CO
PEDRIfi CO
ROCK ISLAND CO
ST CLAIR CO
SANGAMON CO
TAZEWELL CO
HHITESIDE CO
HILL CO
WILLIAMSON CO
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO NQ2 0 Z
5253655
74624
£58829
26525
23520
278485
102926
37202
440372
112033
119149
131375
49384
247661
14990
11700
20117
200466
165968
267531
161335
132078
65970
324460
56538
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P-
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FDR
INDIANA
COUNTY
CLARK CO
DEARBORN CO
DUBQIS CO
ELKHART CO
FLOYD CO
LAKE CO
LA PORTE CO
MARION CO
PORTER CO
ST JOSEPH CO
VANDERBUR6H CO
VIGO CO
UAYNE CO
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
88838
34291
34238
137330
61205
522965
108632
765233
119816
241617
167515
112385
76058
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
U
U
P
P
P
U
U
U
U
U
U
95
U - THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
RS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT flIR QUftLITY STANDARDS
FOR
MICHIGAN
COUNTY
flLLE6AN CO
BflRRY CO
BAY CO
BERRIEN CO
BRANCH CO
CALHOUN CO
CftSS CO
CLINTON CO
DELTfl CO
EATON CO
GENESEE CO
6RATIDT CO
HILLSDALE CO
HURON CO
imw co
IONIA CO
JACKSON CO
KALAMAZOO CO
KENT CO
LAPEER CO
LENAIEE CO
LIVINBSTON CO
NACOKB CO
MANISTEE CO
MARQUETTE CO
MIDLAND CO
MONROE CO
KONTCALM CO
MJSKEGON CO
OAKLAND CO
OTTAWA CO
SAGINAU CO
ST CLAIR CO
ST JOSEPH CO
SANILAC CO
SHIAWASSEE CO
TUSCOLA CO
VAN BUREN CO
UftSHTENAH CO
UAYNE CO
T S P SOS
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
U
W
U
y
u
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
V
u
u
u
W
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
W
u
u
u
81555
45781
119881
171276
40188
141557
49499
55893
38947
88337
450449
40448
42071
36459
275520
51815
151495
212378
444506
70038
B9948
100289
23019
74101
73576
134659
47555
157589
1011793
157174
228059
138802
56083
40789
71140
56961
66814
264748
2337891
P
P
P
P
P P
P
P
P P
P
P
P
P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
96
-------
ftS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NOTIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
MINNESOTA
COUNTY
flNOKA CO
BENTDN CO
CARVER CO
DAKOTA CO
GOODHUE CO
HENNEPIN CO
ITfSCfl CD
KOOCHICHIN6 CO
GLMSTED CO
RAMSEY CO
ST LOUIS CO
scon co
SHERBURNE CO
STEARNS CO
WSHIN6TON CO
POPULATION
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
195996
25187
37846
194279
38749
941411
43889
17571
92006
459784
222229
43764
29906
108161
113571
P
P
P
P P
P
P
P P
P P
P
U
U
U
U
P
U
U
U
CD NQ2 0 Z
W
P
U
U
P
U
P
U
P
P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
97
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1385
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOP
OHIO
COUNTY
A3HTABULA CO
BELMONT CO
BUTLER CO
CLARK CO
CLERMONT CO
CLINTON CO
COLUKBIANA CO
CUYAH06A CO
DELAWARE CO
FRANKLIN CO
SALLIflCO
GEAUGACO
GREENE CO
HAMILTON CO
JACKSON CO
JEFFERSON CO
LAKE CO
LAURENCE CO
LICKING CO
LOGAN CO
LDRfllNCO
LUCAS CO
MAHDNINGCO
MEDINA CO
MIAMI CO
MONROE CO
MONTGOMERY CO
MORGAN CO
MUSKIN6UM CO
PORTAGE CO
PREBLECO
RICHLAND CO
SANDUSKYCO
SCIOTD CO
SENECA CO
STARK CO
SUMMIT CO
TRUMBULL CO
TUSCARAWAS CO
UARREN CO
T S P SOS
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
U
y
U
U
U
U U
U
U U
U
U
U U
104215
62569
£58787
150236
128483
34603
113572
1498400
53B46
869132
3W98
74474
129769
873224
30592
91564
212801
63849
120981
39155
274909
471741
289487
113150
90381
17382
571697
14241
83340
135856
38223
131205
63267
84545
61901
378823
524472
241863
84614
99276
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
U
P
P
P
P
P
U
U
P
P
P
P
P
P
U
U
P
P
P
P
U
U
P
U
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
w
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U « THE UHOLE COUNTY
98
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NOTIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FDR
OHIO
COUNTY
WASHINGTON CO
WYANDOT CO
POPULATION
64266
22651
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
W P
U
CO N02 0 Z
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
WISCONSIN
COUNTY
BROWN CO
DANE CO
DOUGLAS CO
KENOSHA CO
MANITOHOC CO
MARATHON CO
MILWAUKEE CO
OZAUKEE CO
RACINE CO
ROCK CO
SHEBOY6AN CO
UAUKESHA CO
UIMOAGO CO
WOOD CO
POPULATION
175280
323545
44421
123137
82918
111278
qcAQAA
2v"f TOO
66981
173132
139420
1W935
280088
131722
72799
T S P
PRIM
P
SEC
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
S
PRIM
P
P
P
P
0 2
SEC
CO N02 0 Z
U
U
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
H = THE WHOLE COUNTY
99
-------
LQ
I—I
O
_J
_J
\—\
100
-------
UJ
<
o
in
CO
en
o 3
LU
DC
£ fe
P S £ i-
z i$ fcp cc
t-l HH CJ CJ
OC CC UJ UJ
QL Q. CD CO
CO
hH
O
_J
CO
UJ
M
I-
Z
Z)
o
o
CD
Z
l-l
z
1-1
<
I-
h-
I
z
o
CL
tn
u_
o
a
LU
CO
_l
•D
2:
o
cr
o.
in
CO
en
cc
UJ
ID
UJ
a.
UJ
U)
101
-------
CO
M
O
_l
__!
I—I
03
LLJ
Z)
o
u
CD
<
i-
f-
<
i
z
o
CV1
o
en
u_
o
a
UJ
CD
_l
Z3
2
O
DC
Q.
in
0)
01
tr
UJ
m
UJ
i-
Q.
Ill
in
102
-------
LU
<
O
X
O
in
GO
en
oc oc
Q- Q.
U)
UJ
in
o
a\
Z)
O
U
CD
tr
UJ
CD
UJ
Q.
UJ
U)
O
_J
_J
O
•z.
UJ
z
O
N
O
Q
UJ
CD
_l
Z3
2:
O
GC
Q.
103
-------
GO
hH
o
(J)
LU
o
u
CD
M
<
o
o
o
K
cn
H
_l
d
LU
I—
<
CD
O
DC
D_
in
00
01
DC
m
m
m
i-
Q.
LU
U)
104
-------
Q
105
-------
I—I
Q
CO
LLJ
Z)
o
CD
•z.
M
2
O
CL
in
o
I-
co
a
LJJ
i-
<
CD
_J
ID
S
O
GC
Q.
in
CD
01
tr
ui
CD
UJ
H
D.
UJ
Ul
106
-------
CO
LU
n
h-
o
o
CD
in
CD
01
cc
111
m
Q.
lil
t/1
<
i-
Q
CXJ
o
CO
u.
o
CO
M
_J
Q
LU
CD
_J
ID
2
O
DC
Q.
107
-------
LLJ
<
O
in
00
OT
II
5 "
£fe
cc cr
Q- D.
(f)
LLJ
in
ID
01
Z)
o
CJ
CD
tr
in
to
UJ
Q.
UJ
Q
<
h-
h-
<
I
Z
O
LU
•z.
o
o
i-
tn
a
UJ
CD
_J
Z)
2:
o
CE
CL
108
-------
UJ
O
z
O
LJ
ID
00
m
s
UJ
DC
LU
OC OC
a. a.
in
UJ
o
u
CD
in
GO
tn
it
UJ
CD
UJ
a.
UJ
in
a
o
o
o
O
a
UJ
CD
z:
o
OC
Q-
109
-------
CD
h-1
X
CJ
110
-------
LU
<
z
o
0.
cn
ID
CO
cn
isa
CJ ° CJ °
E
oc
O-
<
CD
X
CJ
LU
o
u
CD
in
CD
0)
i
z
o
Q_
t/]
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
2:
O
DC
D-
111
-------
<
CD
X
CJ
C/3
LU
M
Z)
o
u
CD
-z.
I
•z.
o
•z.
LLJ
-z.
o
N
O
U_
O
a
LU
CD
_j
ID
2:
O
cr
a.
in
CO
0)
112
-------
LU
o
CJ
in
co
en
3 I
CJ "
T
DC
-------
o
LO
LU
114
-------
LU
S
Z
a.
CO
ID
CD
cn
>->->->- CD
f_ I- {_ I- CJ
O
P £ £ i- S
Z 5 ^ DC t/J
f T S 2 «
S g p i 5
£ £ H H g
I—
O
C/l
LU
LlJ
H
h-
Z
ID
O
O
CD
H
O
Q.
cn
I—I •-
u_
o
a
LLJ
CD
O
OC
Q.
in
ao
m
tr
UJ
in
ai
i-
Q.
in
U)
115
-------
O
C/D
LU
CO
LLJ
o
u
CD
M
<
O
OJ
o
CO
LL
o
h-
co
d
LLJ
h-
<
CD
2:
o
cr
0.
m
CD
(71
•H
CE
UJ
CD
III
h-
0.
UJ
0)
1 16
-------
UJ
2
O
LT
CL
\n
CD
en
a:
UJ
m
UJ
a.
ui
en
-------
o
X
o
118
-------
>->->->- o
O
X
O
en
LLJ
ZD
O
u
CD
o
Q.
LQ
U_
O
cn
l-l
d
LU
CD
O
LT
Q_
in
GO
01
DC
HI
m
UJ
h-
Q.
01
03
119
-------
z
LLJ
<
I—
I—
<
C\J
o
in
in
CD
CD
O
X
o
en
IU
M
ID
O
CD
CD
Z
H
Z
M
I—
<
I
Z
o
(XI
o
CO
o
Q
LU
CD
_1
ID
2
O
cr
a.
in
CD
ffl
n
ID
m
UJ
i-
n.
LU
120
-------
LU
2
<
O
X
O
OC CC
Q. Q.
in
CD
en
O
hH
X
O
LU
z
ID
O
u
ID
Z
M
\
z
O
z
LU
Z
O
N
O
LU
O
Cfl
Q
LU
CD
_l
Z)
2
O
CC
Q.
\a
oo
at
CC
W
CD
HI
Q.
HI
121
-------
o
X
o
in
LLJ
ID
O
CJ
CD
o
z:
o
u
LL
O
CO
M
Q
LlJ
I—
<
CD
O
DC
CL
in
CD
01
•H
EC
UJ
CD
2:
HI
H
D.
UJ
U)
122
-------
C/D
O
U
Ul
123
-------
z
LU
o
2
O.
cn
in
CD
en
I—I
CO
O
CJ
LO
LU
H
Z)
o
CJ
CD
in
CD
0)
<
I
U_
O
in
d
LU
^-
<
CD
O
DC
0.
124
-------
M
CO
O
CJ
CO
UJ
M
l-
z
Z)
o
u
CD
z:
M
I
•z.
o
z:
CO
LL
O
CO
a
UJ
CD
_J
Z)
2!
O
DC
£L
in
o
0)
125
-------
UJ
X
o
in
oo
on
I
UJ
!§
LU
I
cc oc
Q- Ql
in
o
01
O
CJ
in
ID
O
U
03
M
O
LLJ
Z
O
N
O
Li.
O
a
LU
CD
O
DC
CL
126
-------
Region VI
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region VI
First International Building
1201 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75270
(214)767-8950
-------
flS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
fill COUNTIES MEET THE
NATIONAL AKBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
ARKANSAS
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
LOUISIANA
T S P S 0 2
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
ASCENSION PAR 50068 W
BEAURE6ARD PAR 296% U
BOSSIER PAR 80721 U
CADDOPAR 25235B U
CALCASIEU PAR 167223 U
EAST BATON ROUGE PAR 366191 U
6RANT PAR 16703 U
IBERVILLE PAR 32159 U
JEFFERSON PAR 454592 U
LAFAYETTE PAR 150017 U
LAFOURCHE PAR 824B3 U
ORLEANS PAR 557927 U
POINTE COUPEE PAR 24045 H
ST BERNARD PAR 64097 U
ST CHARLES PAR 37259 U
ST JAMES PAR 21495 U
ST JOHN THE BAPTIST PAR 31924 U
ST MARY PAR 64253 U
WEST BATON ROUGE PAR 19086 U
P = PART OF THE COUNTY U - THE WHOLE COUNTY
127
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NEU MEXICO
COUNTY
BERNALILLO CO
GRANT CO
T S P SOS
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
419788
26284
P P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
OKLAHOMA
COUNTY
HAYES CO
OKLAHOMA CO
TULSA CO
POPULATION
T S P SOS
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
CD ND2 0 Z
32261 P
568933 P
478593 P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
TEXAS
COUNTY
BRAZORIA CO
CAMERON CD
DALLAS CO
EL PASO CO
BftLVESTONCO
GRE66 CO
HARRIS CO
JEFFERSON CO
NUECES CO
ORANGE CO
TARRANT CO
VICTORIA CO
POPULATION
T S P
PRIM SEC
SOS
PRIM SEC
169587
289727
1556398
479899
195948
99495
2489547
258938
268215
83838
A&AAAA
ODvOOV
68887
P
P
P P
P
CD N02 0 I
U
U
U
U
w
y
u
u
u
u
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
128
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
CO
I—I
ID
O
129
-------
LU
S
O
T
X
0
ID
00
cn
in
LJJ
M
Ul
ID
O
_J
Z)
a
u
CD
<
h-
h-
<
I
z
O
Z
LU
Z
O
N
O
LL
O
cn
M
a
LU
CD
_l
13
^.
O
DC
Q.
130
-------
o
C_3
f-H
X
LLJ
LLJ
131
-------
o
CJ
I—I
X
LU
UJ
CO
LU
H
H-
O
u
LD
h-
h-
CL
in
u_
o
en
a
LU
CD
_1
ID
21
a
cr
a.
in
ID
a\
n
UJ
to
UJ
132
-------
O
CJ
I—I
X
LU
LiJ
en
LD
ID
o
u
CD
H
<
H
t-
<
I
Z
O
ai
o
CO
u_
o
a
LU
CD
O
EC
Q.
in
to
en
133
-------
LLJ
O
z
in
CD
en
11
§ S
-
UJ
Q_
cc DC
D- D-
O
LJ
X
LLJ
LU
en
LU
i—i
I—
O
u
CD
O
O
u
O
I—
Ul
a
LU
CD
O
CE
a.
in
CD
01
•H
EC
UJ
CD
2.
OJ
134
-------
o
X
o
135
-------
o
I
_J
^
o
U)
LU
ID
O
U
CJD
I
z
o
CL
CO
O
h-
tn
a
LLJ
CD
O
CL
CL
in
o
0)
cr
UJ
m
tu
a
UJ
en
136
-------
LU
Z
Z
X
O
in
CD
en
s s
LU
cr
O
cc cr
D- O.
ll
O
o
UD
LU
M
O
u
CD
<
h-
h-
<
I
a
o
L_
O
CO
M
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
2
O
LT
CL
\n
GO
01
vl
tr
LU
CD
LU
a.
LU
U)
137
-------
o
u
II
a fe
I
IT)
CO
CD
O
<
_J
o
CD
LJJ
Z)
Q
U
tD
H
h-
I-
<
O
u
LL
o
I-
cn
a
LU
h-
<
CD
O
cc
Q.
in
CO
m
£
CD
UJ
Q.
HI
138
-------
CO
X
LLJ
139
-------
LO
X
LLJ
to
LU
I—1
o
CJ
CD
M
<
h-
t-
<
I
z
o
Q-
LD
U.
O
1-
cn
a
LU
CD
_!
ID
:z
a
cr
Q_
in
CO
01
•H
H
ID
m
LU
h-
O.
tlJ
140
-------
X
a
in
oo
m
3 S
£ fe
li
i-i fn
DC CC
0- E
in
LLJ
\n
o
0)
LO
X
LJ
o
u
CD
z
I-H
-z.
a
LU
z
o
N
O
Lu
o
\-
in
a
LU
CD
_l
ID
S
O
tr
o_
141
-------
CO
X
LU
10
LU
M
O
a
en
M
<
i
z
a
a
a
u_
a
H
a
QJ
h-
<
CD
O
CE
Q.
in
CD
m
142
-------
Region VII
Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region VII
726 Minnesota Ave.
Kansas City, Kansas 66101
(913)236-2893
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
ICWfl
COUNTY
BLOCK HAUK CO
CERRO GORDO CO
CLINTON CO
LINN CO
MARSHALL CO
KUSCATINE CO
POLK CO
POTTAHflTTAHIE CO
SCOTT CO
WEBSTER CO
UOODBURYCO
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIX SEC PRIM SEC CO NQ2 0 Z
137961
48458
57122
169775
41652
40436
383173
86561
160822
45953
100884
P
P P
P
P
P
P
P P
P
P
P
P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
KANSAS
COUNTY
DOUGLAS CO
JOHNSON CO
SED6WICK CO
SHAHNEE CO
HYANDOTTE CO
POPULATION
6764«
270269
367086
154916
172335
T S P
PRIM SEC
S 0 2
PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
U
U
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U - THE WHOLE COUNTY
143
-------
ftS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
MISSOURI
COUNTY
BUCHANAN CO
CLAY CO
FRANKLIN CO
JACKSON CO
JEFFERSON CO
NEW MADRID CO
PLflTTE CO
ST CHARLES CO
ST LOUIS CO
ST LOUIS
T S P SOS
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
87888
136488
71233
689266
146183
22945
46341
144107
973896
453085
P P
P
P
P
P P
P P
U
U
U
U
W
U
U
U
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NEBRASKA
COUNTY
CASS CO
DOUGLAS CO
LANCASTER CO
SARPY CO
POPULATION
28297
397038
192884
86015
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
P P
P
C 0 N02 0 Z
P
P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
144
-------
O
hH
145
-------
O
LU
<
O
Q.
tn
s s
in
03
en
LU
O
U
CD
Z
M
Z
M
<
•z.
o
z:
D.
C/5
H-
CO
Q
LU
t-
<
CD
O
DC
a.
01
a
en
ISP^
1^1?
llll
^\\^x
^N^^
\
in
CD
01
•rt
Ct
LLI
CD
IU
a.
UJ
en
146
-------
o
CO
LU
M
O
u
CD
o
CJ
LL
O
Q
LU
CD
_J
O
DC
D_
in
00
a>
DC
uj
m
z
UJ
H
Q.
UJ
U)
147
-------
CO
<
10
z
<
148
-------
C/D
CO
z
<
-------
(f)
<
(f)
LU
M
I-
z
ID
O
u
CD
Z
M
Z
\
Z
O
z
LU
Z
O
N
O
O
I-
tn
a
LU
CD
O
DC
CL
tn
oo
a>
tr
LU
CD
LU
a.
LU
w
150
-------
QJ
o
CJ
ID
CD
cn
il
LU t
CO
Ul
z
<
CD
LU
o
u
CD
z
I-H
<
h-
I
z
o
o
o
LL
O
C/)
M
d
LU
CD
_J
O
DC
CL
in
00
0)
m
u
h-
Q.
LU
U)
151
-------
O
(Jl
in
152
-------
DC
ID
O
01
CO
LU
Z)
O
O
CD
Z
M
\
Z
o
Q.
in
Li.
o
h-
co
a
LJJ
\-
<
CD
O
DC
Q.
a.
til
in
153
-------
UJ
<
o
X
o
in
GO
en
ss
1
O)
LU
o
CD
i — I
1 '
o
u
CD
N
O
u_
o
a
UJ
CD
_J
Z)
Z
O
tr
D.
U)
154
-------
LU
Zi
CD
a
0
ID
CD
m
s s
LU 5;
tr cr
a. a.
O
LO
m
CD
LU
ID
O
U
CO
z
M
z
M
\
z
O
O
O
O
h-
tn
a
LU
CD
_i
ID
:E
o
DC
Q_
Q.
UJ
01
155
-------
CO
DC
CD
UJ
156
-------
LLJ
•s.
z
Z
o
Q.
Cfl
in
CD
en
W ° £ fe
T
S:
QJ
he i_: }= iy
.^ --^- U. CO
9- UJ n[ ca
4r I I _
to en
LO
CT
DQ
LU
03
UJ
O
O
CD
I
Z
o
z
CL
h-
cn
a
LU
CD
O
CC
a.
U)
GO
0)
cr
LU
CD
z
UJ
H
a.
ui
en
157
-------
z
LU
<
z
o
o
o
ID
GO
01
U_ U_
Z
-------
Region VIII
Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region VIII
999 18th Street-Suite 1300
Denver, Colorado 80295
(303)293-1753
-------
ftS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NOTIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
COLORADO
COUNTY
ADAMS CO
ARAPAHOE CO
BOULDER CO
DENVER CD
DOUGLAS CO
EL PASO CO
JEFFERSON CO
LARIMER CO
MESA CO
HELD CO
T S P 502
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
245944
293621
189E25
492365
25153
389424
371753
149164
81530
123438
P
P
U
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
U
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
U
P
COUNTIES NOT HEETIN6 THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
MONTANA
COUNTY
CASCADE CO
FLAT HEAD CO
LEWIS AND CLARK CO
MISSOULA CO
ROSEBUD CO
SILVER BOW CO
YELLOWSTONE CO
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
P P
806%
51966
43839
76016
9899
38892
108035
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
ALL COUNTIES MEET THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NORTH DAKOTA
P - PART OF THE COUNTY
W* THE WHOLE COUNTY
159
-------
ftS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT SIR QUflLITY STANDARDS
FOR
SOUTH DAKOTA
T S P SOS
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
PENNINGTDN CO 76361 P
COUNTIES NOT HEETINB THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
UTAH
T S P S 0 2
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
DAVIS CO 146548 U
SALT LAKE CO 619066 PUP U
TDOELECO 26833 P
UTAH CO 21B106 P P
1OER CO 144616 P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
WYOMING
T S P S 0 2
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
SWEETHATER CO 41723 P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY . W « THE WHOLE COUNTY
160
-------
o
Q
DC
O
O
CJ
161
-------
in
LLJ
z
ID
O
CJ
CD
O 5
Q 2
cr
o
o
CJ
I
z
o
Q.
LO
U_
O
1-
tn
M
a
LU
CD
_J
ID
2:
o
tr
Q.
162
-------
UJ
Z
X
o
in
GO
m
in
LU
Z)
o
u
CD
-z.
o
Q
-------
o
Q
in
UJ
M
O
u
CD
i—i
DC
O
O
CJ
o
z
o
CJ
LL
O
a
LLJ
CD
_)
ID
:z
o
cr
a.
164
-------
<
z
<
o
165
-------
LLJ
<
O
0_
in
ID
03
Ol
§1
o o
>- CD
1- CJ
S u_
CD
LU
H
LU
CJ
° %
* £
LU
I
CJ I—
o Q-
DC
-4
Q.
H ,", S
£ §E Hj L^ £
I—
Z
O
17]
UJ
Z)
O
U
CD
<
I-
h-
<
I
o
a.
01
LJ_
o
h-
cn
a
LU
h-
<
CD
_J
Z)
2
O
LT
Q.
in
CO
0)
cc
LU
CD
LU
a.
LU
in
166
-------
<
h-
CD
tn
LLJ
Z)
o
u
CD
•z.
M
2
I-
•z.
O
-z.
OJ
o
en
u.
o
CO
M
_J
a
LU
CD
_1
ID
2
O
cc
Q.
If)
CD
01
CE
UJ
CO
UJ
a.
UJ
en
167
-------
LU
•s.
Z
I-H
CJ
a
°
o
in
CO
<
O
01
ID
M
H-
Z
ZJ
o
CJ
CD
Z
M
Z
M
<
I
O
u
LL
o
a
LLJ
CD
_l
ID
2
O
GC
Q.
in
o
tn
UJ
m
UJ
t-
o.
Ul
168
-------
o
Q
X
ID
O
00
169
-------
o
Q
ID
O
LO
en
LU
z:
ID
O
U
CD
h-
o
Q_
CO
LL
o
en
H
_J
Q
LU
CD
_J
O
DC
D_
m
oo
01
CE
LU
CD
LU
I-
Q.
LU
U)
170
-------
<
I—
171
-------
<
CO
LU
ID
O
O
CD
Z
M
o
z
a.
u_
o
a
LU
\-
<
CD
O
GC
Q.
in
CO
0)
tr
in
ca
HI
H
o.
OJ
U)
172
-------
in
UJ
M
i-
z
ID
O
CJ
CD
in
CD
01
tr
UJ
tn
s
UJ
Q.
UJ
in
< i
o
ai
o
en
LL
o
en
M
a
LLJ
h-
<
CD
O
OC
Q.
173
-------
i
X
o
in
GO
en
II
II
in
LU
(0
-------
IE
<
CO
LU
H
I—
z
ID
O
CJ
CD
z
M
t-
O
O
O
Lu
O
CO
M
a
LU
CD
_l
Z)
2
O
DC
Q.
Ifl
CD
01
CE
UJ
m
s:
w
i-
0.
HI
U)
175
-------
O
>-
176
-------
CD
O
>-
I
CD
UJ
M
J-
o
CJ
CD
Z
M
Z
M
t-
I—
-------
-------
Region IX
American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada, Northern Mariana Islands
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region IX
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, California 94105
(415)974-8058
-------
fiS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
ARIZONA
COUNTY
COCHISE CO
GILA CO
6REENLEE CO
MARICQPA CO
WVftJO CO
PIMA CO
PINAL CO
T S P SOS
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N0£ 0 Z
85686
37068
11406
1509268
67629
531443
90916
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
CALIFORNIA
COUNTY
ALAMEDA CO
BUTTE CO
CONTRA COSTA CO
EL DORADO CO
FRESNO CO
IMPERIAL CD
KERN CO
KINGS CO
LOS ANGELES CO
MADERA CO
HARIN CO
MERCED CO
MONTEREY CO
NAPA CO
ORANGE CO
PLACER CO
RIVERSIDE CO
SACRAMENTO CO
SAN BENITO CO
SAN BERNARDINO CO
SAN DIEGO CD
SAN FRANCISCO CO
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
1185379
143851
656360
65612
514229
92110
403089
73736
7477503
63116
OOO^QO
CCCDTC
134556
290444
99199
1932709
117247
663199
763381
25005
895016
1361846
678974
U
P
U
P
U
u
u
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p p
p
p
u u
p
p p
p
p p
p
u
u
y
u
p
u
y
p
y
u
y
u
y
u
y
u
p
p
y
u
p
u
u
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
178
-------
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1965
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT ftIP QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
CALIFORNIA
COUNTY
POPULATION
T S P 502
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
CO N02 0 Z
SAN JOflQUJN CO
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO
SAN MATED CO
SANTA BARBARA CO
SANTfl CLARA CO
SANTA CRUZ CO
SOLANO CO
SONOMA CO
STANISLAUS CO
SUTTER CO
TULARECO
VENTURA CO
YOLO CD
YUBA CO
AS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
347342
155435
587329
298694
1295871
188141
235203
299681
265966
52246
245738
529174
113374
49733
H
P
U
U
P
COUNTY
HONOLULU CO
MAUI CO
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
HAWAII
POPULATION
762565
70847
T S P S 0 2
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
P
P P
COUNTIES NOT MEETIN6 THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
NEVADA
P
P
P
P
P
P
W
P
W
U
U
P
U
U
U
P
U
U
CO N02 0 Z
COUNTY
CHURCHILL CO
CLARK CO
DOUGLAS CO
ELKOCO
EUREKA CO
HUMBDLDT CO
LANDER CO
LYON CO
MINERAL CO
STOREY CO
WASHOECO
WHITE PINE CO
CARSON CITY
T S P S 0 2
POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
13917
463887
19421
17269
1198
9434
4076
13594
6217
1503
193623
8167
32022
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
179
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
o
M
<
180
-------
LU
M
h-
z
=D
O
LJ
CD
I-
o
N
hH
cr
<
<
i
z
0
z
Li-
en
H-
LL
o
1—
en
_J
a
LU
CD
O
CE
Q.
in
CD
01
tr
UJ
CD
UJ
H
Q.
UJ
01
181
-------
C/}
LU
M
t-
z
ID
O
CJ
CD
z
o
N
i — i
i i
nr
i i_
<
i-
i—
<
i
z
o
z
CXI
o
CO
LL
o
CO
a
LU
CD
_l
ID
2
O
DC
D_
Ifl
00
01
Tl
I
UJ
m
m
i-
Q.
HI
0)
182
-------
in
00
en
o
M
\—{
QC
i
z
o
z
LJJ
Z
o
N
O
u_
o
I-
co
a
UJ
CD
_J
O
DC
Q_
DC
UJ
m
UJ
i-
a.
UJ
w
183
-------
in
UJ
\n
00
01
en
UJ
o
N
<
O
u
CD
<
I
O
CJ
h-
cn
a
LU
CD
O
DC
CL
HI
H
Q.
LU
U)
184
-------
185
-------
a:
o
u_
<
CJ
CO
UJ
M
I—
z
ID
O
O
CD
z
M
M F.
h-
<
I
Z
O
z
a.
en
u_
o
f-
CO
a
LU
CD
_J
ZJ
S
O
or
Q.
in
00
01
•H
CE
UJ
CD
UJ
a.
UJ
0)
186
-------
UJ
<
o
X!
O
Is
in
CD
en
I
w
UJ
Z)
o
CJ
CD
in
CD
0)
rl
s
ID
UJ
I-
Q.
It)
in
DC
O
LL
<
CJ
o
LU
2
O
Nl
O
LL
O
CO
M
Q
LU
CO
_J
ID
2
O
tr
Cu
187
-------
LU
z
l-l
D
Z
o
LJ
in
CD
en
s s
fe
cc oc
Q- o_
cc
o
LL
i—i
<
CJ
01
LU
O
U
CD
o
o
CJ
LL
O
CO
M
a
LU
i—
<
CD
O
cr
o_
in
CD
en
•H
EC
UJ
m
s
HI
h-
0.
UJ
10
188
-------
LU
ij
CM
ID
00
en
II
IX
-------
-------
hH
<
CO
LU
M
ID
O
U
CD
M
h-
h-
<
I
Z
O
OJ
O
en
LL
O
I—
CO
M
Q
LU
h-
<
CO
CO
en
tr
UJ
m
2:
UJ
H
O.
Ill
to
O
DC
Q-
191
-------
<
Q
<
LU
192
-------
01
LLJ
ID
O
a
CD
z
to
CO
0)
cc
UJ
m
UJ
»-
a
UJ
ui
<
LU
z
O
z;
Q.
Cfl
O
H-
cn
a
UJ
CD
_l
Z)
:z
o
oc
Q.
193
-------
CO
LU
M
ID
o
CJ
CD
z:
117
CD
cn
cc
LU
CD
LU
H
Q.
LU
Q
LU
O
2
OJ
O
CO
LL
o
CO
M
_J
a
UJ
CD
_J
o
CE
a.
194
-------
Q
LLJ
in
ID
M
I-
o
u
CD
z
M
<
t-
I-
o
z
LJJ
z
o
rsi
o
o
I-
a
LU
t-
<
CD
o
CE
D.
in
CD
01
a.
01
m
in
H
Q.
OJ
U)
195
-------
<
o
in
GO
en
S
<
<
>
LU
en
LU
o
u
CD
z
M
<
\
o
CJ
a
LU
CD
_J
Z3
:s
o
cr
a.
U)
00
at
cc
tu
m
UJ
a.
UJ
U)
196
-------
Region X
Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington
Air Programs Branch
EPA Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206)442-4198
-------
flS OF SEPTEMBER 1985
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
ALASKA
T S P S 0 2
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
ANCHORAGE ED 174431 P
FAIRBANKS ED 53983 P
COUNTIES NOT NEETIN6 THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
IDAHO
T S P S 0 2
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
ADA CO 173836 P
BANNOCK CO £5421 P
CARIBOU CO 8695 P
KEZ PERCE CO 33220 P
POWER CO 6844 P
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
OREGON
T S P S 0 2
COUNTY POPULATION PRIM SEC PRIM SEC CO N02 0 Z
CLACKAMflS CO 241911 P P
JACKSON CO 132456 P P P
LANE CO 275226 P P
MARION CO 204692 P P
MULTNOMAH CO 562646 P P P
POLK CO 45203 P P
WASHINGTON CO 245860 P P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY 197 U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
-------
ftS OF SEPTEMBER 19B5
COUNTIES NOT MEETING THE
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
FOR
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
ftSDTINCO
CLARK CO
COM.ITZ CO
KIN8 CO
PIERCE CO
SNOHOMISH CO
SPOKANE CO
YAKIMA CO
POPULATION
16823
192227
79548
1269749
485667
337720
341635
172508
T S P SOS
PRIM SEC PRIM SEC
P
P
P
P P
P
CO N02 0 Z
P
P
P
P
P = PART OF THE COUNTY
U = THE WHOLE COUNTY
198
-------
C/J
<
_J
UJ
I—I
Z)
o
u
CD
M
O
Z
O
CJ
u_
o
tn
Q
UJ
t-
<
CD
_J
ID
Z
O
CE
Q.
in
CD
m
cr
UJ
m
UJ
i-
o.
UJ
\
199
-------
o
Q
200
-------
O
X
Q
M
i
in
OJ
M
I-
2
Q
U
CD
2
M
<
I-
<
I
O
Q.
Ul
h-
Lu
O
h-
W
M
-J
a
LU
to
-I
O
cr
a.
to
CD
0)
£
i
1U
a.
UJ
0)
201
-------
in
LJJ
z:
ID
O
O
CD
Z
U)
to
01
DC
UJ
m
UJ
Q.
UJ
0)
o
X
Q
o
u
u_
o
CO
a
UJ
CD
_l
Z>
2:
O
ex
Q.
202
-------
z:
o
CJD
LLJ
DC
O
203
-------
O
CD
UJ
DC
O
CO
LLJ
O
U
CD
z
in
CD
0)
z
O
Q_
tn
u_
o
en
a
LU
CD
_J
O
DC
CL
204
-------
UJ
z
S S
££
cr
LU
in
CD
en
O
CD
LU
CE
UJ
M
Z)
o
u
CD
IO
CD
Ol
o
•z.
LU
-z.
00
N
O
O
H
CO
a
UJ
CD
_J
ID
2
O
EC
CL
205
-------
LU
ol
a
ID
03
O1
II
V o
t fe
o: tr
a. a:
in
UJ
O
CJ
CD
in
CO
01
^
o
CD
LU
cr
o
<
h-
t—
<
1
z
0
2
o
CJ
LL
0
t~
in
a
LU
CD
_l
ZJ
2
Q
cr
o_
206
-------
o
h-
CJD
(—I
LO
<
207
-------
>->->->-
O
h-
CD
X
LO
208
-------
o
h~
CD
IE
Ul
CO
LU
ID
O
U
CD
-z.
o
•z.
LLJ
Z
O
ISI
o
o
CO
Q
LLJ
CD
_J
O
cc
D.
209
-------
O
I—
CD
Z
I—I
<
o
a
in
CO
an
LU
Z)
O
t£>
2
M
z
M
<
f-
I
z:
o
o
u
u_
o
Q
LU
C£)
_)
ID
^
O
GC
0.
S
z a-
UJ g
tr cc
Q- a.
210
-------
APPENDIX
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. O C 20460
APR 2 ^ 1983
OFFICE OF
AIR. NOISE, AND RADIATION
Section 107 Designation Policy Summary
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM: 'Sheldon Meyers, Director
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (ANR-443)
TO: Director, Air and Waste Management Division
Regions II-IV, VI-VIII, X
Director, Air Management Division
Regions I, V, IX
On February 3, 1983, the Agency published a Federal Register notice
regarding the status of all areas designated nonattainment under Part D
of the Clean Air Act. This notice indicated that for a significant
number of nonattainment areas States are anticipated to be able to
demonstrate attainment of the primary national ambient air quality standards.
Accordingly, for those areas, States have been encouraged to update their
Section 107 designations. In addition, a number of nonattainment areas were
identified in the February 3, 1983, notice as "unlikely to attain standards."
The Federal Register also stated that the basic existing policy will generally
be continued for redesignation. This memorandum summarizes and clarifies
existing policy for reviewing designations and provides new guidance on
processing these actions.
Policy For Reviewing 107 Designations
1. Data: In general, all available information relative to the attainment
status of the area should be reviewed. These data should include the most
recent eight (8) consecutive quarters of quality assured, representative
ambient air quality data plus evidence of an implemented control strategy
that EPA had fully approved. Supplemental information, including air
quality modeling emissions data, etc., should be used to determine if
the monitoring data accurately characterize the worst case air quality
in the area. Also, the following items can be considered in special
situations.
An attainment designation can be made using only the most recent four (4)
Quarters of ambient data if an acceptable state of the art modeling analysis
(such as city-specific EKMA for ozone) is provided showing that the basic
SIP strategy is sound and that actual, enforceable emission reductions are
responsible for the recent air quality improvement.
211
-------
For nonattainment designations which were originally based solely on
modeling, redesignation to attainment is possible even if less than four (4)
quarters of ambient data are available provided that a reference modeling
analysis considering the sources' legal emission limits shows attainment of
the standards. Information must also be presented showing that the sources
causing the problem are in compliance with the enforceable SIP measures.
Although the current ozone standard implies the need for three years
of data for attainment designations, two years of data with no exceedances
is an acceptable surrogate. As discussed previously, this should be
accompanied by evidence of an implemented control strategy that EPA had
fully approved.
2. Projected Future Violations: Projections of future violations can
provide the basis for continuing nonattainment designations. This
concept is particularly important because of the current economic downturn.
Information submitted to support attainment redesignations must adequately
and accurately reflect anticipated operating rates. Areas should remain
nonattainment where such projections reveal air quality violations.
3- Model ing: In most S02 cases, monitoring data alone will not be
sufficient for areas dominated by point sources. A small number of ambient;
monitors usually is not representative of the air quality for the entire
area. Dispersion modeling employing the legally enforceable SC>2 SIP limits
will generally be necessary to evaluate comprehensively the sources' impacts
as well as to identify the areas of highest concentrations. If either the
modeling or monitoring indicates that SC>2 air quality standards are being
violated, the area should remain nonattainment.
ft. Boundaries: Current policies on appropriate boundaries for designation
of nonattainment areas by EPA remain in effect, i.e., generally political
boundaries such as city or county for TSP and SOg, county as a minimum for
rural ozone, entire urbanized area and fringe areas of development for
urban ozone, and urban core area for CO. When States redesignate, EPA
will continue to accept reasonable boundaries which are supported by
appropriate data, such as specific new monitoring and/or modeling data or
evidence of improvement due to control strategy implementation. Nonattain-
ment areas for ozone should include the significant VOC sources.
5. Dispersion Techniques: Areas which are projected to attain the TSP
or SC>2 standards because of the use of unauthorized dispersion techniques
should continue to be designated as nonattainment.
212
-------
Policy for Processing 107 Redesignations
1. SIP Review Actions: Section 107 designations have generally been
classified as minor actions, with only a few of the more significant
ones being processed as moderate. In the future, redesignations of Tier II
nonattainment areas should be classified as major actions so that they
can receive a comprehensive review to help ensure regional consistency.
Redesignation of Tier I nonattainment areas should continue to be handled
as minor or moderate actions, as appropriate.
2. "Unclassifiable" Areas: Since EPA and the States have had nearly five
years to resolve discrepancies for nonattainment designations, it is now
inappropriate to redesignate any area from nonattainment to unclassi-
fiable. There has been ample time since the first designations were made
in 1978 to thoroughly study each nonattainment area. Sufficient data
should now exist to either make a redesignation to attainment or to keep
the nonattainment designation.
If you have any questions, please contact Tom Helms at (FTS) 629-5526.
cc: Regional Administrator, Regions I-X
Chief, Air Programs Branch, Regions I-X
213
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
2 3 DEC 1983
MEMORANDUM
Subject: Section 107 Questions and Answers
From: G. T. Helms, Chief x/Vr'"
Control Programs Operations Branch (MD-15)
To: Air Branch Chief
Regions I-X
The April 21, 1983 memo from Sheldon Meyers on Section 107 Redesignation
Policy has generally resulted in more consistent redesignation packages.
However, a number of questions have developed since then and it seems
worthwhile now to share with everyone the responses that have been developed.
These questions have arisen in a number of areas.
1. Is air quality data alone sufficient for a redesignation from
nonattainment to attainment?
Answer: No. Valid air quality data showing no NAAQS violations must be
supplemented with a demonstration that the approved SIP control strategy
which provides for attainment has been implemented. The April 21 memo
describes the requirements in detail. In most cases the submittal will
include the most recent eight quarters of data showing attainment and
evidence of an implemented control strategy that EPA had approved. This
demonstration need not necessarily be quantitative. Rather, it need
simply confirm that the control strategy approved in the SIP to address
the problem has indeed been implemented. Where only the most recent four
quarters of data showing attainment are available, a state-of-the-art
modeling analysis must be provided which quantifies that the SIP strategy
is sound'and that actual enforceable emission reductions are responsible
for the air quality improvements.
2. Are the same requirements discussed in answer number 1 applicable to
secondary TSP redesignations?
Answer: Yes. As for primary standards, some reason has to be shown for
the improvement in air quality. This can consist of an implemented
control strategy, some other Federally enforceable statewide regulations,
or a well-documented explanation that the circumstances which resulted in
the initial designation have changed or were incorrect. The integrity of
the designation process should be preserved, for both primary and secondary
pollutants. Further, it should be noted that States are not penalized by
remaining secondary nonattainment. Therefore, a control strategy or
other demonstration needs to be'included with thes? redesignation requests.
214
-------
3. Can a control strategy that has not been approved by EPA as part of
the SIP be used to support a redesignation?
Answer: In general, no. However, an exception will be made if the
physical circumstances and long-term economic factors are such that the
implemented measures have the same weight as a SIP: for example, the
permanent closing of the major emitting sources, road paving to eliminate
fugitive emissions, or other irreversible measures. Submittals including
such changes, even though not formally approved as SIP revisions, have
the practical impact of an EPA approved strategy and can be the basis for
approval of the redesignation.
4. Are the same criteria required to reduce the size of a nonattainment
area as are required for redesignating the entire area?
Answer: In general, yes. However, if a sound case can be made that the
State "overdesignated" initially -- that is, designated a larger area
than EPA required -- then the area can be reduced. The remaining nonattain-
ment area must be compatible with EPA boundary requirements (see April 21,
1983 memo) and it must be convincingly demonstrated that the area going
from nonattainment to attainment should not have been designated non-
attainment. Other than this specific kind of exception, however, boundary
changes require the same analysis as any nonattainment to attainment
redesignation. When a portion of a nonattainment area is redesignated
attainment, it would help the public if a statement was included in the
notice which explains that a nonattainment portion remains.
5. What criteria are used in redesignating from unclassifiable to attainment
for TSP and SO??
Answer: Redesignations from unclassifiable to attainment generally require
the most recent eight consecutive quarters of air quality data demonstrating
attainment. No control strategy demonstration is required since there
would have been no SIP requirement for an unclassifiable area. The S02
redesignations will generally continue to require dispersion modeling.
6. What is required for reclassifications from unclassifiable to attainment
for ozone, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides?
Answer: Redesignations from unclassifiable to attainment do not involve
any regulatory change. If a State wishes to make such a redesignation, it
should be sent forward as a brief explanatory Federal Register notice
documenting the information. However, the formal table containing the
designation status is not changed since the attainment and unclassifiable
designations are combined for these pollutants.
7. Is there, or has there ever been, a 50 km policy for ozone nonattainment
areas?
Answer: No, this was only discussed as an option some years ago but it
never achieved the status of Agency policy.
215
-------
These questions and answers highlight some of the significant issues
that have come up since the April 21, 1983 memo. Please call Bill Beal
or John Calcagni (FTS 629-5665) if you have further comments or questions
on Section 107 issues.
cc: B. Bauman
D. White
R. Campbell
S. Meiburg
J. Ulfelder
216
-------
CALLS FOR SIP REVISIONS
Region
III
IV
IV
V
VI
State
PA
VA
AL
FL
FL
GA
NC
TN
IL
IN
MI
MN
MN
OH
WI
LA
Area
Scranton/
Wilkes-Barre
Richmond
Jefferson Co.
Dade Co.
Broward Co.
Palm Beach Co.
Miami
Atlanta Metropolitan Area
Ra le i gh-Durham
Memphis
Madison County (Alton
and Woodriver Townships)
Porter County
Warren County
Marion Co. (Portions of
Indianapolis )
Wayne County
Portion of Dakota County
Ramsey County
City of St. Paul
Portage County
Summit County
Statewide
Ba ton Rouge
Pollutant
03
03
°3
°3
03
°3
CO
03
CO
°3
SO2
S02
S02
CO
so2
SO2
CO
03
03
so2
03
Call
Made
2/24/84
9/28/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
9/28/84
9/28/84
3/26/84
3/26/84
2/24/84
9/28/84
9/28/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
4/26/84
2/24/84
217
-------
CALLS FOR SIP REVISIONS Cont'd
Region State Area
VI OK Oklahoma City
Tulsa County
TX Dallas County
El Paso County
El Paso County
Tarrant County
Denton County
Harris County
VII MO Kansas City
KS Kansas City
KS Wichita
VIII UT Provo
IX AZ Maricopa County
IX CA Kern County
South Coast
NV Clark County
Pollutant
CO
°3
°3
°3
CO
03
°3
CO
°3
°3
CO
CO
03
03
NOX
°3
Call
Made
10/5/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
2/24/84
2/2/484
2/24/84
10/5/84
10/5/84
2/20/85
2/20/84
2/29/84
12/19/84
2/24/84
2/2/4/4
2/24/84
2/24/84
218
-------
I TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
' (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
r^CPORT NO, J2.
EPA-450/2-85/006
ft riTLE AND SUBTITLE
Maps Depicting Non-attainment Areas Pursuant to
Section 107 of the Clean Air Act - 1985
7 AUTHOR(S)
Jerry Yarn, Willis Beal, Cilton Tate
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Control Programs Development Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Control Programs Operations Branch
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
12 SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
September 1 985
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
|15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16 ABSTRACT
This report is a detailed mapping of the United States depicting those areas non-
attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen
dioxide, ozone, sulfur dioxide, and total suspended particulates . It includes non-
attainment area maps and supporting lists from Federal Register publications for
final actions through September 1, 1985.
17 KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a DESCRIPTORS b.lDENTIFI
Air Pollution
Federal Regulations
Pollution
18 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT 19 SECURI
Uncla
Release Unlimited 20 SECURI
Uncla
ERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI Held/Group
TY CLASS (This Report)' 21 NO. OF PAGES
ssif led
TY CLASS /This page) 22. PRICE
ssified
EPA Form 2270-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETF.
219
-------
|