Environmental Protection Emergency Response Number 6
Agency (5102W) September 1994
f
s>EPA Innovative Treatment Technologies
Annual Status Report
(Sixth Edition)
542R94005
-------
-------
EPA-542-R-94-005
Number 6
September 1994
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
(Sixth Edition)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Technology Innovation Office
Washington, DC 20460
-------
NOTICE
This material has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under contract number
68-CO-0047. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. To
obtain a copy of this report, fill out the request form on the next page and mail or fax it to:
U.S. EPA/NCEPI
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242
Fax Number: 513-891-6685
-------
September 1994
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES:
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Request to be on Mailing List
This report is distributed once a year to Superfund management in U.S. EPA Headquarters and regional offices, pertinent EPA laboratories,
states, EPA libraries, and representatives of other federal agencies. All project contacts listed in the report also receive a copy. If you would
like your name added to or deleted from the mailing list for future reports or would like a copy of the 6th edition, please complete the following
form and send or fax it to:
U.S. EPA/NCEPI
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242-0419
Fax number: 513-891-6685
Q Please send me a copy of the 6th Edition, £] I already have a copy of the 6th Edition, EPA-542-R-94-005.
EPA-542-R-94-005.
CU Please add my name and address to the mailing list: CD Please remove my name and address from the mailing list.
Name
Company
Street or P.O. Box
City State Zip.
My name is already on the mailing list. Please change the name and address.
FROM: TO:
111
-------
FOREWORD
In April 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
established the Technology Innovative Office (TIO) to promote the use of innovative treatment technologies for contaminated site
cleanup. TIO's mission is to encourage government and industry to increase the use of innovative treatment technology to mitigate
contaminated waste sites, soils and ground water. One of TIO's goals is the removal of regulatory and institutional barriers to the
development and use of innovative technologies. Another is the provision of richer technology and market information to target
audiences, including federal agencies, states, consulting engineering firms, responsible parties, technology developers, technology
vendors and the investment community.
This report documents the status of innovative treatment technology use in the Superfund program. To a lesser extent, the report presents
information on innovative treatment projects at non-Superfund sites under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Energy. We have expanded the report to include many new innovative projects selected by EPA in fiscal year 1993
and numerous graphics and tables to assist the reader in understanding the data. We hope that this information will allow better
communication between experienced technology users and those who are considering innovative technologies to clean up contaminated
sites, as well as enabling technology vendors to evaluate the market for innovative treatment technologies in Superfund for the next
several years.
The use of innovative treatment technologies in Superfund and other EPA waste programs is addressed by a directive, Furthering the
Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies in OSWER Programs (OSWER Directive 9380.0-17, June 10,1991). This directive sets
forth seven initiatives to remove impediments from and create incentives for the use of innovative treatment technologies for Superfund,
corrective action under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and underground storage tank cleanups. It is hoped that
efforts such as the directive and this document will increase the reliance on new, less costly, or more effective technologies to address
the problems associated with Superfund and other hazardous waste sites, and petroleum contamination.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr. Ph.D.
Director, Technology Innovation Office
IV
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This document was prepared under the direction of Ms. Linda Fiedler, work assignment manager for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's Technology Innovation Office.
Special acknowledgement is due the Regional and state staff listed as contacts for individual sites. They provided the detailed
information in this document. Their cooperation and willingness to share their knowledge and expertise on innovative treat-
ment technologies encourages the application of those technologies at other sites.
-------
ABSTRACT
This yearly report (formerly published twice a year) documents and analyzes the selection and use of innovative treatment technologies
in the U.S. EPA Superfund Program and at some non-Superfund sites under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Defense (DoD) and
Energy (DOE). The status of most projects have been updated, and projects selected in fiscal year 1993 Superfund Records of Decision
(ROD) are included. The information will allow better communication between experienced technology users and those who are
considering innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites. In addition, the information will enable technology vendors to
evaluate the market for innovative technologies in Superfund for the next several years. It also will be used by EPA's Technology
Innovation Office to track progress in the application of innovative treatment technologies.
Alternative treatment technologies are alternatives to land disposal. Innovative treatment technologies are alternative treatment
technologies the use of which at Superfund and similar sites is inhibited by lack of data on cost and performance. This report documents
the use of the following innovative treatment technologies to treat ground water (in situ), soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix
wastes:
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Chemical treatment
Dechlorination
In situ flushing
In situ vitrification Other technologies (air sparging,
Soil vapor extraction contained recovery of oil wastes,
Soil washing limestone barriers and fuming
Solvent extraction gasification)
Thermal desorption
The document includes information on 290 applications of innovative treatment technologies for remedial actions, 31 applications for
removal actions, and 28 applications under other federal programs. Sections 1,2, and 3 contain summary information for Superfund
remedial, removal and other Federal program sites, at which innovative treatment has been selected or used. Appendices A, B, and
C contain site-specific information for Superfund remedial, removal and other federal program sites respectively. The information for
these sections was collected through analyses of RODs, review of OSWER tracking systems, and interviews with EPA regional, DoD,
and DOE staff. Appendix E also contains performance and operating data on the 25 remedial, 20 removal, and 7 non-Superfund
innovative projects that have been completed.
VI
-------
Document Request Form
CONTENTS
Page
ii
iii
Notice u
IV
Foreword
Acknowledgements v.
Abstract X!
List of Figures vm
List of Tables 1X
List of Abbreviations x
OVERVIEW
Introduction "
What are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies? U V -1
Sources of Information for this Report c\\f~\
Definitions for Specific Innovative Treatment Technologies OV-2
SECTION 1: INNOVATIVE SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS j
Frequency of Technology Selection *
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation ^
Contaminants of Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies o
Quantity of Soil Addressed ^
Treatment Trains
SECTION 2: INNOVATIVE SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS 8
Frequency of Technology Selection °
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation , ^
Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies 10
Treatment Trains
SECTIONS: INNOVATIVE ACTIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS U
i ^
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Vll
-------
Apendices Page
Appendix A: Innovative Technologies at Superfund Remedial Actions
Table A-1: Superfund Remedial Actions: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology A-1
Table A-2: Superfund Remedial Actions: Established Treatment Technologies by Fiscal Year A-68
Appendix B: Innovative Technologies at Superfund Removal Actions
Table B-l: Superfund Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology B-l
Appendix C: Innovative Technologies at Actions Under Other Federal Programs
Table C-l: Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology C-l
Appendix D: Summary of Status Report Updates, Changes, and Deletions D-l
Appendix E: Completed Innovative Projects and Treatment Trains E-1
Table E-1: Superfund Remedial Actions: Performance Data on Completed Projects E-1
Table E-2: Superfund Removal Actions: Performance Data on Completed Projects E-11
Table E-3: Other Federal Programs: Performance Data on Completed Projects E-19
Table E-4: Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies E-22
Table E-5: Superfund Removal Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies E-25
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Page
1 Superfund Remedial Actions: RODs Signed by Fiscal Year 1
2 Superfund Remedial Actions: Source Control RODs by Fiscal Year 1
3 Superfund Remedial Actions: Overview of Source Control RODs Through Fiscal Year 1993 2
4 Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment and Disposal Decisions for Source Control 2
5 Superfund Remedial Actions: Summary of Alternative Treatment Technologies Selected
Through Fiscal Year 1993 3
6 Superfund Remedial Actions: Number of Established Versus Innovative Treatment Technologies 4
7 Superfund Remedial Actions: Number of Innovative Treatment Technologies Versus 4
Corresponding RODs
8 Superfund Remedial Actions: Innovative Treatment Technologies by Year 5
9 Superfund Remedial Actions: Trends in the Selection of Four Innovative Treatment Technologies 5
10 Superfund Remedial Actions: Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of June 1994 6
11 Superfund Remedial Actions: Application of Innovative Treatment Technologies 6
12 Superfund Remedial Actions: Quantities of Soil to be Treated by Innovative Technologies 12
Vlll
-------
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
13 Superfund Removal Actions: Summary of Innovative Technologies Selected/Used as of June 1994 8
14 Superfund Removal Actions: Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of June 1994 9
15 Superfund Removal Actions: Application of Innovative Treatment Technologies 10
16 Sample of Projects Under Other Federal Programs: Summary of Treatment Technologies as of June 1994 11
17 Sample of Projects Under Other Federal Programs: Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies 12
as of June 1994
E-l Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies E-23
IX
-------
LIST OF ABREVIATIONS
AM Action Memorandum
APC Air pollution control
APEG Alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
ARCS Alternative remedial contracts strategy
ATTIC Alternative Treatment Technology Information
Center
BCD Base catalyzed dechlorination
BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene
BTX Benzene, toluene, and xylene
cy Cubic yards
DCA Dichloroethane
DCE Dichloroethylene
DEHP Di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate)
DLA Defense Logistics Agency
DNT Dinitrotoluene
EEC A Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
ESD Explanation of significant differences
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
ft Feet
FUDS Formerly used defense sites
FY Fiscal year
gw Ground water
IRP Installation Restoration Program
KPEG Potassium hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
MEK Methyl ethyl ketone
MBOCA 4,4' -Methylenebis(2-chloroaniline)
NAPL Nonaqueous phase liquids
NFEC Navy Facilities Engineering Command
NPL
OERR
OSC
OSWER
OU
PAH
PCB
PCE
PCP
PRP
RA
RCRA
RD
ROD
RPM
RSKERL
SARA
SACM
SVOC
s/s
TCA
TCE
TIO
USACE
USDA
VOC
National Priorities List
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
On-scene coordinator
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Operable unit
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon
Polychlorinated biphenyl
Perchloroethylene(tetrachloroethylene)
Pentachlorophenol
Potentially responsible party
Remedial action
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Remedial design
Record of Decision
Remedial project manager
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,
Ada, Oklahoma (EPA)
Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act
of 1986
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
Semivolatile organic compound
Solidification and stabilization
Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Technology Innovation Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Volatile organic compound
-------
OVERVIEW
Introduction
The Technology Innovation Office (TIO) of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) has prepared this Innovative Treatment
Technologies: Annual Status Report todocumenttheuseof innovative
treatment technologies to remediate both Superfund and non-
Superfund sites. The report contains site-specific information on
Superfund sites (both remedial and removal actions) and non-
Superfund sites (sites addressed under other federal programs) at
which innovative treatment technologies are being used. Site managers
can use this report in evaluating cleanup alternatives. Innovative
technology vendors can use it in identifying potential markets. TIO
also uses the information to track progress in the application of
innovative treatment technologies.
The report is updated annually. This September 1994 issue of the
report updates and expands information provided in the September
1993 report. Information added to this update includes 60 innovative
treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in fiscal year
(FY) 1993 Superfund records of decision (ROD)a ROD is the
decision document used to specify the way a site, or part of a site, will
be remediatedand information on 11 additional completed projects.
What Are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies?
Alternative treatment technologies are alternatives to land disposal.
The most frequently used alternative technologies are incineration
and solidification/stabilization. Innovative treatment technologies
are alternative treatment technologies for which applications at
Superfund and similar sites are inhibited by lack of data on performance
and cost. In general, a treatment technology is considered innovative
if it has had limited full-scale application. Often, it is the application
of a technology or process to soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-
matrix waste (such as mining slag) that is innovative. Groundwater
treatment after the water has been pumped to the surface often
resembles traditional water treatment technologies; thus, in general,
pump-and-treat or ex situ groundwater remedies are considered
established. In situ bioremediation and other in situ treatment of
groundwater, however, are considered innovative technologies.
This report documents the use of the following innovative treatment
technologies to treat soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix waste:
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Chemical treatment
Dechlorination
In situ flushing
In situ vitrification
Soil vapor extraction
Soil washing
Solvent extraction
Thermal desorption
Other technologies
(e.g., air sparging,
contained recovery of
oily wastes, limestone
barriers, and fuming
gasification)
In addition, the remedial sites that are using in-situ bioremediation
for groundwater remediation are included with the in situ
bioremediation projects.
Sources of Information for This Report
EPA initially used RODs from individual sites to compile information
on remedial actions and pollution reports, on-scene coordinators'
reports, and the OSWER Removal Tracking System to compile data
on emergency response actions. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste (HTRW) Mandatory Center
of Expertise (Omaha, Nebraska) and the Synopses of Federal
OV-i
-------
Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies, Third
Edition (EPA/542/B-93/009) were consulted to compile information
on projects under other federal programs. EPA then verified and
updated the draft information through interviews with remedial
project managers (RPM) and on-scene coordinators (OSC) and other
contacts for each site. The data concerning project status do not
duplicate data in CERCLIS, EPA's Superfund tracking system. This
report provides more detailed information specifically on the portion
of the remedy pertaining to an innovative technology. In addition,
information about technologies and sites identified here might differ
from information found in the ROD annual reports and the RODs
database. These differences are the result of design changes in the
treatment trains used at sites that may or may not require official
documentation (that is, a ROD amendment or an explanation of
significant differences (ESD)).
Definitions of Specific Innovative Treatment Technologies
The innovative treatment technologies reported in the following
chapters treat hazardous wastes in very different ways. The following
paragraphs define the technologies as they are represented in this
document and provide summary statistics on some of the technologies.
EX SITU BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade
organic contaminants on excavated soil, sludge, and solids. The
microorganisms break down the contaminants by using them as a
food source. The end products are typically CO2 and Hf>. Ex situ
bioremediation includes slurry-phase bioremediation, in which the
soils are mixed in water to form a slurry, and solid phase
bioremediation, in which the soils are placed in a tank or building and
tilled with water, and nutrients. Variations of the latter process are
called land fanning or composting.
In applications of IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION, nutrients and an
oxygen source are pumped under pressure into the soil or aquifer
through wells, or they are spread on the surface for infiltration to the
contaminated material.
In CHEMICAL TREATMENT the contaminants are converted to
less hazardous compounds through chemical reactions. The
technology is most often used to reduce a contaminant (hexavalent
chromium to the trivalent form) or oxidize a contaminant (cyanide,
for example). Neutralization is considered an available technology
and is not included in this report.
DECHLORINATION (another type of chemical treatment) results
in the removal orreplacement of chlorine atoms bonded to hazardous
compounds.
For IN SITU FLUSHING, large volumes of water, at times
supplemented with treatment compounds, are introduced to soil,
waste, or groundwater to flush hazardous contaminants from a site.
This technology is predicated on the assumption that the injected
water can be isolated effectively within the aquifer and recovered.
IN SITU VITRIFICATION treats contaminated soil in place at
temperatures of approximately 3000°F (1600°C). Metals are
encapsulated in the glass-like structure of the melted silicate
compounds. Organics may be treated by combustion.
SOIL WASHING is used for two purposes. First, the mechanical
action and water (sometimes with additives) physically remove the
contaminants from the soil particles. Second, agitation of the soil
particles allows the smaller diameter, more highly contaminated
fines to separate from the larger soil particles, thus reducing the
volume of material requiring further treatment.
SOLVENT EXTRACTION operates on the principle that organic
contaminants can be solubilized preferentially and removed from the
OV-2
-------
waste in the correct solvent. The solvent used will vary, depending
on the waste to be treated
For THERMAL DESORPTION, the waste is heated in a controlled
environment to cause organic compounds to volatilize from the
waste. The operating temperature for thermal desorption is usually
less than 1000'F (550*C). The volatilized contaminants usually
require further control or treatment.
SOILVAPOREXTRACnONremovesvolatileorganicconstituents
from the soil in place through the use of vapor extraction wells,
sometimes combined with air injection wells, to strip and flush the
contaminants into the air stream for further treatment.
OTHER TECHNOLOGIES include air sparging and the contained
recovery of oily wastes (CROW), limestone barriers, and fuming
gasification technologies. Air sparging involves injecting air into the
aquifer to strip or flush volatile contaminants as the air percolates up
through the groundwater and is captured by a vapor extraction
system. The CROW process displaces oil wastes with steam and hot
water. The contaminated oils and groundwater are swept into a more
permeable area and are pumped out of the aquifer. Limestone
barriers act like chemical slurry walls. Contaminated groundwater
comes into contact with the barrier and pH increases. The increase in
pH effectively immobilizes dissolved metals and neutralizes the soil.
Fuming gasification is a thermal treatment process that purges
contaminants from solids and soils as metal fumes and organic
vapors. The organic vapors can be burned as fuel and the metal fumes
can be recovered and recycled.
The following sections contain summary information and analysis
on sites at which innovative treatment technologies are being or have
been applied. Section 1 covers all Superfund sites implementing an
innovative treatment technology under a remedial action. These
actions are usually documented in a ROD. Section 2 provides
information on Superfund removal action sites. Removals are
conducted in response to an immediate threat caused by a release of
hazardous substances.* Section 3 covers non-Superfund sites or
sites being addressed under other federal programs.
* Historically, remedial and removal actions operate under different procedural guidelines. The EPA currently is revising the Superfund process under the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM). Under SACM, EPA will adopt a continuous process for assessing site specific conditions and the need for action. Risks will be
reduced quickly through early remedial or removal action.
OV-3
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
SECTION 1: SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS
Frequency of Technology Selection
ROD Statistics As of April, 1994, there are 1,287 sites on the National
Priorities List (NPL), excluding 58 sites deleted from the NPL. 1,207
RODs (including ROD Amendments) had been signed. Most RODs
for remedial actions address the source of contamination, such as soil,
sludge, sediments, solid-type wastes, and nonaqueous phase liquids
(NAPL). These RODs are referred to as "source control" RODs.
Other RODs address ground water only or specify that no action is
necessary. Figure 1 shows the number of source control RODs
compared with the total number of RODs for each fiscal year.
FIGURE 1
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: RODS SIGNED
BY FISCAL YEAR
(Total Number of RODs -1,117)
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
Fiscal YMV
The difference between the total number of RODs and the number of source control
RODs is the number of "groundwater remedy only* or "no action needed" RODs.
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
An analysis of source control RODs allows a comparison of the frequency
of selection of treatment with that of selection of containment or disposal
to remedy contamination at sites. Source control RODs are classified by
the general type of technology selected: (1) RODs specifying some
alternative treatment, (2) RODs specifying containment or disposal only,
and (3) RODs specifying other action (such as land use restrictions,
monitoring, or relocation). Rgure 1 shows the number of source control
RODs that fall under each category. RODs in which some treatment is
selected may include containment of treatmentresiduals or of waste from
another part of the site.
FIGURE 2
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SOURCE
CONTROL RODS BY FISCAL YEAR
Number 100-
of
RODs *>-
Ottw (In««u6onal Controls,
Monitoring. fMocafen)
82 S3 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
92 93
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
-------
Overall, 64 percent of source control RODs have selected at least one
treatment technology for source control (Figure 3). The Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) required that
EPA favor permanent remedies (that is, alternative treatment) over
containment or disposal to remediate Superfund sites. In each of the
past six years at least 70 percent of source control RODs contained
provisions for the treatment of wastes. The increase is most dramatic
FIGURES
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: OVERVIEW OF
SOURCE CONTROL RODS THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1993
Other'(19) 2%
Containment at Disposal Only
(307)34%
Some Treatment
(588)64%
* Includes institutional controls, monitoring, and relocation.
() Number of RODs
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
in FY1988. Fifty percent of RODs in FY 1987 selected some
treatment for source control, whereas 69 percent of RODs in FY 1988
selected some treatment (Figure 4). The percentage was 72 percent in
FY 1993. Figure 4 also illustrates the percentage of RODs selecting
at least one innovative technology, as updated by current project status
information. Out of a total of 914 source control RODs signed
through FY 1993, innovative technologies were selected and are still
being considered or used for approximately 29 percent of source
control RODs. Overall, 22 percent of all RODs have included
innovative technologies.
FIGURE 4
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT
AND DISPOSAL DECISIONS FOR SOURCE CONTROL
100-
80
Percent of
Source
Control
KQCOToS Of
Decision 40
V
I I I I \ I
o- Containment or Dhposal Only
* Some Treatment
* Some Innovative Treatment
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
Note: Data for innovative technologies are derived from Records of Decision
(ROOs) for fiscal years 1982 -1993 and anticipated design and construction
activities as otJuno 1994. More than one technology per site maybe used.
Technology Statistics Another way of illustrating the greater use of
treatment is by quantifying the number and kinds of treatment
technologies selected and used. Most of the remainder of the
information contained in this chapter focuses on technologies, rather
than RODs. In each ROD in which treatment was specified, several
alternative treatment technologies may have been selected.
Through FY 1993,642 treatment technologies have been selected in
588 source control RODs specifying some treatment In addition,
EPA has selected in situ treatment of ground water for 24 remedial
sites for a total 666 treatment technologies. EPA selected in situ
-------
treatment of groundwater for three remedial sites in FY 1993. The
selection of multiple technologies results from the use of treatment
trains or from the treatment of different wastes or areas of the site. For
the 588 RODs specifying treatment for source control, Figure 5 lists each
type of treatment technology selected and how often it has been selected
or used for source control. Figure 5 illustrates that, through FY 1993,44
percent of the 666 treatment technologies selected were innovative and
56 percent were established. Table A-l, appearing in Appendix A,
contains summary information on the innovative treatment technology
projectsatremedial sites. TabfeA-21istssitesusingestablished technologies.
Information on the established treatment technologies is based on a
review by the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR)
rather than interviews of Regional or State staff.
FIGURE 5
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1993
(Total Number of Technologies - 666;
Innovative Technologies # (290) 44%
Established Technologies (376) 56%
Off-Site Incineration
(102) 15%
On-Site Incineration
(73)11%'
Solidification/Stabilization
(190)29%
Other Established (11) 2%
Soil Washing (15) 2%
Solvent Extraction (4) < 1%
Ex Situ Bioremediation (38) 6%
In Situ Bioremediation (30) 5%
In Situ Flushing (18) 3%
_ Soil Vapor Extraction
(121) 18%
Dechlorination (5) < 1%
In Situ Vitrification (2) < 1%
Chemical Treatment (1) < 1%
\ Thermal Desorption (41) 6%
Other Innovative (15) 2%
Note: Data are derived from 1982- 1993 Records of Decision (RODs) for fiscal years and anticipated design and construction activities as of July 1994. More than one technology per site
may be used.
() Number of times this technology was selected or used.
' "Other" established technologies are soil aeration, in situ flaming, and chemical neutralization. "Other" innovative technologies are air sparging, contained recovery of oily wastes,
limestone barriers, and fuming gasification.
# Includes 24 in situ groundwater treatment remedies.
-------
Figure 6 compares the numbers of established and innovative
technologies by fiscal year. The figure indicates that more innovative
technologies than established technologies have been selected in
RODs in fiscal years 1991 and 1993. Figure 7 compares the number
of innovative technologies selected with the number of sites. This
graph illustrates that some sites are using more than one innovative
technology, often together in "treatment trains." The figure also
indicates that the ratio of innovative technologies to sites has increased
every year since FY 1986. Figure 8 gives the frequency of selection
for each innovative technology by fiscal year. Figure 9 shows the
frequency of selection for the four most frequently selected innovative
treatment technologies, including soil vapor extraction by fiscal
year.
FIGURE 6
SUPERFVND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: NUMBER OF
ESTABLISHED VERSUS INNOVATIVE TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES
50-
Numberof ^Q.
Treatment
Technologies ;
»_
10-
v1
S>- Established TechnotogiM
O- lnnov*lv* Twhmtogira
ISf
X
K,
rt_
"X
X
s
°
51
y
i\ t
ztj
/
/
7
/
^
42
»~
/
.rf
V*
."/
/vS
/jj\
V
50^
51
-a
V
°T -
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
Fiscal Year
Note: Data for innovative technologies are derived from Records of Decision
(RODs) for fiscal years 1982- 1993 and anticipated design and construction
activities as ofJune 1994. More than one technology per site may be used.
FIGURE?
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: NUMBER OF
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
VERSUS CORRESPONDING RODS
70
60
50
Number of
Treatment
Technologies
or
RODS 30
20
10
0
Total Tfchnologt** * 2fO
Total ROD** 231
Note: Data derived from 1982 - 1 993 Records of Decision (ROD) and anticipated design and
construction activities as of June 1994. Numberof RODs in a fiscal year usually equals
the number of sites.
-------
SUPERFUNDREME
NOTE: Data derived from Fa
FIGURES
DIAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY YEAR
FtecdYMr
TartMinlnmr
fVGOTBKiyjr
Sol Vfcpor Extraction
8fM*mdtaakm(ExSlt4
Thonnil DMOfptton
a&wmdtabftt&tSttu}
SolWathlng
*$tefe*ttig--
OttMT
0*qhtartn*ton
Sowwit Extraction
uteflrilGri TPMtoMnt
Vfcrificfltion
TOTAL
1984
0
i.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
IMS
2
..<).
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
'«
1M8
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
D
0
a
0
$
1M7
1
0
3
3,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
1888
8
4
4
2
4
Z
0
D
0
0
0
24
1(69
19
8
2
3
2
»
1
0
3
0
1
41
1WO
18
4
7
3
6
1
0
1
0
4
0
40
1991
32
4
10
4
1
4
4
2
1
0
1
«1
1992
20
»
4
*
2
4
4
9
0
1
0
SO
1993
19
...7
9
»
0
2
6
1
0
0
0
S3
TOTAL
121
38
41
30
15
m
15
*
4
t
2
290
cat Year 1982- 1993 Records of Decisnn (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994
FIGURE 9
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TRENDS IN THE SELECTION OF FOUR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
35-
25-
Numbef of 20-
Tlnws
15
- Sou Vapor Extraction
1 Thennml Deioiption
SoilWuhmg
/\
92 93
* Also includes in situ groundwater treatment
NOTE: Data derived from Fiscal Year 1982- 1993 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994
-------
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Many of the innovative technologies documented in this report have
been selected in the last several years. The design of such projects
typically takes one to three years; therefore, relatively few innovative
technologies have been contracted for and installed, and even fewer
have been completed (Figure 10). In the next several years, though,
many projects now in design should become operational. The
summary matrix presents remedial action sites using innovative
treatment technologies by status and specific technology. Table E-l
in Appendix £ presents detailed information on remedial projects that
have been completed.
FIGURE 10
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT
STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1994
Dmrfaoinn/ Design Complete/
Technoiogy "J^g* 8-ngln.W.d,
3 Operational
Soil Vapor Extraction 69 42
Thermal Desorption 26 7
ExSituBroremediation 24 12
In Situ BJoremediation 14 14
Soil Washing 11 3
In Situ Rushing 14 3
DecNorination 3 1
Solvent Extraction 3 1
In Situ Vitrification 1 1
Chemical Treatment 1 0
Other Innovative Treatment 12 3
Total 178 (61%) 87 (30%)
Project
Completed
10
8
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
25(9%)
Total
121
41
38
30
15
18
5
4
2
1
15
290
Note: Data am derived from 1982 - 1993 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated
design and construction activities as of June 1994.
Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies
The data collected for this report form the basis for an analysis of the
classes of contaminants treated by each technology type at remedial
action sites. Figure 1-11 provides this information, by technology, for
three major contaminant groups: volatile organic compounds (VOC),
semivolatile organic compounds (S VOC), and metals. For thisreport,
compounds are categorized as VOCs or S VOCs, according to the lists
provided in EPA'sSW-846TestMethods 8240 and 8270, respectively.
FIGURE 11
SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: APPLICATION
OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Number
of
Application* «
SoHVipor
Extraction
Thwiral Bio-
DMorption mmdMion
Solvent
Extraction
Soil
Wishing
Innovative Technology
Quantity of Soil Addressed
EPA analyzed the quantity of soil treated at 209 sites using innovative
treatment technologies, and for which quantity data were available
(Figure 12). This analysis provides an indication of the scale of the
projects involved.
-------
Treatment Trains
Innovative treatment technologies in this report may be used with
estobUshedorother innovative treatmenttechnologies in treatment trains.
Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material
requiringmrthertreatmen^topreventlte
during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a
single medium. Appendix E presents the data on treatment trains
contained within this report Tables E-4 and E-5 lists the sites at which
treatment trains are being used.
SUPE1
FIGURE 12
VFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: QUANTITIES OF SOIL TO BE TREATED BY INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
- I-- '}
Technology
In Situ Flushing
Soil vapor extraction
Bioremediation (in situ)
Soil washing
Sovent extraction
Bioremediation (ex situ)
Thermal desorption
Dechlorination
Vitrification
Chemical treatment
Other
TOTAL
Number of Sites With Data
(Total Number Of Sites)
11 (18)
86(121)
12(30)
15(15)
4(4)
32(38)
38(41)
3(5)
2(2)
1(1)
5(15)
209(290)
Quantity (Cubic Yards)
Range Average Total
5,200-650,000 90,000 990,100
60 - 2,000,000 85,000 7,346.745
5,000 - 250,000 54.000 653,450
1 ,800 - 200,000 35,1 00 526,500
9,000-85,000 42,000 167,500
1 .000 - 208,000 42,000 1 ,304,1 95
1 ,800 - 1 30,000 21 ,000 808,200
700 - 48,000 22,000 66,500
1.500-5.000 3,250 6,500
3,000 3,000 3,000
1,000-45,000 200 87,259
11,960,049
-------
SECTION 2: SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS
Superfund removal actions are conducted in response to an immediate
threat caused by a release of hazardous substances. Removal action
decisionsaredocumentedinanactionmemorandum. Todate, innovative
treatment technologies have been used in relatively few removal actions.
The innovative technologies addressed in this report have been used 31
timesin26removal actions (Figure 13). In addition.infrared incineration,
no longer considered innovative, was first used at two removal actions.
Many removals involve small quantities of waste or immediate threats
requiring quick action to alleviate the hazard. Often, such activities do
not lend themselves to on-site treatment approaches. In addition, SARA
does not prescribe the same preference for innovative treatment for
removals that it does for remedial actions.
EPA would like to increase the use of innovative treatment methods to
address removal problems. One of the seven initiatives set forth in the
EPA directive described in the foreword concerns removal actions. It is
expected that innovative treatment technologies will be used more often
in the future, for larger, and less time-critical removal actions.
Table B-1 in Appendix B provides detailed information for each applica-
tion of an innovative technology at a removal site. The summary matrix
presents summaries by EPA Region and status for all applications of
innovative technologies at removal sites.
Frequency of Technology Selection
Figure 13 listseachtypeofinnovativetreatmenttechnologyandindicates
how often that technology has been selected as a remedy for removal
actions. Figure 13 illustrates that chemical treatment was selected most
often and represented 23 percent of all applications of innovative treat-
ment technologies at removal sites. Bioremediation (ex situ) was chosen
six times and represented 19 percent of all applications of innovative
treatment technologies at removal sites.
FIGURE 13
SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS:
SUMMARY OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES SELECTED/USED AS OF JUNE 1994
(Total = 31)
Dechlorination (Liquids) (2) 6%
In Situ Vitrification (1)3%,
Solvent Extraction (2) 6%
Thermal Desorption (2) 6% -,
Chemical Treatment (7) 23%
Other (1) 3%
Note: Data from a survey of EPA Regional Removal Branch chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators.
' Includes one in situ groundwater treatment
.r-Soil Vapor Extraction (4) 13%
Soil Washing (2) 6%
Ex Situ Bioremediation (6) 19%
In Situ Bioremediation (4) 13%
f ) Number of times this technology was selected or used.
-------
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Figure 14 indicates the status of innovative treatment technologies
that are being applied at removal action sites. Since removals are
responses to an immediate threat and often involve smaller quantities
of hazardous wastes than remedials, the implementation of the tech-
nology may progress faster at a removal site than at a remedial site.
The figure indicates that a large percentage, 58 percent, of removal
projects involving innovative treatment technologies have been com-
pleted. The Summary Matrix provides information on removal action
sites using innovative treatment technologies by status and specific
technology. Table E-2 in Appendix E provides detailed information
on removal projects that have been completed.
p
FIGURE 14
SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS:
ROJECT STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1994*
Technology
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Ex Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Bioremediation #
Soil Washing
In Situ Flushing
Dechlorination
Solvent Extraction
In Situ Vitrification
Other Innovative Treatment
Chemical Treatment
TOTAL
Predesign/
In Design
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 (3%)
Design Complete/ Being
Installed/Operational
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
9 (29%)
Project
Completed
3
1
3
3
1
0
2
2
0
0
6
21 (68%)
Total
4
2
6
4
2
0
2
2
1
1
7
31
* Data derived from a survey of EPA Superfund Removal Branch Chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators for each Region.
# Includes one in situ groundwater treatment
-------
Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies Treatment Trains
Figure 15 provides information, by technology, for three major
contaminant groups treated at removal action sites: volatile organic
compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC), and
metals. For this report, compounds are categorized as VOCs or
SVOCs, using the lists provided in EPA's SW-846 Test Methods
8240 and 8270, respectively.
Innovative treatment technologies in this report may be used together
with established or other innovative treatment technologies in treat-
ment trains. Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of
material requiring further treatment, to prevent the emission of
volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address
multiple contaminants in a single medium. Table E-5 in Appendix E
lists the sites at which such treatment trains are being used.
FIGURE 15
SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS: APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
VOCs
SVOCs
CO Metals
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Thermal
Desorption
Bio-
remediation
Solvent
Extraction
Soil
Washing
Chemical
Treatment
Innovative Technology
10
-------
SECTION 3: ACTIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL
PROGRAMS
This chapter contains available information on projects conducted
under other federal programs that are not part of the Superfund
program (non-Superfund sites). Many of these projects take place at
DoD and DOE facilities. Many of the DoD projects are funded by the
Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP), which in-
cludes the installation restoration program (IRP) and the formerly
used defense sites (FUDS) program in DoD. These sites were
identified through various sources of information, including discus-
sions with DoD and DOE personnel. However, this list of sites should
not be considered comprehensive.
This chapter contains information on the application of innovative
technologies at 28 non-Superfund sites. Figure 16 lists each type of
innovative treatment technology and the number of times it has been
selected as a remedy at a non-Superfund site. Figure 17 indicates the
status of innovative technologies being applied at non-Superfund
sites. The Summary Matrix provides information on each application
by status and EPA Region. Table C-1 in Appendix C provides detailed
information on each application. Table E-3 in Appendix E lists details
on completed applications.
FIGURE 16
SAMPLE OF PROJECTS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS:
SUMMARY OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF JUNE 1994*
(Total Number of Technologies = 28)
Other Innovative (1) 4%
r*chlorinatton(l)4% \ /oil Washing (2) 7%
^- Ex Situ Bioremediation (5) 18%
Soil Vapor Extraction (11) 39%
In Situ Bioremediation (8) 28%
Note: Data are derived from a survey of U. S. Army Corps of Engineers sites and projects listed in the Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies, Second Edition
EPA/542/B-9&003. More than one technology per site may be used.
() Number ol times this technology was selected or used.
Other irmova tive technologies are air sparging and contained recovery of oty wastes.
* Inclusion in situ groundwater treatment remedies.
11
-------
FIGURE 17
SAMPLE OF PROJECTS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS:
STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1994*
Twhnoionv Predesign/ Design Complete/ Being
iccnnoiogy |n Desjgn installed/Operational
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Ex Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Bioremediation*
Soil Washing
In Situ Flushing
Dechlorination
Solvent Extraction
In Situ Vitrification
Other Innovative Treatment
Chemical Treatment
TOTAL
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5(18%)
5
0
2
6
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
16 (57%)
Project
Completed
1
0
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7(25%)
Total
11
0
5
8
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
28
Data derived from a survey of EPA Superfund Removal Branch Chiefs and Cm-Scene Coordinators tor each Region.
Also includes in situ gnoundwarer treatment.
12
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Region 1
Technology Type
Region
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Site Name, State
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
Linemaster Switch Corporation, CT
Silresim, MA
Iron Horse Park, MA
Re-Solve, MA
Norwood PCBs, MA
Cannon Engineering/Bridgewater, MA
Groveland Wells, MA
Wells G&HOU1, MA
Hocomonco Pond, BSD, MA
Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME
O'Connor, ME
McKin,ME
Mottolo Pig Farm, NH
South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH
Tinkham Garage (OU 1), NH
Ottati & Goss, NH
Tibbetts Road, NH
Stamina Mills, RI
PicUlo Farm Site, RI
Peterson/Puritan Inc. (OU 1), RI
Status
D
PD
I
O
O
D
C
O
O
I
D
D
C
O
I
D
C
PD
PD
PD
PD
Action
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
w *
Y <*
r
r
/ ^
?/ N
y
/A
I
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
i
E
E
I
ai
1
i
1
E
i
eb
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; d = Fuming gasification e = insitu oxidation
13
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Region 2
Technology Type
Region
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
' iimmwnrmmimmri
Site Name, State
A O Polymer, Soil treatment phase, NJ
Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2, NJ
FAA Technical Center, NJ
Myers Property, NJ
Lipari Landfill (OU 2), NJ
Vinetand Chemical, OU 1 andOU2,NJ
King of Prussia, NJ
Metattec/Aerosystems, OU 1 - Soil Treatment, NJ
Reich Farms, NJ
Waldkfc Aerospace Devices (OU 1), NJ
South Jersey Clothing, NJ
Garden State Cleaners, NJ
Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment, NJ
Industrial Latex, OU 1, NJ
Vineland Chemical, NJ
Zschiegner Refining Company, NJ
Universal Oil Products, NJ
Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 23, NJ
Circuitron Corporation, OU 1, NY
Mattiace Petrochemicals Company, OU I, NY
Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY
Status
D
D
I
D
O
D
C
0
D
C
D
O
I
PD
C
C
D
D
D
PD
D/I
Ac«fcn_^X4
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
*Y
y<
0
Y*
1
a|
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other=Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
14
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Status: PD = Piedesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
15
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Region
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Site Name, State
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
Cryochem, OU 3, PA
Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3, PA
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE Area, OU1, PA
BendU, PA
Lord-Shope Landfill, PA
Tyson's Dump, PA
Brodhead Creek, OU 1, PA
Tonolli Corporation, PA
Raymark,PA
Brown's Battery Breaking Site, OU 2, PA
Saegertown Industrial Area Site, PA
William Dick Lagoons, OU 3, PA
Arrowhead Associates/Scovill, OU 1, VA
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1, VA
Avtex Fibers, VA
Defense General Supply Center, OU 5, VA
Langley AFB, IRP Site 28, VA
Rentokil, VA
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas, WV
Status
PD
D
D
O
PD
D/I
O
I
PD
O
PD
D
PD
PD
D
C
C
I
D
D
Action
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Other
Remedial
Remedial
/
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Technology Type
Region 4
Region
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Site Name, State
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 2, AL
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant) OU 4, AL
Brown Wood Preserving, FL
Dubose Oil Products, FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits (amended ROD), FL
Hollingsworth Solderless, FL
Peak Oil/Bay Drums OU 1, FL
Robins AFB, Landfill / Sludge Lagoon, OU 1, GA
General Refining, GA
Basket Creek Surface Impoundment, GA
Mathis Brothers - S. Marble Top Road Landfill, GA
Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1, KY
Southeastern Wood Preserving, MS
Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon #7, OU 1, NC
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, (OU 1 ft OU 4), NC
JADCO-Hugbes, NC
Carolina Transformer, NC
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
BenfieW Industries, NC
Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits, NC
JFD Electronics/Channel Master, NC
Status
PD
PD
C
O
D
D
C
PD
PD
C
C
D
O
C
D
PD
D
D
D/I
D
D
D
Action prv
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Y*
^c
r
7"
y^
r
/
y<*
r/«
Y\
\
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; DA = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
17
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Region 4
Technology Type
Region
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Site Name, Stale
PCX-Washington Site, NC
USMC Camp Lejeune Military Base, OU 2, NC
Hinson Chemical SC
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
Medley Farm, OU1.SC
Wamchem, SC
Sangamo/Twelve-Mile/Hartwcll PCB, OU 1, SC
Savannah River DOE, M Area Settling Basin, SC
CSX McConnick Derailment Site, SC
Rochester Property, SC
Helena Chemical, SC
Para-Cbem Southern, Inc., SC
Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., OU 1, TN
Carrier Air Conditioning, TN
Status
I
D
C
D
D/I
C
D
O
C
PD
D
PD
D
D/I
^^rw*y*y */*/*/
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Technology Type
Region 5
Site Name, State
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor, OU 3, IL
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. OU 3 & OU 6, IL
Enviro. Cons, and Chem. (ROD Amend), IN
Main Street Well Field, IN
Seymour Recycling, IN
Fisher Calo Chem, IN
Wayne Waste Reclamation, IN
Seymour Recycling (Ground water), IN
American Chemical Services, IN
Indiana Wood Treating, IN
Reilly Tar and Chemical, IN
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
Carter Industries, MI
Sturgis Municipal Well Field, MI
Chem Central, MI
ThermoChem, Inc. OU 1, MI
Verona Well Field, OU 2, MI
Anderson Development (ROD Amendment), MI
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
19
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Technology Type
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C - Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d= Fuming gasification
20
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Region 5
Technology Type
Region
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State
Pristine (ROD Ammendment), OH
Pristine (ROD Ammendment), OH
Miami County Incinerator, OH
Skinner Landfill, (002), OH
Muskago Sanitary Landfill, WI
Wausau Groundwater Contamination
Moss American, WI
Moss American, WI
Hagen Farm Site, Ground water, WI
Hagen Farm Source Control OU, WI
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI
City Disposal Corporation Landfill, WI
Status
I
C
D
PD
D/I
0
PD
PD
D
0
O
PD
Action
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
W&/&/W4Y+Y */&/&/
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
MacMillan Ring Free Oil Company. AR
Popite,AR
Old Inger CHI Refinery, LA
Pab OU & Chemical Services, LA
American Creosote Works, Inc. (Winnfield), LA
Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, MM
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, MM
Holloinan AFB, Main POL Area, NM
Holloman AFB, BX Service Station, NM
Traband Warehouse, OK
Oklahoma Refining Co., OK
Petto-Chemical Systems, Inc., OU 2, TO
North Cavalcade Street, TX
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
French Limited, TX
South Cavalcade Street, TX
Koppen/Texarkana, TX
United Creosoting, TX
Kelly AFB, Site 1100, TX
Matagorda Island AF Range, TX
Baldwin Waste Oil TX
PD
PD
D/I
PD
PD
D
PD
PD
D/I
O
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Other
Other
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Other
Other
Removal
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
22
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Technology Type
Region 7
Site Name, State
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
People's Natural Gas, IA
Chemplex (OU 2), IA
McGraw Edison, IA
Coteman Operable Unit 29th and Mead, KS
Pester Refinery Co., KS
Scott Lumber, MO
Crown Plating, MO
Lee Chemical, MO
Hastings GW Contamination (Colorado Ave), ME
Hastings GW Contamination (Far-Mar Co.), NE
Hastings GW Contamination, Well No. 3, NE
Lindsay Manufacturing, NE
Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE
Sherwood Medical, NE
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
23
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Technology Type
Site Name, State
Sand Creek Industrial, OU 5, CO
Sand Creek Industrial OU 1, CO
Chemical Sales Company, OU 1, CO
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace), CO
Rocky Mtn Arsenal OU 18, interim resp., CO
Ft Carson, CO
Rocky Flats OU 2, Interim Remedial Action, CO
Broderick Wood Products OU 2, CO
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT
Former Glasgow AFB, MT
Idaho Pole Company, MT
Mouat Industries, MT
Montana Pole and Treating Plant, MT
Montana Pole/Treating (Ground water), MT
Wasatch Chemical, UT
Utah Power and Light/American Barrel, UT
Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20, OU 2, WY
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a=Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
24
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Technology Type
Region 9
Region
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State
Aua Fuel Farm, Aua Village, American Samoa,
Indian Bend Wash, South Area, OU 1, AZ
Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ
Stanford Pesticide #1, AZ
Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area (N. & S. Fac), AZ
LukeAFB,AZ
Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35, AZ
Davis Monthan AFB, AZ
Hassayampa Landfill, AZ
Indian Bend Wash, AZ
Williams AFB, (OU2), AZ
National Semiconductor (Monolith Memories), CA
Spectra Physics, OU 1, CA
J.H. Baxter, CA
Koppers Company, Inc. (Orovilk Plant), CA
Rosevilk Drums, CA
Solvent Service, CA
Fairchild Semiconductor (San Jose), CA
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-I, CA
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-II, CA
IBM (San Jose), CA
Status
O
D
C
C
D
O
C
I
C
D
D
0
O
O
D
D/I
C
0
C
D/I
D/I
0
Action
Other
Remedial
Removal
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Other
Other
Other
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
pr^
y*>
y c
r
s ^
y \
y*
y ci
y*
y<
Y\
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
25
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Intersil/Siemens, CA
Raytheon, Mountain View, CA
Watkins-Johnson, CA
Monolithk Memories/AMD - Arques, SU 2, CA
Van Waters and Rogers, CA
Pacific Coast Pipeline, CA
Sacramento Army Depot, Tank 2 OU, CA
USMC, Mtn. Warfare Center, Bridgeport, CA
Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station IR Site 14, CA
McClellanAFB OUD.CA
Ft Ord Marina, Fritzche AAF Fire Drill Area, CA
Purity Oil Sales OU 2, CA
Jasco Chemical Co., CA
Signetics(AMD901) (TRW), Signetics OU, CA
Lawrence Livennote National Laboratory, CA
Sacramento Army Depot (Bum Pits OU), CA
Lorentz Barrel and Drum (OU 1), CA
HexceUCA
Intersil, CA
U. S. Public Works Center, Guam, GU
Poly-Carb. NV
O
O
O
D
D
O
PD
D
O
O
PD
PD
O
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Other
Other
Other
Other
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Other
Removal
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
26
-------
Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
Region 10
Technology Type
Region
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
*
Site Name, State
FtWainwright,AK
Eielson Air Force Base, AK
Union Pacific Railroad Sludge Pit, ID
United Chrome Products, OR
Gould, Inc. OR
UmaoHa Army Depot Activity, Soil Op Unit, OR
Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma Well 12A, WA
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor Site A, OU 1, WA
Drexkr-RAMCOR,WA
Harbor Island, WA
FairchiW AFB OU 1 Craig Rd LF., WA
FairchiW AFB, Priority 1 OU's (OU 2) FT-1, WA
Fort Lewis Mil Res. Lf 4 & Sol. Refined Coal, WA
Booneville Power Administration, OU A, WA
Naval Communication Station, Scottland
Status
0
O
PD
O
O
D/I
0
I
C
PD
D
D
D
I
C
Action ^^
Other
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Removal
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
Remedial
- *
f *
VS <
ys
r
y*
Y*9
/**
y*
X<
Y\
»
ai
Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete
Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs
Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification
* Naval Communication Station is located in Scottland, not in Region 10.
27
-------
-------
Appendix A
Innovative Technologies at Superfund Remedial Actions
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
TABLE A-l
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table A-l is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for remedial sites for which an
innovative treatment has been selected. The columns of Table A-l present the following information:
Region
This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located.
Site Name, State, ROD Date
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected.
A Record of Decision (ROD) documents the selection of remedy in the remedial program. The date shown in this column is the date
on which a ROD was signed by an EPA official.
An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example, within
the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of
innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently
selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites.
Media (quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has been
made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another parameter significant to the application.
A-l
-------
TABLE A-l (Continued)
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. Other contaminants may
also be listed that may be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not to be addressed by the listed technology, are
not included.
Status
This column indicates the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been
signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the
services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is
in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed, the
lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is completely
installed and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document for
that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased.
One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the project. Whenever possible,
the season and year in which the current phase will end is given. The information is identified as the "completion planned" date.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
The "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible parties
will conduct the remedy with oversight by EPA or the State (PRP lead). If aremedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/construction
through its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) may
act for EPA to manage the design or construction. No matter what agency or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the
contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead organization has
selected a contractor.
Contacts/Phone
This final column provides the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is usually
the EPA remedial project manager (RPM) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and phone number
of the state RPM also is provided. Information on other useful contacts may also be provided.
A-2
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
June 1994
Region
1
2
2
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Iron Horse Park*, MA
(09/15/88)
General Motors/Central
Foundry Division, OU
1, NY (12/17/90)
General Motors/Central
Foundry Division, OU
2. NY (03/31/92)
Specific
Technology
Land treatment
Slurry phase
Slurry phase
Site Description
Industrial and
railyard waste
Machine shops,
Engine casting
facility
Aluminum casting
plant
Media (Quantity)
Sludge (25,000
cy)
Soil (100,000
cy), Sludge
(91,000 cy) from
lagoon. Sediments
(62,000 cy)
Soil (59,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PAHs
PCBs
PCBs
Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
II and Treatment II
II Contractor (if II
|| available) ||
Operational;
Completion
planned Suimer
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Suimer
1995; Remedy
being
reconsidered;
thermal
desorption and
solvent
extraction
also being
evaluated
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1995; Remedy
being
reconsidered;
thermal
desorption and
solvent
extraction
also being
evaluated
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
Consulting
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Don McElroy
617-223-5571
Lisa Carson
212-264-6857
Lisa Carson
212-264-6857
A-3
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
3
3
4
4
4
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Uhitmoyer
Laboratories, OU 3, PA
(12/31/90)
Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas, UV
(09/29/89)
Brown Wood
Preserving*, FL
(04/08/88)
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil Washing
Dubose Oil Products*,
FL (03/29/90)
Specific
Technology
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Land treatment
Land treatment
Slurry phase
(preceded by
soil washing)
Solid phase
Windrowing with
aeration and
irrigation in a
barn
Site Description
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Wood preserving,
Drum storage/
disposal
Wood preserving.
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Media (Quantity)
Soil and sediment
combined (5,600
cy)
Soil (13,500 cy)
Soil (8,100 cy)
Soil fines from
approximately
6,400 cy
Soil (30,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE), SVOCs
(Aniline)
PAHs
(Carcinogenic
PAHs)
PAHs (Creosote)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Benzenes,
Xylenes), SVOCs
(PCP), PAHs
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1998;
Treatability
study underway
Completed;
Operational
from 1/89 to
7/90
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned
December 1994;
Operation
began 11/93
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Envi ron
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ABB
Environmental
(Design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technology,
Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Wastech
Contacts/Phone
Chris Corbet t
215-597-8186
Melissa
Whittington
215-597-1286
Ann Marie
Gallespie
404-347-6255
Patsy Goldberg
404-347-6265
Mark Fite
404-347-6263
George Linder
(FL)
904-488-0190
A-4
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
4
4
4
4
.
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Whitehouse Waste Oil
Pits (amended ROD)*,
FL (06/16/92)
See also Soil Washing
Math is Brothers -
South Marble Top Road
Landfill, GA
(03/24/93)
Benfield Industries,
NC (07/31/92)
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC
(06/30/89)
See also Soil Washing
Helena Chemical, SC
(09/08/93)
See also
Dechlorination
Specific
Technology
Slurry phase
proceeded by
soil washing
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Land treatment
Slurry phase;
may be followed
by s/s
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Anaerobic and
aerobic
Site Description
Waste oil recycler
Landf i 1 1 operat i on
Bulk chemical
mixing and
repackaging plant.
Wood preserving
Retail sales
outlet for
agricultural
chemicals
Media (Quantity)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Residuals from
soil washing
Soil (97,700 cy)
Soil (4,300 cy)
fines from soil
washing
Soil (2,400 cy);
Also fines from
soil washing
Soil quantity
unknown
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs, PCBs, PAHs
VOCs, SVOCs,
Biocides
SVOCs (Creosote)
VOCs, PAHs
VOCs (Diesel
fuel), Biocides
(DDT, Aldrin,
Dieldrin,
Chlordane,
Toxaphene)
Status* Lead Agency
and Treatment
II Contractor (if
|| available)
In design;
Remedy being
reconsidered;
further site
character izati
on underway
In design;
Operation
planned to
start Spring
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned early
1995
Design
completed but
not installed;
will be
installed no
earlier than
Summer 1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1994
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Engineering
Science
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Ensafe
Contacts/Phone
Tony Best
404-347-6259
Charles King
404-347-6262
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
Bernie Hayes
404-347-7791
Adrian Felder
(SO
803-734-5390
A-5
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Para-Chem Southern,
Inc., SC (09/27/93)
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
(06/30/89)
Cliffs/Dow Dump*, MI
(09/27/89)
Burlington Northern
Railroad Tie Treating
Plant*, HN (06/04/86)
Specific
Technology
Slurry phase
Land treatment
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Land treatment
Site Description
Manufacturing
Plant - products
include polymers,
latex, coatings,
adhesives
Wood preserving
Waste disposal for
charcoal
manufacturing
plant
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity)
Sludge(200 cy)
Soil (15,200 cy)
Soil (9,500 cy)
Soil (9,500 cy).
Sludge(9,500 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (1,1,1-TCA,
DCA, PCE), SVOCs
SVOCs (PCP,
Phenols), PAHs
(Creosote)
VOCs (TCE, BTEX),
SVOCs (Phenol),
PAHs
(Naphthalene)
SVOCs (Phenols,
Creosote), PAHs
Status*
Predesign;
Currently
conducting a
treat ability
study
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1997
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994;
Reconsidering
which material
will be
treated
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
State lead/Fund
Financed; The
Fletcher Group
(prime), RMT
(subcontractor)
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
(Design)
PRP
lead/State- Fede
ral oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
Contacts/Phone
Terry Tanner
404-347-7791
ext (4117)
Mike K lender
(SC)
803-734-5471
Brad Bradley
312-886-4742
Fred Nika (IL)
217-782-6760
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
Tony Rutter
312-886-8961
Fred Jenness
(MN)
612-297-8470
Richard Truax
(RETEC)
303-493-3700
A-6
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Jun.e 1994
Region
5
5
5
6
6
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Joslyn Manufacturing
and Supply Co., MN
Allied Chem & Ironton
Coke, OU 2*, OH
(12/28/90)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Other
Technologies
Moss-American*, WI
(09/27/90)
See also Soil Washing
Popile, AR (02/01/93)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Old Inger oil
Refinery*, LA
(09/25/84)
Specific
Technology
Land treatment
Un lined
treatment unit
with irrigation
and tilling
Land treatment
Slurry phase
preceded by soil
washing
Land treatment
Land treatment
Site Description
Wood preserving
Coke manufacturing
Wood preserving
Inactive wood
preserving
operation
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants
Treated
II
Soil (75,000 cy)
Soil (30,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown); fines
from soil washing
Soil and Sludge
combined (156,000
cy)
Soi 1 and Sludge
combined (120,000
cy)
SVOCs (PCP, PAHs)
PAHs
PAHs
SVOCs (PAHs,
Phenols)
VOCs (Benzene,
Ethylbenzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment
Contractor (if II
|| available) ||
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned early
1995
Predesign; PD
completion
planned 1995;
Bench -scale
study is
underway
Predesign; RFP
for design to
be issued Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
2001
PRP lead/State
oversight; BARR
Engineering/GL
Contracting,
Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; IT
Corporation
(prime
contractor.
design)
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Weston,
Inc. (prime
contractor)/IT
Corporal ion( sub
contractor)
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
State lead/Fund
Financed;
Uestinghouse
Haztech
(installation).
Operation to
start Fall 1994
Kevin Turner
312-886-4444
Ann Bi dwell
(MN)
612-296-7827
Tom Alcamo
312-886-7278
Russ Hart
312-886-4844
Paul Sieminski
214-655-8503
Paul Sieminski
214-655-8503
Tom Stafford
(LA)
504-765-0487
A-7
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
6
6
6
t
6
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Pab Oil & Chemical
Services, LA
(09/22/93)
Prewitt Abandoned
Refinery, NM
(09/30/92)
See also Soil vapor
extraction. Other
Technologies
Oklahoma Refining Co.,
OK (06/09/92)
See also
Broreififdiation 'In
Citii)
North Cavalcade
Street*, TX (06/28/88)
Specific
Technology
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
followed by s/s
for inorganics
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
followed by s/s
Land treatment
Site Description
Disposal site for
oily drilling mud
Crude oil refinery
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity)
Soil (10,900 cy).
Sludge (15.500
cy). Sediments
(520 cy)
Soil (1,500 cy).
Sludge (1,200 cy)
Soil and sludge
combined (56,000
cy). Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
Soil (5,500 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PAHs
(Carcinogenic and
Non-carcinogenic)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
VOCs, Organics
(LNAPLs)
PAHs (Creosote)
Status*
P redesign;
Design to
begin October
1994; A
treatability
study wi 1 1
determine the
type of
bioremediation
P redesign
In design;
Phase 1 to be
completed
4/95; Phase 2
to be
completed 5/96
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
aval table)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
State lead/Fund
Financed
State lead/Fund
Financed
Contacts/Phone
James Van
Buski rk
214-665-6767
Monica
Chapa-Smith
214-655-6780
Philip Allen
214-665-8516
Glenn Celerier
214-655-85Z3
Stephen Chong
(TX)
512-239-2441
A-8
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
6
7
8
8
8
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Sheridan Disposal
Services*, TX
(12/29/88)
Vogel Paint & Wax, I A
(09/20/89)
Broderick Wood
Products OU 2, CO
(03/24/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant)*, HT
(09/27/89)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Idaho Pole Company*,
MT (09/28/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), In situ
Flushing
Specific 1 Site Description
Technology II
If
II
Slurry phase
Land treatment
using four cells
Land treatment
Land treatment;
using 12-acre
unit
Land treatment
Industrial
landfill
Paint/ ink
formation
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants
II Treated
||
II
Soil (13,000 cy)
effected soils.
Sludge (30,000
cy) of oils and
sludge
Soil (40,000 cy)
Soil (85,000 cy).
Sediments (120
cy)
Soil (54,000 cy)
excavated soil
Soil (19,000 cy).
Sediments (2,683
cy)
VOCs (Benzene,
Toluene), SVOCs
(Phenols), PCBs
VOCs (Methyl
Ethyl Ketone,
BTX)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
PAHs (Creosote)
SVOCs (PCP, PAHs)
Status*
P redesign;
Pilot study
conducted in
1991; Awaiting
entry of
consent
decrees by
court to begin
design
Operational;
Completion
planned 1997
Operational;
Operation
started August
1994;
Completion
planned 2001
Operational;
Operation
began 9/93;
Completion
planned 1999 -
2002
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Lead Agency || Contacts/Phone
and Treatment II
Contractor (if II
aval lable) ||
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Vogel
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CH2M
Hill
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Gary Baumgarten
214-655-6749
Jack Generaux
913-551-7690
Bob Drustrup
(IA)
515-281-8900
Armando Saenz
303-293-1532
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
(ext. 260)
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
(ext. 260)
A-9
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
II
II
8
8
8
9
9
Libby Ground Water
Contamination*, HT
(12/30/88)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Montana Pole and
Treating Plant, NT
(09/21/93)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), In situ
Flushing
Wasatch Chemical*, UT
(03/29/91)
See also In situ
Vitrification
J.H. Baxter*, CA
(09/27/90)
Jasco Chemical Co., CA
(09/30/92)
Specific
Technology
Land treatment
using two 1-acre
cells, soil is
excavated &
mixed
Land treatment
Land treatment
on an asphalt
pad
Land treatment
followed by
fixation for
metals
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ) may
combine aerobic
and anaerobic
Site Description | Media (Quantity) II Key Contaminants
Treated
II II
1 Jl
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Pesticide
manufacturing/use/
storage, Other
organic chemical
manufacturing,
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Wood preserving
Chemical blending
and repacking
Soil (45,000 cy)
Soil (208,000 cy)
Soil (1,100 cy)
Soil (30,000 cy)
Soil (1,095 cy)
VOCs (Benzene),
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
(Creosote)
SVOCs (PCP,
Dioxins, PAHs)
VOCs (Toluene,
Xylene)
SVOCs (PCP,
Dioxins, PAHs)
VOCs (DCA,
Methylene
chloride,
Acetone, Xylene)
Status*
Operational;
Completion
planned 1999
Predesign; In
negotiation
Completed;
Operational
from 10/92 to
12/93
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1994
In design;
Pilot-scale
treatabi lity
study planned
Spring 1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avai lable)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Woodward- Clyde
In negotiation
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Harding/Lawson
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/Phone
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
(ext. 260)
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERL)
405-332-2313
Sara Weinstock
406-782-7415
Bert Garcia
303-293-1537
Kathy Set i an
415-744-2254
Rosemarie
Carroway
415-744-2235
A-10
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
10
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Umatilla Army Depot
Activity, Soil
Operable Unit*, OR
(09/30/92)
Bonneville Power
Administration, OU A,
WA (05/06/93)
Spec i f i c
Technology
Composting
Solid phase
Site Description
Explosives washout
Research and
Testing Facility
Media (Quantity)
Soil (7,000 cy)
Soil (500 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Explosives (TNT,
RDX)
PAHs (PCP)
Status*
Design
completed but
not installed;
Contract
awarded;
Operation
scheduled for
mid-Fall 1994
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Fall
1994;
Operation to
be completed
by Winter 1994
Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available) ||
Army lead/EPA
and State
oversight;
Bioremediation
Services, Inc.
Federal
facility /EPA
and State
oversight
Harry Craig
503-326-3689
Mark Daugherty
(US Army)
503-564-5294
Hike Nelson
(USAGE Seattle)
206-764-3458
Nancy Harney
206-553-6635
A-ll
-------
Table A-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY TECHNOLOGY THROUGH FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ)
June 1994
Region
1
2
2
2
3
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Hocomonco Pond, ESD,
MA (09/30/85)
FAA Technical Center*,
NJ (09/26/89)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Applied Environmental
Services
(Groundwater), NY
(06/24/91)
Applied Environmental
Services, OU 1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also Soil vapor
extraction. Other
Technologies
Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (09/30/93)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Specific Site Description
Technology
II
II
In situ
groundwater
In situ
groundwater Pump
& treat followed
by H202 addition
and reinjection
through
inf i Itration
galleries
In situ
groundwater, in
conjunction
w/air sparging &
nutrient
addition
In situ soil;
Bi eventing
In situ soil
Wood preserving
Jet fuel tank farm
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility.
fuel blending
Landfill site drum
disposal area
Media (Quantity)
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Soil (quantity
unknown).
Groundwater depth
to gw avg. 8 feet
Soil (14,050 cy)
Key Contaminants II Status*
Treated
||
1
PAHs (Creosote),
Organics (DNAPLs)
VOCs (JP-4)
VOCs (BTEX)
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate)
VOCs (Benzene,
TCE, PCE,
Methylene
Chloride)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Fall
1995
Being
installed
Being
installed;
Remedial
action to
start in Fall
1994
Being
installed;
Operation to
start
September 1994
Predesign; In
negotiation
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
Facility, FAA
lead; R.E.
Wright
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc. (Design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/Phone
Bob Leger
617-573-5734
Carla St ruble
212-264-4595
Keith Buch
(FAA)
609-485-6644
Mel Haupton
212-264-7681
John Grathwol
518-457-9280
Mel Hauptman
212-264-7681
John Grathwol
(NY)
518-457-9280
Eric Newman
215-597-0910
A-12
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
4
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Soil Washing
Peak Oil/Bay Drums OU
1, FL (06/21/93)
See also In situ
Flushing
Seymour Recycling, IN
(09/30/87)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Seymour Recycling
(Groundwater), IN
(09/30/87)
Allied Chem & Ironton
Coke, OU 2*. OH
(12/28/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Other
Technologies
Specific
Technology
In situ soil;
Treating
above/below gw
table by
nutrient
addition
In situ soil
In situ soil
Nutrients plowed
into soil
In situ
groundwater; Gw
treatment
incidental to
soil treatment
Bioremediation
(In Situ) of
lagoon sediments
Site Description
Wood preserving.
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Waste oil
re- refinery
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Coke manufacturing
Media (Quantity)
Soil (5,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (190,000 cy)
12 acres to a
depth of 10 feet
Groundwater under
12 acres
Sediments
(457,000 cy) from
a lagoon
Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
Treated and Treatment
II I) Contractor (if 1
II || available) ||
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
VOCs (PCE,
Ethylbenzene),
SVOCs (PAHs),
PCBs
VOCs (TCA, Carbon
Tetrachloride,
TCE)
VOCs, SVOCs, PAHs
PAHs
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
Completed;
Operational
from 1/87 to
6/90
Operational;
Gw treatment
was not
designed but
appears to be
occur ing as a
result of in
situ soil
treatment
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994;
Operation
planned to
begin Spring
1995
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
McLaren- Hart
(Design
contractor)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ABB
Environmental
Services
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty Miller
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; IT
Corporation
(prime
contractor).
Black & Veetch
(subcontractor)
Patsy Goldberg
404-347-6265
David Abbot
404-257-2643
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
Tom Alcamo
312-886-7278
A-13
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
5
5
6
6
6
6
Site Name, State, || Specific
(ROD Date) Technology
Hagen Farm Site,
Groundwater Control
OU, WI (09/30/92)
Onalaska Municipal
Landfill*. UI
(08/14/90)
Popile, AR (02/01/93)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
American Creosote
Works, Inc. (Uinnfield
Plant), LA (04/28/93)
Atchi son/Santa
Fe/Clovis, NM
(09/23/88)
Oklahoma Refining Co.,
OK (06/09/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
In situ
grounduater
In situ soil;
air injection
but no nutrient
or microbe
addition
In situ
groundwater
In situ soil
In situ soil
In situ soil
Site Description
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal landfill
Municipal landfill
Inactive wood
preserving
operation
Wood preserving
Railyard wastes
(diesel spills)
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Media (Quantity)
Groundwater
Soil (16,000 cy)
to a depth 11 -15
feet
Groundwater
Soil (250,000 cy)
Soil (28,600 cy),
Sludge combined,
6 feet deep
Soil (43,300 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Vinyl
Chloride, MEK,
Xylene)
PAHs
(Naphthalene)
NAPLS
SVOCs (PCP,
Creosote), PAHs
PAHs (petroleum
hydrocarbons,
diesel fuel)
VOCs, Organics
(LNAPLs)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995
Operational;
Completion
sometime
between 1996
and 2000.
Predesign; RFP
for design to
be issued Fall
1994
Design
completed but
not installed;
Completion
planned Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned end of
1996;
Operation
began 6/92
In design;
Phase 1 to be
completed
4/95; Phase 2
to be
completed 5/96
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Warzyn (prime
contractor)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CH2M
Hill (prime
contractor)
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CDM
Federal
Programs
(design
contractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Radian
Corporation
State lead/ Fund
Financed
Contacts/Phone
Steve Padovani
312-353-6755
Kevin Adler
312-886-7078
Paul Sieminski
214-655-8503
Bert Griswold
214-655-8502
Ky Nichols
214-665-6783
Phillip Allen
214-665-8516
A-14
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
6
7
7
8
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
French Limited, TX
(03/24/88)
People's Natural Gas,
1A (09/16/91)
Pester Refinery Co.,
KS (09/30/92)
See also In situ
Flushing
Broderick Wood
Products OU 2, CO
(03/24/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Specific
Technology
Bioremediation
(In Situ) In
Situ Lagoon
In situ soil;
injection of
nutrients and
oxygenated water
to treat both
saturated and
unsaturated soil
In situ soil
proceeded by in
situ soil
flushing
In situ soil and
in situ gw
bi eventing of
soil & aquifer;
solids following
free product
recovery and
dewatering
Site Description
Petrochemical
Coal gasification
Refinery operation
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Status*
Treated
II II
II II
Soil and Sludge
combined (300,000
cy)
Soil (18,500 cy)
Soil (70,000 cy)
Soil 20 acres; 10
feet to rock
VOCs, PAHs
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
PAHs
(Benzo(a)anthrace
ne, Chrysene)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
Completed;
Operational
1/92 - 12/93
Design
completed but
not installed;
pilot study
underway;
decision to
expand the
system will be
made in Fall
1994
Predesign
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment II
Contractor (if
avai lable) ||
PRP Judith Black
lead/Federal 214-655-6735
oversight 1
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight; BARR
Engineering
PRP lead/State
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CH2M
(prime
contractor)
Bill Bunn
913-551-7792
Cathy Barret
913-551-7704
Rachel Miller
913-296-1676
Armando Saenz
303-293-1532
A-15
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
8
8
8
8
8
Site Name, State, II Specific II Site Description
(ROD Date) II Technology II
I! II
IL II
Burlington Northern
(Soraers Plant)*, HT
(09/27/89)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Idaho Pole Company*,
MT (09/28/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), In situ
Flushing
Libby Groundwater
Contamination*, MT
(12/30/88)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Montana Pole and
Treating Plant, MT
(09/21/93)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), In situ
Flushing
Montana Pole and
Treating Plant
(Groundwater), MT
(09/21/93)
In situ
groundwater
Carbon treatment
aboveground;
treatment
followed by
nutrient and
pure oxygen
addition prior
to reinjection
In situ
groundwater;
injection of
oxygen and
nutrients
In situ
groundwater;
Injection of
H202 and
Potassium
tripolyphosphate
In situ soil
In situ
groundwater
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity)
Groundwater 2
areas, 20 ft deep
and 30 ft deep
Groundwater down
to 30 feet deep
Groundwater (40 -
80 ft deep)
Soil (44,000 cy)
Groundwater
Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Creosote)
SVOCs (PCP, PAHs)
VOCs (Benzene),
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
(Creosote)
SVOCs (PCP,
Dioxins, PAHs)
SVOCs (PCP,
Dioxins, PAHs)
Status*
Operational;
Operational
since May
1994;
completion
date unknown
Predesign
Operational;
Completion
planned 2001;
Operation
began in
Spetember 1991
Predesign; In
negotiation
Predesign; In
negotiation
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avai I able)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Woodward-Clyde
In negotiation
In negotiation
Contacts/Phone
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
(ext. 260)
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
(ext. 260)
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
(ext. 260)
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERL)
405-332-2313
Sara Weinstock
406-782-7415
Sara Weinstock
406-782-7415
A-16
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
9
9
10
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Williams AFB, (OU2),
AZ (12/30/92)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Kexcel, CA (09/21/93)
See also Soil vapor
extraction, Other
Technologies
Koppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(04/04/90)
See also Soil Washing
Eielson Air Force
Base*, AK (09/29/92)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Fairchild AFB,
Priority 1 OU's (OU 2)
FT-1, WA (07/14/93)
See also Other
Technologies
Specific
Technology
Bioremediation
In Situ;
Bioventing
In situ soi I
In situ soil
In situ soil;
Bioventing
Bioremediation;
In Situ
Bioventing
Site Description II Media (Quantity)
II
||
II
AFB, Flight
Training Base
Manufacturing
Wood preserving
Tactical air
support
installation
Airplane fueling
and maintenance
Fire training area
Soil (54,000 cy)
down to 25 feet
deep
Soil (quantity
unknown).
Groundwater
Soil (110,000 cy)
to a depth of 10
ft
Soil (quantity
unknown) down to
10 ft deep
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
Treated and Treatment
II || Contractor (if |
|| || available) ||
VOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
1,2-DCA,
Methylene
Chloride), PAHs
(TPH)
VOCs (PCE,
Acetone, MEK,
Benzene)
SVOCs (PCPs),
PAHs
VOCs (JP-4),
SVOCs, PAHs
(Petroleum
Hydrocarbons,
Diesel)
VOCs (Benzene)
Being
installed;
Full-scale
operation to
start 1/95
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
Design
completed but
not installed;
installation
postponed
until
completion of
removal action
Operational
In design;
Pilot test
starting 5/94
USAF - IRP/ EPA
and State
Oversight;
Earth
Technologies
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; SBP
Technologies
Federal
Facility/EPA
and State
oversight;
DERA; EA
Engineering
(Design)
USAF/ Federal
oversight; E.S.
Inc.
R. Mendoza
415-744-2407
William Harris
(USAF)
602-988-6486
Mark Johnson
510-286-0305
Fred Schauffler
415-744-2359
Mary Jane
Near-man
206-553-6642
Rielle Harkey
(AK)
907-451-2117
Capt. Max Gandy
(Eielson AFB)
907-377-4361
Cami
Grandinetti
206-553-8696
A-17
-------
Tabie A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Chemical Treatment
June 1994
Region
4
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
JFD
Electronics/Channel
Master, NC (09/10/92)
Specific
Technology
Oxidation of
cyanides
followed by
on-site s/s for
metals
Site Description
Solvent recovery
Media (Quantity)
Soi I and Sludge
combined, (3,000
cy>
Key Contaminants
Treated
Inorganic
cyanides
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1995
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/Phone
McKenzie
Mallary
404-547-7791
A-18
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific information By Technology Through FY 1993
Dechlorination
June 1994
Region
2
2
3
4
4
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Myers Property, NJ
(09/28/90)
See also Soil Washing
Wide Beach
Development, NY
(09/30/85)
Saunders Supply Co, OU
1. VA (09/30/91)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Smith's Farm Brooks,
OU 1*. KY (09/30/91)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Helena Chemical, SC
(09/08/93)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Specific
Technology
Dechlorination
Dechlorination
with APEG using
an anaerobic
thermal process
unit
Dechlorination
Dechlorination
(part of
anaerobic
thermal
treatment)
Dechlorination
Site Description
Pesticide
manufacturing/use/
storage
Contaminated road
dust, driveways,
ditches
Wood preserving
Drum storage/
disposal
Retail sales
outlet for
agricultural
chemicals
Media (Quantity)
Soil (48,000 cy),
Sediments (500
cy)
Soil (40,000 cy)
Sludge (700 cy)
K001 RCRA waste
from a lagoon
Soil (18,500 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
Treated and Treatment
II Contractor (if I
|| || available) ||
SVOCs
(Chlorobenzene),
Biocides (DDT,
DDE, ODD),
Dioxins
PCBs
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins
PCBs
VOCs (Diesel
fuel), Biocides
(DDT, Aldrin,
Dieldrin,
Chlordane,
Toxaphene)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1996; Design
concurrent
with
treat ability
studies
Completed;
Operational
from 9/90 to
9/91
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995
Operational;
Operation
began in April
1994;
completion
planned
October 1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Metcalf & Eddy
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Soil Tech Inc.
(subonctractor
to Kimmins)
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canon ie (prime
contractor),
Soi I Tech
(subcontractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Ensafe
John Prince
212-264-1213
Herb King
212-264-1129
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Tony DeAngelo
404-347-7791
Bernie Hayes
404-347-7791
Adrian Felder
(SC)
803-734-5390
A-19
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
In situ Flushing
June 1994
Region
2
2
2
2
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Lipari Landfill (OU
2)*, MJ (09/30/85)
Vineland Chemical, OU
1 and OU 2, NJ
(09/29/89)
See also Soil Washing
Byron Barrel & Drum,
NY (09/29/89)
Pas ley Solvents and
Chemicals, Inc., NY
(02/24/92)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Specific
Technology
Soil flushing
Flushing of area
within the
slurry wall.
including soil
and wastes.
Soil flushing
Flushing lagoons
using treated gw
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
Site Description
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal landfill
Pesticide
manufacturing/use/
storage
Drum storage/
disposal
Tank farm and
chemical
distribution
facility
Media (Quantity)
Soil (650,000 cy)
16 acres to a
depth of 15 feet
Soil (126,000 cy)
to a depth of 15
feet in sandy
soil
Soil (5,200 cy),
Groundwater
Soil (13,000 cy)
down to 30 feet
deep
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs
(Bis-2-chloroethy
lether, DCA,
Dichloromethane),
SVOCs (Phenol),
Metals (Chromium,
Lead, Nickel,
Mercury)
Metals (Arsenic)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
TCA, Methyl Ethyl
Ketone), Metals
(Chromium, Lead)
SVOCs
(Naphthalene)
Status*
Operational;
Completion
planned 1999
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1995
P redesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Negotiation
with PRP is
going on for
new design.
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; AWD,
Inc.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Malcolm Pirnie
(Design)
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed;
Ebasco (design)
Contacts/Phone
Fred Cataneo
212-264-9542
Matthew
Westgate
212-264-3406
Steve Hade I
(USACE-Kansas
City)
816-426-5221
Eduardo
Gonzales
212-264-5714
Sherrel Henry
212-264-8675
A-20
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
In situ Flushing (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
4
4
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh
Plant) OU 2, AL
(09/30/91 )
See also Thermal
Desorption
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh
Plant) OU 4, AL
(07/14/92)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Peak Oil/Bay Drums OU
1, FL (06/21/93)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Specific
Technology
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
Site Description
Agriculture
applications,
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage. Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Agriculture
applications,
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage, Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Waste oil
re- refinery
Media (Quantity)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Benzene,
Chloroform,
Toluene),
Biocides (DDD,
DDT, DDE, BHCs,
Diazinon,
Chlorobenzi late).
Metals (Lead)
VOCs (Chloroform,
Toluene,
Xylenes),
Biocides
(Atrazine,
Diazinon,
Prometryn,
Simazine), Metals
(Copper, Lead,
Arsenic,
Chromium, Iron
slurry)
VOCs (PCE,
Ethy (.benzene).
SVOCs (PAHs),
Metals (Lead,
Zinc, Chromium)
Status*
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Winter
1995;
Treatability
studies
ongoing; final
decision on
technology
will be made
late 1994
Predesign;
Treatability
studies
ongoing; final
decision on
technologies
will be made
late 1994
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
CDM/FPC
(Demolition/Des
ign
contractors)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
F i nanced
Contacts/Phone
Charles King
404-347-6262
Charles King
404-347-6262
David Abbot
404-347-2643
A-21
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
In situ Flushing (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
5
5
6
6
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
JADCO- Hughes, NC
(09/27/90)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(06/30/89)
Rasmussen Dump, MI
(03/28/91 )
Koppers/Texarkana*, TX
(09/23/88)
See also Soil Washing
South Cavalcade
Street*, TX (09/26/88)
See also Soil Washing
Specific || Site Description
Technology II
II
II
Soil flushing
Preceded by
vacuum
extraction using
the same
horizontal wells
In situ Flushing
of area inside
slurry wall
Soil flushing
(flushing part
of recycle of
treated gw)
Soil flushing
with reinjection
of treated water
to 1 ft below
surface
Soil flushing
with the same
surfactants used
for the soils
treated with
soil washing
Plastics
manufacturing,
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing.
Drum storage/
disposal,
Municipal water
supply
Industrial
landfill
Industrial
landfill,
Paint/ ink
format i on
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity) || Key Contaminants
II Treated
|
II
Soil (6,000 cy)
Soil (64,000 cy).
Ground water
Soil seepage
(basin size
unknown)
Soil (19,400 cy)
below 1 ft.
treated by
reinjected water
Soil (20,000 cy)
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
Chloride, Carbon
Tetrachloride.Chl
orofor, BTX),
SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
T r i ch I orobenzene )
VOCs (TCE, BTEX)
VOCs (Vinyl
Chloride,
Benzene)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Creosote), Metals
(Arsenic)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo( a ) anth racen
e, Chrysene)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned
December 1994
Completed
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design
P redesign;
Technology on
hold pending
remediation of
groundwater
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Conestoga- Rover
s & Associates
(prime
contractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Fluor-Daniel
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Woodward Clyde
(prime
contractor)
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight; ENSR
(RD/RA
contractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/Phone
Michael
Townsend
404-347-7791
Bruce Nicholson
(NC)
919-733-2801
Bernard Schorle
312-886-4746
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6743
Glenn Celerier
214-655-8523
A-22
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
In situ Flushing (continued)
June 1994
Region
7
7
8
8
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Pester Refinery Co.,
KS (09/30/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Lee Chemical, MO
(03/21/91)
Idaho Pole Company*,
HT (09/28/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Montana Pole and
Treating Plant, MT
(09/21/93)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Union Pacific Railroad
Sludge Pit, ID
(09/10/91)
Specific
Technology
Soil flushing
followed by in
situ
bioremediation
Soil flushing
with 3
infiltration
galleries; 10 ft
x 50 ft each
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
Site Description
Refinery operation
Solvent recovery
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Railroad
operations,
cleaning and
fueling
Media (Quantity)
Soil (70,000 cy).
Sludge (30,000
cy)
Soil (30,000 cy)
20 ft to gw
Soil (6,500 cy)
Soil (44,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PAHs
(Benzo(a)anthrace
ne, Chrysene)
VOCs (TCE)
SVOCs (PCP, PAHs)
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins, PAHs
VOCs (PCE,TCE),
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons).
Metals
(Arsenic, Cadmium)
Status*
P redesign
Operational;
Completion
planned 1999;
Operation
began 5/94
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
P redesign; In
negotiation
P redesign;
Remedy being
reconsidered
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment
Contractor (if I
available) ||
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight; (no
treatment
contractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
In negotiation
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Cathy Barrett
913-551-7704
Marvin
Glotzbach (KS)
913-296-2783
Steven Kinser
913-551-7728
Ron Redden (MO)
314-751-8393
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
(ext. 260)
Sara Ueinstock
406-782-7415
Ann Williamson
206-553-2739
Clyde Cody (ID)
208-334-0556
A-23
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
In situ Flushing (continued)
June 1994
Region
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
United Chrome
Products*. OR
(09/12/86)
Specific
Technology
Soil flushing
Site Description
Chrome plating
facility
Media (Quantity)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Metals (Chromium
VI)
Status*
Operational;
Operations
began during
Sumer 1988
and ui 1 1
continue until
GU standard is
met.
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avai table)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
CHZNHill &
subcontractors
Contacts/Phone
Alan Goodman
503-326-3685
A-24
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
In situ Vitrification
June 1994
Region
5
8
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Ionia City Landfill*,
MI (09/29/89)
Uasatch Chemical*, UT
(03/29/91)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Specific
Technology
In situ
Vitrification
In situ
Vitrification
consolidation of
soil & waste in
pond prior to
treatment
Site Description
Municipal landfill
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage. Other
organic chemical
manufacturing.
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Media (Quantity)
Soil (5,000 cy)
with debris, to a
depth of 15 feet
Soil, sludge, and
solids combined
to 5 feet deep
(1.500 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Methylene
Chloride, TCA,
Styrene,
Toluene), Metals
(Lead)
VOCs, SVOCs
(Hexachloro-
benzene, PCP),
Biocides, Dioxins
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1995
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
planned Fall
1994: Project
completion
planned Spring
1995; awaiting
vendor
availability
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geosafe
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
GeoSafe
Contacts/Phone
Michael Gifford
312-886-7257
Bert Garcia
303-293-1537
A-25
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction
June 1994
Region
1
1
1
1
1
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (09/29/89)
Linemaster Switch
Corporation, CT
(07/21/93)
Groveland Wells*, MA
(09/30/88)
Sit res im, HA
(09/19/91)
Wells G&H OU 1, MA
(09/14/89)
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
(carbon
absorption for
air emissions)
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Site Description
Solvent recovery.
Industrial
complex, illegal
dumping of solvent
was
Electrical power
switches manu.
facility
Manufacturing
Chemical waste
reclamation
Drum storage/
disposal. Leaking
UST and midnight
dumping
Media (Quantity)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (19,000 cy)
to a depth of
25-30 feet
Soil (137,000 cy)
Soil (7,400 cy)
to a depth of 3
feet
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
DCE, TCA, DCA,
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE,
Methylene
Chloride, DCE)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Chloroform,
Styrene)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
Status* [I Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
11 and Treatment
Contractor (if
|| available) |]
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Predesign
Operational
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Winter
1994
Operational;
OU 1 consists
of 5
properties,
the techno I gy
has become
operational on
some of the
properties.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; GZA
Geoenvi ron-
mental (Design)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Terra Vac
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Several
contractors
working on the
site
Leslie McVickar
617-573-9689
Elise Jakabhazy
617-573-5760
Bob Leger
617-573-5734
Mark Otis
617-573-5797
Mary Garren
617-573-9613
Paula
Fitzsimmons
(MA)
617-223-5572
A-26
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
1
1
1
1
1
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Union Chemical Co., OU
1, ME (12/27/90)
Hottolo Pig Farm, NH
(03/29/91)
South Municipal Water
Supply Well*, NH
(09/27/89)
See also Other
Technologies
Tibbetts Road*, NH
(09/29/92)
Tinkham Garage (OU
1)*, NH (09/30/86)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction ; Air
sparging of gw
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
(carbon
absorption for
air emissions)
Site Description
Solvent recovery.
Paint stripping
Uncontrolled waste
site
Ball bearing
manufacturing
Illegal dumping
site, primarily
painting wastes
and solvents
Illegal dumping
site
Media (Quantity)
Soil (10,000 cy)
Soil (3,400 cy)
Soil (7,500 cy).
Groundwater
Soil (50,000 cy)
down to 20 feet
Soil (9,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs
(TCE,DCE,PCE,Xyle
ne)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Vinyl Chloride,
DCA, DCE,
Toluene,
Ethylbenzene)
VOCs (PCE, TCA,
TCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
VOCs (TCE,
Chloroform, DCE,
Vinyl chloride,
Benzene)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
1995;
Operation
started
October 1993
Installed but
not
operational;
Operation
begins October
1994:
Completion
planned 2011
Predesign
In design;
Operation
scheduled to
begin summer
1994
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment
Contractor (if II
available) ||
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Balsam
Environmental/
VAPEX
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed;
Metcalf & Eddy
(prime
contractor) OH
Materials
(subcontractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
In negotiation
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Terra Vac
Terrance
Connelly
617-573-9638
Christopher
Rushton (ME)
207-287-2651
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Joe Donovan
(NH)
603-271-2911
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Tom Andrews
(NH)
603-271-2910
Darryl Luce
617-573-5767
Tom Andrew (NH)
603-271-2010
Jim Di Lorenzo
617-223-5510
A-27
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
1
1
1
2
2
Site Name, State, Specific
(ROD Date) Technology
II
Jl
Peterson/Puritan Inc.
(OU 1), RI (09/30/93)
See also Other
Technologies
Picillo Farm Site, RI
(09/27/93)
Stamina Mills, RI
(09/28/90)
A 0 Polymer, Soil
treatment phase, NJ
(06/28/91)
FAA Technical Center*,
NJ (09/26/89)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
(carbon
adsorption for
air emissions)
Soil vapor
extraction
Site Description
Custom
manufacturing
facility
Industrial and
commercial area
Disposal area
Textile
manufacturing
Polymer
manufacturing
Jet fuel tank farm
Media (Quantity) II Key Contaminants
Treated
II
||
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (131,000 cy)
Soil (6,000 cy)
to a depth of 12
feet
Soil (7,500 cy)
to a depth of 30
feet
Soil (33,000 cy)
VOCs (1,1,1 -
TCA, PCE, TCE)
VOCs, SVOCs,
Biocides, PCBs
VOCs (DCE, TCE)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
T r i ch 1 orof I uorome
thane, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
4-methylphenol)
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs
(Chlorophenol,
Phenol)
Status*
Predesign; EPA
negotiating
with PRP
Predesign; EPA
negotiating
with PRP
Predesign; PD
completion
planned
January 1995
In design;
Remedial
construction
will be
completed Fall
1994
Being
installed;
Operation
scheduled
1/95;
completion
scheduled for
2000 or later
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
State lead/Fund
Financed
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Environmental &
Safety Design
Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Harding- Lawson
Federal
Facility, FAA
lead; R.E.
Wright (prime
contractor)
Contacts/Phone
Dave Newton
617-573-9612
Leo Hellested
(RI)
401-277-2797
Anna Krasko
617-573-5749
Neil Handler
617-573-9636
Mark Dermen
(RI)
401-277-2797
Rich Puvogel
212-264-9836
Carla Struble
212-264-4595
Keith Buch
(FAA)
609-485-6644
A-28
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Garden State Cleaners,
NJ (09/26/91)
Naval Air Engineering
Center, OU 23, NJ
(09/27/93)
South Jersey Clothing,
NJ (09/26/91)
Swope Oil & Chem Co.,
OU 2, NJ (09/27/91)
Applied Environmental
Services, OU 1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Other
Technologies
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Vacuum
extract! on. Biove
nting (Not
planned yet)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
with air
sparging; area
will be covered
Site Description
Dry cleaners
Fuel storage farm
Dry cleaners.
Clothing
manufacturer
Chemical
reclamation
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility.
fuel blending
Media (Quantity)
Soil (300 cy) 25
ft deep; 3 feet
by 10 feet
Soil (3,500 cy)
Soil (1,400 cy)
to a depth of 25
feet
Soil (253,000 cy)
2 acres, to a
depth of 80 feet
Soil depth to gw
averages 8 ft
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (PCE)
VOCs, PAHs (TPH,
Naphthalene)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Toluene,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene)
VOCs (BTEX)
Status* Lead Agency
and Treatment
II Contractor (if
|| available)
Operational;
Operation
began in June
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995
Design
completed but
not installed;
Design
completed in
3/94;
construction
to start in
Summer of 1994
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
Federal
Facility/
Federal
Oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; USACE
(design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty &
Miller (design)
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
Contacts/Phone
Sharon Atkinson
212-264-1217
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
Sharon Atkinson
212-264-1217
Joseph Cowers
212-264-5386
Mel Hauptman
212-264-7681
John Grathwol
(NY)
518-457-9280
A-29
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
2
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Circuitron
Corporation, OU 1, MY
(03/29/91)
Genzale Plating
Company, OU 1, NY
(03/29/91)
Hat ti ace
Petrochemicals
Company, OU 1, NY
(06/27/91)
Pas ley Solvents and
Chemicals, Inc., NY
(02/24/92)
See also In situ
Flushing
SMS Instruments (Deer
Park), NY (09/29/89)
Vestal Water Supply
1-1, NY (09/27/90)
Specific II Site Description || Media (Quantity) II Key Contaminants
Technology II Treated
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
precedes
excavation for
off-site
solidification
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
catalytic
combustor for
vapors
Soil vapor
extraction
Electroplating
Electroplating
Organic chemicals
blending
Tank farm and
chemical
distribution
facility
Military aircraft
component
overhauler
Industrial park
Soil (900 cy) to
a depth of 30 ft
Soil (275 cy) to
a depth of 30 ft
Soil (17,000 cy)
to a depth of 40
feet
Soil (13,000 cy)
down to 30 feet
deep
Soil (1,250 cy)
to a depth of 25
feet
Soil (25,000 cy)
Both areas =
25,000 cy, to 28
ft depth
VOCs (TCA, PCE,
TCE, DCA)
VOCs (TCE, TCA)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,,
Benzene, Xylene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Benzene)
VOCs (TCE,
Dichlorobenzene)
VOCs (DCA, TCA,
TCE, DCE)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Negotiation
with PRP is
going on for
new design.
Completed;
Operational
from 4/92 to
12/93
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available) ||
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; ICF
(design
contractor)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ebasco
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed;
Ebasco (design
contractor)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Four
Seasons
Area 2 - Fund
lead; Area 4 -
PRP lead S.V.E
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
Edward Als
212-264-0522
Sherrel Henry
212-264-8675
Jim Bologna
(NY)
518-459-3976
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
Ed Als
212-264-0522
A-30
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 199.4
Region Site Name, State, II Specific
|| (ROD Date) I Technology
2
2
3
3
3
3
Janssen Inc., PR
(09/30/93)
Upjohn Manufacturing
Co., PR (09/30/88)
Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (09/30/93)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Bendix, PA (09/30/88)
Cryochem, OU 3, PA
(09/30/91)
Lord-Shope Landfill*,
PA (06/29/90)
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
(method to be
determined in
design)
Site Description
Pharmaceutical
Manufacturing
Industrial
facility, chemical
leak
Landfill site drum
disposal area
Aircraft
instrumentation
manufacturing
Machine shops,
Metal fabrication
Industrial
landfill
Media (Quantity)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (50,000 cy)
Soil (33,000 cy)
to a depth fo 10
feet
Soil (70 cy) up
to 4 ft deep
Soil (270,000 cy)
to a depth of 30
feet
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Chloroform)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Acetonitrile)
VOCs (Benzene,
TCE, PCE,
Methylene
Chloride)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (TCA, TCE,
PCE, DCA, DCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
Vinyl Chloride,
Alcohols,
n-butanol), SVOCs
(Ketones)
Status* Lead Agency
|| and Treatment
|| Contractor (if
I) available)
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Fall
1994
Completed;
Operational
1/83 - 3/88
Predesign; In
negotiator!
Predesign;
Treatability
study
completed and
being reviewed
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1995
Design
completed but
not installed
Federal
lead/ Fund
F i nanced
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Terra Vac
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight; ERM,
Inc.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CH2M
Hill
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Eckenfelder
Contacts/Phone
Adalberto
Bosque
809-729-6951
Alison Hess
212-264-6040
Eric Newman
215-597-0910
Jim Harper
215-597-6906
Joe McDowel I
215-597-8240
Dave Turner
215-597-3218
A-31
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region || Site Name, State,
jl (ROD Date)
II
II
3
3
3
3
3
4
Raymark*, PA
(12/30/91)
Saegertown Industrial
Area Site, PA
<01/29/93)
See also Other
Technologies
Tyson's Dump*, PA
(03/31/88)
Arrowhead
Associates/Scovi U, (XI
1, VA (09/30/91)
Defense General Supply
Center, OU 5*, VA
(03/25/92)
Hollingsworth
Solderless, FL
(04/10/86)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
(The system has
been modified
during
operations)
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soil vapor
extraction (one
extraction well)
Soil vapor
extraction
Site Description I] Media (Quantity) II Key Contaminants II Status*
II Treated I
II II II
_JI JL JL
Hulti -source metal
fabrication
facility
Industrial park
(Lord Corp.
property)
Abandoned septic
and chemical waste
disposal site
Electroplating
Cleaning and
repainting of
combat helmets and
gas cylinders
Electroplating
Soil (quantity
unknown). Solids
bedrock
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (30,000 cy)
with some
DNAPL.to a depth
of 30 feet
Soil (1,000 cy)
depth unknown
Soil (1,000 cy)
Soil (60 cy)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
1,2-DCE)
VOCs (TCE, TCA)
VOCs (Benzene,
Toluene, Xylene),
SVOCs (Trichloro-
propane)
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
chloride)
Operational;
since May 1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1995
Operational;
since 11/88;
completion
date unknown
Predesign; In
negotiation
with PRP
Completed;
Consisted of
pilot study
12/1/92-12/11/
92; after
which soil
samples showed
no further
contamination
Completed;
Operational
from 1/91 to
7/91
Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
and Treatment ||
Contractor (if II
avai lable) ||
Federal
lead/Fund
F i nanced
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Terra Vac
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ICF
Kaiser
Federal
Facility DLA
Lead/Federal
oversight;
Engineering-Sci
ence
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ebasco
Harry Harbold
215-597-1101
Steve Donohue
215-597-3166
Bob Kimball
814-332-6075
Eugene Dennis
215-597-3153
Ron Davis
215-597-1727
Jack Potosnak
215-597-2317
Bill Sadington
(DGSC)
804-279-3781
John Zimmerman
404-347-2643
A-32
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
4
4
4
4
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Robins AFB, Landfill
and Sludge Lagoon, OU
1, GA (06/28/91)
Charles Hacon Lagoon,
Lagoon *7, OU 1, NC
(09/30/91 )
JADCO- Hughes, NC
(09/27/90)
See also In situ
Flushing
USNC Canp Lejeune
Military Base, OU 2,
NC (09/24/93)
Medley Farm, OU 1, SC
(05/29/91)
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Followed by in
situ flushing
with same ports
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Site Description
Federal facility.
sludge from an
industrial waste
water treatment
plant
Petroleum refining
and reuse. Drum
storage/disposal.
Waste oil recycler
Plastics
manufacturing.
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing.
Drum storage/
disposal.
Municipal water
supply
Drum storage/
disposal
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Rubber
manufacturing.
Drum storage/
disposal
Media (Quantity)
Soil (15,000 cy)
combined, to a
depth of 8 feet.
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
Soil (1,300 cy)
combined
Soil (6,000 cy)
Soil (16,500 cy)
Soil (50,000 cy)
max i nun depth
60ft
Key Contaminants 1 Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
Treated II II and Treatment
II I Contractor (if ||
II || available) ||
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl Chloride,
Carbon
Tetrachloride)
VOCs (PCE)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride.
Chloroform, Vinyl
chloride, BTX),
SVOCs
(D i ch I orobenzene ,
Tr ich lorobenzene)
VOCs (DCE, PCE,
TCA, Vinyl
Chloride)
VOCs (DCA, DCE,
TCA, TCE, PCE,
Methylene
Chloride), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
P redesign; PD
completion
planned Summer
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned
December 1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
completion
planned for
January 1995
Federal
Facility, USAF
Lead/Federal
Oves
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; RMT
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Conestoga-Rover
s & Associates
(prime
contractors)
USMC
Lead/ Federal
Oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; RMT,
Inc.
Liz Wilde
404-347-3016
Giezelle
Bennett
404-347-7791
David Lown (NC)
919-733-2801
Micheal
Towns end
404-347-7791
Bruce Nicholson
(NC)
919-733-2801
Gena Townsend
404-347-3016
Ralph Howard
404-347-7791
Richard Haynes
(SC)
803-734-5487
A-33
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
4
5
5
5
Site Name, State, Specific
(ROD Date) Technology
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
(09/12/90)
Carrier Air
Conditioning*, TN
(09/03/92)
Acme Solvent
Reclaiming, Inc. CXI 3
& OU 6, IL (12/31/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
American Chemical
Services*, IN
(09/30/92)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Enviro. Conservation
and Chemical (ROD
Amendment), IN
(06/07/91)
I
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing for
OU 6
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
bioenhancement
for SVOCs;air
flushing
w/vertica wells
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Status#
Treated
fl
Ji II IL
Drum storage/
disposal. Solvent
recovery
Manufacturer of
heating and air
conditioning units
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal water
supply
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Solvent recovery
Chemical recycler
(solvents)
Soil (45,000 cy)
to a depth of 12
feet
Soil (76,500 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (100,000 cy)
15 to 20 ft deep
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (TCA, TCE,
PCA, PCE, DCA,
DCE, MEK,
Chlorobenzene,
BTEX)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (DCA, TCA,
DCE, TCE, PCE,
Vinyl Chloride,
Benzene)
VOCs, PCBs
VOCs (Toluene,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene), SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
Phenol), Organ ics
(BNAs)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
Design
completed but
not installed;
Design-
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
Predesign;
Schedule
pending
completion of
negotiation
In design;
Design
completion
planned for
Fall 1995
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ERM
DeMaximus to
organize all
PRPs
contractors
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Environmental
Safety &
Designs, Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Harding/Lawson
In negotiation
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/Phone
Steve Sandier
404-347-7791
Beth Brown
404-347-7791
Deborah Orr
312-886-7576
Bill Bolen
312-353-6316
Karen Vend I
312-886-4739
A-34
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Fisher Calo Chem, IN
(08/07/90)
HIDCO I, IN (06/30/89)
MIDCO II, IN
(06/30/89)
Main Street Well
Field, IN (03/29/91)
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Site Description
Municipal water
supply
Industrial
landfill
Drum storage/
disposal
Solvent recovery.
Water supply
contamination from
many sources
Media (Quantity) II Key Contaminants
II Treated
||
II
Soil (29,500 cy)
Soil (10,000 cy)
to a depth of 4 -
8 feet
Soil (12,200 cy)
Soil (22,000 cy)
to a depth of 10
feet
VOCs (PCE, DCA,
TCA)
VOCs (TCE,
Dichloromethane,
Chlorobenzene,
2-Butanone, BTX),
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs
VOCs (Methylene
chloride, TCE,
2-Butanone,
Toluene)
VOCs (TCE)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1995
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Winter
1994;
Implementation
planned for
1996
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Winter
1996;
Bench-scale
treatability
study is
underway
In design;
East site (60%
design
completion by
June 1, 1993)/
West site (95
% design in
progress)
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
avai I able)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Connestoga
Rovers - Prime
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ERM
Northcentral-pr
ime
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight; ERM
Northwest-prime
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty &
Miller
Contacts/Phone
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
Richard Boice
312-886-4740
Rich Boice
312-886-4740
Deborah Orr
312-886-7576
A-35
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Seymour Recycling, IN
(09/30/87)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Wayne Waste
Reclamation, IN
(03/30/90)
Chem Central, MI
(09/30/91)
Clare Water Supply, NI
(09/16/92)
Electro-Voice, OU 1,
MI (06/23/92)
Specific Site Description Media (Quantity)
Technology II
Soil vapor
extraction (No
need for
emissions
treatment)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soil vapor
extraction
(vapor treatment
through carbon)
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
air flushing
with vertical
wells
Soil vapor
extraction
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Municipal
landfill. Oil
reclamation
Chemical packaging
and distribution
Industrial area
with above/below
ground tanks- -
multi source
groundwater site
Audio equipment
manufacturer
Soil (200,000 cy)
12 acres to a
depth of 10 feet
Soil (300,000 cy)
10 acres to a
depth of 20 feet
Soil (6,200 cy)
to 8 ft deep
Soil (54,800 cy)
vadose zone &
dewatered area to
25 ft deep
Soil (2,100 cy)
down to 50 feet
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCA, Carbon
tetrachloride,
PCE, TCE, Vinyl
chlorie. Benzene)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Vinyl chloride,
BTEX)
VOCs (DCE, TCE,
TCA, BTEX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
2-methyl
naphthalene)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Vinyl chloride,
BTEX)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride),
PAHs
Status*
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
1995
Design
completed but
not installed;
Design
completed Feb
2/94
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1994
P redesign;
Design planned
to begin
Spring 1994
P redesign; PD
completion
planned Spring
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
(installation),
Geraghty &
Miller
(operation)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Warzyn, Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; WW
Engineering &
Science
Federal Lead/
PRP Funded;
Seacore
Environmental
Engineering
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Fishbeck,
Thompson, Carr,
& Huber
Contacts/Phone
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
Duane Heaton
312-886-6399
Colleen Hart
312-353-8752
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Eugenia Chow
312-353-3156
A-36
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Kysor of Cadillac
Industrial*, MI
(09/29/89)
Peerless Plating, HI
(09/21/92)
Springfield Township
Dump, MI (09/29/90)
Sturgis Municipal Uell
Field, MI (09/30/91)
ThermoChem. Inc. OU 1,
MI (09/30/91)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing ;
May include
biological
enhancement
Site Description
Machine shops,
Truck parts
manufacturing
Electroplating
Industrial
landfill
Solvent recovery
Recycling facility
for organic
solvents.
Media (Quantity)
Soil (13,200 cy)
Soil (6,500 cy)
depth to 7 feet
Soil (28,000 cy)
Soi I Area and
depth unknown, <
200 ft. deep
Soil (50,000 cy)
to a depth of 17
- 32 feet
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE,
Xylene, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene)
VOCs (1,2-DCE,
TCE, Benzene,
Ethylbenzene)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Chlorobenzene,
Toluene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
TCA)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned
December 1994
In design;
negotiating
with PRP
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Fishbeck,Thomps
on,Carr,& Huber
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; PRC
Envi ronmenta I
Management ,
Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
State lead/Fund
Financed
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; ACOE
(Design)
Contacts/Phone
Leah Evison
312-886-4696
Tom Pay
312-886-5991
Mary Lou Martin
312-353-9660
Terese Van
Donsel
312-353-6564
Steve Padovani
312-353-6755
Jim Hahnenberg
312-353-4213
A-37
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Verona Well Field
(Thomas
Solvent/Raymond
Road)*, MI (08/12/85)
Verona Well Field, OU
2, MI (06/28/91)
Long Prairie
Groundwater
Contamination, MN
(06/27/88)
Miami County
Incinerator, OH
(06/30/89)
Spec i f i c
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction (with
Nitrogen
sparging during
part of
operation)
Soi I vapor
extraction
Augmentation
with air
flushing is
being considered
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
followed by GAC
for off-gas
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Treatment of
off-gas
determined in
design
Site Description
Municipal water
supply
Machine shops.
Municipal water
supply
Dry cleaners
Municipal
landfill. Surface
impoundment
Media (Quantity)
Soil (35,000 cy)
one half acre to
a depth of 18
feet
Soil (30,000 cy)
Soil (3,600 cy)
to a depth of 15
feet
Soil and solids
combined (98,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs
(Dichloromethane,
Chloroform,
Carbon
Tetrachloride,
BTEX, Vinyl
chloride), SVOCs
(Napthalene)
VOCs (PCE, TCA,
Toluene)
VOCs (DCE, PCE,
TCE, Vinyl
chloride)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Toluene)
Status*
Completed;
Operational
from 3/88 to
5/92
Operational
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
to begin
Spring 1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment II
Contractor (if
available) ||
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; Terra
Vac
(subcontractor
to CH2M Hill)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Geraghty &
Miller (Prime),
Maumee Bay
(Remedial
subcontractor)
State lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Connestogo
Roveis-Prime
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
Jan Bartlett
312-886-5438
Maureen Johnson
(MN)
612-296-7353
Anthony Rutter
312-886-8961
A-38
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Jupe 199,4
Region
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State, I Specific
(ROD Date) || Technology
I!
Pristine (ROD
Amendment)*, OH
(03/30/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Skinner Landfill
(OU2), OH (06/04/93)
Zanesville Well Field,
OH (09/30/91)
See also Soil Washing
City Disposal
Corporation Landfill,
WI (09/28/92)
Hagen Farm Source
Control OU, WI
(09/17/90)
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal
trenches down to
15 feet
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi t vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
followed by
excavation and
soil washing for
metals
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Site Description
Industrial waste
treatment facility
Sanitary landfill
and buried
industrial waste
Lagoon
Solvent recovery,
Auto parts
manufacturing
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal landfill
Industrial and
municipal waste
disposal
Media (Quantity)
Soil (19,400 cy)
3 acres and 15
feet deep
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (36,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown) quantity
Soil (67,000 cy)
Key Contaminants Status*
Treated
||
VOCs (Chloroform,
DCA, PCE, TCE,
Benzene), SVOCs
(Phenol)
VOCs
(Toluene, Xylene,
TCA)
VOCs (TCE, DCE)
VOCs
(Tetrahydrofuran)
VOCs (Vinyl
chloride,
2-Butanone,
BTEX), Organics
(Tetrahydrofuran)
Being
installed;
installation
to be
completed late
1994; will
operate 7-10
years
P redesign; PD
completion
planned Summer
1995;
evaluating
technical
feasibility
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
P redesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Summer
1996
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
aval I able)
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Canoni e
(installation)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; Rust
Environmental
(prime
contractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Warzyn- Prime
Contacts/Phone
Thomas Alcamo
312-886-7278
Bruce
Sypniewski
312-886-6189
Dave Wilson
312-886-1476
FTS-886-1476
Russ Hart
312-886-4844
Mike Schmoller
(WI)
608-275-3303
Steve Padovani
312-353-6755
A-39
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
5
5
6
6
7
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Muskego Sanitary
Landfill, Interim
Action OU 1, UI
(06/12/92)
Wausau Groundwater
Contamination, UI
(09/29/89)
Preuitt Abandoned
Refinery, NM
(09/30/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Other
Technologies
Pet ro- Chemical
Systems, Inc., OU 2,
TX (09/06/91)
See also Other
Technologies
Chemplex (OU 2), IA
(05/12/93)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Off-Gas
Treatment
Soil vapor
extraction with
Air Sparging
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing and
air sparging of
groundwater
Soil vapor
extraction
Site Description
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal landfill
Machine shops.
Bulk chemical
distribution
Crude oil refinery
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Landfill
Media (Quantity)
Soil (300 cy)
approximately 1
acre down to 15
ft deep
Soil (1,300 cy)
to a depth of 30
feet
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (300.000 cy)
to a depth of 30
feet
Soil (350,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Vinyl
Chloride,
1,2-OCA,
Methylene
Chloride, BTEX)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
PCE)
Organics (NAPLs)
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene)
VOCs (Benzene,
TCE)
Status*
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
planned Summer
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Sunnier
1995
P redesign
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Summer
1995
Predesign;
Negotiations
with PRPs
ongoing
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
aval I able)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; Rust
(Design)
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Hydrogeo-Chem
(sub to
Cones toga -Rover
s & Associates)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Contacts/Phone
Bill Haubold
312-353-6261
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
Monica
Chapa- Smith
214-655-6780
Chris Villareal
214-655-6758
Nancy Johnson
913-551-7703
A-40
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 199.4
Region
7
7
7
7
7
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
McGraw Edison, I A
(09/24/93)
Coleman Operable Unit
29th and Mead, KS
(09/29/92)
Hastings GU
Contamination
(Colorado Ave)*, NE
(09/28/88)
Hastings GU
Contamination (Far-Mar
Co.)*, NE (09/30/88)
Hastings GU
Contamination, Uell
No. 3*. NE (09/26/89)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Site Description
Former
manufacturing unit
Formerly vehicle
manufacturing,
currently heating,
air conditioning
equipment
manufacturing
Industrial metal
f i ni sh i ng/c I eani ng
Former grain
storage area
(fumigants)
Former grain
storage area
(fumigants)
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Status*
Treated
II il
II II
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (2,000,000
cy)
Soil (42,700 cy)
Soil targeting
layers at 35 ft
and 110 ft
Soil 1 acre down
to 120 feet deep
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE,
1,1,1-TCA, DCE,
Vinyl chloride.
Toluene)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
DCE, TCA)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride.
Ethylene
di bromide)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride)
Predesign;
Unilateral
Order for
RD/RA is
prepared
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994; Soil
vapor system
already in
place. ROD
calls for
expansion of
the system
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Completed;
Operational
from 7/92 to
5/93
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment I
Contractor (if I]
avai I able) J|_
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Groundwater
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight; ENSR
(design
contractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Burns &
McDonald
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Morrison
Knudsen
Pauletta France
913-551-7701
Ken Rapplean
913-551-7769
Darrel
Somnerhauser
913-551-7711
Richard
Schlenker (NE)
402-471-3388
Susan Hoff
913-551-7786
Diane Easley
913-551-7797
A-41
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
I Region || Site Name, State, II Specific Site Description
I (ROD Date) Technology
II II II
II ll IL
7
7
8
8
8
Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE (09/28/90)
Waver ly Groundwater
Contamination, NE
(09/26/90)
Chemical Sales
Company, OU 1*, CO
(06/27/91)
Martin Marietta
(Denver Aerospace), CO
(09/24/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Rocky Flats OU 2,
Interim Remedial
Action Plan, CO
(08/10/92)
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
will address hot
spots only
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
will recirculate
treated
emissions
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Electroplating,
Galvanized pipes
for irrigation
systems
Grain storage
(fumigants)
Chemical sales and
distribution.
spillage at tank
farm
Aerospace
equipment
manufacturer -
bulk storage
facility
Former nuclear
weapons research
and development,
production, and
plutonium
reprocessing
complex
Media (Quantity)
Soil targeting a
depth of 25 - 40
feet
Soil (160,000 cy)
up to 240,000
cy(5 acres, 20-30
ft deep)
Soil (360,000 cy)
to 35 ft deep
Soi I Less than
one acre, depth
unknown
Soil (25,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (DCA, OCE,
TCE, PCE)
VOCs (Carbon
tetrachloride.
Chloroform)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Carbon
tetrachloride)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned 2001;
operat i ona I
since 2/88
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Summer
1995
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Dames & Moore
USDA
Lead/Federal
Oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
PRP/State
overs ite under
RCRA; Geraghty
& Miller
DOE
Lead/Federal
Oversight DOE
ERP; Woodward
Clyde, Roy F.
West on, Layne
Envi ronmental
Contacts/Phone
Cecelia Tapla
913-551-7733
Jeff
Weatherford
913-551-7695
Mary Hansen
(Argonne
National Lab)
708-972-4938
Jim Berkley
303-293-1817
George Dancik
303-293-1506
Charles Johnson
303-692-3348
Bill Frazier
303-294-1081
Scott Grace
(Rocky Flats)
303-966-7199
A-42
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
8
8
8
9
9
Site Name, State, II Specific
(ROD Date) Technology
JL
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
OU 18, interim
response, CO
(02/26/90)
Sand Creek Industrial
OU 1*, CO (09/29/89)
Utah Power and
Light/American Barrel,
UT (07/07/93)
Hassayampa Landfill*,
AZ (08/15/92)
Indian Bend Wash Area,
AZ (09/27/93)
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Site Description
Motor pool area
Pesticide
manufacturing/use/
storage, Refinery
Coal gasification
Industrial
landfill
Dry cleaners,
Eletroplating,
Industrial
Landfill
Media (Quantity)
Soil (70,000 cy)
100 feet radius
and 60 feet deep
Soil (38,000 cy)
Soil (15,000 cy)
Soil
Approximately 10
acres
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants II Status* II Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
Treated and Treatment I
II || Contractor (if ||
|| || available) ||
VOCs (TCE,
Ethylbenzene,
Toluene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Methylene
chloride.
Chloroform)
VOCs (Styrene),
PANs
(Naphthalene)
VOCs (1,1-DCE,
1,1,1-TCA,
1,2-DCE, 1,1-DCA,
TCE, 1,2-DCB)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
DCE, 1,1,1-TCA)
Completed;
Operational
from 7/91 to
12/91
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994; Removed
70 tons to
date
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Spring
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995;
Pilot-scale
study
completed
In design
U. S. Army
lead; Roy F.
West on, Ebasco,
Harding Lawson,
Woodward Clyde
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; OHM
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Conestoga- Rover
s, Errol L.
Montgomery &
Ass., Inc.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; CH2M
HILL
Stacey Eriksen
303-294-1083
Janes Smith
(Rocky Mtn
Arsenal)
303-289-0249
Erna Acheson
303-294-1971
David Ostrander
303-293-1530
Robert Riccio
415-744-2369
Emily Roth
415-744-2367
Jeff Dhont
415-744-2363
Winifred Au
(AZ)
510-251-2888
(Ext. 2126)
A-43
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Indian Bend Wash,
South Area, OU 1, AZ
(09/12/91)
Motorola 52nd Street,
AZ (09/30/88)
Phoenix- Goodyear
Airport Area (North &
South Fac), AZ
(09/26/89)
Williams AFB, (OU2),
AZ (12/30/92)
See also
Bioreroediation (In
Situ)
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
May vary
technology at
different
facilities
within
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Bioenhancement
Site Description
Dry cleaners,
Electroplating,
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal landfill
Manufacturing
facility
Defense related
manufacturing
AFB, Flight
Training Base
Media (Quantity)
Soi I maximum
depth - 90 ft
Soil 60 ft radius
to a depth of 25
feet
Soil (271,200 cy)
North: 1,200 cy;
South: 270,000
cy, 60 ft deep
Soil (54,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA)
VOCs (TCA, TCE,
DCE, PCE,,
Ethylbenzene)
VOCs (DCE, TCE,
MEK, Acetone)
VOCs (Benzene 4,
Dichlorobenzene,
1,2-DCA Ethyl
Benzene), SVOCs
Status*
In design;
Pilot project
under the
Superfund
Accelerated
Cleanup Model
initiative.
schedules may
vary by unit
In design;
Design
completion
planned 1995;
Pilot system
operational
but full scale
technology
still being
evaluated
Operational
Operational;
Operation
began 3/94
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
mixed funding
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Dames and Moore
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Me tea If & Eddy
- South Area,
Ma I come Pirnie
- North Area
USAF (EPA
Overs ite);
Earth
Technologies
Contacts/Phone
Jeff Dhont
415-744-2363
Fred Schauffler
415-744-2359
Jeff Kulon (AZ)
602-207-4181
Hotline
602-207-4360
Craig Cooper
415-744-2370
Raman Mendoza
415-744-2407
Dr. William I.
Harris (USAF)
602-988-6486
A-44
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Fair-child
Semiconductor (San
Jose)*, CA (03/20/89)
Fair-child
Semiconductor/MTV- I*,
CA (06/09/89)
Fail-child
Semiconductor/MTV- 1 I*,
CA (06/30/89)
Hexcel, CA (09/21/93)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Other
Technologies
IBM (San Jose}*, CA
(12/15/88)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Site Description
Semi conductor
manufacturing
Semi conductor
manufacture and
metal finisher
Semiconductor
manufacturing.
Metal finishing
facility
Manufacturing
Computer
manufacture
Media (Quantity)
Soil (42,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (50,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (24,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCA,
1,1 -DCE,
Freon-113,
Isopropyl
alcohol, PCE),
Xylene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl Chloride,
OCA, DCE, Freon),
SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl Chloride,
DCA, DCE, Freon),
SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs (PCE,
Acetone, MEK,
Benzene)
VOCs (TCA,
Acetone, Freon,
Isopropyl
Alcohol, Xylenes)
Status* Lead Agency
and Treatment
|| Contractor (if
(I available)
Completed;
operational
from 1/89 to
5/90
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
planned
October 1994
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
planned
October 1994
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
2001
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Terra Vac
Contacts/Phone
Helen McKinley
510-744-1889
Steve Hill (CA)
510-286-0433
Elizabeth Adams
415-744-2235
James Boarer
(Canonie)
415-744-2231
Thomas Jones
(Fairchild)
415-960-0822
Elizabeth Adams
415-744-2235
James Boarer
(Canonie)
415-960-1640
Thomas Jones
(Fairchild)
415-960-0822
Mark Johnson
510-286-0305
Steve Hill (CA)
510-286-0433
A-45
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region II Site Name, State,
II (ROD Date)
II
II
9
9
9
9
9
Intel, Mountain View*,
CA (06/09/89)
Intersil, CA
(09/27/90)
Intersi 1 /Siemens, CA
(09/27/90)
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory,
CA (07/15/92)
Lorentz Barrel and
Drum (OU 1), CA
(08/26/93)
Specific || Site Description Media (Quantity)
Technology II II
II II
II II
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Semi conductor
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Research and
development
facility
Drum recycling
business
Soil (3,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (50,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride.
DCA, DCE, Freon),
SVOCs (Xylene)
VOCs (TCE,
1,1,1-TCA,
Xylene)
VOCs (TCE,
1,1,1-TCA,
Xylene)
VOCs (Fuel
hydrocarbons)
VOCs
Status*
In design;
Operation
planned Spring
1995
Completed
Operational;
Ongoing at
Siemens,
completed at
Intersil Fall
1993
In design
P redesign;
Design to
begin Summer
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Weiss
Associates
State lead/Fund
F i nanced
State lead/Fund
Financed;
Levine-Fricke
(Siemens)
DOE
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; URS
Contacts/Phone
Elizabeth Adams
415-744-2235
Eric Madera
408-522-7048
Michael Haley
(CA)
510-450-6159
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
Roshy Mozafar
(CA)
510-286-1041
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
Steve Morse
(CA)
510-286-0304
Roshy Mozafar
510-286-1041
Mike Gill
415-744-2383
Darrin
Swartz-Larson
415-744-2233
A-46
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
9
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Monolithic
Memories/AMD - Arques,
Subunit 2, CA
(09/11/91)
National Semiconductor
(Monolithic Memories),
CA (09/11/91)
Pacific Coast
Pipeline, CA
(03/31/92)
Purity Oil Sales 00 2,
CA (09/30/92)
Raytheon, Mountain
View*. CA (06/09/89)
Sacramento Army Depot
(Burn Pits OU), CA
(03/29/93)
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Site Description
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Petroleum refining
and reuse, ;
petroleum pumping
station
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Semiconductor
manufacturing,
Metal refinishing
and aircraft
maintenance
Electro- Optics
equipment repair,
metal plating &
Treatment painting
Media (Quantity)
Soil (3,400 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (64,000 cy)
Soil (15,000 cy)
Soil (16,900 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA), PAHs
VOCs (PCE, DCE,
Toluene,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene), SVOCs
VOCs (Methlyene
chloride, DCA,
Benzene, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Chlorobenzene,
BTEX)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
DCE), SVOCs
(Phenol)
VOCs, SVOCs
Status*
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1996; Started
operation in
Spring 1993
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1996
In design
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Winter
1994
In design;
Installation
planned to
start January
1996
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994;
operational
since Spring
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
State lead/Fund
F i nanced;
Pacific
Environmental
Group
State lead/Fund
Financed;
Harding Lawson
& Associates
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonic
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Groundwater
Technology Inc.
U.S. Army
(IRPVEPA
Overs ite; OHM
Contacts/Phone
Cecil Felix
(CA)
510-286-1249
Cecil Felix
(CA)
510-286-1249
Cathy Mooremery
415-744-2243
Joanne Cola
415-744-2238
Elizabeth Adams
415-744-2235
Eric Madera
(PRP)
415-966-7772
Mar I in Mezquita
415-744-2393
Dan Osburn
(SAD)
916-388-4344
A-47
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Sacramento Army Depot,
Tank 2 OU, CA
(12/09/91)
Signetics (AMD 901)
(TRW), Signetics OU,
CA (09/11/91)
Solvent Service, CA
(09/27/90)
Spectra Physics, OU 1,
CA (03/22/91)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
heat enhancement
Soi I vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Site Description
Solvent storage
tank at an Army
Depot
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Solvent recycling
facility
Semi conductor
manufacturing.
Laser
manufacturing
Media (Quantity)
Soil (150 cy)
Soil (32,000 cy)
approximately 1/4
acre down to 20
feet
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (7,200 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (PCE,
Ethyl benzene and
Total Xylenes)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
DCA)
VOCs (TCA,
Acetone,
Ethyl benzene.
Xylene), SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene)
VOCs (TCE)
Status*
Completed;
Operational
from 8/92 to
1/93
Operational;
Although ROD
was signed in
FY91, PRP has
operated the
remedy for
several years
Operational
Operational;
Completion
planned Winter
1997
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
aval table)
Army
(USACE)/DoD
Financed - IRP
Program; Terra
Vac
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Weiss &
Associates
RWQCB; David
Keith Todd
Engineers
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Levine - Fricke
Contacts/Phone
Paul Townsend
(USACE
Sacramento)
916-557-6947
Dan Oburn
(Sacramento
Array Depot)
916-388-4344
Narlin Hezquita
415-744-2393
Darrin
Swartz-Larson
415-744-2233
Kevin Graves
(CA)
510-286-0435
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
Steve Morse
(CA)
510-286-0304
Kevin Graves
(CA)
510-286-0435
Sean Hogan
415-744-2236
Steve Hill (CA)
510-286-4833
A-48
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
9
10
10
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Van Waters and Rogers,
CA (09/30/91)
Watkins- Johnson*, CA
(06/29/90)
Eietson Air Force
Base*, AK (09/29/92)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Conencement Bay/S.
Tacooa Channel/Well
12A*, UA (05/03/85)
Fairchild AFB Priority
1 OU's (OU 1) Craig Rd
Lf., UA (02/13/93)
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Site Description
Chemical packaging
facility
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Tactical air
support
installation
Airplane fueling
and maintenance
Solvent recycler/
paint manufacturer
Landf i 1 1
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
II Treated || II and Treatment II
II 1 || Contractor (if |
II II II available) ||
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (100,000 cy)
to 35 ft deep
Soil (945,700 cy)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA)
VOCs (DCE, TCA,
TCE)
VOCs (JP-4),
SVOCs (petroleum
hydrocarbons.
diesel fuel)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA)
VOCs (TCE)
Operational;
since Fall
1993
Being
installed;
operation
planned Fall
1994
Operational
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1999
In design; 60%
design
completed.
Anticipate
construction
to start by
10/94
PRP lead/State
oversight; Van
Waters and
Rogers
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Watkins
Federal
Facility
lead/DERA
Funded; EA
Engineering
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; AWD
Technologies,
Inc.
Federal
Facility, Air
Force
Lead/Federal
Oversite;
Engineering-Sci
ence. Inc.
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
Susan Gladstone
(CA)
510-286-0840
Kay Lawrence
415-744-2289
Mary Jane
Nearman
206-553-6642
Rielle Markey
(AK)
907-451-2117
Capt. Max Gandy
907-377-4361
Kevin Rochlin
206-553-2106
Cami
G rand i net ti
206-553-8696
A-49
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Fort Lewis Military
Res. Lf 4 & Sol.
Refined Coal, WA
(09/24/93)
See also Soil Washing,
Other Technologies
Spec i f i c
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction with
Air Sparging
Site Description
Military municipal
landfill
Media (Quantity)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
DCE, Vinyl
Chloride)
Status# I Lead Agency
II and Treatment
II Contractor (if
JLavailable)
In design;
Pilot study in
design
Federal
Facility, Army
lead/Federal
Oversight;
USAGE
Contacts/Phone
Rob Kiveit
206-753-9014
A-50
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Washing
June 1994
Region I] Site Name, State,
I (ROD Date)
||
II
2
2
2
2
4
King of Prussia, NJ
(09/28/90)
Myers Property, NJ
(09/28/90)
See also
Dechlorination
Vine I and Chemical, OU
1 and OU 2, NJ
(09/29/89)
See also In situ
Flushing
GE Wiring Devices, PR
(09/30/88)
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Specific II Site Description
Technology 11
|
II
Soil washing
using water with
washing agents
as an additive
Soil washing
coupled with
dechlorination
Soil Washing
Soil washing
using water with
KI2 solution as
an additive.
Soil washing
followed by
bioremediation
of fines
Waste processing
facility
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage
Wiring services
facility
Wood preserving,
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
Treated and Treatment
Contractor (if
II II II available) ||
Soil, Sludge, and
Sediments
combined (19,200
cy)
Soil (48,000 cy).
Sediments (500
cy)
Soil (62,000 cy)
Soil and sludge
combined (5,500
cy)
Soil (6,400 cy)
Metals (Chromium,
Copper, Nickel)
Metals (Cadmium,
Lead, Arsenic,
Copper)
Metals (Arsenic)
Metals (Mercury)
SVOCs (PCP),
PAHs, Metals
(Arsenic,
Chromium)
Completed;
operational
6/93-10/93
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1996
In design;
Design
completion
planned
January 1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Alternative
Remedial
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Metcalf & Eddy
(Design)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ebasco (Design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Morrison
Knudsen
Corporation
(Design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Kim O'Connell
(temporary
contact)
212-264-8127
John Prince
212-264-1213
Matthew
Westgate
212-264-3406
Steve Hadel
(USACE - Kansas
City)
816-426-5221
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
Patsy Goldberg
404-347-6265
A-51
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Washing (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
U
5
5
6
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Whitehouse Waste Oil
Pits (amended ROD)*,
FL (06/16/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC
(06/30/89)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Zanesville Well Field,
OH (09/30/91)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Moss- American*, WI
(09/27/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Arkwood, AR (09/28/90)
Specific
Technology
Soil washing
followed by
bi oremedi at i on
of fines
Soil washing
using water only
may be followed
by s/s
Soil washing ex
situ preceded by
vacuum
extraction (in
situ)
Soil washing
followed by
bioremediation
of fines
Soil washing
followed by
incineration of
residuals
Site Description
Waste oil recycler
Wood preserving
Solvent recovery,
Auto parts
manufacturing
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Status*
Treated I
|| ||
II I!
Soil and Sludge
combined (57,000
cy)
Soil (24,000 cy)
up to 26,000 cy
Soil (1,800 cy)
Soil (80,000 cy)
Soil (20,400 cy).
Sludge (425 cy)
VOCs, PCBs, PAHs,
Metals (lead)
PAHs (Creosote),
Metals (Copper,
Chromium,
Arsenic)
Metals (Lead,
Mercury)
PAHs
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins, PAHs
In design;
Remedy being
reconsidered;
further site
character izati
on is underway
Design
completed but
not installed;
Construction
to begin
Summer 1995
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Spring
1995
Predesign; PD
completion
planned 1995;
Bench -scale
study underway
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1995
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Federal
lead/Fund
F i nanced
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Seacore Science
& Engineering
(Design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Weston,
Inc. (prime
contractor),
Bergmann USA
(subcontractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
McLaren/Hart
(Design)
Contacts/Phone
Tony Best
404-347-6259
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
Dave Wilson
312-886-1476
FTS-886-1476
Russ Hart
312-886-4844
Cynthia Kaleri
214-655-6772
A-52
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Washing (continued)
June 1994
Region
6
6
9
10
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Koppers/Texarkana*, TX
(09/23/88)
See also In situ
Flushing
South Cavalcade
Street*. TX (09/26/88)
See also In situ
Flushing
(Coppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(04/04/90)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Gould, Inc.*, OR
(03/31/88)
Naval Submarine Base,
Bangor Site A, OU 1,
UA (12/06/91)
Specific || Site Description
Technology II
Soil washing
using water with
a surfactant as
an additive.
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Soil washing
followed by s/s
of solid
residuals
Soil Washing
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Battery recycling/
disposal
Federal facility,
ordnance
detonation
Media (Quantity)
Soil (19,400 cy)
Soil (11,000 cy)
Soil (200,000 cy)
Soil (11,000 cy).
Solids (90,000
cy) Battery
casings
Soil (7,100 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Creosote),
Organics (NAPLs),
Metals (Arsenic)
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo( a ) anth racen
e, Chrysene)
SVOCs (PCPs),
Dioxins, PAHs
Metals (Lead)
Ordnance
compounds (TNT,
RDX, DNT)
Status*
In design
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1994
In design;
Remedy being
reconsidered
Operational;
Completion
planned Summer
1995;
Operation
started Fall
1993
Being
installed;
operation
planned to
begin 9/94
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
(Design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonic
Environmental
Federal
Facility, Navy
Lead/Federal
Overs ite; OHM
Remediation
Services Corp.
Contacts/Phone
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6743
Glenn Celerier
214-655-8523
Fred Schauffler
415-744-2359
Chip Humphries
(EPA Oregon
operat.)
503-326-2678
Mike Moran
(Portland
USACE)
503-326-4192
Jeff Rodin
206-553-4497
Chris Drury
(Navy)
206-396-5984
A-53
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Solvent Extraction
June 1994
Region
1
1
4
6
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Norwood PCBs, MA
(09/29/89)
O'Connor*, ME
(09/27/89)
Carolina Transformer,
NC (08/29/91)
United Creosoting*, TX
(09/29/89)
Specific
Technology
Solvent
extraction
Solvent
extraction (may
be followed by
s/s for lead)
Solvent
extraction (may
be followed by
s/s)
Solvent
extraction
(Critical fluid
extraction
followed by
incineration of
fluids)
Site Description Media (Quantity)
II
I
II
PCS capacitor
manufacturing/
testing
Salvage and
electrical
transformer
recycling
Transformer repair
Wood preserving
Soil (50,000 cy),
Sediments (2,000
cy)
Soil and
Sediments
combined (23,500
cy)
Soil (9,000 cy)
Soil (85,000 cy)
with "tar mats"
combined
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs, PAHs
PCBs, PAHs
PCBs
SVOCs (PCP, trace
dioxins/furans).
PAHs
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned
September 1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995
Design
completed but
not installed;
Installation
scheduled for
Sunnier 1995
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
F i nanced
State lead/Fund
Financed; C.F.
Systems
Contacts/Phone
Bob Cianciarulo
617-573-5778
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766
Luis F I ores
404-347-7791
Earl Hendrick
214-655-8519
LaReine Pound
(TX)
512-239-2437
A-54
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption
Juoe 199.4
Region
1
1
1
1
2
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Cannon
Engineer ing/Bridgewate
r, HA (03/31/88)
Re-Solve*, HA
(09/24/87)
McKin*, ME (07/22/85)
Ottati & Goss, NH
(01/16/87)
Industrial Latex, OU
1, MJ (09/30/92)
Specific
Technology
Thermal aeration
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal aeration
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Thermal aeration
Lou temperature
thermal
treatment
Site Description
Chemical waste
storage and
incineration
facility
Chemical
reclamation
facility
Waste
storage/Transfer &
recycle facility.
Drum storage/
disposal
Manufacturing of
chemical adhesives
and natural and
synthetic rubber
compounds
Media (Quantity)
Soil (11,000 cy)
Soil (22,500 cy)
Soil (11,500 cy)
Soil (16,000 cy)
Soi I and
Sediments
combined (34,700
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
Chloride,
Benzene, Toluene)
VOCs, PCBs
VOCs (TCE, BTX)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
DCA, Benzene)
PCBs
Status*
Completed;
Operational
from 5/90 to
10/90
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994
Completed;
Operational
from 7/86 -
2/87
Completed;
Operational
from 6/89 to
9/89
P redesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Chemical Waste
Management ,
Inc.
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonie
Engineering
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Contacts/Phone
Richard
Goehlert
617-573-5742
Joe Lemay
617-573-9622
Sheila Eckman
617-573-5784
Stephen Calder
617-573-9626
Romona Pezzella
212-264-8216
A-55
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 1994
Region
2
2
2
2
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Lipari Landfill Marsh
Sediment*, NJ
(07/11/88)
Meta 1 tec/Aerosystems,
OU 1 - Soil
Treatment*, NJ
(06/30/86)
Reich Farms*, NJ
(09/30/88)
Universal Oil
Products, NJ
(09/30/93)
Specific
Technology
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Thermal
desorption
(vapors will be
captured on
carbon)
Thermal
Desorption
Site Description
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal landfill
Metal
manufacturing
Drum storage/
disposal
Chemical
processing plant
Media (Quantity)
Soil (57,000 cy)
marsh soi I
Soil (9,000 cy)
Soil (8,600 cy)
Soil (23,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Chlorinated
hydrocarbons.
BTEX), SVOCs
(Bis-2-chloroethy
I ether)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
TCA), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
VOCs, PCBs, PAHs
Status*
Being
installed;
Operation to
begin Summer
1994;
completion
scheduled for
late
1994/early
1995
Operational;
Completion
planned
December 1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1995
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
aval I able)
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
Sevens on
Environmental
Services (prime
contractor),
Williams
Environmental
(subcontractor)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; USACE
conducting
design
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
State lead/Fund
Financed
Contacts/Phone
Fred Cataneo
212-264-9542
Courtney
McEnery
212-264-1251
Mark Keast
(USACE, Kansas
City)
816-426-5832
Kim 0' Cornel I
(temporary
contact)
212-264-8127
Rich Puvogel
212-264-9836
Gwen Barunus
(NJ)
609-633-1455
A-56
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 1994
Region
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Waldick Aerospace
Devices (OU 1)*. NJ
(09/29/87)
American Thermostat,
NY (06/29/90)
Claremont Polychemical
- Soil Remedy, NY
(09/28/90)
Fulton Terminals, Soil
Treatment, NY
(09/29/89)
Reynolds Hetals
Company Study Area
Site, (RNC), NY
(09/27/93)
Specific
Technology
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(followed by
off site s/s and
disposal)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal
Desorption
Site Description
Manufacture/
electroplating of
plane parts
Thermostat
manufacturing
Paint/ ink
formation
Former hazardous
waste storage
facility
Active aluminum
production plant
Media (Quantity)
Soil (4,000 cy)
Soil (20,000 cy)
Soil (3,000 cy)
Soil (8,000 cy)
(Depth varies
from 12 to 15
feet).
Sediments (14,500
cy)
Key Contaminants II Status*
Treated
I
(I
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
VOCs (PCE)
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Benzene, Xylene)
PCBs
Completed;
Operational
from 5/93 to
10/93
Operational;
Completion
planned
December 1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned
January 1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned
December 1995
Lead Agency l| Contacts/Phone
and Treatment ||
Contractor (if I
avai lable) ||
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; Rust
Remedial
Services, Inc.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
EBASCO (prime
contractor).
Williams
Environmental
Services
(subcontractor)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; USACE
conducting
design
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
John Prince
212-264-1213
George Buc
(USACE-NY
District)
908-389-3040
Christos
Tsiamis
212-264-5713
Dick Kaplin
212-264-3819
Christos
Tsiamis
212-264-5713
Lisa Carson
212-264-6857
A-57
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 199'
Region
2
2
3
3
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Sarney Farm, NY
(09/27/90)
Solvent Savers, NY
(09/30/90)
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE
Area, OU1*, PA
(06/28/91)
William Dick Lagoons,
OU 3, PA (03/31/93)
Specific
Technology
Thermal
Desorption
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Low temperature
thermal
treatment (may
need s/s for
metals after
thermal
desorption)
Thermal
Desorption
Site Description
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal landfill
Solvent recovery,
Chemical
reclamation
Munitions
manufacturing/
storage. Drum
storage
Wastewater
disposal lagoons
Media (Quantity)
Soil (2,400 cy)
2,000 - 8,000 cy
Soil (60,000 cy)
Soil (15,000 cy)
Soil (24,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Chloroform,
TCE, PCE,
Toluene), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
VOCs (DCE, TCE),
PCBs
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
Ethylbenzene,
Xylene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
MEK), SVOCs
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned early
1995
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned
November 1994;
Site work
began 7/93;
full-scale
clean up
12/93; start
up again in
5/94
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994;
Negotiating
Consent
Decree. PRP
conducting a
treatabi lity
study for SVE
on deep soi I
layer
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment
Contractor (if |
available) |j
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; COM
(Design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed;
McLaren Hart
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Kevin Willis
212-264-8777
Lisa Wong
212-264-9348
Dennis Orenshaw
215-597-7858
Brian Hoke
(Letterkenny)
717-267-8483
Patrick McManus
215-597-8257
A-58
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 1994
Region
3
3
4
4
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Rentokil, VA
<06/22/93)
Saunders Supply Co, OU
1. VA (09/30/91)
See also
Dechlorination
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh
Plant) OU 2, AL
(09/30/91)
See also In situ
Flushing
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh
Plant) OU 4, AL
(07/14/92)
See also In situ
Flushing
Specific
Technology
Thermal
Desorption
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal
Desorption
Site Description
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Agriculture
applications,
Pesticide
manufacturing/use/
storage, Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Agriculture
applications,
Pesticide
manufacturing/use/
storage, Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Media (Quantity)
Soil (13,000 cy)
Soil (25,000 cy)
Soil and sludge
combined (130,000
cy) to 20 ft
depth
Soil and other
waste combined
(17,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins, PAHs
SVOCs (PCP)
VOCs, Biocides
VOCs (Chloroform,
Toluene, Xylene),
Biocides
(Atrazine,
Diazinon,
Prometryn,
Simazine)
Status* Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
II and Treatment I
Contractor (if I
|| available) ||
In design;
Design
completion
planned late
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
1995;
Treatability
studies
planned
P redesign; PD
completion
planned summer
1996;
Treatability
studies
ongoing; final
decision on
technology
will be made
late 1994
P redesign;
Treatability
studies
ongoing; final
decision on
technology
will be made
late 1994
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Charles King
404-347-6262
Charles King
404-347-6262
A-59
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
4
4
4
4
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Smith's Farm Brooks,
OU 1*, KY (09/30/91)
See also
Dechlorination
Aberdeen Pesticide
Dumps, (OU 1 & OU 4),
NC (09/30/91)
Potter's Septic Tank
Service Pits, NC
(08/05/92)
Sangamo/Tuelve-Ni le/Ha
rtwell PCB, OU 1, SC
(12/19/90)
Wamchem*, SC
(06/30/88)
Specific
Technology
Thermal
desorpt i on
Anaerobic low
temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal
Desorption
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal
desorpt ion
(vapors captured
on carbon)
Thermal
desorpt ion using
catalytic
oxidation of
vapor
Site Description
Drum storage/
disposal
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage
Waste petroleum
and septic tank
sludge disposal
pit
Capacitor
manufacturer
Former dye
manufacturing
plant
Media (Quantity)
Soil (18,500 cy)
Soil (124,000 cy)
Soil (10,100 cy).
Sludge (quantity
unknown)
Soi I and Sludge
combined
Soil (2,200 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs, PAHs
(Carcinogenic
PAHs)
Biocides (DDT,
Toxaphene,
Benzene
Nexachloride)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(Carcinogenic
PAHs,
Naphthalene)
PCBs
VOCs (BTX)
Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
|| and Treatment ||
|| Contractor (if ||
|| available) ||
Operational;
Completion
planned
October 1994;
Began
operation in
April 1994
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Spring
1995
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned late
1995
Completed;
operational
during 8/93
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Canon ie (prime
contractor),
Soi I Tech
(subcontractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; Four
Seasons
Tony DeAngelo
404-347-7791
Kay Crane
404-347-7791
Randy HcElveen
(NC)
919-733-2801
Beverly Hudson
404-347-7791
Bernie Hayes
404-347-7791
Richard Haynes
(SC)
803-734-5487
Terry Tanner
404-347-7791
A-60
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 1994
Region
4
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Arlington Blending &
Packaging Co., OU 1*,
TN (06/28/91)
Acme Solvent
Reclaiming, Inc. OU 3
& OU 6, IL (12/31/90)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Outboard
Marine/Uaukegan
Harbor, OU 3*, IL
(03/31/89)
American Chemical
Services*. IN
(09/30/92)
See also Soi I vapor
extraction
Reilly Tar and
Chemical, IN
(09/30/93)
Anderson Development
(ROD Amendment)*, MI
(09/30/91)
Specific Site Description
Technology II
Thermal
desorption,
residual soil
and vapor to be
dechlorinated
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
followed by s/s
for lead
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal
Desorption
Low temperature
thermal
treatment With
off-site
disposal of
residuals
Pesticide
manufacturing/use/
storage. Other
organic chemical
manufacturing
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal water
supply
Marine products
manufacturing
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing.
Solvent recovery
Wood preserving.
Coal tar refinery
and synthethic
chemical plant
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Media (Quantity)
Soil (5,000 cy)
Soil (6,000 cy)
Soi I and
sediments
combined (16,000
cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (10,000 cy)
Soil and sludge
combined (5,100
cy)
Key Contaminants Status* II Lead Agency
Treated and Treatment
II II Contractor (if
|( || available)
VOCs, SVOCs
(PCP), Biocides
(Chlordane,
Heptachlor)
VOCs (TCA, DCE,
OCA, TCE, PCE,
Vinyl chloride.
Benzene, 4-methyl
2 pentanone),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene),
PCBs
PCBs
VOCs, PCBs
VOCs, SVOCs
(PAHs.Pyridine)
Organics (MBOCAs,
4, 4'- Methylene, .
Bis-2-chloroanili
ne)
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994
Completed;
Operational
from 1/92 to
7/92
P redesign;
Schedule
pending
completion of
negotiation
with PRPs
Predesign;
Scheduled to
end Summer
1994
Completed;
Operational
from 9/92 to
6/93
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Harding Lawson
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Soi I tech
In negotiation
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/ Federal
oversight;
West on
Services, Inc
Contacts/Phone
Derek Matory
404-347-7791
Deborah Orr
312-886-7576
Bill Bolen
312-353-6316
Bill Bolen
312-353-6316
Dion Novak
312-886-4737
Jim Hahnenberg
312-353-4213
A-61
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 1994
Region
5
5
5
5
7
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Carter Industries*. MI
(09/18/91)
Due I I -Gardner
Landfill, MI
(09/07/93)
Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI
(09/27/93)
Pristine (ROD
Amendment)*, OH
(03/30/90)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Sherwood Medical, NE
(09/28/93)
Specific
Technology
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(followed by s/s
of soils and
incin. of PCB
oil)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal
Desorption
Thermal
desorption
Anaerobic
thermal
treatment
Thermal
Desorption
Site Description
Scrap metal
salvager
Industrial
landfill.
Municipal landfill
Other inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Industrial waste
treatment facility
Operating
industrial
facility
Media (Quantity)
Soil (20,000 cy)
combi ned
Soil (1,800 cy)
Soil (7,800 cy).
Sediments
(quantity
unknown)
Soil (13,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs
SVOCs
(Bis(2-ethyl
hexyDPhthalate),
Biocides, PCBs
VOCs, Biocides
SVOCs
(Pesticides,
PAHs)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
DCA, Vinyl
Chloride)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
1994;
Installation
planned to
begin Fall
1994
P redesign
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
1995
Completed;
Operational
from 9/93 to
3/94
P redesign
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Connestoga-Rove
rs Associates
State lead/Fund
F i nanced
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; USACE
(design)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed
Contacts/Phone
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Karl a Johnson
312-886-5993
Betty Lavis
312-886-4784
Thomas Alcanna
312-886-7278
Steve
Auchterlonie
913-551-7778
A-62
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption (continued)
June 199.4
Region
8
8
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Martin Marietta
(Denver Aerospace), CO
(09/24/90)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Sand Creek Industrial,
OU 5*. CO (09/28/90)
Harbor Island, WA
(09/30/93)
Specific
Technology
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
(followed by s/s
of soils and
incin. of
vapors)
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Thermal
Desorption
Site Description
Aerospace
equipment
manufacturer -
bulk storage
facility
Pesticide
manufacturing/ use/
storage
General industrial
area
Media (Quantity)
Soil (2,300 cy)
Soil (9,500 cy)
Soil (91,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE), PCBs
Organ ics
(Pesticides)
VOCs (TPH)
Status*
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994
Predesign;
Negotiating
consent decree
agreement with
PRP
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment II
Contractor (if II
available) ||
PRP lead/State
oversight;
under RCRA;
Geraghty &
Miller
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Rust
Remedial
Services
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
George Dancik
303-293-1506
Charles Johnson
(CO)
303-692-3348
Erna Acheson
303-294-1971
Keith Rose
206-553-7721
A-63
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Other
June 1994
Region II Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
1
1
2
3
3
South Municipal Water
Supply Well*, NH
(09/27/89)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Peterson/Puritan Inc.
(OU 1), RI (09/30/93)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Applied Environmental
Services, OU 1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil vapor
extraction
Brodhead Creek, OU 1,
PA (03/29/91)
Brown's Battery
Breaking Site, OU 2,
PA (07/02/92)
See also Other
Techno I go ies
Specific II Site Description
Technology ||
Air sparging
In situ
Oxidation
Air sparging
CROW technology
using hot water
injection to
mobilize coal
tar
Limestone
barrier
Ball bearing
manufacturing
Custom
manufacturing
f aci I i ty
Industrial and
commercial area
Bulk petroleum and
hazardous waste
storage facility,
fuel blending
Coal gasification
Battery recycling/
disposal
Media (Quantity)
Groundviater
Soil (1,000 cy)
Groundwater
Soil (9,000 cy)
25-35 ft deep,
100 ft by 80 ft
Groundwater
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCfr
(PCE.TCA.TCE)
Metals (Arsenic)
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs, PAHs
PAHs
Metals (Lead)
Status* | Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
II and Treatment II
If Contractor (if |J
II available) ||
Installed but
not
operational;
operation to
begin October
1994;
completion
planned 2011
Predesign; EPA
negotiating
with PRP
Design
completed but
not installed
Being
installed;
planned to be
operational
August 1994;
completion
planned
January 1995
Predesign; in
negotiation
--
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Western
Research
Institute
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
-
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
Tom Andrews
(NH)
603-271-2910
Dave Newton
617-573-9612
Leo Hellested
(RI)
401-277-2797
Mel Hauptman
212-264-7681
John Grathwol
(NY)
518-457-9280
John Banks
215-597-8555
Richard Watman
215-597-8996
A-64
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Other (continued)
June 1994
Region
3
3
3
4
5
6
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Broun' s Battery
Breaking Site, OU 2,
PA (07/02/92)
See also Chemical
Treatment
Saegertown Industrial
Area Site, PA
(01/29/93)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Tonolli Corporation,
PA (09/30/92)
Rochester Property, SC
(08/31/93)
Allied Che* & Ironton
Coke, OU 2*, OH
(12/28/90)
See also
Biorewdiation (Ex
Situ), Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Prewitt Abandoned
Refinery, MM
(09/30/92)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ), Soil vapor
extraction
Specific
Technology
Fuming
gasification
Air sparging
Limestone
barrier
Air sparging
Land fanning
magnetically
enhanced
Air sparging
Site Description
Battery recycling/
disposal
Industrial park
(Lord Corp.
property)
Battery recycling/
disposal
Disposal site
Coke manufacturing
Crude oil refinery
Media (Quantity) II Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
| Treated and Treatment
II II || Contractor (if ||
II II II available) ||
Soil and solids
combined (45,000
cy)
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Soil (23,000 cy)
Groundwater
Metals (Lead)
VOCs (PCE, TCA)
Metals (Lead)
VOCs (TCE, bis
(2-ethylhexyl
phthalate))
PAHs
Organics (NAPLs)
Predesign
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1995
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Simmer
1994
Predesign;
Design to be
completed
Winter 1994
In design;
Operations to
begin Spring
1995
Predesign
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
negotiations
underway
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight; IT
Corporation
(Design), Black
& Veetch
(subcontractor)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Richard Watman
215-597-8996
Steve Donohue
215-597-3166
Bob Kimball
(PA)
814-332-6075
Linda Dietz
215-597-6906
Sheri Panabaker
404-347-7791
Tom Alcamo
312-886-7278
Monica
Chapa-Smith
214-655-6780
I
A-65
-------
Table A-1
Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Other (continued)
June 1994
Region
6
9
10
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Pet ro- Chemical
Systems, Inc., OU 2,
TX (09/06/91)
See also Soil vapor
extraction
Hexcel, CA (09/21/93)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil vapor
extraction
Fair-child AFB,
Priority 1 OU's (OU 2)
FT-1, WA (07/14/93)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Fort Lewis Military
Res. Lf 4 & Sol.
Refined Coal, WA
(09/24/93)
See also Soil Washing,
Soil vapor extraction
Specific Site Description
Technology
I!
Air sparging
Air sparging
Air sparging
Air sparging
Petroleum refining
and reuse
Manufacturing
Fire training area
Military municipal
landfill
Media (Quantity)
Groundwater to a
depth of 30 feet
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs
(Naphthalene)
VOCs (PCE,
Acetone, MEK,
Benzene)
VOCs (Benzene)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
DCE, Vinyl
chloride)
Status*
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Summer
1995; pilot
study planned
Fall 1994
Predesign; PD
completion
planned Fall
1994
In design;
Treatabi lity
studies/pilot
test 5/94
In design;
Pilot study in
design
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight
Federal
Facility, Air
Force
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
facility, U.S.
Army
lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/Phone
Chris Villareal
214-655-6758
Mark Johnson
510-286-0305
Carmela
Grandinetti
206-553-8696
Bob Kievit
206-753-9014
A-66
-------
TABLE A-2
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
Table A-2 shows NPL sites at which established treatment technologies have been selected as part of the remedy. Established treatment
technologies include: incineration, solidification/stabilization, and others. The sites are ordered by fiscal year to give some initial
information on the status of implementation: in general, earlier RODs have progressed furthest in design and construction.
A-67
-------
FY
REGION
TABLE A-2
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1994
On-Site Incineration
SITE NAME
STATE
FY
On-Site Incineration (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
STATE
85
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
2
2
5
6
1
4
5
5
5
6
1
1
4
4
5
5
6
6
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
Bog Creek Farm
Bridgeport Rental & Oil
ACME Solvent
MOTCO
Baird & McGuire
Mowbray Engineering
LaSalle Electrical Utilities
Arrowhead Refinery
Fields Brook
Sikes Disposal Pit
Ottati & Goss
Davis Liquid Waste
Tower Chemical
Geiger/C&M Oil
Rose Township Dump
Laskin/Poplar Oil
Bayou Bonfouca
Cleve Reber
Rose Disposal Pit
Lipari Landfill
Love Canal
Delaware Sand & Gravel
Southern Maryland Wood
Treating
Drake Chemical/Phase III
Ordnance Works Disposal
Zellwood Groundwater
LaSalle Electrical Utilities
Fort Wayne Reduction
Forest Waste Products
Pristine
NJ
NJ
IL
TX
MA
AL
IL
MN
OH
TX
NH
RI
FL
SC
MI
OH
LA
LA
MA
NJ
NY
DE
MD
PA
WV
FL
IL
IN
MI
OH
88
88
88
88
88
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
5
6
6
7
8
1
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
1
2
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
7
Summit National Liquid Disposal
Old Midland Products
Brio Refining
Times Beach
Broderick Wood Products
Baird and McGuire
Wells G&H
Bog Creek Farm
De Rewal Chemical*
Douglasville Disposal
Smith's Farm Brooks*
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps/
Fairway
Celanese*
American Creosote Works
Ninth Avenue Dump
New Brighton/ Arden Hills
Big D Campground
Laskin/Poplar Oil
New Bedford*
Sarney Farm
M.W. Manufacturing*
Sangamo/Crab Orchard*
National Wildlife Refuge
Fisher Calo
Bofors Nobel
Springfield Township Dump*
Pristine (Amendment)
University of Minnesota
Vertac
Texarkana Wood Preserving
Missouri Electric Works
OH
AR
TX
MO
CO
MA
MA
NJ
NJ
PA
KY
NC
NC
TN
IN
MN
OH
OH
MA
NY
PA
IL
IN
MI
MI
OH
MN
AR
TX
MO
* Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.
A-68
-------
TABLE A-2 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
93
93
93
On-Site Incineration (continued)
FY
90
90
91
91
91
91
92
92
92
93
93
REGION
7
10
3
3
4
5
4
5
6
3
3
SITE NAME
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial
Park)
FMC Yakima Pit
Whitmoyer Labs, Inc. OU3
Eastern Diversified Metals
Ciba Geigy Corp.
Allied Chem & fronton Coke
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
(Operable Unit 1)
Savanna Army Depot
Gulf Coast Vacuum Services
(Operable Unit 1)
Seagertown Industrial
Mathis Brothers Landfill
STATE
NE
WA
PA
PA
AL
OH
AL
IL
LA
PA
GA
5
6
6
(South Marble Top Road)
MacGillis&Gibbs Bell Lumber MN
&Pole
American Cresote Works LA
(Winnfield Plant)
Vertac AR
Off Site Incineration
FY
84
84
84
REGION
5
5
10
SITE NAME
Berlin & Farro Liquid
Incineration
Laskin/Poplar Oil
Western Processing Phase I
STATE
MI
OH
WA
FY
Off-Site Incineration (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
June 1994
STATE
85
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
89
89
89
2
5
6
8
3
3
5
5
7
2
4
6
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
5
6
7
7
1
1
1
Swope Oil & Chemical
Byron/Johnson Salvage
Yard
Triangle Chemical
Woodbury Chemical
Drake Chemical/Phase II
Westline
Metamora Landfill
Spiegelberg Landfill
Ellisville Area/Bliss
Williams Property
Sodyeco
Sand Springs Petrochemical
Complex
Cannon Engineering/Plymouth
Ewan Property
Reich Farms
Brewster Well Field
Wildcat Landfill
Berks Sand Pit
Douglassville Disposal
Fike Chemical
Belvidere Municipal
Landfill #1
S. Calvacade St.
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek
(R&S)
Syntex
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant)
O'Connor
Pinette's Salvage Yard
NJ
IL
TX
CO
PA
PA
MI
MI
MO
NJ
NC
OK
MA
NJ
NJ
NY
DE
PA
PA
WV
IL
TX
MO
MO
MA
ME
ME
Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.
A-69
-------
TABLE A-2 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1994
FY
Off-Site Incineration (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
STATE
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
91
91
91
91
2
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
8
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
8
8
1
2
2
2
Claremont Polychemical
M.W. Manufacturing
Whitmoyer Laboratories
Newsom Brothers Old Reichold
Cross Brothers Pail
Outboard Marine AVaukegan Harbor
Wedzeb
Cliff/Dow Dump
Alsco Anaconda
United Creosoting
Woodbury Chemical
Beacon Heights Landfill
Kearsarge Metallurgical
FAA Technical Center
Hooker Chemical-Ruco Polymer
Sayreville landfill
Mattiace Petrochemicals
Sealand Restoration
Greenwood Chemical*
Arkwood
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
Hardage/Criner (Amendment)
Fairfield Coal Gasification
Plant
Shenandoah Stables
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace)
Sand Creek Industrial
Ogden Defense Depot
Union Chemical
Curcio Scrap Metal
Swope Oil
Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc.
NY
PA
PA
MS
IL
IL
IN
MI
OH
TX
CO
CT
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
VA
AR
AR
AR
OK
LA
MO
CO
CO
UT
ME
NJ
NJ
NJ
Off-Site Incineration (continued)
FY REGION SITE NAME STATE
91 2 Circuitron NY
91 2 Mattiace Petrochemical NY
91 3 Brodhead Creek PA
91 3 Eastern Diversified Metals PA
91 3 Dixie Cavern County Landfill VA
91 4 Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps
(Amendment) NC
91 4 Wrigley Charcoal TN
91 5 Acme Solvent Reclaiming Inc. IL
91 5 Main Street Wellfield IN
91 5 Thermo Chem MI
91 5 Carter Industries MI
91 5 Summit National Liquid Disposal
Service (Amendment) OH
91 6 Petrochemical (Turtle-Bayou) TX
91 7 Peoples Natural Gas IA
91 7 Ellisville Area Site MO
91 7 Ellisville Area (Amendment) MO
91 7 Kern-Pest Laboratories MO
91 8 Broderick Wood Products CO
91 8 HillAFB UT
91 9 Advanced Micro Devices Inc. CA
91 10 Commencement Bay - Nearshore/
Tideflats WA
91 10 Northwest Transformer - Mission WA
Pole
92 2 Ellis Property NJ
92 3 Fike Chemical WV
92 5 American Chemical Services IN
92 8 Ogden Defense Depot (Operable UT
Unit3)
92 9 Westinghouse Electric (Sunnyvale CA
Plant)
92 10 Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling ID
(Amendment)
* Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.
A-70
-------
FY
92
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
TABLE A-2 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
Off-Site Incineration (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
10
1
3
3
4
6
8
8
8
10
10
U.S. DOE Idaho National
Engineering Lab (Operable Unit 23)
STATE
ID
FY
Off-Site Incineration (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
June 1994
STATE
Davisville Naval Construction RI
Battalion Center
Pinettes Salvage Yard ME
Hunterstown Road PA
Pentokil Virginia Wood Preserving VA
Koppers (Morrisville Plant) NC
Vertac AR
Montana Pole and Treating MT
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU29) CO
Utah Power and Light/American
Barrel UT
Hanford 1100-Area (DOE) WA
Harbor Island-Lead WA
* Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.
A-71
-------
TABLE A-2 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1994
Solidification/Stabilization
FY
82
84
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
88
REGION
3
6
4
4
10
2
3
4
4
5
5
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
6
6
1
SITE NAME
Bruin Lagoon
Bioecology Systems
General Refining
Davie Landfill
Western Processing/Phase II
Marathon Battery
Bruin Lagoon
Pepper's Steel & Alloy
Sapp Battery Salvage
Burrows Sanitation
Forest Waste Products
Davis Liquid Waste
Chemical Control
Myers Property
Waldick Aerospace
Gold Coast
Geiger/C&M Oil
Independent Nail
Palmetto Wood Preserving
Liquid Disposal
Northern Engraving
Gurley Pit
Mid-South Wood
Cleve Reber
Sand Spring Petrochemical
Complex
Charles George Land Reclamation
STATE
PA
TX
GA
FL
WA
NY
PA
FL
FL
MI
MI
RI
NJ
NJ
NJ
FL
SC
SC
SC
MI
WI
AR
AR
LA
OK
MA
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
FY
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
REGION
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
9
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
SITE NAME
Love Canal
Marathon Battery
York Oil
Alladin Plating
Fike Chemical
Brown Wood Preserving
Flowood
Chemtronics
Velsicol Chemical
Mid-State Disposal Landfill
Industrial Waste Control
Bailey Waste Disposal
Brio Refining
French Limited
Midwest Manufacturing/
North Farm
Selma Pressure Treating
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling
Gould
Commencement Bay/NTF
Frontier Hard Chrome
Sullivan's Ledge
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant)
O'Connor
DeRewal Chemical
Marathon Battery
Craig Farm
Douglassville Disposal
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard
Ordnance Works Disposal
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery
Smith Farm Brooks
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
Celanese
Amnicola Dump
STATE
NY
NY
NY
PA
WV
FL
MS
NC
IL
WI
AR
TX
TX
TX
IA
CA
ID
OR
WA
WA
MA
MA
ME
NJ
NY
PA
PA
PA
WV
FL
KY
NC
NC
TN
A-72
-------
TABLE A-2 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
June 1994
FY
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
REGION
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
7
7
SITE NAME
STATE
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
5
5
5
6
6
7
9
9
MIDCO I
MIDCO II
Auto Ion Chemicals
Pesses Chemical
Sheridan Disposal Services
Vogel Paint & Wax
Koppers (Oroville Plant)
Purity Oil Sales
IN
IN
MI
TX
TX
IA
CA
CA
New Bedford MA
Roebling Steel NJ
M.W. Manufacturing PA
C&R Battery VA
Greenwood Chemical VA
62nd Street Dump FL
Cabot/Koppers FL
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving FL
(Amendment)
Kassourf-Kimerling Battery FL
Disposal
Schuylkill Metal FL
Yellow Wate Road FL
Zellwood Groundwater FL
Contamination (Amendment)
Sangamo/Crab Orchard IL
National Wildlife Refuge
Wayne Waste Oil IN
Springfield Township Dump MI
Oconomowoc Electroplating WI
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill AR
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill AR
Shenandoah Stables MO
Hastings Groundwater Contamination NE
(East Industrial Park)
Martin Marietta (Denver CO
Aerospace)
FY
90
90
90
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
STATE
8 Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU 17) CO
9 J.H. Baxter CA
10 Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) OR
Silresin Chemical MA
Sullivan's Ledge MA
Union Chemical MA
Asbestos Dump NJ
Nascolite Corp. NJ
NL Industries NJ
Roebling Steel NJ
Waldick Aerospace Services Inc. NJ
White Chemical Corp. NJ
Halby Chemical DE
Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers MD
Eastern Diversified Metals PA
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard PA
Whitmoyer Lab (OU3) PA
Whitmoyer Lab (OU2) PA
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE PA
First Piedmont Quarry 719 VA
Saunders Supply VA
Interstate Lead Co. AL
USAF Robins Air Force Base GA
Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal KY
Golden Strip Septic Tank SC
Aberdeen Pesticide Dump NC
(Amendment)
Carolina Transformer NC
Arlington Blending and TN
Packaging Co.
Oak Ridge OU3 TN
Wrigley Charcoal TN
Acme Solvents IL
Carter Industries MI
Cimarron Mining Corp. NM
A-73
-------
TABLE A-2 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
FY
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
STATE
91
91
91
91
91
91
7
7
7
8
9
9
IE Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc.
Mid-America Tanning
Shaw Avenue Dump
Anaconda Co. Smelter
FMC (Fresno Plant)
Valley Wood Preserving
IA
IA
IA
MT
CA
CA
PSC Resources MA
Cosden Chemical Coatings NJ
Facet Enterprises NY
Preferred Plating NY
Abex VA
C & D Recycling PA
Fike Chemical WV
Paoli Rail Yard PA
Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump VA
Tonolli PA
Agrico Chemical FL
Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant) AL
Florida Steel FL
JFD Electronics/Channel Masters NC
Marine Corps Logistics Base GA
Savannah River (USDOE) SC
(Operable Unit 1)
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits FL
(Amendment)
Electrovoice MI
H. Brown Company MI
Peerless Plating MI
Savanna Army Depot IL
Spickler Landfill WI
Tar Lake MI
Cal West Metals NM
Double Eagle Refinery OK
Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery OK
FY
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
REGION
6
8
8
8
8
8
9
10
10
10
1
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
SITE NAME
June 1994
STATE
LA
Gulf Coast Vacuum Services
(Operable Unit 1)
Oklahoma Refining OK
Broderick Wood Products CO
Denver Radium (Operable Unit 8) CO
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3)UT
Rocky Flats (USDOE) (Operable CO
Unit 4)
Silver Bow CreekButte Area MT
Rhone-Poulenc/Zoecon CA
Bunker Hill Mining and ID
Metallurgical Complex
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling ID
(Amendment)
U.S. DOE Idaho National
ID
Engineering Lab (Operable Unit 22)
Salem Acres MA
American Cyanamid NJ
FMC-Dublin Road NY
Hunterstown Road PA
Rentokil Virginia Wood Preserving VA
Anodyne FL
Bypass 601 Groundwater NC
Contamination
Bypass 601 Groundwater NC
Contamination (Amendment)
Cedartown Industries GA
Geiger (C&M Oil) (Amendment) SC
Hercules 009 Landfill GA
Kalama Specialty SC
Peak Oil/Bay Drum (Operable Unit 1)FL
Peak Oil/Bay Drum (Operable Unit 3)FL
Reeves Southeastern Galvanizing FL
(Operable Unit 1)
A-74
-------
TABLE A-2 (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
FY
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
FY
85
87
88
88
89
89
90
92
92
92
92
93
REGION SITE NAME STATE
REGION
6
3
3
7
9
9
4
3
6
6
6
4
5 Reilly Tar & Chemical FL
(Indianapolis Plant)
6 Pab Oil & Chemical Services LA
6 Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits MO
(USDOE)
8 Rocky Mountain Arsenal (Operable CO
Unit 28)
8 Utah Power & Light/ American Barrel UT
8 McColl CA
9 Sacramento Army Depot CA
10 American Crossarm & Conduit WA
10 Umatilla Army Depot (Operable Unit 1)OR
Other
SITE NAME STATETECHNOLOGY
Triangle Chemical TX Soil Aeration
West Virginia Ordnance WV In situ Flamming
Bendix Flight System PA Soil Aeration
Arkansas City Dump KS Chemical
Intel, Mountain View CA Soil Aeration
Raytheon, Mountain View CA Soil Aeration
Howe Valley Landfill KY Soil Aeration
Fike Chemical WV Neutralization
Double Eagle Refinery OK Neutralization
Fourth Street Abandoned OK Neutralization
Refinery
Oklahoma Refining OK Neutralization
Kalama Specialty SC Soil Aeration
FY
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
REGION SITE NAME
June 1994
STATE
A-75
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
Appendix B
Innovative Technologies at Superfund Removal Actions
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
TABLE B-l
REMOVAL ACTIONS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table B -1 is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for removal sites for which innovative
treatment technology has been selected. The columns of Table B-l present the following information:
Region
This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located.
Site Name, State, Action Memo Date
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected.
An action memorandum documents the selection of remedy in the removal program. The date shown in this column is the date on which
an action memorandum was signed by an EPA official.
An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example, within the
general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of innovative
technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently selected innovative
technology for wood preserving sites.
Media (quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has been made
to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another parameter significant to the application.
B-l
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There may be other
contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not being addressed by the listed technology,
are not included.
Status
This column indicates the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been
signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the
services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is
in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed,
the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is completely
installed and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document for
that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased.
One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the projects. Whenever
possible, the season and year that the current phase will end is given. This information is identified as the "completion planned" date.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
The "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible parties
will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/construction through
its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) may act for EPA
to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the contractor
responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead agency has selected a
contractor.
Contacts/Phone
This final column provides the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is usually
the EPA on-scene coordinator (OSC) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and phone number
of the state RPM also is provided. Information on any other useful contacts is provided.
B-2
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
June 1994
Region
2
4
5
6
7
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
GCL Tie and Treating,
Iff
Emergency Response
Southeastern Wood
Preserving, MS
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
09/30/90)
See also Soil Washing
Indiana Wood Treating,
IN
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
10/11/92)
HacHillan Ring Free
Oil Cavany*, AR
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
11/09/92)
Scott Lumber, MO
(Action Nemo signed
07/10/87)
Specific
Technology
Composting
Slurry phase
(preceded by
soil washing)
Composting
Solid phase
Land treatment
Site Description
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Wood preserving
Petroleum refining
Wood preserving
Media (Quantity)
Soil (4,800 cy)
Soil (12,000 cy)
Soil (18,000 cy)
Sediments (38,000
cy)
Soil (16,000 cy)
Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
Treated II and Treatment
II || Contractor (if ||
II || available) ||
PAHs (Creosote)
PAHs (Creosote)
PAHs (Creosote)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(DAF Float)
SVOCs (Phenols,
PAHs
Benzo(a)pyrene)
In design;
Pilot study
completed in
Jan 1994
Completed;
September 1994
Operational;
Completion
planned Fall
1994; After 6
months 8 of 9
compost piles
below
treatment
target levels.
Being
installed;
project
completion
date planned
Fall 1995
Completed;
Operational
from 1987 to
Fall 1991
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
ERT/REAC
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; OHM
Remediation
Services Corp
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; IT
Corporation,
CMC, Inc. -
subcontractor
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Reidel
Environmental
Services
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Remediation
Technologies
Joe Cosentino
908-906-6983
Carlos Ramos
212-264-5636
Don Rigger
404-347-3931
Steve Faryan
312-353-9351
Charles Fisher
214-655-2224
Bruce Morrison
913-551-5014
B-3
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Poly-Carb, NV
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
05/14/87)
See also Soil Washing
Spec i f i c
Technology
Land treatment
Site Description jj Media (Quantity) I Key Contaminants
Treated
||
l! II
Commercial waste
management
Soil (1,500 cy)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Cresol)
Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
II and Treatment
|| Contractor (if |
j| available) |j
Completed;
Operational
from 7/87 to
8/88
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed;
Re i del
Environmental
Services
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
B-4
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ)
June 1994
Region
4
6
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
CSX McCormick
Derailment Site, SC
Emergency Response
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Baldwin Waste Oil, TX
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
07/01/92)
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
07/31/84)
See also Chemical
Treatment
Roseville Drums, CA
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
03/03/88)
Specific
Technology
In situ
groundwater
In situ soil
In situ soil
Preceded by
chemical
treatment
In situ soil
Site Description
Derailment (30,000
gallon spill)
Waste oil recycler
Drum storage/
disposal
Midnight dump on
dirt road
Media (Quantity)
Groundwater down
to 40 feet deep
Soil (550 cy)
down to 1 foot
Soil (3,200 cy)
Soil (14 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (BETX)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(TPH)
Biocides
(Toxaphene, Ethyl
and Methyl
Parathion)
SVOCs
(D i ch I orobenzene.
Phenols)
Status* || Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
|| and Treatment ||
|| Contractor (if ||
I) available) ||
Operational
Completed;
September 1994
Completed;
Operational
from 6/85 to
10/85
Completed;
Fall 1988;
Operational
from 2/88 to
11/88
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Kemron
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Ecology &
Envi ronment ,
RSKERL (EPA),
Reidel
Environmental
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Steve Spurlin
404-347-3931
Gary Guerra
214-665-6608
Richard Martin
414-744-2288
Brad Shipley
415-744-2287
B-5
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Chemical Treatment
June 1994
Region I Site Name, State,
I (ROD Date)
2
2
3
5
Vineland Chemical, NJ
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
09/28/92)
Zschiegner Refining
Company, NJ
Emergency Response
Avtex Fibers, VA
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
11/14/89)
PBM Enterprises (Van
Dusen Airport
Service), MI
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
04/10/88)
Specific II Site Description
Technology 11
Chemical
Treatment
Chemical
Treatment
Chemical
Treatment
Oxidation Sodium
Hypochlorite
Pesticide
manuf acturi ng/use/
storage
Precious metal
recovery
Rayon
manufacturing
facility/
uastewater
treatment
Silver recovery
facility
Media (Quantity)
Solids (100 Ib)
Solids (100 Ib)
Sludge (39,000
gi)
Solids Cyanide
tainted X-ray
chips
Key Contaminants
Treated
Metals (Mercury)
Metals (Mercury)
Organics (Carbon
disulfide)
Organic cyanides
Status*
Completed;
December 1992;
This portion
of the site is
completed.
Remedial
action for the
whole site
Mill be done
by April 1994
Completed;
Summer 1993;
Operational
from 2/93 to
6/93. Removal
action
completed.
Other part
going on.
Completed;
August 1991
Completed;
Operational
from 5/85 to
10/85
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Ensco
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Ensco
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OH
Materials
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
American
Environmental
Service, Inc.
Contacts/Phone
Don Graham
908-321-4345
Steve B raw ley
(Ensco)
706-278-1195
Dilshad Perera
908-321-4356
Steve Brawley
(Ensco)
706-278-1195
Vincent Zenone
215-597-3038
Bonnie Gross
215-597-0491
Ross Powers
313-692-7661
B-6
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Chemical Treatment (continued)
June 1994
Region
8
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Mouat Industries*, MT
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
09/20/91 )
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
07/31/84)
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Stanford Pesticide #1,
AZ
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
(04/20/87)
Specific
Technology
Reduction using
su If uric acid
and ferrous
sulfate
Reduction using
sodium hydroxide
In situ
Site Description
Metal ore mining
and smelting
Drum storage/
disposal
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage. Farm
equipment storage
Media (Quantity)
Soil (47,000 cy)
Soil (3,200 cy)
Soil (200 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Metals (Chromium
IV)
Biocides
(Toxaphene, Ethyl
and Methyl
Parathion)
Biocides (Methyl
Parathion)
Status*
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
1994;
Operation
started June
1993
Completed;
Operational
from 4/85 to
10/85
Completed;
Operational
from 7/87 to
9/87
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Baker
Environmental
Federal
lead/ Fund
F i nanced
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Crosby and
Overton
Contacts/Phone
Ron Bert ran
406-449-5720
Richard Martin
414-744-2288
Dan Shane
415-744-2286
B-7
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Dechlorination
June 1994
Region
2
7
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Signo Trading/Mt.
Vernon, NY
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
12/19/86)
Crown Plating, MO
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
08/29/89)
Specific
Technology
Dechlorination
Dechlorination
Site Description
Waste management
facility warehouse
Electroplating
Media (Quantity)
Sludge (15 gl)
Liquid (55 gl)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Dioxins (2,3,7,8
TCDD- laden
herbicides)
Biocides (silvex;
2.4,5 TP)
Status*
Completed;
Completed in
1987
Completed;
Operat i ona I
from 10/89 to
12/89
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Gal son Research
Corp
(subcontractor
to OHM)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Contacts/Phone
Charles
Fitzsimmons
908-321-6608
Mark Roberts
913-236-3881
B-8
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
In situ Vitrification
June 1994
Region
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Parsons Chemical (ETM
Enterprise), MI
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
09/21/90)
Specific
Technology
In situ
Vitrification
Site Description
Agricultural
chemical facility
Media (Quantity)
Soil (3,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Bi oc ides,
Dioxins, Metals
(Mercury)
Status*
Completed;
First
full-scale
application of
in situ
vitrification
at a hazardous
waste site
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Geosafe Corp.
Contacts/Phone
ten Zintak
312-886-4246
B-9
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction
June 1994
Region
4
4
4
8
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Basket Creek Surface
Impoundment*, GA
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
04/11/91)
CSX McCormick
Derailment Site, SC
Emergency Response
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Hinson Chemical, SC
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
11/28/88)
Mystery Bridge
Road/Highway 20, OU
2*, WY
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
See also Other
Technologies
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction ex
situ, used on a
soil pile
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
Extraction
Site Description
Surface
impoundment used
for disposal of
solvents
Derailment (30,000
gallon spill)
Waste reclaiming
facility
Natural gas
compressor station
Media (Quantity)
Soil (2,000 cy)
Soil (200,000 cy)
down to 8 feet
deep
Soil (60,000 cy)
to a depth of 50
feet
Soil (160,000 cy)
approximately 5
acres down to 20
feet
Key Contaminants Status*
Treated
II
(I
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
MEK, MIBK,
Toluene, Xylene,
Benzene)
VOCs (BETX)
VOCs
VOCs (Benzene)
Completed
Completed;
Operation
completed
Winter 1993
Completed;
March 1992;
Operational
from 12/88 to
3/92
Operational
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OHM
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Midwest
Research
Institute
Federal
lead/ Fund
Financed; OH
Materials
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Adrian Brown
Consultants
Contacts/Phone
Don Rigger
404-347-3931
Extn-6140
Steve Spurlin
404-347-3931
Fred Stroud
404-347-3136
Lisa Reed
303-293-1515
B-10
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Washing
June 1994
Region
4
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Southeastern Wood
Preserving, MS
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
09/30/90)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Poly-Carb, NV
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
05/14/87)
See also
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Specific
Technology
Soil washing
(sand removal.
followed by
bioremediation
of fines
Soil Washing
Site Description
Wood preserving
Commercial waste
management
Media (Quantity)
Sludge (quantity
unknown). Solids
(1,000 cy)
Soil (1,500 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs, PAHs
(Creosote)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Cresol)
Status*
Operational;
Completion
planned Spring
1994
Completed;
Operational
7/87 to 8/88
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; OHM
Remediation
Services Corp.
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Reidel
Environmental
Services
Contacts/Phone
Don Rigger
404-347-3931
Bob Handel
415-744-2290
B-ll
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Thermal Desorption
June 1994
Region
4
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
FCX-Washington Site,
NC
Emergency Response
(Action Nemo signed
12/04/91)
Drexler - RANCOR*, WA
Emergency Response
(Action Nemo signed
09/30/91)
Specific
Technology
Thermal
Desorption
Thermal
Desorption
Site Description
Pesticide
manuf actur i ng/use/
storage
Waste oil recycler
Media (Quantity)
Soil (15,000 cy)
Soil (3,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Biocides
(Chlordane,
Methoxyclor, DDT,
DDE)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHS
(Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
Status*
Being
installed
Completed;
Operational
from 7/92 to
8/92
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed
Federal
lead/Fund
Financed; Four
Seasons
Contacts/Phone
Paul Peronard
404-347-6121
Chris Field
206-553-1674
B-12
-------
Table B-1
Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Other
June 1994
Region
8
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Mystery Bridge
Road/Highway 20, OU
2*. WY
Emergency Response
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Specific
Technology
Air sparging
Site Description
Natural gas
compressor station
Media (Quantity)
Soil (160,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Benzene)
Status*
Operational
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP
lead/Federal
oversight;
Adrian Brown
Consultants
Contacts/Phone
Lisa Reed
303-293-1515
B-13
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
Appendix C
Innovative Technologies at Actions Under Other Federal Programs
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
TABLE C-l
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table C-l is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for removal sites for which an
innovative treatment technology has been selected. The columns of Table C-l present the following information:
Region
This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located.
Site Name, State
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected.
An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example,
within the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be
chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of
innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently
selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites.
Media (quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has
been made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another important parameter regarding the
application.
C-l
-------
TABLE C-l (Continued)
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There may be other
contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not being addressed by the listed
technology, are not included.
Status
This column gives the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been
signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the
services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is
in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed,
the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to,set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is
complete and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document
for that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased.
One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the projects. Whenever
possible, the season and year that the current phase will end is given. This information is identified as the "completion planned"
date.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
The "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible
parties will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/
construction through its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) may act for EPA to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency or organization is responsible for managing the
remedy, the contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead
agency has selected a contractor.
Contacts/Phone
This final column gives the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is
usually the project manager or point of contact responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and
C-2
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
June 1994
Region
6
8
9
9
10
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Katagorda Island AF
Range, TX
Former Glasgow AFB, NT
Ft. Ord Marina,
Fritzche AAF Fire
Drill Area, CA
Marine Corps.,
Mountain Warfare
Center, Bridgeport, CA
Ft. Uainwright*, AK
Specific
Technology
Solid phase
Land treatment
Land treatment
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ) Heap
pile bioreactor
with aeration
and irrigation
Land treatment
Biopile
Site Description
Federal facility
UST removal site
Fire drill area
Federal facility
Federal facility.
fuel pipeline.
aboveg round
storage tank
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Status* Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
Treated and Treatment
II Contractor (if
II II II available) ||
Soil (500 cy)
Soil (2,000 cy)
Soil (4,000 cy)
Soil (7,000 cy)
Soil (4,500 cy)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(TPH, Tar)
VOCs, PAHs
(Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
VOCs (TCE, MEK),
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons.
Diesel)
PAHs (Diesel)
Completed;
Operational
from 10/92 to
3/93
Being
installed;
Installation
completion
planned Fall
1994; Design
Completed.
Expected
construction
completion
date Fall 1994
Completed;
Winter 1991
Completed;
1989;
Pilot-scale
project
Operational
Army
(USAGE )/DoD
Financed - IRP
Program; CCC,
Inc.
ARMY
(USAGE )/DoO
Financed FUDS
Program
Army
( USAGE )/DoD
Financed - IRP
Program
State
Lead/Western
Division of
NFEC; ENSR
Army
(USAGE )/DoO
Financed - IRP
Program;
Laidlaw
Jack Otis
409-766-3161
Domingo Galindo
(USACE)
512-884-3385
Martin
Rasmussen
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-3827
Steve Ott
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7670
Gail Youngblood
408-242-8017
Bill Major
805-982-1808
Diane Sober I and
907-271-5083
David Williams
(USACE)
907-753-5657
C-3
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ)
June 1994
Region II Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
4
6
8
9
9
Savannah River DOE, H
Area Settling Basin,
SC
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction, Other
Technologies
Kelly AFB, Site 1100*.
TX
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Ft. Carson*, CO
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Aua Fuel Farm, Aua
Village, American
Samoa,
Davis Nonthan AFB, AZ
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Specific Site Description
Technology
In situ
ground water
In situ soil
Bi oven ting
In situ soil
Bioventing
Bioremediation
(In Situ)
In situ soil
Leaking solvent
line
Federal facility
(hazardous waste
facility)
LIST remediation
Fuel farm
Federal facility
JP-4 Pump House
Media (Quantity)
Groundwater
Soil (8,900 cy)
Soil down to 80
feet
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (440 cy) 400
ft by 15 ft down
to 2 ft deep
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE),
PAHs ((DNAPLs))
VOCs (JP-4)
VOCs (gasoline)
PAHs (Diesel
fuel)
PAHs (Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
Status* I! Lead Agency
II and Treatment
Contractor (if
|j available)
Operational;
Operation
began in 1990
Operational;
Completion
planned 1994;
full scale
since 1993;
completion in
2 years
Operational;
completion
date unknown
Operational;
Completion
expected for
Spring 1996
Completed;
Operational
from 7/91 to
3/92
DOE Lead/DDE
funding;
West i nghouse
Savannah River
Company
Kelly AFB/Air
Force Funded;
SAIC
Army
(USACE)XDoD
Financed - IRP;
Woodward Clyde
Army
(USAGE )/DoO
Financed - FUDS
Program
USACE/Air Force
Contacts/Phone
Nate Ellis
(DOE)
803-952-4846
Brian Lowry
(WSRC)
803-725-5181
Steve Escude
210-925-1812
John Cloonan
(USACE)
719-526-8004
Helene Takemoto
(USACE, pac
div)
808-438-6931 /
1776
Mike
Steffansmeyer
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7163
C-4
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
June 1994
Region II Site Name, State,
|] (ROD Date)
II
9
9
11
Davis Monthan AFB,
Site 35, AZ
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Seal Beach Navy
Weapons Station IR
Site 14, CA
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Naval Communication
Station, Scotland,
Specific
Technology
In situ soil
Bioventing
Anaerobic
In situ soil
Site Description
JP-4 pump house
Federal facility
Naval weapons
station
Diesel fuel
storage tanks and
piping
Media (Quantity)
Soil (63,000 cy)
Soil (1,700 cy)
100 yd diameter
down to 6 feet
deep
Soil apprx. 8,608
square feet (800
sq meters)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (JP-4), PAHs
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(Petroleum
hydrocarbons)
SVOCs (No. 2
Diesel)
Status*
Being
installed;
Pilot test
Winter 1994
Operational;
Operations
started in
1989
Completed;
Fall 1985
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
USAGE/ Air
Force Funded
(State
Overs ite);
Engineering
Science
Navy/DoD
Financed - IRP
Program; Naval
Facility
Engineering
Center
(Stanford
Univ.)
Naval Civil
Engineering
Lab/DoD
Federal;
Polybac
Contacts/Phone
Hike
Steffarmeyer
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7163
Karen Odom
(USAF)
602-750-5595
Doug Dowrey
(ES)
303-831-8100
Laura Duchnak
(Navy RPM)
619-532-3152
Steve McDonald
(Navy)
310-594-7655
Deh Bin Chan
805-982-4191
C-5
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Oechiorination
June 1994
Region
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
U. S. Public Works
Center, Guam, GU
Specific
Technology
Dechlorination
Site Description
Federal facility
Media (Quantity)
Soil (5,500 cy)
tons
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs
Status*
Operational;
Completion
planned Summer
1995
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Navy; Guam EPA
Overs ite; IT
Corp
Contacts/Phone
D. B. Chan
(Navy)
805-982-4191
C-6
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction
June 1994
Region
3
4
6
6
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Langley AFB, IRP Site
28, VA
Savannah River DOE, M
Area Settling Basin,
SC
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Other
Technologies
Hoi loman AFB, BX
Service Station, NM
Hoi loman AFB, Main POL
Area, NM
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
with groundwater
sparging
Soil vapor
extraction may
supplement with
air injection
Soil vapor
extraction Using
passive vent and
extraction
wells.
Site Description
Federal facility
Leaking solvent
line
Service station
(SS - 17)
Former above
ground fuel
storage tank area
(JP-4 and AV Gas
spill) (SS-02/05)
Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants
II Treated
||
II
Soi I 1.5 acres
down to 5 feet
deep
Soil (450,000
Ib), Groundwater
down to 200 feet
Soi I 2 to 3 acres
down to 10 feet
Soil (quantity
unknown)
VOCs (Gasoline)
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
Status*
Being
instal led;
Installation
completion
planned Summer
1994
Operational;
Operation of
the SVE system
began in 1990
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
1993;
Currently
conducting
pilot test.
In design;
Design
completed;
Installation
and remedation
to start in
Spring 1994.
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
USACE/Air Force
Funded
DOE Lead/DOE
Funding;
Westinghouse
Savannah River
Company
USACE/Air Force
IRP Program;
Ensearch
Envi ronmenta I ,
Walk Haydel &
Associates -
Sub
USACE/Air Force
IRP Program; IT
Contacts/Phone
John Farhat
(USACE, Omaha)
402-221-7654
Dan Musel
(Langley AFB)
804-764-3987
Nate Ellis
(DOE)
803-952-4846
Brian Looney
(WSRC)
803-725-5181
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
C-1
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
6
8
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Kelly AFB, Site 1100*,
TX
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Ft. Carson*. CO
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Davis Monthan AFB, AZ
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Davis Monthan AFB,
Site 35, AZ
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Specific
Technology
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with
bi event ing
Soi I vapor
extraction with
bi eventing
Site Description
Federal facility
(hazardous waste
facility)
UST remediation
Federal facility
JP-4 Pump House
JP-4 pump house
Media (Quantity)
Soil (8,900 cy)
Soil down to 80
feet
Soil (63,000 cy)
Soil (63,000 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (JP-4)
VOCs (gasoline)
VOCs (JP-4,
Benzene)
VOCs (JP-4,
Benzene)
Status*
Operational;
Vacuum
extraction
done before
with
bi eventing,
information
the same.
Completion in
2 years.
Operational;
completion
date unknown
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993;
Completion
delayed
because
awaiting
funding
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
1993
Lead Agency II Contacts/Phone
and Treatment II
Contractor (if II
available) |j
Kelly AFB/Air
Force Funded;
SAIC
Army
(USAGE )/DoD
Financed - IRP;
Woodward Clyde
USACE/Air Force
Funded;
Montgomery
Watson - Design
Contractor
USACE/Air Force
Funded;
Montgomery
Watson - Design
Contractor
Steve Escude
210-925-1812
John Cloonan
719-526-8004
Mike
Steffansmeier,
USAGE Omaha
402-221-7163
Karen Odom Air
Force
602-750-5595
Mike
Steffansmeier
(USAGE, Omaha)
402-221-7163
C-8
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
June 1994
Region
9
9
9
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Luke AFB, AZ
HcClellan AFB OUD, CA
Seal Beach Navy
Weapons Station IR
Site 14, CA
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing and
thermal
oxidation of off
gases
Soi I Vapor
Extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
combustion of
air emissions
Site Description II Media (Quantity)
II
II
Air Force fire
training pits
Former fuel and
solvent disposal
site
Federal facility
Naval weapons
station
Soil (35,000 cy)
Soil (12,000 cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (2-hexanone,
2-butanone,
4 -methyl
2-pentanone,
BTEX)
VOCs (TCA, TCE,
1-1-DCE)
VOCs (BTEX)
Status*
Completed;
Operational
from 11/91 to
5/92. Will
conduct
long-term
monitoring
afterward
Operational;
Completion
planned Winter
1994; 5 years
to complete.
In design;
Operation to
start in 1994
Lead Agency Contacts/Phone
and Treatment II
Contractor (if II
available) ||
USAGE
Lead/State
Oversight;
Envi rocon
Air Force; CH2M
Hill
Navy/DoD
Financed - IRP
Program; Jacobs
Engineering
Jerome
Stol insky
(USAGE)
402-221-7170
Dan McCafferty
(Envi roc on)
406-523-1150
Steve Hodge
(McClellan AFB)
916-643-0830
Elaine Anderson
(McClellan AFB)
916-643-0830
Joseph Danko
(CH2M Hill)
503-752-4271
Jeff Kidwell
(Mavy)
619-532-2058
Steve McDonald
(Mavy)
310-594-7655
C-9
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Soil Washing
June 1994
Region
5
5
Site Name, State,
(ROD Date)
Saginaw Bay Confined
Disposal Facility, MI
Twin Cities Army
Ammunition Plant, MN
Specific
Technology
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Site Description
Confined disposal
island
Munitions
manufacturing/
storage
Media (Quantity)
Sediments (150
cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs
Metals (Lead,
Mercury)
Status*
Completed;
Summer 92
Operational;
Completion
planned Summer
1994
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
COE
lead/Federal
Oversite;
Bergmann, USA
Federal
Facility/State
oversight;
Wenck
Associates,
Inc.
Contacts/Phone
Jim Galloway
(COE)
313-226-6760
Rick T raver
(Bergmann)
203-684-6844
Peter Rissel
(US Army Env.
Center)
410-671-1504
Martin McCleery
(Twin Cities
AAP)
C-10
-------
Table C-1
Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993
Other
June 1994
Region Site Name. State,
(ROD Date)
Savannah River DOE,
Area Seti
SC
See also
Bioremediation (In
Situ), Soil Vapor
Extraction
=====
ite.
=====
DOE, M
Basin,
i (In
apor
=====
Specific
Technology
air sparging
r
Site Description
:=============.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Leaking solvent
line
Media (Quantity)
^^_^_^___^^_^_
Groundwater
Key Contaminants
Treated
============
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
=====
Status*
=========
Operational;
Operational
since 1990
r
Lead Agency
and Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
=========
DOE lead/DOE
funding;
Westinghouse
Savannah River
Company
Contacts/Phone
==========
Nate Ellis
(DOE)
803-952-4846
Brian Loury
(WSRC)
803-725-5181
^ P.^^^^
C-ll
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
Appendix D
Summary of Status Report Updates, Changes, Deletions
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
Summary of Updates/Changes/Deletions
Each edition of this report has added new information on the applications of innovative technologies at Superfund sites and has updated the status of
existing innovative projects. The information added from ROD'S from previous fiscal years that was deleted, or changed in each edition (from the
first edition of the report published in January 1991 through this 5th edition) is described below to allow tracking of specific projects from edition to
edition.
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 1st edition report (January 1991) to the 2nd edition report (September 1991).
Region
3
3
2
1
2
6
10
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Leetown Pesticides, WV (03/31/86)
Harvey-Knott Drum, DE (09/30/85)
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
(09/29/89)
Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87)
GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)
Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers,
TX (03/25/88)
Northwest Transformer, WA
(09/15/89)
Technology (Listed
in 1st Edition)
Bioremediation
In Situ Soil Flushing
Thermal Desorption
Chemical Treatment
Chemical Extraction
Chemical Treatment
In Situ Vitrification
2nd Edition
Added
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes (changed
to soil vapor
extraction in
3rd edition)
Yes
Changed to
Dechlorination
Soil Washing
Dechlorination
Comments
No further action. Risk re-
evaluated and was determined that
risk was not sufficient for remedial
action.
During remedial design, sampling
indicated VOCs were no longer
present in the soils. Heavy metals
remained at the surface. An BSD
was issued on 12/92. Remedy will
consist of capping the site.
Misinterpretation of ROD during
ROD analysis
Reclassified technology
Reclassified technology
Reclassified technology
Technology dropped because
commercial availability was
delayed
Contacts/Phone
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Philip Rotstein
215-597-9023
Kate Lose
215-597-0910
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
Lorenzo Thantu
617-223-5500
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
John Meyer
214-655-6735
Christine Psyk
206-553-6519
Note: The 2nd edition report also added information on 45 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1990 RODs and
18 innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions.
D-l
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 2nd edition report (September 1991) to the 3rd edition report (April 1992).
Region
2
2
2
4
5
5
5
6
6
9
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Marathon Battery, NY (09/30/88)
Goose Farm, NJ (09/27/85)
GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving,
FL (09/26/90)
Sangamo/Crab Orchard National
Wildlife Refuge, IL (08/01/90)
Anderson Development, MI
(09/28/90)
U.S. Aviex, MI (09/07/88)
Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM
(09/23/88)
Crystal Chemical, TX (09/27/90)
Solvent Service, CA (09/27/90)
Technology (Listed
in 2nd Edition)
Thermal Desorption
In Situ Soil Flushing
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
In Situ Vitrification
In Situ Vitrification
hi Situ Flushing
Bioremediation
(ex situ)
hi Situ Vitrification
Bioremediation
(in situ)
3rd Edition
Added
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Thermal
Desorption
Incineration
Thermal
Desorption
Comments
During design soil gas
concentration at hot spots was
below NY state standards. GW
monitoring will continue.
Incorrectly classified. Actually
conducting pump and treat with
treated water being reinjected
Possible pre-wash of debris with
surfactants
Problems due to the presence of
furans. Incineration likely
ROD specified the remedy as in
situ vitrification or incineration.
Incineration was chosen
Because of concern by the
community the remedy was
changed. ROD amendment signed
9/30/91, and BSD was signed
10/2/92
Cleanup levels reached by natural
attenuation
Remedy reconsidered after delay in
commercial availability of
technology. Vitrification
considered for hot spots only.
Revised remedy will consist of
capping and off-site disposal/con-
solidation of soils.
ROD was misinterpreted during
ROD analysis
Contacts/Phone
Pam Tames
212-264-1036
Laura Lombardo
212-264-6989
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
Tony Best
404-347-2643
Nan Gowda
312-353-9236
Jim Hahnenberg
312-353-4213
Robert Whippo
312-886-4759
Ky Nichols
214-655-6783
Lisa Price
214-655-6735
Kevin Graves
510-286-0435
Steve Morse (CA)
570-286-0304
Note: The 3rd edition report also added information on 70 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1991 RODs.
D-2
-------
Region
9
Site Name, State
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 3rd edition report (April 1992) to the 4th edition report (October 1992).
Regfea
2
2
5
6
6
9
9
10
Site Name, State (ROB Date)
Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment, NJ
(07/11/88)
GE Wiring Services PR (09/30/88)
University of Minnesota, MN
(06/11/90)
Sol Lynn/Industrial Dechlorination
Transformers, TX (03/25/88)
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(09/23/88)
Poly Carb, NV (Removal)
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
(03/22/91)
Gould Battery (03/31/88)
Tectaology (Listed
in 3rd Edition)
None
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Dechlorination
Soil Washing
Bioremediation
(in situ)
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil Washing
4th Edition
Added
Thermal
Desorption
hi Situ
Flushing
Soil Washing
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Soil Washing
Incineration
in 5th edition
Bioremediation
(ex situ)
Comments
Missed during original ROD
analysis
Issued an ESD in August 1991 to
change remedy to Thermal
Desorption or Incineration.
Incineration was chosen because it
was less expensive
Discontinued due to
implementation difficulties
Remedy added by ROD
amendment
Reclassified technology
Mistakenly deleted from report
Missed during original ROD
analysis
Contaets/Phoae
Tom Graff
816-426-2296
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
Barrel Owens
312-886-7089
John Meyer
214-655-6735
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6735
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
SeanHogan
415-744-2233
Chip Humphries
503-326-2678
Note: The 4th edition report also added information on 10 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action in FY 1992 RODs, and 21
innovative treatment technologies at non-Superfund sites.
D-4
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993).
Region
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87)
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(05/30/89)
Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 1,
NJ (02/04/91)
Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 2,
NJ (02/04/91)
Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 4,
NJ (02/04/91)
CaWwell Trucking, NJ (09/25/86)
Tobylanna Army Depot, PA
(Non-Superfund project)
Technology Listed
in 4th Edition
Dechlorination
Solvent Extraction
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation
(in situ)
5th Edition
Added
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Comments
Pilot study showed that
dechlorination increased the
volume and that the waste still
needed to be incinerated. An ESD
to incinerate residuals off-site is in
peer review.
Will incinerate off-site
Remedy involves pump and treat
with on-site discharge. Soil is not
being targeted.
Remedy involves pump and treat
with on-site discharge. Soil is not
being targeted.
Remedy involves pump and treat
with on-site discharge. Soil is not
being targeted.
Thermal desorption not needed
because highly contaminated soil
will be incinerated off-site instead.
Remainder will be stabilized. ESD
issued.
Will conduct ex situ passive
volatilization
Coatacts/Phoae
Joe Lemay
617-573-9622
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
EdFinnerty
212-264-3555
Drew Lausch
215-597-3161
Ross Mantkrae
(Tobyhanna)
717-894-6494
Note: The 5th edition report also adds information on 49 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1992 RODs, and 15
innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions.
D-5
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
Region
4
4
4
4
5
6
7
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Smith's Farm Brooks
(09/30/91)
American Creosote Works, FL
(09/28/89)
American Creosote Works, FL
(09/28/89)
Hollingsworth Solderless, FL
(04/10/86)
Cliffs/Dow Dump, MI (09/27/89)
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK
(09/27/90)
Fairfield Coal & Gas, IA (09/21/90)
Technology Listed
in 4th Edition
Dechlorination
Soil Washing
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
None
Bioremediation (In
Situ)
Dechlorination
Bioremediation (in
situ)
Sth Edition
Added
Thermal
Desorption
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Comments
Will alter chemistry to achieve
dechlorination during thermal
desorption.
Bench-scale study of soil washing
showed that the concentrations of
carcinogenic PAHs were not
adequately reduced. Also
discovered dioxins at much higher
concentrations
Bench-scale study of
bioremediation (ex situ) showed
that the concentrations of
carcinogenic PAHs were not
adequately reduced. Also
discovered dioxins at much higher
concentrations
Listed as soil aeration in 3rd
edition
Bioremediation (in situ) was a
misinterpretation of the ROD. All
soil will be excavated and treated
by bioremediation (ex situ).
Remedy has been suspended
because of implementation
difficulties and escalating cost.
Cost doubled from cost projected
in ROD. Issuing ROD amendment
to cap in place.
Pilot study showed in situ
bioremediation was too costly. It
appears that the present pump and
treat system will be able to achieve
cleanup levels.
Contacts/Phone
Tony DeAngelo
404-347-7791
Mark Fite
404-347-2643
Mark Fite
404-347-2643
John Zimmerman
404-347-2643
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
Mike Overbay
214-655-8512
Bruce Morrison
913-551-7755
D-6
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
Region
8
9
9
9
10
10
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Sand Creek Industrial OU 5, CO
(09/28/90)
Koppers Company (Oroville), CA
(04/04/90)
Signetics (AMD 901) TRW OU, CA
(09/11/91)
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
(09/30/91)
IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID
(12/05/91)
IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID
(12/05/93)
Technology Listed
in 4th Edition
Soil Washing
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
None
None
Acid Extraction
Soil Washing
5th Edition
Added
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Thermal
Desorption
Comments
Soil washing did not meet
performance standards and was
expensive. ROD amendment issued
early September 1993.
Misinterpretation of ROD during
ROD analysis
Remedy added
Dropped by mistake from 4th
edition
Treatability study of acid extraction
did not achieve good extraction
rates. Did not reduce the volume
of waste. Will excavate,
consolidate and cap.
Treatability study of soil washing
did not achieve results. Did not
reduce the volume of waste. Will
excavate, consolidate and cap.
Contacts/Phone
Erna Acheson
303-294-1971
Fred Schlauffler
415-744-2365
Joe Healy
415-744-2331
Kevin Graves
(CA)
510-286-0435
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
Linda Meyer
206-553-6636
Nolan Jenson
(DOE)
208-526-0436
Linda Meyer
206-553-6636
Nolan Jenson
(DOE)
208-526-0436
D-7
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994).
Region
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
Site Name, State (ROB Bate)
Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME
(12/27/90)
Tibbetts Road, NH (09/29/92)
Ewan Property, OU2, NJ (09/29/89)
Naval Air Engineering Center,
OU 7, Interim Action, NJ (03/16/92)
Solvent Savers, NY (09/30/90)
U.S. Titanium, VA (11/21/89)
L.A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils),
VA (03/31/88)
Technology Listed
in 5th Edition
Thermal Desorption
In Situ
Soil Flushing
Soil Washing,
Solvent Extraction
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor
Extraction
In Situ Flushing
Bioremediation
(In Situ)
6th Edition
Added
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Neutralization
with lime
(Ex Situ)
Comments
Determined that SVE would be
more cost effective. BSD signed
March/April 1994.
Misinterpretation of ROD during
ROD analysis. Soil was not
targeted for treatment.
Re-evaluation of site found
significantly less contaminated
soil than original estimates. Soil
will be disposed off site. BSD
signed July 1994.
Misinterpretation of the ROD
during ROD analysis.
SVE is a secondary remedy which
may be used instead of thermal
desorption, the primary remedy,
if treatability studies show to be
effective.
Treatability studies indicated that
the technology was not feasible.
BSD under preparation.
Facility no longer in operation.
Can now excavate. Remedies
being considered include thermal
desorption.
Contacts/Phone
Terry Connelly
617-573-9638
Christopher Rushton
(ME DEP)
207-287-2651
Darryl Luce
617-573-5767
Mike Robinette (NH)
603-271-2014
Kim O'Connell
212-264-8127
(temporary)
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
Robert Wing
212-264-8670
Lisa Wong
212-264-9348
Vance Evans
215-597-8485
Jeff Howard (VA)
804-762-4203
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Note: The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs.
D-8
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
Region
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
L.A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils),
VA (03/31/88)
L.A. Clarke & Sons,
Lagoon Sludge OU, VA (03/31/88)
Henderson Road, PA (06/30/88)
Cabot Carbon/Koppers
(Groundwater), PL (09/27/90)
Benfield Industries, NC (07/31/92)
Charles Macon Lagoon,
Lagoon #10, NC (09/3 1/91)
Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC
(09/30/87)
Arlington Blending & Packaging
Co., OU1.TN (06/28/91)
Technology Listed
in 5th Edition
In Situ Flushing
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Bioremediation
(In Situ
Groundwater)
Soil Washing
Bioremediation
Slurry phase
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Chemical Treatment
Dechlorination
6th Edition
Added
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Re-use as fuel
off-site
Land
Treatment
Comments
Facility no longer hi operation.
Can now excavate. Remedies
being considered include thermal
desorption.
Technology changed because of
uncertainty about the ability of
bioremediation to reach treatment
goals. BSD signed 3/94.
Only conducted air injection to
facilitate pump and treat. Vapors
were not extracted. Further
investigation revealed that the
Vadose Zone was not an area of
concern.
Groundwater not being treated.
Only soil is being treated.
Land treatment determined to be
more cost effective.
Treatability study indicated that
die technology could not treat the
contaminants of concern because
of materials problems. Will
excavate and dispose off-site.
ROD Amendment signed 3/94.
Waste will be disposed off-site
more cost effectively
Another disposal method likely to
be used.
Contacts/Phone
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
Joe McDowell
215-597-8240
Patsy Goldberg
404-347-6265
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
Geizelle Bennett
404-347-7791
David Lown (NC)
919-733-2801
Al Cherry
(404) 342-7791
Derek Matory
404-347-7791
Note: The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs.
D-9
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
Region
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
Site Name, State (ROD Bate)
South Andover Salvage Yard, OU 2,
MN (12/24/91)
Allied Chem & fronton Coke, OU 2,
OH (12/28/90)
Allied Chem & fronton Coke, OU 2,
OH (12/28/90)
United Scrap Lead/SIA, OH
(09/30/88)
MacGillis and Gibbs Co. /Bell
Lumber and Pole Co., MN
(12/31/92)
Fruitland Drum, NM (09/08/90)
Holloman AFB, Main POL Area,
NM
Technology Listed
: in 5th Edition
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Bioremediation
(In Sim)
Soil Washing
Soil Washing and
Bioremediation (ex
situ) of fines
Dechlorination
Bioremediation
(In Situ)
(Groundwater)
6th Edition
Added
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ) (Land
Fanning)
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
Magnetically
Enhanced Land
Fanning
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Thermal
Treatment
Incineration
on-site
Incineration
(Off-site)
Comments
Technology changed to off-site
thermal treatment (either thermal
desorption or incineration)
because of reduced volume of
contamination found during RD
investigations. ROD amendment
signed 5/31/94.
Adding technology to treat more
highly contaminated soil.
Adding technology to treat more
highly contaminated soil.
Determined to be too expensive.
Other alternatives being
evaluated. ROD Amendment
planned.
Incineration was contingency
remedy in ROD. State had
concerns about effective means of
soil washing and cost of
incineration has decreased; ESD
will be signed Fall 1994.
Dechlorination not being pursued
because of cost considerations.
Groundwater remediation not
planned for this area.
Contacts/Phone
Bruce Sypniewski
312-886-6189
Tom Alcamo
312-886-7278
Tom Alcamo
312-886-7278
Anita Boseman
312-886-6941
Timothy Hull (OH)
513-285-6357
Daryl Owens
312-886-7089
Gregory Fife
214-655-6773
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
Note: The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs.
D-10
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
Region
6
6
6
8
8
9
9
9
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
Holloman AFB, Main POL Area,
NM
South Valley, NM (09/30/88)
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek Bldg.
3001), OK (08/16/90)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, M-l
Basins (OU 16), CO (02/26/90)
Portland Cement Co. (Kiln Dust No.
2 and No. 3) OU2, UT (03/31/92)
Mesa Area Ground Water
Contamination, AZ (09/27/91)
Castle Air Force Base, OU 1, CA
(09/30/91)
Teledyne Semi Conductors, CA
(03/22/91)
Technology Listed
in 5th Edition
Air Sparging
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil Vapor
Extraction
In Situ
Vitrification
Chemical Treatment
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Bioremediation
(In Situ
Groundwater)
Soil Vapor
Extraction
6th Edition
Added
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Pump and
Treat with Air
Stripping
Comments
Groundwater remediation not
planned for this area.
Determined there was
insignificant concentration to
warrant remediation. No further
action.
Determined that SVE was not
viable. No alternative selected at
this point.
Remedy cancelled due to
problems with contractor. New
ROD being negotiated.
Not considered innovative
Removed from NPL, deferred to
the State
Bench-scale test indicated that the
technology did not work. No
ESD or ROD amendment being
issued.
Misintrepretation of the ROD.
SVE intended only for Spectra
Physics, the adjacent site.
Contacts/Phone
Ron Stirling
(USACE)
402-221-7664
Bert Gorrod
214-655-6779
Susan Webster
214-655-6784
Major Richard
Ashworth (USAF)
405-734-3058
Connally Mears
303-293-1528
Mike McCeney
303 293-1526
Maurice Chait
602-962-2187
Richard Oln
602-207-4176
David Roberts
415-744-1487
Brad Hicks (USAF)
209-726-4841
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
Carla Dube
510-286-1041
Note: The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs.
D-ll
-------
Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
Region
9
9
9
10
Site Name, State (ROD Date)
FMC (Fresno), CA (06/28/91)
Signetics (Advanced Micro Devices
901), CA (09/1 1/91)
Sacramento Army Depot, Oxidation
Lagoons OU, CA (09/30/92)
McChord AFB Washrack Treatment
Area, AK (09/28/92)
Technology Listed
in 5th Edition
Soil Washing
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Soil Washing
Bioremediation
(Ex Situ)
6th Edition
Added
Deleted
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Changed to
Comments
Soil washing did not work
because the soil had too many
fines. Looking at thermal
desorption and solidification/
stabilization as possible remedies.
Combined ROD for Signetics,
AMD 901/902 and TRW
Microwave site. SVE is not
being done at me TRW OU.
Misinterpretation of ROD.
Technology canceled due to cost.
Looking at solidification as an
alternative.
Additional studies showed
treatment not needed.
Contacts/Phone
Tom Dunkelman
415-744-2287
Mike Pfister (CA)
209-297-3934
Darrin Swartz-Larson
415-744-2233
Kevin Graves (CA)
510-286-0435
Marlin Mezquita
415-744-2393
George Siller
(USACE)
916-557-7418
Dan Oburn
(Sacramento Army
Depot)
916-388^344
Marie Jennings
206-553-1173
Note: The 6th edition report also adds information on S3 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions hi FY 1993 RODs.
D-12
-------
Appendix £
Completed Innovative Projects and Treatment Trains
-------
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
TABLE E-l
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Table E-l provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment
technologies that have been completed at remedial sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace, the information included in table
A-l.
E-l
(05)28-708/0473803/ASR 6th Ed/Ch.1/ki/dc/ki/9-15-94
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
June 1994
III) III III III III III
III III III III III MateMals III
Site Name, State, Dates II Technology/ III Media Treated III Key Contaminants III Operating 1 1 Handling III Residuals
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required ||| Management
1
1
Cannon Engineering/HA
5/90 to 10/90
McKin, ME
7/86 to 4/87
Thermal
desorption/
Canonie
Environmental
Services Corp.,
Porter, IN
Thermal
desorption/
Canonie Env.
Services Corp.,
Porter, IN
Soil
(11,300 tons)
Soil
(11,500 cy to a
depth of 10 ft.)
TCE, DCE, PCE, BTEX,
vinyl chloride.
chlorobenzene, SVOCs
Criteria:
0.1 ppm - TCE, DCE,
PCE, chlorobenzene
0.2 ppm - Toluene,
Total Xylenes
0.05 ppm - Vinyl
chloride
SVOCs - 3 ppm
Benzene - 0.1 ppm
Input 500 - 3,000
ppm (Total VOCs)
Output - <0.025 ppm
(Total VOCs)
BTEX, PAHs, TCE
Criteria:
0.1 ppm TCE averaged
over batch treatment
volume
1.0 ppm per
individual aromatic
organic compound,
and PAHs
10.0 ppm for total
PAH constituents
Input: Up to 3,310
ppm TCE
Output: Less than
0.1 ppm TCE
Continuous
operation
40 tons/hr
450 - 500° F
Moisture content
before treatment -
5X - 25X moisture
Additives - dry
soil (to reduce
moisture content)
Batch process: 8-9
cy/batch
Residence time:
2 minutes/pass,
3 passes per
batch
250-400°F soil
exit temperature
Excavation
Screening
Mixing
Dewatering
Excavation
Screening
Mixing
Exhaust gas
treated with
baghouse,
scrubber, and
carbon
adsorpt i on
Scrubber water
was treated
with carbon
adsorption
Exhaust gas
treated with
baghouse.
scrubber, and
carbon
adsorption
Scrubber water
was treated
with carbon
adsorption
Residual solids
deposited on-
site.
HEPA filters,
baghouse bags.
and PPE
incinerated
off-site
Comments
The waste feed size
limitation for the
equipment, 1.875
inches, was an
important
consideration.
More information is
available in the RA
report available from
Region 1.
Newly added or completed projects
E-2
-------
TABLE El
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
Region
1
2#
2#
2#
II HI Materials 1 1
Technology/ III Media Treated III Key Contaminants III Operating Handling (Residuals III
Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required ||| Management ||| Conroents
Ottati & Goss, NH
6/89 to 9/89
King of Prussia, NJ
6/93 - 10/93
SMS Instruments/
Deer Park, NY
4/92 to 12/93
Waldick Aerospace
Devices (OU 1), NJ
5/93 to 10/93
Thermal
desorption/
Canon ie
Environmental
Services Corp.,
Porter, IN
Soil Washing
using water and
proprietary
additive
Alternative
Remedial
Technologies,
Inc.
Soil Vapor
Extraction/
Four Seasons
Environmental,
Inc.
Greensboro, NC
Low temperature
thermal
treatment
Rust Remedial
Services, Inc.,
SC
Soil (5,100 cy)
Soil, sludge.
and sediments
(19,200 tons)
Soil (1,250 cy)
Soil (4,000 cy)
TCE, PCE, DCA, BTEX,
TCA
Criteria:
1 ppm - Total VOCs
0.1 ppm DCA,
benzene, TCE, PCE
Input: Up to 460 ppm
TCE, 1200 ppm PCE
Output: Less than
0.025 ppm TCE, PCE
Metals (Chromium,
Copper, Nickel)
Criteria:
11 metal -specific
cleanup levels based
on risk of exposure
VOCs, SVOCs
Criteria:
Levels specified for
nine VOCs and nine
SVOCs, ranging from
500 to 4,500 jig/kg
Input: >1,000 ppm
total VOCs
Output: All soil
samples met criteria
Criteria:
Total VOCs: 1 ppm
Total petroleum
hydrocarbons: 100
ppm
Batch process
300-400° F soil
exit temperature
Continuous process
Feed rate:
25 tons/hr
Addition of
polymer and
surfactants
Two horizontal
vapor extraction
wells
Vacuum of 378-406
w.c. inches
(absolute)
Depth to
groundwater: 16-
24 feet
20 tons/hr.
450 - 500° F
Excavation
Screening
Excavation
Screening
None (in situ)
Screening
Exhaust gas
treated with
baghouse.
scrubber, and
carbon
adsorption
Scrubber water
treated with
carbon
adsorption
Residual solids
stabilized and
redeposited on-
site
Residual
sludges
disposed off-
site as non-
hazardous waste
Exhaust gases
were treated
with a
catalytic
incinerator and
scubber
Vapors treated
in secondary
thermal
treatment unit;
off -site s/s of
treated soils
For more information
on this project, see
the close out report
available from Region
1.
X-ray fluorescene
(XRF) used on- site for
selective excavation
First use of full-
scale unit; actual
design capacity of
unit is approximately
35 tons/hr.
Newly added or completed projects
E-3
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
II Materials
Site Name, State, Dates III Technology/ III Media Treated III Key Contaminants III Operating 11 Handling (Residuals III
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required ||| Management ||| Comments
2
2
3#
Wide Beach Development,
MY
9/90 to 9/91
Upjohn Manufacturing
Company, PR
1/83 to 3/88
Defense General Supply
Center, OU5, VA
December 1-11, 1992
Thermal
desorption with
APEG
dechlori nation/
SoilTech ATP
Systems, Inc.
Porter, IN
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Terra Vac,
Corp.
Costa Mesa, CA
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Engineering-
Science
Soil (42,000
tons)
Soil (16,000 sq
ft to
approximately
100 ft deep)
Approximately
17,800 gallons
of CC14 was
removed from the
soil
Soil (1,000 cy)
PCBs
Criteria:
Soils >10 ppm PCBs
to be excavated and
chemically treated
2 ppm PCBs
established as
remedial action
contract cleanup
level
Input: 11-68 ppm
PCBs
Output: <2 ppm PCBs;
one sample contained
21 ppm PCBs
Carbon tetrachloride
(CC14)
Criteria:
50 jig/liter CC14
(drinking water
limit); calculated
to correspond to
"non-detectable"
concentration of CC14
in exhaust gas for
three consecutive
months
Input: Up to 2,200
ppm CC14 (initial
concentration)
Output: Less than 2
ppb (final
concentration)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
Continuous process
Preheat/retort
zone residence
time: 30-40
minutes
Retort zone
temperature:
1,160° f
Combustion zone
temperature:
1,293° f
Additives:
Alkaline
polyethylene
glycol (APEG)
19 vacuum
extraction wells
Depth of primary
extraction well:
75 feet
Operational inlet
vacuum: 12 inches
Hg
In situ using one
extraction well
Excavation
Shredding,
grinding
Magnetic
screening
None
Exhaust gas
treated with
cyclone,
baghouse, acid
gas scrubber.
and activated
carbon
adsorpt i on
Treated solids
were intended
to be
redeposited;
however, they
were determined
to be unstable
for backfilling
Discharge of
soil vapors
through 30-ft
stack
No other off-
gas treatment
For further
information on this
dechlori nation
project, see the
Demonstration Test
Report produced by
EPA, Region 2.
For further
information on this
application, see the
Applications Analysis
Report for the Terra
Vac In situ Vacuum
Extraction System
(EPA/540/A5-89/003) .
Pilot study conducted
12/1/92 - 12/11/92
Soil samples revealed
the soil showed no
further contamination
E-4
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
9! Ill III III 1 III s 1 1
HI Site Name, State, Dates Technology/ 1 Media Treated III Key Contaminants I Operating I Handling (Residuals 1
Region ||| of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) |j| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required ||| Management ||| Comments
4
4
4#
Brown Wood Preserving,
FL
10/88 to 12/91
Hoi I ings worth
Solderless, FL
1/91 to 7/91
Wamchem, SC
During 8/93
Land treatment/
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
Seattle,
Wash i ngton
Soil vapor
extraction
EBASCO (ARCS
contractor)
Thermal
desorpt i on
Four Seasons
Greensboro, NC
Soi I/pond
sediment (7,500
cy)
Soil 60 cy (down
to 7 feet deep)
Soil (2,200 cy)
PAHs, defined in
terms of total
carcinogenic
indicator chemicals
(TCICs)
Criteria:
100 ppm TCICs
sampled on 8
subplots
Input: Up to 208 ppm
TCICs
Output: Less than 92
ppm TCICs
TCE, vinyl chloride
Target: total VOCs
1 ppm
Criteria:
Acetone - 97 ppm
Benzene - 2.43 ppm
1 , 2 - D i ch I orobenzene-
- 33.43 ppm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-
- 38.06 ppm
2,4-Dinitrotoluene -
3.62 ppm
Naphthalene - 74.6
ppm
Toluene - 34.5 ppm
1,2,4-
Trichlorobenzene -
4.23 ppm
Total Xylenes - 67.6
ppm
Soil treated in 3
lifts
Retention time: 4
to 15 months
Additives: water
and nutrients
Mixing rate:
tilled once every
two weeks
In situ
Continuous feed
5-7 tons/hr
Site 1 Treated
preparation
(land
clearing)
Excavation
Screening
Tilling
None required
material
vegetated with
grass (no cap)
Retention pond
constructed for
runoff
Air emissions
vented to
atmosphere
Catalytic
oxidation of
off-gas
Further information on
this project is
avai I able from the
Remedial Action Close
Out Report.
Design specifications
were very critical.
Need to pay close
attention to design
specifications
E-5
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
II 1 I!) Materials 1 1
Site Name, State, Dates H Technology/ III Media Treated ||| Key Contaminants III Operating III Handling H Residuals III
of Operation m Vendor H (Quantity) III Treated m Parameters ||| Required 1 Management ||| Comments
5#
5
5
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
2/92 to 3/94
Seymour Recycling, IN
Summer - 1990
August-October, 1986
January- February, 1987
Outboard Marine
Corp./Waukegan Harbor
(OU #3), IL
1/92 to 7/92
In situ
Flushing
Fluor Daniel
Chicago, IL
In situ soil
bioremediation
ABB
Environmental
Services
Thermal
Desorption
SoilTech ATP
Systems, Inc.
Porter, IN
Soil (64,000 cy)
Soil
(12 acres to 10
ft deep.
approximately
43,500 cy)
Soi I/Sediments
(12,800 tons)
VOCs (TCE, BTEX) 14 extraction
PAHs wells, unknown
Pumped until no more
oil recovered
Inside slurry wall
treated water 90%
reduction in COD
54 contaminants
present, including
TCE, TCA, and Carbon
Tetrachloride
No standards or
criteria for this OU
in ROD
PCBs
Criteria:
97% removal of PCBs
Initial: 23,000 ppm
PCBs
Final: Achieved >97%
removal, <9 ppm PCBs
in treated soil
number of trenches
6,300 gallons of
oil recovered
Additives -
nitrogen.
phosphorus,
potassium, sulfur
as fertilizer
(200,000 gallons
of nutrients
added)
Continuous process
Residence time:
15 minutes
Throughput:
8 tons/hr
Preheat zone
temperature:
850° F
Retort zone
temperature:
1200°F
Combustion zone
temperature:
1300° F
I Recovered oi I
sent off -site
Tilling
Excavation
Mixing
Dewatering
for
incineration.
water recovered
sent through
oi I/water
separator, iron
removal, and
biological
treatment prior
to reinjection
Capping in
place
Exhaust gas
treated with
cyclone.
baghouse, acid
gas scrubber.
and activated
carbon
adsorption
Condensed water
discharged to
sanitary sewer
after triple
filtration, Uv
oxidation, and
carbon
adsorpt i on
The soil became
saturated quickly
during this project,
creating surface
pools. The specially-
designed tractor got
stuck.
Reduced PCB levels
much more than
expected.
E-6
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
III III 1 III III ls 1 III
Site Name, State, Dates I] Technology/ II Media Treated |l| Key Contaminants 11 Operating III Handling Hi Residuals 111
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required j|| Management ||| Comnents
Anderson Development Thermal
5
(ROD Amendment), MI
11/92 to 6/93
Verona Well Field
(Thomas Solvent/Raymond
Road) (OU1), MI
3/88 to 5/92
desorption
Ueston
Services, Inc.
Soil vapor
extraction
(attempted
nitrogen
sparging)
Terra Vac, Inc.
Costa Mesa, CA
Soil (5,100
tons)
Soil (26,700 cy.
36,000 ft2 to a
depth of 20 ft.)
SVOCs (MBOCA)
Input: 660 ppm
(maximum) MBOCA
Criteria: 1.684 ppm
MBOCA
Output: <1.684 ppm
MBOCA
Greater than 99%
removal
Initial soil
concentration
TCE 550,000 ppb; PCE
1.8 million ppb;
Toluene 730,000 ppb;
Xylene 420,000 ppb
Criteria in all post
remedial soil
samples; Total
Xylenes 6,000 ppb;
Toluene 16,000 ppb;
Benzene 20 ppb;
Ethylbenzene 14,000
ppb; 1,1- DCE 10
ppb; trans-1,2-DCE
2,000 ppb; 1,1,1-TCA
4,000 ppb; Carbon
tet., 10 ppb; 1,2-
DCA 10 ppb; 1,1-DCA
20 ppb; Methylene
chloride 100 ppb;
cis-1,2 DCE 20 ppb;
PCE 10 ppb; TCE 60
ppb
Continuous with a 1 Excavation
retention time of
1 hour and
throughput of 50-
60 tons per day.
Temperature 500 -
600° F. Moisture
content 40-50%
Most of waste was
treated twice
because 1 hour
retention time was
not enough.
1,400-1,600 cu ft/
min of air
Started >1,000
Ibs/day removed
Total removed
45,000 Ibs of VOCs
23 extraction
wells
screening
dewatering
Stockpiling
No materials
handling;
requi red
installing
extraction
wells
Vapors
initially
treated with
carbon; then
with CATOX;
and then
returned to
carbon
Uastewater
discharged to
treatment
facility.
Treated soils
and fly ash
sent to Type II
Landfill.
Carbon sent to
RCRA disposal
facility
Spent carbon
was regenerated
(and eventually
incinerated)
Site reports
available.
Initial estimate of
product too low.
Treatment equipment
undersized. Needed
better quantification
of VOCs in soils to
design appropriate
size.
Plan for enhancing
system to deal with
saturated soils and
free product.
Public information
available includes
performance report.
and technical memo.
E-7
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
Illl iii I 1 1 . I I
Site Name, State, Dates | Technology/ I Media Treated | Key Contaminants [operating (Handling I Residuals III
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required ||| Management ||| Comments
5#
6#
7#
8
Pristine, OH
9/93 to 3/94
French Ltd.
Crosby, TX
1/92 to 12/93
Hastings GW
Contamination, Well No.
3, NE
6/92 to 7/93
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU 18) Interim
Response, CO
6/91 to 12/91
Thermal
desorption
Bioremediation
(slurry phase)
ENSR
Houston, TX
Soi I vapor
extraction
Morrison
Knudsen
Soil vapor
extraction
Vapor phase
carbon
adsorption to
capture vapors
Woodward Clyde
Denver, CO
Soil (19,400 cy)
Soil/sludge
(150,000 cy)
Soil 1 acre down
to 120 feet deep
(approximately
194,000 cy)
Soil (100 ft
radius down to
60 ft;
approximately
70,000 cy)
Criteria:
aldrin - 15 jig/kg
benzene - 116 ug/kg
chloroform - 2,043
DDT - 487 jig/kg
1,2-DCA - 19 /ig/kg
1,1 -DCE - 285 ug/kg
dieldrin - 6 fig/kg
PAHs - 14 jig/kg
dioxin - 0 tig/kg
PCE - 3,244 /tg/kg
TCE - 175 jig/kg
Volatile organic
compounds; PCBs;
phenols, heavy
metals
Cleanup Goals:
Benzo(a)pyrene - 9
ppm
PCB - 23 ppm
Volatile organic
compounds - 43 ppm
Arsenic - 7 ppm
Benzene - 14 ppm
Carbon tetrachloride
Initial: 100 ppm
Final: <0.2 ppm
Target removal rate
achieved was 0.001
Ib/hr, removed in
excess of 500 Ibs
TCE
Initial extracted
gas concentration 60
ppm
Final extracted gas
concentration
2 to 3 ppm
In situ treatment
In situ cyclic
operation,
operated for a
total of 4,325
hours
145-335 cu.
ft./min. of air
Total removed 70
Ibs.
2 extraction wells
Air sparging
Pumping
Dredging
Vapors treated
with granular
activated
carbon (GAC)
No materials
handling;
required
installing
extraction
wells
In situ
treatment
Carbon sent
off-site for
regenerat i on
Vapors captured
on carbon
First use of
bioremediation
technology at a
Superfund site
Cleanup of
contaminated
groundwater to be
completed in 1996
Soil Vapor extraction
system exceeded
predictions by the
model due to sand and
gravel present at the
site. Cleanup
occurred much quicker
than predicted by the
model.
Sampling indicated the
presence of TCE mainly
in the soil gas
samples and not the
soil samples
E-8
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
II 1 1 Materials ||| |||
Media Treated III Key Contaminants III Operating Handling III Residuals 1
(Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required ||| Management ||| Conments
8#
9
9#
Wastech Chemical, UT
10/92 to 12/92
Fairchild
Semiconductor (San
Jose), CA
1/89 to 6/90
Intersil /Siemens, CA
Intersil portion of the
site completed Fall 93
Bioremediation
(Ex situ) Land
treatment on an
asphalt pad
Harding/Lauson
Soil vapor
extraction, in
situ flushing
with treated
groundwater
Soil Vapor
Extraction
Geo-Matrix, San
Francisco, CA
Soil (1,100 cy)
Soil (42,000 cy)
Soil
VOCs (Toluene,
Xylene)
TCA, DCE, IPA,
xylenes, acetone,
Freon-113, PCE
ROD originally
stated cleanup
target of 1 ppm
Amended cleanup
goals required SVE
operation until VOC
removal rate was
<10X of initial
rate, or VOC removal
rate was <1X per day
for 10 consecutive
days
VOCs (TCE 1,1,1 -TCA,
XyLene)
Tilled, addition
of nutrients and
water
39 extraction
wells; 28-144 scfm
air flow rate; 15
inches of Hg
operating vacuum
None
Soil
redeposited on
site
In situ
treatment;
carbon
adsorption of
off -gases
Air emission standards
not exceeded
Groundwater pump and
treat was conducted in
conjunction with SVE;
slurry wall was
constructed to limit
contaminant migration
E-9
-------
TABLE E-1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
III
1 Site Name, State, Dates
Region ||| of Operation
9
Sacramento Army Depot
Tank 2 Operable Unit. CA
8/92 to 1/93
I III III III Matenals III |l|
Media Treated I Key Contaminants III Operating III Handling III Residuals III
(Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters III Required ||| Management ||| Comments
In-situ soil
vapor
extraction,
extracted vapor
treated with
gas phase
carbon
adsorption.
water treatment
by the existing
on-site Uv-
hydrogen
peroxide
treatment
plant/Terra
Vac, Inc.
San Leandro, CA
Soil (1,000 cy,
25 by 35 ft.,
31 ft. depth)
I
I
VOCs (Ethylbenzene,
PCE, MEK
Total Xylenes)
Initial concentra-
tion:
MEK 0.011 - 150
mg/kg
Ethylbenzene 0.006 -
2,100 mg/kg
PCE 0.006 - 390
mg/kg
Total Xylene 0.005 -
11,000 mg/kg
Clean up goal
1.2 mg/kg NEK
6 mg/kg Ethylbenzene
23 mg/kg total
Xylene
0.2 mg/kg PCE
100 mg/kg total
hydrocarbons
24 hours/day
Air flow rate:
16-365 scfm
None
Extracted vapor
treated with
gas phase
carbon
adsorption
water treatment
by the existing
on-site UV-
hydrogen
peroxide
treatment plant
Freon - 113
unexpectedly extracted
by system - ispaeted
system operation
E-10
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Table E-2 provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment
technologies that have been completed at removal sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace, the information included in table
E-2.
E-ll
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
June 1994
Media Treated
(Quantity)
2
2
2
Signo Trading
International, Inc., NY
10/20/87 to 10/21/87
(Removal)
Vfneland Chemical
Company, NJ
12/92
(Removal)
Zhiegner Refining
Company (Removal)
2/93 - 6/93
KPEG
dechlorination/
Gal son
Remediation,
Syracuse, NY
Mercury
pretreatment
precipiated
mercury salts
into mercury
sulfide so that
the mercury can
be recovered
and recycled.
ENSCO
Mercury
pretreatment
precipiated
mercury salts
into mercury
sulfide so that
the mercury can
be recovered
and recycled.
ENSCO
Sludge (15
gallons)
Solid 100 Ibs
Solid 100 Ibs
Key Contaminants
Treated
Dioxin
input - 155 ppb
Output - 1 ppb
Mercury initial
concentration >10%
mercury
Final concentration
of mercury in
recyclable
precipitate was
greater than 80%.
Less than 260 ppm if
mercury in thatn
nonrecycled salt.
Mercury initial
concentration >10%
mercury
Final concentration
of mercury in
recyclable
precipitate was
greater than 80%.
Less than 260 ppm if
mercury in thatn
nonrecycled salt.
I Materials ||| III
Handling III Residuals I
Requi red ||| Management ||| Comments
Temperature:
150°C
Time: Overnight
Added salt to
precipitate the
mercury
Added salt to
precipitate the
mercury
None
None
None
Incineration of
residuals
(without dioxin
contamination)
at treatment.
storage, and
disposal
facility
Residual salts
containing less
than 260 pm
mercury were
incinerated
off-site
Residual salts
containing less
than 260 pm
mercury were
incinerated
off-site
First known Superfund
site where this
process has been
applied
No comments
Newly added or completed projects
E-12
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
I III III III
Technology/ 111 Media Treated III Key Contaminants ||| Operating
Vendor j|( (Quantity) [(( Treated |([ Parameters
3
4
Avtex Fibers, VA
4/90 to 8/91
(Removal)
General Refining
Company, GA
August-October, 1986
January- February, 1987
(Removal)
Chemical
treatment
(oxidation
using NaClO)
OH Materials,
Findlay, OH
(ERCS
Contractor)
Solvent
extraction
Resource
Conservation
Technology
Company,
Bellevue, UA
Sludge/water
from storage
unit (2 mi 1 1 ion
gallons)
Sludge (3,448
tons)
Carbon disulfide
Criteria: <10 ppm -
Carbon disulfide in
the effluent
Input: 50-200,000
ppm Carbon disulfide
Output: <10 ppm
Carbon disulfide
Input:
PCB - 5.0 ppm
Lead - 10,000 ppm
Output:
PCB - insignificant
Lead - concentrated
in solids
Batch operation
average retention
time - 1 hour
pH - 10
Additives: Sodium
hypochloride.
The retention time
and reagent feed
rates increased
with increasing
concentration of
sludge in the
contaminated
water.
Continuous
operation
Time: 2 hours
pH: 10
Temp: 20°C
Rate: 27 tons/day
Moisture content -
60%
Additives:
Sodium hydroxide
Tr i ethyl ami ne
Materials
Handling
Requi red
Pumping
Excavation
Screening
Neutralization
Size Reduction
Mixing
Residuals
Management
Salts from the
reaction were
removed with
flocculation
and clarifi-
cation at
existing
treatment
plant, pH
adjustment
Oil - used as
fuel for kiln
Water -
treated.
discharged off
site
Solids -
solidified and
disposed of on
site
Comments
Carbon disulfide is
unstable and will be
found with other
contaminants in
aqueous waste stream.
For additional
information on this
project, see the
Removal Close Out
Report available from
EPA - Region III or OH
Materials.
The oil recovered from
the extractions
process could not be
sold because of an
elevated metals
content. The solvent
could not be recovered
due to leaks in system
seals. The unit
required a relatively
uniform material so
materials handling of
the sludges proved
difficult in the
beginning of the
project. The lead-
bearing solids
produced by the dryer
also required special
handling. Finally,
detergents in the
sludge hindered
oil/water separation.
Newly added or completed projects
E-13
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
111 III
Site Name, State, Dates III Technology/ I Media Treated
of Operation ||| Vendor J|[ (Quantity)
4
4
Hinson Chemical, SC
12/88 to 3/92 (Removal)
CSX McCormick Derailment
Site, S.C.
(Removal)
Soi I vapor
extraction
OH Materials
Atlanta, GA
Soi I vapor
extraction with
air flushing
MURI
Soil
(60,000 cy, up
to 50 ft deep)
Soil (200,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Benzene, TCE, PCE,
DCA, MEK
At completion:
<10 ppm Total VOCs
(In all samples);
average <1 ppm Total
VOCs
Benzene-toluene-
ethyl benzene-xy I ene
(BTEX)
130,000 gallon spill
I Materials 1
Handling II Residuals
Required ||| Management
In situ;
continuous
operation (except
for occasional
shut downs to
allow soil gas to
reach equilibrium
in the pore
spaces)
Used a system of
extraction and
injection wells.
1,000 separate PVC
wells. Injection
wells 7 to 8 feet
deep. Extraction
wells 2-3 feet
deep. Vapors
captured and put
through a knock
out pot and
incinerated.
Brought in
clay to cover
the area, to
prevent air
from
infiltrating
Air emissions
captured on
vapor phase
carbon
No cap needed
Residual
wastewater sent
off-site for
treatment
Comments
System was successful
in decreasing concen-
tration to cleanup
goals. Had
difficulties due to
fluctuation of shallow
ground water. Did not
anticipate the change
in ground water to be
as drastic as it was.
It decreased the
efficiency, less
vapors and more water.
Now need to address
ground water. Could
have used the soil
vapor extraction in a
more limited area.
Newly added or completed projects
E-14
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
I*
Key Contaminants
Treated
4
4#
5#
Basket Creek Surface
Impoundment, GA
11/92 - 2/93 (Removal)
TH Agriculture and
Nutrition
Albany, GA
Parson Chemical, MI
Vacuum
extraction of
soil pile with
horizontal
wells (ex-si tu)
OHM
Thermal
desorpt i on/
Focus and
Williams
Environmental
Services, Inc.
In situ
vitrification
Soil (2,000 cy)
Soil (4,318
tons)
Soil (3,000 cy)
VOCs
TCE, PCE, MEK, MIBK,
BTEX
High 33% VOCs
Average 1-5%
Criteria:
TCE - 0.5 mg/L TCUP
PCE - 0.7 mg/L TCLP
All VOCs met TCLP
limits
Pesticides
Criteria:
Reduction of 90% in
concentration of
alpha and beta BHC;
4, 4' -DDT; and
toxaphene
Less than 100 mg/kg
total OCL pesticides
in treated soil
I III Materials
Operating III Handling
Parameters ||| Required
Vacuum pressure
monitored. 1,300
CFM/Manifold
3 manifold
6-7 wells/manifold
Continuous
operation
7.8 tons/hr
250 - 510° F exit
gas temperature
15 minutes
residence time
Surface im-
poundment used
for disposal
of waste
solvents.
Built an
enclosure over
the site.
Excavated the
soi I and
screened it
with a power
screen.
Stacked on PVC
extraction
wells.
Recovered VOCs
with duct work
and fan.
Vapors
incinerated.
Excavation
Screening
III
Residuals If
Management ||| Comments
Residual soils
and rejects
from screening
met TCLP limits
and were
disposed as
nonhazardous as
on RCRA
Subtitle D
landfill.
Incinerated
70,000 Ibs of
VOCs
Soils:
quenched
Off-gasses:
baghouse, water
quench,
reheaters, and
carbon
adsorption
water: carbon
adsorption
$2,000,000 total
costs. Permeability
in-situ soil was not
good at first.
Excavation and ex-situ
treatment improved
permeability.
Shouldn't rule out if
you can't do in situ.
Confirmatory sampling
to occur after melt
cools (approximately
Summer 1995)
Newly added or completed projects
E-15
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
II
Technology/
Vendor |
5
6
7
7
PBH Enterprises, MI
3/25/85 to 10/28/85
(Removal)
Traband Warehouse
PCBs, OK (Removal)
2/90 to 9/90
Crown Plating, MO
10/1/89 to 12/31/89
(Removal)
Scott Lumber, MO
12/89 to 9/91
(Removal)
Neutralization
with
hypochlorite
process
Mid-American
Environmental
Service,
Riverdale, IL
Solvent
Extraction/
Terra Kleen
Dechlorination
using the KPEG
process
EPA removal
contractor
Land Treatment
RETEC
Billings, MT
Media Treated
(Quantity)
Film chips (464
tons or 1,280
cy)
Solids
Liquid (5
gallons)
Soil (15,961
tons)
III Materials
Operating I Handling III Residuals
Parameters ||| Required ||| Management
Cyanide
Input: 200 ppm
Output: 20 ppm
PCBs
Initial: 7,500 ppm
Criteria:
Dioxin - <1 ppb
Input:
Silvex - 10,000 ppm
Dioxin equivalents -
24.18 ppb
Output :
Silvex - 32 ppb
Oioxin equivalents -
0.068 ppb
Input:
1500 - 1000 ppm -
Total PAH
23 ppm -
Benzo(a)pyrene
Criteria:
500 ppm - Total PAH
14 ppm -
Benzo(a)pyrene
Output :
130 ppm Total PAH
8 ppm -
Benzo(a)pyrene
Time: 2-3 hours
Additives: sodium
hydroxide
Batch operation
Retention time -
36 hours
(including time of
equipment
breakdown)
Temperature - 72°C
pH - 13
Moisture content -
100%
Additives:
Water
phosphates
Soil treated in 2
lifts
1st lift - 9
inches
2nd lift - 7
i nches
Cultivated
approximately 1 to
2 times per week
Agitation
Tilling
Removal of
rocks and
debris
Rinse water,
runoff and
waste
hypochlorite -
treated off
site
Treated chips -
landfilled
(Subtitle D)
Built an on-
site vacuum for
emissions
control
Contaminated
residual oil
incinerated
off -site
None
Comments
Newly added or completed projects
E-16
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
I III III III III III Materials
Site Name, State, Dates II Technology/ Ijl Media Treated ||| Key Contaminants II Operating )|| Handling
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||[ Treated ||| Parameters ||[ Required
9
9
9
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
3/28/85 to 6/24/85
(Removal)
Gi la River Indian
Reservation, AZ
6/24/85 to 10/23/85
(Removal)
Roseville Drums, CA
2/12/88 to 11/9/88
(Removal)
In situ
chemical
treatment
(followed by
anaerobic bio-
remediation)
EPA removal
contractor
In situ
anaerobic
biological
treatment
(preceded by
chemical
treatment)
EPA removal
contractor
In situ
Bioremediation
EPA removal
contractor
Soil (3,220 cy)
Soil (3,220 cy)
Soil (14 cy)
Input:
Toxaphene - 1,470
ppm
Ethyl parathion - 86
ppm
Methyl parathion -
24 ppm
Output:
Toxaphene - 470 ppm
Ethyl parathion - 56
ppm
Methyl parathion - 3
ppm
Toxaphene
Input: 470 ppm
Output: 180 ppm
Input:
Dichlorobenzene -
4,000 ppm
Phenol - 12,000 ppm
Output :
Dichlorobenzene -
140 ppm
Phenol - 6 ppra
pH: 10.2 to 11.8
Moisture: wet
Additives to soil:
Sodium hydroxide,
Water
pH: 8.3 to 9.8
Additives to soil:
Sulfur ic acid.
manure, sludge
Additives to soil:
manure, water
Tilling
Tilling
I"
Comments
Bioremediation
Capped in place
The biological
treatment would have
been more successful
if the neutralization
after the chemical
treatment had been
more complete. The
tearing of the plastic
sheets covering the
soils allowed air in
and prevented
anaerobic activity.
Newly added or completed projects
E-17
-------
TABLE E-2
REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1994
II Materials III III
Operating III Handling III Residuals III
Parameters ||| Requi red ||| Management ||| Comments
9
9
10
Stanford Pesticide Site
#1, AZ
3/20/87 to 11/4/87
(Removal)
Poly-Carb, Inc., NV
7/22/87 to 8/16/88
(Removal)
D rex I er- RANCOR, WA
7/92 to 8/92
( remova I )
Chemical
treatment -
alkaline
hydrolysis
EPA removal
contractor
Land treatment
and soi I
wash i ng
EPA removal
contractor
Low temperature
thermal desorp-
tion treatment.
Thermally treat
3,000 tons of
soil on-site up
to 700°F.
Four Seasons
Soil (200 cy)
Soil (1,500 cy)
Soil 3,000 tons
(approximately
3,000 cy)
Methyl parathion
Input: 24.2 ppm
Output: 0.05 ppm
Input:
Phenol 1,020 ppm
o-cresol - 100 ppm
m- and p-cresol -
409 ppm
Output:
Phenol - 1 ppm
o-cresol - 1 ppm
m- and p-Cresol -
0.92 ppm
Petroleum
hydrocarbons
Polynuclear
Aromatics, BTEX
(Benzene, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene, Xylene
200 ppm TPH was
target. Initial TPH
was 70,000 ppm -
(high) 15,000 -
20,000 ppm
(average).
Treated soil
TPH was 100 - 200
ppm
pH: 9.0
Moisture: wet
Additives to soil:
soda ash, water,
activated carbon
Additives: water
16 hours/day
12 to 15 tons/hr
Operating
temperature up to
700° F
Vapors treated by
catalytic
oxidation
Tilling
(in situ. 3
times per
week)
Excavation
Placement in
double- lined
pit
Irrigation
Tilling
Excavation
screening
Removed
material
greater than 2
inches. Rock
washing
station for
particles
greater than 2
inches. Steam
cleaned large
rocks .
Added water
after
treatment for
dust
suppression
Leachate
collection and
treatment with
granular
activated
carbon
Treated soil
was backfilled
back into the
excavated areas
on-site. Soil
that did not
meet the
targets was re-
treated.
Uastewater was
treated on-site
through carbon
filters.
This treatment used
both bioremediation
and soil flushing in
one step.
Total cost
approximately
$250,000.
Newly added or completed projects
E-18
-------
TABLE E-3
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Table E-3 provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment
technologies that have been completed at non-Superfund sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace the information included in
table C-l.
E-19
-------
TABLE E-3
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
June 1993
I III III III III III Materials III III
Site Name, State, Dates III Technology/ III Media Treated III Key Contaminants III Operating III Handling II Residuals III
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required ||| Management ||| Comments
5
6 #
9
9
Saginaw Bay Confined
Disposal Facility, MI
October 1991 to June 4,
199Z (Army)
Matagorda Island Af
Range, TX
10/92 to 2/28/93
Ft. Ord Marina, Fritzche
AAF Fire Drill Area, CA
Winter 1991
(Army)
Marine Corps.
Mountain Warfare Center
Bridgeport, CA
8/89 to 11/89
(Navy)
Soil washing;
Water with
flocculant and
surfactant as
an additive
Bermarm USA
Stafford
Springs, CT
Ex situ
bioremdiation;
solid phase
All constructed
on abandoned
runway.
Bacteria added
and
mechanically
mixed.
Four USTs found
contamination
under one LIST.
CCC, Inc.
San Antonio, TX
Land farming
Bioremediation
(ex situ); heap
pile bioreactor
Sediment (150
cy)
Soil (500 cy)
Soil (4,000 cy)
Soil (7,000 cy)
PCBs
Input Sediment = 1.6
mg/kg
Output Sand =0.20
mg/kg
Output Organics = 11
mg/kg
Output Fines = 4.4
mg/kg
TPH, PAHs
benzene- toluene-
ethylbenzene-xylene
(BTEX)
TPH - 3,400 ppm
BTEX - 41.3 ppm
Criteria:
Texas water
commission standards
100 ppm for TPH
30 ppm for combined
BTEX
TCE, MEK, TPH, BTEX
PAHs (petroleum
hydrocarbons,
diesel), Metals
(Lead)
After 2 months of
operation the TPH
levels were 120 ppm
30 cy of sediment
treated per day
Batch process
Retention time: 3
months
9 inch layers
treated.
Ambient
temperature
bacterial added to
waste
Initial
concentration >
1,000 ppm
End concentration
< 200 ppm
Dredging
Screening
Size Reduction
Excavated
approximately
40 by 60 ft
area.
Constructed on
poly barrier
and clean sand
base. Did
some mixing.
None
Excavat i on
Residuals were
left at the
facility
Wastewater
discharged to
conf i ned
disposal
facility
Backfilled the
soil into the
excavation
None
Forced cold-weather
shut down is a
limitation
Island is now a
wildlife refuge, has
an endangered species.
Gail Youngblood
408-242-8017
Temperature, pressure
and moisture content
are monitored
Bill Major (DoD)
805-982-1808
Newly added or completed projects
E-20
-------
TABLE 3-4
OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)
June 1993
I Site Name, State, Dates I Technology/ III Media Treated III Key Contaminants III Operating
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated ||| Parameters
9#
9
Luke AFB, AZ
11/92 to 5/9
Davis Monthan AFB, AZ
July 1991 to March 1992
Naval Communication
Station, Scotland
February to October 1985
(Navy)
Soil vapor
extraction with
air flushing
and thermal
oxidation of
off-gases
Jacobs
Engineering
Bioremediation
(In situ soil)
Bioremediation
In situ soi I,
in situ ground
water
Soil (35,000 cy)
Soil (440 cy)
Soil,
Groundwater
Soil quantity
approximately
800 m2 in area,
depth unknown
VOCs
(2-hexanone, 2-
butanone, 4-methyl 2
pentanone, BTEX)
Removed
approximately 11,000
Ibs of vapors and
4,000 Ibs of
condensate
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbones)
TPH (No. 2 diesel
fuel)
In situ down to
100 feet
Microorganisms
function best
between 20°C and
35°C.
1 Materials I
Handling III Residuals III
Required ||| Management ||| Comments
None
Run-off water
collected in a
trench
Vaports were
thermally
oxidized
None
Total petroleum
hydrocarbons were
present but were too
heavy to volatilize.
Would recommend
combining SVE with in
situ bioremediation to
treat contaminants
that could not be
extracted with the
SVE.
The contaminated area
had considerable
slope, and the
contaminated soil was
a thin layer over a
relatively impermeable
rock substrate.
Newly added or completed projects
E-21
-------
TABLE E-4
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Table E-4 lists the sites at which innovative treatment technologies are used together with established or other innovative treatment
technologies in treatment "trains." Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to prevent
the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium.
E-22
-------
FIGURE E-l
SUPERFUNDREMEDIALACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
TOTAL TREATMENT TRAINS = 38
Solidification/
Stabilization
Bioremediation (5 sites)
In Situ . _. _ ..
Bioremediation In Situ Rushing
(2 sites)
Solidification/
Stabilization
(iste)
Incineration
(1 site)
Solidification/Stabilization
(5 sites)
In Situ
Bioremediation
(4 sites)
E-23
-------
TABLE E-4. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
June 1994
Dechlorination Followed by
Soil Washing Myers Property
Soil Washing Followed by (continued)
Ex Situ Bioremediation Followed by
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3
J. H. Baxter
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
Oklahoma Refining Co.
PABOil
In Situ Flushing Followed by
In Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Bioremediation
Peak Oil/Bay Drums, OU
Pester Burn Pond
Idaho Pole Company
Montana Pole Company
Soil Vapor Extraction Followed by
In Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
Solidification/Stabilization
Soil Washing
Swope Oil & Chemical Co.
JADCO - Hughes
Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc.
Genzale Plating Company, OU 1
Zanesville Well Field
Soil Washing Followed by
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Cabot Carbon/Koppers
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
Moss-American
Koppers (Oroville)
NJ
PA
CA
NC
OK
LA
FL
KS
MT
MT
NJ
NC
NY
NY
OH
FL
FL
NC
WI
CA
Incineration
Incineration
Solidification/Stabilization
Arkwood
South Cavalcade Street
Gould, Inc
Solvent Extraction Followed by
Incineration
Solidification/Stabilization
United Cresoting
O'Connor
Thermal Desorption Followed by
Dechlorination
Dechlorination
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
AR
TX
OR
TX
ME
Arlington Blending & Packaging TN
Co., OU 1
Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1 KY
Sarney Farm NY
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor IL
Carter Industries MI
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) CO
Waldick Aerospace Devices NJ
USA Letterkenny (SE Area, OU 1) PA
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc., OU 2 IL
Carter Industries MI
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) CO
E-24
-------
TABLE E-5
REMOVAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Table E-5 lists the at which innovative treatment technologies are used together with established or other innovative treatment
technologies in treatment "trains." Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to
prevent the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium.
E-25
-------
TABLE E-5. REMOVAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
June 1994
Chemical Treatment Followed by
In Situ Bioremediation Gila River Indian Reservation
AZ
In Situ Flushing Followed by
In Situ Bioremediation Polycarb
NV
Soil Washing Followed by
Bioremediation Southeastern Wood Preserving MS
Solvent Extraction Followed by
Solidification/Stabilization General Refining
GA
E-26
-------
-------
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
NCEPI
P.O. Box42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242-0419
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
EPA 542-R-94-005
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard. 12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
------- |