United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Water          August 1982
Regulations and Standards (WH-553) EPA-440/4-85-010
Washington DC 20460
Water
An Exposure
and Risk Assessment
for Lead

-------
                                    DISCLAIMER
This is a contractor's final report, which has been reviewed by the Monitoring and Data Support
Division, U.S. EPA. The contents do not necessarily  reflect the views and policies of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention  of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Region 5, Library (PH2J)
           77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Ftaw
           CWc«$o, IL   60504.3590

-------
50J72-10t
REPORT DOCUMENTATION *• «EPORT NO. 2.
PAGE EPA-440/4-85-010
4. Titla and Subtitle
An Exposure and Risk Assessment for Lead
7. Authoru) Perwak, J.; Goyer, M. ; Nelken, L.;
Payne, E.; and Wallace, D.
9. Performing Organization Nama and Address
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
20 Acorn Park
Cambridge, MA 02140
12. Sponsoring Organization Nama and Address
Monitoring and Data Support Division
Office of Water Regulations and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
3. Recipient's Accacaion No.
s. Report Data Final Revision
Aueust 1982
6.
8. Parforming Organization Rapt. No.
10. Projact/Taak/Work Unit No.
11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No.

-------
                                          EPA-440/4-85-010
                                          July 1981
                                          (Revised August 1982)
        AN EXPOSURE AND RISK ASSESSMENT

                   FOR LEAD
                      DV
                 Joanne Perwal;
          Muriel Goyer,  Leslie Nelken,
         Edmund Payne,  Douglas Wallace
            Arthur D.  Little,  Inc.
         U.S.  EPA  Contract  68-01-5949
                Richard Healy
               Project Manager
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Monitoring and Data Support Division (WH-553)
  Office of Water Regulations and Standards
           Washington, D.C. 20460
  OFFICE OF WATER REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
    OFFICE OF WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT
    U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

-------
                                FOREWORD
      Effective  regulatory  action  for  toxic  chemicals  requires  an
 understanding of  the human  and  environmental  risks  associated with the
 manufacture,  use, and disposal  of the chemical.   Assessment  of  risk
 requires  a scientific judgment  about  the probability  of  harm to  the
 environment resulting  from  known or potential environmental  concentra-
 tions.   The risk assessment process  integrates health effects  data
 (e.g.,  carcinogenicity,  teratogenicity)  with information on exposure.
 The  components of exposure  include an  evaluation of the  sources of the
 chemical,  exposure pathways,  ambient  levels,  and an identification  of
 exposed populations including humans and  aquatic life.

      This  assessment was performed as part of  a program to determine
 the  environmental  risks associated  with  current  use and disposal
 patterns  for  65  chemicals  and  classes of chemicals  (expanded  to  129
 "priority  pollutants") named in the 1977  Clean Water Act.  It includes
 an assessment of  risk  for humans and aquatic life  and  is  intended  to
 serve  as  a technical  basis for developing  the most  appropriate and
 effective  strategy for mitigating these risks.

     This  document  is  a  contractors'   final  report.    T.t  has  been
 extensively reviewed by  the individual contractors «?nd  by the  EPA  at
 several stages of completion.   Each chapter  of  the draft was reviewed
 by members of the  authoring contractor's  senior technical staff (e.g.,
 toxicologists, environmental  scientists)  who had  not  previously been
 directly  involved in  the work.  These  individuals were  selected by
 management  to  be  the  technical peers of the  chapter  authors.   The
 chapters were  comprehensively checked for uniformity in  quality and
 content by the contractor's editorial team, which also was responsible
 for  the production  of  the final  report.   The contractor's  senior
 project  management subsequently  reviewed  the  final  report  in  its
 entirety.

     At  EPA  a senior  staff member  was  responsible  for  guiding the
 contractors, reviewing the manuscripts, and soliciting comments,  where
 appropriate, from related programs within EPA  (e.g., Office of  Toxic
 Substances,  Research  and   Development,   Air  Programs,  Solid   and
Hazardous  Waste,   etc.).    A  complete  draft was   summarized  by  the
 assigned  EPA  staff  member  and reviewed for  technical  and  policy
 implications with  the  Office  Director (formerly the  Deputy  Assistant
Administrator)  of  Water  Regulations  and  Standards.   Subsequent  revi-
sions were included in  the final report.
                         Michael W. Slimak,  Chief
                         Exposure Assessment Section
                         Monitoring & Data Support Division (WH-553)
                         Office of Water Regulations and Standards
                             iii

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                      Page

  LIST  OF  TABLES                                                        ix

  LIST  OF  FIGURES
                                                                       XI

  1.0   TECHNICAL  SUMMARY                                               1_1

  1.1   Risk Considerations                                             11
       1.1.1  Humans                                                   1  •,
       1.1.2  Biota                                                    £3
  1.2   Sources of Lead to the Environment                              j__4
  1.3   Fate and Distribution of Lead in the Environment                1-5


  2.0   INTRODUCTION                                                    2-i


 3.0  MATERIALS BALANCE                                               3_1

 3.1  Introduction                                                    3 ,
 3.2  Production of Lead                                              3 /
      3.2.1  Primary Production                                      3_4
      3.2.2  Secondary Production                                    3_7
 3.3 Uses of Lead                                                   2_g
      3.3.1  Emissions from the Use of Lead                          3-11
     3.3.2  Inadvertent Sources of Lead  Emissions                    3-H
 3.4 Future  Projections  for Lead                                    3_12
 3.5 Summary                                                        3-12
 4.0  FATE AND DISTRIBUTION OF LEAD  IN THE ENVIRONMENT                4-1

 4.1  Introduction                                                    ,_,
 4.2  Distribution of Lead in the Environment                         4_1
     4.2.1  Water and Sediment                                       ^
            4.2.1.1  Freshwater                                      4_-L
            4.2.1.2  Seawater                                        4-1
            4.2.1.3  Rainfall                                        4_4
            4.2.1.4  Urban Runoff                                    4_4
            4.2.1.5  STORET Data                                     4_4
            4.2.1.6  Lead in Sediment                                /. e.
     4.2.2  Air                                                      , °
     4.2.3  Soil                                                     I
     4.2.4  Biota                                                    £-13
     4.2.5  Limitations of Monitoring Data                           4_13
4.3  Fate of Lead in the Environment                                4-15
     4.3.1  Introduction                                             -

-------
                           TABLE OF  CONTENTS  (Continued)
     4.3.2  General Fate Processes
            4.3.2.1  Atmospheric Transport
            4.3.2.2  Fate Processes in Aquatic Environments
            4.3.2.3  Fate Processes in Terrestrial Environments
     4.3.3  Major Environmental Pathways
            4.3.3.1  Pathway ?fl — Atmospheric Transport
            4.3.3.2  Pathway #2 -- Solid Wastes, Tailings,
                     and Municipal Landfills
            4.3.3.3  Pathway #3 — Aqueous Industrial Discharge
            4.3.3.4  Pathway #4 — Publicly-owned Treatment Works
4.4  Overview
     4.4.1  Atmospheric Levels and Pathways
     4.4. 2  Aquatic Levels and Pathways
     4.4.3  Terrestrial Levels and Pathwavs
5.0  HUMAN EFFECTS AND EXPOSURE
                                                                    5-1
5.1  Human Toxicity                                                 5_]_
     5.1.1  Introduction                                            5_1
     5.1.2  Metabolism and Bioaccumulation                          5-1
            5.1.2.1  Absorption                                     5-1
            5.1.2.2  Distribution and Retention                     5-3
            5.1.2.3  Elimination                                    5-4
            5.1.2.4  Metabolism of Organolead Compounds             5-4
     5.1.3  Human and Animal Studies                                5-4
            5.1.3.1  Carcinogenesis                                 5-5
            5.1.3.2  Mutagenesis                                    5-7
            5.1.3.3  Adverse Reproductive Effects                   5-8
            5.1.3.4  Other Toxic Effects                            5-11
     5.1.4  Overview                                                5-16
            5.1.4.1  Ambient Water Quality Criteria - Human Health  5-16
            5.1.4.2  Other Considerations                           5-17
5.2  Human Exposure                                                 5-19
     5.2.1  Introduction                                            5-19
     5.2.2  Populations Exposed Through Food                        5-20
            5.2.2.1  Pathways of Exposure                           5-20
            5.2.2.2  Total Dietary Intake — Adults                 5-24
            5.2.2.3  Total Dietary Intake — Infants and Children   5-24
     5.2.3  Populations Exposed Through Drinking Water              5-25
            5.2.3.1  Pathways of Exposure                           5-25
            5.2.3.2  Drinking Water Exposure — Adults              5-26
            5.2.3.3  Drinking Water Exposure — Infants and
                     Children                                       5-26
     5.2.4  Populations Exposed Through Inhalation (Air,  Dirt,
            and Dust)               '                                5_26
            5.2.4.1  Pathways of Exposure                           5-26
                                  vi

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (Continued)
             5.2.4.2   Inhalation  Exposure — Adults                   5-28
             5.2.4.3   Inhalation  Exposure — Infants  and  Children    5-28
      5.2.5   Populations  Exposed  Through Other  Routes                 5-28
             5.2.5.1   Cigarettes                                      5-28
             5.2.5.2   Dirt and Dust                                   5-28
             5.2.5.3   Paint                                           5-29
             5.2.5.4   Other Routes                                    5-29
      5.2.6   Blood Levels Associated with Various Subpopulations      5-29
      5.2.7   Summary — Exposure  Scenarios                            5-33
             5.2.7.1   Introduction                                    5-33
             5.2.7.2   Exposure Estimates                              5-33
6.0  BIOTIC EFFECTS AND EXPOSURE                           .         6-1

6.1  Effects on Biota                                               6-1
     6.1.1  Introduction                                            6-1
     6.1.2  Freshwater Organisms                                    6-1
            6.1.2.1  Chronic and Sublethal Effects                  6-1
            6.1.2.2  Acute Toxicity                                 6-3
            6.1.2.3  Effects on Microflora                          6-3
     6.1.3  Marine Organisms                                        6-6
     6.1.4  Factors Affecting the Aquatic Toxicity of Lead          6-6
     6.1.5  Terrestrial Organisms                                   6-9
            6.1.5.1  Animals                                        6-9
            6.1.5.2  Plants                                         6-10
     6.1.6  Summary                                                 6-11
6.2  Exposure to Biota                                              6-13
     6.2.1  Introduction                                            6-13
     6.2.2  Aquatic Organisms                                       6-14
            6.2.2.1  Pathways of Exposure
            6.2.2.2  Environmental Factors Affecting Lead
                     Exposure and Uptake                            6-15
            6.2.2.3  Monitoring Data                                6-16
     6.2.3  Terrestrial Organisms                                   6-16
            6.2.3.1  Mammals                                        6-16
            6.2.3.2  Birds                                          6-18
            6.2.3.3  Terrestrial Plants                             6-20
            6.2.3.4  Summary                                        6-21
7.0  RISK CONSIDERATIONS                                            7-1

7.1  Humans                                                         7-1
     7.1.1  Introduction                                            7-1
     7.1.2  Adults                                                  7-4
     7.1.3  Children                                                7-6
                                  vii

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS  (Continued)

                                                                    Page

7.2  Risks to Biota                                                 7.5
     7.2.1  Aquatic Organisms                                       7_6
     7.2.2  Terrestrial Organisms                                   7-10
            7.2.2.1  Mammals                                        7-10
            7.2.2.2  Birds                                          7_10
            7.2.2.3  Plants                                         7_H


APPENDIX A  NOTES ON THE DERIVATION OF TABLE 3-1                    A-l
                                 viii

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES
Table
 No.
                                                                    Page

 3-1      Summary of U.S. Supply, Use, and Emissions, 1976          3-2

 3-2      Capacities and Locations of U.S. Lead Smelters
          and Refineries, 1977                                      3.5

 3-3      U.S.  Leading Lead-Producing Mines in Order of
          Output,  1975                                              3_6

 3-4      U.S.  Supply and Demand Relationships of Lead,  1965-76     3-10

 3-5      U.S.  Forecasts for Lead Demand,  1976 and 2000             3-13

 3-6      Summary  of World Lead Reserves                             3_14

 4-1      Concentrations of Lead in Water                            4-2

 4-2      Concentrations of Lead in Sediment                         4-3

 4-3      Mean  and Maximum Ranges  of Lead  Concentrations             4-7

 4-4      Concentrations of Lead in the Atmosphere                  4-9

 4-5      Concentrations of  Lead in the Soil                         4_H

 4-6      Concentrations of  Lead in Biota                            4-14

 4-7       Concentration  and  Distribution of Lead in the
          Water Column                                               4-22

 4-8      Lead Bioaccumulation Levels and Bioconcentration
          Factors  in Aquatic Species                                 4-24

 4-9       Lead Accumulation  by Vegetation                            4-31

 4-10      Effluent Data  From U.S. Municipal Treatment Plants
          Using Various  Treatment Methods                            4-44

 5-1      Human Exposure to Lead Through Inhalation                  5-27

 5-2      Exposure Estimates of Lead for Adults and Children
         Living in Rural, Urban, and Industrial Environments 5-34,35,36

6-1       Sublethal Effects  of Lead  on Freshwater
          Fish                                                      6_2

6-2      Chronic and Sublethal Effects of  Lead on
         Freshwater  Invertebrates                                  6_4
                                    ix

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

Table
 No-                                                                 Page

 6-3       Acute Toxicity (LC5Q)  of Lead to Freshwater Fauna         6-5

 6-4       Acute Toxicity (LC5Q)  of Lead to Marine Invertebrates     6-7

 6-5       Measurements of Total Lead Concentrations in   or
          U.S. Minor River Basins, 1979                             6_17

 7-1       Adverse Effects of Lead on Humans                         7-2

 7-2       Human Exposure to  Lead as Evidenced by Blood
          Levels in  the United States                               7-5

 7-3       Concentrations of  Lead in Water                           7-9

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
  No.
  3-1     Environmental Flow of Lead,  1976 (kkg)                     3.3

  4-1     Mean Ambient  Values of Lead  Concentrations  in
          U.S.  Surface  Waters,  1970-79 (Detected  Levels Only)        4-5

  4-2     Major Environmental Pathways of  Lead  Emissions          4-16,17

  4-3     Schematic Diagram  of Major Pathways of
          Anthropogenic  Sources  of Lead Released  to the
          Environment in the  United States, 1976                     4_13

  4-4     Adsorption of  Heavy Metals in Oxidizing Fresh Waters       4-21

  4-5      Adsorption of  Heavy Metals on Soil Minerals and Oxides     4-27

  4-6      Downward Movement of Lead in Soil                          4_2s

  5-1     Population Exposure Routes for Lead                       5_2i

 5-2     Exposure Scenarios  — Adults  (Absorbed Dose)              5-37

 5-3     Exposure Scenarios  — Children with Pica (Absorbed Dose)  5-38
                                 xi

-------
                            ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
     The Arthur D. Little, Inc., Task Manager  for  this report was  Joanne
Perwak.  Other major contributors were Melba Wood  and Edmund Payne
(monitoring data), Leslie Nelken (environmental fate), Muriel Cover
(human effects and risk), and Douglas Wallace  (aquatic effects and
exposure).  Alfred Wechsler and Kate Scow reviewed this document.  In
addition, Laura Williams, Nina Green, and Irene Rickabaugh were respon-
sible for editing and report production.

     The materials balance for lead (Chapter 3.0) was provided by
Versar, Inc.   Gay Contos was the Task Manager for Versar.

     Richard Healy, Richard Silver, and Ruth Wilbur reviewed the document
at U.S. EPA.
                                 Kill

-------
                           1.0  TECHNICAL SUMMARY
      The Monitoring and Data Support Division, Office of Water Regulations
 and Standards of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is conducting
 risk assessments for pollutants that may enter and traverse the environ-
 ment, thereby leading to exposure to humans and other biota.  The program
 is in response to Paragraph 12 of the NRDC Consent Decree.  This report is
 a risk assessment for lead using available data and quantitative models
 where possible to evaluate overall risk.

 1.1  RISK CONSIDERATIONS

      Children are particularly susceptible to the toxic effects of lead
 and lead exposure is still considered a major problem for children in the
 United States today.  Lethalities are not  as common as they once were;
 however, long-term effects such as learning and behavioral'problems may
 occur,  and remain after symptoms of clinical lead toxicity have disappeared.
 Ingestion of  paint chips is considered the major source of lead exposure in
 children,  especially in those  from 1-3 years of age.   Ingestion of contami-
 nated dirt and dust is  also a  significant  source of exposure in the vicinity
 of heavy traffic areas  and industrial areas,  especially smelters.

      In adults,  the effects of  lead toxicity are on a much more limited
 scale.   The primary exposure route is through food;  a large  part  of this
 exposure results from processing and  contamination of canned goods  with
 lead  solder.   In isolated  situations  of  high concentration of lead  in air
 or drinking water,  however,  these  pathways  can dominate  food exposure.   Lead
 poisoning  has  also  been  observed in adults  as a result of  moonshine consump-
 tion, and  the  consumption  of food  from improperly  glazed earthenware.

      Risk  to aquatic organisms as  a result  of exposure to  lead  does  not
 appear  to  be widespread, because lead  concentrations  in the  aquatic  envi-
 ronment  are generally low  compared  to  levels  at which effects are generally
 observed.   Waterfowl, however, are  still at risk because of  exposure  to
 lead  shot.  The  use  of lead  shot, however,  is  being severely limited, and
 this  problem is  expected to  diminish  rapidly.

 1.1.1  Humans

     The effects of  lead on  humans have been  extensively studied.  However,
 exposure levels  that were once considered acceptable have been lowered
 because of  the increasing evidence of subtle  effects at blood lead values
 that result in no overt symptoms of lead toxicosis.

     Although human data on the carcinogenicity of lead are limited, no
 evidence suggests that lead is carcinogenic in humans.  Feeding  experi-
ments with rodents have indicated some carcinogenic activity; however,
 this activity occurs at levels that are far in excess of the maximum
 tolerated dose of lead in humans (550 mg elemental lead per day).
                                  1-1

-------
     Evidence for chromosomal abnormalities  in humans  resulting  from
lead exposure is inconclusive and contradictory.   Studies  in  animals
are also conflicting.  However, lead can exert a profound,  adverse
effect on the fetus and can interfere with the reproductive ability  of
both men and women exposed to high levels  (blood lead  levels  (PbB) of
30-40 ug/100 ml).  Such levels are most common in  occupational situa-
tions.  Because the fetus develops so rapidly, it  is particularly
vulnerable to intrauterine exposure to lead.  Such effects  as increased
incidences of stillbirths, preterm deliveries, and early fetal membrane
rupture have been associated with elevated exposure to lead.  Incidences
of decreased fertility in occupationally-exposed men have also been
reported.  However, no data suggest that lead is teratogenic  in  man.

     Other toxic effects of lead are directed primarily at  three target
organs; the erythroid cells of the bone marrow, the kidney, and  the
central and peripheral nervous system.  The  inhibitory effects of lead
on erythropoiesis are reversible; however, severe  acute or  chronic lead
poisoning may be followed by irreversible injury to the kidney and
nervous system.

     The disruption of hemoglobin synthesis  is generally considered  the
first observable adverse effect of lead exposure and is the effect most
commonly found.  The inhibition of heme synthesis  can eventually result
in clinical anemia at blood levels greater than 80 ug/100 ml  in  adults,
although mild anemia may occur at blood lead levels of 50 ug/100 ml.
Children may be affected at levels of about  40 ug  lead/ml of blood.
A depression of ALAD (an enzyme necessary for the  production of  heme)
activity has been observed at PbB of 10-20 ug/100 ml or lower.

     Proximal tubular dysfunction can occur  in both children  (PbB=40-120
Ug/100 ml) and adults (PbB >70 ug/100 ml) and is generally noted after
short-term exposure.   Although little is known about dose-response
relationships,  PbB greater than 70 ug/100 ml for prolonged periods may
give cause to irreversible functional and morphological renal changes.

     The effects of lead on the central nervous system are probably  the
most serious.  Manifested as encephalopathy,  effects on the central
nervous system are seen more frequently in children than adults.   Com-
monly observed  symptoms include dullness, hyperkinetic or aggressive
behavior,  headaches,  muscular tremors,  hallucinations, and in severe
cases,  convulsions,  mania, paralysis,  and coma.   The minimal PbB levels
associated with encephalopathy are estimated to be about 30 ug/100 ml.
Subtle impairment of cerebral function has been observed at levels over
40 yg/100 ml.  The peripheral nervous  system may also be affected by
exposure to lead.   Such effects as slowed nerve conduction have been
reported at blood levels exceeding 50  ug/100 ml.

     The pathways of human exposure to lead are numerous and sometimes
complex.  Food is generally considered the largest source of lead expo-
sure in adults, although both drinking water and air can be more
significant in some situations.  Consumption of paint chips is considered
                                   1-2

-------
 an important source of lead in children, and probably the most widespread-
 however, ingestion of dust and dirt may also be important in urban and
 smelter areas.  Sources of lead in the diet may include contamination
 resulting from processing and lead-soldered cans, past use of lead arsen- •
 ate pesticides, deposition on soil or plants from such sources as automo-
 bile and smelter emissions, contamination of moonshine whiskey, leaching
 from improperly glazed earthenware, and uptake from cooking water.  The
 contamination of food through the use of lead solder in cans represents
 the most widespread source of lead in the diet.   The "average" adult con-
 sumes 100-200 yg lead/day in food, while children consume about 100 yg/day.
 Up to 50% of this amount has been attributed to  lead solder in cans.
 Persons giving near sources of lead may consume  more because of the con-
 tamination of local crops.

      Drinking water does not generally contribute greatly to human
 exposure.  However, concentrations greater than  50 tag/1 can result from
 lead service lines, plumbing,  solder,  and storage containers.

      Inhalation can be an important exposure pathway for adults in urban
 or industrial areas (i.e.  smelters).   In these areas,  the primary  sources
 of lead are automobiles and lead  industries.   The deposition of lead  on
 dirt and dust provides an important exposure route for children via
 ingestion;  however, this exposure  route is  not well  quantified.

      The ingestion of  paint and contaminated soil  is especially serious
 in children having pica (tendency  to  ingest nonfood  items).   It has been
 estimated that one-third to one-half of the 1-3-year-old  children  have
 pica.   However,  little is known about  their behavior or  the  amount
 ingested.

     An examination of the  literature on human blood levels of lead
revealed a typical range of 9-24 yg/100 ml  in the blood of adults.   Most
of this  (6-18 yg of lead per 100 ml of blood) is  attributed to intake
from food.  Assuming a log-normal distribution of blood levels, less than
5% of the urban population would have blood levels greater than 30 yg/100
ml, and less than 0.5% of the rural population.   Mean levels greater than
20 yg/100 ml have been reported in adults in the  immediate vicinity of
highways, and levels greater than 40 yg/100 ml in adults living near a
smelter.

 _     Blood  levels  of lead in children  are  consistently higher  than adults
 in the  same environment.  Lead screening programs  detect  about  40,000
 children annually  with blood lead  levels greater  than  30  yg/100 ml.
 Again,  elevated  blood  levels  (greater  than  30-40  yg/100 ml) have been-
 found in a  large proportion of children living near  roadways and urban
 areas,  in rural  areas  with  lead paint  problems, near primary and
 secondary smelters, and near battery plants.

 1.1.2   Biota
tal lrleitIUVff?CuS °f,lead in the laboratory  (including developmen-
tal irregularities) have been observed at concentrations of less than
                                  1-3

-------
 10 ug/1 for rainbow trout in soft water.  Several other freshwater fish
 species are similarly affected in the range of 10-100 u*/l.  4 variety
 or freshwater fish and invertebrate experience chronic toxic:tv in   '
 concentrations of 100-1000 ug/1 in soft and moderately hard water, based
 primarily on effects  on early life stages.   Acute effects  are observed in
 a few species at  the  upper end of this  range.   Most freshwater aquatic
 species experience acute effects in the range  of 1-100 mg/1 total lead.

      Aquatic organisms may be exposed to lead  through water,  diet  and
 sediment.   The relative importance of these routes is highly  variable
 and  depends  on the species and the environment.   Exposure  is  enhanced'
 in the presence of high concentrations  of  lead,  especially in soft,
 acidic waters.  Mean  total lead concentrations were generally below
 iU yg/l m  1979.   However,  concentrations  of approximately 25,000 ug/1
 which  sometimes results in fish kills,  have been reported  near  such
 sources as an old  smelter  and  a tailings pond.   In addition,  a  concen-
 tration of less than  1000  ug/1  resulted  in  a fish  kill  in  1970.

     High concentrations of total  lead  (mean >50 ug/1, with ar  least  20%
of the, observation levels  >100  ug/1) have been found  in the Catawba-Wate'ref
Basin,  the James River, the Fox River-Wolf Creek drainage  basin,  and  the
Kootenai River.  Identifying areas with high aquatic  exposures  is difficult
because of analytical problems and the inherent problems with a^re-ations
of monitoring data.  The identification of localized  lead  exposure areas
requires a more detailed investigation than was conducted here.   In addi-
tion, the local conditions including pH, hardness, etc. great]y influence
toxicity.  These factors have only been considered on a broad scale in
this  analysis.

      The data on  lead toxicity in waterfowl, ducks,  and gallinaceous
 birds  clearly indicate that  ingestion of spent lead shot can  be lethal;
 numerous incidences of waterfowl mortality  as a  result  of  ingesting
 spent  lead  shot have  been  reported.   Waterfowl kills are more prevalent
 in areas under heavy  hunting  pressure (such as the Mississippi  Flyway)
 and  in lakes and marshes with  hard bottoms, where  lead  shot can accumulate.

 1.2   SOURCES OF LEAD  TO THE ENVIRONMENT

      In 1976,  the  supply of lead was  approximately 1,515,000  kkg.   About
 34%  of this  supply resulted  from domestic  ore production,  while about
 35%  resulted from  secondary production.  The remaining  supply consisted
 of imported  ores and  metals,  and industry  stocks.

     Approximately 49% of  the  industrial supply  was consumed  in the
 manufacture  of lead-acid storage batteries  and the production of  battery
 oxides.  The production of antiknock  gasoline additives consumed  about
 14%  of the  supply.  The remaining 37% of the industrial supply  was  used
 for  such purposes  as  the production of  red  lead  and litharge, ammunition,
 solder, weights and ballast,  pigments,  cable covering,  brass  and  bronze,
 sheet  lead,  bearing metals, caulking metals, pipes,  and type metal.
                                   1-4

-------
      Of  the  identified  releases  to  the  environment  (-355,000-360,000 kkg),
 53  %  are airborne  and 46%  are  in the  form  of  solid  waste.   Known releases
 to  surface waters  and POTWs  account for less  than 1%  of  the total.

      Of  the  estimated 190,000  kkg lead  released  to  the atmosphere,  the
 releases from  the  use of leaded  gasoline comprise about  93%.   Releases
 from  fossil  fuel combustion, lead smelters, iron and  steel  production,
 battery  manufacture, and copper  and zinc smelting,  each  contribute
 about  1-2% of  the  total known  airborne  releases.  However,  some  of
 these  sources  may  be important in local areas.

      It  was  difficult to quantify releases of lead  to water because  of
 large  gaps in  the  data.  However, aquatic discharges  from the  major  uses
 of  lead  are  assumed to be  small.  Of  the known releases  to  the aquatic
 environment  (800-950 kkg), 53%-63% are  attributed to  the iron  and steel
 industry, 21%  to lead production, 6%  each to battery  production  and  the
 nonferrous metal industry, and 4% each  to the inorganic chemical and
 pulp and  paper industries.  Urban runoff probably represents the major
 source of lead to  the aquatic  environment, and perhaps as much as
 21,000 kkg to  surface waters and  POTWs.   However, these releases are
 largely  a result of the deposition of airborne releases.

     Solid wastes  represent a large source of lead  (-165,000-163,000 kkg)
 to  the environment.  Solid wastes are primarily produced as a result of
domestic ore production (34% of the known total), and ammunition use
 (30% of  the total).  Other important sources include solder, weights
and ballast,  bearing metals, and  iron and steel production.

     Numerous uncertainties exist in the materials balance for lead.   The
releases from the production, use, and disposal of lead-acid storage
batteries are largely unknown,  although  lead-acid storage batteries
represent the single largest use of  lead.  In addition,  releases from
other uses are unknown,  and releases from relatively minor uses may be
of concern,  although they are believed to be small compared  with airborne
releases and  solid  waste.


 1-3 FATE AND  DISTRIBUTION OF LEAD IN THE ENVIRONMENT

     Since the atmosphere receives the  greatest portion of releases,
 it  is  important to consider the fate of  lead in this media.   Transport
 of  lead  in the atmosphere depends on particle size,  chemical form, and
 the distribution and height of the release.  Particles larger  than
 20  ym are rapidly  deposited.  Although automobile exhaust, the largest
 single source, contains lead in extremely small aerosol sizes, with a
mass median diameter of 0.5 pm or less,  large particles may be released
during cold start or acceleration.  These larger particles are deposited
onto the roadway, or within a few meters.  Smaller particles also are
deposited, to some extent,  near the  roadway by impaction; however,  some
fraction is carried a distance (-100 m)  from heavily travelled roads
                                   1-5

-------
and may be deposited by washout.  Still, precipitation may  carry  some
of the particles a considerable distance; thus, more remote areas may
be contaminated.

     Lead releases from smelter, fossil fuel  combustion, and  iron and
steel production are primarily from elevated  point sources  and are
generally less than 1 ym in size.  Consequently, these particulates
are widely dispersed and are primarily deposited by precipitation.
Smelter emissions result in significant deposition of lead  at distances
up to two miles from the smelter.  Fugitive dusts account for higher
deposition near the source.  Airborne releases from mining  and milling
operations will largely be in the form of fugitive dusts, resulting in
localized deposition.

     The deposited lead forms from all atmospheric sources  are largely
insoluble.  Lead accumulates in plants, leaf  litter, and soil.  Runoff
and erosion introduce lead into surface waters as a suspended solid,
which results in sediment concentration.

     The monitoring data for lead generally reflect these fate pathways.
The range of lead levels in air for remote areas of the  continental United
States is 0.0001-0.01 yg/m^.  In contrast, urban areas show levels of
0.5-10 yg/rn^, which are considerably higher,  primarily because of auto-
mobile use.  The monitoring data show rapid deposition; and it has been
estimated that lead levels in air generally decrease by about 50%
between 10 and 20 meters from the highway.

     Elevated atmospheric lead levels are also found in the vicinity of
point sources,  such as smelters, in the range of 0.4-4 yg/m^.   Consider-
ably higher levels have occasionally been reported, however.

     Direct sources of lead to water are largely unidentified, although
probably relatively small.   Lead reaching surface waters is likely to
be strongly sorbed onto suspended solids and sediments.  Because lead
in the sediment is strongly sorbed,  it is unlikely to be desorbed as a
result of a physical disturbance.  Changes in the water chemistry, for
example,  pH,  could result in an increased solubilization of lead.   Lead
found in the water column is expected to be strongly complexed by
organic molecules.  Lead can bioconcentrate in aquatic organisms up to
2-4 orders of magnitude above water concentrations.   It appears to be
fairly persistent in aquatic biota,  with a lifetime of at least several
months.  Little evidence suggests biomagnification of lead in aquatic
food chains.

     Typical levels of lead in U.S.  waters are less than 25 yg/1.   Levels
of lead in seawater are considerably lower,  on the order of 0.005 yg/1.
Lead concentrations in surface waters are higher in urban areas than
in rural  areas.
                                 1-6

-------
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
      Sediments contain considerably higher levels of lead than surface
 waters.   Coastal lead sediment contains approximately 100 mg/kg, while
 the  average lead in river sediments was estimated to be about 20 mg/kg.
 Higher concentrations were found in STORE! data,  with mean concentra-
 tions  ranging from 27-267 mg/kg,  during 1973-79.

     Lead transported to  soil  is  quite  strongly sorbed,  and,  under most
 conditions,  is not subject to  leaching.   The  movement of lead with the
 erosion  of  soil particles is likely,  however.   Entrainment of soil
 particles is  also  a possible route  of lead transport.   In addition,
 uptake of lead into plants can occur, although  only  a small portion
 of the total  lead  in any  soil  is  available for  plant uptake.   Biocon-
 centration  factors  are generally  less than 1, although  they may  be
higher in the  roots.

     Monitoring  data for  lead  in  soils  largely  reflect airborne  deposi-
 tion patterns.   An  average  concentration  for lead  in U.S.  soils  appears
 to be about 20 mg/kg in uncontaminated  soils.   Elevated  concentrations
are found in  the vicinity  of highways (up  to 7600 mg/kg),  and, in
general,  in urban areas where  a range of  100-800 mg/kg lead in soil is
found.   Elevated concentrations are also  found  in the vicinity of
smelters  (up  to  about 8000 mg/kg),  in the vicinity of houses  that  at
one time were painted with lead-containing paints, and in  old orchard
soils.   Urban dust is also found to contain High levels of lead.    Con-
centrations of about 1000-1600  mg/kg are found in urban residential
areas and 1400-2400 mg/kg in commercial areas.
                                  1-7

-------
                             2.0   INTRODUCTION

      The Office of Water Planning and Standards, Monitoring and Data
 Support Division of the Environmental Protection Agency is conducting a
 program to evaluate the exposure to and risk of 129 priority pollutants
 in the nation's environment.  The risks to be evaluated included potential
 harm to human beings and deleterious effects on fish and other biota   The
 goal of the task under which this report has been prepared is to integrate
 information on cultural and environmental flows of specific priority pollu-
 tants and estimate exposure of receptors to these substances'.   The results
 are intended to serve as a basis for developing a suitable regulatory
 strategy for reducing the risk,  if such action is indicated.

      This document is a brief  assessment of the effects,  exposure,  and
 potential risks that result from the production,  use,  release,  and distri-
 bution of lead.   Numerous  authors  have  noted a number  of  problems  associated
 with an analysis  of  lead.   First,  the literature  on  lead  is voluminous and
 could not be comprehensively reviewed within the  time  constraints  of this
 report.   Therefore,  previous reviews  have  been extensively  used  and  have
 been supplemented  with  information  from the  recent literature.   Although
 this may  not be  the  most  satisfactory approach, in general, it was deemed
 the  most  appropriate  and  effective  for  the  purposes of  this report.

      Second,  the problems with analyses, and  sample and laboratory contami-
 nation  have  been widely acclaimed.   Statements, in this report,  have been
 qualified on  the basis of recent analytical data.  However, older data,
 and  even  recent data, can reflect this problem and could not be  actively
 addressed in  this work.

     Third, and perhaps most significant, regulatory mechanisms are
 currently being effected for lead from many sources.  Thus, exposure
 estimates and conclusions can be expected to change over the next ten
years.  This report attempts to point out which exposure routes will be
affected, and which exposure routes will continue to be a problem.

     This report is organized as  follows:

     •  Chapter 3.0 contains information on the production,
        discharge,  and disposal of lead.

     •  Chapter 4.0 describes available  monitoring data and a
        consideration of the fate of lead in five  specific
        pathways.

     •  Chapter 5.0 discusses the effects of lead  on  humans  and
        describes  exposure scenarios.

     •  Chapter 6.0 considers the effects and exposure  of  biota
        to lead.

     •   Chapter  7.0 discusses risk considerations  for various
        subpopulations of humans and biota.

                                  2-1

-------
                         3.0  MATERIALS BALANCE
 3.1  INTRODUCTION

      Lead emissions to the environment may result from primary and
 secondary production of lead and from the use of refined lead in manu-
 factured products.  In addition, the concentrations of lead that occur
 naturally in the environment may cause inadvertent emissions as a result
 of the processing of these materials.  This section of the report has
 been assimilated from four basic sources:  government publications, trade
 journals, standard references and text,  and data published by the American
 Bureau of Metal Statistics.   This materials balance examines'releases of
 lead to the environment of the United States for 1976.

      Although more recent data are available for some of the use cate-
 gories and for most of the production categories, the most accessible
 and reliable literature is for 1974-76.   The most definitive source of
 information on lead emissions is Nriagu  (1978),  whose information and
 assumptions are based on data for 1974 and 1975.   Also,  in considering
 the ranges of uncertainty in the information available on lead uses and
 emissions — typically an order of magnitude or  more —  attempts  to scale
 data for 1974 and 1976 to a  later year,  such as  1978,  would require
 adjustment factors that are  small in comparison  to the data uncertainties;
 therefore,  such adjustments  seem unwarranted.  In effect,  the  data
 presented are approximately  as reliable  for any  year between 1974 and
 1978 as for the year 1976.

      Lead is recovered from  lead sulfide  ores.   In 1976,  domestic mine
 production  was  518,000 kkg.   The total primary U.S.  smelter/refinery
 production  in that year was  597,000  kkg  (domestic plus imported ores),
 while secondary production  (scrap  processing) contributed  526,000 kkg  to
 the U.S.  supply.   Imports provided  79,000  kkg of  ore and  129,000 kkg of
 lead metal  in 1976.   Industry  stocks  (January 1)  contributed 263,000 kkg,
 which brought the  total U.S.  1976  supply  to  1,515,000  kkg.  At the  end of
 1976,  5400  kkg of the supply was exported and 140,000  kkg  remained  in
 industry  stocks,  leaving  1,370,000 kkg for  industrial  consumption.
 Table 3-1 presents  a  summary of  the  lead supply,  demand, and emissions.
 Notes explaining  the  data in Table 3-1 are  in Appendix A.  Where firm
 data  were unavailable, estimates were based on engineering assumptions
 about manufacturing and use processes.

     Approximately 49% of the industrial supply was consumed in the
manufacture  of  lead-acid storage batteries and the production of battery
oxides.  About  14% of the supply was consumed for the  production of anti-
knock gasoline  additives.  The remaining  37% of the industrial supply
was used in  twenty-two other categories.   Figure 3-1 is a graphic repre-
sentation of  the flow of lead from commerce and inadvertent sources to
the media.
                                  3-1

-------
                               TABLE  3-1.   SUMMARY  OF  U.S.  LEAD  SUPPLY,  USE,  AND EMISSIONS,  1976*
                                                                                       (kkg)
 Production and Emissions

 Domestic  ore mining  and milling,
   smelting,  and refining
 Imported  ores (smelting and  refining)
 Imported  metals
 Industry  stocks,  January  1
 Secondary production

 Uses  and  Emissions

 Lead-acid storage batteries
   (e.g.,  grids and posts)
 Storage battery oxides
 Gasoline  antiknock additives
 Red lead  and litharge
 Ammunition
 Solder
 Heights and  ballast
 Pigments
 Cable covering
 Brass and bronze
 Sheet lead
 Searing metals
 Calking metals
 Pipes (traps  and  bends)
 Collapsible  tubes
 Type metal
 Terne metal
 Annealing
 Miscellaneous  chemicals
 White lead
 Lead plating
 Casting metal
 Galvanizing
 Foil
 Other
 Exports,  metal
 Industry  stocks, December 31

 Inadvertent Emissions
                                           Suoslv
518,000^
 79.00091
129,000^
263,000®
526,000^
                                                       Consumption
                348,000®
                398,000®
                217,000®
                 77,000®
                 66,000*2
                 57,OOoS
                 20,000®
                 15,000®
                 14,000®
                 14,000®
                 22,000®
                 12,000®
                 11,000®
                 13,000®
                  2,110*;
                 14,000^
                  1,400®
                  2,600®
                  '• 'uu^v
                    350®
                  6,080®
                  1.140*
                  *.«08
                 48,000^
                  5,440
                140,000
                              Airborne
                              Emissions
820®
           Aquatic
         Discharges
 MA.
180 S
                                                 MA
           3-110©
           Discharges
            to POTWs
                                                                 NA
                          10-4303
                              MA!
Solid
Vastes
                                                                               MA
Combustion of oil
Combustion of coal
Iron and steel production
Copper and zinc smelting
Timber products
Leather tanning
Petroleum refining
Paint and ink manufacturing
Coal mining
Inorganic chemical manufacturing
Textiles
Pulp and paper
Rubber products
Laundries
Miscellaneous chemicals (pesticides) manufacturing
Nonferrous metals
Fertilizer (phosphatic)
POTW discharges
TOTAL 1,515,000 1,513,000
2.63C&2
48o£f
1,240®
1,800©
0
0
NA@
o
NA©
NA
0
-o
-o
0
NA
NA
" n^
60-960^
189,000-190,000
0
NA
5000
NA
-0
-0©
-00
0
NA0
10-500
100
400
NA5<
°X
NA®
500
MAX
10*^
800-950
0
0
5000
NA
-00
-00
-0®
-00
NA
40
100
100
o|t
.0©
5JA0
ioO
-0©
-
590-1,010
0
1,4300
3,73oC|
5,4000
NA
NA
-0
NA
HA©
NA
NA
NA
NA
0
NA
NA
95©
250-3,680^?
165,000-168,000
Note:  MA - Not available
	Numbers aay not add due to rounding.
 Circled numbers refer to notes in Appendix A.
                                                          3-2

-------
                          1 .|iO-*&3 JTOi
STOCKS .AMUAN*
            COMtUfTlOM Of Oil.
              • STCli, MIGOUCTIO«I
                'CMJ >»T>cigcs >•••:
     FIGURE 3-1   ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW OF LEAD, 1976 (kkg)
                                    3-3

-------
     Of  all  estimated  emissions  of  lead  to  the  environment,  53% are
airborne and 47% go to land.  Identified emissions  to water  and POTWs
account  for <1% of all emissions.   Emissions from the use  of leaded
gasoline comprise over 93% of all airborne  emissions of approximately
190,000 kkg.  Although few sources  of aquatic discharges were quantified,
aquatic discharges from iron and steel production are the  primary  source
of waterhome wastes, which amount  to approximately 53-63% of aquatic
discharges.  Solid wastes, which are primarily  generated during mining
and beneficiation processes and as  a result of  ammunition  use,  contain
between  165,000 kkg and 168,000 kkg of lead.

3.2  PRODUCTION OF LEAD

     Lead is recovered from naturally-occurring sulfide ores, which
typically contain between 1 and 6%  lead.  Zinc and, to a lesser extent,
other metal sulfides are often associated with  lead sulfide.  The  domestic
lead production is comprised of primary and secondary (scrap) sources.
Six domestic smelters and five refineries processed 518,000  kkg of  domes-
tically mined ores and 79,000 kkg of imported ores in 1976 (Nriagu  1978).
Capacities and locations of domestic lead smelters are presented in
Table 3-2.   Approximately 85 companies operating 115 plants  produce lead
and lead alloys for industrial use  from recycled materials,  principally
old batteries.   Two companies, NL Industries and RSR Corporation,  operate
about 18 secondary smelters; these  smelters account for over  one-half of
the total secondary lead production (U.S. Bureau of Mines  1977a).
Thirteen companies operating approximately 24 plants account  for most
of the remaining secondary lead production  (U.S. Bureau of Mines 1977a).

3.2.1  Primary Production

     In 1963, vast deposits of lead ore were discovered in Missouri; and,
in 1976, Missouri contributed 82% of the total domestic production.
Idaho contributed 9%,  Colorado 4%,  and Utah 3%.   The 25 leading mines
listed in Table 3-3 accounted for over 99% of the total U.S.  production
(U.S.  Bureau of Mines  1977b).

     Prior  to smelting, standard crushing,  grinding, and flotation methods
are used to beneficiate lead ore at the mine site.   To obtain the end
product, three  operations take place at the smelter (U.S.  Bureau of Mines
1977a).

     •  The ore concentrate is sintered with additional charge
        material of recycled sinter, sand,  and other inerts;  this
        process oxidizes the lead and sulfur when they change to
        oxides  and agglomerates  the charge  to form a dense perme-
        able mass suitable for furnace feed.

     •  The lead oxide in the sinter is reduced  to produce molten
        lead.

     •  The resultant  lead bullion  is refined to eliminate impurities.


                                  3-4

-------
1



1
1
1


1

1

1

1

1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1

TABLE 3-2. CAPACITIES AND LOCATIONS
SMELTERS AND REFINERIES,

Company Location

Bunker Hill Bradley, IDa
St. Joe Minerals Herculaneum, M0a
AMAX Boss, MO3


ASARCO Glover, MO3

El Paso, TXb
h
East Helena, MT
h
Omaha, NE

E>enotes primary smelter and refinery.
ASARCO plants at El Paso, Texas and East Helena
smelters only. They supply feedstock to ASARCO
Omaha, Nebraska.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Mines (1977a).



3-5

OF U.S. LEAD
1977

Capacity
(kkg)
117,910
204,075
126,980


99,770

81,630

81,630

163,260

, Montana are
's refinery at







-------
             TABLE  3-3.  U.S. LEADING LEAD-PRODUCING MINES
                         IN ORDER OF OUTPUT,  1975
       Mine

Buick
Fletcher
Magmont
Ozark
Brushy Creek
Viburnum #29
Viburnum #28
Bunker Hill
Lucky Friday
Indian Creek
Star Unit
Viburnum #27
Leadville Unit
Idarado
Bingin
Ontario
Sunnyside
Balmat
Pan American
Austinville and
  Ivanhoe
Camp Bird
Emperius
Ground Hog
Pend Oreille
Eagle
    County  and  State

 Iron, MO
 Reynolds,  MO
 Iron, MO
 Reynolds,  MO
 Reynolds,  MO
 Washington, MO
 Iron, MO
 Shoshone,  ID
 Shoshone,  ID
 Washington, MO
 Shoshone,  ID
 Crawford,  MO
 Lake, CO
 Ouray & San Miguel, CO
 Utah, UT
 Summit, UT
 San Juan,  CO
 St. Lawrence, NY
 Lincoln, NV

Wythe, VA
 Ouray, CO
Mineral, CO
Grant, NM
Pend Oreille, WA
Eagle, CO
         Operator

AMAX Lead  Co.
St. Joe  Minerals Corp.
Cominco  American,  Inc.
Ozark Lead Co.
St. Joe  Minerals Corp.
St. Joe  Minerals Corp.
St. Joe  Minerals Corp.
The Bunker Hill  Co.
Hecla Mining Co.
St. Joe  Minerals  Co.
Hecla Mining Co.
St. Joe  Minerals  Co.
ASARCO,  Inc.
Idarado  Mining Co.
Kennecott  Copper  Co.
Park City  Ventures
Standard Metals  Corp.
St. Joe Minerals  Corp.
St. Patrick Mining Co.

New Jersey Zinc  Co.
Federal  Resources Co.
Minerals Engineering Co,
ASARCO,  Inc.
The Bunker Hill Co.
New Jersey Zinc Co.
Source:   U.S.  Bureau of Mines (1977b).
                                  3-6

-------
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
      Sintering  is  carried  out  in  updraft  sintering  machines  of a type
 commonly  used in the metals  production  industry.  The  lead oxide is then
 reduced in  a blast furnace that separates  the  charge into  four layers:
 slag,  speiss (essentially  arsenic and antimony),  matte (mostly copper
 and other metal sulfides), and product  lead  metal.  The lead contains
 varying amounts of other metals that are  removed  by refining.

      Usually, copper dressing  is  the first step in  refining.   The bullion
 is maintained above the melting point of  lead  but below the  melting
 point  of  copper.   The copper begins to  freeze  and floats to  the surface.
 The scum  floating  on the surface  is referred to as  dross and is skimmed
 and processed for  metal recovery.

      Other  impurities, such  as arsenic, antimony, tin,  gold, and silver,
 are removed by  similar operations of melt-freeze  cycles.   The  refining
 process is  complex and variable depending on the  impurities  present in
 the original concentrate.

      Emissions  from Primary  Production

      Environmental emissions of lead from primary production are in the
 form  of particulate airborne emissions  from  mining, milling, and materials
 handling  operations; airborne  emissions are  also  associated with blast
 furnaces  and dressing operations.  However,  in smelting  and  refining
 operations, precautions are  generally taken  to control emissions.   Parti-
 culates in off-gas streams are cooled and treated by baghouses.   Some
 plants also use the off-gases  to produce sulfuric acids.   These  mechanisms
 effectively reduce a large portion of the airborne  emissions of  lead.
 The total known airborne emissions from mining, milling, smelting,  and
 refining  processes are estimated at 1500 kkg for  1976,  for both  domestic
 ores and  foreign ores that are smelted and refined  domestically.

     Aquatic discharges may  result from the  flotation beneficiation
 process.  Aquatic  discharges are probably small when compared with other
 emissions from primary production because lead metal and most lead com-
 pounds have extremely low solubility in water.   Based on the releases of
 one plant, it has been estimated that losses of approximately 180 kkg
 have resulted from smelting and refining operations.

     Solid wastes  from primary production occur as unrecovered metal in
mine tailings;  however,  from emission control systems,  they occur as
 sludges.  The total estimated amount of solid wastes generated by primary
 production from both foreign and domestic ores is 56,000 kkg.

     Detailed explanations of the emissions associated  with primary
production are  given in Appendix A.

3.2.2  Secondary Production

     The recovery of lead from scrap metal is a significant contributor
to the annual lead  supply.   In 1976, 526,000 kkg of  lead (approximately
                                  3-7

-------
 35% of  the  total  supply) was  recovered  from scrap.   Nearly 70% of
 secondary production  of lead  is  derived from storage batteries (U.S.
 Bureau  of Mines 1977a).

     The remaining  30% is composed  of solder,  type  metals, drosses,  and
 residues.   The processing procedure depends on the  composition of the
 scrap.  In  general, secondary lead  production  has three  major phases.

     Pretreatment involves crushing and breaking the scrap metal  into
 suitable sizes and  smelting and  refining of the crushed  scrap.

     Crushing of  the  scrap is normally  accomplished by jaw crushers.
 Smelting and refining operations are similar to the primary lead  produc-
 tion, except some plants employ  reverberatory  furnaces rather than blast
 furnaces.   In addition, secondary lead  processors do not employ a
 sintering step because (1) lead  is  present  in  oxide form in the scrap,
 and (2) the scrap material contains  essentially no  sulfide.

     Emissions from Secondary Production

     Environmental emissions  of  lead from secondary production  operations
 are largely unquantifiable.   Smelting and refining  of secondarv lead  is
 estimated to generate 180 kkg of airborne lead.  Data on aquatic  dis-
 charges and solid waste generation  are  unavailable.
                                     «
 3.3  USES OF LEAD

     Refined lead has a minimum purity  of 99.85% and  is  marketed  in four
 grades:  (1) corroding lead,   a designation  used to  describe lead  of high
 purity; (2)  chemical lead, lead of high  purity  but  not desilverized;
 (3) acid-copper lead,  made by adding copper  to  fully-refined  lead; and
 (4) common desilverized lead,  a designation used for fully-refined
 desilverized lead.

     Over 49% of the total U.S.  demand,   746,000 kkg, is  used  for  the
production of lead storage batteries.  Approximately 47% of this  total
 (348,000 kkg) is used for the production of the battery posts and grids.
The remaining 398,000 kkg is  used in the manufacture of  lead oxides that
is used in batteries  (Lead Industries Association.  Inc.  1978).  The
life span of storage batteries is typically 2-4 years; almost: all the
spent batteries are reprocessed by secondary smelters to recover  the
lead values.  Recycled batteries are the major source of feedstock for
the secondary smelters.

     The next largest  use of  lead is in the manufacture  of  gasoline
antiknock additives, tetraethyl-lead and, to a lesser extent, tetramethyl-
lead.   The production  of  these additives consumed  217,000 kkg of lead
 (approximately 14% of  the total demand)  in 1976.  These additives  are used
to increase  the octane rating  of gasolines.   Except  for a slight increase
in 1976, the consumption  of  lead for additive production has decreased
since 1972.   Consumption  of  lead for automotive applications will  probably
                                   3-8

-------
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
 continue to decrease because later model automobiles have catalytic
 converters that preclude the use of leaded gasoline.

      The remaining 37% of the lead consumed has many uses.  The American
 Bureau of Metal Statistics and the Lead Industries Association, Inc.
 (American Bureau of Metal Statistics 1978) compiles annually a list of
 twenty-two applications for the remaining 37% of the lead supply.   None
 of these applications consumes more than 5.5% of this supply.  Use
 patterns for 1965-76 are shown in Table 3-4.

      One of the larger uses of lead is the production of red and white
 lead  used in paint pigments.   In the past, lead-base paints were used
 extensively;  however,  because of their toxicity, use has been restricted
 to protective exterior coatings for bridges and ships or in applications
 where lead-base paints are sealed with a nonlead paint coating.

      Most of  the remaining uses of lead are congruent with the properties
 of the metal.   Lead is dense,  malleable,  has  a relatively low melting
 point,  and is almost insoluble in water.   In  addition,  lead is highly
 resistant to  corrosive chemicals and high frequency  electromagnetic
 radiation and it has good lubricative properties.  Consequently,  it  is
 used  for weights and ballast  in sailboats and for  fishing tackle  and also
 for ammunition and ordnance.

      Lead is  a soft metal;  thus  it is  amenable to  uses  such as solder-
 ing and  calking  metals.   Collapsible tubes for material packaging, such
 as artists' paints,  are  made  of  lead,  particularly if the material is
 corrosive.  For  use in structural  applications,  lead  must be alloyed with
 other  metals  to  increase its  strength  and  hardness.   Terne metals
 (ternary  lead  alloys)  are  used  in  structural  applications.   Other
 alloys  include  type  metal,  used  in the  printing  industry,  casting metal
 and specialized  brass  and  bronze  alloys.

     Because  lead  is relatively  insoluble  in  water, it  has  been used for
 plumbing  pipes;  recently, however,  this use has become  specialized and
more limited  to  applications where  lead's  corrosive resistant  property
 is important.  Lead  or lead alloys  are used for piping  and process vessels
 in the chemical  process  and other  industries  where the  handling of corro-
sive fluids is necessary.  Lead or  its alloys  are  also  used  for cable
sheathing, galvanizing,  and electroplating.

     Sheet lead is used  for radiation shielding in hospitals and nuclear
plants.  Lead foil is often used for the transport of radioactive material.
Because lead has good lubricative properties,  it is used  for bearings and
in specialized alloys.  Lead chemicals are used in pesticides and for
glazing operations in the glass and ceramic industry.  Environmental
emissions from these sources (see Appendix A) result from the volatiliza-
tion,  leaching, or disposal of lead or lead bearing materials  (U.S.  Bureau
of Mines 1977a).
                                   3-9

-------
                                                       TABLE  .1-4.   U.S.  SUI'I'I.Y AND DKMANI) KKLATIONSHII'S OK LKAII. 1965-76
U>
Components of U.S. Supply

lloine.sl ic  Ores
(•'orei^D Ores
SecoiuLiry (Scrap)
Saleb t>l  CuvL Stockpile
Imports,  Melal
Industry  Stocks .Ian.  1

           TOTAL

Distriluit I on ol  Supply

Industry  Slock;, Due.  Jl
Export.-!.  Mel.il
          TOTAL INDUSTRY DEMAND

Kiul ll.ii1 DuuLind Pattern

Casoline  Additives (SIC 2911)
Transportation (SIC 1691, 37)
Const rue I ion (SIC 344)
I'.iints (SIC  2851)
Ammunition  (SIC 148)
Electrical  (SIC 3356,  3357,  3691)
III her

          TOTAL
1965
279,356
106,119
449,872
48,071
202,261
179,586
1,265,265
175,051
7,256
1.082,958
204,075
354,637
124,259
98,863
51,699
85,258
164,167
.[966
294,775
115,189
4)9,895
58,048
258,496
175,050
1.341,453
186,842
4,535
1,150,076
224,029
366.428
119,724
108,840
70,746
92,514
167,795
1967
239,448
113,375
432,619
25, 396
330,148
186,842
1, 127,848
209,517
6, 149
1,111,982
224,029
357, 158
108,840
91,421
71,653
88,886
167,795
19h8
1)1.055
110.654
427.197
26,303
106,566
209,517
1,411.292
15 j.28)
7,256
1 ,250,75)
2 17,6)4
410,8/1
106,1 19
99,7/0
74,) 74
78,909
241,076
1969
476,175
117,910
468,012
19,954
253,05)
151,28)
1 ,488, 187
206 , 796
4,5)5
1,277,056
245, 797
446.244
107,93)
92,514
71,651
87,072
225,84 3
1970
487,059
127,887
458,942
10,884
222,215
206 , 796
1 , 5 1 3 , 78 )
295,682
7,256
1,210,845
25 1,05)
497,0)6
109.747
89 , 79 )
6(>.2I 1
78,909
1 16,096
1971
5 1O.595
7), 467
444,410
9,070
175,051
295.682
1 ,528,295
224,029
5,442
1 ,298,824
2 )9,448
566,875
90,700
7 1,467
79,H|(,
1 18,81 7
129,701
1*7?
528,781
95,2)5
451,686
40,815
221,122
224,029
1,561,668
239,448
7,256
1.31 (.,964
251,05)
605,876
79,816
80.72)
77,095
116, 096
104,305
1 9/3
522,4 12
100,677
488,8/3
191 ,377
161 ,446
2)9,448
I ,704,25)
194,098
60,769
1 ,449, 186
248,518
6 )4 , 900
78 . 909
98 , 86 )
7), 467
122,445
192,284
1974
5)1 ,502
87,9/9
545, 107
241,262
IO/.02I,
194,098
1 , /(Id. 9 74
261,216
56 , 2 )4
1 , 189,524
226,750
711 ,995
70.746
105,212
78,909
12(1,6 II
75,281
|.,7',
482.',.'.',
96,14.'
51 1 ,548
l>, t48
89 , 79 1
21,1 . 'I/
,,,47.57.
26 1.0 III
19,047
1 , 11,5,49',
189,561
624, OK,
62, ',8 1
71.651
68,02',
68,9 12
80,72 1
19/6
5 1 7 . H>, .
78.9(19
526, 06O
0
I2H./94
21,1,0 IO
1 , 514.. 6 911
1 I9,((/H
5,442
1 , 169,5/0
•I7,4i,l
/I il, 1111
4 >. I'.n
96, 142
Mi, /I 1
1 16, (I'M,
II M.I 29
                                        1,082,958   1,150,076   1,111,982  1,2',0.75)   1,277.056   I.2IO.845   1,298,824   1,316,964  1,449,186   l.)89.524  I.I65.V.5   ,,
      Source:   U.S.  Bureau of Mines  (1977a);  American Bureau of Metal Statistics  (1978).

-------
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
 3.3.1  Emissions from the Use of Lead

      Although batteries account for a large portion of lead use, they
 are enclosed packages of lead; thus,  none of this lead escapes into the
 environment during use (Hepple 1971).  However, limited data substantiate
 that airborne and aquatic emissions have been estimated to be 1700 and
 3-110 kkg,  respectively, during the manufacture of batteries (see
 Appendix A, notes 6 and 35).   Solid waste discharges are thought to be
 insignificant because of recycling.

      The single largest anthropogenic environmental discharge of lead
 results from the use of organic lead  compounds as antiknock additives
 in gasoline.   Approximately 176,000 kkg of airborne lead emissions occur
 annually from the combustion of gasoline.   This source comprises over 93%
 of the airborne lead emissions from all sources.

      Aquatic discharges of  lead from  use activities are not well defined.
 Lead discharges to  the aquatic media  are not believed  to be significant
 because lead and most lead  compounds  have extremely low solubility in
 water.   The only known aquatic discharges from use activities  are derived
 from pigment manufacture and  are estimated to be  approximately  15 kkg.
 In addition,  an estimated 45  kkg of lead are discharged to  POTWs from
 pigment production.

      Solid  waste results  from the disposal of lead or  lead  bearing
 materials or from nonreusable products,  such as ammunition  and  ordnance.
 Ammunition  and  ordnance  are  the largest  contributors of solid waste  from
 lead use activities.   They contributed about 50,000 kkg in  1976,  which
 is about 51%  of  all  identified  solid  waste emissions from use activities.
 Other  important  sources  include  lost  and  discarded weights  and  ballasts
 (-10,000 kkg),  discarded  bearings (-9500  kkg), and spent soldering metals
 (-5700  kkg).  Other  sources of  solid  waste from the lead use categories
 and  from lead bearing materials  are summarized in  Table 3-1 and Figure  3-1
 Gathering of  data and  estimates  is  detailed in Appendix A.

 3.3.2   Inadvertent Sources of Lead Emissions

     At  low level concentrations, lead is  ubiquitous in the biosphere.
 It occurs naturally in virtually every mineral and many organisms.  The
 processing of these materials may result in  lead emissions because of
 its presence in  these materials.  This is  particularly  true if large
 quantities of the material are processed.  For example, the combustion
 of fossil fuels  and smelting of other important metals  result in anthro-
 pogenic environmental discharges of lead.  Lead and lead chemicals are
 present in some products that are used by  industry in their material
 processing.   Most of the important sources of lead, where lead is
 inadvertently discharged, are presented in Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1.

     Urban runoff is likely to be an important source of lead to aquatic
environments.  In stormwater runoff  from one city, lead concentrations
ranged from 0.1-2.85 mg/1, with a mean concentration of 0.46 mg/1
                                  3-11

-------
 (U.S. EPA 1974).  Similarly. Bennett  and  coworkers  (1981)  reported
 levels of approximately 1 mg/1  in stormwater  and  snowmelt  runoff  from
 Boulder, Colorado.

     Considerable other data on levels of  lead  in urban  runoff will  not
 be reviewed here because it is  extremely difficult  to  choose  a represen-
 tative concentration.  For example, assuming  a  concentration  of 1 mg/1
 and a runoff volume of 21xlQl2  l/yr (U.S.  EPA 1977), a loading of
 21,000 kkg may be estimated.  About 82% of this,  or 17,000 kkg, would
 go directly to surface waters,  while  about 4000 kkg would  go  to POTWs.
 Even though this is a rough estimate, it does represent  the largest
 source to aquatic environments.  This value,  however,  is not  shown in
 Table 3-1 or Figure 3-1, because it is believed to  be  largely attributable
 to airborne releases.

 3.4  FUTURE PROJECTIONS FOR LEAD

     The U.S. Bureau of Mines (1977a) has  projected an annual growth  rate
 of 1.8% for lead production and consumption through the year  2000.  The
 growth areas of lead by end use pattern are presented  in Table 3-5.

     The largest area of growth is expected to be in the transportation
 industry (U.S. Bureau of Mines  1977a).  Except for  gasoline additives,
 all other areas are expected to show modest growth.   Leaded gasoline
 additives are currently being phased out because  of the large amount  of
 airborne emissions from motor-powered vehicles.    Factors that could
 retard domestic growth in lead production  include shortage of skilled
 labor, energy shortages, environmental restrictions, and the  shortage of
 investment funds at moderate cost in a capital intensive industry.  The
 latter two may have significant impact.   Modifying  existing smelters  and
 refineries in order to comply with the new regulations established by the
 U.S. EPA and OSHA could cost the lead industry as much as  $650 million by
 1982 (Krammer 1978).   It is possible that  the stricter standards may
 force some producers to shut down their operations,  which will necessi-
 tate the importation of a greater volume of lead.

     Domestic reserves of high grade lead ore are primarily located in
Missouri (72.5% of domestic reserves).  The known worldwide reserves
 total 124 million kkg and are adequate to meet the world demand through
 the year 2000 (U.S.  Bureau of Mines 1977a).  A summary of the worldwide
 reserves is presented in Table 3-6.

 3.5  SUMMARY

     In 1976,  domestic mine production of lead was about 518,000 kkg.
 The total primary U.S.  smelter/refinery  production was 597.000 kkg
 (domestic plus imported ores),  while secondary production (scrap
 processing)  contributed 526,000 kkg to the U.S.  supply.  Approximately
 49% of the industrial supply was consumed in the manufacture of lead-
 acid storage batteries and the production of battery oxides.   About 14%
 of the supply was consumed for the production of antiknock gasoline
                                  3-12

-------
I
_                 TABLE 3-5.   U.S.  FORECASTS FOR LEAD DEMAND,  1976 and 2000

I
•         Production  (Demand
             Primary
•           Secondary
_         End Uses
™           Gasoline Additives
•           Transportation
             Construction
|           Paints
•           Ammunition
             Electrical
•           Other

•         Source:  U.S. Bureau of Mines (1977a).

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
1976
843,510
526,060
217,461
710,181
45,350
96,142
66,211
116,096
118,129
Forecast Range, 2000
934,210
616,760
36,280
1,106,540
45,350
81,630
54,420
63,430
90,700
2,122,380
1,251,660
181,400
2,31.2,850
136,050
154,190
136,050
181,400
272,100
Probable
1,333,290
780,020
72,560
1,514,690
63,490
117,910
81,630
136,050
126,980
3-13

-------
              TABLE 3-6.  SUMMARY OF WORLD LEAD RESERVES
North America
  United States
  Canada
  Mexico
  Other
          Total

South America
  Brazil
  Peru
  Other
          Total

Europe
  W. Germany
  Bulgaria
  Yugoslavia
  Spain
  Poland
  Sweden
  Other
          Total

Africa
  Morocco
  S.W. Africa
  Algeria
  S. Africa
  Other
          Total
                              Reserve
 25.8
 11.7
  4.1
	.!_
 42.3
  2.4
  3.2
  1.7
  7.3
  4.1
  2.7
  2.7
  3.0
  2.3
  2.3
  5.6
22.7
 1.4
 1.4
   .6
 5.1
 1.3
 9.8
                Other
45 = 9
18.2
 5.0
 1.1
70.2
 2.2
 4.1
 1.9
 8.2
 5.0
 2.7
 2.7
 3.4
 3.2
 1.4
 5.3
23.7
 1.4
 2.3
 2.1
 4.0
 2.4
12.2
              Total
 71.7
 29.9
  9.1
  1.8
112.5
  4.6
  7.3
  3.6
 15.5
  9.1
  5.4
  5.4
  6.4
  5.5
  3.7
 10.9
 46.4
  2.8
  3.7
  2.7
  9.1
  3.7
 22.0
Asia
  U.S.S.R.                      16.3
  Peoples Republic of China
  Iran                           1.8
  Other                          4.0
          Total                 24.8

Oceania:  Australia             17.1

          World Total          124.0
                16.3

                 1.8
                 3.3
                24.1

                14.7

               153.1
               32.6

                3.6
                7.3
               48.9

               31.7

              277.0
 pleasured and indicated.

 Includes inferred and hypothetical resources,
Source:  Kirk-Othmer (1967).

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 additives.  Other important use categories include red lead and litharge
 (5%), ammunition (4%), and solder (4%).  The remaining 15% is divided
 among eighteen use categories.  Each of the categories represents about
 1% or less of the total supply, while about 9% is contained in industry
 stocks.


      Of the identified releases of lead to the environment (355,000-
 360,000 kkg), about 53% was airborne and 46% was in the form of solid
 waste.  Less than 1% of the total releases was identified as being re-
 leased to surface waters or POTWs.


      Of the estimated 190,000 kkg of lead released to the atmosphere,
 93% was attributed to the use of gasoline antiknock additives.   These
 releases are widely distributed; however,  they are more concentrated in
 urban or heavily trafficked areas.  Approximately 2% of the identified
 releases was attributed to fossil fuel combustion,  and about  1% each to
 lead production,  battery manufacture,  copper and  zinc smelting,  and  iron
 and steel manufacture.


      The identified releases to the  aquatic environment are relatively
 low (800-950 kkg).   Of these,  53-63% was attributed to iron and steel"
 production, 21%  to lead production,  6% each to battery production and the
 nonferrous metal  industry,  and 4%  each to  the  inorganic chemical  and
 the pulp and paper  industries.   The  remaining  2%  of  identified  releases
 was attributed to  pigment  manufacture,  the  textile  industry, and  POTW
 discharges.


      Solid wastes  represent a  large  portion (165,000-168,000 kkg)  of the
 total releases of  lead to  the  environment.   Lead  production accounts  for
 a  large  portion  of  these releases  (34%)  as  well,  and  ammunition use  could
 account  for about 30%.   Other  important  sources include solder, weights
 and ballast, bearing metals, and iron  and steel production.


      There are numerous  uncertainties  in the materials  balance  for lead
 The releases  from  the  production,  use,  and  disposal of  lead-acid storage
 batteries  are largely  unknown,  although  this is the largest single use°
 of  lead.   In addition,  releases  from other  uses,  although minor, may  be
 significant.  The releases  from several  sources are largely unknown   or
 have  only  been roughly estimated;  however,  they may be  significant on a
 local  scale.  The lack of data  on which  to  estimate aquatic releases  in
 general  is  of concern.  Although they are likely  to be low when compared
 with  airborne releases and solid wastes, they may be significant on a
 local  scale.


     Urban runoff probably represents the major source to aquatic environ-
ment.  Estimates  are not shown in the materials balance (Table  3-1)
because these releases represent an indirect source of atmospheric
emissions.  However, this source may  represent as much as 21,000 kkg of
lead discharging  to surface waters and POTWs.
                                   3-15

-------
                               REFERENCES

 American Bureau of Metal Statistics.  Non-ferrous metal data.  New York
 NY:  American Bureau of Metal Statistics; 1978.                        '

 Bennett, E.R.;  Linstedt, K.D.; Nilsgard, V.; Battaglia, G.M.; Pontius, F.W.
 Urban snowmelt  — characteristics and treatment.  J. WPCF 53(1) -.119-125;
 X 7 O J. •


                             enVir°nment'  Essex' En§land:  Applied Science


 Kirk-Othmer.  Encyclopedia of chemical technology.   Vol.  12.  New York  NY-
 Interscience  Publications;  1967.                                       '  '   '

 Krammer,  L.   New EPA lead  standard could cost $650  million.   Washington
 Post;  October 1,  1978.

 Lead Industries  Association,  Inc.   U.S.  lead industry  1977  annual review.
 New York, NY:  Lead  Industries Association,  Inc.; 1978.

 Nriagu,  J.O.  The  biogeochemistry  of  lead in the environment.   Part A
 Amsterdam:  Elsevier; 1978.

 U.S. Bureau of Mines.  Mineral commodity  profiles.   Washington, DC:
 Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of  the  Interior; 1977a.

 U.S. Bureau of Mines.  Minerals yearbook  metals.  Vol. 1, Minerals and
 fuels.  Washington, DC:  Bureau of Mines. U.S. Department of  the  Interior;


 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (U.S. EPA).  Background  information
 for new source performance standards, primary copper, zinc, and lead
 smelters.  Vol.  1:  Proposed standards.   EPA 440/2-74-002a.  Washington,
 DC:  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1974.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (U.S. EPA).  Nationwide evaluation
of combined sewer overflows and urban stormwater discharges.  Vols  I and
 II.  EPA Report  No. 40 CFR 403.  Washington, DC:  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency; 1977.
                                   3-16

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
 I
I
I
I
I
           4.0  FATE AND DISTRIBUTION OF LEAD IN THE ENVIRONMENT
 4.1  INTRODUCTION


      This chapter describes the levels of lead that have been observed
 in the environment and the environmental pathways that may result in
 these levels.   Extensive data support these areas.  Here, however, only
 the major topics will be discussed,  including summaries of the available
 data.


 4.2  DISTRIBUTION OF LEAD IN THE ENVIRONMENT


     There  is a  large data base concerning  the  concentrations  of  lead
 in the  environment.   Nriagu (1978a,b)  and Chow  (1978)  have reviewed  the
 literature  extensively.   The following discussion is meant to  address
 the key points and  to briefly  review  concentrations of lead  that  are
 found in  the United  States.


 4.2.1   Water and Sediment


 4.2.1.1   Freshwater


     Patterson  (1965) estimated that  the background level in surface
 waters  during preindustrial times was  0.5 yg/1.   Current  global levels
 of lead in  water are 1-10 yg/1 (Livingston  1964).


     Anthropogenic  sources are industrial discharge, fallout,  washout,
 and runoff, with the primary source being lead  emitted to the  air  as  a
 result  of automobile use.   Fleischer  (1973)  has estimated that these
 anthropogenic sources account  for over 90%  of the lead in U.S. surface
 waters.


     Typical lead levels  in U.S. surface waters are less  than  25 yg/1.
 Lead concentrations  were detected  in  63% of the samples at a range from
 1-55 ug/1 with an average of 3.9 yg/1  in a  study  of 749 locations  (Durum
JL£. al.  1971) and Kopp (1969) reported  a mean concentration of  23 yg/1 in
 water sampled from 130 stations across the United  States.  This is a mean
 of  the  positive values and  lead was detected in 19% of the 1580 samples.)
 Bradford  (1971)  reported  an  average concentration  of 3 yg/1  in California
 surface waters (ranging  from <0.5 yg/1 to 25 yg/1).  Mathis  and Cummings
 (1973)  found a range  of  1-18 yg/1 in the Illinois  River and Mancy  (1971)
 reported a range of 0.6-3.3  yg/1 in the Great Lakes.   Levels of lead in
 surface waters and sediment  are summarized in Tables 4-1  and 4-2.


 4.2.1.2  Seawater


Seawater generally contains  low levels of lead.  Settle and Patterson (1980)
estimate that prehistoric lead levels in the ocean were 0.0005 ug/1 and  report
that present day levels are 0.005 yg/1.  For nearshore potentially contami-
nated waters, Patterson  (1974) reported levels of  0.014-0.08 ug/1 off the
Southern California coast.  Patterson _et _al. (1976) found similar results
on the east coast:  0.02-0.04 yg/1 in Georgia, and 0.14 ug/1 in the Long


                                  4-1

-------
                               TABLE  4-1.   CONCENTRATIONS  OF  LEAD IN WATER
             Description

 Background
 Global  level
 U.S.
 U.S.
 Stream  near  smelter —  MO
 Surface waters — CA
 Illinois River
 Great Lakes
 Rainwater — U.S. Urban
 Rainwater — CA Urban
 Rainwater — NH Rural
 Rainwater — NB
 Snow — NB Rural
 Seawater —  Background
 Seawater — Present day
 Nearshore contaminated  (CA)
 Nearshore contaminated  (GA)
Nearshore contaminated  (L.I. Sound)
Groundwater — MO
Groundwater — CA
Storm runoff — NC
Storm runoff
  ConceiU ja t i on
 Mean
   Range
   0.5

3.9
23
300
3


36
38
1-10
1-55
2-140

0.5-25
1-J8
0.6-3.3


  13.4
   4.3
   7.8
   0.0005
   0.005
   0.14
   3
1500
 5500
0.014-0.08
0.02-0.04

 2.9-3.8
 0.5-10
 ]00-]2,000
          jte_f erencei

 Patterson (1965)
 Livingston (1964
 Durum et  al.  (1971)
 Kopp  and  Kroner (1967), Kopp (1969)
 Gale  and  Wixson (1979)
 Bradford  (1971)
 Mathis and Cummings (1973)
 Mancy (1971)
 Lazarus et al.  (1970)
 Chow  and  Earl  (1970)
Schlesinger e^  al.  (1974)
Struempler (1976)
Struempler (1976)
Settle and Patterson (1980)
Settle and Patterson (1980)
Patterson  (1974)
Patterson et al. (1976)
Patterson ^t al. (1976)
Proctor £t ajL.   (1974)
Bradford  (1971)
Bryan  (1974)
Newton et al. (1974)

-------
                                    TABLE 4-2.  CONCENTRATIONS OF  LEAD  IN  SEDIMENT
u>
           Description

Coastal  sediment

California Coast — Surface

California Coast — Lower levels

Great Lakes — Surface

Great Lakes — Lower level

Wisconsin Lakes — Surface

Wisconsin Lakes — Lower level

River sediment

U.S. — 1973-79
 Concent rat uni
  Mean

   87

 30-50

   10

  109

   28

  918

   48.8

   23

27-267
                                                                      Range

                                                                      1-912
     Reference^

Nriagu  (1978a)

Chow jet ai_.  (1973)

Chow jat al.  (1973)
       b

       h

Fitchko and HutchJuson  (J975)

d.S. MI'A (1980)
        Thomas (1976), Edgington and Robbins (1976), Kemp and Dell (1976).
        Peterson (1973),  Iskander and Keeney (1974)

-------
 Island Sound, NY.  Both Patterson (1974) and Settle and Patterson  (1980)
 believe that most studies, before 1970, overstated the concentration  of
 lead in ocean water by as much as an order of magnitude.

 4.2.1.3  Rainfall

      In some situations, rainfall appears to contain relatively high
 levels of lead.  Lazarus e_t al. (1970) correlated the consumption of
 gasoline with concentrations of lead in rainwater collected nationally
 at 32 urban stations.   They found an average level of 36 ug/1, which
 agrees with a study by Chow and Earl (1970) that reported an average
 concentration of 38 ug/1 in rainwater collected at San Diego, CA.
 Schlesinger _et al.  (1974) measured lead concentrations in the precipita-
 tion of a rural area in New Hampshire.  Their measurements, an average
 of 13.4 ug/1,  showed lower levels than those found in urban settings.
 Struempler (1976) reported an even lower lead content, an average of
 4.3 ug/1,  in rainwater collected in rural areas of Nebraska in 1973;
 snowfalls  in the same  area were slightly higher, with a mean value of
 7.8 ug/1.

 4.2.1.4  Urban Runoff

      Extremely high levels of lead have been reported in urban runoff.
 Bryan (1974)  reported  levels in Durham,  NC  runoff,  ranging from 100 ug/1
 to 12,000  ug/1,  with an average of 1500 ug/1.   Newton and co-workers
 (1974)  compared levels up to 5500 ug/1 with a concentration of only
 90 ug/1 in an  open  field.   Although  these are unusually high levels for
 most water bodies,  Kopp and Kroner (1967) reported  levels  ranging  from
 80-200  ug/1 in the  Mississippi River.

 4.2.1.5  STORET  Data

      The STORET  Water  Quality  System contains a  large amount  of monitoring
 data  on lead.  Because  of  the  size of  the data base, only detectable  levels
 were  used  in the following  analysis.  These data comprise roughly 60%  of
 all  total  lead observations  for the period considered here —  1970-79.
 Thus, the mean values  discussed below are actually means of  the detected
 values.

      Lead concentrations in  ambient waters appear to have declined in  the
 United States since 1970.  Figure 4-1 illustrates the trend of lead con-
 centrations from 1970  to 1979.  From 1970 through 1973, mean  concentration
 decreased to 70  ug/1;  to date, it has fallen below 40 ug/1.   It is
 impossible  to say whether these results reflect an actual decline or
 change  in  analytical methodology or detection limits.

     To observe regional variations of lead concentrations, the data were
disaggregated to the major basin level.  Most major basins across the
country reported mean values >50 ug/1,  from 1970 to 1972; however,  in
                                   4-4

-------
   100

   90

   80

_  70

•3  60
5
1  50

§  40
5
0  30

   20


   10
                                                               Mean
       _L
                                            -L
 _L
JL
_L
1970    1971   1972   1973
                                     1974   1975

                                        Year
1976    1977   1978   1979
    FIGURE 4-1  MEAN AMBIENT VALUES OF LEAD CONCENTRATIONS
                IN U.S. SURFACE WATERS, 1970-79 (DETECTED LEVELS
                ONLY)
                             4-5

-------
 more recent years,  the conditions have altered.   Since 1973, mean values
 for major river basins in the East,  South and Midwest have been <50 ug/1.
 The higher concentrations of lead appear in the  western regions of the
 country,  specifically in the Pacific Northwest and California basins.
 In the Pacific Northwest basin,  mean concentrations,  from 1970 to 1973,
 fluctuated between  133-336 ug/1.   In 1976,  concentrations decreased,
 resulting in a mean value of 127 ug/l.   Mean levels have declined annu-
 ally since 1976 to  69 yg/1 in 1977,  to 61 ug/1 in 1978, and to 32 -g/1
 in 1979.   Similarly,  for the California basin, mean concentrations of
 lead in the early portion of the time period appeared in the range
 80-228 Ug/1.   A decline has occurred annually from a  mean level of
 105 uS/1  in 1976 to 43 ug/1 in 1979.

      The  literature indicates higher concentrations of lead near highways,
 in urban  areas,  and,  in general,  where traffic is heaviest.  Retrievals'
 from STORET were used to contrast urban and rural lead concentrations.
 Areas  in  the East,  Midwest,  and  West were selected and data were aggre-
 gated  by  county.

     Retrievals  from  STORET were  consistent with  the  literature.  Mean  lead
 concentrations  in counties  that  were mostly urban,  on the average,  were
 fifteen times  higher  than the mean concentrations of  rural counties.
 For instance,  in New  York,  the urban county of Nassau was contrasted
 with Madison and Steuben counties of upstate  New  York.   In Nassau county,
 mean concentrations were in  the  range of  13-65 ug/1,  with maximum levels
 from 37 to  300 ug/1.   In Madison  and  Steuben  counties,  the  mean  and
maximum concentrations  ranged  from undetected  to  14 ug/1  and undetected to
 37  ug/1,  respectively.   Similar  results appeared  for  Los  Angeles when
 contrasted  with  Fresno and Kern  counties  and  for  Cook county  (Chicago,  IL)
 contrasted  with  the rural counties of Livingston,  Shelby,  and  Whiteside.
 Table  4-3 presents  the urban  and  rural  lead concentration results.

 4.2.1.6   Lead  in Sediment

     In aquatic  environments,  lead is  found at much higher  concentrations
 in  the  sediment  than  in the water column.   In coastal sediment,  lead
 concentrations range  from 1 mg/kg to  912 mg/kg with a mean  value of
 87  mg/kg  (Nriagu 1978a).  The  highest  concentrations remain  in  the surface
 layer;  Chow et al.  (1973) reported an average  of  10 mg/kg in deep layers
 on  the  California coast  compared  with levels  of 30, 29, and 50 mg/kg on
the surface.  The average concentration for the Great Lakes was  109 mg/kg
at the surface and 28 mg/kg in the deeper layers  (Thomas  1976, Edgington
and Robbins 1976, Kemp and Dell 1976).  The mean concentrations  for a
sampling of lakes in Wisconsin were 918 mg/kg in the  surface layer and
49 mg/kg in the deeper layers  (Peterson 1973, Iskander and Keeney 1974).
The surface layers appear to contain three to five times  the concentration
of lead as deeper layers  (see Table 4-2).

     Fitchko and Hutchinson (1975) have estimated the average concentra-
tion of lead in river sediments to be 23 mg/kg.  Nriagu ("19783) has
                                  4-6

-------
       TABLE 4-3.  MEAN AND MAXIMUM RANGES OF LEAD CONCENTRATIONS
                   IN AMBIENT SURFACE WATERS OF URBAN AND RURAL AREAS
 Urban/Rural Counties
 East - New York
   Nassau (urban)
   Madison (rural)
   Steuben (urban/rural)
 Midwest - Illinois
   Cook (urban
   Livingston  (rural)
   Shelby (rural)
   Whiteside  (urban/rural)
 West -  California
   Los  Angeles  (urban)
   Fresno  (urban/rural)
   Kern  (urban/rural)
                                         Concentrations  (ug/1)'
                       Maximum Range
                          37-300
                          ND-4
                           4-37
                          20-1700
                          ND-40
                         ND-10
                          10-20
                        178-2400
                         ND-370
                          1-45
Mean Range
   13-65
   ND-3
    2-14
   15-71
   ND-8
   ND-1
    1-5
   53-309
   ND-89
   1-29
Note:  ND
a
not detected.
  Ranges generally include detectable levels only, except where ND is
  indicated.
Source:  U.S.  EPA (1980).
                                  4-7

-------
 estimated lead levels in polluted environments at about four times this
 value, 98 tag/kg.

      In the STORE! data base, lead concentrations in sediment have been
 recorded in only  one-third of the major river basins, mainly in the East
 and Midwest.   Over a 7-year period,  1973-79, maximum concentrations of
 lead in sediment  ranged from 440-1000 mg/kg and mean concentrations
 from 27-267 mg/kg.  In general,  lead concentrations in sediment are two
 to three orders of magnitude higher  than lead concentrations in ambient
 waters (U.S.  EPA  1980).

 4.2.2  Air

      Nriagu (1978b) has an extensive  discussion on the levels and forms
 of lead in the atmosphere;  thus,  they will only be discussed briefly
 here.

      Background lead levels  are  present in the atmosphere  (Table 4-4)
 as the result  of  releases from natural sources,  including  windblown dust,
 plant exudates, forest fires, vulcanism and radioactive  decay (Nriagu
 1978b).  Using  geochemical evidence,  Patterson (1965)  estimated  the pre-
 industrial levels  of lead in the  atmosphere to be approximately  0.6 ng/m3.
 This  figure is  an  order  of magnitude lower than the'lowest level reported'
 for the  continental  United States  (8  ng/m3).   Chow et. al.  (1972)  reported
 this level  at  3800 meters at a relatively  uninhabited site.   The  range  of
 lead levels for remote areas of the  continental United States is
 0.1-10 ng/m-> (Nriagu  1978b).

     According  to Nriagu  (I978b), lead  released to  the atmosphere  by
 natural  sources accounts  for only a small  percentage, approximately 4%,
 with the remaining 96% accounted for by anthropogenic sources.   In air,'
 the primary anthropogenic sources of lead  are  internal combustion  engines,
 lead smelting, and steel production.

     Lead  concentrations  are greater in urban  or more developed areas.
 Nriagu (1978b) reported an average range of  0.5-10  ug/m3 in the developed
 areas, 0.1-1 ug/mj in more rural areas, and <0.01  ug/m3 in locations
 distant  from developed areas.  Measurements of concentrations in  the
 immediate vicinity of traffic movement were usually found  to exceed
 10 ug/m  .  For the United States, urban lead concentrations ranged  from
 a  relatively low level of 0.14 yg/m3 reported  for Los Alamos by Tepper
 and Levin  (1972) to a high of 7.5 ug/m3 reported in mid-Manhattan by Chow
 (1973).  Data collected in the U.S. EPA's National Air Sampling Net-
work (NASN), during 1966 and 1967, showed average urban levels of
 1.1 ug/m-3.  Nonurban areas averaged 0.21 yg/m3 near the city, .096 yg/m3
 at increasing distances from cities,  and 0.022 yg/m3 in remote rural
 areas (McMullen et al. 1970).  These  data indicate an average urban
 level almost ten times higher than concentrations found in rural settings.

     The correlation between atmospheric lead concentrations and auto-
mobile usage is supported by data indicating increased levels paralleling
                                  4-8

-------
                         TABLE  4-4.  CONCENTRATIONS  OF  LKA1) IN  TliE ATMOSPHERE
             Description

 Baseline-preIndus trial

 Lowest  level —  Continental U.S.
    (White Mountains, CA)

 Global  — Urban

 Global  — Rural

 Global  — Remote

 Boston  — Spring

 Boston  — Winter

Montana — Near smelter

Montana — Distant from smelter

Idaho — Near smelter
                                             Concentration (jig/m )
 0.0006

 0.008
3.9

5.4
                         0.5-10

                         0.1-1

                      0.0001-0.01
147.9
                         0.4-4

                         0.1-0.7

                        60-254
    Reference

Patterson  (1965)

Chow et  uj.  (1972)


Nriagu (1978b)

Nriagu (I978b)

Nriagu (1978b)

O'Brien et ;U.  (1975)

O'Brien et al.  (1975)

U.S. EPA (1972)

U.S. EPA (1972)

Rayaini e^t al.  (1977)

-------
 increases  in gas  consumption.  Chow  (1973)  examined  both  the  1961-1962
 Tri-City Project  conducted  in Los Angeles,  Philadelphia and Cincinnati
 and the 1968-1969 Seven-Cities Project  conducted  in  the above cities
 and additionally New York,  Chicago,  Houston, and  Washington,  DC,  and
 found significant increases in lead  concentrations over that  time period.
 Los Angeles had the highest increase,  56%,  with smaller increases of
 19% in Philadelphia and 17% in Cincinnati.

     Seasonal trends  in atmospheric lead levels  based on both automobile
 usage patterns and climate  conditions are also discussed  in the literature.
 A 1972 study by O'Brien eg  al. (1975) shows a variation from  3.9  yg/m
 in the spring to 5^.4 yg/m   in the winter in Boston.   Colucci  ej^ al.   (1969)
 reported 4.9 ug/m  in the spring and 10.3 yg/m  in winter in  the~960-65
 Los Angeles Study.  These studies indicate a possible average seasonal
 variation of over 50%.

     A large proportion of  lead emitted in automobile exhaust settles
 quickly in the vicinity of  the source.  Nriagu (1978b) states  that  lead
 levels in  the atmosphere generally decrease by about  50%  between  10 and
 50 meters from highways.  Lead concentrations also decrease sharply with
 increased height from the street level.  Schroeder (1974) reported levels
 of 14.3 yg/m3 at 0.61 meter,  8.3 ug/tn3 at 1.5 meters, and 5.1  yg/m3  at
 0.2 meter.

     In addition to the impact of automobiles in  urban areas,  local
 point sources also contribute to levels of lead in the atmosphere.  The
 U.S. EPA (1972) measured lead levels in East Helena, Ml,  which  contains
 an industrial smelter complex; in 1969, concentrations ranged from
 0.4-4 yg/m3 depending on the distance from the plant.  The maximum daily
 concentration was 15 yg/m3.   In neighboring Helena, MT, in 1969,  an
 average daily concentration of 0.1 yg/m3 up to a  maximum  of 0.7 yg/m3
 was reported.   In 1976, Ragaini and  co-workers (1977) conducted a study
 in Kellogg, ID, near a lead smelting complex.  Air samples taken  at the
 town hall ranged from 60-254 yg/m3, with a mean value of  147.9  yg/m3.

 4.2.3  Soil

     All soils contain detectable levels of lead,  ranging in  concentra-
 tion from <1 mg/kg to >100,000 mg/kg (10%) in lead ores.   Averages in
 the literature range from 10 mg/kg (Bowen 1966) to 37 mg/kg (Cholak e_t^ al.
 1961)  for uncontaminated soils (see Table 4-5).  For an average of all
 soils in the United States,  Warren ^t al. (1971)  estimated a  lead content
 of 20 mg/kg.  DeTreville (1964)  presents data indicating  a concentration
 of 16 mg/kg for the earth's crust, but with values as low as  0.04 mg/kg
 in alluvial soil.   In an estimate derived from surveys of the literature,
Nriagu (1978a)  reported an average concentration  of 18 mg/kg  for  the
 United States.   The natural sources  that contribute to this background
 level include weathering of rocks, volcanoes, and erosion of  ore deposits.

     Like lead in the atmosphere, the majority of anthropogenic lead in
 the soil results from the deposition of lead emitted from the combustion
 of leaded gasoline and, to a lesser degree,  the emissions from industrial


                                   4-10

-------
                             TABLE 4-5.  CONCENTRATIONS OF LEAD  IN  SOIL
               Description

Uncontaminated soil
Earth's crust
All U.S. soils
All U.S. soils
Chicago Expressway — <13.7miles
Chicago Expressway — 46 miles
Street dust
Dust — residential areas (IL)
Dust — commercial areas (IL)
U.S. city dust — residential
U.S. city dust — commercial
Urban soil — U.S. cities
Montana — 1 mile from smelter
Montana — 2 miles from smelter
Montana — 4 miles from smelter
Idaho smelter — .7-12 miles
Soil in vicinity of a barn
Soil in vicinity of a wooden house
Cincinnati house
Old house
Orchard soil — no pesticides
Orchard soil — pesticides with lead
  Concen trat' on  (m^/kg)	
 Mean             Range
  10-37
  16
  20
  18
 555
1636
2413
 523
4000
 600
 100

2000
Minimum-.04
Max!mum-7600
Maximum-yOO

  656-3067
 1774-3549
   99-834
  300-7600

  450-6338
   32-7620
  440-490
    3-76
    7-360
         Reference

Bowen  (1966),  Cholak  et  ;il.  (1961)
DeTreville  (1964)
Warren vt al.  (1971)
Nriagu (1978a)
Kahn et al.  (1973)

Rameati (1973)
Schroeder (1974)
Schroeder (1974)
NAS (1972)
NAS (1972)
Chow et al.  (1975)
U.S. EPA (1972)
U.S. EPA (1972)
U.S. EPA (1972)
Ragaini _et al.  (1977)
Ter Haar and Aronow (1974)
Ter Haar and Aronow (1974)
Bertinson and Clark (1973)
Bogden and Louria (1975)
Chisolm and Bishop (1967)
Chisolm and Bishop (1967)

-------
 activities,  such as  lead smelting.   A 40-year study of soils in areas
 of high traffic  (Page and Ganje 1970) showed an increase in lead concen-
 tration from 17  mg/kg to over 50 mg/kg in 1968.   Kahn and co-workers
 (1973)  reported  levels of lead in soil along a Chicago expressway as high
 as 7600 mg/kg at distances <13.7 meters from the highway and 900 mg/kg
 as far  away  as 46 meters.   Before the use of automobiles, Nriagu (1978a)
 theorizes  that the primary source of lead contamination was flue dust
 created by burning coal.

      Lead  in urban soils tends to be somewhat lower than that found in
 the immediate vicinity of highways.   In a sample of nine U.S. cities,
 Chow _et al.  (1975) reported soil levels in inner city parks ranged from
 99 mg/kg in  a Houston park to 834 mg/kg in New York's Central Park.
 As a result  of sampling 16 sites,  the average concentration for these
 cities  was 523 mg/kg.

      High  levels  of  lead are  also found in urban dust.   Sartor and Boyd
 (1972)  found the  following lead  concentrations in dust  from various
 sites:   industrial (840 mg/kg),  residential (1100 mg/kg),  and commercial
 (1400 mg/kg).  Rameau (1973)  observed that the mean lead content of
 street  dust  was  555  mg/kg,with 90% consisting of particles  <250 y.
 Although these are fairly  wide ranges of  concentrations,  all city dust
 contains relatively  high  levels  of lead,  with residential  areas lower
 than  commercial  areas.   Schroeder (1974)  reported 656-3067  mg/kg for
 residential  areas, and  1774-3549  mg/kg  for commercial areas in nine
 Illinois cities.   Similar  studies were  conducted in several states.
 With  the exception of Virginia and Kentucky,  the average  level of con-
 centration in commercial areas is almost  double  the residential level.
 NAS  (1972) compared  77  cities  in  the  United  States  and  found levels of
 1636 mg/kg at  residential  sites  compared  with 2413  mg/kg  at commercial
 sites.

     Although  many authors have noted a decrease in the  soil concentra-
 tion of  lead with increasing  distances  from  the  roadway  (Nriagu 1978a),
 lead concentration also appears  to decrease with increasing depth in
 soil.  Numerous authors, including Tolonen (1974),  Ward ^t.  aj.  (1975),
 and Rolfe and  Haney  (1975), have  reported  that lead  concentrations above
 background levels are uncommon below  a depth  of  10  centimeters.

     Although  the effects  of automobile exhaust  have  a wide  national
 impact,  point  source lead  can  produce extremely  high  local  lead  concen-
 trations.  Lead smelting operations probably  have the most  significant
 impacts on nearby soils.   In Helena,  MT,  the  U.S. EPA (1972)  reported
 concentrations of 4000, 600, and  100 mg/kg of  lead  at distances  of 1,
 2, and 4 miles from a nearby smelter.  Ragaini and  co-workers  (1977)
 studied a lead mining and  smelting operation  near the town  of Kellogg, ID,
where the majority of ambient  lead originated  in airborne emissions from
 the complex.   One of the highest concentrations  in  the soil,  7600 mg/kg,
was at the site closest to the complex, 0.7 mile,  with other  site
 observations  varying from a fairly high reading  of  2200 mg/kg  12 miles
 away to 300 mg/kg at a site 5 miles away.  Unlike lead from  automobile
                                 4-12

-------
 exhausts,  the  data  show  that  smelter  emissions  affect areas up to
 25 kilometers  away  (Bolter _e_t al.  1975,  Koirtjohann _et al.  1975).

      Soil  samples in  the vicinity  of  lead-painted houses  have been found
 to contain significant lead concentrations.   Ter Haar and Aronow (1974)
 reported soil  levels  ranging  from  450-6338 mg/kg next to  a  wooden house
 in Michigan and  2000  mg/kg near a  Massachusetts  barn.   Bertinson and
 Clark (1973) reported lead levels  ranging from  32-7620 mg/kg in the
 soil  around a  nineteenth century house in Cincinnati,  and Bogden and
 Louria  (1975)  found levels, averaging  175 mg/kg  before and 440-490 mg/kg
 after paint removal,  in  the soil surrounding  an  old lead-painted house.

      Chisolm and Bishop  (1967) have demonstrated the  consequences of
 using pesticides containing lead;  lead levels of 7-360 mg/kg were found
 in orchard soils compared with levels of 3-76 mg/kg in adjacent
 nonorchard soils.

 4.2.4 Biota

      Numerous  authors have shown that lead concentrations in biota
 correlate  with the concentration of lead in the  surrounding environment.
 Thus, background levels for biota  are related to those previously
 described  for  soil, water, and the atmosphere.   In  a  study  of  pine
 needles in North America, Elias and co-workers  (1976)  reported  lead
 concentrations of 10  yg/kg.   It is believed that one-half of these
 concentrations comes  from natural  sources.  Smith  (1973)  reported that
 grass growing  in a relatively unpolluted environment  contained   lead
 levels of  -1-5 mg/kg.   In an  extensive study of  naturally-occurring
 levels of  lead in bird tissues, Bagley and Locke (1967) found concen-
 trations in the range of 0.5-3.7 mg/kg.  Settle  and Patterson  (1980)
 have  estimated that natural lead levels in tuna, during prehistoric
 times, was  -.03 yg/kg.  Studies of current effects  of  lead  pollution
 have  shown  concentrations of  lead  in the biota at over  900  times  these
 baseline levels (Settle and Patterson 1980).

     A summary of selected levels of lead found  in biota is  contained
 in Table 4-6.   In general, elevated levels are found near highways and
 point sources,  such as smelters;  in areas where  lead-containing pesti-
 cides have been used;  and in  terrestrial birds that have consumed lead
 shot .

 4.2.5  Limitations of Monitoring  Data

      In the evaluation of the monitoring data previously discussed, the
 results of Settle and Patterson (1980) must also be considered.  These
 data show that  background levels  of lead, especially in tuna, have been
overestimated  by as much  as a factor of 1000.   These authors suggest
 that overestimates have occurred  as a result of  contamination in sample
 collections and analyses.  Thus,   the  data  presented in the  previous
                                   4-13

-------
                              TABLE 4-6.  CONCENTRATIONS OF LEAD IN BIOTA
Description
  Vegetation
    Background level - pine needles
    Grass
    Trees,  shrubs,  twigs -- Southeast
    Leaves  — Southeast
    Salt marsh-cordgrass — MA
    Marsh plants — dredge-spoil site
    Leaf litter ~  MO (lead smelter)
    Grass — ID (smelter)
    Vegetables -- MO (lead belt)
    Vegetables — control counties
    Vegetables — NJ (9 meters from road)
    Vegetables — SJ (76 meters from  road)

  Terrestrial Aniaals
    Insects  — high traffic volume
    Insects  — low  traffic volume
    Insects  — high traffic volume
    Insects  — low  traffic volume
    Earthworms — 3-48  meters  from  road
    Voles &  mice  —  lead treated orchards  (liver)
                 —  untreated  areas
    Background level  —  birds
    Duck wings
    Woodcocks  —  U.S.

 Aquatic Animals
    Albacore,  tuna,  muscle  (prehistoric period)
    Albacore,  tuna,  muscle  (present day)
    Gastropods — CA
    Mo Husks — CA
    Oysters — East Coast
    New tailings ponds — MO (crayfish)
    New tailings ponds — MO (snails)
    Fish —  NY  (lakes and streams)
    Trout — Cayuga Lake
    River fish - MT
                                                        Concentration  (mg/kg)
   Mean
  0.01
154
 70
  6.2
 17
  3.8
  8.6
  1.7
23.4
-4
12.63
 0.00003
 0.0003
                  Ranee
    1-5
  <10-3000
  < 10-2000
  5.4-23.2

4,379-39,636
  320-10,000
   8.8-114
    < 5-20.6
  18-1742
   8-212
                                        Reference
                52.7-270
   0.5-3.7
   0.5-361
   4.51-29.79
  .3-1.5
                                                      3.85
  2.6-11.8
  2.2-931
  0.67-0.88
 28-69
 39-116
 Max. 3
  0.004-0.02
 Elias _ejt al. (1976)
 Smith (1973)
 Connor and Shacklette  (1975)
 Connor and Shacklette  (1975)
 Banus £t al. (1974)
 Drifmeyer and Odum (1975)
 Gale and Wixson (1979)
 Ragaini et_ al.  (1977)
 Hemphill zt_ al.  (1971)
 Hemphill £t al.  (1971)
 Motto ejc al.  (1970)
 Motto e£ al.  (1970)
 Price  et  al.  (1974)
 Price  et  al.  (1974)
 Giles  et  al.  (1973)
 Giles  et  al.  (1973)
 Gish and  Christensen (1973)

 Elfving et  al.  (1978)
 Bagley and  Locke  (1967)
 U.S. DI (1979)
 Scanlon sit  al.  (1978)
Settle and Patterson  (1980)
Settle and Patterson  (1980)
Schwimer  (1973)
Graham (1972)
Kopfler and Mayer  (1973)
Gale et al. (1973)
Gale et al. (1973)
Pakkala e£ al.  (1972)
Tong et al. (1974)
Pagenkopf and Neuman  (1974)
                                                 4-14

-------
sections, related to background or control values, should be viewed
with caution.

4.3  Fate of Lead in the Environment

4.3.1  Introduction

     This discussion on the fate of lead in the environment is based on
the results of discharges from processes that have been identified as
significant contributors of lead to the environment  (see Chapter  3.0).
Emphasis is on the form of lead and its subsequent transport when
released to the environment.  Versar,  Inc.  (1979)  has conducted a general
overview of the environmental chemistry of lead, which has been used
in  the formulation of judgments concerning the direction and rate of
transport lead assumes in an ecosystem.  The literature available also
supports these observations.

     The major pathways of physical transport and qualitative rates of
transport are designated in Figure 4-2.  Atmospheric emissions (Pathway --1)
include point sources, such as lead production, incineration, smelting,
and coal combustion, that contribute to localized pollution; and dispersive
sources, such as automobile exhausts, that contribute to the concentra-
tions of lead found in urban air, urban dirt and dust, and urban runoff.
Pathway #2 follows the flow of lead that originates from solid waste
disposal areas and mine tailings.  Because environmental controls may
restrain further discharges to air and water, the quantity of lead dis-
posed to land surfaces can be expected to increase.  Lead discharges
contained within industrial process effluents into local surface waters
is reviewed in Pathway #3.  The fate of lead in POTWs is described in
Pathway ??4.

     A more general overview of all major pathways of anthropogenic
sources of lead is shown in Figure 4-3.  The major effect on the air
compartment, which is the migration of groundwaters containing lead to
nearby surface waters, has not been shown in this figure because:
(1) the process is extremely slow, and (2) the current magnitude of this
transport pathway is not sufficiently documented.   In addition, the high
concentration of lead in sediments with respect to the overlying water
and the steep profile of lead concentrations in soils subject to con-
tamination is not represented in this figure.

     The following discussion is divided into two major sections:
(1) 4.3.2, General Fate Processes, which discusses the fate of lead in
its various forms when it reaches the air, water,  or soil; and
(2) 4.3.3, Major Environmental Pathways, which discusses the fate of
lead as a result of specific sources.

4.3.2  General Fate Processes

4.3.2.1  Atmospheric Transport

     The atmospheric transport of lead depends on particle size,  the
height of the release,  geographical distribution,  and the chemical form
                                  4-15

-------
 Pathway No.
      1.
 I
M
O\
Atmospheric Emissions
                    Pb Production
                    Iron and Steel Production
                    Fossil Fuel Combustion
                    Zinc and Copper Smelting
                    Iron and Steel Production
                    Automobile Emissions
                    Solder Use
Local
Soil Surfaces
                  Solid Waste and Tailings
                   Primary Pb Production
                   Ammunition
                   Solder Use
                   House Paint
                   Weights and Ballast
                   Bearing Metals
                   Iron and Steel Production
                   Copper and Zinc Smelting
                                                                                           Dissolved Solids
                                                                                           Susp. Sediment
                                                   FIGURE 4-2  MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL PATHWAYS OF LEAD EMISSIONS

-------


Aqueous Discharges _




Treatment System
Iron and Steel Production
Lead Production
Coal Mining
Pulp and Paper Industries
Nnnfprrnii<; Mptalc
^-



i
Effluent


\)

Hazardous/Solid
Waste Dump
X

m
POTW

Pathway # 4
' Surface Water (
1 Sediments
Slow
—
Ground Water
^ Oceans

S
<&
-C-
I
1
POTW Primary
Influent Treatment
\
	 ^_
\,

Biological
Treatment
*
Sludge

Effluent
Ocean Dumping
Incin-
eration
lan.llill
1 	 ^~
Air
Soil

	 »•-
Slow
|
Surface Waters '
Sediments '
>
t.
Ground Water



S
^
                                 FIGURE 4-2   MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL PATHWAYS OF LEAD EMISSIONS  (Continued)

-------
           Automobile
           Emissions
           of Lead
                                   Washout
                                   Dry Fallout   ^yv
                                   to Water        N/S.
Washout and
Dry Fallout
to Land
                                                                    Oceans and
                                                                    Ocean Sediments
              Surface Waters
                        •M
                        [POTW
            Other Anthropogenic
            Sources of Lead
                                                   Land
                                                     Surface Soils
                                                     Tailing Piles
                                                     Landfills, etc.
     Note:  Quantities of lead moving in each pathway are roughly proportional
           to the thickness of each pathway shown. Slow movement from
           ground waters to surface waters is not shown.
FIGURE 4-3  SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF MAJOR PATHWAYS OF ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCES OF
             LEAD RELEASED TO THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 1976
                                       4-18

-------
 of lead emitted.   Although all these processes are significant, the
 chemical form probably has the least effect on transport and deposition.
 Larger particles,  particularly >20 ym in aerodynamic diameter, are
 rapidly deposited.   Atmospheric turbulence predominantly controls the
 deposition of particles <20 ym, by "forcing" the particles to the surface
 where they are deposited by impaction.   Atmospheric parameters control
 the deposition velocity for particles <20 Mm (deposition flux/air con-
 centration),  which is relatively independent of particle size and ranges
 from 0.1 to 10 cm/sec.   The deposition  velocity for a 20-Mm particle
 ranges from 2 to 10 cm/sec,  while particles  >50 ym settle at velocities
 >10 cm/sec (Sehmel  and  Hodgson 1976).

      The initial height of release is  another significant factor in the
 determination of the distribution of airborne lead and its deposition
 patterns.   Particles released near ground level are more likely to
 contribute to high  ground level concentrations, x^hich lead to human
 exposure,  and are more  likely to be deposited by impaction,  which leads
 to deposition patterns  that decay rapidly with distance from the source,
 such as  those observed  near highways and ore mines.   It is much less
 likely that turbulent processes will bring particles released from
 elevated sources (particularly with diameters <20 ym)  to ground level;
 thus,  they will be  dispersed over greater distances  and will most  likely
 be brought to the ground  by precipitation with more  widespread  impacts.
 This is  to be expected  for smelter and  coal  emissions.

      The geographical distribution further distinguishes  the  major
 source type.   Although  a  considerably smaller source than automotive
 emissions  on  the national scale,  ore mining,  milling,  and smeltering are
 concentrated  in a few isolated major sources.   This  has led  to  acute
 localized  impacts on isolated ecosystems.  Automotive  emissions  distri-
 buted  along every major thoroughfare may  lead to  lower  resultant concen-
 trations but  a much  greater  risk  of  exposure  to lead.

     Finally,  the chemical  form of  emitted particulates  can affect
 deposition; lead sulfates  and  nitrates  tend  to  be hygroscopic and may
 preferentially be rained  out  by  in-cloud  scavenging  processes.  Other-
 wise,  the  chemical form of a  particulate  is unlikely to affect  its
 atmospheric transport and deposition.

 4.3.2.2  Fate Processes in Aquatic Environments

     Because  the aqueous environmental chemistry of  lead has been
 extensively discussed by Rickard and Nriagu  (1978), only a brief
 discussion will be contained here. •

     Aqueous Complexation

     The concentration of soluble lead in water is directly related  to
parameters, such as pH,  the oxidizing potential of the water  (indicated
as pE), the presence of competing ions (Ca^, Mg4^, Fe"^), and the
existence of precipitating and complexing agents.  According to the
                                  4-19

-------
 model calculation  of  Vuceta and  Morgan (1978),  who used input parameters
 that  simulated  an  aerated  freshwater system,  Pb(II)  is  present as the
 free  metal  ion  below  pH  7.1 and  complexed with  carbonate ion above that
 pH.   Adsorption and complexation with hydroxide ions account for the
 remaining lead  in  the water column.   Lead is  strongly complexed by organic
 acids,  such as  huraic  and fulvic  acids (Rickard  and Nriagu 1978).   Again,
 pH  controls the equilibrium of complexation:  at  pH  3.5,  the log of"the*
 equilibrium constant  (log  K)  is  3.09,  while at  pH 5  the tendency to com-
 plex  with fulvic acids increases as  indicated by  a log  K of  6.13.   At
 this  pH, lead is exceeded  only by copper in its ability to complex with
 organic acids.   In interstitial waters, ^80%  of the  total lead may be
 found complexed to organic  molecules  (Rickard and Nriagu  1978).

      Sediment Adsorption

      In natural freshwater  systems,  lead will be  sorbed onto clay prefer-
 entially over calcium and  potassium  ions, with  the tendency  for sorption
 decreasing  in the  following order:   kaolinite >illite >montmorillonite
 (Nriagu 1978a).  Various parameters,  such as surface  area  and the  crystal
 type, dictate the adsorption  of  lead  onto hydrous  iron  and manganese
 oxides.  Although hydrous  iron and manganese  oxides  exert less control
 over  lead than  clays  and organic matter, lead is  strongly adsorbed in
 comparison  with  other trace metals.   Figure 4-4 indicates that lead is
 exceeded only by copper in  its ability to be  sorbed  by  silica  and  hydrous
 oxides  (Vuceta  and Morgan 1978).   Adsorption  to these surfaces is  essen-
 tially  irreversible; Rickard- and Nriagu (1978) suggest  the following
mechanism:
                 i /^
               Pb    +  Mn02  +  H20	^PbMnO  (OH)  +  H+

                                              (quenselite)

               Pb+2  +  Fe(OH)3	»-PbFeO(OH)2 + H+

                                          (amorphous)

      Serne  (1977) conducted several extraction techniques on the sedi-
ments of the San Francisco Bay.   His results  indicated that  45% of  the
 lead was associated with organic matter and sulfides; 50% of the lead
was inert to chemical attack, within clay lattices;  the remaining  5% of
 the lead in the sediments was associated with iron and manganese oxides.

     Transport of Lead in the Water Column

     Perhac (1974)  studied three  streams in Tennessee to ascertain  the
nature of trace metal transportation.  He found that lead was highly
concentrated in suspended solids.  Because  the suspended solids were
such a small percentage of the total solids  in the water column, however,
the bulk of the lead was  transported in the  dissolved state.   Table 4-7
is a summary of these findings.
                                 4-20

-------
                                          10
    Note:  (pH = 7, pE = 12, pC02 = 10"8-5 atm., pCt-4.16)
           as a function of surface area of SiC^ in ha/?.
           pS = -log(Si02)ha/£.

    Source:  Vuceta and Morgan (1978).
FIGURE 4-4  ADSORPTION OF HEAVY METALS IN
             OXIDIZING FRESH WATERS
                   4-21

-------
              TABLE  4-7.   CONCENTRATION  AND  DISTRIBUTION
                          OF  LEAD  IN THE WATER COLUMN
                            Concentration  % of Mass in the  % of Pb  in
                             Pb  (mg/kg)

Water column

Dissolved solids

Colloidal solids

Coarse particulates

Sediments



 these numbers are averages of 6 sites, and thus do not add to 100%.


Source:   Perhac (1974).
0.015
83
1683
278
74.5
•--— — — — W.A. u*t*«* * * t*L U- ^ J. \jWiUlUH
94.6 90.8
0.17 1.2
8.96 8.0
—
                                 4-22

-------
      Aquatic Biological Pathways

      Natural levels of lead are commonly found in freshwater ecosystems
 and less commonly in marine systems.  The metal does not appear  to be  an
 essential nutrient; however, it is present at background levels  in
 organisms living in relatively nonpolluted areas.  Most studies  report
 tissue concentrations of lead measured in the environment without the
 specifications of the water concentrations that lead to these levels.
 These are described in Section 4.2.  The subject of lead bioaccumulation
 has been discussed in detail by Bell et al.  (1978),  Phillips and Russo
 (1978),  and Wong _et .al.  (1978).  The mechanism of bioaccumulation and
 the parameters that influence it are described briefly in the following
 section.

           Parameters Affecting Uptake

      The potential routes  for exposure to and uptake of lead by aquatic
 organisms are ingestion  and absorption across the derma and respiratory
 organs.   For invertebrate  filter-feeders,  ingestion  of suspended parti-
 culate matter that contain adsorbed or complexed  lead is an important
 route (Armstrong and Atkins 1950).   For higher trophic level species,
 ingestion of detritus vegetation and other animals contaminated  with
 lead is  an important route (Bowen and Sutton  1951).   Because of  the
 high lead concentrations associated with fish,  for them,  ingestion of
 crustaceans  may  be an important source (Hardisty  et  al.  1974).   Several
 physiological processes may be  involved  in complexation of  the  lead with
 organic molecules  (Schubert 1954),  incorporation  of  lead  ions  (Williams
 1953,  Lehninger  1970), and uptake  by exchange  (Korninga  1952).

      Several parameters, both biological and  environmental,  influence
 bioaccumulation  of  lead.   Even  under uniform  exposure  conditions,
 variability  between  species is  important  (Wong et al.  1978); however,
 more controlled  assays are  needed  to determine its significance.   In
 certain fish, bioaccumulation decreases with age, although  it may be  a
 result of  the consumption  of a  lower  fraction of zooplankton by younger
 fish (Schell jet  al.  1974).   The calcium  status of the  exposed indivi-
 dual also  influences uptake and  retention of lead, which is reduced with
 increased  Ca availability  (Varanasi  and Gmur 1978).  In estuarine  fish,
 the  lead concentration in water, duration of exposure, temperature, and
water salinity affect bioaccumulation  (Sommers et_ al. 1976).

          Bioconcentration  Factors  (BCF) and Biological Half-lives

     Lead bioaccumulation levels and bioconcentration factors (concen-
tration in tissue/concentration in medium) are presented in Table 4-8
for a variety of fresh and marine aquatic species, both invertebrates
and vertebrates.   The studies were conducted under a wide range of
conditions and are not strictly comparable.   Most organisms were exposed
to lead dissolved in water; however, a few studies exposed species to
suspended particulate lead or to contaminated sediment.  In some cases,
lead concentrations were  measured in specific organs  rather than in the
                                   4-23

-------
              TABLE 4-8.   LEAD BIOACCUMULATION LEVELS AND BIOCONCENTRATION
                          FACTORS IN AQUATIC SPECIES

Species
Oysters (Crassostrea
Virginia)
it
Freshwater Clams
(6spp. )
Freshwater Clams
(8 spp.)
Mussel (Mytillus
galloprovincialis)
6 Invertebrate
Species
Brook Trout
(Salvelinus fontinalis)
Brook Trout
Brook Trout
Coho Salmon
(Oncorhynchus kisutch)


Coho Salmon
(Oncorhynchus kisutch)
Fish (Gillichthys
mir ab ilis)

Water Con-
centration
(ug/1)
0.5-3.0
(Mobile, AL)
25-200
5.2-89.6
g/g (sedi-
ment) 0.021
(water)
(sediment in
Mississippi)
0.29-2.15 ng/g
particulate
lead suspended
in water
32.0-565.0
119.0
3.0
12.0
0.21
lab


150
38
Tissue Con-
centration BCF
(mg/kg) (Approximate)
0.67-0.88a 200-1760
9-1153 4600
(muscle)
28-368 147203
(liver)
up to 48b
(body)
lla
3.9-9.5b 4400-13400
up to 500b 1000-9000
68b (liver) 570
215b (kidney) 1800
4.2b (liver) 1400
56. Ob (liver) 4600
1.4b (muscle) 100
68b 300
(gills)
50 (kidney) 200
10b (liver) 50
1.5 (gills) 10
0.4 (liver) 4
22b (gills) 580

Reference
Kopfler and Maver
(1973)
Pringle at al.
(196S)
Anderson (1978)
Price and Knight
(1978)
Marietta et al.
(1979)
Spehar et al .
(1978) ~~
Holcombe et al.
(1976) ~
Pagenkopf and
Neuman (1974)
Ray (1978)
Varanasi and Gmur
(1978)


Reichert et al .
(1979)
Stenner and Nickless"
(1975)
  Wet weight.

  Dry weight.
£
  All values were calculated from given water concentration and tissue levels.
  Otherwise factor is as reported by the authors.

  Pteronarcys  dorsata.  Hydropsyche betteni.  Brachycentrus sp.,  Ephemerella sp.
  Physa integra and Gammarus pseudolimnaeus.                     	
                                         4-24

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 total body.  Tissue levels generally ranged from two to four orders of
 magnitude above water concentrations.

      Preferential accumulation of lead in certain organs has been
 reported in various studies.   In fish, the liver and kidney usually
 have higher concentrations than muscle and gill tissue (Leland _et al.
 1979,  Ray 1978, Hardisty et al. 1974).    The digestive tract sometimes
 contains high lead levels (Adams 1975), which implicates diet as an
 exposure route (Bryan and Uysal 1978).   In mollusks, the muscle frequently
 contains high lead concentrations (Pringle et al.  1968, Gire _et al.  1974).

      Limited information on biological half-lives  indicates that lead is
 retained in tissue for at least several months (Schulz-Baldes  1974).
 Half-lives for invertebrate species  of 300 days in the soft parts of
 Mytilus edulis. 170 days in Mesidotal entoman and  50 days in Harmatoe
 were reported (Kauranen and Jarvenpaa 1972).   Reickert and co-workers
 (1979)  observed no increase of lead  concentrations in the kidney or  liver
 of  the  coho salmon during a five-week exposure to  clean water following
 a  two-week exposure to lead.   A depuration rate of 0.48-0.91 mg/kg/day,
 however,  was measured in the  eastern oyster (Pringle ejt al.  1968),
 which indicates the presence  of an effective  excretion mechanism for
 eliminating the metal.

     Tetraalkyllead compounds  have been detected in fish  tissue  from
 various  locations  (Mor and Beccaria  1977,  Harrison 1977, Chau .et al.
 1979).   Rainbow trout bioaccumulate  tetramethyllead as  much  as  three
 orders  of magnitude above water concentrations of  the  compound  (Chau  et  al.
 1979).   No direct  sources of  tetramethyllead  to the environment  are knownT
 however,  certain sediment microorganisms are  capable of methylating
 inorganic lead  nitrate  or trimethyllead acetate to  tetramethyllead, a
 more mobile and biologically accessible form  of lead (Summers and Silver
 1978).   It is unknown how significant this  process  is  in aquatic sediments
 or  its  influence on biotic uptake.   Most of the lead in anaerobic sediment
 is  expected to  be  immobilized  as  lead sulfide  in the presence of sulfur
 (Rickard  and Nriagu 1978); therefore, it is generally unavailable for
 release into the water  column.

           Biomagnification in  Food Chains

     It does not appear that lead concentrations in  aquatic biota increase
 at higher  trophic  levels  (Anderson et al. 1978, Drifmeyer and Odum 1975,
Namminga  et al. 1974, Mathis and Cummings 1973); rather, the exposure
 pathway is  a more  important factor in lead bioaccumulation, as described
 previously.  In fact, secondary consumers often have lower concentrations
 of lead than lower  food chain members (Wong jt_al.  1978).  Phytoplankton
and zooplankton have been  reported to have high lead concentrations in
comparison with other species in the same ecosystem  (Namminga et al.
 1974).   Herbivores and detritivores are likely  to accumulate higher
concentrations than carnivores  (Leland and McNurney 1974).  An explana-
tion for preferential uptake by these organisms is  the strong association
of lead with sediment and organic matter and low levels in the water
column.

                                  4-25

-------
 4-3.2.3  Fate Processes  in Terrestrial Environments

      Movement in  Soil

      Lead is  found  in  the  following  ores:   galena (PbS),  plattnerite
 (Pb02),  cerussite (PbC03),  and  anglesite  (PbS04).   The earth's  crust
 averages approximately 15  yg/g  of  lead.   The  chemistry of lead  in soils
 is  dominated  fay adsorption and  precipitation  reactions, which are
 functions of  the  soil  texture,  cation  exchange  capacity (CEC),  pH and
 in  part,  phosphorous content  (P).

      Several  researchers have proposed regression  equations  to  determine
 the quantity  of lead sorbed per gram of soil.   For instance, the  quantity
 of  lead  sorbed as a function of the  above mentioned parameters  is
 determined by the following equation (with  a  correlation  coefficient
 of  0.997):

              Pb = 34.3 +  0.0774P + 5.358  pH + 5.337  CEC

 where Pb  is in ymoles/g soil (Zimdahl and Hassett  1977).

     As  indicated in Figure 4-5, lead  is adsorbed  quite strongly  by
 soils, exceeded only by copper.  The lead ion is adsorbed  above PH 5
 Below this pH level, precipitation as  PbQ   and  organometallic completion
 are the  control mechanisms of Pb   in  solution  (Zimdahl and Hassett 1977)
 Lead has  a strong tendency to sorb onto soil  particulates  as indicated
 from the  results of most soil column leaching studies.  A  literature
 review by  Zimdahl and Hassett (1977) revealed one  study in which  only
 17  yg/g  soluble Pb was present  in the soil  solution three  days after
 application of 2784 ug/g PbNO    The remaining lead had been sorbed.
 Another  study applied the equivalent of seven years rainfall to a soil
 column containing 460 yg/g Pb.  Only 1.6% of the applied Pb was leachable.
 Jennett et al. (1977)  also found that neutral water was not capable of
 desorbing  lead, or causing Pbs to come into solution.   A recent study
 Stevenson  and Welch (1979), determined the extent of downward migration
 that occurred within 6.5 years of lead applications ranging from 0 to 3200
kg/ha Pb.  Although Figure 4-6 illustrates that the increased levels of
Pb can be observed to  a depth of about  60 centimeters, the initial lead
had been applied to a  depth of 15-30 centimeters.   Below a 60-centimeter
depth, the values  approached background levels.

     Because lead  is readily sorbed onto soil particles, the movement of
lead with runoff is likely.  Entrainment of soil particles is also a
possible route of  lead transport.

     Terrestrial Biological Pathways

          Parameters Affecting Uptake

     Plants are exposed to  lead by  aerial deposition on leaves,  stems,
or bark, and by root uptake from the soil.   Aerosol lead can accumulate
                                  4-26

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
   200
.2
o
£
e
c
   100   -
        2345678    9   10
                       PH

      Source: Huang _etaL (1977).
  FIGURE 4-5  ADSORPTION OF HEAVY METALS ON
              SOIL MINERALS AND OXIDES
                                            4-27

-------
     0-15
    15-30
5   30-45
E
a.
3J

Q
    45-60
    60-75
   75-90
                                0 kg/ha/     800 kg/ha
         1600 kg/ha
                                                              3200 kg/ha
                           1.0
          Source:  Stevenson and Welch (1979).
 2.0


log [Pb] mg/fi
                                                                3.0
4.0
                        FIGURE 4-6   DOWNWARD MOVEMENT OF LEAD IN SOIL
                                         4-28

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 in particulate form on plant foliage.  Although  there is  controversy
 concerning the extent to which plants can accumulate lead  from aerosols,
 it is generally thought to be minimal (Bell et al. 1978),  primarily
 because of the insolubility of lead  (U.S. EPA 1977).   It is difficult to
 obtain data on plant accumulation of lead because of the problems associ-
 ated with the differentiation between lead deposited on and lead absorbed
 by the foliar tissue (Bell _et_ al. 1978).  Studies of plant uptake near
 automobile exhaust indicate that leaves have an extremely  small like-
 lihood of absorbing both the soluble and particulate forms of lead
 (Koeppe 1977).  The amount of lead that can be washed from leaves has
 been reported to be 50% with a range of 8-80%.  The amount removed
 depends on the leaf surface; lead retention is higher in plants with a
 rough or hairy surface (Peterson 1978).

      Rooted plants are not considered good sensors of airborne lead levels
 and attention is being  given to  the  use  of bryophytes.   Little and Martin
 (1972)  reported  that  elm and hawthorne  leaves  could only retain  17% of
 the total  aerial lead  fallout.   They  indicated that 30-90% of  the  fallout
 on the  foliage usually  exists as  a superficial coating  that can  be easily
 washed  off by rain, wind,  etc.  (Rickard  and  Nriagu 1978).

      The soil environment is an  important influence on  the amount  of
 lead accumulated.   The  soil factors  that can result in  a maximum binding
 of lead,  and  thus  a reduced plant uptake,  include a high cation  exchange
 capacity,  pH,  organic matter content, and phosphorous.   Other  factors
 that influence uptake  are soil  temperature,  calcium availability,  soluble
 silicon,  soil texture,  and the geological background  of  the soil.   Zimdahl
 and Koeppe (1977)  found  that the  concentration of lead  in oats and alfalfa
 increased  with a decrease  in pH  and organic  matter, and  that the addition
 of phosphorous reduced  the uptake of  lead.   However,  the association of
 lead and organic matter  has  not  always appeared consistent (U.S. EPA 1977a)

      Still, it is  difficult  to determine  the actual amount  of  lead  taken
 up  by plant roots  because much of the lead is  bound on the  plant surface
 as  crystalline or  amorphous  deposits.  Appreciable uptake  of lead  occurs
 from  hydroponic solutions, which  do not have complicated binding para-
 meters  (Koeppe 1977).   Warren (1978)  concluded that no simple  relation-
 ship  exists between the lead content  of vegetables and the  soil in which
 they  are grown and that each vegetable has a characteristic lead accumula-
 tion  ability.   In general, the overall mean plant/soil ratio of lead was
 8%.   However,   not all vegetables growing in lead-contaminated soil will
 exhibit elevated levels of lead (Peterson 1978).

     The amount of  lead absorbed by vegetation and moved into above-ground
portxons depends  on the species,  soil type, and many  environmental  factors.
                                   4-29

-------
 The  amount  translocated  is  generally  low.   The  highest  lead concentra-
 tions are usually associated with  the organ that  has  the  greatest surface
 to volume ratio and  the  roughest or most pubescent  surface,  generally the
 roots  (Peterson 1978, Smith 1976).  In general, there appears  to  be a
 7- to 10-fold decrease in lead  concentration from root  to foliage and a
 similar decrease from foliage to grain (Zimdahl and Koeppe 1977).

          Bioconcentration  Factors

     A few  bioconcentration factors  (BCF)  for different species of vege-
 tation are  calculated in Table  4-9.   The high degree  of variability
 reflects species differences as well  as differences in  exposure sources.
 Yopee and co-workers (1974) have recommended that the maximum  permissible
 level of lead to which crop plants are exposed should not be >2.0 mg/kg
 when soluble in soil solution.

     Numerous studies have  investigated lead bioaccumulation in terres-
 trial invertebrates, such as earthworms  (Gish and Christensen  1973,
 Gullvag 1978) and grasshoppers  (Scanlon 1978), and  in vertebrates,  such
 as small mammals and birds  (Clark 1979, Roberts et_  al. 1978, Haschek
_et al. 1979).  Some of the  measured tissue  concentrations  are  reported
 in Section  4.2, Distribution of Lead  in the  Environment.   Unfortunately,
 it is very  difficult to relate environmental  media  concentrations  to  the
 extent of lead uptake in terrestrial  animals  because  of the many  exposure
 pathways possible (e.g.,  ingestion of  contaminated  food,  inhalation,
 dermal absorption from soil, etc.)-  No laboratory  studies were found
 that might have provided insight into  exposure levels and bioaccumulation
 in terrestrial animals.

 4.3.3  Major Environmental Pathways

 4.3.3.1  Pathway #1 — Atmospheric Transport
  Atmospheric
   Emissions
Groundwater
                                                          Ocean
                                                          POTW
                                                           Air
              •Pathway #4
                                   4-30

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
                      TABLE 4-9.  LEAD ACCUMULATION BY VEGETATION
Species
Field Studies
Oak roots
.4 km away
2.0 km away
control
Mixed Species
Fall


Spring


Fall

Spring

Lettuce




Potato




Source

Lead smelter




Lead smelter


Lead smelter


Control

Control

Highway
47,100 car/
24 hrs
30 ft from
road
Highway
47,100 car/
24 hrs
30 ft from
road
Exposure
(mg/kg)
Soil: 6376
Soil: 208
Soil: 140-190
Soil: 13.6-25

Soil: 52
dry wt

Soil: 88.6


Soil: 13

Soil: 18.9

Air: 4. 5 Ug/m^



Soil: 134
Air: 4. 4 wg/m3



Soil: 134
Accumulated
(mg/kg)
2400
6.0
3.0


Roots: 208
Unwashed
Tops: 326
Roots: 309
Unwashed
Tops: 823
Roots: 12.7
Tops: 25.8
Roots: 22.3
Tops: 37.6
Leaves: 24



Roots: 24
Leaves: 87



Roots: 33
Calculated BCF

.36
.02
.08
.08

Roots: 4


Roots: 3.49


Roots: .98

Roots: 1.18

Whole plant:
48/138.5=
.35


Whole plant:
120/138.5=

.87

Reference

Jackson and
Watson (1977)



Peterson (1978)


Peterson (1978)


Peterson (1978)

Peterson (1978)

Bell et al.
(1978)



Bell et al.
(1978"5



Laboratory Studies

 Barley
Apple  leaves
Corn tops
Laboratory
Potted soil &
colored news-
print


4 weeks in lab
soil without
optimum pH,
CEC & phos-
phorous for
binding pH


Hydrophonic
for 3 days-
Soil: 800
567 (dry)
(2nd yr)
2000 soil
Roots: 800
dry wt
Tops:  3
dry wt
                             Roots: 1.0   Zimdahl and
                                          Koeppe (1977)
7.71 dry wt   0.01
(5.50 control)
               200-400
               dry wt
                                                                0.1-0.2
                                                                             Elfving et al.
                                                                             (1979)
                           Koeppe (1977)
                                   100 ug Pb/ml   Roots:10,600  Roots:106
                                                  dry wt
                                                  Tops: 390     Tops: 3.9
                                                  dry wt
                                          Koeppe (1977)
                                         4-31

-------
      Sources

      Pathway  #1  describes  the fate of lead entering the atmosphere
 as  a result of the combustion of gasoline with lead alkyl additives;
 the storage and  distribution of leaded gasoline;  mining,  milling,
 and smelting  of  primary lead ores; zinc and copper smelting; fossil
 fuel combustion;  and iron  and steel production.   Each of  these sources
 is  unique  with respect  to  the chemical and physical form  of the
 emitted  lead  and the geographical and vertical source distribution.
 Except for the evaporation of tetraethyl and tetramethyl  lead from
 leaded gasoline,  most atmospheric emissions of lead are in the particu-
 late form.

      Automotive  Emissions  — Antiknock Additives

      The lead alkyl  gasoline additives,  tetraethyllead (TEL) and tetra-
 methyllead (TML),  may be released by evaporation  during storage or
 distribution.  The release of these additives  appears to  be the predom-
 inant mechanism  rather  than combustion,  since  the highest concentrations
 of  organoleads have  been reported in samples taken near a busy gas
 station  (0.59 yg/m3) and in an underground'parking garage (1.8-2.2 yg/m3)
 (U.S. EPA  1977a).  Organolead concentrations comprised 10 and  17%,
 respectively,  of  the total airborne lead.   Laveskog (1971)  also observed
 small amounts of  vapor  phase tetraalkyllead compounds in  automobile
 exhaust, where  they are likely  to be  quickly  adsorbed onto exhaust
 particulates  (Harrison  and Laxen 1978).   In urban air,  organoleads
 typically  comprise 1-4% of the total airborne  lead (Harrison and Perry
 1977).

      Harrison and  Laxen (1978)  recently  investigated  the  chemistry of
 TEL  and TML in ambient  air.   They  concluded that  like the atmospheric
 chemistry  of  other hydrocarbons, homogeneous gas  phase reactions predom-
 inate in the  breakdown  of  these  compounds.   Their results indicate that
 daytime decay rates for TML  range  from 3-29%/hr,  and  for  TEL,  17-93%/hr.
 The  stable lead compounds  formed by these decay processes have not been
 identified.

     Automobile Exhaust

     The U.S.  EPA  (1977a) has effectively summarized data on the
 particulate sizes  associated with  exhaust from leaded  gasoline combustion
 in automobiles.  Under  cruise  conditions, automobile  exhaust contains
 lead  in extremely  small aerosol sizes.   The  reported mass median diameter
 is generally  0.5-pm or  less.   Chamberlain et. al^.  (1975) report even
 smaller sizes  (0.015 ym).  Particles <0.1 ym rapidly  coagulate via
 Brownian motion to form particles  0.1-0.5 ym in diameter.    On  the  other
 hand, during  cold  start or acceleration, the particle  sizes  are consi-
 derably larger, with mass median diameters  in the  range of  2-10 ym.
Haibibi (1973) and Ter Haar et al.  (1972) found that the mass median
 diameter increased with vehicle mileage.  Ter Haar  and  co-workers  (1972)
 estimated  that approximately  35% of  the Pb burned  over  the  lifetime of
                                   4-32

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 a car is emitted as fine particulate (<0.5  m) and 40% is emitted as
 participates (>0.5 m) .   Thus,  actually only 75% of the lead burned is
 released to the atmosphere.

      The predominant chemical  form of lead in automobile exhaust is
 PbBrCl.   During acceleration,  with hotter exhaust conditions,  the
 PbBrCl deposited in the exhaust  system is released either by scouring
 or vaporization.

      Biggens and Harrison (1980)  hypothesize that the reaction of
 PbBrCl leads to the release  of HBr and HC1 in acid sulfate droplets
 (H2SC>4 and  NH^SO^).  This mechanism may account for the observed
 decrease in Br/Pb ratios in  aged  urban aerosols, and may produce rela-
 tively insoluble PbSC>4,  which  is  a significant component of urban lead
 aerosols that has been  shown to increase in concentration in aged
 exhaust  aerosols (Ter Haar and Bayard 1971) and road dusts (Biggins and
 Harrison 1980,  Olson and Skogerboe 1975).

      In  rural environments affected by  automotive exhaust,  but presumably
 exposed  to  lower concentrations of S02,  sulfates,  and photochemical pre-
 cursors,  Ter Haar and Bayard (1971)  observed that the predominant lead
 compounds were  PbBrCl,  PbC03,  PbOx,  and  (PbO)2PbC03,  with lesser contri-
 butions  from PbCl£ and
          Wet/Dry Deposition

     Automobile exhaust is emitted very close to  the roadway, which  is
an important factor in the substantial dry deposition near  the  roadway.
Large particles (> 20 ym) are expected to be deposited on the roadway
or within a few meters.  Smaller particulates will also experience large
deposition rates by.impaction near the roadway as a result  of their  high
groundlevel concentrations.   Nonetheless,  a significant fraction,
probably on the order of 20-50% of the emitted lead, is associated with
fine particulates that are carried as aerosols away from the source  and
comprise the bulk of the urban lead aerosol observed at greater distances
(< 100 meters) from heavily travelled roads (U.S. EPA 1977a).

     The significant fraction (probably 20-50%) of automotive lead that
is transported from the immediate source is expected to be  deposited,
possibly at great distances from the source, by precipitation.  The
long-term impacts may be significant, particularly in mountainous regions
that receive large rainfall.  These areas scavenge effectively both water
and lead from the air.

     In the northeast,  this rain is likely to be acidic (ph <5.6), which
would enhance the solubility of Pb by exacerbating the impacts on surface
waters.   For example,  Hirao and Patterson (1974) found that nearly all
of the lead entering an isolated High Sierra mountain watershed was of
anthropogenic origin,  which was dominated by emissions from combustion
of leaded gasoline.   This lead was delivered to the watershed via snow-
fall (92%)  and dry deposition on foliage  (8%).   Ninety-eight percent of
the lead entering the watershed each year is held there and is primarily


                                   4-33

-------
 associated with organic matter in the uppermost soil horizons.  The
 reported deposition rate (0.9 mg/m2/yr)  is one of the lowest observed
 worldwide (Nriagu 1978a).  Thus,  at great distances from sources of
 automotive lead,  wet deposition is the predominant air-to-surface
 pathway.

      This is  not  to suggest  that washout of automotive lead near road-
 ways  is  not important.   Indeed,  washout  rates  near roadways are much
 greater  than  those observed  in the High  Sierra:  Atkins & Kruger (1968)
 observed wet  deposition rates of 40 mg/m2/yr in Palo Alto.   However,
 washout  was only  24% of the  total deposition in Palo Alto.

           Deposition on Soils

      Once lead  is deposited,  it  is held  strongly in the soil,usually
 in  the upper  1-5  centimeters.  The understanding of the chemical forms
 and fate  of lead  in soils  is  limited because of insufficient analytical
 data.  Olson  and  Skogerboe (1975)  found  that 50-70% of the  lead in
 roadside  soil samples existed as  PbS04.   Other compounds  identified
 included  PbO-PbS04,  lead oxides,  metallic lead,  and PbS.  The  conversion
 of  PbBrCl to  PbS04 may  occur  either in the  atmosphere  prior to deposi-
 tion, or  in the soil.   Biggins and Harrison (1980)  essentially confirmed
 these findings, identifying also  PbS04-(NH4)2,  Pb304,  and 2PbC03-Pb(OH)7.
 Elemental lead was  associated with sites  where vehicle cold-starts  occur.
 PbS04 is  one  of the  more soluble  of these compounds, although  all  are
 relatively  insoluble at typical  soil pHs.   Lead  is  generally associated
with organic  matter  in  the soil  (Siccama  et  al.  1980).  All" studies find
 that lead is  strongly associated with the solid  phase  in  the soil
 environment.

     This fact, combined with the  observed  concentration of  lead in the
 upper soil horizons, implies  that  erosion and  washoff  of soil  particles
by  surface  runoff  is the major pathway for  surface water contamination by
lead deposited from the  atmosphere.  Bertine and Mendeck (1978) studied lake
sediments in  the vicinity of New Haven, CT  in  order  to  examine  contami-
nation of surface waters by lead in  urban areas, where  the primary  lead
inputs are  from automotive exhaust.  In this particular watershed,  lead
contamination from the late 1800s  to 1920 was predominantly  related  to
coal consumption; after 1920, automotive  lead was the predominant input.
KLeinsman  and  co-workers (1977) analyzed Pb fallout and  runoff  in New
York City and suggested that automotive sources contribute a major
fraction of the lead input to the New York harbor.

     Dry deposition of lead may also occur on vegetative surfaces.   The
lead on these surfaces is generally easily washed off; and it is unlikely
that significant plant uptake occurs.

     Smelters, Coal and Oil Combustion and Iron and Steel Production

     Lead emissions from coal and oil combustion, smelters,  and iron
and steel production are similar in that most of these emissions are
                                4-34

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 released from elevated point sources.  In general, baghouses or electro-
 static precipitators control participate emissions from smelters and
 many fossil-fuel utilities.  These precipitators release only the smaller
 particulates.  Furthermore, because of the condensation process that forms
 lead particulates at high temperatures, lead tends to be concentrated in
 the finer particulates, which are generally <1 ym.  Consequently, these
 particulates are widely dispersed and are deposited predominantly by
 precipitation.

      The chemical characterization of these sources are expected to
 differ,  although the precise chemical characterization of lead contain-
 ing aerosols from these sources is unknown.   Corrin and Natusch (1977)
 cite unpublished studies that show PbS, PbS04,  and elemental lead as
 the predominant lead species in smelter baghouse exhaust.   Nriagu (1978b)
 indicates all of the above lead species,  plus PbCC^,  PbO'PbS04,
 PbO-PbS04,  Pb included in other metal oxides, and lead silicates as
 possible chemical forms in smelter exhaust.

      Apparently,  lead in particulates is  preferentially adsorbed onto
 the surface of  the  smaller silicate particles or included  in soot
 particles (Corrin and Natusch 1977).   Nriagu  (1978b) also  suggests  the
 presence of PbOx, PbS04,  Pb(N03)2,  and PbO-PbS04.

      Lead from  smelters or fossil-fired utilities  is likely  to be quite
 insoluble,  although  the lead sulfates,  which  may be a  major  component
 of  smelter  exhaust,  are relatively  more soluble  than the other forms.

          Deposition on Soils

      The  effects  of  smelter  emissions  have been  intensively  studied.
 Jennett  et  al.  (1977) performed  a study of a  forest ecosystem contami-
 nated by  lead emissions  in the New  Lead Belt  of  southeastern Missouri.
 Smelter emissions were  found to  result  in significant  deposition of  lead
 at  least  as  far as two miles from the  smelter.  Basically, fugitive  dusts
 generated during ore  transport and  handling are the predominant cause
 of  extremely high deposition rates within 1000 feet of the smelter.
 Almost one-half the particulate  lead in the smelter stack emissions  is
 associated with particles <1 ym  diameter.  On the other hand, fugitive
 dusts show a mass median diameter of about 7 ym, with  40% >10 ym.

     Deposited lead is concentrated in the upper one inch of the soil
 profile where the surface  is covered by leaf litter.   In locations
without surface leaf litter, several inches of the soil profile were
 contaminated.  Exposed plant parts  (grasses, tree leaves, lettuce, etc.)
 are seriously contaminated by lead, while roots and tissues are relatively
uncontaminated.   This tendency of lead to be associated with surface
vegetation and leaf litter (as observed in roadside environments) causes
contamination of surface waters by runoff and soil erosion.  In storm-
water analyses,  Jennett and co-workers (1977)  demonstrated surface water
contamination by showing relatively constant low levels of dissolved
lead throughout two  storms, while levels of suspended  lead increased
                                  4-35

-------
 dramatically  in  phase with  stonnwater  flow and suspended solids content.
 These  sediments  are  subsequently  deposited in man-made lakes,  which
 drain  the contaminated watershed  (Jennett  _e_t  al.  1977).

     The Walker  Branch watershed  of  Oak  Ridge,  TN is  predominantly
 affected by coal-fired power plants.   Studies by  Andren  _et  al.  (1975)
 are apparently the only observations of  lead  deposition  that  focus on
 coal-derived  lead.   The observed  deposition rates of  60  mg/ta2/yr are
 typical of those reported universally  and  summarized  by  Nriagu  (1978b).
 As expected for  emissions from a  coal-fired utility with tall  stacks,
 ~67% of the lead deposition was by wet deposition.

     Mining and  Milling of Lead Ores

     Mining and  milling of lead ores create fugitive  dusts  comprised
 primarily of  PbS, but also containing  PbC03,  PbS04 Pb5(P04)3Cl,  lead
 oxides, and lead silicates.  The  particle  sizes are large  and  the sources
 are at ground level.  Under these conditions,  one would  expect extremely
 localized concentrations and depositions,  based on Jennett  and co-workers'
 (1977) observations  in the vicinity of mines, mills,  and on haul  roads.
 The PbS particulates are insoluble and will be subject to runoff  during
 storms.  Foraging species may become significantly contaminated  (Jennett
 et al. 1977).

     Summary

     The principle source of atmospheric lead emissions  is  from auto-
mobile use.   The fate of lead depends on the size distribution of  the
 lead particulates,  which,  in turn, is a function of the operating  condi-
 tions of the car.  Cold starts,  and stop and go traffic, promote large
particle sizes and immediate deposition; cruise conditions  form smaller
lead aerosols, which are subject to wider dispersion.   The height  of
lead release causes the greatest impact near the road.  A significant
20-50% remains airborne,  however.   Lead emissions from mining and  smelting
operations cause localized high concentrations of lead.  Smelters and
other sources, which have higher stacks, allow for greater dispersion of
lead releases.

     The deposited  lead forms are  largely insoluble.   Lead accumulates in
the top few inches  of leaf litter  and soil.  Runoff and erosion introduce
lead into surface waters  as a suspended solid, which result in accumula-
tion of lead in the sediment.
                                  4-36

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 I
I
 I
I
I
 4-3.3.2  Pathway $2 — Solid Wastes, Tailings, and Municipal Landfill;
Solid Wastes,
Coal Piles and
Open Mines
\
«te.


Surface
Water j
Sediment

if
»

^ Ocean

/
                                   Groundwater
      Sources


      In  general,  solid  wastes  containing  lead  are  created  by mineral ore
 processing, iron  and  steel  production,  copper  and  zinc  smelting,  and the
 production and"use  of various  lead-containing  products.  Pathway  #2
 describes the fate  of lead  in  the  environment  as a result-of these sources,
 The  solid wastes  result from the overburden  of mining and  low-grade
 portions of mineral ore deposits.  Tailings, which are  highly concen-
 trated in minerals, are produced as a final  waste  product  of mineral
 concentrating operations.   Municipal waste landfills accumulate objects
 containing lead,  such as objects covered with  lead-containing pigments,
 or solder.  Although  lead batteries are the  most obvious sources of  lead
 to municipal landfills,  they are not a major contributor to  lead  concen-
 trations in municipal dumps, because car batteries  are  generally  recycled.


     Mining of lead has been principally restricted to  the state  of
 Missouri.  The Old Lead Belt was found in the  southeast portion of the
 state and is currently  inactive.  The New Lead Belt (also referred to as
 the Viburnum Trend), in the southwest portion  of the state,  has been first
 in world lead production since 1970 (Wixson  1978).  Since 1873, lead
 mining has resulted in 1550 million metric tons of  tailings,  and 3875
 million metric tons of combined tailings and waste  (Martin and Mills
 1976).  Disposal of these wastes in the 19th and early 20th  centuries
 was without regard to environmental considerations, and thus  erosion and
weathering contributed to adverse environmental impacts.  Currently,
 tailings are used to create dams for the establishment of tailing ponds.


     The lead  species  in solid  wastes  and  tailings  depend on the nature of
 the ore.   Galena  (PbS) is most commonly mined and is the most frequently
encountered form of lead in mine tailings.  Other lead species include
PbO,  PbC03 and PbS04 (Zimdahl and Hassett  1977, Jennett  1979).
                                  4-37

-------
     Acid Mine Drainage

     Tailings and solid wastes from mineral mining aid  in  the  formation
of mineralized acid drainage.  The impact of acid mine  drainage  to  local
surface waters largely depends on the alkalinity, or buffering capacity,
of the waters upstream or downstream of  the point of discharge.   The
streams channelling the Old and New Lead Belts are quite buffered and  of
a neutral to slightly basic pH (Zimdahl and Hassett 1977,  Wixson 1978).
Thus, rarely has lead in tailing etfluents been a problem in local screams
(Zimdahl and Hassett 1977).  Most of the lead entering  the streams  is
associated with suspended solids in the form of PbS, PBC03, PbO  and PbS04-

     Fate Processes in Streams

     Little evidence substantiates that surface mineralization in the
Lead Belts of Missouri has elevated levels of lead in the  surface waters.
As stated earlier, most of the lead in the water column is in  the
undissolved, particulate form.  Lead in the Old Lead Belt  enters  the
streams principally via runoff and leaching through tailings (Wixson
1978).  In the New Lead Belt region, the velocity of the streams  is high
enough to prevent the suspended particulates from settling out.

     Eventually, the streams discharge into Clearwater  Lake, which  is
about 30 miles from the last few mine discharges, and is dammed  at  one
end.   The lead concentrations in Clearwater Lake sediments range  from
<3 mg/kg at the point of stream entry to 60 mg/kg near the dam  (Zimdahl
and Hassett 1977).   Lakes with long narrow arms,  such as Clearwater,
experience scour and washout during storms.   The  sediments are therefore
transported to the base of the dam.  In this specific lake, the lake
sediments act as a temporary sink for heavy metals.   Opening the dam
during periods of high in-flow,  effectively removes  the metals from the
lake sediments,  thereby accounting for the low levels of lead found in
Clearwater Lake sediments (Wixson 1978,  Zimdahl and  Hassett 1977).

     Coggins and co-workers (1979) investigated the drinking water
quality of the reservoir in the area engaged in lead and silver mining.
Lead concentrations were in the range 50-69 yg/1 in the water column.
Lead in the sediments averaged 150 mg/kg (ranging from  30-650 mg/kg),
which was principally adsorbed onto the clay fraction of the sediments.
Other metals were also associated with iron and manganese hydrous oxides,
or complexed with organic matter; for the most part, lead was not.

     Groundwater Contamination from Tailings and  Mining Activity

     Mink (1972) investigated the groundwater of  the Coeur d'Alene mining
area in Idaho.  Evidence indicated that the effluent of a tailings pond
was not responsible for the high levels of lead found in the groundwater.
The aquifer pollution was a result of contact with tailings from old
abandoned mining operations.  Solubilization of the  heavy metals  in the
tailings by the high water table resulted in concentrations of 6% lead
in the upper aquifer.
                                  4-38

-------
       Fly Ash Ponds

       Disposal of  fly ash generated from coal combustion has created
  concerns about the leaching  potential  of metals  associated with the fly
  ash.  Theis jȣ al.  (1978) studied  the  extent of  groundwater contaminations
  from  a  fly ash pond.  Analysis  of  the  fly ash indicated that Pb was the
  third most abundant heavy metal (after arsenic and  zinc)  in the flv ash
  In  the  groundwater leachate,  lead  was  generally  found  in  the lowest
  concentration of  the metals  tested, at about 40  ug/1,  100 feet  from the
  pond.   Precipitation as  the  hydroxide  and carbonate, rather than sorption
  on  the  iron and manganese oxides controlled  lead concentrations
  (Theis _et al. 1978).  The degree of precipitation is a  function of  pH.
 Theis et al.   (1978) show that abrupt precipitation of lead results  at an
 approximate pH of 6.5, thereby reducing the concentration of soluble Pb
 from 10-^0 moles/1 at pH 6  to 10~6 moles/I at pH 7.

      Municipal Landfills

      Roulier  (1975) conducted a study using soil from two sites  to
 examine municipal solid wastes disposal, and subsequent metal leaching.
 At one site,  conditions favored metal attenuation,  and, at the  other
 landfill, a "worst case" scenario was simulated.

      The first site collected leachate from 1.390 kilograms of municipal
 refuse under  anaerobic conditions in a soil column.   The concentration
 of lead was below the detection limit of 0.5 mg/1 and fell into the
 category of "least generally  mobile."

      The second study used soil columns packed with  quartz sand and
 pure clay,  and pure leachate  was slowly passed from  municipal landfills
 through  the columns.  Under these conditions,  99.8%  of  the lead  was atten-
 uated  by the  soils,  exceeding zinc, cadmium and mercury.  The controlling
 mechanism as  in the fly  ash study was precipitation  at  neutral to alka-
 line pH  ranges,  and sorption  to  clays.

     Data from other landfills  show lead concentrations  ranging  from
 0.1-2  mg/1, with less  than 0.1 mg/1 as  a typical  value  (U.S.  EPA 1977b).
 Another  study  of 12 landfills ranging in age  from 0.25 to  16  years  showed
 a mean lead concentration in  the  leachate  of  0.92 mg/1  (range 0.1-3.2 mg/1)
 (Chian and DeWalle  1977); this is slightly under  an order  of  magnitude
 greater  than  the above study.

     Lead in Soils  from House Paint

     Although  lead from house paints contributes to localized high  levels
 of lead  in the soils immediately surrounding a  lead-painted house,  on
 the whole, this is not a significant source of  lead to the land.  Ranges
 of 1000-2000 mg/kg in the soil have been reported (Bogden and Louria 1975)
 Even though the concentration of lead in house paints is now controlled
 older wooden houses may still be covered with leaded paint.  Natural
weathering and sanding and scraping houses prior to repainting are ways
                                  4-39

-------
in which lead is transferred to the soil.  Bogden and Louria (1975)
analyzed the soil lead concentrations 15 and 30 meters away from a
repainted house, at the time of scraping the leaded paint, and one year
later.   The lead concentration in the paint chips was 17%.  The resul-
tant soil concentrations are shown below:

           Lead Content at Various Distances from the House
      Time Period

      August 1973
      August 1974
      Control Soils
                    Concentration  (mg/kg)
                    15 meters   30 meters
                       185
                       440
                     130-220
165
490
     Summary

     Thus far, the surface waters of the New Lead Belt do not show
elevated levels of lead.  It is believed that the highly buffered,
neutral-to-basic nature of the streams channelling the New Lead belt
prevents the lead from solubilizing or settling out.  Frequent
opening of the Clearwater Lake dam scours lead that settles onto the
lake sediments.  Groundwater contamination from tailing ponds and fly
ash ponds does not appear to be a significant source of lead, although
it has occurred in some cases.  Lead, in groundwater leachate is con-
trolled by precipitation as the hydroxide or carbonate, provided that
the pH is not acid.   Municipal waste leachate studies categorize lead
in the least generally mobile metal group, where adsorption to clays and
precipitation control its movement.

4.3.3.3  Pathway #3  — Aqueous Industrial Discharge
                Effluent
        r
  Aque.ous
 Discharge
Treatment
              Sludge
            Hazardous Waste
            Solid Waste Dump
                                                 Pathway
                                                   #4
                                 4-40

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
      Sources


      Sources of aqueous discharges of lead to the environment include
 lead production, coal mining, and industries such as lead battery manu-
 facture,  paper and pulp and nonferrous metals production.   Pathway #3
 describes the fate of lead as a result of aqueous industrial discharge.
 The lead battery industry is a major user of secondary lead and
 recycles the wastewater to recover additional lead.   Wastewater
 treatment,  as exercised by the lead battery industry, consists of a
 settling tank,  neutralization unit, in which lime, ammonia, or sodium
 hydroxide is added to increase the pH;  a scrubbing unit,  which removes
 dissolved carbon dioxide by aeration; and, finally,  another settling
 tank,  to which coagulants are added to flocculate and precipitate the
 suspended materials.   Eventually,  the sludge from both settling tanks
 is  collected,  dewatered,  and processed to recover the high lead content.
 The effluent from the second settling tank is discharged  to local surface
 waters  or POTWs  (Chloride Overseas 1971).   Fochtman  and Mass (1972) found
 that the  lead content of several  lead battery effluents ranged from
 0.5 to  3.0 mg/1  dissolved lead, and from 5 to 35  mg/1 suspended  lead.


      The  paper and pulp  industry  also discharges  lead to  water.   This
 discharge is principally  a result  of  the lead-containing  pigments on the
 paper.  Concentrations  of lead  in  paper  coating and  glazing effluents
 range from 0.05  to  1000 mg/1.  After  treatment and dilution,  the  average
 lead concentration in the final effluent of  17 paper and  pulp  mills was
 16  ug/1  (U.S. EPA  1979).


     Distribution  to  Surface  Waters


     Mathis  and  Cummings  (1973) and Mclntosh  and  Bishop (1976) have
 studied the  distribution  of  lead discharged  into  surface  waters.   The
 Mathis and Cummings (1973) study used the  Illinois River  as  its environ-
 mental system.   The river  is  known  to receive both municipal and  indus-
 trial discharges.  When compared with nonindustrial  use (rural) rivers,
 the average  lead concentrations in  the sediments  of  the Illinois  River
 (28 mg/kg) was 1.6  times  that of the  rural streams (17 mg/kg).  The
 water column contained an  average of  0.002 mg/1 lead.


     Mclntosh and Bishop  (1976) researched the level  of pollution  in a
 small eutrophic  lake,  which was the receptor of direct industrial
 discharges primarily  from metal plating and urban runoff.   The metal
 plating was discontinued in 1974; Mclntosh and Bishop  (1976) examined
 the changes  in the  lake  in the tabulation  of  the  data below.   These
values represent averages, and thus the columns do not necessarily add:


                                     Lead concentration (yg/1)

          Water Column                  1974         1975

          Dissolved                     24            9.4
          Suspended                     15.2          6.6
          Total                         28.6         14.4
                                  4-41

-------
 Of the ^4 water samples collected from Little Center Lake, dissolved
 lead was detected (limit =2.0 ug/l)  in only 50% of the samples and
 suspended lead in only 18% of the samples.   The lead,  however, is quite
 evident in the lake  sediments.   The top ten centimeters contained
 between 450-500 mg/kg  Pb dry weight.   The highest concentration of lead
 in the lake sediments  was near the street sewer outfall,  from which
 suspended lead quickly settled out.

      Sludge Disposal

      The sludge generated by industrial effluent treatment is  normally
 disposed of in a solid or hazardous waste dump,  or  treated to  recover
 the  lead,  as in the  battery  industry.   A properly designed landfill site
 should prevent significant translocation of  lead, which has  a  tendency
 to precipitate in an insoluble  state.   Groundwater  contamination  is not
 likely in  a landfill or  settling  pond  as  the  evidence  in Pathway  #2
 suggests.

     Ultimate  Sinks

     The sediments are the major  sinks  for lead  discharged with indus-
 trial  effluent  into surface waters.  Treated  industrial effluents
 generate a waste  sludge  into which most of the lead partitions.  Disposal
 of the sludge  at a hazardous or municipal landfill will generally prevent
further translocation of lead in the environment, with the exception of
runoff.


      Summary

      The manufacture of  lead batteries  could  conceivably result in  large
 quantities  of  lead discharged into  the  environment.  However, waste
 effluent  treatment practices, which have  been effective since  the early
 1970s, have allowed  little lead to be discharged via this  route.
 Studies  of  stream and  lake systems receiving  industrial discharge indi-
 cate that  the  sediments  concentrate most  of the  lead.  Waste effluents
 treated  prior  to  discharge generate sludges that are disposed of in a
 hazardous waste site.  Mobilization is not generally expected to occur
 from this site.

 4-3.3.4  Pathway #4 — Publicly-owned Treatment Works

POTW Influent
— —
Primary
Treatment

\
-~

Biol.
Treatment
/
Sludge
-
Surface
Waters

—

Ocean

	 Incineration, Land
                                  4-42

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
      Treatment Scheme


      Pathway #4 describes the fate of lead in wastewaters that are
 introduced into a publicly-owned treatment work  (POTW).  The inflow
 to the POTW may be a combination of industrial and commercial effluents,
 domestic wastes, and surface runoff.  Consequently, the nature of the
 influent is quite varied; however, typical influent lead concentrations
 will be -0.1 mg/1 (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1979).


      The degree to which lead is removed from the raw wastewaters, and
 thus the concentration of lead in the discharged x^astewaters, depends
 on the type of treatment involved.   The U.S.  EPA (1977c)  provides a
 summary of data from 269 municipal treatment plants in the United States
 that use various treatment methods.   The data for lead are summarized in
 Table 4-10.


      Lead partitions into the sludge during treatment.  Oliver and
 Cosgrove (1974)  found that lead  immediately precipitates  when introduced
 to sewage.   The  metal exceeds others in this  capacity.


      Sludge  Disposal


      Sludge  disposed onto land may go  to a  sanitary landfill,  or  be
 spread  for  the purpose  of amending the  soil.   The form of  lead  in sludge
 is not  exactly known.   Sommers and co-workers  (1976) found  that lead
 sulfides, phosphates, and hydroxides were not  detected in  sludges
 containing relatively high concentrations of lead.


      Sludge  routed to municipal  landfills was  described in  the section
 on Pathway #2.   Sludge  that  is incinerated will  contribute  to  the con-
 centrations  of lead  in  the atmosphere.   The fate  processes will be
 similar to those described in the discussion on  Pathway //I.


      Surface Water Discharge


      The behavior of  lead  discharged with POTW effluents into local
 surface waters will be  similar to that already described for aqueous
 pathways  (Pathway #3).  Morel and co-workers (1975) have provided a
 detailed study of the fate of lead discharged by  the Joint Water
 Pollution Control Project  (JWPCP) of the Los Angeles County Sanitation
 District; these discharges may be generally representative of POTW
 discharges to the ocean.1  Three equilibrium models were applied  to
 the sewage to determine the speciation of heavy metals present in the
 sewage.  Lead was present entirely as PbS in all models regardless of
 the input of organic-complexing agents or adsorption surfaces.


     Although lead was found in the fairly insoluble sulfide form in the
effluent (370 mgd effluent, discharged through submarine outfalls at a


-"-The wastes,  containing both domestic and industrial wastes, contain
 high levels of lead (250 mg/1)  after primary treatment.
                                  4-43

-------
        TABLE 4-10.   EFFLUENT DATA FROM U.S.  MUNICIPAL TREATMENT
                     PLANTS USING VARIOUS TREATMENT METHODS
Type of Treatment

Primary

Biological (all types)

Activated sludge

Trickling filter

Biological with chemical addition

Tertiary
                                           Effluent Data (Means)
% Removal
of Pb
24
38
39
37
39
44
Pb Concentration
(mg/1)
.136
.092
.067
.116
not available
not available
Source:   U.S.  EPA (1977c).
                                   4-44

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
 depth of 60 meters), the studies indicated that the combined processes
 of dilution and oxidation resulted in substantial solubilization of lead
 (as well as other metals); this increases the residence time of lead in
 the water and allows it to be transported greater distances.

      Summary

      The concentration of lead in POTW effluent, and the effectiveness
 of its removal depends upon the initial influent concentration and type
 of treatment enacted.   Most of the lead partitions into the sludge
 during treatment.   Discharge to marine systems causes solubilization
 of lead, which prohibits "hot-spots" because of dilution.   In freshwaters,
 lead is expected to largely partition into the sediments.

 4.4  OVERVIEW

 4.4.1  Atmospheric Levels and Pathways

      The atmosphere receives  the greatest portion  (53%)  of the  total
 environmental releases  of lead;  approximately  93%  of these releases are
 a  result of automobile  emissions.   Transport of lead in  the atmosphere
 depends on  particle size,  chemical  form,  and the distribution and  height
 of the release.  Particles  larger  than 20 ym are rapidly deposited.
 Although automobile exhaust  contains  lead in extremely small aerosol
 sizes,  with a mass median diameter  of 0.5 ym or less, large particles
 may be released  during  cold  start or  acceleration.   These  larger par-
 ticles are  deposited onto the roadway,  or within a few meters.  Smaller
 particles also are deposited,  to some extent,  near the roadway  by
 impaction;  however,  some  fraction is  carried a distance  (<100 m)'from
 heavily travelled  roads and may  be  deposited by washout.   Still, precipi-
 tation may  carry some of  the  particles  a  considerable distance; thus,
 more remote areas  may be  contaminated.

      Lead releases  of smelter, fossil fuel combustion, and  iron and
 steel  production are primarily from elevated point sources  and are
 generally less than  1 ym  in size.  Consequently, these particulates  are
 widely  dispersed and are primarily deposited by  precipitation.  Smelter
 emissions result in  significant  deposition of  lead at distances up  to
 two  miles from the smelter.   Fugitive dusts account  for  higher deposition
 near the source.  Airborne releases from mining  and milling  operations
 will largely be in the form of fugitive dusts,  resulting in  localized
 deposition.

     The deposited lead forms from all atmospheric sources are largely
 insoluble.  Lead accumulates  in plants, leaf litter,  and soil.  Runoff
 and  erosion introduce lead into surface waters as a suspended solid,
which results in sediment concentration.

     The monitoring data for lead generally reflect these fate pathways.
 The  range of lead levels in air for  remote areas of the  continental United
 States is 0.0001-0.01 yg/m3.  In contrast, urban areas show levels of
                                 4-45

-------
0.5-10 yg/m3, which are considerably higher, primarily because of
automobile use.  The monitoring data show rapid deposition; and it has
been estimated that lead levels in air generally decrease by about 50%
between 10 and 50 meters from the highway.

     Elevated atmospheric lead levels are also found in the vicinity of
point sources, such as smelters, in the range of 0.4-4 yg/m3.  Consi-
derably higher levels have been reported, however.

4.4.2  Aquatic Levels and Pathways

     Direct sources of lead to water are largely unidentified; however,
they include such sources as iron and steel production, lead production,
and coal mining.  Still, indirect sources, such as urban runoff and
atmospheric deposition, are significant sources to aquatic systems.

     Lead reaching surface waters is likely to be strongly sorbed onto
suspended solids and sediments.   Because lead in the sediment is strongly
sorbed, it is unlikely to be desorbed as a result of a physical distur-
bance.  Changes in the water chemistry, for example, pH, could result
in an increased solubilization of lead.  Lead found in the water columns
is expected to be strongly complexed by organic molecules.  Lead can
bioconcentrate in aquatic organisms up to 2-4 orders of magnitude above
water concentrations.  It appears to be fairly persistent in aquatic
biota, with a lifetime of at least several months.  Little evidence
suggests biomagnification of lead in aquatic food chains.

     Typical levels of lead in U.S. waters are less than 25 yg/1.   Levels
of lead in seawater are considerably lower, on the order of 0.005 yg/1.
Lead concentrations in surface waters were higher in urban areas than in
rural areas.

     Sediments contain considerably higher levels of lead than surface
waters.  Coastal lead sediment contains approximately 100 mg/kg, while
the average lead in river sediments was estimated to be about 20 mg/kg.
Higher concentrations were found in STORET data,  with mean concentrations
ranging from 27 to 267 mg/kg,  during 1973-79.

4.4.3  Terrestrial Levels and Pathways

     A large amount of lead (47%) enters the environment annually in the
form of solid waste, primarily from lead production and the disposal of
lead-containing products.  In addition, a large amount of lead reaches
the soil as a result of atmospheric deposition.

     Lead transported to soil is quite strongly sorbed, and, under most
conditions, is not subject to leaching.  The movement of lead with the
erosion of soil particles is likely, however.   Entrainment of soil
particles is also a possible route of lead transport.  In addition,
uptake of lead into plants can occur, although only a small portion of
                                  4-46

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 the total lead in any soil is available for plant uptake.  Bioconcen-
 tration factors are generally less than 1, although they may be slightly
 higher in the roots.


      Because of the characteristics of the New Lead Belt, the production
 of  lead in that.area has  apparently not resulted in elevated levels of
 lead from tailings  or solid wastes.  The waters in the area are highly
 buffered and neutral to basic.   In addition,  control of a dam in the
 area prevents lead  accumulation in the sediment of the immediate area
 Groundwater contamination from  tailing ponds  and fly ash ponds does not
 appear to be significant  for lead,  although it has occurred in some
cases.
     Lead is common in municipal waste, because  it  is  found  in  numerous
domestic and commercial products.  However,  its  movement  is  controlled
by adsorption to clay and precipitation.


     Monitoring data for lead in soils largely reflect airborne deposi-
tion patterns.  An average concentration for lead in U.S. soils appears
to be about 20 mg/kg in uncontaminated soils.  Elevated concentrations
are found in the vicinity of highways (up to 7600 mg/kg), and,  in general,
in urban areas where a range of 100-800 mg/kg lead in soil is found.
Elevated concentrations are also found in the vicinity of smelters  (up
to about 8000 mg/kg), in the vicinity of houses that at one time were
painted with lead-containing paints,  and in old orchard soils.  Urban
dust is also found to contain high levels of lead.  Concentrations of
about 1000-1600 mg/kg are found in urban residential areas and 1400-
2400 mg/kg in commercial areas.
                                  4-47

-------
                              REFERENCES

Adams,  E.S.   Effects  of  lead  and  hydrocarbons  from snowmobile exhaust
on  brook  trout  (Salvelinus  fontinalis).   Trans.  Am.  Fish.  Soc.  104(2):
363-373;  1975.

Anderson, R.V.   The effects of  lead  on  oxygen  uptake in the crayfish,
Oronectes virilis  (HAGEN).  Bull.  Environ.  Contain.  Toxicol.  20:394-400;
1978.

Anderson, R.V.;  Vinikour, W.S.; Brower,  J.E.   The  distribution  of  Cd,
Cu, Pb  and Zn in the  biota of two freshwater sites  with different  trace
metal inputs.  Holarctic  Ecology  1:377-384; 1978.

Andren, A.W.; Lindberg,  S.E.; Bate,  L.C.  Atmospheric input and geo-
chemical  cycling of selected  trace elements in Walker Branch Water Shed,
Oak Ridge, Tenn.   Pub. No.  728.   Oak Ridge, TN:  Oak Ridge National
Laboratories; 1975.   (As  cited  by U.S.  EPA  1977a)

Armstrong, F.A.J.; Atkins, W.R.G.  J. Mar.  Biol. Assoc.  UK 29:139-144;
1950.   (As cited by Wong _et al. 1978)

Arthur  D. Little Inc.; Sources  of toxic pollutants  in influents
to  sewage treatment plants. IV. Integrated  interpretation, part 1.
Washington,  DC:  U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency;  1979.


Atkins,  P.R.; Kruger,  P.   The natural removal of lead pollutants from a
suburban atmosphere.   Technical Report No. 98.   Standord,  CA:  Federal
Water Pollution Control Administration; 1968.   (As cited by U.S. EPA
1977b)

Bagley,  G.E.; Locke,  L.N.  The occurrence of lead in tissues of wild
birds.   Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  2(5):297-305; 1967.   (As cited
by U.S.  EPA 1976)

Banus,  M.; Valiela, I.; Teal,  J.M.  Export of lead from salt marshes.
Mar. Poll. Bull.  5(l):6-9; 1974.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1978)

Bell, M.A.;  Ewing,  R.A.;  Lutz, G.A.;  Holoman,  V.L.; Paris,  B.; Krause,  H.H.
Reviews  of the environmental effects of pollutants:  VII. Lead.   Cincinnati,
OH:   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency; 1978.

Bertine, K.K.; Mendeck, M.P.  Industrialization of New Haven, Connecticut,
as recorded in reservoir sediments.  Environ.  Sci.  Technol. 12(2):201-207;
1978.

Bertinson, J.R.;  Clark, C.S.  Lead content of soils from urban housing.
Interface 6:1073-1076; 1973.  (As cited by Nriagu 1978a)

Biggins, P.D.E.; Harrison, R.M.  Chemical speciation of lead components
in streets dusts.  Environ.  Sci. Technol. 14(3):336-339; 1980.

Bogden,  J.D.; Louria,  D.B.  Soil contamination from lead in paint chips.
Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  14(3):389-394;  1975.  (As  cited by
U.S. EPA 1978)

                                  4-43

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 Bolter, E.; Butz, T.; Arseneau, J.F.  Geochemical  effects  of  lead
 smelters on the environment.  Trace Substances  in  Environ.  Health
 9:107-112; 1975.  (As cited by Nriagu 1978a)


 Bowen, H.J.  Trace elements in biochemistry.  New  York, NY:   Academic
 Press; 1966.  241 p.  (As cited by Nriagu 1978a)


 Bowen, V.T.; Sutton, D.  J. Mar. Res. 10:153-167;  1951.   (As  cited  bv
 Wong et al 1978)


 Bradford,  G.R.   Trace elements in the water resources of California.
 Hilgardia 41:45-53;  1971.  (As cited by Chow 1978a)


 Bryan, E.H.  Concentrations of lead in urban storm water.  J. Water
 Pollut. Control Fed. 46:2419-2431;  1974.  (As cited by Chow 1978a)


 Bryan, G.W.;  Uysal,  H.   Heavy metals in the burrowing bivalve
 Scrobicularia plana  from the Tamar estuary in relation to environ-
 mental levels.   J. Mar.  Biol.  Assoc.  58:89;  1978.  (As cited by Leland
 .et al.  1979).


 Chamberlain,  A.C.; Clough,  W.S.;  Heard,  M.J.;  Newton, D.; Stott, A.N.B.;
 Wells,  A.C.  Uptake  of  inhaled lead from motor exhaust.   Postgrad. Med.
 J.  51:790-794;  1975.   (As cited by  U.S.  EPA 1977a)


 Chau,  Y.K.; Wong, P.T.S.; Bengert,  G.A.; Kramar, 0.  Determination of
 tetraalkyllead  compounds in water,  sediment,  and fish samples.  Analvt
 Chem.  51(2):186-188;  1979.


 Chian,  E.S.K.;  DeWalle,  F.B.   Evaluation of  leachate  treatment.   Vol. 1.
 Characterization of  leachate.   Report  No.  EPA-6001-2-77-186a.   Washington,
 DC:  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency; 1977.


 Chisolm, D.; Bishop,  R.E.   Phytoprotection 48:78-81;  1967.   (As  cited by
 Nriagu 1978a)


 Chloride Overseas, Ltd.   Effluent treatment at battery factories.  The
 Battery Man 8;  1971.


 Cholak, J.; Schafer,  L.J.;  Sterling, T.D.  Atmospheric concentrations of
 lead.   J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 11:281-288;  1961.  (As  cited by
 Nriagu  1978a)


 Chow, T.J.  Isotope analysis of seawater by mass spectrometry.   J. Water
 Poll. Contr. Fed. 40(3,Pt.l):399-411; 1973.


 Chow, T.J.   Lead in the hydrosphere.  Pure & Appl.  Chem.  50:395:405;  1978.


 Chow, T.J.   Lead in natural waters.   Nriagu,  J.O. ed.   The biogeochemistry
of lead in the environment.   New York, NY:  Elsevier/North Holland Bio-
medical Press;  1978a.

                                  4-49

-------
 Chow,  T.J.;  Earl,  J.L.   Lead and uranium in Pennsylvania anthracite.
 Science  169:577-580;  1970.   (As  cited by Nriagu 1978 a)

 Chow,  T.J.;  Earl,  J.L.;  Snyder,  C.B.   Lead aerosol baseline:   concentra-
 txon at  White Mountain and  Laguna Mountain,  California.   Science 178
 (4059):401-402;  1972.

 Chow,  T.J.;  Bruland,  K.W.;  Bertine, K.;  Soutar,  A.;  Koide,  M. ;
 Goldberg, E.D.   Lead  pollution.   Records in  Southern California
 sediments.   Science 181:551-552;  1973.   (As  cited  in Nriagu 1978a)

 Chow,  T.J.;  Snyder, C.B.; Earl,  J.L.   In:  Isotope ratios as pollutant
 source and behavior indicators.   Vienna:   IAEA;  1975.  95-108.   (As
 cited  by Nriagu  1978a)

 Clark, D.R.  Lead  concentrations:  bats  vs.  terrestrial  small mammals
 collected near a major highway.   Env.  Sci. Technol.  13(3):338-341; 1979.


 Coggins, A.J.; Tuckwell, K.D.; Byrne, R.E.   An investigation of  the
 heavy metal  content of the water  and  sediments in  a  reservoir supplv
 drinking water to  a major mining  center.  Environ. Sci.  Technol.  13(10)-
 1281-1285; 1979.

 Colucci, J.M.; Begeman, C.R.; Kumler, K.  Lead concentrations in  Detroit,
New York, and Los Angeles air.  J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 19:255-260;
 1969.   (As cited by Nriagu 1978b)

Connor, J.J.; Shacklette, H.T.  Background geochemistry  of  some rocks,
soils,  plants, and vegetables in  the  conterminous United States.
Washington,  DC:   U.S.  Geological  Survey Professional Paper  574-F; 1975.
 (As cited by U.S. EPA 1978)

Corrin, N.L.; Natusch, D.F.S.  Physical and chemical characteristics of
environmental lead.  In:   Lead in the environment.   Washington, DC:
National Science Foundation; 1977:7-31.

 DeTreville,  R.T.P.  Natural occurrence  of lead.   Arch.  Environ.  Health
 8:212; 1964.  (As  cited by Zimdahl and Hassett 1977)

 Drifmeyer, J.E.; Odum, W.E.   Lead, zinc, and manganese,  in  dredge-spoil
 pond ecosystems.   Environ. Conserv. 2(l):39-45;  1975.

 Durum, W.H.; Hem,  J.D.; Heidel, S.G.  Reconnaissance of  selected  minor
 elements in  surface waters of the United States.  U.S. Geol. Survey
 Circular 643; 1971.  49 p.   (As cited by Chow 1978a)
                                  4-50

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
 Edgington, D.N.; Robbins, J.A.   Records  of  lead  deposition in Lake
 Michigan sediments since 1800.   Environ.  Sci.  Technol.  10:266-274- 1976
 (As cited by Chow 1978)


 Elfving, D.C.; Haschek, W.M.; Stehn, R.A.;  Bache,  C.A.;  Lisk,  D.J.
 Heavy metal residues in plants cultivated on and  in  small  mammals
 indigenous to old orchard soils.  Arch.  Environ.  Health, pp.  75-99-
 March/April 1978.


 Elfving, D.C.; Bache, C.A.; Lisk, D.J.   Lead content of vegetables,
 millet, and apple trees grown on soils amended with colored newsprint.
 J. Agric. Food Chem. 27(1):138-140; 1979.


 Elias, R.W.; Hinkley, T.; Hirao, Y.; Patterson, C.  Geochim. Cosmochim.
 Acta 40:583; 1976.   (As cited by Settle and Patterson 1980)


 Fitchko, J.; Hutchinson, T.C.  A comparative study of heavy metal  con-
 centrations in river mouth sediments around the Great Lakes.  J. Great
 Lakes Res.  1:46-78;  1975.  (As cited by Rickard and Nriagu 1978)


 Fleischer,  M.   In:   Cycling and control of metals.  Curry,  M.G.;
 Gigliotti,  G.M.  eds.   Proc.  Environ.  Resource Conf.,  Cincinnati, OH:
 National Environ. Res.  Center; 1973.   3-10.   (As cited by Chow 1978)


 Fochtman,  E.G.;  Haas,  W.R.   Evaluation of lead  plant  x^astewater treat-
 ment methods.   Denver,  CO:   Battery Council  International Convention;
 1972.


 Gale,  N.L.;  Wixson,  B.C.   Cadmium in forest  ecosystems around  lead
 smelters in  Missouri.   Env.  Health Persp. 28:23-37; 1979.


 Gale,  N.L.;  Wixson, G.G.;  Hardie, M.G.;  Jennett,  J.C.   Aquatic organisms
 and heavy metals  in Missouri's Jew Lead  Belt.   Water  Resources Bull
 9:673-688; 1973.


 Giles,  F.E.; Middleton,  S.G.;  Grau,  J.G.   Evidence for  the  accumulation
 of atmospheric lead by  insects in areas  of high traffic  density.   Environ.
 Entomol.  2(2):299-300;  1973.   (As cited  by U.S.  EPA 1978)


 Gire, M.P.,  Narbonne, J.F.;  Serfaty, A.  J.  Europ.  Toxicol. 7-98-103-
 1974.   (As cited by Wong jet_ al. 1978)


Gish, C.D.,  Christensen, R.E.  Cadmium, nickel, lead, and zinc in earth-
worms from roadside soil.  Environ. Sci. Technol. 7(11):1060-1062-  1973
 (As cited by U.S.  EPA 1978)


Graham, D.L.   Trace metal levels in intertidal mollusks of California.
Veliger 14(4):365-372;  1972.   (As cited by U.S.  EPA 1978)
                                 4-51

-------
Gullvag, B.M.   Subcellular  localization  of  polluting metals in roadside
earthworms  exposed  to  traffic  exhaust  gases.   Cytobios  22:141-153;  1978.


Habibi,  K.  Characterization  of particulate matter  in  vehicle exhaust.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 7(3):223-234; 1973.

Hardisty, M.W. ; Kortar, S. ; Sainsbury, M.   Man. Pollut.  Bull.  5:61-63;
1974.   (As  cited by Wong et al. 1978)

Harrison, G.F.  The caviat incident.   In:   Proceedings  of  the  inter-
national experts discussion on lead — occurrence, fate  and pollution
in the marine environment.  Rovini, Yugoslavia; 1977.

Harrison, R.M.;  Laxen,  D.P.H.   Sink processes for tetraalkyllead com-
pounds in the atmosphere.   Environ. Sci.  Technol.  12(13):1384-1392;
1978.

Harrison, R.M.;  Perry,  R.   The analysis of  tetraalkyllead compounds and
their significance as urban air pollutants.   Environ. Sci.'Technol.
ll(9):847-852; 1977.

Haschek, W.M.; Lisk, D.J.; Stehn, R.A.  Accumulation of  lead in rodents
from two old orchard sites in  New York.  Washington,  DC:  National
Academy of  Sciences; 1979:192-199..

Hemphill, D.D.; Marienfeld, C.J.; Reddy, R.S.; Heidlage, W.D.;  Pierce,  J.O.
Toxic heavy metals in vegetables and forage grasses  in Missouri's lead
belt.   J. AOAC 56(4):974-988;  1971.

Hirao,  Y.;  Patterson,  C.C.  Lead aerosol pollution in the  High Sierras
overrides natural mechanisms which exclude  lead from a  food chain.
Science 184:989-992; 1974.

Holcombe, G.W.; Benoit, D.A.;  Leonard, E.N.; McKim,  J.M.   Long-term
effects of  lead exposure on three generations  of brook  trout (Salvelinus
fontinalis).  J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33(8):1731-1741;  1976.

Huang,  C.P.; Elliott, H.A.; Ashmead, R.M.;  Interfacial  reactions and the
fate of heavy metals in soil-water systems.  J. Water Poll.  Contr.  Fed.
49(5):745-756; 1977.

Hutchinson, .T.C.  Lead pollution, the  automobile and health.   Publ. No.
EF-5.   Toronto:  University of Toronto, The Institute of Environmental
Sciences and Engineering; 1973:1-10.

Iskander, I.K.; Keeney, D.R.  Environ.  Sci.  Technol.   8:165-170; 1974.
(As cited by Nriagu 1978a)
                                   4-52

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
 Jackson,  D.R.;  Watson,  A.P.   Disruption of nutrient pools and transport
 of heavy  metals in a forested watershed near a lead smelter.  J. Environ.
 Qual.  6(4):331-338:  1977.



 Jennett,  J.C.;  Foil, J.L.   Trace metal transport from mining, milling
 and smelting watersheds.   JWPCF 51(2):378-404; 1979.


 Jennett,  J.D.;  Linnemann,  S.M.  Disposal of lead and zinc containing
 wastes on soils.   J. Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 49(8):1842-1856; 1977.


 Jennett,  J.C.;  Wixson,  B.C.;  Lowsley,  I.H.; Purushothaman, K.; Bolter, E. ;
 Hemphill,  D.D.; Gale, N.L.;  Tranter, W.H.   Transport and distribution from
 mining, milling and  smelting  operations in a forest ecosystem.   In:  Lead
 in the environment.   Washington, DC:   National Science Foundation;  1977:
 135-178.


 Kahn,  M.A.Q.; Coello, W.F.;  Saleem,  Z.A.   Lead content of soils  along
 Chicago's  Eisenhower and  Loop-Terminal expressways.   Arch. Environ.
 Contain. Toxicol.  1 (,3): 209-223; 1973.   (As  cited by U.S.  EPA 1978)


 Kauranen,  P.; Jarvenpaa,  T.   Biological half-times of 210po and  210PB
 in some marine  organisms.  Annual Report.   Helsinki:  University of
 Helsinki,  Department of Radiochemistry; 1972.   (As cited by Wong et al.
 1978)


 Kemp,  A.L.W.; Dell,  C.I.  A preliminary comparison of  the  composition of
 bluffs and sediments  from Lake Ontario, Erie,  and  Huron.   Can. J. Earth
 Sci. 13:1070-1081; 1976.   (As  cited by  Nriagu  1978a)


 Kleinsman, M.T.; Kneips, T.J.; Berstein, D.M.;  Eisenbud, M.   Fallout  of
 toxic  trace metals in New York City.  Drucker,  H.; Wildung,  R.E. eds.
 Biological implications as metals in the environment.  Proceedings  of
 the fifteenth annual  Hanford  life science  symposium; at Richland WA

 September 26, 1977.

 Koeppe, D.E.  The uptake,  distribution  and effect  of cadmium and lead
 in plants.  The Sci.   Total Environ. 7(3):197-206;  1977.


 Koirtyohann, S.R.; Wixson, B.C.; Edwards, H.W.  Krenkel, P.A. ed.  Heavy
metals in the aquatic environment.  New York, NY:  Pergamon  Press; 1975:
 243-246.


Kopfler, F.C.;  Mayer, J.  Concentrations of five trace metals in the
waters and oysters of Mobile Bay, Alabama.  Proc. Natl. Shellfish Assoc.
 63:27-34;  1973.   (As  cited by U.S. EPA  1978)


Kopp, J.F.  Hemphill, D.C. ed.  Trace substances in environmental health.
Columbia,  MO:  University of Missouri;   1969:  111:59.


 Kopp,  J.F.; Kroner,  R.C.  Trace  metals  in waters of  the United States.
 Cincinnati, OH:  Federal Water Pollution Control Administration; 1967.



                                   4-53

-------
 Korninga,  P.  Quart.  Rev.  Biol.  27:  266-308;  1952 (As cited by Wong et al
 1978).                                                              	

 Lagerwerff,  J.V.   In:   Agriculture  and the quality of our environment.
 Publ. No.  85.   Washington,  DC:   American Association for the Advancement
 of  Science;  1967.   (As  cited in Zimdahl and Hassett 1977)

 Laveskog (1971),  A method for determining tetrancthyl lead (T1IL) and
 tetraethyl lead (TEL)  in air.  Proceedings of the Second International
 Union of Air Pollution  Prevention Associations, Washington, DC.  Paper
 No-CP-371).   New  York,  New York: Academic Press; 1971: 549-557  (As cited
 by  USEPA 1977a).

 Lazrus,  A.L.; Lorange,  E.;  Lodge, J.P. Jr.  Lead and other metal ions in
 United  States precipitation.  Environ. Sci.  Technol. 4:55-58; 1970.
 (As cited in Chow 1978a)

 Lehninger, A.L.  Biochemistry.   New York, NY:  Worth Publishers, Inc.;
 1970.   833 p.

 Leland,  H.V.; McNurney, J.M.  Lead  transport in a river ecosystem.
 Preprint of paper presented at  the  international conference on transport
 of  persistent chemicals in aquatic  ecosystems.   National Research Council
 of  Canada; 1974.

 Leland,  H.V.  est _al.  Bioaccumulation and toxicity of heavy metals and
 related  trace elements.  J.  Water Poll. Contr.  Fed. 51(6):1592-1616-
 1979.

 Little,  P.; Martin,  M.H.  A survey  of zinc,  lead and cadmium in soil
 and natural vegetation  around a smelting complex.   Environ.  Pollut.
 3:241-254;  1972.   (As cited  by  U.S.  EPA 1977a)

 Livingstone,  D.A.  Fleischer, M.  ed.   Data of geochemistry.   6th ed.
 U.S. Geol.  Survey Prof. Paper No. 440-G;  1964.   64  p.   (As  cited by
 Chow 1978)

Mancy, K.H. ed.  Instrumental analysis  for water pollution  control.
Ann Arbor, MI:  Ann Arbor Science; 1971.   343 p.  (As  cited by
Chow 1978)

Marietta, G.P.; Gabrielli, L.F.; Favretto, L.  Pollution of mussels by
particulate lead from sea water.  Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch 168:181-184;


Martin,  H.W.; Mills, W.R.   Water pollution caused by inactive ore and
mineral mines ~ a national assessment.  Cincinnati, OH:  U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency; 1976.  Available from NTIS, Springfield,
VA;  So 264 956.
                                  4-54

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
            Martin, W.E.  Mercury and  lead residues  in  starlings  —  1970.   Pest
            Monit. J. 6(l):27-32; 1972.   (As  cited by U.S.  EPA 1978)


            Mathis, B.J.; Cummings, T.F.  Distribution  of selected metals  in bottom
            sediments.  J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed. 45(7):1573-1583;  1973   (As •
            cited by Chow 1978)"


            Mclntosh, A.; Bishop, W.  Distribution and effects  of heavy metals  —
            a contaminated lake.  Publ. No. 85.  Lafayette,  IN:  Purdue University,
            Water Resources Research Center; 1976.


            McMullen, T.P.;  Faoro, R.B.; Morgan, G.B.  Profile  of pollutant  faction
            in nonurban suspended particulate matters.   J. Air  Pollut. Contr. Assoc
            20:369-372;  1970.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1978c)


            Mink,  L.L.;  Williams, R.E.; Wallace, A.T.  Effect of early day mining
            operations on present day water quality.  Groundwater 10(l):17-26; 1972.


            Mor,  E.D.; Beccaria,  A.M.   A dehydration method  to avoid loss of trace
            elements  in  biological samples.   In:  Proceedings of international
            experts discussion on lead — occurrence, fate and pollution in the
            marine environment.   Rovini,  Yugoslavia;  1977.


            Morel, F.M.M.; Westall,  J.C.;  O'Melia,  C.R.;  Morgan, J.J.   Fate of trace
            metals in  Los Angeles County  Wastewater Discharge.   Environ  Sci
            Technol.  9(8):756-761; 1975.


            Motto, H.L.; Daines,  R.H.;  Chilko,  D.M.;  Motto,  C.K.  Lead in  soils  and
            plants:  its relation to  traffic volume and  proximity  to  highways
            Environ. Sci. Technol. 4:231-237;  1970.   (As  cited  by  Nriagu  1978a)


            Namminga,  H.E.; Scott, J.E.; Burks,  S.L.  Proc.  Okla. Acad.  Sci.  54:62-
            64; 1974.   (As cited  by Wong et al.  1978)


            National Academy of Sciences  (NAS).  Airborne lead  in perspective.
            Washington, DC:  National Academy of Sciences; 1972.  29 p.  (As  cited
            Dy U • o • EjrA 1978)


            Newton, C.D.; Shepard, W.W.; Coleman, M.S.  J. Water Pollut. Contr   Fed
            46:999-1000; 1974.   (As cited by Chow 1978a)


•         Nriagu, J.O.   Lead in soils, sediments and major rock types   NriAo,,  T n
•         ed   The biogeochemistry of lead in the environmentParTI.'  EcoScai
           cycles.  New York,  NY:  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press; 1978^
I

I

I
                                            4-55

-------
 Nriagu, J.O.  Lead in the atmosphere.  Nriagu, J.O. ed.  The biogeochem-
 istry of lead in the environment.  Part A.  Ecological cycles.  New York,
 NY.  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press; 1978b:  137-184.

 O'Brien, J.; Barry, E.F.; Rei, M.T.; Reynolds, H.H.  Atmospheric lead
 content of eastern Massachusetts.  Environ. Lett. 8:297-302; 1975.
 (As cited by Nriagu 1978b)

 Oliver, B.C.;  Cosgrove,  E.G.   The efficiency of heavy metal removal by
 a conventional activated sludge treatment plant.   Water Res. 8(11)-
 869-874; 1974.

 Olson,  K.W.;  Skogerboe,  R.K.   Identification of soil lead compounds from
 automotive sources.  Environ.  Sci.  Technol. 9(3):227-230; 1975.  (As
 cited by U.S.  EPA 1977a)

 Page,  A.L.;  Ganje,  T.J.   Accumulations of lead in soils for regions of
 high and low motor vehicle traffic  density.  Environ.  Sci.  Technol.
 4:140-142;  1970.   (As cited by Nriagu 1978a)

 Pagenkopf,  G.K.;  Neuman,  D.R.   Lead concentrations in native trout.
 Bull.  Environ.  Contain. Toxicol.  12(l):70-75; 1974.

 Pakkala, I.S.;  White, M.N.; Burdick, G.E.; Harris, E.G.;  Lisk, D.J.
 A survey of the lead content  of fish from 49 New York State waters.
 Pestic. Monit.  J. 5:348.355;  1972.  (As cited by Bell et al 1979).

 Patterson, C.C.   Lead.  Arch.  Environ.  Health  11:344-360; 1965.   (As
 cited by Nriagu  1978b)

 Patterson, C.C.   Mar. Chem. 2:69:84;  1974.   (As cited by  Chow  1978a)

Patterson, C.C.;  Settle,  D.; Glover,  B.  Analysis  of lead in polluted
coastal  seawater.  Mar. Chem.  4:305-319; 1976.  (As cited by Chow 1978)


Perhac,  R.M.  Water transport of heavy metals  in solution and by differ-
ent  sizes of particulate solids.  Research  Report  No. 32.  Knoxville,
TN:  Tennessee University, Water Resources  Research Center; 1974.
Available from:   NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB  232 427.

Peterson, J.O.   A study of lead in lake sediments.  Thesis, Univ. of
Wisconsin, Madison, 1973.   (As cited by Nriagu 1978a)

Peterson, P.J.   Lead and  vegetation.  Nriagu, J.O. ed.  The biogeochemi-
stry of lead in the environment.  Part A.   Ecological cycles.  New York,
NY:  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press; 1978.
                                  4-56

-------
I
I
           •Phillips,  G.R.; Russo, R.C.  Metal bioaccumulation in fishes and aquatic
           invertebrates:   a literature review.  Report No. EPA-600/3-78-103.
           Washington,  DC:  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency 1978
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
|
           T^°1^e:  ^•^1;  Haney' A>   Institute  of Environmental  Studies  Report  No
           UILU-IES-75-0001.  Urfaana,  IL:  University  of  Illinois;  1975.   133  n
•         (As  cited by  Nriagu 1978a)                                          P<
I
I
 Price,  R.E.;  Knight,  L.A.   Mercury,  cadmium,  lead,  and arsenic in sedi-
 ments,  plankton,  and  clams  from Lake Washington and Sardis Reservoir
 Mississippi.   Pest. Monit.  J.  11(4):182-189;  1978.
 Price,  P.W.;  Rathcke, B.J.; Gentry,  D.A.  Lead in terrestrial anthropoH-
 evidence  for  biological concentration.   Environ, Entomol.  (3)- 370-372-
 1974.   (As  cited  in U.S.  EPA 1978)
 Pringle,  B.H.;  Hissong,  D.E.;  Katz,  E.L.;  Mulawka,  S.T.   Trace metal
 accumulation  by estuarine mollusks.   J.  Sanit.  Eng.  Div.  Am.  Soc.  Civ.
 Eng.  94:455-475;  1968.   (As cited by Wong  e£  al. 1978)
 Proctor,  P.O.;  Kisvarsanyi,  G.;  Garrison,  E.; Williams,  A.  Hemphill,  D.D.
 ed.   Trace  substances in environmental health.   VII.   Columbia,  MO:   Univer-
 sity  of Missouri;  1974:   57-61.
 Ragaini,  R.C.;  Ralston,  H.R.;  Roberts, N.   Environmental  trace metal
 contamination in  Kellogg, Idaho, near a lead  smelting  complex.   Environ.
 Sci.  Technol.  11(8):773-781;  1977.
 Rameau. J.  Th.  L.B.   In:  Environmental health  aspects of  lead.
 Luxembourg:   Commission  of  European  Communities;  1973:  189-197.
 (As cited by  Nriagu 1978a)
 Ray,  S.  Bioaccumulation of  lead in  Atlantic  salmon  (Salmo salar).
 Bull. Environ.  Contam. Toxicol. 19:631-636; 1978.
 Reichert, W.L.; Federighi, D.A.; Malins, D.C.   Uptake  and  metabolism of
 lead and cadmium in coho salmon (Qncorhynchus kisutch).  Comp. Biochem.
 Physiol. 63C:229-234;  1979.
 Rickard, D.T.; Nriagu, J.O.   Aqueous environmental chemistry of lead.
Nriagu, J.O. ed.  The biogeochemistry of lead in  the environment.  Part A.
 Ecological cycles.  New York, NY:  Elsevier/North Holland  Biomedical
Press; 1978:  219-283.

       , R.D.; Johnson, M.S.; Hotton, M.   Environ. Pollut.  15-61-69-
       (As cited by Clark 1979)                                   9'
                                4-57

-------
 Roulier,  M.H.   Research on containment movement in soils.  Cincinnati,
 OH:   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency; 1975.

 Sartor, J.D.;  Boyd,  G.B.   Water pollution aspects of street surface
 contaminants.   Report No.  EPA-R2-72-081.   Washington, DC:  U.S. Environ-
 mental Protection Agency;  1972.

 Scanlon,  P.F.   Lead  contamination of mammals and invertebrates near
 highways  with  different traffic volumes.   Washington, DC:  National
 Academy of Sciences;  1978.

 Scanlon,  P.F.;  O'Brien,  T.G.;  Schauer,  N.L.; Coggin,  J.L.;  Steffen, D.E.
 Bull. Environ.  Contain.  Toxicol. ;  1978.   (As cited by Scanlon et al.
 1979)

 Scanlon,  P.F.;  O'Brien,  T.G.;  Schauer,  N.L.; Oderwald,  R.G.   Lead
 levels in primary feathers  of  American  woodcocks harvested  by hunters
 throughout the United States range.   Bull. Environ.  Contain.  Toxicol.
 21:683-688;  1979.

 Schell, W.R.;  Barnes,  R.S.  Rubin,  A.J. ed.  Aqueous  environmental
 chemistry  of metals.   Ann Arbor,  MI:  Ann Arbor Science Publishers;
 1974:  129-169.   (As  cited  by  Wong  et al.  1978)

 Schlesinger, W.H.; Reiners, W.A.; Knopman,  D.S.   Heavy  metal  concentra-
 tions and  deposition  in bulk precipitation in montane ecosystems  of New
 Hampshire, USA.   Environ. Pollut. 6:39-47;  1974.   (As cited by  Chow
 1978)

 Schroeder, H.A.   The poisons around us.   Bloomington, IN:  Indiana Uni-
 versity Press; 1974.    (As cited by  Nriagu 1978a)

 Schubert,   J.  Chemical specificity in biological  interactions.  Gurd,  R.N.
 ed.  New York, NY:  Academic Press; 1954:   114-163.

 Schuck,  E.A.; Locke,  J.K.  Relationship of  automotive lead particulates
 to certain consumer crops.  Environ. Sci.  Technol. 4(4):324-330;  1970.

 Schulz-Baldes, M.  Mar. Biol.  25:177-193;  1974.   (As  cited by Wong et  al.
 1978)                                                              	

 Schwimer,   S.R.  Trace metal levels in three subtidal  invertebrates.
Veliger 16(1):95-102; 1973.  (As cited by U.S. EPA 1978)

 Sehmel,  G.A.; Hodgson, W.H.   Predicted dry  deposition velocities.
Proceedings of the synposium on atmosphere — surface exchange of
particulate and gaseous pollutants.  ERDA Symposium Series 38.  Richland,
WA; 1976:   399-422.  (As cited by U.S. EPA  1978).

Serne, R.J.  Geochemical distribution of selected trace metals in  San
Francisco  Bay sediments.  Drucker, H.; Wildung, R.E.   eds.  Biological
implications of metals in the environment; 1977.


                                 4-58

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
           Settle, D.M. ; Patterson, C.C.  Lead in albacore:  guide  to  lead pollution
           in Americans.  Science 207:1167-1176; 1980.


           Siccania, T.G. ; Smith, W.H. ; Mader, D.L.  Changes in lead, copper,  dry
           and weight and organic matter content of the forest floor of white pine
           stands in central Massachusetts over 16 years.  Environ. Sci. Technol
           14(l):54-56; 1980.


           Smith, W.H.   Metal contamination of urban woody plants.  Environ.  Sci.
           Technol. 7:631;  1973.  (As cited by Smith 1976)


           Smith, W.H.   Lead contamination of the roadside ecosystem.  J.  Air
           Pollut.  Contr.  Assoc. 26(8) : 753-766; 1976.



           Sommers,  L.E.; Nelson,  D.W. ;  Terry,  R.E.;  Silviera,  D.J.   Nitrogen and
           metal  contamination  of  natural waters  from  sewage  sludge  disposal on
           land.   Lafayette,  IN:   Purdue University, Resources  Research Center; 1976.


           Spehar,_R.L.; Anderson, R.L.;  Fiandt,  J.T.   Toxicity and  bioaccumulation
           ot  cadmium and lead  in  aquatic invertebrates.   Environ. Pollut.  15:195-
           ZUo ; 1978.



           Stenner,  R.D.; Nickless,  G.   Mar.  Pollut. Bull.  6-89-92-  197S    a    •   ,
           by  Wong  et. _al. 1978)                      »"•>-•>.•  o.oy yz,  iy/5.   (As cited
_









•
•



•



•
I




I



I



I
           Stevenson  F.J.;  Welch,  L.F.   Migration of applied lead in field soil.
           Environ.  Sci.  Technol.  13(10) .-1255-1259;  1979.


           Struempler, A.W.   Trace  element  composition in  atmospheric particulates

           ?0-3l837   1Q7*d th(l  SUmme; f  19?4  at  Chadr°n'  Neb"*ka.   Atmos.  Environ.
           10.33-37;  1976.   (As cited by  Nriagu 1978b)


           Summers, A.O  ; Silver, S.  Microbial transformations  of metals.   Ann.
           Rev. Microbiol.  Annual  Reviews,  Inc;  1978.
                        .' L'S'  A SUrVey °f air and Population  lead  levels  in
          selected American communities.  Final Report.  Cincinnati, OH:  U.S.
          environmental Protection Agency; 1972:  1-73.
                                                    of ™~*°™ *~* P«tlcl«.
                                      : ""' J'N': Brandt> "•  Compositio,, size and
                                                                    . Contr. Assoo.
                                             4-59

-------
 Ter  Haar,  G. ; Aronow,  R.   New information on lead in dirt and dust as
 related  to the  childhood  lead problem.   Environ.  Health Persp.  7:83-89;
 J* j I Q •

 Theis, T.L.; Richter,  R.O.   Chemical  speciation  of heavy metals in power
 plants ash pond leachate.   Environ. Sci.  Technol.  13(2)':219-228;  1972.

 Theis, T.L. ; Westrick, J.D.;  Hsu, C.L.; Marley,  J.J.   Field  investigation
 of trace metals  in groundwater from fly ash  disposal.   J.  Water Pollut
 Contr. Fed.  50(11) : 2457-2469;  1978.

 Thomas, Personal communication;  1976.   (As cited  by Nriagu 1978a)
Tolonen  K   ^*** °f heavy metals on  two  roadside  bogs  in Finland.
Suo 25:77-84; 1974.   (As cited by Nriagu  1978a)

long  S.C.; Young, W.D.; Gutermann, Witt,; Lisk, D.C.  Trace Metals  in
Lake Cayuga lake trout  (Salvelinus namaycush) in relation to  a*e
J. Fish Res. Bd. Can. 31:238-239; 1974  (As cited by Bell et al°1979).

-*.S. Department of the  Interior  (U.S. DI) .  Nontoxic shot regulations
for hunting water foul, 1980-1981.  Washington D.C. : Fish and Wildlife
Service, U.S. Department of the  Interior, 1979.


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (U.S. EPA) Helena Valley Montana,
area environmental pollutant study.  Publication No. AP-91. Research
Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency; 1972  (As cited  in U.S. EPA 1978).


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Air  quality criteria
for lead.  Report No. EPA 600/8-77-017.  Washington, DC:  U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency; 1977a.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- (U.S. EPA).  The  prevalence of  sub-
surface migrations of hazardous  chemical substances at  selected indus-
trial waste disposal sites.   Washington, DC:   U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency; 1977b.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Information  for proposed
general pretreatment regulations.  EPA Report No.  40 CFR 403.   Washington,
DC:  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency; 1977c.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Reviews of  the environ-
mental effects of pollutants:   VII.   Lead.  Washington, DC:   Office of
Research and Development,  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency; 1978.


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Development document
for effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the pulp and paper
industry.   Washington, D.C.:   Effluent Guidelines  Division,  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency;  1979.

                                 4-60

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (U.S. EPA).  STORET.  Washington,
 DC:  Monitoring and Data Support Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency; 1980.


 Varanasi, U.; Gmur, D.J.  Influence of water-borne and dietary calcium
 on uptake and retention of lead by coho salmon  (Oncorhynchus kisutch).
 Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 46:65-75; 1978.



 Versar,  Inc.   Statement  of probable fate of lead.   McLean, VA:   Versar,
 Inc.  1979.


 Vuceta, J.; Morgan, J.J.  Chemical modeling of  trace metals in fresh-
 waters:  role of complexation and adsorption.   Environ.  Sci. Technol.
 12(12):1302-1308; 1978.


 Ward, N.I.; Reeves, R.D.; Brooks, R.R.  Effect  of lead from motor  vehicle
 exhausts on  trees along a major thoroughfare in Palmerston North,  New
 Zealand.  N.Z. J. Sci. 18:261-267; 1975.


 Warren, H.V.  Biogeochemical prospecting  for lead.  Nriagu, J.O. ed.
 The biogeochemistry of lead in the environment.  Part A.  Ecological
 cycles.  New York, NY:  Elsevier/North Holland  Biomedical Press; 1978.


 Warren, H.V.; Delavault, R.E.; Fletcher,  K.W.   Copper, zinc, and lead
 content of trout livers as an aid in  the  search for favorable areas to
 prospect.  Can. Mining Metall. Bull.  64:34-45;  1971.  (As cited by
 Nriagu 1978a)


 Williams, R.J.P.   Biol.  Rev.  28:381-415;  1953.  (As cited by Wong  et al.
 1978)


 Wixson, B.C.  Biogeochemical cycling  of lead in the new  lead belt  of
 Missouri.  Nriagu, J.O.  ed.  The biogeochemistry of lead  in the environ-
 ment.  Part B.  Biological effects.   New  York,  NY:  Elsevier/North
 Holland Biomedical Press; 1978:119-136.


Wong, P.T.S.; Silverberg, B.A.; Chau, Y.K.; Hodson, P.Y.   Lead and  the
aquatic biota.  Nriagu, J.O. ed.  The biogeochemistry of lead in the
environment.   Part A.   Ecological cycles.  New York, NY:   Elsevier/i
-------
Zimdahl, R.L.; Koeppe, D.E.  Uptake by plants.  Boggess, W.R.; Wixson,
B.C. eds.  Lead in the environment.  Washington, DC:  The National
Science Foundation; 1977:  99-104.

Zimdahl, R.L.; Hassett, J.J.  Lead in soil.  Boggess, W.R.; Wixson,  B.C.
eds.  Lead in the environment.  Washington, DC:  The National Scienc*
Foundation; 1977:  93-98.
 Zimdahl,  R.L.;  McCreary,  D.T.;  Gwynn,  S.M.   Lead uptake by plants -
 the influence of lead source.   Bull.  Environ.  Contain.  Toxicol. 431-435-
 -Ly / o •
                                4-62

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
                              5.0  HUMAN EFFECTS AND EXPOSTTRE
           5.1  HUMAN  TOXICITY

           5.1.1  Introduction
            _    The human health effects of lead have been extensively and inten-
           8^^"V!!Sf"fd; *^:Jeveral ""P-hensive reviews of lead toxi-
           S«trr/ae      i977'  U'S'  EPA 19?7'  Nria§U 1978>"   ^ne of the
           literature,  however,  has demonstrated any natural function of lead in the
           body nor any beneficial  effects.   However,  its pervasive nature in the
           environment  makes  some degree of  exposure inevitable.   This  chapter is
           focused  primarily  on  toxicity data that  are most  useful in the assessment
           of  human exposure  to  lead  and the  consequences of such  exposure.

                The heme-hematopoietic  system,  the  kidney, and the nervous system
           Rare the  three organ systems  that  are major  targets of lead toxicosis.
           Subtle neuro-behavioral  impairments,  such as difficulty in task perfor-
           mance, have  also recently  been  reported  at  blood  lead levels  at which  no
           other symptoms of  lead toxicity are  seen.   These  findings  have resulted
|          in  some  uncertainty in the established maximal permissible daily  intake
•          level for lead.  In 1972, a  joint  FAO/WHO committee  established' a  provi-
           sional tolerable weekly  intake of  3 milligrams for adults  (Mahaffey
                     1Ue °f,?'? milliSrams lead is currently considered the maximum
                1«m8 weekly) Permissible intake from all sources for children
                1971).  Lead concentrations of 80 ug/100 ml of blood or 200 ye/1
          of urine traditionally have served as biologic threshold limit values in
          determining the  safe" levels of occupational exposure.
          5.1.2  Metabolism and Bioac cumulation
               The absorption and metabolism of lead depend on a number of factors
          such as particle size,  physicochemical form of lead, route and extent of'
          exposure, as well as several other factors, such as age and nutritional
          S tclCUS •
          5.1.2.1  Absorption
          inh  .AJforPtion °f lead  can occur through three  exposure routes:   oral,
          inhalation,  and dermal.   In adults,  uptake of  lead  from the  gastrointes-

          1974)  trintvi^8e%f^°m  5 V°%  °f  ±ntake (Keh°e 1961<  Kabinowitz et  al.
          1974 .  In vitro studies with  rats indicate lead crosses the intestinal"
          barrier by a passive  diffusion process  linked  to some  degree to the
          concomitant  movement  of  water  (Coleman  et  al.  1978).   Kehoe  (1961)  con-
          ducted an extensive series  of  balance studies  in human volunteers  for
          periods ranging  from  several months  to  nine  years.  He found that  intake
                                             5-1

-------
 blood lead concentration.  A total dose of 1.3 mg/lead/day, however,
 resulted in a progressive increase in urinary excretion of lead and in
 the lead content of blood and other tissues.   Goyer and Mushak (1977)
 estimate that every 100 milligrams of dietary lead contributes about
 10(6.4-15) milligrams of blood lead per 100 milliliters in adults.

      More recently, attention has been focused on the increased absorption
 of dietary lead by infants and young children (Alexander et_ al. 1973.
 Roels et al.  1978, McCabe 1979).   Alexander and co-workers (1973)  reported
 increased absorption of lead (53%) from the gastrointestinal tract in eight
 normal children between the ages  of 3 months  and 8 years,  although they
 examined a small amount of children.   Similarly high  absorption rates  have
 been noted in young experimental  animals (Rosen and Sorell 1978
 Momcilovic 1978, 1979).

      Animal studies have also revealed several dietary factors that can
 influence gastrointestinal absorption.   Two critical  nutritional require-
 ments for a growing mammal are  the supply  of  calcium  for bone  growth and
 the  supply of iron for  red blood  cell production.   A  reduction of  either
 calcium or iron in the  diet can result  in  an  enhanced absorption of lead
 (Granick et al. 1978, Six and Goyer 1972).  Iron deficiency  in infants
 may  also result in pica and,  thus,  predispose children to  increased lead
 exposure.   Other factors,  such  as  high  intake of dietary fat,  deficiencies
 of^certain vitamins and minerals,  ethanol  ingestion,  stress, strain of
 animal,  etc.,  can  affect  absorption and  the resulting toxicity of  lead in
 experimental  animals  (Barton  and Conrad  1978,  Bushnell et  al.  1979
 Levander 1979,  McCabe 1979, Mykkanen  et  al. 1980).

      Studies  in humans  indicate that  30+10% of  lead inhaled is  deposited
 in the  lungs  (WHO  1977, Tsuchiya 1979) and that  the amount of  lead
 retained will vary  considerably depending on  the size  of the particle
 and  the  depth and  frequency of respiration.   There is  no evidence  that
 lead  accumulates in  the lungs or that all lead retained  is eventually
 absorbed or transferred to  the gastrointestinal  tract  (Tsuchiya 1979).
 An indirect but useful measure of lead deposition and  retention in the
 airways  can be made  from blood lead levels.  A general consensus is  that
 an air lead level of 1 yg Pb/mJ will increase blood lead concentrations
 in adults by approximately 1 ug Pb/100 ml whole blood  (Mahaffey 1977,
WHO 1977).  Such a relationship has not been defined for children.

     Absorption through the skin is only important in the case of  organic
 compounds of lead;  because of their lipid-solubility,  organic lead com-
pounds penetrate skin to a significant degree (Barry 1978).  Inorganic
lead salts do not readily penetrate intact skin.  In an experiment  that
involved the application of lead acetate to the foreheads of eight  male
volunteers, Moore and co-workers (1980) discovered that between 0 and
0.3% of the dose was absorbed.
                                   5-2

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
 I
i
i
i
i
 5.1.2.2  Distribution and Retention

      Absorbed lead is transported by blood and initially distributed
 according to blood distribution patterns;  subsequently, it is redis-
 tributed to various compartments.  Under conditions of continuous  intake
 over a prolonged period of time, a near steady state is achieved with
 respect to intercompartmental distribution.  The kinetics of lead
 distribution and accumulation in humans have not been well defined.
 Rablnowitz and co-workers (1976), however, have examined the distribution
 of lead (^4pb) under dynamic conditions in five healthy men.  The data
 obtained could be explained on the basis of a three-compartment model.
 The first pool, blood,  contains 1.7-2.0 milligrams lead with a lifetime
 of 27-40 (mean 35)  days.   The second pool consists mainly of soft tissues
 It contains 0.3-0.9 milligrams lead and has a lifetime of 30-55 days.   The
 third pool,  composed of  hard tissues (mainly skeleton), contains most of
 the body burden of  lead.

      The accumulation of  lead begins during fetal life.   Lead  is  readily
 transferred across  the placenta and has been detected  in  the human fetus
 as early as  12-14 weeks  of  gestation (Rosen and  Sorell  1978).   Among
 normal individuals, the  total body burden of lead increases from approxi-
 mately 0.2 mg at birth  to values up to 200 mg during a person's lifetime;
 this increase is limited almost entirely to an increasing storage of lead
 in the calcified matrix  of  the bone (Chisolm and Barltrop 1979).   Barry
 (1975,  1978)  estimates  the  total lead content of the body may  reach
 119 mg in women, 165 mg  in  men without occupational exposure to lead,
 and 522 mg in men with occupational lead exposure.

      The concentration of lead  in blood (PbB)  is  of  prime importance in
 the  determination of  recent lead exposure.  Lead  circulating in the  blood
 is principally  (-90%) bound in  a slow diffusable  form in  the erythrocytes;
 the  remainder,  the  diffusable  fraction,  is  in  the plasma  (Butt et_ al.
 1964, Posner 1977).  Recent data suggest that most adult  populations in
 the  United States have mean PbB of about 10-20 yg/100 ml; approximately
 3.5%  of  the adult population may have levels above 30 yg/100 ml (NRC 1980).

      Lead levels  in erythrocyte and plasma  of  75 pregnant women and  their
 infants at delivery were measured by Cavalleri and co-workers (1978).  No
 significant differences were found in maternal and fetal values.  The mean
 lead  erythrocyte  concentrations were 26.4 and 25.4 yg/100 ml in mothers
 and  newborns, respectively.  Plasma values were 0.66 and 0.62 yg/100 ml,
 respectively.  Similar PbB values were  noted in 500 Belgian mothers and
 their newborn infants (Roels .ejt .al. 1978).

     Robinson and co-workers (1958) reported PbB values of 7-28 yg/100 ml
in 9 neonates, 5-31 (median 15) yg/100 ml in 28 infants up to 6 months of
age, and 3-54 (median 27) yg/100 ml in 75 children from 6 months to 13
years in age.  In adults, normal PbB values range from 5-40 yg/100 ml
 (Goldwater and Hoover 1967)  with no significant difference in PbB values
of smokers (19.9 yg/100  ml)  and nonsmokers (19.0 yg/100 ml)  (McLaughlin
and Stopps 1973).
                                   5-3

-------
     Of 176 children between the ages of one to 9 years living within  20
miles or a lead smelter in Idaho, Walter et al. (1980) discovered  that
174 had PbB levels exceeding 40 ug/100 ml; 105 of these children had
PbB values >60 yg/100 ail.  In contrast, Baker et al.  (1977) reported
PbB levels within normal limits in children living within 3 kilometers
of a lead smelter.


      Lead also concentrates in the teeth, particularly in secondary
 dentine;  however, it appears to be firmly bound and unavailable for
 release.   At present,  there is no general consensus on what constitutes
 a normal or acceptable level of lead in teeth (Barry 1978).


 5.1.2.3  Elimination

      About 90% of ingested lead is eliminated, unabsorbed, via the feces
 (Kehoe 1961).  Absorbed lead is principally excreted via the urine (7670
 with lesser amounts in gastrointestinal secretions (16%) and miscellaneous
 routes of excretion, such as breast milk, sweat,  exfoliated skin, hair,
 and nails (8%) (Rabinowitz ej: al. 1973).   Normal levels of lead in urine
 are in the 30-40 yg/100 ml range (McLaughlin and Stoops 1973, Rabinowitz
 _et al.  1973).  Human breast milk contains < 5-12 jg/i (Hammond 1977).

 5.1.2.4  Metabolism of Organolead Compounds

      Organolead compounds, i.e.,  tetraethyllead and tetramethyllead,  are
 readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract,  lungs, and skin (Cohen
 1979).   They are dealkylated to trialkyl  lead compounds by mixed function
 oxidases in the liver (Bolanowska 1968, Grandjean and Nielsen 1979).   The
 trialkyl form accumulates in nonosseous tissues,  particularly the liver,
 kidney, and brain.   In rats, the half-life in liver and kidney is
 approximately 40 days  for trimethyllead and 15 days for triethyllead
 (Hayakawa 1972).   Tetramethyllead is also absorbed through skin and
 dealkylated to the trialkyl form more slowly than tetraethyllead
 (Grandjean and Nielsen 1979, Cremer 1965).

      In a study of twenty-two individuals living  in the vicinity of
 Copenhagen,  Nielsen et al.  (1979) reported a median concentration of
 0.014 yg trialkyllead/g brain tissue in these individuals who had no
 occupational exposure to organic lead.  This quantity accounted for
 approximately 20% of the total lead content of the brain.

 5.1.3  Human and Animal Studies

      In many respects, the toxic effects  associated with lead exposure
 are similar in both experimental animals  and humans.   Therefore,  where
 considerable human data are available,  the primary focus was placed on
 humans and more specifically on data that are most useful in the assess-
 ment of acceptable limits of human exposure to lead.   In areas of scant
 or nonexistent human data,  supplemental animal data are presented in
 detail.
                                   5-4

-------
 I
 I
 1
 I
 a
 I
 i
 i
 5.1.3.1  Carcinogenesis

      Animal Data

      Oral or parenteral administration of rather high doses  of  some  lead
 salts have produced benign and malignant renal  tumors in rodents.  How-
 ever, lead toxicosis and high mortality were also associated with  these
 studies.  Zollinger (1953) was the first to observe renal tumors following
 long-term subcutaneous injection of rats with lead phosphate; 19 of  29
 rats (65.5%) that survived treatment for longer than 10 months  developed
 renal tumors.   Total doses ranged between 120 and 680 milligrams of  lead.

      More recently, lead-induced renal tumors have been confirmed  in
 both rats and mice fed diets containing 0.1 and 1% basic lead acetate
 (Van Esch and Kroes 1969, Oyasu _et al.  1970, Van Esch .et al. 1962, Mao
 and Molnar 1967) and in rats fed 1% lead acetate (Boyland et al. 1962
 Goyer and Rhyne 1973).                                     	'

      In addition to renal neoplasms, Zawirska and Medras (1968) observed
 tumors of the testes,  adrenals, thyroid, pituitary and prostrate glands
 in rats fed diets containing lead acetate (3 mg/rat/day for  2 months; 4
 Img/rat/day for 16 months.  Oyasu _e_t _al. (1970)  reported gliomas (11.8%
 versus 0.3% in controls)  as well as renal tumors (76%)  in male  Sprague-
 Dawley rats fed 1% basic lead acetate in the diet for approximately  one year,
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
      Renal changes  but no neoplasms were found in male hamsters fed
 0.1 or 0.5% basic  lead acetate for two years  (Van Esch and Kroes 1969)
 and in male rats fed  diets containing 0.1% lead arsenate or 0.1% lead
 carbonate  for two years (Fairhall and Miller  1941).

      Co-carcinogenic  activity  of  lead salts has been demonstrated in rats
 and hamsters.   Hinton and co-workers (1979) observed a co-carcinogenic
 interaction between lead  and FBPA (N-[4'-fluoro-4-biphenyl]  acetamide)
 resulting  in the development of renal adenocarcinoma in rats.   This was
 demonstrated by decreasing the latency  period,  increasing the  tumor
 yield,  and increasing the percentage of tumor-bearing rats.  However,
 similar results were  not  observed  in the  liver, in fact the addition'of
 1%  lead (as  lead acetate)  to the FBPA-diet provided  early protection
 from the onset  as well  as  retardation of  later  development of  hepato-
 cellular carcinoma.

      In another study,  intratracheal  administration  of  1  mg lead  oxide
with  1 mg  benzo(a)pyrene per week  for 10 weeks  resulted in lung adenomas
 in 11 of 26  (42%) Syrian hamsters within 60 weeks.   One adenocarcinoma
of the  lung was also  observed.   These tumors were not noted in hamsters
given the  same dose of either lead oxide or benzo(a)pyrene alone
 (Kobayashi and Okamota 1974).

     A single carcinogenicity study with organic lead noted that sub-
cutaneous  injection of 0.6 milligrams of tetraethyllead given as 4
equally divided doses  to Swiss  mice between birth and 21 days of age
                                  5-5

-------
resulted in malignant lymphomas in 1 of  26 males and  5  of  41  females
between 36 and 51 weeks.  The incidence  of this lesion  in  controls  was
1 of 39 in males and 0 of 48 in females  (Epstein and  Mantel 1968).  The
significance of this finding, however, is difficult to  assess because
lymphomas occur spontaneously in this strain of mice.

     Observations in Humans

     Although human data are scant, no evidence suggests that lead  is
carcinogenic to humans (IARC 1972).  In  a study of 425  former employees
of an accumulator factory, Dingwall-Fordyce and Lane  (1963) found no
evidence of an elevated incidence of malignant neoplasms.  A  significant
excess number of deaths was noted in 170 workers with high lead  exposures
(100-250 yg/lead/100 ml urine) over the  past 20 years;  however,  mortality
predominantly resulted from vascular lesions of the central nervous
system rather than neoplasia.

     In another study, no suggestion of a relationship  between lead
exposure and death from cancer was found in 442 orchardists who  at  one
time sprayed fruit trees with lead arsenate (Nelson ^t  al^. 1973).

     In more recent studies (Cooper and Gaffey 1975,  Cooper 1978),  no
consistent association between the incidence of cancer  deaths  and either
length of employment or estimated lead exposure could be found in a
cohort of 7032 heavily-exposed workers employed for more than  one year
from 1946-70 as smelter or lead battery workers (67% PbB 2. 40  yg/100 ml,
20% 2. 70 ug/100 ml).  Further study of an additional  491 deaths  in  the
same population during the period 1970-75 also resulted in no  correlation
between lead exposure and incidence of cancer (Cooper 1980).

     With respect to organolead, a single report by Robinson  (1974) noted
no increased cancer rate in a 20-year follow-up of 592  workers exposed
to tetraethyllead.   A 20-year latency  period,  however,  is insufficient
to exclude carcinogenicity and may well  underestimate the  true incidence
of cancer..

     Thus, experiments with small rodents indicate that the addition of
0.1 or 1% basic lead acetate to the diet of rats and mice or  1%  lead
acetate to the diet of rats is carcinogenic,  resulting  in an elevated
incidence of renal tumors.  An increased frequency of adrenal, thyroid,
brain,  pituitary,  and prostate tumors has also been associated with
exposure of rats to lead acetate;  however, these data require  confirma-
tion.  Lead salts have also been shown to exhibit co-carcinogenic
activity in rats and hamsters.  No indication of tumors was reported
following exposure to lead carbonate or lead arsenate; however,  this
evidence cannot be held as conclusive.   Although human data are  scant,
no evidence suggests that lead is  carcinogenic in humans.  The equivalent
human dose to dietary levels producing renal tumors in  laboratory animals
is 550 mg/day elemental lead (IARC 1972), which is far in excess of the
maximum tolerated dose of lead for humans.
                                 5-6

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
1
 I
 I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
  5.1.3.2  Mutagenesis

      The evidence on a possible  association  of  lead  exposure  and chromo-
  somal aberrations in humans  is inconclusive  and contradictory.   Chromo-
  somal aberrations have been  reported  in  some workers in  lead  industries
  (Deknudt et al. 1973, Bauchinger _et al.  1976).   These studies,  however,
  involved mixed exposures  (Pb, Zn, Cd), which may be  a contributing
  factor to the positive findings.  However, an increased  frequency of
  aberrations has been reported in in vitro studies with human  lymphocytes
  exposed to lead acetate (10~*-lCrb M)  in  culture  (Schwanitz et al. 1970
  Beek and Obe 1974, Obe _et _al. 1975).

      Numerous other observations have essentially been negative.
 O'Riordan and Evans (1974) found no significant  increase in chromosomal
 aberrations in shipbreakers exposed to lead  oxide fumes; the  study
 population had PbB values ranging from 40 pg to  >120  ug/100 ml.
 Bauchinger and co-workers (1972) found no abnormalities in the chromo-
 somes of policemen with PbB levels elevated  20-30% above control values.
 Deknudt et al.  (1977)  noted a random increase in the  incidence of rings
 and dicentric chromosomal aberrations  in lymphocytes of some smelting
 plant workers;  however,  no correlation could be established between the
 number of aberrations  and PbB,  age,  or length of exposure.   PbB values
 ranged from 44  ug to 95  yg/100  ml.   Negative results were also noted in
 human lymphocytes exposed in culture to 10-6-10-2 M lead acetate (Schmid
 .et al.  1972).

      Thus,  whether  exposure to  lead  can induce  chromosomal  abnormalities
 in humans  remains  an unanswered  question  because of  the lack  of  sufficient
 data on  the  issue.

     Data from animal studies are also  conflicting.  Muro and Goyer
 (1969) noted that chromosomes from bone marrow cells of mice fed 1% lead
acetate in the diet for two weeks showed an increased number of chromatid
aberrations (gaps and fragments).   These aberrations involved single
chromatids, which suggest that injury followed DNA replication and thus
could have been produced in culture.  However, mice exposed to 1800 mg
lead acetate/liter in drinking water for one year exhibited no increased
chromosomal aberrations in either spermatocytes  or marrow cells (Leonard
et al. 1973)  and no increase in  aberrations was  noted in Chinese hamster
cells exposed in vitro  to various  concentrations of lead acetate
(Bauchinger and  Schmid  1972).

     DiPaolo and co-workers (1978) noted  that relatively high concentra-
tions of lead acetate enhanced transformation of Syrian hamster cells by
a simian adeno-virus (SA7) in vitro.   Enhancement ratios of 3.1,  1.9,
1.4, 1.55,  and 1.0 were recorded for hamster embryo cells exposed for
18 hours  in culture to  200, 100,  50,  25, or 0 yg/ml lead acetate,
respectively.   Subcutaneous injection of transformed cells into either
Syrian hamsters  or nude mice produced fibrosarcomas.
                                  5-7

-------
      With respect to organic lead,  negative findings were reported in a
 dominant lethal study with tetraethyllead in mice (Kennedy et al. 1975).
 while exposure of Drosophila melangoster to this compound resulted in an
 increased occurrence of nondisjunction and chromatid breaks (Ahlbers
 et al.  1972,  Ramel 1973).

      In summary,  the available experimental data do not provide unequivo-
 cal proof of  the  mutagenic activity of lead.   Results are often conflicting
 and do not allow  a satisfactory evaluation of the genetic risks of lead.
 5.1.3.3  Adverse Reproductive  Effects

     Animal Data

     Several animal studies indicate that  sublethal  lead  exposures  may
 impair normal reproductive ability.  Impotence and prostate  hyperplasia
 were observed in sexually mature male rats  exposed to  lead acetate  for
 30 days; blood lead levels were 14-26 yg/100 ml.  Testicular damage with
 inhibition of spermatogenesis  occurred in  rats with  PbB of 50-100 yg/100
 ml.  Similarly exposed female  rats exhibited irregularities  of  the  estrus
 cycle at PbB 14-30 yg/100 ml.  Ovarian follicular cysts developed in
 females when PbB reached 50 yg/100 ml (Hilderbrand et  al. 1973).  A sub-
 sequent study (Der et_ al. 1974), however, was unable to replicate these
 findings in Sprague-Dawley rats.

     In another study, Krasovskii and co-workers (1979) noted decreased
 sperm mobility and increased acid phosphatase activity in the gonadal
 tissue of rats fed 50 yg lead/kg (as lead acetate) daily for  20-30  days.
 Small disruptions in the permeability of vessels and dystrophic changes
 in the Leydig cells were also  reported.   No effects  were seen in another
 group of rats identically treated with 1.5 yg lead/kg/day.

     Similarly,  Balb/c  male mice fed 0.1% lead acetate in the diet  for
 16 months exhibited no impairment of fertility, which was judged by
 their ability to impregnate untreated females.   The  incidence of abnormal
 sperm in these treated mice was comparable with control values.  A second
 group of mice fed 1% lead acetate in the diet exhibited, within 8 weeks,
 a doubling in the mean number of abnormal sperm compared with controls.
 However,  no consistently significant reduction in sperm count or sperm
motility was seen.   Unfortunately,  males at this treatment level were
not mated with virgin females to establish the effect on fertility
 (Eyden .et al.  1978).

     Sexual maturation also appears to be disrupted by lead exposure.
Kimmel .e_t .al.  (1976)  reported a dose-related delay in puberty (vaginal
opening)  in female rats exposed from conception to 25,  50, or 250 mg/1
 lead acetate in  drinking water, which,  at least for the lowest dosage
group,  was not secondary to reduced body weight.   In a later study
utilizing the same treatment regimen,  Kimmel et al.   (1980) indicated
                                   5-8

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
i
 that delayed puberty did not affect the ability  to conceive,  to  carry  a
 normal litter to term, or to deliver the young.  No significant  increases
 in resorptions, malformations, or postnatal deaths were produced.  Gray
 and Reiter (1977) noted a similar delay in female mice administered  5  mg
 lead/ml in drinking water at parturition; no delay in vaginal opening  was
 noted in pair-fed control mice.

      In pregnant animals, large amounts of lead can prevent implantation
 and cause embryonic death.   In addition, a few studies have demonstrated
 a^teratogenic effect following an acute dose of lead, although malforma-
 tions have not been observed in most experimental investigations.

      Gale (1978) observed a variable embryotoxic response to lead in
 different strains of hamsters.   Lead nitrate (50 mg/kg) was injected
 intravenously to five inbred strains (MHA,  LSH, LHC,  CB,  and PDA) and
 one outbred strain (LVG)  of pregnant hamsters early on the eighth day
 of gestation.   The MHA and  CB strains  were  relatively resistant to lead
 exposure;  however,  the other strains exhibited increased  resorptions
 (80-92%),  tail bud abnormalities,  hydrocephalus,  and  skeletal defects.

      In rats,  intravenous injection  of  aqueous solutions  of 0, 5, or
 25 mg 210pb(N03)2/kg on day 9 of  gestation  produced no effects at the
 low dose,  but  resulted in 43.5% resorption  and 17.7%  incidence of
 stunting  and  external malformations  in  fetuses in the  25  mg/kg group
 examined  on day  20.   Dams similarly  injected  on day 15 of  gesfcation
 exhibited  no overt  toxicity at  the low  dose,  but  100%  resorption
 occurred  at the  25-mg/kg  level.   Injection  of  25  mg/kg on  day  15  was
 associated with  petechial hemorrhages in fetal brain within 90 minutes
 of dosing  with more  massive  hemorrhaging consistently  noted 24 hours
 post-dosing (Hackett _e_t al.  1978).

      Gerber and  co-workers  (1978) noted  pregnant  C57B1 mice fed diets
 containing  0.5 or 0.25% lead (as lead acetate)  exhibited decreased
 pregnancy  incidence,  increased  embryonic death, and retarded growth in
 surviving  embryos.  Maisin et al.  (1975) noted  similar findings in mice
 fed 0.1 or  0.5%  lead in the  diet during  gestation.  In contrast,  Kennedy
 et al.  (1975) reported  no effects on the number of fetuses  resorbed,  the
 number of viable fetuses, or the incidence of  terata in either mice or
 rats.  In this study, 7.14,   71.4, or 714 mg/lead/kg was administered to
 mice and rats on days 5-15 and days 6-16 of gestation, respectively.

     Urorectocaudal malformations were produced in the surviving offspring
 of rats injected intravenously with 50 mg lead nitrate/kg on day 9 of
 gestation.  Malformations noted include absence of tail (21%), absence  of
 genitalia (23%), imperforate anus (12%), and sirenomelia (16%).  None of
 these abnormalities was present in untreated controls.   These malforma-
 tions were not observed in rats injected with the same dose on day 16 of
gestation; however 40% of  survivors were hydrocephalic (McClain and
Becker 1975).   Tail abnormalities, ranging from stunting to the' complete
absence of the tail,  have  been reported in hamsters following injection
of dams with various lead  salts (Ferm and Carpenter 1967).   In addition,
                                  5-9

-------
 treatment of chick embryos with lead salts has been shown to produce
 hydrocephalus and meningoceles (Butt &t al. 1952, Mclaughlin et al.
 1963), as well as cardiac abnormalities (Gilani 1973).

  _    With respect to organic lead, the inability of the fetus to metabo-
 lize tetraelkyllead compounds to their trialkylform appears to protect
 the fetus.  No terata have been observed in either rats (Odenbro and
 Kihlstrom 1977, Kennedy et al.  1975) or mice (Kennedy et al. 1975)
 exposed in utero to tetralead compounds.  Increased resorption of fetuses
 growth retardation, and incomplete bone ossification were noted in rats
 exposed to either tetraethyl- or tetramethyl-lead; however,  these inci-
 dences occurred only as a result of doses  that produced distinct maternal
 toxicity (McClain and Becker 1975).

      Observations in Humans

      Lead exerts a profound,  adverse effect on the fetus and interferes
 with the reproductive ability of  both men  and  women at PbB  levels  of
 30-40 ug/100 ml (NRC 1980).   Several stages of the reproductive process
 are vulnerable  to lead.   They are the sperm and/or egg prior to concep-
 tion,  the embryo during pregnancy,  and  the neonate.

      Historically,  lead exposure  has  been  linked  to  disturbances of
 menstruation and elevated incidences  of miscarriages and stillbirths in
 women working in lead industries.   This was particularly the case  during
 the latter half  of  the 19th  century.  Recently, Panova (1972) reported
 that women working  in a printing  plant  for 1-12 months at ambient  air
 levels  of < 7 yg  Pb/m3 had a higher  incidence of ovulatory dysfunction
 (mainly anovulatory  cycles) compared  with  a control  group.   In  a critical
 review  of this  study,  however, Zielhuis  and Wibowo  (1977) noted the
 difficulty in evaluating Panova's conclusions because  of the design  of
 and the presentation  of  data.  More importantly, no  consideration appears
 to  have been given to  the dust levels of lead, which is  an important
 consideration in  print  shops.

     Lead  absorbed into  the bloodstream of  pregnant women crosses the
 placenta  and  enters the  blood of the  fetus.  Umbilical cord  blood lead
 levels  are similar to  those found in mother's blood  (Cavalleri et al.
 1978).  Because the fetus  develops rapidly, it is particularly vulnerable
 to  intrauterine exposure  to lead.  Furthermore, calcium and  iron defici-
 encies, which are commonly observed in pregnant women, cause the mother
 to  have a higher  risk of  lead toxicosis.

     Both Lane (1949) and Nogaki (1958)  suggest that miscarriages can
occur in women with only modest exposure to lead;  and Wibberley _et al.
 (1977)  recently noted a striking increase in the level of placentaYTead
associated with stillbirths.  Fahim et al.   (1976)  reported elevated
incidences of pre-term deliveries (13 versus 3 in controls)  and early
fetal membrane rupture (17 versus 0.41 in controls) in women living in
a lead mining area of Missouri compared  with women living in an urban
environment in Missouri.  One confusing  aspect of  this study, however, is
the  unexplained similarity in PbB levels in all mothers,


                                  5-10

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 I
I
I
I
I
      There are also reports on the effects of lead on the male reproduc-
 tive function.  Lancranjan _et al. (1975) reported evidence of decreased
 fertility in occupationally-exposed men.  These disturbances included
 alterations in spermatogenesis (increased frequency of asthenospermia,
 hypospermia and teratospermia) in men with PbB of 50-80 yg/100 ml.  No
 effects were noted in the 23-41 yg/100 ml PbB range.  Reduced sexual
 potency, testicular pain, and a reduced number of spermatozoa have been
 reported in workers exposed to tetraethyllead (Vurdelja et al. 1967
 Neshkov 1971).

      No data suggest that lead is teratogenic in humans.   One report
 (Palmisano ej: al.  1969) suggested a possible link between maternal
 consumption of lead-contaminated whiskey with neuromuscular abnormali-
 ties and failure to thrive in a ten-week-old infant whose mother
 had lead poisoning concomitant with alcoholism.

      Thus,  several studies indicate that exposure to high levels of lead
 may impair normal  reproductive ability in experimental animals (e.g.,
 testicular damage, irregularities of the estrus  cycle,  disruption of
 sexual maturation).   In pregnant  animals,  lead is embryotoxic;  and, at
 least in some species,  lead induces  terata of the urorectocaudal region
 subsequent  to acute  lead exposure.   A number of  investigators,  however,
 have observed no increase in the  incidence of terata in experimental
 animals exposed to lead during gestation.

      Lead also exerts significant adverse  effects on the  reproductive
 function in humans;  however, most available  data are related  to  high
 occupational exposure and therefore  are  difficult to extrapolate  to
 normal exposure levels.   No evidence  suggests that  lead is  teratogenic
 in  humans.

 5.1.3.4  Other Toxic Effects

      No beneficial effects  of  lead have  been  found.   Because  of  its
 accumulation in bone tissue, even a low  daily intake  of lead  can  even-
 tually  produce  toxic effects.  Although  other systems may be  adversely
 affected, in humans, as  in  experimental  animals,  the  three principal
 target  organs  for  lead are  the erythroid cells of the bone marrow,  the
 kidney,  and  the  central  and peripheral nervous systems.  The  inhibitory
 effects  of lead  on erythropoiesis are reversible; however, severe acute
 or  chronic lead poisoning may be  followed by  irreversible injury  to  the
 kidney  and nervous system.

     Hematopoietic System

     Exposure to lead results in derangement of the hematopoietic system
with disruption of hemoglobin synthesis  considered the critical or first
 adverse effect of lead exposure.  Lead interferes with hemoglobin syn-
 thesis at a number of steps:   (1) it causes partial inhibition of several
 enzymatic steps in the biosynthesis of heme;  (2)  it impairs the uptake
and use of iron; and (3) it impairs globin synthesis in the developing
erythroid cells of the bone marrow.


                                5-11

-------
      Heme  is  formed  in  the mitochondria and  is  an essential component
 of  the  cytochrome  system  and  cell  respiration.   Heme also serves as the
 prosthetic group of  hemoglobin,  the  protein  that transports oxygen from
 the respiratory system  to the cells  of  the body.   The biosynthesis of
 heme is a multi-step process.  At  least two  of  these steps are considered
 directly inhibited by lead.   These are:   (1)  the transformation of
 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) into porphobilinogen,  catalyzed by <5-amino-
 levulinate dehydratase  (ALAD); and (2)  the insertion of  iron in proto-
 porphyrin IX  to form heme, catalyzed by ferrochelatase (heme synthetase)
 (Hammond 1977, Chisolm  1978).  Lead  also affects  other steps in the
 process of heme synthesis, such as 6-ALA synthetase  and  coprogenase.
 However, these effects  may be secondary results  of feedback derepression
 rather  than a direct effect of lead  (Hammond  1977).

     Although specific  inhibition  of ferrochelatase  by lead is generally
 accepted as the cause of  the  accumulation of  protoporphyrin in the
 erythrocytes, lead probably also inhibits the availability of  iron for
 coupling with protoporphyrin  (WHO  1977).  Globin  synthesis in  the  red
 blood cells is also  apparently impaired;  however,  the  mechanisms  that
 cause reduced globin synthesis are unknown (WHO 1977).

     In general, clinical anemia does not occur until  PbB  levels are
 >80 yg/100 ml (Muir  and Bridbord 1977).   The  available data (Tola  et _al.
 1973) suggest, however,  that mild  anemia  with a small  reduction  in blood
 hemoglobin may occur in adults at  or slightly above  the dose levels
 associated with a minimal increase in urinary excretion of ALA (PbB
 50 ug/100 ml.  Children appear to  be more sensitive  to lead anemia than
 adults; reduction in hemoglobin may occur at  PbB of  -40 yg/100 ml  (WHO
 1977).  An increased rate of erythrocyte  breakdown (decreased  erythrocyte
 life) is often,  but not  consistently, seen in cases  of anemia  as a result
 of lead poisoning  (WHO 1977).

     Indicators  of the critical effect of lead on hemoglobin synthesis
 include rapid depression of ALAD activity, an associated increase  in
 urinary ALA,  and a delayed rise in free erythrocyte protoporphyrin (FEP)
 in blood (Chisolm 1978).

     Because'lead acts directly on the circulating erythrocytes, the
 rapid depression of ALAD activity most closely correlates with the
 concentration of lead in the blood.  There is an inverse linear rela-
 tionship between the logarithm of ALAD activity in erythrocytes and the
 concentration of lead in whole blood  over a PbB range of 5-95 yg/100 ml.
The average no-effects PbB threshold  for inhibition of erythrocyte ALAD
activity is about 10-20  yg/100 ml  (Tola et al. 1973).  Nordman and
Hernberg (1975),  however,  have reported an inhibition of ALAD at PbB
of 8.4 yg/100 ml,  which  raises questions concerning the existence  of
a no-effect level.   The  toxicological implications of ALAD  inhibition
are not adequately known.

     Significant inhibition of ALAD is associated with the accumulation
and excretion of excess  ALA in urine  and a rise in blood FEP.  The
                                  5-12

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 relationship between ALA in urine and PbB is not linear; the increase
 of ALA in urine becomes marked when PbB is >40-60 yg (Tsuchiya 1979).
 The rise  in FEP and  the depression of ALAD activity are almost equally
 as sensitive as indices of  lead exposure.   FEP elevation is delayed
 by approximately two weeks  because it reflects inhibitory effects
 occurring in erythroid  cells  in the bone marrow (Hammond 1977).   Women
 and children appear  to  have an earlier and more rapid increase in FEP
 than men  for the same levels  of PbB.   Blood lead threshold for the FEP
 response  is -15-20 ug/100 ml  for adult females and  children and  -25-30
 yg/100 ml for adult  males  (Zielhuis 1975).   The reasons for these
 differences are not  entirely  clear; however, they may be related to
 differences in iron  stores, hormonal  factors,  and growth rate (Roels
.et al.  1978).

     Renal System

     The  nephropathic effects of lead intoxication  are  profound.   Two
 stages of lead-induced  nephropathy are:   (1) proximal tubular morpho-
 logic  changes accompanied by  a reversible tubular dysfunction, which is
 seen mainly with short-term exposure; and (2)  interstitial fibrosis,
 which  is  generally considered to be of a slow, progressive nature and
 which  eventually causes contracted kidneys  and chronic  renal failure
 (Goyer 1979,  Payne and  Saunders 1978).

     Acute lead nephropathy in children  is  characterized by dysfunction
 of the proximal renal tubules (Fanconi's syndrome)  manifested as  glyco-
 suria,  hypophosphatemia with  phosphaturia  and  generalized aminoaciduria
 (Granick _et al.  1978).   Pueschel et al.  (1972)  reported generalized
 aminoaciduria in 8 of 43 children with PbBs  of 40-120 ug/100 ml and
 slight lead-related  neurological signs.   Similar  symptoms have been
 observed  in occupationally-exposed  adults  (Clarkson and Kench 1956,
 Goyer  ejt  al.  1972);  however,  PbB levels  were not  reported.   In adults,
 amonoaciduria is  probably uncommon  at PbB levels <70 ug/100 ml (U.S.  EPA
 1980).   Changes  in the  proximal tubules  include  the formulation of
 intranuclear  inclusion  bodies  of  lead-protein  complexes and alterations
 in mitochondrial  structure and  function  (Goyer and  Mushak 1977).  Treat-
ment with  chelating  agents will reverse  a minoaciduria  along  with the
 functional  and morphological  changes  associated with lead  toxicity
 (Goyer  and Mushak 1977).

     It is uncertain  if  acute lead  nephropathy, treated  or  untreated,
influences  the development of any form of chronic nephropathy without
continuous lead exposure.  An Australian study indicated  that long-term
exposure to lead early  in life  could  result  in chronic  nephropathy  in
adulthood  (Emmerson 1968).   On  the  other hand, Tepper (1963) was unable
to find evidence of chronic nephropathy in young American adults 10-20
years after childhood lead poisoning.  A recent study in  rats (Fine et_ al.
1979) also reported no  indications of progressive, interstitial nephro-
pathy or alterations  in  renal growth or development, despite an acute
increase in the body  burden of lead in growing rats.
                                  5-13

-------
      Long-term exposure to lead may result in the development of irrever-
 sible functional and morphological renal changes.  The second stage of
 lead  nephropathy has the morphologic appearance of an interstitial
 nephritis.   Interstitial fibrosis  becomes progressively severe with
 tubular atrophy and eventually reduced  glomerular filtration progressing
 into  renal  failure  (Goyer 1979).

      Reduced glomerular filtration occurs at  relatively low levels of
 lead  exposure (Weeden e_t al_.  1975,  Cramer et.  al.  1974,  Lilis et al.
 1979).   Weeden and  co-workers (1975)  reported reduced glomerular filtra-
 tion  rates  in four  of eight men occupationally exposed to lead (PbB
 48-98 yg/100 ml).   Lilis et al.  (1979)  noted  a sizable reduction in the
 glomerular  filtration rate (age-adjusted)  of  255  secondary lead smelting
 workers.  A significant increase in blood-urea-nitrogen and serum
 creatinine  levels,  which correlated with the  duration of lead exposure,
 were  also documented.   A total of  18, 37,  37,  and 77,  of the test popula-
 tion  had PbB levels in the >80,  60-79,  40-59  and  <40  yg/100 ml,
 respectively.

      Thus,  proximal tubular dysfunction can occur in  both children and
 adults  and  are generally noted after short-term exposure.   Kidney disease
 associated  with  chronic lead  exposure has  not  been adequately studied and
 is difficult  to  detect,  i.e.,  blood  urea nitrogen and serum creatinine
 become  elevated  only  when two-thirds  of the kidney function is  lost.
 Little  is known  about  dose-response  relationships;  however PbB >70 pg/100
 ml for  a prolonged  period are  believed  to  give rise to  chronic  irrever-
 sible nephropathy (Goyer 1979).

     Central  and Peripheral Nervous  Systems

     Among  the most devastating effects  of increased  lead  absorption are
 the effects on the  central  and peripheral nervous  systems.   Toxic  levels
 of lead  in  the central  nervous system (CNS) can interfere  with neuro-
 transmitters  or  the levels  of essential metals as well  as  inhibit  various
 enzyme  systems, some of which are responsible  for  the energy metabolism
 of the  brain  (Granick e_t  al. 1978).  Manifested as  encephalopathy,
 effects  on  the CNS are  seen more frequently in children  than adults.
 This may be attributed  to several factors; e.g.,  children  absorb more
 lead from the diet  than adults; the brain is especially vulnerable to
 insult  during  the period  of rapid neurodevelopment; and behavioral
 patterns, such as pica, may predispose children to higher  lead exposure.
 In addition to age,  the severity of encephalopathy also depends on the
 intensity and duration of exposure.  Major features of encephalopathy
 are:  dullness, hyperkinetic or aggressive behavior, headaches, muscular
 tremors, hallucinations, and,  in severe cases, convulsions, mania,
 paralysis,  and coma (WHO 1977).  The minimal level of lead exposure
associated with lead encephalopathy in children is not clearly known;
however, it is estimated  to be 80 ug/100 ml PbB (WHO 1977).

     Arnvig and co-workers  (1980) reported that nine men with occupa-
 tional exposure to lead in a battery plant exhibited PbB levels of
                                  5-14

-------
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 58-82 yg/100 ml.  The authors conducted numerous psychological tests on
 these men and observed severe deficiencies in memory tests, concentration
 and attention, and psychomotor performance.  Although they did not evalu-
 ate a control group, the authors feel that serious abnormalities were
 identified.

      Recently, however, several studies have raised questions about the
 subtle impairment of the cerebral function in children at sub-encephalo-
 pathic blood lead levels (40-80 yg/100 ml) (Landrigan et_ al.. 1975,
 De la Burde and Choate 1972, 1975,  Perino and Ernhart 1974).  These
 studies,  however, have been subject to criticism because of flaws in
 the experimental design, such as overlapping of lead exposures between
 test and  control populations, insensitivity of behavioral tests,  compli-
 cations of nutritional and socioeconomic status, etc.  General findings
 of a few  key studies are discussed  below;  however,  the interested reader
 is urged  to review the detailed analyses of the neurological and  behav-
 ioral effects of lead by Repko and  Corum (1979), Needleman (1980),
 and the U.S.  EPA (1977).

      De la Burde and Choate (1972,  1975)  compared children with a history
 of pica and elevated PbB (>40 yg/100 ml) with control children with no
 history of pica.   The lead-exposed  children showed  mental impairment,
 irritability,  and poor fine motor coordination.   Although the  groups were
 matched for race,  age,  sex, and socioeconomic variables,  no lead  assess-
 ments were made  for  the control group.

      A controversial study  by Landrigan  e_t  al.  (1975)  reported neuro-
 logical dysfunction  in  46  symptom-free children  (3-15  years) with
 moderately elevated  blood  lead concentrations (mean 48  ug/100  ml)  when
 compared with  children  with PbB  <40  yg  (mean  27  yg/100 ml).  The  lead-
 exposed group  showed lower  scores (Wechsler Intelligence  Scale) and
 poorer  results in  the  finger-wrist  tapping  test  than  controls.  However,
 no  differences were  exhibited between the groups  in full-scale  I.Q.,
 verbal  I.Q., or hyperactivity behavior ratings.   No conclusive  evidence
 of  lead as  a causative  factor was presented. . Perino and Ernhart  (1974)
 also  concluded that  neurobehavioral  deficits  occurred at PbB levels as
 low as  40  yg/100 ml.

      Diminished learning ability  (I.Q. drop of 4-7  points) and behavioral
 changes, such as diminished attention span in children, have also been
 associated with increased concentrations of lead  in teeth  (Needleman
 et  al. 1974).

      Conversely, several studies have reported negative results between
 lead-exposed groups and controls  (Kotok 1972, Lansdown et al. 1974,
McNeil et  al. 1975).   These studies, however, have  the same~~type of flaws
 as  the studies that suggest positive correlations between low lead levels
 and neurological deficits in children.

     Despite problems inherent in these studies, sufficient evidence
indicates  that subtle neurobehavioral effects do occur in children
                                  5-15

-------
 exposed  to  sub-encephalopathic  levels  of lead.   The minimal level of
 lead  exposure,  duration  of  exposure, and the age of susceptibility,
 however,  cannot be  clearly  defined  with any  degree  of certainty.   The
 World Health  Organization  (1977)  concluded that  the probability of
 noticeable  brain dysfunction  increases in children  from PbB levels
 ~50 ug/100  ml.

      Subtle behavioral changes  have also been documented in experimental
 animals  (Shih and Hanin  1978, Laporte  and Talbott 1978,  Dietz  ejt  al.
 1978,  Bushnell  and  Bowman 1979).  Effects noted  include changes in time
 perception  (Dietz et. al. 1978), learning ability (Laporte  and  Talbott
 1978,  Bushnell  and  Bowman 1979),  motor activity  (Reiter et_ al.  1975),
 and avoidance behavior as adults  (Krigman 1978).  Lin-Fu~Tl9"76)
 cited several animal studies  that suggest hyperactivity might  result
 from  moderate lead  exposure via mother's milk.

      Hernberg ej:  al. (1967) and Landrigan and Baker (1976)  have also
 documented  the  effects of lead exposure  in the peripheral  nervous system
 of both adults  and  children.  Peripheral neuropathy affects  somatic motor
 neurons and is  characterized by the loss of  nerve fibers  (axons and
 myelin sheaths)  and, to  some degree, segmental demyelination (Krigman
 1978).  Classic  symptoms are wrist  drop  and  lead "colic,"  a  reflection
 of the effect of  lead on the autonomic  innervation  of  the  gut  (Granick
_e_t jl. 1978).  A  number  of studies has also  documented  the  occurrence of
 slowed nerve  conduction with an approximate  PbB  >50  yg/100 ml  (Landrigan
 and Baker 1976, Hernberg ejt al. 1967, Lilis  ejt _al.  1977).

 5.1.4  Overview

 5.1.4.1  Ambient  Water Quality Criteria  — Human Health

     An ambient water quality criterion  of 50 yg/1  lead has  been  estab-
 lished to protect human health (U.S. EPA 1980).  The criterion  is  based on
 on calculated level that is protective of  the effects of lead on  heme
 synthesis,  the  "critical effect"  selected  by the U.S. EPA  (1980)  for
 establishing  standards.  Because  children  are more  sensitive to the
 effects of  lead  than adults, the  U.S. EPA  has established  that  the  max-
 imum  safe blood lead level  (PbB)  for any given child should  be  lower
 than-the threshold  for a decrement  in hemoglobin  (PbB »  40  ug/100 ml).
 The Center  for Disease Control and  the American Academy  of  Pediatrics
 recommended a PbB of 30  yg/100 ml.  However,  the U.S. EPA  (1980)  has
 estimated that  if the geometric mean PbB was kept at 15  yg/100 ml,  99.5%
 of all children would have PbB <.  30 yg/100 ml.

     Non-air sources contributing to PbB levels have been estimated to
be 10-12 yg/100 ml.   It is believed that dietary intake is the main
contributor to this  PbB level (U.S.  EPA 1980).  U.S. EPA (1980) assumed
that  food and the available drinking water (  ±10 yg Pb/1) are the princi-
pal contributors  to  a PbB level of 12 yg/100 ml,  and calculated that  the
consistent consumption of drinking water at the present lead standard
 (50 yg Pb/1) would contribute an additional 3.4 yg/100 ml to PbB levels.
                                  5-16

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 This would yield a PbB of 15.4 ug/100 ml, attributable to food and
 drinking water.  A value approximately the same as the maximum geometric
 mean PbB value that would maintain 99.5% of the children in the United
 States at a PbB level <30 yg/100 ml.  However, this blood level (15.4
 Ug/100 ml) does not take into consideration contributions from air.

 5.1.4.2  Other Considerations

      Lead has no natural or beneficial function in the body and even a
 low daily intake of lead can eventually produce toxic effects.  Children
 appear to be particularly susceptible to the effects of lead, which
 probably reflects the marked difference in lead absorption between
 children and adults.   In general, young children absorb 3-10 times more
 lead than adults.  Between 5 and 10% of ingested lead and 30% of inhaled
 lead are absorbed by  an adult.   Lead salts do not readily penetrate
 intact skin.

      Absorbed lead is transported by the blood; and,  under steady-state
 conditions,  is believed to be distributed into three  compartments:
 blood,  soft  tissues,  and the calcified matrix of bone.   The  concentra-
 tion of lead  in blood (PbB)  is  of prime importance in the determination
 of  recent lead exposure.   Most  adults  in the  United States have  mean
 PbB of   10-20 ug/100  ml.   Approximately 90% of the lead body burden is
 stored  in bone.   The  effects of  lead,  however, are more closely  related
 to  the  concentration  of lead in  critical tissues,  such  as the  brain and
 the kidney.   Although other  systems  may be adversely  affected, the  most
 prominent effects  of  lead  are noted  in the erythropoietic system, the
 nervous  system,  and in the kidney.

      Lead exposure results in derangement of  the heme-hematopoietic
 system,  with  disruption of hemoglobin  synthesis being the first observed
 adverse  effect  of  lead  exposure.   In general,  clinical  anemia does not
 occur until PbB values  are >80 ug/100  ml; however, mild anemia may occur
 with  PbB  levels of ~40  ug/100 ml  in children and at or  slightly above
 50  ug/100 ml  in adults.

     The  effects of lead exposure on the central and peripheral nervous
 systems include encephalopathy, interference of neurotransmitters, and
 inhibition of various enzyme systems responsible for energy metabolism
 in  the brain.   Encephalopathy is rare  in adults but more frequent in
 children.  The lowest reported PbB effect levels are 80 ug/100 ml for
 children and 100 ug/100 ml for adults.   Recently, subtle neuro-behavioral
 impairments have been reported at PbB levels for which no overt symptoms
of lead toxicity are seen.   Although data are somewhat contradictory,
 the evidence suggests  a slight cognitive impairment and possible  behav-
ioral effects in individuals with PbB concentrations persistently greater
than 40 ug/100 ml.  Below this value, some effects are indicated; however
the evidence,  to date, is inconclusive.
                                  5-17

-------
      The nephropathic effects of lead intoxication are profound.
 Proximal tubular dysfunction can occur in both children  (PbB = 40-120
 Ug/100 ml) and adults (PbB >70 ug/100 ml) and is generally noted after
 short-term exposure.  Prolonged exposure, resulting in PbB values
 >70 ug/100 ml, may cause irreversible functional and morphological renal
 changes.

      Although human data on the carcinogenicity of lead are scant  no
 evidence  suggests that lead is carcinogenic to humans.  Many of the
 animal studies that indicate carcinogenic activity for some lead com-
 pounds are not suitable for extrapolation to humans because of the
 inappropriate routes of exposure.   Feeding experiments with rodents
 have shown that the addition of 0.1 to 1% basic lead acetate to the
 diet of rats  and mice or 1% lead acetate  to the diet of rats is carcino-
 genic,  resulting in an elevated incidence of renal tumors.   Lead salts
 have also been shown to be co-carcinogenic in rats and hamsters.   The
 equivalent human dose to dietary levels producing renal tumors  in
 laboratory animals  is 550 mg  of elemental lead/day,  which is far  in
 excess  ot the maximum tolerated dose  of lead in humans.   No carcinogenic
 activity  has  been noted  in occupationally-exposed persons with  PbB
 >40  ug/100  ml.

      High occupational exposures to lead  have resulted in profound
 adverse effects  on  fetuses  and  have interfered with  the reproductive
 ability of  both  men and  women at PbB  levels  of  30-40 ug/100  ml    No
 evidence  indicates  that  lead is  teratogenic  in humans.  In  pregnant
 animals,  lead is  embryotoxic and, at  least  in some species,  induces
 terata of the urorectocaudal region with  doses of 50 mg/kg.  Several
 investigators, however,  have observed no  increase in the  incidence of
 terata in experimental animals exposed to similar levels  of  lead during
 gestation.  Exposure  to  high lead levels,  however, does impair normal
 reproductive  ability  in  experimental animals  (e.g., testicular damage,
 irregularities of the  estrus cycle, disruption of sexual maturation).

     Evidence for a possible association of lead exposure and chromosomal
 aberrations in humans is inconclusive and contradictory.  Chromosomal
 aberrations have been reported in some workers in lead industries; these
 studies, however, involved exposures to multiple agents that may confound
 reported  findings.  Numerous other observations have been essentially
negative.   Data from animal studies are also conflicting.

     Thus, a multitude of adverse health effects are associated with lead
 intoxication.   Blood lead levels in the 30-40 ug/100 ml range are the
 lowest effect levels reported to date.  Some evidence indicates adverse
 effects below this value; however,  to date, the evidence is inconclusive.
 Therefore, the lower limits of lead exposure at which toxic effects may
 occur cannot be quantified accurately.
                                  5-18

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 I
I
I
I
I
  5.2  HUMAN  EXPOSURE


  5.2.1   Introduction


      The effects of lead on humans have been studied  for years  as  de-
  scribed in  the previous section.  In order  to deal with this  problem
  numerous regulatory mechanisms have been initiated; i.e., setting  an'
  air quality standard, a drinking water standard, and  a limit  on lead
  content in paints (NRC 1980).  m addition, lead screening programs
  have been established for children, and some states have enacted laws
  intended to deal with this hazard.


      Although "undue" exposure to adults appears limited primarily to
 occupational settings, exposure to lead is prevalent among children.
                                                                     .

              % °f 277'347 Chlldren t£Sted in the lead screening program
 showed blood lead levels (PbB) >40 ug/100 ml.   In 1974 and 1975  this
 percentage decreased to 6.4 and 6.5,  respectively.   In 1976. when the
 level defined as an elevated blood lead level was reduced to 30 t-e
 Pb/100 ml, 8.7% of the 500,463 children screened exceeded this level
 In addition, 2.7% of the children exceeded 50 yg/100 ml in the blood

  ?^er  !r Disease Contro1 1977>-   Studies of large populations of
 children have shown that PbB levels  show lognonnal  distributions with
 geometric means for city children of  20-30 pg/ml (Billick et al. undated-a
 Angle and Mclntire 1979).                                  --


      One of many problems associated  with the quantification of human
 exposure to lead is the establishment of a background exposure.  Although
 a J?bB of 2:> yg/ml is not considered  excessive  in terms of the lead
 screening program, it is probably in  excess of mean PbB levels in rural
 areas (Angle and Mclntire 1979)  and of historical levels (Settle and
 Patterson 1980).   These authors  have  suggested that typical American
 skeletal concentrations of  lead  are 500 times  higher than ancient
 Peruvian skeletons.   Thus,  "normal" levels of  lead  do not necessarily
 represent acceptable levels.


      An additional problem  in  the quantification of  human exposure  to
 lead  is  that PbB  is  commonly used as  an indication  of exposure.   Though
 this  measure can  be  used, to some extent,  in the  assessment  of  risk,
 PbB levels  indicate  relatively recent  exposure  (Needleman et  al.  1979).
 Also,  it  is  difficult  to  identify the  source of  exposure,  except  through
 regression analyses  or  similar statistical methods.    Although other
 indices have  been  used  to estimate exposure  (i.e., hair,  teeth),
 especially in a relative sense, they do not correlate as well with
 effects as PbB values.


     One of  the most difficult problems in the quantification of human
 exposure is inherent in the analytical techniques, and laboratory and
sample contamination.  This has been noted numerous  times in the litera-
ture.   Keppler (1970) reported the results of interlaboratory analyses
tor lead in blood and found that results from 60% of the laboratories
                                  5-19

-------
were unacceptable.  More  recently,  Settle  and  Patterson (1980)  have
discussed  this problem in the analysis of  albacore.   They  reported a
1000-fold  error in the lead concentration  reported by the  National
Marine Fisheries Service  (NMFS) when  it dissected, handled,  and analyzed
the specimen.  Settle and Patterson (1980) attributed a 20-fold error
to improper sample preparation and  a  50-fold error to improper  analyses.
These authors  suggest that such errors are widespread and have led to
an underestimation of exposure as a result of  anthropogenic  sources.

     This  section will attempt to identify the routes of exposure  to
lead for humans.  In addition, attempts will be made,  based  on  the
literature, to identify the major routes of exposure  in varying situa-
tions.   It is particularly difficult  to assess the routes  of exposure
for children because certain behavior patterns are not well  studied or
quantified; e.g.,the composition of the diet and behavioral  aspects
(i.e.,  pica, contact with  dust).

     The known exposure routes for  humans are  summarized in  Figure 5-1.
Note that  the routes are numerous and complex.  Although food is
generally  considered the largest source of lead in exposure  to  adults,
none of these routes can be considered minor,  because  both drinking
water and  air can result  in more significant exposures  in  some  situations.
Similarly, the consumption of paint chips is considered the  largest expo-
sure route of lead for children; however, other routes, including  contact
with dust and dirt, may be significant.  In general,  exposure through
percutaneous absorption,  as well as exposure to alkyl  lead compounds,
are thought to be important only in occupational settings  (WHO  1977).
Thus, these two exposure routes will not be discussed  here.

     The following sections will consider exposure of  humans to lead
through food, drinking water,  air,   the ingestion of nonfood  substances,
and miscellaneous sources.  Because these subjects have been reviewed
extensively (WHO 1977, Mahaffey 1978, U.S.  EPA 1977, Tsuchiya 1979,
NRC 1980), these reviews have been used here to avoid  duplication  of
effort  and have been supplemented with pertinent work  from the  recent
literature.

5.2.2  Populations Exposed Through Food

5.2.2.1  Pathways of Exposure

     Intake of lead in food is thought to be the primary pathway for
adults  not employed in lead-related industries and for children without
pica (Mahaffey 1978).   Sources of lead in food are numerous and the
pathways from the original source to the diet are sometimes complex
(see Figure 5-1).   In general,  lead can either be taken up through
surface deposition on the plant or  through the roots  (see Chapter 4.0).
Foods of animal origin (meats,  unprocessed milk,  eggs) are generally
lower in lead (Mahaffey 1978).   Sources of lead in the diet include
contamination resulting from lead-soldered cans,  past use of lead
arsenate pesticides,  deposition on  soil or plants from such sources as
                                   5-20

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Source: Moore (1979).
           FIGURE 5-1   POPULATION EXPOSURE ROUTES FOR LEAD
                                   5-21

-------
automobile and smelter emissions, contamination of moonshine whiskey,
leaching from improperly glazed earthenware, and uptake  from lead  in
cooking water (Mahaffey 1978, Moore 1979).

     Although each of these routes has been important in certain
instances, and, in some cases, fatal, the contamination  of food through
the use of lead solder in cans represents the most widespread source of
lead in the diet.  In 1975, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA)
estimated that canned foods comprise 11-12% of a person's diet after
1 year of age; however, the lead resulting from these foods comprises
30% of the average dietary intake of lead.  More recently, the FDA has
said that lead-soldered cans are used to package 10-15%  of all food,
and they contribute about 14% to the total lead ingested (Anonymous
1979a).  Settle and Patterson (1980) have estimated that canned foods
comprise about 20% of the diet, and that 50% of the lead in the American
diet originates from lead-soldered cans.  According to Settle and
Patterson (1980), the lower percentage estimated by the FDA may be a
reflection of their overestimation of uncontaminated food sources.

     Mitchell and Aldous (1974) examined the contents of 256 metal cans
and reported that 62% of them contained lead at concentrations  100 ug/1,
37% >200 ug/1, and 12% >400 ug/1.   In contrast, only 1% of products in
glass or aluminum containers had lead concentrations >200 ug/1.  The
same authors conducted a survey of milk and reported that bulk milk
contained a mean lead concentration of 40 vg/1.  Other authors found
that a normal level for milk was 2-10 ug/1 lead (Harding 1978).  However,
canned evaporated milk contained a mean lead concentration oi: 202 ug/1-
The difference can be attributed to contamination in processing and from
the lead solder.   Similar results  have been reported in baby food, with
a mean concentration of 202 ug/1 for canned-food items,  and a mean
concentration of 35 ug/1 for bottled foods (Mitchell and Aldous 1974).
Settle and Patterson (1980) found  that tuna in lead-soldered cans con-
tained 1400 ug/kg lead (wet weight); however,  tuna packed in a die-
punched unsoldered can contained 7 ug/kg lead.   These results did not
represent a survey of levels in tuna.

     It is apparent that lead-soldered cans represent an important
source of lead in the diet; however, the contribution from this source
is highly variable.   To complicate matters further,  the FDA reported
that higher concentrations  of lead were found  in foods stored in opened
cans than in unopened cans  (Anonymous 1979b).   Thus,  persons who store
foods in opened cans (lead-soldered) may be exposed  to higher levels of
lead in foods than some studies have indicated.

     Automobile exhaust,  as a source of lead deposition on plants and
soil, is important in some  areas where traffic volume is higher.   For
example,  Rabinowitz (1974)  estimated that in Southern California,  60-70%
of lead in oat tops and 80% of lead in lettuce leaves were attributed to
automobile exhaust.   The absorption of lead'in air depends highly on the
type of crop.  In addition, elevated concentrations  in plants  are observed
                                  5-22

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 within 100-200 meters of the highway  (see Chapter  4.0).   Still,  it  is
 not possible to identify what portion of the diet  contains  lead  as  a
 result of automobile emissions, even though it is  evident,  in  some
 cases, that this portion could be high.

      Food contamination resulting from other sources of lead,  such  as
 smelters, can also be important.  Elevated levels  in plants appear  to
 be spread over a wider area from these sources (see Chapter 4.0).   As
 an example of levels resulting from a smelter area, Roberts et al.
 (1974) found mean levels of 2.9 mg lead/kg (fresh weight) in~Tett"uce
 leaves from a smelter area, as compared with mean levels from  the urban
 control area of 0.9 mg/kg lead.   On the other hand, no difference was
 observed in lead levels in tomatoes from the two areas.  Leafy vegetables,
 however,  retain larger amounts from air deposition (Rabinowitz 1974).
 Again, it is difficult to identify what portion of the diet of persons
 living near smelters can be attributed to lead emissions.

      Past uses  of  lead arsenate  as a pesticide have resulted in accumula-
 tion of lead in the soil (see Chapter 4-0).   This source of lead can
 result in food  contamination in  crops cultivated  in areas  where lead
 arsenate  was used.   Elfving and  co-workers  (1978) have reported elevated
 concentrations  of  lead (over controls)  in carrots and millet grown on  old
 orchard soils  (7.1 and 6.8  mg/kg lead dry weight).   However, the soil  in
 these  cases  contained  218 mg/kg  lead.   Considerably higher concentrations
 of lead have been  reported  in other orchard  sites.

     The  number of  people exposed  to high levels  of lead as  a  result of
 beverages contaminated because of  improperly glazed earthenware and
 distilling and  uptake  from  cooking  water  is probably  small compared
 with the  pathways  described above.   However, they can be extremely
 serious,  and, in certain situations,  they are sometimes  fatal.   The
 storage of acidic  foods  in  earthenware has resulted in  clinical lead
 poisoning (Mahaffey  1978);  however,  no estimates  of intake have been
 made from such  incidents.   On the other hand, lead  contamination  of
 distilled alcoholic  beverages are somewhat better studied.   Ball  and
 Sorenson  (1969)  estimated that 70 million gallons of  "moonshine"  are
 produced  annually.   Sandstead and co-workers (1970) found  that  30% of
 the moonshine samples  tested contained lead concentrations >1 mg/1.
 Consumption  of  1 I/day would result  in an intake  of 1 mg/day of lead.

     Commercially available wines also contain lead averaging -0.2 mg/1
 (Mahaffey  1978, U.S. EPA 1977).  Exposure to lead from this  source
 could result in an intake of 0.2-1 mg/day, depending on  the amount of
wine consumed (1-5 liters).

     The uptake of lead by food cooked in contaminated water has not
been quantified; however, Moore (1979) reported that most foods show a
positive uptake of lead from contaminated cooking water.  Because most
waters contain concentrations <0.05 mg/1, this exposure pathway is not
expected to be significant.
                                  5-23

-------
 5.2.2.2   Total  Dietary Intake --  Adults

      Over the past  30-40  years, various authors have estimated dietary
 intake of lead  in adults.   WHO (1977)  and Mahaffey (1978)  provide a
 detailed  review of  these  studies;  thus, they will not be discussed in
 detail here.  In addition,  because of  analytical problems,  some of the
 older estimates may be suspect.

     Tepper (1971)  estimated  an average intake  of  137  ue/dav.
 Kolbye jet al. (1974)  estimated average intakes  of 57-233 yg/day,
 depending on how the  trace  and undetected values were dealt with.
 Gross (1979) reporting the  results of  the Kehoe lead balance experi-
 ments, found an overall average dietary intake  of 180 yg/day (159  yg/day,
 using median data). These estimates  of dietary  intake represent the mean
 or typical intake.  Thus, it  is apparent that the "average" adult  con-
 sumes 100-200 ug lead/day in  food.   However,  Gross (1979)  reported a
 maximum intake  (mean  for an individual) of  334  yg/day.

      Intake does vary  greatly betx>reen  individual and on  a daily basis.
 Up to 50% of this intake may  be a  result of  lead solder  in  cans.   The
 remaining intake cannot be  allocated to particular sources;  however,  it
 probably  results  from  contamination  during processing  and the  other
 sources described above.

     In addition, persons living near  areas  of  high lead emissions may
 ingest even higher  doses of lead.   Kerin (1972)  found  that  the persons
 living near a lead  smelter  ingested  640-2640  yg/day in the  diet, probably
 as a result of  the  contamination of  local crops.

 5.2.2.3   Total  Dietary  Intake  — Infants  and  Children

     Kolbye and  co-workers  (1974)   estimated  dietary intake  of  6-month-
 old children eating adult table food and  infant  foods.   These  authors
 found that the  average intake  ranged from 100-140  yg/day.   Stewart and
 Skeberdis  (1975) found that infants from  1-12 months consumed  93 ± 36
 yg/day.    Boppel  (1975) estimated that a  6-month-old infant  (7.2 kg)  fed
 commercial baby  food would have a  lead  intake of 45  yg/day.   Breast-fed
 infants are probably exposed  to somewhat lower  levels of lead  (Moore
 1979, Walker 1980),  in general, because breast milk has  been shown to
 contain 6-59 yg/1 lead.  Canned milk or  formula would contain  higher
 concentrations of lead, perhaps in the  range  of  200 yg/1 as reported by
Mitchell  and Aldous (1974) for evaporated milk.   Walker  (1980)  found a
 range of  50-500  yg/1 in canned infant formula.  Formula  diluted with
water would generally contain  less than 50 \ig/l.  However, concentrations
may be much higher in formula  diluted with contaminated water, similar to
 concentrations reported for electric kettles.  The  use of these products
 in preparing infant formula has resulted in severe  lead  poisoning  (Wigle
and Charlebois 1978).

     Older children may be exposed to somewhat lower levels of lead in
 food.  Kolbye and co-workers  (1974) estimated a dietary  intake of
                                  5-24

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
I
I
I
 75 yg/day for a 2-year-old child.   Mahaffey (1976) studied children
 aged 6-47 months.   In 1975, she found a daily intake ranging from 12-
 505 yg Pb/day with a mean intake of 110 ug/day, and a median of 76 pg/
 day.  In 1976, a similar study showed a range of 11-719 yg/day, with a
 mean intake of 115 yg/day and a median of 95 yg/day.  Lead intake for
 the highest decile was 316 yg/day (Mahaffey 1976).

      The specific  sources associated with lead in the diet of children
 are unknown.   However, lead solder in cans is likely to be at least as
 significant a source for children as it is for adults (up to 50% of
 dietary intake).   For an infant consuming canned formula, this source,
 as well as contamination during processing, would result in 100% of
 the dietary intake.

 5.2.3  Populations Exposed Through Drinking Water

 5.2.3.1  Pathways  of Exposure

      Surface  and groundwaters in the United States generally contain
 low concentrations of lead (see Chapter 4.0).   Similarly,  25% of the
 2595 tap water samples contained undetectable  levels of lead.   However,
 41 of these samples  contained concentrations >50 yg/1,  perhaps  serving
 around 2% of  the population (U.S.  DREW 1970).   Lead  service  lines,
 plumbing,  solder,  and storage containers  can result  in  contamination
 of drinking water.   In general,  these lead concentrations  are related
 to pH and hardness of the  water,  the length of  the household lead  pipe.
 the amount  of  lead in the  pipe,  and  the position of  the pipe.   A low pH
 is generally  considered  the most important factor that  contributes  to'
 high concentrations  of lead in drinking water.

      The presence  of  a low pH and  soft  water is  well  known in the  Boston
 and Seattle areas.  Greathouse  et.  al.  (1976) reported that drinking
 water  from  25%  of  the households sampled  in Boston exceeded  50  yg/1, and
 Dangel  (1975) reported that 24%  of the  water in  Seattle  exceeded this
 level.

      Cambridge  and Somerville, Massachusetts also have  had high  levels
 of  lead  in  drinking water;  14.5  and  30% of  the households  surveyed
 showed water lead  levels of greater  than  50 yg/1.  It has  been estimated
 that about  half of the buildings in  these  cities have some lead service
 pipe.  The  initiation  of pH adjustment  in  1975, however, reduced the
 lead levels in households  that had exceeded the  standard to  less than
 about 20 yg/1 in Cambridge  (Karalekas et al. 1976).

     Other  cities with levels of lead greater than 50 yg/1 have also
been reported, including Worcester, Massachusetts  (O'Brien 1976);
 Bennington, Vermont (Taylor 1977), and New Bedford, Massachusetts
 (Karalekas et al.  1978).  Rural water supplies have also been identi-
 fied as having elevated lead levels in drinking water, such as
Chesterfield County, South Carolina, where 10.3% of the 217 samples
 taken exceeded 50 yg/1 (Sandhu _et al. 1977).'
                                 5-25

-------
     The prevalence of elevated lead  levels  in  drinking waters  in the
United States today is difficult  to evaluate for  several  reasons.   One,
the use of lead pipes is not well documented.   In a survey  of water
utilities reported by Donaldson (1924), 51%  of  the 539 cities surveyed
indicated that they used lead or  lead-lined  services  to some extent.
It is unlikely that the situation has  changed drastically since that
time.  Patterson and O'Brien (1979) reported that nearly  half of  the
100 largest cities in the U.S. distribute corrosive water,  and  many have
some portion of lead pipes.  Thus, it  appears that there  is a potential
for a large portion of the population  to receive  lead at  levels greater
than 50 yg/1 in drinking water.   However, such  approaches as pH adjust-
ment and treatment with zinc orthophosphate  are being used  to control
corrosion (Karalekas _e_t _al. 1976).

5.2.3.2  Drinking Water Exposure  — Adults

     Drinking water is sometimes  included in the  estimates of dietary
exposure described above.  Often,  this is not well documented,  however.
for the purposes of this report,  a consumption of  2 I/day water will  be
assumed for adults, in addition to the dietary consumption of lead.
Thus, most adults would ingest <20 ug/day lead in  drinking water.   Al-
though the population sizes are unknown, a small proportion of  the  popu-
lation would be exposed to 100 ug/day  from this source, and an  extremely
limited subpopulation would be exposed to 2 mg/day in drinking water.

5.2.3.3  Drinking Water Exposure — Infants  and Children

     A drinking water consumption of 1 I/day will be assumed for infants
and children, thus reducing the intakes estimated above by one-half.
Therefore, the respective subpopulations would receive <10 ygVday,
50 yg/day, and 1 mg/day in drinking water.

5.2.4  Populations Exposed Through Inhalation (Air, Dirt,  and Dust)

5.2.4.1  Pathways of Exposure

     The major source of lead in the atmosphere is automobile emission
(see Chapters 3.0 and 4.0).  Local contamination of air around smelters,
battery manufacturers,  etc. also results in human exposure.   Adults are
directly exposed through inhalation of ambient air.  The exposure pathway
for children is far more complicated because deposited particulates
result in contamination of dust and dirt.   Intentional or  inadvertent
ingestion of lead from this source is  not  easily quantified and will be
discussed later in this section.

     Concentrations of lead reported in air have been discussed in
Chapter 4.0.   The U.S.  EPA (1977)  also provides  a discussion on this
subject.   For the purposes here, various concentrations typical of
certain situations have been assumed (see  Table  5-1).
                                   5-26

-------
1
1

1
^B
1
m

1
1



1
1
1




TABLE

S ub populat ion

Smelters, battery
etc.
Urban
Outdoors
Indoors0
TOTAL

Rural (suburban)
Outdoors
Indoors
TOTAL
Remote
alnhalation of 20
outdoors.
h


5-1. HUMAN EXPOSURE TO LEAD THROUGH INHALATION

Cone Inhalation Adults3 Inhalation Childb
(jig/m3) (yg/day) (yg/day)
operations, 10 200 40


1-4 13-53 2.7-10.8
0.3-1.4 2-9.4 0.4-1.8
15-62 3.1-12.6


0.1-1 1.3-13 • 0.3-3
0.03-0.3 0.2-2 .04-0.4
1.5-15 .34-3.4
<-02 0.4 0.08
m /day assumed for adults spending 1/3 time indoors, 2/3
T
          Inhalation of 4 m /day for 1-year old child spending 1/3 time indoors, 2/3
         outdoors.

          Concentrations assumed to be 1/3 outdoors.

 t
 I       Source:   See Section 4.2.2 for concentrations of lead in air.



I



I



I



I


•                                           5-27

-------
                                              I
                                              I
 5.2.4.2  Inhalation Exposure — Adults

      Inhalation estimates of lead for adults have also been described           I
 in Table 5-1.   A respiratory flow of 20 m3/day was assumed.  Potential          •
 exposure appears to be highest in urban areas*and near lead-related
 industries.                                                                      •

 5-2.4.3  Inhalation Exposure — Infants and Children

      Inhalation for a one-year-old child was assumed in Table 5-1.   The         |
 patterns of  exposure are  the same as those seen in adults.   Older
 children would  experience increasingly high total exposure  to lead.              m

 5.2.5   Populations  Exposed Through Other Routes

 5.2.5.1  Cigarettes                                                             •

     Lead has been  reported in cigarettes at concentrations up  to
 39  mg/kg (Cogbill and Hobbs 1957).   This has been primarily attributed          •
 to  past uses of lead arsenate  (Mahaffey 1978, WHO 1977).  WHO (1977)             "
 estimated, assuming a 27,  transfer rate from mainstream smoke, that a
 person  smoking  20 cigarettes/day  would inhale 1-5 yg/day.                        •

 5.2.5.2  Dirt and Dust

     Lead reaches dirt and  dust through various  pathways  (see Figure 5-1).       I
 Of  particular importance  are automobile and  smelter  emissions and losses
 from painted surfaces  that  result  in  soil contamination.  Monitoring            —
 data (see Chapter 4.0) have shown  that levels approaching 8,000 mg/kg            I
 in  soil can result  in  the vicinity of  such  sources.  Household  dust  and          ™
 street  dust also exhibit  elevated  concentrations.  Old  orchard  sites and
manufacturing sites  may also have high levels of  lead.                           M

     These levels are probably not of  great  significance for adults;
however,  children are susceptible  to  this exposure route through  inges-
 tion of  dirt and dust, and mouthing of  contaminated  hands and other
 objects.  Lepow_et  al. (1974) examined  ten children with chronically
high PbB  levels.  These authors determined that nine of the ten children
studied  exhibited excessive mouthing.   Three of the  children had  their
hands or nonfood items in their mouths  during 50% of the observation
time.  The mean lead in the samples from  the childrens1 hands was
2400 yg/g.  This study estimated that  if a small  child playing in dirt
with a lead concentration of only 1200  yg/g mouthed his fingers 10 times/
day, ingesting 10 mg of dirt/mouthing,  this child would ingest 120 yg/day
of lead.  The same calculation using household dust  (with a concentration
of 11,000 yg/g)  would result in an exposure of 1100 yg/day  (Lepow et al.
1974).   Unfortunately, little is known about such behavior patterns~~of~
children.  These estimates, however, do not appear unreasonable and may
be common in areas with contaminated soil and dust.
5-28

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
J
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 5.2.5.3  Paint

      The ingestion of paint chips by children is commonly thought  to be
 the most prevalent route of lead exposure for children in the United
 States today.  Paints used before World War II contained lead at levels
 greater than 1% (10,000 mg/kg).  In 1974, a marketplace survey found
 that 70.8% of the oil-based paints and 96.1% of the water-based paints
 sampled contained< 0.06% lead, which is the recommended maximum permis-
 sible level in paint (Committee on Toxicology 1976).  However, numerous
 old buildings still exist with chipped and peeling paint that contain
 higher levels of lead.   Gilsinn (1972) estimates that 7 million housing
 units are old enough to contain high levels of lead.

      This problem is especially severe for children having pica.   It
 appears common in children,  especially l-to-3-year-olds;  estimates suggest
 that one-third to one-half of the children in this age bracket have pica.
 Unfortunately, little is known about the amount of paint  ingested.
 However,  only small amounts  (a 1-milligram chip)  of paint containing
 l%^lead are required to result in an exposure of  1 mg/day (Mahaffey
 1978).   Such an exposure would probably be common in children having
 pica and who are exposed to  lead at  such levels.

 5.2.5.4  Other Routes

      Numerous  other  exposure  routes  for lead  are  generally considered
 to  be minor.   For  example, ingestion of newsprint,  curtain weights,
 lead paint  on  kitchen utensils,  decorative decals,  and lead  stearate
 used in PVC pipes  can all  result in  exposure  to lead (WHO 1977, Mahaffev
 1978).   These  exposure  routes  are expected to be  important only in
 isolated  situations  and  have not been  included here.

 5-2.6   Blood Levels Associated with Various Subpopulations

     Bell and  co-workers (1979)  report  a survey of  the literature shows PbB
 levels  in rural or urban areas in the range of 9-24  ug/100 ml with most
 values vL6  ug  lead/100 ml blood.  Gross  (1979) reported an overall mean PbB
 level in a  sample of adults of 25 ug/100 ml, and individual mean levels
 ranged from 18-40 ug/100 ml.  WHO (1977) estimated  that each 100 ug  of oral
 intake from dietary sources contributes about 6-18 ug of lead/100 ml of
blood.  Thus, as expected, dietary intake accounts for most of the lead
in the blood of adults.

     In addition, numerous studies have been conducted to determine  the
 importance  of air concentrations in contributing to lead in blood.
These studies are reviewed in U.S. EPA  (1977)  and Bell et al. (1979)
and will not be discussed in detail here.  In total, these studies
appear to indicate that  the contribution of air lead to blood lead
ranges from 0.6-2.0 ug/100 ml in blood/ug lead/m3 in air.   In general,
blood lead concentrations do  not correlate well with air concentrations
because the effects are  masked by intake from other sources,  primarily
food.  However, urban levels  of blood lead have been shown to be
                                  5-29

-------
 significantly  higher  than suburban levels  (Tepper and Levin 1972).
 The  geometric  mean blood  lead  (age and  smoking  adjusted)  for urban
 areas was  18 yg/100 ml  and 16  ug/100  ml for rural.   Assuming a log-normal
 distribution,  <5% of  the  urban population  would have PbB  levels >30 yg/
 100  ml;  and <0.5% of  the  rural population  (U.S.  EPA 1977).

     A relationship between blood  lead  and distance from  highways  has
 also been  observed.   Daines and co-workers (1972)  found that mean  PbB
 levels for black women  living  3.7,  38.1, and 121.9  meters from a highway
 were 23.1, 17.6, and  17.4  yg/100 ml,  respectively.

     Levels of blood  lead  in persons  living near smelters are also
 elevated.  Landrigan  et al. (1975)  found that 16% of  the  individuals
 over 19  living near the smelter in El Paso,  Texas had PbB levels
 >40  yg/100 ml.

     In  addition, relationships  between blood lead  and levels in drinking
 water have been observed.   Moore and  co-workers  (1977) found  that  the
 mean PbB level rose as  the  cube  root  of the  "first  draw"  of water.  Thus,
 they estimated that PbB levels  at  water concentrations of 50  and 100  yg/1
 would be about 20 yg/100 ml and  22  yg/100  ml, respectively.   Although
 this may represent a  significant difference, the example  indicates  that
 drinking water does not contribute  greatly  to lead  exposure in  adults,
 except at  very high concentrations.

     In general, elevated PbB levels  (>15  yg/100 ml)  have been  related
 to such factors as residency in urban areas, near highways, and  near
 smelters.  Blood levels of  lead  >40 yg/100 ml in adults are found in
 these areas.

     Blood levels of  lead in children are  consistently higher than  those
 of adults  in the same environment.  Lead screening programs detect  about
 40,000 children annually with PbB levels >30 yg/100 ml.   However, this
 figure represents only a proportion of  those children in  the United
 States who actually exceed  this level.  McFeatters  (1976)  reports that
 the U.S.  Department of Housing and Urban Development  estimates  that at
 least 600,000 U.S.  children have high levels of lead  in their blood.
 The preceding discussion indicates  that the largest route of exposure
 for children with pica is the ingestion of paint, dirt, and dust.  The
 source of  this contamination is primarily paint in rural areas,  auto-
mobile emissions in urban areas, and smelter or other industrial
 emissions near sources.   Numerous studies have been conducted to
determine  the relative importance of these various routes  and sources.
Again,  these have been described extensively in U.S. EPA  (1977)  and
Bell e£ _al. (1979)  and will only be discussed briefly here.

     The distance of residence from a highway has been correlated with
PbB levels of children.   Caprio and co-workers (1974) found that >57%
of the children living within 100 feet of roadways had PbB levels
>40 yg/100 ml.   More than 27% of those living 100-200 feet from  the
                                  5-30

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
highway and 31% of those living greater than 200 feet away had similar
levels.  Although this study indicated a localized effect on PbB levels,
the pathway of exposure could have been inhalation or ingestion of dirt
and dust.

     Billick and co-workers (undated-a) examined 170,000 records from
1976 of children's PbB levels in New York.  These authors found that
blacks had higher PbB levels than whites or Hispanics.  In addition, a
peak in PbB levels was observed during the summer each year.  The highest
PbB levels were found in the 2-to-4-year-old age bracket.  In addition, a
general downward trend was observed in PbB levels during these years.
This was attributed to the lead screening program, decrease in paint
exposure, and changes in environmental lead exposure.  The air lead
concentrations, ethnic group,  and age were highly significant factors
in determining PbB levels and explained 63-65% of the variation in PbB
levels.

     In a follow-up study, Billick and co-workers (undated-b) evaluated
lead in gasoline as an indicator of exposure.  They found that gasoline
lead (as measured by sales) is a highly significant variable.  They
developed a model that explained 75% of the variation in PbB level by
age, race, season, and leaded gasoline sales.  Using the model, these
authors estimated the geometric mean concentration for children in the
absence of gasoline lead to be 10.1 pg/100 ml for the first quarter.
In comparison, the yearly geometric mean for black, Hispanic, and white
children of the same age was 21.2, 19.2, and 19.3 ug/100 ml, respectively.
These results suggest a reduction of about 50% in childrens' PbB levels
in urban areas with the phasing out of lead in gasoline.  The ambient air
contributed little to the variation in blood, after gasoline lead had
been considered.  These authors suggest that inhalation was only secon-
dary to ingestion of dirt and dust.

     Angle and Mclntire (1979) investigated the correlation of childhood
PbB level with lead in air, soil, and house dust.  A multivariate analysis
showed that PbB levels for preschool children was positively correlated
with house dust and soil (11% of the variance) and PbB levels in children
6-18 was significantly correlated with air, soil, and house dust (21% of
the variance).  However, 38% of the variation was a result of the differ-
ence between samples from an individual.

     The U.S. EPA (1977) concluded that observable increases in PbB
levels occur at soil or dust lead exposures of 500-1000 mg/kg.   In a
summary of soil lead/blood lead relationships on children, these authors
found a mean increase of 3-6% in lead blood for a two-fold increase in
soil lead levels.

     Lead paint is a well known source of elevated blood levels in
children (U.S. EPA 1977, WHO 1977, Bell et_ al.  1979).  In general,
however, the contribution of paint to levels in blood is difficult to
distinguish from the contribution of lead in soil and dust, especially
in urban areas.  Cohen and co-workers (1973) found that the mean PbB
                                  5-31

-------
 level  for  230  children  (1-5  years  old)  in two rural counties was
 22.8 ± 11.0  ug/100 ml.  More than  one-half of the children lived in
 houses more  than  twenty-five years old,  one-quarter of  which had flaking
 paint  or plaster.  The  presence  of lead  in paint  or plaster is  not the
 only condition that must be  met  to increase levels  of lead in the blood;
 the paint  must also be  peeling or  chipping.   In addition,  for exposure
 to occur,  it must be  ingested.   As a  result,  it is  difficult to correlate
 lead in paint  with PbB  levels in children (U.S. EPA 1977).

     Children  with high PbB  levels are also concentrated around indus-
 trial  sources  of  lead,  especially  smelters.   Most recently,  Walter and
 co-workers (1980) studied PbB levels  in  the areas surrounding a primary
 lead smelter in the Idaho Silver Valley.   These authors found that 98.9%
 of the children surveyed in  1974 (ages 1-9)  that  resided closest to the
 smelter had  PbB levels  >40 ug/100  ml  and  59.7% had  levels  >60 ug/100 ml.
 A multiple regression analysis for each year  of age  showed  that air lead
 was the most significant variable  influencing PbB level.   The next most
 important variable was  levels of lead in  household  dust, primarily in
 children younger  than four.  Soil  lead was  also a significant factor in
 determining  blood lead.  Pica was  significant at  age 2 years, and  25%
 increase in  blood lead  was predicted  in a child with pica.   In  addition,
 sex, and occupation of  the parent  were significant variables,.   These
 authors also noted that inhalation  is probably not the major  pathway of
 absorption.  Lead was apparently deposited  and ingested.

     A follow-up survey conducted  in 1975 showed  that PbB levels were
 somewhat reduced, probably because of emigration, treatment of  children
 with high PbB  levels, increased  cleanliness,  replacement of highly
 contaminated topsoil, and reduction of lead emissions (Walter jet al.
 1980).   Today,  almost all children have PbB levels <60 ug/100 ml,  and
 most have levels <40 ug/100 ml (Anonymous 1979a).

     Similar results, although less severe, have been reported  from  the
 lead smelter in El Paso, Texas.   About 70% of the children 1-4  years old
 living near  this smelter had PbB levels >40 ug/100 ml,  and 14%  had PbB
 levels  >60 ug/100 ml (Landrigan et al. 1975).

     Baker and co-workers (1977)  examined lead absorption in children in
nineteen U.S. towns with primary nonferrous smelters and compared  them
with children of the same age in towns without smelters.  This  included
all primary lead,  zinc,  and copper smelters, with the exception of the
smelters in El Paso,  Texas,  Kellogg, Idaho, Tacoma, Washington, and East
Helena, Montana, because these towns had already been studied.  They
 found that PbB levels were significantly elevated in children living
around two zinc smelters,  but not near the two lead smelters.  However,
hair-lead levels were elevated in these areas.

     Elevated lead levels have also been reported in the vicinity of
secondary smelters and battery plants  (U.S. EPA 1977).   PbB levels
>30 ug/100 ml appear to  be common in these areas.
                                  5-32

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
      In summary, elevated lead levels  (a term difficult to define, but
 generally meaning >30 yg/1) have been  reported in numerous situations
 for children.  Exposure to lead-containing paint, dirt, and dust are
 probably the major sources of exposure.  Contaminated dirt and dust can
 result from paint, automobile emissions, and industrial emissions from
 such sources as primary and secondary  smelters and battery plants.

 5.2.7  Summary — Exposure Scenarios

 5.2.7.1  Introduction

      This section will attempt to isolate certain subpopulations and
 determine their total exposure to lead.  In addition, an attempt will
 be made to identify important routes and sources  of exposure.   Although
 these situations are somewhat hypothetical, they  are based on the data
 available in this section and the preceding ones  in order to represent
 typical examples of exposure.

      This section concentrates on total intake; however,  for comparison
 of routes,  the absorbed  dose  must be considered.   As discussed in the
 previous  section,  the absorption  of  lead depends  on a number of  factors,
 such as particle size, physiochemical form  of  lead,  route,  and extent
 of exposure,  as well as  host  factors,  such  as  age and nutritional status.
 For the estimates  presented here,  absorption of lead from  the  gastro-
 intestinal  tract of adults will be assumed  at  10%.   Absorption of
 ingested  lead  by children is  assumed to be  50%.   Deposition of inhaled
 lead is assumed to  be 30% and  100% of  deposited lead is assumed  to be
 absorbed.   Little  is  known about  absorption of inhaled lead by children;
 however,  it  is  assumed to be  the  same  as  adults,  although  it may  be
 greater.

 5.2.7.2  Exposure Estimates

     Exposure  estimates  for children and adults in different situations
 are  summarized  in Table  5-2.   Figures 5-2 and 5-3 show the  estimated
 exposure  for adults and  children living in  rural, urban, and industrial
 (smelters, etc.) environments.  The  relative importance of  the various
 routes  are shown using the estimates derived earlier  in this section.
 For adults, food is the greatest source of  exposure in all the exposure
 scenarios shown in Figures 5-2 and 5-3.  Intake of lead in food was
 considered the same (200 yg/day) in urban and rural areas; however, near
 smelters, it was assumed to be 1000 yg/day because of contamination of
 local crops.  Drinking water intakes for all the scenarios shown in
 Figures 5-2 and 5-3 were assumed to be <20 yg/day, because most drinking
waters  contain <10 yg/1.   However, concentrations  of 50 yg/1 in rural
 areas would increase the contribution of lead from this source from 9 to
 31%.  This effect would not be as  dramatic in urban and industrial areas.
Highly contaminated drinking water (1 mg/1)  would  overshadow all other
sources of exposure (see Table 5-2).
                                  5-33

-------
                                                TABLE  5-2.  EXPOSURE ESTIMATES OK LEAD FOR ADULTS  AND CHILDREN  LIVING  IN
                                                           RURAL, URBAN, AND INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS
    Population
   Adults
                       Location
                      Rural
                                               Route
Oi
to
                      Urban
                                          Food
                                         Drinking Water
                                         Inhalation
                                         Food
                      Smelting Areas
                                         Drinking Water
                                         Inhalation
Food
                                                                         Source
                       Total Diet
                       Moonshine
                       Wine

                       Most Supplies
                       Contaminated
                       Highly Contaminated

                       Suburban
                       Remote
                       Cigarettes

                       Total Diet
                       Moonshine
                       Wine
Most Supplies
Contaminated
Highly Contaminated

Urban Air
Cigarettes

Total Diet
Moonshine
Wine
Assumption

1 mg/1, 1 I/day
0.2 rag/1, I/day
0.2 mg/k, 5 I/day
<10 Mg/1, 2 I/day
>50 Mg/1, 2 I/day
> 1000 Mg/1, 2 I/day
See Table 5-1
See Table 5-1
-

1 mg/1, 1 I/day
0.2 mg/1, 1 I/day
0.2 mg/1 5 I/day
<10 Mg/1, 2 I/day
>50 |jg/l, 2 I/day
>1000 Mg/1, 2 I/day
Intake
(Mg/day)
100-200
1000
200
1000
<20
>100
>2000
1.5-15
0.4
-
100-200
1000
200
1000
<20
>100
>2000
Ahiiorheil Doseu
(Mg/day)
10-20
100
20
100
<2
>10
>200
0.5-5
0.1
1-5
10-20
100
20
100
<2
>10
>200
                                                                                                   See  Table  5-1
                                                                                                   1 mg/1,  1  I/day
                                                                                                   0.2 mg/],  1  I/day
                                                                                                   0.2 mg/1,  5  I/day
                                                                                                                                 15-62
                                                                                       100-2640
                                                                                         1000
                                                                                          200
                                                                                         1000
  5-21
  1-5

10-264
   100
    20
   100

-------
                                                TABLE 5-2.  EXPOSURE ESTIMATES OP LEAD FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN  LIVING IN
                                                            R1IKAI., UKHAN, AND TNIHISTRIAI. KNVfKONMKNTS (Continued)
    Population
                       Location
                                               Route
                                          Drinking Water
                                           Inhalation
         Source

Most Supplies
Contaminated
Highly Contaminated

Ambient Air
Cigarettes
     Assumption

<1() MK/I, 2 I/day
>50 ug/1, 2 I/day
>1000 ug/1, 2  I/day

10 ng/m3, 20 m3/day
                                                                  Intake
                                                                 dig/day)
                                                                   *20
                                                                  > 100
                                                                 >2000
                                                                                                                                     200
Absorbed Itose
   (pg/day)
      <2

    >200

      60
     1-5
    Children
                        Rural
                                           Pood
                                                                 Total  Diet
                                                                                                                                     100
Cri
 I
w
ui
                                           Drinking Water
                                           Inhalation
Most Supplies
Contaminated
Highly Contaminated

Ambient Air
                                   <10  iig/1,  1  I/day
                                   <50  „(./!,  1  I/day
                                   >1000  HB/I,  1  I/day

                                   See  Table  5-1
                                 <50
                               > 1000

                              0.34-3.4
                                                                                                                                                        bOO
                                                                                                                                                       0.1-1
                                           Pica
lead faint
Paint or Otherwise
Contaminated Dirt
                                    12  lead,  1  rag chip             1000
                                    1000  ug/g lead in dirt,         100
                                    10  mg/mouthing,  10 moutilings/
                                    day
                                                    500
                                                     50
                        Urban
                                           Food
                                                                  Total Diet
                                                                                                                                     100
                                                                                                                                                          50
                                           Drinking  Water
Most Supplies
Contaminated
Highly Contaminated
                                    <10 ug/1.  1 I/day
                                    <50 ug/1,  1 I/day
                                    >1000 ug/1, 1 I/day
                                                                                                                                     <50
                                                                                                                                   > 1000
                                                     <5
                                                    <25
                                                   >500
                                           Inhalation
                                                                  Ambient Air
                                                                                                         T.ihlo  5-1
                                                                                                                                   3.1-12.6
                                           Pica
                                                                  Lead Paint
                                                                  Dirt

                                                                  Dust
                                    IZ lead, 1 rag chip              1000
                                    1000 ug/g  lead in dust           100
                                    10 mg/mouthing, 10 mouth ings/
                                    day
                                    10,000 |ig/g lead in dust        1000
                                    10 HI;; .lust/mouthing,  10
                                    mouth ings/day
                                                                                       500
                                                                                        50


                                                                                       500

-------
                                                    TABLE 5-2.   EXPOSURE ESTIMATES OF LEAD KOR ADULTS AND UULDRBN LIVING IN
                                                                RURAL,  URBAN, AND INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS (Continued)
Population
                           Location
                           Smelting Areas
     Route

Food

Drinking Water
                                                                      Source

                                                             Total Diet

                                                             Most Supplies
                                                             Contaminated
                                                             Highly Contaminated
      Assumption

Assumed to be half of
adult
<10 ug/1, 1  I/day
<50 Mg/1. 1  I/day
>1000 Mg/l,  1 I/day
 Intake
(ng/day)
  500
                                                                                                                                       <50
                                                                                                                                     >1000
Absorbed Dose
   (lig/day)
     250

      <5
     <.25
    >500
                                              Inhalation
                                                                     Anihlent  Air
                                                                                                            Table 5-1
                                                                                                                                                           12
                                              Pica
U>
                                                                     Lead  Paint
                                                                     Dirt

                                                                     Dust
                                                                                                17.  lead, 1 rap, chip
                                                                                                1000 ug/g lead  In dirt,
                                                                                                10 ing/mouthing,  10 mouthlngs/
                                                                                                day                             100
                                                                                                10.000 |ig/g  lead in dnut       1000
                                                                                                10 nig dust/mouthing,  10
                                                                                                mouth ings/day
                                                  500

                                                   50
                                                  500
          A 10Z absorption of Ingested  lead Is assumed for adults and 50% for children.  Deposition  of  inhaled  lead Is assumed
          to be 30% and 100% of deposited lead Is assumed to be absorbed.
        Source:  See text.

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
                  Air - 1%
      Rural Areas —
      20 ug/day
                                                  Drinking
                                      Drinking     Water
                                      Water - 1%
                                                                        (lead solder in
                                                                        cans - 25%)
Urban Areas —40 jug/day
                                              Food
                                              (62%)
                                      (lead solder in
                                      cans - 31%)
                         Smelters, Lead Works, etc. — 160 Mg/day



Note:   Concentrations < 10 jug/2 in drinking water were assumed for these estimates, and no con-
        sumption of wine or moonshine containing lead.  In addition, these situations did not include
        exposure from smoking.


Source:  Arthur D.  Little, Inc., estimates.


                     FIGURE 5-2  EXPOSURE SCENARIOS - ADULTS
                                   (ABSORBED DOSE)
                                           5-37

-------
                Drinking Water - 1%
                                                  Food (4%)
Drinking Water and
   • Air- 1%
                    Paint and
                    Paint
                    Contaminated
                    Dirt
                    (90%)
     Rural -560M9/day
     Paint,
     Dirt,
     and
     Dust
     (94%)
                                Drinking Water
                                and Air -  1%
                     Smelters, Lead Works, etc. - 1300M9/day
Source: Arthur D. Little, Inc., estimates.
FIGURE 5-3   EXPOSURE SCENARIOS - CHILDREN WITH PICA (ABSORBED DOSE)
                                    5-38

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
     If moonshine is consumed (1 liter containing 1 mg/l/day), this
source of exposure would be far greater than any other source.  Wines
would have to be consumed in large amounts (5 I/day containing 200 ug/1
lead) in order to be the dominant exposure route in lead industrial
areas.  However, consumption of 1 I/day would represent about 50% of
the total absorbed dose in rural areas, and 30% in urban areas.  The
increase in total exposure from rural to urban areas is a result of
the increased exposure through inhalation; primarily due to lead
emissions from automobiles.  Even in urban areas, however, food is at
least as significant a source if not more significant than air.  The
increased exposure in the vicinity of smelters and  perhaps other lead
industries is related to increased inhalation and perhaps increased

levels of lead in foods.

     These results suggest that elimination of lead solder in cans would
reduce exposure by, at most, -6-50% in adults, depending on the subpopu-
lation exposed.  In addition, the elimination of lead in gasoline would
reduce exposure in urban areas by about 35% (assuming no reduction in
solder in cans).  If lead were eliminated from cans as well as from
gasoline, exposure could be reduced by about 60%.  However, persons
consuming large amounts of lead in drinking xcater, moonshine, or wine
would not experience such reduction in exposure.  These estimates are
only an approximation and are intended to demonstrate the relative
nature of exposure of lead to adults.


     Similar exposure scenarios for children with pica are illustrated
in Figure 5-3.  As expected, consumption of paint, dirt, and dust
containing lead represents the largest exposure route for these children.
Exposure to children without pica would be much lower, for example, 560 as
compared to-50 ug/day in rural areas.  la urban and industrial areas,
children without pica may be exposed to somewhat higher levels than
would be expected because dirt and dust may be contaminated,  and mouthing
of objects and hands can result in exposure.


      In the scenarios shown in Figure 5-3, concentrations of  lead in
drinking water were assumed <10 ug/1.  However, higher levels in drinking
water would probably not contribute greatly to exposure for children with
pica.  It would be a significant source for infants and children without

pica.

     The increase in exposure from rural, urban, and industrial areas is
primarily a result of the increase in lead levels of soil and dust.
Gross estimates were made in order to evaluate the importance of this
source in total exposure to children.  However, even if these estimates
were  reduced by an order of magnitude, consumption of paint,  dirt, and
dust would still constitute the major source of exposure for  children.
                                  5-39

-------
                               REFERENCES
Alexander,  F.W.;  Delves,  H.T.;  Clayton,  B.E.   The uptake and excretion
by  children of  lead  and other contaminants.   In:   Proceedings of the
international symposium;  Environmental health aspects of lead, 1972,
May 2-6, Amsterdam.   Luxembourg,  Commission  of the European Communities-
1973:   319-330.   (As cited  in WHO 1977)

Ahlberg, J.; Ramel,  C.; Wachtmeister,  C.A.   Organolead compounds shown
to  be genetically active.   Ambio  1:29; 1972.   (As cited in Grand-jean
and Nielsen 1979)

Angle,  C.;  Mclntire,  M.   Environmental lead  and children:   the Omaha
study.  J.  Toxicol.  Environ. Health  5:855-870;  1979.

Anonymous.   Lead  in  canned  food to be  reduced.  Chemical and Engineerins
News 57 (37):20; 1979a.

Anonymous.   FDA-er reports  lead concentrations  are higher  from stored
opened  cans.  Food Chemical News; November 19,  1979b:   23.

Amvig, E. ; Grandjean, P.; Beckmann, J.  Neurotoxic effects  of heavy
lead exposure determined with psychological  tests.  Toxicol.  Lett.  5:393-
404; 1980.

Baker,  E.L., Jr.; Hayes, C.G.; Landrigan, P.J.; Handke,  J.L.;  Leger,  R.T.;
Houseworth, W.J.; Harrington, J.M.  A nationwide  survey  of heavy metal
absorption  in children living near primary copper,  lead  and  zinc smelters.
Am.  J. Epidemiol. 106:261-273; 1977.

Ball, G.V.; Sorenson, L.B.  Pathogenesis of hyperuricemia in  saturine
gout.  New  Engl. J.  Med.  280:1199-1202; 1969.   (As  cited by Mahaffey
1978)                                                               ^

Barry, P.S.I.  A comparison of concentration of lead in human  tissues.
Brit. J. Ind. Med. 32:119-139; 1975.  (As cited by WHO 1977)

Barry, P.S.I.  Distribution and storage of lead in human tissues.   The
biogeochemistry of lead in the environment.   Part B.  Biological effects.
Nriagu,  J.D. (ed.) New York:  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press;
1978:  97-150.

Barton,  J.C.; Conrad, M.E.  Effects of ethanol on the absorption and
retention of lead.  Proc.  Soc.  Exp. Biol. Med. 159(2):213-218; 1978.

Bauchinger,  M.;  Schmid, E.  Mutat. Res. 14:95-100; 1972.  (As  cited by
Kazantzis and Lilly 1979)
                                   5-40

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
           Boyland, E.; Dukes, C.E.; Grover, P.L.; Mitchley, B.C.V.  The induction
           of renal tumors by feeding lead acetate to rats.  Brit. J. Cancer  16:283-
 •         1962. '  (As  cited by IARC 1972)
I

I

I

I

I

I
 Bauchinger, M.; Schmid, E.; Schmidt, D.  Chromosomenanalyse bei
 verkehrspohzisten mit erhohter bledast.  Mutat. Res. 16:407-412'  1972
 (As cited by WHO 1977).

 Bauchinger, M.; Schmid, E.; Einbrodt, H.J.; Dresp, J.  Chromosome aberra-
 tions in lymphocytes after occupational exposure to lead and cadmium.
 Mutat. Res. 40:57-62; 1976.  (As cited by WHO 1977)

 Beek, B.;  Obe, G.   Experentia 30:1006-1007; 1974.  (As cited by Kazantzis
 and Lilly 1979)

 Bell, M.W.; Ewing,  R.A.;  Lutz,  G.A.; Holoman, V.L.; Paris, B.; Krause, H.H.;
 Hammond, P.B.   Reviews of the environmental effects of pollutants:  VII.
 Lead.  Report No.  EPA-600/1-78-029.  Columbus, OH:  U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency;  1979.   476 p.   Available from:  NTIS, Springfield, VA-
 PB80-12107 2.

 Billick, I.E.; Curran,  A.S.;  Shier, D.R.   Pediatric blood lead levels in
 New York.   (Submitted for publication)   Washington,  DC:  Environmental
 Research Group,  Department of Housing and Urban Development;  undated-a.

 Billick, I.E.; Curran,  A.S.;  Shier, D.R.   Relation of pediatric blood
 lead levels to lead in  gasoline.   (Submitted for publication)  Washington,
 DC:   Environmental  Research Group,  Department of Housing and  Urban
 Development;  undated-b.

 Bolanowska, W.   Distribution  and  excretion  of triethyllead  in  rats.
 Brit.  J. Ind.  Med.  25:203-208;  1968.   (As cited  by WHO  1977)

 Boppel,  B.  Bleigehalte von lebensmitteln in bleiaufnahme durch die
 tagliche Nahrung.   Z. Lebensm.-Unters. Forsch. 158:287-290; 1975.   (As
 cited  by Mahaffey 1978)
Bushnell, P.J.; Bowman, R.E.  Persistence of impaired reversal learning
in young monkeys exposed to low level of dietary lead.  J. Tox. Environ.
Health 5(6):1015-1023; 1979.

Bushnell, P.J.; Shelton, S.E.; Bowman, R.E.  Elevation of blood lead
concentration by confinement in the rhesus monkey.  Bull. Environ.
Contam. Toxicol. 22:819-826; 1979.

Butt, E.M.; Peason, H.E.; Simonsen, D.G.  Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
79:247-249; 1952.   (As cited by Rosen and Sorell 1978)

Butt, E.M.; Nusbaum,  R.E.; Gilmour, T.C.; Didio, S.L.; Sister Mariano.
Trace metal levels in human serum and blood.  Arch. Environ. Health
8:52-57;  1964.  (As cited by WHO 1977)
                                   5-41

-------
 Caprio,  R.J.; Margulis,  H.L.;  Joselow,  M.M.   Lead absorption in children
 and  its  relationship  to  urban  traffic  densities.   Arch.  Environ.  Health
 28:195-197;  1974.   (As cited by  U.S. EPA 1977)

 Cavalleri, A.; Minoia, C.;  Pozzoli,  L.;  Polatti,  F.;  Bolis,  P.F.   Lead
 in red blood cells  and in .plasma of  pregnant  women and their offspring.
 Environ. Res. 17(3):403-408; 1978.

 Center for Disease  Control.  Surveillance of  childhood and lead poisoning.
 U.S. Morbid. Mortal. Week.  Rep.  26:48;  1977.   (As cited  by U.S. EPA 1979)

 Chisolm, J.J., Jr.  Heme metabolites in  blood and urine  in relation to
 lead toxicity and their determination.   Adv.  Clin.  Chem.  20:225-265-
 1978.

 Chisolm, J.J., Jr.; Barltrop, D.  Recognition and management of children
 with increased lead absorption.   Arch. Dis. Child 54(4):249-262;  1979.

 Clarkson, T.W.; Kench, J.E.  Urinary excretion of amino  acids  by  men
 absorbing heavy metals.  Biochem. J. 62:361-372;  1956.   (As  cited fav
 WHO 1977)

 Cogbill, E.G.; Hobbs, M.E.  Transfer of  metallic  constituents  of
 cigarettes to mainstream smoke.   Tob. Sci. 144:24-29;  1957.   (As  cited
 by Mahaffey 1978).

 Cohen, M.M.   Biochemical aspects  of lead  neurotoxicity.   Handb. Clin.
 Neurol. 36:65-72; 1979.

 Cohen, G.J.; Bowers, G.N.; Lepow, M.  Epidemiology  of  lead poisoning.
 J. Am. Med.  Assoc. 266:1430-1433; 1973.   (As  cited  by WHO  1977)

 Coleman, I.P.L.; Hilburn, M.E.; Blair,  J.A.   The  intestinal  absorption
 of lead.  Biochem. Soc. Trans.  6(5):915-917;  1978.

Committee on Toxicology,  Assembly of Life Sciences, National Research
Council (NRC).   Recommendations for the prevention  of  lead poisoning
in children.   Washington, DC:   National Academy of  Science;  1976.    (As
cited by Mahaffey 1978).

Cooper, W.C.   Mortality in workers in lead production facilities  and
lead battery plants during the period 1971-1975.   A report to  Inter-
national Lead Zinc Research Organization, Inc.; 1978.  (As cited by
U.S.  EPA 1980)

Cooper, W.C.   Occupational lead exposure:  what are the risks?  Science
 208:129; 1980.

Cooper, W.C.; Gaffey,  W.R.   Mortality of  lead workers.  Occup. Med.
 17:100; 1975.  (As cited by U.S.  EPA 1980)
                                  5-42

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
I
 Cramer, K.;  et  al.  Renal  ultrastructure,  renal function and parameters
 of lead toxicity  in workers with  different periods  of lead exposure.
 Br. J. Ind.  Med.  31:113; 1974.   (As  cited  by U.S. EPA 1980)


 Cremer, J.E.  Toxicology and biochemistry  of alkyllead compounds.   Occup
 Health Rev.  17:14-19; 1965.  (As  cited by  WHO 1977)


 Daines, R.H.; Smith, D.W.; Feliciano, A.;  Trout, J.R.   Air levels  of lead
 inside and outside of homes.  Ind. Med.  Surg.  41:26-28:  1972.   (As cited
 by U.S. EPA  1977)


 Damstra,  T.  Toxicological properties of lead.  Environ.  Health Persp.
 19:297-307;  1977.                                                    H


 Dangel, R.A.  Study of corrosive products  in  the Seattle  water department
 Tolt distribution system.    Report No. EPA-670/2-75-036.   Cincinnati, OH:
 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency; 1975.   (As cited by  Mahaffey  1978)


 Deknudt,  G.; Leonard,  A.;  Ivanov, B.   Chromosome aberrations observed in
 male workers occupationally exposed to lead.  Environ. Physiol. Biochem
 3:132-138;  1973.  (As  cited by  WHO 1977)


 Deknudt,  Gh.; Manuel,  Y.;  Gerber,  G.B.  Chromosomal  aberrations in workers
 professionally exposed to  lead.   J.  Toxicol. Environ. Health 3(5-6):885-891;
 JL*7 / / *


 De la  Burde,  B.; Choate, M.S.   Does  asymptomatic lead exposure in children
 have  late sequelae?  J. Pediatr.  81:108;  1972.  (As  cited by U.S.  EPA 1980)


 De la  Burde,  B.; Choate, M.S.   Early  asymptomatic  lead exposure and
 development at  school  age.   J.  Pediatr. 87:638; 1975!  (As cited by
 U.S. EPA 1980)


 Der, R.; Fahin,  Z.; Hilderbrand, D.   Combined effect of lead  and low
 protein diet  on  growth, sexual  development  and metabolism in  female rats.
 Res. Commun.  Chem. Pathol.  Pharmacol.  9(4):723-738;  1974.   (As  cited bv
 U.S. EPA 1977)


 Dietz, D.D.;  McMillan, D.E.; Grant, L.D.; Kimmel, C.A.   Effects  of  lead
 on temporally-spaced responding in rats.  Drug Chem.  Toxicol. 1(4):401-
 419; 1978.


 Dingwall-Fordyce, J.; Lane, R.E.  A follow-up  study of  lead workers
 Br. J. Ind.  Mech. 30:313; 1963.   (As cited  by  U.S. EPA  1980)


 Dipaolo, J.A.; Nelson,  R.L.; Casto, B.C.  In vitro neoplastic transforma-
 tion of Syrian hamster cells by lead acetate and its  relevance to environ-
mental carcinogenesis.   Br.  J.  Cancer 38(3):452-455;   1978.
                                  5-43

-------
Donaldson, W.  The action of water on service pipes.  Journal AWWA 11:
649; 1924.   (As cited by Patterson and O'Brien 1979)

Earl, F.L.; Vish, T.J.  Teratogenicity of heavy metals.  Toxicity  of
heavy metals in the environment.  Part 2.  Oehme, F.W.  (ed.) New York,
NY:  Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1979:  617-639.

Elfving, D.C.; Haschek, W.M.; Stehn, R.A.; Bache, C.A.; Lisk, D.Jo
Heavy metal residues in plants cultivated on and in small mammals  indi-
genous to old orchard soils.  Arch. Environ. Health 33:95-99; 1978.

Emmerson, B.T.  Arthritis Rheum. 11:623-634; 1968.  (As cited by
Tsuchiya 1979)

Epstein, S.S.; Mantel, N.  Carcinogenicity of tetraethyllead.  Experienta
24:580-581; 1968.  (As cited by WHO 1977)

Eyden, B.P.; Maisin, J.R.; Mattelin, G.   Long-term effects of dietary
lead acetate on survival, body weight and seminal cytology in mice.
Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 19(3) :266-272; 1978.

Fahim, M.D.; £t _al.  Effects of subtoxic lead levels on pregnant women
in the state of Missouri.  Res. Commun.  Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 13:309;
1976.  (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980)

Fairhall, L.T.; Miller, J.W.  A study of the relative toxicity of  the
molecular components of lead arsenate.  Publ. Health Rep. 56:1610;  1941.
(As cited by IARC 1972)

Ferm, V.H.; Carpenter, S.J.   Exp. Mol. Pathol. 7:208; 1967.  (As cited
by Earl and Vish 1979)

Fine, B.P.; Jortner, B.S.; Ty, A.; Cause, D.; Lyons, M.  The effects of
body burdens of lead on the growing rat kidney.  Environ. Res. 19:215-
220; 1979.

Gale, T.  A variable emfaryotoxic response to lead in different strains
of hamsters.  Environ. Res.  17(3):325-333; 1978.

Gerber, G.; Maes, J.; Deroo, J.  Effect of dietary lead on placental
blood flow and on fetal uptake of alpha-amino isobutyrate.   Arch.
Toxicol. 41(2):125-131; 1978.

Gilani, S.H.  Congenital anomalies in lead poisoning.  Pathol. Microbiol.
39:85; 1973.  (As cited by Damstra 1977)

Gilsinn, J.F.  National Bureau of Standards Technical Note No. 746.
Gaithersburg, MD:  National Bureau of Standards; 1972.  (As cited by
Mahaffey 1978)
                                   5-44

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 I
 I
           Hayakawa, K.  Microdetermination and dynamic aspects of in vivo alkyl-
I           lead compounds in vivo.  Part II.  Studies on the dynamic aspects of
           alkyllead compounds in vivo.  Jap. J. Hyg. 26:526; 1972.  (As cited by
           GrandieAn anA Miale^n lOTO-v                                         "*
I
I
  Goldwater,  L.J.;  Hoover, A.W.  An international study of "normal" levels
  of lead in  blood  and urine.   Arch.  Environ. Health 15:60: 1967.  (As
  cited by Posner 1977)


  Goyer,  R.A.   Effect of toxic, chemical and environmental factors on the
  kidney.   Monogr.  Pathol.  20:202-217;  1979.

  Goyer,  R.A.;  Mushak,  P.   Lead toxicity laboratory aspects.   Adv. Mod
  Toxicol.  2:41-77;  1977.


  Goyer,  R.A.;  Rhyne,  B.C.   Pathological effects.   Int.  Rev.  Exp. Pathol
  12:1-77;  1973.  (As  cited by  U.S. EPA 1977)

  Goyer,  R.A.;  Tsuchiya, K.; Leonard, D.L.;  Kahyo,  H.  Aminoaciduria  in
  Japanese workers in  the  lead  and  cadmium industries.   Am. J.  din
  Pathol.  57:635-642;  1972.  (As cited  by WHO 1977)

  Grandjean, P.; Nielsen, T.  Organolead compounds:  environmental health
  aspects.  Residue Rev. 72:97-148; 1979.

  Granick, J.L.; Sassa,  S.; Kappas, A.  Some  biochemical and clinical
  aspects of lead intoxication.  Adv.  Clin. Chem. 20:287-339; 1978.

 Gray, L.E.;  Reiter, L.W.  Lead-induced developmental and behavioral
  changes in the mouse.  Presented at the 16th annual meeting society of
  toxicology,  Toronto, Canada;  March 1977.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977)

 Greathouse,  D.;  Craun, G.F.;  Worth,  D.  Epidemiological study of  the
 relationship between lead drinking water and blood lead levels
 Proceedings  of the 10th annual meeting on trace metals in the environ-
 ment.  Columbia,  MO:   University of Missouri Press; 1976:   305-309
 (As cited by Mahaffey 1978)


 Gross,  S.B.   Oral  and inhalation  lead  exposures in human  subjects.
 New York,  NY:  Lead  Industries Association, Inc.;  1979.  71  p.

 Hackett,  P.L.; Hess,  J.O.;  Sikov,  M.R.   Lead distribution and  effects
 during  development in the  rat.  Developmental toxicology  of  energy-
 related  pollutants.   U.S.  Department of  Energy, DOE 47; 1978:   505-519.


 im97-2lI;Bi977XP°SUre °f  hUmSnS  t0 lead>   ***' ReV' Pharmaco1'  Toxicol.


 Harding, F.  Metal contaminants in milk and  milk products:  lead
 Bull. Int. Dairy Fed.  105:27-32; 1978.
Grandjean and Nielsen 1979)
                                   5-45

-------
 Hernberg,  S.; et _al.   Nonrandom shortening of red cell survival times
 in men exposed to lead.   Environ.  Res. 1:247; 1967.  (As cited bv
 U.S.  EPA 1980)                                                  y

 Hilderbrand,  O.C.;  et al.   Effect  of lead acetate on reproduction.  Amer
 J.  Obst.  Gynecol.  115:1058; 1973.   (As cited by Damstra 1977)

 Hinton,  D.E.; Lipsky,  M.M.; Heatfield, B.M.; Trump, B.F.   Opposite
 effects  of  lead on  chemical carcinogenesis in kidney and liver of rats.
 Bull.  Environ.  Contam. Toxicol.  23(4-5) -.464-469; 1979.

 International Agency  for Research  on Cancer  (IARC).   IARC Monographs on
 the evaluation of the  carcinogenic risk of chemical to  man.   1:40-50-
 1972.


 Karalekas,  P.C.;  Craun,  G.F.;  Hammonds, A.F.;  Ryan,  C.R.; Worth,  D.J.
 Lead  and other trace materials in  drinking water in the Boston metropoli-
 tan area.   J.  New Engl.  Waterworks Assoc.  90:150-172; 1976.

 Karalekas,  P.C.; Ryan, C.R.; Larson,  C.D.; Taylor,  F.B.   Alternative
 methods for controlling  the corrosion of  lead  pipe.   Journal NEWWA
 92(2):159-178;  1978.

 Kazantzis,  G.;  Lilly, L.J.   Mutagenic and  carcinogenic  effects of  metals.
 Handbook on the toxicology  of  metals.   Friberg,  L. ;  Nordberg,  G.G.:
 Vouk, V.B.  (eds).  New York, NY:   Elsevier/North-Holland  Biomedical
 Press; 1979:   241-272.

 Kehoe, R.A.   The metabolism of lead  in  health  and disease.   The Harben
 Lectures, 1960.  J.  Rev.  Inst.  Publ.  Health Hyg. 24:81-96, 101-1?0
 129-143, 177-203; 1961.  (As cited by WHO 1977)                 "  '

 Kennedy, G.L.; Arnold, D.W.; Calandra,  J.C.  Teratogenic  evaluation  of
 lead compounds in mice and  rats.   Fd. Cosmet.  Toxicol. 13:629; 1975.
 (As cited by Grandjean and Nielsen 1979)

 Keppler, J.F.; .et .al.   Interlaboratory  evaluation of the  reliability of
 blood lead  analysis.  Am. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc. J.  31:412; 1970.   (As cited
by Kolbye et al. 1974)

Kerin, Z.   Tagliche gleiaufnahme mit der bauernkost aus  dem  emissiongebiet
 einer bleihutte.  Protectio vitae 71:22-23; 1972.  (As cited by WHO 1977)

 Kimmel, C.A.; Grant, L.D.;  Sloan, C.S.  Chronic  lead exposure:  assess-
ment of developmental toxicity.  Teratol. 13:27A; 1976.    (As cited by
U.S. EPA 1977)

Kimmel, C.A.;  Grant, L.D.;  Sloan, C.S.: Gladen, B.C.  Chronic  low-level
 lead toxicity in the rat.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 56:28-41; 1980.
                                   5-46

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
King,  B.C.  Maximum daily intake  of  lead without excessive body lead-
burden in  children.  Amer.  J. Dis. Child 122:337-340;  1971.


Kobayashi, N.; Okamoto,  T.   Effects  of  lead oxide on the induction of
lung  tumors in Syrian hamsters.   J.  Nat. Cancer Inst.  52(5):1605-1610;
1974.   (As cited by WHO  1977 and  U.S. EPA 1977)


Kolbye, A.C.; Mahaffey,  K.R.; Fiorino,  J.A.;  Cornellussen,  P.C.;
Jelinek, C.F.  Food exposures to  lead.   Environ.  Health Persp.  7(Exp.):
65-74;  1974.


Kotok,  D.  Development of children with elevated blood levels:  A con-
trolled study.  J.  Pediatr.  80:57; 1972.   (As cited  by U.S.  EPA 1980)


Krasovskii, G.N.; Vasukovich, L.Y.;  Chariev,  O.G.  Experimental study
of biological effects of  leads and aluminum following  oral administra-
tion.   Environ. Health Persp. 30:47-51;  1979.


Krigman, M.R.  Neuropathology of  heavy  metal  intoxication.   Environ.
Health  Persp. 26:117-120;  1978.


Lancranjan, I.; et  al.  Reproductive ability  of workmen occupationally
exposed to lead.  Arch. Environ.  Health 30:396;   1975.   (As  cited by
U.S. EPA 1980)


Landrigan, P.J.; Baker, E.L.  Increased lead  absorption with aremia
and slowed nerve conduction  in children near  a  lead  smelter.  Pediatrics
89:904; 1976.  (As  cited  in U.S.  EPA 1980)


Landrigan, P.J.; Gehlbach, S.H.;  Rosenblum, B.F.;  Shoults, J.M.;
Candelaria, R.M.; Barthel, W.F.;  Liddle,  J.A.;  Smrek,  A.L.;  Staehling,
N.W. ; Sanders, J.D.F.  Epidemic lead absorption near an ore  smelter:
The role of particulate lead.  New Engl.  J. Med.  292:123-129; 1975.
(As cited by U.S.  EPA 1977)


Lane, R.E.  The care of the lead worker.  Br. J.  Ind.  Med. 6:1243; 1949.
(As cited by U.S.  EPA 1980)


Lansdown, R.G.; .et .al.  Blood-lead levels, behavior and  intelligence.
A population study.  Lancet 1:1166;  1974.   (As  cited by  U.S. EPA  1980)


Laporte, R.E.; Talbott, E.E.  Effects of  low  levels of  lead exposure  on
cognitive function:  A review.   Arch. Environ. Health  33(5):236-239;
1978.


Leonard, A.;  Linden, G.; Gerber, G.B.   International symposium on
environmental health aspects (lead);  1972 October  2-6, Amsterdam,   the
Netherlands,  Euratom Publications; 1973:  303-309.   (As  cited by
Kazantzis  and Lilly 1979)
                                 5-47

-------
Lepow, M.L.; Bruckman, L.; Rubino,  R.A.;  Markowitz,  S.;  Gillette,  M.;
Kapish, J.  Role  of airborne  lead  in  increased body  burden of lead in
Hartford children.  Environ.  Health Persp.  7(Exp.):99-102; 1974.

Levander, O.A.  Lead  toxicity and  nutritional  deficiencies.   Environ.
Health Persp.  29:115-125; 1979.

Lilis, R.; et  al.  Lead effects among secondary lead smelter workers
with blood levels below 80 yg/1100  ml.  Arch.  Environ. Health,  p.  256;
1977.  (As cited by U.S. EPA  1980).

Lilis, R.; Valciukas, J.; Fischbein,  A.;  Andrews,  G.;  Selikoff,  I.J.;
Blumberg, W.   Renal function  impairment in  secondary lead  smelter
workers; correlations with zinc protoporphyrin and blood lead levels.
J. Environ. Path. Toxicol. 2:1447-1474; 1979.

Lin-Fu, J.S.   In:  Proceedings of  the international  conference  on  heavy
metals in the  environment, Toronto, 27-31 October  1975.  Electric  Power
Research Institute (Calif.),  EPA,  Institute for Environmental Studies
(University of Toronto), International Nickel  Company  of Canada Ltd.,
National Institute of Occupational  Safety and  Health (Cincinnati),
National Research Council of  Canada,  SCOPE, WHO; 1976.   (As  cited by
Tsuchiya 1979)

Mahaffey, K.R.  Dietary lead  intake of children living in  Washington, DC.
Unpublished data.  [1976].  (As cited by  Mahaffey  1978)

Mahaffey, K.R.  Quantities of lead  producing health  effects  in  humans:
_sources and bioavailability.   Environ. Health  Persp.  19:285-295; 1977.

Mahaffey, K.R.  Environmental Exposure to lead.  Nriagu, J.D. ed.   The
biogeochemistry of lead in the environment.  New York, NY:   Elsevier/
North-Holland  Biomedical Press; 1978:  Chapter 11, 1-36.

Maisin, J.R.;  Jade, J.M.; Lambiet-Collier,  M.   Progress  report  on
morphological  studies of the  toxic  effects  of  lead on  the  reproductive
organs and the embryos.  Economic Community of Europe  Contract  No.
080-74-7, Env. B.; Belgium, 1975.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977).

Mao, P.; Molnar, J.J.  The fine structure and  histochemistry of lead-
induced renal  tumors in rats.  Amer.  J. Path.  50:571;  1967.   (As cited
by IARC 1972)

McCabe, E.B.  Age and sensitivity to  lead toxicity:  a review.  Environ.
Health Persp.  29:29-33; 1979.

McClain, R.M.; Becker, B.A.   Teratogenicity, fetal toxicity  and placental
transfer of lead nitrate in rats.   Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  31:72-82;
1975>
                                    5-48

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 McFeatters, A.  Lead.  The Columbus Citizen-Journal 17(56,  Sect.  2):11;
 1976.  (As cited by Bell _et al. 1979)


 McLaughlin, M.; Stopps, G.J.  Smoking and lead.  Arch. Environ. Health
 26:131; 1973.  (As cited by Posner 1977)


 McLaughlin, J.; Marliac, J.P.; Verrett, M.J.; _et _al.  Toxicol. Appl.
 Pharmacol.  5:760-711;  1963.   (As cited by Rosen and Sorell 1978)


 McNeil, J.L.; £t _al.   Evaluation of long-term effects of elevated blood
 lead concentrations in asymptomatic children.   Arhiv.  Rig. Rada. Toksikol.
 14:97;  1975.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980)


 Mitchell,  D.G.; Aldous, K.M.  Lead content of foodstuffs.  Environ.
 Health  Persp. 7(Exp.):59-64; 1974.


 Momcilovic, B.  The effect of  maternal dose or lead retention in suckling
 rats.  Arch.  Environ.  Health 33(3):115-117;  1978.


 Momcilovic, B.  Lead  metabolism in lactation.   Experientia 35(4):517-518•
 1979.


 Moore,  M.R.  Diet and lead toxicity.   Proc.  Nutr. Soc. 38:243-250; 1979.
 Moore,  M.R.;  Meredith,  P.A.;  Campbell,  B.C.; Goldberg, A.; Pocock, S.J.
 Contribution  of lead in drinking water  to blood-lead.   Lancet 11(8039):
 661-662;  1977.


 Moore,  M.R.;  Meredith,  P.A.   The carcinogenicity of lead.   Arch. Toxicol.
 42(2):87-94;  1979.


 Moore,  M.R.;  Meredith,  P.A.;  Watson,  W.S.;  Sumner,  D.J.;  Taylor, M.K.;
 Goldberg, A.  The percutaneous  absorption of lead-203  in  humans from
 cosmetic  preparations containing lead acetate,  as  assessed by whole-body
 counting  and  other  techniques.   Fd. Cosmet.  Toxicol. 18:399-405; 1980.


 Muir, W.; Bridbord,  K.   Lead  and women,  a unique problem?   Review of
 lead  toxicity.   Proceedings conference  on women and the workplace;  1976
 June  17-19.   Soc. Occup. Environ. Health pp.  227-231;  1977.


 Muro, L.A.; Goyer, J.R.A.  Arch.  Pathol.  87:660-663; 1969.   (As cited by
 Kazantzis and Lilly  1979).


 Mykkanen, H.M.;  Dickerson, J.W.T.; Lancaster, M.   Strain differences in
 lead  intoxication in rats.  Toxicol.  Appl. Pharmacol.  52:414-421;  1980.


National Research Council (NRC); 1980.   (As cited in Food Chem. News.
pp. 53-56; March 24, 1980).
                                   5-49

-------
Needleman, H.L. ed.  Low  level  lead  exposure,   the clinical implications
of  current research.  New York, NY:   Raven Press;  1980.

Needleman, H.L.; Davidson,  I.;  Sewell,  E.M. ;  Shapiro,  D.M.   New Engl.
J.  Med. 290:245-248; 1974.   (As cited by  Rosen and Sorell 1978)

Needleman, H.L. ; Gunnoe,  C. ; Leviton, A. ;  Reed,  R. ;  Peresie,  H. ;
Maher, C. ; Barrett, P.  Deficits  in  psychologic  and  classroom perfor-
mance of  children with elevated dentine lead  levels.   New Engl. J.  Med.,
300:689-695; 1979.
Nelson, W.C.; ££. jj..  Mortality among orchard workers  exposed to lead
arsenate spray:  a cohort study.  J. Chron. Dis.  26:105;  1973.   (As
cited by U.S. EPA 1980)

Neshkov, N.S.  Effects of chronic poisoning with  ethylated  gasoline  on
spermatogenesis and sexual function in males.  Gig. Truda i Prof.  Zabol.
15:45; 1971.  (As cited by Grandjean and Nielsen  1979)

Nielsen, T. ; et. al..  Unpublished results; 1979.   (As cited  by Grandjean
and Nielsen 1979)

Nogaki, K.  On action of lead on body of lead refinery workers:   parti-
cularly conception, pregnancy and parturition in  case of  females  and
their newborn.  Excerp. Med. (XVII) 4:2176; 1958.   (As cited  by U.S.  EPA
1977)

Nordman, C.H. ; Hernberg, S.  Blood lead levels and erythrocyte d-amino
levulinic acid dehydratase activity of selected population  groups  in
Helsinki.  Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 1:210-232; 1975.   (As  cited
by WHO 1977)

Nriagu, J. ed.  The biogeochemistry of lead in the environment.  New
York, NY:  Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press; 1978.

Nriagu, J. ed.  The biogechemistry of lead in the environment.  Part  B.
Biological effects.  New York,  NY:  Elsevier/North-Holland  Biomedical
Press; 1978.

Obe, G. ; Beek, B. ;  Dudin, G.  Some experiments on the action  of lead
acetate on human leukocytes in vitro.   Mutat.  Res. 29:283;  1975.

O'Brien, J.  Lead in Boston water:  its cause and prevention.  Journal
NEWWA 90:173-180; 1976.

Odenbro, A.; Kihlstrom, J.E.  Frequency of pregnancy and ova  implantation
in triethyl lead-treated mice.   Toxicol.  Appl Pharmacol. 39:359; 1977.
(As cited by Grandjean and Nielsen 1979)

O'Riordan, M.L.;  Evans, H.J.  Absence of significant chromosome damage
in males occupationally exposed to lead.   Nature 247:50-53; 1974.  (As
cited by WHO 1977)

                                  5-50

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 Oyasu, R.; Battifora, H.A.; Clasen, R.A.; McDonald, J.H.; Mass, G.M.
 Induction of cerebral gliomas in rats with dietary lead  subacetate  and
 2-acetylaminofluorene.  Cancer Res. 30:1248; 1970.  (As  cited by  IARC
 1972)


 Palmisano, P.A.; Sneed, R.C.; Cassady, G.  Untaxed whiskey and fetal
 lead exposure.  J. Pediatr. 75:869; 1969.  (As cited by  WHO 1977)


 Panova, Z.  Early changes in the ovarian function of women in occupa-
 tional contact with inorganic lead.  Works United Res. Inst. Hyg. Ind.
 Saf. 23:161-166; 1972.  (As cited by WHO 1977)


 Patterson, J.W.; O'Brien, J.E.   Control of lead corrosion.  Journal
 AWWA 71 (5):264-271; 1979.


 Payne, B.J.;  Saunders, L.Z.  Heavy metal nephropathy of  rodents.   Vet.
 Path. 15(5):51-86; 1978.


 Perino, J.;  Ernhart, C.B.  The relation of subclinical lead level to
 cognitive and sensorimotor impairment in black preschoolers.  J.  Learn.
 Dis. 7:26;  1974.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980)


 Posner,  H.S.   Indexes of  potential  lead  hazard.   Environ. Health  Persp.
 19:261-284; 1977.


 Pueschel,  S.M.;  Kopitao,  L.;  Schwachman,  H.   A  screening  and follow  up
 study of  children  with an increased lead  burden.   J. Am.  Med. Assoc.
 333:462-466;  1972.   (As cited by  WHO 1977)


 Rabinowitz, M.B.   Lead contamination of  the biosphere  by  human activity,
 Los  Angeles,  CA:   University of California at Los  Angeles; 1974.   Dis-
 sertation.  (As  cited  by  U.S. EPA 1977)


 Rabinowitz, M.B.;  Wetherill, G.W.;  Kopple, J.D.  Lead metabolism in  the
 normal human:   stable  isotope studies.  Science 182:725-772; 1973.
 (As  cited by WHO 1977)


 Rabinowitz, M.B.; Wetherill, G.W.;  Kopple, J.D.  Studies  of human  lead
 metabolism by use  of stable isotope  tracers.  Environ. Health Persp.
 Exp.  7:145-166; 1974.   (As cited by  WHO 1977)


 Rabinowitz, M.B.; Wetherill, G.W.;  Kopple, J.D.  Kinetic  analysis  of
 lead metabolism in healthy humans.   J. Clin.  Invest. 58:260; 1976.   (As
 cited by Posner 1977)


 Ramel, C.  The effect of metal compounds on chromosome segregation.
Mutat. Res. 21:45; 1973.  (As cited by Grandjean and Nielsen 1979)


Reiter, L.W.;  Anderson, G.E.; Laskey, J.L.; Cahill, D.F.  Developmental
and behavioral changes in the rat during chronic exposure to lead.
Environ. Health Persp. 12:119-123; 1975.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977)
                                 5-51

-------
 Repko,  J.D.;  Corum,  C.R.   Critical review and evaluation of the neuro-
 logical and behavioral  sequelae  of inorganic lead absorption.   CRC Grit
 Rev.  Toxicol.  6(2) :135-187;  1979.

 Roberts,  T.M. ;  Hutchinson, T.C. ;  Paciga,  J. ; Chattopadhyay, A.;
 Jervis,  R.E. ;  Van  Loon, J. ;  Parkinson,  D.K.   Lead contamination around
 secondary smelters:   estimation  of dispersal and  accumulation  bv humans.
 Science 186(4169) : 1120-1123;  1974.

 Robinson,  M.J. ; Karpinski, F.E.,  Jr.; Brieger,  H.   The  concentration of
 lead  in plasma, whole blood  and  erythrocytes of infants and children.
 Pediatrics 21:793; 1958.   (As cited by  Posner 1977)

 Robinson,  T.R.  20-year mortality  of tetraethyl lead workers.   J.  Occup.
 Med.  16:601;  1974.   (As cited by Grandjean and  Nielsen  1979)

 Roels,  H.A. ;  Buchet,  J.P. ; Bernard, A.; Hubermont,  G. ;  Lauwerys ,  R.R. ;
 Masson, P.  Investigations of factors influencing  exposure  and response
 to lead,  mercury, and cadmium in man and  animals.   Env.  Health Persp .
 25:91-96;  1978.

 Rosen,  J.F.;  Sorell, M.  The metabolism and  subclinical effects of  lead
 in children.   The biogeochemistry  of lead  in the environment,  Part  b.
 Biological effects.  Nriagu, J.D.  ed.   New York, NY:  Elsevier/North-
 Holland Biomedical Press; 1978:  151-172,

 Sandhu, S.S.;  Warren, W. J. ; Nelson, P.  Inorganic  contaminants  in rural
 drinking waters.  Journal AWWA 69(4) :219-222; 1977.

 Sandstead, H.H.; Michalakis , A.M.; Temple, T.E.  Lead intoxication.  Its
 effect on the renin aldosterone response to  sodium deprivation.  Arch.
 Environ. Health 20:356-363; 1970.   (As  cited by Mahaffey 1978)

 Schmid, E. ; Bauchinger, M. ; Pietruck, S. ; Han, G.  Die cytogenetische
wirkung von Blei in menschlichen peripheren  lymphocyten ±n vitro and ±n
vivo*   Mutat.  Res.  16:401-406; 1972.  (As cited by U.S.  EPA 1977)
Schwanitz, G. ; Lehnert, G. ; Gebhart, E.  Desch. Med. Wochenschr 95:1636-
1641; 1970.  (As cited by Kazant2is and Lilly 1979)

Settle, D. ; Patterson, C.  Lead in albacore:  guide to lead pollution
in Americans.  Science 207:1167-1176; 1980.

Shih, T.-M. ; Hanin, I.  Chronic lead exposure in immature animals:  neuro-
chemical correlates.  Life Sci. 23(9) :877-888; 1978.

Six, K.M. ; Goyer, R.A.  The influence of iron deficiency on tissue content
and toxicity of ingested lead in the rat.  J. Lab. Clin. Med. 79:128-136;
1972.  (As cited by WHO 1977)
                                   5-52

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 Stewart, R.A.;  Skeberdis,  J.  Lead  intake  of  United  States infants.
 Gerber Research Center, Fremont, Michigan.  Unpublished data;  1975.
 (As  cited by Mahaffey  1978)


 Taylor, F.B.  Overview of  New England water supply problems.   J.  N.E.
 Water Works Assoc.  91(2):165-174; 1977.


 Tepper, L.B.  Arch. Environ. Health 7:76-85;  1963.   (As cited  by  Tsuchiya
 1979)


 Tepper, L.B.; King, B.C.   Maximal daily  intake  of lead  without excessive
 body lead-burden in children.  Am.  J. Dis. Child. 122:337; 1971.   (As
 cited by Mahaffey 1978)


 Tepper, L.B.; Levin, L.S.  A survey of air and  population  lead levels  in
 selected American communities.  Final report.   Seven cities study.
 Cincinnati, OH:   University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine; 1972.
 (As  cited by Bell .et al. 1979)


 Tola, S.; Hernberg, S.; Asp, S.; Nikkanen, J.   Parameters  indicative of
 absorption and  biological  effect in new  lead  exposure.   A  prospective
 study.  Brit. J.  Ind.  Med. 30:134-141; 1973.   (As cited by WHO 1977)


 Tsuchiya, K.  Lead.  Friberg, L.; Nordberg, G.F.; Vouk, V.B. eds.
 Handbook on the toxicology of metals.  New York, NY:  Elsevier/North-
 Holland Biomedical  Press;  1979:  451-484.


 U.S. Department of  Health, Education and Welfare  (U.S.  DHEW).   Community
 water supply study.  Analysis of national  survey findings. Washington,
 DC:  Bureau of  Water Hygiene, Environmental Health Service:  1970.  Ill p.


 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Air quality  criteria
 for  lead.  Washington, DC:  Office  of Research  and Development, U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency; 1977.   Available from  NTIS; PB 28 0411.


 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Ambient  water quality
 criteria for lead.  Report No. EPA  440/5-80-057.  Washington,  DC:
 Criteria and Standards Division, Office  of Water Regulations and
 Standards; 1980.


 Van  Esch, G.J.; Van Gendersen, H.; Wink, H.H.   The induction of renal
 tumors by feeding of basic lead acetate  to rats.  Brit.  J. Cancer 16:289-
 1962.  (As cited  by LARC 1972)


Van  Esch, G.J.; Kroes, R.  The induction of renal tumors by feeding  basic
 lead acetate to mice and hamsters.   Brit. J.  Cancer 23:765; 1969.   (As
 cited by LARC 1972)


Vurdelja, N.; Farago,  F.; Nikolie,  V.;  Vuckovic, S.    Clinical  experiences
with intoxications of fuel containing lead-tetraethyl.  Folia  Facultatis
Medical Univ.  Comenianae 5:133;  1967.  (As cited by Grandjean  and Nielsen
1979)


                                  5-53

-------
Walker, B.  Lead content of milk  in  infant  formula.   J.  Food Protection
43(3):178-179; 1980.

Walter, S.D.; Yankel, A.J.; von Lindern,  I.H.   Age-specific risk factors
for lead absorption in children.  Arch. Environ.  Health  35(l):53-58;  1980.

Weeden, R.P.; _et al.  Occupational lead nephropathy.  Am.  J.  Med.  59:630;
1975.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980)

Wibberley, D.J.; et al.  Lead levels in human placentas  from normal and
malformed births.  J. Med.-Genetics  14:339; 1977.   (As cited by  U.S.  EPA
1980)

Wigle, D.T.; Charlebois, E.J.  Electric kettles as a  source of human
lead exposure.  Arch. Environ. Health 33:72-78; 1978.

World Health Organization  (WHO).  Environmental health criteria  3:  lead.
New York,  NY:   The World Health Organization; 1977.   160 p.

Zawirska,  B.;  Medras, K.  Tumours and disorders of the porphyrin metabo-
lism in rats with chronic experimental lead poisoning. I. Morphologic
studies.  Zbl. allg. Path. path. Anat. 111:1; 1968.   (As cited by  IARC
1972)

Zielhuis,  R.L.  Int. Arch. Occup.  Environ. Health 35:1-18,  19-35;  1975.
(As cited in Tsuchiya 1979)

Zielhuis,  R.L.; Wibowo, A.A.E.  Review paper:  susceptibility of adult
females to lead:   effects on reproductive function in females and males.
2nd international workshop on permissible limits for occupational  exposure
to lead.  In press; 1977.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977)

Zollinger,  H.U.  Durch chronische bleivergiftung erzeugte nierenadenome
und carcinoma bei ratten und ihre beziehungen zu den entsprechenden
neubildung des menschen.  Virchow Arch.  323:694-710; 1953.   (As cited
by Moore and Meredith 1979)
                                  5-54

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
                   6.0  BIOTIC EFFECTS AND EXPOSURE
6.1  EFFECTS ON BIOTA

6.1.1  Introduction

     This section provides information on the exposure levels of lead
that disrupt the normal behavior and metabolic processes in aquatic and
terrestrial organisms.  Data are based on the laboratory studies from
the available literature.  In addition to its widespread publicity with
regard to human health effects, lead has been the focus of extensive
research on plant and animal toxicosis.  The U.S. EPA (1980) has reviewed
this data,  thus only brief discussions will be contained here.

     In aquatic bioassays, a certain amount of variability is expected,
owing to several factors.  Differences in test type, for example, static,
or continuous flow-through tests, may influence  the results.  In addition,
water parameters, such as hardness and the presence of other chemicals,
are known to influence the toxicity of lead to various aquatic organisms,
as well as the form of lead (inorganic or organic) used.  Thus, variations
in these parameters between experiments could yield varying results.
Other factors include the duration of exposure and species and develop-
mental stage of the test organisms.  Because some species and stages may
be more sensitive to lead than others, it is not always appropriate to
compare the results of different studies.

6.1.2  Freshwater Organisms

6.1.2.1  Chronic and Sublethal Effects

     When chronically exposed to low levels, aquatic biota may become
acclimated to a toxic substance, or they may exhibit adverse effects,
such as decreased respiration,  lack of responsiveness to stimulation,
growth inhibition, and malformation.  Even if aquatic fauna are not
killed by long-term exposure to lead, the vigor and diversity of local
populations may still be endangered.

     Data on the sublethal effects of lead on freshwater fish are summar-
ized in Table 6-1.  The lowest concentration at which effects were
reported was 7.6 ug/1 (hardness 28 mg/1), which caused developmental
irregularities in rainbow trout fingerlings in a chronic exposure test
(Davies et^ a!L. 1976).  Other sublethal effects have been noted at lead
concentrations as high as 110 mg/1, and include fin erosion, tail black-
ening, loss of equilibrium, poor resorption of yolk in fry, and growth
inhibition.  The U.S. EPA (1980) reported chronic values ranging from
19 yg/1 (hardness 28 mg/1) for the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) to
174 yg/1 (hardness 38 mg/1) for the whtie sucker (Catastomus commersoni).
These values were primarily based on effects observed in early life stages,
                                  6-1

-------
TAIU.E 6-1.   SIIKI.ICTIIAL KKFECTS OF  I.KAI) ON KKESllUATtiK  K1SII
Species
Kalnbow trout, fingerling
(Salmo galrdnerl)
Zebrafish, eggs
(Brachydanlo rerio)
Goldfish
(Ca raas jus auratus)
Ox
to
Halnbow trout, yearling
(Salmo gatrdnerl)
Brook trout
(Salvellnus fontfnalis)
Chinook salmon
(Oncorhynchus tshawytacha)
Concentration
(mg/1)
0.0076-0.064
0.036-0.072
0.070
6.6
110
0.12
2.4
0.134
10
Compound

Pb (N03)2
Pb (N03)2
Pb (NOp.,
Pb (N03)2
Pb (N03)2
Pb (N03)2
Pb (N03)2
Experimental
Condi t Ions

Life-cycle, 28 &
353 mg/1 hardness
Embryo-larval, 26°
1.6 mg/1 alkalinity
static
pll 6.0-6.9, 23°
soft water
hard water
Flow- through 32 wk,
135 mg/1 hardness,
pll 7.7, 11°
44 mg/1 hardness
Static, 4-6 hour, 11°
pll 7.2, 0-17 mg/1 hard
Effects
I.ordoticollosls, paralysis,
muscular atrophy,
degeneration of caudal fin,
blackening of tall
Poor resorptlon of yolk In
fry, erosion of tall & fin,
spinal curvature, apparent
eplthellomas
Significant Impairment ot
conditioned response
7-day LC50
7-day l.C50
Increase In number of
erythrocytes, 30% Incidence
of black tails
21-day LC50
Reduced growth
Loss of equilibrium
Reference

Uavies et al.
(1976)"
Ozoh (1979a)
Uelr and Nine
(1970)
Hudson et al.
(1978)
Christensen
(1975)
MacPhee and
Reulle (1969)

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
     The  range  of  sublethal  and  chronic  effect  concentrations for inver-
 tebrates  seems  considerably  narrower  than  for fish  (see Table 6-2),
 although  this could  be  a  function  of  the particular species  tested.   The
 isopod, Asellus meridianus,  exhibited reduced growth rates  in 0.1 mg/1
 lead over a period of 20  days  (Brown  1976).  The  only other  reported
 sublethal effect was reduced respiration in  the sludgeworm,  which was
 attributed to the  mucous-metal complex that  formed  on the body wall  and
 blocked the exchange of oxygen and carbon  dioxide (Whitley 1968).  The
 U.S. EPA  (1980) reported  chronic values  ranging from 12 ug/1 to 128  ug/1
 for Daphnia maana  at water hardness of 52-151 mg/1  CaC03-  The chronic
 value  for the snail  (Lymnea  palustris) was 25 ug/1  at 139 mg/1 hardness.
 These  were based on  life  cycle or  partial  life  cycle tests.

 6.1.2.2   Acute Toxicity

     Acute toxicity  is  defined as  toxicant-induced  mortality over a
 short  period, generally within 96  hours.  Although  fish in natural water-
 ways are  more likely to be exposed to  lower  concentrations that might
 result in chronic  or sublethal effects,  industrial  discharges  and spills
 can temporarily result  in lead levels  high enough to cause fish kills.

     Some of the acute  toxicity data  for freshwater  fauna are  summarized
 in Table  6-3.  The lowest LC5Q value  reported in  the literature for  a
 freshwater fish was 0.3 mg/1 for the  three-spined stickleback  (Jones
 1938).  With respect to the  intra- and interspecies  differences, the
 LC5Q values given were  derived under a variety  of conditions.   Such
 factors as exposure period (varying between  24  and  96 hours),  age of  test
 organisms, differences  in certain water parameters,  and bioassay type
 (static or flow-through) may account for some of  the variation in reported
 LC5Q concentrations.   For example, values for the bluegill sunfish alone
varied from 23.8 mg/1 to 442 mg/1; apparently the variation was largely
 because of the differences in water hardness.   Factors  contributing  to
 variability in lead toxicity and fish sensitivity are discussed in greater
 detail in  Section 6.1.4.

     The  observed LC5QS for freshwater invertebrates range from 0.124 mg/1
 for the scud to 71.0 mg/1 for the snail.   The data are insufficient to
 determine  the relationship between water hardness and lead toxicity for
 the species studied.

     Other freshwater toxicity data observed mortality in adult leopard
 frogs  (Rana pipiens)  after a 30-day exposure to  100 Ug/1 lead nitrate
 (Kaplan et al.  1967).

 6.1.2.3  Effects on Microflora

     The toxic effects  of lead have been observed in a variety of alga,
diatom, and desmid species.   Effects  similar to  those causing sublethal
effects in fish have  been observed in short-term bioassays at concentra-
tions ranging from 50 ug/1 to 28.0 mg/1 (U.S. EPA  1980).
                                   6-3

-------
  TABLE 6-2.   CIIKONIC AND SWILKTIIAL EKKECTS OK LEAD ON PKESHWATKK  INVERTEBRATES

Species
Daplmia Ma^na
Snail
( Lymnea palustrla)
Isopod
(Asellus mcridlanus)

Daphnia niagna
Daphnia magna
Daphnia magna
ON
Crayfish
(Orconectes virilia)
Sludgeworms
(Tubifex tub if ex)
(Limnodrlius hof fmelsteri)

Mayfly
(Ephemcrella grandla)

Concentration Compound
(rag/1)
0.012 Pb(N03)2

0.025 Pb(N03)2
0.1 ?
0.119 l'b(NOj)
0.128 Pb(N03)2
0.3 ?
0.5-2.0 PbAc
1.0- >60 Pb (N03)


3.5 I
Experimental
Conditions
52 mg/1 hardness, life cycle

139 mg/1 hardness, life cycle
25 mg/l hardness, static
20 diws, |.H 7.7
102 mg/1 hardness, life
151 nig/l hardness, life cycle
43 mg/1 hardness
21 days exposure
40 days exposure
pll 6.5-9.5


50 mg/1 hardness
14 days, nil 7. 1

Effects
Chronic value

Chronic value
Reduced growth
Chronic value
Chronic value
LC50
02 consumption slightly
reduced compared w/controls
Decrease In respiration rate


'•C50

Reference
U.S. EPA (1980)

U.S. EPA (1980)
Brown (1976)
U.S. EPA (1980)
U.S. EPA (1980)
Biesinger and
Christensen 91972)
Anderson (1978)
Will t ley (|y6H),
Whit Icy and Sikora
(1970)
Nehriny (1976)
   (Ephemerella grandls)

Stonefly
   (Pteronarcys californica)

Caddisfly
   (Hydropsyche bettenl)

Insect
   (Acroneuria lycorias)
 16.0
>19.2
 32.0
 hf.  n
                    PbSO,
44 rag/1  hardness
  7 days,  static

50 mg/1  hardness
14 days  exposure

44 rng/1  hardness
  7 days, static
44 mg/1 hardness
14 days, static
                                                                  l'C
                                                                    50
                                                                  LC
                                                                    50
                                                                  LC
                                                                    50
Warnick and  Bull
(1969)

Nehriii,; (1976)
Warnick and Bell
(1969)
                                                                                                                                     Warnick  and Bell
                                                                                                                                     (1969)

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
         TABLE  6-3.   ACUTE TOXICITY (LC5Q)  OF LEAD TO FRESHWATER FAUNA
             Species
 Concentration
    Ranee
Range of Hardness
Three-spined stickeback (Gasterosteus
aculeatus)
Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)
Fathead minnow (Pimephales protnelas)
Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis)
Guppy (Poecilia reticulata)
Bluegill sunf ish (Lepomis macrochirus)
Goldfish (Carassius auratus)
Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis)
Red shiner (Notropis lutrensis)
(mg/1)
0.3a
1.17-542.0
2.4 -482.0
4.1
20.6
23.8-442.0
31.5
240.0
630.0
(mg/1 as CaC03)
9
28-353
20-360
44
20
20-360
20
20
9
          Invertebrates


Scud (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus)

Isopod (Asellus meridianus)

Daphnia magna

Daphnia hyalina

Copepod (Eudiaptomus padanus)

Copepod (Cyclops abyssorum)

Snail (Lymnaea emarginata)

Sludgeworm (Tub ifex tubifex)

Rotifer (Philodina acuticornis)

Snail (Goniobasis livescens)
  0.124°

  0.28

0.45-1.91

  0.60

  4.0

  5.5

 14.0

27.5-49.0

 40.8

 71.0
 Jones (1938).


'Spehar et al. (1978).
Source:  U.S.  EPA (1980), except as otherwise noted.
                                   6-5
     44-48

       25

     45-152

       66

       66

       66

      154

       ?

       25

      154

-------
  6.1.3  Marine Organisms
      Information on lead toxicosis in marine  finfish  is  limited  to  two
  Mof ' aUd Tly °nS aCUte toxiclty st^y was available.  Weis  and Weis
  (1976) exposed mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) with partially  amputated
 caudal fins to various lead nitrate solutions to determine the effect of
 lead on fin regeneration.  A concentration of 0.1 mg/1 was found  to
 stimulate fin growth, while 1.0 mg/1 lead significantly  inhibited
 regeneration.
              and co-workers (1926) observed growth inhibition in juvenile
 plaice (Pleuronectes £latessa) exposed to 2 mg/1 colloidal lead as Pb*
 So!2!   ,TlT\ 197?) rep°rted a 96-hour LC50 of 315 mg/1 for the mummi-
 chog in static bioassays.

Suble     Sfl6fd t°XfCityJ^ marinS invert^rates are much more abundant
                  ln    6
 rate  whh   v  Kn    6         larVal devel°P™^ and reduced growth
                  beSn observed in concentrations as low as 50 u./i in the
         TP       PanuP6US  arSii)  (BeniJ^-daus and Benijts 1975)
 with     ?5° ValUSS haVe beSn rep°rted in the "nge of 1.0-30.0 m*/l
      Information on acute  toxicity is  summarized in Table 6-4   The
 lowest  reported  LC50 is  0.72  mg/1 for  the  hardshell clam larvae.

 6o1*4  Factors Affecting the  Aquatic Toxicity  of Lead

      Numerous variables  in a  natural aquatic environment influence  the
 availability and toxicity  of  lead to biota.  The hardness of  the water
 dissolved solids, . oxygen content, pH, and  interactions between heavy   '
 metals  modify the toxicity of lead  to varying  degrees.

      Among these parameters, water  hardness appears  to be the most
 significant.  The negative  correlation between lead  toxicity and hard-
 ness  has been confirmed  in  numerous laboratory studies.   The most illus-
 trative example  of  this  relationship is found in the results of a study
 by Pickering and Henderson  (1966).  In static bioassays  on fathead minnows
 in water with either 20 mg/1 or 360 mg/1 hardness, the authors calculated
 96-hour LC50s of  5.58 mg/1  and 482.0 mg/1  lead,  respectively.  Similar
 results were obtained in experiments with  the bluegill.   Davies et al.
 (1976) found that the 96-hour LCso for rainbow trout varied by a factor
 of >400 in a water hardness range of 28-353 mg/1; however, tests in soft
water were flow- through,  while those in hard water were static.  Miller
and Landesman (1978) reported that magnesium ions (component  of
water hardness)  have suppressive effects on the  toxicity of lead to frog
 (Xenopus sp.)  embryos.

     The presence of other dissolved solids may also alter the toxicity
of lead to aquatic organisms.   Wong et  al.  (1978) recommend the use of
                                   6-6

-------
1
1

1

1
•
1
1



1

1

1





1
1



1
•
1
1
1
1


TABLE 6-4. ACUTE TOXICITY (LC50) OF LEAD


Sjaecies ^50 Concentration
(mg/1)
Hard-shell clam, larvae 0.72-0.80
(Mercenaria mercenaria)
Polychaete, trochophore 1.2
(Capltella cap it at a)
Eastern oyster, larvae 2.2 - 3.6
(Crassostrea virginica)

Isopod 10a
(Jaera albifrons)

Isopod 10a
(Jaera nordmanni)

Softshell clam 27.0
(Mya arenaria)
K
Prawn 375
(Pandalus montagui)
K
Cockle >500
(Cardium edule)


aJones (1975).
b
Portmann and Wilson (1971) .

Source: U.S. EPA (1980), except as otherwise



6-7


TO MARINE INVERTEBRATES

Experimental
Conditions


Static, nominal,
48 hours
Static, nominal,
96 hours
Static, nominal,
48 hours
Static, 24 hours,
5°C, 1% seawater
Static, 36 hours,
5°C, 1% seawater
Static, nominal, 96 hours,
salinity 30° /oo, pH 7.95
Static, renewal,
48 hours, 15° C

Static, renewal,
48 hours, 15 °C






noted.





-------
phosphate-free conditions in laboratory bioassays on algae, because
phosphates also decrease lead toxicity.  The assessment of Dorfman  (1977)
on the influence of varying salinity on lead toxicity to the mummichog
proved inconclusive.

     In natural waters, lead occurs in free ionic forms, in complexed
forms with organic and inorganic molecules, and in association with
particulate matter  (Wong j2t_ al^. 1978) (see Section 4.3).  The consensus
of the literature surveyed is that the free ion, with the exception of
certain organolead compounds, is the form of lead most often associated
with toxicity.  Davies et al. (1976) found that when lead was added to
hard water, precipitates of lead salts were formed, probably as carbon-
ates and hydroxides.  Such precipitates (in addition to chelates, organic
complexes, and lead absorbed to particulates) are apparently less avail-
able to aquatic organisms for uptake and metabolism.  Barber and Ryther
(1969) found that the addition of the chelating agent ethylenediamine-
tetraacetic acid (EDTA) decreased or completely masked lead toxicity.
On the other hand, small amounts of lead may be methylated to more avail-
able forms in sediments, the amounts produced are probably too small to
contribute significantly to overall aquatic lead toxicity.

      In  the case of water hardness, Zitco  (1976) has suggested another
mechanism for lead  toxicity suppression.  Base metals, such as calcium
or magnesium, might compete with heavy metals, such as lead, for active
sites on  the surface membranes of organisms.  In hard water, the concen-
trations  of these metals would be greater than lead, and any such sites
would quickly be saturated, and hence unavailable to lead.  Matthiesson
and Brafield  (1977) have suggested  that the base metals may protect the
biochemical processes with which zinc interferes; this hypothesis could
also be applied to  lead, assuming certain similar characteristics between
the two heavy metals.

     Dissolved oxygen level and pH are two parameters that are normally
controlled in laboratory studies.  In a static bioassay on rainbow  trout,
Lloyd (1961) found  that the toxicity of lead increased with a decrease
in oxygen  concentration.  Tubificid worms were more sensitive to lead at
pHs of 6.5 and 8.5, even though they showed more resistance at pH 7.5
(Whitley  1968).  In both cases, the direct effects of these parameters
may have  lowered the organisms' tolerance to lead.  However, the toxicity
of lead is enhanced in acidic waters, as the chemical equilibrium shifts
in the direction of free ion formation.

     Often, other heavy metals are found in waters polluted with lead
from mining runoff or "atmospheric emissions.  Copper, zinc, mercury, and
cadmium are toxic to varying degrees, and have some similar effects on
aquatic life.  In combination, heavy metals may either have a synergistic
or antagonistic interaction with respect to .toxicity.  Gray and Ventilla
(1973) combined zinc, mercury, and lead ions in solution to determine
the effect on Cristigera protozoa.  The growth rate was inhibited by
67.2%, compared with the theoretical reduction of 37.4% calculated  from
combining  the individual effects of the metals (i.e., a synergistic
effect was observed).
                                  6-8

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
      Other studies have also examined heavy metal interactions with lead.
 Pietilainen (1975) indicates that cadmium increased the toxicity of lead
 to phytoplankton communities if the cadmium concentration exceeded that
 of lead.   This effect was markedly lessened when the lead concentration
 was higher.   Benijts-Claus and Benijts (1975) found that both lead and
 zinc had  a significant adverse impact on the development of the mud
 crab, Rhithropanopeus harrisi.   In certain combinations, however, zinc
 apparently suppressed the more toxic lead, and larval growth actually
 accelerated.   In toxicity tests with zebrafish,  Ozoh (1979a) found that
 copper and lead at the highest concentrations used (72 ug/1) were mutu-
 ally suppressive with respect  to growth inhibition effects.

      Long-term exposure may affect the resistance of an aquatic organism.
 Certain data  show that fish can become acclimated to some chemicals so
 that their tolerance is increased, particularly  if previous generations
 were exposed.   Although no multi-generational studies were available for
 lead,  Davies  et al.  (1976) reported that sensitivity actually decreased
 in rainbow trout when exposed  as eggs;  specimens exposed after hatching
 were more resistant.

 6.1.5  Terrestrial Organisms

 6.1.5.1  Animals

      Most of  the information on lead toxicity to wildlife is concerned
 with effects  on waterfowl because  of the  concern for  the extensive  lead
 poisoning as  a result of the consumption of  spent lead  shot (see
 Section 6.2).   Other studies provide data on lead toxicosis in doves
 and gallinaceous birds.   Most  of the studies on  lead  in wildlife, other
 than waterfowl,  deal primarily with tissue residues,  because lead poison-
 ing has seldom been  observed in the field (see Section  4.2).

      The  symptoms generally  associated with  lead poisoning in waterfowl
 are lethargy,  anorexia,  weakness,  flaccid paralysis,  emaciation, anemia,
 greenish  diarrhea, im-paction of the proventriculus, and distention  of
 the gallbladder  (Clemens _et  al..  1975).  Most toxicity tests  with birds
 involve feeding  the  birds  a  certain number and type  (size)  of shot.
 Lead shot is particularly harmful  to birds because the  gizzard grinds
 the accumulated  shot  into  a  fine powder  that is  easily  absorbed in  the
 acidic  conditions  of  the  digestive  tract.  In mammals,  on  the other hand,
 the shot  normally  passes  through the digestive system,  with  only super-
 ficial  contact  and absorption  (Hartung 1973).

     Of the numerous experiments that have been conducted to assess the
toxicity of lead in birds, a representative  sample is presented  below.
Further discussion is contained  in Forbes and Sanderson  (1978).  Irby  et al.
 (1967) fed game farm mallards  (Anas  platyrgynchos) with 8, No.  6 lead  shot"
each; the birds survived an average  of 17 days after the dosage, and lost
an average of 37% of their initial body weight.  Seven captive  Canada
geese (Branta canadensis) dosed with 10 or more lead pellets died within
23 days (mean of 10 days), while two other geese fed 5 pellets  survived
                                    6-9

-------
      Evidence illustrates that diet plays a considerable role in  the
 degree to which lead affects various waterfowl species.  Lead pellets in
 mallards on a high fiber diet lost 46% of their initial weight within
 20 days after dosing, while pellets in ducks fed a low fiber diet lost
 bl/, of their initial weight during the same period (Clemens et al. 1974)
 Jordan and Bellrose (1951) found that the effects of dietaryleld in
 mallards were most severe in birds fed a diet of whole corn.  Effects
 were less pronounced when the mallards were fed smaller seeds such as
 wheat,  rice, and millet; when a grain diet was supplemented with aquatic
 greens, toxicosis was further mitigated.   Holmes (1975) reported that the
 addition ot egg albumen, oyster shell,  calcium carbonate, and phosphorous
 to mallard feed reduced the degree of lead toxicity bv 50% over a straight
 corn diet.                                            '                  =

      Of the waterfowl species,  the mallard appears  to be  the most susceo-
 tible to lead poisoning.  Bellrose (1959)  observed  three  species  of ducks
 feeding in flooded chufa beds.  Mallards  browsed on bottom tubers  pin-
 tail (Anas  acuta)  ate both bottom tubers  and  floating seeds,  while green-
 winged  teal (A.  cardinensis)  limited  their diet  to  floating seeds only
 The mallards had a mortality  rate ( 0.97%)  ten  times  that of pintail/
 while no  lead-poisoned teal were  found.   The  author attributed  the
 differential mortality rates  to a higher  incidence  of lead  in the gizzards
 of bottom-feeding  ducks,  which mistake lead pellets for aquatic seeds or
 grit   Diving species,  such as redhead (Ay_thya americana).  ring-necked
 duck (A.  collaris). and  canvasback  (A. valisneria)  are  also thought  to be
 more susceptible  to lead poisoning, although mallard  mortality is  usually
 higher  because of  their  preference  for large seeds  (Bellrose  1964).

 6.1.5.2   Plants

     Abundant data are available  on the effects of  lead on  both wild and
 crop plants, partly because of the concern for the human consumption of
 lead.  As with animals,  lead has  not been shown to be essential for plant
 growth.  Even low levels may cause growth irregularities.

     In a few instances, low concentrations of lead have been found to
 stimulate the growth of various crop plants, including barley, corn,
wheat, buckwheat and sugar.  However,  toxicosis is more often observed.
 Cultivated grasses exhibit an extremely wide range of sensitivities; for
 example, in one experiment, maize (Zea mays) and rye  (Secale cereale)
 showed no signs of toxicosis at lead acetate concentrations up to 100 mg/1.
 On the other hand, barley, oats,  and particularly wheat were damaged at
levels well below 100 mg/1 (Holl and Hampp 1975).
                                    6-10

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
      Bean  (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants were exposed  to  lead  at  concentra-
 tions of 33-33,000 mg/1.  At the lower  limit, growth was  stimulated,
 while no effects were apparent at 330 mg/1.  At 33,000 mg/1, the  plants
 were visibly damaged within 30 minutes, and died within 24  hours  (Holl
 and Hampp  1975).  Differentiating young tissues tended to be more
 sensitive  to lead than mature tissues.

      Other toxicity data indicate that  lead affects the photosynthetic
 process (Miles et a_l. 1972).  Lead chloride concentrations  as  low as
 14 mg/1 reduced chlorophyll synthesis significantly in oat  seedlings;
 moreover,  lead levels up to 140 mg/1 inhibited chlorophyll  b_ bynthesis
 to a greater extent than the chlorophyll ja synthesis (Hamp  and Lendzian
 1974).

      Airborne lead is another potential exposure pathway that may have
 sublethal effects on plants.   Bouganvillaea plants exposed  to  -7 ppm
 tetraethyl lead vapor at 25°C for 3 days abscised an average of 14% of
 their leaves.   Total recovery was observed 14 days after the exposure
 period (Siegal et al.  1973).   Davis and Barnes (1973)  report that 41-410
 mg/1 lead chloride in watering solutions reduced the stem and root dry
 weights  and height of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)  and red maple (Acer
 rubrum)  seedlings in two forest soils.   At higher concentrations,  root
 systems  also became reduced and blackened.

      Lead  toxicity to plants  depends  on the chemical composition of the
 soil.  As  with aquatic organisms,  the presence of  calcium, phosphates,
 and other  ions inhibit the  effects  of lead on plants.   Acidic  soils
 increase plant susceptibility  to  lead,  as  does increased  soil  temperature.
 The levels  of  organic nutrients  and soluble silicon may also affect lead
 uptake in  and  availability  to  plants  (NSF  1977).

 6.1.6  Summary

      Lead may  cause  acute toxicosis to  aquatic organisms at  concentrations
 as  low as 0.3  mg/1.   Sublethal effects  have been observed  in rainbow trout
 in  lead  concentrations of 7.6 yg/1.   It  appears as  if freshwater inver-
 tebrates have  a narrower range of lead  sensitivities than  fish, although
 this  result could be a function of the  test species  chosen.  Aquatic micro-
 flora have  exhibited  toxic effects in lead  levels between  0.05  mg/1 and
 28.0 mg/1.  The mummichog was the only marine  finfish tested for acute
 toxicosis;  the reported 96-hour LC$Q was 315 mg/1.  Marine invertebrates
 exhibited toxicosis  (acute,  chronic,  and sublethal) in  lead  concentra-
 tions between  0.05 mg/1 and >500 mg/1.

     Several water parameters strongly influence the aquatic toxicity of
 lead.  When the water hardness was raised from 28-353 mg/1,  the  96-hour
LC50 for rainbow trout increased by a factor of >400.  Similar toxicity-
suppressing effects of water hardness  were observed for fathead minnow
and bluegill.  The presence of phosphates,  chelating agents,  and nutrients
has also been observed to reduce lead  toxicity.  Water with a low pH
shifts the equilibrium of aqueous  lead toward free ion formation, which
increases toxicity.   Heavy  metal interactions with lead  may be  either
                                             6-11

-------
  synergistic  or  inhibitory,  depending  on  the  specific  combination.   Rela-
  tively little information exists on the  comparative toxicity  of various
  rorms of lead.

      With the consideration of all of these  variables,  a  range  of  lead
  concentrations  can be categorized for toxicity as shown below.   These
  ranges are only a very general guide for the assessment of  the  potential
  ecological impact of a given lead concentration in an aquatic environment,

      •   10 ug/1     Life-cycle toxicity test in soft water produced
                      abnormal development in rainbow trout.  All
                      other species tested are unaffected.

      •  10-100 ug/1  Sublethal effects,  such as tail and fin
                      degeneration,  reported for several freshwater
                      fish species in soft water,  as well as growth
                      inhibition in sensitive freshwater algae.
                      Chronic toxicity  reported  in  soft water and
                      are based on the  effects on early life stages
                      in fish and life  cycle test  in Daphnia.

      •  100-1000     Sublethal toxicosis  in a variety  of freshwater
         "S/1          fish and invertebrates in soft and moderately
                      hard water.  Acute  effects observed in
                      stickleback  and some invertebrates.  Numerous
                      species  of  freshwater  algae adversely affected,
                      as well  as more sensitive  marine  microflora.


      •  1.0-10.0     Acute toxicity  level for several  freshwater
        m8/!          fish and  invertebrate  species  in  soft water
                      and  for  sensitive marine invertebrates.
                      Algicidal for some marine  algae.

      •  10.0-100     Acute effects observed in  a variety of  fresh-
        mS/l          water fish and in most invertebrates  tested.
                      All  algae species tested sensitive  in this
                      range.

      •   100 mg/1     Only the most resistant  species (e.g.  red
                      shiner, mosquitofish, cockle) are able  to
                      survive, even for short periods, in this
                      range of concentrations.  Tolerance to  such
                      levels would be increased in hard water.

      To protect  freshwater aquatic life,  the U.S.  EPA  (1980) has estab-
lished a function of  the  criterion for lead (as total recoverable lead)
hardness, i.e., e (2.35 [In hardness]-9.48) as a 24-hour average, and
the concentration (in pg/1) should not  exceed e C1-22 Un hardness]-0.47)
At hardness of 50,  100, and 200 mg/1 as CaC03, the criteria are  0.75, 3.8*,
and 28 ug/1,  respectively as  a 24-hour average and the respective maxima
would be 74,  170, and 140 ug/1.
                                  6-12

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
     Data on lead toxicity in waterfowl, doves, and gallinaceous birds
are plentiful, and indicate that the ingestion of spent lead shot can
be lethal.  Mallards and diving ducks are particularly susceptible,
largely as a result of feeding habits rather than physiological vulner-
ability.

     Lead toxicosis has been observed in terrestrial plants from lead
concentrations ranging from 0.005-33,000 mg/1 in culture or watering
solutions.  Effects include growth stimulation (at very low levels),
growth inhibition, leaf yellox^ing, abscission, inhibition of mitosis
and chlorophyll synthesis, loss of turgor pressure, and death.  Lead
toxicity to plants is mitigated by factors similar to those in aquatic
environments, i.e., high pH, high calcium and phosphate levels; in
addition, the temperature, organic nutrient and soluble silicon content
of the soil influence the toxicity of lead.

6.2  EXPOSURE TO BIOTA

6.2.1  Introduction

     Lead is a pervasive element that appears at various concentrations
in air, water, and soil systems, as well as in the tissues of organisms
(see Section 4.2).  In this section, lead exposure levels to aquatic
and terrestrial biota are discussed, with special focus on factors that
lead to acute and chronic exposure.  For aquatic life, the following
topics are reviewed:

     •  The various pathways of exposure in fish, invertebrates,
        and algae;

     •  Chemical parameters in the aquatic environment that may
        affect the degree of exposure to lead and uptake of the
        metal by biota;

     •  Areas of the country in which relatively high lead concen-
        trations were reported in 1979; and

     •  Recent incidents of elevated lead exposure in various
        water bodies.

     Data on lead exposure to terrestrial mammals are limited mainly to
comparative residue studies on rodents in urban and rural locations.  A
considerable amount of information on lead in waterfowl is available,
as a result of the widespread problem of exposure to spent lead shot.
Habitat conditions and other factors, such as hunting pressure, are
described for their effects on the availability of lead 'shot for inges-
tion by waterfowl.

     Terrestrial plants are exposed to elevated lead concentrations
primarily in the vicinity of anthropogenic sources.   The chemical
properties of the soil are crucial in determining the availability of
lead.


                                   6-13

-------
 6.2.2   Aquatic  Organisms

 6.2.2.1  Pathways  of  Exposure

     The  three  general  pathways  of  exposure in aquatic fauna consisting
 of  diet,  direct absorption  from  the water,  and contact (dermal or
 dietary)  with sediment.   As with other  heavy metals,  relatively few
 studies attempt to evaluate the  relevance  of each of  these pathways to
 different species.  Moreover,  the available data  provide conflicting
 evidence  concerning routes  of  uptake, particularly with fish.


     Lead residues in many  invertebrates reflect  levels found  in sedi-
 ment; however,  it  remains unclear whether  the lead is  strongly concen-
 trated  from water  or  absorbed  from  sediment.   Tubificid worms  collected
 by  Mathis and Cummings  (1973)  reported  lead residues  equivalent to
 sediment  concentrations, while aqueous  lead levels were four orders of
 magnitude lower.

     McNurney and  co-workers (1977) measured  residues  in a  variety  of
 freshwater stream  organisms and  found a positive  correlation between
 lead burden and  the degree  of sediment  contact.   Burrowing  oligochaetes
 and insect larvae  had the highest lead  residues,  followed by fauna
 (pelecypods, crayfish, darters)  subsisting  at the sediment-water  inter-
 face.   Lower residues were  detected in  bottom-feeding  omnivorous  fish,
 while carnivores,  which have very little contact  with  settled  or  sus-
 pended  sediments,  had the lowest  body burdens.  The authors hypothesized
 that food was the  main source of  lead in carnivores; however,  they  were
 uncertain of the dominant exposure pathway  for the  lower organisms.

     Some circumstantial evidence demonstrates that suspended  sediments
 and food particles are the  primary source of  lead  to filter-feeders.
 Bryan (1973) attributed seasonal  changes in lead  tissue  levels  in two
 scallop species  to variations in  food supply  in the form of suspended
 matters.  Bryan and Uysal (1978)   concluded  that the ingestion  of sus-
 pended  sediments was the main pathway for lead uptake  in  the clam
 (Scrobicularia plana), because lead accumulated primarily in the diges-
 tive gland.

     The relative  importance of sediment and waterborne  lead has also
 been examined for  fish.   In long-term tests with  rainbow trout  (Salmo
 gairdneri),  Hodson £t al.  (1978)  added  lead in various concentrations
 to the diet.   With doses up to 950 yg/day,  the fish excreted virtually
 all ingested lead.   At doses between 1935 yg/day and 3160 yg/day,
 approximately 50% was excreted; however, because no bioaccumulation
was observed,  the authors assumed some experimental error in the analy-
 sis of excreta at higher doses.

     Such highly efficient depuration, at least at low concentrations,
 could explain why.the predatory fish collected by NcNurney _e_t ad. (1977)
                                  6-14

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
 i
 i
 i
 i
 i
had low lead residues despite the high body burdens in  lower-order
fauna.  On the other hand, Hardisty et al. (1974) discerned a distinct
correlation between tissue concentrations and crustacean consumption in
seven teleost species.  Schell and Barnes (1974) found  that lead resi-
dues in the northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) decreased
with age.  One explanation was that younger fish ate zooplankton, which
are high in lead, while older fish preyed on various fish species with
low lead burdens.  Butterworth _et_ al. (1972) reported a steady increase
in lead residues with ascending trophic levels in an estuary.  However,
most of the evidence does not indicate significant biomagnification of
lead in food chains (Wong _et al. 1978).

     In contrast to their work with exposure via ingestion, Hodson and
co-workers (1978) measured tissue concentrations in rainbow trout after
various periods of exposure to lead and found a linear  relationship to
aqueous lead concentrations.  High aqueous lead levels  resulted in
elevated residues in the gills and kidneys, which, in turn, reflected
the direct contact of gills with lead-contaminated water and the possible
excretion of lead via urine.  Thus, it is apparent that both ingestion
of lead in food sources, as well as gill contact with water can result
in exposure to lead.


6.2.2.2  Environmental Factors Affecting Lead Exposure  and Uptake
                                                              «
     The variables that alter the toxicity of lead to aquatic organisms
may influence the availability of lead for uptake.  Acidic water shifts
the equilibrium of soluble lead toward the more toxic free ion form.
Pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) exposed to fc03Pb at pH 6.0 accumu-
lated three times as much lead as they did at pH 7.5 (Merlini and Pozzi
1977).  These results suggest that free ionic lead is the form most
available for uptake.

     Water hardness levels also affect the solubility of lead, and hence
its availability for absorption.  Varanasi and Markey (1977) studied lead
accumulation by rainbow trout in waters of varying hardness.  Calcium
(as CaCOs) had a significant mitigative effect on lead  uptake rates;
however, the authors hypothesized that lead might, in turn, inhibit cal-
cium absorption required for bone growth by the trout.

     The presence of other metals may affect lead uptake.  Luoma and
Bryan  (1978) indicated a possible antagonistic relationship between lead
and iron.  Lead residues in the clam  (Scrobicularia plana) were inversely
proportional to sediment concentrations of amorphic iron in 17 estuarine
locations.  The strong negative correlation between these two variables
led the  authors to speculate that the Pb:Fe ratio in sediments may be a
good indicator of biologically available lead.

     Brown  (1977) studied lead uptake bioaccumulation experiments on
three groups of isopods  (Asellus meridianus) collected  from different
areas.   The most tolerant group accumulated the most lead, and thus
probably had a greater ability to store and detoxify the metal.  The


                                  6-15

-------
 tolerant  group  also  had  much higher levels of sulfur,  which suggests
 that  the  detoxification  mechanism was  a possible sulfhydryl binding of
 lead.   Thus,  as with toxicity,  various factors appear  "to affect lead
 uptake  and  hence exposure.   Such factors include pH, water hardness,
 inhibition  by other  metals,  and acclimation.

 6.2.2.3  Monitoring  Pat .a

      The  most complete data  base for measured levels of  ambient aqueous
 lead  in the U.S.  river basins was  found in STORET.  Major basin data are
 analyzed  in Section  4.2.  Table 6-5 lists  minor  basins with mean total
 lead  levels >50 ug/1, which  represents a level at which  sublethal effects
 have  been observed,  although some  chronic  values of <50  ug/1 have been
 reported.   Lead levels of -100  ug/1 may be lethal to some species,
 depending on  the duration of exposure  and  various chemical factors.
 These values  are means of positive  values  only;  thus, they reflect  a
 somewhat  higher mean than if all the values had  been included.   Of  the
 basins  listed,  those with water  hardness usually <50 mg/1 as CaC03  are
 also  identified,  because soft water effectively  increases lead  exposure
 levels.

      Two  minor  basins had mean  lead levels  >100  ug/1.  The Catawba-
 Wateref Basin in the  Southeast  had  an  average  lead concentration  of
 124.5 ug/1, with 50.0% of the positive  observations >100  ug/1.  The
 Kanawha River in  the  Ohio River  Valley  had a mean lead level of
 148.7 Ug/1, with 7.5% of the measurements  >100 ug/1.  In  this case,
 the mean  was most likely skewed  by  a few extremely high measurements,
 including a maximum  of 7000  ug/1.   Other minor basins with a  relatively
 high proportion  of boservations  (>20%)  >100 ug/1 were the  James River  in
 the North Atlantic,  the Fox River-Wolf  Creek drainage area near Lake
 Michigan  and  the  Kootenai River  in  the  Northwest.

     Reports  in  the  literature of elevated lead  concentrations that
 result from a specific source are uncommon; thus, little  opportunity is
 provided  to assess the effects of acute exposure in the field.  Two
 reports of fish kills related to lead concentrations were  found.  In
 one, in 1970,  the total lead concentration was about 1000  ug/1 at some
 type of industrial operation in Glover, Missouri.  The other occurred at
 an old smelter site in Henrietta, Oklahoma in 1973.   The reported lead
 concentration was 23,600 ug/1 (U.S. EPA 1979).

 6.2.3  Terrestrial Organisms

 6.2.3.1  Mammals

     Little information is  available on lead exposure  levels to mammals
probably because of the lack of observations of lead poisoning in field
situations.  Most of  the available studies are primarily concerned with
correlations between  proximity to anthropogenic sources  of lead and
residues in wild specimens.
                                  6-16

-------
      TABLE 6-5.
                           MEASUREMENTS OF TOTAL LEAD CONCENTRATIONS  IN  U.S.  MINOR RIVER BASINS,  1979
        River Basin
Ma.1 or /Minor     Name
i
^i
           1/33
           1/34
           2/3
           2/16
           3/7
 3/9
 3/13
 3/24
 3/28
 5/3
 5/7
 5/9
 8/24
 8/25
 9/8
 9/12
10/8
         11/4
         H/5
         12/4
         13/1
         13/3
         15/7
                Lower Hudson — NY Metropolitan Area
                New Jersey Coast
                Delaware River — Zone 1
                James River
                Yadkin-Pee Dee-Lower Pee Dee River
                Catawba-Wateref, Congaree,  Santee-Cooper Res.
                Edisto-Combahef River
                Savannah River
                Tampa Bay Area
                Lower Florida Area
                Beaber River
                Kanawha River
                Big Sandy River
                Green Bay Western Shore
                Fox River — Wolf Creek
                Lower Platte River from  North Platte
                Lower Missouri  River  from Niobrara River
                North Canadian  River
                Lower Colorado  River
                Middle Colorado  River — San Juan River
                Gila  River
                Green River
                Brazos  River
                Kootenai  River
                Spokane River
                Santa Ana River
                Northwestern Lahontan
                Great Salt Lake
                                                              Mean
                                                             >5°
        Basins  with >. 10 measurements  in  1979.

       b!978  data.
       Note:  There  are  307 minor river basins in the continental  U.S.

       Source:  U.S.  EPA C1980).
                                                                 *
                                                                 *
                                                                 *
                                                                 *
                                                                          *
                                                                          *
                                                                          *
                                                                          *
                                                                          A
                                                                          *
                                                                                 ~10% of Pb    *50* of Hardness
                                                                                 >100 iig/1   Measurements  <50
*
*
*
*

*
*
*
*
*

-------
      Williamson and Evans (1972) examined the lead burdens in a variety
 of small mammals, and found no evidence of biomagnification in food
 chains.   Though carnivorous shrews generally had higher residues than
 herbivorous mice, both groups contained less lead than their respective
 food sources.   Shrews and mice collected close to roads had higher lead
 burdens  than specimens collected at distances from roads.

      In  a study of lead residues in voles and field mice in England,
 Jeffries and French (1972) found similar results.  Body burdens ranged
 from an  average of 4.19 yg/g dry weight on woodland and arable sites
 to 5.98  jjg/g near minor roads to a maximum of 7.00 ug/g near a busy
 highway.  Mouw et al.  (1975) found that lead residues in the bones" and
 kidneys  of urban rats were twenty times greater than those in rural rats,
 while concentrations in feces were four times higher.   Rolfe and Haney
 (1975) analyzed eight species of small mammals in Illinois to determine
 the effects of proximity to roadways.   Except for two species,  animals
 trapped  along  medium-use roads had tissue levels  intermediate to those
 captured along high- and low-use roads.   These authors detected no
 seasonal variations in tissue concentrations of lead.   Thus,  evidence
 of elevated exposure to lead in terrestrial  mammals  has been  observed
 in the vicinity of highways.

 6.2.3.2   Birds

      There  are  several  possible  pathways  for  lead  exposure  to birds.
 Bagley and  Locke  (1967)  indicate  that  all birds are regularly exposed  to
 sublethal  levels of  lead  in  their  food.   Atmospheric lead  fallout
 (originating from  industrial and  auto  emissions)  is a  potential exposure
 route; however, more data must be acquired on this potential exposure
 route.   Still,  Forbes and Sanderson  (1978) have recorded several reports
 of waterfowl mortality caused by runoff from  mine wastes and ingestion
 of mine  tailings.

      One source, however, appears to account  for nearly all cases of
 lead  toxicosis  in birds.  Each year, over 3000 tons of lead shot are
 deposited by waterfowl hunters in marshes, lakes, and  fields of the
United States, while as many as 122,000 lead  pellets per acre have been
 found in some areas  (U.S. FWS 1976).  Numerous species ingest the spent
 shot, mistaking it for grit or plant seeds, or eating  it by accident as
 they  forage.

     Many instances of lead-related waterfowl kills in large numbers
have been reported; written accounts date from as early as 1894 (Grinnell
 1894).  Quortroup and Shillinger  (1941) concluded that lead poisoning
was the third most important (8.6% of the total) cause of death in 3000
specimens taken from various western lakes.   Perhaps, because of the
 increased monitoring of waterfowl populations, such incidents have been
reported more frequently over the last 30 years.  In the most comprehen-
sive survey, Bellrose (1959) reported 34 waterfowl die-offs in the United
                                   6-18

-------
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
States, between 1937 and 1957, with mortalities ranging from 100 to
16,000 in each event.  Die-offs occurred in each of the four major
flyways (Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and Pacific); the greatest
number of casualties occurred in the Mississippi flyway.  However,
Jordan and Bellrose  (1951) believe that small, day-to-day losses
constitute a larger portion of total lead-related mortalities than
spectacular die-offs that receive more publicity.

     Many factors may influence lead exposure levels to waterfowl.
First, the hunting pressure determines how much lead shot will be
scattered over a given area.  As a measure of hunting pressure, the
U.S. FWS (1976) estimated waterfowl hunter days in each of the major
flyways for the period 1952-71.  The Mississippi flyway had 40-45% of
the total hunter days, the Central flyway had >20%, and the Atlantic
and Pacific flyways each had <20% of the hunting activity.

     The characteristics of lake and marsh bottoms also affect exposure
levels; for example, in soft lake beds the lead shot sinks into sedi-
ment, which renders it relatively unavailable for consumption.  Bellrose
(1959) found that in such areas, little of the exposed shot is carried
over from one year to the next; therefore, more lead shot would probably
be available during and soon after the hunting season.  On hard bottoms,
however, spent shot may simply accumulate on a yearly basis.  The ice
cover and prevailing water levels also affect the degree of exposure,
because they determine the size of the area in which waterfowl may come
into contact with spent shot  (Forbes and Sanderson 1978).

     Dietary factors are important in lead exposure to waterfowl.  Birds
that consume mostly large quantities of corn are generally more suscep-
tible to lead poisoning (Bellrose 1964).  Various toxicity studies (see
Section 6.1.5.1)  have shown that diets high in calcium, phosphorous,
and other nutrients led to decreased sensitivity in ducks.  The addition
of smaller grain seeds and aquatic plants to the diet mitigate the toxic
effects of lead to some degree (Jordan and Bellrose 1951).  Moreover,
birds consuming large quantities of food are apparently less likely to
experience lead poisoning (Bellrose 1964).


     Because the various waterfowl have different feeding habits, some
species naturally have greater levels of exposure.  Diving ducks, on the
whole, are more likely to ingest lead pellets because they feed on seeds,
tubers, and rootstocks at lake bottoms.  Lead pellets may be mistaken
for certain aquatic  seeds because of their similar size and shape; thus,
they are consumed.   Bellrose  (1959) examined the gizzard contents of
waterfowl bagged by  hunters; he found the highest incidence of lead shot
in diving ducks.  Between 12 and 14% of all canvasback, redhead, lesser
scaup, and ring-necked ducks had ingested lead pellets that had remained
in the gizzard.  In  addition, birds that prefer corn, such as Canada
geese, mallards, pintail and other species of dabbling ducks, ingest more
lead pellets than most other types of waterfowl.
                                  6-19

-------
      Lead poisoning has been reported in other types of birds; however,
 it is, in general, a rare phenomenon.  Calvert (1876) and Holland  (1882)
 reported pheasants ill from ingesting lead shot.   Of 1977 gizzards of
 Gruiformes (cranes and rails),  only 49 had lead shot, and nearly one-half
 were from sora rails.  Jones (1939) doubted that cranes or limpkins ever
 ingested spent shot.   Campbell (1950) reported the finding of a dead
 scaled quail with 13 lead pellets in its crop.  In 1949 gizzards from
 doves taken by hunters, Lewis and Legler (1968) found a 1% incidence of
 lead pellets.   A University of Minnesota study cited by the U.S.  FWS
 (1980) found that one-fourth of the castings beneath bald eagle roosting
 trees contained lead shot.   Several deaths from lead poisoning in bald
 eagles have been reported;  mortality is more likely if the shot is
 retained in the digestive tract rather than cast  (U.S.  FWS 1980).

       Lead accumulates in various bird tissues, most notably in bones.
 According to the U.S.  FWS (1976), low-level chronic exposure to lead
 (as  in diet)  results  in comparatively high levels  in bones,  lower levels
 in liver and kidney,  and still  lower levels in heart, lung,  muscle, and
 brain.   High levels in liver and  kidney as well as  bone are indicative
 of recent acute exposure.   One  experiment cited by  the  U.S.  FWS (1976)
 demonstrated that the ingestion of a single lead pellet can produce high
 lead concentrations in the  wing bones of ducks.  Of the 28 species of
 birds examined by Bagley and Locke (1967),  tissues  from the  osprey, an
 aquatic predator,  had the highest lead burdens.

       Several  studies  have  been conducted to  determine  the effect  of
 urban versus  rural environments on lead residues in birds.   Tansy  and
 Roth (1970)  found that pigeons  in urban areas  had higher lead  residues
 in bone,  feathers,  and kidneys  than their rural counterparts,  although
 concentrations in blood were similar.   Ohi _et  al.  (1974)  also  compared
 rural with urban pigeons;  they  found the  greatest differences  in  the
 femur (bone),  ALA-D enzyme  activity,  and  blood.  Getz et_ al.  (1977)
 measured  lead  residues  in five  passerine  (songbird)  species", and  found
 that urban specimens had uniformly higher burdens in  feathers,  butt, liver,
 lung,  kidney,  bone, and muscle.

 6.2.3.3   Terrestrial Plants

     The  potential  for  exposure of  terrestrial flora  to lead increases  in
areas of  high  lead  particulate deposition.  Sources contributing high levels
to the atmosphere include lead smelters, highways,  various stack-discharging
industries, and urban areas  in general.  Mining areas have high associated
levels of  lead in soil.  Section  4.2  (Tables 4-4 to 4-6) presents concentra-
tions in  air,  soil, and vegetation associated with specific sources.  Lead
may be absorbed from deposition directly on leaves and stems or taken up
from soil  contaminated by particulate fall-out.  Higher exposure levels
are associated with direct deposition; however, cuticle barriers and
washing off during rain or wind activities reduce the concentrations
taken up  by plants  (see Section 4.3).  Soil-originated exposure levels
are usually lower but more persistent as a result of  immobilization of
lead in the upper soil profile.   Once lead is taken up into vegetation,
                                   6-20

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
it is likely to persist, and will recycle into the system with the carbon
cycle.

      Environmental factors influencing plant uptake of lead from soil
and subsequent exposure include pH, presence of other nutrients and metals,
and species acclimation.  Low soil pH is favorable to uptake (MacLean et al.
1969); thus, standard agricultural practices (e.g. liming of soil) may
decrease accumulation.  The presence of calcium ions inhibits lead uptake
(Wilkins 1957), and phosphate deficient plants are more susceptible to lead
effects than normal plants  (Koeppe and Miller 1970).  In addition, Peterson
(1978) has observed lead-tolerant ecotypes for several floral species that
have had long-term exposure to the metal.

6.2.3.4  Summary

      There are several possible pathways of lead exposure to aquatic
fauna, including water, diet, and sediment.  Most likely, contact with
sediment is an important exposure route, particularly for benthic inver-
tebrates and filter feeders.  However, the assertion that sediment is the
most important pathway for  these organisms is based largely on circumstan-
tial evidence; such conclusions must be verified by experiments that
isolate the effects of water-borne and sediment-borne lead.   Data on lead
uptake by fish are scarce,  although there is evidence for uptake from
water and diet.  However, sediment remains a potential direct or indirect
source of large quantities  of lead for invertebrates and vertebrates alike.

      Lead exposure to aquatic organisms is enhanced by soft, acidic
waters, and the presence of lead sources, such as industrial or automo-
tive emissions, lead mines, and urban areas in general.

      For minor river basins, STORET monitoring data indicate that mean
total lead concentrations were generally <50 yg/1 in 1979.  Furthermore,
because biologically available lead comprises only a fraction of total
lead, exposure levels are normally well below 50 yg/1.  Minor basins
with relatively high concentrations are listed in Table 6-5.  Only a few
instances of fish kills caused by lead have been reported; however,
elevated residues have been observed in areas with high aqueous lead
levels.

      Information on mammals is limited mainly to studies of rodents
with varying degrees of exposure to urban and automotive lead.   One
study reported no evidence  of lead biomagnification from food sources
for shrews and mice.

      Over the last century, there have been numerous reports of water-
fowl mortality as a result of the ingestion of spent lead shot.  Water-
fowl kills are more prevalent in areas under heavy hunting pressure (such
as the Mississippi flyway) and in lakes and marshes with hard bottoms,
where lead shot can accumulate.  Exposure is also greater for diving
ducks, which have access to lead on lake bottoms, and for species that
eat mainly large seeds, such as corn.   Lead poisoning is relatively rare
                                 6-21

-------
in other types of birds.  However, species dwelling  in urban  areas  (e.g.,
pigeons) are reported to have higher lead residues than  their rural  coun-
terparts.  Lead accumulates most strongly in the bones of all species
examined.

     Lead exposure to terrestrial plants increases above background
levels in areas of high lead particulate deposition.  As for  other
organisms, sources include lead smelters, automobiles, various indus-
tries, and urban areas in general.  Lead may be absorbed either through
leaf or root tissues; direct deposition on leaves comprises a  larger
proportion of lead exposure than lead in soil; however, cuticle barriers
and washing off will reduce absorption through leaves.  Soils with low
pH and calcium content are conducive to uptake through the roots.  In
natural conditions, lead poisoning is extremely rare; however, elevated
residues in crop plants may increase human exposure levels.

     The significance of high, but non-toxic, levels of lead in plants
in this exposure assessment should be stressed.  Human exposure through
the ingestion of contaminated crops by humans can be an important path-
way,  which is described in Section 5.2.  Non-human biota ingesting
vegetation may be similarly exposed.
                                  6-22

-------
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
i
1
i
i
i
i
t
i
i
i
                                REFERENCES

Anderson, R.V.   The  effects  of  lead  on  oxygen uptake in the crayfish,
Oronectes virilis  (HAGEN).   Bull.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxicol. 20:394-400;
1973.

Bagley, G.E.; Locke, L.N.  Bull.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxicol.  2:297-305;
1967.   (As  cited by  Forbes and  Sanderson 1978)

Barber, R.T.; Ryther,  J.H.   J.  Exp.  Mar. Biol.  Ecol.  3:191-199;  1969.
(As  cited by Wong _et al.  1978)

Battelle Columbus Laboratories  (BCL).   Water quality criteria data book.
Volume  3:   Effects of  chemicals on aquatic  life.   Contract  No.  68-01-0007.
Washington, DC:  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency;  1971.

Bell, M.A.; Ewing, R.A.;  Lutz,  G.A.; Holoman, V.L.;  Paris,  B.;  Krause, H.H.
Reviews of  the environmental effects of pollutants:   VII.   Lead.   Report
No.  EPA-600/1-78-029.  Washington, DC:   U.S.  Environmental  Protection
Agency; 1979.

Bellrose, F.C.   111. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull.  27:235-288;  1959.   (As cited
by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

Bellrose, F.C.  Waterfowl tomorrow.  Washington, DC:  U.S.  Fish and Wild-
life Service;  1964:  479-485.   (As cited by Forbes and  Sanderson  1978)

Benijts-Claus, C.; Benijts,  F.  In:  Koeman,  J.H.;  Strik, J.J.  eds.
Sublethal effects of toxic chemicals on aquatic animals.  Amsterdam:
Elsevier; 1975.  (As cited by U.S. EPA  1978)

Biesinger, K.E.; Christensen, G.M.  The effect  of various metals  on
survival, growth, reproduction  and metabolism of Daphnia magna.   J. Fish.
Res. Bd. Can.  29:1691-1700;  1972.  (As  cited  by Wong  et  al. 1978)

Brown, B.E.  Observations on the  tolerance of the isopod Asellus  meridianus
Rac.  Freshwater Biol. 7:235-244; 1977.  (As  cited by Phillips and Russo 1978)

Brown, B.E.  Uptake of copper and  lead  by a metal-tolerant  isopod
Asellus meridianus Rac.   Freshwater Biol. 7:235-244;. 1977.   (As cited
by Phillips and  Russo 1978)

Brown, B.; Ahnsulla, M.  Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2:182; 1971.  (As cited by
Tornabene gt_ al. 1977)

Bryan, G.W.  J. Mar. Biol. Assn.  (U.K.)  53:145-166;  1973.   (As cited  by
Wong et al. 1978)

Bryan, G.W.; Uysal, H.  Heavy metals in the burrowing bivalve
Scrobicularia plana from  the Tamar estuary in relation  to environ-
mental levels.  J.  Mar. Biol. Assn.  (U.K.) 58:89; 1978.  (As cited
by Leland ejt al. 1979)
                                  6-23

-------
 Butterworth, J.; Lester, P.; Nickless, G.  Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  3-72-74-
 1972.  (As cited by Wong et al. 1978)                                 '

 Calvert,  H.S.  The Field 47:189; 1876.   (As cited by  Forbes  and  Sanderson


 Campbell, H.  J.  Wildlife Managmt. 14:243-244; 1950.   (As  ciced  by  Forbes
 and Sanderson 1978)

 Christensen, G.M.  Biochemical effects of methylmercuric chloride
 cadmium chloride and lead nitrate on embryos and alevins of  the  brook
 trout.   Toxicol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.  32:191-197;  1975.    (As cited by
 Wong _et al.  1978)

 Clemens,  E.T.;  Krook,  L.;  Aronson,  A.L.;  Stevens, C.E.  Pathogenesis of
 lead shot poisoning in the mallard duck.   Ithaca, NY:   Cornell University
 Depts.  Physiol.,  Biochem.,  Pharmacol., and Pathol.,  N.Y. State Vet.
 College;  1974.   28  p.   (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

 Clemens,  E.T.;  Krook,  L.;  Aronson,  A.L.;  Stevens, C.E.  Pathogenic
 lead shot poisoning in the mallard  duck.   Ithaca, NY:   Cornell University,
 N.Y.  State Vet.  College;  1975:   248-285.   (As  cited  by U.S. EPA 1977)

 Cook, R.S.;  Trainer, D.O.   J. Wildlife Managmt. 30:1-8; 1966.   (As cited
 by  Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

 Damron, B.L. ; Wilson, H.R.   Bull. Environ.  Contain. Toxicol. 14:489-496;
 1975.   (As cited  by Forbes  and  Sanderson  1978)

 Davies, P.H.; Goettl, J.P.  Jr.;  Sinley, J.R.;  Smith, N.F.   Acute  and
 chronic toxicity  of lead to rainbow  trout Salmo gairdneri in  hard and
 soft water.   Water  Res. 10:199-206;  1976.

 Davis, J.B.;  Barnes, R.L.   Effects of  soil-applied fluoride and lead
 on  growth of  loblolly pine  and  red maple.   Environ. Pollut. 5(l):35-44-
 1973.   (As cited  by Bell et al.  1979)

 Billing, W.J.; Healey,  C.W.; Smith, W.C.  Ann. Appl. Biol.  13sl68-176;
 1926.   (As cited  by Wong et al.  1978)

 Diters,  R.W.; Nielsen,  S.W.  Lead poisoning of raccoons  in  Connecticut.
 J. Wildlife Dis.  14:187-191; 1978.

 Doelman, P.  Lead and terrestrial microbiota.  Nriagu, J.O. ed.   The
 biogeochemistry of  lead.  New York, NY:  Elsevier-North Holland Biomedical
Press; 1978.

Dorfman, D.  Tolerance of Fundulus heteroclitus to different metals in
salt waters.   Bull.  New Jersey Acad. Sci.  22(2):21-23; 1977.
                                   6-24

-------
 Drucker, H.;  Wildung, R.E. eds.  Biological implications of metals  in
 the environment.  Proceedings of the fifteenth annual Hanford life
 sciences symposium; 1975 September 29-October 1.  Richland, WA; 1977.
 Available from:  Technical Information Center, USERDA.

 Forbes,  R.M.;  Sanderson, G.C.  Lead toxicity in domestic animals and
 wildlife.  Nriagu,  J.O.  ed.   The biogeochemistry of lead in the
 environment.   New York,  NY:   Elsevier-North Holland Biomedical Press;
 1978.

 Gale,  N.L.;  Hardie, M.G.;  Jennett,  J.C.;  Aleti,  A.  Transport of trace
 pollutants in lead mining  wastewaters.   Hemphill, D.D. ed.  Trace sub-
 stances  in environmental health-VI.   Proceedings of the University of
 Missouri 6th  annual conference on trace substances in environmental
 health;  1970 June 23-25, Columbia, MO:  University of  Missouri;  1973.
 (As  cited by Bell et  al. 1979)

 Getz,  L.L.; Best,  L.B.;  Prather,  M.   Lead in urban and rural song birds,
 Environ.  Poll.  12:235-238;  1977.   (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977)

 Gray,  J.S.; Ventilla, R.J.   Ambio 2:118-121;  1973.  (As cited  by
 Wong et  al. 1978)

 Grinnell,  G.B.   Lead  poisoning.   Forest and Stream 42(6):117-118;  1894.
 (As  cited by U.S. FWS 1976)

 Hampp, R.; Lendzian,  K.  Effect of lead ions  on  chlorophyll synthesis.
 Naturwiss. 61(5) :218-219;  1974.   (As  cited  by Bell e_t  al.  1979)

 Hannan,  P.J.; Patouillet,  C.   In:  Ruivo, M.  ed.  Marine pollution  and
 sea  life.  London,  England:   Fishing  News Ltd.;  1978.   (As  cited by
 Wong et  al. 1978)

 Hardisty,  M.W.;  Kartar,  S.;  Sainsbury,  M.   Mar.  Pollut. Bull.  5:61-63;
 1974.  (As cited by Wong et  al. 1978)

 Hartung,  R.  Biological  effects of heavy metal pollutants  in water.
 Adv. Exptl. Med. Biol. 40:161-172; 1973.

 Hodson, P.V.; Blunt,  B.R.; Spry, D.J.   Chronic toxicity of  water-borne
 and  dietary lead to rainbow  trout (Salmo gairdneri)  in Lake Ontario
water.   Water Res.  12:869-878; 1978.

Roll, W.; Hampp, R.   Lead and plants.   Residue Rev.  54:79-111; 1975.
 (As  cited by Bell et  al.  1979)

Holland,  G.  The Field 59:232; 1882.  (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson
1978)

Holmes, R.S.   Lead poisoning in waterfowl — dosage and dietary study.
111. Nat. Hist.  Surv., Olin Corp., Winchester Group; 1975:  70 p.
 (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)
                                   6-25

-------
 Irby,  H.D.;  Locke,  L.N. ;  Bagley, G.E.  J. Wildlife Managmt.  31:253-257;
 1967.   (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

 Jeffries,  D.J.;  French,  M.C.   Lead concentrations in small mammals
 trapped on roadside verges and field sites.  Environ. Poll. 3:147-156-
 1972.   (As cited by U.S.  EPA 1977)

 Jones,  J.R.E.   The  relative toxicity of salts and lead, zinc., and copper
 to  the  stickleback  (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) and the effect of calcium
 on  the  toxicity  of  lead  and zinc salts.  J. Exp. Biol. 15:394-407; 1938.
 (As cited  by Battelle Columbus Laboratories 1971)

 Jones,  J.C.   J.  Wildlife  Managmt.  3:353-357; 1938.   (As cited by Forbes
 and Sanderson 1978)

 Jones,  L.H.;  Clement,  C.R.;  Hopper,  M.J.   Lead uptake from solution by
 perennial  ryegrass  and its transport from roots to shots.   Plant Soil'
 38(2):403-414; 1973.   (As cited by Bell et al.  1979)

 Jones,  M.B.   Synergistic  effects of  salinity,  temperature, and heavy      '
 metal on mortality  and osmoregulation in  marine and estuarine isopods
 (Crustacea).  Mar.  Biol.  30:13-20;  1975.

 Jordan, J.S.; Bellrose, F.C.   Lead poisoning in wild  waterfowl.   111.
 Nat. Hist. Biol. Notes 26:1-27;  1951.   (As  cited by U.S. FWS  1976)

 Kaplan, H.M. .et  al.   Toxicity  of lead nitrate  solutions  for frogs (Rana
 pipiens).  Lab.  Anim.  Care 17:240; 1967.   (As  cited by U.S.  EPA  1978d)

 Kemp, H.T.; Little, R.L.;  Holoman, V.L.;  Darby,  R.L.   Water quality
 criteria data book - Vol.  5.   Effects  of  chemicals  on aquatic life.
 Washington, DC:  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency;  1973.

 Koeppe, D.E.; Miller,  R.J.  Lead effects  on corn mitochondrial respira-
 tion.   Science 167:1376-1377;  1970.   (As  cited  by Bell et_  al.  1979)

 Leland, H.V. et_  al.  Bioaccumulation  and  toxicity of  heavy metals and
 related trace elements.   J. Water  Poll. Control Fed.  51(6):1592-1616;
 1979.

Lewis, J.C.; Legler, E.   J. Wildlife Managmt. 32:476-482;  1968.   (As
 cited by Forbes  and Sanderson  1978)

Lloyd, R.  J. Exp. Biol.   38:447-455; 1961.   (As  cited by Wong jet  al.  1978)

Luoma, S.N.; Bryan,  G.W.    Factors  controlling the availability of sedi-
ment-bound lead  to an estuarine bivalve.  J. Mar. Biol. Assn.  (U.K.)
 58:793;  1978.  (As cited by Leland et al. 1979)

MacLean, A.J.; Halstead,  R.L.; Flinn, B.J.   Extractability of  added lead
 in soils and its concentration in plants.   Can.  J. Soil Sci. 49(3):
327-335; 1969.   (As cited by Bell et al. 1979)


                                   6-26

-------
MacPhee, C.; Ruelle, R.  Lethal  effects  of  1888  chemicals  upon four
species of fish  from western North America.   University of Idaho,  Forest,
Wildlife, and Range Expt.  Stn. Bull. No.  8;  1969.   (As  cited by Wong
et_al. 1978)

Mathis, B.J.; Cummings, T.F.  Selected metals in sediments,  water,  and
biota, in the Illinois River.  J. Water  Poll. Control Fed.  45(7):1573-
1583; 1973.

Matthiesson, P.; Brafield, A.E.  Uptake  and  loss of  dissolved zinc  by
the stickleback  Gasterosteus aculeatus L.   J. Fish Biol. 10:399;  1977.

McNurney, J.M.;  Larimore,  R.W.;  Wetzel,  M.J.   Distribution of lead  in
the sediments and fauna of a small midwestern stream.   Drucker,  H.;
Wildung, R.E. eds.  Biological implications  of metals in the environment.
Proceedings  of the fifteenth annual Hanford  life sciences  symposium;
1975 September 29-October  1, Richland, WA;  1977.  Available  from:
Technical Information Center, USERDA.

Merlini, M.; Pozzi, G.  Lead and freshwater  fishes:  Part  1  — lead
accumulation and water pH.  Environ. Pollut.  12:168-172; 1977.   (As
cited by Phillips and Russo 1978)

Miles, C.D.; Brandle, J.R.; Daniel, D.J.; Chu-Der, 0.;  Schnare,  P.O.;
Uhlik, D.J.  Inhibition of photosystem II in isolated chloroplasts by
lead.  Plant Physiol. 49(5):820-825; 1972.   (As  cited by Bell ot  al.  1979)

Miller, J.C.; Landesman, R.  Reduction of heavy  metal toxicity to Xenopus
embryos by magnesium ions.  Bull. Environ.  Contain. Toxicol.  20:93-95;  1978.

Morgan, G.W.; Edens, F.W.; Thaxton, P.;  Parkhurst, C.R.  Poult.  Sci.
54:1636-1642; 1975.  (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson  1978)

Mouw, D.; Kalitas, K.;  Anvev,  M.; Schwartz, J.]  Constan, A.;  Hartung,  R.;
Cohen, B.;  Ringler, D.   Lead.   Possible toxicity in urban vs.  rural rats.
Arch. Environ.  Health 30(b):276-280; 1975.   (As  cited by Bell ^t al. 1979)

National Science Foundation (NSF).   Lead in  the  environment.   Washington,
DC:  National Science Foundation; 1977.  272  p.


Nehring, R.B.  Aquatic insects as biological monitors of heavy metal
pollution.   Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol.  15:147-154;  1976.  (As  cited
by Wong et al. 1978)

Ohi, G.; Seki, H.; Akiyama, K.;  Yagyu, H.   The pigeon as a sensor of
air pollution.   Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  12(l):92-98;  1974.
                                   6-27

-------
 Ozoh,  P.T.   Malformations and inhibitory tendencies induced Brachydanio
 rerio_ (Hamilton-Buchanan) eggs and larvae due to exposures in low con-
 centrations  of  lead and copper ions.   Bull.  Environ.  Contain. Toxicol.
 21:668-675;  1979a.

 Peterson, P.J.   Lead and vegetation.   Nriagu, j.o.  ed.   The biogeo-
 cnemistry of lead  in the environment.   New York,  NY:   Elsevier-North
 Holland Biomedical  Press;  1978.

 Phillips, G.R. ;  Russo,  R.C.   Metal bioaccumulation in fishes and aquatic
 invertebrates:   a  literature review.   Report No.  EPA-600/3-78-103.
 Washington,  DC:  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency;  1978.

 Pickering, Q.H.; Henderson,  C.   The acute toxicity of some heavy metals
 to  different species of warmwater fishes.  Air Water  Pollut. Int. J.
 10:453-463;  1966.   (As  cited by  U.S.EPA 1978)

 Pietilainen,  K.  In:   International conference on heavy metals in the
 environment;  1975 October  27-31,  Toronto,  Ontario;  1975:   C-279-C-281
 (extended abstract).   (As  cited  by  Wong _et _al.  1978)

 Portmann, J.E.; Wilson,  K.W.   The toxicity of 140 substances to the brown
 shrimp and other marine  animals.  Shellfish  Information Leaflet No.  22.
 Conway, N.  Wales:  Ministry  of Agriculture;  1971:   1-2.   (As cited by
 Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

 Quortroup,  E.R.; Shillinger,  J.E.   3000 wild bird autopsies  on western
 lakes areas.   J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.  99:382-387; 1941.   (As cited by
 Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

 Rolfe, G.L.;  Haney, A.   Inst. Environ. Stud.   Urbana, IL:  University
 of Illinois;  1975:   133  p.

 Schell, W.R.; Barnes, R.S.   Rubin, A.J. ed.   Aqueous environmental
 chemistry of metals.  Ann Arbor, MI:  Ann Arbor Science;  1974:   129-169.

 Siegel, S.M.; Eshleman, A.;  Umena,  I.; Puerner, N.; Smith, C.W.   The
general and comparative biology of  toxic metals and their derivatives:
mercury and lead.  Buhler, D.R. ed.  Mercury  in the western  environment.
Proceedings  workshop; 1971 February 25-26, Portland, OR;  1973:   119-
134.  (As cited by  Bell et al. 1979)

 Spehar, R.L.; Anderson, R.L.; Fiandt, J.T.  Toxicity and  bioaccumulation
of cadmium and lead in aquatic invertebrates.  Environ. Pollut.  15:195-
 208; 1978.

Tansy, M.F.;  Roth,  R.P.  Pigeons:  a new role  in  air pollution.   J.  Air
Poll. Control Assoc. 20(5):307-309; 1970.  (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977)

U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency (U.S.EPA).  Air quality criteria
 for lead.   Washington, DC:  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;  1977.
                                  6-28

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 1
 I
 1
 I
 1
 I
 I
I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Lead ambient water
 quality criteria.  Washington, DC:  Office of Water Regulations and
 Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1978.


 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Monitoring and Data
 Support Division Data Files, Office of Water Regulations and Standards;
 1979.


 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA).  Lead ambient water
 quality criteria for lead.  Report No. EPA 440/5-80-057.  Washington,  DC:
 Office of Water Planning and Regulations, U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency; 1980.


 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S.FWS).   Proposed use of steel shot
 for hunting waterfowl in the United States.   Final environmental state-
 ment.   Washington,  DC:   U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;  1976.


 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S.FWS).   Environmental assessment:
 non-toxic regulations for hunting waterfowl,  1980-81.   Washington,  DC:
 U.S. Department of  the Interior;  1980.


 Varanasi,  U.;  Markey,  D.   Effect  of calcium on retention of  lead in fish
 skin.   Fed.  Proc. Fed.  Am.  Soc. Exp.  Biol.  36(3):772;  1977.   (As cited
 by  Phillips  and Russo 1978).


 Warnick,  S.L.;  Bell,  H.L.   The acute  toxicity of  some  heavy  metals  to
 different  species of  aquatic insects.   J. Water Poll.  Control  Fed.
 41:280-284;  1969.   (As  cited by Kemp £t al.  1973)


 Weir, P.A.;  Hine, C.H.   Effects of  various metals on behavior  of
 conditioned  goldfish.   Arch.  Environ. Health  20:45-51; 1970.


 Weis, P.;  Weis,  J.S.  Effects  of  heavy  metals  on  fin regeneration in
 the  killifish,  Fundulus heteroclitus.   Bull.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxicol.
 16(2):197-202;  1976.


 Whitley, L.S.   The resistance of  tubificid worms  to three common pollu-
 tants.  Hydrobiol. 32:193-205; 1968.


 Whitley, L.S.;  Sikora, R.A.  The  effect of three common pollutants  on
 the  respiration  rate of tubificid worms.  J. Water Poll. Control Fed.
 42(2):R57-R66;  1970.


Wilkins, D.A.  A technique for the measurement of lead tolerance in
plants.   Nature 180(4575):37-38;  1957.  (As cited by Bell et al. 1979)


Williamson, P.; Evans, P.R.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  8:280-288;
1972.  (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)
                                   6-29

-------
Wong, P.T.S.; Silverberg, B.A.; Chau, Y.K.; Hodson, P.V.  Lead and the
aquatic biota.  Nriagu, J.O. ed.  The biogeochemistry of lead in the
environment.  New York, NY:  Elsevier-North Holland Biomedical Press;
1978.

Zitco, V.  In:  Andrew, R.W.;  Hodson, P.V.; Konasewich, D.E. eds.
Toxicity to biota of metal forms in natural water.  Proceedings work-
shop; 1975 October 7-8, Duluth, MN; 1976:  9-32.
                                6-30

-------
                         7.0  RISK CONSIDERATIONS

 7.1  HUMANS

 7.1.1  Introduction

      The preceding sections presented a discussion of the pathways of
 exposure and effects of lead on humans.  This section identifies the
 subpopulations at risk.  Section 5.2, which makes numerous assumptions
 about concentrations and consumption, describes exposure scenarios for
 certain subpopulations.  Although this approach is useful for determining
 the relative importance of exposure routes for different subpopulations,
 it is not generally useful for evaluating potential risk.  Because most
 of the observations of effects are correlated with levels of lead in the
 blood, measurements of such levels are currently the most appropriate
 way to evaluate potential risk.

      Given a large enough sample population,  levels of lead in the blood
 appear to show a log-normal distribution.   In certain cases, such as in
 urban and smelter areas,  this  distribution is shifted, which results in
 a higher percentage of the population with a  given level of lead in the
 blood.  In addition,  there is  a  wide range in exposure and thus  blood
 levels at which persons are affected by lead  depending on such things as
 age,  sex, and nutritional status.

      A summary of the blood lead levels at which adverse affects of lead
 have  been observed in humans is  shown in Table 7-1.   The lowest  reported
 effect level represents a value  at which only a small proportion of the
 population is affected.   However,  the U.S. EPA (1977)  developed  dose-
 response curves  that  showed a  sharp  rise in the sigmoid  dose-response
 curve for the percent  of  the population affected  at  only slightly higher
 blood lead levels.  The no-effect  levels are  somewhat  generalized and
 represent levels  at which  no effects  were  generally  observed.  However,
 recent  studies suggest  that subtle neuro-behavioral  effects  occur at
 blood lead levels  for which no overt  symptoms  of  lead  toxicity are  seen.

      Available studies  on  the carcinogenic and mutagenic  effects of  lead
 are inappropriate  for risk estimations.  Although human  data on  the
 carcinogenicity of lead are scant, no  evidence  suggests  that lead is
 carcinogenic  to humans.  A  few feeding  experiments with  rodents have
 resulted  in elevated incidences of renal tumors.  However, if these
 dietary  levels were extrapolated to humans, it would require consumption
 of 550 mg  of  elemental  lead per day, which is far in excess of the
maximum  tolerated dose of lead in humans.  Mutagenicity data are also
 inconclusive  and contradictory.

     Damage to the central and peripheral nervous systems and particularly
to the brain, damage to the kidneys, adverse effects on reproductive
capability, and the inhibition of the blood forming process are of con-
siderable concern.  Children, because of enhanced absorption and a variety
of other factors, generally exhibit the adverse effects associated with
lead exposure at lower blood lead levels (PbB) than adults.

-------
              TABLE 7-1.   ADVERSE EFFECTS OF LEAD ON HUMANS'
 Adverse  Effect


 Carcinogenesis

 Mutagenesis

 Impaired  Spermatogenesis

 Fetotoxicity

 Encephalopathy



 Noticeable Brain
  Dysfunction

 Peripheral Neuropathy

 Nephropathy



 Reversible

 Anemia
Elevated FEP (free
  erythrocyte proto-
  porphyrin)
Lowest Reported Effect
	Level	
  (ug PbB/100 ml)
         50

       30-40

     80—children

    100—adults


    50-60—children


       50-60

    40—children

    50—adults



    50-60—adults
    15-20—children
    and  women
    25-30—men
Elevated ALA (6-amino-           40
  levulinate acid) in urine
No-detected-effeet-Level
     (ug PbB/100 ml)

 > 40 occupational

 40-120 occupational

          23-41
    60—children

  >  80—adults


    50—children


          40
   40—children

   50—adults

   20—children  and
   women

   25—men

      < 40
ALAD (6-aminolevulinate
  dehydratase)                   10                       <  IQ


 Taken from data presented in Section 5.1.

 Note that recent studies suggest that subtle neuro-behavioral effects
 occur at blood-lead levels for which no overt symptoms of lead toxicity
 are seen.
                                  7-2

-------
      The first indication of lead exposure is the inhibition of heme,
 the prosthetic group  of hemoglobin responsible for oxygen transport.
 Inhibition of ALAD,  the enzyme  responsible for the synthesis of a pre-
 cursor to heme,  generally occurs  at blood  lead levels  below 20 ug/100 ml.
 Several other steps  in hemoglobin synthesis are also disrupted at PbB
 levels between 20 and 60 ug/100 ml.  Mild  anemia may occur in adults at
 or slightly above PbB values of 50 yg/lOO  ml and at a somewhat lower
 value (PbB=40 ug/100  ml) in children.   Although these  effects on heme
 synthesis are reversible,  the implications of prolonged exposure to these
 effect levels are unknown.

      Several studies  indicate that sublethal lead exposures (PbB=30-40 yg/
 100 ml)  may impair normal  reproductive  ability.   Alterations in sperma-
 togenesis are associated with lead exposure;  available data, however,  are
 limited to high  occupational exposures  (PbB=50-80 yg/100 ml);  therefore,
 it is  difficult  to extrapolate  to  more  typical exposure levels.   Absorbed
 lead also crosses the  placental barrier and enters  the fetal bloodstream.
 Umbilical blood  lead  measurements  indicate similar  levels to those  found
 in maternal blood.  However,  increased  sensitivity  of  the fetus  to  PbB
 levels  suggests  that  neurological  damage can occur  in  the fetus  with no
 overt  symptoms of lead  intoxication in  the mother.   No data suggest  that
 lead is  teratogenic in  humans.

      In  addition,  a major concern  is  the capability  of lead  to  induce
 irreversible  injury to  the  renal and nervous  systems.   Kidney  disease
 associated with  chronic  lead  exposure has  not  been adequately  studied.
 Routine  clinical  tests  are  ineffective  for early  diagnosis  and  irreparable
 damage  is  sustained before  chronic  lead nephropathy  is  detected.  Advanced
 lead nephropathy  results in hypertension,  interstitial  fibrosis,  and
 eventually  reduced glomerular filtration,  which progresses  into  renal
 failure.   Reduced glomerular  filtration occurs at relatively low blood
 lead levels  (PbB=48-98  yg/100 ml).

     Among  the most devastating effects of  increased lead absorption are
 the effects produced on  the central and peripheral nervous systems.
Manifested  as encephalopathy, effects on the central nervous system are
seen more  frequently in  children (PbB=80 yg/100 ml) than adults
 (PbB=100 yg/100 ml).   The minimal  level of lead exposure associated
with lead encephalopathy, however, is not  clearly known.  Effects of
lead exposure in the peripheral nervous system have also been documented.
Peripheral neuropathy affects motor neurons and are characterized by loss
of nerve fibers and segmental demyelination.  The lowest reported PbB
levels associated with these effects are 50-60 yg/100 ml.
                                  7-3

-------
      Perhaps  of greater societal concern are recent reports of subtle
 impairment of the cerebral function in children at PbB levels around
 40 ug/100 ml.   Many of these studies,  as discussed in Section 5.1,
 are controversial;  flaws in experimental design,  complications of
 nutritional and socioeconomic status,  insensitivity of behavioral tests,
 etc.  complicate the issue.   Despite the problems  inherent in these
 studies,  sufficient evidence exists to indicate that subtle neurobeha-
 vioral  effects  do occur in children exposed  to  sub-encephalopathic
 levels  (PbB=40-80 ug/100 ml) of  lead.   The minimal level  of lead expo-
 sure, duration,  and age of greatest susceptibility cannot be defined
 with  any  degree of  certainty at  this time.

      The  exposures  of  various subpopulations as indicated by levels  of
 lead  in the blood are  shown in Table 7-2.  Because the data on blood
 levels  are voluminous,  this table presents only a  few representative
 examples  and  is  not all inclusive.   The background information required
 for the interpretation of both Tables  7-1 and 7-2  is found  in
 Sections  5.1  and 5.2.   In addition,  the actual  exposure levels  that  may
 result  in the levels of lead in  the blood shown in Table  7-2  are dis-
 cussed  in Section 5.2.   Because  of  the  complexity  of the  toxicology  and  the
 exposure  pathways for  lead,  this section, which is  a discussion  on the
 risk  implications for  various  subpopulations as shown in  Tables  7-1  and
 7-2,  should only be considered in conjunction with Chapter  5.0.

 7.1.2   Adults

      In general,  food  is  thought to be  the major exposure route  of adults
 to lead (see Section 5.2).   The  total absorbed  dose  has been  estimated
 to be 10-25 yg/day  in rural  areas.   The mean blood  levels of  lead
 in these  areas  is around  10-ld_yg/100 ml  (see Table  7-2).   In urban
 areas,  when exposure via  inhalation is  more  significant,  total absorbed
 dose  is estimated to be  15-40  yg/day.   Mean  levels  of  lead  in the blood
 are about  15-24 yg/1.   Persons living near smelters  or other  lead
 industries are exposed to higher levels of lead (about 70-300 yg/day
as an absorbed dose), and a sizeable segment of the  population show a
blood level of greater than 40 yg/100 ml.

     Although Table 7-2 does not identify the isolated subpopulations
 that can be exposed to high  levels  of lead,  these have been discussed
 in Section  5.2.  These subpopulations include those  persons who  consume
 drinking water that is highly  contaminated resulting from the use of
lead pipes, contaminated moonshine whiskey, and excessive amounts of
 contaminated wines.  Of these population groups, the  first two are likely
 to be larger than the group  exposed  to lead through  contaminated wines.

     In addition, certain segments  of the population are particularly
 susceptible to lead exposure.  For  example, calcium  and iron  deficien-
 cies, commonly observed  in  pregnant women, place them  at a higher risk
 to lead toxicosis.  In addition, Calabrese (1978) noted that  individuals
with latent porphyria may develop clinical symptoms  when exposed to
 elevated  levels  of  lead.
                                 7-4

-------
        TABLE 7-2.  HUMAN EXPOSURE TO LEAD  AS  EVIDENCED BY BLOOD
                    LEVELS IN THE UNITED  STATES
 Location
 Adults

 Rural/Urban
 Urban
 Rural
 Within 3.7 meters  of
 Highway

 Living Near a.Smelter
 Children

 Urban  (primarily)
Within 30 meters of
Highway

Near Smelter—Kellogg,
ID—1974 (immediate
vicinity)

1975

1979
El Paso, TX
 Blood Level
 (yg/100 ml)


   9-24
 Most ^ 16
                                                      Reference
                                                   Bell et al.  (1979)
 18—mean (adjusted    Tepper and Levin (1972)
 for age and smoking)

 Less than 5% > 30

 16—mean (adjusted
 for age and smoking)

 Less than 0.5% > 30

 23—mean              Daines et al.  (1972)
   16% >40
 40,000  children  de-
 tected  annually
 >   30

 ^20 yearly geo-
 metric  mean

 50% > 40
99% > 40
60% > 60

Somewhat reduced'
Almost all < 60?
and most < 40

70% > 40
14% > 60
 Landrigan et al.  (1975)
Billick  e± al.  (1980)


Caprio et  al.  (1974)


Walter £t  al.  (1980)



Anonymous  (1979)




Landrigan et_ al. (1975)
 Reduction as a result of reduced atmospheric emissions as well as
 increased sanitary procedures for the workers who were apparently
 exposing their children to lead through their clothing.
                                  7-5

-------
      Thus, a relatively large portion of  the  adult  population  is  exposed
 to^levels of lead  that might result in  some inhibition  of  heme synthesis.
 Efrects on renal function and nervous systems are a potential  risk  to  a
 much smaller subpopulation and are limited, for the most part,  to occupa-
 tional exposure.   Impaired reproductive capacity has not been  well  studied-
 however, it does represent a potential  risk to adults.

 7.1.3  Children

      Children are exposed to high levels of lead in numerous situations
 (see Table 7-2 and Section 5.2).  Large numbers of  children in  urban
 areas,  in rural areas where lead paint has been used, near highways.
 and near lead industries show levels of lead in blood greater'than
 30 ug/100 ml.   Levels greater than 60 yg/100 ml are also not uncommon
 in children living in or near these areas.

      The fetus,  infant,  and child have all been demonstrated to be
 especially susceptible to lead (see Section 5.1).   At least to  some
 portion of the subpopulations described in the previous paragraph,
 current exposure levels  can result in anemia,  irreparable damage to
 kidneys and motor neurons,  noticeable brain dysfunction and encetmalo-
 pathy.

      Needleman (1980) discusses  the problems of lead in children in the
 United  States  today.   He  points  out that subtle effects on  such things
 as learning capacity  and  number  of synapses are being reported  at
 increasingly  lower  exposures.  The age  of  exposure  appears  to  be especi-
 ally important  in effects observed later in life.   Although studies  in
 this area  are  controversial  and  somewhat contradictory,  available  evi-
 dence suggests  cognitive  impairment and  behavioral  effects  in  children
 with PbB concentrations  consistently  over  40 yg/100  ml.   While  some  data
 indicate effects  below this value,  the  evidence  to  date  is  inconclusive.
 In addition, he  describes studies  that suggest children  who had apparently
 recovered  from acute  lead intoxication still showed  behavioral  disorders
 and sensory motor defects.

      Thus,  the preceding sections  and most  of  the authorities on the
 subject  (e.g., Needleman 1980, Mahaffey  1978)  suggest that  exposure  to
 lead still  represents  a risk  to children in the United States.   The
 phasing out of lead in gasoline, the elimination of  lead paint,  the
 treatment of existing  painted surfaces,  controls on  lead air emissions,
 especially  from lead  smelters, and  the reduction of  the  use of  lead
 solder in canned  foods are expected eventually to greatly reduce the
 exposure of children  to lead.  However,  the problem  will continue for
some time because of the existing contaminated soils and houses where
lead paint was used.

7.2  RISKS TO BIOTA

7-2.1  Aquatic Organisms

     Very few instances have been reported  of fish  kills attributed to
lead; however,  this is not a reliable measure of the risk that  lead poses


                                    7-6

-------
to aquatic organisms.  Chronic exposure to sublethal levels of lead may
cause subtle yet significant harm to aquatic ecosystems, particularly
in areas near anthropogenic sources of lead.  To assess the risk of
aquatic organisms with regard to lead, one can compare the concentrations
that have resulted in effects in the laboratory with those concentrations
that have been observed in the environment to cause effects.

     The ranges of lead concentrations causing sublethal and lethal
effects in various aquatic species as determined in laboratory studies
are summarized below.  The data supporting these conclusions are described
in detail in Section 6.1.

     •  <10 yg/1      Life-cycle toxicity test in soft water produced
                      abnormal development in rainbow trout.  All
                      other species tested are unaffected.

     •  10-100 yg/1   Sublethal effects reported for several freshwater
                      fish species in soft water, as well as growth
                      inhibition in sensitive freshwater algae.
                      Chronic  toxicity reported  in soft water  are
                      based  on effects on  early  life stages  in fish
                      and  life cycle  tests in Daphnia.

    •  100-1000 yg/1  Sublethal toxicosis  in a variety  of freshwater
                      fish and invertebrates in soft and moderately
                      hard water.  Acute effects were observed on
                      stickleback and  some  invertebrates.  Numerous
                      species of freshwater algae adversely affected,
                      as well as more  sensitive marine microflora.

    •  1.0-10.0 mg/1 Acute toxicity level for several freshwater fish
                     and invertebrate species in soft water and  for
                     sensitive marine invertebrates.  Algicidal  for
                     some  marine algae.

    •  10.0-100 mg/1 Acute effects observed in a variety of  freshwater
                     fish  and in most invertebrates tested.   All algae
                     species tested sensitive in this range.

    •  >100 mg/1     Only  the  most resistant species (e.g.,  red
                     shiner, mosquitofish,  cockle)  are  able  to
                     survive even  for short periods in  this  range
                     of  concentrations.  Hard water would be  impor-
                     tant  for  tolerance to such  elevated  levels.
                                   7-7

-------
     This summary  is  intended  only  as  a  general  guide  in the assessment
 of  the  ecological  impact  of a  given lead concentration in an aquatic
 environment.

     Surface water concentrations of lead included  in  the STORET  data
 base and from other miscellaneous sources are  summarized in  Table 7-3.
 The concentrations and their geographical distribution are discussed in
 more detail in Sections 4.2 and 6.2.   For at least  one year  between  1975
 and 1979, seven of the 18 major continental U.S. river basins  designated
 by  STORET have had mean total  lead  levels  exceeding 50 ug/1  ~ a  level
 indicating possible chronic toxicity in  some species (see monitoring data
 in  Chapter 4.0).  Of  these basins,  only  the Great Basin exceeded  this
 level in 1979.  Also, as  indicated  in  Section  6.1,  the levels  of  exposure
 increased in acidic or soft waters  as  a  result of the  increased availa-
 bility  of lead for uptake.  In general,  risk of  exposure  increases in
 basins with soft water, such as New England, the Pacific  Northwest,  and
 the Southeast.

     From the limited data presented,  it  appears that  the  ambient con-
 centrations occasionally reach levels  of  concern for most  aquatic species.
 Source-specific locations, such as mining areas or in  streams  receiving
 urban runoff, may achieve lead concentrations potentially  eliciting  sub-
 lethal and lethal effects in both invertebrate and fish species.  The
 U.S. EPA water quality criteria are exceeded in numerous  locations.

     Comparing monitoring data of lead concentrations  in natural waters
 and effects levels to aquatic organisms  in laboratory  studies, hox^ever,
 can be a problem.   Monitoring studies report total lead levels while
 suspended lead is  not generally a consideration in laboratory  studies.
A large portion of the total lead in natural systems is bound  to parti-
 culate matter (see Section 4.2).   Only conjectures can be made about
 the percentage of  bound lead and the role this  fraction plays  in lead
 toxicity.  Some potential for re-release to the water  column always
 exists, although Chapter 4.0 suggests that lead is tightly bound.   With-
out information on the ambient levels and distribution of completing
agents, such as organic and inorganic ligands,  suspended sediment levels,
changes in pH (resulting from spring floods, acid rain) and the influences
of industrial effluents on the dynamics of adsorption and complexing, no
estimates of actual or potential lead availability to biota can be made.
In addition, the role of ingestion of sediment  lead and its transfer up
the food chain is  not well understood.   The data have been presented to
illustrate:   (1)  the prevalence of ambient concentrations exceeding
levels  that have adverse effects  on certain aquatic species in the labora-
tory,  and (2)  specific situations  where lead concentrations occur  that may
have adverse effects on most aquatic life.
                                   7-8

-------
              TABLE 7-3.  CONCENTRATIONS OF LEAD IN WATER
                                                        Total Lead
                     Source	        Concentration
 STORET — Ambient levelsa

 7.7% of U.S.  minor river basins have a
 mean concentration exceeding this level                      50 ug/1

 8.1% of U.S.  minor river basins have 10%
 of  maximum concentrations exceeding this level              100 ug/1

 Miscellaneous Source-related Levels

 Mine wastewater,  Yukon  Territory                           1000 ug/1
 Boyle (1965)

 Settling pond, mine in  MO                                  1000 ug/1
 Proctor _ejc _al. (1974)

 Mine and creek waters in mining area,  U.S.S.R.       7000 - 9000 ug/1
 Edgington and Robbins  (1976)

 Stream near lead  smelter,  MO                                 300 ug/1
 (Gale  and Wixson  1979)

 Storm  runoff  wastewater  in Durham,  NC               100 -  12,000 ug/1
 (Chow  1978)

 Runoff  from streets  of high traffic  density
 in Oklahoma City, OK                                       5500 ug/1
 (Chow  (1978)

 Sewage  effluent in city with lead-emitting              100 _ 50Q u /-,
 industries                                                  ~      g
 (Chow  (1978)

 Sewage  effluent in Los Angeles,  CA                            250 ug/1
 Chow (1978)
3Data described in greater detail in Table 6-5.
                                    7-9

-------
7.2.2  Terrestrial Organisms

7.2.2.1  Mammals

     The risk of exposure to lead in toxic concentrations is apparently
greatest for relatively nonmobile species that live near anthropogenic
sources of lead.  Most studies on lead poisoning in mammals have focused
on rodents living various distances from a highway.  Clark  (1979) has
observed mortality in laboratory tests on domestic mammals at daily
doses of 1 to more than 10 mg/kg/day.  The same author estimated that
daily lead doses range from 1 to 128 mg/kg/day for wild rodents and
insectivores (e.g., shrews) living near highways.  Elevated tissue
residues have been observed in specimens living near roadsides; however,
there have been no reports of lead poisoning from this type of exposure.

     Robert and co-workers (1978) found renal inclusions and edema in
rodents living near abandoned mines in Wales, and attributed the effects
to high lead burdens (8-45 mg/kg dry weight).  Haschek and co-workers
(1979) examined rodents living in an orchard that had been treated
earlier with lead arsenate.  Several specimens had renal damage, which
the authors thought was associated with high residues of 14 mg/kgi
(dry weight) in the kidneys.  Soil concentrations in the area averaged
1342 mg/kg  (dry weight).

     Grazing animals, such as deer, may be exposed to higher levels
because they frequently forage near roads.  Some evidence suggests
that lead does not biomagnify in food chains (Williamson and Evans 1972),
although this does not necessarily imply that carnivores are not at
risk.

     Because the  relationship between tissue residues and toxicity is
not  clear,  it is  impossible to assess the risk to various species on
the basis of lead concentrations in  tissues.  Nonetheless, body burdens
do reflect  elevated exposure in  some areas and may be a measure of
potential risk.

7.2.2.2  Birds

     According  to numerous reports of lead poisoning in birds, the vast
majority of mortalities occurs in waterfowl as a result of  ingested
spent  lead  shot.   Yearly,  losses of  waterfowl  (from lead poisoning)
were estimated  at 2-3 million birds, or  2-3% of  the U.S. waterfowl
population  (Bellrose 1959); more recent  nationwide figures  were not
available.

      The risk of  lead poisoning  from shot ingestion is most closely
associated  with the hunting pressure in  a given  area.  Of  the  four
major flyways in the United  States,  the  Mississippi had 40-45% of  the
 total waterfowl hunting activity.  Approximately 25% of the hunter-days
 took place  in the Central Flyway, while  the Atlantic and Pacific  each
had  less  than 20% (Bellrose  1959).
                                  7-10

-------
      Certain species of waterfowl are much more likely to ingest lead
 shot than others, largely because of feeding habits.  Among several
 surveys of gizzard contents from bagged birds (U.S. FWS 1976), diving
 ducks had the highest incidence of ingested shot.  In this group
 canvasback, redhead, scaup, and ring-necked ducks appear to be at
 the highest risk because they have the greatest tendency to ingest lead
 shot.  Other species of special concern are waterfowl that consume corn
 as a major component of the diet.  These include the Canadian geese,
 mallard, pintail, and related species of dabbling ducks.

      In 1976, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service began a gradual
 phasing-out of the use of lead shot for waterfowl hunting.  By the
 fall of 1980, lead shot was completely prohibited for all types of
 shotguns in certain areas that account for about 20% of the waterfowl
 harvest of the United States (U.S. FWS 1980).   In states that have
 aggressively promoted the use of nontoxic steel shot as a substitute,
 some promising results have been achieved.   At the Sauvie's Island
 State Management Area in Oregon, 5000-6000 mallards perished each year
 from lead poisoning before lead shot was prohibited.   For several years
 after the regulation requiring steel shot,  mallard mortality as a
 result of lead ingestion decreased 25% per  year.   Officials'at Turk's
 Pond in Colorado reported a "pronounced change"  in goose mortalities
 after the use of steel shot became mandatory.   In Michigan,  lead  shot
 has been selectively prohibited.   Smith (1980)  noted  that 50% of
 the shot now found in waterfowl gizzards is steel.   From this evidence,
 it seems likely that the continued phase-out of  lead  shot will further'
 reduce the incidence of  lead poisoning in waterfowl.

      Other species of birds may also  ingest lead  shot  accidentally  during
 feeding.   Of  these,  the  species  with  perhaps the  highest  rate of  lead
 shot  ingestion  are doves.   In  an examination of doves  bagged  by hunters
 Lewis and  Legter  (1968)  found  lead  shot  in  1% of  the gizzards.  Aquatic*
 predators,  such  as ospreys  and  bald eagles,  are also at  risk  to the
 extent  that  they  feed on animals  containing lead  shot  (U.S  FWS 1980
 Bagley  and Locke  1967).                                              '

      Like  other  organisms,  birds  in urban areas tend to  have  higher
 lead  residues  in  their tissues  than populations in rural  areas.
 Possible sources  of  lead exposure to urban  birds  include  dirt  and air
 pollution.  The  ingestion of tailings  from  lead mine wastes has led
 to death in waterfowl on several  occasions;  therefore, the risk of
 lead  poisoning is probably  somewhat higher  in mining areas than other
 areas.

 7.2.2.3  Plants

     It is extremely difficult to relate effects data to exposure
levels  in order to estimate environmental risk for plants.  In
laboratory experiments, lead is usually presented as a salt in aqueous
solution or in vapor form (Section 6.1).  However, with these exposure
techniques, the observed effects levels are not equivalent to concentra-
^°™ av^lable for uPtake from soil.   For example, lead concentrations
of 30 mg/1 reduced corn seedling growth in a nutrient  culture, but

                                  7-11

-------
had no effect when present at 270 mg/1 in soil (Tornabene e_t al. 1977)
In field toxicity studies, the factors influencing biological availa-
bility are unknown; thus, generalization from the results to other
situations and conditions is impossible.
in «]?? 1t'S"tUre d06S n0t contain reP°«s of lead poisoning to plants
in field situations.  However, indirect effects on productivity (± e
delay nutrient recycling because of microbial inhibition) haJe been
observed within one-half mile of a lead smelter.
                                 7-12

-------
                                REFERENCES

 Anonymous.  Lead in canned food to be reduced.  Chemical  and  Engineering
 News 57(37) :20; 1979.

 Bagley, G.E., Locke, L.N.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  2:297-305;
 1967.  (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

 Bell, M.A. ; Ewing, R.A. ; Lutz, G.A. ; Holoman, V.L.;  Paris,  B.;
 Krause, H.H. ; Hammond,  P.B.  Reviews of  the environmental effects  of
 pollutants:  VII.  Lead.  Report No. EPA-600/1-78-029.  Columbus,  OH:
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1979.  476 p.  Available  from:
 NTIS, Springfield, VA;  PB80-12107 2.

 Bellrose, F.C.  Lead poisoning as a mortality factor in water populations.
 111. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 27(3) : 235-288; 1959.  (As cited by  U.S. Fish
 and Wildlife Service 1976)

 Billick,  I.H. ; Curran, A.S.;  Shier, D.R.  Relation of pediatric blood
 lead levels to lead in gasoline.   Environ. Health Persp.  34:213-217-
 1980.

 Boyle,  R.W.  Can.  Dept.  Mines and Tech.  Surveys.  Geol.  Survey Bull.
 Ill; 1965.   (As cited by Nriagu 1978)

 Calabrese,  E.J.   Will elevated levels of lead exposure precipitate
 clinical  symptoms  of porphyria in individuals with the latent condition?
 Medical Hypotheses  4:282-289;  1978.

 Caprio, R.J. ;  Margulis,  H.L.;  Joselow, M.M.   Lead  absorption in children
 and its relationship  to  urban traffic densities.  Arch.  Environ. Health
 28:195-197;  1974.   (As  cited  by U.S.  EPA 1977)

 Chow, T.J.   Lead  in  natural waters.  Nriagu,  J.O.,  ed.  The biogeochemistry
 of  lead in  the environment.   New York, NY:   Elsevier North Holland
 Biomedical  Press; 1978.

 Clark, D.R.  Lead concentrations:  bats  vs.  terrestrial  small  mammals
 collected near a major highway.  Environ.  Sci. Technol.  13(3) .-338-341-
 1979.                                                                 '

 Daines, R.H. ; Smith, D.W.; Feliciano, A.; Trout, J.R.  Air levels of
 lead  inside and outside  of homes.  Ind. Med. and Surg. 41:26-28- 1972
 (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977)
Forbes, R.M. ; Sanderson, G.C.  Lead toxicity in domestic animals and
wildlife.  Nriagu, J.O. , ed.  The biogeochemistry of lead in the
environment.  New York, NY:  Elsevier North Holland Biomedical Press-
1978.
                                    7-13

-------
 Gale, N.L.; Wixson, B.C.   Cadmium in forest  ecosystems  around  lead
 smelters in Missouri.  Environ. Hlth. Perspec.  28:23-37;  1979.

 Haschek, W.M.; Lisk, D.J.; Stehn, R.A.  Accumulations of  lead in  rodents
 from two old orchard sites in New York; 1979.   In:  National Academy  of
 Sciences (ed.).  Animals as monitors of environmental pollutants;  1979.

 Landrigan, P.J.; Gehlbach, S.H.; Rosenblum, B.F.; Shoults,  JM  •
 Candelaria, R.M.; Barthel, W.F.; Liddle, J.A.;  Smrek. A.L.;
 Staehling, N.W.; Sanders, J.D.F.  Epidemic lead absorption near an
 — smelter:   the role of particulate lead.  New Eng. J.  Med. 292:123-
    ;  1975.  (As cited by U.S. EPA 1977)
 Lewis, J.C.; Letger, E.J.  Wildlife Manag. 32:476-482; 1968.   (As cited
 by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)

 Mahaffey, K.R.   Environmental exposure to lead.  Nriagu, J.O.  ed   The
 biogeochemistry of lead in the environment.  New York, NY: Elsevier
 North Holland Biomedical Press;  1978:   Chapter 11, 1-36.

 Needleman,  H.L. ;  Gunnoe,  C. ;  Leviton,  A.; Reed, R. ;  Peresie  H •
 Maher,  C. ;  Barrett,  P.   Deficits in psychologic and  classroom perfor-
                                 dentine lea<* levels.   New Eng. J. Med.
 Needleman,  H.L.   Lead  exposure  and  human health:   recent data on an
 ancient  problem.   Tech.  Rev.  39-45;  March/April  1980.

 Nriagu,  J.O.  ed.   The  biochemistry  of lead in the environment.   Part A
 New York, NY:   Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical  Press;  1978.

 Proctor, P.O.;  Kisvarsanyi, G. ;  Garrison,  E. ;  Williams,  A.   In:   Trace
 substances  in environmental health  VII.   D.D.  Hemphill  (ed.).   Columbia,
 «0:  University of Missouri; 1974:57-61.   (As  cited by  Chow  1978)

 Smith, R.   Personal communication.  Migratory  Bird Management Office-
 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;  1980.

 Tepper, L.B.; Levin, L.S.  A survey of air and population lead levels
 in selected American communities.  Final  report.   Seven  cities study.
 Cincinnati, OH:  University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine-  1972
 (As cited by Bell et al. 1979)

 Tornabene,  T.G.  ; Gale, N.L.; Koeppe, R.L.; Zimdahl, R.L. ; Forbes, R.M.
Microorganisms,  plants, and animals.  In:  W.R. Boggess  and B.C. Wixson
 (eds.).  Lead in the environment.  NSF/RA-770  214.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency  (U.S. EPA).  Air quality criteria
for lead.  Report No.  EPA-600/8- 77-017.  Washington, DC:  Office of
Research and Development; 1977.   Available from:  NTIS , Springfield, VA;
PB 280 411.
                                   7-14

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S. FWS).  Non-toxic shot regulations
for hunting water fowl, 1980-1981.  Washington, DC:  U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 1976.


Walter, S.D.; Yankel, A.J.; von Lindern, I.H.  Age-specific risk  factors
for lead absorption in children.  Arch. Environ. Health 35:53-58; 1980.


Williamson, P.; Evans, P.R.  Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 8:280-288;
1972.  (As cited by Forbes and Sanderson 1978)
                                 7-15

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
            APPENDIX A.  NOTES ON THE DERIVATION OF TABLE  3-1
1.  Information on lead supplies were derived from the Mineral  Commodity
    Profiles for 1977  (U.S. Bureau of Mines  1977a).

2.  Consumption data are from Lead Industries Association, Inc. (1978), and
    from statistics compiled by the American Bureau of Metal Statistics
    (Kirk-Othmer 1967).

3.  According to Nriagu (1978), the following emission factors  apply  to
    the mining and milling of lead ores on a global basis for 1974 and
    1975:

                          mining     0.91 kg/kkg
                          milling    1.32 kg/kgg

                             Total   2.23 kg/kkg

    Assuming an airborne emissions capture rate of 50% for U.S. mining
    and milling operations, the effective total emission factor is 1.12
    kg/kkg of lead mined and milled domestically (517,897 kkg); this
    corresponds to an airborne emission for domestic mining and milling
    of 580 kkg.  To this must be added the airborne emission from the
    smelting and refining of domestic ore concentrates, a process for
    which Nriagu (1978) gives a worldwide emission factor of 6.36 kg/kkg;
    however, assuming an emissions capture rate of 75% in domestic
    smelting and refining operations in 1976, the effective emission
    factor for smelting and refining is 1.59 kg/kkg for which the air-
    borne emission would be 823 kkg.   Thus, the total airborne emission
    from the mining, milling, smelting, and refining of domestic ores
    is 1403 kkg.  The solid wastes that result from emissions capture
    are reflected in the solid waste emission level for the category
    of primary domestic lead production.

4.  Imported ores must be smelted and refined in the United States.
    Nriagu (1978)  assigns an emission factor of 6.36 to the worldwide
    smelting and refining of lead.  In the United States, some of the
    airborne emissions are captured;  and  if the emissions capture rate
    is taken to be 75%, then the effective emission factor is 1.59 kg/kkg.
    The amount of lead refined from imported ores was 78,909 kkg in 1976,
    which corresponds to an airborne emission of 125 kkg.

    The emissions that are captured,  75%,  are assumed to show up in the
    solid waste stream for the category of imported ores that are domes-
    tically smelted and refined, or 375 kkg.

5.  The airborne emission volume of 184 kkg associated with secondary
    lead production is derived on the basis of an emission factor of
    0.35 kg/kkg of secondary lead produced (U.S.  EPA 1974).   The amount
    of secondary lead produced was 526,060 kkg in 1976;  therefore, the
    air emission was 184 kkg.

                                  A-l

-------
                                                                             I



 No data are available concerning airborne emissions from battery
 production.  However, in the production of batteries, grids and'
 posts are cast, which may give rise to losses via volatilization
 (U.S. EPA 1975, 1976).  Material handling may also contribute to
 airborne emissions.  Using the emission factor of 0.5% (see note
 10)  of the lead used in smelting and casting, the estimated air-
 borne emissions from battery production is about 1700 kkg.  With
 regard to lead oxide used in batteries, airborne emissions might
 be associated with handling procedures, however, amounts are un-
 known; and, if the lead oxide is produced from lead metal, then
 emissions could be significant, depending on the amount of emis-
 sions capture machinery used to minimize emissions.

 Airborne emissions of lead used in gasoline antiknock additives
 consist of two components:   emissions  due to manfuacturing pro-
 cesses, which according to data compiled by the  Noyes Data
 Corporation (Sittig 1975)  was 1614 kkg in 1976;  and emissions  from
 the  combustion of  leaded gasolines,  which is taken as 80%  of the
 217,461 kkg of lead used in antiknock  additives  (Hepple 1971).
 The  sum of these two airborne emissions associated with antiknock
 additives is 175,584 kkg.

 Ammunition is  assumed to consist  primarily of lead shot  and small-
 caliber bullets that are steel- and  copper-jacketed.   The  airborne
 emission of 666 kkg is  based on an assumed air emission  factor  of
 1%, which is evolved during  the firing of  the round and  during  the
 impact,  especially in firing ranges  owned  by the military,  the
 police forces, and by private gun clubs.   Air emissions during the
 manufacture of rounds is possibly even greater than the loss during
 actual firing; however,  no data are available on which to  base an
 estimate.  The solid waste (land-destined)  lead  burden associated
 with  ammunition is assumed to be about 75% of the  total amount  of
 lead  used in ammunition; this is  attributed to rounds spent in mili-
 tary  and sport gun use where the  rounds are unrecoverable,  and to
 practice ranges where the  spent rounds are not recovered.   Losses to
 POTWs are considered to be  negligible; and lead  losses to water, if they
 occur at all,  probably  take  place during  manufacturing operations.

 Air emissions  of lead during  solder use are  estimated  to be  on the
 order  of  at  least  2%  of  the amount of  lead used in solder.    The
 loss  to  the  air  is  attributable to volatilization during the solder
 use,  especially  during manual use operations  as in plumbing  and
 electronics  repair.  Airborne emissions of lead during solder manu-
 facture no doubt take place but the amount is unknown  and no esti-
 mate has been made; also losses to the air during automated  soldering
 operations are probably minimal because temperatures are automatically
 controlled.  Aquatic  and POTW emissions of lead due to solder use
 are probably small, though the amount of lead going to POTWs because
 of solder use is probably greater than the amount going directly to
x^aters since solders are used extensively in plumbing systems
                              A-2

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
 I
I
I
I
I
      carrying water that ultimately goes to POTWs (though, of course,
      many plumbing systems carry water to nonPOTW sinks).  The amount
      of lead going to land as a result of solder use is taken as 10%
      of the total amount of lead used in solder and is assumed to be
      primarily due to the disposal of electronic apparatus and losses
      of solder during manual soldering use in plumbing and electronics
      repair.

 10.  Airborne emissions of lead during the production of weights and
      ballasts is attributed to volatilization losses during melting and
      casting.  The emission factor is estimated to be on the order of
      0.5% of the amount of lead used (20,286 kkg), or about 101 kkg.
      Losses to water and POTWs during production and use are unknown,
      but are probably an extremely small percentage of the total amount
      of lead used in weights  and ballasts.   Solid  losses to the environ-
      ment are attributed to the loss and disposal  of lead weights in the
      form of wheel balance weights and fishing-gear sinkers and are
      estimated to be on the order of at  least half of the  lead used in
      the weights and ballast  category;  i.e.,  10,143  kkg to solid waste.

 11.   Emissions associated with lead pigments  are based on  emissions
      factors taken from the cadmium production and use report  for losses
      due to cadmium pigment manufacture.   Emissions  during use processes
      are not known,  but  solid  waste associated with  packaging  disposal,
      plus  water  losses  associated with the use of  paints and pigments
      might be  at  least  equal  to  the amounts shown  below and in Table
      3-1.   The emission  factors  derived  from  the cadmium production
      and use report  (Versar 1980)  are as  follows (the  emission is
      based on  15,087 kkg  of lead used in  pigments):

               Emission Factor             Emission
                     (%)                     (kkg)

                Air       1.4                 212
                Water     0.1                   15
                POTW      0.3                   45
                Solid     2.4                 363

12.  Emissions resulting  from the use of  14,449 kkg of lead in 1976  in
     lead  cable covering  is estimated to be 0.1% due to rolling and
     handling processes during production, or 14 kkg.  Losses to water
     are unknown, probably small; and to POTWs the losses are estimated
     to be small because of the low solubility of lead in water.  Solid
     wastes are estimated at about 25%, due to the  replacement and
     disposal of lead-covered cable in commercial and residential
     applications; i.e., about 3612 kkg to land.

13.  Air emissions of lead during the manufacture of leaded brasses and
     bronzes are estimated at  about 5% of the lead  used.  (The high
     volatilization figure is  used because of  the higher melting tempera-
                                   A-3

-------
     ture of brasses and bronzes relative to that of lead.)  At 5% the
     14,203 kkg of lead associated with brasses and bronzes result in
     an airborne emission of 710 kkg.  Because lead is added to brasses
     and bronzes to improve machineability, significant losses would
     occur during machining operations, especially in small shops where
     recovery of metal scraps is not consistent.  Also, the rate at which
     machined brass, and bronze components of consumer goods are disposed
     of and replaced by new units, plus the solid losses due to machining
     processes, together amount to an estimated 20% of the lead used in
     brasses and bronzes, or about 2840 kkg of lead to solid waste.
     Losses of lead to water and to POTWs are probably negligible,
     especially during industrial and consumer use of leaded brasses
     and bronzes.   However, the manufacture of leaded brasses and
     bronzes might result in some amount of loss of lead to the waters.

14.  According to  the U.S. Bureau of Mines (1977a), lead sheet is used
     in radiation  shielding, vibration dampening,  and sound attenuation,
     the latter category being widely used in modern architecture.
     However, lead use in roofing and flashing has decreased,  which
     means that old buildings that are torn down might be a source of
     solid lead wastes.   Because sheet lead must be rolled during pro-
     duction, an air emission estimate of 0.1% is  reasonable,  so that the
     22.165 kkg of lead used in sheeting accounts  for an air emission of
     22 kkg; airborne emissions during use of lead sheeting is negligible.
     Because lead  sheeting is used in industry to  protect process vessels,
     especially in the handling of highly corrosive materials, some losses
     of lead are likely to result in a way that will reach aqueous media;
     however, data are unavailable on the amounts  of lead sheeting
     actually used by industry to protect its process vessels.   Generally,
     lead losses to the waters and to POTWs due to the manufacture and
     use of lead sheet are estimated to be negligible.   Solid  losses
     of lead due to sheeting are estimated to be on the order  of at
     least 10% of  the amount of lead used in sheeting,  i.e., 2216 kkg.

15.  Lead-alloy bearings are of the "plane" type that  operate  usually
     in a forced lubrication environment of the kind found in  automobile
     engines and railway car journal boxes.   Bearing wear results in
     losses of lead to the lubricant, which in  turn can be discarded
     to land, and  a small amount might be disposed of by incineration,
     thereby causing an  airborne emission of unknown magnitude.   The
     primary airborne emission assoicated with  lead-alloy bearings  would
     result during the manufacturing process, when it  is  estimated  that
     about 0.5% of the lead would be volatilized to the air.   Thus, the
     air emission  from the use of 11,848 kkg of lead in bearings is 59
     kkg.   Some emission of lead might result  to water  becasue  of  the
     manufacturing of lead-alloy bearing,  however,  the  amount  is unknown
     and the amount goint to POTWs during manufacure is estimated to be
     negligible.   The solid wastes of lead attributable to bearing  use
     is estimated  to  be  on the order of at least 80% of the amount  of
     lead used,  the rationale being that it  is  uneconomical to  recycle
     and recover the  lead alloy used in the  large  amount  of steel-backed
                                   A-4

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
      replaceable  bearing units;  the other 20% of lead use is taken to
      account  for  an increase  in  the number of lead-alloy bearing in
      service  and  in replacement  stocks.

 16.   The amount of  lead used  in  calking  metals was  11,315 kkg in 1976.  •
      Lead calking is still required,  because  of its corrosion resistance,
      in  the building codes of some locales (U.S.  Bureau of Mines 1977a).
      The manufacture of sheet lead and strips of lead for calking is esti-
      mated to result in an airborne emission  of 0.1% due to rolling and
      handling processes,  or a total emission  of 11  kkg.   Water discharges
      due to manufacture are unknown but  probably small,  as are POTW dis-
      charges.  Discharge  to waters and POTWs  during use can be taken as
      zero.  With  regard to solid wastes,  lead calking has been used in
      buildings for  a long  time,  the discharging of  lead from old buildings
      that are destroyed must  be  on the order  of at  least an estimated
      25% of the amount  used in manufacturing  in 1976,  or a total solid
      emission of  2716 kkg.

 17.   Lead pipes,  especially traps  and "ells"  (bends)  are still required
      by  the building codes  of some localities  (U.S.  Bureau of  Mines
      1977a) was much more  common because  of the ease of  fabrication of
      lead pipes and  fittings.  If  a conservative  estimate of 0.1%  is
      taken as  the airborne  emission factor for  the  manufacture (rolling,
      casting  and  extrusion) of lead pipe  fittings,  then  the manufacturing
      air emission of lead would  be about  12 kkg,  based  on a use  level of
      12,507 kkg of lead in  1976.   Losses  of lead  to  water and  POTWs  are
      unknown  and  could be a significant portion of  the  lead used  in  pipes
      and pipe fittings.  If the  disposal  rate of  old lead pipes  in
      buildings that  are demolished  is taken at  25%  of the amount of
      lead used in pipes in  1976, then the  solid waste volume from  lead-
      pipe uses is about 3127  kkg.

18.   Collapsible tubes are used  for the packaging of toothpastes, artists
      colors and corrosive chemicals (U.S. Bureau  of Mines  1977a).
      Because they are manufactured by extrusion,  a small  amount of
      airborne emission can be assumed due to high working  temperature
      and abrasion with the extrusion dies.  An estimated  emission
      factor of 0.1% means that the manufacturing air emission would
     be  on the order of 2 kkg (out of the total amount of  lead used
      in  collapsible tubes of 2112 kkg).   Emissions to waters and POTWs
      can be taken as effectively zero, as far as use is concerned because
      the tubes are not exposed to water very much during use, though a
     small aqueous discharge might be associated with tube production.
     All of the lead uses in collapsible tubes can be assumed discarded
     to land,  except for a small amount that might find its way to dis-
     posal by  incineration.

19.  The bulk  of  lead used in  printing type is used  by the newspaper
     industry  and  related industries where large volumes of materials
     must be printed in  short  periods; situations where photographically
                                   A-5

-------
                                                                                 I



     prepared plates of the kind used in off-set printing would not
     have adequate durability for printing upwards of half a million             •
     impressions.  Because "hot-type"linotype machines used melted               I
     type metal, some losses due to volatilization can be expected,
     and because the temperature is precisely controlled, it is likely
     that, conservatively, the volatilization losses would be no more            I
     than that encountered in the controlled temperature melting of              •
     lead in other automated melting processes, i.e., on the order of
     0.5%/yr.  Thus, the airborne losses of lead as a result of printing         I
     operations would be about 68 kkg/yr, based on a total lead use  of          I
     13,611 kkg in 1976.  Losses of lead as solid waste from the use of
     lead in type would be by means of spills, drips, and adherence of           •
     small amounts of lead to the disposable cardboard plates into               |
     which the lead is cast; an estimate of the losses of lead to solid
     waste streams as a result of floor sweepings and other loss pro-            •
     cesses is at least 1%, and probably much higher.  At 1% the amount          I
     is 136 kkg.  With regard to water losses, it is considered improb-
     able that much lead finds its way into the waters either directly           _
     or indirectly, however, because most users of hot-type printing             •
     processes are urban located, any lead losses that do take place             •
     probably go to POTWs, but in amounts that cannot be estimated.

20.  Terne metal is a coating of four parts lead to one part tin and is          I
     used to coat sheet iron and steel.   Because only 1447 kkg of lead
     were used in terne metal applications in 1976, the amounts lost to          •
     the media were probably also small.   Because industrial melting             p
     processes are well controlled,  the volatilization losses during
     coating processes would be small but probably not less than 0.5%,           m
     or about 7 kkg.   And assuming a disposal rate of 5% the solid               I
     waste burden from the use of terneplate would be about 72 kkg.
     Losses to water and POTWs are considered negligible because of the          _
     low water solubility of lead and because of the relatively small            •
     amount of lead used in terne metal.                                          *

21.  Baths of molten lead can be used in the annealing of certain alloys,         I
     The presence of baths of lead in a sustained molten state would be          •
     expected to account for relatively large volatilization losses,
     especially because the effective surface area for volatilization            •
     would be large as a result of the dipping and withdrawal of hot             |
     metal parts.   Therefore, a conservative estimate of volatilization
     losses from annealing processes is on the order of 10%/yr, or 262
     kkg of the 2624 kkg of lead used in annealing processes in 1976.
     Solid losses due to the adhering of lead to annealed parts,  and
     the subsequent losses of lead in ways that  it would be discarded
     along with other solid waste (e.g.,  as floor drippings,  and as
     flakings from annealed parts),  plus   the disposal of lead oxide
     scums that form on the surface  of baths of  lead, must  account for
     at least 20%/yr of the lead used, or 524 kkg minimum.   Losses to
     waters and POTWs is estimated to be  minimal.
                                   A-6

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
 22.   White  lead is  a term applied primarily to lead carbonate;  it is
      also used  for  lead sulfate  and lead silicate,  and the primary use
      is  as  a pigment in paints.   The amount of lead in white lead in
      1976 was 2715  kkg.   An  estimate that is considered conservative
      for losses as  solid waste due to the production and use of white
      lead is 2% due to  dust  losses that  settle out  and to losses asso-
      ciated with packaging disposal.   Because it  is likely that some
      packaging  used by  white lead manufacturers to  ship the product to
      paint  formulators  is incincerated,  a volatilization loss probably
      occurs.  Estimating the airborne loss at 0.5%  and the solid loss
      rate at 1.5%,  the  amount of  lead lost to air is 14 kkg and the
      amount lost to landfills is  41 kkg;  to the latter amount must be
      added  the  amount of painted  products that are  discarded, which,
      assuming a discard loss rate of  10%/yr minimum, the total  solid
      lead loss  rate to  land  is at least  312 kkg.  Losses to waters and
      POTWs  are  unknown,  however,  it is possible that upwards of 5%
      might  be lost  to aqueous sinks,  albeit in a  nonsolubilized form,
      because lead compounds  are not readily soluble in water.

 23.   Only 350 kkg of lead were used in plating processes in 1976.   Losses
      to waters  and  POTWs  would probably be  small  also,  however,  because
      of  the lack of data,  an  estimate cannot  be assumed.   Airborne losses
      are probably negligible, except  for  losses of  lead compounds  due  to
      dusting, which would probably  rapidly  settle out.   Solid losses
      due to plating would most likely be  in the form of discarded  lead-
      plated products, however, because of  the  lack  of  data,  the  disposal
      rate of  plated products  cannot be estimated.

 24.   The amount  of  lead used  in cast products was 6084  kkg  in 1976.
      Because  lead that  is  cast must be heated  to a  temperature  that  is
      somewhat higher than  its melting point, higher  levels  of volatiliza-
      tion losses can be expected  than would result  from other manufacturing
      processes  involving  the use  of molten  lead, as  in  the manufacture
      of ammunition, solder, weights and ballasts;  therefore,  the volatil-
      ization  loss rate is estimated to be at least  1% or 61  kkg.   Solid
      losses due  to spilling,  and  the removal of casting  flash, plus  any
      losses that take place with disposable molds  is at least several
     percent, which, along with the solid disposal of used cast  products,
     could be conservatively estimated at 25%, or 1521 kkg.  Losses  to
     waters and POTWs are unknown, but probably only on the order of
     several kkg.

25.  As with annealing,  galvanizing processes involve hot dipping in
     molten  baths of lead; thus,  the volatilization  loss rate of 10%/yr
     seems  a reasonable  estimate  and corresponds to  114 kkg of the
     1136 kkg of lead used in galvanizing in 1976.  Disposal of  lead-
     galvanized  products is taken at 25%  (which includes the lead losses
     due to  the  galvanizing processes, e.g., through dripping and spillage).
     Losses  to waters and POTWs  are considered negligible because of the
     relatively  small amount  of  lead used in annealing and because of its
     low solubility  in water.

                                  A-7

-------
                                                                                 I


26.  Losses of lead due to the manufacture and use of  lead  foil  are              "
     primarily to land, as a result of the disposal of lead foil wrapped
     hazardous materials as well as foil trimmings.  An estimated  air-           I
     borne loss rate of 0.1% due to the rolling of lead into foil  results        •
     in .an emission of 5 kkg from the 4649 kkg of lead used in foil.
     The solid waste stream is taken to consist of about half of the             •
     foil produced, or 2324 kkg, because the foil is assumed to  be used          I
     primarily for the packaging and disposal of hazardous  waste.  Lead
     foil is also used to package radioactive materials in  transit               •
     (U.S. Bureau of Mines I977a), and then it is discarded.  A  good             I
     portion of the foil is used to wrap low-level radioactive waste
     that is then sent for storage/disposal.  Lead loadings  to water             m
     and POTWs are estimated to be zero because of both the  small                I
     amount of lead used in foil and its low solubility in water.                ™

27.  The worldwide airborne emission factor for the combustion of fuel           I
     oils is, according to Nriagu (1978), 0.0091 kg/kkg.  The amount of fuel     •
     oil burned in 1976 was about 289 million kkg (U.S. Bureau of Mines
     1977a).   Therefore, the airborne emission was 2630 kkg.  Emissions          •
     to all other media as a result of oil combustion processes  are              I
     assumed to be zero.

28.  The combustion of coal, the production of iron and steel, and the           •
     smelting of copper and zinc result in substantial airborne emissions
     of lead.   Assuming a 75% emissions capture rate,  then 75% of the            «
     captured lead can be assumed to be a solid waste,  and the other             I
     25% remains an airborne emission.   According to Nriagu  (1978), the
     worldwide emissions of lead from these processes  are:

                Coal combustion              14,900 kkg                          •
                Iron and steel production    49,700 kkg
                Copper and zinc smelting     42,300 kkg                          •

     Coal used in the  United States  is  about  15%  of the worldxd.de value
     (U.S.  Bureau of Mines 1979);  and  only 85% of coal consumed  in the           •
     United States is  consumed as fuel  (U.S.  Bureau of  Mines 1977b).               |
     Therefore, the U.S.  emission of lead from coal combustion is:

          (0.25)  (0.85)  (0.15)  (14,900)  = 475  kkg  airborne  emission               I

     And the  corresponding solid waste  emission resulting  from airborne
     emissions capture is:                                                        I

          (0.75)  (0.85)  (0.15)  (14,900)  = 1425 kkg to  land

     For iron  and steel production  the  United  States uses  10% of  the               |
     worldwide production  or iron (U.S.  Bureau of  Mines 1978a).   Assuming,
     again, a  75% emissions  capture  efficiency overall, the  airborne  and           •
     solid  emissions of lead due to  iron  and  steel production are:                 I

         Airborne:   (0.10)  (0.25)  (49,700) =  1243 kkg                             —
          Solid:      (0.10)  (0.75)  (49,700) =  3729  kkg                             I
                                    A-8
                                                                                  I

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
     Copper and zinc production are actually handled separately by
     Nriagu (1978).  Worldwide emissions of lead from copper production
     and zinc production are 26,600 kkg and 15,700 kkg, respectively.
     The corresponding portions of the worldwide use of copper and zinc
     with the U.S. use in 1976 were 22.4%  (U.S. Bureau of Mines 1975)
     and 7.5% (U.S. Bureau of Mines 1978b), respectively.  Therefore,
     the corresponding U.S. emission would have been in 1976:

          Copper production:  6000 kkg
          Zinc  production:   1200 kkg

                 Total        7200 kkg

     Of the total airborne emission of 7200 kkg, the portion that is
     assumed to be captured in emissions-capture devices is 75%, which
     is assumed to be a solid waste.  Therefore, the total lead emission
     to land and air from the production of copper and zinc is:

          Air:   (0.25) (7200)  = 1800 kkg
          Land:  (0.75) (7200)  = 5400 kkg

29.  These data are derived from the U.S.  EPA MDSD's TABS DATA SYSTEM
     and only includes data points that are currently in the database.
     Consequently, these data are documentable, however, they represent
     a minimum estimate of source discharges.

30.  No data are available on the airborne lead emissions from the
     refining of petroleum; however, it is possibly significant because
     the amount of petroleum refined is very large.

31.  Airborne and solid waste lead emissions from the mining of coal
     are unknown, but probably small.

32.  According to the SRI (1979)  report on the agricultural sources of
     lead,  95 kkg of lead are contained as an  impurity in phosphate
     fertilizers.   The entire burden is assumed to  be applied to land,
     but no doubt a portion of runoff  exists.

33.  The estimate of lead discharges can be made based on preliminary
     effluent data compiled by Burns and Roe (U.S.  EPA 1980)  and (U.S.
     EPA 1977).   The usefulness  of such an estimate is only speculative
     at best because data are available on 9 POTWs  and effluent concen-
     trations of lead are variable (0-53 yg/1).   Removal efficiencies
     for lead in POTWs also vary,  although they seem to  depend, to some
     degree,  on the influent  concentration.  According to the U.S. EPA
     (1977),  the national POTW flow rate is 22674.694 MGD.   Based  on  9
     plants for which data are available,  the  average effluent  concen-
     tration is  19  yg/1 (U.S.  EPA  1980).   This  is a mathematical average,
     not a  flow-weighted  average.
                                   A-9

-------
      Annual discharge = (22674.694 x 106 ££i) (3 785 —
                                          day    '    gal
                         (19 x 10-9 ffls (365 days)


                       - 5.48 x 106 gms
                       =5.5  kkg

      Accordint to SRI (1979), sewage sludge contains between 15 and 1900
      mg/kg of lead.   The amount of sewage sludge generated in 1976 was
      3.6 million kkg.  The distribution of sewage sludge is as follows-
      254 is distributed to land as fertilizer;  25% is landfiLled- 15%
      is ocean dumped; and 35% is incincerated.   If the lead contained
      in the sewage sludge that is incinerated is assumed to be half
      volatilized and the other half stays with  the ash and is landfilled
      then the distribution of lead follows this pattern:

           Air:      64 - 955 kkg
           Land:     264 - 3683 kkg

      Loses to water  as a result of runoff are unknown.

 34.   These data  are  based  on information  on  one plant;  the information
      was  supplied  by the U.S.  EPA (1979).  The  identity of the  plant
      is unknown.   It is  assumed that this  data  point  is representative
      of all the  plants and that  all plants discharge  directly.

 35.   According to  the  U.S.  EPA (1975, 1976), approximately 200  domestic
      plants manufacture  lead acid  storage batteries and battery oxides.
      Recycling is  highly prevalent among  these  plants.   Virtually  all
      off-spec product  is processed as well as most of the  process wastes
      and expended  consumer materials.  Approximately  32-114 kg of  lead
      containing waste  solids  are process derived per kkg of product
      (U.S. EPA 1976).  Approximately 0.015-0.61 kg of lead/kkg of pro-
      duct  occur as waterborne waste (U.S. EPA 1976).  Based on 1972
      production of 889,000 kkg the wastewater discharge  of lead from
      this  industry is between  13 to 542 kkg.  However,  over 80% of the
      lead  subcategory plants discharge to POTWs (U.S. EPA  1976). Assuming
      this ratio is reflected in the wastewater flow, 3-108 kkg lead are
      discharged directly, and 10-434 kkg are discharged to POTWs.   Only
     about 30 kkg of wastewater treatment sludges are reported to  be
     disposed of annually.  Presumably the remainder is recycled at the
     plant and at a lead smelter (Versar 1980).   Thus, it is expected
     that land-disposed lead resulting from battery manufacture is
     insignificant.

36.  No data were available to estimate the losses to water, POTW  or
     solid waste from the production and use of  lead as a gasoline
     antiknock additive.  However, these releases are expected to  be
     small relative to the airborne releases from this source.
                                  A-10

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
37.   More than 90% of the lead content of ores is retained during
     beneficiation (U.S.  Bureau of Mines 1977a).   Assuming that the
     amount retained is 90%,  then the total quantity of lead contained
     in the ore from which the domestic supply of 517,897 kkg is
     recovered is:


             » 89 7    c-rr  / /i  11
               — =  575,441  kkg
     Thus,  the solid waste generated is the amount of lead that  remains
     in the ore tailings,  which is  the above amount,  575,441 kkg,  less
     the amount of lead recovered,  517,897 kkg,  less  the airborne
     emissions, 1403 kkg,  less  the  aquatic emission,  which is 175  kkg
     for both domestic and imported ore smelting and  refining;  this
     latter amount,  175 kkg,  can be proportioned between the imported
     and the domestic amounts of lead recovered  such  that the aquatic
     emission due  to the production of lead from domestic ore is on  the
     order  of 152  kkg.   Thus, the total solid emission from the production
     of domestic lead is:


         575,441  -  517,897 - 1,403 - 152  = 55,989 kkg
                                  A-ll

-------
                                                                                 I



                               REFERENCES                                        '


                                                                                 I
 Hepple,  P.  ed.   Lead in the environment.  Essex, England:  Applied
 Science  Publishers,  Ltd.;  1971.                                                  •

 Kirk-Othmer.   Encyclopedia of chemical technology.   Vol.  12.   New York
 NY:   Interscience Publications;  1967.                                  '          •

 Lead  Industries  Association,  Inc.   U.S.  lead industry 1977 annual review.
 New York, NY:  Lead  Industries Association,  Inc.;  1978.                          _

 Nriagu,  J.O.   The biochemistry of  lead in the environment.  Part A.              "
 Amsterdam:  Elsevier;  1978.

 Sittig,  M.  ed.   Environmental sources  and emissions  handbook.   Park              •
 Ridge, NJ:  Noyes Data Corp.;  1975.

 Stanford Research International  (SRI).   Agricultural sources of lead.            I
 Contract No. 68-01-3867.   Washington,  DC:  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
 Agency;  1979.                                                                    .

 U.S.  Bureau of Mines.   Mineral facts and problems ~ copper.   Washington,
 DC:   Bureau of Mines,  U.S. Department  of the  Interior; 1975.                     _

 U.S.  Bureau of Mines.   Mineral commodity profiles.   Washington,  DC:
 Bureau of Mines,  U.S.  Department of the  Interior; 1977a.

 U.S.  Bureau of Mines.   Minerals yearbook metals.  Vol. 1, minerals and           •
 fuels.   Washington, DC:  Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the  Interior;
 1977b.                                                                           •

 U.S.  Bureau of Mines.  Mineral commodity profiles, iron ores.   Washington,
 DC:   Bureau of Mines, U.S.  Department of the Interior; 1978a.                     •

 U.S.   Bureau of Mines.  Mineral commodity profiles.  Washington, DC:
 Bureau of Mines,  U.S. Department of the  Interior; 1978b.                          »

 U.S.  Bureau of Mines.  Commodity data summaries.  Contract No.  68-01-3867.
Washington,  DC:  Bureau of Mines, U.S.  Department of the Interior; 1979.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Background information         •
 for new source performance standards,  primary copper, zinc, and lead
 smelters.  Vol. 1:  Proposed standards.  Report No.  EPA-440/2-74-002a.            •
Washington,  DC:  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1974.                     I



                                                                                 I


                                                                                  I
                                    A-12
I

-------
I
I
              U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency;  1975.
  "        men^ SflS^'fVT*"1011 AgenC7 (U'S- EPA)-   ^aft-development docu-
           sta^dfrl1SUrh   ^mitat10^ Sidelines and proposed new source performance
           IanTS^fcal «™3  f*8* *** ^^ batteries se^nt of the machine rv
           and mechanical products point source category.  Washington  DC-  U S   "
           Environmental Protection Agency; 1976.            n"ieconf  UL.  L.S.


  I

  •
                              Washi"Stm' DC:  ^-S- Environmental Protection
                ^^n Production and us* °f cadmium.  Contract No. 68-01-385?
                on, DC:  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1980
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1979.


 •        POW ^i™"611"! ^ection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Prelircinarv data for

           E^roLtiai Prot-^ri^y^rGuidellnes  Division'- E-S-





 I



 I



 I



 I



 I



 I



 I



 I



I
                                       A-13

-------
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
                                                                             I
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency                                           |
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Flow                                          •
Chicago,  IL  60604-3590                                                     J
                                                                             I

-------