United States       Office of Water        July 1982
Environmental Protection    Regulations and Standards (WH-553)
Agency         Washington DC 20460
An Exposure
and Risk Assessment for
Benzo[a]pyrene and
Other Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Volume I.  Summary

-------
                                     DISCLAIMER

This is a contractor's final report, which has been reviewed by the Monitoring and Data Support
Division, U.S. EPA. The contents do not necessarily  reflect the views and policies of the U.S.
Environmental  Protection Agency,  nor  does mention of trade names or  commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
SO J72 -101
REPORT DOCUMENTATION '• "wow NO- *•
PAGE EPA-440/4-85-020
4. Title and Subtttta
An Exposure and Risk Assessment for Benzo [a] pyrene and Other
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Volume I. Summary
7. Authors)
Harris, J.; Perwak, J.; and Coons, S.
. Performing Organization Nam* and Addr*ts
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
20 Acorn Park
Cambridge, MA 02140
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
Monitoring and Data Support Division
Office of Water Regulations and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
3. Recipient"! Accession No.
5. Report Date
July 1982
8.
8. Performing Organization Rapt. No.
10. Proiect/Task/Work Unit No.
11. Contractor or 6rent(G) No.
(0 68-01-6160
(6)
13. Type of Report & Period Covered
Final
14.
15. Supplementary Notes
  Extensive Bibliographies
 ft. Abstract (Umlt 200 words)
  This  report assesses the risk of exposure  to  polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons  (PAHs).
  This  is  Volume  I  of  a  four-volume  report,  summarizing  an  analysis  of  16  PAHs:
  benzofajpyrene,   naphthalene,   anthracene,   acenaphthene,   fluoranthene,    fluorene,
  phenanthrene,    pyrene,   acenaphthylene,    benz[a]anthracene,    benzo[b]fluoranthene,
  benzo[k]fluoranthene,   benzo[g,h,i]perylene,   chrysene,   dibenz[a,h]anthracene,   and
  indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene.   This  study is part  of a program to identify  the sources  of
  and evaluate  exposure  to 129  priority pollutants.   The analysis is based on  available
  information from government,  industry,  and  technical publications assembled in  July of
  1982.

  The  assessment  includes  an  identification  of releases   to the  environment   during
  production, use, or disposal  of the substances.   In addition, the  fate of PAHs  in the
  environment is  considered;  ambient levels  to  which various populations  of humans and
  aquatic  life  are  exposed are reported.  Exposure  levels  are estimated  and  available
  data  on  toxicity are presented and  interpreted.   Information concerning all of  these
  topics  is combined  in an   assessment of  the  risks of  exposure  to  PAHs  for  various
  subpopulations.
 '. Document Analysis a. Descriptors
  Exposure          Effluents
  Risk              Waste Disposal
  Water Pollution   Food Contamination
  Air Pollution     Toxic Diseases
   b. Identlflers/Open-Ended Terms

  Pollutant Pathways
  Risk Assessment
  e. COSATI Field/Group Q6F   Q6T
                           Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
                           Benz[a]anthracene
                           Benzo[b]fluoranthene
                           Benzo[k]fluoranthene
                           Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
                           Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
                           Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene
                           Phenanthrene
                           Acenaphthylene
Pyrene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Acenaphthene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Chrysene
PAHs
.«. Availability Statement
  Release to Public
•MANS1-Z39.18)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
Chicago, IL  60604-3590
                                         19. Security Class (This Report)
                                              Unclassified
                                                      20. Security Class (This Page)
                                                           Unclassified
   21. No. of Pages
         53
   22. Price
       $10.00
                                                     «rse
                                                                              OPTIONAL FORM 272 (4-77)
                                                                              (Formerly NTIS-3S)
                                                                              Department of Commerce

-------
                                                EPA-440/4-85-020
                                                July 1982
AN EXPOSURE AND RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BENZO[a]PYRENE AND

       OTHER POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS:

                  VOLUME I.  SUMMARY
                         by

           Judith Harris, Joanne Perwak,
                   and Susan Coons
               Arthur D. Little, Inc.
            U.S. EPA Contract 68-01-6160
                     John Segna
                   Michael  Slimak
                  Project Managers
       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    Monitoring  and  Data  Support  Division (WH-553)
       Office  of Water  Regulations  and  Standards
              Washington, D.C,  20460
       OFFICE OF WATER REGULATIONS  AND STANDARDS
                   OFFICE OF WATER
         U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              WASHINGTON, D.C.    20460

-------
                               FOREWORD
     Effective  regulatory  action  for  toxic  chemicals  "quires  an
understanding of the human and environmental risks associated with the
manufacture, use,  and  disposal of  the  ^"1'£M??*O*r[£
requires a  scientific  judgment about the  probability of harm  to the
environment resulting from known or potential environment^ c«cetl«*;
tions.   The risk  assessment  process integrates  health  effects  data
(e.g., carcinogenicity,  teratogenicity) with information on 'xpoaura.
^'components of exposure include an evaluation of the sources of the
chemical, exposure  pathways,  ambient  levels, and  an identification of
exposed populations including humans and aquatic life.

     This assessment was performed as  part  of  a  program to determine
the  environmental  risks  associated  with   current  use  and  disposal
oatterns  for 65 chemicals  and  classes  of  chemicals  (expanded  to  129
"priority'pollutants") named  in the 1977 Clean Water Act    It includes
an assessment  of risk for humans and aquatic  life  and IB  intended to
serve  as a technical  basis  for  developing the  most  appropriate  and
effective strategy for mitigating these risks.

      This   document is  a  contractors'  final  report.   It  has;   been
extensively reviewed by the  individual contractors and by the EPA at
several stages of completion.  Each chapter of the draft was reviewed
by members  of the authoring contractor's  senior technical staff (e.g.,
 toxicologists, environmental scientists)  who  had not  previously been
 directly involved  in  the  work.   These individuals  were  selected by
management   to  be  the  technical  peers  of  the  chapter authors.   The
 chapters were  comprehensively  checked  for  uniformity in  quality and
 content by the contractor's editorial team, which also was responsible
 for  the production  of  the  final  report.  The  contractor s  senior
 project  management subsequently reviewed  the  final  report  in  its
 entirety.

      At  EPA a  senior  staff member  was  responsible  for  guiding the
 contractors, reviewing the manuscripts, and soliciting comments  where
 appropriate,  from related programs within  EPA  (e.g.,  Office  of Toxic
 Substances,   Research   and  Development,    Air   Programs,   Solid  and
 Hazardous  Waste,  etc.).   A complete draft  was  summarized  by the
 assigned   EPA  staff member  and  reviewed  for  technical  and   policy
 implications  with the  Office Director  (formerly the Deputy Assistant
 Administrator)  of Water Regulations and  Standards.   Subsequent  revi-
 sions were included in  the  final report.
                           Michael  W.  Slimak,  Chief
                           Exposure Assessment Section
                           Monitoring  & Data Support  Division (WH-553)
                           Office of Water Regulations and Standards
                                  111

-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures

List of Tables

1.0  INTRODUCTION

2.0  TECHNICAL SUMMARY

2.1  Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)                                          J-l
     2.1.1  Risk Conclusions                                       |J~J
     2.1.2  Releases of BaP to the Environment                     2-3
     2.1.3  Fate and Distribution of BaP in the Environment        2-6
            2.1.3.1  Transport to the Aquatic Environment          2-6
            2.1.3.2  Fate in the Aquatic Environment               2-6
            2.1.3.3  Modeling of Environmental Distribution        2-9
            2.1.3.4  Concentrations of BaP in the Environment      2-9
     2.1.4  Human Effects and Exposure                             2-12
            2.1.4.1  Human Effects                                 2-12
            2.1.4.2  Human Exposure                                2-13
     2.1.5  Aquatic Effects and Exposure                           2~15
     2.1.6  Risk Considerations                                    2-18
            2.1.6.1  Human Risk of Carcinogenicity                 2-18
            2.1.6.2  Human Risk Associated with Non-Carcinogenic
                     Effects                                       2-18
            2.1.6.3  Risk to Aquatic Organisms                     2-18

 2.2 Naphthalene                                                   2-19
     2.2.1  Risk Conclusions                                       z~1^
     2.2.2  Releases of  Naphthalene  to  the Environment            2-19
     2.2.3  Fate and Distribution in the  Environment              2-20
     2.2.4  Human  Effects and  Exposure                             2-21
      2.2.5  Aquatic Effects  and  Exposure                           2-22

 2.3 Anthracene, Acenaphthene, Fluoranthene,  Fluorene,
     Phenanthrene,  and Pyrene                                       2-23
      2.3.1  Risk Conclusions                                        2-23
      2.3.2  Releases  to the  Environment                            2-24
      2.3.3  Fate and Distribution in the  Environment               2-24
      2.3.4  Human  Effects  and  Exposure                              2~26
      2.3.5   Aquatic Effects and Exposure                           2-26

 2.4 Acenaphthylene,  Benz[a]anthracene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene,
      Benzo[k]fluoranthene,  Benzo[g,h,i]perylene,  Chrysene,
      Dibenz[a,h]anthracene,  and Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene            2-27
      2.4.1  Risk Conclusions                                       2-27
      2.4.2  Releases to the Environment                            2-28

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS
                             Continued

     2.4.3  Fate and Distribution in the Environment              2-29
     2.4.4  Human Effects and Exposure                            2-30
     2.4.5  Aquatic Effects and Exposure                          2-30

REFERENCES                                                        2_32
                                 vi

-------
                             LIST OF FIGURES

Figure
.. No-                                                              Page

 1-1       Structures of the Priority Pollutant Polycyclic
           Aromatic Hydrocarbons                                    1_2

 2-1       Sources and Fate of Benzo[a]pyrene in the Aquatic
           Environment                                              2-11
                                  vii

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES
 Table
  No.

  1-1                                                              Page
           Pollutant PAHs  ^^  °T Carcin°Senicity of Priority

  2-1      Est                                                      1~5

  2-2                                                              ^~^


 2-3      Sources of Benzo[a]pyrene to the Environment, 1978      2-5

 2"*      P^nt"0" °f A«-"-S»^-e Pathway for Benzofa]-

 2-5      Basic Physicochemical Properties  of  Benzo[a]pyrene      2-3

 2-6      Fate  of  Benzo[alpyrene in Generalized Aquatic  Systems    2-10


 "                                                             „
2-8
2-9
         Air
                                                                 2-17
                                viii

-------
                           1.0 INTRODUCTION
     The Office  of  Water Regulations  and Standards  (OWRS),  Monitoring
and Data Support  Division,  of Che U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
is conducting  a program  to  evaluate  the  exposure to  and  risk  of  129
priority  pollutants  in   the  nation's  environment.   The  risks to  be
evaluated include potential harm to human beings and deleterious effects
on fish and other  biota.  The  goals  of  the  program under  which  this
report  has  been prepared are  to integrate information  on  cultural  and
environmental  flows of  specific priority  pollutants,  to  estimate  the
likelihood of receptor exposure to these substances, and to evaluate the
risk  resulting  from such exposures.   The  results  are intended to serve
as  a basis  for  estimating  the  magnitude of  the  potential  risk  and
developing a suitable regulatory strategy  for reducing any such  risk.

      This report, comprised of four separate volumes, provides a  summary
of  the available information  concerning  the  releases,  fate, distribu-
tion,  effects,  exposure, and potential  risks of  the 16 priority pollu-
tants that are  polycyclic  aromatic hydrocarbons  (PAHs).   The  chemical
structures  of  these compounds  are shown  in Figure  1-1.

      The  number  of  chemicals  considered in  this  exposure  and   risk
assessment  is  appreciable.   The possibility  of  preparing  16  separate
exposure  and  risk  assessment  documents was  considered  and  rejected
because it would lead to considerable redundancy and because so little
information was  available  on  some  of  the  individual  PAHs.  As  an
alternative,  the 16 PAHs were organized at the  onset  of the work  into
 three groups,  as indicated in  Figure 1-1.

      The  rationale  for the organization into these three specific groups
 included   considerations  of  materials   balance,   chemical   properties
 related to  fate and environmental  pathways,  and  health  effects,  as
 described briefly below.

      •    Naphthalene is the  only  one  of  the  16 PAHs with  substantial
           U.S.  commercial production and  with a  significant  potential
           for  direct exposure  to  consumers   of  a  commercial  product
           (mothballs).  It is significantly more volatile and more water
           soluble  than  any  other PAH.   It was not  anticipated  to  have
           carcinogenic effects in humans.

      •    Anthracene, acenaphthene,  fluorene,  fluoranthene, phenanthrene
           and  pyrene  are all imported  in  rather small quantities for
           special  commercial  uses.    These  compounds  are  three-  and
           four-ring  PAHs,  with moderately   low volatility  and  water
           solubility.   The  question  of  their  possible carcinogenicity
           was  expected  to require careful review.  Most of the informa-
            tion pertaining to  this group is specific  to anthracene.
                                     1-1

-------
                            NAPHTHALENE
                                                                                     THE BENZOUJPYRENE GROUP
                     THE ANTHRACENE GROUP
I
NJ
    Phenanthrene
                          Acenaphthene
                           Pyrene
                                                                             BenzofaJpyrene     Acenaphthylene     Benz [a] anthracene
                                                                                 Chrysene
                                                                        Benzo[b]fluoranthene
                                                                             Benzo[g,h.i]perylene
                                                                                                        Dibenzfa.hJ anthracene
                                                                                                        Benzo[k]fluoranthene
    P

Indenof1,2,3-c,d]pyrene
                                      FIGURE M  STRUCTURES OF THE PRIORITY POLLUTANT

                                                  POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS

-------
     •    Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)  and the  eight  other PAHs  in  the  third
          group have no commercial production or use,  except as research
          laboratory standards.   They are  released to the  environment
          inadvertently  by  combustion  sources.   With  one  exception
          (acenaphthylene), the  chemicals  in this  group  have  very  low
          vapor pressures  and water  solubilities.   Several  of  the PAHs
          in the BaP group had been identified  as  carcinogens.   Much of
          the information regarding this group of compounds is for BaP.

     The exposure and  risk assessment  for  each of the three  groups of
PAHs was treated in a  separate chapter  of a multivolume report; Chapter
3.0  (Volume II) concerns naphthalene;  Chapter 4.0  (Volume III) concerns
the  anthracene  group PAHs;  and  Chapter  5.0  (Volume IV)  concerns  the
benzo[a]pyrene group PAHs.   These chapters are bound separately.

     Potential waterborne  routes of exposure are  the primary  focus of
these exposure  and  risk assessments because of  the emphasis of OWRS on
aquatic  and  water-related  pathways.    Inhalation  exposures  are  also
considered, however, in order  to place the  water-related exposures into
perspective.   Each  chapter  contains  major  sections  discussing  the
following topics:

     •    Information  on  environmental  releases of  the  subject  PAHs,
          including  the form  and  amounts   released  and  the  receiving
          medium at  the point  of entry  into the environment (materials
          balance);

     •    Description   of  the   fate  processes  that  transform  and/or
          transport  the compounds from  the point of release through
          environmental media until exposure of humans and other recep-
          tors occurs,  and a summary of reported concentrations detected
          in  the environment,  with  a particular  emphasis  on aquatic
          media;

      •    Discussion  of the  available  data concerning  adverse health
          effects of the subject PAHs on humans, including  (where known)
          the doses eliciting  those  effects and  an  assessment  of the
          likely pathways  and levels of human exposure;

      •    Review of  available data concerning adverse  effects on aquatic
          biota and  the levels of environmental  exposure; and

      •    Discussion of risk considerations for various  subpopulations
          of  humans  and other biota.

      Two comments  regarding  the materials balance  section are  appropri-
 ate.  First,  these sections were based in  large part on draft material
 prepared by  Acurex  Corporation, under EPA  Contract  68-01-6017,  and
 provided to Arthur D.  Little,  Inc. by EPA.  Second,   the phrase "mater-
 ials balance" is somewhat inappropriate when  applied to chemicals  such
 as  the  PAHs  that  are produced  primarily   as  byproducts  of  combustion
                                    1-3

-------
                                                               »th.r  than
   balance  production versus use and ~Vr       T* approach of trying to
   applicable  to these  chemicals md ^f0™*"*! release is  not  strictly

   tions of  these exposure and "isk a^ses^fV     J""*^  balance  --
   releases  from major sources such **Sess*ents are focused on  estimates  of
   is associated wii most of tSese StSS^™8 considerable uncertainty
  coverall11 l^p^^^ ^ T"" 7* rt* —ts
  chemical, benzofajpyrenef was i  of ««     ?'u,   W3S determined  that  one
  than were the  oti? 15 compounds  studied  V^^^ interest  tO  °^
  more extensive data base available for • aL        "terest  reflects  the
                ss
                                             ^^^
                         ..                              -
 (Volumes II-IV) .   The sumary is focused nyk    r V6  ""P""   3.0-5.0
 greatest Interest.  The estSated releases to^T'81^""6 a3 the PAH of
 mental fate,  monitoring data.  h™n  eff^-V.    /   enviro™el":.  environ-
 ed  exposure, and risk considerations con«J • '^T"'  bI°"C effec"
 expanded summary  for,.  Abbreviated   'Z™"8  *P  "* Pres«ted  in
 naphthalene,  anthracene
                                    t             ,                     -
without reference  to  the  se^ratelv I    f V"7  be read  and -nderatood
                                                  3
dram,  ,»d  more                                     ,

sources that were reviewed In thj ° course ^ of thl^ ? vcr^   ^  Ut«"«"
                                  1-4

-------
         TABLE 1-1.  SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE FOR CARCINOGENICITY OF
                     PRIORITY POLLUTANT PAHs
           PAH

 Benzo[a]pyrene



 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene



 Benz[a]anthracene



 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene



 Benzo[b]fluoranthene



 Chrysene



 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene



 Pyrene



 Fluoranthene



Benzo[k]fluoranthene


Phenanthrene
           Basis

 Positive oral carcinogen with
 other positive carcinogenic
 data.

 Positive oral carcinogen with
 other positive carcinogenic
 data.

 Positive oral carcinogen with
 other positive carcinogenic
 data.

 Not tested orally, other posi-
 tive carcinogenic or co-car-
 cinogenic data.

 Not tested orally, other posi-
 tive carcinogenic or co-car-
 cinogenic data.

 Not tested orally, other posi-
 tive carcinogenic or co-car-
 cinogenic data.

 Co-carcinogen or  initiator
 with negative carcinogen or  in
 vivo mutagen.

 Co-carcinogen or  initiator
 with negative carcinogen or _in_
 vivo mutagen.

 Co-carcinogen or  initiator
 with negative  carcinogen or _in_
 vivo  mutagen.

 Negative in a single carcino
 genie study.

 Several negative carcinogenic
and mutagenic studies but not
 tested orally.
                                   1-5

-------
         TABLE 1-1.  SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE FOR CARCINOGENICTY OF
                     PRIORITY POLLUTANT PAHs (Continued)
Anthracene                              Negative studies, tested
                                        orally.

Naphthalene                             Negative studies, tested
                                        orally.

 No data for evaluation of carcinogenicity were available for
 acenaphthene, acenaphthylene,  or fluorene.
                                  1-6

-------
                          2.0  TECHNICAL SUMMARY
 2.1   BEN20[a]PYRENE (BaP)

 2.1.1     Risk Conclusions

      BaP is suspected of being a human carcinogen, although  there  are  a
 number of limitations regarding the experimental animal data upon  which
 this conclusion is  based.  Table  2-1  shows estimates  of the  relative
 potential carcinogenic risks  (excess  lifetime tumor probability)  for the
 major BaP exposure  routes  determined  by using a  range of risk calculated
 using two  sets of  animal data  and three  dose-response  extrapolation
 models.   Although  these two sets  of  animal  data demonstrate  a  carcino-
 genic response to  BaP  in  mice  by the ingestion route, the quantitative
 estimates of human  risk must be treated with considerable  caution  since
 they are dependent  on  a number of assumptions  that  seriously limit  the
 degree  of  confidence  associated with   the  quantitative   human   risk
 extrapolations for  BaP.   Moreover,  there  is,  as   always, no  clear
 agreement  over  the   most   appropriate   model   for  performing   such
 extrapolations.   Additional  uncertainty   is  introduced  into the   risk
 estimates by the conversion techniques used to estimate human equivalent
 doses,  and by possible differences in susceptibility between humans  and
 mice.   Due to  the  use of a number of conservative  assumptions in  the
 risk  calculations,   the  results  shown  in  Table   2-1   most  likely
 over-estimate  the actual risk to humans.

      The  highest  potential carcinogenic  risks  appear to  be  associated
 with cigarette smoking.  For non-smokers,   the highest potential carcino-
 genic risks  are associated with dietary exposure to BaP (notably inges-
 tion of  charcoal-broiled meats and fish).  Inhalation exposures at  the
 upper end of the range in urban areas are higher than dietary exposure,
 but  the  estimates  are based  upon limited  monitoring data.   Drinking
 water generally represents a  less significant  source of  BaP exposure
 than the  diet  or inhalation.

      BaP  has also been shown to induce in vivo  chromosomal aberrations
 in laboratory  animals.  Because of this indication of mutagenicity, BaP
 exposure  could be  expected  to contribute to  the  genetic burden  of a
 population;  however,  since extrapolation  procedures  for  genetic risks
 have  not been well established, a quantitative risk assessment for these
 kinds  of  adverse  health  effects   is  not presently  feasible.   Little
 information is available on other health effects  of BaP.

     No conclusions  could  be  drawn as to  the  risk to biota  associated
with  BaP  exposure   due to the  lack  of  information  regarding  effects.
 Similarly, no water quality criterion for  aquatic  life has  been  set for
 this compound.
                                    2-1

-------
                             TABLE  2-1,  ESTIMATED RANGES OF CARCINOGENIC RISK TO HUMANS DUE
                                         TO BENZO[a]PYRENE EXPOSURE FOR VARIOUS ROUTES
                Route
     Typical Diet
Average Lifetime
  BaP Exposure    Size of Exposed  Estimated Lifetime Excess  Estimated Incidence
                    Population      Probability of Cancer3   (excess cancers/year)
  0.05
221 x 10
4 x 10~6  to 6 x 10"4
                                                                                                    13 - 1,900
     Drinking Water
  0.0006
221 x 10
1 x 10"10 to 7 x 10 6
                                                                                                  « 1 -  22
to
to
     Ambient  Air  -  Urban
                -  Rural
     Smoking
  0.02 - 2

  0.0002 -  0.2


  0.6b
                                                      166 x 10
                                                       55 x 10
 54 x 10
                                                              6
                      -7           -2
                6 x 10    to 4 x 10

                3 x 10~U to 3 x 10~3
3 x 10~4  to 1 x 10~2
   1  -  95,000

« 1  -  2,400


 230  -  7,700
     A  range of probability is given, based on several different dose-response extrapolation models.  The
     i^k r^ T ?MJ /r°babillty ,°f c*ncer "presents the increase in probability of cancer over the normal
     background incidence, assuming that an individual is continuously exposed to BaP at the indicated
     dally intake over a 70-year lifetime.  There is considerable variation in the estimated risk due to
     uncertainty introduced by the use of laboratory rodent data, by the conversion to equivalent human
     dosage  and by the application of hypothetical dose-response curves.  In view of several conservative
                      W6re Utlll2ed' 1C 1S llkel* that these Predictions overestimate the actual risk
     a hgher   ily exposure
                                   P°pUlation °f smokers <54 mllll°n) «»oked on average 25 cigarettes per
                                                           Ci^rettes P« **> andH^quently may receive
     Source:  Data taken from Volume IV of this report.

-------
2.1.2  Releases of BaP to the Environment

     Combustion is  the major  source of  environmental loading  of BaP.
Residential heating is the single largest combustion source, since_ these
emissions are  largely  uncontrolled.   Table  2-2 summarizes the estimates
of BaP  releases  from these sources  and  the emission  factors  that were
used in the calculation.

     BaP is also released to the environment as a result of its presence
in  petroleum- and  coal-derived oils,  fuels,  and  solvents.   Coal  tar
production and distillation released an estimated  total  of about 4 kkg
BaP  in 1978.2  Creosote  oil is used in the  wood  preserving industry;
however, less  than 1 kkg BaP has been estimated to be  released from this
source  in 1978 (U.S. EPA 1979a).

     Publicly-Owned  Treatment  Works  (POTWs) also represent a source  of
BaP  releases  to  the  environment.   The volume  of  releases  is  largely
dependent  upon variations  in   industrial disclwrges   to  POTWs    On the
basis  of  a  total  POTW flow of  approximately 1011 I/day (U.S. EPA 1978a)
and  average  BaP  concentrations of 0.1 yg/1  in the  influent (it  was not
detected  in  the  effluent),  the environmental releases can  be estimated.
The  total environmental loading of  BaP  from this source was calculated
to  be 3.7 kkg/yr.   The  amount  contained in sludge  was calculated to  be
less than 1  kkg,  assuming  6.0 x  10° kkg  dry sludge produced  annually
 (U.S.  EPA 1976- and a concentration of 3.9 yg/kg in the sludge  (U.S. EPA
 1980a).  The difference between the total environmental  loading  and the
BaP in the sludge was allocated as  an atmospheric  release. However,  an
unknown fraction of this 3.7  kkg  may  in  fact be present in the  POTW
 effluent at  concentrations  too low to be detected.

      Table 2-3 summarizes the  releases of BaP to  the  environment includ-
 ing those from combustion  and other sources.  Considerable  uncertainty
 is  associated with  all of  these  release estimates.  BaP  is largely a
 combustion product  or  present  at  low levels  in coal  tar and  petroleum.
 Since this compound is not directly produced, the base of information  on
 which  to apply emission factors does not exist.  There  are very limited
 monitoring data, and  the  representativeness of the emission  factors_is
 unknown.  Therefore,  these estimates should be viewed as  an indication
 of  the relative  magnitude of  BaP  releases to the environment   compared
 with  other  compounds,  and  for identifying  roughly the  sources  that are
 important.
    ese estimates were developed by Acurex, Inc. for EPA under Contract
  No. 68-01-6017.  Their data are summarized in Volume IV of this report,

  2See footnote  1.
                                     2-3

-------
         TABLE 2-2.   ESTIMATED  ANNUAL AIR EMISSIONS  OF  BENZO[a]PYRENE FROM
                         COMBUSTION SOURCES,  1978
              Source
                                      Emission Factor
 Residential Coal Combustion       0.0015 g/kg

 Fireplaces                        0.0008 g/kg

 Primary Residential Wood Heating   0.004 g/kg

 Auxiliary Residential Wood Heating 0.004 g/kg

 Prescribed Burning                0.740 mg/kg (dry  fuel)
 Wildfire


 Agricultural Burning


 Gasoline




 Tire Wear
0.740 mg/kg (dry fuel)


0.740 mg/kg (dry fuel)


  8 yg/mile
                                                              Amount Combusted
       3.9xl06 kkg

       2.9xl06 kkg

       6.9xl06 kkg

       9.2xl06 kkg

  36xl06 kkg (dry  wt.)


   2x10'  kkg (dry  wt.)
  13x10  kkg (dry wt.)
     1.7x10  miles
      traveled, 67Z
   Emission reduction
Estimated  Releases
       (kkg)

        10

          2

        30

        40

        30


        20


        10
                                                            10
Utility Boilers - Coal
                  Oil

Incinerators
Coal Refuse Pile

Cigarettes
           b
           b

0.04 ug/kg refuse
0.005 kg/kg POM

0.01 ug/cigarette
       4.8x10^ kkg
       7.8x10  kkg

 municipal - 385 kkg/day
commerical - 8xl06 kkg/yr
                                                             6.2xlOcigarettes
                                   < 1
                                                                                         Total  159
   SL      12
    1.7x10   miles traveled, 0.19  g/vehicle mile airborne particulates,
    0.15 g/vehicle-mile is deposited  on road surface, rubber  -  33Z carbon
    black,  17  ug BaP/g carbon black.

    Described  in Volume IV of this Report.

    190x10   m refuse pile volume  (21Z burning), dansity 1.5  kkg/m3
    POM emission rate of 1.3xlO~8  kg/kkg-hr.

Source:   Acurex  Materials  Balance - Draft Report  prepared under Contract So. 68-01-6017.  Data summarized
                in Volume  IV of this  report.
                                                 2-4

-------
  TABLE  2-3.    SOURCES  OF  BENZO[a]PYRENE  TO  THE  ENVIRONMENT,  1978
Source
                        Air
                                      Release (kkg)
Water
                                                 POTW
                           Land
Combustion
                        160
Coal tar production
                                     0.7
             0.9
                                                               0.6
POTW
                                 not detected
                                                              <1
     TOTAL
                        166
 0,7
0,9
                                                              <2
 Source:  Acurex.  Materials Balance - Draft Report Prepared under
         Contract No. 68-01-6017.  Data Summarized in Volume IV of
         this Report.
                                   2-5

-------
                                                                     »

      of  the  U.S.  is  surface  water  l',  t-  ^^ely  2%  of the total
 directly deposited  on  inUnd sur'fi.    ^  P* Ba? annually would be
 additional  amount would eventuallv  „  vT"  t™  ^ atmosP*«e.   An
 runoff,  although  the total is l«i£t.T^ ^ *" ?"'"  V±a  SUrface
 The effect on  water  bodies near ^  t      l6SS than  l kk§ Annually.
 cant.  The  BaP  reLininl in the t,    ? S°UrC<2S may be more signifL
 photolyzed.  HoweveT a  thorough    atl"osPhere i«  likely to  be  rapidly
 these compounds
2>1'3'2  late in the Aquatic Environment.
 The
 volatilization froi surface
 this compound.   In fact   ,
 been measured  In  a  simulated
 Calculated half -lives       '
 hours_to 700  hours,
                                                                     --
                                                  «ns"nt  s"8gest  that
                                                   ^P0"31": P«h»ay for
                                                -life, of «0- hours  has
                                                     (Southwo«h- 1979) .
                                                        that BaP in  the
1979) have  suggested  that direct
                                           t       ,
                                          "Si   1978>  NAS  1972-
al. 1978).


factorf up8
signifies
                                 in the presence of humic acid (Smith
                                                                     et
                                 2-6

-------
           TABLE  2-4.    EVALUATION OF AIR-TO-SURFACE PATHWAY
                        FOR BENZO[a]PYRENE
                                                             Near
                                                          Combustion
                                  Rural         Urban       Source
               ^
          yg/in  (air)
Percent of atmospheric
  emissions deposited
    - dry deposition             22              19
    - wet deposition              4              4-7
    - total                      26             23-26
 Depends on the proximity to a combustion source.
Source:  Data taken from Volume IV of this report.
Fraction of airborne mass
  adsorbed on particulate         0.99
Dry deposition velocity
   (cm/sec)
Precipitation scavenging
  ratio:                        6x10            6x10       1.2x10

                (water)
                                  2-7

-------
TABLE 2-5.   BASIC PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF BENZO[a]PYRENE
    Formula                  C20H12
    Molecular Weight           252.32


    Melting Point              179 "C


    Vapor  Pressure            5,6 x 10"9  torr  at  25°C


    Water  Solubility          0.0038  mg/1 at 25°C


    Log octanol/water
     Partition Coefficient   6,08 at 25°C


    Henry's Law Constant      4.89 x  10~7 atm nfVmole at 25°C
   Source:  SRI (1980); Versar, Inc. (1979).
                                2-8

-------
 bioaccumulation  is not  expected to be a significant loss mechanism  from
 water.   In addition,  microbial degradation  does not  appear  to  be an
 important  fate  process for  BaP (Gardner et_  al.  1979, Lu  et al. 1977,
 Schwall and Herbes 1978).

 2.1.3.3  Modeling of Environmental Distribution

      The Mackay  equilibrium partitioning model (Mackay 1979) was used to
 estimate the  partitioning of BaP  in  the  environment.   This application
 is  described  in Volume IV of  this  report.   The results  suggest  that
 99.9%  of  the BaP  introduced  into the air-water sediment  system  will
 reside in  the sediment  compartment.   Less than 0.1% will  be present in
 the  water  column,  and  less  than 0.001% will  be  partitioned  to  the
 atmosphere.

      The U.S.  EPA EXAMS model (U.S. EPA 1980b) was also used to estimate
 BaP fate in aquatic systems using  a loading rate  of  0.1 kg/hour.  Table
 2-6 summarizes the fate of BaP in generalized aquatic systems modeled by
 EXAMS.  The ultimate fate of BaP in these  systems is controlled primar-
 ily by chemical  processes in the static systems,  and physical transport
 beyond the system boundaries for the  river systems.   The  persistence of
 BaP in aquatic  systems is reflected  in the  time  for  self-purification
 predicted by  EXAMS.   The  necessary time for  removal of 97%  of  the  BaP
 accumulated in the turbid river system was estimated  as 89 days,  while
 the  analogous self-purification   time  predicted  for  the" static  pond
 system was  as  high as 69 years.

	   Figure 2-1  summarizes  the major inputs  of BaP to  the  aquatic
 environment,  as  well  as the dominant fate  and  transport pathways.

 2.1.3.4  Concentrations of BaP  in the  Environment

      BaP  has  been  monitored   in  environmental  media.   Most  of  the
 observations  reported in  STORET  (the  U.S.  EPA water quality  data  base)
 are below the detection limits, which  are generally  10  yg/1.   Data from
 other sources  indicate that BaP  levels in waters are  generally less than
 1  yg/1 and  commonly less than 0.01  ug/1 (White and Vanderslice 1980).

      Reported  levels  of BaP in  sediment are much  higher than  in water.
 In the STORET data base,  levels up to 1,400  yg/kg have been  recorded,
 although  only 11 of  125  observations  were  above the detection  limit
 (often greater than  1,000 ug/kg) (U.S. EPA 1980c).  Hites &t_ al.  (1977)
 reported  a  high  level of  8,000  yg/kg  BaP  (dry weight)  in sediment from
 the Charles  River  in  Massachusetts.   Concentrations  in  urban  soils
 appear to be about two  orders of magnitude higher  than  concentrations in
 rural  soil  (White and Vanderslice 1980).

     Concentrations of  BaP in drinking water  are reported to range from
 0.2 ng/1  to 1.6  ng/1,  with the highest reported BaP concentration  found
 in drinking water from New Orleans, LA (Basu and Saxena 1978).
                                   2-9

-------
to
                                    TABLE 2-6.   FATE OF BENZO [a] PYRENE IN  GENERALIZED AQUATIC SYSTEMS3
                              Percent Distribution
Percent Lost by Various Processes


Residing in
Water at
System Steadv-State
Pond
Eutrophic Lake
01 igotrophic Lake
River
Turbid River
Coastal River
0.24
1.85
18.75
2.17
5.63
0.56

Residing in
Sediment at
Steady-State
99.76
98.15
81.25
97.83
94.37
99.44
Transformed
Transformed by
by Chemical Biological
Process Process
68.79 0
95.10 0.05
99.97 0
0.04 0
0 0
2.89 0

Lost
by Other
Volatilized Processes
0.16 31.03
0.21 4.64
0.02 0.01
0 99.96b
0 lOOb
0.02 97.08b

Time for
System Self-
Purification0
69 years
25 years
393 days
95 days
89 days
376 days
           All data simulated by the EXAMS model (U.S. EPA 1980b).
           Primarily loss through physical transport beyond system boundaries.

          "Estimate for removal of ca. 97% of the toxicant accumulated in system.  Estimated from the results  of
           the half-lives for the toxicant in bottom sediment and water columns, with overall cleansing time
           weighted according to the pollutant's initial distribution.
          Source:  Data taken from Volume IV of  this  report.

-------
 Direct Discharge
               »>
Neg. % env. releases
                                                                         AIR

                                                     100 % env. releases, 180 kkg/yr.
                                                     (rapid photolysis. t,/a 5-10 hrs.)
                                                        Atmospheric Deposition
                                                       23-26 % airborne load.
                                                              47 kkg/yr.
                                                                to U.S.
                                                             inland waters
                                                             < 1 kkg/yr.
                                                                       to U.S. land mass
                                                                                "v/47 kkg/yr.
      Volatilization
         (slow)
\\\V      ti/ "v 1
 •XjJ- Photolysis
         (fast)
         tya<10hrs.
                                        Oxidation
                                           tyj10.
                                           (limited by concentration of oxidants)
                                        Sorption    log KraA, = 6.08 (fast)

                                                  — ..,....                 Physical
                            Desorpt,on ^             ,v;:.  —_____^ Transport
                           (slow and
                           continuous)   \               \Sedimentation
                            FIGURE 2-1
                                            SOURCES AND FATE OF BENZOla] PYRENE IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

-------
  ported to range from 0.
         16  observations  were


  2-1.4   Human  Effects  and

  2.1.4.1  Human Effects
                                  to l      /    r,       J >»v. been  re-
                              tested  for  its  carcinogenic  effects.   In
         ~~ ""••*  w=cu suown co be both a ln/».»i  -,„->     *.   .      »-«-vo.   j.u
 oral,  dermal,  and  intratracheal  routes     Th   SyStemic  «rclnogen by
 transplacental  carcinogen   an  ±niti£   V  ,,     "mpound  is  also  a
 and  carcinogenic  in  sin'2ltHn«        f£ Skin carcinogenesis  in mice,
 _         "^e-^iij-w  iu  singxe—dose  experiments  ('TARP  1070   n
 Compounds which have been  TV *• A f    r    s;"1-0  VJ.A«.V-  ly/zj   Survey  of
 1970, 1972, 1978).                    Carcinogenic Activity,  1961,  1968,
allow  a quantitative estimate  of risk       «
raise  questions  as  to the  validitv «f t-'h SeV6ral  shortcomings,  however,
of  these studies, the test  pooulLio     extraP°la'ed results.   In both
derably  less than the secies            Were exP°sed  for  periods consi-
                                                "  -
sensitive as,ay of the carnogiciofp
                                               ,
of carcinogenic rislc of
are subject to the foUowing quaUf ltions-
                                                       °°deis  ha- »—
                                                               8S"Mtes
                                                           extrapoiation

                                  2-12

-------
      •    the  less-than-lifetime  duration  of  exposure  in  both  the
           studies used.

      The results of extrapolating  these two data  sets  by use  of  three
 extrapolation models are shown  in  Table 2-7.  Due to different assump-
 tions concerning the actual underlying mathematical relationship between
 dose and effect, the extrapolated risk estimated at the  relatively  lower
 exposure  levels  typical  of  actual   environmental  exposures varies
 appreciably  depending  upon the model and the data  set used.   Regardless
 of  the  model,  however,  higher  risk  estimates  (by  about an order  of
 magnitude) are  predicted from the data of Fedorenko and  Yanysheva (1966)
 than from those of Neal  and Rigdon  (1967),  possibly due  to the different
 modes of oral administration.  [Federenko and Yanysheva  (1966)  utilized
 weekly intubation, while Neal and Rigdon(1967)  incorporated BaP into  the
 diet.]

      The U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency  (1980c)   used a  linear,
 non-threshold model  and  the data of Neal and Rigdon (1967) to calculate
 that  a concentration of  2.8 ng/1  in  surface water would result in  an
 estimated lifetime  excess  probability of  cancer  of   1x10   due   to
 consumption  of  drinking water and fish.

      The data concerning health  effects other  than carcinogenicity  are
 limited."  BaP appears  to  exert  little  effect on  the  developing embryo
 (Bulay  and Wattenberg 1970,  Rigdon  and  Rennels 1964).  However,  it is  an
 active  mutagen,  inducing  in vivo  chromosomal  aberrations  in both  hamster
 spermatogonia  and   bone  marrow   cells (Basler   and   Rohrborn  1978,
 Roszinsky-Kocher  et al.  1979), and  inducing positive mutagenic responses
 in  sister chromatid  exchange  tests  in  hamsters   (Bayer  and  Bauknecht
 1977,  Roszinsky-Kocher et al. 1979, Sirianni and  Huang  1978).   Because
 of  the compound's mutagenicity,  BaP exposure could also be expected  to
 contribute  to  the  genetic burden  of  a  population.    However,  since
 extrapolation procedures  for genetic risks are  not well established, a
 quantitative  risk assessment for these kinds of health  hazards is not
 presently feasible.

      In  addition  to  the  effects  described above, the possibility exists
 of  augmentation  of  effects  through   synergistic  or  co-carcinogenic
mechanisms.   Current understanding of these processes,  however, does not
 allow estimation of human risk.

 2.1.4.2  Human Exposure

     Human exposure  to  BaP  was  evaluated  considering   various  routes
 (food, drinking water,  air,  and  smoking).   These routes  were  considered
as quantitatively as possible, even  though data are often scarce.

     Smoking   appears to  be an important route  of  exposure.   Levels  of
0.025 yg BaP  per cigarette in mainstream smoke were reported by Schmeltz
et_ al.  (1975).   At these  levels,  smokers could be  exposed to 0.025-2.5
Ug/day,  depending upon  the type and  number of  cigarette smoked,  the
                                   2-13

-------
                     TABLE 2- 7.   ESTIMATED LIFETIME EXCESS. PROBABILITY OF CANCER TO HUMANS
                                 DUE TO BENZO[a]PYRENE INGESTION AT VARIOUS EXPOSURE  LEVELS
                                 BASED ON THREE EXTRAPOLATION MODELS3
                             Estimated Lifetime  Excess  Probability of Cancer at  Indicated Exposure Level'
                                                                                    '
Exposure Level (yg/day)
Extrapolation Model
Neal and Rigdon data
Fedorenko
and Yanysheva data
Log-probit Model
Neal and Rigdon data
NJ Fedorenko
M and Yanysheva data
Multi-stage Model
Neal and Rigdon data
Fedorenko
and Yanysheva data
: 0.001
1 x 10~6
1.1 x 10~5
1 x 10~9
3 x 10~7
1.7 x 10~6
7 x 10~6
o
The lifetime excess probability of
0.01
1 x 10~5
1.1 x 10~4
1 x 10~7
2.6 x 10 ~5
1.7 x 10~5
7 x 10~5
cancer represents
°-1 1 10 100
1 x 10~4 1 x 10~3 1 x 10~2 9.2 x 10~2
1.1 x 10"3 1.1 x 10~2 l.l x lO"1 6.7 x 10"1
1.4 x 10~5 7.5 x 10~4 1.5 x 10~2 1.2 x 10"1
1.2 x 10~3 2.1 x 10~2 1.5 x 10'1 4.8 x 10"1
1.7 x 10~4 1.7 x 10~3 3.6 x 10~2 1.5 x 10"1
6.8 x 10~4 6.8 x 10~3 6.5 x 10~2 4.8 x 10"1
the increase in probability of cancer over fhe
                                            »  — -     — -	—-. — — v_u v  ^-«.* ^f f. *_ri^fc4.u j. a-J- ujr u±. ^.Oll^C A. \J V Ci. LilC
normal background incidence, assuming that an individual  is continuously exposed to BaP at the indi-
cated daily intake over a 70-year lifetime.  There is considerable variation in the estimated risk
due to uncertainty introduced by the use of laboratory rodent data,  by the conversion to equivalent
human dosage, and by the application of hypothetical dose-response curves.   In view of several conser-
vative assumptions that were utilized, it is likely that  these predictions overestimate the actual
risk to humans.

-------
 amount  of  smoke  inhaled,  and  the number  of  cigarettes  smoked.   An
 estimated  54.1  million  persons in  the U.S.  smoke cigarettes,  and of
 these  25-30%  smoke more  than 25  cigarettes  per day  (U.S.  DHEW  1979).
 Thus a large segment of the population  (those smoking >25 cigarettes per
 day) could be exposed  to  BaP  in the 0.6-2.5 yg/day range resulting from
 mainstream smoke alone.

      Although levels of BaP in smoke-filled rooms have not been measured
 specifically,  estimates  were  made  based upon  CO levels  summarized by
 Burns  (1975).   CO  levels  of 44-92 mg/m3 were  reported  for rooms  (38-92
 m ) where  30-80  cigarettes had been smoked  with no ventilation.  BaP
 levels of about 0.07-0.2  yg/m3  were  calculated  for  a small room with no
 ventilation, based upon a CO/BaP ratio of 50,000 in side-stream smoke.
                                            0.085
 A non-smoker exposed to such a situation 2 hours/day would be exposed to
 about 0.25-0.7 yg BaP/day; however,  there  are  numerous  uncertainties in
 these calculations.

      Levels of  BaP  in raw  foods are  generally low.   Higher  levels,
 however,  result from cooking processes,  especially charcoal broiling and
 smoking.   Table  2-8 shows  daily exposure  due to  consumption of  such
 foods and summarizes the  assumptions made in developing  the  estimates.
 The  estimated  "typical  exposure"  via  food  ingestion  is  about  0.05
 yg/day.  Consumption of  large amounts  of  charcoal-broiled  food  could
 result  in exposure  amounting to  as  much  as  6 yg/day.

      The  levels reported by  White and Vanderslice  (1980)  for  ambient  air
 imply that persons  in  urban areas are  exposed  to 0.02-2 yg/day,  while
 persons  in  rural areas  are  generally  exposed  to  0.0002-0.2  yg/day,
 assuming  respiratory flow of  20 m3/day.  Although woodburning has been
 shown to  increase indoor air levels over outdoor air, these levels  (mean
 of  about  5 ng/m3)  still fall within  the range for rural and urban  areas
 (Moschandreas  et  al.  1980).  The  U.S.   EPA  (1978b) has  estimated  the
 population  sizes exposed to various concentrations.  These results  shown
 in  Table  2-9 suggest that most  individuals in the  U.S.  are exposed to
 BaP by  inhalation of ambient air  in the  range of 0.02-0.1 yg/day.

     Drinking water does not generally appear to represent a significant
 source  of exposure to BaP.  On the basis of the limited data of Basu and
 Saxena  (1978),  a  typical  exposure  of 0.0006  yg/day,  and a  maximum of
 0.004 yg/day were  calculated for drinking water,  assuming a consumption
 of 2 I/day.

     A  summary of all exposure pathway estimates appears in Table 2-1.

 2.1.5  Aquatic  Effects and Exposure

     No  data from  acute  toxicity bioassays  were  available  for  BaP.
However,  tissue damage, abnormal growth, and the production  of cancer-
like growths ha^e  been reported.   Teratogenic and mutagenic effects have
                                   2-15

-------
        TABLE 2-8.  LEVELS OF BENZO[a] PYRENE GROUP PAHs  IN  FOOD
                    AND ESTIMATED INGESTION EXPOSURE
                                               Berizo [ a ] pyrene
                            (g/day)
 Charcoal  broiled
    beefa

      Hamburger

      Steak

 Smoked  pork

 Smoked  sausage

 Smoked  fish

 Oil

 Fruits

 Grains

 Vegetables
Total

Leafy
Typical
10
3
1
1.5
0.1
18
205
256
248
40
Max.
NA
86
27
30
14
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Contamination
Intake
(ug/kg) (ue/dav)
Typical
NA
5
2
NA
1
1
0.02
NA
0.01
NA
Max .
2.6
50
55
4
37
8
6
0.3
0.1
7.5
Typical
NA
0.02
0.002
0.006
0.0001
0.02
0.004 •
NA
0.002
NA
Max.
0.03
4.3
1.5
0.12
0.5
0.14
1.2
0.08
0.2
0.3
 Consumption of beef - 86 g/day, 15% charcoal-broiled - 80% hamburger,
 20% steak.  Worst case maximum 86 g consumption of charcoal-broiled
 steak.

 Consumption of pork - 27 g/day, 5% smoked.  Worst case maximum,
 27 g/day smoked.
r+
"Consumption of sausage - 30 g/day, 5% smoked.  Worst case maximum
 30 g/day smoked.

 Consumption of fish - 14 g/day, 1% smoked.  Worst case maximum,
 14 g/day smoked.
Source:  USDA (1978, 1980),  U.S.  EPA (1980), White and Vanderslice (1980)
                                 2-16

-------
TABLE 2-9   ESTIMATED SIZE OF THE U.S. POPULATION EXPOSED TO RANGES
            OF BENZO[a]PYRENE CONCENTRATIONS IN AMBIENT AIR
                            SaP Concentration (ng/m )

73,294
0.5-1.0
26,731
1.0-5.0
102,132
>5.0
1059
 Note-   For  some  locations  for which monitoring data were unavailable
 (representing  about  50%  of the population)  the upper  limits of  95/»
 confidence  intervals of  national  average  concentrations were  used.
 These  levels were  as follows:
                                                  o
                        urban SMSA3       1.3  ng/m
                                                  3
                        urban non-SMSA    1.4  ng/m
                                                   3
                        rural             0.23 ng/m
 aStandard Metropolitan Statistical Area


 Source:  U.S. EPA (1978b).
                                 2-17

-------
 also  been  observed  in  aquatic  invertebrates  and  lower  vertebrates
 (Korotkova and Tokin 1968,  Neff 1979).

      The available data on BaP concentrations  in ambient  waters suggest
 that  exposure  of aquatic  organisms is  low.   As  discussed  previously,
 levels in surface water of  less than 1 ug/1 are most common.   The levels
 of BaP  in  sediments may frequently  exceed 1000 pg/kg, and  represent a
 potential source of exposure.   However, the bioavailability of sediment-
 bound BaP is unknown.

 2.1.6  Risk Considerations

 2.1.6.1  Human Risk of Carcinogenicity

      The  results  of   the   extrapolation  of  the  animal   studies   on
 carcinogenicity have  been  discussed and  presented previously  in  Table
 2-7  (p. 2-14).  The qualifications and major assumptions have  also been
 discussed and underline the caution with which these calculations must
 be viewed.

      The risks based upon these calculations and the exposure  estimates
 made  for specific subpopulations  are  shown in Table 2-1  (p. 2-2). The
 highest  estimated  excess  probability  of  cancer   appears  to  be for
 smokers,  especially   heavy  smokers  with an  estimated  incidence   of
 230-7700 excess cancers/year.  Dietary  exposure, primarily due  to smoked
 and  charcoal-broiled foods, may result in an  estimated  13-1900 excess
 cancers/year.   Risk estimates  associated with inhalation exposures show
 a  wide  range.   Urban  residents   may   experience   1-95,000  excess
 cancers/year  and  residents  of   rural  areas,  «  1  to  2400  excess
 cancers/year.   Drinking water consumption  generally appears to present a
 lower  degree of risk.  It should be noted, however,  that these estimates
 are based upon  numerous assumptions  and limited monitoring data.  These
 limitations are discussed in this  summary  and Volume IV of this report.

 2.1.6.2   Human  Risk Associated With Non-Carcinogenic Effects

     Little information exists regarding other potential adverse effects
 of exposure  to BaP.  Although this  compound  has been identified  as  an
 active  mutagen  in numerous  systems,  a  quantitative estimate  of genetic
 risk  is not feasible.   In  addition,  one  should not overlook possible
 augmentation of  risk through synergistic or co-carcinogenic mechanisms;
 however,  current understanding  of  the  co-carcinogenesis process  is not
 sufficiently adequate  to  allow estimation of associated human risks  at
 this time.

 2.1.6.3  Risk to Aquatic Organisms

     Data on effects  of  BaP  on  biota are  extremely  limited.   As  a
 result, no statement of potential risk, even qualitative,  can  be made  at
 this  time.   Similarly, the U.S.  EPA  (1980c)  was  unable  to  set  water
quality  criteria for BaP due to  the  lack of data.  It should be noted,
however, that high sediment  levels may  pose some risk to aquatic biota,
                                   2-18

-------
although there is at present no way  to  evaluate the environmental risks
of contaminated sediment.

2.2  NAPHTHALENE

2.2.1  Risk Conclusions

     A  review  of the  environmental monitoring  and human  effects data
indicates  that  the  dose  levels  at  which  acute effects  of naphthalene
have been  observed  in humans  or mammals  are  generally more  than five
orders  of  magnitude greater than  human exposure  levels  through inges-
tion,  and  at  least three  orders  of magnitude higher  than inhalation
exposure  levels  to specific  subpopulations  associated with  mothball
usage  and  cigarette smoking.  Chronic  toxicity studies have  failed to
demonstrate the carcinogenic activity of naphthalene.  The major effects
of naphthalene on humans  include  cataracts and hemolytic anemia.  There
appears to be little acute risk to humans  from environmental exposure to
naphthalene; however,  severe adverse effects are possible from acciden-
tal ingestion of substantial quantities of naphthalene.3
     The U.S. EPA has not  established a water quality criterion for the
protection  of human health  due to  the inadequacy  of  the data  on the
chronic  toxicity  of naphthalene and  the lack  of  epidemiologic studies
(U.S. EPA 1980d).

     There  is very  little information available on  the extent of expo-
sure of aquatic biota to naphthalene.  However, the available monitoring
data  suggest concentrations  reported  inr:ambient water  are  about  two
orders  of  magnitude  lower  than the  levels associated  with  acute or
chronic effects to aquatic organisms.**

2.2.2  Releases of Naphthalene to the Environment

     Production of naphthalene in  1978  totaled  2.35  x 105 kkg, 70%  from
coal  tar   and   30%   from  petroleum  (Abshire  e_t  al. . 1980).   Total
environmental releases  in  1978 were equivalent  to 5%  of production:
10,600 kkg  were  released to  air, 300 kkg were released to land, 240 kkg
were  released  to  POTWs,  and  approximately  340 kkg  were  discharged
directly  to  surface  waters.  Production  activities accounted for the
estimated   annual  release  of  83  kkg  (Brown  1975);  direct  uses of
naphthalene released 5,000  kkg,  and sources  of  inadvertently released
naphthalene total more  than  6,000 kkg.5
 3These  conclusions  are  taken  from Volume  II of  this report.
 **See footnote  3.
 5These  estimates were developed by Acurex, Inc.  for EPA under  Contract
  No.  68-01-6017.  Their data  are summarized in  Volume  II of  this
  report.
                                    2-19

-------
 2>2'3  ^te and Distribution in the Environment

        »n                 a Vap°r Press«e "*  0-09  torr  at 25°C (SRI
         Inc  1979°,   ."? octanol:«««  partition  coefficient of  3?37
       -79
             ««    .                   .-

ta«Vaif '^ 9e"lmen; V'a adsorP"'»' — sedimentation may be i^rl
tant  if  there is  a significant amount  of  suspended material  in  rtL
aquatic system (Neff 1979).  Biodegradation mayP also b^ a s?Lif iclnt

   6   r°                                                 *

                 -TT ^-^ '^-1SS5
   %i^^^^


        tt^^^ -^
                                   adsorbed naphthalene
'See footnote 5.
                                 2-20

-------
EXAMS  results  for  six  generalized  aquatic  systems  suggest  that the
naphthalene  in  sediment  will  tend  to remain  there  unless  there is
considerable  mixing  between  the  sediment and  the water  column,  since
neither photolysis  nor anaerobic  degradation are  important  fate  path-
ways.   In summary,  although  the  sediments  and  the  water  columns of
aquatic systems may contain  naphthalene,  accumulation  will occur in the
sediment.

     Monitoring data confirm that  concentrations in sediment are higher
than  those in  water.   The  STORE! data base (U.S. EPA  1980e)  reports
actual measurements of naphthalene in ambient waters ranging from  0.005
yg/1 to 17 yg/1; effluent concentrations up to 36,000 yg/1 are  reported.
Actual sediment  concentrations  reported in STORET range from 0.02  yg/kg
to  496  ug/kg.   Drinking  water concentrations up  to 1.4  yg/1  were re-
ported in the literature (U.S. EPA  1980d).   Ambient air concentrations
of naphthalene were reported to be 0.35 ng/m3 in an urban area, and 0.05
ng/m3 in  a rural area (Krstulovic  et,  al. 1977).  Concentrations to  which
industrial workers may  be exposed range from 102  ng/m3 to 10° ng/m3 in
the  vapor phase,  and  up  to 4  x 103  ng/m3  adsorbed  onto particulate
matter (Bjorseth est al. 1978a,b).
2.2.4  Human Effects and Exposure

     Naphthalene  is absorbed  through  ingestion,  inhalation,  and  skin
contact;  however,  the  rate 'and extent  of  absorption  and  the  tissue
distribution have not been studied in detail  (U.S. EPA 1980d).  There  is
little quantitative information  on the  carcinogenic or long-term effects
of naphthalene.   Two experiments by  Knake (1956) indicated a slight but
not  statistically  significant  increase  in  lymphosarcomas in  rats and
lymphocytic  leukemia  in mice; several  other  skin painting studies  were
negative  for carcinogenesis.  Mutagenicity  studies were  also negative
(U.S. EPA 1980d).  A single study noted  retarded heart development and
cranial  ossification  in rats exposed  to  high concentrations throughout
gestation (Harris et al. 1979).

     The  major effects  linked to naphthalene  exposure include cataracts,
sometimes accompanied by  retinopathy and hemolytic anemia.  Near  blind-
ness was reported in one human  upon ingestion  of  5  g naphthalene  ('WO
mg/kg);  bilateral cataracts  were also reported among workers exposed  to
naphthalene,  although  details of that  study  were not available (Ghetti
and Mariani  1956).   Cataracts and retinopathy were reported in labora-
tory animals at  dose levels of  1,000  mg/kg/day.   The oral LDLo (lowest
lethal  dose)  reported  for naphthalene in children was  ^100  mg/kg  (Sax
1979);  the oral LDso (lethal dose  to 50% of the subjects) observed  in
rodents was  ^2,000  mg/kg (U.S. EPA 1980d).

     Individuals  with relative deficiencies in the enzymes  (G6PD)  needed
to  maintain glutathione  levels  in  red blood  cells  (approximately 100
million  people worldwide) may have  increased  sensitivity to naphthalene
 (Wintrobe et al.  1974);  the  fetus and  the  newborn  may  also  have  an
                                    2-21

-------
   increased sensitivity (Dawson et al  losfll   IT,
   increased risk  of  develop^ nTmoTv,:^     <    t subpopulations are at
   damage.               «wpin» hemolytic anemia, vhich may  lead  to renal

 W/l.  and a fish consumption of 21
 Data concerning  naphthalene
                                                                     of 2
about  one-third  of H.S   adults
smoke more than 25 ciga^ttes par day
of the U.S. population
alene doses greate
content  in •i
Schmeltz et al. (1976); in a smoke
tration wa7 eTtimated  (by
                                                                    Since

                                                                °f  the"
                                                            lar§e  segment
                                             C°Uld be 6Xp°Sed to  naPh^~
                                                     ™*-  Naphthalene
                                                     46  yg/cigarette by
                                                                 •'«"
                                                           in
                                                   inhalation  exposures
                          ^
related  to  domestic use  of «flJf n       ^
analogy  to  dichlorobenzene f 1« Sf rL^ed  b
Approximately 26 x 10* households in  the us   ue  mot    n              '
one-third  of  the mothballs  nJrJno ^ ^  U'S'J use  mothballs,  though only
1980h).            mothballs  produced  contain  naphthalene   (U.S.  EPA


2'2-5  Aquatic Effects and Exposure
                                  2-22

-------
 generally about 10 yg/1;  sediment  levels  range from 0.02  pg/kg to less
 than 500 yg/kg (U.S.  EPA 1980e).

 2.3  ANTHRACENE,  ACENAPHTHENE, FLUORANTHENE.  FLUORENE,
      PHENANTHRENE,  AND PYRENE ,

 2.3.1  Risk Conclusions

      The human effects data  for  this group  of  PAHs are  inadequate to
 warrant a quantitative extrapolation  of the  human risk from environmen-
 tal exposure  to  these compounds.   There are  virtually no toxicological
 data. -)A Nofle_of ,Jth_e_cojippunds in  this jgrpup has been reported  to be
^carcinogenic by~ the oral jo^te7Ts"cKmahT'l955, Innes'ef-gi". "1969) ;' pyfene
 and -fluoranthene,  however,  have  been  reported	to_ be  co-carcinogens
 (Salaman and Roe"'T9T67 Scribner 1973).  Due  to inhalation of "mains tfream
 cigarette smoke reported  to  contain  fluoranthene  and fluorene  (Schmeltz
 et^ al.  1975), smokers may be exposed to higher levels of these PAHs than
 Is" "the  general population.   However, the limits  on  the risk associated
 with  these  environmental  exposure scenarios  cannot  be defined at this
 time.

      The U.S. EPA reports that sufficient  data on acenaphthene were not
 available  to  permit   the  derivation  of a  water  quality  criterion that
 would  protect  humans against  the  potential   toxicity  of  this compound.
 However, the level for controlling undesirable odor and taste quality in
 ambient water has been estimated  to  be 20 ug/1 on the basis of organo-
 leptic  data which have  no   demonstrated  relationship   to  adverse  human
 health  effects  (U.S.  EPA 1980f).    For  fluoranthene,   an  ambient  water
 quality criterion for the protection of human health has been set at  42
 yg/1  (U.S.  EPA 1980g).  This  criterion  was  based on  a no-effect  level
 for  mortality in  a   mouse   skin-painting  experiment.   Ambient surface
 water  concentrations  above  these  recommended  levels have been reported
 for both  of these compounds.  No  specific water  quality criteria have
 been set for the other PAHs  in this group (U.S. EPA 1980c).

      Risk  to  aquatic biota  exposed  to ambient concentrations  of  these
 PAHs  is expected to  be low.   The  U.S. EPA has not  established ambient
 water quality criteria for these compounds for the protection of aquatic
 life  (U.S.  EPA 1980c,f,g).   However,  all  ambient concentrations in the
 STORET  data base  (U.S.   EPA  1980e)  were below   the  levels  that  were
 reported  to  be  acutely  toxic  to  freshwater  organisms.   The  STORET
 concentration data for surface water do overlap the range of chronic and
 acute toxic effects levels for marine organisms, which  appear to be more
 sensitive to these PAHs  (Neff  1979,  U.S.  EPA 1980g); however, there are
 no monitoring data specifically for marine systems.  Since the potential
 does exist  for bioaccumulation of these PAHs  in zooplankton  (Giddings et
 al.  1978),  and subsequent biomagnification by fish (Herbes 1976), direct
 comparison  of  ambient concentrations  with  effects levels may  not ade-
 quately describe the  risk to aquatic organisms.
                                    2-23

-------
 2.3.2   Releases  to  the  Environment

     The  six PAHs  in the  anthracene  group are  all used  commercially.
 Total  use  in 1979 amounted to approximately 830 kkg; most  (720  kkg)  was
 imported.   The  annual  (domestic and  imported)  supply  of  fluorene  and
 phenanthrene was reported to be less  than  1 kkg of each (U.S.  Dept.  of
 Commerce 1980).

     These  PAHs  are used as intermediates in the synthesis of a variety
 of compounds, including  Pharmaceuticals, pigments,  plastics, pesticides,
 and  photographic chemicals.   Since the  PAH  compounds  are consumed  in
 these  processes, a small, approximately  1%, release to the environment
 may be  assumed;  thus, about 8 kkg of these  six PAHs were estimated  to  be
 released in 1979, distributed almost  equally  among the  air,  land, and
 water compartments.

     The  chief  source  of  inadvertent releases  of anthracene  and the
 other PAHs  in this group is combustion.  Burning of wood for residential
 heating generates the largest amount of  these  PAHs, 3,200 kkg or 60%  of
 the total  (5,400 kkg)  estimated  annual atmospheric emissions of anthra-
 cene group  PAHs;  coal,  gas,  and  oil  rired  residential heating  units
 release less than 800 kkg combined.  Anthracene and phenanthrene account
 for 75% of  the total atmospheric emissions from residential wood burning
 attributable  to  the PAHs  in this  group.   Other combustion  sources  of
 these PAHs  include  agricultural  burning,  prescribed burning,  wildfires,
 and combustion of gasoline.8

     In 1978, coal  tar  distillation resulted in the inadvertent produc-
 tion of approximately 175,000 kkg  of anthracene  group PAHs  (U.S.  DOE
 1979, Rhodes 1954).  Of this total, the amounts released to the environ-
ment are estimated to be:   30 kkg to air, 14  kkg to land,  17 kkg  to
POTWs,   22  kkg to surface  water,  for a  total  estimated  environmental
 release of  83 kkg  in  1978.   Approximately 15 kkg  of  the  PAHs  in this
group were  released  to water  in  oil spills and  14  kkg  to air  in petro-
 leum refinery wastestreams, according to 1978  data.9

     The total environmental  releases  of  the  anthracene group  PAHs for
 1978 are estimated  to be about  5,600  kkg;  of  this total,  5,400 kkg or
97% is estimated to be released to  air, 60 kkg  to surface water,  100 kkg
to POTWs,  and approximately 1 kkg to land.10

2.3.3  Fate and Distribution in the Environment

     The environmental  release  data  indicate  that  most discharges  of
anthracene   and  the  other  PAHs  in  this  group  are  to  the  atmosphere.
 These estimates were developed by Acurex,  Inc.  for EPA under Contract
 68-01-6017.   Their data are summarized in  Volume III of this report.
8See footnote 7.
9See footnote 7.
10See footnote 7.
                                   2-24

-------
Atmospheric  deposition (from  both wet  and dry  processes)  may remove
5-26% of  the atmospheric  load of anthracene in  urban areas, accounting
for 75-300 kkg/yr of anthracene  fallout.   It  is  estimated that about 2%
will fall directly on inland surface waters, representing 1.5-7-8 kkg/yr
anthracene.  The upper limit  on  this  range corresponds to deposition in
areas near  combustion sources,  where  the anthracene  will  be primarily
adsorbed  onto  particulates.   The percentage of  these  PAHs  that remains
in  the  atmosphere will  be  degraded  by  photolysis to  oxygenated com-
pounds, including quinones (Radding &t_ al. 1976).

     Since  the water  solubilities  of  the  anthracene  group  PAHs are
relatively  low and  the octanol:water partition  coefficients are fairly
high, adsorption  onto both  organic and  inorganic matter  is a primary
removal pathway for  these compounds in  the water column.  The particu-
late matter will  ultimately be  transported to the sediment where  these
PAHs will accumulate  (Neff  1979, Smith  et_ al.  1978); biodegradation and
photo-oxidation  in  sediments  are  expected  to  be  quite  slow.   The
fraction  of  these PAH  that  remain in  the water column is expected  to be
degraded  photolytically  (Zepp  and  Schlotzhauer  1979,  Radding  et al.
1976); however, the  extent  of this removal pathway will be  affected by
the  turbidity and light  penetration in the actual system  (Southworth
1977).  Volatilization from water  is not expected to be  a major fate
process,  but  the relative  importance  of this  pathway  differs  among
aquatic   systems   (Southworth   1979).    Bioconcentration  factors  for
anthracene  are on the  order  of several hundred (Herbes 1976); half-lives
for  biodegradation  have been  determined to be  1-2 weeks in acclimated
cultures  (Quave et al. 1980).

     EXAMS  (U.S. EPA 1980b)  calculations  for anthracene  indicate  that in
all  model  systems,  except  the  oligotrophic  lake  where  sedimentation
rates  are  low,  over  80%  of the  anthracene resides  in  the  sediment
compartment when the  system  is  at  steady state.   Rapid photolysis is
predicted by EXAMS  for the  anthracene remaining in the  water column of
clear,  quiescent  systems;  volatilization is important  in  the pond and
eutrophic lake systems where  light penetration  is reduced by  suspended
matter.   Biological  degradation is important only  in  the highly  produc-
tive eutrophic  lake.   In   the   more  dynamic  river  systems,   physical
transport (downstream) accounts  for most  of the  anthracene  removal.

     Anthracene  and  the related PAHs have been detected  in  all  environ-
mental  media  (Kim  and  Stone  1979;  U.S. EPA   1980c,e,f,g;  White and
Vanderslice  1980).    Monitoring  data   support   the  predictions  that
 significant amounts  of anthracene  and  related  PAHs  will reside in the
 sediments.   The majority of  the STORET  surface  water concentrations of
 these  PAHs  are  less  than   100  Mg/lj   STORET   effluent  data  include
 concentrations ranging from <1 yg/1 to <1,000 ug/1  for  these PAHS  (U.S.
 EPA  1980e).   Various   other   sources   report  effluent   and   sewage
 concentrations of fluoranthene from 2 ug/1 to 20  yg/1 (U.S.  EPA 1980g).
Levels  of pyrene  and  fluoranthene in  soil were high, up  to  120,000  wg/kg
 (White  and Vanderslice  1980).    Concentrations  of pyrene  in  several
 edible  marine species  were  reported to  range  from less than 0.6  ug/kg  to
                                    2-25

-------
   58 yg/kg (wet weight)  (Pancirov and Brown 1977)
   • *       of urban locations          -
   2'3'4  Human  Effects  and
                     t.                    i
     which  to  determine  the dose **ln?  ? 5    Z  n° toxic°l°Sical  data
humans  or laboratory immals    The ch/onf "V? aCUte tOXiC ef f ects  in
have not  been  studied extensivelv.  hn       ""ecta  °f these  compounds
that none has  been sho^ to ' bt >  c^n^ ^ available d^a indicate
1955).  Phenanthrene an? pyrene show wf'f ^ * th* Oral r°Ute (Schmahl
mo                                 "
                       an   pyrene show w
  mouse skin carcinogenesis ^xperimen"  (Us   ^1^0^°"  aCtiVity in
  studies were  negative,  and no  data ^ were  kvSLblf  §8)V  Muta§enicity
  effects of these  six  compounds.  SincTLl  «^ p^ °^  the  terato8enic
  lipid-soluble,  absorption and  distribution  ^    I ^ th±S  gr°up are
  expected to occur.               distribution  throughout  the  body  are
  tal  exposure^ ige^ioof To^?* **"• ^  ^^  -vironmen-
  air  is  estimated to le less  than  f uWH^'f ^ inhalation of  ambient
  maximum  exposure  levels   could  >,    8/ S uf°r 6ach  °f these six PAHs;
  anthene. "^ However  very SfA J% "  Mgh  3S  21  PS/day  for  f^^~
  drinking  water ^5^3^ ^ £»  "^^^  Particularly for
 meats, appears to be the maior rcfui-/ «f   particularly  charcoal-broiled
 in  this  group  (U.I.  DOA 1978   1Q8H  erfPc°SUre f °r a11 of the six ?AHs
 typical  exposure  to  the geneVal population!*""

 2.3.5  Aquatic Effects and


 in
                    found
                                               o
however, plants were  found to T.         °f the Slx PAHs in thls
                    '
UData taken from Volume III of this
                                     report.
                                  2-26

-------
 fluoranthene concentrations as low as 12 yg/1  (U.S.  EPA 1978c).   Micro-
 cosm experiments conducted in  the  presence of sunlight have  shown that
 1 yg/1 to 10 ug/1  of  anthracene killed all organisms  present (Personal
 Communication,  P.  Landrum  et  al.,  Savannah  River  Ecology  Laboratory
 1980).   However, these laboratory  data  may not be directly  representa-
 tive of  the  effects of these  PAHs in  actual environmental  systems.

      The monitoring data  documenting the  exposure of  aquatic biota  to
 these PAHs are quite  limited.   All of the ambient water  concentrations
 of anthracene,  and most of those for the other PAHs  in  this  group,  were
 reported to  be less than  100 yg/1  (U.S.  EPA 19890e); all of  the  actual
 concentrations  in ambient  waters  were reported  to  be  below 1.7 mg/1, the
 lowest  acute effects  level for  freshwater organisms (U.S. EPA  1978c).
 However,  25-40% of the detectable  concentrations  for five PAHs in  this
 group (excluding  anthracene)  were  between  100  yg/1  and  1,000  yg/1;
 only 8-17 observations above  detection limits were  reported  (U.S.  EPA
 1980e).   Acute toxic  effects  and  chronic  effects for marine  organisms
 have been attributed   to  concentrations within   this  range.   Sediment
 concentrations  of acenaphthene and fluorene were  reported to  be  within
 the  range  of  2  yg/kg to 50 yg/kg; unremarked sediment concentrations for
 the  other PAHs  ranged from not  detected to   1,000  yg/kg  (U.S.   EPA
 1980e).   The extent of the bioavailability of  these  compounds bound  to
 sediments  has not been clearly  determined at this  time.

 2.4   ACENAPHTHYLENE, BENZ[a]ANTHRACENE, BENZO[b]FLUORANTHENE.
      BENZO[k]FLUORANTHENE.  BENZO[g.h.i]PERYLENE, CHRYSENE,
      DIBENZ[a,h]ANTHRACENE, AND INDENO[1,2,3-c.d]PYRENE

 2.4.1  Risk Conclusions

      Data  for  the PAHs  included  in this group  were inadequate  for
 purposes of  quantitative risk assessments since dose-response data were
 unavailable.    Bj^z^ajaaehracene   and  dibenz[a,h]anthracene   are  both
 carcinogenic  in mice by the oral route  (IARC  1972).   The  compounds are
 also  complete  carcinogens  in mice  exposed  by  the dermal  route,  as are
 benzo [b] fluoranthene and  indeno [1,2,3-c td]jvjrene_.   Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
 is a  co-carcinogen with BaP and benz[a]anthracene; benzojb]fluoranthene,.
 chrysene,  and   indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene   are   all  (^±t±ators) of  skin
 carcinogenesis  in mice.  No carcinogenicity data were~fouH3~?or acenaph-
 thylene  (U.S. EPA 1980c, IARC 1972, Habs £t al. 1980).

     Only  limited  data are available describing  the acute and chronic
 effects of the PAHs in this group for aquatic biota.  The results of the
 only  reported  laboratory   toxicity   test  for   any of  these  compounds
 indicate that benz[a]anthracene at  a  concentration of 1  yg/1  caused 87%
mortality  in bluegill  sunfish in  6 months  (Brown  et  al.  1975).  Levels
 of these compounds  in  ambient surface water are generally  lower than  1
 yg/1, although levels up to about 2000 yg/1 have been reported (U.S.  EPA
 1980c,e).  High sediment levels of  PAHs,  as may be found near industri-
alized areas, may pose some risk to  aquatic biota, although  the  extent
of bioavailability of sediment-bound PAH is not well documented.
                                  2-27

-------
 2.4.2  Releases to the  Environment

      The  PAHs  in this group  are  released  primarily  to  the atmosphere and
 result  mainly  from combustion  sources.  Residential heating  accounts for
 the  largest releases,  since these  emissions  are  largely uncontrolled.
 Emission  factors  indicate  that  fireplace burning produces  a  smaller
 amount  of PAHs per unit of  fuel than do  the more  airtight  wood-burning
 units used for primary heating.  On the  basis  of  emission factors  and
 quantity  of fuel  consumed in 1978,  the  following  estimates  of  annual
 atmospheric releases for this group  PAHs  can be  made:

      •     residential coal combustion —  130 kkg;

      •     fireplace  burning, primary  wood heating and  auxiliary wood
          heating  — 40 kkg, 630 kkg, and 800 kkg,  respectively;

      •     two  types of  forest fires,  prescribed burning  and wildfire
          burning  — 450 kkg and 260 kkg,  respectively; and

      •    agricultural burning — 170 kkg.

     With  the  exception   of gasoline  combustion  (accounting for   the
 release of about  40  kkg  of this  group  of  PAHs  in  1978),  all other
 combustion  sources are  estimated to release total  quantities of these
 PAHs  that are much smaller on a national level than the amounts released
 during  combustion of coal  and  wood.   Utility  boilers,   municipal  and
 commercial incinerators, and industrial internal-combustion  engines  are
 all controlled  units, have relatively  high combustion  efficiencies,  and
 are believed to release relatively low amounts of these PAHs.12

     In addition  to  combustion  sources,  these PAHs are released  from a
 few contained   sources,  primarily  related  to  coal  tar  and  petroleum.
 Coal tar production and  distillation activities account for the environ-
mental release  of  approximately  50  kkg (1978)  of these six  PAHs; their
 distribution is believed to  be almost  equally  divided  among  releases to
 air,  land, surface water,  and POTWs.  Significant environmental releases
associated with petroleum sources (exclusive of gasoline combustion)  are
believed to be  limited to oil spills and  atmospheric releases  at  refin-
 eries. ld
1 9
  These estimates were developed by Acurex,  Inc.  for EPA Under Contract
  No. 68-01-6017.  These data are summarized in Volume IV of this
  report.
13See footnote 12.
                                   2-28

-------
2.4.3  Fate and Distribution in the Environment

     The PAHs in this group are released to the environment primarily as
products  of combustion.   Although  photolysis of  atmospheric  PAHs  is
relatively  rapid  (Versar  1979),  wet  and  dry  deposition of  the atmo-
spheric PAH emissions probably represent the major input pathways to the
aquatic environment based upon  the  analysis  conducted for BaP described
previously in this summary and in Volume IV of this report.

     Calculations using  the  model  of  Mackay  (1979)  indicate  that  at
equilibrium  99.9%  of  BaP in  the  aquatic environment  resides  in  the
sediment compartment; very small amounts will be found in the air (vapor
phase  BaP),  water,  or biota.   This  distribution of  BaP  is  probably
representative of  the fate of  other compounds in this group  as well.
The  U.S.  EPA  (1980b) EXAMS  model  was used  to   predict  the  fate  and
distribution of  BaP  in  six  generalized aquatic  systems.   The results
indicate that in all of the systems modelled, maximum BaP concentrations
in sediment can be expected to be higher than total water concentrations
by factors up  to  10 .   The EXAMS data  also indicate  that more than 90%
of the BaP will reside in the sediment for all aquatic systems examined,
with the exception of  the  oligotrophic lake  (81%).  Again, this pattern
of distribution should hold  true for  other  compounds in  this  group  of
PAHs.

     The most significant fate  processes for  these compounds in aquatic
systems include adsorption  (with subsequent transport  to the sediment)
and  chemical degradation  (photolysis).  Volatilization  and  biodegrada-
tion are expected to be slow processes for the PAHs in this group (Smith
et_ £LL. 1978,  Quave et al_. 1980, Colwell and Sayler 1978, Gardner et al.
1979).  These  compounds  are  expected  to  be  relatively  persistent  in
aquatic systems as was predicted for BaP by use of EXAMS.

     There are fewer monitoring data  for  the other PAHs  in this group
than for BaP.  Most of the observations in the STORET data base for the
PAHs in this group  are reported to be  below  the  detection limits.   The
PAH concentrations reported above detection limits for sediment samples
range  from  0.002  yg/kg  to  2600  yg/kg.   Detectable  ambient  water
concentrations recorded  in STORET  range  from 0.01  ug/1  to  1500  ug/1
(U.S. EPA 1980c).

     Data from other  sources  indicate that the concentrations  of these
compounds in ambient waters  are generally less than 1  yg/1 (White  and
Vanderslice 1980).   Concentrations  in  drinking water were  reported  to
range from 0.1  ng/1 to 4.0 ng/1 (Basu and Saxena 1978).  In this survey,
the highest concentration  for the PAHs in the BaP group was  4.0 ng/1,
reported for benzo[g,h,i]perylene in  a  drinking water sample taken from
Philadelphia,  PA.

     Ambient air concentrations  of  these  PAHs were also  reported to  be
significantly higher in urban areas than in rural  areas.   In a study  of
                                   2-29

-------

  „<,/ 3  t   r •"«""  "« uignesc rAii  concentrations in air  CUD to 21  1
  ng/m  for benzore.h.ilDervlen^ «<»^  «««,*«j  r-_ „. „  .    :;ip " ^i'J
 2.4.4  Human Effects and Exposure

m°re active ««t»8«i than any of  the  compounds
                                                                       in
 with     surH1011 " avail/ble  on  oth« toxic effects associated
                "

    the  b,    f  t Pr/ay "Presents an important source of exposure
                                -^

            (1978),
                              water  exposures  are  generally  less
                                                        ralless
2-4-5  Aquatic Effects and Exposure


     There are  almost no  data describing  the  acute  toxic  effects to
aquatic organisms  of  the PAHs  in  this group.   Benz[a]anthracene  at a
                  ummarized  ^ Volume  IV of this report.
       information is  described  in Volume IV of this report.
                                  2-30

-------
concentration of 1 ug/1 caused 87% mortality in freshwater bluegill in 6
months (Brown et al. 1975).'  No other acute toxicity data for these PAHs
were found.

     A limited  number  of  studies of sublethal  and  chronic effects have
been found  as  described in Volume IV of  this  report.'  These are gener-
ally inadequate to define the concentration ranges associated with these
effects.

     Experiments  conducted on  a  small  number  of  species of  aquatic
invertebrates  and  lower  vertebrates  have  shown  that  PAHs in  the  BaP
group may  cause tumor  production and teratogenic  and  mutagenic effects
(Neff  1979).   Concentration  levels  associated with these  effects were
not  given.   Increased   liver  disease  in  benthic  English sole  has been
shown to be associated with sediments  contaminated  with PAHs;  however,
no concentration data are available (Malins 1979).

     The limited number of positive observations in STORET of  the PAHs
in  this  group  indicates  a concentration  range  in surface  waters from
0.01 ug/1  to  1500  Ug/1;  benzo[k]fluoranthene,  with  five  observations
ranging from 320 ug/1  to  1500 ug/1, was consistently reported  at higher
levels than  the other  PAHs in this group  (U.S. EPA  1980c).  Other data
sources generally report  ambient water concentrations of  these  PAHs  to
be  less than 1  ug/1 (White and  Vanderslice  1980).   Sediment concentra-
tions recorded  in STORET  are generally  less  than  1000  ug/kg; however, a
few  observations  were   reported  above  1000  ug/kg.  In  the absence  of
quantitative data on toxicologic effects, it is not possible  to assess
the significance of exposure of  aquatic biota  to  concentrations in this
range.

     The environmental  conditions present in an aquatic system actually
determine the extent of exposure  to aquatic  organisms.   Though environ-
mental models predict  that most  of the  BaP  (and  probably  the  compounds
in  this group  as well) in aquatic systems  will  be transported  to  the
sediments,   the  bioavailability   of  sediment-bound  PAHs   is  not  well
understood.   Several   studies  have concluded  that  any PAHs  that  are
actually taken up by fish come from the interstitial waters and from the
water column  (dissolved and/or  adsorbed  onto  suspended  solids);  uptake
from the sediment itself does not appear to be  significant (Neff 1979).
                                   2-31

-------
                               REFERENCES
 Abshire, A.D.;  Dickson,  S.E.;  Gibson,  T.A.; King,  K.L.   Petrochemical
 industry  overview  In  Chemical  Economics  Handbook.   Menlo  Park,  CA-
 Stanford Research Institute, 1980.

 Andelman, J.B.;  Suess,  J.J.  Polynuclear  aromatic hydrocarbons  in the
 water  environment.   Bull.  World Health.  Org.  43:479-508-   1970    (As
 cited by Neff 1979)

 Arthur D. Little,  Inc.   Air-to-surface pathway  evaluation methodology.
 Draft Final Report.  Contract  68-01-5949.  Washington, DC:   Monitoring
 and Data Support  Division,  Office  of  Water Regulations  and  Standards?
 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency;  1981.

 Easier, A.;  Rohrbom, G.  Mutagenicity of polycyclic hydrocarbons.  IV
 Correlated  studies  with anthracene,  benz[a]anthracene,  benz[a]pyrene,
 chrysene and phenanthrene.   Proc. Perugia  Quadrenn.  Int. Conf.  Cancer
 6:843-849;  1978.

 Basu,  O.K.;  Saxena,  J.   Polynuclear aromatic  hydrocarbons in  selected
 U.S.   drinking  waters  and  their  raw  water  sources.    Environ   Sci
 Technol.  11(7):795-798;  1978.

 Bayer,  U.;  Bauknecht,-T^  Dose-dependence of sister-chromatid exchanges
 induced by  3 hydrocarbons in the  in vivo  bone marrow test with  Chinese
 hamsters.  Experiential: 25;  1977.

 Bjorseth, A.;  Bjorseth,  0.;  Fjeldstad,  P.E.  Polycyclic aromatic hydro-
 carbons in the  work  atmosphere.   I.  Determination in an aluminum reduc-
 tion plant.  Scand.  J. Work  Environ. Health 4:212-223; 1978.

 Bjorseth, A.; Bjorseth,  0.;  Fjeldstad,  P.E.   Polycyclic aromatic hydro-
 carbons in  the work atmosphere.  II.   Determination in  a coke plant
 Scand.  J. Work Environ. Health 4:224-236;  1978.

 Brown,  E.R. et  a^.   Tumors in fish caught  in polluted waters:  Possible
 explanations.   Comparative  Leukemia Res.  1975,  Leukemogenesis    Univ
 Tokyo Press/Karger, Basel; 47 p. (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980c)

 Brown,  S.L.  Research program on hazard priority ranking of manufactured
 chemicals.   Phase II.  Final  Report,  SRI.   Washington,  DC:   National
 Science Foundation; 1975.

Bulay,  O.M.;  Wattenberg, L.W.    Carcinogenic  effect  of  subcutaneous
administration  of benzo[a]pyrene  during  pregnancy  on  the  progreny
Proc.  Soc. Exp. Biol. (NY).   135:84;  1970.   (As cited by IARC 1972)
                                  2-32

-------
Burns, D.M.   Consequences of smoking  - the involuntary  smoker.   Proc.
Third World Conf. on Smoking and Health.  11:51-58; 1975.

Colucci,  J.M.;   Begeman,  C.R.   Polynuclear aromatic  hydrocarbons  and
other pollutants  in Los  Angeles air.   In, Proc.  Int.  Clean  air  Cong.
Academic Press 2:28; 1971.  (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980c)

Colwell, R.R.; Sayler, G.S.  Microbial  degradation of  industrial chemi-
cals.  Water Pollut. Microbiol.  2:111-134; 1978.

Dawson, J.P.; Thayer,  W.W.; Deforges,  J.F.   Acute hemolytic  anemia in
the  newborn  infant  due to  naphthalene  poisoning:   report of  two  cases
with  investigations  into  the mechanism  of the disease.   Blood 13(12):
13-1125; 1958.

Fedorenko, Z.P.; Yanysheva,  N.Y.  Hyg. and  Sanit.  31(8):168-173;  1966.
(As cited by Survey of Compounds Which Have Been Tested For Carcinogenic
Activity 1970-1971)

Jardner,  W.S.;  Lee,  R.F.;  Tenore,  K.R.; Smith,  L.W.    Degradation of
selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons  in coastal  sediments:  impor-
tance of  microbes and polychaete worms.  Water Air Soil  Pollut.  11(3):
339-347; 1979.

Ghetti, G.;  Mariani,  L.   Eye  changes  due  to  naphthalene.    Med.  Lav.
47:524; 1956.  (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980d)

Giddings, J.M.;  Walton, B.T.; Eddlemon, G.K.; Olson, K.G.   Transport and
fate  of anthracene  in aquatic microcosms.  Publ.  1200.   Oak Ridge,  TN:
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1978.

Habs,  M.; Schmaehl,  D.;  Misfeld,  J.   Local   carcinogenicity of  some
environmentally relevant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons  after lifelong
topical  application  to  mouse  skin.   Arch.   Geschwulstforsch  50(3):
266-2784; 1980.

Harris, S.J.; Bond, G.P.; Neimeir, R.W.   The effects  of  2-nitropropane,
naphthalene and hexachlorabutadiene on  fetal rat development.   Toxicol.
Appl. Pharmacol.  48:A35;  1979.   (Abstract)

Herbes,  S.E.   Transport  and  bioaccumulation  of  polycyclic  aromatic
hydrocarbons  (PAH)   in aquatic  systems.   In   Coal  Technology  Program
Quarterly  Progress  Report  for  the  Period  Ending December  31,  1975.
ORNL-5120.  Oak  Ridge, TN:   Oak Ridge National Laboratory,  1976:  p.65.
(As cited by U.S. EPA 1980c)

Kites,  R.A.;  Laflame, R.E.;  Farrington,  J.W.   Sedimentary  polycyclic
aromatic  hydrocarbons:   the  historical  record.   Science  198:829-831;
1977.  (As cited by Neff;  1979)
                                 2-33

-------
 Hoffman,  D.  et_  al.   Fluoranthenes :   quantitative  determination  in
                                                                activlty-
 Innes, J.R.M.;  Ulland,  B.M. ;  Valerio,  M.G.; Petrucelli,  L. ;  Fishbein,
 L.; Hart,  E.R.;  Pallota,  A.J.;  Bates,  R.R.;  Falk,  H.L.; Gart,  J.J.;
 Klein, M.; Mitchell,  I.;  Peters,  J.  Bioassay  of  pesticides  and indus-
 trial chemicals  for tumorigenicity  in mice:   a preliminary  note.   J
 Natl.  Cancer Inst. 42: 110L-1114;  1969.

 International agency for  Research on Cancer  (IARC) .  Monographs  on the
 evaluation of carcinogenic risk of the chemical to man,  Vol. 3.  Certain
 polycyclic  aromatic hydrocarbons and  heterocyclic  compounds.   Lyon,
 France:   World Health Organization; 1972.

 Kim,  N.K. ; Stone, D.W.  Organic chemicals and  drinking  water.   Albany,
 NY:  New York State  Department of  Health;  1979.

 Knake, E.  Uber schwache geschwulsterzengende wirkung von naphthalin und
 benzol.   Virchows Archiv.  Pathol. Anat.  Physiol.  329:   141: 1956.   (As
 cited  by  U.S.  EPA 1980d)

 Korotkova,  G.P.;  Tokin,  B.P.   Stimulation  of  the  process of  somatic
 embryogenesis  in some porifera  and  coelenterata.  I.  Effect of  carcino-
 genic  agents  on  some porifera.   Acta Biol.  Hungary 19:465-474;  1968
 (As cited by Neff 1979)

 Krstulovic,  A.M.; Rose,  D.M.;  Brown,  P.R.  Distribution of some atmos-
 pheric polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons.   Amer.  Lab.  7:11-18;  1977.

 Legore, R.S.   The effect of Alaskan  crude oil and selected hydrocarbon
 compounds on  embryonic  development of  the  Pacific  oyster, Crassotrea
 gigas.  Doctoral  thesis, Univ.  Washington,  1974.              -

 Lu, P.Y.; Metcalf, R.L. ; Plummer,  N. ; Mandel,  D.  The environmental fate
 of  three  carcinogens:   benzo[a]pyrene, benzidine,  and  vinyl  chloride
 evaluated in  laboratory  ecosystems.  Arch.  Environ. Contam.  Toxicol
 6:129-142; 1977.   (As cited in Neff  1979)

 Mackay,   D.    Finding  fugacity  feasible.   Environ.   Sci.   Technol.
 13:1218-1224;  1979.

 Malins,  D.C.   Pollution  of   the  marine   environment.   Environ.  Sci
 Technol.  14:32-27; 1979.

 Morita, M. ; Ohi,  G.   Paradichlorobenzene in human tissue and atmosphere
 in Tokyo metropolitan area.  Environ. Pollut. 8(4) : 269-274; 1975.

 Moschandreas,  D.J.;  Zabransky,  J. ,  Jr.;   Rector,  H.E.   The effects  of
woodburning  on  the   indoor residential   air quality.   Environ.  Int.
 4:463-468; 1980.
                                   2-34

-------
National  Academy  of  Sciences  (NAS).   Particulate  polycyclic  organic
matter.  Washington, DC:  National Academy of Sciences, 1972.

Neal,  J.;  Rigdon,  R.H.   Gastric  tumors  in mice  fed  benzo[a]pyrene:  a
quantitative study.  Texas Rep. Biol. Med. 25(4):553-557; 1967.

Neff, J.M.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the aquatic environment.
London:  Applied Science Publishers, 1979.

Pancirov, R.J.; Brown, R.A.  Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in marine
tissues.  Environ. Sci.  Technol. 11(10)898-992; 1977.  (As cited by Neff
1979)

Pearson, W.H.;  Oils,  B.L.   Detection  of naphthalene by  the  blue crab,
Callinectes sapidus.  Estuaries 2(l):64-65; 1979.

Peter, S.; Palme,  G.E.; Rohrborn,  G..  Mutagenicity  of polycyclic hydro-
carbons.  III.   Monitoring genetic hazards of  benz[a]anthracene.   Acta
morphologica Acad. Sci.  Hung. 27(3):199-204; 1979.

Poirier,  L.A.;  de  Serres,   F.J.    Initial  National  Cancer  Institute
studies  on  mutagenesis as a  prescreen  for  chemical carcinogens:   An
appraisal.  J.  Natl. Cancer Inst.  62:919-926;  1979.

Quave, S.A.; Mashni,  C.I.; Barth,  E.F.   Biodegradability  studies  with
priority  pollutant organic  compounds.   Cincinnati,  OH:   Environmental
Research Center, U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency; 1980.

Radding,  S.B.;  Mill,  T.;  Gould,  C.W.;  Liv,  D.H.;   Johnson,  H.L.;
Bomberger, D.C.;  Jojo,  C.V.   The  environmental fate of  selected  poly-
nuclear  aromatic  hydrocarbons.   Washington, DC:   Office of  Toxic  Sub-
stances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;  1976.

Rhodes,  E.O.;  Tar and  pitch. In  Kirk-Othmer  Encyclopedia of  Chemical
Technology 1st  Ed., 1954;  Vol. 13; 614-632.

Rigdon, R.H.;  Rennels,  E.G.   Effect of  feeding benzpyrene  on reproduc-
tion  in  the  rat.   Experientia 20:1291;   1964.   (As  cited  by U.S.  EPA
1980c)

Roszinsky-Kocher,  G.; Basler,  A.; Rohrborn, G.   Mutagenicity of  poly-
cyclic hydrocarbons.   V.   Induction of  sister-chromatid exchanges  ^n
vivo.  Mutat. Res. 66:65-67;  1979.

Salaman, M.H.;   Rose,  F.J.C.   Further tests for tumor-initiating activ-
ity:  N,N-di(2-chloroethyl)-p-aminophenylbutyric  acid  (CB  1348)  as  an
initiator  of  skin  tumor   formation  in  the   mouse.   Br.   J.   Cancer
10:363-378;  1956.

Sawicki, E. et  al.  Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon  composition of  the
atmosphere in   some  large  American  cities.   Am.  Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc.  J.
23:137; 1962.   (As cited in U.S.  EPA 1980c)


                               2-35

-------
                                                             5th

                  hT'  ln,itiation ^  aPParently  non-carcinogenic poly-

 inst  50U77-1715;  1973  °nS:   ^'^  *—***«*»•   *•  •&•  Cancer.

                       cited by Poirier and de Serres 1979)

 Simmon,  V.F.; Rosenkranz,  H.S.;  Zeiger, E. ;  Poirier  LA    Mi,i-a,»«<
 activity  of  chemical carcinogens and rented compounds in the  intra?e?i!
 toneal host-mediated assay.  J. Natl. Cancer InsL  62(4) :91l!9l?  1979



                         ,••

 Smith, J.H.; Mabey, W.R.;  Bohonos,  N.:  Holt,  B R • Lee   s  <; •
 !.«.;  Bomb.rger.  D.C.;  Mill,  T.   Environmental pkthways'  of  s'e

      afSicenoffreRShWa"r,,S7arinS-   ?art  n-   "»»«T "Idiel  "
        1978                 Development, U.S. Environmental Protection



                                     ^asss-
                               .
Laboratory,  U.S.  Department of Energy; 1977.

                             °f volatil^ation  in removing  polycyclic
                                  2-36

-------
Survey  of  Compounds Which  Have  Been Tested  for  Carcinogenic Activity.
Bethesda, Maryland:   Department  of Health and  Human Services, National
Cancer Institute; 1961-1967, 1968-1969, 1970-1971, 1972-1973,  1978.

Thomas, R.E.; Rice, S.D.  The  effect  of exposure  temperatures on oxygen
consumption and  opercular breathing rates  of  pink salmon fry exposed to
toluene, naphthalene,  and water-soluble fractions  of Cook  Inlet crude
oil and No. 2 fuel  oil.   Vernberg,  F.J.;  Vernberg,  W.B.; Calabrese, A.;
eds.  Marine Pollution:  Functional Processes.  New  York,  NY:  Academic
Press; 1978.  (As cited by Neff 1979)

U.S. Bureau of the Census.  Statistical abstract of the United States.
Wshington, DC:  U.S. Department of Commerce; 1980.

U.S. Department  of Agriculture  (U.S.D.A.).   Food consumption,  prices,
and expenditures.   Supplement  for  1976  agricultural  economic report No.
138.  Washington, DC:  U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1978.

U.S. Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.).   Food and nutrient intakes of
individuals in  1 day  in the  United  states,  Spring  1977.   Preliminary
Report  No.  2.   Washington,  DC:   Science  and  Education  Administration,
U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1980.

U.S. Department' of Commerce,  Bureau  of the  Census.  U.S.  impacts  for
consumption and  general  imports/TSUSA  commodity  by  country  of  origin.
Report FT  246/Annual,  1978.  Washington,  DC:   U.S.  Government Printing
Office; 1980.

U.S. Department of  Energy (U.S. DOE).   Coke and coal chemicals in 1978.
DOE/EPA-0120(78).   Washington,  DC:   Energy Information  Administration;
1979.

U.S. Department of  Health,  Education, and  Welfare (U.S.  DHEW).  Smoking
and  health:    A  report   of   the   Surgeon  General.   PHS  79-50066.
Washington, DC:   U.S.  Public Health Service,  U.S. Department of  Health,
Education and Welfare; 1979.

U.S.  Environmental   Protection  Agency   (U.S.   EPA).   Needs  survey.
Washington, DC:   Office  of Water  Planning  and  Standards,  U.S.  EPA;
1978a.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.  EPA).  Preliminary assessment
of the  sources,  control  and population exposure  to  airborne polycyclic
organic matter  (POM)  as  indicated by  benzo[ajpyrene (BaP).   Research
Triangle Park, NC:  Office  of  Air  Quality Planning  and  Standards,  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency;  1978b.

U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency (U.S. EPA).  In-depth  studies  on
health and environmental impacts of selected water pollutants.  Contract
68-01-4646.  Washington,  DC:   U.S. EPA 1978c.    (As  cited by U.S.  EPA
1980g)
                                2-37

-------
 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency  (U.S.  EPA).   Emissions assessment
 of  conventional  stationary  combustion  systems.  Vol.  II.   Internal
 combustion sources.  Report  No.  600/7 -79-029 a.   Research Triangle Park,
 nv^.  u.a. £rA
 U.S  Environmental  Protection Agency  (U.S.  EPA).   Comprehensive sludge
 survey  relevant  to  Section 8002 (g)  of the  Resource Conservation  and
 Recovery Act of 1976.  EPA SW-802.   Washington, DC:  U.S. EPA; 1979b.


 U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency  (U.S.   EPA).   Fate  of  priority
 Ho/Hn^m111 Pu";Lcly-owned  treatment works.    Interim  Report.   EPA
 440/2-80-301.  Washington, DC:  Effluent Guidelines  Division,  U.S.  EPA,
 J. 7OxJcl •

 U.S   Environmental Protection  Agency  (U.S.  EPA).   Exposure  analysis
 modeling  system  AETOX1.   Athens,   GA:   Environmental  Systems  Branch,
 Environmental Research Laboratory,  Office  of  Research and  Development,
 u.o.  UrA:
 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Ambient water  quality
 criteria   for  polynuclear   aromatic   hydrocarbons.   Washington,   DC:
 *rite™a  and Standards  Division,  U.S.  EPA;  1980c;  180  pp.  Available
 from  NTIS,  Springfield,  VA: EPA  440/5-80-069.

 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).  Ambient water  quality
 criteria  for  naphthalene.   Washington,  DC:    Criteria   and  Standards
 Division, Office  of Water Regulations  and Standards, U.S. Environmental
                            Available  from NTIS»  Springfield,  VA:   EPA
U.S  Environmental Protection  Agency  (U.S.  EPA).  STORE!  Water Quality
            WashinSton* DC:  Monitoring  and Data Support Division, U.S.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (U.S.  EPA).   Ambient water quality
criteria for acenaphthene .  Washington, DC:  Office of Water Regulations
and Standards, Criteria and  Standards  Division:   1980f.   Available from
NTIS, Springfield, VA:  EPA 440/5-80-015.

U.S Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).   Ambient  water quality
criteria  for  fluoranthene.   Washington,  DC:   Criteria  and  Standards
Division, Office  of  Water Regulations  and  Standards, U.S.  EPA-  1980g
Available from NTIS,  Springfield, VA:   EPA 440/5-80-049.

U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency   (U.S. EPA).  National  household
pesticide usage  study  1976-1977.   EPA  54019-80-002.   Washington,  DC:
Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S.  EPA: 1980h.
                                 2-38

-------
Versar,  Inc.   Water-related environmental  rate of  129  priority pollu-
tants.   Washington,  DC:    Office  of  Water  Planning  Standards,  U.S.
environmental Protection Agency; 1979.

White,  J.B.;  Vanderslice,  R.R.   POM  source  and  ambient  concentration
data:  review and analysis.  Research  Triangle  Park, NC:   U.S.  Environ-
mental Protection Agency,  1980.

Wintrobe, M.M.;  et_  al.   Clinical Hematology. 7th  Ed.  Philadelphia,  PA:
Lea and Febiger; 1974.  (As cited by U.S. EPA 1980d)

Zepp,  R.G.;  Schlotzhauer,  P.F.   Photoreactivity  of selected  aromatic
hydrocarbons in water.  Jones, P.W.; Leber, P.  Eds.   Polynuclear aroma-
tic hydrocarbons.   Ann  Arbor, MI:   Ann Arbor  Science  Pub.; 1979-  on.
141-157.                                                             FF
                                 2-39

-------