United States
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
              Office of Water
              Regulations and Standards (WH-S53)
              Washington DC 20460
May 1981
EPA-440/4-81-020
cvEPA
An  Exposure
and Risk Assessment
for  Phthalate Esters

-------

-------
   2-'01
   PORT DOCUMENTATION  1- *EPOIT NO.
                                                                    ; 3. 4ecl0ienrs Accession Ho.
PAGE i ii'A.-<4'+U/4-cii-UZU {
Itle MM SuotKle
in Exposure and Risk Assessment for Phthalate Esters
)i(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate Di-n-Butyl Phthalate Dimethyl
'hthalate Diethyl Phthalate Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
iutyl Benzyl Phthalate
«rthort« Perwak, J.; Goyer, M. ; Schimke, G.; Eschenroeder , A.;
Fiksel, J.; Scow, K.: and Wallace, D.
•erforming Organization Nemo end Address
irthur D. Little, Inc.
10 Acorn Park
;amfaridge, MA 02140
Sponsoring Organization Name and Addreia
Monitoring and Data Support Division
Dffice of Water Regulations and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460

s. Report Date Final Revision
May 1981
6.
8. Performing Organization Rept, No.
10. Praiect/Taak/Worfc Unit No.
It, Contracted or &nnttQ} No.
(o C-68-01-3857
(G) C-68-01-5949
13. Type of Report & Period Covered
Final
14.
  Supplementary Not**
  Extensive Bibliographies
 . Abttract (Umre 200 words)

 This  report  assesses  the risk  of exposure  to di(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate,  di-n-butyl
 phthalate,   dimethyl  phthalate,  diethyl  phthalate,  di-n-octyl  phthalate,  and  butyl
 benzyl phthalate.   This  study  is part  of  a  program  to identify the  sources  of and
 evaluate exposure  to  129  priority  pollutants.   The  analysis  is based  on  available
 information from government, industry, and technical publications assembled  in May  of
 1981.

 The  assessment includes  an  identification of  releases  to   the environment  during
 production, use,  or disposal of  the substance.    In  addition,  the  fate  of  phthalate
 esters in  the  environment  is considered;  ambient  levels to which various populations
 of  humans  and  aquatic  life are  exposed are reported.   Exposure  levels are  estimated
 and available data  on toxicity  are presented and interpreted.   Information  concerning
 all of these topics is  combined in an assessment  of the  risks  of exposure  to  phthalate
 esters for  various subpopulations.
7. Document AnalysM  a. Descriptor*
 Exposure
 Risk
 Water  Pollution
 Air Pollution
                          Effluents
                          Waste Disposal
                          Food Contamination
                          Toxic Diseases
                          Butyl Benzyl  Phthalate
Phthalate  Esters
Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
Diethyl Phthalate
 Pollutant  Pathways
 Risk Assessment
                                         U.S. EnvironK^n-al  Protection Agency
                                         P.O. £ lor.  5 , T •:' c ~>. r 7  ' 5 •"•' I, - .1:",)
                                           230
                                                          Ltroot,  Eocia 167G
e. COSATI neld/Qrouo

Availability Statement
                                           Qfoicago, 1.L   60604
                      06T
 Release to Public
                                                    19. Security Clau (Thi* fteoort)
                                                          Unclassified
                          21. No. yf ?*«•*
                             175
                                                     ; a. Security CU*> (This ?*«e>
                                                                               22. Price
                                                                                  316.00
• ANSI-Z39.18)
                                      See irmructloni an ^evene
                                                                              OPTIONAL FORM 272 (+-771
                                                                              (Formerly NT1S-35)
                                                                              Oeoartment of Commerce

-------
                                         EPA-440/4-81-020
                                         October 1980
                                         (Revised May 1981)
        AN EXPOSURE AND RISK ASSESSMENT

             FOR PHTHALATE ESTERS
          Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalata
             Di-n-Butyl Phthalate
              Dimethyl Phthalate
              Diethyl Phthalate
             Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
            Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
                      BY

                 Joanne Perwak.
Muriel Goyer, Gerald Schimke, Alan Eschenroeder
 Joseph Fiksel, Kate Scow, and Douglas Wallace
             Arthur D.  Little,  Inc.


                Michael Slimak
                Project Manager
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         U.S. EPA Contract 68-01-3857
                           68-01-5949
 Monitoring and Data Support Division (WH-553)
   Office of Water Regulations and Standards
            Washington, D.C.  20460
   OFFICE OF WATER REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
     OFFICE OF WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT
     U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

-------
                                FOREWORD
      Effective  regulatory  action  for   toxic  chemicals  requires  an
 understanding of the human and environmental risks associated with the
 manufacture, use,  and  disposal of  the  chemical.  Assessment  of risk
 requires a  scientific  judgment about the  probability of harm  to the
 environment resulting from known or potential environmental concentra-
 tions.   The  risk  assessment  process integrates  health effects  data
 (e.g.,  carcinogenicity, teratogenicity)  with  information on exposure.
 The components of exposure include an evaluation of the sources of the
 chemical,  exposure pathways, ambient levels, and  an  identification of
 exposed populations including humans and aquatic life.

      This  assessment was  performed  as part of a  program to determine
 the  environmental  risks  associated with   current  use  and  disposal
 patterns for 65  chemicals and classes  of  chemicals   (expanded  to  129
  priority  pollutants")  named in the  1977 Clean  Water  Act.   It includes
 an  assessment of risk for humans  and aquatic life and is intended  to
 serve as a  technical basis  for developing  the  most appropriate  and
 effective  strategy  for mitigating  these  risks.

      This  document  is  a  contractors'   final  report.   It  has  been
 extensively  reviewed by the individual  contractors ?nd by   the  EPA  at
 several stages  of completion.   Each chapter of the draft was  reviewed
 by  members of the authoring  contractor's senior technical staff  (e.g.,
 toxicologists,  environmental scientists) who  had not previously been
 directly involved  in  the  work.   These  individuals  were  selected by
 management  to be  the technical  peers   of  the chapter  authors.  The
 chapters were comprehensively  checked for  uniformity  in  quality and
 content  by the contractor's  editorial team, which  also was responsible
 for  the production of  the  final report.   The  contractor's  senior
 project  management  subsequently  reviewed   the  final  report  in  its
 entirety.

     At  EPA  a  senior staff  member  was  responsible   for guiding the
 contractors,  reviewing the manuscripts,  and soliciting comments, where
 appropriate,  from  related  programs within  EPA  (e.g.,  Office of Toxic
 Substances,   Research   and  Development,  Air  Programs,   Solid  and
Hazardous  Waste,  etc.).   A complete  draft  was  summarized by  the
assigned  EPA  staff member  and  reviewed  for   technical  and  policy
 implications  with  the  Office Director (formerly  the  Deputy Assistant
Administrator) of Water  Regulations  and   Standards.   Subsequent revi-
sions were included in the final report.
                         Michael W.  Slimak,  Chief
                         Exposure Assessment Section
                         Monitoring  & Data Support Division fWH-553)
                         Office of Water Regulations and Standards

-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                   Page

 List of Figures

 List of Tables

 Acknowledgments
 1.0  TECHNICAL SUMMARY                                             -^


 2.0  INTRODUCTION               .                                   2-1


 3.0  MATERIALS BALANCE                                             3-1

 3.1  Introduction and  Methodology                                   3_i
 3.2  Production                        '                            -  ,

      3.2.1  Manufacturing Process                                   3_3
      3.2.2  Producers  and Production Volume of
            Phthalate  Esters                                        -,  -,
 3.3  Uses                                                           ^Ig
     3.3.1  General Uses                                            2_fi
     3.3.2  Distributed Use of Phthalate Esters                     3.3
 3.4  Releases of Phthalate Esters                                   2-12
     3.4.1  Manufacture                                             3_12
     3.4.2  Transportation                                          3~14
     3.4.3  Formulation and Product Fabrication                     3-15
     3.4.4  Products in Use                                         -, ,<-
     3.4.5  Disposal                                                f^I
3.5   Summary                                                        I~^a
4.0  FATE AND DISTRIBUTION OF PHTHALATE ESTERS
     IN THE ENVIRONMENT                                            4-1

4.1  Monitoring Data                                               ,  ,
     4.1.1  Levels in Water and Sediment                           4 t
     4.1.2  Levels in Soil                                         4_J
     4.1.3  Levels in Air                                           ~
     4.1.4  Levels in Biota
         ^f Phchalata Esters in the Environment
        .1  Methodology
        .2  Physical and Chemical Properties
         3  Face  in Wacar            "  "
                                                                    _

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
     4.2.4  Fate in Air
     4.2.5  Fats in Biota
     4.2.6  Fate in Soil
4.3  Summary                                                     4-18
5.0  HUMAN EFFECTS AND EXPOSURE                                  5-1

5.1  Human Toxicity                                              5-1
     5.1.1  Di(2-Ethylhexyl)  Phthalate (DEEP)                     5-1
     5.1.2  Dimethyl Phthalate (DMP)                             5-6
     5.1.3  Diethyl Phthalate  (DEP)                              5-6
     5.1.4' Di-n-Butyl Phthalate (DBP)                           5.7
     5.1.5  Butyl Benzyl Phthalate (BBP)                          5-7
     5.1.6  Di-n-Octyl Phthalate (DNOP)                           5-8
     5.1.7  Overview                                             5-8
5.2  Human Exposure                                              5-9
     5.2.1  Food                                                 5-9
     5.2.2  Drinking Water  -                                     5-15
     5.2.3  Inhalation                                           5-15
            5.2.3.1  Occupational                                5-15
            5.2.3.2  General  Population                          5-17
     5.2.4  Dermal Absorption                                    5-17
     5.2.5  Medical Exposures                                    5-18
5.3  Summary                                                     5-19
6.0  BIOTIC EFFECTS AND EXPOSURE                                 6-1

6.1  Effects on Biota                                            6-1
     6.1.1  Aquatic Organisms                                    6-1
            6.1.1.1  Considerations in Phthalate
                     Toxicity Studies                            6-1
            6.1.1.2  Relative Toxicity of Phthalates             6-5
            6.1.1.3  Metabolism                                  6-7
     6.1.2  Terrestrial Organisms                                6-8
6.2  Exposure to 3iota                                           6-8
7.0  RISK CONSIDERATIONS

7.1  Methodology
7.2  Human Exposure
7.3  The Carcinogenicity of DEEP
7.4  Human Risks Associatad tfita Other Effects
7.5  Risk to Sioca

-------
                          TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (Continued)
3.0  REFERENCES
APPENDIX A.  Materials Balance Worksheet                            A-l
APPENDIX 3.  Physical-Chemical Properties                           3-1
APPENDIX C.  Fate in Water - Modeling Results                       C-l
APPENDIX D.  Fate in Air - Modeling Results                         D-l
APPENDIX E.  Human Toxicity                                         E-1

-------
                        "  LIST OF FIGURES

Figure
  No.                                                               Page

 3-1   Este-rification of Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate                3-4

 3-2   Total Phthalate Ester Production Supply/Demand
       Relationship,  1977 (Thousand kkg)                           3-10

 3-3   Losses of Phthalates During Production and Use
       (Thousand kkg)                                              3-13

 4-1   Distribution of Ambient Levels of Di(2-£thylhexyl)
       Phthalate (DEHP)                                            4-3

 4-2   Distribution of Ambient Levels of Di-n-butyl
       Phthalate (DBF)                                             4-4

 4-3   Distribution of Ambient Levels of Di-n-octyl
       Phthalate (DNOP)

 4-4   Distribution of Ambient Levels of Dimethyl
       Phthalate (DMP)                                             4-6

 4-5   Distribution of Ambient Levels of Dieth'yl
       Phthalate (DEP)               "                              4-7

 4-6   Summary of Fate Analyses for Di(2-Ethylhexyl)
       Phthalate (DEHP)                                            4-20

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES

Table
 No.

 1-1   Estimates of Carcinogenic Risk for Various Routes
       of Exposure to Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate                   1-2

 3-1   Total Capacity of Phthalate Production,  1977                3-5

 3-2   U.S.  Production of Phthalate Ester Plasticizers             3-7

 3-3   Applications for Phthalate Esters                            3-9

 3-4   Primary Assumptions Used in Materials Balance
       Analysis for Phthalate Esters                               3-19

 3-5   Annual Phthalate Losses to the Environment in
       the United States                                           3-20

 3-6   Annual Phthalate Releases to Environmental
       Compartments in the United States                            3-21

 4-1   Phthalate .Esters in Water and Sediment                      4-2

 4-2   Mean Phthalate Ester Environmental Levels in
       Water and Sediment                                          4-8

 4-3   Residues of Phthalate Esters in Aquatic  Organisms           4-10

 4-4   California Air Resources Board Reactivity
       Classification of Organic Compounds,  1976                   4-16

 5-1   Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Neoplastic
       Nodules in Fischer 344 Rats Fed Di(2-Ethylhexyl)
       Phthalate (DEHP)  in the Diet for Two  Years                  5-3

 5-2    Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Adenoma in
       B6C3F1 Mice Fed Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP)  in
       the Diet for Two  Years                                      5-4

 5-3    Approved Uses of  Phthalate Esters  That Could Result
       in Migration into Foods

 5-4    Approved Uses of  Phthalate Esters  That Under Normal
       Conditions of Use would not Reasonably 3e Expected
       to Result in Migration Into Foods                            5-12

 5-5    Residues of Di(2-Sthylhexyl)  Phthalate (DEHP)  in  Foods       5-13

 5-6    Consumption of Di(2-Ethylhexyl)  Phthalate (DEHP in Food      5-14

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

Table
 No.                                                                Page

 5-7   Concentrations of Phthalate Esters in Drinking Water        5-16

 6-1   Reported Effects of Phthalate Esters on Fish                6-2

 6-2   Reported Effects of Phthalate Esters on Aquatic
       Invertebrates                                               6-3

 6-3   The Relative Toxicity of Phthalates to Aquatic Organisms    6-6

 7-1   Exposure of Humans to Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate            7-3

 7-2   Carcinogenic Effects of Di(2-Ethylhexyl)  Phthalate
       in B6C3F1 Mice                                              7-5

 7-3   Per Capita Lifetime Carcinogenic Risk to  Humans Due
       to Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate Ingestion at Various
       Exposure Levels Estimated by Use of Four  Extrapolation
       Models                                                      7-8

 7-4   Per Capita Lifetime Carcinogenic Risk to  Specific
       Populations In the U.S.  Due to Estimated  Di(2-Ethyl-
       hexyl) Phthalate Exposure                                   7-9

 7-5   Effects of Phthalate Esters on Laboratory Animals           7-10

 7-6   Calculated Allowable Daily Intake and Recommended
       Water Quality Criteria for Phthalate Esters                 7-12

 A-l   Materials Balance Worksheet for Phthalate Esters
       (thousand kkg/yr)                                          A_2

 B-l   Properties of Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate                  B-2

 B-2   Properties of Di-n-Butyl Phthalate                         B-3

 B-3   Properties of Dimethyl Phthalate                           B-4

 B-4   Properties of Diethyl Phthalate                            3-5

 B-5   Properties of Di-n-Octyl Phthalate                         B-6

 3-6   Properties of Butyl Benzyl Phthalate                       3-7

 C-l   Time Required co Reach 99% of Steady State,
       Sediment and Water Concentrations at 99%
       Steady State and Half-Lives Estimated From
       Decay Simulation for the Whole System.                     c-2
                                  viii

-------
                          LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

Table
 No.                                                                Page

 C-2    Half-Lives and % Load for the Chemical, Biological,
       and Export Processes for DMP and DEHP in Five
       Simulated Ecosystems                _                        O4

 2-1    Chromosome Aberrations and Sister-Chromatid Exchange
       (SCE)  Produced by DEHP                                      E-6

 E-2    Chromosome Aberrations and Sister-Chromatid Exchange
       (SCE)  Produced by DBP                                       E-7

 E-3    Antifertility and Mutagenic Effects  of DEHP in
       Male Mice                   •                                E-15

 E-4    Relative Organ Weights of Rats  Fed DEHP                     E-18

 E-5    Acute  Toxicity of Phthalate Esters                          E-27

 E-6    Human  Tissue  Concentrations                          *       E-33

-------
                             ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
      The Arthur D.  Little,  Inc.  task manager for this study was Joanne
 Perwak.   Other major contributors  were Muriel Goyer (Human Effects),
 Alan Eschenroeder (Environmental Fate),  Gerald Schimke (Materials
 Balance),  Douglas Wallace (Biotic  Effects and Exposure),  Kate Scow
 (Biological Fate),  Melba Wood (Monitoring Data), Joseph Fiksel (Risk
 Considerations),  Laura Williams  (Editor), and Alfred Wechsler (Technical
 Review).  Irene Rickabaugh  was responsible for typing and preparation
•of the final draft  report.

-------
                     CHAPTER 1.0  TECHNICAL  SUMMARY
      The Monitoring and Data Support Division, Office of Water Regulations
 and Standards, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is conducting an
 ongoing program to identify the sources of, and evaluate the exposure to
 129 priority pollutants.  This report assesses the exposure to and risk
 associated with six phthalate esters:  di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEEP),
 di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) ,  dimethyl phthalate (DMP). diethy1 phthalate
 (DEP), jii-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP), and butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP).
 Most of the conclusions this report are for DEHP, since most of the
 data available are for this  compound.

      This work was originally completed in September, 1979.  The current
 report  has been revised to  include recent toxicological data (e.g.
 carcinogenicity)  and a re-evaluation of human risk.   Other aspects of
 the report have not been updated since the original date of completion.

 RISK CONSIDERATIONS

      Humans:   Until recently,  typical DEHP exposure  levels  of  0.3  mg/day,
 and maximum exposure levels  of  about 10 mg/day were  not  thought  to be of
 much concern.   These exposures  were  primarily attributed to food contami-
 nation  resulting  from processing  and packaging.   Levels  at  which acute
 and reproductive  effects  are observed are  much higher even  than maximum
 exposure  levels,  although the relationship between humans and  animals
 regarding  reproductive  effects  is  unclear.   Re-evaluation of these con-
 clusions  is, however, necessary as a result of recent evidence suggesting
 the carcinogenicity  of  DEHP.

     The relative  carcinogenic  risks  of  the major DEHP exposure routes
 are shown  in Table 1-1, using the range  of  risks estimated with various
 extrapolation models.   Considerable controversy exists concerning  the
 most appropriate method for  extrapolating  equivalent  human doses from
 animal data.  Due to this uncertainty, the  range of risk estimated by
 the various models may under- or overestimate  the actual risk to man
 Overestimation appears more  likely due to  the  conservative assumptions
 utilized in the calculation  of human equivalent doses.

     Food represents the major  source of exposure and risk to DEHP.  Risks
 associated with inhalation and consumption  of  drinking water appear to
be  lower,  but monitoring data are limited.

     Certain subpopulations   receive higher exposures and are thus at
higher risk because of DEHP   exposure.  For example,  persons receiving
large quantities of blood or who are dialyzed  regularly can be  exposed
 to^high  levels  of DEHP through medical tubing  in hemodlalysis equipment
and  other biomedical devices.

-------
                    TABLE 1-1.  ESTIMATES OF CARCINOGENIC RISK FOR VARIOUS ROUTES
                                OF EXPOSURE TO DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
Jliiiiti!

Typical Diet
                             Average DEHP
                            Level* (mg/day)

                                0.3
                Population
                   Size*

                221 x 106
           Average Lifetime     Estimated Incidence***
           Per Capita Risk**   (excess cancers/year)
             4xlO~6 to 4xlO~5
                        13 - 130
Drinking water
                                0.02
                221 x 106
             lxlO~6 to 3xlO~6
                         3-10
Ambient air - urban

            - rural
0.006
0.00006
166 x 106
55 x 106
3xlO~ 7 to 8xlO~ 7
3xlO~9 to 8xlO~9
0.7 - 2
0.002-0.006
lilood transfusion

            - dialysis

            - hemophilia
21 -45

0.7 - 2.1
4 x 10
2 x 10
1x10 3 to 9x10 3

lxlO~5 to 3x10-4
                                                                                      0.6 - 6

                                                                                      0.003 - 0.08
  * Data taken from Section 5.2 of this report.

 ** Represents the range of per capita lifetime risk predicted
    by several extrapolation models.   See Chapter 7.0 of this report.  The range of risk estimated
    by the various models may under- or overestimate the actual risk to man.  Overestimation appears
    likely due to the conservative assumptions utilized in the calculation of human equivalent doses.

A*A Assuming a 70-year lifespan.

-------
      Data on  the effects and  exposure  to  the  other  phthalate  esters  are
 limited.  Only BBP has been tested  for carcinogenicity,  and  the  prelimi-
 nary results  appear negative.  DEP  and DBF  show  evidence of  teratogenicitv
 in laboratory animals as does DEHP.  Testicular  injury has been  observed '
 for DBP, as well as for DEHP.  The  risks  associated with the  other
 phthalate esters are expected to be considerably lower than DEHP, because
 or their more limited use.   However, the  paucity of data provides little
 basis for quantitative or even qualitative  statements of risk  regarding
 these other chemicals.
      3iota:  Tne concentrations of phthalate esters that affect aquatic
 organisms in laboratory studies are not commonly found in natural waters.
 Data appear to indicate, however, that reproduction in Daphnia is
 inhibited at 3 ug/1 for DEHP.  Levels in this range are commonly found
 in the United States.   However, more data are required to establish risk
 to aquatic organisms.   Specifically, confirmation of the effects of
 phthalate esters, as well as information regarding laboratory contami-
 nation in monitoring data, are needed.

 MATERIALS BALANCE

      In 1977, the U.S.  production of all phthalate esters amounted to
 546,000 kkg, with about 478,000 kkg used in various flexible poly-
 vinylchloride applications.  DEHP, which was primarily used in poly-
 vinylchloride applications, accounted for about 1/3 of the total produc-
 Cu°n S 1F7*   Production of DPB» DEP,  DMP,  and DNOP accounted for less
 than 57, of the total production output  ia 1977.   BBP,  used primarily in
 vinyl flooring,  is estimated to account for about 11% of production
 DEP  and DMP are used in the manufacture of celluloid.   DMP is also used
 as an insect repellent.   Although DBP has  diverse uses,  it is primarily
 used as a plasticizer for epoxy resins  and polyvinylchloride applications
 Discharge of phthalate  esters occurs at various  points during production
 and_use.   Between 70 and 90% of each of the  esters  ultimately is  disposed
 oi in landfills.   Most  of these esters  are  in the form of products
 Losses  of phthalate  esters  during production are small,  but  may be
 important in localized  areas since there are few production  facilities.
 During  compounding of esters to plasticizers,  losses  to  air  and water
 are  significant.   For DMP,  the  non-plasticizer routes  to  air and water
 are  the major  loss route.   For  the five esters,  DEHP,  DEP, DBP, DMP, and
 BBP   an average of 3% is  released  to  the air, 3% to water, 90% to land-
 rills,  and  3%  is  incinerated.

 PHTHALATE ESTERS  IN THE ENVIRONMENT

     Monitoring data for phthalate esters in the environment are scarce
and are complicated by the prevalence of laboratory and sampling
contamination.  Ambient  water levels are gsnerallv less than 10 ug/i
Higher levels of these chemicals, primarily DEHP and DBP, are found^'
industrialized areas.  Concentrations of 56 sg/kg DEHP in sediment -
seen  reported, although  levels of Less than 1 ag/kg are probablv
common.

-------
     Levels or DEHP and DBF in air range from 0.5 ng/m3 to 3 ng/m3  in
unpolluted areas, although only limited data are available.  Levels of
DEHP and DBF in the vicinity of" a municipal incinerator were approximately
300 ng/m-* and 700 ng/m3, respectively.

     Phthalate esters  are  consistently  found at  low levels in  biota.
Maximum levels in  fish range  from 1 mg/kg  to 7 mg/kg;  however, most
reported levels  of DEHP and DBF are generally below 1  rug/kg.

     The fate of phthalate esters in  the aquatic environment depends  on
the  particular ester.   DEHP is thought  to  be the most  persistent.   The
major  loss mechanisms  of DEHP are accumulation in the  sediment and
export;  however, in a  steady-state system,  export is thought to be  the
major  loss mechanism.   Biodegradation and  hydrolysis of other  esters
make them less persistent  in  the  environment than DEHP.

     Phthalate esters  disposed of in  landfills are primarily in the form
of intact consumer products, with migration occurring  relatively slowly.
Esters  released  from these products would  be subject to biodegradation
and  leaching.

     Hydroxyl radical  attack  is the primary loss mechanism for phthalate
esters  in the atmosphere.  Adsorption to particulates  and  rainout are
not  expected  to  be important  loss mechanisms.
                                  i—"4

-------
                            2.0  INTRODUCTION
      The  Office  of  Water  Regulations  and  Standards,  Monitoring and Data
 Support Division, the U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency is conducting
 a  program to  evaluate the exposure  to and risk of  129  priority pollu-
 tants  in  the  nation's environment.  The risks  to-be  evaluated" include
 potential  harm to human beings and  adverse effects on  fish and other
 biota.  The goal of  the task under  which  this  report has  been prepared
 is to  integrate  information on cultural and environmental flows  of
 specific priority pollutants and estimate the  risks  based on  receptor
 exposure  to these substances.  The  results  are  intended to serve as  a
 basis  for  developing suitable regulatory  strategy for  reducing the risk,
 if such action is indicated.
     This report provides a brief, but comprehensive, summary of the
manufacture, use, distribution, fate, effects, and potential risks of
several phthalate esters.  In order to effectively use this report and
to understand the uncertainties and qualifications of the data presented
herein, several important underlying definitions and assumptions must be
presented.

     •  Phthalate esters include  a large group of compounds;
        six are considered here:

             Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate - DEHP
             Di-n-butyl phthalate - DBF
             Dimethyl phthalate - DMP
             Diethyl phthalate - DEP
             Di-n-octyl-phthalate - DNOP
             Butyl  benzyl phthalate - BBP

     •   The  term di-octyl phthalate, as  reported in the
        literature,  often refers to either  DEHP or DNOP.
        In this  report,  di-octyl phthalate  is  used if the
        identity of  the  chemical considered is unknown.

     •   This  report  deals  primarily with  DEHP  since this chemical
        has the  largest  production  of those considered, and  is
        the most  persistent in  the  environment.  In addition,
        research  has  concentrated primarily on DEHP in the past.
        We have  included information for  the other phthalates
        when  available.

     t   Monitoring data  for phthalate esters are limited as
        has been  the  case  for many  trace organics.   Further,
        the analysis  for phthalates is even ^ore complicated
        by contamination in sampling and laboratory analysis,
        since phchalate escerj ara used in  plastic' cubing and
       containers found frequently in sampling and analvsis

-------
        equipment.  Background contamination  levels  in
        monitoring results are pointed out  to  the  extent
        possible.  When these concentrations  are not
        mentioned, the level of contamination  is unknown.

     This work was originally completed in  September  1979.   The current
report has been revised to include recent toxicological data and a
re-evaluation of human risk.  Other aspects  of  the  report have not been
updated since the original date of completion.

     This report is organized as follows:


     Chapter 3.0 presents a materials balance  for  the phthalate  esters
considered here, including information on production, use, and disposal.

     Chapter 4.0 uses two points of view to examine the concentration
of phthalates in the environment.  First, existing monitoring data are
summarized.  Second,  the significance and rates of various environmental
fate processes are considered in a modeling format, along with calcula-
tions to estimate possible environmental concentrations using loadings
based upon materials Balances.   Comparisons of monitoring results and
fate estimates .are made where possible.

     Chapter 5.0 summarizes the effects  and exposure of humans to
phthalate esters.

     Chapter 6.0 reviews the effects and exposure of aquatic organisms
to phthalate esters.
                                       •
     Chapter 7.0 integrates the information presented in earlier sections
to address the risks  to humans  and aquatic species  resulting from expo-
sure to phthalate esters.

-------
                          3.0  MATERIALS BALANCE
  3.1   INTRODUCTION AND  METHODOLOGY  '

       This  chapter presents  the  environmental  materials  balance  for six
  phthalate  esters  in  the contiguous  United  States.   The  materials  balance
  summarizes  the principal sources, uses,  and environmental  releases of
  pnthalate  esters  to  all environmental media.  Phthalate esters  are
  released into the  environment from  both  anthropogenic and  natural sources.
  For major  sources  of pollutant  release,  the amount  of material  released
  is estimated, the  environmental compartment (air, water, and land)  ini-
  tially receiving and transporting the material are  identified,  and  the
  locations at which the pollutant loadings  take place are specified  to the
  degree possible.  Data are cited to establish bases for estimates.  Where
  discrepancies occur, the highest figure has been assumed in order  to
 maintain a more conservative approach.

      Anthropogenic sources of phthalate esters are widely distributed
 throughout the environment as a result of the incorporation of phthalates
 into consumer products, especially those derived from plasticized poly-
 vinylchloride (PVC) and other plastics.   Phthalate esters may be released
 to the environment not only through their manufacture,  but also through
 processing, use,  and disposal of plastic products containing them.  Some
 of the minor end-uses,  e.g.,  as  a carrier for  pesticides or as  an insect
 repellent,  may also release the  substances  into  the environment, which
 may result  in direct  human  exposure.

      In addition  to anthropogenic  sources,  observations  of  natural
 occurrences of phthalates  in vegetation  and animal  life  have been  made
 (Mathur 1974).   In some instances, however, such  occurrences may result
 from  contamination by materials  used in  handling  and testing specimens.
 Thus,  the attributable  factors to  the natural  prevalence of phthalate
 esters  are  unclear (Graham  1973, Mathur  1974,  Peakall 1975).

     Data enabling  the  development of an  accurate materials  balance
 do  not  exist.  Production values are available for  four  of  the six
 phthalate esters of interest, i.e.,  di(2-ethylhexyl), di-n-butyl,  diethyl,
 and dimethyl  phthalate; and it has been possible to  estimate  the produc-
 tion of butyl benzyl  phthalate.  No  substantive data on  the  production of
 di-n-octyl phthalate have been found.  Data concerning the amounts  of
 individual phthalates that are used  in individual end-product categories
 do not exist.  In general,  however, phthalate esters are used as plasti-
 cizers, primarily with PVC.  Production figures are available or can be
 estimated for five phthalate esters.   These figures account for nearly
 aO* or tne total phthalate astar production in Che United States (U s"
 International Trade Commission 1963-1978).  Since much of the ^nforma-'on
on pncnalata use in products is presented on an aggregated basis  -t has
oeen necessary to sake certain assumptions in  order to asc-'siat- -he
amount of each type of ester that encars  Che environment  through various
pathways.   The rollowing procedure was used:
                                   j—i

-------
     •  The production and  use  patterns  of phthalate esters
        in the United  States  were  developed from available
        literature.

     •  1977 production and export data  for all phthalates
        (including the five  of interest),  and production data
        for each of  the five  individual  phthalates were used.
        Assuming that  the export of phthalates is proportional
        to the amount  produced,  the U.S.  supply of each of the
        five of interest was  estimated.

     •  Using available data, estimates  were made of the  .
        distribution of each  of the phthalates among non-
        plasticizer  uses, PVC plasticizer uses, and other
        polymer uses.

     •  An estimate  of the  fraction of each ester in various
        product categories  was  made.

     •  Losses resulting from transportation,  vaporization, and
        manufacturers' waste  were  estimated and the amount
        of plasticizer appearing in the  inventory each year
        was estimated.

     •  The annual loss rate  of plasticizer to the air or water
        was estimated  by product category and multiplied by the
        products' lifetime.

     •  The amount of  ester remaining after accounting for the
        above losses was assumed to enter the municipal solid
        waste stream and be disposed of  — 97% landfilled,
        3% incinerated.

     •  The total amount of each ester entering into each
        environmental  compartment  was estimated by summing
        various contributions.

     In these calculations, steady-state conditions are assumed.  This
chapter presents information on the sources and quantities of phthalates
and the routes of entry of  these substances into the environment.
Primary and secondary  sources of information have been utilized in the
analysis.  These sources include documents prepared by various federal
agencies, including the U.S.  EPA,  Department of Commerce, and other
agencies, as well as personal contacts with their representatives.  In
some cases, contacts with  industry have  been made.  The following sec-
tions address the manufacture,  transportation, production, use, and
disposal of phthalate esters, and the release of these substances into
environmental compartments.
                                  3-2

-------
 3.2  PRODUCTION

 3.2.1  Manufacturing Process

      The esterification of phthalic anhydride with the appropriate
 alcohol is the basic process for producing phthalate esters.  The reac-
 tions occur in the presence of esterification catalysts, including
 sulfuric acid or p-toluenesulfonic acid.   The process is essentially
 the same for all lower alcohols.  The excess alcohol usually employed
 in the process is recovered and readily recycled.   Generally, production
 has been by the batch method;  however, newer plants are highly automated
 and operate on a continuous basis.   Reactions  are carried out at a
 temperature of about 150°C, with agitation (Lowenheim and  Moran 1975).   As
 noted in Figure 3-1, water, as  a byproduct of the reaction, is either
 recovered or becomes wastewater.  Physical losses  of the product probably
 occur during washing/steaming  operations  and in filtering.  Catalysts are
 removed in a washing step.   At that time, any volatile impurities are
 removed as vapors and condensed.  The product is then purified by vacuum
 distillation and/or with activated  charcoal to meet purity requirements
 for plasticizer use.   Yields of products  from- the  process  are >9Q%,  which
 is  relatively high (Hirzy et_ al.  1978).

      For  each phthalate  ester,  modifications  may be required  in the
 process,  particularly in the alcohol  recovery step.   In the production
 of  dimethyl and diethyl  phthalates, alcohol recovery may be more compli-
 cated because of benzene  that  is used to reduce the partial  pressure of
 the  alcohol.   This  necessitates  the removal and  separation of  the ternary
 mixture of alcohol,  water,  and  benzene.   Benzene is returned  to the
 process and the alcohol  is  rectified  for  reuse (Lowenheim  and  Moran  1975).
 In  the process  for  di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, alcohol  recovery is simpler
 and  this  step may be  eliminated.

 3.2.2  Producers and Production Volume of Phthalate  Esters

      Production  of  phthalate ester plasticizers  is  concentrated  among
 a small group of companies, largely merchant producers.  It is  believed
 that  19 companies have some phthalate  ester production capacity.
 However,  it  is  also estimated that six of these  companies  account for
 approximately 90% of  the  total phthalate  ester capacity, which  is esti-
 mated  at  about  817,200 kkg  for 1977.   Because of the nature of  the
 production  process  and the  fact  that  installations  can be  used  to produce
 other  types  of  plasticizers and  even  non-plasticizer products,  the
 capacity  for phthalate esters is variable.  Table 3-1 presents  capacities
 of the major producers and  the phthalate ester products for each company.

     The existing phthalate ester production capacity is concentrated
 in the Gulf Coast (Texas and Louisiana) and in the Northeast (New
Jersey and Pennsylvania).  The combined capacities of plants in  these
 regions represent about 35Z of the cotal industry.   Plants are also
 located in other states, including Ohio, Tennessee, Maryland, Illinois,
Connecticut, North Carolina, and New York.
                                  3-3

-------
                      FIGURE  3-1.   ESTERIFICATION OF  DI (2-ETHYLIIEXYL) PHTIIALATE
Mo I Wt.
                           0
                       V—C'
                                                      P-Toluene-

                                                     Sulfonic  Acid
          y-c
          ^\
             0
Phthalic Anhydride



      U8
  Octyl Alcohol






      130



(2-ethylhexanol)
                                                                                            0
                                                                                           0
                                                                                            PlichalaLu
Source:   Darby (1968), Graham (1973).

-------
                7A3LZ 3-1.   TOTAL CAPACITY 07 PHTHALAT2 PaODUCTIOH, 1977
 Company and Location

 3AS5 Vyandotta Core.
 South .
-------
      In  1977,  production of phthalate  asters  amounted  to  546,000  kkg,
with  about 478,000  '
-------
                 TABLE 3-2.   U.S.  PRODUCTION OF PHTHALATE

                             ESTER PLASTICIZERS
                           Annual Production  (Thousand kkz)

1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
Di
(2-ethyl-
hexyl)
150.0
161.3
159.1
175.4
197.5
171.7
176.9
137.3
134.7
181.7
176.'13

Dibutvl
13.4
15.7
10.4
10.4
13.2
17.2
16.1
5.6
6.2
7.5
Jl

Diethvl
10.3
10.2
9.4
7.6
8.6
8.9
8.9
5.3
7.3
7.9
.

Dimethyl
3.0
3.3
3.7
4.8
4.4
5.1
4.5
3.1
4.0
4.5


Other Butyl- 9
Dioctvl benzvl~
6.9 45.4
-
-
47.7
_
3.7
2.5 56.3
4.5
7.8
5.3 60.0


Total Phthalate
Ester Plastic
381.6
401.2
388.2 "
444.1
520.1
546.2
548.1
410.3
473.5
545.9

 Includes dicapryl phthalate and dioctyl isophthalate.

2
 Source:  Arthur D. Little, Inc., estimates.



 Preliminary includes di(2-ethylhexyl) and other dioctyl phthalates,
Source:   U.S.  International Trade Commission (1968-1978).

-------
         Plasticization occurs  during  fabrication when
         the temperature reaches  about 160°C.

      •  Plastisol formation ~ Plastisols,  a  stable  liquid  •
         dispersion of  resin in plasticizer, as  formed during
         this  process.

      •  Resin dissolution — The dissolution  of  the  resin  in a
         solvent  is followed by mixture with a plasticizer  to
         make  solvent cast film and surface  coating materials.
         The compounding of  the resin  and plasticizer takes place
         at  converting  plants where flexible PVC  products are
         formed.   It has been estimated that approximately  8000
         plants convert  plastic resins and additives  into finished
         consumer products (U.S.  Bureau of the Census 1976).  Of
         these, some 5-10% are  manufacturers of flexible PVC
         products.

3.3.2  Distributed Use  of Phthalate Esters

     Examples of end-use applications of the  subject phthalate esters
are presented in Table  3-3.   Phthalate esters are used as plasticizers
to develop certain characteristics,  and to exhibit varying properties
in a specific end use.   Not all phthalate ester plasticizers have
similar applications in any given end use.   For example, DEHP is
widely used as a plasticizer for certain types of electrical wire and
cable  insulation, although  it  is not suitable for cable applications
where  performance standards require aging of  the insulation at 136-1538C.
Where  aging in this temperature range is required, substitution of other
phthalic acid derivatives (e.g.,  ditridecyl or diundecyl phthalate)
occurs (Beeler and Finney 1978).   Since DBP has a relatively high vola-
tility, it is unsuitable for application in electrical wire and cable
insulation, or other applications (e.g.,  automotive)  where exudation or
volatilization of the plasticizer would be a problem.

     Because of the relatively  low volume of production for some of  the
subject compounds, data on end  use by market segment  are not detailed,
except in the case of flexible  PVC.   The supply-demand relationships
indicated in Figure 3-2 are for all phthalate esters.  The six phthalates
of interest represent about 50% of the total U.S. output, and are assumed
to represent a proportional share of demand.  Allocation of consumption
in each end-use market  by specific phthalate ester,  for the most part,
can only be indicated in a qualitative manner.  Figure 3-2 summarizes
the end-use pattern for all phthalate esters produced.  While insuffi-
cient data are available to document the  amount  of the individual ester
consumed in each product group, the  specific uses of  each phthalate  aster
of concern are described below.

     As noted previously, DEHP  is considered Che  standard PVC plasti-
cizer and is primarily  used  for this  purpose.   It is  preferred  for
numerous  reasons, including: a high  degree  of compatibility with
                                  3-3

-------
                TABLE 3-3.  APPLICATIONS FOR PHTHALATE ESTERS
                                                       Phthalate Ester
Plasticizer
  Polyvinyl Chloride

      Vinyl Film and Sheeting
      Vinyl Wire and Cable Insulation
      Vinyl Flooring
      Other Vinyl Applications
        Other Extrusions
        Injection Molded Items
        Plastisols
  Other Polymers and Resins

      Polyvinyl Acetates,
       Formals, Butyrals
      Cellulosics
      Polysulfides
      Polyurethanes
      Other  •
Other Uses'
      Perfumes and Cosmetics
      Insect Repellent
      Solvent
      Pigment Adjuster
      Concrete Additive
      Microbiocide
      Denaturant. Alcohol
a*
3
o

X
X

X
X


X










O>
=3
CO
*


X



X

x •
X








0-
u
^








X



X

X



X
Oi
i







•
X


X
1
X





CJ
S3
e






x -
X
X

X




X
X


0
z
XL
















X
,
  I
  "Product group unspecified.
  o
  'Phthalate esters are used in those applications  as  carrier,
   dispersing media,  fixatives,  additives,  denaturants,  adjusting  agencs,
   (see text).
  Source:  Sealer  and Finnev  (1973).

-------
1977
Total U.Sr
Production
545.9
     U.S. Supply
     503.4
    •Exports
     42.5

    •Oioctyl
     Phthalates
     4.4-
                            •Other Polymers and
                             Resins 15.0
                               -^•Cellulosics
                               -*-Polyvinylacetates
                               -^Polyurethanes
                               -*-Other
   PVC
   Use as Plasticizer <
   478.0

  • Carr i er/D ispersi ng
   Media  10.5
-^•Pesticides
•^Cosmetics
—^Colorants
—^-Catalysts
    »0ther Phthalate Anhydride
     Esters 38.1
                                                              •Building and Construction
                                                               122.2
                                    •Home Furnishings and     >
                                     Housewares 91.0
                                                              • Electrical 87.6
                                 —^Transportation 70.0
                                                          —» Apparel 47.7-
                                 —+. Recreation 20.6
                                                          —»• Packaging 7.0
                                                          I—*• Miscellaneous 10.5
•Other PVC Uses 21.6
                                                                     Flooring 108.1
                                                                     Pool Liners 6.8
                                                                     Weather Stripping 7.
                                                                                              •Wall Coverings, etc.
                                                                                              Furniture 53.6
                                                                                              Housewares 18.1
                                                                    Wire and Cable 87.6
                            i—*• Auto Mats  \  16.2
                            |—+> Auto Tops  j
                            '—»• Upholstery and Seat
                                Covers 53.6
                                                                    • Baby Pants 3.2
                                                                    • Footwear 30.4
                                                                    •Outerwear  14.1
                                Toys 12.2
                               m Sporting Goods 8.4
                                CFilm 7.0
                                Sheet na
C                                Garden Hose 5.0
                                Medical Tubing 5.5
•Tools and Hardware
• Laminates
•Novelties
•Stationery Supplies
Note: The six subject phthalates accounted
      for approximately 50% of 1977 production
na * Not available
Source:  Versar  (1978).
                               Figure 3-2 TOTAL PHTHALATE ESTER PRODUCTION  SUPPLY/DEMAND
                                          RELATIONSHIP, 1977 (Thousand kkgj
                                                             3-10

-------

  tura, flexibility, and =omp«ibiU» wih PVC     •
  Such plasticizan are derived from hl^Lf  ?M1M  (Anon5™ous
  or other sources, such « «MTlI^.5    "olecular "SighC linear alcohols,
      continue to
                                         7   "
                                                     MhUe DEHB has-
                            P'   1"

                                                    capacitors  is  a


polyvinyiidene  loride

                                           n of other polymers, such
                                                                     as
typical Process
                                 3-11

-------
pigments; use  as a  concrete additive  to  impart workability and other
mechanical  properties; use in polyvinyl  acetate  emulsions; and it is
registered  with U.S. EPA as an insect repellent.  No  specific  informa-
tion  is available on these miscellaneous uses.

      Primarily, BBP is used in vinyl  flooring as a  plasticizer.   It is
preferred for  this  use because of its resistance to staining and  migra-
tion  into,  and softening of, flooring adhesives.  Other applications
for BBP include use in vinyl coatings, polyvinyl acetate  adhesives,
and acrylic caulking compounds.

      Like other phthalate esters, DNOP has been used  as a plasticizer
for PVC.  However,  little information is available regarding either  the
volume of production or the extent of  its use in this application.

3.4   RELEASES OF PHTHALATE ESTERS

      The release  of phthalates into  the environment  occurs during  the
manufacturing process,  transportation, product formulation and fabrica-
tion, product use, and product disposal.

      The range of products containing phthalates is extremely broad  and
includes products with lifetimes varying from less than a  year to several
decades.  Virtually all phthalate esters produced are incorporated into
other products.  Some 98% of the U.S. supply is incorporated into various
plastic products; most of these are ultimately deposited at landfill
sites.  The remaining 2% is distributed among pesticides,  cosmetics,
colorants, catalysts,  perfumes,  solvents, etc.  Since some of these
materials are applied directly to human skin, they are eventually dis-
charged into publicly owned treatment works (POTWs)  when they are washed
off.

      Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.5 describe the basis for the assumptions
used to estimate environmental releases.

3.4.1  Manufacture

     The loss of phthalate esters during their manufacture from the
phthalate anhydride is  unknown,  but it has been estimated as less than
0.5% of total production (Hirzy _et_ _al. 1978).   The  same authors report
that water from the secondary  treatment facility  at  one production
facility contains concentrations  of 1-2 ug/1,  but that the major portion
of the process losses  are captured in the sludge.

     On the other hand,  Versar (1978) reports an  estimate of 0.2% of
production lost either  in the  wastewater stream from decanting, or in
the vacuum columns used  in purification.   However,  this may not include
all the process losses.   Therefore,  for this  analysis, production
losses are assumed to  amount  co  0.5£ of the U.S.  supply of phthalaca
esters.  Noca thac these losses  do noc appear on  Figure 3-3, because
they  take place before  phthalata  production statistics are compiled.
                                 3-12

-------

I npBi"»w»i3«(
9T, MWun \|
^
s n >'i'm -yl
90"V ' L




{Orwnunu,
99 »'IP«i1 \
i o »t'm -y
1 O "¥/








roMy/





q 1 pwiauniii
* O9 WIPW-I A *
•-« ^ "





9 »M Ni|pw| A

1Z-V

1 0 ll'lpw-K
(miiii,,,, 900«V
liK|mt,|n| -.— ...
«e



e o w«m-f^
IO'1'Hl
* ion»«i,t J 1 o »v^
_jrj





r
	 1 0 »l««Kj
«'"I"""I J 90 0"V'"|
I
— !J?_J



"Vj
i i n'tp""!^
	 	 	 I 1 *lf»xJ
"t"yi 1 	
9Z9 1



» OP»I*«KII1U| l~~
9SI|i|P"'t/[_

""""""1 I BfV^L
"P"M«1 1 —
9111 j
"

^ '" 1
| »"'M "oilMuqt.} |\
s 10 B"ip«no(1iuo3
-" H"ll"PP
llutinfipMimd,^ \_





" 1
•l"« oolimiqi.1 fy
' v
I'l DuipimoriuMj I \
	 -__ 	 1 ^^



«e
•l"m«™WM«|».| .

•"""PpWHOrttft r\\




V 90 0> i»|rM
\^V
"*yy-«*




L SOO >»!'«-
V. 	 	
	 trmpni,! ,o
uotlanfinij
9 (




900>»I«M
\l 	 ~1
^Al i»npou ,0
,tN»l3npo^
0 1




900 W*. j
\l 	 ~ 	 1
Jllnpoy p>
i*mi3n|Mif^
t 59



to »i»w

'IJnpoij |o
r<9l


- so O>«OT ,„„„„„,„„

— . —


S00> »l»M-

9OOtX«
| m»M iro.iDnporj



*i*»is sn
Si
r^HICZII

[ •»•« uwianpw,!



A-tu-
J8O
0<
^— L__
900



"i*** sn
W/H uotiw^o.j


'^•"S sn
9(91
nxz~

VNOI1

~1















	 1
n






n
\l
\\
M
/
/
/
./


                                   VII »-'»-"ni*|j[|
                    ssn cmv Nouanaoiw ONIHOO SIIVIVHIIM w tjswi   r r.
80»l»
     M  I  ""** "°":>y"'-'l

-------
 3.4.2  Transportation

      Phthalata esters are widely distributed via the transportation
 network to the large number of converting plants in various parts of
 the country, for incorporation into calendered, extruded, and coated
 flexible PVC.   The phthalate esters are believed to be transported in
 liquid form, primarily via unpressurized rail tank car (DOT Specifica-
 tion 103)  and/or motor carrier tank truck (Specification MC 310, 311,
 312, or 331) and, to a lesser extent, in small quantities (i.e.! 55-'
 gallon drums).   The phthalate esters are not listed as hazardous
 materials,  which fall within the regulatory framework of the Department
 of Transportation,  Materials Transportation Bureau.,  However,  transporta-
 tion of these  materials may fall within the regulatory jurisdiction of
 other government agencies because of the possibility of releases to the
 environment as  a result of operator or mechanical failure.

      The amount of  loss associated with transportation (other  than from
 accidents)  is  not known but can  be assumed  to  be a function of the size
 of the shipping container and the remaining amount after  the container
 is  empty." Most esters are shipped by rail tank cars  or tank trucks to
 distribution points  and sites of major users.   Some of  the  smaller opera-
 tors  among  the  8000  compounders of plastics probably  receive  the  plasti-
 cizers  in 55-gallon  drums.   Small operators  using rotational molding,
 coating processes, and  small injection molding  processes  could possibly
 obtain  a major  portion  of their  plasticizer  in  this manner.  Products
 made  with these  processes  account for approximately 75,000 kkg of
 phthalate esters  and include  the  following products:

          70% of  footwear•
          30% of  outerwear
          100% of weatherstripping
          20% of  furniture
          100% of toys
          100% of sporting goods
          100% of garden hoses
          100% of medical tubing

 If it is assumed  that 80% of  this production is accounted for by 20% of
 the companies who are large enough to purchase in tank car lots", then
 the remaining 20%, or 15,000 kkg, might be delivered from the manufac-
 turer to the compounder in 55-gallon drums.   If between one cup and one
 quart of plasticizer remains in each empty drum, then between 0.11% and
 0.46% or between 18 kkg and 68 kkg could be wasted and released to the
 environment when the drum is reconditioned,  destroyed,  or stored in a
manner that allows the remaining third to be released.   The total amount
 transported in drums, according to this calculation, would be approxi-
mately 3% of the total production.

     While  it is unknown what percentage of  Che phthalate transported
 in tank cars or tank trucks ramains after the material  has bean" delivered
and the tank is "empty," an estimate of approximately one-tenth of one

-------
 percent remaining may be reasonable (Arthur D. Little, Inc., estimate).
 This amount will either be cleaned from the tank prior to loading another
 commodity or will remain in the tank if the vehicle is in dedicated
 service.   Information on numbers of tank cars that are dedicated is
 unavailable.  For estimating purposes, it has been assumed that
 0.1% of the material transported is cleaned and flushed with water.
 The amount being transported in tank cars and tank trucks would be
 approximately 97% of the total production.  A weighted average of the
 waste from the 3% delivered in 55-gallon drums and the 97% delivered in
 tank cars is still approximately 0.1%.  For calculating a materials
 balance,  it is assumed that one-tenth of a percent is lost because of
 transportation-related causes.

 3.4.3  Formulation and Product Fabrication

      One  significant transport path for PVC plasticizer-type esters  is
 volatilization during their compounding with PVC.   During compounding,
 stabilizers,  lubricants,  pigments,  etc.  are combined  with PVC and 40 to
 70  parts  of plasticizer (per 100 parts of PVC).   Subsequent  processing,
 which may include calendering  (the  placement of  materials on hot rolling
 mills to  fuse the elements)  or other processes that raise the tempera-
 ture of the mixture to form a  plastic  product,  can result in the vapori-
 zation of an unknown amount of  plasticizer.   Hirzy ^t al.  (1978)
 estimate   that approximately 2-4% of the plasticizer  is  volatilized
 in  this way.   This  percentage  corresponds  to a loss of 5200-10,300 kkg
 per year.

      It is  assumed  that  in  some of  the larger  processing  facilities,  the
 vapors  of plasticizer pass  through  a water spray  for  cooling and  con-
 densing the vaporized plasticizer.   Some of  the waste stream may  be
 recovered through, reprocessers,  and  some may be  released  directly to
 water (Hirzy _e_t _al.  1978).   In  smaller operations,  much  of the  plasti-
 cizer vapor is probably vented  directly  to the atmosphere.   In  construct-
 ing  a materials balance, it was  assumed  that 65% of the vapors  liberated
 during  the  compounding process  is released into  the water and 35% is
 released  into  the air.  For  calculation  purposes, we  assume  that  3% of
 the  total phthalate  plasticizers are volatilized in this manner.

      Once the  PVC and  the plasticizer  have been compounded and  fabricated
 into  various products, other wastes are  generated.  These wastes  can
 range from  1 to 12% of the material processed, depending on  the product
 and  the processing  (Arthur D. Little,  Inc.,  estimate).  It has been
 estimated that on the average approximately  2% of  this manufacturing
waste is  incinerated, while 98%  is deposited to a landfill.  Most of
 this manufacturing waste is disposed of  in private landfills, or  removed
 by private haulers contracted by the manufacturer.  No data are available
 regarding the division between private  (industrial) facilities and muni-
 cipal landfills; but an estimate of 75%  to industrial  landfills,  and  25J,
 to municipal landfills is not unreasonable  (Arthur D.  Little. Inc.,
estimates).

-------
      The wire and cable product category is  one area in which a higher
 percentage of waste is  incinerated.   In some states, wire and cable
 waste continues  to be incinerated in order to recover copper wire.
 Assuming that 10% of the wire  and cable wastes can be incinerated,
 159  kkg  of DEHP  used in wire and cable  manufacture were incinerated
 in 1977.

 3.4.4 Products  in Use

      Estimating  release rates  of phthalates  from products in use is
 complicated and  speculative at best.  Insufficient data are  available
 on release rates  under  ambient conditions  typical of product use.   This
 is true  partially because of the wide variety of plastic products  and
 their use,  and partly because  the manufacturers  are more interested in
 relative  performance of plasticizers than  absolute emission  rates.
 Therefore,  most  studies have been comparative in nature and  have been
 conducted under  temperature, pressure,  and solvent conditions  designed
 to accelerate the release rates.

      Studies  under  normal use  have been  limited  and indicative rather
 than  definitive.   In addition, the broad spectrum of manufactured  products
 containing  phthalates makes it difficult to quantify accurately phthalate
 release rates into  air  and water.

      Peakall  (1975)  has  given  the best  summary to date  of  phthalate use
 and distribution  in  the  environment.  However, some  of  his'assumptions
 require modification in  light  of more recent  data,  and  other acknowledged
 arbitrary  assumptions are debatable.  The  conservative  approach taken here,
 is to maximize release  rates within reason.   This  seems  -justified  because
 the major  portion of phthalates  that are not  released from products
 during their  useful  lifetimes are disposed of in  landfills where they
 apparently  remain bound indefinitely in the plastic matrix (Storm 1977).

     Peakall  (1975) has established a rough arrangement of plastic
 products by groups in accordance with their environmental exposure  during
 use;  this approach is useful in  estimating release rates.

     Estimates of releases to water from products  that  are in  direct
 contact with  liquids  (such as swimming pool liners, garden hoses, and
medical uses)  are taken from Peakall (1975).   The estimated maximum rate
of phthalates  released from thes'e products is 1.0% per year.

     The rate of release to air from film-type products with direct
contact to  the air  (such as flooring, weather stripping, furniture, wall
 covering, auto mats and tops,  auto upholstery and seat covers,  apparel,
 and food wrapping) is estimated as 0.2%  for this study.  This  is within
 the range suggested by Peakall (1975) but higher  than'his assumed 0.1%,
which he states will occur mostly within che first raw weeks,   wliile  it
 is clear that  the rate at which plasticizers  are volatilized (or leached)
 is higher for new products,  a long-term  or continuing loss.may  also
occur.  In addition, high taaiperature tests indicate that much nore
                                 3-16

-------
 rapid loss rates are possible, e.g., 2.8% loss per hour for DEHP in a
 milling test at 170°C (Gross and Colony 1973).  Therefore, in line with
 a conservative approach,  the annual loss rate is assumed to be 0.2%.

      For products having  low surface contact such as wire and cable,
 houseware,  sporting goods and toys, and other PVC uses, Peakall (1975)
 assigns a loss rate of 0.01%.  This appears rather low considering that
 some products in this category are subject to washing, exposure to high
 temperatures, sunlight, and physical stress.  Therefore, for this
 analysis,  the conservative rate of 0.4% is used,  half of which is released
 to the air and half to the water compartment.

      Non-plasticizer uses of phthalate  esters are found in applications
 such as carriers and dispersing media for pesticides, cosmetics,  color-
 ants,  and catalysts.  Some of this material is sprayed directly into
 the air or applied directly onto the skin for a relatively rapid  transfer
 to the water during washing.   A maximum one-year  lifetime is  assumed for
 this  group  and that 40% of the phthalate content  is  vented directly to
 the air while another 40% is  directly releas'ed into  the water during
 the product use.   The remaining 20% is  assumed to be adsorbed to  sur-
 faces  or absorbed into plant  or animal  cells-.

      Each  of these assumptions is  highly uncertain,  and detailed  investi-
 gation could show that some of the assumed loss  rates are actually  lower
 and some are actually higher.   For example,  the  loss rate from flooring
 is  assumed  to be directly released .to air at a rate  of 0.2% per year.
 However,  flooring is subject  to washing with detergents in which  the
 DEHP  or other plasticizers  are probably more soluble than water.  Thus,
 phthalates  used  in flooring may be directly  released into  water.  Vari-
 ables, such  as solubility  of the plasticizer  in the particular detergent,
 the  transfer from the floor into the  detergent,  the  frequency of washing,
 and  the  amount of wear of  the  floor,  have  not  been evaluated.

 3.4.5   Disposal

     Approximately  145,000  kkg  of  municipal  solid  waste were  generated
 in  1977  (Third Annual  Report  to Congress  1975; Arthur  D. Little, Inc.,
 estimate).   The number of municipal incinerators  currently  operating
 in  the United States  is estimated  to  be  50, with  an  average capacity of
 250 tons per  day  (Arthur D. Little, Inc.,  estimate).   Thus, approximately
 3% of municipal waste  is incinerated.   Since the wide  variety  of plastic
 products is  assumed  to follow  the  municipal waste  stream,  3%  of phthalates
 in products  are incinerated as well.

     This contrasts with the 15% loss of phthalate products in incinera-
 tion assumed by Peakall (1975) on  the basis of a study  of ?C3's by
Nisbet and Sarofim  (1972).  Part of the discrepancy may be attributed
 to special measures used to destroy PC3'3 by high  temperature  incinera-
 tion, and part is probably because of the  reduction of  open burning as
a rasult of the Clean Air  Act.  In any event,  97%'of ohthalates in"
used products is assumed to be deposited in landfills  and 3%  is destroyed

-------
by incineration.  No allowance has been made  for  the uncollected  waste
that is randomly distributed as litter along  roads and  streets  because no
information is available on that percentage.  However,  it is  expected  that
litter would reduce the amounts deposited to  landfills  and  incinerated.

3.5  SUMMARY

    -Losses of phthalate esters (DEHP, BBP, DBF,  DEP, and DMP)  during
production and use are illustrated on Figure  3-3.  No information was
available on DNOP.  Various assumptions have  been used  in this  analysis
and the major ones are summarized in Table 3-4.  A more detailed  descrip-
tion of losses for various use categories is  given in Appendix  A.
Vaporization during compounding accounts for  a major portion  of the
release of esters into the atmosphere and water for that portion  of
esters used for plasticizers.  DBP, DEP, and  DMP also have major  routes
into the air and water through non-plasticizer products.  For DMP, the
non-plasticizer routes to air and water are the major routes.   Table 3-5
shows a summary of annual losses for each step from production  through
disposal and also shows the percent of the original production  that is
deposited in landfills.  Apparently,  between  71 and 92% of each of the
esters ultimately is deposited in a landfill.   Table 3-6 shows the
annual releases of phthalate esters into the various environmental
compartments.   For these five esters, an average of 2.7% is released
into the air,  3.3% is released into water, 91.1% is deposited into land-
fills, and 2.9% is destroyed by incineration.
                                  3-18

-------
            TABLE  3-4.  PRIMARY ASSUMPTIONS USED IN MATERIALS
                        BALANCE ANALYSIS FOR PHTHALATE ESTERS
         Process
Production
Transportation
Compounding—vaporized
Solid waste-manufacture
Use
  Non-plas ticizer
  PVC
    Direct contact with liquids
    Film in contact with air
    Low surface contact
Disposal
 Loss  Rate
(% loss/year)
    0.5
    0.1
    3.0
  1-7.3

   80

    1
    0.2
    0.4
  100  (of
      remaining)
Compartment
water
water
35% air, 65% water
97% landfill,3%
incineration
50% air, 50% water

water
air
50% air, 50% water
97% landfill
3% incineration
Source:   See text.
                                 •;-•' Q

-------
        TABLE 3-5.  ANNUAL PHTHALATE LOSSES TO THE ENVIRONMENT
                    IN THE UNITED STATES
                             Loss  (thousand kkg/year)-
                       DEHP     BBP     DBF     PEP     DMP

Production              0.9     0.3     0.04    0.04    0.02

Transportation          0.2     0.1     0.01    0.01    0.01

Compounding (Total)     5.0     1.7     0.2     0.2     0.1

     (to air)            1.8     0.6-    0.1     0.1     a.03

     (to water)         3.3     1.1     0.1     0.1     0.1

Manufacturing           9.9     1.2     0.3     0.3     0.1

Product Use            >3.4    >0.8    >0.3    >0.3   >10.1

Product Disposal      149.1    51.7     6.1     6.7     2.9
(97% to landfill)



Source:  See text.
                                 3-20

-------
                       TABLK 3-6.   ANNUAL PIITIIALATE RELEASES TO ENVIRONMENTAL
                                   COMPARTMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES
 Keleased  to  air


 Released  to  water


 I and I ilied


 I IK: i nerated


TOTAI/
1
DEIIP
4.3
5.2
154.1
4.9
]68.5
BBP
1.4
1.4
51.3
1.6
55.7
DBP
0.3
0.3
6.3
0.2
7.1
DEP
0.2
0.3
6.8
0.2
7.6
DMP
0.5
0.6
2.9
0.1
4.1
Total
6.8
7.9
221.3
6.9
242.9
Percentage
1.2
1.5
41.4
1.3
45.4
1
 Includes process  loss during production, estimated  at  0.5%  of  production
 released to water.


 I in: I tides U.S. supply plus process loss during production.
Source:  See Appendix A.

-------

-------
                    4.0  FATE AND DISTRIBUTION OF PHTHALATE
                         ESTERS IN THE ENVIRONMENT
        MONITORING DATA
   armyworn,

                                                   PUnt3'  "Broach  and
  rrh*,.,         ,
  when  compared  with

  4-1'1  Levels  in Water and
         et al.
                                                  ~
                                                      areas.  However,
 in               to.          bvs                                 n
 falls in Waukegan Harbor  sfn FrancL^^      manuf Curing Plant out
 Mississippi, Mx'ssouri  Ind Srri'ack Rivers'  ^ ^ 'f51^'  Ulin°is'
 surveys are shown in Table 4-2   Si? If    f16  rSSUltS  of  thess
 than those reported in Table 4-1                    "'  sli§hc1^
 of levels of phthalate
unidentified  substance  Was  entire^
cory contamination was  reported   thus
high.  The levels reported  by liam  e?'
River Delta were xuch lower (0 07 u^
                                       a    i  -
                                                  -
                                                  "
                                                            chat the
                                                       at limiti^ labora
                                                       ^ unreal"ticallv
saai
       ,0.3
                   "
                   ;n
action.
                       ESI1. and 1

-------
                            TABLE 4-1.  PHTHALATE ESTERS  IN WATER  AND
                                             T'EHP
DBF
                                                                            DEP
                                                                                         DMP
                                       Source
 Mississippi River Delta
 Black Bay, Lake Superior
 •rural and industrial area)
 Hananand Bay, Lake Huron,
 Michigan  (forested area)  -

 Lake Huron, Michigan

 Missouri River, McBaina,
 Missouri (turbid)

 Charles River, Boston

 Merrimack River

 Unknown river downstream from
 industrial inputs)
 Nipigon Bay, Lake Superior
 deceiving water of pulp and
 paper mill)
 Tama River, Tokyo
 (industrial location)

 Mississippi Delta
 Gulf Coast
 Open Gulf
Morth Atlantic
max. of
600
300

-
5.0
4.9
0.38 - 1.9
Detected
1-50
sediment
0.2-56 mg/kg
-
.3-7*
Mean .074
Range .023-
.225
Mean . 1305
Range . 006-
.316
Mean .0805
Range . 006-
.097
Mean t QQ49
«0 ,3
ta>

0.04
.09

2 2
Detected Detected
1-20
sediment
1.5-25 mg/kg
0.1-23
sediment,
1 sample -
70 mg/kg -dr>
weight
.0007-
.0035
Mean .09^
Range .0065-
'.471
Mean .Q743
Range .0034
.265
Mean .0935
Range .003-
U33
Not Detected
Corcoran
(1973)

Mayer et al.
(1972)
Mayer ec al.
(1972)
Mayer ec al.
(1972)
Maver et al.
(1972)
Kites (1973)
Detected2 HiCes <«")
Jungclaus
et.al. (1978
Brovnlee and
Strachan
(1977) •
Morita et al.
(1974)
- * Giam et al.
(1978)
Giam et al.
(1978)
Giam et al.
(1978)
Giam et al.
(1978)
    ar concentrations in ug/l; sediment in mg/kg.

"Blanks judged acceptable for contamination.

JThe authors reported cnat care «as taken co avoid contamination, but a blank was not  reportea.

"Possible overestimation of 10%.

'Typical blank  <.001 ag/1 for D8P and  < 0.0002 ug/l for OEHP.

-------
M ! »T

-------
FIGURE 4-2.  DISTRIBUTION OF  AMBIENT LEVELS OF  DI-N-BUTYL
             PHTHALATE  IN  SURFACE WATER
                                                                             of obi|erv«tions

-------
      JC

      p:
>  sc


>  c
•z.   -Z.

v.   c

   •n
   z
    i

-------
                    FIGURE 4-4.   DISTRIBUTION OF AMBIENT LEVELS OF  DIMETHYL  PHTHALATE IN  SURFACE  WATER
   100
I   I
    Concuiu ration (ug/1)
n
    10




    I- IWI




• ;J 1001 1000




   IUOO IUOOU
                                              100
*Ni>iUi^i of ol,:n: i vai I mib In river buutn.
£ •
r
W«I«H OuU
-a
\ J*^
0
r-

Couth C*nml
Loom Mm M.
                                                                                                                   'Source:  STOKE I'

-------
'WUKE  4-5.   DISTRIBUTION OF AMUJENT  LEVELS OF 1)1 ETHYL PHTHALATE IN SURFACE WATER
                                                         too
                                                                                  Source:  STORE?

-------
            TABLE 4-2.  MEAN PHTHALATE ESTER ENVIRONMENTAL
                        LEVELS IN WATER AND SEDIMENT1
                    Water (ug/1)	            Sediment  frog/kg 1
DEHP
DMP
DEP
DBP
BBP
2
Mean Cone.
.085
N.D.
3.2
0.29
0.75
Freq.3
36
0
82
58
64
Mean Cone. FrecL.
0.89 46
N.D. 0
N.D. 0
N.D. 0'
0.43 25
N.D. - Not Detected


 Fifty water and 28 sediment samples (not in the immediate
 vicinity of sewage and waste outfalls) were analyzed.
2
 Average concentration of only those samples containing the
 particular phthalate ester.

 Percent of samples containing the particular phthalate ester.
Source:  Hirzy at al. (1978).
                                 4-8

-------
   4-1.2  Levels in Soil
                                          ; «.




   soil,  corrected for balkgrouJd  It J^J *""*  °'°'5 "*'** DEHP ^ <*«
   vas not identified! baCiCgr0und'  buc noc  ^r  recovery.  The specific source


   4.1.3  Levels in Air
                                      tr
  A recent study by Giao et  *i   no™?         * plastlcs is "ell known

  and 0.3 ng/m37(*Ln  v^f^ sp c iveTl Jf" ^ °BP "
  Mexico.  Samples  taken over \l  I  S ? , '    the air over the
  tiona may be found.                n   s              «
  o£  these levels.               mping  ls  needed to confirm the prevalence




  4'l-4  Levels in Bioea
 and DBP in aquatic  organisms   lIvS    ShOW * C0nsiste*c  ^ l^el of D2HP

 industrial areas; howfver contamil^ Seem " ** Sli§htl7  higher

 rural areas.                        '
 consistent with  the levels found in nrh J   ?  manufacturing plant are

 facturing facilities do not se^ to create "0^^^ ^*>

 maximum  reported value for DEHP was 7 1 m«/v  J  ^   SP°tS'   The

 sharks from San Francisco Bav   ??f 7'1.nig/ks found in smooth hound

       the ..                    '           ta r^eTanl
                    of       -.
--ported  DEHP  laveis oj ^ofl
                                              .,
                                             j.rom  Arkansas rarms.  DBF

-------
                       TABLE 4-3.  RESIDUES OF PHTHALATE ESTERS IN AQUATIC ORGANISMS
        SPECIES
Molluscs, freshwater
arthropods, small fish
Phytoplankton,
zooplankton
Bream
(Abranis brama)
   muscle
   liver
   roe

?erch
gerea fluriafllis)
   muscle

Pike (Esox facias)
   auscle
   liver
   kidney

Roach (Rutilis rutilis)
   muscle
   roe
Pickerel
 7  samples*




 7  samples*

 7  samples*

 7  samples*

 *  samples*

 *  samples*
    LOCATION
Finland, vicinity of
  OEHF plane:

  - ac mouth of brook
    leading from dump
    to brook
    brackish bay
    2 km from factory,
    1 km from dump,
    3 km from waste-
    vater discharge
        DEHP
      (mg/kg)
        0.1
             COMMENT
   SOURCE
Lake Ontario &
Lake Huron, Canada
                           0.5
                           0
                           0.2
                         0-0.1
                           0
                           2.3
                           0
        1.1
        0

        DEHP
      (mg/kg)

   4 samples
   3 showed
   trace levels
  corrected for background
  (0.2 tag/kg)  but not recovery,
  (40%),  results probably in
  dry weight

  corrected for background
  (0.2 mg/kg)  but not recovery,
  (40%),  results probably in
  dry weight
                                                                   DNBP
                                                                 (mg/ks
Persson e_t al.
       (1973)
                                                  Persson et al.
                                                         (1978)
                                                                     Persson et al.
                                                                            (1978)
                                                                     Persson at'al.
                                                                            (1978)
                                                  Persson et al.
                                                         (1978)
                                                                     Persson ec al.
                                                                            (1978)
Mobile Bay




Chesapeake Bay

Lake Erie

Lake Michigan

Calveston Say

Lower Mississippi
1 sample 0.22
Others MD
       ND

   Traee-0.2

   0.08-0.22

   ^0-trace

   ND-0.12
4 samples,    Blanks .015 mg/kg   Williams  (1973)
3 showed      for DEHP, and .01
trace levels  for OBP. Levels less
              than twice blank
              designated as trace.

              Levels of less than    FDA  (1974a)
              0.2 tng/kg are suspect
              due, to high levels
              of DEHP in blanks

     —                              FDA  (1974a)

                                     FDA  (1974a)

  MD-2.28                            FDA  (1974a)

                                     FDA  (1974a)

  Trace-2.12                         FDA  i,1974a)
                                                       4-10

-------
                         TABLE 4-3.  RESIDUES OF PHTHALATE ESTERS O AQUATIC ORGANISMS  (Continued)
          SPECIES



   Macicaral and flounder

   r  samples*

     samoles*
       LOCATION



   Long Island Sound

   San  Francisco Say

   ?uget  Sound
   DEHP
 (mg/kg)
 0.48-2.16

 0.11-7.1
  QNBP
(mg/kg)
      COjjMENT
                            SOURCE



                         ?DA (1974a)

                         FDA (1974a)

                         FDA (1974a)
                                                      DEHP
   Seston
                                                                     DNBP
  Channel
  Cacfish
                              Nipigon  Bay.  Lake
                              Superior,  up  co
                              6.3  km from krafc
                              pulp and paper  mill)
 Channel
 Cacfish

 Dragonfly
 Naiads

 Tadpoles

 Walleve
 Bellow  Perch


 Brook Crout


Eel



-acfiah


3 - Mot  ietactaa

 Comoosna or fish =?ecias.
  Mississippi and
  Arkansas  (agricul-
  tural and  industrial
  areas)
 Fairport National
 Fish Hatchery. Iowa
 (water supply from
 industrial area of
 Mississippi River)
                            Black Bay, Lake
                            Superior.  Ontario
                            (rural and industrial
                            areas)
Lake St. Pierre,
Canada
  3.2
 0.4

 0.4


 0.3

 0.8
 Spirit Lake,  Iowa        NO
 (agricultural area)

 Clover Leak Lake, CA     ND
 (10,300 ft elevation)
0.104
                        Trace
                                                             Trace
                                                                     Trace
   0.2
                                          0.5
                  MD
                 .VD
 2/20 samples showed   Brownlee and
 trace levels, care    Strachen (1977)
 taken to avoid con-
 tamination but no
 blank reported.
 Approximate  detection
 limit .01  mg/kg  dry weight.

 Detection  limits,  0.1 Mayer  et  al
 and 0.5  mg/kg  for        '  (19797"°
DNBP  and DEHP, res-
pectively, contami-
nation reduced, but
unreported.

                      Mayer st_ al.
                          (1972)
                     Mayer e_t al.
                          (1972)

                     Mayer ^et al.
                          (1972)
                     Mayer e£ al.
                          (1972)
                                 Mayer e_t al.
                                     (1972)

                                 Mayer _a£ aj..
                                     (1972)
                         for DNBP.

                         Levels less cnan
                         :wica blank
                         Jesignacad as  :raca

-------
was  found  in  one  sample  at  trace  levels.   No  DEHP was detected in fish
from Georgia  farms.   The detection of  phthalates  in hatchery-reared fish
is not  surprising, however,  considering Mayer's _et al.  (1972)  report
of 2-7  mg/kg  DEHP  in  commercial fish food.

      Little information  is  available on phthalate esters  in terrestrial
organisms.  Perrson _et _al.  (1978)  reported  2.8 mg/kg in soil arthropods
sampled in the vicinity  of  a DEHP  manufacturing plant.  Egg yolks of
double-crested comorant  and  herring gulls  contained 0.014-0.019 mg/kg
DBP  (Zicko 1973).

      The results described above suggest that DEHP and  DBP  are commonly
found in aquatic organisms, although generally at  low levels (less than
1 mg/kg).  Insufficient  information is available  on levels  in  terrestrial
organisms; therefore,  generalizations can not be assumed.

4.2   FATE OF  PHTHALATE ESTERS IN THE ENVIRONMENT

4.2.1  Methodology

      Materials balance data' (Chapter 3.0) and monitoring  data  (U. S. EPA1979a,
Morica  et .al.  1974, U.S. EPA 1974, Giam _ec al. 1978)  suggest pervasive
release and occurrence of phthalate esters throughout the environment.
Since phthalate esters are largely contained in PVC  products,  the wide
distribution  of these products suggests several million pounds  per  year
of the  material are released to both the atmosphere  and surface waters
over  a  broad  area of  the United States.  In addition, several hundred
million pounds of phthalate esters are disposed of  in landfills  yearly.

      This examination of the fate of six phthalate  esters is based  on
DEHP  as a prototype because of its large releases  into the  environment
and its greater persistence in water.  In addition, monitoring  data
show  that DEHP is the most prevalent  phthalate.   The assessment  of
transport and transformation in the environment is based  on work  conducted
by the  U.S. EPA (Wolfe .at .al. 1979).  The physical and chemical  data used
in fate analyses were provided primarily by a literature  search  (Versar
1979a,b).  The data bases provided in this literature search and  in the
model calculations (Wolfe .et al.  1979)  are re-evaluated to determine if
any trends other than those indicated by the calculations should be
anticipated.

      In the assessment of the fate of DEHP, a single compartment  model
is used as a  first step.   This represents a. "worst case"  situation in
which the discharge of the chemical is  confined to a single environmental
medium,  i.e.,  water.   No degradation processes or transfers to other
media are considered to determine the maximum level of concentration in
the compartment in question.  Available models were then  used to  examine
the effects of the degradation processes.

     While "he single compartment approach is utilized for the water
portion of the analysis,  degradation in the atmosphere can be estimated
                                  4-12

-------
   as a surrogate; and first order lecav n™ ?   U81n8 an  lnert
   obtain the concentration estates   T^        """ s^^imPosed
   are based on the two measured ll^s^lr^^'^3 °£ Chese
   available in the literature   ?ate oroIL C°nCentraCion ^" currently
   derived  largely from experimental ohI        ln 01°ta and 3oil ««
   result in estimates  oH"c«?r«io«   Jn"^-  -TheSe ^^ eff°r£s
   importance  of  various  fate  processes       addic"*>  they confirm the
  4.2.2
          Physical and Chemical PT^^^
                                           -o  -w  wilt gcuetaj.  CiaSS  of

  They exist'gen^Uy^riiquid'^itr110 ""  ^h°*h^' acid).
  moderately soluble to essentially insolubl^ S°lubxlit:Les  ranging from
  tively stable,  breaking down'slowlv to L™'^?1? con»pounds are  rela-
  acid.   Appendix B presfnts the physical-cheS^  ^S °* C° Phthalic
  Phthalate esters considered ^r^ysical-chenil^l properties of the six

  4-2.3   Fate  in
                                               d
 results are given in Aplx C   The «  ?    u descriPtions  <* these
 chemical loss mechanisms, including photolv,  Sh°W.,that  for ^HP,  the
 and biological degradation are insfgLLcant   In"     °J "" ^drol^sis'
 the export of DEHP is the primary ITsl TmecSni J  *n Stead^stace system,
 is more rapidly lost because of^ more ~o?J  iT,.00 the °ther hand' DMP
 biodegradation rate.   ln lakes and 00^,^  alkaline ^drolysia rate and
 Primary loss  mechanism,
 in a                    ccST   rn'oTl  (19?8) '
 state discharge followed by a Say Sear±f  as|umea  30-day  steady-
 parameters were used than L Wolf. L £  £9™
 Appendix C.   At the end of the 30-dff feViS  ?)f
 was found in the sediment, with       '"   '" °f
can
                                                                in

                                                '         concentrations
                                         P"sented above (Chapter 3.0)
                                                       Watar
                                                      °f the annual
             c
 indicates  that  5.3  x 103 kkj/jr D
 Using  Nisbet  and  Sarofim's  (1972)
 off  for  the United  States reaches
 -s  estimated at  a  steady-state of'o       g/
 a uotal  run-off of  2.4 x 10^5 i/vr  ,-nlf~  ms/
 (1977).  Thus, the  results of the°  °§
 1979) should be scaled do^n ov  a      r              -
 Hows in the environment.  The  ~alcui*rJ          rerlect  rhe  relative
 result in an apnroxiniation of 0^- ^/' f  C°ncenCracion ='or DEHP vili
EPA's concentration estimat  s res                ^ ?°1IUC3d areaa ' 3incs
                                                          ,
                                                   ^ calculation assumes
                                                 sua°««« of 7eMzian
                                 4-13

-------
 the U.S.  EPA  simulation  is  directly  proportional  to  water concentration
 because  of  the  linearity of all  the  processes,  concentration in sediment
 of approximately  10 mg/kg might  be expected.  This number should be used
 with  some caution, however.  According  to  the input  data in the U.S. EPA
 results,  the  octanol/water  partition coefficients were  input in place of
 the organic carbon partition coefficients  for the simulation' (see Table
 B-l).  For DEHP,  the organic carbon  partition coefficient is twice as
 large as  the  octanol/water  partition coefficient.  It is difficult to
 perform a similar scaling" procedure  for  the model used  by Neely (1978)
 because it  is confined to a single scenario of  a small  pond in transient
 state.

     The  formula  derived  by Southworth  (1979) was utilized to  confirm
 the low rate  of volatilization from  water  for DEHP used in the U.S.  EPA
 work.  A  discrepancy of  20  was found, suggesting that the volatilization
 rate predicted by 'the modeling exercise may be  overestimated.   The high
 value of  the  coefficient  does not affect the results, however,  because
 volatilization was negligible.

     A confirmation of the  low biodegradation of DEHP was-sought  in the
 literature.   Saeger and Tucker (1976) found that DEHP was  70-78%  degraded
 in 24 hours by activated  sludge organisms.  Mississippi River  organisms
 degraded  1 mg/1 DEHP by 60%  in 21 days.  Johnson and Lulves  (1975)  found
 that pond hydrosoil organisms degraded 41% of introduced  DEHP  in  30 days
 under aerobic conditions, while no degradation  took place  under anaerobic
 conditions.   In addition, Mayer  (1976) and Stalling _et  ail.  (1973)  reported
 degradation of DEHP by fathead minnows; 21-40% was degraded  in 56  days.

     Although these results  are from laboratory studies,  they  suggest
 that the biological half-life shown  in Table C-2 (1.5 x 106  days -  1.3  x
 10^ months) may be over estimated for DEHP, at least under aerobic  condi-
 tions.  Thus,  the concentration estimate should be considered  a maximum.

     The results presented above suggest that DEHP reaching  aquatic
 ecosystems will be largely accumulated in the sediment  and exported.
 Chemical loss  mechanisms as well as volatilization do not appear impor-
 tant.   However, biodegradation of DEHP may be an important loss mechanism.

     We conclude that concentrations of phthalates in water  in  the  ug/1
 range seem reasonable from the rough steady-state calculations  and  the
 relative roles of various fate processes illustrated in the model  simula-
 tion.   These concentration estimates are based on  materials balance and
 run-off estimates coupled with the fact that pathways other  than export
 are extremely long-lived by  comparison.  The estimate of 0.02 mg/1  in
water may be high because of the continuing transient state of  sorption
 of the material onto sediments.   River simulation indicates  that 176 days
 are required  to reach 99% steady state; lakes and rivers require over
 100 months.

     The monitoring data  for ambient water levels  of DEHP indeed exhibit
 concentrations in Che low ug/1 range (U.S.  EPA 1979a, U.S. EPA  1974, Morita
 a_t _al. 1975, Giam _§_£ _al.  1978).   Occasional readings  much higher than

                                  4-14

-------
                                                        or
   4.2.4  Fate in Air
                                    o
   hydroxyl  (OH)  radicals  in  th   atmosZr^T T^  ^  raacti^7  with
   in  the  photochemical  cyc?e of  S^«S      • /ydroxyl "dicals participate
   in  the  presence of sunliglt to fo™ *ll? **? "* °rSaniC Va?ors raa
   c7cle is  comonlv assorted with^hnf ^   P"ducts.  Although this
   ing degrees throughout the                miCEl 3m°S' ic occurs in ^a
                                                          the °H-
                                                                .essf-
 is 1.4 x 10-U Cm3 Mc-l (Doyle eralL^TT "f S °f °H W±th °-Xyle
 the California Air Resources Boa?d lc^ 2 '•  An/dvisory committee for
       £-
                               ^^
 Class  III  ranges  from  1  11*° i^ll""!^-!* \t0 * X 10'U ^ s
 states  that  appreciable  amounts of Class I ^L    ^ ^  (19?6) rePort
 after  a 10-hour irradiation oeriod ir,       =°«Pounds remain unreacted
 fraction of  Class III  compounds  perhap's'o^O^" *"' * Sufasta^ial
 irradiation  period.              Perhaps 40-60^, is consumed in a 10-hour
on -.iob             arS C° ChSSe ^"-  «. base,
             .
the phthalate esters basen ?he abovf'f6 "" C°nStanC  ranSes  ^«=h
constants of analog compounds and III Lf S!!Vations  of  act^l  rate
the acetate/prooioSate ?ate constants  Z"    ", eSCimates'   Considering
the reactivity  assignments  sho^  ?n  "able    I*7     ""  C0nstant'
      -                              a"' we  "t
                                  n  ae
    10-2 co 5 x 10fU cm3 ac£-ia'  we "timate a range of

ror the phthalate esters of'ince-ast   It ^L^*^™ ^^ With OH
pnthaiate is at the lower -nd of ^e'-an"   g   ™ exPec"d that  dime

and brancaed chain al.yl 3h'thaUte"s  c^C  ^ '" '^ ^ °haia
^e range of atmospheric half-i^ea  for  an  rS      UPPSr and  °f =he r
                              — ves  cor  an uraan  atniospners typified
                                                                    b

-------
           TABLE  4-4.  CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD REACTIVITY
                       CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS,  1976
     Class I
 (Low Reactivity)
 Cj_-C3 paraffins
 Acetylene
 Benzene
 Benzaldehyde
 Acetone
 Methanol
 Tert-alkyl alcohols
 Phenyl acetate
 Methyl benzoate
 Ethyl amines
 Dimethyl formamide
 Perhalogenated
 hydrocarbons
 Partially halogenated
 paraffins
 Phthalic anhydride**
 Phthalic acids**
Acetonitrile*
Acetic acid
Aromatic amines
 Hydroxyl amines
Naphthalene*
 Chlorobenzenes*
Nitrobenzenes*
Phenol*
        Class II
   (Moderate Reactivity)
Mono-tert-alkyl-benzenes
Cyclic Ketones
Alkyl acetates
2-Nitropropane
C.+  paraffins
Cycloparaffins
n-alkyl Ketones
N-methyl pyrrolidone
N,N-dimethyl acetamide
Alkyl phenols*
Methyl phthalates**
         Class III
     (High Reactivity)
All  other aromatic
hydrocarbons
All  olefinic  hydrocarbons
 (including partially
halogenated)
Aliphatic aldehydes
Branched  alkyl ketones
Cellosolve acetate
Unsaturated ketones
Primary & secondary C.4-
alcohols
Diacetone alcohol
Ethers
Cellosolves
Glycols*
C2+  alkyl  phthalates**
Other esters**
Alcohol amines**
C,+  organic acids +
di acid
C3+  di acid anhydrides**
Formin**
(Hexa methylene-tetramine)
Terpenic hydrocarbons
Olefin oxides**
* Reactivity data are either nonexistent or inconclusive,
  but conclusive data on similar compounds are available;
  therefore, rating is uncertain but reasonable.
-^Reactivity data are uncertain.
                                  4-16

-------
                 	a^ -to** ct i-Uia
    are  only about  1/10  that of
    hours  to 3.3  days.   Both of uae
    required to adsorb onto  aerosol particles  in
                                                 -"1ical concentrations
                                     atmosPheres will  therefore  be  13
                                                       **iov  the  ^
                                                               or rainout.
                                                          radical "action
                                                       *« ~Ce  —rolling
        To estimate concentrations In air  a slmni= t
   Appendix 0) .   asing che range of                     °°del "as usad
        previously,  a concentration
              afcer 2
  Ihe                 v        c.
  range of observed values in  a i?™^^  the  previous  section
  brackets the predicted range
  the previous P^^^
  than those in Ontario.   These observaMnn
  rapid decay of this material the atlcnhSUSSeSC
  is approximately three  times the             *
  ^scaling of the materials
                                                                -««l.t«,«.
                                                             .  The wide
                                               °f SampleS (0-0004-0.3 ug/m-3
                                                                describe^
                                                               much low^
                                                       co^innation of the
                                                       hlgh  Value 'in Ont""
 4-2-5  Fate in Biota
 are
                          t
                                                                   »«
                               ne     eesers     .   h
 included  a terrestrial  .-     tmuna-Lace esters.  The laboratory system
 The  rate  of up^kfanl  ?££ oTn^^l * •~'1«^ "ophic chain.
 that partitioning  occurs .tr£g£  ?'  the  ll^L"^1^ ^ °f DDT ^
 bxomagnification occurs in  the food chaL  Bi!    P   ntS ^ animals and
 occurred by a factor 53,890 in OedLo  •    / ^^concentration  of  DEEP
 107,670 in  Culex (mosqultc > 1*^^20*^ f'480/" Ihvsa  (snails) .
 results suggest that DEHP faioaccumulltes  in ,n  *f"Sla  (f ish) •  Th«e
be metabolized by fish.   The lioo                    ^ ^ PlantS
supported by high values of
acc^amulation in the fat
concentration.   Similar observtion
in the spleen,  liver,  lung ? Ind
                                                          rapid intake «d
                                                  a rinal 3teady-stata

                                                          DEH?

-------
     The model calculations by the group "at Dow Chemical Company  (Neely
1978) indicate a fish bioconcentration factor of 635.  This value is
high relative to the results for Gambusia quoted above; however,  other
laboratory studies reported the accumulation of DEEP by fathead minnows
to levels 160 to 1130 times the concentration in water (Harris and
Eschmeyer 1974).  Despite the size of the bioconcentration factor in  the
model calculations, only 0.3% of the total DEHP introduced into the
system accumulated in the fish tissue during a 30-day simulation  period.
The calculations indicate an infinite half-life for clearance after the
source of DEHP is removed.  This appears to be an artifact of the input
data for the calculation because metabolism within the fish compartment
is not considered.  In contrast to the model studies (Neely 1978), the
laboratory studies of Mayer (1976) suggest biotransformation and  elimina-
tion by fathead minnows with a half-life of 12.2 days after removal from
a continuous exposure to DEHP.  The data generally indicate that  both
transformation and degradation in biological materials are significant
in determining the fate of the phthalate esters as a group.  The  informa-
tion available suggests that these processes appear to be slower  for
DEHP than they are for the other compounds in the family.

4.2.6  Fate in Soil

     Limited information is available on the fate of phthalate esters in
soil, although the materials balance (Chapter 3.0) indicates that  the
primary entry point in the environment is the soil.  However, the migra-
tion of phthalate esters out of plastics into water or saline solutions
is considerably slower(Wildbrett 1973, Jaeger and Rubin 1973).  Thus,  the
amounts of phthalate esters that are available for transport or degrada-
tion would be low.  Migration could be increased by the presence of an
organic material or by increased temperature (Penn 1972).

     Previous sections have demonstrated that phthalates concentrate in
sediment; available phthalates would probably be adsorbed onto organic
matter in soil.   The formation of soluble complexes,  such as phthalates
with fulvic acid, may increase the mobility of phthalate esters (Ogner
and Schnitzer 1970).

     In addition, biodegradation of available phthalates  may occur.
Versar (1979a) has reviewed the literature regarding faiodegradation; it
is not included here.   The conclusions were that degradation in soil is
highly variable and rates cannot be established.   However,  the authors
felt that biodegradation would be an important fate process in soil.

4.3  SUMMARY

     The consideration of fate mechanisms indicates that  export of DEHP
is the primary fate mechanism in water.   The U.S.  EPA model (EXAMS)
predicts that neither chemical (oxidation,  hydrolysis,  and photolysis)
nor biological processes will determine the fata of DEHP.   It has also
been demonstrated that volatilization is unimportant.   Laboratory studies
suggest that biodegradation by fish and microorganisms  may be more

-------
                                       ,                   «• —ed
   li« these chemicals.  Adsorption  S'nnr           " De able C° metab°-
   a steady-state system, altho^EHP iTc^S^S'^" *
   mechanism for DMP in   vers  s        Tai ^ T*  The ^^ face
   however,  biodegradation dominates              °ther SquaCic ac°sys tarns,
   hydroxyl         atcdr?cion                                  bv
   not  expected  to  be  important?              Peculates and rainout is
                                                                      land-
       would be Subjec  to
                                                        -d observed
  trations in soil     expected to bTs^Tr^6^3 °f interes't-  Con«n-
  Phthalates from plastics in Lndf?n ^  ' bf°aUSe the ext"ction of -
  data were available for co^centrf tion in Lil" ?*?"'   N° ^"oring
  vas  excluded from Figure 4-6   T?e °ou,h LtL^  thuS/his Compartment
  a water  concentration  of 0.02 mg/1 IretncertS^ :•» conducted hera giving
  factor of  10.   Therefore  rh» J,^   J « ^f  in by  an  approximate
  the  calculated  concentrakon 1« T -    °-006-°-060 m8/l i«  shown as
  mately bracket  th?  "JnJ  Sd^Sn^h"8'- -  K^^ Values  aPPro^-
  because of the  proximity o ^sources  and  dlSf iU?Y  °f C0ncent"^°n
  The sediment calculations systematical sLw  f?   VelS °f  dilutio^
  tration compared with those  reporteJin  rh  T-    Wer range  °f concen-
 Here again, a factor of 10 uncertainty b  I h   K*'"" (U'S' E?A 1974^
 the calculated values.   The disparity her   haS been assi§^ to bracket
 concentrations may result from the eTJEiT"     Calculated and observed
 tions and from the relatively^e masi ^lb^™ a^umptions in the calcula-
 tnodel compartment for hydrosoil   For eithf "dlments as^§ned to the
 values, the quantity of DEHP partitlL!^       !  calculated or observed
 is  large  compared with  thafpartitlned i£       S*dlBenC  "-Payment
 the model  calculation demonstrated that 98  oTl^'   **  mentioned ab°->
 vas exported  at  equilibrium   ?his occurs on?^   f6 maCerial  introduced
 i.e.,  the  sediment compartment has reached its   r  I  SatUration is  attained;
 possible reason  for  the disparity  couldho  r\   3tea^^tata  load.   Another
 tative were the  samples taken  ror  sediment in"  IT^™ °* ^  «?«««'
Because of fallout and resuspens ion  it i f% ?•  ? measurem^ts program.
vertical concentration gradients of' Ch.  J   ??ly possible  that shar^
sediment layers.        S^aients of  the adsorbed material exist in
  a.on.  ar.:   (1)  :he  bui
 eacnaa  a  relatively hlgn  ,alue  c
                                  i-19

-------
                  Mostly  Degraded
                  by OH-reaction
                        t
AIR
Remote
Calc. 0-.008
Obs. .0004
[concentrations in
Urban
.02-. 09
.3
»Jg/m)
                         f
                  4.3 x  10  kkg/yr
1
o




SEDIMENT
Calc. 5-50
Obs. 20-200
(concentrations in mg/kg)




J. J A \V KB.g/ y I
1
WATER
Calc. t006-.06
Obs. .001-. 05
(concentrations in mg/l)
i— — — 	 	 	





FISH
Calc. 4-38(30-day exposure)
Obs. 0.3-3
(concentrations in mg/kg)
                  Mostly Exported
FIGURE 4-6.
SUMMARY OF FATE ANALYSES  FOR DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL  PHTHALATB  COMPARING
CALCULATED VALUES AND  ACTUAL OBSERVATIONS

-------
                             calcuiation
                        coupling occurs between the air ar,^
      . oecause,  in the case of DEHP *r iaa««.              d water compart-

      water and  very little rainsoufof th*' **** i^1* volaeili"s 'from
  largely exported to the oJan  and thf     J"'   T™ WSter fracc^n is

  quickly by reactions with the'hydroxvl SL  1"!° ** de§raded relatively

  compartment  is  shown as  a separate entity in v'ieull*S^ T"0"'  Che ?^
  concentrations  are  calculated nr  nK = ^  I I  *l8ure 4-o.   Extremely lot

  sources  of DEHP being emoted into thTair  ^"T ^^ fr°m iike1^
  levels are estimated  to  be n.n^-n  no  .../_i'   n.the other hand'  urban
                 eng emitted    n                                  ey

levels are esti^ted^to be 0 o'o 09 L/1?'   h°Vhe  °ther  ^  Urban
as 0.3 ug/m3 have been reJQ^^ 0.09 ug/m3, whlle  observations  as  high

measurement of concentration and ^h\dlspar1^ between  the  surface
concentration may arise r"ro™ I?    ! box-average calculation of  the

released from the" Si.^%^2, 2^^°^ ?'  "  ^  °EHP  i

                                               "
                            ™

 released from the       .%2, 2^^°^ ?'  " ^ °EHP is
 tration levels decline sharply Sth altitu^    " • llkely that the "ncen-
 Che difference in factors.           altitude.  This could easily explain
                                   DE          d  low
mere  rapidly  in  both  the water  and Sh    bl°de§raded «nd hydrolyzed
lower discharge  rate  compared with th"t 0"^^'-  BeCaUS6 °f their
would be expected to  be even smaller rL   ,?    '   heir con«ntrations
Rapid degradation in  air ho!ds  thf I       °S& Sh°Wn  in  Fi«ure  4-6.
compartment to *^t±^£^^™?^r*** *» th. atmospheric
mg further experimental and fi^H              sediments  are areas requir-
relatively high' P-rSSi.^?^^!'?10"-  ^^ °f their
cules may tend to accumulate 2 ! t£« i iedia.    ^ phthalate est" ~le-

-------

-------
                      5.0  HUMAN EFFECTS AND EXPOSURE




   5.1  HUMAN TOXICTTY
                                                           .
                     ^


  in tissues of individuals with no orevin         however, detected DEHP
  biomedical devices or catheters   ?H!      exP^ure to DEHP-treated-
  the source of DEHP cognation  ^ ttl^^ anvir°™e»"l exposure as
  -y present a health hazard to humans iLre'Se"™   d** ^^  "tn*
  the assessment of  the toxicitv ofThL         ^         an lnterest in
  report will review the toxicitv L ^ f!lpOUnds-   This Action  of the
  esters considered  in this aSSeL-nt    b°llSm °f Ch6 SiX Phthalate
                                      tt.     as  dioctyl phchal-
 abbreviations for the »tltlilaHtl?t  \   terminology.   The correct
 older nomenclature (DO^wL retailed wh     "^ utilized« but the
 what material was used!      recained whenever uncertainty exists as to
                                                       3f the six
            iies~ —  <---—^u uexow.  Additional information on


 5.1.1  DEHP

found,  and less than 3%  of the urJ™   ev^dence or conjugation vas
free phthalic acid.              "^ MCabolicea were in the fora of


     Recent evidence suggests that-  nF'4P -,• =.   -, •

-^                                     ~
       sex ac 0.0, 0.3 or o«  o( -
           rf^se:r ^- ^-
        in ate..- :a ..c.
                                      ™        -- -

-------
 gain was  seen  but  survival was  adequate,  with better than 50% of the
 animals in  each  group  surviving until  termination.   Neoplastic liver
 nodules were significantly elevated  in all treatment groups compared with
 controls  (see  Table  5-1)  and  the combined incidences of neoplastic
 nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly elevated in high
 dose male rats and in  both high and  low dose  females.   The incidence of
 hepatocellular cancinoma  alone  was statistically  significant only for
 high dose female rats  (NTP 1980).

     A dose-related  decrement in mean  body weight gain  was also noted in
 36C3F1 mice, particularly in  females from week 25 to the end of the
 study.  Increased incidences  of hepatocellular carcinoma were observed
 in high dose male mice and in both low and high dose females (see
 Table 5-2).  The combined incidences of hepatocellular  carcinoma and
 hepatocellular adenoma were also elevated in  these groups (NTP 1980).

     Negative carcinogenic effects, however, were reported in two other
 long-term studies.   Carpenter _et _al. (1953) reported no  adverse effects
 in two generations of Sherman strain rats  maintained on  diets containing
 up to 0*4% DEEP for  periods of  1-2 years.   In  another study,  dose-related
 enlargement of the liver  was observed  at  3 and 6  months  in rats admini-
 stered 0.1% or higher of  DEHP in the diet  with kidney enlargement noted
 in females given 0.5% DEHP  in the diet.   Because  of  the  high mortality
 (apparently unrelated to  the concentration of  DEHP in the diet),  only  a
 small number of animals was available  for  examination at 24  months  when
 the study was terminated.  No changes  that were strictly attributable  to
 DEHP were reported.  However, two of three  surviving high dose  males
 (0.5% level) exhibited testicular atrophy  and  necrosis of.the testes  -
 (Harris et al.  1956).

     Testicular changes and liver enlargement were also  reported  in sub-
 chronic studies.   Gray et_ al. (1977) noted liver  enlargement  and  testi-
 cular changes in rats administered 1% DEHP in  the diet for 17 weeks.
 Significant liver enlargement was also observed in rats  administered 2%
DEHP in the diet for 21 days (Bell et al.   1978, Moody and Reddy  1978).
Similar pathology has been reported in mice (Ota  et al.  1974, Yamada
 1974)  and guinea pigs (Carpenter _et_ al. 1953).  Dogs fed  30 mg/kg/day
 (5 days/week)  for 4 weeks, and then 60 mg/kg/day  (5 days/week)  for  an
additional 48 weeks did not manifest any anomalous clinical or  pathologi-
 cal signs  (Carpenter _et al. 1953).  In another study, however,  chronic
cholecystitis and some hemosiderosis of the spleen were noted in  two
dogs given 5000 mg DEHP/kg/day by gavage for 14 weeks.  No indications
of toxicity were noted in  two other dogs similarly treated with  100  mg/
kg/day (Harris  et al. 1956).

     With respect to reproductive changes, the addition of 200 mg DEHP/
kg/day to  the diet of rats for two years produced no adverse  effects on
 che reproductive  functions  (Carpenter _et al. 1953).   Bilateral  cubular
degeneration and atrophy of the  testes  vere seen,  however, in 90%  (43/43)
of Fischer 344  rats administered 1.2% DEHP in the diet for two years
 O6QO  aig/kg/day for a 300 g rat) compared  with 5%  (2/44)  and 2% (1/50) for

-------
            5-L
                              THE  DIET  FOR  TWO YEARS
          Hepatocellular
                                                 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Males
Control
0.6%
1. 27 '
Females
Control
0.6%

1.2%
______ 	 _ -NtsuDj.astic Nodules
1/50 (2%) 2/50 (4%)
1/49 (2%) . 5/49 uo-j
5/49 10%) 7/49 (14Z)

0/50 (0%) 0/50 (Q%)
O//.Q//cw\
_/tt7 \^&) 4/&Q f'^?'^

8/50 <"I£?n n=n noo ?ie* ,,~~,
olus Neoola^rir MoH 1
3/50 (6%)
6/49 (12%)
12/49 (24%) p-0.01

0/50 (07)

6/49 (12%) p=0.012

Source:   NTP (1980).

-------
      TABLE 5-2.  INCIDENCE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA AND ADENOMA
                  IN B6C3F1 MICE FED DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE IN
                  THE DIET FOR TWO YEARS
Males

Control

0.3%

0.6%


Females

Control

0.37,

0.6%
                    Hepatocellular
                       Carcinoma
 9/50  (18%)

14/48  (29%

19/50  (38%) p-0.022




 0/50  (0%)

 7/50  (14%) p»0.006

17/50  (34%) p <0.001
                       Hepatocellular Carcinoma  Plus
                          Hepatocallular Adenoma
15/50  (30%)

25/48  (52%) p-0.013

29/50  (58%) p-0.002




 1/50  (2%)

12/50  (24%) p»0.001

18/50  (36%) p <0.001
Source:  NTP (1980).
                                 5-4

-------
   £#-£'£ s r^riS-
   of.Che tastes were° also noted in r°s  £ ?±r "J^7 ^ d«»««at:ion
   greets vere  observed at the 40? mg/?g/day9?eve?  r^ ^ *" 9° dayS; n°
   .esticular damage has also been observed ^nTnon         " ~  19'5) '
   terret, red 1% DEHP for 14 months (S2 « al.  S8" SPeCieS' Che
                        try
  trations in 5-veek-old JCL^?«ar^ ?      f   r ^ Serum zinc Concen-
  the diet for one week (Oishi and H^ga'^SO)?" '% °f
      At high doses  (4.9 a/kz^  HPHP ^-
  adenosine triphoaphatai. aS b.Sf^l     P-5 SUCCinic ^hydrogenase,
  (Seth^t al. 1976) and produces JoSn^T^? leVelS in rat  8OMdi
  1972) and in mice orally  (agi et          "117 (Slngh    a1
  2 g DEHP/kg/day was
                                 out
 eternal weight gain and increase ^ res'orp ioTf ?** ^^ ^ d—e
 and above.  At 0.4  and U  all of ^Sorpt^on rates at doses of 0.2% DEHP
 the malformation rate was increased at £pla?ted °V* died 1- utero and
 significance p^O.05) compared with the            °'2% §r°UP
   mg/kg/d^y  (Shioc
lung «uDp/            aa°nS "e" "ot=d to h™ f«al
ha»Ster celis (UO™/
S1H.  1976, Ishidate and
                                 .                     °e
    25 hours   co 1 x 10-3,  10-4,oo-3 v
                                     '
                                                              T

-------
patch  test  followed by  a  challenge  application 7 days later.   No erythema
or other reactions were observed  (Shaffer _et j.1. 1945).

5.1.2  DMP

     No increased incidence of neoplasms  was noted in female  rats admini-
stered up to 8% DMP in  the diet for  two years;  however,  adverse effects
on growth were noted  in the 4 and 8% DMP  treatment groups  and chronic
nephritis among rats  in the 82 treatment  group  (Lehman 1955).

     Increased resorption, increased fetal deaths,  decreased  fetal weight,
and gross and skeletal  abnormalities in rats followed intraperitoneal
injection of pregnant dams with doses of  0.338  ml/kg  DMP or larger doses
on days 5,  10, and 15 of  gestation  (Singh_et .§1.  1972).  DMP  was also
highly embryotoxic in chick embryo studies (Haberman  et. ail. 1968, lijo
1975, Bower-.et al. 1970,  Lee ejt al.  1974a).  Administration of 1400 mg
DMP/kg/day  by gavage  to young male rats for 4 days  had no  effect on
testicular  tissue or zinc excretion  (Foster et.  al.  1980).  No information
on the mutagenic effects  of DMP was  found.

     •In humans, ingestion of DMP has been reported  to cause irritation of
the buccal mucosa, nausea, vertigo,'vomiting, coma, and  a  decrease in
blood pressure (Doehring  and Albritton 1944).   DMP  is not  a skin irritant
but does produce a painful sensation if applied directly to the eyes or
mucous membranes (Gosselin et al. 1976).

5.1.3  PEP

     No long-term feeding, carcinogenicity or reproductive studies con-
ducted with DEP are available.  Rubin JMC  al.  (1979) reported  that DEP
was mutagenic in the Ames Salmonella assay in the base-pair mutant strain
TA 100 in the absence of metabolic activation.   Adding the liver micro-
somal fraction to the culture eliminated  this response.

     Skeletal abnormalities were observed in 30-50% of rat fetuses from
dams injected intraperitoneally with 0.5-1.7 ml/kg DEP on days  5,  10,
and 15 of gestation (Singh e_t al.  1972).   Injection of DEP into  fertilized
chick eggs was teratogenic (lijo 1975)  and also  increased embryo mortality
(Bower .et £l. 1970).   Foster and coworkers (1980) noted  no change in
testicular  tissue in young male rats given 1600  mg DEP/kg/day by gavage
for 4 days.

     Short-term feeding studies with rats at dietary  levels of  0.2%  and
above produced a reduction in body weight gain  and enlargement  of the
liver and other organs  (Brown et ail. 1978, Moody and  Reddy 1978).   On
the other hand, mice showed no signs of toxicity during  a 6-week study
consisting of daily intraperitoneal  injections with 125  mg/kg DEP.
Autopsy ravealed peritonitis in all  animals (Galley e_t al.  1966) .   In
humans, the lowest reported oral lethal dose of  DEP is 500 tag/kg (RT2CS
1977).

-------
   5.1.4  DBP




                                                            °£~  rats  fed diets
               »g/kg DBP
                                                                          /
                                          DBP and above l
      rat,lc        chtc   (Wen T* ""^ Cera"S
   "  al.  1968,  Petars  and                '        — ^'  197°-
       -         P'a"
                               op           -Jat
  gestation resulted in decreased SItSS veilh? 2ain a-
  resorption rate at the 1.0Z level (^2100 ms/S/dfv)         1"creased
  exos                             -       rog/Kg/day).
                       e   .    evel  (^2100 ms//dv)    Of
  exposed in the 17 zrmm  ^i« T    -,      rog/Kg/day).   Of  the  fetuses
  compound for one
 in Chinese h^ter'cells i^LISS  £ O^T^ToBlrlrLrs
 triced*   risis                              "3' Verti8"'
 5.1.5  BBP
reporhatr^antra" ^S £S aVaUable'  ^» ^ ^  (19
3 times weekly for 8 weeks with un to «nn   I ln^cte^ ia t rap eri tonally

incidence of pulmonary adenomas compared wit'hf 1  ™ d±S^^ ™ increa
(0.20 lun  tumo                                     '         contro
                         enomas compared with
 (0.20 lung  tumors/mouse  for  the 800 mg/k/BBP
 controls).  Negative carcinoaeni? »ff   ,       §    P  VS  °'19  for  saline
 1-22 33P in the diet for 103 ^ effe"sjwere noted for  36C3F1  mice  fed

 concentration to Fischer 3" !at~M     ^^ adminis"^ion  of  chis

 incidence of Uu^S f^aU Lt^ ^.d^n aSS°CifC£d ^Ch  »  ^r.
denca of this lesion in simi^ ^       -       variaole and hi-her inc—

3BP ».  noc                                                            "
                                                                     increased

-------
Male rats were not adequately  tested  in  this  study  (NCI  1981).

     Rubin  et al.  (1979)  reported  no  mutagenic  activity  for BBP in the
Ames Salmonella  system  in either strain  TA  98 (frameshift  mutant)  or
Ta  100  (base-pair mutant).

     Injection of BBP into  the chorio-allantoic membrane of chick  embryos
increased embryo mortality  when compared with controls (Haberman et_ al.
1963) and daily  intraperitoneal injection of  500 mg/kg BBP into rniceTor
6 weeks resulted in pathological changes in the liver and  spleen, including
periportal  hepatitis and  extra medullary hematopoiesis in  both  the liver
and spleen  (Galley ei: al. 1966).

5.1.6  DNOP

     No carcinogenic, mutagenic, reproductive, or chronic studies were
available for this ester.   Increased  embryo mortality was  noted in the
chick embryo exposed to OOP, but mortality values for controls  were also
elevated.  Five of 66 DOP-treated chicks, however, exhibited neurologic
abnormalities (Haberman et  al. 1968).

     Foster jst al. (1980) observed no adverse effects in testicular
tissue or zinc excretion in young male rats given 2800 mg  DNOP/kg/day
by gavage for 4 days.  Similar findings  were  noted for rats administered
2% mono-n-octyl phthalate,  the major metabolite  of DNOP, in the diet for
one week (Oishi and Hiraga  1980).

     Oral administration of 500 or 1000 mg/kg DNOP to male Wistar  rats
and dd strain mice for 48 weeks produced interstitial nephritis in all
mice and approximately one-half of the rats at  1000 mg/kg with  some
evidence of the disorder present in both species at the  500 mg/kg  level
(Negasaki st al.  1974).

     The only data  available on humans were  results  of skin testing with a
10% solution of DOP.   A slight skin reaction was observed  in 13 of  100
test subjects (Mallette and Von Haam 1952).

5.1.7  Overview

     The ubiquitous use of phthalate esters  in our society, and recent
discoveries that  phthalate plasticizers leach from polyvinyl chloride
blood bags and other biomedical devices have raised concerns regarding
the safety of phthalate esters to  humans.  Phthalates have been found in
human tissues but appear to be linked to individuals who  have received
blood transfusions or hemodialysis  therapy.

     It  has  recently  been demonstrated that  DEHP is  a liver carcinogen in
both sexes of Fischer 344 rats administered  1.2% DEHP in  the diet  for
2 years; and in both sexes of 36C3F1 niice administered 0.3% DEHP in  the
diet,  producing hepatocallular carcinoma and aeo-plastic  nodules.   No
                                  5-3

-------
  as:
  centration of 0.2% DEHP  neural
 scered 0.9 g DEHP/kg/dy for
                                                    ii JUlia;  at  a  con-
                                                           "" adnlni-
 also reported  in a non- rodent  species  ^        §) '  Testicular d^age  was
 for 14 months.                species, the ferret, administered 1% DEHP

         hav, produced

"on rate and neural tube
administerad « DBF in the   ecrin
esters  directly into developing chick
BBP,  or DMP and a siml.  i

questions as to the


3.2  HUMAN  EXPOSURE

                                                £rom
                                                  A"
                                                  "ere.notad
                                                JIn;lsctl01' of Phthalate
                                         produced no «rata with  DBP,
2.2.1  Food
                                       FDA regulates  che use of

-------
 phthalate esters in food packaging.   Table 5-3 shows the approved uses
 that might result in the migration of phthalates into foods.  DEHP, DEP,
 DBF,  and BBP are approved for one or more of these uses, however, DEHP
 is only approved for use in the packaging of foods with high water con-
 tent (as opposed to high fat content).   Table 5-4 contains allowed uses
 of phthalate esters that would probably not result in migration of
 phthalates into foods.   DNOP and DMP are approved for one or more of
 these uses (Shibko and  Blumenthal 1973).  Generally, these regulations
 are supported by rates  of migration.  Unfortunately, it is difficult to
 use such data when estimating dietary intake.  Though most foods indi-
 cate low or no detectable residues of phthalate esters, fatty foods
 show higher residues.

      Pfab (1967) placed cheese and lard in contact with film containing
 150 ug  DBP/cm2 for one  month at  25°C.   Less  than 1% of  the plasticizer
 migrated into the food, and concentrations in the food  were less than
 2  mg/kg DBP.  ^Woggon and Koehler (1967) found levels of DEHP of less
 than 3  mg/kg in food as a result of  migration from food wrap.

      Tomita e_t al.  (1977)  investigated  residues of DEHP and DBP in
 Japanese foods.   They found levels of up to  80  mg/kg in tempura powder,
 and up  to 60  mg/kg in instant cream  soup.

      To investigate  further  the contamination  of food  by  phthalate
 esters,  FDA undertook a survey in 1974.   The  survey was  conducted in
 seventeen districts  where  they collected food,  including margarine,
 processed American cheese,  meat  (bacon,  weiners,  or ground beef),  ready
 to  eat  cereal,  eggs, milk,  white  bread,  canned  corn,  corn  meal,  and
 baked beans.   Most  samples  contained DEHP  levels  of less than  1  mg/kg
 Table 5-J  illustrates the  results  for DEHP.   FDA (1974fa) stated  that the
 concentration levels reported  for milk  and cheese  were  considered  un-
 reliable  because  of  problems with sample contamination.  However,  we
 have  included  them as a maximum  expected concentration.  Table  5-5  also
 includes  the  levels  reported  for  fish by FDA  (1974a).

     The  diffusion of phthalates  from PVC milk  tubing has  been extensive-
 ly  studied  (Wildbrett 1973).   These studies,  however, primarily  investi-
 gate  the  rates of extraction and not ultimate concentrations in milk
 reaching  the consumer.  Thus,  this work has limited use  in assessing
 risk.  Table 5-6  shows  food items containing  DEHP, and the average  per
 capita consumption as reported by the USDA (1978).  Using  these values,
 the estimated maximum consumption would be about 2 mg/day/person.   Be-'
 cause certain persons consume  larger amounts of these foods than those
 indicated in Table 5-6,  a worst case example was established assuming a
diet comprised of 10% fat containing 56 mg/kg DEHP.  This value was
based on^a maximum level found in margarine (lipid basis).   Assuming a
consumption of 2 kg  food/day/person,  a maximum exposure  would be 11.2 ng/
day/aerson.
                                  5-10

-------
            TABLE 5-1  APPROVED USES OF PHTHALATE ESTERS THAT
                       COULD RESULT IN MIGRATION INTO FOODS*
  Regulation No.       Approved Uses


                      Substances  employed in the manufacture of food
                      packaging material  (section 5.2.1)


  121'2511             Plasticizers  in  polymeric  substances


  121-2514             Resinous  and polymeric coatings
 121.2550            Closurs3
                                                        poljolefin


121.2507            CeUophan.
                                    21                       ^
                                5-11

-------
          TABLE 5-4.  APPROVED USES OF PHTHALATE ESTERS THAT
                      UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS  OF USE WOULD
                      NOT REASONABLY  BE  EXPECTED TO RESULT IN
                      MIGRATION  INTO  FOODS
Regulation No.      Approved Uses

121.2577            Pressure-sensitive adhesives


121.2562            Rubber articles intended  for repeated  use


121.2571            Components of paper and paperboard  in  contact  with
                    dry food
121.2519            Defearning agents used in the manufacture of  paper
                    and paperboard
121.2529            Adhesives
Sources:  Code of Federal Regulations 21 (1972) and Shibko and Blumenthal
         (1973).
                                  3-12

-------
        TABLE 5-5.   RESIDUES OF DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALAT? IN FOODS
Food


baked beans
corn meal
canned corn
white bread
eggs.
cereal
meat
bacon
weiners
ground beef
Total meat
margarine
processed American
cheese
milk
fish
No.
Samples

34
34
34
34
34
34

11
21
2
34
34

34
34
77
No.
Detected

7 (21%)
21 (62%)
8 (24%)
22 (64%)
17 (50%)
21 (62%)

8 (73%)
11 (52%)
0
19 (56%)
13 (38%)

30 (88%)
30 (88%)
43**(56%)
Concentration
Mean
(of all samples)
trace
0.2
trace
0.1
0.1
0.2

0.7
0.3
0
0.6
2.5*

5.4*
7.9*
0.2
(mg/k?
Maxim

2.0
2.3
• o.i
1.2
0.6
3.4

3.0
1.2
0
3.0
56.3*

35.3*
31.4*
7.1
Source:  FDA (1974a,fa)
* Twenty-nine  of  these were below  0  ?  ,a/kB  -nH
  co  laboratory contamination.             §
                                                    suspect due
                                5-13

-------
     TABLE 5-6.   CONSUMPTION OF DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL)  PHTHALATE IN FOOD
                  Average  Daily         	Intake  (me/dav)
Food Consumption* (g/day) Average
baked beans
corn meal
canned corn
white bread
eggs
cereal
meat
margarine**
processed American
.cheese**
milk**
fish
Total
7.0
9.6
7.1
12.0
43.5
37
210
15.5
13.3
230
21.4

trace
0.002
trace
0.01
0.004
0.01
0.13
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.004
0.25
Maximum
0.01
0.02
0.001
0.14
0.03
0.13
0.63
0.69
0.12
0.14
0.15
2.1
Sources:  USDA (1978), FDA (1974a, b), USDA (1972).
 *Please note that some of the categories of consumption do not exactly
  fit the sampled food items.  For example, consumption of all meat,
  bread rolls,  and biscuits are included; whereas only certain
  items within these groups were sampled.  No estimate of consumption
  was found for baked beans, so 7.0 g/day was assumed.

**Consumption of these foods has been corrected for fat content: mar-
  garine, 80% fat;  cheese,  25% fat; and milk,  2% fat.
                                 5-14

-------
 5-2.2  Drinking Water
       in ten clCles reported DEHP  DBF  and DEP in°
 locations.   The maximum reported  evel' was 30 L/i       -
 Florida.  Morita at al  riQ7/^               S/  DEHP  ln
 •ni DBP can° be refifhur J^'^TJS*,.^ e8Be"""i«»-
 in both r« and created -ace? ""        " ;  h°°eV"' "«•«««<>«
 DEHP va, 1000 ug/1
 that che intake of
                                                               demonstrate
                                                                 3£  -02-
5.2.3  Inhalation

5-2.3.1  Occupational
 are
 previous  Actions  of
                                      '    "     6

the predominant esters
                                          ^
                                                alkyl Phth^tes are
    trial Hygienists  for
    an-reconnnen
s 0.1 ag/n3 DB?
               ed ?C3
                                                   -
                                          standard  :or  concencrani
                                                             ence  of
                                                                  on
                                5-15

-------
                           TABLE 5-7.  CONCENTRATIONS OF PHTHALATE ESTERS IN DRINKING WATER
                                                         Concentration (uR/1)
C/l
I
Location

Miami, FL

Philadelphia, PA

Lawrence, MA

Terrebonne Parish, LA

Seattle, WA

Ot Cumwa, Iowa

New York, NY

Cincinnati, OH

Tokyo, Japan
  shallow welIs

  raw water

  cleaned water
  (after coagulation)

  tap water

Pacific Northwest -
  25 water supplies
DEHP
30
0.5
0.8
0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
DNBP
5
0.05
0.01
0.02
5
0.1
ND
ND
	 	 • •' 	 • • ' 	 " -'-
DNOP DEP
— 1
0.05
0.04
ND
0.01
ND
0.01
0.1
                                              ND
 ND
                                             2.7 mean  4.5 mean
                                             1.8

                                             1.8
3.4

2.3
PMP        Source

      U.S.  EPA (1975)

      U.S.  EPA (1975)

      U.S.  EPA (1975)

      U.S.  EPA (1975)

      U.S.  EPA (1975)

      U.S.  EPA (1975)

      U.S.  EPA (1975)

      U.S.  EPA (1975)


      Morita et al.  (1974)

      Morita £t a_l.  (1974)


      Morita et ail.  (1974)

      Morita et al.  (1974)
                                         ND at 15    ND at 10   ND at 10  ND at 10  ND at 10 STORET
               ND-=not  detected.
               llyphen=not sampled or not reported .

-------
   3-2-3.2  General Population
                                             discu
   and distribution of phthalates  i*rt         discussion of the fate

   ^^L-jiS^
     ^                      rsd ~< ^ -    ^r;s l13
                             1°haUti°n "P""" «»»  >
                                 5=== -
                                                                 8...
rCerDEH,BBpBEp,::rLethat ma7 ^ «P°^ »  P**-'".
(Holzer and Oro 1976).  PhthaL^es h,™ h "P""1"1 in «S«rette smoke

1975), which MT be  £he source  of %heDhEh^ T'""" la "baCC° (Peaka11

tion during burnin.                           "ther than  the to"»a-
                             o    eDEh
 tion during burning.  Hovevr  cnti  ,
 analyses .   Hol2er °n, Qrl n%7^

 •ir rtth cig^fcL3"!0,:0 ^ uS'SSJe"™      -

 smoke may  be  higher; however  no inf!   ,'  *•  ™ lnhaled "ainstream
 of exposure.         However, no information is available on this  rype
5'2'4  Per»al Absorption
                               ud    absorption °f
low (see  section i. 1 . -)   ".£* \"' 'T"8 =°"«ntratlons  in water ar,
vouid  result in lov ,XDO3uce '   "°""o1 "umans or »"«  "iti. P'/C

-------
 such  as  cosmetics  and  insect  repellent,  would  result in a higher expo-
 sure;  section  5.1.1, however,  indicated  that patch  tests with undiluted
 DEHP  resulted  in no  irritation after  7 days exposure.   All of the
 phthalates  considered  here have a  low dermal toxicity  in the  range of
 3-20  g/kg,  which is well above the  expected use  levels  in cosmetics
 and repellents.  However, the  long-term  effects  of  such exposure are
 unknown.

 5.2.5  Medical Exposures

      Humans may be exposed to  phthalate  esters through  tubing and fluid
 storage  bags used  in medical  practice.   Though this  exposure  route is
 widespread, only a small subpopulation would receive continuous  exposure.

    .Blood  stored  in PVC blood  bags has  been shown  to contain DEHP
 (Jaeger  and Rubin  1970).  Jaeger and  Rubin (1973) found that  blood
 accumulates 0.25 mg DEHP/100 ml/day over a 21-day period.   They  also
 found  that  persons receiving  from 4 to 63 units  of blood received from
 14 to  600 mg DEHP depending on  the  storage time  for  each unit of blood
 (see Table  E-6, Appendix E).  Although these persons died  as  a result
 of other causes, a survivor of  such a transfusion would not receive
 continuous  exposure.  On the other hand, cryoprecipitate packs may con-
 tain 0.8-1.9 mg DEHP.  Although  this  level is lower  than that found in
 blood, hemophiliacs may receive 400 bags of cryoprecipitates/year
 (Marcel  1973).  Thus, a hemophiliac may receive  2 mg DEHP/day.   It
 should be noted, however, that  not all hemophiliacs  receive cryoprecipi-
 tates.

     Phthalate esters may also be released to  blood or other fluid from
 PVC tubing.  Exposure may occur  through a IV apparatus,  especially dur-
 ing a  long-term hospitalization, such as in the  case of  a  burn victim.
 However, blood concentrates DEHP more efficiently than  aqueous solutions,
 and thus would be more of a problem in cardiopulmonary  bypass and hemo-
 dialysis apparatus.  Jaeger and Rubin (1970) found that  plasma circu-
 lating for 4 hours in medical tubing contained 0.01-0.05 mg/ml DEHP.
 Jaeger and Rubin (1973) found 9.24 mg DEHP/100 ml blood  after  3 hours
 of circulation in a Travenol hemodialysis unit; however, 7.75  mg/100  ml
were found initially.  An increase in blood concentration  from 5.04  to
 5.70 mg DEHP/100 ml was observed after 5 hours  circulation in  a Travenol
 cardiopulmonary bypass unit.   Fayz  _e_t  _§_!. (1977)  points  out that equil-
 ibrium concentrations in blood would not be reached because DEHP  may
 accumulate in body tissue.

     Christensen e_t £l. (1976) reported releases  of DEP  from medical
 tubing that was primarily DEHP and PVC.   They  found a maximum of  50 mg
 DEP/1  in blood after a long perfusion time (7  days).  These results are
 surprising sinca DE? was not an original component of the  tubing.
                                  3-L3

-------
Assuming a 5-
DEHP per
1.5 mg DEHP/100 ml in the
(Jaeger and Rubin 1973).

5.3 SUMMARY
                           s apparatus
                         concentration of
                    attribuCad to PVC tubing
                        low; DEHP
average exposure levelsTrabouTo ^/Lv^?*7 Source°f DEHP/with
2 mg/day. Intakes from drinking water inL^M ^^ UvelS °f about
low in comparison, although ocwoationli     ' and absorPtion are
s-s^asssss-r

-------
                      6.0   BIOTIC  EFFECTS  AND  EXPOSURE
       EFFECTS ON
  6-1-1  Aquatic Organ j
  Presence"
  tebrate species (and a
  species are combined.
                           ''
                                                                «•
                                               °"
                                           at    '
                                          Data on marine and freshwater
                                                          the more toxic
                                                          ^ teStinS DEHP
                                                          its relative
 0-7                          g   DBpandDE       p
 of  the  two  compounds;  however  the or oh? !          Wa
 (see  Section  6.1.1.1)  Pre^Int ' drawing con'Lslo'nf **
 toxxcity.   The  only  data  available™ ^nclu^lons a
 of  Phthalate  esters  pertained to  Ingested DEHP  o
 cess  in two species  of fish.  A levfl  nJn nf   „ ^  reProdu"ive suc-
 reproduction  in zebra fish    It ll^ff   °;°5 mg/kg in food  red"^d
LC50 values (lethal  conc^ra ion  to  W^f 'th'! co^" *•"  data with
different exposure routes were invo?voH    1    PoPulation)  because
effects  at levels greater S2 29 ^/l In wat'er   "
only LC5Q reportedfor
effect on egg mortaliy
^arable studies on
                                               conciusions
                                  speci she'raL'b" ^       '     6
                                   ^
                                       '       *** mor£ali^ but had no
ranged from 1.9 mg/1 to 92
effects were reported at
                                            v
                                          Phthalate^
                                                          Acute LC.ns
                                                      Reproductive'0
                                        and aasorption  onto  glass  and'

-------
TABLE 6-1,   ^PORTED EFFECTS  OF »HTHAtATE  ESTE3S  OH  FISH
                a)   Exposure  Through Water
Concentration
Comoound ("Kj/11
OBP .731
1.2
1.3
2.91
5.47
10.0
OEHP .005
.014
> 10.0
100.0
3BP 43.3
W5.0
DEP 29.6
98.2
DMP 49.5
OHP 58. 0
Slueglll, fathead minnow, channel

Compound Concentration
OEHP 50 ng/g food
'00 ng/g food
Species
3lucg1ll
(Lepomls macrachlrusl
•
Fathead Minnow
[Plmepnales prone las)
Channel Catfish
(Ictalurus aunctatus i
Rainbow Trout
ISalmo qairdnerli
aiueglll
(Lepgmls, macroehlrus)
Rainbow Trout
(Saliao galranerl)
Flsn1
Slueglll
(Lepoml* MCrochlrus)
81ueg111
Sheepshead .Minnow
(Cygrinodon yarleqatus)
Sheepshead Minnow
(Cyprinodon. varlegatusi
Slueglll
(Lesomls macroehlrus)
(Lepomls tnacrochlrus)
Sheepshead Minnow
(Cyprinoden varleqatus)
catfish and rainbow trout.
b) Exposure Through
Species
Zebra F1sh
(Sracnvdanio ~rio)

Guopy
(Poee-iHa ratleuUtusl
Effect
96 hr. LC5Q
96 hr. LC5Q
96 hr. LCM
96 hr. LCjg-
96 hr. LCSQ
96 hr. LC5Q
No effect level
on sac fry
mortality
(100 days)
Significant
Increase
(P < 0.05) In
• sac fry morta 1 1 ty
96 hr. LC50
96 hr. LC5Q
96 hr. LC5(J
96 hr. LC5Q
96 hr. LCSQ
96 hr. LC5Q
96 hr. LCSO
96 hr. LC5Q
tngestlon
Effect
.More spawns,
fewer eggs per
spawn, fewer
oercentage
survival
Sligntly signer
se'-esnc soortions,
slignt eduction
in lumoer of 'ry
(not TUCH Jiff.
'"rom control )
Conditions
17'C, static
static
17'C, static
17*C, static
12*C. static
not reported
10*C, flow-
through
10*C, flow-
through
17"C, static
not reported
Static
static
static
static
static
static

Conditions


Source
Mayer i Sanders
(1973)
U.S. EPA (1978)
Mayer 1 Sanders
(1973)
Mayer 1 Sanders
(1973)
Mayer i Sanders
(1973)
Julin (1975)
as citea 
-------
                       TABLE S-8.   REPORTED EFFECTS OF PHTHAUTE ESTERS ON AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES
DEHP
Concentration
(rag/1)
.
0.10 (0.0034-0.2)
0.31 (0.02-0.6)


1.0

2.1
Irt A
1Q.O
10



10-50
0.003
0.01



0.03



1.0
2.0
11.1
13.0


32.0
3. IS



Species
Marine Olnoflagellate
(Gymnod1n1un preve)
„


Mud Crab
tRhlthropanooeus harr1s11)

Sruri
JvUO
(GaiMiarus pseudollmnae.Kl
Crayfish
(OreoneetM nals)
Brine Shrimp
(Artemla saHna)



Grass Shrimp
(Palaemonetes puqlo)
Oaphnla
(Paohnla rcagna)
M



„



Grass Shrimp
(Palaemonetes puqlo 1
Oaphnla
(Oaphnla inaqnal
H


Scud
(Gammarus 3se
-------
TABLE 6-2.   REPORTED EFFECTS OF PHTHAUTE ESTERS ON AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES (Continued)
Concentration
Compound '"q/11

asp 1.9

2.4




3.7

9.63
92.3
OEP 4.5 (3.0-6.1)

7.59
10

28.2 (23.5-33.0)
50



52.1
OMP 1.0

10

33.0
331
73.7
75.0 (54.0-96.0)

100
i.3 (125.0-135.3)

Soeeies
Oaphnla
(Oaphnla maqna)

„

Effect
48 hr. LC3Q



Conditions
Lake water with
250 ppm fulvic
acid added


Source
Hirzy at al.
(1973)'~ ~~


River water with Hirzy at aj..



„

Mysid Shrimp
(Mysidoosij bahla)
Oaphnla
(Oaphnla maqna)
Marine Olnoflagellate
(Gymnod1n1um breve)

Mysld Shrimp
(Hysidposis oahla)
Brine Shrimp
(ArtewU sallnal

Marine Olnoflagellate
(Symnodlnlua breve)
Brine Shrimp
(Artemia sallna)



Oaphnla
(Oaphnva maqna 1
Mud Crab
(Rhlthrooanopeus harr1s11l

Srine Shrimp
(Art ami a sallnal

Oaphnia
(Dapnnia maqnai
-

Marine Olnoflagellate
(Gymnodlnium breve)

Srass Shrimo
'. Pa 1 aemonetes jugio)
.'tartne Olnoflaqellate
(Symnodimum jreve)





96 hr. LC5Q
48 hr. LC5Q
Median growth
limit concen-
tration
96 hr. LC5Q
Hatching success
did not vary
from control
96 hr. LCM
Hatching success
significantly
lower than
controls
(p < 0.05)
48 hr. LCSQ
Old not signifi-
cantly alter
larvae develop-
ment
Hatching success
did not vary
from control
48 hr. LC5Q
LC50

Median Growth
Hm1t concen-
tration

36 «r. LC.Q
natural cone.
of 250 ppm
fulvic acid

Lake water only
static
static •
25'C

static
25'C, pH 3.3

25"C
26'C, pH 8.3



static
25-C, 15S
salinity

25°C, pH 3.3

static
not reported

25°C

22°C, 151
salinity
25<>C
(1978)



Hirzy et al.
(1978)
U.S. EPA (1978)
U.S. EPA (1978)
Wilson et
aj_. (1978)

U.S. EPA (1978)
Sugawara (1974)

Wilson «
JL (1971)
Sugawara (1974)



U.S. EPA (1978)
Laugh 1 In at
al- (1977)

Sugawara (1974)

U.S. iPA (1978)
Hirzy at al.
(1978)
Wilson it
iL- 0973)

Laugnlin «r
1L (1977)
^flson it
a 1 . 1 1 973)
                                      3—-i

-------
                                      £i°chroush
                    ci                                               —
   after mixing was  742 of  t   i^         i   ratl°n measured  immediately

   et al. 1977).  Droplets  of phthSll",   ".^ Concentra
 unmodifi.d lake water \LC* -TS me/n'  M JLC5S " 13*° mg/1) than ^
 1978) report BBP as havinfa hl»h     i  u .flth°ugh Hir2^ a"d coworkers
 not vary significantly i^the dx^e're'nt  me'dif'  ^  ^^"^ leVels  did
 not describe how the  test  was conducted    Th±   Unfortunatel?>  ^hey  did

                                  "             "
6'1-1'2  Relative Toxicitv of
                     ,.   the six phthaiates
toxlcitv under identical cond't^ons and -       ^ C° ^SU^ their
several st.ecies.   So available ^ H •     ^° aXamine =heir affec£s ^
snip becveen che  six "thalates    ? ^^.^stlgated this relacion-
in che same experiment.   Table ^-3  IrTsll Its^  ?nfalaC2s  "««  =escad
coxicicy reported in the literature             °      °* ?hchaiaca
                                 3-:

-------
                               TABLE 6-3.  THE RELATIVE TOXICITY OF  PHTHALATES
                                           TO AQUATIC ORGANISMS
 Order
 OBP-  DLP>  OMP
 Species

 Brine  Shrimp
 (Artemia  salina)
 Type of Study

 Reproduction and
 Development
Source

Sugawara  (1974)
 I)UP>  OMP
 Grass  Shrimp
 (Palaemonetes pugio)
                                                       Development
                               Laughlin  et  aj..  (1977)
 DLHP> BUP  (plain  lake
           water)

 BOP- DEHP  (water with
           250 nig/1
           tulvic acid)
 Daphnia
 (Daphnia magna)
Acute  toxicity
Itirzy et  al.  (1978)
     DEI IP
         1
Scud
(Gammarus pseudolimnaeus)
                                                       Acute toxicity
                               Sanders   et  aj.   (1973)
DBP> DEHP
         1
Fish
(Pimephales promelas.
 Lepomis Macrochirus.
 Ictalurus punctatus.
 Salmo gairdneri
                                                       Acute toxicity
                              Mayer  &  Sanders  (1973)
DBP. DtP> DMP> DEHP
                   1
Marine Dinoflagellate
(Gymnodinium breve)
Acute toxicity
                                                                                     Wilson  et  aK   (1978)
 (he low solubility of DEHP may attribute to this ranking.

-------
                                         .
  other phthalates, were generally observ^ It  es .reaterh
  le xs possible, therefore, -that DEEP is '
-------
 not reported.  In several metabolism studies  (Mehrle and Mayer  1976
 Mayer 1976, Stalling et al. 1973) on fish  (fathead minnows, rainbow'
 trout, channel catfish), DEHP was found to metabolize into monoesters
 and phthalic acid.  The monoesters were predominant; this was attributed
 to the more polar metabolites being excreted.  No information on the
 toxicity or monoesters to fish were available; therefore, it was unclear
 whether the metabolic process was one of detoxification.

 5.1.2  Terrestrial Organisms

      Acute toxicity data on bird species were only available for two
 phthalates, DBF and OOP.   Both compounds were reported to be non-toxic
 at levels  of 5000 mg/kg administered in the diet (Heath _et al.  1972).

      Another study analyzed the effects on the eggs  of ring doves
 (Streptopelia risorla)  administered DBF and DEHP in  the diet (Peakall
 1974).   No significant  changes were reported in the  eggs of birds fed
 10 mg/kg DEHP (exposure time not reported).  At the  same concentration
 DBP caused a decrease in  eggshell thickness (p <_ 0.01),  a reduction in'
 egg weight (p ^< 0.01),  an increase in  shell permeability to water
 (p _< 0.05), and an increased rate of water loss (p <_ 0.05).   Egg weight '
 and shell  thickness  recovered  to normal measures  when DBP-exposed birds
 were fe'd a clean diet for an unspecified period of time.

      No  information  on  the  acute toxicity  of  DEHP to  birds  was  available.
 Based  on the Peakall (1974)  study and other mammalian studies,  however
 it is  unlikely  that  DEHP  is  more toxic  to  birds than  DBP.   Additional
 data  are needed  on DEHP's effects  on birds  and other  wildlife species
 because'of  the  compound's widespread use and  existence  in  the environment.

 6.2  EXPOSURE TO  BIOTA

     Aquatic organisms are potentially  exposed  to phthalate esters
 through contact with water.  In  a  survey of major river basins  (STORET)
 concentrations of DBP, DNOP, DEP,  DMP,  and DEHP are usually reported
within the  range of  0-10 ug/1.   Some incidences of all these phthalates
have occurred at concentrations  in the  10-100 ug/1 range.  DBP and DEHP
were both found at concentrations  of 100-1000 ug/1 in two river basins,
 the south central lower Mississippi River Basin and the Western Gulf
River Basin.  Other  investigations have  reported even higher concentra-
 tions of other phthalates (see section 4.1).

     It is  difficult to generalize about phthalate concentrations in
marine and  estuarine waters.  The  STORET data did not include marine
open waters but did include some estuarine habitats at mouths of major
rivers.  In these locations, average concentrations for DBP and DEHP
were higher than other river basin concentrations (see section 4.1).
Perhaps this implies a greater risk zo organisms inhabiting these lower
river/estuarine habitats.   Concentrations reported in the Mississippi
Delta were  also high.  The few open water marine water concentrations
reported vere considerably lower than freshwater concentrations  (see
section 4.11.

                                   6-3

-------
                               tthe
 tion available  indicates th»t rt.        of  rlver systems.  The Inrorma-
 environment  with  the only loss.»  com?ou"d 'lows through the aquatic
 4.2).   Depending  on the dyn^cs S^SaT.SV*11-" ("e secti-


 "here  ..dimencatloToccu™'  surt  if  a«™"l"ed la the sediment;  thus
 concentrations of         '                  ^ " *

rivers  (e.g., in Oreson) cannor %f !  !      ,       °f other COI°Parable
data are  collected!                determined until more comprehensive
                                   ••—=•"



DEHP, therefore
ment^ of DBF
incidences  of  level  greater than
tion on other  phthalaCs was
apparently  bioconcentrate at
                   '
                                                 concentrations of
                                                  The f- -asure-
                                         enerally lower, although two
                                               aquatic organisms

-------

-------
                        7.0  RISK CONSIDERATIONS



  7.1  METHODOLOGY
                   of the

                                                as a proxy for


                      of dose/response data Co eh. Depopulation
                                                                  of
effects of BEHP  on humanso           •   ™  Potential  carcinogenic
                  h~"                                  thr°ugh ««-
       the actual carcinogenicity of DEEP to humans

       Assuming that  the  positive findings indeed provide a
       basis for extrapolation to humans, the estimation  J
       equivalent human doses involves


-------
 In  dealing with  the  extensive  uncertainties  inherent  in  extrapolation
 to  humans, we  applied  three  commonly-used  dose-response  models  in order
 to  establish a range of potential human  risk.

      In  this risk assessment,  we have  also chosen  to  compare  the exposure
 and effects data for animals with the  corresponding data for  humans.   Several
 scenarios were developed to compare the lowest reported  effects  levels
 for several phthalates with maximum and possible exposures of humans
 to phthalates.   The  margins  of safety  (ratios of effects levels  to
 exposure  levels) that  result were examined.  This  process  can demonstrate
 the relative risk of various phthalate esters, and provides some indica-
 tion  of  the significance of  phthalate  esters as a  potential environmental
 hazard to humans in  areas other than carcinogenicity.

      In  the case of  risks to other forms of biota, insufficient  data  are
 available on most toxic effects and on exposure values to  assess risk
 quantitatively.  However, possible risks to various species can  be
 described and  are presented herein.

 7.2   HUMAN EXPOSURE

      A series  of possible exposure scenarios  for humans,  with an indica-
 tion  of  the size of  the population at  risk, possible exposure routes  and
 levels, and key assumptions in the exposure estimates are  presented in
 Table 7-1.  Data for this table were developed in  other  sections of the
 report.  For the general population,  exposure to phthalates,  as indicated
 by exposure to DEHP, results primarily from food ingestion.   By  comparison,
water ingestion and  inhalation of ambient  air account for  much less
 exposure.  The combined exposure level for an "average individual"
 (average in that the person has a "normal" diet and "average" water
 drinking habits)  would be about 0.27 mg/day DEHP.   The maximum exposure
 could be as much as  10 mg/day.

      Certain subpopulations might have significantly greater exposure
 to phthalates.   Persons who work in plastics  manufacture or in formula-
 tion,  calendering,  or other processes  in which phthalate esters  are
used,  might have exposures as high as  6.3 mg/kg/8-hour exposure.  Note
 that  this is a worst case exposure value reported  in the literature and
may not represent current manufacturing processes.   Hospital patients
who receive large quantities of blood, or who  are dialyzed  regularly,
 could also receive fairly large exposure to DEHP or other  phthalates.
These populations are probably small.  Another worst case  consists of a
small population who eat primarily a high fat content diet of pre-
packaged foods.  In  the example presented here,  the person's  diet was
assumed to be equivalent to 2 kg/day and containing 10%  fat.   This
represents an upper  level exposure  for  this subpopulation  (11  rug/day).
                                  •^ i

-------
           ibunb  eating
           average  diet
                 d« Ink lug water
                                                       221 X  1(1°
                                                           x 10
                                                               6**
                                                                                 i l«i»      0.02
                                             Avir?ood."'"'"' """"^ "'-""^ »"»•—

                                            Maximum - s,um ,,| Wjxllttlllll ri.j>oi,uij vitflu.^
                                              food.  In tomhinaliu,, will,  ty,.|Ldl
                                              conb-uui|>t Ion

                                            Average -  real...,tU  ,,m,er  limit  (ol
                                              concentration^ I,, di Inking water.
 I
Ui
         Viaoi,!,  l,,uaihl,,g ambient aii
          Imloo, contact  (uxuo.cd tu ,.laatlcs)
        IUIAI
          ujial lonal  Situation
                uantity  blood rL.cl
                      hlgl, fat diet
                                                     very
                                                           10
                                                      2 x  1(1
                                                    very  small
                                                             4***
   Ulli.ilat inn
   Inlialatlon

   Inhalation
•s: f
   large

  large
                                                  »"t>:i
                                                                                              14-6011  (Total)
0.7-2. 1



 11.2
                      Based on
                                     ed  ai,  .uun.to.ing data.
                                          Meauurement  of uHf in air over  tiled ro
                                            Absuue  b.nue ,i.
                                                                                                                       u 4-bJ  mill.-, .,1
                                                                                                                                        1,1,
                                                                                                                  AM*""«e a =>-'  I  blood «ol,.uij. ailj
                                                                                                                    1.5 wg Dlilll'/lOl) ml.
                                                                                                                 IHet coi»,,o«td at UK tat  a^uiued  a
                                                                                                                   maximum of i(, IU(./KI,            '

-------
 7.3  THE  CARCINOGENICITY OF DEHP

     The  preliminary  results  from  the NCI  study  of DEHP were  described
 in Chapter 5.0.  For  extrapolation purposes,  the data  that  demonstrates
 increased hepatocellular carcinomas in both male and female mice were
 selected.  These data are listed in Table  7-2.   Similar carcinomas
 were observed in rats, but the implied dose-response relationships  were
 much less severe.

     The  first step in extrapolating the carcinogenic  effects  of DEHP
 to humans was to calculate the equivalent  human  dose rate corresponding
 to the experimental treatment.  The approach  recommended by the  U.S.  EPA
 1979b), which normalizes the dose  rate according  to body surface area
 was followed.  This approach is conservative  in  that it results  in  a.
 lower equivalent human dose than would be  obtained from simple multipli-
 cation of animal dose rate (mb/kg/day) by  human body weight.  Whether
 surface area or body weight is a. more appropriate normalization  factor
 is still open to debate.   The former method yields a dose rate approxi-
 mately 6  times lower  for rats, and approximately 14 times lower  for
 mice.  Thus, this method introduces into the  risk estimates an addi-
 tional uncertainty of roughly an order of magnitude on the  conservative
 side.

     The  calculation  of a human equivalent dose was performed using the
 following formula:
                                                          (2/3
                                            human weight
                                            animal weighty

     The  three dose-response models used to extrapolate human risk  were
 the linear "one-hit"  model, the log-probit model, and  the multistage
 model.  The latter is actually a generalization  of the one-hit model,  in
which the hazard rate was permitted to be a quadratic rather than a
 linear function of the dose.   All of these models are well known in the
 literature,  and a theoretical discussion may be found in Arthur  D.  Little
 (1980).  The one-hit models assume that the probability of a carcinogenic
 response is described by

             P (response at dose X) - 1 -e~h(x)

 where h(x) is the "hazard rata" function.  The log-probit model  assumes
 that human susceptibility varies with dose, according  to a  log-normal
 distribution.  Due to their differing assumptions, these dose-response
 models usually give widely differing results when effects data are  extra-
 polated from high laboratory doses to the  low doses typical of environ-
 mental exposure.

     For  the linear extrapolation, we solved  for  the coefficient 3  in Che
 following equation:

-------
             TABLE  7-2.  CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS OF DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL)

                         PHTHALATE  IN B6C3F1 MICE
                                Human Equivalent                      -
                Dosage fag/kg 1       Cme/dav)       o       *           Excess over
                    	i-^L  	img/dayj	  Response*  Percent  Controls <"')

 -Male Mice              Q                n                                      ~
                        U                0           9/50        13

                    3000             1300          14/43        79          u


                    6000             3600          19/50        38          2Q
 Female Mice
0
3000
6000
0
1800
3600
0/50
7/50
17/50
0
14
34


34
*Hepatocellular carcinoma.
Source:   NTP (1980).

-------
giving
     3 =   log
             *
         x    e  1 - P(X)

where ?(0) is the control group response.

     For example, from the low dose male mice, we find an estimate

         1           i"    1 - -18
     3 * 1800 mg/day  "*  X ' '29   " 8xl0"' ?er *«/d^

     It was found that the female mouse data indicated a higher  rate  of
excess cancer incidence, yielding a conservative estimate of 3 = 10"^,
roughly.  The inferred human per capita risk at low dose levels  may then
be found simply by multiplying the coefficient B by the dose in  tag/day.

          Prob. of response s B (dose)

     The expected incidence of cancer in a given population may -then  be
found by multiplying the probability of response times the size  of the
population.
                                        •
     For the log-probit extrapolation, we solved the "probit" intercept
A in the following equation:

          Prob. of response *  $   A 4- log-- (dose)

where $ is the cumulative normal distribution function.

     This equation makes the usual assumption that the log-probit dose-
response curve has unit slope with respect to the log-dose.  Again, the
more conservative results for female mice were utilized to estimate A,
though in this case the difference was less important.  Using tables  of
the standard normal distribution, we find that A is approximately equal
to -4.0.  This value may then be used to find the probability of a
response at various dose levels from the above equation.

     The multi-stage model, using a quadratic hazard rate function

          h(x) - ax2 + bx + C,

was fit to both the male and female mouse data combined.  To estimate
the parameters a, b, and c, we used a maximum likelihood method  aided
by a computer program, which performed a heuristic search for the best
fit.  It was found that the parameter b dominated for small values of
the dose x, so that the dose-response function was essentially linear
in the low-dose region.

     The U.S.  EPA Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPTS) applied
Che linear one-hit aoael co data from the same studies, but used different
assumptions as to carcinogenic response (Personal communication, Mike Slimak,

-------
   Monitoring and Data
                                               FPA>   r

                                   v
   tions of these finding far^n7 r    ™Sp*Ct C° the Possible implica-
   te, of agreement l*g pa^ogis s* ordlaf13,31^"011 ariS6S ?r°m a
   fying hepatic lesions as benign or malL^S     ? Crit6ria f°r classi-
   was based on the combined Scf dene e of Sr   aeOplasia-  The OPTS estimate
   nodules; the ADL estimate was ba       =arcin°mas and P«-aeoplastic
   carcinomas  only.   Based
             B - 9.1 x 10"3 per mg/kg/day


               3 1.3 x 10"4 per mg/day,

   assuming a  human  mass of 70  kg.
                                    st,    *our

  risk.           Pemit S °°re ««««ta or definitive assessment of human
   excess  cancers/year,  fer
 Che

 population size, however   akes
 general population, the niSs?
 exposure to DEHP in the dift
 and,processin8, and ^'
Monitoring data on which exoosur*
were based are limited?  eXP°SUre
are
                                                         acs.  The srnal!

                                                          Io"'  In tha
                                                                with
                                             r                      .
                                             for air and drinking water
            RISKS ASSOCIATED WTT* OTH£R
 laboratory,  animals  are
    level
          °'4 3 ^HP/kg
Chapter 5.0.  Note that the
genicity) reported for the
for =eratogenicity in mic!
reported to be 0.07 3/k"   estcur ar
and ,ice as a result^of %W".;»C S 5. S f ^ Jp
reported effects Cave's -'or -KQ   •     .     g DEHP/kS-   -^st or che
10 i/kg of body weigh"     "   °"er ?nt^iacas range  from I ?/kg ,0

-------
                        TABLE 7-3.  PER CAPITA LIFETIME CARCINOGENIC RISK TO HUMANS DUE TO

                                    DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 1NGESTION AT VARIOUS EXPOSURE

                                    LEVELS ESTIMATED BY USE OF FOUR EXTRAPOLATION MODELS*
       Ji*l cumulation Model
                             	Excess Cancer Risk at Exposure Level (mR/day)a

                              0.01            0.1             1             10
                                                              100
       Linear model
                            1 x 10~6       1 x 10 5
                              1 x 10
                                                                                1 x 10
                                                                                      -3
                                                                                        1 x 10
                                                                  -2
       Log-1> rob it model
                            off scale
               3 x 10
                                                        -7
               3 x 10
                                                                -5
               1 x 10
                                                   -3
                                                                                        2 x 10
                                                   -2
i
Ou
Mulii-utage model
5 x 10"7
5 x 10
                                                        -6
5 x 10
                                                                -5
5 x 10
                                                            5 x 10
       OPTS linear
                          1.3 x 10 6     1.3 x 10 5     1.3 x 10 4     1.3 x 10 3     1.3 x 10~2
        Probably conservative,  i.e.,  tending to overestimate risk.

-------
               water

     lillialaliuii

        uiliaii

        mi a I
                               Average
                               Exposure   1'opulaUon
                                             Size
0.02


0.006

0.00006
    Linear
    One-lii t
                                          220.6xl0       3xlO
                                                             ~5
2x10
    -6
            165.6x10''      6x10

             55.Jxl06      6x10"
    -7
                  Ki.sk  liitimate.l (l.y m.rf..i
off  scale



off  scale

off  scale
                                                                   Multi-
                                    1x10
                                    3x10
                                        -7
                                                                                             JxlO
                                                                                                 -9
                                                                                     OI'TS
                                                                                    Linear
                                                                                                              4x10
                                                      1x10
                                                         -6
                                                     tixlO

                                                     a* 10
                                                         -1
                                                                                                    Kai»j;e  of
                                                                                                    E.st im.iled
                                                                                                       I 1-1 10

                                                                                                        J-10
                                                                                                                                   . 002- . 006
 ^1-45        4.5x10^

0.7-2.1       1.9xU)4
                                                        '      -4xlO~3    4x10 3-
                                                                          1x10 5-lxlO
                                   lxlO~3-2xllf
                                                                                                              9x10
                                                                           0.6-6

                                                                         0.00 1-0. O8
j-.ol-.il.ly ,:o,,sUrvatJ»e. i.e. tuilj,IlK  to overstate risk

-------
                    TABLE 7-5.  EFFECTS OF PHTHALATE ESTERS ON LABORATORY ANIMALS
Adverse Effects
DEHP
Testicular Atrophy
Embryo toxicity
Teratogenesis
Oral LDjQ
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
plus Neoplastic Modules
Hepacocellular Carcinoma
plus Adenoma
DMP
Chronic Nephritis
Embryotoxicicy
Oral LD.0
PEP
Teracogenesis
Oral LD-0
Lowest Lethal Dose
DBF
Taracogenesis
Oral LD.0
Testicular injury
DROP
Oral LD-,
BBP
Periportal Hepatitis
Carcinogsnicity
Species
Mouse
Rat
Mouse
Mouse
Rat
Rat
Mouse
Rat
Chick/Embryo
Rat
Rac
Rabbit
Human
Mouse
Rac
Rac
Mouse
Mouse
Mouse
Lowes c Reported
Effects Levels
0.72
0.6
0.83
0.4
31.0
0.6
0.36
4.0*
0.005/egg
8.2
1.9
1
0.5
2.1
8-10
2
> 13
0.5
-
'> Incidence
14
90
100
-
50
26
52
_
100
50
81
50
-
-
50
-
50
-
-
Mo Apparent
Effects Levels
S/kjj
0.36
0.3
-
0.07 "
-
-
-
-.2.0
-
-
_
-
-
0.8
-
-
-
-
1.4
T
 Based on a JOO  g  rat  sating  30  g/kg  body weight
 containing 3%  DM?.
                                          7-10

-------
                                                                  r
                                r  ~
   .-«1"S;,.';::,r,;';™'f S.T "•"." ;"-
  or other «i«r«T'h^ i"88"* ^ Crlteria*
  nay need to be re-exaSnld         Phthalate esters, specifically DEHP,
  7-5   RISK TO BIOTA
                       ^^
                                               ^-1^--
 low as 940 ug/1 and 3 ug, respeSi^ely  ad £?** "  concentr^ions as

 for more sensitive specif (u!S  Sfl^jf "!! °^  " 10WSr levels

 available,  concentrations of the phtha!!tes a^e^i^  * "^ °f the d
 were usually greater than lOOn ,%/i      .   affecting  aquatic organisms

 100,000  ug/i (see SectiS 52?  8^ r"8"8 ^ 19°° U8/1 to over

 to affectaquatic organisJ   3* ug %  SSZL*?***^0* °f °EHP f°und
 by 60% (Sanders et al.  1973    Si i^ "2d  reProd^tion in Daphnia


                  which ^-                          8       of
                                  Theef
 are very close to  the detection liJt  for DEHp C0?"nt5ations <* 3 ug/l
 chemical vas measured and detected  \r ,  ??     Thererore, wherever the

 on these organisms.  However  thl woo^f f?""061*117  haVe an effect
 confirmed,  since this level Is rel^f       ** 3t  3 Ug/1 should **
observed  effects.               relatively low compared with other
                                               DBF of 100 ug/1 is  roc


reported a -.nificanr^errr:^:^;^0:!^:;.^ riv«
        -or the
                                            ions affecting fish vere

-------
TABLE  7-6.  CALCULATED ALLOWABLE DAILY  INTAKE AND RECOMMENDED
            WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR  PHTHALATE ESTERS
Phthalata

DMP
DEP
DBP
DEEP
ADI1
(mg/day)
700.0
438.0
12.6
42.0
Recommended Criteria
(mg/1)
160
60
5
10
 For 70 kg person with a safety factor of 100 from a
 no-effect dose.
2
 Based on a consumption of 2 I/day of drinking water
 and a consumption of 18.7 g of fish assuming
 various bioaccumulation factors.
Source:   U.S.  EPA (1980).

-------
                                     rno
          It  is  difficult  to  dateine whL  COTmn°nly deteCted in the
   in  Daphnia would  have on  the  h^hT      imPaCt reproduccive impa
   th.  indirect  risk oT"Sorta"              ' ^     °n ^   Thus»
  -contact with,
                                                       ilaole
                   s
  because of the insuft-ient data ^tho T*^ °^«±s*s is "t possible
  available that present levels of^E^in^" ^^ fr°m the data
  to some invertebrates.  ££ appearf t  h ^h^envirotm^t may pose a risk

  Phthalates and the  most  ubiquitous  in thJ    ," ^^ persistant of the
  The effects data  for  DEHP  do   not  JL£j wvlroj»eat (see Section 4.2).

  Phthalates   Therefore  the other phthalatM'rS  ^ th°Se f°r °ther
  because  of the lack of effects  StS  n™f K?  (     " nOt  included
  aquatic  organisms than DEH?        }  Pr°bab1^  P°se  1««  of a  risk to
          sanothefispcish                             °
 for their susceptibility to nJthlll,     n0t been Studied «t«nslv«l7

 available does Sot indicate ?hat JhU " *'"•  ^ Umited ^f°^tion
 Phthalates than warm water fxsh   Sgn \  ^^ Sensiti^ to any of the

 probable that in cold water if is !f  ?   Ver7 lw solubility; it is

 conditions,  which ar'e S^JJ c'onS?^ 25 if1^^ -d- laboratory

 a cold water system,  therefore  mav  h-  ^-     S'     7 effects of

 Monitoring data of  hthalatrconc^r^tions^inl.?
 extensive enough to  support  speculation  S.
                                       dK
-bra fish and guppies  se  Section Tl? ^r3"'6 SffeCtS °f DEH? on
of 50 ug/kg and 100 ug/kg sliStlv r ^  ^ Concentrations in the food

and guppxes, respectively'.  GuppiL ^^1^°^^ ** Z&^ £±sh
braces (Collins 1959).       ^PP^es teed primarily on aquatic inverts
        representin    ,        ,                        1* *"
                claared by flsh                                      ln
The high tissue concentrations reported for fish in Ser-'nn '  .
co contradict this,   ^ost of -HP ^,~   i'ut.I--sn ^-n bection u.l appear

                          ""°   °     ^ ir3 T'e
                           of  -HP     ,~       .

 entire bodv.  One soec     -""°   °           r3  T'eaSUrad  f°r
                                  T-13

-------
food sources, therefore, may have little effect on aquatic  organisms
that eat them.  Only speculations can be made at  this point until  further
investigation is conducted in this area.

     Phthalates, at least DBF and DNOP, do not appear to pose an acute
risk to birds through ingestion of contaminated food because of the
high concentrations required to produce acute effects (see  Section 6.1).
}To effects information was available for other phthalates.   The highest
concentration of any phthalace reported in water or biota (and assuming
it to be a potential food source) was 7.2 tag/kg (see Section 6.2).  It
is unlikely that concentrations of these two phthalates are  high enough
in the environment to cause acute effects.   Because DEHP is  abundant in
the environment and appears to be the most slowly metabolized of the
phthalates, an assessment of its risk requires data on the effects on
avian species.  Also,  phthalates may have subacute effects on birds at
lower concentrations that could conceivably be attained through biocon-
centration.  Further investigations on the acute effects of other
phthalates and subacute effects are required to determine realistically
the risk phthalates pose to birds.

-------
                                8.0   REFERENCES
  Anonymous, 1978a.   Plasticizers.   Plastics  World 5:60-6!.
  Beeler,  A.D.  and D.C.
  Encyclopedia  1977-78,
 1978! FS^ieS                               1" "
                        in
                                        Od            -   1976-
 (DEHP) in mice and a model ecosystem   ?  dl:2-eth£lhe*n phthalate
 on Pharomcol., Urbana, U1.PP  225-35            th  Internat'
  ~- — —-*-»••*-^&iACi  wcxcnnzscnsr   Zs ** t* T1 h    r  t.        ""       osi sinwi^TiCunff
 103:413-24,  as  cited  in  LeFauxI  R?1963       '  ^^SUCh- Forsch'

 Bower  R :<. , S. Habenaan and  ?.D. Mint on   1970   -
 Che cmck embryo caused  bv esters of  nhrhal      -/   C°genlc "fect3 on
 Ther.  171:314-24.         '            ?nchalic acid.   J.  Pharmacol.  S:cp.

3roxvn, 3.,  ;<.a. Suttervorth,  I.?. Qaun^   ?  r
-978.   Short-cerm oral "ox-'c-'tv =r  •  "•    ^^asso  and 5.D.  Gangolli.
?ood Cosaet. Toxicol.  16:i*5-^       °r  aiech^i ?hthalate  in  the rat.
                                 3-1

-------
 Brownlee,  B.  and W.M. J. • Strachan.   1977.   Distribution of some ogranic
 compounds  in  the receiving  waters  of  a kraft pulp and oaper mill
 J.  Fish. Res.  Board  Can.  34:830.

 Cagianut,  B.   1954.  Keratitis  erosiva und  nephritis  toxica nach
 einnahme von dibutylphchalata.  Schweiz . Med. Wschr.  34:1242  as cited
 in Williams, 1973.
        n                              o7292
Regulations and Standards, U.S. Snvironmental Protect"; Jgency
Wasnington, D.C.                                 <•=«- — un ,-igenc/,

GARB,  1976.  Adoption of  a  System  for  the  Classification of  Organic
Compounds  According  to Photochemical Reactivity^   California Air
Resources  Board Staff Report 73-3-4.   Appendix V.


Carpenter, D. ,  C.S.  Weil  and H.F.  Smyth, Jr.  1953.   Chronic oral toxi-
city of di(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate for rats, guinea pigs and dogs.
AMA Arch.  Ind.  Hyg.  Occup.  Med. 8:219-26.

Cater, B.R. , M.W. Cook, S.D. Gangolli  and  P. Grasso.  1977.   Studies on
dibutyl phthalate-induced testicular atrophy in  the rat:   Effect on
zinc metabolism.  Toxicol.  Appl. Pharmacol. 41:609-18.

Chambon, P., M. Riotte, iM.  Davdon,  R.  Chambon-Mougenot, and  J.  Bringuier.
1971.  Metabolism of dibutyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate in the rat.
C. R.  Acad. Sci. Series D 273(22) :2165-2168.

Chiou, C.T., V.H. Freed, D.W.  Schmedding,  and R.L. Kohnert.   1977.
Partition  coefficient and bioaccumulation  of selected organic chemicals.
Environ. Sci. Tech.  11:475.

Chris tens en, D., J.  Neergaard, B.  Nielsen, V. Faurby, and  O.F.  Nielsen.
1976.  The release of plasticizers  from PVC.  Proc. Int. 6th Congr.
Pharmacol. 6:191.

Cifrulak,  S.D.  1969.  Spectroscopic evidence of phthalates  in  soil
organic matter.  Soil Sci.  107:63,  as  cited in Mathur, 1974.

Collins, H.H. , Jr.   1959.   Complete Field  Guide  to American  Wildlife.
Harper and Row Publishers,  New York.

Corcoran,  E.  1973.  Gas chromatographic detection of phthalate  acid
esters.  Env. Health Perspect. 3:13.

County of  San Diego.  1978a-  The  San  Diego Revised Regional Air Quality
Strategy:  California State Implementation Plan  Submittal.   A report
from the San Diego Air Pollution Control District:  and Comprehensive
Planning Organization.

Daniel, J.W.  1973.  Toxicity and  metabolism of  phthaiate  esters.   Clin.
Toxicol. 130:257-03.

-------
   Daniel, J.W. and H. Bratt
                at diz
  Environ. Sci  Tech. 9()
                                                                 Camber.
  Fayz,  S.,  R.  Herbert,  and A.M
                 ohloride
                                   PhthaUte
                                                             survey,
 Fishfaein, L. and P W
         of tta
Fukuhara, M. and E. Takafaacaka   1977   c,. A-
induced by diecary administration o : d±('  ^^ ^ 1±Ver «largement
J. Toxicol. Sci. 2(l):U-23          dx(2-echylhexyl) phchalace  (DEHP) .

Garvin, P.J.,  j.G.  Schmidt and R.?.  Wallin
or plasma solucions of di-2-arhylhexvl
in racs.   Toxicol.  Appl.
                                                      c  -
                                                        Sty
                                       (1) :
                                                             — -ly
Garvin, ?.J., >LE. Lavandowski and R.?  Val^'n   TQ-SK   -
evaluation of piasma-soluole axt-ac-s or n T     t  -      A tarac°^gic
Phanaacologisc 18-32^   as MH    ^    ?ol:rviaylchlorice olascics.
          3 au ioo^_, as -_caa in ihomas ec ai. ,  1973.
                                  3-3

-------
Giam, C.S., H.S. Chan, G.S. Neff,  and  E.L. Atlas.   1978.   Phthalate
ester plasticizers:  a new class of marine pollutant.   Science,  199:419-21.

Gleibenaan, S.E.,  S.N. Bolandova,  O.Y. Kemirits  and L.N.  Merenkova.
1975.  Toxicology  of the repellent phenoxyacetic acid  n,  n-diethylamide
(P-203) and its mixtures with dimethyl phthalate.   Med.  Parazitol.
Parazit. Bolezni.  44(6):693-98, as cited  in CA 084/116586J and  HEEP
77/00625.

Gosselin, R.E., H.C. Hodge, R.P. Smith, and M.S.  Gleason,  ads.   1976.
Clinical Toxicology of Commercial  Products, 4th  edition.   The Williams
and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Maryland.

Graham, P.R.  1973.  Phthalata esters:  why and  how are  they used.
Env. Health Persp. 3:3-12.

Gray, T., Jr., K.R. Butterworth, I.F.  Gaunt, P.  Grasso and S.D.  Gangolli.
1977.  Short-term  toxicity study of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate  in rats.
Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 15(5):389-400.

Gross, F.C. and J.A. Colony.  1973.  The ubiquitous  nature and objec-
tionable characteristics of phthalate  esters in  aerospace  technology.
Environ. Health Persp.  4(3):37-43.

Habenaan, S.,  W.L. Guess, D.F. Rowan,  R.O. Bowman and R.K.  Bower.   1968.
Effects of plastics and their additives on human serum proteins, anti-
bodies, and developing chick embryos.  SPE (Soc. Plastics  Eng.)  J.
.24:62-9.

Hamano, Y., A. Kuwano,  K. Inoue, Y. Oda, H. Hamamoto, B. Mitsuda and
N. Kumita.   1977.   Studies on toxicity of phthalic  acid esters.  Part I.
Teratogenic effects in mice when administered orally.  Osaka-furitsu
Koshu Eisei Kenkyusho Kenkyu Hokoku, Shokukin Eisei  Hen. 8:2933, as
cited in CA 089/001257P.

Hansch, C., J.E. Quillan, and J.L. Lawrence.   1968.  The linear  free-
energy relationship between coefficients and the aqueous solubility of
organic liquids.  J. Org. Chem.  33:347-350.

Harris, R.S.,  H.C. Hodge, E.A. Maynard, and H.H.  Blanchet, Jr.   1956.
Chronic oral toxicity of 2-ethylhexyl phthalate in  rats and dogs.   AMA
Arch Industr.  Health 13:259.

Harris, V.T. and P.H. Eschmeyer.   1974.  Sport Fishery and Wildlife
Research 1972.  Bureau of Sport  Fisheries and Wildlife, Fish and
Wildlife Service,  U.S.  Department  of the Interior.

Heath, R.G., J.W.  Spann,  S.S.  Hill, and J.F.  Kraitzer.   1972.  Compara-
tive dietary coxicities of pesticides  do birds.   Spec.  Sci. Report:  NTo.
152.  U.S.D.I.,  Washington, D.C.

-------
 catheters and blood products.  New England J. Med. ^92-381-6
Jacobson, M.S., L.N. Button, W.A. Watson, B.I  Barwick
                               -  Button'

                                3-5

-------
 Jaeger,  R.J.  and R.J.  Rubin.   1970.   Plasticizers from plastic devices
 extraction metabolism, and accumulation by biological systems.  Sci
 170:460.

 Johnson,  B.T.  and W.  Lulves.   1975.   Biodegradation of di-n-butyl
 phthalate and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate in freshwater hvdrosoil.  J. Fish
 Res.  Board Can.  32(3):333.

 Johnson,  B. _§_t al.   1974.   Dynamics  of phthalic acid esters in aquatic
 organisms in  I.E.  Suffed   (ed.)  Fata of Pollutants  in Air and Water
 Environments.   Part  2.  New York,  NY:   Wiley  Intersciance Publishers.

 Jones, A.E.,  R.H.  Kara, J.T.  Groves,  and E.A.  Napier.   1975.   Phthalata
 ester  toxicity in  human cell  cultures.   Toxicol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.
 31:283-89.

 Julin, A.   1975.   Personal  communication as cited in Johnson  et al
 (1974).                                -                       	

 Jungclaus, G.A., V. Lopez-Avila, and R.A.  Hites.  1978.   Organic com-
 pounds in an industrial wastewater:  a  case study of their environ-
 mental impact.  Environ. Sci. Technol.  12(1).-38.

 Kaneshima, H., T. Yamaguchi,  T. Okui and M. Naitoh.   1978.  Studies on
 the effects of phthalate esters on the  biological system.   Part 2.   In
 vitro  metabolism and .biliary excretion of phthalate esters in rats.
 Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol'. 19(4) :502-09.

 Karickhoff, S.W., D.S. Brown, and T.A.  Scott.   1979.  Water Research
 (in press).                                                        ~~

 Kasuya, M.  1974.  Toxicity of phthalate esters to nervous  tissue  in
 culture.   Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 12(2):167-72.

 Kasuya, M.  1976.  Toxicity of phthalate esters to tissue  cultures.
 Proc. Internat. Congr. Pharmacol. 6th,  6:215-24.

 Kitanaka, E., Y. Sakagami, T.  Shimada,  and M.  loku.   1977.  Studies on
 absorption, distribution,  and extraction of phthalates.  J.SCC. J.
 ll(l):48-54, as cited in CA 089/071760W.

Lake, 3.G., J.C. Phillips, J.C. Linnell, and S.D. Gangolli.   1977.
The in vitro hydrolysis of some phthalate diesters by hepatic  and
 intestinal preparations from various species.   Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.
 39(2):239-48b.

Lake, 3.G., P.G. Brantom,  S.D. Gangoili, K.R.  Butterworth,  and  ?. Grasso.
 1976.  Studies on the effects  of orally administered di(2-ethylhexyi)
 phthalate in the ferret.   Toxicol.  6(3):341-56.

Lake, 3.G., S.D. Gangoili.  ?.  Grasso, and A.G. Lloyd.  1973.   Studies
on cne hepatic affects of  orally administered  di(2-etnylhexyl)  phthalate
 in che rat.  Toxico.  Aopl.  Pharmacol. 32:355-67.
                                   3-0

-------
   Laughlin  R.B.,  Jr.,  j.M.  Meff,  and C.S.  Giam.  1977.  Effects of


             '      !°llMa"                                   -
       A.C.   !979.
Ind.  Hygiene 6:231.
                                                       
-------
 Hathur,  S.   1974.   Phchalate esters  in the environment:   pollutants or
 natural  products?   J.  Environ.  Quality 3(3):189.
           *
 Mayer, F.L.   1976.   Residue  dynamics of di(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate in
 fathead  minnows  (Plmeohales  promelas).   J.  Fish.  Res.  Board Can.
 33:2610.

 Mayer, F.L.,  Jr., and  H.O. Sanders.   1973.   Toxicology of phchalic acid
 asters in aquatic organisms.  Environ.  Health  Parspect.  3:153.

 Mayer, F.L.,  Jr., D.L.  Stalling  and  J.L.  Johnson.   1972.   Phthalate
 esters as environmental contaminants.   Nature  238:411.

 Mehrle, P.M.  and F.L. Mayer.  1976.  Di(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate:
 residue dynamics and biological  effects  in  rainbow  trout  and  fathead
 minnows,  pp.  519-24.  In Trace substances in environmental  health.
 Univ. of Missouri Press, Columbus, Mo.

 Mes, J.,  D.E. Coffin and D.S. Campbell.  1974.  Dibutyl and di(2-ethyl-
 hexyl) phthalate in human adipose tissue.   Bull. Environ. Contam.
 Toxicol.  12(6):721-25.

 Mes, J. and D.S. Campbell.  1976.  Extraction efficiency  of polychlori-
 nated biphenyl, organochlorine pesticides and phthalate esters from
 human adipose tissue.   Bull.  Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 16(1):53-60.

 Metcalf,  R.L., G.M.  Booth, C.K.  Schuth, D.J. Hansen and P. Lu.  1973.
 Uptake and fate of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in aquatic  organisms  and
 in a model ecosystem.   Environ.  Health Perspect. 3:27-34.

 Milkov, L.E., M.V.. Aldyreva,  T.B. Popova, K.A. Lopukhova, Yu. L.
Makerenko,  L.M. Malyar  and T.K.  Shakhova.   1973.  Health  status of
workers exposed to phthalate plasticizers in the manufacture of artifi-
 cial leather and films based on PVC resins.  Environ. Health Perspect.
 4(3):175-78.

Moody, D.E.  and J.K. Reddy.   1978.  Hepatic peroxisome (microbody)
 proliferation in rats fed plasticizers and  related compounds.  Toxicol.
Appl. Pharmacol. 45(2):497-504.

Morita, M.,  H. Nakamura, and S.  Mimura.  1974.  Phthalic  acid esters in
water.  Water Res. 8:781.

Morton, S.J. and R.J. Rubin.   1979.   Effects of dietary di(2-ethylhexyl)
 phthalate (DEHP), and its primary metabolites, mono(2-ethyIhexyl)
 phthalate (MEHP) and 2-ethyihexanol (2-EH)  on hepatic lipid metabolism.
 18th Annual Meeting, 3oc. of Toxicol., Mew Orleans, Louisiana,
       .1-15, 1979, Abstract  249.
                                   3-3

-------
   heSirohthSC^OSynPrS8raia (NTP)-  C«cinogenesis
   S,   P5thalate-   Draft"  ^search Triangle Park,
   ^escing rrogram,  National Toxicoloev Prn^-ra™  TT c
   «     ^                     • •«•• *v W .feW £ J i •twltid.Bw U « J
   Human  Services;  1980.   DHAS km^a^«, Number 81.177^
  Nagasaki, H., S.  Tomii, T. M
  1974.   Chronic toxicity of d:
  mice.   J. Nara. Med.  Assoc.
                         preliminary
  Neeley, W.B.   1978.  A
  exposure to be expected  from
  aquatic ecosystem.  Intern. J
 Neergaard, J. , 3. Nielsen,  V.
 1971.  Plasticizers in  PVC  an
 dialysis unit.  Scand.  J. Uro
  Nisbet, I.c.T.  and A.F. SarofU
  of PC3s in the  environment.

  Ogner,  G.  and M.  Schnitzer.
  dialkyl phthalate complexes a
  170:317-18.   .
 Ohyama,  T.   1977.   Effects of ,
 dehydrogenase  and  other enzynu;s
 /. n/o\.^ff«/-j                **
 40(2):355-64.

 Oishi, S. and K. Hiraga.   1975
 gonadal function in male  rats

Oishi, S. and K. Hiraga.   1980
acid monoesters:  effects of
Toxicol.  15:197-202.
                                                               Health and
                                ga,  K.  Hirao, Y.   Shinohara and N. Ito
                                octyl phthalate (DOP) in male rats and'
                                5 (6):649-54.
    . assessment  of  the  environmental
the addition of a chemical  to  a simulated
  of Environ. Studies  (in press)  '
 Faurby, D.H. Christensen and O.F. Nielsen.
  the occurrence of hepatitis in a hemo-
1.  Nephrol. 5:141-45.

_     1972.   Rates and routes of transport
•uviron. Health Perspect. .1:21-38.
                               .970.  Humic substances:  fulvic  acid-
                               •d their role in pollution.   Science
                                Phthalate esters  on glucose 6-phosphate
                                sin  vitro.   Toxicol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.


                                •  Effect  of  phthalic  acid  esters  on
                                 Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  21:65-67.

                                  Testicular atrophy  induced by phthalic
                                -nc and testosterone concentrations.
                                                    endocrinological
       phthalate  (DEEP).   I.     fic    of d«? dminiscerin§ bi3(2-ethvl
of DEHP on the gonadal  function  of "ale  ra's7
Res. Lab. Public Health 26(2) .•127-30%^

°nda, H. , H.  Kodama, jr. Yamada and H  Ota    197fi
ester on reproductive oerformance in rat  r*  II   <
     31(4):507-12, as ci:ad"n CA 086/134070^
                                                   *ff
                                                      eCt °f
                                   3-9

-------
 •Ota, H., H. Onda, H.  Kodama  and  N.  Yamada.   1974.'  Histopathological
 studies on  the  effect  of  phthalic acid  esters  on  the biological system
 of mice.  Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 29(5) :519-24, as  cited in
 CA 083/054131S.

 Otake, T. ,  S. Akasaka, Y. Murata, H. Uda and T. Kitaura.   1977.   The
 effect of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on male  mice.   I.   Osaka-
 furitsu koshu eisei kenkyusho kenkyu hokuku.   Koshu  Eisei  Hen  15-129-38
 as cited in CA  39/123/a.

 Patty, F.A. (ed.).  1963.  Aromatic and cyclic dicarboxylic ac
-------
      ,  S.C.  and X.  Shecrraod.   i
      edition,  McGr.v-HiU Book
 Cosmet. loxico!. 15(ll
                                                         '«« »« "quids.
                                                 •   1977-
                                            concents of the r«.  Food
       in vinyl pstic

Rubin, R.J. and P.P. Mair
England J.  Med. 238:915
                             iq??   ui - * •  •
                                    Plasticxzers in human
                                                           tissues.  New
Rubin, R.J. , w. Kozumfao and R. Kroll    T070
a series of phthalic acid esters   Lii
and diethyl esters in IA 100 ,™ >' ^ ^
Toxicol., New Orleans, Louisiana, J £3"

Rutter, H.A.   1973.  Toxicology of pia.tic devices
                                                A
                                                  " muta8enic ^say of

                                                        v  '"' dimethyl
                                                        Meeting Soc'
                                                            contact



Schulz, C.O., R.J. Rubin and G.M. Hutchins   1975
                               3-11

-------
 Schumacher,  J.N.,  C.R.  Green,  F.W.  Best  and  M.P.  Newell.   1977.  Smoke
 composition.  An  extensive  investigation of  the water-soluble portion
 of  cigarette smoke.   J. Agric.  Food Cham.  25(2) :310.

 Seth, P.K. ,  S.P.  Srivastava, O.K. Agarwal  and  S.V.  Chandra.   1976.
 Effect  of  di(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalata (DEHP)  on rat  gonads.   Environ.
 Res.  12 (2): 131-38.

 Shaffer, C.3., C.P. Carpenter  and H.F. Smyth,  Jr.   1945.  Acute and sub
 acute toxicity of  di(2-ethylhexyi)  phthalata with nota  upon  its metabo-
 lism.   J.  Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 27:130-35.

 Shibko, S.I.  and  H. Blumenthal.  1973.   Toxicology  of phthalic  acid
 esters  used  in food-packaging material.  Environ. Health  Perspect.  4(3):
Shiota, K. , M.J. Chou, and H. Nishimura.  1979.  Embryotoxic  effects  of
di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate  (DEHP) and di-n-butyl phthalate  (DBP)  in  mice.
Environ. Res. 22:245-53.

Simmons, V.F., K. Kauhanen and R.G. Tardiff.  1977.  Mutagenic activity
of chemicals identified in drinking water.  Dev. Toxicol. Environ.
Sci. 2:249-53.

Singh, A.R. , W.H. Lawrence and J. Autian.  1972.  Teratogenicity of
phthalate esters in rats.  J. Pharmacol.. Sci. 61:51-55.

Singh, A.R. , W.H. Lawrence and J. Autian.  1974.  Mutagenic and anti-
fertility sensitivities of mice to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)
and dimethoxyethyl phthalate (DMEP) .  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
29(1): 35-46.

Smith, C.C.  1953.   Toxicity of butylstearate, dibutyl-sebacate,
dibutyl-phthalate,  and methoxy ethyloeate.  Arch.  Ind. Hyg. Occup . Med.
April:  310ff ," as cited in Lefaux,  1963.

Smith, J.H. , W.R. Mabey,  N. Bohonos, B.R. Holt, S.S. Lee, T-W. Chou,
D.C. Bomberger and T.  Mill.  1977.   Environmental pathways of selected
chemicals in fresh water systems.  Part I:  Background and experimental
procedures.  SRI International Report to U.S. EPA,  EPA-600/7-77-113.

Sollman, I.  1957.   A manual of pharmacology.  U.S.A.:  tf.B. Saunders Co,

Southworth, G.R.  1979.  The role of volatilization in removing poly-
cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aquatic environments.  Bull, of
Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 21:507-14.
                                 3-12

-------

   Stanford Research Institute International (SRI>   797*   A  . j   r

   industrial data on candidate chemicals for testing   L 560/5 ?8°on2
   Washington,  DC:  Office of Toxic Subst^a*   n c  ^  ,   560/5-78-002.
   tion Agency.                      Substances,  U.S.  Environmental Protec-

Third ..nnua! Report t8 Con?rass - lesource Raco.ery «* »Mt.
                                 3-1.

-------
 Thomas,  G.H.   1973.   Quantitative determination and confirmation of
 identity of trace amounts of dialkyl phthalates in environmental samples.
 Environ.  Health Perspect.  3:23-28.


 Thomas,  J.A.,  P.R. Felice,  L.G.  Schein,  P.K.  Gupta and R.E.  McCafferty.
 1979.  Effects of monoethylhexyl phthalate  on pregnant rabbits and
 their  offspring.   18th Annual Meeting  Soc.  of Toxicol.,  New  Orleans,
 Louisiana,  p A33.

 Timofievskaya,  L.A.,  M.V. Aldyreva  and I.M.  Kazbekov.   1974.   Experi-
 mental research on the effect of phthalate  plasticizers  on the body.
 Gig. Sanit.  12:26-28, as  cited  in CA 082/107114K.

 Tomita,  I.,  et al.  1977.   Phthalic acid esters in various foodstuffs
 and biological materials.   Ecotoxicology and  Environmental Safety 1:275.

 U.S. Bureau of the Census.   1976.   County business patterns.

 U.S. Department of Agriculture.  1972.    Food  and nutrient  intake of
 individuals  in the United States.   Agricultural Research Survey,
 Household  food consumption  survey 1965-66.  Report No.  11.

 U.S. Department of Agriculture.   1973.   Food  consumption,  prices,  and
 expenditure.   Economics,  Statistics and  Cooperative Service,  supplement
 for 1976  to Agricultural  Economic Report No.  138.

U.S.  Department of Commerce.  1980.   Statistical abstract of  the United
States.  Washington, DC:   Bureau of the  Census.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  1974.  Enclosures with  letter
from M.J. Lewis to J.  Hesse.  Phthalates.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  1975.  Report to Congress,
preliminary assessment of suspected carcinogens in drinking water.
Office of Toxic Substances.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  197S.  In-depth studies on health
and'environmental impacts of selected water pollutants.  U.S.  EPA Contract
No. 68-01-4646.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  1979a.  STORET.  Washington, D.C.:
Monitoring and Data Support Division, Office of Water Planning and
Standards, U.S. EPA.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  1979b.   Guidelines and
methodology used in the preparation of  health affect assessment chapter
of the consent decree watar quality criteria.   Federal ?,egistar 44(52):
15641.
                                 3-14

-------
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency   1980   A K-
 criteria for phthalate esters.   S      -SO 0^
                                           8°-°67
                   aate esters.      ^O/S-SO 0     n.
  Regulations and Standards  U S  Fn, L.   /5 8°-°67-  Office of Wa
  Washington, D.C.                Environmental Protection Agency,
                                                           of  Water
                                   '  "68-1978.  Synthetic organic
          ««•    priorSinT
  report  to U.S. EPA, EPA-560/l!77-002
                                                           '  Inc"
Versar, Inc
       to
        Washington, D.C.
          (Uc-DEHP)
Appl. Pharmacol.  39:339-5
     Uveu in «.
                                                      Protection
                                                        »".  The
                                                       -2-ethylheXyl
                                            autoradiography.  Toxicol.
                                              •««•

                             3-1;

-------
Wilson, W.B., C.S. Giam, I.E. Goodwin, A. Aldrich, V.  Carpenter,  and
Y.C. Hrung.  1978.  The toxicity of phthalates  to  the  marine  dino-
flagellace Gymnodium Breve.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  20:149-54.

Woggon, H. and U. Koehler.  1967.  The testing  of  plastics consumer
goods.  Polarographic determination of fais(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and
study of its migration tendency.  Kunststoffe 57:583,  as cited  in
Peakall 1975.

Wolfe, JLL., W.C. Steen, and L.A. Burns.  1979.  Use of Linear  Free
Energy Relationships and an Evaluation Model for Phthalate Transoort
and Fate Estimations.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  Environ-
mental Research Laboratory draft manuscript.

Yagi, Y., K. Tutikawa, and N. Shimoi.   1976.  Teratogenicity  and
mutagenicity of phthalate ester.  Teratology 14:259-60.

Yamada, A.  1974.  Toxicity of phthalic acid esters and hepatoxicity of
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.  Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi.  15(3):147-52,
as cited in CA 083/054100Q.

Zitko, V.  1973.   Determination of phthalates in biological samples.
Internat. J.  Environ.  Anal. Chem. 2:241.
                                 3-16

-------
           APPENDIX A.   MATERIALS  BALANCE WORKSHEET
                       on.   All amounts are in 1000 kkgs.

Column (A) - The fraction of total U.S.  phthalate  production
             represented by the particular  ester.

       CB) - The amount  of  the  particular ester remaining in
             the United  States  after exports.

       (C)  - Transportation  loss  (calculated as 0.1% of the
             U.S. supply) assumed  to be lost directly to water.
          " fzl JrTi0n °f eaCh SSter consumed ^ three use
            categories:  non-plasticizer, PVC plasticizer
            other polymer plasticizer.         P^sticizer,

      (E) - The fraction of ester (within each use category)
            consumed in the production  of various  product
                                      catesories
      (G) - The amount of ester vaporized during compounding
            57 to :L  :v«;f (F))-  »
           JJ/i to axr, and 65% to water.
     (H) -
                              sites and  25z
                                              ed as
              7f
          3-9'  (H) x  (F) to aacount for vaporization !os3

     (-) - -Amount of astar remaining in che Varlou3 ,roduc
                          A-I

-------
                                                                                                lABl.t  A  I
                                                                                                              MAltKlAtS ttVI.ANCIi
tv/y (..
I'l.lt... lu
Liiti.1
I'rodu. -
I iun
f A|il.l I .1
u  s.
Supply
                         U  01

,-H
a
1
*/i
.-*
"o
o
(II)
164.6















55 4


J 0






7.5

4.0


?
•u
*
1
1 (

i^
c •»
S8
H ^

O.2















O.I




1
?• *
C 1*
*t O
g S
44 U
u
ss
1*. 9
(0)
N,,n fUslUlict
Other polymer* .05
PVC »la>lli.l«er 0.4

ullli liquid*




with air





5
1?
s
So'
six
£3
<«
-
I.O
uwlMln* pool O.OU
liners
jtartlea luwea O.01O
HMftllcal unea O.ll
flooring .226
weather »tr!ppl»£ .015
furniture .112
wall covering .040
auto upholbtry 4
ueat covers .112
apparel .100
food wrap .015
Jwlre I cable . 101
houbeware .018

Nuit-plu&r Ic I zer
Other polyiuuit) .15
I'VC pluallUzei .85

U.U1 Noii-nUatlcUer .05






0.01

0.004


-

Other polymer* .50




Nuu-plaiil Iclzer .05
Celulo*tUk .95
Non-pla*! Itlzer .10

Celulo*ttt-s .70
-
spurt goodtf i toy? .043 |
other PVC uaes .045
I.O
vinyl flooring .900
other PVC uaes .IOO
I.O

1.0

cunt act u/dlr ijrj* .6iS
iuw surface contact . 110

1.0
1.0
I.O

I.O












.015



.655





.110
















-
i
1



gi

m
-
«.4


5.6



IO4 2





49.1

U. J
42. J
4.}
0.4

1.5
II. 1
2.1
I.O

O.4
7.2
1.2

2. a
-
«H
C (^
t* *•<
a
*3
^•a
3|
of
• 1
> O
«;>
-
0.3


0.2



J |





1.5
1x1
wire
0.1
1.1
O.I
-

O.I
O.OOI
n.l
O.OI

-
0.2
-

n.l
-


4» '
M *O
33?
eijs
r.g
« M U
•325
1 ••'
KM N
(u)
-
0.02


0.02



0.03





O.02
..i. 1.4
t e.U.
0.02
O.OI
0.01
!

0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02

'?
O.O2
7

0.02
-




"•
ac
Js
(I)
-
0.4


0.2



7. 4





l.«
10.2
ha
11.4
0.4
ll.l
?

O.I
1 IKK

0.04

''
0.1
7

0 1
-


M
|

|
»< »-*
li
(j>
-
1.1


5.2



91. 7





45.*

1 6
40.7
4.2


sl
Is
3 i
:!
•1 A*
3°
JK «4
(H)




l.OOStowalur



U.001 1° tt'r





O.OOI^Io air
fc water
7
O.OOI to dlr
?
0.4 \fl.2 air

1. 1
0. 1

(1.9

0.4
6.7
1.2

2.6
-
O.2 water
7
O.OOiwater
0.001 air
O.(l»2xulr
water
•T-0.2 alr
0. 2 water
7
\0.2 »'f
(1.2 Wllt-
 II!
OK'
a.z
0 2
0 01
0 1
Trn












Hill



s
bur •
iitr

i.tif
ifNiif

-------
 (K) - Phthalate release rate (in percentage per year)
       ror each product category (assumed to ^constant)

 (L) - Amount of phthalates released each year of the
       product's litetime (assumed  to be constant).

 (M)  - Average  lifetime of  the product catagorv  or  srouc
       or  categories  (Arthur  D.  Little,  Inc",  estJLLs)'

 (N) -  Total  amount of  phthalates released over the
       product's lifetime,  calculated  as  (L) x  (M)
       This assumes that a  steady state has been reached
       so that the phthalate inventory in products being
      used is not growing.   This is approximately trS
      for products with DEEP, which has had a VJ C^
      growth rate over the  past  10 years.

(0)  - Amount of phthalates  in products that  have ended
      their useful lives and  will be disposed  of
      Municipal landfills will receive 97% of  this
      amount  annually,  and  37, will  be incinerated

-------

-------
                APPENDIX B.   PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL  PROPERTIES

•
The
             were  selected  for
                              3-1

-------
           TABLE B-l.   PROPERTIES  OF BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)  PHTHALATE


 chemical structure
 Alternate Names

 DEHP
 Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester phthalic acid
 Di(2-ethylhexyl) orthophthalate
 Di-sec-Octyl phthalate
 2-Ethylhexyl phthalate
 1,2-Benzene dicarboxylic acid bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester
  SOTE:
  Bis(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate is sometimes mistakenly reported as its
 isomer,  Di-n-octyl  phthalate (DOP),  in the literature.

 Molecular Weight                  391.0
 (Patty 1963)*      '  '

 Melting  Point                     -50°C
 (Patty 1963) *
 Boiling  point at 5  torr           231°C
 (Lowenheim and Moran,  1975)
                                           —8
 Vapor  pressure at 25°C            6.8 x 10   torr
 (Wolfe  ej: al.  1979)
 Solubility in water at 25°C        0.40 ± 0.05  mg/1
 (Wolfe  sk §L-
 Log  octanol/water  partition        4.89
   coefficient
 (Wolfe  jt  al.   1979)

 CAS  NO. 117-31-7
 TSL  NO. TI  03500
*As cited in Versar (1979b)


                                3-2

-------
                 TABLE B-2.   PROPERTIES OF DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE

      chemical structure
    Molecular Weight   "               278.34


    Melting Point                     -35°c
    (Verschueren 1977>

    Boiling point at 760 torr        340°r
    (Patty  1963)-*

    Vapor pressure at  25°C           2 0 x 10~A
    (Wolfe   et al.   1979)                   X

    Solubility in water at 258C       4 5 me/i
    (Wolfe  et a.   1979)                  8

   Log octanol/water partition       4.94
     coefficient
   (Wolfe  zt al_.  1979)

   CAS NO.  84-74-2
   TSL NO.  TI 08750
        • ^^^^"•""•^^•^™^^^^™™^^^^M^—,^^M^^^
rAs  ciced  in Versar (1979
                                 3-3

-------
                 TABLE B-3.   PROPERTIES OF DIMETHYL PHTHALATE

            chemical structure

                        0
                         l!~~     *3
                         o

           Alternate Names

           DMP
           1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic  acid,  dimethyl ester
           Phthalic acid dimethyl ester
           Methyl phthalate

           Molecular Weight                 194,18


           Melting Point                    08C
           (Verschueren 1977)*

           Boiling point at 760 torr        282°C
           (Veschueren 1977)*

           Vapor pressure at 25°C           2.2 x 10    torr
           (Wolfe  et al.  1979)

           Solubility in water at 25°C      4320  ± 0.37 mg/1
           '(Wolfe  g£ al.  1979)

           Log octanol/water partition      1.90
             coefficient
           (Wolfe  e£ al.  1979)

           CAS NO.  131-11-3
           TSL NO.  TI 15750
*As cited in Versar (1979b)
                                3-4

-------
             TABLE B-4.   PROPERTIES  OF DIETHYL PHTHALATE
  chemical structure
               r,
             — C-0—C,H.
              ,i       2  o
 Alternate Names
 DEP
 1,2-Benzendicarfaoxylic acid, diethyl ester
 Ethyl phthalate  '
 Molecular Weight
 (Patty 1963)*

 Melting Point
 (Patty 1963}*

 Boiling point at 760  torr
 (Verschueren  1977)*

 Vapor  pressre at 25aC
 (Wolfe   et al.   1979)

Log octanol/water partition
  coefficient
 (Wolfe  et_ al_.   1979)
CAS NO. 84-66-2
TSL NO. TI 10500
 222.23
-4Q.5aC
298°C
4.1 x 10   torr
2.94
                             3-5

-------
           TABLE B-5.  PROPERTIES OF DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
chemical structure
              0
            -C-C-CH,
                     3,7
Alternate Names
DNOP
o-Benzenedicarhoxylic acid, dioctyl ester
n-Dioctyl phthalate
Octyl phthalate
Dioctyl-o-benzenedicarboxylate
NOTE:
 Di-n-octyl phthalate is sometimes mistakenly reported as  its  isomer,
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, in the literature.

Molecular Weight                  391.0
(Patty 1963)*

Melting Point                     -25°C
(Patty 1963) *
Boiling point at 4 torr           220" C
(.Patty 1963) *
Vapor pressure at 25°C            2.6 x 10~  torr
(Wolfe  .et al.  1979)
Solubility in water at 25°C       3 ± 0.5 mg/1
(Wolfe  .e_t al.  1979)
Log octanol/water partition       4.77
  coefficient
(Wolfe  e_t al.  1979)
CAS NO. 117-84-0
TSL NO. TI 19250
 *As  cited in Versar (1979b)


                                 3-6

-------
       TABLE B-6.   PROPERTIES OF BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE

    chemical structure
                _C-0— C.H
                         '4* 9
               -C_CH.
   Alternate Names
   BBP
   Benzyl butyl phthalate
   Molecular Weight
                           312.0
   Melting Point
   (EPA-OHMTADS 1977)*
   Boiling point at 760 torr
   (EPA-OHMTADS 1977}*
   Vapor' pressure

   Solubility  in water at  25"C   '
   (Fishbein and Albro 1977)*
   Log octanol/water partition
   coefficient  (The exact  value
   is not  calculated due to  an
   unknown contribution by mole-
   cular folding.  The partition
   coefficient for diethyl phthalate
   is 4.42, calculated as per
  Leo et al.  (1971) *  The log P for
  butyl benzyl phthalate is con-
  sidered to  be greater than that of
  the short chain phthalacc ester).
                          -35°C

                          377°C

                          Not available
                          Insoluble

                          >  4.42
  CAS NO.
  TSL NO.
85-68-7
TH 99900
*As cited in Versar (1979b)

-------

-------
              APPENDIX C.   FATE IN WATER - MODELING RESULTS
      The analysis  of phthalate esters in water utilized the water model
 results  provided by the U.S.  EPA (Wolfe et, a^. 1979).   Because of insuf-
 ficient  hydrolysis data on the compounds of interest for pure water,
 the  investigators  measured second order alkaline hydrolysis rate con-
 stants.   The  rate  generally decreased with an increase in chain branching,
 and  variability  over three factors of ten was noted.  Also, aqueous
 solubilities  reported in Tables B-l through B-6 were measured in this
 investigation and  found to vary over three factors  of ten.   The acid
 catalyzed and neutral pathways of hydrolysis are slow compared with the
 second-order  alkaline pathway that was measured.  To provide inputs for
 the  models, vapor  pressure values were extrapolated to 25°C, using the
 Clausius-Clapyron  equation (Reid and Sherwood 1958).  In addition to the
 octanol/water partition coefficients listed in Tables  B-l through B-6,
 alternative values were computed using a correlation suggested by Hansch
 and  coworkers (1968)  that relates the partition coefficient to the
 aqueous  solubility for organic liquids.   Although differences as large
 as factors of 10^  are reported,  no comments explained  the reasons for
 such disagreements.   Sediment and biomagnification  partition coefficient
 were also computed for the esters of interest.

      To  test  the relative importance of  fate mechanisms  and to estimate
 concentrations,  a  model known as EXAMS (Exposure  Analysis Modeling
 System)  under development at  the U.S.  EPA Athens  laboratory was  employed.
 EXAMS is  based on  methodology developed  at SRI (Smith  et al.  1977)  and
 modified  by the  authors  of the environmental assessment  of  phthalate
 esters (Wolfe .at ail.  1979).   The model is  intended  for use  with  water
 bodies such as rivers,  ponds,  lakes,  and  reservoirs.   Transport  from one
 portion  of a  water body  to another is  represented by flows  of water
 containing the chemical  contaminant  of interest from one compartment to
 another.   Each compartment is  a  homogeneously  mixed  region  containing
 either water  or  sediment.   The lake  model  version employs vertically
 arrayed  compartments, whereas  the river model  represents the  flow by a.
 linear horizontal  succession  of  compartment  pairs.   One  member of each
 pair represents  the flowing water  and  the  other the  associated sediment.
 Thus, transfers  from  compartment  to  compartment and  from water to sedi-
ment are  represented.  Pollutant  discharge  inputs are  prescribed,  and
 flow characteristics  are  selected  from among a set of  prototype  environ-
ments.  Chemical transformation  and  loss by  volatilization  are considered.
Both dynamic  and steady-state  operation of  the models  are permitted  as
options.

     Each of  five phthalate esters was evaluated in  each  of  five siau-
lacad ecosystems:  1) a river, 2)  a  pond,  3) a eutrophic  lake, 4)  an
oligotrophic  lake,  and 3)  a reservoir.

     Results were reported for only  two of  che five astars, DMP and DEHP.
Table C-l summarizes  Che  time  to reach 99% of staady stata, cha decay
                                   C-l

-------
                          TABLE C-l.   TIME REQUIRED  TO REACH 99% OF STEADY STATE,  SEDIMENT AND WATER
                                      CONCENTRATIONS AT 99% STEADY STATE AND HALF-LIVES ESTIMATED FROM
                                      DECAY SIMULATION FOR THE WHOLE SYSTEM.
o
I
     DM I'
    DEMI'
                            Time for 99%    Decay  Simulation
Concentration at
  Steady State	
Ecoajatem
Kivur
I'ond
En trophic Lake
O| igotrophic
Lake
Heaervoi r
Hi ver
I'ond
Eut roplric Lake
O| igoirophic
Lake
K^rvolr
Steady State
38 hr
96 hr
288 hr
144 hr
264 hr
176 day
384
840 mo
120 mo
880 mo
Half-Life
6.9 hr
13 hr
26 hr
19 day
26 hr
18 day
52 mo
103 mo
12 mo
110 mo
Water mg/1
2.2xlO-5
1.9xlO-3
4.4x10-4
3.6xlO~3
3.6xlO~4
0.099
0.099
0.098
0.098
0.094
Sediment nig,
1.5xiO~7
5.3xlO~6
3.8xlO~7
4.6xlO~6
3.5xlO~7
46
2. Ox 1C)2
3. xlO2
1.5X101
2.7xl02
  Eaier concentrations with no loss processes is 0.1 mg/1.

 Source:  Wolfe et al. (1979).

-------
                             .
   a  total for all loss mechanises   ££ r™* "^ half~life  "presents
   percentage loading for t^Sicalf LcI V^T^  half-lives «d
   hydrolysis, biological and ex^rt nrc^   1°*  P^to^sis» option and
   each of the five alaulat* aS"^""^".^ Same  *"  C0**°-ds -
   tion are not included in these  or^S*!; .  ^°latlli2aci0* and sedimenta-
   C-l show that these processes   in IT^ri'  h°WeVer' the  r^ults in Table
   loss mechanisms,  are £S£3ic«t In   ^ CH ChemiCal  and bioi°S^l
   Export or transport accouS  for  98- 99  97  S^TT' ^^ ^ DEHP'
   other hand, DMP exhibits far loJer staadv aL   10SS6S f°r DEHP'   On che
   both the water and  the sediment^            concentrations in
   more rapid  alkaline hydrous ^atf and "bVn ^i"7 bSCaUSe °f the much
   No,e that except in tL riJer! r^^
                               no
  form an upper bound for the concentration/^ ^f"' ?  the simu^tion
  set.  Not only do the other members  £jf?     th'  °ther members of the
  oient, but they also hydrotyze and  biodHr 7"  ™leSiSeS C° the environ-
  is dramatically exhibited  in t^sle^l^0^  ™P±dl7'  ™S tenden
  between DMP and DEHP.   Levels of SfTfH £   con«ntration comparison
  orders  of magnitude below  those ofLS   ^"^^ input are several
  tially  that of a closed compartment wUh a^t^d HPf"lculation ^  essen-
  s.tuation occurring between^he
                           twe            ^ironmental  Exposure
  Che individual fate of DE^P an! ele^n^theTcT ?•?* .197» ««-P«*

  oeo,t SSL t^eSSSLi^f^3^^^- ^
  The PEEC computes concentrations  In sldf   " ^ E?A S7Stem Was 0-°3-
  fixed set of environmentalvariables  Rate  ;0n%ter' ^ fiSh f°r a
  experimental measurements  or  by means o?a'%co^stants «e determined from
  in terms of empirical  relationships   Th'e PE?c 'LT ^°d°10^S -P«c«i*
 which  a steady-state discharge of !^»™   f        dynamic analysis in
 for a  thirty-day  period , foUowel by a ^J?S T° ^ P°nd la  ^^^ned
 charge rate used  for each o oil llLr  ff ^"^'^ clearance.   The  dis-
 for the  thirty days!  oSp'soiS ^ilitv us I ^ f^  WaS  °'15  S111^—
 0.4 given in  Table B-l  ^e vaoor nL     *" * mg/1 in  c°ntrast  with
 in contrast  to 6.3 x ^         -               2'28 X 10   ^  Hg
and
mass ratios in the two simulations Ire «s«S2?£ *?  sedlm«nt to water
found a considerably higher watar to  -J         7 the same' Neel? (1978)
the U.S.  EPA (Wolfe'et al  1979)   Ita*dlMaf. «*««ration ratio than
in partitioning  rasults~-om  <-h  ' *•    •  ^OSol°^e that this difference
m^-t*«^»T-r»T*/^   ,   ,        " "    —.iG w i atlS i^TlC n.3. t7ll"P 1^1* *•^^!l ^*-»_J  •   -.
      ?EEC and the  higher soluh-f-f »-r ^  T    1
-------
                    TABLE C-2.  HALF-LIVES AND % OF LOAD FOR THE CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND
                                EXPORT PROCESSES FOR DMP AND DEHP IN FIVE SIMULATED ECOSYSTEMS
                                     Chemical
                                                                                        Export
Compound Ecosystem
DMP Kiver

Pond
En trophic
Lake
Ol igotrophic
Lake
o
4: Reservoir
DEHP Kiver
Pond
Eutrophlc
Lake
Ol igotrophic
Lake
Reservoir

2.

2.

2.

4.


8.
2.

3.

t
6xl04 hr
3
7x10 hr
O
7x10 hr
i
9x10 hr


2xl04 day
2x10 mo
o
7x10 mo

505 mo
3.
2x10 mo
% Load
0.

0.

0.

0.


0.
0.

1.

1.
1.
04

47

90

96


01
23

7

7
9
— . — . 	 u
t
111 hr

13 hr

27 hr

27 hr


1.5x10 day
l.OxlO5 mo

4
3.5x10 mo

1.3xl05 mo
2.9xl04 mo
% Load
9.4

97

98

99


0.0
0.05

0.18

0.05
0.2
t % Load
11.5 hr 00

693 hr 1.

5.2xJ03 hr 0.

5.3x10 hr 0.


4.7 day 99.
51 mo 99

64 mo 98

8.9 mo 98
.62.5 mo 98


0

51

47


9






Soui-ce:   Wolfe et al.  (1979).

-------
Chlorpyrifos l  th
                of
                              C-5

-------

-------
               APPENDIX D.  FATE IN AIR - MODELING RESULTS
      To estimate concentrations in air, we can assume a constant back-
 ground concentration or OH-radical and write a simple expression
 describing the concentration variation in a box with a uniform area
 source at the surface level and a first order reaction throughout ics
 volume.  Imagine the box with unit horizontal area and height H (the
 mixing height).   It moves along with the wind for a cime t over an area
 emission source strength Q.  This situation is described in equation 1
 as follows:
      dt   H
 where

     X • mass  concentration

     t * time

     Q * area  source  strength

     H = mixing  height

     k » first order  rate  constant
 For  a  background  concentration  of xn  and  a  final  concentration after  a
 time t of xf  the  solution  is:
Using this expression to estimate  the atmospheric  concentration  of  a
phthalate ester requires not only  knowing its decay rate but also the
source strength, the mixing height, and an appropriate residence time
for an urban area.  We have chosen to use dichlorodifluoremethane as a
surrogate tracer to determine the  atmospheric diffusion characteristics.
This compound, like phthalate esters, is associated with widely  dispersed
sources related to the cultural environment.  Measurements in La Jolla,
California by Su and Goldberg (1973) give concentrations of 0.0053  ug/m3.
We allocate CC12F2 emissions by population in order to scale them to the
population of San Diego County,  which was 1,656,300 in 1977 (County of
San Diego 1978a).   The prorata share of the national emissions of
93340 mt yr-1 (Eschenroeder et al. 1979) is 22.3 gm sec'l or 3.7 x
10~8 gin af- 3ec-l assuming an area of emission approximately 600 km2
for San Diego County.   On a typical June day, the' inversion' base at La
Jolla is 1400 ft (427 a).   This  value is taken from a racent air quality
analysis (County of San Diego 1973b).   Su and Goldbers (1973)  also report
a iichiorodifluoromethane concentration of 0.007 ug m^ in the desert

-------
 100  km  away  from  San  Diego.   This will  be  used  for  the background concen-
 tration XQ-   Since  dichlorodifluoromethane is nonreactive on the urban
 scale in the lower  atmosphere,  k can  be neglected.   Expanding the expo-
 nential in equation 2 by a Taylor series,  cancelling the  k in the leading
 term, and taking  the  limit as k approaches zero, we  obtain the following
 axprassion for  the  nonreactive  concentration:

          Qt ,
     •2

-------
                       APPENDIX E.   HUMAN TOXICITY*
S.I  METABOLISM

E.I.I  DEHP
the administered DEHP is excrei--rf <„ VK    -     aion, so  that most  or
     little DEHP 7. f    excreted in the urine as derivatives of MEHP.
                                                "
                                                sinsie
                               -
                                             ••

 dose  U
 «cr.t.d  »  av«.g.  of
 «d 57S !» fsces Schin
 experiment,  rats habituated  to DE    for  7  dy*
                                                             «om)
                                                   »
aosa of i+c
(38%)  and 1
                    of
                                                  aa in Che li
                                                              ver
   erar-ncas, see Chapcar 3.0.

-------
 urine and feces increased.   In parallel studies, chey found that animals
 fed daily oral doses of DEHP (5000 mg/kg in diet) for 49 days had steady-
 state liver concentrations  of 120 mg/kg of labelled residue.  When DEHP'
 dosing was stopped,  detectable activity quickly disappeared from liver
 tissue (half-life of 1-2 days).

      Tanaka at _al.  (1975) also performed tissue distribution studies
 following administration of a single oral dose of 500 mg/kg of 14C-DEHP
 (as a 257, solution in Tween 30)  to male Wistar rats.   A total of 45% of
 the administered 14ODEHP was localized in the stomach and intestine
 1  hour after dosing  with activity in the liver peaking at 3-6 hours.

  .    Schulz and Rubin (1973)  found that intravenously administered doses
 of  l C-DEHP were not only cleared more  slowly  than oral doses (54.6 vs
 80% clearance in 24  hours of  the  200 mg/kg dose),  but also that  a higher
 dose was  cleared more slowly  than a lower dose in male rats.   One hour
 after injection,  only 8.0%  of a 200 mg/kg dose had been converted to
 water-soluble metabolites (i.e.,  MEHP and its  derivatives);  whereas, 25%
 of  the  smaller 0.1 mg/kg dose had undergone  this  conversion.   The unmeta-
 bolized DEHP was  found primarily  in the liver,  spleen,  and carcass.
 After 24  hours,  54.6% of the  higher dose had been recovered  in the water-
 soluble fraction, while  more  than 95% of the lower  dose was  accounted for
 as  water-soluble  material in  the  feces,  urine,  and  intestinal contents.

      These  authors also  measured  the  disappearance  of  labelled DEHP  from
 the blood of  intravenously  injected male rats.  They  found that  the  half-
 life  (t 1/2)  of  the  first phase of  the  biphasic clearance  of  DEHP was
 shorter for  the  low  dose (4.5 minutes)  than for the higher dose  (9.0
 minutes).  The second  clearance phase had  a t  1/2 of  22  minutes  for  the
 low dose; insufficient data precluded calculating t 1/2  for  the  higher
 dose.   The authors attributed  the differential clearance of DEHP  from
 the blood and  tissues  in part to  the  efficiency of  the  compartment  that
 carries out  the primary  metabolism, but  also suggested  that solubility
 problems  may be significant in the  metabolism of the higher dose  (Schulz
 and Rubin 1973).

     Booth et al. (1976) noted that intravenously injected ^C-DEHP
 (200 uCi/kg body weight  in a 1% Tween 80-saline vehicle) was  eliminated
 far more  slowly in deer mice  (Paromyscus maniculatus) than in  laboratory
mice and  rats.  Two weeks after injection, an average of only  42.53%  of
 administered activity had been excreted.

     Tanaka _et _al. (1975) administered  2.3 uCi of carbonyl-labelled
 1 C-DEHP  intravenously to male Wistar rats.  Within 5-7  days subsequent
 to  injection,  75-80% of  the  administered activity was recovered in urine
 and feces; the activity was  negligible in expired CO-?.

     Tanaka at al. (1975) also studied  the distribution  of intravenously
 administered' JH-DEHP in  the  organs of three mala rats sacrificed
 1,2,3,5,12,24, or 168 hours  after receiving a 50 mg/kg dose (1.03 uCi
 per rat).   They found chat the Liver and intestine accumulated mosc  of

-------
   in

   2.293  ug  (0.968
 E.I. 2  DBF
  that
  in the urine (Tanaketal  1978

  Ariyoshi et al.  1976)" M^haUc acid
                                                """» °f
                                                                         '
                                               SUiQea  P^s  demonstrate
                                               P^halate  (MBP)  and  excrete

                                              *  lanchfield
    .                                                - -
biliary excretion of DBF in rats alfeftral L  •     reP°«ed significant
during the first                            administration, particularl
thereafter.
                                             ,  but
                                                            steadily
saooon,  nan),  che
                                          mc.scine  (rat,  terret,
                                3-3

-------
 E-l-3  DMP. PEP, DNOP. and BBP

      Kitanaka et al.  (1977) reported that 82 and 90% of  the activity  of
 orally administered ^C-DEP and ~4C-DMP, respectively, was excreted in
 the urine of rats and mica.  No additional details were  available.

      When incubated in vitro with the contents of the isolated rat small
 intestine, DEP and DMP have been shown to undergo hydrolysis to their
 corresponding monoesters (Rowland at al. 1977).  Laka et al. (1977) also
 round that intestinal cell preparation from rat, cerretT blboon, or man
 and hepatocytes rrom rat, farret,  and baboon were able to hvdrolyze DMP
 DEP,  and DNOP to their monoalkyl derivatives in vitro.
 u J            — — '  (1978)  reP°rted that 5 ml of rat liver homogenata
 hydrolyzed 100% of a 2 mg dose of DMP and 75% of an equivalent amount
 of DNOP In vitro in 3  hours.   An equivalent amount (5 ml) of rat kidney
 homogenate hydrolyzed  approximately 75% of a 2 mg dose of DMP in 3 hours
 but required 5  hours to hydrolyze the same amount of DNOP.

      No data were found on the BBP ester.

 E.2.   ANIMAL STUDIES

 E.2.1  Carcinogenic ity

      The  carcinogenicity  study conducted  for DEHP was  described  previ-
 ously.  No  long  term carcinogenicity  studies have been conducted for the
 other phthalate  esters.   However,  no-  increased  incidence  of  neoplasms
 were  noted  in lifetime feeding studies with  DEHP  (Carpenter  et al.  1953
 Harris  et al. 1956), DBP  (LeBreton 1952) and DMP  (Lehman  19557 at  dietary
 levels  from 200-500  mg/kg/day.

      Groups  of twenty  strain A male mice injected  intraperitoneally three
 times weekly for  8 weeks with  150,  400, or 800 mg/kg of BBP  displayed  no
 increased incidence  of pulmonary adenomas compared to  saline-injected
 controls  (0.20 lung  tumors/mouse for  the 800 mg/kg BBP group vs  0.19 for
 saline  controls).  Mice exhibited  a marked lung tumor  response (19.6
 tumors /mouse), however, to the  positive control, 1000 mg/kg  urethan
 (Theiss .et al. 1977).
E.2.2  Mutagenicity

E.2.2.1  DEHP
     Stenchever et _al. (1976) found no statistically significant increase
in chromosome aberrations in human laukocytas exposed for 4 hours fo
concentrations of 60.0,  6.0, 0.6,  or 0.06'ug/ml of DEHP, or in human
fetal lung cells exposed for 5 days in a aedium containing 6.0 ug/1 of
the iiestar.

-------
  clear dose-
                                                                  , no
          TA ,., IA U37,  IA 15J8

  E.2.2.2  DBP
                                            S
                                                 41"'
 E.2.2.3  DEP
          effect of                ,

diester  to a non-o,utagen±c MtaboUt.

and the  station fraqL=v ob"ined
                                               •«•*«••• the positive
                                                conversion of the


                                                      "' °E? t""d
Z.2.2.4  3BP
    No nucagsnic  activicy was discove
  ertouc miWM ia :he toes  Sa'



-------
        TABLE E-l.   CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS AND SISTER-CHROMATID

                    EXCHANGE (SCE)  PRODUCED BY DEHP
   Dose (M)             Breaks/Cell         .   SCE/Call -
BUdR * ethanol            0.0575           3.73 + 0.32


1 x 10"11                  0.08             9,97 + 0.72    (p <0.05)

      -4
1x10                    0.06             9.50+0.58    (p <0.05)


1 x 10                    0.08            11.0 + 0.9      (p <0.05)
Source:  Abe and Sasaki (1977).

-------
         TABLE  E-2.   CHROMOSOME  ABERRATIONS  AND  SISTER-CHROMATID
                     EXCHANGE  (SCE) PRODUCED BY  DBF
	Dose M)	            Breaks/Cell            SCS/Cell ± SE

BUdR +  ethanol               0.575            8.78 ±0.32

1 X 10  °                      °'10            10-6  ±  0.72    (p  0'16            13.6  +  1.00    (p<0.05)
1 x 10"3
Source:   Abe and Sasaki (1977).

-------
 TA 98 (frameshift mutant)  or strain TA 100 (base substitution mutant).
 The concentration of BBP was not given (Rubin _e_t al. 1979).

 E.2.2.5   Summary

      No  definitive conclusions  can be-drawn on the genetic risk from
 exposure to phthalata esters at the present time.   Conflicting studies
 on ;he mutagenic activity  of DEHP show no increase in chromosomal
 aberrations in either human leukocytes (60 ug/ml)  or Chinese hamster
 cells (150  ug/ml),  while a third study notes  an increase in the frequency
 of both  chromosome breaks  and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese
 hamster  cells  exposed to a much lower concentration of DEHP (1 x 10~5 M
 or 0.3 ug/ml).   However, these  increases  in the frequencies of sister
 chromatid exchange and aberrations were less  than  two-fold the control
 value and without a clear  dosage effect.   Consequently,  the ability to
 make  extrapolations is confounded.   No information was found on the
 mutagenic potential of either DMP or DNOP and no _in vivo mutagenesis
 data  were available for  any of  the phthalate  esters.

      A single  study reported that DEP was mutagenic in an in vitro
 microbial study  with Salmonella typhimurium TA 100 but only in the
 absence  of  metabolic activation,  while BBP was  not mutagenic with or
 without  metabolic activation in strains TA 98 (frameshift mutant)  or
 TA 100 (base-pair mutant).

 E.2.3.   Teratogenesls

 E.2.3.1  DEHP

      Rat

      Singh _ejt al.  (1972) injected  groups  of five pregnant  Sprague  Dawley
 rats  intraperitoneally with  5 or  10 rag/kg  of  DEHP  on days  5,  10,  and 15 of
 gestation.  Fetuses were examined  on  day  20.  No increase  in deaths  was
 observed in DEHP-treated rats but  a dose-related increase  in the  inci-
 dence of fetal resorptions was  reported (26.8 and  8.2%,  respectively,
 for the high and  low dose groups  compared with  6.8% for  cottonseed-oil
 controls).  Fetal weight (p  <0.01) was significantly decreased  in  both
 DEHP-treated groups; and the number of live fetuses was  slightly reduced,
with  an  incidence of 91.8% live fetuses in the  5 ml/kg group  and  73.2%
 in the 10 ml/kg group  compared with 93.2%  in  cottonseed-oil  controls.
A  22% incidence of  gross abnormalities including anophthalmia,  absence
 of tail,  twisted hind  legs, and hematomas  was seen in  the high  dose
 group but no abnormalities were seen at 5  ml/kg.  No skeletal abnormali-
 ties were observed among any of the DEHP-treated fetuses.

     Garvin _et_ _al.  (1976b)  intravenously injected pregnant rats with
 daily doses of lag/kg or 3.7 ag/kg of DEHP in a sterile  rac  plasma on
 days  5-15 of gestation.  Mo differences between control and  created
 animals were noted  in  reras of growth rates of dams, littar  size,  pup
weights,  or incidence of dead or resorbed  fetuses.
                                  S-3

-------
      Mouse
  available.


      Rabbit
 was 94% compared »ith"alu2 of 89  87  afd 777  ?"T *° """^ *«"P«
                                               1id

                   -
 E.2.3.2  DMP
                     irs STI
        .sr.s:    rs     ".1-'

3-,-                5                    ' '          1 '
3-,-l.t.! aono^ukes
tiv.lv.

-------
 abnormal skull bones  were the most common skeletal deformities
 (Singh £t £l.  1972).

      Chick  embryo  studies have demonstrated  DMP as highly embryotoxic
 (Haberman et  al. 1968,  lijo  1975,  Bower  et al.  1970,  Lee at al.  1974a).
 Haberman at_ ad.  (1963)  reported 100%  mortality  among  chick embryos
 injected in ovo  on day  9  with 0.1  ml  of  a 57. emulsion of DMP in  Hank's
 balanced salt  solution  compared with  24.0% mortality  in vehicle  controls.
 Lee _at al.  (1974a)  found  70%  mortality among chick embryos injected on
 day 3 with  0.05  ml of Ringer's  solution  saturated  with DMP.   Controls
 injected with  Ringer's  solution alone showed 19% mortality.   In  another
 study, injection of 0.5 ml of the  undiluted  diester into day 3 chick
 embryos  caused 87% mortality  compared with 18%  mortality in controls
 (Bower et al.  1970).

     Lee at, al.  (1974a) tested  the effects of different  concentrations
 of DMP in agar on  the development  of  explanted  streak-stage  chick
 embryos.  The  embryos were grown on agar  containing 0.05,  0.1, 0.5,  1.0, or
 2.0 mg/ml of DMP.  At the three  lowest concentrations,  33,  18, and 7%
 of the embryos,  respectively, developed normally; whereas  none of  the
 embryos  grown  on agar containing 1.0  mg/ml or above of DMP  showed  normal
 development.   The  defects most  commonly observed were  those  affecting
 neural tube fusion and somite development.

 E.2.3.3  PEP

     Singh  et:  al.  (1972) administered DEP via intraperitoneal  injection
 to groups of five pregnant Sprague Dawley rats on days 5,  10, and  15  of
 gestation.  Each group received 1.686, 1.012, or 0.506 ml/kg/injection.
 Four sets of control animals were  either untreated  or injected with
 distilled water, normal horns and  fetuses were removed from  dams on  day
 20.  No  fetal deaths were noted in any DEP-treated dams.  The number  of
 resorptions was markedly increased in the dams receiving the lowest
 (44.4%) dose and slightly at the highest dose (3.6%).   Although the
 intermediate dose did not produce any resorption sites,  the  reason for
 this is not clear.   The average fetal weight  was significantly reduced
 in all DEP-treated  groups (p <0.01), but no gross abnormalities were
observed among fetuses from any of the DEP-treated dams.

     Skeletal abnormalities in 30-50% of the  fetuses examined were
 increased 31.3, 47.1,  and 26.3% in the fetuses from dams injected with
and incomplete or missing skull- bones were the most prominent skeletal
abnormalities.   These defects were not observed in untreated or dis-
 tilled water-injected controls, while those receiving  10 ml/kg of
cottonseed oil or normal saline had skeletal  abnormality frequencies of
 10.7 and 14.3%, respectively.

     Bower at al. (1970) injected 0.025  ml of DEP into the yolk sac of
 fertilized chicken  eggs.  DEP-injaction  increased the  number of chicks
that died befora hatching (63.7%) compared with 44.3%, 53.4%, and 31.1,"
                                  2-10

-------

  available.



  E.2.3.4  DBF

     24, -and 21% respectively  for the hi h  .uses  *Xamned **re increased

 rj-z-T-- - :-£:- "
 had reduced birth weigJts'   No addLL T,  "  *?' higheSt d°Se §r°uP also
 1971).           weignts.   No additional details were available  (Piekacz
               .

receiving 4 ml/kg (4 2 a/LT nf nnS f lltter ln Sprague Dawley rats








group, were bom without eyes.               Utters  ln the 2 ml/kg
                                                                   in
                                                    of

-------
      Injection  of  9-day  chick embryos  with 0.1 ml of a 5.0% suspension
 of  DBF  in  Hank's balanced  salt solution produced 59% mortality compared
 with  24.4% controls.   No teratogenic effects  were observed (Haberman
 !£ jtl.  1968).

 £.2. 3. 5  BBP

      Nine-day chick embryos jLn ovo were injected with 0.1  al of a 5%
 suspension of BBP  in Hank's balanced salt  solution (Haberman at_ al.  1968).
 Injections were made into  either  the allantoic cavity or the chorio-
 allantoic  membrane  (CAM);  vehicle controls  were established for each site
 of  injection.  BBP injected into  the CAM caused 68%  of the embryos  to die
 before hatching, compared  with 27% mortality  in controls.   Injection of
 BBP into the allantoic cavity  caused 28% of the embryos to die _in ovo
 compared with 18% embryo fatality in controls.   All  BBP-treated chicks
 that  hatched were alive  at 21  days post-hatching.  Only one of 26 chicks
 that  hatched from eggs injected in the  allantoic cavity was reported to
 have  suffered adverse neurologic effects.

      Bower et al.  (1970) injected 0.05 ml of  undiluted BBP into the  yolk
 sac of fertilized chick  eggs between 'the 65th and  72nd hour of develop-
 ment.   A total of 48.8% of the BBP-treated  embryos died before hatching
 compared with fatalities of 31.1, 53.4,  and 44.8%  in uninoculated con-
 trols, in  vegetable-oil controls, and sesame  oil controls,  respectively.
 None  of the hatched chicks showed any congenital malformation.

 E.2.3.6  POP

      Bower .at al. (1970) injected 0.1 ml DOP  undiluted into  fertile  eggs.
No significant effect was reported on the viability  or development of
 chick embryos.   Injection of 0.1 ml of a 5% suspension of DOP  in  Hank's
 balanced salt solution into eggs containing 9-day chick embryos,  however,
 caused 53% of the embryos to die before hatching compared with  24%
mortality  in controls.   Of those that hatched,  5 OOP-treated chicks  out
 of 66 had neurologic abnormalities,  such as a staggering gait  and severe
 lethargy;  these effects were not observed among  377  controls chicks.
One-third of the DOP-treated chicks  were dead at 21  days post-hatching,
 compared with a 9% mortality in controls (Haberman et_ al.   1968).

 E.2.3.7
     In summation, DEHP at high doses ( > 5 ml/kg) is capable of inducing
gross abnormalities in both rats and mice.  DMP (0.3 ml/kg), DB?
(0.3 ml/kg) and DEP (0.5 ml/kg) have also produced skeletal malforma-
tions in rats.  Injection of phthalate esters directly into developing
chick eggs produced no cerata with DBP, BBP, or DMP and a single inci-
dence of malrotation of Che leg with DEP.  Increased embryo mortality
was no tad for DMP, DEP, DBP, DOP, and BBP.  However, mortality values
for controls were also elevated raising questions as to the value of
these findings.

-------
 E.2.4  Reproductive Effects

 E.2.4.1  Oral Administration

     - Shaffer _et _al.  (1945) was the first to report changes in the testes
 of rats that had been fed diets containing 0.9 g/kg/day or 1.9 g/kg/day
 of DEHP for 90 days.   The authors noted tubular atrophy and degeneration
 in the tastes, resembling senile changes,  in all animals at these two
 dose levels.   No effect was seen in rats given 0.2 g/kg/day or 0.4 g/kg/
 day of DEHP for the same period.   Similarly, Oishi and Hiraga (1976)
 reported a decrease in testis weight (attributable to an actual decrease
 in the number of testicular cells) in male rats fed 1 or 2% DEHP in the
 diet for 10 days.   An increase in the levels of testicular lipids was
 also noted.

      No adverse reproductive effects were  noted in two generations of
 Sherman rats  fed 0.4,  0.13,  or 0.04% DEHP  in their diets for one (F]_
 generation)  or two  years (P^ generation).   Litters born, total number
 of pups born,  mean  number of litters per female,  mean size of litters,
 maximum number of litters by any  female, pups stillborn or killed at
 once by the mother, and mean age  at last litter were recorded from
 treated and control  animals.   The  only change noted among the DEHP-treated
 animals was  a decrease in the mean number  of litters per female among Fi
 rats at the  0.4% level when compared with  controls.   This difference,
 however,  was  attributed to an unusually prolific  F^ control group,  as
 the mean number of  litters born to the  DEHP-treated F^ rats was  not
 significantly different from that of PJL controls  or DEHP-treated animals
 at any  dose'level (Carpenter _e_t ad.  1953).

      In another study,  seven mature male albino ferrets were.fed 1%  DEHP
 in the  diet  for 14 months.   Examinations of  sections of testes from  both
 control and DEHP-treated animals  revealed  active  spermatogenesis with
 spermatids or  spermatozoa identifiable  in  the seminiferous  tubules of
 all animals.   However,  three out  of seven  DEHP-treated males  exhibited
 complete  or nearly complete  absence of  germinal epithelium  in a  few
 tubules.  The  relative  testes  weights per  100 g body weight for  the
 control and treated animals  were  0.28 + 0.02  g and  0.37 + 0.02 g,
 respectively.   The absolute  testes  weights in treated animals  were
 significantly  different  from those  of controls; i.e.,  3.42  +  0.09 g
 for  controls vs  3.10 +  0.21  g  for  treated  animals  (Lake e_t  al. 1976).

 E.2.4.2   Intraperitoneal  Administration

     Daily intraperitoneal injections of 1.25  g/kg of  DEHP  for 5  days
 consecutively  caused a  29% reduction in the concentration of  testosterone
 in  the  testicular blood  of nine male rats  (0.29 + 0.04  ug/ml vs  0.41  4-
 0.^0^ ug/ml in  control animals).  The decrease  of  testosterone  secretion
 after DEHP administration may  have  resulted in  a reduction  of  tiastis
weight  and fertility.   DEHP  administration also caused  a  22" reduction
 in  testosterone  sacration following human chorionic  gonadotropin  (hCG)

-------
 stimulation.   Several control animals injected intravenously with
 100 I.U.  of hCG 15 minutes prior to blood sampling had a testicular
 testosterone concentration of 1.36 ± 0.15 ug/ml vs a concentration of
 0.96  +0.09 ug/ml in ten treated animals following hCG stimulation.
 This suggests that DEHP may inhibit the biosynthetic production of
 testosterone from cholesterol (Oishi and Hiraga 1979).

      In a study of the effects  of phthalate esters on reproduction in
 Sprague Dawley rats,  Peters and Cook (1973) found that DEHP prevented
 implantation in seven of ten rats when injected intraperitoneally at
 3,  6,  and 9 days  of gestation at concentrations of 2 ml/kg or 4 ml/kg
 body weight.   These doses  also  had an adverse  effect on parturition.'
 Two  of the three  rats died during parturition.   Excessive bleeding was
 noted in  all  three DEHP-treated females  at  parturition.

      In a second  experiment,  Peters  and  Cook  (1973)  found that the
 developmental stage at which the DEHP  was administered determined the
 effect.   Only those rats treated on  or before  day 6  of pregnancy with
 2 ml/kg of  DEHP show  a reduction in  the  number  of implants.   When the
 same dose is  administered  after day  7, effects  include excessive maternal
 hemorrhaging  and  fetal retention.  FX  females born in  this  study had
 normal  reproductive functions.

      In another study designed  to  test the  reproductive  effects  of DEHP
 on male ICR mice,  Singh _et  al.  (1974)  administered a single  intraperi-
 toneal  dose of 12.78,  19.17,  or  25.56 ml/kg (12.6, 18.9,  or  25.2 g/kg)
 prior  to  the  initiation  of  a  12-week mating period.  Ten  DEHP-treated
 males as  well as  ten  untreated  controls were mated to  two untreated
 virgin  females; females were  replaced on a weekly basis  for  12 weeks.
 Pregnant  females were  sacrificed  shortly before parturition.  An anti-
 fertility effect was  noted  at all  levels tested but was most  pronounced
 in the high dose group; only  25% of females mated with high dose  males
 became pregnant compared with a  71% incidence of  pregnancy in controls
 (see Table  E-3).  The number of implants and the  number of live  fetuses
 per pregnancy were also reduced in females mated  with high dose males
 (15 and 22%, respectively).  A marked increase in early fetal deaths
was noted at all dose levels with  the incidence in the high dose  group
more than double that observed for controls.

     These data indicate that DEHP at the dose levels tested produces
 dominant  lethal effects in male mica.  Furthermore, if the data ara
 analyzed  in light of  the developmental stage of the sperm at  the  time
of DEHP injection,  the most severe effects are manifested in gametes
 exposed to DEHP at a post-meiosis stage.

E.2.4.3  Intravenous Administration

     Twenty prapufaertai female and tan adult aala rats racaived 5 ml
 (4.9 g/kg/'day) DEHP undiluted by intravenous injection on days 1, 5,
and 10 of  a 22-day study (Seth at al. 1976).  Control animals were

-------
                TABLE E-3.  ANTIFERTILIIY  AND  MUTAGENIC  EFFECTS
                            OF DEHP  IN MALE MICE
rJ/r. DIncide^e of Implants per
-iSS&Sl Pregnancies to Pregnancy
0.0 71
12.6 56
18.9 59
25.2 95
6.J
11.04 +
11.2 + 0
"11.2 + 0

9.4 + 0
0.17
.18
.17

.48
Early Fetal Deaths Live Fetuses
per Pregnanev n^r pr^»nnr,r.T
0.43 ±
0.79 +
0.57 +

0.89 +
0.05
0.11
0.06

0.35
11.0 ± 0.17
10.4 +
10.6 +

8.6 +
0.23
0.18

0.65
Source:   Singh et al.  (1974).

-------
 injected with normal saline.   Animals were sacrificed on day 22, and
 Che organs were removed and submitted to gross, microscopic", and bio-
 chemical examination.

      Assays for several of  the enzymes involved in energy metabolism
 revealed DEHP-related  changes  in activity in the ovaries and testes of
 treated  animals as  compared with controls.   The activity of succinic
 dehydrogenase was decreased by 38% (p <0.01)  in ovaries  and 42%
 (p  <0.001)  in testes.   Likewise,  the  activity of ATPase  was decreased
 by  34% in ovaries and  by 29% in testicular  tissues (p <0.001 for both).
3-glucuronidase activity was increased in ovary and testis; 50 and 67%,
 respectively (p <0.001 for  both).

      On  gross examination,  the scrota of all  DEHP-treated males appeared
 to  be enlarged when  compared with  those  of  control animals.  Histopatho-
 logical  examination  of the  testes  from DEHP-treated males,  however,
 showed abnormal pathology" with changes including a markedly thickened
 tunica albuginea, edema of  the testicular capsule and interstitium,
degeneration of the  epithelium of  the seminiferous  tubules, eccentric
nuclei and  vacuolization of the cytoplasm in  spermatogonial cells,  and
degeneration of spermatids.  The blood vessels  of the testes  were
congested and red blood cells were seen  lying  free  in the  edematous
fluid of  interstitial  spaces.   Histopathological examination  revealed
normal pathology of  the ovary  and  testis  in control animals and of  the
ovary of -treated animals, despite  the enzyme  activity alterations  in
the latter.

     Thus,  in rats,   administration of  0.4% DEHP  in  the diet (M3.2 g/kg/day)
for 2 years  produced no  adverse effects on reproductive  functions, but
tubular atrophy and degeneration of the  testes were  noted  in  rats admini-
stered 0.9  g/kg/day DEHP  for 90 days.  No effects were seen at  0.4 g/kg/
day.  At high  doses, DEHP disrupts succinic dehydrogenase,  adenosine
triphosphatase, and betaglucuronidase  levels in  rat- gonads  (4.9  g/kg)  and
produces dominant lethal  and antifertility effects  in mice  after a single
intraperitoneal injection (12.8 ml DEHP/kg).  Testicular damage  has  also
been reported  in a non-rodent species, the ferret,  administered  1% DEHP
for 14 months.

     No information was found on the reproductive effects of DMP, DEP,
DBP, 3BP, or DNOP.

E.2.5  Other Toxicoloqical Effects

E.2.5.1  Chronic Studies

     DEHP

     No adverse affects on mortality,  hematological parameters,  or
fertility and no incidence of  neoplasms were noted in two generations
of Sherman strain rats  maintained on diats containing O.i, 0.13, or
0.04S DEHP  (corresponding Co 0.2, 0.06, and 0.02 g/kg/day, respectively)
                                 E-16

-------
for periods of 1-2 years.  Three-fourths of  the  parental generation

nil    gr°UP) and thS Fl ^neration w"* killed after  1 ^ear on the
DEHP  diet.  Mean  bodv weishfn  nf P-,  -,~j T?     •   ,








i» these
 rats  0.0,
     Harris ^t  al   (1956)  fed groups of 43 male and 43 female tfiatar







4
                             based on a
3  6                        "ere    e™"   in aniaals sacrificed at
        -
                                                    .
    DBF
   DMP
                                                        3.01 DKP ln

-------
                                  TABLE E-4.  RELATIVE ORGAN  WEIGHTS OF RATS FED DEHP
i
»-••
QJ
        %  DKIIP


        "   1
         MALES







          0.0


          0. I
         l''EMALES_



         0.0


         O.I
mg/p Body Weight (% Change from ControIs)	
3 months

30
33
43
27
33
40
Liver
.2
.9 (12 )
.3 (43)
.6
.9 (23)
.4 (46)
Kidney
7.4
7.7 (4)
7.9 (7)
7.3
8.1 (11)
8.1 (11)
6 months
Liver
26.4
30.4 (15)
32.3 (22)
27.2
29.9 (10)
35.3 (30)
Kidney
7.0
6.9 (1)
6.7 (4)
7.0
7.5 (7)
7.9 (13)
N
8
8
8
8
8
8
12 months
Liver
32.4
' 30.0
28.7
31.8
33.0
27.3
7.
(7) 7.
(11)7.
7.
(4) 7.
(14)7.
Kidney N
1 1
0 (1) 2
0 (1) 2
4 1
A (0) 2
6 (3) 4
24 months
Liver
41.9
34.4 (18)
41.9 (0)
42.8
35.0 (18)
37.6 (12)
Kidney
8.1
7.7
8.1
8.5
8.0
8.0

(5)
(0)

(6)
(6)
      Sonic:*.!:  Harris  et  al.  (1956).

-------
   £-2.5.2  Subchronic Studies

       DEEP

            Oral Administration
                                          ,
  were 1.9, 0.9  04  n  2  ,-,,-nn   /i  7T       days.   The doses received
2.0%
and 2.0. !eve!
paired feeding study reveaUd  chat
                                     ~4t"
                                                           0.  0.2,  1.0,  or

                                                              "  "» 1'°
                                                              conco°il:an'
 a decrease in packed cell vlum    g   PS' -  °th6r tOXic effects in=

             ft diet for
                                                       admini"ered  2'. 0%
     Five-week-old rats were siven DFWP  fny  te.  A
of 0.01, 0.025, 0 05  0 5  or i nJ DEHPufor  16  days  at concentrations
                      °« i
          were   de =    h
or the livers from aal.
die:,  rne amounts of Uver jivcos-n
non-coUagen) .ere sigmfloanti v   '
controls.  «. tttlTitiM o, ,he
                                            0  5  or    o-
                                            rf  ^ f     ;
                                          (p < 0     ^
                                              -
                                                                  decer-

                                                                  """"
                                                              la  ths

-------
 acid phosphatase,  and cytochrome c oxidase were also increased signifi-
 cantly (p  <0.01) when expressed per gram of liver weight.  Examinations
 of the activity of the hepatic microsomal mixed function oxidases (per
 gram of liver weight)  in animals fed 0.5% DEHP revealed the following:
 microsomal protein and cytochrome P-450 levels were elevated in males;
 and aminopyrine N-demethylase  and aniline hydroxylase were elevated in
 females but decreased  in males.

      In a  similar  study conducted by Moody and Reddy (1979),  five male
 rats  were  fed chow containing  2% DEHP for 3 weeks.   They were then
 sacrificed for liver  studies in which a significant liver enlargement
 was observed  (p <0.001).   Enzyme assays revealed a  doubling in catalase
 activity and  a seventeen-fold  increase in the  activity of carnitine
 acetyl transferase.  Similar effects,  although of lesser magnitude,
 were  produced by the dietary administration of a 27, concentration of
 the DEHP metabolite, 2-ethylhexyl alcohol or its structural analogs,
 2-ethylhexanoic acid,  and 2-ethylhexyl aldehyde.

      Otake  et al.  (1977)  administered 200 mg/mouse  of  DEHP  orally to
 male  mice  every 3  days  for 3 weeks.   Liver enlargement,  swelling  of
 renal  tubules,  decreased  spermatogenesis,  and  an increase in  hepatic
 cytochrome  P-450 were noted.  Microscopic  examination  of the  heptocytes
 revealed proliferation  of the smooth  endoplasmic reticulum, disorders
 in  the  distribution of  the rough  endoplasmic raticulum,  swelling  of
 the mitochondria,  and a decrease  in glycogen content.   Similarly,
 Yamada  (1974)  found that  1-4 ml/kg/day of  DEHP,  given  orally  to mice
 for 3 weeks,  caused.liver enlargement  and  a decrease in  liver glycogen
 content.

     Young male rats given DEHP at a  dose  of 2 g/kg/day  for 21 days  had
 liver weights  that were more than double  those of control animals
 (Lakelet al.  1975).  The activities of  several hepatic enzymes were
 determined with results as follows:   succinic dehydrogenase and glucose-
 6-phosphatase  activities were decreased by 40%;  aniline-4-hydroxylase
 activity was  decreased 30%; alcohol dehydrogenase activity increased 50%
by day 14,  then decreased to 120% of control activity by day  21.  The
microsomal P-450 content was increased  34% at day 4, but was  elevated
 only 13% over  control activity by day  21.

     Guinea pigs were fed 0.13 or 0.04% DEHP in  the diet for  1 year.
This corresponds to a mean intake of 0.064 of 0.019 g/kg/day  over the
 course of the  study (Carpenter et_ _al.  1953).  A dose-related  increase
in food consumption was observed for males and females, although signifi-
cantly elevated body weights were seen only in animals at the lower dose
 level.  Females in both dose groups had elevated liver weights.

     Ota _2t: jil. (1974)  found that oral administration of 0.5 g/kg/day or
3.0 g/kg/day of DEEP for 1-3 months resulted in liver and kidney degenera-
 tion in aica.
                                 2-20

-------
   da                                             H



                      H3S
   areas of the liver, as well Is  moder^t       congestion In subcapsular
   in  the kidney.                 moderate  congestxon and cell enlargement
      the
  DEEP    r alohrioha       "" OMl d°Sa  °'  120°

  that of coutro! anilL aL et'n", "*  1'**

  •ent was noted at 14 months i
 Conversely, DEHP- treatment produced a .iSfLa^      resPe«ively.
 activity of the  follou-fn^ .   uucea a significant increase  in the

 in  th.             r               -ction and ,orphology
6                            Uv

and severe  DeritonitS « wt»«   e°lars!mant'  "sticular atrophy,

-------
 production  fay  human chorionic  gonadotropin  reduced compared with controls
 (Oishi  and  Hiraga  1975).

     Lawrence  ejc al.  (1975)  calculated  "chronic"  LD$Q  values for mice
 based on  a  12-week study  in  which  the animals  received varying doses of
 DEHP via  intraperitoneal  injection.  They found that the  acute LD5o (ip)
 for mice  (37.3 g/kg) was  much  greater than  the chronic LD5Q, which thev
 calculated  to  be 1.37 g/kg.

          Intravenous Administration

     Several animal  studies  have been designed to  more closely simulate
 the conditions of  human exposure to DEHP.   Garvin  et_ al.  (1967a)  injected
 rats intravenously,  twice weekly,  for 63 days  with doses  of  1.0 mg/kg/day
 or 3.7 mg/kg/day of  DEHP.  The higher dose  is  considered  equivalent to
 the maximum dose of  DEHP  that  a 70 kg human would  receive in 12 units of
 blood that  had been  stored at  4°C  for 21 days  in polyvinyl chloride blood
 storage bags.  No  toxicologically  significant  differences were observed
 between treated and  control  animals in survival rates,  growth  rates,
 general behavior,  hemograms, serum chemistry values, liver function,
 absolute and relative organ weights, or histopathology.

     Rutter (1975) reported no adverse effects in  ten  beagle dogs  that
 received intravenous doses of  0.5, 0.75 or  1.4 mg/kg/day  daily for 3
 weeks.   The DEHP administered was  obtained  by  storing  the plasma of  dogs
 fed high fat diets in polyvinyl chloride blood storage  bags  at 36°C.
 Bags were stored for 4, 6, or  12 weeks,  respectively,  to  allow leaching
 of DEHP into the plasma.  The  test animals were then given the doses
 noted above.

     In another study, rhesus monkeys received weekly or  biweekly
 transfusions of plasma or platelet-enriched plasma  that had  been stored
 in polyvinyl chloride blood storage bags for periods up to 1 year
 (Jacobsen ej: al.  1975, 1977).  The cumulative  concentration  of  DEHP
 received by rhesus monkeys during this period ranged from 6.6  mg/kg
 to 33 mg/kg.  At the end of 1 year, six of  seven monkeys  showed signs
 of abnormal liver pathology including vacuolization or proliferation of
Kupffer cells,  foci of parenchymal necrosis, or chronic inflammatory
 cell infiltrates.   Four of seven animals had abnormaJ  99mxc  liver-spleen
 scan ratios (indicates severe or moderate impairment of hepatic perfu-
 sion);  these changes persisted as long as 14 months after transfusion
 in the three animals that had received platelet-rich plasma.   Six  of
 seven animals showed abnormal clearance of sulfobromophthalein.  Traces
 of DEHP could still be found in liver tissue of animals that had been
 transfused with platelet-rich plasma obtained by biopsy up to  14 months
 after transfusion.

     Daily intravenous injections of 50, 100,  300, or 500 mg/kg of DEHP
were given  zo beagle dogs for 14 days.   One  of two dogs receiving  the
 300 mg/kg dosa  died on day 4.  The two dogs  receiving 500 mg/kg died on

-------
   •-
       PEP



 weeks.   The total bLv ^J^J^^i!.!*^2:0*  dietary DEP for 3
waoles   TVi^  *»*..i  i.  j     ,  ,	      a '•'<"• «j.«tary utr  tor 3








increased (18 and 196% above controls,  respectively).




                                                     16 weeks.   These
                                           .r















significantly at all  dose  levels  with a ?lf in       w*« enlarged
Additionally, males and  feSs at  the 5 Jf levI^H 'Y^ 5'°% leVSl'
increases in the relative  weights of  th.'h  levej.fowed significant







     •   	' -r°m -onc-°^ ''alues at  the  termination  of  che 3'udv.
                                 E-23

-------
      Despite the enlargement observed in most of the organs studied,
 only the liver and kidney tissues were found to show any pathological
 changes.   Some fatty degeneration and slight vacuolation was seen in the
 liver,  with occasional pyelonephritis and lymphocytic invasion of the
 kidney.   Those lesions,  however,  were not dose-related.

      Galley ec al.  (1966)  injected from twenty to thirty white mice (io)
 with an emulsion of DEP  in 3%  acacia (125 mg/kg)  daily for 6 weeks.
 These animals  did noc show any significant differences from vehicle
 control animals when compared  in  terms of body weight gain;  organ weight
 body weight ratios  for liver,  heart,  lungs,  kidneys,  spleen and tastes;
 or  hemato logical parameters, including hemoglobin concentration,  hema-
 tocrit,  and white count.   All  of  the test animals had some degree of
 peritonitis at autopsy.
     To determine a subchronic LDso value, Lawrence _et  al.  (1975)
 injected  ten male mice  intraperitoneally  five  times per week for 14
 weeks with a series of  doses of undiluted DEP.  They  calculated  a chronic
 ip LD5Q value of approximately 1.56 g/kg  compared with  an acute  value  of
 3.22 g/kg.

     DMP

     Lawrence et al.  (1975) found that DMP was more toxic when adminis-
 tered in  a series of  intraperitoneal doses five times per week for 18
 weeks than it was in  a  single ip dose.  The "chronic" ip LD50 value of
 DMP in mice was calculated to be 1.4 g/kg compared with an acute LD5Q
 value of  3.98 g/kg.   Daily topical application of 4.0 ml/kg  (4.8 g/kg)
 of DMP to rabbits' skin for 90 days produced lung edema, chronic
 nephritis, and slight to moderate liver damage; the skin itself  was
 unaffected (Lehman 1955). •

     Repeated dermal  applications of DMP were reported  to retard weight
 gain, decrease total blood protein, and increase serum  gamma-globulin
 in rats and produce elevated serum bilirubin levels in  rabbits.  Both
 rats and rabbits were noted to have developed swelling  and granular
 dystrophy of the epithelium of the convoluted renal tubules, changes
 of the spermatogenic epithelium,  myocardial changes (rabbits), hyper-
volemia of the brain  (rats),  and hypervolemia and hemosiderosis  of  the
 spleen (both species)  (Gleiberman _et al.  1975).  The quantity and
 frequency of dosing and duration of the experiment were not given.

     DBP

     Bornmann jet _al.   (1956)  administered  260 mg/kg or 520 mg/kg DBP to
 rats twice weekly for 52 weeks.   They reported no adverse effects on
 fertility, hemato logical parameters,  or pathology as a result of this
 treatment.

     In another study, rats  fad  0.01,  0.05,  0.25,  or 1.25% DB? in the
diet for 12 months displayed  no  toxic af faces  axceoc at  the 1.25% level.

-------
   were not given.
                                           on
                                                               this group
              in mice reiving
orally for 1-3 months.      lng
                                   50
                                   3*°
                                                or
                                                     .5 g/kg/day of DBF
                                                                       and
  2000                           o
  produced testicular injur  and a 30 40?
  testes, but did not af fe^t the veJghts of
  with com oil controls.  In addition
  vhile testicular 2inc levels were
  studies with 400 mg/kg or 800
  Principle metabolite o'f DBF °
  reproducible vith MBP at half
  receing
  increased  liver weights with
                                              -lustration of
                                                     ratS f°r 4 davs
                                                      ** W6iSht °f the
                                                     * Or kidneys COmPared
                                                 "^ f cretion increased"
                                              decreased.   Subsequent

                                                           (MB?) '  the
                                                           -  f«««
                                                                that rats
                                                 °r 126° ffl8/k8/^y) had
      DNOP
nephritis  in all mice  and     ost  Ll
level with some evidence of  thll
level (Nagasaki et a!  !974)
                                                     °f DNOP
                                                      interstitial
                                              ratS at the 10°° m8/kg
                                              b°th sPecies « thl 500 mg/kg
 in
days/week over a 12-week perioVthaTit
They calculated the "chronic ip "
05.78 g/kg value calculated for

     3BF
                                                              more toxic
                                                          inJe"ions 5
                                                         acute
                                                    3'°2
in
inj<

-------
 twenty to  thirty mica.   BBP had no effect on final body weight or organ
 to  body weight  ratios  for  liver,  heart,  lungs,  kidneys, spleen, and
 testes.  Some pathological changes were  noted in the liver and spleen
 of  BBP-treated  mice, including  acute peritonitis,  periportal hepatitis
 in  the liver, and extra  medullary hematopoiesis in both the liver and
 spleen.  In  addition,  one  testis  was found to have an abscess resulting
 from  an unknown cause.
 E.2.5.3  Acute  Studies

     The acute  oral LD50 values for  the  individual  phthalate esters
 generally  range from 4 g/kg  to 34 g/kg for  rats, mice,  rabbits,  and
 guinea pigs.  A single study conducted with DEP, however,  reported an
 oral LD5o  value of 1 g/kg in the rabbit  (RTECS  1977).   A similar range
 of LD5Q values  has been observed in  rabbits and guinea  pigs  following
 dermal application of phthalate esters.  LD5Q values encountered in
 the literature  are listed in Table E-5.

     DEEP

     The oral toxicity of DEHP is of a low  order, with  LD5Q  values of
 31 g/kg for rats and 34 g/kg for rabbits (RTECS 1977).  Shaffer  et al.
 (1945) reported that a single oral dose of  79.5 g/kg DEHP  killed eight
 of ten rats.  Histological findings  included a  generalized cloudy
 swelling of the cells of the liver and kidneys  and granular  secretions
 in kidney  tubules.

     Although rabbits can absorb DEHP through the skin, doses as  high
 as 25 ml/kg are necessary to produce 50% lethality  (RTECS  1977).   Topic-
 ally applied, undiluted DEHP does not produce skin or eye  irritation  in
 rabbits (Fassett 1963).   Marked inflammation was noted  in  rabbits,
 however, following intradermal injection of 0.2 ml of a 100  mg/ml
 emulsion of DEHP in 37, acacia (Galley et_ al. 1966).

     In another study,  a total dose of 650 mg/kg of DEHP was admini-
 stered serially in 50 mg/kg aliquots to rabbits via heart  cannulation.
 Each 50 mg/kg dose produced a brief  (3-minute) decrease in blood  pres-
 sure, reducing  it to about 78% of baseline values.  A slight increase
 in respiratory rate was noted in conjunction with the change in blood
 pressure,  but no lasting untoward effects were produced (Galley  et al.
 1966).
     Three of five rats given 300 mg/kg DEHP intravenously in a  100%
 Tween 80:25% DMSO:65% normal saline vehicle became cyanotic  and died
 as a result of respiratory arrest within 90 minutes  (Schulz and Baetjer
 1974, Schulz et al.  1975).   Histopathological observation  of all  five
 animals revealed significant enlargement and hemorrhagic congestion of
 che lungs  with edematous swelling of the alveolar wall and infiltration
 of the lung tissue by poiymorphonuclear laukocytas.   Treatment of rats
wich che Tween  30-DMSO-saiine vehicle or emulsions of DEH? (500 mg/kg)
 in 3% acacia or 4" bovine serum albumin did aoc oroduca this reaction.
                                 1-26

-------
                   TABLE E-5.   ACUTE TOXICITY OF PKTHALATE ESTERS
DEEP
DMP
DE?
Species
Man
Rat
Rabbit

Guinea pig
Rat
Mouse
Rat
Rat
Guinea pig
Rabbit
Human
Rat
Mouse
Chicken
Rabbit
Cat
Mouse
Rat
Mouse
Mouse

Human
Rabbit
Guinea pig
Human
Mouse
Mouse
Mouse
Mouse
Rat
Rabbit
Route
oral
oral
oral

dermal
dermal
intraperitoneal
intraperitoneal
intravenous
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
dermal
inhalation
intraperitoneal
intraperitoneal
intraperitoneal
intraperitoneal

oral
oral
dermal
inhalation
intraperitoneal
intraperitor.eal
intraperi coneal
intraperitoneal
intraperi coneai
intravenous
LD,0 (g/kg)
0.143 (TDLo)1
31.0
34.0

•9.9 (10 ml/kg)2
24.7 (25 ml/kg)2
14.2
30.7
0.3 (LDLo)3
2.4
4.4
5.0 (LDLoJ3
6.9
7.2
8.5
11.9 (10 ml/kg?
1.0 g/m3 (LCLo)4
1.6
3.38
3.6
3.98

0.5 (LDLo)3
1.0
3.0
1.0 g/m3 4
2.75
2.3
2.33
3 . 22
5.06
0.1 (LDLo)3
Reference
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
Fishfaein and Albro
(1972)
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
Calley et al. ( 1966)
RTECS (1977)
• Fassett (1963)
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
Fassett (1963)
Fassett (1963)
RTECS (1977)
Fassett (1963)
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
Fassett (1963)
Lawrence et al.
(1975)
RTECS (1977)
Fassett (1963)
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
RTECS (1977)
Fassett (1963)
Calley _at al. (1966)
Lawrence at al. .,'137.
Singh e_t al. (1972s,
RTECS (1977)

-------
                  TABLE E-5.  ACUTE TOXICITY OF PHTHALATE ESTERS  (cont'd)
           Soecies
                   Route
DBF
Human
Human.
Rat
Mouse
Rabbit
Rat
Mouse
Mouse
Rat
    oral
    oral
    oral
    oral
   dermal
intraperitoneal
intrap eri toneal
intraperitoneal
 intramuscular
                        LD.Q (g/kg)
                                                                      Reference
  0.141
  5.0
  8.0 - 10.0
 16.6 (15.9 ml/kg)"
>20.9 (20 ml/kg)2
  3.05
  3.50
  4.0
 >8.0
RTECS (1977)
RTEC3 (1977)
Smith (1953)
Yamada (1974)
Lehman (1955)
Singh et al.  (1972)
Lawrence et  al.  (197
Galley et al.  (1966)
Smith  (19 53-)
BBP
Mouse
intraperitoneal
                                           3.16
                          Galley  et al.  (1966;
DNOP
Mouse
Guinea  pig
Mouse
Mouse
    oral          >13.0
   dermal         > 4.9 .
intraperitoneal    14.19"
intraperitoneal    65.7
                                                 (5.0 ml/kg)
                          Fassett (1963)
                          Fassett (1963)
                          Galley _et _al.  (1966
                          Lawrence et al.  (19
       Lowest published toxic dose.
      HDose reported in ml/kg - converted to g/kg using
       d = 0.9861 (DEHP), d » 1.0465 (DEP), d = 0.978  (DNOP),
       d - 1.189 (BMP.
       Lowest published lethal dose.
       Lowest published lethal concantration.
      "'The wide discrepancy in these values probably resulted
       because Galley's group injected the diester as  an emulsion
       in 3. 3% acacia vehicle, while Lawrence and coworksrs  used
       che undiluted compound.

-------

   and Bratt 1974).

        DMP
                                                                 (Daniel
   dose                                   s
   while "very large" doses were repored to
   general anesthesia. '           reported to
                                                           15 °inutes '
                                                    a SCate similar tQ
          eyes,
    irritation.

     DEP

of     __ c	_wc

rabbit P^ducerrtransient^ardecrJasfin^S011 ^  W anesthet-~-
dose compared with controls receiving         ?    Pressure  with  each
Administration of 100 mg/kg produced a 71 27 5*     ^^ had n° effact)
rate.  A total of 650 mg/kg of DEP wal llvl  ^ncr^ase ln  respiratory
significant effect                     81Ven tO the animal  without
                                                                »**
 3%
 tory response
 » J-
                      et al
                                                    a marked
 rats                                eD
 respectively).   Radeva  and  DiJoeva  Q966?
 tion,  immobility, difficult resplratio^
 in rats receiving a single  oral'dose  o^'

     Visceral tissues from  mic* -n-a"-^
undiluted DBF and killed 1   ? Y 7
iadistinguishable,  both gr^ss'iv Ind'
or control aniaals  injecrad vi^h a?-
(Lawrence  £t al.  19-5).           ai-
                                                     and  7
                                                                    of
                                                      "*
                                        ^«*.
                                        "C"P6rito«ally vlth 2.1 g/kg
                                                      ^^ ^
                                       r ,       '  "^ Che :issues
                                       cottonseed or aineral oil

-------
     Galley et 3.1.  (1966)  found a.  single  intradennal  injection of 0.2 ml
of a 100 mg/ml emulsion of DBF in  3% acacia  produced  a  moderate inflam-
matory response in  rabbits within  26 minutes  of  injection.   Lawrence et al.
(1975), on the other hand, noted no inflammation in rabbits  injected with
0.2 ml of undiluted DBF.   Instillation of 0.1 ml of the diester into Che
rabbit eye also did not produce any observable degree of irritation.

     3BF

     Intradermal injection of 0.2  ml of a 100 atg/ml emulsion of BBF  in
acacia into the backs of cleanly shaven rabbits  produced a moderate
inflammatory response within 26 minutes of injection  (Galley et al.
1966).  Timofievskaya _et al. (1974) reported  that BBP was not a skin
irritant; however,  the species tested, the dose,  and  the means of
administration were not stated.

     DNOP

     Lawrence et al. (1975) reported that DNOP did not  produce a response
of irritation when injected intradermally in  mice, nor when  instilled
directly into the eye (species and amount not given).

E.3  HUMAN EXPOSURE

     Few controlled studies have been conducted  on the direct  effect
of phthalate esters on humans.   Recent findings  that  phthalate plasti-
cizers leach from polyvinyl chloride blood bags  and other biomedical
devices have raised concerns regarding the safety of  phthalate esters
for humans.   Evidence of any in vivo toxicity in recipients  of blood
transfusions is lacking.  Rubin and Jaeger (1973), however,  note  that
microquantities of phthalate esters can increase platelet adhesiveness
and suggest that phthalate esters may be a factor in  the formation of
pulmonary emboli in the "shock lung syndrome" frequently seen  after
massive blood transfusions.  Because of the ubiquitous use of  phthalate
esters in our society,  however, the potential for human  exposure  to
phthalate esters is not limited to medical devices but may occur  from
ingestion, dermal contact, or inhalation.

2.3.1  Controlled Human Studies

E.3.1.1  OEHF

     No erythema or other reaction was noted  in a patch  test with
undiluted DEHP applied to the backs of twenty-three human volunteers
for 7 days and subsequently examined 10 days  later (Shaffer _et_ a_l. 1945).

E.3.1.2  DE?

     The lowest reported oral lethal dosa or  diechyi  phthalate in. humans
is 300 ag/kg (RTECS 197~). ^The lowest published ccxic concentration in
air for humans is 1000 -ag/m^ (RTSCS 197~).
                                 Z-30

-------
  E.3.1.3  DBF

 2.3.1.4  DM?
 DM? produces J painzTsenSi^if'££?! r*c Sr£V h^"S'
 -OU3 Cranes, but tt dees not ^P.1 SrSS^J:^^^ ^
 E.3.1.5 OOP
^«re^ed thirteen suwectr;er.":n::.:r.!^!'i,sub3e«s
Von Haam 1952).

E-3.2.  Epldemlologjcal
periods ranging t. 6 months  o 19 years' e1* (lnlxed."««)


                            2-31

-------
 reported in women occupationally exposed to phthalates.  Additional
 details were not readily available "(Aldyreva et_ al. 1975).

      The levels of phthalate esters in hviman tissues are summarized in
 Table E-6.   These data were gathered from people receiving variable
 exposures,  but  most are from the general population.

 E.4   IN VITRO STUDIES

 £.4.1  Biochemical Studies

      The jLn vitro respiration of rat liver mitochondria was not greatly
 affected by the presence of 1.0  mM DEHP,  DMP or DNOP (i.e., the uptake
 of 02 was within \IQZ  of that observed for controls.)   The same concen-
 tration of  DEP  or DBF  resulted in decreases in  02 uptake of 38 and 19%
 respectively (Takahashi 1977).

      In another study,  Bell et al.  (1978)  examined lipid and sterol bio-
 synthesis in livers  excised from rats  fed  DMP (0.5%), DBP (0.7%),  or DEHP
 (1.02)  in the diet  for  21 days.   14C-acetate incorporation into trigly-
 cerides, steryl ester and squalene  was  significantly reduced by DBF and
 DEHP.   DEHP-treatment caused  additional reductions in  14C-acetate
 incorporation into phospholipid  and sterol  (63%  and 71%,  respectively).
 Livers  from DMP-treated animals  showed  non-significant  increases  in
 14C-acetate incorporation into the  above-mentioned lipids  and sterols.

     Morton and Rubin  (1979)  found  that  ingestion of 50-2500 ing/kg of
 either  DEHP or  MEHP  in  the  diet  for 6 days  significantly  lowered  hepatic
 triglyceride accumulation in  animals subsequently fed 1%  orotic acid in
 the diet for 6  days  (species"  unspecified).   Concurrently,  they  found that
 the activities  of hepatic carnitine  acetyltransferase and  carnitine-
 palmitoyl transferase were  increased, as was  the 3-oxidation of lipids  in
 the liver.

     Ohyama  (1977) studied  the inhibitory effects  of phthalate  esters on
 a variety of enzymes.  He noted  that the activity  of glucose-6-phosphate
 dehydrogenase was decreased 50% by  8.1 x 10~% DEP,  1.8 x  10~4M DBP,
 1.6 x 10-% DNOP, and 2.2 x 10-% DEHP.

     Although binding has been reported between DEHP and  the  A  and  G
 fractions of rabbit blood in vitro  (loku e_t al.   1977),  Hafaennan and
 coworkers (1968) noted  that exposure to DEHP, DBP, or DNOP  did  not  affect
 the agglutinating capabilities of the blood grouping antibodies or  the
morphological integrity of human red blood cells.  DMP  (0.25  ml per 5 ml
 of human antisera) caused a destruction of human red blood  cell antibodies,

     Varying results have been raportad concerning the affect of  phthal-
 ate astar ? re treatment on barfaituata-inducad sleeping time.   Hidaka at_ al.
 (1977) raportad  that ?ratreatment of imnaturs famala mica orallv  vith
0.1-3.0 g/kg of  DEHP decreased hexcharbital-induced sleeping  time.
Danial and Sratt  (1974) noted similar results in mala and  famala  rat3

-------
                                     TABLE  E-6.  HUMAN TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS
           Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP)
1'ojHi 1 a t J on
Human
1'ost-moriein
saili)>l es
Post-mortem
samples
Infants
cat-hei Ized
with or
w i I limit a
-------
                                          TABLE E-6.  HUMAN TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS (Continue!)
   Chemical   Di£HP
I'l
I
Geographic
Population Region Tissue
Post-mortem Illinois,
samples Michigan,
Minnesota
Abd. fat
Axill. fat
Blood
Brain
Heart
Kidney
Liver
Lung
Omen. fat
Spleen
Number
Sampled
LAB I/
LAB 2
17/9
17/9
11/7
9/6
16/6
15/9
17/9
16/10
14/9
17/9
Distribution
LAB
M8/K
1.79
2
3
3
4
4
5
4
3
4
.52
.74
03
.08
.23
.11
.59
.44
.86
jh
±
±
±
±
J:
±
4-
±
±
±
I1
LAB 22
SD
1.8
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
3.
4.
5.
4.
7
95
04
06
9
99
54
16
85
l»g/g Hh SD
ft
19.85 ± 53.94
21
6
1
6
2
2
5
9
2
.51
.31
.45
.03
.24
.09
.97
.65
.36
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
60.16
11.98
3.55
14 . 58
3.25
3.92
10.82
21.28
3.12
Remarks Reference
Wallin et a I
(1974)
The wide discrepancy
in results between
• the two laboratories
seems to be primarily
attributable to the
very high values found
in one 64-year-old
patient with no history
• of blood transfusion,
included in the Lab 2
sampler
    ^1  was entered au 1.0 in calculation of means.



    'N«i  delectable" wab entered as 0 in calculation of means.

-------
                                         TABLE E-6.   HUMAN TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS  (Continued)
Chemical  DEilP
Geographic Number
Population Region Tissue Sampled
Post -mortem Baltimore, Lang
s.uuples Maryland Liver Sex
Spleen
Abdominal
fit •
H
M
M
M
iL M
M
M
M
M
F
F
M
Distribution

Units Blood Amt. DEHP^
Rec'd Rec'd (mg)
18 43.8
4 14.0
20 ? '
8 128.0
6 16.8
14 ?
4 22.5
?2 ?
? ?
31 ?
2 ?
13 ?
63 600.0


Lung
91.5
24.5
22.1
17.9
ND1
ND
21.2
20.8
13.4
ND
ND
—
ND
6M/1F not transfused none
Remarks'

Tissue Levels (pg/g)
Liver Spleen Abd.fat
69.5 25.3 — J
	 	 	
— — — — — _
ND
ND ND
ND ND ND
ND 5.0
NF>
ND
ND
ND ND
270.0
ND
ND
Reference
Jaeger and
Rubin (1972)
Not
          table  (<0.5 -  3  ug/g)
     known, l>nL multiple  transfusions  received.

 Not,
 Tbis waa calculated from the known storage time of each unit  and
 tlie previously calculated DEIII1 migration rate of 0.25 mg/100  ml/day.

-------
 Chemical   DEHP
                                          TABLE  E-6.   HUMAN  TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS (Continued)
Geographic
Population Region Tissue
llemodlalysis Cleveland, serum
Patients Ohio
y 50 dialysis treatments . • «

Adult males Ual t Imore, plasma
Mary 1 and
i
.j
h
Adult males Ualtimore, urine
Maryland


Number
Sampled Distribution Remarks Reference
ug/1 +• S.D. Serum sampled immedi- Lewis et al.
ately post-transfusion (1978)
, . 15 	 558 -f 221
. . 13 	 973 + 446

Immediately Patients transfused Rubin and
Pre-transfusion Post-transfusion with platelets Schiffer (1976)
6 200 |ig/l + 200 S.D. 6966.7 ug/1 + 1817.3 S.I).
2 Total DEHP 24-hour DEHP excretion in urine
received (mg) (mg DEHP and/or its metabolites) Rubin and
Schiffer (J'J76)
Pre-transfusion Post-transfusion
62.2 9.01 55.9 (90%)2
67.8 13.8 40.0 (60%)
 A 12-lumr t-ol lection (1250 ml urine).

t
 Number  iu parent lies is represents percent of total DEHP received (urine volumes not given).

-------
                                            TABLK  E-f>.   HUMAN  TISSUE  CONCENTRATIONS  (Continued)
    Chemical      Dl-n-butyl phthalate (DBF)
               Geographic
  Population   	Region


Poat-iiiurtem   Canada
  Post-mortem   Canada
                                           Number
                                Tissue     Sampled
                              Adipose
                              Adipose
                                           44
                                                                                             Remarks
                                                          0.0  -  1.0
                                                          0 52  0  70
                                                          0.52-0.79
                                                                                                                p«fprpnrr
                                                                                                              Mas et al.
                                                                                                              (iy/6)
                                                                                                                      Campbell
i
I..J

-------
 given^a single 500 mg/kg oral dose of DEEP, but reported an increase in
 sleeping time when the diester was administered intravenously  (600 mg/kg).
 Similar increments in sleeping time following intraperitoneal or intra-
 venous  pretreatment with phthalate esters have been reported by
 Swinyard at. al.  (1976),  Rubin and Jaeger (1973), Galley et al/ (1966),
 and Seth _et aJL.  (1976).   Lawrence and coworkers (1975) reported signifi-
 cant increases in pentobarbital-induced sleeping time in male mice
 pretreated with  three intraperitoneal injections (7.5 g/kg/day) of
 either  DEEP or DNOP but  no significant effects in mice pretreated with
 DMP,  DEP,  or DBF.

 E.4.2  Tissue Culture Studies

      Several studies  have been conducted concerning the toxicity of the
 phthalate esters  to cultured  cells.   Galley et al.  (1966)  saturated
 porous  pads with  0.05 ml of a 50  mg/ml emulsion of  DBP, DMP,  DEHP,  DEP,
 or  BBP  in 3% acacia,  then placed  the  pads  directly  on agar supporting
 the  growth of either  chick embryo cells  or  mouse L929 fibroblasts.   None
 of  the  esters produced toxic  effects  in  chick  embryo  cells but  DMP,  DEP,
 and  BBP all showed  toxicity to  mouse  fibroblasts.

      Lee _e_t al.  (1974b)  found that  aortic  cells  from  9-day chick  embryos
 exposed in culture  to 0.05 mg/ml  of DEHP or 0.1  mg/ml of DMP  for  10  hours
 developed  cytoplasmic vacuoles  and  began to retract their  protoplasmic
 processes.   (The normal  "spindle"  shape of  cultured aortic  cells  is
 conferred  fay  these  processes.)  DMP,  at concentrations  of  0.6 mg/ml  or
 greater,  resulted in  extensive  cell death within 12 hours.

      Kasuya (1974,  1976)  found  that fibroblast-growth  and  the outgrowth
 of nerve  fibers from  cultured rat  cerebellar tissue were inhibited by
 DNOP, DMP,  DBP, and DEP  at concentrations of 0.13, 0.31, 0.78,  and 0.51 mM,
 respectively.

      Jones Jit al. (1975) determined the concentration  of DBP, DNOP,  and
 DEHP  necessary to produce a 50% growth inhibition of human WI-38 fibro-
 blasts.   The LD50 values were 135, 170, and 70 uM for DBP, DNOP, and
 DEHP, respectively.

      In a more extensive investigation of the specific  effects of DEHP
 on WI-38 cells, Jones et al.   (1975) found that a concentration of 160 uM
 of DEHP in  the culture medium caused a decreased cell density within 6
days, and a cessation of cell viability after 9 days of exposure.  Cells
grown in 160 uM DEHP  for 3 days and then replated in untreated  (control)
medium for 5 days showed only 60£ of control growth (as measured by cell
protein concentration).  Concentrations of 51 or 69 uM DEHP produced
dose-related decreases in cell protein and longer generation times, but
 the cells remained viable at 9 days.

     Contrary to  the findings  of Jones e_t al. (1975) ,  Jacofason e_t al.
 (1974) found chat inhibition of human diploid fibroblasts by DEHP was
reversible.  They grew fibroblasts cultured from human skin biousies in
                                  Z-38

-------
untrel H C°"cen"atl?n ot D£H? for 6 days, then refed  the cells with

          ***   * ' *                            wich
on day  0
tL iL I!' J        Sirth WaS measured in terms of incorporation of
the labelled ammo acid into cell proteins.  DEHP-exposed cells incor-

porate^ 320% more 3H-thymidine than cells grown in control med^ for
                               E-39

-------