vvEPA
                United States
                Environmental Protection
                Agency
                Office of Water
                Regulations anJ Standards
                Criteria and Standards Division
                Washington DC 2046C
  440 5-80 051
October 1980
Ambient
Water Quality
Criteria for
Halomethanes

-------
     AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR

                HALOMETHANES
                 Prepared  By
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 Office of Water Regulations  and  Standards
      Criteria and  Standards Division
             Washington, D.C.

     Office of Research and Development
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
              Cincinnati,  Ohio

        Carcinogen  Assessment Group
             Washington, D.C.

    Environmental  Research Laboratories
             Corvalis, Oregon
             Duluth,  Minnesota
            Gulf Breeze, Florida
         Narragansett, Rhode Island

-------
                              DISCLAIMER
     This  report  has  been reviewed by  the  Environmental  Criteria and
Assessment Office,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  and approved
for publication.  Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                          AVAILABILITY  NOTICE
      This  document is available  to  the public  through  the National
Technical Information Service, (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                FOREUORD

     Section  304 (a)(l) of the  Clean  Water  Act of 1977  (P.L. 95-217),
 requires  the Administrator of  the  Environmental  Protection Agency  to
 publish  criteria for  water  quality  accurately  reflecting the  latest
 scientific knowledge on the kind and extent  of  all  identifiable effects
 on  health  and  welfare  which  may  be expected  from the  presence  of
 pollutants in any body of water, including ground water.   Proposed water
 quality criteria  for  the  65  toxic pollutants listed under  section 307
 (a)(l)  of the  Clean  Water Act were  developed  and a notice  of their
 availability was  published for  public comment on March  15,  1979  (44  FR
 15926), July 25, 1979  (44 FR  43660), and  October  1, 1979  (44 FR 56628).
 This  document  is a revision  of those proposed  criteria based upon  a
 consideration of  comments  received  from  other  Federal  Agencies, State
 agencies,  special  interest  groups,  and  individual  scientists.   The
 criteria contained in  this  document replace any  previously published EPA
 criteria  for the 65  pollutants.    This criterion  document  is also
 published in satisifaction of paragraph  11 of the  Settlement Agreement
 in  Natural  Resources   Defense  Council,  et.  al.  vs.  Train, 8 ERC 2120
 (D.D.C. 1976J,  modified, 12 ERC 1833  (D.D.C. 1979).

     The term "water quality criteria" is used  in  two  sections of the
 Clean Water Act, section 304 (a}(l) and section 303  (c)(2).  The term has
'a different  program impact in each  section.   In section  304, the term
 represents  a non-regulatory,  scientific assessment  of  ecological  ef-
 fects. The  criteria presented in  this publication are such scientific
 assessments.    Such water  quality  criteria associated  with  specific
 stream uses when adopted as State  water quality  standards  under section
 303  become  enforceable maximum acceptable  levels  of   a  pollutant   in
 ambient waters.   The water quality  criteria adopted in  the  State water
 quality standards could have the same numerical  limits  as  the criteria
 developed under section 304.  However, in  many situations States may want
 to adjust water quality criteria developed under  section  304 to reflect
 local  environmental  conditions  and  human  exposure patterns  before
 incorporation into  water  quality  standards.    It  is not  until  their
 adoption  as  part of the State water  quality  standards that  the criteria
 become regulatory.

     Guidelines  to assist  the  States in the modification of criteria
 presented  in this  document,   in  the  development  of  water  quality
 standards, and in other water-related  programs of this Agency, are being
 developed by  EPA.
                                    STEVEN SCHATZOW
                                    Deputy Assistant Administrator
                                    Office of Water Regulations and Standards
                                     111

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


Aquatic Life Toxicology:

   William A. Brungs, ERL-Narragansett       John H. Gentile, ERL-Narragansett
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


Mammalian Toxicology and Human Health Effects:

   Joseph Santodonato                        Julian Andelman
   Syracuse Research Corporation             University of Pittsburgh

   Michael Dourson  (doc. mgr.) ECAQ-Cin      Jacqueline V. Carr
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

   Jerry F. Stara  (doc. mgr.) ECAO-Cin       Patrick Durkin
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency      Syracuse Research Corporation

   Terri Laird, ECAO-Cin                     Si Duk Lee, ECAO-Cin
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

   Steven D. Lutkenhoff, ECAO-Cin            Yin-Tak Woo
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

   Sorrel! Schwartz                          Roy E.  Albert*
   Georgetown University                     Carcinogen Assessment Group
                                             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


Technical  Support Services Staff:  D.J.  Reisman, M.A.  Garlough, B.L. Zwayer,
P.A.  Daunt,  K.S. Edwards,  T.A. Scandura,  A.T. Pressley,  C.A."Cooper,
M.M.  Denessen.

Clerical Staff:   C.A.  Haynes,  S.J.  Faehr, L.A.  Wade, D.  Jones, B.J.  Bordicks,
B.J.  Quesnell.,  T. Highland, B. Gardiner.
*CAG Participating Members:
   Elizabeth L. Anderson, Larry Anderson, Dolph Arnicar, Steven Bayard,
   David L. Bayliss, Chao W. Chen, John R. Fowls III, Bernard Haberman,
   Charalingayya Hiremath, Chang S. Lao, Robert McGaughy, Jeffrey Rosen-
   blatt, Dharm V. Singh, and Todd W. Thorslund.

-------
                            TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
Criteria Summary

Introduction                                                       A-l

Aquatic Life Toxicology                                            B-l
      Introduction                                                  8-1
      Effects                                                       B-l
          Acute Toxicity                                           8-1
          Chronic Toxicity                                         8-2
          Plant Effects                                            B-3
          Residues                                                 B-3
          Summary                                                  B-3
      Criteria                                                      B-4
      References                                                    B-9

Mammalian Toxicology and Human Health  Effects                      C-l
      Introduction                                                  C-l
      Exposure                                                      C-3
          Ingestion from Water                                     C-3
          Ingestion from Food                                      C-9
          Inhalation                                               C-13
          Dermal                                                   C-20
      Pharmacokinetics                                              C-21
          Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism  and  Excretion       C-21
      Effects                                                       C-28
          Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Toxicity                   C-28
          Synergism and/or Antagonism                              C-56
          Teratogenicity                                           C-56
          Mutagenicity                                             C-57
          Carcinogenicity                                          C-59
      Criterion Formulation                                         C-66
          Existing Guidelines and Standards                        C-66
          Special Groups at Risk                                   C-70
          Basis and Derivation of Criteria                         C-71
      References                                                    C-79
Appendix                                                           C-110

-------
                        CRITERIA DOCUMENT



                           HALOMETHANES



CRITERIA



                           Aquatic  Life



     The available  data  for halomethanes indicate  that  acute  tox-



icity to freshwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as low  as



11,000  ug/1  and  would occur at lower  concentrations among  species



that are more  sensitive  than those tested.   No data are  available



concerning the chronic toxicity of  halomethanes to sensitive fresh-



water aquatic  life.



     The available  data  for halomethanes  indicate that  acute and



chronic toxicity to saltwater aquatic  life occur  at concentrations



as low  as  12,000  and  6,400 ug/1,  respectively, and would occur  at



lower concentrations  among  species  that are  more sensitive  than



those tested.  A  decrease  in algal cell numbers  occurs  at  concen-



trations as low as 11,500  yg/1.







                           Human Health



     For the maximum protection of human health from the  potential



carcinogenic  effects   due   to  exposure  of   chloromethane,   bromo-



methane,  dichloromethane,   bromodichloromethane,   tribromomethane,



dichlorodifluoromethane,  trichlorofluoromethane,  or combinations  of



these chemicals through ingestion of contaminated  water  and  contam-



inated aquatic organisms,  the ambient water concentration should  be



zero based on the non-threshold assumption  for this chemical.  How-



ever, zero level  may not  be attainable  at the present time.   There-



fore, the levels  which may  result in incremental  increase of cancer





                                vi

-------
risk over the  lifetime  are  estimated at 10~ , 10~   and  10"  .   The
corresponding  recommended  criteria  are  1.9 ,ug/l,  0.19  ,ug/l,  and
0.019 ^ig/1,  respectively.  If the above estimates are made for con-
sumption of  aquatic organisms only,  excluding consumption of  water,
the levels are 157 ug/1, 15.7 jug/1,  and  1.57 jug/1,  respectively.
                                 VII

-------
                           INTRODUCTION


     The  halomethanes  are  a  subcategory  of  halogenated  hydro-


carbons.    This  document   reviews   the  following   halomethanes:


chloromethane, bromomethane,  methylene chloride,  bromoform,  bromo-


dichloromethane,   trichlorofluoromethane,   and   dichlorodifluoro-


methane.


     Methyl  chloride  is  also  known as  chloromethane  (Windholz,


1976).   It  is  a  colorless,  flammable, almost odorless gas at  room


temperature and pressure.  It is used as  a refrigerant,  a methylat-


ing  agent,  a dewaxing  agent, and catalytic  solvent in synthetic


rubber  production  (MacDonald, 1964).  Methyl bromide has  been  re-

                                                                 (B\
ferred   to   as   bromomethane,  monobromomethane,   and   Embaf ume vsy


(Windholz,  1976).    It  has  been  widely  used as  a fumigant,  fire


extinguisher,   refrigerant,   and    insecticide   (Kantarjian   and


Shaheen,  1963).   Today  the  major use of methyl  bromide  is as  a


fumigating  agent,  and  this  use has  caused  sporadic outbreaks of


serious human poisoning.


     Methylene chloride has  been  referred  to as  dichloromethane,


methylene dichloride,  and methylene  bichloride  (Windholz,  1976).


It  is  a  common  industrial  solvent   found  in insecticides,  metal


cleaners, paints,  and  paint and varnish removers (Balmer, et  al.


1976).    In  1976,  244,129 metric  tons (538,304,000 Ibs) were pro-


duced  in  the  United  States with an  additional  19,128 metric tons


(42,177,000 Ibs) imported (U.S. EPA,  1977a).


     Trichlorofluoromethane  is  also  known  as trichloromonofluoro-

                                              (9\            /S}
methane,  fluorotr ichloromethane,  Frigen 11 ^   Freon   11^,   and
                               A-l

-------
 Arcton 9   .   Dichlorodifluoromethane has been referred to as  di-

                                  Mfl              (Tfl             TJ
fluorodichloromethane,  Freon   12   ,   Frigen  12 **,  Arcton  6   ,


Genetron 12   ,  Halon ®,  and  Isotron 2  .   Freon compounds are  or-


ganic compounds which  contain  fluorine.   They have many desirable


characteristics which  include  a high degree of chemical stability


and relatively low toxicity,  and they are  nonflammable.  Freon com-


pounds have found  many applications ranging from use as propellants


to refrigerants and solvents (Van Auken, et  al. 1975).


     Bromoform  is  also known as tribromomethane  (Windholz, 1976).


It  is  used in  pharmaceutical  manufacturing,  as  an ingredient in


fire  resistant  chemicals  and  gauge  fluid,  and as  a  solvent  for


waxes, grease, and oils (U.S. EPA,  1975a).  Bromodichloromethane is


used as a  reagent  in research  (National Academy of  Sciences (NAS),


1978).


     The physical characteristics of the halomethanes are listed in


Table  1.   Monohalomethanes  can be  hydrolyzed slowly  in  neutral


waters forming methanol and hydrogen halides.  The  rate of hydroly-


sis  increases with size  of the halogen moiety (Boggs  and  Mosher,


1960).  Zafiriou  (1975) has  indicated that in  seawater iodomethane


can react with chloride ion to yield chloromethane, and this reac-


tion occurs as fast as the exchange of  iodomethane  into the atmos-


phere (exchange rate,  4 x 10~ /sec).  The monohalomethanes are  not


oxidized readily  under ordinary conditions.   Bromomethane  at 14.5


percent concentrations in  air and  intense  heat  will  produce a flame


(Stenger and  Atchison,  1964).   Chloromethane in  contact  with a


flame  will burn,   producing  C02  and HC1  (Hardie,  1964).    Mono-


halomethanes  undergo  photolysis   in  the  upper  atmosphere  where
                               A-2

-------
                                                             TABLE  1

                                             Physical Characteristics of llalomethanes
Molecular
Compound weight
chloromethane 50.49
hromome thane 94.94
J ichloromethane 84.93
tr ichloiof luoro- 137.37
methane
dichlorodif luoro- 120.91
methane
tr ibf omomethane 252.75
btomod ichloro- 163.83
methane
Physical state mp. a bp. a Specific Vapor Solubility
under ambient ,0,,. .oc gravity pressure in water
conditions (mm tig) (ug/1)
colorless gas -97.73 -24.2 0. 973 (-10°C)b 5.38xl06
colorless gas -93.6 3.56 1. 737 (-lO°C)b IxlO6
colorless liquid -95.1 40 1.327(20°C)a 362.4(20°C)C 13.2xl06 °
<25°C)
colorless liquid -11) 23.82 1.467(25°C)a 667.4(20°C)C l.lxlO6 °
(20°C)
colorless gas -158 -29.79 i. 75<-ll5°C)a 4(306(20°C)C 2.8.105 C
(25°C)
colorless liquid 8.3 149.5 2.890(20°C)a slightly
sol.3
colorless liquid -57.1 90 1.980{20°C) insoluble*
Solubility
in organic
solvents
alcohol, ether
acetone, benzene,
chloroform,
acetic acid
alcohol, etber,
acetic acid
alcohol, ether3
alcohol, ether
alcohol, ethera
alcohol, ether,
benzene, chloro-
form, ligroin
alcohol, ether,
acetone, benzene,
chloroform
a) Weast, 1972
b) U.S. EPA, I977b
c) Pearson and McConnell,  1975
(1) VJindholz, 1976
                                                   A-3

-------
ultraviolet  radiation  is  of sufficient energy to  initiate  a  reac-



tion (Basak, 1973).



     Prolonged  heating  of dichloromethane with water at  180°C  re-



sults in  the formation  of formic acid, methyl chloride,  methanol,



hydrochloric acid  and some  carbon monoxide.   In contact with  water



at elevated  temperatures, methylene chloride  corrodes  iron,  some



stainless steels,  copper, and  nickel (Hardie,  1964).



     Trichlorofluoromethane  is  nonflammable.     Decomposition  of



tribroraomethane  is accelerated by air  and  light (Windholz,  1976).



     Methylene  chloride is a  major  halogenated  pollutant  with  a



large potential  for delivery of  chlorine  to  the stratosphere.   The



photooxidation of the compound  in the troposphere  probably proceeds



with a half-life of  several months,  similar to the case  of methyl



chloride.  The  principal oxidation product of methylene chloride is



phosgene which  results from the two  hydrogens being abstracted from



the molecule.   It  is  conceivable that  this phosgene may  be photo-



lyzed  to  yield  chlorine  atoms  in  the  ozone-rich region  of  the



stratosphere.   It thus appears  that  there  is  some potential  for



ozone destruction  by methylene chloride since  the  generated chlor-



ine atoms will  attack ozone (U.S. EPA, 1975b).



     Similarly,  fully halogenated  substances such  as  trichloro-



fluoromethane  and  dichlorodifluoromethane migrate  to  the  strato-



sphere where  they are  photodissociated,   adversely affecting  the



ozone balance  (U.S. EPA, 1975b).



     There are  few data in  the literature  relating  to the environ-



mental fate  or degradation of  bromodichloromethane and  tribromo-



methane.
                               A-4

-------
                          REFERENCES







Balmer,  M.F.,  et al.   1976.   Effects  in the  liver  of methylene



chloride  inhaled  alone and  with  ethyl alcohol.   Am.  Ind.   Hyg.



Assoc. Jour.  37: 345.







Basak, A.K.   1973.    The  photolytic decomposition of methyl chlo-



ride.  Jour. Ind. Chem. Soc.  50: 767.








Boggs, J.E.  and H.P.  Mosher.   1960.  Effect  of fluorine substi-



tution on the   rate  of hydrolysis  of  chloromethane.    Jour.   Am.



Chem. Soc.  82: 3517.







Hardie,  D.W.F.   1964.  Methyl chloride.   Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia



of Chemical Technology. 2nd  ed.  Interscience Publishers, New York.







Kantarjian, A.D. and  A.S. Shaheen.   1963.   Methyl bromide poison-



ing with  nervous system manifestations resembling polyneuropathy.



Neurology.  13: 1054.







MacDonald,  J.D.C.   1964.    Methyl  chloride  intoxication.    Jour.



Occup.  Med. 6: 81.








National  Academy of  Sciences.   1978.  Nonfluorinated halomethanes



in the environment.   Washington, D.C.
                               A-5

-------
Pearson,  C.R.  and  G.  McConnell.   1975.   Chlorinated  Cl  and C2



hydrocarbons in  the marine  environment.   Proc.  R.  Soc.  London B.



189: 305.







Stenger,  V.A.  and G.J.  Atchison.   1964.  Methyl  bromide.   Kirk-



Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical  Technology.  2nd ed,    Interscience



Publishers, New  York.







U.S. EPA.  1975a.   Initial  scientific and minieconomic  review of



folpet.  Draft.  Rep. Off. Pestic. Prog. Washington, D.C.







U.S. EPA.  1975b.  Report on the problem of halogenated  air pollu-



tants and stratospheric ozone.  EPA 600/9-75-008. Washington, D.C.







U.S. EPA.   1977a.   Area 1. Task  2.  Determination of sources of



selected chemicals in waters and  amounts  from  these sources.  Draft



final rep. Contract No. 68-01-3852. Washington, D.C.








U.S. EPA.  1977b.  Investigation of selected potential environmen-



tal contaminants.   Monohalomethanes.   EPA 560/2-77-007.   Washing-



ton, D.C.







Van Auken, et al.  1975.  Comparison of the  effects of  three fluoro-



carbons on certain bacteria.  Can.  Jour.  Microbiol.    21: 221.







Weast,  R.C., (ed.)  1972.  Handbook of Chemistry and  Physics.  CRC



Press,  Cleveland, Ohio.
                               A-6

-------
Windholz, M., (ed.)  1976.  The Merck Index.  Merck and  Co., Rahway,



New Jersey.







Zafiriou, O.C.  1975.  Reaction of methyl  halides  with  seawater and



marine aerosols.  Jour. Mar.  Res.  33: 75.
                               A-7

-------
Aquatic Life Toxicology*
                                 INTRODUCTION
    Although the  aouatic  toxicity  data base for  halomethanes  is  limited, it
allows  some generalizations  concerning  trends  within  the  class.    Data  on
chloroform  and  carbon  tetrachloride  are  included  for discussion  and are also
treated  in  separate criterion  documents.   Methylene chloride, methyl  chlo-
ride,  bromoform,   and  methyl  bromide  are  the only  other  halomethanes  for
which appropriate data are available.
                                    EFFECTS
Acute Toxicity
    The  48-hour  EC5Q  values  for   Daphnia  magna  are  224,000,  28,900,  and
35,200  ug/1 for  methylene  chloride  (Table  1),  chloroform,  and  carbon  te-
trachloride,  respectively  (U.S.   EPA,  1978).   The  result  with  chloroform
(28,900  ug/1)   does  not  support   any  conclusion  about  the correlation  of
toxicity  and  amount of chlorination for the  data with  Daphnia magna.   For
bromoform and  methylene  chloride,  there appears  to be little dif  erence in
sensitivity  between Daphnia  magna  and  the  bluegill.   The  LC-.  and  EC™
values  for  each  species  are both   224,000  ug/1  for  methylene chloride  and
29,300 and 46,500 ug/1, respectively, for bromoform.
    Apparently, the  brominated compounds  are  more  toxic  to fishes than  the
chlorinated analogs  (Table  1).   The  96-hour  LCcn  values  for bluegill  are
11,000   and  550,000  ug/1   for   methyl   bromide   and   methyl   chloride,
respectively,  under  static  test conditions  (Dawson, et al.   1977). For  bro-
*ThereaderTsreferred  to  the  Guidelines  for  Deriving  Water  Quality
Criteria for the Protection of Aauatic  Life  and  Its Uses in order  to better
understand  the  following  discussion  and  recommendation.    The  following
tables contain  the  appropriate  data that were found  in the literature,  and
at the  bottom  of each  table  are  calculations for  deriving  various measures
of toxicity as  described in the  Guidelines.
                                     8-1

-------
moform  and chloroform  the 96-hour  |_C5Q values  are  29,300 ug/1  (U.S.  EPA,
1978)  and  115,000 ug/1  to  100,000  ug/1, respectively.  The data  from acute
static  tests  with bluegill  show a correlation  between  increasing chlorina-
tion  and  toxicity.   The  96-hour  LC5Q  values  are  550,000 ug/1  (Dawson,  et
a!.  1977)  for  methyl  chloride,  224,000 ug/1  for  methylene  chloride (U.S.
EPA,  1978),  100,000  to   115,000  ug/1   for  chloroform,  and  125,000  ug/1
(Oawson, et al.  1977) and  27,300 ug/1  (U.S.  EPA, 1978) for carbon tetrachlo-
ride.   Alexander,  et al.  (1978) compared the  effect of  test  procedures  on
the toxicity  of methylene  chloride to the fathead  minnow.  The flow-through
test  result  was  193,000  ug/1 and  the  static  test  result was  310,000  wg/l
(Table  1).
    The mysid  shrimp has  been tested  with bromoform  and  methylene chloride
(U.S.  EPA,  1978) and the  96-hour LC5Q  values  are  24,400 and  256,000 ug/l,
respectively (Table  1).
    Apparently,  the  brominated  compounds are more  toxic to fishes  than  the
chlorinated analogs, as is  true  for  the freshwater fish  (Table  1).   The
96-hour LC50  values  for   the  tidewater  silverside   (Oawson,  et  al.   1977)
and methyl  bromide  and  methyl   chloride are  12,000  and  270,000  ug/1,  re-
spectively.
Chronic Toxicity
    No  life cycle or embryo-larval tests have  been  conducted with freshwater
organisms   and  any halomethane other  than chloroform and carbon  tetrachlo-
ride.    In  those  tests,  the  concentration at  which   no  adverse  effects  of
chloroform were observed for Daphnia magna was  between  1,800 and  3,600 ug/'»
and no  adverse effects of  carbon tetrachloride  on  the fathead  minnow  were
observed at the  highest test  concentration of 3,400  ug/1.  Details of these
                                     B-2

-------
 tests may  be  found  in  the  criterion documents for those chemicals.
    An  embryo-larval  test  has been conducted with  the sheepshead minnow and
 bromoform  (U.S.  EPA,  1978)  and  the chronic value  derived  from this test is
 6,400  ug/1 (Table  2).   This result  and  the 96-hour  LC5Q  (Table 1) provide
 an  acute-chronic ratio of  2.8  which  indicates that  the  differences between
 acute lethality  and other  chronic effects is small.
 Plant Effects
    The  96-hour EC™  values  for bromoform  (Table  3), based  on chlorophyll
 £ and  cell numbers  of the  freshwater  alga, Selenastrum  capricornutum,  are
 112,000  and 116,000  ug/1,  respectively.   The same tests with methylene chlo-
 ride  showed  the EC™  values  were  above  the  highest test  concentration,
 662,000  ug/1  (U.S. EPA, 1978).
    The  96-hour EC^Q  values  for bromoform  (Table  3), based  on chlorophyll
 a_ and cell numbers  of the saltwater  alga,  Skeletonema costatum,  are 12,300
 and  11,500  ug/1,   respectively.   The  same  tests  with  methylene  chloride
 showed  the EC™ values were above the  highest test  concentration,  662,000
 ug/1 (U.S. EPA,  1978).
 Residues
    No residue data for freshwater  fish  are  available for  halomethanes other
 than for chloroform and carbon tetrachloride, for  which the bioconcentration
 factors  (U.S. EPA,  1978)   were  6  and  30,   respectively.   Details  of  these
 tests may  be found in the criterion documents for those chemicals.
 Summary
    Among  the  halomethanes tested with  freshwater  organisms,  toxicity varied
widely with,  in  general,   an  increase  in toxicity  with degree  of  chlorina-
 tion.    Where   comparable   data  exist,  the   brominated compounds  were  more
                                     B-3

-------
toxic  than  the  chlorinated  analogs.   The  cladoceran,  Daphnia magna,  was
about  as  sensitive  as  the  tested  fish  species.   Overall,  the  LCcr,  and
EC5Q  values  for  these species  and  the various tested  halofonns ranged from
11,000  to  550,000  ug/l.   No  data  are  available  to  estimate  chronic  tox-
icity.   The  96-hour  EC™ values  for  the  alga,   Selenastrum capricornutum,
for  bromoform  and  methylene  chloride  ranged  from  112,000  to  greater  than
662,000 ug/l.
    The brominated  compounds  were more  toxic  to  the three  tested  saltwater
species than  the chlorinated  analogs.   The  mysid  shrimp was  similarly sen-
sitive to  the sheepshead minnow  to  bromoform and methylene  chloride with the
LC50  and   £C50  values in  the  range  of 17,900  to  331,000  ug/l.  When  the
acute and  chronic  test  results for the sheepshead minnow and  bromoform are
compared,  the numerical relationship  is 2.8.   The  highest observed  no-effect
level  was  4,800 ug/l  and  the  96-hour LC5Q value  was 17,900 ug/l.  The
96-hour  EC-0 values  for  the  alga,  Skeletonema costatum for  bromoform  and
methylene chloride ranged from 11,500 to greater than 662,000 ug/l.
                                   CRITERIA
    The  available  data  for   halomethanes  indicate  that acute  toxicity  to
freshwater aquatic  life  occurs at  concentrations  as low as  11,000  ug/l  and
would occur  at   lower concentrations  among  species  that are more  sensitive
than those tested.  No data are  available  concerning the chronic toxicity of
halomethanes  to  sensitive freshwater aquatic life.
    The  available  data  for   halomethanes  indicate  that acute  and  chronic
toxicity to saltwater aquatic  life  occur at concentrations  as  low  as  12,000
and 6,400  ug/l,  respectively,  and  would occur at  lower  concentrations  among
species that  are  more sensitive than  those tested.   A decrease  in algal  cell
numbers occurs at concentrations as low as  11,500  ug/l.
                                     B-4

-------
Table 1.  Acute values for halowethanes
Species Method*
Chemical
LC50/EC50

Species Acute
Value (ug/l) Reference
FRESHWATER SPECIES
Cladoceran, S, U
Daphnla magno
C ladoceran, S, U
Daphnla maqna
Fathead minnow, FT, M
Plmephales promelas
Fathead minnow, S, U
Plmephales promelas
Blueglll, S, U
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll, S, U
Lepomls macrochlrus
Blueglll, S, U
Lepomis macrochlrus
Bluegl II, S, U
Lepomis macrochlrus
Mysld shrimp, S, U
Mysidopsls bah la
Mysld shrimp, S, U
Mysidopsls bah la
Sheepshead minnow, S, U
Cyprlnodon varlegatus
Sheepshead minnow, S, U
Cyprlnodon varlegatus
bromoform
methyl ene
chloride
methy lene
ch lorlde
methy lene
chloride
bromoform
methy lene
chloride
methy 1
ch lorlde
methy 1
bromide
SALTWATER
bromoform
methy lene
ch lorlde
bromoform
methy lene
chloride
46,500
224,000
193,000
310,000
29,300
224,000
550,000
11,000
SPECIES
24,400
256,000
17,900
331,000
46,500 U.S. EPA, 1978
224,000 U.S. EPA, 1978
Alexander, ef al. 1978
193,000 Alexander, et al. 1978
29,300 U.S. EPA, 1978
224,000 U.S. EPA. 1978
550,000 Dawson, et al. 1977
11,000 Dawson, et al. 1977
24.400 U.S. EPA, 1978
256,000 U.S. EPA, 1978
17,900 U.S. EPA, 1978
331,000 U.S. EPA, 1978
                      B-5

-------
Table 1.  (Continued)
Species Method*
Tidewater sllverslde, S, U
Menldla beryl 1 Ina
Tidewater sllverslde, S. U
Menldla beryl 1 ina

Che»lcal
methyl
bromide
methyl
ch lor Ide
LC50/EC50 Spec las Acute
<)ig/l) Value (ug/l) Reference
12,000 12,000 Dawson, et al. 1977
270,000 270,000 Oawson, et al. 1977
* S = static,  FT = t low-through,  U =  unmeasured, M  = measured



  No Final Acute Values are calculable since  the minimum  data  base requirements are not met.
                                    B-6

-------
         Table 2.   Chronic  values  for kaloMthanes  (U.S. EPA. 1978)
Species
Sheepshead minnow,
Cyprlnodon varlegatus
Method* Choalcal
SALTWATER SPECIES
E-L bromoform
Ll-lts
Cyg/l)
4.800-
8,500
Chronic
Value
(U9/I)
6,400
* E-L • embryo-larva I
   Sheepshead minnow,
   Cyprlnodon varlegatus
                               Acute-Chronic Ratio
Chemical

bromoform
                                               Chronic
                                                Value
                                                (ua/D
6,400
           Acute
           Value
           (ug/1)     Ratio
17,900
2.8
                                    B-7

-------
Table 3.  Plant values for ha I (methanes (U.S.  EPA,  1978)
Alga,
Sel eras t rum capr 1 cornutum
Alga,
Selenastrum capr I cornutum
Alga,
Selenastrum capr 1 cornutum
Alga,
Selenastrum capr 1 cornutum
Alga,
Skeletonenia cost a turn
Alga,
Skeletonema costatum
Alga,
Skeletonema costatum
Alga,
Skeletonema costatum
Chemical
FRESHWATER SPECIES
bromoform
bromoform
methyl en e
chloride
methy lene
chloride
SALTWATER SPECIES
bromoform
bromotorm
me thy lene
ch lor Ida
met hy lene
chloride
Effect
Ch lorophy 1 1 a
96- hr EC50
Cel 1 number
96-hr EC50
Ch lorophy 1 1 a
96-hr EC50
Cel 1 number
96- hr EC50
Ch lorophy 1 1 a
96-hr £C50
Cel 1 number
96- hr EC50
Chlorophyl 1 a
96-hr EC50
Cel 1 number
96- hr EC50
Result
(ug/1)
112,000
1 16 ,000
>662,000
>662.000
12,300
I) , 500
>662,000
>662,000
                         B-8

-------
                                  REFERENCES

Alexander,  H.C.,  et  al.  1978.   Toxicity  of  perchloroethylene,  trichloro-
ethylene,  1,1,1-trichloroethane,  and  methylene chloride to  fathead minnows.
Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.  20:  344.

Dawson, G.W., et al.  1977.  The  acute  toxicity of  47 industrial  chemicals to
fresh and saltwater fishes.   Jour. Hazard. Mater.   1: 303.

U.S. EPA.  1978.   In-depth  studies on  health  and  environmental   impacts  of
selected  water  pollutants.   U.S.  Environ.  Prot.  Agency,  Contract   No.
68-01-4646.
                                     B-9

-------
Mammalian Toxicology and Human Health Effects



                           INTRODUCTION



     The  halomethanes  are  a subclass of halogenated aliphatic hy-



drocarbon compounds, some of whose members constitute important or



potentially hazardous environmental contaminants.  The seven halo-



methane  compounds  selected  for  discussion  in  this  document  are



listed in Table 1.   Many other  halogenated methane derivative chem-



icals exist,  including  various combinations of  halogen (bromine,



chlorine, fluorine,  iodine)  substitutions at  one,  two,  three, or



all four of  the hydrogen positions  of methane.  Of these, two other



particularly important halomethanes, trichloromethane (chloroform)



and tetrachloromethane (carbon  tetrachloride) are subjects of sepa-



rate  criteria  documents.   Several  recent  reviews  are  available



which present  extensive  discussions of health effects  related to



halomethane   exposure  (National  Academy of  Science  (NAS),  1978;



Davis, et al. 1977; Howard, et al.   1974).



     Humans   are  exposed  to halomethanes  by  any of  three  primary



routes:  (a)  intake  in  water  or  other fluids, (b)  ingestion in food;



and (c)  inhalation.  In certain circumstances,  e.g., occupational,



exposure by  skin absorption may be  significant.  Halomethanes have



been identified in air (Grimsrud and Rasmussen, 1975; Lovelock, et



al. 1973; Lovelock, 1975;  Singh, et al.  1977; Lillian  and  Singh,



1974), water (Shackelford and Keith, 1976;  Lovelock, 1975;  Symons,



et  al.  1975;  Morris  and McKay,  1975;  Kleopfer,  1976) and  food



(McConnell,  et al.  1975;  Monro, et  al.  1955),  but information con-



cerning  relative exposure for specific compounds  via the different
                               C-l

-------
                             TABLE 1

                                     i
                         Halomethanes
       ,a
      Names and CAS Registry Number
                      Formula
Bromome thane, methyl bromide, monobromo-

  methane, Embafume ,  Iscobrome ,  Rotox®; 74-83-9

Chloromethane, methyl chloride,
  monochloromethane; 74-87-3

Dichloromethane ,  methylene chlor ide ,
  methane dichloride,  methylene dichloride,
  methylene bichloride; 75-09-2

Tribromome thane,  bromoform, methyl
  tribromide; 75-25-2

Bromod ichloromethane ,  dichloromethyl
  bromide; 75-25-4

Dichlorodifluoromethane ,  fluorocarbon 12,

  F-12®,  Arcton 6®, Freon 12®, Frigen 12®,

  Genetron 12R, HalonR, Isotron 12R,

  dif luorodichloromethane; 75-71-8
Tr ichlorofluoromethane, fluorocarbon 11,
                            ®
Frigen 11®,
  F-ll®, Arcton 9®, Freon 11

  Algofrene type 1, tr ichloromonofluoro-

  methane, fluorotr ichloromethane; 75-69-4
                      CH3Br
                      CH3C1
                      CHBr.
                      BrCHCl.
                      CC12F2
                                                     CC13F
*Source:   International Agency  Research  on Cancer  (IARC),  1978;
 National Cancer Institute  (NCI), 1977; Stecher,  et  al.  1968;  Na-
 tional Library of Medicine, 1978.

aChemical names, common names (underlined), some trade names (cap-
 italized) and synonyms are provided.
                               C-2

-------
media  is  incomplete.  Inhalation and/or  ingestion of  fluids  are



probably the most important routes of human exposure  (NAS, 1978).



     Presence of  the  halomethanes in the environment is generally



the  result  of  natural,  anthropogenic, or  secondary  sources.    The



monohalomethanes  (bromo-, chloro-, iodomethane) are believed  natu-



ral in origin with the oceans  as  a primary  source  (Lovelock, 1975);



natural sources have  also  been proposed for dichloromethane,  tri-



bromomethane, and certain other halomethanes (NAS, 1978).



     Anthropogenic sources of environmental contamination, such as



manufacturing and  use emissions  are  important for  several   halo-



methanes.    These  include:  chloromethane (chemical intermediate in



production  of  silicone, gasoline antiknock,  rubber,  herbicides,



plastics,  and other materials);  bromomethane (soil,  seed, feed,  and



space  fumigant  agents);  dichloromethane  (paint  remover,  solvent,



aerosol  sprays,   plastics  processing);   tribromomethane  (chemical



intermediate);  bromodichloromethane   (used  as  a   reagent  in  re-



search)? dichlorodifluoromethane  and  trichlorofluoromethane   (re-



frigerant and aerosol  propellant  uses)   (NAS,  1978;  Davis,  et  al.



1977; Stecher, et al.  1968).



     Secondary sources  of  halomethanes  include such  processes as



the use of chlorine to treat municipal drinking water, some indus-



trial wastes, and  the  combustion  and  thermal degradation o£   prod-



ucts or waste materials (NAS,  1978).



                            EXPOSURE



Ingestion  from Water



     The U.S.  Environmental   Protection  Agency has  identified at



least ten halogenated methanes in finished  drinking  waters  in  the
                               C-3

-------
U.S. as of 1975:  chloromethane,  bromomethane,  dichloromethane, di-



bromomethane,   trichloromethane,  tribroraomethane,  bromodichloro-



methane,  dibromochloromethane,  dichloroiodomethane,  and   tetra-



chloromethane  (U.S.  EPA,  1975).   In  the  National Organics  Recon-



naissance Survey  in  80 cities, halogenated hydrocarbons were  found



in  finished  waters  at greater concentrations  than  in raw  waters



(Symons, et  al.  1975).   It  was concluded by Symons, et al.  (1975)



that trihalomethanes  (THM)  result  from chlorination and  are  wide-



spread  in chlorinated  drinking waters; concentrations are related



to  organic  content of raw  water.   Incidence  and  levels  of  halo-



methanes found  in  the survey are summarized in  Table 2.



     In its Region V Organics  Survey at 83 sites U.S. EPA reported



concentrations  of several  halomethanes  in a  large  percentage of



finished municipal waters,  as  summarized  in Table  3.  Of the  halo-



methanes  detected  in drinking  waters,  dichloromethane,   tetra-



chloromethane,  and  fully  chlorinated  higher hydrocarbons probably



are not products  of water chlorination (U.S. EPA,  1975; Morris and



McKay, 1975).  Because  of  its solubility,  dichloromethane may  exist



in water effluents at concentrations of up to  1,500 mg/1, depending



on process and  terminal treatment factors (NAS, 1978).



     U.S. EPA1s National  Organic  Monitoring  Survey  (NOMS), conduct-



ed  in  1976  and  1977 (Phases  L-III),  sampled  113  water  supplies



representing  various  sources  and treatments (U.S.   EPA,  1978a,b).



Incidence and concentration data for  six  halomethanes are summar-



ized in Table  4.   Some 63 additional organic compounds or classes



were detected, including these halomethanes:  bromomethane, dibromo-



methane,  bromochloromethane,   iodomethane,   dichloroiodomethane,
                               C-4

-------
                                         TABLE 2
                          Halomethanes in the National Organics
                            Reconnaissance  Survey (80  Cities)*
Compound
Tr ichloromethane
Bromod ichloromethane
Dibromochlorome thane
Tr ibromomethane
Tetr ach lor ome thane
Number of
Cities with
Positive Results
80
78
72
26
10
Minimum

0.0001
0.0003
0.0004
0.0008
0.002
Concentration,
Median

0.021
0.006
0.0012
(a)
--
mg/1
Maximum

0. 311
0.116
0.110
0.092
0.003
*Source: NAS,  1978; Symons, et al. 1975
(a)98.3 percent of 60 cities had 
-------
                                    TABLE 3

                     Halomethanes in the U.S. EPA Region V

                          Organics Survey (83 Sites)*
Compound
Dromodichlorome thane
Dibromochlorome thane
Tr ichlorome thane
Tr ibromome thane
Tetrach lor orae thane
D ichlorome thane
Percent of
Locations with
Positive Results
78
60
95
14
34**
8
Concentrations (rag/1)
Median
0.006
0.001
0.020
0.001
0.001**
0.001
Max imum
0.031
0.015
0.366
0.007
0.026**
0.007
* Source: U.S. EPA, 1975
**A total of 11  samples may have been contaminated by  exposure  to laboratory air
  containing tetrachloromethane.
                                    C-6

-------
Compound
                                                           TABLE  4

                              Partial Summary of National Organics Monitoring Survey, 1976-1977*
Number of Positive Analyses
   per  Number  of  Analyses
Mean Concentration,
   mg/1  (Positive
   Results only)
Median Concentration,
 mg/1  (All  Results)

Tr ichloro-
me tliane
Tt ibcomo-
me tliane
Ilromocl i-
chloro-
me thane
Dibronio-
chloro-
melhane
Te l r a -
chloro-
IIIU tlldllC
Dichloro-
ine thane
Phase
Q*
T
Q
T
0
T
Q
T
Q
T

I
102/111**
3/111**
88/lli**
47/111**
3/lH**
15/109
II
18/18
112/113
6/116
38/113
18/18
109/113
15/18
97/113
10/110

III
98/106
101/105
19/106
30/105
100/106
103/105
83/106
97/105
8/106
U/105

I
0.047**
0.021**
0.022**
0.017**
0.0029**
0.0061
II
0.068
0.084
0.026
0.012
0.016
0.018
0.013
0.014
0.0024

III
0.038
0.073
0.013
0.013
0.0092
0.017
0.0075
0.011
0.0064
0.0043

I
0.027
0. 003-0. OOSa
0.0096
0. 0006-0. 0033
0. 001-0. 002a
0. 001-0. 002a

0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.

II
068
059
0003a
0003a
018
014
0019
0035
0002a

III
0.022
0.045
0.0002-0
0.0003-0
0.0059
0.011
0.0021
0.0031
0.0002-0
0.0002-0



.0006a
.0006a


.0004a
.0004a

*lioucce: U.S EPA, I978b
**Sdinples shipped Iced, stored  1-2 weeks  refrigerated before  analyses.
 ^Quenched  (Q) samples preserved with  sodium  '' losulfate  at sampling,  shipped  at  ambient  temp.,  stored  20-25°C   3-6
  weeks before analyses.  Terminal(T)  sampU   treated similarly  to  Q except  no Na thiosulfate.

 ^Minimum quantifiable limits.
  1'hases (I, II, III)  refer  to  sampling projects  and corresponding  sample  treatment  and storage  conditions.
    I: Collected and analyzed as in National  Organics Reconnaissance Survey  (earlier)  (Symons, et  al.  1975).  Shipped
       and  stored refrigerated  (1-8°C) 1-2  weeks  before analyses.
   II: Samples stood at 20-25 C 3-6 weeks before  analyses.  Trihalomethanes  (TIIM)  formation  proceeded  to  reaction
       endpoints (terminal values).
  Ill: Sampled with arid without chlorine-reducing  agent (quenched,  terminal  values)  to  assess  effect of  residual chlo-
       rine and  reaction  time.
                                                               C-7

-------
and  trichlorofluoromethane.   Mean and median  total  trihalomethane



(TTHM) values in 105 to 111 cities over the  three  phases  and  sample



modes  ranged  from  0.052  to 0.120  mg/1  and 0.038  to 0,087 rag/1,



respectively.



     Data  from  a  Canadian  national  survey   for  halomethanes  in



drinking water are  in general agreement with those from  the  United



States {Health and Welfare Can. 1977).  Samples taken  from 70  fin-



ished water distribution  systems  showed  the following halomethane



concentrations:



                                   Range          Median



     Chloroform                    0 - 121        13    jug/1



     Bromod ichloromethane          0-33         1.4  ,ug/l



     Chlorodibromomethane          0 -   6.2       0.1  pg/l



     Tribromomethane               0 -   0.2       0.01  ug/1



As would be expected,  based upon previous observations,  (Symons,  et



al. 1975), chlorination as part of the water treatment process led



to considerable enhancement of halomethane concentrations, and well



sources were associated with much lower halomethane concentrations



than river or  lake  sources.   In addition,  an  unexplained increase



in the concentration of halomethanes  occurred  in  the distribution



system as  compared  to halomethane levels in water  sampled  at the



treatment plant.



     Evidence  of  the  presence  of  trichlorofluoromethane in ocean



surface waters has  been reported (Howard, et al. 1974;  Lovelock,  et



al. 1973; Wilkness, et  al.  1975).   None  was detectable below sur-



face waters,  indicating that the oceans are net a significant sink



(long-term pool or repository)  for this compound.   As  noted  above,
                               C-8

-------
 trichlorofluoromethane  has been  detected,  but not quantified,  in



 finished  drinking  water in the NOMS.   Environmental data  suggest



 that  human exposure  to  the  refrigerant-propellant  chlorofluoro-



 methanes  in water is much less significant than to  these compounds'



 presence  in air.



 Ingestion  from Food



     Bromomethane   residues  from   fumigation  decrease   rapidly



 through  loss  to  the atmosphere and  reaction  with  protein  to  form



 inorganic  bromide  residues.  With proper  aeration  and product  pro-



 cessing  most  residual bromomethane  will  rapidly  disappear due  to



 methylation reactions and  volatilization.  The more persistent in-



 organic  bromide  residues  are  products of bromomethane  degradation



 (NAS,  1978; Davis,  et  al.  1977).   Scudamore and Heuser  (1970)  re-



 ported that residues in  fumigated  wheat/  flour,  raisins,  corn,  sor-



 ghum,  cottonseed  meal,  rice,  and  peanut meal were reduced  to  less



 than 1 mg/kg  within  a  few days.   Initial levels of inorganic  bro-



 mide were  positively related to concentration  used, and  disappear-



 ance rate  was lower at  low  temperatures.  No residual bromomethane



 was  found  in  asparagus, avocados, peppers,  or tomatoes  after  two-



 hour fumigation  at  320  mg CH.,Br/m   air  (Seo,  et  al.  1970).   Only



 trace amounts were present  in wheat  flour and other products fumi-



 gated at 370  CH.,Br mg/m  after  nine days of aeration (Dennis, et al.



 1972).



     Table 5  summarizes data on organic  and  inorganic  bromide resi-



 dues in cheese with time after  fumigation, as  reported by Roehm, et



 al.  (1943).  Table 6 summarizes specific  inorganic bromide  residue



maxima   analyzed   in   several  food  commodities,   according  to
                               C-9

-------
                             TABLE 5

     Bromomethane Residues in Cheese pouter % inch) (mg/kg)*
Hours of         Longhorn Cheese A         Longhorn Cheese B
Ventilation  Inorganic  Organic Total  Inorganic  Organic Total
0.5
4
24
48
96
168
15
21
22
25
24
25
62
40
20
0
0
1
77
61
42
25
24
26
23
30
38
39
38
36
78
54
9
4
1
2
101
84
47
43
39
38
*Source: NAS, 1978; Roehm, et al. 1943
                                C-10

-------
                             TABLE 6

            Specific Residue  Maxima:  Inorganic Bromide
                        in Food  Materials*
   Max. SRa                              Materials
    0-5                  Baking powder, butter, chewing gum, dry
                         yeast, macaroni, marshmallows, oleomar-
                         garine, shortening, tapioca, flour, tea,
                         whole roasted coffee
    5-10                 Cake mix, candy, cheese, dried milk,
                         ground ginger, ground red pepper, pan-
                         cake mix, precooked breakfast cereals,
                         veal loaf
    10-15                Cocoa, ground roasted coffee, powdered
                         cinnamon
    15-20                Allspice, beef cuts, gelatin, noodles,
                         peanuts, pie crust mix
    20-30                Cornmeal, cream of wheat, frankfurters,
                         pork cuts, rice flour.
    30-40                Bacon, dry dog food, mixed cattle feed,
                         white and whole wheat flour
    40-50                Soy flour
    75-100               Grated Parmesan cheese
    100-125              Powdered eggs


*Source: NAS, 1978; Getzendaner, et al. 1968

a
 Specific Residue  (SR) _ increase in bromide from fumigation(mg/kg)
                                  rate of fumigation(Ib/min)
                              C-ll

-------
Getzendaner,  et  al.   (1968).   Lynn,  et al.   (1963)  reported  that



cows  fed  grain fumigated  with  bromomethane  gave  milk containing



bromide levels proportional to those in feed  intake.  Milk bromide



levels of up  to 20 mg/1  were  noted  at  exposure levels up to 43 mg



inorganic bromide/kg  diet,  at which level milk production was not



affected.  Blood total bromides correlated with milk bromides.



     A bioconcentration factor (BCF) relates the  concentration  of a



chemical  in  aquatic  animals to the concentration  in  the  water in



which  they  live.   The steady-state BCFs  for  a lipid-soluble  com-



pound  in  the  tissues of various aquatic animals seem to be propor-



tional  to the percent lipid  in  the  tissue.   Thus the per capita



ingestion of a lipid-soluble chemical can  be estimated  from the per



capita  consumption of fish and shellfish,  and a  steady-state BCF



for the chemical.



     Data from a recent survey on  fish  and shellfish consumption in



the United States were analyzed by the Stanford Research Institute



International  (U.S.  EPA,  1980).   These data were  used to estimate



that  the  per  capita  consumption of freshwater  and estuarine  fish



and shellfish in  the United  States is 6.5 g/day  (Stephan, 1980).



In addition,  these data  were  used with data on the fat content of



the edible portion of the same species  to  estimate  that the weight-



ed average  percent lipids  for  consumed  freshwater  and  estuarine



fish and  shellfish is 3.0 percent.



     No  measured   steady-state  bioconcentration  factor   (BCF)  is



available  for any of  the  following compounds,  but  the  equation



"Log BCF  = (0.85 Log P) - 0.70" can be  used (Veith  et  al.,  1979) to



estimate  the  steady-state BCF  for  aquatic organism  that  contain
                               C-12

-------
about 7.6 percent lipids  (Veith,  1980)  from  the  octanol/water  par-

tition coefficient (P).  The measured log P value was  obtained  from

Hansch and  Leo  (1979).  When  no  measured  value  could be  found,  a

calculated  log  P  value was  obtained using the method described  in

Hansch and  Leo  (1979).  The  adjustment  factor  of 3.0/7.6  = 0.39  is

used  to  adjust  the estimated  BCF from the  7.6  percent  lipids  on

which the equation  is  based  to the 3.0 percent  lipids that  is  the

weighted average for consumed fish and shellfish  in  order  to  obtain

the weighted average bioconcentration factor for  the edible portion

of all aquatic  organisms consumed  by  Americans.
                       Log P        Estimated  steady  Weighted
     Chemical     Meas.     Calc.      state BCF     Average BCF

     Bromoform              2.38          21              8.3

     Methylene
      chloride    1.25                     2.3            0.91
     Chloromethane  and  bromomethane are  considered  to have  rela-

tively  low  potentials  for  bioconcentration,  judging  from  their

relatively  high  vapor  pressure and  water  solubility.   Estimating

from solubility and use  of the  Metcalf  and  Lu  (1973) equation, bio-

magnification  factors for these  compounds are relatively low (two

and  six,  respectively).   No directly  determined bioaccumulation

factors are available.

Inhalation

     Reported  concentrations of  several  halomethanes  in  general

air  masses  are  summarized  in Table  7.    For   comparison,  some
                               C-13

-------
                                                    TABLE 7

                                    Ranges of Mean Concentrations (mg/m )  of
                                  llalomethanes Measured  in General Air Masses
Compound
Chlororoethane
Dichlorome thane
ruomome thane
Continental
Background
0. 0011-0. 0021ac
0.00042d
lodomethane
Tr ichloromethane
Te t r achlo r ome t ha ne
(0.000002-0.000004)

      0.000052d


 0. 000044-0.000122a'C'd
       0.000041       .
« 0.000006-0.000064)1

   0.000132,  0.000234C
 0.000126-0.000838
                                          a.c.d,j
                                   0.000699-0.000806b
-------
halomethanes other than  those addressed by  this document  (Table  1)
are included.
     Saltwater  atmospheric  background  concentrations  of  chloro-
methane averaging about  0.0025  mg/m  have been reported  (Grimsrud
and Rasmussen,  1975;  Singh,  et  al.  1977;  Lovelock, et al.  1973).
These are higher  than  reported  average  continental background and
urban levels  {ranging  from 0.001 to 0.002 mg/m )  and suggest  that
the oceans are a major source of global chloromethane (NAS, 1978).
Localized sources, such  as burning of tobacco or other combustion
processes, may  produce high indoor-air concentrations  of  chloro-
methane  (up  to  0.04 mg/m  )  (NAS,   1978,  citing  Palmer,  1976, and
Harsch, 1977).   Chloromethane is the predominant halomethane in in-
door air, and is  generally in  concentrations two  to ten  times am-
bient background levels (NAS, 1978).  Although direct anthropogenic
sources of chloromethane greatly influence indoor atmosphere con-
centrations,  they  are not  significant  contributors to  urban and
background tropospheric  levels  (NAS, 1978).
     Data on atmospheric bromomethane are few (Singh, et  al. 1977;
Grimsrud and Rasmussen,  1975).   Its  continental background  concen-
trations of 7.8  x 10   mg/m  or less are much lower than  saltwater
background and  urban  air concentrations  (NAS,  1978).   Relatively
high concentrations of bromomethane reported  in  surface  seawater
suggest that oceans are  a  major source  of the compound (Lovelock,
et al.  1973;  Lovelock,  1975), and  this is  supported by high  concen-
trations in  saltwater  atmosphere (Singh,  et  al.  1977).   There  is
evidence that combustion of gasoline containing ethylene  dibromide
(EDB,  an additive)  is also  a  significant source  of environmental
                              C-15

-------
bromomethane, and this is corroborated by urban air concentrations



at least as  high as those in saltwater air masses  (NAS, 1978, cit-



ing Harsch and Rasmussen, 1977; Singh, et al. 1977).  Table 7 sum-



marizes reported levels of bromomethane  in tropospheric air masses.


                                                      -4     3
Outdoor bromomethane  concentrations  of  up  to 8.5  x 10   mg/m  may



occur locally near  light  traffic as a result of use  of  EDB  in leaded



gasoline.   Similarly,  indoor air contaminated by exhaust  from cars



burning EDB-containing leaded gasoline can have elevated concentra-



tions  of  bromomethane  (NAS,  1978,  citing  Harsch  and  Rasmussen,



L977).



     Data on concentrations of dichloromethane in  tropospheric air



masses are scarce.  As shown  in  Table  7,  reported  background con-



centrations  in  both  continental  and  saltwater  atmospheres  were



about 1.2 x  10~   mg/m ,  and urban air  concentrations ranged from



below 7 x  10~5  to  5 x 10"4 mg/m3  (NAS,  1978, citing Pierotti and



Rasmussen, 1976,  and  Cox, et al.   1976).    Concentrations  of di-



chloromethane  in  indoor   air  typically  exceed  tropospheric back-



ground levels because  of  local  sources of contamination such as the



use of  aerosol  hair spray or  solvents  (NAS,  1978, citing Harsch,



1977).  Air  sampled  from various  indoor locations  contained di-


                                                                - 4
chloromethane at  concentrations ranging  from a low  of  2  x  10



mg/m  (in a  laundromat)  to  higher  values of  2.5  mg/m  (automobile



dealer display floor), 4.9 mg/m  (records and automotive section of



discount store), and  even 8.1 mg/m  (beauty  parlor  waiting area)



(NAS, 1978,  citing Harsch, 1977).   Indoor air  has 10 to 1,000 tiwes



more  dichloromethane  than  is  present  in unpolluted  tropospheric
                               C-16

-------
air,  and  sometimes dichloromethane is  the  predominant  halomethane



contaminant  (NAS,  1978).



      Data  through  1974  indicate  that  dichlorodifluoromethane  is



produced and used considerably more than trichlorofluoromethane and



the  other  major fluorocarbon  refrigerants  (Howard,  et al.  1974).



This  production and  use  appears  to  be  reflected  in  atmospheric



analyses showing higher concentrations  for  dichlorodifluoromethane



than  for trichlorofluoromethane.   Concentrations over  urban  areas



are several times  those over rural areas and oceans.   This  probably



reflects that the primary modes of entry to  the  environment,the use



of  refrigerants and  aerosols,  are greater  in  industrialized  and



populated  areas  (Howard, et al. 1974).   Atmospheric concentrations



of trichlorofluoromethane are higher during stagnant air conditions



and decrease upon displacement or  dilution by clean air.  Converse-



ly, concentrations in offshore air masses  increase when displaced



by polluted air masses from industrialized  urban areas  (Howard, et



al.  1974;  U.S.  EPA,  1976; Wilkness,  et al. 1975;  Lovelock,  1971,



1972).  Average  concentrations of  trichlorofluoromethane (F-ll)  re-


                                                    -4          - 3
ported for urban atmospheres  have  ranged  from 9 x 10    to  3 x  10



mg/m  , and  for ocean sites, from 2.2 x 10~  to 5  x 10~  mg/m .   Mean



urban  concentrations  for  dichlorodifluoromethane   (F-12) ranged


             - 3            -2     3
from 3.5 x  10    to  2.9 x 10   mg/m , and  an ocean atmosphere mean of


        — 4     3
5.7 x 10   mg/m  was  reported  (Howard, et al. 1974; Hester, et  al.



1974; Simmonds,  et al.  1974;  Su and  Goldberg,  1976;  Wilkness, et



al. 1973, 1975;  Lovelock,  et  al.  1973; Lovelock,  1974).  Concentra-



tions in air near  fluorocarbon release sites may be many times  the



average city levels.  F-ll concentrations of 1.3  x 10   to 2.4 x  10



mg/m  ,  about  100  times  the  city average,  were  measured  near  a




                               C-17

-------
polyurethane  plant  using the material  as  a blowing agent; near  a



cosmetics plant where aerosol cans are filled,  levels were  three  to



four times typical city  readings  (Howard, et al.  1974; Hester,  et



al. 1974).



     The  F-ll  and  F-12  fluorocarbons  are  regarded  as very stable



and persistent  in the  environment and are  without tropospheric  or



oceanic sinks.  Tropospheric lifetimes of ten to more  than  40 years



have been asserted,  and  an atmospheric  half-life of 15 to  30 years



for F-ll  has been calculated  (Howard, et al. 1974; U.S. EPA, 1976;



Howard and Hanchett, 1975; Lovelock,  et  al.  1973? Wilkness, et al.



1973;  Krey, et al.  1976).  Concern has developed that fluorocarbons



in  the  troposphere  will diffuse  into  the  stratosphere  and cata-



lytically destroy stratospheric ozone,  with  possible global health



and meteorologic effects.



     Trichlorofluoromethane  and  dichlorodifluoromethane  have been



measured  at highly varying  levels indoors  in homes.   F-ll concen-



trations  of 1.7 x 10   to 2.9 mg/m  have been  reported (Hester,  et



al. 1974).  Similar levels have been measured  in public buildings.



Indoor concentrations  were  generally higher  than  in  outside air.



In a beauty shop, where fluorocarbon-pressured  cosmetic sprays were



apt to be used, concentrations of 0.28  and  1.8  mg/m  were  reported



for F-ll  and F-12,  respectively.  Evidence of  quite high levels  of



propellants F-ll and F-12 after spray-product  releases indoors was



presented  by  Bridbord,  et  al.  (1974  cited  in U.S.  EPA, 1976).



These data are summarized in Table 8.



     Data on environmental concentrations of halomethanes  indicate



that human uptake of the trihalomethanes, bromodichloromethane and
                               C-18

-------
                           TABLE 8

    Dichlorodifluoromethane Concentrations in Room Air as
         a Result  of Release of  Aerosol Can Products*
Level at Periods after 60-      Level at Periods after 30-
second Release of Hair Spray    second Release,of Insect  ..
in 29.3m  Room (mg/m )          Spray in 21.4m  Room (mg/m }
During:
30 min:
60 min:
306.8
12.4
0.5
1 min:
60 min:
150 min:
2,304.0
130.4
56.8
*Source: U.S.  EPA, 1976;  Bridbord, et al.  1974
                             C-19

-------
tribromomethane from fluids is less than that of trichloromethane.



Uptake  of  chloromethane,  dichloromethane,  bromomethane,  and the



chlorofluoromethanes  from  fluids  is  apparently  minor;  for these,



uptake from sources other than fluid consumption is more  important



(MAS, 1978).



     Human uptake of chloromethane from fluids should be  consider-



ably less than  that  for  bromodichloromethane and tribromomethane.



However, human exposure  to chloromethane from cigarette smoke, lo-



cal  in  nature and affecting  discrete target populations,  can be



quite  significant  (NAS,  1978,  citing  Philippe  and  Hobbs,   1956,



Owens and Rossano,  1969,  and Chopra and  Sherman,  1972).  Reports or



estimates of air concentrations in rooms with people smoking  range



roughly from 0.03  to  0.12 mg/m .   The  smoker's exposure from direct



inhalation could be considerably greater still,  since the range of



reported chloromethane is 0.5 to 2 mg per cigarette.



Dermal



     Uptake of  halomethanes  from dermal exposure  can occur  under



certain  circumstances.   Occupational  exposure  standards  warn of



possible significant skin absorption for bromomethane  and  tribromo-



methane  under  industrial exposure conditions (Occupational Safety



and Health Administration (OSHA), 1976; NAS, 1978).  But  there was



no evidence in  the available  literature  that dermal exposure con-



tributes significantly  to  total  dose  of halomethanes for the gen-



eral public.
                               C-20

-------
                         PHARMACOKINETICS
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism,  and Excretion
     Most  of  the literature  regarding biological  aspects of  the
halomethanes  has focused on  the  usual case with respect  to  expo-
sure, absorption, and  intoxication.  Absorption  via  the  lungs upon
inhalation is of primary importance and is fairly efficient for the
halomethanes; absorption can  also occur  via  the skin and  gastro-
intestinal (GI)  tract, although this is generally more significant
for  the nonfluorinated  halomethanes  than  for  the  fluorocarbons
(NAS,  1978;  Davis,  et al.  1977;  U.S. EPA,  1976;  Howard, et  al.
1974).
     Bromomethane:    The usual  route   for  systemic  poisoning  by
bromomethane  is  by  inhalation,  and absorption commonly occurs  via
the  lungs;  some  absorption can also occur  through the skin,  par-
ticularly  in  skin exposures to the compound in liquid form (Davis,
et al.  1977; von Oettingen, 1964).  Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (1976) exposure standards warn of possible  signifi-
cant dermal absorption.  Significant absorption  can also occur  via
the gastrointestinal tract when bromomethane is ingested.   Upon  ab-
sorption,  blood  levels of  residual  nonvolatile  bromide increase,
indicating rapid uptake of bromomethane or  its metabolites  (Miller
and Haggard,  1943).   Bromomethane  is  rapidly distributed  to various
tissues and is broken down to  inorganic bromide.   Storage,  only  as
bromides, occurs mainly  in lipid-rich  tissues.
     Blood bromide  levels  of  24 to 250 mg/1  were  reported in  se-
vere, and 83 to 2,116 mg/1 in  fatal, bromomethane poisonings; nor-
mal  background  blood bromide  levels   ranged  up  to 15  mg/1  (NAS,
                               C-21

-------
1978, citing: Clarke, et al.  1945, Benatt and Courtney,  1948).   In



rats fed bromomethane-fumigated diets with residual bromide  levels,



higher  tissue bromide  levels were  in their  eyes,  lungs,  blood,



spleen, and  testes, while lowest  tissue levels were  in fat,  skele-



tal muscle,  bone,  and liver.   In similar bovine experiments,  bro-



mide was  secreted in milk  (Williford,  et al. 1974;  Lynn,  et  al.



1963).



     Evidently  the toxicity  of  bromomethane  is  mediated  by  the



bromomethane molecule itself and its reaction with  tissue  (methyla-



tion of  sulfhydryl groups  in critical cellular  proteins and  en-



zymes),  rather  than  by the  bromide  ion residue  resulting  from



breakdown  of the  parent  compound  (Davis,  et al.  1977).    Bromo-



methane  readily  penetrates cell  membranes  while  the  bromide  ion



does not.   Intracellular  bromomethane reactions and decomposition



result in  inactivation  of  intracellular metabolic processes, dis-



turbed  function,  and irritative,  irreversible,  or paralytic con-



sequences  (NAS,  1978;  Davis, et al.  1977;  Miller  and Haggard,  1943;



Lewis,   1948; Rathus  and  Landy,  1961;  Dixon  and  Needham,  1946).



Poisoning  with  bromomethane  is  generally  associated with  lower



blood bromide levels than is poisoning with  inorganic bromide  {NAS,



1978, citing Collins, 1965).



     Elimination  of  bromomethane   is  rapid  initially,  largely



through the  lungs  as  bromomethane.   The kidneys  eliminate much of



the  remainders  as bromide  in urine.   Final elimination may  take



longer, accounting in part  for prolonged  toxicity (NAS, 1978  citing



Miller and Haggard, 1943, and Clarke, et  al.  1945).
                               C-22

-------
     Chloromethane:  As with bromomethane,  chloromethane is  usually



encountered as a  gas  and  is absorbed readily via the lungs.   Skin



absorption is less significant (NAS, 1978;  Davis,  et al. 1977).   No



poisonings involving gastrointestinal absorption  have been  report-



ed.  Uptake of chloromethane  by  the blood  is rapid but  results  in



only moderate  blood  levels with continued  exposure.    Signs and



pathology of intoxication suggest wide  tissue  (blood, nervous  tis-



sue, liver,  and  kidney)  distribution  of  absorbed  chloromethane.



Initial disappearance from  the blood occurs rapidly.  Decomposition



and  sequestration result  primarily  by reaction with   sulfhydryl



groups  in  intracellular  enzymes  and proteins.   Excretion via  bile



and urine occurs  only  to  a  minor degree (NAS,  1978; Davis, et al.



1977; Lewis, 1948; Morgan,  et al. 1967;  von Oettingen,  1964).



     Dichloromethane:   Absorption occurs mainly  through the  lung



but  also  through  the  gastrointestinal  tract  and  to  some extent



through intact  skin.   Lung absorption efficiencies of 31 to  75  per-



cent have been reported,  influenced  by  length of  exposure,  concen-



tration,  and  activity  level  (NAS,  1978;  National  Institute for



Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),  1976a,  citing:   Lehmann and



Schmidt-Kehl,  1936, Riley,  et al. 1966, DiVincenzo, et al. 1972,



and Astrand, et  al.   1975).   Upon  inhalation  and absorption, di-



chloromethane levels increase rapidly  in the  blood  to   equilibrium



levels that depend primarily upon atmospheric concentrations; fair-



ly  uniform  distribution  to heart,   liver,   and  brain  is reported



(NAS, 1978,  citing von Oettingen, et al.  1949,  1950).  Carlsson and



Hultengren (1975)  reported that dichloromethane and  its metabolites



were in highest concentrations in white  adipose  tissue,  followed  in
                               C-23

-------
descending order  by level's  in  brain  and  liver tissue,  Dichloro-



methane  is excreted intact primarily via the  lungs,  with  some  in



the urine.  DiVincenzo, et al.   (1972) have  reported  that about  40



percent  of  absorbed dichloromethane  undergoes some  reaction and



decomposition process  in the body  (NAS, 1978).



     Some of the retained dichloromethane is metabolized to carbon



monoxide  (CO).    Some  of  this  CO  is  exhaled, but  a significant



amount  is  involved  in the formation  of  carboxyhemoglobin  (COHb).



The  formation  of  COHb leads  to  interference  with  normal oxygen



transport capabilities of blood, so  relative  oxygen deprivation and



secondary  effects  ensue   (NIOSH,  1976a,  citing  Stewart,   et al.



1972ar Fassett,  1972;  and  DiVincenzo and Hamilton, 1975; NAS,  1978,



citing Stewart,  et al.  1972a,b).  Bioconversion of CO  and formation



of  COHb continues  after  exposure.    Therefore, cardiorespiratory



stress  from elevated COHb  may  be greater  as a  result of dichloro-



methane exposure than  from exposure to CO alone (Stewart and  Hake,



1976).   Other  metabolites  of  dichloromethane  include  carbon di-



oxide, formaldehyde, and formic acid (NAS, 1978).



     Tribromomethane:  Absorption occurs  through the lungs upon in-



halation of vapors, from  the GI tract  upon  ingestion, and  to some



extent  through  the  skin.   The  OSHA  (1976)  standard  warns  of pos-



sible significant skin absorption.   Some of  the body burden  is bio-



transformed in the liver  to inorganic bromide.   After  inhalation  or



rectal  administration  of  tribromomethane, bromides were  found  in



tissues and urine (NAS/ 1977).  Bioconversion of tribromomethane and



other trihalomethanes, apparently  by  a cytochrome  P-450 dependent



mixed function oxidase system,  to carbon monoxide has  been reported
                               C-24

-------
 (Ahmed, et al. 1977).  Excretion occurs partly through the lungs as
 tribromomethane,  and complete  excretion  requires  considerable  time
 (NAS, 1978).
     Bromodichloromethane:  Little  information  is available  on the
 pharmacokinetics  or other  biological  aspects  of  this  compound.
 This  reflects its  very limited  use, primarily  in research,  and
 limited  discharge  to  the  environment  (NAS,  1978).   Current  in-
 creased environmental  interest in bromodichloromethane  focuses  on
 its presence  in  drinking water  (Kleopfer,  1976)  along with other
 trihalomethanes,  as a  consequence  of  chlorination.    Absorption,
 distribution, metabolism, and excretion may resemble that of  bromo-
 chloromethane  (see  the  following),  dichloromethane,  or  dibromo-
 methane, in  view  of close chemical  similarities  among  these  com-
 pounds  and  bromodichloromethane.   Further  possible  evidence  for
 similarity exists  in that the mutagenic, carcinogenic,  and general
 toxic effects  of  the latter are  similar  to those of other  di-and
 trihalogenated (Cl  and Br) methanes  (NAS,  1978; Sax, 1968).
     Patty  (1963)  placed bromochloromethane "roughly  in a class
 with methylene  chloride,"  but  "somewhat more  toxic,"  among  "the
 less toxic  halomethanes."   Animal experiments have indicated  that
 inhaled bromochloromethane is  readily absorbed  intact by  the blood
 and hydrolyzed in significant amounts by the body  to yield inorgan-
 ic bromide.   Tissue concentrations of  both organic and  inorganic
 bromine increased in dogs and  rats  exposed daily  to bromochloro-
methane. After exposure, blood levels decreased to  undetectable  or
 insignificant levels in 17 to 65 hours.  Significant absorption  by
 the GI  tract  after  exposure  by ingestion was indicated by hepatic
                               C-25

-------
and renal pathology in mice dosed by stomach  tube.  Similar  injury



in  these  organs was  not observed  in  animals  exposed  to vapors.



Absorption  through  the  skin would  also seem likely in view  of  its



irritation and solubility characteristics  (Patty, 1963).



     If the pharmacokinetics of bromodichloromethane does  resemble



that of chemically  similar halomethanes, it would be expected that



bromodichloromethane would:  (1) be absorbed readily by  the inhala-



tion and ingestion routes;  (2)  be distributed  widely, preferential-



ly  to  tissues with high lipid  content;  (3)  be eliminated in part



via expired breath;  and  (4)  combine with  cellular  protein  and be



metabolized to CO and inorganic halide.



     Trichlorofluoromethane (F-ll) and dichlorodifluocome thane  (F-



12):  Inhalation and absorption through the lungs are the exposure



and uptake modes of most concern;  however, when ingested, absorp-



tion of F-12 does occur  via the GI tract.  Some absorption through



the skin  could  occur  also,  judging from tests with F-113 (CC^F-



CC1F2)  (U.S.  EPA,   1976; Howard,  et al. 1974;  Clark  and Tinston,



1972a,b;  Allen  and Hanburys,  1971;  Azar,  et  al.  1973;  Sherman,



1974;  DuPont, 1968).   Absorption  and  elimination are dynamic pro-



cesses involving equilibria among air, blood,  and various tissues.



Upon  absorption a  biphasic  blood-level  pattern occurs,  with  an



initial rapid then  slower  rise in  blood levels (arterial, venous)



during  which  the  material  is  absorbed  from  blood  into tissues.



After termination of exposure  a similar  but inverse biphasic pat-



tern  of  elimination  occurs.    The  relative   decreasing  order  of



several fluorocarbons  with respect to absorption  into  blood  has



been  reported  as  F-ll,   F-113,  F-12,  F-114  (Shargel  and  Koss,
                               C-26

-------
1972; Morgan,  et  al.  1972).  These  authors  agree in general with
partition coefficients for  the  fluorocarbons  in blood,  serum, and
lipid  (oil)   (Allen  and   Hanburys,  1971;  Chiou  and  Niazi,   1973;
Morgan, et al.  1972).  More easily absorbed compounds are  retained
longer.  Under conditions of prolonged, lower-level exposure, per-
iods of elimination  (washout) are longer.   Although varying  among
individuals,  apparently  F-ll is more  readily  absorbed  in mammals
than F-12.   To what extent  this reflects  artifacts involving the
higher volatility of F-12 is not clear (Howard, et al. 1974).
     F-ll and F-12 are distributed by blood and stored temporarily
by  various  tissues.   Allen and Hanburys  (1971)  reported maximum
concentrations in adrenals  followed  by  fat and then heart.   Chem-
ically related  fluorocarbons have  been found primarily in tissues
of high lipid  content  (fat,  brain, liver,  heart), but elimination
following pulse exposure was rapid,  and  there  was  no evidence of
accumulation  (Carter,  et al. 1970a,b;  Van Stee  and  Back, 1971).
There is evidence, however,  that tissues with higher lipid content
than blood concentrate fluorocarbons from  the blood, corresponding
to  relative  order of absorption by blood  from air (Howard, et al.
1974) .
     Elimination of fluorocarbons (intact) seems  to be almost com-
pletely through the respiratory tract,  regardless of  the  route of
entry.   In dogs administered a mixture  of F-12  and F-14 (30:70 per-
cent,  vol./vol.)  by  several  different  routes,  elimination was
through  expired  air  and   none was  detected   in  urine   or   feces
(Matsumoto, et al. 1968). Rapid initial elimination is followed by
a slower phase of  decline.
                               C-27

-------
     Biochemical effects suggesting a slowing down of  cellular oxi-
dation were reported in animals exposed to 2.8 x  10  mg/m  F-ll  in
air (but not to F-ll at 1.4  x  105 mg/m3  nor to F-12 at 2.47  x  105  to
9.88 x Id5 mg/m3) (Paulet, et al. 1975).
                                                  14
     In brief  exposure  experiments  with inhaled   C-labeled F-12,
only about 1 percent of F-12  in nonvolatile urinary or tissue com-
ponents or metabolized and eliminated in expired  air as CO-  (Blake
                                            14
and Mergner, 1974).  Experiments with oral    C-labeled F-12 indi-
cated that about two percent of the total dose was exhaled as CO.,
about 0.5 percent was excreted in urine,  and  after 30 hours no F-12
was detectable (Eddy and Griffith, 1961).
     F-ll  and  F-L2  form metabolites  which  bind  to  cell constit-
uents, particularly  in  long-term exposures  with  extended equilib-
rium (Blake and Mergner, 1974).  F-ll (or its labeled metabolites)
has been reported to bind in vitro irreversibly to proteins  and  to
endoplasmic phospholipids and proteins, but  not  to  ribosomal RNA
(Uehleke, et al.  1977;  Uehleke and Warner, 1975).  Binding to rat-
liver microsomal  cytochrome  P-450-related  phospholipids  was  re-
ported  (Cox, et  al.   1972).  More  research  on fluorocarbon xeno-
biotic metabolism  and  pharmacodynamics under  prolonged  exposure
conditions is needed (U.S. EPA, 1976).
                             EFFECTS
Acute, Subacute,  and Chronic Toxicity
     For most  of  the  halomethanes  considered here,  there  is con-
siderable  information  on  clinical  toxicity  in  the  occupational
health literature and on experimental  toxicity in  the literature on
toxicology using laboratory animals.  These data have dealt primarily
                              C-28

-------
with  inhalation exposure  to grossly poisonous or fairly substantial



concentrations  of vapors  of  various  halomethanes.    Considerably



less  information  is  available on various aspects  of  toxicity  that



might  result  from prolonged  exposure to low, environmental  levels



of  these compounds,  by  not  only  the  inhalation  route  but  also



ingestion  or  other  routes  of exposure.   This  section  summarizes



briefly  the  important clinical and  toxicologic  information  avail-



able  for these compounds.



     Chloromethane:  Is  not generally  regarded as  highly  toxic,  yet



reports of poisoning  are  numerous.   Because  of  its virtually odor-



less  and colorless properties,  low-order irritancy,and  character-



istic  latency of  effect,  victims  may receive serious or  prolonged



exposure  before   awareness  and  effects  are apparent  {NAS,  1978;



Davis, et al. 1977).  Toxic dosages  for humans  are not clearly  de-



fined.  Generally, acute inhalation intoxication in humans has  been



thought to  require exposures on the  order  of 1,032 mg/m  ,  but lower



levels have produced definite toxicity in animals (MacDonald, 1964;



Smith  and von Oettingen,  1947a,b).   Chronic inhalation and  inges-



tion toxicity levels  are  not  established, but the  occupational  ex-



posure standard  for  air in the work  environment is currently  set



for 206 mg/m   (NAS,  1978; OSHA,  1976).   The monohalomethanes  seem



to  rank  in  the   following  order  of  decreasing  toxicity:   iodo-



methane, bromomethane,  chloromethane, fluoromethane (Davis,  et  al.



1977).  The similarities  in toxicologic responses  to the  monohalo-



methanes suggest   a  similar   mode  of action.   The most probable



mechanism  is  that the  monohalomethane  participates  in   the  meth-



ylation  of  essential  enzymes,  cofactors,  and  other  cellular
                               C-29

-------
macromolecules,  thereby rendering  them  inactive  (Davis,  et al.
1977).  Sulfhydryl-containing molecules seem particularly suscept-
ible  to the action of monohalomethanes  (Lewis, 1948; Redford-Ellis
and Gowenlock,  L971a).   Various  reports  on  the  effectiveness of
cysteine  administration in the treatment  of  monohalomethane poi-
soning support the contention that binding to sulfhydryl compounds
is  involved   in  the  expression  of  toxic effects  (Mizyokova and
Bakhishev, 1971).    In  studies with laboratory  animals,  several
investigators  have  shown   that  monohalomethanes  interfere  with
glutathione  metabolism  (Redford-Ellis  and  Gowenlock,  1971a,b;
Boyland,  et al.  1961; Barnsley,  1964;  Johnson,  1966; Barnsley and
Young, 1965).
     Human experience,  largely  involving  leakage  from refrigera-
tion equipment using  chloromethane as  a coolant,  shows it to be a
central nervous system (CNS) depressant with primarily  neurological
toxic manifestations  (Hansen,  et  al.  1953).    Systemic poisoning
cases have also  involved hepatic  and renal injury (Spevac, et al.
1976).  In the  more mild intoxications there  is  a characteristic
latent period of one-half to several  hours between  exposure  and on-
set of effects (symptoms).   Recovery after brief exposures  is typ-
ically within a  few  hours,  but  repeated or prolonged exposure may
result in more severe toxicity  and delayed recovery (days-weeks).
In persons occupationally exposed at levels of 52  to more than 2 x
10  mg/m  the following toxic manifestations, particularly related
to CNS, were noted:  blurred vision, headache, nausea,  loss of co-
ordination, personality changes (depression, moroseness, anxiety),
lasting a few  hours to  several days;  some  were  more sensitive to
chloromethane upon return to work  (MacDonald, 1964; Hansen, et al.
                              C-30

-------
1953;  Browning,  1965;  Morgan,  1942).   As  mentioned  previously,



tobacco-smoking may be an additional significant  source  of  individ-



ual human exposure  to chloromethane.



     Severe poisonings are usually characterized by a latent  period



and  severe  and dominant  neurological disorder, with perhaps  ir-



reversible and/or persistent sequelae? renal and  hepatic injury  are



common.  In  fatal  cases  coma and  death commonly ensue  in  hours or



days as  a  result of  cerebral and  pulmonary edema and  circulatory'



failure, with pathologic findings of  congestion, edema, and  hemor-



rhage;  chloromethane has been detected in all organs  analyzed after



death  (NAS, 1978, citing Baird,  1954).



     There have  been  no  reports of reproductive toxicity  or  tera-



togenicity in humans  exposed  to chloromethane,  but metabolic,  en-



zymatic, and neuroendocrine disturbances following exposure  in  hu-



mans and/or  animals suggest the need for research  on  this  point



(Davis, et al.  1977).   Epidemiological studies of toxicity  in human



populations  exposed  to chloromethane  (including mutagenicity  and



carcinogenicity) have not yet appeared in the published literature.



     In animals, a variety of toxic effects have been noted  in  ex-



perimentally exposed  subjects.   Many  effects  are  similar  for  the



monohalomethanes and, consistent with human  data,  suggest  CNS  in-



volvement and altered  metabolism  involving binding  to  sulfhydryl-



containing cellular macromolecules  (Davis, et al.  1977;   Balander



and Polyak, 1962; Gorbachev, et al. 1962; Kakizaki,  1967;  Redford-



Ellis and Gowenlock,  1971a,b).  Most  toxicity information  is from



inhalation studies, with little regarding other  routes, apparently



because  of   the  volatility  of  these compounds  and  their   usual

-------
presence  in  the gas phase  (Davis,  et  al.  1977).   Some  inhalation
toxicity  data  for  chloromethane  are summarized  in  Table  9.    In
general,  chloromethane  is  less  acutely toxic  by inhalation  than
broraomethane.   In severe acute  exposure  conditions chloromethane
produces serious neurological disturbances, with functional and be-
havioral manifestations and ultimately death.  However,  these  dis-
turbances  from  chloromethane occur  at  higher concentrations  than
are  required  for bromomethane  in several  species  (Davis, et al.
1977).
     Under more prolonged exposures  to less severe levels,  chloro-
methane increased mucus  flow and  reduced mucostatic effect  of other
agents (e.g., nitrogen oxides) in cats (Weissbecker, et  al. 1971).
Permanent muscular dysfunction is described in mice surviving  sev-
eral weeks of  daily exposures at 1,032 mg/m  ,  and paralysis  fol-
lowed exposure  to 531 mg/m  for 20 hours in surviving animals  (von
Oettingen, et al. 1964).   No teratogenic effects  have been  reported
for chloromethane (Davis, et al. 1977).
     Bromomethane:  is regarded as a  highly toxic  substance  by acute
exposure and more dangerous than chloromethane.   It  has been re-
sponsible for many occupational poisoning  incidents, reflecting its
widespread use  as a fumigant.   Like chloromethane  it  has  a char-
acteristic latent period  and  its presence is difficult  to  detect,
so prolonged and more severe  exposure  may  be  incurred  (NAS, 1978;
Davis, et al. 1977).  Toxicologic and metabolic similarities among
the  monohalomethanes  (C1-,  Br-,  I-substituted)   suggest  a common
mechanism of toxic action, probably methylation and disturbance  or
                               C-32

-------
                                                      TABLE 9

                                    Chloromethane  Inhalation Toxicity in Animals
Concent rat ion,
mg/m
3.1 x 10  to 6.2 x 10
4.1 x 10  to 8.3 x ]0
4.1 x 10]j
1.4 x lo:*
6.2 x 10J to 8.3 x 10J
6.5 x
6.2 x
      10:
      10:
4.1 x 1(T
2,065
1,032
620 to 1,032

531
                         Duration
                         Dcief
                         30-60 min
2 hr.
Up to 1 hr
6 hcs/day

6 hrs
4 hrs
6 hrs/day
                                       Response
                         6 hrs/day
                         6 hrs/day
                         20 hrs
Quickly lethal to most animals
Dangerous effects.  Increased respira-
  tory and heart rates and blood pres-
  sure, followed by reversals and ECG
  changes; restlessness, salivation,
  incoordInation, narcosis.
LC  ,  guinea pig
No Serious effects
Deaths, rats, 3-5 days, spasmodic
  dyspnea
t,C,-n,  mouse
LCLO'  rflt
1 week, cats, weakness, unable  to right
  I week, cats, dyspnea, refusal to
  eat/drink.
3-4 weeks, cats, death
2-3 days, guinea pigs, deaths
4-7 days, monkeys, convulsions
1-3 days, dogs, deaths
5-6 days, rabbits and rats, death
1-6 days, dogs, deaths
1 expos., dogs and monkeys, signs o£
  poisoning; 2-4 weeks, dogs, deaths,
  permanent neuromuscular damage in survi-
  vor; 1 week, mice, convulsions, mortality;
15 weeks, mice, permanent adductor contrac-
  tion in survivors
Overt signs of toxicity detectable  in
  dogs and monkeys.
Paralysis in survivors (but  in  another ex-
  posure at 620 mg/m  , no cumulative overt
  toxicity or neurotoxic changes over
  several months  In several species).
                                                                                      Re £e re nee
                                                             Patty,  1958
                                                             von Oettingen,  1964
NIOSI1, 1976b
Patty, 1958
von Oettingen, 1964

Davis, et al. 1977
DI1EVJ, 1975
von Oettingen, 1964
                                                              von Oettingen,  1964
                                                              von Oettingen,  1964
                                                                                       Smith  & von Oettingen,  I947a

                                                                                       von  Oeltingen,  1964;
                                                                                       Smith  & von Oettingen,  1947a
                                             C-33

-------
inactivation  of  essential proteins  (rather than  presence  of the



parent compound or free halide per se) (Davis,  et al. 1977).



     Human experience  indicates  that  acute fatal intoxication can



result from  exposures to  vapor  levels as  low  as  1,164  to  1,552



mg/m , and harmful effects can occur  at 388 mg/m   or more.   System-



ic poisoning  has  been reported to occur  from  two weeks'  exposure



(eight hrs/day)  at about  136  mg/m   (WAS,  1978,  citing:    Kubota,




1955; Johnstone,  1945;  Bruhin, 1943;  Wyers, 1945;  Watrous,  1942;



Rathus and  Landy,  1961;  Miller and  Haggard,  1943;  Tourangeau and



Plamondon, 1945;  Viner, 1945; Collins, 1965; Clarke, et al. 1945).



Symptoms   generally  increase  in severity with increasing levels of



exposure  and may vary somewhat according  to exposure circumstances



and  individual  susceptibility.   In  sublethal  poisoning  cases  a



latency period of  2  to 48  hours  (usually  about  four to six hours)




between exposure and onset of symptoms is  characteristic  (Araki, et



al. 1971).



     Like the other monohalomethanes,  bromomethane is  a CNS  depres-




sant  and  may   invoke  psychic,   motor,   and   GI  disturbances.



(Mellerio, et al.  1973,  1974;  Greenberg,  1971;  Longley and Jones,



1965; Hine,  1969).   In light  poisoning cases effects may be  limited




to mild  neurological  and GI  disturbances,  with  recovery  in a few



days.  Moderate cases involve the CNS  further,  with more extensive



neurological  symptoms and visual  disturbances.    Recovery  may be



prolonged for weeks or months,  with persisting symptoms and/or dis-



turbed function.   Severe  cases  also   involve a  latent  period and



similar initial symptoms, with development of disturbed speech and




gait, incoordination, tremors that may develop to convulsions, and
                               :-34

-------
psychic disturbances.   Recovery can be quite protracted with  per-



sisting  neurological disorders  (Araki,  et  al.  1971).    In  fatal



cases  the  convulsions may become  more  intense  and frequent,  with



unconscious periods.  Death may occur in  a  few hours from pulmonary



edema or in one to  three days  from circulatory failure.  Pathology



often  includes hyperemia,  edema,  and  inflammation  in  lungs and



brain.   Degenerative changes  occur  in  the kidneys,  liver,  and/or



stomach, and perhaps  the brain; although brain changes are  usually



more  functional  in  character  (NAS,  1978;  Davis,  et  al.   1977).



Apparently blood  bromide  levels of LOO mg/1 or  less  result  in re-



covery, 135 in moderate disability, 195 in  residual  ataxia,  and 250



in convulsions  (Hine, 1969).



     Direct skin  contact  with bromomethane may produce prickling,



itching, cold sensation, erythema,  vesication, blisters (similar  to



second degree  burn),  and  damage  to peripheral nerve  tissue  or de-



layed dermatitis  (Davis, et al. 1977).  A case of brief skin expo-



sure  (spray)  to  liquid bromomethane,  quickly  decontaminated, did



not produce a burn, but resulted in severe, delayed,  neuromuscular



disturbances  (twitching,  fits, convulsions)  and  permanent brain



damage (cerebellum and pyramidal tract)  (Longley and  Jones,  1965).



The OSHA  (1976)  standard  for  bromomethane in workroom  air is  78



mg/m  (ceiling) and carries  a  warning  notation of possible signifi-



cant skin absorption  (NIOSH, 1976b; OSHA, 1976).



     In animals bromomethane is highly toxic.  It is  more toxic  by



inhalation to  several species  than  chloromethane  (Davis,  et al.



1977).    Correspondence   between   effective  doses  by  inhalation



vs.  ingestion  is   difficult  to assess until  more  is known of GI
                              C-35

-------
absorption and first-pass detoxification  (Davis, et al.  1977).   In



several  species   acute  fatal  poisoning   has  involved  marked CNS



disturbances with a variety of manifestations:  ataxia,  twitching,



convulsions, coma,  as  well  as changes in  lung,  liver,  heart, and



kidney tissues (Sayers, et al. 1930;  Irish, et al.  1940; Gorbachev,



et  al.  1962;  von Oettingen,  1964).    In  subacute  and protracted



exposure   studies   similar   neurological  disturbances  developed



(Irish, et al.  1940;  Sokolova, 1972)  in animal and  human  (Drawneek,



et  al.  1964)  as  acute  toxicoses.    Inhalation  toxicity in animal



species is briefly reviewed in Table 10.    In  general  the monohalo-



methanes  rank  in decreasing  order  of acute  toxicity as  follows:



iodomethane, bromomethane, chloromethane,  fluoromethane  (Davis,  et



al. 1977).



     Dogs  receiving  bromomethane chronically  by  ingestion (fumi-



gated  diet yielding  residual  bromide   at a  dose  level   of 150



nig/kg/day) were adversely affected,  whereas if they received sodium



bromide at  78  mg/kg/day  (residual  bromide) no  effects were  noted



(Rosenblum, et al.  1960).  In  another  experiment using fumigated



food with  residual bromide, Vitte, et  al.  (1970)  detected changes



in  blood  iodine  and  calcium  and  pathologic changes in thyroid and



parathyroid glands.   Toxic responses  in rabbits administered bromo-



methane  subcutaneously  (in   oil)  at 20-120  mg/kg  included  limb



paralysis, cessation of drinking, reduced  urine excretion.  Levels



greater than 50 mg/kg sharply  increased the blood  bromide level and



reduced platelets, serotonin,  and water content (Xakizaki, 1967).



     Groups of cattle  were  fed  oat  hay  from  a bromomethane-fumi-



gated field or pelleted  ration containing sodium  bromide added  at



various concentrations.  The  hay contained bromide  ion at  6,300  to





                               C-36

-------
                 TABLE 10



BroBOBethane  Inhalation Toxicity in AniBals
Concentrat ion
•9/«3
69,452
24.929
20.952
7,760-11.640
7,760-11,640
3.391
1,940-2,128
2,293
1,536-1,940
1,536
1,164
1,164
997
846
846
582
504

419
252

120

97

70
Duration
15 Bin
1 hr
20 Bin
30 uln
70 Bin
30-40 Bin
4.5 hcs
12 hrs
6 he/dally
Not specified
5 hrs
13.5 hrs
22 hrs
3 hr
26 hr
9 hrs
18 hra (2 exp. at
3 BO interval)
7-8 hrs daily
8 he/day, 5
da/uk.
8 hr/day, 5
da/wk.
4-5 BOS

40 Bin
Response
Lethal, cats
""Lo' rabblt
Delayed deaths (6 days), guinea pigs
Delayed deaths (9 hr), 1 of 6 guinea pigs
LClofl, guinea pigs
Lethal, dogs
Lethal within 2 days, salivation, guinea pigs
Lethal, rabbits
CuBulative overt toxicity, dogs t Bonkeys
LC5Q, Bice
Delayed death, 1 of 6 guinea pigs
Lethal, all died within 3 days, guinea pigs
100% lethal in rats
Lethal, rabbits
Lethal, rats
Lethal to Bost in 1-3 daysj guinea pigs
Altered conditioned reflexes, Bice

Height loss, prostration, convulsions} rats
At 22 days: typical poisoning, rabbits

Eventually lung irrit., paralysis, rabbits
(but not rats, guinea pigs, or Bonkeys)
Altered neuroendocr ine controlled Betabo-
llsB, rabbits
Changes in «otor responses
Reference
von Oettingen, 1964
NIOSH, 1976b
von Oettingen. 1964
von Oettingen, 1964
von Oettingen, 1964
von Oettingen, 1964
von Oettingen, 1964
Gorbachev, et al. 1962
SBith fc von Oettingen. I947a
Balander £ Polyak, 1962
von Oettingen, 1964
von Oettingett, 1964
Irish, et al. 1940
von Oettingen, 1964
Irish, et al. 1940
von Oettingen, 1964
Sokolova, 1972

Irish, et al. 1940
Irish, et al. 1941

Irish, et al. 1941

Balander t Polyak, 1962

Balander t Polyak, 1962
              C-37

-------
8,400 mg/1  concentrations.   Groups  fed  the  hay and highest dose-



rate of bromide in pelleted ration developed signs of CNS  toxicity



(motor  incoordination)  at  10  to 12 days of exposure.  Incoordina-



tion correlated with serum  bromide  concentrations  of  2,400  mg/1  (30



meq/1)  or  more.    Serum bromide levels  and  neurologic  signs were



markedly reduced  two weeks after  termination  of  exposure  (Knight



and Reina-Guerra, 1977).



     No reports on bromomethane teratogenicity  studies were  avail-



able, but high levels in testes after ingestion of fumigated food,



and enzymatic  and  neuroendocrine  disturbances, could have  terato-



genic implications.   Further studies in  this  area would  appear to



be warranted (Williford, et al. 1974).



     Dichloromethane:   As  with chloromethane,  dichloromethane  has



not generally  been  regarded  as highly toxic,  but poisonings, pri-



marily from inhalation exposures, have been reported.  Human mini-



mal  toxic  concentrations or doses  have not been  determined.   At



this time the OSHA  occupational  exposure standard (air  concentra-



tions as a TWA  for  eight hours) is 1,737 mg/m with ceiling  and peak



values of 3,474 and  6,948  mg/m ,  respectively  (OSHA, 1976).  How-



ever, NIOSH has recommended an eight-hour TWA concentration  of  260



mg/m3 with a peak limit  of 1,737 mg/m3 (NIOSH, 1976b).  A TCTn (low-
                                                           LO


est reported toxic  concentration)  over  eight  hours of 1,737 mg/m



for humans  is  reported  (NIOSH,  1976b), and  exposures  of 740  or



1,786 mg/m  for one hour were  reported as being  without adverse  ef-
fect by Stewart,  et al.  (1972a,b).  However, Winneke  (1974) report-



ed exposure  to 1,101 mg/m   or more  for  three to  four  hours de-



creased  psychomotor  performance   (NAS,   1978).    Dichloromethane
                               C-38

-------
affects central nervous system function.   It  is also  irritating  to
mucous membranes  (eyes, respiratory  tract) and skin.   In  addition,
it  results  in production  of carbon monoxide  (CO)  as  a metabolite,
which  increases  carboxyhemoglobin (COHb)  in  the  blood and  inter-
feres with oxygen transfer  and transport  (NAS, 1978).
     Mild poisonings by dichloromethane produce somnolence,  lassi-
tude,  anorexia,  and mild  lightheadedness, followed  by  rapid and
complete recovery.   Severe  cases  are characterized  by greater de-
grees of disturbed CMS function and depression.  Permanent disabil-
ity has not been reported.  In fatal poisonings cause of  death has
been  reported as  cardiac  injury and  heart  failure  (NAS,   1978,
citing:   Hughes,  1954,  Stewart  and Hake,  1976,  Collier,   1936,
Moskowitz and Shapiro, 1952).
     The formation of CO and COHb  from dichlororaethane forms  a ba-
sis  for  concern  about combined  exposures to  dichloromethane and
carbon monoxide.   Fodor and Roscovanu (1976)  and NIOSH (1976a) re-
commend re-examination of  dichloromethane exposure  standards with
intent to reducing them.   These authors  report that  exposure  at the
current  threshold  limit value  (TLV) of  dichloromethane  produces
COHb levels equivalent to those produced  by the TLV for CO.   Mixed
exposures could be a problem,  especially  in  workers,  smokers, and
cardiorespiratory patients  or other  susceptibles.   Concern  about
mixed exposure to  dichloromethane and  other  lipophilic   solvents,
with enhanced danger of marked CNS and metabolic effects  resulting
from modest  exposure  to individual  materials,  has  been  expressed
(Savolainen, et al.  1977).
                               C-39

-------
     Gynecologic  problems  in female workers exposed  for  long  per-



iods  to  gasoline  and  dichloromethane  vapors  were  reported  by



Vozovaya  (1974).   In pregnant women, chronic exposure  resulted  in



dichloromethane passing  through  the placenta into the  fetus.  Di-



chloromethane  also  was  found in  the milk of lactating  women a few



hours into a work  shift.  Functional circulatory disorders in work-



ers exposed  for more than  three  years to organochlorine  compounds



(including  dichloromethane)  at   "permissible"   levels  have   been



reported by Dunavskii (1972).  Symptoms  included  chest  pain, elec-



trocardiograph  irregularities,  bradycardia,  decreased myocardial



contractility,  and  altered   adaption  to physical  stress.    More



recently it has been reported (Stewart  and  Hake, 1976) that fatal



heart attacks  have  been caused  by  exposure to  dichloromethane  in



workers removing paint and varnish  (NAS, 1978).



     Animal  toxicology  of  dichloromethane  is  briefly  reviewed  in



Table 11,  with some human  data  included.    Both di-and  tri-halo-



genated methane derivatives  have been  found  to produce  increased



blood levels of COHb; the  greatest  increase caused  by  iodo-,  fol-



lowed by bromo- and  chloro-compounds.  CNS  functional disturbances



are reported,  including depression  of REM-sleep,  as seen  in carbon



monoxide exposures  (Fodor  and Roscovanu, 1976).   Liver  pathology



has  been   reported   in  experimental  exposure   to dichloromethane



vapors (Balmer, et al.  1976). NAS  (1978) cites  Haun,  et al.  (1972)



reporting  liver changes  in mice  continuously exposed to  dichloro-



methane at  87  and  347  mg/m   for  up to  two  weeks.  As  a  liquid  or



vapor dichloromethane was ophthalmotoxic  in  rabbit tests,  producing



persistent  (up  to  two  weeks)  conjunctivitis  and  blepharitis,
                               C-40

-------
                                              TABLE  11
                                     Toxicity of Dichloromethane
Exposure Con-
centration
or Dose
6,460 mg/kg
17,370 mg/m3

3,000 mg/kg
2,700 mg/kg
2,136 mg/kg
1,900 mg/kg
1,500 mg/kg
*j
4,342 mg/m
•3
3,425 mg/m
950 mg/kg -
1,737 mg/m
-5
1,737 mg/ni

1,737 mg/m:?
1,737 mg/m
200 mg/kg
87-347 mg/m3


Duration
Subcut.
2 hrs

Oral
Subcut.
Oral
Oral
I. P.
7 hr/day,
9 day
1 he
I. P.
6 hr/day,
few days
year, in-
termi ttent
6 hrs
3 hrs
I.V.
Contin.
up to
2 wks
Response
LD5Q, mouse
LC , guinea pig. Depressed
running activity, rats
LDLo, dog
LDT , rabbit and dog
L>O
LD 0, rat
LD^, rabbit
LD5Q, mouse
Fetotox., teratogenicity , mice,
rats
Transient lightheadedness, human
LDLo' dog
Altered brain metabolism,
behav ior , rats
TCLo, CSN, human

TC , blood, human (12% COHb)
13* COHb, rats
LD , dog
Liver changes, mice


Reference
NIOSH, 1976b
NIOSH, 1976b
Heppel & Neal,
NIOSH, 1976b
NIOSH, 1976b
NIOSH, 1976b
NIOSH, 1976b
NIOSH, 1976b
Schwetz, et al.

Stewart, et al.
NIOSH, 1976b
Savolainen, et

NIOSH, 1976b

NIOSH, 1976b



1944*





1975 +
j.
1972a,b
al. 1977




Fodor & Roscovanu, 1976
NIOSH, 1976b

Haun, et al. 1972T




*Cited by NIOSH, 1976a
+Cited by NAS,  1978
                                    C-41

-------
corneal thickening, keratitis and iritis,  and  increased  intraocular



tension (Ballantyne,  et  al.  1976).   Inhalation  exposures of  rats



and mice to vapor levels of 4,342 mg/m  for seven hours daily  ges-



tation days  from  6  to 15 produced  increased  blood  levels of  COHb



and evidence  of feto- or embryo-toxicity,  but not  teratogenicity



(Schwetz,  et al. 1975; NIOSH,  1976a, citing Heppel and Neal,  1944).



     At 1.737  mg/m   voluntary  running activity  was depressed  in



rats.   Sleep  alterations were noted  in  rats  exposed to  dichloro-



methane at 3,474 mg/m  or more (Wolburg, 1973).  Depressed CNS ex-



citability, along with increased  blood  levels and expiratory, he-



patic, and renal excretion of dichloromethane  in subacute studies,



was reported (Avilova, et al. 1973).



     Tribromomethane:  Little  information is  available concerning



the toxicology of tribromomethane.   It is  regarded as a  highly  tox-



ic material,  more  toxic  than dibromomethane  but less  than  tetra-



bromomethane and triiodomethane  (NAS,  1978,  citing Dep.  Health  Edu.



Welfare,  1975).  Minimum toxic concentrations have not  been  estab-



lished, but its general toxic potential  is  reflected  in  a  quite low



occupational  exposure standard  {OSHA,   1976):    eight-hour  time-



weighted-average air  concentration,  5.2  mg/m   (the  most  stringent



standard of the halomethanes considered  herein).   It  is  absorbed  by



all major  routes (lungs,  GI  tract,  skin) after appropriate exposure



(NAS,  1978).



     In humans, exposure to toxic levels of vapor produces  irrita-



tion of respiratory tract,  pharynx,  and  larynx,  with  lacrimation



and salivation.   Most reported  cases of  poisonings have resulted



from accidental overdoses administered in  the  treatment  of whooping
                               C-42

-------
cough.   Toxic symptoms appear  after  a  shorter latent period  than



that typical of other halomethanes.  Obvious  toxic effects  in light



cases may  be  limited to  headache,  listlessness,  and vertigo.  Un-



consciousness,  loss  of reflexes, and convulsions  occur  in severe



cases, and in fatal cases the  primary  cause of  death  is respiratory



failure.  Clinical recovery  in moderate  poisonings may be relative-



ly rapid  and  without permanent  damage or disability.  Presence of



tribromomethane in all organs is indicated by  pathologic findings,



which also  indicate  fatty degenerative  and centrilobular  necrotic



changes  in the  liver  (as  in  trichloro-  and  triiodomethane poison-



ings) (NAS, 1978,  citing von Oettingen,  1955).



     Animal data  are generally  consistent  with  those  from  human



case histories.   Impaired liver function (prolonged pentobarbital



sleeping time  and/or  BSP  retention)   in mice  resulted  from single



subcutaneous doses of tr ibromomethane  ranging between 278 and 1,112



mg/kg.  These  functional effects  correlated with pathological liver



changes  at the  higher  dose  levels  (Kutob and Plaa,  1962).   Patho-



logical  changes  in  liver  and  kidney have  been  reported  (Dykan,



1962) in  guinea pigs after systemic  administration  of  a level of



100  to  200 mg/kg  per day for ten days  (NAS,  1978).   Experimental



data for animals are  briefly summarized  in Table 12.  Reticuloendo-



thelial  system function  (liver  and  spleen  phagocytic  uptake of


125
   I-Lister ia monocytogenes) was suppressed  in mice exposed 90  days



to  tr ibromomethane  at  daily  dose  levels of  125  mg/kg  or   less



(Munson, et al.  1977, 1978).



     Bromodichloromethane:  No  information on human intoxication by



this compound was  available,  and there  have  been  no occupational
                              C-43

-------
                                            TABLE 12

                                 Bromoform Toxicity  in Animals
Concentration
or Dose
Duration
or Route
Response
Reference
1,820 mg/kg

1,400 mg/kg




581 mg/kg
410 mg/kg

250 mg/m3
100-200 mg/kg/da
0.3-125 mg/kg/da
Subcutaneous, single

Intragastric, single
Subacutaneous, oil,
 single
Subacutaneous, single

Inhalation, 4 hrs
 daily, 2 mos.
Injection, daily,
 10 days

Intragastric,
 90 days
LD,.-, mouse

LD5Q, mouse, ICR, O; fatty
liver; kidney palor; hemor-
rhage in adrenals, lungs,
brain

Median effective dose for
prolongation of phenobarb.
sleeping time.  Approx.
threshold.  278 mg/kg.
Mouse.

LD.  , rabbit
  LiO

Disorders in liver glyco-
genesis and prothrorobin
synthesis;  reduced renal
filtration capacity.

Threshold:  50 mg/m .
Rat.

Liver and kidney pathol.,
guinea pig

Suppressed liver phago-
cytosis, mice
Kutob & Plaa, 1962

Bowman, et al. 1978




Kutob & Plaa, 1962
NIOSH, 1976b

MAS, 1977, citing
Dykan, 1962
NAS, 1978, citing
Dykan, 1962

Munson, et al. 1978
                                          C-44

-------
exposures reported by Sax (1968). However, he reported the  compound



as "dangerous" and "probably narcotic  in  high concentrations."



     Bowman, et al. (1978) have recently reported on acute  toxicity



tests in mice.  Median lethal doses LD5Q  for ICR  Swiss mice  admin-



istered bromodichloromethane (solubilized  in emulphor: alcohol  and



saline mix) by gavage were 450  and 900  mg/kg  for  males and  females,



respectively.  Based  on  comparative LD,.- data among  four  trihalo-



methanes, bromodichloromethane was  the  most  acutely  toxic in both



males and females, and males were more  susceptible than females  for



all compounds.  Sedation and anesthesia occurred  within 30 minutes



at the  500  mg/kg dose level  for bromodichloromethane,  and  lasted



for about  four hours.  Animals  that  died in groups  dosed over a



range of  500  to  4,000 mg/kg showed  fatty infiltration in livers,



pale  kidneys,  and  hemorrhage   in kidneys,  adrenals, lungs,   and



brain.



     In  mice  that were  offered  bromodichloromethane in  drinking



water at  300  mg/1  (with  and without use  of  emulphor),  water con-



sumption and  body-weight  decreased  dramatically   (Campbell,  1978).



Body weight regained  parity  with  controls  in  several weeks, but  wa-



ter consumption did  not.   There  was no  obvious  effect on suscep-



tibility to pathogenic Salmonella typhimur ium  delivered  by  gavage



after several  weeks'  exposure.    However,  Schuller, et  al.  (1978)



have observed a suppression  of cellular  and humoral  immune  response



indices in female ICR mice exposed by gavage for  90 days to  bromo-



dichloromethane at 125 mg/kg daily.   Sanders,  et  al.  (1977)   ob-



served hepatomegaly and a depression in  a reticuloendothelial  system



functional index (phagocytic) in mice exposed to bromodichloromethane
                               C-45

-------
Munson,  et  al.  (1977)  reported  a dose-dependent  suppression  of
hepatic phagocytosis in mice exposed for 90 days  to daily  doses  of
bromodichloromethane by gavage ranging  up  to  L25  mg/kg.
     Teratogenic properties  of  bromodichloromethane have  not  been
clearly demonstrated, but some fetal anomalies were reported in ex-
periments in which mice  were exposed to  vapors at  8,375 mg/m seven
hrs/day during gestation days 6 to  15 {Schwetz, et  al. 1975).
     Trichlorofluoromethane   (F-ll)   and  dichlorodifluoromethane
(F-12):  These propellant fluorocarbons are discussed together be-
cause  of  their  physicochemical  and general  toxicologic  similar-
ities.  They may be regarded as  the least  toxic  of the halomethanes
considered in this document.   Standards  for maximum  average concen-
trations in air  of work  spaces  are established at 5,600 and 4,950
mg/m  for F-ll and F-12,  respectively  (OSHA, 1976).  For  reference,
these  may be  compared  to the  following standards for other halo-
methanes :

     tribromomethane                        5 mg/m
     bromomethane                          80 mg/m
     chloromethane                         206 mg/m
     dichloromethane                    1,737 mg/m

It has  been  recommended that  these standards for maximum  average
concentration be reduced to  260 mg/m .
     Because of their physical properties and  use  patterns  the  pri-
mary route of exposure  in  toxicity studies has been by  inhalation
of vapors at high  concentrations,  resulting in  rapid pulmonary ab-
sorption.  The  two toxicologic  features of the fluorocarbons  that
have  received  the  greatest  attention are  their cardiovascular and
                               C-46

-------
bronchopulmonary  actions.    The toxicities  of F-ll  and  F-12 are



thought to be mediated at least in  part  by metabolic products which



bind  to  lipid  and  protein  cell constituents and affect vital pro-



cesses (e.g., retard cellular oxidation).  There remains a  need for



more  metabolic  and  toxicologic information  on  the consequences of



prolonged exposure to environmental levels (U.S.  EPA,  1976; Howard,



et al. 1974).



      Human experience in fluorocarbon toxicity has  largely  involved



the  intentional or  unintentional misuse of  fluorocarbon products,



resulting in acute inhalation of high vapor  concentrations.  Numer-



ous severe and fatal cases  of abuse are  on record,  such as  from in-



haling deeply  from spray-filled bags  to  achieve  a  "jag."  These



probably involve cardiac arrhythmia complicated by elevated circu-



lating  catecholamines  and  CO-  (Bass,  1970;  Killen  and  Harris,



1972).  Similar toxic consequences could occur  in asthmatics using



fluorocarbon-propellant   bronchodilator  products   (Taylor   and



Harris, 1970; Archer, 1973).   Occupational-exposure  data  are lim-



ited.  Speizer, et al.  (1975) have reported  a  relationship between



cardiac palpitation  episodes and  level of   use  of F-12  and  F-22



(CHC1F2)   propellants  in  hospital  pathology   department  workers



(frozen-section preparation).



      In brief experimental  exposures of  humans  to F-12 at 198 x 10



mg/m  vapor  concentration  in air,  tingling  sensation,  humming  in



the ears,  apprehension, EEC  and  speech changes,  and deficits  in



psychological performance were reported.  In other tests exposures



to F-12 at 49 x 10   to  543  x 10"  mg/m  caused cardiac arrhythmia,



decreased consciousness, and amnesia or deficits in performance on
                              C-47

-------
psychomotor  tests  scores (Kehoe, 1943; Azar,  et  al.  1972).  How-



ever,  in  women  using  fluorocarbon-propellant  (F-ll;  F-12; F-114



(CC1F_-CC1F2))   aerosol  products  and receiving  nine  or more times



the exposure from  normal  use,  Marier,  et  al.  (1973)  found  no mea-



surable blood levels of the  fluorocarbons  or  abnormalities in over-



all health,  respiratory, or hematologic parameters.



     Good, et al. (1975) reported an excess of  atypical metaplastic



cells  in  sputum of  frequent  aerosol-product users.    The  authors



suggested  the  possibility of  some  products  altering the  resident



bacterial flora of the  respiratory  tract or containing tumorigenic



constituents (not necessarily the propellants).   Data from a survey



of aerosol product use  and respiratory symptoms by Lebowitz (1976)



led  him  to  suggest  a  "tendency  for  more symptoms  to  follow  in-



creased aerosol  usage,  most consistently among nonsmokers" (U.S.



EPA,  1976).    Human  data   on  halothane  (a   chemically  similar



CF,CHBrCl  gaseous  anesthetic)  suggest   potential   toxic  hazards



(liver, kidney, and CNS changes;  risk of abortion  and developmental



anomalies, increased susceptibiltiy  to  cancer  in females)  from pro-



longed exposure  at  relatively  low levels, with implications part-



icularly for operating  room  personnel.   Animal data on  halothane



are generally supportive  (U.S.  EPA,  1976).  The primary human haz-



ard  from  F-ll   inhalation  (by  whatever circumstance:  intentional



misuse of  aerosol  products  to achieve  intoxication  or overuse of



propellant bronchodilators)  is  the induction of  cardiac arrhythmias



(Howard, et  al. 1974).



     The inhalation  toxicology of F-ll and  F-12 in animals is  se-



lectively summarized in Tables 13,  14, and 15.  Several propellant
                               C-48

-------
                                                         TABLE  13

                                               Inhalation Toxicology of  F-ll*
Concentration
of Vapor. .
(mg x 10J/«J)
1,851
1,402
1,122
842
561
561
561
140; 280; 561

140-561
337
280

280
280
140

140
140
140
112

70
67


28-67
58
28
22

5.6
Exposure, Duration
or Regimen
Brief (H.S.)
30 *ln
S min
30 min
20 min
6 min
5 min
5 min

H.S.
4 hrs
20 min or repeated daily

5 min
5 min
5 min

5 min
5 min
3.4 hr/day 20 days
4 hrs

3. 5 hr/day 20 days
4 hr/day x 10 days


5 min
8 hr/day x 30 days
Br ief
6 hr/day x 28 days

90 days
Animals
Rat
Rabbit, g.p.
Rat
Rat
Rat
Mouse (anesthetized)
Rat (anesthetized)
Rat (unanesthetized)

Rat (anesthetized)
Rat
Rat, rabbit, dog

Monkey (anesthetized)
Mouse , dog
Caid Iomyopathlc hamster

Monkey (anesthetized)
Monkey
Cat, g. p. , rat
Card Iomyopathlc hamster

Dog
Rat


Dog
Rat, g.p.
Monkey and dog
Rat, mouse, g. p. ,
rabbit
Rat, g.p.
Effect(s)
Tremors
LC **
Lethal to some
LC
LoSS of reflex, anesthesia
A-V block
Cardiac arrythmias in all
Tachycardia, atrlal f ibrill. , ventric.
extrasystoles in some (incid. related to dose)
Dradycardia; also ectoplc beats at 561 mg/m
Lethal to some
Biochemical changes indicative of slowed
cellular respiration.
Tachycardia, ventric. premature beats, A-v block
SEIA*** ,
Cardiac arrythmias (compared to 561 x 10
mg/m in normal hamsters)
Tachycardia
SEIA
No signs of overt tox., no mortality
High mortality and reduced lethal times
compared to normal hamsters
No signs of overt tox., no mortality
Respiratory and neuroausc. signs of tox.,
(recovery after expos). Pathology In brain
liver, lungs; spleen changes
SEIA
No significant signs of tox.
Influence on circulatory system
No significant signs of tox.

Lung, liver changes
   Source:   U.S.  EPA,  1976

*  g.p.  denotes guinea pig
** ^tn  denotes ntedian lethal  concentration
***SEIA  denotes sens!tlzation  to  eplnephctne-Induced  arrhythmia
                                                 C-49

-------
                                                         TABLE  14

                                               Inhalation Toxicology of F-12*
Concentration
of Vapor.  ,
(rag x 103/m )
Exposure, Duration
    or Regimen
Animal
                            Effect(s)
 0,952
3,754
2,470
2,638(F11/F12, 1:1)

1,976
1,482-1,976
1,482

1,582(FU/F12, 1:1)
1,160(FU/F12, 1:1)
988
988

988
494, 988> 1,976
494; 988
494
494
494
247
247
41
4
30 rain
30 min
1 hr
30
U.S.
Brief (N.S.)
30 min
30 min
30 min
5 min
7-8 hr/day x 35-53 days

6 min
N.S.
N.S.
N.S.
5 min
3.5 hr/day x 20 days
5 min
5 min
8 hr/day x 5 day/wk x 30 days
Continuous, 90 days
Guinea pig,rabbit,rat
House
Rat
Guinea pig

Rat (anesthetized)
Rat
Rat
Rat
Mouse
Rat
Dog,monkey

Mice (anesthetized)
Rat (unanesthetized)
Rat (anesthetized)
Rat (anesthetized)
Monkey (anesthetized)
Rat,guinea pig,cat,dog
Monkey (anesthetized)
Dog
Guinea pig
Guinea pig
Anesthesia
Arrhythmia in •»; no ch. In heart rate
Tremors
Letnal to some
Tremors disappear after 2 wks- tolerance
and depressed wt. gain
No arrhythmias
Tachycardia, no arrhythmias
No change in heart rate, or arrhythmias
Arrhythmias in 10%
Ar rhy thmlas
No mortal, and no overt signs of tox.
No arrhythmias
SEIA***
Liver changes
Liver changes
*  Source:  U.S. EPA, 1976
** LCcQ denotes median lethal concentration

***SEIA denotes sens!tization to epinephrine-Induced arrhythmia
                                             :-so

-------
                                         TABLE 15

                       Bronchopulmonary and Cardiovascular Effects
                        (other than arrhythmia)  of F-ll and  F-12*
Effect
Tachycard ia
Myocardial
depression
Hypotension
Early respiratory
depression

Dronchoconstr iction

Decreased
compliance

Animal
Dog
Monkey
Dog
Monkey
Dog
Monkey
Dog
Monkey
Mouse
Rat
Dog
Monkey
Mouse
Rat
Dog
Monkey
Mouse
Rat
F-ll
Cone.** De^ree °S
response
56 ++ +
140 4-4-
140 ++
140 4-4-
140 ++
140 4-4-
561 +
280 +
140 4-4-
140 4-4-
0
0
56 4-4-
140 4-4-
0
0
56 4-4-
140 4-4-
F-12
Cone.** Degree °I
response
494 4-
494 +
494 4-
0
494 4-
988 4-
0 4-
247 4-
494 4-
494 4-
494 4-
99 4-
0
988 4-
494 4-
99 4-
494 4-
* Source:  U.S. EPA, 1976: Aviado, 1975b,c

**Approx. minimal concentration (10 mg/m ) producing response; 0 indicates absent or oppo-
  site responses

  4-, ++ or 4-4-4- indicate degree of  response


                                             C-51

-------
substances have been classified according to their cardiopulmonary



toxicities in  animal  studies,  as summarized in Table  16.   Of all



the aerosol propellants studied and classified  on  the basis  of car-



diopulmonary effects,  Aviado  (1975a)  concluded  that  P-ll  is the



most toxic and that the most serious effects are induction  of car-



diac arrhythmia and  sensitization to epinephrine-induced arrhyth-



mias.   The Underwriters  Laboratories (1971) classification system



for refrigerants is shown  in  Table 17.  In this  system F-ll and F-12



are in Toxicity  Classes  5 and 6,  respectively  (the  lowest two of



six classes).



     Several animal studies provide evidence that pre-existing car-



diac or pulmonary  lesions  (diseased  state) may enhance  the toxicity



(enhance toxic effect  or  reduce  the level of exposure required to



produce effect) of fluorocarbons (Taylor and  Drew,  1975;   Doherty



and Aviado, 1975;  Watanabe  and Aviado,  1975).   Also, Wills (1972)



demonstrated a dose related  (in range of 0.005 to 0.015 mg/kg) re-



sponse to epinephrine  (arrhythmic heart beats)  in subjects  briefly



exposed to F-ll at 49 x 10  mg/m  (0.87 percent by volume).  Thus,



exposure  to  the  fluorocarbons  (such  as  from  use  of propellant



bronchodilators or misuse of other  products),  in  combination with



use of cardioactive  drugs  or a  stressful situation increasing



endogenous epinephrine  levels, could  be  hazardous  and  present  a



toxic   risk greater than  that  from  either  factor  alone (U.S.  EPA,



1976;  Howard,  et al.  1974).



     Pathologic liver changes were reported  in guinea pigs chronic-



ally exposed (continuously for 90 days; or eight hours daily,  five



days weekly,  for six weeks)  to F-12 at levels of about 4,000 mg/m
                               C-52

-------
                                        TABLE  16

              Classification of Fluorocarbon and Other Propellant Compounds
              on the Basis of Cardiovascular and Bronchopulmonary Toxicity*
      Class and Compounds
                                                   Characteristics
I .
II
III.
IV.
Low Pressure Propellants of
High Toxicity
CCl^F (F-ll), CHC1?F(F-21)
CC12F-CC1F2(F-113)7 CH2C12,
and trichloroethane.

Low Pressure Propellants of
Intermediate Toxicity

CC1F2-CC1F2(F-114),
CClF2-CH3(F-142b),  isobutane
and octafluorocyclobutane
High Pressure Propellants
of Intermediate Toxicity

CC12F2(F-12),CHClF2(F-22),
propane, and vinyl chloride

High Pressure Propellants
of Low Toxicity

F-115 and F-125b
Toxic at 0.5-5% (v/v) in monkey and dog, and 1-10%
in rat and mouse.   Induce cardiac arrhythmias; sen-
sitize heart to epinephrine-induced arrhythmias;
cause tachycardia, myocardial depression, hypoten-
sion.  Primarily cardiovascular effects.

Sensitize to epinephrine--arrhythmia in  the dog at
5-25% (Cf. 0.5% or less for Class I).  Do not induce
arrhythmias in mouse (Class I do at 10-40%).  Affect
circulation in anesthetized dog and monkey at 10-20%
(Cf.  at 0.5-2.5% for Class I).  Cause bronchoconstric-
tion in dog (Class I compounds do not),  and, except
in this respect, are less toxic than those in
Class I.  Cardiovascular effects predominate.

Effective concentrations similar to Class II for car-
diosensitization and circulatory effects, but
respiratory depression and broncho-effects predomi-
nate over cardiovascular effects (in contrast to
Classes I and II).
                                        Extent of circulatory effects less than those of
                                        Class III.  Do not cause bronchoconstriction or
                                        early respiratory depression.
*Source: U.S. EPA, 1976; Aviado, 1975b
                                    C-53

-------
                         TABLE  17

        Comparative Acute Toxicity Classification
                      Refrigerants*
Toxicity    Concentration,      Exposure duration to
class       percent (v/v)       produce death or serious
                                injury in animals (hours)
   1          0.5-1           0.83 (5 min.)
   2          0.5-1           0.5
   3          2-2.5           1
   4          2-2.5           2
   5          Intermed.         Intermed.
   6             20             No injury after 2 hrs


*Source: Underwriters Labs, 1971
                         C-54

-------
 (0.08  percent by  volume)  (Prendergast,  et  al.  1967).    In  other



 chronic exposure  experiments  with rats,  guinea pigs, monkeys,  and



 dogs  exposed  to  F-ll at 5,610 mg/m   for  90  days or  at  57.5  x  10



 mg/m   for eight hrs/day  for five  days/week for  six  weeks;  pneumon-




 itic  changes  were  noted  in all test  groups (except  in dogs exposed



 intermittently),  liver changes were  noted  in  rats and guinea  pigs,



 and  serum  urea  nitrogen  was  elevated in exposed dogs (Jenkins,  et



 al. 1970).  Several  adverse changes  were  reported by  Karpov  (1963)



 in various species exposed to  F-22 (in same class  as and  chemically



 similar to F-12)  six hours daily  for  ten months  at 50.1 x 10   mg/m^




 (1.42  percent, v/v), including:  reduced  endurance in swimming test



 and  increased trials to establish conditioned  reflex (mice);  de-



 creased oxygen  consumption and  increase  in  the stimulus  strength




 required to induce  response  (rats);  several  hematologic and  blood



 chemistry changes  (rabbits) and degenerative  patnoanatomic changes



 in heart,  liver,  kidney,  nervous  system, and lungs (Clayton, 1966).



     Applications  of F-ll,  F-12   and  some  mixed fluorocarbons  re-



 peated twice  daily  over  several  weeks to  skin  and  oral  mucosa  of



 rats have produced  irritation, edema, and  inf lairmat ion.   These  ef-



 fects were most marked in the F-ll/F-22 mixture in older subjects.



The  healing  rate  of  burn  lesions was retarded  by  appliations  of



F-ll,  F-12  and  F-22  (Quevauviller,  et  al.  1964;   Quevauviller,




 1965).  The rapid evaporation of  fluorocarbons applied directly  to



 integumentary surfaces may result  in chilling or  freezing and may



 be the principal hazard  in acute  dermal exposure to  the  more  vola-



 tile compounds.   Dermal absorption and resulting systemic  coxicity



are more  important in the less volatile fluorocarbons.
                               C-55

-------
     Information on oral route toxicity is limited  (Howard, et al.
1974).   Acute  intragastric doses of F-ll at  7,380  mg/kg were re-
ported as  not  lethal  or  grossly  hepatoxic in rats  (Slater, 1965),
but Clayton (1966) noted that F-ll doses of 1,000 mg/kg  (in peanut
oil) were lethal in rats.
     In one chronic (90 day)  feeding  study of F-12 in rats at 35 and
350 mg/kg/day  Waritz  (1971) reported  somewhat  elevated urinary
fluoride  and  plasma alkaline phosphatase  levels.   No  changes in
dogs at  10  and 100 mg/kg/day were observed.   In a two-year study
using rats  intubated with  F-12 in corn oil at 15  and 150 mg/kg/day
there was some suppression of weight gain at the high dose level,
but no effects with respect  to clinical signs, liver function, he-
matology, or  histopathology  were noted.   There were no signs of
toxicity in dogs given 8 and  80 mg/kg daily  in their diet (Sherman,
1974).
Synergism and/or Antagonism
     Probably  the most obvious concern in regard  to this  aspect is
the cardiac  sensitization  by fluorocarbons  to  arrhythmogenic ef-
fects of circulating or administered  catecholamines  (e.g., epineph-
rine)  or  asphyxia.   Stress  situations  or certain  drugs taken in
conjunction with or as a component of fluorocarbon propellant prod-
ucts  may  present  an opportunity   for  synergistic  consequences
(Howard, et al. 1974).
Teratogenicity
     There  are no available data  on the  teratogenicity of halo-
methanes.
                               C-56

-------
Mutagen icity



     Information  on  the  mutagenicity of halomethanes is very  lim-



ited.  Recently,  however,  three groups  of  investigators have  re-



ported positive results with certain alkyl halides in the Ames  Sal-



monella typhimurium  test system  (Andrews,  et  al.  1976?  Jongen, et



al. 1978;  Simmon,  et al.  1977).   Because of  the  formal relationship



between molecular  events  involved in  mutagenesis and  carcinogenesis



(Miller,  1978;  Weinstein,   1978),  the  demonstration of mutagenic



activity for a substance  is  often taken  as presumptive evidence  for



the existence of  carcinogenic  activity  as well.  Therefore, it is



believed that an  investigation of  the mutagenicity of  xenobiotics



may be  predictive of carcinogenic potential  (but not  necessarily



potency),  and may  serve as  an early warning  of a possible threat to



human health where positive  results  are obtained.



     Simmon  and  coworkers   (1977)   reported  that   chloromethane,



bromomethane, bromodichloromethane,  bromoform, and dichloromethane



were all mutagenic to Salmonella typhimur ium strain  TA100 when  as-



sayed in a dessicator whose  atmosphere contained the  test compound.



Metabolic  activation was not required for  the  expression of muta-



genic effect, since  the  addition of  microsomes  was  not  necessary.



In all cases,  the  number  of  revertants per plate was  directly dose-



related.



     Interpretation of these data with regard  to carcinogenic risk,



however,  is complicated  by  several  factors.  Data  were generally



reported for only  one Salmonella  tester  strain,  and the  vapor-phase



exposure is one which  is not extensively employed for  mutagenesis



testing.   The number of  plates assayed  at each  dose was not indi-



cated, and  the  criteria used  for  determination  of  a  significant





                              C-57

-------
mutagenic response were not specified. If the most stringent eval-



uation criteria were  applied (in which the ratio  of: experimental -



control/control  must  exceed  2.5),  bromoform  and  bromodichloro-



methane would not be considered positive in this study.




     Confirmation of mutagenicity for all the  chemicals examined by



Simmon, et al.  (1977)  has  not  been  reported by other investigators,



either  in the  Ames  assay  or with  other test  systems.    However,



Andrews and coworkers  (1976)  have  demonstrated   that chloromethane



was mutagenic to Salmonella typhimur ium strain TA1535  in the pres-



ence and  absence of  added  liver homogenate  preparations.   Simmon,



et  al.    (1977)  indicated  that  although  dichloromethane  was muta-



genic in  the Ames assay, it did not  increase mitotic recombination



in  S_.  cerevis iae strain  D3.    In  addition,   it  was  reported that




dichloromethane was negative on testing for mutagenicity in Droso-



phila (Filippova, et al. 1967).



     The  positive  results  for  dichloromethane   in  the Ames assay



were recently confirmed by  Jongen,  et al.  (1978).  Using Salmonella



strains TA98  and  TA100, which  detect frameshift mutations, dose-



related increases in mutation rate were obtained using vapor phase



exposures (5,700 - 57,000  ppm).   The  addition  of  a microsomal prep-



aration was not  necessary  for  the production of mutations,  although



a slight  enhancement  in mutation  rate could  be  obtained  with rat




liver  homogenate.    An explanation  why  certain  halomethanes  are



mutagenic  in  the  Ames  assay  without the addition  of  a metabolic



activating system has not been  proposed.



     Mutagenicity data on the fluorocarbons are  scant.   Upon incu-



bation of labeled F-ll  (also CC1.,  CHC1, and halothane) with liver
                                4      J
                               :-58

-------
microsomes  and  NADPH  the  label was found to be bound  irreversibly



to endoplasmic  protein and lipid but was  not detected  in  ribosomal



RNA.   None  of  the compounds  was  mutagenic  in Salmonella  tester



strains TA1535 or 1538 with added liver  microsomes  (Uehleke,  et  al.



1977).   Sherman (1974) found   no  increase  in mutation rates over



controls in  a rat  feeding  study of F-12.  Stephens, et  al.   (1970)



reported significant mutagenic activity of F-12 at  2.47 x  10  mg/m



(50 percent)  in air in a Neurospora crassa  test system.



     Further  testing  is  obviously  required  to establish  the muta-



gneic potential of any or  all of the halomethanes.  Many investiga-



tors  agree  that a compound should  demonstrate positive results  in



at least two different short-term  assay  systems before  it  is  ac-



cepted as  a mutagen/carcinogen.  Nevertheless, based on  the pres-



ently  available mutagenicity  data,   it  seems  prudent  to  regard



chloromethane,   bromomethane,   bromoform,   dichloromethane,   and



bromodichloromethane as suspected mutagens/carcinogens pending  the



results of  further research.



Carcinogenicity



     Among   the   halomethanes,   only   chloroform,   carbon   tetra-



chloride, and iodomethane  are generally  regarded to be carcinogenic



in animals  (NAS, 1978).  Limited new data,  however, implicate sev-



eral additional compounds  as  potential  tumorigens.  These  data were



developed using the strain A mouse  lung tumor  assay system,  a bio-



assay which  is  known  for  its  extremely  high  sensitivity to both



strong and  weak carcinogens (Shimkin  and Stoner, 1975).  The  inter-



pretation of lung tumor data  in  the strain  A mouse  is   somewhat
                               C-59

-------
unique  in  that certain  specific  criteria  should  be met before  a

compound is considered positive:

      (a)  A significant  increase  in  the  mean  number of  lung
          tumors  in  test animals, preferably  to  one or  more
          per mouse, should be obtained.

      (b)  A dose-response relationship  should  be evident.

      (c)  The  mean  number  of  lung  tumors in  control  mice
          should be consistent with  the anticipated  incidence
          of spontaneous tumors for  untreated  strain A  mice.

     Theiss and  coworkers  (1977)  examined  the biological activity

of bromoform,  bromodichloromethane,  and  dichloromethane  in strain  A

mice.  Male animals,  six to  eight weeks old, were injected  intra-

peritoneally up to three  times weekly over a period of eight  weeks.

Three dose levels were employed with each  test  chemical,  represent-

ing  the maximum  tolerated  dose and  a 1:2  and  1:5  dilution  of  the

maximum  tolerated  dose.    Twenty animals  were used  at each dose

level,  including  negative   (tricaprylin,   saline)  and  positive

(urethan) controls.  Mice were sacrificed  24 weeks after  the first

injection and  the  frequency of lung  tumors in  each  test  group  was

statistically  compared  with   that  in the  vehicle-treated controls

using the Student  t test.

     The results  obtained  by  Theiss, et al. (1977)  are  summarized

in Table 18.   These  data indicate that in no  case were  all three

criteria met,  as indicated above, for the  establishment  of a posi-

tive response.   Nevertheless,  it  is  clear  that  bromoform produced  a

significant increase  in  tumor response at the intermediate dose.

In  addition,  d ichloromethane   at  the low   dose only, and bromodi-

chloromethane  at  the  high dose only,  produced results which were

marginally  significant.   Overall,  the  results of  this study  are
                               C-60

-------
                                                        TABLE 18
                                 Pulmonary Timor  Response  to Organic Water Contaminants*
Compound
Tr icaprylin
Dromoforn


Dromodichloromethane


D 1 c h lo rorae t hane


Urethane
0.9% NaCl solution
Dose/
Vehicle Injection
(mg/Kg)
Ta
T 4
48
100
T 20
40
100
T 160
400
800
S 1,000
S
No. of l.p.
Injections
24
18
23
24
18
24
24
17
17
16
1
24
Total dose No. of animals
(mg/kg) survivors/initial

72
1,100
2,400
360
960
2,400
2,720
6,800
12,800
1,000

15/20
17/20
15/20
15/20
15/20
16/20
13/20
18/20
5/20
12/20
20/20
47/50
No. of lung
tumors/mouse
0
0
1
0
0
0
.27 1
.53 +
.13 +
.67 +
.20 +
.25 +
0.85 +
0
0
0

0
.94 i
.80 +
.50 +
19.6
.19 +
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
t 2
0.
15b
21
36
21
11
11
27
03
5B
15
.4
06

0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.


P

335
04 1C
136
724
930
067
053
417
295


•Source: The 1ss,  et al.  1977
aTrIcaprylln,  S,  0.9% NaCl solution
 Average 4; S.E.
cp<0.05
                                                            C-61

-------
suggestive of  carcinogenic activity but do not  in  themselves  pro-



vide an adequate basis  for  the development  of  a  carcinogenic  based



risk  assessment  for  humans.   Moreover,  it has been stated  with



regard to the strain A mouse lung tumor  system  that,  "positive  com-




pounds require extension  to other systems, such as  lifetime  expo-



sure of rats"  (Shirnkin  and  Stoner,  1975).



     Unfortunately, there are little additional data to either  con-




firm or  deny the potential  carcinogenicity of  most  halomethanes.



Poirier  and  cowor
-------
however, only dichloromethane has been investigated for cell trans-
formation activity.
     Price,  et  al.  (1978)  reported  that Fischer rat  embryo  cells
(F1706) were transformed by dichloromethane at  high concentrations
         -3               -4
(1.6 x  10  M and  1.6  x 10  M)  in the growth medium.   In  addition,
transformed  cells produced  fibrosarcomas when injected  subcuta-
neous ly into newborn  rats.
     Further research  by Sivak  (1978) has  indicated,  however,  that
the observed cell transforming capability  of  dichloromethane may
have been due to impurities in  the test  material.   Sivak (1978)  re-
ported  that  when  the  experiments  of  Price, et al. (1978) were  re-
peated  using highly  purified  food grade dichloromethane  no  trans-
formation occurred.   Additional  studies were  conducted  by  Sivak
(1978)  in  which  food  grade   dichloromethane   was  tested  in  the
BALD/C-3T3 mouse cell  transformation assay system at  three  concen-
trations in  the growth medium.   Although  transformed  foci  were  ob-
served at all dose levels,  a dose-response relationship was not  re-
vealed, nor  were  the  number of foci  increased  relative  to  results
with untreated  controls.   Difficulty  in  the  interpretation of  these
results, however, arises from the fact  that dichloromethane  (boil-
ing point, 40°C)  was  added to   the growth  medium and   incubated at
37°C for 72  hours.   Thus,  the  possibility exists that  significant
losses of the  test material due to  volatilization from the growth
medium may have occurred.
     The degree to which carcinogenic impurities may have  accounted
for the  biological activity attributed to dichloromethane in in
vitro test systems is not  known.  This  problem  may be  particularly
                               C-63

-------
relevant  to  the  halomethanes,  since high  concentrations of  test



chemical must be employed for expression of mutagenic/carcinogenic



effects.   It  has been established  that  misleading results can  be



obtained with  the  Ames  assay due to  trace  level contamination  by



carcinogenic impurities (Donahue, et al.  1978),  and a  similar situ-



ation probably  exists  with mammalian cell  transformation assays.



Sivak  (1978)  reported  that  impurities  present   in  food  grade di-



chloromethane   included:  cyclohexane  (305  ppm),  transdichloro-



ethylene (86 ppm), vinyldene chloride (33 ppm),  methyl bromide (11



ppm), chloroform (  10 ppm),  carbon  tetrachloride  (  5 ppm)  and ethyl



chloride (3 ppm).   Therefore,  the  results  of  sensitive assays  in



which technical grade material  is employed must be  interpreted with



the  knowledge  that  low  level contamination  may  contribute to ob-



served biological effects.



     Careinogenicity data on the fluorocarbons are scant.   No human



or animal  data  on carci nogenici ty  from  exposure to  F-ll  or F-12



were available.  However, concern about possible  increased risk  of



cancer resulting indirectly  from the  use of  fluorocarbons has de-



veloped  in recent years.   The  possibility  that  increasing use and



release  of  fluorocarbons  to the  atmosphere  may  contaminate  the



stratosphere  and  cause  depletion  of  protective,  ultraviolet-



absorptive   ozone has  been  recognized.     The   following  adverse



effects from increased  penetration  of  UV  radiation to  the biosphere



are  suspected:   (a)  increased  incidence  of skin  cancer  in humans



(estimated  at  20 to  35 percent  increase for  10 percent ozone deple-



tion); (b)  altered animal cancer and disease patterns; (c) reduced
                               C-64

-------
growth  and  productivity  of  plants;  and  (d)  climatic changes  and



ecologic  shifts  (U.S. EPA, 1976).



     A  number  of studies  have  sought  to establish an  association



between trihalomethane  levels  in municipal drinking water  supplies



and  the  incidence of cancers  in  the U.S. population  (NAS,  1978).



Several  epidemiologic  studies have  shown  positive   correlations



between certain  cancer  death rates  (various  sites) and  water  qual-



ity  indices,  including  water  source,   chlorination,  and  trihalo-



methanes  (Cantor and McCabe,  1977,  citing Cantor, et  al.  1978  and



Salg, 1977).   Cantor,  et  al.  (1978) have  also reported  positive



associations  between cancer mortality  rates  (several sites)  and



brominated  trihalomethanes (BTHM).   BTHM is  comprised  mostly  of



bromodichloromethane  and chlorodibromomethane, but measurable  le-



vels of  tribromomethane have  been  found in some water supplies.



The authors caution that these  studies  have  not been controlled  for



all confounding  variables, and  the  limited  monitoring  data that



were available  may  not  have accurately reflected past  exposures.



Thus the need  was recognized  for  further studies which  will utilize



exposure and disease information from individuals, rather than from



population  aggregates.   However,  based  on  the epidemiologic evi-



dence which is  presently available,  it  is  felt  that  sufficient



justification exists  for  maintaining  a  hypothesis  that observed



positive  correlations  between  drinking water  quality  and cancer



mortality may be attributable  to the  presence of trihalomethanes



(U.S.  EPA, 1978a).
                               C-65

-------
                    CRITERION FORMULATION



Existing Guidelines and Standards



Chloromethane



     1.  A warning label is required  by  Federal  Insecticide, Fungi-



cide and Rodenticide Act  (FIFRA).   Interpretation  is with respect



to warning, caution, and antidote statements required to appear on



labels of economic poisons  (27 FR 2267).



     2.  Food tolerance requirement of Federal Food, Drug and Cos-



metic Act:  chloromethane  is permitted as the propellant in pesti-



cide formulations,  up  to  30 percent  of  finished formulation, when



used in food storage/processing  areas not  contacting fatty foods.



27 FR 4623.



     3.  Human  exposure:   (1)  A maximum permissible concentration



(MFC) of 5  mg/m   in industrial plant  atmospheres was established in



Russia  based  on   rat  studies  of  chronic  poisoning  (Evtushenko,



1966);  (2)  OSHA  (L976)  has  established the maximum acceptable time-



weighted average air concentration for daily eight-hour occupation-



al exposure at  210 mg/m with ceiling and peak (five minutes during



(or in) any three hours) concentration values of 413 and 620 mg/m  ,



respectively.



     4.  Multimedia Environmental Goals, (MEG)  Estimated Permissi-



ble Concentrations  (EPC) (U.S.  EPA, 1977):








          EPC,  air, health:                  0.5 mg/m



          EPC,  water, health (1):            7.5 mg/1



          EPC,  water, health (2):            2.9 mg/1



          EPC,  land, health:                 5.8 mg/kg
                            C-66

-------
Bromome thane



     1.   A  warning  and  antidote  labeling is  required by  FIFRA.



Interpretation  with  respect  to  warning,  caution,   and   antidote



statements is required to appear on labels of  economic poisons   (27



FR 2267).



     2.   Food tolerance  limits  required  under Federal Food, Drug



and Cosmetic Act Tolerances for residues  of inorganic  bromides  re-



sulting  from fumigation  with  methyl bromide.   22 FR 5682  and sub-



sequent  regulations  set  inorganic bromide  residue  concentration



limits for many  food  commodities  at levels ranging from 20  to  400



mg/kg.



     3.   Human  Exposure:   (1) Occupational exposure during  eight-



hour work day limited to  78 mg/m  by the  Texas State Department of



Health;  also regulated are use periods for respirators  (Tex. State



Dep.  Health, 1957); (2) OSHA  (1976) has established the eight-hour



air concentration  ceiling for occupational exposure  at 80  mg/m  ,



with an  added  warning of  skin  exposure   hazard;  (3)  The  American



National  Standards Institute  has  set  a standard of 58 mg/m  time-



weighted  average air  concentration for  an  eight-hour  day, with



interlocking period ceilings of 97 mg/m , and  194 mg/m  (five min-



utes)   (Am.   Natl.  Stand.  Inst.,   1970);   (4)  The  industrial  TLV



(threshold limit value) of 78 mg/m  to prevent neurotoxic  and pul-



monary  effects   was  established  by  the  American Conference  of



Governmental Industrial Hygienists  (Stokinger, et al.   1963;  ACGIH,



1971).
                               C-67

-------
Dichloromethane
     1.  As  an  oil and fat solvent, dichloromethane  is allowed  in
spice oleoresins at  up to  30  mg/kg and in decaffeinated coffee  at
up to 10 mg/kg  (21 CFR  121.1039).
     2.  Human  exposure:   (1) OSHA (1976) has established occupa-
tional exposure standards as  follows:   eight-hour  time weighted av-
erage  (TWA),  1,737 mg/m ;  acceptable ceiling concentration,  3,474
mg/m ; and acceptable maximum  peak  above ceiling,  6,948 mg/m   (five
minutes in any  three hours).    (2) However, in recognition of meta-
bolic  formation of  COHb  and  additive   toxicity  with CO,  NIOSH
(1976a) has recommended a ten-hour workday TWA exposure  limit  of  75
ppm (261 mg/m )  in  the  presence of no more  CO  than  9.9  mg/m  TWA and
a 1,737 mg/m  peak (15 min. sampling);  in  the case of  higher CO le-
vels, lower levels of dichloromethane are required.   (3) Permissi-
ble exposure levels  in  several other countries range  from 49  up  to
1,737 mg/m  (maximum allowable concentration)  or 2,456 mg/m  (peak)
(discussed in NIOSH,  1976a).   (4)  The maximum permissable concen-
tration for dichloromethane in  water  in  the  U.S.S.R.  is 7.5 mg/1;
this is  intended  to  be proportionately reduced in the presence  of
other limited compounds (Stofen, 1973).
     3.  MEG values  for Estimated Permissible Concentrations  (U.S.
EPA, 1977):
     EPC, air,  health:        0.619 mg/m
     EPC, water, health (1)   9.18  mg/1
     EPC, water, health (2)   3.59  mg/1
     EPC, land, health:       7.2   mg/kg
                               C-68

-------
Tr ibromomethane



     Human  exposure:   (1) The OSHA Occupational Exposure  Standard



for workroom air (eight-hour TWA) is 5 mg/m ,  with  a  dermal absorp-



tion warning  notation  (OSHA,  1976).  (2) Tribromomethane is one  of



four trihalomethanes comprising  the group "total  trihalomethanes"



(TTHM)  for  which the U.S. EPA has  proposed  to regulate a maximum



contaminant level in drinking water  (0.100 mg/1).



Bromod ichloromethane



     Human exposure:  (1) There is no currently established occupa-



tional exposure  standard  for bromodichloromethane  in the U.S.   (2)



Bromodichloromethane, along  with chlorodibromomethane,   trichloro-



methane  (chloroform) and tribromomethane  form  the group of halo-



methanes termed  total trihalomethanes (TTHM),  which are  to  be regu-



lated in finished drinking water  in  the  U.S.   The maximum permissi-



ble concentration set for TTHM in the proposed regulations  is 0.100



mg/1.



Trichlorofluoromethane and Dichlorodifluoromethane



     Food use:   FDA regulations  permit use  of dichlorodifluoro-



methane  (F-12)  as  a direct  contact  freezing  agent  for food,  and



specify labeling and instructions for use  (32 FR  6739).



     Human exposure:   (1) The  current OSHA eight-hour TWA occupa-



tional  standards for F-ll  and  F-12 are  5,600  and  4,950 mg/m  ,



respectively (OSHA,  1976).  (2) Underwriters Laboratories  classify



F-ll  and F-12   in  groups  5  and  6,   respectively   (see  Effects



section).



     Other:    (1) F-ll,  F-12,  and several other fluorocarbons have



been  exempted   from  regulation  under  the Texas  Clean   Air  Act
                              C-69

-------
(Howard, et al. 1974).   (2) The U.S. EPA has  requested  that pesti-



cide formulators seek suitable alternative  propellants  for products



dispensed as aerosols, in view of  the ozone depletion concern.   (3)



Pressurized  containers  must  meet Interstate  Commerce Commission



(ICC)  regulations  for compressed  gases  to be shipped   (Howard, et



al.  1974, citing DuPont, 1973).



     Standard for regulation of trihalomethanes:   The U.S.  EPA  has



considered  the  available  health  and  exposure data  for  trihalo-



methanes as a group, determined that  they represent a potential  yet



reducible hazard to public health, and proposed regulations estab-



lishing a maximum  contaminant level  (MCL)  of 0.100 mg/1 for total



trihalomethanes (TTHM) in finished drinking water  of cities greater



than 75,000 (served population) employing added disinfectants (U.S.



EPA, 1978a).  A detailed  discussion  of the background  (rationale,



extrapolation models, and  interpretations  used)   for this standard



is beyond  the scope of this document.



Special Groups at Risk



     Perhaps the greatest  concern for special risk considerations



among the halomethanes is that for dichloromethane.  In this case,



the added  threat  is for  those such  as smokers or workers  in whom



significant COHb  levels  exist, or  those  with  pre-existing  heart



disease,  for  whom  COHb   formation  by dichloromethane metabolism



would present an added stress  or  precipitate  an  episode from dis-



turbed oxygen  transport.   NIOSH,  recognizing this combined stress



hazard, has  recommended  lowering the  existing TLV  for dichloro-



methane and tying it with existing CO exposure levels.
                               C-70

-------
     A  second  possible special risk concerns exposures  to  fluoro-
carbon  vapors.   In  this case  there  is evidence  that  a  characteris-
tic  toxicity  involves  sensitization to  cardioarrhythmogenic  ef-
fects of  endogenous  or  administered epinephrine and related  cate-
cholamines.  An  individual with cardiac  disease taking  certain med-
ication or in an acutely stressed  state  may  be  especially  suscepti-
ble to  fluorocarbon  cardiotoxicity.
Basis and Derivation of Criteria
     Data on current levels of the halomethanes in water,  food,  and
ambient air are  not  sufficient to permit adequate estimates of  to-
tal human exposures  from these media.   Available data  discussed  in
an earlier  section  of  this report  (Occurrence)  indicate that  the
greatest  human  exposure  to the trihalomethanes occurs through  the
consumption of liquids  (including  drinking water and  beverages con-
taining  it),   and  that exposure  to  chlorofluorocarbons, chloro-
methane,  dichloromethane,and  bromomethane  occurs  primarily by  in-
halation.
     Observed correlations among concentrations of trihalomethanes
in finished water are attributed to the presence of  common organic
precursor materials  in raw  water  (NAS,  1978).    Among  the  halo-
methanes  considered  in  this  report, bromodichloromethane seems  to
predominate in  drinking waters.   Concentrations of  bromodichloro-
methane in raw and finished water  samples are generally in the area
of 6 pg/1 or less, and thus represent a reasonable upper  limit  for
anticipated levels of any  halomethane in  water (excluding chloro-
form and carbon  tetrachloride).
                               C-71

-------
     Recent reports showing that chloromethane, bromomethane,  tri-
bromomethane,  dichloromethane,  and  bromodichloromethane  exhibit
carcinogenic and/or mutagenic  effects in certain bioassay systems
suggests  the  need  for  conservatism  in  the development  of  water
quality  criteria  for  the  protection  of human  health.   Since  the
presently available carcinogenicity data base  for these compounds
is judged qualitatively  informative but quantitatively inadequate
for  risk  extrapolation,  an alternative  approach  is  necessary  for
criteria development.
     The  halomethanes  included  in  this document  have  not  been
adequately  tested  for  carcinogenicity.    However,  bromomethane,
chloromethane, dichloromethane, tribromomethane and bromodichloro-
methane  have been found  to be mutagenic  in  the  Ames  test without
metabolic activation  (Simmon et al.  1977).   Based  on the  demon-
strated  if variable relationship between positive responses  in  the
Ames assay  and  positive  results  in cancer bioassays (Purchase, et
al.  1978),  the mutagenicity data suggest that  these  compounds may
pose a carcinogenic risk.   In  the  absence of carcinogenic data in
mammalian species,  the U.S. EPA's  Carcinogen Assessment Group has
considered the structural similarity of chloroform with these halo-
methanes as well  as their  mutagenic activity,  and has recommended
that the  criterion for  the class be  identical to that of chloro-
form.  The major  drawback of  this approach is that relatively minor
structural changes in a molecule  can have a  profound effect on  car-
cinogenic potency.  Consequently,  it  cannot be determined whether
this criteria  is  protective of carcinogenic risk.   The criterion
for  chloroform is 1.9 ug/1 (see Appendix 1).
                               C-'

-------
     An alternative approach  is to derive criteria for the individ-
ual halomethanes  based  on  the available  toxicity  data.
Chlo route thane:
     There  are  no reports  in the published literature  concerning
the toxicity  of Chloromethane resulting  from chronic  oral exposure
in  either  laboratory animals or  man.   However,  human  experience
with Chloromethane in the workplace has provided a fairly extensive
data base concerning its inhalation toxicity in man.   Consequently,
the currently recommended  ACGIH TLV of  100  ppm is based  upon  the
known  CNS  effects of  inhaled Chloromethane  in humans.    This  TLV
represents an acceptable  8-hour time-weighted  average exposure  in
the workplace.  Exposure to the general population,  however,  should
be considerably less since  worker  groups  are assumed  to  be healthy
and are not continuously exposed.
     A  water  quality criterion for Chloromethane  based  upon  the
ACGIH TLV of  100  ppm (210 mg/m  ) can be derived using the approach
of Stokinger  and Woodward  (1958).   It  must be  recognized, however,
that assumptions must be made  in  the estimation of equivalent oral
doses from inhalation data.   This  involves primarily  an  approxima-
tion of  the efficiency  of  inhalation absorption  and the average
breathing rate.   Thus  a safety factor of 100  is included  in  the
derivation in order to provide a wider  margin of safety in light  of
the uncertainty in these assumptions.   This calculation for Chloro-
methane is illustrated as follows:
          210 mg/m  x 50 m  /week x 0.50*
          	7 days/week  x  100**	  = 7'5  mg/day
      *Estimated  coefficient  of absorption via inhalation and  in-
       gestion
     **Safety factor
                               C-73

-------
Assuming a daily water consumption of 2  liters,  the  acceptable con-
centration of chloromethane would  be 3.8  mg/liter on the basis of
noncarcinogenic  risks.   Note  that  bioconcentration is considered
not to occur with chloromethane,
Bromomethane:
     Similar to  the case with chloromethane, a  large data base ex-
ists regarding  the human  toxicity  of inhaled bromomethane whereas
little is known concerning the effects of  chronic  ingestion by lab-
oratory  animals or  man.   The current  ACGIH TLV of  20  ppm (77.6
mg/m } for bromomethane can be used for  derivation of a water qual-
ity crtierion  based  upon  the  approach of  Stokinger and Woodward
(1958).  However, the same precautions apply to  this derivation for
bromomethane by  this  approach as for chloromethane.   The TLV ap-
proach  is  considered  worthwhile,  nevertheless,  since  the  TLV is
based upon the  systemic toxicity produced in humans  which has been
well documented.  This calculation for bromomethane  is illustrated
as follows:
          77.6 mg/m3 x 50 m3***/week x 0.50*    -  __  „„,,,,,,
          	 7 days/Week x 100**	 =  2'77  mg/day
       *Estimated coefficient of absorption via inhalation vs.  in-
        gestion
      **Safety  factor
     ***Estimated weekly respiratory  volume  during a 40  hr work week
Assuming a daily water consumption of 2  liters,  the  acceptable con-
centration of bromomethane would  be  1.39  mg/liter on the basis of
noncarcinogenic  risks.  Since  no bioconcentration  factor  is availa-
ble for  bromomethane,  it  is not  known how the consumption of fish
and shellfish may alter the acceptable level for  water.
                               C-74

-------
Dichloromethane:
     The toxicity of dichloromethane has not been studied by chron-
ic ingestion  in  laboratory  animals.   However,  a chronic study  has
been undertaken  by  the National Cancer  Institute which may  provide
the necessary dose-response data for criterion  formulation  once  it
is published.   Considerable human experience with dichloromethane
in the workplace has led to the development of  an ACGIH TLV  for  in-
halation exposure.  A limit of  200 ppm  (694 mg/m ) has been recom-
mended  for  protection against  excessive carboxyhemoglobin  forma-
tion.  Previously, a limit of 500  ppm had been  proposed  for  preven-
tion of narcotic effects or liver  injury.  Using the Stokinger  and
Woodward  (1958)  approach  as discussed above,  a water quality cri-
terion may be derived from  the TLV as illustrated below:
          694 mg/m3 x 50m3/week x  0.50*    = 24>8 mg day
                  7 days/week x 100**

      *Estimated coefficient  of absorption via  inhalation  vs.   in
       gestion
     **Safety factor
Assuming a daily water  intake of  2 liters, and the consumption  of
6.5 g of fish and shellfish  per  day (bioconcentration factor 0.91),
the derived water quality criterion would be 12.4 mg/liter based  on
noncarcinogenic  risks.
Tr ibromomethane:
     Quantitative  dose-response  information   regarding  tribromo-
methane toxicity is very limited.   In  particular chronic exposure
studies have not been published in sufficient detail to  be  used  as
the basis for criterion formulation.  Suggestive  evidence  of car-
cinogenic activity for tribromomethane (i.e.,  in the Strain  A mouse
                               C-75

-------
pulmonary  tumor  assay) is  not  adequate  for quantitative  risk  as-
sessment.  Furthermore, since the ACGIH TLV for  tribromomethane  is
based primarily upon  irritation  as  the toxic end-point,  it is  also
inappropriate  for  use as  the   basis  for  criterion  formulation.
Therefore, pending  the results  of chronic  bioassay  studies,  it  is
not presently  possible to derive a  valid  water quality  criterion
for tribromomethane.
Bromodichloromethane:
     The human  toxicity  of bromodichloromethane has not  been  sys-
tematically studied,  nor  has its chronic toxicity  in other animals
been reported  in  great detail.   In  two studies where mice  were  ex-
posed by gavage for 90 days at a dose of 125 mg/kg/day,  effects  on
cellular  defense  mechanisms  were  noted  (Schuller  et  al.  1978;
Munson  et  al.  1977).   However,  since  dose-response relationships
were not reported,  this free standing adverse effects  level cannot
be used  for  criteria  derivation.  Furthermore,  there  are  no TLVs
for  human  exposure  to   bromodichloromethane   in   the  workplace.
Therefore, it  is  not  presently  possible  to derive  a  valid water
criterion for bromodichloromethane based on noncarcinogenic risks.
Dichlorod ifluoromethane:
     Evidence for mutagenicity of dichlorodifluoromethane  is equi-
vocal and there is  no  evidence as yet for carcinogenic!ty  as a  re-
sult of  direct exposure.   Chronic  toxicity data  for  dichlorodi-
fluoromethane is quite limited.   In  the only long-term (two years)
feeding  study  reported (U.S.  EPA,  1976,  citing Sherman,  1974)  the
maximum  dose level  producing  no-observed-adverse-effect  (in dogs)
was 80  mg/kg/day.  Applying  an uncertainty factor  of 1000  (NAS,
                               C-76

-------
1977)  to  this  data yields a presumptive "acceptable daily  intake"



of 0.08 mg/kg/day.  For a man weighing 70 kg, consuming  two  liters



of  water  per  day and  absorbing at  100  percent  efficiency,  and



assuming  that   the  water  is  the  sole  source  of  exposure,  this



acceptable  intake  level  translates  into  a  criterion  level  as



follows:  (0.08)  (70)/2 = 2.8 mg/1.



Trichlorofluoromethane:



     There  is   no  evidence  for  mutagenicity  of  trichlorofluoro-



methane, and no evidence as yet  for carcinogenicity as a  result  of



direct exposure.  The only data  on toxicity  testing using  prolonged



exposure  at  relatively low  test concentrations  is from  a  report



{Jenkins, et al.   1970)  in  which no adverse effects were observed



in rats and guinea pigs  exposed  continuously  by inhalation  for  90



days at 5,610 mg/m .  If the reference man weighing 70 kg breathed



this atmosphere and absorbed  the  compound at 50  percent efficiency,



his estimated exposure dose  would be  5,610  x  23 (24 hour respira-



tory volume  in  m )  x 0.5 = 64,515 mg/day  or 922 mg/kg/day.  Applying



an uncertainty  factor  of 1,000   (NAS,  1977) to  this data yields a



presumptive  "acceptable daily intake" of 0.922  mg/kg/day for  tri-



chlorofluoromethane.    Assuming  man's weight  to be 70  kg and his



absorption of  ingested compound  to  be 100  percent efficient, and



that  his  sole   source  of  exposure  is  water   consumed  at  two



liters/day,  the  acceptable  intake is translated  into  a criterion



level as follows:  (0.922) (70)/2 = 32.3 mg/1.
                              C-77

-------
     In summary,  criterion  levels intended  to  protect  the public
against noncarcinogenic effects  resulting from exposure to selected
halomethanes are as follows:
          Compound                     mg/1
          Chloromethane                 3.8
          Bromomethane                  1.4
          Dichloromethane              12.4
          Tribromomethane                *
          Bromodichloromethane           *
          Dichlorofluoromethane         2.8
          Trichlorofluoromethane       32,3

     *No criterion derived
                               C-78

-------
                            REFERENCES







Ahmed, A.E., et al.  1977.  Metabolism of  haloforms  to  carbon  mon-



oxide. I.  In vitro studies.  Drug Metab. Dispos.   5:  198.   (Abst.)







Allen  and  Hanburys.   1971.  An investigation of  possible  cardio-



toxic effects of the aerosol propellants,  Arctons  11  and  12.   Vol.



1.   (Unpubl. rep.}







American  Conference of  Governmental  and  Industrial  Hygienists.



1971.  Documentation of  the  threshold limit values for substances



in workroom air.  Cincinnati, Ohio.







American National  Standards  Institute.   1970.   American national



standard  for  acceptable  concentrations  of methyl bromide  (mono-



bromomethane).   ANSI Z37.24.







Andrews, A.W.,  et  al.   1976.   A comparison of the mutagenic prop-



erties  of  vinyl  chloride  and methyl  chloride.    Mutat.   Res.



40: 273.







Araki, S., et al. 1971.   Methyl bromide poisoning.  A report based



on fourteen cases.   Jap. Jour.   Ind. Health.  13: 507.







Archer, V.E. 1973.   Letter to editor.  Br. Med. Jour.   3: 5882.
                               C-79

-------
Astrand, I., et al. 1975.  Exposure to methylene chloride.   I.  Its



concentration  in  alveolar  air  and blood  during  rest and exercise



and  its metabolism.    Scand.   Jour.   Workplace  Environ.  Health.



1: 78.







Aviado, D.M,   1975a.   Toxicity of aerosol propellents on the  res-



piratory and circulatory systems.   IX.  Summary of  the most  toxic:



Trichlorofluoromethane (FC-11).  Toxicology.   3: 311.








Aviado, D.M.   1975b.   Toxicity of aerosol propellants on the  res-



piratory and   circulatory  systems.   X.  Proposed  classification.



Toxicology.  3: 321.







Aviado,  D.M.     1975c.    Toxicity  of   aerosols.    Jour.  Clin.



Pharmacol.   15: 86.







Avilova, G.G., et al.    1973.    Itogi  Navki  Tekh.,  Farmakol.,



Khimioter.   Svedstva,  Toksikol.  Probl. Toksikol.   5:  92.    (Rus.)



(Abst.)







Azar,  A.,  et  al.   1972.    Experimental human exposures to fluoro-



carbon  12   (dichlorofluoromethane).   Am.  Ind. Hyg.  Assoc.  Jour.



33: 207.







Azar,  A.,  et  al.   1973.    Blood  levels  of fluorocarbon related  to



cardiac sensitization.  Am. Ind. Hyg.  Assoc. Jour.   34: 102.B
                               C-80

-------
Baird,  T.T.    1954.   Methyl  chloride poisoning.   Br.  Med.  Jour.



2: 1353.








Balander, P.A. and M.G.  Polyak.   1962. Toxicological characteriza-



tion of  methyl bromide.   Gig.  i  Toksikol.  Novykh.    Pestitsidov  i



Klinika Otravlenii, Dokl. 2-oi  (Vtoroi) Vses. Konf.  412.







Ballantyne, B. ,  et al.    1976.   The  ophthalmic  toxicology of  di-



chloromethane.  Toxicology.   6: 173.







Balmer,  M.F.,  et  al.   1976.    Effects  in  the  liver of methylene



chloride  inhaled   alone  and  with  ethyl   alcohol.    Am.  Ind.  Hyg.



Assoc. Jour.   37:  345.







Barnsley, E.A.  1964.  The metabolism of S-methyl-L-cysteine in  the



rat.   Biochem. Biophys.  Acta.    90:  24.







Barnsley, E.A.  and L. Young.  1965.   Biochemical studies of  toxic



agents.  The metabolism of  iodomethane.   Biochem. Jour. 95: 77.







Bass, M.   1970.   Sudden sniffing  death.   Jour. Am.  Med. Assoc.



212:  2075.








Benatt, A.J. and T.R.B.  Courtney.   1948.   Uraemia in  methyl  bromide



poisoning: Case report.   Br. Jour.  Ind. Med.  5: 21.
                               C-81

-------
Blake,  D.A.  and G.W. Mergner.   L974.    Inhalation  studies on  the
                                       14
biotransformation  and  elimination  of  (  C)-trichlorofluoromethane
      14
and  (  C)-dichlorodifluoromethane  in  beagles.    Toxicol.  Appl.
Pharmacol.  30: 396.
Bowman, F.G.,  et  al.   1978.   The toxicity of some halomethanes in
mice.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.  44: 213.


Boyland, E., et al.  1961.   Metabolism of  polycyclic compounds.  18.
The  secretion of  naphthalene  1:2-dihydronaphthlene and l:2-epoxy-
1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapthalene  in  rat  bile.  Biochem. Jour. 78: 376.


Bridbord, K. ,  et  al.   1974.   Exposure to halogenated hydrocarbons
in the  indoor  environment.  Presented at Conf. Publ. Health Impli-
cations of Plastic Manufacturing, Pinehurst, North Carolina.


Browning,  E.   1965.   Toxicity  and  Metabolism  of Industrial Sol-
vents.  Elsevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam.


Bruhin, J.  1943.   Deutsches  Gesund Gerichtles Medicine 37, A253.
Thesis.  Zurich, Switzerland.    (See  von Oettingen, 1964).


Campbell, K.  1978.   Unpubl.  data.
                               C-82

-------
Cantor, K.P. and L.J. McCabe.   1977.   The  epidemiologic  approach to



the evaluation of organics in drinking water.   In; Proc. Conf.  Wa-



ter Chlorination: Environ. Impact and Health Effects.  Gatlinburg,



Tennessee, Oct. 31 - Nov. 4.







Cantor, K.P., et al.   1978.  Associations  of halomethanes in drink-



ing water  with cancer mortality.   Jour.  Natl. Cancer  Inst.    61:



979.







Carlsson,  A.  and M.  Hultengren.   1975.    Exposure  to methylene


                               14
chloride.  III.  Metabolism of   C-labeled methylene dichloride  in



rat.  Scand. Jour. Work Environ. Health.  1: 104.







Carter, V.L., et al.   1970a.   Effects  of inhalation of freon 113  on



laboratory  animals.    Rep.  AD   727524.   Natl.  Tech.  Inf.   Serv.



Springfield, Virginia.
                                                                on
Carter, V.L.,  et  al.   1970b.   Effect  of bromotrifluoromethane



operant behavior in monkeys.  Toxicol.  Appl. Pharmacol.  17: 307.
Chiou, W.L.  and 5.  Niazi.    1973.   A  simple  and ultra-sensitive



headspace gas chromatographic method for the assay of fluorocarbon



propellants  in  blood.    Res.  Commun.   Chem.  Pathol.  Pharmacol.



6: 481.







Chopra,  N.M.  and L.R.  Sherman.    1972.   Systemic studies  on  the



breakdown of p,p'-DDT in tobacco smokes.   Anal.  Chem.  44: 1036.
                               C-83

-------
Clark, D.G. and D.J. Tinston. 1972a.   The influence  of  fluorocarbon



propellants on the  arrythmogenic activities of adrenaline and  iso-



prenaline.  Proc. Eur.  Soc.  Study Drug Toxic.  13:  212.







Clark, D.G. and  D.J.  Tinston.  1972b.  Cardiac  effects of  isopro-



terenol,  hypoxia,   hypercapnia,  and   fluorocarbon  propellants and



their use  in asthma inhalers.  Ann. Allergy.  30: 536.







Clarke, C.A.,  et al.   1945.   Methyl  bromide poisoning: Account of



four recent cases met  with in one of H.M.  ships.   Br. Jour.  Ind.



Med.  2: 17.







Clayton, J.W.   1966. The mammalian toxicology of organic compounds



containing fluorine.  Handbuch Exp. Pharmakol.  20: 459.







Collier, H.  1936.   Methylene dichloride  intoxication  industry - a



report of  two cases.  Lancet.  1: 594.







Collins, R.P.   1965.   Methyl  bromide poisoning:  A bizarre  neuro-



logical disorder.  Calif. Med.  103:   112.







Cox, P.J., et al.   1972.   A  comparison of the interactions  of  tri-



chlorofluoromethane  and  carbon  tetrachloride  with  hepatic cyto-



chrome P-450.   Biochem. Jour.  130: 87.







Cox, R.A., et  al.   1976.   Photochemical oxidation of halocarbons in



the troposphere.   Atmos.  Environ.  10: 305.
                               :-34

-------
Cronn, D.R., et al.  1976.  Measurement of  tropospheric  halocarbon



by gas  chromatography  - mass  spectrometry.   Rep. Phase  I of  EPA



Grant No.  R0804033-01.    U.S.  EPA, Research  Triangle Park,  North



Carolina.







Davis, L.N., et al.  1977.   Investigation  of selected  potential  en-



vironmental contaminants:  Monohalomethanes.   EPA 560/2-77-007; TR



77-535.   Final rep. June,  1977, on Contract No.   68-01-4315.  Off.



Toxic Subst. U.S. EPA,  Washington, D.C.







Dennis,   N.M.,  et  al.   1972.   Formation  of  methyl chloride during



methyl bromide fumigations.  Jour. Econ. Entomol.  65: 1753.







DiVincenzo, G.D.  and M.L.  Hamilton.   1975.   Fate  and disposition of


 14
(   C) methylene  chloride   in  the  rat.   Toxicol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.



32: 385.







DiVincenzo, G.D.,  et al.   1972.    Human and  canine  exposures to



methylene chloride vapor.   Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Jour.  33:  125.







Dixon, M.  and  D.M.  Needham.   1946.   Biochemical  research  on  chem-



ical warfare agents.  Nature.   158: 432.







Doherty, R.E.  and D.M.  Aviado.  1975.  Toxicity of aerosol  propel-



lants on the respiratory and  circulatory  systems.  VI.    Influence



of cardiac and pulmonary vascular lesions in  the  rat.  Toxicology.



3: 213.
                               C-85

-------
Donahue, E.V.,  et al.  1978.  Detection  of mutagenic impurities  in
carcinogens  and  noncarcinogens by  high-pressure  liquid chromato-
graphy and the Salmonella/Microsome test. Cancer Res.   38:  431.

Drawneek, W. ,  et al. 1964.  Industrial  methylbromide poisoning  in
fumigators.  Lancet.  2: 855.

Dunavskii, G.A.   1972.   Functional condition of circulatory organs
in workers employed  in the production of organochlorine compounds.
Gig. Tr. Prof. Zabol.  16: 48.  (Rus.)  (Abst.)

Du Pont de Nemours  and  Co.    1968.  Human  skin absorption  studies
with  tr ichlorotr if luoroethane,  F-113.   Med.   Res.  Proj.  Rep. No.
84-68.

Du Pont de Nemours  and  Co.   1973.  Interstate Commerce Commission
regulations and  containers for freon  fluorocarbons.  Bull.  D-75.

Dykan, V.A.   1962.   Changes  in liver and  kidney  functions due  to
raethylene  bromide  and  bromoform.   Nauchn.  Trudy  Ukr.  Nauchn.-
Issled. Inst.  Gig.  Truda Profzabol.  29: 82.

Eddy, C.W. and F.D.  Griffith.   1961.  Metabolism of 14C-dichloro-
difluoromethane  by  rats.   Presented  at  Am.  Ind.  Hyg. Assoc.  Conf.
Toronto, Can. May, 1971.
                               C-86

-------
Evtushenko,  G.Y.   1966.   Methyl chloride  toxicology.   Gig.   Tr.



Prof. Zabol.  10: 20.







Fassett, D.  W.   1972.   Toxicity of halogenated solvents,  aerosol



propellants, and fire-extinguishants.  In:   Proc. Third  Annu. Conf.



Environ.  Toxicol.    AMRL-TR-72-130.    Aerospace  Med.  Res. Lab.,



Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.







Filippova, L.M., et al.  1967.   Chemical mutagens.  IV.  Mutagenic



activity of geminal system.  Genetika.  8:  134.







Fodor, G.G. and A.  Roscovanu.   1976.  Increased  blood-CO-content in



humans  and  animals  by   incorporated  halogenated   hydrocarbons.



Zentralbl Bakteriol. (Orig B)  162:  34.  (Ger. ) (Abst.}







Getzendaner, M.E.,  et al.  1968.   Bromide residues  from  methyl bro-



mide  fumigation of  food  commodities.   Jour.  Agric.  Food Chem.



16: 265.







Good, W.O., et al.   1975.  Sputum cytology  among frequent users  of



pressurized spray cans.  Cancer  Res. 35: 316.







Gorbachev, E.M., et al.   1962.  Disturbances in  neuroendocrine reg-



ulation  and oxidation-reduction by  certain commercial  poisons.



Plenuma Patofiziol Sibiri Dal'n.  Vost.  Sb. 88.
                               C-87

-------
Greenberg, J.O.  1971.   The neurological effects of methyl  bromide



poisoning.  Ind. Med. Surg.  40: 27.







Grimsrud, E.P.  and  R.A.  Rasmussen.   1975.   Survey and analysis  of



halocarbons in the atmosphere by gas chromatography-mass spectrome-



try.  Atmos. Environ.  9:  1014.







Hansch, C.  and  A.  J. Leo.  1979.   Substituent Constants for Cor-



relation Analysis  in Chemistry and Biology.   Wiley  Interscience,



New York.







Hansen, H., et al.   1953.  Methyl chloride  intoxification:  Report



of 15 cases.  AMA Arch.  Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med.   8: 328.







Harsch, D.  1977.  Study  of halocarbon  concentrations  in  indoor en-



vironments.   Final  rep.  EPA  Contract  No.  WA  6-99-2922-J.   U.S.



EPA, Washington, D.C.







Harsch, D.  and  R.A. Rasmussen.   1977.   Identification  of methyl



bromide in  urban air.   EPA  Contract  No. WA  6-99-2922-Jour.  Off.



Res. Dev., U.S.  EPA, Washington, D.C.   (Unpubl.  rep.)







Haun, C. ,  et al.  1972.  Continuous Animal Exposure to  Low Levels  of



Dichloromethane.   In;  Proc.  Third  Annu. Conf.  Environ.  Toxicol.



AMRL-TR-130: 12.   Aerospace  Med.  Res.   Lab.,  Wright  Patterson Air



Force Base, Ohio.
                               C-88

-------
Health and Welfare Canada.  1977.   Environmental Health Directorate



national survey of halomethane  in  drinking water.








Heppel, L.A.  and  P.A.  Neal.   1944.  Toxicology  of dichloromethane



(methylene chloride).  II. Its  effect upon running activity  in  the



male rat.  Jour.  Ind. Hyg. Toxicol.  26: 17.







Hester, N.E., et  al.   1974.   Fluorocarbons in the Los Angeles  ba-



sin.  Air Pollut. Control Assoc. Jour.  24: 591.







Hine, C.H.   1969.  Methyl bromide  poisoning.   Jour.  Occup.   Med.



11: 1.







Howard, P. and  A.  Hanchett.   1975.  Chlorofluorocarbon sources of



environ-contamination.  Science.   189: 217.







Howard, P.H., et al.   1974.  Environmental  hazard assessment  of  one



and  two  carbon  fluorocarbons.    EPA 560/2-75-003.   TR-74-572.1.



Off. Toxic Subst.  U.S. EPA,  Washington, D.C.







Hughes, J.P.   1954.   Hazardous exposure  to  some  so-called safe sol-



vents.   Jour. Am. Med. Assoc.    156: 234.







International Agency  for  Research  on Cancer.    1978.   Information



bulletin on  the  survey of chemicals being tested for carcinogen-



icity,  No.  7.  World  Health Organ., Lyon,  France.
                               C-89

-------
Irish, D.D., et al.   1940.   The  response  attending  exposure  of  lab-



oratory  animals  to  vapors of  methyl bromide.    Jour.  Ind.   Hyg.



Toxicol.  22: 218.







Irish, D.D., et al.   1941.   Chemical changes of methyl bromide  in



the animal  body  in  relation to its  physiological  effects.   Jour.



Ind. Hyg. Toxicol.   23: 408.







Jenkins, L.J., et al.   1970.   Repeated and continuous exposure  of



laboratory  animals  to  trichlorofluoromethane.     Toxicol.  Appl.



Pharmacol.   16: 133.







Johnson,  M.K.    1966.    Metabolism  of   iodomethane  in  the   rat.



Biochem. Jour.   98: 38.







Johnstone,  R.  1945.  Methyl bromide intoxication of large group  of



workers.  Ind.  Med.  14: 495.







Jongen, W.M.F., et al.  1978. Mutagenic effect of  dichloromethane  on



Salmonella typhimurium.  Mutat. Res.   56:  245.








Kakizaki, T.   1967.   Studies  on methyl  bromide poisoning.   Ind.



Health.  5: 135.







Karpov,  B.C.    1963.    Tr.  Leningr.  Sanit.-Gigien.  Med.  Inst.



75: 231.  (Summarized  in Clayton, 1966).
                               C-90

-------
Kehoe, R.A.  1943.  Unpublished  report.   In; Azar, et  al.   1972.







Killen, S.M. and W.3. Harris.  1972.  Direct depression of  myocar-



dial contractility by the aerosol propellant gas, dichlorodifluoro-



methane.  Jour. Pharm. Exp. Ther.  183: 245.







Kleopfer, R.D.  1976.  Analysis  of drinking water  for  organic  com-



pounds.    Identification  and  analysis  of  organic  pollutants  in



water.  Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan.







Knight, H.D.  and  M.  Reina-Guerra.  1977.   Intoxication of cattle



with  sodium  bromide-contaminated  feed.    Am.  Jour. Vet.   Res.



38: 407.







Krey, P.W., et al.  1976.   Stratospheric concentrations of CC1,F  in



1974.  Jour. Geophys. Res.  81:  1557.







Kubota, S.   1955.   Industrial poisoning in chemical  plants.    I.



Methyl bromide poisoning.  Jour.  Soc. Org. Synth. Chem.  13: 605.







Kutob, S.D. and G.L.  Plaa.   1962.  A procedure for estimating the



hepatotoxic potential of  certain industrial   solvents.   Toxicol.



Appl. Pharmacol.  4:  354.







Lebowitz,   M.D.    1976.    Aerosol usage and  respiratory symptoms.



Arch. Environ. Health.  31: 83.
                               C-91

-------
Lehmann, K.B. and I. Schmidt-Kehl.   1936.   The  thirteen most impor-



tant chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons from the  standpoint of  in-



dustrial hygiene.  Arch. Hyg.  116: 131.







Lewis, S.E.   1948.   Inhibition of SH enzymes by  methyl bromide.   Na-



ture.  161:  692.







Lillian,  D.  and  H.B.  Singh.   1974.   Absolute  determination of



atmospheric  halocarbons by  gas phase  conlometry.    Anal. Chem.



46: 1060.







Lillian, D., et  al.   1975.   Atmospheric fates of halogenated com-



pounds.  Environ. Sci. Technol.  9: 1042.








Longley, E.O. and A.T.  Jones.   1965.   Methyl bromide  poisoning in



man.  Ind. Med.  Surg.  34: 499.







Lovelock, J.E.   1971.  Atmospheric  fluorine compounds as indicators



of air movements.  Nature.  230: 379.







Lovelock, J.E.   1972.   Atmospheric turbidity and CCl^F  concentra-



tions  in rural  southern England  and  southern   Ireland.    Atmos.



Environ.  6:  917.







Lovelock, J.E.   1974.    Atmospheric  halocarbons  and  stratospheric



ozone.  Nature.   252: 292.
                               C-92

-------
Lovelock, J.E.   1975.   Natural  halocarbons  in the air and  in  the



sea.  Nature.  256:  193.







Lovelock, J.E., et al.   1973.  Halogenated hydrocarbons in and over



the Atlantic.  Nature.  241: 194.







Lucas, G.H.W.  1928.  A study of the fate and toxicology of  bromine



and chlorine anesthetics.  Jour. Pharm.  Exp.  Ther.   34:237.







Lynn, G.E.,  et al.  1963.   Occurrence  of  bromide in the milk of cows



fed sodium bromide and grain fumigated with  methyl  bromide.   Jour.



Agric. Food Chem.  11: 87.







MacDonald,  J.D.C.   1964.    Methyl chloride  intoxication.    Jour.



Occup. Med.   6: 81.







Marier, G.,  et al.   1973.  Blood fluorocarbon levels  following  ex-



posures to a variety of household  aerosols.   Household  Pers.  Prod.



Ind.  10: 68.







Matsumoto, T., et al.  1968.  Aerosol tissue  adhesive  spray:  Fate



of  freons and  their acute  topical and  systemic  toxicity.    Arch.



Surg.  97: 727.







McConnell, G., et al.  1975.  Chlorinated hydrocarbons  and  the  en-



vironment.  Endeavour.   34: 13.
                               C-93

-------
Mellerio, F.,  et al.  1973.   Electroencephalography and acute methyl



bromide poisoning. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.  34: 732.








Mellerio, F. ,  et al.  1974.   Electroencephalographie au cours des



intoxicantions aiques par  brocure  de  methyle.  Jour. Eur. Toxicol.



7: 119.







Metcalf, R.L.  and  P.Y.  Lu.   1973.   Environmental distribution and



metabolic fate  of key  industrial  pollutants and  pesticides  in  a



model  ecosystem.   Univ.  Illinois Water Resour.   Center, UILU-WRC-



0069.  PB 225479, Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, Virginia.







Miller, D.P. and H.W.  Haggard.  1943.   Intracellular penetration of



bromide as  feature in toxicity of alkyl bromides.   Jour. Ind. Hyg.



Toxicol.  25:  423.







Miller, E.G.  1978.  Some  current perspectives on chemical carcino-



genesis in  humans  and  experimental animals: Presidential address.



Cancer Res.   38: 1479.








Mizyokova,  I.G.  and G.N. Bakhishev. 1971. Specific  treatment of a-



cute methylbromide poisoning.  Vrach. Delo.  7:  128.








Monro, H.A.U., et al. 1955.  Methyl bromide concentrations in ship



and  railway car  fumigation  of   peanuts.   Sntomoi.  Soc.  Ontario,



Annu.  Rep.  86:  65.
                               C-94

-------
Morgan, A., et al.  1967.  Studies on  the  retention  and metabolism



of  inhaled methyl  iodine.   II.   Metabolism  of  methyl  iodide.



Health Physics.   13: 1067.







Morgan,  A. ,  et  al.   1972.   Absorption and  retention of  inhaled



fluorinated hydrocarbon  vapors.   Int.  Jour.  Appl. Radiat.  Isotop.



23: 285.







Morgan, A.J.   1942.  Methyl  chloride intoxication.  Q. Jour. Med.



41: 29.








Morris, J.C. and G. McKay.  1975.  Formation of halogenated  organ-



ics by chlorination of water supplies.  EPA 600/1-75-002.   PB 241-



511.  Natl. Tech. Inf.  Serv., Springfield, Virginia.







Moskowitz, S.  and H. Shapiro.   1952.   Fatal exposure  to methylene



chloride vapor.  Arch.  Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med.  6:  116.







Munson, A.E.,  et  al.  1977.   Functional activity of the reticulo-



endothelial system in mice exposed to haloalkanes  for  ninety days.



14th Natl.  Reticuloendothelial  Soc.  Meet. Tucson,  Arizona.  Dec.



6-9. (Ab t.)







Munson, A.E., et al.  1978.  Reticuloendothelial  system function  in



mice exposed   to  four  haloalkanes:  Drinking water  contaminants.



Submitted:  Soc.  Toxicol.  (Abst.)
                               C-95

-------
National Academy  of Sciences.   1977.   Drinking Water and Health.



Washington, D.C.








National Academy  of Sciences.   1978.  Nonfluorinated halomethanes



in the environment.  Washington, D.C.







National Cancer Institute.  1977.  Chemicals being tested  for car-



cinogenicity  by the bioassay  program.    Rep.   Tech.  Inf.  Resour.



Branch,  Natl.  Cancer  Inst.,  U.S.  Dep.  Health  Edu.   Welfare,



Bethesda, Maryland.







National  Institute for  Occupational Safety  and Health.   1976a.



Criteria  for   a  recommended  standard:   occupational  exposure   to



methylene  chloride.   HEW Pub. No. 76-138.   U.S. Dep. Health Edu.



Welfare, Cincinnati, Ohio.







National  Institute for  Occupational Safety  and Health.   1976b.



Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances. HEW Pub. No. 76-



191.   U.S. Dep. Health Edu. Welfare, Rockville,  Maryland.







National Library  of Medicine.   1978.    Toxicity of  halomethanes.



Off-line  bibliographic  citation  list   generated  by Medlars  II,



Toxline before  1975 and 1975-1978.







Occupational Safety and Health Administration.   1976.  General in-



dustry  standards.   OSHA 2206,  revised  January, 1976.   U.S.  Dep.



Labor, Washington,  D.C.
                               :-96

-------
Ohta, T.,  et  al.   1976.   Local distribution of  chlorinated  hydro-



carbons  in the ambient air  in Tokyo.  Atmos. Environ.   10:  557.







Owens, D.F. and A.T. Rossano.  1969.  Design procedures to  control



cigarette smoke and other air pollutants.  ASHPAE Trans.  75:  93.







Palmer,  T.Y.   1976.  Combustion  sources of atmospheric  chlorine.



Nature.  263: 44.







Pattyf F.A.   1958.   Industrial  hygiene and  toxicology.   2nd  ed.



Vol.   I.   Toxicology.    Interscience Publishers,  John Wiley  and



Sons, Inc., New York.







Patty, F.A.   .1.363.   Industrial  hygiene and  toxicology.   2nd  ed.



Vol.  II.   Toxicology.    Interscience  Publishers,   John Wiley  and



Sons, Inc., New York.







Paulet, G., et al.  1975.  Fluorocarbons and general metabolism  in



the rat,  rabbit, and dog.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.   34: 197.







Philippe, R.J. and M.E.  Hobbs.  1956.  Some components  of the  gas-



phase of cigarette smoke.  Anal.  Chem.  28: 2002.







Pierotti,  D.  and  R.A.  Rasmussen.    1976.   Interim  report  on  the



atmospheric measurement  of nitrous  oxide  and the  halocarbons.   NASA



Grant NSG 7214.   Natl. Aeronautics Space Admin., Washington, D.C.
                               C-97

-------
Pierotti, D., et al.   1976.   Trip report on the cruise of  the R/V



Alpha Helix from San Diego,  Calif.,  to San Martin,  Peru.  NSF Grant



No. OCE 75-04688A03.  Natl.  Sci. Foundation, Washington, D.C.







Poirier, L.A., et  al.  1975.   Bioassay of  alkylhalides and nucle-



oxide base  analogs by pulmonary  tumor response  in Strain A mice.



Cancer Res.  35:  1411.







Prendergast, J.A.,  et  al.   1967.   Effects on experimental  animals



of  long-term  inhalation   of  trichloroethylene,   carbon  tetra-



chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, and 1,1-



dichloroethylene.  Toxicol.  Appl. Pharmacol.  10:  270.







Price,  P.J.,  et al.  1978.  Transforming  activities  of trichloro-



ethylene and proposed Ind.  alternatives.  In Vitro.   14: 290.







Purchase,  I.F.H.,  et  al.   1978.  An  evaluation  of six short-term



tests  for   detecting  organix  chemical  carcinogens.    Br.  Jour.



Cancer.   37: 873.








Quevauviller, A.   1965.   Hygiene et  securite des  pulseurs pour aer-



osols medicamenteaux.   Prod. Probl.  Pharm.  20: 14.








Quevauviller, A.,  et al.   1964.   Local tolerance  in animals to



chlorofluorinated hydrocarbons.  Therapie.  19: 247.
                               C-98

-------
Rathus, E.M. and P.J. Landy.  1961.   Methyl bromide  poisoning.   Br.



Jour. Ind. Med.  18: 53.







Redford-Ellis,  M.  and  A.H.  Gowenlock.  1971a.  Reaction of  chloro-



methane with human blood.  Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol.   30:  36.








Redford-Ellis, M. and A.H. Gowenlock.  1971b.  Reaction of  chloro-



methane  with  preparations  of  liver,   brain,  and  kidney.    Acta



Pharmacol. Toxicol.  30: 49.







Riley, E.G., et al.   1966.   Methylene chloride  vapor in expired  air



of human subjects.  Am.  Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Jour.  27: 341.







Roehm, R.S., et  al.   1943.   The  fumigation of dairy  products with



methyl bromide.  Jour. Dairy Sci.  26:  205.







Rosenblum, I.,  et al.   1960.   Chronic  ingestion by dogs  of methyl



bromide-fumigated foods.  Arch. Environ. Health.  1:  316.







Salg, J.   1977.   Cancer  mortality  rates  and drinking water in  346



counties of the Ohio River Valley Basin.  EPA Contract No. PO-5-03-



4528-J.  Ph.D.  thesis.  Univ. of North Carolina.







Sanders, V.M., et al.  1977.  Functional activity of  the  reticulo-



endothelial  system  (RES)  in  mice   exposed  to  the  halomethanes,



drinking water contaminants.  Submitted: Va. Jour.  Sci.   (Abst.)
                               >99

-------
Savolainen, H. ,  et  al.   1977.   Biochemical and behavioral  effects



of  inhalation  exposure  to tetrachloroethylene and dichlormethane.



Jour. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.   36: 941.








Sax, N.I.   1968.   Dangerous Properties  of  Industrial Materials.



3rd ed.  Reinhold Book Corp., New York.







Sayers, R.R.,  et al.  1930.   Toxicity  of dichlorodiflouromethane.



U.S. Bur.  Mines Rep. R.I. 3013.








Schuller,  G.B., et al.   1978.   Effect of  four  haloalkanes on humor-



al  and  cell  mediated  immunity  in mice.    Presented  Soc.  Toxicol.



Meet.








Schwetz, B.A.,  et al.   1975.   The  effect  of maternally  inhaled  tri-



chloroethylene,  perchloroethylene,   methyl  chloroform, and meth-



ylene chloride on embryonal and fetal development  in  mice and rats.



Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  32: 84.








Scudamore, K.A. and S.G. Heuser.  1970.  Residual free methyl  bro-



mide in fumigated commodities.  Pestic. Sci.   1: 14.








Seo, S.T., et  al.   1970.  Residues  of ethylene dibromide, methyl



bromide, and ethylene  chlorobromide resulting  from  fumigation of



fruits  and  vegetables  infested  with  fruit  flies.    Jour. Econ.



Entomol.  63: 1093.
                              C-100

-------
Shackelford, W.M. and L.H. Keith.  1976.  Frequency of organic com-



pounds  identified in water.  EPA-600/4-76-062.   Environ.  Res.  Lab.



U.S. EPA, Athens, Georgia.







Shargel,  L.  and  R.  Koss.   1972.    Determination  of  fluorinated



hydrocarbon propellants  in blood of dogs  after  aerosol  administra-



tion.   Jour. Pharmacol.  Sci.   61:  1445.







Sherman, H.  1974.  Long-term feeding studies in rats  and  dogs with



dichlorodifluoromethane  (Freon 12  Food Freezant).   Haskell  Lab.



(Unpubl. rep.)








Shimkin, M.B.  and G.D.  Stoner.  1975.   Lung tumors in mice:  Ap-



plication to carcinogenesis bioassay.   Adv.  Cancer  Res.   21:  1.








Simmon, V.F., et al.  1977.  Mutagenic Activity of Chemicals  Identi-



fied in Drinking Water.   In;  S.  Scott,  et al.  (eds.),  Progress  in



Genetic Toxicology.







Simmonds, P.G.,  et  al.   1974.   Distribution of atmospheric  halo-



carbons  in  the air  over the  Los  Angeles basin.   Atmos.  Environ.



8:  209.







Singh,  H.B., et  al.   1977.   Urban nonurban  relationships of  halo-



carbons,  SFg,  N-0  and   other  atmospheric  constituents.    Atmos.



Environ.  11: 819.
                              C-101

-------
Sivak, A.  1978.  BALE flash C-3T3 neoplastic  transformation  assay
with  methylene  chloride  (food grade  test specification).    Rep.
Natl. Coffee Assoc. Inc.

Slater,  T.F.    1965.   Relative  toxic  activities  of  tetrachloro-
methane and trichlorofluoromethane.  Biochem.  Pharmacol.   14:  178.

Smith, W.W. and W.F. von Oettingen.  1947a.  The acute  and  chronic
toxicity of methyl  chloride:  I.  Mortality resulting from  exposure
to methyl  chloride  in concentrations of  4,000 to  300  ppm.   Jour.
Ind. Hyg. Toxicol.  29: 47.

Smith, W.W. and W.F.  von  Oettingen.  1947b.  The acute  and  chronic
toxicity of methyl  chloride.   II.   Symptomatology of animals  poi-
soned by methyl chloride, Jour. Ind. Hyg.  Toxicol.   29:  123.

Sokolova, I.P.  1972.  Hygienic  standardization of  some  fumigants
in the air of ship chambers after  gas treatment.  Tr. Nauch. Konf.,
Nauch.-lssled. Inst. Gig. Vod. Transp.  2: 160.

Speizer, F.E.,  et  al.   1975.   Palpitation  rates associated  with
fluorocarbon  exposure  in a  hospital setting.    New  England  Jour.
Med.  292: 624.

Spevac, L., et  al.   1976.   Methyl chloride poisoning  in  four  mem-
bers of a family.    Br. Jour. Ind. Med.  33: 272.
                              C-102

-------
Stecher, P.G., et al.  1968.  The Merck  Index.   8th  ed.   Merck  and



Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey.







Stephan, C.E.  1980.  Memorandum to J. Stara.  U.S.  SPA.  July  3.







Stephens,  S.,  et al.   1970.    Phenotypic  and genetic  effects  in



Neurospora crassa produced  by selected bases and gases mixed with



oxygen.  Dev. Ind. Microbiol.   12: 346.








Stewart, R.D. and C.L. Hake.   1976.   Paint remover  hazard.  Jour.



Am. Med. Assoc.  235: 398.







Stewart, R.D., et al.  1972a.   Experimental human exposure to meth-



ylene chloride.  Arch. Environ. Health.  25: 342.








Stewart, R.D., et  al.  1972b.   Carboxyhemoglobin elevation after



exposure to dichloromethane.  Science.   176: 295.








Stofen, D.  1973.  Tolerance  levels for  toxic substances  in drink-



ing water.   Stadtehyg.    24:  109.   (Transl. by  R.  Mansfield,   Oak



Ridge Natl. Lab.  ORNL-Tr-2975).







Stokinger, H.E. and R.L.  Woodward.  1958.  Toxicologic methods  for



establishing  drinking water  standards.    Jour.   Am. Water  Works



Assoc.   50: 515.
                              C-103

-------
Stokinger, H.E.,  et al.   1963.   Threshold  limit values for  1963.



Jour. Occup.  Med.   5: 491.







Su, C. and E.  Goldberg.   1973.   Chlorofluorocarbons in the atmos-



phere.  Nature.  245: 27.








Su, C. and  E.  Goldberg.   1976.   Environmental Concentrations and



Fluxes of Some Halocarbons.   In; H.L. Windom and R.A. Duce  (eds.),



Marine Pollutant  Transfer.   Lexington  Books,  B.C.  Heath and Co.,



Lexington, Massachusetts.







Symons, J.M.,  et al.  1975.   National organics  reconnaissance sur-



vey  for   halogenated organics.    Jour.  Am.   Water  Works  Assoc.



67: 634.







Taylor, G.J.  and R.T. Drew.   1975.   Cardiomyopathy predisposes ham-



sters   to  trichlorofluoromethane.   Submitted  Toxicol.   Appl.



Pharmacol.







Taylor, G.J.  and  w.S.  Harris.   1970.   Glue  sniffing causes heart



block in mice.  Science.   170:  866.







Texas State Department of Health.   1957.  Methyl bromide poisoning.



Rep. No.  OH-14, Div. Occup.  Health.
                              C-L04

-------
Theiss, J.C.,  et al.   1977.   Test  for careinogenicity of organic



contaminants of  United  States drinking waters  by pulmonary  tumor



response in strain A mice.  Cancer Res.  37: 2717.







Tourangeau, F.J. and S.R.  Plamondon.   1945.   Cases of exposure  to



methyl bromide vapours.   Can. Jour. Pub. Health.   36:  362.








Uehleke, H. and  T. Warner.   1975.   A comparative study of the  ir-



reversible  binding  of labeled  halothane,  trichlorofluoromethane,



chloroform, and  carbon tetrachloride to hepatic  protein and lipids



in vitro and in  vivo.   Arch. Toxicol.  34: 289.







Uehleke, H., et al.  1977.   Metabolic activation  of haloalkanes  and



tests ir> vitro for mutagenicity.  Xenobiotica.   7: 393.







Underwriters Laboratories.   1971.   Comparative  hazards  of modern



refrigerants.  Data card No. UL5 and UL5-A.







U.S.  Department of Health,  Education, and Welfare.  1975.  Registry



of toxic effects of chemical substances.  Washington,  D.C.







U.S.  EPA.   1975.  Preliminary  assessment  of suspected carcinogens



in drinking water,  and appendices.   Report  to Congress, Washington,



D.C.
                              C-105

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1976.   Environmental hazard  assessment  report, major



one-and  two-carbon  saturated  fluorocarbons,  review  of  data.   EPA



560/8-76-003.   Off. Toxic Subst.  Washington, D.C.







U.S. EPA.  1977.  Multimedia environmental goals for environmental



assessment.   Interagency  energy-environment  research and develop-



ment program report.   EPA  600/7-77-136a,b.  Environ.  Res. Lab., Re-



search Triangle Park, North Carolina.







U.S. EPA.  1978a.  Statement of basis and purpose for an amendment



to the national interim primary drinking water regulations on tri-



halomethanes,  January, 1978.  Off. Water Supply, Washington, D.C.







U.S. EPA.   1978b.   The  National Organic Monitoring Survey.   Tech.



Support Div.,  Off. Water Supply, Washington,  D.C.  (Unpubl.  rep.)







U.S. EPA.  1980.  Seafood consumption data analysis.   Stanford Re-



search Institute  International.   Menlo  Park,  California.   Final



Report, Task 11,  Contract No. 68-01-3887.







Van Stee, E.W. and K.C.  Back.   1971.  Brain and heart accumulation



of bromotrifluoromethane.   Rep.  AD 721211.  Natl. Tech.  Inf. Serv.,



Springfield, Virginia.







Veith, G.D.  1980.  Memorandum  to C.E. Stephan.  U.S. EPA.  April 14.
                              C-106

-------
Veith, G.D., et al.  1979.   Measuring and  estimating the  bioconcen-
tration  factor  of  chemicals in fish.  Jour.  Fish Res.  Board  Can.
36: 1040.

Viner, N.   1945.  Methyl bromide poisoning: New  industrial  hazard.
Can. Med. Assoc. Jour.  53: 43.

Vitte, V.I., et  al.   1970.   Residual amounts of  bromides in plant
food products fumigated with methyl  bromide and  characteristics of
their  biological  action.   Gig. Primen.,  Toksikol.  Pestifcs, Klin.
Otravlenii.  8: 386.

von Oettingen, W.F.  1955.  The halogenated hydrocarbons: Toxicity
and  potential  dangers.     No.  414.   U.S.  Pub.  Health  Serv.,
Washington, D.C.

von Oettingen, W.F.  1964.  The Halogenated Hydrocarbons of Indus-
trial and Toxicological Importance.   Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

von Oettingen, W.F., et al.  1949.   Relation between  the toxic ac-
tion of chlorinated methanes and their chemical  and physiochemical
properties.  Natl. Inst. Health Bull.  No. 191.

von Oettingen, W.F., et al.   1950.  Comparative studies of the  tox-
icity and pharmacodynamic action of  chlorinated  methanes with  spe-
cial  reference  to  their  physical  and chemical characteristics.
Arch.  Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther.  81: 17.
                              C-107

-------
Vozovaya, M.A.  1974.  Gynecological  illnesses  in workers  of major



industrial rubber products plants occupations.   Gig.  Tr.  Sostoyanie



Spetsificheskikh  Funkts.  Rab.  Neftekhim.    Khim.  Prom-sti.    56.



(Rus.) (Abst.)








Waritz, R.S.   L971.   Toxicology of some commercial  fluorocarbons.



Rep. AD 751429.  Natl. Tech.  Inf. Serv.  Springfield, Virginia.








Watanabe, T.  and  D.M.  Aviado.   1975.   Toxicity of aerosol  propel-



lants  in  the  respiratory  and  circulatory systems.   VII. Influence



of  pulmonary emphysema  and anesthesia  in the  rat.   Toxicology.



3: 225.







Watrous, R.M.  1942.   Methyl bromide:  Local and  mild  systemic toxic



effects.  Ind. Med.  11: 575.







Weinstein, I.B.  1978.  Current  concepts on mechanisms of  chemical



carcinogenesis.  Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med.   54: 366.







Weissbecker,  L., et al.  1971.   Cigarette  smoke and  tracheal mucus



transport rate:  Isolation  of  effect of  components of  smoke.    Am.



Rev. Resp. Dis.  104:  182.








Wilkness, P.E.,  et  al.    1973.   Atmospheric  trace  gases in  the



southern hemisphere.   Nature.  245: 45.
                              C-108

-------
Wilkness, P.E., et al.  1975.  Trichlorofluoromethane in the tropo-



sphere,  distribution  and   increase,   1971   to   1974.     Science.



187: 832.







Williford, J.H., et al.  1974.   Residual bromide  in tissues of  rats



fed methyl bromide fumigated diets.  Jour. Anim.  Sci.   38:  572.







Wills, J.H.   1972.    Sensitization  of  the heart  to  catecholamine-



induced arrhythmia.   Proc.  3rd  Ann.  Conf.  Environ.  Toxicol.  AD  Rep.



No. 773766.  Natl. Tech. Inf.  Serv. Springfield,  Virginia.







Winneke, G.   1974.   Behavioral Effects  of  Methylene Chloride  and



Carbon Monoxide as Assessed by  Sensory  and Psychomotor Performance.



In; Behavioral  Toxicology  - Early  Detection  of  Occupational  Haz-



ards.  Publ. No.  (NIOSH) 74-126.  U.S.  Dep. Health Edu. Welfare.







Wolburg, I.   1973.  The use  of  electroencephalography in industrial



toxicology.  Activ.  Nerv. Super.  15:  226.  (Ger.)  (Abst.)







Wyers, H.  1945.  Methyl  bromide intoxication.  Br. Jour.  Ind.  Med.



2: 24.
                              C-109

-------
                            APPENDIX I



                Summary and Conclusions Regarding



               the  Careinogenicity of Halomethanes*







     The  halomethanes  addressed  in  this  report are  bromomethane,



chloromethane,  d ichloromethane,   tr ibromomethane ,  broitiod ichloro-



methane,   dichlorodifluoromethane,   and    trichlorofluoromethane.



Chloroform, which is also  a trihalomethane,  is discussed  in  another



document.



     Positive associations between cancer mortality rates in humans



and trihalomethanes in drinking water have been reported.   In addi-



tion  to  chloroform, these  trihalomethanes  consisted  primarily  of



bromodichloromethane, chlorodibromomethane,  and  also  barely mea-



surable  levels  of  tribromomethane.   There  have been positive  re-



sults for  tribromomethane  using strain A/St.  male  mice in  the pul-



monary  adenoma  bioassay.    Bromomethane,  chloromethane,  dichloro-



methane,  bromodichloromethane,  and  tribromomethane  have been  re-



ported as mutagenic in the Ames1 test without metabolic activation.



Dichlorodifluoromethane caused a  significant  increase  in  mutant



frequency  in Neurospora crassa, but was  negative in the Ames1  test.



No data implicating trichlorofluoromethane as a possible  carcinogen



have been  published.



     Because positive results for  the mutagenic endpoint correlate



with positive results in  i n  vivo  bioassay for oncogenicity,  muta-



genic data  for  the  halomethanes suggests  that several of the com-



pounds  might  be  carcinogenic.    Carcinogenic!ty data  currently
                              C-110

-------
available for the halomethanes are not adequate for  the development

of water  criteria  levels.   We suggest  that  the criteria level be

the same  as  that for chloroform  (1.9 )ag/D   in  order  to keep  the

individual lifetime cancer risk below 10

     In cases  such  as halomethanes where one criterion  is derived

for an entire  class of  compounds, the  Agency  does  not state that

each chemical  in the class is a  carcinogen.   The  intended  inter-

pretation of the criterion is  that the risk  is  less  than  10   when-

ever the  total  concentration  of  all  halomethanes in water is less

than the criterion.   In a hypothetical  case where all of  the halo-

methanes  in  a  sample are  non-carcinogenic,  the criterion would be

too strict;  however,  this  situation  seldom  occurs.   In most cases

where halomethanes are detected, a mixture of compounds  occurs  and

in calculation  of  the criterion  the assumption  is  made that  all

components have  the same carcinogenic potency as  chloroform.
*This  summary  has been  prepared  and approved  by the Carcinogens
 Assessment Group, EPA, June, 1979.
                              C-lll

-------